HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - City Council - 04/07/2009 0,4
io
southburlington
Charles E. Hafter, City Manager
AGENDA
SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL
TUTTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL LIBRARY
550 Dorset Street
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
Special Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tuesday, April 7, 2009
1) Pledge of Allegiance and Welcome (7:00pm)
2) Police Facility Work Plan Flow Chart: Councilor Knapp (7:05)
3) Background of development of plan for new Police Facility; Trevor Whipple, Chief
of Police (7:10)
4) Presentation of size needs and program functions for Police department facility;
Trevor Whipple (7:15)
5) Council questions on presentation (8:00)
6) Public questions and comments on presentation (8:20)
7) Presentation of cost and funding models for new facility; Chair Boucher and
City Manager Hafter (9:00)
8) Open discussion of issues related to costs (9:10)
* 9) Councilor Murray proposed resolution Authorizing Expenditure of Public Funds for
Professional Architectural Services and Outlining Schedule for Completion (9:45)
10)Adjourn
Respectfully Submitted:
CQ
Charles Ha e , City Manager
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
southrlingto"
Charles E. Hefter, City Manager
South Burlington City Council Resolution Authorizing
Expenditure of Public Funds for Professional Architectural
Services and Outlining Prospective Schedule for Completion
Whereas, South Burlington needs professional work space for its Police Department;
Whereas, South Burlington voters rejected plans for new space proposed by the City at
the City's Town Meeting in May 2006 and November 2008;
Whereas, South Burlington's police, fire and city hall presently share a single campus at
575 Dorset St., the strategic heart of the community;
Whereas, there are likely strategic, economic and operational benefits to the City by
keeping these three critical functions at 575 Dorset St;
Whereas, a comprehensive architectural assessment of the City's future space needs for
police, fire and city hall has never been completed;
Whereas, the City recently identified potential alternative sites for new police space, but
these sites have not been evaluated professionally by an architect;
Whereas, a comprehensive architectural assessment of the City's existing site and
structures for police, fire and city hall at 575 Dorset St. to determine whether structures
for the future needs of police, fire and city hall may be constructed there, and if so, the
cost therefore, has never been completed;
Whereas, the City's Police Department needs immediate relief from the lack of
professional space;
Now therefore be it resolved that South Burlington's City Council approves the attached
Request for Proposal for professional architectural services described therein.
Be it further resolved that the City Council proceed pursuant to the following schedule:
1. April 8, 2009 Council places advertisement for architectural services.
2. April 8, 2009 to April 23, 2009 City drafts contract for architectural services.
3. April 23, 2009 is deadline for receipt of proposals from architects.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
4. Between April 23, 2009 and May 7, 2009 Council investigates, interviews and
selects architect and executes contract.
5. May 8, 2009 architect begins comprehensive assessment pursuant to RFP, and
works with Council to provide professional modular space at 575 Dorset St. for
police and/or city hall. The latter space will be added by no later than June 1,
2009.
6. August 10, 2009 architect completes assessment and provides it to Council.
7. August 10, 2009 to September 22, 2009 Council conducts multiple public
meetings with architect, public and city employees to assess architect's
comprehensive assessment, conclusions and advice; and Council makes changes
and reaches final consensus for appropriate plan for design and construction of
any required municipal space for police, fire and/or city hall.
8. September 22, 2009 to October 27, 2009 architect will complete design
documents and City will complete contract documents for construction.
9. October 28, 2009 to December 15, 2009, public hearings and vote on Council's
plan for new police space.
10. December 16, 2009 Council will solicit bids for construction. Said bids to be
provided no later than January 11, 2009.
11. Council awards contract for construction on January 26, 2010.
12. Construction commences as soon as reasonable.
13. Construction estimated to be completed by no later than the end of December
2010.
ittet44
11111
south - J Eton
Charles E. Hatter, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
for
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
General Background Information
The City Council of South Burlington requests proposals from qualified architectural firms to
conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City's municipal space needs for police, fire and city
hall, whether these needs may be met at 575 Dorset St.,the current site for these municipal
services, either through expansion or all new construction,whether the latter location provides
strategic, economic and/or organizational benefits to the community or whether it would be better
to separate these functions at three locations, and whether there are deficiencies in structural,
mechanical and other systems recently at 575 Dorset St. and/or at other structures recently
identified as potential alternative sites for new police space. Please see a comprehensive outline
of architectural services requested below under"Scope of Services."
This request for this comprehensive assessment is being driven by inadequate police space. The
current 4000 square foot facility for police was built in 1982 for 28 employees, and the police
department presently has 50 officers. In 2007, a"City Police Facility Planning Sub-Committee"
described South Burlington's police station as"drastically beyond its intended occupancy." The
Council believes it has a duty to proceed expeditiously,albeit reasonably and professionally,to
remedy this situation.
The City Council has presented two plans for larger and improved police space to South
Burlington voters. Voters rejected the first proposal, prepared by Brian Humes, in May of 2006.
Mr. Humes' proposal was for 28,000 square feet, but the City Council reduced this proposal to
20,000 square feet and proposed to build it at the police station's present location. The second
proposal was based on a needs assessment by a Police Facility Planning Sub-Committee between
the fall of 2006 and the winter of 2007 and work by Arnold and Scangus, an architectural firm in
Colchester, VT that has designed Vermont's State Police barracks. This architectural work was
completed between March 2007 and June 2008. After study of an appropriate site by a
committee appointed by the City Council,the latter presented a 27,000 square foot police station
to the voters for their approval. This plan was to locate the new station on park land, which was
the former Caulkins farm at Dorset and Swift Streets. South Burlington voters rejected this plan
in November 2008.
