Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - City Council - 02/04/2013 ito south V I R nM 0 I. T AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL City Hall 575 Dorset Street SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Executive Session 4:30 p.m. Monday ,Feb. 4, 2013 Consider entering executive session for discussion of personnel matters, negotiations, real estate and litigation; and, continue deliberative session on Interim Zoning applications. Regular Session 6:00 p.m. Monday, Feb. 4, 2013 1. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items. 2. Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda. 3. Announcements and City Manager's Report. 4. Consent Agenda: a. *** Sign Disbursements. b. ***Approval of minutes for Oct. 1 &22nd, Nov. 20, Dec. 3 & 17th, 2012 and Jan. 7 &22, 2013. c. *** Financials for the month of December(Bob Rusten, Deputy City Manager). d. *** Update Mileage Certificate Application (Justin Rabidoux, Public Works Director). 5. City Council to Consider Authorizing Entry of Appearance By Legal Counsel In: a. South Burlington School District Appeal b. Rutland MS4 Designation Appeal 6. Council to Hear Information About and then Discuss the Issue of Current City Policy and State and Federal Law Concerning Fire Arms in City Buildings and City at large. (South Burlington Chief of Police and Legal Counsel) 7. Interim Zoning-Deliberative Session: (City Council-Deliberative session on applications closed or presently before the City Council. Deliberative sessions are not open to public comment). [Note: Deliberations will be in open session unless due to a legal issue it is voted by Council to deliberate in closed session] a. Interim Zoning Application# IZ-12-13, Queen City LLC; amendment to PUD to add two new dwelling units, 428-434 Shelburne Road. Council has until 02/21/13 to issue a decision. 8. Interim Zoning-Continued Public Hearings (Applicants and City Councilors): a. *** Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-06, John Larkin, 40 unit PUD (phase 1 of 71 unit project), 201 Allen Road. b. *** Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-14, Pizzagalli Properties, LLC; raze existing Liberty Inn & Suites and construct 32,000 sq. ft. general office building and parking, 462 Shelburne Road. 9. Interim Zoning-Deliberative Session: (City Council-Deliberative session on applications closed or presently before the City Council. Deliberative sessions are not open to public comment). [Note: Deliberations will be in open session unless due to a legal issue it is voted by Council to deliberate in closed session] a. Interim Zoning Application# IZ-12-06, John Larkin, 40 unit PUD (phase 1 of 71 unit project), 201 Allen Road. b. Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-14, Pizzagalli Properties, LLC; raze existing Liberty Inn &Suites and construct 32,000 sq. ft. general office building and parking, 462 Shelburne Road. 10. *** First Reading of Draft Land Development Regulations approved by Planning Commission. (Suggested dates for the Public Hear are: Monday, March 4th or Monday, March 18th, 2013). (Paul Conner, Director of Planning &Zoning). 11. Consider Approval of Additional Member For SusAg/Food Security Task Force. (Rosanne Greco -The SusAg committee unanimously recommends the Council approve Jessica Hyman, of the VT Community Garden Network, to join the task force) 12. Other Business: a. Items held from the Consent Agenda b. Bike Rack—items Council may wish to place on a future agenda: i. Signage at Police Department. ii. Traffic Lights and sequencing. iii. City Street Lights (adequacy/number) at various locations. iv. Dorset Park Solar Array. c. Other? 13. Consider entering executive session for discussion of personnel matters, negotiations, real estate and litigation; and, continue deliberative session on Interim Zoning applications (if needed). Respectfully Submitted: Bob Rusten Deputy City Manager *** Attachments Included South Burlington City Council Meeting Participation Guidelines City Council meetings are the only time we have to discuss and decide on City matters. We want to be as open and informal as possible;but Council meetings are not town meetings. In an effort to conduct orderly and efficient meetings,we kindly request your cooperation and compliance with the following guidelines. 1. Please be respectful of each other(Council members,staff,and the public). 2. Please raise your hand to be recognized by the Chair. Once recognized please state your name and address. 3. Please address the Chair and not other members of the public,staff,or presenters. 4. Please abide by any time limits that have been set. Time limits will be used to insure everyone is heard and there is sufficient time for the Council to conduct all the business on the agenda. 5. The Chair will make a reasonable effort to allow everyone to speak once before speakers address the Council a second time. 6. The Chair may ask that discussion be limited to the Councilors once the public input has been heard. 7. Please do not interrupt when others are speaking. 8. Please do not repeat the points made by others,except to briefly say whether you agree or disagree with others views. 9. Please use the outside hallway for side conversations. It is difficult to hear speaker remarks when there are other conversations occurring. CITY COUNCIL 17 DECEMBER 2012 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 18 December 2012, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S.Dooley,P. Engels,P.Mackenzie, H. Riehle Also Present: S.Miller, City Manager;R. Rusten,Deputy City Manager; C.LaRose, City Planner;M.Mittag,B. Goldberg, J.Knapp,M. Simoneau,B. Stuono, S. Blanton,L. Mlichaels,T.Barritt, C.Baker,M.Boomhower,M. Griffin,J. Biondo,A. Voldman, T. Braun 1. Executive Session: Ms.Dooley moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss contract negotiations and litigation and continue deliberative session on Interim Zoning applications. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: The meeting began with a moment of silence in memory of the victims of the Newtown, Connecticut shootings. 1.Agenda Review: No changes were made to the agenda. 2. Comments and Questions from the Audience, not related to Agenda items: Mr.Mittag gave members a written communications regarding his concerns with the placement of solar panels. 3.Announcements and City Manager's Report: Mr. Miller: Attended the Library Trustees meeting on 13 December. A search is beginning for a new Library Director. Mr.Miller wished Ms.Murphy well in her retirement. Attended the VPC meeting with Mr. Conner and Mr. Rusten. Barre has been approved as the 6th TIF applicant. There is as yet no authorization for a 7th TIF,but another meeting will be held on 16 January. Attended the Airport Strategic Planning Committee meeting. Discussion included a public/private partnership. The next meeting will focus on governance. Mr. Miller asked that this be on the next agenda. Mr. Engels: The first public meeting regarding form based codes was held last CITY COUNCIL 17 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 2 Thursday. The response to the consultant's presentation was quite good. Attended the Pension Committee meeting this afternoon which included the first two presentations from proposals to manage the retirement plan. There will be 6 other interviews. They hope to narrow the field to 2 or 3 by the end of January. Ms. Riehle: Attended the form based codes meeting and felt everyone was engaged. She felt the work of the other 3 committees needs to inform form based codes. Also attended the sustainable agriculture meeting which was equally interesting. Ms. Dooley: Attended both the form based codes and sustainable agriculture meetings. Ms. Greco: Attended both the form based codes and sustainable agriculture meetings and the Airport Strategic Planning Committee meeting. Received a request from the Energy Committee to have City Council members come to their 3 January meeting(7 p.m.). Was interviewed by WDEV regarding the F-35s. Reported another incident of vandalism to her husband's car. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes of 1 and 22 October, 19 & 20 November, and 3 December 2012 B. Review November finances C. Land swap between Lewis Motor and the City D.Approve changes to the 2012 Grand List with the Errors & Omissions Members agreed to remove the minutes from the consent agenda. Ms. Riehle moved to approve the consent agenda minus the minutes. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Consider Appointments to the Library Board of Trustees: Ms. Blanton thanked the Board for appointing people in mid-year. She hoped the Council would make appointments tonight of people with appropriate skills. She noted the Board will be searching for a new Library Director and planning for a new Library. Ms. Dooley moved to make the following appointments: CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 3 Elizabeth Wood 3 year term Elaine Dates remaining 2 years of a 3-year term Donald Jenkins remaining one year of a 3-year term Sarah O'Neill remaining one year of a 3-year term Ms.Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4.Presentation of the Draft ECOS Plan from the CCRPC: Mr.Baker noted they will be taking comments until the end of the month on the website (ECOS.com). He then reviewed the process involved in creating the plan and noted that it was partially federally funded. The plan identifies 8 strategies: 1. Strengthening the economy, including the need for manufacturing sites and work force development. 2. Sustainable, smart growth, encouraging 80%of development in 15% of the County (a map of this area was provided). 3. Water quality and safety, not just flood plains but areas where erosion occurred during tropical storm Irene. 4. Working lands and rural habitat preservation, including forests. 5. Emergency preparedness. 6. Education and skills in partnership between ECOS and Chamber,trying to support schools. Ms. Greco commented that students no longer think of farming as an option and suggested working with schools on this. 7. Financing and governance, including shared services. 8.Public engagement,making sure that lower income and minority populations are not ignored. Ms. Boomhower then reviewed some specific projects: 1. Metropolitan Transportation Plan, including financial analysis of funding and proposed expenses. $1,100,000,000.00 is available for 25 years. The first priority is to CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 4 maintain the existing system($750,000,000.00). The second priority is capital improvements including alternatives to the Circ ($100,000,000.00). Ms.Boomhower noted that$850,000,000.00 is needed for projects, so they are short of funding. Transportation funding will be a major issue. Mr.Engels asked if it is anticipated that the population of Chittenden County will increase by 50,000. Mr. Baker felt this was an"aggressive"number. He said the issue is managing the growth. This is a good place to raise a family, and people want to come here. Mr.Engels noted that part of the form based codes team's focus will be on"streets as places,"and he felt it was important for the team to see this. Ms. Mackenzie asked where jobs would come from for the 50,000 people. Mr. Baker said that number is based on economic growth. Ms. Mackenzie asked in which sectors. Mr. Baker suggested health, health care, education,technical services, and tourism,with a focus on higher wage jobs. Ms. Mackenzie raised the question of housing for an aging population and what this will do the schools and those who need more health care, etc. Mr. Baker said he agreed with that need. Ms. Greco offered thanks for the $50,000.00 grant the city received from ECOS. Ms. Riehle questioned whether open space should be more articulated. Ms. Greco asked if the area can sustain the estimated population growth. Mr. Baker said there is no concrete answer to this. They are trying to think of it in a positive way. There are places with more dense population than here; the question is how it fits in with the community's vision. He noted that all communities are having that discussion. He also noted the number of people who have had to leave Chittenden County because they couldn't find places to live. 7. Presentation on our Pension Assets with Prudential: Ms. Griffin said the report is for the 3 months ending 30 September 2012. In this period, the city saw a 4.62%return. The assumption is for a 7.5%return over the long term. They are now looking at how to diversify assets investment with options for equity, real estate and fixed income. Because the short term was outside of their recommendation, some assets were moved. Ms. Griffin noted that from September 2011 to September 2012,the growth went from CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 5 19.6 to 23.2. Ms. Griffin directed attention to one fund that is in the "red" Other funds are doing very well, and is on a "watch list." 8. Presentation on our Pension Valuation Report: Ms. Voldman said their recommendation for FY13 was between$556 4 The budgeted amount of$600,000 falls in that range. 72 and$611,104. Currently, the plan is funded at 101%. Last year's funding was at 107°/ due to a rate of return that is less than expected, offset by a slowedgrowth Ms. Voldman noted that a few years ago the funded status o �� The decrease is Ms. a long wnooinpayroll. was at 45/o, so the city has Regarding liabilities, Ms. Voldman noted that the payroll in non-public safety anticipated. Public safety payroll is close to what was presumed. There have ve i b ee en 3 less 3 than participants in the plan and 2 retirements. new Ms. Voldman then reviewed the audited financial report as follows: Annual required contribution Actual Contribution $451,351.00 Net pension amount 600,000.00 6,955,383.00 Ms. Voldman noted there is a new standard that won't be effective until auditor will guide the city on this. She stressed that the city is in a good condition to deal with this change because of the improved funded status. FY15, and the Mr. Miller noted that in October 2010, there was city least once a year reporting. He felt the City Council the communityicy change a includesat served by this. are being well 9. Interim Zoning: Continued Public Hearings: A. Continued Public Hearing Interim Zoning Application IZ-12-06, John Larkin,40 unit PUD(Phase I of 71 unit project),201 Allen Road: A request was made for a continuance. CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 6 Ms.Riehle mov ed to continue IZ-12-06 to 7 January 2013. Ms.Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10.Review and Consider Open Space Committee Workplan and Membership: Ms.LaRose noted she is the staff person serving this committee. Ms.Riehle said the committee met several times and feels they need some consultant work to focus on: 1. Evaluation of natural resources outside the Southeast Quadrant(wildlife, surface waters,etc.) 2.Reasse ssment and possible additions to the scenic view corridors(some outside of the SEQ)3.Development of open space requirements in PUDs 4. Site specific natural resource conservation standards(e.g.,ratios of open land to population). Ms possibly connecting with the sustainable agriculture for cothnsultant with the Riehle suggested the understanding that it may result in an additional person being of the presentede. a list of committee members including all members Ms.Riehle then es, Agne,Betty Russell of the Natural,Laurel Williams,esCommittee Mark Depuy, and Jonathan Miller)plusan of Barbarat Bentone Leisure Arts Melizia,Laurel W Dep Planning Commission,Patricia Allen of the Land Trust, Jen Kochman and Ms.Riehle.Ms. Mackenzie said she had a conversation with d Marcel wildlife di view this and suggested ors. Ms Riehle speak with him, especially with regar R d she will Ms.Dooley questioned the goals of the committee. Ms.a ose sai meeting of provide these. She added that half of the first Natural Resources month and all of the second meeting of the month will deal with open space. the"big picture"thinking of ECOS and suggested Mr. Simoneau said he was struck by on's borders. He someone from Regional Planning on the committee the need to consider those communities who share South Burlington's (possibly an suggested the possibility of having owner and possibly Vermont Fish and Wildlife and an independent property Auclair) and possibly a Shelburne representative. CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 7 Ms. Greco said she would like to see the vision and goals but did not want to slow the process. Ms. Mackenzie then moved to accept the documents and committee members as presented and expect the vision and goals statements. Mr.Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11.Review and Consider Draft Clean Air Resolution: Mr.Miller said this is a standard resolution in support of reducing green house gas emissions. He asked the Council to make a policy statement to that effect. The resolution will include steps the city has already taken. Members agreed to wait for a completed document before approval. 12. Review the`Encouraging Good Government in South Burlington" Advertisement in The Other Paper: Ms. Dooley said she wanted to provide an opportunity for members of the public to provide more specifics and for Ms. Mackenzie to provide more specifics regarding her agreement with the ad. Ms. Mackenzie said she will let her statement that she agrees with the letter stand as it is. Ms. Greco questioned Ms. Mackenzie saying that things were done or said in executive session that should have been done in open session. She wanted to hear specifics on this so it can be stopped. Ms. Mackenzie said if it happens again she will note it. She said one example she can recall was related to funding for interim zoning which should not have occurred in executive session. Mr. Miller said the intention that night was to present in executive session some personnel issues. He felt they were close to following the line pretty closely. Ms. Dooley felt the error was"cured"in a couple of hours. She felt there are different models of Council leadership and that it is important to have a respectful discussion of what those are. She felt people haven't articulated their points of view. Mr. Engels said he ran for the Council because he had heard from members of the public that the city was run by a"clique"of people with business and money interests. He felt this Council has made changes, some of which may turn out for the worst. He felt they may not go about things perfectly, but he can see a light at the end of the tunnel. He felt the Council has broad community support. CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 8 Ms. Goldberg said she is a city resident who signed the letter because of continuing frustration. She hoped the Council would take it as constructive criticism. She said it was her feeling that public input was ignored regarding interim zoning and that the financial commitment should have been more clear to the public before interim zoning was enacted. She also perceived a lack of transparency and"dismissal"of opposite opinions. She said she personally experienced that and cited a letter she wrote to the Council to which she received no response. Ms. Goldberg said that in March the public approved a budget in which there was nothing listed for interim zoning. Money for interim zoning was taken from another account. She acknowledged that this is legal,but felt the public should have known. Ms. Greco said most of that money had not been designated for anything else. Mr.Knapp said he was on the Council when that budget was done. Mr.Miller had said there was money in the budget for interim zoning. The City Council chose not to put in that designated amount as an interim zoning line item. Six months later,the Council put the administration in the position of having to find that money. It was then taken from a contingency fund. Ms.Dooley said interim zoning hadn't been passed yet, and they didn't know if it would be passed, so it wasn't put in the budget. Mr.Knapp said part of the contingency fund was to be used to address the HVAC system in City Hall,but that 's not what it was used for. Mr.Engels said those renovations are being done. Mr.Knapp said it is with money transferred from something else. Mr.Engels said he didn't think$300,000.00 is a lot of money in a budget of this size. He added that he agreed with Mr.Knapp that"we should have done it honestly." Mr. Knapp said if there is a surplus, it should go back to the taxpayers. Ms. Greco said some things that are being said are correct. But she said no decision was ever made in executive session. Mr.Engels said he felt the issue comes from decisions made in deliberative sessions. Ms. Greco said that is legal. Ms. Goldberg said those decisions could be made in public. Ms. Greco said the Council was new to the process and did what the DRB does, and the DRB makes decisions in a deliberative session. Ms.Riehle asked if the signers of the letter still think the City Council is not open to other opinions. ft CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 9 Ms. Goldberg said the only committee meeting she has attended is the sustainable agriculture committee and she felt people were not listening to and respecting other opinions. At a recent meeting, Ms. Greco said to her, "You and I will never agree." Ms. Goldberg said people should not be dismissed because you disagree with them. She also recalled an incident when Ms. Riehle said to her, "You're in business,"and Ms. Goldberg said that's not a bad thing. She added that that being"legal" is a fine line. Being "ethical" is more important, and it is unethical to dismiss people who don't agree with you. Ms. Riehle apologized and said she didn't mean to be dismissive. She added that she felt interim zoning addresses a way to engage the public more fully. It doesn't enact anything; it provides time to come to some conclusions. Ms. Goldberg responded that the public hearing was very verbal against interim zoning, and the law says a decision on interim zoning should be made after a public hearing. Ms. Greco also apologized. Ms. Goldberg said listening is the respectful thing to do. Mr. Knapp said a good example of how local government should work is the "complete streets"situation. Before it was implemented,a consultant was opposed. Public Works felt it could work. There was a public meeting with opinions on both sides. The Council said, "Let's try it." After it was implemented,people came in to report that it worked. Mr. Knapp then contrasted that with the interim zoning process. He said the first meeting was the week before Christmas, and the ordinance had already been written by a"clique" which had decided on how to do it. At both public hearings, a majority of people spoke against it, but the Council decided to do it anyway. Mr. Knapp also noted that the statutes require that expert studies should be done or in the process of being done before interim zoning is enacted, and that was not the case. What should have happened is that all the stakeholders should have been involved in making a thoughtful decision. Mr. Simoneau said that for him the letter is not just about interim zoning. It's about governance, and about people's feelings on how the city is being governed. He added that the people who signed the letter were committed to expressing themselves respectfully. He cited the Council's need to build trust. Mr. Knapp then read from the Statutes regarding how interim zoning should be enacted. He added that if that process had been followed, he would have supported it without question. 13. Scheduling a. Date for reconvening discussion on priorities, procedures and CITY COUNCIL 18 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 10 interim zoning matters recessed on December 11,2012: Members agreed to meet for this purpose on 3 January, 5 p.m. b. Review possible options for Steering Committee meeting in January: Members agreed to suggest 22 January, 6 p.m. 14. Other Business: A. Items from Consent Agenda: Members agreed to e-mail concerns with the minutes and make changes at a later date. B.Bike Rack No action was taken on bike rack items. Ms. Greco noted receipt of the letter from Mr. Mittag regarding the solar installation at Dorset Park. It will be distributed to Council members to review. Ms Greco also noted the City Council meeting is still not in the Free Press Community Calendar. She suggested calling another municipality to see how they get in. 15. Executive Session: Ms. Mackenzie moved that Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel issues and to resume regular session only for the purpose of adjournment. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 16. Regular Session: As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Riehle moved to adjourn. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned. Clerk CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday,3 December 2012, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall,575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S. Dooley, P. Engels, P. Mackenzie Also Present: S. Miller, City Manager; R. Rusten, Deputy City Manager; J. Rabidoux, Director of Public Works; K. Murray, Development Coordinator; S. O'Neil, E. Wood, E. Dates, D. Jenkins, A. Harrison, B. Stuono, G. Rabideau, A. Senecal, J.Nick, C. Heindel, M. Mittag 1. Executive Session: Ms. Dooley moved the Council meet in executive session. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Following the executive session, Mr. Engels moved the Council exit executive session. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: 1. Agenda Review: Members agreed to add to the agenda the selecting of a date for discussion of the ad in The Other Paper and the adding of additional members to the Form Based Codes sub- committee. 2. Comments & Questions from the Audience, not Related to Agenda Items: Mr. Mittag: Asked why, in the face of public opinion,the solar installation at Dorset Park is mounted on the ground instead of on the rooftops of the 2 hockey buildings. He said the Park land is supposed to be for recreation use. 3. Announcements & City Manager's Report: Mr. Miller: Attended the VLCT Board meeting on 27 November. The Legislative Breakfast will be held at City Hall tomorrow morning. The GBIC reception scheduled for tomorrow has been cancelled. Ms. Dooley: Affordable Housing Subcommittee met last week. There were 4 evening meetings at the 4 schools. Each had a different theme. A number of people in official capacities attended, and the discussions were very worthwhile. Notes will be on the CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 2 Affordable Housing web page soon. Mr. Engels: Form Based Codes subcommittee met last Thursday. A number of members who attended the Affordable Housing meetings had great things to say about them. Also attended a meeting of the Pension Advisory Committee which met with people from the School District. The Committee received 12 responses to its RFP and has invited presentations from 8 of the 12. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes for 1 and 22 October and 5, 19,23 November 2012 B. Sign Disbursements C. Possible approval of a $.30 increase in the per site visit fee, from $0.60 to $0.90 to Systems East, Inc., for acceptance of credit card payments for City services D. Consider approval of Homeland Security Training Reimbursement Grand (Fire Chief) Ms. Dooley asked to remove the warrant from the Consent Agenda. Mr. Engels moved to approve the Consent Agenda minus the warrant. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Rusten explained the Prudential charge for asset management. He also confirmed that the $10,000,000.00 paid to the School District is the typical payment to them from tax receipts. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the warrants. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Interview Candidates for Trustee on the Library Board and Consider Extension or Re-advertising: A. Sarah O'Neil: Is an avid reader and loves the Library. Felt she could help. Is on the Board of Directors for First Night; also volunteers for the Cancer Society, YMCA and Rotary. CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 3 Understands the time commitment. If she disagreed with a City Council position, she would be open minded and work to reach an agreement. Mostly interested in serving on the Library Board. B. Elizabeth Wood: Lifelong library lover and user; was an English teacher and has been a librarian with health care organizations. Is beginning to get involved on the Forum for Vermont Public Radio, a committee for the United Way, and program planning for Elder Education. Understands time commitment. In a case of disagreement,would make sure both sides are heard. Interested only in the Library Board. C. Ellen Dates: Had a great experience as Trustee for the Pierson Library when she lived in Shelburne. Serves on the Burlington Garden Club,which worked on the front entrance to this Library. Also on the State Garden Club and Rotary. OK with time commitment. In case of disagreement would work collaboratively to avoid conflict. Interested only in the Library Board. D. Amy Harrison: The ad"spoke to me";wants to do some planning as it's what she's done in her career. Not serving on any other committees in the city. OK with the time commitment. CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 4 In instances of conflict, her personal view wouldn't come out in public. Would be open to other committees. Feels this Library is behind others she has participated in, technologically and in available services, especially room for children. F. Kathy Mackin Avid reader, loves the Library; is retired now and wants a project to sink her teeth into and make a difference. Background in project management and fund raising for the United Way. Also volunteers in the "Read to Me"program in the Burlington North End. OK with time commitment. In instances of conflict, would listen, ask questions, and go with what Council wants if there were no moral conflicts. Only interested in Library Board at this point. G. Don Jenkins: Would like to see a separate facility; served on a committee that discussed steps to make that happen. Member of non-profit board and Rotary. No time commitment issues. In instances of conflict would go with the decision of others. Interested only in the Library Board at this time. 6. Interim Zoning - Reopen/Reconsideration: A. Reconsideration of Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-07,Rye Associates, subdivide an 18.01 acre parcel into 30 lots for development of: !) 36 single family dwellings,2) four 4-unit, multi-family dwellings, and 3) four commercial buildings totaling 20,000 sq. ft., 1075 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Rabideau said the purpose of reconsideration is to correct a technical flaw. They CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 5 misstated the number of acres needed to sustain the TDRs. The applicant needs to buy 31 units of development rights from another property. They would conserve 25.8 acres. They agree with staff math on this. Mr. Rabideau said the applicant is still committed to purchasing the rights on a suitable piece of land and feels this meets the Council's intent to conserve agricultural soil. Ms. Greco said she still has a concern with building on good soil but is the only one who feels that way. Ms. Murray said she can recheck to be sure the numbers are accurate. Ms. Mackenzie moved to close the hearing as the applicant has agreed to abide by staff s numbers. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Interim Zoning-Continued Public Hearings: A. Continued Public Hearing Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-08, 900 Dorset Street,LLC: construct a three unit multi-family dwelling on lot with existing single family dwelling,900 Dorset Street: Mr.Nick provided some architectural renderings and pictures of the existing property. He showed a picture of the proposal to relocate the rec path. They would work with City staff regarding the best use of that space. He also reminded the Council that one unit would be affordable. The road would be gravel. All previously stated amenities remain. Ms. Mackenzie said she appreciated the level of cooperation. Ms. Mackenzie moved to close the hearing. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. B. Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-13, Queen City LLC: amendment to PUD to add two new dwelling units,428-434 Shelburne Road: Mr. Heindel said parking matches the current requirements. They could be allowed up to a 25%reduction. They are not sure where any pavement would be removed. Ms. Dooley noted that staff has said the Council needs to see any plan that removes pavement. Ms. Dooley said she would like to see green space adjacent to front doors. Mr. Heindel said they would look at that. CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 6 Ms. Mackenzie moved to continue the hearing until 7 January 2013 with possible deliberation in between. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. c. Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-14, Pizzagalli Properties,LLC: raze existing Liberty Inn and Suites and construct 32,000 sq. ft. general office building and parking,462 Shelburne Rd: Ms.Murray advised that the applicant has asked for a continuation. Ms. Dooley moved to continue IZ-12-14 until 7 January 2013, with possible deliberation in between. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8.Logo for Path to Sustainability: Ms.Murray showed the proposed logo to members. Ms. Greco suggested adding something"growing." 9. Discuss Draft Legislative Priorities: Mr. Miller noted that since Bane has been deemed to be#6 in the TIF line,the city will be asking for special legislation to add a 7th allowable TIF to accommodate South Burlington. Bane doesn't have final approval but Mr.Miller felt they will get it before South Burlington does. He noted there will be some trips to Montpelier needed to testify but felt that since the Governor is supporting this,he didn't consider it to be a huge problem. Ms. Greco asked if the change would be just for South Burlington or could benefit the whole state. Mr. Miller said it is more likely the request would be granted if it benefits more than just South Burlington. Members expressed concern with the time commitment. Mr. Miller said it is crucial to have a TIF District that works well and suggested that staff would report back to the Council if they felt it was taking too much of their time. Members were OK with that. With regard to the railroad crossing issue,Mr. Miller said they would be building on what Michele Kupersmith did last session. Nothing would preclude the city from providing its own solution if needed later on. Legislators would be introducing legislation that might prod the AOT to take action. Legislators will also be asked to keep the city informed so the city can have input on what ANR proposes that could affect the city's Stormwater Utility. With regard to unfunded health care mandates,Mr. Miller said if the legislature wants municipalities to pay for things,the state should provide some of the funding. He said CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 7 the city wants legislators to be on top of this issue. Ms. Dooley noted that everyone is being asked to pay more. Mr. Rustin suggested reminding legislators that there is a tax impact on any mandate. Mr.Miller suggested discussion on unfunded mandates in general. Mr. Miller then explained the process for the City Charter change proposals. Members agreed that these should be handled as two separate bills. Mr. Miller noted that the City Clerk is being asked to perform civil marriages. She cannot do this because she is not a Justice of the Peace. She is asking for the right to do this with the money to go to the city. Mr. Miller questioned whether Legislators should be asked to look into this. He noted that Justices of the Peace might not like it. It was suggested that this be run by the BCA. 10. Discuss FY14 Budget Review Schedule: Members agreed to hold the budget review on Saturday, 12 January, from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. They also agreed to hold 17 January in reserve, incase budget work is not finished on the 12`". Ms. Mackenzie will do a budget article for The Other Paper. 11. Other Business: A. Date for The Other Paper ad discussion: Ms.Dooley said she hoped the discussion could be at the next meeting. Mr. Miller said that meeting already includes the audit(Ron Smith will be here),the pension(Managers will be here), and ECOS. Members agreed to add The Other Paper ad discussion to that agenda. B. Form Based Codes Subcommittee additional members: Mr. Engels presented Peter McCarthy of MBT Bank and Martin LaLonde of the School Board as additional members. Ms. Dooley moved to approve Mr. McCarthy and Mr. LaLonde for membership on the Form Based Codes subcommittee. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL 3 DECEMBER 2012 PAGE 8 C. Response to Mr. Mittag: Mr.Miller noted the area where the solar installation is located is not used for recreation. It was a wiser site than others that were proposed. He noted that using the rooftops of the Cairns buildings could be an issue with the tenant,and the city does not control those buildings. Mr. Miller noted the city doesn't have a formal policy on this. It would fit in with the "path to sustainability." Mr. Engels questioned the"clean air" a-mails that have been received. Mr. Miller said there is a"resolution of intent"which doesn't require the city to do anything. Members were OK with putting this on a future agenda. Executive Session: Ms.Mackenzie moved that the Council meet in executive session to discuss appointments with no action to be taken following the session. Ms.Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: Ms. Mackenzie moved that the Council meeting adjourn. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Clerk LJ b CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 The South Burlington City Council held a special meeting on Tuesday, 20 November 2012, at 4:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S. Dooley, P. Engels, P. Mackenzie,H. Riehle Also Present: S.Miller,City Manager; R.Rusten,Deputy City Manager;D.Kinville, City Clerk;P. Conner,Director of Planning&Zoning; J.Rabidoux,Public Works Director; Chief D. Brent,Fire Department;T. Hubbard,Recreation Director;K.Murray, Project Manager;J.Ladd, City Manager's Staff; B. Stuono 1. Agenda Review: Ms. Greco asked to add a discussion of a possible response to the F-35 petitions. 2. Discuss and Possible Update of City Council 2012 Priority Tasks that were Set in April: A. Interim Zoning/Comprehensive Plan: 1.Hire Consultants Three of the 4 consultants have been hired. An Open Space consultant has not. Ms. Riehle said that the Open Space committee will want a consultant to help with research and developing some LDRs. She understood there was $30,000 in the budget for this. She hoped they could look at a consultant already hired to see if they could add this to their current work, for additional money,because some issues are interwoven. They were hoping not to have to go to an RFP. Mr.Miller said staff is still working on contracts for 2 consultants- Sustainable Agriculture and Form Based Codes. He said this could be included in the scope of work, but that would have to be defined and funding identified. 2.Augment Staff Mr. Miller noted there is discussion about hiring someone for community facilitation and a possible price tag. Mr. Conner added they are looking for someone to help over the next few months, specifically for the public meetings. This would take pressure off staff. Mr. Conner noted the Orton Family Foundation is looking to fund innovative projects directed toward better land planning and is selecting communities for a day-long event. Members of the Form Based Codes Committee are involved in this. A letter of interest has been submitted. There would be no cost to do it,but it would involve staff resources. They will meet this week on the first"hurdle." If the city passes that,there will be several weeks to submit more information. Mr. Conner said he was hopeful, but he didn't know the competition. CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 2 3. Seek Grant Funding The city received and ECOS grant of$50,000. There is an application in for a state grant of$15,000, and the Orton Foundation grant application. The ECOS work has to be completed by the end of 2013. Ms. Mackenzie raised the issue of the economic studies which have not been done and which were discussed at last night's meeting. Ms. Riehle felt there was some interest in doing this, but the timing is unclear as well as the cost. Mr. Engels felt they should be done. Ms. Dooley felt it depends on the cost and the timing. She didn't feel this should be done in the next 6 months. Mr. Miller said there is no additional funding in the current(2013)budget unless something else is cut. They could look at the 2014 budget. Mr. Miller noted the Council is inclined to do the budget work on a Saturday instead of the usual way. He added that there would have to be RFPs that could work,which may be something a little different from what is in the Interim Zoning amendment. Ms. Greco asked if that would mean amending the IZ amendment. Mr. Miller said it depends on how the scope of work is crafted. It would be the Council's judgment as to whether it meets their objectives. Ms. Mackenzie noted that at the August meeting,the process was to be that Mr. Miller, Mr. Rusten and Ms. Murray looked at what was received from the first RFPs. Mr. Miller said to do that now would not be a good use of time because there is no money to do the work. Ms.Mackenzie moved to delay the economic analysis component of Interim Zoning with a process to be started in the first quarter of FY2014. Ms.Dooley said she wasn't ready to commit to this without funding. She was OK with revisiting it as part of the budget process. Ms. Mackenzie then moved to review the economic analysis component of Interim Zoning as part of the FY14 budget process. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Riehle asked if Interim Zoning is still the#1 priority. Mr.Miller suggested going through all priorities first. CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 3 Ms. Dooley said she didn't want there to be"four silos." She noted there are potential conflicts with regulations, and she didn't want people to be working at cross purposes. B.Adopt TIF Plan: 1. Concept Plan for Market Street Mr. Miller said consultants have just been authorized to proceed with a final design. Market Street is part of the TIF and is also separate. It has been identified as a legislative priority and will be discussed at the January meeting with Legislators. It will involve a change in legislation. Mr.Miller stressed that South Burlington wants to get what Milton got. He indicated that wording regarding legislation will be submitted at a later date. Mr.Engels noted that nowhere on the priority list is City Center mentioned. Mr.Miller suggested calling this TIF/City Center. C. Comprehensive Plan: It was suggested that this be called Land Use Policy Documents and include the Comprehensive Plan,the Old Map and the Land Development Regulations. Nothing has yet been done on these by the City Council. The Planning Commission is discussing some recommendations made by the Council. II - Comprehensive Communications Improvements: A. Internal Communications: 1. Analyze IT Equipment This has been done on an"if it breaks, get it fixed"basis. Mr. Miller noted there is no one on staff whose sole function is IT. A rule of thumb is that there should be one such person for every 40 employees. There has been discussion of how best to analyze needed software, and there may need to be a consultant to do this. Mr. Rusten said there are multi layers of issues. This year they are starting to upgrade desktops, etc. Outside people have been used to help with this. Ms.Mackenzie said the situation won't improve until it becomes a priority. She suggested reaching out to someone who has done this for other communities. Mr. Miller CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 4 said there are no resources for this in FY2013. There could be in FY2014, but the Council would have to make that decision. Mr. Miller noted that Montpelier has a 2-person IT Department with a smaller staff than South Burlington has. VLCT has 3 IT people. Ms. Mackenzie said that if you add up the hours you spend being frustrated, it pays for itself. Mr. Miller noted some of the recent improvements including: "Outlook"for everyone, upgraded laptops, standardized operating software, consistent licensed software, remote access for everyone, upgraded servers,4 exchange servers and a backup server, etc. He noted that Chief Brent has made a request to upgrade software for scheduling,payroll and overtime. B. External Communications: 1. Improve Customer Relations Mr. Miller noted the city's"customers"are residents and businesses,possibly some outside of the city. He said they try to respond to all inquiries within 24-48 hours. This is standard in all departments. Ms. Riehle said she felt the e-mails she had seen are very thorough and professional from all the staff. She noted there are some people you just can't make happy. Ms. Greco said she would like to see listing in the Community Calendar I the Free Press. Ms. Ladd said the Free Press likes things 2 days in advance, but there is no guarantee something will be printed. Mr. Engels said that things that are sent as "news"may not get into the calendar. Ms. Greco noted that at last night's meeting Mr. Engels suggested a City Council piece in The Other Paper each month. Mr. Engels said there shouldn't be a disconnect between what the Council is doing and what people think they are doing. He felt that now that isn't the case. Ms. Greco disagreed. She felt The Other Paper captures most of what is going on in the city. Mr. Engels said this doesn't equal what they need to communicate to people. He agreed to be the first to do an article and suggested he respond to what was in The Other Paper as ads and letters to the editor. He stressed that meetings on CCTV, Minutes, and The Other Paper don't equal "public relations." Ms. Mackenzie felt there should be something written on engaging with the public in the new budget process. She was willing to do that. CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 5 Mr.Engels felt there should be an agenda item for the Council to respond to the things in The Other Paper. Ms. Dooley felt that item should not be discussed before 7 p.m. Ms. Mackenzie agreed to do a December column on the budget process;Ms.Dooley will do something in January on Affordable Housing, and Ms. Greco will do something in February on the proposed budget. 2.Website Mr. Miller said there will be an internal discussion on addressing that. Ms. Dooley cited the need to continue to update. 3. Social Networking Mr. Engels felt the Facebook page is really good. Mr.Miller reviewed the social networking of various city departments. Ms. Blanchard has been organizing a Facebook presence for the city. It is very informative and was used to alert people to the coming of Superstorm Sandy. 