Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - City Council - 06/16/2008 co 03,4 , -BUR LINarot 1Yf7 A City of South Burlington '� 'i;ii k.i/j 575 DORSET STREET r.�it;���`f��� -`�ti SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 �_' _ ►��_�'� TEL. (802) 846-4107 0� `b FAX (802) 846-4101 9y a~ `'dhf�A TOWN M'RC�, CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2008 1) Comments and Questions from the public (not related to the Agenda). 2) Announcements and City Manager's Report. * 3) Adoption of resolution re: Police Lieutenant Peter Lavallee * 4) Dog Park Committee Report, Investigate Use of Landfill, Tom Hubbard, Director of Parks & Recreation * 5) Report and Update on the Police Facility, Police Chief Trevor Whipple; Rebecca Arnold, Arnold & Scangas 6) Briefing on Race Data Collection by Police; Police Chief Trevor Whipple * 7) Request to approve Memorandum of Commitment to participate with Consolidated Emergency Communication Planning Committee, Captain Todd Shepard * 8) Discussion on Date for Town Meeting, Weitizteartng * 9) Consideration of Proposal from South Village, LLC for a public/private partnership for construction of youth soccer field; letter of intent. * 10)Presentation of Chittenden Solid Waste District Budget 2009; Consideration of Approval; Tom Moreau, Executive Director. * 11)Discussion of process for allocation of Rooms and Meals proceeds * 12)Consideration of approval for ANR/DEC Application for Revolving Loan Funds re: Airport Parkway Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade; Authorize City Manager to execute. * 13)Council appointments to Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and UVM liaison positions. Page 1 AGENDA SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2008 14)Review agenda for Development Review Board meeting to be held on Tuesday, June 17, 2008. 15)Review and approve minutes from re-organizational & regular City Council meeting held on June 2, 2008. 16)Sign disbursement orders. 17)Adjourn Respectfully Submitted: U. lf Charles Hafter, City Manager Page 2 scut burli.n, t o PLANNING & ZONING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD AGENDA Tuesday,June 17, 2008 Deliberative Session 7:00pm Regular Meeting 7:30pm City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street 1. Other business/announcements. 2. Minutes of June 3, 2008. 3. Continued sketch plan#SD-08-26 of South Burlington Realty Co for a planned VSL unit development consisting of: 1) razing existing 1,000 sq. ft. building, and 2) ,,� constructing a two (2) story 15,880 sq. ft mixed use building, 2040 Williston a t �� Road. X-' 4. Miscellaneous application#MS-08-04 of Yiota Ahladas to expand a non- complying single family dwelling by enclosing an existing 12' x 14' deck, 3 Pavilion Avenue. 5. Conditional use application#CU-08-04 of Burlington Tennis Club, Inc. to amend a previously approved plan for a 2500 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facilities. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing an 1800 s . ft. addition to the indoor recreation facility, 2) expanding parking area, 3) constructing a wiffle a ie1d, and 4) constructing one (1) additional paddleball court, 121/2 C East Terrace. 6. Site plan application#SP-08-44 of Burlington Tennis Club to amend a previously approved plan for a 2500 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facilities. The amendment consists of: 1) constructing an 1800 sq. ft. addition to the indoor recreation facility, 2) expanding parking area, 3) constructing a wiffle ball field, and 4) constructing one (1) additional paddleball court, 122 C East Terrace. 7. Final plat application#SD-08-27 of Stephen Juiffre to subdivide a 1.34 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) parcels of 1.0 acres (lot#1) and 0.34 acres (lot#2), 68 Kirby Road. 8. Continued design review application#DR-08-03 of Patrick Malone requesting design review approval for the exterior modifications to a 33,733 sq. ft building consisting of office and retail food use, 222 Dorset Street. The subject property falls within Design District 1 of the City Center Design Review Overlay District Development Review Board Agenda June 17, 2008 9. Preliminary plat application#SD-08-28 and final plat application#SD-08-29 of Merchants Bank for a planned unit development to amend a previously approved plan for a 100,932 sq. ft. retail building (40,205 sq. ft. vacant) and a 1000 sq. ft. bank with a drive-through facility. The amendment consists of: 1) enlarging the bank's leased parcel to 1.02 acres, 2) razing the existing bank -(`I.•d building, and 3) constructing a new 2120 sq. ft. bank building with a drive- $,\`" through facility, 929 Shelburne Road. `r' c_\ w 10. Sketch plan application#SD-08-33 of Birchwood Properties, Inc. for a planned unit development to construct a 25,685 sq. ft. general office building, 65 & 103 Bowdoin Street. A., ,:,1_. 11. Continued conditional use application#CU-087-09 of L.E. Farrell, Inc., to change the use of a 94,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing building to warehousing,�� Nr,, processing, storage, and distribution use, 20 Karen Drive. _.sk_ ,e-9- 12. Continued site plan application#SP-07-83 of L.E. Farrell, Inc. to change the use of a 94,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing building to warehousing, processing, storage, and distribution use, 20 Karen Drive. 13.Appeal#AO-08-11 of Cedar Bluff Condominium Association Inc., appealing ,� c'. the issuance of Notice of Violation#NV-08-14 for zoning violations at 303&305 Lime Kiln Rd. — -e._ 1--0- (E.d-r.=-'‘ 1 �,..-At\-, 3 c---\- ) 4- 14.Appeal#AO-08-09 of Century Partners, LP appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation#NV-08-11 for zoning violations at 2&4 Market Street& 100 Dorset Street. ‘v cl d 15.Appeal#AO-08-10 of Tekram Partners,LP appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation#NV-08-13 for zoning violations at 2&4 Market Street & 100 Dorset Street. 1•;,o (-)� Resp fully Submitted, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer - 2 - 03 �ipu o sumuNcroA,rf A �'� '�t. City of South Burlington / + !�`h�� 575 DORSET STREET TAP ��!' , SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 05403 -- TEL. (802) 846-4107 t>' .,° FAX (802) 846-4101 CITY MANAGER t'sAfO4 TOWN M'a°�y CHARLES E. HAFTER June 13, 2008 Chair and City Council South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Council appointments to Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and UVM liaison positions To All Members: The City Council needs to appoint a Representative and an Alternate to the MPO for the two-year term beginning July 1, 2008. The Council needs to also appoint a Representative to the Technical Advisory Committee of the MPO for a two-year term. Albert"Sonny" Audette has represented the City on this Committee for many years and wishes to be reappointed. Finally, the Council should appoint a representative from the Council to serve as a liaison with the University of Vermont. Sincerely, Ches H er City Manager �' SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT v��' N /pig- 1� (D046) ,. � •'° 4 .. wit 4 <��EO4 rowM Mnx°'"� }�d4 4.r. frk To: Charles ana r ge From: Chief Trevor Whipple, South Burlington Police Dept. Date: 05-01-08 Subject: Planning in Progress for 2008 National Night Out The South Burlington Police Department is currently planning the August 05, 2008, National Night Out event. We really appreciate your support and cooperation over the last 15 years, making the NNO event a success. The Police department is requesting your participation in the event again this year. We would like to ask each Department head to assign a liaison from your department to help in planning the logistics and availability of each department. • City Management—assistance requested: 1. Support permitting process 2. Identify city involvement and authorize resources for event 3. Financial availability of monetary resources for event 4. Approve lead agency additional funding for coordinating event Please contact director Sgt. Tom Fraga or coordinator Catherine Welch at 846-4624 Respectfully, ae/07,--L___ Trevor S. Whipple Chief of Police 575 DORSET STREET, SUITE 2 • SOUTH BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05403-6295 Dispatch:846-4111 •Administration:846-4165•Fax:846-4102 Trevor S. Whipple, Chief ARNOLD & SCANGAS ARCHITECTS SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE FACILITY June 16,2008 Site&Building Construction Costs $5,407,912 Builder General Conditions(10%) $540,791 Builder Overhead&Profit(5%) $297,435 Builder Payment&Performance Bond(1%) $62,461 Escalation to 2009(6%) $378,516 Estimate Contingency(8%) $534,969 Total Estimate of Probable Construction Cost $7,222,085 Permits: Act 250 Application Fee $34,305 Construction Stormwater Permit(ANR) $500 Stormwater Discharge Permit $1,500 Water Supply Permit $350 Water Supply/Wastewater Disposal System Permit $1,000 Labor&Industry Construction Permit $39,721 Water