The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-87-0000 - Supplemental - 1408 Spear StreetSOU( 3URLINGTON ZONING BOAi D 0-� )JUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; i�f (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is they fore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; E (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; r j( (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date �LCZ' Z� Appellant Vote: Yes 1 List findines helow: 1. 2. 3 No p Appeal # / X9-1 SOU-11 3URLINGTON ZONING BOA%D 0.� JJUSTu .NT ?indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations ie neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefpre necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ITT (3) That such unnecesr§ary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pr perty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appe Vote: List findings below: 2. 3: Muffs- Appeal #� Signlax- _ SOU' 3UELINGTON ZONING BOARD O!t DJUSTXEINT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Ej- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ET -- That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ID Appeal # Date_ /a ! 1? (y % Appellant �-e�tiy� �a�Qtti_zytirG�� N� {vrv�� 0 Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 1. N • � � J G ✓ e P i� SA 3 1J l.jp C -e' k'LJ ✓'I A,.4 1 (e 111, - 01 V SOUP 13UPLINGTON ZONING BOAT D 0( DJUSTML:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1:1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Appeal # S�b�ZyNs k I Date Appellant Vote: Yes No 1--1 Sign List findings below: 2. ?) -- i L -I i ') L I c I L— 2 C- w I N (—: r`%-) /vL_IGtfi3cizIs If& -)bCe (-,,J 6,C)6ib c- HIeLbiNc; Q ' 7`Q)y S -4 3 A21 Ge ��naA) 60AJ7-4Cr ��1 6 o�,.�� S rq u, 1Z SOUT( 3URLINGTON ZONING BOARD 011� )JUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446f of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; �a (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Rd (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; El (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1 ice (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan, Appeal # % J° 00 Date Appellant SPQ ��SK Vote: Yes Q No Sig � a) List findings below: 1. NaY /} uNIPJAE- L07' /" IY6 NF�E�Fh3a2kiaoD, CoN4F020,91AIC USE e5x/5Z�S SOUT( 3URLINGTON 'ZONING BOA?D OI'\ )JUSTME,N'r Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; -9 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant;, n (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # l �� Qy l %T/ cf r-) Date Appellant Vote: Yes No l-� Sign List findings below: SOU( BURLINGTON ZONING BOAi:D 0( .DJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in -he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (U�( (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (j/ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; IIIJ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0Z (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da t e /V - /�F- � 7 Appellant � p y4ynsj!�,,/Ll�/Lfy JL Vote: Yes No List findings below: 1.IAIJo T 2. ,�� 1�� Appeal # Sign