HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Stonehedge Drive (5)Q
2 0
1MIP &OM
G o\s ` o /I%o6R— of 7t f%470 7 if,/ 4tv
dol
VV7r p Vvmwt-!5 V-.'C4 r- TfC•tT-r „_ :'t'a 1:)cz&t4 I•.a.�4D
FeC::�L`f' 6,rµE:,D AY -.S-04'4 ' tv -*- I (-fx- MF�
Engineers Incorporated( Vermont
P. 0. Box 2187
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
Phone (802) 863-6389
TO
ox Gfe /
R E C E
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop drawings
❑ Copy of letter
JUN 2
LCE U(_�G2 OlF UQ G MMODU L
DATE :JOB NO.
n
ATTENTION
RE
V
Q%Attached ❑ Unde"WpvgterttsvervigrE
❑ Prints cirnsMa euRLiNG' ns ❑ Samples
❑ Change order ❑
the following items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
r Lfi --
i
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
C, For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
41 For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
For review and comment ❑
FOR BIDS DUE 19
REMARKS
r
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
c
It
COPY TO_ Aw� �Q�
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
Cedar Glen North - Traffic Considerations
The ingress and egrees"to the proposed development will be
onto Spear Street (T. R. #19) 2,100' South of the Swift Street
intersection in South Burlington.
The access road, Cedar Glen Drive, will lie West of Spear
Street. The sight distance :Forth along Spear St. from the pro-
posed intersection is about 950'. The sight distance South .
along Spear St., which is essentially tangent at.the intersec-
tion point, is more than one fourth mile.
From traffic counts conducted by the developer this spring,
the peak morning traffic flowon Spear Street approaches 160
vehicles per hour. About 83; of these are travelling northerly
as would be expected. The peak evening traffic flow approaches
173 vehicles per hour. Sixty Six percent (666) of that traffic
is travelling southerly.
The proposed adult neighborhood community Cedar Glen North,
will consist of about 220 condominium type living units expected
to house an average 1.7 to 1.8 persons per unit. Past experience
has shown that there will be less than one vehicle per unit.
It is expected that the residents, age 52 and older, will
not have the stereotype set patterns; such as, off to work at
h 3:00 A'?. It is anticipated that these people may use their
vehicles a maximum of twice a day and that this vehicular :nove-
ment will be uniform during a 12 hour period 7 AM to 7 PM.
Assu_*ning 220 vehicles make 2 trips over a 12 hour period
would increase the peak evening hourly traffic to 210 vehicles
per hour. This traffic volume should not be considered exces-
sive for Spear Street which is capable of handling substantially
larger traffic volumes -than that.
Prepared by: Engineers Incorporated of
Vermont
P. 0. Box 2187
!i• So. Burlington, Vt. 05401
March 8, 1973
T
March 12, 1973
Mr
. 13rian Lloyd, Coordinator
District Environmental Coi-,imiss-Jon No. 4
Chittenden County Tleic-ional Planning Commission
J8 Pearl Street
E.sw:ex "a -unction, Vermont 05452
tee: Ciz-,dar -3ler, .',iCart
Dear 'Mr. Lloyd:
The proposed 220 unit adult neighborhood community
planned for construction off Spear Stra-et in South Burlinqton
is intendeLl to to the City water system. The
developi-iiant will .use ar. estimated 44,000 gpd of water.
It is i)underitandinj t1lat the developer Aha3 aqret:d to
construct roadways with ade�i;uate turning radii, etc., to
satisfy the requireiitents of our fire departmnt for sati-,factory
emer-fency vt--�-hicle access..
1,7ith tldeveloper's agreement to conztruct approximately
2,110 feet of 12 inch water main southerly ' - along Spear Street
from the ��xistinq 24 inch Chamin plaDistrict line- at
Swift Street, the City's water syster, can adequately handle t.he
additional burden with no undue hardship.
Thank you for your consideration.
.LU
Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager and Lngineer
WJS1h
CC: Mr. henry Potter
101r. Terrance Boyle
Engineers Incorporated of Verriont
CONSULTING M L%-- INEERS
PAULSEN L.SSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
40 I'ARRELL STREET • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VLRMONT 05401 O TEL. (802) 86A 0126
October 1$ , 1972
City of South Burlington
1181 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attention: Mr. William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: P. A. Job No. 7223
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your letter dated 13 September 1972
requesting a study of two sewers in the Shelburne Road area,
we now present our report and drawings showing the results of
our studies.
To determine the present flows and future capacities
Of the existing lines discharging to the Imperial Drive and
Laurel Drive sewers, the following gagings and surveys
were made.
IMPERIA]. DNIVE SEWER
On the morning of Tuesday, 26 September 1972 at 11:30
an electronic recording device, manufactured by \I3 Pro-
ducts, Inc., was installed in manhole number 2 on Imperial
Drive (Scc aLL.iched sketch plan for location) . The recordL c
remained in Lhe sewer until 10:10 .,.m. the following Monday,
2 OCLObcr .'.72, during which time a constant recording of t:;e
depth of :low through the manhole invert was made.
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 2
The weather during this period was predominently dry
although heavy rain did occur on Friday, 29 September during
the evening hours. A sudden increase in the recorded depth
at about 8:30 p.m. could represent some water entering the
sewers from illegal roof or other connections. Throughout
the complete period of gaging,the maximum reading which oc-
curred fairly regularly in the morning and evening,did not
exceed 43% of the scale on the recording tape. When corrected
from the conversion curve supplied with the instrument, the
flow in the pipe indicates a maximum depth of 30% of the pipe
diameter.
During the period when the instrument was recording,a
survey was made of the road profile and the manholes were
opened to measure the depth to each invert. The fall between
manholes was thus determined together with the gradient for
each length of sewer. From the gradient of the length of
sewer immediately upstream of manhole 2, the recording poi::L,
a slope of 1 foot fall in 18.2 feet was measured. With this
gradient a theoretical velocity of 11 feet per second would
result with the pipe flowing full or half full. However, with
only 30% of the pipe carrying flow, which was the maximum
depth recorded, the proportional velocity reduces to 0.77 of
the theoretical half full or full velocity,which is 8.36 feet
per second. The theoretical proportional discharge at the
same depth of flow is 0.19 of a pipe flowing full. An 8 inch
pipe flowing full with this gradient will discharge approxi-
mately 180 cubic feet per minute or 1,350 gallons per minute,
assuming a friction factor of 0.013 in the Manning formula.
The theoretical proportional discharge at the maximum recorded
flow was, therefore, 180 x .19 cubic feet per minute which
equals 34.2 cubic feet per minute or 256 gallons per minute..
October 11, 1L
City of South Burlington
Pa go 3
However, the foregoing theoretical values are based on pipes
laid at a very constant grade and with good even joints. The
sewers in question were not constructed in this fashion, there-
fore it was decided that the velocity should be measured over
the full length of the upstream sewer. In the sewer length
from manhole 2 to 3 the actual velocity at 30% depth of flow was measured at 6 feet per second or 72% of the theoretical
velocity. The actual flow passing through the manhole at the
measured velocity therefore equals 72% of 256 or 184 gallons
per minute.
TABULATION
OF ESTIMATED
CAPACITY OF SEWER LENGTHS
TRIBUTARY TO
IMPERIAL DRIVE
Estimated
Estimated
Sewer
Capacity
Capacity 68%
Location Length
Gradient
Pipe Full
Pipe Depth
Remarks
FrilsI-engtH
Imp. Dr. MH 1-MH
2 0.49%
328 GPM
262 GPM
allows for
138 new units
with pipe full
or 75 with
68% of pipe
o
depth
MH
2-MH
3
5.5/0
1180
GPM
945
GPM
it
MH
3-MH
4
3.13%
936
GPM
758
GPM
Worth St.
MH
4-MH
5
1.39%
552
GPM
442
GPM
And. Ave
MH
5-MH
6
0.362%
288
GPM
230
GPM
These length
although of
it
MH
6-MH
7
0.61%
368
GPM
295
GPM
smaller cap-
"
MH
7-MH
8
1.10%
496
GPM
397
GPM
acity than
MIS 1-2
corn-
"
MH
8-MH
9
1.178%
512
GPM
410
GPM
bine to
provide .451
GPM cap.
Imp. Dr.
MH
4-MH
10
0.345%
276
GPM
221
GPM
Gr. Dol.
MH
10-MH
11
1.725%
612
GPM
490
GPM
"
MH
11-MH
6
0.666%
384
GPM
304
GPM
Estimated full capacity based on 80% of theoretical capacity,
to allow for condition of sewer.
� f
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 4
From the above tabulation it can be seen that the
sewer length with the smallest carrying capacity is the length
from manhole 1 to 2. The estimated full pipe maximum capacity
for this length is 328 gallons per minute. If the maximum
recorded flow of 184 gallons per minute is deducted from this
flow a spare capacity of 144 gallons per minute remains.
Assuming each unit of the proposed newdevelo.pment is
to house 3 persons and each person returns 100 gallons of
sewage daily to the sewer (infiltration included) the daily
will equal 300 gallons per unit. Allowing a peak rate
of 5 times average flow, this would be equal to a maximum
hourly rate of 1,500 gallons per day, per unit, or 1.04
gallons per minute. Spare capacity in this length of sewer
will therefore be equal to 144 T-
4 or 138 units, if the pipe is
flowing full. With 68% of the sewer permitted as the maximum
depth of flow the spare capacity in the sewer will reduce to
262 - 184 = 78 gallons per minute and the number of new units
which can then be co mected will be equal to 78 or 75 units.
LAUREL DRIVE SEWER
The gaging in the Laurel Drive sewer was carried out
in the same fashion and with the same equipment used in the
Imperial Drive gaging. The equipment was installed in manhole
number 2 (See attached sketch plan) on Monday, 2'October 1972
at 12:30 p.m. and gaging was continued until 8:40 a.m. the
following Monday, 9 October 1972. The weather was again pre-
dominantly dry except for Saturday when fairly heavy rain
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 5
continued throughout the day and during the evening. No
obvious increase in flow occurred and it can be assumed that
no illegal connections are affecting the flow in these sewer
lengths. The maximum depth recorded on the flow recorder
tape during the whole period was 52% of scale reading for a
period of approximately 30 minutes on Thursday morning be-
tween 7 and 8 a.m. When corrected for the instrument,using
the curve provided, the depth of flow indicates a maximum of
39% of the pipe diameter. From the gradient of the length
of sewer immediately upstream of manhole 2, the gaging point,
a slope of 1 foot fall in 82 feet was measured. With this
gradient a theoretical velocity of 4.15 feet per second would
result with the pipe flowing full or half full. However, with
39% of the pipe depth carrying flow, the maximum recorded
theoretical proportional velocity reduces to 3.7 feet per
second and the theoretical proportional discharge to 0.32 of
a pipe flowing full. An 8 inch pipe flowing full at the
above gradient will discharge approximately 86.9 cubic feet
minute which is equal to 650 gallons per minute. The theo-
retical proportional discharge at the maximum recorded flow
was therefore 650 x 0.32 or 208 gallons per minute.
The theoretical values are again based on pipes laid
true to grade and with good even joints. These sewers,like
those in Imperial Drive, do not have velocities equal to the
theoretical velocities. The actual velocity recorded with
flows at less than half pipe depths was measured at 2.1 feet
per second or 57% of the theoretical velocity. The actual
maximum flow measured through the gaging manhole was therefore
57% of 208 or 119 gallons per minute.
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 6
TABULATION OF ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF SEWER LENGTHS
TRIBUTARY TO LAUREL DRIVE
Location
Sewer
Length
Gradient
Estimated
Capacity
Pipe Full %`
Estimated
Capacity 68%
Pipe Depth
Remarks
Laurel Dr.
MH
1-MH
2
0.847%
432
GPM
355
GPM
it
MH
2-MH
3
1.22%
520
GPM
416
GPM
it
MH
3-MH
4
1.265%
532
GPM
425
GPM
MH
4-MH
5
1.41%
552
GPM
452
GPM
"
MH
5-MH
6
0.435%
312
GPM
250
GPM
"
MH
6-MH
7
0.313%
264
GPM
211
GPM
This
length
allows for
109
new units
with
pipe
full
or 63
with
68% of
pipe
depth
"
MH
7-MH
8
0.238%
232
GPM
185
GPM
Cranwell
Ave.
MH
8-MH
9
1.495%
560
GPM
448
GPM
"
MH
9-MH
10
0.502%
332
GPM
266
GPM
"
MH
10-MH
11
0.637%
372
GPM
298
GPM
MH
11-MH
12
0.426'%
308
GPM
246
GPM
Estimated full capacity based on 80% of theoretical capacity
to allow for condition of sewer.
From the above table it can be seen that the sewer with
the smallest carrying capacity is the length between manholes
7 and 8. The estimated full pipe maximum capacity for the
length is 232 gallons per minute. This length of sewer is,
however, a considerable distance up the line from the gaging
point and therefore it would not carry the maximum flow measured.
However, assuming this flow did occur at this point, the pipe
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 7
would still have additional capacity for 232 - 119 or 113
gallons per minute. With a maximum hourly rate of 1.04
gallons per minute from each of the proposed new housing
units the spare capacity would provide for 1113 or 109 units.
Likewise, if the maximum depth is limited to 68% of the full
depth the spare capacity will equal 185 - 119 or 66 gallons
per minute which is equal to 616 or 63 housing units.
SUMMARY
To summarize the above data, we estimate that the
Imperial Drive and Laurel Drive sewers can handle the follow-
ing additional housing units without any major changes except
perhaps the shelves should be raised to contain the flow within
the pipe channel.
IMPERIAL DRIVE
LAUREL DRIVE
138 housing units if sewer length
MH 1 - MH 2 is allowed to run full.
75 housing units if flow is restricted
to 68% of pipe depth.
109 housing units if sewer length
MH 7 - MH 8 is allowed to run full.
63 housing units if flow is restricted
to 68% of pipe depth.
We calculate from the low flows recorded during the night
that the infiltration rates into the sewers are as follows:
IMPERIAL DRIVE'
Infiltration
Peak Sewage Flow
Total Flow
76 GPM = 41%
108 GPM = 59%
184 GPM
Peak hourly water demand at 5 x
average rate based on last 3 month
period with 80% returned to sewer =105 GPM
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 8
LAUREL DRIVE
Infiltration
Peak Sewage Flow
Total Flow
22.5 GPM = 19%
96.5 GPM = 81
119.0 GPM
Peak hourly water demand at 5 x
average rate based on last 3 month
period with 80% returned to sewer = 98 GPM
All of the above information is based on the information
currently available. No estimate can be made regarding the
infiltration which may occur in these sewers during the spring
thaw when the water table is usually considerably higher.
Very truly yours,
PAULSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Arthur W. Parkes
AWP/meo•
Encl. - Two drawings showing profiles of sewers.