Dept.Tap-in Fee Waived Impact Fee Waived City Building Permit Fee Waived Soil Borings $5,000 Materials Testing $12,000 Power Company Charge $15,000 Furnishings $231,000 Mobile Shelving $50,000 Door Access,Security&CCTV $195,000 Dispatch Radio/Communications/Consoles/Radio Tower $268,000 Telephone Equipment $103,000 Data/Audio Equipment $103,000 A/E Design&Construction Administration Fees $649,988 Clerk-of-the-Works(Part Time) $36,000 Builder's Risk Insurance(0.35%) $25,277 Project Contingency(10%) $722,208 Total Estimated Project Cost $8,931,449 ALTERNATE 1: $5,000 Install bullet-proof glass at Dispatch exterior windows in lieu of standard glazed windows ALTERNATE 2: -$7,200 Install 2x4 acoustical ceiling panels in lieu of 2x2 ceiling grid ALTERNATE 3: Need electrical load Upgrade emergency generator to operate full functions of building w/AC ARNOLD & SCANGAS Building Construction Cost Estimate ARCHITECTS 2008 SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE FACILITY DIVISION 2 DEMOLITION-SITE $2,424 DIVISION 2 SITEWORK $973,821 SITEWORK $519,398 SITE UTILITY PIPING $194,484 SITE IMPROVEMENTS $44,217 LANDSCAPING ALLOWANCE $51,330 PAVING& SURFACING $164,392 DIVISION 3 CONCRETE $213,360 DIVISION 4 MASONRY $196,896 DIVISION 5 METALS $118,506 STRUCTURAL STEEL $81,393 METAL FABICATIONS $37,113 DIVISION 6 WOODS AND PLASTICS $615,203 ROUGH CARPENTRY $439,828 FINISH CARPENTRY $86,267 ARCHITECTURAL MILLWORK $21,022 BUILTIN CASEWORK ALLOWANCE $68,086 DIVISION 7 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION $370,728 DAMPROOFING $8,996 INSULATION $142,750 SIDING $33,706 ROOFING $184,108 SEALANTS & CAULKING $1,168 DIVISION 8 DOORS AND WINDOWS $249,859 DOORS & FRAMES $48,720 HOLDING CELL DOORS $24,753 SPECIAL DOORS $9,420 WINDOW SYSTEMS $90,941 SECURITY WINDOWS $13,577 TUBULAR SKYLIGHTS $12,347 DOOR HARDWARE $46,601 GLASS & GLAZING $3,500 DIVISION 9 FINISHES $431,493 GYPSUM BOARD SYSTEMS $155,916 CERAMICS &TILE WORK $47,410 ACOUSTICAL TREATMENTS $53,177 FINISH FLOORING $85,632 PAINT & WALLCOVERINGS $89,358 DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES $103,902 VISUAL DISPLAY BOARDS $8,237 TOILET PARTITIONS $19,744 ACCESS FLOORING $22,700 FLAGPOLES $6,494 SIGNAGE $7,179 METAL LOCKERS $25,353 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS & CABINETS $1,500 TOILET ACCESSORIES $12,695 DIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT $27,415 PROJECTION SCREENS $2,927 RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES $5,644 HOLDING CELL BENCHES $18,844 DIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS $9,842 BLINDS $5,076 RECESSED ENTRY MATS $4,766 DIVISION 14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS $61,600 DIVISION 15 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $121,068 DIVISION 15 HVAC & PLUMBING SYSTEMS $1,066,615 DIVISION 16 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $796,545 BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE $1,700 PRINTS & SPECS $2,000 TEMPORARY UTILITIES $44,935 TOTAL DIRECT WORK $5,407,912 ehen / / ' / / / / ----" ' /' "°• ---- / 1 1leimi / // // / // // / / / / ,-_-- - / , - /' / / 1 I - I / / / / // / // / `\�\ II St 1 1 / l / / / // // // /' \�\ 1 I J j l / i ARNOLD & SCANGAS // / I / / // // / /// �' i //p00 ' '/ /'' \�����\ I I / / / ARCHITECTS / // / i 1 j / �;6 °/// // //� / x is • '• \` -NN N \ I / / / ca Ethan 91100 e i a'ews / I I I / / y /'/ • ` \\ I / / / / �a,z� • a 3 9:,: e. / i i / / �o ! / I 1 1 1 I / I / 'vt.v� /'Nwa // •\\\ N. ,I / "� i i i i ;N;.S"rvcsrq,,, .'" 68 Total .--, .i, I • i / S •i / / 1 I 1 1 1Paces \. / / / / / 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 / 0___ _____ / I I / / \\` d I I \ II / lf / , x r \ rrJ \ I /\\ // /// / /' /'/ / / / / / / 0 - / -\\\ ` \ '2 /\ \ - -� \ �\\ \ \\ I CIVIL KREBS&UNSING 1 h/-.. / // / // / `/ // / / , .J o� \i.. `�tv // \\ 11 i- 3 � of \\\ \ CONSULTING ENGINEERS �` 0375 //��. // / // / // QJ N'� ,—' /' / 'qs ��o� J/q• p •\ / / I / + \`�� \\\\ \\ I 1 le.wale Streett.Suits 201 Y I \j / / / / r o�/ / �Oa°Z b,` -7A 7., / X 1I \ \ I eaan..e«,v..,.�e,�t osue j \ / \+'�� ' / /' /' /' -- --: —--0-=mwcv \ _I nuµ ill \ \\\ 1 I LANDSCAPE ARCHTTECI•. ,/ 1 �.` / \5!' / / / / / -- - / --- - \ \ .-,, •mac \- - , o / / / / / _ \ I r. •O'er / / I v 1 1 / _' /'\ \ I\/ / I I �'�/\ 4'o. / // // // // /'/ ,-- \\ .-�.r � / / i ,:.::\I I 1 \1 /� '/ /' '/'1 / �I \4b,..... ' ' / \ 1 I Pi U I I / / , / _ / / / /"___, J 1 / // , ,\,// '> "b_-- ��/ // '//i \ / /I / ,I ���� \\ / 1 \\'�xr �� / I / '/ STRUCTURAL 71 Cr /, // // // I// -,// r. // /, -\\ I / // ,/ N,r. - "_��• I • I l-/ i '/// / I111� 1 Legend b / /' / /, ,// //--' \i /,,/ I / / /' I-__- R I1 I I`_ _ e/ -/ '////// ._ I-�I o Cw,msre monument found I ' / I / , / \ / �,/ , --_ _ \ /a'IAi /' / i- 1 / / / , ,'I / / / / I • Iron phe found _ III-1 1 do 1 1 / / \ \ / \ I / ° ,, O ' / / I ' ,/,-- /'-/ - Drowse point ELECTRICAL/IECHANICAL I I I \\ �1, m WWI NS,/,''' aDtas�sem6ly- / .' ,933 \\' / .I / ,•�� x JJ - l I-.�'/I\ '/u I I /ill j j I I n, Utility pole / / g,p°' "' \ ' //,max / 'e.� '' ®%���. 1 v,� - / / I1,''�'¢}gam 1 I I I / i , 1 o ay pde // // h pNj `'� 1\ 1\ \i �/' // ,31' 'n•4 '`,i% •,,..��� _ ////'/ \ '"// I\ 111 I I II j 11 /' 11 a receptacle p / / I I I I \--_ --- -_-"- ,�� / / '�;� _ I I \ ' 1 I I I I I Pow tole weer \/ / '/ ,/ \- 1 \,/-----------------:- / /�.3o / / 6 1 I 1 I 1 I Dd Water the gals wfw / - ----- f, \ \•�—' i' ',° Ei' 3��Otgjs- / / 4'/ .//� 1 1 I I 1 I II / I ( Hydrant 41\\ ` 1 --- og£ / \\\ , \\,$t/x x2yi' i,- 6�,r; � _ / 1\ \\ '1 1111 1\ 111 III 111 j 11 I I \\ II T ay.,pas Bryn 1\\\ \ \ 11 / 1 \, ,••a , r-- - -N_ iLT P , ign \, I %\ •�1 1 I' 1 `, 1 1 1 i ;�� \I '1 p�. 1 • \ 1\ ' \ \ I // / \ •-.. _ ..=cciL]]'=-�-' ,_ =, •s 1 \�' \\/\ l 1 \\ 1 1 I i 1 I i`\ 11 14. [fir \ \ 1��' I s s , ' -W x .. _..�_ +-•.- - / +/ ,C I\ \ \\ I / I I / 1 \ 1 _- yrprtY/he/ryhtalwoy 1 1 1 Approximate New 8 lteveaad -�, 79 +DII -+v /•�..�::'° / \\/ \\ \'� \\ \ / / I /' \`\ 1 iRypiy,s 6. New6 I— SOUTH prDposed und«ground,now«, / / __ ,--- 1 / _ 3 ae>:'Nce_7—/—w� / \ \ , \ 1 -ugv wP— Underground p°e> cable and hone services. -/ \ \' o\ A \ \ n '� s \yI\f%' BURLINGTON I / �` / New SMh#1 / \ \ \ �a\ �\ 1 \ -ws+ .rb— Underground 9br optic cable \\ \ - _331 `� _-_ - �/ / / \ / -378-e' I/ \ / \\\ '\f`. \\ \ \V ie\/\\ Underground the POLICE _ __ t -for wv— der ound gas \ + '_ �* / i`\,\ \ \� III"1 I \ ` -_____......A.,„, \/ \\41, \�' —•— — &rising water the SWIFT STREET -. i� ��ae // /\ �\ 1\\ \� / \/\\ -- - -— ow head pow/into SOUTH BURLINGTON, \ \- -_-- \ , / /,'q7� /' ' \ +"' \-°''' / / / / •� \ - //. A . .'�., \ �\1\I\e7�.Iex�168e�1Cd�f \� ".Si -se ,t— Exhrhq storm/h. 05403 lO • \\ \ \\ .--- -� \ \\% ,7' �p • 'A- -� - �\et �� �. . . y I �/\ \ / \\ _<� �\ . . • \,`\\ �j-\/ ` -` \` v rotting edge of woods CITY OF \ \ \ y / +° ; �,• "� q16'/`j j l .'l elk/ \ ,\ \ 'XA�``\ /` . - - \ Existing curb SOUTH BURLINGTON \ \\ \ \\_ / /' �Qi' / yt� _-/ ic°j �` ,'t ` `i/ I\-"\/ ----- ',t \ 4 �, �l',y \ IIIIII1IIII Exbf sfolrwa%\ /°°+ \ - //y/' sue\ �. .�1, \ -` \ \\\ --—►t.- proposed Iwtr the/gate tdw 575 DORSET STREET \ ? \ SOUTH BURLINGTON, \ \ ,st / to ..f ' \ :-,/ i \ (� `a` \ '\ \ \ —•—ate Proposed Sew/h./ma hde 05403 \ / t° f4 ` t \\ ‘; ;• \. ✓/ 00/ �.""." • .„ . ' \ \ \ \ TEL 802-846-4106 1 \�-'4 ' ''ef C71.�Yet18 ` \ • \\ _ Proposed tram Line/catch bosh FAX802-846-4101 3 / \ /,_ 7 ,r'- - r :wetlafld` 0 \\ �� ,.e/` • VamODtGas to.. . . .\a \ \\ �yj°� Existing Contour -�•� / \ / /�.c . \ `'w ✓/� I under BDd wetland. \r `'�\ \\ \• \ \ aau Proposed Ilnhh grade \ / )L._\ •�. \ £3 s7s.o /// /f• r—•—'�Y� �X� ��J` ......_ r \\// 1\ 1 .\. .I \ \ \\ \ \ I I nvs.skimmer \ 4 N. / ,® // , 1. . I...s\,_______ i,s-; . . . • II \ �%% . .\ .i \\ \\ \\ I Hand/cgrped*down ddhrofed by /4> \ •'/ \-+ J GJ3�\\\/ /' /,.t..t_.._r_..\=����" Z.� _ .\. r N. .r,d 11 \\ 11 79 \,, .\: \ \ \\\ \ cost Am rrumaarw domes o `\\ ,'- ,�C.) s� / , ' �f' --'i..,�._..._`----.._.._�k �* // � \ 1 'DOLE \ \ \\ \ \\ \ „ Proposed Wattage / % . \ �i \ e+. `' / �R�Iwe q. 'LIC �. \ /-�'----\/y \\ \\ \1 \ \`�\\\\ DRAWING TI1'18 sP / -7---,: __ �; Swift Street .'' ■ I 0\1�\ \ , \ \ SCHEMATIC ®� t1 I \ I SITE PLAN _ _ n p 5/ - / (o a =�i — -9— — — — I I I \ 1 I The intent of this drawing is DRAWN BY: TJB exlsav i — — — _ I \� to reflect schematic design New S #21/ \ ye —9— ■ I • 1DATE: 0005/08 -x. stop s/gn /�% / PS - �' /� ---.-9— -► I information for project scA� ' 90 / / -=—�—� � �9 C l pricing on/y.. DRAWING NO: / • —=__ 7hfersection� /e/ / / N. \� \ C— 1 \ See Sheet C-2 PROJECT NO:07234.I m os -7- 111 II n x1 m cn r z r —i i.. .. r w.. () N 3 n -0 rn n D A 0 0 -0 m h^- 3 A o m m D AO 0 O 3 D O n _ N Ql t` I- I- O Cl z � r ` y N D °- (9-1 n = z n z p Z O r N - N �1 (1 ii O - o rn O r cn m m r N N n O N m n O Z A z D T. n u .: �s - z A O n �' < < rn -1 --i rn .. 7' �$ n N rn n = n al 'Ili o O ... .. _ ! I \ A O N -I 2 N N z ? 