Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - City Council - 07/21/2008 +��USM{UILLINGrot Vt9 J' N. City of South Burlington 419' r/,I •��.�,,��I;� 575 DORSET STREET /1 i ;-iF.�, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 �•`-'t�, 1. TEL. (802) 846-4107 ��,� •`+ FAX (802) 846-4101 M t'dht6 A TOWN M'aGSVS.; AGER CHARLES ECITY NHAFTER AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT EXECUTIVE SESSION 5:30 P.M. Monday, July 21, 2008 * 1) Consider entering executive session to discuss litigation and real property acquisition SPECIAL MEETING 6:30pm Monday, July 21, 2008 * 1) City Council site visit at 725 Hinesburg Rd. Northwest corner of Hinesburg Rd and 1-89 for purpose of condemnation of property. REGULAR SESSION 7:00PM Monday, July 21, 2008 1)Comments and Questions from the public(not related to the Agenda). 2)Announcements and City Manager's Report. 3)Discussion of site visit to Allen Road Land Company/Exit 12B and process for condemnation; Steve Stitzel, City Attorney * 4)Discussion of fencing used on Kennedy Drive project to secure stormwater ponds; Lorraine Berkett, Winding Brook resident * 5)Discussion of voting date for"Use of Calkin" question; Consideration of approval of Resolution and Warning for Special City Meeting on September 9, 2008 to consider same * 6)Consideration of ballot schedule for recommended amendments to the Charter from City Charter Review/Update Committee * 7)Consideration of changing the Annual City Meeting date from the third Tuesday in May to the first Tuesday in March; Scheduling of Public Hearing for same(suggest September 2, 2008). * 8)Request from Jeff Nick, Green Mountain Delta Holding LLC for return of 60' ROW between 6 and 7 Green Tree Drive to adjourning property owners * 9)Consideration of approval of Resolution Establishing Reserve Fund for Rooms, Meals and Alcoholic Beverage Tax Revenues * 10) Review of Police Department Mission Statement development and visionary process. * 11) Approval of Resolution of National Night Out; Proclaiming Tuesday, August 5th, 2008 as National Night Out in South Burlington, VT * 12) Review agenda for Planning Commission meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 22, 2008. Page 1 AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT * 13) Review and approve minutes from regular City Council meeting held on June 16, 2008. * 14) Review and approve minutes from special City Council meeting held on July 2, 2008. I` ) 0, ‘c(. I 'VI 15) Sign disbursement orders. 16) Adjourn Respectfully Submitted: 0.c^�> Cafter, City Ma ger Page 2 Letter to City Administrators, December 4, 2007, page 3. . 4 , y .. err,., ``® 4., ,i ,, F ',,' , .7 o: a' .. t , Ai, f 4. tsatc.ec s..s ce F,t'cee....stx. - r!-• .` _ "� s , t. S. ��'.s` 't ,'r .rei�sl.i�i#�4ii ltlis 1I1 i1svo tiistii� ia4'fti4Fo't,?;11� 7 , HI 4u ** #� Q 1 if(y -,,,, ,k K4y,'ri , ��' -" ` 4ggt ~. e i s _.. y,�i X },ma.` i t ' 3 i 7'' s (`: ° '. {j 0' ;-);L, '' "' r: { () ( Y) f t4 7 3"F{ L 4{ w fie tI s "tS 4 ,e, , ,, ,I, .A , Y ‘-1,,,Tc,;,:ycto., ,7 1 $41 MO‘,#4'4:1- r +.4 View of fence from sidewalk on Kennedy Drive from southwest corner of fence looking towards entrance to the Winding Brook residential community. NOS PLANTS were planted in front of the fence that will block it from view. Approximately 715 sq. feet of fence (i.e., 13 panels) are totally exposed. Picture taken on December 3, 2007. a"" 01 s &)11,-- d • Letter to City Administrators, December 4, 2007, page 4. t i 1#f i ,, fi lz. ' - , \jilt IP +vs•" ? - `�' •* ,•,P4..:4'i ib v 7-•is i►w•gr4Ovwii►4... ! .. tt:ty tsasi. s �♦��++�1++!!!!!.!!.'��j�.�. i�i�i��i +�;7okt �+yg`i,��o� ail MEW .7 +!!!�•..'! 1 V� f.0er. �t�ut�'t� 1 YSiS �•�.1. . •:(4,&.••••••%•••10 4.4• . -4,,,,,k,:p.., .. Ate.404041.01t.kites Ilk y �\, `4r4 `r tip',{4,,,......x. .^ %,% I X.y, •' 44 .444),N,Irt44.',.,'„r ,,,, , , .. %"„)41 „NYC `-:- . - T Vo40.1 , ' -, R rti.4.,401%.4 <Xti 4J View of fence taken from sidewalk on Winding Brook Drive from northeast corner of fence looking towards Winding Brook homes. NO PLANTS were planted in front of the fence that will block it from view. Plants popping through the snow are non-mowed weeds. Approximately 385 square feet (i.e., 7 panels) of fence are totally exposed. Picture taken on December 3, 2007. an,r►,d;n,3, atoofc NcuneoAAZnovut. asoci,alion. Date: July 10, 2008 To: City Council of South Burlington From: Winding Brook (WB) Homeowners' Association Board Re: The City's Industrial, Chain-Link Fence at the Main Entrance to our Residential Community The large, industrial fence which the City constructed on land that it seized by eminent domain from WB homeowners during the widening of Kennedy Drive mars and defaces the main entrance to our residential community. The City's landscaping plan has failed to block the view of the fence as promised in a letter to Lorraine Berkett, a resident of WB, dated July 12, 2007. We are fully aware that Lorraine Berkett started a petition at the WB Homeowners' Association's Annual Meeting on January 17, 2008, which we support and signed. The petition states: Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. ti The industrial fence is in total conflict with the high standards of the City to enhance and maintain the visual quality and integrity of South Burlington residential areas. We request that the industrial fence be replaced immediately with one appropriate for a residential entrance. Any further delay in replacing this industrial fence only extends the defacing of our residential community by the City and adds injury to our property values. Thank you for your time with this matter. Sincerely, Winding Brook Board of Directors: Michel St.Germain ohn '71 /ka. Eli a � Canning UElizabeth Walters a-bt-)r a 1 u7'►t ai. ✓ Susan Deacon Barbara Romanoff Date: July 21, 2008 To: Chuck Hafter, Chris Smith, Sandra Dooley, Stephen Magowan, Mark Boucher, Meaghan Emery Re: The City's Industrial, Chain-Link Fence at the Main Residential Entrance to the Winding Brook community From: Lorraine P. Berkett, Ph.D., 8 Winding Brook Drive Enclosed please find a copy of a letter from the Board of the Winding Brook (WB) Homeowners' Association to the City Council of South Burlington requesting the immediate replacement of the City's industrial fence at the main entrance of the Winding Brook residential community. Also, please find a copy of the petition signed by residents of Winding Brook to replace the fence. One hundred percent (100%) of the residents that were approached to sign the petition were in favor of it. The original, signed letter and petition will be submitted to the Council tonight at the City Council meeting. Charles Hafter, Manager City of South Burlington July 18, 2008 Page 2 most interested in this interchange have notice of the scheduled hearing. I have confirmed with the attorney who represents the Allen Road Land Company that she will attend the hearing. The hearing and site visit will provide the Council an opportunity to review the project site and note specifically the property' s access to Hinesburg Road and the proximity of the proposed on-ramp to an existing residence. Representatives of the Allen Road Land Company have, in preliminary discussions, suggested that the proposed taking will render the balance of the property unusable. I have also received new preliminary design proposals for the interchange. The Council' s review of this information should assist it in deciding how it wants to proceed with this acquisition. Sincere , .4tt Steven F. Sti el SFS/af Enclosure son08-085.cor STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O.BOX 1507 BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05402-1507 (802)660-2555(VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F.STITZEL FAX(802)660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R.PAGE* WWW.FIRMSPF.COM JOHN H.KLESCH ROBERT E.FLETCHER E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) DINA L.ATWOOD JOSEPH S.McLEAN WRITER'S E-MAIL(SSTITZEL@FIRMSPF.COM) AMANDA S.E.LAFFERTY WRITER'S FAX(802)660-2552 WILLIAM E.FLENDER ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) • July 18, 2008 Charles Hafter, Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re : Allen Road Land Company Property/Exit 12B Dear Chuck: At its meeting on May 19, 2008, the City Council acted to commence condemnation proceedings to acquire property identified on the Official Map for the City of South Burlington that is proposed for development of an interchange for Interstate 89 and Hinesburg Road. This interchange is presently designated as Exit 12B. The Council voted to hold a public hearing and site visit on July 21, 2008 . At its May 19th meeting, the Council was shown a plan of the Allen Road Land Company property with the area to be acquired by the City delineated by a red line. Following the Council meeting, in discussions with representatives of the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization ("CCMPO" ) , I learned that the CCMPO had contracted for preparation of new preliminary designs of the Exit 12 interchange. In hopes of receiving these additional plans, I delayed issuing the thirty-day notice for the July 21' hearing. Unfortunately, I did not receive the revised plans by June 20th and the required date for issuing the public notice passed without the notice being issued. I apologize for this oversight on my part . Despite the lack of the required notice, I recommend that the Council proceed with the scheduled hearing and site visit . Shortly after the Council meeting on May 19th, Amanda Lafferty and Joe McLean in this office informed representatives of the Allen Road Land Company and others participating in the pending Environmental Court appeal involving the subject property of the scheduled hearing. This was later reported to the Environmental Court during a status conference. Consequently, those persons � f • ^f3 •ti .,, v • Itt ' H AP t. • C • ;s i1 • .40 7 Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# 14" - 0 5 AITIARAk5 c-1ug-r t E '�.Sm 16 1( 1 (J fit- ��✓a� �� 1 Icfc. Cc ..vcv( _- 30 �7h Tr‘ loc‘ 6 u„r c ra.. 6-1,6(5 o- -t_' ' t - 3 01-11-GS' 4.1A,u-et\i4-1( E if Kt -//d ArEf 6 9 - o el 40 tle_ d egy-L,a"1-, (4-&-e-LAA atekvs 67 t- 17- S beC ?cc .3 11 I?, 66 cott bs . og 140,k \ 1 ,� -/2 y I 0.V t4),64-r " vnu ter ( `ji C.2 9'1?r S eo4 4, /C`F r ,[e ff /ye- a. Z5 e4 e2 _ i ( S /2-ciAs IN Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# (// 7-7ar kLc f I illog _ ---P,,,,evw 4 . 