No Text
CONSULTING ENGINEERS R E C E I V E D
Nov 11�
P A U L S E N ASSOCIATES MANAGER'S OFFICE
INCORPORATED CITY SO. BURLINGTON
40 FARRELL STREET • - • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • TEL (802) 864-0126
October 26, 1972
City of South Burlington
1181 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attention: Mr. William G. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: P. A. Job No. 7223
Gentlemen:
Further to our recent report on the sewers in Imperial Drive
and Laurel Drive, we now submit further information on the
elevation of the Imperial Drive sewer relative to the existing
12" sewer in Shelburne Road. The information was compiled from
actual invert elevations where manhole covers could be removed.
The invert of the Shelburne Road sewer opposite Imperial Drive
was calculated using a gradient of 2.533% from the lower manhole.
The upstream invert could not be obtained because the cover has
recently been paved over.
M H. 1Nv 137.60
G2,'8"SE
GIZA,DE 0.2
oc _
"o
62' +
COVER PAVED
OVER �
M.H
LU
a
�
aI
J
W
NI
to
W
a
,
g
M
I
e
_
( M. H
338�+
I
i12"SEWER G¢/,DE 2.5337.
CAL.CULAZTED INV. 12" M. H NEAR M° NOSH NWOR
SEWER 135.42 INY 12G.96
October 26, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 2
A sewer laid from Manhole 2 in Imperial Drive at a gradient
of 1 in 105 (0.95%) will reach the Shelburne Road sewer with an
invert elevation of 135.73. The relative capacities of new 8
inch and 10 inch sewers laid at this gradient are as follows:
8" dia. pipe tradient
1/105 0.95%)
10" dia. pipe radient
1/105 (0.95%)
FLOWING FULL
575 GPM
1043 GPM
68% OF PIPE
DEPTH
460 GPM
835 GPM
We trust this is the additional information you require.
Very truly yours,
PAULSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Arthur W. Parkes
AWP/meo
P.S. We estimate the 8 inch sewer located in front of the John
Hancock office to have the following capacity when calculated
using the same criteria as was used in the previous report.
FLOWING FULL 68% OF PIPE
DEPTH
8" dia. sewer with grade of
0.274% 247 GPM 198 GPM
r
City of South Burlington
WATER DEPARTMENT
400 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
TEL. 864-4361
July 31, 1980
Mr. Steve Page
Dubois & King Inc.
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
RE: Stonehedge Cluster "A"
Dear Steve,
I have reviewed the above referenced plans and made a few
changes which should clarify the approval. Attention should
be given to the changes on the Service Line Typical and the
installation of an additional valve.
If you have any question please give me a call.
Sincerely,
SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT
Robert L. Gardner
Superintendent
RG/sb
cc: Ed Blake
Bill Szymanski
Dave Spitz -
*"-
City of South Burlington
1175 WILLISTON ROAD
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
TEL.863-2891
October 3, 1978
Glenwood Corporation.
198 College Stred't
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attn: Mr. Mervin Brown
Dear Merv:
OFFICE OF
CITY MANAGER
WILLIAM J. SZYMANSKI
I have been informed by Edward Blake, of the City Water
Department, that the water main has tested satisfactory and is
acceptable , except for the following:
1. The hydrant south of approximately station 10+50
must be raised.
2. A plan showing the main location, including the main
line valves and service shut -offs, to the existing
four unit dwelling.
3. The deed of the water mains serving the. existing
cluster "C" shall not include the cluster meter vault.
This vault is to remain in the ownership of the
Cluster "C" Association.
4. The 8" meter and vault are to become the property
of the City Water Department.
5. Furnish a plan of the water main easement with
adequate information to field locate the easement.
(Similar to the sewer easement.)
6. The water main easement to be 10' each side of the
main in width or a total width of 20 feet.
In order to expedite the issuance of a building permit I
recommend the following amounts be included in the escrow agree-
ment to cover the above referenced work:
Joe t�1
Glenwood Corporation
Mr. Mervin Brown t.
Page 2
1. $ 400.00
2. $1,000.00
3. None
4. None
5. $ 500.00
6. None
Total $1,900.00
In addition to the above you had agreed to escrow twenty
six hundred dollars ($2,600.00) for the installation of the
two fire hydrants.
There is .an outstanding bill due the City Water Department in
the amount of twelve hundred dollars ($1,200.00) for work and
repairs to date on this private line.
This amount must also be paid.
Very/truly your, '
William J. �S2� anski
City Manager
WJS/b
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Files of Hurley Condominiums, Glenwood, Larkin Apartments,
Meadowood at Spear, Meadowbrook Condominiums
From: SSP
Re: "Loose ends" to be resolved on rater lines with CWD
Date: 9/13/78
Before release of bonds or any further approvals on these
projects, Ed Blake should be contacted.
LISMAN & Us MAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
191 COLLEGE STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402
LOUIS LISMAN 802-864-5756
BERNARD
ISMAN
ROBERT ELMANCHESTER
October 6, 1978
CARL H. LISMAN
ALLEN D. WEBSTER
Mr. Stephen Page
Planner
City of South Burlington
Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont
M,P- NWOM
Dear Steve:
In connection with this matter, I am enclosing a copy
of the Escrow Agreement, revised to some extent, for
execution by Glenwood Corp., the City and whichever bank
is to act as the escrow agent. The draft enclosed names
the Burlington Savings Bank as the escrow agent. If you
will be so kind as to complete Schedule A, which I under-
stand refers only to the installation of the fire hydrants,
and the landscaping, and discuss Yr,,Mr. Brown the proposed
completion date, we will then complete\the agreement and
distribute it for execution.
V!ry tr l ours,
i
Carl H. Lisman
CHL:ces
Enc.
1 FILE NO. 04-14-005
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
DISCHARGE PERMIT
N° 3-015.
NAME OF PERMITTEE:
Adcom Inc.
1579 Spear St.
Address) S. Burlington,
Vermont
Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter specified, the above
named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge waste into the
waters of the state pursuant to 10 V.S.A. S911a.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Location of Discharge:
City of South Burlington, East of Twin Orchards Development.
2. Receiving; Waters:
Minor tributaries of Potash Brook, designated Class B water
and further designated as pristine stream.
3. Manner of Discharge:
Discharge pipes into stream
4. Wastes Permitted:
Storm water only after treatment in catch basins designed
to remove settleable and floating material.
5. Volumes Permitted:
Such volumes as required to dispose of normal storm drainage.
s
6. Frequency of Lscharre:
Daily
7. Operation and Treatment Requirements:
y passage through catch
All storm water shall e treate
basins designed with. submerged inlet. And outlet pipes
to remove settleable solids and all floatable material.
8. Maintenance Requirements:
None
9. Personnel and Training Requirements:
None ,
10. Monitorinn and Re ortinr Re uirements:
None
11. r,iscellaneous Requirements:
None
July 1, 1975
Note: This permit, unle.:
12. Expiration Date:
revoked, shall be valid until the designated expiration date despite any
intervening change in water quality, effluent or treatment standards or
the classification of the receiving waters. However, any such changed standard
or classification shall be applied in determining whether or not to renew
the permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. s9lla(e).
r
6
lM
13. Revocation: 10 V.S.A. §913a provides as follows:
"The department may revoke any permit issued by it pursuant
to this subchapter if it finds that the permit holder
submitted false or inaccurate information in his application
or has violated any requirement, restriction or condition
of the permit issued. Revocation shall be effective upon
actual notice thereof to the permit holder."
14. Transfer of Permit: This permit shall not be transferred without
the prior written approval of the Vermont Department of Water Resources.
15. Date of Permit: April 19, 1973
VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
By
,Commissioner
;r�
May 23,
I �
is 1. 0 R% N D U M
South-urlington Planning Coi-uaission
'.11iara J. Szymans�-U, City Tianager
Glenwood, Adcendum to Stipulations for final roval
'Is a result of thr� meeting with Dick Gucciardi, T3ob Tdnc., George
TTF::al and Llo-,rd on May 21, the following r_ecommeneations are made to
the stipulations for final approval of Glenwood Plot Plan -dated 'May
ill, 1n'78.
I. VIater Sewer -on -site
(a) wilt plans to include `',later ane. Surer services to
,a:;isting cluster "C" units to include excavation zoriz
to determine location and materials uses.
(c) Delete "after the first lh have been issues?" this ,:pork
is to be cone b<� fore any now u_zits are -)uilt .
2. '; titer £< Se>aer- off -site
(b) Prior to any construction that tha Laurc-1 %:ill Driv:.-
sewer M.H. 7 c 8 as determined in the Paulson Tzeorort
be gauges in this area to determine the e.,act e.,;:4k--r7,
capacity and if improvements are necessary to acc---
omodate the anticipated units that the necessary
corrections be made. This work to be cone by a
registered professional engineer at the developers
e.,pense.
3. Storm Drainage
(a) Existing storm drainage shall be inspected and app-
roved by the city prior to any adc-itional construction.
(b) Design of drainage s17stem, ditch cross-section, profile,
line ' shall be submitted for approval and worts, compl 11tee
prior to building construction.
r-,. Mi scellan,,-sous
I -could recom^Zt�nd that the main loop road be a cit,, street
i.ctuding the portion constructed. This portion -:routs? re-
NoW,4e - iicl ening to a 30 feet paves width plus cur T-.s .
ILdemorandum Re: Suggestee Stipulat --ions for final ap,)roval of Glen,,Tocd Final Plat
May 19, 197B
Page 2
The original plan was for a private water systern. A
meter vault with a meter -7as installed along side of the
eti- �11r, public street. The status of this meter should be cle-
terminee if the system, is to be public. The limits of
the public system (if system is to be publi.c) will be
determined by the City Water Department in respect to
the service to each cluster.
3. Storm Drainage
(a) Proper functioning of e.Usting storm s- - t7stem shall be
checked, ane must be approved prior to issuance of any
permits after the initial. 16 units.
(b) Drainage improvements on Moser property shall 'a- compLete(f,,
if owner's permission can be obtained,
prior to issuance of
any permits after the initial 16 units,
(c) Channeli7e ditch flowing north to I -loser.
(d) Repair erosion. at north -.,,Test corner of Existing loon road.
(e) Drainage pipes, culverts and drainage structures should
be the responsibility of those responsible for maintaining
the road network.
A
Lands
bond or escroii agreement at $292/unit.
r, , "C"
Ped.-Easement - move off of cluster
6. Misc.
(a) pavement .,7idtb - P.C. reserves right to require widening of
loop road at later phases.
(b) schoolkids -- o.k.
(c) articlas of assoc. - review by- Spokes
(d) specify project & loop road names
(6) execut,:, private road agreement
M phasing: 2 phase over 3 years
(g) revised parking for cluseter "C"
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Bill Szymanski* Steve Page
Re: Suggested Stipulations for final approval of Glenwood Final Plat
Date: May 19, 1978
1. 14*ater & Sewer -on -Site
(a) Get "as-builts" for sewer and water mains prior to issuance
of an- pc-,xmits. This can be done by noting revisions on
construction plans.
(b) Bond for additional hydrants as per recommendations of
Fire Chief.
(c) Specify meter locations for each cluster.
(d) T-later and sewer mains, including new hydrants, are to be
brought UP to city standards, inspected, ap1proved, and
deedeC to the city, prior to any ad<itional permits, after
the first 16 have been issued.
(e) 'The city shall immediately request sewer & water easements
for the mains serving cluster "Col.
(f) All service connections shall be eiagremmed for neu units,
as well as cluster "Cit. (can be sho,,,,,,n on as builts).
2. 1-later & Sewer - Off -Site
(a) It is not feasible to "loop" the Glenwood water main with
the Laurel Hill area water lines. Therc,, is the danger that
someone May accidently open a valve or not close a valve#,,
cOMPlc-?telY causing excessive high pressures especially
along Sheltu-rne lioad and in Shelburne now that they are
connected to the Champlain Water District. The Champlain
Water District has the potential "or interconnecting and
controlling the pressures in the two service areas in thF:',
event of a emergency through their pumping facilities at
the District filtration plant.
N ' ,A
fter permits for 48 units have been issued and they
are occupied, the Laurel Hill Drive sewer flow ,,Will, bf
gauged in a manner similar to the method used in the
Paulsen h:ssociates Report. If, in the City Engineer's
opinion, the flol,,' measured in this f,-.iBhion exceeds his
estimates, then the improvements to the Laurel Hill Drjvr�
sewer shall. be comple
ted. These inprovemehts consistk'Of
installing another 8 inch line parallel to the existing line
and, shall. bonded for in the. amount Of W,,000- If, in
the City Engineer's opinion, there is sufficient crpacit.v
in the Laurel Hill sewer line to accomodate the balance -
of the Phase I unitF (24), he -.trill allo-_7 perm
.ts for these
,
units to be issued without recTudring construction of tile,
m
above mentioned il-ai)rOveents. ' The bone' for thLesc I,- lip rovements
be retained in anticipation -,f further construction in
Phase IT.
P
o� U
R
i
3'-
Sc' th Durlinp-ton Planninr- Com-rissio i
South Burlir.Uton,.•Vermon.t 05401
Attention: Dir. ;,,7illia7. ;des -self, Chairman j
Gentlemen: a�
I have met with I-'essrs . Pare and Szymanski on several occasions
since Ydy 1, 1978 in ar attempt to resolve Natters which are
concerns to the Cedar Glen T-Jorth Condinum Association re;zardin-
the development known to date as the wlervrood Development.
The items of concern which are open between South Burlington and
the Cedar ;Glen North Association are as follows:
1 . As -built drawincrs for the underground utilities or
Cedar Glen 1.orth property.
2.. All under.C-round utilities are to be turned over to the
City of South Burlinr-ton for maintenance and operation.
3. Project Base Line - it is to be established by documentation,
the interfaces between_ the former_ Cedar Glen North and new Glenwood
projects, where the City of South Burlington is concerned.
I ,
4. Parkirg - there is inadequate parkin`• at Cedar Glen
T:orth, Cluster "C". A small parkins lot has been built by
the road east of Cluster "C" for their use. Should Cluster "C"
lose use of this parkin* lot, parkingr on the roadway will be
inevitable .
3
It is oexpected that item .13 above will reveal a myriad of problems
which must be solved before the Glenwood project car, proceed, i.e.,
there :is not a right-of-wav for the sewer to cross Cedar Glen
North,_ Cluster "C" property to Laurel Hill.
To this end, it is respectfully requested that the present Glenwood
Development plan not be approved until the above items have been
mutually dispositioned between the concerned parties.
Very truly yours,
ueorCe L. al, President
CEDAR GLE1,. 7�"ORTH ASSOCIATIO.1_
i
G lip:: e e m
c.c. h:r . S to pier PaCe .
1..r ;�illiar Szymanski
e
U
P
L
68 Laurel Hill Drive
So. Burlington, Vt. 05401
MEMO
References:
.-NAC" IS iir- ICE
. ITY SC;. z 11,
1. Planning Commission meeting minutes dated April 25, 1978, page 3, item
5 (meeting with residents).
2. Your memo of the meeting to the Planning Commission dated May 5, 1978.
3. Letter of R. Gucciardi regarding same meeting (to Planning Commission
Chairman) dated May 9, 1978.
