Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH 2 - Supplemental - 1302 1340 1350 1404 1406 Spear Street
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION 41 4- i2 "IT , L na PAvsLiPATH 2,/ /\/"1 / 1 i L] f •sc«LINs \_) � �kT l rJ I�yleo-oozlc J \ /\. / A_ �./��� — / �,�' \/� I OPE \ _.aBABowsXl a L1Bm I \� \ .. (\ s CONCRETE sIDEWALK I / — �...—. / r- /rovmHD` _ IE1'--=PmrtdL[ n1 s�PEat �O , I ndz7i I I 1]2NANg' . ~--BORIYAJANN 1 �, �p 111 1]I2�0021 L61 50 'J-- T) \E_ \ / ., I _, � i/ • ,1 LOT48 ,' , � /�/�\41 �� / �j j �r� � `—�� 1>% \` sir D - • ) / �� I I l ` J II 9 1 1 TARRANT �L Fil j • L . _ f1S 1,u4 I ------ D. MLIHR / 1 I1r, ♦ h �_ �/\ /I �/ f �'NI �Y� L,Ia o. YOUNGl _ \> / %� / ' �� ♦ /15NO40i 1640411401Tr is Lm- J) 11j1 111\\ It, 1 I I i•a i�1si - \\ (�/ SpS--'- /1'1`/'I h_- In-I-�/ �I \-- -�n�/J ' ►lllj/i�l� / \ / uv E- /� I\ I „ / ill f / PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED NIGHT OF -WAY ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER V EDGE OF WETLAND TREEUNE EXISTING CONTOUR l GRAPHIC SCALE too o so 100 200 40D 1 1rcN • 100 B. 18 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS (3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES SHEETINDEX 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 1C CONSTRUCTION PHASING 1L STREET LIGHTING PLAN 1S SIGNS B PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE & UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE 8 UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE 8 UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE 5 PROFILE - ELM STREET 6 PROFILE -VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE & HALCYON LANE 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - STREETS 11 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - SEWER & STORM 12 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - WATER 13 SEWER PUMP STATION 14 DETAILS& SPECIFICATIONS -EPSC 15 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS- STORM PONDS 16 SPEAR STREET TURN LANE PL1 PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT LANDOWNER' GAR Y N. FARRELL 4 13°0 SPEAR, LLC 4 SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 13W SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT W03 APPLICANT', THE SNYDER GROUP, INC. 407E SHELBURNE ROAD. SUITE B SHELBURNE.VT0s482 LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. 1� SOILS MAP KEY Cr 901E MAPPINGUNIT HSG COVINGTON SILTY CLAY 0 049 N.T.S. GM:4 GBB GEORGIA STONY LOAM C 0.2a U LNINGSTON CLAY D 0a9 MIIL NASSENA STONY SILT LOAM C 0.20 VFB VERGENNES CLAY D 049 TONING DATA AX MAR PARCEL NUMBER -1840-1310 PROJECTPARCELAREA 25,MACRES 20NING DISTRICT- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT- NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL - NR OVERLAY DISTRICTS WATERSHEDPROTECTION BUFFER DENSITY.. BASE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY • 31 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 1.2 UNITSIACRE • 31.1 UNITS AVERAGE ALLOWABLE DENSITY • 103 UNITS M 93 ACRES X 4 UNITSIACRE • —7 UNITS PROPOSED DENSITY • 48 UNITS NOTES: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE OVERALL SITE UYOUTOF THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2, SEE OTHER PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION `J `� (! •-I,\ �� �\ ``l'_\ `J I x��� it .. i1V PAVEDPATH �'., (_„^.,-. •--. (\ TYPICAL 3 UNIT \ / ,- I _ TOWNHOUSE /'- / "" -- j.�..,.. SPACE6PEAR Q ,...PM'O. NA6LE AT l TYPICAL SINGLE FAM LV ' 1PP VEb'PATR � CARRIAGE HONE / •PFED WATERMAIN COTJ-NECn7TO SWIFT 6TREET 1 ! I / J / r / ( J Y EXISTING HOUSED r GARAGETOBE{EMO D G I PHASE 7 \\ MMa rre al�Irr DRIVE r i€ I CIASB2 WETLAND 1 u OF - OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR C� PUBLIC OPEN SPACE �\ (FUTURE PARK) �Y r IST,G GARq�E \ 1 I LJ EXISTING TO REMAINOUSI ,�� \J� -.,+ -.,.,\ - .. _ - �ii' ``'.....�,_� J - ,- --' Il 1\\•,=i/I-T.r. '.. I �I\ t\ :�•�,,, c>SP I I I 1 BARBTREET / U}j /jIL"J-_I_'_�, (� bItl +jI J\ \ /r/ I 1 \�J�v �Y1 ,._.� _ i'�,F`�ll._j .-�\7"..../._I_.-_ �/ It/( "j 1 (i. (/`ICI I / �• ��• GRAPAIC SCALE LEGEND PROJECTBOUNDARV PROPOSED RIGHT-0E-WAY ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v V EDGE OF WETLAND TREELINE EXISTING CONTOUR ProvidenceY2 MicroCore'—Medium Housing PROV _ FEATURES' — • IxCCWaIHeq ♦ 0-10V OmmKq rWq- • Rlat'.. bll.gla,I-old"'maw, • h/egm—g .rT>'XaVign • TR nliN Iv.v ana custarl LreSNelp^^Ne axrwAlon OIX t4m • 13 %endar0 pom]ar coat pnlNxro • aaooK 4000N, 6owKccr SPECIFICATIONS a •'M 6mm �1 A :Jlanetor. 18 2" 7 4T6 mm HegN. Si.S!f61O mm. W.Q.. 2A IM EPa. 0g6 W RNY,'. GS 3i FTBxm• ORDERINGINFORMATION MODEL A e 5 6 T {{II--IFI PHOV ._l.-..._........ --E:' II. j� � ....... .I__I �..._I.....................—._.............. .,.,,[..�„� � LipnFIE- CfT V-01— W. O,n— m—eg r. l.!(itfI ENGIAE 5 OPTIONS >. MOUNTING AffiSfErMt. fte'+tAw �Yngf� SPK (lJAt9'1M,yW,.I 5lenderdca✓gwrorn sY(M t+era4'plAr4w; T2 BP^a (.6tW 1ailbd ka..J Bcp Pa'aarre)cdar�mN. 32L LDL @!pWfA#4xdkns7 W&,LNivdluMm Tb,32LED OL.R'CW:NYAasi HSS.Ohoe lwljtrt4»@ WMA1 WMA% WM Af7 WMAR.1 R32L.ED TR,a!,iED K. (iAXEp¢?IAYLr 4 EPA-C(F uCa4arW,4) W'MA66 2.4E.Maoot III WMAr'2U 2 COLGH TFM(tFWI'UHE WA-T'rfv-"A*'.w) TRA6U4 SLAT /� l:Y 6K FT23 L7ex Ae.•A 21?•007 n) �SS1g0wA MT—) TRA6LI-4 TRA56 ELA12 SLAgJ-4 I'RA66 5 SLAW 0. DRIVE CURRENT 6, CO TRCL TRA56 SLA2:U-0 TCA 460 pOrt.O!%dt¢NaIVBMdaVbCM!XmPWaN) T=" SLA2: -6 CA .PYdMff(frJdKb79iNbmA TRA513 ,oN VICOLOR SCA ($ara6r CnNnA PrpoammKAp1 poM rrn.. In &x I&I, VBIJ UWd Nw PA flNEi er'reawrYH auakgato uroa0p 5ecuPsrrPY <hVxn CRT LJM MAl 110 Xmnmtm tle;ectim for aAdcor appkaIore meaUlO Cen,_,T0e2411--p-gec [Met AD5 f11111 U.v4(C— MG "W"G" DWI— AGN AP07uebfbn WMordon't; inkllYMlttNl, uiuL%WT:IEHLOF.f. IT ¢dM4m LQ Volr'q WIDE Ah ft d&— RAL A—Crdm MDe SNnNNea5d CUSTOM••cw°wR wY A Ec IAM. AE4 LIGH '- POta. Ies±a. m.WpwaN.nel TYPE ® ✓361BN GYprgyrX g.Pt9 pw 21F NOT_5 W I 1 1 Shakespeare ROUND TAPERED COMPOSITE LIGHT POLE ANCHOR BASE INSTALLATION AO -SERIES_ Post top pole SHAKESPEARE AO -SERIES AVCHOR BASE POLES Mounlrg he ghts to 251ea Smooth sem'-amaoEl or nature) finish 3 standeM and 5 sped archltaUunl colors available High pad.-.- UV and weather -resistant TIC—oled recn lyatlm Wdh an adidiliional pigmenled polyureltane coaDlg. T on top or Drilled and Capped SXendaN 2-112" q 5-hand We located 10" above Bede Poly are mdWidualh Ident'Bed WIM a permanent embossed tag located 9" hom lip. Sleeve[ individually for shi—It LOhtweght, easy to Install, saves money ORDERING INFORMATION A O 93 - 01 S 1 (*) �T� T TT T 1 8 9 FINISH BEIADDE➢ •eEM1-�tOoT. ¢,ITEgNAL N •NgiUPAL UEE s1ANOARe [GLOB EaNM caoRs Ot a•Xd.>E'T¢XOX •BLAON BROWN =d.aiE'%aM"TFNpI Z.OpAY N•MOM aq¢!H IN•CAPFlO DARN BRONZE e•9EVFp • CULT MCT1aP' >. yaalE OP'nONB e•p1aN GREEN �TRIEF Ll LI lip /f\ i —/'! Ate.•_./��/ _ �". -.+-. _/ r\ � ` _ _ — l ICA I EF,T LIGHT I—�RST/Z -Tr ' I i- I u - _ ii T I I —� it ��/---•� — THE ter\ 1 /T •' 1� 11.`'� / II 1 i ._../� \ r l ���� � I. ! `^, / /^I I11i / // ,. _./ �-• •'^"�^ ` \ of -zeta ,- / ONLY O SKE / O PREI I FINA NOTES 1. THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON STANDARDS FOR RESIOENTIPL STREETLIGHT. LUMINAIRES, POLES, AND PHOTOSENSORS. 2. LIGHT POLE BASES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WRANS STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING T-133 (LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAILS) 3. THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION DESIGN IS TO BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS. 4. SEEOTHER SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE AND UTILITY DESIGN INFORMATION. GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 400 (In f") 1 inch =100 N. Z .... _ � \ -, ,— ..... _� t __••�_ .^' . / i � _ ... LOT 5 EE I l pSrE�E PEAR STfiEET TURN LANE FOR REL TEDSIGNAGE LEGEND /O> BOLA RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON WITH SIGNS) STOP SIGN (SEE INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAIL) OCHEVRON SIGN(W11. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OCORNER WARNING SIGN (W1-1, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) © PEDESTRIAN 20.E SIGN I—1.2, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) © PATH ENDS SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) © NO PARKING SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) ® NO PARKING (WITH ARROW) SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OPEDESTRIAN CROSSING IWII1. W131P, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OWETLAND INTERPRETIVE BIG. (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) GRAPHIC SCALE I \/ I \ ! 1 j , VALE DRIVE I G ^ ENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE FROM EXISTINGCUPTO INTERSECTION. MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BVI _ CITY PRIOR TO CONON STRUCTION. LOT 51 TYPICAL 4• WIDE WHITE STRIPES FOR PTIRKING SPACES s _ _ CL! \ "—.,•'— 1 ._._� LOT 52 1 SIREEt-� " + I PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (FUTURE PARK) I / 48 VN \ ; h l l ,,--Tn F ` I -" S9�RSrR� 17, / THE INTERPRETIVE SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE ON A PEDESTAL MOUNT BASE. THE SIGN POST AND ALL MOUNDNG HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. THE SIGN POST SHALL BE SET IN A CONCRETE BASE HAVING A MINIMIM DIAMETER OF 10INCHES AND EXTENDING TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE. THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE EXTERIOR GRADE SOLID PHENOLIC RESIN, WHICH IS RESISTANT TO ULTRAVIOLET (UV) RADIATION DETERIORATION AD GRAFFITHPROOF THE EMBEDDED GRAPHIC PANELS SHALL HAVE DIGITALLY PRINTED SUBSURFACE IMAGES FUSED INTO A SINGLE PANEL AND UNDER THE EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE. THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE WEATHER TIGHT. THE SIGN PANEL GRAPHICS SHALL BE 24 INCHES BY 3S INCHES. WETLAND INTERPRETIVE SIGN NTS Bo STOP B'TO —12 GAUGE 2•SQUARE STEEL GROUND SIGN POST WITH ANCHOR DOUBLE 4" YELLOW CENTER LINE, TYPE I MARKINGS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY STOP SIGN N.T.S. STOP SIGN, 2'4OFF FACE OF CURB 2: b.CONCRETE CURB I d` SIDEWALK 12• WHITE STOP BARTOBE .� LOCATED 15BACK FROM EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY OR 4 FT BEHIND CROSS WALK INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTIONDETAIL NTS PATH SEE PLAN FOR SIGN LOCATIONS A SIT`X 30• ENDS W12 TYPICAL PATHENDS SIGN NTS TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN ZONE SIGN NTS NO NO NO PARKING PARKING PARKING ANY ANY e•x2a• Wl-1(L TIME TIME ANY W'd Wi-1 (LTBRT) TIME INSTALL 2 SIGNS TOTAL 15 GN FACING SOUTH 12' X 1B• - i SIGN FACING WEST TYPICAL PATH ENDS SIGN NTS TYPICAL CORNER SIGNS NTS GENERAL NOTES: 1. NEWPAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TOP COURSE PAVEMENT SHALL BE DURABLE AND 90LAR PANEL (ORIENT TO FACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 VT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SOUTH) WITH INTEGRATED RRFB SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTROLLER AND RADIO TRASMITTE ANTENNA 2. TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON BASE PAVEMENT MAY BE PAINT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON T SQUARE STEEL POSTS WITH ANCHORS. d. ALLSIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM? MET CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AND FINISH GRADE. XEX3FFYG W11 2 �- PEDESTRMN CROSSING SIGNS (Be) —� BI-DIRECTIONAL RECTANGULAR RAID FLASHING BEACONS �� `18"X30"FYG W18-TP� ARROW PLAQUES (B-B) PEDESTAL SIGNAL POLE J (4- DIA. STD. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, PAINTED BLACKI PESHBUTTONASSEMBLYS J BASE MOUNTED FLUSH B" X 12" R10.25 PEDESTRIAN SIGN WITH SIDEWALK REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING SEE VTRAS STD. DETAIL E-170 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW THE RECTANGULAR RAID FLASHING BEACON MANUFACTURER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER AND CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SOLAR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONDETAIL NTS / SPIT RAIL FTYPICALROCKBORROW SEWER PUMPS I I I / WITH WIRE MESH THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY STATION I 1 a MIN. 12'WIDE GATE FOR OUTLET POOL \ 2 / SE�SHEET4 ) I I1 ACCESS TO POND INLET / BOTTOM=3]8.00 GRATE=33.00 p IGSAFE'PRIOR T(ANV EXCAVATION METERS LOCATION WITH w r- 4'X12'OPENING=38400 SPLIT IL FENCE CONFIRM LOCATION WITH CITY p \ BEE SHEET I3 FOR SEWER Z S'ORFICE=382.85 TYPICAL STONE 18'PE WITH E.B. WI WIRE MESH VALVERT \ PUMP STATK)N DESIGN DETAILS _RE MOVEEXISTINGGRAVEL / 380 -- ----___ _ 18'OUT=33.60 STORM OUTFACE INV 38140 I r DRIVE AND REPLACE WITH / 381 / 1 a WIDE GRAVEL ACCESS DR; TOPSOIL, SEED BMULCH / / (TW THICK CRUSH GRAVEL) EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK EXISTINGHOUSE AND GARAGE TO BE REMOVED I �' ' 'ag s7ORMWAreTtroNI I NORMAL WATER=3 85 ,'r ' ,` J t8' PE -- ",; _ B' SDR 36,P IC FDt _ _ _ _ - - O W / TO TINGWATERSERVICE BOTTOM POND=38f0 3 FDMH/ I CO DINATVEO / ' 15'PE WITH E.S. BPI W = / " ' CB#11 w u,, \qF COORDINATE WITH h.. INV=33.]0 } I _ _ HO -N l� B#10 1�I - ' sT2 - - - - - e•sDR 3s we seB I 11 ICI 1 / WATER DEPARTMENT \ C2WETLAND O� 'WIDE GATE R, I i. / I ' - lAn24'PE WITHES 1\ I 3B4 FOR POND A S \ SM #5 STONE SPILLWAY '� r --- F1E=3B1.5 CBX28 �{ INV=3B1.25 / 7 j 31 Z lap m{W \ / / I } } ,zj, BTORMWATER PoND ` .........._ .__ ._ p \\ / / I J / ; { BOTTOM PONDR 381.0 14WI S 5 s a n0 } \ J SPILLWAY-38400 - BYA </ i 1 /� i I 1 21 I OUTLETPOOL //�-1 �•\ I/dO 1 I STONE SPILLWAY BOTTOM= �m]3 ELEV = 9840 Q n MIN.1 IDE DATE ` \ ; FOR pON ACCESS 1 k, ( I/ \\ I OUTLET STRUC URE I 15' PE WITH E.S. 1 STA- 21+00 I x I - - / 9oD, p GRATE=3399 INV-382.00 CH LINE I 46 I 1 /.i 1 1rxz4-wEIR= 4.sD II„MAT Y �, / `/ �`���_ 1A"PE WITH / \t 1 ` SO 3� / 1 \\ r 1.V OUT =381W 1 INV-`83.00 2 1V WIDE GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE �� RJ5 I / \ \ / I I \ / I 7 I 1 47 18' THICK CRUSHED GRAVEL) ry' / \ J ` FFE=39 /; ' j � / I I S� FORE W BFE=3 2 / UD CLEA OUT 382.� O / 44 I o I / I- Y _} Bo oM-3]B.Bo INV=33 FFE=393.5 �\ i N I BFE-3850 �/ 390 / \ � CLASS WETLAND 11I I B 1-_. 1 NEW STREET UGHi \/ / \\]RAH ^ 9 MRz6 PVC FM �i{' _ \\ 42 i� I l A. PE WIIE.S. 'd 7p O /� j I/1V=33. L 21�5211 I +a _ 3 45 --- v / �\ 0 PAVED ATH 13 TAT. NK p1\ /�. + BFE.3 20 / \/ 11 CNO DEFINED UDCLEANOUT - INV=3 .10 CBpAt 1$PE \_ 3__-_. \ FE_ 0 / 11 I 1I I II _3 1 m I%I i 10 PAVED PATH // 43 BFE-300. \ 1 \ ' ItIV=331T1I1 EIS. I 314 ----" FB09MH STREET LIGHT JUT TO POND INLETS 11 #12 I I\ GATE FOR 18.00 SMH' B• / C � 15'P r 300 - o u [ /! '^ � �A` / \�• _ FM� - � I I T - 1T*iW � --- I,i 1 \ FFE•394.0 1 �s �/ � FULL LENGTH OF PIPE WITH END �,..J � 3 CAP GATE AND THIRUST BLOCK PI PAST + \ ` \ FC� IN 382 399 B#3A \ ` ce p5. s H#2 g _ _ s4R3s Pvc:- 15�W_ - 15 W IDE UTILITY EAS MENT T(S• NL A IE V � HOMEOWNERS A950CWTION r '� D I •--.� W / / •--} 8_CL51 DIw R - 1 COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW I - 'IF• P "1 % I I 1 w m I 4 I e'SDR35 BEWEfL,TYP \ - DRIVEWAY TO EXISTING HOUSE WITH '; PCO \ 1 S N FIFE = 3 ] / HOMEOWNER. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF i18 ' 3K' TYPE'K' COPPER WATER S BFE = 5 2 GRAVEL SUBBASE AND 2.5"TYPE III PAVEMENT ' \ 1 9 I I 1 � � i sERVICEBCURBBTOP, TYP. � CBI 1•PE f r_ ! II � �\\ I'll /� I '$ I i ( " / I I 24'PEWITHEAI / I 33 cS W % / 1 I B I 1 \\\ •I'lll INv.33sD 132 W I I I I l I N r I FE' 28' 2 II 11 r � l� ,-• .. � 10 � p F 393.0 op I 4 1 -\ 11 \\,`,1 I 1 BFE•3B4.5 I _ D PT= 2 DMH FOMH 1 \4 r�D• BT Q p)/ / \ 1 I I p4 i I I 4 , , , , / 1 ] 1 �+ CLAS32 WETIAN � D 1 • FF I � 11 � I _ I (I ' � 5 392 Lk^ i i i 5 II II I o RIFE=3856 1 J 1 v ' EXIST BMH \ / BUFF I i 'i NEWII942\\\ 1 1 I NEW 4'IN=3849i Y � ?�- \ 1 8" IN = 3848] /_v/ '}\ 1 "�tl-" I \ ,Q$$F8 \ I I \ W I ) 8"IN •3843 V 11 'll, :1 �:1I\ ( I J� B e'OUT=344 ] / I W \ I 1 FFE=396.0 ) + </ EXIST. HOUSE ;I STA.24 00 40 �IN B I \ \ \ \ •It i � a� BFE•385.5 ,MATCH LINE FFE = 393.80 1 SEE SHEET 3 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES I BFE CATCH BASIN DATA SEWER MANHOLE DATA Ca "I CB#5 CB#10 SMH#1 SMH#4 STA. 10+87, 12' LT. STA. 13+80, 12' RT. STA. 20«15, 12' RT. STA. 11+50, CL STA. 15+50. CL �` 1 tl 0 6 RIM = 388.30 ' O I ' I 1 1 TLAHD 1 71 I I I RIM RIM RIM RIM \ 50'WE Pl \ I a MH#7 I FFE=395$5 / I \ \ \ RCN I BFE=38B.0 (2)6"UD IN=384.80 6"UD IN-385.35 6'UD IN=383.25 6^IN=383.28 WIN =381.08 39 m 15" IN = 384.70 6" UD OUT = 386.35 15" IN = 383.05 8" OUT = 383.18 8" OUT = 380.98 I 35 I I 1 POW 15' OUT = 384.65 SMH #2 SMH #5 s 15" IN = 385.15 15" OUT = 383.00 \ FFErgg3 eD \ I s '� W I 15" OU7 = 385.10 D ! n aBFE = 3Bs 3, \ \ CB # 2 CB # 11 STA. 14+00, CL STA. 20+33.14, CIL I y STA. 10«87, 12' RT. C8 # 8 STA. 20+15, 12' L7. RIM = 389.82 RIM = 387.84 1 s 1\ I \ \ \ 1 / 1 30 RIM = 388.30 STA. 5D+50, 11' RT. RIM = 387.25 (2) 8' IN = 381.93 6" IN = 378.51 N m 1 - � � I 11 1 \ 1\ 1\ la I BFE=385.5 1 W (2) 6' UD IN = 384.95 RIM = 0,50, 8" UD IN = 383.25 8" OUT = 381.83 8" OUT = 378.41 � W � J \ 1$R, 1 I FDCO REVISIONS (SEE BELOW, LEFT) 15" IN = 384.95 5" UD IN = 385.60 15" OUT = 383.25 1 L- 1 o N I \ lw-m.B0 \ , I 1 I 15' OUT = 384,90 6" UD OUT = 386.10 SMH #3 SMH 1W £ o L- y8 \ 1 y 15" IN = 385.40 CB # 12 STA. 53+00, CL STA. 22+28.34, CL I 1 S=SHEET THESE PLANS WITH LATEST �'/190N5 $HOUl9 1 OF CB#2A `I IA ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS RIM = 388.00 15" OUT = 385.35 STA. 22+10, 12' LT. RIM = 391.66 STA. 18«24.48 CL RIM=389.20 6'IN=384.18 RIM =389.78r s \m ��- _ \ j �� I� SKETCH/CONCEPT 15"OUT=385.10 CB#7 6"UD IN= 8"OUT =384.08 8"IN(S)=380.28 92,'` 1 _ FDA- _ / I \ISTORMWATEI MAINAGEMENT&GRADING GRADING PRELIMINARY CB # 3 STA. 50+50, 1 V LT. 8" UD OUT = 8" IN (W) = 379,61 - THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT. THIS M FINAL RIM-389.10 18"IN=383.65 8"OUT=379.51 1 `�$ s PERMIT REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND RECORD DRAWING STA. 12+17, 12'LT. \ RIM = 391.05 6" UD IN = 386.60 24" OUT = 383.60 i �''� \ ROOFTOP GUTTERS IF INSTALLED COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP (2)8"UD OUT=387.05 6'UD OUT=388.10 FOUNDATION DRAIN MANHOLE DATA I •�,� FE:385.8 .O ( ) proj. no. I _� 36 DISCONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEE715. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION SPEAR MEADOWS 1400E 15" OU7 = 385.60 CB # 13 (3) 15' IN = 384.05 FDMH #4 FDMH #7 '"T w FFE=39a eo DETAIL APPLIES TO THE REAR HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR 15" OUT = 364.00 STA. 22+75, 12' R7. \ 1 \ survey RIM = 392.5 RIM - 387.0 m BFE=Jee.a UNITS 23-26, 28-31 g 3337. CB#8 RIM=389.85 8"IWOUT=383.25 (26"IN=382.30 I ( ARESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 1 SNOW STORAGE: Cg . 12 STA 16+64, 12' RT. 6' UD IN = 8"OUT = 382.30 I 1 I I ` SPEAR STREET &VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design RIM = 388 00 6' UD OUT � SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: STA. 12+49.4. RT. FDMH 8 / 1 I l - ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE ABR 15' OUi = 384.30 IW UD IN = 384.00 18" O = = 384. RIM = 385.75 FDMH #8 J 8 s H 3 I SIDEWALKIPATH AND CURB drawn 15"OUT=363.75 18"OUT-384.00 8"IWOUT=381.80 RIM=389.0 \ \ SITE PLAN & \ - 1 s 'e ! - IN THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE ABR CB #4 FDMH #6 6'• IN/OUT = 384.20 �. \ 37 \ GRAPHIC SCALE checked STA.13+80, 12'LT. CB#9 CB#25 RIM =386.0 FDMH #9 v _ Y 1 RIM=389.35 STA. 16+64,12'LT. RIM=387.50 6'INIOUT=383.20 RIM=388.1 - p.. �g \\3,' II 30 0 15 30 BO 120 UTILITIES -NORTH ae 6"UDIN=385.35 RIM=388.00 15"IN=38333 6"IN/OU7=382.53 '� �y� 1 8" UD OUT = 386.35 (2)6" UD IN = 384.00 15" OUT = 383.28 EXISTING HOUSE AND _ l W 1 I \ 06-06-16 15" IN = 384.90 15" IN = 363.56 GARAGE TO BE REMOVED " \ \ STORM STRUCTURE DATA �/ / II I L} On feet) scale 15" OUT = 384.85 15' OUT = 383.50 CB # 26 / AS NOTED RIM = 387.5. STORM TANK #1 TEMPORARY PAVED I \ LAMOUREUX & DIInc. N TURN -AROUND / 1 Ot-24.18 REVISE SPEAR MEADOW ROAD TO ELM STREET ABR ConsBlNn En 15" IN = 383820 GRATE NORTH = 392.2 OBE �- \ g gin0ers, Inc. "1\ \ 14Morse Drive hl. no. 15"OUT = 382.75 GRATE SOUTH = 392.1 _ _ / '\ I oe-oea] DEL SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE VALE DR ABR Essex Junc[i00, VT 05452 15" IN = 383.88 044W-17 REVISE POND WEST INLET GRADING. STORM TANK PER CITY ABR Tel: 802-878-4450 n 15"OUT=383.83 M9�'-/ / - _ �\ •, \ n i 03-13-17 REVISE STORM POND WEST. PIPING, ACCESS, ADDSNOWST. ABR SNOW STORAGE: /•/ _ I / \ 1� •\ _ / \ / / 1,-/-400 /- •/ SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE I n \ ` \ - J ENI�O SIDEWALK/PATH AND CURB/v ) // `/ '\\ (--�\ CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEDPATH SEE SHEET4 ... IN THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE / / `/ Y \402 IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ON LOT 54- `j/ / YY lhit REMOVE TREES FOR I CONSTRUCTION OF PAVED PATH THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ( ^ _ _ _ _ .- - n 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION -. / - - �- _ 1`"/ \\\/ \-400^ / _ ��W,vED PATH r -�aa,• PROPOSED PAVED PAJHtl(SEMENT \ \ �" \ \ / ^ -- - - - A •S - 390' ._ - - 10'ry Po 3JE IZ1� / \ TO CITY OF SOUTH SU�RL(INOTON.29S BRANCHES ON EXISTING TREES SHALL SIDELINE OF EASEMENT SHALL BE TRIMMED TO A MIGHT OF IO FEET WEST OF CONSTRUCTED PATH \ ALONG THE NEW PAVED PATH 3� ..._.. .._ _ ._- END CURB _ MMM 'SS' py PS /� 'Sm Q•p -,_p20 __/ \ 59 / LOT 53-_'\ _396- - - _. _. . S '>�no _ PROPOSED IY WIDE SIDEWALK 'Y -``_- / ` I( \\-'394--� 21 10' PAVED PPPATH,AS 9 y T _ ..._EBlIEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTHI// A �' T •� .. RC1NGTON r / 12 - W FFE=399.2 20 10 I BFE=3B9.] I -_3 "Y� / 13 - BE=3B90 3 CB 425/ CB - ,,_. ^ `` `•--3- TYPICAL 3H-TVPE BFE•3W2 � �. ES COPPE ATER 1 ♦ / 14 386.p BFE•3$y I .. SERVICCURBSTOP 1 / FF / •0 19 /' :.. BFE�0Sg 8 1 _- -FD- - FDMH TYPICAL W'TYPEK I FFE=388A � I I � ORVICEacuResr /. \I I BFE=38T.3 I 11} • ♦-_FOJ_--- - _ rC WATE _ N 6 I FFE-T962 1 _ 392--- FFE=3B5.5 BFE•386.] I BFE=308.0 I I -F FDMH �n 96" _� •' - 396 /�a n -` � �F� x 6 „y5•CONCREiE 310Ew�K t2• L52 DI WATER " 3� 29' SMN °j oo - L 1 p 16 17 18 I FFE.39675 Q BFE=3B8.25 117 d 00 "1" "-"" FO- 6•-SOISTVLI- 7q 3 381 -�'R35 WC vAL \ I I • "P� �' q /y / 1 -FD- - - ti - _ SMH x6 3 A. $ 27 8' B• I TYP. 8• SDR35 I 1 QT CB p19 PVC SEWER � \ - =F z " UJI -N 6 SDR35 PVCl SMH x7 _ f - 2 396--_____ _ � � \ '4- W 12•C15201WA / � 5$ � ♦ / =Z _ cAssz WE LAND �J ,IyM1 I ; _ -/ �` + I •' I 22 I n'^ S SMH b10 3 32.03 .- ' 8 / - I 27 FFE=359.00 / N V1 3 - - J + 8'SOR35 PVC BFE=3B9.5 "• q5. 7Q • l ; ___.- _ __..__ / I fFE•387.7 I SEWER, TYP. 24 I ' + / I BFE • 3882 I FFE • 396.70 390 _ _ � 3a i 29/ FFE •39870 39BFE=389.2 DEPRESSED CU FFE-AS57 BFE•389.2 BF%•388I -- 394 'l23 26 / FFE=39S.0 //30 ____ - 3Y2 O I / � � \ / •;/ ,�' / \ SEES HEET 2 I BFE=3B$5 ` - 39D---t - - ,-----1` ---eD - = _ _ . \ _ �.gg0^' LOTsz NOTES; 6" SDR35 PVC SEWER, TYP. / • 'O B' D 3 P PUBLIC OPEN SPACE y= $ M1 VSe -Fp- - / 1. COORDINATE THE HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE WATER, SEWER. AND FOOTING DRAIN 2p -� SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO EACH BUILDING WITH THE OWNER AND ARCHITECTURAL V 392 1 -y=-- 'a WIDE STABILIZED TURF PLANS. J FDCO IN-387.9 PATH TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 390 ---- / (SEECROBSCOLINTRYPATH 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE ELEVATIONS OF THE SEWER AND FOOTING DRAIN CIROGS MOTION) BERVICESFROMTHEMCNITECTIMALPU-5 ILBECOMPAREDTOTHEELEVAN OF THE COLLECTION MAINS AND SERVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. REPORT ANY I o-FD- -388_DISCREPANCIES TO E ENGINEER. �.��-,� .o. TH I FOUR PVC FDl L - _ - _ � - T END DEFINED CHANNEL 3. COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF THE SIDEWALK ENTRANCES TO EACH BUILDING WITH THE g lxB OWNER. UNLESS STEPS ARE PROPOSED, THE MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ANY SIDEWALK IS 8%. _V,51 -IPI- _ - - "'"- ' SLOPES GREATER THAN 5%MAY REOUIRE A HAND RAIL. 4. DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE END OF ALL SIDEWALK AND -, •- - - - - - - _ _• _ - CLASS WETLAND CONCRETE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR • • WARNING PLATES SHALL BE •P DETECTABLE CAST IRON. FOR PAVED PATHS A SEGMENT OFLATES. _ _ V STREAM CHANNEL _ � I _, -,. - - INSTALLATION OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STUBS BEYOND PHASE LIMITS FOR FUTURE EXTENSION INTO OTHER PHASES (SEWER, WATER, STORM, UD, ETC.). ACROSS 10'OSS BDAETLLAND AND I( 6. COORDINATE UTILITY MANS AND SERVICES WITH THE DEVELOPER AND UTILITY COMPANY. ' W / 7. NEW STREET LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES SHALL CONFORM WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS CJ1SS 2 / STANDARDS. SEWER MANHOLE DATA CATCH BASIN DATA / 1D18-17 REVISED WATERMAIN ALONG VALE TO IO"CL52 DI NOS SMH #7 SMH #10 08.0617 DEL SW SOUTH SIDE VALE DR, 10 PATH & BOARDWALK ABR CS # 14 CS # 17 CB # 20 CB # 25 4{ BCAROM iCONCRETE STA. 24+50, CL STA. 3i+50, CL STA. 25+Op, 12' RT. STA. 2fi+78.75, 12' LT. RIM • 383.70 STA. 3a+so, lz• Lr. LEGEND I 1 I�� ABUTMENT 6 BACKWALL o3-1117 PATH TO BOARDWALK THRU WETLAND IN OS, ADD SNOW ST ABR RIM=392.00 RIM =393AO RIM =392.10 RIM =393.90 12"OUT = 389 .50 RIM =394.30 $I REVISIONS a"IN=381.48 8•IN=385.26 WILD IN=388.10 6"UD IN=389.90 -3 �-S- NEW SEWER LINE& MANHOLE (2)fi' UD IN = 390.55 8. OUT = 381.38 W OUT = 385.16 6" UD OUT = 389.10 6" UD OUT - 390.90 CB # 21 15" OUT = 390.55 -I THESE PUNS WON LATEST PURPOSE SHREVISIONS SINXIIO i OF STA. 31+30, 23.5- FIT. +>-F� - - - -�- - - - iTN - - NEW FOOTING DRAIN &MANHOLE ' ONLY BE USED iql INC PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: 9[C1S SMH#8 SMH#ll 15'IN=387.40 15'OUT=3B8.40 ^ 1S"IN=385.25 RIM =392.50 CB#24 SKETCH CONCEPT STA. 28+50. CL STA. 33+00, CL 2 UD IN = 389.00 = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE R UNDERDRAIN 18.OUT =3B5.20 CB#18 1)e STA. 34+50•12'RT. �\ ) 0 PRELIMINARY RIM = 394.00 RIM = 395.86 15" IN = 388.65RIM) 1 \; B-IN=382.58 6"IN=388.10 STA. 395.8, 12'RT. 1FIN=388.65 =39IN= Opp FINISH GRADE CONTOUR 1. ) FINAL CB#15 RIM•39580 (2J6"UD IN=390.40 M I 1 8" OUT = 382.48 8" OUT = 386.00 15" OUT = 388 80 �- W NEW WATER MAIN 8 HYDRANT % \ ,\ y STA 25+00, 12• LT. (2)8"UD IN=391.80 15'IN=390.40 94b I / \� _ 0 RECORD DRAWING SMH #9 RIM = 392.10 15" IN = 387.35 CB # 22 15' OUT = 390.36 FM NEW FORCEMAIN , I \ i, / '� - - pro} no. STA. 29+28, CL 6- LID IN =388.10 15'OUT =387.30 STA. 31+30,12'LT. - - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE _ \ \/^ SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 RIM = 398.00 6' UD OUT = 388.10 RIM = 393.00 _ PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE / / i "" 4 9Or5'eY 8' IN = 384.08 15" OUT • 387.60 CB # 19 (2J6' UD IN = 389.00 1 / A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 8' OUT = 383.98 STA 30+21, 12' LT. ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE \ - 15'OUT=388.85 - - \---- 1 '�� CB # 18 RIM = 394.30 - yy design STA. 26+7g.75, 1Y RT. 8' UD IN = 390.30 t � �•� -� O 5 � � r'7 SPEAR STREET 8 VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 - - - - _ PROPOSED STREET LIGHT 1 ti i i +i i i ABR RIM=393.90 6'UD OUT=391.30 CB#23 / FOUNDATION DRAIN 6" UD IN • 389.90 12" IN = 388.00 STA. 33+00, 12' RT. EXISTING TREE LINE ,j 1 4 USLI OP�N,,7�pA�El I I ' tlrpum MANHOLE DATA 6"UD OUT=390.90 15"IN=388.00 RIM=395.50-------3qQ-- EXISTING CONTOUR 5 i +IBP TdIBOwEDYW:� SITE PLAN & '�R FDMH#1 FDMH #3 15" IN IN(E)=383902090 15"OUT=387.95 15'6IND38960391.50 - - - _ WETLAND BUFFER I � � 1 �NEIOHBORH�OOD PIA#Y SPlCE4 1 A J + 3 i ''AA checked RIM=397.0 RIMm#3 18"IN=(W)=38 1S"IN=39.60 WETLAND BOUNDARY , UTILITIES - SOUTH dDUG ate 8"IWOUT=388.50 6'IN/OUT =384.50 .. EXISTING WATER LINE GRAPHIC SCALE FDMH#2 FDMH#8 -S-- $�-5 EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE B SEWER LINE 30 06-06-16 RIM = 396.0 RIM = 389.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & GRADING NOTE: '2 UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE o is 30 ao 120 scale 6, IN/OUT=385.70 6"IN/OUT=384.20 THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT. THIS PERMIT LAMOUR F.UX&DICKI\SON AS NOTED REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND ROOFTOP -X X- EXISTING FENCE Consulting Engineers, Inc. GUTTERS IF INSTALLED COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL In Mel 14 Moue Drive ( ) �_____________� EXISTING CATCH BASIN BCULVERT l ) ON SHEET 15. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL APPLIES TO THE REAR 1 Incn=30W. Essex lunaioq vT 05452 HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR UNITS 23-26. 28-31 & 33-37. Tel: 802-R]8-4450 , rr c�J[ `\�\41EXISTING PATH LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE- 5 FEET) WITH FINAL DESIGN TO AVOID \\ TREES ALONG HEDGEROW. _ t6 PAVED PATH 1 __ .._ ` "• \ ' PAVED PATH _ _._ _ _.-�'� \ \ .......... . TYP AT � \ � -�� •�� _ ._.--. � -'�---NEW B"CL52 DIWATER W. W � � 9 10. ` •_ PATH Jr� �\ &"CATI DI UTURE STUUSE I !�� - •Ip PAVED —=---=--------_.� W ` J _ � \ TO LOCATIONOMEOFCNSTRUCT WITH CO FIRMED UVM AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. -- /"lam 1-D 8' SDR35 PVC SEWER, TVP WIDE UTILITY AND PATH EASEMENT TO HE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON �.-384"'- UNIVERSITY OF VERMONTS STATE -., _ - ...� � � 3l4"TYPE'K COPPER WATER ;- v / N � 5'GONGaET SIB _. _.. 378 � W CL52 DI STUB FOR FUTURE \ AGRICULTURALCOLLEGE \\ SERVICE &CURBSTOP. TYR TYPICAL2IIT-3"CAL. HARDWOOD USE, LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH � \ .�_ N/F '\ `•, W - l62 I WATER -� �- TREE, TOTAL OF 14 TREES. SPECIES TO UVM AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. \ \ \ \ / 26'X$'TAPPING �, , INCLUDE SARGENT CHERRY, COMMON INCLUDE- -.HACKBERR EEst OAK \\\ Ball I / / SLEEVE&VALVE EXISTING 2P DI CWD HIGH brEAGSTER �qT LFAST40F EACH SPECIES) �\\ \ , 'SEE SHEET2 �, SMH pS E _ 0"SDR35 PVG D \/A— "W / SERVICE TRANSMISSION MAIN I i 2 CB #1 ry E '- / ; PLAN OF CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN VALVE PIT I 5-' _ --' y}¢ ------------- C J \ $EWER PUMP STATION 1 -- / \ ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER GRAPHIC SCALE SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT, THE / Lr CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT. 30 0 15 30 60 120 AND THE VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE I STORMWATER POND I NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, APPURTENANCES AND WATER pn lee0 LINE CROSSINGS. 11nch • 30 e. WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEW WATER SYSTEM TESTING, FLUSHING, AND DISINFECTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON OLIVIA DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET. CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON NOWLAND FARM DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET. LEGEND THE PINNACLE AT SPEAR NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE FED BY THE NEW WATER SYSTEM THROUGH THE SPEAR MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE WORK. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE WATER DEPARTMENT ON — $ ® S— NEW SEWER LINE & MANHOLE THE SEQUENCING AND EXECUTION OF THIS WORK IS CRITICAL TO ITS SUCCESS. +.-FD- - - - �- - - - -Fo- - - NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE THE CONTRACTO SHALL PROVIDE ADVANCeWOTICE TQ ALL USERS TH,9T-WILL BE AFFECTED BY ANY TEMPORARY SHUT- \ NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE & UNDERDRAIN DOWN TO ACCOMPLISH THE PROPOSED WORK. THE CGX4T�ACTOR•SF1/CLL COMPLETE THE ABOVE WORK AND RESTORE ALL $$$$$$ \ DISTURBED AREA TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BE�TE(2 THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS. 1 - - / - -\ �- / - _ - �- 414 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR WATERNEW MAIN &HYDRANT PROJECT PR PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UD IW =L BA Now - - \ ~. __ •4 _ _- ... _ S CE �,� �, I ..... - _.. _ - - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE _ 2P WITH .8. \ EXISTING TREE LINE INV •395o PINNACLEATSPEAR EXISTINGLIGNTTOBEREMOVED 1 21 R UD CLEANOUTS COORDWHCITYANDGMP \ I I "-"390— EXISTING CONTOUR INV • 393.8 RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT \ / WETLAND BUFFER TO NEW GREEN STRIP I .. _• 6 - /% �''`i, . WETLAND BOUNDARY S CL520/ H, 1p pA{'ED p— 3� \ - " APPROXIMATE,LOCATION OF EXISTING e' W EXISTING WATER LINE ^, - -6e. ATER WATER STU6 PERFORM EXPLORATORY Yw 'J , ADJUST EXISTING SMH TO I I ,• —5- 5— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE &SEWER LINE I� ' ; EXCAVATIOWPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION \ NEW FINISH GRADE 3y - TODETERMINEEXACTLOCATION I / a9s Z ? / _ T i I / , 1 --�0' UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE 9"GATE VALVE -\ \ // I, -X X— EXISTING FENCE �— _ - -- - / EXISTING SIDEWALK \ \ / - - - - - EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT P20 / j 3>r00 TO BE REMOVED EXIST. Na28 /'coCONs ` aQ 39B 396� .'ky1cr R NOTES NEw SEE SHEET 3 FO SIDEWALMRAMP // \\\_ I 032T/1T REV.PERPRELIM REVIEWICONDITKNJS ABA 12J2(V16 I ADDED UVM BIKE PATH, LANDSCAPING, WATER SERVICES NOS DRIVE - REVISIONS S%q• I - -- - - - DRlve THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ��/�/� 3 39 , / I - - - J -- _ 'DIGSAFE'PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION THESE E PLANS OR LATEST PURPOSE SS BELD OF `V 3,� - SXOO �. _. ,. --� ' �. \ / m os e T ONLY BE USED Tdl THE PURMISE S!N)YM BFLOW: SHFFIS /, I2)UDCLEANODTS SKETCH/CONCEPT I 1 - _- 41+00E:l INV •3933� \ ,�� 0 PRELIMINARY SEE SHEET 3 VALE DRIVE a s M FINAL om CATCH BASIN DATA 0 RECORD DRAWING s \ q / PANG BUFFER / 211'PE ITH E.S. ? EXIST. f0• no. // o T,C 50'WE I I / INV=3B1.T5 �\ -_, p DRIVE CB#26 EXISTING CS#29 P } •' / PROVIDSDEFRESSEDCURB STA. 40+47,13.75'RT. STA.40+50,19'RT. SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 FOR JSTING VACANT LOT1 \ -'.....,. -. % RIM =394,80 EXIST. RIM =394.52 surwy - '—� 6" UD IN = 390.80 NEW RIM = 395.40 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D �2 h0 CLASS 2 WETLAND I \I\ `\ / POTEtFALfUTURE DRIVE /�\ CONSTRUCT NEW �- 12"OUT=389.25 4"UDIN=390.52 deli / l \ \ I , , SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9^ n / % SIDEWALK RAMP 4" FD IN = 390.62 EXISTING LIGHT GB#27 NEW 12"IN=389.00 ABR L , /1 \ , i/ TO REMAIN STA.40+47,13.75'LT. 12"OUT-388.57 SITE PLAN &UTILITIES neRR I EXISTING PAVEMENIEICURB,AH D �'-\ - I RIM =394.80 i \�� _. \ - - 8"UDIN=390.80 checked SOEWWAKAROUNDI{UL-DESAc I 12"OUT=390.25 EXISTING CB#28 PINNACLE AT SPEAR & # '• l l rTOBEREMOVED / \ L \ \ � -v ( _ (/ \ \ CONSTRUCT DRIVE BETWEEN NEW STA. 40+50, 19' LT. OJG �� STREETANDEXISTINGDRIVE. EXIST. RIM =394.84 _ d0{g \ COORDINATE WITHHOMEOWNEft X COUNTRY WATERLINE \� \ \ (MIN IMUMIWGRAVELSUBBASE NEW RIM =395A5 06-06-16 -" AND 2.5'ttPE IV PAVEMENT)--------..___. _..-._. _.. 4"UDIN=391.69 GRAPHIC SCALE - \ \ \ \ I \ I _.- _ _ _ _ / scde 4" FD IN = 391.54 as o 15 30 60 120 -�; _ ^ \\ \ \ \\ \ • `\ 9 I NEW 12" IN = 1 390.00 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED , 12"OUT = 389.64 ConSelting Engineers, Inc. ht. no. / I 14M Drive feat) Essex n, VT 05452 pn 1 Inch = 30 n. Tel: 802-878--878-4450 4 100- vc PVI STA = 10-92.33 PVI STA = 12+22.21 tar vc +64 PVI STA =188.3 PVI ELEV = 388.18 PVI ELEV = 382.08 PVI STA =13+50 PVI ELEV • 398.30A. 1° A.D. = 4.73 PVI ELEV - 389.87 m o A.D. =1.26 KD 18.00 80,w 8l K = 21.14 n A.D.1.23 qq u 7 K=40.15 cYi i $ K=81.32 m > gi 40'vc a 394 394 4i > m m a Q O z Z h_ g ,°;• y m a y Ow$_ ggg FF W rvi, 392 w $ PS •03� •1.% N z m m m > 392 m y W x 20 >�> a m b m �,,y, 3W" —�\ m W1. ®y i[ TIN 39D 390 - - y m FINISH GRADE '/ ` ` -om% O 0.75% ` 388 388 ` rc �fiI FROM CB #2 OUTLET TO B #5 ` TO CB #1 STORMWATER PON #4 c� GROUND _ _ _EXISTING �8 388 " PE V — S = 058 FTIFT EXIST'STORM TER 130•x15" PE __ AFr/FT POND___--- S=0.005 FT/FT CB#8T CB#5381384 �-FROM 382S000FROM nWATER�382 SM # 7275xe SDR35 PVC S =.005 FT/FT 380 380 378 378 m 376 376 - TYPICAL STRI FINISH GRADEEIEV TION DATUM 6L6"V 374 374.00 gg QQ $ g 8f gg A �, g "aS g Pi 6 10+00 11-00 12+00 13+00 14a00 16+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 01-24-1e 1 REVISE SPEAR MEADOW TO ELM STREET ABR REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REWSIONS 9HHK0 # OF ONLY BE UAO FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BLOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING proj. 70'. SPEAR MEADOWS s-y A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design 5 ABR Q. - PROFILE dr— CABR Hetketl ELM STREET ° to GRAPHIC SCALE 06-06-16 10 0 15 w 60 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON scale AS NOTED Consulting Engi—s, Inc Hi no (in feet) 14 MOM D1iW Inch = 30 H. Eesex lunaion, VT 05452 Tel: 802-R78-4450 B 390 __r__T2 388 DATUM J7AAD 00 22 00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 PVI STA = 31+35.69 PVI ELEV = 396.26 PVI STA - 34+50 PVI ELEV - 392.98 A.D. =-3.25 PVI ELEV = 394.39 t0O'VC A.D.=349 K=30.77 A.D.250 W m U U U{mT� 6 a o GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 11 30 so m Id Ian ieuq REVISIONS THESE PLANS WON LATEST KV610NS % WLO / OF ONLY RE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pro} no. eUf008 vey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR PROFILE ASRn VALE DRIVE DJGked dote STA. 20+00 - 35+50 06-06-16 cale 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+W LAMOURF.UX & DICKINSON CK AS NOTED 29+00 34+00 35+00 CousOURkIng Eegl& rA,D 14 M.- Drivc Hi n 0 Esse J—Lion, VT 05452 Tel: 802-87&4450 6LSV CENTERLINE ROAD 398 FINISH GRADE 398 396 39B 394 N + = 394 s a EXISTING 3g2 � ev w � FROM CB #17 GROUND d w d CENTERLINE RDA H i N s � 392 y y FINISH GRADE---- 390 a U � 8" CL52 DI ATER EXISTING — — 5=0.005 F71F7 219k15'PE 388 UN � 5 = 0.005 FTIFT 179x18' PE FROM CB 11 � m � S = 0.0051 FT(FT 228k18' PE 386 — _ — '-- p --5=0.007 FT FT --5=0. 51 F'f/FT 384 — — "PE 68k is, PE I� 1 k15"PE —_. ..._ y S = 0.008 FT/F7 �_ 27g g" SDR35 PVC S 0.005 FTIF 384 " CL52 DI WATER 3� R35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT O TO MITER OIJfLET � STORMWATE 382 POND 223'x8' SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 fTIFT � STO POND 193'xB" DR35 PVC S = 0. 5 FTIFT 3gg 378 FROM SMH #4 rn 378 70 SEWER PUMP S7 710N 378 TYPICAL STRE ET CENTERLINE 378 FINISH GRADE 374 20+00 21+ g PVI STA=29+00 K=28.82 tarvC K = 40.00 m$ PVI ELEV=398.50 � � tar v0 tarvc WA.D. _ -2.49 K =40.10 n �' ar ,9" < 398 398 x 1.491{, � .e o a �RpOE -125 1.25% 388 394 394 FROM C TO CB #20 19 FROM CB #25 TO CB #24 % ------__ -- ---- FR —_—_ T ---- CB #72 St#21 382 380 --- -- ---- _ � S 0.005 FT/FT —_-- II-- 3=0.005 /FT 180k1 -- ---_---'" -- 390 II �— S 0.005 FTIFT 118k15' E V 8' CL52 DI WATER 0.005 FT/FT 120'x15" E 3� 8" C152 DI WATER 388 388 �— 14 � 3B8 8" SDR35 PVC S 0.0050 FTIFT c7 384 N 384 *� F 382 � q N 3B2 380 = 380 378 378 378 378 374 374 rarvc PVT STA • 37-50 $ PVT ELEV = 398.14 A ui A.D. = -2.23La CENTERLINE ROAD g y ~ n FINISH GRADE S g = m 398 o m O Z 398 396 396 394 394 392 392 390 3. 38B 388 388 388 384 384 382 382 380 380 378 378 376 376 374 374 36-00 37+00 38-00 39+00 40+00 41+00 VALE DRIVE STA. 35+50 - 41+00 11 >7' g-I.Es—ETWT0HALCY0N— MR REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHWLD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW. SHEETS � SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL W � RECORD DRAWING °"' F •+ SPEAR MEADOWS Pro} no. survey 3w00 U m ' A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D d c SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR PROFILE draw50+00 51+00 62+00 53+00 ABRn VALE DRIVE 41+00) checked GRAPHIC SCALE (35+50 - HALCYON LANE 30 0 5 30 m e0 & HALCYON LANE dote 06-06-16 scale Os f-3 LAMOUREUgi & D, ON AS NOTED i IM6.30 W Cvvsultivg Engineer, Ire. Inc IJ Morsc Drivc ht. no. Essen luriction, VT OS4S2 Tel: 802-B]R-4450 N ro F m EXISTIN GROUND jC11.52 2 PE CULVERT A WATER EXIST. B'D I I I I WATER STU I I FROM CB W28 TO EXISTING CB � EXIST. 8' 3DR35 PVC -----�__ �a EXIST. 12'PE APPRO EXISTI MAINS (MATE LOCATION OF WATERBSEWER LABS TYPICAL STRE FINISH GRADE TCENTERDNE w� z< 396 J N Fd- x Fin 392 u 392 m 0. 390 -- _ � � � � E705T1NC' 3: 388 __ ___-.� Z GRAPHIC SCALE tiL/ —_ � _ � — ��Z, \ \ 1 \50 0 25 10D 200 1 t ` r 5 AT \ ) I) \ '/ M x = 'rrs�`-\ `\i 1t Incn� Aw\ 12 TO 12 TO /'� - 9 i 9 GT 8 TO w— `- — — - \ "x - - , 00, SEEO INSET BELOW F REMAINDER OF �\1\1I LANDSCAPING PLAN t\\\\ t\ \I� v12 TOSEE TSHEET TREE PLANTINGS JAH AL-ONG WATER - 4.`Y\1 i �o-4• _ram \ _ N\\ MARC \ a T \ z \ I I \ 1 � 1_ �-, `� I -"-:t -- _ --_-• 1 1 -_. \ 7TBr 'yam✓ ,;�,r-,g THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY E' PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION - - TYPICAL WETLAND BUFFER 1 MARKED (SEE i \ \ -\ �- �-• �� `- - - TO BE NOTES THIS _1 S SHEET) -, 1 ,t 1 1 J - / STREET TREE / (TYPICAL) I :' / - •- - i - 1 \ TYPICAL WET BUFFE I/ 1 ( /' ------ TOJ\ \ BE MARKED (SEE NOTE THIS SHEET) \ THE WETLAND BUFFER SHALL BE //% -- •- _ _..._ __ _ / r �� I `,ASV MARKED WITH BOULDERS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE WETLAND i i � LE DRIV THROUGH THE PARWOPEN SPACE / . )EYPICAL WETLAND a FER cc = _ , / —� ' TO BE MARKED (SEE `� / 8 UA y -� - 1 \ J T i L NOTES THIS SHEET � \ ` /',}' 7 GT R ROCK SHALL EMEND A- - _ I I WETLAND BUFFER DEMARCATION SPECIFICATIONS MINIMUM OF 121NCHESABOVE GRADE 11 t (� / I 1 •\ . IIOR 1 '-'I'. Ir // ' SHALL 1i2wwera E—CIMTHrEE �Ess THrw VA l I//A I-- A A - �se- / 1. WETLAND SOUNDARIES IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SN4LLl 21 INCHES. W DVAARCATEO USING EITHER COMINUIXIS SRlT MIL FENCING OR EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC INSET SCALE: t-. BOULDERS. BEFORE SETT WG BOULDERS OR FENCE POSTS. THEY SIML.L BE STAKED TO INSURE TWIT THEIR LOCATIONS ACCURATELY DELINEATE 3PS 1 / - _ 1 ` THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND BUFFER OR LIMBS OF IMPACT AS SHOWN PLANT LIST ON THE PLANS. II\ 11 / ( _ YMN.1\ II \• - / 1 I 1 / 1 SPUT RAIL FENCING SHALL CONSIST OF ROT -RESISTANT WOOD OR ALL LE MATERIAL AND SHABE MAINTAINED IN GOOD _ / 9 AL f M • CMHER OND T ,. T ..� MI 1 N. I ( If "-1 BOULDERS ETF O THEEST FENCE UM OF POSTV5FEETONCTIONIN AND 25 FEET FROM THE NEAREST FENCE PORT WHEN TRANBITIONING �- - II ttY ,_ FROM ONE TO THE OTHER ALLY BOULDER / `� FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES: ) - Y n MINIMUM OF 18 OECIDUOUS SHRUBS AND 12 EVERGREEN SHRUBS SHALL BE tp R 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AN IAN IS M PRESENT THE PROPOSED .--NG FOR THE ROADS AND THE PROPOSED / / 1 PLANTED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. THE CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PAINTINGS FOR A / '• UNITS. SEE OTHER PLAN SHEFTS FOR STREET AND UTILITY DESIGN INFORMATION. Y ' - \ CONTAINING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS MAY BE APPORTIONED AROUND THE BASED PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING UPON THE LOCATION OF WINDOWS. PORCHES. 2, THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO PRESENT THE LANDSCAPING PUN C-J EPTS. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF DECKS, RETAINING WALLS. AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS, RNITMGS MAY BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTED LOCATION OF THE HOMES, FINAL GRADING, 14 PIS II I / I � / _ -- "' B UA I . I I ,. / 2. PLANTS SHALL SELECTED FROM THE LISTS BELOW, BASED UPON THE BUILDINGS EXPOSURE. A MINIMUM 2 SPECIES SHALL BE SELECTED FROM EACH RETAINING WALLS. AND UTILITIES. 10 OM _ � I GROUP IDECIDLN)US SHRUBS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS) ✓�I FOR SUNNY UNITS FACING SOUTH AND WEST j]3�I 4'A 4 nF R� RTC A Q���%iJ1a n M �V`` �I �,� �- • C 9 TRIM STREET TREES TO PROVIDE S EEET TTBTHEWFIRSTTMMEERBRA NCHND UMB THEE TRUNK TREE PIT 2 ,jICK MULCH A MINIMUM OF 5 FROM TRUNK ♦VXV V CUT AND REMOVE WIRE MESH BASKET. CUT AND REMOVE ROPE AND/OR UNDISTURBED SOIL ROOTBµI.AFTER PLFROMACEMTopENT IN TREE PIT. LOOSEN REMAINING BURLAP T A I FOR SHADY UNITS FACING NORTH AND FAST FOR ROOT DEVELOPMENT. O LLOw B OWL \ W l \ (TRAN6PLAlLT�DNEW ¢ / , S / / BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION W/SHOVEL AND BLEND PLANT MIX 3 X BALL dA. WITH EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE SOIL TRANSITION 1. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT ME TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES MERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL MTH SOIL. 2. STAKING REOUIRED ONLY IN SITUATIONS WHERE TREES WILL BE SUBJECTED TO WINDY CONDITIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT ME END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 3. TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER PLANTING 4. EXAMINE ENT 1 AN `. \' '�.�- TAPE PRIOR TO IPLANTING ATO PREVENT GRDLING ND REMOVE ALL NURSERY REE PLANT LIST -1317 SPEAR STREET APPROXIMA E LIMITS OF 2' HIGH 3AA V/-C�� l „ e `, J�J� v S. THERE SHALL BE NO WATERING BERM INSTALLED AROUND TTREES� ROPE. STRING AND SURVEYOR EARTH BERM. COORDINATE ` WITH LANDOWNER. I .I'?F AA \ \ FT / 2 H.E TO REM ODOTH OF SMHAI X, BAAKkaN.. Ca NA Sire R_Aw MA Hvh.'.LL.w: AJAn CRMFPk I--IL_-C >l. pep vH,u w'Bnllwne[ad wr Net UroLNma e'b'IH,i NAB eA _ e' WMM See B, PLANT MG SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING RATIO, 3 PARTS EXISTING SOIL, 1 PART TOPSOIL 7. TREE PIT TO BE 3 TIMES AS NOE AS ROOT BALL B. PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR CRUSHED ROOTS AND DEAD OR INJURED BRANCHES. TREE PLANTING DETAIL Bp• QY BAwAllIfft~ III—N.- S/ R-Arb 31r rr T I' 27 1 ,Heer.JJmwaMlYaWlwpun 'kb Msp4 I I IMN.nfm N.nalr' M AL 32 Bmly nl rv'I/n r1A I al. BAN nn., I— Iv N AR IY Aae / enno (: en Mnek ] L.I. 1 e fw b.nU OT 23 Gla.. A Il Au IlaneY,rawA 2173 J'CY. 4nl AmraN IC IL Piu ul aA Ovary 2la, 3'l'Y Wx eNm NAenin lei OM Ie N,rn.,, wn. r.nvpBur OA 21R'-J•CIA NABnA.n l:r.reninP leiehl OR 21M -3'CAL Te m,+r.vwr Y.INnd 21M •30Ci LA L'Inu'M.Yrw Gbbr Sln'-I'GI. iFRA AN 22 A—,e .ie. BAB PU 21 Pkry Alwv beeMyN BBB rs 16 I'inur,ev/w.I be nleMM B.A. ur,n.vn 2in, -3•CM BeB TV 7Agb rv.mnwn, rvA,.'.. rvrnu..,,wniry L'w. ronnne�enr oABWa.rr.�Mr 11"21* 1 REVISESPEAR MEADOW ROAD TO ELM STREET AM OB-0B-1T NEV PER ARBORIST COMMENTS AND DRB FINAL APPROVAL WT O 1-17 REVISEWETLANDBUFFEROEMARCATION BJT 03 27-17 ADD PLANTINGS AT 1317 SPEAR, REVISE PER ARBORIST MR REVISIONS TRESS PLANS MIN LATEST AEVIS MIS 91GMD p oNT K USED FOR THE PIIRm s m IILdM: 9BFTS SKETCH/CONCEPT F-1 PRELIMINARY FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON PTa} n0. s`7� L&D design ABR LANDSCAPE PLAN ASIR checked DJG dale 06-06-16 LAM.Iting & DICKINSON II mll ling Engineers, Inv. I! Marra Dive Essex UW1FKaV IT OM52 Tel: &12-e]&1/50 "I. AS NOTED t n0 _!�9015S \/ SEE INSET BELOW FOR \ \ i-- -• - •.� �� _ — -- — — — ' REMAINDER OF VALE DRIVE WOODS r / \.._.� Woods x=-�.;• �� — — ja - KPILEWITH�ILT--\ FENCE AROUNOT SLOPE _— 1 i — _ CLASS 2 WETLAND —,Ty ERIMETER MEADOW TEMPO RV STA ILIZED /' — / VALE DRWORK DRIVE EAFOR \ — BUILDIN CONST UCTION •r all \ MEADOW I •,$�, \ / . MEADOW IL STORMWATER P¢ND (11T1, " ^I I r L — —tee — _ _ MEADOW ' BUILDING CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF REQUIREMENTS. — _ — — — — � \ 1. WHERE ROOFTOP RUNOFF EAREA RECELL BEIVING DIRECTED F RIL(I-AWN SWALB) SHALL EO TERRAIN ',_ / \ OR TO GRASS SWALES A E NTLY TT AIRUZNG RUNOFF RECEIVING N OR SWAEFF. BE /\)� TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY 9TABNZED BEFORE RECEIV NG RUiOFF _ - _ J2 WETLAND Y. TEMPORARY DIVERSION OF ROOFTOP RUNOFF OR RUNOFF FROM THE BUILDING II`LL—JJJJ/ 1 (J/A/$16 CONST CL RUCTION AREA MAYBE NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION OR FOR THE TREATMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF, THE RECEIVING AREA SNALL BE TEMPORARILY OR PERIANIE Y STABILIZED PRIOR TO RECEIVING ANY DIVERTED RUNOFF. MEADOW / 3. WHERE ROOF GUTTERS WILL BE USED, BUT ARE NOT IN PLACE, A STONE DRIP EDGE SNALL SE PROVIDED TO PREVENT EROSION. 0. EROSIONMATTNGSHALLSEPLACED AT ALL ROOF GUTTER DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS AND . ) SNALL EXTEND SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED ONTO A STABILIZED OR VEGETATED SURFACE. \ „ / S. EROSION MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS WHERE SURFACE GRADING AROUND L"—-. — /j— _. _ — 1 �• /— I i'. THE BUILDINGS WILL RESULT MCONCENTRATEDFLOW. C4AAS 2 WETLAND f LEGEND CLASS 2 WETLAND ,�, �P- — — T i •, �, MEADOW 1 SHALL BEUSEDASSEDNAENTATION BASINS WRING CONSTRUCTION. 1. THE SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL 8E CONSTRUCTED TO THE GRADES SHOWN, EXCEPT THAT THE FOREBAY SHALL BE OVER -EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 1 FOOT BELOW THE GRADES SHOWN2 TYPE I STONE FILL . NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED DUE TOFLY BE PLACED UCTUATNGME IWA ERSLLOPES TO EVELS WITHINILIZE MEBASN�IL IF VEGETATION DOES 3. THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IN THE FOREBAYS SHALL BE MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF 2 FEET. 4. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM THE BASIN SHALL BE DISPOSED IN AN UPLAND LOCATION ON A SLOPE LEW MAN B%AND NO LESS THAN I FEET FROM A WETLAND OR STREAM. THE MATER1 SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER. 1 / Lif v ----- LAM C/ l \J < d7 1 I 1 EXISTING HOUSE �TO BE REMOVED • / / / `I EAR SrR ' MEADOW i I 1yI I /, DEVELO t PED 1 . / LOT II IF/E RIVE �II CLASS 2 WETLAND ie� MEADOW VACANT \ \ \ \ \ \ I DEVELOPED DEVELOPED LfdT ..... I STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT TEMPORARY SILT FENCE ++^ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STABILIZED STAGING I STORAGE EROSION MATTING CB INLET PROTECTION NOTE: THE LIMITS DISTURBANCE SHALL MARKED WITH P• ORANGE POLYESTER BARRIER TAPE CON TI O FEE. AREAS WUCTMNI OR STRORSNOWFENCE.EXCEPTIN PRESERVED WETLAND ON STREAM WHERE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SMALL BE SHALL BE MARK THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. TOF O USED TO GRAPHIC SCALE 50 B 11 lw 2. In IFFU 1 MCI�50 fl. OT-2A-TB REVISE SPEARMFADOWROADTOELMSTREET ABR OSHWI, REVISE PER FINAL PLAT CONDITIONS ABR 04-2017 REVISIONS PER PRELIMINARY COMMENTS/CONDITIONS ABR REVISIONS TKM PLANS WIT LATEST REVISIONS SHOULDaar BE SEO roR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT O PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pro} nD y ,4 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR a awn EROSION PROTECTION AND ABR `DJ�XEd SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN dote 06-06-16 LA n.UK & DICKINSON stole AS NOTED ConeultingtinQ EnNlneers, ine 1/ MVrse /hive n E.vaex 1wNlion, VT 05452 Tet: B02-ST84150 r R 1m 6• 1 PAVED PATH GREEN: 0 I I TOPSOIL, 3 I 11 V no 1 ( 3 1"THICK TYPE IV FINISH COURSE PAVEMENT MIRAFI 601 GEOTEXTILE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) MINIMUM 17FABRIC OVERT W TO 1 112' CLEAN ST( DO NOT USE LIMEST( MIRAFI 140N FABRIC OR EO 6' PERF. PVC SOE CONCRETE SIDEWALK I 1 I 3 e 1/i RADIUS 18= SB RIGHT-0E-WAY I DOUBLE YELLOW LINE T THICK TYPE III FIN SIR I COURSE PAVEMENT CONCRETE BASE THICK TYPPAVE CURB ® ENT COURSE PAVEMENT COURSEY �— 3=1I3" S=tl3'IFT IS 51"ll"74- MINIMUM 24'FABRIC-/ 24'THICK GRAVEL BASE OVERLAP IRS PER STATE SPEC. 704.06 OR #704.05 FINE) 17THICK SAND 1B' MIN BORROW (AS PER STATE SPEC. #)03.03A) PUBLIC STREET WITH PATH TYPICAL SECTION NTS SD RIGHT-0 WAY SEE FILMS L 4'11011LE YELLOW LINE i 11Y THICK TYPE III FINISH COURSE PAVEMENT Z l- THICK TYPE II BASE COURSE PAVEMENT MIRAFI 60OX GEOTEXTILE _Nt13' OVER E UAL TOR APPROVED EQUAL) (OR APPROVED (AS PER STATE SPEC. #7N.M 24' FABRICf THI SASE OR #701.011 FINE) OVERLMINIMUM OVERLAP OR 07NEL IRS PER STATE SPEC #704.06 PER STNT01.05 FINE) Ir THICK SAND SORROW /1ASPER 18'MII STATE 9PEC. 0703BU) PUBLIC STREET WITH SIDEWALK SECTION NTS 1/2• RADIUS PRIGS TO PAVNG. THE PORTION OF CURBING T TO BE IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT SWILL BE COATED WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. CLASS B CONCRETE NOIES 1) CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10' SECTIONS WITH 1/0- JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2) CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASNTO DESIGNATKN M-1521 (1/2- SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK) 3) ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD (APPROXIMATELY 28 DAYS) CONCRETE CURB NTS SIDEWALK RAMP WITH BROOM FINISH SURFACE- FA S' LAN. B B L A J C 24- e ^ e STRIP CONCRETE CURB DETECTABLE LA WARNING SURFACE SINGLE RAMP ON TANGENT, NARROW OR NO GRASS STRIP SIDEWALK RAMP W BROOM FINISH SUI CONCRETE CURB DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SINGLE RAMP ON CORNER RADIUS, NARROW GRASS STRIP BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CURB. SIDEWALK RAMP NTS 4'-D 1 /2• RADIU� TAPER 7• -� i •:'1:.• ::C : �FINSTN- GRADE 10=J INSTALL AT ALL ENDS OF CURB SECTIONS IS•J TYPICAL TAPERED CURB NTS SIDEWALK RAMP hw of MAX. 1/4-REVEAL w< u ROADWAY SURFACE X MAXIMUMS LKpm Section A -A CURB NAPWMRY S._6. AVINMNWY MIN WIDTH AOVMNO (IrPXAI ) 7, 42 SIX Section B-B 2' '- CURB TRANSITION WITH DETECTABLE RAMP WITH GSUIT WARNING SURFACE CONCRETE CURB Section C-C NOTE: THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PLATES SHALL BE CAST IRON. IL' T i i I I O WAILR SEE PLANS �'1II CONCRETE I SIDEWALK 4' TOPSOIL, TYP, 16" STREET SIGNS TO BE PURCHASED FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 2• SQUARE TUBE, 12 GAGE STEEL SIGN POST II SEE VTRANS STD T-45 II 11 POST SLEEVE AND 11 ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS II STREET NAME OWN N.T.S. AREA OF 25 SQUARE INCHES 6. _ 11• RAIL WrrH Y2` PADDLED ENDS" i lv Z 1(\ , 14.GAUGE 4"X2-GALVANIZED STEEL WELDED WIRE NOTES: 1. RALS AND POSTS SHALL BE PREMIUM NATIVE WHITE CEDAR. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM. ACTUAL FENCE DIMENSIONS TO BE SHOWN ON SHOP DRAWINGS MAY VARY. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER. SPLIT RAIL FENCE WITH WIRE MESH N.T.S. Y RADIUS SEE BELOW FINISH GRAD SECTION XI' STREET 2= THICK BITUMI IOUS CONCRETE TYPE III APRON OVER 18• MIN. GRAVEL BASE (VAOT SPEC. /704.05 FINE DR /704.08). tRETL A 0-1 21 KAw. DEPRESSED CURB AT DRIVEWAY SHALL HAVE 1= RADIUS TO EASE TRANSITION FROM STREET TO DRIVE APRON #IUMINDUS CONCRETE KITH SIDES GRASS A DRIVEWAY APRON & CURB CUT NT5 TYPICAL STREET CROSS-SECTION NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS, THE 2011 VERMONT STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND THE APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE CURB WHERE T WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT. 3. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE BASE AND FINISH COATS OF PAVEMENT WHEN THE FINISH COURSE IS NOT PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BASE COURSE PLACEMENT. 4. THE STREET FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5% 5. WHERE LEDGE EXISTS IT SHALL BE SHATTERED TO A MINIMUM OF 2'-6^ BELOW SUBGRADE. 6. YELLOW OR ORANGE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE BURIED 15- ABOVE ALL GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND T.V, LINES 7. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE UNDERDRAINS. THE FABRIC AND GRAVEL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR INSPECTION OF THE SOILS. E R TRAV LI NTHE CONTRACTOR SMALL FURNISH A LOADED DUMP TRUCK FOR TRAVELING ON THE SUBGRADE WHEN THE ENGINEER PERFORMS THE INSPECTION. ADD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER -EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE SOILS AND ADD AOOrtIOW1 SAND BLASE AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER. B. PRIOR TD PLACEMENT OF SAND BORROW OR GRAVEL BASE MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER A GRADATION ANALYSIS FOR EACH MATERIAL SOURCE TO BE USED DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED SPECIFICATION. THIS GRADATION ANALYSIS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MATERIAL TO BE USED. SUBSEQUENT SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ON -SITE MATERIAL IN PLACE FOR GRADATION ANALYSIS BY THE ENGINEER. 9. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERKD. 10. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE DURABLE MARKINGS (3M TAPE). TEMPORARY PAINT MARKINGS SMALL BE PROVIDED ON BASE COURSE PAVEMENT. LEDGE REMOVAL SPECIFICATIONS ALL LEDGE BLASTING AND REMOVAL WORK SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ROCK, IF ENCOUNTERED. TO THE LINES AND GRADES INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THE ROCK AND BACKFILL WITH ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL. ROCK IN PIPE TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED SO AS NOT TO BE LESS THAN SIX INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE AFTER IT HAS LAID. ROCK EXCAVATION SMALL MEAN BOULDERS EXCEEDING ONE CUBIC YARD IN VOLUME OR SOLID LEDGE ROCK, WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, REQUIRES ITS REMOVAL DRILLRNG AND BLASTING, WEDGING, SLEDGING, OR BARRING. NO HARDPAN, SOFT, OR DISINTIG ED ROCK WHICH CAN BE REMOVED WITH A PICK; LOOSE, SHAKEN, OR PREVIOUSLY BLASTED ROCK OR BROKEN STONE SMALLER THAN ONE CUBIC YARD IN ROCKFILLING OR ELSEWHERE; AND NO ROCKEXTERIOR T TH MAX S0 E FALL TOT TRENCH EXCAVATIONS BY THE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER WHICH MAY FALL INTO THE TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS. WILL BE MEASURED OR ALLOWED AS ROCK EXCAVATION. IN ROCK EXCAVATION, IT IS ESPECIALLY REQUIRED THAT BLASTING SRALL BE CONDUCTED WITH ALL POSSIBLE CARE SO AS TO AVOID INJURY TO PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT ROCK SHN L BE WELL COVERED WITH EFFECTNE APPLIANCES; THAT SUFFICIENT WARNING SHALL BE GIVEN TO ALL PERSONS IN THE WIN" OF WORK BEFORE BUSTING; THAT CARE SHALL RE TAKEN TO AVOID INJURY TO WATER PIPES, GAS PIPES, SEWERS, DRAINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES; AND THAT CAPS OR OTHER PRIMERS SHALL NOT BE KEPT IN THE SAME PLACE WHERE DYNAMITE OR OTHER EXPLOSIVES ARE STORED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL LAWS AND ORDINANCES RELATING TO STORAGE AND HANDLING OF EXPLOSIVES. L 1' SHWLDER: T OF IL AND RANT DENSE GRASS (BOTH SIDES) 10' MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE TO OVERHANGING BRANCHES WIRES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS, k OULDER GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICA TIONS 1) UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AND MAY OR MAT NOT BE EITHER ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING LRIUTIES AND SHAM BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY NEW TAP LOCATIONS AND SMALL CONNECT ALL UTILITIES TO NEAREST SOURCE THROUGH COORDINATION WITH UTILITY OWNER. 2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING VEGETATION, PAVEMENT, AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK UNLESS NOTED ON THESE PUNS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH FROM SITE UPON COMPLE71DN OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY SURFACES, LINES OR STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHAM BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT IN WHICH THEY WERE FOUND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. 3) SEE OTHER DETAIL SHEETS OF THESE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS, REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4) ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THESE PLANS. 5) A MINIMUM OF ONE-WAY TRAFFIC SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. CONTINUOUS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC WILL BE REQUIRED AT NIGHT, PEAK -HOURS, AND WHENEVER POSSIBLE DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER, MUNICIPALITY OR ENGINEER, A UNIFORMED TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER SHALL DIRECT TRAFFIC DURING PEN( HOURS. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHALL BE ERECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND TOWN STANDARDS. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT Hr. OR HER OWN EXPENSE FOR ENSURING THAT THE DUST CREATED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR SAFETY HAZARD. WHERE AND WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR VAL BE REQUIRED TO WET SECTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH WATER, APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE, OR SWEEP THE ROADWAY WITH A POWER BROOM FOR DUST CONTROL. 7) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING ANY WORK, CUTTING PAVEMENT, BEGINNING THE INSTALLATION OF ANY UTILITIES, BRINGING IN ANY NEW GRAVEL OR STONE FOR THE NEW BASE, PAVING, ALL TESTING, AND FINAL INSPECTION, IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS. 8) PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, ALL MATERIALS SMALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY. 9) ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6 INCH LIFTS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO 95X OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO 7-99 STANDARD PROCTOR, AND SHALL BE TESTED AT 500' INTERNALS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10)BACKFILL UNDER PIPES IN FILL AREAS SWILL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. THE PIPES SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED OVER ADEQUATELY COMPACTED SOILS. 11)THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEGMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED, MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN PAVED OR GRASSED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTATION. 12)CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND CERTIFICATION IS OFTEN REQUIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS DETAILED ON THESE PUNS BE OBSERVED BY LAMOUREUX a DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. (LBID) TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK S BEING PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. LAD WANES ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR PROBLEMS THAT MAY ARISE FROM: FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE DESIGN INTENT THAT THEY CONVEY, ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PLANS AND SPEcinCATIONS OR IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS WITHOUT LRD'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT, AND/OR FAILURE TO SCHEDULE OBSERVATION OF THE WORK AND TESTING PROGRESS. 13)THE CONTRACTOR SMALL COORDINATE THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT OR LOT CURB CUTS AND PIPE SERVICES WITH THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 14)AL SLOPES, DITCHES AND DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH, CLEAN AND --FREE-OF POCKETS WITH SUFFICIENT SLOPE TO ENSURE DRAINAGE. F MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BOTH SIDES TO TREES, BRANCHES, POLES. WALLS FENCES, HYDRANTS, SIGNS, OR SIGN OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. - 21/2'BINMINOUB PAVEMENT I-1. IV WEARING COURSE �1 IQ'TYPE It BASE COURSE I I r 5' IMWRIRI , , I16' DENSEGRADEDCROSHEDGRAVEL PER VAOT SPEC. 714.05 SHOULDER 6 j TYPICAL 4" TOPSOIL AND PUNT DENSE GRASS �- MIRAFI 600X FABRIC OR NOTE: FINE CRUSHED GRAVEL HAVING A DEPTH OF UP TO a MAY BE USED APPROVEDEQUAL FOR FINE GRADING ON TOP OF THE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE GROSS COUNTRY PAVED PATH CROSS SECTION NTB L.J 7 "V y7, L I «.L^ e.._ . ... N✓S TANTRCVL(1 TYI'A M1,B(WX yNeLf SUMMT (tgT�t I B"sJ�s sNc c uAeo �Ponr �,(V F— 1Lm IT op uU D - 4'i lClCJJ::.:........1r• TeR nro nDXLs srdA4`eil �4-tS.e « � KUI. Plf YA NO 5 P IXIT Y. Row l MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAILT AR"�A�16 (SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SUPPORT) C, `1� SEE VTRANS STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL J-3 FOR MAILBOX INSTALLATION NOTE: ON CROSS-COUNTRY MANHOLE FRAME a COVER SSEVER I/lEENAHRI LINES, RIMS SMALL LEBARON E A MINIMUM 6" ABOVE LC266 OR E EQUAL. FINISH GRADE b. NO PARGNG OF INTa— BRICKWORK ON JONTS 1111 GRATE WITH MORTAR SHALL BE ALLOWED GHMI FRAME 10 RISER AD UST RIM WITH CONCRETE RISERS C4T8 PRECAST REINFORCED COAT EXTERIOR OF CONCRETE WTWO (2) COATS OFCONC. MANHOE CONE AND RISER r-24'ASTM. WATERPROOF SEALANT 3.-D- COPOLYMER S[[ SPECNuIIONs POYPROPYLENE ASTC RUNGS WTH 1/2' OMOF 60N FOR Yx TESTING PEWIPEYENTS OR PEINFOR(EMENT OR EQUAL. tY O.C. 0 MG RUBBER GASKET IN ACCORDANCE MIX A.S.T.Y. C-443 AND —I r BUM ROPE WELDED STEEL NRE FABRIC PRECAST CONCRETE SHELF AND INVERT CAST IN PLACE RUBBER CASKET FOR I VARIABLE STANDARD w TFRTI T M LONSi. (TTP. ALL PMEs) LENGTHS (1.2.3 e 4 FT.) 2' RISE (MA%) GRANULAR BACRFLL FOR CHANNEL - STPNIO�ARD �1PUClUREs AOT SPEC T04.OS D -0 PLUG E D/2 1 A /• (2,3 e 4 rT.) PATEMENT PA. 12- MAX 4" \ SLIT B• 2' THC COONORETE BABEL MIN. 2. �• /� / Y' i /. \\// HEIGHT. 11 TO 3/4' N O 8. OG NOT EAON MY DO UK LIMESTONE EXTFNO BEDDING TO UMITS OF EXCAVATION TYPICAL PRECAST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NTS I III AMHOLE RADIUS WALL (Mlx.) ) I I l MANHOLE CHANNEL NTS FINISH GRAM BACK ILL WiTH APPROVED EXCAVATED MATERIAL IN 6' LIFTS IN SIMS OF TRENCHES 4 FT. OR MORE IN MPD` ENTERED BY PERSONNEL �_ BE SHEETED OR SLOP D TO THE ANGLE OF REPOSE APPR �D ROCK FREEI %mem. LIFTS 'No S' ONES 3/4- CRUSHED STOKE %� WW UNDISTURBED ��L TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER TRENCH HIS [NDBFimv a>f. n IF COVER IS LESS MAX 5 1/Y, RACE 4- THIN INSULATED IN NO CASE SHALL THE PIPE K LESS THAN 4' OF'COVEROVER THE C= (TY IS OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF PIPE) ONTRACTOR SHALL AT PAYMENT LIMIT ADJUST RIM W CONCRETE PoSI A.S.T.M. N PRECAST REINFORC CONC. MArvH( CONE AND .5 COPOYL POYPROPYA PLASTIC RUNGS % 1/2' GRADE 60 STI REINFORCEMENT EQUAL. If I GRANULAR BACKFILL FOR STRUCTURES SHALL BE APPROVED NATIVE BE OR VTRANS SPEG ]GLOB PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBER BOOT FOR ALL DOUBLE LATER OF BITUMASTC FLEXIBLE SEALANT AT ALL JOINTS (I r MD.) - WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC VARIABLE S7AROAII0 STANDARD LENGTHS (1,2.3 e 4 FT.) Y I I6' I LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT / lY CONCRETEMBA. MIN. 2` /� SB' /, /\�/ HOONT. �31,11SHED STONE BEDDING PRECASTN UNITS vTRARS SPEC 704026 EACH WAY EXTEND EXCAVATION 10 UTS EXCAvgTIOx TYPICAL PRECAST STORM MANHOLE HIS PROVIDE COVER MARKED "SEWER" OR 'STORM' PRO DIE WATERTIGHT 5-1/1' DIAMETER X 36• OAR TALL VALVE BOX TOP WITH A TOP FLANGE. INSTALL 3/4' INSTALL BOX FLUSH WITH CRUSHED STONE FINISH GRADE SUPPORT FOR VALVE AS NOTED BOX TOP ON PLANS 12" 8" CLEANOUT DETAIL (STORM & SEWER) NTS rNISH GRADE UNDISTURBED SOL BACKFILL WITH APPROVED EXCAVATED MATERIAL lTA „C o THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS \I THE SIXES OF TRENCHES n 4 FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH ENTERED BY PERSONNELm IF COVER 5 LESS THAN 5 1/2', SHALL BE SXEETED OR SLOPED TO THE ANGLE _ _ _ _ _ _ y PLACE 4- THICK INSULATED BOARD. WIN IS SUITABLE OF REPOSE FOR BURIAL OVER PIPE. 12" ('o' Is OUTSIDE APPROVED ROCK FREE BACKFILL- COMPACTED IN 6- LIFTS (NO 6. DIAMETER OF PIPE) STONES LARGER THAN 1 1/2' DIAMETER) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT c ALL TIMES KEEP THE TRENCHES ENTIRELY FREE OFWATER TG6dl I UNTIL ALL WORK S FINISHED 3/8' CRUSHED STONE �lyT.f AND READY FOR BACKFILUNC BEDDING � LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT D+2 FEET UNDISTURBED SOL TYPICAL STORM SEWER & DRAIN TRENCH NTS TY CAST COMPLIANT GRATE GROUT FRAME TO RISER ADJUST RIM WITH CONCRETE RISERS - ice. #4 AT 6. O.C. EACH WAY CAST N PLACE RUBBER GASKET SHALL BE USED AROUND ALL ALL BACKFILL STORM SEWER PIPES THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS ` PIE 3. 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. A.S.T.. C4]8 PRECACAST CONCRETE STRUCTUflE u 65 AT 6. O.C. EACH WAY LEDGE PAYMENT / / ,. / E%TEND BEDDING TO LMITS OF EXCAVATION LIMIT 3/4CRUSHED STONE BEDDING PRECAST CATCHBASIN (YARD) NTS USE PVC PIPE OR PRESSURE TREATED 2" X 4' TO MARK LOCATION AND DEPTH OF SERVICE CONNECTION. EXTEND FROM PLUG TO 2- ABOVE FINAL GRADE PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT 3' BOUNDARY 6" MINIMUM SERVICE THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CE 35 PVC CONNECTION 1 TEMPORARY SHALL RUN PERPENDICULAR PLUG FROM THE MAIN TO AT LEAST THE STREET LINE I PRE -CAST OR POURED IN -PLACE 3500 PSI CONCRETE RISER BETWEEN C.B. TOP AND BOTTOM OF CAST IRON FRAME. MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL DE 8 INCHES. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED. ) HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON FILL GAP WITH GROUT ADA COMPLIANT FRAME B DRAW. USE CASCADE NEW CURB SHALL REST ON TOP GRATE WHERE POPE > 51< VOF BASIN COVER - ADJUST nDGni OF CURB AS REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS NO CURB, TOPSOL AND GRASS TO BASIN AND USE 4 FLANGE FRAME FINISH GRADE THE 140N FABRIC SHALL COMPLETELY ENVELOPE THE STONE UNDERDRAIN TRENCH ON THE SIDES.BOTTON,TOP AND ENDS GROUT FRAME TO CONCRETE 9;1�4 THEFRAME OPENING SHALL MATCHFABRIC ENVELOPE TYPICAL THE CATCH BASIN TOP WITH NO T�-'+ AT 8" O.C. EACH WAY OVERHANG ~• 6• LID CLEANOUT MINIMUM 6' HIGHER —V ES THAN Q OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ALL BACKFILL TMOROlO1LY - 3A 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS 6' UD IN B' U.D. A PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBER PI E BOOT FOR ALL STORM PIPES _ 6" OR LARGER IN DIAMETER FABRIC--- --I SAME ELEVATIONS FABRIC UNDERDRAIN IN A 21• 3. 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. A.S.T.M Clle PRECAST 5 AT B' O.C. EACH WAY CONCRETE STRUCTURE 12. i+ UNDISTURBED SOL EXTEND BEDDING TO LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT 3/1' CRUSHED STONE BEDDING LIMITS DE EXCAVATION NOTE: CATCH BASINS MAY BE LARGER THAN SHOWN ON IRIS OE TAIL WITH MULTIPLE OR LARGER DIAMETER PIPES IN ONE STRUCTURE. PRECAST CATCH BASIN NTS 1 / LED PAYMENT PAYMENT / / 11 1/ LIMIT MINIMUM SLOPE 1/4-/Fl \i ( FOR SANITARY SEWER OR 1/8-/FT FOR UNDERDRAIN PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT UNDERDRAIN CARRIER PIPE OR SANITARY SEWER MAIN SEE SEWER TRENCH DETAIL DO NOT CONNECT UNOERDRAIN FOR SEWER MAIN AND SERVICE TO SANITARY SEWER MAIN BEGGING DETAILS SANITARY SEWER OR UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION NTS SANITARY & STORM SPECIFICATIONS 1) SANITARY AND STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL BE OF THE SIZE AND TYPE INDICATED ON THE PLANS PVC PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 CONFORMING TO ASTM 0-3031, ASTM D-3212, AND ASTM F-1]], CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M-190 FOR ACCGMP PIPE AND AASHTO M-246 TYPE B FOR PGLYMERIC COATED STEEL PIPE, CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M294, TYPE S (SMOOTH LINED). 2) ALL NEW GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE LEAK TESTED BY A LOW PRESSURE AIR TEST AND DEFLECTION TESTED. THE LOW PRESSURE AIR TEST WILL BE USED TO SIMULATE INFILTRATION OR EXFILTRATION INTO OR OUT OF ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEMERS. ALL TESTING WILL BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE ENGINEER. AIR TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMEO IN ACCORDANCE WIN ASTM C828-80. THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A PRESSURE DROP FROM 3.5 PS TO 2.5 PSI SHALL BE 1.2 MINUTES PER 100 FEET OF 8' SEVER. AFTER THE FINAL BACKFILL HAS BEEN IN PLACE AT LEAST 30 DAYS, THE DEFLECTION TEST MAY BE PERFORMED. NO PIPE SHALL EXCEED A DEFLECTION OF FIVE PERCENT (5%). IF THE DEFLECTION TEST IS RUN USING A RIGID BALL OR MANDREL, IT SHALL SRALL HAYS A DIAMETER EOUAL TO 95X OF THE INSIDE DIAMETEfl OF THE PIPE. THE TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT MECHANICAL PULLING DEMCES. ALL MANHOE AND PIPELINE MATERIALS, METHODS AND TESTING SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE 'NTH CITY AND STATE STANDARDS AND THESE PLANS. 3) ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE INVERT BY THE VACUUM TEST METHOD DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. FOR MANHOLES UP TO 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A VACUUM DROP FROM III' TO 9' OF MERCURY SHALL BE 2 MINUTES. FOR MANHOLES GREATER THAN 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME SHALL BE 2 MINUTES AND 30 SECONDS PLAN VIEW NTS WATER MAIN PROFILE VIEW HIS IF THE SANITARY SEVER PIPE IS LOCATED ABOVE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS ONEACH SIDE THE WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER = 10' MIN. SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED (SEE PLAN STORM SEWER - 5' MIN. s NEW) O STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PIPE 10' MIN. -� --- WATER MAIN STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PIPE 18' MIN. f I O STORM ON SANITARY SEVER PIPE 10' MIN. (IF THE SANITARY SEWER PIPE IS LOCATED SINGLE 20' NOMINAL ABOVE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PIPE LENGTH OF WATER PIPE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED WATER / SEWER PIPE CROSSING NTS WATER DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS CAST IRON COVER MARKED WATER M GENERAL: This item shall .... let of the labor, equip ment, and mateial required for the complete cnalruclion the watmmaina anda which shall incwde ex wtlan, bac.oling, pipe, valves, tees, hydrants, elbows, reducers, and all other appurtenances necessary for complete Wolwmoin system as indicolel an the accepted drowl.g.. All material, and installations shell be approved by the local municipal watm authority. 1.2 WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIALS DUCTILE IRON PIPE Pipe shall be o minimum diameter of eight inch,, (e") and carimm to current AWWA C6)0 and ANSI Specification A21.51. Push -an )oinl pipe shall be mmnum thickness Class 52. Pipe shall be cement mmtm-lined an the inside in .mdance With AWWA M51.51 or ANSI $pecif atin A21./ except that the cement -lining thickness shall not be less than three-sixteenths inch (3/16"). A plus tolerance of one -eighth. inch (1/8") will be permitted. 1.3 FITTINGS: Ductile ;,an fitting, shall be ce nt-lined, haw 350 pounds working pr.s L and be in cordnce With AWINA C-110/ANSI A21.10 and AWWA C152/ANSI 21.53 for compact filling,. Mechanical pint nuts and bills shall be high strength, low olloy steel par ANSI A- 21JI , Duelle iron fillings larger than twelve inch. (12") Mall now a at,.dwd body Ingth equal to Close 250 cast Ern fittings. Cast kon Class 250 filling, will be allowed m lieu of ductile iron fitlinga in sizes lmgm than twelve inches (12"). Megdu9 retains, glands or an apW,wd egad Mail be used an all vertical bend, and as shown n the Plane. 1.4 GATE VALVE RESILIENT SEAT: Gold w , Mall be A— C 509 Standard Gale Vol". with mechanical joint. of sixes as required on the plans. All ,V s shall be of cost m ductile irn body, parallel Drags awl, non -rising stem, inside S rew, dwble disk construction with "0' Ring St— Seale. All wiwa to be equipped with a wlwcbox for 0 of 5.5' of c mOleri.I. The Bate Alves Moll open left and be designed for o Working Ipressure of 200 psi. Each wlva shall how makers name, pressure rating, and year in Which manufactured coat on 'he Doily. Prim to shipment Irom the factory, Wall,wlw Mall be tested by hydrostatic preaeure equal to twice the specified Working m.... r Buried wlvea Ma11 be installed With a valor box. 1.5 VALVE BOXES: Cast iron three-piece ,roe-typ.; five and ne-fa0rma inch (5 1/4") staff Ili, mot (6') trench depth. Cast iron cow, marked "WATER• and indicating direction of evening. 1.6 FIRE HYDRANTS: All hydrants we to be 3-way, 5" minimum diameter and limited to the following makes: Walerous Pacer, Mueller Super Centurion w Kennedy Guardian K-810, and Mall conform With AWWA C502. Main Volw Opening: 5 1/4 inches MTV* Arrangement: Two 2 1/2 inch hose noxxles NST threads. One 4 1/2 inch pumper no221e HIS thread,. Inlet Connection: 6 inch mechanical joint. MEGA -LUG and lh,.el block Operating Nut: Standard 1 1/2" pentagon Dir tiw of Opening: Cmnte,dockwiw Calm: Enameled hydrant red body, lop color as determined by Town. Depth of Bury, Hydrant shall be installed to the m nuloctursi• Instructions With nozzles about 18" above finish grade. 1.7 HYDRANT BRANCHES: Hydra oeeembliee Mall consist of a ei, inch S6") mechanical pint gate vdw <nlmming to AWWA C-509; o length of .N Inch (6 ) Class 52 ductile Iran pipe wilt ant -lining; and the fire hydrant. MEGA -LUG retainer gland. or oppr..d eq.ol shill be usetl. no In hydrant an hO at least fill— (15") between the bottom of the steamer cap and m. ground. 1.8 CONSTRUCTION METHODS A. INSPECTION AND TESTING All pipe and fillings shall be inspected and tested in andante with the nulacturere .lificatins and the afwemenlion.d AWWA ac ecifiCatione. The Car. -,W shalle/urni.h Is, app,awl certiFit.tian Irom the pipe m ,tocI— that all test. haw been perfumed With satisfactory'XX Pipe shall not be installed withnt the Engineers or Wolm Authority. approwi. B. INSTALLATION Pipes, c fitlinga, and a l-omm Moll be carefully handled to -id damage. Prior to the date of acceptonceof the project Work by the Done,. the Contractor Mall replace any new pipe w occaewry fund la be d•fectiw of any time, h aI.ding after inetall.lion, at no expense to the Owner. A11 installation antl feeling ah,11 be don, in accordance With AWWA Standard C-600 and ANS Specification A21.11. A11 pipes Mowing c ock, Mour all be rejected. If c ack, In the pipe, me Conlractm may, at his o e Pease and with the Ipprowl oftheEngineer, cut oil the acNsd Dalkon of o point at least IWe1w inches (12") from the viable limits of the ,Ck antl use lone sountl portion of the pipe. All pipes and ,fringe shall Oa Cleared of Ali ill foreign mall' and debris Kier to in.t.o.lian and shall be kepl clean until In. time of acceptance by the Own'. Al all time,, Men the pip, laying I. not actually in progress, the open ends of the pip, shall be dosed by temporary watertight plug, w by other approved m If Wotm Ia I, the trench When work is rmmed. the pluq shah at be re ow 1 until oil dongw of water entering the pipe has passed. The pipe Mall be ins1a11m in trnchm cad at the line and grade shown on the Contract Drawings. My deflection jolnle shall be Within the limits specified! by the manufacturer. All piping and appurtenances connecln to the equipment ..If be wppwled se that no tr sain will be impoam on the equipment. If the puipmenl manufacturer's specifications indud• that piping load, we not Io be transferred, the Contractor Mall submit certification of cornplionce. Cnarele thrust block. Moll be installed an all plugs, lees, and bend. deflecting 11 1/4 degrees m are Care shall be taken to ensure that ancr .,It not Come in ,_,act with Hong- pi •, nta, ar ball, Th• rX,,k,d m of thrust blocks are indicated on the plan. m shall be ae approved by the Engineer. Wheraw, sewer. crone .men Watamnm , the watumain h,II be laid at M,ch on elawtin that the bottom of the Watmmain is at least 18 inches above the tap o1 Ins This vertical aeporalion anon De moinloined Is, that portion of the wotmmoin mooted Within to, feet (10') horizontally of any sewer it cros.— There shall be no physical connection between the distribution system and any Pipes. pumps, hydrants. or tanks ehiM ore supplied ar moy De Lpplled with o water that Ia u may be, eanlaminotm. In instances where the . oI different types of pipe req.ke joining, the Cntractor Mdl furnish and instal OR .«,,,my adopt,,,. All I— piM ng safety dtamards on be in wf,,mw,, With all applicable Stale and Federal Guidelines and oe specified on the Plans, Tha Contraclw shall, at ON time, keep the trenches entirely free of Walw until all work Ie finished and ready far backfilling Alter the wrou. pipeline. have ben nalaiNc. the trenches and Olher meal 10 be tilled Mall be bocklTled to eubg,,de with, Wherever po..No. material a wt.d from the lynch. No III kflling Will be allowed .,to any ...mete masonry has set wll'c'enlly, ae determined by the Engineer. All materid far bmi,filing shall be hoe of rule, slumps, and frost. MOtmials used far ba kfill'ng trenches Mall be Ire, of :two, w 'ghing over 30 pound, No atones rag Ow a antl a nall'ncHee (1 1/2•) n tone longset a'menain Moll be placed within one foot (1')n a1 the pipeine being backflletl. Backlll far .11 pipeline! Mall be placed in Iinch (6") loyal,, each layer being thoroughly Completed to not less than 95 percent of maMmum dry density Ds determined by the AASHTO-7-99 Standard Placid,. PmtIculw precoulions Mall be token in the placement and Campaelion of the bockfill material in .der nal to damage the pipe or .tr.ctm., The backlill all be evenly.. brought ., All watermana shall be Installed with a minfim nl cow, depth of v. (6'). Surplus a t.al m.t.6.l. not ...d for backlill shall be disposed of in r satisfactory to the Engineer. All wrplus material or spoil Mm all be removed promptly ne and disposed of So as at to be obj,,ti ... me to ab.ttw, ar to the general public. Valve bo.m o e to be installed an all buried wlwa, The boxes shag be cost Iran With a rive and me -fourths inch (5 1/4") diameter and long a ngh to tend from thee'nvm e to Finished grade. The oozes shall ncloae the Operating nut and stuffing box of the wlw. Valor bases shall not transfer loads into the wive, Covers shall be close lilting and dirt -tight with the tap of the coven felon with the lop of the box rim. Cow,, snail be marked Water" with a w indicating the direction al opening. Valve Dore, shall be three piece slip-typ, The cwtr,,tm shall wovide o stoble, temporary PVC marker opp,ovea by the En5r at all gal• wlws, curb stop, and at the end of-torlines to a paint Ill, Inches (8) abaw finish grade. The maker shall be seated securely into the ground. C. FIELD TESTING Except as otherwise directed, all pipelines shall be tested. Pipelines laid in awtion or bedded in wale shall be tested prim to backfilling or the pacing of wet, and any expoeee Piping droll be tested prim to field painting. The Contractor shall furnish all gouges, lasting plug, cape, and all other necessary equipment and labor to perform lmkag• and P,em.,e teat in actions of o opp—wd length. Each wlvn section m of one thousand feel (1,000) of the pipe shall be tested. All warm requ ed for reeling Mshall Da Detains. All testing shall be conducted in lM1a pro.-.. of the Engineer. Far the presa.re teat, the Contractor shall develop and maintain 200 pounds per square inch for two hours. FORufe to hold the designated pressure for the tWo-hour Period comtitu We a f,hu of the section tested In, leak.,. test shag be perfumed ently with the mr re lest. During the lest, In. Contractor shall m... the quantity of water req,ked to maintain the teat pressure. Leakage Moll not exceed the quantity given by. J �— 50 x L 148,000 where: L L•Ok0 ,lion, qs in i /est S - Len m of cline !cited 9 pip D - Diameter of ahea pipe in m P - Awraga test Preswre in psi All foaling shall be conducted in accordance With AWWA C-600 latest re' Should any mclion Of the pipe fail either the prase.,, or leakage teals, the Contracts Mall do averylhklg n ewry to locate and repair m replace the d•fectiw pipe, fitlinga, or joints at no expense to the Owner. D. DISINFECTION: Chlminalion of the wolermoin shall be cnducled only after the main has been flushed and a clew strum is Obtained oa determined by the Eng. w. The Contractor shill fmriM ill lobm. equipment, materials, and codnecessary ne wry to disinfect the pipe and opvu,lenances in cwdance With the AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Walermain,, C-651, with the exception of the tablet method. The method of tlisinfeclion Moll be by the continuaue feed method unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. After filling, flushing, and the addition o/ chlorine .d.tian, the free chlorin, concentration Within the pipe shall be at least 25 mg/I, The chlorinated water Moll ra inthemain for a period of al I...1 24 hours. At the and of this period, the treated Water in Gall portion, of them n Moll not haw a esidu0l of leas than 10 mg/I of free chlorine. All disinfection 0011 be (performed under the wpervivian of he Engineer. The disinfection process Moll be deemed occoi le an1y alter (2) amPlea of water from the n.ehed, di,intected m n token by the Engines, and tested at an o,plI-1 laboratory Mow 10 vidence Of b-tmidogical conlominolion. Disinfection shall conlarm to the latest AWWA C-651 reW,in. The pipeline and appmtnmN,e shall be m,I tained in n ,contaminated condition unto fool acceptance. Disinfection mail be repeated When and whore r,gLi,WJ at no „pen,, to the Oren., Until final acceptance by the Done,. E. FROST PROTECTION OF SHALLOW WATERLINES Wat tie with less than e, feet (6) of cow w mew Or where indicated an the plan% Man be protected against Ireeiing by installation of four 'n<n (a') Ihick Styrofamn SM ine.l ing Meets With a total Width of lour feet (4') or twice the Piv diameter, Which,ver Is greater, The Heels ahol be placed a nch- (6") abew the c at the m after compaction of the si nch (6") Ii1l !immediately above the cr r. Car• eh,11 bete ised by the Contractor arcing bockfill and ompactionaver me elyr.lnm Meet. to prevent damage to the sheets. Styrofoam SM Wheel. snail meet the compressive strength requirement, of ASTM D1621-73 and Mall be a nufoclured by Dow Ch—'1 Company, Midland Micnigon, m equiwlwt. In n caseshallthe waterlines haw less man four feet (4') of cover over the tap of the Pipe. MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (IN SQUARE FEET) 3500 PS 3500 PSI CONCRETE CONCRETE I � END AREA BEARING J END AREA / AGAINST BEARING J UNDISTURBED AGANST SOIL UND9TURBED SOIL 'I YPICAL TEESDP,ADENDS-CAPS TYPICAL BENDS NOTE: PLACE 4 mil POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK THR UST BLOCK END AREA NTS Molt: ALL DOMESTIC SERVICES AND DOMESTIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED ACCORDING TO THEIR DEGREE OF HAZARD, WITH A BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, AND MTN AN APPROPMATE THERMAL EXPANSION SYSTEM. — GROUND — BACK%EL WITH CLEAN MATERIAL NO LARGER MAN B' EDGE PAYMENT LIMIT — SEE WATER TRENCH DETAIL FOR TYPICAL BEDDING REQUIREMENTS 13 COPPER PIPING SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE CORPORATION TO THE CURBSTOP IV ONTO LOT CONMACTOR'S LIMIT EXTENSION TYPE CURB BOX WITN PENTAGON NUT CM (TWO HOLE CAPS NOT ACCEPTABLE) PROVIDE PVC MARKER AT TERMINARON. -STAINLESS STEEL ROD BALL TYPE QURBSMP _(AY MoboNALT OR CAMBRIDGE BRASS) TYPE k• COPPER SERVICE OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN " LEDGE PAYMENT UNT 3/4' BALL VALVETYPE , 4' x or x ta' SLID CORPORATION STOP (AY CONCRETE BLOCK McDONALD OR CAMBRDCE BRASS) TEE WATER SERVICE SMALL RUN PROVIDE COMPRESSION FITTING FROM THE MM. BE TR PRESSURE TESL SHALL TO AT LEAST TO AT LEAST THE STREET LINE. PTO THIS POINT, NOTES: I. TEFLON THREAD SEALANT SHALL BE USED ON ALL CORPORATION STOPS PRIOR TO INSERTION. A. SPIRAL WRAP COMPLETELY COVERING THE THREAD AREA WITH TWO WRAPS. S. %K DOPE OR OTHER LIQUID THREAD SEALANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE 2. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL NOT BE PLACED LESS THAN 12' APART ALONG PIPE. NITS TER SER VICE DETAIL ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON VALVE BOX TO FINISH GRADE WITH COVER MARKED WATER TAPPING VALW CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509, COUNTER GTOCNWISE OPENING WITH A WORKING PRESSURE O ISO PSI. PER WATER DEPARTMENT SPECfICATONS 3/4" CRUSHED STONE SHALL EXTEND ABOVE BOTTOM O VALVE BOX Ve CORPORATION IN FIRST LENGTH O PIPE FOR TESTING AND CHLORINATION MEW -LUG RETAINER OR APPROVED Mul 3/4CRUSHED STONE Left 12' DEPTH CONCRETE. THRUST BLOCK SIU TO BE ..R.I.. BASED UPON SOIL CONDITIONS NOTES: 1. MET TAPS SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY BY FIRMS APPROVED BY THE WATER DEPARTMENT. A CL ENT CERTIFICATE O INSURANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED. 2. TAPS TAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM O THREE PIPE DIAMETERS AWAY FROM ANY JOINT IN THE EXISTING %K TO BE TAPPED. 3. AFTER FINAL TIGHTENING AND TESTING, ALL SOTS AND NUTS SHALL BE BRUSH COATED WITH BITUMASRC MUD APPLIED MATERIAL TO THOROUGHLY COVER ALL EXPOSED SURFACES O THE NUTS. AND TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE UNPAVED AREAS I RAWD AREAS THICKNESS O NEW PA1£MENT AT TRENCH SHALL MATCH EXISTING THINNESS AT A MINIMUM, PAVEMENT EFTS .HALL CONSW m 2 1/2' TYPE 11BASE AND 1 1/] TYPE M THICKNRING URSE PAVEMENCOT. TNCKNf55 .lMXOs DENSE SUBBASE OR STDNZO NS ONSE ORAOp CRUSHED STOLE IVmAN4 SPEC. 704.0.)— UND15VRBED SOLL— BACKFILL WITH APPROVED EXCAVATED MAMMAL THGROLONLY COMPACTED N B• LIFTS THE SIDES O TRENCHES 4 FT. GR MORE IN DEPTH ENTERED BY PERSONNEL SHAL BE SHEETED OR SLOPED TO THE ANGLE O REPOSE SAND BORROW (VTRANS SPEC. 70103) FOR D.I. PIPE. R IRE IS WET. 3/8• CRUSHED STONE BEDDING SHALL BE USED. PRIOR TO PAVNG, CUT EXISTING PAYMENT SM UM w 1 FT OWN EXISTING SUBBASE. DEAN AND COAL EDGE O EXISTING PAVEMENT RRON TO PLAOMENT O WEARING COURSE PAYMENT. GIN D EXISTING PAVEMENT BACK A Y w 1 FT TO A DEPTH O 1 1/2' TO STACOR JOINTS IN FRENCH PAVEMENT PATCH. UNDISTURBED SOIL BOLTED HYDRANT TEE - RESILIENT GAATE.—A WATER MAIN ADJUSTABLE TWO PIECE CAST IRON VALW BOX TO FINISH GRADE 3/4' CRUSHED STONE SHALL EXTEND ABOVE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX NJ WITH MEGA -LUG RETAINER GLANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE WATER TRENCH ---1 `INA• CRUSHED STORE DETAIL FOR PIPE AND M. 1Y DEPTH BENDING REQUIREMENTS NOTES: 1. VALVES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED TO MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. CURRENT EDITION. VALVES TWELVE INCHES (12') AND SMALLER SHALL BE BUBBLE TIGHT. ZERO LEAKAGE AT 200 PSI WORMING PRESSURE. VALVES SHALL HAVE N. RISNG STEMS, OPEN COUNTER C OCKWISE AND PROVIDE A TWO (T) SQUARE OPERATING NUT WITH AN ARROW CAST IN THE METAL INDICATING DIRECTION O OPENING EACH VALW SHALL HAVE THE MAKER'S NAME, PREWAS SURE RATING AND YEAR IN WHICH IT S MANUFACTURED CAST ON THE BODY, VALWS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT ON EACH END, AND SECURED TO THE ADJOINING PIPE WITH AN APPROVED RETAINER GLAND. PRIOR TO SHIPMENT FROM THE FACTORY EACH VALVE SHALL BE TESTED BY HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE EQUAL TO TWICE THE SPECIFIED WORKING PRESSURE. 2. BURIED VALVES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A TWO INCH (2') SQUARE WRENCH NUT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN. CAST IRON VALVE BOX AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW POSTVE ACCESS TO THE VALVE OPERATING NUT AT ALL FROM GR TIMES IN INSTALLATIONS WHERE THE DEPTH ADE TO TOP OF VALW OPERATING NUT IS GREATER THAN SIX (8') FEET, A VALVE STEM RISER SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED SULH THAT THE DEPTH FROM THE VALE£ STEM RISER NUT To MADE IS FROM FOUR FEET TO SIX PET (4'-6'), (MINIMUM LENGTH O VALUE STEM RSER IS TWO FEET (2')), VALVE STEM PsOn SHALL BE O HIGH STRENGTH STAINLESS STEEL AND O WELDED CONSTRUCTON, GATE VALVE DETAIL NTS HYDRANT MANUFACTURER TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND MUST MEET CITY STANDARDS HYDRANT FLAG GROUND 4" STORZ CONNECTION VALVE BOX 18"-21' 1e• I/ LIMIT PAYMENT 6' II I MINIMUM MINIMUM 6' BURY 6" GATE VALVE CONCRETE WATER THRUST MAIN BLOCK SEE THRUST P BLOCK SCHEDULE \ CRUSHED STONE SEE WATER TRENCH LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT DETAIL FOR BEDDING 6" DA, D.I. PIPE REQUIREMENTS HYDRANT DETAIL NTS ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN G ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER I. THAN W. LINES AND APP RT NAN S FORA WAT R LESS M . r OARD :HIN IS alueLCI FDRI RUMAL OWA SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE GHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT, THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PIK. IN NO CASE SMALL THE PIP HAW' LESS MAN 4' m COVER OVER O H T R FIRE DISTRICT -AND THE THE C—. STAGGER —Ts So VILLAGE OF JERICHO, THE SBWD SHALL BE IN I No Two JDINrs ARE ONE OVER ME aTnw. NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, . C., IS OUTSBE APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE DIAMETER O PIPE) CROSSINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE TRENCHES ENTIRELY FREE O WATER UNTIL ALL WORK IS FINISHED AND READY FOR BACI FILLING UNDISTURBED SOIL \ LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT 1. ALL I. ADUCTILE 1. IRON PIK SHALL HAVE a MIL POLYETHYLENE PER AWWA 105 / ANS 21.5 2. A MINIMUM OFLL 3 BRASS WEDGES SHABE INSTALLED AT EACN %PE JOINT FOR V OI. PIPE. TYPICAL WATER TRENCH NTS THRUST BLOCK ALL NJ GLANDS SHALL BE 'MEGALUG' OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE; HYDRANT DRAIN SHALL BE PLUGGED. PUMP STATIONDATA A. TOTAL DESIGN FLOW LESS FLOWSI 4] SINGLE FAMILY UNITS"210 GPDNNIT 9.870 GPD INFILTRATION (0.43 MILES x V DIA. X 300 GPDAOH DIAJMILE ton GPD TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 10,802 GPD B. HEAD LOSSES STATIC LIFT = 12.0 FEET FRICTION LOSSES = 12.0 FEET MINOR LOSSES 1.0 FEET TOTAL HEAD LOSSES 25.0 FEET C. PUMP REQUIREMENTS PUMPS & SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY GOULDS OR EQUAL USE TWO (2) NONCLOG SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PUMPING IW GPM AT 25 FT. TDH. THE PUMPS SHALL BE WOWS MODEL 3888Q4,1 5 HP THREE PHASE WITH A 4' FLANGED DISCHARGE CAPABLE OF PASSING 3-SOLIDS. D. PUMP STATION ELECTRICAL SERVICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL AND STATE ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING CODES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY. ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE 12OV240V, SINGLE PHASE. E. EMERGENCY STORAGE PROVIDE 4.15 HOURS STORAGE (PER CITY REQUIREMENTS). BASED ON MAXIMUM DAY DELIVERY RATE OVER 15 HOURS: 10,902 GPD 115 HR. x 4.15 HOURS - 2.828 GAL. REQUIRED STORAGE STORAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE ALARM LEVEL AND WITHOUT SURCHARGING THE INCOMING SEWER MAIN(SL STORAGE PROVIDED= 2.854 GAL. (1,B151N THE EXTERNAL STORAGE TANK AND 1,2381N THE PUMP STATION). F. SUBMERSIBLE DUPLEX PUMP STATION REWIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PUMP STATION: - VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE DUPLEX PUMP CONTROLLER - MULTITRODE (FLYGT/XYLEM) PUMP CONTROL - REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT - HOA SWITCH FOR EACH PUMP IN PANEL - RUN LIGHTS FOR EACH PUMP - ALARM LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACK-UP -MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH - DUPLEX CONVENIENCE OUTLETS IN PANEL - ELAPSED TIME METERS - LIGHTNING PROTECTION - ALTERNATING RELAY & MANUAL SWITCH - TIME DELAY RELAY G. W T WELL LEVEL BENSR EM SHALL BE FLYGT/XYLEM MULTI MODE, COMPRISING A MULTI-SENSORED PROBE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MULTITRODE CONTROLLER. THE PROBE SHALL BE SUSPENDED, WITH A STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING BRACKET AND CLEANING SQEEGEE, AND POSITIONED IN THE RISER SECTION OF THE WET WELL JUST BELOW THE ACCESS HATCH. A REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT SWITCH SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE WETWELL. TESTING DATA A. FORCE MAIN PRESSURE TEST: THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO NOT LESS THAN W PSI ATTHE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TEST SECTION. THETESTSHALLBEOFTWOHOURDURATION AND THE TEST PRESSURE SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAW N- 5 PSI. A LEAKAGE TEST SHALL ALSO BE PERFORMED CONCURRENTLY WRH THE PRESSURE TEST. THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE $HALL BE DETERMINED BY THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: L - IS x D x JP) 1133,200 WHERE L • THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR, S IS THE LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED, D IS THE NOMINAL INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE IN INCHES, AND PIS THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN Mi. B. PUMPSTATION.VALVEPIT8 EMERGENCYSTORAGETANKLEAKAGETEST: THE STRUCTURE$ SHALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER FOR EXFILTRATION BY FILLING THE STRUCTURES TO 12' BELOW THE ACCESS LID. A STABILIZATION PERID OF FOUR HOURS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW FOR ABSORPTION. AT THE END OF THE STABILIZATION PERIOD THE STRUCTURES $HALL BE REFILLED AS NECESSARY AND THE TEST PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL BEGIN. AT THE END OF THE TEST PERIOD, THAN E VOLUME OF WATER CHANGE SHALL BE MEASURED. LIQUID VOLUME LOSS $HALL NOT EXCEED ONE -TENTH OF ONE PERCENT OF THE TANK CAPACITY (0.001 x TANK VOLUME). THERE SHALL ALSO BE NO VISIBLE INFILTRATION OR EXFILTRATION OR THE TEST FAILS. IF THE TEST FAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANDIOR WATERPROOF ON THE EXTERIOR AND RETEST. AVACUUM TEST(ASTM C-122]) SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF THE WATER TEST. A VACUUM TEST WILL BE REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS HAVING A HIGH WATER TABLE. C. PUMP STATION: THE CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL BE PRESENT DURING START-UP. A WATER SOURCE SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO PERFORM A FULL OPERATIONAL CHECK OF THE STATION, INCLUDING ALL PROBE FUNCTIONS, ALARM TESTING, INDICATOR LIGHTS, HA -A SWITCHES, PUMPS AND PUMP ALTERNATOR. THE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE CYCLED THROUGH MORE THAN ONCE TO VERIFY PROPER SEQUENCING AND OPERATION OF THE PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE FIELD TESTED TOVERIFYTHATTHE PUMPING CAPACITY MEETS THE PROJECT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PUMP STATION MAY REQUIRE TEMPORARY SHEETING AND OR DEWATERING. NECESSARY DEWATERING TECHNIQUES SHALL BE UTILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE DRY SITE CONDITIONS. 2. THE COMPLETE OPERATION OF THE PUMP STATOR AND FORCENIMN SHALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TESTING SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS SHEET. THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEER, CRY, PUMP MANUFACTURER, AND THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES. 3. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL MEET THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY. TO INSURE COMPLIANCE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A VERMONT LICENSED ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK AND MATERIALS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL PERTINENT CODES. 4. ALL OPENINGS FOR PIPES AND CONDUIT IN THE PUMP STATION ANO WET WELL SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEALED AND WATERTIGHT. 5. ALL MATERIALS LOCATED WITHIN THE WETWELL SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. SPECIFICATIONS 1. PUMP STATION. VALVE PIT AND EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK SHALL BE ME ENGINEERED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF VERMONT AND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND H-20 WHEEL LOADINGS AT THE DEPTH SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. EXTERNAL EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK TO BE A HEAVY DUTY TANK, AS MANUFACTURED BY CAMP PRECAST, OR EQUAL. WALL, FLOOR & TOP THICKNESSES SHOWN HEREON ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT FLOTATION. 3. EXTERNALLY COAT ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITH TWO COATS OF BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING AND TEST FOR WATERTIGHTNESS. 4. DUCTILE IRON PIPE JOINTS OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. JOINTS INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE FLANGED. ALL PIPING INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURES AND THROUGH THE WALLS SHALL BE CLASS 51 DUCTILE IRON. 5. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE SAND OR GRAVEL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHTO.T-98 STANDARD PROCTOR. BILCO. PUMP MANUFACTURER CRAN APPROVED EQUAL ALUMINUM DUPLEX ACCESS LID AND FRAME ASSEMBLY NEENAH R1843 FRAME B CAST -IN -PLACE. PROVIDE PADLOCKS WITH SAME KEYSET FOR ACCESS LID, CONTROL STAIN EBB STEEL LIFTING CHAIN AS COVER OR EQUAL SLOPE FINISH GRADE PANEL, AND POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH. RECOMMENDEDBVPUMP MANUFACTURER. ATTACH TO RISER. AWAY FROM vALVE PIT 10, ELEVATION=388.0 .III, ,HI +114 8' fi' EL. 388.0 SLOPE TO MORTAR WITH NON-S R K- ORaNgW -- -- - AY 21 . 24'MAX 2' THICK STYROFOAM SM- - - - - - - - INSULATION PANELS o CONWIT TO / SUITABLE FOR BURIAL COPOLYMER MANHOLE 2' S'-6' MINIMUM FIRMLY ATTACHED TO THE `STOEPS 8-12'O. C. (TVPJ JUNCTION BOX STRUCTURE WITH ADHESIVE 48' L D. 5' (TYPI � 4^ EMERGENCY CONNECTION o SENSOR CLEANING CAP (ANDREWS MALE ADAPTOR SUSPENSION BRACKET _oO WITH LOCKING CAP ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH BUM ROPE S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLY 40OZGLl) o OR A RUBBER O-RING PROVIDE CONCRETE USE FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE FOR BB+1. D. THRUST BLOCKS AT ALL PIPE PENETRATION$OFTOR LARGER \ 8"SEWER INLET BENDS 7 \\\\` INV. ELEV = 3]320' / / SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING CHECK VALVE r TEE TO SMHR5 4'CL 51 DI 4'CL 51 DI 5- 5 4'SDR 28 PVC1Y MIN. 1' SCH 40 PVC DRAIN PIPE J PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL � 3 = 12' PER FT SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING -� VERTICAL PIPE SUPPORTS WITH 3/4- STAINLESS 5' THREADED OD ANCHORED t'12 MIN. DEPTH 9la 1 1' HONE INTO WETWELL EVERY 3ON p CENTER(MIN.OF 2) n }� CRUSHED / MULTITRODE PROBE SENSOR /\�//\��\\'x\��\�\� \\ \ PVC QUARTER 4'FUNGEDCAST IRON \\ 4'CL 5101 TURN TURN BALL VALVE SWINGCHECKVALVE. `UNDISTURBED EARTH MODEL TB OR DISCHARGE S^ OY EQUALFLOMATIC EQUAL STORAGE CONNECTION O GE VALVE PIT SIDE VIEW INV. ELEV • 375.0' ALARM & PUMP NTS ELEV • 3i4.W4.B 1st PUMP ON 25' ELEV- D., 374.55' PumpsIoF ELEV = 373.7$ (SEE NOTE BELOW) PUMP FORM SUMP 30' CONDUIT TO USING 2,500 PSI CONTROL PANEL .STATION CONC37,"RETE ELEV = 3i1.25' OR M RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED BV PUMP 12 8- MANUFACTURER 41YA1 MIN DEPTH OF 3Id'„- LY" SENSOR CLEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET i n%tt1 CRUSHED STONE qL ' ]W COPOLYMER MANHOLE STEPS 0&12. 0. C.(TYP.) UNDISTURBED EARTH ___ ________ \ PUMPS SHA ML BE INIMUM OF2'OEPUMP OFF LEVEL HALL BE SET TO MAINTAICONTRNAMI TOP OFTHE PUMPS, THE OFTIFYTH ( \ SHALL ENGINEHE ALTERED FROM THOSE SOWN. E ENGINEER IF FLOAT ELEVATIONS ARE F I PUMPS I i o I i PUMP STATION SIDE VIEW 8'SDR 35 PVC I I I I EMERG. STORAGE I NT8 I I I 1 I I 1 DIA. REINFORCED I CONCRETE PUMP STATION CO \\ e, ALARM LIGHT (2) PR ED (.40 CCA) ` ' S'x5'WOOD POSTS WOOD S.S. SLIDE ME UL RATED NEW 4X DUPLEX POWER METER ASSEMBLIES CONTROL PANEL. SIZE TO HOUSE ALL PUMP CONTROLS AND VFD3. 4- D.I. (BOTH SIDES) DISCONNECTSWITCH PROVIDE CAS LACE KET F FLEXIBLE GASKET FOR MOUNT ALL PANELS ON ALL PIPES 2" OR U (.RGER PRESSURE TREATED (.40 CCA) WOOD PUNKS CAST OPENINGS STRAIGHT IN (NOT RADIALLY) CONDUIT SEAL 11 11 3' ALL ABOVE GROUND CONDUIT MIN. NEMA4X SHALL BE SON W PVC. INSTALL JUNCTION BOX ENCASE POSTS IN EXPANSION JOINTS ON RISERS CONCRETE 2500 PSI CONCRETE r EMERGENCY PIPE SUPPORTS CONNECTION CAP /� / 1 \ 40' TO PUMP STATION \ VALVE PIT -- 1 I \ / e^ 2^ SCN d0 PVC \ � BURIED CONDUIT 4' CHECK VALVE(TYP.) \\ TOPOWER SUPPLY - PANEL '- -' SIDE VIEW 4' BALL VALVE (TYP.) 46 1 D. REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE d'CL 51 DI PIPES l.0 IyIIFII�IIIMd�III¶yl `4+ SDR 28 PVC FORCE MAIN PUMP STATION PLAN VIEW HIS POWER METEIF DISCONNECT SNITCH TELEMETRY ENCLOSURE-�_ _� PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL CONTROL PANEL TOP VIEW NEENAH R1642 FRAME 8 COVER OR EQUAL 4' TOP SOIL, SEED, AND MULCH SEAL JOINT WITH BUTYL ROPE ORARUBBERO-RINGAND MORTAR WITH WATERPROOF NON -SHRINK GROUT ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH BUTYL W OR A RUBBER O-RING MONOLITHIC BASE MINIMUM OF HIG PROVIDE CAST - FLEXIBLE GASKI ALL PIPES Y OR 8' SDF TO PUMP I RIM ELEV • 388.0' WITH BRONZE SCREEN (TYP.) 24'MW 4' GALV. STEEL VENT PIPE PAINTED GREEN (TYP.) 38' DIA. REINFORCED CONC. RISER AND FLATTOP KFIL SANDGRAVEL BACL ONLY W MIN STORAGE ELEV - 378.7 ELEV = 375.7 STORAGE VOL.- 1,616 GAL. /--� SDR 35 PVC TO PUMP STATION IN / INV. ELEV. 3]S.7 SIDE VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK NM SON PSI REINFORCED CONCRETE r-------------------------------1-----------------� LI fi"MIN I I I PLACE TFOR ARGER I I I I I I L I Y 1 I II I I I I I 1 1 1 I SLOPE • 2% A / I ,is 35 PVC \� / % 30^ DIA. ACCESS OPENING 1 fATION 4' VENT PIPE 12' W'DIAREINFORCED CONCRETE RISER AND OPENING FLATTOP I O I SLOPE - 2% I I 13' PLAN VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK NM REVISIONS THESE PLANS M1TH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL (] RECORD DRAWING pro} n SPEAR MEADOWS 1400E Yey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET 8 VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR drawn DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS ABR SEWER PUMP STATION Dh1)eGrCked dole 06-06-16 SCOIe LAM& DON AS NOTED ncSrOUREUX Consulting Engis, Inc. 14MJ ht, no. it sex Juncti Eson, VT 05452 Tel: 802-8784450 13 KEEP END LEVEL FOR MAXIMUM SHEET ROW 50' MN PURK POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DPETH & QUALITY TREATMENT NOTES Fw MN NQUT-DF-WAY 1. POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY TREATMENT SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 3 OF THE "2017 VERMONT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL RULE AND DESIGN GUIDANCE'. AT A MINIMUM, ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO THESE RULES AND THE OUTLINED TREATMENT AS INDICATED IZ BELOW. ANY ADDITIONAL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING THE COMPACTION OF SOIL DUE TO THE TRACKING OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT, ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE STANDARDS. PROFILE ENBTNn aRolAo 1-1/2• ro Y 2. TOPSOIL SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4% DRY WEIGHT ORGANIC MATTER, AND SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM w 9NERAOF .A. slOHE OF 4" OF DEPTH AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. B 3. THE COMPOST USED TO MEET ORGANIC REQUIREMENTS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • A CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO BELOW 25:1. _ • COMPOST SHALL MEET THE DEFINITION OF "COMPOST" IN THE AGENCY'S SOLID ��gAy WASTE MANAGEMENT RULES OR THE CONTAINMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERMONT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RULES §6-1104(gx6-7), §6-1105(e)(8-9) AND Efl o- anTa -9) W1oMWs 3ii*61 • AMAXIMUM A MAXIMUM OF 35% OF THE TOTAL SOIL VOLUME MAY CONTAIN EXCEPTIONAL ° o°A QUALITY SIOSOLIDS AMENDMENTS, AND SHALL BE WELL MIXED. 4. THE SOIL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET BY USING ONE OR A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: 24 PROFILE VAOT SPEC. 703.05 - ROCK BORROW ROpE FLOW LIVE ROCK BORROW SHALL CONSIST OF BLASTED ROCK BROKEN INTO ( VARIOUS SIZES THAT WILL FORM A COMPACT EMBANKMENT WITH SECTION VIEW (AT PIPE IN RATS WDEST DIMENSIONS ANDATHAT SIZE WHMUM SIZE ICH MAYELL BE 36 NCHES INCORPORATED INTO A 24 INCH LAYER OF ROCK EMBANKMENT STORM OUTFALL DETAIL NTS EGETATED SLOPES BEYOND LIMITS OF THE DITCH. PROVIDE 4" OF TOPSOIL AND - ESTABUSH DENSE GRASS (CONSERVATION MIX) ORIGINAL 12• I SLOPE VARIES ROCK BORROW PER VAOT VAOT SPEC. 703.05 OR TYPE II ADD 4' GRUBBING J, F STONE PER VAOT 706.04 (MIN. 24' DEEP, SEE PLAN) MATERIAL AND GRASS V MIRAFI 50OX FABRIC COVER ON SPILLWAY / OR EOAL UNDER AND TO SIDES OF STONE. UNDISTURBED J SLORENCH TO DRAIN PE T GROUND 2' WITH A MIN. SLOPE OF TYPICAL STONE DITCH / SPILLWAY DETAIL NTS 1' MIN 3/8" rl FAN fRUSHFD STONE OR Cl STORM SEWER STRUCUTURE - WRAP GEOTEX71LE FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) AROUND GRATE. INSPE T FABRIC AFTER EVERY STORM AND CLEAN OR REPLACE AS NECESSARY STONE FILTER - SEE SECTION VIEW FOR STONE REQUIREMENTS PLAN VIEW 1. INLET PROTECTION TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL CATCHBASINS OR YARD INLETS 2. THE STONE FILTER SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLOWING EACH STORM. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE STONE REPLACED AS NECESSARY. I THE UNITS OF THE STONE AROUND THE INLET MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE ENGINEER DEPENDING ON THE TOPOGRAPHY DIRECTING RUNOFF TO THE CATCHBASIN. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION NIS I- SIY Mx RIQUT=DF-w, PLAN xOT9 1. THE M ENANCE 91ALL BE MANTANIN A CMdLL TI N WMN WILL PREVENT CNMG a SENME47 ONTO PUBLIC RK 01' -WAY. MIS MAY REQUIRE RE. -TOP DRE59N0 MM _%N. STONE AS GON 3R.S DEMAND AND REPAR AND/. -MELT 0' ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDMENT. ALL SE 9- SE KMPIMEq 1 BY 1MSEEN TRNACDTM Buc TtlWIS-a-r/,r 2. MEE UW OF CALOMN Cx TIDE OR WATER MAY BE MECESSAXY TO COR NOl T RI THE SUMMER. I PROWE APPROPRIATE 1RAR91KN BETMEM STABLEUD LWSIRUCINN ENIRAM,E AND MN9JC BOMT-G-WAY. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT NTS VELOCITIES SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: TOPSOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND INSTALL MATTING, OR HYDROSEED VATH APPROVED BINDER AFTER SURFACE ROUGHENING. SLOPE GRADING NTS OPTION 3: REMOVE AND STOCKPILE EXISTING TOPSOIL DURING GRADING. • STOCKPILE SOIL ON SITE IN A DESIGNATED CONTROLLED AREA AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS, FLOODPLAINS, OR OTHER CRITICAL RESOURCES; • SCARIFY OR TILL SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES. EXCEPT FOR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES, THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE DISTURBED BY SCARIFICATION; • STOCKPILE TOPSOIL SHALL ALSO BE AMENDED, IF NEEDED, TO MEET THE ORGANIC CONTENT REQUIREMENTS: •• PRE -APPROVED RATE: COMPOST SHALL BE INCORPORATED WITH AN ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT BETWEEN 40-65% INTO THE TOPSOIL AT RATIO 1:3, OR •• CALCULATED RATE: INCORPORATE COMPOSTED MATERIAL OR APPROVED ORGANIC MATERIAL AT A CALCULATED RATE TO ACHIEVE 4 INCHES OF SETTLED SOIL AT 4% ORGANIC CONTENT: • REPLACE STOCKPILED TOPSOIL PRIOR TO PLANTING; AND • RAKE TO SMOOTH, AND REMOVE SURFACE ROCKS LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER. OPTION 4: IMPORT TOPSOIL MIX, OR OTHER MATERIAL FOR MIXING, INCLUDING COMPOST, OF SUFFICIENT ORGANIC CONTENT AND DEPTH. • SCARIFY OR TILL SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 4INCHES. EXCEPT FOR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES, THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE DISTURBED BY SCARIFICATION; • PLACE 41NCHES OF IMPORTED TOPSOIL MIX ON SURFACE. THE IMPORTED TOPSOIL MIX SHALL CONTAIN 4% ORGANIC MATTER. SOILS USED IN THE MIX SHALL BE SAND OR SANDY LOAM AS DEFINED BY THE USDA; • RAKE TO SMOOTH AND REMOVE SURFACE ROCKS LAGER THAN 21NCHES IN DIAMETER: AND • WATER OR ROLL TO COMPACT SOIL IN TURF AREAS TO 85%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. S. SOIL DEPTH SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AND ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION. 6. TEST HOLES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY USING A SHOVEL DRIVEN SOLELY BY THE CONTRACTORS WEIGHT. THE TEST HOLES SHALL BE 8" IN DEPTH AND USED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR SELF VERIFICATION THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY PLAN HAVE BEEN MET. 7. TEST HOLES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN LOCATIONS NOTED ON THIS PLAN OR AS SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. TEST HOLES SHALL BE SPACED AT A MINIMUM OF 50' APART. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NINE (9) TEST HOLES PER ACRE OF IDENTIFIED AREA SUBJECT TO THE POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY TREATMENT. 8. A DENSE AND VIGOROUS VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED OVER ALL TURF AREAS. SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, PLANTING SCHEDULE AND SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. 1. EROSION MATTING WILL BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:IV OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS 2. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING. INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. SOIL SURFACE SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH WITHOUT ROOTS, STONES OR OTHER PROTUSIONS THAT WILL PREVENT THE MATTING FROM BEING APPLIED IN FULL CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE. 3. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE MATTING IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH NTH APPROXIMATELY 12' OF MATTING EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE MATTING WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12• MART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPUNG. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF MATTING BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" PART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATTING. 4. ROLL THE MATTING (A) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. INSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE SIDE OF THE MATTING IS AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL MATTING MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE MANUFACTURER'S STAPLE PATTERN CODE FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND APPLICATION. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE MATTING. 5. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL MATTING MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON W771NG TYPE. 5. CONSECUTIVE MATTING SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE - WITH THE UPPER MATTING PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE LOWER MATTING) NTH AN APPROXIMATE 12" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA. APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS ENTIRE MATTING WIDTH. EROSION MATTING INSTALLATION DETAIL NIS TURF ESTABLISHMENT SPECIFICATIONS ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT DO NOT HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, ROOFS) OR ARE NOT LANDSCAPED WITH BARK MULCH, SHALL BE STABILIZED NEW GRASS COVER. ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING FOR ESTABLISHING NEW GRASS COVER SHALL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, AND THE APPLICATION OF SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME (WHERE APPLICABLE), AND MULCH SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE FOLLOWING: 1. A MINIMUM OF 4' OF APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE DONE MIEN THE GROUND OR TOPSOIL IS FROZEN, EXCESSIVELY WET, OR OTHERWISE IN A CONDITION DETRIMENTAL TO THE WORK. FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, ME SURFACE SHALL BE RAKED. ALL STONES, LUMPS ROOTS, OR OTHER OBJECTIONAL MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. 2. URBAN SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY IN ALL AREAS AT TIE SPECIFIED RATE. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AFTER PERFORMING A SOIL TEST AND BE APPLIED BASED UPON SOIL DEFICIENCIES. LIME SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED AS NEEDED BASED UPON A SOIL pH TEST. 4, MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE SEEDING OPERATION BY NOT MORE MAN 24 HOURS. MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER THE AREA AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT ME APPLICATION OF A TACKFIER TO HOLD THE MULCH IN RACE, IF NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE MULCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN APPROVED TACKIFIER WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:IV SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. ALL DITCH CENTERLINE GRADES GREATER THAN 5% OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. EROSION MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NTH IOOX AGRICULTURAL STRAW MATRIX STITCH BOUNDED NTH DEGRADABLE THREAD BETWEEN TWO PHOTODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE NETTINGS, NORTH AMERICAN S150 OR EQUAL. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FULL GROWTH OF GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. VEGETATION GROWTH SHALL 8E PERMANENT AND SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION OF THE UNDERLING SOIL UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF PRECIPITATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING AND CARING FOR SEEDED. MULCHED, AND AREAS OF ESTABUSHED VEGETATION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. URBAN MIX GRASS SEED X BY WEIGHT LOS. LIVE SEED PER ACRE TYPE OF SEED 31.5 45 CREEPING RED FESCUE 37.25 37.5 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 31.25 37.5 WINTER HARDY, PERENNIAL RYE 100 120 / LIVE SEED PER ACRE URBAN SEED MIX SHALL BE USED BONG THE NEW STREETS AND ALL LAWN AREAS STANDARD EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. THESE ELEMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE SITE SPECIFIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS EROSION PREVENTION 1. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, THE AREA OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE LIMITED TO THOSE AREA(S) THAT CAN BE ACTIVELY WORKED AND MANAGED WITH THE FORCES AVAILABLE, AREAS THAT ARE NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED FOR A PERIOD OF 5 DAYS OR MORE, SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED. Z. THE MAXIMUM AREA OF SOIL DISTURBANCE AT ANY ONE TIME ON THE ENTIRE PROJECT PARCEL SHALL BE LESS THAN 3.5 ACRES. 3. SEDIMENT BASINS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS. AND OTHER MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN ANY LAND. DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE. 4. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF SNALL NOT FLOW DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES UNLESS CONTAINED WITHIN AN ADEQUATE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL, FLUME, OR SLOPE DRAIN STRUCTURE. 5. WHENEVER WATER SEEPS FROM SLOPE FACE, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR OTHER PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED. 6. BEFORE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS OR PIPES ARE MADE OPERATIONAL, ADEQUATE OUTLET PROTECTION AND ANV REQUIREQ TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL LINING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN BOTH THE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AND THE RECEIVING CHANNEL. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SMALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS IN ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIA: A. NO MORE THAN SIN LINEAR FEET OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES. 8. ALL SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS A PART OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN AN AREA THAT IS: A. LESS THAN 5% IN SLOPE. B. AT LEAST 1W FT. FROM ANY DOWNSLOPE WATER BODY OR CONVEYANCE TO A WATER BODY (INCLUDING STORM DRAIN INLET OR DITCH). C. VEGETATED. PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED FOLLOWING DISPOSAL. 9. FOR ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER BY VEGETATIVE COVER, SEEDING MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 15. 1D. ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION BY OCTOBER 15 MUST BE STABILIZED BY ANCHORED MULCH AT THE WINTER APPLICATKA RATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE, OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (E.G. ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTI. DORMANT SEEDING (E.G. WIN WINTER RYE) IS RECOMMENDED. 11. DISTURBED AREAS BORDERING AND DRAINING TO ROADS MUST HAVE AN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT BARRIER SPANNING THE EDGE OF THE DISTURBANCE TO PREVENT WASHING OF SEDIMENT ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO ROAD DITCHES. 12. HAY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. HAY MULCH APPLICATION DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT A RATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. WHERE SUBJECT TO BLOWING, MULCH SHALL SECURED IN PLACE BY TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT (WITH TRACK RUNNING PARALLEL TO SLOPE), A TACKIFIER, NETTING, OR REPLACED WITH PROPERLY ANCHORED EROSION MATTING. 13. PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS OF PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL AND COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING (NOT WITHSTANDING STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ELSEWHERE IN THIS PLAN). 14. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN M DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED. STABILIZATION 15. ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST HAVE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITHIN7DAV9. AFTER THIS TIME ANY DIS TURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED ATTIRE END OF EACH WORKDAY. THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY. A. STABILIZATIONNINO PRE QUIREO IF FORECAST CONTIN UE T N THEAREAWITHINTHE THE NEXT24 L HANDOURS THEREISNOPRECIPITATION FORECASTFOR THE NEAP 24 HOURS. B. STABILIZATION OUTLET) WITADIF ETOF2 FEE OCCURRINGIN A (.G. HOUSE EXCAVATION (I.E. UTI I OUTLET) WITH q DEPTH OF Z FEET 00. GREATEN (E.G. HOUSE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY TRENCHES). 16. MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONTINUED STABILIZATION. EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW, ALL SITES SHALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS, SUCH AS MULCH OR ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED OR SECTIONS COMPLETED. A. ON THE CUT SIDE OF ROADS, DITCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH ROCK RIP.RAP OR OTHER NON -ERODIBLE LINERS (E.G. RECP), OR WHERE APPROPRIATE, VEGETATIVE MEASURES SUCH AS SOD, B. FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUCH AS BORROW OR STOCKPILE AREAS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS WITHIN 50 FT. OF A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION, A DOWNSLOPE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING, FOR EXAMPLE, OF SILT FENCING, SHALL BE INSTALLED MIND MAINTAINED TO CONTAIN SOIL. EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS ADJACENT TO CONVEYANCE THAT PROVIDES RAPID OFFBITE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT, SUCH AS A CUT SLOPE AT AN ENTRANCE, SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC OR GEOTEXTILE TO PREVENT SOIL LOSS UNTIL IT CAN BE STABILIZED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL SE MAINTAINED TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING MATERIAL OFF SITE. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS. SIMILARLY, STABILIZATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CONVERTING SEDIMENT TRAPSIBABINS INTO PERMANENT (POST -CONSTRUCTION) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. D. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS. DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. E. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 IRV), OR 33.3%, AS WELL AS PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAP', AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL, UPON COMPLETIONS, BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH SOD, SEED AND ANCHORED STRAW MULCH, OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (RECP). AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM SMALL NOT SE DISTURBED. SEE NOTE 1 FOR REINFORCING WHERE SLT FENCE IS LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WEILAND. STREAM, OR RECEIVING WATER 4-FT MGM MIRMI IOOX FLIER FABRIC OR EQUAL 0 STAKE O.0 ) MIN. CA�api�®i� %d�l'6�1�11d��/iRT�� q�e1p�,�S�ISIi'q�i9RnEpRFR,n^ 4GPRWIIWNRl0. Ii07011YFABRIC wYMF DRIVEN MIN, 12 IN-E GROUND aF1II(_7,j TO BE 'I KEYED 6 " INTO lw:..:GROUND alum 1) SILT FENCE INSTALLED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, STREAM, OR RECEIVING WATER SMALL BE REINFORCED MIN WOVEN MIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE WINE NTH 6" MAX, MESH SPACINGS) 2) USE ONLY MANUAL METHODS OF INSTALLATION AND CLEANING MINIM WEILAND AND BUFFER ZONE. 3) PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION OR EARTHMOVING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A CONTINUOUS SILT FENCE AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON THE STE PLAN. 4) FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO KEY IN THE BOTTOM OF THE SLT FENCE. IF NECESSARY, GRANULAR BORROW SHALL BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO KEY IN THE SILT FENCE RATHER THAN FROZEN NATIVE MATERIAL. 5) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERMETER OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS NEEDED. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE NTS INSPECTION 8 MONITORING 17. THE ONSITECOORDINATORIS 18. THE ON -SITE COORDINATOR SHALL INSPECT, AND DOCUMENT IN WRITING, THE STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT SITE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES AND MEASURES IN PLACE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, PRIOR TO PREDICTED PRECIPITATION. AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATERTHAN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT WHICH GENERATES A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 19. DURING THE WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD (OCT. 15 -APRIL 15) DAILY INPSECTONS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND DOCUMENTED. 20. INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE REDUCED TO NOT LESS THAN ONE PER MONTH IF THE ENTIRE SITE IS TEMPORARILY STABILIZED AND ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED. INPSECTIONS SHALL RESUME PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE. 21. IN ADVANCE OF A PREDICTED RAINFALL OR SNOWMELT EVENT, ALL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPROPRIATE TO CURRENT AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST BE CHECKED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATING CONDITION. IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO WATERS OF THE STATE, THIS WILL INCLUDE THE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED SOILS ON THE STIE IN ADVANCE OF THE ANTICIPATED RUNOFF PERIOD. PERMIT NOTICE 22. ACOPY OF THE DISCHARGE PERMIT, THE AUTHORIZATION TO OISCHARGE,A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT, AND THE LOCATION WHERE THE EROSION PREVENTION PAID SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IS AVAILABLE SHALL BE POSTED ATA LOCATION ON THE PROJECT SITE THAT IS VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING SEE NOTES ON SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING. SURFACE ROUGHENING GUIDELINES 1, SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, THEREBY REDUCING THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION. AS WELL AS PROVIDING FOR TRAPPING OF SEDIMENT. SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED: - ON ALL SLOPES WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL SE SUSPENDED AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. -MI R TO PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH ON ALL FINAL SLOPES 3 1 V OR STEEPER. 2. SURFACE ROUGHENING MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY TRACKING MIN EQUIPMENT. OR GROOVING WITH DISKS, TILLERS, SPRING HARROWS, OR THE TEETH OF A FRONT-END LOADER BUCKET. WHERE GROOVING IS USED, THEY SHOULD BE LESS THAN 31NCHES DEEP AND NO MORE THAN 15 INCHES APART. 3, THE SURFACE ROUGHENING MUST ALWAYS BE DONE SUCH THAT THE HORIZONTAL GROOVES RUN ACROSS THE SLOPE AND ACT TO SLOW RUNOFF. 4. WHEN USING EROSION MATTING, AVOID EXCESSIVE SURFACE ROUGHENING. MATTING MUST BE INSTALLED IN INTIMATE CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE TO BE EFFECTIVE. 5. NEVER BACK BLADE OR SCRAPE THE FIN& SOIL SURFACE. THIS WILL RESULT IN A SMOOTH SURFACE. INCREASING RUNOFF VELOCITY. SPECIAL WINTER EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INVOLVING EARTH DISTURBANCE CONTINUE PAST OCTOBER 15, OR BEGIN BEFORE APRIL 15. THEN THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED: 1. STABILIZED ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE ENLARGED TO PROVIDE FOR SNOW STOCKPILING WHILE STILL MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL. PACKEDSNOWANDICEMAYNEEDTOBE REMOVED AND ADDITIONAL STONE PLACED TO MAINTAIN THE LOOSE STONE SURFACE AT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS. 2. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED OR DRAWN IN TO REFLECT THE BOUNDARY OF WINTER WORK. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE DRAWN IN TO EXCLUDE ALL AREAS TEMPORARILY STABILIZED FOR THE WINTER, AND AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCE WRING THE WINTER IS NOT PLANNED. 3. BASED UPON THE WINTER ACTIVITIES PROPOSED, THE ONHBPE PLAN COORDINATOR SHALL DEVELOP A SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT SHALL INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM A. ADEQUATE SIZE FOR SNOW STORAGE AREAS B. SNOW STORAGE AREAS LOCATED DOWN GRADIENT OF AREAS OF PLANNED DISTURBANCE C. CONTROL OF SNOWMELT RUNOFF D. PROHIBITING STORAGE OF SNOW IN STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURES. E. A MINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN PERIMETER CONTROLS ISUCH AS SILT FENCE) TO ALLOW FOR SNOW CLEARING AND MAINTENANCE 4. IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE WITHIN 100 FT OF A RECEIVING WATER, SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED OR REPLACED WITH PERIMETER DIKES, SW&ES, OR OTHER PRACTICES RESISTANT 10 TIE FORCES OF SNOW LOADS. 5. THE ONSITE PLAN COORDINATOR INSPECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO INSURE THAT THEY ARE OPEN AND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS. B. SILT FENCE AND OTHER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AHEAD OF GROUND FREEZING. IF PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED OR MAINTAINED AFTER GROUND FREEZING. NO FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL BE USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERMS OR DIKES, OR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE. T. WHERE MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, IT SHALL BE APPLIED TWICE THE STANDARD RATE. OR A MINIMUM OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. B. WHEN MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, AS NEEDED, IT SHALL BE ANCHORED TO PREVENT BLOWING AND REMOVAL BY WIND. ANCHORING MAY INCLUDE TUCKING WIT) EQUIPMENT, APPLICATION OF A TACKIFIER, OR NETTING. 9. TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT, AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH DAY, WITH TIE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: A IF NO PRECIPITATION WITHIN 24 HOURS IS FORECASTAND WORK WILL RESUME IN THE SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS, DAILY STABILIZATION IS NOT NECESSARY. S. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF, SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES. 10. SNOW AND/OR ICE SHALL BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF LESS THAN I'(ONE-11)PRIOR TO TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 11. WHERE EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ON BUILDINGS WILL CONTINUE, OR WHERE VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED IS EXPECTED, A STABILIZED WORK MEAMOUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL. 17Ia, .MLTait ncnlenw�a� STRUCTURE 390 FIN( GRADE 388 388 , OUTLET POOL EXISTING GROUND — �=OUTLET PIPE _ _ — — — — FORE- 382 _ 380 378 _____ __— ____ __. _ DATUM MJV .,,TAM... 0 50 100 POND EAST SECTION 1' = 10HOR. 1' = 5' VERT. 390 388 386 384 382 380 378 150 200 250 I x• I VEGETATED BUFFER ROOF TOP LENGTH � x• ROOF TOPLE NOTE � � VEGETATED BUFFER 1 NEW OUTLET am 388 EXISTING GROUND STRUCTURE 388 OUTLET PIPE 386 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TOP OF B R 386 3.y.7L FINISH GRADE SPILLWAY 384 364 — 352 ROCK BORROW ROC BORROW 382 3w Iwo 378 ____ __ — 378 1 - - -1.. DATUM ff" .F 0 50 ITM.2S PRECAST RENFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR AASHTO KM LOADING WITH PRECAST OPENINGS TYPICAL WEIR OPENING C.J SEE PLAN FOR SIZE A —_ ELEVATION •�(1) HORIZONTAL W REBAR WATERTIGHTRUBBERBOOT T MID -OPENING ORFICE MOOD NOT SHOWN ' A SEE DETAIL THR SHEET .t WE PLAN FOR OUTLET PIPE TYPE 8 ELEVATION OUTLET ORIFICE PRECAST �' OUTLET PIPE —� OR _'LED IN CONCRETE IN IFAGG CENTER OF POND]l SEE— FORNUMBER. SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF ORIFICES)( ccc nc.e�� e- 15' CRUSHED STONE BEDDNG UNDISTURBED GROUND. RENOVEALL MUCK ORGANICS OR UNSUITABLE SOIL AND FILL WITH GRANULAR BORROW POND OUTLET STRUCTURE NTB 100 POND WEST SECTION 1'=10'HOR. 1' = 5' VERT. 150 A41"111111AIILI ERIER TO BE PLACED ENTRY (WE PLAN) CAST IRON AMEBCOVER ORM SL WAY GROUT FRAME TO CONCRETE (TYP.) NON -SHRINK 35' DIA. REINFORCED CONC. GROUT (TYP) RISER AND COVER (TYP.) E� 15'PE tS�FE 0 WATER LEVEL 18' ABOVE TOP PROVIDE WATERTIGHT. OF UPPER ORIFICI 15' OPENING CAST4KPLACE BOOTS AT ALL PIPE PENETRATIONS MINIMUM DEPTH • 5.Y ALL JOINTS SHALL BE (STORAGE VOLUME • 509.8 CF) INTERIOR TMIK DIMENSIONS = SEALED W. ITH BUTYL ti'LONG %T WIDE XB'HKiH ROPE OR A RUBBER O RNG 12' MONOLITHIC BASE RYA.) MINIMUM OF Z HIGH 1B' BELOW ORIFI( N F " INV.RT V 1T MIN. DEPTH OF 3/B'CRUSHED STONE \/� 1. USE A WATERTIGHT, REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE TANK CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING KW IN EEL EXTEND BEDDING TO LOADING AT THE DEPTH OF INSTALLATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM STRENGTH LIMITS OF EXCAVATION OF 5.M PSI AT 2B DAYS, 2. THE TANK RISERS. AND ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALI BE WATERTIGHT 3. BACKFILL SIDES AND TOP OF TANK WITH SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL. ML BACKFILL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHT0-T.99 STANDARD PROCTOR. STORM TANK #I DETAIL um 200 GMV. METAL TOPPUTE 1R ROUND 11 DM CGMP HOOD PROVIDE 3-1-DIA. HOLES EVENLY SPACED AROUND HOOD AT 4' O.C. 1. SLOPE LAND AWAY FROM BUILDING AT S%OR LESS. 2. LENGTH OF 5%(OR LESS)IS TO BE EQUAL TO, OR GREATER THAN, THE CONTRIBUTING ROOFTOP LENGTH(%) 3. SLOPED LARD IS TO BE VEGETATED. WITH GUTTERS. THE ROOFTOP AREA CONTRIBUTXIG TO ANY ONE DOWNSPOUT LOCATION SMALL NOT EXCEED 1.=B.F. 5. DOWNSPOUTS MUST BE 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE NEAREST IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. WITH RUNOFF DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION NT8 EACH ANTPSEEP C(%lM •R11ALL BE A MINMUM 0 2 FEET ALONG THE LENGTH a THE PIPE PLOWABLE FILL OR APPROVE. CLAY UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOX • 18' OR DISTANCE TO TRENCH SIDE WALL OR BOnOM, WHICHEVER IS GREATER STORM P PE 1. A MINIMUM OF THREE ANTI -SEEP COLLARS SNALL BE INSTALLED ON THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE STORMWATER BASIN. $. THE COLLAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PATH FLOWABLE FILL(M M CONCRETE) OR APPROVED CLAY. 3. PAYMENT FOR THE ANTI SEEP COLLARS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUBSIDIARY TO THE STORK WATER PIPE INSTAUATION ANTI -SEEP COLLAR NTS WELD PXPXLtr ANGLE TO CREATE FLANGE PROVIDE 4 GALV. BOLTS ON EACH FLANGE TO ATTACH TO STRUCTURE OPEN BOTTOM BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE ORIFICE HOOD "IS LEGEND —S 5— NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE c_-----i>�------c NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE & UNDERDRAIN 49D�� FINISH GRADE CONTOUR W w NEW WATER MAIN &HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE — — PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING TREES. TREE REMOVAL — — — — — — — 3W - — — — — — — - EXISTING CONTOUR DITCH CENTERLINE W EXISTING WATER LINE —5— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE - - - - - - - - - EXISTING FENCE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT g EXISTING MAILBOX I EXISTING BUILDING PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND SIGN LEGEND ® SYMBOL MARKING O LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN, ® 24• STOP BAR Flill VR-921 (3(r X 36') ® 4" SOLID WHITE LINE Du LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT, 4" DOTTED WHITE LINE ®R3-7 (30- X 30") ® 4• DOUBLE YELLOW LINE ® 8• YELLOW LINE WORD MARKING vT 0A ® PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING SIGNS 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON NEW 2" SQUARE STEEL SIGN POSTS WITH ANCHORS. SEE VTRANS STANDARD T-45 FOR POST AND ANCHOR DETAILS. 2. ALL NEW SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, THE 2009 MUTCD, AND THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS 2012 SUPPLEMENT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A T HEIGHT CLEARANCE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN z -F GRAPHIC SCALE ]0 0 15 50 40 12D Ib bwl PRIOR TO PAVING, COLD PLANE EXISTING PAVEMENT PAVEMENT SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDENING I'MIN. SEE PLANS 2 TYPE N BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT WEAR COURSE EXISTING PAVEMENT MINIMUM 4' TYPE II BITUMINOUS (SPEAR STREET) CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE OR MATCH EXISTING. MAX. 2' LIFTS 2' WIDE AGGREGATE SHOULDER 1/4"/FT (VTRANS SPEC.704.12A) EXISTING SUBBASE t : l`\\ 4 _ 1 4' TOPSOIL, SEED _ AND MILCH EXISTING GROUND 8' COURSE GRADED CRUSHED f XISI INc; - GRAVEL FOR SUBBASE (VTRANS SPEC.704.05) SUSG HAIIh 18" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE (VTRANS SPEC. 704.06A) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ROAD WIDENING DETAIL NIS 1. ALL EXISTING CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE REMOVED BY GRINDING USING A DIAMOND GRADE GRINDER (REFER TO VTRANS SPECIFICATIONS 646.12 REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS) 2. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MUTCD STANDARDS. 3. COORDINATE WITH GMP ON UTILITY POLE RELOCATION WITHIN LANE WIDENING LIMITS ON SPEAR STREET. 4. RELOCATION OF MAILBOXES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH VTRANS STANDARD J-3, MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAILS. J 1 ��-SRiRMttPENCE ., -SBa" CY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION LEGEND FT CND moao�o IPF I- i.�WT-1 [7�f A✓ I 21.W LOCATION MAP ) LA ISHAMESTATE THOMAS 1 LOUISE NIF IN KLEH LIFE ESTATE 1.5' IPF VOL. 405, PG. 728 N,T.S NIF 3' AG NOS°0735� \ CITY OF SO�FURLINGTO MICHAEL 1 MARY VOL. 1254, PG. 279 IPS - 337 60' VOL. 934. PG- 104 P. J E NIFER ILOT SCOLLWS S07°0549�E 90.34' C/jy OF Soul ,-BU 8 JENNIFER MILOT NIF i" IPF NIF VOL. 115, PG. 523 0.8'AG �°-"�364�Y / VOL NIF RLING7gl PC VOL. 643. PG. 297 1" 702 IRF N07"01'59 17 O6' (VgLIVE 268.57 � 7 IPF N0T°14'44"W _ 2.5' AG � �� � / / JOHN LARKIN Ni ( VOL 1010,PG- 77 NOTES: - 1. THIS PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS: A."LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF, SWIFT STREET, SOUTH --�- BURLINGTON, VERMONT, 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAT." DATED 4-2-01, --- LAST REVISED 5-23-03, BY LAMOUREUX 8 DICKINSON CONSULTING IF VALE DRIVE ENGINEERS, INC. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE392 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. '$ _ �- � r � ' B.'SWIFT ESTATES, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT.-DATED6-30-71, BY WILLIS ENGINEERING. AS RECORDED IN VOL. 80, PAGE 184 OR R a T'HE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. 1 / C. 'PLAT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOWS, INC.. R 1 T TARRANT. D 1 C FRANZONI, 1340 SPEAR STREET, SOUTH WM 8 STATE m AGRICULTURAL BURLINGTON. VERMONT-, DATED JANUARY 25. 2011, BY CIVIL m COLLEGE r IRON ROD FOUND PINNACLE AT SPEAR ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF NIF 9.96, S76'35'37'E O�^ 0 �, AG TSF I OPEN S ACE THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. VOL, 134, PG. 364 ,Nj" IRON PIPE TO BE SET ,�. 2- 9 44. 0.9' AGNIF IPS 1411 237,-, w D. 'PLAT OF SURVEY, LANDS OF FARRELL 1 COLE, 1302, 13401 1350 1 SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT". DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2005, BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND m 1 b RECORDS. z 52 � I � E. 'FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT 6.80 ACRES PROPOSED LOl �� AND JOHN LARKIN, PINNACLE SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWlANO TWO) 1 WILLIAM 1 MAUREEN m Qf SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT." DATED 8-21-98, GILBERT LAST REVISED 1-199. BY VAUGHN C. BUTTON, L.S., AS RECORDED IN NIF SLIDE 335.2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURL14GTON LAND RECORDS. VOL. 209, PLa. 225 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE GENERATED FROM °Z SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS RECORDED IN APRIL, 2016. f o j I AND ARE BASED ON THE VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAO83(CORS 1996). HALO I O 7 °4 3 THE FIELDWORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL. 2016, e 4' 1 _ - ��--- 5. THIS PROPERTY MAV BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS AND/OR g/ I' IPF RIGHTS -OF WAY, FL 65.14' 6. MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN 586'01'32W I 1' IP SHED � GARAGE 7. THE WIDTH OF FOUR RODS (66') SHOWN FOR SPEAR STREET IS 0.1' AG 1 5" IPF vi / DAVID 1 LINDA YOUNG 10D.23' BASED ON A DESCRIPTION FOUND ON PAGE 22 OF THE TOWN OF KATHLEEN SAW IELLE �. ISAG _ N/ S74'S6'22'W BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS, 1802-1865. NIF VOL. 412, PG. 99 8. SEE SHEET PL-2 FOR THE METES AND BOUNDS OF THE PROPOSED VOL. 1139 PG. 83 ' S10'44.1 INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES, FOOTPRINT LOTS, AND PROPOSED v < $ p 1'�y EASEMENTS. � 25 � 196.sr t-;-; < KENNETH MILLER, 11 50.00, ' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE S880132'W ZpI �F G. 49 CITYOF SOUTH BURLINGTON VT. VOL. 1274, P/DWL''ImRECEIVED FOR RECORD . 2018 DWL I74.Of .._ 2 OS AT OCLOCK M.. AND 1,P z < 33RECORDED IN SLIDE5AG 9q�8 r) m / [_.. - ` ATTEST: CITY CLERK 70 SWIF NI ... c MARGARETA `\gFE7 p DENCKER H ` a p NIF 01-24-18 REVISE SPEAR MEADOW ROAD TO ELM STREET ABR 4 VOL. 137, PG, 323 04-20-17 REVISED FOR CITY FINAL APPLICATION ABR SIDE /N B•3gJ9 JO/ I Date _,fion MARKI SHE LA /�� f 'SB' - - % "' REVISIONS PHILLIPPE A" s ST ` TSF LANDS OF PROJECT NC NIF REF 0,6'AG GARY N. FARRELL, 14008 VOL. 50, PG. 350 / FOUR SURVEY ROBERT I TAMMY \ ( (geROps , 1350 SPEAR, LLC & JKR AVONDA Elvo SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. DESIGN N/F LAVIGNE \ 7E 7J 1302, 13401 1350 SPEAR ST., SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT ABR VOL. 1045, PG. 221 NIF CIMONETTI TO SNFL a„>?�APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT DRAWN I FUF \� REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS DLH I ABR \� VERMONT, ON THE 1st DAY OF AUGUST , 2017 ♦, 1111 I I f 777z PERIMETER BOUNDARY CHECKED PLAT IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED ♦ 0 ( i f I� ABRIDJG GRAPHIC SCALE SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS FROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER ` ♦1` '� : SURVEY PLAT OWNER. OFFICIAL RECORDS. AND MARKERS EVIDENT DATE 1W 0 eo 1fq 2W 440 OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF ON THE-ROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE •-. DOUGLAS i. 06-06.16 GARY N. FARRELL (VOL 677. PG 4D2)1 REQUIREMENT$,.OF 27 VSA 51403. _ L. SCALE 1350 SPEAR, LLC (VOL 1031, PG 73)1 2018 BY DATEDTH1S'' ,1 DAY OF _ll'7 .2018 NENSON AS NOTED SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. (VOL 747, PG 653) I LAMOUREUX & DICIi1NSON No. 656 ��: Cnn.elliag Engineers, I- SHT. NO 1350 SPEAR STREET ( IN FEED) SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. L[a' l L.S. H656 �zl�f� 1'���♦♦ II4 M. M m VT OSIS? I inch - 100 ft. TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 25,93 ACRES (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) /- X' �ZI f f 1 l l f 1`♦♦ , 8n218TK11450 P L 1 PROJECT PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED TO BE DISSOLVED IRF • TSF SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBED WIRE FENCE STONE WALL IRON PIPE FOUND IRON ROD FOUND T-STAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET IPS IRON PIPE SET Q SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER) NIF NOW OR FORMERLY AG ABOVE GRADE BG BELOW GRADE N PROPOSED 15 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK SIDELINE OF VARIABLE WIDTH PROPOSED VT GRID EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF S �^ BURLINGTON. EASEMENT TO BE SOUTH BURLINGTON. SIDELINE OF PROPOSED CENTERED ON THE SIDEWALK AS EASEMENT TO BE 5 FEET WEST OF THE EDGE PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE PAVED PATH CONSTRUCTED. OF THE PAVED PATH AS CONSTRUCTED. ILA ISHAM ESTATE EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH N/F ' VOL. 405, PG. 726 21.55 BURLINGTON, EASEMENT TO BE T. 8 L. KLEH CENTERED ON THE PAVED PATH AS Ng5•p2 3� W CONSTRUCTED. VOL. 175, 5, PG. 183 - M. 8 M. SCOLLINS fPS r-337.60' P. BRETI GRABOWSKI N/F S07°05'49"E 90 31V , & JENNiFER 1. MIIOT VOL. 115, PG. 523 LOCATION MAP7°01'S9 �17.06' N.T.S VOL= OL.64 68_ ..-_._-.__--_.- L.._.. _ •- M R=1zo00, 32' IRF L- 1 41 N07°14'44'W - '- ....._, 3 2.0o acres + I O 10 1�L- O p 13 Q 30.36' t 12 fps - _ 4 + � I.._ � �.Ys'O b 48.91'R330. •'41E 700�9' L.190 W .. 18 17 8 `3P 1 N04°50'03=W p�v N16'22'16"W 23 PROPOSED 30 FEET WIDE - R Rt� SO7°1141"E R , WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE ^ I � �I4a t64.OT a $ 49 CITY OF 90UTH BURLINGTON tog 80 R=470.00' 270.W V 77 4t"`� R = 530.W 1 R r - " YaWa 4 23"W St PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE N07°1y S3' ,�,W t R = 4 A7" L = 1D9.82' R = 53.. L 54.3T "7" .11 �' ¢ WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE b '.ae4r Fi l PSI° R = ,fig CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON m L = 41.6T L = 83 58' _ �'" gg 'Ey 120.00' \_ R = 1 7. W' -8 ® ... ® ® R t2oax = 1 L = 1 .1 SO4°50'03E gt Sp7.11'41"E 155... y.� /0ar 034f{' A 6g' `16 � 'µ ry 4t"N L = 112,29 1a + ... �r UVM 8 STATE R . 666.00' 3 +I Ii ®.... R - 180.W' Y' L- 160, .�meo AGRICULTURAL L-99.87' t R: 270.W' - h A COLLEGE : 43.24' L = 3.20' 6.80 acres N/F PROPOSED 0' R ro VOL. 134, PG, 364 STORMWATER POND L = IRF _ TSF NO3`23'46"W 299.d4 $ 51 -----'� N R = 531.00' 3.35 acras W. 8 M GILBERT N/F IVSIDELINE -49 m B.6T o / VOL. 209, PG. 225 2.95 acres .m w rn OF PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT TO L=4762' F SOUTH BURLINGTON ® '® R e471.W' 5 L = 211.85' 1 fir® ¢F 285.11' N! 34.55E _ v N I-ANE h; 42 6,67' z 8Y1 R : 230 W' p1 m pg•3q•55"E clggy o 1 0 IPF IP .. / ® ...® ; 7 IPS / KATHLEEN SAWTELLE o I - N/F •6 ,a �..... I . /511Y 0.52 acras VOL. 1139 PG. 83 (k' IPS .48 a IPS 1.83 acres If If ® x z 14.0611 27+E MARK 8 SHEILA PHIIL11 N/F VOL, 50, PG. 350 PROPOSED IS WfDE UTILITY-/ EASEMENT TO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ROBERT 8 TAMMY AVONDA NUF VOL. 1045, PG. 221 r TSF LAVIGNE I CIMMONETTI NfF I N/F GRAPHIC SCALE 700 0 50 100 2W 100 IN FEET 1 inch = 100 ft. APPROVEO BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT, ON THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST. 2017 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 2018 BY (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) m®ammm ®mom OWNER: OWNER: SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1340 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 VOL. 747, PGS. 653-656 TO ,,,111111//II THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. THIS PLAT IS BASED ` ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTEDFROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER .�. ;OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT �ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE An REQUIREME:NT,$OF 27 VSAI14Q3. 4"" DAY OF ?/,D' , 2018/ "ia:DATEIrriTH{S ��� 11L %� ZiGT'f L.S. k656 // 1 # 1 111 %AL LEGEND - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE - - SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBED WIRE FENCE STONE WALL • IPF IRON PIPE FOUND • IRF IRON ROD FOUND • TSF T-STAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET • IPS IRON PIPE SET NrF NOW OR FORMERLY AG ABOVE GRADE BG BELOW GRADE 52 COMMON AREA LOT NUMBER �J FOOTPRINT LOT NUMBER NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 1 (PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT) FOR SURVEY NOTES, THE PROJECT BOUNDARY, AND LOT 52. 2. THE AREAS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAT FOR THE COMMON AREA LOTS EXCLUDE THE AREAS WITHIN THE RESPECTIVE FOOTPRINT LOTS. 34.0' 50.Q'. I .. `....._50.0'...i TYPICAL FOOTPRINT 34.0' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 1-12 8 3541 LOTS 13-21 3,500.f 2,552 s I 440, 54.0' ...... 54.0' ........: 44.0' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 22, 27, 29, 32, 43, LOTS 24. 25, 30 AND 31 45 AND 47 3,080 s f 2.770 a 1 .. _ 600 280 v h 54.0 b o Ni 92.0 -_-600' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT LOT 34 LOTS 23, 26, 28, 33,42 3,600 a f 44 AND 46 3,113 a f CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. RECEIVED FOR RECORD __ .... _„., .2016 AT ............. ...__._ O'CLOCK A., AND RECORDED IN SLIDE 0 ATTEST; - ___ ____.. CITY CLERK GRABOWSKI & MILOT f i y .� e �wBID 1 TYPICAL 8 NGLE PAVEDTATN� �'\\ \ CAFTM EHOME \\ / �....' I � /' .._ f. / 1. ..!—''., _/♦ 11 ,/ V\\_\ KLEH ♦ v I APAVEDPATN /~-„'�_/ •—�'-�L-_/ L/ _ _ r / •' \ ^ OPEN SPACE \ )E WALK "UNIT NMHOIIjE��r CLA882WETLAND ZH;Z T ^ 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION - - \ � S;.g i � . -- ry i �k- \ •taamwz 1 I _J —f \ I ,eaouae _ --.' - I / �� ` • )u.t/,/iir' - l - I�/'V` I\,./� II /,----�.-. -1\ i� M.DENGI�r ♦ \ i / j olos I \) i��`, /i/ `_-- - Ll`� }, _.-. -`N/ J - -: - ��-•� t-.__....JAY/`��;�� SI4 � , �h,- I'-- _IJ-"- / i �I- _ � L-. I 11- =� __' \ uvgLE• IJ - �_ '�'�` I I _ �.. I I _- \ I ��^`\ 1 i /- \\ 111 / I I 4VED I'11fE E. LEGEND v� PROIECT SWNDARY PROPOSED&GMT-0 -WAY ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v EDGE OF WEI— TREELINE ., ---- EXISTING CONTOUR BUILDING SUMMARY 18 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS (3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES Apk 2 7 2G17 City of So. Burlington SHEETINDEX GRAPHIC SCALE 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN IL LIGHTING PLAN 1. 0 50 100 200 40D ISSIGNS & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE &UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE & UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE & UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE IM NMI 5 PROFILE - SPEAR MEADOW ROAD 1 NCA 1 W rt 6 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE _VALE DRIVE & STREET 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDowNER. 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN GARY N. FARRELL & 1350 SPEAR, LLC & 10 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS- STREETS SPEAR MEADOWS. INC. 11 DETAILS BSPECIFICATIONS-SEWER&STORM 13503PEARSTREET 12 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - WATER SWTH BURUNGTON. VT 05403 13 SEWER PUMP STATION APPLICANT' 14 DETAILS&SPECIFICATIONS -EPSC THE SNYDERGROUP, INC. 15 DETAILS & SPEC IFICATIONS -STORM PONDS 4076SHELBURNE ROAD,SUITE6 16 SPEAR STREET TURN LANE SHELBURNE. VT OUR PLI PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT ■ :Illlllluwunur► � '9111111111PIN�� ��� � - c �b`! his%i 1;_ ►N1■ 1 •'de' ". j\ `� ��I►�, r GI ��i �f C�*Ii i•• 'C� _� � � Ili` .� 77 ■,• i �uu&q�� unu • �I � �j &iIJY � �p �f► ' ���, t �nnnin -""����� LL1E11L;�r �_•� I - LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. i � SOILS MAP 901E MAPPING UNIT NSG E -y N.T.S. Cv COVINGTON SATYCLAV D OAa GFC & G4S GEORGIA STONY LOAM C ON LA LMNGSTGN CLAY D OAS MN; MASSENA STONY SILT LOAM C 0.20 V"B VERGENNES CLAY D OA9 ZONING DATA TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER 1440-1 W PROJECT PARCEL AREA -25.0 ACRES ZONING DISTRICT- SOUTHEAST QUADRANT- NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL - NR OVERLAY DISTRICTS - WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER DENSITY: BASE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY • 31 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 1.2 LNITSIACRE • 31.1 UNITS AVERAGE ALLOWABLE DENSITY • 1. UNITS 25.83 ACRES X 4 UNIT&ACRE • 103.] MRS PROPOSED DENSITY - 48 UNITS NOTES,, 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PUN IS TO PRESENT THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT OF THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2. SEE OTHER PUNS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. THE SHALL NOTIFY ., I GSAFE'PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION LEGEND ` PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-0E-WAY ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE > iv PAVED PATH f • WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v v EWE OF WETLMID M ELINE EXISTING CONI TIPICAL 3 1111T OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEA TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY F,� ' .O.F HOME CARRIAGE yt(0 0 o C _0 C) 0 o 0 - 0 m r.� n,,,) o nq VALE DRIVE 'EO C�-,� CLA88 2 INETLAND r PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IBM, (FUTURE PARK) EXISTING HOUSE TO REMAIN 7 tj@ SP �4 �A � i GRAPHIC SCALE +00 0 200 40D � A ��D P.IMIT L e t Iti Lr v. � \ � r 1 \ C _.' 4 .� !— �. ,_ � / `y �•�- L Rp1VAT6Dr _. �. � _ . � �� - �`•� ....., �' _! � j / , � _ ._ 1- � LOT 54 LOT. 53.. 1,1..-.. r 1 �► © ,ram IIII ■ 1■L_. — .A Fair � R �mBE TYPE I PAVEMENT EIA WED t4Aet����ER LTOBE APPIR By i ( J ( L 0 BEE 6PEAR STREET TURN LANE `•" PLAN FOR REL TED SIGNAGE it LEGEND SOLAR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (WITH SIGNS) OSTOP SIGN (SEE INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAIL) © CHEVRON SIGN (.1-B, SEE DETAIL THISSHEET) OCORNER WARNING SIGN IW1-1, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) PEDESTRIAN ZONE.1. (.11.1. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OPATH ENDS SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) © ND PARKING SIGN (SEE DECAL THIS SHEET) NO PARKING IWITH ARROW) SIGN ISEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OPEOESTRIAN EROSSI-(W11-2AWt&TP. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OWETLAND INTERPRETIVE SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) GRAPHIC SCALE 400 ' _ _ LOT 51 CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL 4' WIDE WHITE STRIPES FOR FARMING SPACES sraEE1�� \ PUBLIC OPEN SPACE u —I \ ! i (FUTURE PARK) I }}f _ Lo Is. / LOT 48 J4/ I � --'— ,LL'�`'_. I ' Irl HARDWARE SHALL BESTAINLESSSTEELTHE SIGNPOSTSHAL L BE SET INACONCRETE BASEHAVING A MINIMIM DIAMI1 ER OF I.,'V" 4 O INCHES AND EXTENDING TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF C FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE. THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE EXTERIOR GRADE SOLID PHENOLIC RESIN, WHICH IS RESISTANT TO ULTRAVIOLET (UV) RADIATION DETERIORATION AND AND UNIDER THE THE EMBEDDED GRAPHIC PANELS SHALL HAVE DIGITALLY PRINTED SUBSURFACE IMAGES FUSED INTO A SINGLE PANEL AND UNDER THE EFFECT HIGH TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE. THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE WEATHER TIGHT. THE SIGN PANEL GRAPHICS SHALL BE 241NCHE3 BY w 381NCHE5. WETLAND INTERPRETIVE SIGN NTS BASE MOUNTED FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK STOP 8' TO —I GAUGE 2' SCUARE STEEL GROUND SIGN POSTWITH ANCHOR DOABLE 4• YELLOW CENTER LINE, TYPE I MARKINGS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY . STOP SIGN N.T S. STOP SIGN, 2'4' OFF FACE OF CURB SI� CONCRETE CURB I �� t :. SIDEWALK tr WNITE STOP LOCATED 16 BACK FROM EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY OR 4 FT BEHIND CROSS WALK INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NTS PATH SEE PLAN FOR 91GN LOCATIONS 30' X 30' ENDS W12 TYPICAL PATHENDS SIGN NTS NO NO NO PARKING PARKING ANY ANY PARKING TIME TIME ANY 4— TIME R7.1 X 1 TYPICAL PATHENDS SIGN NTS 'III SOLAR PANEL (ORIENT TO FACE SOUTH) WITH INTEGRATED RRFB� CONTROLLER AND RADA) TRANSMITTER/ANTENNA SS'X98•FYG W11-2 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNS 188) —� BI-DIRECTIONAL RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS ` 13' X SO' FYG W18-TP J ARROW PLANES I") PEDESTALSIGNALPOLE r I, DIAL STD. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, PAINTED BLACK) / - PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY 6 J B' X 12' RRU25 PEDESTRIAN SIGN REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING SEE VTRANS STD. DETAIL E-1T0 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW THE RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON MANUFACTURER SHALL SE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER AND CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN ZONE SIGN NTS X 1B• X 24• -1-1 IL' W X TA RI INSTALL 2 SIGNS TOTAL 1 SMaN FACING SOUTH 1 SIGN FACING WEST TYPICAL CORNER SIGNS NTS GENERAL NOTES: SOLAR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON DETAIL NTS 1. NEWPAVEMENI MARKINGS ON TOP COURSE PAVEMENT SHALL BE DURABLE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 VT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2, TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON BASE PAVEMENT MAY BE PAINT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON 2' SOUARE STEEL POSTS WITH ANCHORS, 4. ALLSIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLEDWITH MINIMUM) FEETCLEARANCE BETWEENTHE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AND FINISH GRADE. QA f SPLR RAIL F�r�'��V I TYPICAL ROCK BORROW r / - MIN. 12' WIDE GATE FOR RV / WITH WIRE MESH i SEWER PUMP STATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY I ACCESS TO POND INLET / OUTLET POOL GRATE - MSU \vIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION - _392- _ i METER 8 CONTROL PANEL / O 1 1 BOTroM•3Te.00 I SE� SHEET 4 ! I II --___---"- 4-X12'OPENING=30100 CONFIRM LOCATION WITH CRY I ' _REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL / ' -" --------- 2.1 ORIFICE •382.85 SPLITf ITT FENCE SEESHEET 13 FOR SEWER DRIVE ANO REPLACE WITH - - l TYPICAL STONE 18'PE WITH E.S. WITHWIRE MESH \ f / _ 18' OUT • 302.60 / STORM OUTFALL _ INV = 381.00 VALVE PIT PUMP STATION pE310N DETAILS TOPSOIL, SEED& MULCH f / g 11i / +I ,38/ 1a WIDE GRAVEL A�CES9 DRIVE I Tp EXISTING HOUSE AND / (t8"THICK CRUSH�GRAVEL) EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK GARAGE TO BE REMOVED / \ STORMWATER EXISTING WATER SERVICE / '" NORMAL WATER• .85 / 1W PE --� _ BOTTOM POND • M1 0 TORE REMOVED / ,' 15"PEWITH E.S, sal W = --- - - 3BB MH/ COORDINATE WITH '._\ INV•382.)0 WATER DEPARTMENT A �1; ! - - / - - - - - - - - e•spR 35 rvc $ } 8a I - / .: CL:bP 2 WETLAND / 24' PE WITH E S. OD MI: 'WIDE GATE 1 1 / ... INV=- 38I \ 3 381 .. .- . / � \ � / l� \ 3BB BI / / 381 I / ' / CBa28 �{ 3B6 / STONE SPILLWAY _.. _.. _... •..\ / I B"SDR35PVC \ l 09/l INV=391.2s / I... -]ez _381 f FFE =3 5 I Ba25 W BFE=33.0 / •... .._/ ' •_.� \ / I STORMWATER POND / '! x `.._., PE u \ / /: 3]8111111 NORMAL BOTTOM PONDOND-382.0 1 ! 1 r I I `�--"♦ \ \ -•\ ts•( / I.=381.0 s SPILLWAY •384.00 \ OUTLET POOL /3 MIN. 1 DE GATE\ - / •\ ✓ I /N 1 ! EIEV E 3SBP10 WAY BOTTOM • 378.00 { , \ 3E�.0 FOR PON•, I OUTLET STRUC RE 15'PE WRH E.3. 1,� I 'L1+OO I X\I I 46 I / ``D ^� LINE STA. - 1 cRArE-3B8.00 INv•3e2.00 TCH 1 ' C I \ 8 12 LT NA y t / 1 5'OUT•38290 X •I 2a•PE WITH E.S. s 1 I 1 \ / I: -186 I \ / 1.B'OUT=382.0011 1 IN' NV•3B3.00 I 2 s VE / 47 �� iIWTHICKCRvMHEDGRAAVEL) � /'h �\P�c` 1 - \\...._ UD Cl OUT 382.0 / / 44 ) \Fps ' FFE • 3 I ��++ FOREppAAYY / W BFE•38y9�2 INV•386. FFE=393.5 1 'i3e0 �\ I / ". -_.. -{. S BOTTOM=3]&00 IiI � / NEW STREET LIGHT ' OR - _0\ / /� •� \ \ ROMH CLASS 2 WETLAND / I I i% ... 3B1 381 I, �1 a S 1 f Pvc - '�/� ../ / \\ 42 1 7 0\ 4rJ l AVTD - NED UO CLEANOUT CB pt - _ TANK NI \ CNHANNEL I � 1 1 43 ) 1 1 I I 1 ! I I XV455 ) 10 PAVED RAIN / �- - - i / BFE • 3Ba. 1 ' IN• PE WITH E.4. StN 3B2 INv=3e3.0 -]&'9 BPVC FM MAJI\ V n A 1 j 1 I I dM �Jz, I e \ NEW STREETLIGHT 000���,, V1 10 PAVED PATH 9,� at? qp Nm. e'sDR !m � ---- -- -"-- - "' {� 1 T$ ." 1r wloE CATe FOR `�8•CL52 •Y/ "1g•F' I` 3&B - P \ ACCESSTOPONDNLETS .P-W SMH pB 13 I ;I \ 3 I `` FM--� - - 1T+00 _ g 1 \ ,d \ FFE.3BI0 ' CAPANDTHRUSTBPOCKPAS\+ `� ` �O • ]\� ; ¢ /1• S P" \\\E.3Bl.s 1\ III GATE VALVE •SR PVC CB Yd« Ip ` \ ; \ `& 9 1d.8pPRc=\ �///1\` / / i \ 3w_ / -�___\ Ba9A 1 -s e m 72 \\ 1\ \ j�VI .�'• /- \ R / 15' WIDE NERSY EASEMENT TG- • M 1 I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1 COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW m DRIVEWAY TO EXISTING HOUSE WITH 1, ,, 6• SDR35 PIC SEWER TYP __ _ - �•1 { I � I - I 1 1 HOMEOWNER, PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 1W n 8 " FFE~38A.] / GRAVEL SUBBASE AND 2.5' TYPE III PAVEMENT i 314' TYPE K' COPPER WATER 1 \ 1 -•\ 1 11 /(11 1 S BFE=.v(15.2 I / , • ( SERVICE & CURBSTOP, TYP. CB 1 PE f 1 m \ 1 / 1 5 1 24- PE WITH E.S. / 1 33 W INv=aB3so ( I { 32 1 ,W FIFE .3B3o I / w 11 1 T) eFE.3&1s n lI - ry 41 YT FFE = 393,60 \ FDMH BFE • 385.3 pVC - NB , \ 1 \ � - B• Boxss -FD-I \ \ CLASS 2 WETLANp 5 a FF II EXIS\ �, / ' . � - - / \ 50ST(TYP7 1 / 1..� \ I __...__ ._...�T ,1 � S qFE . 383.5 I 1) NEW d' N • 38d.B7 T D1S � s \ ' 1 � I ' 8- IN r $ 1 7�8 I \ I I </ 31 EXIST. HOUSE ,3 1 FFE = 385.0 / D \ w \" BFE = 385.5 STA. 24+00 �" B4\ MATCH HLINE i 40 4 I SEE SHEET 3 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES FFE= 303SO CATCH BASIN DATA 1 BFE- 385a SEWER MANHOLE DATA CB#1 CB#5 CB#70 SMH#1 SMH#4 STA. 10+87, 17 LT. aa••EE••LL I I I - I STA 13+80, 17 RT. STA 20+15, 12- RT. STA. 11+50, CL STA. 15+50, CL 1 1 I { I D 6 RIM=380.30 RIM =38935 RIM =38725 RIM=389.91 RIM =38887 1 S 1 1 \ I,, + I FFE • 38515 $o 15 IN DIN =384.80 8"UDIN•385.35 8"UD IN=38325 8"IN=383.28 a"IN=381.08 39 w �_ // ;, \ \\ \\ \I 11 -l1 MH a7 / BFE=3�80 t 5' IN = 384.70 - - C8 # 11 STA. 14+00, CL STA. 20+33.14, CL , \ / " \ g '\ FFE. Y a \ \ \ \� \D- 15' OUT = 384.65 6" UD OUT - 386,35 TWIN = 383.05 8' OUT = 383.18 8. OUT = 380.98 1 _ 37 35 1 \ 1 1 FnsN EI- �f / 1 15' IN = 385 15 15' OUT = 383.00 15" OUT - 385 10 SMH #2 SMH #5 I s 3SPE B3 eo \ g 1 w STA. 10*67, 12' RT. CB # 6 STA 20+15, 17 LT. RIM = 389.62 RIM = 387.64 g 1 1 \ 1 / 171 y RIM =386.30387.251 s \ \ 1 30 STA 50+50, 11' RT. RIM = (2) 8" IN = 381.93 8" IN = 378.51 I ( 1 \ 1 I { FFE • 395.p (2)6"UD IN=389.95 RIM=3B9.10 6"UD IN=383.25 8"OUT-381.83 8"OUT=378,41 _ 1 ,N \ \ 1\ ITT 24' y 1R BFE•385.5 15'IN=384.95 6'UD IN=385.60 15'011T=383.25 1 L 1 FpCO \ l \ 3 I REVISIONS ISLE BELOW, LEFT) 15' OUT = 384.80 6' UD OUT = 386.10 SMH #3 SMH #6 R' \ B \ INv=389.80 i 1 11 15'IN=3B5.40 CB#12 STA, 53+00, CL STA. 22+20.34, CL ` o ITTy �• J SEE SHEET 3 THESE PLANS WITH LATEST R[w5HIM5 SHOULD F Of CB # 2A x \ f - pp- - s / 1 \ 1 I IA ; ONLY BE USED TOO THE RIRPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS RIM = 388.00 15" OUT = 385.35 STA. 22+10, 12' LT. RIM = 391.65 STA. 18+24.48 CL \ - - _ -` \ 1 15"OUT = 385.10 RIM =389.20 6•IN•384.18 RIM=389.78 s \" >1- ( I I SKETCH/CONCEPT CB#7 6"UD IN= 8"OUT=384.08 8'IN IS)=380.26 _ Fp - / 1 .1 .. 1 ill - -�- EI PRELIMINARY STA. 50+50, 11' LT. ?`; r CB#3 6"UD OUT 8"IN (W)=379.81 1 ... 38 - -- S / FINAL STA. 12+17,12'LT. RIM=389.10 18"IN=383.65 8"OUT=379.51 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT&GRADING NOTE: 6"UO IN-386.60 \ 3 THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT. THIS 0 RECORD DRAWING RIM=391.05 24"OUT=383.60 \ FE•3Bd.3o \ B"UD OUT=386.10 FOUNDATION DRAIN MANHOLE DATA FE=388.8 .p �, PERMIT REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND pr0j. nD (2) 8" UD OUT = 387.05 I I I 36 ROOFTOP GUTTERS (IF INSTALLED) COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP SPEAR MEADOW S 14008 (3)15"IN=384.05 15'OUT=385.80 CBa 13 FDMH #4 FDMH #7 w FFF = 39n eo DISCONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET 15. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION 15"OUT=384DO STA. 22+75.12'RT. FITM=392.5 RIM=387.0 `\ BFE=Sea.:+ I, survey DETAIL APPLIES TO THE REAR HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR CB#8 RIM=IN= 8"IN/OUT=383.25 26"IN=382.30 / A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D CB # 3A STA. 16+84, 12' RT. 6" UD IN = (% � it ,I UNITS 28-28. 28-31 & 33-37. 8. OUT = 382.30 1 1 ST0. 12+49, 41' RT. RIM = 388.00 8' UD OUT = FDMH #5 SPEAR STREET &VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON Asei9^ 15' OUT = 384.30 (2)V UD IN - 304DO 18' IN = 354.05 RIM = 385.75 FDMH #8 J g 1 SNOW STORAGE: ABR 15" OU7 = 383.75 18' OUT = 384.00 8" I WOUT = 387.80 s II SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: rawn RIM = 389.0 \ \ .o - ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN & CB # 4 FDMH 8' IN/OUT = 384.T0 \ _ - ` - zo 1 \ s\ I SIDEWALKIPATH AND CURB A'�R STA. 1369.3 17 LT. CB . 9 CB # 25 RIM = 386.0 FDMH #9 37 - IN THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE checked 6. ED IN=3 STA. 18+8.012'LT. RIM ==383. 6"IN/OUT=383.20 '�9 \ UTILITIES - NORTH 0.1G 6"UD IN=385.35 RIM=388.00 15'IN=383.33 RIM 1 �. \,P7,,,, fi" UD OUT = 386.35 (2)6' UD IN = 384.00 15. OUT • 383.28 6" INIOUT = 382.53 EXISTING HOUSE AND ` - _ I W vg\ • 1 I GRAPHIC SCALE dote 15'IN=384.90 15'IN=383.55 30 0 15 30 6o tzo 15"OUT=384.85 STORM STRUCTURE DATA GARAGE TO BE REMOVED \ (\ I •�j Il O6o106-16 15"OUT=383.50 CB#26 RIM =387.50 STORM TANK#1 TEMPORARY PAVED 1 L i \ LAMOUREUX&DICKIINSON AS NOTED 1 V IN = 382.80 GRATE NORTH = 392.2 TURN-AROIND \ 1 GRATE SOUTH ^6R \ (1. Awl) Ca wltl gEngineers, Inc. 15' DUT = 382.75 _ ` 1 14 Mome Chive ht. no. 15" IN • 383.88 / 1 InG1.308. Essex Jum im VT 05452 /1 15" OUT = 383.83 A9ry_ / - - - I� 04-AI) REVLSE POND WEST INLET GRADING. STORM TATA(PER CRY ABR Tel: 802-8784450 / I 09-13.1] REVISE STORM POND WEST, PIPING, ACCESS, ADD SNOW ST. ABR L SNOW STORAGE: / ) I \} ', i / ( ^ -400"' / -- _ _ _ . SEE SHEET 4 SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: _; i t - ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE�/vE TREES FOR SIDEWALKIPATH AND CURB �,T / -�\ �/ \ \\ it "- -'-----.-, \} /! /� / ^` �` CO RUCTION OF PAVED PATH IN THE THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ON LOT 54 (.. REMOVE TREES FOR / - _ 3 g / - ➢ tea_. _ CONSTRUCTION OF PAVED PATH THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'OIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION ._ . \ \ � „'T �y, PROPOSED PAVED PAT9���^[,�,EMENT \ _ / / �"� ` / �" - _ m ,� _ _ _ 396 - ' Sti •P .,�i�F " s m �. TO CITY OF SOUTH SURLINGTON. __--��� - -- a / BRANCHES ON EXISTING TREE$ SHALL SIDELINE OF EASEMENT SHALL BE 5' BE TRIMMED TO A HEIGHT OF IO FEET „9� I WEST OF CONSTRUCTED PATH ALONG THE NEW PAVED PATH- \ \.... .... - ``\ �� , - 39g _ �� _ - - _ END CURB FDMH t / � � � �►^ � -' ': - - a9e�- . � 1� ....... ..396 - .._. _. " � f"' y � e;� •cam T 54 ti -- \ C �F S i' 1 30 i0' PAVE- PAT" 4 - PROPOSED 15' WIDE SIDEWALK 9 h �� 213Sx / l ` _EASEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTH r r'� I .a/ / - '\� - 26- )0 BURLTNI GTON o y0 .. . _ _ .._ _.. .. .. _ __ :._ .....72 _396...(-_ _ , _ .. ,'" 12 A I j 11 I FFE=399.50 1 b/ - I'a^GEC "'p',�,. � D9v BFE=390.0 _ -- `�p` - _. �. .._. A`r. f _ r __ _�. _ ..'--. _�. '"-'j I . Nng - j I •_. I I � ._ _.'� 9 FFE1=Q396.]- .._ I ♦C3O9P]PB5E0F2E+ WA3'T6E9R] .` I I �. _ _.'.-s�>=_ _ _ -_ --;j� / // / /� BFE.3" 20LO5/// 1 =N eoeFE3e ,9.i IF-B 14 BFE=39B_VPFE 395.00 19 ,3 w� C #/ ma/^ / 1 TYPE'K' I _ -FD- FDMH TYPICAL Y4' i fi FFE.396] a j 3�`L.- u 4y I I E 3955 I BFE=36fi.7 ' F-„ - diE=3660 I _-" ,-i q II - --F0-' p rt - 5' CON RE1E $IDEWW K 62 1 W TER - _ - w h 5`L6 5 - 16 17 18 H a, BFE=368.25 N m na TYP. EWEIR N � � � 5CONGRETE SIDEWALK VO / Z w d#15 S•50R34 C 1 _19. PE as - '^ W L _ n 3 -- 3. I Ii#1 i 3 �96 Q 39x s A° A ( CB#23 CB#t4 =Lu Z a. yc I I .aI II "1 �� 5pfr n�\ I BC#BB21tt3 SMkH6#10 '3 15"FE __ 323*sfio /._ a� CLASS 2 WETTANO 22 FFE=30 0 w 27 S396TTFFE.924 __ - BFE =39&.70 396 394 (1 GJ 29/ I I FFE=398.70 396 BFE=389.2 I DEPRESSEDC-um - I FFE 1395.7 I BFE=389.2 _ / - BFF' 386.2 I 394 3%1 394 26 y 392 'F+ \ f ♦ / 30 392 � 10 - / FFE.395.0 o I SEESHEET2 I BFE=305.5 a ` s9o---� _ �,O 39o�y�---_�` LOT51 �_ Fy��r _ \ f' _ gg0- LOT52 6'SDR35 PVC SEWER, TYP. )/ J- 6'SDR35PVC-F�_L_-/ -- Be PUBLIC OPEN SPACE NOTES: 28 +- - 4- SB h� COORDINATE THE HORIZON AL LOCATION OF THE WATER. SEWER, AND FOOTING DRAIN 392 I y, _ - T WIDE GRAVEL PATH TO SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO EACH BUILDING WITH THE OWNER AND ARCHITECTURAL J r 30 FOCO INV.=36].9 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLANS 390 r _ -FFE- -/ y (SEE CROSS COUNTRY Be }I PATH CROW SECTION) 2, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE ELEVATIONS OF THE SEWER AND FOOTING DRAINERVICES FRCM THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL SE COMPAREO TO THE ELEVATION OF THE a C R COLLECTION MAINS AND SERVICES SHOWN ON THEE PLANS. REPORT ANY END DEFINED CHANNEL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER. 3. COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF THE SIDEWALK ENTRANCES TO EACH BUILDING WITH THE _ _ P I OWNER. UNLESS STEPS5% PROPOSER THE MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ANY SIDEWALK IS &%. SLOPE$ GREATER THAN AN 5%MAY REQUIRE A HAND RAIL. INSTALLATION OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES. /�\ 4. DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE END OF ALL SIDEWALK AND _ _ I/\.✓-)) PAVED PATHS, MID AT CROSSWALK RAMP$. DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES SMALL BE CLASS 2 WETLAND CAST IRON. FOR PAVED PATHS, A SEGMENT Of CONCRETE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR K 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STUBS BEYOND PHASE LIMITS FOR FUTURE EXTENSION 8'WIDEBOARDWAL _ 11 &WIDE WETLAND INTO OTHER PHASES(SEWER. WATER, STORM, UD, ETC.). ACROSS S. COORDINATE UTILITY MAINS AND SERVICES WITH THE DEVELOPER AND UTILITY COMPANY. STANDARDS. 7. NEW STREET LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES$HALL CONFORM WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS CATCH BASIN DATA Be SEWER MANHOLE DATA �) SMH #7 SMH #10 CB # 14 CB # 17 CB # 20 CB # 25 BOARDWALK CONCRETE STA 24+$0, CL STA. 31+50, CL 03-13-1 ] PATH TO BOARDWALK THRU WETLAND IN OS. ADD SNOW ST ABR 392. RIM390, RIM -392.10 RIM =393.90 12" OUT - 389.50 RIM =394.30 REVISIONS STA. 25+00,12'RT. STA. 26+78,75,12'LT. RIM STA. 34+50,12'LT. LEGEND 1 '� ABUTMENT&BACKWML 8"IN=381.48 8"IN=385.26 6" LID IN=388.10 6" LID IN=389.90 NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE 8" OUT = 381.38 8" OUT = 385.18 CB # 21 (2)6" UD IN = 390.55 .,y, THESE PUNS WITH LATEST RMSIONS SHOULD i OF 8" UD OUT = 389.10 6" UD OUT = 390.90 15" OUT = 390.55 4-FD- - - - �- - - - -FD- - - NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE + ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 15' IN = 387.40 15" OUT = 389.40 STA. 31+30. 23.6 RT. ' �;; SMH #8 SMH 18"IN=385.25 RIM=382.50 Cg#pq - ___�=_______ NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE&UNDERDRAIN 1 \^^\ 0 PRELIMINARY SKETCH/CONCEPT STA 26+50, CL STA. 33+00, CL 18" OUT = 385.20 CB # 18 (2)6" UE IN - 389.00 STA 34+50, 12' RT. RIM = 394.00 RIM = 395.86 15" IN = 388 65394.30( 1 8' IN = 382.58 6' IN 386.10 STA. 28+98, 12' FIT. RIM = 490 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR CB#15 RIM=395.80 15 IN l / ,^ FINAL 8'OUT=382A8 8"OUT=38600 (2)6^uow=3eo.bo M I �, �,., y p RECORD DRAWING STA. 25+00, 12' LT. (2)6" UD IN = 391.80 15" OUT = 388 60 IS" IN = 390.40 T W NEW WATER MAIN & HYDRANT i \\ / �� _ STA. 29+29. CL 6 i UD INSMH = 388.10 15" OUT =8387530 CB # 22 15"OUT = 390.35 'A6 FM NEW FORCEMAIN ) `�Y,,' \ / - 1r4008 RIM -396.00 8"UDOUT=389.10 STA.31+30,12'LT. - - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE - / ���/// �/^ SPEAR MEADOWS 8" IN = 384.08 RIM = 393.00 _ _ / 1 survey 15' OUT = 387.60 CB # 19 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 8" OUT = 383.98 STA. 30+21, 12' LT. (2)8' UD IN = 389.00 / I 1 / \ A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LS:D 15' OUT = 388.85 - - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE ,-- -, ._- - _ design CB 11116 RIM = 38a.30 I LOT 52 SPEAR STREET &VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9" STA. 26+78.75, 12' RT. 6' UD IN = 390.30 t PROPOSED STREET LIGHT \^ / - j ABR RIM = 393.90 6" UD OU7 = 381.30 CB # 23 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE �' raven FOUNDATION DRAIN STA. 33+00,12'RT. EXISTING TREE LINE SITE PLAN & ABR 6" UD IN = 388.90 12" IN = 386.00 MANHOLE DATA 6" UD OUT = 390.90 15" IN = 388.DO RIM = 395.50 -- - - - - - - 390 -- -- -- -- --- -- -- EXISTING CONTOUR 5 checked FDMH #1 FDMH #3 15.., 5" IN (E) = 389.20 15" OUT = 387.95 15" IN D389.60 391 WETLAND BUFFER 1 RIM=397.0 RIM=3955 15"IN=(W) 6.15 0 1V OUT WETLAND BOUNDARY 1 UTILITIES - SOUTH DJC 18" OUT = 388.15 dote 6'IN/OUT=386.50 8"IN/OUT=384.50 W EXISTING WATER LINE GRAPHIC SCALE 06-06-16 FDMH #2 FDMH #8 S .J S- EXIST, SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE 30 0 15 30 60 120 stole RIM = 396.0 7" RIM = 389.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT & GRADING NOTE: Y UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE 6" IN/OUT = 385.70 6" IN/OUT = 384.20 THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT. THIS PERMIT LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND ROOFTOP -X X- EXISTING FENCE C6esuTHng Engineers, Inc. ht. no. GUTTERS (IF INSTALLED) COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT Lm reel) 14 M.c Drive ON SHEET 15. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL APPLIES TO THE REAR E.WX JunctiM VTO5452 HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR UNITS 23-26. 28-31 & 33-37. T.I. 802-878M50 3 �1 0 \ ` 3 - _.. __.. _.. . ` •- �. ` of 0.44 390- Lf-- B" - 786 I\ -- \\ \-' PATH LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE \ EXI5 FEET) WITH FINAL DESIGN TO AVOID EXISTING TREES ALONG HEDGEROW. - �'- l 1D PAVED PAT" TY _-----NSw g•�I.SI DIWATE W ass_ itl PAVED PATH- - _ �. _ ~ \ _ . _ ... _ _�� .}('f+ W CL52 DI STUB FOR FUTURE USE, w �' •� \ LOCATIONIMAT BE CONFIRMED WITH _ \ \ UVM AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. _ �8. CL52 DIWPT�1 ." SIT TNT J 'WIDE UTILITY AND F T E CIN OF SOUTI 37d 8' CL52 DI STUB FOR FUTURE USE. \ TYPICAL21W-3'CAL.HARDWOOD �,� LOCATION TO SE CONFIRMED WITH \\ TREE, TOTAL OF 14 TREES. SPECIES TO UM AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. TAPPING INCLUDE SARGENT CHERRY, COMMON SLEEVE VALVE �HATCKBERRY,SKYMASTER ENGLISH OAK TT LEAST40FEACHSPECIES) �\ `EXISTING 24' V CM HIGH \ SERVICE TRANSMISSION MAIN PLANI � / I I � GRAPHIC SCALE 3o D u 3o eo 1zo Un laeq 1 I- • 30 ft. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE CROSSINGS, •.\ _-... _ V SDR35 PVC SEWER, TYP. _ 1 EASEMENT ^,. _. _........ ._..364.... _... _. .. ... ...., IRLINGTON , - IMNAGRIC Y4-TYPE X' COPPER WATER AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE LT RALYERCOLLONT EGE ,yea_ SERVICE SERVICE&CURBSTOP. TYP. N'F \\I _ I ` ' SEE SHEET 2 2DF F CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN } \ PIT__ _VALVE 1 SEWER PUMP STATION EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK I - X - 1_01 PAVED PATH - J..Z 39� - j., ` \ ` 390- CB BMH S 8'SDR35 PVC hC CBnt I � 9 T 382� I I I STORMWATER POND I � 1n1 WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS' UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEW WATER SYSTEM TESTING, FLUSHING, AND DISINFECTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON OLIVIA DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET, CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON NOWLAND FARM DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET. THE PINNACLE AT SPEAR NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE FED BY THE NEW WATER SYSTEM THROUGH THE SPEAR MEADOW LEGEND HE RHOOWITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE WORK, CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE WATER DEPARTMENT ON —S -(P S— NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE THE SEQUENCING AND EXECUTION OF THIS WORK IS CRITICAL TO ITS SUCCESS. THE CONTRACT SHALL PROVIDE ADVANC€NOTICE TQ ALL USERS TH6T'*ILL BE AFFECTED BY ANY TEMPORARY SHUT _ _� _ - NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE DOWN TO ACCOM LISH THE PROPOSED WORK. THE CONTRACTOR -SWELL COMPLETE THE ABOVE WORK AND RESTORE ALL \ \ - `-'400 �' \ // _ �_ _ /�� / ` ` - --_' - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = NEW CATCH BASIN PIPE & UNDERDRAI N DE CONTOUR DISTURBED AREA TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BE74Ek THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS. / _ , �-- - _ NEW WAFINISH TER MAN & HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UO CLEANOUT - ..- - .. _..... / INV • - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE PINNACLE AT SPEAR EXISTING LIGHT TO BE REMOVED I EXISTING TREE LINE 2) UD CLEANOUTS COOND WITH CITY AND MP I 390 - - - " ""' --- -' EXISTING CONTOUR INV 383.8 RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT I WETLAND BUFFER n - _ - W CL5 ER 1° a c_ '\ _-. -_ .._ ._..-396... \ _ ExCA AT 0 oR O N OF EXISTING r I /` WETLAND BOUNDARY g ry T fl _ 1 OI P �O AT _ TO RDETEXIRMNIE EXACT LOCATONSTING Y .... I NEW ST EXISTING GRADE I III I S S r Pt * H'AT N W �. ADJUST EXISTING SMH TO EXISTING WATER LINE v� B— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE& SEWER LINE %rrt 3SS I :I UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE NEW 8' GATE VALVE , ` \ /� } -X X— EXISTING FENCE - - -� - - EXISTING IDEw � - - - - - - - - � EXISTING CATCH BASIN &CULVERT TO BE REMOVDl) A ~� - � EXIST. CB p / k'' - —` s c 3 S B•.CLS2 D1 WATER @ 384 `� ~ w / =55TRRA1VJ"EW / 3 SiDEWIALITNAMP / I Cy 3S>< 39 / 3 I HE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IST. o0 } / I m B - _ DIGSAFE' PRIOR 70 ANY EXCAVATION INV •D3B3.8 NOUTS - ` u*oD SEE SHEET 3 "" Q/ _ ` VALE i°� i(ll }/I 1i /1 -^•;\ // _... I� � \ � � •,I A DRIVE 24- PE E.S.WCATCH BASIN DATA PROVIDE rtT)OejTINGvncOj POTELfUTUREDR1VECLASS2 WAD EXISTING PAVEMENTJCURILAD ND}/L IWA(OUgU-DE REMOED GRAPHIC SCALE D 15 3D 12D On WT MINE 1 incA = 30 fl. CB # 26 EXISTING CS #29 STA. 40`47, 13 75' FIT. STA. 40.50, 19' RT, RIM = 394.80 EXIST RIM = 394.52 6" LID IN - 390.80 NEW RIM = 395A0 CONSTRUCTNEW 12"OUT =389.25 4' DO IN=390.52 /396, SIDEWALK RAMP EXISTING LIGHT CB # 27 STA. 40-47, 13.75' LT. 4" FD IN = 390.82 NEW 12" IN = 389.00 TO REMAIN RIM = 394.80 12" OUT = 388.57 _ 6" UD IN - 390.80 J 12"OUT = 390.25 EXISTING CB9 •_, . CONSTRUCT DRIVE BETWEEN NEWT STA..F1JM \�-- STREETANDEMSTINGDRIVE. COORDINATE WITH HOMEOWNER EXIST. RIM = 394.84 394.8 (MINIMUM1WGRAVEL SUBBASE _- NEW RIM-395.45 J AND 2.5' TYPE IV PAVEMENT) ___ _ ..._ ._. -" �' �-�� � _.. d" UD IN = 391.69 --1 / 4" FD IN = 391.54 NEW 12"IN=390.00 12"OUT=389.64 SEE SHEET 3 FOR NOTES THESE PLANS WITH LAIFST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHDW11 BELOW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pra J. no. 14008 Trey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR SITE PLAN & UTILITIES ABRn PINNACLE AT SPEAR & DJG ked X-COUNTRY WATERLINE d01e 06-06-16 LAMOURF,Ugi & DICKINSON stole AS NOTED CYuIHng Englneen, Ine. l4 M%lorse Ddve ht. n D E— J.-i- VT OM52 Tel: 91 4 PSTA = 10+92.33 tar vcPIA PVI ELEV = 388.18 PVT STA = 12+22.21 im. VC PVI STA = 16+64 A.D. = 5.00 PVI ELEV = 392.08 PVI STA = 13+50 �g K-1800 A.D.=-4.73 p PVI ELEV-389.87 PVI ELEV=388.30 BO'vc K=21.14 m " A.D.=1.23 A.D.=1.25� V K=81.32 Kso'VC15 �w 3B4 n U rd r N 394 —___— — — — FINISH — BADE N 390 -0.50% FINISH GRADE 388 388 FROM CB #2 OITTLET TO UTLET T FIR CB #5t 388 TO CB #1 $ TER PON T CB #4 ` — _ _ _ _ _EXISTING G_ROUNp �' WIPE S 058 fi/FT X E 3Tl/yG OUTLET O 386 S = 0.005 F'T/FT �� S • 0.OD5 FT/FT IW GROVNO Tv I STORM TER POND 384 II 8-C FROM CB #6T CB#5 ��� _ —�� I /FF� 384 250- SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT 382 382 FROM SM 7 380 275x8 SDR35 FNC S 380 378 N 378 376 376 TYPICAL STREET FINISH GRADE ELEV TION 97'4.OH7 374 `a 'rgg� � ir`I e %Q N N n n_ r°gi rei e� PS i� 7H $ gn yn .3 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 nwo 18+00 REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY 9E USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL L RECORD DRAWING Q SPEAR MEADOWS pro} no. m ;`,°°8 U A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D L) "' SPEAR STREET R VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design = E ABR Q. PROFILE CABIR ed SPEAR MEADOW ROAD f ;e GRAPHIC SCALE 06-06-16 30 0 15 OU W scole LAMOUREUgi & DECKINSON AS NOTED Ceesulting Engineers, Inc ht n n Qn Me1) 14 Morsc Drivc 1 Fxh = 30ft Essex luoclion, VT 05452 Tel: 802-8]&4450 5 CENTERLINE ROAD 39B FINISH GRADE d 398 d y 396 h ^ a F Y 388 n _ y m 1.00% 394 N 394 r i m EXISTING ; t117 m GROUND 392 FROM CB #17 d d CENTERLINE RDA °J i s u - ------ -------- 382 h h FINISH GRADE , - ------------ 390 FROM CB #15 - - - a O TO CB#14 ----------- 390 388 _ ---'� 6" CL52 DI NATER 388 EXISTING = __ --- -� - -- -- _ ---'' -- � S•0.005FTIFT 21n15"PE 386 - - S • 0,005 FTIFT 179'x18' PE FROM CB 11 _ --'' �' S = 0.0051 FTIFT 366 2261c18" PE - FT ^S = 0. 51 FTIFT 364 BBY e' PE II 1 Dk15" PE -- V S = 0.008 FT/FT _- 276' 8" 3DR36 PVC S 0.005 FT/ 354 "CL52 DI WATER 382 qqxFr 35 PVC S • 0.005 FTIFr OUTLET TO 382 OUTL ETT. STORMWATE POND 223k8" SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT 380 STO WATER POND 19318' DR35 PVC S = 0. 5 FTIFT 380 378 FROM SMH 04 378 TO SEWER PUMP S7 kTION 376 TYPICAL STRE TCENTERLINE 376 FINISH GRADE DATUM 6L6V 374.00 374 9 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+DO 24+00 25+00 26.00 27-00 28+00 PVI STA = 31-35.69 PVI ELEV = 396.26 PVI STA - 34+50 PVI ELEV = 392.98 A.D. = -3.25 PVI ELEV = 394.39 tar vc A.D. = 3.49 K = 30.77 100 vC A.D. = 2.50 � g PVI STA = 29-00 K = 28.62 K = 40.00 44 + PVI ELEV = 396.50 9+ g �• A.D. • -2.48 1ar VC ar VC K = 40.10 ai `��' "� m n T CR d 398 U N U j F V 398 >LU 396 Q ", 1.49% U tl u i H-Aol- 394 F1N1 c3 U y y 394 U '• F FROM C TO CB #20 19 FROM CB #25 rn i _ �' i - ; 1 392 --�-�-- - TO CS#24 Zi a - - - -- -------- - FRO CB#22 392 Ur 390 --- --- -- - _ �- S 0.005 FTIFT _150'z15" ------ IT II _ _ �- s-o.00s /Fr 18ox+ --- ------ -- --- 3sD GRAPHIC SCALE II S 0.005 FTIFT 118'815" E V 8" CL52 30 0 15 30 80 388 0.005 F7/FT 120k15" E pl WATER 8" CL52 DI yyA7ER 388 Im renl 1 Inch " 30 e. 386 _ 388 21 �- 6 8" SDR35 PVC S 0.0050 FTIFT 384 384 REVISIONS a LATEST D ASHOWN KLOW: 382 F ONLY & USESE FOUR THE SHCEaIS 382SKETCH/CONCEPT m m ' 0 PRELIMINARY 380 i FINAL m 380 1 RECORD DRAWING 378 Pro". no. SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 378 surey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 376 SPEAR STREET R VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design 376 ASR PROFILE ABchecked 374 374 VALE DRIVE DJG c g m o STA. 20+00 - 35+50 dale 06-06-16 tale AS. NOTED eE ng 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33.00 34+00 35+00 C'MuOUR n&�I'KINSON 14 Morac Drivc Eux lunclion, VT 05452 Tel: 802-878-4450 lwvc Q PVI STA-37+50 Y 't PVI ELEV = 398.14 ui A.D.=-2.23 K=44.77 ^ a e W CENTERLINE ROAD FINISHGRADE N F a 398 E Z 388 396 396 394 394 392 3g2 390 390 388 388 386 386 354 354 382 382 380 380 378 378 378 376 374 374 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 VALE DRIVE STA. 35+50 - 41+00 w$ REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / a ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEER � SKETCH/CONCEPT � PRELIMINARY FINAL W El RECORD DRAWING DA3aao J SPEAR MEADOWS 'r4008 survey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D o - SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR ED PROFILE dABR" 60+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 VALE DRIVE 41+00) GRAPHIC SCALE (35+50 - o GNed STREET 'A' 30 0 o so &STREET 'A' date ^c leap LAM DIInc. N !tole AS NOTED n 7a ling Engineers, 14 M. tieg Engineers, Inc. 14 Drive Brit.no ) F.86B.0 -878-44 VT 05/52 Tel: 802-878-4950 7 ee N EXISTIN GROUND i ? II --- --- 2 PE CULVERT � I I 3" CL52 DI Wg7ER EXIST.WATERS I I I I FROM CB W28 70 EXISTING CB SPVCEXIST. B'SDR35 PVC APPROXIMATE EXISTING MAINS LOCATION OF WATER&SEWER LEIS TYPICAL STRE FINISH GRADE TCENTERLINE wa �dV � ON w � N 394 W N Q N 392 392 u 390 GROUNp T \NO ; 3B8 ------� 388 FROM CB #e TO CB W5 FROM CB A7 O CB W8 388 384 ^ 5Y pl WATER 384 r- 301k8' S R35 PVC 382 382 3B0 380 378 `-xm-- 7 AB _ —� > AQH 12 TO / 10 PG �. t �f'Li F.m.�►='� OILam I E /n'ii r i ]Ii�iit \ mI 16 Ell■ �-'r::�' � � '�+ � \ � "_ arl, • D��rii I��_��_��r� �' - ��_ 51 SIB ri •� .e __tPICAL WETLAND _ o v / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC INSET II — � (SEE NOTES THIS B ET) I" .._ _�„#- BB � s( Tcr .—r-^�-,M•. "`" / )/ ,I (- I t 1 � WETLAND BUFFER DELINEATION PLANT LIST Rey BOMnIrnT Name Cnmmnn Name .s'l:< R—A, slmwr I \ I II may- \ // ' _ - ram.. 3 P I I J 9AL I b I _ { ,. s s _� • ••., ' THE WETLAND BUFFER SHALL BE MARKED IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN WITH ONE OR MORE OW OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: - BOUrr R IL HAVINGA MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 3B'AND A MAXIMUMSPACING OF 12 FEET O.C. �FENCE \ -REER BIRCH WIN TERBERRYSHRUBSACI SPACING .C. TREES -RIVER BIRCH TREEB It'-1 12' CALIPER) AT A SPACING of 12 FEET O.C. t/ AF A 1 Horn Blum' Apum Blex Mapk 2 l. O.3'l xRn 6 b Inn AL I gn' Bivaeinh 5 I 2 f2 ' AN ! SI no Gla' Sbmx Glm Maple 2 0 xa U.nf nn C" C r°I C`"""'"'H"kn.ny 2111 xax nrolbn m GT 41nN n u'Nu(Ea' Hwpyla<w 2 2 Eau, n fool bn n' nn I NS Tgeb 'I fax nTnxbm<n v„m,,.. xxs<nl" sNs<m tTmr> I . uau M1roo bmm�'n h<enl ( � _ i `-- FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS Ga en<.<n, rw6n, sgmp,N: sk nmm.r BnFli,n out - l2 3 L BAR.6 fp nrkrwnn n<i nl LA ob.ue n.n.;,n.u, .n,+ne< A<wl.a<Ameium Elm :II .-. a• c.L xax. n r� nr.m /'/ J1 1 / ` /,-�•+. • / i Ar. 9 UA I I I I '" \ ' 1. AMMIMUM OFIB DECIIXIOUSSHRUBS AND I2 EVERGREEN SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT, THE CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PLANTINGS FOR A BUILDING CONTAINING MULTIPLE DWELLING UNITS MAY BE APPORTIONED MOUND THE LOCATION OF WINDOWS,PORCHES, DECKS. EROFTHE BUILDING OTHER DECKS RETAINING WALLS. MOOTHER SIIE CONDITIONS. SITE 2, PLANTS SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE LISTS BELOW, BASED UPON THE BUIGRLDING5 EXPOSURE. ABS ANDMOF 2 VERGR ENS SHALL BE SELECTED FROM EACH GROUP (DECIDUWSSHRUBB AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS) FOR SUNNY UNITS FACING SOUTH AND WEST TREE PIT TRIM STREET TREES TO PROVDE 6 FEET BETWEEN THE E BRAN AND THE FIRST TREE BRANCH P UNIT TREE TRUNK 7 TyICK MULCH A MINIMUM �OF 6 FROM TRUNK Lenny 7yrn AB Axlr, Mlaourea I mFir EpM1fllrleM xaf PG BA,wx6rx.n Wh" Spma Ep6fl6nNu IfA11 PS Plmu.roAu. NT' Prc Sp6fl MryM tlAx TA Tllln wrrvlu rn Amenenn Basswood ill3'-3'(YI BRx TO Rmp nn WnWi, N,u ' Nwlbem Whik CSGer rp6fll-IA, Men nr.rr .xm 6: \ 1AA r E APPROXIMAELIMITS OF 2' HIGH 94 TN S EARTH BERM, COORDINATE 3AA P�f WITH LANDOWNER. IAA \1 \ MA I 2 #1317 SPEA FLEET MA _ 100 II I 6 AS / G S PS-1 - J U\ � 4PG / / i / J It I J ' / IN (NEW \.*TRA`NSPLANT,ED // _.. \ \..,E... R-m.. ill S ET 6 PC ` �HEI TH TO REMAI / UTH OF SMH ewrNc.lN•m• I-— T. sM DECn)UOU88NRUB3 C Ilp'S'I nan do l M3 k Iw Ow, oamy Wmm�mrr nxrn Nm.mwr and swn many adlfMln corona su EVERGREEN SHRUBS me mmnni, rol luxper p p3 FOR SHADY UNITS FACING NORTH AND EAST Bomn(cnl Noma DEGIOIE0U5 SNRI l,wrn,N�w ,�M,,,�„r• IM M•an 5'A,.rnt' I NI N 6y M L EVERGREEN SNRI J niprrv„Wlm. PLANT LIST - 1317 SPEAR STREET •V•V v v W CUT AND REMOVE PARE MESH BASKET. CUT AND REMOVE ROPE AND OR UNDISTURBED SQL BURLAP WRAP FROM TOP 2 J OF LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES: LOOSEN REMAINING AFTER PL URLA TIN TREE PIT. LOOSEN TDEVEO BURLAP TO ALLOW _ FOR ROOT DEVELOPMENT. 1, THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THE ROADS AND THE PROPOSED SEE OTHER PLAN SHEETS FOR STREET AND UTILITY DESIGN INFORMATION. UNITS, T BREAK APART EDGE OF PLED CONCEPTS. THE ACTUAL LOCATION PLANTINGS 2. THIS PLAN IS INTENDEDTOPNESENT THE LANDSCAPINGCONSTRUCTED MAY BE EXCAVATION W/SIEOVEL AND BLEND PLANT MI% ADJUSTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION DUE TO THE CONST0.UCTE0 LOCATION OF THE HOMES, FINAL DRAOING, RETAINING DI WALLS, AND UTILITIES. 3 X BALL IN WITH EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE SOIL TRANSTION 1. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT ME TRUNK FLARE IS MSIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 0121-17 1 ADD PLANTINGS AT 1317 SPEAR. REVISE PER AREORIST ABR 2. STAKING REQUIRED ONLY IN SITUATIONS WHERE TREES WILL BE SUBJECTED TO WINDY REVISIONS CONDITIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT ME END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REV19M SHOULD ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW; O/ SHEETS 3. TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER PLANTING I] SKETCH/CONCEPT 4. EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS, TREE WRAP, ROPE, STRING 0 PRELIMINARY AND SURVEYOR TAPE PRIOR TO PLANTING TO PREVENT GIRDLING FINAL 5. THERE SHALL BE NO WATERING BERM INSTALLED AROUND TREES. Q RECORD DRAWING S. PLANT MIX SHALL CONSIST OF ME FOLLOWING RATIO: 3 PARTS EXISTING SOIL. I PART pro} no TOPSOIL SPEAR MEADOWS 1008 ]. TREE PIT TO BE 3 TIMES AS WIDE AS ROOT BALL. survey IT. PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR CRUSHED R0015 AND DEAD OR INJURED BRANCHES A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET 8 VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9" TREE PLANTING DETAIL IABR wn NTS ABR LANDSCAPE PLAN checked DlG dat Ary I Bomniral Nanrr Common Name Snr Remn<ha MA I Mn6u.Ebm! Adams CnNpple 'Ili'Cal. BeB AA ArvnlamWnJnik BNlvnra,Ywn' Red <Fakenmy x xOpnl BAB rtrN,,,,ruIneno-rA.'rvlxnr Nnnn<m wnx«we. eaB e Tel: 802.878- 50 r W90ts- \ WOODS _—`WOODS TVP +— —' FENCE ROUNDT SLOPE _ 1 1 -� // �� '/ CLASS WETLAND MEADOW _ _ — 1 1 -- :. TEMPO RV STA ILIZED ,A WORK EA FOR / ILD ONS 10 VALE D � BU IN C T UCT N a � MEADOW i MEADOW 006 STORMWATER P(SND MEADOW 'E 1 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF REQUIREMENTS; I / 1 WHERE ROOFTOP RUNOFF WILL BE DIRECTED OVERLAND ACROSS VEGETATED TERRAIN OR TO GRASS ES. THE AREA RECEIVING RUNOFF ILAWNCRSWALE)SHALL BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZENOFF. D BEFORE RECEIVING RU -- 2. TEMPORARY DNERSION OF ROOFTOP RUNOFF OR RUNOFF FROM THE BUILDING - O C 2 WETLAND CONSTRUCTION AREA MAYBE NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTIONTO PREVENT EROSION OR MEADOW USED, BUTARE NOT IN PLACE. A STONE DRIP EDGE SHALL FORTHETREATMENT M CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF. THE RECEIVING AREASHALLBE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED PRIOR TO RECEIVING ANY DIVERTED RUNOFF. S. WHERE ROOFGUTTERSWILLN. U L BE PRWIDEO MA7TINENTEROSION. ���------ �— _ 4. EROSIgJ MAKING SHALL BE PLACED AT ALLROOF GUTTER DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS AND J \ /J SHALL EXTEND SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED ONTO A STABILIZED OR VEGETATED SURFACE. 5. EROSION MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS WHERE SURFACE GRADING AROUND THE BUILDINGS WILL RESULT IN CONCENTRATED FIOW. I %AA6S 2 WETLAND ; ' �/T•�T...... 1 ( g \ \ LEGEND CLASS RWETLAND ' / _ '— 1 - 1 ^r/ ` STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT J I �_ MEADOW �� J t T, -. ,_ , • • — TEMPORARY SILT FENCE I / > , .. . I / 1 / -..„ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STORMWATER BASINS SHALL BE USED AS SEDIMENTATION BASINS WRING CONSTRUCTION — 1 1. THE SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE GRADES SHOWN, EXCEPT THAT THE FOREEAY SHALL BE OVER EXCAVATEDTOADEPTH OFI FOOTBELOWTHE GRAPESSHOWN. f STABILIZED STAGING/STORAGE 2. TYPE 1 STONE FILL MAY BE PLACED ON THE BASIN SIDESLOPES TO STABILRE THE SOIL IF VEGETATILIN DOES 1 NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED DUE TO FLUCTUATING WATER LEVELS WITHIN THE BASIN. L S. THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IN THE FOREBAVS SHALL BE MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL ® L \ BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF 2 FEET. EROSION MATTING 1 4. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM THE BASIN SHALL BE POSE DISD N ANPLAN UD LOCAT ON A SLOPE LESS THAN 5%AND MO LESS THAN 50 FEET FROM A WETLAND OR STREAM. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVE COVER. ��� J CB INLET PROTECTION / / • - \ \ / / NOTE: O j / LAWN 9 y „ a EXISTING HOUSE �TO BE REMOVED SR THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MARKED WITH!' ORANGE POLYESTER BARRIER TAPE. CONSTRUCTION FENCE, OR SNOW FENCE, EXCEPT IN AREAS WITHIN W FEET OF A PRESERVED WETLAND OR STREAM WHERE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE USED TO MARK THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 200 (In HM) 1 Mnn .Son. N-20-17 I REVISIONSPERPRELIMINARYCOMMEWT ONDITgNB I ASR REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SIMNND III OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEER SKETCH/CONCEPT O PRELIMINARY FINAL O RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pro} no. 1008rvey su A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR drawn EROSION PROTECTION AND ABR SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN checked dole 06-06-16 LAMOUREUgl & DICKINSON scale AS NOTED CMmesg EBgineers, IIncht 14 Mo1ee Dave no Essex lunclion, VT 05452 / , Tel: 802-B7B�45D 9 D 0. PAVED PATH GREEN', 1 O ' 4" TOPSOIL. 3 1 B n+Ax. s=a.Ga 1 5002—+ 3 1' THICK TYPE N FINISH MIRAFI 600X GEOTEXTILE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) COURSE PAVEMENT 12' THICK TYPE III SASE MINIMUM I2'FABRIC OVERLAP :DARE PAVEMENT 3�4•T0112'CLEAN STONE DO NOT USE LIMESTONE 1W THICK GRAVEL BASE MIRAF1140N FABRIC OR EQUAL 10.S ER STATE SPEC. ]D4.E (S TTON.OS FADE) 6' PERF. PVC SON 35 R 1' S' SEE PUNS CONCRETE SIDEWALK eo RIGHT-0FWAY 4' DOABLE YELLOW LINE T THICK TYPE III FINISH COURSE PAVEMENT I CONCRETE CURB ��� AVTTHICKTYPE BAW COURSE PAVEMENT ENT � � COURSE PAVEMENT / MINIMUM 24' FABRICS 24•TIICK GRAVEL BASE OVERLAP \\` ADP.6RORApT)0SJ5 Fl.NEI 12' THICK SAND SORROW(ASPER 18'MIN STATE SPEC. p]03.03Aj _PUBLIC STREET WITH PATH TYPICAL SECTION NTS 8W WE PLANS 4-GOUBLE YELLOW LINE 1 I W THICK TYPE III FINISH COURSE PAVEMENT CONCCURB COURSEIPAVE PAVEMENT 7�,.M.—AP' BOD%GEOTE%TILE 5=1IJ'rF'PROVEQUAL)RAVBA//R STATE SPEC. W704.06 MINIMUM 24' FABRICJ 1B' THICK GRAVEL BASE OR X]04.05 FINE) OVERLAP (AS PER R.1E SPEC. W]IN.OB OR WI04 OS FINE] 12' THICK BAND BORROW (AS PER 18'MIN--T STATE SPEC. K]03.03A) PUBLIC STREET WITH SIDEWALK SECTION NTS 1/2" RADIUS PRIOR TO PAVING, THE PORTION OF CURBING TO E IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT SNALI BE COATED WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. +r r� /f rPAVEMENT Is' CLASS B CONCRETE 1) CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10' SECTIONS WITH 1/8' JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2) CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF "TERM CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2' SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK) 3) ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI -SPACING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD (APPROXIMATELY 28 DAYS) CONCRETE CURB NTS FAA SIDEWALK RAMP WITH BROOM FINISH SURFACE 5' MINI. L — J 24- o e GRASS STRIP CONCRETE CURB DETECTABLE A WARNING SURFACE SINGLE RAMP ON TANGENT, NARROW OR NO GRASS STRIP SIDEWAL DAMP WITH BROW \A I �/ CONCRETE CURB BOM FINISH ITH (V DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE 9 GRASS . STRIP SINGLE RAMP ON CORNER RADIUS, NARROW GRASS STRIP BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CURB. _OIDEWALK RAMP NTS — 4'-0' 1/2- RADIU� TAPER ]' —a.�; .:•':•�•;i• �: ;;'.t.�• FINISH GRADE IO"J IN. -TAU AT ALL ENDS OF CURB SECTIONS 18'J TYPICAL TAPERED CURB NTS SIDEWALK RAMP qy REVEAL A7 1< M �,t%'�'"`ROADWA7 SUREACE Section A -A "CURB AUNNARr •_6• /uxA ARr MIN. WI H RAMP RamDnG (twKAL ) Section R-B AN SIDEWALK RAMP WITH DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE CONCRETE CURB Section C-C NOTE: THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PLATES SHALL BE CAST IRON. GREEN R i STREET SIGNS TO BE I I PURCHASED FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. �- UBE. 12 CA STEEL TSIGN POST O WATER B, 5' 1' CONCRETE II SEE VTRANS STD T-45 SIDEWALK II FOR POST SLEEVE AND II ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS 4' TOPSOIL. TYP. u1 10"MIN ' STREET NAME $10N rAP .O N.T.S. �. r FOR POSTS POST SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CROW SECTION 45' 5" AREA OF 25 SQUARE INCHES WITH DDLCF EMIT Z Z ` 14-GAUGE41GALVANIZEO STEEL WELDED WIRE NOTES: 1. MILS RAND POSTS SHALL BE PREMIUM NATIVE WHITE CEDAR. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM, ACTUAL FENCE DIMENSIONS TO BE SHOWN ON SHOP DRAWINGS MAY VARY. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER. SPLIT RAIL FENCE WITH WIRE MESH N.T.S. RADIUS CONCRETE CURB DEPRESSED CURB AT DRIVEWAY SHALL HAVE I' RADIUS TO EASE TRANSITION FROM STREET TO 20' I DRIVE APRON INOU3CONCRETE 2' THIIX BTU. OUS\/ITUI SDES TYAPRON OVER1B' MIN.cuss GRAVEL BA "AOT SPEC. /70005 FINE /704.05). A- 2 5' ^ w v A DRIVEWAY APRON & CURB CUT NTS TYPICAL STREET CROSS-SECTION NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COY PUBLIC 'WORKS SPECIFICATIONS, THE 2011 VERMONT STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND THE APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE CURB WHERE IT WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT. 3. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE BASE AND FINISH COATS OF PAVEMENT WHEN THE FWISH COURSE IS NOT PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BASE COURSE PLACEMENT. 4. THE STREET FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5i 5. WHERE LEDGE EXISTS IT SHALL BE SHATTERED TO A MINIMUM OF 2'-8' BELOW SUBCRADE. e. YELLOW OR ORANGE WARNING TAPE SHA L BE BURIED 15- ABOVE ALL GAS, ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE AND T.V. LINES 7. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE UNDERDRANS, THE FABRIC AND GRAVEL, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR INSPECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A LOADED DUMP TRUCK FOR TRAVELING ON THE SUBGRADE WHEN THE ENGINEER EE PERFORMS THE INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER -EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE SOILS AND ADD ADDITIONAL SAND BASE AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER. e. EBIOR M PLACEMENT OF SAND BORROW OR GRAVEL BASE MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER A GRADATION ANALYSIS FOR EACH MATERIAL SOURCE TO BE USED DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED SPECIFICATION. THIS GRADATION ANALYSIS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MATERIAL TO E USED. SUBSEQUENT SAMPLES SHALL E TAKEN FROM ON -SITE MATERIAL IN PLACE FOR GRADATION ANALYSIS BY THE ENGINEER. 9. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD. 10. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE DURABLE MARKINGS (3M TAPE). TEMPORARY PANT MARKINGS SHALL E PROVIDED ON BASE COURSE PAVEMENT. LEDGE REMOVAL SPECIFICATIONS ALL LEDGE BUSTING AND REMOVAL WORK SHALL E IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ROCK, IF ENCOUNTERED. TO THE LINES AND GRADES INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THE ROCK AND BACKFILL WITH ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL, ROCK IN PIPE TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED SO AS NOT TO BE LESS THAN SIX INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE AFTER IT HAS MD. ROCK EXCAVATION SHALL MEAN BOULDERS EXCEEDING ONE CUBIC YARD IN VOLUME OR SOLID LEDGE ROCK, WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, REOUIRES ITS REMOVAL DRILLING AND BLASTING. WEDGING, SLEDDING. OR BARRING. NO HARDPAN, SOFT, OR DISINTIGRACAN TED ROCK WHICH CBE REMOVED WITH A PICK; LOOSE. SHAKEN. OR PREVIOUSLY BLASTED ROCK OR BROKEN STONE SMALLER THAN ONE CUBIC YARD IN ROCKFILLING OR ELSEWHERE; AND NO ROCKS EXTERIOR TO THE MAXIMUM LIMITS OF EXCAVATIONS BY THE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER WHICH MAY FALL INTO THE TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS, WILL BE MEASURED OR ALLOWED AS ROCK EXCAVATION. IN ROCK EXCAVATION, R IS ESPECIALLY REQUIRED THAT BLASTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH ALL POSSIBLE CARE SO AS TO AVOID INLURY TO PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT ROCK SMALL BE WELL COVERED WITH EFFECTIVE APPLANCES; THAT SUFFICIENT WARNING SHALL BE GIVEN TO ALL PERSONS IN THE WCINRY OF WORK EFORE BLASTING; THAT CARE SHALL BE TO AVOID INJURY TO WATER PIPES, GAS PIPES. SEWERS, DRAINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES; AND THAT CAPS OR OTHER PRIMERS SHALL NOT BEAM KEPT IN THE SE PLACE WHERE DYNAMITE OR OTHER EXPLOSIVES ARE STORED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL LAWS AND ORDINANCES RELATING TO STORAGE AND HANDLING OF EXPLOSIVES. IW MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE TO OVERHANGING BRANCHES, WIRES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS I. — SNOULDER GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1) UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AND MY OR MAY NOT BE EITHER ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY NEW TAP LOCATIONS MMA ID SMALL CONNECT ALL UTILITIES TO NEAREST SOURCE THROUGH COORDINATION WITH UTILITY OWNER. 2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING VEGETATION, PAVEMENT. AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK UNLESS NOTED ON THESE PLANS CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH FROM SITE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY SURFACES. LINES OR STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION AT LEAST EODAL TO THAT IN WHICH THEY WERE FOUND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. 3) SEE OTHER DETAIL SHEETS OF THESE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 4) ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2011 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THESE PLANS. 5) A MINIMUM OF ONE-WAY TRAFFIC SHALL E MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. CONTINUOUS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC WILL BE REQUIRED AT NIGHT. PEAK -HOURS. AND WHENEVER POSSIBLE DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER, MUNICIPALITY OR ENGINEER, A UNIFORMED TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER SHALL DIRECT TRAFFIC DURING PEAK HOURS. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHALL E ERECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND TOWN STANDARDS. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT HIS OR HER OWN EXPENSE FOR ENSURING THAT THE DUST CREATED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR SAFETY HAZARD. WHERE AND WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY. THE CONTRACTOR WILL E REQUIRED TO WET SECTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH WATER, APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE. OR SWEEP THE ROADWAY WITH A POWER BROOM FOR DUST CONTROL. 7) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING ANY WORK, CURING PAVEMENT. BEGINNING THE INSTALLATION OF ANY UTILITIES, BRINGING IN ANY NEW GRAVEL OR STONE FOR THE NEW BASE, PAVING, ALL TESTING, AND FINAL INSPECTION, IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS. 8) PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, ALL MATERIALS SHALL E APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY. 9) ALL FILL SHALL E PLACED IN 6 INCH LIFTS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO 95X OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO 7-99 STANDARD PROCTOR, AMID SHALL E TESTED AT 500' INTERVALS. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10)BACKFILL UNDER PIPES IN FILL AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. THE PIPES SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED OVER ADEQUATELY COMPACTED SOILS. 11)THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL E INSPECTED. MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN PAVED OR GRASSED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTATION. 12)CONSTRUCnON OBSERVATION AND CERTIFICATION IS OFTEN REQUIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS. R IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS DETAILED ON THEE PLANS BE OBSERVED BY LAMOUREUX Q DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. (L&D) TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. L80 WANES ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LABILITY FOR PROBLEMS THAT MAY ARISE FROM: FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE DESIGN INTENT THAT THEY CONVEY. ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS WITHOUT LRD'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT. AND/OR FAILURE TO SCHEDULE OBSERVATIONOF THE WORK AND TESTING PROGRESS. 13)THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT OR LOT CURB CUTS AND PIPE SERVICES WITH THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTIGN. 14)ALL SLOPES, DITCHES AND DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH. CLEAN AND --FREE OF POCKETS WITH SUFFTCKNT SLOPE TO ENSURE DRAINAGE. E MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEPIRANCE BOTH SIDES TO TREES, BRANCHES, POLES, WALLS, FENCES, HYDRANTS, SIGNS, OR SIGN OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. 2 UT BMUS PAVEMENT 1' ITUTYPE INOIV WEARING C0VR3E r112'TYPE II BASE COURSE 1' t_-1-1600X FABRIC OR NOTE: FINE CRUSHED GRAVEL HAVING A DEPTH OF UP TO I MAY BE USED APPROVED EQUAL FOR FINE GRADING ON TOP OF THE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE CROSS COUNTRY PAVED PATH CROSS SECTION NTS pair-. 2Po65 'K"J T""' A4'tl` 1 L µ ••' � ` 0.9Y.fJWJF '4r�.Y.• .i. npy.L.'"'^.' :W4.T^ ..�:5'i :S'::: %t.A. , '�; yy '{,WFNR'p^ ). ''.. 41 a 11 7 7 LK�Va �} ] J A ire 1'�•f.i #. .. ....1 's' ... ,M. „�• , � Y �� cAN,*I.LF.YL1 TrPt, M90.11q+,ys Nr�,L.,RlmrpRl - tCJYT'YJ., aL 71 I'm 7 5. 2�'�Y�Y' g"�� WL f0R 0 BCMLS SP rU�p(t PLC .. ...• �� W E�LEOX SUPPORT DETAIL RV w c AND MULmAL.i wProRn r, {i3 SEE VTRANS STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL J�3 FOR MAILBOX INSTALLATION TYPICAL 4' TOPSOIL AND PLANT DENSE GRASS NOTE: ON CROSS-COUNTRY OLE FRAME R COVER SEWER LINES, RIMS SHALL NEEMAN N844, LEBARON BE A MINIMUM OF 5' ABOVE U— OR EQUAL FINISH GRADE , y x0 PARGNG SE INTERIM F... GRADE BBMWORK m DINTS WITH MOBTM SHALL BE - GROUT MAKE TO RISER ADA6T RIM WITH CONORER RISERS N' A.T.M. C416 MN COAT EXTERIOROFCWO[W M[CASi PEIHFOHCED CONIC MANHOLE WIN FIND (2) COAt6 0 VIAIEVPRDCF SEALANT COME AND RISER Y-D' COPOLYMER -.-ME ASTM (RUNGS NTH 80 STEEL SEE SPECPMATIWS FOR YM IESIMG REWIAEMENI3 RE PYI)R E... CXI OR EWA. IY O.0 O RNC RUBBER MA. T IN ACCORD... �J N AS.T.M. C-N3 AND V m r .Bai 1 m WELOFD SICp MANE FABRIC RECAST ONORR SHELF AND INVERT MST N PLAN VARAME FRXW MINET FOR H STANDARD PAIERTIDNT M.M. UNGTMS LOMi. (M, ALL PIES) D,4,3 k 4 FT.) 2' RIg (MAIL) GIRAxINM CHANNEL sb iCBPEC 201.05 NU I LEDGE 0 DI Lpplq MAIL (2,3 k 4 R.) \ PYIT 1Y or tY PRE E: "BWAUITurCi. IF �. i, \// IGiEIWT.` . ro3,.. /1 °[_ R/FOIL 111i LAG/( 1L DONOT EXTEND ®DING m LOM OF EXCAVATION TYPICAL PRECAST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MANHOLE FRANC k S0LD COVER MTH SI CASKET LABELED 'STpt4' SET FLUSH NTH BASE COURSE PAVEMENT RNISX GRADE ADAIST RIM WTI CONCRETE RISERS ASTM. M26 PRECAST REINFORCED CONC. MANHOLE CONE AND RISER COPOLYMER P VFVOPYLENE PLASTIC RUNGS NTH 1/2' GRADE 60 STEEL REINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL, 12' O.C. 4Y GRAMAAp BAGXfLL FOR STPoUCTIMRES 9HA11 !C APPROVED NATK YATEPoA OR vAARS SPG TOI.OB PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBER BOOT FOt ALL STORM APES 6' m ORDUT FRAME II Rem m DOUBLE LAYER OF SITUMASTC fLENBLE SEALANT AT ALL JOINTS (1 (' WIDTH) -WELDED STEEL NINE FABRIC VARIABLE STANDARD STANDARD LENGTHS (1,2.3 k 4 FT.) A GROUT FRAME TO RISER ADJUST RIM WITH CONCRETE RISERS ALL BACKFILL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED N 6' LIFTS 24 AT 6- OLD. EACH WAY CAST IN PLACE RUBBER CASKET SHALL BE USED AROUND ALL STORY SEVAH PIPES 3. 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. 95 AT 6' O.C. EACH WAY LEDGE PAYMENT UNIT �\ �Ir LEDGE PAYMENT LIMITS TEND BEDDING TO LIMITS OF EXCAVATION / TY LENT 3/I• CLU.. STONE BE.. cRE'i"eDeuaONIXEesl "OAT21 , / / SS � �• �\// N N °' QC 3/1' OIVSNED STONE DECIDING PRECAST CATCHBASIN (YARD) ANe SPEC T04.02B EACH WAY NTS E%TEND SEDOING TO L141i5 Of ExGAVATIDN TYPICAL PRECAST STORM MANHOLE NTS I III RUINSMANHOLE (�) ) MAIL FCOVER NARKED 'SEWER' OR 'STORM' FINISHED (RACE PAVEMENT OR GRASS 77 PROVIDE WATERTIGHT 5-1/4' DIAMETER X 36' CAP I I TALL VALVE BOX TOP WITH A TOP FLANGE. INSTALL 3/4- INSTALL BOX FLUSH NTH FINISH GRADE CRUSHED STONE SUPPORT FOR VALVE MANHOLE CHANNEL oN PLANOTENS BOX TOP TUTS J CLEANOUT DETAIL (STORM & SEWER) TUTS USE PVC PIPE OR PRESSURE TREATED 2' X 4' TO MARK LOCATION AND DEPTH OF SERVICE CONNECTION. E%TEND FROM PLUG TO 2' ABOVE FINAL GRADE PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT IT BOUNOARY 6' MINIMUM SERVICE SON 35 PVC CONNECTION ME RSEVER SEANCE TEMPORARY SHALL RUNUN PERPENDICULAR ERPENDICULAR ) PLUG FROM THE MAIN TO AT LEAST THE STREET LINE HEAVY DUTY ADA COMPLIAN FINISH GROUT FRAME TO CONCRETE — THE FRAME OPENING SHALL MATCH ME CATCH BASIN TOP NTH NO OVERHANG. M1 BACKFLL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBER BOOT FOR ALL STORM PIPES _ 6' OR LARGER INDIAMETER FABTDC --- --I ` SAME ELEVATION 5 FABRIC• UNDERMAIN IN A.S.T.M C470 PRECAST 24• 3. 6 - CL239/4 W.W.F. CONCRETE STRUCTURE 25 AT 6' O.C. EACH WAY 12' UNDISTURBED SDL 6• G"ETI BEDDING TD STONE BEDDING O EXCAVATION NOTE: CATCH BASINS MAY BE LARGER THAN SHOWN ON TNIS DETAIL NO MULTIPLE OR LARGER DIAMETER PIPES IN ONE STRUCTURE. PRECAST CATCH BASIN I 'MINIMUM SLOPE 1/4'/FT FOR SANITARY SEWER OR 1/8'/FT FOR UNDERDRMN PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT UNDE RONAN CA RIER PIPE OR SANITARY SEWER MAN SEE SEVER TRENCH DETAIL 00 NOT CONNECT UNOERORNN FOR SEWER MAIN AND SERVICE TO SANITARY BE YARN BEDDING DETAILS SANITARY SEWER OR UNDERDRAIN SERVICE CONNECTION LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT PAYMENT PRE -CAST OR POURED N-PLACE 3500 PSI CONCRETE RISER BETWEEN C.B. 70P AND BOTTOM OF CAST IRON FRAME. MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE B INCHES. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED. ) IRON FILL GAP 'NTH GROUT ME k ICADE NEW CURB SHALL REST ON TOP 55 OF BASIN COVER - ADJUST HEIGHT OF CURB AS REWIRED WERE MERE IS NO CURB. TOPSOIL AND GRASS TO BASIN AND USE 4 FLANGE FRAME THE 1401 FABRIC SHALL COMPLETELY ENVELOPE THE STONE UNDERDIU N TRENCH ON THE SDES.BOTTCM.TOP AND ENDS FABRIC ENVELOPE TYPICAL I /4 AT 6' O.C. EACH WAY 6' UD C.EANOUT MINIMUM 5' HIGHER —VAF ES THAN00R AS SHOWN ON RAN. 8' LID IN 0 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. i 6' L D. SANITARY & STORM SPECIFICATIONS 1) SANITARY AND STORM SEVER PIPES SHALL BE OF THE 92E AND TYPE INDICATED ON THE PLANS PVC PIPE SHALL BE MR 35 CONFORMING TO ASTM 0-3034, ASTM 0-3212, AND ASTM F-477. CORRUGATED METAL PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO PASHTO Y-190 FOR ACCGMP PIPE AND AASHTO M-246 TYPE B FOR POLYMERIC COATED STEEL PIPE. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M294. TYPE S (9ROOM LINED). 2) AL NEW GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MUMNS SHALL BE LEAN TESTED BY A LOW PRESSURE AR TEST AND DEFLECTION TESTED. THE LOW PRESSURE AR TEST ALL BE USED TO SIMULATE INFILTRATION OR EWILTRATION INTO OR OUT OF ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS. ALL TESTING NLL BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE ENGINEER. MR TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE NTH ASTM CS28-80. THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A PRESSURE DROP FROM 3.5 PSI TO 2.5 PSI SHALL BE 1.2 MINUTES PER 100 FEET OF B. SEVER. AFTER ME ANAL SACKFILL HAS BEEN IN PLACE AT LEAST 30 DAYS, THE DEFLECTION TEST MAY BE PERFORMED, NO PIPE SHALL EXCEED A DEFLECTION m FIVE PERCENT (51n. IF THE DEFLECTON TEST IS RUN USING A RIGID BALL OR MANDREL, IT SHALL SHALL HAVE A DIAMETER EQUAL TO 95I OF THE INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE. THE TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED ATHOUT MECHANICAL PILLING DEVICES ALL MANHOLE AMC PIPELINE MATERIALS, METHODS AND TESTING SHALL BE N ACCORDANCE NTH all AMC STATE STANDARDS AND THESE PLANS 3) ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE INVERT BY THE VACUUM TEST METHOD DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECOICATIWS. FOR MANHOLES UP TO 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A VACUUM DROP FROM 10' TO 9' OF MERCURY SHALL BE 2 MINUTES FOR MANHOLES GREATER THAN 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME SHALL BE 2 MINUTES AND 30 SECOND. H GRADE FINISH CRADC ♦\� PLAN VIEW TUTS f-N�� UNDISTURBED SOIL NTH APPROVED WATER MAN EXCAVATED E%GVAlEO NATURAL N OROHGNLY CONPKIEDB' UNDISTURBED SqL PROFILE VIEW 11FT1 BACKRLLNTH APPROVEDTUTS THE SHOES OTRENCHES s FT, ED MORE IN DEPTH ENIEREO BY PERSONNELACE t12LT COVER IS LESS MANE 1/T, 4' MICR NSULAtEO EHOROU HL MATERIAL IN O6' LIIFTSY COMPACTED H \ SANITARY SEWER =10' MIN. IF THE SANITARY SEWER PRE IS LOCATED ABOVE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WATER MNN $MI L BE CONCRETE ENCASED (SEE PAN BE SNEEZED OR SLOPED TO THE ANGLE OARD, WHICH IS SUITABLE OR BURIA OVER PPE THE SIDES OF TRENCHES nSTORM SEWER 5' MIN. NESHALL O REPOSE 1 NO CASE SHALL THE PIPE LESS THAN 4' O LOVER 4 fT. OR MORE IN DEPTHK STORM OR SANITARY $EWER PPE ROCK FREE BAWRLL DIN 6 HLY OTS(NO IN 6' VER THE CRONN IA IS W19DE AMEIER O PIPE I SHALLB BY PERSONNEL SHALL BE SHEETED ORPLACE OF RED TO THE ANOE O REPOSE - -----t------ iPPROVED f IF COVER 6 LESS MAN 5 1/2'. 4' TRIOf INITIATED BOARD, NNW IS SUITABLE FOR BIPoAL OVER RFC. 18' MTH. 10' MIN. UfTs (NO STONES --a _- 12• -- WATER MAN LARGER THAN 1 1/Y DIAMETER) \ APPROVED ROC( FREE BAp(FLL- DIAMETERO PIPE) TSIDE STORM OR SANITARY SEVER RPEF 1R' MIN. 1v THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE TRENCHES _ENTIRELY THEE O' WRIER COMPACTED N 6' LIFTS (NI) STORES LACER THAN 1 1/2' DIAMETER) \ B• O STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PIPE oC FINISHED UNTIL ALL WORK IS FINISHED \ 10' MIN. 3/1' CRUSHED STONE AND READY FOR BA LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT u e THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE TRENCHES __ ENTIRELY FREE O WATER SINGLE 20' NOAINAL LENGTH OF WATER PIPE IF THE SANITARY SEWER PIPE IS LOCATED ABOVE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WATER UNDISTURBED SOIL DH2 FEET -- 3/8' CRUSHED STONE UNTIL ALL WORN IS FINISHED AND (READY FOR BACKRLLING SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED BEDDING LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT uxq SiuRBEO SQL D42 FEET TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER TRENCH NTS TYPICAL STORM SEWER & DRAIN TRENCH WATER / SEWER PIPE CROSSING NITS TUTS WATER DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 GENERAL: CAST IRON COVER MARKED WATER This item Mall consist of the lobar, equipment, antl material requhod fa the emplete emslructian of the salermaket old seruices which shall Include excowtion, backfilling, Pipe, wlws, tees. hydrants, elboss, reducers. and all other appurtenances moory fa complete wdo—In system as indicated an the accepted drawings. All te ale and installations shall be opprowId by the 1=1 municipal water authwily. 1.2 WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIALS: DUCnLE IRON PIPE Pipe shall be a minimum diameter of eight inches (B') and conlam to current AWWA C600 and ANSI Specificol'kxt A21.51. Push-m joint pipe Mall be minimum thickness Class 52. Pipe Mall be cement mortar -lined an the inside in accordance with AWWA C151.51 or AN Specification A21.4 ept that the cement -Wing IT Mo. Mall not be less Than threw -sixteenths Nch (3%16•). A plus tolerance of me -eighths Inch (1/8') .,It be permitted. 1.3 FITTINGS: Duce iron fillinmen gs Moll be cet-fined, how 350 pounds walking ess king prure, and be in wd cdance with AWWA C-110/ANSI A21.10 and AWWA C152/ANSI 21.53 for compact fittings. Mechanical pint nuts and bolts Mall be high strength, law alloy steel pe ANSI A- 21.11 . Duethe iron fittings larger than l"" inMss (12•) Mall haw I standard poly length equal to Class 250 cost km fittings. Cast iron pass 230 fittings wDl De allowed n lieu of ductile Iron fittings in size forger then lwelw inch. (12•). Megalug retcine glands a an opprowd equal Mall be used an al wiled sends and as Mown an INe plans. 1.4 CATE VALVE RESILIENT SEAT: Cole wlwx Mall be All C 509 Standard Got. Valves with memaniml int. of w requkod an the plans. All Vdw, Moll be or cast a duals, it baddy, panda' bran a,eols, non -rising of—, Inside screw, double disk emetruciian with '0• Ring Stem Seals. All valww to be equipped with D .I. W. fa o minimum of AS' I cover mote,,,. The pale w'ws snail opm left and be designed fa o waking pressure of 200 psi. Each wdw shall how maker's name, pressure rating, and year in Which manufactured coaI on Ina pody. Prior to shipment from the foclory, each wlw Mall be tested ay hydrow . pre,su,e equal to twice the specified waking pressure. Burred wlws Mall be installed with a wlw box. 1.5 VALVE BOXES: Cast iron throw -piss Made -type; five and one-fourth. inch (5 1/4') Mail; is foot (6) Irench depth. Cast Iran town marked "WATER" antl Indicating direction of opening. 1.6 FIRE HYDRANTS NI hydrants ors to be 3-way 5• minimum diameter Old limited to the following makes: Wderms Pacer, Mueller Super Centurbn or Kennedy Guardian K-6ID. and Mail confam with AMA C502. Moil Vdw Opening: 5 1/4 Inches Nozzle Arrangement: TWO 2 1/2 Inch non maid. NST threads One 4 1/2 Inch Pumper nozzle NST threads Inlet Connection: 6 inch mechanical joint. MEGA -LUG and thrust block Operoling Nut Standard 1 1/2• pentogm Direcl'wn of Opening: Counsel«k.we Ca" Enameled hydrant red body, top cola a, determined by Town. Depth of Bury. Hydrant Moll be installed to the monuf«lures, instructions with nOZtln about Ir m.. finish grade. 1.7 HYDRANT BRANCHES: Hydrant re-mb in Man consist of o six IS6•) memonica Ohl got- wlw cmlorming to AWWA C-509: a length of of, Inch (6 ) Clan 52 ductile Irm plpa with D cement -lining: and the IT,. hydrant. MEGA -LUG retainer glands or approwl aqua .all as used Ths hydrant Mall haw at I ... I fifteen (15') between the bottom or the stale sap and the ground. 1.8 CONSTRUCTION METHODS A. INSPECTION AND TESTING AI pipe and 6tUnga Moll be inspected old tested in accordance with the FIT a..facturers spodfkalion. and In. o/aremenllmed AMA Specifications. The Cont ... for •hall IurnlM fa pprowl certification from the pipe manufacture that all tests how been performed with ralMfaaimy results Pipe Mall not be installed Without the Engineer'. or Water Authority" approwl B. INSTALLATION Pipit, fittintceg& and .