1--Li(s .5-2_ i/i 1 G lrIR '1 lia 2`r 7 a 6 Pet,Cr ,Z. prl el 0 13 I/1-7/oi �I i h e.L S1-�i Rm>iN 3 5' /// 7 6 g .- a- eoritaflog aA-90-MM* _...2____ _i : ) Of _. .... '—. I 7/ ; � it , ,-,�; 1"q r e f c,A9 8 7&6.,e. 10/Qldcp /'�( 0 z/ i'"reit 44 xi c-( /7/1 r` , -" / 7— ('/216 3- -bcborici Sli z /v Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# G143/0k Pi lien Thmos/ek -P - 04eadt 7 6 (23(0 if c1 i L L f viiii Pkicc aia,6 AA/v.- t -,i-aY' �i --, ` , // ce --es-oe --a‘71-4 4 /AV cns-itie- )-(7%...)L.02.. Te I'm biAtca.,:rev-__ 6,...) L7 /7 q/ b -023 -0 B4da ilcAL 1, 43 4 I EL!2/9,5E-T metbri - i,,..t..,,, ___,,i 0 L. — a 3- 0g cve i /iet ,/9 y I 6- 2,, , D gi --it-�, • �-t y Jb iNi nl. CAw�..E ci its C - 3 -0 ir) 3.ceicika__Z(46 --TeseAKc,._:- 0 -A C5 ,t6- 2-3 -0 .4,-,,,--t- ga, _*,...,/), 0_,....„ - r---- -72_, t = z� - d $ I'LL^-,6,-- 1 Z—4" r7 ( 6 -1 -6i pc,,41,-.0,, R,,gs-e.,A0, , ..4-s 6 - i) - 07 -).: e- 6-,J.,c- ,/ 4,1„__ _ ______, 4t-o-- - 2- . 0 E V i ,i Ak(Ok'kl l5-- Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Sig ure Unit# (t, 1-r5 Ck.4iL \_wk,014R d3 6 (c. .- koirseth 1, t- a a,/,, d 6 1 2-3 iecs Cc t s vt -L3 - - k.-c--0 ,/..L --itc7 3 Li s E fh4Ri'E k/DER g 1 2 3 -[cnt 1-Lc Buries -)12r_ 33 6/.,2_2 71:OnnA.5 ...). ckg „...\\- %,r,_____ I ct 4./ it_ i • At!Ci ea-c->..t 10(9/t--32 rec--,Z �•z a &Az .--- - ----- Et2i.K (--( 62oc cr o (02--- &611 -I 1 1 d , ,, , \'\) e.{izA 12-(c-qatd, .4, 0 latpto-c6ifigp f ifour c-d--- 6 azi/ '' 1ir4i m , 1/9d (5 2 a/-rlGt /zo o6,-7/ Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# 1 a ii,c 6neKS y� to )44 di orzdo, rKs odo ? 0/04 .a41-/--/- S\rqdreiticCk,04- 44ict (P/Vi o90 M vrGtv ai4 w �.v4,�, - a 3 1 L . of gy h vkr o 1 7;17 _De.3171 <,mci ,%/1/L-27 ,4). ff5 ' s >aylfri 6/44116-71 CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. OO I `Lf,YaaaE 1La1 164 Main Street COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 (802) 878-0375 DATE-_a)-C S JOB n FAX (802) 878-9618 ATTENTION TO C} uc\( 1 )e\ RE: tSC Y I'not J hoz, • WE ARE SENDING YOU iached El Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints Li1-Plans ❑ Samples El Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION \ -OS t t- 1 Ccrl-hOU Cy ihn THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval El Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TONYCL ©,Dea-, y� SIGNED:( ` ��` 1 ' { �C�.b,V If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. } STITZEL, PAGE&FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O.BOX 1507 BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05402-1507 (802)660-2555(VOICE/TDD) STBVEN F.STITZEL FAX(802)660-2552 a 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R.PAW" W W W.FIRMSPF.COM JOHN H.RLBSCH ROBERT B.FLETCHER B-MAII(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.0 OM) DINA L.ATWOOD JOSEPH S.MoLEAN WRITER'S E-MAIL(SSTT EL@FIRMSPF.COM) AMANDA S.E.LAFFERTY WRITER'S FAX(802)660-2552 WILLIAM A FI.ENDER (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) • July 18, 2008 Charles Hafter, Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Allen Road Land Company Property/Exit 12B Dear Chuck: At its meeting on May 19, 2008, the City Council acted to commence condemnation proceedings to acquire property identified on the Official Map for the City of South Burlington that is proposed for development of an interchange for Interstate 89 and Hinesburg Road. This interchange is presently designated as Exit • 12B. The Council voted to hold a public hearing and site visit on July 21, 2008 . At its May 19" meeting, the Council was shown a plan of the Allen Road Land Company property with the area to be acquired by the City delineated by a red line. Following the Council meeting, in discussions with representatives of the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization ("CCMPO") , I learned that the CCMPO had contracted for preparation of new preliminary designs of the Exit 12 interchange. In hopes of receiving these additional plans, I delayed issuing the thirty-day notice for the July 21°t hearing. Unfortunately, I did not receive the revised plans by June 20th and the required date for issuing the public notice passed without the notice being issued. I apologize for this oversight on my part. Despite the lack of the required notice, I recommend that the Council proceed with the scheduled hearing and site visit. Shortly after the Council meeting on May 19th, Amanda Lafferty and Joe McLean in this office informed representatives of the Allen Road Land Company and others participating in the pending Environmental Court appeal involving the subject property of the • scheduled hearing. This was later reported to the Environmental Court during a status conference. Consequently, those persons Charles Hafter, Manager City of South Burlington July 18, 2008 Page 2 most interested in this interchange have notice of the scheduled hearing. I have confirmed with ,the attorney who represents the Allen Road Land Company that she will attend the hearing. The hearing and site visit will provide the Council an opportunity to review the project site and note specifically the property' s access to Hinesburg Road and the proximity of the proposed on-ramp to an existing 'residence. Representatives of the Allen Road Land Company have, in preliminary discussions, suggested that the proposed taking will render the balance of the property unusable. I have: also received new preliminary design proposals for the interchange. The Council' s review of this information should assist it in deciding how it wants to proceed _ with this acquisition. Sincerely, , S / / ?arc ` r. r��.___. Steven F. Sti� el SFS/af Enclosure son08.085.cor • 1 s i cx.\•s o _._.carte © v- �} c -,cx • • & zaz '" l - Z W 3 W p Q o s to W `.+ F ate , ,.41 p :e - fit L. ' `' a rn �., @ c 3t. N Y \ 772,0444171 ti §t;T. i .7, ,".;..,4., ' a 1#. 2yQlQ iv ,,x / y deX 9fa g ' _ 4 % wrt- _T( y j, ? : CD i c" "r -_ . f o L''''' ''''''''''''4, .- - -, 1 UT (. Z W 4 , ��_ ,-'.4 35` n ` � ` 0 ,ui nnlu — .t 1. 3 ., X C W. ,. 1' O W *= Q ---‘p _ 1 ►�\3 n T ,..' r . w� _ i ' 'fir` X . ,�,\ 4 ' 44...,.„;.::,:„„":,,,.;4, _,,,,,.7 r.,. 4 , - --_-. di." ,tea- 0 /PO t'i' as )::::::-; >. f R x a T. j o U 7 m z 111 u a 1� W asm � a • . . `" fir... a ¢ d W ;- �vx f d • y *..' , /'I.'', // Ir.'', 5OCd,h c: in to .a , s _ '11: ---'..'14.-: ''''''''..1) '..' ''-'4''');/ ' - _.. -,isifiA'' ' >. 11 ti ' { j1/ 1 tfl t � ;„a .• ri•x -' _- ,:- _ , •-:- ,-r,:i.: 14/ :-';'4 , . - s 44 sa r § ° rig ✓p - -�` '^ '. -- - _ �� .i, r•, ir - _ M a- `,.ate ZU2E `.9 m - n b. W Pi _ .S, �'✓ ILI d n �t4 f x. : t� , r i 'AX3aintiiu �� .` u:fgtn J/ Itµ 2. .. r �; ! x - \y I i • . i E m r } r m - O ¢ W t flit ai Q Q W A NW U pp� ~- " ry F.� W D ce y . STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BA1TERY STREET P.O.BOX 1507 BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05402-1507 (802)660-2555(VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F.STITZEL FAX(802)660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R.PAGE W W W.FIRMSPF.COM JOHN IL KLESCH ROBERT E.FLETCHER E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) DINA L.ATWOOD JOSEPH S.McLEAN WRITER'S E-MAIL(SSTITZEL@FIRMSPF.COM) AMANDA S.E.LAFFERTY WRITER'S FAX(802)660-9119 WILLIAM E.FLENDER July 18, 2008 Chuck Rafter, City Manager City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Annual City Meeting Chuck, Section 503 (a) of the South Burlington City Charter provides : The annual city meetings of the city and the South Burlington school district for the election of officers, the voting on the budgets, and any other business included in the warnings for said meetings, shall be held on the third Tuesday in May, unless otherwise legally warned by the council . This section expressly authorizes the City Council, without amending the City Charter or otherwise obtaining voter approval, to change the date of the annual city meeting. Such change, if made, will also change the date of the school district meeting. The City Council is not required by the City Charter to hold a public hearing to exercise this authority. Nonetheless, we recommend that the Council hold at least one public hearing that is warned in the same manner as public hearings on ordinance adoptions are warned. I have attached a draft public hearing notice for such a hearing. Following the public hearing, the Council can take action on the proposal . You have asked what impact the change would have on incumbent City and School District officers who were elected at annual meetings conducted in May. The terms of these officers are generally described as one, two and three years . However, the precise duration of these terms is not based on a 365 day year. In the case of a one year term, the duration is the period Chuck Hafter, City Manager July 18, 2008 Page 2 of time from initial election to election and qualification of a successor at the next annual meeting. This may be more or less than 365 days . It is our opinion that this same general rule applies even if the month in which the annual meeting is held is changed. We are aware of instances where annual meetings were changed from March to May or June. Where such occurred, the actual terms of incumbents were lengthened. The change proposed in this case, will reduce the actual duration of an incumbent' s term of office. Nonetheless, it will end with the election and qualification of a successor at an annual meeting, as was intended at the time of initial election. Sincerely, Steven F. S tzel SFS/ son08-084.cor CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CHANGE IN THE DATE OF THE ANNUAL CITY MEETING The Council of the City of South Burlington hereby gives notice that it will hold a public hearing on 2008 beginning at 7 : 00 PM at the South Burlington City Hall at 575 Dorset Street to consider changing the date of the Annual City Meeting from the third Tuesday in May to the first Tuesday in March. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont this day of , 2008 . CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Charles E. Hafter, City Manager Received and posted this day of , 2008 . Donna Kinville, City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to me this day of , 2008 Notary Public son08-011.for /a Presentation to City Council - July 21, 2008 Police Department visioning process The Police Department is moving forward with a process of visioning and strategic planning. It has been several years since the department has taken on a process of self reflection and internal review. We have now concluded a second day long process of working to develop a vision statement, drivers and operating principles. When the process is complete we will have an outline that will guide officers in their daily activity, focus, attitude and commitment. Below is a sample of this process, which has involved a public comment period. This was posted to all South Burlington Front Porch Forum neighborhoods. POLICE SEEK CITIZEN INPUT By Trevor Whipple, Chief of Police-South Burlington Police Dept., Dorset St, twhipple©sbpdvt.org Thu, 10 July 2008 Greetings South Burlington Citizens, Below is a message from Captain Todd Shepard. Captain Shepard is the second in command of the police department and has been instrumental in helping us move forward with some visioning and strategic planning for the department. The time has come for some citizen input and we value your opinion. If you can find the time, Captain Shepard would appreciate hearing from you at the address listed below. I thank you in advance for any assistance and for the regular support the South Burlington Police enjoy from our community. In appreciation, Trevor Whipple Chief of Police Dear subscribers to South Burlington Front Porch Forums, Your police department is in the middle of a process designed to closely scrutinize how it operates so that we can better plan for the future. Our ultimate goal is to create a strategic plan that will help guide us in developing short and long-term goals. Last month, all supervisors and managers for the police gathered together for a day as sort of a retreat. The work that we did created a new mission statement that we are planning to present to the City Council later this month and adopt at the end of this month, but first,we would like you to take a look at what we created and provide us with any feedback. Please feel free to respond directly to my work email address tshepardcsbpdvt.org or you can share your thoughts with other members of your respective forums and I will see your comments there. I would like to thank you in advance for any input that you wish to provide and wish you all a great summer, Captain Todd Shepard r w It's the mission of the South Burlington PD to... Foster a safe environment which promotes a high quality of life within our community. By... Reducing the level and fear of crime Facilitating safe highways Addressing community concerns by actively seeking input and responding to issues brought to our attention. Managing our organization responsibly utilizing effective, efficient, and rational planning. Recruiting, retaining, and nurturing the development of the most qualified personnel to meet the needs of the community and the police department Values The core values of our agency are integrity, loyalty, dedication to duty,professionalism, teamwork,fairness, and respect July 18, 2008 EXECUTIVE SESSION Memorandum To: Chair and City Council From: Chuck Hafter, City Manager P Re: Executive session items: Litigation and Real Property Acquisition Please be prepared to discuss: 1. Settlement in the Butler v. Quattlander and City of South Burlington: Attached is information related to the mediated settlement in the above captioned case. This agreement was reached last Thursday, after seven hours of tough negotiations between the City, PACIF (our insurance carrier), and the Concord General Mutual Ins.Co. (Ms. Quattlander's insurance carrier), three attorneys and Ms. Butler. The attached mediation brief from our attorney describes the issues of the case. The settlement was favorable to the defendant's. The plaintiff's demand was for $450,000-the settlement for$50,000 of which PACIF will pay $27,500 and the Concord $22,500. Since PACIF had reserved $50,000 to settle the case, they were pleased with the outcome. The City's cost of the settlement is our deductible of$500. Please approve the agreement; a motion for open session is attached. We can add the item to the end of the regular agenda for later in the evening. This information is confidential and I will collect the information provided at the end of the executive session. We will take immediate action to inform all property owners who have used city property as their backyard that they need to quit the use and remove any personal property. As they say, no good deed goes unpunished. 2. Discussion of Marceau property negotiations with Chris and Chuck. 3. Discussion of Leduc property negotiations with Mark and Chuck. LAW OFFICES McNEIL, ',EDDY & SHEAHAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION JOSEPH C.McNEIL(1919-1978) 271 SOUTH UNION STUEET JOSEPH E McNEIL BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05401 JOHN T LEDDY NANCY GOSS SHEAHAN TELEPHONE WILLIAM E ELLIS (802)863-4531 SUSAN GILFILLAN JOSEPH A. FARNHAM TELECOPIER KEVIN I.COYLE* (802)863-1743 KIMBERLEE J.STURTEVANT BRIAN P MONAGHAN (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N Y) PURSUANT TO VRE 408 June 20, 2008 Joan Loring Wing, Esq. 24 %Z Center Street Rutland, VT 05601 Re: Butler v. Quattlander and City of South Burlington Chittenden Superior Court No. S0797-07 CnC Dear Joan: Thanks for agreeing to mediate this matter for us on July 17, 2008. My firm represents Defendant City of South Burlington("City"). Accompanying are copies of the Complaint, and a page from the City's Answer, listing bars-to-suit and affirmative defenses. In this case, Plaintiff was socializing one evening with Defendant Quattlander and others, in Ms. Quattlander's back yard. At some point after nightfall, a loud noise alerted at least one of the persons present to the fact that a tree in the vicinity was falling. I believe the evidence at trial will show that at least one person yelled "TREE!,"perhaps pointing to the tree at issue. I believe the evidence will also show that all of the persons present ran in a direction opposite that of the problem tree. Everyone escaped serious injury, except Plaintiff,who was struck by a part or parts of the tree, sustaining fractures of her skull and right wrist. At this point, the City views Plaintiff as fortunately having recovered quite well. While she has some residual effects from her injuries, the City submits that those effects do not substantially impair her abilities or enjoyment of life. Plaintiff has sued both Ms. Quattlander and the City, ostensibly because there may be a question as to which Defendant(if any) was ultimately responsible for the tree's condition. I believe the evidence will show the tree's condition was poor(dead), and as a result, it was an arguable hazard by virtue of its leaning at a significant angle into the area where the accident occurred. The question of which Defendant(if any) is ultimately responsible for the tree's condition is arguably made more difficult by the fact that the tree, while functionally part of Ms. Quattlander's back yard, was (for purposes of argument) actually rooted in/on City land. The ' Joan Loring Wing, Esq. June 20, 2008 Page 2 "cultivated area"referred to in the Complaint was land which over the years was the subject of some back-and-forth between homeowners (including Ms. Quattlander's family) and the City as to what could or could not be done on/with the land because the land was, survey-wise, really part of one of the City's parks. Attached is a rough drawing(by yours truly) with information (at least for mediation's sake)which may help. Written discovery has been exchanged, and Ms. Butler and Ms. Quattlander have been deposed. Darla Champine has also been deposed. She is a long-time City employee who spoke with Ms. Quattlander in a telephone conversation on July 21, 2004, the day after the accident. Accompanying is a copy of the memo that Ms. Champine did with regard to that conversation. As you will note, the memo states in part: Jackie was calling to