0 D p Zl r II Z N 11 O T'I�"�I' I 7 z rn Z N corn 4 p, u� O A N r to % 1o1 El I rn E < O A D O 6 D • • • . i ��TI O -i N N -I N p A4 tiF 404 J m -< N P 1 u rI A n I "VAIL - , i �� E k ^J z V' % % Rr '' MII P O A� +_ K I Q j ;oil 242 I V I14-1-18: (5-I E Mlral z m O n• A Ar O O Ilik I 1111#11i - . tot N iilniF Oa'ic O s m •z O CM xi ,1, a , zz • e Z • ;:, _ ---,M.- - o z Cn tii n rn l-- t3v O I • : . r o I o - rn -rY o r % A . Ei �..,IIIII C Al • S�VVEE a r T k Z m O " z O ' r v "# til-1OD o A y k,; --.,-:',-]-WV1'.':'0';'Ali.i'ik-;*,,,lieikk 4iNiirK10-:.4,4%4AV*..;4:41tekliAl**4 b. o O O co I r n I I I rn y n z r t7 cn s (1 m m c () _1 D (1 O o rp z A m m D < O A x1 p m p m c 0 n A 2 , O p c 3 3 n 3 N fU D 0 O m z = z T fi c (� OD �T D Li N D r N (� N (l 13 p z_ O = r �_ m O r � cn m m N A cn n �_ 0 O m m 0 O z A D D D n cn II ,-- IIZ O (l G' < < -n J m n N m n _ < co m m O O A I = 0 N z cn m 00 - r0 D c s 7l z --1 -- ll -U D O p c zz O m z ON rn z O A 0 EN < O A > O 6 z -o A rn m 0 -I cn m z0 p to -<1 CO 0 I I I GU I I ]. I � o O x d z I -�- z z a -n rn Cn O C) m .. x4 ' '.�' x n e p `art a"� r r � -.- s INN ,-,. , _- -,-, ,- .- -% , _,-: -- 11 Firl 1›. 1;*4."°41 '' awrrr.--� A Z c o z m R. 0 N D 0 0 N co D A 0 I C) 0 1 0 N 0 0 03 li'"il'1lI�JI1i'1 co 0 11i1i'i1i1 i1i''ai1i'i'i1ii II j{IIilti L :1;:h 1ai'i i .I � m Ora' jjiyi' Z 3 , (1) 4 1 03 7. s T— z _ i o ttI- z Illl�llllHHI ° __ — e0 x 1 iIra- '10I _ y rnIL I.(= in , II AIU�IN1. `' 0 Mall 1111 1:IR11,. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiliiii nig :; = c, :151: ill ICI:. 1P: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII = 1 �. 1— 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIN 1 ' !s_€€ O- . ',i,::��':11:11i :;ILL, =Ull_-_ _ J .lip._ -1_:6,,.y9, 'lo�ll'iI 1811E__ _._ _-- II: _.,::!;.:„...,.,,...•,....,„„in.:, ill:1m ppbor =I D L ':iPi iili ±:, 'in': e15:.::. 1.101,11.11 Mini if;iF teEns.I, to En ZO oom, Li: Nco D i A O Z ! / 7 fii4- 1 N N O O CO .44 dite 1 I III rriagglir llEFEFEEtt... I'BM I:if:En II-_ . . �se;m a .:.,.. I I Atrial.tialltifittridirtater.41.0.1.i.4111.1.153.162 SOUTHELEVATION JUNE, 2008 1/8" = I'-0" SOUTH BURLINGTON NEW POLICE FACILITY ARNOLD & SCANGAS A R C H T E C T S © ARNOLD & SCANGAS ARCHITECTS 2008 N m op > cn ii H I` E O m m r m < D 0 z 11 low' .11'1'1111''',,''''.•:...11''',,'',:'''11111'11.'''''E.11'.11.11'1."'''I'....' 1, r 0 = Y� A CI) ,0 um 11,11411,1 (■ ililiiiil ': 1/111111,1 111,161,1.11,1,1 a THITIH I III y i "ikf Z 'y (fl 0-3a wu) O ' n In ■ , .,;, ig• 1e i Y (II n I l , 111.111, 11'■ 1I nr� -7! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIII 11IIIII9 I I Io I I IO n Or z N nj I. I I O 0 I I. I. I l � a = m ^E AAW OO @D - O i i mOn- OO m0O S O ? • im- A < E ;' OO O No O cF, lOA D N OA m3 n A j rW (m1 D � m W, O'a"! I, Nz E m i 1 m OD N < m< a v O O , 2a A Z A ' m c A - < O m D L p Z o z 6 m R.C N O 0 O D ib m D A 0 x O 1 O O SOUTH BURLINGTON DOG PARK COMMITTEE PHASE ONE REPORT June 16, 2008 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION Committee members included individuals from various South Burlington neighborhoods and backgrounds, and collectively own 11 dogs. Lisa Ventriss, Chair Jaimesen Heins, Vice-chair Joan Jarvis, Secretary Howard Goldberg Lori Valburn Claire Williams Staff: Tom Hubbard, Director, Parks and Recreation Department Council Liaison: Steve Magowan Input was also received from other interested parties: BJ Rogers, Executive Director, Humane Society of Chittenden County(HSCC); Barry Dagan, volunteer, HSCC; Chuck Brodsky, Burlington Dog Park; Wayne Gross, Director of Burlington Parks & Recreation Department; Betty Milizia; and David Scheuer, Retrovest. INTRODUCTION Since the Dog Park Committee's appointment by City Council in January, members have met monthly to fulfill its charge, which was to create an in-depth proposal for the creation of a fenced-in dog park in South Burlington. In addition, committee members spent a portion of their weekend time on site visits and related assignments. South Burlington 2007 records indicate that there are 850 registered dogs in the City, though 2008 registrations were down to roughly 400 as of April 1st, currently at 731. National statistics indicate that 40 percent of households own pets, so for a city roughly the size of South Burlington(7,000 homes), there are likely to be 2,800 animals. Because of the impending closure of the current Patchen Road dog park in 2010, and the adverse issues associated with Red Rocks Park, such as dogs harassing walkers and increased complaints to the Recreation Department by park users, it is necessary for 1 South Burlington to find a new site for a totally secure dog park. After six months of work, the committee is happy to present the findings of its Phase I work. METHODOLOGY In Phase One of our effort, reported in detail herein, committee members undertook a number of initiatives to help determine level of public interest in the creation of a municipal dog park; identify best practices for dog park standards; selection of and site visits to possible municipal lands; and a public stakeholder meeting. • Committee prepared a brief survey to be administered to dog owners who came to obtain their dog licenses at the City Clerk's office; the survey used a five-point scale to determine level of opinion on certain questions related to a municipal dog park usage and location (See appendix). • Committee gathered information on attributes, governance, operations, and location, from national associations and shared personal experiences at dog parks around the country. Members discussed the spectrum from"Gucci"-level features to more "basic" level. • Committee reviewed municipal map and other resources for possible locations of a dog park; preliminary screening of 14 possibilities yielded six sites that were subsequently examined in person by members. Members also received a presentation by private developer, David Scheuer, Retrovest, who has plans to build a dog park as a part of his South Village project(one of the proposed six sites); he has offered to build it and is willing to turn it over to the City of South Burlington to operate and maintain. (See appendix). The South Village project won't be ready until 2009-2010 and was considered to be a secondary choice by the committee. • Committee hosted a city-wide meeting for stakeholders, to which 21 citizens turned out to review progress to date and seek input and feedback on financing, park"needs vs. wants", governance, operations, and location. Interaction with members of the public was very positive. • Prepare report with preliminary recommendations to City Council in early June. The following Phase II will be undertaken upon endorsement and further direction by City Council. Phase II • Determine cost for dog park • Develop funding alternatives • Site analysis with DPW and other appropriate departments • Prepare update/communication with stakeholders • Governance of the dog park-operations • Identify on-going maintenance & costs • Establish rules for the dog park • Prepare final presentation and recommendations to Council • Public relations/communications 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Overall the 162 survey respondents and 21 attendees at the stakeholder meetings expressed quite favorable views on the value of a dog park to enhancing one's quality of life in South Burlington. (See appendix for survey results). There was also strong support for the process undertaken by the Dog Park Committee on behalf of City Council, and unsolicited offers of financial support and volunteer time were made by numerous individuals. A roster of what could be the beginning of a volunteer corps has been developed. I. Location The Committee conducted site visits to six potential park locations: Red Rocks Park; Butler Farms; Landfill (off Patchen Road); land adjacent to Dorset Park Natural Area and Calkin Farm; Technology Park; and South Village. The locations were evaluated according to the characteristics of'best practices' as established by the National Recreation and Parks Association(See appendix.)No one site met every criteria; each site has its own positive and negative attributes. And one site in particular was deemed to have many strong positives and a minor negative. ❖ The committee unanimously recommends that the South Burlington Dog Park be built at the Landfill site on Patchen Road, behind DPW. ❖ The site attributes include easy access to parking, water, open space, lack of immediate neighbors, easy access to staff support from DPW, plowing/moving services, and proximity to current dog park. The only downside was perceived to be proximity to the airport; however, experts from the Humane Society testified that noise orientation is good for dogs; only"explosive"noise is harmful to them. II. Financing At both the committee and public hearing levels there was a healthy amount of conversation dealing with how the City would need start-up and ongoing funds to operate and maintain the park. ❖ The committee clearly understands that the City can commit only a modest amount of funds to get the park underway, but