4. CCTV Ms. Greco felt the city is getting what it is paying for. Ms. Mackenzie suggested working with CCTV to upgrade City Hall facilities with possible live streaming. That should be part of the budget discussion. Ms. Greco said the City makes use of all of the meeting times for which it pays CCTV. Mr. Miller noted that the Council authorized having the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Agriculture community meetings done by CCTV even if there was additional cost. He noted there was no additional cost for the Affordable Housing meeting. Staff will contact CCTV to see what remaining availability the city has. 5. Response to Residents' Concerns Ms. Greco felt"the Bike Rack"was a step in the right direction. She also felt that the City responded to emails in a timely manner. CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 6 6. Inquiries from the Public and the Media Mr.Miller said staff responds as best they can,within 24-48 hours. Sometimes they can't respond to the deadlines of others. Mr.Rusten said there is a question of the appropriateness of answering policy questions, especially future policy. He cited a particular case. III -Airport and Related Issues: A.Noise Issues Mr. Miller noted the Airport is applying for funds to do a Part 150 update. Mr. Maille noted that on the Burlington website,the Burlington City Council has approved funding for a new NCP study. Mr. Miller noted that work hasn't begun. Ms. Greco asked if South Burlington will have a role in the process. Mr. Miller said not in the testing. Mr. Maille said when the results are known, South Burlington can comment. B.Airport Strategic Planning Committee Mr. Miller said he will be reporting to the City Council at the 5 December meeting. He has attended all but one of the Strategic Planning Committee meetings. There is discussion regarding privatization with an aim toward a vote on this in early December. Ms. Greco reported what was said at the airport meeting-that being whether someone would want to buy the Airport in its present condition. And that the consultants who briefed at the airport strategic planning meeting said that privatization wouldn't solve the problems,just shift them to someone else. Mr. Miller said privatization is a rarely used option in the U.S., and it has had very mixed reviews when it has occurred. C. Acquisition and Demolition Program Ms. Greco said she didn't know what role the city has in this. Mr. Miller said they have asked for information and have told Burlington Mayor Weinberger that the information South Burlington has doesn't"fit together." There is discussion about a presentation to the City Council,but until there is data that makes sense,that wouldn't do any good. Ms. Greco said the public wants to know where the Airport is on this. She noted that Bob McEwing has said they would not be purchasing any more homes, and some residents are questioning whether they can be bought out. She asked how the city can respond to them. CITY COUNCIL 20 NOVEMBER 2012 PAGE 7 Mr. Miller said the Airport Commission can ask. The City Council has asked. He has asked about the data.All are waiting for information. Ms. Dooley said she understands there are several homes with commitments to purchase that are being lived in. She wanted to know how many of these there are and where they are. She felt the Airport may not have the money to do everything they have committed to do. She added there has been very little transparency, and it may be hard to change that pattern. Members agreed to schedule a meeting on 11 December 2012, 5-8 p.m.,to finish this agenda. Mr. Engels said he had just viewed an e-mail which indicates that South Burlington has not been selected as an Orton site. Ms. Mackenzie moved to continue the meeting until 11 December 2012. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The session ended at 6:40 p.m. Clerk CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 1 October 2012, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S Dooley, P. Engels, P. Mackenzie, H. Riehle Also Present: R. Rusten, Deputy City Manager; T. Hubbard, Recreation Director; K. Murray, Planning Department; J. Knapp, M. Simoneau, J. Zaetz, L.Levite, B. Goldberg, J. Larkin, G. Rabideau, J. Olesky, B. Ducevicz, J. Stuart, D. Marshall, K. Donahue Executive Session: Ms. Riehle moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel, contract negotiations and litigation and continue deliberative session on Interim Zoning applications. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Following the executive session, Mr. Engels moved to exit executive session. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: 1. Agenda Review: Mr. Rusten asked to delete item #4d from the Consent Agenda. 2. Comments & Questions from the Public not related to Agenda items: Mr. Knapp expressed concern that there is nothing on the agenda regarding evaluation of Interim Zoning, which was a requirement of the by-law. The language is a mandatory "shall." He said that in his opinion as a citizen, by failing to do this, the Council calls into question any action relating to Interim Zoning after this time. He added that evaluation was critical to understanding how interim zoning would affect the community. Mr. Knapp reminded the Council that because the Interim Zoning Bylaw was adopted prematurely, before there was a clear picture of the potential impacts, the post adoption evaluation was critical to showing how the Bylaw complied with statute requirements. Mr. Knapp referred to decisions already made under Interim Zoning and said he didn't know how the Council can make decisions based on regulations that don't exist. He noted that 2 of the 5 decisions rendered by the Council have been appealed, and there is a civil lawsuit against the city. These appeals and the CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 2 lawsuit are based on decisions which appear to ignore or avoid the requirements of the Interim Zoning Bylaw language. He stressed that no statute allows the Council to deny an application for failing to comply with regulations that may be adopted in the future. He quoted the statutes to illustrate his contention. Mr. Knapp also noted that the city added a full time position to coordinate the interim zoning process, and this position was not included in the 2012-2013 city budget. In addition, Mr. Knapp said the Council has only now undertaken studies in 4 areas to justify the interim zoning bylaw. None of these studies has begun, though the first of these is on the agenda tonight for approval of a contract cost of more than $20,000. Mr. Knapp said that the citizens of the city deserve the evaluation promised to them so they can fully understand the consequences of the anti-development regime they have imposed on the city. Mr. Donahue brought evidence of the damage the city's roads have done to the springs of his car. He cited a $434.00 costs to replace the springs. He said the city couldn't tax him enough to equal what it has cost him to fix his cars. He felt the City Council will be negligent not to have a bond to pave city roads. He felt that explaining this to the citizens would gain their support. Mr. Simoneau noted that he is a commercial broker and as such is aware of transactions that might occur with regard to commercial development. He said there is a significant financial services agency soliciting for a space in the area. Mr. Simoneau felt any community would be pleased to have this firm locate in their town. Two or three potential properties are located in South Burlington, but Mr Simoneau said he can't invite this entity because of interim zoning. He said that sometimes the impacts of an ordinance are clear; in other cases, such as this, they are not so clear. He thought the city could be pursuing the well-intentioned goals of interim zoning without encumbering the public with the negative impacts. Members agreed to address the concerns raised under "Other Business." 3. Announcements and City Manager's Report: CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 3 Mr. Rusten: Mr. Miller attended the Airport Strategic Planning meeting on Thursday. The committee will be issuing an RFP for a consultant. Using language from the Airport's plan, Mr. Miller said that "striving and thriving" should also apply to the community. The committee agreed with this. Mr. Rusten noted that the city has received an e-mail from the airport appealing stormwater charges. The Correctional Facility Liaison Committee met and is planning to have a tour of the facility. Ms. Dooley: The Affordable Housing Committee met on 13 September and had a presentation from the Vermont Housing Financing Agency. They Committee also discussed the RFP. Their next meeting is 9 October at 2:30 p.m. They hope to have the consultant present, if approved by the Council tonight. Ms. Greco: Attended the Planning Committee and Airport Strategic Planning meeting as well as a seminar on agriculture and food systems. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes for 4, 6, and 18 September b. Sign Disbursements c. Approval to spend unreserved Sewer surplus for Bartlett Bay Plant Disc Filter Repair Project d. Consider approval for City Manager/Designee to sign the Warranty Deed to complete the land swap between the City of South Burlington and Lewis Family Partnership e. Consider approval of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication between Dorset Links, LLC, and the City of South Burlington f. Consider approval of Resolution to Create a Senior Citizens Organization Reserve Fund g. Approval Entertainment Permits for the following: Magic Hat Art factory - Art Walk - 5 October 2012. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 4 Members asked to removed the 4 and 6 September minutes, the disbursements, and the Bartlett Bay disk filter repair from the Consent Agenda as well as item "d" as requested by the Deputy City Manager Ms. Riehle moved to approve the Consent Agenda minus the items enumerated above. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Update from the Veterans Memorial Committee: Mr. Zaetz reviewed the history. He said they could be breaking ground within 30 days. They have DRB approval and have applied to Act 250. Mr. Zaetz felt the "basics" could be done before winter, with the memorials to be installed in the spring. They are targeting 27 May 2013 (Memorial Day) for the opening dedication. The Committee received over $50,000 in cash donations, many in drop boxes in local businesses. There are several large donations pending the breaking of ground. All the memorials have been ordered. There are also "in kind" donations from local businesses amounting to $35,000. Mr. Zaetz stressed that no taxpayer funds will be used, and there will be no administrative costs. Mr. Zaetz recognized the valuable assistance provided by Tom Hubbard of the Recreation Department. Ms. Levite then explained the "paver" program which will honor specific people who have served. The cost to purchase a small paver is $75; the cost for the larger "square" is $150. This will be placed around each memorial. Anyone can donate a paver for someone, whether that person has lived in South Burlington or not. Ongoing donations will be used for maintenance, flowers, etc. Residents can get information at Sbremembers.org. and also through a Recreation Department link. 6. Interim Zoning - Public Hearing: a. Interim Zoning #IZ-12-11, Larkin Realty, amendment to existing PUD, demolish existing two story, 89 unit hotel, replace with four story, 89 unit hotel, 5 Dorset Street: Mr. Rabideau said they plan to demolish the existing hotel and build a new, extended stay hotel with the same number of units. Units would have a sleeping CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 5 area, kitchen and bath. He showed a photographic representation of the proposal. Mr. Rabideau noted that the adjacent Friendly's property is encumbered by a 100-year lease, so this developer has no control over that property. Mr. Rabideau also noted that when Dorset Street was redone, underground power vaults were placed up and down the street. One is to the front of this property, and that limits the location of the building. There will be a dedicated pedestrian/bike lane and a pedestrian connection to University Mall. There is also a vehicle connection to the Mall. Mr. Rabideau said they are asking for flexibility in terms of form based codes, which generally wants buildings right up to the street. The proposal is compliant with the existing rules, given the power installations up against the street. Mr. Rabideau said this would be a major chain hotel, and they would use the highest quality materials. 30% of the ground floor will be glass, and there will be meeting space, a pool and a gym. He felt this is a great bargain to get rid of an "eyesore." Ms. Greco asked about the possibility of solar. Mr. Rabideau said the applicant has a lot of experience with solar, and there is a very substantial roof. They are willing to integrate that into the project. He did note that credits for solar are expiring at the end of the year. Mr. Larkin said there will be a tremendous savings in energy just by taking down the old building, which is not well insulated and has outdated appliances. Mr. Rabideau said the new building will use energy star appliances. Mr. Engels asked about the water table on that side of the road. Mr. Rabideau said the first 6 inches is decent soil, but below that there is not a huge potential for underground parking. Ms. Mackenzie said this is a nice solution and a needed service in the community. She loved the fact that there is no parking in front and that it incorporates the bike path. She applauded the work and saw a lot of hope in this. Mr. Rabideau also noted the reduction in the width of the curb cut. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 6 Ms. Mackenzie moved to continue IZ-12-11 until 22 October with a deliberative session before that date. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Interim Zoning Continued Public Hearings: A. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-07, Rye Associates, 52 unit PUD with 20,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in 4 buildings, 1075 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Rabideau provided a brief overview, noting that the property is across from Eye Laser. This would be a commercial and residential development with significant green space and a connection to Fox Run at the south end. Mr. Rabideau noted that the Council had wanted more information on affordability. He said the applicant believes 6 units will be available to people making 80% of median income; an additional 4 units would be available for first time buyers. He felt that 10 of the 52 units being affordable should satisfy a requirement. Regarding ag soils, Mr. Rabideau said TDRs would be a mechanism to preserve agriculture in the Southeast Quadrant in a meaningful way. Open space will make community gardens possible. The applicant would offer as a stipulation that they will find donor sites with as good or better prime ag soils. Mr. Rabideau said it was their opinion that the Council cannot impose conditions with regard to agriculture. Ms. Greco said her only reservation is that she feels this is in the wrong place. You can't walk to anywhere. Mr. Rabideau noted there is a significant employment base in the area with Eye Laser, the new medical building, etc. He felt this is a great chance to say to people who say the process is broken that they are wrong. Ms. Mackenzie said she likes that the applicant has addressed affordable housing. She felt they went beyond what she anticipated. She believes that neither the Council nor the developer can get 100% of what they want and that they can work together. Ms. Dooley asked if there is any process to insure that lower income people would get the affordable units. Mr. Ducevicz said this is challenging. They do not have the right to "income verify" people. In other areas they have been paired with a non-profit, and Champlain Housing has a great interest in doing this project. They CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 7 need a time-line to apply for grants. Mr. Rabideau said they don't want to see a "project-like" development which is what happens when quotas are given, etc., as in the City of Burlington. Ms. Riehle moved to close the hearing. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. B. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08, 900 Dorset Street, LLC; construct three unit multi-family dwelling on lot with existing single family dwelling, 900 Dorset Street: Mr. Olesky said they do not have a revised plan, but they have responses from the applicant to some questions raised by the Council. Regarding proposed units and what they would look like, the applicant is thinking of something like the South Village type. All of the units have the potential to be affordable if"aesthetics" don't preclude that. The applicant wanted to know if affordability or aesthetics is the higher priority. Regarding the proposed parking lot, there will be 12 standard parking spaces, 3-4 for use of the community garden, and 8 or 9 to support existing barn activities. Regarding the request to pull the bike path up to join with the path, there is a significant cost impact as there is a 4-6 foot grade change which would require massive earth work and would impact the utilities below ground. They might be able to shift the path a little. The applicant asked for a continuance to get responses to their questions. Ms. Dooley moved to continue IZ-12-08 to 5 November and to have a deliberative session before that date Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. C. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-10, John & Kathleen Pennucci, two lot subdivision, 1721 Dorset Street: Mr. Stuart said the 1.7 acre lot would encompass the house, barns, and sheds. There is no development plan for the second lot. Lot 1 contains gardens, which CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 8 can be expanded. Barns could be used for small scale livestock. Lot 2 is hayed and will stay that way as long as a farmer can be found to do it. Regarding open space, lot 2 is entirely open. Any potential development would be subject to any ordinance in place at that time. The lot would be sold when the subdivision is complete. No issues were raised. Mr. Engels moved to close the hearing. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Review Affordable Housing Committee Recommendation Regarding Consultant Selection and Authorize City Manager/Designee to Finalize and Sign Contract with PlaceSense and Front Porch Community Planning for Affordable Housing Study: Ms. Murray reviewed the process. Three proposals were received from the RFP as follows: PlaceSense & Front Porch Community Planning - $22,900 Vanasse Hangel Brustlin, Inc. And Birchline Planning - $54,000 Community Opportunities Group - $59,925 The recommendation is to go with the low bidder. Ms. Mackenzie raised the question of funding for interim zoning. She felt that if money had been set aside, this would make sense. She did not want to encumber money the city doesn't have. She indicated she will vote against this. Mr. Rusten said they have $75,000 in an interim zoning reserve fund and have applied for grants of$40,000 and $25,000. Mr Knapp asked what was in the more expensive bids that the city would not be getting. Ms. Murray said their hourly rate was higher. Mr. .Knapp asked if PlaceSense is as qualified as the others. Ms. Murray said the feeling is they are more qualified for Vermont issues. Ms. Goldberg said this seems to be a case of"robbing Peter to pay Paul." The $75,000 was taken fro anticipated surplus. The taxpayers approved a budget CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 9 with money for certain items and were never told that money would be used for interim zoning. Mr. Rusten said the $75,000 was in the contingency fund. Voters approved $50,000 for an undesignated reserve fund, but there is no proposal to take any of that money. Ms. Goldberg felt tax funds should not be used for something the public was so opposed to. Ms. Riehle moved to authorize the City Manager/designee to finalize and sign a contract with PlaceSense and Front Porch Community Planning in an amount not to exceed $22,900.00. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed 4-1, with Ms. Mackenzie voting against. 9. Reconvene as Liquor Control Board to consider approval of Liquor License for: Guild & Company, 1633 Williston Road: Ms. Dooley moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Mr. Riehle seconded. Motion pased unanimously. It was noted that this is the former Ground Round. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the liquor license for Guild & Company as presented. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Mackenzie then moved that the Board reconvene as City Council. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Reschedule Priorities and Procedure Review: Members greed to meet for this purpose at 5 p.m. on 30 October. 11. Other Business: A. Items from Consent Agenda: In the minutes of 4 September, it was noted that on p. 8, paragraph 2, Ms. Lyons said the union opposed the City Clerk's proposal. Also on that page, it was noted that in the second paragraph , second sentence, "City Clerk" should read "City Council." CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 10 Regarding disbursements, Ms. Greco asked about the expenditure for protective clothing. Mr. Rusten noted this was the Fire Department, and is within their budget. Ms. Greco also questioned the "overpayment" of taxes by the City of Burlington. Mr. Rusten said that did happen, and they have been reimbursed. Ms. Greco also questioned the two payments for highway technology. Mr. Rusten said these are LED lights/crosswalks and fall under a federal grant for this purpose. Mr. Rusten noted that the Airport Parkway payment is the last payment for this upgrade. Regarding the Bartlett Bay filter, Ms. Greco asked whether they need to budget for this in the future. Mr. Rusten said they need to talk to technical people about that. This is a sewer related issue, not storm water. A filter needs to be replaced, the sooner the better. There is no indication of other anticipated failures. A major refit of the Bartlett Bay plant is planned in 10 years. Mr. Knapp noted that the state monitors the capacity of the system. As of 1 July 2007, the state has jurisdiction over every system in the state and won't let a community oversubscribe. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the items removed from the Consent Agenda. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. B. Items Council May Wish to Place on a Future Agenda: Regarding the interim zoning evaluation, Mr. Engels said they better address it tonight as the Bylaw requires it to be addressed by 1 October. Ms. Dooley said they were going to revisit it when all RFP are finalized. Ms. Mackenzie said they need to have a process now to plan for the economic analysis. And they need to address issues raised by Mr. Simoneau, that interim zoning is keeping people from doing business in South Burlington. Ms. Dooley said her recollection was that the Councilors had different ideas of what the economic impact analysis was getting at. She had a problem discussing this without Mr. Miller present. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 11 Ms. Mackenzie suggested taking a look at the ordinance and seeing if they are addressing what they are supposed to be addressing. Mr. Rusten noted they had sent out RFP on this and we are not comfortable with the responses. The Council then told staff to work on the RFPs for the 3 components of interim zoning. Staff would then try to get better RFPs for the economic piece. Ms. Mackenzie said they need to clarify a due date for the economic analysis as they owe the community transparency. Mr. Engels agreed that it should be addressed tonight. Other members felt they should stick with the prior decision. Mr. Engels said as the ordinance says they shall have an economic analysis by 1 October, they will have to amend the ordinance. Ms. Greco said she didn't see a need to amend the Ordinance. Ms. Goldberg said the Council owes the public a financial analysis to justify interim zoning and they have failed. With regard to a bond for roads, members felt this should be discussed as part of the budget process. Members also discussed having members of the Planning Commission and City Council attend each other's meetings. Mr. Rusten suggested adding this to the 30 October agenda. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Riehle moved to adjourn. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 pm. Clerk CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 1 October 2012, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S Dooley, P. Engels, P. Mackenzie, H. Riehle Also Present: R. Rusten, Deputy City Manager; T. Hubbard, Recreation Director; K. Murray, Planning Department; J. Knapp, M. Simoneau, J. Zaetz, L.Levite, B. Goldberg, J. Larkin, G. Rabideau, J. Olesky, B. Ducevicz, J. Stuart, D. Marshall, K. Donahue Executive Session: Ms. Riehle moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel, contract negotiations and litigation and continue deliberative session on Interim Zoning applications. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Following the executive session, Mr. Engels moved to exit executive session. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: 1. Agenda Review: Mr. Rusten asked to delete item #4d from the Consent Agenda. 2. Comments & Questions from the Public not related to Agenda items: Mr. Knapp expressed concern that there is nothing on the agenda regarding evaluation of Interim Zoning, which was a requirement of the by-law. The language is a mandatory "shall." He said that in his opinion as a citizen, by failing to do this, the Council calls into question any action relating to Interim Zoning after this time. He added that evaluation was critical to understanding how interim zoning would affect the community. Mr. Knapp reminded the Council that because the Interim Zoning Bylaw was adopted prematurely, before there was a clear picture of the potential impacts, the post adoption evaluation was critical to showing how the Bylaw complied with statute requirements. Mr. Knapp referred to decisions already made under Interim Zoning and said he didn't know how the Council can make decisions based on regulations that don't exist. He noted that 2 of the 5 decisions rendered by the Council have been appealed, and there is a civil lawsuit against the city. These appeals and the CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 2 lawsuit are based on decisions which appear to ignore or avoid the requirements of the Interim Zoning Bylaw language. He stressed that no statute allows the Council to deny an application for failing to comply with regulations that may be adopted in the future. He quoted the statutes to illustrate his contention. Mr. Knapp also noted that the city added a full time position to coordinate the interim zoning process, and this position was not included in the 2012-2013 city budget. In addition, Mr. Knapp said the Council has only now undertaken studies in 4 areas to justify the interim zoning bylaw. None of these studies has begun, though the first of these is on the agenda tonight for approval of a contract cost of more than $20,000. Mr. Knapp said that the citizens of the city deserve the evaluation promised to them so they can fully understand the consequences of the anti-development regime they have imposed on the city. Mr. Donahue brought evidence of the damage the city's roads have done to the springs of his car. He cited a $434.00 costs to replace the springs. He said the city couldn't tax him enough to equal what it has cost him to fix his cars. He felt the City Council will be negligent not to have a bond to pave city roads. He felt that explaining this to the citizens would gain their support. Mr. Simoneau noted that he is a commercial broker and as such is aware of transactions that might occur with regard to commercial development. He said there is a significant financial services agency soliciting for a space in the area. Mr. Simoneau felt any community would be pleased to have this firm locate in their town. Two or three potential properties are located in South Burlington, but Mr Simoneau said he can't invite this entity because of interim zoning. He said that sometimes the impacts of an ordinance are clear; in other cases, such as this, they are not so clear. He thought the city could be pursuing the well-intentioned goals of interim zoning without encumbering the public with the negative impacts. Members agreed to address the concerns raised under "Other Business." 3. Announcements and City Manager's Report: CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 3 Mr. Rusten: Mr. Miller attended the Airport Strategic Planning meeting on Thursday. The committee will be issuing an RFP for a consultant. Using language from the Airport's plan, Mr. Miller said that "striving and thriving" should also apply to the community. The committee agreed with this. Mr. Rusten noted that the city has received an e-mail from the airport appealing stormwater charges. The Correctional Facility Liaison Committee met and is planning to have a tour of the facility. Ms. Dooley: The Affordable Housing Committee met on 13 September and had a presentation from the Vermont Housing Financing Agency. They Committee also discussed the RFP. Their next meeting is 9 October at 2:30 p.m. They hope to have the consultant present, if approved by the Council tonight. Ms. Greco: Attended the Planning Committee and Airport Strategic Planning meeting as well as a seminar on agriculture and food systems. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Approve Minutes for 4, 6, and 18 September b. Sign Disbursements c. Approval to spend unreserved Sewer surplus for Bartlett Bay Plant Disc Filter Repair Project d. Consider approval for City Manager/Designee to sign the Warranty Deed to complete the land swap between the City of South Burlington and Lewis Family Partnership e. Consider approval of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication between Dorset Links, LLC, and the City of South Burlington f. Consider approval of Resolution to Create a Senior Citizens Organization Reserve Fund g. Approval Entertainment Permits for the following: Magic Hat Art factory - Art Walk - 5 October 2012. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 4 Members asked to removed the 4 and 6 September minutes, the disbursements, and the Bartlett Bay disk filter repair from the Consent Agenda as well as item "d" as requested by the Deputy City Manager Ms. Riehle moved to approve the Consent Agenda minus the items enumerated above. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Update from the Veterans Memorial Committee: Mr. Zaetz reviewed the history. He said they could be breaking ground within 30 days. They have DRB approval and have applied to Act 250. Mr. Zaetz felt the "basics" could be done before winter, with the memorials to be installed in the spring. They are targeting 27 May 2013 (Memorial Day) for the opening dedication. The Committee received over $50,000 in cash donations, many in drop boxes in local businesses. There are several large donations pending the breaking of ground. All the memorials have been ordered. There are also "in kind" donations from local businesses amounting to $35,000. Mr. Zaetz stressed that no taxpayer funds will be used, and there will be no administrative costs. Mr. Zaetz recognized the valuable assistance provided by Tom Hubbard of the Recreation Department. Ms. Levite then explained the "paver" program which will honor specific people who have served. The cost to purchase a small paver is $75; the cost for the larger "square" is $150. This will be placed around each memorial. Anyone can donate a paver for someone, whether that person has lived in South Burlington or not. Ongoing donations will be used for maintenance, flowers, etc. Residents can get information at Sbremembers.org. and also through a Recreation Department link. 6. Interim Zoning - Public Hearing: a. Interim Zoning #IZ-12-11, Larkin Realty, amendment to existing PUD, demolish existing two story, 89 unit hotel, replace with four story, 89 unit hotel, 5 Dorset Street: Mr. Rabideau said they plan to demolish the existing hotel and build a new, extended stay hotel with the same number of units. Units would have a sleeping CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 5 area, kitchen and bath. He showed a photographic representation of the proposal. Mr. Rabideau noted that the adjacent Friendly's property is encumbered by a 100-year lease, so this developer has no control over that property. Mr. Rabideau also noted that when Dorset Street was redone, underground power vaults were placed up and down the street. One is to the front of this property, and that limits the location of the building. There will be a dedicated pedestrian/bike lane and a pedestrian connection to University Mall. There is also a vehicle connection to the Mall. Mr. Rabideau said they are asking for flexibility in terms of form based codes, which generally wants buildings right up to the street. The proposal is compliant with the existing rules, given the power installations up against the street. Mr. Rabideau said this would be a major chain hotel, and they would use the highest quality materials. 30% of the ground floor will be glass, and there will be meeting space, a pool and a gym. He felt this is a great bargain to get rid of an "eyesore." Ms. Greco asked about the possibility of solar. Mr. Rabideau said the applicant has a lot of experience with solar, and there is a very substantial roof. They are willing to integrate that into the project. He did note that credits for solar are expiring at the end of the year. Mr. Larkin said there will be a tremendous savings in energy just by taking down the old building, which is not well insulated and has outdated appliances. Mr. Rabideau said the new building will use energy star appliances. Mr. Engels asked about the water table on that side of the road. Mr. Rabideau said the first 6 inches is decent soil, but below that there is not a huge potential for underground parking. Ms. Mackenzie said this is a nice solution and a needed service in the community. She loved the fact that there is no parking in front and that it incorporates the bike path. She applauded the work and saw a lot of hope in this. Mr. Rabideau also noted the reduction in the width of the curb cut. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 6 Ms. Mackenzie moved to continue IZ-12-11 until 22 October with a deliberative session before that date. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Interim Zoning Continued Public Hearings: A. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-07, Rye Associates, 52 unit PUD with 20,000 sq. ft. of commercial space in 4 buildings, 1075 Hinesburg Road: Mr. Rabideau provided a brief overview, noting that the property is across from Eye Laser. This would be a commercial and residential development with significant green space and a connection to Fox Run at the south end. Mr. Rabideau noted that the Council had wanted more information on affordability. He said the applicant believes 6 units will be available to people making 80% of median income; an additional 4 units would be available for first time buyers. He felt that 10 of the 52 units being affordable should satisfy a requirement. Regarding ag soils, Mr. Rabideau said TDRs would be a mechanism to preserve agriculture in the Southeast Quadrant in a meaningful way. Open space will make community gardens possible. The applicant would offer as a stipulation that they will find donor sites with as good or better prime ag soils. Mr. Rabideau said it was their opinion that the Council cannot impose conditions with regard to agriculture. Ms. Greco said her only reservation is that she feels this is in the wrong place. You can't walk to anywhere. Mr. Rabideau noted there is a significant employment base in the area with Eye Laser, the new medical building, etc. He felt this is a great chance to say to people who say the process is broken that they are wrong. Ms. Mackenzie said she likes that the applicant has addressed affordable housing. She felt they went beyond what she anticipated. She believes that neither the Council nor the developer can get 100% of what they want and that they can work together. Ms. Dooley asked if there is any process to insure that lower income people would get the affordable units. Mr. Ducevicz said this is challenging. They do not have the right to "income verify" people. In other areas they have been paired with a non-profit, and Champlain Housing has a great interest in doing this project. They CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 7 need a time-line to apply for grants. Mr. Rabideau said they don't want to see a "project-like" development which is what happens when quotas are given, etc., as in the City of Burlington. Ms. Riehle moved to close the hearing. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. B. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-08, 900 Dorset Street, LLC; construct three unit multi-family dwelling on lot with existing single family dwelling, 900 Dorset Street: Mr. Olesky said they do not have a revised plan, but they have responses from the applicant to some questions raised by the Council. Regarding proposed units and what they would look like, the applicant is thinking of something like the South Village type. All of the units have the potential to be affordable if"aesthetics" don't preclude that. The applicant wanted to know if affordability or aesthetics is the higher priority. Regarding the proposed parking lot, there will be 12 standard parking spaces, 3-4 for use of the community garden, and 8 or 9 to support existing barn activities. Regarding the request to pull the bike path up to join with the path, there is a significant cost impact as there is a 4-6 foot grade change which would require massive earth work and would impact the utilities below ground. They might be able to shift the path a little. The applicant asked for a continuance to get responses to their questions. Ms. Dooley moved to continue IZ-12-08 to 5 November and to have a deliberative session before that date Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. C. Interim Zoning Application #IZ-12-10, John & Kathleen Pennucci, two lot subdivision, 1721 Dorset Street: Mr. Stuart said the 1.7 acre lot would encompass the house, barns, and sheds. There is no development plan for the second lot. Lot 1 contains gardens, which CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 8 can be expanded. Barns could be used for small scale livestock. Lot 2 is hayed and will stay that way as long as a farmer can be found to do it. Regarding open space, lot 2 is entirely open. Any potential development would be subject to any ordinance in place at that time. The lot would be sold when the subdivision is complete. No issues were raised. Mr. Engels moved to close the hearing. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Review Affordable Housing Committee Recommendation Regarding Consultant Selection and Authorize City Manager/Designee to Finalize and Sign Contract with PlaceSense and Front Porch Community Planning for Affordable Housing Study: Ms. Murray reviewed the process. Three proposals were received from the RFP as follows: PlaceSense & Front Porch Community Planning - $22,900 Vanasse Hangel Brustlin, Inc. And Birchline Planning - $54,000 Community Opportunities Group - $59,925 The recommendation is to go with the low bidder. Ms. Mackenzie raised the question of funding for interim zoning. She felt that if money had been set aside, this would make sense. She did not want to encumber money the city doesn't have. She indicated she will vote against this. Mr. Rusten said they have $75,000 in an interim zoning reserve fund and have applied for grants of$40,000 and $25,000. Mr Knapp asked what was in the more expensive bids that the city would not be getting. Ms. Murray said their hourly rate was higher. Mr. .Knapp asked if PlaceSense is as qualified as the others. Ms. Murray said the feeling is they are more qualified for Vermont issues. Ms. Goldberg said this seems to be a case of"robbing Peter to pay Paul." The $75,000 was taken fro anticipated surplus. The taxpayers approved a budget CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 9 with money for certain items and were never told that money would be used for interim zoning. Mr. Rusten said the $75,000 was in the contingency fund. Voters approved $50,000 for an undesignated reserve fund, but there is no proposal to take any of that money. Ms. Goldberg felt tax funds should not be used for something the public was so opposed to. Ms. Riehle moved to authorize the City Manager/designee to finalize and sign a contract with PlaceSense and Front Porch Community Planning in an amount not to exceed $22,900.00. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed 4-1, with Ms. Mackenzie voting against. 9. Reconvene as Liquor Control Board to consider approval of Liquor License for: Guild & Company, 1633 Williston Road: Ms. Dooley moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Mr. Riehle seconded. Motion pased unanimously. It was noted that this is the former Ground Round. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the liquor license for Guild & Company as presented. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Mackenzie then moved that the Board reconvene as City Council. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Reschedule Priorities and Procedure Review: Members greed to meet for this purpose at 5 p.m. on 30 October. 11. Other Business: A. Items from Consent Agenda: In the minutes of 4 September, it was noted that on p. 8, paragraph 2, Ms. Lyons said the union opposed the City Clerk's proposal. Also on that page, it was noted that in the second paragraph , second sentence, "City Clerk" should read "City Council." CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 10 Regarding disbursements, Ms. Greco asked about the expenditure for protective clothing. Mr. Rusten noted this was the Fire Department, and is within their budget. Ms. Greco also questioned the "overpayment" of taxes by the City of Burlington. Mr. Rusten said that did happen, and they have been reimbursed. Ms. Greco also questioned the two payments for highway technology. Mr. Rusten said these are LED lights/crosswalks and fall under a federal grant for this purpose. Mr. Rusten noted that the Airport Parkway payment is the last payment for this upgrade. Regarding the Bartlett Bay filter, Ms. Greco asked whether they need to budget for this in the future. Mr. Rusten said they need to talk to technical people about that. This is a sewer related issue, not storm water. A filter needs to be replaced, the sooner the better. There is no indication of other anticipated failures. A major refit of the Bartlett Bay plant is planned in 10 years. Mr. Knapp noted that the state monitors the capacity of the system. As of 1 July 2007, the state has jurisdiction over every system in the state and won't let a community oversubscribe. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the items removed from the Consent Agenda. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. B. Items Council May Wish to Place on a Future Agenda: Regarding the interim zoning evaluation, Mr. Engels said they better address it tonight as the Bylaw requires it to be addressed by 1 October. Ms. Dooley said they were going to revisit it when all RFP are finalized. Ms. Mackenzie said they need to have a process now to plan for the economic analysis. And they need to address issues raised by Mr. Simoneau, that interim zoning is keeping people from doing business in South Burlington. Ms. Dooley said her recollection was that the Councilors had different ideas of what the economic impact analysis was getting at. She had a problem discussing this without Mr. Miller present. CITY COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2012 PAGE 11 Ms. Mackenzie suggested taking a look at the ordinance and seeing if they are addressing what they are supposed to be addressing. Mr. Rusten noted they had sent out RFP on this and we are not comfortable with the responses. The Council then told staff to work on the RFPs for the 3 components of interim zoning. Staff would then try to get better RFPs for the economic piece. Ms. Mackenzie said they need to clarify a due date for the economic analysis as they owe the community transparency. Mr. Engels agreed that it should be addressed tonight. Other members felt they should stick with the prior decision. Mr. Engels said as the ordinance says they shall have an economic analysis by 1 October, they will have to amend the ordinance. Ms. Greco said she didn't see a need to amend the Ordinance. Ms. Goldberg said the Council owes the public a financial analysis to justify interim zoning and they have failed. With regard to a bond for roads, members felt this should be discussed as part of the budget process. Members also discussed having members of the Planning Commission and City Council attend each other's meetings. Mr. Rusten suggested adding this to the 30 October agenda. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Riehle moved to adjourn. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 pm. Clerk CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 7 January 2013, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: R. Greco, Chair; S. Dooley, P. Engels, P. Mackenzie, H. Riehle Also Present: S. Miller, City Manager; R. Rusten, Deputy City Manager; Chief D. Brent, Fire Department; Chief T. Whipple, Police Department; J. Rabidoux, Public Works Director; T. Hubbard, Recreation Director; R. Smith, Auditor; S. Lyons, P. Nowak, B. Stuono, S. McClellan, M. Behr, C. Heindel, B. Bouchard, M. Hennessey, D. & B. Goldsborough, G. Sproul, A. Bouche, J. Flanagan, L. Levite, I. Ludlow, S. Meckler 1. Agenda Review: Mr. Miller asked to add an item regarding a legal settlement with the Heberts under Other Business. 2. Comments & Questions from the Audience, not related to Agenda items: Ms. Levite asked for a response from the Council to the DRB's decision to deny the appeal of the Administrator's decision regarding the proposed methadone clinic. Ms. Riehle said she would prefer to put this on a future agenda. She did not know what the Council could do. Ms. Dooley noted there is a 30-day appeal period of the DRB's decision. Ms. Mackenzie said she would prefer to discuss this with legal counsel so that the City Council doesn't do what the City Attorney has told them not to do. Mr. Miller said he would ask counsel the best way to proceed. Ms. Ludlow felt there are other possible locations in South Burlington for this facility and implored the Council to "speak for the people." 3. Announcements & City Manager's Report: Mr. Miller: Attended the GBIC meeting with Mr. Rustin, Ms. Kinville, Ms. Blanchard, and Ms. Murray and heard the Governor speak about his priorities. Noted that Mr. Engels forwarded him information re: "sunshine transparency." The city's rating of B- seemed fair based on the criteria. After making some changes to the city's website,the city received an A- rating,the highest in the state. Ms. Dooley: The Affordable Housing subcommittee will meet on 8 January, 2:30 p.m. Mr. Engels: Form Based Codes subcommittee will meet on 10 January at Noon. At their 27 December meeting, there was a good presentation on streetscapes. CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 3 Ms. Greco: The Sustainable Agriculture task force will meet on Thursday, 2 p.m. Attended both the DRB and Energy Committee meetings. The Energy Committee is interested in contributing to the work of interim zoning. Ms. Riehle: The Open Space committee is working on their vision and goals. They are seeking community members to work on the committee. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Minutes of 1 and 22 October; 19 and 20 November; 11 and 17 December B. Sign Disbursements The minutes of October 1 and 22,November 20, and December 3 and 17 were removed from the Consent Agenda. Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the consent agenda minus the minutes indicated above. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Presentation of FY12 Audit: Mr. Smith reviewed where the city was on 30 June 2010, including unfunded deficits, non-compliant borrowing obligation, and 22 "not best"management practices. At that time, there was no corrective plan. Mr. Smith then reviewed where the city is now. He said if the city accepts the "write-off'plan, the following will result: 1. There will be a corrective plan 2. There will be fund balance 3. The city will be generating a positive cash flow 4. Management will have institutional knowledge 5. There will be 5 citations of"best practices" 6. There will be no material weaknesses 7. Pension obligations will be refinanced, saving the city money 8. The city will have implemented a"best practices" fiscal system. Mr. Smith then reviewed the "sacrifices" and "hits"to various departments to achieve these positive results and noted that the general fund did not take the brunt of the prior financial woes. CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 3 Mr. Smith stressed that they do not recommend borrowing to meet the approximately $6,000,000 in obligations. They recommend writing them off. Mr. Engels said the alternative to the write-off was to do a forensic audit to find all the "due froms" and"due tos"and this would have cost more than the write-off. Council members thanked city staff and department heads for their hard work in bringing about this dramatic reversal and also thanked the community for supporting the bond for the Airport Parkway Plant upgrade so that bills could be paid. Ms. Greco asked Mr. Smith to confirm that no money was ever"taken" from the city. Mr. Smith confirmed this. Mr. Rusten then outlined specifics of the"write-off'plan and stressed that this has been a team effort. Mr. Rusten noted that some money owed to funds will be written off because those accounts no longer have a purpose. Those funds that have a benefit and use(e.g., impact fees,records preservation, open space special assessment, etc.)will be allocated funds and will no longer be carrying deficits. Mr. Rusten said they have tried to reduce or eliminate "special funds" and are now down to 23 of these. These funds are in separate bank accounts, and any money"borrowed" from any of these accounts is recorded. Mr. Miller noted that the amount money allocated to various funds is in addition to money that is already in these accounts. Ms. Dooley questioned the nature of the money owed to the city that is being written off. Mr. Rusten said it includes grants that could have been applied for but wasn't, incorrect assumptions, activity to get money that never happened, etc. Mr. Miller noted there was some TIF money that should have been applied for but wasn't even though the funds were expended in anticipation of receiving that money. Mr. Rusten said there was also overspending. Mr. Miller said some"required match"money was borrowed from other funds and not repaid. Mr. Miller stressed that it was their belief that this is the "least bad way" to solve the problems. Ms. Riehle than moved to accept the FY2012 audit as presented with no changes. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 4 6. Presentation of Proposed Community Survey from the Recreation & Leisure Arts Committee: Mr. Hubbard said the Recreation Department has worked with the Committee to create the survey which includes a needs assessment and areas to focus on in the future. The survey will be put on line from 21 January to 22 February and will be mailed to anyone without a computer who requests one. 7. Interim Zoning- Continued Public Hearings: A. Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application IZ-12-06, John Larkin, 40 unit PUD (Phase 1 of 71 unit project),201 Allen Road: Mr. McClellan provided a state ranking of soils, noting that some are suitable for some agricultural use but are not "prime." Mr. McClellan said they were willing to stipulate the number of 1-bedroom units that they discussed at the last hearing. Ms. Dooley moved to continue IZ-12-06 to 4 February, with possible deliberation in the interim. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. b. Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application IZ-12-13, Queen City LLC, amendment to PUD to add two new dwelling units, 428-434 Shelburne Road: Mr. Heindel said there are 2 ways to reduce parking. They are losing the tenant in the office building and will eliminate basement storage. That can eliminate 2 parking spaces because of the reduction of square footage being used. Two of the smallest residential units can have only 1 parking space per unit instead of 2. Mr. Heindel said they will ask for a waiver from the DRB. Ms. Dooley moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. c. Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application IZ-12-14, Pizzagalli Properties, LLC: raze existing Liberty Inn & Suites and construct 32,000 sq. ft. general office building and parking, 462 Shelburne Road: Ms. Greco noted an e-mail received from Ms. Vignoe of Hadley Rd. expressed pleasure that Pizzagalli will be improving the neighborhood. Two other e-mails from L Peel and CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 5 G. Rosenberg also supported the project. Mr. Bouchard said they are proposing a 3-story office building, 31,000 sq. ft. After meetings with the neighbors following the last hearing, some adjustments were made. They moved the building to the south side of the site with the narrow side facing the street. They went from 7 to 3 curb cuts. They created some open space in the rear for a pocket park(a path with benches). They"softened"the building. Parking will be screened by an ivy-covered brick wall. The building size was reduced by 1,000 sq. ft., which eliminated 2 parking spaces. Coverage is now below 70%. Mr. Bouchard said they now have consensus from the approximately 30 neighbors who attended the meeting. Neighbors did not want residential or retail on that site. Ms. Greco questioned whether this was compatible with residences on three sides, even with the brick wall. Mr. Bouchard said the wall will also be a sound buffer as well as a visual buffer for residents. He added that they are open to the possibility of solar on the roof as they are doing on some of their other buildings. They will also talk with Mr. Farrell about possibly connecting this park with the park area on the Farrell development. Ms. Mackenzie and Ms. Riehle liked the improvements. Ms. Greco was concerned with increasing the impervious surface. Mr. Bouchard said the increase is only 2%. Mr. Bouchard said they will look at the possibility of signalization at the intersection. That would be a state decision, but Pizzagalli would pay for it, if it is approved. Neighbors spoke in support of the changed plans. They felt a traffic light would be very helpful. All the neighbors who spoke felt this plan would be a huge improvement over the existing situation which has spawned continuing criminal activity. Mr. Bouchard said the state would determine the extent of the traffic study. Mr. Rabidoux said the state would contact both the city of South Burlington and the city of Burlington to ask what they want in the way of a traffic study. Ms. Riehle moved to continue IZ-12-14 to 4 February to get more information on solar, with a possible deliberation in the interim. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Presentation of Overview of FY14 Proposed Budget: Mr. Rusten noted a reduction in revenue from FY13 and an increase in spending,which meat that they began the process about$1,300,000 in the hole. CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 6 The proposed general fund budget is $21,569,305. Non-tax revenues amount to $9,693,586, leaving $11,975,719 to be raised from taxes. The tax rate increase to support this budget is 1.99. Mr. Rusten showed a pie chart of where money comes from and where it is expended. He also noted that the city is making an effort to increase non-property tax revenue and cited revenue sources such as building and sign permits, recreation fees, local option taxes, a proposed police impact fee, fire impact fee, and grants for Hinesburg Road and from the Reparative Board. These total $444,197. Mr. Rabidoux then reviewed rates for storm water, water and sewer as follows: Water: rate increase due to higher operating costs for CWD to manage the city's water system; also beginning a 7-year meter replacement program Stormwater: initiating the budget process for future MS4 permit expenses which are anticipated to cost over$40,000,000. There is also a one-time expense to create plans for endangered watersheds with work to be completed by 2033. They propose to gradually raise the money to implement the FRPs and project an annual 2.5 ERU increase. Mr. Miller noted that as new projects come on line,they will be required to mitigate so that they don't contribute to the situation. About 'A of the total impact is from private property and will be borne by that sector. Mr. Rabidoux noted that because South Burlington is far ahead of other communities, it will take the city about a year to do what it will take others 3 years to do. Sewer: an annual 2% increase in rates will result in necessary cash reserves to help pay for projected 2022 upgrades/improvements to the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant. The budget also includes the first of 20 repayments ($1,270,000)to the state revolving loan fund for the Airport Parkway project(Colchester will be contributing $742,000 of this). There is an increase of$109,532 in the annual charge to South Burlington for discharges to the Burlington sewer system. Given this increase, the proposed budget includes $15,000 to scope the feasibility and cost of an expansion of the South Burlington sewer system to serve and treat sewage from the Proctor/Hadley Road neighborhood. Mr. Miller noted the cost from Burlington is doubling what the city had been paying. Mr. Miller said the impact of the proposed budget will result in a total annual increase (including water, storm water and sewer increases)of$63.00 to the average condo owner and $82.50 to the average single family home owner. Mr. Miller then outlined the goals of the FY14 budget: CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 7 1. Council priorities 2. TIF and City Center 3. Interim Zoning 4. "Path to Sustainability" 5. Improved workers compensation rating 6. Facility issues 7. Intergovernmental cooperation Mr. Miller noted there will be a budget review session on Saturday, 12 January, from 9-approximately 5 p.m. This is completely open to the public. 9. Consider Approval of the Clean Air Cities Resolution: Ms. Riehle moved to approve the resolution with a correction noted by the Chair. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Other Business: A. Hebert Settlement: Ms. Mackenzie moved to authorize the City Manager to enter into a settlement with the Heberts in the amount of$518.92. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. b. Minutes: It was noted that in the Minutes of 3 December, there was an indication that minutes to be approved included those of 1 and 22 October and 19 November, which were not presented. With regard to Ms. Kinville's request to be able to perform marriages,the Council asked that the BCA weigh in on this. On p. 7,the correct designation is NBT bank. In the minutes of 17 December, p. 1,the correct designation is VEPC. On p. 7, last paragraph, the word"not"was inserted between"may"and"turn." In the minutes of 1 October, Ms. Greco said there was a section regarding the financial analysis and economic study that was missing. Ms. Dooley then moved to approve the Minutes of 19 and 20 November and 3 and 11 December as written and/or amended. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL 7 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 8 Ms. Dooley asked whether the city could ask the manager of the upcoming gun show not to sell automatic weapons on a voluntary basis. Mr. Miller noted that Chief Whipple had told a citizen who inquired about this that there have been no problems with the show in the past and that the city was not making any requests of the show. Ms. Mackenzie thought it was much more than a one-show issue, and she would like a fuller, more thoughtful discussion. Ms. Riehle agreed. No action was taken at this time as only Ms. Dooley and Ms. Greco favored doing so. 10. Executive Session: Ms. Dooley moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel issues and to resume regular session only for the purpose of adjournment. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Regular Session: As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Riehle moved to adjourn. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned. Clerk JOINT CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 The South Burlington City Council and Planning Commission held a joint meeting on Tuesday, 22 January 2013, at 5:00 p.m, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: City Council: R Greco, Chair; S. Dooley,P. Engels,H. Riehle, P. Mackenzie Planning Commission: J. Louisos, Chair; C Cole,B. Benton,T. Riehle,B. Stuono, T. Harrington, S. Quest Also Present: S. Miller, City Manager; R. Rusten, Deputy City Manager; P. Conner, Director of Planning&Zoning; J. McLean,D. Rugh, City Attorneys; P. Dreyer,B. Saxton, A. McCrellis, J. Warren, G. Henderson-King, consultants; interim zoning committee members; M. Simoneau, J. Nick, J. Dinklage, P. &B.Nowak 1. Executive Session: Ms. Mackenzie moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel, negotiations, real estate and litigation and to continue deliberative session on interim zoning applications. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Following the executive session,Ms. Mackenzie moved to exit executive session. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session: 1. Agenda Review: No changes were made to the Agenda. 2. Comments & Questions from the Audience, not related to the Agenda: No issues were raised. 3. Announcements& City Manager's Report: Mr. Miller: Attended the VEPC meeting with Ms. Blanchard and Mr Conner. It went well. Attended the City Managers' luncheon with Mr. Rusten. The legislative update breakfast will be held on 28 January, at the Library, at 7:30 a.m. Ms. Murphy has decided not to retire and will continue as Librarian. Ms. Dooley: Attended the Regional Planning Commission meeting which included a presentation of the annual audit. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 2 Ms. Riehle: The Open Space Committee has completed its vision statement, priorities and action plan. Mr. Engels: The Form Based Codes Committee will meet this Thursday. Ms. Greco: Attended the DRB meeting. The Sustainable Agriculture Committee will meet this Thursday. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Sign Disbursements B. Consider approval of an Entertainment Permit-Magic Hat Brewery for February 1, 2013: Ms. Mackenzie moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Discuss City Council Options regarding DRB Decision on Methadone Clinic: Mr. McLean said that what is clear under Vermont law is that the Council cannot appeal the DRB decision. The Council may potentially intervene in an appeal to the Environmental Court, if an appeal is filed by the School District or citizen. Mr. McLean said they recommend intervening at a minimum to get copies of all filings,participation in mediation, conferences, etc. Historically, Mr. McLean said, in this situation, when the DRB has granted or upheld a permit, the city has not actively participated in an appeal of a decision. The city has monitored proceedings without intervening. Appeals to the Environmental Court are heard de novo, as if there had been no previous action by the DRB. The Court takes evidence and will apply the city's land use regulations. The city can observe the proceedings, enter an appearance,to be sure the Court has correctly applied the regulations and that the Court has not exceeded its authority. The city's legal counsel would follow what is going on and report back to city management and the City Council, but would not advocate actively on behalf of one side or the other. Ms. Meckler asked if the city can't appeal that the decision is not in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan, the TIF plan, etc. Mr. McLean said not in his experience, though those criteria do help determine if you are an interested party. Mr. Mayer asked if the DRB recognizes its liability in making their decision. He said there JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 3 were state regulations that should have precluded the methadone facility from being in that location. Mr. Miller said there had been state legislation, but that expired 10 years ago. He added that the DRB is governed by state legislation as long as they stay within their authority. Mr. McLean explained that quasi judicial bodies like the DRB are potentially shielded from liability by judicial and qualified immunity as long as they act within the scope of their authority. This immunity covers them as a board and as individuals. Mr. Meyer asked if the city could pass a law to prohibit such a facility within 1000 feet of a school. Ms. Greco responded that there are some ADA considerations, involved, issues of discrimination. 6. Liquor Control Board: Ms. Dooley moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Miller presented a Class 2 Liquor License request from K-Mart, 947 Shelburne Road. Ms. Dooley moved to approve the Class 2 Liquor License for K-Mart as presented. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Dooley moved that the Board adjourn and reconvene as City Council. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Recess Regular Session to open Steering Committee Meeting: Ms. Dooley then moved to recess the meeting until 7 p.m. following the Steering Committee meeting. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Reconvene Regular Session with the Planning Commission: 8. Discuss Integration of Interim Zoning Committees, Planning Commission's and City Council's work: A. Community Visioning: Mr. Conner reviewed a series of maps including a 2011 image of what exists in the city, a pictorial example of existing development and what has been approved, a buildout analysis showing future development potential under present regulations, a future land use map from the Comprehensive Plan, and a draft future land use map (not a regulatory document). JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 4 Ms. Riehle questioned how to delineate solar arrays. Mr. Conner said that is to be decided. He added that solar arrays are exempt from local regulations as are agricultural structures. Mr. Miller noted that there is concern among municipalities that natural resource areas are not totally in the control of municipalities. The Vermont League of Cities and Towns is looking at ways in which local priorities can be more of a factor in these areas. There is also controversy among communities because municipalities are already having problems siting utility installations. B. Synthesizing Interim Zoning Products: Ms. Louisos said the Planning Commission has discussed the fact that many committees are working on things that will eventually come through the Commission. Before that happens, it would be good to have a conversation as to how that could happen and how work can be integrated so groups are not working at cross purposes. Ms. Riehle questioned how to manage areas where different committees are at odds. Interim zoning consultants were then introduced and indicated which committees they are advising. Mr. Dreyer said the Form Based Codes Committee (FBC) is endeavoring to write LDRs for the City Center and eventually the whole city. He felt that stormwater concerns, affordable housing and transportation mobility all fit into that. The idea would be that the FBC would become the clearing house for all others so they can write an end product that encompasses everything. Mr. Dreyer said they are planning a week-long workshop to include meetings with stake holders, etc. He felt the committees should interface as much as possible. Ms. Quest commented that this is the first she has heard of what some of the committees are doing. Ms. Greco said the Planning Commission needs to speak with Mr. Dreyer about what form they want information in. Mr. Dreyer said they can write a code from any specific or general information. Ms. Greco said she envisioned having the community review options and give their input. Mr. Dreyer said that makes sense. Mr. Riehle said his question is how to put all this together. The Planning Commission is in the middle and he questioned what they should be doing to avoid"spinning our wheels." JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 5 Mr. Dreyer said one thing for sure is getting regular updates, especially from the FBC. Various subcommittees could report to the Planning Commission. They should all be interacting. He also felt that other subcommittee members should show up at FBC meetings as much as possible. Ms. Riehle said there are visions and strategies for the Open Space Committee that interact with other committees. They haven't started yet to work on strategies or elicit public comment. She said it might be important for FBC and maybe Affordable Housing to review these to see how it all interfaces. She asked what the process would be for that. Ms. Dooley said they need to know how density fits into FBC, so Affordable Housing doesn't spin its wheels working on density. Mr. Cole asked what the community would be reacting to. Ms. Mackenzie noted that each committee has a vision statement and she thought the community would be asked to respond to that. Ms. Greco said they could also react to work already done by the committees. Ms. Saxton said there will be some specific recommendations. Ms. Louisos asked when this visioning processing would occur. Mr. Dreyer said during the week-long workshop event,the week of 11 February. He added that anything that comes in to their committee will be put into the process. Mr. Stuono asked the time frame for all of this. Mr. Dreyer said they anticipate delivering a product over the course of the summer for passage in October. Mr. Stuono asked about development potential. Mr. Dreyer said that should fall into place if they do their job correctly. FBC is neutral on growth. It regulates where growth happens. Growth will decrease on"green fields." Already disturbed areas will allow more density. FBC cares about how growth occurs. If growth occurs will depend on the market. FBC is a"very laissez-faire thing." Mr. Riehle asked where the documents like the LDRs and Comprehensive Plan are going to be after this. Mr. Dreyer said those that don't apply will be discarded. When it makes sense to merge,they will merge. As far as the Comprehensive Plan is concerned, this process will inform the Comprehensive Plan. It will produce a map of predicted and enabled growth patterns. C. Process for synthesizing community visioning with Comprehensive Plan: Ms. Louisos noted that in 2011,the city readopted the 2006 Comprehensive Plan with a few JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 6 changes. It is not that up to date. There has been a huge amount of work done on a new Comprehensive Plan. She said she hoped to learn how additional community visioning would get wrapped into all the work done on the Comprehensive Plan by the Planning Commission over the past year. She added that it appears the visioning is not happening at the Planning Commission level but in the committees. She felt this was a"bit of a disconnect." Mr. Cole said the LDRs are supposed to flow from the Comprehensive Plan, so the Planning Commission is stuck. He was not sure how to proceed with the Comprehensive Plan so as not to waste people's time guessing what other people are doing. Ms. Louisos said she just learned 5 minutes ago that the FBC is doing a future land use map. Mr. Cole said it would be helpful for the Planning Commission to hear from the full committees. He added that it sounds like density is "out the window." He asked if there would be a traffic overlay district and noted these are the things the Planning Commission has been working on. The Commission has also identified where it wants density to occur and asked how that aligns with FBC. Mr. Dreyer said that"if you say you want density where there is public transit, we can deal with that." He said they can translate potential LDRs into FBC which is better than traditional LDRs. Ms. Greco said the question is what the Planning Commission does practically to participate in the process. Mr. Dreyer said the Planning Commission can get information and decide what to do with the information and feed that back to FBC. He felt it was critical for the Planning Commission to learn about FBC because in 4-6 months they will be "taking that FBC and tweaking it." Mr. Cole said the process with the stormwater consultants has worked well. He felt the other committees should come to the Planning Commission because Commission members can't get to meetings during the day. Ms. Greco thought it would be helpful for the Planning Commission to identify conflicts in the LDRs. Mr. Engles felt they should all meet at least once a month like this. D. Overall process flow of IZ work between IZ committees, Planning Commissin and City Council: Ms. Louisos said her concerns are that things are spread out so everything is not being done at once. She was also concerned with how best to use the Planning Commission time to mesh JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 7 everything together. Ms. Greco said she thought the products of the various committees would go directly to the Planning Commission,then to FBC, then to the Planning Commission, then to the City Council. Ms. Quest said there should be some fairly close deadlines so the Planning Commission knows what's happening. Ms. Henderson-King said she felt the visioning piece needs to happen first and the outcome of that will help all the committees refine and develop their work products. She noted that Sustainable Agriculture is not planning a public meeting until March. Mr. Engels said FBC has been meeting every other week since July. They anticipate coming out with their City Center work in March, so others can see what it looks like. There will be a template of what FBC looks like. Ms. Louisos noted the Planning Commission did a lot of community visioning regarding the Comprehensive Plan. They have 10 goals, objectives, etc. E. Are there items that the IZ Committees are not tackling: Mr. Miller identified a city Energy Policy and noted the city is working on that with the Energy Committee. He also cited the Stormwater work. Ms. Dooley noted that the Affordable Housing Committee would like to see smaller houses which use less energy. Mr. Stuono questioned how things like traffic, Airport, Exit 12B etc. will be incorporated into FBC. Mr. Dreyer said their team includes one of the foremost traffic experts in the world. They will be addressing that. They also address streets, connectivity and walkability. Mr. Stuono asked how FBC will affect existing neighborhoods and whether homes will become non-conforming. Mr. Dreyer said he would prefer to discuss that with the Planning Commission one-on-one. Ms. Louisos noted that things like Exit 12B are policy issues. She asked if there are policy questions that need to be answered to feed into FBC. Mr. Dreyer said not that he is aware of. He added that FBC is the "regulatory tool kit." JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 8 Mr. Riehle noted that the Planning Commission had a presentation from a developer regarding land not under interim zoning. They want taller buildings. He asked if the Planning Commission were to allow them to go to 5 stories,would that be in conflict with FBC. Ms. Greco said it may not be in conflict,but rewriting the LDRs now, if they're going to be changed a year from now doesn't make sense. Mr. Riehle asked how to respond to the developer. Does the Commission"put him off?" He felt there have to be some ground rules. Mr. Stuono asked if FBC will affect industrial areas. Mr. Dreyer said that remains to be seen. They're not there yet. Ms. Dooley said she didn't want to impeded development. Ms. Greco asked when there would be something city-wide. Mr. Dreyer said November or December. F. Council consideration of Open Space Vision and Goals: Mr. Miller felt the vision and goals were consistent with what other committees have put together and are approvable. Mr. Cole said he is struggling with"environmental stewardship." Ms. Greco said she liked it the way it is. Ms. Harrington suggested a definition of what the "score card"is. Ms. Riehle said this is language used by the Natural Resources Committee. Ms. Dooley then moved to adopt the Open Space Vision and Goals with the modification that the language"incorporate Natural Resources criteria" is added in place of"score card." Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Miller suggested using the actual name of the Natural Resources Committee document. He • t said staff will insert that and append it so it is part of this document. In the vote that followed,the motion passed unanimously. G. City Council Procedures for Interim Zoning Application Decision-Making: JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 22 JANUARY 2013 PAGE 9 Ms. Dooley said she thought the Council is ready to have their decision making process occur in open session except when legal counsel is needed. Ms. Dooley then moved that the City Council procedure for interim zoning application decision making take place in public. Mr. Engels seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Other Business: 1. Items from Consent Agenda: There were no such items. 2. Bike Rack: There was no discussion. 3. Other: Ms. Harrington noted that the bike path on Kennedy Drive has no street lighting and it is hard to see when she bikes home from Planning Commission meetings. Also, a street lamp has been out for months. Ms. Dooley added that it is also dark driving on Kennedy Drive at night. Members agreed to add this to the bike rack. Ms. Greco noted that she received a threatening phone call from an individual who is known to carry a gun. The law says you can't take the gun away from him, even with his history of issues. Ms. Mackenzie said it might make sense to have a presentation from the Police Chief. 10. Executive Session: Ms. Mackenzie moved the Council meet in executive session to discuss personnel issues and to resume regular session only for the purpose of adjournment. Ms. Dooley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Regular Session: As there was no further business to come before the Council,Ms. Riehle moved to adjourn. Ms. Mackenzie seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned. Clerk LJ1 South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 02/05/13 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 2/5/2013 2267 Champlain Water District 49,012.86 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2013 VI-12986 SBWD-273 49,012.86 49,012.86 2/5/2013 2268 Champlain Water District 77,604.76 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2013 VI-12975 SBWD-267 107.16 107.16 1/31/2013 VI-12976 JANUARY CONSUMPTION 77,497.60 77,497.60 2/5/2013 2269 E.J. Prescott, Inc. 115.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/18/2013 VI-12980 4631093 115.00 115.00 1/11/2013 VI-12981 4631308 326.00 326.00 1/18/2013 VI-12982 4632842 -326.00 -326.00 2/5/2013 2270 Office Essentials 171.55 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/19/2013 VI-12983 28116 171.55 171.55 2/5/2013 2271 City Of South Burlington 250,108.53 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2013 VI-12977 JANUARY SEWER 250,108.53 250,108.53 2/5/2013 2272 City Of South Burlington 182,603.17 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/31/2013 VI-12978 JANUARY STORMWATER 182,603.17 182,603.17 2/5/2013 2273 So.Burlington Public Works 7,820.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/28/2013 VI-12985 PERMITS 7,820.00 7,820.00 2/5/2013 2274 SoVerNet, Inc. 45.15 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/15/2013 VI-12984 3205979 45.15 45.15 2/5/2013 2275 Ti-Sales Inc. 64.29 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 1/23/2013 VI-12979 INV0020613 64.29 64.29 Printed: January 31, 2013 Page 1 of 2 South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 02/05/13 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid Total Amount Paid: 567,545.31 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Printed: January 31, 2013 Page 2 of 2 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 1 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check Check vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date A C S AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES I 869419 DECEMBER 2012 2553.00 0.00 . /--/-- A C S AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES I 869420 ADD FULL SERVICE INDEXIN 832.50 0.00 . /--/-- ALL ALL CYCLE WASTE INC 2117749 DUMPSTER - LANDFILL 825.19 0.00 . /--/-- AMAZON AMAZON.COM CORPORATE CREDIT 248754568773 BOOKS 9.00 0.00 . /--/-- AMAZON AMAZON.COM CORPORATE CREDIT 011944715602 BOOKS 31.97 0.00 . /--/-- AMEPL1 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 087958-12114 APA & AICP MEMBER-MURRAY 429.00 0.00 . /--/-- AT&T AT&T MOBILITY 292101152013 MOBILE PHONES 208.70 0.00 . /--/-- AT&T AT&T MOBILITY 623X01152013 PW MOBILE PHONES 194.58 0.00 . /--/-- BARTOL BARTOL, PH.D., CURT R 01122013 EVALUATION 25.00 0.00 . /--/-- BEHARS BEHAR, SHARON 55229 REFUND - SRI PROGRAM 90.00 0.00 . /--/-- BENNER BENNER, PATRICK BCA02012013 BCA ATTEND THRU 2/1/13 93.50 0.00 . /--/-- BENNETT BENNETT, CAROL 55205 YOGA INSTRUCTOR 432.00 0.00 . /--/-- BENOURE BENOURE PLUMBING & HEATING INC 96348 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 142.51 0.00 . /--/-- SIRENS SIRENS ACE 764219/3 FASTENERS 4.72 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764078/3 FASTENERS & BLADE HACKS 24.07 0.00 . /--/-- RISERS RISERS ACE 764074/3 INSULATION 4.99 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764115/3 TUBE VINYL 3.87 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 763931/3 MISC. SUPPLIES 101.22 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764017/3 PLANT SUPPLIES 11.27 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764274/3 DOOR STOP - MED. CONF. R 7.49 0.00 . /--/ -- BIBENS RISERS ACE 764252/3 REFUND - UTILITY HEATER -35.99 0.00 . /--/- SIRENS BIBENS ACE 764231/3 UTILITY HEATER 35.99 0.00 . /--/-- 3ENS RISERS ACE 764244/3 SYRINGES 5.49 0.00 . /--/-- aENS BIBENS ACE 764298/3 SUPER GLUE 11.98 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS RISERS ACE 764310/3 FASTENERS 11.34 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764216/3 KEYS & PLUNGERS 27.43 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS SIRENS ACE 764371/3 VINYL SHEETS 58.98 0.00 . /--/-- BIBENS BIBENS ACE 764384/3 SCREWDRIVER BIT SET 10.99 0.00 . /--/-- SIRENS BIBENS ACE 764396/3 PROPANE REFILL 35.99 0.00 . /--/-- BOLTON BOLTON VALLEY SKI RESORT INC 012013 AFTER SCHOOL SKI PROGRAM 4625.00 0.00 . /--/-- BOLTON BOLTON VALLEY SKI RESORT INC 012313 AFTER SCHOOL SRI PROGRAM 3140.00 0.00 . /--/-- BOUND BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 80975863 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 340.46 0.00 . /--/-- BUCKHUR BUCKHURST FISH & JACQUEMART IN 03055.00B-2 TRAFFIC REVIEWS 1260.00 0.00 . /--/-- BURGESS BURGESS, WILLIAM BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 113.50 0.00 . /--/-- BURLCO BURLINGTON COMMUNCIATIONS 20134995 ANNUAL DATABASE CLEANUP 85.00 0.00 . /--/-- BUS BUS PARTS WAREHOUSE IN00460557 BOOSTER PUMP 202.18 0.00 . /--/-- CANONSOL CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA 414989 PW - QTRLY MAINTENANCE 123.54 0.00 . /--/-- -CAREERSER CAREER SERVICES 20130116-3 SPRING JOB FAIR '13 REGI 100.00 0.00 . /--/-- CARGIL CARGILL INC - SALT DIVISION 2900937955 DEICER SALT 1692.34 0.00 . /--/-- CARGIL CARGILL INC - SALT DIVISION 2900940154 DEICER SALT 3660.30 0.00 . /--/-- CARGIL CARGILL INC - SALT DIVISION 2900942996 DEICER SALT 1645.18 0.00 . /--/- CARGIL CARGILL INC - SALT DIVISION 2900953794 DEICER SALT 5570.08 0.00 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27400 OIL 179.40 - 3.59 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27413 HOSE CONN 3.43 0.07 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-25642 TIE ROD END 50.69 1.01 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27113 TUBE 9.59 0.19 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27055 VACUUM TUBING 11.91 0.24 . /--/-- "aRQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27036 OIL FILTER 2.62 0.05 . /--/-- {QUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-26977 BRAKE PAD 46.96 0.94 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26121 CAPSULE STANDARD 46.14 0.92 . /--/-- 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 2 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check .c Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27018 OIL FILTER 5.30 0.11 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-25553 0 RING 5.20 0.10 • /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-26602 FUEL'FILTER 28.39 0.57 • /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26223 SUPERCLEAN 53.99 1.08 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27081 CHIPPER PARTS 19.49 0.39 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27115 STARTER 258.29 5.17 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26518 CLAMP 3.86 0.08 . /__/-_ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27164 PLANT SUPPLIES 9.78 0.20 . /__/-_ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27477 CLAMP 3.86 0.08 . /__/_ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27677 FUEL FILTERS 15.36 0.31 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27682 OIL FILTER 18.70 0.37 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26649 CAR WASH 63.47 1.27 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS • 11138-25961 RETURN - THERMO & ACID -28.22 -0.56 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27791 HOSE CONNECTOR 2.74 0.05 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27818 VEHICLE PARTS 16.44 0.33 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27649 HYDRAULIC FITTING 38.22 0.76 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27907 HYDRAULICS 35.76 0.72 . /--/-- CAROB! CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27227 WASHER SOLVENT 23.68 0.48 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26930 SEALANT 13.79 0.28 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-28005 SHOP SUPPLIES 11.43 0.23 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-26955 CIRCUIT BREAKER 23.58 0.47 . /__/__ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11141-27997 OIL 44.04 0.88 . /--/-- CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-27047 CIRCUIT BREAKER 12.30 0.25 __ CARQUE CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 11138-27019 OIL FILTER 35.70 0.71 . , -/__ CCA CHITTENDEN COMMUNITY ACTION 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 1000.00 0.00 . /__/__ CHAMVAAA CHAMPLAIN VALLEY AGENCY ON AGI 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 3000.00 0.00 . /--/__ CHARLI CHARLEBOIS TRUCK PARTS INC 1230160028 RUBBER HOOD CATCH 51.72 0.00 . /--/-- CHITEMFS CHITTENDEN COUNTY EMERGENCY FO 01/13 01/13 DONATION 50.00 0.00 . /_-/__ CHITRE CRITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLA 3605 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHY 3000.00 0.00 . /__/_- CHITRE CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLA 3615 TECH ASSIST PER NOV AGRE 1500.00 0.00 . /--/-- CIGNA TN CIGNA 01172013 REFUND - N/C CLAIM #1060 470.20 0.00 . /__/__ CIMONET CIMONETTI, WILLIAM J BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 40.00 0.00 . /__/_- CLARKS CLARK'S TRUCK CENTER 317866 VALVE & COLLAR 259.76 0.00 . /--/-- CLARKS CLARK'S TRUCK CENTER 318040 LIGHT 11.12 0.00 . /_-/-_ CLARKS CLARK'S TRUCE CENTER 318032 COLLAR 3.28 0.00 . /__/__ CLEAN WAT CLEAN WATER, INC. 5422 STOPCOCK 90.09 0.00 . /__/_- COLLINSL COLLINS, LOUANN 01302013 REFUND - OVERPAID 30.00 0.00 . /__/__ COMCAST COMCAST 02010228PW13 HIGHWAY/DPW 107.00 0.00 . /--/-- COMCAST COMCAST 01210220PD13 P/D INTERNET 3.03 0.00 /--/-- COMCAST COMCAST 12200119PD12 P/D INTERNET 146.31 0.00 . /__/__ COMCAST COMCAST 01200219PD13 P/D INTERNET 141.90 0.00 . /__/__ COMHEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF BU 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 500.00 0.00 . /__/__ COMMITT COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 3800.00 0.00 . /__/__ CREATIVE CREATIVE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 12-156 ANNUAL MAINT-CIS RECORDS 150.00 0.00 . /__/_- CREATIVEP CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC 55626 YOUTH T-SHIRTS 1365.28 0.00 . /--/-- CVCPAGING CENTRAL VERMONT COMMUNICATIONS 10275620 EXTRA PHONE LINE 11.25 0.00 . /--/-- DE LAGS DE LAGS LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVI 16530102 COPIER - LIBRARY 172.07 0.00 . /--/-- DE LAGE DE LAGS LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVI 16548224 CLERK COPIER 127.51 0.00 . DISCOUNT DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY P29099990001 ART SUPPLIES 220.23 0.00 DISCOUNT DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY P29131790001 ART BIN WITH LID 417.42 0.00 . /_-/__ 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 3 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check Check r vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date DOOLEY DOOLEY, SANDRA BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 35.00 0.00 . /--/-- DUBRUL DUBRUL, KYLE & PAMELA 01302013 REFUND - NOV. PAID TWICE 3717.73 0.00 . /--/-- EASTER EASTERN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION 3805666 DURAPOWER BELT 4.65 0.00. . /--/- ENGELS P ENGELS, PAUL BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 17.50 0.00 . /--/- EXXON EXXON MOBIL 139900301 UN7MAnED FUEL 68.76 0.00 . /--/- FAIR FAIRFIELD LLC, HOWARD P 180236 VEHICLE PARTS 362.39 0.00 /--/- FAIRPOINT FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2-6503JAN13 STATION #1 #2 INTERCOM 54.83 0.00 . /--/-- FAIRPOINT FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 4-78819JAN13 DSL STANDALONE 49.99 0.00 . /--/-- FASTEN FASTENAL COMPANY VTBUR173019 NUTS & WASHERS 21.97 0.00 . /--/-- FASTEN FASTENAL COMPANY VTBUR173020 TOOL 28.29 0.00 . /--/-- FIREETC FIRE TECH & SAFETY OF NEW ENGL 129586 CONNECTOR KIT 56.00 0.00 . /--/-- FIREETC FIRE TECH & SAFETY OF NEW ENGL 129570 CONNECTOR KIT 50.00 0.00 . /--/-- FIREETC FIRE TECH & SAFETY OF NEW ENGL 129545 CONNECTOR KIT 50.00 0.00 . /--/-- FIREETC FIRE TECH & SAFETY OF NEW ENGL 129543 SUPPLIES 54.18 0.00 . /--/-- FOLEY FOLEY DISTRIBUTING CORP 096943 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 362.29 0.00 . /--/-- FOLLETT FOLLETT SOFTWARE COMPANY 1050367 LABELS 129.06 0.00 . /--/-- FROSTMAN FROSTMAN, DAN 01172013 2/10/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /--/-- FUN FUN EXPRESS 655409360-01 VALENTINE'S DAY TREATS 156.00 0.00 . /--/-- G & K SER G & K SERVICES 1295669160 UNIFORMS 95.46 0.00 /--/-- G & K SER G & K SERVICES 1295671673 UNIFORMS 91.00 0.00 . /--/-- G & K SER G & K SERVICES 1295674204 UNIFORMS 91.00 0.00 . /--/-- GALLS GALLS, LLC 000320452 SABRE JACKET 445.66 0.00 . /--/-- F,LS GALLS, LLC 000331752 UNIFORMS 840.71 0.00 . /--/-- �LS GALLS, LLC 000340355 UNIFORMS 204.00 0.00 . /--/-- GALLS GALLS, LLC 000348727 NAMETAG 9.62 0.00 . /--/- GALLS GALLS, LLC 000348819 WIRE HEADSET 131.67 0.00 . /--/-- GOLD STAR GOLD STAR DOG TRAINING 119 DOG TRAINING CLASSES 955.00 0.00 . /--/-- GREEPW GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATI 213541JAN13 VAN SICELEN PMPNG STAT'N 6.48 0.00 . /--/-- GREEPW GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATI 2022012513 STRMMYLIGHTS 7654.70 0.00 . /--/-- GREEPW GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATI 2024012513 REC DEPARTMENT 580.23 0.00 . /--/- GREEPW GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATI 208782JAN13 LAUREL HILL DR STORM STA 21.28 0.00 . /--/-- GREEPW GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATI 2023012513 TRAFFIC LIGHTS 2963.65 0.00 . /--/-- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230115005 OIL CHANGE 54.58 0.00 . /--/-- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230108005 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 665.05 0.00 . /--/- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230117004 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 442.89 0.00 . /--/-- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230110005 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 224.34 0.00 . /--/-- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230122001 VEHICLE REPAIRS 1259.31 0.00 . /--/-- GSM GSM ENTERPRISES, INC. 230121003 VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR 1129.18 0.00 . /--/-- GUERRERO GUERRERO, LISA 55241 ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR 560.00 0.00 . /--/-- HANNAFD HANNAFORD CHARGE SALES 3381 DISTILLED WATER 30.96 0.00 . /--/-- HARTMAN HARTMAN, CINDI 55279 DRIVER'S ED INSTRUCTOR 12850.00 0.00 . /--/-- HAUN HAUN SPECIALTY GASES, INC 8857350 OXYGEN 32.00 0.00 /--/-- HERITAGEF HERITAGE FORD 873670 KEY 13.90 0.00 . /--/- HERITAGEF HERITAGE FORD 874167 VALVE ASSEMBLY 46.26 0.00 . /--/-- HOMESHARE HOMESHARE VERMONT 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 2500.00 0.00 . /--/-- HOWARD HOWARD CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVIC 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 5000.00 0.00 . /--/-- HOYLE HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES INC 0051171 PROJECT #107838.00 APWWT 3844.42 0.00 . /--/-- "OYLE HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES INC 0051172 PROJECT #107814.00 STMWT 130.00 0.00 . /--/-- ILE HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES INC 0051173 PROJECT #107845,00 STMWT 4257.50 0.00 . /--/-- IACP IACP 1001042288 MEMBER #1554264 RENEWAL 120.00 0.00 . /--/-- 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 4 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check a Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date IDEXX IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 265317025 LAB SUPPLIES 375.59 0.00 . /__/__ IEDC INTERN'L ECONOMIC DEV. COUNCIL 2013 MEMBERS MEMBER ID# 265599 RENEWA 345.00 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60517471 BOOKS 84.63 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60517475 BOOKS 330.80 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 66346858 BOOKS 175.65 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60517472 BOOKS 19.24 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60517473 BOOKS 13.74 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60517474 BOORS 42.87 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 66346857 BOOKS 8.80 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520084 BOOKS 13.74 0.00 . /__/__ INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520083 BOOKS 5.47 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520082 BOOKS 9.43 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520079 BOOKS 10.02 0.00 . /__/_- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520080 BOOKS 137.92 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 60520081 BOOKS 41.21 0.00 . /--/-- INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 66346856 BOOKS 35.71 0.00 . /__/__ INGRAM INGRAM LIBRARY SERVICES 66346855 BOOKS 24.66 0.00 . /__/__ INTSARM INTERSTATE ARMS CORP 501330-03 SUPPLIES - FIREARMS 360.00 0.00 . /_-/__ INTSARM INTERSTATE ARMS CORP 501330-01 RANGE SUPPLIES 21.50 0.00 . /__/__ INTSARM INTERSTATE ARMS CORP 501330-00 RANGE SUPPLIES 271.48 0.00 . /__/__ INTSARM INTERSTATE ARMS CORP 501330-02 RANGE SUPPLIES 629.00 0.00 /__/__ J C J C IMAGE, INC. 00014372 CORPORATE EMBROIDERY 39.98 0.00 . /__/__ JAZ JAZZERCISE JANUARY2013 JAZZERCISE INSTRUCTOR 870.00 0.00 '-- KEMIRA KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC 9017315721 ALUMINUM SULFATE 1463.09 0.00 • , -/-- KEMIRA KEMIRA WATER SOLUTIONS INC 9017315722 ALUMINUM SULFATE 2934.82 0.00 . /--/-- KITARA KITARA, INC 492 DEPOSIT - 8/8/13 PERFORM 75.00 0.00 . /-_/__ LABERGES LABERGE'S 653165 GUNSMITHING SERVICES 300.00 0.00 . /__/__ LAMOUR LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON 36259 STP 5200(18); PROJ #0910 369.72 0.00 . /__/__ LAMOUR LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON 36343 SUSTAINABLE AG/FOOD SEC. 9019.30 0.00 . /__/__ LAMOUR LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON 35820 STP5200(18) PROJ: 09100 451.92 0.00 . /__/__ LANDIA LANDIA, INC. 9405 GEARBOX 124.07 0.00 . /__/_- LENNY LENNY'S SHOE AND APPAREL 53566 WINTER JACKET - PAROT 88.19 0.00 . /__/__ LENNY LENNY'S SHOE AND APPAREL 53643 BOOTS - ROUND 170.00 0.00 . /__/__ LENNY LENNY'S SHOE AND APPAREL 52291 BOOTS - ADAMS 104.99 0.00 . /__/__ LETS LET'S PARTY INC 0342 MUGS & BEARS 2455.04 0.00 . /--/-- MARSH MARSHALL TIRE GROUP INC 25936 LOADER TIRE LEAKING 185.45 0.00 . /_-/_- MCBRIDE MCBRIDE, MAEVE 55204 YOGA INSTRUCTOR 1188.00 0.00 . /--/-- MI MISKAVAGE, ANDREW 01172013 2/10/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /--/-- MONAGHAN MONAGHAN SAFAR DWIGHT PLLC. 1249 AIRPORT TAX APPEALS 780.00 0.00 . /_-/__ MONAGHAN MONAGHAN SAFAR DWIGHT PLLC. 1328 AIRPORT TAX APPEALS 300.00 0.00 . /--/-- MONAGHAN MONAGHAN SAFAR DWIGHT PLLC. 1031 AIRPORT TAX APPEAtS 1240.50 0.00 . /__/_- MYERSSUE MYERS, SUSANNAH 55276 TAEKWONDO INSTRUCTOR 995.00 0.00 . /__/__ NATAUD NATIONAL AUDIO COMPANY, INC. 633441 CD/DVD BINDERS 123.47 0.00 . /_-/-_ NATAUD NATIONAL AUDIO COMPANY, INC. 633440 DIVIDERS & BINDERS 123.19 0.00 . /__/__ NEEDLERK NEEDLER, KAREN 55241-1 SAT BOOTCAMP INSTRUCTOR 1095.00 0.00 . /__/__ NEMUNI NEW ENGLAND MUNICIPAL RESOURCE 27262 2012 TAX FORMS 94.50 0.00 . /-_/-- NORRCNTL NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES 315058 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1083.31 0.00 . /__/_- NORTHNSF NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC 900266322 PURELL DISPENSERS 330.57 0.00 . NOWAK NOWAK, PATRICIA BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 114.00 0.00 . _ NOWAKR NOWAK, ROBERT BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 68.50 0.00 . /__/-- 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 5 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check Check vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date O'DANIEL O'DANIEL, SUE 01172013 2/10/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /__/__ OCC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS 1202252990 PHYSICAL 155.50 0.00 . /__/_- OFFESS OFFICE ESSENTIALS OF VERMONT 28125 BINDER CLIPS 1.98 0.00 OFFESS OFFICE ESSENTIALS OF VERMONT 28098 STAMP/DATER 54.49 0.00 . /--/-- OFFESS OFFICE ESSENTIALS OF VERMONT 28108 PAPER & INK CARTRIDGES 511.05 0.00 . /__/__ OFFESS OFFICE ESSENTIALS OF VERMONT 28142 TONER 84.82 0.00 . /__/__ OFFESS OFFICE ESSENTIALS OF VERMONT 28141 PAPER 82.89 0.00 OFFMAX OFFICE MAX INCORPORATED 961532 PAPER & MISC. SUPPLIES 79.44 0.00 . /__/__ OTHER OTHER PAPER 4192 LEGAL NOTICE 59.60 0.00 OTHER OTHER PAPER 4208 SURVEY AD 176.00 0.00 . /__/__ PACT PACT 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 1200.00 0.00 . /__/__ PAWPRINT PAW PRINT & MAIL 51503 NEWSPAPER INSERT 351.02 0.00 . /__/__ PEPPER PEPPER, J W & SON INC 01L24562 SHEET MUSIC 116.59 0.00 . /__/__ PERMA PERMA-LINE CORP OF NEW ENGLAND 137937 TRAFFIC SIGNS 260.45 0.00 PICARD PICARD, MARGARET BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 98.00 0.00 . /__/__ PITHY PITNEY BOWES PURCHASE POWER 01172013 PD POSTAGE METER 200.00 0.00 . /__/-_ PLACE PLACE SENSE 375 IZ-PATH TO SUSTAIN OUTRE 1365.00 0.00 . /__/__ PLACE PLACE SENSE 376 IZ-AFFORDABLE HODS. STUD 3974.70 0.00 . /-_/__ PRATTSMIT PRATT & SMITH, INC 4773 TROUBLESHOOT MIXER BART. 788.68 0.00 . /--/-- PRIAC PRIAC IN-015262DEC PLAN FEES-DEC 2012 4543.95 0.00 . /--/-- PRICE PRICE, LOIS 01172013 2/10/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /--/-- PRICE PRICE, LOIS 01282013 3/21/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /__/__ ''CE PRICE, LOIS 01082013 2/21/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 /-_/__ .a TEE QUEEN CITY STEEL COMPANY 193685 REBAR 44.80 0.00 . /-_/__ RADION RADIO NORTH GROUP INC 24130299 SERVICE & REPAIR 450.00 0.00 ' RADION RADIO NORTH GROUP INC 24130300 REPAIRED LAPTOP 90.00 0.00 . /__/-_ RADION RADIO NORTH GROUP INC 24130341 VEHICLE REPAIRS 180.00 0.00 /__/__ • RADIOS RADIO SHACK 024459 FUSE & PHONE CASE 33.18 0.00 . /--/-- REPRO REPROGRAPHICS OF NEW ENGLAND I 70356 ENVELOPES & LETTERHEAD 232.26 0.00 REPRO REPROGRAPHICS OF NEW ENGLAND I 70431 RETURN ENVELOPES 115.14 0.00 RODDL RODD, LINDA 01202013 3/17/13 PROGRAM 200.00 0.00 . /--/-- RSVP RSVP 01/13 ANNUAL, CONTRIBUTION 1700.00 0.00 . /__/__ RYDERK RYDER, KAREN BCA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 24.50 0.00 /__/__ BASIL SABIL & SONS INC 65631 STOLEN CAR TOWING 340.00 0.00 SANEL SANEL AUTO PARTS INC 13QS9963 BULB SOCKET 15.74 0.00 SANEL SANEL AUTO PARTS INC 13QM1847 BALANCE OWED 3.65 0.00 SBCOLLINS SBCOLLINS, INC 213401 DIESEL & UNLEADED FUEL 28789.38 0.00 SCOTCHB SCOTCH, BENSON 01072013 MARCH 13 PRESENTATION 75.00 0.00 SECU SECURSHRED 135976 CITY HALL SHREDDING 22.50 0.00 SEWLY SEWLY TAILORING 0001 CLEANING BILL FOR 2012 1575.80 0.00 SHARPEB SHARPE, BROOKE 55206 ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR 230.00 0.00 SHARPED SHARPE, DONNA 55206-1 ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR 230.00 0.00 . /__/__ SHAW SHAW, CHRISTOPHER 8CA02012013 RCA THRU 2/1/13 40.00 0.00 . /__/__ SIG SIGN A RAMA 27014 REPAIR AFRAME TRACKING 225.00 0.00 SKIFFR SKIFF, ROBERT 8CA02012013 BCA THRU 2/1/13 7.00 0.00 /-_/__ SLACK SLACK CHEMICAL COMPANY INC 260771 HYDRATED LIME 772.50 0.00 . /__/__ SOSDIS SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRI P02870 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 1333.61 0.00 °OTWAT SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTM 1278JL/612 WATER/STORMWATER 566.38 0.00 • /__/_- r<'WAT SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTM 12700CT/DE12 WATER/STORMWATER 541.64 0.00 . /__/__ SOTWAT SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTM 7660J/S12 STORMWATER 93.18 0.00 . - /__/__ 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 6 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct l(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check R Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date SOTWAT SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTM 76600/D12 STORMWATER 89.10 0.00 . /--/-- SOUFAM SOUTH BURLINGTON FAMILY CENTER 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 5500.00 0.00 . /--/-- SPEAR SPEAR STREET MOWER SPECIALTIES 5298 FUSE 19.91 0.00 . /--/-- STA STATE OF VERMONT FY13-TIF-07- TIF APP-SERVICES FROM EP 14565.60 0.00 . /--/-- STA STATE OF VERMONT 3351.