Subsequent to the latter voter rejection,the City Manager retained a Buyer's Broker, and sought
proposals from owners of land,with and without existing facilities, in South Burlington for the
City to consider as sites for a new police facility. These sites were recently reported to the City
Council in executive session.
575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
The City Council is now considering construction of expanded space for its existing municipal
facilities for police, fire and city hall presently located at 575 Dorset Street. There are a number
of possible options,which follow:
1. Additions and renovations to the existing facility at 575 Dorset Street to
accommodate police, fire and city hall at said location;
2. Demolition of part or all of the structure that houses police, fire and City Hall, and
construction of new facilities for these three functions at 575 Dorset Street;
3. Splitting the location of police,fire and city hall by keeping fire at 575 Dorset St.,
and moving police and city hall to new sites.
Scope of Services
The City Council requests proposals from qualified architectural firms to provide their costs to do
the following:
[1] design, estimate cost and help construct temporary, modular, professional work space
for the police at 575 Dorset while the City Council works with the City's architect and
voters to design a permanent solution for professional space; [2] evaluate, determine and
prioritize current and future needs over the next 5, 15 and 20 years for police, fire and
city hall; [3] conduct a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of South Burlington's
existing police, fire and city hall facilities to determine whether they have any
deficiencies in their architectural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection,
technology, hazardous materials and structural systems; [4] determine whether and, if so,
how the existing facilities for these services may be expanded, as well as the cost to do so
compared with the cost for all new construction; [5] conduct the same comprehensive
evaluation of the systems referred to in the preceding item for up to two other existing
structures that City Council is considering as options to the existing campus for police,
determine whether these facilities may be converted to a police station and if so explain
and describe how and provide the cost to do so; [6] determine whether or not there likely
would be immediate and/or long term cost savings by either keeping police,fire and city
hall at 575 Dorset or separating them at three sites, and if there could be any savings,
explain what these savings would be; [7] prepare a written narrative of these findings, as
well as preliminary building diagrams and designs and meet with the public and City
Council no less than five times to present these matters and advise the public and Council
as to matters pertinent to this scope of services and thereafter make amendments to said
diagrams and designs to accommodate changes directed by the Council.
Time for Completion of Services outlined above
The scope of services outlined above must be completed within three months from the date of the
City's award of the contract.
Time for Submitting bid
The City Council requests that architectural firms respond to this request by delivering their
proposals to the City Council, c/o Mr. Charles Hafter, South Burlington City Manager, City Hall,
575 Dorset St., Attention Facility RFP, South Burlington, VT 05403 by no later than 5 p.m. on
April 22, 2009. No faxed, emailed or late proposals will be accepted. The City will not be
responsible for proposals placed in the mail which do not arrive by the deadline. Proposals
received before the deadline will be kept by the City manager unopened until 5 p.m. on April 22,
2009. All proposals shall be opened at the City Manager's office at that time. Proposals received
after the deadline will be returned unopened. All questions relating to the RFP are to be
addressed to Mr. Hafter.All proposals submitted shall become the property of the City of South
Burlington. Prospective architects must identify in writing all proprietary, copyrighted or other
trade secrets, and must agree in writing to hold the City harmless for its refusal to disclose said
information. Failure to include such a statement will be a waiver of a right to an exemption from
disclosure. If it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFP, addenda will be supplied to all
firms who have responded.
Required Elements for Proposal Packages
The prospective Project Architects must submit the following as part of their proposal packages:
1. For the principal firm as well as all others who will work on performing the services
delineated in the Scope of Services: documentation as a registered architect; a statement
of qualifications; a list and description of experiences in the areas of public building,
planning and design; special qualifications and achievements; and three references,with
contact information, including phone number.
2. A detailed statement of the architect's work plan or approach to the tasks and description
of services to be provided as outlined in the Scope of Services; a statement of the
prospective architect's suitability for the assignment; a detailed scheduling plan; and any
other and additional information deemed appropriate.
3. A fee for completing the Scope of Services, and said fee should include all estimated time
and out of pocket expenses, unless explicitly stated and explained in the proposal; if the
prospective architects propose an hourly compensation rate, said proposal must include
out of pocket expenses in said rate and indicate the number of hours it will be necessary
to complete said work.
Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria:
1. Professional background and prior experience.
2. Past public and private experience.
3. Understanding of the project.
4. Financial stability.
5. Qualifications of the professional and other consultants who will work on the project.
6. Capability of the prospective architect to timely complete the work.
7. Compliance with the RFP.
8. Cost.
9. Interviews with selected prospective architects.
10. Any other criteria that the City deems appropriate.
Proposed Police Station Sites
December 2008
Permanent Location
1. VT Commercial: Goodrich site at corner of Kennedy Drive/
Hinesburg Rd. Previously permitted for 3 stories
general office building, 240'1sq. feet, 95 parking
spaces; 1.38 acres
2. Malone Properties: 222 Dorset Street, lot north of Healthy Living,
3 acres and 3 homes fronting on Dorset St.