that other immediate or long-term enhancements must either come from energized fundraising campaigns that target corporate and individual contributions, or wait for subsequent municipal budgeting cycles. ❖ Public responses indicate support for enhanced dog fees to help underwrite the ongoing maintenance of a dog park; said fees would also subsidize non-resident users of the park. Because of the difficulties in enforcement, 3 it was deemed unwise to impose a fee on non-resident users of the dog park. ❖ Other ideas included having a locked"fee box" on site that could receive contributions by appreciative members of the public; establish"Friends of the Dog Park" committee to undertake annual fundraising; seek corporate donations from"pet-centric" businesses. III. Needs versus Wants Throughout the course of our deliberations, the committee members recognized that the desires of the dog owner populace ranged from the elaborate or"Gucci" to the mundane or"basic" level of park enhancements. The National Recreation & Park Association lists standard features that are considered"best practice" (See appendix). Other amenities are desirable that add to the "entertainment" or "comfort"levels of the park; these are understood to be provided by funds raised separately. The committee is recommending that the following minimum features be included in the design: ❖ Property of two acres for the formal, fenced recreation area; ❖ Additional acreage for parking and expansion potential for individual or group training area; ❖ Heavy duty wire fencing of 5-6' in height; ❖ Double-gated entry; ••• Water hook-up; ❖ Enclosed small dog area; ❖ Storage shed and supplies including: poop bags, trash barrels, wood chips, and bag liners; ❖ Shade trees and benches; and, ❖ Bulletin board and sign. IV. Guidelines and Rules The Committee understands that the issue with creating policies means that someone must be empowered to enforce them. There is also an appreciation for clarity in how those policies are worded. The Committee members gathered information from the Burlington Starr Farm Dog Park and met with Parks Director, Wayne Gross, and Humane Society Executive Director, BJ Rogers, for insight into how parks "self-police" in the absence of officials. ❖ The Committee distinguished policies from guidelines, and anticipates that formal language would rely heavily on common sense behavior. There is no interest in putting volunteers into a position where they must enforce policies if there is the chance of potential harm to them. 4 V. Operations/Maintenance In the case of the Burlington Starr Farm Dog Park, the city has responsibility for the general operation of the dog park (e.g., general maintenance, waste removal); volunteers are assigned to various duties to operate the park on a daily basis. It is anticipated that the South Burlington Dog Park would operate in a similar fashion. ❖ Creation of a"Friends of the Dog Park"volunteer committee would provide on-going oversight and daily maintenance of the park: fundraising; open/close of park; stocking and resupplying the storage shed; providing information/education to the public; ❖ The Humane Society of Chittenden County and Department of Parks & Recreation expressed strong interest in linking their training programs (both human and dog)to the activities of the park. In this way, community education could become a regular offering in this unique venue. SUMMARY The South Burlington Dog Park Committee respectfully requests the City Council to endorse the findings of this Phase I effort. including the recommendation to locate the park at the Landfill, and to authorize the Committee to begin Phase II of the effort that will provide a finer level of detail and specificity to the actual design and cost of such a park. QUESTIONS FOR THE COUNCIL 1. What is the longer term vision (e.g., master plan) for the Landfill itself? The Committee recommends that future uses should be compatible with a dog park and the espoused public goal to have a healthy environment for human and animal users. 2. What is the Council's timeline for Phase II? The Council recommends the continuation of its work beginning this summer, with a delivery date that is synchronized with the City's budget cycle. Respectfully submitted, Members of the South Burlington Dog Park Committee. 5 '.es v 14-3 -' 1,w, i to 2 St-201 ey s DOG OWNER SURVEY The newly established Dog Park Committee appointed by City Council is exploring the possibility of establishing a fenced-in dog park in South Burlington. Your feedback to the following questions would be useful and much appreciated, and all information will be kept anonymous. Do you currently use any dog parks to exercise your pets? 1 2 3 4 5 Never Daily What would you fmd most useful about a dog park? (Please check all that apply) /0( location 99 socialization Q( safety Fel accessibility lit exercise 63 affordability 1 other(please indicate) If South Burlington established a new fenced-in dog park,would you use it? 1 2 3 4 5 Never Daily 9 11 '13 3-7 Do you believe a clean,safe dog park would make South Burlington a more livable community? 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Strongly Disagree Agree 13 6 20 ay SZ Would you be willing to pay a small increase in your dog license for use of a dog park in the City? 1 2 3 4 5 No Yes �2 1c is LC 19 Please check off the nearest facility to your home from the list below: S-O Airport 3\ University Mall So VN Golf Course 36 Shelburne Rd. Thank you!! Please leave survey in the large envelope with City Clerk. OPTIONAL Please contact me as an interested member of the community as plans for a dog park move forward... NAME email and/or phone COMMENTS: 1 N Map 8 w E • Community Facilities South Burlington, Vermont A/Town Boundary A/Roads Community Facilities I7 2 CITY OFFICES&POLICE 'i p FIRE STATION A SCHOOL ® LIBRARY ® SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY _ ® US POST OFFICE 10 4 a CEMETERY a CITY GARAGE / * Lamb.;t% 6 CLOSED LANDFILL a SOLID WASTE&RECYCLING FACILITY Recreation Land&Open Space MI CITY OWNED li ,,( � Sources: Tfr''pL.16,110_,Lifips 1:5,000 1999 Digital Orthophotos.City Assessor's Office. . � ' 1996 E-911 VCGI Coverages. • ' All data in NAD83,Vermont State Plan Ilt3{on Rd coordinate system.• Production by City of South Burlington Al 1 1 Dept.of Planning&Zoning,575 Dorset St., South Burlington,VT 05403. PH:802-846-4106. �� 11 1111011/1 / Q ■ ■ 4 Nwilip or. , Pill lli --"""--........„„,,„„....................1. 1 it 1611 IRA iti_.........., if M_ ' J �. • I kg I \16... At 410111 III 111111%11111 ,000 o toss F.., 4 Disclaimer C^ C.' t(p The accuracy of information presented is determined by its sources:errors and omissions may exist The City of South Burlington Is not responsible for these.Questions of on the ground location can only be resolved by site inspections,and/or surveys by a registered surveyor.Hence this rap is not sufficient for delineation of features on the ground. This map Identifies the presence of features, and may Indicate relationships between features,but is not a replacement for surveyed Information or engineering studies. 4 ' s 1 cubs . / Standards For Dog Parks • Land- one acre or more of land; land should be a safe, accessible location with adequate drainage and a grassy area that is mowed routinely • Fencing- area is completely enclosed, 5-6 feet in height • Gate- fencing should be equipped with a sturdy double-gated entry • Accessibility- entrance, facility, and parking must be handicap-accessible • Clean-up- tools for cleaning and supplies including shovel & dirt for filling holes, covered garbage cans with regular trash removal, waste bags and pooper scooper stations • Water Source-water for both dogs and owners • Seating- benches and/or tables with shade • Signage- signs must specify park hours and rules • Parking- adequate for area and in close proximity to site • Corral- area should accommodate an adequate, secure space for small dogs Other Considerations for site selection: noise, proximity to neighborhoods, geographic location, accessibility from surrounding area, environmental &health concerns, traffic, layout of land, overall suitability of site, amount of work and potential cost required to prepare and/or maintain site Some Other Amenities for dog parks Shelter Structure, Bulletin Boards, Agility and/or play equipment, Hose station, Landscaping, Bathroom or port-o-let facility for owners Other?? Community Benefits • Socialization and exercise for dogs & owner in a safe environment • Promotes responsible pet ownership • Provides elderly& disabled owners with an accessible place to exercise their companions • Enables dogs to legally run off-leash • Promotes public health& safety • Provides a tool for realistic enforcement of dog control laws • Provides a vital public space allowing people to meet and form the bonds of community • Others ???? Tidbits....fyi 40% of households own a pet 79% of owners give their dogs holiday or birthday presents 68%bring their dog when they travel 61% believe caring for their dogs fulfills their need to parent 33%talk to their dogs on the phone or through an answering machine while away 77% of dogs spend the night indoors 32% of dogs sleep in their owner's beds Page 1 of 1 ;P BUR! N 3T N PARKS AND RECREATION OFF LEASH DOG AREA FOR EVERYONE'S ENJOYMENT PLEASE OBSERVE THE FOLLOW=NG RULES: f DOGS PERRMITTED OFF LEASH INSIDE DESIGNATED AREA ONLY -OWNER MUST ACCOMPANY DOGS)INSIDE DESIGNATED AREA ALL'DOGS MUST HAVE VALID LICENSE AND VACCINATION TAGS -OWNER MUST MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE CONTROL 0;ER DOG BY VOICE. HAND OR OTHER MEANS AND POSSESS A PHYS'CAL RESTRAINT OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR FECES CLEAN UP €� -NOEODDORDRINKALLOWED ' ND VICIOUS DOGS ALLOWED AS DEFINED BY BURLINGTON Y x ORDINANCES SECTION 5•i,; NO FEMALE DOGS IN HEAT A PERSON MAY NOT TAKE MORE THAN THREE DOGS AT A T" E INTO DESIGNATED AREA TstEoPEi* iB?4of Tt13SAw.AC rPA4.1'ui #1>ir`rtAlk € k :kAm t i FCtsH A c:,'G MAJEPe.1.0,Nt.'T3:5CA'ier�c. t 11hTEE BITEt C'cTu-74.44:E tit u i t<.c: v.::?5 if"i;,r !P I#uTCaIPAAR?4 a',O+iEC EATiO!IPA'..: <r»ti.