-9010 STMWTR GREGORY IND. PARK 80.00 0.00 . /--/-- STANTEC STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 655245 OAK CREEK/BUTLER FKA#273 678.00 0.00 . /--/-- STANTEC STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 641369 STP 5200(18) 267.80 0.00 . /--/-- STANTEC STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES IN 624923 STP 5200(18) 7481.06 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024233679 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 73.59 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024233676 MISC. SUPPLIES 151.75 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024311463 INK CARTRIDGES 77.97 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024311462 MICROSOFT ONE NOTE 79.99 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024233673 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 207.71 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024311461 RETURN - BINDER -17.99 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024233677 ENVELOPES & SUPPLIES 72.41 0.00 . /--/-- STAPL STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 8024233675 2 RECORDERS & MISC. SUPP 747.26 0.00 . /--/-- STARKEY STARKEY, LAUREN B 55241-2 SAT BOOTCAMP 1095.00 0.00 . /--/-- STITZ STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. 22249 NOVEMBER 2012 20125.75 0.00 . /--/-- STONE STONE ENVIRONMENTAL INC 7810 FKA FUND 273; PROJ 12-07 688.16 0.00 . /--/-- SUPERCT SUPERIOR COURT OF VERMONT 01292013 NOTARY PUBLIC APP 30.00 0.00 . /--/-- SUPERIORA SUPERIOR AUTO BODY 113080 AUTO BODY REPAIRS 1474.75 0.00 . /--/-- SYSTEMS SYSTEMS EAST INC 121219 BB&T MONTHYLY STATEMENT 32.95 0.00 . /--/-- TAILHOOK TAILHOOK TOWING, LLC 4044 FLATBED TOW 142.50 0.00 TAYLOR TAYLOR, PETER BCA02012013 RCA THRU 2/1/13 96.00 0.00 . , -/-- TECHGROUP TECH GROUP 60127 COMPUTER POWER SUPPLIES 130.00 0.00 . /--/-- TIFCO TIFCO INDUSTRIES INC 70826228 PLOW BOLTS 507.86 0.00 . /--/-- TUDORP TUDOR, CHRIS 01302013 REIMBURSE - MAILBOX 72.82 0.00 /--/-- TWINST CED - TWIN STATE 8124-748283 SHOP LIGHTS 108.36 0.00 . /--/-- TWINST CED - TWIN STATE 8124-745245 GRAPHIC KEYPAD 105.80 0.00 . /--/-- UNIFIRST UNIFIRST CORPORATION 036 1528176 MAT CLEANING 72.30 0.00 . /--/-- VCJTC VCJTC - VERMONT CRIMINAL JUSTI 13019158 NCIC - 3 ATTENDED 54.00 0.00 . /--/-- VER IZON VERIZON WIRELESS 2857899366 I-PAD WIRELESS SERVICE 351.25 0.00 /--/-- VER IZON VERIZON WIRELESS 2859299534 CELL PHONE - JUSTIN 78.90 0.00 . /--/-- VER IZON VERIZON WIRELESS 2859956788 REC PHONES 148.47 0.00 /--/-- VER IZON VERIZON WIRELESS 2859949375 PD - PHONES 1172.33 0.00 . /--/-- VERASB VERMONT ASSOCIATION FOR THE BL 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 200.00 0.00 . /--/-- VERGAS VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS INC 190008-3J13 LANDFILL RD. - OFFICE 2116.94 0.00 . /--/-- VERGAS VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS INC 190006-7J13 208 LANDFILL - GARAGE 2098.62 0.00 . /--/-- VERMIND VERMONT CTR. FOR INDEPENDENT L 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 200.00 0.00 /--/-- VERPET VERMONT PET FOOD & SUPPLY 3-043960 DOG FOOD 49.61 0.00 . /--/-- VERST VERMONT STATE TREASURER 10011231D12 MARRIAGE LICENSES 630.00 0.00 . /--/-- VERTIR VERMONT TIRE & SERVICE INC 144992 FLAT TIRE REPAIR 15.00 0.00 . /--/-- VERTIR VERMONT TIRE & SERVICE INC 145249 TUBES 10.44 0.00 . /--/-- VHB VANAS VHB - VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN 0157618 MARKET ST. PROJ #51658.0 3949.73 0.00 . /--/-- VHB VANAS VHB - VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN 0158678 KENNEDY DR POND- 57406.0 265.28 0.00 . /--/-- VIKING VIKING-CIVES (USA) 4450662 WIPER BLADES 45.00 0.00 . /--/-- VIKING VIKING-LIVES (USA) 4450458 PUISHPLUG SWIVEL 56.00 0.00 . /--/-- VIKING VIKING-CIVES (USA) 4450765 ELBOW 42.00 0.00 . I-- VISIT VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 7900.00 0.00 VMCTA VMCTA GOLD2013 GOLD MEMBER DONATION 50.00 0.00 . /--/-- 02/01/13 City of South Burlington Accounts Payable Page 7 09:09 am Check Warrant Report # cingalls Unpaid Invoices For Check Acct 1(GENERAL FUND) From / / To 02/04/13 Purchase Discount Amount Check Check Vendor Invoice Invoice Description Amount Amount Paid Number Date 'W B MASON W B MASON CO INC 109319498 COPIER PAPER 59.98 0.00 . /--/-- W L CONST W L CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 600 COMBO DIAMOND BLADE 299.99 0.00 . /__/__ WATERENV WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION CROSBY/S 13 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 77.00 0.00 . /__/__ WILLIAMST WILLIAMS, TAMMY 01292013 OVERPAID PET LICENSE 9.00 0.00 WINDWLD WINDSHIELD WORLD 600788 REPLACED WINDSHIELD 275.00 0.00 WOLFE WOLFE, JULIE 01172013 2/10/13 PROGRAM 150.00 0.00 . /__/__ WOMEN WOMEN HELPING BATTERED WOMEN 01/13 ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION 3500.00 0.00 . /__/__ Report Total 259,588.95 21.34 0.00 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL To the Treasurer of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, We Hereby certify that there is due to the several persons whose names are listed hereon the sum against each name and that there are good and sufficient vouchers supporting the payments aggregating $ ***259,567.61 Let this be your order for the payments of these amounts. Rosanne Greco Sandra Dooley Paul Engels Helen Riehle Pam Mackenzie From: Bob Rusten, Deputy City Manager To: City Council Subjects: Analysis of FY 2013 December Unaudited Financials Date: January 31,2012 City wide expenses as an aggregate are still trending a little higher than last year same period but are at 49%attainment which is on track at the mid-year mark of the fiscal year. We're tracking very closely to our percent attainment at same time last year,taking into consideration that we paid off the full loan amount for the fire truck(that over-budgeted amount is balanced by revenue received) and incurred some non-budgeted reimbursable expenses in the areas of Planning& Zoning and Fire. Total General Fund revenues are 63.73%FY 2013 vs. 63.67%FY 2012. However,three areas of revenue concern are: Vermont District Court, Ambulance Service Billing, and Fire Inspection Revenue. The Police Chief has addressed the Court fees below. We hope to have on the 2/19/13 Council agenda for first reading the Fire Protection Ordinance, required for us to collect these fees. Ambulance billing has already been discussed with Council. We are initiating going to a cash-received vs. accounts-billed approach which may help this budget line for this year. As Council is aware with the approved expenditures for which money had not been budgeted there is no flexibility within the General Fund budget. We monitor expenses and revenues on at least a weekly basis and have informed staff that no expenditures are to be made that will put their budget line over without first seeking approval from the Deputy City Manager. Please find comments below from Department Heads that have responded to our monthly query and as reviewed by Finance. City Clerk Election Expenses will be considerably over budget for the year mostly due to the Board of Civil Authority requesting that the new voting districts be posted twice in the Other Paper which cost about$2,000 which was unbudgeted. Also some school expenses for the election will be reclassified to the School Election Expense line. BCA Appeals/Abatements will be considerably over budget due to the unexpected event of the City of Burlington appealing 124 properties of the City of Burlington and the International Airport. Public Safety Police—Income -Vermont District Court(traffic fines) is tracking well below projections. This is attributed to staff shortage and training demands due to hiring new officers. Internal work assignments are being addressed to increase traffic enforcement for the second half of the year. It is likely that this line will end the year below projections. It is expected that this revenue shortfall will be offset by savings in the salary line. Expenses- A bulk of required range supplies were purchased early in the year with ample funding for any supplies that may be needed for the final six months. The uniform supplies line has seen front loaded expenses due to the hiring and need to outfit new officers. All xpenditures for conferences have been made for the year. Overage ($267.68) in this line will be offset by under expenditure in other areas of the budget. All expenditures have been made from the Taser Replacement line. Due to price increase the line is overspent by $53.25. This will be offset by under expenditure in other areas of the budget. 1 Public Works, Stormwater and Sewer 1. Highway: a. Expenses: i. Sign Supplies—83.36%. We had an unusually high number of sign knockdowns due to motor vehicle single car accidents. Some of that money was recouped through insurance if the incident was accompanied by a Police Report and was taken in as a Highway Misc. Revenue. ii. Vehicle Repair Parts—81.12%. Winter maintenance takes a heavy toll on our equipment, and with the big storms to date we have incurred more repairs than normal. If winter slows down we should be able to bring this item at or near budget. iii. Oil— 136.36%. This is a joint expense shared with the School Department that we receive revenue for form them. In the future this item needs to be increased to reflect our actuals. iv. Tree Care—86.78%. As you recall, we had a large wind storm the first week of the FY that resulted in large expenses. Knowing that,we have limited spending on this line going forward. b. Revenue: i. Road Opening Permits—27.15%. This is a function of the economy and how much new construction as well as how many planned or emergency repairs the local utility companies are making. Our receivables clearly indicate a slow down in either or both of these factors. c. Overall: To date, Highway is 40%budget expended and has received 67% of the budgeted revenues. 2. Stormwater: a. Expenses: i. Small Equipment/Tools—73.70%. This item will be monitored to ensure it comes in on budget. ii. Permit Required, Education— 116.13%. We had a few website improvements we had to make to comply with our MS4 permit.No additional expenses are planned on this item this FY. iii. Vehicle Maintenance—95.80%. Stormwater needed major repairs to one of its vehicles early in the FY.Normally this budget is for routine maintenance,but this time we were hit with a larger than expected issue. b. Revenues: i. State of Vermont Fee for Services—0%. We will be performing and billing the State for this work in the spring. ii. Land Owner Payments—0%. We will be completing a project this spring that will allow us to charge the private land owners their share of the project. c. Overall: To date, Stormwater is 35%budget expended and has received 40%of the budgeted revenues. 3. Sewer: a. Expenses: i. Chemical. In general,most chemical line items are at higher than budgeted levels. This trend will continue until we have a better handle on the operations of the new APWWTF. 2 ii. Lab Supplies— 101.49%. Some older(circa 1980s) equipment broke and we had to replace it.No additional major expenses are expected this FY. iii. Telephone/Alarms—72.02%. A few pump stations had the SCADA (remote communication) systems fail and we had to replace them. Going forward we expect to bring this line in at or near budget. iv. Soil/Sludge Management— 16.76%. This item is low due to the success of the new APWWTF's Class A sludge production. Over time the goal is to see even more reduced expenses as our Class A system continues to improve. v. Landfill Fees—23.54%. Same as (iv) above. vi. Engineering/Consulting—213.60%. The Council had previously approved a project at Bartlett Bay to repair the Disc Filter Cloth system and included in those costs were increased engineering expenses. b. Revenues: i. W.P.C. Truck Charges—2.63%. This is our sludge receiving system in which private haulers dump sludge at AP that we then treat for a fee. With the new Class A system we are slowly working in external waste streams, including Bartlett Bay biosolids, so as not to upset the chemical Class A process. We are intentionally being conservative on how much external waste we accept until we are comfortable with our Class A product. As you see from the expense side,while this conservative approach may be costing us a little extra revenue, it has resulted in significant reduced expenses. ii. Environmental Impact—0%. This is for special circumstance waste (other than the sludge mentioned above)that we receive and treat from others. We expect to receive a large load from Magic Hat soon. c. Overall: To date, Sewer is 49%budget expended and has received 55%of the budgeted revenues. Culture and Recreation Leave Time Turn In and Nontaxable Fringe Benefits will been reclassified from the Permanent Salaries account in the January financials. This adjustment will also reduce the Recreation Administrative Salary line. While Youth Programs are overspent,the revenue figure for this account offsets any increased spending, and actually produces additional income. It is indicative that we are providing additional programs that generate both revenue and expenses. A major contributor to this is the Student Driver Education Classes that are being offered. Planning and Zoning All revenue categories remain at or slightly ahead of budget projections. The City received a reimbursement in the amount of$43,600 for the Condominium Energy Efficiency Grant that shows up under Natural Resources/Energy in the expenditures report. The balance will be paid from Energy/Planning Consulting. The mapping and consulting lines have been partially encumbered with staff awaiting bills for work in first portion of the year. Other lines are as expected for this point in the year, with dues principally having been paid for the year,training forthcoming in the spring. 3 Expenditure Report-December,2012 General Fund %Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Budget Expenditures Expended $(+/-) Paid December GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. CITY COUNCIL General Expenses $1,000.00 $1,024.25 102.43% ($24.25) $176.30 Holmes Road $0.00 $4,251.51 100.00% ($4,251.51) $0.00 Interim Zoning $0.00 $4,839.01 100.00% ($4,839.01) $4,712.21 G.B.I.C. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 V.L.C.T. $18,735.00 $18,735.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Chamber of Commerce $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 Social Services $36,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $36,000.00 $0.00 CCTV-Clickable Meetings $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Councilors $5,480.00 $5,480.00 100.00% $0.00 $5,480.00 Liquor Control $300.00 $300.00 100.00% $0.00 $300.00 Front Page Forum $3,960.00 $3,960.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 USA Triathlon $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total CITY COUNCIL $84,475.00 $53,589.77 63.44% $30,885.23 $10,668.51 ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE Payment to Sickbank Fund $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $25,000.00 $0.00 Employee(s)Payout $17,120.00 $0.00 0.00% $17,120.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $9,100.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,100.00 $0.00 Vision Plan $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Vision Plan Sick Bank $124.00 $0.00 0.00% $124.00 $0.00 Short Term Disability Pla $4,716.00 $2,090.70 44.33% $2,625.30 $348.45 Long Term Disability $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,000.00 $0.00 Group Health Insurance $212,000.00 $94,715.68 44.68% $117,284.32 $14,789.37 Health Sick Bank $38,750.00 $26,071.71 67.28% $12,678.29 $4,349.51 Group Life Insurance $5,000.00 $4,232.82 84.66% $767.18 $705.47 Group Dental Insurance $19,750.00 $9,668.98 48.96% $10,081.02 $1,659.20 Dental Sick Bank $7,235.00 $1,872.18 25.88% $5,362.82 $333.25 Pension $173,850.00 $11,113.78 6.39% $162,736.22 $0.00 ICMA Match $21,500.00 $13,582.28 63.17% $7,917.72 ($17,115.18) Workers Comp Insurance $29,538.00 ($7,211.95) -24.42% $36,749.95 ($3,669.25) Property Insurance $27,425.00 $23,156.49 84.44% $4,268.51 $10,994.37 VLCT Unemployment Insuran $15,000.00 $10,687.10 71.25% $4,312.90 $3,752.36 Deductibles/Coinsurance $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 COBRA $20,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,200.00 $0.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $643,808.00 $199,979.77 31.06% $443,828.23 $16,147.55 CITY MANAGER City Mgr.Salaries-Perm. $360,800.00 $204,195.97 56.60% $156,604.03 $34,934.98 City Mgr.Salaries-Other $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,500.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $11,400.00 $6,326.88 55.50% $5,073.12 $6,326.88 FICA/Medicare $27,792.00 $14,283.60 51.39% $13,508.40 $2,158.23 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Office Supplies $2,500.00 $1,387.10 55.48% $1,112.90 $150.95 Advertising $7,500.00 $2,273.74 30.32% $5,226.26 $279.20 Telephone $2,704.00 $1,928.79 71.33% $775.21 $238.21 Postage $3,500.00 $410.01 11.71% $3,089.99 $380.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,000.00 $2,348.00 117.40% ($348.00) $1,794.00 Printing $8,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,000.00 $0.00 Consulting Fees $2,000.00 $145.00 7.25% $1,855.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $8,000.00 $3,645.69 45.57% $4,354.31 $155.00 Total CITY MANAGER $438,696.00 $237,244.78 54.08% $201,451.22 $46,417.45 Legal,Accouting,Actuary Hiring-required testing $1,000.00 $322.00 32.20% $678.00 $161.00 Payroll Processing Fees $10,500.00 $4,597.55 43.79% $5,902.45 $769.48 Planning and Design Litig $35,000.00 $36,206.60 103.45% ($1,206.60) $12,434.01 Appeals/Abatements $7,500.00 $7,622.13 101.63% ($122.13) $4,069.88 Gen Govt.Actuaries/Pensi $86,000.00 $35,067.46 40.78% $50,932.54 $19,586.62 Legal Retainer $42,000.00 $10,922.50 26.01% $31,077.50 $7,000.00 Gen Govt.Audit/Accountin $25,000.00 $17,800.00 71.20% $7,200.00 $800.00 Background Checks $4,500.00 $330.00 7.33% $4,170.00 $120.00 Legal/Labor/Suits $60,000.00 $25,221.86 42.04% $34,778.14 $19,651.82 Total Legal,Accouting,Actuary $271,500.00 $138,090.10 50.86% $133,409.90 $64,592.81 Administrative Services Muni Bld Cleaning Supplie $1,750.00 $562.50 32.14% $1,187.50 $214.37 Natural Gas Car-Parts $100.00 $217.36 217.36% ($117.36) $0.00 2nd Floor Copier $5,000.00 $2,611.80 52.24% $2,388.20 $730.41 Muni Bld Cleaning Service $15,000.00 $7,219.30 48.13% $7,780.70 $2,406.75 City Hall Maintenance $35,000.00 $3,651.36 10.43% $31,348.64 $253.97 Contingency Fund-Infrastr $278,875.00 $39,282.98 14.09% $239,592.02 $8,562.50 Computer Services $60,000.00 $22,170.87 36.95% $37,829.13 $7,626.25 Computer Software/Hardwar $48,934.00 $17,304.42 35.36% $31,629.58 ($1,687.50) Electricity-City Hall $43,000.00 $14,655.22 34.08% $28,344.78 $2,547.50 Heating/Cooling-City Hall $21,000.00 $2,179.61 10.38% $18,820.39 $1,018.49 Street Lights $163,350.00 $87,111.82 53.33% $76,238.18 $15,737.61 Sewer User Rent $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,500.00 $0.00 Stormwater User Rent $280,000.00 $71,983.89 25.71% $208,016.11 $5,274.72 Urban Art Project Park $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,500.00 $0.00 Health Officer Reimbursem $100.00 $0.00 0.00% $100.00 $0.00 Emergency Mgmt Center $11,000.00 $978.59 8.90% $10,021.41 $147.00 Generator Prevent Maint. $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 Othophotographs/Impact Fe $27,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $27,500.00 $0.00 Council/Board Secretary $8,075.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,075.00 $0.00 Possible Additional Staff $30,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $30,000.00 $0.00 PD 3rd Floor Lease $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,000.00 $0.00 Comm.Member Conf.Reg. $0.00 $165.00 100.00% ($165.00) $0.00 Total Administrative Services $1,040,284.00 $270,094.72 25.96% $770,189.28 $42.832.07 CITY CLERK City Clerk Salaries-Penn. $150,245.00 $87,669.82 58.35% $62,575.18 $13,973.52 Leave Time Turn-In $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Overtime $1,000.00 $1,429.58 142.96% ($429.58) $85.61 Fringe Benefits $750.00 $0.00 0.00% $750.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $11,571.00 $7,078.78 61.18% $4,492.22 $1,105.56 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 General Supplies $2,400.00 $1,067.25 44.47% $1,332.75 $305.57 Animal Control $9,600.00 $927.73 9.66% $8,672.27 $0.00 Election Expenses $6,050.00 $6,070.81 100.34% ($20.81) $0.00 School Election Expenses $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 Telephone $1,622.00 $475.91 29.34% $1,146.09 $56.53 Postage $5,200.00 $4.64 0.09% $5,195.36 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $275.00 $210.00 76.36% $65.00 $75.00 Printing $355.00 $195.69 55.12% $159.31 $0.00 Board of Civil Authority $3,596.00 $2,544.65 70.76% $1,051.35 $2,437.75 Election Workers $6,200.00 $1,811.00 29.21% $4,389.00 $0.00 BCA Appeals/Abatements $854.00 $1,919.35 224.75% ($1,065.35) $920.00 Office Equip Maintenance $4,050.00 $803.44 19.84% $3,246.56 $0.00 Travel&Training $3,500.00 $1,786.29 51.04% $1,713.71 $562.65 Photocopier Lease Prin $1,805.00 $688.23 38.13% $1,116.77 $242.86 Total CITY CLERK $214,573.00 $114,983.17 53.59% $99,589.83 $19,765.05 GENERAL LEDGER/PAYROLL G.L./Pyrl.Salaries-Perm. $62,200.00 $29,280.00 47.07% $32,920.00 $4,684.80 FICA/Medicare $4,758.00 $2,140.38 44.98% $2,617.62 $343.14 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Office Supplies $655.00 $183.71 28.05% $471.29 $0.00 Telephone $541.00 $287.41 53.13% $253.59 $18.86 Postage $2,305.00 $5.74 0.25% $2,299.26 $0.00 Dues&Memberships $250.00 $190.00 76.00% $60.00 $0.00 Printing $425.00 $493.96 116.23% ($68.96) $0.00 Equipment Contracts $480.00 $105.44 21.97% $374.56 $0.00 Travel&Training $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Total GENERAL LEDGER/PAYROLL $72,114.00 $32,986.64 45.74% $39,127.36 $5,046.80 ASSESSING/TAX Assessing/Tax Sal.-Perm. $105,100.00 $50,510.06 48.06% $54,589.94 $8,081.60 Overtime $500.00 $142.11 28.42% $357.89 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $8,078.00 $4,247.21 52.58% $3,830.79 $677.80 Office Supplies $600.00 $418.23 69.71% $181.77 $0.00 Tax Sales Advertising $350.00 $0.00 0.00% $350.00 $0.00 Telephone $1,081.00 $381.58 35.30% $699.42 $37.68 Postage $4,800.00 $2,644.69 55.10% $2,155.31 $0.00 Dues and Memberships $600.00 $25.00 4.17% $575.00 $0.00 Printing $1,300.00 $940.63 72.36% $359.37 $0.00 Equipment Maintenance $500.00 $106.85 21.37% $393.15 $0.27 NEMRC/APEX $1,300.00 $882.00 67.85% $418.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $500.00 $966.98 193.40% ($466.98) $0.00 Total ASSESSING/TAX $124,709.00 $61,265.34 49.13% $63,443.66 $8,797.35 PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW Planning Salaries-Perm. $192,500.00 $89,361.32 46.42% $103,138.68 $14,675.21 Planning Salaries-Other $0.00 $6,225.00 100.00% ($6,225.00) $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Overtime $4,500.00 $3,148.45 69.97% $1,351.55 $612.95 Fringe Benefits $750.00 $0.00 0.00% $750.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $15,071.00 $7,130.78 47.31% $7,940.22 $1,113.93 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Office Supplies $4,000.00 $1,019.18 25.48% $2,980.82 $121.85 Public Meeting Advertisin $3,500.00 $706.66 20.19% $2,793.34 $194.68 Telephone $1,622.00 $379.32 23.39% $1,242.68 $56.53 Postage $1,500.00 ($346.76) -23.12% $1,846.76 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,200.00 $943.00 78.58% $257.00 $150.00 Document Printing $2,000.00 $5.58 0.28% $1,994.42 $5.58 Maps $5,000.00 $357.50 7.15% $4,642.50 $0.00 Consultants $20,000.00 $228.65 1.14% $19,771.35 $0.00 PC/DRB Stipends $9,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,000.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $4,500.00 $229.71 5.10% $4,270.29 $167.72 Legal Permit Review $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Independent Technical Rev $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Reimbursable grant expend $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $296,143.00 $109,688.39 37.04% $186,454.61 $17,098.45 NATURAL RESOURCES Dues and Subscriptions $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 Educational Programs $200.00 $46,400.00 23200.00% ($46,200.00) $0.00 Special Projects Material $1,700.00 $387.00 22.76% $1,313.00 $0.00 Printing $100.00 $0.00 0.00% $100.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $200.00 $0.00 0.00% $200.00 $0.00 Total NATURAL RESOURCES $2,900.00 $46,787.00 1613.34% ($43,887.00) $0.00 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT Ambulance Department $155,000.00 $155,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Fuel Pump Reserve Fund $8,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,200.00 $0.00 Open Space Reserve Fund $277,750.00 $277,750.00 100.00% $0.00 $277,750.00 Reappraisal Fund $70,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $70,500.00 $0.00 To undesignated reserve f $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $50,000.00 $0.00 To Capital Improvements $190,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $190,000.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $751,450.00 $432,750.00 57.59% $318,700.00 $277,750.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. $3,940,652.00 $1,697,459.68 43.08% $2,243,192.32 $509,116.04 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Salaries-Permanent $1,054,500.00 $538,682.13 51.08% $515,817.87 $62,487.43 Fire Salaries-Other $18,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $18,000.00 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $8,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,000.00 $0.00 Holiday Pay $119,000.00 $76,894.25 64.62% $42,105.75 $0.00 Fair Labor Standard OR' $77,000.00 $19,786.53 25.70% $57,213.47 ($32,975.58) F/D Overtime-Fill-In $90,000.00 $79,033.04 87.81% $10,966.96 $36,029.63 F/D Overtime-Training $18,000.00 $16,739.71 93.00% $1,260.29 $2,062.12 F/D Overtime-Emerg Call $21,000.00 $4,637.96 22.09% $16,362.04 $395.01 Weliness/Fitness $9,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,500.00 $0.00 Fire-Off Duty Outside Emp $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,000.00 $0.00 Administrative Assistance $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,500.00 $0.00 Payment to Sick Bank Fund $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Fire Inspector $100,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $100,000.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $96,583.00 $60,668.16 62.81% $35,914.84 $8,781.92 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Vision Plan $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Disability $560.00 $0.00 0.00% $560.00 $0.00 Group Health Insurance $202,100.00 $88,904.11 43.99% $113,195.89 $13,142.35 Group Life Insurance $2,425.00 $1,266.38 52.22% $1,158.62 $196.75 Group Dental Insurance $17,300.00 $7,704.50 44.53% $9,595.50 $1,292.03 Pension $82,815.00 $0.00 0.00% $82,815.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $1,500.00 $1,319.31 87.95% $180.69 $419.18 Vaccinations-HEP $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 REHAB Supplies $300.00 $19.74 6.58% $280.26 $0.00 Station Operating Supply $4,500.00 $1,164.92 25.89% $3,335.08 $244.06 Maintenance Tools $420.00 $0.00 0.00% $420.00 $0.00 Uniforms-Career $5,650.00 $5,676.79 100.47% ($26.79) $0.00 Uniforms-Call $5,500.00 $3,940.76 71.65% $1,559.24 $3,940.76 Firefighting Clothing $5,000.00 $1,586.06 31.72% $3,413.94 $1,432.25 Vehicle Tools $1,000.00 $280.07 28.01% $719.93 $0.00 Gas Chiefs vehicle&rei $1,400.00 $276.83 19.77% $1,123.17 $276.83 Diesel Fuel $28,000.00 $12,987.17 46.38% $15,012.83 $2,309.94 Oil $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 Films and Books $1,100.00 $578.20 52.56% $521.80 $0.00 Fire Prevention Materials $3,500.00 $1,469.26 41.98% $2,030.74 $0.00 Fire Extinguishers $300.00 $20.00 6.67% $280.00 $0.00 Airpacks Maintenance $8,000.00 $3,084.35 38.55% $4,915.65 $77.00 Telephone $15,680.00 $5,544.67 35.36% $10,135.33 $1,285.46 Postage-Tool Shipping $400.00 $183.58 45.90% $216.42 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,500.00 $703.32 46.89% $796.68 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $136,563.00 $124,080.60 90.86% $12,482.40 $46,927.16 Property Insurance $31,533.00 $25,358.85 80.42% $6,174.15 $10,343.33 Fire Station Maintenance $14,000.00 $7,678.07 54.84% $6,321.93 $1,286.81 Laundry and Bedding $900.00 $75.00 8.33% $825.00 $0.00 Radio Repair $1,500.00 $725.50 48.37% $774.50 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $8,500.00 $2,204.56 25.94% $6,295.44 $40.39 Vehicle Repair $10,000.00 $9,588.19 95.88% $411.81 $1,195.86 Equipment R&M $4,000.00 $1,677.35 41.93% $2,322.65 $728.20 Computers Contract ACS $2,000.00 $1,639.38 81.97% $360.62 $56.85 Conferences $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Training Schools $4,000.00 $1,235.73 30.89% $2,764.27 $0.00 Training Equipment $750.00 $0.00 0.00% $750.00 $0.00 Recruiting&Testing $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Fire Station#2 Heat/Elec $11,000.00 $4,590.54 41.73% $6,409.46 $593.44 Fire Safety Equipment $110,480.00 $47,113.84 42.64% $63,366.16 $0.00 F/D Fumiture/Equipment $4,000.00 $1,581.75 39.54% $2,418.25 $0.00 Inspector Car/Equipment $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $25,000.00 $0.00 Firefighting Equipment-ho $10,000.00 $2,241.78 22.42% $7,758.22 $0.00 Equipment Notes Prin $174,285.00 $174,198.52 99.95% $86.48 $0.00 Note on Quint Fire Truck $160,955.00 $602,545.71 374.36% ($441,590.71) $0.00 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $2,742,099.00 $1,939,987.17 70.75% $802,111.83 $162,569.18 AMBULANCE Permanent Salaries $401,700.00 $181,842.93 45.27% $219,857.07 $41,373.63 EMT Pay $58,600.00 $32,295.29 55.11% $26,304.71 $32,295.29 Holiday Pay $65,300.00 $16,885.81 25.86% $48,414.19 $0.00 Fair Labor Standard OT $24,000.00 $16,856.08 70.23% $7,143.92 $3,538.24 Overtime Fill-In $20,000.00 $27,349.54 136.75% ($7,349.54) $15,729.16 Overtime-Training $9,900.00 $2,368.31 23.92% $7,531.69 $900.14 Overtime-Emergency Call $7,500.00 $1,105.29 14.74% $6,394.71 $172.42 Payment to Sick Bank Fund $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,000.00 $0.00 Wellness $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 FICA/MEDI $40,468.00 $18,192.97 44.96% $22,275.03 $3,833.40 Group Health Insurance $77,000.00 $30,614.60 39.76% $46,385.40 $5,736.77 Group Life Insurance $800.00 $429.40 53.68% $370.60 $85.88 Group Dental Insurance $6,600.00 $5,464.36 82.79% $1,135.64 $1,082.23 Pension $31,550.00 $0.00 0.00% $31,550.00 $0.00 ICMA Match $1,900.00 $1,004.52 52.87% $895.48 $1,004.52 Doctor Service Stipend $2,400.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,400.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $477.97 23.90% $1,522.03 $0.00 Medical Supplies-Disposab $17,000.00 $18,143.66 106.73% ($1,143.66) $2,441.17 Medical Supplies-Oxygen $4,000.00 $1,447.42 36.19% $2,552.58 $357.63 Medical Equipment Replace $3,000.00 $4,239.58 141.32% ($1,239.58) $1,059.64 Uniforms-Career $6,000.00 $2,811.59 46.86% $3,188.41 $1,565.65 Diesel Fuel $7,500.00 $3,520.24 46.94% $3,979.76 $589.87 Training Films and Books $750.00 $0.00 0.00% $750.00 $0.00 Telephone $2,278.00 $681.62 29.92% $1,596.38 $216.47 Billing Postage $3,000.00 $5.74 0.19% $2,994.26 $0.00 Dues&Subscriptions $500.00 $120.00 24.00% $380.00 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $34,968.00 $30,689.35 87.76% $4,278.65 $11,602.37 Property Insurance $7,267.00 $5,739.90 78.99% $1,527.10 $2,279.48 Contingency-Equipment Rep $10,000.00 $2,636.13 26.36% $7,363.87 $146.80 Radio Repair $1,500.00 $315.00 21.00% $1,185.00 $249.00 Vehicle Maintenance $2,500.00 $649.59 25.98% $1,850.41 $0.00 Vehicle Repair $5,000.00 $1,226.29 24.53% $3,773.71 $679.67 Equipment R&M $1,250.00 $225.97 18.08% $1,024.03 $0.00 Billing Software/Upgrades $8,278.00 $2,428.15 29.33% $5,849.85 $0.00 Med Equipment Maintenance $1,000.00 $884.25 88.43% $115.75 $401.25 Training Programs $2,000.00 $1,155.55 57.78% $844.45 $274.35 Training Equipment $500.00 $25.00 5.00% $475.00 $25.00 To Reserve Fund-Training $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Radios Purchase $6,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,200.00 $0.00 EMS Patient Care Discript $37,250.00 $45,211.08 121.37% ($7,961.08) $11,000.00 Total AMBULANCE $931,459.00 $457,043.18 49.07% $474,415.82 $138,640.03 POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Salaries-Permanent $2,343,000.00 $1,149,091.00 49.04% $1,193,909.00 $176,941.21 Police Salaries-Other $15,000.00 $300.30 2.00% $14,699.70 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $12,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $12,000.00 $0.00 Police Salaries-Overtime $220,000.00 $122,458.07 55.66% $97,541.93 $31,801.00 Holiday Pay $184,900.00 $114,316.92. 61.83% $70,583.08 $0.00 Automatic Corporal $15,750.00 $16,973.94 107.77% ($1,223.94) ($105.30) Shift Differential $38,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $38,500.00 $0.00 Drug Task Force Personnel $39,336.00 $0.00 0.00% $39,336.00 $0.00 Off-Duty Police Salary $28,750.00 $0.00 0.00% $28,750.00 $0.00 Payment to Sickbank Fund $42,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $42,000.00 $0.00 Fitness $27,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $27,000.00 $0.00 Reparative Board Grant Ac $72,803.00 $0.00 0.00% $72,803.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $6,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,500.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $216,430.00 $107,539.15 49.69% $108,890.85 $15,968.27 Vision Plan $5,100.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,100.00 $0.00 Disability Insurance $9,500.00 $3,627.30 38.18% $5,872.70 $604.55 Group Health Insurance $472,500.00 $230,117.61 48.70% $242,382.39 $33,428.52 Group Life Insurance $5,650.00 $2,898.36 51.30% $2,751.64 $483.06 Group Dental Insurance $41,200.00 $23,076.42 56.01% $18,123.58 $4,294.36 Pension $185,650.00 $909.26 0.49% $184,740.74 $0.00 ICMA Match $2,000.00 $905.84 45.29% $1,094.16 $905.84 Office Supplies $10,500.00 $3,705.77 35.29% $6,794.23 $408.85 Range Supplies $10,045.00 $7,794.99 77.60% $2,250.01 $7,794.99 Radio Equipment-Supplies $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Investigative Supplies $8,000.00 $1,356.84 16.96% $6,643.16 $301.96 Youth Services Supplies $6,800.00 $2,878.34 42.33% $3,921.66 $0.00 Traffic Unit Supplies $2,400.00 $360.00 15.00% $2,040.00 $0.00 Emergency Mgmnt Supplies $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 K-9 Supplies $3,000.00 $662.64 22.09% $2,337.36 $181.07 Janitorial Supplies $3,000.00 $546.93 18.23% $2,453.07 $150.76 Uniform Supplies $31,700.00 $23,936.98 75.51% $7,763.02 $3,670.83 Tires $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Gas and Oil $68,000.00 $35,679.09 52.47% $32,320.91 $5,922.87 Telephone $32,548.00 $12,063.35 37.06% $20,484.65 $2,965.46 Postage $2,800.00 $1,276.10 45.58% $1,523.90 $368.54 Dues and Subscriptions $3,164.00 $602.42 19.04% $2,561.58 $246.98 Workers Comp Insurance $120,524.00 $81,099.37 67.29% $39,424.63 $26,793.57 Property Insurance $154,232.00 $124,673.20 80.83% $29,558.80 $51,229.24 Towing Services $1,500.00 $195.00 13.00% $1,305.00 $0.00 Crime Prevention Supplies $5,500.00 $1,086.80 19.76% $4,413.20 $0.00 Building Maintenance $9,000.00 $7,600.44 84.45% $1,399.56 $3,663.04 Uniform Cleaning $14,000.00 $5,255.21 37.54% $8,744.79 $1,051.00 Office Equip.Contract $5,000.00 $2,486.54 49.73% $2,513.46 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 Radio Equip.Maintenance $10,000.00 $900.00 9.00% $9,100.00 $0.00 Vehicle Repair $40,000.00 $22,631.73 56.58% $17,368.27 $97.49 Computer Connections Syst $18,826.00 $638.00 3.39% $18,188.00 $638.00 Equipment Maintenance $2,500.00 $1,249.00 49.96% $1,251.00 $219.00 Records Management System $10,000.00 $2,125.00 21.25% $7,875.00 $0.00 Consulting Services $6,840.00 $2,268.00 33.16% $4,572.00 $567.00 Tower Lease $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Animal Control Contracts $21,000.00 $1,550.00 7.38% $19,450.00 $870.00 Conferences $3,800.00 $4,067.68 107.04% ($267.68) $20.00 In-Service Training $28,380.00 $5,208.45 18.35% $23,171.55 $2,253.81 Recruiting&Testing $2,500.00 $920.50 36.82% $1,579.50 $25.00 Tuition Reimbursement $6,800.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,800.00 $0.00 Electric-Police Dept. $55,000.00 $23,027.80 41.87% $31,972.20 $7,720.95 Heat/Hot Water $9,800.00 $535.13 5.46% $9,264.87 $39.19 Radio Installation Utilit $740.00 $120.47 16.28% $619.53 $24.05 Building Common Area Fees $42,260.00 $25,661.37 60.72% $16,598.63 $0.00 Cleaning/Building Service $33,800.00 $9,207.59 27.24% $24,592.41 $0.00 Vehicles and Equipment $109,500.00 $1,135.95 1.04% $108,364.05 $0.00 Radio Equipment $12,160.00 $0.00 0.00% $12,160.00 $0.00 Taser Replacement $5,469.00 $5,522.25 100.97% ($53.25) $0.00 BYRNE Grant $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $25,000.00 $0.00 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $4,931,657.00 $2,192,243.10 44.45% $2,739,413.90 $381,545.16 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $8,605,215.00 $4,589,273.45 53.33% $4,015,941.55 $682,754.37 STREETS&HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Highway Salaries-Perm. $643,510.00 $294,527.69 45.77% $348,982.31 $47,142.25 Leave Time Turn-In $11,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $11,000.00 $0.00 Highway Salaries-Overtime $35,000.00 $7,267.69 20.76% $27,732.31 $1,644.11 On-Call Pay $18,700.00 $6,500.00 34.76% $12,200.00 $6,500.00 Payment to Sickbank Fund $9,600.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,600.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $1,200.00 $85.25 7.10% $1,114.75 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $53,337.00 $24,154.90 45.29% $29,182.10 $4,235.62 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Vision Plan $1,650.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,650.00 $0.00 Drug/Alcohol/Phys.Testing $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Disability Income $3,560.00 $1,344.66 37.77% $2,215.34 $224.11 Group Health Insurance $188,000.00 $79,076.65 42.06% $108,923.35 $13,068.47 Group Life Insurance $1,775.00 $856.80 48.27% $918.20 $142.80 Group Dental Insurance $13,100.00 $8,033.12 61.32% $5,066.88 $1,537.32 Pension $99,190.00 $1,909.20 1.92% $97,280.80 $0.00 ICMA Match $23,000.00 $7,118.76 30.95% $15,881.24 $7,118.76 Office Supplies $2,200.00 $398.61 18.12% $1,801.39 $0.00 Traffic Light Supplies $25,000.00 $7,672.28 30.69% $17,327.72 $1,010.13 Sign Supplies $5,020.00 $4,184.87 83.36% $835.13 $524.00 City Highways Material $18,200.00 $11,380.77 62.53% $6,819.23 $1,006.64 Road Striping $20,000.00 $6,159.13 30.80% $13,840.87 $1,188.09 Winter Salt $86,000.00 $13,866.02 16.12% $72,133.98 $13,866.02 Winter Sand $1,700.00 $52.64 3.10% $1,647.36 $52.64 Winter Liquid Deicer Addi $14,000.00 $2,971.00 21.22% $11,029.00 $2,971.00 Building Supplies $2,500.00 $646.14 25.85% $1,853.86 $179.95 Uniforms $13,000.00 $7,612.59 58.56% $5,387.41 $1,280.36 Vehicle Repair Parts $82,500.00 $66,927.30 81.12% $15,572.70 $8,498.61 School Bus Parts $32,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $32,500.00 $0.00 Gasoline $18,000.00 $11,622.19 64.57% $6,377.81 $8,172.80 Oil $3,500.00 $4,772.57 136.36% ($1,272.57) ($17.45) Diesel Fuel $55,000.00 $12,803.07 23.28% $42,196.93 $9,892.39 Diesel/GasolineNonCity $130,000.00 $88,172.69 67.83% $41,827.31 $17,074.90 Telephone/Internet $9,733.00 $3,855.58 39.61% $5,877.42 $948.57 Workers Comp Insurance $50,957.00 $35,318.90 69.31% $15,638.10 $11,718.42 Property Insurance $46,351.00 $38,305.95 82.64% $8,045.05 $16,173.87 Building Maintenance $30,000.00 $7,577.95 25.26% $22,422.05 $1,004.35 Generator Prevent Maint $630.00 $0.00 0.00% $630.00 $0.00 Hydrant Maintenance $100.00 $0.00 0.00% $100.00 $0.00 Tree Care $8,000.00 $6,942.48 86.78% $1,057.52 $165.00 Equipment Rental/Purchase $3,500.00 $1,134.07 32.40% $2,365.93 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintnce $5,405.00 $409.88 7.58% $4,995.12 $0.00 Travel&Training $5,405.00 $1,680.62 31.09% $3,724.38 $211.25 Utilities-Garage $16,000.00 $6,913.42 43.21% $9,086.58 $1,203.25 Utilities-Garage Heat $14,000.00 $1,470.89 10.51% $12,529.11 $882.97 Traffic Lights $33,000.00 $17,389.85 52.70% $15,610.15 $1,487.35 Vehicle Replacement $360,000.00 $252,342.16 70.10% $107,657.84 $0.00 Highway Paving $460,950.00 $8,548.78 1.85% $452,401.22 $1,139.50 Curbs and Sidewalks $15,000.00 $1,730.97 11.54% $13,269.03 $1,139.32 Spc Prjcts/C Beautifictn $90,000.00 $1,347.90 1.50% $88,652.10 $0.00 Equipment Notes Prin $69,812.00 $69,803.58 99.99% $8.42 $69,803.58 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,831,085.00 $1,125,189.57 39.74% $1,705,895.43 $253,190.95 Total STREETS&HIGHWAYS $2,831,085.00 $1,125,189.57 39.74% $1,705,895.43 $253,190.95 CULTURE AND RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Rec.Admin.Salaries-Perm. $199,000.00 $99,967.25 50.23% $99,032.75 $15,804.45 Leave Time Turn-In $9,193.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,193.00 $0.00 Taxable Fringe Benefits $6,400.00 $2,853.80 44.59% $3,546.20 $650.51 FICA/Medicare $15,927.00 $7,755.97 48.70% $8,171.03 $1,270.55 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $399.73 100.00% ($399.73) $0.00 Office Supplies $2,900.00 $1,181.56 40.74% $1,718.44 $288.13 Telephone $2,163.00 $425.41 19.67% $1,737.59 $75.39 Postage $800.00 $0.00 0.00% $800.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $625.00 $635.00 101.60% ($10.00) $25.00 Workers Comp Insurance $11,157.00 $7,334.61 65.74% $3,822.39 $2,289.53 Property Insurance $9,738.00 $7,273.42 74.69% $2,464.58 $2,636.46 Scholarships $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Printing $3,600.00 $3,204.00 89.00% $396.00 $0.00 Software/Printer Contract $3,500.00 $3,754.53 107.27% ($254.53) $3,619.05 Travel&Training $1,700.00 $1,436.63 84.51% $263.37 $0.00 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $267,703.00 $136,221.91 50.89% $131.481.09 $26,659.07 PROGRAMS Salaries-Programs $9,900.00 $8,385.60 84.70% $1,514.40 $205.00 FICA/Medicare $757.00 $489.71 64.69% $267.29 $15.69 General Supplies $3,000.00 $2,750.71 91.69% $249.29 $385.72 Advertising $2,200.00 $771.71 35.08% $1,428.29 $0.00 School Wage Reimbursement $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Total PROGRAMS $16.857.00 $12,397.73 73.55% $4,459.27 $606.41 RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Park Salaries $9,800.00 $8,196.89 83.64% $1,603.11 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $750.00 $627.06 83.61% $122.94 $0.00 General Supplies $2,000.00 $1,556.00 77.80% $444.00 $0.00 Printing $400.00 $0.00 0.00% $400.00 $0.00 Utilities $500.00 $114.31 22.86% $385.69 $18.78 Total RED ROCKS PARK $13,450.00 $10,494.26 78.02% $2,955.74 $18.78 FACILITIES Park Salaries $3,900.00 $1,821.50 46.71% $2,078.50 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $298.00 $139.33 46.76% $158.67 $0.00 Supplies $3,500.00 $2,183.49 62.39% $1,316.51 $137.25 Fuel-Gas $2,700.00 $516.07 19.11% $2,183.93 $184.66 Recreation Path Committee $400.00 $34.32 8.58% $365.68 $0.00 Electric-Jaycee Park $1,400.00 $732.82 52.34% $667.18 $177.58 Electric-Dorset Park $3,200.00 $1,119.25 34.98% $2,080.75 $247.54 Electric-Overlook Park $350.00 $153.97 43.99% $196.03 $21.34 Electric-Tennis Courts $600.00 $336.31 56.05% $263.69 $43.97 Facilities Improvements $32,851.00 $32,738.50 99.66% $112.50 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $49,199.00 $39,775.56 80.85% $9,423.44 $812.34 LEISURE ARTS Playground Director $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,600.00 $0.00 Arts&Crafts Instructors $1,000.00 $1,013.00 101.30% ($13.00) $0.00 Adult Programs Supplies/I $2,000.00 $2,266.05 113.30% ($266.05) $0.00 FICA/Medicare $352.00 $345.54 98.16% $6.46 $24.68 Kids Playground Supplies $500.00 $30.07 6.01% $469.93 $0.00 Kids Arts&Crarts Materi $400.00 $0.00 0.00% $400.00 $0.00 Senior Club Contract $3,800.00 $1,430.76 37.65% $2,369.24 $342.47 Reimbursement-Bus Drivers $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Artists-Contracts $400.00 $0.00 0.00% $400.00 $0.00 Chorus Directors $3,600.00 $1,100.00 30.56% $2,500.00 $1,100.00 Total LEISURE ARTS $16,652.00 $6,185.42 37.15% $10,466.58 $1,467.15 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Adult Programs $14,930.00 $12,141.49 81.32% $2,788.51 $2,762.00 FICA/Medicare $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($27.54) Jazzercise of Shelburne $5,100.00 $2,565.00 50.29% $2,535.00 $815.00 Skate lessons-Vt Skate $9,100.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,100.00 $0.00 Special Events $6,500.00 $1,183.00 18.20% $5,317.00 $0.00 Swim Lessons-Sport/Fit Ed $8,800.00 $2,250.00 25.57% $6,550.