—.I- Mall be carefully handed to aWd damage. Prior to the dote of oplance of the project work by the Owner, the Conlr«tux Mall replace any new Pipe w occeswas y found to M defecliw at any time. Including after inddiatim, at no expense to the Ownw. NI Installation Old testing Mall ad be done In accordance with AMA Standard C-600 and ANSI Specification AP, I. AI pipes Mowing cracks Mal be re)ected. If cracks occur in the pips the Canlracior may. at Hie own azpenn and with the approwl of lb Engineer, Out all the orackod patfans of a pohi of least '" Inches (12•) from the Nshale limits of the clock and use the sound partian of The ppe. All pipes and fitting. Moll be cleared of all Foreign matter and debris prior to Installotim and Mall be kept dean until the time of acceptance by the Owner. Al all time& When the pipe laying is not actually in progress, the opm ends of the pp. Mall be dosed by temporary watertight plugs a by oche apiwo.a means. If wale is n the lrmm Men work is seamed, the plug Shall mat be turn d untA all Conger of water entering the pipe has posse. The pipe Mall be installed in trenmes and at the In, and grade shown an the Contract Drawfngs. My collection joints shall be within the limits specified by the manufacturer. At piping and appurtenances connected to the equipment Moll be supported Sa that no strain win be imposed an the equipment. If the eq.ip,mt m nufact—r's specifications include that piping load, are not to be transferred, the Contractor sholl submit certification of cemplionce. Concrete thrust block, Shall be installed an all plugs, tees, and bends deflecting 11 con donne. or male. Cale Moll be takm to m.ure that concrete win not came in con, with flange, joint,, a bate. The to area of Thrust blacks ore indicated on the plane or Mall be as alp rowd by the Engineer. Win lewr sewer, crox, now wolermoim, the ederma Mall be told of such an elewi an that the bottom of the wotermoN is at least 16 inches Wow the top of the This vertical aeporatim What be maintained Fa that portion of the watwmom lomled within ten fat (10') horizontally of my sewer it nouns Thwe shall be no physical connection between the distribution system and any pipes, pump,. Hyman, or lank, Mich ale supplied or may be supplied with o water that es, a may be. dent—inatod. In instance. where the us of different types al pipe rm,ke joining, the Contractor Mall Furnish and inside all necessary adopters. All trenching safety standards MdI be h conformance with OR applicable State old eltnes Federal Gudand do apeeifiec an the Plans. The Contractor shall, of all time, keep the trenchn entirely free of water until all wank I. finished and ready for backfilling. After the wr ads pipelines how been Installed, the Iren<hu erne other aloe to be filled Mall De DacklRlod to ,uDgroOa With. whwewr possible, material excawled from the trenm. No backfiing will be allowetl until any Concrete mosonry Has set s.flic ently as determined by the Engineer. All moleriol for backfiling .hall be free of racls, stumps and frost. Material, used fa mckOling Venmaa rise be Ira of simes weighing oar 30 pounds No slann Sasuring ova an and one-half inches (1 1/2•) in ins longnl dimenebn rid' be placed within one fact (1') of the pipolm, being bockpled BOOM Nor all pipelines Mal be placed in Is Inch (6•) layers each lays, being thoroughly compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by the AASHTO-T-99 Standard Proctor. Portiwlor precaulima Moll be tden in the placement and compaction of the backfill motwiol In order not to damage the pipe or structure The backfill M,II be brought up evenly. All w,lermains Mall be installod with a minimum cover depth of Mx (8'). Surplus ex awtm material, not owed la bOCkfll shall be dix,mm o1 ;n Satisfactory to the Engineer. AI surplus material w spoil Mall be rennowd promptlynm and dlepoom of so as not to be objectionable to .butte s or to the genera public. Velw boxes are to be installed an Oil buried Wws. The boxes shall be cost ir with a minimum flux and me -fourth. inch (5 1/4') diameter and Img enough to extend from the wlw to finished grade. The bases shall andose the operating nut and stuffing box of the wlue. Valor bases anal not transfer loads into the wlw. Covers Mall be dose fitting and dkl-light with the top of the cover slush with the top of the box rim. Covers Mail be marked •Water with an w 'indicating the direction of opening. V.I. boxes Mall be three piece alp-tperro The contractm Moll provide a etable, temporary PVC marks approwl by the En9Nae at all gate .Iws, curb slops, and at the end of woterlines to , point six inches (8-) .bow IInIM grods. The marker shall be sealed securely into the ground. C. WELD In Except as otherwise dirmted, all pipMines Mall be tested. Pipelines laid in d c.11on or beaded in crele 0011 be tested prior to backiEling or the placing of rate. and ony .xP..d piping Mall ere tested prior m Held painting. The Contractor shall keni0 all gauge& testing plugs, caps, and d other nec ecry eWipment and labor to perform leakage and Weewre test in section, of an approwl length. Eam wWad secllan a a of we thousand feel (1,000') of the pipe Mall be tested. All water regal ad for tuUng Moll be polaDa. All Nesting snail be conducted in the preaentt of the Enginew. Far the pressure teal, the Contractor Mail deMop and mnhloln 200 pounds per puce Inch for two hours Fdure to hold the designated pressure for the two-hour period conslllutn O failure of the s ollon tested. The leakage teat Mall be performed rtently with the pressure lest. During the teal, the Contractor Mas measure the quantity of water required to maintain the test pressure. Leakage Mall not exceed the quantity given by. SD �— 4 r L 148.000 where: L L«Ira II ge N gal ans/hour 9 S Length of pipeline tested D Diameter of a in inches Pp P Average lul prsesuraln Psi NI testing sholl be conducted in—ardonce with AWWA C-600 latest revision Should any notion of the pipe fan either the pressure cl leakage tuts, the Controctw 0,11 do ewrylhing necessary to 1«ole and Top,, w replace The defecliw pipe, fittings, a joint. at no topense to the Own- D. DISINFECTION: Chlorination of the wateia Mall be conducted only offer the main has been Rushed and o clear stream is obtained 00 detemned by the Engineer. The Contractor Mall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, and loss necessary to disinfect the pipe and appurtenances In ocewdanee with the AWWA Standard for Disinfecting Wotermoins. C-651, with the exception of the tablet method. The method of disinfection Mall be by the continuous lead method union otherwise approved by the Engineer. After III Rushing, and the odditim of chlorine solution, the frn chlorine caneenlrolion within the pipe Moll be of lust 25 mg/I. The chlorinated water anal' remain in the main for o period of at [met 24 hours. At the end of this period, the treated eater in all Milan$ of the main Man not how o residual of Ina than 10 mg/I of Inn chlorine. All d'winfectim Mall be performed under the supervision of the Engineer. The dishfection process Mail be deemed acceptable only offer (2) samples of Water Iron the gushed, disinfected main lake by the Engineer antl tmled t a opprovod lObwolay Mow na evidence of boelwiaogicd conlamh,tim. Disilf-ctim shall conform to the latest AWWA C-651 rewwm. The pipeline and appurtenances ehot be maintained in an uncontwninotad canditim until final acceptance. Disinfection Mall be repeated when and where required at no expense to the Owner until final acceptance by the 0w E. FROST PROTECTION OF SHALLOW WATERLINES Waterlines with less than all feet (6) of cover ova the crown, w Mwe indicated on the plan.. Moll be protected against freezing by Nstollotim of four inch (4•) thick Slyolacm uM SM insulating shts with o total Width of +Our et (4') or twice the pipe diameter, Mimewr is greo er. The Meets Moll be placed six Inches (8') mow the crown of them after cempoction ere the six inch (6•) lift immediately .bow thew Care Mal De a —deed by the Contractor during lb —fill and unp«tiol ova the slpafacm Most.Mls to prevent damage to the Most. St yrofacm SM shoe Mall meet the com,mmli. wtrength rnufrements of ASTM D1621-73 antl WINDS be as manufactured by Dow Chemicol Company. Midland, Michigan, or e t,luelent. in n Wee Mall the waterline haw leas than four feet (4) of Co— over the lop of the pipe. MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK IIN SQUARE FEET) ®®®®®®®®®®M®®®®®® MMMMMMMMEMOMMMME 3500 PS 35M PSI CONCRETE CONCRETE END AREA BEARING J AGAINST END AREA / v UNDISTURBED BEARING J SOIL AGAINST UNIX 7URBED SOIL TYPICAL TEES-DEADENDS-CAPS TYPICAL BENDS NOTE: PLACE 4 me POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK THR UST BLOCK END AREA NTS ALL DOMESTIC SERVICES AND DOMESTIC FARE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO ME PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED ACCORDING TO THEIR DECREE OF HAZARD, WITH A SACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, AND WITH AN APPROPRIATE MERNAL EXPANSION SYSTEM, — GRCND — .A.. L WITH CLEAR MATERIAL NO LARGER THAN 6' EDGE PAYMENT LNAITI SEE WATER TRENCH DETAIL FOR TYPICAL BEDDING REOUIREMF.NTS AWWA C1IO/CISS COMPLIANT DUCTILE RICH TAPPING SLEEVE WITH MJ ENDS WIM END AND SIDE GASKETS PER CAN) SRECDCATIONS- WATER MAN INS. Ncs AND 6' IV ONTO LOT CONTRACTORS LIMIT EXTENSION TYPE CURB BOX PENTACM NUT CAP (TWO I CAPS NOT ACCEPTABLE) I -STARLESS STEEL ROD BALL TYPE CURBSTM 3/4• TYPE Yr COPPER SERMCE DR AS SHOWN ON RAN -LED PAMENT OMIT 3/4' BALL VALVETYPE , 4• X 6' VME X 16• SOLID Da1WOnATCN STOP (AY MODOT OR CAMBPoDDE CONCRETE BLCCK BRASS) WATER SERVICE SHALL RUN PROVIDE COMPRESSION G PERPENDICOLAR TRW ME NAM 10 AT LEAST THE STREET LINE. WATER PRESSURE MST SNALSHALL BE IC THIS PORT. N0 ES, 1. TEFL OM THREAD SEALANT SHALL SE USED ON ALL CORPORATION STOPS PRIOR TO INSERTION. A SPIRAL WRAP COMPLETELY COWITING THE THREAD AREA WITH TWO MAPS. B. PIPE DOPE OR OTHER LIQUID THREAD SEALANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE 2. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL NOT BE PLACED LESS THAN 12• MART ALONG PIPE WATER SERVICE DETAIL NTS Box A— C-50a, COUNTER CLOONVISE OPENING WITH A WORKING PRESSURE OF ISO PSI, PER WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS 3/4' CRUSHED STONE SHALL EXTEND ABOVE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX 3/4' CORPORATION IN FIRST LENGTH OR PIPE FOR TESTING AND CHLORINATION MEW -LUG RETAINER OR AP.GWD EQUAL CRUSHED STOME 12' DEPTH NOTES: 1. NET TAPS SMALL BE PERFORMED Y Y FIRM ONLY B E ME WITH AT R WATER DEPARTMENT.REQUIRE CURRENT O BE F LTE NE NSIRARfE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL Also II PNONDED. 2. TAPS TAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF THREE PIPE DIAMETERS AWAY FROM ANY JdNT IN ME EXISTING RPE IG SE TAPPED. ]. AFTER FINALTNRH AENINGPPLIED AM TESTING ALL BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL O BRUSH COATED WITH NUTSSITUMAND COLO APPLED MATERIAL TO MORDUfXEY COVER ALL EXPOSED SURFACES a ME NUTS AND BOLTS. TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE UNPAVED AREAS I PAVED AREAS INICMNESS OF NEW PAWMENT AT TRENCH SHALL MATCH EESTING THICUIESS. AT A MINIMUM. PAWMENT LEFTS SHALL CONSIST w 2 1/2' TYPE a BASE AND 1 1/2' TYPE W WEARING COURSE PAWMENT. THICKNESS OF EESTNG SUBBASE OR MMMUM O IY DENSE CMDED CRUSHED STONE (Vfit SPEC. —.a.) FIiISII GRADE IN015MRDED SCL BACKFII.L WITH MPROVED�J IW MIN. EXCAVATED MATERIAL IN OUQfE, COMPACTED N 6•UFS ME SIDES OF TRENCHES 4 FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH ENTERED BY PERSONNEL SNALL BE SHEETED OR ; AOPFD TO ME ANGLE OF REPOSE 12' B• SAND SORROW (VTRANS SPEC MO) FOR D.I. APE. F TRENCH — IS WET, 3/8' CRUSHED STORE BEDDING SMALL BE USED. .M MRKD SON �C� PRIOR TO P—G. CUT EXISTING PAWMENT BACK U OF 1 F DVEW EXSTNG SUMASE. EAN A CLND COAT EDDE O EXISTING PAWWNT WITH EKILSION PRIOR To PLACEMENT OF WEARING WILRSE PAWMENT, GLAND EXISTING PAVEMENT BACK A UM or t FT To A DEPTH OF 1 I/2- TO SIACfiR JOINTS N TRENCH PAWMENT PATCH. UNDISTURBED SOL t BOLTED HYDRANT TEE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK 0. SEE THRUST BLOCK SCHEDULE 77 WATER MAN ADJUSTABLE TWO PIECE CAST IRON VALVE BOX TO FINISH GRADE 3/4' CRUSHED STONE SMALLExiEND ABOVE BOTTOM I VALVE BOX MEGA-LLIC RETAINER OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE WATER TRENCH ---✓ —3/4' CRUSHED STONE MINE FOR APE AND W. tY DEPTH BENDING REQUIREMENTS NOTES: 1, TWELVE INHALE DE -) AND SMALL M LL S MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS AWWA REQURE E 15 O CSOB CURRENT EDITOR. VALVES TWELVE INCHES HAW AND SMALLER SHALL E BUBBLE TIGHT. ZERO LEAKAGE AT 200 TWO MORNING PRE59LKE. VALVES ND NU HALE NON-RTRNG All STEMS, OPEN COUNTER 0.0CNMSE AND PROVIDE A TWO (2') SQUARE OPERATING NUT WITH AN ARROW CAST IN ME METAL INDICATING CRECTOR OF OPENING EAdI VALVE STALL HAVE ME MAKERS NAME, PRESSURE RATING AND YEAR IN WIACH IT WAS MANUFACTURED CAST ON THE BODY. VALVES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JCINT ON EACH END. AND SECURED TO ME ADJOINING PIPE WITH AN APPROVED RETNNER HAND. PRIOR TO SHIPMENT FROM THE FACTORY EACH VALW SHALL BE TESTED BY HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE EQUAL TO TWICE THE SPECIFIED WORKING PRESSURE. 2, BURIED VALVES SHALL BE PRONGED WITH A TWO INCH (Yl SQUARE YAHNCH KIT AND SHALL BE INSTALLEDWITH CAST IRON VALVE BOX AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW P09 W ACCESS TO THE VALW OPERATING NUT AT ALL TIMES IN INSTALLATIONS WHERE ME DEPTH IBM GRADE TO TOP OF VALVE OPERATING FAIT 15 GREATER THAN SIX (61 FEET. A VALVE STEM RISER SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED SUCH THAT ME DEPTH FROM ME VALVE STEM RISER NUT TO GRADE IS FROM FOUR FEET TO SIX FEET (4'-61, (MINIMUM LENGM OF VALVE STEM RISER 15 TWO FEET Of% VALW SMe RISERS SHALL SE OFFHIGHSIRENGM STANLEESS STEEL AND OF WELDED CONSTRUCTION. GROUND VALW BOX 6' MINIMUM WATER MAIN GATE VALVE DETAIL NTS HYDRANT MANUFACTURER TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENONEER AND MUST MEET CITY STANDARDS. HYDRANT FLAG I• STORI CONNECTION Ur-21 LEDGE PAYMENT 1� LIMIT MINIMUM 6' BURL 6• GATE VALVE THRUST BLOCK ALL MI GLANDS SHALL BE 'MEGALUG' OR APPROVED EQUAL HYDRANT DRAIN SHALL BE PLUGGED. SEE WATER TRENCH (CRUSHED STONE LEDGE PAYMENT UNIT DETAIL FOR BEDDING 8• DIAL. 0.1E PIPE REQUIREMENTS HYDRANT DETAIL NTS ROL ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN I ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER F COVE. I5 LESSMAR W. R/{E vnlCh 15MSIIUTABLEAFOR BURIAL owe SYSTEMS OWNED BY TH RAMP AIN WATER DISTRICT. THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. RIPE. N NO CASE SIIALL THE APE COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT. AND THE Ins CRROORN.. STAGGER THAN 4' OF COK. ER ,TS 90 VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE MAT NO Tina Jaxrs ARE ONE owe ME oMEE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, - b' IS Tsfix: AWIMR APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE OF PIPE) CROSSINGS. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TINES KEEP THE TRENCHES - ENTIRELY FREE OF WATER UNTIL ALL WORK IS FINISHED AND READY FOR BACKFILUNC BOME ' LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT 1. ALL DUCTILE INCH APE SHALL HAVE 8 ME POLWTHYLENE PER AWWA m / ANSI 21.5 2. A MINIMUM OF 3 BRASS WEDGES SNAIL BE INSTALLED AT EACH APE JOINT FOR W D.I. POE. TYPICAL WATER TRENCH NTS PUMP STATIONDATA A. TOTAL DESIGN FLOW (EPR FLOWS) 47 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS a 210 GPDIUPO NIT S M G INFILTRATION (0.43 MILES z 6' DIA. X 300 GPDANCH DIA /MILE 1.032 GPD TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 10,502 GPDLOSSES STATIC LIFT = 12.0 FEET FRICTION LOSSES = 12.0 FEET MINOR LOSSES • 1.0 FEET TOTAL HEAD LOSSES = 25.0 FEET C. PUMP REQUIREMENTS PUMPS A SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY GOULDS OR EQUAL. USE TWO (2) NON -CLOG SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMPS. EACH RUMP SHALL SE CAPABLE OF PUMPING 130 GPM AT 25 FT. TDH. THE PUMPS SHALL BE GOULDS MODEL 3888N. 1.5 HE THREE PHASE WITH A V FLANGED DISCHARGE CAPABLE OF PASSING 3 • SOLIDS. D. PUMP STATION ELECTRICAL SERVICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALLBE RESPONSIBLEFORPROVIDINGALLM MRALSANDLABOR AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL AND STATE ELECTRICAL 8 PLUMBING CODES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY. ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE 120V240V, SINGLE PHASE. E. EMERGENCY STORAGE PROVIDE 4.15 HOURS STORAGE (PER CITY REQUIREMENTS), BASED ON MAXIMUM DAY DELIVERY RATE OVER 16 HOURS: MIKe GPD 116 HR. x 4.15 HOURS = 2,828 GAL. REQUIRED STORAGE STORAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE ALARM LEVEL AND WITHOUT SURCHARGING THE INCOMING SEWER MANS), STORAGE PROVIDED- 2AU GAL.(1,616 IN THE EXTERNAL STORAGE TANK AND 12n IN THE PUMP STATION). F. SUBMERSIBLE DUPLEX PUMP STATION REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PUMP STATION: - VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE DUPLEX PUMP CONTROLLER - MULTITRODE (FLYGT/XYLEM) PUMP CONTROL - REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT - HOA SWITCH FOR EACH PUMP IN PANEL - RUN LIGHTS FOR EACH PUMP -ALARM LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACK-UP - MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH - DUPLEX CONVENIENCE OUTLETS IN PANEL - ELAPSED TIME METER$ - LIGHTNING PROTECTION - ALTERNATING RELAY a MANUAL SWITCH - TIME DELAY RELAY G. WET WELL LEVEL SENSOR THFLEOECZbRTR0E3FSTEM SHALL BE FLYGTDYLEM MULTI MODE. COMPRISING A MULTI-SENSORED PROBE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MULTITRODE CONTROLLER. THE PROBE SHALL BE SUSPENDED, WITH A STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING BRACKET AND CLEANING SQEEGEE, AND POSITIONED IN THE RISER SECTION OF THE WET WELL JUST BELOW THE ACCESS HATCH, A REDUNGANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT SWITCH SHALL ALSO SE PROVIDED IN THE WETWELL, TESTING DATA A. FORCE MAN PRESSURE TEST'. THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO NOT LESS THAN W PSI AT THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TEST SECTION. THE TEST SHALL BE OF TWO HOUR DURATION AND THE TEST PRESSURE SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN -l-5 PSI. A LEAAGE TEST SHALL ALSO BE PERFORMED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE PRESSURE TEBE THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: L = (S.D. NP) / 133,IOD WHERE L • THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR. $ IS THE LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED, D IS THE NOMINAL INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE %PE IN INCHES, AND P I$ THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN PSI. B. PUMP STATION VALVE %Te EMERGENCY STORAC TANK F4AGE ST'. THE STRUCTURE$ SHALL BE TESTED IN 1HE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER FOR EXFILTRATION BY FILLING THE STRUCTURES TO 1T BELOW THE ACCESS LID. A STABILIZATION PERID OF FOUR HOURS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW FOR ABSORPTION. AT THE END OF THE STABILIZATION PERIOD THE STRUCTURES $HALL BE REFILLED AS NECESSARY AND THE TEST PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL BEGIN. AT THE END OF THE TEST PERIOD, THE VOLUME OF WATER CHANGE SHALL BE MEASURED. LKXUO VOLUME LOSS SHALL MOT EXCEED ONE -TENTH OF ONE PERCENT OF THE TANK CAPACITY (O.W1 z TANK VOLUME). THERE SHALL ALSO BE NO VISIBLE INFILTRATION OR EXFILTRATION OR THE TEST FAILS. IF TINE TEST FAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND/OR WATERPROOF CN THE EXTERIORAND RETEST. A VACUUM TEST (ASTM G1Y1)) SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF THE WATER TEST. A VACUUM TEST WILL BE REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS HAVING A HIGH WATER TABLE, C. PUMP STATION: THE CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL BE PRESENT DURING START-UP, A WATER SOURCE SHALL BE AVABABLE TO PERFORM A FULL OPERATIONAL CHECK OF THE STATION, INCLUDING ALL PROBE FUNCTIONS. ALARM TESTING, INDICATOR LIGHTS, Kor SWITCHES, PUMPS AND PUMP ALTERNATOR. THE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE CYCLED THROUGH MORE THAN ONCE TO VERIFY PROPER SEQUENCING AND OPERATION OF THE PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL Be FIELD TESTED TO VERIFY THAT THE PUM%MG CAPACITY MEETS THE PROJECT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PUMP STATION My REQUIRE TEMPORARY SHEETING AND OR DEWATERING. NECESSARY DEWATERING TECHNIQUES SHALL BE UTILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE ORY SINE CONDITIONS. 2. THE COMPLETE OPERATION OF THE PUMP STATION AND FORCEMAN SHALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TESTING SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS SHEET. THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE RE—NIENTS OF THE ENGINEER, CITY. PUMP MANUFACTURER, AND THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES. 3. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL MEET THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY. TO INSURE COMPLIANCE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SNALL RETAINTHE SERVICES OF A VERMONT LICENSED ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK AND MATERIALS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL PERTINENT CODES. 4. ALL OPENINGS FOR PIPES AND CONDUIT IN THE PUMP STATION AND WET WELL SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEALED AND WATERTIGHT. .i ALL MATERIALS LOCATED WITHIN THE WETWELL SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. SPECIFICATIONS 1. PUMP STATION, VALVE PIT AND EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK SHALL BE PRE-ENGINEERED RENFIXNCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF VERMONT AND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND K20 WHEEL LOADINGS AT THE DEPTH SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 2. EXTERNAL EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK TO BE A HEAVYDUTY TANK. AS MANUFACTURED BY CAMP PRECAST, OR EQUAL, WALL, FLOOR S TOP THICKNESSES SHOWN HEREON ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT FLOTATION. 3. EXTERNALLY COAT ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITH TWO COATS OF BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING AND TEST FOR WATERTIGHTNESS. 4. DUCTILE IRON PIPE JOINTS OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURES SHALL SE MECHANICAL JOINT. JOINTS INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE FLANGED. ALL PIPING INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURES AND THROUGH THE WALLS SHAH BE CLASS 51 DUCTILE IRON. 5. ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE SAND OR GRAVEL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN SS%OF MAXMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHTOT-88 STANDARD PROCTOR. MORTAR WITH NONSFIRIFM ( r THICK STYROFOAM SM INSULATION PANELS SUITABLE FOR BURIAL FNRMLYATTACHEDTOTHE STRUCTURE WITH ADHESIVE 4'EMERGENCYCONNECTION CAP (ANDREWS MALE ADAPTOR IA40D WITH LOCKING CAP 40&DOL1) PROVIDE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS AT ALL7 BENDS 4'SDR 28 PVCJ SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING 4•FLANGED PVC QUARTERJ L- P FIANGEDCAST IRON TURN BALL VALVE SWINK; CHECK VALVE. FLOMATIC MODEL 78 OR EQUAL VAL VE PIT SIDE VIEW NTS CONDUIT TO CONTROL PANEL SENSORCLEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES 4• D.I. (BOTH SIDES) CAST OPENINGS STRAIGHT IN (MOT RADIALLY) nvv n1 4-EMERGENCY jTH _II CONNECTION CAP �J i 4' CHECK VALVE(MJJ \\ \ r BALL VALVE (TYP.) 4• CL 51 DI BILCO, PUMP MANUFACTURER OR AN — APPROVED EQUAL ALUMINUM DUPLEX ACCESS LID AND FRAME ASSEMBLY CAST -IN -PLACE PROVIDE PADLOCKS WITH SAME KEYSET FOR ACCESS LID, CONTROL PANEL, AND POWER DISCONNECT SW ITCH. B•(TYP)— ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH BUTYL ROPE OR A RUBBER O-RING USE FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE FOR PIPE PENETRATIONS OF Y OR LARGER \ / SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING UNDISTURBED EARTH 3Tx44'OPENN DRAB RECOMMENDED BY PUMP MANUFACTURER COPOLYMER MANHOLE STEPS 0 &1T O. C. (TYPJ NE DIA. REINFORCED CONCRETE PUMP STATION PROVIDE CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE GASKET FOR ALL PIPES TOR LARGER SUPPORTS v VALVE P/T /j 48• I.D. REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE V SON 26 PVC FORCE MAN PUMP STATION PLAN VIEW NTS 4'CL 51 DI FORM SUMP USING 2,500 PSI CONCRETE T R STAINLESS STEEL LIFTING CHAIN AS RECOMMENDED BY PUMP MANUFACTURER. ATTACH TO RISER. SENSORCLEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLY 8•SEWER INLET INV. ELEV • 318.2U TO SMHA6 PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL VERTICAL PIPE SUPPORTS WITH WE STAINLESS THREADEOROD ANCHORED INTO WETWELL EVERY T ON CENTER (MIN. OF 2) MULTITRODE PROBE SENSOR 3'EMERGENOY STORAGE CONNECTION INV. ELEV = 315.0' ALARM S "' PUMP ELEV • 3"" iM PUMP ON ELEV 3T4.B5' 'UM FF ELEV=3T3.T5' (SEE NOTE BELOW) 1T MIN. DEPTH OF 14' CRUSHED STONE UNDISTURBED EARTH PUMPS SHALL BE SUBMERGED. PUMP OFF LEVEL SHALL BE SET TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF Y OVER THE TOP OF THE PUMPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER F FLINT ELEVATIONS ARE ALTERED FROM THOSE SHOWN, PUMP STATION SIDE VIEW NTS ALARM LIGHT (2) PRESSURE -TREATED (.aa CCA) 8•x8•WOOD PoST9 ILL RATED NEMA AK DUPLEX POWER METER CONTROL PANEL. SIZE TO HOUSE ALLPUMP CONTROLS AND — fag' - DISCONNECT SWITCH MOUNT ALL PANELS ON PRESSURE TREATED(.40 CCA) 1I • x e• wooD PLANKS CONDUIT SEAL 3' ALL ABOVE GROUND CONDUIT IN. NEMA 4X SHALL BE C. 80 PVC, INSTALL JUNCTION BOX ENCASE POSTS IN EXPANSION JOINTS ON RISERS CONCRETE RUN 40 PVC NDUr �'�� RUN HI CO TO POWER SUPPLY — CONTROL PANEL SIDE VIEW 3r POKER METE DISCONNECT SWITCH TELEMETRY ENCLOSURE PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL CONTROL PANEL TOP VIEW NEENAH RHM2 FRAME S COVER OR EQUAL 4"TOP SOIL. SEED. AND MULCH SEAL JOINT WITH BUTYL ROPE OR A RUBBER O-RING AND MORTAR WITH WATERPROOF NON-SHRINKGROUT ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH BUTYL ROPE OR A RUBBER O-RING MONOLITHIC BASE MINIMUM OF Y HIGH N PROVIDE CAST - FLEXIBLE GASK ALL PIPES T OF r SDI TO PUMP I GALV., VINYL COATED VENT CA WITH BRONZE SCREEN (".) HIM ELEV = 368.04' GALV. STEEL VENT PI PAINTED GREEN (TYP.) 36• DIA. REINFORCED CONC. RISER AND FLATTOP SAND OR GRAVEL RACKFILL ONLY STORAGE ELEV • 37B.2 —ELEV • 375.2 �T SDR 3S PVC TO PUMP STATION INV. ELEV. 3752 12 MIN, DEPTH OF 3/4-CRUSHFD STONE I. as GAL. 1 SIDE VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK NTS 5000 PSI REINFORCED CONCRETE r------------------------------------------------- �e I I MIN I HPIAGE f FOR I ( I I I I MGER i I I I ( I I 1 1 SLOPE = 2% 1 II 35 PVC MDR. ACCESS OPENING 'ATON 1 PPE tY I I CONCRETE RISER AND OPENING CONCRE RISE AN OPENING I I FLATTOP 1 I I � I SLOPE • 2% I 1 I 1 I I IT PLAN VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK NTS TARE MI6 WITH LARST R V5= "AD if OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SWIM BROW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING pro} no. SPEAR MEADOWS ;4008 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON Design ABR drawn DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS ABR SEWER PUMP STATION we eD Date 06-06-16 Scale LAMOUREUgi & DIInc. N AS NOTED 14 Monc Dr Engineers, Inc' 14 M DHYC ht. no. Ju lKllVl; VTO5452 Tel: 802-878-0450 O;802- 13 , � ' Ate.-(��'•�i��'•��\I�i i'•IY,' t\4 � WO• �• 1 �� Yam, \ � �r���1�: ,.�L�\+•r `r� r • NI• • r STORM OUTFALL DETAIL NTS OF THE DITCH. PROVIDE 4" OF TOPSOIL AND ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS (CONSERVATION MIX) SLOPE I.• N -�-.�.�Ja1,�.♦per �I:l�♦.!' TYPICAL STONE DITCH / SPILLWAY DETAIL NTS TEMPORARYA�WICXNESS 3' MIN, SEDIMENT POOL ----- -I_----- 3 1' MN 3/8" r H-D 'Tour OR CI SFrTION A -A STORM STRUCTURE STORM SEWER STRUCUTURE - WRAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL) AROUND GRATE. INSPECT FABRIC AFTER EVERY STORM AND CLEAN OR REPLACE AS NECESSARY PLAN 1. NO RI ENNUN4 SHALL SE 14-1 ND W A CDN.TDIN YMd WILL PREWNT TRADDNG OF ..NEXT ONTO .0 B.RS-pF -MWY. TRIS MAY MDIA. OOC iD DINE-. W M ADdl1ONAL STONE AB CO.I - DEMAND MAND /OR CLLANOIT K My MEASURES USED M TRAP ..MENT, LL A..MENT TRADED, SPALE. OR WASHED 0NM PINK. -11OF-NARY SHALL 9E RENpNED MNEdAIFLY BY TIR CONIRACTOL 2. TIK U.. CAL.ON .6.80E ON HATER MAY BE NECESSARY M CODRO MST DURHG ME SUMMER. 3 PI IX IX APPIMP.ATE MANSTOK .TEEEN SIABUND CONSIRUCIM ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC MGHT-DF-WY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT TUTS Tp�CREATE GROOVES PERPENgC1AAR TO SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: SLOPE DIRECTION TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF TOPSOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND INSTALL VELOOTIES. MATTING, OR HYDROSEED WITH APPROVED BINDER AFTER SURFACE ROUGHENING. SLOPE GRADING NTS TURF ESTABLISHMENT SPECIFICATIONS ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT DO NOT HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS. 5 ROOFS) DR ARE NOT LANDSCAPED WITH BARK MULCH SHALL BE STABILIZED NEW GRASS COVER ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING FOR ESTABLISHING NEW GRASS COVER SHALL SEED. COMPLETE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 19 PLACEMENT a TOPSOIL AND THE WINCE NTH OF SEED FERTILIZER LINE WHERE APPLICABLE AND MULCH SHALL � IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING 1. A MINIMUM OF 4' OF APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE GROUND OR TOPSOIL IS FROZEN, EXCESSIVELY WET, OR OTHERWISE IN A CONDITION DETRIMENTAL TO THE WORK. FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, THE SURFACE SHALL BE RAKED. ALL STONES, LUMPS, ROOTS, OR OTHER OBJECTIONAL MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. 2. URBAN SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY IN ALL AREAS AT THE SPECIFIED RATE. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AFTER PERFORMING A SOIL TEST AND BE APPLIED BASED UPON SOIL DEFICIENCIES. LIME SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED AS NEEDED BASED UPON A SOIL PH TEST. 4. MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE SEEDING OPERATION BY NOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS, MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER THE AREA AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT THE APPLICATION OF A TACKFIER TO HOLD THE MULCH IN PLACE. IF NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE MULCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN APPROVED TACKIFIER WITHOUT ADDITION& COST TO THE OMER. 5. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. ALL DITCH CENTERLINE GRADES GREATER THAN 5X OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER ME SEED. EROSION MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH lOOX AGRICULTURAL STRAW MATRIX STITCH BOUNDED WITH DEGRADABLE THREAD BETWEEN TWO PHOTODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE NETTINGS, NORM AMERICAN SI50 OR EQUAL. 6. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FULL GROWTH OF GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. VEGETATION GROWTH SHALL BE PERMANENT AND SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION OF ME UNDERLYING SOIL UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF PRECIPITATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING AND CARING FOR SEEDED, MULCHED, AND AREAS OF ESTABLISHED VEGETATION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ME WORK BY THE OWNER. 1. EROSION MATTING WILL BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:IV OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 2. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. SOIL SURFACE SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH WITHOUT ROOTS, STONES OR OTHER PROTUSIONS THAT WILL PREVENT THE MATTING FROM BEING APPLIED IN FULL CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE. STONE FILTER - SEE SECTION VIEW FOR STONE 3, BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE MATTING IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH NTH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF MATTING EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE MATTING REQUIREMENTS WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12- APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND f4 o0y COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF MATTING BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL NTH A ROW OF Z.. STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12' PART ACROSS THE NOW OF THE MATTING. 4. ROLL THE MALTING DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY SLOPE. THAT THE APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST TING M T PL THE MATTING IS AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL MATTING MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY SECURELY FASTENED PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE MANUFACTURER'S STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND APPLICATION. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS. THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE PLAN VIEW LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE MATTING. BOIE3 1. INLET PROTECTION TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL CATCHBASINS OR YARD INLETS, 2. THE STONE FILTER SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLOWING EACH STORM. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS SHALL 13E REMOVED AND THE STONE REPLACED AS NECESSARY. 3. ME LIMITS QU ME STONE AROUND THE INLET MAY BE MODIFIED BY ME ENGINEER DEPENDING ON THE TOPOGRAPHY DIRECTING RUNOFF TO THE CATCHBASIN, CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION NTS 5. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL MATTING MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON MATTING TYPE. 6. CONSECUTIVE MATTING SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE - WITH THE UPPER MATTING PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE LOWER MATTING) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 12" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA APPROXIMATELY 12' APART ACROSS ENTIRE MATTING WIDTH. EROSION MATTING INSTALLATION DETAIL NTS URBAN MIX GRASS SEED ■ BY WEIGHT LBS. RLIVE SEED ACRE TYPE OF SEED 31.5 45 CREEPING RED FESCUE 37.25 37.5 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 31.25 37.5 TINTER HARDY, PERENNIAL R 100 120 / LIVE SEED PER ACRE URBAN SEED MIX SHALL BE USED ALONG THE NEW STREETS AND ALL LAWN AREAS STANDARD EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR THE EROSION PREVENTION AND INSPECTION A MONITORING SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. THESE ELEMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE SITE SPECIFIC EROSION 17, THE ONSITE COORDINATOR IS_ - -- PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS 18. THE ON -SITE COORDINATOR SHALL INSPECT, AND DOCUMENT IN WRITING, THE STATUS OF EROSION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT SITE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES AND 1, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, THE AREA OF SOIL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE LIMITED TO MEASURES IN PLACE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. PRKJR TO PREDICTED PRECIPITATION, AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM THOSE AREA THAT CAN BE ACTIVELY WORKED AND MANAGED WITH THE FORCES AVAILABLE. AREAS THAT ARE NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED FOR A PERIOD OF S DAYS OR MORESHALLBE EVENT WHICH GENERATES A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. TEMPORARILY STABILIZED. 19. DURING THE WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD (OCT. 15-APRIL 15) DAILY INPSECTIONS SHALL 2. THE MAXIM M AREA F S IL DI T RBA T A Y N TIME ON THE ENITR BE PERFORMED AND DOCUMENTED. PARCEL SHALL BE LESS THAN 5 ACRES, 20. INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE REDUCED TO NOT LESS THAN ONE PER MONTH IF THE 3. SEDIMENT BASINS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, PERIMETE0. DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND OTHER ENTIRE SITE IS TEMPORARILYSTABILIZEDAND ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTNITYHAS BEEN SUSPENDED. INPSECTIONS SHALL RESUME PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN MY LAND- DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE. DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE. 21. IN ADVANCE OF A PREDICTED RAINFALL OR SNOWMELT EVENT, ALL MANAGEMENT 4. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF SHALL NOT FLOW DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES UNLESS CONTAINED PRACTICES APPROPRIATE TO CURRENT AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST BE CHECKED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATING CONDITION. IF NECESSARY TO WITHIN AN ADEQUATE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL, FLUME, OR SLOPE DRAIN PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO WATERS OF THE STATE, THIS STRUCTURE. WILL INCLUDE THE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED SOILS ON THE SITE IN ADVANCE 5. WHENEVER WATER SEEPS FROM SLOPE FACE, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR OTHER PROTECTION OF THE ANTICIPATED RUNOFF PERIOD. SHALL BE PROVIDED. PERMIT NOTICE 6. BEFORE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS OR PIPES ARE MODE 2, ACOPYOFTHEDISCHARGE PERMIT, THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE, ABRIEF OPERATIONAL, ADEQUATE OUTLET PROTECTION AND MY REQUIRED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT, AND THE LOCATION WHERE E EROSION PREVENTION AND TH CHANNEL LINING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN BOTH THE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AND THE RECEMNG CHANNEL. SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ISAVAILABLE SHALL BE POSTEDATA LOCATION ON THE PROJECT SITE THAT IS VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC. 7. UNDERGROUND ADDITION TOTY LINES SHALL BE OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIALED N ACCORDANCE WITH ME FOLLOWING STANDARDS IN O CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING A. NO MORE THAN 500 LINEAR FEET OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME, SEE NOTES ON SHEET B FOR CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING. B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES. 8. ALL SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS A PART OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF N AN AREA THAT IS: SURFACE ROUGHENING GUIDELINES A. LESS MAN D FIE SLOPE. 1. SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, THEREBY REDUCING ME. B. USINGAT LEASTIR. GRAIN FROM OR DITCH) WATER BODY OR CONVEYANCE TOA WATER BQUY (INCLUDING STORM DRAIN INLET OR DITCH). POTENTIAL FOR EROSION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING FOR TRAPPING OF SEDIMENT. SURFACE C. VEGETATED. ROUGHENINGUSED: PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED FOLLOWING - ALLL SLOPES WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL BE SUSPENDED AND TEMPORARY DISPOSAL. STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. -PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH ON ALL FINAL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER. 9. FOR ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER BY VEGETATIVE COVER, SEEDING MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER MAN SEPTEMBER 15. 2. SURFACE ROUGHENING MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY TRACKING WITH EOUIPMENT, OR GROOVING WITH DISKS, TILLERS. SPRING HARROWS, OR THE TEETH OF A FRONT-END LOADER BUCKET. WHERE 10. ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION GROOVING IS USED, THEY SHOULD BE LESS THAN 31NCHES DEEP AND NO MORE MAN 15 INCHES BY OCTOBER 15 MUST BE STABILIZED BY ANCHORED MULCH AT ME WINTER APPLICATION RATE OF APART, 4 TONS PER ACRE, OR OMER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (E.G. ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT). DORMANT SEEDING E.G. WITH WINTER RYE) IS RECOMMENDED. 3. THE SURFACE ROUGHENING MUST ALWAYS BE DONE SUCH THAT ME HORIZONTAL GROOVES RUN ACROSS THE SLOPE AND ACT TO SLOW RUNOFF. 11. DISTURBED AREAS BORDERING AND DRAINING TO ROADS MUST HAVE AN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT BARRIER SPANNING THE EDGE OF ME DISTURBANCE TO PREVENT WASHING OF 4, WHEN USING EROSION MATTING, AVOID EXCESSIVE SURFACE ROUGHENING. MATTING MUST BE SEDIMENT ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO ROAD DITCHES. INSTALLED IN INTIMATE CONTACT WITH ME SOIL SURFACE TO BE EFFECTIVE. 12. HAY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. HAY MULCH APPLICATION DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT A RATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. WHERE SUBJECT TO BLOWING, MULCH SHALL SECURED IN PLACE BY TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT (WITH TRACK RUNNING PARALLEL TO SLOPE), A TACKIFIER, NETTING, OR REPLACED WITH PROPERLY ANCHORED EROSION MATTING. 13. PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS OF PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL AND COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING (NOT WITHSTANDING STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ELSEWHERE IN MIS PLAN). 14. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER ME TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED. STABILIZATION 16. ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST MA E TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATKIN WITHIN7DAY5. AFTER THIS TIME, ANY DISTURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT ME END OF EACH WORK DAY. THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY: A. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN ME AREA WITHIN ME NEXT 24 HOURS AND THERE IS NO PRECIPITATION FORECAST FOR THE NEXT 24 HOURS, B. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED IF THE WORK IS OCCURRING IN A SELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION (I.E. NO OUTLET) WITH A DEPTH OF 2 FEET OR GREATER (E.G. HOUSE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY TRENCHES). 16. MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONTINUED STABILIZATION. EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW, ALL SITES SHALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS, SUCH AS MULCH OR ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS. INCLUDING AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED Oft SECTIONS COMPLETED. A. ON ME CUT SIDE OF ROADS, DITCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH ROCK RIP -RAP OR OTHER NON -ERODIBLE LINERS (E.G. RECP), OR WHERE APPROPRIATE, VEGETATIVE MEASURES SUCH AS SOD. B. FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUCH AS BORROW OR STOCKPILE AREAS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS WITHIN 50 FT. OF A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION A DOWNSLOPE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING FOR EXAMPLE OF SILT FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTAIN SOIL. EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS ADJACENT M A CONVEYANCE THAT PROVIDES RAPID OFFSITE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT, SUCH AS ACUT SLOPE AT AN ENTRANCE, SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC OR GEOTEXTILE TO PREVENT SOIL LOSS UNTIL IT CAN BE STABILIZED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING MATERIAL OFF SITE. C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTILPERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS. SIMILARLY, STABILIZATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CONVERTING SEDIMENT TRMP ASINS INTO PERMANENT (POST -CONSTRUCTION) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. D. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. E. ALL SLOPES STEEPER MAN 3:1 (H:N), OR 33.3%, AS WELL AS PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS. AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL, UPON COMPLETIONS, BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH SOD. SEED AND ANCHORED STRAW MULCH. OR OMER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (RECP). AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED. SEE NOTE 1 FOR REINFORCING MERE SILT FENCE IS LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, STREAM, OR RECEIVING WATER STAKES TO BE / DPoVEN PIN. 12' INTO GROUND F- BOLES 1) (N SILT FENCE ICAUCE NSTALLED EWIRE NTH TMMAX. MESH SPACINGS) 100 EASTREAM. OR RECEIVING WATER SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WOVEN ARE FENCE 2) USE ONLY MANUAL METHODS OF INSTALLATION AND CLEANING WITHIN WETLAND AND BUFFER ZONE. 3) PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION OR EARTHMOVING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A CONTINUOUS SILT FENCE AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON ME SITE PLAN. 4 4FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO KEY IN ME BOTTOM OF ME SILT FENCE. IF NECESSARY, GRANULAR BORROW SHALL B USED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO KEY IN ME SILT FENCE RATHER THAN FROZEN NATIVE MATERIAL. 5) ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS NEEDED. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE NTS 5, NEVER BACK BLADE OR SCRAPE THE FINAL SOIL SURFACE. MIS WILL RESULT IN A SMOOTH SURFACE, INCREASING RUNOFF VELOCITY. SPECIAL WINTER EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INVOLVING EARTH DISTURBANCE CONTINUE PAST OCTOBER 15, OR BEGIN BEFORE APRIL 15, MEN THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED: i. STABILIZED ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE ENLARGED TO PROVIDE FOR SNOW STOCKPILING WHILE STILL MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL. PACKED SNOW AND ICE MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND ADDITIONAL STONE PLACED TO MAINTAIN ME LOOSE STONE SURFACE AT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS. 2. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED OR DRAWN IN TO REFLECT ME BOUNDARY OF WINTER WORK. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE DRAWN IN TO EXCLUDE ALL AREAS TEMPORARILY STABILIZED FOR ME WINTER AND AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCE DURING THE WINTER 15 NOT PLANNED. 3. BASED WON ME WINTER ACTIVITIES PROPOSED, ME CN-SITE PLAN COORDINATOR SHALL DEVELOP A SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT SHALL INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM A. ADEQUATE SIZE FOR SNOW STORAGE AREAS B. SNOW STORAGE AREAS LOCATED DOWN GRADIENT OF AREAS CF PLANNED DISTURBANCE C. CONTROL OF SNOWMELT RUNOFF D. PROHIBITING STORAGE OF SNOW IN STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURES. E. AMINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN PERIMETER CONTROLS (SUCH AS SILT FENCE) TO ALLOW FOR SNOW CLEARING AND MAINTENANCE. 4. N AREAS OF DISTURBANCE WITHIN 100 FT OF A RECEIVING WATER, SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED OR REPLACED WITH PERIMETER DIKES, SW ES, OR OTHER PRACTICES RESISTANT TO THE FORCES OF SNOW LOADS. 5. THE ONSITE PLAN COORDINATOR INSPECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO INSURE THAT MEV ARE OPEN AND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS, B. SILT FENCE AND OMER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AHEAD OF GROUND FREEZING. IF PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED OR MAINTAINED AFTER GROUND FREEZING, NO FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL BE USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERMS OR DIKES, OR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE. 7. WHERE MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, IT SHALL BE APPLIED TWICE THE STANDARD RATE. OR A MINIMUM OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. S. WHEN MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, AS NEEDED, IT SHALL BE ANCHORED TO PREVENT BLOWING AND REMOVAL BY WIND. ANCHORING MAY INCLUDE TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT, APPLICATION OF A TACKIFIER, OR NETTING. 9. TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT, AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BE STABILIZED AT ME END OF EACH DAY, WITH ME FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: A. IF NO PRECIPITATION WITHIN 24 HOURS IS FORECASTAND WORK WILL RESUME IN ME SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS, DAILY STABILIZATION IS NOT NECESSARY. W DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF, SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UFILRV TRENCHES. W. SNOW ANDIOR ICE SHALL BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF LESS THAN I-(ONEINCH) PRIOR TO TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 11. WHERE EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ON BUILDINGS WILL CONTINUE, OR WHERE VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED IS EXPECTED, A STABILIZED WORK AREA AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL. NFW IT ITI FT — ocnni n....... STRUCTURE 390 390 FINIS GRADE 388 388 388 9y7� J A�,N 388 384 OUTLET POOL EXISTING GROUND -- 384 PIPE — — — — — — — — —— -- FOREBAY 382 _ _=OUTLET — _ 382 _ _.._ _ _ _ 380 ___..._._______.__.. - — — — — — — 380 _ _ 378 -_-_ —____.--_-_ ____ _ 378 DATUM BLBV I 0 50 100 POND EAST SECTION i" = 10' HOR. 1" = F VERT. 150 200 388 EXISTING GROUND NEW OUTLET STRUCTURE 388 388 — — -- — — — -- — — — — — — — ------ — OUTLET PIPE TOPOFBERM3W 384 �y.7L FINISH GRADE SPILLWAY 384 382 — 382 380 ROCKBORROW -- ROCK BORROW 380 378 DATUN 6LEV 378 -'-•-- 0 50 100 150 POND WEST SECTION 1" =10. HOR. 1"= 5'VERT. 24'NFRAMl�NEAW WICAST RATE /IN ON FRAME AND ORATE ACCESS RISER TO BE PLACED OVER PIPE ENTRY (SEE PLAN) AST M 478 PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR AASHTO H-20 MANHOLE FRAME 8 COVER LOADING WITH PRECAST OPENINGS MARKED 1 / 17Ah/V�1Add/A, V1Mv 7�SLOPEr`RAtVAWAY 3W MINIMUM N jlPE I�TYPICAL WEIR OPENING GROUTFRAME BEEPLANFORSIZEB-��_ TO CONCRETE (TYPELEVATIONGROUT(INK �-38'ER REINFORCEDP.)(1)HORIZONTALII4REBAR WATERTIGHTRUBBERBOOTGROUT (TYP) RISER ANO COVER (TYP.)MID-OPENING30' MIORIFICE HOOD NOT SHOWN MIN. S' WIDTH BAFFLESEE DETAIL THI83HEET � 15^PE SEE PLAN FOR OUTLET PIPE TYPE 8 ELEVATION 0 WATER LEVEL 0 TLETORIFICEPRECAST OUTLET PIPES 1S'ASOVETOP OR DRILLED IN CONCRETE PROVIDE WATERTIGHT. OF UPPER -ICE (FACINGCENTEROFPOND—'� A 15'OPENING CAST -IN -PLACE BOOTS AT SEE PLANS FOR NUMBER ALL PIPE PENETRATIONS SIZE, AND ELEVATION OF ORIFICE(S) MINIMUM DEPTH • 5.2' SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET FOR ALL JOINTS SHALL BE ANTI -SEEP COLLAR REQUIREMENTS (STORAGEVOLUM _BWACF) INTERIOR TANK DIMENSIONS = ALL OI MSWITH BUTYL 4. 14'LONG Xr'WIDE XB'HIGH SEAROPE OR A RUBBER O-RING 38'sum P « 17 T MONOLffHIC BABE iT I (TYP.) MINIMUMOF2•HIGH B' EXTEND BEDDING TO SIB' CRUSHED STONE BEDDING LIMITS OF EXCAVATRIN UNDISTURBED GROUND. REMOVEALL MUCK, ORGANICS OR UNSUITABLE SOIL AND FILL WITH GRANULAR BORROW POND OUTLET STRUCTURE NTS -.P'CJ 112' MIN. DEPTH OF 3AY CRUSHED STONE STORMWATER PRETREATMENT TANK SPECIFICATIONS 1. USE A WATERTIGHT, REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE TANK CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING H-20 WHEEL LOADING AT THE DEPTH OF INSTALLATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 5,000 PSI AT 20 DAYS. 2. THE TANK. RISERS, AND ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT, 3. BACKFILL SIDES AND TOP OF TANK WITH SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHTO.T.99 STANDARD PROCTOR. STORM TANK #1 DETAIL NTS 200 250 x x' x• x VEGETATFC BUFFER ROOF TOP LENGTH ROOF TOPLENGTH VEGETATED BUFFER 1. SLOPE LAND AWAY FROM BUILDING AT 5%OR LESS. 2. LENGTH OF 5%(OR LESS) IS TO BE EQUAL TO, OR GREATER THAN. THE CONTRIBUTING ROOFTOP LENGTH (X) 3. SLOPED LAND IS TO BE VEGETATED. 4. WITH GUTTERS, THE ROOFTOP AREA CONTRIBUTING TO ANY ONE DOWNSPOUT LOCATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.000 S.F. 5. DOWNSPOUTS MUST BE 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE NEAREST IMPERVIO IS SURFACE, WITH RUNOFF DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION NTS EACH ANTI SEEP COLLAR SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE PIPE PLOWABLE FILL OR APPROVED CLAY UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL =11 OR DISTANCE TO TRENCH SIDEWALL OR BOTTdA, WHICHEVER IS GREATE0. -W f STORM PIPE 1. A MINIMUM OF THREE ANTI -SEEP COLLARS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE STORMWATER BASIN, GALV. METAL TOP PLATE 2. THE COLLAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PLOWABLE FILL (250 PSI CONCRETE)OR APPRWED CLAY. p.a 3. PAYMENT FOR THE ANTI -SEEP COLLARS SHALL CONSIDERED SUBSIDIARY TO THE STORMWATER PIPE INSTALLATIT ON. ANTI -SEEP COLLAR NTS 4/20/17 ADD STORM TANK DETAIL/REV POND WEST SECTION NEW OUTLET ORIFICE TO BE If 3/13/17 REVISED POND WEST& ADDED DISCONNECT DETAIL CORED IN STRUCTURE WALL REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEI IQ ROUND IT DIA. O SKETCH/CONCEPT CGMP HOOD 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL ` PROVIDE 3-1'DIA. HOLES 0 RECORD DRAWING EVENLY SPACEDAROUND pro HOOD AT 4' O.C. SPEAR MEADOWS s; WELD 1'X1'X3/18-MOLE TO CREATE FLAN GE PROVIDE 4 GALV. BOLTSONEACH FLANGE TO ATTACH TO STRUCTURE A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L8 OPEN BOTTOM BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE ORIFICE HOOD NTS %ra !� T 1 YA GRID WF S PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, EASEMENT TO BE CENTERED ON THE PAVED PATH AS CONSTRUCTED. SITE M. & M. SCOLLINS P. BRETT GRABOWSKI NIF & JENNIFER L. MILOT VOL. 115, PG. 523 NIF IPF LOCATION MAP VOL. 643, PG. 297 N07.p1=g^=-31T�06 f RF r N.T.S 1,107•1='4a� _ �� - 2.04 acres �-� F@ �O O �® ® PROPOSED 30 FEET WIDE WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE 1p sip 'fib 164.02 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ww-- N04.9603R PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE N07°11'41"Vy 148.80 R = 530.00' R = 4703- R = 4.37' ' L=78R= L=54.37' R = 470.00' L = 109.82' R = 530.00' WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE et �R= = 41.87' �oM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON o L = 83.58' 1 $ 504°50'03"E 164.02' 726.00' L = 11 I 31 L g UVM & STATE R = 666.00' AGRICULTURAL L = 99.87' 1 R = 270.00' COLLEGE 1 J L = 43.24' N/F PROPOSED R=330.W VOL. 134, PG. 364 STORMWATER POND w L = 66.46 a N 51 R = 531.00' 3.35 acres N L = 125.77' 49 ',°t6.67' 2,95 Baas a 5 �1 SIDELINE OF PROPOSED R = 170,00' 1 1. STORMWATER EASEMENT TO L=47.62' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON R = 471.00' 11.85"") $'i ( • 1� Ste_ 5-- 42 'I6 6.67' R = 230.00' S09�i5 E 8 $- 9 IPr. IP / ® ., 1L' C IPS KATHLEEN SAWTELLE N/F _ O ;,3 ®0.52 acres VOL. 1139 PG. 83 �' O ^ ^ TA. VOL. Z 14 4� 20' �� •3q• �Q 1 J IPS jr? / 1 7 IPF Z �1a' p C45.94' 061/ \ Nt8^p47Tf MARK & SHEILA PROPOSED 15' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT TO HOMEOWNERS PHILLIPPE ASSOCIATION NIF VOL. 50, PG. 350 ROBERT&TAMMY AVONDA NIF VOL. 1045. PG. 221 N09 IPS 48 9� 1.83 acres 4f N3 9 & p 2 / �7 I` LAVIGNE I CIMMONETTI N/F I NIF GRAPHIC OCALE 7W 0 60 1N 200 400 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 R. PROPOSED 15 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK SIDELINE OF VARIABLE WIDTH PROPOSED EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF BURLINGTON. EASEMENT TO BE SOUTH BURLINGTON. SIDELINE OF PROPOSED CENTERED ON THE SIDEWALK AS EASEMENT TO BE 5 FEET WEST OF THE EDGE CONSTRUCTED. OF THE PAVED PATH AS CONSTRUCTED. ILA ISHAM ESTATE N/F I 21.55' VOL. 405, PG. 726 T. & L. KLEH N/F _N05°02'35"W VOL. 175, PG. 163 IPS--337.80' - 364.0 _ x 1.41 acres \ h n a 21 l R = ,20.00' � 30.36 3 _ \ 2 / I IPS 1 .06' m 1. -- 30 00' 41 E L = 0, . I 16 11©I 18 I 2 �� R - 33000' R = 120.00' 180,W 48.91' L = 52.85' L = 101.791 L - 112.62' 16°2Y16-W 23� S07°11'41 E p 30." 433 1 1 24'23 120 49'41 E 7tIF- PS R = 120.00' R = 180.00' 171 43.33' ® J © j - N10'49'41"W 3 � R-1B0.00' R = 180.001 Q L = 3.20' n co acres IRF TSF IPS NO3°23'46'W 299'44' W. & M GILBERT o NIF VOL. 2D9, PG. 225 APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF , 2017 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 2017 BY NUMBER PNT NORTHING EASTING 1 35W SF 2N1 70]W9.85 1460M 65 20W 70TIW.24 14609%.91 2 3,500 SF -I 707Bm.40 146098941 m01 7078W79 t46098568 3 3,5W SF 2- 7017%.69 14610W.39 2006 70T717.28 14610M.M 4 3,6W SF 2007 707596.90 1460886.97 2W8 707648.30 146100323 5 3.5003E 2WB 707825.88 14W999.62 m10 70]578.OT 14810W88 6 35W SF mtl 70]5558T 1461W5.% m12 70TSW28 1461011.79 7 35W SF 2013 7074%,W 101013.35 m14 70743610 1461019.62 8 3,500 SF m15 70741821 1461032.69 m16 1073%.61 1481039.15 9 3.5003E m17 707321.W 146104)37 m18 172]1.W 14810W.63 10 3,6W SF 2019 707252,M 14610%.14 20M 70720245 14810e2.40 ii 3.500 SF 2021 70718260 1461W.W 20n 70]133W 1461071,16 12 SW SF 2 707113.16 W107367 04 70M.% 146107993 13 2,6WW m5 70m34.M IIISIO .57 7070.4 14eim.47 14 2823 2026 n7004.8 14810W.47 2027 70697.18 14610443 15 2,83 =7 7W977.18 146IN4.% mB 7-7 14607.23 16 2,652 W 708890.64 1460984.28 NW 70%56.65 14604M 97 iT 2,652 SF 0 22 ]OBE%65 14609M 97 mM ]W624.% 148098562 15 2,652 SF 2031 70%24.% 1460M 62 nu 7MM,% 148 ,. 19 2.8523E mm 7W704.W 146104EAB mu 10 RI". 1461077.74 20 2,662 SF mu 70%78995 46t07774 2035 7O%78.0 1461107.25 21 2,852% 20. 7-5.n 1461107.25 203s 706865.79 14811%.% 22 2.7NW M37 70700723 14609630J MW 707-Al 14W9%26 23 3.113 SP 2039 707055,60 14W9t4.79 2040 707.83.. 146Wtt2B 24 3.090 SF 2041 707109.% faeWW.n 20/2 70T1%,21 1/90953.71 25 3.080SF m/3 mT188.70 1480B1921 mN ]OT232.35 14WW3.72 OWNER: NUMBER PNT NORTHING EASTING 28 3,1135E m45 707248,0 1460915.39 201s 70727687 146091188 T 2.770W 2017 707N191 146N5336 2018 M7335.52 14fi0946.% 28 3,113 SF 2051 707362.73 1480880]8 2052 70T436.34 146087726 29 2,770 SF 2019 707431.11 1460929.03 20M 7m4%.% 146092227 m 3.Om SF .3 m748363 1480913 89 ms4 1-7.28 1460908.38 31 3,Om SF m% 7075W,35 1460904.21 m% 707%4.02 1460090.70 32 2.770 SF 2057 n7628.17 1460901.49 2068 707681A0 14B0892.18 33 3113 SF m59 707574.21 146%51.W 2080 70770135 1460846.19 34 3.6W SF -1 7075139 W 1450588.37 N62 70753043 14W598.34 M 3,WOSF 20B2 101530.43 1460W8.N 2W3 707481.13 14606W.65 m 3,6WSF 20e/ 707481.41 14608W.% 20% -2.10 1480619N 37 3AW SF N65 707412.10 146W1829 20% 707362.80 1460628.61 38 3,5N SF 2087 7OT1- 14W52 . M68 70747722 1460516.04 39 3,5N SF NBB 101498.94 1460512 ]2 m70 NT518.25 1480504.41 41 SAW SF m70 707518.25 14e0%4 Al W71 707%5.% 14.4.N 41 3. _5` mn N7e15,n 1-49277 m73 707684.% 14W484 45 42 3,113 SF M74 707795.45 14W566.% M75 N7W2.89 14W541.93 43 2.n0 SF m76 N7762.W 14WSW.81 m77 707776% 1460478.7 M 3,1138E 2080 707832.89 1460411.1! 2061 707NO.M 1460M5m 45 2.7705F 2078 707]]8.22 1460453,13 2079 7077M.60 146040103 46 3.1138E 2052 707US031 14603%26 2083 707B5 M 14603m.33 47 2,170 SF 2084 707615.45 14W31821 Me 707Bm.T6 1460266 32 cmm M86 70MOYS 1480188.2] IP N87 70797086 1480451 88 c64oN me9 7a%3e.73 us+o21.12 SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1340 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 VOL. 747, FIGS. 653-656 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA 1403. DATED THIS _ DAY OF , 2017 LEGEND - - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE - - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE - SIDELINE OF EASEMENT •�-' "'-' BARBED WIRE FENCE o......... . STONE WALL IPF IRON PIPE FOUND IRF IRON ROD FOUND fill TSF T-STAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET IPS IRON PIPE SET N/F NOW OR FORMERLY AG ABOVE GRADE BG BELOW GRADE 5Q COMMON AREA LOT NUMBER ® FOOTPRINT LOT NUMBER NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 1 (PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT) FOR SURVEY NOTES, THE PROJECT BOUNDARY, AND LOT 52. 2. THE AREAS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAT FOR THE COMMON AREA LOTS EXCLUDE THE AREAS WITHIN THE RESPECTIVE FOOTPRINT LOTS. 34.0' 050'0' C o L5.Al J nl I0 LJ 34.0' NPICAL FOOTPRINT TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 1.12 & 35-41 LOTS 13.21 3,500 a f 2,652 a f 54.01 44.0' NL 54.0' `4. J r. TYPICAL FOOTPRINT TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 22, 27, 29. 32, 43, LOTS 24, 25, 30 AND 31 45 AND 47 3,080 s f 2,770 a f 60.0' 28.0' b 0. 1. 54 $� Ir L �$ 82.V 80.0' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT LOT 34 LOTS 23, 26, 28, 33, 42, 44 AND 46 3,600 a f 3,113 a f CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. RECEIVED FOR RECORD , 2017 AT O'CLOCK _ M., AND RECORDED IN SLIDE # CITY CLERK (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) L.S. #656 LEGEND —S ® S— NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE — NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE & UNDERDRAIN d90 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR W ----H NEW WATER MAIN & HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE — — PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING TREES, TREE REMOVAL _.......................................390._ _ — — _ _ _ - EXISTING CONTOUR — DITCH CENTERLINE W EXISTING WATER LINE —5SS— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE ZO UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE - - - - - - EXISTING FENCE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT 0 EXISTING MAILBOX d EXISTINGV WHITE LINE CATCH BASIN RIM • 377.07 EXISTING — — BUILDING 1__I 160 LF OF NEW 15-HDPE(SL) INV N = 380.02 INV S•383.22 EXISTING 12-CMP INV N . 300.02 INV S = 30353 (TO BE REMOVED) REPAIRIREPAVE EXISTING ASPHALT — DRIVEWAY I ( I ''41,p �O ASPHALT EXRTING DOUBL"' /(g4ti4CE_Q�L' YELLOW LINES EXISITNGASPHALT DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND SIGN LEGEND SYMBOL MARKING LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN, ® 24" STOP BAR O � 1 VR-921 (30" X 36") ONLY 4" SOLID WHITE LINE LEFT El LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT, ® 4" DOTTED WHITE LINE < MUST R3-7 (30" X 30") TURN LEFT ® 4" DOUBLE YELLOW LINE ® 8" YELLOW LINE WORD MARKING YT cHJ ®. PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING SIGNS 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON NEW 2" SQUARE STEEL SIGN POSTS WITH ANCHORS. SEE VTRANS STANDARD T-45 FOR POST AND ANCHOR DETAILS. 2. ALL NEW SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, THE 2009 MUTCD, AND THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS 2012 SUPPLEMENT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A T HEIGHT CLEARANCE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN I I � III I I I III I L�—_�— g I S I I I I p, I EXISTINMOV BUID WATER BE e I REMOVE TO WATER I O SERVICE TO BE REMOVED I Q EXISTINGASPH I I DRIVEWAY TO BE I^ � © REMOVED 390 I 8 LL 3 I 390 380 Mw EXISTING RETNNING ) �! 39� WALL AND PLANTING < I age IBf AREA TO BED VEO \ �— L ,,n�1 3g8 //I �I SHOULDER B v / — 3g EXISTING�E, POLE OTT PAVEMENT BE RELOCATED — N! — — — N 396 392 /INV • 12' Pd _. UTILITY POLE TS \ BE.RELOCATEO 1 UTILNY POLE ,O BE RELOCATED, O GRAVEL yyy CONC� — \TELEPHONE ) AND 130' ELECTRIC PEDESTALS 90' PRIOR TO PAVING, COLD PLANE EXISTING PAVEMENT SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT --\ —\ (SPEAR STREET) EXISTING SUBBASE SHOULDER ems,J / Jg0 J RAISE SANITARY MANHOLE vvv -3EA 7" / TO MATCH NEYy.RPVEMENT _ Jam_ GRAV�L'1 TCHP VVALVE TO SPEAR STREET u O z F. CQNC APRON ASP gL.—ILqUE WALL SPLIT RAIL FEN B SPLIT— FE �-3fl9-. 'DRIVE _ �� _ —•i or _. ELECTRIC 1 225 PEDESTPL GRAPHIC SCALE 3D 0 15 30 ao 120 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION pn reeq 1 incN = 30 ft. NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING CONFLI TING PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE RE VED BY GRINDING USING A DIAMOND G E GRINDER (REFER TO VTRANS SPECIFICATI NS 646.12 REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT ARKINGS) PAVEMENT 2. TEMPORARY TRAFFI CONTROL DURING aazan REVISE PER PRFI IMINaav cnnnMPursrnunlnnua un� WIDENING CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MUTCD os-z�1s cREA' I'MIN. SEE PLANS 2" TYPE IV BITUMINOUS CONCRETE STANDARDS. PAVEMENT WEAR COURSE THESE PLV MINIMUM 4" TYPE It BITUMINOUS 3. COORDINATE WITH GIMP ON UTILITY POLE ONLY BE U51 CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE RELOCATION WITHIN LANE WIDENING LIMITS ON OR MATCH EXISTING. MAX. 2" LIFTS SPEAR STREET. SKETCH, 2'WIDE 0 PRELIMIP E AGGREGATE SHOULDER 4, RELOCATION OF MAILBOXES SHALL BE IN FINAL V4'/FT (vTRAN5 SPEC.704.12A) ACCORDANCE WITH VTRANS STANDARD J-3, 0 RECORD a 4" TOPSOIL, SEED MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAILS. AND MILCH EXISTING GROUND 6" COURSE GRADED CRUSHED EXISTING GRAVEL FOR SUBBASE SUBGRADE -' (VTRANS SPEC.704,05) 18" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED \\\ STONE (VTRANS SPEC. 704.06A) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ROAD WIDENING DETAIL NTS ° LEGEND F S . PROJECT PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE VT GRID — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED TO BE DISSOLVED SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBED WIRE FENCE SITE STONE WALL • LOCATION MAP IPF IRON PIPE FOUND ILA ISHAM ESTATE 21.SS • IRF IRON ROD FOUND N.T.S THOMAS&LOUISE ' N/F KLEH LIFE ESTATE 1.5' IPF VOL. 405, PG. 128 • TSF 1.3' AG 7C17Y pF SOUTH/F URLINGTON T-STAKE FOUND N4, �05°02'35"W ,� a CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET P. BR NN G R MILOTKI MICHAEL & MARY VOL. 1254, PG. 279 - V�L 934 PG, 104 & JENNIFER MILOT SCOLLINS IPS 337.60' N/F N� 1" IPF SO7°05'4�E 90.34' �" CITYOF SO • IPS IRON PIPE SET VOL. 115, PG. 523-- L 8 „8 Q. SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER) U. VOL. 643, PG. 297 317.06' 0.8' AG yp N/F URLINGTON 1" IRF N07"01= / (Vq(E-Al 10p 2" IPF 268.37 ' lVE'1 N/F NOW OR FORMERLY 2.5' AG N07�14'44� I __J AG ABOVE GRADE — / / JOHN LARKIN BG BELOW GRADE NIF VOL. 1010, PG. 77 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS: _ A. -LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF, SWIFT STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAT." DATED 4-2-01, VALE DRIVE LAST REVISED 5-23-03, BY LAMOUREUX& DICKINSON CONSULTING 9ENGINEERS, INC. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE392 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH $ _ — BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. B. "SWIFT ESTATES, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT." DATED B-30.71, BY WILLIS ENGINEERING, AS RECORDED IN VOL. 80, PAGE 184 OR I I THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. UVM 8 STATE AGRICULTURAL C. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOWS, COLLEGE -D m INC., R & T TARRANT, D & C FRANZONI, 1340 SPEAR STREET, SOUTH NIF IRON ROD FOUND BURLINGTON, VERMONT', DATED JANUARY 26, 2011, BY CIVIL VOL. 134. PG. 364 m 9.96' S78°35'37"E OF IRF PINNACLE AT SPEAR ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF D IRON PIPE TO BE 9' AC SET 0.T AG _ _ I SF I OPEN SPACE THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. n NO3°23'46"W 299.44' N/F D. "PLAT OF SURVEY, LANDS OF FARRELL & COLE, 1302, 1340 & 1350 I 1 SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT", DATED rn NOVEMBER 29, 2005, BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON LAND Q ^ RECORDS. 0 52 ( E. "FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT 8.80 ACRES WILLIAM 8 MAUREEN PROPOSED LOT a°I AND JOHN LARKIN. PINNACLE Q SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWLAND TWO) $ SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT.- DATED 8.21-98, GI m LAST REVISED 1599, BY VAUGHN C. BUTTON, L.S., AS RECORDED IN a I 0 I NIF SLIDE 335.2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. VOL. 209, PG. 225 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE GENERATED FROM a SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS RECORDED IN APRIL, 2016, '° AND ARE BASED ON THE VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATE � � ro I STREET A I SYSTEM, NAD83(CORS 1996). 4 1 _ 3. THE FIELDWORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL. 2016. 5. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS AND/OR V IPF RIGHTS -CIF -WAY. VIP SHED — — Ft 65.14 8. MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN 0.1'AG h / GARAGE S88°01'32"W ' 1.5" IPF KATHLEEN SAWTELLE 'a, 1.1' AG FYOUID & LINDA 7. THE WIDTH OF FOUR RODS (68') SHOWN FOR SPEAR STREET IS _ NG 100.23' BASED ON A DESCRIPTION FOUND ON PAGE 22 OF THE TOWN OF N� ^ N/F S 4*55'22 BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS, 1802-1865. VOL. 1139 PG. 83 I � � ��� VOL. 412, PG. 99 ` 8. SEE SHEET PL-2 FOR THE METES AND BOUNDS OF THE PROPOSED A S10°q4'1/ INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES, FOOTPRINT LOTS, AND PROPOSED 7 J IPS 0 i 196.61' EASEMENTS. 1 If /E 6D ( / .00 / 1 p KENNETH MILLER, II 50' OWL. L J J I T m °° S88°0192"1N VOL. 1274, 74, PG. 49 -3I4" IPF OWL. I74.08' i 0.5' AG � 1g�Q8' / I C � o 0 133 MARGARETA ` \ lyrf I T z DENCKER N/F MARK & SHEILA S/� /1N/6°JH,3g..F 3pj Sw. I I I / m N I VOL. 137, PG. 323 04-21 VO �ttTernit; JUALE Im 0 00 100 2. sac ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. Y\ APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OWNER: GARY N. FARRELL (VOL 677, PG 402) & 1350 SPEAR, LLC (VOL 1031, PG 73) & SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. (VOL 747, PG 653) 1350 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. TOTAL PARCEL AREA =25.93 ACRES REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF , 2017 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 2017 BY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF 27 VSA 1403. DATED THIS _ DAY OF , 2017 #656 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. RECEIVED FOR RECORD , 2017 AT O'CLOCK _ M., AND RECORDED IN SLIDE N CLERK (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) d LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 802-878-4450 Andy Rowe From: Andy Rowe Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:15 PM To: 'ray' Cc: 'Chris Snyder' Subject: Spear Meadow - duplex elevations Attachments: Spear Meadow Rd & Spear Street - corner duplex.pdf Hi Ray — Attached are the elevations of the duplex located at the corner of Spear Meadow Road and Spear Street. I will bring (6) 11x17 copies to the DRB hearing tonight. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 802.878.4450 13 M 03614206 Snyder Homes Spear Meadow Road Elevation x&E NOT,oSI&E«2.34) Spear Meadows - Duplex s1MWI R W April 27, 2017 BSg _,20NuseU—p � DESIGN w 031314206 Snyder Homes Spear Street Elevation xKE, WT TO ecKe b7.K1 r J C. A-01700 Spear Meadows - Duplex April 27, 2017 BSB 0 2014 MDWV.. DESIGN ' C. Shand et al ASTRONOMIC I 1- - - 0570-01225 J 10' WIDE PAVED PA/ TH � M. and M. Soollins TYPICAL 3 UNIT � , - _ _ x x- - � rld ' 1160-00214 �> > I /� T. g-t-Weh TOWNHOUSE'_ _ - - r a'O _a e - - . 1160-002fs GRAPHIC SCALE l� i - ao a �0 eo ,zo 20 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I -_ 5' WIDE SIDEWALK Pinnacle Open Space 0 WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - - - — —_ 1645-00089 _ ._ --- • l - - . _.._ .._ -- Vie E 12m 10 11 / RIVE —� n/Milot Partn arkl ership a ' 1742 00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - - PUBLIC STREET / �I. - - 3c SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS DUPLEX HOMES (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS 26 ---- i VALE DRIVE - �. �I..- �I # / ion 7 4 Q• Z - -IU / %� 0 0 33 30 31 y32 -' \:. O' I�APPED-CLASSIi QO• WETLANDS S ---'/ OPEN PP TYPICALDUPLEXFLAT r WETLANDS DELINEATED BY i �,' , • WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN _ _ Spear Meadows, Inc. �• 18 1 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK 11 — �` — s + ' ti RECEIVED ' • - (ACROSS WETLAND) TO \` OPEN SPACE 7, , JAN 0 0 2016 ® 35 _ --City of So. Burlington 1 TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE 1 50' PRIVATE STREET OPEN SPACE I OPEN SPACE 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR / FUTURE STREET EXTENSION / 26' 38 39 40 � ® 45 _a1 W. and M. Gilbert ' / ! { 1640-01400 •I < K. SAWTELLE 1846-01300 I LOT / / ,T, I ' C / 1"wm•'AIDE 9i1. 1350 SPEAR LLC - /ca�iceEh�cuRe 1640-01350 / I G. Far ell J 46- _,: • ® i ' ; L ' - / �1 r 40- 1302, L II r I C Q // , /' q I ® 1 1 III'. I i -i ARCEL 4 STORM WATER All \ oeTe+1�+ I BARN 5 I OPEN SPACE - I III D. Muhr o j a i ,l L. and D. Youngl --� I • .164Qi01406 M. Dencker ' / , , 1640-011402 I I � -16.40-014300 43 i__+� - t G. arniJ. Farrell / /�,�, I I "JR. and T. i I • / — —\ / �OlUMe 142, Pages - 1 I� -'; \ ` ±2.9 acres _ _ c 1 1 aRant I I ! r- 7 C. and B. • _ Marro u\ , , �� I I I 1 1040-01404 q. and C. Franzoni 4in I T /', I I 1 1 �1 1640-01406 1640-01295 I NPEW P AVENEMT ,�Eso i�g�E,ENuYyG° , SPEAR MEADOWS T��� Ra,�R. and T. Avonda V,x,S,RpsEcoa+ 1640-01317 ' SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 C. Shand et al I ASTRONOMIC I I - 0570-01225 10' WIDE PAVED PATH- 1 M. and M. Scollins TYPICAL 3 uNlr�, , - _- �-� I T. and L. Kleh a e _ 1 1160-00214 l� - "` �OWNHOUSrE _ r a O_ _ -- 1i6o-00299 'wz - _ _ - - GRAPHIC SCALE t� `/% Open Space 0 o 0 eo 0 240 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I l T.. WIDE SIDEWALK i---__ �Pinnacle Dt Spear +�WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES I--- - - - SINGLE FAMILY HOME` ' ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot O , % pj� m 1645-00089 -- /" _ _ rk /M I t P rt s © a I ership - I,zh _ 2 O 4�_.. �Q- �: /••• �� �_ L 1742-00033 'n io a n - 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL - C STREET PUB - FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - - PUBLIC I •l / 1 - - Ag VALE DRIVE �mti °' ooauoa — 7 !9 - to (> ry 9 b STORM WATER ARE W 1 33 31 30 - / -r Qo�O - O 0 PARCEL 4 cc g. ,` -i 32 I�i. ��� _ _ .•�''f 1 . — O • • .ASAP E1LAN055 Jt ' �O Q I eABN in CE — — AC OPEN TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I WETLANDS DELINEATED BY :p°�° _-,__._----------. 1 / ."'.:--... . '�• • . ` . '..1. WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN _ Spear Meadows, Inc. 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK \ -- — 18 �' — (ACROSS WETLAND) TO 11 RECEIVED • OPEN SPACE 36 37 - JAN 0 6 2016 q OPEN SPACE 3a - ,., City of So. Burlington I 1 � - STREET TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE �T / 1 OPEN SPACE - so ' PRIVATE OPEN SPACE - 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES , PINNACLE AT SPEAR III / / FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 26' 3g - � °� /�/ � '. 40 39 • / OC _ . _-41 I''. W. and M. Gilbert 4� - � I, - �--- 1640-01400 I / K. SAWTELLE 1 ! p� • .-- •I < 3 LOT 1 - • �i , p r I C NEw *0DE SIT 1350 SPEAR LLC `T -7 1 '.• I CONC, ROAD W/ / I l/ / / ell 46- 640-01350 J G. Far _. 411- 130?_r - �, D. Muhr �I � i 1 L. and D. Youn -- 1sa olaoa V r i o Ern ' , I , 9 e- M. Dencker , 1640-01 02 I \ 1640-01430 -- • 8D I G. and J. Farrell % • l — _ { p ` \ R. and T. \OlUrne 142, Pages 4rr-07 1 I \ ±2.9 acres I I _ C. and B. . arrant I / Marro uin A , 1 40-01404 ��• and C. Franzoni T� r 4 I - ^' - 1 /i 1640-01406 TI A SE CRtED��-TO4ATCR � SPEAR MEADOWS R. and T. Avonda ER ROAD STRUC/URAL SECTON 1y°� \ \ S ` ` 11 I I I i /I I 1640-01317 _ _. --`.\ P�q SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 I I - C. Shand et al _ ASTRONOMIC I I .-` - 1 / 0570-01225 q 10' WIDE PAVED PATH 1 M. and M. Scollins I TYPICAL 3 UNITS, , - _ _ PATH - 1160-00214 ; T. and L."Kleh �OWNHOu6E r a O a e_ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 %/ I / 1160-00219— �' Open Space 0 so o a eo 0 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' - 5' WIDE SIDEWALK - Pinnacle at Spear WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON FOOTPRINT LOT - r- • m P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - - VALE/ O 10 11 52 i .., ORIVE a 1Partnership-- I __ 2 O � . Q © � ,-:._. _ -- ,•• -.,- /� L rk Milot 1O ,`. n/1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL TREET I ••.•' FUTURE STREET EXTENSION i .. PUBLICS 'I. \ - - VALE DRIVE 26' _ _ Noc IL (j -,. ----- - PARCEL 4 - _'_ STORM WATER ARE /•' q to 32 'r�.� II� gAPPEo•C.LA$8 i •'.0.' (�(3 Q I I III DETB(�tON ':1 /' _ — ... _ — —`'T t; — �• •O, .WETLANDS .0 . CS OP '' ' ' ' TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT �- WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS _�_ - __.----'--" 1 "i I - t' • _ WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN -' 1 EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT 1 _ . /Spear Meadows, Inc. �- - `" ' 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK —� l -18 . _ . — (ACROSS WETLAND) TO I 1 — _ OPEN SPACE ` \ � RECEIVED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS U' \ DUPLEX HOMES 36 (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS 20 UNITS N O 201 �4 OPEN SPACE 35 ,,-- TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS L �T TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE 1 .,Ity Of So. BUrlingtOCs TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS ( % / P�/gTE STREET OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE 4.3 ACRES 1 — / 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL / 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 38 - as 45 - `�• � W. and M. Gilbert ;I 1640-01400 I :I K. SAWTELLE 1 �< / O o _ - - • / 1640-01300 1 .. I 3 — �� — •� / I _. LOT 1 I� $ NEW 2-e IMDE BIT. 5` 1350 SPEAR LLC ® / 1 CONCRETE OAD CURB 1640-01350 G. Fa ell 46 ` '� / i' i I —/ J- 1 - 40— 1302;'— k� �LJ �, �J I 7 � / L ® _ I 0 0 D. Muhr - LL L. and D. Young1 I-- 164p-0140a M. Dencker / 1 - / / ���� 1640-011402 I I • • \� /� 1840-01430 • p' � ` • . G. and J. Farrell / /, , I I "JR. and T. ume 14Z Pages 45-47 / ���� I I I I _ _ C. and B. • t2 acea `-�,'�,�' 1ao-01404 ' P. and C. Franzoni ?� /� / _ arrant 1 / _/ Marroquin 1 . I I I I , -_ I /r \ " ,/7�/�-- 1 1 1 I I I /I I 1640-01406 1640-01295 \ _'--- � SPEM S11,EfT I 1 NO m TW ' \ ' \ � �' '� _� I r\'I SPEAR MEADOWS sTRucTURAL sEcnoN 1Tea^ 1 1 1 I 11 R. and T. Avonda m RaAD SKETCH PLAN 1640-01317 R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 I I� C. Shand et al ASTRONOMIC I1 0570-01225 M. and M. Scollins I TYPICAL 3 UNITS _ , - _ - 10' WIDE PAVED PATH TH - x 1160-00214 �> > I� T. and L. Kleh -- - �OWNROU E - - , r a - a \ 1160-002ts-- GRAPHIC SCALE % - - - - o 3a q0 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' i„-_ 5' WIDE SIDEWALK Pinnacle Space 6 WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES - - �' fl SINGLE FAMILY HOME - 18. ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - - _ -----, 1645-00089 - 12 - _ — _ VA, LES _ - --� `• O 10 11 i � � _/ _ - m- DRivE -- Larkin/Milot Partnership - _ - �' ' •/ _ 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL - FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - I -- -_ PU13UL STREET 26' ----- 4m 3 cW=Wr VALE DRIVE - o, u0000a - --- --- 4t ® PARCEL4 - // - 410 AR c m STORM WATER_ 1 80 0 33 31 O :'.MnPaEo aassil":. �0 Q� DETE MON —41 _ WETLANDS 0. BASIN _- — OPV N SIP — _ TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I WETLANDS DELINEATED BY . 1 • J -!' a.' " . • " • " WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN 1 _ Spear Meadows, Inc. I ' `•' .: :'� 18 `—' 640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK— _ (ACROSS WETLAND) TO OPEN SPACE R I ' 38 37 )AN G 6 L�16 \ ` 'Q OPEN SPACE 1 3s `city of So. Burlington ! ( ET TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE 41 r PRNATE STREOPEN SPACE 50� � OPEN SPACE Ili - 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR FUTURE STREET EXTENSION / r . 26' Y 38 39 • � 0 r / ® 45 I - 41 W. and M. Gilbert K. SAWTELLE , - _ 1640-01400 •I Oe • - - / 3 - 1s ERR ® LOT 1 r iI T I II iL NEW 26' NDE SIT 1350 SPEAR LLC ••cCoNc ROAo / 1640-01350 G. Far ell I 1302; 1 1 f EJ I I I I 1I I/ •• D. _Muhr ij L. and D. You -olaoa M. Denckero Asao-_I- I- �/ I 1640-01401640-01430O' GA�dJ.Farrell R.and T.I%olumeT42, Pages 4547 ±2.9 acres Tarrant r / r _ C. and B. • _ �� /� �, 11 i 1I340-01404 �[�, and C. Franzoni j i I Marro Uln NEw sra�` isao-o1ao6 F\1 qi 1 1640-01295 ' I / PAVE4EM:RM.CW \ SPEAR S ECH PMEADOWS coNrTRucTEll ro A•a I I I I I I 1 1 � R. and T. Avonda E% ROAD SIRUCNRAI SECROH ,a�°^ \ \ SP ` \ \\ 11 i i I I i j i II II 1640-01317 \- �°�'�, \ E\ I I I I I I � I R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 ' I C. Shand et al I I AS NO I I -1 - 0570-01225 -- 1 10' WIDE PAVED PATH � M. and M. Scollins 1 -TOWNHOUSE-- IAL3ITS - o / - nso-oo21a �, � /� T. and L. Klehr a a e-- 1160-00219 GRAPHIC SCALE I �2u 210 I I,l_ 5' WIDE SIDEWALK _ :- - -- — POpen Space 3a 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' �� _-- — WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES I - — ' — _ — "'' innacle at Spear SINGLE FAMILY HOME 18' P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milbt ON FOOTPRINT LOT 12 _ DALE 1645-00089'' — __ — - 10 11 VE s 7 Mllot a I Partners L 'n/ �� •• / � —\ � 1742-00033 hi 60' ROW FOR POTENTIALET / l I' — ' FUTURE STREET EXTENSION PUBUC STRE �.% / QPO _ ` IIII — ' DR 26 3 - ,�o VALE ------ - I ?O� © t. �U PARCEL 4 v- 0 � m STORM WATER ARE 33 31 32 /—�. �e _ .©' AIAPPED'ClA$5li •' •�• �Q DEiwnoN --'+ . -- ,WETLANDS • _ i � Q I BARN R1 i .. r — .. - • 0 I N SPACE , , --- -- - .' • • �.:._--•-- -r-j- ' _ . � . • .. , —i T _ . OPE TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT WETLANDS DELINEATED BY .O• I SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS $ pear Meadows, Inc. _l WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I —% 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK _� L -- — I _ 18 �' (ACROSS WETLAND) TO 1 ` OPEN SPACE ` - \ R E C E I Y/ E SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS U' DUPLEX HOMES 1 36 37 JAN 0 6 2016 (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS -Q OPEN SPACE TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS I� — — — — /' I _ _ "--tity of So. Burlington TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS TE STREE / TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE pT OPEN SPACE 50, PRN I OPEN SPACE 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 26, / / ® 45 I W. and M. Gilbert • K. SAWTELLE I !� ± OQ • _ _ - - 1640-01400 i • 3 - LOT 1 /� 1640-01300 / % p N¢W 26vA� BIT 1350 SPEAR LLC , \ CONCRETE CURB 1640-01350 // J 1 G. Far, ell COHG�oAD W/ / 1 / / Ilf - / 46 rD. Muhr 11 I , t - / II _ I o - �� _ _ �i �� ° _ i L. and D. Youngl I I • 1640 i 0140a M. Dencker r o - --- \ - %.I me 1 2, Pages _- -J^ / �� L R.jand T. I / • /l l 30 \ 1640-01 02 16"40-014 t2.9 acres Y, / 1 arrant I r- -. I C. and B. • 1 I I I I I 1 \ , , /� ��' 1 I 111s40-01404 ��, and C. Franzoni Marroquin 1640-01295 1640-01406 SPEAR S1REE\• \ \ ` / � 1 I ' ' DENI `' I i SPEAR MEADOWS I ENV srEUCTEO ATCN -_ \- I I I I I I I I I streucTURk seenoN an R. and T. Avonda E% ROAD SKETCH PLAN 1640-01317 \ � Eiq �� �--- I I I I I I II R. and E. Lavigne 1 TREE% _ 1 DECEMBER 28, 2015 ' I C. Shand et al I ASTRONOMIC I 1 0570-01225 -' 10' WIDE PAVED PATH/ M. and M. Scollins TYPICAL 3 UNIT ' 1160-00214 �, I q T. and L. Kleh TomRouse- - r a'o_ _ a e GRAPHIC SCALE - \ 1160-00219 02 " - - -- �-' Open Space 0 m o w ao 240 111 PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' 1 l— T WIDE SIDEWALK _ — Pinnacle at Spear m WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON FOOTPRINT LOT _ ,'— P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot ' - - 1 sas-000s9 -� _ "_-- .. '... -" � . 12 �', � I � / - -�- _ DAALE® Larkin/Milot Partnership 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL — _ 0 FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - 1 o C STREET PU :I. 1 BU 26 - --- / f - VALE DRIVE -- - - � AM �. ® i i f Q .Z o - 5 PARCEL 4 �' ' • m0 �s — s STORM WATER AR c 1 30 o /v 0- _ 32 /./ I I �, ,.•..- PAPPED•'CLASS *11'.•.©-•'�(�.'` Cps g(i1pN A f _ . KILANDS Q 1 BASN U iT - — '�. �i 0 PACE _. y -�' -f j PENS .... O �� �— TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS DUPLEX HOMES (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN Spear Meadows, Inc. 18 : -- % 1640---1340 (ACRPATHO S WETLANDBOARDWALK I' �`.. _ .. •. L_ ..' _.:I REC I� `, - OPEN SPACE 111 JAN 0 6 2016 SPACE �Q OPEN SPa► O 35 _ I Clty Of So. BUrli gtnr. TREET TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE 42 50' ,.,VIS OPEN SPACE I OPEN SPACE — — 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR 1 FUTURE STREET EXTENSION � � 40 :.39 • / 45 W. Gilbert ,.41 and M Gilbe • / K. SAWTELLE.- 164o-01400 I •I / I `sa� 1300 I - LOT 1` . - _ _ • _ I 3 I J -CONNC.REROACYRB/ 1640-01350.i . kw 26 vDE a T.,II Tl I �- • G. Fa ll 6 , 40- 1302r I I I I I T I LJ --- �L— D. Muhr leiL. and D. YoungI--� 164Q-olaoa M. Den_cker ' I / I i i I I • _ I� r 1540-01430 0 • � � � � 1 � l I ,�i' 1640-01�402 I I ' _ -- OG. artti•J. Farrell I �. . I I "JR. and T. I I i \� "Volume 142, Pages ±2.9 acres arrant — r— I C. and B. • _ - r I I 1 i , 1. I r — Marroquin 1= I I, I, �sao-olaoa �, and C. Franzoni i I � _ 1 1640-01406 640-01295 1 NEW SPEAR sTREE\' I I i PAVEMENT 'MDENIN� ' S S OpNSTRUCTED TO MMATCH \/\ `. I PEAR MEADOW sTRucTURAE sEcnoN I I I R. and T. Avonda EI<RDAo sP —, _ I I I l I I 1 1 SKETCH PLAN 1640-01317 I I R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 I C. Shand et al = asraovov/c I 0570-01225 10' WIDE PAVED PATH / _ M. and M. Scollins I TYPICAL 3 UNIT 1160-00214 T. and L-..Kleh TOWNHOUSL- - r a •O_ GRAPHIC SCALE 1160-00219 _ _ - 00 0 30 120 zm ' 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I l - 5' WIDE SIDEWALK _ = - Pinnacle Open Space is WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES- „ SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot — — ' lsas-000ae ._� -- I - % / _ VALE IVE C2� --�- " � , _ —�g 7Larkrn/Mllot Partnershlp- O.- Q. \ O % 3 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - d PUBLIC STREET l ;1• ISO '-� I - - i oc VALE DRIVE rn ou0000 — � © !1 m - m S 0 ' PARCEL 4AW m o STORM WATER ARE 0 � � � . .. - Ni 32 / I I — '' Q' CIA �sS n' .' .� (i0. Q I BASH m i ' GE — — J- J — G1D O —_ I/. ENS PA A— 'l � :O • — _ Op TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS DUPLEX HOMES (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS '"__ 1 !�-• . ` . WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN "Spear Meadows, Inc. 16a0-73ao PATH AND BOARDWALK 16 / (ACROSS WETLAND)TO OPEN SPACE �� \ RECEIVED ED OPEN SPACE JAN Q 6 2016 I i E I_.� C •s q ® 3� -_- - 1"City of So. Burlington � TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE / l , 42 50' PRIVATE STREET OPEN SPACE I OPEN SPACE I i - 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES I PINNACLE AT SPEAR / FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 26' 38 ,41 • , 1 W. and M. Gilbert � • I 1640-01400 1 �1 / K. SAWTELLE - , • 3 — LOT 1 _ / O -4 zs' WOE BIT.1350 SPEAR LLC- - / I ��` co�NcnETE CURB 1640-01350 G. Far ell .�r� •- 40- 13021 • _ i / � % � � 1 � � II 1 I P - �\ x'- 1 L. and D. Young,I-- 164Q-01408 M. Dencker / t : �� / ���� 1640-011402 rtJ I I • 1G4--01430 -- p- a e�� G. and J. Farrell , , , I R./and T. — — � / `\"volume 142, Pages / ��/� I I I I * - 1 - -*2.9acres —., 1^><\ , , �, lan'ant I I j I �l C. and B. • _ / I I 1 7 r- I — // ,/ 1 I 11640-01404 q. and C. Franzoni j _ 1 Marroquin 1 / 1640-01406 1640-01295 svEM sTaEET�" _, NG � � I- I PAVEMENT �� p MATCN \ , \- I I I I I I \ I S S cm TED I I ROAo STc,uRw�r� PEAR MEADOW R. and T. Avonda I EC SP _ 1 I I i i 1640-01317 \- �°`• Eq �_ , I , I I I SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lavigne DECEMBER 28, 2015 i I I _ I C. Shand et al , I ASTRONOMIC I - - 0570-01225 _- �� 10' WIDE PAVED PATH _ M. and M. Scollins TYPICAL 3 UNIT ' 1160-00214 �� I q T. and L. Kleh r a o a e ` _ _ GRAPHIC SCALE — ' 1160-00219 w.• Open o a 120 2+" 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I /-_ 5' WIDE SIDEWALK Pinnacle Space atpSpear � i � WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES I '0p - _ _ SINGLE FAMILY HOME 149 18' ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - _ — 1645-00089 _ - - 12 ; ' ' ._. -.. /� _ VALE DIVE 8 Larkin/Milot Partnership 1742-00033 1 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL I C STREET / 1�O - FUTURE STREET EXTENSION � I ,_. - -- - � J. pUBI-1 Q • _ - ` _ 2 VALE DRIVE 26' PARCEL 4 c STORM WATER AR � 40 Mac f 'A32 �' I ; O.' .MAP�PcED CLASS 11 ` •W' ' QO DETBlfgN ,I I/ — . —.� { — �• ; • Q BAO, . Q I RN r11 i. _ — — -- � - • .. . n� EN SP ACE _ TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT z ' WETLANDS DELINEATED BY beC' — --"'— 1 •�• :i .. 't• WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS (---- 1 � EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I _ Spear1Me0ado00 Inc. PATH AND BOARDWALK --� -- — 18 ; (ACROSS WETLAND) TO I , _ •� OPEN SPACE 1\� SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS LZ 37 JAI 0 6 �.. DUPLEX HOMES (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS Q OPEN SPACE O / f S _ a ;City O O Burlington ur''Ington TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE 1 - TREET PRIVATES OPEN SPACE so' I OPEN SPACE I 4.3 ACRES PINNACLE AT SPEAR � 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 1 I 1 FUTURE STREET EXTENSION /%\ l 26 39 38 40 • I J v ® 45 I' 41 I. • W. and M. Gilbert • •I 1 Q — �1640-01400 I jl / K. SAWTELLE 1 pQ o - • 1646-01300 1 - • LOT I p k4 is- "DE em 1350 SPEAR LLC ,',• �1 - �� \ 1 RDAD CON- w/ / / • G. Fa ell ;' 4fi- I c� �Re ® 640-01350 40- 1302; l/ / l L �P 7 F • 1 fl I�_�I� D.Muhr c L. and D. Ymung 1 isao-o1ao6 M. Dencker I j \ ' 11.1>�. ���� 1640-01,402 I I 1 • • �� I-_ 16-40-01430 p �1 G. and J. Farrell / , , R1and T. / I — I _ - "'Volume 142, Pages 45-47 �l / �'/� I I L'_ � arrant �� -..., ±2.9 acres — — fi i I C. and B. 1� '• _ �. - / r 1 1 I u\ , / ��' , I I , f640-01404 P. and C. Franzoni Marro4in �T /' I 1640-014061640-01295 I i smDET�` _ � \ � S I yAyEy,ENt I I I 1- I I r' II SPEAR MEADOW DWStRUCTED ARCH ,389 \ \ R. and T. Avonda D1. eoAD siMUCTURA� seC^a+ n \ 1 I �I I SKETCH PLAN 1 1640-01317 �• Fj(+ \. I I' I I R. and E. Lavl�ne - R S I DECEMBER 28, 2015 I I C. Shand et al" ASTRONOMIC I 1 0570-01225 10' WIDE PAVED PATH M. and M. Scollins I TYPICAL 3 UNIT,, - 1160-00214 �,' � �� T. and L. Kleh - _- -' �OWNKOUSE - - J — a o a e _ 1160-00219- GRAPHIC SCALE I - - eo o 1. IN 240 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I � �- F WIDE SIDEWALK = - , Pinnacle Open Space 0 IS WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES n � SINGLE FAMILY HOME - - - - 18, _ ON FOOTPRINT LOT — - - P.B. Grabowski and.J. L. Milot _ 1645-00089' _-i = VALE12 _ _ - 11 7 -- j Larkin/Milot Partnership 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL O FUTURE STREET EXTENSION f --- _- o PUBLIC STREET 26' - . 3 pC• VALE DRIVE -- ---- - -- � T pARCEL 4 ---- c o STORM WATER ARE C I 30 0o O 31 AAPPED- Lrssil`LL.'+.©+• OCR Q ' D m.. �I I I,�� � ' .. — .. ''T f :._. . Q . WETLANDS • ` elt4/ SIP P1Cv— m., I Op �— TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I ` . 2 WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS — �' . WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I _ .• - Spear Meadows Inc. _ 18 _ ., 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK- I 4 IE i (ACROSS WETLAND) TO \`\REC SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS OPEN SPACE y DUPLEX HOMES I 38 37 JAN 0 6 2016 (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS \' OPEN SPACE O 35 TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS I. - --City of So. Burlington 1( i / ET TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS P�pTE STREET OPEN SPACE k ' OPEN SPACE so 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRES I PINNACLE AT SPEAR FUTURE STREET EXTENSION / 1 26' 39 ', ,' 38 • • /45 , 41 _ W. and M. Gilbert � �I K. SAWTELLE / - 1640-01400 • _ LOT 1 I ( / -- - I I I i _ NEW sb' Woe 9;T. • _ / 'I00 �1350 SPEAR LL � � �,' ` ' •: 1y� COI- RDAD W/ / I I • `� / 1 / — ((�•. CONCRETE CURB 1640-01350 I I I I • G. Far ell 46 • ® ,_j I 40- 1302! / '1 I L J ®� J 7'- � 'i • i� i � ,-. I I I I f I D. Muhr . L. and D. Young I--� / 164o-01408 M. Dencker � a� / I4 • / / 1640-01402 1640-01430 • Ab 1 G. ancJ J. Farrell rr� I • _ - O l% , / ,R. and T. o/ume 142, Page9 45-47 1 C. and B. • ±2.9acres - �� r Tarrant Marroquin I640-01404 q. and C. Franzord 1640-01295//� i-- I I 1640-01406 .. NEW smEET _ r / . • 1 I I I SREAR \`\ PAVEMENT EDI I CONSTRUCTED TO AIATCM _- I S MEADOWS EX ROM STRUCTURAL SE ,�gE�\ \ `. I I I II II AR R. and T. Avonda � �1 I I i I i i I 1640-01317 PFq I I, I I SKETCH PLAN � R. and E. Lavigne � � � � � R S` � � _ � � , I I I I I� -� ?'REET DECEMBER 28, 2015 C. Shand at al I ASTRONOMIC I 0570-01225 10' WIDE PAVED PATH M. and M. Scollins TYPICAL 3 UNIT, , - _ „so-ooz,a ; \ T. and L. Kleh �owNHouE _ r a o_ _ a Open e _ GRAPHIC SCALE 1160-00219 Space ffi o 3D 120 2.o 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' 5 i / - ' WIDE SIDEWALK 0 Pinnacle en at atSpear _ - _ WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES - SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON FOOTPRINT LOT - -- • /��- - P.B. Grabo 16 5 00089 % _L1 Milot _ _ "- DA E 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE STREET EXTENSION :•. arks Partnership L 'n/MilotPartn hi 1742-00033 4). _ - PUBLIC STREET I / I o VALE DRIVE 26'--- 2 - ' - oc u0000a ~O in 0 PARCEL 4 0 ©3 c I m STORM WATER AR ao 33 30 Q N-1 32 ''' II /. i- 'O .MAP*n-NDSS`11---w.-•�O m — — — '{ . — �: O' I _ -�. �-� N Sp ACE , _ . r r j _ : • _ OP TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT ' .' WETLANDS DELINEATED BY �Q .��•�� SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS DUPLEX HOMES (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS . �_�_.'i `' ,' • WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN I _ Spear Meadows, Inc. I 18 —� 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK _ (ACROSS WETLAND) TORECEN -- _ ' •�' � � OPEN SPACE pA, 2016 OPEN SPACE 35 I— I I ty of So. Burlington TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE I 1 42 EET OPEN SPACE 50' PATE STRE / I OPEN SPACE I - _ 50' ROW FOR POTENTIAL 4.3 ACRS I PINNACLE AT SPEAR l FUTURE STREET EXTENSION / - l I 261 \ 141 40 W. and M. Gilbert • K. SAWTELLE I / _ - �— - - 1640-01400 o • •� LOT1 I� 40 1350 SPEAR LLC NEW ss' W1DE BIT. �. // � � 1 � • // 1 CONC ROAD W/ / -__. (� coNCRErE LURe 164C-01350 � / I I I I • II 1, G. Fa ell ' �as- � i e�L 40- 1302; • -\. I i /1 L. and D. Young l I--\ 4640-01408 M. Den_cke_r _ L I / I I I O 1840-01,402 j I I � • � ^..-16"40-01430 - - • G. arni J. Farrell /����' I I ;'JR. and T. / -� I TIL lume 14Z Pages 45-47 l / r / I I t2.8 scree - I 'and I r- Marroquin 1 /,�/ I ; i I i is40-oleos P. and C. Franzoni 1640-01406 I 1 I 1640-01295 i 1 NEW SPEAR S',' ;AiCR 7ESPEAR MEADOWS PAVEMENT'MDEN� __ I CDNSTRUCD TD _ / R. and T. AVOnda Ex RDAD smuc�uau. 1640-0131' R. and E. Lavigne _ \ "` PFgR S� SKETCH PLAN DECEMBER 28, 2015 C. Shand-e E)I-'/ ASTRONOMIC I I `- \\�✓1,---105Jb 01226 10' WIDE PAVED PATH / I M. and M. SC011ins \� /� /�/n\\ 1 ,'�TYPICAL3 UNIT,'�'�i' �- 1160-00214 �i /\ fi. dr L,_Kleh /_ Jy o /' mow Hou - r a _ GRAPHIC SCALE- eo 0 00 00 13B 240 10' PAVED PATHITO MEANDER WITHIN 20' I l� 5' WIDE SIDEWALK / - --- Open Space 0 VVIDE`EASEMEN7`ITOAVOIQMATURE TREES ��` _= Sr Pinnacle at Spear (in,e1, SINGLE FAMILY HOME - ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowskiand J. L. Mllot1645-00089 o - - VALE® - - --- - _ e - M I ' '9 • Larkin/ io - t - _nr! t Partners ip 16 1(3 ' 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL � -"- PUBLIC STREET P - - - FUTURE STREET EXTEN _ _ �- \ _- - � - Q t=' LE DRIVE 26 - � i r 1 7 F - a000mr .- _ \ 4 0. PARCEL- = � b m o S70RM_WATER ARE T ...33 1 O C� 1 �Q ��... 32. S �,..:_ _--= - -, ! f K1'LAN�5S11`.'.�'.�O . --- N rn pp ' " -3".d4 ." __ '% I '•. \ :�•- ;' TY-fUPLEX FLAT PIQA` ; WETLANDS DELINEATED BY WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITSSpear Meadows, Inc. EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT 18 T i' 1640-1340 PATH AND BOARDWALK ` (ACROSS WETLAND) TO OPEN SPACE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITSj L DUPLEX HOMES I O -^ (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS OPEN SRACE I TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS / TOTAL NEW 47 UNITS / T F T REtT �1 PICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE (4J P I OPEN SPACE I OPEN SPACE 4.3 ACRES /a ROW FOR POTENTIAL / 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR I FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 39 / 44 45 a , 41 ;t ,'% W. and M. Gilbert /! r ( .-_ - •I / K. SAWTELLE , Q k "-_ I / _ \ l\ — — 1640-01400 <. , LOT 1 - IVEW 26' OE BR - T o vn 1350 SPEAR LLC ��' - T a • `_ -, ,' C0041 ROAD CURB 11 / r�Y Far ell r' �, 1 • �I / i coNgBE>E cueB 1640-0135D . \ 1 / / If o >_� I L. and D. Young I-- _ � - / - � � I '.Tsa>Z=ol�aos I M. Dencker i A a d i I 1 �. i / / ' ' /' lsao-01402 I I I • t I • �j G. ar+dvl FarrQlf i,',' 1 rr� I • -1 -16"40-01430 ` - - \ O' - L R. and T. � -/ 1'- olume 142, Pages 46-47 4 � - '- .W,.... ±2.9acres _—..,.. oC`, I -, larrant / / i- I-- I C. and B. - 3, ,/ ,'` I I I 1 1. 1 Marroquin 1 `"'� // ,' 1 i I i I640-01404 10. and C. Franzoni 1640-01295 \ /�/i//- i I I I 1640-01406-- ^ � [IF smEt� SPEAR MEADOWS Cuoi ' to MAm+ _ , �� Ra. 5>Ru. A� SECnaN �aee^ �l� I I I R. and T. Avonda i 1 1640-01317 SKETCH PLAN I R. and E. Lavigne _ _ _--„_ DECEMBER 28, 2015 I I I ACT 250 NOTICE APPLICATION #4C1173-2 AND HEARING 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001 - 6093 On March 2, 2018, Spear Meadows, Inc., Gary Farrell and 1350 Spear, LLC, filed application #4C1173-2 for a project described as the demolition of an existing dwelling at 1302 Spear Street and construction of 47 dwelling units with related site improvements. The project is located on 1350 Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont. This project will be evaluated by the District #4 Environmental Commission in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria of 10 V.S.A., § 6086(a). A public hearing is scheduled for April 12, 2018 at 9:30 AM at the Essex Junction District Office of the Agency of Natural Resources, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. A site visit will be held before the hearing at 8:30 AM starting at the northern end of Vale Drive. Parking is available along Vale Drive. The following persons or organizations may participate in the hearing for this project: 1. Statutory parties: The municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional planning commission, any adjacent municipality, municipal planning commission or regional planning commission if the project lands are located on, a town boundary and affected state agencies are entitled to party status. 2. Adjoining property owners and others: May participate as parties to the extent they have a particularized interest that may be affected by the proposed project under the ten criteria. 3. Non-party participants: The district commission, on its own motion or by petition, may allow others to participate in the hearing without being accorded party status. If you plan on participating in the hearing on behalf of a group or organization, please bring: 1) a written description of the organization, its purposes, and the nature of its membership (T.10, § 6085(c)(2)(B)); 2) documentation that prior to the date of the hearing, you were duly authorized to speak for the organization; and 3) that the organization has articulated a position with respect to the Project's impacts under specific Act 250 Criteria. If you wish further information regarding participation in this hearing, please contact the district coordinator (see below) before the date of the hearing. If you: have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify this office at least seven days prior to the above hearing date. If you feel that any of the District Commission members listed on the attached Certificate of Service under "For Your Information" may have a conflict of interest, or if there is any other reason a member should be disqualified from sitting on this case, please contact the district coordinator as soon as possible, no later than prior to the date of the first hearing or prehearing conference. A copy of the application and plans for this project is available for inspection by members of the public during regular working hours at the District #4 Environmental Office. The application can also be viewed at the Natural Resources Board web site (http://nrb.vermont.gov) by clicking on 'Act 250 Database" and entering the project number above. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 12th day of March 2018. By: Is/ Rachel Lomonaco Rachel Lomonaco District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 802-879-5658 rachel.lomonaco(a)vermont.aov Y:\NRB\Essex\DISTRICTS\DIST4\PROJECTS\4C1001-4C1250\4C1173\4C1173-2\Published Documents\District Commission Documents\4C1173-2 notice.docx �•b Lamoureux Engineers January 16, 2018 &t Dickinson Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow SD # 17-14 Dear Ray Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists We are writing in regards to the Development Review Board's Final Plat approval of the Spear Meadows planned unit development. The following correspond to the numbered items of the DRB Decision: 5. The applicant will provide correspondence from the University of Vermont regarding the easement between the project parcel and Swift Street 12. The following revisions have been made to the plans: - The survey plats include the signature and seal of the surveyor - The gravel path and boardwalk to the open space parcel have been increased to 10 feet wide. - The sidewalk on the west side of Vale Drive has been deleted. - The plans have been revised to incorporate the comments from the City Arborist. - Halcyon Lane (Street A) has been submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. 16. The enclosed CD includes PDFs of the approved plans 17. Legal documents are under review by the City attorney 30. A Notice of Conditions is under review by the City attorney. The Notice will be recorded by the applicant as soon as it has been approved. 31. Mylars of sheets 1, PL1, & PL2 are enclosed. The enclosed CD includes the property plats in digital format. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service We have enclosed, for your review the following: • Mylars of sheets 1, PL1, & PI-2 (Overall Site Plan and plats) • 3 full size and 1 reduced sets of plans • 911 street addresses • A CD containing the survey plats in digital format & PDFs of all plans • $45 check for recording sheets 1, PL1, & PL2 • $60 check for digital parcel fee Once the City attorney has completed review of the legal documents, we will have the Notice of Conditions executed and recorded. Please contact our office with any questions. Sincerely, Andrew Rowe P.E. c: Chris Snyder PA2014\14008\City\Final\draft plans to DPW stormwater.doc Spear Meadows December 2017 911 ADDRESS UNIT ADDRESS STREET 1 672 VALE DR 2 658 VALE DR 3 638 VALE DR 4 624 VALE DR 5 610 VALE DR 6 596 VALE DR 7 584 VALE DR 8 570 VALE DR 9 550 VALE DR 10 538 VALE DR 11 526 VALE DR 12 512 VALE DR 13 60 PRIVATE DRIVE B 14 62 PRIVATE DRIVE B 15 64 PRIVATE DRIVE B 16 61 PRIVATE DRIVE B 17 59 PRIVATE DRIVE B 18 51 PRIVATE DRIVE B 19 49 PRIVATE DRIVE B 20 41 PRIVATE DRIVE B 21 39 PRIVATE DRIVE B 22 509 VALE DR 23 511 VALE DR 24 527 VALE DR 25 529 VALE DR 26 543 VALE DR 27 545 VALE DR 28 581 VALE DR 29 583 VALE DR 30 599 VALE DR 31 601 VALE DR 32 136 SPEAR MEADOW RD 33 134 SPEAR MEADOW RD 34 37 Halcyon Drive 35 39 Halcyon Drive 36 59 Halcyon Drive 37 61 Halcyon Drive 38 50 Halcyon Drive 39 32 Halcyon Drive 40 30 Halcyon Drive 41 14 Halcyon Drive 42 73 SPEAR MEADOW RD 43 71 SPEAR MEADOW RD 44 41 SPEAR MEADOW RD 45 39 SPEAR MEADOW RD 46 31 SPEAR MEADOW RD 471 29 SPEAR MEADOW RD 481 18 SPEAR MEADOW RD Andy Rowe From: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 7:13 AM To: Andy Rowe Subject: RE: Spear Meadows - revised final plans Hi Andy, The revised plans look good to me. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(c)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as ivell as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Andy Rowe [mailto:andy@ldengineering.comj Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 8:41 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: Spear Meadows - revised final plans Hi Craig — The final plans for Spear Meadows have been revised in response to your comments — see the attached excerpt from the Final Plat approval. Attached is a PDF of the revised Landscaping Plan. Could you please review and confirm that your comments have been addressed? Thank you, Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 802.878.4450 STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 114-8-17 Vtec Snyder Group Inc, PUD Final Plat I Initial Notification August 31, 2017 The above -referenced appeal from a municipal panel, district commission, Agency of Natural Resources, or Agency of Agriculture was received at the Environmental Division on August 30, 2017. Environmental Division docket number 114-8-17 Vtec has been assigned to this appeal. Please use the Environmental Division docket number and the above case name when filing any documents or asking any questions concerning this case. Please note, this case name may not be final if we are missing necessary information from the appellant. All documents should be filed with the Environmental Division at: Superior Court Environmental Division 32 Cherry Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 303 Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 951-1740 Also, if you have not provided the Environmental Division with a telephone number where you can be reached during working hours for the purpose of telephone conferences, please do so as soon as possible. The Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings W.R.E.C.P.) set out the procedures to follow for this appeal. You may obtain a full copy of the Rules and Reporter's Notes at www.vermontjudiciary.org. The person filing the appeal is called "the appellant." The appellant must take certain actions in order to assure that this appeal is not dismissed. Consult the V.R.E.C.P. to see what those actions are. For requirements regarding the appellant's responsibility to notify interested parties, see V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4) for municipal appeals (see also Form 900 available on the Court's web site at www.vermontjudiciary.org by calling the Environmental Division at the above number and requesting that one be sent to you). This case will be ready for an initial pretrial conference when the time for filing the appellant's statement of questions has expired, or 20 days after the notice to interested parties has been sent, whichever occurs later. To complete service of appeals, the appellant must do as follows: • From an Appropriate Municipal Panel, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). The clerk of the appropriate municipal panel must provide the appellant with a list of interested persons within five working days of the municipality's receipt of a copy of the notice of appeal. • From a District Commission, District Coordinator or the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, follow V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(B): Take special notice that no list of interested parties will be provided by the tribunal, other than the service list on the decision appealed from. The Environmental Division may extend timeframes if a request is made by written motion filed with the Environmental Division before the deadline has expired. If this case is set for a hearing on the merits, the hearing will take place in or near the county in which the case originated. Please note that pursuant to V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(g), these appeals are de novo, unless the municipality has adopted procedures to make certain appeals on the record. Faxing or e-mailing a copy of a document is not sufficient to meet deadlines for filing documents with the Environmental Division. Faxed or e-mailed copies may be authorized by the Court in certain circumstances, but the Environmental Division will not accept a faxed or e- mailed document unless the sender has first telephoned the Court and obtained permission to do so and/or unless the judge has authorized faxing or e-mailing in a court order. A person filing any documents (including letters) with the Environmental Division must also send a copy of that document to each of the other parties. The Clerk of the Environmental Division will schedule a conference in person or by telephone as soon as all necessary documents have been filed with the Court or at the expiration of the deadlines for those documents. Before the initial conference, the Appellant is requested to provide the Environmental Division with a copy of the decision being appealed from. The Environmental Division finds it useful in preparing to discuss the appeal with the parties at the initial conference. Vermont Superior Court Environmental Division Environmental Division 32 Cherry Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 303 Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 951-1740 www.vermontjudiciary.org City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 fold line SK MURPHY ��� SULLIVAN KRO N K August 30, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Ms. Diane C. Chamberlin, Assistant Clerk Vermont Superior Court Environmental Division 32 Cherry Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 303 Burlington, VT 05401 Re: In re: Snyder Grp. Inc. Spear St. PUD, Dkt. No. Vtec Dear Diane: I represent Appellants William Gilbert, Maurene Gilbert, Louise Kleh, Michael Scollins, Mary Scollins, Robert Skiff, Marley Skiff and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association (collectively, "Appellants") in the above -referenced newly filed appeal. Contemporaneously with this letter, I am e-filing Appellants' Notice of Appeal dated today. Attached to the Notice of Appeal is the South Burlington Development Review Board's Findings of Fact and Decision dated August 1, 2017 concerning final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. Pursuant to the Court's April 5, 2017 Order dismissing without prejudice the prior case of In re: Snyder Grp. Inc. Spear St. PUD, Dkt. No. 14-2-17 Vtec (copy attached hereto), the Court has waived the filing fee for this new appeal. Thank you very much for your assistance. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely yours, ls/ Daniel A. Seff Daniel A. Seff dseff@mskvt.com Attachment (1) cc: Mr. David Parsons, Clerk, So. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd. (via First -Class Mail) (w/attachment) Andrew Bolduc, Esq. (via e-mail) (w/attachment) Matthew B. Byrne, Esq. (via e-mail) (w/attachment) 275 COLLEGE STREET, PO BOX 4485 BURLINGTON, VT 05406-4485 PHONE 802 861-7000 FAX 861-7007 MSKVT.COM VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT ENV RONM SUPERIOR CO DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT In re: The Snyder Group, Inc., Spear Street PUD ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 14-2-17 Vtec The above -captioned appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice and with all parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. All matters and questions raised in Appellants' Statement of Questions dated March 8, 2017 can be raised as part of an appeal from the City of South Burlington Development Review Board's eventual decision on The Snyder Group, Inc.'s upcoming application for final plat approval. The Court will waive the fling fee for such an appeal. S® ORDERED. Electronically signed on c• t s , 2017 at ����3 ��� , Vermont pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(4). 2t�%A Lo Thomas S. D in, Judge Environmental Division STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT In re: The Snyder Group, Inc., Spear Street PUD ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. Vtec NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COME Appellants William Gilbert, Maurene Gilbert, Louise Kleh, Michael Scollins, Mary Scollins, Robert Skiff, Marley Skiff, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association (collectively, "Appellants"), by and through their counsel, Murphy Sullivan Kronk, and hereby appeal, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) and 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), to the Vermont Superior Court, Environmental Division, from the August 1, 2017 Decision of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board ("DRB") granting The Snyder Group, Inc.'s application #SD-17-14 for final plat approval for a planned unit development on the 26.15-acre property located at 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont (the "Property"). A copy of the August 1, 2017 DRB Decision is attached hereto as an Exhibit. Appellants are interested persons within the meaning of 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3) who participated, within the meaning of 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), in the DRB proceedings concerning the Property. Pursuant to the above -cited statutes, Appellants have standing and party status to file and prosecute this appeal. All interested persons must enter an appearance in writing with the Vermont Superior Court, Environmental Division within 20 days of receiving this notice or in such other time as may be provided in subsection (c) of Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, if they wish to participate in the appeal. Page 1 of 2 DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 30th day of August, 2017. Respectfully submitted, MURPHY SULLIVAN KRONK By: ls/ Daniel A. SeLE Daniel A. Seff, Esq. ERN 1514 275 College Street, P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Phone: 802-861-7000 (x 119) Fax: 802-861-7007 Email: dseff@mskvt.com Attorneys for Appellants Page 2 of 2 t � i #SD-17-14 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING THE SNYDER GROUP, INC.-1302, 1340 & 1350 SPEAR STREET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-17-14 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 25.93 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on June 20, 2017. The applicant was represented by Chris Snyder and Andy Rowe. Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, The Snyder Group, Inc., seeks final plat approval for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Spear Meadows, Inc. 3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. 