May 12, 1978
William J. Szymanski, City Engineer
1175 Williston Road
So. Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Bill:
The proposed Glenwood Development (formerly Cedar Glen North) has been a
matter of controversy for a considerable length of time. The meeting be-
tween you and the residents was made a condition of preliminary plat approval
to resolve as much of the controversy as possible and to identify those matters
still unresolved. Your memo is not clear as to whether resolution was reached
or what remained to be clarified. R. Gucciardi's letter did not clarify the
results of the meeting either, but it referenced another meeting to be held.
For what reason?
I recognize that the legal, technical and neighborhood complexities involved
take a lot of your time, but I hope -they can be resolved. There is just enough
confusion that I -do not feel I can approve the project at the next step. I am
further convinced that more Planning Commission public hearings will be exercises
in frustration (for all parties) unless the air is cleared. If it is the intention
of the citizens' group to oppose this development no matter what, that is one
thing, but if the opposition relates to specific (technical) matters that can be
resolved, your activity i.s warranted..
Sincerely,
George J. Mona, Planning Commissioner
/vm
cc: W. Wessel, Chairman, Planning Commission
-->S. Page, City Planner
May 9, 1978
South Burlington Planning Commission
Attention: Mr. William Wessel
Chairman
Re: Glenwood Development
Gentlemen:
Per your direction a group of residents from Laurel Hill and Cedar Glenn North
met with Bill Szymanski on May 2, 1978. It should be noted that although
many topics were discussed no agreements could be reached since pertinent
documents were not readily available. It was, however, suggested by Bill that
he be allowed to meet with the city lawyer and accummulate the necessary
documents and meet with us at a later date. We all agreed that a base line
of the entire development (Cedar Glenn North and Glennwood) was essential in
order for all parties to understand where the various responsibilities lie.
For your information listed below were some of the many topics discussed and
not resolved:
1. Has the developer received Act 250 approval? If so, does it
reflect the current changes from the original development such
as: 140'T-
a. Age requirement.Y95'--
b. Drainage.
C. Sewage.'',
d. Water.
e. Type of dwelling.
2. Did the city of South Burlington approve all of the above changes
prior to the developer's request for state approval? If so, the
documents were not available. Were these changes made known to
the public and how/when. Bill Szymanski indicated that the changes
were publicized in the newspaper and that he would provide us with
the dates.
3. With regard to the sewage, the data developed by the Laurel Hill
citizens (see attachment A) which indicated problem areas in the
sewage system on Andrews Road, Imperial Drive and Shelburne Road
was confirmed by the Paulsen Report dated October 18, 1972. It
should be noted that the Paulsen Report also indicated a potential
problem in the Oak Hill, Cranwell Drive sewer system. It should be
noted that we the citizens asked Bill if a definitive corrective
action plan was available. Bill indicated there was no plan and could
not tell us when one would be available. However, he did state, the
Mr. William Wessel, ChAirman
May 9, 1978
Page 2
,PG-�1 ' l-
�\ sewage system would be monitored and when trouble developed they
would correct it. We the citizens pointed out to Bill that this
t� --Va 7; was not acceptable. We felt that the problems should be defined
Q�DN� and corrected prior to further development. In two visits to
�rZ.t'461 City Hall we could find no clear paper work to define who has the
µ responsibility for the design and scheduling of correcting the
sewage problems. It is important to note it is our feeling that
without the above mentioned, it would not be possible to develop
a realistic bond value.
4. The following question was asked and no answer received. How could
Mr. Potter get out of his bond obligation for corrections necessary
on Oak Hill/Cranwell Drive and the Andrews/Imperial Drive sewers.
The purpose of this question was to insure that we did not get
into the same situation in the future.
In summary, when we left Bill Szymanski, he promosed to get back with us and
provide us the documents which contain the answers to our questions and that
he would clearly define the base line from which this new development would
proceed. Therefore, we strongly recommend that final approval be withheld
until suitable action is taken to resolve the above problems to the best
interest of the city and citizens of South Burlington.
Very truly yours,
ftux".
R. . Gucciardi
24 Andrews Road
South Burlington, VT 05401
P.S. It should be noted that Mr. George Neal, President
of the Cedar Glenn North Cluster "C" Association,
was also present at this meeting, he is representing
a group of (15) home owners and will address their
problems under separate cover to you, therefore, this
memo should not be considered to be all inclusive. I
understand from Mr. Neal that he has scheduled
separate meetings with Bill Szymanski to discuss
resolutions to their problems. Please feel free to
call me at any time at my home, 862-4381 or at my
work, 658-1500, extensions 6020, 6474 or 6147.
ATTACHMENT A
letter
to R
'
^
�rltL y �o",A
of May
9,
j) JLlj ✓V
�g4%IGYi"lOd iI
S. &,
►�y ,�
%.DICK
L)
GwecM o/
Ken if►IdreA�.
14
y3.so
4,00
oC
66
90.67
�
�,�
•bpi/
I 'J
I
n it
-
..
-•
A) d A S
CN�
----PC
Ll
.
9 4. c/ 3
y Q, 6 /J
G4 u,3 z
,492/„
M E M O
TO: Planning Commission
RE: Cedar Glen North Cluster "C"
FROM: William J. Szymanski
DATE: May 5, 1978
On Tuesday, May 2,1978, I met with representatives of Cedar
Glen North, Cluster "C" and the Laurel Hill neighborhoods.
They expressed their concerns as to the work completed to date
on the first -phase -of the former Potter Development. That phase of
work is mostly complete. A final inspection was never requested,
therefore the utilities that were to be city maintained were
never inspected and accepted by the City. My records show that
there are some funds still being held in escrow for this purpose
and for the preparation of the as built -drawings.
There were questions regarding the Act 250 permit status and
as to the change in the project age limit.restrictions that were
removed.,,a few years ago. It is my understanding that all state
permits have been issued and the age limit restriction was removed
at a District Enviromental hearing a couple of years ago together
with the restrictions that were a part of the condition for
acceptance of the park land by the City.
We discussed the sewer report prepared by Paulsen Associates.
I don't feel that there has been any significant change in the
area of study to warrent a new study and that the recommendations
in the report be followed. Those are that the_area.sewered into
the Laurel Hill Drive sewer be limited to a"maximum of 68 units
after which the area in question be regauged to see what additional
capacity can be'added. The Paulsen report assumes the same flow
throughout the section studied. The area in question is consider-
ably upstream from the point of gauging.
Prior to the use of the Imperial Drive sewer section in question,
which'is:at the entrance to the Shelburne Road sewer. That sewer
shall be reconstructed as per the Paulsen report.
In summary I feel that the portion of the utilities built be
inspected by the City and the required corrections made and that
the determination be made as to what will be deeded to the City.
That corrections be made to the construction drawings showing the
as built . That the units to be sewered by the Laurel Hill sewer
be limited to 48 additional units and the section of sewer in
question be re-evaluated and that the sewer on Imperial Drive
be constructed prior to additional units added to that line.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
FREDERiCK H. TUTTLE
Superintendent
LAWRENCE E. LECOURS
Assistant Superintendent
"Ir. Carl It. Lisman
Lisman and Lisman
Attorreys at La:;
191 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Lisman,
OFFICE: SOUTH BURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL
5W Dorset street
April 13, 1978
At their regular meeting on April 12, 1978, the South Burlington School
Directors voted that the Glenwood Corporation - Cedar Glen Development, as out-
lined in your letter dated March 20, 1978, would not place an unreasonable bur-
den on this municipality to provide educational services.
Because of the concern for the s,ifety of our students, it is reciuested
that sidewalks he provided in conjunction with the roads to he constructed.
This will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. T am enclosing
a copy of our transportation policy for your information, please note item #4
under the administrative guidelines - "Buses will not be routed over private
roads".
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely yours,
Frederick If. Tuttle
Superintendent of Schools
FIIT:cl
enc.
cc: fir. Curtis W. Carter
Mr. Stephen Pare
Mr. John I1. Lucas
HOPWOOD
My comments pertain to details which can be shown on the final
plat or included as a condition of approval.
47 BUSINESS PARK NORTH FINAL PLAT
The primary issue remaining is the build -out rate of this sub-
division relative to existing and anticipated traffic congestion at*
the Kennedy Drive intersections with Kimball Ave. and Williston Rd.
The conditions of preliminary plat approval included a provision
that development be phased, with appropriate levels of service and
decree of phasing to be decided at final plat review. The developer
has suggested a timetable for development as follows: 1076 - 3
parcels; 1979 - 3 parcels; 1980 - 2 parcels; 1981 - 2 parcels. I
concur with his contention that it is not appropriate to ap-ly a
level of service standard for the follovinc reasons:
1) we have not adopted a city --,side functional roadway class-
ification system.
2) the developer will be penalized by such a standard as
I traffic from outside the community increases, as well as
by traffic generated by projects subsequently an-. -roved by the
Commission throughout South Burlington.
3) the four year phasing plan will dive the cit-y e fir:-r
beseline on which to program improvements to the t",o affected inter-
sections.
4) imoosition of a level of service condition. only, -ithout
phasing, will force the subdivider to sell and develop tre lots as
soon -as possible, before increasing congestion prevents him from
co7Tpleting the project.
Two cther minor issues can be resolved: first, there -.c-s a
cu.-estion on soils of lot 10, viliich cen be allevietr:d by removing.
unsuitable soils as necessary and replacing -.ith gocd quality fill;
secondly, the alignment of access to lcts 9 and 10 (on »illiston
Road), with the National Guard Road has been shown. I co not believe
it is feasible or practical to require alignment of these curb cuts
:ith one another, given the layout of existing property lines, as :ell
as ^rude Houghton's advice that this intersection may still be
signallized, despite the offset.
,eo GLErr°,'OOD
See encicsed m,?_Tno from �-US and myself, plus letter from
George Neal.
M ) 2.
PLANNING COM4ISSION APRIL 11, 1978
access and Hinesburg Road is great enough to signallize the access if the
city wanted. -:to: Mr. Poger said the access could rake a right angle with
Williston Road and then curve and hug the property line. r. Page said Xr.
Shaw had felt the only awl -ward movementP7
would be people coming left out of
I e property and then turning right into White St. 3;r. Morency felt the
signal at Hinesburg Road could give them time to do that. Mr. Schzucker
said that the Subdivision Regulations require an angle of 800 on a street
with public use, but he said this was a private right of -,.Tay and he asked
tti.at the Conmission rot consider the SGO angle when two traffic engineers
!rave said it is insignificant. He said the road could be altered later. _<r.
�cg;er asked if it would be a hardship to rake it a right angle with 'Williston
Road and N'r. Schmuc'_ker said it would. 3%r. Mona felt t^ere should be a large
turning radius on the east side of the access ;here it exits to the road.
SctiTucker said they would have Brace Boughton lay out the •approach. Mr.
`aoclery asked if the building could be ex ended and r.r. Sch:--ucker said they
Mould artificially reimpose the line t^at existed when this vas a three -lot
subdivision if the Com- ission wanted, to insure that trey could r_ot ea,:nd
a lot. i-r. Poger moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Morency seconded
the motion, which passed with all in favor. Yr. Levesque cane in. Xr.
Foolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
preliminary plat application for a 2 lot subdivision of the Morgan _property,
draw-n by Y CG, rev. 3 12/78, subject to the following stipulations:
1) The provisions in the "Agreed Statement of Facts", it - 10, shall
apply, and be shown on the final plat, as appropriate.
2) Final utilities review shall be performed by the City engineer.
3) The following required imprcve_r ents are waived: streets, curbs,
sidewalks, street signs, outdoor lighting, and landscaping.
4) Further development of lot 2 is predicated on level of service
"C" conditions during peak pm. rcadway hour for all approaches to the
Ni_lliston Road - Dorset St. intersection and the cinesburg Road - Yilliston
Road - Patchen Road intersection, and upgrading of the access drive to a
city street.
5) The site plan shall be a -••ended
easterly side of the access road.
;e Motion was seconded by hi Morency,
to show a larger curb radius on the
and pissed unanimously.
_Continue public bearing on preliminary plat spolication of the Glenwood_
Corporation, Kr. Terrance Boyle
Ifs. Boyle described the plan snd !•r. Page said that 'he had given c-ut
infor.7-ation to the residents of Laurel Hill. Mr. "esnel slid t::at Y-r.
Szymanski reviewed the sever situation and does not think the sit�jation has
chr-nE;ed significantly since the Paulsen'report ;res written. Apprcval is
c.-,nti_ngent on ttje develclier bording for sc-.er ='r. Fa a said
t=.e sewer line was i_nadeq::ate to serve V: e entire 200 units prcposei but
it could handle a portion of the first 1.:.-ase of the project. -e cE:elol.-r
'.as agread that City =all can cjaeck t%•e flcv :,elcw t e level tl.at is expected
to fill the pipes to tease sure ti.at Vie ea�;ine_ring esti=aces _&tch vhi!t is
act::ally in the field. Le said t:.e ex --sting lines czu'sd %._ndle son-e a3.iiticr.-1
(.a
f l
. - s 3 .
PUNNING COICiISSION
APRIL 11, 1978
capacity but that some improvements would be needed before it could take the
lead of the -entire 200 units. Mr. Mona wondered if the improvements should
be made before the construction began and Yr. Page said Mr. Szymanski did
not think it was necessary to require the improvements until later in the
project, when they would be needed. Ifs. Page said the Commission could
require bonding at the outset of the project if they wished. Mr. Morency
did not think it made ._sense to allow 92 units when the sewer could not handle
them. I;',r. Boyle said that there was enough capacity for 60 units going
through Cakhill Drive. After they build 50 units, they will take measurements
and see if they can build any more. If they cannot, they will go into the
Endrews Avenue system which has capacity for a few more units before it will
have to nave improvements :jade to it, which they will pay for when the time
comes. ?fir. Carl Lisman said it was important to realize that the additional
units would not be started until the sewer issue was resolved. AIr. Yona asked
if after the first 50 units are built, they would come back to the Commission
and discuss the rest. Mr. Lisman said the City Engineer was better qualified
to make the decision as to when to stop adding to the line than the Commission.
:f`r. Mona did not think it would be prudent of the Commission to authorize
-use of non-existent city services and I,r. Wessel said the question was whether
the Commission wanted to delegate some authority or not. Mr. Morency felt
it was an engineering decision and he wanted to leave it to the City Engineer.
Messrs. foolery, 'Vessel and Levesque agreed. ?t',r. Xorency said the Commission
could stipulate that Mr. Szymanski check the flow before he issued permits and
14r. Ilona said that would be good.
?:r. Woolery said that the lower end of the ditch on the property seemed
to get filled up pretty regularly and he said that with more covered area,
the runoff would be faster. Who would take care of clef-ning the drainage
ditch? .'r. Boyle said it would clean itself naturally. Ifs. Donald Loser
said that when that ditch came out onto his property it was at the surface
level and the water was no longer chani.eled and it fanned out onto the back
corner of his house lot. He said he would like the plan for runoff water
to be appropriate for the maintenance of the property. Mr. Boyle said that
could be corrected•at Ifs. Moser's lot line and he said the developer would
do it by working on the south end of the drainage parcel. Mr. Woolery asked
who would maintain the ditch on the Glenwood property and was told the
developer would. A4r. Morency suggested the Commission take a look at the
property and a date and time was set for that. Kr. Boyle felt there was
less coverage of the land in this plan than in the previous one because the
roof area is smaller and the parking lots are gravel. Mr. Wessel asked yr.