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $11,200.00 $19,432.62 173.51% ($8,232.62) $2,710.00 Great Escape Tickets $17,000.00 $13,643.00 80.25% $3,357.00 $0.00 Afternoon Skiing-Middle S $4,500.00 $55.00 1.22% $4,445.00 $55.00 Afternoon Skiing-Orchard $6,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,500.00 $0.00 Spec.Activities Salaries $7,000.00 $1,605.00 22.93% $5,395.00 $50.00 FICA/Medicare $536.00 $8.03 1.50% $527.97 $3.82 Supplies $5,000.00 $5,393.53 107.87% ($393.53) $912.95 Telephone $1,330.00 $761.83 57.28% $568.17 $120.38 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $97,496.00 $59,038.50 60.55% $38,457.50 $7,401.61 COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Salaries $264,800.00 $120,026.05 45.33% $144,773.95 $19,287.15 FICA/Medicare $20,257.00 $9,486.94 46.83% $10,770.06 $1,523.57 Group Health Insurance $44,000.00 $13,653.03 31.03% $30,346.97 $2,067.33 Group Dental Insurance $3,605.00 $1,653.80 45.88% $1,951.20 $294.38 Library Supplies $5,074.00 $2,751.29 54.22% $2,322.71 $597.38 Books-Adult $13,686.00 $5,075.89 37.09% $8,610.11 $666.37 Books-Children $7,550.00 $2,340.88 31.01% $5,209.12 $171.55 DVDs/CDs-Adult $4,110.00 $1,887.76 45.93% $2,222.24 $628.83 DVDs/CDs-Children $1,556.00 $224.85 14.45% $1,331.15 $0.00 Program Supplies-Arts/Cra $1,450.00 $115.27 7.95% $1,334.73 $0.00 Blanchette Expenditures $8,500.00 $2,592.99 30.51% $5,907.01 $59.96 Blanchette/Subscriptions- $1,230.00 $1,500.21 121.97% ($270.21) $247.21 Postage $1,500.00 $1,125.27 75.02% $374.73 $15.20 Dues and Subscriptions $290.00 $0.00 0.00% $290.00 $0.00 Online&Print Subscripti $4,336.00 $52.00 1.20% $4,284.00 $0.00 Property Insurance $7,366.00 $5,919.14 80.36% $1,446.86 $2,411.74 School Use $56,287.00 $0.00 0.00% $56,287.00 $0.00 Community Programs $4,365.00 $1,785.95 40.92% $2,579.05 $600.00 Service to Shut-Ins $25.00 $0.00 0.00% $25.00 $0.00 Bookmobile $500.00 $506.27 101.25% ($6.27) $0.00 Computer Operations $1,220.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,220.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $915.00 $290.34 31.73% $624.66 $0.00 Furniture $4,465.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,465.00 $0.00 Computer Improvements $3,000.00 $445.40 14.85% $2,554.60 $0.00 Office Renovations $400.00 $0.00 0.00% $400.00 $0.00 C/L Photocopier Lease Pri $2,760.00 $999.62 36.22% $1,760.38 $327.74 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $463,247.00 $172,432.95 37.22% $290,814.05 $28,898.41 CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE ParkMaint.Salaries-Perm. $148,500.00 $63,682.75 42.88% $84,817.25 $10,644.80 Leave Time Turn-In $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Park Maint.Sal.-Overtime $9,000.00 $1,363.29 15.15% $7,636.71 $100.10 Parks On Call $1,000.00 $975.00 97.50% $25.00 $975.00 Payment to Sickbank Fund $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Taxable Fringe Benefits $0.00 $165.00 100.00% ($165.00) $0.00 FICA/Medicare $12,200.00 $5,089.90 41.72% $7,110.10 $904.17 Vision Plan $425.00 $0.00 0.00% $425.00 $0.00 Disability Income $720.00 $351.48 48.82% $368.52 $58.58 Group Health Insurance $48,100.00 $12,296.71 25.56% $35,803.29 $304.39 Group Life Insurance $420.00 $210.00 50.00% $210.00 $35.00 Group Dental Insurance $3,200.00 $1,250.50 39.08% $1,949.50 $222.59 Pension $24,700.00 $0.00 0.00% $24,700.00 $0.00 ICMA Match $6,150.00 $2,114.14 34.38% $4,035.86 $2,114.14 Park Supplies $16,500.00 $13,193.39 79.96% $3,306.61 $1,180.18 } Cemetery Supplies $300.00 $300.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Recreation Path Supplies $1,500.00 $99.42 6.63% $1,400.58 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $5,503.00 $3,620.16 65.79% $1,882.84 $1,127.68 Property Insurance $4,796.00 $3,582.43 74.70% $1,213.57 $1,298.55 Recreation Path Imprvmnts $7,500.00 $1,460.75 19.48% $6,039.25 $0.00 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $294,514.00 $109,754.92 37.27% $184,759.08 $18,965.18 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,219,118.00 $546,301.25 44.81% $672,816.75 $84,828.95 OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES County Court $123,500.00 $123,488.71 99.99% $11.29 $0.00 Winooski Valley Park $54,000.00 $54,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 C.C.T.A. $397,843.00 $265,228.00 66.67% $132,615.00 $0.00 Regional Planning $18,269.00 $18,270.00 100.01% ($1.00) $0.00 Metropolitan Planning $17,101.00 $17,101.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTI IIES $610,713.00 $478,087.71 78.28% $132,625.29 $0.00 CURRENT PRINCIPAL,BONDS Public Works Facility $98,568.00 $98,568.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Reconstrction $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30% ($68.00) $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30% ($68.00) $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-PRINCIP $262,974.00 $0.00 0.00% $262,974.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $30,090.00 $30,005.00 99.72% $85.00 $0.00 Emergency Center $130,000.00 $130,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Police Headquarters $360,000.00 $360,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Parkland, 1992 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Parkland/Brand Farm $40,000.00 $40,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL,BONDS $1,001,512.00 $738,589.00 73.75% $262,923.00 $0.00 CURRENT INTEREST,BONDS Public Works Facility $45,795.00 $24,166.90 52.77% $21,628.10 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Recnstrction $13,038.00 $6,767.03 51.90% $6,270.97 $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $13,038.00 $6,767.03 51.90% $6,270.97 $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-INTERES $397,974.00 $0.00 0.00% $397,974.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $17,483.00 $9,021.00 51.60% $8,462.00 $0.00 Emergency Center $7,131.00 $4,725.50 66.27% $2,405.50 $0.00 Police Headquarters $263,358.00 $133,200.00 50.58% $130,158.00 $0.00 Parkland,1992 $1,148.00 $349.16 30.41% $798.84 $0.00 Parkland/Brand Farm $3,400.00 $2,266.40 66.66% $1,133.60 $0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST,BONDS $762,365.00 $187,263.02 24.56% $575,101.98 $0.00 Total GENERAL FUND $18,970,660.00 $9,362,163.68 49.35% $9,608,496.32 $1,529,890.31 Total All Funds $18,970,660.00 $9,362,163.68 49.35% $9,608,496.32 $1,529,890.31 Expenditure Report-December,2012 Storm Water Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Budget Expenditures Expended $(+/-) Paid December S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS Salaries-Permanent $234,880.00 $103,550.76 44.09% $131,329.24 $16,269.38 Salaries-Other $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $11,100.00 $2,504.88 22.57% $8,595.12 $698.40 Payment to Sick Bank Fund $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Payroll Svc&Testing to $480.00 $480.00 100.00% $0.00 $480.00 Fringe Benefits $0.00 $21.19 100.00% ($21.19) $0.00 FICA/Medicare $19,100.00 $8,745.05 45.79% $10,354.95 $1,397.35 Nontaxable Fringe Benefit $0.00 $600.00 100.00% ($600.00) $0.00 Vision Plan $510.00 $0.00 0.00% $510.00 $0.00 Disability Income Insuran $1,340.00 $468.96 35.00% $871.04 $78.16 Group Health Insurance $45,000.00 $17,485.97 38.86% $27,514.03 $2,826.39 Reimburse to Highway Bene $7,020.00 $7,020.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Health Insurance FICA $1,300.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,300.00 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $840.00 $346.50 41.25% $493.50 $57.75 Group Dental Insurance $4,100.00 $1,694.40 41.33% $2,405.60 $301.60 Pension $39,150.00 $0.00 0.00% $39,150.00 $0.00 ICMA Match $6,990.00 $3,329.08 47.63% $3,660.92 $3,329.08 Pension Note Payment $26,510.00 $26,510.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $3,000.00 $1,145.63 38.19% $1,854.37 $827.24 Small Equipment/Tools $4,000.00 $2,948.00 73.70% $1,052.00 $0.00 Uniforms/Supplies $3,885.00 $1,835.17 47.24% $2,049.83 $34.16 Gasoline $4,500.00 $1,557.81 34.62% $2,942.19 $198.84 Oil $350.00 $129.67 37.05% $220.33 $0.00 Diesel Fuel $8,500.00 $2,023.66 23.81% $6,476.34 $114.80 Permit Requirement-Educat $9,300.00 $10,800.00 116.13% ($1,500.00) $4,000.00 Telephone $2,704.00 $487.77 18.04% $2,216.23 $162.60 Postage $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Membership/Dues $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits Renewal $4,770.00 $270.90 5.68% $4,499.10 $148.00 Workers Comp Insurance $16,986.00 $11,772.96 69.31% $5,213.04 $3,906.14 Property Insurance $5,194.00 $3,755.59 72.31% $1,438.41 $1,282.41 Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $1,424.94 71.25% $575.06 $500.32 GIS-Fees/Software $8,355.00 $1,900.00 22.74% $6,455.00 $0.00 Sediment&Depris Disposa $750.00 $0.00 0.00% $750.00 $0.00 Water Quality Monitoring $19,000.00 $5,499.23 28.94% $13,500.77 $182.50 Building/Grounds Maint $1,500.00 $638.00 42.53% $862.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $8,000.00 $7,664.02 95.80% $335.98 $0.00 Storm System Maint Materi $40,000.00 $18,883.09 47.21% $21,116.91 $3,636.71 Printing $100.00 $0.00 0.00% $100.00 $0.00 Legal Services _ $15,000.00 $2,988.75 19.93% $12,011.25 $2,126.25 To GF-Audit and Actuary $3,312.00 $3,312.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Engineering-Watershed $28,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $28,000.00 $0.00 Engineering-Nghbrhd Asst $26,000.00 $9,754.05 37.52% $16,245.95 $195.00 Billing Payment CWD $32,500.00 $16,250.00 50.00% $16,250.00 $0.00 Outside Services-GIS $15,000.00 $2,645.00 17.63% $12,355.00 $0.00 IT/Computer Support $13,300.00 $0.00 0.00% $13,300.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintena $1,000.00 $249.67 24.97% $750.33 $0.00 Equipment Rental $2,000.00 $1,080.00 54.00% $920.00 $0.00 Administrative Services $122,720.00 $122,720.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Conference/Training Expen $4,190.00 $613.00 14.63% $3,577.00 $251.00 S/W Bldg Utilities $3,500.00 $910.77 26.02% $2,589.23 $226.65 Stormwater Pumps Electric $450.00 $96.54 21.45% $353.46 $19.07 Vehicles/Equipment $200,000.00 $30,800.00 15.40% $169,200.00 $0.00 Office Furniture/Equipmen $1,000.00 $69.99 7.00% $930.01 $0.00 Project Notes Princ/Inter $223,245.00 $0.00 0.00% $223,245.00 $0.00 Various Notes-Principal $1,875.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,875.00 $0.00 ERU Rate/Equity Analysis $40,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $40,000.00 $0.00 Reimbursement to Highway $15,600.00 $15,600.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS $1,301,206.00 $452,583.00 34.78% $848,623.00 $43,249.80 STORMWATER PROJECTS Stormwater Capital Projec $2,320,650.00 $565,596.66 24.37% $1,755,053.34 $52,434.10 Consulting/Engineering $0.00 $2,591.31 100.00% ($2,591.31) $0.00 Construction Costs $0.00 $106,790.45 100.00% ($106,790.45) $0.00 Supplies $0.00 $386.16 100.00% ($386.16) $0.00 Engineering $0.00 $1,258.96 100.00% ($1,258.96) $0.00 Construction Costs $0.00 $144,061.76 100.00% ($144,061.76) $0.00 Total STORMWATER PROJECTS $2,320,650.00 $820,685.30 35.36% $1,499,964.70 $52,434.10 Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $3,621,856.00 $1,273,268.30 35.16% $2,348,587.70 $95,683.90 Total All Funds $3,621,856.00 $1,273,268.30 35.16% $2,348,587.70 $95,683.90 Expenditure Report-December,2012 Water Polution Control %Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Budget Expenditures Expended $(+/-) Paid December W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. Salaries-Permanent $346,244.00 $182,835.49 52.81% $163,408.51 $12,105.89 Payment to Highway-wages $245,760.00 $245,760.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $40,000.00 $19,402.45 48.51% $20,597.55 $2,580.15 Payment to Sick Bank Fund $6,850.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,850.00 $0.00 Payroll Svc&Testing to $700.00 $700.00 100.00% $0.00 $700.00 PAFO Certification $9,000.00 $4,500.00 50.00% $4,500.00 $4,500.00 Sick Bank Payouts $13,500.00 $10,968.21 81.25% $2,531.79 $10,968.21 Fringe Benefits $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $29,350.00 $16,439.43 56.01% $12,910.57 $2,238.13 Payment to Highway-FICA/M $18,801.00 $18,800.00 99.99% $1.00 $0.00 Nontaxable Fringe Ben. $0.00 $300.00 100.00% ($300.00) $0.00 Vision Plan $610.00 $0.00 0.00% $610.00 $0.00 Disability Income $1,555.00 $1,408.03 90.55% $146.97 $95.83 Long Term Disability Insu $0.00 $166.61 100.00% ($166.61) $166.61 Group Health Insurance $85,000.00 $31,464.57 37.02% $53,535.43 $5,182.99 Benefit Reimbursed to Hig $62,328.00 $62,238.00 99.86% $90.00 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $840.00 $409.50 48.75% $430.50 $68.25 Group Dental Insurance $4,800.00 $2,860.30 59.59% $1,939.70 $516.97 Pension $33,370.00 $9,109.22 27.30% $24,260.78 $0.00 ICMA Match $3,907.00 $1,900.30 48.64% $2,006.70 $1,900.30 Pension Payment to Highwa $67,470.00 $67,470.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Pension Note Payment $38,675.00 $38,675.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $549.57 27.48% $1,450.43 $235.13 Plant Supplies-lights $60,000.00 $23,417.57 39.03% $36,582.43 $6,576.59 Ferrous Chloride $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 Polymer $32,000.00 $20,350.48 63.60% $11,649.52 $0.00 Sewer Line Maint/Supplies $20,000.00 $7,435.11 37.18% $12,564.89 $151.76 Pumping Station Supplies $25,000.00 $8,655.58 34.62% $16,344.42 $1,072.29 Laboratory Supplies $8,000.00 $8,119.52 101.49% ($119.52) $847.23 Caustic Soda and Lime $11,000.00 $29,646.15 269.51% ($18,646.15) $772.50 Alum $17,000.00 $12,978.93 76.35% $4,021.07 $3,124.90 Water-Airport-B/B-Pump $2,000.00 $256.05 12.80% $1,743.95 $231.19 Generator Preventive Main $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Clothing Supplies $3,600.00 $747.30 20.76% $2,852.70 $96.98 Truck Parts $8,000.00 $2,882.48 36.03% $5,117.52 $6.84 Gas-Diesel Fuel-Oil $16,000.00 $7,675.92 47.97% $8,324.08 $1,253.50 Fuel-Airport Parkway $25,000.00 $14,688.51 58.75% $10,311.49 $2,886.80 Fuel-Bartlett Bay $6,000.00 $288.16 4.80% $5,711.84 $161.35 Telephone and Alarms $3,785.00 $2,726.03 72.02% $1,058.97 $666.82 Postage $100.00 $43.68 43.68% $56.32 $0.00 Memberships/Dues $350.00 $0.00 0.00% $350.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits $7,000.00 $2,218.75 31.70% $4,781.25 $2,098.75 Workers Comp Insurance $14,861.00 $9,856.64 66.33% $5,004.36 $3,236.94 Property Insurance $34,728.00 $27,652.47 79.63% $7,075.53 $11,115.51 Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $1,424.96 71.25% $575.04 $500.32 Billing Payment to CWD $32,500.00 $16,250.00 50.00% $16,250.00 $0.00 Soil/Sludge Management $265,000.00 $44,412.20 16.76% $220,587.80 $7,713.70 Discharge Water Testing $1,500.00 $39.00 2.60% $1,461.00 $39.00 Environmental Studies $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Landfill Fees $7,500.00 $1,765.82 23.54% $5,734.18 $354.46 To GF-Audit/Actuary $4,832.00 $4,832.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Engineering/Consulting $7,500.00 $16,020.26 213.60% ($8,520.26) $0.00 Landfill Engineering $10,000.00 $165'.00 1.65% $9,835.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Contract $1,200.00 $83.34 6.95% $1,116.66 $0.00 Wireless Communication $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Administrative Services $137,280.00 $137,280.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Burlington Sewer Lines $99,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $99,000.00 $0.00 Travel&Training $4,500.00 $144.42 3.21% $4,355.58 $0.00 Utilities-Pumping Station $70,000.00 $19,356.59 27.65% $50,643.41 $3,370.18 Utilities--L/Fill Station $7,000.00 $2,967.69 42.40% $4,032.31 $474.12 Electric-Airport Parkway $200,000.00 $77,129.46 38.56% $122,870.54 $17,463.90 Electric-Bartlett Bay $105,000.00 $44,809.60 42.68% $60,190.40 $8,472.31 Replacement-Vehicles $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,000.00 $0.00 Pumps Replacements $100,000.00 $40,846.37 40.85% $59,153.63 $0.00 Pump Repairs $25,000.00 $11,382.05 45.53% , $13,617.95 $0.00 Payment to GF for Ortho $1,875.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,875.00 $0.00 Bartlett Bay Bond Replace $245,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $245,000.00 $0.00 Total W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. $2,668,971.00 $1,314,504.77 49.25% $1,354,466.23 $113,946.40 Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C. $2,668,971.00 $1,314,504.77 49.25% $1,354,466.23 $113,946.40 Total All Funds $2,668,971.00 $1,314,504.77 49.25% $1,354,466.23 $113,946.40 Revenue Report-December,2012 General Fund Estimated Received %Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $(+/-) Received-Dec TAX REVENUE Tax,Current Budget $11,210,483.00 ($7,941,356.31) 70.84% $3,269,126.69 ($860,904.88) VT Payment in Lieu of Tax $47,000.00 ($33,692.00) 71.69% $13,308.00 $0.00 Taxes,Reappraisal/ACT 60 $71,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $71,000.00 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $11,328,483.00 ($7,975,048.31) 70.40% $3,353,434.69 ($860,904.88) LOCAL OPTION TAXES Local Option Tax-Sales $2,625,000.00 ($940,065.18) 35.81% $1,684,934.82 $0.00 Local Option Tax-Rooms/Me $104,760.00 ($350,729.31) 334.79% ($245,969.31) $0.00 Rooms/Meals-Fire Vehicl $335,240.00 $0.00 0.00% $335,240.00 $0.00 Rooms/Meals-P/D Hdqtrs $360,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $360,000.00 $0.00 Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,425,000.00 ($1,290,794.49) 37.69% $2,134,205.51 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $14,753,483.00 ($9,265,842.80) 62.80% $5,487,640.20 ($860,904.88) INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX Penalty,Current&Prior $105,000.00 ($82,361.83) 78.44% $22,638.17 $808.93 Insurance Reimbursements $0.00 ($1,010.10) 100.00% ($1,010.10) $0.00 Interest,Current&Prior $42,500.00 ($18,402.78) 43.30% $24,097.22 ($2,037.03) Attorney Fees $0.00 ($3,638.99) 100.00% ($3,638.99) $0.00 Fee to Collect State Educ $75,000.00 ($79,063.67) 105.42% ($4,063.67) ($79,063.67) Current Use $13,000.00 ($15,008.00) 115.45% ($2,008.00) ($15,008.00) Per Parcel Payment Traini $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $236,000.00 ($199,485.37) 84.53% $36,514.63 ($95,299.77) CITY MANAGER Administrative Services-W $42,640.00 ($42,640.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Administrative Services-S $122,720.00 ($122,720.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Administrative Services-W $137,280.00 ($137,280.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 From Sewer-Audit&Actuar $4,832.00 ($4,832.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 From SW-Audit&Actuary $3,312.00 ($3,312.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Wellness Payment $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,000.00 $0.00 COBRA Repayment $20,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,200.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-WPC $38,675.00 ($38,675.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-SW $26,510.00 ($26,510.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 From Water-Audit $2,100.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,100.00 $0.00 DPSA Insurance Reimb. $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,000.00 $0.00 Admin Svc Fee Fund 240 $30,000.00 ($30,000.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 From SW for Ortho $1,875.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,875.00 $0.00 From WPC for Ortho $1,875.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,875.00 $0.00 PD 3rd Floor Lease Rent $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 From WPC-Payroll,Testing $700.00 ($700.00) 100.00% $0.00 ($700.00) From SW-Payroll,Testing $480.00 ($480.00) 100.00% $0.00 ($480.00) Insurance/Leadership $0.00 ($139.17) 100.00% ($139.17) $0.00 Insurance Reimbursement $0.00 ($11,137.94) 100.00% ($11,137.94) ($6,470.21) • Miscellaneous $2,000.00 ($2,193.39) 109.67% ($193.39) $0.00 Total CITY MANAGER $460,199.00 ($420,619.50) 91.40% $39,579.50 ($7,650.21) CITY CLERK Returned Check Fees $50.00 $0.00 0.00% $50.00 $0.00 Recording Fees $150,000.00 ($91,637.00) 61.09% $58,363.00 ($17,815.00) Photocopy Fees $30,000.00 ($13,004.98) 43.35% $16,995.02 ($2,686.25) Photocopies-Vital Records $8,000.00 ($2,178.00) 27.23% $5,822.00 ($288.00) Pet Licenses $35,000.00 ($930.00) 2.66% $34,070.00 $0.00 Pet Control Fees $3,000.00 ($995.00) 33.17% $2,005.00 $0.00 Beverage/Cabaret License $6,000.00 ($400.00) 6.67% $5,600.00 ($100.00) Entertainment Permits $300.00 ($100.00) 33.33% $200.00 ($50.00) Fish&Game Licenses $100.00 ($50.00) 50.00% $50.00 $0.00 Marriage Licenses $1,750.00 ($835.00) 47.71% $915.00 ($70.00) Green Mountain Passports $150.00 ($154.00) 102.67% ($4.00) $0.00 Motor Vehicle Renewals $2,000.00 ($420.00) 21.00% $1,580.00 ($48.00) Expedited Mailing Service $250.00 $0.00 0.00% $250.00 $0.00 School Reimburse-Election $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 Interest on Investments $80,000.00 ($20,365.95) 25.46% $59,634.05 ($9,147.08) Total CITY CLERK $318,600.00 ($131,069.93) 41.14% $187,530.07 ($30,204.33) PLANNING Building&Sign Permits $180,000.00 ($92,628.16) 51.46% $87,371.84 ($8,690.80) Bianchi Ruling $6,000.00 ($3,843.00) 64.05% $2,157.00 ($390.00) Ordinance Fines $0.00 ($387.50) 100.00% ($387.50) $0.00 Zoning and Planning $60,000.00 ($35,328.62) 58.88% $24,671.38 ($10,207.82) Sewer Inspection Fees $0.00 ($2,250.00) 100.00% ($2,250.00) ($250.00) Peddlers'Permits $1,000.00 ($970.00) 97.00% $30.00 $0.00 Legal Permit Review $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Market Street Grant $29,690.00 $0.00 0.00% $29,690.00 $0.00 MPG 11 Grant Revenue $15,000.00 ($4,500.00) 30.00% $10,500.00 $0.00 Independent Techincal Rev $10,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,500.00 $0.00 Grant Revenue-EECBG $0.00 ($43,600.00) 100.00% ($43,600.00) ($43,600.00) Zoning Violations $0.00 ($150.00) 100.00% ($150.00) $0.00 Total PLANNING $305,190.00 ($183,657.28) 60.18% $121,532.72 ($63,138.62) FIRE DEPARTMENT Engine Trade In $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 Outside Employment $7,200.00 ($3,730.00) 51.81% $3,470.00 ($450.00) Misc.Revenue-Fire Dept. $0.00 ($5,677.34) 100.00% ($5,677.34) $0.00 Fire Inspection Revenue $200,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $200,000.00 $0.00 Fire Impact Fees-Fund Tru $136,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $136,000.00 $0.00 Loan Proceeds-MB-Quint $0.00 ($440,250.00) 100.00% ($440,250.00) $0.00 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $347,200.00 ($449,657.34) 129.51% ($102,457.34) ($450.00) AMBULANCE Tax Revenues $155,000.00 ($155,000.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Ambulance Service Billing $671,000.00 ($231,671.02) 34.53% $439,328.98 ($22,221.50) Williston Billing $18,000.00 ($9,256.91) 51.43% $8,743.09 ($1,178.10) Grand Isle Billing $6,000.00 ($2,610.95) 43.52% $3,389.05 ($664.61) Patient Care Equip Grant $5,000.00 ($5,000.00) 100.00% $0.00 ($5,000.00) I Total AMBULANCE $855,000.00 ($403,538.88) 47.20% $451,461.12 ($29,064.21) POLICE DEPARTMENT Vermont District Court $110,000.00 ($28,184.91) 25.62% $81,815.09 ($1,999.50) Traffic Safety Grant $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Sale of Cruisers/Bequest $4,000.00 ($3,010.00) 75.25% $990.00 $0.00 Police Reports $6,500.00 ($6,428.21) 98.90% $71.79 ($610.00) I.C.A.C. $0.00 ($2,066.32) 100.00% ($2,066.32) $0.00 Drug Task Force Grant $39,336.00 ($15,210.95) 38.67% $24,125.05 $0.00 Asset Forfeiture for Trai $8,380.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,380.00 $0.00 Parking Tickets $500.00 ($145.00) 29.00% $355.00 ($65.00) Alarm Registrations $9,000.00 ($4,465.00) 49.61% $4,535.00 ($360.00) Alarm Fines $1,500.00 ($1,430.00) 95.33% $70.00 ($180.00) Off Duty Police $33,060.00 ($35,153.03) 106.33% ($2,093.03) ($383.95) Reparative Board Grant $72,803.00 $0.00 0.00% $72,803.00 $0.00 BYRNE Grant $25,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $25,000.00 $0.00 Miscellaneous-Police $0.00 ($515.00) 100.00% ($515.00) ($300.00) Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $325,079.00 ($96,608.42) 29.72% $228,470.58 ($3,898.45) HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Road Opening Permits $155,000.00 ($42,080.00) 27.15% $112,920.00 ($2,950.00) Overweight truck permits $100.00 ($120.00) 120.00% ($20.00) ($5.00) Highway State Aid $211,721.00 ($184,243.70) 87.02% $27,477.30 $0.00 Class II Paving Grant $134,520.00 $0.00 0.00% $134,520.00 $0.00 Fuel Pump Surcharge $1,000.00 ($2,617.39) 261.74% ($1,617.39) ($484.64) HazMat Facility Lease $17,500.00 ($9,408.98) 53.77% $8,091.02 $0.00 School Bus Parts Reimbure $32,500.00 ($21,991.52) 67.67% $10,508.48 ($4,085.15) School gas/diesel reimbur $130,000.00 ($76,271.62) 58.67% $53,728.38 ($68,347.51) School vehicle repair pay $17,700.00 $0.00 0.00% $17,700.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-WPC $245,760.00 ($245,760.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 FICA Reimbursement-WPC $18,800.00 ($18,800.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Pension Reimbursement-WPC $67,470.00 ($67,470.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-WP $62,238.00 ($62,238.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-SW $15,600.00 ($15,600.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-SW $7,020.00 ($7,020.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Vehicle Trade In $12,500.00 ($40,904.00) 327.23% ($28,404.00) $0.00 Sewer Inspection Fee $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Highway Impact Fee-RT 2 $90,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $90,000.00 $0.00 Hgwy Misc Fuel $4,000.00 ($21,231.41) 530.79% ($17,231.41) $46,558.94 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,224,429.00 ($815,756.62) 66.62% $408,672.38 ($29,313.36) TREE RPLCMNT/MNTNCE Tree Replacement Fee $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Total TREE RPLCMNT/MNTNCE $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 RECREATION RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Gate Receipts $4,700.00 ($5,206.00) 110.77% ($506.00) $0.00 Total RED ROCKS PARK $4,700.00 ($5,206.00) 110.77% ($506.00) $0.00 FACILITIES J/C Park Rentals $300.00 ($350.00) 116.67% ($50.00) $0.00 Total FACILITIES $300.00 ($350.00) 116.67% ($50.00) $0.00 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Great Escape Ticket Sales $17,000.00 ($13,703.00) 80.61% $3,297.00 $0.00 Aternoon Skiing/Middle Sc $6,300.00 ($5,566.00) 88.35% $734.00 ($810.00) Afternoon Skiing/Orchard $6,900.00 ($2,770.00) 40.14% $4,130.00 ($2,710.00) Tennis Class Receipts $4,700.00 ($4,618.00) 98.26% $82.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $63,000.00 ($65,338.50) 103.71% ($2,338.50) Evening Classes $27,000.00 0 ($2,007.00) ($23,075.00) 85.46/o $3,925.00 ($2,007.00) Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $124,900.00 ($115,070.50) 92.13% $9,829.50 ($14,117.00) Total RECREATION $129,900.00 ($120,626.50) 92.86% $9,273.50 ($14,117.00) COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Lost Books $0.00 ($314.18) 100.00% ($314.18) ($314.18) Late Book Charges/Fines $3,000.00 ($848.95) 28.30% $2,151.05 ($225.00) Non-Resident Fees $750.00 Blanchette Gift ($495.00) 66.00%o $255.00 ($225.00) $9,730.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,730.00 $0.00 C/L Photocopies $500.00 ($730.00) 146.00% ($230.00) ) ($300.00) Bookmobile Donations $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Library Miscellaneous $0.00 ($114.00) 100.00% ($114.00) ($114.00) Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $14,980.00 ($2,502.13) 16.70% $12,477.87 ($1,757.13) PARK MAINTENANCE Cemetery Trust-Trsf In $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Total PARK MAINTENANCE $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Total GENERAL FUND $18,970,660.00 ($12,089,364.77) 63.73% $6,881,295.23 ($1,135,797.96) Total All Funds $18,970,660.00 ($12,089,364.77) 63.73% $6,881,295.23 ($1,135,797.96) Revenue Report-December,2012 Stormwater Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $(+/-) Received-Dec S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE S/W User Fees-Water Bil $1,888,104.00 ($930,803.21) 49.30% $957,300.79 ($218,740.78) State of VT Fee for Servi $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $50,000.00 $0.00 SW Grants $1,189,650.00 ($531,813.70) 44.70% $657,836.30 $0.00 Land Owner Payments $34,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $34,200.00 $0.00 Stormwater Miscellaneous $0.00 ($20.00) 100.00% ($20.00) $0.00 Reserve Transfer In $460,160.00 $0.00 0.00% $460,160.00 $0.00 Miscellaneous Income $0.00 ($78.00) 100.00% ($78.00) $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE $3,622,114.00 ($1,462,636.91) 40.38% $2,159,477.09 ($218,740.78) Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $3,622,114.00 ($1,462,714.91) 40.38% $2,159,399.09 ($218,740.78) Total All Funds $3,622,114.00 ($1,462,714.91) 40.38% $2,159,399.09 ($218,740.78) Revenue Report-December,2012 Water Polution Control Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2013 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $(+/-) Received-Dec WATER POLLUTION CONTROL CHARGES FOR SERVICES W.P.C.User Fees $3,131,442.00 ($1,712,241.82) 54.68% $1,419,200.18 ($313,240.09) W.P.C.Truck Charges $50,000.00 ($1,314.50) 2.63% $48,685.50 $0.00 Connection Fees $106,090.00 ($77,437.22) 72.99% $28,652.78 ($12,621.69) Enviromental Impact $35,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $35,000.00 $0.00 Total CHARGES FOR SERVICES $3,322,532.00 ($1,790,993.54) 53.90% $1,531,538.46 ($325,861.78) MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Rev.-W.P.C. $0.00 ($26,184.00) 100.00% ($26,184.00) $0.00 Total MISCELLANEOUS $0.00 ($26,184.00) 100.00% ($26,184.00) $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS IN $3,322,532.00 ($1,817,177.54) 54.69% $1,505,354.46 ($325,861.78) Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C. $3,322,532.00 ($1,817,177.54) 54.69% $1,505,354.46 ($325,861.78) Total All Funds $3,322,532.00 ($1,817,177.54) 54.69% $1,505,354.46 ($325,861.78) etos sauthburlington PUBLIC WORKS MEMO To: Sandy Miller,City Manager From: Justin Rabidoux,Director if Date: January 30, 2013 Re: Certificate of Highway Mileage Please find enclosed the following paperwork needed for the City to properly record and inventory its new streets with the State of Vermont. 1. A memo from DPW Engineering Technician,Todd Gregory,detailing each new or reconfigured street.The total net new miles of city streets is 1.5 miles. 2. A Certificate of Highway Mileage,Year Ending February 10,2013,to be signed by the City Council and City Clerk. 3. Certificates of Completion and Opening of a Highway for Public Travel for each street listed in 2,above.These need to be signed by the Council and Clerk. 4. Warranty Deeds for each new or reconfigured street. State Statute does not require a resolution by the Council, merely their signatures on all the enclosed paperwork where noted.Once the paperwork is completed,DPW staff will forward to VTrans along with the agenda and minutes of the meeting,when they become available. Please let me know if you have any questions. Staff will be at the City Council meeting to discuss as needed. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington. VT 05403 tel 802.658 7961 fax 802.658 7976 www.sburl.corn Physical Address 104 Landfill Road South Burlington southburtingtoii PUBLIC WORKS Memo To: City of South Burlington Council From: Todd Gregory, Engineering Technician,City of South Burlington Public Works CC: Justin Rabidoux,Tom Dipietro Date: January 23,2013 Re: Certificate of Highway Mileage,Year Ending February 10,2012 During the last two (2) years The City of South Burlington had opened eight (8) new streets and reconfigured one(1). Attached are the Certificate of Highway Mileage forms which indicate the actual linear footage and Right-Of-Way(R.O.W.)for these streets. Please refer to the table below for the specific streets and linear footage, LINEAR STREET FT MILEAGE DATE Southpointe Drive 1091 0.2066 10/18/2011 Upswept Lane 819 0.1551 10/18/2011 Parkside Srive 416 0.0788 10/18/2011 Songbird Road 2791 0.5286 10/18/2011 Chickadee Circle 586 0.1110 10/18/2011 Hummingbird Lane 1057 0.2002 10/18/2011 Woodthrush Circle 556 0.1053 10/1/2011 Wildflower Drive 693 0.1313 11/13/2012 National Guard Avenue* 10111 1.9150 8/8/2012 *NOTE-National Guard Avenue was a reconfiguration, the previous distance was 10172 (1.9256 miles) If you have any questions, please contact me at(802)658—7961 x104 or tgregoryt sburi.com. 5%5 Dorset Street South Burlington, VI 05403 tel 802.658./961 fax 802.658./976 www.sburi.com Physical Address. 104 Landfill Road South Burlington District 5 CERTIFICATE OF HIGHWAY MILEAGE YEAR ENDING FEBRUARY 10,2013 Fill out form,make and file copy with the Town Clerk,and mail ORIGINAL,before February 20,2013 to: Vermont Agency of Transportation,Division of Policy,Planning and Intermodal Development, One National Life Drive,Montpeller, VT 05633. We,the members of the legislative body of SO.BURLINGTON in CHITTENDEN County on an oath state that the mileage of highways,according to Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 19,Section 305, added 1985,is as follows: PART 1-CHANGES TOTALS-Please fill in and calculate totals. Town Previous Added Subtracted Scenic Highways Mileage Mileage Mileage Total Highways Class 1 2.289 0 0 Z•2- 9 0.000 Class 2 19.107 0 ° (CIAO * 0.000 Class 3 56.52 3 .4-3 Z L I R Z.71- 5 • DZ S 0.000 State Highway t 17.017 0 0 14. oil- 0.000 i A Total t 94.933 3. 4-.3Z- t ,c'l 7-1- -I 1p 4 0 O400 t * Class T Lane 5.512 t CG t d S ,s 1 2...i 0.000 t t (© , i 0 0 * Class d t 1.17 i C.' t l' i t 0 O c7 ' * Legal Trail 0.00 0 :— * Unidentified 0.00 0 t 0 0 ' V Corridor *Mileage for Class I Lane,Class d,Legal Trail,and Unidentified Corridor classifications are NOT included in total. PART II-INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES SHOWN ABOVE I. NEW HIGHWAYS: Please attach Selectmen's"Certificate of Completion and Opening". 2. DISCONTINUED: Please attach SIGNED copy of proceedings(minutes of meeting). 3. RECLASSIFIED/REMEASURED: Please attach SIGNED copy of proceedings(minutes of meeting). 4. SCENIC HIGHWAYS: Please attach a copy of order designating/discontinuing Scenic Highways. THERE ARE NO CHANGES IN MILEAGE: Check box and sign below / 1 •RT HI-SIGNATURES-PLEASE SIGN. Selectmen/Aldermen/Trustees Signatures; _ .--.____.____ ______ _...._.__..-_— /CN Clerk Signature: ___ Date Filed: ease sign ORIGINAL and return it for Transportation signature. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVAL: Signed copy will be returned to TIC/V Clerk. APPROVED: DATE: Representative,Agency of Transportation CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL DoN',IA KiniVie-LE , ,rTY Clerk of the LiTY of (Clerk's Name) (City/Town/Wage) (CityrTownNtltage) SooT.4, SU FZ-4.-if‘i Grit1\) ,Vermont. (City/TownNilage Name) Pursuant to Title 19, V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the (.1 Y 1 of S-c L%1-e 13,02-i—IcsiLION. was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) (CityrrownNitlage) (City/Town/Village Name) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on nor,- rz L , 7 i t . (Month-Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning Al- -1-4 ziNtT 1 an 0/ . 1 bU J T- .1Jc=l L.O( r-+— o N -rt-t -t- — (D .... ©c' s- sae.. S-r'Q - 4i,"_ cr✓r t c-).Ni V t.-4(..., s-r- F=bt2 A" tl P€' d°ar AAi'-r-v: jai r"A r-4 C-.t:. 0 C I OS i It N iG—At _+---r— w 1-r-e- ray Z•C i -ir11. o i- ucr t FL:.�r C-t/) I .f to t nii(o A-T 'PA P-1C. IOC.-- -D C.--1.: and as shown on a Highway Map of the CJ of S'Curzt ue-ts e-J ,dated "y (City/rownNiaage) (City/TownNivage Name) Ocb CI t' , t i , and filed in Book(c3L on page 1_Z of the Records of the ( onth-Day) (Year) (Soo) CA #) (Page#) 1�Y of 'ram 'Eu2undbb, C_ J by the ATN/ Clerk of said (.r.IT`{ (City/Town/Village) (City/TownMuage Name) (City/TownNillage) (Cily/TownNillage) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the C,IT`(. Clerk. (City/Town/Village) Dated at,SN,rrCI ui, ,14.1Ut , County of 6-41TTeniDEM and State of Vermont, (City/Town/Village Name) (County Name) this !8 day of Cyr =-- . , A.D., 0-- tit (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) BOARD "' OF (Selectman/ ,,S (Seectman/Alderman/TrusteeSignature) SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Sign...- (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) , ALDERMAN, (Selectman/Aloerrnen/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) or TRUSTEES (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of . (City/Town/Village Name) **********************************Mirk****fr****icy/*ate******* ******+t****************************** rig ' 'rocanLL-TtJ ,VERMONT Oc1 R- oI . i8 , 2c_�tt (CityaownMllage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS -3' HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK iS,42 ON PAGE,2t-Z OF THE L.4ndt> RECORDS #)OF THE f` t1Y OF ;.1 ew '- 1 t et- i J (THE HE ( #) ON T l 6 DAY OF 0CT0 F"�, i, (Cny/TownNtllage) (City/TownNtllage Name) (Date-Day) (Date-Month) ;a i i , AT 12- O'CLOCK,(1n .M. (Date-Year) (Time) COMA, ATTEST: (Clerk's Name) • CLERK OF ,VERMONT (City/ram/wiage) (City/TownNiilage Name) Revision 12/2005 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY far PUBLIe TRAVEL Cif Clerk of the €. of p© lame) �/�) ( L , (City/TcwnNiilage) (Clerk'serk's Name) (City/Token/Village) 500i Eu faj PI 6-112)/‘) ,Vermont. (CityrtownNlage Name) Pursuant to Title 19,V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C./r`f of i-;1-,4 ' N.G.1ror was COMPLETED AND ��, (1,2,3 or 4) (City/Town/Village) (City/Town/Village Name) l t OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on (CST`Monthoayl -� t`2' ' (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY:Beginning ta-r '1G e-Afsr- / Gr U psW,c c7 1 �L�t� CcJ,u-rt�.( 0 t Ni(4)1-OC 4'T 0 ©yi 'fie WIcST •S iP u a=- 134a'te_ t0--- 1�L t !`+b"-L LA ' i F Uc b e : it�-t Pv i/4-14z. D R-01 L.,1 •Ra=-taT W 1-T h -ic. . `uV 0.= fo C7 r ("; /r` C-1-r1` of .a.t�� -guit4r~Ev' v ,dated and as shown on a Highway Map of the (ctty/TewnMltage) (crty/TownMtlage Name) OtrO .. 1`6 , Zo 1 , and filed in Book 1O1i on page 3Z1.2 of the Records of the (Year) (Book#) (Page#) ( ortN-Day) bythe C+. Clerk of said L..i_ S Of ��� �:a��.ar�El:"jt�F� (CitylfowrtNilage) (City/TownNiliage) (CitytTownNillage Name) (City/Town/Village) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the (City/To N�(ge) Clerk. it'tt tpt:, , County of IT-ref,'D--m and State of Vermont, Dated at �4 g (City/TownNi?lae Name) (County Name) thisday �� ' of C2� c'-9- ,A.D., t t BOARD f. (Date-Month) OF `�� (Date-Year}' I SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (SelectmanrAdermanl'Trustee_ Al- ALDERMAN, (Selecartan/Alderman/TNstee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) or TRUSTEES (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee n/Trustee Signature) (Manager/Mayor Signature)and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of , (c ty/TownNl{age Name) 0C 0I .= I e) 2c.Dt1 5eu ems„n[ Gt €J ,VERMONT (Montn-oay) ' (Year) (CityaownNiitage Name) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS S HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND or 4) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK 1652-ON PAGE'-5"'-'i-2 OF THE LANt7 RECORDS (Book#) g (Page#) �r^v 4 P .C,)�iiNi61 v ON THE i ij DAY OF � '_'=7iC�i_ R. , OF THE �'E t J OF= (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (GtyliownNitage) Q ,e) ^ 11 , AT 12-. K .) (Date-Year) (Time) � --!"` ATTEST: (Clerk's Name) CLERK OF ,VERMONT (CftyrrownNittage) (City/TownNitIage Name) Revision 12/2005 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL PoN/4 Kt r iV i L t. 67Y Clerk of the C J 1 of (Clerk's Name) (City/TownNillage) (City/TownNillage) 530't7-4 SOihiA 6-11) J ,Vermont. (City/TownNtlage Name) Pursuant to Title 19, V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C.-iTsr of So L'-rzi-**goes-ic44- tDiv was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3or4) (City/TownNiliage) (City(TownNillageName) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on 4Z-�,i ti ►8 , l t( . (Month•Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning A-r -t*-c;� Sc,L)--r-,.t. 1>.a,t CAD a 1:3s.sier.5 tO biz i\Ic= , Lx)c-A-r t 4 c •tug <,A. r— ..r.ia c,z '- . :71-Ck PC,1 ir Decv , A P.to c i,..1.rrivta4 A P P i is k't n4 4 t , t Li Y+1 r�!a 2 W 1--r i- b " , _4A!- 0= e3 C� (-f- -- e xio r A i-t, •,,.i-- -Tug tB D E..to -r- •-t-r-k �� `T- e °-3rJ Gam+&= U f J E.0:-=t�T t..._4..VitZ and as shown on a Highway Map of the CID( of S X TZZ. -gv( .(itG-tz.i,! , dated LTA { (C)tyrrownNillage) (City/TownNillage Name) �k ,and filed in Book Ida on page32/1 of the Records of the ( onth-Day) (Year) (Boo #) (Page#) ir( of&.rr4, 'E ,4..`brJ by the r`i' Clerk of said C r r (CityrrownNillage) (CrtyrrownNillage Name) (City/TownNillage) (City/TownNillage) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the LET'( Clerk. (City/TownNillage) Dated at 5, ,rrq Euizi,iAtirry , County of C5-4ITTE,s11De/4 and State of Vermont, (City/TownNillage Name) (County Name) this I8' day of licce.:, - � A.D. 2-0 i 1 . (Date-Da Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) BOARD OF (Se;ectma,,.. Zi • (SelectmeNAlderman/Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderma&Trus,... (Selectmen/Alderman/Trustee Signature) ALDERMAN, (SelectrnanrAloerm NA anlrrustee Signature) (Setectmalderman/rrustee Signature) DI TRUSTEES (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of . (CityrrownNillage Name) Sbix ut'..LiAl Crrbtsd ,VERMONT INTO -P_ 18 , i'ld t E (CtyrrownN9tage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS - HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (1.2,3 or 4) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK IU Z ON PAGE32l1. OF THE /AN) RECORDS (Book#) (Page#) t�i OF THE OF lZ LIt...& t,i L"b,s ON THE t C> DAY OF OCTOt , (CtyrrownNiilage) (CityrrownNillage Name) (Date-Day) (Date-Month) 20 1I , AT 12 e 'COCK, t- .M. (Dale-Year) (Time) (A or P) ATTEST: (Clerk's Name) y CLERK OF ,VERMONT (City/TownNillage) (City)TownNillage Name) Revision 12/2005 00016225 V a 1032 PG: 321 C:ITY CLERK 'S OFFICE _ l�1s2�Sl� Received Oct 18f2011 02:OOP Recorded in VOL: 1032 PG: 321 OF So. Burlington Land Records Attest WARRANTY DEED Donna Kinville City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that THE SNYDER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,a Vermont limited partnership,with an office in Essex Junction, the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON,a Vermont municipality in the County ofChittenden and State of Vermont("Grantee"),by these presents does freely GIVE,GRANT,SELL,CONVEY,AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee,CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON,its successors and assigns forever, a parcel of land located in the City of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont described as follows,viz: A parcel of land for roadway purposes and all improvements thereon,being Lot 37 of South Pointe, consisting of sixty foot wide(60')strips of land designated as"South Pointe Drive"and"Upswept Lane"and an eighty foot wide(80')strip designated as"Parkside Drive,"being 3.90 acres,more or less,as depicted on a plat entitled:"South Pointe,The Snyder Group,Inc., 1700 Spear Street,South Burlington, Subdivision Plat," Sheet No. 13, prepared by Lamoureux and Dickinson Consulting Engineers,Inc.,dated April 3,2003, last revised May 7,2004 and recorded in Map Volume 437 at Page 2 of the City of South Burlington Land Records(the"Plat"). The above-described Property is conveyed to Grantee for use for municipal road, utility and stormwater drainage purposes. This Deed shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey all improvements located on, over and under the Property, including but not limited to all roadway improvements,sidewalks,sewer and water mains and appurtenances,and stormwater pipes,catch basins,and appurtenances. The herein conveyed lands and premises also include sight distance and utility easements in such locations as depicted on the Plat and as shown in detail on the Plat as"20' site distance and utility easements to the City of South Burlington." By acceptance and recording of this Warranty Deed,Grantee acknowledges that it has received the necessary"as-built"certifications and test results, and has performed the investigations it deems necessary to accept the above-mentioned improvements in their"as is-where is"condition. Said lands and premises are a portion of all and the same lands and premises conveyed to The Snyder South Pointe Limited Partnership by Warranty Deed of Raymond R. Unsworth and Norma C. Unsworth dated October 12, 2004 and recorded in Volume 684 at Page 695 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said lands and premises are subject to the following: (1) terms and conditions of the State of Vermont Land Use Permit No.4C 1 137 dated ,2005 and recorded in Volume at Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records;(2)terms and conditions of the State of Vermont Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit No.WW-4-2048 dated August 18, 2004 and recorded in Volume 680 at Page 227 of the City of South Burlington Land Records;(3)terms and conditions of the South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact and Decision #SD-03-74 dated December 5, 2003; (4) terms and conditions of the South Burlington Development Review Board Findings of Fact and Decision #SD-04-37 dated June 1, 2004; (5) terms and conditions of State of Vermont Discharge Permit No. 3443-INDS dated , 2005 and recorded in Volume at Page_____of the City of South Burlington 00016225 Ve 1032 PG: 322 Land Records;(6)terms and conditions of Water System Permit to Construct No.WSID#5091 dated January 30,2004; (7)terms and conditions of Conditional Use Determination No.2003-148 dated January 5, 2004 and recorded in Volume 653 at Page 168 of the City of South Burlington Land Records;and(8)all easements and rights of way depicted on the Plat. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned deeds, plans and other instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted premises,with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof,to the said Grantee,CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns,to their own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, THE SNYDER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP does for itself and its successors and assigns,covenant with the said Grantee,CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON its successors and assigns,that until the ensealing of these presents,it is the sole owner of the premises,and it has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid,that they are free from every encumbrance;except as aforesaid,and it hereby engages to Warrant and Defend the same against all lawful claims whatever,except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SNYDER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, as evidenced by the(signature of its Duly Authorized Agent,does hereby execute this Easement Deed as of the rill day of ti„lcrvt 0 ,2005. IN PRESENCE OF: THE SNYDER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: The Champlain Land Company, Inc. Its General Partner Witness D Authorized Agt<tt STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On this y' dayof J� 1 [� ,2005,personally appeared CQil,�,5 � d < Duly Authorized Agent of The Champlain Land Company,Inc.,General Partner of THE SN1JER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument,and he acknowledged this instrument,by him signed,to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of The Champlain Land Company, Inc. and THE SNYDER SOUTH POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. Before me, Vermont Proaerts Transfer Tax Notary Pub c 32 V.S.A. Chop) 231 —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT— RETURN REC'D-TAX PAID BOARD Notary commission issued in Chittenden County OF HEALTH CERT. REC'D. My commission expires: 2/10/07 VT LAND USE d DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'D Return No. Kinville City Clerk -2- Date Oct 18r2D11 CERTIIICATE of coMPLETIOI attd ®P1r.l !N of a H.IG'HWAY for PUBLIC TRAIL n �{ COY Clerk of the �-fT-i of r©'�a e) i�L� , (City/Town/Village) (City/TownMllage) (Clerk's Name) 0...Lint OD IQ ,Vermont. (City/TownNilage Name) Pursuant to Title 19,V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the G. 'I of C'-)-r-i ;,,z�•iGo. was COMPLETED AND (T (1,2,3 or 4) (City/Town/Village) (City/ToymMllage Name) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on OC-T© ,? t 6 , 2.v tl (Month-Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning AT --tue V.7:- -t` ,Si Os✓ Ot_ , lat; S-vrz`'` " Akio C 0 r.l`t i..i i r4 LJ.z 0" r1.6 i._--• i iZ 0- .. O f--'iJ -,Di2 1. NI 1t P P I2-0 i.C•J r t)i\5 A.3Ni t� - . O F= �-- 1 L-i.1 E:.G.e. -1.:-`r'"' ILA.; i-T, : f-1 ''--t5. irj: 0 i'- 6C3 C-+�'-' �,�)D t,'f to z,-f -rGt t ti' S i 0 CAI: Pc"CaS4. ;-r S- ..� of S.tor.4 -guiLtl�U"it ,dated and as shown on a Highway Map of the (City/Town/Village)illage) (Gty/TownMllage Name) CfO Cx.:4 k 5 , 2-0 It ,and filed in Book tO3Z on page3 5-S of the Records of the (Year) (Book#) (Page#) onth-Day) of f S 7r JRU W. J by the C.,(r`f. Clerk of said L.