inform us that a tree that she said was dead and that she knew it was dead and had not taken care of it had fallen in her back yard and that a friend had been injured by the tree and was in ICU at the hospital. The City's position is that it bears no responsibility for what happened. The City views the evidence as a clear situation where the tree at issue had been part of Ms. Quattlander's back yard (i.e.; in the mowed, gardened, cared for, etc., area) for decades, and had been a noticeable hazard to Ms. Quattlander for decades as leaning significantly over her back yard. As the memo by Ms. Champine shows, Ms. Quattlander, a day after the accident, acknowledged that she knew the tree was dead and"had not taken care of it." The City anticipates that Ms. Quattlander's position will be that the tree's roots being in City soil make the City solely responsible. Such a view is untenable. The City's arborist would testify that the City owns some 5,000 trees and that the City, like other governmental entities charged with the care and maintenance of trees, undertakes reasonable steps aimed at insuring that those areas of the City where trees' proximity to persons and property could be an issue (especially around significant weather events), are periodically inspected as resources allow. In this case, Ms. Quattlander was in the best position to know of the tree's condition and to do something about it. Accordingly, any liability here should be hers. Notwithstanding the City's view that it bears no responsibility here, the City looks forward to the parties attempting a pre-trial resolution of the case. Because I'll likely be preparing for a jury trial that commences on July 21, 2008, there is a chance that one of my colleagues will attend the mediation in my place, sufficiently informed. I'll let everyone know if that is to happen. I expect that we'll be joined by Kelly Kindestin of the Vermont League of Cities and Towns Property and Casualty Intermunicipal fund, and Charles Hafter, City Manager (possibly by telephone, "on call"). As you know, because the City is a public entity, any Joan Loring Wing, Esq. June 20, 2008 Page 3 tentative resolution will likely have to be approved by the South Burlington City Council before being"final." Please call with any questions or concerns. Otherwise, we look forward to working with you. Sincere1y 1; 4 ,.- Joseph A. Faham JAF/bjh c: K. Kindestin(w/o enc.) C. Hafter(w/o enc.) R. Kaplan, Esq. (w/enc.) R. Mello, Esq. (w/enc.) 400000-00334 GENERAL RELEASE TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN: GREETING: Know Ye, That I, JANE BUTLER, of South Burlington, Vermont (sometimes hereinafter referred to as "the Releasor"), for and in consideration of the sum of FIFTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($50,000.00), lawful money of the United States of America to me in hand paid by VERMONT LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INTERMUNICIPAL FUND, INC. (hereinafter referred to as"VLCT-PACIF") and CONCORD GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as "CONCORD GENERAL")the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have remised, released and forever discharged, and by these presents do for myself and my heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, remise, release and forever discharge the JACQUELINE QUATTLANDER, and her heirs and assigns, and CONCORD GENERAL as her insurer, and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (sometimes hereinafter referred to as "the City"), and its current and former agents, officers, employees, successors, and assigns, and VLCT-PACIF as their insurer, of and from any and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, sums of money, accounts, reckoning, bonds,bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages,judgments, extents, executions, claims and demands whatsoever, known or unknown, in law or in equity, which against the said JACQUELINE QUATTLANDER, and her heirs and assigns, and CONCORD GENERAL as her insurer, and CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and its current and former agents, officers, employees, successors, and assigns, and VLCT-PACIF as their insurer, I ever had, now have, or which my heirs, executors, administrators or assigns,hereafter can, shall or may have for, upon or by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, at any time up to the date of execution of this document, and particularly,but without in any manner limiting the foregoing, on account of all issues and claims for relief which were asserted or could have been asserted in a matter entitled Jane Butler v. Jacqueline Quattlander and City of South Burlington, Docket No. 5797-07CnC, or otherwise. I recognize, acknowledge and understand that the parties hereby released admit no liability of any sort by reason of said discharge, that the parties hereby released in fact deny liability, and that this settlement is reached for the sole purpose of avoiding protracted and expensive litigation. Except as otherwise permitted below, the Releasor agrees that this settlement, including its terms and amount, shall be kept completely confidential, and that this confidentiality pledge is a material term of this settlement. The Releasor agrees that she shall not hereafter disclose or otherwise publish or publicize, any information concerning this settlement, or any of its particular terms, any reference to the parties, or any of the facts or circumstances giving rise to the dispute which is resolved hereby, to any person or entity. No party hereto shall make any reference to the amount of the settlement. The exceptions shall be: a. The Releasor shall be authorized to discuss any aspect of this settlement with his attorney or financial advisor. b. The Releasor agrees that this covenant of confidentiality is subject to the obligations of the City under Vermont law, including the provisions of Title 1, Vermont Statutes Annotated, §§ 316-320, pertaining to public documents. Should the Releasor or anyone acting on her behalf breach this confidentiality commitment, the Releasor shall be obligated to repay VLCT-PACIF and CONCORD GENERAL the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) of the settlement sum. A breach of such confidentiality obligation by others shall be regarded as a breach by the Releasor. In the event that it is necessary to bring an action to enforce the terms of this covenant of confidentiality, VLCT-PACIF and CONCORD GENERAL shall be entitled to interest and costs, including a reasonable attorney's fee. The Releasor agrees that this Settlement is subject to the approval of the City Council of the City of South Burlington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ) } day of July, 2008. IN PRESENCE OF: oP Witness JANE STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, S . At Burlington, this I'f day of July, 2008, personally appeared Jnae Butler, and she is known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same for the purposes therein contained and that it is executed as her free act and deed. In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. (Lit � nL Notary u is ( Comm' Sion Expires: 2/10/11 2 r SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION 575 Dorset Street 1,1 South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4I06 www.sburl.com SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Tuesday, July 22, 2008 7:30 PM City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street AGENDA: I. Other Business & Announcements 2. Review Minutes of June 24 and July 8 3. Review Proposed Stormwater Regulations with Tom DiPietro 4. Discuss future of Design Review Committee Respectfully submitted, 064erje. Cathya L. LaRose Associate Planner/ Interim Planning Director sou -_ urio . PLANNING & ZONING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Tuesday,July 15, 2008 Deliberative Session 7:00pm Regular Meeting 7:30pm City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street 1. Other business & announcements 2. Minutes of June 17, 2008 and July 1, 2008. 3. Site plan application#SP-08-58 of Norman &Jean Parrow to convert 750 sq. ft. of basement area to accessory residential unit, 26 Tanglewood Drive. 4. Conditional use application#CU-08-05 of PG Adams, Inc. for conditional use approval to construct a 12 foot high fence, 1215 Airport Parkway. 5. Site plan application#SP-08-59 of Paul Adams to amend a previously approved plan for a 19,850 sq. ft. light manufacturing facility. The amendment consists of installing a 12 foot high fence, 1215 Airport Parkway. 6. Miscellaneous application#MS-08-05 of Sports & Fitness Edge to alter the existing grade by resurfacing four (4) outdoor tennis courts with more than 20 cubic yards of crushed stone and clay, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. 7. Final plat application#SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates, LLC and G&A Associates, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of 149 residential units. The amendment consists of: 1) adding 30 acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 30 multi- family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset Street. 8. Site plan application#SP-08-54 of South Village Communities, LLC to construct a 192 sq. ft. gazebo in Dewey Park (lot#6), 1840 Spear Street. 