3. Champlain Oil Co.: 45 San Remo Drive, access to Dorset St., 2.5
acres, 18,000 sq. feet in two buildings, not
available for several years.
4. Ed Welch 340 Dorset Street (former Rent-All) and related
buildings, long-term lease
x 5. 835 Hinesburg Road, LLC Hill Farm, Hinesburg Road (east of Village at
Dorset Park), 3-5 acre subdivision.
6. O'Brien Realty 472 Meadowlands Dr., up to 20,000 sq. feet
in modules, 40 parking spaces.
7. O'Brien Realty Lot across from 70 Kimball Av. (INS building),
up to 37 acres.
8. O'Brien Realty Lot 2, second lot east of Kimball Ave/Old Farm
Rd., 5.5 acres.
9. O'Brien Realty Lot on Kennedy Dr. adjacent to Windridge
Condominiums, 34.5 acres, zoned residential.
10. Tech Park Lot 5, northeast corner of Technology Park
at intersection with Kimball Ave., 7.5 acres.
11. R.E.M. (Robert Miller) 19 Gregory Dr., former Reprographics Building
41,000 sq feet, 3.76 acres, abundant parking
12. Chase Properties 3 Green Tree Dr., existing 20,000 sq feet building,
(up to 27,900 possible) Tri-Tek building, 40 parking
spaces, 2.14 acres.
13. Pizzagalli 193 Tilly Dr, new construction, 30,000 sq. feet
7.86 acres, long-term lease
14. Pizzagalli 72 San Remo Dr., 3.15 acres, 19,000 sq. feet
in three buildings (warehouse)
15. Eastern Development Corp. K-Mart Plaza, Shelburne Rd., former Martin's
Drugstore space.
Proposed Police Station Sites
December 2008
Temporary Locations
16. Judge Development Corp Former Healthy Living, Market Street, 8,500 sq. ft.
17. O'Brien Realty 472 Meadowlands Dr., (see above)
18. Tech Park 55 Community Drive, for City Offices, sufficient
size, parking
19. R.E.M. (Robert Miller) 19 Gregory Drive (see above)
20. Eastern Dev. Corp. K-Mart Plaza (see above)
21. J.L. Davis 78 Ethan Allen Dr., 10,000-13,600 sq. feet,
30 parking spaces
22. Jeff Nick 7 Green Tree Dr., 8,700 to 11,600 sq. feet,
25 parking spaces
City of South Burlington
Process and Analysis for the
Site Selection of New Police
Facility
7�.
4
t
Background of Site Selection Proces �.
• Following defeat of Calkins site, Council accepted
leadership role in process
• Proposals sought from private land owners for
permanent and temporary sites
• 575 Dorset remains a viable option
2
1
Results of Request for
Proposals for Site
• 15 permanent and 7 temporary sites proposed, no
costs solicited
• Sites presented at public meeting
• Council solicited bids from preferred sites
3
10,
Review Cost Proposals
• Four permanent sites and two temporary sites
respond with cost proposals
• Two open land- one in City Center
• Two existing buildings
• Two temporary sites in existing locations
• Council reviewed in executive session
4
2
After reviewing proposals and discussion with
owners, two best sites are:
• Current 575 Dorset Street location
• 19 Gregory Drive, former Resolution Building,
owned by Robert Miller (REM Development)
f ;
P
� yK u
(1) 575 Dorset Street (2) 19 Gregory Drive
ayy
fy�
(1)
6
3
y Current Location:
,y� • Complete rebuild with three storyfootprint
•�� p p
• Temporary relocation of Police and City Hall functions during
construction
• 24 months Police relocation, minimum 4 years City Hall
relocation
• Building cost: $9.1 million (includes fit-up, special costs)
• Relocation: $2.5 million
• Total $11.6 million
it it
.,,,,,.„,.•,. .„....„1.,,„„,K,.:,,,...„,„,,..,..„... :,,•...,:,,,.,....„.„,,,...,:.::....:..„,,...,,.,:,.....„....:..:,.„ .,. ...,.,,......„..:.„:„.,....,: ::..,,...„,.:...:._ ,,.:.,,,„,,,,,...„;,..,„,,„:. ...:. .:.:...... ,..:,:......._,
..,„..,,,,,:„. „:„.,,,.oitimr:k-e504,;.,f;J•.-:..k....,Ettivi t,:.-_:14N.,..•%•• \liti.,,,, ..,,: ..,:;..•
..gyp ''''
s ..�` e a4 -g
F 7 ark y s ,
§8 9'
.I.;.-
' a I ' P ,.4
• .,,,,.•..,..i.i.; ..,
bc •
u;te '.. e1 � ,, ,.,.,„;,.ii-s:,,,:t#:,;:',.:.;:.':'..r.'•-':'' '- ' —' ''''''''::::::::::''''''''''':1/2'ilill:P:!::''''''''':'... :''j';'''';'''°'I'':' ''';''''':':'J:'''''11:':'''''''''''''''''- cjr
4
19 Gregory Drive (REM) Proposal:
• 45,049 square foot building
• City to purchase 33,224 S.F.
• Remaining 11,825 S.F. leased to private sector company.
• REM will hold, but pay down cost using lease funds on
same funding basis as purchase. City will obtain at no-cost
after 20 years or for remaining amortization at any time.