`r" ( (C)ty/TownMllage) /TowriMllage Name) (City/rownNiltage) (CiIY/rownN�lage} (C'tY incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the (carry-�) Clerk. Dated at&LI.4 ‘gtUd-IVt ,County of 64 rrreN De.t and State of Vermont, (C)ty/To„nMllage Name) (County Name) this i S day of C12. ,A.D., 24.73 i1 BOARD (Date-Month) (Date-Year) (Date-Day) OF (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (SefectmaMAldermen/Trustee Signature) ALDERMAN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) or TRUSTEES (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (SelenmaniAlderman/Trustee Signature) (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of (Gty/TownNtlage Name) Sf)UTE-Fgr212.Li/ U: tit-{ ,VERMONT C CIc7'3^ -- I b , l i (Month-Day) (Gty/TownMllage Name) THE ABOVE IS A I fltUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS � HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (1.2,30r4) LAN t> RECORDS OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK(B ook ) P ON PAGE'-( age OF THE �CrY OF OF THE � T4 -Etvt t�: -04 ON THE i c% DAY OF OcTO i3:'>-. , (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (Gty/TownNillage) (GtyRownNllWge Name) G C) i( , AT "'n✓ -Vra- O'CLOCK, .M. (A orP) (Date-Year) Crime) P ATTEST: (Genes Name) CLERK OF ,VERMONT (City/TownNltage) (Gty/TownNttage Name) Revision 12/2005 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL DoN"44 K?ts/V[I..Le , C,tTY Clerk of the City of (Clerk's Name) (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNiltage) SGirr 1 &Yt L rJ&-"Otv ,Vermont. (City/Town/Vilage Name) Pursuant to Title 19,V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that�u the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C.-Ir.( of Sp u-ram•g N-aTz:)A 1 was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) (City/TownNillage) (Ctty/TownMllage Name) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on Oc:-zb j- ,a VB , 2 C t t - (Month-Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning AA-r t,•J. le. ._c_--r-t Qf...1 c)P Cc.a,c..( , C�t t2 c,-c. t L-.t C A`-t- f_l 0, , `T-t '?T.- S i 0. 0 i- i m.er., t� i -lam ' 'oA D , .A N D c cw-i-v 1 r.i O a..)-r'-4 A iz t::,WI,wt-- --r S e(o i..-1 r l a tz-. Ft-.---m- k,v i —r A t2•C? .W. 6 rr So -F' .' C f/- ) 4 h(o c pia ii V A 4 C- t o ria .EA-c-ii-.- t and as shown on a Highway Map of the C.,17`f of Seism u .tN(--t-o,..! , dated ®C C' t( (City/TownNUage) (City/Town/Village Name) , and filed in Book(0 on page Z 6"of the Records of the ( onth-Day) (Year) (Book#) (Page#) of tr-t `-" �urLG'Ibt+J by the (,ir';' Clerk of said C.,.i ' (City/Town/Village) (OtylTownNtllage Name) (Crty/rownNillage) (City/Town/Village)L incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the ir'f. Clerk. (City/rownMllage) Dated at.S,+(,rI. .gue,Lrrtr;tyJ,County of C 1TTEND7e t and State of Vermont, (City/Town/Village Name) (County Name) this (C day of CTo ,A.D., .9 o 'i (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) BOARD OF (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) • (Setectman/Alderman?rustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) . ALDERMAN, or TRUSTEES (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of . (Cky/TownNillage Name) 6n:Iz :Tt4 .g't,1ZLir4(1 ,VERMONT OC_-'rc>. :4— t t , 2c� It (Cty/TownWillage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK 10i2-ON PAGE g1 OF THE L a"-i t> RECORDS (Book#) r-1 (Page#) OF THE -1- Y OF--� �6t�c-c �r� ON THE (� DAY OF (-Yr-c-)C -g'/ 2c t i , (CtylTownNiliage) (City/TownNillage Name) (Date-Day) (Dale-Month) c., t l , AT "T"ki�L--VE _O'CLOCK, .rid. (Date-Year) (Time) ,c4d,- ; (A or P) ATTEST: `fie (Clerk's Name) CLERK OF ,VERMONT (CitylrownNiliage) (City/Town/Village Name) Revision 12/2005 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL .I r(a V t C t`T i Clerk of the Lira of �Q's Name) �Q l�N l ..c..� , 4yl (City/Town/Village) (Clerk's Name) (City/Twat/Village) &U14 5;)1'r_.i i4( tD NI ,Vermont. (City/TownNilage Name) Pursuant to Title 19,V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C.l T-ssr. of 5'6"77 > c444Tu`•++ was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) (Cib%TowrNillage) r (City1TownNlllage Name) ., l� . OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on O( 0 i-5< " = i e (Month-Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning ra-r -VA %11/4•1 T RSA i Cw..i 0- Sc- <1 L Fern i ao 1ZS.:,!.,6 � � Iil.A�tvtt�tUi �i .i� 1--'A'rrt� t�A-\/-L-C ,14 L7 F•�l?i"2 r-t ) ' `.J W ti,ST / --r-i-r! S `r+...- A c c Sv..lG li20 i'A Ca 1 rtl A 140k2. = • S i Et 7 i. L kD 1•1 t l. L3 S 1-1.c ,! / =`s C Li"l e'4, F=c'.' '-T vJ i—>--i, A "P— ,Q, l,./s U S U ;� T of i,lnt6--tttx� dated and as shown on a Highway Map of the (�y�Illage) (City/Town/Village Name) 0G-C-a p I B , 2-0 l ,and filed in Book i0 2- on page 3i5-S of the Records of the (Year) (Book ) (Page#) c nth-Day) C:.ttY of �'�`{ `g��c.)r�,�'lbf� by the LLc.....ET`'i' Clerk of said C it.< (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNiilage Name) (City/TownNillage) (CityfTownNillage) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the (City/Town/Village)� D' Clerk. j Dated at&t..fri4 E„6ZLJt ; ,County of 6-4 ITTeN DcM and State of Vermont, C tyrr wnNiltage Name) (County Name) this 1 C day of `TD IZ. ,A.D., 'c- i t . BOARD (Date-Day) (Date•Month) (Date-Year) OF (Selectman/Aldermen/Trustee Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (SelectrtanrAldeman/Tnutee Signature) ALDERMAN, {Selectman/Alderr an/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) or TRUSTEES (Selectmen/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (SeleclnunlNderman/Trustee Sgnature) (Manager/Mayor Sgnature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of (Gty/rw+nNdlageNeme) ***************************,*************************************,:********,********************** 6nLCCI-01. t8 , 2cil TLC'•Name) E( t:r ,VERIVI®1�T (Month-Day) (Year) (C,ty/Townnniage Name) � HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS (1,2,3 or 4) RECORDS OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK{�71-ON PAGE�j3Z3 OF THE ! (Book#) ea. (Pager) tTY OF -gtyt2-,-4-teta/�1 ON THE 1 17 DAY OF dETC3F '- , OF THE (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (GtyAownNiltage) (C%'•rTownNllage Name) G 11 , AT -^t J---c. Nre-- > 1i O'CLOCK,(P A or PM. (Dale-Yea') (Time) e0 f? _ ATTEST: (Clerk's Name) • CLERK OF _,VERMONT (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNillage Name) Revision 1212005 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL p©tJ"A KiniVIL-E- , CiTY Clerk of the e—ir of (Cleric's Name) (City/Town/Village) (City/Town/Village) i)134 SUS'. /JAI(.7-11)IVJ , Vermont. (City/Town.iYlage Name) Pursuant to Title 19, V.S.A., Chapter 7, this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the CJT of S"o UM''EUZI-":,7ury was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3or4) (City/TownNillage) (Clty/TownMilageName) OPENED FOR PUBLIC !'RAVEL on Oc--r c:,a—ea- I c5 , Z�:.:i I . (Month•Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY: Beginning A r Tzi s tAtZ'cz--t?.s: �-no-1 c:o;= lnl00D-r7.1 .uDR4 . C. .'C( � , O r 4 -re 600-r--t S : Yam. v'= .50,-- i i t..t7 1?0ay`J A No ' - A`d�L___"„ (.L Sou-ii-{ A ip.r''tzvSCff✓,e-r `r- c - l_-iry Ls "i-- 17-`---t. y y.i�t�b ,-ti Fa C i.-la C-i..rc Lj1®`-.K\ ..b 1r-5ELr- / 4.,v t-r-r-+ .e 42'. o, tv, 0tc ,SC; Fs 6,.4--r- ) and as shown on a Highway Map of the C.11-1' of SCb1Z a-i#.LC 1'cz.! ,dated l ��i (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNillage Name) and filed in Book on page of the Records of the nth-Day) (Year) (8 #) (Page#) of , -t "�rJiac 'U, Ci`t'..i, ,J by the Y Clerk of said t .t (City/TownNillage) (city/Town/Village Name) (City/TownMilage) (City/Town/Village) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the Or"( Clerk. (CityTTownNtage) Dated at, ,•(,rty Et.xaft.intUrrA ,County of t-A tTTE,J i) M and State of Vermont, l (City/TownNillage Name)tC� �=rt2 (County Name) this P�r .. day of ,A.D., 2 r-D i. 1 (Date.Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) BOARD OF (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) ALDERMAN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Setectmarr/Aidenran/Trustee Signature) or TRUSTEES (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of . (City/TownNillage Name) LT-ir gulzU/sL& ,s_,VERMONT t ----?. i i i (City/TownNillage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS ' HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND r (1,2,3or4) i OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK 10gZON PAGE:4i- 5 OF THE LA t> RECORDS OF THE (_LrY OF-5 �',t>Sr,L4.6-tzst1 t6 i 0 (Paget) ON THE � DAY OF C��"Dg (Cty/TownMitlage) (City/r .g -t (Date-Day) (Date-Month) ...C)1,1 * AT ' L V V"T�J cc ` 'q<, € ' .M. (Date-Year) (Trine) f/f'ry 'or P) 8" ''TTEST: (Clerk's Name) • CLERK OF ,VERIVIONT (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNillage Name) Revision 12/2005 CPU r• �dr 00016227 V: 1032 PG: 323 • UIA 'tIoEEC'_ CITY CLERK 'S OFFICE WCO.DT414,1.S4 Received Oct 18,2011 02:00P Recorded in VOL: 1032 PG: 323 OF So. Burlington Land Records WARRANTY DEED D AttonnaKnvilleest = City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that It, HOMESTEAD DESIGN, INC., a Vermont Corporation with its place of business in Essex, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of the sum of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont Municipality located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents, does freely GIVE, GRANT,SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns forever, certain strips of land in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont(the"Property"), described as follows, viz: Being strips of land depicted as"Songbird Road", "Chickadee Circle", "Hummingbird Lane", "Woodthrush Circle" and"Proposed 10'Bike Path" on plats entitled: 1. "Final Plat (1 of 2)HEATHERFIELD, Dorset& Spear Streets, South Burlington, Vermont", FP-1, dated October 27, 2004, last revised January 13, 2006 and recorded in Map Slide 476, Map #5 of the South Burlington City Land Records (the"Final Plat (1)"); and 2. "Final Plat (2 of 2)HEATHERFIELD, Dorset& Spear Streets, South Burlington, Vermont", FP-2, dated October 27, 2004, last revised January 13, 2006 and recorded in Map Slide 476, Map#6 of the South Burlington City Land Records (the"Final Plat (2)") (together, (the Final Plat"). The above described Property is conveyed to Grantee for use as municipal roads, utility, stormwater drainage and recreation path purposes. This Deed shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey all public improvements on, over and under the Property, including but not limited to all roadway and recreation path improvements, sewer and water mains and appurtenances and stormwater pipes, catch basins, and appurtenances. By acceptance of this Warranty Deed, Grantee acknowledges that it has received the necessary as-built certifications and test results, and has performed the investigations it deems necessary to 1 00016227 V® 1032 PG= 324 1 ' accept the above-mentioned improvements in their"as is - where is" condition. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to Homestead Design, Inc. by Warranty Deed of JAM Properties, LLC, dated June 21, 2005 and recorded in Volume 715, Pages 178-179 of the South Burlington City Land Records. The Property is subject to (a)the terms and conditions of State of Vermont Discharge Permit# 3658-INDS, dated April 13, 2005; (b)the terms and conditions of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board's Findings of Fact and Decision dated August 3, 2004(effective August 9, 2004); (c) State of Vermont Discharge Permit No. 3658-INDC, dated (e)Department of the Army New England District, Corps of Engineers Permit#NAE-2004- 3233, dated April 13, 2005, (f) State of Vermont Land Use Permit Case No. 4C1141, dated May 13, 2005, (g) State of Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit Case No. WW-4-2169, dated May 11, 2005 and (h)all easements, restrictions and rights of way depicted on the Final Plat, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. §601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained, in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the Property, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto,to Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and Grantor HOMESTEAD DESIGN, INC. for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the Grantee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, Grantor is the sole owner of the Property and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid;that the Property is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as aforesaid; and it does hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. HOMESTEAD DESIGN, INC., b its duly authorized agent, has caused this instrument to be executed this.,a''day of ,2006. 2 • 00016227 tt s 1032 PG: 325 HOMESTEAD DESIGN, INC. By: Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Essex, in said County and State, this 46/-,717fday of 2006, personally appeared ,' je +,r2, a , Duly Authoriz Agent of HOMES i'hAD DESIGN, INC., and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of HOMES i'EAD DESIGN, INC. Before me, No Public My Commission Expires: 02/10/07 Vermont Proaerty Transrer Tax 32 V S_A_ Chaa 231 —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT— RETURN REC'D-TAX PAID BOARD OF HEALTH CERT. REC'D. VT LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'D Return No. Donna K.inville City Clerk Date Oct 'Et?011 3 CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL apt,I rid Kt ri1Jf L-Le CiTY Clerk of the Ltri of (Clerk's Name) (City/Town/Village) (CitylrownNillage) rn4 13Oj',..C.J/I&"rDf,1 ,Vermont. (City/Town> ilage Name) Pursuant to Title 19,V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C,1`l-q' of Sb+=rx'3ue.:. 4t;Tor\I was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNtllage Name) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on .o\i G M t 7 -2-- t> , 2 ci t ter.._ (Month-Day) (Year) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY:Beginning Q'r `1--e-. i to S `' tc j G'0-- \Ir 0-r-1.1.(" (1-1)rsi c..'CEn �"V,3)/ tc.7 r.t'Ti,(li t.4G' 6-AS-r A:4.t, .T 't2-mil t,-(., i.c2.-(--t 01'..t E iLt7 %0t R. 0'Rt � F-C)(z- AC.---(>1Z0'X.t /.A/Az-ram :-C eve'- ttr.ic./.1fa. fc; =r(- tki i-r-r-c ,N 2. C}. t"). c r^- C ..D F--""r— C -t-j_`) r �.,,,t tJ t r L .A--(- , . D ---/_D C.;.,.i. , and as shown on a Highway Map of the Ci of S'O(1Z tv ,dated (City/Town/Village) (City/TownNtl(age Name). j�u�.E,A A - i� 1. -0(2-- , and filed in Book t 11 E on page J4-7 . - of the Records of the (Month �Day) of (Year)3au� y (Book#) (Page#) lf...r-1 1 � 1r� c.arb�'Yt�4 b the �i t`t' Clerk of said C Irl' (City/TownNiilage) (City/TownNillage Name) (City/iownNiliage) (City/TownNillage) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the C.,z "$. Clerk. (City/rownMtage) Dated at, ,tirlcq irstiy+,County of Ci-i irreN 17a4 and State of Vermont, (City/Town/Village Name) (County Name) this I:-- day of Mb V&i 4 i? (Z,A.D., _, r 2_ • BOARD (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) OF (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) ' (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) v (SelectrroMA1derman/rrustee Signature) ALDERMAN, `fit or TRUSTEES (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/Town/Village of - (City/Town/Village Name) *********************************************************************irk************************ L"Tt4 .1S(JtaLONL R,N1 ,VERMONT OVE „ki&-ta 1 g 2C✓( 1. (Crtyrrow,Ntllage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4 OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK 1119 T ON PAGE t 1OF THE LA r.(t> RECORDS (Book#) (Page#) OF THE 0-i-"�Y OF- ' �(v�.c-ir (-to 4 ON THE 1 DAY OF 1\1OV A.,t1 ....:-( , (Crty/TownNiBage) (City/ (Date-Day) (Date-Month) ,till 2---; AT -T'i.ot.:,t.-v." P._.M. Tim (Date-Year) ( e) c) .TTEST: (Clerk's Name) CLERK OF ,VERMONT (CityrrownNillage) (City/Town/Village Name) Revision 12/2005 00022352 V: 1118 PG: 147 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS,that Buckthorn Group, LLC,a Vermont Limited Liability Company with its principal place of business located in the Town Williston, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont(the"Grantor"herein) in consideration of One Dollar, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, to them paid by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation situate in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, (the"Grantee"herein), hereby GIVES, GRANTS,SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, all right,title and interest in a certain piece of land with improvements thereon in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont,described as follows: Being a parcel of land comprised of 0.93 acres, more or less, lying easterly of Hinesburg Road in the City of South Burlington and which parcel is depicted and labeled as"Wildflower Drive"on a plat entitled"Final Plat, Sumerfield, 1404 Hinesburg Road,"dated June 24, 2009, last revised dated October 16,2009 and prepared by Krebs&Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the "Plat" herein). Being a part of the same land and premises conveyed to Buckthorn Group, LLC by Claire F. Lewis, Executrix of thg Estate of Robert J. Furlong, dated November 6, 2009, of record in Volume706—pages4t•''nof the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference may be had to the above-mentioned deeds and their records and to all prior deeds and their records in further aid of the description of the Iands of which the lands herein conveyed comprise a part. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, the City of South Burlington and its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever, and Buckthorn Group, LLC for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents Buckthorn Group, LLC is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey in manner aforesaid, that it is free from every encumbrance except as aforesaid, and does freely engage to warrant and defend the same against all lawful claims whatsoever, except as aforesaid. In witness whereof, Grantor sets its hand this G %lay of November , 20 e"2' CITY CLERK 'S OFFICE Received Nov 13t2012 02:20P Recorded in VOL: 1112 PG: 147—448 OF So. Burlington Lend Records Attest Donn Kinville Buckthorn Group, LLC City Clerk A 00022352 Va 1118 PG: 148 1 By: John R. 'Brien,Member and Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At.5 D4///f11m.i, Vermont,this L day of November,A.D. 204: ,John R. O'Brien personally appeared, and acknowledged this instrument, by him subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Buckthorn Group,LLC • Before Me: ` Notary Public "H. C'1S', DAVID H.CASIER 9 NOTARY PUBLIC +. TARP STATE OF VERMONT J.'. `1!BI-IC �- My Commission Expi e 7r� �o= February 10,20Z \OF VS5"- • Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32 V _S_A_ Chap 231 —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT— RETURN REC'D-TAX PAID BOARD OF HEALTH CERT. REC'D. VT LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'D Return No. Donny Yinville City Clerk Date Nov 13t2O12 ri END OF DOCUMENT CERTIFICATE of COMPLETION and OPENING of a HIGHWAY for PUBLIC TRAVEL D.OistA Kt r'1V i LLE , ejni Clerk of the e-mi of (Clerk's Name) (City/Town/Village) (City/Town/Village) S YTh1 Surzopl G-I ,Vermont. (CityfrownMtage Name) Pursuant to Title 19, V.S.A., Chapter 7,this is to certify that the following described section of Class 3 Highway in the C1 T`1; of Si)L,,iti 13.0 -'.`b& r was COMPLETED AND (1,2,3 or 4) (City/Town/Village) (City/Town/Village Name) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL on :�vU��-. �� "2 . (Month-Day) (Year) DEESCRIPTION OF RIGHT OF WAY:/ Beginning p i e� A t_L 1 l-i_._i e- , C 0 i.i-rt Ni U i nit.- / ,.T C 0,S�T •L,iQ, ' - (-ICJ i21a Akfk.---%,L.. Fc:12-- A DPP iy/t...4.4 A Tc-e .Y' ( 0 1 1 1 (--iNt::Ls2, . ai.- (- / t,v i-Ti-t A i2.O. Imo; •t-Di� (: t e-t -I—f�� -�-- �� (f,, �- j 'To T--tt- �vT-c �.L�'v,2 t.,+.•tUityv UkLTi1--L( 5-r0r,( ')LThi.t.t.4 L(.-tcE: , 11O�i - [L,„ is ,,,s. 2.. c_oi.L --i(200 fee j ot-- /try! r✓2Crs1-r rKiC, S-i-tZai i tp V Lc 5' -.1Q.,--t-t (,,- 5 ..ait?;z:1--kr,s"a r ca.:-( i 0 i.72_ 'i=, and as shown on a Highway Map of the e1 of Scxn'•t -'.a-tatter -cz l , dated (City/TownMltage) (City/Town/Village Name) ,and filed in Book on page of the Records of the c(c nth-Day) (Year) (Book#) (Page#) C: of S r-t Ia1.:f2t.lnlG1biJ by the CiTN. Clerk of said C..i r( (City/TownNiltage) (City/rownMtage Name) (City/Town/Village) (Clty/iownNrtlage) incorporated herein by reference and attested to on said map by said the Li7I`( Clerk. (Ctyffown thage) Dated at&,Ni,r(it} .g-a; .ir4t,r; ,County of 6-1iTTfc14 DeM and State of Vermont, (City/TownMilage Name) A (County Name) this day of v b(..)S'i- ,A.D., ... t L_ . (Date-Day) (Date-Month) (Date-Year) BOARD OF (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) (Selectm n/Aldemen/Trustee Signature) SELECTMEN, (Selactmac/Alder an/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) . ALDERMAN, or TRUSTEES (SeiectanrAlderan/Trustee Signature) (Selectman/Alderman/Trustee Signature) m m (Manager/Mayor Signature) and the Manager/Mayor of the City/TownNillage of (City/TownNi lage Name) *******************************************************************ale*****************lr********* 6ni-TTE r gunUI'[Lgb,! ,VERMONT A LX„vS-T , Zc_.i Z_-. (CtyTTownNAlage Name) (Month-Day) (Year) THE ABOVE IS A TRUE COPY OF THE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS > HIGHWAY COMPLETED AND (12,3 or 4) OPENED FOR PUBLIC TRAVEL,RECORDED IN BOOK ICgs ON PAGE 4`'3 OF THE LA r4 t> RECORDS (Book*) (Page#) OF THE CI irY OF-S t't ...1 :da.-f.4.4.tbtrstsi ON THE DAY OF Auc-'-0 —c , (Cty/TownN0lage) (City/Town (Date-Day) (Date-Month) .2 0/2 , AT —71,J� -VE P_.M. (Date-Year) (Time) P) /`-�_ TEST: " ;, (Clerk's Name) CLERK OF ,VERMONT (City/TownNillage) (City/Town/Village Name) Revision 12/2005 AA1LOt kL 60AO 00020683 V: 1095 PG: 40 WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that CITY OF BURLINGTON,a Vermont Municipal Corporation located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, ("Grantor"),in consideration of TEN AND MORE Dollars,paid to its full satisfaction by CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON,a Vermont municipal corporation located in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, ("Grantee"),hereby GIVES,GRANTS,SELLS,CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto said Grantee,CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, all right and title which Grantor, CITY OF BURLINGTON,and its successors and assigns have in,and to two certain parcels of land located in the City of South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows,viz: PARCEL ONE: City of Burlington Expansion of City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue Right of Way. Beginning at a point located on the easterly limit of the existing right of way for the City , of South Burlington street known as National Guard Avenue,said point is designated as SB2 on the plan entitled,"Final Plat,Lands owned by the City of Burlington,Located North and East of National Guard Avenue,"dated April 14,2011,and last revised June 28,2011,prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.,and recorded at Map Slide 561,Page 3,of the City of South Burlington Land Records; said point is also located N 60°48'00" W a distance of 1610.24 feet from a found concrete monument labeled CM 1 which is located on the northerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way,said point is also located N 65°49'27" E a distance of 50.39 feet from a found concrete monument labeled CM4 which is located on the westerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way,said point is also located N 23°59'58" W a distance of 906.73 feet from a found concrete monument labeled WHITE1 located on the northerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way, said point is also on the easterly limit of the new 66-foot wide right of way for the relocated portion of National Guard Avenue; thence proceeding N 14°17'59" W a distance of 34.82 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue to a point labeled LOT2C; thence proceeding N 24°01'17" W a distance of 76.03 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue to a point labeled LOT2B;thence proceeding N 30°22'02" W a distance of 99.82 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue to a point labeled LOT2A;thence proceeding N 39°45'40" W a distance of 145.37 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue to a point labeled SB3 on the westerly limit of Lot 2,said point is also on the easterly limit of the 60.00 foot wide right of way for Mountain View Boulevard;thence proceeding S 31°17'33" E a distance of 352.30 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue right of way to the point of beginning;the area of the above described parcel designated as Expansion of the City Right of Way (National Guard Avenue)is 0.11 acres,more or less,all bearings referenced in this description are based on the Vermont State Plane System Grid North. CITY CLERK 'S OFFICE Received Aus 0812012 11:15A Recorded in VOL: 1095 PG: 40 ^11.3 OF So. Burlington, Land Records Attest = 1 Lonna r.invilie City Clerk 00020683 V: 1095 PG: 41 PARCEL TWO: City of Burlington Right of Way for Relocated National Guard Avenue. Beginning at a point located on the easterly limit of the existing right of way for the City of South Burlington street known as National Guard Avenue, said point is designated as SB2 on the plan entitled "Final Plat,Lands owned by the City of Burlington, Located North and Fast of National Guard Avenue" dated April 14,2011,and last revised June 28,2011,and prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers,Inc.,and recorded at Map Slide 561,Page 3 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said point is also located N 60°48'00" W a distance of 1610.24 feet from a found concrete monument labeled CM I which is located on the northerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way,said point is also located N 65°49'27" E a distance of 50.39 feet from a found concrete monument labeled CM4 which is located on the westerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way, said point is also located N 23°59'58" W a distance of 906.73 feet from a found concrete monument labeled WHITE1 located on the northerly limit of the existing City of South Burlington National Guard Avenue right of way,said point is also on the easterly limit of the new 66-foot wide right of way for the relocated portion of National Guard Avenue; thence proceeding S 17°03'33" E a distance of 291.06 feet along the easterly limit of the existing National Guard Avenue to a point labeled LOTINW;thence proceeding easterly 342.61 feet along a circular curve sagging to the south having a radius of 333.00 feet to a point labeled PT2S on the above referenced plan, said curve has a chord with a length of 327.69 feet and a bearing of S82°19'46"E,said curve is along the southerly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and the northerly limit of Lot 1;thence proceeding N 68°11'39" E a distance of 138.00 feet along the southerly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to a point labeled PC3S on the northerly limit of Lot 1; thence proceeding easterly 745.53 feet along a circular curve sagging to the north having a radius of 546.46 feet to a point labeled PT3S, said curve has a chord with a length of 689.04 feet and a bearing of S72°43'16"E, said curve is along the southerly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and on the northerly limit of Lot 1;thence proceeding S 33°38'13" E a distance of 230.71 feet along the southwesterly limit of said relocated National Guard Road to a point labeled PC4S on the easterly limit of Lot I; thence proceeding southeasterly 97.14 feet along a circular curve sagging to the southwest having a radius of 272.99 feet to a point labeled LOT1SE, said curve has a chord with a length of 96.63 feet and a bearing of S43°49'47"E,said curve is along the southwesterly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and on the easterly limit of Lot 1;thence proceeding N 84°54'14" E a distance of 19.58 feet along the existing northerly National Guard Avenue right of way limit to a point labeled RD4A;thence proceeding S 73°55'l 1" E a distance of 254.62 feet along the existing northerly National Guard Avenue right of way limit to a point labeled RD3; thence proceeding N 51°25'45" W a distance of 40.71 feet along the easterly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to a point labeled NEROW1 on the southerly limit of Lot 2; thence proceeding N 64°18'15" W a distance of 179.47 feet along the easterly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to a point labeled PT4N on the southerly limit of Lot 2;thence proceeding westerly 110.78 feet along a circular curve sagging to the southwest having a radius of 206.99 feet to a point labeled PC4N, said curve has a chord with a length of 109.46 feet and a bearing of N 48°58'16"W, said curve is along the 2 00020683 V: 1095 PG® 42 northeasterly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and on the southerly limit of Lot 2;thence proceeding N 33°38'13" W a distance of 230.71 feet along the easterly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to a point labeled PT3N on the southerly limit of Lot 2;thence proceeding westerly 835.57 feet along a circular curve sagging to the north having a radius of 612.46 feet to a point labeled PC3N, said curve has a chord with a length of 772.26 feet and a bearing of N 72°43'16"W, said curve is along the northerly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and on the southerly limit of Lot 2;thence proceeding S 68°11'39" W a distance of 138.00 feet along the northerly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to a point labeled PT2N on the southerly limit of Lot 2;thence proceeding westerly 438.63 feet along a circular curve sagging to the south having a radius of 267.00 feet to point labeled POC2N, said curve has a chord with a length of 390.95 feet and a bearing of N 64°44'26"W, said curve is along the northerly limit of the new 66.00 foot wide relocated right of way for National Guard Avenue and on the southerly limit of Lot 2; thence proceeding N 18°51'30" W a distance of 99.21 feet along the easterly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue to the point of beginning on the westerly limit of Lot 2; the area of the above described parcel designated as New City Right of Way(Relocated National Guard Avenue)is 2.63 acres,more or less,all bearings referenced in this description are based on the Vermont State Plane System Grid North. Included in this conveyance are all water,stormwater and sewer lines,and the respective drains,valves,connections,pipes and appurtenances related to said water,stormwater or sewer lines located under or within the above described parcel of land,together with all curbing and sidewalks, if any. Also included in this conveyance is an irregularly shaped easement to Grantee for stormwater drainage purposes of 0.51 acres,more or less,extending northerly and easterly from on the northerly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue. The southerly boundary of said stormwater easement area begins on the northerly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue at a point approximately 382.32 feet easterly from a point labeled PC3N,runs for approximately 275.59 feet easterly along the northerly limit of said relocated National Guard Avenue and ends at a point approximately 175.96 feet westerly of a point labeled PT3N,all as shown on the above-referenced plan. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments,the records thereof and the references therein contained,all in further aid of this description. Notice of permit requirements. In order to comply with applicable state Rules concerning potable water supplies and wastewater systems,a person shall not construct or erect any structure or building on the lot of land described in this deed if the use or useful occupancy of that structure or building will require the installation of or connection to a potable water supply or wastewater system,without first complying with the applicable Rules and obtaining any required permit. Any person who owns this property acknowledges that this lot may not be able to meet state standards for a potable water supply or wastewater system and therefore this lot may not be able to be improved. 3 00020683 Vs 1095 PG= 43 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises,with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof,to the said Grantee,CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON,its successors and/or assigns,to its own use and behoof forever;And it,the said Grantor,CITY OF BURLINGTON,for itself and its successors and assigns,does covenant with the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON,its successors and/or assigns,that until the ensealing of these presents,it is the sole owner of the premises and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid and that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE,except as stated above;and it does hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as stated above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Grantor,by and through its duly authorized agent and sole h� GG i member,hereunto sets its hand and seal this 16 day of vt ,2012. IN PRESENCE OF: CITY OF BURLINGTON By: Gil ' Witness Miro Weinberger,M or, Duly Au orized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN,SS. At ,Vermont, in said County,this / day of �V' , 201 before me personally Weinberger,dulyauthorized agent of CITY OFURLINGTO P Y PP g � g N+ and acknowledged the foregoing instrument,by him, sealed and subscribed,to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of CITY OF BURLINGTON. Before me T UBLIC, O My Co sion Expires: .1-(I VerrDnt PrDperts Transfer Tax j 32 V.S.A. Chap 231 —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-- RETURN ROVNitiOnililaterfogInue Deed FINAL 2012.doc oc HEALTH CERT, REC'D. VT LAND USE & CEVEL 0F91ENT PLANS ACT. CERT. REC'C ReE Jr; Donna ravineCi` CIe ND OF DOCUMENT Date Aa4 08,2012 south bur , i VttMONT MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-06 (201 Allen Road) DATE: February 4, 2013 City Council meeting This is a continued public hearing from January 7, 2012. The Council requested additional soil information on the property. Attached is the Vermont Soil Fact Sheet-Detailed Definitions and Explanations, submitted by the applicant for review. Staff is also attaching for your reference, the Farmland Classification Systems for Vermont Soils,USDA,NRCS,June 2006,which contains some of the same information as the Soil Fact Sheet but does include some additional detail. Staff is also including specific fact sheets describing the four main soils on the property for your information. The application involves a 40 unit planned unit development(phase 1 of 71 unit project)at 201 Allen Road. The parcel is located in the Residential 1 and Residential 2 zoning districts. Our understanding is Skip McClellan from Llewellyn-Howley, Inc. will be in attendance at the public hearing on Monday. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations General Information The Vermont Soil Fact Sheet was developed to organize a variety of data about a particular soil map unit on one page. Vermont Important Farmland Classification Important Farmland ratings help to identify soil map units that represent the best land for producing food, feed,fiber,forage, and oilseed crops. Important Farmland inventories identify soil map units that are Prime Farmland,Additional Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Additional Farmland of Local Importance Prime Farmland(Prime) The national definition of Prime Farmland was modified to include information that applies to soils in Vermont. The national definition can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations(7CFR657). Soil map units are Prime Farmland if they have the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed fiber, forage, and oilseed crops and are also available for these uses. The present land use may be cropland, pasture, forestland, or other land uses, but not urban and built-up or water. Location, tract size, and accessibility to markets and support industries are not considered when making a Prime Farmland determination. Prime Farmland has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to economically produce sustained high yields of crops when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. These soils have an adequate and dependable water supply from precipitation, a favorable temperature and growing season, acceptable acidity or alkalinity, and few or no surface stones or boulders. They are permeable to water and air, are not excessively erodible or saturated with water for a long period of time, and don't flood frequently or are protected from flooding. To qualify as a Prime Farmland soil map unit,the dominant soils must meet all of the following conditions: *Soil temperature and growing season are favorable. *Soil moisture is adequate to sustain commonly grown crops throughout the growing season in 7 or more years out of 10. *Water moves readily through the soil and root-restricting layers are absent within 20 inches of the surface. * Less than 10 percent of the surface layer consists of rock fragments larger than 3 inches in diameter. *The soils are neither too acid nor too alkaline for, or the soils respond readily to additions of lime. *The soils are not frequently flooded(less often than once in 2 years)and have no water table, or the water table can be maintained at a sufficient depth during the growing season for the growth of commonly grown crops. *Slope is favorable(generally less than 8 percent)and the soils are not subject to serious erosion. *The soils are typically deep(greater than 40 inches to bedrock), but include moderately deep soils(20 to 40 inches)with adequate available water capacity. Additional Farmland of Statewide Importance(Statewide) This is land, in addition to Prime Farmland,that is of Statewide importance for the production of food, feed,fiber,forage, and oilseed crops. In Vermont, criteria for defining and delineating Statewide Important Farmland was determined by the appropriate state agencies,working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The dominant soils, in these soil map units, have limitations resulting from one or more of the following: * Excess slope and erosion hazard, USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 1 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Vermont Important Farmland Classification *Excess wetness or slow permeability, *A flooding hazard, *Shallow depth (less than 20 inches)to bedrock or other layers that limit the rooting zone and available water capacity, *Moderately low to very low available water capacity. Additional Farmland of Local Importance(Local) In some areas, there is a need to identify additional farmlands for the production of food, feed,fiber, forage, and oilseed crops that has not been identified by the other categories in the Important Farmland system. These lands can be identified as Additional Farmland of Local Importance by the appropriate local agencies. In places,Additional Farmlands of Local Importance may include tracts of land that have been designated for agriculture by local ordinance. In Vermont, a few soil map units in certain counties have been identified as Additional Farmland of Local Importance. The local Natural Resources Conservation Districts made these designations,with assistance from local NRCS personnel and concurrence by the State Conservationist. For many soil map units on less than 15 percent slope that are somewhat poorly drained to very poorly drained the major limiting factors that need to be overcome are surface stones that cover 0.1 to 3.0 percent of the surface and wetness. However, many of these areas may have never been cleared of surface stones because the wetness limitation was too difficult to overcome. NPSL. stands for"Not Prime, Statewide, or Local"and replaces"not rated" Important Farmland Determinations An Important Farmland classification of Prime, Statewide, Local is assigned to soil map units based on the characteristics of the dominant soils in the soil map unit. Determinations of unique are based on the specific crop and are not directly related to the soil map unit. In most cases, Important Farmland determinations are made on a soil map unit basis. They are never made for individual components of a soil map unit. For example, if the area in question is a delineation of a Prime soil map unit the whole area is considered Prime regardless of any map unit inclusions within the delineation. The Important Farmland designation of individual delineation's of a soil map unit can't be changed without an onsite investigation and a change in the official copy of the soil map where the area is located. This would only occur after an evaluation of a representative sample of all delineation's of the specific soil map unit within the soil survey area. There are exceptions. Prime, Statewide, and Local soil map units can't be urban or buildup. A delineation of a Prime, Statewide, or Local soil map unit,which has been converted to urban or build up, should no longer be considered Important Farmland. The delineation should be changed to an appropriate soil map unit on the official copy of the soil map. Delineations of some soil map units that are Prime, Statewide, or Local have a wetness, bedrock, or slope limitation. These soil map units are footnoted in the soil surveys legends at the end of this report. It is assumed that delineations of these map units are Prime, Statewide, or Local unless an onsite determines that the delineation should not be Important Farmland. A determination that the delineation is not Important Farmland doesn't require that change is made in the soil map unit symbol. See the FOOTNOTES section for more details. The following are used: FOOTNOTE"a"-If the upper slope class limit of the soil map unit is between 9 and 15 percent then the areas of the soil map unit that exceed 8 percent slope don't qualify as Prime, Statewide, or Local. If the upper slope class limit exceeds 15 percent then the areas of the soil map unit that exceed 15 percent slope don't qualify as Important Farmland. USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 2 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Vermont Important Farmland Classification FOOTNOTE"b"-The soils in this soil map unit have a wetness limitation that may be difficult and/or unfeasible to over come. Areas of this soil map unit don't qualify as Prime, Statewide,or Local, if artificial drainage is not feasible. FOOTNOTE"c' -Bedrock outcrops commonly cover more than 2 percent of the surface.Areas of this soil map unit will not qualify as Prime, Statewide, or Local, if bedrock outcrops are extensive enough to prohibit efficient farming. Vermont Agricultural Value Group Agricultural value groups are a land classification system that can be used to compare the"relative value"for crop production of one soil map unit to another. They can be a useful tool in administering national, state, and local land use programs and regulations. Soil map units were placed in their respective Agricultural Value Groups assuming that it was feasible to apply the corrective measures needed to overcome the soil limitations identified in the soil potential study. Soil map units associated with bedrock or wetness are identified by footnotes, defined in the section Footnotes, and are listed on the soil survey legends. Users of this report are encouraged to consider the footnotes and the need for on-site investigations. Agricultural Value Groups Descriptions Agricultural Value Groups consist of soil map units that have similar characteristics, limitations, management requirements, and potential for crop production. Soil map units in Group 1 have the most potential for crop production and soil map units in Groups 11 and 12 have the least potential for crop production. The description and makeup of the Agricultural Value Groups are as follows: 1 —These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Prime. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 1 or 2. Their relative value is 100. 2—These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2. Their relative value is 97. 3—These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Prime. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2 or 3. Their relative value is 84. 4—These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2, 3, or 4. Their relative value is 82. 5-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 3. Their relative value is 69. 6-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2, 3, or 4. Their relative value is 63. 7-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 3. Their relative value is 57. 8-These soil map units have limitations for crop production that can be overcome. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 4 or 6. Low crop yields, low available water capacity, and erosion hazard tend to be the major limitations. This group includes a few soil map units that have an Important Farmland rating of Local. Their relative value is 52. 9-These soil map units have limitations that are difficult to overcome and they are usually considered to be unsuitable for crop production. Limiting factors can include but are not limited to slope,wetness, surface stones, and bedrock outcrops. On-site investigations are strongly recommended to determine the feasibility of installing corrective measures and using these soils for crop production. If the user determines, that corrective measures can't be installed then the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Normally, the cost of overcoming corrective measures and laws governing the installation of corrective measures should not be considered when making this determination. In some situations, if laws prevent the installation of corrective measures, the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 3 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Vermont Agricultural Value Group Class 5, 6, or 7.Their relative value is 43. 10-These soil map units have limitations are very difficult to overcome and they are usually considered to be unsuitable for crop production. Limiting factors can include but are not limited to slope, wetness, surface stones, and bedrock outcrops. They can be used as cropland only after intensive and expensive installation of various corrective measures. On-site investigations are strongly recommended to determine feasibility of installing corrective measures and using these soils for crop production. . If the user determines,that corrective measures can't be installed then the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Normally, the cost of overcoming corrective measures and laws governing the installation of corrective measures should not be considered when making this determination. In some situations, if laws prevent the installation of corrective measures, the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 5, 6, or 7. Their relative value is 22. 11-These soil map units are considered to have very limited potential for crop production. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 7 or 8. Only in rare situations, and usually after great expense, are these soil map units converted for crop production.Their relative value is 0. 