HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB-89-0001 - Supplemental - 1535 Spear StreetIli lit ill, I. I ?:1; I I I', /.I I^: I Ni,' Itl1,\Icll I IF \I,.II: ;'I'`il'' I
nylti t n nr r'dnnr' 1- I t.h tir r t I un 4 I li}1 r,t t hr 1' 1 7r11t1 t rat' \
1 ) l'hu t Lhc I-tt II I rr un I cltI pitys i ctt 1 c I I'r.0ill s I.aIt q- or c and t t. I Ilrlr:
IitI tiding i rregulrtri ty, narrowness or- shitI Iowness of lot
sIZe or sit Itpe, or exceptional topogruhica1 or othet- physical
condit.ioits peculiitr to the particular property, +tad that t.hv
unn(IC essa ry hrt rash i p i s clue to such cond i t i on , itnd not. Lhe
c:ircutit stitit s or conditions 9cnerrtIly created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in Lite npigh 094 or
district in Which the property is located;
(2)'. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable u e of the
property; w _
(3) That such unneces
appellant; 7
i n
ry hardship has not b ens create by he
� � �.f i-1- 1 = > ,
(4) % That the variance, if authorized, will not al`fcVr`''the ' '//
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
proper/Ly, nor be detrimental to _the publj,c„welfarg- O 1%C
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification rs ible of the zoning regulations and of'
the plan.
Appea 1 = - --
A p p a l l tint
Flo Le: Yes ��� No j Sign
Use Reverse side for additional f•indirigs
rt Fli lit il;I.INt;ft tt.` 1Nt; Itt+f\I(It ttl 11r.11:1;'I'`il:':'I'
I t ttri 1 ngti r it nr trrclrtnc'r• = r I It tier 1 I rtn ! 11;1{ r,f t.ht I' l itIItI t r t 1
Ilr• I ttl)III r•rtt Ac t
1 I ) l'lla 1, t.t►c re it re till ► clue phys i Ca 1 c 1 rrum : Laricq.—, r+r c�c,nr1 ► 1, r un.c ,
I ac l lid I lig i rregli I it r i t.y , fill r'rowr►ess , or shell I o%4rIvsti of, l o t
titze or shale, or exce1)Lionrtl t.opogrnhicaI or other physical
eonclit.ions peculiar Lo the particular properLy, it rid that the
unncrcessar-y Itardsh i l i s due Lo such coed i L i oils , and not. the
circ:timstarices or coedit.ioil s 9enernI1y crenLed h}• the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhoo or
district .n which the property is located;
(2), That because 'of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessa y to enabler the reasonable se f the
property;
(3)
( 4 )
That "such
appe,l pant
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
pro pt�ynor be dxkrimentathlic we ,,- .rZAIo
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification o�ssible of
the zoning regulations and of
t. h e plan.
Appea 1
A p p r- l /tint��%�
Votes .. Yes L_.1 No V-
1 Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
:;t+l I'll Ill+l(I.I dl I t+'• t+.` I N1; Itc+,\Itl1 III 11 .11' I II ': I
I I rlrl 1 n�ti I rr IIr'- r�rcir111+'I• I I tir r't I r+rr 1 Il ri rrl t i+r I' I +�rrti I t r \
IIr r l ul+mr•n t A l
1 I ) I'hat. there are un I yue phys i ca 1 c. I r'clltrl;;ti►nc:es err eland 1 t. 1 erns:
inc:lkid III; ir•1-(.gkiIitr-it.v, narrowness, or sha►I Io1.4ri ss c,I lot
size or shape, or exceptional topog1-01icaI or other physica►I
conditions peculiar Lo Lhe particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is clue Lo such conditions, and not. the
circumstances or conditions >`enertilly created by the
provisions of the zoning; regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located; p
(2)-. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
• regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore newweg�ssary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; No
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; w ,
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
t. h e plan.
Appeal
Appal Cant
Grote.: Yes No ti i gn
Use Reverse side for additional findings
:i(rl Ili lil Ali I. I �J1;'I'( r.'. ,'.(iti I Nf; It( 4\I. I � r rl' �11�.1I:ti'I'?i1•:N'I
1 rft(i1nos. 1n ( r'(tnft 1I.Ir S r t I(rft I I f I H r(I the I'Iminrr r'
( I ) That Lh(rrt. rtr'(r lift I(Itic physical r:II-collitit,►nc(rti nr- (:(trt(111.1()nrc,
in(:lkid Ili; irr(rgulrtrIt.}•, narrowness, or- shrtlIowness of lot
slzC or shrtp(., or excepLionrtI LopogrtthicaI or other physical
con(i i t.1oils pecul iitr- Lo Lhe particular property, and that Lhe
kill nereeSS:t r}• lift r(Ish i p i s clue Lo such cond i t i ons , and not. the
ci rcunlsUtn(-- es of con(1i t.1ons t;eneritl I creitted by the
provisions of' the zoni.rig regulations in the neighborhood or
district, in which the property is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
a llant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of'
the plan.
Appeal ~..._
Ue►te �
t
Appel l a t
Vot.(.: Yes No S 1 gn
Use Reverse side for add t.ional t•indirig
J