9. Site plan application#SP-08-55 of Liftech Equipment Companies to amend a previously approved plan for a 9900 sq. ft. building used for equipment service, sales and rental use. The amendment consists of site modifications, 33 Commerce Avenue. Development Review Board Agenda July 15, 2008 10. Site plan application#SP-08-57 of Timberlane Dental Group to amend a previously approved plan for a 3216 sq. ft. addition to an 8304 sq. ft. medical office building. The amendment consists of revising the approved landscaping plan, 60 Timber Lane. 11. Continued site plan application#SP-08-50 of Patricia Calkins to amend a previously approved plan for a 14,220 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of constructing a 2100 sq. ft. addition for retail use, 2500 Williston Road. 12. Continued appeal#AO-08-11 of Cedar Bluff Condominium Association, Inc., appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation#NV-08-14 for zoning violations at 303 & 305 Lime Kiln Road. 13. Continued sketch plan application#SD-08-26 of South Burlington Realty Co. for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing existing 1000 sq. ft. building and 2) constructing a two (2) story 15,880 sq. ft. mixed use building, 2040 Williston Road. 14.Design review application#DR-08-05 of South Burlington Realty Co. for design review of the following modifications: 1) change use of portion of building from photocopy &printing shop with accessory retail to personal instruction, 2) add two (2) HVAC units, and 3) add two (2) parking spaces, 50 San Remo Drive. 15. Site plan review application#SP-08-61 of South Burlington Realty Co. to amend a previously approved plan for a 5250 sq. ft. photocopy &printing shop with accessory retail. The amendment consists of: 1) converting 2900 sq. ft. to personal instruction facility use, 2) adding two (2) HVAC units, and 3) adding two (2) parking spaces, 50 San Remo Drive. Respectf Submit , Ra iuond J. Be air Administrative Officer - 2 - • w 7 . "co ou„eueuMoroNYf4*O4w City of South Burlington (`i( I r !t"10II 575 DORSET STREET f' �, ����.��`I'����,,�,� SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 846-4107 •`b FAX (802) 846-4101 M t,Byf,�rowx M'1111111Ws CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER July 18, 2008 Chair and City Council South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Discussion of fencing used on Kennedy Drive project to secure stormwater ponds; Lorraine Berkett, Winding Brook resident To All Members: You have received several communications from Ms. Lorraine Berkett a resident of Winding Brook Condominiums. Ms. Berkett is unhappy with the use of chain link fencing on the Kennedy Drive project which she believes takes away from the aesthetics and value of her property and other homes in Winding Brook. As background, the Kennedy Drive project was the first in the State to comply with new stormwater regulations. As such, fencing was needed to provide security at the site of several stormwater ponds. Kennedy Drive was a 90/10 project, in that the State provided 90% of the funding and the City 10%. State specifications, and participating costs, are limited to the use of chain link fencing for this type of use. We did specify green fencing to try to minimize the impact of the fencing—but we overlooked that the poles were not specified as green, so the contractor installed silver poles. The state would not share in the cost of any other type of fencing. Staff agrees that the impact of the fence can be mitigated, especially as the landscaping installed at the Winding Brook site has not grown as well as that at other sites. We have investigated the alternatives, and some information is attached to this memo. To summarize, the alternatives for Winding Brook are: • Chain Link: $1722-$2756; Installed $3400-$5500 • Wood Picket: $2411-$4134; Installed $4800-$8000 • Steel/wrought iron: $7234-$10335; Installed $14000-20000 • PVC: $5856-8268; installed $11500-16500 • Aluminum: $7234-8957; installed $14000-$18000 • 5-6 ft Arborvitae: $1550 installed • 6-8 ft Arborvitae: $2650 installed Although there are seven stormwater ponds with fencing in the project area, we believe that only two have an impact on residential properties. It is staff's opinion that the use of 6-8 ft Arborvitae hedge will present the most efficient alternative to minimize the impact of the fence and we are prepared to move forward with this option. Alternatively, if a condominium association wants a more expensive option, the City could offer them the opportunity to pay the difference between their chosen option and the cost of the Arborvitae hedge and install the option chosen. Sincerely, Charles Hafter City Manager In Page 1 of 1 To: dodgerchris@comcast.net ...snip... meemery@comcast.net, chafter@sburl.com From: Berkett <berkett@sover.net> Subject: Issues raised at the June 16, 2008, Council Meeting regarding the City's industrial fence at the main entrance of Winding Brook (WB) residential community Date: June 26, 2008 To: South Burlington City Council Members From: Lorraine P. Berkett, Winding Brook resident Re: Issues raised at the June 16, 2008, Council Meeting regarding the City's industrial fence at the main entrance of Winding Brook (WB) residential community I regret that I was not aware that the City Council was going to discuss the City's industrial fence that it constructed at the main entrance to the Winding Brook residential community at the June 16, 2008, Council meeting. I plan to be at the next Council meeting on July 21, 2008, and submit to you the petition, signed by the WB Board and residents, to remove the fence and replace it with one appropriate to this main residential entrance. The City in its letter dated July 12, 2007, committed to change the "type of fence" if the project's "extensive" landscaping did not "both block the fence and return the area to the conditions before the project started." The City has stated that the "projects landscaping is done" (letter dated November 27, 2007). The landscaping was not "extensive" and the project failed to block the industrial fence as has been documented by numerous pictures taken throughout this past year and submitted to the City. It is time for the City to fulfill its commitment to change the type of fence. In previous correspondence with you, I have included pictures of security fences that have been constructed in high visual impact areas on private and City land (i.e., the Marcotte School security fence along Williston Rd. and the security fence at the Heatherfield stormwater pond) as examples of an appropriate type of security fence for the entrance to the WB residential community. Again, the City's industrial, chain-link fence is not appropriate for the main entrance to the WB residential community. I look forward to the City Council meeting on July 21. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 /Virus Database: 270.4.1/1518 - Release Date: 6/25/2008 9:46 AM Printed for Charles Hafter<chafter@sburl.com> 7/14/2008 Bruce Hoar, 12:52 PM 7/1/2008,FW: more fence Page 1 of 2 Subject: FW: more fence Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:52:00 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TN E F-Correlator: Thread-Topic: more fence Thread-Index: AcjRfeD9tc3r5DUVRu6aODo7ZThWQgKEIx9gAAL1 u7A= From: "Bruce Hoar" <bhoar@sburl.com> To: "Chuck Halter" <chafter@sburl.com> Cc: "Tom Dipietro" <tdipietro@sburl.com> X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 8.0.101 [270.4.1/1521] Chuck, Below are numbers for fences. This Patriot Fence actually looks pretty good and I feel would serve our purpose. I will forward you the number for it as soon as I have it. Installation/Labor is just about as high as the fence cost or more. We have passed the times of material being the more expensive part of a project. Although fuel cost may start to swing the cost back the other way. Bruce K. Hoar Director South Burlington Public Works 575 Dorset Street South Burlington,VT 05403 802-658-7961 bhoar@sburl.com From: Tom Dipietro Sent:Tuesday,July 01, 2008 11:34 AM To: Bruce Hoar Subject: FW: more fence Bruce, I'm not sure if I sent this to you before, but attached is a brochure for the fence we are considering at OCV. It could also be used for Winding Brook. No cost information yet. The existing fence at Winding Brook is 344.5 linear feet in total length. That includes a 16'gate. Here are some rough numbers that Jack gave me for other fence costs: Chain link$5-8/LF x 344.5'=$1722-2756 Wood picket$7-12/LF x 344.5'=$2411 -4134 Steel/wrought iron $21-30/LF x 344.5=$7234-10335 PVC$17-24/LF x 344.5'=$5856-8268 Aluminum fence$21-26/LF x 344.5'=$7234-8957 Obviously,these costs do not include installation. -Tom Printed for Charles Hafter<chafter@sburl.com> 7/7/2008 Arborvitae Hedge North and South Sides of Stormwater Pond Adjacent to SugarTree Condos (Approx. 200 linear feet) 5-6 ft Arborvitae planted on 2 ft centers Installed cost$15.50/tree Total Cost $1550 Or 6-8 ft Arborvitae planted on 2 ft centers Installed cost$26.50/tree Total Cost$2650 Be advised that space is limited. On the north side of the pond there is only 3 feet between the fence and a paved sidewalk and on the south side of the pond there is about 6 feet between the fence and the sidewalk/bike path. Annual shearing of these hedges will be required to maintain clearance on both paths. • .w „ 32 31 00/OME 4„ . , V, 4 ,� BuyLine 4133 .# 4..4.E S. aP'i� l. ii',pa@�',o�F�. T liiiir 0:;"11111.1.1L1 0 r; 1 1- .,.. it 1 1101 kr ., • 11-4-4,41,& ' P 1 1!II!J !r ' ! fi a ski 1 `:r lot* rm.% -' ''n - ' ' ' - '').--- ' •"."-' .' . i.,,,f ;., ,i.ef: , ,..4, z,„ vil;41., . ,..tili•4 di 1/11 jasif 1.•i L,,.. , 1 >ow / 4 I tin asap J r€ t 41 d� e R # {' 1#( 7E �i �pir t # g #(]]at y 4 j� .� # fi r, ...�1£. t I``t, iti i ..„ , ...,;,.. "-ostor Lissoi ' '4"'j '11% c: 0'%I..' - ''' ''. '''''', ' '''' 4,, if " 't,';' ,,,,, „, isit ,,,, 3, _ i 1 i ,,,, .,,:40: y ,/,/ N,0000# ,74,. '4::,., .....,,,e,,,,A4,,,•--,,..