REM assumes risk.
• 3.76 acres, and abundance of parking
9
REM proposal costs:
• Purchase of 33,224 S.F. for $4.4 million
• Eventual ownership of remainder of building
• Fit-up: $1.850 million
• Special costs: $.95 million
• Total cost $7.2 million
10 '
5
19 Gregory Drive
'•;.N>,` ' ,,,..,- '419.4 .'7,-,,,, %.,-;' .
,-
:'''%'" . .`,',:i0.TIri '-''.::;01!:‘'-:,1-'4,,;•:‘, , ,,,, '.', ; '- '
.., ;-:,-:,?4,1i11—--Z. ,.„.;,,, .,:•" , t-- , ..
.. , ., -,,,:1, .....- 2--- - •
_ ..
. .
u,,,,,- -
„.. .., c
•
,,, ..:.,';',/,'•a•:',,,,,,74::-1-'si-a
_..........___,
,4j".;47:114,1 ''
13 -
<44.>'''
1 1 •
Raw Land in City Center
• Proposalto
rtithy Centerreeacr.e wsoafsras .5.s3 io
raw land million
adjacent
c dollars for excellent site.
e.
12
6
4 s
-so No
Site Evaluation: poi,
575 Dorset Street .
Pros:
• Central Location
• Traditional location of public service
• City Center concept
• Maintain Emergency Services coordination
• Near main school campus
13
410
Site Evaluation:
575 Dorset Street
Cons:
• Three story-footprint needed for parking- impacts
work flow
• Temporary Relocation with no defined solution
for City Hall
• Fewer options for future conditions, requires new
City Hall sooner
• Loss of 17,000 s.f. of current space for other uses
in future
14 ! • Cost
7
,104,401
Site Evaluation:
19 Gregory Drive
Pros:
• Flexibility for future police needs, opportunity for
lease revenue to help pay Debt Service costs
• State permits already exist, minimum risk
• Six months to occupancy
• Allows renovated City Hall, potential for shared
services with school administration, finances; can
delay new City Hall decision
15 • No need for temporary relocation hassles and costs
Site Evaluation:
19 Gregory Drive
._.....:..
Cons:
• Located on periphery of City
• Does not support City Center concept
• Takes portion of 19 Gregory off tax roll
16
8
Cost Impacts on Average
Home Bottom Line: y„
Cost for average home ($316,000)
19 Gregory 575 Dorset
1st year cost $75.42 $121.51
Average annual cost (20 yrs) $52.55 $ 84.67
With use of$500,000 Rooms and Meals annual appropriation,
$500,000 R&M down payment, and R&M phase out:
1st year cost $ 11.99 $58.08
Average annual cost $ 2.45 29.57
17
Greater financing, amortization
detail available on city web site:
www.sburl.com
18
9
Population
Projection
Needs Current
Assessment"------ Statistics
Force
Projection
alidate Space
Detail City Council Needs
,l Public Meetings
1/space ExistingN Chief's g
Planning Studies Presentation e.
A&S CV
Public Final
Meeting Package
Site
/Prelim Site Selection
Selection /Final City
Executive Session Preferred Site Council
/ Letter of Intent Public Hearings
Site
Selection Information
Packages
Finance
Alternatives
jblic Outreach
Local Meetings
/Reorganize
/// Current ----
Web Information
Public
Outreach
.. - .. .. a
1.0'iikl‘. vilr,
`s ` , .
Fk. 411 1 ., :. Page 2
ri,'.4 W e had:included a 1,250 addition as part of the sally port area which is not included in the above
t.. � n umbel s.
E ._x
' It is my understanding the goal would he to get to around 28.000 S.F. This would leave surplus
P ;spaec of approximately 5,000 S.F.
r Wit`".- Metwe discussed.financing options and:methods "1'he follots�ing is. hat was agreed to as an
V. .. :fir' eq ';AkS a " xd $
,, ' �> I. The six Million ($6,000,000.00) would he split into two (2) parts:
i.,.,
a.) $4,400,000.00 for the 33,224 S.F. "as is" space for thepolice department.the
�� � .a�, :' p p`
7. to principal i.e,: $4,400,000.00 will he divided into (20) annual payments of
r
: $220,000.00. 'Ihe annual interest rate will be 4% fixed for the first five (5) years,
principal and interest payments will he made on a quarterly basis.
Asa i� r.
�`.�� b,) $ .f�Ott.C?(10.0(l for the 1 18?5. S.F. that is leased and will be controlled by R..l:.h�f
Developn5ent. It ill be structured on the sane basis (20)annual p
" _ avrrrents of
� $80,000.00 with an interest rate of 4% fixed for the first five (5) years paid on a
1 n ipifj cluartcrly hasls
:6---. • •,, c) The city willhave the right Co purchase the property wrtl no prepayment penalty
t,l3 y, Zle anytmie during:the-last five years at the principal balances at that time
i, try .: .: .
i'i<,r } t X « d.) R.F.. 'hT)c elop icn.t Co.; LLC Will ofler the same terms on the lieu of the space;.
��<44�e.
e.) REM Development Co., LLC will be allowed to factor interest of 4% on the
$4,400.000.00 front April l 1. 2009 as part of this proposal.
4} � f.) At the end of the first five years, if the city has not exercised its option to purchase.