>':iI^C'.t"'' .`„ 7i `Y !iEEEi: THANK YOU TO ENTER THE OFF-LEASH AREA UNLESS THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY A PERSON OF AT LEAST EIGHTEEN "t YEARS OF AGE http://www.burlingtondogpark.org/Photos/etiquette2.JPG 6/11/2008 South Burlington Public Works :, /! 575 DORSET STREET "`;ti/% SOUTH BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05403 TEL:(802)658-7961 • � `" FAX:(802)658-7976 OFFICE 104 LANDFILL RC May 30, 2008 Ms. Lorraine P. Beckett, PHD 8 Winding Brook Drive South Burlington Vermont 05403 Dear Ms. Beckett, Thank you once again for your follow up letter of concern. We are going to be investigating the different types of plantings that may offer more screening for areas that my need it. I hope that this letter has addressed your concerns and I will keep you informed of our progress. If you have any further concerns please feel free to contact me by phone or by e-mail at bhoarasburl.com Sincerely, Bru e k. H ar Public Works Director CC: Chuck Hafter, City Manager Administrators & Boards CHITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT CSWD 1021 Redmond Road • Williston, VT 05495 802-872-8100 • Fax: 802-878-5787 • www.cswd.net June 2, 2008 Chuck Hafter City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Chuck: Enclosed please find copies of the Chittenden Solid Waste District Proposed FY 2009 Budget. CSWD is tentatively scheduled to meet with the City of South Burlington on Monday,June 16, 2008 at 8:15 p.m. Tom Moreau is scheduled to meet with the Town of Williston at 8:00 and following a conversation with Dennis,he mentioned that as the meeting gets closer,it may be possible for Tom to present at a later time.Please let me know if this will be possible. Please forward the larger bound copies to the Town Clerk, Town Manager/Mayor and/or Select Board Chair. Please forward the smaller stapled copies to each individual select board/city council member. The Board of Commissioners approved the FY 2009 Budget on Wednesday, May 28, 2008. Below is Section 4. (b) of the Chittenden Solid Waste District Charter. Within 45 days of the approval of the budget by the Board of Commissioners, the legislative body of each member municipality shall act to approve or disapprove the budget. The budget shall be approved if approved by the legislative bodies of a majority of the member municipalities. (For such purposes, each member municipality shall be entitled to one vote.)A legislative body that disapproves the budget must file with the Board of Commissioners a written statement of objections to the budget identifying those specific items to be changed, and failure to file such statement of objections within the forty-five (45)day period shall constitute approval by such municipality. A legislative body that fails to act to approve or disapprove the budget within the forty-five (45) day period shall likewise be deemed to have approved the budget. As stated above, each member municipality may choose to approve or disapprove the budget prior to July 14, 2008. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or if you need any additional copies of the budget. Thank you. Si er , AmyJev 1 Administrati Manager printed on recycled paper ) • CSWD FY 2009 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART FULL-TIME EQUNALENTS 3452 Board of Commissioners(18) -----d Finance Committee(3) --1 . Executive Board(5) General Manager(1) Marketing& Facilities Manager/ Administration/ Environmental & Safety Waste Reduction Director of Finance Communications Administrative Mn r. 1 Facilities Assistant Compliance Mgr. (.875) Biosolids (1) Coordinator(1) g O (2) p g Manager (I) I • Accounts Payable/ Quality Hazardous Education Special Projects Enforcement Payroll Assurance Waste Safety (2.23) (.26) (1) & Accounts Rec./ - I Licensing(1.85) I I Marketing Environmental Rover (.46) (.30) Depot (3.56) I I I I Community Research I & Personnel Reception Risk Mngmt. Property Admin. Programs Development (.80) Management Services Materials Recovery Intervale Compost Landfill/ Facility Program Operatio(s)Manager Transfer Station Engineering Special Waste Roll-Off Drop-Off Maintenance Future Projects Facility(1.17) Truck (1.74) Centers (9.5) (2.8) Development Capital Projects E CHITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS 5 YEAR PLAN INCLUDING FY 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET Detail of Expenditures 4/4/2008 ^ INCLUDING INFLATION STARTING IN FY'09 C 3% REMAINING FY09 FY10 FY II FY 12 FY13 TOTAL FY08 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL PHASE III LANDFILL Drainage Improvements SI0,300 . SI0,300 Replace Leachate Tank $84,872 $84,872 TOTAL PHASE III LANDFILL SO $10,300 S84,872 . SO $0 $0 $95,172 TRANSFER STATION Repurchase Transfer Station S2,185,454 $2,185,454 TOTAL TRANSFER STATION SO SO $0 S2,185,454 $0 $0 $2,185,454 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SO $10,300 S84,872 $2,185,454 - $0 • $0 $2,280,626 MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY Replace Scale S54,686 $54,686 Improve grading at scale S 15,000 S 15,000 Extra Aluminum Cage S2,500 $2,500 • Scissor Litt S 14,000 S 14.000 Vacuum S8,500 $8,500 3 c.y.self-dumping dumpsters(4 ea.) $5,1 50 $5,150 40 c.y.roll-off container(2 ea.) $8,240 $8,240 2 c.y.compactor&35 c.y.roll-off S 15,450 S 15,450 Replace#1 skid steer $41,200 $41.200 Replace#2 skid steer S42,436 $42,436 Design&Permitting of MRF Renovation S51,500 S.51.500 Renovation Componenets: Building addition-tip floor&processing area S265,225 $265 225 Refurbish original tipping floor S63,654 $63,654 �� Improvements to PGA system S26.523 S26.523 Pre-sort room yentillation improvements $10,300 $10,300 Cover PGA&uncrushed glass piles S31.827 S31,827 PET optical sorter S318,270 S318,270 Edyy current separator S63.654 S63,654 =8 news live bottom bunker S106,090 $106,090 Enclose refuse compactor S4,120 $4,120 Fiber room container conveyor S 10,609 $10,609 Container line superstructure modifications S 106,090 $106,090 Container line conveyor modifications S 106,090 $106,090 Container line enclosure modifications S53,045 $53,045 Magnetic separator $15,914 $15,914 Replace#1 forklift S23,340 $23,340 Add n2 forklift S24,040 $24,040 3 c.y.self-dumping dumpsters(4 ea.) $5,464 $5,464 Miscellaneous improvements $10,000 S10.300 S10,609 SI0.927 S1 1,255 S53,091 TOTAL MRF $104,686 $146,260 $1.243,375 S40,431 S11,255 $0 S1,546,007 SPECIAL WASTE PROGRAM WILLISTON DOCSWALA 12'cargo trailer for special waste S7,500 $7,500 Replace skid steer&attachments(net of trade-in) S56,650 S56,650 RecycleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 Gutters on Electronics Recycling Building S 1,500 $1,500 Outside Camera at DOC S6 I S S618 New signage $1,545 • $1,545 • Improvements for composting SI0,300 S10,300 Overlay/Patch roll-off container storage area $5,150 $5.150 Design DOE'&Special Waste Area S51,500 S51,500 Relocate Williston DOC S819.545 $819.545 Improvements to Special Waset Area 5551.827 S551,827 Replace 1995 John Deere 644-G bucket loader S I43,222 $143"' Miscellaneous improvements S5,000 $5,1 5n S5,305 S5,464 $5,628 $26,546 TOTAL WILLISTON DOCSWALA S14,000 $134,003 S148,526 S1,376,836 S5,628 SO $1,678,993 WOOD PROGRAM $0 SO SO SO SO $0 COMPOST PROGRAM Design&permitting of processing facility 5212,180 $2 1' 180 Page I of4 8:04 PM5 28,2008 CIIITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS 5 YEAR PLAN INCLUDING FY 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET Detail of Expenditures 4/4/2008 INCLUDING INFLATION STARTING IN FY'09 C 3% REMAINING FY09 FY10 FY 11 FY 12 FY13 TOTAL Li FY08 Constuctionofprocessing facility $2,185,454 S2,251,018 $4,436,472 TOTAL COMPOSTING $0 SO S212,180 S2,185,454 S2,251,018 SO S4,648,652 TOTAL SPECIAL.AVASI E. S 14,000 S 134,003 S360,706 S3,562,290 S2,256,645 SO S6,327,644 DROP-OFF CENTERS DOC ADMINISTRATION New roll-off containers $82,400 $87,418 S92,742 S262,560 Computers at DOCs $14,420 $14,420 Replace DOC cash registers((//$1,500 ea.) $3,278 S3,377 $3,478 $10,133 TOTAL DOC ADMINISTRATION $0 S96,820 SO $90,696 53.377 S96,220 S287,I 13 MAINTENANCE Finish Fueling Station 51,000 $1,000 Replace waste oil furnace S6,180 $6,180 Replace 1997 flatbed truck S56,650 $56,650 Equipment storage shed S31,827 $31,827 Landscape buffer area tv'tire.highway $1,061 $1,061 Replace mig welder wi mig/tig welder $4,244 $4,244 Replace 2003 I ton dump truck S53,045 $53,045 Commercial lawnmower $4,917 $4,917 TOTAL MAINTENANCE $1,000 S62,830 S90,177 $4,917 SO SO $158,924 ROLL-OFF TRUCK Replace'00 Kenworth roll-off truck 595.48I $95,481 TO 1.