*loser to beet with the developer and work out a solution for the drainage
probelm for the next meeting. Mr. Poger moved to continue the public hearing
until April 25, 1978 at 7:30 pm at City Hall. A`r. A;orency seconded the motion,
and it passed unanimously.
Site Plan Feview, conversion of Robert Hall Building to office buildir.
I'.essrs. Bouchard and Pizzagalli
Mr. Bouchard said that they would like to revitalize the existing old
Robert Hall building for office purposes. The building is 120' x 70' cn a
lot with 300' of depth and 200' of frontage. One of tl a present curb cuts
(the easterly one) will be closed and t e parking spaces will be rearranged.
They have 44 parking spaces and 42 are required. They are also going to
landscape a 15' strip of land with trees. As far as the sidewalk, he said
that usually a city will pay for Lalf of that and he suggested this be done.
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items
Date: April 7, 1978
Morgan Subdivision
I believe the only issue still unresolved is the location of
the access point. I have mailed a packet of information to Bob
Shaw of Wilbur Smith Associates, who will be telephoning me
Tuesday with his recommendations.
Glenwood
Bill 3ymanski's memo regarding sanitary sewers, water supply,
and storm drainage was sent to you last week. A packet of infor-
mation, which addresses many of the questions raised by the Laurel
Hill area residents last time, has been sent to the group's re-
presentative. Also, I will be meeting with the group prior to
Tuesday's meeting.
With regard to traffic generation (raised at the last meeting),
I estimate this project will account for .4-.8 2 way trips/D.U.
during either the morning or evening peak roadway hour. Spear
Street, by 1977 counts, carries 2400 + cars per day (24 hours) and
during the p.m. peak hour carries approximately 270 vehicles.
If roadway width remains an issue, you might consider a stip-
ulation that if the road does not work out in practice due to its
narrowness, that the city retain the right to require widening to
a particular width retroahively.
The number of anticipated school children is being re-examined
by the School Board - a formal decision will be reached by the
Bcerd on the 13th or 14th of this month.
Robert Hall Site Plan
This proposal is to convert the vacant Robert Hall building
for use as an office. Total renovation costs are estimated at
$15,000, the bulk of which is devoted to interior work, although
there will be some cosmetic work on the building's exterior.
Traffic access is improved - 1 curb cut is to be closed. Cir-
culation and parking are adequate. Landscaping is improved and
exceeds the requirements of the ordinance. No screening is nec-
essary. The applicant has agreed to pay half the cost of constructing
a sidewalk across the frontage. I feel this is appropriate due to
the fact this is a building conversion, not new construction. Bill
Szymanski disagrees with me, and would like the entire sidewalk
installed by the developer. Total sidewalk cost is estimated at
$1,000.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
RE: Glenwood Development
DATE: March 31, 1978
1. SEWERS: Enclosed is a summary of a sewer capacity report
prepared by Paulsen Associates in October, 1972.
This summary was prepared for the Planning Commission
in December, 1972. Since there has not been any
significant development in the area, that would
effect the report, the findings should apply.
2. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm runoff will enter the drainageway
flowing northerly as shown in the plan
prepared by Engineers Inc. dated January,
1973. The maximum width of channel downstream
can be determined by a field survey of the
area where this information is requested.
3. WATER: The development is served by the City's high service
system from the 24 inch Champlain Water District main
on Swift Street, by a 12 inch main southerly on Spear
Street and a 8 inch main to the development is
approximately 100 PSI.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
71 7/7 '�-
SUMMARY OF THE PAULSEN ASSOCIATION REPORT
ON THE CAPACITY OF THE SEWER LINES
SERVING THE POTTER DEVELOPMENT
An electronic recording instrument recording sewage flow
over a week period was installed in the sewer lines on Imperial
Dr. and on Laurel Hill Dr.
The gauge on Imperial Dr. recorded a peak flow of 184 gallons
per minute. On Laurel Hill Dr. the peak flow was recorded at
119 gallons per minute.
Elevations at each sewer manhole on the lines that could
serve the Potter Development were taken. From this data slopes
and capacities of the lines flowing full and at 68 percent were
determined. Additional capacity of lines based on 68 per cent
of pipe capacity is used in this summary.
It was estimated that the Potter type of development would
house an average of three people per unit with a peak sewage
flow of 1.04 gallons per minute per unit.
The most zritical line serving Laurel Hill South is a
length of 62 feet parallel to Shelburne ad.where the sewer makes
a 90° turn before it crosses Shelburne Rd. to the main sewer
along the west side of the road. This line has a peak capacity
of 198 gallons per minute less the peak flow of 184 gallons per
minute or a spare of 14 gallons per minute. This would allow an
additional 13 units.
The next critical section is a 310' length that feeds the
62 foot length along Imperial Dr. This length has a peak flow
of 262 gallons per minute, a spare capacity of 78 gallons per
minute or 75 additional units.
The construction of a new line in this area would increase
the sewer capacity in this area by an additional 460 gallons per
minute. If this were done the next critical section is a 466
foot length on Andrews Ave. Having a spare capacity of approx-
mately 234 gallons per minute or approxamately 225 units.
The controlling sewer line serving Laurel Hill North is a
section on Laurel Hill Dr. between Black Lantern Ln. and
Cranwell Pky. This line has a capacity of 185 gallons per minute.
Assuming the peak gauged amount of 119 gallons per minute passes
through this line which is a conservative assumption, because the
line is up stream a considerable distance, the line would
have a spare capacity of 66 gallons per minute or an additional
63 units.
The report also states that the sewer serving Laurel Hill
South has an infiltration rate of approximately 76 gallons per
minute or 41 per cent of the sewerage flow.
The sewer serving Laurel Hill North has an infiltration
of approximately 22.5 gallons per minute or 19 per .cent of the
sewerage flow.
Pace 2
ie::►or a ndirn
7:e: Next meeting's Agenda Items
Date: I•'larch 23, 1978
(a) The number of curb cuts on "A1's" lot will be progressively,
reduced as subdivision and development proceeds, doom to a minimum or
one curb cut. The Planning commission still retains the ability,
under site plan review, to further restrict access to this lot. This
will occur only if the use on this lot changes, or the building is
e::panded - which I feel is a certainty in the foreseeable future.
Similarly, the service access over the set.:er easement could be obtained
zt site plan review as ,cell.
(b) the ;11provements to the Dorset St. - 1-;illiston Rd. inter-
section are to begin April 24. As we have previously been told,
the added capacity to the Dorset Street approach will be consumed
by the additional development that has occurred siInce the traffic
1y75 counts +were made Ho—,.jever, the :+illiston Road approaches to this
intersection, through i4hich most I-i.das traffic will be flot•:ing,
are expected to provide sufficient additional capacity for I-iidas.
I feel it is the city's responsibility to ascertain whether these
approaches will also be able to accomodate the development that has
occurred since the counts :sere taken.
(c) with regard to the accident problem in the vicinity of
I;cDonaIds, I believe this is of nominal importance to 2�Iidas because
this business has little or no noonti.r:ie peaking characteristic,
unlike the eateries in the "gaiint1✓t" area to the tlast.
I will prepare a map and list of conditions or agreements to
X'aciiitate your review, and possible approval of this project Tuesca
evening.
ta�t�er►znt of facts" for more details.
Refer to the developer's "s
Glenwood
T�apcation is restricted to the 92 unit first phase -
the balance of the project will be submitted for preliminary and
final review at a later date.Eonsequently, we may reach some under-
standings about the conceptual lav-out of the entire project, but
the scope of this review is limited to the first 92 units.
I am satisfied with the layout of the project, except for minor
details 1•1hich will be su imitted to you in list form, Tu= sday evening.
The plan has been reviewed by the city engineer and Fire Chief. I
feel compelled to take issue with the Chief' s recom_-nenoa tion for a
30' traveled way throughout. The developer has met uS halway, as
you will see on the drawings, by adding graveled shoulders. I
enclose oocuz:.entation for my opinion that the roadways proposed are
adEouate in width. Finally, you should be aware that the building
permits for this portion of the project (S2 units) are still valid for
the original layout- thus, I feel the co-.- should not ta:;e too
t
in_lexible a stance on the simple physical rearrangement of a previously
approved plan.
OFFICE OF TERRENCE J. BOYLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
t\�vL
J r+
1s. ... =i.,"`.
C. f :7''UF._"1i''G: CN
Mr. William Szymanski
City Manager
So. Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Bill:
301 COLLEGE ST., BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 658-3555
March 20, 1978
Re: Glenwood
(Cedar Glen)
Phase I - Sewer
After reviewing Paulsen's report on page 6 where the flow at
MH 4 - MH 5 is 452 G.P.M. I would assume that the added family
size would be no problem for the existing sewers in Glenwood
that extend through Oak Hill Drive to MH #5.
The only problem might be this section from Oak Hill Drive to
MH #5 in the report and the developer is willing to test to see
if adequate capacity exists after build out, of say 50 units.
If capacity is limited, the remaining 20 units could be re-
designed to plan with the 2nd phase towards Andrews Avenue
(MH #9) which of course would mean the coirtrection of the Shelburne
Road and Imperial Drive problems outlined in Paulsen's summary.
I hope my understanding of the situation is correct and that the
present sewers are adequate for approval of phase I, subject
possibly to the condition you may wish to make that testing
might be required after a partial build out.
TJB/lgl
cc. M.
C.
Brown
Lisman
Sincerely yours,
T rence J . Boyle
RESOURCE PLANNING TOWN AND URBAN DESIGN PARKS AND RECREATION HOUSING ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
,z�tre Prpartment 'rabquartrrs
DORSET STREET
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
863-6455
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. Parch 7, 19 78
Mr. William B. Wessel Chairman
South Burlington Planning Commission
1175 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Wessel,
On Friday March 3, 1978 Mr. Terrence Boyle Architect for
Ceder Glen Development and I had a meeting and review the plans for
phase 1 and the following was found to enable us to give proper fire
protection.
1. There must be three fire hydrants avalible to each cluster of
buildings. Hydrants can be set up to be used for more than one
cluster.
2. Hydrants should be set up just off main road but near the road
leading in to the clusters.
3. Road around ilands in each cluster must be 30 feet wide to have
proper radius to turn equipment around.
4. Distant between buildings should be 30 feet apart.
Over all phase 1 is well planned to enable us to give good fire
protection but because of all the new construction which has been
approved by the planning commision to date, the fire department is
inadequate to meet the cities needs. More equipment, addition to
present station, and two more paid men should be given serious
consideration to assure proper protectionfor the city as a whole.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at
863-6455.
Sincerrrel
G �.'�?4e—
amen W. Goddette Sr. Chief
) I!EMORANDTTM )
TO: South Burlington Planning Corrdssion
FROM: Williun J. Szyraans4,j City Manager
RE: Glenwood Development
DATE: FERRiTARY 28, 1978
1. The perimeter road should be looped for alternate ingress and egress.
2. Runoff from westerly clusters to be discharged to existing stream.
3. Conditions regarding off site sewer reconstruction and others
specified in the Cedar Glen approv2l0 shall apply
Respectfully s bmitted
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re: Next meeting's agenda items
Date: 2/24/78
1. Business Park North
I have met with Gordon McArthur, from the State Highway Department,
and Dick Spokes, concerning traffic and on site sewage disposal, respectively.
I will have additional information to present on both topics at the hearing.
2. Morgan (Al's French Fries) Subdivision
Nothing new has been submitted to date on this application since the
previous meeting. I feel tabling would be appropriate, until additional
information is presented.
3. Palmer Storage Building
Location map and comments previously sent to you.
/4. Chastenay Revised Site Plan
This plan is for an apartment and office building (now under construction)
at the corner of I-189 and Kennedy Drive, which originally showed 20 parking
spaces. In order to save more existing trees, and provide a better approach
to the main parking area, it has been proposed that 5 spaces be deleted.
I feel this is an improvement over the previous plan, and still affords the
required number of spaces (15)•
5. Glenwood Sketch Plan
This is a resubdivision proposal for the former Cedar Glen North
property, now under new ownership. The project entails 181 new townhouse
units, in addition to the 20 existing units. The overall density conforms to
the allowed density of 4 units per gross acre. The impact of the first
phase (92 units) on the most critical municipal facilities is nominal
because: 1) school children have already been factored in by the School
Department in their estimates, 2) sewage capacity is adequate at the Bartlett's
Bay treatment plant and 3) the distance from any signallized or congested
intersection is so great that it would be difficult to assign any
incremental impacts on traffic from this project. The situation is unchanged
with regard to police and fire protection, although water line sizing and
hydrant location will be reviewed by the Fire Chief. In sum, I feel the
primary consideration with regard to Phase I is the physical arrangement
of parking, roads, and buildings (utilities are already in). As for Phase
II, both physical layout and impact on municipal services merit a thorough
review. See attached sketch for location and summery of site and fringe
conditions.
6. Econolodge and ICV Site Plans
The 60 day time clock expires on these projects March 12 and Yarch
17 respectively. I suggest you deny these applications and invite them to
reapply when the various deficiencies are cleared up.
i•
l
r ,
r
E
M
0
R
A
N
D
U
M
To: Interested Parties
From: City of South Burlington
Re: Status of Cedar Glen North Development
':ate: 9/19/77
The purpose of this memo is to describe the status of the
Cedar Glen North Development, with regard to local approvals and
building permits.
I General Information
The project consists of 220 condominium units on approximately
50 acres and has received preliminary approval. 7.5 acres have
been deeded to the city as parkland. A building permit for 92
units has been issued, of which 2V have been built.
r cul-de-sac, with storm drains and water main has been
constructed and accepted by the city. Sewer and water mains, plus
service lines to existing units, have been installed on the north
end of the property; these mains have net yet been inspected or
accepted by the city.
The layout of some roads and tuildings has been modified,
with the consent of the Planning Commission, since the original
r. .
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 2
approval was granted. � plan is on file at City Hall, showing
the location of all buil-~ings and site iTTrevs^ents as an r ov.,o
p d.
II Phase I (Q2 units) nperoval
The permit outstanding (for 71 units) is valid only for the
building types and locations shown on the plan of record, provided
there are no major modifications. Major modifications would
include,
among other things, rearrangement of roads or substantial navel areas,
eas,
larger units, more bedrooms per unit, or relocation of units
Further construction in this phase is subject to an informal
review by the Planning Commission, on a cluster by cluster basis,
Landscaping has been installed only
in cluster "C" and must be completed for the "hillside" units
.
Easements and bills of sale for the sewer and water mains
must be submitted to the city.
Thy following conditions are contained in the findings of
' act as amended by the District Environmental Co^'T�yss;on ^n
. : r_l
15, 1977:
f
h'
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 3
1) The construction rate for the balance of Phase I shall not
exceed lF units for calendar 1977 and 53 units for calendar 1978.