. �, _ the developer will seek new financing tends .from a local bank or banks, the then rate
and term will replace the °i9 used for the first five years.
f
g.) If the parties go f'orw and with this proposal it will require it to he in legal form
t_ acceptable to both parties.
. , The information herein is presented to the City.ofi, ,ot h Burlington as a further inducement. but
�°�}s in rio g ay commits either pasty until legal doctirnerits'are;prepared and executed.
iiiiitel3 :.n �� s .-+x} i. ,r ii, ..2" �r h s fir':.
t #a y
Page 3
We will continue to assist in any wav we can to make this a successful project.
Sincerely,
Rohe t N. hillier
P csident
t�I. .l`l;3
rt: N1;1,c Sinioneaci
8 3
ment
CompmsLLC COMMERCIAL AND INDUST IAL LEASING AND DEVELOPMENT
March 4. 2009
Charles Ilafter
City; Imager
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
�ttl
:.; Re: Proposed South Burlington Police Station
19 Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT
l)car Cheek:
In response to the R.F.P u c offered to sell 19 Gregory Drive "as is"for$6.000.00.0.00. We also
offered to do a Lease with the option to purchase. but with no detail.
During the week of'February 21. 2009 hile can vacation 1 recci:ed a call from Mike Sinzoneau
requesting further details on how I would he willing to structure a lease purchase option. I
suggested that 1 would he back in Burlington on 1 ebruar}' 28. 2009. As you know a meeting was
scheduled for vrionday March 2. 2009 for 9:30 :1\-1 at Cit:: 1lall with the following persons hi
ittendrince: Chuck Hoffer. Town Manager. 1-rcvor 1,AWhipple. Police Chief. Mike Sinloneau.
Project Consultant. Bob Miller,R.L.:M Detielopment Co._ LLC. and 1'im
Development Co., LLC.
[he plans vwere reviewed and Chuck questioned whether the amount of space could be reduced,
and could the city lease out surplus space until needed?
suggested that the plans we are reviewing came out of our interpretation of the R.F.P. and if our
site is selected our arthuect would work with the committee to reduce the footprint.
I vti ould like to recap the existing building footprint:
floor 23,474 S.F.
-
2 llot>r --- 21,625 S.F.
g.,41 Total 45.099 S.F.
The exit ins 2'1 floor lease space is -11.875 S.F
Balance 1=or Police Dept. Use 33.224 S.F.
7-4
Avenue D,Wiitfstcn.V: 05495 v t802) 864-583-0 F,(802) 8ry.4 172 i.�t� �.iem dev ioprn r7c,car,,
City of South Burlington
Police Building Amortization Information
19 Gregory Drive 575 Dorset Street
Cost $ 7,200,000 $ 11,600,000
20-Year Bond 4.00% 4.00%
1st Year Debt Service $ 648,000 $ 1,044,000
Average Annual Debt Servcice $ 518,400 $ 835,200
Incremental Tax Rate 1st year 0.0239 0.0385
Incremental Cost Average Home ($316,000) $ 75.42 $ 121.51
Average Annual Cost over bond life $ 52.55 $ 84.67
Appropriation of Rooms and Meals Tax $500.000/year
1st Year Debt Service $ 148,000 $ 535,000
Average Annual Debt Servcice $ 13,400 $ 320,500
Incremental Tax Rate 1st year 0.0055 0.0197
Incremental Cost Average Home ($316,000) $ 17.22 $ 62.27
Average Annual Cost over bond life $ 1.36 $ 32.49
Rooms and Meals Phase-out when Debt Service under$500,000
1st Year Debt Service $ 148,000 $ 535,000
Average Annual Debt Servcice $ 44,000 $ 320,500
Incremental Tax Rate 1st year 0.0055 0.0197
Incremental Cost Average Home ($316,000) $ 17.22 $ 62.27
Average Annual Cost over bond life $ 4.46 $ 32.49
City of South Burlington
Total Option Costs Required Expenses
19 Gregory Drive $ 7,200,000 Building W/Fitup
2,500,000 Renovations to City Hall
$ 9,700,000
575 Dorset Street $ 11,600,000 Police Retrofit/Temporary City Hall (4-yrs)
$5-$7,000,000 New City Hall
$16,6-$18,600,000
Y City of South Burlington
` Analysis of Debt Service Costs with Appropriation of Rooms and Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ 7,200,000
Interest: 4.00%
Period: 20.00
AI oly R&M Incremental Tax Grand List
based on G.L. escalated at 1.5Yy
1 FY 10 144 000 ' , AA'5.e 5., 44,000 0.0016 26,750,000
2 FY 11 648 000 ', a i i i a 148,000 0.0055 27,151,250
3 FY 12 633,600 m a`5'a e° 133,600 0.0048 27,558,519
4 FY 13 619,200 i i i o i, 119,200 0.0043 27,971,897