-AL ROLL-OFF IRIICK SO SO S95,481 SO SO SO S95,481 ESSEX DOC Replace 2 original compactors&chute S36,050 S36,050 Install bollards in front of bulks waste container $1,500 51,5 Install flooring in operator's booth S2.000 S2,0 Ness signaee $500 $500 RecicleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 New signaee $1,545 $1,545 Improve container pad apron $5,150 $5,150 Resurface 2nd half of entrance road S20,600 $20,600 Improve concrete compactor pad drainage S4,120 $4,120 Repaint steel superstructure S18,035. $18,035 Additional compactor $14,752 S14,752 Additional compactor installation $3,278 $3,278 TOTAL ESSEX DO(' $4,000 $70,555 S18,035 $18,030 SO $0 $I10,620 SOUTH BURLINGTON DOC Install flooring in operator's booth S2.000 $2,000 RecvcleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 New signaee S500 $500 New signaee $1,545 SI,545 Gutters on backside of building $4,120 $4,120 Pave apron around catch basin S515 $515 Improve&pant access to lower lot S5,I50 $5,150 Replace 2 original compactors&chute S36,050 S36,050 New platform for rigid plastic recycling $4,120 $4,120 Repaint steel superstructure S15.914 S15,914 ()scrim pavement S26,523 S26,523 Replace storage shed S3,278 53,178 Additional refuse compactor S 14.752 $14,752 Add additional refuse compactor installation S3,278 S3,278 TOTAL SOUTH BURLINGTON DOC S2.500 S54,590 S42.436 $21,308 SO SO $120,834 MILFON DOC RecscleBank modifications S3,090 $3,090 Ness siunage S500 $5f New signaee $1,545 S1,5 Replace original compactor S 1 1,330 S 11,330 Replace Incin-o-let 55,305 $5,305 Overlay access road&tip wall area S31,827 S31,827 Roof os er user area and bulks waste roll-off S 131,1_7 S 131,12_7 Page 2 of 8:04 PM5 282008 CHITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS.5 YEAR PLAN INCLUDING FY 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET Detail of Expenditures 4/4/2008 INCLUDING INFLATION STARTING IN FY'09 C 3% REMAINING FY09 FY10 FY 11 FY 12 FY13 TOTAL FY08 TOTAL MILTON DOC $500 $15,965 $37,132 S131,127 SO $0 $184,724 RICIMOND DOC Replace trash compactor chute $1,500 $1,500 Replace original compactor $9,500 $9,785 $19,285 New signage $500 $500 RecycleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 Overlay pavement to remove puddles $5,150 $5,150 New signage $1,545 $1,545 Replace Incin-o-let $5,305 $5,305 Roof over user area and bulky waste roll-off $131,127 $131,127 TOTAL RICHMOND DOC SI 1,500 $19,570 $5,305 $131,127 $0 $0 • '$167,502 HINESBURG DOC Replace floor in operators booth $2,000 $2,000 New signage $500 $500 RecycleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 New signage S1,545 $1,545 Design and permitting of relocated DOC S26,523 $26,523 Purchase land S265,225 $265,225 Construct relocated DOC $819,545 S819,545 TOTAL HINESBURG DOC $2,500 $4,635 $291,748 $819,545 SO $0 $1,118,428 BURLINGTON TEMP.DOC' RecycleBank modifications $3,090 $3,090 New signage 5500 $500 New signage $1,545 $1,545 • T OTAL BURLINGTON TEMP.DOC $500 $4,635 SO SO SO SO $5,135 ��'ZLINGTON PERMAMNENT DOC' Design&permitting $43,709 $43,709 Construct Ecological Park S5,627,544 $5,627,544 TOTAL BURLINGTON PERMANENT DOC SO SO SO S43,709 S5,627,544 SO S5,67I,253 TOTAL DOC S22,500 $329,600 $580,312 S1,260,461 S5,630,921 $96,220 $7,920,013 HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM UHW LATEX PAINT Ventillation improvements latex room $2,600 $2,600 Alarm for old boiler room $1,400 $1,400 . Plumbing for old boiler room S 1,800 $1,800 TOTAL LATEX PAINT S5,800 $0 SO SO SO S0 $5,800 U}IW ROVER IN Replacement Rover truck S43,709 S43,709 TOTAL ROVER IN SO SO SO $43,709 SO SO S43,709 UIIW ESQG SO SO SO SO SO SO UHW DEPOT Resurface drivethru&misc.pavement repairs S2,500 $2,500 Secondary containment for used oil tank S6,180 $6,180 Replace basement door S1,800 $1,800 Compressor and installation S4,000 $4,000 Structural renovation of next bay S58.350 S58.350 Sprinkler installation in basement of next bax S 10.609 S 10,609 Electrical&mechanical fit-up of next bay S15,914 $15,914 Replace forklift S24,040 S24,040 Roof'Gutter repairs and replacement $30,900 S30,900 Replace select siding on bldg S5,I50 $5,150 Replace outdoor haz store bldgs $42,436 S42,436 electrical and mechanical and alarm ter haz store bldt • S 10,609 S 10,609 ".."'k, Miscellaneous improvements $1,000 $5,150 $5,305 55,464 SI1,255 S11,593 $39,766 TOTAL U11\V'DEPOT $9,300 $47,380 S143,222 S29,504 SI 1,255 SI 1,593 $252,253 TOTAL HAL WASTE $15,100 $47,380 $143,222 $73,213 $11,255 S11,593 $301,762 BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM Page 3 of4 8:04 PM5 28/2008 CHITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT CAPITAL PROJECTS 5 YEAR PLAN INCLUDING FY 2009 PROPOSED BUDGET Detail of Expenditures 4/4/2008 INCLUDING INFLATION STARTING IN FY'09 d 3% REMAINING FY09 FY10 FY 11 FY 12 FY13 TOTAL %""'i FY08 BENEFICIAL REUSE I additional trailer S61,800 S61,800 Design&permitting of processing facility S530.450 S530,450 Constructionof processing.Facility S5,463,635 S5,627,544 S11.091,179 TOTAL BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM $0 S61,800 $530,450 S5,463,635 $5,627,544 SO SI 1,683,429 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Flynn Avenue Window Replacement S2,575 S2,575 Flynn Avenue- 1/2 roof replacement S25,750 S25,750 New garage roof- 1046 Redmond Road $7,210 S7,2 10 Replace roof-432 Redmond Rd S I0,300 S 10,300 TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $0 S45,835 SO SO SO SO S45,835 ADMINISTRATION Hot Water-on demand S5,150 S5,150 Convert to waste oil heat S 10,300 $10,300 Repair&expand shed SI,545 $1,545 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $0 $16,995 SO SO SO . SO SI 6,995 SPECIAL PROJECTS-R&D Used tent for waste sorting S3,278 S3,278 TOTAL SPECIALPROJECTS $0 $0 SO $3,278 S0 SO S3.278 SUBTOTAL CAPITAL COSTS $156,286 S792.173 $2,942,937 S12.588.761 S13,537.620 S107.812 S30,125,589 FUTURE PROJECTS Site 21 design&permitting S50,000 S257,500 S307.500 Wetlands Mitigation S5,000 S106,090 Sl 11,090 Site 21 design peer review S20„600 S20,600 Site 21 Purchase S4.000.000 54.000.000 Purchase of additional property S5.000 S 128.750 5795.675 S929,4 Phase I construction&initial site development S43,709,080 S43,709,0, TO-1 AL FUTURE PROJECTS S60.000 S4,5 39,056 S901 765 $43.-09 O80 SO S0 549.209,901 TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS S216,286 S5.199,023 S3,844.702 S56.1_97,841 513.537.620 S107,812 579.203,284 =Items which have reached the contracted end of life per the MRF Operating Agreement Page 4 of4 s:v4 1'M5 28 2nn8 CSWD ANNUAL BREAKDOWN OF SURPLUS AND DISTRIBUTION TO INVESTMENT RESERVE ACCOUNTS B. 2000- 2007 Surplus PER ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT Per Change in Capital Capital Asset FY CA Net Assets Expenses Purchased Depreciation Bond Principal 2000 $ 1,218,603 $ 907,243 $ 362,434 $ 595,308 2001 $ 1,461,328 $ 1,174,575 $ 266,089 $ 321,257 $ 355,000 2002 $ 672,688 $ 662,569 $ 777,214 $ 768,802 $ 380,000 2003 $ 913,724 $ 800,553 $ 2,563,404 $ 2,468,516 $ 400,000 2004 $ 1,186,242 $ 955,720 $ 759,199 $ 672,803 $ 468,845 $ 340,000 2005 $ 1.307,699 $ 1,331,542 $ 906,821 $ 819.741 $ 539,268 $ 410,000 2006 $ 544,259 $ 372,655 $ 197,580 $ 319,509 $ 559,905 $ 435,000 2007 $ 720,000 $ 945,781 $ 396,649 $ 379,956 $ 662,966 $ 440,000 � 3 v 57 $ 7,150,638 $ 6,229,390 $ 6,345,892 °� ANNUAL TRANSFER TO FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT RESERVES (Per Board Minutes) TOTAL FY MSW MRF SP WASTE DOC HAZ WASTE BIOSOL PROP MGT FIR 2000 $ 175,809 $ 407,034 $ - $ 119,485 $ - $ 30,198 $ - $ 732,526 2001 $ - $ 140,678 $ 87,631 $ 7,271 $ 63,461 $ 555 $ 14,074 $ 313,670 2002 $ 502,000 $ 55,091 $ 6,042 $ 23,988 $ 587,121 2003 $ 10,562 $ 102,168 $ 87,037 $ 39,058 $ 169,230 $ 2,381 $ 6,212 $ 416,648 2004 $ 1,820 $ 81,037 $ 67,809 $ 49,194 $ 56,163 $ - $ 8,936 $ 264,959 2005 $ - $ 372,931 $ 94,120 $ 23,963 $ 22,460 $ 11,455 $ 641,128 $ 1,166,057 2006 $ 82,952 $ 131 $ 20,318 $ - $ 6,511 $ 377,061 $ 486,973 2007 $ 30,099 $ 265,772 $ 39,707 $ 152,670 $ 82,813 5724 137579 $ 714,364 $ 218,290 $ 1,954,572 $ 376,435 $ 467,050 $ 394,127 $ 62,866 $ 1,208,978 $ 4,682,318 ANNUAL TRANSFER TO OTHER RESERVES(Per Board Minutes) TOTAL TOTAL ALL FY •ICP FDR FCR OTHER TRANSFERS 2000 $ 28,596 $ 14,149 $ - $ 42,745 $ 775,271 2001 $ - $ 131,917 $ 41,503 $ 173,420 $ 487,090 2002 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 587,121 2003 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 416,648 2004 $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ 664,959 2005 $ - $ - $ $ - $ 1,166,057 2006 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 486,973 2007 $ - $ $ - $ - $ 714,364 $ 28,596 $ 546,066 $ 41,503 $ 616,165 $ 5,298,483 1_1:ATMOREAU\FinabceAHistor'cal IntoA Surplus Information Annual Total per audit 6/16/2008 5:15 I'M CRITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT A • Summary of Reserve Funds ACTUAL BALANCE PER ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FY Fl R FDR ICP FCR LFPC TOTAL RESERVES 2000 1 ,799.300 1,955,695 93,627 33,899 1,273,0'06 4,655,587 2001 ),370..330 2,6'04,949 127,986 75,402 1,282,321 - 6,460,988 2002 2.445,124 2,659,319 162,975 7.5,402 1,313,026 6,655,846 2003 1.581,010 . 