12-These soil map units are areas within a digitized or published soil survey that have never been mapped because of restricted access or the policy on mapping urban areas that was in place at the time. An onsite should be conducted to determine if areas of these soil map units should be assigned to a different Agricultural Value Group. No relative value is assigned. FOOTNOTE "d"-The soils in this soil map unit have a wetness limitation that may not be feasible to over come.Areas of this soil map unit,where artificial drainage is not feasible should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. FOOTNOTE "e"- Bedrock outcrops cover more than 2 percent of the surface. Areas of this soil map unit should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11, if bedrock outcrops are extensive enough to prohibit efficient farming. Possible Uses Agricultural Value Groups and relative values may be useful in many state and local programs, including: * design and implementation of Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment(LESA)systems; * implementation of Public Law 97-98,the Farmland Protection Policy Act(FPPA); * rating of agricultural soils for appraisal under Vermont's Use Value Program of Agricultural and Forest Land; * rating of agricultural soils for appraisal under Town Tax Stabilization Programs; * assessment of agricultural soils by land trusts, landowners, bankers, realtors; and * broad resource planning by state agencies and town and regional planning commissions. Vermont Residential On-site Waste Disposal Group This information identifies the rev,onsite sewage disposal class and footnote of the map unit. Ratings are based on Vermont Environmental Protection Rules,August 16, 2002, based on 20%maximum slope—for lots created on or after June 14, 2002. It doesn't replace onsite investigation. These are the five major classes. Class I -WELL SUITED Class II -MODERATELY SUITED Class III -MARGINALLY SUITED USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 4 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Vermont Residential On-site Waste Disposal Group Class IV-NOT SUITED Class V-NOT RATED The combination of class and footnote provides information on the major soil properties affecting the class assignment. A brief summary of the ratings groups follows. (For more detailed information on the individual classes, see Appendix A.) la-WELL SUITED-Soil map units with rapid permeability lb-WELL SUITED-Soil map units with rapid permeability and limited slope lc-WELL SUITED-Soil map units with moderate permeability Id-WELL SUITED-Soil map units with moderate permeability and limited slope Ila-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with slow permeability Ilb-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with slow permeability and limited slope Ilc-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with moderate depth to bedrock Ild-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with moderate depth to bedrock and limited slope Ile-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with rapid permeability and steep slope Ilf-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with moderate permeability and steep slope Ilg-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with flooding limitation Ilh-MODERATELY SUITED-Soil map units with moderate depth to seasonal high water table(SHWT) llla-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with marginal depth to bedrock Illb-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with flooding limitation and moderate depth to SHWT IIIc-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with marginal depth to SHWT and gentle slope IIId-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with marginal depth to SHWT and moderate slope Ille-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with marginal depth to SHWT and limited slope IIIf-MARGINALLY SUITED-Soil map units with SHWT and depth to bedrock limitation IVa-NOT SUITED-Soil map units not suited due to excessive wetness IVb-NOT SUITED-Soil map units not suited due to limited depth to bedrock and steep slope IVc-NOT SUITED-Soil map units not suited due to very limited depth to bedrock on moderate slopes IVd-NOT SUITED-Soil map units not suited due to slow permeability and steep slope V- NOT RATED MAP UNITS Physical and Chemical Properties This table shows estimates of some physical and chemical characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam,"for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Clay as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. The estimated clay content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of sand, silt, and clay affects the physical behavior of a soil. Particle size is important for engineering and agronomic interpretations,for determination of soil hydrologic qualities, and for soil classification. The amount and kind of clay affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil and the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat), plasticity,the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. Soil reaction(pH)is a measure of acidity or alkalinity. It is important in selecting crops and other plants, in evaluating soil amendments for fertility and stabilization, and in determining the risk of corrosion. USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 5 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Physical and Chemical Properties Saturated hydraulic conductivity refers to the ability of a soil to transmit water or air. The term"permeability"indicates saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat). The estimates in the table indicate the rate of water movement, in inches per hour, when the soil is saturated. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Organic matter is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. The estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained by returning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter has a positive effect on available water capacity,water infiltration, soil organism activity, and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops and soil organisms. Erosion factors are shown in the table as the K factor(Kw and Kf)and the T factor. Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation(USLE)and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation(RUSLE)to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and Ksat. Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments. Erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine-earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. Erosion factor T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind and/or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. Water Features This table gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential,soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Water table refers to a saturated zone in the soil. The water features table indicates depth to the top(upper limit)of the saturated zone in most years. Estimates of the upper limits are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles(redoximorphic features)in the soil.A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. USDA Natural Resources �—� Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 6 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Water Features Duration and frequency are estimated. Duration is expressed as extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours, very brief if 4 hours to 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, very rare, rare, occasional, frequent, and very frequent. None means that flooding is not probable; very rare that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions(the chance of flooding is less than 1 percent in any year); rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions(the chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions(the chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); frequent that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions(the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50 percent in all months in any year); and very frequent that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions(the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of any year). The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and little or no horizon development. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. Soil Features Hydric Soil? The three essential characteristics of wetlands are hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Criteria for each of the characteristics must be met for areas to be identified as wetlands. Undrained hydric soils that have natural vegetation should support a dominant population of ecological wetland plant species. Hydric soils that have been converted to other uses should be capable of being restored to wetlands. Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils(NTCHS)as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. These soils are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established. These criteria are used to identify a phase of a soil series that normally is associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties that are described in"Soil Taxonomy"(Soil Survey Staff, USDA, 1999)and in the"Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey Staff, USDA, 1993). If soils are wet enough for a long enough period to be considered hydric,they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field. These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite determinations of hydric soils in this survey area are specified in"Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States"(USDA, NRCS, 2002). (A separate guide, "Field Indicators for Identifying Hydric Soils in New England,"is also available. Please consult with the State Wetlands Office for more information.) Hydric soils are identified by examining and describing the soil to a depth of about 20 inches. This depth may be greater if determination of an appropriate indicator so requires. It is always recommended that soils be excavated and described to the depth necessary for an understanding of the redoximorphic processes. Using the completed soil descriptions, soil scientists can then compare the soil features required by each indicator and specify which indicators have been matched with the conditions observed in the soil.The soil can be identified as a hydric soil if at least one of the approved indicators is present. This survey can be used to locate probable areas of hydric soils. Soil components with a value of"yes" meet the definition of hydric soils and, in addition, have at least one of the hydric soil indicators. This rating can help in planning land uses; however, onsite investigation is recommended to determine the hydric soils on a specific site. USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 7 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Soil Features Depth to Bedrock This table gives estimates of depth to a bedrock layer, if bedrock is a restrictive feature normally associated with the soil.The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Depth to top is the vertical distance from the soil surface to the upper boundary of the restrictive layer. The Land Capability Classification system shows the suitability of soils for most agricultural uses. Soils are grouped according to their limitations for agricultural crops, the risk of damage when they are used, and the way they respond to management. The grouping does not consider major, and generally expensive, landforming activities that would change slope,depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor does it consider major land reclamation projects. Soils are grouped at three levels: capability class, subclass, and unit. Classes and subclasses have been used in this study. Capability classes are designated by Roman numerals I through VIII in older soil survey reports, and by Arabic numerals 1 through 8 in newer soil survey reports. The numerals indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are not likely to erode but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that limit their use. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for crop production. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for crop production. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous land areas have limitations that nearly prelude their use for crop production. Capability subclasses indicate the major kinds of limitations within each capability class. Within most capability classes there can be up to four subclasses. Adding a small letter e,w, s, or c,to the class numeral indicates the subclass. An example is 2e. The letter e represents a risk of erosion, w means that water in or on the soil will interfere with plant growth or crop production, s represents a shallow,droughty, or surface stoniness limitation, and c represents a climate limitation that is very cold or very dry. Land Use Limitations This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect dwellings with basements and pond reservoir areas. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building site development. Slight indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. Moderate indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Severe indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 8 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Land Use Limitations Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings with basements,the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of about 7 feet. The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs.The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility(shrink-swell potential), and compressibility. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification. The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, slope,depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. Pond reservoir areas hold water behind a dam or embankment. Soils best suited to this use have low seepage potential in the upper 60 inches. The seepage potential is determined by the saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat)of the soil and the depth to fractured bedrock or other permeable material. Excessive slope can affect the storage capacity of the reservoir area. Agricultural Yield Data The average yields per acre that can be expected of the principal crops under a high level of management are shown in the crop yield table. In any given year, yields may be higher or lower than those indicated in the table because of variations in rainfall and other climatic factors.The land capability classification of the soil component(s)in the map unit is shown just above the yield data. The yields are based mainly on the experience and records of farmers, conservationists, and extension agents. Available yield data from nearby counties and results of field trials and demonstrations also are considered. The management needed to obtain the indicated yields of the various crops depends on the kind of soil and the crop. Management can include drainage,erosion control, and protection from flooding;the proper planting and seeding rates; suitable high-yielding crop varieties; appropriate and timely tillage; control of weeds, plant diseases, and harmful insects; favorable soil reaction and optimum levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and trace elements for each crop; effective use of crop residue, barnyard manure, and green manure crops; and harvesting that ensures the smallest possible loss. The estimated yields reflect the productive capacity of each soil for each of the principal crops. Yields are likely to increase as new production technology is developed. The productivity of a given soil compared with that of other soils, however, is not likely to change. Crops other than those shown in the crop yield table are grown in the survey area, but estimated yields are not listed because the acreage of such crops is small. The local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service or of the Cooperative Extension Service can provide information about the management and productivity of the soils for those crops. Woodland Management This table can help forest owners or managers plan the use of soils for wood crops. Erosion hazard is the probability that damage will occur as a result of site preparation and cutting where the soil is exposed along roads, skid trails, and fire lanes and in log-handling areas. Forests that have been burned or overgrazed are also subject to erosion. Ratings of the erosion hazard are based on the percent of the slope.A rating of slight indicates that no particular prevention measures are needed under ordinary conditions.A rating of moderate indicates that erosion-control measures are needed in certain silvicultural activities.A rating of severe indicates that special precautions are needed to control erosion in most silvicultural activities. Equipment limitation reflects the characteristics and conditions of the soil that restrict use of the equipment generally needed in woodland management or harvesting.The chief characteristics and conditions considered in the ratings are slope,stones on the surface, rock outcrops, soil wetness, and texture of the surface layer.A rating of slight indicates that under normal conditions the kind of equipment and season of use are not significantly restricted by soil factors. Soil wetness can restrict equipment use, but the wet period does not exceed 1 month.A rating of moderate indicates that equipment use is moderately restricted because of one or more soil factors. If the soil is wet,the wetness restricts equipment use for a period of 1 to 3 months. A rating of severe indicates USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 9 Vermont Soil Fact Sheet- Detailed Definitions and Explanations Woodland Management that equipment use is severely restricted either as to the kind of equipment that can be used or the season of use. If the soil is wet, the wetness restricts equipment use for more than 3 months. Windthrow hazard is the likelihood that trees will be uprooted by the wind because the soil is not deep enough for adequate root anchorage. The main restrictions that affect rooting are a seasonal high water table and the depth to bedrock, a fragipan, or other limiting layers.A rating of slight indicates that under normal conditions no trees are blown down by the wind. Strong winds may damage trees, but they do not uproot them.A rating of moderate indicates that some trees can be blown down during periods when the soil is wet and winds are moderate or strong. A rating of severe indicates that many trees can be blown down during these periods. Potential productivity of merchantable or common trees on a soil is expressed as a site index. The site index is the average height, in feet, that dominant and codominant trees of a given species attain in a specified number of years. The site index applies to fully stocked, even-aged, unmanaged stands. Commonly grown trees are those that forest managers generally favor in intermediate or improvement cuttings. They are selected on the basis of growth rate, quality, value, and marketability. More detailed information regarding site index is available in the"National Forestry Manual,"which is available in local offices of the Natural Resources Conservation Service or on the Internet. Contacting Support Questions about the Vermont Soil Fact Sheets should be directed to Martha Stuart, Vermont soils dataset manager. Email: martha.stuart@vt.usda.gov Phone: 802-295-7942 ext 28 For a copy of the report titled"Farmland Classification Systems for Vermont Soils", dated April,2003, contact: Stephen H. Gourley, State Soil Scientist 356 Mountain View Drive Suite 105 Colchester,VT 05446 802-951-6796 ext. 236 Steve.Gourley@vt.usda.gov USDA Natural Resources Template Database Version:29 Conservation Service SSURGO Version:2.1 Page 10 Farmland Classification Systems for Vermont Soils June,2006 United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service .7 The United States Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race,color,national origins,sex,religion,age,disability, political beliefs and marital status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information(Braille,large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact the USDA Office of Communications at(202)720-5881 (voice)or(202)720-8909(TDD). To file a complaint,write the Secretary of Agriculture,US Department of Agriculture, Washington,DC,20250 or call(202)720-7327(voice)or(202 720-1127(TDD). USDA is an equal employment employer. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 IMPORTANT FARMLANDS 1 Prime Farmland Unique Farmland Additional Farmland of Statewide Importance Additional Farmland of Local Importance Important Farmland Determinations Act 250- PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS AND PRODUCTIVE FOREST SOILS 5 Criteria 9B - Primary Agricultural Soils Criteria 9C -Productive Forest Soils Primary Agricultural Soils and Productive Forest Soils Determinations AGRICULTURAL VALUE GROUPS 6 Preparation of Agricultural Value Groups Relative Values Results Interpretation and Use Definitions DIGITAL INFORMATION 13 FOOTNOTES 13 CONTACT INFORMATION 15 Table 1. Agricultural value groups of Vermont by Important Farmland Rating, acres, percentage of state land area, and Relative Value 16 Table 2. Status of soil surveys in Vermont 17 Cover photo of Addison County, Vermont,from Mt. Defiance, NY, by Steve Gourley INTRODUCTION This report describes several farmland classification systems in use in Vermont. It provides information that can be used in making Important Farmland evaluations and ACT 250 Primary Agricultural Soils(criteria 9B)and Productive Forest Soils(criteria 9C)evaluations. This edition updates the definitions of ACT 250 Primary Agricultural Soils (criteria 9B)and Productive Forest Soils (criteria 9C)that were signed into law in May, 2006. NRCS soil mapping is still ongoing in several counties in the Northeast Kingdom(see table 2). The information for these ongoing surveys is subject to change. IMPORTANT FARMLANDS Important Farmland ratings help to identify soil map units that represent the best land for producing food,feed, fiber,forage, and oilseed crops. Important Farmland inventories identify soil map units that are Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,Additional Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Additional Farmland of Local Importance. Important Farmland ratings are listed under each county's folder in the electronic Field Office Technical Guide (eFOTG),on county Soil Fact Sheets, and on Vermont Important Farmlands CD. Important farmland maps can be downloaded from the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.usda.gov) for most counties in Vermont. Prime Farmland (Prime) The national definition of Prime Farmland was modified to include information that applies to soils in Vermont. The national definition can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations(7CFR657). Soil map units are Prime Farmland if they have the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed fiber, forage, and oilseed crops and are also available for these uses. The present land use may be cropland,pasture, forestland, or other land uses, but not urban and built-up or water. Location,tract size, and accessibility to markets and support industries are not considered when making a Prime Farmland determination. Prime Farmland has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to economically produce sustained high yields of crops when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. These soils have an adequate and dependable water supply from precipitation, a favorable temperature and growing season, acceptable acidity or alkalinity, and few or no surface stones or boulders. They are permeable to 1 water and air, are not excessively erodible or saturated with water for a long period of time,and don't flood frequently or are protected from flooding. To qualify as a Prime Farmland soil map unit,the dominant soils must meet all of the following conditions: • Soil temperature and growing season are favorable. • Soil moisture is adequate to sustain commonly grown crops throughout the growing season in 7 or more years out of 10. • Water moves readily through the soil and root-restricting layers are absent within 20 inches of the surface. • Less than 10 percent of the surface layer consists of rock fragments larger than 3 inches in diameter. • The soils are neither too acid nor too alkaline, or the soils respond readily to additions of lime. • The soils are not frequently flooded(less often than once in 2 years)and have no water table, or the water table can be maintained at a sufficient depth during the growing season to allow for the growth of commonly grown crops. • Slope is favorable (generally less than 8 percent) and the soils are not subject to serious erosion. • The soils are typically deep (greater than 40 inches to bedrock),but include moderately deep soils (20 to 40 inches)with adequate available water capacity. Unique Farmland (Unique) There is currently no Unique Farmland identified in Vermont. Unique Farmland is land other than Prime Farmland that is used for the production of specific high value food and fiber crops. It has the special combination of soil quality, location, growing season, and moisture supply needed to economically produce sustained high quality and/or high yields of a specific crop when treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. Specific characteristics of Unique Farmland are: • It is used for high value food or fiber. 2 • Has a moisture supply that is adequate for the specific crop. The supply is from stored moisture,precipitation, or a developed irrigation system. • Combines favorable factors of soil quality, growing season,temperature, humidity, air drainage,elevation, aspect,or other conditions, such as nearness to market,that favor the growth of a specific food or fiber crop. Many crops that could fall under the definition of Unique Farmland are currently grown on Prime or Statewide soil map units. Other crops such as maple sugarbushes are commonly grown on soil map units in Agricultural Value Groups 8, 9, and 10,on land that is not Important Farmland. For more information about the status of Unique Farmland in Vermont, see the contacts listed below. Additional Farmland of Statewide Importance(Statewide) This is land in addition to Prime and Unique Farmland that is of Statewide importance for the production of food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. In Vermont, criteria for defining and delineating Farmland of Statewide Importance was determined by the appropriate state agencies,working with the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The dominant soils in these soil map units have limitations resulting from one or more of the following conditions: • Excessive slope and erosion hazard, •Excessive wetness or slow permeability, •A flooding hazard, • Shallow depth(less than 20 inches)to bedrock or to other layers that limit the rooting zone and available water capacity, •Moderately low to very low available water capacity. Additional Farmland of Local Importance(Local) In some areas,there is a need to identify additional farmland for the production of food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops that has not been identified by the other categories in the Important Farmland system. These lands can be identified as Additional Farmland of Local Importance by the appropriate local agencies. In places,Additional Farmland of Local Importance may include tracts of land that have been designated for agriculture by local ordinance. 3 In Vermont, a few soil map units in some counties have been identified as Additional Farmland of Local Importance. Soil map units in Agricultural Value Group 8 could potentially be Additional Farmland of Local Importance. These soil map units have limitations for crop production that can be overcome. Many areas of these soil map units are currently being used for hay or pasture. The local Natural Resources Conservation Districts make these designations,with assistance from local NRCS personnel and concurrence by the NRCS State Conservationist. The following soil map units are considered Additional Farmland of Local Importance: Addison County Adams Loamy Fine Sand, 5 To 12 Percent Slopes Colton Gravelly Sandy Loam, 5 To 12 Percent Slopes Raynham Silt Loam, 6 To 12 Percent Slopes Franklin County Missisquoi Loamy Sand, 8 To 15 Percent Slopes Rutland County Adams Loamy Fine Sand, 8 To 15 Percent Slopes Hinckley Gravelly Loamy Fine Sand, 8 To 15 Percent Slopes Windsor Loamy Sand, 8 To 15 Percent Slopes Important Farmland Determinations for USDA programs An Important Farmland classification of Prime, Statewide,or Local is assigned to soil map units based on the characteristics of the dominant soils in the soil map unit. Determinations of Unique are based on the specific crop and are not directly related to the soil map unit. In most cases, Important Farmland determinations for USDA programs are made on a soil map unit basis. For example, if the area in question is a delineation of a Prime soil map unit,the whole area is considered Prime regardless of any map unit inclusions within the delineation. Important Farmland determinations are never made for individual components of a soil map unit delineation. The Important Farmland designation of individual delineations of a soil map unit cannot be changed without an on-site investigation and a change in the Official Copy of the soil map where the area is located. This would only occur after an evaluation of a representative sample of all delineations of the specific soil map unit within the soil survey area. There are exceptions. Prime, Statewide, and Local soil map units cannot be urban or 4 built-up areas. A delineation of a Prime, Statewide, or Local soil map unit which has been converted to urban land or build-up areas should no longer be considered Important Farmland. Delineations of some soil map units that are Prime, Statewide, or Local have limitations, such as excessive wetness, limited depth to bedrock, or slope. These soil map units are footnoted on county Important Farmland lists. It is assumed that delineations of these map units are Prime, Statewide, or Local,unless an on-site determination finds that the delineation should not be Important Farmland. A determination that the delineation is not Important Farmland doesn't require a change of the soil map unit symbol. See the FOOTNOTES section for more details. ACT 250 -PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS and PRODUCTIVE FOREST SOILS Primary Agricultural Soils and Productive Forest Soils are defined in Vermont's Land Use and Development Law,Act 250. Criteria 9B-Primary Agricultural Soils The definition of Primary Agricultural Soils can be found in ACT 250, Vermont's Land Use Development Law, 10 V.S.A. section, 601 (15)as revised in May 2006 with the passage of Senate Bill 142. "Primary agricultural soils" means soil map units with the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics that have a potential for growing food, feed, and forage crops,have sufficient moisture and drainage,plant nutrients or responsiveness to fertilizers, few limitations for cultivation or limitations which may be easily overcome and an average slope that does not exceed 15 percent. Present uses may be cropland, pasture,regenerating forests, forestland, or other agricultural or silvicultural uses. However,the soils must be of a size and location,relative to adjoining land uses, so that those soils will be capable,following removal of any identified limitations, of supporting or contributing to an economic or commercial agricultural operation. Unless contradicted by the qualifications stated in this subdivision,primary agricultural soils shall include important farmland soils map units with a rating ofprime, statewide, or local importance as defined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (N.R.C.S.)of the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.). Soil map units with an Important Farmland rating of Prime, Statewide, or Local meet the criteria contained in the definition of Primary Agricultural Soils, subject to a determination of whether such land is of a size capable of supporting or contributing to an economic or commercial agricultural operation. Determination of whether the size criteria is met is not made by NRCS. Any soil map unit in Agricultural Value Groups 1 through 7 and those soil map units in 5 Agricultural Value Group 8 that are rated as Local qualify as Primary Agricultural Soils. Soil map units in Agricultural Value Group 12 have never been mapped and require an on-site investigation to determine the presence of Primary Agricultural Soils. Criteria 9C -Productive Forest Soils The definition of Productive Forest Soils can be found in ACT 250,Vermont's Land Use and Development Law, 10 V.S.A. section 601 (8)as revised in May 2006 with the passage of Senate Bill 142. "Productive forest soils" means those soils which are not primary agricultural soils but which have a reasonable potential for commercial forestry and which have not been developed. In order to qualify as productive forest soils,the land containing such soils shall be of a size and location, relative to adjoining land uses,natural condition,and ownership patterns so that those soils will be capable of supporting or contributing to a commercial forestry operation. Land use on those soils may include commercial timber harvesting and specialized forest uses, such as maple sugar or Christmas tree production. Reasonable potential for commercial forestry is not defined in ACT 250.Because it is not defined, criteria for the determination of reasonable potential of the soil map units is not included in this document. Location and ownership patterns are site-specific and are not related to soils. Determination of whether location or ownership patterns criteria are met is not made by NRCS. Forestland Management and Productivity Tables and databases, found in soil surveys, can be useful in helping to determine if the natural condition of the land has potential for commercial forestry or other specialized forest uses, such as sugarbushes or Christmas trees. Primary Agricultural Soils and Productive Forest Soils Determinations 1.NRCS soil maps can be used to determine the presence and extent of Primary Agricultural Soils on a plot of land. 2.NRCS soil maps can be useful in determining the presence and extent of Productive Forest Soils on a plot of land but cannot be used as the sole determining factor.Until further guidance on this issue is developed,the landowner should consult with the VT county forester or private foresters. AGRICULTURAL VALUE GROUPS In October, 1985,the Natural Resources Conservation Service published"Agricultural Value Groups for Vermont Soils." This publication was revised in March 1995,August 1999, and November 2002. 6 During the late 1980's, a number of county Agricultural Value Group studies were completed. These reports ranked the potential of soil map units within a specific county for crop production. The information in these reports can only be used within the specified county. This report replaces all previous editions of statewide and county reports. Agricultural value groups are a land classification system that can be used to compare the "relative value" for crop production of one soil map unit to another. They can be a useful tool in administering national, state, and local land use programs and regulations. This report contains Agricultural Value Group rankings for all soil map units in Vermont as of March 2003. The soil map units are listed by county soil survey legend in separate eFOTG county soils folders.Because soil survey mapping is still ongoing in some soil surveys,this report will continue to be updated on a regular basis. See Table 2 for the status of county soil surveys in Vermont. Preparation of Agricultural Value Groups The Agricultural Value Groups were derived by integrating three land classification systems: land capability classification,Important Farmland classification, and soil potential ratings. Other factors were also considered, including slope,parent material, and general knowledge of the use and management of specific soils. Soil map unit acreage was used to help derive the relative value of each group. Relative Values The relative value assigned to each Agricultural Value Group is a weighted average for the group and was derived using the soil potential indices(SPI's) (see Soil Potential Study) and the acreage of each soil map unit(see table 1). Acres represent the estimated acreage of each soil map unit. • Soil map units with a relative value of 0 Over 300 different soil map units were considered to have a very limited potential for crop production and were assigned to Agricultural Value Group 11 and given a relative value of 0. These map units include the following types of soils: 1. soils with an extremely stony,very bouldery,or extremely bouldery surface, 2. very poorly drained organic soils, 3. very shallow soils(less than 10 inches to bedrock), 4. soils with slopes greater than 25 percent, 5. soils above 2500 feet elevation(soils in the cryic soil temperature regime), and 7 6. miscellaneous land types (beaches, escarpments, gravel pits, urban areas, etc.). • Soil map units with no relative value assigned Some soil map units within a digitized or published soil survey have never been mapped because of restricted access or because they are in urban areas that were outside the scope of the soil survey at the time. These soil map units are assigned to Agricultural Value Group 12 and not assigned a relative value. • The following soil map units are in Agricultural Value Group 12: Caledonia County 900-Denied Access Chittenden County BUR-Burlington (Limit of Soil Survey) MTFA -Military Test Firing Area Essex County 900-Denied Access Results In 1985, all soils were rated and placed into one of eleven Agricultural Value Groups. Relative values for each group were developed on a scale of 0 to 100,with 100 representing the highest agricultural value. In 1999,Agricultural Value Groups were assigned to each soil map unit in Vermont. Soil map units that consisted of a phase of one major soil(for example,Berkshire fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes)were assigned the relative value of that soil phase based on the 1985 report. Soil map units that consisted of phases of 2 or more major soils(for example,Tunbridge-Lyman complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes)were assigned one relative value based on the relative values and extent of each soil phase in the 1985 report. The results for Agricultural Value Groups are listed by county soil survey legend. Relative values are listed in table 1. As of May,2006,the soil surveys in Caledonia and Essex counties are ongoing and the soil survey legends are subject to change. When using the information from these soil surveys, one should verify that the information is up-to-date with the contacts listed in this report. 8 Interpretation and Use Soil map units were placed in their respective Agricultural Value Groups assuming that it was feasible to apply the corrective measures needed to overcome the soil limitations identified in the soil potential study. Soil map units associated with bedrock or wetness are identified by footnotes, defined in the section Footnotes,and are listed on the soil survey legends. Users of this report are encouraged to consider the footnotes and the need for on-site investigations. Agricultural Value Groups Descriptions Agricultural Value Groups consist of soil map units that have similar characteristics, limitations, management requirements,and potential for crop production. Soil map units in Group 1 have the most potential for crop production and soil map units in Groups 11 and 12 have the least potential for crop production. The description and makeup of the Agricultural Value Groups are as follows: 1 —These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Prime. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 1 or 2. Their relative value is 100. 2—These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2. Their relative value is 97. 3 —These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Prime. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2 or 3. Their relative value is 84. 4—These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide.Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2, 3, or 4. Their relative value is 82. 5-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide.Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 3. Their relative value is 69. 6-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 2, 3, or 4. Their relative value is 63. 7-These soil map units have an Important Farmland rating of Statewide. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 3. Their relative value is 57. 8-The major limitations for crop production include low available water capacity, erosion, and slope. This group includes a few soil map units that have an Important Farmland rating of Local. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 4 or 6. Their relative value is 52. 9-The major limitations for crop production include slope,wetness, surface stones, and bedrock outcrops. On-site investigations are recommended to determine the feasibility of installing corrective measures and using these soils for crop 9 production. If it is determined that corrective measures can't be installed successfully,then the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11.Normally,the cost of overcoming corrective measures and laws governing the installation of corrective measures should not be considered when making this determination. In some situations, if laws prevent the installation of corrective measures,the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 5, 6, or 7. Their relative value is 43. 10-The major limitations for crop production include slope,wetness, surface stones, and bedrock outcrops. They can be used as cropland only after intensive and expensive installation of various corrective measures. On-site investigations are strongly recommended to determine feasibility of installing corrective measures and using these soils for crop production. . If corrective measures can't be installed then the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Normally,the cost of overcoming corrective measures and laws governing the installation of corrective measures should not be considered when making this determination. In some situations, if laws prevent the installation of corrective measures,the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 5, 6, or 7. Their relative value is 22. 11-These soil map units are considered to have very limited potential for crop production.Most of the soil map units are in Land Capability Class 7 or 8. Only in rare situations, and usually after great expense, are these soil map units converted for crop production. Their relative value is 0. 12-These soil map units are areas within a digitized or published soil survey that have never been mapped because of restricted access or the policy on not mapping urban areas that was in place at the time of the survey. An on-site investigation should be conducted to determine if areas of these soil map units should be assigned to a different Agricultural Value Group. No relative value is assigned. Possible Uses Agricultural Value Groups and relative values may be useful in many state and local programs, including: • design and implementation of Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) systems; • implementation of Public Law 97-98,the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA); 10 • rating of agricultural soils for appraisal under Vermont's Use Value Program of Agricultural and Forest Land; • rating of agricultural soils for appraisal under Town Tax Stabilization Programs; • assessment of agricultural soils by land trusts, landowners,bankers,realtors; and • broad resource planning by state agencies and town and regional planning commissions. Note that the relative values are only index numbers and do not represent dollar net returns for a given agricultural use. Determinations of the absolute profitability of agricultural production on a given soil map unit is not possible from these relative values. However,relative values may be used to compare the relative profitability of farming on various soil map units. The user must consider the appropriate footnotes. With the exception of broad planning activities, on-site investigations are recommended when using this report because of the following needs: • To assess wetness, surface stones and boulders,and bedrock limitations. • To access the steepness of soils on slopes ranging from 15 percent to at least 25 percent. The steeper areas may be unsuitable for crop production. • To access landscape pattern limitations. Some areas with good potential may be non-farmable because of irregular slope patterns and the presence of small streams and drainage ways. Landscape patterns can result in small inefficient tract sizes, hamper the operation of farm equipment, and make a site unproductive without additional and expensive land shaping activities. Definitions 1)Land Capability Classification System The Land Capability Classification system shows the suitability of soils for most agricultural uses. Soils are grouped according to their limitations for agricultural crops, the risk of damage when they are used, and the way they respond to management. The grouping does not consider major, and generally expensive, landforming activities that would change slope, depth,or other characteristics of the soils, nor does it consider major land reclamation projects. Soils are grouped at three levels: capability class, subclass, and unit. Classes and 11 subclasses have been used in this study. Capability classes are designated by Roman numerals I through VIII in older soil survey reports, and by Arabic numerals 1 through 8 in newer soil survey reports. The numerals indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: • Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. • Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate conservation practices. • Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require special conservation practices, or both. • Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require very careful management, or both. • Class 5 soils are not likely to erode but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that limit their use. • Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for crop production. • Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for crop production. • Class 8 soils and miscellaneous land areas have limitations that nearly preclude their use for crop production. Capability subclasses indicate the major kinds of limitations within each capability class. Within most capability classes there can be up to four subclasses. Adding a small letter e, w, s, or c,to the class numeral indicates the subclass. An example is 2e. • The letter e represents a risk of erosion, •w means that water in or on the soil will interfere with plant growth or crop production, • s represents a shallow, droughty, or surface stoniness limitation, and • c represents a climate limitation that is very cold or very dry. 2) Soil Potential Study A soil potential study conducted by NRCS formed the numerical basis for developing the Agricultural Value Groups and their relative values. Soil potential ratings are expressed by a soil potential index(SPI),which is a numerical rating of a soil's relative potential for 12 crop production. The soil potential ratings are based on the integration of numerous data derived from literature and the knowledge of technical specialists. Some of this data was estimated based on the knowledge and judgment of the technical specialists. Crop yields on specific soils are examples of such estimates. The estimates and ratings are subject to change when more precise data becomes available. Monetary benefits and costs associated with crop yields and soil corrective measures may change due to inflation and/or technology changes. Such changes may affect the soil potential ratings and thereby warrant an update of this report. The SPI is used to rank soils from very high potential to very low potential and is derived from indices of soil performance, cost of corrective measures, and costs of continuing limitations. The SPI indicates a soil's agricultural profitability potential relative to other soils in the study area. The SPI is expressed by the equation: SPI=P—CM—CL, where: P =performance index(P is determined by a soil's estimated corn silage yield/acre converted to dollars) CM=index of costs of corrective measures needed to overcome or minimize the effects of soil limitations(CM is expressed in dollars/acre/year) CL=index of costs resulting from continuing limitations(CL is expressed as maintenance costs of reduced yields converted to dollars) DIGITAL INFORMATION Agricultural Value Groups and Important Farmland Ratings for most counties are available as part of the TOP20 attribute data table. TOP20 is available through the Vermont Center for Geographic Information(http://www.vcgi.org/)or from NRCS (http//www.vt.nres.usda.gov/soils/). FOOTNOTES Listed below are the footnotes for the county Agricultural Value Groups and Important Farmland rankings in the county soil survey legends. a -For this soil map unit, one of two qualifications apply: 1) if the upper slope limit is between 9 and 15 percent,then the areas of the soil map unit that exceed 8 percent slope do not qualify as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance; or 2) if the upper slope limit exceeds 15 percent,then the areas of the soil map unit that exceed 15 percent 13 slope do not qualify as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. b- One or more of the soils in this soil map unit have a severe wetness limitation due to the presence of a shallow water table during the cropping season. Areas of this soil map unit do not qualify as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance if artificial drainage is not installed. c-Bedrock outcrops commonly cover more than 2 percent of the surface.Areas of this soil map unit will not qualify as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance if bedrock outcrops are extensive enough to prohibit efficient farming. d-The soils in this soil map unit have a wetness limitation that may not be feasible to overcome. Agricultural Value Group assignments are based on the assumption that installing artificial drainage is feasible. Feasible means it is possible to install artificial drainage. Areas of this soil map unit where artificial drainage is not feasible should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11.Normally,the cost of installing artificial drainage and laws governing the installation of artificial drainage should not be considered when making this determination. In some situations, if laws prevent the installation of corrective measures,the area in question should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11. This footnote is assigned to Agricultural Value Groups 1 through 8. e-Bedrock outcrops cover more than 2 percent of the surface. Areas of this soil map unit should be placed in Agricultural Value Group 11 if bedrock outcrops are extensive enough to prohibit efficient farming. This footnote is assigned to Agricultural Value Groups 1 through 8. f-The soils in this soil map unit are frequently flooded.Flooding is likely to occur often under usual weather conditions, and there is more than a 50 percent chance of flooding in any year. Typically, however, flooding occurs outside of the growing season. During the growing season, flooding is expected infrequently under usual weather conditions,with a 5 to 50 percent chance of flooding in any year. 14 CONTACT INFORMATION Stephen H. Gourley, State Soil Scientist USDA-NRCS 356 Mountain View Drive, Suite 105 Colchester, VT 05446 802-951-6796 ext. 236 steve.gourley@vt.usda.gov For an update on the work in on-going soil surveys: Robert F. Long,MLRA Soil Survey Project Leader USDA-NRCS 59 Waterfront Plaza, Suite 12 Newport, VT 05855-4877 802-334-6090 ext. 20 robert.long@vt.usda.uo v To obtain the Important Farmland CD: Caroline Alves, Soil Scientist/GIS Specialist USDA-NRCS 1193 South Brownell Rd., Ste. 35 Williston, VT 05495 802-865-7895 ext 23 caroline.alves@vt.usda.gov Link to the eFOTG web site: http://www.nres.usda.gov/technical/efotg/ For instruction on how to use the site go to the soils section of the VT NRCS web site: http://www.vt.nrcs.usda.gov/soils/so databases.html Table 1. Agricultural Value Groups of Vermont Soils by Important Farmland Rating,Acres, Percentage of State Land Area, and Relative Value compiled in 1985. Agricultural Important Acres Percentage y Relative Value Farmland (1985) of State =Valle Group Rating 1 Prime 91,983 1.56 100 2 Statewide 10,919 0.18 97 3 Prime 289,654 4.88 84 4 Statewide 81.568 1.37 82 5 Statewide 115.386 1.94 69 6 Statewide 469,321 7.92 63 7 Statewide 284.026 4.80 57 8 436,916 7.37 52 9 302.716 5.11 43 10 1,496,360 25.25 22 11 2.348.101 39.62 0 Total 5,926,950 100.0 The acreage figure used to generate this table is based on estimated acres mapped in 1985 for the original report. 