5 FY 14 604,800 ' 'Se a 00 104,800 0.0037 28,391,475
6 FY 15 590,400 500000> 90,400 0.0031 28,817,347
7 FY 16 576,000 500,000 76,000 0.0026 29,249,607
8 FY 17 561,600 500,000 61,600 0.0021 29,688,351
9 FY 18 547,200 500000 47,200 0.0016 30,133,677
10 FY 19 532,800., 500,000 32,800 0.0011 30,585,682
11 FY 20 518,400' :'500,000:= 18,400 0.0006 31,044,467
12 FY 21 504 000 '4e ,500,900 4,000 0.0001 31,510,134
13 FY 22 489,600� 500 000 -10,400 -0.0003 31,982,786
14 FY 23 475,200 i e 0OQ -24,800 -0.0008 32,462,528
15 FY 24 460,800, I.i e n 0 -39,200 -0.0012 32,949,466
16 FY25 446,400 ,ie i -53,600 -0.0016 33,443,708
17 FY 26 432,000 'r 4-50R,000' -68,000 -0.0020 33,945,363
18 FY 27 417,600 - 500000 -82,400 -0.0024 34,454,544
19 FY 28 403,200 500 000 -96,800 -0.0028 34,971,362
20 FY 29 388,800 500000 -111,200 -0.0031 35,495,932
21 FY 30 374,400 500; -125,600 -0.0035 36,028,371
10.368.000 268,000
31,170,784
First Year I Per month $ 12,333
First Year I Annually $ 148,000 $5.45 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 21 $ 13,400 $0.43 per$100,000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax Bill 17 0.31%
5,569
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
City of South Burlington
Analysis of Debt Service Costs with Appropriation of Rooms and Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ 7,200,000
Interest: 4.00%
Period: 20.00
Incremental Tax Grand List
Pr.Bal. Pr.Pmt. Int.Pmt. Tot.Pmt. Pr.Bal. based on G.L. escalated at 1.5%
1 FY 10 7,200,000 0 144,000 144,000 7,200,000 0.0054 26,750,000
2 FY 11 7,200,000 360,000 288,000 648,000 6,840,000 0.0239 27,151,250
3 FY 12 6,840,000 360,000 273,600 633,600 6,480,000 0.0230 27,558,519
4 FY 13 6,480,000 360,000 259,200 619,200 6,120,000 0.0221 27,971,897
5 FY 14 6,120,000 360,000 244,800 604,800 5,760,000 0.0213 28,391,475
6 FY 15 5,760,000 360,000 230,400 590,400 5,400,000 0.0205 28,817,347
7 FY 16 5,400,000 360,000 216,000 576,000 5,040,000 0.0197 29,249,607
8 FY 17 5,040,000 360,000 201,600 561,600 4,680,000 0.0189 29,688,351
9 FY 18 4,680,000 360,000 187,200 547,200 4,320,000 0.0182 30,133,677
10 FY 19 4,320,000 360,000 172,800 532,800 3,960,000 0.0174 30,585,682
11 FY 20 3,960,000 360,000 158,400 518,400 3,600,000 0.0167 31,044,467
12 FY21 3,600,000 360,000 144,000 504,000 3,240,000 0.0160 31,510,134
13 FY 22 3,240,000 360,000 129,600 489,600 2,880,000 0.0153 31,982,786
14 FY 23 2,880,000 360,000 115,200 475,200 2,520,000 0.0146 32,462,528
15 FY 24 2,520,000 360,000 100,800 460,800 2,160,000 0.0140 32,949,466
16 FY25 2,160,000 360,000 86,400 446,400 1,800,000 0.0133 33,443,708
17 FY 26 1,800,000 360,000 72,000 432,000 1,440,000 0.0127 33,945,363
18 FY 27 1,440,000 360,000 57,600 417,600 1,080,000 0.0121 34,454,544
19 FY 28 1,080,000 360,000 43,200 403,200 720,000 0.0115 34,971,362
20 FY 29 720,000 360,000 28,800 388,800 360,000 0.0110 35,495,932
21 FY 30 360,000 360,000 14,400 374,400 0 0.0104 36,028,371
7.200.000 3.168.000 10.368.000
31,170,784
First Year Cost= Per month $ 54,000
First Year Cost= Annually $ 648,000 $23.87 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 20 years $ 518,400 $16.63 per$100,000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax BIll _ 75 1.36%
5,628
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
City of South Burlington
Analysis of Debt Service-Proposed Financing after Appropriation of Rooms Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ 11,600,000
Interest: 4.00%0
Period: 20.00
Apply R&M Incremental Tax Grand List
Tot.Pmt, based on G.L. escalated at 1.5%
1 FY 10 230,000 ,.1gO;Oi tf 80,000 0.0030 26,750,000
2 FY 11 1,035,000 500,000' 535,000 0.0197 27,151,250
3 FY 12 1,012,000 500,000': 512,000 0.0186 27,558,519
4 FY 13 989,000 500,000 489,000 0.0175 27,971,897
5 FY 14 966,000 500,000 466,000 0.0164 28,391,475
6 FY 15 943,000 500,000; 443,000 0.0154 28,817,347
7 FY 16 920,000 500,000r. 420,000 0.0144 29,249,607
8 FY 17 897,000 500,000''' 397,000 0.0134 29,688,351
9 FY 18 874 000 500,000 374,000 0.0124 30,133,677
10 FY 19 851,000 500,000' 351,000 0.0115 30,585,682