4. The application was received on April 27, 2017. 5. The plan set consists of 18 pages with the first page labeled "Spear Meadows A Residential Planned Unit Development Spear Street & Vale Drive South Burlington Overall Site Plan," dated June 6, 2016, and prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. A) DENSITY & TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS The South Burlington Land Development Regulations (LDR) for the SEQ-NR district allow a maximum base density of 1.2 units per acre and a maximum density of four (4) units per acre with a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). With a TDR, the combined parcels allow for a maximum density of 103 units (25.93 acres x 4=103.7 rounded down to the nearest whole unit), and without a TDR, thirty-one units (25.93 acres x 1.2 units/acre=31.12). The applicant proposes 48 units (one existing single family and 47 new units). This density is allowed with a TDR in 17 units (31 units from base density + 17 TDR units = 48 total). #SD-17-14 The applicant submitted a document entitled "Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement" to confirm that he has secured development rights in 25 units that will be transferred to this project, which is eight (8) more units than necessary. The Board finds that the density of the proposed project is within the allowable maximum of 103 units for the 2_.= acre parcel. The project involves three (3) existing parcels that will be merged then resubdivided into seven (7) lots. Footprint lots are proposed for 47 dwelling units (single family houses, duplexes, and triplexes) and the metes and bounds are noted in the plans. B) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (A)(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. The applicant is proposing to provide water via an easement over land owned by the University of Vermont to the north of the project. The Board finds this acceptable and requires documentation of the easement as a condition of this decision. The Board notes that a condition of the Board's preliminary approval required the applicant to remove from the plans the water line easement over the University of Vermont's property north of the property, as the University had not yet agreed to the easement. Since the University now agrees to this easement, the Board finds that the Preliminary Plat condition is no longer required. Director of Public Works Justin Rabidoux indicated via email on June 13, 2017 that the plans submitted have captured all past comments from the Department of Public Works, and that no new comments are necessary. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (A)(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (A)(3) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. As part of the preliminary plat application, the applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study. The application materials predict the project will generate 52 P.M. Peak Hour trip ends. A condition of preliminary approval required the addition of a left turn lane on Spear Street southbound. The project meets this condition with the addition of the required left turn lane on Sheet 16 of the plans. The applicant is hereby reminded that all pavement markings have to be Type 1 Permanent Markings and must be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to installation. 2 #SD-17-14 The Board finds that this criterion is met. (A)(4) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. Other than a roadway and crossing to the future City Park, development activities avoid the Class II wetlands. The wetland buffer boundary is proposed to be marked by boulders, a split rail fence, shrubs and/or trees, as indicated on Plan Sheet 8. The applicant proposes signage near the wetlands to educate residents about the on -site habitat and sensitive areas, and the role of the wetlands in the health of the community and property. The Board finds this proposal to provide sufficient separation and protection for those areas after residents move in to the development. At the Final Plat hearing, the applicant indicated that they also will install boulders along the western boundary of the wetland buffer in the proposed park area. The Board supports this adjustment. The Board finds the wetland and stream impacts indicated on the plans to be permissible and the delineation to be sufficient with the condition that boulders shall be installed along the western boundary of the wetland buffer in the planned city open space / park area. (A)(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning districts) in which it is located. The project is located in the City's Southeast Quadrant (SEQ) Land Use Planning Area and within the Lower Intensity -Principally Residential Future Land Use category of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The SEQ Land Use Planning Area indicates that "there has been a strong interest in building neighborhoods at higher densities in order to conserve more of the SEQ's priority open space lands" (p 3-32). The Lower Intensity -Principally Residential future land use category is described as follows: "Fostering a strong sense of neighborhood, these areas are primarily residential in use, with number of units and size of building to be among the lowest in the City. Open space are accessible and thoughtfully arranged as community gathering places, and roadways should largely be limited to local traffic with low volumes. While residential dwellings need not all be detached, the general character and appearance is that of a single family neighborhood. Building heights reflect this character. Small lots and small building are encouraged....' P. 3-6. This project fulfills these goals by including a TDR to focus development in this intended location while conserving open space elsewhere in the SEQ. In addition, the project provides a variety of housing types, including single-family, duplex, triplex development. The planned development pattern for properties to the north and the west (in part) of the proposed project are within the same future land use category and land use planning area as the subject area. #SD-17-14 The Board finds that the proposed development is visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Purpose of the SEQ District and in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (A)(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The project's layout includes open space in the southwestern portion of the property as well as around the wetland in the southern portion of the site. A buffer around a stream bed which traverses the project site is also provided. The open space abuts open space in the neighboring developments on Pinnacle Drive and Vale Drive. This results in approximately 20 acres of connected, undeveloped space. The Board finds this criterion met. (A)(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Comments were submitted by the Fire Chief during earlier stages of review. The Board finds this criterion met. (A)(8) Roads, recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. Both the ten (10)- foot paved path along the eastern border of the property and the sidewalk on the eastern side of the proposed Vale Drive extension will connect to the existing sidewalk system on Vale Drive. Street 'A' goes to the property line thus making extension to the south possible if the abutting lot is redeveloped. The proposed Vale Drive extension goes to the property line thus making extension to the north possible if that property is developed. The final plat plans include a sidewalk along a portion of the western side of Vale Drive. At the Final Plat hearing, the Board indicated that the small number of housing units in that location does not warrant a sidewalk beyond the minimum standards of the Regulations. Vale Drive will be extended to the northern property line and similarly Street 'A' will be built to the southern property line. The Board finds it possible that the properties abutting Street 'A' and the northern portion of Vale Drive could be developed in the future and that these two (2) streets could be part of an interconnected road network eventually conveyed to and maintained by the City. Therefore the streets must be built to City standards. The Board finds this criterion is met with the condition that the sidewalk on the western side of Vale Drive must be removed from the plans. (A)(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. For Transect Zone subdivisions, this standard shall only apply to the location and type of roads, recreation paths, and sidewalks. 4 #SD-17-14 The applicant proposes to construct the street network in two (2) phases. The estimated cost to construct phase I, including street trees, is $705,350 and for phase II is $910,800. These cost estimates have been accepted by the Director of Public Works. The project meets this criterion. (A)(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). In addition to the discussion above regarding the project's visual compatibility with the planned development patterns of the SEQ Zoning District, the Board finds the project to be consistent with the goals and objectives of this District since it will have a greater density of housing through the use of a TDR. In addition, this greater density, combined with the variety of housing styles (single-family, duplex, and triplex) may create more affordable housing options. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes, and proposes actions to address, the shortage of affordable housing in the community. The Board finds the project meets this criterion. C) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD requires site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. As discussed above, the Board concludes that the project meets this criterion. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The Board finds the proposed pedestrian amenities will promote safe pedestrian movement. The project also provides adequate parking for residents and their guests in garages and driveways. Additionally there are four (4) proposed parking spaces on Vale Drive by the gravel path leading to the open space area. The Board finds that the cedar hedges planned between houses and the sidewalk connecting the ten (10)-_foot paved path along the easterly border of the property with the sidewalk on the eastern side of Vale Drive will provide some privacy for residents and a transition from the public area (paths and sidewalks) to the private area (dwelling units). The landscaping plan describes the requirements established by the applicant for "foundation plantings," including a "minimum of 18 deciduous shrubs and 12 evergreen shrubs shall be planted for each dwelling unit. The cumulative number of plantings for a building containing multiple dwelling units #SD-17-14 may be apportioned around the perimeter of the building based upon the location of the windows, porches, decks, retaining walls, and other site conditions." Applicant proposes that foundation plantings shall be selected from a list of options included on the landscaping plan. Renderings of typical foundation plantings around a single-family home have been provided for the Board's review. The Board finds that this criterion is met. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) ... (ii) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; ON - NO... Each dwelling unit will have a garage. Parking is planned in driveways, garages, and along both a portion of Spear Meadow Road and the extension of Vale Drive. The triplexes will be accessed from a private driveway at the rear of the buildings and therefore the garages and parking will also be in the rear. Some of the duplexes are proposed to have a garage vehicle entrance that is perpendicular to the street and the Board finds this to be positive. The single-family houses lining the easterly side of Vale Drive could be good candidates for a rear garage entrance except that the proximity to the paved path along that property line makes the idea unappealing to the Board. Rear alleyways with garages also are not ideal for other houses on the property, because many of the houses are close to either wetland buffers or stormwater ponds. The Board finds this criterion is met. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. The proposed housing will have two (2) stories and no waivers are sought for height. The Board finds this criterion met. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. New utility services are planned to be installed underground. However, Green Mountain Power has not yet informed applicant of the location of transformer cabinets, so they are not shown on the plans. Revised plans must be submitted to show the location of utility cabinets, once their location is known. The Board finds this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (I) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), #SD-17-14 landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The transitions between structures are primarily dictated by the Home Design Guidelines prepared and proposed by the applicant. Among other items, the Guidelines indicate that buildings "should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony." The Guidelines state that front porches, stoops, and balconies which are oriented to the street are encouraged, but are not required. The Guidelines further state that identical home models cannot be placed next to or across the street from one another. To be considered sufficiently different, a model "must change any two of the five variables," which include "mirroring the plan, changing the color scheme, revising the placement or orientation of the garage, changing the palate of materials or modifying the roof lines." The Board concludes that these changes will result in attractive transitions between buildings and avoid monotony within the development. The Board finds these criteria are met and requires that single -and two family homes in the proposed development shall comply with the Home Design Guidelines as submitted. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed houses will have facades oriented towards the street and sidewalks, which is in keeping with the nearby neighborhoods on Vale Drive and Pinnacle Drive. The Board finds that the duplex units closest to Spear Street (units #46 & #47) will represent a change in style and form from the existing houses on Spear Street, which are single family and many of which are set back further from the road. The Home Design Guidelines prepared by the applicant require any units facing two (2) streets to include architectural and site elements that address both front facades. The applicant submitted elevations of this building as viewed from both Spear Street and Spear Meadow Road indicating that both facades will appear to be the "front" of the house. The Board finds this criterion is met. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: 1. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land maybe required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Board does not consider the reservation of land to be necessary except that the irrevocable offers of dedication for the northern end of Vale Drive and southern end of Street 'A' must extend to the property line. 7 #SD-17-14 2. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. All utilities are proposed to be underground. This criterion is met. 3. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The application proposes that residents will store household waste within the units and the attached garages. This proposal is acceptable and complies with this criterion. 5. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13 06) Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to planned unit development review. The total cost of the project is estimated at $9,950,000 by the applicant. The minimum landscaping budget, as shown below, is $107,000 and the applicant has proposed a budget of $108,050. Total Building Construction or Building Improvement Cost % of Total Construction/ Improvement Cost Cost of proposed project $0 - $250,000 3% $7,500 Next $250,000 2% $5,000 Additional over $500,000 1% $94,500 Minimum Landscaping $ $107,000 The applicant will construct the project in two (2) phases. Phase I will include $41,700 and phase II will include $66,350 worth of landscaping. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant has described snow storage locations on Sheet 2. The Board finds these criteria met. D. SOUTHEAST QUADRANT This proposed subdivision is located in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Therefore, it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ: A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ-NR sub- district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub -district shall #SD-17-14 not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. The applicant indicates that the proposed buildings will not exceed 28 feet in height. The Board finds this criterion is met. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds that this project meets this criterion. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds this project meets these criteria. (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. The applicant proposes to convey the parcel denoted as Lot #52 on the site plan, which is 6.8 acres, to the City for use as public open space that may be developed into a park to meet the active and passive recreational needs of South Burlington's residents. If the City accepts that parcel for use as public open space then the City will be responsible for its management. The land around each home, beyond the footprint lot lines, will be owned and maintained by the development's homeowner association, which will be responsible for maintenance of the lawns and landscaping. The applicant's materials state that each "homeowner will have the limited right to use the space immediately adjacent to their home for flower beds, raised garden beds, or patio space." The Board finds this criterion is met. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs, the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. Plans for the project show the wetland buffer line marked by boulders, split..rail fence, shrubs, and/or trees, which will provide sufficient separation and protection for those areas after residents move in to the #SD-17-14 development. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. According to the applicant, the easterly portion of the project area has been in agricultural use for the past several years. The applicant has not provided information regarding the agricultural production values of the land as currently used. By developing the property with housing the agricultural use will cease. However, the proposed TDR allows the project to be more densely developed so that land elsewhere in the SEQ remains undeveloped, which is a significant goal of the Comprehensive Plan. The Board finds this criterion is met. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirement, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. Before the Administrative Officer may issue a zoning permit the applicant must obtain all the permits listed above that are required for the project. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds these criteria met. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds this criterion met. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. Comments were submitted by the Fire Chief during earlier stages of review. The Board finds this criterion 10 #SD-17-14 met. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. As part of this project, Vale Drive, currently a cul-de-sac, will be extended northward to the property line and the northern terminus is designed so that Vale Drive could be further extended if the property to the north is ever developed. Additionally, the existing recreation path along Vale Drive will be extended along the newly constructed length of Vale Drive, and will be connected to Spear Street by a new recreation path along Spear Meadow Road. Finally, the southern end of Street 'A' ends at the property line, allowing for future connectivity. The Board finds that the application meets this criterion. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. As discussed previously, the Board considers it likely that future development of neighboring properties will require or propose that Vale Drive and Street'A' be continued and/or connected to other roads that the City maintains. The applicant proposes, in compliance with 15.12(D)(4), to construct the streets to the property line. The Board finds this criterion is met. 9.07 Regulating Plans A. B. C. ... D. Parks Design and Development. (1) General standards. The SEQ has an existing large community park, the Dorset Street Park Complex. Parks in the SEQ may be programmed as neighborhood parks or mini -parks as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Mini parks in the SEQ should be a minimum of 10,000 square feet, with programming approved by the South Burlington Recreation Department. Such parks are to be located through the neighborhoods in order to provide a car free destination for children and adults alike, and to enhance each neighborhood's quality of life. They shall be knitted into the neighborhood fabric as a focal point in the neighborhood, to add vitality and allow for greater surveillance by surrounding homes, local streets and visitors. Each park should be accessible by vehicle, foot, and bicycle and there should be a park within a quarter -mile of every home. 11 #SD-.17-14 (2) Specific Standards. The following park development guidelines are applicable in the SEQ- NRT, SEQ-NR, SEQ-VR, and SEQ-VC districts: a. Distribution and Amount of Parks: i. A range of parks and open space should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation. ii. Parks should serve as the focus for neighborhoods and be located at the heart of residential areas, served by public streets and fronted by development. iii. Parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program. iv. A neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one -quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned developed recreation area. b. Dedication of Parks and Open Space: Parks and protected open space must be approved by City Council for public ownership or management, or maintained permanently by a homeowners' association in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. c. Design Guidelines i. Parks should be fronted by homes and/or retail development in order to make them sociable, safe and attractive places. ii. Parks should be located along prominent pedestrian and bicycle connections. iii. To the extent feasible, single -loaded roads should be utilized adjacent to natural open spaces to define a clear transition between the private and public realm, and to reinforce dedicated open space as a natural resource and not extended yard areas. The applicant proposes to convey a 6.8- acre parcel to the City for use as open space and/or a park. It is located in the southern portion of the project site, would have homes nearby (existing and proposed), and would abut other open space. While the open space will not be located at the center of the proposed development, it will connect the proposed development and existing neighborhoods, which could access it via sidewalks or on bicycle. The amount of land, 6.8 acres, as compared to the number of possible residents in the proposed development (2.19 people/avg. household x 48 units=105.12 people) far exceeds the standard of 7.5 acres/1,000 residents or 0.0075 acres/person (0.0075 acres/person x 105.12 residents=0.79 acres). Given the size of the proposed open space parcel, it could serve many more people than those that will reside in the proposed development. The applicant proposes to construct an eight (8) - foot wide gravel path to a six (6) - foot wide boardwalk crossing the wetland to provide access to the westerly area of the open space/park parcel. in order for City staff in a pickup truck to access this area, the gravel access and the boardwalk must be widened to 10 feet. As a condition of approval, the wetland buffer on the park side of the wetland shall be delineated by the installation of boulders. As a condition of approval, an area of land off the end of the proposed gravel path with dimensions of 100' x 150' shall be created by regular mowing for use as a play area. 12 #SD-17-14 As a condition of approval, the plans must be revised to increase the width of the gravel access path from 8 to 10 feet and of the boardwalk from 6 feet to 10 feet. The Board finds that these criteria are met. 9.08 SEQ-NR &NRT Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 500 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. Vale Drive is uninterrupted for a span of greater than 500 feet; however, there are three (3) crosswalks at intervals of approximately 500 feet that connect to sidewalks. The Board finds this criterion met. (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). The northern portion of the extended Vale Drive and Street 'A' are presently depicted as dead ends; however, the streets will extend to the property line and may at some point in the future be continued and/or connected to another road network. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. See discussion above. (4) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. The three existing lots will be merged then subdivided into seven (7) new lots. However, the required minimum ratio of 1:2 is not applicable, because the project is a PUD. Each newly created lot will not be developed with a single house, but with housing clusters. The purpose of the minimum lot ratio is to ensure a certain form and pattern in development, but as a PUD, this project incorporates an innovative approach that clusters multiple housing units on the newly created lots. The Board finds this criterion to be met. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the 13 #SD-17-14 NR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-1 and 9-2, and Figures 9-4 and 9-5 of the SBLDR. The proposed streets within the project site will conform to the street design criteria for Local Streets as outlined in Table 9-2 of the LDR. Both Spear Meadow Road and the extension of Vale Drive will be 26 feet wide except at wetland crossings and some crosswalk areas. These dimensions could allow parking on one side of the street. Street 'A' and the private driveway for accessing the triplexes will be 24 feet wide, which is not considered a sufficient width for on -street parking, so the applicant will install "No Parking" signs on these streets. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (2) Sidewalks. (a) Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. (b) Sidewalks are required on one side of the street. Project plans show that the sidewalks are no less than five (5) feet wide, located on at least one side of the street, and include a sufficient planting strip. This project proposes sidewalks on both sides of Vale Drive, and, in accordance with the Official Map, a recreation path located parallel to Vale Drive. While previous development plans for this site proposed well over 80 housing units, the current plan proposes only 47 units overall and just 12 on the west side of Vale Drive. With crossing points over to the sidewalk and the recreation path proposed at both ends of these 12 units, and a more narrow section of road in the middle, the Board finds that the benefit of a sidewalk on the west side of Vale Drive is outweighed by the long term costs of maintaining this infrastructure that the LDR do not require. The plans shall be revised to remove the sidewalk on the west side of Vale Drive. The Board finds these criteria to be met. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) (a) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. (b) Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. The City Arborist submitted the following comments regarding the landscaping: • It would be very helpful to list quantities of each tree species in the plant list • Recommend a substitute for Tupelo, not well suited to site, requires acidic soil and is generally difficult to establish • Recommend substitute for Hockberry, have not had good results planting in clay soils in South Burlington • Sargent Cherry is better suited to use as an ornamental as opposed to a street tree, should be OK for use in island. Generally short lived species • Recommend increasing the number of 'Sienna; Freeman Maple and reducing the number 14 #SD-17-14 of 'Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple. 'Sienna' has superior structure and has not been planted as commonly. Should also consider 'Celebration' Freeman Maple as it also has superior structure to 'Autumn Blaze' • Accolade Elm is listed in the plan list as an American Elm cultivar [but] is actually an Asian Elm hybrid • Some suggested substitute species include but [are] not limited to 'Triumph' and 'Regal Elm'. Swamp White Oak, Burr Oak, Amur Maackia (smaller tree) The Board finds the applicant must adhere to the comments of the City Arborist and revise the landscaping plans to reflect those comments. (4) On -street parking. Sufficient space for one lane of on -street parking shall be provided on all streets except for arterials outside of the SEQ-VC and SEQ-VR sub -districts. This requirement may be waived within the SEQ-NRN sub -district provided the DRB finds sufficient off-street parking has been provided to accommodate the parking needs of the uses adjacent to the street. As discussed above, on -street parking will be provided on Spear Meadow Road and Vale Drive. It does not appear that Street 'A' is wide enough for on -street parking, but the DRB may modify this standard when reviewing a PUD. The Board approves the street width shown on the plans. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic. At two (2) of the proposed crosswalks the street narrows to reduce pedestrian crossing distance. Signage is proposed for both directions of traffic at all crosswalks to identify a pedestrian crossing and to call attention to.the possible presence of pedestrians. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. Applicant proposes six (6) street lights in the PUD, three (3) along Spear Meadows Road and three (3) along Vale Drive. The poles will be 13' tall and the lamps meet the standards of Appendix D of the LDR. The poles are a composite material with a high performance UV and weather resistant pigmented resin coating and an additional pigmented polyurethane coating. All street lights shall comply with Department of Public Works specifications. The Board finds this criterion to be met. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas ... A minimum of thirty- five percent (35%) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented to the south... 15 #SD-17-14 The applicant's materials, specifically the Home Design Guidelines, affirm that houses will be oriented to the street, that garages will be on the northerly side of buildings, and that a minimum of 35% of translucent windows and surfaces will face south. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (2) Building FaVades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines implements these criteria and the Design Constraints section contained therein specifies how this variation will be achieved. As discussed above in these comments, the Board finds that the Design Constraints will both create some variability of building facades and require some common building elements within the development. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings should beset back a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk. (b) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. The applicant proposes that residential buildings be set back ten (10) feet from the nearest street line and that garages be set back no less than 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk. The Board finds the proposed house setback will create a close relationship between the building and the street and that setting garages at least 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk will positively affect the pedestrian ambiance of the street. The project meets this criterion. (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages with a vehicle entrance that faces a front lot line, the fagade of the garage that includes the vehicle entrance must be set back a minimum of eight feet (8') behind the building line of the single or two-family dwelling. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines reflect this criterion and its subsections. The Board finds this criterion to be met. (5) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near -identical units. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines include this criterion, but do not offer specifics on housing styles. The plans show that Street 'A' will have a mix of duplexes and single-family houses, that Spear Meadow Road will be primarily duplexes with an entrance to the existing single-family home, and that Vale Drive will have a mix of single-family, duplex, and triplex units fronting on the street. While the triplexes are essentially clustered together on one side of Vale Drive (with a private driveway to the rear), the units are next to and across from single family and duplex units, so there is some degree of co- 16 #SD-17-14 mingling amongst housing types. The single-family homes on Vale Drive are primarily on the eastern side of the street, but there are a couple single-family units with a shared driveway on the western side. The Board finds this criterion is met. E. WAIVERS The applicant requests the following waivers: 1. Buildings shall have a setback of ten (10) feet from the nearest street line, and garages shall be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk. 2. Minimum rear setback of 20 feet for new interior lot lines. 3. Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow the clustering of homes. The Board concludes that the requested waivers align with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District as already discussed in these comments. F. TRAFFIC IMPACT Based upon proposed construction of 47 single family dwellings (ITE Land Use Category #210), the following estimates have been calculated. Level of Service will be excellent, with minimal delays and little or no queuing, at the new Spear Street/Spear Meadow intersection. The project will have a minimal (negative?) impact on existing and future levels of service at the Spear Street and Swift Street intersection and at the Spear Street and Allen Street intersection. The Board indicated in the preliminary plat decision that it would review traffic impacts at the final plat stage of review. The Board received the following comments from Justin Rabidoux of Public Works in an email dated September 29, 2016: I reviewed the traffic study for the referenced project submitted by L&D on behalf of the applicant. I support its findings with one exception — a southbound on Spear left turn lane needs to be added to this project to improve overall access, circulation and safety to the general area. The applicant has, under separate cover, sent over what that lane would look like and I approve of its design. 1 encourage the DRB to add this to the project and 1 suspect the applicant would accept that condition. DPW staff has gone over the overall plans with Andy Rowe from L&D numerous times and each time minor tweaks have been made to pedestrian issues and l think the plan is acceptable at this point. I want to use this opportunity to remind the applicant that ail pavement markings have to be Type 1 Permanent markings and preapproved by DPW prior to installation. Thanks, Justin Robidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer The final plat application includes a southbound left turn lane. The Board concurs with the comments of the Director of Public Works, and directs the applicant to comply with these comments. 17 #SD-17-14 G. STORMWATER The Stormwater Section provided the following comments to the Board in an email dated June 16, 2017: The Stormwater Section has reviewed the "Spear Meadows" site plan prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson, last revised on 4120117. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit and an operational stormwater permit from the State. 2. The project crosses wetlands in multiple locations and will need a conditional use determination (CUD) from VT DEC. 3. Some of the units back up to the wetland and associated buffer. Use of this buffer area is regulated under section 12.02 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR). The DRB should include a condition that this buffer area not be turned into lawn. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. The Board concurs with the comments of the Stormwater Section, and directs the applicant to comply with these comments. H. ENERGY STANDARDS The Board notes that all new buildings are subject to the Stretch Code pursuant to Section 3.15: Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs. I. OTHER ISSUES Street'A' and Spear Meadows Drive must receive a street name from the Planning Commission. This process is underway. All structures must have E911 numbers assigned. This process is underway. DECISION Motion by , seconded by , to approve final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect except as amended herein. This project must be completed as shown on the final plat plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. The applicant must obtain a zoning permit for the first building within six (6) months of this approval. The Development Review Board grants a period of five (5) years for applicant to obtain zoning permits for the multi -family buildings. If applicant has not obtained a zoning permit for any of these approved buildings within this five-year period, applicant will be eligible, per Section 17.04 IN #SD-17-14 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, for one (1) extension to an approval if the application is submitted to the Department of Planning and Zoning before the approval has expired and if the Development Review Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Development Review Board may grant up to one (1) additional year for applicant to obtain zoning permits for the multi -family buildings. 4. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the 32"d dwelling unit and subject to the approval of the City Attorney, the applicant must record in the South Burlington land records the document entitled, "Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights" and a survey of the area from which the 17 transferable development rights have been severed, as required under 24 V.S.A § 4423(b)(4). 5. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant must provide to the Planning and Zoning Department verification that the University of Vermont has granted an easement on its land to the north of the project for the location and maintenance of the water line that will provide water to the PUD. 6. The applicant must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use or occupancy of the multi -family dwellings. 7. Future proposals to add decks, sunrooms, and/or porches to any single family dwelling or to any dwelling unit in a two-family dwelling within the approved lot or footprint lot belonging to that unit will require only a zoning permit. 8. The Board approves the width for Street 'A' that is depicted on the plans. The applicant must receive final wastewater allocations for the project before the Administrative Officer may issue any zoning permits. 10. The Board approves the following waivers: a. Buildings shall have a setback of ten (10) feet from the nearest street line, and garages shall be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk. b. Minimum rear setback of 20 feet for new interior lot lines. c. Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow the clustering of homes. 11. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 12. The plat plans must be revised to include the changes listed below and then submitted to the Administrative Officer for approval. Prior to recording the plat, applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer three (3) copies of the plans approved by the Administrative Officer. a. The survey plats must be revised to include the signature and seal of the land surveyor. b. The plans that depict the 6.8-acre parcel of open space and/or park must be revised to increase the width of the gravel access path from 8 to 10 feet and of the boardwalk from 6 to 10 feet. 19 #SD-17-14 c. The plans must be revised to remove any sidewalk on the west side of Vale Drive. d. The plans must be revised to incorporate the changes recommended by the City Arborist. e. The plans must be revised to include the name of Street 'A' approved by the Planning Commission and street numbers by the E-911 addressing system. 13. The applicant must obtain final plat approval of plans revised to depict the location of the utility cabinets. 14. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the LDR. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the LDR. 15. The applicant shall comply with the comments of the Stormwater Section, as listed in Section G a bove. 16. Before the Administrative Officer may issue a zoning permit for either the first lot or to start utility or road construction, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer a final set of approved project plans in digital (PDF) format. 17. Prior to recording the final plat plans, all appropriate legal documents (e.g., the irrevocable offer of dedication (IOD) and the warranty deed for the proposed public roads, park land and utility, sewer, drainage, and water, etc.), including without limitation easement deeds, shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and the legal documents approved by the City Attorney shall be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. The IOD for the northerly section of Vale Drive and Street "A" must extend to the property line. 18. Before the Administrative Officer may issue a zoning permit for the first permit in each phase indicated below, the applicant shall post landscaping bonds for site landscaping in the amounts indicated. These bonds shall remain in full effect for three (3) years from completion to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of survival. a. phase I, a $41,700 landscape bond b. phase II, a $66,350 landscape bond 19. Prior to start of construction of the road infrastructure for phases I and II, the applicant shall post a bond in the amount of $705,350 and in the amount of $910,800 respectively. 20. Street trees must be in their approved places along the street before the final layer of the pavement may be added. 21. There shall be no use of herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers within either the wetlands or the associated buffers. Before the Administrative Officer may issue a zoning permit for the first building on the property, and subject to the City Attorney's approval, the applicant must record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect. 22. There shall be no mowing within 50 feet of the wetlands on the property. Brush -hogging is permitted no more than three (3) times per year. Before the Administrative Officer may issue a 20 #SD-17-14 zoning permit for the first building on the property, and subject to the City Attorney's approval, the applicant shall record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect. 23. The wetland buffer on the park side of the wetland shall be delineated by the installation of boulders. 24. An area of land off the end of the proposed gravel path in the park / open space with dimensions of 100' x 150' shall be created by regular mowing for use as a play area. 25. Before the Administrative Officer may issue the first zoning permit for the project, applicant must provide to the Administrative Officer a copy of any stormwater permit that the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Stormwater Division requires for the project. 26. The applicant must regularly maintain all on -site stormwater treatment and conveyance structures. 27. All pavement markings must be Type 1 Permanent Markings and must be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to installation. 28. All single and two (2) - family dwellings must comply with the Home Design Guidelines dated 3/30/17. 29. Fire hydrants shall be in place and tested prior to construction of combustible structures. 30. This PUD consists of seven (7) lots. For the purposes of the LDR, footprint lots are not recognized, considered or treated as separate lots. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant must record, subject to the City Attorney's approval, a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect. 31. The final plat plans (sheets 1, PL1, and PL2,) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit to the Administrative Officer a copy of the survey plats in a digital format approved by the South Burlington GIS Coordinator. 32. Any changes to the final plat plans must be approved by the Development Review Board. Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain Not Present David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain Not Present John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of S-0 — 0. Signed this 1' day of August 2017, by Bill Miller, Chair 21 #SD-17-14 PLEASE NOTE: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail with the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal also must be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-951-1740 or https://www,vermontjudiciary.org/environmental for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.477.2241 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 22 STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT In re: The Snyder Group, Inc., Spear Street PUD ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. Vtec CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that today, upon receipt from jud-noreply(a,vermont.gov of confirmation of the electronic submission to the Vermont Superior Court — Environmental Division of (1) the Notice of Appeal, (2) a letter addressed to Ms. Diane C. Chamberlin, Assistant Clerk, concerning a Court -approved waiver of the filing fee, and (3) this Certificate of Service, all dated today, I served copies of these three documents on the Clerk of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board via First -Class Mail by causing an envelope containing same to be deposited into the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: David Parsons, Clerk City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 In addition, I served PDF copies of the three above -described documents on: (1) Matthew B. Byrne, Esq. attorney for the Applicant, The Snyder Group, Inc., via electronic mail, addressed as follows: mbyrnengravelshea.com (with a copy to Gravel & Shea PC Legal Assistant Linda Bradford Barron, addressed as follows: lbarron ,gravelshea.com); and (2) Andrew Bolduc, Esq. attorney for the City of South Burlington, via electronic mail, addressed as follows: abolduegsburl.com. DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 30th day of August, 2017. Respectfully submitted, MURPHY SULLIVAN KRONK By: ls/ Daniel A. Se ff Daniel A. Seff, Esq. ERN 1514 275 College Street, P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Phone: 802-861-7000 (x 119) Fax: 802-861-7007 Email: dseff@mskvt.com Attorneys for Appellants N September 1, 2017 Daniel A. Seff, Esq. Murphy Sullivan Kronk P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Re: Docket Number: 114-8-17 — In re: The Snyder Group, Inc Dear Mr. Seff: Pursuant to Rule 5(b) (4) (A) of the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings (also see 24 V.S.A. §4471(c)), the following is a list of "interested persons" for the above referenced proceeding. You are instructed by that Rule to serve a copy of your client's notice of appeal upon all people or entities listed below, by certified mail. Name Street City & State Zip Code Chris Snyder 4076 Shelburne Rd. Ste. 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Rowe 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 -Andy William Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Scollins 214 Meadowood Dr. So. Burlington, VT 05403 Daniel Seff, Esq. P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Chris Bohlman 31 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 -Gary Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Jamieson Goodwin unknown unknown unknown Kathleen Sawtelle 1300 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Sawtelle 1300 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 J. Bonanno 1250 Spear Street I South Burlington, VT 05403 Hilla Danum 1250 Spear Street I So. Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.41 06 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com When the Applicant sent out their notices on the above referenced applications, the additional people or entities on the attached list were provided a copy of the DRB notice (this list may or may not include the persons noted above who appeared at the DRB hearings). Lastly, I recommend that you consult the statutory definition for "interested persons" contained in 24 V.S.A. §4465(b). If you believe that our list is missing someone who has interested persons status in this proceeding, you should consider sending them a copy of the notice of appeal, so that you can be confident that all persons or entities who are entitled to notice have received it. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, r eaymond tJ.Be air Administrative Officer cc: Vermont Environmental Court Andrew Bolduc, Esq., City Attorney 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Final Plat Application Spear Meadows Abutter List UVM & State Agricultural College Kathleen Sawtelle 1350 Spear, LLC c/o Campus Planning Services 1300 Spear Street Gary Farrell . 109 South Prospect Street South Burlington,VT 05403 Spear Street SSoutout h Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington, VT 05405 Robert & Tammy Avonda B. Grabowski & J. Milot William & Maureen Gilbert 1317 Spear Street 112 Springhouse Road 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Linda Young Richard Tarrant & Tracy Appleton Kenneth Miller 1402 Spear Street 1404 Spear Street 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Muhr Trust Margareta Dencker Pinnacle At Spear HOA 1408 Spear Street P.O. Box 1682 P.O. Box 9481 South Burlington, VT 05403 Olney, MD 20830-1682 South Burlington, VT 05407 John Larkin City of South Burlington Ila Isham Estate 410 Shelburne Road Planning & Zoning Dept 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Thomas & Louise Kleh, Life Estate Michael & Mary Scollins Matt & Emily Bieber 219 Meadowwood Drive 214 Meadowood Drive 26 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jillian Bohlmann Trust William & Tanya Cimonetti Arthur & Thomas Lavigne 31 Vale Drive 1393 Spear Street 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Carlos & Bridget Marroquin Susith Wijetunga 1295 Spear Street Pinnacle at Spear HOA Robert & Marjorie Skiff South Burlington, VT 05403 14 Pinnacle Drive 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Clifford & Kimberly Deetjen Diocese of Vermont 41 Springhouse Road 5 Rock Point Road Burlington, VT 05408 South Burlington, VT 05403 P:\2014\14008\City\Finahartifimteofservica\AbuttersLebds.wpd LI, %__ ��` L 1 / — i11INAE -/' y \ f' ; � �-..\,.� AO RIVED PATHUNS ` N - A )- \ \ - r.- f - „ODIOM a DONCREIE SIDEWALK ••h 3J 7DYWOUBE KIPQAV iEeEa \ I I/ 7 D,," DRAEOWb04MROT 1 l TOAVEDPATH 16I5402 � i�7YPIGL '.Nx " ""`/ 19 PAVEDPAW I- a . TYPI('AL SRIGIE FANRLY GRRIAOE HOLE — • _ VICE DRIVE LIM A STATE I AORICULIURALCOLLEOE 11N0012O / � T --';` I � J r \ L T 1 / r tEOlINq " \ OARAGEM(_ - T L m r r �. �Illrr�;��j� ,rlUr.L. ° 1 � iCLAU2WETLAND / OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR - _ \ / LOT 52 1 •ti ! W.III sLGLOW I PUBLIC OPEN SPACE `\ (FUTURE PARK) / — Cf61/lo \ ( a LOT 5 __.. T�3e�E�� - / �) • S / L J '1 I I TARRANT i • ( I / / h //5 -I\ ^� III ; 11',•,om.DE I �_�__-�`11y�/ � y � • 1 )) ' T000RIW1NNaRlt If �o T/ �W �\ .../ I T�/" --�-i - //� y^ y��.- M.oaaieR--'` I -/(0 t\ I•` •c� �-' �//•`^�..__ - �-,ter-'- µ"_' d..`_ �VI'----._...__- //1_... I �` �\�` - J/ //i� ��.`�\ • I ) � 8�tg�,,,� _ //�— ,_— __�_-- --'li`'�T.`-- il/ _>,,'J�J =_�� r,--- fill �)ii\ I I ; _ ,-III•- I n I I r /-\ \ ,•,o,nL>� `\�__ - - . -N- I - `(T' fiJ /If I I , _ i 7rll! _ - -� LAYI*-/I�I� %^i'• /A\,_\ \I // / Ill I r� /� I _ 4I —/' \ l I LEGEND PROJECT BWNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT4P. A.—NG PROPERTY LINE _ — — _ _ — — — — — WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v EDGE OF WETLAND �MJ TREELINE EXISTING CONTOUR GRAPHIC SCALE 1w o w 100 200 400 On teary 1 Incry = 1 W fl. BUILDING SUMMARY 18 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS (3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES SHEETINDEX 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN IS SIGNS & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE &UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE & UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE & UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE 5 PROFILE- SPEAR MEADOW ROAD 6 PROFILE -VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE BSTREET A 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 DETAILS &SPECIFICATIONS- STREET S 11 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS- SEWER & STORM 12 DETAILS &SPECIFICATIONS -WATER 13 SEWER PUMP STATION 14 DETAILS &SPEOFICAT I DNS-EPSC /5 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - STORM PONDS PL1 PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. ►� 4 SOILS MAP REY SOL MAPPING UMT HSG ` a cwINGTaN salt qwv D B.Aa N.T.S. GeC 4 GeB OEORGIA STONY LOAM C ."1 LA L VING ITCN CLAY D O N9 MnC MASSENA STONY SILT LOAM C 0.20 V•B VERGENNES CLAY O n4S ZONING DATA: TAX NAP PARCEL NUMBER - 141G13W PROJECT PARCEL AREA.25.9S ACRES ZONING DISTINCT- BDUTIIEAST CLMDRA T - NEIGHBORH OVERLAY DISTRICTS - WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER BASE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY • 31 UNITS 25.0 ACRES X 1.2 LINTS/ACRE • 31A UNITS PROPOSED OENSItt • 4S VATS NOTES: TIE PURPOSE OF THIS PUN IS TO PRESENT TIE OVERALL SITE LAYOUTOF THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2. SEE OTHER PLANS FOR ADDITONAL GESIGN AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. RIFA PLANS %W LATEST RLYISONS SHWW ONLY BE um OHPUPOSHOW WLOW. SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY O NA O RECORD DRAWING AN 17 2016 SPEAR MEADOWS A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON City of So. Burlington OVERALL LANDOWEAR SPEAR MEADOWS.INC. SITE PLAN 1340 SPEAR STREET SOIIT,BURUNGT0N,VT0W* APPLICANT'. THE SNYDER—, INC. 0M SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE B SHELBURNE. VT 05482 LAMOUREUgi &,.,Im. SON 14 M,Cannfti.g Engineer•, Inc. 14 Molx DGvc Eaaex lunciion, VT 05432 Tel: 802-878-0430 I Lam ABR checkEd DJG Gate 06-06-16 scale AS NOTED ,ht. n° 1 it 7 I �• I LOT 54 — r q V"-NE / I T'PN:AL,-WIDE WHTTE STRIPER FOR PARKING 3PACES LOT 51 II � I I "I / 1 LOT 52 1 a/J PUBLIC OPEN SPACE I (FUTURE PARK) A ® S �C @ 9 F 1 A LOT I / ; l� I L T_ I E I + i II I I I' I I � \ I I LEGEND ` ' PEDESTRUW SIGN Q.V114 S W V. SEE DETAILTHISSIEET) ME I LOT 51 LOT 49 I S' ,,.ocET'A OSTOP SIGN (SEE INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAIL) OCHEVRON SIGN 0V12. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OCORNER WARNING SIGN-1-1, SEE DETAIL THIS.HEFT) © PEDESTRIAN ZONE SION(W111. SEE GETAIL THIS SHEET) OPATH ENDS SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) GRAPHIC SCALE too 0 so 100 200 400 1 incM1 = 1000. I _ PR1VA'NE�WE I I I CG-.21... GE 2' SQUARESTEEL OST WITH ANCHOR GENTLE U YELLOW CENTER LINE STOP SIGN N.TS. STOP SIGN, ZJ' OFF FACE OF CURB CONCRETE CURB I sDEWAix tr WHITEsro BARro BE LOCATED 1S BACK F EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY OA 4 FT BEHIND CROSs WAIL( SEE PLAN FOR SIGN LOCATIONS 3011 30" w-2 TYPICAL PEDESTRIANZONE SIGN NTS PATH ENDS TYPICAL PAMENDS SIGN NTS RECEIVED JUN 17 2016 City of So. Burlington INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTIONDETAIL NTS • wII2 SEE PLAN FOR SIGN LOCATIONS Wt6-TIP TYPICAL CROSSWALK SIGNS NTS laa w 2B I STa RT) INSTALL 2 SIGNS TOTAL SIGN FACING SOUTH SIGN FACING WEST TYPICAL CORNER SIGNS NTS GENERAL NOTES: 1. NEW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TOP COARSE PAVEMENT SHALL BE OIMBLE AID IN ACCORDIWCE WITH THE 2011 VT AGENCY OF TRANSI O TATKIN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 3. TEMPORARYPAVEMENTMARKIN-ONBASEPAVEMENTMAYBEPAINT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON r SQUARE STEEL PORTS WITH ANCHORS. 4. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WTH MINIMUM T FEET CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AND FINISH GRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ' \eIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION I -- J 1 SEIC. SHEET 4 I i i -- ---- OUTLETSTRUCTURE TVPICAL"TONE \ 1 SEMR PLMP STATION FOREBAY SEE SNEE 13 FOR SEWER - __ / BOTTOM•3 1-MF 383.90 J STORM OIITFALL 1D'WIDE GRAVEL CE390RNE EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK Il 1 J , 1' ORIFICE=382.00 tr TIIICX IISHEUGRA / �. l tr PE WiIH E. 2• WT • 382.85 1 t a" PE WITH E.S. ( 1 VEL7- � � � INV • 383.00 1r WT• 382.00 Nv 3at li0 EXISTING WATER SERVICE •- J ^ /}l REMOVE E%ISTINO ORAVEL~ F_ DRIVE AND REPLACE WI .!;, 4 _ COORDINAMTOE WnH / \ , TOPSgL, SEE MUL 38fi r\<"' \ FTMI1 WAIERDEPARIMEM \ , 1 n } t 396 1E PEA r 1 8"SDR 35 PVC 5 2•R� '39BVALVE_(� E%ISTINO HD EAND 3B4 INV•381.50 F GARAGE TO \ / {j> 2A'PE WITHES 3a2 301 ;i J IM/=39125 \ / STORMWATER POND 8"SDR 35 PVC w I v NomAAL wareR m o V s x 1 / A } "; +;. ,,.,1 t I INV•aetss / I Set 1 si' "� FFE PIXJD • 381. / • j AY.384.00 rrii ��_ W T BFE•�3.0 y ' 3Bt�� s)ow,awATER Po"D I 1 /� / !- NORMAL WAIER•3B2.0 I f ( / / I t " � �. 3B4 oorLET Pool f / I � S >> 5� eoTTGM voNO • x1.o / s J � I ( 1 I 36 eoTr 1 / i i I € S' :�. t BPaLwnv • 3ea.ao / i/ I A v �. _ STOFE SPILLWAY 19 I ( BOTTOM•3)B.00 I ( 1 I �\ B8 J ELEV=3N. d 1j ELEV=384.5 / \ / 1 / / � \�.-�� 3T' � _ _ ♦-- - - ,11 . ( ..,,.. =T..e, ,,. ,e. � I .e ec w.ucc I. ^/ ' l.rn 7r'I+nO I !1 /-', I`� X � I UD 392. '1/ / / I / l J l \ \ D�� 0 I l b I Y „- 14 II -. B REOM.3)S00 \ 1 l '�I I1/ W I BFE. F.2 I I I 1% FFE.3B35 / / 44 c \,,�'�, ' INV•SBS / BFE•3B50 I/ 3g0 \ / " CL4552 WETLAND S I / / j l� 1 4•BFM 6� 6_.. I _ \ 424 n / 1b"PE WITN.S E. \`.\ I irv`3e3.Od FFE45 z° / A ENDDEFIrED I III ���3eo /, /I I CHANNEL I 1 32 1 wl FEE--..)0 I 1 • .ZO 1 \ �1" PE a TH E.�. /Y , 30 - - �: _ y1 I FM I 1 Vh 3 _ O R , tl tPAVED r/ I I + I �qcw8 �h 3 1 FFE.381A W4_ \ `O ^� S 3� \ 3%1 - _ I , •6 WC -... \ BFE•384.5 1\ I I f� OUT e l .10 ' FULL IENOIH OF PIPE WITNEr1D ` �- Cl}'#4 - I p f- i m \ I , I / m w ' o I o _ _ 15 WIDE U , I - I \ �•� - I / HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATON 1 A t COORDINATE CgJ51RUCTON OF FEW ' 1 ,, I- ._ q P e CL52 OI WAT 1 \ ,111\ I/ 11 J I : °I 4 / DRIVEWAY TO EXISTNG HWSE WITH ' r80155 VVf:BFIYEIt, TYP. * �\ �\ I ` 1 I _ _.-'y - Ilm =3 HOMEOWNER. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF I4" \ I + 1 � BF �1 1 GMVEL SUBBASE AND 2.r TYPE 111 PAVEMENT ',', 31/'TYPE'N CDPPER WA79t f \ 1.1.\ f I E-3Hs1 IJ 1 BERVICEacu�eraP, IT / c8#) I I V 1•A1 2+"PEWTH2s: / 11 33 w 1 I s t. 111 IFrv.3e3so I 1 32 W I 15 C' / I 1,,6TL, �'•�J 41 - `l FLMH ` \�•� yp 9t N' / II I I I°1QFj PT r-0MI f I I \ � - /1 / T) FFE.3B3.B0 11 � UFFER O•!P7/ I 1 �, I - II_ I � I CLASS 2 WETGAFn1 �r±� \..- L'\`\ ♦ `� - 3 G I-Z _ FD 1 .1 u` /// I 1 _ Im I II d 1 eucR Pl 1�; �� S / q E = 3°5.5 I II ( 31 STA. 24+00 I $ T 304.4] / J W U Y$ \ \ \m• 1 I 1 FFE • 395.0 f A e Iw 6 BFE•385.5 MATCH LINE ( , ( 40 V) 114 \ 0 \ v� 1 ETLPND _ I 1 I / I 1 - 1 k m n E+il I W w \ \O \ \ 50 FER lTYP1 1 I _ II I ,, I (J 1 SFE 3as3° SEE SHEET 3 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES �;, m 6 I FIE • 355k5 / I CATCH BASIN DATA SEWER MANHOLE DATA I W // r �_ \ \ i 1 I / s / BFE=3*1 I I 39 CB#1 CB#5 CB#10 SMH#1 SMH#4 1 \-� \'� "•+' N/ I \FFE.=5�3.Bo 1 \ 1 \ \ \ I\ PDMN / STA. 10+87, 12' LT, STA. 13-80, 12' RT. STA. 20+15, 12' RT. STA 11+50, CL STA. 15+50, CL l W RIM=388.30 RIM=38935 RIM=387.25 RIM=38991 RIM=388.87 `, t 86E3BSA_2)B'UD IN=384.80 e"UD IN=385.35 6"UD IN=383,25 6'IN 383.28 8"IN=301.08 1 1 \ \ / ( 30n,15" IN = 384.70 8" UD OUT = 386.35 15" IN = 383.05 8' OUT = 383.18 8" OUT = 380.98 '1 ( 1 \ I Im FIE •395.0 15" OUT = 384.65 WIN = 385.10 15" OUT = 383.00 1 _ 1 .zn w 1 _ \ 1 to BFE = 3ess CB #2 15" OUT = 385.D5 SMH CB # 11 STA. #124+00, CL STA. 0+33.14, CL Fnco \ \ Iz1 I REVISIONS STA. 10+87, 12' FIT. CB #8 STA. 20+15, 12' LT. RIM = 389.62 RIM = 387.8/ ;\ \ o L. RIM = 388.30 STA. 50+50, 11' RT. RIM = 387.25 12) 8" IN = 381.93 8" IN = 378.51 j \ \ \` i - _ gFD- _ \ c \ . / (2)8"UD IN=3B4.95 RIM=389.16 6" UD IN=383.25 8"OUT=381.83 8"OUT=378.41 s \ m -- �•� \ � \I �,I S SKETC USED CIEPTY$8 I EE SHEET 3 NS SHOULO a r I� xown BILax: SHEETS (2) 15" OUT = 384.90 6" UD IN=385.60 15"OUT =383.25 SMH #3 8MH #8 1 -Fo-F �Y - I \ ! s �- PRELIMINARY 6" UD OUT = 386.10 i / CB#3 6" IN=UT =3 CB#12 STA. 53-00, CL STA 22+26.34, CL= 1 T 38 - FINAL STA. 12+17,12'LT. 15"OUT=385.35 STA. 22+10,12'LT. RIM =391.65 STA 18+244g CL \ 5 Q RECORD DRAWING 6IN=384.18 RIM 1 FE•3B430 RIM=391.05 RIM=389.20 FE-3ese 1 pro} no. ' 6 UDOUT=387.05 CB#7 8'UDIN= 8" OUT 8"IN(S)=38026 1 ' 36 SPEAR MEADOWS 12 IN =384STA. 50+50, 1 TILT. LT. 6" UD OUT = 8" IN (W) = 379.61 I \ W FIE 394,80 14008 15. IN = 384.00 RIM = 389.10 18' IN = 383.65 8" OUT = 379.51 \ BFF 3e53 ` survey 15' OUT = 383.90 6" UD IN = 385.60 21V OUT = 383.60 - - / I / A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 6" UD OUT = 386.10 SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design CB # 3A 15" OUT = 385.60 CB # 13 FOUNDATION DRAIN / I'. t ABR STA. 12+49, 41'RT. STA. 22+75, 12'RT. MANHOLE DATA os w ( - GRAPHIC SCALE drown 12"OUT=381.30 CB#8 RIM=389.85 \ 37 - SITE PLAN & checked 6"UD IN FDMH #4 FDMH fF7 l - - _ zn I \ \\ '�'o 30 0 1s 90 120 ABR STA. 16+64, 12' RT. RIM = 392.5 RIM = 387.0 �"' CB#4 RIM =388.00 8"UD OUT = 8'IN/OUT=383.25 (2)6'IN=382.30 ,� m ( UTILITIES -NORTH STA. 13+80, 12' LT. (2)6" UD IN = 384.00 18" IN = 384.05 RIM=389.35 18"OUT=384.00 ..)OUT -38230 ,\� 1 ¢- m (in teal) DUO 15" OUT = 383 75 FDMH #5 - tlOta 8' UO IN = 385.35 - w `9� 1 inch = 3oe. RIM-3890 FDMH #8 E%ISTNG HOUSE AND �\ 1 ( 06-06-16 6" UD OUT = 386.35 GARAGE TO BE REMOVED ' \ I� CB#B 8"IN/OUT=381.80 RIM=389.0 15" IN = 384.85 STA. 16+64 12' LT. ,� 16 scale FDMH #6 8"IN/OUT=384.20 ( �I 1 / u LAMOUREUX&DICKINSON AS NOTED 15"OUT = 384.80 TEMPORARY PAVED 4- K Consulting Engineers, Inc. nt. n0. RIM RIM=386.0 FDMH#B TURFlARg1Np � \ � :��\ (2)6" UD IN = 384.00 6" IN/OUT = 383.20 RIM = 388.1 1 nl 14 Morse Drive 15' O = =383.55 .._ / / 15" OUT = 383.50 8" IN/OUT = 382.53 % _ Essex 478i44 0 05452 / S0. Burn Te1:802-878-0450 2 1 . i SEESHEET4 l / \ / �\ •.• ._-... __I r1 ,/ /���\\ /-w w \ CON RUCTION OF PAVED PATH ,l THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY i i 'DIGSAFE'PRIGR TO ANY EXCAVATION �' �Ti -�� vT C+1# REMOVE TREES FOR ( CONSTRUCTION OF PAVED PATH PAM PROPOBEDPAVED �..•,���,,�(`EMEM \\ / ��"� ~w � '! �.�'�r �- - v "` S' m / - / `To cm OF soum 6URLNOTON. /---.._„ BRANCHES ON IXL4RNG TREE83EET SIDFIINE OF EASEMENTSHKLBES Syp / r `_r I BET0.NMEDTOAHEK;HT OF IO FEET WEST OF CONSTRUCTED PATH ALONGTHENEWPAVEDPATH np _ - - l j- END CIR,B _ _ M LOT 53" ,gV° , p-.`- - aBe IR'm \ LOT - 394 y 7 -I (_ _3g6- _.. __ _ �. ' ,8.. Z1 +S �•iq �c / _EASEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTH `•, _ ,_ -- - �' BURLINOTON r 396-- _. _ r I : I 12 _ - BP q I I I 11 FFE-38B50 FFE=3eB.z I BFE=3BD.0 13 20 \ r 10 I eFE-3BB.7 I l___-_.3 r�,/ / la BBE•3eBD r / (&• CB \ ,. _.. � _. _ _ � _ -' - • BFE=98B.2 g l FFE-3BB.4"394 I COPPEgWATER I .. / 14 BM-388.8 _SERADEa CURB.ATOP ____A �/ FEE -3B8.011 / / g 19 II , ♦ • _� ___ H BFE=38B5 O TYP AL&wTER w 3Be ti FFE-b - BPE-W.3 6 'S I FFE=388.2 IFFE=9888 I BFE •388.) ♦ - { �1#" __.-- __ _, - I 17 18 1 ^ 16 FPE.3Be.T9 / BFE 38629 MIN ,.- •\ TYP. S•SDR35 R b -1 vo -- . _ =%c �cB NS g $ PVC-R m \ _ > ' ;Rr.-.•allow, \�pit mm ,I'f ' 111 all 101 �. ;..J � DEPREBSEDCUNt]_ _ JJ / DLABB2WETLAND SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO EACH MIMING WITH THE OWNER AND ARCHRECNML N - SB- - FDCow..3B19 i ( PLANS. - / Be- 2 - PPoORTOCONSTRUCTIO,THEELEVATKN80FTHE8EWERANDFOODNGDRAINERVICE1 COMPAREDTDMECIXLECfgNMIJWµDSERVICE85H°WNBON-I EPIANB. REE�ANY THE - I END DEFINED CHANNEL DIBCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER I J . S. COORDINATE THE LOGTION OF THE SIDEWALL(ENIMNCES TO EACH BUODBNl WIM TIE -- /T OWNE0.. UNLESS STEPS ARE PROPOBED,THE MN(IM11M 8LOPE ON NlY81DEWM1(IB B,L ._ •-T .... _..-"._-�.�_._ � .-.._..�.-.. "- •.-•'�•.•-• -- 9LOPE90RFATERTNAN S%MAY RC-DUIREAHAND RAL ""% / .. ..... -..-.. -..-.. -..-.. _. _..-. - •- .-..- -.. �. - 4. DETECTABLE WARNNO RATES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE END OF ALL SIDEWAU(AND - ..i _.I 8TRENA•CHAH,I'IEL ClF3S2 WETUWD SHALL eE CONSTRUCTED FOR PAVEDPATH&ANDATCRAS,ALKRAMPS.DETECTABLEWARNNGPLATESSHALLBE . -.•� -- � CAST IRON. FOR PAVED PATHB,ASEOAENT OF CONCRETE LOT 51 INSTALLATION OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING PLATE8. 24' PE WITH E.S. IN=98T.N S THE CONTRACTORPHASE (SENVEALL PROVIDEATERSSTUBS BEYOND PHASE LLMIT9 FOR PTJDIRE FXTENSKN 0M. �_40 INTO OTHER PHASES (SEWER WATER ST00.M,IA, ETC.). FBI 8. COORDINATE UIILLTYMMNSAND SERVICES WTMTHE DEVELOPERAND UTILRTY COMPANY. CUB 2 i. NEW STREET LIGHrPOLBS AND FDDURES SHALL CONFORM WITH THE MGM WOFM ^ /) •�_� -_ - -SB. - STANDARDS. LEGEND I L.,� SEWER MANHOLE DATA CATCH BASIN DATA 10•WIDEGRAVELPATH ' REVISIONS #1 s - SMH#7 SMH0 CB#14 CB#17 CB # NEW SEWER LINE TO PUBLK:OPEN SPACE 21 CB -s ® I ,.I (SEE CROSS COUNTRY THESE PLANS NIRI LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD #M STA. 24+50, CL STA. 31+M, CL STA 25+00, 12' RT. STA. 26-78.75, 12' LT. STA, 31+30, 23 5' RT. STA, 34+50, 12' LT. NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE _ I 1 PATI1 CROSS SECTION) ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHDWN BELOW: SHEETS RIM=392.00 RIM =393,48 RIM =392.10 RIM =393.90 RIM =392.50 RIM =394. 30 WIN =381A8 8'IN=385,26 6" UD IN=386,10 6" UD IN=389.90 (2)6"UD IN -__ __ -- Q SKETCH CONCEPT (2)6" UD IN = 389.00 _ _ �'_ - - - _ _ = NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE 8 UNDERDRAIN B"OUT=381.38 8"OUT=3B5.16 fi LID OUT=389.10 6 UD OUT=390.90 15"IN=38&65 15"OUT=390.55 t^'I� �,� - �.-/ PRELIMINARY SMH#8 SMH#11 15' IN = 387 40 15' OUT = 389.40 15" IN = 38&65 490 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR 1 STA. 26+50, CL STA. 33+00, CL 18' IN = 385.25 15" OUT = 388.60 l , -\\ Q FINAL RIM=394.00 RIM=395.8'6 18"OUT=385.20 CB#18 W H NEW WATER MAIN BHYDRANT y/ I �� _ Q RECORD DRAWING STA. 28+g8, 12' RT. CB # 22 - - 8" IN = 382S8 6' IN = 386.10 FM NEW FORCEMAIN / pro} 8 'OUT = 382.48 tI OUT = 386.00 CB # 15 RIM = 395.80 STA. 31+30, 12' LT. _ _ PROJECT PROPERTY LINE , r l � / \\ i ^ SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 STA, 25+00, 12' LT. (2)6" UD IN = 391.80 RIM = 393.00 _ SMH #9 RIM = 392.10 15" IN = 387.35 (2)6" UD IN = 389.00 - - PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 1 / ( survey STA. 29+29, CL 6" UD IN = 388.10 15" OUT = 387.30 15" OUT = 388.85 ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE i A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D -- - RIM = 396.00 6" UD OUT = 389,10 LOT 52 \ -- SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design 8"IN=384.08 15"OUT=38760 CB#19 CB#23 * PROPOSED STREET LIGHT \�/ , ABR 8" OUT = 383.98 STA, 30+21, 12' LT. STA. 33+00, 12' RT. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE �' tlrown CB#16 RIM 394.30 RIM =395.50 EXISTING TREE LINE .�PII�� �# SITE PLAN & ABR STA. 26+78.75, 12'RT. 6 UDO T390 =390 15'IN DOUT =39150-------390 EXISTING CONTOUR � C■ Checked RIM = 39390 6 UD OUT = 391.30 75' IN = 389.60 - - WETLAND BUFFER I Yarn ■�sw FOUNDATION DRAIN 6'UD IN=389.90 12"IN=388.00 15'OUT=388.55 WETLAND BOUNDARY , UTILITIES - SOUTH DJO MANHOLE DATA 6• UD OUT = 39o9 0 I s IN = 388.00 dote W EXISTING WATER LINE 15" IN (E)=389.20 15"OUT=387.95 ca#24 GRAPHIC SCALE F DMH39 FDMH#3 06-06-16 15" IN = (W) = 386.20 STA. 34+50, 12' RT. -9 0 S EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE &SEWER LINE q ///��� RIM = 397.0 RIM = 395.5 30 a 15 30 60 120 if R,� 17 2016 SCOIe 18" OUT = 386.15 CB # 20 RIM = 394.30 UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE JI u 6" IN/OUT = 386.50 6" IN/OUT = 384.50 z0' RIM = 393.70 15"IUD IN = 390 40 LAMOUREUX & r,, In, SON AS NOTED 12" OUT = 389.50 15" IN = 39040 -x X- EXISTING FENCE Consultin En RIM FDMH#8 g ginecrs, Inc. shl, no RIM=396.0 RIM =3800 15"OUT =390.35 -----------= EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT (in feet) 14 M.-Dove ' 6"1N/OUT=385.70 6"IN/OUT=384.20 1 inc1,=30 ft. .s vx uncpon, '105452 City of So. Burlington Td. 802-878-0450 K -- ------------ - ---------- \ j X _ - �'�_ _ _ r - \-+a - -�-- I- - PAVED PATH NEW 19 co 386 9P WIGS I111LRY FASEMENTTO ' ... � ; �-380-THE GTYa SGNHSIIRLINGTON -. e'eGR1a PVClEVIETL IY'P. \\ `�.... "\ SERVICE%'G%iERWATER W / UNNERSITYLTURN- OLLEGEAIE \ \\ AOWCULTUI� COLLEGE \ SERY10Eacu+BSTOP.TYP. ATER -`?!B� / W__ WXVTA-- SLEEVE &VALVE \\ I 1 / `\ \\\\ SEE SHEET 2' -` SM SORa&P D vAI� ! pSERVICE \ \r / / TRANSMISSIONM/1 RN9MI98YON I PLAN OF CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN I txn - ,... i-.- ----- a __• _ ! +--,9jt'I-\�-\_. ,., f' / See _ \ , ! \ BEVERPIR,F STAIgN i SIR EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK I GRAPHIC SCALE 30 o 15 fi0 12a (In fee& 1 incM1 • 30 R. I ! STORMWATER FOND I I LEGEND —s�S— o--ED---------- -- NEW SEWER LINE B MANHOLE NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE — _ -------{-� NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE& UNDERDRAIN FINISH GRADE CONTOUR NEW WATER MAIN & HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE �� UD OLEANDur INV • 9n.aa - Yt pe! .. PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE J _ - INV- NPA PINNACLE AT SPEAR I \ I I/ - - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE IW ���F�371M 11YDRANf i �'\ 1 ------'390------- EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING - _ TOOCAGREXJSMNGP / I / CONTOUR _ e,01 is PA \- 1 t WETLAND WETLAND BOUNDARY i WA}� W TERw66TTll11BB,ERFORM EXPLORATO1tY EXCAVATIONPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION f ADJUBT EXISTING SMNTO 1 I NEW FINISH GRADE r�J ,.. = =- / 7-'"NE _ TG OETE EXACT LOCATION - r I 1 1 W EXISTING WATER LINE m ale I,y —S©b— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE �- EXISTINGSIENNIIALK `'�' UTILITY POLE 8 OVERHEAD WIRE sad REMOVED -X X— EXISTING FENCE - - - - - EXISTING CATCH BASIN& CULVERT M �' � / _ J _ '?`'--181- \ / \\ SEE SHEET 3 FOR NOTES cy<�iyF / I _' _� ' S _ _-39 I THE CONTRACTOR I. b I - ....: REVISIONS 'aJ SHALL NOTIFY r) / �a0 - 'OIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION 11ESE RAMS NIIN LATEST REWSIONS SNOIILO / OF �/ �/ _ / (n� _ __ n+DD ONLY BE USED FW THE RMPOSC SHOW 9ELOM SHEETS SEE SHEET 3 8 Q/ q� I / / VALE DRIVE O SKETCH/CONCEPT 1 J J I/---�\ M PRELIMINARY FER / / �•PE1 -I=_S. �-- ``_� T- FINAL ITY .ra - " DRIVE CATCH BASIN DATA O RECORD DRAWING FOREWTINOVACANTLOTI- pro} no. CB # 26 EXISTING CB #29 �— SPEAR MEADOWS '°°°B STA. 40+47, 13.75' RT. STA. 40+50, 19' RT. / a �j .j \ / / POTE?g1AL%UTURE DRNS _ -/�\ CONSTRICT PEW RIM-394.80 EXIST. RIM=394.52 sure 0 / /� I ClASb2 N'ERAND / t_ `\ i I /�� 810604 Xluw 6"UD IN=390.80 NEW RIM =395.40 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 1 / \ 398--' IO(191NG LXiIIF i7'OUT 389.25 VUD IN=390.52 SPEAR STREET &VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLI NGTON tlesi9n - __ TO REwl1 CFD IN=390.82 ABR EXISTING PAVEMENFJGJRB. \ - 1 -"1 I 1 STA 40+47, 73.75' LT. NEWT IN=389.00 drawn SX1EJ_vA1xARo1R1D - 17' OUT = 368.57 / RIM=394.7, SITE PLAN &UTILITIES ABR rTD IiE REMOVED y/ \ '' \ CONSTRUCT DRNE NO DRIVE, NEW COORSTIREDINµAT°EWTH HHOOMEDAN R 16z OUT =39G.25 EXISTINGCB#28 PINNACLE AT SPEAR & OheCketl (MINIMUM IC GRAVEL SUBBASE --,,,_-.- __ - " STA. 40+50, 19'LT, DJG TV 29 TYPE PAVEEENr //�'-` EXIST. RIM=394.84 X-COUNTRY WATERLINE tlate �- -.. .I-------- NEW RIM=395.45 06-06-16 GRAPHIC SCALE _ \_ ; \\\�\\ �\ ^I J 1 "UDIN=39169 scale V I'D IN = 391,54 ao 0 15 30 so 120 NEW 12^ IN = 390.00 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED 17' OUT = 389.64 Consulting Engineers, I- ht. no. 14 M.- Do,,. 2016 ,F 13—Juncmo, VT 05452 TeI: 802-879450 4 I IncM1•30 R. VVVI QLY w SrL- .,urlington ,arvc PVT STA = 10-92.33 PVI STA = 12+22.21 tar vc PVI STA = 16+64 PVI ELEV = 388.18 A.D. = 5.00 PVI ELEV = 392.08 PVI STA = 13+50 2 PVI ELEV = 388.30 A.D. =-4.73 PVI ELEV=389.87 w 8 A.D. = 1.25 K=16.00 m K=21.14 ^ Y A.D.=1.23 P$ K=40.15 saw �v m K=81.32 m>,�a sn vc >m H 394 3" f O1 m N U> U F W w >> Cam n, a> 0, n .1 m N a Z 0 N 1 g > UU 3 b ^, m 392392 $gy 0 U > y > w S -1.73 °° w e N m > > > m y w m m w�r W. N N 390 - _ - FINISH RADE -0.50% m FINISH GRADE 390 — —______ u 0.7 X 388 388 FROM OUTLET TO FR CB WS O TO CB f1 STORMWATER PON TC CBWI EXISTING G_ROUNO ` ------� ' 388 388 I I �—S = 056 FTIFT Fk/STING _� OUTLET O V 730k15' PE S = 0.006 FT/FT 160' t5' PE V GROUND _ STORM TER POND S = 0.005 FT/FT �— FROM CB #B T CB $5 - _ 384 8" CL 3B4 T--� 250k8' SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FT/FT TER 382 382 S = 0.005 FROM SM 7 27ft SDR35 PVC S = .005 FT/FT — 380 380 378 N 378 376 378 TYPICAL STRI T FINISH GRADE ELEV TION DATUM MZV 374 S74.00 a IS s a 8 10-00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16.00 17+00 18+00 REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST RE AONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOB THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW.- SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY 0 FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING w SPEAR MEADOWS prof no. s;°08 8 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D U n SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design = A- ABR PROFILE R��E��"' GNed SPEAR MEADOW ROAD date GRAPHIC SCALE 3D a ,s 30 4D J U N 17 2016 06-06-16 scale —--� LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED I` C.Mrulting Engineers, Ise. t. n o' (in feet) 14 M— Drive City of So. Burlington E,=x laoeuon, Vf 0M52 Td. 802-97944M CENTERLINE ROAD 398 FINISH GRADE d 398 h r 396 + % ^ 396 394 O rn = EXISTING 394 392 ry ry w a r FROM C8W17 GROUND Ri w ry m 1. 392 r d CENTERLINE RO ry i < m _ _ — — — ----- -------- m to FINISH GRADE % J H U _------- FROM CB #15 ,4 = TO CBW74 --------- 390 f -------- V 388 % m _ NNE ATER cq --- 388 EXISTING ; Z _ --�— -- — -- — — _ --- S = 0.005 FTIFT 219'z15' PE 388 GROUND — _ S = 0.005 FTIFT 179k18' PE FROM CB 11 — - _ - m S = 0.0051 FTIFT 388 226k78' PE — — — — — — — — p —5=0.007 FT —5=0. 51 FT/FT 384 E 88'z I r PE V 1 S O'z75^ PE —� = .008 FT/Fi 778' 8" SDR35 PVC S 0.005 FT/ 384 g^ GL52 DI WATER 382 OUTLET TO R35 PVC S = 0.005 FT/FT 382 OUT T TO STORMWATER POND Y23kg' SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT 380 STOF IWAIER POND 193'z8' DR35 PVC S = O. FT/FT 380 378 FROM SMH W4 m 378 TO SEWER PUMP ST TION 376 TYPICAL STRE ETCENTERUNE 378 FINISH GRADE DATUM II8Y 574.00 374 8 ug 8 9 S 9 S 8 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 28+00 27+00 28+00 PVI STA = 31+35.69 PVI tLtV = 3W.2d PVI STA = 34+50 PVI ELEV = 392.98 A.D. =-3.25 PVI ELEV = 394.39 tar vc A.D. = 3.49 K = toa 30.77 vc A. D. = 2.50 g PVI STA=29+00 K=28.62 K=40.00 'rvs$ PVI ELEV=396.50 X's larvc larvc w A.D.=-2.49 ry m $ n 06 U ry 0 K= 40.10 W m m m r W u w 41 'B YI Q U> U YI 398 m vi U U ti w w di W Q U 398 w YI 1VV a m m N W m 398 398 w • -1.49% u c ro # GRADE a it FINISH 00% � 394 my m / � 394 U t c O FROM C W20 382 — ---- TOCB 19 FROM W25 T TO CB #24 _ — — — — — _ ---------- —— FRO 0 CB #22 C� --- — — —— —�� --�— --— -- S k 0.005 FT/FT — 5015 — --� --- 390 II 3e0 APHIC SCALE /FT 180'z15 ---------- — - 0.005 FTIFT 118z1S E V388 C152 w a ts8'CL52 — 0.005 FPFT120'z15-8• tPVC DI388386 388 0.0050 FT/FT 384 m 384 } REVISIONS THESE PUNS WITH 382 y0 LATEST REVISIONS SHOULDf OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SROWN BELOW: SHEETS N � u, 382 E:1 SKETCH/CONCEPT pj0 PRELIMINARY 380 0 FINAL m 380 El RECORD DRAWING 378 pro} no. SPEAR MEADOWS P"008 376 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 378 SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design A 376 BR PROFILE ABRn 374 374 <:+ VALE DRIVE checker 0.te s w E IVE STA.20+00-35+50 1. 06e06-16 scale T 1 LAMOUREUX & DICIUNSON AS NOTED 2016 Consulting Engineers, 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 ,! d I— t. no 14 M.— Dme Esscz luncGoR VT 05452 Tel: 802-876-0450 .✓. ✓Vrcre swJ �Ve4 q PVI STA =37a50 $ T PVI ELEV=388.14 A.D.=-2.23 ti > > K = 44.77 > > w A� w m F $ CENTERLINE ROAD X a Q m F FINISH GRADE p x N rn O Z 398 — 398 396 396 394 394 392 392 390 390 388 388 386 386 384 384 382 382 3g0 378 380 378 376 374 376 374 36+00 37i00 38+00 VALE DRIVE 39+00 40100 41+00 STA. 35+50 - 41+00 0i RECEIVED JUN 17 2016 City of So. Burlington REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REWSNINS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL LLI RECORD DRAWING DAjw00 J U) SPEAR MEADOWS s'u400B U A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 2 Q o - SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON des'9O AIR [C PROFILE 50+00 51+00 52*00 53.00 ABR ABR VALE DRIVE 41+00) `eked GRAPHIC SCALE (35+50 — STREET'A' 30 15 o so & STREET'A' date 06-06-16 e..o LAMOUREUX & DICRINSON scale AS NOTED i �ncn=son. CoasallinRRnginaen. Inc. W Morse Dme sht. na. Essex luncUon, VT 05452 Tcl: BOb878-0450 — �\ � m W y w W. - -�� EXISTIN GROUND D.IV.T Z I i I - --- --- 2 A I I 8"CL52 DI WgTER EXIST. B' ___SD I I - (I WATER S7 I I FROM CB #26 TO EXISTING CB 35 PVC STUB -SDR35 EXIST. B•---- PVC _ a EXISTST. ip• pE APPRO IMATE LOCATION OF EXIS71 WATER 8 SEWER MAINS UE1S TYPICAL STRE T CENTERLINE FINISH GRADE ie �Y r U a F � 2a ' m S 394 m 392 392 y FINISH GRADE 0.85% —�--- — 390 ------ — 390 GROUND 3B8 ------- --- - - - - � G E%IBnN _i Z 388 - - FROM CB #8 O m 3B8 TO CB #5 FROM CB#7 OCB WB A 52 DI WATER 384 384 382 �_.- 301'x8" S R35 PVC 0,0 1 FT/F 382 380 380 378 ---- L� i aw — . — sa• — — � 1�� --- —se TYPICAL WETLAND aPo a L Ifr \ 1 — ,�BUFFER TO EMARKED A T _ - -- -- STREETTREE r D --11 (TYPK) TYPIDAL %` GRAPHIC SCALE .�'•_�.�..� BUFFER TO BE MARKED 1 / so 0 23 SO 100 200 Sg T r (SEE NOTES THIS SHEET) Lxrr nutrs In -a cell -,,.. 1 BOT IL — — T ps l I r r WETLAND BUFFER DELINEATION 11}jjjr JJJ THE WETLAND BUFFERSHALL BE MARKED IN THE LOCATIONS SHONNVA OFTHEFOLLGMETHODS: BOULDERS HAVING A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF Sw MAXIM AND A UM SPACIN -SPLIT RAIL FENCE RED CHDKEBERRY OR WINTERBERRY SHRUBS AT A SPACING OF 4 FEE' t 1 RIVER BIRCH TREES 1—111 CALIPER) AT A SPACING OF 11 FIE ET O.C. �I / 9uA I _ I / FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS 1 1 / � 1. AMINIMUMOF ISDECIDUOUS SHRUBS ANDI2 EVERGREENSHRUB _ I i in 10QR 1 I J r FLANTED FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT. THE CUMULATIVE NUMBER OF PLA BUILDING CONTAINING MULTIPLE DWELUNG UNITS MAY BE APPORTIONE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING BASED UPON THE LOCATION OF NANOOWS DECKS, RETAINING WALLS. AND OTHER SITE CONDTONS. 2. PLANTS SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE LISTS BELOW, BASED UPO 9 PS BUILD ING'SEXPOSURE. A MINIMUM OF 2 SPECIES SHALL BE SELECTED GROUP (DEGDUWSSHRUBS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBS) FOR SUNNY UNITS FACING SOUTH AND WEST '�'" i f l Bean/esl Name Com on Name m DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 4PG d I EVERGREEN SHRUBS / B � B Bm.a—,P.I., 113 / FOR SHADY UNITS FACING NORTH AND EAST _ � �\ / Bobniral Name Common Name Size DECIDUOUS SHRUBS S' ,y BPG EVERGREEN SHRUBS v'mac TR T..f _-- umeNlr.,1,3 I / wa M......om esun rnwmmr \ it BPC w ` ,..,/ // // c•Bw mmeUwiw� HEDGE TO REMAIOF SMH EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC INSET l% w PLANT LIST Bq JTAAVMedN C,_m mlmr I ANW.& S.-I— AP AoeaA..+m,X'A,w ew Fo®M�dv 2V1•-TCd Hf,B,bbN AL B.W..�W.Hma.' PivsBt3 2U2•-3.OW SAS.bbo[bm Ligho3a4�tenm AR Acerubr 2td.Aw.Y A44BimKM41r 2I 3'Cel B.A Aa[AmcMgTMSM1I W 214•-YCd HAQbAe[ Ltl OT GbeRMAbewAez_. H..W— 2 VJ•-YM BS „b brt lVs AjrgAaAa Tbpbb 21B•-YCd BAe,bfoo[ . IC HwSmieuY 9eim0_ 214•-YCri BAB,bi bnmch'via6oAY1 OR 0aeaaa mE434w BETme ftee— 21/J•-rM B2B,brm1 IMCRE - UNaa__, IIMbpsaAmhmWe 21/1•-YCrt BBB.bbst Lsedr 2, ET O.C. AN ANe&Itm 1A4rm PB 4bbeNi& BAB TO _e_ Be` 141 IWmaola WMYMm ab6 eld�t BAB TA TVbmreRaaa Amdrr B�wOrb 21/1. 3•CrL BAB TO TT Jr oofaomTb Wlpv Nabm TVYKe Crbe 4bbem�3 BAe memlrbe TRIM STREET TREES RA TD PROVIDE 6 FEET BETWEEN THE GROUND AND LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES: THE THE FIRST TREE BRANCH 1. TIE PIIRPOSE OFTHIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPIND FORTB: ROADS AND THE PROPOSED UNITS. SEE OTTER PLAN SXEETB FOR STREETAND URTTY DESIGN INFORMATION. LIMB FREE TRUNK 2. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED TO PRESENT THE LANDSCAPING RAN CONCEPTS. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANTINGS MAY BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO INSTALIATON WE 10711E CONSIRUCTEO LOCATION OF THE HOMES. FINAL GMDING, RETNNING TREE PIT 27HICK MULCH A MINIMUM WALLS. AID"UTIES. �Oi 6" FROM TRUNK VNW V V N CUT AND REMOVE WIRE MESH BASKET. CUT AND REMOVE ROPE AN UNDISTURBED SOIL BURLAP WRAP FROM TDP 2D/OOF ROOTBALL AFTER PLACEMENT IN TREE PIT. LOOSEN REMAINING BURLAP TO ALLOW _ FOR R007 DEVELOPMENT. REVISIONS = BREAK APART EDGE OF THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD OF EWSZTION ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: $NEC15 'MOMEL I I AND BLEND PLANT MIX 3 X BALL DIA WITH Exlsnnc sal To L:j SKETCH/CONCEPT PROVIDE SOIL TRANSITION MPRELIMINARY 1. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT ME TRUNK FLARE 15 VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF Q FINAL THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REaEC7ED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. RECORD DRAWING 2. STAKING REWIRED ONLY IN SITUATIONS THERE TREES WILL BE SUBJECTED TO "NOY CONDITIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. STAKES SHALL BE SPEAR MEADOWS Pro} no. 14008 REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, survey 3. TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER PLANTING. A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 4. EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS. TREE WRAP. ROPE, STRING SPEAR STREET 8 VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design AND SURVEYOR TAPE PRIOR TO PLANTING TO PREVENT GROUND. ABR drown 5. THERE SHALL BE NO WATERING BERM INSTALLED AROUND TREES. ABR 6. PLANT MIX SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING RATIO: 3 PARTS EXISTING SOIL, 1 PART AN LANDSCAPE PLAN checked 70TOPSOIL�. DJG ]. TREE PIT TO BE 3 TIMES AS WIDE AS ROOT BALL. dote S. PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR CRUSHED ROOTS AND DEAD OR INJURED BRANCHES. 08-08-18 SCole TREE PLANTING DETAIL U 7 2016 LAMOUREUgi & DON Consulting Engineers,, Inc. Nc. AS NOTED NTS 14 Morse Olive � At. no. Essex Juncaoq VTO5452 Tel: —7"50 \V yr o � t v 4- �. / v � /' _�S _ r. �""`a.w, - � �♦ zaa� - _�� �' � - � 1 _ SEE INSET BELOW FOR \ r...--/ �•,• 7 I -��� _ _�_-'� Y �- `" _ --�-� - l '�` REMAINDER OF VALE DRIVE WOODS�q •_-' WOODS x� za _- -t _ - Y r.-- •x .� ."',- , �v. J WNSLOPE `"- I I CLASS WETLMA � - - �� v _-� -_'"�" �, - ♦ ♦ T MEADOW TEMPO Y ST ILIZED \ / - A p \ ALE DR B�DN CONS UCTION \, J ��� IVE P A F MEADOW h_ I MEADOW A / Y, STORMWATERP�ND I _� — .�—�— — --'M— —.__ MEADOW l ` BUILDING CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF REQUIREMENTS: OR TO GRASS SWALES THE AFEA RECENING RUNOFF (LAM OR BWALE VEAUL BE BED TERR/JN -' TEMPORARILY pTPERMANF_NTLY STABILIZED BEFORE RECEIVING RUNOFF. - _ MutSl4/ i .._\ •" O 2WEBLANO 2. TEMPORARY DNERSION OF ROOFTOP ftI1NOFF OR RUNOFF FROM THE WILDING MEADOW _ CLAA.42WETLAND CLASS WETLAND / R '� /^ /�_._.. ♦- MEADOW J 1. THE BRMWATEATION NS BASINS SHEUSED AS CONSEDICTED TO OHE SINS GRADES SH-CONSTRUCTION. 1.THE BEDIMEMATgJBA31NS A DEPTH CONSTRUCTEDTO THE GRADES SHOWN, EXCEPTTHAT THE FOREBAY SHALL BE STON CAVATED P1ADEPTH OF ITHE FOOT BELOW THE GRADESILIZET 2. TYPE I STONE RLL MAY BE DUE TO FLUCTUATING UCTHE BASIN SIDESLEV ES TO STABILIZE THE SOIL IF VEGETATION DOES NOT BECOME ESF $ED HED IXH THE FLU EMYSN MALL BE MONITORED ED THROUGHOUT THE BASIN. S. TIE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IN THE FOREBAYS SHALL BE MOMTORED THROUGIHOIfT CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN IT REACHES A DEPTH OF 2 FEET. 4. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM THE BASIN SHALL BE DISPOSED IN AN UPLAND LOCATION ON A SLOPE LESS THAN 3% AND NO LESS THAN SO FEET FROM A WETLAND OR STREAM. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED / \ ST,R •'ETA f /' IMMEDIATELY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATIVECOVER. —L� I I / l I � i�_—ExISTTND HOUSE PTO BE REMOVEDIS / \ •`' 4 - r/ // / \ `• / / I 0 MEADOW \ I'O '�' • I DEVELOLOTP CLASS 2 WETLAND y/I ( 1 r •+ \ q MEADOW 'TIi ( // A VACANT' L A l \ 1 DEVELOPS HOT'" _ DEVELOPED LpT --- / -- — _—i— RECEBVE I 1UN 17 2016 CONSTRUCTION AREA FRAY SE NECESSARY WRING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION OR FORTHETREATMEWOFCONSTRUCTN MERUNOFF. THERECEMNGAREASHALLBE TEMPORARILY DR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED PRKKRTO FS:tENNO ANY CVERTED RUNOFF. 3. WHERE ROOFGUTTERSWU_BEUSED. BUTARENOTIN PIACE,ASTONE DRIP EDGESWTLL 4. PROVDED TO MATTING HALJ_ ON. 4. EROSION SUCH TO TRUNOFPI CED DIRECTALLROOF STABILITTER EDMDOWNSPOUT ATEJD LOCATIONS AND 5. EMEND SUCH THAT RUNOFF E DIRECTED IN AL ONTO lS ST ERE S D OR VEGETATED SURFACE B. EROSION WU.REMATTINSHALL N BE COMAE PLACED I7EDFLO AS WHERE SURFACE SPACING AROUND THE BUILDINGS WILL RESULT IN CONCENTRATED FLOW. LEGEND STABLIZED CONS, RUCTNMI E%IT • • • TEMPORARY SILT FENCE u LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE BTA9 LZEOSTAGING/STORAGE EROSION MATTING CB INLET PROMCTgN NOTE: THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MARKED WTR14' ORANGE POLYESTER BARRIER TAPE, CONSTRUCTION FENCE, OR SNOW FENCE, E)rGEPT IN AREAS WTIHIN SD FEET OF A PRESERVED WETLAND ORSTRFJIM WHERE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE USED Tt1 MARK THE UMTB OF DISTURBANCE. GRAPHIC SCALE REVISIONS THESE PUNS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD } OF ONLY 8E USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY ED FINAL El RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS prof. no. a.r-y A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON Oesi9n ASR drown EROSION PROTECTION AND ABR SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ec c)JGked date 06-06-16 scale LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED Con..Ring Engin—, Inc 14 Morse hive Essex Junction VT05452 Tel: 602-878-g450 .� TYPICAL STREET CROSS-SECTIONNOTES GENERAL CONSTRUCTIONSPECIFICATIONS RIGHraF-W4Y R R 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRY PUBLIC WORKS 1) UTILRY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AND 1U' S PAVED PATH GREENSPACE SEE PLANS GREEN SPA SPECIFICATIONS. THE 2011 VERMONT STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. AND THE APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. MAY OR MAY NOT BE EITHER ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATIO OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE 70 ANY UTILITY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY �t I 2. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE CURB WHERE IT WILL BE IN CONTACT NEW TAP LOCATIONS AND SHALL CONNECT ALL UTILITIES TO NEAREST SOURCE THROUGH O 4' DOUBLE YELLOW LINE WITH THE PAVEMENT. COORDINATION WITH UTILITY OWNER. a'TaPSVIL. TYP. I I I 3. EMULSKNI WILL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE BASE AND FINISH COATS OF PAVEMENT WHEN 2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING o r THICK TYPE III FH INS I I TN FINISH COURSE IS HOT PLACED IMMEDATELY AFTER THE BASE COURSE PLACEMENT. VEGETATION. PAVEMENT. AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK UNLESS ] CLXIRSE PAVEMENT 4. THE STREET FINISH GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5% NOTED ON THESE PLANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH FROM SITE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY SURFACES, LINES OR STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE BEEN t 5' CONCRETE Y`FHI KTYPEIBASE CURB COUtSE PAVEMENT y. WHERE LEDGE EXISTS IT SHALL 8E SHATTERED TO A MINIMUM OF 2'-B" BELOW SUBGRADF:. DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT IN WHICH THEY WERE FOUND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF x s OOa YELLOW OR ORANGE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE BURIED 15" ABOVE ALL GAS. ELECTRIC. CONSTRUCTION. f - — TELEPHONE AND T.V, LINES 3) SEE OTHER DETAIL SHEETS OF THESE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS, REQUIREMENTS AND 7. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE UNDERDRNS, THE FABRIC AND GRAVEL. THE CONTRACTORCIFICATIONS. N SPE MIRAFI(KOK GEDTEXTRE 2 t�3 Hi' � "� �� . � E I I SKILL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR INSPECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH A DUMP TRUCK FOR TRAVELING THE A) ALL WORK SHALL N IN ACCORDANCE W" THE 2011 VERMONT AGENCY OF (CAR APPROVED EQUAL) 1'T1ICK TYPE IV FINISH - --113 LOADED ON SUBGRADE WHEN THE ENGINEER PERFORMS THE INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS LOFT CONSTRUCTN]N, THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THESE PLANS. —E PAVEMENT I I OVER -EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE SOILS AND ADD ADDITIONAL SAND RASE AS REQUESTED BY MINMIM Ir FABRICOVERLAP 1 t THCK TYPE III BASE MINIMUM 2I FABRIC 117NCKGRAVELBASE OVERLAP (AS PEN BTATE THE ENGINEER. 5) A MINIMUM ONE-WAY SHt MAINTAINED AT ALL TARES. CONTINUOUS COURSE PAVEMENT LF D NOT U E UMI STONE DONOT115E LIOREQUA � L. FINE) E]IMWDq i]NMFINE) 8. PRIOR TQ PLACEMENT OF BORROW OR GRAVEL BASE MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR ETRAFFICREQUIRED TWO-WAY TRAFFIC WILL A NI A .PEAK- REQUIRED AT NIGHT, PEN( -MIXERS, END WHENEVER POSSIBLE MIRAFl MBAR FABRIC aREWAL S'THCI(GRTE tr THCK SAN) LAND $MALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER A GRADATION ANALYSIS FOR EACH MATERIAL SWINGE TO C DURING ACTUAL O CEN ENGINEER, KFORED T PEENED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER, MUNICIPALITY OR ENGINEER, A UNIFORMED TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER SHALL DIRECT (AS PER STATE SPEC SPEC X]00 M OR M]91 f15 FINE) B•PERF. PVC SM S5 BORROW AS PER IY MIN STATE SPEC. LE'al 3A) OWpiER BE USED DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED SPECIFICATION. THIS GRADATION TRAFFIC DURING PEAK HOURS. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL ANALYSIS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MATERIAL TO BE USED. SUBSEQUENT SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ON -SITE MATERIAL IN PUCE FOR GRADATION ANALYSIS SIGNS SMALL BE ERECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND TOWN STANDARDS. BY THE ENGINEER. PUBLIC STREET WITH PATH TYPICAL ACTION S.ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALE RECEIVE TWO COATS OF 8) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT HIS OR HER OWN EXPENSE FOR ENSURING THAT THE DUST CREATED RESULT MITI -$PALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD. AS A OF CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR SAFETY HAZARD. WERE AND WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE rvTs 10. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON PUBLIC STREETS SMALL BE DURABLE MARKINGS (3Y TAPE). REOUIREO TO WET SECTORS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH WATER, APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE, OR SWEEP THE ROADWAY WITM A POWER BROOM FOR MST CONTROL. TEMPORARY PUNT MARKINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON BASE COURSE PAVEMENT. m 7) THE CONTRACTOR SMALL THE ENGINEER 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE STARTING ANY R RIONT4F-WAY R LEDGE REMOVAL SPECIFICATIONS PAVEMENT.NOTIFYBEGINNING N OF ANY S. ANY NEW UCHAVELING ORSTONE NFOR NTHE NEW (RASE, PAVING, ALL TESTING, ANDRFINA INGING IN 1' S' SEE PUNS SEE PLANS SEE PLANS INSPECTION, IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PUNS. CONCRETE ALL HEDGE BLASTING REMOVAL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT 8) PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SIDEWALK q SIOLWALK TIO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ENGINEER AND THE CRY. P DDUBE VELLOWUNE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ROCK, IF ENCOUNTERED, TO THE LINES AND GRADES INDICATED 9) ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 8 INCH LIFTS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO 95% OF PTOMOIL, TYP, I ON THE PUNS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THE ROCK MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY AASMTO T-99 5'TIFCK 3509 PSI i11 THCK TYPE In FINSH "MN I AND BACKFILL WITH ACCEPTABLE WTERW,. ROCK IN PIPE TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED STANDARD PROCTOR AND SHALL BE TESTED AT 500' INTERVALS. UNLESS OTHERWISE CONCRETE SIDEWALK COURSE PAVEMENT SO SD AS NOT TO BE 1ACC THAN SIX INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE AFTER IT HAS SPECIFIED. (S• THCK AT DRIVES) CONCRETE BASE 10)BACKTLL UNDER PIPES IN FILL AREAS SWILL BE COMPACTED TO CCURSENMTYPEII CURB ® COURSE PAVEMENT Ji� ROCK EXCAVATION SHALL MEAN BOULDERS EXCEEDING ONE CUBIC YARD IN VOLUME OR SOLID LEDGE ROCK, WHICHM, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, REQUIRES ffs REMOVAL DRILUNG AND BLASTING. WEDGING. SLEDGING, OR BARRING. NO HARDPAN. SOFT. BE IN ALLEDMAXIMUO DENSITY OF OPTIMUM D SNRE CONTENT. THE PIPES SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED OVER ADEQUATELY COMPACTED SOILS. S ....... —_ OR DISINTORATED ROCK WHICH CAN BE REMOVED WITH A PICK; LOOSE. SHAKEN. OR 11)THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED, J " J, 4 I PREVIOUSLY BLASTED ROCK OR BROKEN STONE SMALLER THAN ONE CUBIC YARD IN MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO AND AFTER EVERT RAINFALL T ',� t , ,�, � x M I i � ROCKFlLLING OR ELSEWHERE; AND NO ROCKS EMERIOR TO THE MAXIMUM LIMITS OF EXCAVATIONS BY THE APPROVED BY THE ENONEER WHOM MAY FALL INTO THE TTHE AREAS HAVE BEEN EROSION UNTIL ALL DISTURBED MAINTENANCE COR GRASSED CONTROL DEVICES ILL INCLUDE THE ENGINEER. THE Ma E OF H ROS N M CE WILL I LU HE (ORAFIPROVED SEE PLANS FOR TRENCH OR OTHER EXGVATONS, WILL BE MEASURED OR ALLOWED AS ROCK EXCAVATION. REMOVAL OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTATION. (OR APPROVED EQUAL) EO AL) I'NKXL GRAVEL BASE Ns J SIDEWALK LOCATION I IN ROCK EXCAVATION, IT IS ESPECIALLY REWIRED THAT BUSTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED 12)CONSTRUCTON OBSERVATION AND CERTIFICATION IS OFTEN REWIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL PER STATE SPEC .nN M AINMUM 24•FABRIC 8'TMO(GHAVEL 845E WITH ALL POSSIBLE CAN SO AS TO AVOID INJURY TO PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT ROCK PERMITS. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS DETAILED ON ORAo4DSFlNE) OVERLAP AS PER STATE SPEC. ATw.oe OR na.DS FlH=) SHALL BE WELL COVERED DARN EFFECTIVE ARPLIANCES: THAT SUFFICIENT WARNING STALL BE THESE PLANS BE OBSERVED BY tAMOUREUX ! DICKWSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. IrM GIVEN TO ALL PERSONS IN THE VICINITY OF WORK BEFORE BLASTING; THAT CARE SHALL BE (LQO) TO OETERMINE IF ME WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ASAND SPER 1�}-�— BORROWAS PB'MIN TAKE TO INJURE WATER PIPES, GAS PIPES, SEWERS. DRAINS. OR OTHER STRUCTURES APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. L&D WAIVES ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR PROBLEMS THAT MY ARISE FROM: FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE PLANS AND STATE SPEC. nosoM) AN CAPS AND THAT CAPS OR OTHERR PRIMERS SHALL NOT BE KEPT IN THE SAME PEACE WHERE DYNAMITESPECIFICATIONS AND THE DESIGN INTENT THAT THEY CONVEY, ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PUBLIC NTREET WITH NIDEWALK OR OTNR EXPLOSIVES ARE STORED. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS WITHOUT L@D'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT, AND/OR FAILURE TO SCHEDULE SECTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL LAWS AND ORDINANCES RELATING 70 STORAGE OBSERVATION OF THE WORK AND TESTING PROGRESS. NTs AND HANDLING OF EXPLOSIVES. 13)THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL 1/4- RADIUS 8" 1/2' pADOs PRIOR 70 PAVING. THE PORTION OF CURBING UNIT OR LOT CURB CUTS AND PIPE SERVICES WITH THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 2.� TO BE R CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE COATED WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. -______________- 14)ALLLOPES.OF DITCHESGRADEDSMOOTH, CLEAR AND TS WITH D DISTURBEDFFICIENT ARE S SHALL. B DRAINAGE. LE-'d---BQCN-TE NOTES 1) CURSING SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED N 10' SECTORS WITH 1/e" JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS 2) CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF "TERM CONFORMING TO AASMTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2" SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK) 3) ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND ALTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD (APPROXIMATELY 28 DAYS) CONCRETE CURB SIDEWALK RAMP WITH BROOM FINISH SURFACE B B I_ J C II' ^C^ CRASS STRR CONCRETE CURB DETECTABLE A WARNING SURFACE SIDEWALK RAMP W BROOM FINISH SUE SINGLE RAMP ON TANGENT, NARROW OR NO GRASS STRIP 1/2" RADIUS- 7APER 7' \\i 'N �--FINISH GRADE 10"J INSTALL AT ALL•ENDS OF°CURB SECTIONS 1B'J TYPICAL TAPERED CURB SIDEWALK RAMP yhi S� MAX 1/4" REVEAL w< a ROADWAY SURFACE 83 ;MAXIMUM . Section A -A CURB AMDtMpY _ AIPMIARY RAID MN WI' RAV POIIIIL'N6 () CONCRETE CURB IYPK+W- $eClion B-B DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SINGLE RAMP ON CORNER RADIUS, NARROW GRASS STRIP BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CURB. NIDEWALK RAMP NTS 1D MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE TOOVERHANGINO BRANCHES, WIRES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. t' — SHOULDER E MINIMUM HORI20NTAL CLEARANCE BOTH SIDES TO TREES""U""ES.POLES. SIGN WALLS. FENCES. HYOR,ANTS. SKdNS.OR OTHER ORSTRUCTOHS. 2 11' BITLMINGUS PAVEMENT V TYPE IV WEARING COARSE 1 1D' TYPE I I LASE COURSE 6' 10 1' SHOULDER S _ B.BB] i I1S SCX DENSEE GGRACED�HED� VEL \ PLANT MAL I NSE GRASS TYPICAL 1' SHOULDER: r OF G TOPSOIL AND PLANT DENSE GRASS (BOTH SIDES) Z'RADIUS CONCRETE CURB MIRAFINKILFASNU NOTE FINE CRUSHFDGRAVELHAVING ADEPTH CFUPT04'MAY MUSED APPROVED EQUAL FOR FINE GRAVING ON TOP OF THE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE SEE BELOW dR009 COUNTRY PAVED PATH MOOS OECTION r Ns IS° RA 1F LMAIN ST. SECTION A- 2D• DES[ PLANS ONLT ff USCD DLB/FT GALVANIZED CHANNEL POST 0 SKETCH/I � PRELIMIN/ STREET _ _ 90EUNE 9 (� FINAL STREET SIGNS TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN PATH AND CURB 2 B_GUS CONCRETE OURB TRAN9nd1 2" DUCK BT"S IOUs CONCRETE 80, SIDES SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE III APR OVER I_ YIN. WITH DETECTABLE GRA55 GRAVEL BA (VAOT SPEC. MS WARNING SURFACE A]04.05 FINE R A L ' XO,W /� 2jg is-�l I 'Fl3 l' WEED) BAND IRON 2Sfay L (F LL ET WEIR) CONCRETE CURB Section C-C fTRENCH W N 1 7 ZO 1B1ryV NOTE: ATTES SHALL BE CAST IRON. DRIVEWAY SURFACE DRIVEWAY APRON & CURB CUT STREET NAME SIGN ARTS N.T.S. uIry of So. Burlington ORWNO AMHOUE FRAME a sal° COVER WITH EPRE-CAST OR POURED IN -PLACE 3500 PSI CONCRETE NOTE: ON CROSS-COUNTRY GASKET LABELLEDD'STORM" ANN0.E MauE A COVER BET Rush WITH BASE RISER BETWEEN C.B. TOP AND BOTTOM GE CAST IRON SEWER LINES. RIMS SHALL /NlElAU R16N2, LEBARON COURSE PAVEMENT FRAME. MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE B INCHES (BRICKS SE A M Of fi AROSE LC266 OR E.- RWI9H CAACE SHALL NOT BE USED. ) FINISH GRADE y NO pARcnc O N1EROR HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON FILL GAP WIN GROUT IN. CAADE BIRIfXNCAUI OR JOINTS H, MORTAR SHALL AGA ATE UNT FRAME E NEW CURB SHALL REST ON TOP ff NLONED CRWT FRAME CRATE. SE CAB;ADE .� i0 RISER GRATE WHERE SLOPE 5%V OF CURB AS REOUIREBASIN DO R - AR�ST XEIONT OROUT FRAME ADJUST RY WIN ] WHERE THERE 6 NO CURB, TOPSOIL AND GRASS To LASER CONCAEE RISERS ')p TO BASIN AND USE 4 FLANGE FRAME no.CRT E MTx 26' FINISH GRADE cONCIETE PoSEHS OPENNC ' THE IIW FABRIC SHALL COMPLETELY N- AST.M, C476 ENVELOPE THE STONE UNOERDRAIN TRENCH PRECAST RENFORLi° HEAVY DUTY CAST MFA IRON AD CONPUART - 16" ON THE 90ES,BOTTW,TOP AND ENDS CWI EXTERIOR O CONOEIE CONE, 4ANXOE P CA51 NFINIZLED OATH ,WO (2) GOATS OF CONE AND RISER FRAME N GRATE CRWT FRAME TO CONCRETE CONE LIANxaE WAIEPPROG SEALANT -O FABRIC ENVELOPE TYPICAL COY :v+o RIYn ME FRAME OPENING SMALL MATCH FINISH GRADE ME CAT BASIN TOP MTN NO ,'-C CD "E. OVERHANG N� N AT Y aC EACH WAIT _YPROPYIENE COFOLYMER SEE SPEafIGTIp6 PLASTIC RUNGS WITH 1 1�2 6' UD CLEANOLT MINIMUM V HIGHER POLYPROPYLENE FOR Mn 1E51MG 1/2' GRADE eD STEEL GROUT FRAME TO RISER THAN®OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN. P�ASREQUIREY[N13 NEVI OR —VA IES 1/Y GRADCD60 STEEL EQUAL, 12' I.C. ALL BACKRLL THOROUGHLY 6' UD IM 3X 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. REINFORCEMENT OR ADJUST RIM WITH COMPACTED IN 6' LiIS BITUDOUBLE LAYER O E ' O.C.8 U.D. QUAL t2 1 AT 6' O.L. EAGH WAY O PoNO RUBBER I M I gALMANII ALLI�oITS CONCRETE RIYRS 1 A — wBKET IN—ORDAxa (1 )' ADM) I-2 �. . NIL TM. OOR AND Y--I I�—�IN 5.� ASI.M CK OR PMOTTFFOR ALLSTORMPI�R _--_ E I �Tn E CAST IN PLACE RUBBER GASKET 6' OR LARGER IN OlAMETER - SAYE ELEVARdi`y5 wELOD STEEL CURE FA&tIC SHALL BE USED AROUND ALL FABRIC I FABRIC UNDERDRNN IN A WELDED 51EEL wRE FABRIC GRANULAR BAGRu FGI ALL BACKFLL STORY SEWER PIPES STRU(t S SHALL BE NOROKRLY COMPACTED 3a 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. ORPROXED NATIVE YAll. N 6' UFTS A.ST,M C476 PRECAST 24' OR VTRARS SPEC 704.06 VARIABLE STANDARD 31 5 - 0.239/4 VOIF. CONCRETE STRUCTURE RAT 6' O.C. EACH WAY vRECASi COxpEtE OAST N PUSa VARIABLE STANDARD 14 6 12' SHELF AND INMERT RIABER GASKET FOR STANDARD PROVIDE WAERTGIT LENGTHS ATENIpNT Y.H. LENGTHS RUBBER NOT FOR ALL (1.2.3 W 4 FT.) .�.�'.;. UNDISTURBED SOIL CW9T. (1M. ALL APES) (1,2,3 4 4 FT.) STORY PIPES 6' OR A.ST.M CQB PREGST 2' HIM (MAX) LARGER IN CONCRETE STRUCTURE /5 AT 6' O C. EACH WAY CHANNEL EXTEND BEDDING TO �RL FOR VARIABLE LEDGE PAYMENT UNIT 3/4- CRUSHED STONE BEDDINSTANMARDG UYITS OF EXCAVATION MEW, ,o..De D Dn 3•_ xuc LExcnHs • . - UIDOE (2} • A IT.) 6. . .Au 1t 4. 1r 6. UNIT S / e' LEO(E PAYMENT E%TEND BEDDING TO NOTE; GTCH BA9N5 MAY BE LARGER THAN 940M ON MIS DETAIL LED¢ PAYMENT LIMIT UYIT 3/4' CRUSHED STONE BEDDING LIMITS O' EXCAVATION tY / 17 WITH MULIPLE ON LARGER DIAMETER PIPES IN ONE STRUCTURE. PRECAST MONGINIC r / /, �EIEMeAff IYIH 2• , / / 5Y r /' // CONGEE BASE MIN. 2' • / / SIT' // CXVVC ,/e' TD ,/: HENHT. `� 1/I' giuSNED STONE BEOdxG PRECAST CATCHBASIN (YARD) PRECAST CATCH BASIN i4 wA°a 11 CRUSHED 1/4NUEsioi�i N e 6' ac. VTRANs SPEC. IOAD2B EACH WAY NTS NTS EXTEND BfDDI 10 EX1DID REDOING lD OUTS O EXCAYAlIU1 OUTS OF EXCAVATION TYPICAL PRECAST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TYPICAL PRECAST STORM MANHOLE NTS NTS USE PVC PIPE OR PRESSURE LOCATED 2' X TO GE NARK LOCATION AND DEPTH SANITARY & STORM SPECIFICATIONS SERVIM CONNECTION. EXTEND FROM PLUG TO 2' ABOVE FINAL GRADE I) INDICATE AND SHE PLANS. PIPES SHALL O BE R 5 C AND TYPE Y-HY I I YMFRHDIE '� /,\ RNG TO ASTIA D-3034. ASTYTOE32ilN ASTIM PVC F-,n7 CORRUGTTED�APPE SHALL RARER HALL PROPERTY ONE CONFORM TO AASITO 11-19O FOR ACCGIP PIPE AMID AASHTO M-246 TYPE B OWL) OR EASEMENI IV FOR POLYMERIC COALED STEEL PIPE. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE SHALL / PROVIDE COVER MARKED BOUNDARY CONFORM TO AASITO M294, TYPE S (SMOOTH LINED). 'SEWER' OR 'STORM2) ALL NEW GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE LEAK TESTED BY ,I 6' MINIMUM SERVICE SDR 35 PVC CONNECTION A LOW PRESSURE NR TEST AND DEFLECTION TESTED. THE LOW ',ll"jl I FINISHED GRADE PAVEMENT OR GRASS THE PRESAIRE AIR TEST WILL BE USED TO SIMULATE INFILTRATION OR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TEMPORARY E%FILTRATIW N70 OR OUT OF ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS ALL SHALL RUN PERPENDICULAR I PLPLUG Yij I M THERE MAN TO AT LEAST TESTASMNC6 B AIR 1G N BE ME MINIMUM DUCTED NDER THE ALLOLTRF TIMERVISION OF FORACCOPRERDHE ANCE DROP ME SHEET LINE CNGNEE 2 AIR TESTING SHALL AL PERFORMED N ACCORDNUCE WIN PROVIDE WATERTIGHT FROM 35 PSI TO 2.5 PO SHALL BE 1.2 MINUTES PER 100 FEET OF 5-1/4- DIAMETER X 36- CAR 6' SEWER AFTER THE FINAL BACKFILL HAS BEEN N PLACE AT I I TALL VALVE FBOXLANGE. TOP LEAST 30 DAYS. THE SHALL EXCEED AA DEFLECTECTION ON OF FIVETMAY PERCENT PERFORMED.).FTE NO PIPE WITH A TOP fLANCE. INSTALL 3/4• INSTALL BOX FLUSH WITH CRUSHED STONE LEDGE PAYMENT DEFLECTION LEST 6 RUN USING A RIGID BALL DR MANDREL IT FINISH GRADE SUPPORT FOR VALVE UNIT SHALL SHALL HAVE A . THE EQUAL TO E OF ME INSIDE DIAMETER Q< THE PIPE. ME TEST SMALL SE PERFORMED WITHOUT AS NOTED BOX TOP " /�/��/��/ MECHANIC PULLING DENIMS. ALL MANAGE AND PIPELINE MAMPoALS, MANHOLE CHANNEL ON PLANS 12' MINI UM SLOPE 1/4-/FT STATE STANDARDS AND THEY PLANS uEMODS AND TESTING SMALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY AND —6' �r I FOG SANITARY SEWER OR NTS 1/6'/FT FOR UNDERORAN PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3) ALL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE TESTED PRIOR TO LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT UNDERORNN CARRIER CONSTRUCTION OF THE INVERT BY NE VACUUM TEST MENOD PIPE ON SANITARY DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPCOPCATIONS HOLES FOR MAN SEWER YAN UP TO 10' DEEP ME MORMON ALLOWED TIME FOR A VACUUM DROP SEE SEWER MA NCN DETAIL W NOT CONNECT UNDERORAN FOR SEWER MAN AND SERVICE FROM 10' 10 9' O DEEP NE SHALL SE 2 WED TIME FOR MANHOLES FLOW TO SANITARY YMEfl Mr BEDDING DETAILS 2 MINUTEGREATER S AND 1330 MCPON� MIHIIIINI ALLOWED TIME SHALL BE SANITARY SEWER OR UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL (STORM & SEWER) SERVICE CONNECTION NTS NTS FINS -DE PLAN VIEW FINISH GRADE NIS UNDSTURBEO SOIL �� MA11 BACKTLL WIN APPROVED UNDISTURBED BOIL PROFILE VIEW REVISIONS ExCA" I MATE-1. I NTS THESE PUNS MORN UTEST ACVISIONS SHOULD / G NTHOR LIFTS COIPACIEO IF THE SANITARY SEWER PIPE IS LOCATED ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELDW: SNEER 6' li3 �I BACKFLL WITH APPROVED ABOVE ME WATER PPE, ME YWER PIPE EXCAVATED MATERIAL � SKETCH/CONCEPT MORWOHLY COMPACTED �I JOINTS ON EACH SDE aF ME WATER MAN THE Say O MENOHES nl M 6' UlIS I SHALL BE CONCRETE ENGSED (YE PLAN 4 FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH IF LOSER 61E54 MAN 51/i. TI SANITARY SEWER = 10• MIN, - YEW) PRELIMINARY ENTEREO BY PERSONNEL W RACE A- N. INSULAED \ STORM SEWER � 5' N. � SHALL BE SHEETED N !I EDAM, VIAL IS SUITABLE I < SLOPED To TIE AN¢E _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FOR BIAaA oMR PIPE THE SUES a TRENCHES FINAL OF REPOY N No OASE SMALL T1a pllt AFT. OR uDIE N DEPTH rc O STORM OR SANITARY YMER PPE RECORD DRAWING OF 6 HAVE LESS THAN 4' COVER ENTERED BY PERSONNEL ODV[R tE55 1HAN 5 t/Y. 12' I OVER THE LWwN SHALL BE SHEETED OR I PLAGE A' THICK MSAAED ; 1IY MN. Pro} no. APPROVED NOOK FREE SUOK�TTOO 7IE ANOE _ _ _ _ _ _ BD:Vm, WHICH 6 SAYABLE 1w �. SPEAR MEADOWS '.DOB DIAMETER IS R OF F FOR BU16AL OVER PIPE. ______ BACKPLL NDIIWG,LY DIAMETER OF - -• -- WATER MAN 9ufvey REVS (�No S ORES 6 1 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D LARGER NAR 1 1/2' _-�-_ STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PIPE 16' YIN. DIAMETER APPROVED ROCK FREE BAOKnU- DIAMETER IS WT90E ) - J-_ O66i n 6. gAYEIEfl a PPE SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 TIME COMPACTED IN 8' UF15 (NO O STORM OR SANITARY SEWER PIPE ABR ME CONTRACTOR SHALL AT STONES LARGER THAN 1 1/2' aC ENTIRELY SEKEPOFHWATER TRENCHES DIAMETER) F _ ___ To* MN, L,F ME SANITARY YWEft PIPE 6lOCATEO DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONSAER 3/4' CRUSHED STONE UNM ALL WORIf IS FIMOHEO \ ALL TINES KEEP THE MENCHES A P P chhecked AND READY FOR BAO(FILUNC TF THE CONMACTdR SHALL AT yNGLE 20' NOMNAL AROSE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PPE Zi LENGTH O WATER PIPE JOINTS A EACH ODE OF THE WATER LEDGE PAYAENT UNIT a EM ALL 6 FNGI ED MAIN SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED .V` '. S • �G DH2 FEET 3/6' GRIUSHED STONE AND READY FOR BACKFIUMG - 'I L-- =- SEWER & STORM Oo,e UNDISTURBED SOL BEDDING LEDGE DGE PAYMENT UNIT ecDle UNDISTURBED SOL °i2 FEETJ U N 2016 AS NOTED LA LPL DICKINSON WATER / SEWER PIPE CROSSING 14 M.inR Eng nee W, I.R. h(. no. TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER TRENCH TYPICAL STORM SEWER &DRAIN TRENCH 4Mnree DHve NTS NTS NTS E., Junction, VTOS452 Cityof So. BurlingtonTel 802.67&4450 11 WATER DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 GENERAL: CAST RON WAR MARKED WATER This item Moll c sisl of the labor. equipment, and material required fin the complete construction of the wolermaina and s which shall include a -lion, bacniling, pipe, wl.s. tees. hydronts. elbows, ecklmos, and all other appurtenance. spry far a complete walerm it ,yet- as indicated on the accepted drawing,. All matermis and installations sholl be approved by the local municipal wotw authority. 1.2 WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIALS DUCTILE ISRON PIPE Pips hall be a minimum diomeler of eight inches (6") and conl«m to currml AWWA C600 and ANSI Specification A21.51. Push-- joint pipe all be minimum thickness Class 52. Pipe shall be cement mart« -lined an the inside in accordance with AWWA C151.51 « ANSI S ,Gift anon A21.4 apt that the cement -lining thickness Mall n 1 be less than three-eiktmnths inch (3/16"). A plus tolerance of one -eighths inch (1/8") will be perm;lled. 1.3 FITTINGS: Ductile Iran filtinga anal) be c enl-Iin,d, how 350 P... do -king pressure, and be ;n cordonce with AWWA C-110/ANSI A21.10 and AWWA C152/ANSI 21.53 for compact fittings. Mechanical 'pint note and Dot, shall be high atrenglh, low alloy sfeel ps ANSI A- 21.11 , Ductile iron fitting° larger than twelw inches (12") Moll Dow a standard body length equal to Class 250 coal Iran fitting,. Cast bin Class 250 filling. will be allowed in fisu of ductile iron fittings in sizes larger than twelve inchse (12"). Megoug retainer gland, or an approved equal h,II be used on all wiled Demos and as Mown an the plans. 