„ } j -1 ,` ...try § � _4111V-_ E gym' fir ` . Ey k E . . 4 wi EVOLUTION t ELITE da s Oiwas,eM�a// Fencing Solutions ......_ For industrial,institutional,commercial,residential and entertainment facilities alike,designing fence enclosures that combine privacy and protection with an attractive appearance can be a challenge. Omega II Fence Systems show you solutions that meet the need for style and security. Omega II has emerged between the chain link and the heavy ornamental demands and now offer contemporary and modern lines touted as 'Today's Ornamental'. The new Double Wire Fence Systems open the doors for projects requiring even higher security and reduce the many possibilities of vandalism associated with legacy chain link fence designs. By creating a unique,less-bulky design,facilities can find many advantages with'Today's Ornamental' fencing from Omega II. With new options available,customers can select from various designs ranging from cost effective systems to elegant security solutions. Now,when it comes to permanent and temporary enclosures,facilities no longer need to be sitting on the fence when choosing between style and security,grief, , ,•,,,, wt,,,,t,, , , ,p. { Ii Affi s Yt . •-- sss yxx'•' ' si ? us ,fie} '•.- '. *ti: ..,..s; ';g m'sxy�s.-..w. ffik.. ...<wtia-1 m� .3 hskn$ q;�, <.r\ 1 4 "� € • 1, ' , s 2 .::. I p . :: � • .5,: a, -,. • - �'a� �' a Y= . - �� ''` � � say £ �� eta n ; wa "� s p,/ d y £ DO,Vtee •v.' e L f {Er' r°'�,`{r.N! 6.�✓1�t`�7'�':. .- _ frettM Gig i�LE'.?k,`� .. ., tool:ersN to ,'.1Lr4'.4, ; fl.,TEaRJ • Distinctive unique design • Urban modern look •Strong-Resistant panels • Double wir es resist vandalism h - r •Virtually uncl!mbable • Difficult to cut and climb •Unobtrusive view •See-througi panels . •Appealing reinforcing bends •Aesthetic,clean lines • Lightens appearances •Sleek panels w thout bulkiness www omegafence.com t-800-836-6342 41 a e,t a olo a w a,w a the Needfir style a/dzecir q t 1 1 It . 4;tk. , _,,,,:, : ,,,, itti: 1.1.. :::!..,:6,--Y+„..'''' 'I\'':I:—1'1'm7''S\t''. 9} ti,...7:, itim — ,. : 1 ' ' 't---"* Ill; ' 14171Q+111111114 ' -... }'xr ELITE : a. 1 a :, ', a ,P ,r < VERSATILE MODULAR . COMPONENTS 4 ‘ t� , • ` o� 1' «anyx-lit— < 44111r* t'. - ,� to . far /Mg strife tIrr, Cast i ari'dg F a� Comb/ming Sty/es... a siiperior OMEGA ARCHITECTURAL RAL „P ry t tN'�' " 'C" ";,f'z 'r e ."idm "' EVOLUTION 'ez www.omegafence.com 1-800-836-6342 . . . Gates .:' . ,„...- ,.:,;:zi,l• --, „,. :I=, , : ;" ••.• I ,: .4%.24 1 .., . . .. A ' .... ,-, . ,,4144 ,,,,,, T.•kii.! I *a. 1 T'....k. . • ....• - "'""*.,..- :;,-• !" • . ..',,,,,ZMA-, ,..„,.,,-... Double swing gates Cantilever slide gate Single swing gate Panels DOUBLE WIRE PANELTM OMEGA ARCHITECTURALT" Welded wire: SECUR ELITE and EVOLUTION Welded wire: Horizontal: 2 x 0 GA (8mm) 2 x 4 GA (6mm) 6 GA I 6 GA wire mesh with bends in vertical Vertical. I x 4 GA (6mm) I x 4 GA (6mm) wire for ridigity and aesthetics. Mesh opening: 2 in x 8 in (50mm x 200 mm) Mesh opening: 2 in x 6 in (50 mm x 152 mm) Standard height: 4ft,5ft,6ft,8ft Standard height. 4ft,6ft,8ft (1230mm , 1830mm ,2430mm) (I245mm , 1550mm , 1778mm ,2464mm) Length: 8'-3" (2.510mm) Length: 7'-9"(2356mm) 414: ,-,.-- All panels are reversible during installation:one end has I" (25mm)extended wire,while other end is flush cut. • • • ' - -,,s,0","-... - • ,-••„„ ,-,,„;15,Nov,1-,,--t.,,,, , T-•- •;',:,k,4,0,.;i:47,?..., ;1!;:z<.-",,,i-z„.„,...,... '.<.<=:,4,.;:-,,Ni, •:‘,74-• , - - -2-,;-•-,:17-41",-...,,sr,:,• ..:',,,,,,Lni:;;°*,,,-. - •`fli...:,<-::;:;,•:, -,,pp,,,,,,,, ,,,„,,,),,„,,,.„,,',.!,i.,,,,,,. Post models and hardware - ,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,:,,. , ,,--t,,,,,,,,,, . „ ,,:•,,,,,-„,--,. ..„- : ...„.< „„..,. -_,- --,,, .. ‘?,..,..,,,,,,;,-,,,,,-„,..:,,,,,,.,4,-,,,. ,,,,,, , -,e, • ,,A.,,•,., • , •; „- ?"-'':;.ti-,'.4'.., . • - ',„,,, ::- , .,;---, ',::::.-= ,,,....;:::':::- , ..,,,: ,...ni,. ,,t.; ‘.:.•• ..Kr ' '-...;:l'','";._;.l'z';',,;=--4-.," If z ' •-."'.'x•- 1 :s':.,v,..',,,L,',t., ,,,-.4,P-•:.,,,,,,t..,-4.•,..A.,,,,,,c,,,,,,,,A,,v:A.,-,.. ,;:.,,N7,4„.70,41: - 1 ';;;;;,,,,',-,t. ,..,....:•,,•,,,,,,..tiorio?,,,,,y,.,.;Alt ,1 K 109,'' ,'":fi,64,,...It",1,::•::Z4,':17:41,1,;1 1.,,., '1.!,,,,,„...,,,,,,,,'s• 2 ft ,, 011 ill! .,•,YONfr,':.-4,......:.1'4:::,'.':".'l'',11.t.'1°'k",:''Aft4,,,,,,,, .,7,,.„i i -.,,i;:., ..-:.,,,,f,,p;:;7t,E7,-„,- '''',- ikiii-",',' -;,:i.::::2J- .vo.:,Ipp -,,. ol.:,,..ii ,,,„,,,,,,,,-4,„,,,,,,,,,„ , ••. -,. ,-..„,,,..0,,..„,.„:., ,....,,,, „_ .4„,,,,,,,,,, : .17;',I.v, '''',''-•'"•• ••••V.V.V*;•:' ••'' -• .11 •-,`,,4,4_,;‘.„,„:,*2.,,:i •.., ' " r•g,,..4.; ':' "''' ' 'Z'4•,'`'''' • I .,J.,7„..,..,g,.„*; i:itoci, ;',,,,4,...,,,,: ',,,,i,,,,.:Its r",,' ,4 l'!".i•-4:4,:•,,•s,2,y,• ,.,,,V, .: - V....IA.:4 , • ''.'4' 'r'' '•%1A'i*:"°'i'f'72*v"f:':::"'': '''Aili'`.,:Z` ' . ''S.7. ,":`::,' ,..,;''' ';,'";',,“ •,-:.'," 1, ' • ,'!. , ,, DOUBLE WIRE FENCE "•W.,' :" ..,i:',V.;• ''';.. ,-,..„;-'1"'"''''''- .7 •:'--','",7:77,'7.,,,P.--...4.-: 77,47;,.,:,,-',..,., -,f;;;;.•..,„-'.., .;,51.,,,,i 6,;,..,,,, -1. 1.,.=,,,... ::,• ,;.,.,,'44:4, ;,.:',.: ;.?il Lt.-,,-..1.. -,.,.;,,r,,L„L,A .,,. , L,.., , .,, ,. .,..„ „, ,t-N.„.,4vri .1 ,.z-4 , :-=:,,, .'i- -,,,,,,.251.,..L-,4AL1*--,,-... .-,.. t.,„.r.,,,zz,..1,-t-z.--, -,roxi-- '', ,-,','..t.:`,1) :e.,..4,41:4,:!,iw,1 FAPT-77.7.7.-7.'W;7112 7'-1 .'';,..-1'!;gillf,:3; ;1 11 1' i"''''.. I!illIsh I ''..r-:51 '' i' '""'''' ' 1 ir"-- :*.:'.1 "- :,7 ----71'' .-TIX'"'",_,: ,:„:",. ' .Sr..:;;',..- ',: 'ii,4.-;• , o. .1. A ii .,-',411 - -=' ••••• ','''''''',,,I4:°:.--Y.'it.i.•.,;..4;:?:;',.zYaiL.,..,-3-.•-L,.. .-'1' .‘'..•.:—:::.=.:-:'-.:,; ','',,T4...,'-.'-:-.1;17. 1.,•-•-::R'''''.7.- i''z- 111 • '*;.' :-.,,, - ';''''''.4,..,,,,, ,;,?.;•L 7...wr-,,,, --711.14r.., ,,,•::',777:,77,7-'FF".rf,,,' 1 ,;fr.. ;i,4-vo,-::.''' :'':,2?.'rz"..' .7," ..c, ,„-,,,..,:...,, ,t,z--... ..,....,...,=.....„.:,........g.,::,,.., ,...:.„tt ..,, , ,,,,,,..3,,....tt,:71,,....; .. 7•:..:. .i...- ,., , '''':. -;.. ''':- ' '. '''''':- ..4 ''''':::"i7;. .7., .,.,tX,1',liat, ,;.%:A.,... ,,,--..-;,,.T'X'1.'-17 ..•- k•; 1 • , aat..;,..,,,..‘'..'' 1.,.....a...' ; ,,,,,..,;ov;.2,,,4:.-. .,,,„,rfv,..•- ,..,,,e,;, „ift , .,:,,,,Wp:.,'.....„\ii.v..r,,,,,z...°. •.,. =.,,,, , ,.t--.•.4-a-r1-I,%''.1;1.:=•-; '. ,k •1,,,..,,,, ,'''',.',' ',!..8•',.,k.;,..^if,a4.,i.&,`.<,'" '` '';',.S-`4;•',•4,;',•.'•'•''',.(jas;"',,t,"'rf•C.- . ..... • 1.149 •••,',,?VP '• m ,x.,--,'„,,.,i :':..i.„„,=.z. ,." ,,;-,e44. r..4.4.,.. ' • .;, -„,..,..:,..":74,., , , , j,,3,, ,,„ , ., - .• ._ 41111riiril. •.-. ' , i. „,<t;..;,-2.-.„-45,,,,,, •,,,<<A.<-r,.-A••,:w...A 1 :,-„i,,t• ..,:: -••.,-,,,,,,, •"1.,- •xf-,-i.,-,!." •-,,- . 11pil "' ',•:',, z•,<;,'":c ,2';'..,,l''..::*:,••317.•„,;:p,z,,,,i.l.:1.:::•.;.:;-,1^••„' It .!'St:y?, 1P.1P 1,!; . ' :'4\'; '''''•''';''''•- ',. ,f'5::::.,-4„ - ' '1 —-g'':*40-!' *-,.-' '!''-.1''"4:"..?..i''''',':-..;4'i;t:Itt'-'4'''''..-;;AN*T47-47:7171<' ,-"'ir.":Iffrinti::%*14,14:g.:,;4 .r''',4''''''' '14,%'44:taii047 :••• :4ii ; 'z:'' • :,-..,,,,,,z,„ TrAT,7;,,;,,,,mott..,,,,,.•1,.N., `74.,..V,k.r.'•°4 ftw,;,P,Ff,.•..';'.:',4"•''',.' ',4";/:---:•::.'1.e.,'t. .,,,,,,,,,=4;,,,,,,,„41,,1---..t,,,,..r.i,A43„:,,tlr:,.::.,1, , ,.; ...., ,,,,40.,;,,,,A„mar.:42- ,'=.K, .„ ; „,;,: ‘..',:''-.?;!.,.,*:%--.7.., =,3,,,ived,V44,1%.4,-..,,,,,, 4,,., -,----,... ,,,• , , ; ..t. .raateit..., . .0',....,44‘,...10.,. , ,,,0,„Ccii•,'''.2„:,• , •,,,,,,,,,,,,,-41;„ -,:•,;•;"7.1,-',,*f.,...Nit:1,,,, x ':.,-.;,.•,...„,1,,,, •,„,,•,-,p,,,,,,,;,,;1;,,,,,,,,4" i•t;?lii,',1* i''.•''-N I..0TrZY=V7-,7- . -. V'.• 4....."4>Wiii",',WO,stbiA';:••'-- .-w .','Att.,:"•:' .3.A3:',',WV:,'•;,,,ies..„ '400.;•••• -.,-nt••,,, .,,,„,,,,,,,,,44.i.evtio A',,,ti ‘',.:.,,A 41", „,,,o ..N.,„, tift„y-,.vAir, ,.:Ack.,:',K•Sfe-c');',,!j,41*,-4,,c;;'y 'q:•:::',O.Air V'''',- ',,,,,,: ,-- ';',:: ''''',----f_!.,7tie,Vy ' ,;ail 4:,..' , 4tilf.'1•!,',014.(.q31, 4:11.4tt-'',-„,-'-",.":4-. ' --A4 .L'''vf-P.,:.'MM,4A.1,_att7a2, 1;N:%--Al ifk,_„=%.e.. 4.4-::::1.4,,,,,,--;1-93;;A:1,?-)TiOlt Il`r:7",,,:,,,,,),..m.,:474:',?;:::':',Aryt:, : :::71:::4:: :,`",:'f: ,••••z,.:i4F;i'',,', , 6 /7:- 0 ,syro';',4,-1'Vt.J'i,:''';'1','4.Y1 Z,StW.i,IM'el7- '::'::::,-,e-:';'''''-4;ii';411:!•,,i*:,: 4C,,:, -''''.,1;;i:::-.: 4,itt 7,:i :°::'',' ', s:'...f."ttle;".1,.!'' "Ite.'?fP1-, • :- -2 ..." ' ,1,,,• _, ,s.f: foiwi,,'„;,,,,,,,:,',':,-,, ,;-,--:iv,' ,..',,%,,,,,,,,,,.,„.,..-610,-,4k,,,,,,t,,,,,,,,,, ,, , ,,--..,: ;:ra- -.t.' . , ',,,,,i,?' ‘• , , ,, , , — , ,,, z., ..,,, ' . To tia.,, y...._18 atemasteittal. it A division of Metaltech-Omega Inc. DISTRIBUTED BY: 1735 St-Elzear blvd West 1206 Sterling Road.Suite 6a-b Laval,Quebec,H7L 3N6 Dania,Florida,33004 4040AFA0 11111411C" as---4 T:450-686-9600 F 450-681-5318 www.omegafence.com information@omegatwo com 1-800-836-6342 20050825 t bt. aviel ifs41 ''. At A 9 -,0•11willn.--5 ...,L. ..,.., - ___-,,, ,,......„,.... "•:!4,•:.. , - „. 113 .. ..,„•,-.t.. N ` -S • .,• ,'.",`••- 4, , �•A w....rt.., - . "fir*« cr 9F .. !.. ,--„N ,`'t". . r 4 • r• }CIF t „f•.• ' s` p... 111 •4., • ' * 7.., IS . lift -7 -44:4•AM ..•t..54," .‘ ..,.°4., " ' Clir.W.,t, .„ . :r:.. ' • o � k� °` e �ti•• �`_ fir."" a Z "fir' • .��*��`{','�`'Z 4' 4 ro'• .!.i • 0 •.4 ..a " ti 0 ° a e F t=• ,.,,ms s e. Y f e \' "*; rt . 74 4 .. It!, ¢ . sue • `,}. 33 ' . , ,;�p�a' ._ 4 rr =.arcs+:- E a.:1: .. ...c «, at#%:.'''. '':,',,,,.,',:,,,,L,L,,,,,,131:::::,,Iii:6,,,,,,:„,t.,, .„,..,,..,..,cil....,:,,ti,„ ,„ .• ,,,,,,,„.