2) The developer shall remove all restrictions on the use of the
parkland to which he is a party.
A private road and waiver agreement will be required for all
private streets, to protect the city from owning or maintaining
these streets until they are upgracea to current municipal design
and construction standards.
Performance bonds or a suitable escrow agreement must be
executed to guarantee the installation of landscaping, sewer, water,
storm drainage, and related site improvements which have not yet
been completed to the city's satisfaction.
III Balance of the nroiect (128 units)
Subdivision approval for this portion of the project has ex -
Aired. Further development Mans for this portion of the property
are subject to major subdivision review under the municipal subdivision
regulations.
S
M
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 4
The engineering inspection fee `'or this portion of the project
has been paid.
No parkland dedication or equivalent fee shall be recuired in
light of the 7.5 acres of parkland previously dedicated.
M
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 4
The engineering inspection fee `'or this portion of the project
has been paid.
No parkland dedication or equivalent fee shall be recuired in
light of the 7.5 acres of parkland previously dedicated.
B.J/JC On.,r, fF
AND ARE BASED
All BE -RINGS ARE MAGNETIC
ON BEARING NIS'27'IO'E TAKEN FROM LAl7REL
HILL SOU—`H P-A45 BY ENGINEERS INC_ of "T_
PROJECT W 8.72
I
1s33 43:a
UFd_,y A B C.,._,?,OrrE,R
Quq+E DaT•
A . as• x*"z� �
tas. Do• Ga'
p 2.1 .2•
5x
T xN
IL ]zoos
2]5a.
I .9/
L Fs rER
v �rB
b ' � zJ B�zyisJ
r P. VA..+S1.aO
Ro
%bcE.q
O �
XA` ,"44
C �Y JJJ S C4yP �F�• . S Q. r A,
`br BJ r 6 4 •... ti.. _ � �
0 B4CC 0+1
gn.
`~ "*
_ M - .Op 4! ~, Jul! A,e" S/
.06Ics
�qA
fro �qs
�O
o ro zQfl soo
A.' I qo so V
C. C rFRa GRA Prl/C SCALE
p J65 7�Z0/4a
M1
•Ir . .
iiiLL C_OCa TQ a_rl C_T T./.. ;rr•
BOUNCAR`! IRt�ORt: _�fi _____
< a 9. 11• / ...lily
PAGCELC CL_`JSTEr 1
���yyy•�•�• _ la in!ormrlion cA,r;n,C
"JYN NC i,iMO • .-- r,j af. _ / ..e..+c. INC
C'-
F
ern.^i. S.� S'.r.EE
NOTE. THIS P'_AN 67A?TED FRC1+ P_AN ENi17l£D 'Ay SOUTH
R,J.,_I y:, TON V'_'NT
T7
B07N7-3T Sd RY ET PRD?ERn PPOP35ED TO BE
•• N. INO DATED J<r. 5, 1972
cCNVE'IED TO ADCO
!L! • �.,� ��� T - •,; 3 tr'i V •�.�_� r „�`' ��� P.G. BGX•21E7`
Tic __. ••.�
V
_S,
CO) f1� o J'JaC�'
11� .�1�.� if�-ram. :i •,!Si (-�.'J�T ;�`.l?^'. •sY
-_j V f
"at�1`
CoT-gnd .(Jez eN
_~. x
'9L6I ^'
;o .C¢p Vi s-q; au azo;aq paz;cz sen azeo T; -zz ao stgy
i
aO a, SILO z`y Oaz az s'6a
tLEi
•Di-nq se ruac.zede aq; ;o svoav -p 7u,z s-- = v wx
-3jede •oc-.a=ol •:noi.¢; ay: szoTdap n-azezn�oe r e .CITn; ve-d sTy:
zeyz pve 'n 1 Xq pazTnbaz 5- I¢nezdde pue 3u:I :; grns ;¢y: 3vazxa
aq; oy •sSu-pl-nq ;o ao.z nzzsuco aqz zo; sz-+L-Tad ;o aovenssT aye
SanO Uc;;�TpsT3n� CU:A¢q UCTST'.TpT.. Ie1Cau��2n0� �24�0 :O .Ca:�edTO
-tune aqt /,q panozdde pva q:-n pal-; s¢ s6u-pl Tnq aq} ;o svald aqz
;o s;:c-;zod ;o Adoo a:a= . v¢ s- _ld too i; sTq-4 zey4 •i;-asao
a�'T �e':-J"'� 2�:e1: Ienp Tn iptT OU anal SCUT�l -4 a17 2-ld a00L; s",-4
ff a cos se z -.v z���-zaCa ca .Cq pa:evc-sap s-
YZcE 9NINIC - YG
35
CSo'Ls - is
ante�� -
xooaE.iE - a
waa - a
ioCY N3F
°JNi_-�Iq - 8'i
x-0C�ZueE - yF
S_GIS -.ti:JE :--j OZ
C g ' C� h
!�
February 14, 11177
henry P. Potter
Adcom, Inc.
1579 Spear Street
South 6urlington, Verront .15401
Dear Mr. Potter,
At their regular meeting on February 1), 1977, the South Burlinvtoji >01001
Directors voted that the Cedar *Glen North -project, as outlined in your letter
dated January 24, 1977,would rot place an unreasonable burden on this munici-
pality to provide educational services.
'3ecause of our concern for the safety of our students, it is requested
that sidewalks be provided iji conjunction with the, roads to be constructed.
,rhis will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I ap) eaclosini,
a copy of our transi"Mrtation policy for your information. Plesse note; iteyn #4
under the administrative yuidelines - "inuses will not he routed over private
roads."
if you have any questions, please contact rhea.
Sincerely yours,
Frederick i'l. 'Tuttle
su� .1 , peri-tendent of Schools
Fill': cl
enc.
cc: Mr. Curtis W. Carter
/Mr. Stephen Page
mr. John il. Lucas
}
Mr. Fred Tuttle
Superintendent of schools
So. Burlington,Vermont
Dear Mr. Tuttle:
At our project, Cedar Glen :''or �
jested sales of twenty-five units
year.
Present plans call for f 5)
and twenty (20) two bed-- unit...
lie anticipate Gales o wenty-f
each of the two foll R year
pro-
, next
ree bedr
units for
The two bedroom units • 1 p _'ominate with
some three bedroom also - built.The ratio
should be 1n th bor_ of two to one.
Thank you ver ach the c urtesy shown us
In regards t this matt
Yo-�ts truly,
enry P.Potter
J
LAW OFFICES OF
EWING & SPOKES
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT OS401
JOHN T. EWING AREA CODE 802
RICHARD A. SPOKES July 26, 1976 863-2857
JOSEPH F. OBUCHOWSKI
Richard R. Ward
Zoning Administrator
1175 Williston Road
S. Burlington, Vt. 05401
RE: Cedar Glen Development - Potter
Dear Dick:
You have asked me for clarification of my letter of
July 16, 1976 pertaining to the Potter Development. It is
my understanding that Mr. Potter wishes to lower the age
limitation for occupants in the project. It is still my
opinion that there is no legal basis for the Planning
Commission to review the age question. I have, however,
reviewed the land use permit issued by the District Enviro-
nmental Commission, and it would appear that the granting of
the permit was on the basis that all occupants in the
development would be 52 years of age or older. Finding of
Fact No. 18 reads:
"The proposed development will be an adult community
and be restricted to occupants 52 years old or older.
No school age children will be allowed."
The District Environmental Commission also concluded
that the development will not cause an unreasonable burden
on the ability of the City to provide educational services.
it is my feeling that if Mr. Potter wishes to change
the age limitations, he will need approval from the District
Environmental Commission. I would recommend that the
appropriate authorities be contacted to determine whether
the schools can adequately accommodate the projected number
of new students resulting from a change in the age limitation.
If there is a problem, South Burlington should become a
party in the Environmental Commission proceedings.
If you have any further questions on this, please let
me know.
Very truly yours,
Ric-iar A. Spokes
RAS:nm
LAW OFFICES OF
EWING & SPOKES
B6 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
JOHN T. EWING
RICHARD A. SPOKES
JOSEPH F. OSUCHOWSKI
Richard R. Ward
Zoning Administrator
1175 Williston Road
S. Burlington, Vt. 05401
Dick:
AREA CODE 802
July 16, 1976 663-28S7
I am in receipt of your note of July 15, 1976 pertaining to
Mr. Potter. As I have said on many occasions, I do not believe
the City has any interest in the age limitations. No conditions
pertaining to age were included in the original Planning Commission
approval.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS:nm
21, 19,75
Mr. 11-enry Pottc.,r
11 Cedar Glen '*orth
South 11,urlington, VT 05401
Dear :'r. :'otter:
6ubJect: Zoninv buildin, for Phase 1 & 2 of
Tort, ,elopment
'--daz- '1--'len T, I, ;, ev
,
..s p,,?r your rqu.,st, this letter is to confirm the.t
Inc. issued permit -1*5535 on .Ubust 14, 1973 for the
construction of 92 dvelling units phase 1 and 2 o-T your
dovelowlent.
To date sixteen (16) units hav-_� been co1-)let,_,d in accord-
ance witla the plans on --i1e Wit-i th_is OL"fice.
V'er,,- truly ,
"= icharC ''ard
Zoning '-dministrative 01-f'ficer
RW/j
O4Nd 0 q4i �N� Per'aer/1/ �
6RjU4y Eq 4
W
P
C
r
MI LiN
CGT 6T S
r.5p e
. TFdS M
ppW 1
�ImS �5� <
f
`•uR, ua CGT e� OR;✓E T, 5f,;
dIEFD CGT SEe ,. •tT D" `
�T t6,6 I rcS.56
4r t. CGT t
'mL't p•.Y.j4_T �/z/r! E1 <r9jr T-P.Ye OO.v Cp+;[O
fj M rj '•or rz/2c/ •zip c<RS� <co B gFrrY e
loT
4.
S59_E4.
6
DID• K 4FTE; •t fro° --
�
! r rA, L.mm D „•
0, y
J� elp'k-lT /a
Jl lr LG rd.► .'
o
! r
O
40r j
\ C!! e
•a•g s+e t
w
O •m.
�f GT *r .cnt. cD1c
A
JLr ya k ce
� 4tno rye.
t iCV �s
e <
Z C corlsr
Q 44
e "t4s.rr'
r PODKT OF aCNwG
!46., a' Fa.-m•.-ij/ &RS. ✓O.HN NOWC aA'D
ALL BEARINGS ARE MAGNETIC AND ARE BASED
ON BEARING N i6' 27rI0•E TAKEN FROW LAUREL
DILL SOUTH PLANS BY ENGINEERS INC. of VT.
PROJECT Fitt. 602
ccm ,56
P.2
/e •.l.t T ►t
E�' E E2°LC'25'
� 25OOp•
CLUSTER °C' PARCEL
2.47± 4CRES
S
.E 920e 3O'y.
T S•,
T Oer
EEb4
iaf_%. ihla`:i ��.-il%a C• 'vi �. `' f �,� t;YSi__`� __..__.�C/ t4 .f! Lr.t///
I
%33.q.
T Y'.•EECG_K 4'�. �1�;: I~�,\ ^�_../ Cr: �;Gr'_,�r
f'
° C. sTq 3+ -Amama r'R l i P �Y �.'_ � - i ;- R G •- �•
ez•;1r_ �
0
RT. Si4� $ .
718,
0. -V 54- CUR IE DATA ` \ A
/ i_C c71 L Se9. 5fi i t26° 2T 21
-c5 s9 , 36a a_' • . 145 00' CFSTE-R R
T 287. 42 CTB z 4IC yEY
cuRrr ca-_ r 2s 8j23/EJ
L 3zC.O3'
+ PT rt E•30 C L. • 258.51' / % 'lilt cr•c �ma
T, 5924 4
C a 2s•27 t-i >< PC STA. 4-+61.40
i L't1
5 e. /
m n 4 57'
«• / •0'r �B Ast Jt.,
r4R/GN
[T STA. 2y9176
CURVE peTA /n I.
L . 3E.E8' .� O 4 r' •- �' /23CU�T/S
Lc
= 31.D6 �h ARC I47y3• /6y
RG. TA. i♦54.88 t : M83.22• J4a
^
446p'
STA. 17t25.00= �� CEDAR 6LFm 'r S Gym
50.44 A C r � S STe I Z7-35 , ARC 26e 50' DIVE 2'4j
T:i i3i?£i,i7 'If r
]39.27' 'O '~2D, 0y' 036 se E .4{..,� 23. s7
CURVE OAT - ACe'
.�
, ry 4.4, 4•� . ,t,
x C a R= T= 3C_E.O^.' •c 5 •O F J? aEm
pT SA. +h e.2]' O S• de
19,23-56 4 _ n' cc 01 .0 b0 J - 41C
h . •gyp w QF 2
d.
4 WNG is = a19. _-.' ^ p, "EO G• ,33A of se, Iron DI^
CUL De SAC b �y<�V! cst ap C' �f e0• h66m p
1 �
Ab '�' A,D, ro`B•' 4<q` ' 2'Or ZQy �r91,Tp+ q
-Sr M N°
T aA° 't
O BS 6 <ap C 4/
e
eC �G-
-14 ell
I'e, all rvc
.4 4,
14b'30..�c�i 43 AeTF /ej/6� FCC%rH Q
3.cz X q p c
cry
cY<^ r
h i/O B ej �GOR
- O
A..'
Ire r
All
P
A.
4
b
I
I crrtl/y tbot this It a
earrect JUIrrJ acccrJZ1
to br/vmction obtain•C
from Zorn nc.,A omr-4
e riefncr end fbmisheC
NOTE: TF:IS PLAN ADAPTED FROM PLAN ENTITLED
others.
BOUNDARY SURVEY PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE
CONVEYED TO ADCOM, INC. DATED JAN. 5, 1972
_
•atv ri
a•I m
'.00K TO R_ _ECT TRAI!==2 TO ACCOW, INC.
BOUNDARY IN=CPN": ON
PARCEL °C° CLUSTER B ACCESS
ADCOM INC.
CEDAR GLEN NCRTH
SPEAR SIKEEI
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
ENGINEERS INCORPr—qATED OF VERMONT
R0, BOX 2187
SOUTH BURL) GTON, VERMONT
OR>cn71C TRACED JXR DATA 5-5-I4
ARRROVEO X1YF SCL,E I' a toe
PRO,!.1�0 282!
State of V ;a 'I cm.
1
Dell'artment of Fish and Game
Department of Forests and Parks
Department of Water Resources
Environmental Board
Division of Environmental Protection
Division of Recreation
Division of Planning
Natural Resources Conservation Connell
Mr. Henry Potter
_1579 Spear St.