1.4 AT VALVE RESILIENT SEAT: GATE Gale wives Mall be AMA C 509 Standard Gale VEI w, with mechanical joints If 'I'm ix as raquked on the plan. All wlwe aholl be of Cast or ductile k body, parallel brae. sects, non -tieing stem, inside screw, double disk construction with '0' Ring Stem Seals. All wIwN to be equipped with o wive boa faro of 5.5' of c motmial. The gale wlws Mall open left and be &signed for D -king 1prea,ure of 200 pal, Each wlw Moll how maker, n e, p,msure rating, and year in which manufactured asl an the Doily. Prior 1. shipment from the factory, each wlw shall be tested by hydrostatic preswre equal to twice the specified working preswre. Buried wlw, Mdl be installed with a wl- bok. 1.5 VALVE BOXES: Cost e- it• n threpi.t. Yore -type; fiw and one-fourth, inch (5 1/4") shalt; si. foot (6') trench depth Cast kan cover marked "WATER" and indicating direction of opening. 1.6 FIRE HYDRANTS: All by&. to a e to be 3-way. 5" m m diameter and limited to the Idloring m.kw: W='er Pacer, Mueller Super Centurion or Kennedy C-did, K-81D, and Mall conform Hth AWWA C502. Main Val. Opening: 5 1/4 Mee Nozzle Arrangement: Two 2 1/2 Inch A ea NST 111-ds. One 4 1/2 inch pumps, nozzle MST 11-de, Inlet Connection: 6 inch M,Ch"ical pint, MEGA -LUG and thrust bloat Operating Nut: Standard 1 1/2" pentagon Me= of Opening: Countmdackwi.e Col«: Enameled hydrant red body. lop color ors determined by Town. Depth of Bury. Hydrant shall be installed to the manufacturer.. Inst-ti... wan n-Ase about IS- chow finish grade. 1.7 HYDRANT BRANCHES: Hydrant o• Wis• Mae onsist of a inch (6") mechanical pint gat. wl- onforming to AWNA C-509; a length of si inch (6") Doss 52 ductile iron pipe with ent-6mng; and the fire hydrant. MEGA -LUG ,stair, gland, m apm.-d .goo Small b, used. Tha hydrant anal[ haw at least fifteen (15") between the bottom of the !lemma, cop and the ground. 1.0 CONSTRUCTION METHODS A, INSPECTION AND TESTING All pip, and fitting. Man be Inspected and tested in a C«dance with the PPp pnufaetureis apaificalione and the aforementiane0 AWWA Specificatian0. The Contractor Mall furnish for opprowl certification from the pipe manufacturer that all te,to haw been performed with sal;,faclory result,. Pp, shall not be installed Niihoul the Engineer's or Water Aulharit ,opprowl. B. INSTALLATION P;pes, fillings, and a m Mall be carefully handled to amid damage. Prior to the tlnle of acceptance of sthe markd work by the Oernw. the Contractor Mall replace any new pipe or accessary found to be delectiw DI any time, indud'mq it,, imralldion, d no -pones to the Ownm. All in lollotion and testing Mall be done in accordance with AWWA Standard C-600 and ANSI Specification A21.11. All pipse showing cracks Mall be rejected. If cracks occur in the pipe. the Contract« may, of his own e.pw,, and with the ppr,,d of Tne Engineer, cut off the crack" p«lions at a point of least Iwelw Mo.. (12") from the ANN, Iimite of the crack and Use the sound portion of the pipe. AI pipes and fittings shall be cleared of all foreign mdlm one door;, prim to installation and Mall be kept clean unit the time of acceptance by the Owner. At all limes, when the pipe laying is not actually in progress. the open ends of the Pipe $hall be closed by temporary wote,tight plugs or by other app,,wd mean,. If wale, is in the trend, when work is resumed, the plug Moll not be removed until oil danger al wets entering the pip, nI. Passed. The pip, Moll De installed in trenches and d the line and grade Mown an the Contract Orow;nge. Any defection joints shall be within the limits specified by the m... factu,w. AI Piping and appurtenances connected to the equipment Mall be wpp«led so that no ,train wall be imposed an the equipment. If the equi"rent monufocturela epecificoVarm, nclu0e that piping loads ar not to be traneferrea, Tne CDnlrad« !moll submit cml;fi-tion of compliance. e Concrete (Must blacks Mall be Installed an all plugs, lees, and bends deflecting 11 1/4 IT me or "I". ore Cora shall be taken to ensue that concrete WTI not come in contact with flanges, joint.. or Dvo Dolts. The required ar d thrust black, are indicated on the plane or ..If be ore approved by the Engineer. Wnenewr sewer, C,Oss undm --d- the wate,main Moll be lam at such an elewlian that the bo"com of the wotermoin is at last 18 inches obow the tap of the Thia vertical separation !hall be mdnldned for that portion of the woldmain located withi. to fast (10') N«Montally of any sewb it case... Thor, ,hall be no physical c nnecUon between the distribution system old any pipes, pumps. hydrants, or forks which or supplied w may be supplied with a water that ;e or may be, contaminated. In inetancea whine the u of different types of pipe requke joining, the Contractor Moll Iurni,h and install oil nece.... y adopter. All trenching safety Mmulmds Mal be in cwfomonce with all applicable Stale and Federal Gu;dMnse and as specified an the Plans. Tne Contractor $hall, at all time, keep the trenches entirely free Df wale, until all work is finished and ready far backfll'nq After the wrous ppMn- how been installed , the lrenche, and oths, areas to be filled Shall be baakffied to subgrode With, possible, mGimi.1 !.coveted from the trend, No backfifng will be alloyed unlll any concrete masonry has set sufficiently. as determined by the Engineer. AI material far backfilling Mall be free of roots, stumps, and frost. lAaterids used far backfilling trenches Mull be free of atones w ighim, awr 30 pounds No alone. rm.asu,irgowr a and a holf inches (1 1/2") in In longest dhn-sml Shall be placed wthin one fool (1') of the pipeline being bockfilled. Backfill for oil pipelines shall be placed In six Inch (6") layer% each layer being thoroughly compacted to not lees in,, 95 percent of m m dry density as determined by the AASHTO-7-99 Standard Procl«, Pmticulm precaution, Moll be taken ;n the placement and compaction of the backfill material in order not to damage the pipe m structure. The backSl Mall be brought up evenly. AI rotdmdn, Mall be installed with a minimum cow, depth of Ilia (6'). Surplus e... wled materials not used for DO Mill Mall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer. All ourplus 'Dismal or pol Mall be removed promptly and di,poaed of so as not to be objectionable to abutter, m to the general public. Malw bores we to be installed on all buried -1w. The bo.,s Moll be cast it with o minimum Ow and one-fourth! inch (5 1/4") diamels and long enough to !,tend from the dw to finished grade. The boxes Mail enclose the operating nut and stuffing D.. of the mlw. Val- b.-. all not transfer loads into the wlw. Co.,. shall be close filling and dirt -tight rith the lop of the cover flush with the top of the Do. rim. Co-rs shall be marked Water" with a w indicating the direction of opening. Val- home Mall be three piece slip-type. The contractor stroll proNde astable, tempormy PVC marks, approved by the En gn r at all gala valves, verb slops, and of the end of waterlines to a point si. inches (6-) ,bow finish grade. The mmker Moll be sealed securely into the ground. C. FIELD TESTING Except ore otherwise directed, oil pipelines Moll be tested. Pipelines laid in e.cawl;an d bedded in Concrete shall be tested prim to Dockfiling or the placing of crate, and any !.posed piping shall be tested prim to field pointing. The Contractor Mall furnish all gauges, testing plugs, cops, and all other necessary equpmenl and lobar to perform leakage and pressure teat in sections of a appro-d length. Each wheal wdian orof o e thousand feet (1,000) of the pipe shall be tested. All rots, requred for leafing Mall be patch,. All testing Moll be conducted in the presence of the Engire Far the pressure test, the Contractor Mall dewlap and maintain 200 pounds per square inch far two hour, Failure to hold the de,ignated pressure for the two-hour period constitutes o failure of the section tested. The leakage test Moll be performed enlly with the pressure lest, During Ina lest, the Contract« Mall m e the quantity Of water required to maintain the lest pressure Leakage shall not exceed the quantity given by. SD ,%P e 148.000 where: L - in g atlans Leakage g /hou S Pip esLength of pipeline tted 9 D - Diameter d Inches pipe in P A -.,.lest pressure in psi Al testing Mall be conducted in accordance with AWWA C-600 latest rew Should any section of the pipe foil either the preswre or leakage lasts, in. Contractor Mall do everything n sa,y to locale and repair « replace the defective pipe, filling.. Dr joints at no !.pens, to the Owner. D. DISINFECTION: Chlomotion of the rotermain Moll be conducted only after the main has been flushed and a clear streom is obtained as determined by the Engineer, The Conlraclm shall furniM all lab., aquiDment, material., and tool. n my to disinfect the pipe and opp-mondeol in cordon, with the AWWA Standard far Disinfecting Wotermoin,, C-651, with the exception of the tablet method. The method of disinfeclim Mall her by the continuous feed method Unless otherwise .Pprowd by the Engineer. After filling, Pushing, and the addition of chlorine solution, ins free chlorine cancenirolion within the pipe shall be at least 25 mg/I. The chlminoled ..for !hall re in the main hours, At for a period Of at leas) 24 houAl the end of this period, the treated water ;n all potions of the main Mall not how o ,,;dual of le.. than 10 mg/I of Tree chlorine. All di,infeclion .holl be performed under the supervision of he Engineer. The di Mlectian process !hall be seemed acceptable only after (2) somple$ d water from the pushed, disinfected main taken by the Engineer and tested at an approved labmatmy MIN no eNdence of bac mIbIogical contamination. Disin lecliol .If conform to the latest AWWA C-651 ,!wean. The F;pMno and pp., Man- Mail be maintained in an ontomirded condition until find acceptance. D;s;nfeclim shall be repealed when and where ,!gored at no e.pense to the Own, unit find acceptance by the Owner. E. FROST PROTECTION OF SHALLOW WATERLINES Wderllnes with less than I. feet (6') of C the « er 0, whe indicated an the plan% ,hall be protected against y rrsv:er ;ng by installation of lour inch (4") thick Sixdoom SM Insulating sheets with a total width of four lest (4') o Lice the pipe diameter, whichever '.greater. The Meet. Mall be placed . inch" (6") the the « of the m .Its, eampodion of the e' inch (6") hII tmmedialely abo. then •Cara .hall be ised by the Contractor during backfll and anpoction over the atyrofaom Meet, to prevent damage 1a the aneet. Styroloom SM sheets shill meet Tne compreselw strength requirements of ASTM D1621-73 and Moll be a, nulaclurod by D Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, or equiwent. In n case anon the wotMin- now loss than four feel (4') of cover Dwr the top of the pipe. MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (IN SQUARE FEET) m®®®®®®®mm®®M®®®® ®®®®®®®m®®®®®®®® : .. . i MMMZ9MMZM0MM2MMi = 3500 PSI 3500 PS CONCRETE CONCRETE END AREA BEARING END AREA J,e AGAINST BEARING UNDISTURBED AGAINST SOIL UNDISTURBED SM. TYPICAL TFES-DFADENDS-CAPS TYPICAL BL'NDS NOTE: PLACE 4 mil POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK END AREA NTS MODEL ALL DONESTIC SERNCES AND DOMESTIC FIRE SPRINKLEN SYSTEMS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE I 15' ONlO LOT PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED ACCORDING TO THEIR DEGREE OF HAZARD, es. A d CONTRACTOR'S LIMIT BACNFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, AND WTH AN APPROPRIATE NORMAL EXPANSION SYSTEM. GROUND - al BACKflLL MTH Ell 11 TYPE MKI BOX MEAN MATERIAL - WITH RUG TYPE CTTER NO LARGE THAN or \ •! STAINLESS STEEL ROD TYPE MRBSTOP MCDONALD OR BRIDGE BRASS) /4' TYPE k' COPPER " SERVICE SHOWN LEDGE PAYMENT \ WY MAN ON PLAN LIMIT 3/4' BALL 4* r 4' % 8' % 16' SOLID OURPGRAIION STOP (AY CONCRETE BLOCK NCDONAD OR CAM RI e DCE EDGE PAYMENT LIMIT /, �\ COMPRESSION FITTING BRASS) THE WATER SERVICE SHALL MAIN ROADS PRESSURE PEAPENLEAST T FROM ME MAW WATER RESLEST SHALL TO AT LEAST THE STREET LINE. BE TO THIS PONT.POIN SEE WATER TRENCH DETAIL FOR NOTES: TYPICAL BEDDING REQUIREMENTS 1. -LON THREAD SEAAMT SHALL BE USED ON ALL CORPORATION STOPS PRIOR TO INSERTION. A. SPIRAL WRAP COMPLETELY COVERING THE THREAD AREA MTH TWO NAA1 B. PIPE DOPE OR OTHER LICUID THREAD SEALANTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE 2. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL NOT BE PLACED LESS THAN 12' APART ALONG PIPE, WATER SERVICE DETAIL NTS TYPICAL 7N UST BLOCK. 4 MA, PGLYTHYLENE BETWEEN FITTINGS AND CONCRETE. THRUST BLOCK SH TO BE DETERMINED BASED UPON SOL CONDITIONS ADJUSTABIf CAST IRON VALVE BOX YO FINISH GRADE WTH COVER MKED WATER TARNG VALY CONFORMING TO AWWA C-5011, COUNTER MWKWSE OPENING MTH A WINKING PRESSURE OF 11. ML PER WATER DEPARTMENT SPEOMATIONS 3/4' CRUSHED STONE SHALL EXTEND ABOVE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX 3/4' CORPOtAHW IN FIRST LENGTH OF PIK FOR TESTING AND CHLORINATION NJ TH MECA-LUG RETAINER GLANDS OR APPROVED EWAL MN/4" CRUSHED STONE 12" DEPTH N07M 1. WET TAPS 91AL Be PERFORMED ONLY BY FIRMS APPROYO T THE WATERNT INEDEPARTMENT.MA .-CURRENTA CERIMI.. ...DIED, INSURANCE W ACCORDANCE WIN WATER DEPARTMENT REOUIRENENTS SHALL AM el BONDED. 2. TAR TAPS SHALL . A MINIMUM OF THREE PIPE QAMETERS AWAY FROM ANY JOINT W THE ^FTER FINAL PIPE TO BF. TARED. I ITUM FINAL TIGHTENING -LIE AND TESTING ALL BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL O BRUSH ACESCIGAIED TH NUTS AND COLD APPLIED MATERIAL TO MCRWCNLY COVER ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF ME NUTS AND BATS TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE UNDISTURBED SOIL BOLTED HYDRANT TEE - CONCRETE ADJUSTABLE TWO PIECE CAST RON VALA BOX TO FINISH GRADE RESILIENT SEAT 1�1 /-3/4' CRUSTED STONE SHALL EXTEND DATE vALA / ABOVE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX 0 WATER MAIN III MJ H MEGA -LUG RETANER LANDS OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE WATER TRENCH -/ `3/4 CRUSHED STONE BE JAL FOR PIPE AND MIN. 12" DEPTH BENDING REQUIREMENTS N OTESI 1 VALYS SHALL SE MANUFACTURED TO MEET AL REOUIREMEXTS OF AWWA C5a9 CURRENT E EDITION. VALYS T%ElAVALWS INCHES ME ON FPS R ( ) SMALLER SHALL BE BUBBLE TIGHT, ZERO LEAKAGE AT 200 PSI NXNtINC PRESSURE. AYES $HALL HAY NON-RROW STEMS. OPEN COUNTER CUING DI AND RONOE A HMO (Y) SOUA h OPRATHE NUT 'S AN ARROW CAST W THE METAL INDICATING DIRECTION OF OPENING EACH VALVE SHALL RAVE THE MAKER'S NAME, RHANICA RAZING ON EACH YEAR IN AND IT WAS MANUFACTURED CAST ON THE BOON. VALVES SNER L MECHANICAL JONT ON EACH END, AND SECURED TO TINE ADJONING PIPE D BY AWN DS A M PRESS RAND. L TO TO SHIPMENT FROM THE FACTORY SSUR V&A SHALL BE NESTED BY HYOtOS1wiM PRESSURE EQUAL TO TWCE THE SPECIFIED NAMING PRESSURE. 2. BUre D VALVES SHAL BE RONOED MTX A TWO INCH (2") SQUARE es ENCX NUT AND SHALL BE INSTALLED MN CAST IRDN VALY BOX AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW POSITIVE ACCESS TO THE VALY OPERATING NUT AT ALL TIMES IN INSTALATIXNS WHERE ME DEPTH FROM GRADE TO TOP OF VALVE OPERATING NUT IS GREATER THAN SX (5) FEET, A VALVE STEM RISER SHALL BE PRONDED AND INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE DEPTH FROM THE VALVE STEM RISER NUT TO GRADE IS FROM FOUR FEET TO SIX FEET (4'-B'), (MINIMUM LENGTH OF VALVE STEM RISER IS TN) FEET (2')) VAY STEM RISERS SHALL BE OF HIGH STRENGTH STAINLESS STEEL AND OF MELDED CONSTRUCTION. GATE VALVE DETAIL NTS HYDRANT MANUFACTUR TO BE APPROVED BY TER ENGINEER AND MUST HYDRANT FIAC MEET CITY STANDARDS. O GROUND VALVE BOX I 1B" Imo/ EMIT PAYMENT 6' MINIMUM WATER MAN MINIMUM 6' BURY 6" GATE VALVE THRUST / BLOCK ALL MJ GLANDS SHALL BE 'MEGALUG' OR APPROVED EQUAL SEE THRUST ° BLOCK SCHEDULE \n \ CRUSHED STONE SEE WATER TRENCH LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT FOR BEDDING 6' DIAL. D.I. PIPE RETAII REQUIREMENTS HYDRANT DETAIL ,PALM— AREAS I PAY. - NTS ToOINESS OF NEW PAYMENT AT TRENCH SHALL MATCH MM TO PAVING CUT EMSTNG PAYMENT BACK EMSTING THICKNESS AT A MINIMUM. PAYMENT LKTS SEAL CONSST O 2 1/2' TYPE Y BASE AND 1 1/2- TYPE M sE_NG COURSE PAYMENT. A MINIMUM OF 1 FT DYER EMSTIMG SUBBASE. GLEAN AND COAT EDGE OF EMSTING PAYMENT W1H EMULSION THMNEB4 OF EESTING SUBBASE OR RIOR TO PLACEMENT OF WEARING COURSE PAYMENT, GRIND EXISTING PAYMENT BACK A M.. OF Ir DENSE GRADED RUSHED STONE (VMMS SPEC. MIXIM U.OF 1 ET TO A DEPTH « 1 1R- TO STAGGER MINTS W TRENCH PAYMENT PATCH. iIMSX (BADE --------- UNDISTURSOL BED :� ji 7MIN BACKFILL .. APPROYO THE EXCAVATED MATERIAL ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ONLY BE THOROV NLY COMPACTED W 6' LIFTS ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR TH IN T I TION OF WAT R SKETC THE SIDES DP TRENCHES LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR AL WAT R PRELIM 4 FT. OR MORE IN DEPTH IF COYR R LE55 MAN s'. PLACE MIK 3- THC( WSULATON BOARD SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMP IN WAT R O FINAL ENTERED BY PERSONNEL SHALL BE 9HEE.. DR SLOPED To THE AND£ W sUTMLE FOR BURR OVER PPE. IN NO CASE SHALL ME PPE DISTRICT, THE CITY OF SOUTH B 1R IN TON COLCH T R FIR DISTRICT.AND THE RECOR OF REPOSE xHY LESS 1NAN 4' O cOYR OYRS NA LEMR. STAGGER JaxTs w ND lire JwTs ARE ONE DYER V A OF I RI -H0. THE SBWD SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILUNG TO INSPECT P E ALL JOINTS. FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, 6 OUTSIDE APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE A RESIDEN DIAMETER OF PIPE) CROSSINGS. SPEAR STREE SAND BORROW I— SPEC. W\�ENTIRELY FREE OF WATER \fir\rr\ \r\1 UNTIL ALL sORK tt FINISHED M 03) FOR D.I. PIPE. IF TRENCH- AND READY FOR EMOKIPULING Off• :�\\Ord\�\�\\\Orpr\\'�\�. UNDISTURBED Sol. LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT TYPICAL WATER TRENCH NTS JUN 17 2016 of So. Burli NOTE: HYDRANT DRAIN SHALL BE PLUGGED. PUMP STATIONDATA A. TOTAL DESIGN FLOW EPR FLOWS) 4] SINGLE FAMILY UNTS @ 210 GPD'UNT S,8i0 GPD INRLTRATON(0.43MILE .x DIP.X300GPDIIWHDA.IMILE 1,032 GPD TOTAL DESIGN FLOW = 10.802 GPD B. HEAD LOSSES STATIC LIFT • 12.OFEET FRICTIONLOSSES • 12.0 FEET MINOR LOSSES to FEET TOTAL HEAD LOSSES • 2- FEET C. PUMP REQUIREMENTS PUMPS & SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY GOJLDS OR EOIAL. USE TVA) (2) WO LOG SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PUMPING ISO GPM AT 25 FT. TDH. THE PUMPS SHALL BE GOULDS MODEL 3888D4, 15 HP THREE PHASE WITH A C FLANGED DISCHARGE CAPABLE OF PASSING 3 - SOLIDS. D. ELM P STATION ELECTRICAL SERVICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL MATERIALS AND LAEOR AS REWIRED TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL AND STATE ELECTRICAL a PLUMBING CODES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY. ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE 120VR40V, SINGLE PHASE. E. EMERGENCY STORAGE PROVIDE 4.15 HOURS STORAGE (PER CITY REQUIREMENTS), —EDON MAXIMUM DAY DELIVERY RATE OVER 16 HOURS: 1B,--DI18HR. x 4.15HOUR$ • 2.828 GAL. REWIRED STORAGE STORAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE ALARM LEVEL AND WITINOUT SURCHARGING THE INCOMING SEWER MAIN(S), STORAGE PROVIDED• 2,854 GAL. (1,8181N THE EXTERNAL STORAGE TANK AND 1 2381N THE PUMP STATIOFB. F. SUBMERSIBLE DUPLEX PUMP STATION REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLONANG OPTIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PUMP STATION: -VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE DUPLEX PUMP CONTROLLER -MULTITRODE PUHMP CONTROL -REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT -HCA SWITCH FOR EACH PUMP IN PANEL -RUN LIGHTS FOR EACH PUMP -ALARM LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACKUP - MAIN DISCONNECT SWITCH - DUPLEX CONVENIENCE OUTLETS IN PANEL - ELAPSED TIME METERS - GHTNING PROTECTION -ALTERNATINO REIAY&MANUALSWITCH TIME DELAY RELAY G. WET WELL LEVEL SENSOR TIFF RFdC SPS7EM SHALL BEMULTITRODEORAPPROVEDEWIVALENT, COMPRISING A MULTI-SENSCRED PROBE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MULETRODE CONTROLLER. THE PROBE SHALL BE SUSPENDED, WTH A STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING BRACKET AND CLEANING SQEEGEE, AND POSITIONED IN TIE RISER SECTION OF TIE WET WELL JUST BELOW THE ACCESS HATCH. A REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT SWITCH SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED IN THE WET WELL. TESTINGDATA A. FORCE MAIN PRESSURE TEST: THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO NOT LESS THAN BO PSI ATTHE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TEST SECTION, THE TEST SHALL BE OF TWO HOUR DURATION AND THE TEST PRESSURE SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN +I-5 PSI. A LEAKAGE TEST SHALL ALSO BE PERFORMED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE PRESSURE TEST. THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE FOLLOW NG FORMULA: L • (Sx D. VP) 1133,2B0 WHERE L • THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR, S IS THE LENGTH OFPIPE TESTED, D IS ME NOMINAL INSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE IN INCHES, AND P IS THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN PSI. B. PUMP STATION. VALVE PIT a EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK LEAKAGE TEST: THE SMUCTU�S SHLLL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF ME ENGINEER FOR EXFILTRAT W BY FILLING THE $TRUCTURES TO 1T BELOW THE ACCESS LID. A STASIU]ATION PERID OF FOUR HOURS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOVI FOR ABSORPTION. AT THE END OF THE STABILIZATION PERIOD THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE REFILLED AS NECESSARY AID ME TEST PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL BEGIN. AT THE END OF THE TEST PERIOD, THE VOLUME OF WATER CHANGE SHALL BE MEASURED. LI HAD VOLUME LOSE SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE -TENTH OF ONE PERCENTOF THE TANK CAPACITYKoDI x TANK VOLUME). THERE SHALL ALSO BE NO VISIBLE INFILTRATOR OR EXFILTRATION OR THE TEST FAILS. IF THE TEST FAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANDIOR WATERPROOF ON THE EXTERIOR AND RETEST. A VACUUM TEST (ISTM C-122T) SHILL BE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU CF THE WATER TEST. A VAWUM TEST WILL M RE WIRED IN LOCATIONS MMNG A HIGH WATER TABLE. C. PUMP STATW: THE CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL BE PRESENT DURING START-UP. A WATER SMIRCE SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO PERFORM A FULL OPERATIONAL CHEM OF THE STATION, INCLUDING ALL PROBE FUNCTIONS, ALARM TESTING, INDICATOR LIGHTS, MOA SWITCHES, PUMPS AND PUMP ALTERNATOR. THE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE CYCLED THROUGH MORE THAN ONCE TO VERIFY PROPER SEQUENCING AND OPERATION OF THE PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE FIELD TESTEDTOVERIFY THAT THE PUMPING LAPAgtt MEETS THE PROJECT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. NOTES I. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PUMP STATION MAY REQUIRE TEMPORARY SHEETINGAND OR DEWAMRING. NECESSARY DEWATERING TECHNIQUES SHALL BE UTILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE DRY SITE CONDITIONS, 2. THE COMPLETE OPERATION OF THE PUMP STATION AND FORCEMAM SH ALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE Vu1TH THE TESTING SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS SHEET. THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEER, CITY, PUMP MANUFACTURER, AND THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES. 3. ALL ELECTRICAL WORN SHALL MEET THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY. TO INSURE COMPLIANCE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A VERMWT LICENSED ELECTRICAL ENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK AND MATERIALS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL PERTINENT CODES, 4, ALL OPENINGS FOR PIPES ANDCONWITIN THE PUMP STATION ANDWETWELL SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEALED AM WATERTIGHT. S ALL MATERIALS LOCATED WITHIN THE W -1- SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. SPECIFICATIONS 1. PUMP STATOR, VALVE PIT AND EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK SHALL BE PRE-ENGINEERED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF VERMONTAND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND H2O WHEEL LOADINGS AT THE DEPTH SHORN ON THIS PLAN. 2. EXTERNAL EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK TO BE A HEAVY DUTY TANK, AS MANUFACTURED BY CAMP PRECAST, OR EQUAL. WALL, FLOOR B TOP THICKNESSES SHOWN HEREON ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT FLOTATION. 3. EXTERNALLY COAT ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITH TWO COATS OF MTUMINOW WATERPROOFING AND TEST FOR WATERTIGHTNESS. 4. DUCTILE IRON PIPE JOINTS OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. JOINTS INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE FLANGED. ALL PIPING INSIDE OF THE STRUCTURES AND THROUGH THE WALLS SHALL BE CLASS 51 DUCTILE IRON. 5. ALL BACWILL MATERIAL AROUND THE STRUCTURES SHALL BE SAND OR GRAVEL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 85%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHT.- STANDARD PROCTOR. WLCO, PUMP MANUFACTURER OR AN - APPROVED EQUAL ALUMINUM DUPLEX ACCESS LID AND FRAME ASSEMBLY CAST4144vLACE. PROVIDE PADLOCKS W4TH NEENAH R1142 COVER OR EC- FRAME 8 SAME KEYSET FOR ACCESS LID, CONTROL PANEL, AND POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH. SLOPE FINISH GRADE AWAY FROM VALVE PIT B. .Ilr, MORTAR WITIi NON RI K R ELEVATION 388.0 .Ili. ,III, ,BA EL-WBO _ 2'THICKSTYROFOAMSM INSULATION PANELS o CONOIIT TO SUITABLE FOR BURIAL COPOLYMERMANHOLE 2' 5'A'MINIMUM JUNCTION BOX �I FIRMLY ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE VATH ADHESIVE `STEPS®fi-12'O. C. (TYP) o 4e LD_ 6•(TYP)-- IEMERGENCY CONNECTION CAP (ANDRE- MALE ADAPTOR o IAJ00 WITH LOCKING CAP 90041Ci1) o ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED VNTM BUTYL ROPE OR A RUBBER ORING PROVIDE CONCRETE USE FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE FOR BENDS BLOCKS AT ALL -] BEIOS PIPE PENETRATIONS OF 2' W LARGER \\\\_ j/// / SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING CHECK VALVE 4'CL 51d O'CL5td PVC J 12'MIN. 5 S --PVC a 1' SON 40 PVCDRMN PIPE SOLID SLEEVE CODLING S=IIY PER FT -� A 4- FLANGED PVC QUARTER V PFLANGEDCASTIRON 4"d TURN BALL VALVE SWING CHECK VALVE, Msl UNDISTURBED EARTH DISCH FLOMATIC MODEL 78 OR ECWL VALVEPIT SIDE VIEW NTS CONDUIT TO CONTROL PANEL SENSOR MEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES P D.I. (BOTH sloes) - CAST OPENINGS STRAIGHT IN (NO-DALLY) C EMERGENCY - CONNECTIONCAP GALV., VINYL COATED VENT CAP NEENAH Ri642 FRAME 8 WITH BRONZE SCREEN (TYP.) COVER OR EQUAL RIM ELEV • 1- 4' GALV. STEEL VENT PIPE STAINLESS STEEL LIFTING CHAIN AS 4' TOP SOIL, GEED, PAINTED GREEN (TYPJ AND MU CH RECOMMENDEDPUMP MANUFACTURER. A ATTACH TO RISER. - 36- DIA. REINFORCED CONC. RISER AND FLAT TOP SAND GRAVEL BACKFILILL ONLY SENSOR MEANING S 3 SUSPENSION BRACKET S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLY B-SEWERINLET SEAL MINT W TH BUTYL ROPE OR A RUBBER O4RING AND MORTAR WITHYMM PROOF INV. ELEV =3]8.20' NON -SHRINK GROUT TO SMHpS PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL 8-MIN ------ - 30' VERTICAL PIPE SUPPORTS WITH 3IP STAINLESS THREADED ROD ANCHORED STORAGE ELEV • 378.2- ALL JOINTS SHALL BE INTO WEIVNEILL EVERY 3ON SEALED"'B"BUTYL ROPE CENTER (MIN. OF 2) ORA RUBBER OiKIHG ELEV • 3I5.2' MONOLITHIC BASE MINIMUM OF 2- HIGH MULTITRWE PROBE SENSOR STORAGE PVC TO PUMP ON STATI INV.. ELEV. 37S.2' IN' ELEV. e'EMERGENCY STORAGE CONFECTION INV. ELEV • 375.0 8' MIN SLf ALARM 8 2n4 PUMP 12' ELEV • -W (SEE NOTE BELOW) �1 /O PLT FORMSUAPUSING 36' STATION 2, CONCRETE D51 > ELEV•3T1.25' n 32'x M•OPENING GRAS RECOMMENDED BY PUMP MANUFACTURER a;UNDIETURB 12-MIN DEPTH OFCRUSHED STONE COPOLYMER MANHOLESTEPS \ Q &1Y O. C. (rvPJ ED EARTH PMIPSSHALLBESUBMERGED. PUMPOFFLEVELSHALLBESETTO MAINTAINAMINNUMCF2-OVERTHETOPOFTHE PUMPS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF FLOAT ELEVATIONS ARE PUMPS i 1 ALTERED FROM THOSE SHOWN. O I PUMPSTATIONSIDE VIEW I NTS PROVIDE CAST -I REINFORCED TE 5 �' CONCREPUMP STATION FLEXIBLE OASKE ALL PIPES 2. OR PROVIDE CAST4NPLACE FLEXIBLE GASKET FOR ALL PIPES 2' OR LARGER / A VALVEPIT I Q I IA / 4- CHECK VALVE(TYP.) \\ 4- BALL VALVE(TYPJ ` I.D. REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE s 4'CL 51 DI PIPE) `4-SDR 26 PVC FORCE MAIN PUMP STATIONPLAN VIEW NTS ALARM LIGHT (2) PRESSURE-TREATEDOEM(40 CCA) VNOO 6'x D POSTS ULRATEDNEMAAX DUPLEX POWER METER CONTROL PANEL. SIZE TO HOUSE ALL PUMP CONTROLS AND VFD'S. 8' SDR TO PUMP 5 DISCONNECTS-- MOIRHTALL PANELS ON PRESSURE TREATED 1. OCA) 1{'v 6' WOOD PLANKS CONDUIT SEAL 3' ALL ABOVE GROUND COMMIT MIN. NEMA 4X SHALL BE SON BB PVC. INSTALL JUNCTION BOX ENCASE POSTS IN EXPANSION JOINTS ON RISERS CONCRETE yj TO PUMP STATION 2'SON 40 WC 8 36' BURIED CONDUIT TO POKER SUPPLY - CONTROL PANEL SIDE VIEW POKER METER DISCONNECT SNITCH TELEMETRY ENCLOSURE �� ® _� PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL CONTROL PANEL TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW EDWRGEIVCYSTORAGE TANK NTS 5008 PSI REINFORCED CONCRETE 21 MIN 5-MIN I IiLACE T FOR ARGER I I I I I 1 i I I I I I I \ \ I I U 1 1 SLOPE •2% / % � I IS�\\\ PVC 'ATION 30'DIACCESS OPENING \ \ / I ` CONCRETEIRISER AN 4'VENTPIPE 13' CONCRETE RISER AND OPENING I FLATTOP O 1 I I I I SLOPE=2% I I I I I 1 13 PLANV�W fiMbRGENCYSTORAGE TANK NTS t c-o IVED JUN 17 2016 City of So. Burlington THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: / OF SHEETS E::) SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY O FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON pro} no. ; ��°� L&D dEsign ABR DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS SEWER PUMP STATION tl�Rn checketl we tlQle 06-06-16 LAMOOREUgi & ", Inc. SON Consulting Engineers, Inc. JIM, 14Mors Esx lu.nctifi- se cq VT05452 Tel: 802-878.4450 SCOIB /\S NOTED no. 13 �/ ��.� t a •�� �".' ♦� SIN►, , �• 1. "'.�,}�\ 9OC11 BORROW -I � FLOW UNE SECTION VIEW (AT PIPE) STORM OUTFALL DETAIL NTS OF THE DITCH. PROVIDE 4' OF TOPSOIL AND ESTABUSH DENSE GRASS (CONSERVATION MIX) ORIGINAL SLOPE VARIES -I1 1B" MIN. I� ROCK BORROW PER VAOT VA07 SPEC. 703.05 OR TYPE II ADD 4" GRUBBING J. STONE PER VA07 705.04 (MIN. 24" DEEP, SEE PLAN) MATERIAL AND GRASS �MIRMI 5QUX FABRIC COVER ON SPILLWAY / OR EQUAL UNDER AND J/ UNDISTURBED GRIND 2' TO SIDES O STONE. SLOPE TRENCH TO GRAIN NTH A MIN. SLOPE OF 0.005 FT./FT. TYPICAL STONE DITCH / SPILLWAY DETAIL TUTS TEYPORMY 6- YIN r THICKNESS _---- - / SEGMENT POOL 1 3 3" MIN. 1' MIN 1 F- 1 r� R� 3/8" LYEAN CRUSHED STONE ON CI STORM STRUCTURE CFrTI(NAI A -A STORM SEWER STRUCUTURE - WRAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (MIRAFI 14M OR EQUAL) AROUND GRATE. INSPECT FABRIC AFTER EVERY STORM AND CLEAN OR REPLACE AS NECESSARY STONE FILTER - SEE SECTION MEW FOR STONE REQUIREMENTS PLAN VIEW 1. INLET PROTECTION TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL CATCHBASINS OR YARD INLETS 2. THE STONE FILTER SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLOWNG EACH STORM. ACLU ULATED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE STONE REPLACED AS NECESSARY. 3, THE LIMITS OF THE STONE MOUND THE INLET MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE ENGINEER DEPENDING ON THE TOPOGRAPHY DIRECTING RUNOFF TO THE CATCHBASIN. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION NIS Fw MI. OR • , R0- .OWA1� 7�' TR 1 OI HINT IRIOMT-K-W PLAN NO E9 1. M dTRANCE WIALL E MANIAHEEO N A COSIBOII NKCN BILL PREYDIT TRADOIG OF SE-1 ONTO PUBLIC NOTES-B, -MAT. 1N45 YAI MANE RFPAR AK TACKED. T 6 NfO MA9XEB HOED 10 MM Ed -OF NO EBE RENKI IApCNEON SIP BY WASH-D1aClOMPOMIC RIpT4-O-Tui 2. TIE 115E O CALCMM CHLOREK OR W R MAY IE NECESSARY TO Cd1ROL OUST ARNG THE SUMMER. S. PRONE MPROPWATE 7-TIN ETWEM STABLQED COSTMICIKN ENTRANCE AND PUBLIC NONT-OT-OU, STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT MIS FOR MILKED SLOPES USE DOZER TREADS PRIOR TO SEEDING A MULClN TD CREATE GROOVES PERPENDICULAR SLOPE DIRECTION TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF VELOOTES SLOPE GRADING NIS SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: TOPSOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND INSTALL MATTING, OR HYDROSEED WITH APPROVED BINDER AFTER SURFACE ROUGHENING 1. EROSION MATTING WILL BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER TWIN 3HAV OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TURF ESTABLISHMENT SPECIFICATIONS ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT 00 NOT HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, ROOFS) OR ARE NOT LANDSCAPED WITH BARK MULCH, SHALL BE STABILIZED NEW GRASS COVER. AL l SEEDING AND MULCHING FOR ESTABLISHING NEW CRASS COVER SHALL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, AND THE APPLICATION OF SEED, FERTILIZER, LIME (WHERE APPLICABLE), AND MULCH SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE FOLLOWING: 1. A MINIMUM OF 4. OF APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS. PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE GROUND OR TOPSOIL IS FROZEN, EXCESSIVELY WET, OR OTHERWISE IN A CONDITION DETRIMENTAL TO ME WORK. FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, ME SURFACE SMALL BE RAKED. ALL STONES, LUMPS, ROOTS, OR OTHER OBJECTKONNAL MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. 2. URBAN SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY IN ALL AREAS AT THE SPECIFIED RATE. 3. FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AFTER PERFORMING A SOIL TEST AND BE APPLIED BASED UPON SOIL DEFICIENCIES LIME SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED AS NEEDED BASED UPON A SOIL PH TEST, 4. MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE SEEDING OPERATION BY NOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS MULON SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER THE AREA AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT THE APPLICATION OF A TACKFTER TO HOLD THE MULCH IN PLACE. IF NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE MULCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN APPROVED TAC(IFIER WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO ME OWNER. 5 ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. ALL DITCH CENTERLINE GRADES GREATER THAN 5% OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER ME SEED, EROSION MATTING SHALL CONSIST O EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NTH 100% AGRICULTURAL STRAW MATRIX ST17CH BOUNDED NTH DEGRADABLE THREAD BETWEEN TWO PHOTODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE MEETINGS, NORTH AMERICAN S150 OR EQUAL. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FULL GROWTH O GRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. VEGETATION GROWTH SHALL BE PERMANENT AND SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF PRECIPITATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING AND CARING FOR SEEDED, MULCHED, AND AREAS OF ESTABLISHED VEGETATION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. 2. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING. INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. SOIL SURFACE SMALL BE GRADED SMOOTH WITHOUT ROOTS, STONES OR OTHER PROTUSIONS THAT WILL PREVENT THE MATTING FROM BEING APPLIED IN FULL CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE. 3. BEGIN AT THE TOP O THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING ME MATTING IN A 6" DEEP X 6• WIDE TRENCH NTH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF MATTING EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE MATTING WTN A ROW O STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF MATTING BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL WIN A ROW O STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" PART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATTING. 4. ROLL THE MATTING (A) DON, OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. INSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE SIDE OF THE MATTING IS AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL MATTING MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN ARPROPRATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE MANUFACTURER'S STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND APPLICATION. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE MATTING. 5. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL MATTING MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY B" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON MATTING TYPE. 6. CONSECUTIVE MATTING SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE - WITH THE LIPPEfl MATTING PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE LOWER MATTING) WITHAN APPROXIMATE 12" OVERLAP, 57APLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA. APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS ENTIRE MATTING WIDTH. EROSION MATTING INSTALLATION DETAIL NTS URBAN MIX GRASS SEED S BY NEIGIT LESS U SEED PER ACRE TYPE OF SEED 31.5 45 CREEPING RED FESCUE 37.25 37.5 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 31.25 37.5 WINTER HARDY, PERENNIAL RYE 100 120 / LIVE SEED PER ACRE URBAN SEED MIX SHALL BE USED ALONG THE NEW STREETS AND ALL LAWN AREAS D STAKE O.C.) STANDARD EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, THESE ELEMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE SITE SPECIFIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS EROSION PREVENTION 1, THROUGHOL)T CONSTRUCT-, THE AREA OF S L DISTURBANCE SWILL BE UNITED TO THOSE AREAS) TWIT CAN K ACTIVELY MOPo(ED AND MANAO£D WITH THE FORCES AVAILABLE. AREAS THAT ARE NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED FOR A PERIOD OF 5 DAYS OR MORE, SMALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED, 2. THE MAXIMUM AREA OF SOIL DISTIARMCE AT ANY ONE TIME ON THE ENTIRE PROJECT PARCEL SHALL BE LESS THAN 5 ACRES 3, SEDIMENTSASINE.SEDIMENTTRAPS.PERIMETEROIKES.SEOIMENTMRRIERS.ANDOTHER MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SSHALL BE SHABE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN ANY LAN04XSTURBINIO ACTIVITY AND SHALL SE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLOPE LAND DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE. 4. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF SMALL NOT FLOW DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES UNLESS CONTAINED WITHIN AN ADEQUATE TEMPORARY -R PERWM W CHANNEL, FLWE.OR SLOPE DRAIN STRUCTURE. 5. WHENEVER WATER SEEPS FROM SLOPE FACE, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR OTHER PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED. BEFORE NEYAY CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS OR PIPES ARE MADE OPERATIONAL, ADEQUATE OUTLET PROTECTION AND ANY REWIRED TEMPORARY aR PERMANENT CHANNEL LINING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN BOTH THE CONVEYANCE CHARNEL AND THE RECEIMNG CHANNEL. 7, UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SMALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE VAIN THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS IN ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIA A. NOMORETHAN5 UNDARFEETOFTRENCHMAYBEOPENEDATONETIME. B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SWILL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES. 8, ALL SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS A PART OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN AN AREA THAT IS: A. LESS THAN 5%IN SLOPE. S. AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM ANY DOWMSLOPE WATER BODY OR CONVEYANCE TO A WATER BODY (INCLUDING STORM DRAIN INLET OR OMNI. C. VEGETATED. PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF SEDMENT SMALL BE IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED FOLLOWING DISPOSAL. 9, FOR ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER BY VEGETATIVE CCVER. SEEDING MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 15. 10. AWAREATOBESTABIUZEDFC MWI RTIMTDOESNOTHMVEESTABUSHEDVE TATON BY OCTOSER 15 MUST BE STABILIZED BY ANCHOREDMULCH AT THE WINTER MPoJCATIOLN DATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE, OR OTHER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (E.G. ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT). DORMANT SEEDING X.G NTH WINTER RYE) IS RECOMMENDED, 11. DISTURBED AREAS BORDERING AND DRAINING TO ROADS MOST HAVE AN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT BARRIER SPANNING THE EWE OF THE DISTURBANCE M PREVENTWASHING OF SEDIMENT ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO ROAD DITCHES . 12. NAY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ATA MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. HAY MULCH APPLICATION WRING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE AT A RATE Of TONS PER ACRE. WHERE SUBJECT TO BLOWING, MULCH SHALL SECURED IN PLACE BY TRACKING WITH EWOMENT (WITH TRACK RUNNING PARALLEL TO SLOPE), A TACKIFIER, NETTING, OR REPLACED WITH PROPERLY ANCHORED EROSION MATTING. 13. PLACEMEMOFSEEDANDMULCHSWLLLOCCURWITHN4B URSCFPLACEMEWOF TOPSOIL ANDCOMPLETIONOFINALTIRADW(NOTWITSTAN STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ELSEWHERE IN THIS PLAM, 14. DAYS FINAL SION STABILIZATION OENTCONTHE TEMPSURES MEALLKREME NO OWE 3U DAYS AFTERS OTHERWISE SITE EAUTMORIZE OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LOWER NEEDED. UNLESS OTERWISE A11T10PoZE0. STABILIZATION 15. AUAREA DSTURBANMMUSTHAVEMMPOMRYORPERMANENTSTABILIZATON WITHIN 14 DAYS. AFTER THIS TIME. ANY DISTURBANCE IN ME AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT ME END OF EACH WORK DAY. THE FOLLOMNG EXCEPTIONS APPLY: A. STABILIZATION IS NOT REWIRED IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS AND THERE IS NO PRECIPITATION FORECAST FORTE NEXT 24 HOURS. B. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIREDIF THE WORK IS OCCURRING INA SELFLCMTAINED EXCAVATION Q.E. NO CUTLET) NTH A DEPTH OF 2 FEET OR GREATER A 0, HMSE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY TRENCHES). 15. MAINTENANCEMUSTBEPERFORMEDASNEMSSARYTOEMMECONTINUEDSTABILIZATON. EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW, ALL SITES SMALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATERALS, SUCH AS MULCH OR ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS KEN SUSPENDED OR SECTIONS COMPLETED, A. ON THE CUT SIDE OF ROADS, EXTCHES SMALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH ROCK RIP~ ON CIHER NDNERCUIBLE LINERS IE O. RECP), OR MERE APPROPRIATE, VEGETATIVE MEWS VIES SUN AS SOD. B. FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUCH AS BORROW OR STOCKRLE MFAS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS YNTHIN SO FT. OF A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION. A DCMSLOM PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING, FOR EXAMPLE, OF SILT FENCING, SMALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED TO CONTAIN SCIL. EXPOSED DISTURBED AREAS ADJACE W TOA CONVEYANCE THAT PROVIDES RAPID OWSIM DISCHARGE O SEDIME W. SUCH AS A CUT SLOPE AT AN ENTRANCE, SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC OR GEOTEXTILE TO PREVENT $OIL LOSS UNTIL IT CAN BE STABILIZED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL K MAINTAINED TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING MATERIAL OF SITE, C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL CONTRIBUTING DRARAGE AREAS. SIMILARLY, STABILIZATION SMALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CONVERTING SEDIMENT TRAPSI9ASINS INTO PERMANENT (POSTLOIJSTRUCTIOM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, D. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DVERSIONIS IMMEDIATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. E. ALL SLOPES STEE PE R THAN 3:1INV), ON XI 3%, AS WELL AS PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS, AND EMBANKMENTS SMALL, UPON CO.IPIETIONS, K IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH SW. SEED AND ANCHORED STRAW MULCH, OR OTHER APPROVED STMILDATIOH MEASURES (RECP). AREAS OUTSIDE O THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM SNAIL NOT BE DISTURBED. SEE NOTE 1 FOR REINFORCING WHERE SILT FENCE IS LOCATED WHIN 100 FEET O A WEILAND. STREAM, OR RECEIVING WATER 4-FT HIGH MIRAFH IOOX r FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL MN. INSPECTION S MONITORING 1B THE ONSITE COORDINATOR SHALL INSPECT, AND DOCUMENT IN WRITING, THE STATUSOF CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT SITE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES AND MEASURES IN PLACE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN(7) CALENDAR DAYS. PRIOR TO PREDICTED PRECIRTATION, AND AS SCON AS POSS ISLE, BUT NO LATER THAN N HOURS AFTER ANY STOLI EVENT WHICH GENERATES A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 19, DMINGTUEWWERCONSTRUCTIONPERDD(OCT.15-APPoL15)MILYIWSECTONSSIYLLL BE FERFORMEDANDOOCUMENTED. M. INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY M REDUCED TO NDT LESS THAN ONE PER SUSPENDED. INPSECTIONS SHALL RESUME PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REOUREMENTS USTEDABOVE, 21. IN ADVANCE O A PREDICTED RMNFALL dR SNONAHELT EVENT, ALL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPROPRIATE TO CURRENT AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST BE CHECKEDAND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PROPER CERATING CONDITION. IF NECESSARY M PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE MCM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE TO WATERS OF THE STATE. THIS WILL INCLUDE THE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED SOILS ON THE SITE IN ADVANCE OF THE ANTICIPATED RUNCFF PERIOD. PERMIT NOTICE 22. A COPY OF THE DISCHARGE PERMIT. THE AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE, A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT, AND THE LOCATION MERE THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTRCL PLAN IS AVAILABLE SMALL BE POSTEDAT A LOCATION ON THE PROJECT SITE THAT IS VISIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING SEE NOTES ON SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING, SURFACE ROUGHENING GUIDELINES 1. SURFACE ROUGHENING SMALL BE USED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, THEREBY REDUCING THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING FOR TRAPPING OF SEDIMENT. SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED: -ON ALL SLOPES WHERE CONSTRULTIOU ACIVITIES WILL BE SUSPENDED AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. -PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH ON ALL - SLOPES 3H'.1V OR STEEPER. 2. SURFACE ROUGHENING MAY BE ACCOMIPUSHED BY TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT, OR GROWING WIN DISKS.TILLERS. SPRING NARROWS. OR THE TEETH OF A FRCNT. MLOADER BUCKET, WERE GROQ'INGISUSED. THEYSHDULDKLESSTAN3INDIESMEPANDNOMORETANISINCIES APART. 3, THE SURFACE ROUCNENNG MUST ALWAYS BE DONE SUCH THAT THE HORIZONTAL GROOVES RUN. ACROSS THE SLOPE AND ACT TO SLOW RUNOFF. 4. MEN USING EROSION MATING, AVOID EXCESSIVE SURFACE ROUGHEMNG. MATTING MUST BE INSTALLED IN INTIMATE CONTACT WIN THE SOIL SURFACE TO BE EFFECTIVE, 5. NEVER BACK BLADE ON SCRAPE THE FINAL SOL SURFACE. THIS WILL RESULT IN A SMOOTH SURFACE, INCREASING RUNOFF VELOCITY. SPECIAL WINTER EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INVOLVING EARTH DISTURBANCE CONTINUE PAST COTOBER 15, OR BEGIN BEFORE APRIL 15. THEN THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SMALL K IMPLEMENTED: STABILIZED ACCESSPOWSSHALLSEENLARGEDTOPROVIDEFORSNOWSTO RUWWILE STILL MAINTAIMNG EFFECTIVE SEDMENTCONTROL. PAMED S-WAND ICE MAY NEEDIOSE REMOVED AND ADDITCNW STONE PLACED TOIMIWNN TE LOOSE STONE SMiFACE AT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS. 2. THE UNIMOF DISTURBANCE MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED ON DAWN IN TO REFLECT THE BOUNDARY O WNTER WORK. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SMALLBE DRAWN INTO EXCLUDE ALL AREAS TEMPORARILY STABILIZED FOR THE WINTER. AND AREAS MERE DISTURBANCE WRING THE WINTER 16 HOT PLANNED. 3. BASED UPON THE WINTER ACTIVITIES PROPOSED, THE CNBITE PLAN COORDINATOR SMALL DEVELOP A SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT SMALL INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM A. ADEQUATE SIZE FOR SHOW STCR GE AREAS B. SNOW STORAGE AREAS LOOTED DOWN GRADIENT OF AREAS OF PLANNED DISTURBANCE C. CONTROL OF SHOAMELT RUNOFF D. PROHIBITING STORAGE OF SNOW IN STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURES, E. AMINIMLM 26 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN PERIMETER CONTROLS(SUCH AS SILT PENCE) TOALLOW FOR SNOW CLEARING AND MAINTENANCE. IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE WITHIN IM FT OF A RECEIVING WATER, SILT FENCE SMALL BE REINFORCED OR REPLACED WITH PERIMETER DIKES, SWPES. OR OTHER PRACTICES RESISTANT TO THE FORCES O SHOW LIDS. 5. THE CNE ITE PLAN COORDINATOR INSPECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE MANIENAHCE O DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO INSURE THAT THEY ME OPEN AND FREE O SNOW AND ICE DAMS. 6. SILT FENCE AND OTHER PRACTICES REWIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE SMALL K INSTALLEDA)EM O GROUND FREEZING. IF PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED OR MAINTAIW DAFMR GRIND FREEZING, NO FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL BE USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION O BERMS OR DIKES, ON INSTALLATION O SILT FENCE. 7, WHERE MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, IT SHALL BE APPLIED TRICE THE STANDARD RATE, OR A MINIMUM O 4 TONS PER ACRE. 8, WHEN MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. AS NEEDED, IT SMALL BE MOORED TO PREVENT BLOWNG AND REMOVAL BY WIND. ANCHORING MAY INCLUDE TRACKING WIN EQUIPMENT, APPLICATION O A TACKIFIER, OR NETTING, 9, TO ENSURE OCVER O DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE O A MELT EVENT. AREAS O DISTURKD SOIL MUST K STABILIZED AT THE END O EACH MY. WIN THE FOLLO ANG EXCEPTONS: A. IF NO PRECIPITATIONWITHIN N HOURS IS FORECAST AND WORK WLL RESUME IN THE SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN N MOLARS. MILY STABILIZATION IS NDT NECESSARY. B. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF, SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES. 10. SNOW ANDIOR ICE SMALL BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS O LESS THAN 1-ONEINCH PRIM TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 11. WHERE EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ON BUILDINGS WILL CONTINUE, OR WHERE VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED IS EXPECTED, A STABILIZED WORK AREA AROUND THE PERIMETER O THE STRUCTURE SMALL BE STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR ORAVEL. 116" STAKES TO BE DRIVEN MN. IT III � INTO GROUND FILTER FABRIC AY HARDWOOD STALE FABRIC TO BE KEYED 6' INTO JOINING TWO ROLLS OF SILT PENCE GROUND TOP MEW OF JOINT tlOffS 1) SILT FENCE ,STALLED WARN 16- FEET A W4TLANSTEAK, ON RECEIVING WATER SHALL BE REINFORCED WIN WOVEN NRE FENCE (MIN. 14 GAUGE CORE WIN 6- MAX.M MESH SPACINGS) 2) USE ONLY MANUAL METHODS O INSTALLATION AM CLEANING WARN WETLMD AND BUFFER ZONE. 3) PRIOR TO BE NNING OF CONSTRUCTION OR EARIHMONNG, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A CONTINUOUS SILT FENCE AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. 4� FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO KEY INTHE BOTTOM OF THE SET FENCE. IF NECESSARY, GRANULAR BORROW SHALL B USED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO KEY IN THE SILT FENCE RATHER MAN FROZEN NATIVE MATERIAL. �] 5) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AND AT OTHER LOCATIONS AS 2016 NEEDED. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE NTS NEW OUTLET -T �^B•^•^'w� STRUCTURE 390 390 FlN GRADE 388 388 °H7L AV 388 J eH _ 3S8 OUTLET POOL EXISTING GROUND 384 — �_ .— — — — — — — — — — — — — — 384 FOREBAV 380 — — ___ ___ — — — — — 382 38 - - - - - 380 378 DATUM EMV —-- 0 50 100 150 200 POND EAST SECTION 1" = 10HOR. 1'= 5'VERT. NEW OUTLET STRUCTURE l 250 390 388 "' 388 EXISTING GROUND OUTLET PIPE 388 _ .� — - 388 Oy,7� FINISH GRADE ROCK BORROW ._ — 384 — — — — _ _ — _ _ — 384 ROCK BORROW 382 77 382 380 378 I - - 378 - - DATUM AZZV ------ U 50 2C X 2P HEAW DUTY CAST IRON FRAME AND ORATE STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR AAS—H-N LOADING WITH PRECAST OPENINGS TYWCAL WEIROPENING SEE PLAN FOR SRE 4 71�EN— —ELEVATION REBAR WATERTIGHT RUBBER BOOT ET;(:,ASTM478FRECASTREINFORCEDCgiCRETE SEE PLAN FOR OUTLET PIPE TYPE 4 ELEVATION OUTLET ORIFICE PRECAST OR DRILLED IN CONCRETE OUTLET PIPE —� (FADNO CENTER OF PU)—� sEE PLANS FOR NUMBER. SQE.—ELEVATONOF �- SEE DETAIL SLEET FOR _ ANTIBEEP COLAR REOUIREMENTs COLLAR f EXTEND BEDDING TO LIMITS OF EXCAVATION WCRUSHEDSTONEBEDDING UNDISTURBEDGROUND REMWEALL MUCK, ORGANICS OR UNSUITABLE SOIL AND FILL W TH GRANULAR BORROW POND OUTLET STRUCTURE NTS 100 150 200 250 POND WEST SECTION 1"=10'HOR. 1" = 5' VERT. FACH ANTIBEEP C—R SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF2 FEET ALONG THE LENGTH OF THEPFE ABLE FILL OR APPRWED CLAY TURBEDNATNESOLE V A A MINIMUM OF THREE ANTIBEEP COLLARS SHALL BE WSTAU EDON GALV. METAL TOP PLATE A THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE STORLIWATER BASW. 2. THE COLLAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WRH FLOWABLE FILL I— PSI p.A. OR APPR WED CLAY, 3 NORPAYMENT PAYMENTNT FOR THE ANTI -SEEP COLURS SHALL BETI CONSIDERED SUBSIDIARY TO THE STORMWATER PIPE WSTALUATpN. IS' ABOVE TOP OF UPPE OPoFICE ANTI -SEEP COLLAR i N. I CORED IN STRUGTUtE- OW OPoFICE1I2 ROUND 12' DA, J ERTCGMP HOOD PROMDE5.1' DIA. HOLES EVENLYSPACEDARGUED"OCWELD1'X1'X3 A rANGLETOCREATE FLANGE PROVIDE 4 GALV. BOLTS ON EACH FETOATTACHTOSTRUCTURE BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE ORIFICE Rq C E I V E D NTS J UN 17 2016 City of So. Burlington - LEGEND PROJECT PROPERTY LINE F B ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED OPE DI LINE R DR]OX—IM TO E DISSOLVED �- ---1 —_— SIDELINE E M E BARBED NAR1RE FENCE SITE �o STONE WALL IPF IRON PIPE FOUND ILAISHAMESTAM 21.53 IRF IRONRODFOUND LOCATION MAP THOMAS -LIFE LWISE KLEH LIFE ESTATE 1S IPF'' �' ]� LWRLBROTOR TSF TS?AKE FOUND N.T.S W 1.r Ac NO6•l7w- I c", �-wF MKMUEL Il MARY VOL. 1254, PO.2]D - r-'�- Tsp �_ III FG, 1M CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET P. BREIT GRABOWSD SCOLINS gp/'L64�E w'5 �" Gi1'[�e IPS IRON PIPE SET 6 JENNIFER MEOT NF 1'PF ��� - I / kP SUI]LINGIgp A SURVEY PgM(NOI.NRKER) ]LF VOL. IS PG .59 DB AG VOL 813, PG. 29] Jt]11S - . PD Nmro1RrN / DRAT; NIF 1'IRF I 1 _ NOW OR FORMERLY 2' IPF N1 20B.SS AG ABOVE GRADE XpT-14N / JOHN LAN ERAS KIN SO BELOW GRADE NIF VOL 1010. PD. 77 NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AM RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLdMNG PLANS: A.`LAFD50FROBERTAMMA pRIE SKIFF, SWIFT STREET. SOUTH I BURL IMT TOSN, VERMONT, S LOT SUBDIVISION UBDIVISION PLAT - DATED-1, FIN BYLAMDLREUAgCKNSORCONSULTING VALE ENGINEERSINC ASRECORDEOINS IOE0HECI YOFSd H 2 ` BURFTE T TES.SOECORDS. G$ 1 B.'BYYTFTES ENGINS RIM, M AS RECORDED PAGE 18,1 M, iii BY WILLIS ENGINE ASM RECORDS, IN VOL. BD, PApE 1B40R THE SW TH BURLINGTON IAND RECORDS. I / C. INC,LAT OF BOUNWRY ADJUSTMENT - OF SPEARMEADOWS, ��qF` N IR 5 T TARRANT, D 6 C KTEDJ N ARY SPEAR STREET. SOUTH BUG NEE RIN. VESOCIATDATED AS 25, 2DIL UI CIVIL SS BRYJN RODFOUND PINNACLE AT SPEAR ENGINEEPoND ASSOLMTES, INC., AS RELOADED IN SURE 5500E m B.BS STf969TE OF� IRF TSF OPEN SPACE THE CITY OF SOUTH BUPoJNGTON LAND RECORDS 18f. VOl. , PG. ]BL ➢ IRON PPE TO BE SET D.T AG _ me.µ, GB' AO 1 WF IP9 N0B•2r4B'N I D.'PLATOFSURVEY,LANDSOFFARRELL6COLE,-, 1-1 1- SPEAR STREET, SOUTH SURLINGTON. VERMONi', DATED NWEMBER2Y,2W5,11- ENGINEERINGASSOdATES,INC,AS RECORDED IN SLIDE SWOF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOJ LAND a / RECOR0.5. 0 1 q E. 'FINAL PLAT FOR SLBdVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT O ILWACRES bl AND JOHN LARK IN, PINNACLE ® SPEAR(FORMERLY NOWLAND TVLO) PROPOSED LOT SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURDNGTON, VERMONT' DATED 621i8. DILBEM 1. NLLMMER, IF EN I LAST REVISED-.BYVAUOINC.BLITON,LS.,ASRECORDEDIN SUDE B35 2 OF THE CITY OF SOUIH BURUNGTDN LANDRECORDS. I NR VW.20B, aR. 226 2 THE BEY SETHIS SURVEY MAE GENERATED RGRADE OPS OBRVATIONS RECORDED N APR SURVEY L,, AHIL AND ARE SASED ON THE VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATE �....... I SYSTEM, NADBD(CORS 11931. �q STIR EE T A 1 ] THE FIELDWORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL, 201B. z)� I � 5. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS ANDIOR I5'2 1'IPF I RIGH -WAY. a/ e. NOR UIMENTATION FOIFD IS AS NOTEDON THIS PLAN __ FL BS14' _ SHED. I I - 58Bro1'321V O1'AS 18� \h / (NRAOE FOMADILL-A 100.LY 1 ]. THE WIDTH OF BASEOONADESCRRPTCNPOUNDON ROM (W RGE22OFTHESPEAR TEET I OMRCF s BURUNGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS, 15M-1MV5. KAINE@I SAM/IF11ET1.1'AO I _ _ S14•i5221V . mmm I I VOL 61;in BB B. SEESHEETPL-2FORTHEMETESANDBOUNDSOFTHEPROPOSED - 81' ,11 INTERIORPROPERTY LINES, FOOTPRINT LOTS. AND PROPOSED ( I 81' EASEMENTS. 1 J I� /]I/ / /"� /. / / , I o- KENNEFNNILLER,11 SBBro1�'��w 1 / l I�l (I yy Va G 4a CITY CLERK'S OFFICE / / / / // I I I ffi ' I� SZE•5Sy,�CRY OF SOUTH x66EK•Ta]L VT. I ' o'•�pI�T REDEIWnraRREaDRO �_M.an \ g��`RVL� ] �WrFJ l ' i/ ffiI 1I11 MARGARETA RFLORO®MBLDE6 +aBr 1 1 / // I I 11 I I I DENCIffR µP ATTEST. CIIYQERK va.1a1•, va Ba SRP MB D. -Ptim MARK 6 SHEI �) \ �� _"`•F SB' / I I I� /- J ' REVISIONS PHILLIPPE Sp c TSF PROJECT NO NIF I R�l 0.V AG 14008 VW. 50, PG. 350 I \`` T Me.[� I'1 r n F'1 . A r- n r1 �, A ]n I . 1 BURVEY ROBERT 6 TAMMY AVONDA NIF IAVIGNE YOL 1045, PD. 221 NI GMDNETTI I NF I GRAPHIC SCALE Im Im OIL — (IN FM) 1 UiCh - 100 K F.L--�—APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT \ REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VE RMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF ,2016 QUITE. FR- SUBJECTTOTHE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS YY YY �I VV CC RR OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 2016 BY SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1B50SPEARSTREET SOUTH BUPo.IN."04. W. VOL .F PCB. 656856 TOTAL. PARCEL AREA • 2BD3 ACRES (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT I9 BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PEMINENT DEEDS ANDOR OTHER OFFICMl RECORDS. AFD MARKERS EVIDENT REWINEMENTSOF2]VSA 1403. GATED TH6 _DAY OF � 2016 L.S ~ [-:7ilhT� A U N 17 2016 City of So. Burlington L 14.OW/ MARK B SHEILA PROPOAVBEkSE.ENTEOWNER9 HOMEOWNERS PKILUPPE NIP ASSOCIATION I VOL5%mLMROBERT B TAMMY M16 N KIF VOL 1015. PTi. 221 LOCATION MAP N.T.S PROPOSED 30 FEET WIDE WATERLINE EASEMEM TO THE CNY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON / PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE J/ WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE CRY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON Y7 CRTO PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CRY OF SOVfIi SURUNWCENTER TON. THE TOTE CENTERED ON THE PAVED PATH AS M. B M. SCOLLINS P. BRETT GRABOWSKI &JENNIFERLMILOT I VOL. 11fi,PD. 529 NIP VOL 643, PG.2aT � t444w 2B6.8T •� _ _ 2.09.v.e (� � I �0 F(D164.07 ....w 14BED e_ean iw R=4TO.ar 1g4`50113R 2lD.DD' ■11'R•T29AD'^ R•888.OD AGRICULTURAL L I ® I J COLLEGE PROPOSED 1 L- R VOL 134, PG. 364 STORMWATER POND r R=W1.OD L• 126.TT 51 3 IS- 2.f18 xae. SIDELYE OF PROPOSE CITY. D R • 1]O.ar� �® 1. ATER EASEMENTTO = ffY OF SOUTH BURl1NOTON {;yj R=411.. 1�T R= 23-3A�IpA'' _ \� 188 IPF IPF �0.52.y ® . O ar� ®_J KOENAWLLE RS I,PS PQ SS I ` R'—992-E4 N0B'3M1'ABw ram/ )1 ( LAVIGNE I \ CIMMONETTI NF MF GRAPHIC OdALE W W IN FEUr I huh - IDD R. PROPOSED IS THE CITY OF SOUTH C PA E D PA`FH EASEMENT TOTH PROPOSED EASEMENT TO EASEMENT TO BE PAVED PATHNGTON. SI TOTHEFP OF TURl1NTTON. EABEMEM TO BE ESOUTH ASEMBURLINGTON.ETWENEOFPROPOSED CENTERED ON 111E 81DEWALKAB EASEMENTTO BEBFTFT WEST OFh1E EDGE CONSTRUCTED. OFTIEPAVEDPATHASCONBTR,ICTED, -,HA, ESTATE NI VOL 21. 405. PG. 126 55 T.8 L KLEH NIP VOL 175, PO. 1B9 O©YP-11- Y 73 74 /© t-�-- 390.-BD. L 'ae.ar 116 © 16 R • 0D ieD.w y,g�• L•5286 L=101.TY L•112M 6'22'taw -- _ -11'41 E 30.38 t �- ,1gAE 51D ® P9 R•120.00' R`1BO.ar ® ® I 43 L 6 J L L L 3 © R=1BO.OD R • 160.00` L=9 B.BD MRa. IRE IPB�- N09°2848'W 288M' I W.8 M OILBERT 211D. PO.22b OWNER: SPEAR MEADOW'S, IN SOUTFI EUFUMST T SOUTH7'PGG "'S VT08109 VOL L T ION BSS85a APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF . 2016 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAIDRESOLUTION. SIGNEDTHIS_DAYOF 2016 BY (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PUTxINENRTINEMNINEORMATKN!ABSTRACTED FROM PEOEEDBANDIdt OTNER OFFICIAL RECOR08, AND MARKERS EVIDENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE REOUIREM Y1403 DATED T HI6 _ —DA DAY OF OF J 201 S L.S. M356 LEGEND PROJECT PROPERTY LINE ABUTHNO PROPERTY LINE SIOEI IRE OF EASEMENT BARBED Vr1RE FENCE STOKE WALL IPF IRON PIPE FOUND IRE IRON ROD FOUND IF TSTAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET 0 IPS IRONPIPE SET NIF NOW OR FORMERLY AD ABOVE GRADE BG BELOWGRADE © COMMON AREA LOT NLMBER ® FOOIPRINTLOTNLMBER NOTES: 1. SEE SHEETI(PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT) FOR SURVEY NOTES, THE PROJECT b—PY. AND LOT 52. AREAS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAT FOR THE COMMON AREA LOTS EXCLUDE THE AREAS WTHIN THE RESPECTIVE FOOTPRINT LOTS. 'r"% TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 1.12 A 31 i1 3.fia0.1 fi4.a 'nLo 4.D TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 22, 2T.29. 3; 0. 4fi AND 4T 2,TT0.1 SO OF— —1b aL —1s FOOTPRMTLOT. 3,800. T No 7-1 9u0.0 T'%CAL FOOTPRINT 2,M.f z,efiz.t TRI �. 12, � 9 OTS 24.. 5. WAND 3 LOTS Si.28.81 81 9,OeDeT �A m 81.0 aL 82.0' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT UOT823. 26, 28 38.42, YAND4a 3.113. T CITY CLERK'S OFFICE aTr of eolrrH xmLxDTDN, vr. RECEIVEOFOR.-RD_ ..I0 AT OCLOa(_M.AND RECORD®IN HLIDE JUN 17 2016 City of So. Burlington r ,('� KLEN , `v I —/.4d PAVED PATS /..\j ".. �,. T'-/� - > ✓--- -� / J/���,y' \ / / r tE6002t9 TYPICAL 3 UNIT O ATTSP —�/ _{� - \ _ _ OPENB/ -'-PRJNAGLE BPEARO �0 L I IER ' I CLASS2WE 1742 ANN 1 \i111-0f�029 .. 1742-000Y] v\ \ L\ \ TO REMAIN ! ( Ilk_ l 1/ /)-_t' L, I11t`_IMIULER MDEN oR- = \ LIPPE I .+v1X�a ///�\\\ �_..�.i '-��I-yJ . �. ICIi-__ •- _ �/ \l y f, !//,. d12951'` -_ L1j I ram..„-. ... /_�--.._ -^ ..,J/' -II I I� 'I�/�\ •- � ^,/ J__ -_,-� II TI_,-�� I A 131 I p - /.._ \ 1610-0t31T \ / � "_ ._- -_- '_. vtK j`� I J 1 I N � I I 1 .��/ �- - y/ - 1 ( 15064N'{1 (I /" ��. J I I ^I•• 7--- - III /--.\i-'\/� \` ^i( I GRAPHIC SCALE I C:(_CNIm PROJECTBOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER — v EDGE OF WETLAND TREELINE - - - - — EXISTING CONTOUR BUILDING SUMMARY 18 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS (3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES CLIC.D.T INIMI=v 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 1C CONSTRUCTION PHASING 1L STREET LIGHTING PLAN 1S SIGNS & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE 8, UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE & UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE & UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE 5 PROFILE- SPEAR MEADOW ROAD 6 PROFILE -VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE_ VALE DRIVE&STREETA 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 DETAILS & SPEC IFICATIONS-STREETS 11 DETAILS & SPEC IFICATIONS- SEWER &STORM 12 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - WATER 13 SEWER PUMP STATION 14 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - EPSC 15 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - STORM PONDS 16 SPEAR STREET TURN LANE PL1 PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION to*b 09 ty 64T LANDOWNER: GARY N. FARRELLB 1350 SPEAR, LUG & SPEAR MEADOWS, INL. 1350 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 0 W APPLICANT. THE SNYDER GROUP. INC. 4076 SHELBURNE ROAD. SUITE6 SHELBURNE. W0 82 N LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. 1� SOILS MAP KE SOIL MAPPING UNIT Cv COVINGTON SLLTYCLAV HSG 1 D 049 N.T.S. Ge & G B GEORGIA STONY LOAM C 0 24 LN LIVINGSTON CLAY D 0.49 M,,C MASSENA STONY SILT LOAM C 020 V.B VERGENNES CLAY D 008 ZONING DATA TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER -184 IM PROJECT PARCEL AREA -2593 ACRES ZONING DISTRICT - SOUTHEAST QUADRANT- NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL - NR OVERLAY DISTRICTS - WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER DENSITY: BASE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY - 31 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 1.2 UNITSIACRE • 31.1 UNITS AVERAGE ALLOWABLE DENSITY • 103 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 4 UNITSIACRE =103.T UNITS PROPOSED DENSITY = 43 UNITS NOTES: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT OF THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 1 I'_ L / v7 \J~ �\1�, \ t �•T �. ._1 ✓/�\_�v� \ /�' J I i10'PAVED PATH la\\—\<: \\!' � / / \/ —/ «� ._ �T--�—� / >.. r^"� .�r \-1 -'! �l 1 \ +-----i \ \ .' (_. ^.� ,- ✓ I \ \ a _ TYPIDPI3 UNIT •- TOWNHOUSE .' - SPACE 'PRdITA6i.E AT 3PEARO \ / FAMILY +MN l - - - _ '� t, �— 10'PAVEO'PATH '1„ CARRIAGE HOME POSED WATERMAIN COR�HNEC110N TO SWIFT SIRE a �I _ — /7 / f / CLASS 3,JJETLAND N t e o y e e � o l� eie et°� i■■�OPEN SPACE 1 I l777 1 / I fi � I \ S ../ •___.'_ "__. �. I'd 4-x a a x x' 7<'d `-�_ "� \hl PUBLIC OPEN SPACE `\ �.Lt ;/ L-4 A �v�"v, (FUTURE PARK) A\ (. I P�(srIBE �EMovED {Nc cARq�E \ ( 1 I l Tby j t e �. (7L—YTJ EXISTING Hous�D , Z / - - I • \ v �l K ✓ C / GARAGE TO BE HEMO D ✓ `'� `� ,.., 1 • t I EIOSTING HousE l i lyll% I TO REMAIN ( / /,C i r 1 _ J r"�I I ✓ - V / 4 I 4 RgTR —, -.. \ \ _ -- •- •. I / /' —1-' \ — _ Imo` / GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 00 100 200 400 tin reeq 11, = 10ok THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAV ABUTTING PROPERTY UNE ---------- WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v V EDGE OF WETLAND TREELINE -- --w-- - EXISTING CONTOUR Providence MicroCorel- Medium Housing PROV TYPE FEATURES • OLCOu9-R6d • D10v tAmmtrlg raspy • R,h.r,w UnI,,m%I$are. T• II IinNion • Irdagral N>ga SlYgmaslan • Type61111 IYvand wN • L!bSh�1^"N%m&araGRacn .mk4AI • 1-1—dpoade,... 1-net t • 000OK, 4000K SOOOK CCT SPECIFICATIONS - 8mm w ma.: lar-t a7amm k J 31S"i E04 mm W .yg 29!Ca EP 096 • DF+Ang'. SS 3I E'fanl mn f�LYY}}aa lly ). , ^' ^ Ci ORDERING INFORMATION MODEL 1 a fKLUV................. .........._._ 3 1L. 4 TTT--- 5 S I........................I ��1 LAIR Eng- OOT onw Om— W. Opt— ConTdB MounBrp 1. LIGHT ENGINE 5 OPTIONS > MOUNTING 11R4[3i.MLPmcbkn 44nm4 0'. SPK rlkarB'.uaal SNngaMcmfi0w.atlm as af.w.a4'DlAgrx: BPS fi%P lcAeaery 32L LDL ZONddad I.M_iAtm T522LED CLRfrbwhYAWA7 H56 DANMse.gch:4aV6d b•Ta4 n56 WMA.S WJ TL3LED TR:':LED PFN(f»tawemned.) WMAEO EPAL AEnuCsWnpwryl Pde..—LALm.1 WMA20 DCLGRTEMPEHATURE `® O]A-T fEaM+'a-Tlook W) TRASU-A SLAT . PT23 fN�AwA Fb'd`BRTeMn7 TRABU 4 ''w dwA9'W tM) TR466 SLAT-2 SL"I-d TRA66 6 SLASU 6 3. DRIVECJRFENT 6. CONTROL TRA55 aQA U-4 '� /F`�'R AwbCiH,,ANabNMRk4yCRyaPRWry1 TRA6'74 WQA -6 �:•:/(A- g.INdafAx PlR4vdWJdara9 TRA67-b 4 COLOR P' 3M ISanew Con rq lwamnl )11. I PM'2 PM3 WN A2k'Nhk VSU L4 A. acte08pYb a+Rbbla to (mwH nccWRlroY giRtlfB RL Raol C:FkT Cwbr T AGABPkB MAI. Ala'SAbaimm dwut I dox NTA•' wry dlbr TR a 6o CdTPlat 9PeC RInM pL)z,. Lw*fI+m MG AW.Gay N 0Ik Efen AGN NRquegnm and Mnry0f M l,yrk. aE:nE!!. „arMq T TT T-o, LO fiats^ww eae WLYI Akal8en. RAL NamaaR Cab? I MDB f .wa?c CU6TUM•*C.,bafaby ARanEu Au _a84A—G ... ... - a avN sway I cA laws a Pa76 era. IT 1m:a[e m7a 2.. lwawaNrw TYPE GrRpo-Y+O3lta pa2rB tJOT-S I Shakespeare ROUND TAPERED COMPOSITE LIGHT POLE ANCHOR BASE INSTALLATION AO -SERIES Post top pole SHAKESPEARE AO -SERIES ANCHOR BASE POLES Bonn- ORDERING INFORMATION M IMh.gn%to a5 tee Smooth. moor m nam,al finish 3 Iftsmiandl and 5 special amhrteckIml colors avadabla Hph pedomminae U'/ and waethar- Raman ppmenbd resin Syebm wdh an add tonal pigmented po l y —Man. coating. Tenon by or DrRI. and Capped Standa d 2An' IS handhok, located 18 move gads P.I. are Ind Hd0allr id.bfi.d with a permanent embossed tag lacaled V hom DR. 81—ndmdoely for alaamem I hNwsipht may to install, Saves money A O 3- 01 S 1 (*) T T T T 1 A � R SERIES �lNpTN Tmd NIBH E a" � � 61ABUC aCOLPR �� •a.ire"Aa Nrsxox aaar8 Lwxra E 00•CATEO a•PARI RRON7A e•BAVER xe •CONea1TfACTpn i=WNRE im aFTIONe • • CUBIOM E6x h` IN "r I T J / —/ \.�`-m- <!•./L (/ L^./\ � --\.....ram �/•^_•� ,,'.>��I .. `— E`\ r /L\I__ I � L� `` { ^.-., _� - - /,�!�! � � -. ` It , • _. I I I � � _. � i� VI / --- — � - ->, T— � , v r� ._ I I I �' �_/ ...... `^af // \�--•-�__—w��.r" ,-I'��-. I{,, — /�- ...__ � mil-., \1--l/b1'r'_=�1\ Ily OICAQ NSW -,TREFT LIGHT .....' , \ 1 l I / 08-0 17 REVISE PER FINALREVISIC THESE PLANS VMH LATEST y .--\\ \ ^ J \/ \ ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURI �7 I O SKETCH/CONCEP / 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL NOTES 1. THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY W ITH THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETLIGHT. LUMINAIRES, POLES. AND PHOTOSENSORS. 2. LIGHT POLE BASES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH VTRANS STANDARD DETAIL DRAWING T.133 (LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAILS) 3. THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION DESIGN IS TO BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS. 4. SEE OTHER SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL SITE AND UTILITY DESIGN INFORMATION. GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 400 (H teN) 1 Inch • IDD R. �9 LEGEND 6A SOLAR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (WITH SIGNS ® STOP SIGN (SEE INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION DETAIL) OC CHEVRON SIGN1-14. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OCORNER WARNING SIGN IWIA. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) PEDESTRIAN ZONE SIGN IWI I.I. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OPATH ENO. SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) © NO PARKING SIGN I.E. DETAIL THIS SHEET) NO PARKING (WITH ARROW) SIGN (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OPEDESTRIAN R-.IN. WII -I. WIS-1P. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) OWETLAND MI-ERPRETIVE SIGN ISEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) GRAPHIC SCALE _ I \ w am 0 i4� Cl LL BE TYPE I PAVEMENT EXISTING CULLDE-SAC To BY STRIPES 0 I'C' E""'"G SPACES \ \L1 STREE T �- \ ' ' _. I I .. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (FUTURE PARK) LOT so T /'J LOT 48 - t /'/ ) 4/_7 I L I7 /Ll Il, THE INTERPRETIVE SIGNS SHAI L BE INSTALLED AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE ON A PEDESTAL MOUNT BASE. THE SIGN POST AND ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL, THE SIGNPOST SHALL BE SET INA CONCRETE BASE HAVING A MINIMIM DIAMETER OF 10 INCHES AND EXTENDING TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET BELOW FINISH GRADE, THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE EXTERIOR GRADE SOLID PHENOLIC RESIN, WHICH IS RESISTANT TO ULTRAVIOLET (UV) RADIATION DETERIORATION AND GRAFFITI -PROOF. THE EMBEDDED GRAPHIC PANELS SHALL HAVE DIGITALLY PRINTED SUBSURFACE IMAGES FUSED INTO A SINGLE PANEL AND UNDER THE EFFECT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE. THE SIGN PANEL SHALL BE WEATHER TIGHT. THE SIGN PANEL GRAPHICS SHALL BE 24INCHES BY 381NCHES, WETLAND INTERPRETIVE SIGN NTS BASE MOUNTED FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK 30' m STOP SM-12GAUGE2SWPRESTEEL GROUND SIGN POST WITH ANCHOR DOUBLE 4- YELLOW CENTER LINE, TYPE I MARKINGS TO BE APPROVED BY Cltt STOP SIGN N.T.S. STOP SIGN, 2'4 OFF FACE S it OF CURB -CONCRETE CURB gam 1T WHITE STOP BAR TO BE LOCATED 15BACK FROM EDGE OF TRAVELLED WAY OR 4 FT BEHIND CROSS WAUI( INTERSECTION CONSTR UCTIONDETAIL NTS JI • PATH3�XBp is Xid- SEE PLAN FOR SIGN LOCATIONS ENDSW113 TYPICAL PATH ENDS SIGN TYPICAL PEDESTRIANZONE SIGN NTS NTS NO NO NO PARKING PARKING PARKING ANY ANY w,a2° W11 (LT&RT) TIME TIME ANY TIME INSTALL 2 SIGNS TOTAL NG1 - 1 SIGN FACING SOUTH 12'%18- - 1 SIGN FACING WEST TYPICAL PATH ENDS SIGN NTS TYPICAL CORNER SIGNS NT5 �SOLAR PANEL (ORIENT TO .OUTH)WITH INTEGRATED CONTROLLER AND RADIO TRANSMITTER/ANTENNA 80'X W FIG WI 1-2 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING © SIGNS (BB) /(/((//`/.1�1\\'1 BI-DIRECTIONAL RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS M 1B'X 3D'FYG WIB-TP J ARROW PLAGUES S-B) PEDESTAL SIGNAL POLE (I' DIA. STD. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE, PAINTED BLACK) PUSH BUTTON ASSEMBLY& J r X 12- Ri S-35 PEDESTRIAN SIGN H- REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING -� SEE VTMNSSTD. DETAIL FOOTING FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW THE RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON MANUFACTURER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER AND CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. >OLAR RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON DETAIL NTS GENERAL NOTES 1. NEW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON TOP COURSE PAVEMENT SHALL BE DURABLE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2D11 VT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2. TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON BASE PAVEMENT AWN' BE PAINT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON T SQUARE STEEL POSTS WITH ANCHORS, 4. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH MINIMUM T FEET CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN AND FINISH GRADE, ' SPLIT RAIL FTYPICAL ROCK BORROW WITH WIRE ME H THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY SEWER PUMPSTATION I 1 MIN. 12' TO POND INL *Y' L TRU TUBE 1 oun,Er POOL . _.. % J o I I ACCESS TO POND INLET / ,GRATE=365.00 pIGSAFE'PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION METERBCONTROL PANEL SE�SHEET4 I I � i BOTTOM = 3]300 I r--__•_ 1'X12.OPENING=381.00 $PELT LFENCE CONFIRM LOCATNNJ WITH CITY r --_ 2.S ORIFICE=3B2.85 NE \ WI WIRE MESH SEE SHEET I3 DE SEWER _REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL / ;` 3B1 , STORM OUIFALL 18' PE WITH E.S. VALVE PIT \ PUMP STATION DESIGN DETAILS 18"OUT=382.60 INV=381A0IDE GRAVEL I / I DRIVE ANDRE &MULCITH / 10' THICK CR-Eb GRAVEL) / TOPSOIL, SEED &MULCH / / � r 3B1 (18' THICK CRUSHED GRAVEL) EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK EXISTING HOUSE AND l GARAGE TO BE REMOVED " / �.3g i 9TO.AL WA7YPON l \ r, 8" SDR 36 / _384 _ - - - - _ To BE REMOVED. INVP 9B].,O E.g. SPIRW 65 ,,.' / 18'PE-+ s., 8'SOR 35 PVC 5, `SC'D1•. - FD�-- 1° 9� Bp10 CBN11 ro MH/ W EXISTING WATER SERVICE / BOTTOM POND-381.0 ¢ S } 1 \ FD COORDINATE WITH ,� \ y r3 ,:,.' ,8, WATER DEPARTMENT/�-\ � �� \ - - �- _ - / INV=36150 � ?y"„♦; �" •� �'_ 'b �� - - -I� � /�h CLA 2 WETLAND / 21-PEWITHE3. 'WIDE AEA = CB#28 STONE SPILLWAY ...... -. ••\ I 8"SDR 35 PVC / a I I \ f ] INV = 381.25 / "-'r' 381 I " FFE 301.5 )O �j w BFE 1630 Y / ,f i £1 2 h z STORMWATER POND I /1 �NOWATER=38.0 TTOM PND15PE 5 6PILLWAV=3B4.00 \ tlY TPO BOTTOM318.00 1sPEWITHE.S. ,.MAIITI C1 NIs I XIDE GATE $g\ \ I 46 ACES�°_"INV=3ez.oSIOO PE WITH ES. I INV. 383.Do 1.rour=38z.00l f4 I �] / 10- WIDE GRAVELACCES3 DRIVE '�`SOR3g PVC I / \ \ I I I '' /� �\ I I t« FFEG39 / 1 II 47 / (18' 111K;KCRUSHEDGRAVEL) ` \ / UD CL OUT A A \ ..._ - I1 / 382.0 FFE = 393.5 (�++ / 44 POD' y \ \ I / I _ _. _ -p II- • BO E M. 378.00 �1 \ , �I L I W 1 1 BFE /383.2 INV=385. / BFE=385.0 Sl t� 3 / I ,, .. 880 � � � � / \ CLASS 2 WETLAND / � I I NEW STREETLIGHT I 1 °'SO 42 le PE WWilo�b E.S.$ /8 )� / X i _ 21sz.n , 3 TANK 43 \ ENDDEFINED M1 i CB pt 15 P 's N CLEANOUT _ INV 3 9 .� ...._ •... -4. \ � BFE:381 - 1 � ' 2'4' PE WITiI =383.15 FID Ian _ CB p2 /- / a J J9Z 3 ,. / moo.^ 1 II \ I 11 pBMH I ,- - - 4F30R2fi PVf,FM N 'ry III I \ �e F NEW smrucHT H, �� 1 m I dm _ 10'PAv€o,12 �° \ `8 �• �40�� m e-SDR _i5P / Ici I + 388 �w _ � � I a 1GCEIS6GOT ONDRINLET6 18.n0 SMH UB 11IS i I ''6' \\ 3 DO 11 ♦0 -3 �' \ r a 1\ FFE = 3..5 ' -/ � FULL LENGTH OF PIPE WITH EF\ � Oq �,1 - FM\BFE = 389.5 1 I I �' CAP AND THRUST BLOCK PAST `` I tJ6p * / ,yyy GATE VALVE / 6,; 1 CB #4 1 16'0" �- i� / j��,r Y � 3B2 '•-•._ _.._-_S c, 19a SMH#9 A S W 390 / PRC- I I'.. I / / QBi � //////��380 _•�•.- 3#3A � �I"S\1HN25� SOH35 PVC _ 500 _3 _ m 1 � � 1�6 I„/ f i I.I2 \\ \ 15 WIDE U UTILITY EASEMENT TO' W y{ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1 / C ORDINATECONSTRUCTION OF NEW \ --- - mF P W B_CL52 DI WA \ \I, \_ I/ I r 4 ) I I I DRIVEWAY TO EXISTING HOUSE WITH r; : 6" SDR35 Pf SEWER, TUP FFE • \ 3(0._ / HOME OWNER. PROVIDE MINIMl1MOF tY \ r ' : 3l4" TYPE 1(' COPPER WATER , \ I 1 \ \ 1\ / I 3 SHE • 2 / GRAVEL SUBBASE AND 2.5" TYPE 111 PAVEMENT , CB »BI 1 • P€ i ! 1 \'1I \ I - + 3 �' EWfVO SERVICE BCURBSTOP, /CFfMi C�6Y 1 1 \ 24'PEWITH E.3I / 1 33 W / / 1 I B I 1 AV �•VI1 ,Nv=a33so 1 ( � 1 32 BFE -FFE303.0 li 381.8 41FDMH- 0� FFE.3B3.80 \ FDMH \ CIS1REYP1 / \ 1 I W I , r r ki BFE.386.3 _ a91 DR36 PVG FO � 1 \ J + J1 CIASS2wETIAND a I \\ [=3855 31 I l NEW 1"IN •3B4.0T : 1 S 9 I \\ 1 \\ \ I 11 \ W ( 1 I I t _J r CIN•381.8] . r fo° `7B e^w •3e1.e2 1,;`] i, 1 J \ \�\1 �1 \ I \ 1 \ \ 1'w N I / EXIST. HOUSE \^' \ 1 1 > +OO I I / g � =iN 3 ) \� � \ '\I «\ I � off, BFE•366.6 ,MATCH LINE STA. 24 I ; E , +�" r I ( Is rl I 40 14 \ SEE SHEET 3 FOR LEGEND AND NOTES I BFE=3653 CATCH BASIN DATA SEWER MANHOLE DATA.p CB#1 CB#5 Ce#10 SMH#1 BUR #4\.�\ 6, ( I STA. 10+87, 12' LT. STA. 13+80 12' RT. STA 20+15. 12' RT. STA. 11+50, CL STA 15+50, CL ( ZI �% / 1 \ I1 5U W ER �rr1 \ IZ4 '' ,M„ #, - I I FFE = 30`./.1 0 1 II RIM =388.30 RIM'-38935 RIM=38725 RIM 389.91 RIM=38887 BFE=308.o I (2) 6" UD IN - 384.80 6' UD IN • 385.35 B" UD IN = 383.25 6" IN = 383.28 8" IN = 381.08 39 15"IN=38470 6'UD OUT =386.35 15"IN-383.05 8"OUT=383.18 8"OUT =380.98 \ � I 35 1 \ \ I FDMH 15" OUT = 384 65 15" IN = 385.15 15" OUT = 383.00 15" OUT = 385 10 SMH #2 SMH #5 FFEf303A0 CB # 2 CB # 11 STA. 14+00, CL STA. 20-33.14, CL S _ �� _ - I I ' STA. 10+87, 12' RT. CB # 6 STA. 20+15, 12' LT. RIM - 389.62 RIM . 387 84 I m 1 s-� - \ II , \ \\ 1. / 1 30 RIM =388.30 STA. 50+50, 1VRT. RIM=387.25 (2)8"IN=381.93 8"IN=378.51 � �' .. I I 1 - \\ \ \ 11 I BFE=385.5 (2)6"UD IN=384.95 RIM -389.10 6"UD IN=383.25 8"OUT=381.83 8"OUT =378.41 '^ W J 15" IN = 384.95 REVISIONS (SEE eELow, LEFT, 8' UD IN = 385.60 15' OUT = 383.25 L 1 m 15'OUT =384.90 6"UD OUT=386.10 SMH #3 SMH #8 f o \ _ INV'383.Bo \ I 1� _ SEE SHEET 3 THESE PUNS WITH UTFSf REVISIONS SHOULD a CB # 2A 15" IN - 385.40 CB # 12 STA. 53+00, CL STA. 22+26.34, CL = 1 \z<' £ - FD- - / 1 \ 1 I I ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 15" OUT = 385.35 STA. 22+10, 12' LT. RIM - 391.65 STA. 18+24.48 CL _ \ , RIM=383.00 I SKETCH/CONCEPTRIM = 389.20 8" IN • 384.18 RIM = 389.78 r � s ". 1 m _ _ � }- _ 15"OUT = 385.10 CS#7 6"UD IN 8"OUT=384.08 8"IN(S)=380.26�-�'- 0 PRELIMINARY CB # 3 STA. 50+50. 1 V LT. 6" UD OUT = 8" IN (W) = 379.61 �. - f STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 8 GRADING NOTE: FINAL RIM=389.10 18'IN=383.85 8"OUT=379.51 \ : `38 S l\ THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT. THIS Q RECORD DRAWING STA 12+17, 12' LT. 6' UD IN • 385.60 24' OUT = 383.60 \, -FE • 394a0 \ PERMIT REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND RIM"UD OUT FOUNDATION DRAIN MANHOLE DATA RE 385.s o ROOFTOP GUTTERS (IF INSTALLED) COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP prof. no. 6" UD OUT = 386.10 14008 (2) 6" UD OUT = 387.05 1 36 IN=384.05 15'OUT =385.80 CB#13 FDMH #4 FDMM#7 N I' w FFE =309.80 DISCONNECTION DETAIL ON SHEET 15. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION SPEAR MEADOWS 16"O 15' OUT = 384.00 STA 22+75, 12' RT. \ , BFE:386a DETAIL APPLIES 1 THE REAR HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR survey CS#8 RIM=389.85 RIM INIOUT.5 RIM =387.0 - , ' / ` UNITS 23-26, 28-31833-37. ARESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 8"IWOUT=383.25 (2)6"IN =382.30 CB # 3A STA 16+64, 12' RT. e" UD IN = FDMH #5 8' OUT = 382.30 1 �' 1 ' I \ SNOW STORAGE: SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON tlesign STA. 12+49,411RT. RIM =388.00 WUD OUT = SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: ABR 15' OUT = 384.30 (2�' UD IN = 384.00 18" IN = 384 05 RIM = 385.75 FDMH #8 / : o s H '. + I - ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE drawn 15' OUT = 383.75 18" OUT = 384.00 8" INUOUT = 381.80 RIM = 389.0 o 1 SIDEWALK/PATH AND CURB SITE PLAN & ASIR STA1312' LT. CB # 9 CB # 25 CB#4 FDMH #8 B"IN/OUT =384.20 -� \37 \ _ IN THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE 1 RIM.=389.39.35 STA. 16+64,12'LT. RIM =387.50 RIM =386.0 RIMH#9 \ GRAPHIC SCALE aG 6" IN/OUT = 383.20 RIM •388., • ,_ _ �. ' 90 ' \ UTILITIES - NORTH 6" LID IN OUT = .35 RIM = 388.00 15" IN = 383.33 - m o 15 30 B1 120 0 date 6" UD OUT = 386.35 6" I WOUT = 382.53 _ ,N `IS'81 (2)6" UD IN = 384.00 15' OUT = 383.28 EXISTING HOUSE AND _ � 1 I 06-06-16 15" IN = 384. 3 15" IN = 383.55 GARAGE TO BE REMOVED 1 I\ STORM STRUCTURE DATA stole 15" OUT a 384.85 15' OUT = 383.50 CB It 28 -- / RIM =387.50 STORM TANK#1 TEMPORARY PAVED 1 / 1 1m1 I1n roeq LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED 15" IN = 382.80 GRATE NORTH = 392.2 TURNAROUND `` \ '. �\ 1 MM = 30 h. Co selling Engineer, Inc. 15" OUT = 382.75 GRATE SOUTH = 392.1 `\ \ DI OBOE-17 DEL SIDEWALK ON SOUTH SIDE VALE M ABR 14 Morse Drive hl. no. 15" IN • 383.88 _ / _ \ Essex Junction, VT 05452 / OI-20-1] REVISE POND WEST INLET GRADING, STORM TANK PER CITY ABR Tel: 802-8]5-0450 15" OUT = 383.83 ,,9`7'-- - _ \ .. \ i 03-13-17 REVISE STORM POND WEST, PIPING, ACCESS. ADD SNOW ST.1 MR SNOWSTORAGE /./ /' t\ I ! {-A00„-, SNOW STORAGE IS PROVIDED: (� �{ \ / \ --\ ( \ ,-- •• / •� �. __ _.,_ _ -_ / SEE SHEET 4 \ -' ALONG THE STREETS IN THE GREEN STRIP BETWEEN THE / I ^ \ ( - / �. \ F - \ RE VE TREES FOR / SIDEWALK/PATH AND CURB - \ \ -/ '-" /' /J ) /J / \ �, co TRUCTION OF PAVED PATH J 13 THE FRONT YARD ON THE SIDES OF THE PRIVATE DRIVE / / / 1 - \� � 4p2--'- \ ) / / _ - IN THE DESIGNATED AREAS ON LOT 54 REMOVE TREES FOR / _ ._ _- ( CONSTRUCTION OF PAVED PATH / - ,_• �' X THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY- 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION \-400"� /^-.�_�_-�\ _ ��.�•� �--�- , _ 10 �9AVFU / \% PROPOSED PAVED PAJ EMENT \�,.. >A0 3y� - ,"y PO` _-'$J� •s m 2 ,� SIDE OFSWTHB T INGTON � - - 'h Y' - Y 0 BRANCHES ON E%ISTING TREES SHALL SIDELINE OF EASEMENT SHALL SE 5 0'g9 I BE TRIMMED TO A HEIGHT OF 10 FEET WEST OF CONSTRUCTED PATH \ ALONGTHENEWPAVEDPATH \ __ -'_-,^ 1 _. �"'� .Fl+ - ` END CURB 90� - >S /\ �' °• C FDMH 39e ... _ ._396- _. - / s:� 'Go. LOT 54 �O t9 PAVED PATH 39 PROPOSE015' WIDESIOEWPLK 21 "' ST/q . _EASEMENT TO CITY OF SOUTH ry / 11 \ 35x 3% BURLINGTON 9 I / / .1 _ - ` _' "' 2S OO { 1 ~ m O _396- - / I 12 •-�-� ,y { { 11 FEE-399.50 ' 4/ .._392",., ,- 1 ALO LOT53-389.2 I BEE-390.0 l -. ._.L r_�_ ry CB 2 0 - 20 �Q- - 1 10 I BEE 389.] I _..-... _•3 ` � / I J Y m a SEE =397.5 CB a25 / -368.] TVPIGL-'TYPE:I(%'- \\.. - /3�h`•' LS'P BM •389.2 r FFE.398.6 \394._. COPPER WATE0. \•_ a / 14 v 1 { { I SEE•388.9 _SERVICEBCURBSTOP a A m I '. � 1 / FFE • 388.00 � 110 19 - + a \ I BFE I « I h 397 50 a I FFE8 ____ FDMH .._ ._ + , � \ TYOPPI -396.6 J 3_� 87.3 CPEARL 3Wl6A"TTEYRPE K / - _ - / 39866 « CERVICE 8 CURBSTOP _FDl FFE 3982 a 1 g FFE•3%.6 BFE=388.] • {__..' 392 F o _ -} F, BFE•9B8.8 u. ._ ,. •- 5'CANCHFTf_SIDEWWK a, L52 DIWATER 1' a 396- 29r SMH - �yao FFE = 396.75 C - FD �++ W - _ U BFE = 38625 S _ --------- PC �� -i- _ - m R35 PVG - - - ; U - S - 27 lY`t ` B 5 - \SAS CB #19 I TYP. 6' SDR35 I q 3 PVC SEWER � \) N _ T U _ 'SqF 3 - 3� _ - 0" SDR35 PV $ SMH a) - --- 1390 � _ - - \ ` 3 0• CL52 DI WATER / � CB p23 N 3& CLA552 WETLAND 22 a E=399.00 -"3- - / 27 6'SDR35PVC Z4 FFBFE=389.5 ; • / -_ k5 a 7/ 9/ I FFE=397.T I SEWER, TYP. BFE • 388.2 25 IFEE =388.70 3g8 v' 3W 1 I I 29// I N I FEE - 398.70 396 SEE • 98B.2 I f / DEPRESSED CURB_ I FEE /f957 I BEE=369.2 BFEl 3862 394 396 3 396 Fr - BFE =:ws v - - 0 - - SEE SHEE 2 - 6 3DR35 PVC SEWER, TVP. 3 O � iD--�"' / _ - - -- SS - PUBLIC OPEN SPACE NOTES; / J- 8"� PVC - _ TTT--- I 392 26 1 - - -FD- - - _ \_ \;- = _ - - - Be - - - - - F'7 I. COORDINATE THE HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE WATER, SEWER, AND FOOTING DRAIN V IV WIDE GRAVEL PATH _ 4 - ----- - - --- _SS - - - -'- - FOCO INV=387.9 `6. / TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO EACH BUILDING WITH THE OWNER AND ARCHITECTURAL I.I- 3Bp - -F� N (SEE CROSS COUNTRY PLANS. _ ��;^J PATH CROSS SECTION) 2. 8 IORTRVICOC S-IROMTHCMCHI ECTURAL PLAIN OF THE BE THE LEV / - - - - i - -386" $ SERVICES FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE COMPARED TO THE ELEVATION OF I _ _ /. _ _ _ , `- -' ...... _ r THE COLLECTION MAINS AND SERVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLAINS. REPORT ANY FDMH - �SsR�S W� FD'- 1 i � � '$ ._ ._. -- -" "-� -� F ' 9 END DEFINED CHANNEL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER. �,(S, ,_ ,- / : • 3. COORDIOMER.NATE UNLESS LOCATION OF THE SIDEWALK MANTRANC S TOLOPE ON ANYBUILDINGIWALK IS THE _ OWNER. UNLESS STEPS ARE PROPOSED. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ANY SIDEWALK IS 8%. / ._ - -� ' � $ �• \ _ - � • _ _ _ - - � 5 SLOPES GREATER THAN 5%MAY REQUIRE A HAND RAIL. M �• _. - - - �' - - DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES E RLMPS.INSTALLED DETECTALE THE WANING PLATES LTESSHALL AND �,.�•' - •-• -• y-(REAM, CHANNEL. _. _ �• d PAVED PATHS. AND AT CROSSWALK RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNING MTES SHALL BE EKE i • • •'-'=- _- •.• -_-, a CLASS R WE'TLAND CAST IRON. FOR PAVED PATHS, A SEGMENT OF CONCRETE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR !.. INSTALLATION OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES. ' I / S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE STUSS BEYOND PHASE LIMITS FOR FUTURE EXTENSION {) ' ACROSS BOARDWALK INTO OTHER PHASES (SEWER, WATER, STORM, UD, ETC.). _ ACROSSW ROVA ETU`910 I ' �/� 8. CO ORDINATE UTILITY MAINS AND SERVICES WITH THE DEVELOPER AND UTILITY COMPANY, GLASS 2 7. NEW STREET LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES SHALL CONFORM WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS SEWER MANHOLE DATA CATCH BASIN DATA �) ' ,. - - -.-SB_ -.- STANDARDS. °� OB-0B17 DEL SW SOUTH SIDE VALE DR. TO PATH 8 BOARDWALK MR SMH #7 SMH 31+ CB # 14 CB # 17 CB # 20 CB 11125 BOARDWALK CONCRETE STA. 24+50, CL STA.393.48L STA.25+00, 12'RT. STA. 28+78.75, 12'LT. RIMw393.70 STA. 34+so, 1r LT, LEGEND I ABUTMENT B BACKWALL 03-13-17 PATH TO BOARDWALK IHRU WETLAND IN OS. ADD SNOW 3T PBR RIM=392.00 RIM=393.48 RIM=39210 RIM =39390 12"OUT =389,50 RIM =394.30i REVISIONS 8'IN=381.48 8"IN=385.26 6"UD IN=38810 6"LID IN=3%90 -S �-s- NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE (2)6" UD IN = 390.55 8"OUT = 381.38 8" OUT = 385.18 6" UD OUT = 389.10 6' UD OUT = 390.90 CB # 21 15" OUT = 390.55 .I iKSE BANS N#RN LATESTPURPOSE SHOWN REVISIONS SHOULD / OF STA. 31+30, 23,& RT. 'O'-FD- - - - -� - - - -FD- - - NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE 1 ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSC SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SMH #8 SMH#11 15"IN=387A0 15" OUT = 389.40 RIM -392.50 1,.;. STA. 26+50, CL STA. 33+00, CL 18" IN = 385.25 CB # 24 _ _ _ _ NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE & UNDERDRAIN _"� { ) O SKETCH/CONCEPT 18"OUT = 385.20 CB # 18 (2�" UD IN = 389.00 STA 34+50, 12' FIT \ \ _ ) RIM=394.00 RIM=395.88 15"IN=38665394.30{ \ 0 PRELIMINARY 8' O = = 382. 6" IN = 388.10 STA. 395.8, 12' RT. RIM = qg0 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR { CB#15 RIM =395.80 15"IN=38865 l � J� � FINAL 8" OUT = 382.48 8" OUT = 386.00 15" IN IN . 390.40 { \ y STA. 25+00. 12'LT. (2�"UD IN =391.80 15"OUT•388.80 15"IN=39040 �i.-W~~- NEW WATER MAIN BHYDRANT i \ '.'�\ / \ _ � RECORD DRAWING SMH #9 RIM = 392.10 15" IN = 387.35 CB # 22 15' OUT = 390.35 'A6 FM NEW FORCEMAIN STA. 29+29, CIE 6'UD IN=388.10 15"OUT=387.30 SPEAR MEADOWS 14008. STA. 31+30, 12' LT. - - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE vey RIM = 396..0 15" O OUT387.6010 RIM = 393.00 / \ / -. 8" IN = 38a.08 - - ( ° A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT t. 15"OUT•387.60 CB#18 (2�'UD IN=389.00 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE( 1 a deai 8" OUT = 383.98 STA. 30+21, 12' LT. CB # 16 RIM = 394.30 15" OUT - 388.85 - - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE \ ., _ - L , tt2 :j ,:iq y 1 + gn STA. 28+76.75, 12' RT. 6" UD IN = 390.30 M PROPOSED STREET LIGHT X H `" H y�\�qr )` d RIM=393.90 6'UD OUT=391.30 CB#23 SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON FOUNDATION DRAIN 8" UD IN - 389.80 12" IN = 388.00 STA. 33+00, 12' RT. EXISTING TREE LINE P- BLIP �EI•{ISPACq ;j ;� d own j 7I MANHOLE DATA 6"UD OUT=390.90 15"IN=388.00 RIM=39050--------39Q--�--�----�---- EXISTING CONTOUR 5 � i � i " _. - d � ± d `� 1 d SITE PLAN & ABR FDMH#1 FDMH#3 15"IN(E)=389.20 15"OUT=387.95 15"IN D38880 39150 - - ' WETLAND BUFFER _ checked RIM=397.0 RIM=395.5 t5"IN:(W)=386.20 15"OUT=388.55 WETLAND BOUNDARY I 1 5 .N + UTILITIES -SOUTH DJG 6"IN/OUT=386.50 6'IN/OUT=3134.50 18"OUT=386.15 w EXISTING WATER LINE dote FDMH #2 FDMH #8 s ��S- EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE GRAPHIC SCALE 06-06-16 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTE: 30 0 15 90 80 120 scale RIM = 396.0 RIM = 389.0 ��' UTILITY POLE 8 OVERHEAD WIRE 8'IN/OUT=385.70 8"IN/OUT=384.20 THIS PROJECT T SUBJECT TOASTATE OUND THE HOMES PERMIT. THIS PERMIT LAMOUREUgi&r%Im. SON AS NOTED REQUIRES THAT THE SITE GRADING AROUND THE HOMES AND ROOFTOP -X X- EXISTING FENCE Consulting Englneere, Inc. GUTTERS IF INSTALLED COMPLY WITH THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL In W 14 Mm Drive t, no. ( ) �_____________� EXISTING CATCH BASIN BCULVERT l 1 ON SHEET 15. THE ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL APPLIES TO THE REAR 1ln0•90 n. Essex luncdon, vT05452 HALF OF THE ROOFTOP AND YARDS FOR UNITS 23-26, 28-31 & 33-37. Tel: 802-87"50 � I �I _.___ ``_ /- \`,\\' "390��__\i _`_--`` `_ /a � G"T� \J VT Crld �\-_.._ \_-•\\\\ ... _3gq\ f -386__ -' PATH LOCATION SUBJECTTO CHANGE \ \\\\\ _ ^- •�\ (+/- 5 FEET) WITH FINAL DESIGN TO AVOID ♦\ -` -"- - ^� `- EXISTING TREES ALONG HEDGEROW. 3e2 10- PAVED PATH I- - - - -- \ a W TYP — — — \ .� � .. --'• --�-NEW B'CL52 DI WATER W�..�� - - .� - _ •-_ - 88- _ ..... tl , _ J \ c` -E( CONSTRUCTION. 8"CL52 DI STUB FOR FUTURE USE, _ LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH UVM AT TIME OF L �.-B'CL52 5WAT1 -TYP. _ 380-_ WIDE UTILITY AND PATH EASEMENT-3Bq TO HE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT&STATE \ I -.3TB B' CL52 DI STUB FOR FUTURE USE, \ \ \ i AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE \ \ LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED WITH ♦ 8'�- WF TREE,TYPIC TOTA211rL 14 TREES. •.` TREE. TOTAL OF t4 TREES. SPECIES TO \ WM AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. \ INCLUDE SARGENT CHERRY, COMMON _ 24" X B' TAPPING HACKBERRY, SKYMASTER ENGLISH OAK \ -- SLEEVE &VALVE �+T LEAST 4 OF EACH SPECIES) EXISTING 2A' 01 CWD HIGH, \ \ ) SERVICE TRANSMISSION MAIN i PLAN OF CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN lI I w GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 w in (In feel) 1,c =308. WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEW WATER SYSTEM TESTING, FLUSHING, AND DISINFECTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON OLIVIA DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET. CUT AND CAP THE EXISTING WATERMAIN ON NOWLAND FARM DRIVE NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH SPEAR STREET. THE PINNACLE AT SPEAR NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE FED BY THE NEW WATER SYSTEM THROUGH THE SPEAR MEADOW NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE WORK, CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE WATER DEPARTMENT ON THE SEQUENCING AND EXECUTION OF THIS WORK IS CRITICAL TO ITS SUCCESS. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT, THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT, AND THE VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE CROSSINGS. B' SDR35 PVC SEWER, TYP, 3M TYPE'K' COPPER WATER SERVICE& CURBSTOP, TYP. ~\ SEE SHEET 2 I 29` l \ VALVE PITS I SEWER PUMP STATION EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK — X - 392 _ 2\\ ` \ \ •' -390- VALE D 8'SUP35 WC Nd ti Bkt /1 ✓ FI _ 3B8 _ /_ 3 302�: 9TORMWATER POND I% LEGEND —s m s— THE CONTRACTORf SHALL PROVIDE ADVANCENOTICE T ALL USERS TH/�LSNILL BE AFFECTED BY ANY TEMPORARY SHUT- DOWN TO ACCOM LISH THE PROPOSED WORK. THE CONTRACTOR- LL COMPLETE THE ABOVE WORK AND RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREA TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BEATER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS. ago r - -... _ - �.-- -- / \ �� -, l \ •� _......._ _ � - -��1t .ems �w--�— Pr KISTING SMH TO 1 ! H GRADE —X X— _ EX19TING SIDEWALKTO BE REMOVED - 1 MST. CB k2B / \396` i %CONST�CTNEW ' - 910EWM. RAMP 3 DRIVE 19r. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DI GSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION e- GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 00 120 (n feel) 1'— = 30 B. NEW SEWER LINE & MANHOLE NEW FOOTING DRAIN & MANHOLE NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE & UNDERDRAIN FINISH GRADE CONTOUR NEW WATER MAIN & HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CONTOUR WETLAND BUFFER WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WATER LINE EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING CATCH BASIN & CULVERT SEE SHEET 3 FOR NOTES REVISIONS OF - � SKETCH/CONCEPT k E DRIVE M PRELIMINARY M FINAL EA CATCH BASIN DATA RECORD DRAWING r.c z Pro} no. DRIVE tSIDMALK�P CBM26 SBA. 40+47, 13.75' RT. ESTA,XISTING EXISTINGCB9'R T. ING C 19' 9 SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 RIM = 394.80 EXIST. RIM = 394.52 survey N '6^UD IN=390.80 NEW RIM=395.40 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D 12• ouT = 3es.2s a^ UD IN = 3so.52 4'FDIN=390.82 SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON desi 9" CB#27 STA. 40+47, 13.76 LT. NEW 12" IN = ABR drawn % I TO REMAIN RIM =394.80 .57 12"OUT=388.57 SITE PLAN & UTILITIES ABR I 6"UD IN=390.80 EXISTING CB#28 PINNACLE AT SPEAR & checked CONSTRUCT DRIVE BETWEEN NEW 12"OUT=3W.25 $TA. 40+50' 19' LT. DJG STREET AND EXISTING DRNE. EXIST. RIM. 394.84 X-COUNTRY WATERLINE date COORDINATE WITH HOMEOWNER (MIN IMUMI8"GRAVELSUBBASE _. __._. NEW RIM = 395A5 06-06-16 AND 2.5" TYPE IV PAVEMENT! __ _,....-....., _... _.. / -' 4" UD IN = 391.69 %' --'- -- / 4" FD IN = 391.54 scale / I " NEW 12IN=390.00 LAMOUREUX&DICKINSON AS NOTED / I 12" OUT = 389.84 Cng Englneerq lnn. / I 14 MomeMoree Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 Tel: 802.8]8-4450 PVI STA = 10+92.33 Iww PVI ELEV = 388.18 PVI STA = 12+22.21 10a Vc PVT STA 16+64 A.D. = 5.00 PVI ELEV = 392.08 PVI STA = 13+50 �i, PVI ELEV 388.30 =.25 u+ K =18 00 A.D. =-4.73 K=21.14 N �f $ PVI ELEV • 389.87 % A.D.=1.23 g A.D. BOVC $ O1 ♦ $ K=81.32 �� K40'15� 394 C rfi V m W Q J� 394 A 392 392 390 390 388 31 388 388 384 384 382 382 380 380 378 378 376 376 DAIVN JWV 374 374.00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD j OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW. SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING pro} n SPEAR MEADOWS a4008 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR PROFILE ABR ABR SPEAR MEADOW ROAD D,e GRAPHIC SCALE 06-06-16 scale 30 0 15 30 60 I. & DICTCINSON AS NOTED uftingOUREUX Canaulting Engineer; Inc. ht. n (In feel) 14 Monc Drivc � 1 o-kn=300. Eauxteecti-,VTO5452 Tel: 802-87&U50 5 N NHW� z FINISH BADE -0.50% m FINISH GRADE 7 FROM CB W2 OUTLET TO FR CB Its TO CB W7 STORMWATER PON T CS W4_EXISTING `EXIST/ryQ G_ROUNp ' I I �S= 058 FTIFT OUTLET O ------� Y 130'x15"PE S = 0.005 FT/FT 180' 15" PE B GROUND STORM TER POND S = 0.005 FT'/PT FROM CS #6T CB W5 p 8.0 250k8• SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FF/FT R S = 0.005 FROM SM 7 275'x8 SDR35 PVC 5 = .006 TYPICAL STR ET FINISH GRADE ELEV TION 388 DATUM 974.00 22 00 23+00 24+00 25*00 26+00 27+00 28+00 PVI STA = 31.35.69 PVI ELEV = 398.26 PVI STA - 34+50 PVI ELEV = 392.98 A.D. = 3.25 PVI ELEV - 394.39 loo'VC AD 319 K=3077 CLu U ]� a TO CS #24 e GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 ep m oe leer REVISIONS THESE PUNS WITH LATEST REVF40NS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR Fill PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pro} no. su—y A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR PROFILE ABR VALE DRIVE DJGKe' STA. 20+00 - 35+50 a°I° 06-06-16 scale 30*00 31+00 32+00 OUR LAMOUREUgi & D, ON AS NOTED 33+00 34+00 35*00 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Inc. 14 Mone Drivc hi, no. Esser lunclion, VT05952 Tel: 802-8]e-4450 n Sl.6V CENTERLINE ROAD 398 � 3 FINISH GRADE + 39B �n 396 388 394 v) N m � a 394 v EXISTING GROUND 392 FROM CB#17 y ry F CENTERLINE RDA 392 -------- m FINISH GRADE — ------- 390— FROM CB#15 — 'e = TO CB#14 ------- -- 390 u m _—_ 388 _—�--� 8"CL52 DI ATER EXISTING o Z ---- _ —_ -- -- ----� ---- _— 5=0.005 FTIFT 219k15'PE 386 � S = 0.005 FTIFT 179'z18' PE FROM CB 11 � --5=0.0051 FT/FT 228'x18"PE 386 — — — -- ---- � � S = 0.007 FT FT '—S IFT 384 geyc e'TPE V S = 0.008 FTIFT __ 27g� 8' SDR35 PVC S 0.005 FT � " CL52 DI WATER 382 R35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT O TO OLITLE7 TO STORMWATE POND 223k8" SDR35 PVC S = 0.005 FTIFT � 380 STO MWATER POND 380 193'x8" DR35 PVC S = 0. 5 FTIFT 378 FROM SMH #4 � W 378 TO SEWER PUMP ST TION 376 TYPICAL THE T CENTERLINE -- 378 FINISH GRADE 376 20+00 21+00 + �g PVI STA=29+00 . . _ K=28.82 � ioVW A.D. = 2.50 K=40.00 WI ELEV =398.50 �� tar VC ffi T A.D. _ -2.49 K . 40.10 w � w 398 396 396 FINI N c� 394 i 394 FROM C #20 392 — TO CB 19 FROM C8 #25 Z -------- __ ---- F -- T CB lag CB lt21 392 390 ------- -- —� --�.� — S 0.005 FTIFT II -- S=0.005 /FT 180'xi5 ------ -- 380 S 0.005 FTIFT 118k15' E V 8• CL 52 DI Ogg0.005 FTIFT 120k1S' E WATER 388 9" CL52 DI Wq�.R 386 388 �— 14 z _ $ M 218' SDR35 PVC S 0.0050 FTIFT 384 � w 384 382 F- W � E rn 382 380 = 380 378 378 378 378 374 374 29+00 38+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 VALE DRIVE STA. 35+50 - 41+00um— REVISIONS THESE NAILS WON LATEST REYISNINS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOB THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SNEEIS � SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL w p RECORD DRAWING m pro} no. DATUM (D 2 SPEAR MEADOWS ;4w°B aOO _ U s A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D a ., ` o SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR aQ PROFILE dr— 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 ABR ABR VALE DRIVE (35+50 — 41+00) `DJG HALCYON LANE 3o GRAPHIC SCALE a 15 30 tom & HALCYON LANE °ete 06-06-16 O�,eep LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON addle AS NOTED inch = 3o n Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Moru Chivc sti1. no. Esualeoclion, VT 05452 Tel: 802-678-4450 PVI STA = 37+50 $ $ Y PVI ELEV = 398.14 A.D. _ -2.23 Z U K=44.77 > Q � � CENTERLINE ROAD FINISH GRADE O w w 398 — 398 H ee N_ — 396 "�� EXISTIN GROUND wF �m El.6V F n m 394 Z * x 382 382 m 390. ____� 390 -- _ _. _ _ � — -- 388 _______— z � 388 FROM JTO CB #5#e FROM CB#7 OCB #e A 388 388 384 52 pl WATER 304 �� 301k8' S R35 PVC S = 0.0 1 FTI 382 382 3� 380 8, 378 \ __ / -. / •'new �:/ ,_ �e ..... % - _ � _ GRAPHIC SCALE ;- \\\BD o zg so, 10o zoo7 AB n 92 1 (M 7 5o ft. inah TO - 'r151 l=\ 12 '12T= s \ LjjPGJ \I SEE INSET BELOW FOR /c REMAINDER OF\1 LANDSCAPING PLAN \(t I//� I'sus -I � � _ � � -axe I I 1 AR d — /// 50M //• � �.- %" � � `\ \\ '� \ I SEE SHEET 4 FOR sa-- s L _ •s i` / � .\ I I II - _ .. " -. '^✓ \. � '. I, ✓ \ 7 TB �� THE CONTRACTOR'DIGSAFE'PRIOR TO SHALL NOTIFY B 11 ISUN 1 % _j _ _ TYPICAL WETLAND BUFFER 4 PG I ,\ '� W'- I I� _ TO BE MARKED (SEE NOTES 1 THIS SHEET) 7 � K` _I <,> /.__ 1 0 a �1 II �--' STREET TREE (TYPICAL) � e� ..- - -) ' \ .. - �. •-' TYPICAL WET BUFFO TO BE MARKED SEE NOTE THIS SHEET) I t //� \ __ / ?.• I THE WETLAND BUFFER SHALL SE r MARKED WITH BOULDERS ON THE \-✓ ) SOUTH SIDE OF THE WETLAND -�-- THROUGH THE PARK OPEN SPACE / ; )FYPICAL WETLAND B PER / 8 UA i� �. �\! I ,•Y. E DRIV v P 'TOBEMARKED(SEE ,Sgti NOTES THIS SHEET 7 MARKER CK SHALL ABOVEA (�, / / % / n MINIMUM OF 12 BELI ABOVE GRADE 11 GR WETLAND BUFFER DEMARCATION SPECIFICATIONS /� - „-- AND 121NCHE5 BELOW.THE ROCK A t WETLANDDEMAROUNDARIES ATEDUSINGINEITHER THE OCONTONS SHOWN ORALHEPLAIN NGHALL 2d INCHES. AVE NO DIMENSIONLESS THAN \\ t11 OR BOULDERS. BEFORE SETTING BOULDERS OR FENCE POSTS, THEY SHALL EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC INSET SCALC 3 PSS I 1 BE STAKED TO INSURE THAT THEIR LOCATIONS ACCURATELY DELINEATE 50 " If�! IS ON THE PLANS. / 5 PLANT LIST THE EDGE OF THE WETLAND BUFFER OR LIMITS OF IMPACT AS SHOWN ( n n ," / < / • I I , -.__� , 1 I 2. SPLIT RAIL FENCING SHALL CONSIST OF ROT -RESISTANT WOOD OR OTHER DURABLE MATERIAL AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD - 9 AL f w - CONDITION. I (... L, 3. BOULAND2 RET FROM RMTHEL BE INSTALLEDST FENCE MAXIMUM 25FEETON IDONIN, AND 25 FEET FROM THE NEAREST FENCE POST WHEN TRANSITONING FROM ONE TO THE OTHER. �,.-•"/ � j� • l m ,. � n...::, I i � � 11 BOULDER FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPING PLAN NOTES: ..._ a 1. A MINIMUM OF 18 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AND 12 EVERGREEN SHRUBS SHALL BE 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THE ROADS AND THE PROPOSED PLANTED FORNTACH THE CUMULATIVENITSMAY NUMBER PLED UNITS. SEE OTHER PLAN SHEETS FOR STREET AND UTILITY DESIGN INFORMATION. 14 PS II 1�J GMULTIDWELLING E DWELLING BUILDINGCONTAININGMULTIPLEDWELLING UNITSMAYpE AP PORTIONED AROUND THE TI AROUND THE O LOCATION OF WINDOWS. PORCHES, DECKS, ER OF THE BUILDING BASEDOTHER DECKS, RETAINING WALLS, AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS. SITE 2.M THIS ADJU ST INTERIOR TO PRESENT STALLA THE N DUELANDSCAF`INGCO LAN CONSTRUCTED THE ION OF H LOCATION OAL LOCATION MAY BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTED LOCATION OF THE HOMES, I /(J R UA I 2. PLANTS SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE LISTS BELOW, BASED UPON THE BUILDINGS EXPOSURE. A MINIMUMANDENSHRUBS)BE SELECTED FROM EACH RETAINING WALLS. AND UTILITIES. FINAL GRADING, GRACING, GROUP (DECIDUOUS SHRU&4 ANI EVERGREEN SHRUBS) n FOR SUNNY UNITS FACING SOUTH AND WEST r71 TRIM STREET TREES TO PROVIDE 6 FEET BETWEEN THE GROUND AND THE FIRST TREE BRANCH —8-17 REV PER ARBORIST COMMENTS AND DRB FINAL APPROVAL BJT �P UMB TREE TRUNK OS11.17 REVISE WETIANO BUFFER DEMARCATION B. 03-27-17 ADD PLANTINGS AT 1317 SPEAR. REVISE PER ARSORIST ABR TREE PIT 2- BUICK MULCH A MINIMUM REVISIONS �OF 8 FROM TRUNK THESE PLANS W17H LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF WVW V Vtr CUT AND REMOVE VIRE MESH BASKET. ONLY BF L6FD FOR THC PUBPOSf SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS CUT AND REMOVE ROPE AND OR UNDISTURBED SOIL BURLAP WRAP FROM TOP 2 OF Q SKETCH/CONCEPT FOOTBALL AFTER PLACEMENT IN TREE PIT. PRELIMINARY LOOSEN REMAINING BURLAP TO ALLOW FOR SHADY UNITS FACING NORTH AND EAST FOR ROOT DEVELOPMENT. � FINAL I OWL \ \' \ 5P \.,7REANSPL2.NIED x.1 .. .. ; \... I` ,`�'yVZ,,,. 1X PS / i11 ... Rry Qry Bmuni<ul Nomr Cm—NAme Site Remnrk3 Sven Trees AF 21 Arer rry lM b Mupk 2I/+ C B&& 6 foal brkwh M1n M AL 33 8wulu 1 R' B h 317` vl B&8.6 fam brunch heir nn en AR w ArnraArw I Sk G g' G Ih al HAS, 6(oN bench he In OT 23 GlavAnry I m 1Mv Nu(ku H 3 I/` f a I. S&B 6 Mnl —" nx ,e Y n PC 18 P m Burxe,u C' e Y BAB,6ram bmcM1n M1 M QM Q Bur Ox4 11&&6fial hooch ,e,M QR 25 CA, u S 94ymualw Bnxl all Ono , I ,I HAS.67ao1—im hcghl xcrvl unrxd 21rz `,I AB,6rw—im he In AL milli Llm 2ln 3•Cul. B&B,6 fom MnnaW h<'phl d PeT AB 22 Fr 41n6—itlM B&B 80 3 gpnlw 4m6Bheiyhl BtrB 15 Sw6 RhciFhl B&B mWtik 212•�3'Cel. BAS TU L'eJv BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION W/SHOVEL fJ RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS pro} 8 14008 AND BLEND PLANT MIX 1 %BALL DIA WITH EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE SOIL TRANSITIH survey 1. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON desi 9n 2. STAKING REWIRED ONLY IN AN SC PE WHERE TREES WILL BE SUBJECTED TO WINDY CONDITIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE ABR drown CONTRACTOR AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. TYARCHITECT.PERIOD. ABR 3. TREES SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER PLANTING. LANDSCAPE PLAN chatked [LAG 4. EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS, TREE WRAP, ROPE, STRING AND SURVEYOR TAPE PRIOR TO PLANTING TO PREVENT GIRDLING. dale 34 TN PLANT LIST - 1317 SPEAR STREET 06-06-16 APPROXIMA E LIMITS OF 2' HIGH (� ^` 3AA Vp(�^ �I 1 5 THERE SHALL BE NO WATERING BERM INSTALLED AROUND TREES EARTH BERM. COORDINATE `el ^-.•� WITH LANDOWNER. ��,R •'�,�+..:,�`� " / _ •• % r 6 PC 1 MA / .,�...... .. / 2 �' HEDGE TO REMAI / #1317 SP - REET MA 7J - - OUTH OF SMH Rry BrNuniral Name Cmnmun.N.— Siu Remarks MA M,.l...'.fdnmi Adum. ('rn I,le 12'Cu AB AA s,.,.m mlw pro •dnmm�us.�2„w xeisM Ae TN Thury <ur:Wmrv(k'"P. his cMnr w& a&B 9COIe 6. PLANT MIX SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING RATIO. 3 PARTS EXISTING SOIL, 1 PART TOPSOIL LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED 7. TREE PIT TO BE 3 TIMES AS WIDE AS ROOT BALL. Consulting Engineerv, Inc. [Int. no. 14 Morse D m e. PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR CRUSHED ROOTS AND DEAD OR INJURED BRANCHES. Eaux Junction, VT 05452 TREE PLANTING DETAIL Tel: apz-sT"50 8 W'S a. yam / — —— __\ "\ 1 - -- \ \ / \ „o, ,�. —,,,� _ _ / SEE INSET BELOW FOR REMAINDER OF VALE DRIVE '- y} WOODS 1'.... .. WOODS — _ SY• — - ..— TYP WT ENCEARONDT SLOPET �... ..........". \ — — `" 2WETLAND ETLA . _. PERIMETER ._ — — — — — ... • „> r � � .. — — ,. � L _ — — _, - _-- _ - •- .,a r MEADOW LLZED WORK EA FOR VALE DRIVE BUILDER CONST UCTION 0. .1/ w y y r / \ �^ THE STOR AT R BAS N9 SINLL Bfi USED AS SEDIMENTATION BASINS DUNING CONSTRUCTIOfi. } 1 THE SEDIMENTATION BASINSAD, BECONSTRUCTEDTO THE GRADES SHOWN EXCEPTTNTTHEFO MEADOW _ \ �+''^ • _ i ,_ / / r SHALL BE OVER EXCAVATED TO A D LTH OF t FOOT BELOW THE GRADES SHOWN / [// 2. TYPE I STONE FILL MAY BE PLACE�ON THE BASIN SIDESLOPES TO STABI= THE SOLL IF VEGETATION I / / 4 q+`,T \ _ \ / NOT BECOME ESTABLISHED I TO UGTUAPNG WATER LEVELS WRHIN THE BASIN, 3. THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT IN THE F REBAYS SHALL BE MCNITERED THROUGH T CONSTRUCTION ANT BE REMOVED WHENRREACHES ADE MOF2 FEET. _ LPG i MEADOW A SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM THE BASIN SH— BE DISPOSED IN AN UPLAND LOCATION W A SLOPE LESS 1 — — — — — 5% AND NO LESS TNAN'A FEET FROM A WETLAND OR STREAM, THE NATERUL SINLL BE SEEDED AND M MMEMATELY TO ESTABLISH VEGETATES COVER. — /\ y STORMWATER PONT) 1I t1 I -- Ws __ MEADOW q 1 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF REQUIREMENTS 1. WHERE ROOFTOPTHE EWILLENINGRTEDOVEAWNO "AUEVEGETATED TERRAIN TEMPORARILY TOGAS RPESTHEAREA REGENING RUNOFF RECEIVING BE MPOOR PERMANENTLY STAB0.IZEDBEFFF RUNOOFF RUNOFF. O . \J)� C TEMPORARY DIVERSION OF ROOFTOP RUNOFF OR RUNOFF FROM THE BUILDING ! L:IA i 2 WETLAND CONSTRUCTION AREA MAY BE NECESSAR DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT EROSION OR FOR THE TREA TM T TINSIT RUNOFF. THE RECEIVING AREA SHALL BE T MPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED PRIOR TO RECENING ANY DIVERTED RUNOFF. MEADOW S. WHERE ROOF GUTTERS WILL BE USED, BUT ARE NOT IN PEACE, A STONE DRIP EDGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT EROSION. A. EROSION MATTING SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL RODE GUTTER DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS AND \ . ,` \ J SHALL EXTEND SUCH THAT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED ONTO A STABILIZED OR VEWTATOO SURFACE. S. ERMATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS WHERE SURFACE GRADING ARWND THE BUIORIONLDINGS WILL RESULT N CONCENTRATED FLOW. —_ CV. S2 WETLAND J117 LEGEND CLASS 2 WETLAND STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT MEADOW \ \ — ' TEMPORARY SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE _ J I / �\ ,yT I ,•(— / / / STABILIZED STAGING I STORAGE EROSION AwmNG \ 1 e 1 I.CY ' } a CS INLET PROTECTION // NOTE // •t /" I / ' , / THEL•IMRS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MARKEDWITHA'ORANGE POLYESTER BARRIER II / � I I LAYM rj- �E%ISTING HOUSE :TO BE REMOVED ` 1� LAWN ,/. TAPE, CONSTRUCTION FENCE. OR SNOW FENCE. EXCEPT IN AREAS WRHIN SO FEET OF A PRESERVE TR OORSTREAMWHERECONSTRUCTq FENCEBNALLSEUSEDTO MARK THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. GRAPHIC SCALE so o 25 so lo0 200 T X62 XT"SO (n leel) t Incn . so e. OBOB-1T REVISEPERFINALPLATCONDTIONS ABR X-M1T REVISIWS PER PRELIMINARY COMMENTS/CONDITIONS ARR REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVIS NIS SIMLD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS E] SKETCH/CONCEPT E-1 PRELIMINARY FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING SPEAR MEADOWS A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON PrD; nD. 140 06 ey L&D deS'" ABR EROSION PROTECTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN d1DY,n ABR checked DJG dOIB 06-06-16 LiEDURN.Ur&DICKI\ti0\ ' nR F.nRineen, Enc. �1.1Amn<I I11 G M) m Dc Lsua ;on, v'r osasz 1 scale AS NOTED hl. n w RIGHT-OF-WAY R 10' S' SEE PLANS GREEN SPAC R PAVED PATH GREEN SPACE 4' TOPSOIL. TYP. 4" DOUBLE YELLOW LINE ' I I 2" THICK TYPE III FINISH COURSE PAVEMENT 3 1 g• CONCRETE I Y THICK TYPE I BASE CURB COURSE PAVEMENT MAX. S=0 02 MAIN ST. 3 _ STREET SIGNS TO BE MIR APPROVED EO .) S-t/J ,FI S=1/3'/FT I ' FORCHASED FROM CITY (OR APPROVED EQUAL) COURSE PAVETV MENTFINISH PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. COURSE PAVEMENT MINIMUM Ir FABRICJ I III THICK COURSEPAVEIEIIIBASE CLEAN STOW MINIMUM 24"FABRIC THICK GRAVEL BABE COURSE PAVEMENT J/400 NOT USE STONE OVERLAP IASPERSTATESPEC. I I 2• SQUARE TUBE. 12 00 NOT USE LIMESTONE ]01.06 OR p]04.05 FINE) � GAGE STEEL SIGN POST IV THICK GRAVEL BASE MIRMI 140N FABRIC OR EQUAL 12' THICK SAND I I O WA ((AS PER STATE SPEC. BORROW (AS PER 1N• MR4----1--r�- B, kT04.ON OR N]04.05 FINE) 6'PERF. PVC 50R 35 STATE SPEC. 070303AJ TER PUBLIC STREET WITH PATH TYPICAL SECTION NTS fip R RIGHT-0E-WAY R 1' 6' SEE PLANS SEE FILMS SEE PLANS 51' CONCRETE CONCRETE II SEE VTRANS BID 7-45 SIDEWALK slDEwnLK I I ANCHFOR ORREQUIREMENTSANDWEV 1"00UBLE YELLOW LINE I I 4' TOPSOIL' TYP. I u 5" THICK J500 PBI i 1n' THICK TYPE III FINISH 18' MIN CONCRETE SIDEWALK COURSE PAVEMENT 3 T6-THICK AT DRIVES) --I1 GGURBRETE ® THICK STREET NAME SIGN S ' =a 02 N.T.S. J/i —_ I IORAFI 000X GEOTEXTILE - �wS-tl3'IF1 'S=1fa'/FT— SEE FOR IOFI APPROVED EOUALI � - SIDEWALK LOCATION V THICK GRAVEL BASE ((AS PER STATE SPEC. NI04.4 MINIMUM N' FABRIC IV THICK GRAVEL BABE I OR NlN.05 FINE) OVERLAP AS PER STATE SPEC. Im T04.06 OR N]04.05 FINE) 17THICKSAND BORROW ((AS PER W AWN—�--I�- STATE 9PEC. 0M.03A) PUBLIC STREET WITH SIDEWALK DECTION °'sPAcwcFORPOSTS POSTSHALLHAVEA NTS MINIMUM CROSS SECTION -- AREA OF 25 SOUACE INCHES Ir 1/4' RAD IS 1/2° RADUS 6 PRK)R TO PAVING, THE PORTION OF CURBING g. ° -7 TO BE IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT / SHALL %COATED WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT. I T I PAVEMENT 13 18• CLA55 B CQNOLETE L-10�—A 1) CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10' SECTIONS WITH 1/8' JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2) CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SMALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASNTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2- SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK) 3) ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB SMALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD (APPROXIMATELY 28 DAYS) CONCRETE CURB SIMINALK RAMP WITH I A BROOM FINISH SURFACE I 5' WN. B B 24- e . GRASS STRIP CONCRETE CURB DETECTABLE A WARNING SURFACE SINGLE RAMP ON TANGENT, NARROW OR NO GRASS STRIP SIDEWALK RAMP WITH CONCRETE CURB BROOM FINISH SURFACE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE 6A GRASS STRIP SINGLE RAMP ON CORNER RADIUS. NARROW GRASS STRIP BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CURB. SIDEWALK RAMP NTS 4'-0' 1/2• RADIUS TAPER 7' � FINISH GRADE 10"] INSTALL, AT ALL ENDS OF CURB SECTIONS In TYPICAL TAPERED CURB NTS SIDEWALK RAMP b W of MAX. 1/4• REVEAL ua ROADWAY SURFACE Swtion A -A '�OURB AueuARY _ MIN. N IgINM10N0 (IIPKAL ) Seet'on R—R SIDEWALK RAMP WITH DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE r CONCRETE CURB Section C-C NOTE: THE DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE PLATES SMALL BE CAST IRON. WX1Ju�� i it I STEELSTEEL WE4'X2•GALVANIZEO WELDED WIRE NOTES: 1. RAILSAND POSTS SHALL BE PREMIUM NATIVE WHITE CEDAR. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM, ACTUAL FENCE DIMENSIONS TO BE SHOWN ON SHOP DRAWINGS MAY VARY. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY ENGINEER SPLIT RAIL FENCE WITH WIRE MESH N.T.S. C RADIUS I CONCRETE DEPRESSED CURB AT DRIVEWAY SHALL HAVE 1' RADIUS TO EASE TRANSITION FROM STREET TO DRIVE APRON SIDELINE 2' THICK BTLA OUS CONCRETE "� "•" TYPE III APRON OVER 18" MIN. GRASS GRAVEL BA (VAOT SPEC. '704.05 FINE OR E704.06). � f—U" A 25 A DRIVEWAY APRON & CURB CUT NIS CONCRETE TYPICAL STREET CROSS-SECTION NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WIRN THE CRY PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS, THE 2011 VERMONT STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, AND THE APPROVED ENGINEERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED ON THE FACE OF THE CURB WHERE R WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT. 3. EMULSION WILL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE BASE AND FINISH COATS OF PAVEMENT WHEN THE FINISH COURSE IS NOT PLACED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE BASE COURSE PLACEMENT. 4. THE STREET FINISH GRADE SMALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5% 5. WHERE LEDGE EXISTS IT SHALL BE SMATTERED TO A MINIMUM Oi 2'-8• BELOW SIBGRADE. 6. YELLOW OR ORANGE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE BURIED IS- ABOVE ALL GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND T.V. LINES 7. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE UNDERDRAINS, THE FABRIC AND GRAVEL, THE CONTRACTOR SMALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR INSPECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL FURNISH A LOADED DUMP TRUCK FOR TRAVELING ON THE SUBGRADE WHEN THE ENGINEER PERFORMS THE INSPECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL OVER -EXCAVATE UNSUITABLE SOILS AND ADD ADDITIONAL SAND BASE AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER. 8. PBKM TO PLACEMENT OF SAND BORROW OR GRAVEL BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER A GRADATION ANALYSIS FOR EACH MATERIAL SOURCE TO BE USED DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED SPECIFICATION. THIS GRADATION ANALYSIS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MATERIAL TO BE USED. SUBSEQUENT SIMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ON -SITE MATERIAL IN PLACE FOR GRADATION ANALYSIS BY THE ENGINEER. 9. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND SIDEWALK SMALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF ANTI-SPALLING COMPOUND AFTER THE INITIAL CURING PERIOD. 10. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON PUBLIC STREETS SMALL BE DURABLE MARKINGS (3M TAPE). TEMPORARY PAINT MARKINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON BASE COURSE PAVEMENT. LEDGE REMOVAL SPECIFICATIONS ALL LEDGE BLASTING AND REMOVAL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE ROCK, IF ENCOUNTERED. TO THE LINES AND GRADES INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THE ROCK AND BACKFILL WITH ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL. ROCK IN PIPE TRENCHES SMALL BE EXCAVATED SO AS NOT TO BE LESS THAN SIX INCHES FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE DATER IT HAS LAID. ROCK EXCAVATION SMALL MEAN BOULDERS EXCEEDING ONE CUBIC YARD IN VOLUME OR SOLID LEDGE ROCK, WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, REQUIRES ITS REMOVAL DRILLING AND BLASTING, WEDGING. SLEDGING, OR BARRING. NO HARDPAN, SOFT. OR DISINTIGRATED ROCK WHICH CAN BE REMOVED WITH A PICK; LOOSE. SHAKEN, OR PREVIOUSLY BUSTED ROCK OR BROKEN STONE SMALLER THAN ONE CUBIC YARD IN ROCKFILLING OR ELSEWHERE; AND NO ROCKS EXTERIOR TO THE MAXIMUM LIMITS OF EXCAVATIONS BY THE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER WHICH MAY FALL INTO THE TRENCH OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS, WILL BE MEASURED OR ALLOWED AS ROCK EXCAVATION. IN ROCK EXCAVATION. IT IS ESPECIALLY REQUIRED THAT BLASTING SMALL BE CONDUCTED WITH ALL POSSIBLE CARE SO AS TO AVOID INJURY TO PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT ROCK SHALL BE WELL COVERED WITH EFFECTIVE APPLIANCES; THAT SUFFICIENT WARNING SHALL BE GIVEN TO ALL PERSONS IN THE VICINITY OF WORK BEFORE BLASTING; THAT CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID INJURY TO WATER PIPES, GAS PIPES, SEWERS, DRAINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES; AND THAT CAPS OR OTHER PRIMERS SMALL NOT BE KEPT IN THE SAME PLACE WHERE DYNAMITE OR DIME R EXPLOSIVES ARE STORED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBSERVE ALL LAWS AND ORDINANCES RELATING TO STORAGE AND HANDLING OF EXPLOSIVES. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1) UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM BEST AVAILABLE SOURCES AND MAY OR MAY NOT BE EITHER ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR SMALL VERIFY NEW TAP LOCATIONS AND SHALL CONNECT ALL UTILITIES TO NEAREST SOURCE THROUGH COORDINATION WITH UTILITY OWNER. 2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING VEGETATION, PAVEMENT. AND STRUCTURES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK UNLESS NOTED ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR SMALL REMOVE ALL TRASH FROM SITE UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. AM SURFACES, LINES OR STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SMALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT IN WHICH THEY WERE FOUND IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION. 3) SEE OTHER DETAIL SHEETS OF THESE PUNS FOR ADDITKXAL DETAILS. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4) ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIT X THE 2011 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS SPECIFICATIONS AND THESE PLANS. 5) A MINIMUM OF ONE-WAY TRAFFIC SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. CONTINUOUS TWO-WAY TRAFFIC WILL BE REQUIRED AT NIGM. PEAK -HOURS, AND WHENEVER POSSIBLE DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER, MUNICIPALITY OR ENGINEER. A UNIFORMED TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER SHALL DIRECT TRAFFIC DURING PEAK HOURS. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHALL BE ERECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND TOWN STANDARDS. 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AT HIS OR HER OWN EXPENSE FOR ENSURING THAT THE DUST CREATED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CREATE A NUISANCE OR SAFETY HAZARD. WHERE AND WHEN DEEMED NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REWIRED TO WET SECTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH WATER, APPLY CALCIUM CHLORIDE, OR SWEEP THE ROADWAY WITH A POWER BROOM FOR DUST CONTROL. 7) THE CONTRACTOR SMALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING ANY WORK, CUTTING PAVEMENT, BEGINNING THE INSTALLATION OF ANY UTILITIES, BRINGING IN ANYNEW GRAVEL OR STONE FOR THE NEW WE. PAVING, ALL TESTING, AND FINAL INSPECTION, IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS. 8) PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, ALL MATERIALS SMALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY. 9) ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6 INCH LIFTS AND THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO 95X OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-99 STANDARD PROCTOR. AND SHALL BE TESTED AT 500' INTERVALS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10)BACKFILL UNDER PIPES IN FILL AREAS SMALL BE COMPACTED TO 95X OF MAXIMUM DENSITY OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. THE PIPES SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED OVER ADEQUATELY COMPACTED SOILS. 11)THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SMALL BE INSPECTED, MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN PAVED OR GRASSED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF AM ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTATION. 12)CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND CERTIFICATION IS OFTEN REQUIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS DETAILED ON THESE PUNS BE OBSERVED BY LAMOUREUX k DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. (LkD) TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARE OVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. LkD WANES AM AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LABILITY FOR PROBLEMS THAT MAY ANISE FROM: FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE DESIGN INTENT TMAT THEY CONVEY. ANY CHANGES MADE IN THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVMENTS WITHOUT LBD'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT. AND/OR FAILURE TO SCHEDULE OBSERVATION OF THE WORK AND TESTING PROGRESS. 13)THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT OR LOT CURB CURS AND PIPE SERVICES WITH THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. 14)ALL SLOPES, DITCHES AND DISTURBED AREAS SMALL BE GRADED SMOOTH. CLEAN AND ----- 11 FREE OF POCKETS WITH SUFFICIENT SLOPE TO ENSURE DRAINAGE. 19 MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE TO OVERHANGINGBRANCHES. WIRES. F OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. �--OOLDER MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BOTH SIDES TO TREES, BRAACHES, POLES, WALLS, FENCES, HYDRANTS, SIGNS. OR SIGN OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS. 21- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1' TYPE N WEARING COURSE 1 III TYPE II BASE COURSE g Y-0RIGINALGROUND 10 1' —S•0.112 SHOULDER _ 3 1 v _ _ 1 1TYPICAL I ' '< Ir DENSE GRAJMD CRUSHED GRAVEL �—I DENIEO GRASS PER VAOT SPEC. ]OA.OS TYPICAL 1' SHOULDER: 2' OF TOPSOIL AND PLANT DENSE GRASS (BOTH SIDES) MIRMI B00X FABRIC OR NOTE: FINE CRUSHED GRAVEL HAVING A DEPTH OF UP TO I' MAY BE USED APPROVED EQUAL FOR FINE GRADING ON TOP OF THE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE CROSS COUNTRY PAVED PATH CROSS SECTION NTS Crm.. r 'taaa �c'SY.Y.w^YT'.: c'• C � /iRAtl 4/-I. f", t'a�,. N`I.^ ^ • {I ,y p 11�, ylI EE .j ,Y.r VA, in-1 <.Ns. 'CTL,. .. NR, G.W1!AC LR iYYf,t AMY3K•.I.L.L1 II:,�' z I t W 1 ..I,711 5. (YA'g- "•^�"•" ' SHELF„F0q WO MS sPM&AFM IL PI.F MIATPLF YAI NOX SUPPOfli, MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAIL RTAWDAAD ... (SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SUPPORT) SEE VTRANS STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DETAIL J-3 FOR MAILBOX INSTALLATION ARMHOLE FRAME k — COVLR MEN SEHTTE PRE -CAST OR POURED IN -PLACE 3500 PSI CONCRETE NOTE: OR OSS-COUNTRY RAME MHOE Fk COKR GAFLULABELED WIN BASE ERY' ST SH RISER BETWEEN C.B. TOP AND BOTTOM OF CAST IRON AWER LINES RIMS $H NEENAH RUICBAROH COURSE PAVEMENT FRAME. MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE B INCHES. (BRICKS BE A YINYUY M' 6' ABOVE LC26e OR COJH. fN14H GRILC SHALL N01 E USED. ) FINISH MAX. NO PAROIG OF WIERDII FILL GAP WITH GROUT FNSN GRADE w WORK OR .OIR'S ADA COIMPLMTCFRAME ! 1H MORTAR SHALL RE ALLOED LROUT FRAME RER TE. USE CASCADE NEW CURB SHALL EST S TOP GRATE WHERE ROPE > 5% "EIGHT TO POSER r OF CURB AS EWIRED�ST GROUT RIME AOJINST NM NM I NICE THERE IS NO CURB, TOPSOIL AM MASS 10 PoSR ADJUS CdtlE`lE PoSR$ CONCRETE POSERS /, DN FARRICND USE 4 LANGE SHNLFRAME fIN15N MAX �O BTHE THE COMPLETELY ae OEIWIC A5.T.M. C476 — ENVELOPE THE STOE UNDERIMM TENCH —M. I— 1� WAl E%RRIfR OF COIQETE PREGAST REwfORMD CWc YANIHOLE HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON ADA COMPLIANT OR THE SIOESBOTTpA.TOR AND ENDS �lr PIi[CAST EIMfORCED MM MI (2) CG15 M COE AND RISER J,_0. FRAME !GRATE GROUT FRAME TO CONCRETE CMG yAxlNa[ CONE AND PoSR -TIRPROOF SEALANT S-D• COPOLYMER THE FRAME OPENING SHALL MATCH fIN15n GRADE OVERHANG. THE CATCH BASIN TOPJF��: FABRIC ENVELOPE TYPICAL H AT r aC. EACH WAY P YPRWWUENE 2 COPOLYMER PLASTIC FILINGSWITH STEEL 1/2R INFOR ,, GROUL FRAME i0 RISERGRAd T UD OLEAR S MINBAUY 6• NIGHER J THAN Ot AST MINIM M PLAN. snC mNNWMII N eO STEEL GREWH, tY O.c M E EOUA- IYTOORC DOUBLE LATER M ALL BACKFXL 1HOflWOILY�V ADJJST RIM WI1H COMPACTED IN 6' LIFTS/1 ESMadORCEYE.1 •UDN A 6 - a239/1 W.W.E. 6• U.DGASKEI RTUMASTC FLE%IDLE AlAlL1H CONCRETE RISERS Al 6. O.C. EACH w AY IN ACCOID.WCEAALNT A.S.T.M. C-113 AND r�{ ASIM C-30I ON ROPE II ' 1 PROVIDE WATERTIGHT RUBBERBUM FOR ALL STORY PIPESTELOEO SAME ELEVATIONBOOT STEEL MRE FABRIC SHALL BE USEO AROUND Hl CAST IN PLACE RUBBER GASKET 6• OR LARGER IN pNEERWIELDED FABRIC UNDEMRNN INSALL SIEEt WIRE FABRC GRANIAN BAIXfLL FMl BACKFILL STORM SEWER RESTHOROUGHLY 6 - a139/1 W.W.F. STDARD3% COMPACTEDL N 6' LIFTS A.S.T.. C,]B PRECASVARUMSE 6 - 0.239/4 W.W.F. CONCRETE STRUCTUR/5 AT 6• QC. EACH wAr PRECAST CONOIET GAR Aaz STANDARD t2• SHEv AND wvCaf RNAHII T FOR I 1ERTNNI rx LE Ws ! 1 FT.) gpyOE WATERTIGHT LppM6 RUBBER BODY FOR ALL (12.3 WI A FT.) UNDISTURBED SOIL CMST. (M. ALL rpm 2-FINS IN -)CONCRETE (1,2.3 $TINY RPES 6' a A.S.T.M C176 PRECAST STRUCTURE .: � A AT 6' O.C. EACH WAY ,3/1•NCRUSHED 2�• 6' CHANNEL EXTEND BEDDING 10 ORAN.AM BAdFu FOR VARIIZE or ' ! LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT STORE BEDDING LIMITS OF EXCAVATION slRucTUREs VARY SEC iDM.M 0 3' P11M9 LING" 0/J MAIL 12, 6' S ICNT 1 YE e, / 6' EXTEND BEDDING 10 LEDGE PAYMENT LAIITS a E%CAVATOR NOTE: CATCH BASINS MAY BE LARGER THAN SHOWN OR THIS DETAIL lr LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT / 1Y LEDG 3/P CRUSHED STONE BEDDING WITH MULTIPLE OR LARGER DIAMETER PIPES IN ORE S%CTNE. miNPREGsoEn eY0`islMiL Y THIC/• / BP �\// CWCCASEIE BASE NFL Y / Br /\�/ PRECAST CATCHBASIN (YARD) PRECAST CATCH BASIN HEXNT. ,/e• TO ,/�. „EIG„T. ,/4' aDSHED STONE SEoaNG 0i °Mac CRUSHED SREH° � �F • r ac. VIRANs —C.TD..o3e NTS [INN Do NOT us ENEB EAaN SAY Is DOOR NO LNG TD EXTEND BEDDING TO IT,Q EXCAVATION UMI19 CF EXCAVATION TYPICAL PRECAST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TYPICAL PRECAST STORM MANHOLE NTS Nit USE PVC PPE OR PRESSURE LOCATED Y X 1' TO PARK SANITARY & STORM SPECIFICATIONS LOCATOR AND DEPTH a SERVICE CONNECTOR. 1 I EXTEND FROM PLUG TO 2 ABOVE FINAL WADE 1) SANITARY D STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL 8E OF THE E SZE AINK INDICATED OR THE S PLANPVC PIPE SHALL BE SOFT 35 CONORYINO TO ASIM Y-d MWINGE 7 / 0-3031, ASLY 0-321]. AND ASIM F-,T). CORRUGATED WTAL PIPE SHALL MARKS MYA PROPERTY LINE OR CASEMENT W CONFORM TO MSHTO Y-190 FOR ACCOP RED AASHTO M-246 TYPE B FOR POLYMERIC COATED STEEL PIE. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PRE SHALL J PROVIDE COVER YAKKED BOUNDARY CONFORM TO AASHTO M291. TYPE S (SMOOTH LINED). I "SEWER. OR "STORM. 6' MINIMUM $ERNCE 2) ALL NEW GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE LEAN TESTED BY SOR 33 PW CONNECTOR A LOW PRESSUE AR TEST AND DEFLECTOR TESTED. THE LOW FINISHED GRADE PAVEMENT OR GRASS ME SHALLL RUN UN P SEWER SEAERPENdOULAR PLUG TEMPORARY PRESSURE AR TEST WILL BE USED TO SIMULATE INFILTRATION OR PRESSURE INTO OR OUT OF ALL GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS ALL I M THE MAIN TO AT LEAST TESTIG W BE DUCTED UNDER WE V OF TIC NC CCORDSUE j THE STREET LINE ENGI OLIR THE G SHALL ALLOWED YE IN ASTENGINEER. AIR TESTING SHALL AL PERFORMED OR A ACCORDANCE WITH DROP PROVIDE WATERTIGHT FIT 5.5 PSI TO 2.5 PSI SHALL BE 1.2 MINUTES ER 100 FEET OF 5-1/1' DIAMETER X 36• CAP e• YWI:R. AFTER ME FINAL BACKFXL HAS BEEN N RACE AT I I TALL VALVE BOX TOP LEAST N DAYS, THE DEFLECTION TEST MAY BE EEORMED. NO PPE SHALL EXCEED RECTOR OR FIVE ERCENT (5IWA IF I I I WIN L TOP RANGE. INSTALL 3ST INSTALL BOX FLUSH WITHSTONE \ ` PAYMENT O T IS L. I IT DEFLECTOR TEST n RUN USING A IEIGID BAIL OR Y I N SCRUSHEDUPPORT AD UN191 GRADE SUPPORT FOR VALVE \LIMIT � LINT HE .. SHALL R Of HAUL A DIAMETER ECUAL TO 95i OF RM INSIDE DIAMETER OF ME RE. WE TEST SHALL E EEORMEO WITHOUT AS NOTED BOX TOP MECHANICAL. PULLING DEVICES ALL MANHOLE D RELINE MATERIALS MANHOLE CHANNEL W PLANS 2 is YN°CM 40E 1/ER STATE SIDAROSS AND ITSTING SHALL BE IN WITH CITY D PLANS. NTS �6. , O \V I FOR /FTS—IARFOR SEWER OR T FOR WISERDRNN PIPE UNLESS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ND THESE ]) ALL SANITARY SEWER MNNOLES SHALL BE TESTED PRIOR TO LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT UNDERMAIN CARRIER RE OR SMIIARY CWSTRUCTIW OF THE INVERT BY THE VACUUM TEST METHOD DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. FOR MANHOLES SEWER MAIN SEE SEVER TRENCH DETAIL UP TO 10' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME FOR A VACUUM DROP FOR SEV'LR MIJN 'WO SCONCE FROM 10' TO 9' OF MERCURY SHALL BE 2 MINUTES FOR MANHOLES OM _ DO NOl CONNECT UNOERDRAN TO SANITARY MAIN BEDDING DETAILS THAN I0' DEEP THE MINIMUM ALLOWED TIME SHALL BE f—FLOW SENLR NDEATER 2.HN SCWDS SANITARY SEWER OR UNDERDRAIN C'LEANOUT DETAIL (STORM & SEWER) SERVICE CONNECTION NTS NIS FINISH GRADE PLAN VIEW FINISH GRADE NTS UNDISTURBED S(IIL WATER MAIN BAC%FILL WITH APPROVED PROFILE VIEW REVISIONS EXCA—D MATERIAL of THOROUGHLY COMPACTED UNDISTURBED soE NTS IN. PINS WTI' IA." REMSIONS SHOULD E O IN 6' LOTS \ BACKITL NTH WPROVED EXCAVATED MATERIAL it IF THE SANITARY SEWER RE IS LOCATED MOVE THE WATER PIE, ME SEWER MILT BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN KLOW: PIPE SHEETS THE OOs O TRENCHES nl TNORd1ONLY COMPACTED $ JOINTS OR EACH SIDE ai THE WATER MAIN 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT 1 FT. MR MORE N DEPTH ENTERED BY EPSONCL y SHALL SE SHEETED OR M COVER IS LL55 MN S 1/S, TES HN�,� IN 5' LIFTS SHALL E CONCRETE ENCASED SEE PLAN WNI�YM SEWER: 510MININ. ,A,) 0 PRELIMINARY s FINAL ROPED TO ME MOLE ------ ------ FOR BURIN OAR PE IN NO CASE SHAU. WE RE IN SIDES OF TRENCHES n 1 FT. OR MOLE IN OEPTN STORM OR SANITARY SEVER RE O 0 RECORD DRAWING OF REPOSE 12• I A.L� EROMN OF —M ENTEED BY PERSONNEL = IF COVER IS US THAN S 1/2'. SHALL BE SHEETED M XI PLACE 1' THMN INSULATED 9 1B• MIN. DFO} n0. APPROVED ROCK FEE BACKFILL IN("GHLI (b• Is ours. DIAMETER (W PIE) SLOPE TO WE ANGLE ---- BOARD. WNIW R9ATAINE -- - ----- OF REPOSE FOR BURIAL OVER PIE. 10' MIN. - -� - WRIER MAIN SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 Survey CDYPAClEO IM 6' 6• STOLES --a-- 12 D rs OUT90E C STORM OR SAN1TARr SEWER PIPE 1e' um. A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LkD LUFTSARGER T DARNER THAN 1 1/Y DIAMETER) FEE SACKS 6. aMETER OF PIPE) __-- SPEAR STREET& VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON ae3R \ 1v THE CONS KEEPII $MALL NO _ALL TREI`ESfREEPWE COMPACTED IN STONES LA N r LIFTS (NO STONES LARGER iNM 1 1/2• DIAMETER) O STORM (N SANITARY SEWER PIE / ABR drown u 6 -TER MISHED - \ --- 10' YIN. [I` SANITARY SANER PIPE IS LOCATED ABR 3/1' CRUSHED STORE UNTIL ALL WORN IS AND READY FOR BAC%fLLwG THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT SINGLE 2 NOMINAL ABOVE THE WATER PIPE, THE SEWER PIPE DETAILS & SPECIFI ATI N LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT CEb_EALLNT TIMES KEEP THE TRENCHES C ENTIRELY FREE OF WATER UNTIL ALL WORK IS FINISHED LENGTH OF WATER PIE JOINTS OR EACH ODE OF THE WATER F MAIN SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED checked DJC Dig FEET 3/9' OR STORE D READY FOR BAWRLLINC SEWER &STORM date UNDISTURBED SOIL RE 06-06-16 LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT stole TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER TRENCH UNDISTURBED SOL Dig FEET TYPICAL STORM SEWER &DRAIN TRENCH WATER /SEWER PiPF. CROSSING LANOUMEUX&UI('.NINS(1N E',1M.BmE "ET"`ef`''"` 14 YUJx AS NOTED NIS NTS N75 i- d 802- tiNNLVT05432 T.I: R02-PTK4,50 11 WATER DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS 1.1 GENERAL: CASE IRON COKR YMNED WATER M;s item shall consist al the lob«, equipment, and molerlal rpuhed im me omplale construction of the wate,ma;ne and No ices which shill include ncowtion, boCkfilling, pipe, Wom, five, hydrants, dbon, reducHs, and all other appurtenances y flu complete eotwmoin system a indicated on the accepted maeings. All materials and installations Moll be opprowd by the local municipal eater authority. 1.2 WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIALS: DUCTILE IRON PIPE Pipe Mail be a minimum diameter at eight hMss (B') Old conlorm to currant AWWA C600 and ANSI Specification A21.51. Psi joint pipe Mail be minimum thickness Clow 52. Pipe Mail be cement mwlw-lined an the inside In ace«dance Win AWRA C151.51 or ANSI Specifkolfan A21.4 ezcpf that the cement-INInq thickness Mal not M less than three -sixteenths him (3/16'). A plus la emIce of ans-dghthe Inch (1/8') rRl be permitted. 1.3 FITTINGS. Ductile Iran fillings Mall be cement lined, haw 350 pound wmking pressure, Ono be in m ccdonce with AWWA C-110/ANSI A2110 and AWWA C152/ANSI 21.53 for compact fittings. Mechanical joint nuts and bolls Mail be high strength, low alloy steel per ANSI A- 21.11 . Ductile iron Rlt ing. larger than feel. inches (12-) .If haw a standard body length equal to Close 250 cast Iran fittings. Cast Won den 250 RllInge lull be allowed in Ilea of da<hIs iron filling. insizes larger than loud. Inches (I2'). Yegaug retohw pond ar On opprowd pod Mail ale ussd an all wlkol bend Old as Mown an the plans. 1.4 GATE VALVE RESILIENT SEAT: Got. wlw shall be AWWA C 509 Standard Oct. VO1- with mechanicd 'pints of sizes as req.ked an the IN— AN """ Mall be of IOAt w daclle iron Dndy, Po'M braes ants, non -rising elan, hsid ease. double disk c O.tructian with '0' Ring Slsm Seals. All valves to be equipped eilh a wlw box IN a minimum OI 5.5• 1 cow malaria. The gate val.s shall open left and be designed far a e«king pressure of 200 psi. Each calNi shall ha" maw'. name, pressure rating, and year In which manufactured oat on the bedy. Prier to shipment from the factory, each wlw elan be tested by hydrntotic prn eW.1 to twice the specified emking pressure. 8u1ivd wl"s Moll be Installed ,Rh ofewlw bo.. 1.5 VALVE BOXES: Cast Wan three-piece did-lypn; fen old on -fourths Inch (5 1/A') "Oft; six fact (6') I— depth. Cast Wan cow marked 'WATER' Old Indicating direction of opening. 1.6 FIRE HYDRANTS - All hydrants a e to be 3-way, 5' minimum diameter old limited to the following makes: Walwous Pacer, Muellw Super Centurion or Kennedy Guardian K-81D, and Mall conform with AWWA C502. MOIn Val. Opening: S 1/e inches Nozzle Amangeman;: Two 2 1/2 Inch loss nozzles NST threads. One A 1/2 inch pumper nozzle NST threads. Inlet Connection: 6 Inch mechanical joint. MEGA -LUG and thrust block Operating Nut: Standard 1 1/2' pentagon Direction of Opening: CountwdMein CdN: Enemded hydrant red body, top cal « ale determined by Town. Depth of Bury: Hymant shall be Installed to the mwufacturs,. instructions with nozzles about 18' abo" finish grad. 1.1 HYDRANT BRANCHES Hydrwt os.emblln Mal consist of a six him jV) meMwka joint gat. cal" conforming to AWWA C-509; a length of It. Inch (6) Cln a52 ductile Wan pipe with smart -lining; and the Me hydrant. MEGA -LUG relolner glands o, ppro ed equal Moll be .- The hyMOnt Mall ho,le at least fifteen (15') between the bottom of the steamer cap old the ground. 1.8 CONSTRUCTION METHODS A INSPECTION AND TESTING All pipe and fittings Mail be inspected and tested In accordance with the ulxturw's pedilieotinn. cad the oI.-Illioned AWWA Speclfko0ons, Me =rffm Mail furnish for ppro Cwtif Ilion hen the pipe -.I- .,m that all (sets ha" been awlormed Wth sstisfocimY re.ulis, Pipe Mdl not a. installed wfthout the Engineer's m WON, Authority• approval. B. INSTALLATION Pipes, fillings. and occessarin Mall be carefully handled to awia damage. Prior la lne date of acceptance of the project rork by the Dell, the Contractor Mall ,place any new pipe or m IIe .y found to De aefealin of any time. Including of e, Inethllatiw. of n epenn to the Gen.. All Inlalletian and testing Mal be awe in aacmdanc. rllh AWWA Standard C-600 and ANSI Spnilkoliw A21.11. NI pipes shoeing crack. Mall be rejected. If cracks occur k, the pipe, the Contractor may, at his P. expense and with the pprowl of the Engineer, cut off the cracked porlkns at a poIn1 at least lwelw inches (12') from the AZT. limit. of the crock and uss the sound partial of the pipe. All pipes and fillhq. Mill as clewed of al foreign moll« era dembi prim to instalotian and shill as, kept dean anu the time of acceptann by the Oeow. At dI limn, Men the pipe loving is not actually In m.7e.s, the pn end of the C,M Mail be dosed by tempwwy ntwtight dugs or by other d,maWzd mews, If .at I. in the VMM Men .ark 1. resumed. In. plug .hall not be remand until ill Clangs, of eIt.I wtwing the pipe nos passed. Me pipe Mail be installed in trnMn and at the Iine one groan Man on the Contract Draeing.. My deflective )Dints Mall be Within the I'imlto peciff" by the manufacturer. All piping and appurtenances connected to the " iPmanI Mall be .uPpart ed ac tool no stroin ell be imposed on the equipment. 11 the pu;pm.nl mwulaclurw'e spacifkalfon include that piping Ind, a rR not to ae transferred, the Cwlraclw wall submit cwlific. ian of Iomplionce. Concrete thrust blacks shall be installed an an plugs, tees, and bends d9ecthg 11 1/4 degrees or more Care Mdl be take to wsure that concrete ele not Corns I. wtacl with nangn, Pill., or povals, Th. required or of thrust blacks me indicated on he plan. « Mail be as appred by the Engineer. Whenew, sewers mess now eatwm.;ns. the eutermoin Mal be laid at such an in"tian that the bottom of the .atwmoin Is at least 18 Inches above the top of the This wlicd separation Mall be mohlohed for that portion of the eotwmoin located .illin ten Issf (10•) narismlaly OI any ...w it morn. Thera Mail be no physical cwnedtiw between the distribution system and any pipe, Pumps. hydrants, m tanks Mil we supplied or may be supplied eith a wolw That i0. or may ale, contaminated.In ;nlanros Mme the u of different types of pipe rea.k. 'Pining, the Contractor MOII furnish and instal oil nice -my odaptws. All lranMing safety standards Mall be h canformoncn with all aPPIICQbI0 Slot* Ond Federal Guidelines cad as specified an the Plans. The Contractor Mall, al all limee, keep the irMMn entirely free of .ale unit ill emk is fin'Mnl and ready for boclHdling. Alter the wbuzz pp.lhe. how been installed, the irMchn and (thin areas to be filled Mall be backMlea to eubgred elth, Mlew Possible, material .--t d from the IrMM. No II-knfing .ill be once. antl any concrete mmus ry has set sufficiently. as determined by the Engine. All material for backGling Mal be free of roots, slumps, and host. MotwkXs used far bOckMing Iranchn XhM be free of stone. r ,gh,nq o.r 30 Paulo. No stann ring ow a anal a -hill Nchwe (1 1/2') n the langeet EimM.bn Moll be plied ei1hIn anal foolDI the pipeline being backOlad. Backfill tar oil pipNNe, Moll be placed in nch (8') Icy— each layer being thoroughly compacted to not less than 95 percent of ma.lmum my density as determined by the AASHTO-T-99 Standard Proctor. Particular precautions 0011 be lakan in the placement and compaction of the backfll material In maer not to damage the pipe Or structure. The backfill Mal be drought up a"nly. All eOlWmaine .hall be .stalled w;ln a minimum Io.r depth of a;. (6'). Surplus anted matwiole not used far backltl Man be disposed .I in satisfactory to the Engln.w. All surplus material or pan Mall be removed promptlynw and 11p:L' of so as not to be objectionable to Mauves or to the 9WWN public. Val. boxn m. to be installed an all buried wines. The born Mail be cast Won Wth o minimum fiw and dne-fourths Inch (5 1/4') diameter and long enough to extend from the cal. to !,;shed grade. The boxn shall ancloss the operating nut and stuffing box of the wlw. Vol" bozos Moll not transfer loads into the WA- Cows shall be close lilting and dirt -tight .;Ih the lop of the caw IIuM with the lop of the box rim, Covers Moll ba marked 'Water' with M e inditoling the direction of Waning. Val" boxn shall be three piece Mp-lype.ro The contractor Mal provide a stable, temporary PVC marker opprowd by the (6 b of all gale wins, curb staps, and at the end of -1-finesto a point six inches (8-) oo. MIM grade. The marks, Mall be sealed securely into the ground. C. FIELD TESTING Except as othm.iss directed. ill paiii.. was be tested. Ppsimn laic in ex 13on « bedded In concrete Mail be tested prim to backnlhg or the placing of concrete, old any apossd piping Mail be tested prior to field pointing. Me Contractor Mall furnish all gouges, testing plugs, cops, and all other nec ssory equipment and labor to perform leakage and pressure test Inlian. of a opprowd length. Each calved section « o manmum of we thousand I= 0.000') of the pipe Moll be tested. All eotw required for letting Mall be "face. All testing shall be conductetl in the presence of the Engineer. Far the pressure test, the Contract« Mall deMop and maintain 200 pound per square Inch for Iwo hours. Failure to had the designated pressure far the lea -hour period constitutes O foBure of the section tested. The Inkoge test shall be performed concurrently MIN the pressure test. During the lest, the Contractor Mall m e the quantity W water required to maintain the lest pressure. Leakage Mall not exceed the quantity given by. SD L 1/QODO whore: L LeakageI In 9d ans/hour, S . Len th of i dine tested 9 PP D Diarnalw of pipe in inches P Awoge lest pressure in psi All testing shall be conducted in accordance with AWWA C-600 latest revision. Should any section of the pipe fag either the pressure m leakage tests, the Contractor Mall do ewything necessary to locate and repair m real... the dfecliw pipe, fillings, Or Palls at no npense to the Owner. D. DISINFECTION: ChiwinotiM of the walwmoin Mal be conducted only after the anon has been flushed and a dear stream is Obtained as determined by the Engineer. Me Canty -tar Ma11 fumiM all lob«. saup..nl. mItwW . Old fads nnnnry to as;nfect lM pipe and appurtenances, In «.«dance with the AMA Standard for Disinfecting Wotwmains, C-651, with the reception of the tablet method. Me method of disinfection shill be by the continuous feed method unless othwrise approved by the Engines. Alter filling, OuMhg, and the addition of chlorine solution, the free chlorine con enlrotion sithkl the pipe Mall pre at feat 25 mgA. The chi«holed water Mall re ncihe main far o pwiod of at feat 2e nours. At the end of this period, the treated eOlw in all portions of the main Mail not hen a residual of ten than 10 mg.A of free chlorine. All aishfeclion shall be performed undr the supwW.lon of the Engines. The disinfection process Mal be deemed acceptable only after (2) rpin of voter from the flushed, dl.inleded main taken by the Engineer and tested opprowd laboratory Mow no aVdMc, of b.ctwiologicai conlpmination. Dieininlian .hall .-form to the latest AMA C-651 revision. The Pipeline old appurtenances shall M moinlohed In an .-Intaminaled cwdltlw until final acceptance. Disinfection Mail be repealed Men and Mere r",W d at no -penes to the Owner until anal acnptance by the Oenw. E. FROST PROTECTION OF SHALLOW WATERLINES WolerlInn Wth Ins than six fort (6') of cow ow the crown, « Mwe hdkalso an the plan% Mal be protected Not firming by h.tdl.tiw of four Inch (f) thick SIWof- SM insulation Meet. wIth . total wk1th of four feet (e') or take the pipe diameter, M;Mew b grwlw. Me sheets Mall be placed s inches (6') Obo. the c en a1 them after compaction o1 the C. inch (6') lift WImmediolely Ica" the c,rR Care Moll bete wcised by the Cwlraclor l during bockfill and wnpxlbn ow the styrofoam Meets to prevent damage to the Meets. Styrofoam SM Meets Mall meet the comprnsi" At ... glh rNzAkements of ASTM D1621-73 and Mall ba of manufactured by Dow Chemical Company, Mialwd, Michigan, ar puiwlenl. In no cove shall the waterlines no" less than four feet (1•) of cow ow the top of the pipe. MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (IN SQUARE FEET) ®m Cfll��ll����lAlm 3500 PSI "GO PSI CONCRETE CONCREh END AREA BEARING END AREA f•o A" ST BEARING J UNDISTURBED AGAINST SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL TYPICAL"I'EES-DEADENDS-CAPS TYPICAL BENDS NOTE: PLACE a mil POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK THRUST BLOCK END AREA NTS "' ONTO LOT ALL DOMESTIC SERVICES AND DOILESRC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MAT ME CONNECTED TO ME PUBIC WATER SYSTEM SHKCC L BE PROTECTED ACCORDING TO THEM DECREE OF HAZARD, WTIH A d CONTRACTOR'S LIMIT BACKFLOW PREKNTION ASSEMBLY, MO WITH AN APPROPRIATE MERMAL EXPMSON SYSTEM. of GROUND ADJUSTABLE TARO PIECE CAST IRON VALK BOX TO FN191 \\� \ WAGE BACd1LL WM EXTENSION TYPE Q1PB BOX NM REM IMIERIAL PENTAGON NUt CAP (TARO IgLE TMMLA� R / CAM NOT ACCEPTABLE) PROVIDE PVC AIMNER RESILIENT SEAT 3/4' CRUSHED STONE SHALL EXTEND \ AT IERMNATCH GATE "I ABOSE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX /\� a• INN. j WAT R MAW Y E PROVIDE HORIZONTAL STAINLESS STEEL ROD GOOSE NEOI / COPPER PIPING SHALL. BE I MJ WTH MEGA -LUG RETAINER r� / Ir I \� 1 rCORTINUWS FROM THE BALL TYPE CIxiBSTOP .I.i QMDS OR APPROKD EWAL 3/n' TYPE 'If COPPERWATER AS SHOFM DCEPAYMENTNNN3/e' SER µOR u [\\� BALL VALKIYPE e' X B' X IV SGLID CONCRETE SLOGN 4DETAIL BRAONALD OR CAMBRN)OE LBRAS) THE WATER $FR $HALL RUN CGINPE59 PAYMENT LINT \ � FR TOAT LEAST EPST lIT ARAM TO Al LEAST ME STREET LeE. WATER PRE59111E LEST SHALL/ VIA R S SHALLEDCE BE 10 MIS PONT. SEE WATER TRENCR No.. TYPICAL BEDDING TS 1. TEFLON MREM SEALANT SHALL BE USED ON ALL CORPORATION STOPS PRIOR TO INSERTION. A SPIRAL WRAP COMPLETELY OOKRING ME MREM AREA WTN TWU WRAPS B. PIPE DOPE OR OTHER LIMID NKAD SEALMTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE 2. CONPMAnON STOPS SMALL NOT K RACED LEA MAN 12' APART ALONG PIPE. WATER SERVICE DETAIL NTS MAIA CI1g/C153 CONKIANT DIICT. IRON TAPPING SLEEK NTN . ENDS NTH END AND .. GASKETS PER CWU SPECIFICATIONS - AD STABLE CAST IRON VALVE BOX TO FINISH GRADE NTH COVER MARKED WATER TAPPING VALVE CWFORMNG TO AWwA C-50s, COUNTER CLONce. OPENING NTH A WORKM PRES"E OF 150 PSI. PER WATER DEPARTMENT SKOMAYONS 3/e- CRUSHED STOP STALL EXTEND ABOVE BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX S/., ONRORATKN N FIRST ... OF PIPE FOR TESTING AND CHLORNATION MEG-LUG RETAINER OR MPROKD EQUAL CRUSHED STONE 12- OEPM NOTES 1. WET TAPS SHALL BE PERFORMED OILY BY FMLIS APPROVED BY THE WATER DEPARTMENT. A CI RRRNT CERTIFICATE OF RNWANCE N ACWRDNILL WM WATER DEPARTMENT REOUNKNINM SMALL ALSO BE FRONDED, 2. TAPS TAPS SHALL BE A LIeeWM OF THREE PIPE DIAMETERS AWAY FROM IN TH M MY MINT E Eedme, PIPE TO W 1w za. 3. AFTER FINAL TICHTENNG AND MSTWG, ALL BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL BE BRUSH COATED WITH BITUNASTK: COLD APPLIED MATERIAL TD THOROUGHLY MVM ALL EXPOSED Stud'- OF ME NUTS AND BOLTS. TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE UNNVED AREAS 1 PAKD AREAS THICKNESS OF NEW INWNNI AT TRENCH SHALL MATCH ENSTNG TNOXNESS AT A MINIMUM, PAVEMENT LIFTS SHALL _"" OF 2 1/2' TYPE a BAWE MDT 1/2' TYPE IE WINING COURSE PAKMENT. TWCtNESS OF EXISTING SUBBASE OR N.. OF la' DENSE GRADED CRASHED 9YOE (VMANS SPEC. MN..) DN. WADE U.InTNtBED SOL "GO, WM APPIIOKD TB' YK EXCAVAIFA YATDTAL THOLDIIOLY CCPACMD N a' UFTS 8 I IDES O TRENCHES DEFT A FT. D MORE IN DEEM u ENTEIREB BY SHEETED SHALM SLOP BE NE ARGUE OF RED TO E TIRE MGE OF REPOSE SAND BORROW (VFRMS SPEC 703.03) FOR D.I. RK. ITTNEROH- IS WET, 31W CRUSHED STONE BEDDING SHALL BE USED. UNDISTURBED SOIL 6, YD PRNN TO PA-G. .1 EXSMIG PAVEMENT - UM OF I FT OVER EXISTING SUnASE. OEM AND CCAT EDOE OF EXISTING PAKMENT NM EMULSION PRIM TO PLACEMENT OF AEMING COURSE PAVEMENT, GnND EXISTING PAKMENT SACK A MINMed OF I FT TO A DEPTH OF I l/Y TO STAGGER MINTS IN TRENCH PAVEMENI PATCH. UNDISTURBED SOL / BOLTED HYDRANT TEE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK SEE THRUST BLOCK SCHEDULE 1 SEE WATER TRENCH J - 3/4- CRUSHED STONE DETNL FOR PIPE AND MIL tY DEPTH 9OIAN' PEOINEYENIS NoTM. 1 VKEES 9MNE BE MANUI`AC1URED TO MEET ALL REOUMEWElin OF A~ C!KXL CURRENT EDITION. VALKS IWELK ARCHES MAW AND SMALLER S SHALL BE BU UN R CL NERD LAND PR AT VIE A PSI %G) SQUARE PRESSURE. ALR i MI HWIT XON-RISNG STEMI WEN COUNTER QOGKWY AND PROVIDE A TARO (C VALVE OPERATING HUT WITH AN . PRES CAST A ME METAL IND1 WHICH DIRECTION OF OPCNING EAM VALES 9MA11 NAVE ME MASER'S NAPE. PRESSURE RATING AND WAR G. WHICH IT WAS TO THE MRED CAST CH THE BODY. VALKS SHALL L D. TRIP T JSHI ON EACH END. AND FACTORY EAC TO ME SHALLADMINING PIPE NM M APPROVED RETAINER RM E PRIOR TO E TH ENT FROM THE F ING PR EACH VALES SHALL BE TESTED BY HYDN05TATC PRESSURE EQAL TO IYACE THE SPEdFIED WXb(INC PRESSURE. 2. Sund D VALVES SHALL BE PROVIDED WIN A TWO INCH (2'1 SDUAPE WRENCH NUT AND'HAIL SE INSTALLED NTH CAST IRON VALVE BOX AS REWIRED TO ALLOW POSIA ACCESS TO ME VALVE OPERATING NUT AT ALL TIMES IN MSTNLATIONS WERE THE DEPTH FROM GRACE TO TOP OF VALVE OPERATING NIT IS GREATER THAN 9' IV) FEET, A VALVE SIEY RISER SHNl BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED SUCH MAT ME DEPTH FROM THE VALK STEP RISER NUT TO GRADE IS FROM FON FEET TO SIX FEET (4'-6), (MedM LIMOM OF VALVE STEM LASER IS TWO FEET (2)) VAL.K STEM RISERS 9HALL K OF Night STRENGTH STAINLESS STEEL AND OF WEIDED CONSTRUCMNL GATE VALVE DETAIL NTS HYDRANT MANUFACTURER TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND MUST MEET CITY STANDARDS—,. GROUND vALK Box 8' MINIMUM WATER MAN FLAG STORZ CONNECTION /LEDGE PAYMENT 16' / LIMIT MINIMUM 6' BURY 8' GATE VALVE THRUST / BLOCK ALL NJ GLANDS SHALL RE 'MECALUG' OR APPROVED EWAL NOTE:DRANT DRAM SHALL BE PLUGGED. ON SEE WATER TRENCH `CRUSHED STE LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT DETAIL FOR REDOING e' OIA. D.I. PIPE REQUIREMENTS HYDRANT DETAIL NTS ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER . COVER Is LESS MAN W. PLACE LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL WATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY THE CHAMPLAIN WATER wsa:ifOARD CH 1. SUITABLE fnh. A PPE. IN NO CARE SHALL 1NF RPEHAW DISTRICT. THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT. AND THE MC CLRo:AMSTACC Mein 4' OF COVER OVER VILLAGE OF JERICHO. THE SBWD SHALL BE THAT ND TWD Jawn ARE ONE oKR ME DTIER. NOTIFIED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO INSPECT ALL JOINTS, FITTINGS, MAIN LINE TAPS, M APPURTENANCES AND WATER LINE AMEER OF PIPE) CROSSINGS. ME CONTRACTOR SHAI1 AT Aft TYES KEEP TIE TRENCHES - ENTIRELY FREE OF WATER UNTIL ALL W 15 FINISHED AND READY FOR BACNFLUNG NOTFe. ' LEDGE PAYMENT LIMIT 1. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SMALL HAVE a MR POLKTHYLENE PER AwwA lw / M9 t1.5 2. A MINNUM OF 3 BRASS WEDGES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH PIPE MINT FOR 8' D.I. PIPE. TYPICAL WATER TRENCH NTS PUMP STATION DATA A. TOTAL DESIGN FLOW IEPR FLOWS) 4] SINGLE FAMILv UNITS @ 210 GPDNNIT 9,870 GPD INFILTRATION (043 MILES x T DLA X 300 GPDANCH DIA-MILE 1.032 GPO TOTAL DESIGN FLOW • 10.902 GPD B. HEAD LOSSES STATIC LIFT 12.0 FEET FRICTION LOSSESFEET MINOR LOSSES 1.0 FEET TOTAL HEAD LOSSES 25,0 FEET C. PUMP REQUIREMENTS PUMPS & SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY GOULDS OR EQUAL. USE TWO (2) NON -CLOG SUBMERSIBLE WASTEWATER PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PUMPING 130 GPM AT 25 FT. MH. THE PUMPS SHALL BE WOODS MODEL 388504. 1.5 HP THREE PHASE WITH A 4' FLANGED DISCHARGE CAPABLE OF PASSING 3 -SOLIDS. D. PUMP STATION ELECTRICAL SERVICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL MATERIALS MID LABOR AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL AND STATE ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING CODES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL SERVICE INSTALLATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY. ELECTRICAL SERVICE SHALL BE 120V1241W, SINGLE PHASE. E. EMERGENCY STORAGE PROVIDE 4.15 NOURS STORAGE (PER CITY REQUIREMENTS). BASED ON MAXIMUM DAY DELIVERY RATE OVER 16 HOURS'. 10,902 GPD 116 HR. x 4.15 HOURS = 2,828 GAL. REQUIRED STORAGE STORAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE ALARM LEVEL AND WITHOUT SURCHARGING THE INCOMING SEWER MAINIS). STORAGE PROVIDED • 2,814 GAL. (1,8181N THE EXTERNAL STORAGE TANK AND 1.238IN ME PUMP STATION). F. SUBMERSIBLE DUPLEX PUMP STATION REW IREMENTS THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PUMP STATION: VAR MSEE FREQUENCY DRIVE DUPLEX PUMP CONTROLLER MULTITRODE(FLYGTOXYLEM) PUMP CONTROL REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT - HOA SWITCH FOR EACH PUMP IN PANEL - RUN LIGHTS FOR EACH PUMP - ALARM LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACK-UP - MAIN DISCONNECT SWETCH - DUPLEX CONVENIENCE QUIETS IN PANEL - ELAPSED TIME METERS - LIGHTNING PROTECTION - ALTERNATING RELAY & MANUAL SWITCH - TIME DELAY RELAY G. WET WELL LEV L NSOR EM SHALL BE FLYGTXYLEM MULTI TRODE, COMPRISING A MULTI-SENSORED PROBE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MULTEIRODE CONTROLLER. THE PROBE SHALL BE SUSPENDED, WITH A STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING BRACKET AND CLEANING SGEEGEE. AND POSITIONED IN THE RISER SECTION OF THE WET WELL JUST BELOW THE ACCESS HATCH, A REDUNDANT HIGH WATER ALARM FLOAT SWTCH SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED W THE WETWELL, TESTING DATA FORCE MAIN PRESSURE TEST'. ME FORCE WIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO NOT LESS MAN S0 PSI AT ME HIGHEST POINT OF THE TEST SECTION. THE TEST SHALL BE OF TWO HOUR DURATION AND THE TEST PRESSURE SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN •1. 5 PSI. A LEAKAGE TEST SHALL ALSO BE PERFORMED CONCURRENTLY WITH TIE PRESSURE TEST. THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ME FOLLOWING FORMULA L • (Sx DINP)ITM.200 WHERE L • ME ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOAR. S IS THE LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED, D IS THE NOMINAL INSIDE DIAMETER OF ME PIPE IN INCHES, AND P IS THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN PSI. PUMP TA N VALVEPITA ET G N Y TORAGE TANK A TES WE STRUCMRES SHALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE CF THE ENGINEER FOR E%FILTRATION BY FILLING ME STRUCTURES TO 12' BELOW THE ACCESS LID. A STABILIZATION PERID OF FOUR HOURS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ALLOW FOR ABSORPTION. AT ME END OF THE STABI—TION PERIOD THE STRUCTURES SHALL M REFILLED AS NECESSARY AND ME TEST PERIOD OF 24 HOURS SHALL. DEGIN. AT THE END OF THE LEST PERIOD, THE VOLUME OF WATER CHANGE SHALLBE MEASURED. LCKAD VOLUME LOSS SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE -TERM OF ONE PERCENT OF ME TANK CARACITY (0.001 x TANK VOLUME). MERE SHALL ALSO BE NO VISIBLE INFI—TION OR EXFILTRATION OR THE TEST FAILS, IF ME TEST FAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANOKO WATERPROOF ON ME EXTERIOR AND RETEST. AVACUUM TEST(ASTMC-1W)SHALL SEACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF THE WATER TST. A VACUUM TEST WILL BE REWIRED IN LOCATIONS HAVING A HIGH WATER TABLE. C. PUMP STATION: ME CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL BE PRESENT WRING START4 A WATER SOURCE SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO PERFORM A FULL OPEMTONAL CHECK OF ME STATION, INCLUDING ALL PROBE FUNCTIONS. ALARM TESTING, INDICATOR LIGHTS, H-0 SWITCHES, PUMPS AND PUMP ALTERNATOR. THE CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE CYCLED THROUGH MORE THAN ONCE TO VERIFY PROPER SEQUENCING AND OPERATION OF ME PUMPS. EACH PUMP SHALL BE FIELD TESTED TO VERIFY THAT THE PUMPING CAPACITY MEETS THE PROJECT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PUMP STATION MAY REQUIRE TEMPORARY SHEETING AND OR DEWATERING, NECESSARY DEWATERING TECHNIQUES SHALL BE UTILIZED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE DRY SITE CONDITIONS. 2. ME COMPLETE OPERATION OF ME PUMP STATION AND FORCEMAN SHALL BE TESTED IN ME PRESENCE OF ME ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME TESTING SPECIFICATIONS ON THIS SHEET, THE SYSTEM SHALL MEET ME REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEER. CITY. PUMP MANUFACTURER, AND ME STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES. 3, ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL MEET THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. CONDUIT SHALL BE PROVIDED AS NECESSARY. TO INSURE COMPLIANCE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN ME SERVICES OF A VERMONT LICENSED ELECTRICALENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY THAT ALL WORK AND MATERIALS ARE IN WNFORMANLE WIM ALL PERTINENT CODES. 4. ALL OPENINGS FOR PIPES AND CONDUIT IN ME PUMP STATION AND WET WELL SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEALED AND WATERTIGHT. 5. ALL MATERIALS LOCATED WITHIN THE WETWELL SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. SPECIFICATIONS 1. PDMP STATION, VALVE PIT AND EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK SHALL BE PRE-ENGINEERED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF VERMONT AND CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND H-20 WHEEL LOADINGS AT THE DEPTH SHOWN ON THIS RAN, 2. EXTERNAL EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK TO BE A HEAVY DUTY TANK AS MANUFACTURED BY CAMP PRECAST. OR EQUAL. WALL. FLOOR & TOP THICKNESSES SHOWN HEREON ARE NECESSARY TO PREVENT FLOTATION. 3. EXTERNALLY COAT ALL CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITH TWO COATS OF BITUMINOUS WATERPROOFING AND TEST FOR WATERTIGHTNESS. 4, DUCTILE IRON PIPE JOINTS OUTSIDE ME STRUCTURES SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. JOINTS INSIDE OF ME STRUCTURE SHALL BE FLANGED, ALL PIPING INSIDE OF ME STRUCTURES AND THROUGH THE WALLS WALL BE CLASS 51 DUCTILE RON. 5. ALL BACWILL MATERIAL AROUND WE STRUCTURES SHALL BE SAND OR GRAVEL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE AASHTO-T-96 STANDARD PROCTOR. MORTAR WITH NO"TiRIN1 r THICK STYROFOAM SM INSUI KEON PMIELS SUITABLE FOR BURIAL FIRMLY ATTACHED TO ME STRUCTURE WITH ADHESIVE 4'EMERGENCYCONNECTION - CAP (ANDREWS MALE ADAPTOR M WWITHLOCKINGCAP 40ILDC-0) PRWIDE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS AT ALL. - BENDS 4-Son M PVC SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING J NEENAH RIM2 FRAME & COVER OR EQUAL COPOLYMER MAIBK)LE C STEPS®8.1ro.c.TTYP.) -48' 1. D. $�� 5 N DEPTH ONE C USHED 3`TON ,( QUARTER 4 FLANGED CAST IRON TURN BALL VALVE TURN BALL VALVE SLOMATIIW . 78 IC MODEL ]B OR MODEL EQUAL EQUAL VALVE PIT SIDE VIEW MS O CNDUIT TO coNTHOL PANEL SENSORCLEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET S.S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES 4' D I. (BOTH SIDES) - CAST OPENINGS STRAIGHT IN (NOT RADIALLY) 4' CHECK VALVE (TY'PJ _/ \ 4- BALL VALVE (TYP.) PUMP STATION BILCO, PUMP MANUFACTURER OR AN — APPROVED EQUAL ALUMINUM WPLE% ACCESS LID AND FRAME ASSEMBLY CAST -IN -PLACE, PROVIDEPADLWKSWITH SAME KEYSET FOR ACCESS LID, CONTROL PANEL. AND POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH. CONWITTO- S"Il MMMUM JUNCTION BC W(TYP)� ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH BUM PE RO OR A RUBBER O-RING USE FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE FOR PIPE PENETRATIONS OF r OR LARGER / SOLID SLEEVE COUPLING \ UNDISTURBED EARTH 3T.44-OPENING OR AS RECOMMENDED BY PUMP MANUFACTURER COPOLYMER MARHOLE STEPS® NF12. O. C. (TWO ---------- f PUMPS I 1 O L i I I I I / I / .REINFORCED I( - CONCRETE PUMP STATION CONCRETE PROVIDE CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE GASKET FOR ALL PIPES 2- OR LARGER -2WO PSI CONCRETE PIPE SUPPORTS VALVEPIT COTCTETE .. _. AI- SDR 26 PVC FORCE MAIN PUMP STATION PLAN VIEW TITS FORM SUMP USING 2.500 PSI CONCRETE GALV., VINYL COATED VENT CAP NEENAH RUPQ FRAME & WITH BRONZE SCREEN (TYPI COVER 00. EQUAL RIM ELEV= 300.0' 4' GAV. STEEL VENT PIPE 24' MIN 4' TOP SOIL, SEED,PAINED GREEN (TIP.) STAINLESS RECOMMENDED STEEL LIFTING CHAIN AS BY PUMP AND MULCH MANUFACTURER. ATTACH TO R13ER. 6 3lOPETODRNNAW --- .� ----- 24" 38' DIA. REINFORCED CONC. RISER AND FLAT TOP SAWOR.RAVEL IffIL BACILL ONLY • MAX - SENSOR CLEANING SUSPENSION BRACKET 8: S S. SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLY SEAL JOINT WITH BUTYL ROPE 8' SEWER INLET IW ELEV -3)8.28 OR A RUBBER O-RING AND NON-S R W K GROUTATE NON -SHRINK GROUT TO 3MHIN5 PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL ------_ B'MIN 30' VERTICAL PIPE SUPPORTS WITH STAINLESS THREADED ROD ANCHORED STORAGE EIJ.N •3TB.T ALL JOINTS SHALL BEL INTOWECENTER IN. OF 2) 3'ON CENTER MIN. OF 2) SEALED NITRO-RIN ROPC ORARUBBER O-RING ELEV 375.2' MONOLITHIC BASE MINIMUM OFT HIGH 48' MULTITRODE PROBE SENSOR \ STORAGE VOLA 1,616 GAL. -IFS R JS PVC TO PUAi STATION INV. ELEV. 3T52 10 ■' EMEND ENCY STORAGE CONNECTION 8- MIN SLOPE - 2% INV. ELEV • 375.0' ALARM & 2M PUMP IT ELEV • 374.9 N OEPTH OF 3l4'CRUSIIED STONE J M i'kgr•`¢,,(1O7kq;T y01; - �Y.\tI '?was ttc,��'lk Ip POMPON ELEV• ELEV • 313.15' (SEE NOTE BELOW) SIDE VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK NM L— PUMPS SHALL BE SUBMERGED. PUMP OFF LEVEL SHALL BE SET TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 2' OVER THE TOP OF THE PUMPS. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF FLOAT ELEVATIONS ARE ALTERED FROM THOSE SHOWN. PUMP STATION SIDE VIEW NTS ALARM LIGHT (2) PRESSURE -TREATED (.dO CCA) x 6'('WOOD P03T3 UL RATEDNEW4X DUPLEX POWERMETER CONTROL PANEL. SIZE TO HOUSE ALLPUMP CONTROLS AND WEVS. DISCONNECTSWITCH MOUNT ALL PANELS ON PRESSURETREATED(.40 CCA) tj' x 8' WOOD PlANK9 CONUUIT SEAL ALLABOVE GROUND CONDIIIF NEMA 4X $HALL BE SCE N PVC. INSTALL JUNCTION BOX ENCASE POSTS IN EXPANSION JOINTS ON RISERS CONCRETE TO PUMP STATION r SCH40PVC 8' BURIED CONDOR TO POWER SUPPLY_ CONTROL PANEL SIDE VIEW POWER METER DISCONNECT SMTCH TELEMETRY ENCLOSURE�� _� PUMP STATION CONTROL PANEL CONTROL PANF_L TOP VIEW PROVIDE CAST -I FEE ISLE GASKE ALL PIPES r OR &' SDF TO PUMP I 5000 PSI REINFORCED CONCRETE � 1 r-----------------------------------------------� L— 6' MIN I I I -PLACE f FOR I I I MGER I I I I I I I %Nt t 1 i II I I / I SLOPE • 2% W DIA. ACCESS OPENING TATION 1 DM REINFORCED FORCED P VENT PPE CONCRETE OPENING I FLATTOP O I I I I SLOPE=2% IT I I I I 13' PLAN VIEW EMERGENCY STORAGE TANK HTs THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELWW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING 'To! n0. SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON des;gn ABR DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS lOWn ABR ad SEWER PUMP STATION DIG dote 06-06-16 scale LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED Consulting Enginccn, Inc. nc 14 M.- D we Eexx lunetim, VT 05452 Tel: W2-07&4450 13 aoai eomDwJ `- rum - SECTION VIEW (AT PIPE) STORM OUTFALL DETAIL NTS NOT DISTURB VEGETATED SLOPES BEYOND UNITS OF ME DITCH. PROVIDE 4' OF TOPSOIL AND - ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS (CONSERVATION MIX) O IONAL Y SLOPE VARIES ADO i GRUBBING STONE PER VAOT 706.04 (MIN. 24' DEEP, SEE RAN) MATERIAL AND GRA77P%0.005 MI AFIEQ SL FABRIC COVER ON SPILLWAOR EQUAL UNDER AND U UNDISTURBEDTO SIDES OF STONE. GROUND RENCH TO DRAIN MIN. SLOPE OF FT./FT. TYPICAL STONE DITCH / SPILLWAY DETAIL N75 T MIN 3/8' Or- CRUSHED ST(ML OR C STORM SEWER STRUCUTURE - M P GEOTEXIILE FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL AROUND ORATE. INSPE T FABRIC AFTER EVERY STORM AND CLEAN OR REPLACE AS NECESSARY STONE FILTER - SEE SECTION VIEW FOR STONE REQUIREMENTS PI AN \/IFW HOIESI 1, INLET PROTECTION TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL CATCHBASINS OR YARD INLETS 2. THE STONE FILTER SHALL BE INSPECTED FOLLOWING EACH STORM. ACCUMULATED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND ME STONE REPLACED AS NECESSARY I THE LIMITS OF ME STONE AROUND ME INLET MAY BE MODIFIED BY ME ENGINEER DEPENDING ON ME TOPOGRAPHY DIRECTING RUNOFF TO THE CATCHBASIN. CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION NTS PLAN NORM 1, M DMTRANCE SHILL Y HHNNTUND N A I ONARIN MUCH KILL PWWNT TRADING OF SDOMENT 11 PUBIJC MGHTS-OF -WAr. T RLaaL NI -TOP MN59N0 MR, -OVAL STLYE AS CWNTIp9 DCUAND APHID ALL ....T.-U.. -IL M.-1 WA9EDANDOX - OF .1S ON. -IC WpH3�OF�vAr IAA BE NUOWD WMEDMrzLr BY THE COMIWACTDR. 2. W USE OF CROW CHL0WOE LW WATER MAY BE NECESSMr TO CONIRR IMBT IMRNG W vRWER. ENWIAHLE Dµ IVGUI -I-a M11EM 9TABUSD CMSIRIX;TKN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT NTS FOR DISTURBED ROPES USE TREADS PRIOR TO SEEDING A TO CREATE ORWAS PERPENI SOPC DIRECTION TO MINIMIZE WLWTIES. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: TOPSOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND INSTALL MATTING, OR HYDROSEED WITH APPROVED BINDER AFTER SURFACE ROUGHENING. SLOPE GRADING NR POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DPETH & QUALITY TREATMENT NOTES 1. POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY TREATMENT SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 3 OF THE *2017 VERMONT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL RULE AND DESIGN GUIDANCE'. AT A MINIMUM, ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO THESE RULES AND THE OUTLINED TREATMENT AS INDICATED BELOW. ANY ADDITIONAL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING THE COMPACTION OF SOIL DUE TO THE TRACKING OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT, ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE STANDARDS. 2. TOPSOIL SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4% DRY WEIGHT ORGANIC MATTER, AND SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 4' OF DEPTH AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 3. THE COMPOST USED TO MEET ORGANIC REQUIREMENTS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • A CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO BELOW 25:1. • COMPOST SHALL MEET THE DEFINITION OF "COMPOST' IN THE AGENCY'S SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RULES OR THE CONTAINMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERMONT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RULES §6-1104(gx67), §6-1105(ex8-91 AND WT 106(BX7-9). • A MAXIMUM OF 35% OF THE TOTAL SOIL VOLUME MAY CONTAIN EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY BIOSOLIDS AMENDMENTS, AND SHALL BE WELL MIXED. 4. THE SOIL QUALITY REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE MET BY USING ONE OR A COMBINATION OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: OPTION 3: REMOVE AND STOCKPILE EXISTING TOPSOIL DURING GRADING. • STOCKPILE SOIL ON SITE IN A DESIGNATED CONTROLLED AREA, AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS, FLOODPLAINS, OR OTHER CRITICAL RESOURCES; • SCARIFY OR TILL SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 4 INCHES. EXCEPT FOR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES, THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE DISTURBED BY SCARIFICATION; • STOCKPILE TOPSOIL SHALL ALSO BE AMENDED. IF NEEDED, TO MEET THE ORGANIC CONTENT REQUIREMENTS: •• PRE -APPROVED RATE: COMPOST SHALL BE INCORPORATED WITH AN ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT BETWEEN 40-65% INTO THE TOPSOIL AT RATIO 1:3, OR •• CALCULATED RATE: INCORPORATE COMPOSTED MATERIAL OR APPROVED ORGANIC MATERIAL AT A CALCULATED RATE TO ACHIEVE 4 INCHES OF SETTLED SOIL AT 4% ORGANIC CONTENT; • REPLACE STOCKPILED TOPSOIL PRIOR TO PLANTING; AND • RAKE TO SMOOTH, AND REMOVE SURFACE ROCKS LARGER THAN 21NCHES IN DIAMETER. OPTION 4: IMPORT TOPSOIL MIX, OR OTHER MATERIAL FOR MIXING, INCLUDING COMPOST, OF SUFFICIENT ORGANIC CONTENT AND DEPTH. • SCARIFY OR TILL SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 4INCHES. EXCEPT FOR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES, THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE DISTURBED BY SCARIFICATION; • PLACE 41NCHES OF IMPORTED TOPSOIL MIX ON SURFACE. THE IMPORTED TOPSOIL MIX SHALL CONTAIN 4% ORGANIC MATTER. SOILS USED IN THE MIX SHALL BE SAND OR SANDY LOAM AS DEFINED BY THE USDA; • RAKE TO SMOOTH AND REMOVE SURFACE ROCKS LAGER THAN 21NCHES IN DIAMETER' AND • WATER OR ROLL TO COMPACT SOIL IN TURF AREAS TO 85% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. S. SOIL DEPTH SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AND ALL AREAS IDENTIFIED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION. 6. TEST HOLES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY USING A SHOVEL DRIVEN SOLELY BY THE CONTRACTORS WEIGHT. THE TEST HOLES SHALL BE 8' IN DEPTH AND USED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR SELF VERIFICATION THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY PLAN HAVE BEEN MET. T TEST HOLES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN LOCATIONS NOTED ON THIS PLAN OR AS SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. TEST HOLES SHALL BE SPACED AT A MINIMUM OF 50' APART. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NINE (9) TEST HOLES PER ACRE OF IDENTIFIED AREA SUBJECT TO THE POST -CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH AND QUALITY TREATMENT. 8. A DENSE AND VIGOROUS VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED OVER ALL TURF AREAS. SEE LANDSCAPING PLAIN FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES. PLANTING SCHEDULE AND SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. 1. EROSION MATTING WILL BE USED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:IV OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS 2. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING MATTING, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. SOIL SURFACE SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH WITHOUT ROOTS, STONES OR OTHER PROTUSIONS THAT WILL PREVENT THE MATTING FROM BEING APPLIED IN FULL CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SURFACE. 3. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF ME SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE MATTING IN A 6' DEEP X 6' WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12' OF MATTING EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP -SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE MATTING WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAXES APPROXIMATELY 12- APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFLL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH INTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF MATTING BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE MATTING OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12- PART ACROSS ME WIDTH OF THE MATTING. 4. ROLL THE MATTING (A) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. INSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE SIDE OF THE MATTING IS AGNNST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL MATTING MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PUKING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE 1MNUFACTURER'S STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT AND APPLICATION. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS. THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6' MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE MATTING. 5. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL MATTING MUST BE STAPLEO WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON MATTING TYPE. 6. CONSECUTIVE MATTING SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PIKED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE - WITH THE UPPER MATTING PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE LOWER MATTING) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 12- OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA APPROXIMATELY 12' APART ACROSS ENTIRE MATTING WIDTH. EROSION MATTING INSTALLATION DETAIL NTS TURF ESTABLISHMENT SPECIFICATIONS ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT DO NOT HAVE AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AVEYENT. SIDEWALKS, ROOF'S) OR ARE NOT LANDSCAPED WITH BARK MULCH. BE STABILIZED NEW GRASS COVER. ALL SEEDING AND MULCHING FOR ESTABLISHING NEW GRASS COVER SHALL BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15. PLACEMENT O TOPSOIL, AND THE APPLICATION OF SEED. FERTILIZER, LIME (WHERE APPLICABLE), AND MULCH SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1. A MINIMUM OF 4' OF APPROVED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL AREAS PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE DONE WHEN THE GROUND OR TOPSOIL IS FROZEN, EXCESSIVELY WET, OR OTHERWISE IN A CONDITION DETRIMENTAL TO ME WORK. FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL, ME SURFACE SHALL BE RAKED. ALL STONES LUMPS, ROOTS, OR OMER OBJECTIONAL MATERIAL SMALL BE REMOVED, 2. URBAN SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY IN ALL AREAS AT ME SPECIFIED RATE. 3, FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED ONLY AFTER PERFORMING A SOIL TEST AND BE APPLIED BASED UPON SOIL DEFICIENCIES LIME SHALL ONLY BE APPLIED AS NEEDED BASED UPON A SOIL PH TEST. 4. MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE SEEDING OPERATION BY NOT MORE THAN 24 HOURS, MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD UNIFORMLY OVER THE AREA AT A MINIMUM RAZE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT ME APPLICATION OF A TACKDER TO HOLD THE MULCH IN PLACE. IF NECESSARY TO RETAIN THE MULCH, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY AN APPROVED TACKIFIER WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER THE SEED. ALL DITCH CENTERLINE GRADES GREATER MAN 5R OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL HAVE EROSION MATTING APPLIED OVER ME SEED. EROSION MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITH 100% AGRICULTURAL STRAW MATRIX STITCH BOUNDED WITH DEGRADABLE THREAD BETWEEN TWO PIN TODEGRADABLE POLYPROPYLENE NETDNGS NORTH AMERICAN S150 OR EQUAL. S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FULL GROWTH OF CRASS IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATEO. VEGETATION GROWTH SHALL BE PERMANENT AND SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT EROSION OF THE UNDERLYING SOIL UNDER ALl CONDITIONS OF PRECIPITATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR PR07ECTNG AND CARING FOR SEEDED, MULCHED, AND AREAS O ESTABLISHED VEGETATION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ME WORK BY ME OWNER. URBAN MIX GRASS SEED N BY WEIGHT LBS LIVE SEED PER ACRE TYPE OF SEED 31.5 45 CREEPING RED FESCUE 37.25 37.5 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 31.25 37.5 WINTER HARDY, PERENNIAL RYE 100 120 / LIVE SEED PER ACRE URBAN SEED MIX SHALL BE USED ALONG ME NEW STREETS AND ALL LAWN AREAS STANDARD EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS THIS SECTION CONTAINS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS FOR THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. THESE ELEMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO THE SITE SPECIFIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHOWN ON THE PLANS EROSION PREVENTION 1. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, THE AREA OF SOLL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE LIMITED TO THOSE AREAS) THAT CAN BE ACTIVELY WORKED AND MANAGED WITH ME FORCES AVAILABLE. AREAS THAT ARE NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED FORA PERIOD OF 5 DAYS OR MORE, SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED. 2. THI MAXIM MARFA FS IL DISTURBANCEAT ANY W TIME ON THE ENTIR PARCEL SHALL BE LESS MlW 3.5 ACRES. 3. SEDIMENT BASINS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT SARRERS. AND OTHER MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP N ANY LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND SHALL BE MADE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE UPSLORE LAID DISTURBANCE TAKES PLACE. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF SHALL NOT FLOW DOWN CUT OR FILL SLOPES UNLESS CONTAINED WITHIN AN ADEQUATE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL, FLUME, OR SLOPE DRAIN STRUCTURE. 5. WHENEVER WATER SEEPS FROM SLOPE FACE, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OR OMER PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED. B. BEFORE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS OU PIPES ARE MADE OPERATIONAL, ADEQUATE OUTLET PROTECTION AND ANY REQUIRED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CHANNEL LINING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN BOTH ME CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AND ME RECEIVING CHANNEL. 7. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS IN ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRIIERW A NO MORE MAN 500 LINEAR FEET OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. B. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE O TRENCHES. B. ALL SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS A PART OF MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF N AN AREA THAT IS: A. LESS THAN 5% N SLOPE. B. AT LEAST 100 FT. FROM ANY DOWNSLOPE WATER BODY OR CONVEYANCE TO A WATER BODY (INCLUDING STORM DRAIN INLET OR DITCH). C. VEGETATED. PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF SEDIMENT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENTED FOLLOWING DISPOSAL. 9. FOR ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER BY VEGETATIVE COVER, SEEDING MUST SE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER M 10. ANY AREA TO BE STABILIZED FOR WINTER THAT DOES NOT HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION BY CCTOBER 15 MUST BE STABILIZED BY ANCHORED MULCH AT ME WINTER APPLICATION RATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. OR OMER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (E.G. ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT). DORMANT SEEDING (E G. WITH WINTER RYE) IS RECOMMENDED. 11. DISTURBED AREAS BORDERING AND DRNNNG TOROADS MUST MAVEAN APPROPRIATE SEDIMENT BARRIER SPANNING ME EDGE OF THE DISTURBANCE TO PREVENT WASHING OF SEDIMENT ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO ROAD DITCHES. 12, HAY MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. HAY MULCH APPLICATION DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEATA RATE OF 4 TONS PER ACRE, WHERE SUBJECT TO BLOWING, MULCH SHALL SECURED IN PLACE BY TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT (WITH MACK RUNNING PARALLEL TO SLOPE), A TACKIFIER, NETTING, OR REPLACED WIM PROPERLY ANCHORED EROSION MATTING, 13. PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS OF PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL AND COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING (NOT WITHSTANDING STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ELSEWHERE IN MIS PLAN). 14, Al.L TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVEDWRHIN W DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER ME TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. UNLESS OTHERWISE AUMONUED, STABILIZATION 15. ALLAREASBFDISTURBANCEWSTHAV MMPBRARYORPERMANENTSTABLWTION WITHIN 7 DAYS. AFTER MIS TIME, ANY DISTURBANCE N THE AREA MUST SE STABILIZED AT ME END OF EACH WORK DAY. ME FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY: A. STABILIZATION 15 NOT REQUIRED IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN ME AREA WITHIN THE NEXT N HOURS AND THERE IS NO PRECIPITATION FORECAST FOR ME NEXT24 HOURS. B. STABILIZATION 15 NOT REQUIRED IF THE WORK IS OCCURRING IN A SELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION ILE, NO OUTLET) WITH A DEPTH OF 2 FEET OR GREATER (E.G. HOUSE FOUNDATIONEXCAVATION. UTILITY TRENCHES). 18. MAINTENANCE MUST BE PERFORMEDAS NECESSARY TO ENSURE CONTINUED STABILIZATION. EXCEPT M NOTED BELOW. ALL SITES SHALL BE SEEDED AND STABILIZED WITH EROSON CONTROL MATERIALS. SUCH AS MULCH OR ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED OR SECTIONS COM-D. ON THE CUT SIDE OF ROADS, DITCHES SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY WITH ROCK RIP -RAP OR OTHER NON -ERODIBLE LINERS (E.G. RECP), OR WHERE APPROPRATE, VEGETATIVE MEASURES SUCH AS SOD. B. FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUCH AS BORROW OR STOCKPILE AREAS, ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND AREAS WITHIN 50 FT. OF A BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION. A DOYN81.0- PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM CONSISTING. FOR EXAMPLE. OF SILT FENCING. SHALL BE INSTALLEDMNDMAINTAINEDTOCWTAINSOIL. EXPOSEDDSTURBEDAREASADYGENTTOA CONVEYANCE THAT PROVIDES RAID OFFSITE DISCHARGE O= SEDIMENT. SUCH AS A CUT SLOPE AT AN ENTRANCE, SHALL BE COVERED WITH PLASTIC OR MOTEXTILE TO PREVENT SOIL LOSS UNTIL IT CAN BE STABILIZED. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTKIN ENTRANCES WILL BE MAINTAINED TO CONTROL VEHICLE TRACKING MATERIAL OFF SITE, C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICES SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL PERMANENT STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS. SIMILARLY, STABILIZATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CONVERTING SEDIMENT TRAPSIBASINS INTO PERMANENT (POST CONSTRUCTION) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, D. STABILWTION MEASURES SHALL BE APPLIED TO EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DIVAS. DINES. MID DIVERSONS IMMEDATELY AFTER INSTALLATION. E. ALL SLOPES STEEPER MAN 3'.1 (H V), OU 33.3%, AS WELL AS PERMEMR DII(ES. SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS, AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL, UPON COMPETIONS. BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH SOD, SEED AND ANCHORED STRAW MULCH, OR OMER APPROVED STABILIZATION MEASURES (NEGRI AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED. SEE NOTE 1 FOR REINFORCING WHERE WT FENCE IS LOCATED MAIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND. STREAM. OR RECEIVING WATER 4-FT NGH HARM. 100X FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL D STAKE O.C) MAIL isom- II G•,•BIWIi W� WI pl��ii1FBi%%ii%��/L1 ��lANesEs� ,w BE STAKES To iinWEpWI - INTO GROUND FABRIC TO BE DTER - -WOOD STAKE KEYED 6' INTO (ROUND JOINING TWO ROLLS OF SILT FENCE TOP MEW OF MNT BGIES 1) 9lT FENCE INSTALLED WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WETLAND, STREAM, OR RECEIVING WATER SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WOVEN RARE FENCE (MIN. 14 HUFF WIRE WITH 6' MAX. MESH SPACINGS) 2) USE ONLY MANUAL METHODS O INSTALLATION AND CLEANING MTHIN WETLAND AND BUFFER ZONE. 3) PRIOR TO BEGINNING O CONSTRUCTION OR EARMMOVING ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A CONTINUOUS SILT FENCE AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ON THE STE PLAN. 4) FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE USED TO KEY INTHE BOTTOM OF ME SLT FENCE, IF NECESSARY, GRANULAR BORROW SHI BE USED BY ME CONTRACTOR TO KEY N THE SILT FENCE RATHER THAN FROZEN NATIVE MATERIAL. 5 ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND THE PERIMETER OF TOPSOIL STOCKPILES AND AT OTHER L norn AS NEEDED. TEMPORARY SILT FENCE NTS INSPECTION 6 MONITORING 17. THE ONSETE COORDINATOR IS 18, THE ON -SITE COORDINATOR SHALL INSPECT, AND DOCUMENT IN WRITING. THE STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION ON ME PROJECT SITE AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES AND MEASURES IN PUCE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, PRIOR TO PREDICTED PRECIPITATION, AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT WHICH GENERATES A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 19. DURING THE WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD (MT. IS- APRIL I5)DMLY INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND DOCUMENTED, 20. INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE REDUCED TO NOT LESS THAN ONE PER MOM IFTHE ENTIRESITEISTEMPORARILYSTABILIZEDANDALLCIXNSTRMC ACTMTYHAS BEEN SUSPENDEO. INPSECTIONS SHALL RESUME PRIOR CONSTRUCTACTIVITYINMING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ACCORDANCE WITH TI IF REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE, 21. IN ADVANCE OF A PREDICTED RAINFALL OR SNOW'MELT EVENT. ALL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPROPRIATE TO CURRENT AREAS CIF DISTURBANCE MUST BE CHECKED AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATING CONDITION, IF NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM ME CONSTRUCTION SITE TO WATERS OF ME STATE, THIS WILL INCLUDE THE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED SOILS ON THE SITE IN ADVANCE OF ME ANTICIPATED RUNOFF PERIOD. PERMIT NOTICE M. A COPY OF ME DISCHARGE PERMIT, T AL OROATKN TO DISCHARGE. A BREF DESCRIPTION OF ME PROJECT, AND ME LOCATION WHERE THE EROSION PREVENTION MID SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IS AVAILABLE SHALL BE POSTED AT A LOCATION ON ME PROTECT SRE THAT IS VISIBLE TO ME PUBLIC. CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING SEE NOTES ON SHEET 9 FOR CONSTRUCTION EVENT SEQUENCING, SURFACE ROUGHENING GUIDELINES 1, SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY, THEREBY REDUCING ME POTENTIAL FOR EROSION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING FOR TRAPPING OF SEDIMENT. SURFACE ROUGHENING SHALL BE USED: - ON ALL SLOPES WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL BE SUSPENDED AND TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF SEED AND MULCH ON ALL FINAL SLOPES 3H'.1 V OR STEEPER 2. SURFACE ROUGHENING MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY TRACKING WITH EQUIPMENT. OR GROOVING WITH DISKS. TILLERS, SPRING HARROWS. OR ME TEEM OF A FRONT-END LOADER BUCKET. WHERE GROOVING IS USED, THEY SHOULD BE LESS THAN 3INCHES DEEP AND NO MORE THAN 15 INCHES APART. 3. ME SURFACE ROUGHENING MUST ALWAYS BE DONE SUCH THAT THE HORIZONTAL GROOVES RUN ACROSS THE SLOPE AND ACT TO SLOW RUNCFF. 4. WHEN USING EROSION MATTING. AVOID EXCESSIVE SURFACE ROUGHENING. MATTING MUST BE INSTALLED IN INTIMATE CONTACT WITH ME SOIL SURFACE TO BE EFFECTIVE. 5. NEVER BACK BLADE OR SCRAPE THE FINAL SOIL SURFACE, THIS WILL RESULT IN A SMBOM SURFACE, INCREASING RUNOFF VELOCITY. SPECIAL WINTER EPSC PLAN REQUIREMENTS IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INVOLVING EARTH DISTURBANCE CONTINUE PAST OCTOBER 15, OR BEGIN BEFORE APRIL 15. MEN TIME FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED'. STABILIZED ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE ENLARGED TO PROVIDE FOR SNOW STOCKPILING WHILE STILL -HYMNING EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL, PACKED SNOW AND ICE MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND ADDI-Al. STONE PLACED TO MAINTAIN ME LOOSE STONE SURFACE AT STABILIZED CBNSMUCTIONEXITS. 2. THE LIMITS Of DISTURBANCE MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED OR DRAWN N TO REFLECT THE BOUNDARY OF WINTER WORK. THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHALL BE DRAWN IN TO EXCLUDE ALL AREAS TEMPORARILY STABILIZED FOR ME WINTER, AND AREAS WHERE DISTURBANCE DURING THE WINTER 15 NOT PLANNED. 3. BASED UPON THE WINTER ACTIVITIES PROPOSED. THE ON -SITE PLAN COORDINATOR SHALL DEVELOP A SNOW MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT SHALL INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM A ADEQUATE SIZE FOR SNOW STORAGE AREAS B. SNOW STORAGE AREAS LOCATED DOWN GRADIENT OF AREAS OF PLANNED DISTURBWCE C. CONTROL OF SNOWMELT RUNOFF D. PROHIBITING STORAGE OF SNOW IN STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURES. E. A MINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN PERIMETER CONTROLS (SUCH AS SILT FENCE) TOALLOWFORSNOWCL NGANDMAINTENANCE. 4. IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE WITHIN 100 FT OF A RECEIVING WATER, SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED OR REPLACED WITH PERIMETER DINES, SWPLES, OR OTHER PRACTICES RESISTANT TO ME FORCES a SNOW LOADS. 5. THE ONSITE PLAN COORDINATOR INSPECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE MAINTENANCE OF DRANUGE STRUCTURES TO INSURE THAT THEY ARE OPEN AND FREE OF SHOW AND ICE DAMS. 6. SILT FENCE AND OTHER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AHEAD OF GROUND FREEZING. IF PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED DR MAINTAINED AFTER GROUND FREEZING. NO FROZEN MATERIAL SHALL BE USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERMS OR DIKES. OR INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE. T WHERE MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. IT SHALL BE APPLIED TWICE ME STANDARD RATE. OR A MINIMUM OF 4 TONS PER ACRE. B. WHEN MULCH IS USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION, AS NEEDED, IT SHALL BE ANCHORED TO PREVENT BLOWING AND REMOVAL BY WIND. ANCHORNG MAY INCLUDE TRACKING WITH EOWFMENT. -LIGATION OF A TACKIFIER, OR NETTING. 9, TO ENSURE COVER Of DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT. AREAS BF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BE STABILIZED AT ME END OF EACH DAY. WITH ME FOLLOWING EXCEPTI N& A. IF NO PRECIPITATION WITHIN Z4 HOURS IS FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUME IN THE SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS, DAILY STABILIZATION IS NOT NECESSARY. B. DISTURWED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF. SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES. 1D. SNOW MDDR ICE STALL BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF LESS THAN 1' (ONE INCH) MB TO TEMPORARY STABILIZATION. 11. WHERE EXTERIOR CONSTRUCTION ON BUILDINGS WILL CONTINUE, OR WHERE VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED IB EXPECTED, A STABILIZED WORK AREA AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ME STRUCTURE SHALL BE STABKIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL. 390 388 386 384 382 380 378 DATUN ELEV NEW OUTLET — o�nm nwwo STRUCTURE 390 FINISF GRADE 388 oy,7 y A��J 388 s`T OUTLET POOL EXISTING GROUND _OUTLET PIPE — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — FOREBAV _ — — — - 382 380 378 378.00 0 JSU 388 386 384 382 380 378 DATUM ELEV 100 POND EAST SECTION 1" = 10' HOR. 1'= 5'VERT. 150 200 EXISTING GROUND NEW OUTLET STRUCTURE — — — — — — — OUTLET PIPE TOP OF BERM 3y.rU FINISH GRADE SPILLWAY ROCK BORROW Road BORROW I I 378.00 0 TYPICALWEIRORENING 111..1 SEE PLAN FOR SIZE 8 —_ ELEVATION •� 11) HORIZONTAL MM REBAR 'ID -OPENING ORIFICE HOOD NOT SHOWN A SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 0 TLETORIFICEPRECAST �p OR DRILLED IN CONCRETE (FACING CENTER OF POND) BEE PLANS FOR NUMBER, SIZE. AND ELEVATION OF i ORIFICES) %r 38' SUMP tI 50 2M" X 24' HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE ASTIII PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR AASHTO 114KI LOADING WITH PRECAST OPENINGS WATERTIGHT RUBBER BOOT SEE PLAN FOR OUTLET PIPE TYPE A ELEVATION OUTLET PIPE —+ SEE UETAIL THIS SHEET FOR L ANTI-SEEPCOLLARREOUIREMENTS EXTEND BEDDING TO LIMITS OF EXCAVATION 3R" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING UNDIBTURBEDGROUND. REMOVEALL MUCK. ORGANICS OR UNSUITABLE SOIL AND FILL WITH GRANULAR BORROW POND OUTLET STRUCTURE Nis 100 POND WEST SECTION 1"= 10' HOR. 1"• TVERT. 150 ACCESS RISER TO BE PLACED OVER PIPE ENTRY (SEE PLAN) HEAVY DUTY CAST IRON MANHOLE FRAME 6 COVER MARKED'STOW r= p14, 1 I N,A A/VM d,VA, V/Na1 r��OWPE AWAY AI GROUT FRAME TO CONCRETE(TYP.) NON -SHRINK 38' CIA. REINFORCED CONIC. GROUT (TYP) RISER AND COVER (TYPT 30' MIN. B'WIDTH BAFFLE 15�PE 13�PE 0 WATER LEVEL � 18' ABOVE TOP PROVIDE WATERTIGHT, OFUPPERORIFICE 15' OPENING CAST -IN -PLACE BOOTS AT ALL PIPE PENETRATIONS MINIMUM DEPTH - 5.7 ALL JOINTS SHALL BE (STORAGE VOLUME "SOILS CF) INTERIOR TANK DIMENSIONS • SEALED WTT11 BUM 1W LONG X 7' WIDE X&HIGH ROPEONARU68ER Of NG 1� MONOLITHIC BASE (TYP-) - MINIMUM OF I HIGH 1B' BELOW ORIFICE .. 12'MIN. DEPTH OF 378' CRUSHED STONE INVERT / STORMWATER PRETREATMENT TANK SPECIFICATIONS 1, USE A WATERTIGHT, REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE TANK CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING H-28 WHEEL LOADING AT THE DEPTH OF INSTALLATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM STRENGTH OF 5,WO PSI AT 28 DAYS. 2, THE TANK, RISERS, AND ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WATERTIGHT. I BACKFILL SIDES AND TOP OF TANK WITH SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL, ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95%OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE MSHTO-T-IB STANDARD PROCTOR 390 388 386 384 382 380 378 200 OALV. METAL TOP PNIE 0-F F 250 I X' I X• I X I I VEGETATED BUFFER ROOF TOP LENGTH ROOF TOPLENGTH VEGETATED BUFFER 1. SLOPE LAND AWAY FROM BUILDING AT 5%OR LESS. 2. LENGTH OF 6%(OR LESS) IS TO BE EOUAL TO, OR GREATER THAN, THE CONTRIBUTING ROOFTOP LENGTH M 3. SLOPED LAND IS TO BE VEGETATED. M. WITH GUTTERS, THE ROOFTOP AREA CONTRIBUTING TO ANY ONE DOWNSPOUT LOCATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1,000 S.F. 5, DOWNSPOUTS MUST BE 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE NEAREST IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, WITH RUNOFF DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION ITS EACN BE ASEEPCOLLAR SHALL BE A MINIMUM aF 2 FEET ALONG THE LENGTH aF THE PIPE PLOWABLE FILL OR APPROVED CUY UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL W + 1COR 018TANCE TO TRENCH SIDEWAL OR BOTTOM, WHICHEVER 5 GREATER STORMPIRE 1. A MINIMUM OF THREE ANTI -SEEP COLLARS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE OUTLET PIPE FROM THE STORMWATER BASIN. 2. THE COLLAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH FLOWABLE FILL (258 PSI CONCRETE) OR APPROVEDCLAV. 3. PAYMENT FOR THE AN KEP COLLARS SHALL BE CONSDERED SUBSIDIARY TO THE STONNWATER PIPE INSTPLLATKN. ANTI -SEEP COLLAR NITS —NEW OUTLET ORIFICE TO SE CORED IN STRUCTURE WALL 12 ROUND 17 DIA. CGMP HOOD PROVIDE 3-1-DIA HOLES EVENLY SPACED AROUND HCOD AT M' O.C. WELD 1'Xl-"18" ANGLE TO CREATE FLANGE PROVIDE 4 GALV, BOLTS ON EACH FLANGE TO ATTACH TO STRUCTURE STORM TANK #I DETAIL BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE ORIFICE HOOD NITS NTS PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND SIGN LEGEND LEGEND —S m S— NEW SEWER LINE &MANHOLE =e==== ______= NEW CATCH BASIN, PIPE& UNDERDRAIN 490 FINISH GRADE CONTOUR w+�-- NEW WATER MAIN& HYDRANT PROJECT PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREE LINE (D EXISTING TREES, TREE REMOVAL .- ............................ .......300- _ _ _ — — — _ EXISTING CONTOUR — DITCH CENTERLINE w EXISTING WATER LINE —S-------- <D S EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE & SEWER LINE UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE EXISTING FENCE EXISTING CATCH BASIN& CULVERT 8 EXISTING MAILBOX I EX:STSJG BULDINIG 1 PRIOR TO PAVING, COLD PLANE EXISTING PAVEMENT PAVEMENT SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDENING V MIN. SEE PLANS 2" TYPE IV BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT WE AR COURSE EXISTING PAVEMENT MINIMUM 4" TVPE II BITUMINOUS (SPEAR STREET) CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE OR MATCH EXISTING. MAX. 2" LIFTS 2'WIDE AGGREGATE SHOULDER 1/4"/FT (VTRANS SPEC.704.12A) 3 EXISTING SUBBASE 4 4" TOPSOIL, SEE AND MILCH ;d EXISTING GROUND zl ii i 6" COURSE GRADED CRUSHED EXISTING GRAVEL FOR SUBBASE SUBGRADE (VTRANS SPEC.704.05) 18" DENSE GRADED CRUSHED I STONE (VTRANS SPEC. 704.06A) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ROAD WIDENING DETAIL NTS ® SYMBOL MARKING 0 LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN, ® 24" STOP BAR ONLY VR-921 (30" X 36-) ® 4" SOLID WHITE LINE E�IT-.ELEFTLANEMUST TURN LEFT, ® 4"DOTTED WHITE LINE R3-7(30"X30") ® 4• DOUBLE YELLOW LINE It, B" YELLOW LINE Q WORD MARKING ® PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING SIGNS 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON NEW 2" SQUARE STEEL SIGN POSTS WITH ANCHORS. SEE VTRANS STANDARD T45 FOR POST AND ANCHOR DETAILS. 2. ALL NEW SIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, THE 2009 MUTCD, AND THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS 2012 SUPPLEMENT. 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A T HEIGHT CLEARANCE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN L - i s - I GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 00 120 0n Niet) 1 InM • 3o n. NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE REMOVED BY GRINDING USING A DIAMOND GRADE GRINDER (REFER TO VTRANS SPECIFICATIONS 646.12 REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS) 2. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MUTCD STANDARDS. 3. COORDINATE WITH GMP ON UTILITY POLE RELOCATION WITHIN LANE WIDENING LIMITS ON SPEAR STREET. 4. RELOCATION OF MAILBOXES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH VTRANS STANDARD J-3, D MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAILS. I ) � SPy5! LFEN �® .SpL{T.RAIL FEIIC -3 .. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION LEGEND PROJECT PROPERTY LINE LOCATION MAP N.T.S MICHAEL & MARY P. BRETT GRABOWSKI SCOLLINS & JENNIFER MILOT NIF N/F VOL. 115. PG. 523 VOL. 643. PG. 297 317.06 1' IRF 1407'01�59' 2"IPF 268.32. 1,107.14'44'W 2.5' AG VT CRUD ) ILA ISHAM ESTATE 21.55 THOMAS & LOUISE WE KLEH LIFE ESTATE 1.Y IPF VOL, 4(S. PG. 126M�F _ BURLINGTON N05'02'35'W CITY OF SOUTH BURL VOL. 1254. PG. 279 - � 7.90' VOL. 934. PG. 104 PS Clry 49�E 90'4 OF SOUT"I N* U IPF 0.8'AG 5' / VOL. gRlll'IGTON VALf DR1.102 I I � JOHN LARKIN N/F ammmom IPF IRE TSF ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED TO BE DISSOLVED SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBED WIRE FENCE STONE WALL IRON PIPE FOUND IRON ROD FOUND T-STAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET IPS IRON PIPE SET Q SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER) NIF NOW OR FORMERLY AG ABOVE GRADE BG BELOW GRADE VOL. 10111, PG. 77 NOTES: �- 1. T1 i1S PUT WAS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD RESEARCH INCLUDING THE USE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS: A. -LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF, SWIFT STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAT.- DATED 4-2-01. VALE DRIVE LAST REVISED 5.23-03, BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING i ENGINEERS, INC. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE392 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. B. "SWIFT ESTATES, SOUTH BURLINGTON, IN VOL.O80 DATED 184 O L BY SOU ENGINEERING, LA RECORDED IN V. 80, PAGE 1B4 OR THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. / C. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOWS. UVM & STATE �`. INC., R & T TARRANT. D & C FRANZONI, 1340 SPEAR STREET. SOUTH AGRICULTURAL U) m BURLINGTON, VERMONT-, DATED JANUARY 25. 2011, BY CIVIL COLLEGE "Q IRON ROD FOUND PINNACLE AT SPEAR ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS RECORDED IN SLIDE W OF NIF m 9.96' S76"3537'E OF IRE fsF OPEN SPACE THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. VOL. 134, PG. 364 y IRON PIPE TO BE SET 0.7' AG �-- �29A.d4' 0.W AC' I NIF T IF S NO3'23'46"W D. "PLAT OF SURVEY, LANDS OF FARRELL 6 COLE, 1302, 1340 & 1350 I SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT', DATED mNOVEMBER 29, 2005, BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., AS ( RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. Q ^ / ,t I 52 ,y E. 'FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILO7 O a OP ACRES I AND JOHN LARKIN, PINNACLE 0 SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWLANO TWO) 1 WILLIAM & MAUREEN PROPOSED LOT S SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT' DATED 8-21-98, GILhBBEERT LAST REVISED 1599, BY VAUG41N C. BUTTON. L.S.. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 335.2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. ( 1 VOL. 209. PG 225 2. Tre THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE GENERATED FROM - --� - SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS RECORDED IIC ORDIAPRILATE AND ARE BASED ON THE VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSIEM. NAD83(CORS 1996). S 1 REST 1 _ Z 3, THE FIELDWORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL, 2016. 4 ( -- 1 I � 5. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO OTHER EASEMENTS ANDJOR a<' V IPF RIGHTS-(F-WAY. FL -765.14' 6. MONUMENTATION FOUND IS AS NOTED ON THIS FLAN 1" I SHED S88"01'32'W gS GARAGE I 7. THE WIDTH OF FOUR RODS (66'I SHOWN FOR SPEAR STREET IS 0.l' AG / DAVID & LINDA ,i 1.5' IPF '�'� BASED ON A DESCRIPTION FOUND ON PAGE 22 OF THE TOWN OF YOUNG 100.23' KATHLEEN SAWTELLE 1-1' AG _ NIF S74"55'22"W BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS, 1802-1865. N� VOL. 412, PG. 99 VOL. 1139 PG. 83 � I j I 8. SEE SHEET PL-2 FOR THE METES AND BOUNDS OF THE PROPOSED J A S70•W.11 INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES. FOOTPRINT LOTS, AND PROPOSED R EASEMENTS. g 19s.sr IPS v 3 KENNf_TH MILLER, II BB'01'32"W 511A0' a O> N/F S 9 VOL, 1114, PG, e9 � H / / DWL. I Ic^ -3/d'IPF OWL. '14.06' < '33 0.A , G R / .. • ` O ,�q• iD SI'V/F7S7 qs ! - l C MARGARETA DENCKER C NIF VOL. 137, PG. 323 ra n l)//v� N 6'3g39 I ( u D441 MARK & SHEILA ` - C'q A PHILN� E I \ S J0.6%-G S VOL. 50, PG. 350 � ROBERT B TAM MY AVONDA NIF LAVIGNE ` VOL. 1045, PG. 221 N/F GRAPHIC SCALE f IyOif 7) CIMONETTI T_ RN\ PPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT \�U REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, \� VERMONT, ON THE 1st DAY OF AUGUST , 2017 OWNER: ER: SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 1m 2m 4I GARY N. FARRELL (VOL •T7, PG 402) & 1350 SPEAR, LLC (VOL 1031, PG 73) & SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. (VOL 747. PG 653) 1350 SPEAR STREET ( IN FEET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. I Inch - !00 ft. TOTAL PARCEL AREA • 25.93 ACRES OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF 2018 BY (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS PLAT IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM PERTINENT DEEDS AND/OR OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH THE REOUIREMEN%F 27 VS/) 1103. DATEDITHIS,fL AY OF ,�YfL, 2018 #656 DOUGLAS L. HENSON i� No. 656 I � ' 1, 1111 11 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. RECEIVED FOR RECORD , 2018 AT O'CLOCK_M.,AND RECORDED IN SLIDE J/ ATTEST: CLERK " PROPOSED 15 FEET WIDE SIDEWALK SIDELINE OF VARIABLE WIDTH PROPOSED S VT CJUD EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF F BURLINGTON. EASEMENT TO BE SOUTH BURLINGTON. SIDELINE OF PROPOSED CENTERED ON THE SIDEWALK AS EASEMENT TO BE 5 FEET WEST OF THE EDGE CONSTRUCTED. OF THE PAVED PATH AS CONSTRUCTED. ILA ISHAM ESTATE PROPOSED 20 FEET WIDE PAVED PATH EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH NIF VOL. 405. PG. 728 21.55' BURLINGTON. EASEMENT TO BE T. & L. KLEH CENTERED ON THE PAVED PATH AS N!F NOS`O7 (R= STRUCTED. VOL. 175, PG. 183 - �-SITE M. & M. SCOLLINS IF, -r3�37.IIa P-BRETT GRABOWSKWE 8 JENNIFWE L. MILOTVOL, 115. PG. 523 317.06• IPF ...��""-'- 364 05' _ j4 a• VOL. 643. PG. 297 LOCATION MAP NF�Tp''_9"^___ _ - - 6 N R=120.00' 4 aces p - `� _ - N.T.S 268._ 72 I L 118., 1p7"1a'aa�_- - - _ 311E p 'I O * S07"11'41"E - 18U 00' 1@1 ,JFL>4006 rN ,6 ,� � ,8 '"laq^ _. 4 R = 330 OU' R = 120 00' .180.OD'PROPOSED 30 FEE73L = 52.A5' L = 101.77'WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE ,1k a 8 u > R = 470.00' 64.R =273.00' N16271' S�7 - L112.8770N�a,PaCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON NW'S0'03R e#PROPOSED 20 FEE7 WIDE .36 L = 78.03 -N1 4 1°24' 'W S10"ag41 E WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE R - 470.00 L = 109.82' R = 530.00 L = 0 u - }$) L = 41.6T L = 83.58' M10 _.42a• + ®4 PS R i ;12- -s / R = 180.1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON $ 1 $04,SO'03"E 164.02 u L - 17 1 t5 .6 j,31P3 ® ® �4 .Ngo]e 43,3- Sp7.11'41'E � 9 ,... R = 726.00 L = 112 2 ' .....4 ® Q Rom_ UVM & STATE R = 666A0' - -. L i6U BD AGRICULTURAL ( L = 99.87' R • 270.00' R = 180.00' 5 COLLEGE PROPOSED ® _ L • 43.24' L = 3.20' y 6.60 ewes WF VOL. 134, PG. 364 STORMWATER POND 1O R=q� IRF _ �- TSF IPS NO3`23'46W 29744 I 1 4 5, _ --'� R = 531.�' 3.35 acres W. 111 GILBERT FR N!F 49 ' VOL. 209, PG. 225 No U o2.95saesSIDELINE OFPROPOSED 70.W STORMWATER EASEMENT TO7.6 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON R-471.00' 4 L : 211.85' 3 M1 667' R=230.00' 4 7WTE Also �+IPF 9,�PSIP KATHLEENLLE osz 6F.1 6 VOL. 11 PG. 83 ¢zO +'V* 1 R1 &32 Bt 'I O0. 1400•�46'W -. yy2 R-�,-- . ._.., ti IPS Al IPS �aa1a � 1.A3 acres ti ® a If - ON Z .IPF 45.94' 14.061/ N75.0r'2- is, ^1 Et �� TSF MARK & SHEILA PROPOSED 15WIDE UTILITY- I EASEMENT TO HOMEOWNERS PHILUPPE ASSOCIATION ` N✓F VOL. SQ PG. 350 I ROBERT&TAMMY AVONDA NIF LAVIGNE VOL. 1045, PG. 221 N/F CAPAONETTI NIF GRAPHIC SCALE IW 0 b 1. 200 400 ( IN FEET ) I Inch = 100 ft, APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST , 2017 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION, SIGNED THIS DAY OF 2018 BY (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) NUMBER PNT NORTHING FASTING 1 3.5009E 2W I "I.-1460980.83 =2 707W.24 1460oFrt.91 2 3,60U 9F N103 107W.m 100otle41 2004 107630.7y 1ax0y[Fi.69 3 3.!-0U 9F 200s 1077- 101000.90 2lXM 11%tr ]H 1181000.66 4 � soe sF 20W 70 9osso Heoe9e.m 2mP r9rule.:R 14P1a0323 s 3.5009i 20W rs 6a6 tlM1oyre.a2 mm 015)8.a7 1161006.Be 6 3.90C SF ]Otl /075pS.87 1b1003.5] Ota 10731M ZD H6101170 7 3.5(p SF a013 1071P6q 11M11013.35 20q (OHM m 116101B.Ra 9 3.:q0 SF a015 '0 16.2t 11etM. ix 101. , 146703A10 5 4rAU 9f 2.O a1.90 11.1.1.31 2tlln 1070180 1W10e1A9 10 ,1.eA lf' mty 101m.m 14We3411 i0a0 m7202K 1NWR.10 it 316099f 20I1 m71e260 11610W.11D M22 ml 13). 1A107116 12 3.W $F 2073 1.111.18 11e On P1 mat N535•. 14e10M,l 11 2662 9f Y• 0.14.a3 0 mN 0 0a tl4 i b OPo 14 Z0.12 $1 ]02X )OroW M 6 ox0 .21 rosot71M1 tlIM 3R 1s 2.P62 SF my 7ofiynea uetwl.3e .26 1-7 )9 14810YI23 1P 2.6529f Z029 Ostly(I.1M 1/8008428 20Y M95fi.fl.: 14x09M.A7 li 2.652 SF 3090 5x. !. tnE0941 or 2011 ,1 14fA965.s1 11 2 G:,211 l011 1W124 e5 460&6.(7 ]032 70 MA 41i0& . r 2AU SF 2n13 2o6ra :n 14s1n4s3A 2034 -t m 14610T7.14' 20 25:123F 1034 71166rtl 95 '1.11177.71 JU35 7000%P.9" t4flt t0a.'Y,I 21 �xsa. sF 10N. 2o3s ]0�-005.ro 7oePfis �s 146110120 11x1 r9n,5n-. fl 2.7709E .31 -roTg713 116UW 1 ro>A 101.0.M 14M1W36.21� 21 3,-W 203P /0I)0:4 UO t100911,7y r 20M r07UH3.:f1 r4609t1.29 3.060W =70 ronu9ss) r4ucgeen 201a /IS.at 141b093 25 30809E 2013 nl inF.rn t46UP4A23 MN 70t;;9].35 1460M3.12 NUMBER PNT NORTHING EASTING 2e 3,1139E ass 101146.51 1160A15.3o a04e 1012'7P.PI td60611.Y 27 277u 9F 2041 a11i2B1.91 t160063.36 a04P .11315.57 14 0 6.W ae 3. 111 SF "a, mr362.I3 i4606P0.76 2.2 1-M 14-174. ]A 2,m. 2040 10-1 11 14-l- 70715e. 14-2- 30 :I,Ox08F 2059 i0743P3 146001- 2051 07sa71P 1400We.39 31 3.0609f 20.55 7073N1.36 141gy01.21 205e 70]eM.02 11NIewLro 3a 2 r70 SF ms7 7o)fize v 111ga01.19 MY 70m6Lm 14606o2.1e 33 1, 1139E 2059 707674.21 11db51.f61 20W 70770110 116084S.ty 3r 1,6M SF 20fi1 )o73syM 1-16P1,31 1 2%2 70753043 11PO1- M 3.S00 Sf 20P2 70753043 1111tWBe.31 2083 1074e111 t1e0606Ab 38 /.SM SF aaa4 0 4-Al 11eoe09.9e 7066 0 41a.10 1160e1a2y 37 1.SOO bi lUYs ro 112A1 116061e2y 1066 r0 3ez.eo IIe06i6.M >8 1.SOIlSf 2UN m 427 tk 11904t- 211fle ]] 1-16W 3A 3.5W 9F '20P 0 w 14P0612.72 A)70 m1r48.2! H8060/.11 10 3!AO SF 2010 707aN )G 1460 .H .11 707W5. 14e04ee0P 41 3,300 SF Al2 707M1I5.21 14-K 17 .13 7078 . 1M 4'. 42 ]1 13 SE mi14.41 x016P.M -W2.sy J60541.03 43 27709E 11- 11-- 14SI1530.91 2017 M1771- W 140047&72 14 3.113 SF 2060 x 1. A 14MH111n 208 1 t4B0390.20 45 2,7709E 21;70 Ol-r 1 14N14e3.13 .11 70a1- 146W01.03 46 3,1136E 2042 70764091 1460358.2e 2093 lOrfi!d.75 IIxO?2D.33 47 2,170SF 1081 ro)et6.n'v 11e00t821 20P0 roltay.7e 11eWP6.32 sow xme ron19.7o 11M1o1yx.27 IP 1M7 70M70.fle 1160151.BP Cx1pN HMy 70ofi 30]1 1M1021.12 OWNER: SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1340 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 05403 VOL. 747, PGS. 653.65E TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. THIS `% G PLAT IS BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED . FROM PERTINENT DEEDS ANOIOR OTHER .�, .�. DOUGLAS f - OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND MARKERS EVIDENT L. ON THE PROPERTY, AND CONFORMS WITH 'I'HE - HENSON REQUIREMENT$. OF 27 VSA, 1403. DATED THIS DAY OF " .� No. 656 `- i�le, rIYZ .2018 ll i�ljL Z l !Y/j/�/I L.S. #656 7 , LEGEND - PROJECT PROPERTY LINE - ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE - - SIDELINE OF EASEMENT ' _ -- '---"-•-'" BARBED WIRE FENCE STONE WALL IPF IRON PIPE FOUND IRF IRON ROD FOUND TSF T-STAKE FOUND ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET IPS IRON PIPE SET NT NOW OR FORMERLY AG ABOVE GRADE BG BELOW GRADE QCOMMON AREA LOT NUMBER FOOTPRINT LOT NUMBER - NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 1 (PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT) FOR SURVEY NOTES, THE PROJECT BOUNDARY, AND LOT 52. 2. THE AREAS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAT FOR THE COMMON AREA LOTS EXCLUDE THE AREAS WITHIN THE RESPECTIVE FOOTPRINT LOTS. 34.0' G m 50.0, TYPICAL FOOTPRINT TYPICAL FOOTPRINT LOTS 1-12 & 35-41 LOTS 13-21 3,500 s f 2.652 s f 44.0' 54.9 N r 54.0' 44.0' TYPICAL FOOTPRINT TYPICAL. FOOTPRINT LOTS 22, 27, 29, 32, 43, LOTS 24, 25, 30 AND 31 45 AND 47 3,0B0 s f 2.770 6 f 60 o' 28.0' In IN I.. _.I 82.9 - 600 TYPICAL FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT LOT 34 LOTS 23, 26, 28, 33, 42. 3.600 s f 44 AND 4B 3,113.1 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. RECEIVED FOR RECORD . 2018 AT O'CLOCK _ M., AND RECORDED IN SLIDE 6 ATTEST: CITY CLERK t �1 Revised 912010 h W, ` g Interested Persons Record and Service List ;0 .9� V ER M ON Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has squght interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. A V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST J. V J I(Ve (Ai lli`- it S5D �cs5�vrej L l l r ( `( Ati6(LtW CASS�7WAN XCc6s4"Oct'v)6 we 'ci7� �cfS cC I1�1 io �rfitrc It �1�f�1u� t'l%tom Sty r� bu-4'v�� +q MOB Tx:r-- ot LAVAt-ILOA-1 � �it✓ 1 S'✓1 dl(v v, •16 Revised 912010 r Interested Persons Record and Service List Southba�r1 % V E R M 0 N T Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). Acopy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 4 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: C3 Z PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST c t bcrf • 5 ►�/;,uses P a , 3 � j '� r � o_ a�c� wS , �r .5 i 1 ; r� Oc�01y��, �- Co�, " YLlv� f- GL. ? �! (Lv i Ll�i • i Revised 912010 Interested Persons Record and Service List Southbughi gton V EO M 0 NT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has squght interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. '4 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: ao PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST S I /,� 4r k/1 Z�Cd �%i - iJ�iL /p/ /ems 4�1e� - Gc�c r/i 1 7w1wo A Z� &-S'W3 — -;, Scc(i K. A&jTE1P—V 14So ►-IiN�S���cT2i, �'�// - ;„Tip! 1'���ri.ai�►G;�o1v VT Il.�� U'tCW MYl I� L A r-K I N i LL tr1 e-P DIC KIZciSAN.9 L-c'1A-i LA L-'cAJ I� �L r� 3 F�,-4n, 16 „:� south 1Lit 't{t��� t. VERMONT Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has squght interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. '4 V.S.A. § 4471(c). `L., HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS 61 MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 1'tAMC -- ]F� L/IRKinlbnl vI bryal Sly but e 40. 3 a('j t-j s 61 11-lo rJ 17C .3 , -A G ck a Cr' 4' -- ` L , ^� �)V)56 VY-X0 L02: t 6 ' c: nF'Tr�u,�(� �'fJ�l'V1rL�c�� U/iL t4a ,✓lx a5�a J ��J.�/( /LC.-CW( -��)�� ��ve 7; �Yz '70 ��-5O �T/'� _ 4-q bw6c"- 'U o r ►mow e, to i �uW t��(�Q��� - 1 ��` o Sy o s J '�dse�c L�JCnW� L��'l�� � I�wc.c�ce��,c ® ►31.5 moll is)Zn Rn� �y .�9'jr , �T 05g03 l—��c��c�, s�� �� •�ISIc� J USPS TRACKING # First -Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 9590 9402 1475 5329 5623 02 United States Postal Service • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+41 in this box• CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. A. Signature ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X J , V 4 l � � ,Agent so that we can return the card to you. ❑ Addre ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by (Printed Name) Da of�� or on the front if space permits. I. Article Addressed to: A Oq 00- 14 #/,9 ,r Y� 0 �qj�� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 9590 9402 1475 5329 5623 02 � 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7016 3010 0001 1194 1948 PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: �Rlo 3. Service Type ❑ Priority Mail Express® ❑ Adult Signature ❑ RegisterMail'"' Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Register Mail Restrictei VuIt rtified Mail® Delivery El certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Return Receipt for ❑ Collect on Delivery Merchandise ❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery 0 Signature ConfirmationrlS n 1.. —A Mail ❑ Signature Confirmation Mail Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery 00) Domestic Return Receipt ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ [J Return Receipt (electronic) $ l ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ El Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult SignatureRestricted Delivery $ z Sent To A //- V �/Y ----- -------- Streeta---Apt. No - --- - x---- ---------- - Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■ A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt, see a retail ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece. associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate ■ Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee, present this delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the ■ A record of delivery Qncluding the recipient's signature) that is retained by the Postal Service - for a specified period. Important Reminders: ■ You may purchase Certified Mail service with First -Class Mails, First -Class Package Service®, or Priority Mails service. ■ Certified Mail service is not available for International mall. ■ Insurance coverage is notavailable for purchase with Certified Mail service. However, the purchase of Certified Mail service does not change the insurance coverage automatically included with certain Priority Mail items. ■ For an additional fee, and with a proper endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request the following services: - Return receipt service, which provides a record of delivery (including the recipient's signature). You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Retum Receiptattach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; r 1 associate. Restricted delivery service, which provides delivery to the addressee specified by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent. Adult signature service, which requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age (not available at retail). Adult signature restricted delivery service, which requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age and provides delivery to the addressee sbecified by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent (not available at retail). ■ To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is accepted as legal proof of mailing, it shoyid bear a USPS postmark. If you would like a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, please present your Certified Mail item at a Post Office- for postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt for your records. PS Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-024X)0.9047 south`,M .' ..._ _.... PLANNING & ZONING August 2, 2017 Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Final Plat Approval #SD-17-14 — 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street Dear Mr. Rowe: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board on the above referenced project, the hearing for which was closed on June 20, 2017 (effective date 08/01/2017). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plans must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) within 180 days (must be submitted to me in time for recording along with a $15 recording fee by January 28, 2018) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7016 3010 0001 1194 1948 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary ❑✓ Final PUD Being Requested? R✓ Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Spear Meadows, Inc. & Gary N. Farrell & 1350 Spear, LLC 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol 100, Pg 42 Vol 1031, Pg 73 - 1350 Spear, LLC Vol 677, Pg 402 - Farrell 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) The Snyder Group, Inc. 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 985-5722 csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Andrew Rowe - Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 878-4450 878-3135(fax) a. Contact email address: Andy@LDengineering.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1640-1302/1340/1350 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Demolition of an existing SF home and construction of 18 single family homes, 10 duplex buildings, and 3 triplex buildings. The existing single family home at 1350 Spear Street will remain. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Existing single family homes are located at 1302 Spear Street and 1350 Spear Street. The parcel at 1340 Spear Street is currently vacant. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): One existing single family home, 18 new single family homes, 10 new duplex buildings, and 3 new triplex buildings. A public park parcel is proposed to be conveyed to the City. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing buildings = 7,700 SF Proposed buildings (new & existing to remain) = 142,780 SF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): The new single family homes, duplex, and triplex buildings will be two stories. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): One existing residential unit will be demolished. One existing residential unit will remain. 47 new residential units are proposed. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): not applicable - residential PUD h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A portion of the project parcel is located in the Dorest Park View Protection Zone. The parcel is in the Potash Brook watershed and is subject to the Surface Water Protection Standards. i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. The project involves 3 existing parcels that will be merged and subdivided as shown on the property plats. Both footprint lots for the new homes and open open space parcels are proposed. The exist. house will be on a separate lot. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 25.93 acres b. Building Coverage: Existing 7700 Proposed 152,280 (acres /sq. ft.) square feet 0.7 % square feet 13.5 c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 14,440 square feet 1.3 Proposed 323,115 square feet 28.6 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? 0 Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) Wetland and/or buffer impacts are associated with the street/utility crossing, stormwater ponds, and access drive to the public park. c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 16 acres SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 8,450,000 b. Landscaping: $ 107,450 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) sitework & utilities = $ 1,500,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 52 PM peak hour trips 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30-8:30 AM & 4:30-5:30 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Frida 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2019 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shal be paid to the City at the time of su fitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. ,,, J-//�o g �-,, /�- X NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge, I-% ATURE'UMPPLICANT Gary Farrell -Spear Meadows, Inc. S-16 T . Y OW ...... OF PROPERTY' PRINT NAME .... ... .... ....... Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: _ ._...._....__..,!. _......1. '1 _. /� -------- . .......... I have reviewed this prelirnin plat application and find it to be: Complete Flneomplete .. .. .. ....... /nistra2 er Date W The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project, Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit specialist. Subdivislon Application Form. Rev, 12-2011 % I r t-t- K'' C_ I Received Fe20f2015 09:30A Recorded in VOL! 1254 PG: 97 y�� 0 033 10 V: 1254 PG OF So. Gurlinston Land Record Donna Kinville cib Clerk Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement NOW COME Vermont Land Trust, Inc., a Vermont non-profit corporation having its principal place of business in Montpelier, Vermont ("VLT") and Spear Meadows, Inc., a Vermont corporation having its principal place of business in Colchester, Vermont ("Optionce") who hereby agree as follows: WHEREAS, Optionee entered into an Option Agreement with Leduc Farm, Inc. on February 12, 2009 (the "Option"), a Notice of which is recorded in Volume 837, Page 225 of the South Burlington Land Records, whereby Optionee acquired the right to purchase 25 transferrable development rights ("TDRs") for the purpose of increasing the density of its proposed development on "Optionee's Property" as defined in the Option; WHEREAS, on August 6, 2009, Optionee exercised its right under the Option to acquire 31 additional TDRs; WHEREAS, VLT acquired the TDRs from Leduc Farm, Inc. and took an assignment of the Option by Warranty Deed, dated September 30, 2009 and recorded in Volume 896, Page 228 of the South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, VLT and Optionee entered into an Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement, dated December 21, 2012 and January 3, 2013 and recorded in Volume 1131 at page 235 of the South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, the Optionee continues to pursue the permits and approvals for the development of Optionee's Property, as described in the Option; WHEREAS, the term of the Option expires on February 14, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Optionee desires to extend the term of the Option for an additional three (3) years and VLT is willing to so extend the term of the Option. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and in reliance upon the representations contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows (all capitalized terms not hereunder defined having the same meaning herein as in the Option): 1. Section 3 of the Option is amended to state that the Term of the Option shall terminate at 12:01 a.m. on the 14a' of February, 2018 (the "Expiration Date"), unless extended by written agreement of the parties. 2. Section 2 of the Option is hereby amended to state that the Optionee shall make three (3) Additional Option Payments in the amount stated in the Option, which payments shall be due on the sixth (6's), seventh (7`s) and eighth (8`h) anniversary dates of the Effective Date. rM 00033810 V e 1254 PG-- 9 3. This Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement may be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 4. All other terms and provisions of the Option as amended and not previously modified remain in full force and effect. ` ` F10l'lG� a- "k Dated at 1 V a' U f S , V.e"ertt this 1 1day of Orlk 2015. Spea By: _ Duly Vermont Land Trust, Inc. By:2��IF/� Duly Authorized Age State of Vermont C ;%, tte,r,,f e , County On this / ? "day of ►= 6 , 2015 personally appeared R, � t,"'-= %{� r,,,, JT duly authorized agent of Vermont Land Trust, Inc., to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Land Trust, Inc. Before me: 1?q�' 1,U-0 � Notary Public My Commission Expires: 211012OW 19 Hoe-tdo State of Vermont Cc 11, -e-4?- County On this day of "YuA-r , 2015 personally appeared C� Fa rre I l ,duly authorized agent of Spear Meadows, Inc., to me known to be the person wh executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of Spear Meadows, Before me: J If C� Notary Publi%Ga /auG My Commission Expires 01 uu►►►►1 �.gEAUC!o�� ``�� Q.�ggION F,�.• � .; �.•a► t �?per .a0 2 � OFF .• a END OF DOCUMkNi Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost April 2017 Foundation Plantings Item Size Unit I Cost* Quantity Subtotal Foundation Plantings (see plan for species options) . -1 Deciduous shrubs #3 $50 18 $900 Evergreen shrubs #3 $50 12 $600 Total cost per dwelling unit: $1,500 47 dwelling units x $1,500 / unit = $70,500 Trees on Common Land Item Size Unit Cost* Quantity Subtotal Trees Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 7 $4,200 Quercus robar'Skymaster' Skymaster English Oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 14 $8,400 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 4'-6' height $200 22 $4,400 Picea glauca White Spruce 4'-6' height $200 21 $4,200 Pinus strobus White Pine 5'-6' height $200 40 $8,000 Tilia americana American Basswood 2 - 2 1/2" Cal $475 6 $2,850 Thuja occidentalis 'Nigra' Northern White Cedar 4'-6' height $125 44 $5,500 Total Common Land Trees: $37,550 TOTAL ALL LANDSCAPING $108,050 Proposed construction costs 18 SF homes @ $200,000 $3,600,000 20 duplex units @ $175,000 $3,500,000 9 triplex units @ $150,000 $1,350,000 Site work $1,500,000 TOTAL $9,950,000 Required Landscapinq Value $ 250,000 @ 3% $7,500 $ 250,000 @ 2% $5,000 $ 9,450,000 @ 1% $94,500 TOTAL $107,000 Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost - Phase I (See Construction Phasing Plan for limits of Phase 1) Foundation Plantings April 2017 Item E77--Cost* Size Unit Quantity Subtotal Foundation Plantings (see plan for species options) Deciduous shrubs #3 $50 18 $900 Evergreen shrubs #3 $50 12 $600 Phase I - Total cost per dwelling unit: $1,500 19 dwelling units x $1,500 / unit = $28,500 Trees on Common Land Item Size Unit Cost* Quantity Subtotal Trees Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $0 Quercus robar'Skymaster' Skymaster English Oak 2 112" - 3" Cal JF $3,000 Abiesbalsamea Balsam Fir 4'-6' height $1,200 Picea glauca White Spruce 4'-6' height $1,600 Pinus strobus White Pine 5'-6' height $200 37 $7,400 Tilia americana American Basswood 2 - 2 1/2" Cal $475 0 $0 Thuja occidentalis 'Nigra' Northern White Cedar 4'-6' height $125 0 $0 Phase I - Total Common Land Trees: 1 $13,200 PHASE I TOTAL $41,700 Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost - PHASE II (See Construction Phasing Plan for limits of Phase II) Foundation Plantings April 2017 Item Size Unit Cost' Quantity Subtotal Foundation Plantings (see plan for species options) Deciduous shrubs #3 $50 18 $900 Evergreen shrubs #3 $50 12 $600 Phase II - Total cost per dwelling unit: $1,500 28 dwelling units x $1,500 / unit = $42,000 Trees on Common Land Item Size Unit Cost` Quantity Subtotal Trees Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 7 $4,200 Quercus robar'Skymaster' Skymaster English Oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 9 $5,400 Abies ba/samea Balsam Fir 4'-6' height $200 16 $3,200 Picea g/auca White Spruce 4'-6' height $200 13 $2,600 Pinus strobus White Pine 5'-6' height $200 3 $600 Tilia americana American Basswood 2 - 2 112" Cal $475 6 $2,850 Thuja occidentalis 'Nigra' Northern White Cedar 4'-6' height $125 44 $5,500 Phase II - Total Common Land Trees: $24.350 PHASE II TOTAL $66,350 HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Spear Meadow Subdivision Revised 03130117 OBJECTIVES: In order to promote a rich and interesting neighborhood, Snyder Homes adopts the following design guidelines governing the design of homes within the subdivision. REQUIRED DESIGN ELEMENTS: Homes in the Spear Meadow Subdivision must comply with requirements found in the City of South Burlington, Land Development Regulations, Effective: April 11, 2016, Article 9.08, Section C. Residential Design For the purposes of these Guideline, the duplex and triplex buildings shall be considered one building. (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets, see Section 9.11). A minimum of thirty-five percent (35%) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented south. Garages should be located on the northerly side building, allowing southerly orientation of the living space for optimization of solar gain. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. Buildings may have more than one facade that face an immediately adjacent street. In these cases, each fagade shall be designed as a front facade with architectural and/or site elements that are oriented to the street. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings must be set back between ten feet (10') to twenty five (25') from the street right of way (b) Garages shall be set back at least twenty five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk when facing the street (c) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages where the vehicle entrance is parallel to the front building line of a house, the front building line of the garage must be set behind that front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet (8'). The portion of the building nearest the frontline maybe a covered, usable porch, so long as the porch is no less than 8 feet wide. Page 1 of 3 The building width of a single or two family dwelling, not including the garage, shall be no less than 12 feet. For a duplex with side by side primary entries, the building width of each unit in the duplex, not including the garage, shall be no less than 8 feet. The DRB may waive this provision for garages with the vehicle entries facing a side yard, provided that (i) the garage is visually integrated into the main house and (ii) the front building line of the garage is no more than eight feet (8') in front of the front building line of the house. Rear alleys are encouraged for small lot single-family houses, duplexes and townhouses. (5) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.) sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street within neighborhoods rather that compartmentalized into sections of near - identical units. DESIGN CONSTRAINTS: Potential homeowners in the Spear Meadows Subdivision are encouraged to be creative and a wide variety of styles, colors and forms will be allowed. In addition to the minimum legal requirements, the following limits apply: 1. Any given Home Model can be varied by mirroring the plan, changing the color scheme, revising the placement or orientation of the garage, changing the palate of materials or modifying the roof lines. 2. Identical Models (without the variations noted above) may not be constructed on adjoining lots, or facing one another across the street. A given model must change any two of the five variables to be determined sufficiently different. 3. A home's color palate is comprised of its primary siding color, accent siding color, roofing color, trim color and colored accents such as shutters or door and window frames. An identical color palate may not be repeated on adjoining home sites, without regard to Model. No single color palate shall be repeated more than 3 times in the subdivision without variation of one or more of these color variables. 4. Snyder Homes reserves the right to disallow a proposed design if they determine that it fails to comply with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, these design control standards or the overall design intent of the subdivision. 5. Prior to Construction, house plans shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Staff of the City of South Burlington for determination that the proposed home complies with Article 9, Section C of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, and these design control standards. Page 2 of 3 6. Snyder Homes shall maintain a color coded copy of the subdivision plat that shows the Home Model, Color Scheme and any Variations proposed for each lot as they develop. An 11x17 inch color copy of the map shall be included with each home permit application for use by the zoning administrator in checking compliance with these requirements. 7. The decision of the Administrative Officer may be appealed to the Development Review Board within fifteen days (15) of the date the Director's or Administrative Officer's decision is reported to the Development Review Board. Notice of an appeal shall comply with the provisions of 24 VSA, Section 4465. The Development Review Board shall review an appeal in accordance with the standards and procedures applicable to the type of review in question. Page 3 of 3 ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 7:20 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Ray, The Stormwater Section has reviewed the "Spear Meadows" site plan prepared by Lamoureau & Dickinson, last revised on 4/20/17. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwater permit and an operational stormwater permit from the State. 2. The project crosses wetlands in multiple locations and will need a conditional use determination (CUD) from VT DEC. 3. Some of the units back up to the wetland and associated buffer. Use of this buffer area is regulated under section 12.02 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). The DRB should include a condition that this buffer area not be turned into lawn. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, Dave David P. heekr sistant Stormwmter Superintendent Department of public t'6'orl s , �„�+-•. City of South Burhnzon 802) 61i -7961 1 Wit_ 6113 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in inatters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notifv us immediately by return ernail. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Emily Nosse-Leirer [mailto:enosse-leirer@ccrpcvt.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:12 PM To: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com>; Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com>; Terry Francis <tfrancis@sburl.com> Cc: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Hello all, I'm writing to check if any of you have additional comments on the Spear Meadows PUD. In their application materials, the applicant indicated that they had incorporated your comments from the preliminary review. Ray sent along the final application materials on May 24. The hearing is on June 20, so please let Ray and me know if you have any lingering comments/concerns by Friday. Thank you! Emily ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:27 AM To: ray Subject: FW: Spear Meadow - Street lighting Attachments: Sheet 1 L.pdf Ray, I approve of this light fixture for the Spear Meadows project. Justin From: Andy Rowe (mailto:andy@ldengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 2:17 PM To: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com> Cc: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: Spear Meadow - Street lighting Hi Justin — Attached is the Spear Meadow plan sheet showing the proposed street light fixture and locations. The fixture was taken from the specifications that you provided last year. The pole height is 13 feet, as required by the Land Development Regulations for the SEQ. Ray is putting together the staff report for the 6/20 DRB hearing and needs to know if you have any comments on the proposed street lighting. If you have any questions, or would like me to send you the full set of plans (PDF or hard copy), just let me know. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 802.878.4450 1 ray From: Andy Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 3:13 PM To: ray Cc: Chris Snyder Subject: RE: Spear Meadows Attachments: street trees phase 106-14-17.pdf; street trees phase II 06-14-17.pdf Hi Ray — Below are the costs for the street trees and streets/infrastructure by phase. Attached is the detailed street tree cost by phase. Street trees Phase 1 = $55,350 Phase II = $60,800 Streets/Infrastructure Phase 1 = $650,000 Phase II = $850,000 I discussed eliminating the sidewalk along the west side of Vale Drive with Chris Snyder — he has no objection. We will give some additional thought to pedestrian movements from the west side of Vale Drive to sidewalk to remain on the east side of Vale Drive (and the bike path). Please let me know if you need anything else. Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 802.878.4450 From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:20 AM To: Andy Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Subject: Spear Meadows Andy, The DRB will need to include the cost of the street infrastructure and the cost of the street trees in their decision. I cannot find these costs in the material you submitted. Can you please send that information to me as soon as possible? Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com 1 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost - Phase I Street trees June 2017 Item Size Unit Cost Quantity Subtotal Street Trees Acer x treemani 'Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple 2 112" - 3" Cal $600 9 $5,400 Betula nigra 'Heritage' River Birch 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $500 9 $4,500 Acer x freemani 'Sienna Glen' Sienna Glen Maple 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 4 $2,400 Celtis Occidentalis Common Hackberry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 12 $7,200 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Halka' Honeylocust 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 7 $4,200 Nyssa Sylvatica Tupelo 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $650 6 $3,900 Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 17 $10,200 Quercus robar'Skymaster' Skymaster English Oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $650 10 $6,500 Ulmsu americana 'Princeton' jPrinceton American Elm 2 112" - 3" Cal $650 17 $11,050 Total Street Trees: $55,350 Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost - Phase II Street trees June 2017 Item Size Unit Cost Quantity Subtotal Street Trees Acerx freemani Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 12 $7,200 Betula nigra 'Heritage' River Birch 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $500 13 $6,500 Acer x freemani 'Sienna Glen' Sienna Glen Maple 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 7 $4,200 Celtis Occidenta/is Common Hackberry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 21 $12,600 Gleditsia triacanthos 'Halka' Honeylocust 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 18 $10,800 Nyssa Sylvatica Tupelo 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $650 10 $6,500 Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 0 $0 Quercus robar'Skymaster' Skymaster English Oak 2 1/2" 3" Cal $650 11 $7,150 Ulmsu americana 'Princeton' Princeton American Elm 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $650 9 $5,850 Total Street Trees: $60,800 Spear Meadows Lamoreaux and Dickenson 5/11/17 • Would be very helpful to list quantities of each tree species in the plant list • Recommend a substitute for Tupelo, not well suited to site, requires acidic soil and is generally difficult to establish • Recommend substitute for Hackberry, have not had good results planting in clay soils in South Burlington • Sargent Cherry is better suited to use as an ornamental as opposed to a street tree, should be OK for use in island. Generally short lived species • Recommend increasing the number of 'Sienna' Freeman Maple and reducing the number of 'Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple. 'Sienna' has superior structure and has not been planted as commonly. Should also consider 'Celebration' Freeman Maple as it also has superior structure to 'Autumn Blaze' • Accolade Elm is listed in the plant list as an American Elm cultivar it is actually an Asian Elm hybrid • Somme suggested substitute species include but not limited to 'Triumph' and 'Regal Elm', Swamp White Oak, Burr Oak, Amur Maackia(smaller tree) This isn't a landscaping recommendation, but some type of turnaround at the end of dead end streets should be provided for plow trucks otherwise, all the snow from 2 lanes of road will end up in the last driveway on the right Lamoureux Ft Dickinson Engineers Surveyors April 27, 2017 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Department City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Final Plat application Spear Meadows Dear Ray: • Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Group, Inc. to request Final Plat review of the Spear Meadows planned unit development. The Development Review Board granted Preliminary Plat approval on January 18, 2017. In accordance with the Decision, the following information is provided with this application (the numbered items correspond to the numbered items of the Decision): 7. The Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement for the transfer of development rights to Spear Meadows is attached. 8. An application for Wastewater Allocation was submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning on March 29. 10. The Home Design Guidelines have been revised in accordance with items a.-d. The revised Home Design Guidelines are attached. 18.a. The applicant has reached an agreement with the University of Vermont for a watermain easement between the proposed end of Vale Drive and Swift Street. 18.b. The landscape plan has been revised as suggested by the City Arborist. 18.c. The plans have been revised to show a 13 feet high street light (see Sheet 1 L) 18.d. Informational signage has been added near the two wetland crossings (see sheet 1 S). 18.e. A typical rendering of a carriage home with foundation plantings is attached. 18.f. Elevation drawings for units 46 & 47 will be submitted by the applicant. 18.g. Snow storage areas have been identified on sheets 2 & 3. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service www.LDengineering.com 18.h. On April 18 we met with the Water Department to discuss the proposed water supply for the project. In addition, the plans have been revised to reflect the following: - polyethylene wrap has been added to the Typical Water Trench Detail - the Hydrant Detail has been revised to show a 4" stor connection - the Water Service Detail has been revised to show a pentagon nut cap on the curb stop box - notes have been added to sheet 4 regarding the required modifications to the existing water system on Olivia Drive and Nowland Farm Drive 18.i. Revised plans and a letter addressing the comments of the Storwmater Section were sent to Dave Wheeler on April 6. 18.j. The plans include the proposed south bound left turn land on Spear Street. 18k. The landscaping is graphically shown on the Construction Phasing Plan (sheet 2). The landscaping cost estimate has been revised to include the cost for each construction phase. 18.1. No parking signs have been added on the private drive serving the triplex buildings. 19. The proposed E911 addresses are attached. 20. A certificate of title is attached. 21. On April 12, we met with Terry Francis to review the project layout and plans. Following the meeting, the plans were revised to show a wider gravel drive to the sewer pump station and storm pond (opposite unit 1) to accommodate an emergency vehicle turn around. We have enclosed the following for your review: - Final Plat application - $3108 application fee - Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement (TDRs) - Home Design Guidelines - Rendering of a carriage home with foundation plantings - Elevation drawings of units 46 & 47 (to be submitted by applicant) - Landscape cost estimate - Proposed E911 addresses - Certificate of Title - Five full size and one reduced copies of the plans - CD with each document in PDF format Please contact our office with any questions. We look forward to presenting this project to the Development Review Board. Sin Andrew owe P.E. c: Chris Snyder PA2014\1400MCityTinalVinal plat cover letter.wpd 1 Spear Meadows Lamoreaux and Dickenson 5/11/17 • Would be very helpful to list quantities of each tree species in the plant list • Recommend a substitute for Tupelo, not well suited to site, requires acidic soil and is generally difficult to establish • Recommend substitute for Hackberry, have not had good results planting in clay soils in South Burlington • Sargent Cherry is better suited to use as an ornamental as opposed to a street tree, should be OK for use in island. Generally short lived species • Recommend increasing the number of 'Sienna' Freeman Maple and reducing the number of 'Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple. 'Sienna' has superior structure and has not been planted as commonly. Should also consider 'Celebration' Freeman Maple as it also has superior structure to 'Autumn Blaze' • Accolade Elm is listed in the plant list as an American Elm cultivar it is actually an Asian Elm hybrid • Somme suggested substitute species include but not limited to 'Triumph' and 'Regal Elm', Swamp White Oak, Burr Oak, Amur Maackia(smaller tree) This isn't a landscaping recommendation, but some type of turnaround at the end of dead end streets should be provided for plow trucks otherwise, all the snow from 2 lanes of road will end up in the last driveway on the right th-other Paper • otherpapervt.com • June 1, 2017 19 I Paradise in a Container or Garden ears, like this Black Stem 3n be grown in the garden 3lners. PHOTO. LONGFIELD- COM ch as caladiums, coleus, �gonias, trailing sweet ties, and other annuals. leaves of ornamental such as shade tolerant forest grass and sedges, nicely with the elephant I leaves. - ears are tropical plants d warm soil and plenty ire all season long. They y to grow in sun or shade, n hot climates the leaves e protected from midday ilizing every two to three 11 help your plants reach potential. t ears are available as spring -planted bulbs or as potted plants. The baseball -sized tubers can be planted outdoors after all danger of frost has passed and the soil has warmed to at least 65°F. Prepare the soil by adding compost or other organic mat- ter prior to planting. Dig a hole large enough to accommodate the tuber and plant it pointy side up. The top of the tuber should be about an inch below the soil surface. If you live in a cold climate and want to get an early start on the season, plant the tubers in con- tainers filled with well -drained potting mix and grow them in a warm, sunny window for four to six weeks. Move the plants out- doors when the soil is warm and the danger of frost has passed. Visit Longfield-Gardens.com for more information on elephant ear varieties, planting tips and lots of inspiration. Your tropical paradise awaits! Just choose a few containers or locate some spots in the garden where you can include these bold - leafed beauties. Before you know it, you'll be sipping your favorite beverage in your very own tropi- cal garden. By Melinda Myers, author of nu- merous books, including Small Space Gardening. Myers is a col- umnist and contributing editor for Birds & Blooms magazine. For more information, visit www. melindamyers.com. Classifieds a ti b service for South Burlington residents. A -om South Burlington residents for Items for Sale, Free Items, s/es, Wanted Items, Found Items, Lost Items and Vehicles For sill be printed for 2 weeks, free of charge, on a space available Service, Real Estate for Sale by Owner or Real Estate for Rent ,st $20 per week. Ads must be 50 words or less. Make checks ile to The Other Paper and mail to 1340 Williston Road, South aton, VT 05403. Paid ads do not run until payment is received. w,.c i - c e PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON`DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington CityHall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday June 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-17 13 of Josef Lavanway to subdivide a 53,697 sq. ft. lot developed with a single familydwelling into two (2) lots of37,500 sq. ft. (lot #1) and 16,197 sq. ft. Rot#2),1440 Hinesburg Road. 2. Final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: l) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three'(3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10)- 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. June 1, 2017 r; KUBRICKY CONSTRUCTION CORP. KUBRICKY CONSTRUCTION IS GROWING AGAIN. We are looking to fill the following positions for areas all throughout New York State and Vermont: t ads online at www.otherpapersbvt.com, mail to the above ad- dress, or email to classifieds@otherpapersbvt.com. Name, address and phone number are required for residency verification. Spear Meadows April 2017 911 ADDRESS UNIT ADDRESS STREET 1 672 VALE DR 2 658 VALE DR 3 638 VALE DR 4 624 VALE DR 5 610 VALE DR 6 596 VALE DR 7 584 VALE DR 8 570 VALE DR 9 550 VALE DR 10 538 VALE DR 11 526 VALE DR 12 512 VALE DR 13 60 PRIVATE DRIVE B 14 62 PRIVATE DRIVE B 15 64 PRIVATE DRIVE B 16 61 PRIVATE DRIVE B 17 59 PRIVATE DRIVE B 18 51 PRIVATE DRIVE B 19 49 PRIVATE DRIVE B 20 41 PRIVATE DRIVE B 21 39 PRIVATE DRIVE B 22 509 VALE DR 23 511 VALE DR 24 527 VALE DR 25 529 VALE DR 26 543 VALE DR 27 545 VALE DR 28 581 VALE DR 29 583 VALE DR 30 599 VALE DR 31 601 VALE DR 32 136 SPEAR MEADOW RD 33 134 SPEAR MEADOW RD 34 37 STREET'A' 35 39 STREET'A' 36 59 STREET'A' 37 61 STREET'A' 38 50 STREET'A' 39 32 STREET'A' 40 30 STREET'A' 41 14 STREET'A' 42 73 SPEAR MEADOW RD 43 71 SPEAR MEADOW RD SPEAR MEADOW RD SPEAR MEADOW RD H48H18 SPEAR MEADOW RD SPEAR MEADOW RD SPEAR MEADOW RD THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TOREXCAVATION 17 / SC OLLIN$ 9'PAVED PATH IT- \ - i— \\ I �, {,SCONCRETE SIDEWALK IT TOWrvH0U5E .. _ BEN SPACE Q �O EBER \ / I I + / SKIFF \ GRABOYVSILI & MILOT \ ` \ r 1 ` .i ILOrvyECTJ,ON TO PAVEp PATHATB \ 1 , J \.. 'TYPICAL -- _ / •� ORIVE'B� L. \ 164S000B9� _ _ O'PAVEOFATH -11 1 .- _ l _ _ SNGLE FAMILY \f CARRAGE - p ''- I (1T.. ��y- y-BARAJANN 11-l1]0= 1]IY-0 420027� i - - , } '\ I u,�. , yI � I�' 11F� IF IUn / / � \ � • -�, f -, •,' �` '" � L 50 T eE4N Mov \ t Q (/ LOT 48rl IEMO D • I % / I A J�) �. / L -� I h I I TAR.-NT / rl�I ( • (� _ 1�' 1 1 I / �, // i,� •.� I,11? Ituoouu \ • \ TO REMAIN D. MUNR / ~• 1 \ -- M. DENCIiEn, JPPE \ 4 ,/ J 11 �+ +VIA , / - )� / / 01295 I ' _ __- I� --(�_ )-\,J�...r _� _�+-._ 1 - _�_'' /'11- LI � `-- p , \ ;,--h�_,•i- -`� i��•'--__ Ili ;(i ) �T \ (l ' I 1 1 1 y / ' I / ., ` BUILDING SUMMARY / , / 16 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS (3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAv ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - - WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER — EDGE OF WETLAND TREELINE - -- - -- �.- - - - - - EXISTING CONTOUR GRAPHIC SCALE 10. 0 SO 100 200 Am Bn IeN) 1 MCI • ISO M1 SHEETINDEX 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 1L LIGHTING PLAN IS SIGNS & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE & UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE & UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE & UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE 5 PROFILE - SPEAR MEADOW ROAD 6 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE & STREET A 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS- STREETS 11 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - SEWER & STORM 12 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - WATER 13 SEWER PUMP STATION 14 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - EPSC 15 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - STORM PONDS 16 SPEAR STREET TURN LANE PI-1 PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT LANDOWNER GARY N. FARRELL & 1MO SPEAR, LUC 4 SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 130DSPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT OMOO APPLICANT: THE SNYDER GROUP, INC. 4076 SHISBURNE ROAD. SURE 6 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. KEY SOIL MAPPING UNIT HBG k Cr COVINGTON SILTY CLAY D 0. G, & GeB GEORGIA STONY LOAM C 024 LN LIVINGSTON CLAY D 0.49 MnC MASSENA STONY SILTLOAM C 020 V.B VERGENNES CLAY O OAS ZONING DATA TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER-16461340 PROJECT PARCEL AREA- 25.93 ACRES ZONING DISTRICT - SOUh EAST QUADRANT- NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL- NR OVERLAY DISTRICTS- WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER DENSITY: BASE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY • 31 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 12 UNITSIACRE . 31.1 UNITS AVERAGE ALLOWABLE DENSITY =103 UNITS 25.93 ACRES X 4 UNITSIACRE =103.7 UNIT$ PROPOSED DENSITY - 48 UNITS NOTES: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT OF THE PUNNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2. SEE OTHER PUNS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION. 1 04 17 1 REVISE PER CITY PRELIMINARY COMMENTSI OnIONS I MR I THESE PLUS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD 0 OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT ED PRELIMINARY FINAL cl RECORD DRAWING pro} no. SPEAR MEADOWS 1400E wrvey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON D•B1gn OVERALL DABS SITE PLAN DJG 16 LAMOUREUX & DICKIN'SON I AS NOTED Consulting Engineert, Inc. ITL no 14 Morse Ihi,e Essex J... (im VT 05452 Tel: 802-978-4450 'I y r4�) A EV)6V� .:D,s,a 2. This project must be completed as shown on the preliminary plat plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. The applicant must obtain a zoning permit for the first building within six (6) months of this approval. The Development Review Board grants a period of five (5) years for approval of the multi- family buildings. If applicant has not obtained a zoning permit for any of these approved buildings within this five-year period , they will be eligible, per Section 17.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, for one (1) extension to an approval if the application takes place before the approval has expired and if the Development Review Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Development Review Board may specify a period of time up to one (1) year for the extension. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the 32"d dwelling unit, the applicant must record the document entitled, "Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights" and a survey of the area from which the 17 transferable development rights have been severed as required under 24 V.S.A § 4423(b)(4), upon approval of the City Attorney in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use or occupancy of the multi -family dwellings. 6. Future additions of decks, sunrooms, and porches to any single or two-family dwelling units within an approved lot or footprint lot belonging to that unit will require only the issuance of a zoning permit. /Theapplicant must submit legal documents confirming options to purchase the 17 additional development rights for review by the City Attorney with the final plat submission. 8. The applicant must receive preliminary wastewater allocations prior to final plat approval. 9. The applicant must receive final wastewater allocations prior to issuance of any zoning permits. 10. The document entitled, "The Home Design Guidelines Spear Meadow Subdivision" which sets forth the method by which the applicant will comply with the residential design guidelines, must be revised to show the changes below and submitted with the final plat application: tea- . The document must be dated. That duplex and triplex buildings are consider one building for the purposes of the Guidelines. c� Rather than "Buildings should be set back ten feet (10') from the street right of way" the Guidelines will read "Buildings must be set back between ten (10) to twenty-five (25) feet from the street right of way." de, Rather than "Garages shall be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk" the Guidelines will read "Garages shall be set back at least twenty-five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk when facing the street." 11. The Board approves the following waivers: a. Front yard setback of ten (10) feet, provided that garages are setback a minimum of 25 feet if the garage faces the street. b. Rear yard setback of 20 feet for new interior lot lines. IIRV #SD-16-18 c. Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow the clustering of homes. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 13. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 14. There shall be no use of herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers within either the wetlands or the associated buffers. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant must record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 15. There will be no mowing within 50 feet of the wetlands on the property. Brush -hogging will be allowed no more than three (3) times per year. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 16. Any stormwater permit required from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Stormwater Division shall be provided to the Administrative Officer prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. 17. The applicant will be responsible for regularly maintaining all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on -site. 18. The plans must be revised to show the all changes below prior to final plat submission: .a --Remove water line easement located on UVM property ..W" Make changes to landscaping plan as suggested by the City Arborist f.- Update lighting plan to include street lights 12 to 14 feet in height d. Update plans to include informational signage near wetland buffers which explain the role of the wetlands in the health of the community and property e. Provide typical foundation planting type rendering f. Provide elevations for dwelling units #46 and #47 g. Show snow storage areas on plans h. Respond to and resolve issues identified in the comments of the Champlain Water District i. Respond to and resolve issues identified in the comments of the Stormwater Section j. Update plans to include southbound left hand turn lane on Spear Street k. Provide a phasing plan for landscaping with associated budgeted amounts for each phase I. No parking signs must be shown on the private driveway by which the triplexes will be accessed 19 #SD-16-18 19. The final plat submittal must include E911 addresses for structures in the proposed project, in conformance with local ordinances and Vermont E911 addressing standards. 20. The final plat submission must include a Certificate of Title as required under Section 15.17 of the Land Development Regulations. 21. Final plans shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. 22. For the purposes of the Land Development Regulations, all footprint lots will not be recognized as individual lots, which will result in there being seven (7) lots in this PUD. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 23. The final plat application must be submitted within 12 months of this decision. Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain Not Present David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain Not Present John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of 5— 0 — 1. Signed this 18 day of January 2017, by Bill Miller, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.477.2241 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 20 WOR Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 5/24/2017 Comments Due: 6/9/17 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Meeting date: June 20, 2017 Jv south",,:�a�= Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 5/24/17 Comments Due: 6/9/17 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-17-14 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Meeting date: June 20, 2017 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 30th day of May , 20 17, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Final Plat [type of application] # SD-17-14 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See attached list Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 30th day of May , 2017 Printed Name: Andrew Rowe Phone number and email: Andy@LDengineeri o 878- 450 Signature: Andrew Rowe_ Date: May_30. 9017 - Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-1011 l Final Plat Application Spear Meadows Abutter List UVM & State Agricultural College Kathleen Sawtelle 1350 Spear, LLC c/o Campus Planning Services 1300 Spear Street Gary Farrell 109 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05405 South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert & Tammy Avonda B. Grabowski & J. Milot William & Maureen Gilbert 1317 Spear Street 112 Springhouse Road 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Linda Young Richard Tarrant & Tracy Appleton Kenneth Miller 1402 Spear Street 1404 Spear Street 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Muhr Trust Margareta Dencker Pinnacle At Spear HOA 1408 Spear Street P.O. Box 1682 P.O. Box 9481 South Burlington, VT 05403 Olney, MD 20830-1682 South Burlington, VT 05407 John Larkin City of South Burlington Ila Isham Estate 410 Shelburne Road Planning & Zoning Dept 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Thomas & Louise Kleh, Life Estate Michael & Mary Scollins Matt & Emily Bieber 219 Meadowwood Drive 214 Meadowood Drive 26 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jillian Bohlmann Trust William & Tanya Cimonetti Arthur & Thomas Lavigne 31 Vale Drive 1393 Spear Street 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Carlos & Bridget Marroquin Susith Wijetunga 1295 Spear Street Pinnacle at Spear HOA Robert & Marjorie Skiff South Burlington, VT 05403 14 Pinnacle Drive 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Clifford & Kimberly Deetjen Diocese of Vermont 41 Springhouse Road 5 Rock Point Road VT South Burlington, VT 05403 Burlington, 05408 p:\2014\14008\City\Final\Cetti&ate of serviceWbuttersLabels.wpd Spear Meadows April 2017 911 ADDRESS UNIT ADDRESS STREET 1 672 VALE DR 2 658 VALE DR 3 638 VALE DR 4 624 VALE DR 5 610 VALE DR 6 596 VALE DR 7 584 VALE DR 8 570 VALE DR 9 550 VALE DR 10 538 VALE DR 11 526 VALE DR 12 512 VALE DR 13 60 PRIVATE DRIVE B 14 62 PRIVATE DRIVE B 15 64 PRIVATE DRIVE B 16 61 PRIVATE DRIVE B 17 59 PRIVATE DRIVE B 18 51 PRIVATE DRIVE B 19 49 PRIVATE DRIVE B 20 41 PRIVATE DRIVE B 21 39 PRIVATE DRIVE B 22 509 VALE DR 23 511 VALE DR 24 527 VALE DR 25 529 VALE DR 26 543 VALE DR 27 545 VALE DR 28 581 VALE DR 29 583 VALE DR 30 599 VALE DR 31 601 VALE DR 32 136 SPEAR MEADOW RD 33 134 SPEAR MEADOW RD 34 37 STREET'A' 35 39 STREET'A' 36 59 STREET'A' 37 61 STREET'A' 38 50 STREET'A' 39 32 STREET'A' 40 30 STREET'A' 41 14 STREET'A' 42 73 SPEAR MEADOW RD 43 71 SPEAR MEADOW RD 44 41 SPEAR MEADOW RD 45 39 SPEAR MEADOW RD 46 31 SPEAR MEADOW RD 47 29 SPEAR MEADOW RD 48 18 SPEAR MEADOW RD The Snyder Group, Inc. Attn: Mr. Christopher Snyder The Snyder Companies 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company P.O. Box 116 Burlington, VT 05401 Ladies and Gentlemen: April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 [Bank Name and Address] Report on Title to Real Property This is to certify that we have examined the records identified below and made certain inquiries as described below with respect to the record title to the real property known as 1302 Spear Street and described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property') in preparing this Report on Title to Real Property (this "Report"). The examination was conducted at the request of The Snyder Group, Inc. in connection with our request to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company to issue a Commitment for an ALTA Loan Title Insurance Policy on the current form to (the `Bank") and an ALTA Owner's Title Insurance Policy on the current form to The Snyder Group, Inc. The loan policy should insure a mortgage securing a note in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). The owner's policy should be in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). Also see separate Reports on Title for 1340 and 1350 Spear Street. In preparing this Report, we have: Examined the land records which are maintained by the City of South Burlington as indexed in the General Index as required by 24 V.S.A. §§ 1153-1154, 1161 and 1163 and as made available to the public (the "Land Records") with respect to the chain of title to and encumbrances on the Property. 2. Made inquiry of the Zoning Enforcement Officer of the City of South Burlington (the "Zoning Administrator") and reviewed the contents of the files provided to us by the Zoning Administrator in response to our inquiry with respect to the Property (the "Municipal Records"), but only with respect to the following limited matters which may be disclosed in the Municipal Records ("Municipal Zoning Matters"): The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 2 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (a) The dates of the adoption of zoning ordinances applicable to the Property. (b) The requirement, if any, that a zoning permit, building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued under the zoning ordinances which were disclosed to us pursuant to our inquiry with respect to the Property. (c) Whether any notices of violation with respect to the Property had been issued and were not resolved on the date of our inquiry. Reviewed the Land Records for evidence during the Period of the Search (as defined below) that the Property was a part of a "subdivision," as that term is defined in §5-902 of the Vermont Health Regulations or in Section 3.02 of the Environmental Protection Rules or as defined in 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 and the regulations adopted pursuant to such statute, which required the issuance of a State Subdivision Permit and/or was required to have a Public Building Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit on account of construction of improvements on the Property during the period when such regulatory schemes were in effect. Upon discovery of evidence that one or more of such permits were required, we have made inquiry of and, to the extent available, examined the records as indexed in the office of the Regional Engineer, Agency of Natural Resources Essex Junction Regional Office or applicable municipal records in the event of a delegation of authority to the municipality (the "Regional Engineers' Records") with respect to the following limited matters affecting the Property: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a State Subdivision Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1218 (repealed 2002) (the "State Subdivision Regulations"). (b) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Public Building Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1302 and § 1305 (repealed 1987) (the "Public Building Regulations"). (c) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 61 (repealed 2002) (the "Water Supply and Wastewater Regulations"). (d) Whether the property is now or was required to have a Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit under the regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 (adopted 2002) (the "Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Regulations"). (e) If a permit was required under any of the foregoing, then whether such permit was issued and, if issued, whether the terms of the permit required written The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 3 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] certifications or other documents to be filed with the Regional Engineers' office or the municipality. (f) Whether there are notices of violations in the Regional Engineers' Records 4. Reviewed the Land Records and the files maintained by the District Environmental Office (the "District Environmental Office File") for evidence during the Period of the Search that the Property was a part of a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), subject to the limitation expressed below with respect to development activities outside the boundaries of the town or city where the Land Records are maintained and development activities by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14)9 other than the specific persons whose names appear in the chain of title after 1968, with respect to the following limited matters: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 151 (State Land Use and Development Law) ("Act 250"). (b) If an Act 250 permit was required, whether such Act 250 permit was issued. (c) If an Act 250 permit was issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the District Commission. (d) Whether there are notices of violations in the District Environmental Office File. In preparing this Report, we have assumed that the information provided to us by each person of whom we made inquiry was correct and complete at the time it was given to us and did not omit any matter of which such person knew or should have known about from information in the records in such person's control at the time of our inquiry. We have not conducted any separate inspection of the Property nor any review of any records other than the records identified in this Report. This Report is addressed solely to matters affecting record title to the Property. In providing it, we have assumed that at the time of our examination of title, all documents theretofore delivered to the municipal clerk had been correctly and completely indexed and that all oral statements made to us by governmental officials with respect to the status and content of public records were correct and complete. We also have assumed, without independent verification, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authorization of all recorded documents and instruments affecting record title to the Property and the enforceability of all such documents and instruments in accordance with their terms. Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, and subject to the exceptions and limitations set forth below, we hereby report the following: E The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 4 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] Owners of Record. Marketable title to the Property under Subchapter 7 of Chapter 5 of Title 27 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated, subject only to the mortgages, encumbrances, permits and liens described below is vested in Gary N. Farrell. The Property is all and the same land and premises conveyed to Gary N. Farrell by Warranty Deed from Charles M. Hager and Christine S. Hager dated August 2, 2004 and recorded in Volume 677 as Page 402 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "G. N. Farrell' on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). 2. Encumbrances Disclosed by the Land Records. The Property is not subject to encumbrances or liens of record in the Land Records during the Period of the Search, except as follows: (a) Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated August 2, 2004 and recorded in Volume 677 at Page 408 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as modified by Modification of Mortgage from Gary N. Farrell to the Merchants Bank dated October 4, 2005 and recorded in Volume 730 at Page 354 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (b) Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated February 23, 2007 and recorded in Volume 776 at Page 348 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (c) Rights of the public and others legally entitled thereto in any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a public road, way, street or alley. (d) State and municipal permits and/or approvals set forth below in Paragraph 3. 3. Permit Matters. Certain permits and approvals have been issued with respect to approving the creation of a planned unit development, with associated roads and utilities and discussed in a separate Report on Title for property located at 1340 Spear Street. The subdivision of the Property from other land then in common ownership, the construction of improvements on the Property, and the use and occupancy of the improvements on the Property required one or more permits and approvals from municipal or state agencies, commissions, districts or officials. Our research disclosed the following matters: The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 5 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (a) Municipal Zoning Matters. We were advised by the Zoning Administrator that the City of South Burlington adopted its zoning regulations in 1947 and its subdivision regulations in 1963. The subdivision of the Property and the construction of improvements on the Property required municipal approval and the issuance of zoning permits. As a result of our inquiry to the Zoning Administrator regarding permits issued by the City with respect to the Property, the Zoning Administrator provided the following: A zoning file was not found in the office of the City of South Burlington Zoning Office. According to the 2013 Lister's card the single family residence was constructed in 1965. The property is noted on the Lister's card as being "vacant and rundown". We did locate a Certificate of Occupancy issued in 1988 for interior renovations for a home occupancy. We note that any future improvements and alterations to the Property will be subject to the City's zoning regulations. We have not performed a zoning analysis for any future development proposal in connection with this purchase and express no opinion as to whether such permits would be issued or the terms and conditions that may be imposed. The Zoning Administrator has provided a written certification that the Property is not presently in violation of the Zoning Ordinances of the City of South Burlington. A copy is attached hereto. We direct your attention to the limitations and reservations set forth therein. The above description of the Municipal Zoning Matters is for informational purposes only. We direct your attention to the provisions of Act 46 adopted by the Vermont Legislature in May, 1999 and amended in April, 2000 (the "Act") which provides in pertinent part that the failure to obtain or comply with a municipal land use permit (as defined in the Act) does not create an encumbrance on title and does not affect the marketability of title to the Property. See 27 V.S.A. § 612(b). In addition, an enforcement action for a failure to obtain a permit or for a violation of a permit condition that occurred more than 15 years ago is barred by the applicable statute of limitations created under the Act. It is important to note, however, that the failure to obtain a permit or comply with the terms of a permit is still a violation of the applicable municipal ordinances which are enforceable by legal proceedings (except as covered by the statute of limitations set forth above) and may result in the imposition of fines up to One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each violation for each day of the continuing violation. In the event the Property is to be sold, it is likely that a purchase and sale contract will include a provision requiring that the Property be in compliance with municipal and state ordinances, laws, rules and regulations regarding the The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 6 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] use and occupancy of the Property. If the Property does not then comply with such ordinances, laws, rules and regulations, the proposed sale may be delayed or may fail to close. (b) State Subdivision Matters/Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Matters. The Property consists of a lot of land with a single-family residence thereon which was substantially completed prior to January 1, 2007. The boundaries of the Property, the structure thereon and its associated water and wastewater system do not appear to have been altered since January 1, 2007. Therefore, the Property is exempt from the State Subdivision Regulations. See §1-304 of the Environmental Protection Rules. We note that legislation passed on June 13, 2002 (S.27) and on May 18, 2007 (H.296), together with revised Environmental Protection Rules effective on September 29, 2007, modified the State Subdivision Regulations and phased out some prior exemptions. As such, any modifications to the boundary lines for the Property, the structure on the Property, the water and/or sewer demands for the Property or the failure of the wastewater or water systems may require amendments to the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit. We express no opinion as to the capacity of the municipal system to accommodate new sewer flows, the adequacy of future water systems or whether a Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit would be issued in the future and recommend that you consult with a professional engineer to properly evaluate these issues. (c) Stormwater. The Property consists of less than the one acre of impervious coverage required for a stormwater discharge permit. Accordingly, no permanent stormwater discharge permits appear to be required for the Property. See 10 V.S.A. § 1264(d)(1)(D). (d) Act 250 Jurisdiction Matters. See discussion under Section 3(d) of Report on Title for 1340 Spear Street. As the Property is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction by virtue of the above permits, any future improvements on the Property will also be subject to jurisdiction. See In re Russin, 162 Vt. 185, 643 A.2d 1209 (1994) (once jurisdiction attaches, subsequent modifications of the project will not be effective to remove jurisdiction). As such, the construction of improvements on the Property may require an Act 250 Permit Amendment (i.e., if a determination is made that the improvements will be classified as either a substantial or material change to the permitted project). See Environmental Board Rule 34(A) ("[a]n amendment shall The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 7 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] be required for any material or substantial change in a permitted project"). A substantial change is defined as "any change in a development or subdivision which may result in significant impact with respect to any of the criteria specified in 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1) through (a)(10)." See Environmental Board Rule 2(G). A material change is defined as "[a]ny alteration to a project which has a significant impact on any finding, conclusion, term or condition of the project's permit and which affects one or more values sought to be protected by the Act." See Environmental Board Rule 2(P). WE HAVE NO INFORMATION REGARDING POSSIBLE ALTERATIONS TO THE PROPERTY AFTER THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THEREOF OTHER THAN AS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN AND WE STATE NO OPINION AND MAKE NO CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER ALTERATIONS MADE AFTER THE DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED SEPARATE OR ADDITIONAL PERMITS. DISCLAIMER: Except to the extent specifically identified above, the undersigned has not undertaken any investigation whatsoever with respect to whether the Property and each component thereof as originally constructed or subsequently modified, with or without permits, was in compliance with or continues to be in compliance with the provisions of the permits identified above or the applicable laws, rules and regulations, ordinance and orders. The permits identified above include numerous findings of fact, conclusions of law, exhibits, plans and other documents related to and referenced in the permits and the permits contain technical requirements to be satisfied prior to, during and after construction, many of such matters can only be determined by a physical inspection of the Property. The undersigned did not conduct such a physical inspection, nor is such inspection part of the title examiner's obligation. A full review of all those matters requires knowledge and skills in engineering, architecture and other professions outside of the legal profession. The undersigned states no opinion and makes no report or certification with respect to such matters. If you require additional information regarding the permits, or the status of the Property regarding compliance with the permits, you should contact the undersigned or your own counsel to discuss additional procedures and investigations which may be available at extra cost. The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] 4. Other Matters. April 17, 2017 Page 8 (a) No opinion is made as to the existence of any so-called ancient roads which may traverse the Property and could give rise to claims by the public for access over and upon such roadways. Determining the existence of ancient roads would require additional research beyond the Period of the Search and the services of other professionals. Please advise the undersigned if you wish to authorize such additional work In order to facilitate the preparation of Schedule B, Part I of the commitment for title insurance and based on our knowledge of the transaction, we recommend requiring: 1. Discharge of the Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated August 2, 2004 and recorded in Volume 677 at Page 408 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as modified by Modification of Mortgage from Gary N. Farrell to the Merchants Bank dated October 4, 2005 and recorded in Volume 730 at Page 354 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 2. Discharge of the Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated February 23, 2007 and recorded in Volume 776 at Page 348 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Warranty Deed from Gary N. Farrell to The Snyder Group, Inc. or other instrument of conveyance. 4. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return and payment in full of the Vermont Property Transfer Tax due pursuant to 32 V.S.A. §§ 9602, et seq. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the filing requirements of 32 V.S.A. §§ 10001, et seq. relating to the tax on the gain on the sale of real property, if any, as a result of the transfer of the Property. 6. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the requirements of 32 V.S.A. § 5847 relating to withholding on the sale or exchange of real property for non-residents or delivery of a certificate establishing that the transfer of the Property is exempt from such provisions, or other evidence that 32 V.S.A. § 5847 is not applicable. 7. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with 26 U.S.C. § 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to withholding of tax on dispositions of United States real property interests by foreign persons, or delivery of satisfactory evidence that the transfer of the Property is exempt from 26 U.S.C. § 1445. J The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] 8. Mortgage Deed from The Snyder Group, Inc. to In addition, we direct your attention to the following: April 17, 2017 Page 9 Taxes for the year July 1, 2016 through July 1, 2017 in the total amount of $8,065.68 are due in three installments on August 15, 2016, November 15, 2016 and March 15, 2017 (copy of tax bill attached hereto). There are no delinquent taxes of record. 2. The Property is not occupied as the seller's residence and based on our review of the City of South Burlington Grand List, the seller did not file a Homestead Declaration. Our examination of the Land Records covered the period from May 22, 1959 and August 21, 1972 through April 17, 2017 at 8:00 in the forenoon (the "Period of the Search"). In preparing this Report, we have not examined or inquired into nor do we state any opinion or make any certification regarding the following, except to the extent specifically addressed above: Taxes or assessments against the Property, if any, currently or hereafter assessed (none of which are delinquent on the date hereof, unless noted above). 2. Any instrument recorded prior or subsequent to the period of examination specified in this Report. 3. The application or effect of any laws, ordinances, bylaws, rules, regulations or plans of the United States, the State of Vermont or any subdivisions, agencies or departments thereof relating to zoning or environmental matters; or whether the Property contains or is located within an area designated as a federal flood hazard zone, a wetland or public waters. 4. Matters which would be disclosed by a physical examination, environmental audit or an accurate survey of the Property, including in particular public highway easements, easements appurtenant to adjacent lands arising from any subdivision of lands without provision for adequate access thereto, the availability or adequacy of public or private utilities and services or the description or physical location of the boundaries of the Property. Rights of tenants and others in possession of all or any portion of the Property. 6. Any untrue, inaccurate or misleading statements contained or referred to in any recorded documents or public records. 7. Matters contained in records of probates, bankruptcy or other courts; the records of births, marriages, divorces or deaths; or the records of the formation, existence, The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 10 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] registration or status of any entity which is a party to any document affecting the title to the Property. The status of lease land rents. 9. Rights claimed in lands and premises forming the alleged homelands of certain American Indian or indian tribes and nations including, but not limited to, the Abenaki Indian Nation arising out of aboriginal rights. The Property may be part of the lands claimed. Claims have been made to certain lands and premises in northern and western Vermont, but the rights of the claimants have not been finally adjudicated. 10. The effect of any activities which could or might result in forfeiture of a right, title and interest in the premises to the United States of America for any violation under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Control Act of 1970, as amended, or to any other party pursuant to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraudulent conveyances or similar laws. 11. The potential application of the Vermont Land Use and Development Law (10 V.S.A. Ch. 151) and the Environmental Protection Rules to the Property by reason of activity constituting a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), resulting in: (a) the creation of ten or more lots within any continuous period of five years by a person other than the specifically identified persons appearing in the chain of title to the Property; (b) the creation of lots by any person identified in the chain of title which are located in any town other than the town where the Property is located; or (c) any other basis for a claim of jurisdiction by the Environmental Board based on the activities of any person other than a person specifically named in the chain of title to the Property. 12. The contents of or effect of records which existed at the time of our inquiry directed to the governmental officials named above which were not filed in the official file kept by such government officials regarding the Property at the time of our inquiry. This Report is solely for your benefit, is not transferable and is not for the use or benefit of any other person or entity, nor for use in connection with any transaction other than that described above. Very truly yours, GRAVEL & SHEA PC Robert H. Rushford Exhibit A A certain piece or parcel of land, with the improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto, located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Gary N. Farrell by Warranty Deed from Charles M. Hager and Christine S. Hager dated August 2, 2004 and recorded in Volume 677 as Page 402 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "G. N. Farrell' on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is also subject to: (a) the provisions of municipal ordinances, public laws, and special acts; and (b) all easements and rights of way of record, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. § 601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. <122296M/RHRw E The Snyder Group, Inc. Attn: Mr. Christopher Snyder The Snyder Companies 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company P.O. Box 116 Burlington, VT 05401 Ladies and Gentlemen: April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 [Bank Name and Address] Report on Title to Real Property This is to certify that we have examined the records identified below and made certain inquiries as described below with respect to the record title to the real property known as 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont and described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property") in preparing this Report on Title to Real Property (this "Report"). The examination was conducted at the request of The Snyder Group, Inc. in connection with our request to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company to issue a Commitment for an ALTA Loan Title Insurance Policy on the current form to (the "Bank") and an ALTA Owner's Title Insurance Policy on the current form to The The Snyder Group, Inc. The loan policy should insure a mortgage securing a note in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). The owner's policy should be in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). Also see separate Reports on Title for 1302 Spear Street and 1350 Spear Street. In preparing this Report, we have: Examined the land records which are maintained by the City of South Burlington as indexed in the General Index as required by 24 V.S.A. §§ 1153-1154, 1161 and 1163 and as made available to the public (the "Land Records") with respect to the chain of title to and encumbrances on the Property. 2. Made inquiry of the Zoning Enforcement Officer of the City of South Burlington (the "Zoning Administrator") and reviewed the contents of the files provided to us by the Zoning Administrator in response to our inquiry with respect to the Property (the "Municipal Records"), but only with respect to the following limited matters which may be disclosed in the Municipal Records ("Municipal Zoning Matters"): (a) The dates of the adoption of zoning ordinances applicable to the Property. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 2 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (b) The requirement, if any, that a zoning permit, building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued under the zoning ordinances which were disclosed to us pursuant to our inquiry with respect to the Property. (c) Whether any notices of violation with respect to the Property had been issued and were not resolved on the date of our inquiry. 3. Reviewed the Land Records for evidence during the Period of the Search (as defined below) that the Property was a part of a "subdivision," as that term is defined in §5-902 of the Vermont Health Regulations or in Section 3.02 of the Environmental Protection Rules or as defined in 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 and the regulations adopted pursuant to such statute, which required the issuance of a State Subdivision Permit and/or was required to have a Public Building Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit on account of construction of improvements on the Property during the period when such regulatory schemes were in effect. Upon discovery of evidence that one or more of such permits were required, we have made inquiry of and, to the extent available, examined the records as indexed in the office of the Regional Engineer, Agency of Natural Resources Essex Junction Regional Office or applicable municipal records in the event of a delegation of authority to the municipality (the "Regional Engineers' Records") with respect to the following limited matters affecting the Property: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a State Subdivision Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1218 (repealed 2002) (the "State Subdivision Regulations"). (b) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Public Building Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1302 and § 1305 (repealed 1987) (the "Public Building Regulations"). (c) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 61 (repealed 2002) (the "Water Supply and Wastewater Regulations'). (d) Whether the property is now or was required to have a Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit under the regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 (adopted 2002) (the "Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Regulations"). (e) If a permit was required under any of the foregoing, then whether such permit was issued and, if issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the Regional Engineers' office or the municipality. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 3 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (f) Whether there are notices of violations in the Regional Engineers' Records. 4. Reviewed the Land Records and the files maintained by the District Environmental Office (the "District Environmental Office File") for evidence during the Period of the Search that the Property was a part of a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), subject to the limitation expressed below with respect to development activities outside the boundaries of the town or city where the Land Records are maintained and development activities by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), other than the specific persons whose names appear in the chain of title after 1968, with respect to the following limited matters: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 151 (State Land Use and Development Law) ("Act 250"). (b) If an Act 250 permit was required, whether such Act 250 permit was issued. (c) If an Act 250 permit was issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the District Commission. (d) Whether there are notices of violations in the District Environmental Office File. In preparing this Report, we have assumed that the information provided to us by each person of whom we made inquiry was correct and complete at the time it was given to us and did not omit any matter of which such person knew or should have known about from information in the records in such person's control at the time of our inquiry. We have not conducted any separate inspection of the Property nor any review of any records other than the records identified in this Report. This Report is addressed solely to matters affecting record title to the Property. In providing it, we have assumed that at the time of our examination of title, all documents theretofore delivered to the municipal clerk had been correctly and completely indexed and that all oral statements made to us by governmental officials with respect to the status and content of public records were correct and complete. We also have assumed, without independent verification, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authorization of all recorded documents and instruments affecting record title to the Property and the enforceability of all such documents and instruments in accordance with their terms. Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, and subject to the exceptions and limitations set forth below, we hereby report the following: 1. Owners of Record. Marketable title to the Property under Subchapter 7 of Chapter 5 of Title 27 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated, subject only to the mortgages, encumbrances, permits and liens described below is vested in Spear Meadows, Inc. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 4 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] The Property is a portion of the same land and premises conveyed by Warranty Deed from Karen F. Maklad (nee Farrell), Brent N. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole (nee Farrell) and Kevin J. Farrell to Spear Meadows, Inc. dated March 31, 2006 and recorded in Volume 747 at Page 653 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "Undeveloped Lands, 1340 Spear Street" on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). The Property has the benefit of an Easement Deed from Doug J. Franzoni and Christine C. Franzoni to Spear Meadows, Inc. dated June 3, 2015 and recorded in Volume 1271 at Page 25 of the City of South Burlington Land Records for ingress, egress, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a sewer line as depicted on the Plat. 2. Encumbrances Disclosed by the Land Records. The Property is not subject to encumbrances or liens of record in the Land Records during the Period of the Search, except as follows: (a) Mortgage Deed from Karen A. Maklad (f/k/a Karen A. Farrell), Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole and Brent N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated November 23, 2004 and recorded in Volume 691 at Page 617 of the City of South Burlington Land Records as modified by Modification of Mortgage between Karen F. Maklad (f/k/a Karen A. Farrell) Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole and Brent N. Farrell and Merchants Bank dated October 4, 2005 and recorded in Volume 730 at Page 737 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is also made to Affidavit of Witness and Notary of Laura Walker dated April 15, 2005 and recorded in Volume 709 at Page 557 of the City of South Burlington Land Records relating to the Mortgage Deed referenced above. (b) Mortgage deed from Spear Meadows, Inc. to Merchants Bank dated February 23, 2007 and recorded in Volume 776 at Page 355 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (c) A portion of the Property may be subject to glebe land rents as described in Warranty Deed from John Reid and Esther F. Reid to Gardner Hopwood and Beverly E. Hopwood dated June 30, 1967 and recorded in Volume 85 at Page 323 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (d) A portion of the Property may be subject to water rights as described in Warranty Deed from John Reid and Esther F. Reid to Gardner Hopwood and Beverly E. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 5 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] Hopwood dated June 30, 1967 and recorded in Volume 85 at Page 323 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (e) Rights of the public and others legally entitled to any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a stream, watercourse or protected wetland. (f) Rights of the public and others legally entitled thereto in any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a public road, way, street or alley. (g) State and municipal permits and/or approvals set forth below in Paragraph 3. 3. Permit Matters. Certain permits and approvals have been issued with respect to approving the creation of a planned unit development, with associated roads and utilities. The subdivision of the Property from other land then in common ownership, the construction of improvements on the Property, and the use and occupancy of the improvements on the Property required one or more permits and approvals from municipal or state agencies, commissions, districts or officials. Our research disclosed the following matters: (a) Municipal Zoning Matters. We were advised by the Zoning Administrator that the City of South Burlington adopted its zoning regulations in 1947 and its subdivision regulations in 1963. The subdivision of the Property and the construction of improvements on the Property required municipal approval and the issuance of zoning permits. As a result of our inquiry to the Zoning Administrator regarding permits issued by the City with respect to the Property, the Zoning Administrator provided the following: We note that since 2005 the City of South Burlington reviewed several proposed Subdivision applications and/or Planned Unit Development applications which were never acted upon. The following are the most recent approvals granted by the City of South Burlington: (i) City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning administrative approval for minor lot line adjustment application No. AD- 11-01 as evidenced by Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 27, 2011 for a boundary line adjustment between 1340, 1404 and 1406 Spear Street and as depicted on the Plat. Reference is made to Warranty Deed from Spear Meadows, Inc. to Doug J. Franzoni and Christine C. Franzoni dated June 3, 2015 and recorded in Volume 1271 at Page 23 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. We note that the boundary line adjustment approved on property owned by Rich and Tracy Tarrant does not appear to have been created by conveyance. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 6 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (ii) City of South Burlington Development Review Board approved Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 as evidenced by Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 for the creation of a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: razing one (1) single family dwelling, constructing 18 single family dwellings, constructing (3) 3-unit multi- family dwellings, and constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings at 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street. Reference is made to correspondence of Andrew Rowe, P.E. dated March 13, 2017 which states that the plan has been revised in accordance with Condition 5a of the Decision which required that the plan page titled "Master Plan" be updated to show the proposed path and sidewalk easements. (iii) City of South Burlington Development Review Board approved Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 as evidenced by Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 for a planned unit on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: razing one (1) single family dwelling, constructing 18 single family dwellings, constructing (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings at 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street. Condition #2 of the approval requires the project be completed as shown on the preliminary plat plans. Condition #3 requires a zoning permit be obtained for the first building within six (6) months of the approval. Condition #4 requires that prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the 32°a dwelling unit, the applicant must record a "Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights" and a survey of the area from which the 17 transferable development rights have been severed as required under 24 V.S.A. §4423(b)(4), upon approval of the City Attorney in the South Burlington Land Records. Pursuant to Condition #14, prior to a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant must record a Notice of Conditions approved by the City Attorney stating that no herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers may be placed within either the wetland or the associated buffers. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 7 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] Pursuant to Condition #15, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building, the applicant must record a Notice of Conditions approved by the City Attorney that no mowing shall be permitted within 50 feet of the wetlands on the Property. Condition #16 requires that any stormwater permit required from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Stormwater Division shall be provided to the Administrative Officer prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. Condition #22 requires that, prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant will be required to record a Notice of Conditions which has been approved by the City Attorney that for purposes of zoning (density) compliance, the footprint lots will not be recognized as individual lots, which will result in there being seven (7) lots in this PUD. Reference is made to all conditions contained in the Decision of the Development Review Board. We note that an appeal of the Project was filed with the State of Vermont, Superior Court, Environmental Division on February 16, 2017. We express no opinion as to the outcome of the appeal. We also note that any future improvements and alterations to the Property will be subject to the City's zoning regulations. We have not performed a zoning analysis for any future development proposal in connection with this purchase and express no opinion as to whether such permits would be issued or the terms and conditions that may be imposed. The Zoning Administrator has provided a written certification that the Property is not presently in violation of the Zoning Ordinances of the City of South Burlington. A copy is attached hereto. We direct your attention to the limitations and reservations set forth therein. The above description of the Municipal Zoning Matters is for informational purposes only. We direct your attention to the provisions of Act 46 adopted by the Vermont Legislature in May, 1999 and amended in April, 2000 (the "Act") which provides in pertinent part that the failure to obtain or comply with a municipal land use permit (as defined in the Act) does not create an encumbrance on title and does not affect the marketability of title to the Property. See 27 V.S.A. § 612(b). In addition, an enforcement action for a failure to obtain a permit or for a violation of a permit condition that occurred more than 15 years ago is barred by the applicable statute of The The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] April 17, 2017 Page 8 limitations created under the Act. It is important to note, however, that the failure to obtain a permit or comply with the terms of a permit is still a violation of the applicable municipal ordinances which are enforceable by legal proceedings (except as covered by the statute of limitations set forth above) and may result in the imposition of fines up to One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each violation for each day of the continuing violation. In the event the Property is to be sold, it is likely that a purchase and sale contract will include a provision requiring that the Property be in compliance with municipal and state ordinances, laws, rules and regulations regarding the use and occupancy of the Property. If the Property does not then comply with such ordinances, laws, rules and regulations, the proposed sale may be delayed or may fail to close. (b) State Subdivision Matters/Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Matters. The boundaries of the parcel were created by conveyance in 1979 with the merging of two lots with one lot consisting of a parcel of land greater than ten (10) acres in size and, therefore, does not appear to fall within the definition of a subdivision under the Environmental Protection Rules in effect at the time the lot was created. See Rule 3.02(D) of the former Environmental Rules ("[w]hen subdivision creates a retained lot of ten acres or larger in size, approval of the retained lot is not required"). Accordingly, the Property appears to fall under the definition of an `Existing Exempt Lot" under Section 1-201(a)(23)(C) of the 2005 Environmental Protection Rules. A boundary line adjustment between Spear Meadows, Inc. Richard E. Tarrant, Jr. and Tracy A. Tarrant and Douglas and Christine Franzoni as depicted on the Plat was determined to be exempt under Section 1-304-(a)(11) of the Environmental Protection Rules as evidenced by correspondence from Jessanne Wyman, Regional Engineer of the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Public Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division dated September 12, 2014 and recorded in Volume 1243 at Page 92 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. We note that legislation passed on June 13, 2002 (S.27) and on May 18, 2007 (H.296), together with revised Environmental Protection Rules effective on September 29, 2007, modified the State Subdivision Regulations and phased out some prior exemptions. As such, any modifications to the boundary lines for the Property, the structure on the Property, the water and/or sewer demands for the Property or the failure of the wastewater or water systems may require amendments to the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit. We express no opinion as to the capacity of the municipal system to accommodate new sewer flows, the adequacy of future water systems or whether a Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit would be issued in the future and The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 9 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] recommend that you consult with a professional engineer to properly evaluate these issues. (c) Stormwater. The Property consists of less than the one acre of impervious coverage required for a stormwater discharge permit. Accordingly, no permanent stormwater discharge permits appear to be required for the Property. See 10 V.S.A. § 1264(d)(1)(D). A stormwater permit will be required for the projection. We express no opinion as to the ability to obtain a permit and recommend consulting with a professional engineer to properly evaluate the issues. (d) Act 250 Jurisdiction Matters. (i) Spear Meadows, LLC filed application #4C1173 as evidenced by Act 250 Notice Application and Hearing #4C 1173 dated March 15, 2006 for the subdivision of three existing parcels totaling 26.2 acres, into 18 new single family lots, one existing single family residence and a multi- family lot for 12 duplex units including the construction of"a new 2,300 foot public access road to connect Vale Drive to Spear Street and a new 1,000 foot road and cul de sac serving the multi -family lot. See also Project Review Sheet dated April 5, 2006. The application was later withdrawn as evidenced by Memo from Eric Farrell dated October 11, 2006. (ii) Memorandum of Decision and Order was granted for Application 4C1173-1 on October 30, 2008 authorizing an off -site mitigation agreement with the State of Vermont Agency of Agriculture for the 23.23 acres of Primary Agricultural soils. As the Property is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction by virtue of the above permits, any future improvements on the Property will also be subject to jurisdiction. See In re Russin, 162 Vt. 185, 643 A.2d 1209 (1994) (once jurisdiction attaches, subsequent modifications of the project will not be effective to remove jurisdiction). As such, the construction of improvements on the Property may require an Act 250 Permit Amendment (i.e., if a determination is made that the improvements will be classified as either a substantial or material change to the permitted project). See Environmental Board Rule 34(A) ("[a]n amendment shall be required for any material or substantial change in a permitted project"). A substantial change is defined as "any change in a development or subdivision which may result in significant impact with respect to any of the criteria specified in 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1) through (a)(10)." See Environmental Board Rule 2(G). A material change is defined as "[a]ny alteration to a project which has a significant impact on any finding, conclusion, term or condition of the project's The The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] April 17, 2017 Page 10 permit and which affects one or more values sought to be protected by the Act." See Environmental Board Rule 2(P). WE HAVE NO INFORMATION REGARDING POSSIBLE ALTERATIONS TO THE PROPERTY AFTER THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THEREOF OTHER THAN AS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN AND WE STATE NO OPINION AND MAKE NO CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER ALTERATIONS MADE AFTER THE DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED SEPARATE OR ADDITIONAL PERMITS. DISCLAIMER: Except to the extent specifically identified above, the undersigned has not undertaken any investigation whatsoever with respect to whether the Property and each component thereof as originally constructed or subsequently modified, with or without permits, was in compliance with or continues to be in compliance with the provisions of the permits identified above or the applicable laws, rules and regulations, ordinance and orders. The permits identified above include numerous findings of fact, conclusions of law, exhibits, plans and other documents related to and referenced in the permits and the permits contain technical requirements to be satisfied prior to, during and after construction, many of such matters can only be determined by a physical inspection of the Property. The undersigned did not conduct such a physical inspection, nor is such inspection part of the title examiner's obligation. A full review of all those matters requires knowledge and skills in engineering, architecture and other professions outside of the legal profession. The undersigned states no opinion and makes no report or certification with respect to such matters. If you require additional information regarding the permits, or the status of the Property regarding compliance with the permits, you should contact the undersigned or your own counsel to discuss additional procedures and investigations which may be available at extra cost. (e) Other Permits. State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Conditional Use Determination, Section 8 — Vermont Wetlands Rules File #2004-489 Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated June 6, 2006 was issued for the construction of two access road crossings to serve a 19-lot residential subdivision which will impact 3,864 square feet of Class Two wetland and 21,298 square feet of the 50- foot buffer zone. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 11 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] 4. Other Matters. (a) Notice of Option between Leduc Farm, Inc. and Spear Meadows, Inc. dated February 1, 2009 and recorded in Volume 837 at Page 225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records as amended by Amendment to Option Agreement and Notice of Option between Leduc Farm, Inc., Spear Meadows, Inc. and Maurice Leduc and Mary Lou Leduc dated September 16, 2009 and recorded in Volume 894 at Page 90 of the City of South Burlington Land Records as amended by Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement between Vermont Land Trust, Inc. and Spear Meadows, Inc. dated December 21, 2012 and recorded in Volume 1131 at Page 235 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as amended by Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement dated February 11, 2015 and recorded in Volume 1254 at Page 97 of the City of South Burlington Land Records for the purpose of acquiring TDRs from Leduc's Property, for a minimum of twenty-five (25) units and up to a maximum of fifty-six (56) units of density, for transfer and application to Spear Meadows, Inc. Property, pursuant to Article 9, Section 9.13(c)(1)(a) of the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations in connection with a planned residential development on the Property. Reference is also made to Warranty Deed from Leduc Farm, Inc. to Vermont Land Trust, Inc. dated September 30, 2009 and recorded in Volume 896 at Page 228 of the City of South Burlington Land Records where option was assigned. (b) No opinion is made as to the existence of any so-called ancient roads which may traverse the Property and could give rise to claims by the public for access over and upon such roadways. Determining the existence of ancient roads would require additional research beyond the Period of the Search and the services of other professionals. Please advise the undersigned if you wish to authorize such additional work. In order to facilitate the preparation of Schedule B, Part I of the commitment for title insurance and based on our knowledge of the transaction, we recommend requiring: 1. Discharge of the Mortgage Deed from Karen A. Maklad (f/k/a Karen A. Farrell), Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole and Brent N. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated February 23, 2007 and recorded in Volume 776 at Page 355 of the City of South Burlington Land Records as modified by Modification of Mortgage between Karen F. Maklad (f/k/a Karen A. Farrell) Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole and Brent N. Farrell and Merchants Bank dated October 4, 2005 and recorded in Volume 730 at Page 737 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 12 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] 2. Discharge of the Mortgage deed from Spear Meadows, Inc. to Merchants Bank dated February 23, 2007 and recorded in Volume 776 at Page 355 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Warranty Deed from Spear Meadows, Inc. to The Snyder Group, Inc. or other instrument of conveyance. 4. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return and payment in full of the Vermont Property Transfer Tax due pursuant to 32 V.S.A. §§ 9602, et seq. 5. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the filing requirements of 32 V.S.A. §§ 10001, et seq. relating to the tax on the gain on the sale of real property, if any, as a result of the transfer of the Property. 6. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the requirements of 32 V.S.A. § 5847 relating to withholding on the sale or exchange of real property for non-residents or delivery of a certificate establishing that the transfer of the Property is exempt from such provisions, or other evidence that 32 V.S.A. § 5847 is not applicable. 7. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with 26 U.S.C. § 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to withholding of tax on dispositions of United States real property interests by foreign persons, or delivery of satisfactory evidence that the transfer of the Property is exempt from 26 U.S.C. § 1445. Presentation to the undersigned of evidence satisfactory to the undersigned of the authority of the agent executing the Warranty Deed referred to in Items 3 above to make, execute and deliver such Warranty Deed. 9. Mortgage Deed from The Snyder Group, Inc. to In addition, we direct your attention to the following: 1. Taxes for the year July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the total amount of $9,614.34 due in three installments on August 15, 2016, November 15, 2016 and March 15, 2017 (copy of tax bill attached hereto). There are no delinquent taxes of record. 2. The Property is not occupied as the seller's residence and based on our review of the City of South Burlington Grand List, the seller did not file a Homestead Declaration. Our examination of the Land Records covered the period from August 7, 1967 through April 17, 2017 at 8:00 in the forenoon (the "Period of the Search"). The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 13 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] In preparing this Report, we have not examined or inquired into nor do we state any opinion or make any certification regarding the following, except to the extent specifically addressed above: 1. Taxes or assessments against the Property, if any, currently or hereafter assessed (none of which are delinquent on the date hereof, unless noted above). 2. Any instrument recorded prior or subsequent to the period of examination specified in this Report. 3. The application or effect of any laws, ordinances, bylaws, rules, regulations or plans of the United States, the State of Vermont or any subdivisions, agencies or departments thereof relating to zoning or environmental matters; or whether the Property contains or is located within an area designated as a federal flood hazard zone, a wetland or public waters. 4. Matters which would be disclosed by a physical examination, environmental audit or an accurate survey of the Property, including in particular public highway easements, easements appurtenant to adjacent lands arising from any subdivision of lands without provision for adequate access thereto, the availability or adequacy of public or private utilities and services or the description or physical location of the boundaries of the Property. 5. Rights of tenants and others in possession of all or any portion of the Property. 6. Any untrue, inaccurate or misleading statements contained or referred to in any recorded documents or public records. Matters contained in records of probates, bankruptcy or other courts; the records of births, marriages, divorces or deaths; or the records of the formation, existence, registration or status of any entity which is a party to any document affecting the title to the Property. The status of lease land rents. 9. Rights claimed in lands and premises forming the alleged homelands of certain American Indian or indian tribes and nations including, but not limited to, the Abenaki Indian Nation arising out of aboriginal rights. The Property may be part of the lands claimed. Claims have been made to certain lands and premises in northern and western Vermont, but the rights of the claimants have not been finally adjudicated. 10. The effect of any activities which could or might result in forfeiture of a right, title and interest in the premises to the United States of America for any violation under the The The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 14 Commonwealth Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Control Act of 1970, as amended, or to any other party pursuant to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraudulent conveyances or similar laws. 11. The potential application of the Vermont Land Use and Development Law (10 V.S.A. Ch. 151) and the Environmental Protection Rules to the Property by reason of activity constituting a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), resulting in: (a) the creation of ten or more lots within any continuous period of five years by a person other than the specifically identified persons appearing in the chain of title to the Property; (b) the creation of lots by any person identified in the chain of title which are located in any town other than the town where the Property is located; or (c) any other basis for a claim of jurisdiction by the Environmental Board based on the activities of any person other than a person specifically named in the chain of title to the Property. 12. The contents of or effect of records which existed at the time of our inquiry directed to the governmental officials named above which were not filed in the official file kept by such government officials regarding the Property at the time of our inquiry. This Report is solely for your benefit, is not transferable and is not for the use or benefit of any other person or entity, nor for use in connection with any transaction other than that described above. Very truly yours, GRAVEL & SHEA PC Robert H. Rushford Exhibit A A certain piece or parcel of land, with the improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto, located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed by Warranty Deed from Karen F. Maklad (nee Farrell), Brent N. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole (nee Farrell) and Kevin J. Farrell to Spear Meadows, Inc. dated March 31, 2006 and recorded in Volume 747 at Page 653 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "Undeveloped Lands, 1340 Spear Street" on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records the Plat. The Property has the benefit of an Easement Deed from Doug J. Franzoni and Christine C. Franzoni to Spear Meadows, Inc. dated June 3, 2015 and recorded in Volume 1271 at Page 25 of the City of South Burlington Land Records for ingress, egress, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a sewer line as depicted on the Plat. The Property is also subject to: (a) the provisions of municipal ordinances, public laws, and special acts; and (b) all easements and rights of way of record, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. § 601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. The Snyder Group, Inc. Attn: Mr. Christopher Snyder The Snyder Companies 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company P.O. Box 116 Burlington, VT 05401 Ladies and Gentlemen: April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 [Bank Name and Address] Report on Title to Real Property This is to certify that we have examined the records identified below and made certain inquiries as described below with respect to the record title to the real property known as 1350 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont and described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property") in preparing this Report on Title to Real Property (this "Report"). The examination was conducted at the request of The Snyder Group, Inc., in connection with our request to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company to issue a Commitment for an ALTA Loan Title Insurance Policy on the current form to (the "Bank") and an ALTA Owner's Title Insurance Policy on the current form to The Snyder Group, Inc. The loan policy should insure a mortgage securing a note in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). The owner's policy should be in the amount of and _/100 Dollars ($ .00). Also see separate Reports on Title for 1302 Spear Street and 1340 Spear Street. In preparing this Report, we have: Examined the land records which are maintained by the City of South Burlington as indexed in the General Index as required by 24 V.S.A. §§ 1153-1154, 1161 and 1163 and as made available to the public (the "Land Records") with respect to the chain of title to and encumbrances on the Property. 2. Made inquiry of the Zoning Enforcement Officer of the City of South Burlington (the "Zoning Administrator") and reviewed the contents of the files provided to us by the Zoning Administrator in response to our inquiry with respect to the Property (the "Municipal Records"), but only with respect to the following limited matters which may be disclosed in the Municipal Records ("Municipal Zoning Matters"): (a) The dates of the adoption of zoning ordinances applicable to the Property. The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 2 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (b) The requirement, if any, that a zoning permit, building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued under the zoning ordinances which were disclosed to us pursuant to our inquiry with respect to the Property. (c) Whether any notices of violation with respect to the Property had been issued and were not resolved on the date of our inquiry. Reviewed the Land Records for evidence during the Period of the Search (as defined below) that the Property was a part of a "subdivision," as that term is defined in §5-902 of the Vermont Health Regulations or in Section 3.02 of the Environmental Protection Rules or as defined in 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 and the regulations adopted pursuant to such statute, which required the issuance of a State Subdivision Permit and/or was required to have a Public Building Permit or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit on account of construction of improvements on the Property during the period when such regulatory schemes were in effect. Upon discovery of evidence that one or more of such permits were required, we have made inquiry of and, to the extent available, examined the records as indexed in the office of the Regional Engineer, Agency of Natural Resources Essex Junction Regional Office or applicable municipal records in the event of a delegation of authority to the municipality (the "Regional Engineers' Records") with respect to the following limited matters affecting the Property: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a State Subdivision Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1218 (repealed 2002) (the "State Subdivision Regulations"). (b) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Public Building Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 18 V.S.A. § 1302 and § 1305 (repealed 1987) (the "Public Building Regulations"). (c) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit under the former regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 61 (repealed 2002) (the "Water Supply and Wastewater Regulations"). (d) Whether the property is now or was required to have a Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit under the regulations adopted pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 64 (adopted 2002) (the "Potable Water Supply and Wastewater S, stem Regulations"). (e) If a permit was required under any of the foregoing, then whether such permit was issued and, if issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the Regional Engineers' office or the municipality. The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 3 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] (f) Whether there are notices of violations in the Regional Engineers' Records. 4. Reviewed the Land Records and the files maintained by the District Environmental Office (the "District Environmental Office File") for evidence during the Period of the Search that the Property was a part of a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), subject to the limitation expressed below with respect to development activities outside the boundaries of the town or city where the Land Records are maintained and development activities by any "person," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), other than the specific persons whose names appear in the chain of title after 1968, with respect to the following limited matters: (a) Whether the Property is now or was required to have a permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chap. 151 (State Land Use and Development Law) ("Act 250"). (b) If an Act 250 permit was required, whether such Act 250 permit was issued. (c) If an Act 250 permit was issued, whether the terms of the permit required written certifications or other documents to be filed with the District Commission. (d) Whether there are notices of violations in the District Environmental Office File. In preparing this Report, we have assumed that the information provided to us by each person of whom we made inquiry was correct and complete at the time it was given to us and did not omit any matter of which such person knew or should have known about from information in the records in such person's control at the time of our inquiry. We have not conducted any separate inspection of the Property nor any review of any records other than the records identified in this Report. This Report is addressed solely to matters affecting record title to the Property. In providing it, we have assumed that at the time of our examination of title, all documents theretofore delivered to the municipal clerk had been correctly and completely indexed and that all oral statements made to us by governmental officials with respect to the status and content of public records were correct and complete. We also have assumed, without independent verification, the genuineness of all signatures, the due authorization of all recorded documents and instruments affecting record title to the Property and the enforceability of all such documents and instruments in accordance with their terms. Based upon the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, and subject to the exceptions and limitations set forth below, we hereby report the following: 1. Owners of Record. Marketable title to the Property under Subchapter 7 of Chapter 5 of Title 27 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated, subject only to the mortgages, encumbrances, permits and liens described below is vested in 1350 Spear LLC. The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 4 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] The Property is all and the same land and premises conveyed by Warranty Deed from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to 1350 Spear LLC dated October 7, 2011 and recorded in Volume 1031 at Page 73 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "G. & J. Farrell" on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plat"). 2. Encumbrances Disclosed by the Land Records. The Property is not subject to encumbrances or liens of record in the Land Records during the Period of the Search, except as follows: (a) Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated November 13, 2003 and recorded in Volume 648 at Page 627 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as modified by Modification of Mortgage from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to the Merchants Bank dated April 21, 2005 and recorded in Volume 708 at Page 68 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. (b) Rights of the public and others legally entitled thereto in any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a public road, way, street or alley. (c) State and municipal permits and/or approvals set forth below in Paragraph 3. 