—:,,,,,,„:,,,„:„: , %,,,,,,:. '"\ -ma c'... fir." y ee 1 ar , , C 4,4,.......... ‘ , ` m' �, • ti „....„ „. 4, r, s a .q it , f L e �1� y Fe..or .. .. w ° \� .k r- Awl.: ram, JP 1 ' rat"r ; ""yg �^'° i4i' ' .. Y ~'�.« +R. `.;1f fd tliu*V 4 r f • ..lli. .**4,07, , .1..... „Irt,.1:• ',.m.4„..„4•••,., :.VA. .41° ll :,--- '44 fl 4, ,,a..4 l•• ,l:. 4 ., ,,, la ,,.,ai,*:- „. ,,,,/*. • '4 E� y _`} r • i ca w til> L$' >p - _ - «l'� b • -.w +4 is,4 , ;' l r , ~ .r 11� E E 3 iPe E E .; ,. • Ed ( '!n # EE€, f t 5 E : � € c,,, '. N`t,,. ` F;..p;., d:E{JEE:E I E t E ,:' > ; . F reriaa's r1! eniin hQ/c+e • : .4s. .. �x The New Fence on the Block ',f - Er` g s erith has united the warmth and old-world charm of wrought iron fence `, .R 1 7: � . -I �` • ','> �; '1 with the inexpensive functionality of chain link in its latest product, the l %',`' ' -*� 4 , "7," !,, ., �'' Patriot Ornamental Wire Fence System! By combining attractive welded- t" w wire mesh patterns with top and bottom rails, we have created a fence that is �� S° .P;/ E "'4< '' unlike any other. This fence is so innovative that it was honored at the 2004 «.. 4b,' 'i "• I t American Business Awards as the Best New Product". 2004 winner , ° = Patriot Fence has many features that set it apart from every other fence.The heavy wires in '!e ��;�, ' .; the mesh (2,4,and 6 gauge steel)are welded at each intersection,which makes it remarkably ,�..,R i.t'- ', m' " `s 5 strong"The addition of the horizontal rails increases the strength and rigidity of the fence even �, '% further.A section of this fence can hold over 500 pounds without any permanent deformation. _`.` `` ' ' SKI „;Xa. The entire Patriot Fence system is galvanized and powder-coated for outstanding outdoor 's durability.This allows Jerith to offer an 8-year warranty on the fence, including its finish. , , '^ 'IP� � A variety of different patterns are available based on the vertical wires used in the mesh.These ,p wires are spaced 31/2"apart in our 2 and 4 gauge styles to create a more open appearance so ; that the fence virtually disappears into the background.The 6 gauge designs have a 13/4"wire �., g spacing which is very difficult to climb and meets most building codes for swimming pool «6` fences. Matching gates for all styles are easily made at the job site using panels cut to size. 48"TALL 4 GAUGE dg e However,the best feature of the Patriot Fence is the patented mesh designs which give this �„ r `""' fence the"style"that chain link lacks at a price that other ornamental fences can't match. "� :'; ` Patriot Ornamental Wire Fence by Jerith is clearly THE elegant, attractive and affordable x fence alternative! �' t :13- ,,: ;-71,,f7no! �` ' ... -..,iipSfkluk-''.--''' ,o,„, *-,.1•, ',, 1—f.; .1r....7,.:;.. ,,-Irt4,0i. ,, - , : , . mow* ;,,,,,fr,-,-.A.,,,,.,,,,,,..,„ . - ,,..:,„ ,: ,,,. , , - ' ,,,,,,,,,.--, .-,, vi,;:.'5., .-- '-,,,' -,.,:v 40 ...' o,gi:.- .,... ---- .t,.,{ YF'o'A• I)•'S • tE^ " ° � Y�`. JSh YR? d€ j � fx€ r . 1 3. ` .,� - m .4;: r :1. y gg .rt sr ? Y r:34 Ctilii gtgyr �^,�;;i � .a3 j g,',{�s , ' .. ... ,i�` ° ? w3k,4.':,i n "b .y#4 ♦ `. °,� ,.. '�S't via=ic^;xs."". %s.'F' :� '�" E� - mormillill .. , , ,,,,,, po, . ,, . .1.,, ''''' -, ' -''''-_' :11...iiilt,,00l:i'' . g ''1' ' ' -. ''''' -fVj.it,'ril'f1:.':'- ..,...,.„.. „, _ .,, , ,,,g,t.f.:AP, 4.414.7'4,!*!?1,940, .,,,t.,;,:;.. ,..:,4Citil 414.trag. g % ..,,sm. iiii k*,. „..• . .i ,..,-, , „„,i N'-"'''' ,,> p `x:t r f''.. t :y. E1 �� $ E d7 A �,`�R ^3 as '� �e?iF * 'C i �s i ;�,lGfal t! � 4 ✓.3 .., .4., av ' y t ems Z "„' x' ! I P . 0.,c:: as F ,` `'S [ Via€ 21,:. s g .' . `+ " , ��r"'�€'"�,�, .r «'�, � � ""��" �{' ` sees., fir«. � � � ,w;'� ./itj .''',:3,',":4:..", :fix' .: ., '- ,- ' ;. ,, 0 .:,,,„ i1111 �`lio _''', , Jittif Ni. 48" TALL 8 GAUGE .. 48" TAII 2 GAUGE g .a `sw 48" TALL 2 GAUGE l: � T' � .. '' >. «. V" �"., ._ "�m,::.'. fir" .r:: ... as; ." . g- '"`. .�.- �._ ,._ . ... B • _, F�. Ef�. �`.-. �y ,': ...; .:r�•�,: ,. �� fi.. • � f c �4 �0 1 €E E `N�E„�>3+ s .ter i „1,*'—'. , r `1 r 4` t • ':,:-': ,,'.-,',,,,,‘,-;:•,,,.•.:',,T,.'./-.:k_T.ii,..:..:.,•..--,'.,..-.-:'";0:„-:-.!':.:-,-'4-.:.,-;-,1-,,-2-.._.",...'-,"..?:-I1..0;'-q`.',,-,o:-,rl'i e,-,2,:-,I';„ },y' .. sax.�.. .,y - r s L'a 1. u -• • t J'�.f+P,fU' ; "' 'Rh, ,4 e....". X'�A rE€ 1 1yfi•i*' 8 4 $ _ ax "7x ,€' r '> `nC'' € € : .ss NrtN kry f,m � 1 a '1a tP iiy " .«. � a€&ny n., n yang' s ... i wi} �a,>.v s :.3L €• { € ', a.. • • • , € i8f _ ..yam a • .i' N Y � t e#`+'i' i,r ':a•,:" t :' diiiig a III lirr s .,- 1•••°,•'i c -, 1 - Itolir 'To•Nr4p-Vommittitiov-•.:4;fAti,k4 ,it:„.4i.,,,:,•i,,gir.w4iy. ,°4:A.,.4.w•,,,Ir:,:i.. : •°, Nt ..,F 3. , k �€ y P' W �. _ -3( r .ky *a',: ap,r;,zi n�• ► ... t{�{ yi}i°., { _:r,i ,._ g 1 ,t c,1 :4 ,}, * €- 5 #: y`z<'" &, F', S3.,,,'' *,E.,,-- fib 4�.;.,.7 .fAr , a., • I,,..:1p R, al .., a .� : w,,''4'.,g@ 1 tz. .°5 °.j�.n ...YitE—,.•,1 ;:• 5: .. .. qq 44 v 1^IA1 K a .., a. � _ , � NEB': �'.... �L ' �` �' t :',"!;;*:,;.0 L.;, ,, :v , .., � ...a��� � qk.��'�� � £= F^ ��.,,.�'�ry'. lw. k' 7 ,a1� ?. '.� y �; i. r'. 48 TALL 4 GAUGE a '.' � ., c a ,.u . � � • .. ♦ • s'aF . yam. ' •%°k{ .m N^J.,r 14 M... "` RA"' A.',..•k :. .F.'... a .,t� • ..:': :. s�rJ �`-' a 'z� •4`.., C'#' $,, Om' i� '�'7 t 9w p .' s„„y E 1 ly, 48" TALL 6 GAUGE " '* w' ttli c tp E i -lilt t{t� tt1lllllllll10 llll�ll�llint • .. - . Specifications ,, ! !f!solo] _:: t !( !l!8lll llll iIt .II Available heights 48';60';72" Standard Colors Black only �i �T ` ,00114,NR, A"y i1r �. Components Made From Galvanized Steel P.. ' 111. ' Ili ' ' y�y jj b A U . '.71 l'5 ... yes Vertical Wires 2 gauge (.263") ,l 1 iil!li.: --:e..., --q _g . ...mossslrin lliMO .„,.,ado,,,,..,„„,„,........, ��ll�l� tl?€ #a€ llllllrlllllil�l � 4 gauge (.225") �,»,I, `, .:��" iilllikll111 �1li111� s 6 gauge (.192") • tti• .: Vertical Wire Spacing (on center 3�/z" 13/a"for 6 gauge) :� €;,!► *Ili 1 } :� 7, , ,r„,A, 9 ) ( 9 9 ) m� 01 AAq f . RI ! Horizontal Wires 6 gauge ll'IOI � ''ill' Horizontal Rails 1"sq.x 18 gauge (,049") � � N Posts 2"sq.x 16 gauge (.065") l yy i Post spacing 72" on center . 3 Weight Supported per Section 500+lbs. 72"TALL 6 GAUGE , i.rr � . ( ..::n t "Il" .�,., a,'� .' .. .. - Fht��. '1€£E�4 ..,.. ' .. . h. . .:........ . . .. ,:; 5... ,;< ... E; c;- - .a,:- �.. .: .�,.._.. a:,E InEE, �� 4t ,{.di„:.E, ,.,.,... . .. >.< .'f(EEEx E E 3 r "� Beautiful Functiona► & Affordable! ° ' 1, ,� ■ Enhances the Appearance of Any Yard �a E, II Durable Welded Construction =-- ■ Ornamental Look at a Value Price • Commercial / Industrial Uses • i Stronger than Chain Link While the beauty of Jerith's Patriot Fence makes it an obvious choice for residential purposes, it is ideal for commercial and industrial applications as well.Chain link is frequently used for these types of enclosures because it is cheap and (somewhat) effective,although it is relatively easy to climb.Of course,the biggest 0.0 downside to chain link is its appearance- it is just plain UGLY. Patriot Fence provides an excellent alternative because it enhances your surroundings with cost effective,attractive security. The heavy welded wires in Patriot are up to twice as thick as typical chain link wire and are very difficult to cut Even if a wire were cut in a Patriot panel,the welds at the other intersections would be unaffected and maintain of OrnDiastinctimentaon^"l Fences the structural integrity of the fence.This produces a stronger fence system than chain link. Jerith Manufacturing Company, Inc. If climbing is a concern,the 6 gauge styles are very difficult to scale because of the 14400 McNulty Road : narrow 13/4"spacing of the vertical wires.There is simply no place to get a foothold.And, , better yet,your property won't look like a maximum security prison after it is installed! Aii 1/ i i Philadelphia, PA 19154 i , ' 800 344-2242 ' 215 676-4068 Stronger, harder to climb, reasonably priced, and beautiful —that is why Patriot Fence QvA�yS�i` beats chain link and is the best choice for your fence. I'Pirip-r�r ` Fax 215 676-9756 www.jerith.com 2 Gauge 4 Gauge 6 Gauge email: sales@jerith.com Verticals Verticals Verticals Jerith®,America's Fencing Choice", Ornamental Fences of Distinction", IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII11II1IIII11 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll FencCoat and HS 35"are all trademarks 48" Tall IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll of Jerith Manufacturing Co.,Inc. Manufacturing Co.,Inc. Jerith Ma Je llllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ©2005 rn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII All Rights Reserved. s `-„,,,,,-;:-.-A.,.03?,.`41:4 Your local Jerith Dealer is: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 s 60" ran IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 1111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 72" Tall IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiuuiiiiuuiiiiiimiiuumuii • FENCE APPLICATION GUIDE C, c,OMP 14. r Call our friendly staff at 1-800-836-6342 , CIE IAEENNE CO r try o+Irlia// Material only, F.O.B. destination U.S.A. Design Features per li.ft. er s . ft Recommended A lications LOW Security Portable fence and barrier systems,featuring rigid and aesthetically 42"H-$15 Ideal for providing temporary perimeter control for occasional PR OTEC & appealing panels.Three easy assembling components:base plate,panel and attachments.When no longer needed,the 6,H-$17 cultural or sporting events,also suited for outdoor garden centers, SECURIGARDWORK SITE AND CROWDCONTROL FENCE £ panels can be conveniently stacked for storage. 8'H-$21 construction sites,etc. _................ ...