The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSD-78-0000 - Supplemental - 1350 Spear Streetl State of Vermont � y Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802)879-5656 Gary & Jane Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Subject: EXEMPT SUBDIVISION NUMBER HE-4-0219 LANDOWNER: Gary & Jane Farrell LOT SIZE: 3 acre LOCATION: Spear Street, South Burlington Based on the information in the above referenced application, the lot with an existing structure/dwelling on it is exempt from obtaining a subdivision permit from the Agency of Natural Resources prior to sale or lease as it appears to meet the criteria set forth in Chapter 1, Subchapter 3-Subdivisons, Section 1-304 of the Environmental Protection Rules. In issuing this opinion we have relied entirely on the information submitted to us, and the landowner creating this lot is responsible for its accuracy. Should it be determined in the future that the facts were not as stated, this letter will not prevent the Agency from taking appropriate enforcement action. Although not required, it is recommended that this letter be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. FOR THE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION n ene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary Dated 1998. c For the Record City of South Burlington Planning Commission & Selectboard Marc Wiener, Esq. SUGCESTED) IMOTION OF APPROVAL - HOPWOOD I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Gardner Bopwood for a 2 lot sub- division, as depicited on the plan of recor6, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The final plat shall be recorOK Within 90 days and shall slow the lot to be conveyed surveye6 in its entirety, and the "bpckland" with the best available information. 2. Parr tests shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits for the "backland". 5/23 / 8 -SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - HOPWOOD I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Gardner Hopwood for a 2 lot sub- division, as depicited on the plan of record,'subject to the following stipulations: 1. The final plat shall be recorded -within 90 days and shall show the lot to be conveyed surveyed in its entirety, and the "backland" with the best available information. 2. Perc tests shall be required prior-to'.the issuance of any building permits for d" ,hvtAlt •:i { M E M O R A N D U M To: South'Burlington Planning Commission From: Stephen Page, Planner Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items Date: 5/5/78 1. Zoning Board of Adjustment Agenda - enclosed. 2. Merlin - My understanding is that Bruce Houghton will attend. 3. Big Burger - I still feel that landscaping, parking, and internal circulation are inadequate - it is possible that the elimination of - Cs the drive-thru window could allow these aspects of the plans_ to be alleviated, although this suggestion has been rejected by the app- licant's attorney. The traffic data you requested is enclosed. - 4.= Hopwood Subdivision - A location map is enclosed. The application is complete; there are no substantive issues. 5. C.R. Wood Co. Additions - A location map is enclosed. Landscaping has-been oriented to the front yard. Circulation and parking are more than adequate. Access, provided by the two existing curb cuts, is also adequate. I do not feel the closing of the second curb cut is warranted at this time because this business is frequented by many trucks and heavy equipment and also because turning movements do not pose a major problem at this time. However, in the event the use were to change, or if the property were to be further developed, and as Williston Road traffic increases and development occurs across the street, then I feel 1 curb cut would be warranted. 6. -Tuff Kote addition - The proposed addition is to the rear of the existing building, toward the locust grove. Parking, circulation, and access are o.k. With regard to landscaping, you will see by the enclosed minutes on the original approval, there were no stipulations imposed regarding the locust trees. Apparently, these trees were diseased prior to any construction and are not now in good health. I suggest the diseased and dying trees be replaced with new plantings at the rear. In addition, because the initial planting plan has been bonded for, but not yet completed, I suggest that it be finished before a building permit for the addition is granted. U`rllll�, L-or, -riv" R-1 � f715TIzICi"yI� A' iZ. ��`-��CT 0 1 ,/-7.4A\� tit, h 51.,f 4 . JL, t � 3�r'1t,AIE f • Y�rt ;v ....