11 FY 20 828,000 " 500,000 328,000 0.0106 31,044,467
12 FY 21 805,000 500,000`; 305,000 0.0097 31,510,134
13 FY 22 782,000 " 500,000'' 282,000 0.0088 31,982,786
14 FY 23 759,000 500 000 259,000 0.0080 32,462,528
15 FY 24 736,000 r 500,000 236,000 0.0072 32,949,466
16 FY25 713,000 500,000'r 213,000 0.0064 33,443,708
17 FY 26 690,000 500,000' 190,000 0.0056 33,945,363
18 FY 27 667,000 500,000 167,000 0.0048 34,454,544
19 FY 28 644,000 500,000 1'' 144,000 0.0041 34,971,362
20 FY 29 621 000 500,000s 121,000 0.0034 35,495,932
21 FY 30 598,000 500,000, 98,000 0.0027 36,028,371
16.560,000 6,410,000
31,170,784
First Year I Per month $ 44,583
First Year I Annually $ 535,000 $19,70 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 20 $ 320,500 $10,28 per$100,000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax Bill 62 1.12%
5,614
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
City of South Burlington
Analysis of Debt Service-Proposed Financing after Appropriation of Rooms Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ - ,a,T1,600 000:°
Interest: 4.00%
Period: 20.00
Incremental Tax Grand List
Pr.Bal. Pr.Pmt. Int.Pmt. Tot.Pmt. Pr.Bal. based on G.L. escalated at 1.5%
1 FY 10 11,600,000 0 232,000 232,000 11,600,000 0.0087 26,750,000
2 FY 11 11,600,000 580,000 464,000 1,044,000 11,020,000 0.0385 27,151,250
3 FY 12 11,020,000 580,000 440,800 1,020,800 10,440,000 0.0370 27,558,519
4 FY 13 10,440,000 580,000 417,600 997,600 9,860,000 0.0357 27,971,897
5 FY 14 9,860,000 580,000 394,400 974,400 9,280,000 0.0343 28,391,475
6 FY 15 9,280,000 580,000 371,200 951,200 8,700,000 0.0330 28,817,347
7 FY 16 8,700,000 580,000 348,000 928,000 8,120,000 0.0317 29,249,607
8 FY 17 8,120,000 580,000 324,800 904,800 7,540,000 0.0305 29,688,351
9 FY 18 7,540,000 580,000 301,600 881,600 6,960,000 0.0293 30,133,677
10 FY 19 6,960,000 580,000 278,400 858,400 6,380,000 0.0281 30,585,682
11 FY 20 6,380,000 580,000 255,200 835,200 5,800,000 0.0269 31,044,467
12 FY 21 5,800,000 580,000 232,000 812,000 5,220,000 0.0258 31,510,134
13 FY 22 5,220,000 580,000 208,800 788,800 4,640,000 0.0247 31,982,786
14 FY 23 4,640,000 580,000 185,600 765,600 4,060,000 0.0236 32,462,528
15 FY 24 4,060,000 580,000 162,400 742,400 3,480,000 0.0225 32,949,466
16 FY25 3,480,000 580,000 139,200 719,200 2,900,000 0.0215 33,443,708
17 FY 26 2,900,000 580,000 116,000 696,000 2,320,000 0.0205 33,945,363
18 FY 27 2,320,000 580,000 92,800 672,800 1,740,000 0.0195 34,454,544
19 FY 28 1,740,000 580,000 69,600 649,600 1,160,000 0.0186 34,971,362
20 FY 29 1,160,000 580,000 46,400 626,400 580,000 0.0176 35,495,932
21 FY 30 580,000 580,000 23,200 603,200 0 0.0167 36,028,371
•
11.600.000 5.104.000 16.704.000
31,170,784
First Year Cost= Per month $ 87,000
-- First Year Cost= Annually $ 1,044,000 $38.45 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 20 years $ 835,200 $26.79 per$100.000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax Bill 122 2.19%
5,674
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
City of South Burlington
Analysis of Debt Service Costs with Appropriation of Rooms and Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ 7,200,000
Interest: 4.00%
Period: 20.00
Apply R&M Incremental Tax Grand List
based on G.L. escalated at 1.5%
1 FY 10 144,000, . ' ,100,000 44,000 0.0016 26,750,000
2 FY 11 648,000- 500,000` 148,000 0.0055 27,151,250
3 FY 12 633,600 , ,'500,000, 133,600 0.0048 27,558,519
4 FY 13 619,200 . 500,000' 119,200 0.0043 27,971,897
5 FY 14 604,800 ` - 500,000 104,800 0.0037 28,391,475
6 FY 15 590,400 500,000 90,400 0.0031 28,817,347
7 FY 16 576,000 500,000 76,000 0.0026 29,249,607
8 FY 17 561,600 500,000 61,600 0.0021 29,688,351
9 FY 18 547,200 500,000 47,200 0.0016 30,133,677
10 FY 19 532,800 500,000- 32,800 0.0011 30,585,682
11 FY 20 518,400' 500,000 18,400 0.0006 31,044,467
12 FY 21 504,000" 500,000 4,000 0.0001 31,510,134
13 FY 22 489,600 - 489600 0 0.0000 31,982,786
14 FY 23 475,200: 475,200- 0 0.0000 32,462,528
15 FY 24 460,800 460,800 0 0.0000 32,949,466
16 FY25 446,400 446,4(4 0 0.0000 33,443,708
17 FY 26 432,000 ."432,000= 0 0.0000 33,945,363