So. Burlincl'ton_,VT 05401
Dear Mc. Potter:
AGMICY 011 M4VIRONM1ENTAL CONSERVATION
MARTIN L. JOHNS0t1
Secretary k4oatpelier, Vermont 05602
D-E-Ti1 l MENT OF WATER RESOURCES
March 7, 1974
Re: _Cedar _Glen North
_ So. Burlington, VT
Pursuant to the Vennonh Health Regulations, Chapter. 5, Sani.tary Engineering, Subchapter
10, Part I, Subdivisions, a .revi..ew has been conducted of your subdivision application in
connection with the above .referenced project. Your al7p).ic:,l-ion was reviewed by
Raymond C. Rossi
Based upon this revi.e,a, Sl]1x vision Permit LC-- 1562-4 is hereby issued subject to the
lot descriptions, condi tio+l., and controls delineaeel in ,nr pl.i Cable portions of the permit.
The permittee is remi.nc?ccl that failure to comply lTi_t:h the conditions of the permit is
considered grounds for per_nu.t revocation as set forth in Section 814 of Title 3.- The
permittee is also remindecl that issuance of a State st+bdi.vi.si.^.n permit pursuant to State
law and regulations does not relieve said permittee .from campl.yi.ng with municipal/local
ordinances, regulations or by-laws as may be applicable.
Enclosed please find a copy of the permit and app.rov(>d sul)cli.Vision plat plan. Permit
and plan should be maintained by the permittee as a pormanont record of the permittee's
authority to proceed with subdivision.
Vtary truly ycmr..s,
Raymond C, Rossi
Engineer
DHW:RCR:ras Dcinald 41. DInhsher.
Di3 (.`Gt•or
Encl:Approved Plans and Subdivision Permit Division of 1'+fvironmental Protection
EC-1562-4
cc: ilaTanning Commission, Torn o['So. Burlington, VT 05401
Board of Selectmen, TccJn of So. Burlington, VT
District Environmentc0, COIMO Ssi On. # 4
Steve Sease, Land Use Administrator
Kenneth Pinkham, P.E., Engineers Inc, of Vermont, P.O. Box 2187, So. Burlington, VT
05401
);7'V.R0T,114r,,HTAL COI:'"EP,)ATION 703EMC.'.
PROTECTION DIVTSTQ)'l
SUBDIVISION PERMIT
(Issued under the provisic:,ne, of Charter 5, Subchapt�
10, of the Vermont Health 1?.equlations, as mnanded)
(1) PROPRIETOR (s):
Adcom, Inc.
(2) ADDRESS:
t'IO• EC-1562-4
t
c/o Mr. Henry Potter, 1579 Spear St., So. Burlington, ;VT. ',05401 �.
(3) NAME OF SUBDIVISTON:
CEDAR GLEN NORTH
(4) LOCATION OF SUBDIVISION:
Spear St., So. Burlington, VT.
(5) DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION:
A 50.44 acre parcel to be used for a 220 unit adult neighborhood
community as shown on the plot plan by Engineers Inc. of Vermont.
(6) PERMIT: Subject to any conditions hereinafter specified, the above named
Proprietor may suhdi.vide the tract of land dnpi.cted on the aforesaid plat
as proposed thereon.
(7) CONDITIONS: (SPP ATTACHED SHEET)
(8) REMARKS: Special note shcul.d be taken that Permit: does not exempt the
Permittee from the requ i..remr nts of the hater Quality Control Act of 1970
(10 V.S.A. , Charter 33) arrd the continuing jur:i.sdi.cti(:)n of the Department of
Water Resources, Agency of Environmw�nta1 Conservation, with respect to
abatement of water., pol.luLion :i.n the �,W:,rlt it m.aV occu.r..
This p31riit cl(7es noi. relievo Llt Pr-ot�rilc.nr(r,) from the requirement of
obtaining a Peimi.l: it-,nl t lfe I..rl.strir.t under the provisions
of 10 V.S.A., 151.
LATE: February�28,. 1974 _.._._... _._._ 11i?ritf`V CI1G 0FFTC'TNL
cc: Planning Commission, Town of So. Burlington, VT 05401.
Board of Selectmen, Town of So. Burlington, VT
District Environmental. Commission #4
Steve Sease, Land Use Administrator
Kenneth Pinkham, P.E., Engineers Inc. of Vermont, P.O. 2187, So. Burlington, VT
05401
CONDITIONS TO SUBDIVISION PERMIT 1C-1562-4
(1) Each living unit is approved for construction to the Bartlett's Bay Municipal
sewage disposal system, So. Burlington, VT,.as depicted on project No. 2683, as
approved by the Department of Water Resources.
(2) Each living unit is approved for connection to the Cedar Glen North Water Supply
System, whose source is the So. Burlington Public Water Supply System, approved
by the Department of Health.
(3) No living unit is approved for individual water supply or individual subsurface
wastewater disposal.
(3) Each prospective purchaser of any portion of the subdivision shall be shown a copy
of the approved plot plan, the engineer's site report and this permit before any
written contract of sale is entered into.
(4) No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from
the Division of Environmental Protection.
(5) This approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirement to comply with
municipal/local ordinances, regulations or by-laws governing the design, layout or
construction of this project.
(6) No public building, as defined in Title 18, Section 1301 of the Vermont Department
of Health Laws, shall be erected on any lot until complete plans covering sewage
disposal, water supply, interior plumbing, heating, ventilation and lighting have
been submitted to and approved by the Division of Environmental Protection.
(8) All construction shall be accomplished in strict accordance with the _plans approved
by the Department. of Water Resources and the Department of Health.
(5) The installation of the sewage disposal facilities shall be supervised by a
professional engineer and upon completion, certification shall be made inwriting
to the Division of Environmental Protection that the facilities have been installed
in.accordance with the approved plans.
(10) No occupancy of any unit shall take place until the wastewater disposal/water
supply systems serving the particular living unit have been constructed in their
entirety and have been certified by the Department of Water Resources/the Health
Department as being operational.
January 21, 1974
Horace B. Shaw, Jr., Exec. V President
Burlington Savings Bank
St. Paul and College Streets
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen :forth - Escrow Agreement
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear rir. Shaw:
An estimate of the work remaining to be completed at
the above referenced development is $12,496. Please release
all but this amount from the amount being held in escrow.
Very truly yours,
W.74 .
William J. Szymanski
City ?tanager
IIJS/h
cc: Mr. Henry P. Potter
P . S . , Ur. Potter:
1 t
I assume 'that the sewer and water lines in the development
have been tested and there are no leaks in the system. If we
find there are, we will withhold additional funds until the system
is acceptable.
WJS
-Pt
4 � 4
J.
Excavation
2.
Gravel
3:
Paving
4.-
Curbing
5..
-Seeding
6.1
Storms
7.
Water
8.
Sanitary
Open Ledg
Trench Le
100 ' 8"
.. i •
7
.. 3 , � 4YF l y vy
l
� R "..
yF�
w s
CEDAR GLEN
NORTHw
}.
COOLEY
CONTRACT
`
December 31, 1973
W/Extras
_Complete
Amount Remains
39,000.
!00
39,000. �r
23,253.
f'.. 98
22,788. 465..
26,263:..:
35
9,192. I7,071. `
11,315.
100
11,315.- r
:.
69,349:
98
67,962.. 1,387..`
71,457,
95,
,67,884 ; 3,573 y
23,321.
100
23,321,
263,958.
241 .462. 22,496.
100
560.
100:
1,620.
!r @8.
100
800.
t
244,442.
Decei-aber 10, 1973
Horace B. Shaw, Jr., Exec. V PresiCient
Burlington Savings Bank
St. Paul Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North - Escrow Agreement
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Mr. Shaw:
An estimate of .the work remaining to be completed at
the above referenced development is $34,561. Please release
all but this amount from the amount being held in escrow.
Very truly yours,
William .; . Szymanski
City Manager
WJS/h
November 9, 1973
Horace B. Shaw Jr., Executive V. President
Burlington Savings Bank
Corner College and St. Paul Streets
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North - Escrow Agreement
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Mr. Shaw:
As a result of a site inspection today, and on information
supplied by John Goodrich, I feel that the estimate of the
amount of the work completed to date on the above referenced
project is $170,000, leaving a balanceheld in escrow of
$80,000.
• Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
WJS/h
cc: Mr. Henry Potter
1579 Spear Street
South Burlington, Vt.05401
E
November 1, 1973
Horace B. Shaw Jr., Executive V.President
Burlington Savings Bank
Corner College and St. Paul Streets
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North -Escrow Agreement
South Burlington,, Vermont
Dear Mr. Shaw.
An estimate of the work completed to date on the above
referenced project=,is $75,000.
This amount can be released to the developer leaving a
balance of $175,000 in escrow.
Sincerely yours,
William J. Szymanski
City i,,anager
WJS/h
r
LAW OFFICES OF
EWING & SPOKES
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401
July 11, 1973
James M. Farrell, Esq.
McNamara, Fitzpatrick, Sylvester,
Farrell & Maley
192 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
RE: Potter Development
Dear Jim:
In order that there be no confusion, I thought it
appropriate to outline the steps your client should under-
take prior to the issuance of any building permits:
1. The park land or open space area comprising approxi-
mately 7-1/2 acres is to be deeded to the City.
2. An escrow agreement must be executed between the City
Qand your client pertaining to the construction of the roads,
or in lieu of an escrow agreement, bonds :rust be posted. We
have used an escrow agreement in the past, and I will furnish
you a copy for your examination.
3. The final landscaping plan must be presented to the
Planning Commission for approval.
4. Detailed plans of the roads and utilities must be
presented to and approved by the city manager.
5. A deed to the road must be presented to the City.
In conferring with you, I understand that you and your
clients may have some questions concerning the park land and
RLCtjvEt0
110ANAG14'q 0P'FIJf
James M. Farrell, Fs
q-
Page Two July 11, 1973
the road to be conveyed to the with Cit 'Mr. Potter confer directly y' I wouli suggest that
confusion. 'Sr.
Another possibility Szymanski to iron out any
might be for
Mr. Szymanski, "^s. Ward and me to meet. you, t�ir• Potter,
these items should be ironed out to avoidlanyndelaystin theePl
issuance of the requisite permits to your client.
RAS/n
cc: William J. Szymanski
Very .truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
BL RLINGTON SAVINGS BANK
INCORPORATED 1 847
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
HORACE B. SHAW, JR,
ESECOM VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
May 23, 1973
Mr. William J. Szymanski
City Manager
City of South Burlington
1175 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Phase I & II, Potter Development
Off Spear Street
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Mr. Szymanski:
Replying to your letter of May 14th regarding the above
development, this is to advise that when the loan
transaction is completed on June 5th, Burlington Savings
Bank will escrow the sum of $250,000 from the proceeds
of the loan to assure completion of the roads and services
which the City of South Burlington will require. No
payments will be made from this sum except upon consent
of the City.of South Burlington.
HBS:msb
cc: Mr. James Farrell
Very truly yours,
H. B. Shaw, Jr.
R E C E I V E 0
MAY 2 4 19ts
MANAGER'S OFFICE
C17Y SO. BURLINGTON
May 14, 1973
tAx. Horace B. Shaw, Jr.
Executive Vice -President
Burlington Savings Bank
St. Paul and College Streets
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Phase I & II, Potter Development
off Spear Street
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Mr. Shaw:
The estimated amount of the bond,for construction
of roads and services to the above referenced project
which the City will require to assure completion;, will
be approximately $250,000.
Very truly yours,
v,illiam J. Szymanski
City Manager
WJS/h
May 1, 19 7 3
Mr. Curtis Carter
Conunission District 14
Essex Junction, V'2 05401
Re; Cedar Gleii North - ONOCOM
bear 114'r. Cartor;
'Ohe. TOrivaLE- drive indicated on driams
submitted by Etjinet;r-:. lncor,,:,orateG in tre 250 applica-
tion iieets our city standards for construction with the
exception Lhat the 5" gravel shou16 be incrcased to 12
in adLlition t(.-, tlte 4`' of cruslaer-run aravel anu' a 61'
cusIlion of sand where require(I. This Section shall
include 3 foot shoulders along eacn side of the roadway.
Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager
WJS1h
CC. Mr. 1. Pink-,`iam
Ln4inee�rs Inc.
SO.Burlington, Vt.
s
1 FILE NO. 04-14-005
q1�����
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
DISCHAR E PERMIT N° 3— 0 1 5 9
NAME OF PERMITTEE: Adcom Inc.
1579 Spear St.
Address j S . Burlington,
Vermont
Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter specified, the above
named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge waste into the
waters of the state pursuant to 10 V.S.A. �911a.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Location of Discharge:
City of South Burlington, East of Twin Orchards Development.
2. Receiving Waters:
Minor tributaries of Potash Brook, designated Class B water
and further designated as pristine stream.
3. Manner of Discharge:
Discharge pipes into stream
4. Wastes Permitted:
Storm water only after treatment in catch basins designed
to remove settleable and floating material.
5. Volumes Permitted:
Such volumes as required to dispose of normal storm drainage.
6. Frequency of )scharge.
Daily
7. 0 eration and Treatment Requirements:
All s orm wa er s a e treatedy passage through catch
basins designed with. submerged inlet. And outlet pipes
to remove settleable solids and all floatable material.
$, Maintenance Requirements:
None
9. Personnel and Training Requirements:
None
10. Monitoring, and Reportin.,; Requirements:
None
11. rnscellaneous Requirements:
None
July 1, 1975
12. Expiration Date: Note: This permit, unles-,
revoked, shall be valid until the designated expiration date despite any
intervening change in water quality, effluent or treatment standards or
the classification of the receiving; waters. However, any such changed standard
or classification small be applied in determining whether or not to renew
the permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. s91la(e).
13. Revocation: 10 V.S.A. $913a provides as follows:
"The department may revoke any permit issued by it pursuant
to this subcb apter if it finds that the permit holder
submitted false or inaccurate information in his application
or has violated any requirement, restriction or condition
of the permit issued. Revocation shall be effective upon
actual notice thereof to the permit holder."
14. Transfer of Permit: This permit shall not be transferred without
the prior written approval of the Vermont Department of Water Resources.
15. Date of Permit: April 19 , 1973
VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
By
Commissioner
DIVISION OF
:Anthony Robbins, M.D., M.P '\
COMMISSIONER J
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
STATE OF VERMONT
AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
115 COLCHESTER AVENUE
BURLINGTON 05401
April 19, 1973
Engineers Inc. of Vermont
P.O. Box 2187 Co"A.Iliston Road)
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attn: Mr. Kenneth W. Pinkham, P.E.
Subject: Cedar Glen North, South Burlington
Gentlemen:
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
We have reviewed the preliminary layout for the proposed facilities
submitted by your firm. Approval of the concept of serving the develop-
ment with public water supply facilities connected to the South Burlington
water system is given.
The general layout of proposed facilities appears adequate. However,
several areas of conflict between water supply and sewerage facilities,
both storm and sanitary, were noted and discussed with you. These conflicts
must be eliminated or minimized during final design. Final approval can
only be given after review of construction plans prepared by a Professional
Engineer.
All water supply facilities must be designed and constructed in accord-
ance with "Ten State Standards' which have been adopted as part of health
Department Regulations. Water main -sewer crossings and conflicts must be
given particular attention as outlined in the standards. Also as indicated
in the standards we will expect the engineer to provide adequate on -site inspection
during construction to ensure that the facilities are constructed in accordance
with the plans and "Ten State Standards".