16 Table 2. Status of Soil Surveys in Vermont County Soil Available on Available on CD Soil Survey is Survey WEB Soil ongoing Survey Addison yes yes Bennington yes yes Caledonia 2007 yes Chttenden 2006 Essex 2010 Franklin yes 2006 yes Grand Isle yes yes Lamoille yes Orange yes -4 Orleans yeses _ Rutland yes Washington yes yes Windham yes Windsor yes 17 USDA Natural Resources iiiiiii Conservation Service Vermont Soil Fact Sheet Chittenden County,Vermont AdA: Adams and Windsor loamy sands,0 to 5 percent slopes These soils formed in glaciofluvial or glaciolacustrine sands on outwash plains, lake plains,terraces and eskers.ADAMS SOILS are very deep to bedrock and somewhat excessively drained and excessively drained. Permeability is rapid in the solum and very rapid in the substratum. Some areas of these soils have contrasting very gravelly deposits below a depth of 40 inches. WINDSOR SOILS are very deep to bedrock and excessively drained. Permeability is rapid or very rapid. This map unit is suited to cultivated crops, hay and pasture. Low available water capacity and droughtiness are the major management concerns. Important farmland classification: Statewide Land capability: 3 s Vermont Agricultural Value Group: 6 Vermont Residential Wastewater Disposal-Group and Subgroup: la.-This unit is well suited as a site for soil-based residential wastewater disposal systems, based on a review by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of criteria set forth in the Vermont 2007 Environmental Protection Rules. The rapid permeability in the substratum is a concern. Backfilling absorption trenches with at least one foot of finer textured material or other site modifications may be necessary to slow the percolation rate enough to allow for thorough filtering of effluent. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Soil Permeability Organic EROSION FACTORS Soil name Depth Typical Clay reaction (In/Hr) matter (In) texture (Pct) (pH) (Pct) Kw Kf T Adams 0-7 LS 0-5 3.6-6.0 6-20 2.0-5.0 .17 .17 5 7-30 LFS 0-5 4.5-6.0 6-20 1.0-3.0 .17 .17 30-65 LFS 0-5 4.5-6.5 20-100 0.0-0.5 .17 .17 Windsor 0-6 LS 1-3 4.5-6.0 6-20 2.0-4.0 .17 .17 5 6-23 LS 0-3 4.5-6.0 6-20 0.5-2.0 .17 .17 23-65 COS 0-2 4.5-6.5 6-20 0.0-0.5 .10 .10 WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES Depth to seasonal Flooding Ponding Soil name Hydrologic high water table Hydric Depth to bedrock groupFrequency Duration Frequency Duration soil? (range in inches) (Feet) Adams A --- None None No --- Windsor A --- None None No --- LAND USE LIMITATIONS AGRICULTURAL YIELD DATA Soil name Land use Rating Reason** Crop name Yield/acre Adams Dwellings with basements: Not limited Corn silage 16 Tons Windsor Dwellings with basements: Not limited Grass-legume hay 4 Tons Adams Pond reservoir areas: Very limited Seepage Pasture 4.5 AUM Windsor Pond reservoir areas: Very limited Seepage Management WOODLAND MANAGEMENT Soil name concern Rating Reason Vermont natural communities Adams Harvest equip operability: Well suited Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest, Windsor Harvest equip operability: Well suited Hemlock-White Pine-Northern Hardwood Forest Variant, Adams Road suitability: Well suited White Pine-Northern Hardwood Forest Variant, Windsor Road suitability: Well suited Hemlock Forest Adams Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Windsor Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Distribution Generation Date:3/13/2008 Page 1 of 1 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Vermont Soil Fact Sheet Chittenden County,Vermont BIB: Belgrade and Eldridge soils, 3 to 8 percent slopes Eldridge soils formed in sandy glaciofluvial or aeolian deposits over stratified loamy glaciolacustrine deposits and Belgrade soils formed in loamy glaciolacustrine deposits on lake plains and terraces. BELGRADE SOILS are very deep to bedrock and moderately well drained. These soils have a water table at depths of 1.5 to 3.5 feet below the surface from late Fall through early Spring. Permeability is moderate in the solum and slow to moderately rapid in the substratum. Below 40 inches some pedons have layers of gravelly sand or sand. This map unit is well suited to cultivated crops, hay and pasture. Erosion is a hazard. A seasonal high water table may inhibit the establishment of some crops. Important farmland classification: Statewide Land capability: 2 e Vermont Agricultural Value Group: 2 Vermont Residential Wastewater Disposal-Group and Subgroup: Illc.-This unit is marginally suited as a site for soil-based residential wastewater disposal systems, based on a review by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of criteria set forth in the Vermont 2007 Environmental Protection Rules. The depth to the seasonal high water table in association with the minimal slope is the major limitation. A detailed, site-specific analysis is generally required. On-site groundwater level monitoring and determination of induced groundwater mounding is often necessary to establish the suitability of this unit. Curtain drains may help lower the water table to an acceptable level, however, the minimal slope may prevent their use in many areas. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Soil Permeability Organic EROSION FACTORS Soil name Depth Typical Clay reaction (In/Hr) matter (In) texture (Pct) (pH) (Pct) Kw Kf T Belgrade 0-7 VFSL 4-15 4.5-7.3 0.6-2 1.0-5.0 .49 .49 5 7-23 VFSL 4-15 4.5-7.3 0.6-2 0.5-3.0 .64 .64 23-60 VFSL 2-20 6.1 -7.8 0.06-6 0.0-1.0 .64 .64 Eldridge 0-9 LFS 1-5 5.1 -7.3 6-20 2.0-4.0 .24 .24 5 9-27 LFS 1-5 5.1 -7.3 6-20 0.5-2.0 .24 .24 27-60 SIL 3-18 5.1 -7.3 0.06-0.6 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES Hydrologic Depth to seasonal Flooding Ponding high water table Hydric Soil name group g Frequency Duration Frequency Duration soil? Depth to bedrock (Feet) (range in inches) Belgrade B 1.5-3.5 None None No --- Eldridge C 1.0-2.0 None None No --- LAND USE LIMITATIONS AGRICULTURAL YIELD DATA Soil name Land use Rating Reason** Crop name Yield/acre Belgrade Dwellings with basements: Very limited Depth to saturated zone Grass-clover 7.5 AUM Eldridge Dwellings with basements: Very limited Depth to saturated zone Grass-legume hay 3.5 Tons Belgrade Pond reservoir areas: Somewhat limited Seepage Alfalfa hay 4 Tons Eldridge Pond reservoir areas: Very limited Seepage Corn silage 22 Tons Management WOODLAND MANAGEMENT Soil name concern Rating Reason Vermont natural communities Belgrade Harvest equip operability: Moderately suited Wetness Northern Hardwood Forest, Eldridge Harvest equip operability: Moderately suited Wetness Rich Northern Hardwood Forest, Belgrade Sugar Maple-Ostrich Fern Riverine Floodplain 9 Road suitability: Moderately suited Wetness Forest Eldridge Road suitability: Moderately suited Wetness Belgrade Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Eldridge Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Distribution Generation Date:3/13/2008 Page 1 of 1 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Vermont Soil Fact Sheet Chittenden County,Vermont EwA: Enosburg and Whately soils,0 to 3 percent slopes Enousburg soils formed in sandy glaciofluvial or aeolian deposits over loamy glaciolacustrine deposits and Whately soils formed in a thin layer of loamy over clayey glaciolacustrine sediments on lake plains and outwash areas. ENOSBURG SOILS are very deep to bedrock and poorly drained. These soils have a water table at depths of 0 to 1.0 feet below the surface from late Fall through late Spring. Permeability is rapid in the surface layer and upper part of the substratum and moderately slow or slow in the lower part of the substratum. WHATELY SOILS are very deep to bedrock and very poorly drained. These soils have a water table that is ponded on the surface to 1.0 feet below the surface from Fall through Late Summer. Permeability is moderately rapid to rapid in the surface layer, moderately rapid in the subsoil and slow or very slow in the substratum. This map unit is suited to cultivated crops if adequate drainage is provided. They are well suited to hay and pasture. A seasonal high water table may inhibit the establishment of some crops. Areas of this map unit may be classified as wetland and drainage may be regulated. Important farmland classification: Statewide(b) Land capability: 3 w Vermont Agricultural Value Group: 4d Vermont Residential Wastewater Disposal-Group and Subgroup: IVa.-This unit is generally not suited as a site for soil-based residential wastewater disposal systems, based on a review by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of criteria set forth in the Vermont 2007 Environmental Protection Rules. Excessive soil wetness in association with the minimal slope is the limiting condition. Prolonged periods of saturation at or near the soil surface do not allow for the proper functioning of septic systems. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Soil name Depth Typical Clay Soil Permeability Organic EROSION FACTORS (In) texture Clay(Pct) reaction (In/Hr) matter (pH) (Pct) Kw I Kf I T Enosburg 0-8 LS 1-5 4.5-6.5 6-20 2.0-4.0 .24 .24 5 8-32 COS 1-5 4.5-7.3 6-20 0.5-2.0 .24 .24 32-65 SI 3-18 5.6-7.3 0.06-0.6 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 Whately 0-8 FSL 5-12 5.1 -7.3 2-6 4.0-8.0 .28 .28 5 8-15 FSL 5-12 5.1 -7.3 2-6 0.5-3.0 .32 .32 15-65 SICL 35-55 5.6-8.4 0-0.2 0.0-0.5 .49 .49 WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES Hydrologic Depth to seasonal Flooding Ponding Soil name group high water table Hydric Frequency Duration Frequency Duration soil? Depth to bedrock (Feet) (range in inches) Enosburg C 0.0-1.0 None None Yes --- Whately D 0.0-1.5 None None Yes --- LAND USE LIMITATIONS AGRICULTURAL YIELD DATA Soil name Land use Rating Reason** Crop name Yield/acre Enosburg Dwellings with basements: Very limited Depth to saturated zone Corn silage 18 Tons Whately Dwellings with basements: Very limited Depth to saturated zone Grass hay 3 Tons Enosburg Pond reservoir areas: Very limited Seepage Grass-clover 5.6 AUM Whately Pond reservoir areas: Not limited Grass-legume hay 3 Tons Management WOODLAND MANAGEMENT Soil name concern Rating Reason Vermont natural communities Enosburg Harvest equip operability: Poorly suited Wetness Red Maple-Black Ash Swamp, Whately Harvest equip operability: Poorly suited Wetness Spruce-Fir-Tamarack Swamp, Enosburg Road suitability: Poorly suited Wetness Alder Swamp Whately Road suitability: Poorly suited Wetness Enosburg Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Whately Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Distribution Generation Date:3/13/2008 Page 1 of 1 USDA Natural Resources 11--1110 Conservation Service Vermont Soil Fact Sheet Chittenden County,Vermont HnA: Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes HINESBURG SOILS formed in sandy glaciofluvial deposits over loamy glaciolacustrine deposits on lake plains and deltas. They are very deep to bedrock and well drained. These soils have a perched water table at depths of 1.5 to 2.5 feet below the surface from late Fall through late Spring. Permeability is rapid in the solum and moderately slow in the substratum. These soils are suited to cultivated crops and well suited to hay and pasture. Low available water capacity and droughtiness are the major management concerns. Important farmland classification: Prime; Land capability: 2 s Vermont Agricultural Value Group: 3 Vermont Residential Wastewater Disposal-Group and Subgroup: Ilh.-This unit is moderately suited as a site for soil-based residential wastewater disposal systems, based on a review by the Natural Resources Conservation Service of criteria set forth in the Vermont 2007 Environmental Protection Rules. The depth to the seasonal high water table is the primary concern. Mound system construction and other site modifications are often necessary. On sloping sites, curtain drains can help lower the water table to an acceptable level. In some cases, a detailed, site-specific analysis with groundwater level monitoring and determination of induced groundwater mounding may be required to establish the suitability of this unit. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Soil Permeability Organic EROSION FACTORS Soil name Depth Typical Clay reaction (In/Hr) matter (In) texture (Pct) (pH) (Pct) Kw I Kf I T Hinesburg 0-8 FSL 1-5 5.6-6.5 6-20 3.0-6.0 .24 .24 5 8-28 LFS 1-5 5.6-6.5 6-20 0.5-2.0 .24 .24 28-65 VFSL 3-16 5.1 -7.3 0.2-0.6 0.0-0.5 .43 .43 WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES Hydrologic Depth to seasonal Flooding Ponding Soil name group high water table Hydric Frequency Duration Frequency Duration soil? Depth to bedrock (Feet) (range in inches) Hinesburg C 2.0-4.0 None None No --- LAND USE LIMITATIONS AGRICULTURAL YIELD DATA Soil name Land use Rating Reason** Crop name Yield/acre Hinesburg Dwellings with basements: Somewhat limited Depth to saturated zone Grass-clover 5.6 AUM Hinesburg Pond reservoir areas: Very limited Seepage Alfalfa hay 4 Tons Grass-legume hay 3.5 Tons Corn silage 16 Tons Grass hay 3 Tons Management WOODLAND MANAGEMENT Soil name concern Rating Reason Vermont natural communities Hinesburg Harvest equip operability: Well suited White Pine-Red Oak-Black Oak Forest, White Pine-Northern Hardwood Forest Variant, Hinesburg Road suitability: Well suited Sugar Maple-Ostrich Fern Riverine Floodplain Hinesburg Erosion hazard(off-road): Slight Forest Distribution Generation Date:3/13/2008 Page 1 of 1 • 101.1664% southburtington VERMONT MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: Kimberly L. Murray, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing: Interim Zoning Application#IZ-12-14 (462 Shelburne Road) DATE: February 4, 2013 City Council meeting Tonight's continued public hearing from January 7, 2013 is an application to raze the existing Liberty Inn and Suites and construct a 31,280 square foot, three story, general office building with 121 parking spaces located in the Commercial 1 —Residential 15 Zoning District at 462 Shelburne Road. The site is 1.71 acres. Staff has received the specifications for a photovoltaic array the applicant plans to install on the roof. Attached are the specifications of the array itself, additional specifications for complete installation are on file. Since the hearing on January 7th staff has learned the array will be connected to the electric power grid and therefore not subject to local approval but may be regulated by the Public Service Board for review and approval. Notice to the City will depend on size and scale of proposed array. Bob Bouchard from Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, representing the applicant will be attending the meeting. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4131 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com I Canadian Solar r :ly I • it �rr ✓^ J ,..„,„-,.....,,,z,z, ... . ... . _y --.;':,„--,,.:=..-:,..'-' C s 6 p T.:.,.: 1 l , I € ,_i �It l e / i 1 I f 2301235i240/245l250P 11 7 i t 1 : E -_i II:1 J } � i fill { II i. ._, ; I f On-grid Module CS6P isa robust solar module with 60sotar i i , : r li' i illi -I cells.These modules can housed for on-grid solar applications.Ourmeticulous design and production techniques ensurea high-yield, long-term performance forevery module produced. Our rigorous quality control and . in-house testing facilities guarantee Canadian Solar's modules meetthe highest g esi quality d possible. - standards P i Key'Feat ores : : •..;Top rankedPV1-iSA(PTC. ratingin California for .'i Applications energy production. p l0 • On-grid resid ential denliat roof-tops. •• first compre Industry.............p hensive warrantyinsurance by .:_ . • On-grid commercial/industral roof-tops AM Best rated leading insurance companies in the world � • Solar powerstations • Other on-grid applications ••.Industry leading plus only power.tolerance:0.-..+5w.-;:- • Strong framedmodule,Oa'ssingmechanical load test Quality Certificates of5400Patowithstandheavier_snowlead • IEC 61215, 1EC61730,UL1703,CEC Listed, The 1st manufacturerin:the PVindustry certified for CE and MCS 1S0 TS16949Theautomotiive quality manag• ement 1:ent20 systems terns Standards for quality q ymanagement.::.: .. management systems system)in module production since 2003 • ISO1TS16949:2009: The automotive quality -_.. management system 1S017025 qualified manufacturer owned testing lab,...:_ fully complying tolEC,•TUV,UL.testing standards • Backed By OurNew 10125 Linear Power Warranty..".. .Backed CertificatesPlusouradded25yearInsurancecoverage ISO14001:2004:Standards for Environmental tsusd management systems 97x • QC080000 HSPM:The Certification for 90x � Adged Vw �.aftre FroilaWarramy Hazardous Substances Regulations sox �f 5 ¶0 15 20 ss 10 yearproduct warrantyon materials.and:Workrrianshi P a `A: al. .Ell. C(C')0 ... . .25yearainea.rpower output warranty . : , .., . S ry crtte -f2.. www.canadjansolar.com 0 CS6 P�20l5/2l25l250 Electrical Data STC CS6P-230P CS6P-235P CS6P 240P CS6P-245P CS6P-250P Nominal Maximum Power(Pmax) 230W 235W 240W 245W 260W Temperature Characteristics Optimum Operating Village(Vmp) 29.6V 29.8V 29.9V 30.OV 30.IV Pmax -0.43%/c Optimum Operating Current(Imp) 7.78A 7.90A 8.03A 8.17A 8.30A TemperatureCoefftcient Voc •0.34%fC Open Circuit Voltage(Voc) 36.8V 36.9V 37,OV 37.1V 37.2V Isc 0.065%/C Short Circuit Current(Esc) 8,34A 8.46A 8.59A 8.74A 8.87A Normal Operating CellTemperature 45±2b Module Efficiency 14.30% 14.61% 14.92% 15.23% 15.54% Operating Temperature •40C-+85C Performance at Low Irradiance Maximum System Voltage 1000V(IEC)f600V(IL) Maximum Series FuseRating 15A Industry leading performance at low Irradiation environment,495.5%module efficiency from an` Application Classification Class A Irradiance of 1000w/m°to 200w/rn° Power Tolerance 0_+5W (AM 1.5.25 t) Under Standard Test Conditions(STC)of irradiance of 1 000 W1m',spectrum AM 1.S and cell temperature of 25C NOGT CSOP-230P CS6P•235P CS6P-240P CSSP-245P CS6P-250P Engineering Drawings Nominal Maximum Power(Pmax) 167W 170W 174W 178W 181W Optimum Operating Voltage(Vmp) 27.0V 27.2V 27.3V 27.4V 27.5V _ Optimum Operating Current(imp) 6.18A 6.27A 6.38A 6.49A 6.60A 111111111111111111111111 Open Circuit Voltage(Voc) 33.8V 33.9V 34.OV 34,1V 34.2V Illilllllllllllllll(111 Short Circuit Current(Ise) 6.76A 6.86A 6.96A 7.08A 7,19A ��I1 Under Normal Operating sou Temperature,Irradiance of800 Wm',spectrumAM 1.5,amblanttemperature 20,C. • III(lllllllllllllllllll wind speed 1 m/s III(Illlll1111111111111 Mechanical Data 111111111111111111111E Cell Type Poly-crystalline 156 x 156mm,tar 3 Busbars 111111111111,11.11111111 Cell Arrangement 60(6 x 10) 111111111111111111111 t7imensians 1638 x 982x 40mm(fi4.5x 38.7 x 1.57in) Weight 20kg(44.1!bs) 1111111111111111111111 Front Cover 3.2mm Tempered glass 11111111111111111111111 Frame Material Anodized aluminium alloy 11111111111111111111111 d•BOX IP65,3 diodes Cable 4mm'(iEC)112AWG(UL),1100mm l rar Connectors MC4 or MC4 Comparable Standard Packaging(Modules per Pallet) 24pcs Module Pieces percontainer(40 ft.Container) 672pcs(40'HO) e I-V Curves(CS6P-250P) t i . .. S.eeone° i cl Iwo I i Tili ( r =j I i i i sera x• I �..] • !. .'. ell • 'Specifications included Malls datasheet are subject to cbangewithoul prior notice. . About Canadian Solar Canadian Solar Inc.Is one of the world's largest solar Canadian Solar was founded in Canada In 2001 and was companies. As a leading vertically•Integrated successfully listed on NASDAQ Exchange (symbol: CSIQ) in manufacturer of Ingots,wafers,cells,solarmodules and November 2006. Canadian Solar has already expanded Its solar systems. Canadian Solar delivers solar power module manufacturing capacity to 2.05GW and cell products of uncompromising quality to worldwide manufacturing capacity to1.3GW in 2011. customers. Canadian Solar's world class team of professionals works closely with our customers to -, ifyf: y �, : . provide them with solutions for all their solar needs. F r,-^- ^��� ,J�� ..�,�� t .i�lieadc)tlat0.1- It§..(P- yir;46-64iARP $14Pt13P F r s „ •-' ,IS1tcharterr }:61a.1 of0.0106 fa I4..2K3$2 r 441..1,54 lc Tel,r'"1-,519 9 4 2057�. e r i ' ,.a r r fax,+1 5f9 'r&2(�07 a `� 'a inquire ca can di'psol,Strc9)7J h - u r r i0 WIN cana )0n§o it tads '-" ,� s E N.Rer 3,39 Copynghtc 2011 Caned Saar Inc. �, ,,- *,- ;: -0A 1 .f,.i� r - ), "'_. ;_ 7 s,r �,, �6 south urlington PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington City Council & City Manager FROM: South Burlington Planning Commission Paul Conner, Director of Planning &Zoning SUBJECT: First Reading of Draft Land Development Regulations approved by Planning Commission DATE: February 4, 2013 City Council meeting The Planning Commission voted on January 8th,following its public hearing,to approve the enclosed series of amendments to the Land Development Regulations and forward them to the City Council for consideration.The Commission discussed and reviewed these amendments during the fall of 2012. Below is a brief description of each of the proposed amendments.The numbers correspond to each of the items in the enclosed draft amendment.Attached as well is a brief summary report describing the relationship between the proposed amendments and the City's Comprehensive Plan, as required by State law. Recommendation: staff recommends the City Council proceed by warning a Second Reading and Public Hearing to consider the adoption of these amendments (suggested date: Monday, March 4th or Monday March 18th) 1. Housing Types requirements in the SEQ Brief Summary:Amendment would replace recommendation for a mix of housing"types" with a mix of housing styles in the Southeast Quadrant. Functional change:The DRB presently interprets the standard as requiring variety in the number of housing units in a building, and in the design of the buildings within a development. Under the amendment,there would be a clearer definition of the variety of design of buildings, and no requirement for a variety in the number of housing units in a building within a development. 2. PUDs on Small Lots/ Lot Frontage requirements Brief Summary:Amendment would prohibit PUDs on lots of less than 2 acres in the following low- density residential districts: R1, R1-LV, R2, R4, and LN, unless otherwise required by the bylaws. Amendment would also require a minimum lot width of 50' at the street in those same zoning districts. Functional change: PUDs are presently allowable in all areas, proving for more than one building on a lot, and flexibility is development standards. At present there is no requirement for a lot to have a minimum width at the street(frontage). Under the amendment, PUDs would be prohibited on los of 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com less than 2 acres in lower-density zoning districts, and a minimum of 50' lot width would be required. 3. New use category: Cannabis Dispensaries Brief Summary:This amendment would create a new land use category to permit and specify the permissible location of cannabis dispensaries in the city, as authorized under State Law.The new use would include two sub-uses: Cannabis dispensary (dispensing only). Use permitted within the following Districts: Industrial- Commercial (IC) and Industrial-Open Space (10). Cannabis dispensary(cultivation only). Use permitted within the following districts: C1-R12, C1- R15, C1-Auto, C1-Air, CD-1, CD-2, CD-3, CD-4,AR,SW, C2, IC (the same districts as permit retail and retail services) Functional change:This new land use is not presently defined with the regulations, but may be permissible.The addition of this use category would specifically define the land use as it is defined in state statute, and specify districts in which it is permitted.The language would also specify, as is stated under state law,that such dispensaries shall not be located within 1,000' of a pre-existing school or child care facility. 4. Planning Commission membership and duties Brief Summary:Amendment LDRs to be consistent with the City Charter. Functional Change: None, except to ensure consistency. 5. Temporary Uses Brief Summary:Amendment would clarify that temporary events can be undertaken by any organization for broad purposes. Functional change:Technically, at present, the allowance for 2 outdoor events per year with tents applies ONLY to businesses for"outdoor sales events".The amendment would clarify that non- profits and other property owners could hold such events, and that they need not be for outdoor sales. Note:this amendment was under development prior to the joint Council-Commission meeting. 6. Indoor Vehicle Storage in the Mixed Industrial-Commercial District Brief summary:Amendment would allow a minor portion of buildings in this district, up to 10,000 sq ft,to be used for seasonal vehicle storage. Functional Change:A minor portion of an industrial building could be used for long-term vehicle storage.The definition for the use specifies the nature of long-term storage, as opposed to commercial parking. 2 7. Seasonal Mobile Food Units Brief Summary:Would amend the review process of re-approval of existing seasonal mobile food units, streamlining the steps required of the applicant assuming no changes in operations and no prior problems. Functional Change: would allow for administrative re-approval of previously-approved seasonal mobile food units. 8. Interstate Highway Overlay Brief summary:Amendment would allow pre-existing buildings within the Interstate Overlay Zoning District to changes uses to any use allowed in the underlying zoning district.The amendment would also exempt pre-existing single-and two-family homes(of which there are a handful along Oakwood Drive)from the district. Functional Change:At present, all pre-existing buildings in the Interstate Overlay District are non- conforming AND all uses within such buildings are non-conforming. No expansions to the buildings or changes the uses within them are permitted. Under the amendment, buildings would not be able to be expanded, but the uses within them could change to any permitted within the underlying zoning district. Regarding pre-existing single-and two-family homes, at present no expansions, deck additions, or new accessory structures are permitted.This amendment would allow for these additions as elsewhere in the neighborhood. 3 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Key to amendments: Proposed additions are bold and underlined Proposed deletions have a line through them NOTES FOR CLARITY ARE IN SMALL CAPITAL LETTERS 1. HOUSING "TYPE" STANDARDS IN THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT 9.08 SEQ-NRT and SEQ-NR Subdistricts; Specific Standards C. Residential Design Mix of Housing Types Styles.A mix of housing types styles (i.e. ranch, cape cods colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types These should be mixed within blocks, along the street, and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near-identical units.housing types. 9.09 SEQ-VR Subdistrict; Specific Standards C. Residential Design jMix of Housing Ty_ pes Styles. A mix of housingtypes styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes,andaffordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. Housing types These should be mixed within blocks, along the street, and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near-identical units. housing types. 2. PUD LIMITS ON SMALL PARCELS / MIN ROAD FRONTAGE 3.05 Lots C. Road Frontage. In order to promote infill development while protecting the character of existing neighborhoods, no lot shall be created without a minimum of 50-ft of frontage on a public road in the following districts: Rl,R1-LV, R2,R4, and LN D. Pre-existing small lots... 1 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 D E. Corner lots... 15.02 Authority Required Review 15.02 C. Elective PUD Review. In all districts of the City, any applicant for site plan, conditional use and/or subdivision review, or any other application for land development requiring action by the Development Review Board, may request review pursuant to the PUD process and regulations, except for parcels of land less than two (2) acres in the following districts: R1, R1-LV, R2,R4, and LN. 3. CANNABIS DISPENSARIES PREPARED BY: STAFF,BASED ON 10-9-2012 PC MEETING 2.02 Specific Definitions ••• Cannabis Dispensary: a nonprofit entity registered under section 18 VSA 4474e which acquires, possesses, cultivates, manufactures,transfers, transports, supplies, sells, or dispenses marijuana, marijuana-infused products,and marijuana-related supplies and educational materials for or to a registered Patient who has designated it as his or her center and to his or her registered caregiver for the registered patient's use for symptom relief. A dispensary shall not be located within 1000 feet of the property line of a preexisting public or private school or licensed or regulated child care facility. Cannabis Dispensary(dispensing only) A portion of a cannabis dispensary providing marijuana'for symptom relief to registered patients. Cannabis Dispensary (cultivation only): A portion of a cannabis dispensary where the marijuana is cultivated. CHANGES TO TABLE OF USES: NEW USE: Cannabis dispensary (dispensing only). Use permitted within the following districts: Cl-R12, C -R15,Cl-Auto, Cl-Air, CD-1, CD-2, CD-3, CD-4, SW, C2, IC-TO. NEW USE: Cannabis dispensary (cultivation only). Use permitted within the following Districts: Industrial-Commercial (IC) and Industrial-Open Space (10). 2 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP, TERMS, DUTIES 17.07 Planning Commission A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington City Council shall appoint a Planning Commission. B. Members and Terms of Office. Membership and Terms of Office for the Planning ............ Commission are set forth in the City Charter,24 V.S.A. App 41S=70 . The Planning Commission shall have not fewer than three «` than ne (9) voting member All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. All members of the Planning Commission shall be residents of the City of South Burlington.The City Council ti fthe Planing Co m s:on C. Term of Office. The term of each member shall be four(1) years, except that the terms of the members first-appeinted-shal-lbe--se-fixed--that-4ar-eeramissiens-ef-eight-(8)-members-er-fewer • commissions of nine (9)members, ne mere than three(3) shall be so reappointed or replaced. Any member may be removed at any time by a unanimous vote of the City Council. Any appeintment--te--44-1-a-vaeaneshall-be-fer-the-nrieNpireil-tenm-Ifa member relocates to another municipality before his orherteun of office expires, such member shall be replaced. D. Procedural Rules.The Planning Commission shall elect its chairman and a clerk. The Planning Commission shall keep a-record of its resolutions,transactions, and findings of fact, which shall be maintained as a public record of the municipality. The Planning Commission shall adopt by majority vote of those members present and voting such rules as it deems necessary and appropriate for the performance of its functions. E. Powers and Duties.The planning commission shall exercise all powers and duties as provided for in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App. § 13-702. (1) D th C t- of S ,tt, B rlingt C, eho a Pl^ ..,1 endments th f is t' h th City Council .,nil to dments th € it' t d b th t f rth V t Municipal Pl. .. nd i-c�-ir.T,scrrorm-i-c�o crirr6ircrvrar.r .t.... . ........�:b :.... Development Act Title 21, Part 2, Chapter 117, subchapter 5. uncil proposed bylaws and make recommendations to the City Council onproposed ^ ndments to s ch ylaws as set forth in subchapter 6 of the above mentioned chapter. >^ h to 6 f th h t e ch^ to (3) Administer bylaws adopted under s,�p«r-aye—e�o�n�r�=s==., ., �Y .,., ex,eept t tl 0 x t tht th to„ aose functions . o Y erf rmed by the City f South Burlington Development Review Board. 3 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 (4) Ordo it. stud: �d ak ndnt; „tto of land o ■iu t' d nl do of e�t c[CPSIp�iilGTc�-C[cvcCPITGTL�G'`v`{ZCnCfC[T[ir.�7'pvrcCCTioT, ccoircTi[ic-liixcr�on.ax 6. 1. ti fic,t: nd do ntom histo nds� tl t' � .,d the deyel..r.ment of renewable 0 rbJ ,.• .... , d tl d otect: D t. .,the ed by the pin that •• elo .mot t th r6 ;.. ; f rY.,nt; ste established , „der Z �7 C A 20 shall be compatible with,useful to, and shared with that system. (5) D d t de •tnl b dget d f r od „f l�T��circ-cc-ce-vi�miireiraccrvccpi taro acr�c�m=rcrpx o�nccxir romp�..�,.. .,. five years, as set forth in section 1126 of Title 21, for action b the City Council, t rtt d t nnnn fTtl nn (6) Hold public meetings. (7) Require from other departments and agencies of the city such available information as relates to the work of the planning commission. surveys. (9) Participate in a regional planning program. • engineering studies. • fulfill the duties and obligations imposed by and thetents and purposes of Title 21, Chapter 117. 5. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES & ES 3.08 Temporary Structures and Uses E. Temporary Uses Exemptfrom Revie 'I he following uses are permitted without requiring review under this section provided such uses do not exceed the stated limits of this subsection. Uses which-exceed the stated limits shall be considered to be permanent uses and, as such,are restricted by other,portions ofthese regulations. (4) Outdoor salesevents held by a business, organization,or resident on the same lot for no more than four(4) consecutive days,two (2)times per calendar year. 6. INDOOR VEHICLE STORAGE IN MIXED INDUSTRIAL- COMMERCIAL APPENDIX C PERMITTED AS ACCESORY USE IN IC DISTRICT: Indoor vehicle storage, maximum 10,000 square feet (TO BE LABELLED AS P-ACC) 2.02 Specific Definitions: 4 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 Indoor vehicle storage. Indoor facility used to store motor vehicles, such as cars, pick-up trucks,RVs, motor cycles, snowmobiles and boats, but not including aircraft or any vehicle requiring a CDL operator's license. Vehicle storage is typically seasonal, and vehicles are not typically accessible to their owners during the storage period. 7. SEASONAL MOBILE FOOD UNITS 13.22 Seasonal Mobile Food Units Seasonal mobile food units shall be subject to site plan review by the Development Review Board and the following requirements: A. A proposed seasonal mobile food unit shall provide evidence of a valid Commerc ial Caterer License from the Vermont Department of Health. B. A seasonal mobile food unit may have temporary outdoor seating for a maximum of sixteen (16)people. Temporary outdoor seating shall he placed directly on the ground with no foundation or underlying structure. C. A seasonal mobile food unit shall not he permitted to operate between the hours of 9:00 pm and 7:00 am. D. A seasonal mobile food unit shall not be permitted to operate between November 1 and March 30. D. A seasonal mobile food unit,and any associated seating and accessory items such as dumpsters, shall be removed from the property at the expiry of its permit under these regulations. E. A seasonal mobile food unit shall be xe pt from landscaping requirements under these regulations. G-F. Prior to approval of a zoning permit or renewal, a written recommendation shall be sought from the South Burlington Police Department, South Burlington Fire Department, and South Burlington Department of Public Works. Said permit or renewal may be denied,if vehicular access to the property is likely to, or has, created unsafe vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions adjacent to the property. G. A zoning permit for seasonal mobile food unit shall be valid for a maximum of two seven (7) months, from April 1 to October 31, after which time it expires. After the L II. A seasonal mobile food unit zoning permit may be renewed in subsequent calendar years at the request of the applicant. The administrative officer shall approve the renewal upon finding that all aspects of the permit and these requirements regulations have been met and in the previous year's operation of the seasonal mobile food unit 5 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 to date. No such renewal shall be issued if no zoning permit was issued in the previous calendar year. 3:I. Any modifications to an approved site plan shall require an amendment as required by these Regulations. 47 K. A seasonal mobile food unit shall be exempt from Section 10.02, Traffic Overlay District, of these regulations. 8. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY OVERLAY 10.04 Interstate Highway Overlay District (IHO) C. Use Standards. (1) No building of any kind, including any-structure of construction such as parking facilities or lots, or tennis courts, or farm buildings, shall be permitted within the district, except as specifically provided in this section. Any use or structure granted approval within the Interstate. Highway Overlay District shall be subject to the specific provisions of this section. (2) The following structures and infrastructure uses shall generally be allowed in the IHO district, subject to conditional use approval by the Development Review Board: • • (a) griculture ertieult„r d � + 1 a' tt- t fl i 1 uc 7 7 9 = 1_ rr rl1'a (b) Public recreation paths (c) f=goadways or access drives for purposes of accessing a preexisting or approved structure within the IHO district and no other reasonable provisions for access can be made. (d) Utility lines, including power, telephone, cable, sewer and water. (e) Stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance thereof, including necessary removal of vegetation and dredging. (f) Research and educational activities provided any building or structure, including parking lots or facilities, is located outside the IHO district. (g) Hydro-electric power generation (h) Municipal buildings, subject to the provisions of Section 10.03(D) below. (3) Use of nonconforming structures. Nonconforming structures within the IHO district may used for any land use allowed within the underlying zoning district, in accordance with Table C-1, Table of Uses. 6 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 (3 4) Encroachment of other uses into the IHO district. The encroachment of land uses allowed in the underlying zoning district into the IHO district may be allowed by the Development Review Board as a conditional use under certain circumstances as provided below, and provided the area of encroachment is screened from view by existing or proposed landscaping and/or topography: (a) The encroachment is necessary to rectify a natural catastrophe or for the protection of the public health, safety or welfare; OR (b) The encroachment is necessary for the purposes of p oviding for or improving public facilities; OR (c) The encroachment is necessary to provide safe ess • parcel on which a use has been approved by the DRB in cases whey : is no feasible alternative to the encroachment. D. Encroachment of municipal buildings in the IHO district. In portion se IHO district where the underlying zoning district is MU-Municipal,the Development Revi - ara ay allow the encroachment of municipal facilities as a conditional use subject to the ing standards and criteria: (1) Accessory uses not directly related and essential to the functioning of the municipal building shall not be permitted within the IHO district. (2) A finding is made by the DRY that the proposed municipal building cannot be located outside the IHO district because the followingteria are met: (a) The use must occur in close proximity to another preexisting municipal building; AND (b) There is no reasonably practicable a i tive location for the municipal building. with pre-existing investment in th. te a consideration for the practicabilit\ of alternative locations: AND (c) The encroachment is the minimum necessary to operate the proposed municipal building. (3) The maximum extent of encroachment shall be no more than fifteen (15)feet into the IHO district. (E). Exemption for lots with existing single or two-family dwellings. A lot containing an existing single or two-family dwelling, as of the effective date of these regulations,shall be exempt from the provisions of this Section 10.04. Notwithstanding this exemption, no additional dwelling units or new principal structures shall be permitted on such lots. Figure 10-1 Interstate Highway Overlay District 7 City of South Burlington Draft Land Development Regulation Amendments Approved by the Planning Commission 1-8-2013 aI #so, ---..-- ._.'.::'.,', _ 5 J f 3 t ‘1, 8 0:0110‘414 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING South Burlington Planning Commission Proposed Land Development Regulation Amendment Report Public Hearing Scheduled for January 8, 2013 In accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4441(c), the South Burlington Planning Commission has prepared the following report regarding the proposed amendment to the city's Land Development Regulations. Brief Description of the Proposed Amendments The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on January 8, 2013 in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT to consider the following amendment to the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: 1. Revise "mix of housing type" standards in the Southeast Quadrant to focus on style of building; 2. Prohibit elective Planned Unit Development review on lots of less than two (2) acres in the R1, R1-LV, R2, R4, and LN zoning districts; 3. Require a minimum road frontage of 50' on lots in the R1, R1-LV, R2, R4, and LN zoning districts; 4. Permit cannabis dispensaries (dispensing only) in the C1-R12, C1-R15, C1-Auto, C1-Air, CD-1, CD-2, CD-3, CD-4, SW, C2, and IC-TO zoning districts; 5. Permit cannabis dispensaries (cultivation only) in the IC and 10 zoning districts; 6. Amend Planning Commission terms and duties to be consistent with the City Charter; 7. Amend Temporary Uses Exempt from review to include all organizations and residents, and include outdoor events, not only outdoor"sales" events; 8. Adjust re-approval process for previously-approved Seasonal Mobile Food Units to allow for administrative re-approval; 9. Allow for changes of use to all those allowed within the underlying zoning district for pre-existing buildings within the Interstate Overlay District; and, 10. Create a new use category for"indoor vehicle storage" permitted as an accessory use in the Mixed Industrial-Commercial District 11. Technical corrections related to the above amendments. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Findings Concerning the Proposed Amendment The proposed amendments have been considered by the Planning Commission for their consistency with the text, goals, and objectives of the City of South Burlington's Comprehensive Plan, last adopted March 9, 2011. For each of the amendments, the Commission has addressed the following as enumerated under 24 VSA 4441(c): "...The report shall provide a brief explanation of the proposed bylaw, amendment, or repeal and shall include a statement of purpose as required for notice under section 4444 of this title, and shall include findings regarding how the proposal: (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities." 1. Revise "mix of housing type" standards in the Southeast Quadrant to focus on style of building; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendment advances the Plan's recommendation to have different types of housing, defined as styles. The amendment continues to allow for a variety of housing types, defined as single-family, duplex, and multi-family housing, but does not specify whether these are recommended to be mixed within individual developments. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 2. Prohibit elective Planned Unit Development review on lots of less than two (2) acres in the R1, R1-LV, R2, R4, and LN zoning districts; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments advance goals of protecting existing neighborhoods from incompatible development. The amendment may affect the ability for some small 2 properties to build a second house in the rear or side of an existing house, or for small- lot "cottage housing" to be built as a PUD. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 3. Require a minimum road frontage of 50' on lots in the R1, R1-LV, R2, R4, and LN zoning districts; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments advance goals of protecting existing neighborhoods from incompatible development. The amendment may affect the ability for some small properties to build a second house in the rear or side of an existing house, or for small- lot "cottage housing"to be built as a PUD. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 4. Permit cannabis dispensaries (dispensing only) in the C1-R12, C1-R15, C1-Auto, C1-Air, CD-1, CD-2, CD-3, CD-4, SW, C2, and IC-TO zoning districts; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments are consistent with the Plan's goals of providing for diverse land uses and needs within the community. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. 3 (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 5. Permit cannabis dispensaries (cultivation only) in the IC and 10 zoning districts; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments are consistent with the Plan's goals of providing for diverse land uses and needs within the community. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 6. Allow for changes of use to all those allowed within the underlying zoning district for pre- existing buildings within the Interstate Overlay District; (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments are consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan to allow for orderly development and use of properties.The amendment may allow in some instances for housing to located in buildings that previously did not permit them. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 7. Amend Planning Commission terms and duties to be consistent with the City Charter; 8. Amend Temporary Uses Exempt from review to include all organizations and residents, and include outdoor events, not only outdoor "sales" events; 4 9. Adjust re-approval process for previously-approved Seasonal Mobile Food Units to allow for administrative re-approval; 10. Create a new use category for "indoor vehicle storage" permitted as an accessory use in the Mixed Industrial-Commercial District 11. Technical corrections related to the above amendments. For each of the above five (5) amendments, the proposed minor changes are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, have no anticipated effect on housing availability, are compatible with uses and densities in the Plan, and have no anticipated effect on planned communities facilities. 5