� _.. _..._.......,: ._._..._.._:. _,..,.,,.,�;.. ....._._...:.:�c m::,.,,,..........._...._�.__. ._...._._.:.. ....._. _-, .._....._�.......___,...,. .._.._u.;.._... _.._.mom ....�:� _�.:..,,.....,.._......:...__...�_.. � ._._, ... MEDIUM Security _._. �__ The only cost effective and easy to install alternative to chain link or ornamental fences. 4'H-$21 •Panels welded from three 4GA(6mm)wires with 2x8 inch 6'H-$29 $4.99 Any fencing application requiring better looks,durability and Evolution openings. 8'H-$39 security at a reasonable price. �. •Fastens to existing or new chain link posts spaced up to 10 f c/c. @ 8'3"post spacing DOLIrsLc Fe WE •Hot-dip galvanized. projects over$30K,deduct 1005 Omega's practically invisible panel promotes perimeter control 4'H-$19 •Corporate/college campuses,housing projects,healthcare/ to sites wanting to show off their surroundings or lighten their 5'H-$23 research facilities:Makes for inviting properties with clean Nr""w2or appearance. 6'H-$29 $4 75 unobstructive security. •Panels welded from galvanized 6GA(4.9mm)wire with 2x6 •Pools,amusement parks,tennis courts,public parks and OMEGAinch openings and design enhancing reinforcing bends. 8 Other H H-$39 or r playgrounds:Lets you enjoy the sights and sounds with your •Profile post with integrated claws and the square post with safety in mind. mesh openings our unique Omega bracket. available on request •Overpasses and parking facilities:Lightens or brightens even •Polyester powder coating. projects over 530K,deduct 10% the heaviest looking structures. HIGH Security 4'H-$25 Behind the Elite's clean looks lies a high security fence. •Panels welded from three 4GA(6mm)wires with 2x8 inch 6'H-$34 ELITEopenings. 8'H-$48 $5.95 Same applications as Omega but for crowded or overly abused •Square post with our unique universal bracket Other H available sites:Stands up and stands out. DONNE MO HIKE' • t Pol eser powder coating. on request Y P g q projects over 530K,deduct 10% HIGHEST Security Secur,the strong silent type,is meant to resist the onslaught of II trespassers. 4,H-$32 p •Schools and public housing projects set in high-risk areas: t • •c• •Panels welded from two OGA(8mm)and one 4GA(6mm) 6'H-$45 Takes a licking but keeps on protecting. 1.1,m,faki if fir:¢ wire with 2x8 inch openings. 8'H-$57 $7.55 •Airports,parking facilities,commercial and industrial properties: •Square post with our unique universal bracket kit with tamper Other H available Keeps intruders out proof nut/bolt sets on request •Polyester powder coating. projects over$30K,deduct 10% Commercial gates •Single swing gates. -- $32.00 Download a 3-part spec,Autocad details and more! •Double swing gates. $33.00 P P " i«tstaalson costs:not included USA/May/2008 ��NBURl1NpTp^,pf A J,� `/'� City of South Burlington ' I/+ , r.��1I;) 575 DORSET STREET �� �I�1�� ���#� SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 �_ $__�����''/ TEL. (802) 846-4107 �� `b FAX (802) 846-4101 9. �• `'ahfDA TCITY MANAGER OWN Wil'' CHARLES E. HAFTER July 18, 2008 Chair and City Council South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Consideration of approval of Resolution Establishing Reserve Fund for Rooms, Meals and Alcoholic Beverage Tax Revenues To All Members: Attached is a proposed Resolution which would enable the City to establish a reserve fund for the use of the rooms, meals and alcohol tax funds as required by the Charter amendment approved by voters. The Resolution also establishes a policy for the method the City Council will use to allocate these funds. The Resolution has been drafted by Steve Stitzel, with my input and has been designed to give City Council maximum flexibility in the use of these funds, while maintaining transparency and public input. Please discuss the Resolution and approve or modify it. Sincerely, (ji,,ki Charles Hafter City Manager • RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RESERVE FUND FOR ROOMS, MEALS AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE TAX REVENUES WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1506 (a) of its charter, the City of South Burlington is authorized to impose a tax on those transactions in the City involving rooms, meals and alcoholic beverages; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1506 (b) of the City Charter, the City Council may, in its sole discretion, deposit some or all of the revenues received from the above-said tax in a reserve fund to fund the purchase of land or construction/reconstruction of City buildings and infrastructure; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that there is hereby established a reserve fund, to be known as the Land Purchase and Construction Reserve Fund, and that the City Council be authorized to expend monies in the fund to purchase land or to construct or reconstruct City buildings and infrastructure; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Cou it may expend monies in the fund for the above-stated purpose y including proposed expenditures in the annual City budget or, in the event the Council identifies an expenditure not included in the annual budget, by approving the expenditure only after soliciting public comment at a public meeting held with at least fifteen (15) days 'public notice; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all of the revenues received from the above-stated tax be deposited in such fund unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this 211 day of July, 2008. Chris Smith Steve Magowan Mark L. Boucher Sandra Dooley Meaghan Emery Received and Recorded this day of , 2008. Donna Kinville, City Clerk • `` +xidiR, auac, 5 onveavuw a l Gelation. Date: July 10, 2008 To: City Council of South Burlington From: Winding Brook(WB) Homeowners' Association Board Re: The City's Industrial, Chain-Link Fence at the Main Entrance to our Residential Community The large, industrial fence which the City constructed on land that it seized by eminent domain from WB homeowners during the widening of Kennedy Drive mars and defaces the main entrance to our residential community. The City's landscaping plan has failed to block the view of the fence as promised in a letter to Lorraine Berkett, a resident of WB, dated July 12, 2007. We are fully aware that Lorraine Berkett started a petition at the WB Homeowners' Association's Annual Meeting on January 17, 2008, which we support and signed. The petition states: Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. . The industrial fence is in total conflict with the high standards of the City to enhance and maintain the visual quality and integrity of South Burlington residential areas. We request that the industrial fence be replaced immediately with one appropriate for a residential entrance. Any further delay in replacing this industrial fence only extends the defacing of our residential community by the City and adds injury to our property values. Thank you for your time with this matter. Sincerely, Winding Brook Board of Directors: Michel St.Germain ohn Canning Xap Elizabeth Walters Susan Deacon Barbara Romanoff �' Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# ArnARAk5 GA>g-c i € eVroGuikoG Ib itikkfc 71/4 1rcbI t U AC j dl-� 7-GS //LK 4-/ T - o e_,1 go t-1/ ter- y� Azet C ages 67 1' I?,a6 C0.6 os t\fo. „.„‘1,_\ 02 9/v d' Sf�P/� ,' F r,fe ft 2n, Q. _.e/t/(Z_ -r files IN - (, Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# /17_70,,- RLc //-4--i-Q--,-(im IZtag,?,(, %(-Jy-it 71--- ' l1logrl Li , ICSZ 41 I// 7 O R 6 RR 4 vb rid Pr- /�7 O A��r p►^ii'! 43 111710i M i C 11 e L S./•6immiiiv 3 se-- //! 7 lOg '� a_ /�orx n• a a, ja4,4a,talq-nion* ---42 4 �� I �v�, c � ,-% -tom_ , -z%z-,.� ? i/i -7/,-)(S) il; c-Zr..j —a revii , CA 81-i ((-6-- kaadt, (*zi,-)14,14„,_, ( 6 a L/O 6 w s cif 4 44,9.cs gll ' . ,Y " 7Z /ZI6 2' -bcboec./ `S'li z ip 1 Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# G14'3/ok Pl./yen Thre. ems -P - Atiheit 5' 6 ( 13(o4( of CA- fly-Ai PR.JcC &Li% iLt ‘ ,�/,0 I/ 2V . /.✓f�‘74 71/4- -7, / / C. --2s DB TCn ti L ut-sZie- w Te lick. L —i- fL L 17 a3 `"0 Bda ) ljat, 4 - 3 -4 I Eiz g ETtf A4/ I � /-of .6.-c __,.i L, — al3- 0S �,///e.t /2 Li1i/v 6-- 2 3 D g' -)rl , au,J y -fb Nry m• C tvo Ltli v.S 6 - 3 -0 si 3Azoka_ii)46 -Te,f€53<c.-- ).- 0 k. 5 , - V3 -a i Yrc11- /daas l g, — .7v = z3- a8 -r 7 ( H: . • • • e ' • Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Sig ure Unit# (t 1-2:-5 c4,L_ \__61,6z,_ R )3 6 k.- I_ oir'etiN 1-4140,1- ci 1. 1,,,t,iii (N .aiiJc.,,,4 % 6 2-1i C€mac rk to s ( -,..-, _Ai,._,,I,... .,z, --1 ,7 6 3____ ,L I s E /}h4R,'E ki c //R g c G 12 3 "Pe_n‘‘ 1{c BcUrrS ---P �t2 33 6/.,2_2 71,-6A.."5 ). tc,--„J-(g .,..\ %,,_____ I ct G. I . Atc,eme..,:t --,(W..",,Z -za &___./i“ c----- ."--7--- --- Eigr.K°1 (7 eR vc `ry 0 b/011 C ' i Y\i,e,fizA (-(c-qatcL .4, 0 /ay. - , \ a2. SafiA , Q D e74 c51—. /.,2i 1/ a/-if vac( /zo (.0 67, 1d.ti ig 4A h y . l31?-s5( • o � . r - 6`i Petition to the City of South Burlington to Have Them Remove the City's Industrial-Style, Chain Link Fence at Winding Brook Entrance We, residents of the Winding Brook community, strongly request the City to remove the industrial-style, chain link fence it constructed at the main entrance to our residential community on land that it seized by eminent domain. The City's chain link fence mars and defaces the primary entrance to our residential community. We want it replaced with one that is appropriate to this residential area of 84 homes. Date Print Name Signature Unit# al log bias i C.G ,12 ?/ Lynda rKs 0/04- 5.1c- (pt),-110s, Miv-'ty 4 A-I kv • ' 0Y H 4fM r A 5 _Dc..50) e.,&) 19_ ff5 s Sup �'t4��vY�, - 5 6 -65 07J dilt4V1-71 �Oli