18 FY 27 417 600 " 417,600' 0 0.0000 34,454,544
19 FY 28 403,200 403,200d+ 0 0.0000 34,971,362
20 FY 29 388,800 388,800' 0 0.0000 35,495,932
21 FY 30 374,400 374400' 0 0.0000 36,028,371
10.368.000 880.000
31,170,784
First Year I Per month $ 12,333
First Year I Annually $ 148,000 $5.45 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 2( $ 44,000 $1.41 per$100.000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax Bill 17 0.31%
5,569
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
w
City of South Burlington
• Analysis of Debt Service Costs with Appropriation of Rooms and Meals Tax Revenues
Principal: $ 7,200,000
Interest: 4.00%
Period: 20.00
Incremental Tax Grand List
Pr.Bal. Pr.Pmt. Int.Pmt. Tot.Pmt. Pr.Bal. based on G.L. escalated at 1.5%
1 FY 10 7,200,000 0 144,000 144,000 7,200,000 0.0054 26,750,000
2 FY 11 7,200,000 360,000 288,000 648,000 6,840,000 0.0239 27,151,250
3 FY 12 6,840,000 360,000 273,600 633,600 6,480,000 0.0230 27,558,519
4 FY 13 6,480,000 360,000 259,200 619,200 6,120,000 0.0221 27,971,897
5 FY 14 6,120,000 360,000 244,800 604,800 5,760,000 0.0213 28,391,475
6 FY 15 5,760,000 360,000 230,400 590,400 5,400,000 0.0205 28,817,347
7 FY 16 5,400,000 360,000 216,000 576,000 5,040,000 0.0197 29,249,607
8 FY 17 5,040,000 360,000 201,600 561,600 4,680,000 0.0189 29,688,351
9 FY 18 4,680,000 360,000 187,200 547,200 4,320,000 0.0182 30,133,677
10 FY 19 4,320,000 360,000 172,800 532,800 3,960,000 0.0174 30,585,682
11 FY 20 3,960,000 360,000 158,400 518,400 3,600,000 0.0167 31,044,467
12 FY 21 3,600,000 360,000 144,000 504,000 3,240,000 0.0160 31,510,134
13 FY 22 3,240,000 360,000 129,600 489,600 2,880,000 0.0153 31,982,786
14 FY 23 2,880,000 360,000 115,200 475,200 2,520,000 0.0146 32,462,528
15 FY 24 2,520,000 360,000 100,800 460,800 2,160,000 0.0140 32,949,466
16 FY25 2,160,000 360,000 86,400 446,400 1,800,000 0.0133 33,443,708
17 FY 26 1,800,000 360,000 72,000 432,000 1,440,000 0.0127 33,945,363
18 FY 27 1,440,000 360,000 57,600 417,600 1,080,000 0.0121 34,454,544
19 FY 28 1,080,000 360,000 43,200 403,200 720,000 0.0115 34,971,362
20 FY 29 720,000 360,000 28,800 388,800 360,000 0.0110 35,495,932
21 FY 30 360,000 360,000 14,400 374,400 0 0.0104 36,028,371
7.200.000 3.168.000 10.368.000
31,170,784
First Year Cost= Per month $ 54,000
First Year Cost= Annually $ 648,000 $23.87 per$100,000 assessed value
Average Annual Cost over 20 years $ 518,400 $16.63 per$100,000 assessed value
Annual Cost to Average Home 316,000
Increase over 2010
Current Tax Rate 1.757
Current Property Tax 5,552
%Increase Total Tax Bill 75 1.36%
5,628
Assumes 1.5%grand list growth; Assumes no outside contributions
South Burlington Police Station
Permanent Options Comparison
Temporary
Option Land Building Relocation Costs Total
(1)
O'Brien $998,500 $8,931,449 None $9,929,949
Malone $2,600,000 $8,931,449 None $11,531,449
(2)
Pizzagalli INCLUDED $4,435,000(28,643 @ 155/SF) None
$1,575,365(28,643 @ 55/SF)
$6,010,365(28,643 @ 210/SF) -
mov
$950,0 0(Furnishings, Phone,Security) rO,q�`p
Total: ..6617)00 (3) $7,060,000
94,12,07-'70
Miller INCLUDED $4,400,000(33,224 @ 132/SF) None
$1,827,320 (33,224 @ 55/SF)
$6,207,320(33,224 @ 187/SF)
$950,000(Furnishings,Phone,Security)
Total: $7,177,320 (3) $7,177,320
•
So. Burlington INCLUDED $8,931,449 $439,778—>$744,416 2 years rent&fit-up for police (4)
$-315,000 Saving for Radio System,Tower,Landscaping $250,000-->$250,000 Specialized costs $11,457,227-->
$+506,000 Expenses for demolition and site improvements $667,000 City Hall;4 years Rent for 11 0 SF @$14.50/SF NNN $11,761,865
Total: $9,122,449 $253,000 City Hall;4 years C.A.M. $5. 0 SF
$575,000 City Hall Fit-Up for 11,500 SF @$50 SF
$150,000 City Hall Specialized Costs,Vault
Total: $2,334,778-->$2,639,416
(1)See total estimated project cost per Arnold&Scangas,June 16,2008,which included contingencies:
(2)Purchase cost has been determined for comparison purposes only. Owner has proposed a lease and not an outright purchase.
(3)See separate comparison of Pizzagalli and REM lease proposals
(4)See Temporay Options Comparison