Please contact us if we may be of further assistance.
Ve trueamson"
rs
ert R, P.E.
Sanitary Engineer
Division of Environmental Health
RRLJsjm
cc: Mr. Francis L. Rooker, Water Sanitarian
State of Vermont
Department of Fish and Game
Department of Forests and Parks
Department of Water Resources
Environmental Board
Division of Environmental Protection
Division of Recreation
Division of Planning
Natural Resources Conservation Council
Mr. Kenneth Pinkham, P. E.
Engineers Incorporated of Vermont
R.F.D. #2 - Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Mr. Pinkham:
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
MARTIN • • i'�M/ )M.I.MV�IN-',�N�H HVI �./!.."MM� •_ l
Secretary
Montpelier,Vermont
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
April 19, 1973
RE: Adcom, Inc.
South Burlington
This office has reviewed the plans for a storm water collection system
which discharges to an unnamed stream in the vicinity of the proposed
development. Please be advised that these documents have been found
acceptable and have been forwarded to the Permit Section of the Department
of Water Resources with the recommendation that a Discharge Permit be
issued.
This office has also reviewed conceptual plans for a gravity sewer
collection system discharging to the existing South Burlington sewer
collection system. Please be advised that we find these plans
conceptually acceptable; however, this office will reserve the right to
review final detailed plans and specifications prior to approval under
10 V.S.A. 916. '
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Z v �Gl�u V" C12z
William C. Brierle , P. E.
Sanitary Engineer
WCB/ lc
• CONSULTANT
' ENGINEERS
• SURVEYORS
ENGINEERS INCORPORATED OF VEPRMONT OCONSTRUCTION
INSPECTION
P,O. 2187 SOUTH 8URLINGTON, V E R M 0 N T 05401 AREA CODE 802 863-6389
April 23, 1973
District Environmental Commission No. 4
58 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
South Burlington Planning Commission
City Hall
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
City of South Burlington
City Hall
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission
58 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Agency of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Protection
Montpelier, Vermont 05602
Re: Adcom, Inc., Cedar Glen North
Application No. 4C 0103
To All Parties:
Enclosed are letters of comment from the Vermont Health
Department and Department of Water_ Resources regarding the
preliminary plan submittals associated with the above des-
cribed project.
V y truly your,
kwp/np Kenneth W. Pinkham, P.E.
Project Engineer
cc: Mr. Henry Potter
Mr. Terrence Boyle
RECEIVED
encls; as
APR 2 61973
MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY SO. BURLINGTON
March 12, 1973
Mr. Brian Lloyi, coordinator
District Lnvironnental Commission No. 4
Chittenden County hugioaal Planning comaissiol
56 Pearl street
Essex JuOction, Vernont 05452
Re; Cedar Glen Uorth
Dear Mr. Lloyd:
The proposed 220 unit adult neighborhood community
planned for construction off Near Street in South Burlington
is intended to be connected to the City sewer system. The
develOXWt will Pro6une am estimated 44,000 gpd of sewage.
Portions of the new community will be sewered to the
Shelburne Road interceptor via Laurel Aill Drive and Imperial
Drive sewers. The developer has agreed to rebuild a portioli
Of the Imperial Drive sewer, which is presently at or near
its maximum carrying capacity.
The treataork plant to which this area is tributary is
as secondary facility capable of haLdliag 70U,000 gpd. Present
flows average about 400,000 gpd.
The additional qua"tity of sewage expected can, with the
improvements mentio"e, above, adequately be handled by the
existing City sewer system with no undue hardship.
wis1h
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski
City Manager and zngineer
CC: Mr. Henry Potter
Mr. Terrance Boyle
Engineers incorporated of veryont
February 20, 1973
_ �3'r;;+' �' •�"yam
A ;t, Pau
t:>> rY 1 ton, 1/T
7J1Fr�
_ n u • �.' j o
CS: 01 _x_ �
C'U's7,4
yc b.
n
arc . ? .
13
'I1
o"1S I"3 c T'di 1g 1�,t1i.S ]ttcr 9
1
feel `free
If J CiLl V� 2il�j
ridc3t!
to re •
ti ---y ';'C'ul-
Zoning Ad--inistrativ
r-.l j
OFFICE OF TERRENCE J. BOYLE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND SITE PLANNING CONSULTANTS 86 ST. PAUL STREET, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 658-3555
TERRENCE J. BOYLE
January 10, 1973
RONALD W. SLAYTON
Mr. Douglas Tudhope, Acting Chairman
South Burlington Planning Commission
1175 Williston Road
South Burlington, VT 05401
Re: Potter Development
Dear Commissioners:
In behalf of our client, Mr. Henry Potter, we ask you to consider
the following items in recommending to the Council,who will bear
the cost to rebuild the sewer lines on Shelburne Road to allow
proper flowage from Laurel Hill and the proposed development of
the Potter Project.
In accordance with the recommendations made by Paulsen Associates,
Inc. and subsequent studies by Engineers Inc. about 380' of 8"
pipe, 64' of pipe sleeve and 3 manholes are needed. The estimated
cost of this project, including engineering is $15,160.00.
We recommend that the City undertake this project for the following
reasons:
1. The sewer line when built was improperly graded so
as to create a condition under which full capacity
cannot be obtained. The Paulsen report also indi-
cates that substantial amounts of sewer flow is
from sump pumps in Laurel Hills, such flow being a
result of inadequate storm drainage.
2. Since the town had accepted this construction at a
past date, they are now responsible for the proper
maintenance and repair (including rebuilding) of
this line. Unconfirmed reports indicate that there
have been times in the past when these sections of
sewer line have functioned improperly.
3. Since Mr. Potter is developing his land in accordance
with the zoning and subdivision regulations adopted
by the City of South Burlington, and in fact would
not be overburdening the sewer line if it were prop-
erly constructed, it is the City's responsibility
to rebuild this line.
IN COLLABORATION WITH RESEARCH PLANNING AND DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. COOK PLACE, AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS 01003
South Burlington Planning Commission
Re: Potter Development
January 10, 1973
Page 2
4. Oversights in providing adequate storm drainage
in past developments has also become a burden
for our client, necessitating lifting of storm
water at considerable expense and diverting it
to provide relief from an existing condition.
5. By providing a park on the property line of
Laurel Hill south we are already rectifying a
past planning error and should not be unduly
burdened with correcting other planning or
construction errors not of Mr. Potter's making.
6. This project will greatly benefit South Burling-
ton land use and tax base (no school children,
privately maintained drives, etc.).
7. This project has been stalled for approximately
one year with a considerable loss in taxes to
South Burlington. Time consumption has escalated
the cost of the project which will be born event-
ually by the residents of the development.
We respectfully request that the Planning Commission take the
above matters into consideration in making a just and equitable
recommendation to the Council in this matter.
Sincerely ours,
Y'c
TerJ. BTJB
ell:
-?0000
300
December 1, 1972
Mr. Henry Potter
1855 Spear Street
South Burlington, Vt. 05401
Dear !sir. Potter:
Enclosed is a copy of the report of the investigation
of the capacity of the sewer lines serving Laurel Hill North
and Laurel Hill South.
The report was prepared by Paulsen and Associates of
South Burlington and a copy %,;as obtained by Charles Diggle of
hick.ock and Boardman several weeks ago.
In summary the report points out that the most critical
section is the 62' for 8 inch sewer parallel to Shelburne Road
which has a spare capacity of 198-164 = 14 gallons per minute
for 68% pipe capacity. With each unit expected to generate
1.04 gallons per minute this sewer could accumulate 14 = 1.04 =
13 units.
The next critical section is on Imperial Drive between
ME 1 and MH 2 which has a capacity for 75 additional units. If
a new sewer line were constructed as shown on the sketch, the
capacity in the area could be increased by 460 G.P.M. The
critical length would then be on Andrews Avenue between ME 6 and
7 which has a capacity of appooximately 295 - 61 m 234 G.P.M.
or 234 ; 1.04 - 225 units.
The sewer serving Laurel Hill North has an additional capa-
city of 63 units which is conservative because the assumption is
made that the same flow passes through this line as was gauged
at the end of the system.
If there are additional questions please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
William J. Szymanski, City Manager
NJ S/h
Enclosures
r,
CONSULTING C�: ,INFERS
PAULSEN /.SSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
A0 [ARR[ll STRE ET 0 SOUTH BURLINGTON, V[ RMONT 05401 0 TEL (802) 864 0126
October 1$ , 1972
City of South Burlington
1181 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attention:
Re.
Gentlemen:
Mr. Will-iam J. Sz
P. A. Job No. 7223
nski, City Manager
In accordance with your letter dated 13 September 1972
requesting a study of two sewers in the Shelburne Road area,
we now present our report and drawings showing the results of
our studies.
To determine the present flows and fucure capacities
of the existing lines discharging to the Imperial Drive and
1,aurel Drive sewers, the following gagings and surveys
were made.
IMPERIAL Dlt-WE SEI.TER
On the morning of Tuesday, 26 September 1972 at 11:30
an electronic recording device, manufactured by NI3 Pro-
ducts, Inc., was installed in manhole nui,iber 2 on Imperial
Drive (Sec attached sketch plan forlocation). The record, r
rcM"iined in t:-;c sewer until 10:10 :,.m. the following ':o:;c'a�',
2 Octobl r .';72, during which time a constant recordin` of t::e
depth of :Io t-hrough the manhole invert was T:,ade.
October 11, 14'972
City of South Burlington
Page 2
The weather during this period was predominently dry
although heavy rain did occur on Friday, 29 September during
the evening hours. A sudden increase in the recorded depth
at about 8:30 p.m, could represent some water entering the
sewers from illegal roof or other connections. 'Throughout
the complete period of gaging)the maximum reading which oc-
curred fairly regularly in the morning and evening,did not
exceed 43% of the scale on the recording tape. .'hen corrected
from the conversion curve supplied with the instrument, the
flow in the pipe indicates a maximum depth of 30% of the pipe
diameter.
During the period when the instrument was recordi.ng,a
survey was made of the road profile and the manholes were
opened to measure the depth to each invert. The fall between
manholes was thus determined together with the gradient for
each length of sewer. From the gradient of the length of
sewer immediately upstream of manhole 2, the recording poiu ,
a slope of 1 foot fall in 18.2 feet was measured. With this
gradient a theoretical velocity of 11 feet per second would
result with the pipe flowing full or half full. However, with
only 30% of the pipe carrying flow, which was the maximum
depth recorded, the proportional velocity reduces to 0.17 of
the theoretical half full or full velocity,which is 8.36 feet
per second. The theoretical proportional discharge at the.
same depth of flow is 0.19 of a pipe flowing full. An 8 inch
pipe flowing full with this gradient will discharge approxi-
mately 180 cubic feet per minute or 1,350 gallons per minute,
assuming a friction factor of 0.013 in the Manning formula.
The theoretical proportional discharge at the maximum recorded
flow was, therefore, 180 x .19 cubic feet per minute NAiich
equals 34.2 cubic feet per minute or 256 gallons per minute..
i
October 11, 19, /--
City of South Burlington
Page 3
However, the foregoing theoretical values are based on pipes
laid at a very constant grade and with good even joints. The
sewers in question were not constructed in this fashion, there-
fore it was decided that the velocity should be measured over
the full length of the upstream sewer. In the sewer length
from manhole 2 to 3 the actual velocity at 30% depth of flow -,
was measured at 6 feet per second or 72% of the theoretical
velocity. The actual flow passing through the manhole at the
measured velocity therefore equals 72% of 256 or 184 gallons
per minute.
TABULATION OF ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF SEWER LENGTHS
TRIBUTARY TO IMPERIAL DRIVE
Estimated Estimated
Sewer Capacity Capacity 68%
Location Length Gradient Pipe Full Pipe Depth Remarks
This lengtFF
Imp. Dr. MH 1-MH 2 0.49%. 328 GPM 262 GPM allows for
138 new units
with pipe ful
or 75 with
68% of pipe
depth
to
MH
2-MH
3
5.5%
1180
GPM
945
GPM
Is
MI1
3-MH
4
3.13%
936
GPM
758
GPM
Worth
St. MH
4-MH
5
1.39%
552
GPM
442
GPM
And.
Ave MH
5-Mil
6
0.362%
288
GPM
230
GPM
These lengt'
although of
It
MH
6-MEi
7
0.61%
368
GPM
295
GPM
smaller cap
if
Mii
7-MH
8
1.10%
496
GPM
397
GPM
acity than
MH 1-2 corn-
"
MH
8-MH
9
1.178%
512
GPM
410
GPM
bine to
provide.
.451
GPM cap.
Irnp.
Dr. M11
4-MH
10
0.345%
276
GPM
221
GPM
Gr.
Dol. MH
10-MH
11
1.725%
612
GPM
490
GPM
MH
11-MH
6
0.666%
384
GPM
304
GPM
-',
Estimated
full
capacity
based
on 80% of
theoretical
capacity,
to allow for condition
of sewer.
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 4
From the above tabulation it can be seen that the
sewer length with the smallest carrying capacity is the length
from manhole 1 to 2. The estimated full pipe maximum capacity
for.this length is 328 gallons per minute. If the maximum
recorded flow of 184 gallons per minute is deducted 'from this
flow a spare capacity of 144 gallons per minute remains..
Assuming each unit of the proposed new development is
to house 3 persons and each person returns 100 gallons of
sewage daily to the sewer (infiltration vincluded) the daily
flow will equal 300 gallons per unit. Allowing a peak rate
of 5 times average flow, this would be equal to a maximum
hourly rate of 1,500 gallons per day, per unit, or 1.04
gallons per minute.. Spare capacity in this length of sewer
will therefore be equal to 144 or 138 units, if the pipe is
flowing full. With 68% of the sewer permitted as the maximum
depth of flow the spare capacity in the sewer will reduce to
262 - 184 = 78 gallons per minute and the number of new units
which can then be co mected will be equal to 8 1 or 75 units.
LAUREL DRIVE SEWER
The gaging in the Laurel Drive sewer was carried out
in the same fashion and with the same equipment used in the
Imperial Drive gaging. The equipment was installed in manhole
number 2 (See attached sker_ch plan) on Monday, 2'October 1972
at 12:30 p.m. and gaging was continued ur)til 8:40 a.m. the
following Monday, 9 October 1912. The weather was again pre-
dominantly dry except for Saturday when fairly heavy rain
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 5
continued throughout the day and during the evening. No
obvious increase in flow occurred and it can be assumed that
no illegal connections are affecting the flow in these sewer
lengths. The maximum depth recorded on the flow recorder
tape during the whole period was 52% of scale reading for a
period of approximately 30 minutes on Thursday morning be-
tween 7 and 8 a.m. When corrected for the instrum_ent,using
the curve provided, the depth of flow indicates a maximum of
39% of the pipe diameter. From the gradient of the length
of sewer immediately upstream of manhole 2, the gaging point,
a slope of 1 foot fall in 82 feet was measured. With this
gradient a theoretical velocity of 4.15 feet per second would
-result with the pipe flowing full or half full. However, with
39% of the pipe depth carrying flow, the maximum recorded
theoretical proportional velocity reduces to 3.7 feet per
second and the theoretical proportional discharge to 0.32 of
a pipe flowing full. An 8 inch pipe.flowing full at the
above gradient will discharge approximately 86.9 cubic feet
minute which is equal to 650 gallons per minute. The theo-
retical proportional discharge at the maximum recorded flow
was therefore 650 x 0.32 or 208 gallons per minute.