2,135,879 198,440 117,592 1,30'0,415 5,333,336 2004 1,607,029 2,657,427 202,741 116,903 1,452,670 6,096,770 2005 2,232,448. 2,801,276 122,012 161,374 1,497,087 6,814,19'7 2006 2,951,170 • 2,706,648 153,743 221,484 1,497,011 7,530,056 2007 3,489.168 3,017,844 57,710 236,259 1,608,.214 8,4'09,195 * FIR INDIVIDUAL BALANCES PER CATEGORY PER FISCAL YEAR FY MRF SP WASTE DOC HAZ WASTE BIOSOL PROP MGT Total FIR '000 540,1)72 151,088 479,272 31,760 96,968 - 1,299,360 2001 8I2.445 108,176 508,278 270,628 130,807 539,9'9'6 2,370,330 2002 1.276.635 94,023 558,449 273,265 216,747 26,005 2,445,124 2003 630.118 187,792 4,82,640 49,089 211,117 20,254 1,581,0.10 2004 55 3,13 1 259,620 482,056 109,107 211,928 51,187 1,667,029 2005 796.508 358,938 413,093 118,9'00 215,79'9 32'9,210 2,232448 2006 I .. 123_ 136 371,322 397,708 132,531 192,279 734,194 2,951,170 2007 1_,42,595 522,115 335,437 241,947 229,888 417,186 3,489,168 1=1R = Faci1ftOES Improvement Reserve's FDR = Future Dcvelopmcr1t Reserves I('1' - Intervale Compost Products FCR = Facilities Closure Reserves LFPC - Landfill Post Closure Reserve UvTMORFAtil ihmtt.',.IiistoOcalInfo\ Surplus infamiation Annual Balances per audit 6J1'6/210O8 5`107 ARNOLD & SCANGAS Building Construction Cost Estimate ARCHITECTS 2008 SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE FACILITY DIVISION 2 DEMOLITION-SITE $2,424 DIVISION 2 SITEWORK $886,351 SITEWORK $437,481 SITE UTILITY PIPING $189,261 SITE IMPROVEMENTS $44,217 LANDSCAPING ALLOWANCE $51,000 PAVING & SURFACING $164,392 DIVISION 3 CONCRETE $213,360 DIVISION 4 MASONRY $196,896 DIVISION 5 METALS $119,052 STRUCTURAL STEEL $81,939 METAL FABICATIONS $37,113 DIVISION 6 WOODS AND PLASTICS $612,890 ROUGH CARPENTRY $437,601 FINISH CARPENTRY $86,267 ARCHIIECTURAL MILLWORK $21,022 BUILTIN CASEWORK ALLOWANCE $68,000 DIVISION 7 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION $363,975 DAMPROOFING $8,996 INSULATION $135,997 SIDING $33,706 ROOFING $184,108 SEALANTS &CAULKING $1,168 DIVISION 8 DOORS AND WINDOWS $249,859 DOORS &FRAMES $48,720 HOLDING CELL DOORS $24,753 SPECIAL DOORS $9,420 WINDOW SYSTEMS $90,941 SECURITY WINDOWS $13,577 TUBULAR SKYLIGHTS $12,347 DOOR HARDWARE $46,601 GLASS &GLAZING $3,500 DIVISION 9 FINISHES $429,109 GYPSUM BOARD SYSTEMS $154,144 CERAMICS &TILE WORK $47,410 ACOUSTICAL TREATMENTS $53,177 FINISH FLOORING $85,632 PAINT&WALLCOVERINGS $88,746 DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES $103,902 VISUAL DISPLAY BOARDS $8,237 TOILET PARTITIONS $19,744 ACCESS FLOORING $22,700 FLAGPOLES $6,494 SIGNAGE $7,179 METAL LOCKERS $25,353 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS & CABINETS $1,500 TOILET ACCESSORIES $12,695 DIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT $27,415 PROJECTION SCREENS $2,927 RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES $5,644 HOLDING CELL BENCHES $18,844 DIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS $9,842 BLINDS $5,076 RECESSED ENTRY MATS $4,766 DIVISION 14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS $61,000 DIVISION 15 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS $121,068 DIVISION 15 HVAC &PLUMBING SYSTEMS $1,066,615 DIVISION 16 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $796,545 BUILDERS RISK INSURANCE $1,700 PRINTS & SPECS $2,000 TEMPORARY UTILITIES $44,935 TOTAL DIRECT WORK $5,308,938 ARNOLD & SCANGAS ARCHITECTS SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE FACILITY June 13,2008 Site&Building Construction Costs $5,308,938 Builder General Conditions(10%) $530,894 Builder Overhead&Profit(5%) $291,992 Builder Payment&Performance Bond(1%) $61,318 Escalation to 2009(6%) $371,588 Estimate Contingency(8%) $525,178 Total Estimate of Probable Construction Cost $7,089,909 Permits: Act 250 Application Fee $33,677 Construction Stormwater Permit(ANR) $500 Stormwater Discharge Permit $1,500 Water Supply Permit $350 Water Supply/Wastewater Disposal System Permit $1,000 Labor&Industry Construction Permit $38,994 Water Dept.Tap-in Fee Waived Impact Fee Waived City Building Permit Fee Waived Soil Borings $5,000 Materials Testing $12,000 Power Company Charge $15,000 Furnishings $231,000 Mobile Shelving $50,000 Door Access,Security&CCTV $195,000 Dispatch Radio/Communications/Consoles/Radio Tower $268,000 Telephone Equipment $103,000 Data/Audio Equipment $103,000 A/E Design&Construction Administration Fees $638,092 Clerk-of-the-Works(Part Time) $36,000 Builder's Risk Insurance(0.35%) $24,815 Project Continency(10%) $708,991 Total Estimated Project Cost $8,786,022 ALTERNATE 1: Install bullet-proof glass at Dispatch exterior windows in lieu of standard glazed windows ALTERNATE 2: Install 2x4 acoustical ceiling panels in lieu of 2x2 ceiling grid ALTERNATE 3: Upgrade emergency generator to operate full functions of building w/AC ��111p �� _ _ IIllilllllll110!' ''11i1 II f I: l IIIIIII' 2V\NN _ emspv V li—xl ram;=� !em n n n n I I n r�� rm� n mi n JUNE. 2008 SOUTH ELEVATION I/8" = I'-0" GTON NEW POLICE FACILITY S ARNOLD & SCANGAS A R C H I T SOUTH BURLIN E C T © ARNOLD&SCANGAS ARCHITECTS 3008 i )N"DIA.SOLADE.SKYLIGHT )1•_O•VV —.fib i g-0 FIBERCE LENT SHINGLES(TTP.I FOOT-nuLTI-PYI[v0.!l� o /11 II1 111 y W L--*! :k. / _ - 6/1x WO ACCENT BOARD N ..ill .. ..... `..l :r ° � nAFVIN DN�u0000ezTeaoa DOOR IAl _i FIBERGLASS COLUMN riTP l __. TO FIRSTaP,$) a fill ''' \ • STANDING MAD AED METAL ROOFING. PRE111 1 •1111 111 I■ 111 r t'YD.CORNERpOwpD ITYPI 111 r NpRRCENEN::::::::r:":::::::::s 1.:•,::::. L-• + (� -INARVIN CLATO SOCDP- • �1: ep—"n((�� SW�D DR 1111 . �. 111 11111111 — ___ TO PIRG EAST I WEST ELEVATIONS JUNE. 2008 SOUTH BURLINC.ITON NEW POLICE FACILITY ARNOLD & SCANGAS ARCHITECTS © ARNOLD R SCANGAS ARCHITECTS 2008 / ; ' /"/ ,/ �/ /' ---' /'' ', , I I / j a it A D&•CA I 1 / / ' - 'Y �'' ` `�♦ I / l , ARNOLD k OCANOAL , , 1 1 / / '' , /' • ' �� ``♦ 1 ; / I / ANCHITLCTS I 1 I I •A , / p 9 I / , , ` 1.4 / / / I I 1 , I I I / LI•. Ira 68 j' I I , 1 / ' / / ' I 1 I ' I / / a i' �,' . l I i 1 \x� MSS A L4i9A6 / 0. /' /' ' / ' ' / / / $7g' 4. .� \♦♦ \\.. i• / \\ _ Ii _ \♦i I . s.`‘, -'• 1. ` 111 I I CCALAINO EN41lE0R \%\ / / // ' / - —'--/ A3 y --�rf' \ \ W� •jk k • ' ♦\, ,1 - \`. i i I oe.........,...« / ,` \\ `b. ' ;/ %// / "'i 2y, ^�eA�h111r / .3 Fdx , 4A i\ 1 �RI\ I 1 /1// \ -' ''/ i ', l I / , sq 1-, ' 1 j h L f -'d`\ ' I I 1\.< Tr a'I..'-1 I. / LrnaTaY4 ' ,/ / /-'-1* --N� 1 py / / '/ W eft " �,.,,� r , £ �.§a m 1 I 1/ 1 , IL, ' / / / ///--'� • - /wir i - 1 ( / / :A.• F r k`4f Sam— d $ 1 1 } ,.', 1 '1 I L� 76 / ''/•/ ////--' r• -'� l`\ 1 / $ P'� � .FJ �/•"7 `•/F Z I t-/-` :/i f-I i I Leland , ; /I l V J • ' LI ' (.. k'.L°. h. '/ • GrwwY=-- I ..r } .,F se.rMr ,( I / / ,"' 1.,//7 "`u■d�'by �� •aAy y '�' /1 I I / / / / - I , q n•..•r rant ORTLCVdI�NOCW �� { ; i \ A a 1 `/ �- - / 'I ..1 %uj y /!`/•e'g 11/ 11 I, I / 1 I o ulml w'• ' %/ , h 'I 1 I , I \\' lb,:� -_/ 4 �''j f i .Z 1 \Y I I 1 1 1 i / , I ... / / l 1` -_-_� 1� /' 1'?'' _36. / / a1/ 1, ' ' 1 , ; , , I 1 , W Mr.kr wd..�w /I/ -;-- _ ` .� • ----- Tuu73p 'F1 j/Yt� 'tit; a1 I I 'i i J , 1 �,.,r a • 1 I ofi ;: • 6 1�� I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 9.M M+Li. ,1\,\\\ ` 1 /; � / ��' ,.g.�_ N..j ' --\ ; t V II\l�• ' \ \I Ii I, 1 1 I l III i Iw aa.w. i�t I 1 , I I I . 1 • l I' Apa„emcloaDma !bar rD/pydeeied 1 _ / h / , / 1 I 1 Y • /' Narb•p f'�'1 j`_..—..; /.• \\ ♦ ,/ \ \ I •/ / / / ` II • \ \ \ IA•o•e•ame,�4eA*�. _/ _ - �- s'' "'eT/»LT�r /\ \�• , / / —,� SOUTH \e^k�AP6meiavl0ei gmSA01l / , / .Tir '✓ BURLINGTON 1 'y nl.,:/ ` i .I Isaee...4 A.erM m.4 \"\ \`-----� I / I - ,. N / 378 / �♦ / \ '`•`o��\�iY�,\�t�� '��� 1 POLICE \��♦ \\��\ I / / ?+ ' • �� i.,':' a .4•'' -- / %/ \ ``Y • �'�W,,111,,Iy I a lit*V4 V``'7•�;t _.___—n,.l,..+r.+.w.' SOUTH 540BURlINGTON. \\ ` - \ , \. A 4F `.'"6•' % ; �-/_ \'/ i / •!i :1i ```'`. w n.r sown CM UWLIfTON 05403 \\ \♦ .'@�' ' -' % / ---s. . ',N.,;( \ . N. - ---—e«� .k... 0T6 DORBLT BTRZE•1• ♦ ♦ ,> - / /. . .. . ` - . .1. .\\. \` `` ♦ w...r Asa.I /i>e w 90tJTt1 DURILIGTON. ♦ ..g��r,, I /Y' ♦ 41• ,/ ,0a/ ♦ \ . ..�`L•• \' \ \♦♦\ ` .�..o- n.w/.m•n[wuSeM sew TC1:00Y-D/0-410L \`�C �- � \ /___ \\ '-'� • ✓�/ ,/' VemastiGnb '-"--- T' "\ \\\ \\ ♦\♦`♦♦ ��* — oen.