��.�-'-y,•. .,�� :! - , t • t � y 1 i + J 1 t �•'+v M?�tr � �' - �'% 1L !4 f1 A' / ! + • Iti �'t. , r •q. "It [Y'7 ,•d ,j !i r; iy.ti, y"•,a r. ..t,,�`!v f,.,t. • ! . . � J ,;i {�I�ri r •, V { 'S ;�11 • (�'�5a��tt il� J} it r�i�11t'�it` n,�1 {e.- t, O � +� t'1 't' n ; �.� f,. ;r, rite l '�itf �`i`Y' ,'•;,{"x!'t t 't. fi' -^ 'r+ j`, t .. .. ! + t r a t �. _ ! �'+i.,� (ey lyt�i 1 1'� (i�r• - r •t � - , . r rtv t �1 .n �~�, � ltt i•rri r }` ,+ y• t Jti.. '+ .. t t +�+ �J 1 ��1vt��:jk�..��a a' �� t.•�r C-.,t'�+�r t� t;' J ti'. �. N y 1� t. �" C� .�! t � �v 'a. �� ' r HY�,p.i l�iJ. .A Y'��,YM'j`�(' { ti• . � ��T�•.' r�\ ,i + � ,; ° t,:l+ � f��'�w? ,j" ��+' �ry�I ,�s ,� y `t�• I � t . y, ,' + �' '21�t�Y�� !Fy ��t,�t�':• �+ flit � f ',! 1 ta.,c ,. .>r��' :rr r, ... .y , Y '.: t e S{u, t ,. .q\ e•J( d''"' .la. e 1 `j y, �} ,:. � ,. f_S f ` ,.. TI i,�IQ.•� r f a{ � h'�ff � Y�1 ��M1'li lil 1 .. 1 {,yrA IS + .}� , t .y ,'. r .. w�,S.!'to l�rlV�+ir. � rr S �•tift�� fy�}a�� ,`, + ... +t` ' �. ' ! ,♦ . •e ' y i+1 1 lgr.+<,l�tM •l:�i� r., r ' y ifTin �f { .r ar •. +. •,, !� , fr `+� ♦ .. i'. ft.r `. �4 s,••o .qyy { 4 4,tl i' ;,t, ,1t•tl, �`.A -,l �fM'iS' y .t. ti 1-' 00 r,� , 3 ! • '+' ' 4V r • t ' i y r x � � { \ r' ��..� •' I•�r �j, r��;'rt ! •` y 9 • +1' 1 �, v 1w. .e + Yr`.. tr < r+ ,�-l•�ffi�•p1�iay1•`'t{ .�� '!1 `�Ai.n ; 1,.tii1 ld... ,,, , 'r• ' + r. + ! I + r 43,:' 1 .tta, 1 r :, t•., '. �, {(,' 1J y�. 1+� ++ , •q9 a �."', f ;N r', 1 'P. i .' r �i`{�yrxt vil 'I»y A r� {t €, r _ r - * �y•�a.,j� I�N�,:r .t. r+' � 1� ,� Pat 4e � 1 r r .i J 1 � 1 '1 • 1 r +, per' w r ' f . '� ' h *� :.; ` J . r�!Mtti�' . + �t. d ,' S.r' , .,• .d v , 1 y,r '- ,�Y r Y t wv r !+t. • '+ t r '1 .l• z `..1, _' 1 � ,I`Y �i'1..y�� '' ; t'•k� t .l .+ '� �� •fG i w r 1 { t ; t titi i ti +' t♦ 1 It4' :.. y� _ 20(N.4 � !. t t i r •t r, �! 4'�i� ' y� i' t r t t p ';i ' v `f ` •+n. .„ r�•+�rir ''. J ' �,« r .[ }al 1 It^_'t( r, ''• p71�:* ` 1 •�� .<(_ , ♦' 4 t - +t jt '. ,` t .t ' ! '� r ,, r. +. .`!.. , •A ' /r , "nn,,,. f l.1 � w !t } a 5. / r r ,�` ,4 , µ .1 p : ! � t+' . vt ttiNl''tth Ihi k 't 1+ t`' r " !y •:1 :�,�; t ~' +1 tR t �+ � 1 ++t I - r , . / -+..( .i "� i t�. �M. r wi /F `e�+ i t ll:.l '� Y r �•.,r/ P+�. a Y �r 'r' � •1 �rO A}h t.'n `M ...,, „r�• .. f �.�,i try+ ',. i�'. +t' 1.,t - ,,f�(� r { •+ t, k?tt 4a •> 4..', r ,' t r,m `�� }+�! ..`t Y.�� is ,it toQt��`� }. , • d \��xt Y,� Oc SIMok Y�tti tt 4 -e ACVt�5 Oi= & = 6r .-- fir- Z� V,,ao.u- C�-- T— iIWM I OT5 -TO W rt-f!, c. a's orb A HOPWOOD My comments pertain to details which can be shown on the final plat or included as a condition of approval. BUSINESS PARK NORTH FINAL PLAT The primary issue remaining is the build -out rate of this sub- division relative to existing and anticipated traffic congbstion--at- the Kennedy Drive intersections with Kimball Ave. and Williston Rd. The conditions of preliminary plat approval included a provision that development be phased, with appropriate levels of service and degree of phasing to be decided at final plat review. The developer has suggested a timetable for development as follows: 1978 - 3 parcels; 1979 - 3 parcels; 1980 - 2 parcels; 1981 - 2 parcels. I concur with his contention that it is not aplropriate to apply a level of service standard for the following reasons: 1) we have not adopted a city-wide functional road:ay class- ification system. 2) the developer will be penalized by such a standare as through traffic from outside the community increases, as well as by traffic generated by projects subsequently aptroved by the Commission throughout South Burlington. 3) the four year phasing plan will give the cit-y, a firner baseline on which to program improvements to the two affected inter- sections. �) imposition of a level of service condition, only, without phasing, will force the subdivider to sell and develop the lots as soon as possible, before increasing congestion prevents him from completing the project. ' T.,o ether minor issues can be resolvee: first, there was a question on soils of lot 10, which can be all vizt c by removing unsuitable soils as necessary and replacing :fith good quality fill; secondly, the alignment of access to lots 9 and 10 (on ';illiston Road), with the National Guard Road has been shown. I co not believe it is feasible or practical to require alignment of these curb cuts with one another, given the layout of existing property lines, as i-rell as Bruce Houghton'; advice that this intersection may still be signallized, despite the offset. , pt � GL EYnOD See enclosed memo from T•;JS and myself, plus letter from George ..gal. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, may 23 , 197EI, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plat application of Gardner Hopwood for subdivision of a parcel of 27 acres into 2 lots, 3 acres and 24 acres in size. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the west by lands of J. Hanson, J. Reid, J, Cunningham, M Morselli, L. Norfleet, R. Gartftche, and Spear Street, on the north by lands of H. Boutilier and the University gf Vermont on the east by lands of J. Marvin, M. Scollins, T. Kleh, and I. Isham, and on the south by lands of A. Nowland, Copies of the application _ _ are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William B. Wessel, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission May 6, 1978 APT. -3 - � - $o►�u-tom.-. (�oZ- GP�s.� e l - � Z -�BBort- �V '`� . /ti nt--4 3 a �v ter ��--• (— t o Zl q ADo P ZtA- lt�o v cuic> 5 �.. 02. --11 RIM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT OR SUBDIVISION PERMIT 1. Applicant's Name, Address, and Phone Number 4��W*V-4�77- 2. Name, Address, and Phone Number of the Person Whom the Commission should contact regarding this Application Aea,6l�— 3. Nature of the Development or Subdivision 4. Location. of Development or Subdivision 5. High and Low Elevations of the Tract of Land involved with the Development or Subdivision 6. Address of each of the Applicant's Offices in Vermont 7. Applicant's Legal Interest in the Property (rei a Simple+, Option, Etc.) - 2 - 8. If the Applicant is not an individual, the Form, Date, and Place of Formation of the Applicant FORM: DATE: PLACE: 9. Estimated Cost, Exclusive of Land Cost of the Development (Applicant for a Subdivision Need Not hswer) r 10. Application for a Subdivision, the Number of Lots 11. What Restrictive Covenants are Planned for any Deed(s) to be issued? 12. Description of the Proposed Development of Subdivision A. Plans and Specifications: (1) Attach a detailed plat or plot plan of the proposed project drawn to scale, showing the location and dimensions of the entire tract. This plan should also show: all lots, streets, roads, water lines, sewage systems, drain systems, buildings, existing or intended. (2) In subdivisions where individual water and sewage facilities are intended, indicate the proposed location(s). (3) Show all easements, parks, playgrounds, parking areas, water courses, and other bodies of water, natural or artificial, existing or intended. (4) Include a contour man of the land involved drawn on a scale of 5 foot contour intervals. (5) Indicate on the plans the location and width of any easements for utilities, roads, etc., exist- ing or intended. Attach a written explanation of any such easements. -3- 13. What is the purpose of this Subdivision or Development and What is the intended use of the land after Subdivision or Development? 14. Describe the Site of the Proposed Development or Subdivis- ion including information, if available, on Soils, Streams or Other bodies of Water, Bedrocks, Etc. 15. Acreage: [:IF Number of acres owned, or in which you have a legal interest B. Number of acres in this project C. Number of acres previously developed D. When do you anticipate beginning the project E. When will this development or subdivision be completed 16. Water System: A. What type of water system is to be provided, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, municipal system, etc. B. Where is the nearest municipal water system and is it available and feasible to use it? i j • Scwage L_St ii:: A. What type of sewage disposal system is to be provided or intended, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, or municipal system? B. Where is the nearest community sewage system and is it available and feasible to use it? C. If the sewage system is other than a community, municipal, or individual lot septic tank and leaching field' include competent professional engineering evidence that it will perform satisfactorily. 18. Adjacent Property: A. List below the names and addresses of adjacent property owners. B. What is the adjacent property used for at present? A1;YAVeWr ,44 C. What is the property? ure usage intended for the adjacent 19. Zoning: A. Which' District or Districts is the proposed site with- in according to the official zoning map of the City? DATE S IGNAT UPE „s ey jj. t • s� - {AI ( Mj� ol 51 }44, ff •4 hso' y Gi i k,j ,1 4 !✓ Al 1 L �. l Q .� Sr. IL