The theoretical values are again based on pipes laid
true to grade, and with good even joints. These sewers, like
those in Imperial Drive, do not have velocities equal to the
theoretical velocities. The actual velocity recorded with
flows at.less than half pipe depths was measured at 2.1 feet
per second or 57% of the theoretical velocity. The actual
maximum flow measured through the gaging manhole was therefore
57% of 208 or 119 gallons per minute.
1
October 11, 1972-
City of South Burlington
Page 6
TABULATION OF ESTIMATED CAPACITY OF SEWER LENGTHS
TRIBUTARY TO LAUREL DRIVE
Location
Sewer
Length
Gradient
Estimated
Capacity
Pipe Full
Estimated
Capacity 68%
Pipe Depth
Remarks
Laurel Dr.
MH
1-MH
2
0.847%
432
GPM
355
GPM
if
MH
2-MH
3
1.22%
520
GPM
41.6
GPM
If
MH
3-MH
4
1.265%
532
GPM
425
GPM
"
MH
4-MH
5
1.41%
552
GPM
452
GPM
"
MH
5-MH
6
0.435%
312
GPM
250
GPM
"
MH
6-MH
7
0.313%
264
GPM
211
GPM —
This
length
allows for
109
new unit
with
pipe
full
or 63
with
68% of
pipe
depth
"
MH
7-MH
8
0.238%
232
GPM
185
GPM
Cranwell
Ave. MH
8-MH 9
1.495%
560
GPM
448
GPM
it MH
941H 10
0.502%
332
GPM
266
GPM
it MH
10-MH 11
0.637%
372
GPM
298
GPM
" MH
11-MH 12
0.426%
i 308
GPM
246
GPM
Estimated full capacity based on 80% of theoretical capacity
to allow for condition of sewer.
From the above table it can be seen that the sewer with
the smallest carrying capacity is the length between manholes
7 and 8. The estimated full pipe maximum capacity for the
length is 232 gallons per minute. This length of sewer is,
however, a considerable distance up the line from the gaging
point and therefore it would not carry the maximum flow measured.
However, assurning this flow did occur at this point, the pipe
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 7
would still have additional capacity for 232 - 11-9 or 113
gallons per minute. With a maximum hourly rate of 1.04
gallons per minute from each of the proposed new housing
units the spare capacity would provide for 1�T+ or 109 units.
Likewise, if the maximum depth is limited to 68% of the full
depth the spare capacity will equal 185 - 119 or 66 gallons
per minute which is equal to I or 63 housing units.
SUMMARY
To summarize the above data, we estimate that the
Imperial Drive and Laurel Drive sewers can handle the follow-
ing additional housing units without any major changes except
perhaps the shelves should be raised to contain the flow within
the pipe channel.
IMPERIAL DRIVE
138 housing units if sewer length
MH 1 - MH 2 is allowed to run full.
75 housing units if flow is restricted
to 68% of pipe depth.
LAUREL DRIVE 1.09 housing units if sewer length
MH 7 - MH 8 is allowed to run full.
63 housing units if flow is restricted
to 68% of pipe depth..
We calculate from the low flows recorded during the night
that the infiltration rates into the sewers are as follows:
IMPERIAL DRIVE
Infiltration
Peak SeN-.age Flow
Total Flow
76 GPM = 41%
108 GPM -- 597.
184 GPM
Peak hourly water demand at 5 x
average rate based on last 3 month
period with 80% returned to sewer ==105 GPM
October 11, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 8
LAUREL DRIVE Infiltration
Peak Sewage Flow
Total Flow
22.5 GPM = 19%
96.5 GPM = 81%
119.0 GPM
Peak,hourly water demand at 5 x
average rate based on last 3 month
period with 80% returned to sewer = 98 GPM
All of the above information is based on -the information
currently available. No estimate can be made regarding the
infiltration which may occur in these 'sewers during the .spring
thaw when the water table is usually considerably higher.
e
Very truly yours,
PAULSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
r � �
Arthur W. Parkes
AWP/meo
Encl. - Two drawings showing profiles of sewers.
No Text
1972
Tyr. Terrance Foyle
86 St. Paul Street
Burlington, VT 05401
Dear 1,1r. Poyle:
Subject: Potter Sub -division
This letter is to serve as notice that the South Burlington
Plannin Commission approved the proposal of M7-. Henry Pctter
for the Yandow property at the meeting of July 11, 1-972.
Approval was granted for the development with the following
modifications:
1. that a field study be made o.r eyistin.,,- sewaf,-,,(,,
system to determine if it will accommodate all
proposed development;
2, that the storm drainage system conform to state
standards and be acceptable to the City Engineer:
and
3. that the development be so plane-,,,l that access
be entirely from Spear Street.
The developer may present a modified application in accordance
with Article 3, Section 302 of the City Subdivision Regulations.
Very truly,
Richard Ward
Zoning Administrator
SUBDIVISION NOTICE
SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COM1M41;SION
The South Burlington Planning Commission cold a
public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, L erence
Roofn, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on
Tuesday, June 13, 1972 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the
following: `
The appeal of Henry Potter of New Jersey for approval
of a sub -division of a parcel of land, containing approxi-
mately 50.44 acres into twenty (20) conventional parcels,
plus future planned residential development. Parcel in 1
question is presently the Yandow property lying westerly of
Spear Street and abutting the property of Urban and f
Charlotte Wheelock on the north and Mrs. John Nolan on t
f the south, as per plan on file at the office of the Zoning l
Administrator. James A. Lamphere, Vice Chairman t
027172 South Burlington Planning Commission
LEGAL NOTICE
�• ^•�-
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
SUBDIVISION NOTICE
Pursuant coon413, the
provisions Bsof 24 ington City
Section 4ad3, the South Burlington City
►- BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
Council will hold a public hearing at the
vv.
City Offices, Conference Room, 1175
Williston . koad, South Burlington,
Vermont, on Monday, March 5, 1973 at
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public
7:3i' -p.m. to consider the application
hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room
for a zoning permit from Henry Potter,
of South Burlington, Vermont for
1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday
construction of 92 condominium units
January 30, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following
on a parcel of land located westerly of
_
Spear Street, abutting property of
The appeal of Henry Potter of South Burlington,
Wheelock and Newland.
Also the application of Donald Brisson
Vermont for approval of. a subdivision of a parcel
and Archie Myers of South Burlington,
of land containing approximately 50.44 acres into
Vermont for conversion of an existing
two hundred and forty (240) cluster design parcels
building into a dual use, automobile
and marina dealership, on a parcel of
for purposes of condominium development. Parcel -".'�•
land located at the intersection of
in question is presently the Yondow,-property lying -
Shelburne Road and Allen Road.
westerly of Spear Street and abutting the property
Also the application of Robert Cutler f
Urban and Charlotte Wheelock on the north and.
Gastown, Inc., Springfield, Mass. forof
construction of a gasoline station on a
Mrs. John Nolan on the south, as per plan on fsle'
parcel of land located at the
at the office of the Zoning Administrator.
intersection of Williston Road and
Patchen Road.
Also the application of Attorney
Douglas 1. Tudhope�
Richard Thomas of Burlington,
Vice Chairman -
Vermont, an agent for King Burger for
reconstruction of the present Lure
South Burlington Planning COmmISSIOr
Jan. 15, 1973 9 9
property into another restaurant, on a
j ---- ---------- --
parcel of land located at 1200 Williston
Road.
Plans for the above applications are on
file in the office of the Zoning
Administrative Officer.
Richard Ward
Zoning Administrative Officer
City of South Burlington, Vt.
�Feb.17,l9p_, ,
I
(Form for newspaper notice and town clerk)
VERMONT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
Land Use Permit Application
Pursuant to 10 VSA Section 6084, notice is hereby made of an application
for a permit for a Development or Subdivision to the District Environmental
Commission.
Name and address of applicant ADCOM INC
1579 Spear Street
South Burlington, VT 05401
Location and nature of the proposed project (if subdivision, the number of
lots) 50.44 acres 220 condominium units, adult community
between Spear Street and Laurel Hill
Location of District Environmental Commission where application filed
Essex Junction, Vermont
\ Date of filing March 12, 1973
Under 10 VSA Chapter 151, Adjoining Property Owners to the proposed Devel-
opment or Subdivision have 15 days from publication of this notice to request
a hearing on the application with the District Environmental Commission involved.
121J,
t � State of V(3"InoIA t
J p1C
Department of Fish and Game
Department of Forests and Parks
Department of Water Resources
(Environmental Board
Division of Environmental Protection
Division of Recreation
Division of Planning
Natural Resources Conservation Council
_Mr. Henry Potter
1579 Spear St.----•----._.�..._._..__
So. Burlington, VT 05401
Dear. Mr. Potter:
Ar,E11C Y sal" FNVIIZONMENTAL CONSERVATION
MARTIH L. JOI-INSOt!
Sec,etary Montpelier, Vermont 05602
DETAR7'MENT OF WATER RESOURCES
March 7, 1974
MAR 2 0 1974
!
CITY SO, pU€t)..►Mc�.L.
Rr : Cedar Glen North
.So. Burlington, VT
Pursuant to the Venront: Health Regulations, Chapter 5, S;)vJ.tnry Epgineering, Subchapter.
10, Part 1, Subdivisions, n reviovr has been conduct-nd of your subdivision application in
connection with the above referenced project, Your was reviewed by
Raymond C. Rossi
Based upon this revie,a, Subdi-vision Permit EC- 1562-4 Is hereby issued subject to the
lot descriptions, conditions and controls delineated in al;:%>licahle portions of the permit.
The permittee is reminded that. failure to comply iriAh the couditions of the permit is
considered grounds for permit r_nvocation as set forth in :section 814 of Title 3. The
permittee is also reminded that issuance of a State subdivision permit pursuant to State
law and regulations does not relieve said permittee from complying with municipal/local
ordinances, regulations or by-laws as may be applicable.
Enclosed please find a cope of the permit and npp.rovcd sub(7.iv.ision plat plan. Permit
and plan should be maintained by the permittee as a phr.-ma►inrit: record of the permittee's
authority to proceed with subdivision.
Very truly yours,
&' L —C, `1Z-a-I&L
Raymon C. Rossi
Engineer
DI%TW:RCR:ras Donald IV% Ytrhster
1A r.c,ct-or
Encl: Approved Plans and Subdivision Permit Pi•., i.slon or Environmental Protection
EC-1562-4
cc: Planning Commission, Torn a" So. Burlington, VT 05401
ward of Selectmen, TOW" Of: So. Burlington, VT
District Environtrtent ,.O. Cotrurt:ission If 4
Steve Sease, La)d Use Administrator
Kenneth Pinkham, P.E., Engineers Inc. of Vermont, P.O. Box 21_87, So. Burlington, VT
05401
,TV:Cmt.0NME14TAL C01!';EPV71'rION T,GF 1r(
PP.OTEC`.rION DIVIS10119
SUBDIVISION PERMIT
(Issued under the provisions of Chapter 5, Sr.xhch,3ptnr
10, of the Vermont. IIeal.th Regulations, ns vn:ndecl)
(1) PROPRIETOR (s):
Adcom, Inc.
(2) ADDRESS:
140. FC-1562-4
c/o Mr. Henry Potter, 1579 Spear St., So, Burlington, VT 05401
(3) NAM:: OF SUBDIVISTON -
CEDAR GLEN NORTH
(4) LOCATION OF SUBDIVISION:
Spear St., So. Burlington, VT.
(5) DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION:
A 50.44 acre parcel to be used for a 220 unit adult neighborhood
community as shown on the plot plan by Engineers Inc, of Vermont.
(6) PERMIT: Subject to any conditions hereinafter sVecified, the above named
Proprietor may suhdi.vide the tract of land depicted on the aforesaid plat
as proposed thereon),
(7) CONDITIONS: (SPI-1 ATTACHED SHEET)
(8) REMARKS: Special. uotn should be taken that this rormi.t does not exempt the
Permittee from the regc17.remr2nts of the vlater Quality Control Act of 1970
(10 V.S.A. , Chapter 33) azrd the continuing juris3ict:i.: 11 of the Department of
Water Resources, Agency of Environmental Conservation, -,,rith respect to
abatement of. -,-rater .po1.1-1fl-Jon i.n the evr:nt: it may o^rilr,
R
This 'I)1'1:',,dA: clr. c'r! not-. r:el:ievo t11C1 :From the requirement of
obtaining a Pei mi I' [rcnll Lrle District E'twi. romp ili:;rm r'l„wmi.ssion under the provisiona
of 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151.
PATE: February_28 ; 1974 A v r..w',v N , OFr Tl' 7T,r,
cc: Planning Commission, Town of So. Burlington, VT 05401
Board.of Selectmen, Town of So, Burlington., VT
District Environmental Commission #4
Steve Sease, Land Use Administrator_
Kenneth Pinkham, P,E., Engineers Inc, of Vermont, P.O. 2187, So. Burlington, VT'
05401
CONDITIONS TO SUBDIVISION PERMIT lC-1562-4
(1) Each living unit is approved for construction to the Bartlett's Bay Municipal
sewage disposal system, So. Burlington, VT,.as depicted on project No. 2683, as
approved by the Department of Water Resources.
(2) Each living unit is approved for connection to the Cedar Glen North Water Supply
System, whose source is the So. Burlington Public Water Supply System, approved
by the Department of Health.
(3) No living unit is approved for individual water supply or individual subsurface
wastewater disposal.
(3) Each prospective purchaser of any portion of the subdivision shall be shown a copy
of the approved plot plan, -the engineer's site report and this permit before any
written contract of sale is entered into.
(4) No changes shall be made to the approved plan without prior written approval from
the Division of Environmental Protection.
(5) This approval does not relieve the applicant from •the requirement to comply with
municipal/local ordinances, regulations or by --laws governing the design, layout or
construction of this project.
(6) No public building, as defined in Title 18, Section 1301 of the Vermont Department
of Health Laws, shall be erected on any lot until complete plans covering sewage
disposal, water supply, interior plumbing, heating, ventilation and lighting have
been submitted to and approved by the Division of Environmental Protection.
(8) All construction shall be accomplished in strict accordance with the plans approved
by the Department of Water Resources and the Department of Health.
(9) The installation of the sewage disposal facilities shall be supervised by a
professional engineer and upon completion, certification shall be made inwriting
to the Division of Environmental Protection that the facilities have been installed
in .accordance with the approved plans.
(10) No occupancy of any unit shall take place until the wastewater disposal/water
supply systems serving the particular living unit have been constructed in their
entirety and have been certified by the Department of Water Resources/the Health
Department as being operational.