•a.r.. YAlI:90Y-E46-41ot / ..i�'' / \d+na / - ... \\ \ ' 1 / .dLnrard d` ... ..\ \ \\ \ \ n.ww AN...w a ' `` •AI' \` , if ''/ /� 1 -♦�-:1� 4 1 1 i� c ;`. \\ \\ \\ ♦\ nw.//M..,wwrsr r N \\`�•\ :7_____i___...____ a SCE - - - 0400.0 MR t •• ef / - /Ir a �_ I, SwiRStreet,,'' 1 pl 1 SCHEMATIC �� r,v _ I \ 1 SITE PLAN "'� / �7� '—— ——.—_ i , 1 The intent of this drawingis ..L L,TA, Nit�!4A°t/ .rm,y '—— —— — 1 , I to reflect schematic deign �+L••/••n. / /' / �`� / A. .� .—-_ - 1 I j information for project 'e"k '''" / / -_--_�-_. -�� ?ems cis C� ; pricing on/y. L� —M—�- a r See Sheet C-2 o :ii, : ..7,-„wr. ,-1,,F4.-,1- 4-7-, - - ,:-, -- -,; "k5 ,x'a'e .iS% L .+ .'. t ��,t,..i " ems... dy ,vtirs..,An -,- x . .. . 1.-,.:. - I - fi .g� - ilti _ ,1�a: to 2� <. ,- ` a4 a tl ➢70j }k < -4 2)".P ,L ..y.N P ,��ie' �L'td l 1 s g U � z � �s Z Q x 3 Y Irvn.',%''Eril'i-1,7,„."7+.7,iii 1...":-.7,'''''' EIMII _ n_/ 4 �- -_ I CO K ; �—11111 .. , ., ,,, ,,.,.„,, _ ,Ir,t„,.„,, ..,., . ,,„. .1,,,5„ 4...„,,„,,,,,,.?, ,_ ` . ct) .. ...t ,,2,: ,,,,07_, #1.1m1 : ,,,,„ I___FI .. ' ,,,,,,,,,,. 0--.[ ' _ _.,'' - .7..w.:4,,,zr....,,-,47,1 ipr, 2. U < l aN ,tsj F OO a 7 N I ��z ,F ON zO O I . ,`. Y :I� f� §S, a In ';�; 0 � . >U 0 b�" _ 22 2'2 ' W\ O W ;X ` II p'N W N ttJ I S a N N 1 I_ i O U ( ,4 5441.1 I Q w U r ZUN 5.ys _ I- O Wd d U C Um W 0 W O U -Q 03 O U1 •irop...e.soui„,......0,,t ? City of South Burlington i � 1`i' 1 it 575 DORSET STREET r i i*It u,�,� SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 _ _ TEL. (802) 846-4107 E''_�� •`` FAX (802) 846-4101 �s '4�+� CITY MANAGER dhFp�TOWN M'a��A CHARLES E. HAFTER June 16, 2008 Chair and City Council City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Discussion on Date for Town Meeting To all Members: At their meeting on May 28, 2008, the School Board agreed to request that the City Council change the meeting date for city wide voting on City and School Budgets to the first Tuesday in March, beginning in 2009. The current City Charter language is as follows: §13-502. Time of holding (a) The annual city meetings of the city and the South Burlington school district for the election of officers, the voting on the budgets if required by the provisions of this charter, and any other business included in the warnings for said meetings, shall be held on the third Tuesday in May, unless otherwise legally warned by the council. This proposed date coincides with the traditional Vermont Town Meeting Day and will advance the budget preparation by approximately 11 weeks. Please have a discussion on this matter and if appropriate schedule a public hearing. Sincerely, EL)A -- Charles Hafter City Manager Page 1 of 1 Denis Gravelin From: jeveritt@sbschools.net Sent: Thursday,June 05, 2008 5:49 PM To: Chuck Hafter; Denis Gravelin Cc: dgilroy@sbschools.net Subject: 2 items 1)The School Board came to a general consensus at their May 28, 2008 meeting to request that the City Council change the date for the city and school district budget votes to the first Tuesday in March beginning in 2009. 2)The Board will be appointing two members to the city Real Estate Committee at their June 11 meeting. They would also like me to see if is appropriate to close out the Oak Creek Village Committee. It could be that the Real Estate Committee could spin off a committee in the future if necessary to take up some of the issues discussed in the Oak Creek Committee. Let me know what I need to do next with these items. John E PS. David and I had a wonderful session with Tom and Todd about collaboration. This email may contain information protected under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act(FERPA) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA). If this email contains confidential and/or privileged health or student information and you are not entitled to access such information under FERPA or HIPAA, federal regulations require that you destroy this email without reviewing it and you may not forward it to anyone. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner ,C1amAV and Bitdefender, and is believed to be clean. 6/6/2008 Ytx YYx I�Fc,pN`'4% .%Cji °.d p �' SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT " fsiiViA.t.... ( 0.414.. • �� A row*Mx c 44, 29 May 2008 To: South Burlington City Council From: Todd Shepard, Captain 71$ Subject: Consolidation Study Dating back to the late 1960's and early 1970's, various conferences and studies have been conducted in Vermont that have included the topic of consolidation efforts. The most recent initiative for municipal organizations was entitled VISION 2000 which surrounded dispatch services. The Vermont State Police have moved forward with the centralized 911 centers and consolidation of their dispatch stations, which serves as a good example for the success of consolidation. Recently, this same topic has come to the forefront of discussions and has prompted action at the local level. Last fall, Burlington Police Deputy Chief Mike Schirling hosted several meetings with Fire, Police, and City government officials to see if there was still an interest in pursuing consolidation of dispatch services. Across the board, nearly everyone was in favor of this concept in this county. Several months have passed with limited follow through on the part of the numerous Chittenden County Agencies that initially wanted to be a part of the effort. Last week, four agencies (Burlington Police, South Burlington Police, Winooski Police, and UVM Police)met and have decided to forge forward to develop a solution. The feeling was that we start small and let it grow. The four agency committee decided that we needed to update the latest studies as our first step, following the receipt of formal commitment letters/memos from the involved agencies. Part of this commitment is to aid in the funding for the updated study if other alternatives could not be found. For the time being, the group needed someone to take the lead of getting this off the ground and being that the South Burlington Police have always been leaders in the area, I have taken on this temporary responsibility. The ultimate goal sought by these four agencies is the control of costs associated with the duplication of effort by all involved. We are still at the very infancy stages of this process and with your support, we will move forward and strive for success. Thank you. 575 DORSET STREET,SUITE 2 • SOUTH BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05403-6295 Dispatch: 846-4111 •Administration: 846-4165•Fax:846-4102 Trevor S. Whipple, Chief N.VVLMEIoy �� SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT4t 0.14 (a:) trjA, Doe 2 June 2008 To: Consolidated Emergency Communications Planning Committee From: Charles Hafter, City Manager Subject: Memorandum of Commitment This memorandum will serve as official notification of our intent to be involved in the planning process for the consolidation of emergency dispatch services into a regional communication approach to providing public safety dispatch services. The City of South Burlington remains committed to the belief that consolidation of certain services can lead to increased effectiveness and to cost savings or, at a minimum, cost control over the long term. In an effort to further our commitment to this process, the City of South Burlington will contribute a maximum of$3,500 during FY 2009, providing other sources of finance are not available, to have the Vision 2000 and Rand reports updated to the current year and to provide this committee with in-kind support of planning committee representation as needed. 575 DORSET STREET,SUITE 2 • SOUTH BURLINGTON,VERMONT 05403-6295 Dispatch: 846-4111 •Administration: 846-4165•Fax:846-4102 Trevor S. Whipple, Chief �� ....QTOM,Ypq., City of South Burlington +,• r + 4 1�)(I�� 575 DORSET STREET [f�i/y`��'!�� ,. SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 05403 __ _ Z. TEL. (802) 846-4107 +% •`• FAX (802) 846-4101 L����•, CITY MANAGER BhF. TOWN M'. CITY E. RAFTER June 13, 2008 • Chair and City Council South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Report and Update on Police Facility, Police Chief Trevor Whipple and Rebecca Arnold, Arnold and Scangas To All Members: On Monday evening, Chief Whipple and Rebecca Arnold will present the cost estimates of the proposed Police Facility and more details of the proposed design. I have not yet received a copy of any information to share with you but will do so via e-mail if I receive any prior to the meeting. The Police Committee will be meeting at 6:00 before the meeting to review the information and make any suggested changes. This would be an appropriate time for Council to discuss the proposed site and the proposed size of the facility before any final question is placed on a ballot. Sincerely, N Chuck Halter City Manager CSWD Operating Surplus by Year Year Surplus 20001 $1,218,603 2001 $1,461,328 2002 $672,688 2003 $913,724 2004 $1,186,242 2005 $1,307,699 2006 $544,259 1 2007 $750,000 j Total: $8,054,543