3. Permit Matters. Certain permits and approvals have been issued with respect to approving the creation of a planned unit development, with associated roads and utilities. The subdivision of the Property from other land then in common ownership, the construction of improvements on the Property, and the use and occupancy of the improvements on the Property required one or more permits and approvals from municipal or state agencies, commissions, districts or officials. Our research disclosed the following matters: (a) Municipal Zoning Matters. We were advised by the Zoning Administrator that the City of South Burlington adopted its zoning regulations in 1947 and its subdivision regulations in 1963. The subdivision of the Property and the construction of improvements on the Property required municipal approval and the issuance of zoning permits. As a result of our inquiry to the Zoning Administrator regarding permits issued by the City with respect to the Property, the Zoning Administrator provided the following: The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] April 17, 2017 Page 5 (i) City of South Burlington Building Permit No. 1392 issued on November 1, 1967 for the construction of a single family house with garage. (ii) City of South Burlington Building Permit No. 2007 issued on August 19, 1970 for the construction of a 24' x 25' utility shed. (iii) City of South Burlington Planning Commission approved the creation of a three acre lot as evidenced by Suggested Motion of Approval — Hopwood dated May 23, 1978, and the plat was recorded on May 24, 1978, within the 90-day time frame required for recording a Plat under 24 V.S.A. § 4416. (iv) City of South Burlington Zoning Permit No. 6344 issued on June 12, 1978 for a swimming pool. (v) City of South Burlington Zoning Permit No. 6908 issued on August 18, 1980 for the construction of 26' x 30' detached garage. (vi) City of South Burlington Zoning Permit No. 10269 issued on May 14, 1986 for a 12' x 20' porch and addition to living room. (vii) City of South Burlington Zoning Permit No. 95-239 issued on October 23, 1995 for renovation to master bath. (viii) City of South Burlington Zoning Permit No. 96-269 issued on November 19, 1996 for kitchen renovations. Reference is also made to the City of South Burlington Development Review Board approvals dated January 18, 2017 and discussed in Report on Title for 1340 Spear Street for proposed development on the Property. We note that any future improvements and alterations to the Property will be subject to the City's zoning regulations. We have not performed a zoning analysis for any future development proposal in connection with this purchase and express no opinion as to whether such permits would be issued or the terms and conditions that may be imposed. The Zoning Administrator has provided a written certification that the Property is not presently in violation of the Zoning Ordinances of the City of South Burlington. A copy is attached hereto. We direct your attention to the limitations and reservations set forth therein. The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 6 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] The above description of the Municipal Zoning Matters is for informational purposes only. We direct your attention to the provisions of Act 46 adopted by the Vermont Legislature in May, 1999 and amended in April, 2000 (the "Act") which provides in pertinent part that the failure to obtain or comply with a municipal land use permit (as defined in the Act) does not create an encumbrance on title and does not affect the marketability of title to the Property. See 27 V.S.A. § 612(b). In addition, an enforcement action for a failure to obtain a permit or for a violation of a permit condition that occurred more than 15 years ago is barred by the applicable statute of limitations created under the Act. It is important to note, however, that the failure to obtain a permit or comply with the terms of a permit is still a violation of the applicable municipal ordinances which are enforceable by legal proceedings (except as covered by the statute of limitations set forth above) and may result in the imposition of fines up to One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each violation for each day of the continuing violation. In the event the Property is to be sold, it is likely that a purchase and sale contract will include a provision requiring that the Property be in compliance with municipal and state ordinances, laws, rules and regulations regarding the use and occupancy of the Property. If the Property does not then comply with such ordinances, laws, rules and regulations, the proposed sale may be delayed or may fail to close. (b) State Subdivision Matters/Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Matters. The Property consists of a lot of land with a single-family residence thereon which was substantially completed prior to January 1, 2007. The boundaries of the Property, the structure thereon and its associated water and wastewater system do not appear to have been altered since January 1, 2007. Therefore, the Property is exempt from the State Subdivision Regulations. See §1-304 of the Environmental Protection Rules. Reference is also made to State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Wastewater Management Division Exempt Subdivision Number HE-4-0219 issued on July 24, 1998. We note that legislation passed on June 13, 2002 (5.27) and on May 18, 2007 (H.296), together with revised Environmental Protection Rules effective on September 29, 2007, modified the State Subdivision Regulations and phased out some prior exemptions. As such, any modifications to the boundary lines for the Property, the structure on the Property, the water and/or sewer demands for the Property or the failure of the wastewater or water systems may require amendments to the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit. We The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 7 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] express no opinion as to the capacity of municipal system to accommodate new sewer flows, the adequacy of future water systems or whether a Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit would be issued in the future and recommend that you consult with a professional engineer to properly evaluate these issues. (c) Stormwater. The Property consists of less than the one acre of impervious coverage required for a stormwater discharge permit. Accordingly, no permanent stormwater discharge permits appear to be required for the Property. See 10 V.S.A. § 1264(d)(1)(D). (d) Act 250 Jurisdiction Matters. See discussion under Section 3(d) of Report on Title for 1340 Spear Street. As the Property is subject to Act 250 jurisdiction by virtue of the above permits, any future improvements on the Property will also be subject to jurisdiction. See In re Russin, 162 Vt. 185, 643 A.2d 1209 (1994) (once jurisdiction attaches, subsequent modifications of the project will not be effective to remove jurisdiction). As such, the construction of improvements on the Property may require an Act 250 Permit Amendment (i.e., if a determination is made that the improvements will be classified as either a substantial or material change to the permitted project). See Environmental Board Rule 34(A) ("[a]n amendment shall be required for any material or substantial change in a permitted project"). A substantial change is defined as "any change in a development or subdivision which may result in significant impact with respect to any of the criteria specified in 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1) through (a)(10)." See Environmental Board Rule 2(G). A material change is defined as "[a]ny alteration to a project which has a significant impact on any finding, conclusion, term or condition of the project's permit and which affects one or more values sought to be protected by the Act." See Environmental Board Rule 2(P). WE HAVE NO INFORMATION REGARDING POSSIBLE ALTERATIONS TO THE PROPERTY AFTER THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THEREOF OTHER THAN AS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED HEREIN AND WE STATE NO OPINION AND MAKE NO CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER ALTERATIONS MADE AFTER THE DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED SEPARATE OR ADDITIONAL PERMITS. DISCLAIMER: Except to the extent specifically identified above, the undersigned has not undertaken any investigation whatsoever with respect to whether the Property and each component thereof as originally constructed or subsequently modified, with or without permits, was in The Snyder Group, Inc. City of South Burlington Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] April 17, 2017 Page 8 compliance with or continues to be in compliance with the provisions of the permits identified above or the applicable laws, rules and regulations, ordinance and orders. The permits identified above include numerous findings of fact, conclusions of law, exhibits, plans and other documents related to and referenced in the permits and the permits contain technical requirements to be satisfied prior to, during and after construction, many of such matters can only be determined by a physical inspection of the Property. The undersigned did not conduct such a physical inspection, nor is such inspection part of the title examiner's obligation. A full review of all those matters requires knowledge and skills in engineering, architecture and other professions outside of the legal profession. The undersigned states no opinion and makes no report or certification with respect to such matters. If you require additional information regarding the permits, or the status of the Property regarding compliance with the permits, you should contact the undersigned or your own counsel to discuss additional procedures and investigations which may be available at extra cost. 4. Other Matters. (a) An underground oil tank was removed from the Property in 2008 with contamination resulting from two leaks found in the tank. Site Management Activity was completed as referenced in a letter dated August 2, 2010 from Chuck Schwere, Section Chief, sites Management Section of the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. (b) No opinion is made as to the existence of any so-called ancient roads which may traverse the Property and could give rise to claims by the public for access over and upon such roadways. Determining the existence of ancient roads would require additional research beyond the Period of the Search and the services of other professionals. Please advise the undersigned if you wish to authorize such additional work. In order to facilitate the preparation of Schedule B, Part I of the commitment for title insurance and based on our knowledge of the transaction, we recommend requiring: Discharge of the Mortgage Deed from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to Merchants Bank dated November 13, 2003 and recorded in Volume 648 at Page 627 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, as modified by Modification of Mortgage from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to the Merchants Bank dated April 21, 2005 and recorded in Volume 708 at Page 68 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. 2. Warranty Deed from 1350 Spear LLC to The Snyder Group, Inc. or other instrument of conveyance. The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 9 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return and payment in full of the Vermont Property Transfer Tax due pursuant to 32 V.S.A. §§ 9602, et seq. 4. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the filing requirements of 32 V.S.A. §§ 10001, et seq. relating to the tax on the gain on the sale of real property, if any, as a result of the transfer of the Property. 5. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with the requirements of 32 V.S.A. § 5847 relating to withholding on the sale or exchange of real property for non-residents or delivery of a certificate establishing that the transfer of the Property is exempt from such provisions, or other evidence that 32 V.S.A. § 5847 is not applicable. 6. Satisfactory evidence of compliance with 26 U.S.C. § 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to withholding of tax on dispositions of United States real property interests by foreign persons, or delivery of satisfactory evidence that the transfer of the Property is exempt from 26 U.S.C. § 1445. Presentation to the undersigned of evidence satisfactory to the undersigned of the authority of the agent executing the Warranty Deed referred to in Item 2 above to make, execute and deliver such Warranty Deed. Mortgage Deed from The Snyder Group, Inc. to In addition, we direct your attention to the following: Taxes for the year July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 in the total amount of $13,414.59 due in three installments on August 15, 2016, November 15, 2016 and March 15, 2017 (copy of tax bill attached hereto). There are no delinquent taxes of record. 2. Payment in full of all amounts charged for water and sewer determined as a result of final readings taken at the time of closing. 3. The Property is not occupied as the seller's residence and based on our review of the City of South Burlington Grand List, the seller did not file this year's Homestead Declaration. Our examination of the Land Records covered the period from August 7, 1967 through April 17, 2017 at 8:00 in the forenoon (the "Period of the Search"). In preparing this Report, we have not examined or inquired into nor do we state any opinion or make any certification regarding the following, except to the extent specifically addressed above: Taxes or assessments against the Property, if any, currently or hereafter assessed (none of which are delinquent on the date hereof, unless noted above). The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 10 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] 2. Any instrument recorded prior or subsequent to the period of examination specified in this Report. 3. The application or effect of any laws, ordinances, bylaws, rules, regulations or plans of the United States, the State of Vermont or any subdivisions, agencies or departments thereof relating to zoning or environmental matters; or whether the Property contains or is located within an area designated as a federal flood hazard zone, a wetland or public waters. 4. Matters which would be disclosed by a physical examination, environmental audit or an accurate survey of the Property, including in particular public highway easements, easements appurtenant to adjacent lands arising from any subdivision of lands without provision for adequate access thereto, the availability or adequacy of public or private utilities and services or the description or physical location of the boundaries of the Property. 5. Rights of tenants and others in possession of all or any portion of the Property. 6. Any untrue, inaccurate or misleading statements contained or referred to in any recorded documents or public records. 7. Matters contained in records of probates, bankruptcy or other courts; the records of births, marriages, divorces or deaths; or the records of the formation, existence, registration or status of any entity which is a party to any document affecting the title to the Property. 8. The status of lease land rents. 9. Rights claimed in lands and premises forming the alleged homelands of certain American Indian or indian tribes and nations including, but not limited to, the Abenaki Indian Nation arising out of aboriginal rights. The Property may be part of the lands claimed. Claims have been made to certain lands and premises in northern and western Vermont, but the rights of the claimants have not been finally adjudicated. 10. The effect of any activities which could or might result in forfeiture of a right, title and interest in the premises to the United States of America for any violation under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Control Act of 1970, as amended, or to any other party pursuant to bankruptcy, insolvency or fraudulent conveyances or similar laws. 11. The potential application of the Vermont Land Use and Development Law (10 V.S.A. Ch. 151) and the Environmental Protection Rules to the Property by reason of activity constituting a "development," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3), or a "subdivision," as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(19), by any "person," as that The Snyder Group, Inc. April 17, 2017 City of South Burlington Page 11 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [Name of Bank] term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6001(14), resulting in: (a) the creation of ten or more lots within any continuous period of five years by a person other than the specifically identified persons appearing in the chain of title to the Property; (b) the creation of lots by any person identified in the chain of title which are located in any town other than the town where the Property is located; or (c) any other basis for a claim of jurisdiction by the Environmental Board based on the activities of any person other than a person specifically named in the chain of title to the Property. 12. The contents of or effect of records which existed at the time of our inquiry directed to the governmental officials named above which were not filed in the official file kept by such government officials regarding the Property at the time of our inquiry. This Report is solely for your benefit, is not transferable and is not for the use or benefit of any other person or entity, nor for use in connection with any transaction other than that described above. Very truly yours, GRAVEL & SHEA PC Robert H. Rushford Exhibit A A certain piece or parcel of land, with the improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto, located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed by Warranty Deed from Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell to 1350 Spear LLC dated October 7, 2011 and recorded in Volume 1031 at Page 73 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is depicted as "G. & J. Farrell' on a plat entitled: "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated January 25, 2011 and recorded in Map Slide 550 at Page 6 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The Property is also subject to: (a) the provisions of municipal ordinances, public laws, and special acts; and (b) all easements and rights of way of record, not meaning to reinstate any claims barred by operation of the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act, 27 V.S.A. § 601-611, both inclusive. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. RINUMTKI,IM � � v t � 3 N 8 e r Lamoureux &t Engineers March 13, 2017 I Dickinson Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists RE: Spear Meadow Master Plan Approval #MP-16-02 Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of Spear Meadows, Inc. in regards to the Master Plan Approval for Spear Meadows, located at 1302,1340, & 1350 Spear Street. The Findings of Fact & Decision were signed by the Development Review Board on January 18, 2017. Condition 5a of the Decision requires that the plan page titled "Master Plan" be updated to show the proposed path and sidewalk easements which are represented on the plan pages labeled "Master Plan North" and "Master Plan South". The plan has been revised accordingly. Enclosed are three full size and one reduced copy of the Master Plans (sheets 1-4, & MPL1). PDFs of the plans have been sent via email. Please contact our office if you need any additional information. Since�r, Andrew Rowe P.E. c: Chris Snyder Gary Farrell 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service r I1 I I I I SHgM — — 05]0-01225— — — — GLEN_ I PROPOSED PATH — — _ SCOLLINS 116DOO219 EASEMENT — �� 1160-00310 I - I / PBOA,O BIEBER &MILOT NA0,E MARO 1 ]d24X026 SKIFF 1M64006Y O PROPOSED PATH — — EASEMENT VALE DRIVE - �� RESIDENTIAL / / LOT 53 RESOIDENTEIL / PROPOSED PROPOSED SIDEWALK L2R _ RESIDENTIAL EASEMENT — ( 1)d3-00033 �' I PROPOSED — _ EXISTING CUL-DE-SAC ZHANG RESIDENTIAL PROPOSEDSIDEWALK EASEMENT VALE DRIVE \ TO BE REMOVED BOMLMANN TRUSTI PROPOSED / 1 RESIOE/RIAI 1 PROPosEo SURFACE UV M a STATE PROPOSED i 50 WETLAND BUFFER WA RBUFFE.R_ AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE STORMWATER / — 16d0012e0 O — — _ _ — — 6 J d 21METUND 1 DEFINED STREAM j -T. SURFACecFR _ CHANNEL FP CLASS2WETIAND t i I I LOT 49 1 PROPOSE RESIDENTI J. KELLLEY UNK101300 II 1J STING HOUSE AND 1AOE TO BE REMO D MARROOLla 16100121M I I I I — / 'JO' WETIAND BUFFER PROPOSED ACCESS TO OPEN SPACE LOT 52 W.IU O14M PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 1 �G S 1&do-0tdao (FUTURE PARK) �G AVONOA I 16Co4131) AVIGNE (HM1331 I �Y • ° 1 ,¢W EXgT►Ip GARAGE .. d. I I II ...... EXISTING USI: TOREEMION I 1 _I IL.�l_(jL,—II/ r, �� \ I I I � D. MUHR __ t6d001dOB L.A D. Yaxlo / // %� 11 �/ I 1 • 1 / A // I I I I I I • / 1e10-01d30 I _ ] II II ( III 11 1/ II I) I 1 II I I C•IOIETT ) I� I� 1610013a ` ` I I IT I I '1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 28 DWELLING UNITS 1 CONSTRUCTION tt I PHASE 1 U 20 DWELLING UNITS _ 1 I L� / ❑ I 0 / �y 1 01 GUNS I KU(:I ION PHASING PLAN N.T.S. I I II II I II ,I � II OPEN PACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR I 21103 PROPOSED 'L �/ / ROADS AS SHOWN ON ,� - �•� VAIEDRIVE THE OFFICIAL CRY MAP PROPOSED PATH OR TRAIL AS SHOWN OH / //I STREAM — CHANNEL THE OFFICIAL Cltt MAP IC It !i m CZ � Nti I I7 71 ZONING DATA NOTES: ZONING DATA TAKEN FROM THE SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING MAP AND THE CRY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OFFICIAL CITY IMP N.T.S. ZONING DATJe TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER-1&1 -o ZONING DISTRICT - SOUTHEAST QUADRANT. NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL- NR OVERLAY DISTRICTS- WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER DORSET PARK VIEW PROTECTION ZONE PROJECT PARCEL AREA 1%13AC. DEVELOPMENTAREA ILED A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 25,93 AC. TOTAL PROJECT PARCEL AREA RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 1) NEW DWELLING UNITS EXISTING DWELLING UNIT TO BE RETAINED dB TOTALDWELUNGUNITSPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TOTAL PROPo5ED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE • 3d0.000 SF (STREETS. ROOFTOP, DRIVEWAYS, & WALKS) VEHICLE TRIP ENDS MAXIMUM PROPOSED FM MAX HOUR TRIP ENDS • 52 PEAK HOUR TRIPS PARKING SPACES 96 PARKING SPACES(2 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT- GAPAGE AND(OR DRIVEWAY) 12 VISITOR PARKING SPACES (1 SPACES PER d DWELLING UNITS I! DRNE OR ONSTREET) PARKING SPACE FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 112 TOTAL PARKING SPACES STREET INFORMATION VALE DRIVE - PUBLIC STREET WITH VCONCRETE SIDEWALK - 28 FEET WIDE, 18 FEET WIDE AT WETLAND CROSSING SPEAR MEADOW ROAD PUBLIC STREET WITH IV WIDE PAVED PATH 26 FEET WIDE, 18 FEET WIDE AT WETLAND CROSSING STREET .1 FUTURE PUBLIC STREET WITH 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 24 FEET WICE NOTES. 1. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. LANDOWNER: SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. - SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05d03 APPLICANT', THE S-DER GROUP, INC. 4076 SHELBURNE ROAD, SUITE B SHELBURNE. VT OU82 LOCATION PLAN N.T.S. SOILS MAP Cv COVINGTON SILTY CLAY D OAS N.T.S, GeC & G B GEORGIA STONY LOAM C 0]M lA LIVINGSTON CLAY D am WIG MAISENR STONY SILT LOAM C OM Va0 VERGENNESCLAY D OAI GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 60 10D 200 d00 U. leap 1 Inch • 1000. -1317 1 ADD SIDEWALK& PATH EASEMENTS PER ORS APPROVAL ABR REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST SENB0IS slaw / OF ONLY SE USES RN THE PIIAPOSE SHq•N 8W*. SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY ED FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING prof. no. SPEAR MEADOWS 140 survey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON Deetgn ArBarn MASTER PLAN chocked DJG date 11-01-16 LAMOUREUX& OECKINSON Scale AS NOTED Englnaers, Inc. IE,SI s n0 14 M.lNng 14 Moru Drive Eamx Iwctial, Vi 05452 Tel: 602-6T8-q/50 1 I u THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY �IGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION Ir — j �SE�SHEET m I 111 IIf aM 11� ee 1 v1 ` ` aaoaJ I O'§Eo rr unuI � h► /( EASEMENT / S1'ORMWATER PIXJD �- I / / X 3,4 eel 3e1 I / 1 / / ► 1 f \\ 53 J / ------ ,� II I' �I 1 I LOT 49 �/ \ 10T �— `\I s _ _ �_ _ _ _ _ I \\ , I sroRMWATERI—D w I 2� / d\I +00 / x I/ 11 II MATCH LINE STA. / 1 ► t 1 1 PROPOSEDI j \ RESIDENTIAU ► vI PROPOSED / RESIDENTIAL CusS 2—ND/3. � / � I>w & u 3e1 Sex / 1 I /, / ► t, ',. ► -- / �/ t �*�..Om — NTIAL / Y �j DERSi I MINE. CHANNELII '3a1 3Te1,,i / II $ --------- RESIDE � / / J I / — — `` — qCJ '� \ ^I — 0 1 ► I 1 /-- — �— ...-._.-.. 'tl '' / r/ +` PROPOSE' J I/ .. MEee / � � S \ g� —+\ �, , See D 1 W RO \ ,at I 1 \ ►\ 11 I P ► / z I ...../-. —Rp AV :►1 1 It 9e6 .I 15 WIDE U UW EASEMENT TO ' - `�. — \ \ / ". ....—......—" `\\......... \ \ — — 4 HOMEOWNERS ASSOOIAT ctl NEWDRIVEWAY TO 1 \I \` _ \\-� — � 1 / \..,� \I � / ►I,, ► EXISTING HOUSE —EXISTING '— —•` 1 _ I \I 1 cuss2WETAlD ! •FeeRR''j1// 1'4 I ' i OT 53 Ii ► ls; I RESIDENTIAL \\ 1 \ ►:e!\ /� \ I - J S'\ 30 11 II 1 1 S RFtw F F ROPOSED BUFFERITY 1 li // I /' I '\ / I I RESIDENTIAL I I / EXIST, HDUSE / \ I `\ \ \\, •►. \' 1 1 S I A. 24+00 /� I �N 1 i� 1� ► ►1 MATCH LINE J II J/ I a 1 1 I LOT 50 � 1 1 _{ \V vv - � v • t eDw � v I � I / N 5y I BUFFER rIF1 1 � \ % / 1 1 j rn II PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL III 11 OPOSED \ \ I I I I- I j 1 RESIDENTIAL \ 11 11 m1l REVISIONS \ g \ 1 SEE SHEET 3 THESE RAMS WITH LATEST REVISIONS sxoDn v DMLY BE LISAD FOR THE PLIRPDSE SI M'M BELDM: SHEETS SKETCH CONCEPT PRELIMINARY 1 1--, O FINAL E:l RECORD DRAWING I — 1 wo— SPEAR MEADOWS s,008 1 / ` NOTE: A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D ► I I 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. desi SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON 9^ / ABR J i I 1 GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED drawn BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). MASTER PLAN ABRked \ \ 1 NORTH DJG EXISTNGMWSE AND \ 1 \ 1� - ►, ► dOfO OETOBE REMOVED \ ` l t`1 \ \ I\ 11—D1—lfj OARA 1 " i / I ,tj LI GRAPHIC SCALE acne I / ► / \�' 3o a Is >o eo t2o LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON e AS NOTED \` ` I esE \ 1 :e► Consulting Engineers, IS. . no. — — / ► 14 Mons Drive / - ! Eaaex lunciioe VT 05452 r(� / _ , Inc Imp Tel: 802-878-0450 2 T n=3on EXIS OAR E ANO REMC(ED / I SEE SHEET 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY \ �Zo 'oIGSAFE' PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION -_i IT1 J----- \ I PNDPDBED PAIN EASE Nf i — ( —� ..- -••. r' / Mq _ _ us C PROPOBEDBIDEINAK EA,EUENr --- - - -- — - -- �— _ROPOSED ----- r - RESIDENTIAL _t_ODE PROPOSED RESNTIAt RESIDENTIAL l '� I -392 L— - - - — - - ----------------------------- I � RESIDENTIAL { _ \� LOT 54 PROPOSED /� \ RESIDENTIAL i VALE DRIB I -CD , CIL U) z -. -j 7 F K'PR.13 ' i cusszvzEnwD pe 3" PROPOSED —392— � LOT 52 RESIDENTIAL �390 41' / — _ — .� PUBLIC OPEN SPACE se- END DEFINED CHANNEL r .. .. I {wj wAeeawETwn NOTE: 7. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. 2. GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). ' I PROPOB[DACtIlBB REVISIONS _ I �roaPENBRPcE THESE PLANS WITH LATEST WYMNS SHOULD / or 1 ONLY BE USED FOR DIE PURPOSE SHOWII BE1DM. SIRR 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY 1 �\ FINAL E:1 RECORD DRAWING _ pro}108 no. J LOT 52 SPEAR MEADOWS s vey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D ' I SPEAR STREET A VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design PUBLIC OPEN SPACE drawn MASTER PLAN �R ckw— SOUTHDjr GRAPHIC SCALE 11-01-16 30 0 15 30 60 130 scale LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON AS NOTED Consulting Englncers, lac ht. no. On ItI 14 Morse Drive t Incn - 30 n. Essex luncnoq Vf 05452 3 Tat: 602-878-0450 I aa�)1 _-------aee_ h I LOT 53 /3^ PHOPOR�mmLuemrr I_ / co / �\ UNNFMMILFVENMOLL88TAlE 3TB� — `,� ADIacuLTulnAl coLLc+1E \ ` \ - •,, / -378--^- ' V D E E RSV / Mf TTN0 N DI CM HIGH / SBiWICE TLINMISSION MNN / II PLAN OF CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN— I / I / are / / I / / GRAPHIC SCALE I LOT 49 f � all 30 0 15 ]0 80 1l0 I 8T3RMWAlER POND 1n i yr o.a _ � �— — ------ '-- — •- _ _ _ �— — _ — / I \ / me — — - OPEN SPACE _396... PINNACLE AT SPEAR �.J ` ,ram ...,. • 1 .. _„-..1-.,...yeas -age- 4 054 N�NF / 1 — — — PROPOSED? / Tq RESIDENTIAL VALE DRIVE SEE SHEET 3 / AT v R1TTN0 PAVEMB T. CUW:XND � _ � — "% _• f:S]@aAG(AROUND CUL -6+� I / —\\ro!P@EgVEO Ommmw tllltrAND BWUTL -- —_1- GRAPHIC SCALE w o 15 3o w 120 // I / mont— i h=30n. NOTE: 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. 2. GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). 116E PAWS WITH LATEST WVISIOIIS SHOULD II OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHO" BELOW: SHEER SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL I] RECORD DRAWING prof. no. SPEAR MEADOWS u4 y A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR MASTER PLAN ABIR X-COUNTRY UTILITIES & CDJCked VALE DRIVE EXTENSION date 11-01-16 LAMOUREUX & DSCIUNSON stale AS NOTED cn—Ri M "_nR EnQfneers, lac. l4 Morse 14 Dme sht. no. 14sven luncuars VT05452 4 LEGEND PRO.ECT PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE WF S EXISTINGJ PROPERTYLINE I I PT CJUD PROPOSEDSEDBETo BE 01S30LVE0 — — SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBED HARE FENCE SITE STONE WALL IPF IRON PIPE FOUND LOCATION MAP IRMA(SHAM ESTATE 21M • IRE RWRODFOUND TNOMA9 B LOMSE w Ill, TSF T AKE FOUND N.T.S KLEN LIFE ESTATE 1D'N'F VOL. 405, PG. 7� o�w CITY OF�N BURLINGTON NIF 19 AG \ "7L'F ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT TO BE SET MICHAELS MARY VOL 1? PG.2]S--3T.E0' _ $ p3A,PO td P. JENIFER BOV9K1 BCOLUNS — 3Oi•II5'4p�E— —V 04= O pPATN FJSPAIEM— G DFBpI^„ S S JENNIFER MKOT WF 1'Iff C DUTY • IF IRON PIPE SET Nff VOL. 113. ai.. J. AO—,pn..•. // WL, BU��7� SURVEY POINT NO MARKER) VOL. —. PG. R1 317-W — qLE�' PIN. IQ2 1' IRE 01'6B�— �IVE� NP NOW OR FORMERLY !S37 pf1ppp6ED P_A1N� T— YVF NpT'1M'A^N AS ABWEGRADE 2.6'AG WNOPORED L0T53 LOT 54 J Y JOHN IARKN BO BELOWGRADE _ SIDEWALK EASEMENT NIF 1 Lors3 / va.lolo,Pun NOTES: �I -- 1. THIS PLAT SOUS COMPILED FROM FIELD SURVEYS AND RECORD LOT 53 ` \ RESEARCH INCLL W THE USE OF TIE FWLOWINO PUNS: A.tANDSOFF1 ERTANDMARJOMESKIFF,SWIFTSTREET.SOUTH PROOSEO UTILITY I ���� `�/ BURUNGTON. VERMONT. 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PUT.'MTED42-01, EASEMENT _ VALE DRIVE LAST REVISED 32303, BY LAMOIW EU%8 OICKINSON CONSULTNO (PROPOSED) ENGINEERS.INC.ASRECOROEDINSUDE3p20FTEpTYOFSOUTH BURIL/ SWFT ESTATES, UNDRECOBD3. B.'BYMFTES ENGINEERING, SOUTH B AS TON. IN VOL. 184 OR, BY OUTLETS URLINT AS RECORDED IN VOL. BO, PAGE ix OR THE SOUTH BURLINOTON LINO RECORDS, OT 51 ! C 'PUT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOWS. IIVM A STATE LTARRANT. D M C FRANZONI.1340 SPEAR STREET. SO UT1 AGRICIATUNAL PROPOSED N BURLINGTON,VERMONT.DATEDJANUARY25,2011,BYOVIL COLLEGE SIORMWATER "Q IRON RDD NO PIMiACLEATBPEAR ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. NC.. AS RECORDED IN SLIDE BED OF EASEMENT978'993TE OF IRE TSF OPEN SaF PACE THE CITY SOUTH BURLINOTON LAND RECORDS VOL. IN, PG. 3% {� IRON PIPE TO BE SET O.TAG _ .� H, oVAG 1 NIF V9 NO3'ZT40Yl D. RUT OF SURVEY. LANDS OF FARRELL S COLE. 130Y, 1340 51030 N I SPEAR STREET, SOUTH BUiUNGTON. VERMWT, DATED I" — �O �I NOVEMBER 291I00E, BY OVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, AS O ' R DORMD IN SLIDE 550 OF THE OTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RE CORDE N v Q I LOT 32 E.'RNALPUT FORSUIDIVISIONOFPROPERTYOFOERALDMILOT 1 AND JOIN LARKIN, PINNACLE • SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWUNT TWO) v VAULAN, MAUNEEN B.BO ACRES SPEAR STREET. SWM BUtLINGTON. VERMOfT' GiTED 531 N, OLD EJtT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE LASTREVISEDt.5YVAU4HNC.BUTTON,L5..ASRECORDEDIN T) N1F SLIDES 2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. LAT40 , NNv VO.2 d.P0.225 hF 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE GENERATED FROM AND ARE RASED ON THEVERMOM STATE RAE COORDNATESURVEYGAOTONSRECORDEDL SIRE TE A � � et l I SYSTEM, NADBJFORS tpxl f MST R I 1 \ 5" � 24,14 ME5. THIS PROPERTYTHEFIEUDKMAV EIS BRCT TOOTHS SURVEY MIS ER EASEMENTS AND'ON S VIP I RIGHTS-0E-WAY. 8814' 6. MONUAENTATON FOUND IS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN ` 1• I •� I LOT 6O 7 GARAGE SBB91521N I T THE WIDTH OF FOUR RODS (BS) SHORAN FOR SPEAR STREET IS 0.1'AO 1.5. a DAVID A UNDA --ENSA 1.1'AO _ YOUNG 614'S6'ZZYI BASEDONADESCRIPTION FOUND ON PAGE 220E THE TOWN OF _ BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS. 15M-1 SE5. VOL.Iwm.BS 'I I VOL. 412, PG. IN 0. THIS PLN4 IS INTENDED FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW PURPOSES S1o•{'1/1= ONLY LOT I! KENNETH MILLE+eB.er R. II 99e53.10"w { s oxL L I I � Ill VOL.IV4,PG,4p CITY CLERK'S OFFICE J \ rt� O� / Haar/ 1 i I J I I Il sue. cmGF3amIBURUNGTON.Yr._- I g RELIVED PWRFCOiU _. ..H il ��� / `` ! / / _ 1 t�� �+ AT oaGa ..AND �•IfT \ I I I �—,.J I I rg MAJTGAREU RecowFDxxnep MraE31f uTsm/ \ I I A IV. E. Arrwr. OrvCll3iN 'I1 � VOL 137, PG. 323 NIP D.I. PI SP/. wR S �/ I I I r! f- J I � — I REVISIONS PROJECT"' �`1 I UNDS OF uAoi1/ 1 I' 1—; co�no nnGnnn%n/IZ Mir' I. I RaERON AVl11DA AV IMF I IIBIE \ VOL 1045, PC. 221 Nr I I GRAPHIC SCALE I ITTah - 10D h ��,�\ PPROVED BY RESOLV710N OF THE DEVELOPMENT 1.7ADIEIT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, \ VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF—. 2016 OWNEROWNER: SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS : OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 19508PEAR STREET _ 2016 BY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. VW. 747. P L 659E53 TOTAL PARCEL AREA � 25.p3 ACRES (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) TOTHEBESTOFMYKNOTMEOOE,THIS TT1111I11 �FROMPERtINOENTDEEFDSADA)ROTRER �O ,{ r(�1*F� OFFICIAL RECORO9, ANOMMIQRS EVIDENT ON THE PROPERTY. AND CONPoRMS Y/ITH THE `��t �\ i= ..� DOUGLAS REQUIREMEMT9 OF 2T VSA 1,103. ,,, DATED THIB_DAYOF_ M16 - HENSON No. 656 L.S.E%B MY71 / III I L L3\V STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. — 1302, 1340 & 1350 Docket No. Vtec Spear Street Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. — 1302, 1340 & 1350 Docket No. Vtec Spear Street Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that today, upon receipt from jud-noreply(&vermont. ov of confirmation of the electronic submission to the Vermont Superior Court — Environmental Division of the Notice of Appeal, I served a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Clerk of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board via first-class mail by causing a copy of the same to be deposited into the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: David Parsons, Clerk City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 16th day of February, 2017. Respectfully submitted, MURPHY SULLIVAN KRONK By: ls/ Daniel A. Se ff Daniel A. Seff, Esq. ERN 1514 275 College Street, P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Phone: 802-861-7000 (x1 19) Fax:802-861-7007 Email: dseff@mskvt.com Attorneys for Appellants KJ HY MSK S U RIVA UI.LIVAN KRONK. February 16, 2017 VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL David Parsons, Clerk City of South Burlington Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. —1302, 1340 & 1350 Spear Street Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. —1302, 1340 & 1350 Spear Street Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 Dear Mr. Parsons: I represent Appellants William Gilbert, Maurene Gilbert, Louise Kleh, Michael Scollins, Mary Scollins, Robert Skiff, Marley Skiff, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association (collectively, "Appellants") in the above -referenced Vermont Superior Court — Environmental Division appeal (assignment of docket numbers pending). Pursuant to Rule 5(b)(4)(A) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, enclosed please find Appellants' Notice of Appeal and the accompanying Certificate of Service. I filed the enclosed Notice of Appeal and Certificate of Service electronically with the Court at approximately 1:25 PM today (filing #229895). As of 2:45 PM, this afternoon, I am awaiting confirmation that processing is complete and that the filings have been accepted. Please contact me at 802-861-7000 or dseff@mskvt.com with any questions or concerns. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours, lsl Daniel A. Seff Daniel A. Seff Enclosures (2) cc: Mr. Ray Belair (via e-mail) (wlencls.) Mr. Paul Conner (via e-mail) (w/encls.) Ms. Donna Kinville (via e-mail) (w/encls.) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) (w/encls.) 275 COLLEGE STREET, PO BOX 4485 BURLINGTON, VT 05406-4485 PHONE 802 861-7000 FAX 861-7007 MSKVT.COM STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. — 1302, 1340 & 1350 Docket No. Vtec Spear Street Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 In re: The Snyder Group, Inc. — 1302, 1340 & 1350 Docket No. Spear Street -Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 Findings of Fact and Decision dated January 18, 2017 NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COME Appellants William Gilbert, Maurene Gilbert, Louise Kleh, Michael Vtec Scollins, Mary Scollins, Robert Skiff, Marley Skiff, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association (collectively, "Appellants"), by and through their counsel, Murphy Sullivan Kronk, and hereby appeal, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) and 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), to the Vermont Superior Court, Environmental Division, from the January 18, 2017 Decisions of the City of South Burlington Development Review Board ("DRB") granting The Snyder Group, Inc.'s applications for preliminary plat (#SD-16-18) and master plan (#MP-16-02) approval for a planned unit development on the 26.15-acre property located at 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont (the "Property"). Copies of these two January 18, 2017 DRB Decisions are attached hereto as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively. Appellants are interested persons within the meaning of 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3) who participated, within the meaning of 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), in the DRB proceedings concerning the Property. Pursuant to the above -cited statutes, Appellants have standing and party status to file and prosecute this appeal. All interested persons must enter an appearance in writing with the Vermont Superior Court, Environmental Division within 20 days of receiving this notice or in such other time as Page 1 of 2 may be provided in subsection (c) of Rule 5 of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, if they wish to participate in the appeal. DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 16th day of February, 2017. Respectfully submitted, MURPHY SULLIVAN KRONK By: lsl Daniel A. Se ff Daniel A. Seff, Esq. ERN 1514 275 College Street, P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 Phone: 802-861-7000(x119) Fax:802-861-7007 Email: dseff@mskvt.com Attorneys for Appellants Page 2 of 2 NOTICE OF APPEAL - EXHIBIT A #SD-16-18 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING THE SNYDER GROUP, INC.-1302, 1340 & 1350 SPEAR STREET PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-16-18 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Preliminary plat application #SD-16-18 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi- family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on August 23, September 20, and October 4, 2016. The applicant was represented by Chris Snyder and Andy Rowe. Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, The Snyder Group, Inc., seeks preliminary plat approval for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Spear Meadows, Inc. 3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. 4. The application was received on June 17, 2016. 5. The plan submitted consists of 18 pages with the first page labeled "Spear Meadows A Residential Planned Unit Development Spear Street & Vale Drive South Burlington Overall Site Plan," dated June 6, 2016, and prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. A) DENSITY The South Burlington Land Development Regulations for the SEQ-NR district allow a maximum base density of 1.2 units per acre and a density of four (4) units per acre with a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). With a TDR, the combined parcels allow for a maximum density of 103 units (25.93 acres x 4=103.7 rounded down to the nearest whole unit), and without a TDR, thirty-one units (25.93 acres x 1.2 units/acre=31.12). The applicant has proposed 48 units (one existing single family and 47 new units), which is possible for this parcel with the transfer in of 17 development rights (48 units - 31 existing TDRs=17). #SD-16-18 The project involves three (3) existing parcels that will be merged and subdivided into seven (7) lots. Footprint lots are proposed for 47 dwelling units (single family houses, duplexes, and triplexes) and the metes and bounds are noted in the plans. B) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (A)(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. The Public Works Department shared the following comments from John Tymecki of the Champlain Water District/South Burlington Water Department: 1. The 24" x 8" tap site and materials will need to be approved by CWD. Water allocation for this project needs to be approved by CWD and SBWD. 2. The balance of infrastructure will need to be approved by the City of South Burlington Water Department with my comments as follows: a. Sheet 12, Item 1.2 Ductile Iron pipe. Recommending zinc coated ductile iron pipe as well as bio wrap. b. Standard polyethylene sleeve for D.I. pipe applies if zinc coated pipe is not required. c. Item 1.7 Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant assemblies are now required to be fitted with a 4" Storz connection. d. Item 1.8 C. All curb stop boxes shall be equipped with pentagon nut caps. Two hole curb box caps are no longer permitted. 3. Depending on the City's future water requirements for the Public Park (7.0 Acres Total) a water main future should be installed at +/- Sta. 31+75 running West along the proposed 10' wide gravel path. 4. The proposed potable water interconnection at Sto. 38+80 connects two disparate pressure zones which if activated would raise operating pressures on Spear Street (including areas of Shelburne), Olivia Dr., Pinnacle Dr., Nowland Farm Rd., Vale Drive and all other hydraulically connected side streets. At the very least, the water main connections between Spear Street and Olivia Dr. / Nowland Farm Rd. would need to be closed. That being said I have experienced firsthand that an RWGV may leak after several years of closure. This type of failure could result in a catastrophic pressurization in the Spear Street Reduced Pressure Zone. 1 am recommending that the two aforementioned connections at Spear Street and Olivia Dr. / Nowland Farm Rd. be cut and capped the cost of which would need to be determined. 5. The above cut and cap recommendation would result in a large residential area being fed from one 8" connection to CWD's High Service 1 Transmission Main. A hydraulic analysis of the area should be undertaken to determine what can be expected for domestic and fire flow capability to such a service area. 6. The Spear Meadows project interconnection with the existing Vale Drive water main appears to partially address an identified area of concern mentioned in the Aldrich & Elliott Engineering Services Agreement, dated June 22, 2015, Page 4 of 12 which reads: `The following other areas of concern were identified for inclusion into the updated master planning and alternatives will be evaluated for potential improvements. -Low water pressures at on the east side of Spear Street." #SD-16-18 The above comments must be resolved for final plat. (A)(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. (A)(3) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study. The application materials state the project will generate 52 P.M. Peak Hour trip ends on the property. The Board received the following comments from Justin Rabidoux of Public Works in an email dated September 29, 2016: I reviewed the traffic study for the referenced project submitted by L&D on behalf of the applicant. / support its findings with one exception — a southbound on Spear left turn lane needs to be added to this project to improve overall access, circulation and safety to the general area. The applicant has, under separate cover, sent over what that lone Mould look like and i approve of its design, l encourage the DRB to add this to the project and I suspect the applicant would be accept that condition. DPW staff has gone over the overall plans with Andy Rowe from L&D numerous times and each time minor tweaks have been made to pedestrian issues and I think the plan is acceptable at this point. 1 want to use this opportunity to remind the applicant that all pavement markings have to be Type 1 Permanent markings and preapproved by DPW prior to installation. Justin Robidoux Director of Public WorksJCity Engineer The Board will review this criterion at the final plat stage of the development review process. (A)(4) The projecVs design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. #SD-16-18 The project's layout avoids development in the Class II wetlands and a significant portion of the onsite wetlands will be preserved in the project's designated open space area, which is proposed to be conveyed to the City and may possibly be developed as a park in the future. Plans for the project show the wetland buffer line being marked by boulders, split rail fence, shrubs, and/or trees, which the Board preliminarily finds to be sufficient separation and protection for those areas after residents move in to the development. The Board finds that the wetlands and stream running through the property provide the applicant with an opportunity —in the spirit of being innovative, as is required by the PUD standards —to educate residents about the onsite habitat and sensitive areas. For example, informational signage explaining the role of the wetlands in the health of the community and property. The Board preliminarily finds the wetland and stream impacts indicated on the plans to be permissible. (A)(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The project is located in the City's Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). The Comprehensive Plan states that "there has been a strong interest in building neighborhoods at higher densities in order to conserve more of the SEQ's priority open space lands." This project fulfills this goal because it uses the Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) to increase the density of the project and further conserves open space by proposing duplex and triplex buildings. The duplex and triplex development proposed by the applicant visually varies from the existing single-family development pattern of the area; however, the project also incorporates single- family homes. Additionally, the Board finds that undeveloped land to the north of the proposed project and single-family house lots to the south and southwest of the project are most likely to be developed and redeveloped, respectively, in a pattern more closely aligned with the proposed project than with existing development. The Board finds that while the proposed project may appear somewhat visually different from existing development in the area, it is visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Purpose of the SEQ District and in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (A)(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The project's layout includes open space around the wetland in the south and southwest area of the site and a buffer around a stream bed which traverses the project site as well as adjacent properties. The open space abuts open space in the neighboring developments on Pinnacle Drive and Vale Drive. This results in approximately 20 acres of connected, undeveloped space. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria met. (A)(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Department submitted the following comments in an email dated August 9, 2016: All in all looks pretty good. Would need to run the apparatus template over the final plans to be sure. As always the fire hydrants need to be in place and tested prior to construction of combustible structures and the overall PUD must be compliant with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 en Coto. 4 #SD-16-18 The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (A)(8) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. Both the ten (10) foot paved path along the eastern border of the property and the sidewalk on the eastern side of the proposed Vale Drive extension will connect to the existing sidewalk system on Vale Drive. Street 'A' goes to the property line thus making extension to the south possible if the abutting lot is redeveloped. The proposed Vale Drive extension goes to the property line thus making extension to the north possible if that property is developed. The extension of Vale Drive will be constructed to the northern property line and similarly Street'A' will be built to the southern property line. The Board finds it possible that the properties abutting Street 'A' and the northern portion of Vale Drive could be developed in the future and that these two (2) streets could be part of an interconnected roadway system eventually conveyed to and maintained by the City. Therefore the streets must be built to standards which are acceptable to the City. (A)(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. For Transect Zone subdivisions, this standard shall only apply to the location and type of roads, recreation paths, and sidewalks. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria met. (A)(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). In addition to the discussion above regarding the project's visual compatibility with the planned development patterns of the SEQ Zoning District, the Board finds the project to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the district since it will have a greater density of housing through the use of TDRs. In addition, this greater density, combined with the variety of housing styles (single-family, duplex, and triplex) may create more affordable housing options. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes, and proposes actions to address, the chronic shortage of affordable housing in the SEQ. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria to be met. C) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD requires site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. #SD-16-18 As discussed above, the Board preliminarily finds this criteria is being met. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The Board appreciates the sidewalks, paths, crosswalks, and signage (stop signs and pedestrian zone signs) throughout the proposed development, because those amenities will promote safe pedestrian movement. The Boards finds that adequate parking is provided for residents and their guests in garages and driveways. Additionally there are four (4) proposed parking spaces on Vale Drive by the gravel path leading to the open space area. The Board finds that the cedar hedges planned between houses and sidewalks connecting the ten (10) foot paved path along the easterly border of the property with the sidewalk on the eastern side of Vale Drive will provide some privacy for residents and a transition from the public area (paths and sidewalks) to the private area (dwelling units). The landscaping plan describes, but does not visually show, "foundation plantings." Foundation plantings requirements established by the applicant include that a "minimum of 18 deciduous shrubs and 12 evergreen shrubs shall be planted for each dwelling unit. The cumulative number of plantings for a building containing multiple dwelling units may be apportioned around the perimeter of the building based upon the location of the windows, porches, decks, retaining walls, and other site conditions." Foundation plantings are to be selected from a list developed by the applicant and stated on the landscaping plan. The Board finds that these plantings very well may be adequate for each building; however, it is difficult to visualize the layout of the plantings for the various building configurations. The Board finds that renderings of typical plantings will be required at the final plat stage of the review process. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) ... (ii) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; ON — NO... Each dwelling unit will have a garage. Parking is planned in the driveways, garages, and along both a portion of Spear Meadow Road and the extension of Vale Drive. The triplexes will be accessed from a private driveway at the rear of the buildings and therefore the garages and parking will also be in the rear. Some of the duplexes are proposed to have a garage vehicle entrance that is perpendicular to the street and the Board finds this to be positive. The single-family houses lining the easterly side of Vale Drive could be good candidates for a rear garage entrance except that the proximity to the paved path M #SD-16-18 along that property line makes the idea unappealing to the Board. Rear alleyways with garages also are not ideal for other houses on the property, because many of the houses are close to either wetland buffers or stormwater ponds. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. The proposed housing would be two (2) stories and no waivers are sought for height. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria met. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. The Board finds this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The transitions between structures are primarily dictated by the Home Design Guidelines prepared and proposed by the applicant. Among other items, the Guidelines indicate that buildings "should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony." The Guidelines state that front porches, stoops, and balconies which are oriented to the street are encouraged, but are not required. The Guidelines further state that identical home models cannot be placed next to or across the street from one another. To be considered sufficiently different, a model "must change any two of the five variables," which include "mirroring the plan, changing the color scheme, revising the placement or orientation of the garage, changing the palate of materials or modifying the roof lines." The Board considers that these changes will result in attractive transitions between buildings and avoid monotony within the development. The Board preliminarily finds these criteria are met. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed houses will have facades oriented towards the street and sidewalks, which is in keeping with the nearby neighborhoods on Vale Drive and Pinnacle Drive. The Board finds that the duplexes closest to Spear Street (units #46 & #47) will represent a change in style and form from the existing houses on Spear Street, which are single family and many of which are set back further from the road. The Home Design Guidelines prepared by the applicant require any units facing two (2) streets to include architectural and site elements that address both front facades. Making these units appear as much as possible to be a single-family house may provide a better transition between existing structures #SD-16-18 on Spear Street and the proposed structures on Spear Meadow Road. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: 1. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land maybe required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Board does not consider the reservation of land to be necessary except that the irrevocable offers of dedication for the northern end of Vale Drive and southern end of Street A must extend to the property line. 2. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 3. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The applicant submitted material stating that household waste will be stored within the units and the attached garages. The Board preliminarily finds this proposal to be acceptable. 5. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13.06) Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to planned unit development review. The total cost of the project is estimated at $9,950,000 by the applicant. The minimum landscaping budget, as shown below, is $107,000 and the applicant has proposed a budget of $107,450. Total Building Construction or Building Improvement Cost % of Total Construction/ Improvement Cost Cost of proposed project $0 - $250,000 3% $7,500 Next $250,000 2% $5,000 Additional over $500,000 1 1% $94,500 Minimum Landscaping $ $107,000 Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans should depict snow storage areas or the applicant should describe plans for removal of snow to an offsite location. The Board finds that snow storage areas must be shown on the final plat. D. SOUTHEAST QUADRANT W #SD-16-18 This proposed subdivision is located in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Therefore, it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ: A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ-NR sub- district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub -district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. The applicant has indicated that the proposed buildings will not be more than 28 feet tall. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria to be met. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board preliminarily finds that this project meets this criterion. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board preliminarily finds this project meets these criteria. (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. The applicant proposes to convey the parcel denoted as Lot #52 on the site plan, which is 6.8 acres, to the City for use as public open space that may be developed into a park to meet the active and passive recreational needs of South Burlington's residents. If the City accepts that parcel for use as public open space then the City would be responsible for its management. The land around each home, beyond the footprint lot lines, will be owned and maintained by the development's homeowner association, which will be responsible for maintenance of the lawns and landscaping. The applicant's materials state that each "homeowner will have the limited right to use the space immediately adjacent to their home for flower beds, raised garden beds, or patio space." If landscaping will be used, this must be shown on the final plat plans, including the budget for installation. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under 0 #SD-16-18 the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. Plans for the project show the wetland buffer line marked by boulders, split rail fence, shrubs, and/or trees, which the Board finds is sufficient separation and protection for those areas after residents move in to the development. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. The easterly portion of the project, according to the applicant, has been in agricultural use with a rotation of crops over the past several years. The applicant has not provided information regarding the agricultural production values of the land as currently used. By developing the property with housing the agricultural use will cease. The Board considers the use of TDRs means the property will support additional density onsite and preserve land from development elsewhere in the SEQ, which is a significant goal of the Comprehensive Plan. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion is met. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirement, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. A condition of final plat approval will be that prior to receiving a zoning permit the applicant will need to obtain whichever of the permits listed above are necessary for the site. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds these criteria preliminarily met. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement 10 #SD-16-18 with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The applicant has stated that further discussions will occur with the Fire Marshal prior to final plat, particularly regarding the sprinkler systems which the Fire Marshal may require on private roads. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. in making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. The Board will review this criterion at the final plat stage of the development review process. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. This topic has been covered already in these comments. The Board finds this criteria preliminarily met. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. As discussed previously, it is considered likely by the Board that Vale Drive and Street 'A' may at some point in the future be continued and/or connected to other roadway systems that be maintained by the City. The applicant proposes, in compliance with 15.12(D)(4), to construct the streets to the property line. The Board preliminarily finds this criteria to be met. 9.07 Regulating Plans A. ... B. C. ... D. Parks Design and Development. (1) General standards. The SEQ has an existing large community park, the Dorset Street Park Complex. Parks in the SEQ may be programmed as neighborhood parks or mini -parks as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Mini parks in the SEQ should be a minimum of 10,000 square feet, with programming approved by the South Burlington Recreation Department. Such parks are to be located through the neighborhoods in order to provide a car free destination for children and adults alike, and to enhance each neighborhood's quality of life. They shall be knitted into the neighborhood fabric as a focal point in the 11 #SD-16-18 neighborhood, to add vitality and allow for greater surveillance by surrounding homes, local streets and visitors. Each park should be accessible by vehicle, foot, and bicycle and there should be a park within a quarter -mile of every home. (2) Specific Standards. The following park development guidelines are applicable in the SEQ- NRT, SEQ-NR, SEQ-VR, and SEQ-VC districts: a. Distribution and Amount of Parks: i. A range of parks and open space should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation. ii. Parks should serve as the focus for neighborhoods and be located at the heart of residential areas, served by public streets and fronted by development. iii. Parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program. iv. A neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one -quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned developed recreation area. b. Dedication of Parks and Open Space: Parks and protected open space must be approved by City Council for public ownership or management, or maintained permanently by a homeowners' association in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. c. Design Guidelines i. Parks should be fronted by homes and/or retail development in order to make them sociable, safe and attractive places. ii. Parks should be located along prominent pedestrian and bicycle connections. iii. To the extent feasible, single -loaded roads should be utilized adjacent to natural open spaces to define a clear transition between the private and public realm, and to reinforce dedicated open space as a natural resource and not extended yard areas. The applicant is prepared to convey a 6.8 acre parcel to the City for open space and possible development into a park. The open space contains significant areas of Class II wetlands, which limit its development into a park. It is located in the southern portion of the project site, would have homes nearby (existing and proposed), and would abut other open space. While the open space would not be located at the center of the proposed development, it would connect the proposed development and existing neighborhoods, which could access it via sidewalks or on bicycle. The amount of land, 6.8 acres, as compared to the number of possible residents in the proposed development (2.19 people/avg. household x 48 units=105.12 people) far exceeds the standard of 7.5 acres/1,000 residents or 0.0075 acres/person (0.0075 acres/person x 105.12 residents=0.79 acres). Given the size of the proposed open space, it could serve many more people than those located in the proposed development. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. 9.08 SEQ-NR &NRT Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 500 12 #SD-16-18 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. Vale Drive is uninterrupted for a span of greater than 500 feet; however, there are three (3) crosswalks at intervals of approximately 500 feet that connect to sidewalks. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion met. (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). The northern portion of the extended Vale Drive and Street 'A' are presently depicted as dead ends; however, the streets will extend to the property line and may at some point in the future be continued and/or connected to other roadway systems. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. See discussion above. (4) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. The presently existing lots are to be merged then subdivided into seven (7) new lots; however, the requirement for a minimum ratio of 1:2 is not applicable in this circumstance, because the project is a PUD and the lots being created will not be used as lots for individual houses, but for housing clusters. The purpose of the minimum lot ratio is to ensure a certain form and pattern in development. However, this project is proposed as a PUD and incorporates an innovative approach that clusters multiple housing units on the created lots. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the NR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-1 and 9-2, and Figures 9-4 and 9-5 of the SBLDR. The proposed streets within the project site will conform to the street design criteria for Local Streets as outlined in Table 9-2 of the LDRs. Spear Meadow Road and the extension of Vale Drive will be 26 feet wide except at wetland crossings and some crosswalk areas. These dimensions could allow parking on one side of the street. Street 'A' and the private driveway for accessing the triplexes will be 24 feet 13 wide, which is considered a width where on -street parking would not occur and "No Parking" signs must be shown on final plat plans. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (2) Sidewalks. (a) Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. (b) Sidewalks are required on one side of the street. Plans show that the sidewalks will be a minimum of five (5) feet in width, will occur on at least one side of the street, and will have a sufficient planting strip. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) (a) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. (b) Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. The City Arborist submitted the following comments regarding the landscaping: Species Selection Red Maple cultivars aren't well suited to the clay soils in this part of the city. The neutral to alkaline conditions often results in manganese deficiency. Recommend substituting 'Celebration' or 'Sienna Glen' Freeman Maple I'd recommend limiting the use of Tupelo as a street tree as it can be difficult to establish and also requires slightly acidic soil. It would be worth trying in small numbers, particularly near the stormwater pond or in a wetland buffer I'd recommend substituting Accolade' or Triumph' Elm for 'Princeton' Elm. Princeton Elms exhibit a very dense branching habit which I believe will result in structural problems as the trees mature The Board finds the applicant must adhere to the comments of the City Arborist and revise final plat plans to reflect those comments. (4) On -street parking. Sufficient space for one lane of on -street parking shall be provided on all streets except for arterials outside of the SEQ-VC and SEQ-VR sub -districts. This requirement may be waived within the SEQ-NRN sub -district provided the DRB finds sufficient off-street parking has been provided to accommodate the parking needs of the uses adjacent to the street. As discussed above, on -street parking will be provided on Spear Meadow Road and Vale Drive. It does not appear that Street 'A' would have sufficient width for on -street parking; however, under the review of this project as a PUD, the DRB may waive the requirement that the street be built to public roadway standards (Section 15.12(D)). The Board preliminarily waives the requirement that Street A be built to public roadway standards. 14 #SD-16-18 (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic. At two (2) of the six (6) proposed crosswalks the street narrows to reduce pedestrian crossing distance. All crosswalks are proposed to have signage indicating a pedestrian crossing to both directions of traffic. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. Applicant did not include within the plans any information regarding lighting plans and fixture design. These must be provided for final plat. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas ... A minimum of thirty- five percent (35°0) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented to the south... The applicant's materials, specifically the Home Design Guidelines, affirms that houses will be oriented to the street, that garages will be on the northerly side of buildings, and that a minimum of 35% of translucent windows and surfaces will face south. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines affirms this criteria and the Design Constraints section contained therein specifies how that variation will be achieved. As discussed above in these comments, the Board finds that the Design Constraints will create some variability of building facades but also will require some common building elements within the development. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings should beset back a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk. (b) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. The applicant has proposed that buildings should be set back ten (10) feet from the street right of way 15 #SD-16-18 and that garages must be set back 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk. The Board finds the proposed house setback will create a close relationship between the building and the street. The Board preliminarily finds that setting garages at least 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk is a positive to the pedestrian ambiance of the street and that this criterion is met. (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages with a vehicle entrance that faces a front lot line, the facade of the garage that includes the vehicle entrance must be set back a minimum of eight feet (8') behind the building line of the single or two-family dwelling. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines affirm this criteria and its subsections. The Board preliminarily finds this criterion to be met. (S) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near -identical units. The applicant's Home Design Guidelines affirm this criteria, but do not offer specifics on housing styles. The plans presented by the applicant show that Street 'A' will have a mix of duplexes and single-family houses, that Spear Meadow Road will be primarily duplexes with an entrance to the existing single- family home, and that Vale Drive will have a mix of single-family, duplex, and triplex units fronting on the street. While the triplexes are essentially clustered together on one side of Vale Drive (with a private driveway to the rear), the units are next to and across from single family and duplex units, so there is some degree of co -mingling amongst housing types. The single-family homes on Vale Drive are primarily on the eastern side of the street with a couple single-family units with shared driveways on the western side. E. WAIVERS The applicant initially requested the following waivers: 1. Reduction of the minimum lot size, coverage, and setbacks to allow footprint lots. 2. Reduction of the front yard setback to ten (10) feet, provided that garages are setback a minimum of 25 feet. 3. Reduction of the rear yard setback to 20 feet for new interior lot lines. 4. Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow the clustering of homes. In discussion with the Board the applicant withdrew the request for waiver #1 as unnecessary. The Board preliminarily finds the requested waivers to be in alignment with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District as already discussed in these comments. F. TRAFFIC IMPACT The Board will review traffic impact at the final plat stage of the development review process. 16 #SD-16-18 G. STORMWATER The Stormwater Section provided the following comments to the Board in an email dated August 18, 2016: The Stormwater Section has reviewed the "Spear Meadows" site plan prepared by Lamoureou & Dickinson, dated 616116. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project will disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, this project will need both a construction stormwoter permit and an operational Stormwater permit from the State. 2. The project crosses wetlands in multiple locations and will need a conditional use determination (CUD) from VT DEC. 3. Some of the units back up to the wetlond and associated buffer. Use of this buffer area is regulated under section 12.02 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). The DRB should include a condition that this buffer area not be turned into lawn. 4. The applicant should provide an analysis of the downstream culverts and their ability to poss the 25-year 24-hr (4") storm from the associated upstream drainage area, in accordance with §12.03.E(3) of the City's LDRs. 5. Provide safety fences around each Stormwater pond. 6, A maintenance access and right of way shall extend to each pond from the road. Include curb -cut and gate in the pond fence for vehicle access. 7. Indicate on a plan sheet, the sub -watershed boundaries, as well as drainage areas for ail STPs in accordance with §12.03.D(a) of the City's LDRs. 8. In a future submission, please submit the HydoCAD model file. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, Dave Wheeler The Board concurs with the comments of the Stormwater Section. H. ENERGY STANDARDS The Board notes that all new buildings are subject to the Stretch Code pursuant to Section 3.15: Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs. I. OTHER ISSUES Street 'A' must receive a street name from the Planning Commission. DECISION Motion by Matt Cota, seconded by John Wilking, to approve preliminary plat application #SD-16-18 of The Snyder Group, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations will remain in full effect except as amended herein. 17 #SD-16-18 2. This project must be completed as shown on the preliminary plat plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The applicant must obtain a zoning permit for the first building within six (6) months of this approval. The Development Review Board grants a period of five (5) years for approval of the multi- family buildings. If applicant has not obtained a zoning permit for any of these approved buildings within this five-year period , they will be eligible, per Section 17.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, for one (1) extension to an approval if the application takes place before the approval has expired and if the Development Review Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Development Review Board may specify a period of time up to one (1) year for the extension. 4. Prior to the issuance of a zoning permit for the 32"d dwelling unit, the applicant must record the document entitled, "Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights" and a survey of the area from which the 17 transferable development rights have been severed as required under 24 V.S.A § 4423(b)(4), upon approval of the City Attorney in the South Burlington land records. 5. The applicant must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to use or occupancy of the multi -family dwellings. 6. Future additions of decks, sunrooms, and porches to any single or two-family dwelling units within an approved lot or footprint lot belonging to that unit will require only the issuance of a zoning permit. 7. The applicant must submit legal documents confirming options to purchase the 17 additional development rights for review by the City Attorney with the final plat submission. 8. The applicant must receive preliminary wastewater allocations prior to final plat approval. 9. The applicant must receive final wastewater allocations prior to issuance of any zoning permits. 10. The document entitled, "The Home Design Guidelines Spear Meadow Subdivision" which sets forth the method by which the applicant will comply with the residential design guidelines, must be revised to show the changes below and submitted with the final plat application: a. The document must be dated. b. That duplex and triplex buildings are consider one building for the purposes of the Guidelines. c. Rather than "Buildings should be set back ten feet (10') from the street right of way" the Guidelines will read "Buildings must be set back between ten (10) to twenty-five (25) feet from the street right of way." d. Rather than "Garages shall be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk" the Guidelines will read "Garages shall be set back at least twenty-five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk when facing the street." 11. The Board approves the following waivers: a. Front yard setback of ten (10) feet, provided that garages are setback a minimum of 25 feet if the garage faces the street. b. Rear yard setback of 20 feet for new interior lot lines. 18 lMfflbml-1 ffl c. Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow the clustering of homes. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 13. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations ❑ 14. There shall be no use of herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers within either the wetlands or the associated buffers. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant must record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 15. There will be no mowing within 50 feet of the wetlands on the property. Brush -hogging will be allowed no more than three (3) times per year. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 16. Any stormwater permit required from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Stormwater Division shall be provided to the Administrative Officer prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. 17. The applicant will be responsible for regularly maintaining all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on -site. 18. The plans must be revised to show the all changes below prior to final plat submission: a. Remove water line easement located on UVM property b. Make changes to landscaping plan as suggested by the City Arborist c. Update lighting plan to include street lights 12 to 14 feet in height d. Update plans to include informational signage near wetland buffers which explain the role of the wetlands in the health of the community and property e. Provide typical foundation planting type rendering f. Provide elevations for dwelling units #46 and #47 g. Show snow storage areas on plans h. Respond to and resolve issues identified in the comments of the Champlain Water District i. Respond to and resolve issues identified in the comments of the Stormwater Section j. Update plans to include southbound left hand turn lane on Spear Street k. Provide a phasing plan for landscaping with associated budgeted amounts for each phase I. No parking signs must be shown on the private driveway by which the triplexes will be accessed 19 #SD-16-18 19. The final plat submittal must include E911 addresses for structures in the proposed project, in conformance with local ordinances and Vermont E911 addressing standards. 20. The final plat submission must include a Certificate of Title as required under Section 15.17 of the Land Development Regulations. 21. Final plans shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. 22. For the purposes of the Land Development Regulations, all footprint lots will not be recognized as individual lots, which will result in there being seven (7) lots in this PUD. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 23. The final plat application must be submitted within 12 months of this decision. Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain Not Present David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain Not Present John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of 5— 0 — 1. Signed this 18 day of January 2017, by r Bill Miller, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.477.2241 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. F NOTICE OF APPEAL - EXHIBIT B #M P-16-02 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING THE SNYDER GROUP, INC.-1302, 1340 & 1350 SPEAR STREET MASTER PLAN APPLICATION #MP-16-02 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Master plan application #MP-16-02 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on December 6, 2016. The applicant was represented by Chris Snyder and Andy Rowe. Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, The Snyder Group, Inc., seeks master plan approval for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Spear Meadows, Inc. 3. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. 4. The application was received on November 4, 2016. 5. The plan submitted consists of four (4) pages dated November 1, 2016 and labeled "Master Plan," "Master Plan North," "Master Plan South," and "Master Plan X-Country Utilities & Vale Drive Extension," and one (1) page dated June 6, 2016 and labeled "Master Plan Perimeter Boundary Survey Plat." All plans were prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. A) DENSITY The project involves three (3) existing parcels that will be merged and subdivided into seven (7) lots. The South Burlington Land Development Regulations for the SEQ-NR district allow a maximum base density of 1.2 units per acre and a density of four (4) units per acre with a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). With a TDR, the combined parcels allow for a maximum density of 103 units (25.93 acres x 4=103.7 rounded down to the nearest whole unit), and without a TDR, thirty-one units (25.93 acres x 1.2 units/acre=31.12). The applicant has proposed 48 units (one existing single family and 47 new units), #MP-16-02 which is possible for this parcel with the transfer in of 17 development rights (48 units - 31 existing TDRs=17). B) APPROVAL AND AMENDMENT OF MASTER PLAN Pursuant to Section 15.07(D)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, "any application for amendment of the master plan, preliminary site plan or preliminary plat that deviates from the master plan in any one or more of the following respects, shall be considered a new application for the property and shall require sketch plan review as well as approval of an amended master plan: a) An increase in the total FAR or number of residential dwelling units for the property subject to the master plan; The applicant is seeking approval for 48 dwelling units (one (1) existing and 47 proposed). b) An increase in the total site coverage of the property subject to the master plan; The applicant is seeking a maximum total site coverage of 30%. c) A change in the location, layout, capacity or number of collector roadways on the property subject to the master plan, There are no collector roadways proposed in the Master Plan. d) Land development proposed in any area previously identified as permanent open space in the approved master plan application; and/or The applicant proposes Lot #52 for permanent open space. e) A change that will result in an increase in the number of PM peak hour vehicle trip ends projected for the total buildout of the property subject to the master plan. The application materials state the project will generate 52 P.M. Peak Hour trip ends on the property. C) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (A)(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Utility plans will be submitted as part of subsequent levels of review. (A)(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 2 #M P-16-02 Grading and erosion control information will be submitted as part of subsequent levels of review. (A)(3) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The application materials state the project will generate 52 P.M. Peak Hour trip ends on the property. The Board will review the Traffic Impact Study submitted by the applicant at future stages of the development review process. (A)(4) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The project's layout avoids development in the Class II wetlands and a significant portion of the onsite wetlands will be preserved in the project's designated open space area, which is proposed to be conveyed to the City and may possibly be developed as a park in the future. These will be reviewed in detail at subsequent levels of review. For the purposes of Master Plan, the Board finds this criterion to be met. Conditions attached to this approval and subsequent approvals will provide additional protection: • There shall be no use of herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers within either the wetlands or the associated buffers. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant must record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. • There will be no mowing within 50 feet of the wetlands on the property. Brush -hogging will be allowed no more than three (3) times per year. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. (A)(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The project is located in the City's Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). The Comprehensive Plan states that "there has been a strong interest in building neighborhoods at higher densities in order to conserve more of the SEQ's priority open space lands." The Board finds that this project fulfills this goal because it uses the Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) to increase the density of the project and further conserves open space by proposing duplex and triplex buildings. This criterion will be reviewed in greater detail at subsequent levels of review. (A)(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The project's layout includes open space around the wetland in the south and southwest area of the site and a buffer around a stream bed which traverses the project site as well as adjacent properties. The open 3. # M P-16-02 space abuts open space in the neighboring developments on Pinnacle Drive and Vale Drive. This results in approximately 20 acres of connected, undeveloped space. The Board finds this criterion met. (A)(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Department will review plans during preliminary and final plat stages of review. (A)(8) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. At the level of review of the Master Plan, the Board finds that all the infrastructure and services proposed for this project have been designed in this manner. (A)(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. For Transect Zone subdivisions, this standard shall only apply to the location and type of roads, recreation paths, and sidewalks. At the level of review of the Master Plan, the Board finds that all the infrastructure and services proposed for this project have been designed in this manner. (A)(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The Board finds the project to be aligned with the goals and objectives of the SEQ Zoning District since it will have a greater density of housing through the use of TDRs. In addition, this greater density, combined with the variety of housing styles (single-family, duplex, and triplex) may create more affordable housing options. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes, and proposes actions to address, the chronic shortage of affordable housing in the SEQ. The Board finds that these criteria are met. D) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD requires site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. As discussed above, the Board finds that these standards are met at the Master Plan level. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (2) Parking At the Master Plan level of review, the Board finds that this project can allow for and provide desirable transitions from structure to site and from structure to structure, as well as adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and sufficient parking. These standards will be evaluated in greater detail at later stages of the review process. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. No waivers are sought for height. At the Master Plan level of review, the Board finds this criterion met. This standard will be evaluated in greater detail at later stages of the review process. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Utility plans will be submitted as part of applications for subsequent levels of review. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. At the Master Plan level, the Board finds that this project can comply with this criterion. The Board will consider consistency with these criteria in more detail during subsequent levels of review of the application. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications must meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Board does not consider the reservation of land to be necessary except that the irrevocable offers of dedication for the northern end of Vale Drive and southern end of Street A must extend to the property line. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The Board will consider compliance with these standards at subsequent levels of review. D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13.06) Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening is required for all uses subject to planned unit development review. The Board will consider compliance with these criteria during subsequent levels of review. E. Modification of Standards The applicant is not requesting any modifications to the standards outlined in Section 14.07(A-D) at this time. F. Low Impact Development This criterion will be reviewed at subsequent levels of review. G. Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation Compliance with these criteria will be reviewed at subsequent levels of review. E) SOUTHEAST QUADRANT This proposed subdivision is located in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning District. Therefore, it is subject to the provisions of Section 9 of the SBLDR. 9.06 Dimensional and Design Requirements Applicable to All Sub -Districts. The following standards shall apply to development and improvements within the entire SEQ: A. Height. (1) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, or SEQ-NR sub- district shall not exceed forty-five feet (45'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. (2) The maximum height of any occupied structure in the SEQ-VR or SEQ-VC sub -district shall not exceed fifty feet (50'); the waiver provisions of Section 3.07(E) shall not apply to occupied structures in these sub -districts. The Board will evaluate compliance with these standards at subsequent levels of review. B. Open Space and Resource Protection. (1) Open space areas on the site shall be located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating usable, contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels #MP-16-02 This topic has been covered already in these comments. For the purposes of Master Plan, the Board finds this project meets this criterion. (2) Building lots, streets and other structures shall be located in a manner consistent with the Regulating Plan for the applicable sub -district allowing carefully planned development at the average densities provided in this bylaw. The average density remains below the maximum that could be permitted in the sub -district, and the location of development areas are consistent with the standards. The Board finds that for the Master Plan level of review, the project meets these standards. (3) A plan for the proposed open spaces and/or natural areas and their ongoing management shall be established by the applicant. The applicant proposes to convey the parcel denoted as Lot #52 on the site plan, which is 6.8 acres, to the City for use as public open space that may be developed into a park to meet the active and passive recreational needs of South Burlington's residents. If the City accepts that parcel for use as public open space then the City would be responsible for its management. Prior to final plat approval, applicant must obtain the City Attorney's approval of legal documents related to open space and, prior to issuance of a zoning permit, must record the legal documents approved by the City Attorney in the South Burlington Land Records. The Board finds that for the Master Plan level of review, this criterion has been met. (4) Sufficient grading and erosion controls shall be employed during construction and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. In making this finding, the Development Review Board may rely on evidence that the project will be covered under the General Permit for Construction issued by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. (5) Sufficient suitable landscaping and fencing shall be provided to protect wetland, stream, or primary or natural community areas and buffers in a manner that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding landscape. Chain link fencing other than for agricultural purposes shall be prohibited within PUDs; the use of split rail or other fencing made of natural materials is encouraged. These criteria will be reviewed at subsequent levels of review. C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. The easterly portion of the project, according to the applicant, has been in agricultural use with a rotation of crops over the past several years. The applicant has not provided information regarding the agricultural production values of the land as currently used. By developing the property with housing the agricultural use will cease. The Board considers the use of TDRs means the property will support additional density 7 #M P-16-02 onsite and preserve land from development elsewhere in the SEQ, which is a significant goal of the Comprehensive Plan. The Board finds that this criterion has been met. D. Public Services and Facilities. In the absence of a specific finding by the Development Review Board that an alternative location and/or provision is approved for a specific development, the location of buildings, lots, streets and utilities shall conform with the location of planned public facilities as depicted on the Official Map, including but not limited to recreation paths, streets, park land, schools, and sewer and water facilities. (1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity shall be available to meet the needs of the project in conformance with applicable State and City requirement, as evidenced by a City water allocation, City wastewater allocation, and/or Vermont Water and Wastewater Permit from the Department of Environmental Conservation. A condition of final plat approval will be that prior to receiving a zoning permit the applicant will need to obtain whichever of the permits listed above are necessary for the site. (2) Recreation paths, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. (3) Recreation paths, utilities, sidewalks, and lighting shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. At the level of review of the Master Plan, the Board finds all the infrastructure and services proposed for this project have been designed in this manner. (4) The plan shall be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. The Fire Department will review plans during preliminary and final plat stages of review. E. Circulation. The project shall incorporate access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unsafe conditions on adjacent roads and sufficient to create connectivity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles, school transportation, and emergency service vehicles between neighborhoods. In making this finding the Development Review Board may rely on the findings of a traffic study submitted by the applicant, and the findings of any technical review by City staff or consultants. (1) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent properties. (2) Roads shall be designed in a manner that is consistent with City roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. (3) The provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4) related to connections between adjacent streets and neighborhoods shall apply. #M P-16-02 At the level of review of the Master Plan, the Board finds all the infrastructure and services proposed for this project have been designed in this manner. 9.07 Regulating Plans A. C. ... D. Parks Design and Development. (1) General standards. The SEQ has an existing large community park, the Dorset Street Park Complex. Parks in the SEQ may be programmed as neighborhood parks or mini -parks as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Mini parks in the SEQ should be a minimum of 10,000 square feet, with programming approved by the South Burlington Recreation Department. Such parks are to be located through the neighborhoods in order to provide a car free destination for children and adults alike, and to enhance each neighborhood's quality of life. They shall be knitted into the neighborhood fabric as a focal point in the neighborhood, to add vitality and allow for greater surveillance by surrounding homes, local streets and visitors. Each park should be accessible by vehicle, foot, and bicycle and there should be a park within a quarter -mile of every home. (2) Specific Standards. The following park development guidelines are applicable in the SEQ- NRT, SEQ-NR, SEQ-VR, and SEQ-VC districts: a. Distribution and Amount of Parks: i. A range of parks and open space should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation. ii. Parks should serve as the focus for neighborhoods and be located at the heart of residential areas, served by public streets and fronted by development. iii. Parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program. iv. A neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one -quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned developed recreation area. b. Dedication of Parks and Open Space: Parks and protected open space must be approved by City Council for public ownership or management, or maintained permanently by a homeowners' association in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. c. Design Guidelines i. Parks should be fronted by homes and/or retail development in order to make them sociable, safe and attractive places. ii. Parks should be located along prominent pedestrian and bicycle connections. iii. To the extent feasible, single -loaded roads should be utilized adjacent to natural open spaces to define a clear transition between the private and public realm, and to reinforce dedicated open space as a natural resource and not extended yard areas. The applicant is prepared to convey a 6.8 acre parcel to the City for open space and possible development into a park. The open space contains significant areas of Class 11 wetlands, which may limit #M P-16-02 its development into a park. It is located in the southern portion of the project site, would have homes nearby (existing and proposed), and would abut other open space. While the open space would not be located at the center of the proposed development, it would connect the proposed development and existing neighborhoods, which could access it via sidewalks or on bicycle. The amount of land, 6.8 acres, as compared to the number of possible residents in the proposed development (2.19 people/avg. household x 48 units=105.12 people) far exceeds the standard of 7.5 acres/1,000 residents or 0.0075 acres/person (0.0075 acres/person x 105.12 residents=0.79 acres). Given the size of the proposed open space, it could serve many more people than those located in the proposed development. At the level of review for the Master Plan, the Board finds these criteria met. This standard will be further reviewed in subsequent stages of the review process. 9.08 SEQ-NR &NRT Sub -District; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub -district has additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 500 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. Vale Drive is uninterrupted for a span of greater than 500 feet. The Board finds that mid -block sidewalk and/or recreation path connections are possible given the design shown at the Master Plan level of review. This criterion will be reviewed in greater detail at later stages of the review process. This issue is also discussed in the section of this decision pertaining to waiver requests. (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). The northern portion of the extended Vale Drive and Street 'A' are presently depicted as dead ends; however, the streets will extend to the property line and may at some point in the future be continued and/or connected to other roadway systems. The Board finds these criteria met. This issue is also discussed in the section of this decision pertaining to waiver requests. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. See discussion above. (4) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1.2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 10 #M P-16-02 The presently existing lots are to be merged then subdivided into seven (7) new lots; however, the requirement for a minimum ratio of 1:2 is not applicable in this circumstance, because the project is a PUD and the lots being created will not be used as lots for individual houses, but for housing clusters. The purpose of the minimum lot ratio is to ensure a certain form and pattern in development. However, this project is proposed as a PUD and incorporates an innovative approach that clusters multiple housing units on the created lots. The Board finds this criterion met. This issue is also discussed in the section of this decision pertaining to waiver requests. B. Street, Sidewalk & Parking Standards (1) Street dimensions and cross sections. Neighborhood streets (collector and local) in the NR sub -district are intended to be low -speed streets for local use that discourage through movement and are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Dimensions for public collector and local streets shall be as set forth in Tables 9-1 and 9-2, and Figures 9-4 and 9-5 of the SBLDR. (2) Sidewalks. (a) Sidewalks must be a minimum of five feet (5') in width with an additional minimum five-foot planting strip (greenspace) separating the sidewalk from the street. (b) Sidewalks are required on one side of the street. (3) Street Trees; see Section 9.08(B)(3) (a) Street trees are required along all streets in a planting strip a minimum of five feet wide. (b) Street tress shall be large, deciduous shade trees with species satisfactory to the City Arborist. Street trees to be planted must have a minimum caliper size of 2.5 to 3 inches DBH, and shall be planted no greater than thirty feet (30') on center. (4) On -street parking. Sufficient space for one lane of on -street parking shall be provided on all streets except for arterials outside of the SEQ-VC and SEQ-VR sub -districts. This requirement may be waived within the SEQ-NRN sub -district provided the DRB finds sufficient off-street parking has been provided to accommodate the parking needs of the uses adjacent to the street. (5) Intersection design. Intersections shall be designed to reduce pedestrian crossing distances and to slow traffic. (6) Street and sidewalk lighting. Pedestrian -scaled light fixtures (e.g., 12' to 14') shall be provided sufficient to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces. Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the lower -intensity development patterns and character of the SEQ, with lower, smoother levels of illumination (rather than hot -spots) and trespass minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety. The Board finds that the design of the project as proposed at Master Plan could meet the above criteria and will evaluate compliance with these criteria at later stages of the review process. C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas ... A minimum of thirty- five percent (35%) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented to the 11 south... (2) Building FaVades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings should beset back a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk. (b) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages with a vehicle entrance that faces a front lot line, the facade of the garage that includes the vehicle entrance must be set back a minimum of eight feet (8') behind the building line of the single or two-family dwelling. (5) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near -identical units. The criteria above will be evaluated at subsequent levels of review for the project. G. OTHER ISSUES Street 'A' must receive a street name from the Planning Commission. DECISION Motion by Matt Cota, seconded by Jennifer Smith, to approve Master Plan application #MP-16-02 of The Snyder Group, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations will remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 3. There shall be no use of herbicides, pesticides, and/or non -organic fertilizers, within either the wetlands or the associated buffers. This restriction must be reflected in the association documents which must be reviewed by the City Attorney Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant must record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 4. There will be no mowing within 50 feet of the wetlands on the property. Brush -hogging will be allowed no more than three (3) times per year. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the first building on the property, the applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Conditions" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney. 12 #M P-16-02 5. The plans must be revised to show the changes below and require approval of the Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans must be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to or with the submission of the final plat application. a. Update the plan page labeled "Master Plan" to show the proposed path and proposed sidewalk easements which are represented on the plan pages labeled "Master Plan North" and "Master Plan South." Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Motion carried by a vote of 5— 0 — 1. Signed this 18 day of January 2017, by r Bill Miller, Chair IUnt Prcccnt Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.477.2241 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 13 Interested Persons Record and Service List Soutkimuuj I ingtm I Ven140N7 Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). _ _ A , �# HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME El EMAIL ADDRESS WO MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST jvC>iAA:F4,KJt'�C% v� /' L� Ply f Ot�U fcl '�f ' L/ V l t; r n V\IJ Q C-- �j 1- L"�- :P,F southbit rl, i Itgum VERHON'f Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). NEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST P,j*Qp Cis i A �Fc_--xv; 44 N E© Vt:- Rz . U i - , 7 P N-& , ea,!cj�; UT `'emu airle /N 45 d. " CIA he ►�. , S c-=�`�'✓�/ P C� . ace cC� S;�J d �a , y �1 n � � rd o tN 1 , , 1 �� owl G f� G �'► iG ; co VI-7 I a,1 W-W south uirli �t(on V fin Id 0 N T Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c), -� HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST t ti %� ►C,AACL .S(,& LL S �CU���,�,'S (�n1`l�'�'�'�� �,ttj?1.�{%,(!ri?� i�'�r1. i'��(`�ULA 10 + �;�r� A ,I ff�.fG't.,)� C ` •���� �� ts Z-c�c.t t-/ Revised 9/2010 R4j�.- j Interested Persons Record and Service List south mwl i llglot '.i E F M 0 Ni Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: Aq,�/� PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST _TAN,, Iv10101S j}��trfyJ IdIF� ��u�cc' (,c,,t� L,� Lci�c S �_�-�. .. �_• st A U 'n 17 �f�� in'1((�p�-v� L ^'1I ���tiK. C^� e���—�i-�'Cv-N► Gl of '1�21 �j ri 5X�- ttG� tllC i:�V r,�liii �G�s✓ %fit � �r'u2/ � � �; 5 v��J `Zv �, Q` ��V (CCU �,��� ? �I �S Y fi.� ilt roe �' _° Q��l�'�'1 U U2t%1, i Pair southbtk rfin ton Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). I , / / HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �,J p� I����L V •����� � J� �(7J�I�I�I�iKI� ��. t� •C©� ZL• �`ttc���e� L19 �1c �� .� 4d,1� � �r i G.-� An ar'r o e' Q w� �r g o� C.0 1--t L&.4. t,I 124 5 SP ¢-et,2 S'. Igo I ` ��{� �.(, V� ���1�/(�'�✓��ll ��(�-Vf��/'�M-C �� , c' I yU-7c < �_C''J �.✓ 11 � � J —. �lt . i /2!ir�L'r (J( �Aq �^� V \ {j,,./ 4 IvY VL - I Revised 9/2010 Interested Persons Record and Service List south M. . VC Fi H0 NE Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST r1 a Revised 912010 Interested Persons Record and Service List southbudiiatiton CY V EN RI ON Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). _ _ , HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST i r V � v W f �1��6� �tc+ tQ✓� �� aSo►n y,1,c ^^ C'k0-Y(o cL 4 0'(- f (G 110 C f�C� c1� n L �. , y���I I..,� �''�I• �.� r ��� U7 K� j fit .,l r�rt��.�� �� e �� L-"ry -V r)ndl Y /v %� U S� lon Revised 912010 T �y southburhuffto Cy V r-n M 0 HT Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 1 rJ P � tVVq) LYE L,_j_,► i GA.t;_r- I'Ly JV,11/I1. -e4v'1l«_C�.`c',�i�ylC7o,1"JCX v +�v YU (c'7Z�� L' V A.( �<'r .+, Q-41"-�t '.) �CY <r `��^•3f �1/ �.i �`J��� �+' ��`��I �l.�� �� �--- U f � f F SKY southbuilft-i to EAMONT Interested Persons Record and Service List Revised 912010 Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME EMAIL ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST �Jr�fIhJi);"jMOP AA)c�-Y ' - «i ���e �._�;�-, , tF�_ ,>, r �� .2l 7>Le� ��.F�� 71 i Ste' l I l I 1 \ l� 1� ` �� ( l �Q ( I (.t_ 1 7 ( �� 1'i r �/ f;i% r 1 f ��-AQ�i1% �J- u i�1 � d 1,(' Y C i I � ASTRONOMIC I ' s Shand et al / I I 10' WIDE PAYED PAM M. and M. Scollins I I - I 1160-00214 - � - - a'p a e GRAPHIC SCALE I T. and L. - - Open Space S ear 0 T'u a ao eo o zoo 1160-00219 — — P D' WIDE SIDEWALK 18' Pinnacle of SINGLE FAMILY HOME ' i incM1 =eon 10- WIDE PAYED PATH 1 � ON FOOTPRINT LOT — " ` 7�-_ � P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - 14 VALEm 1645-00069 C - 11 F� V PROPOSED / - - ► Larkin/Milot Partnership 6 1 °c 1 O O O O O "' - - 1742-00033 I 7 PUBLIC PARK ' (1.4 AC.) pUBLiC STREET V I - I %QAO [NEIGHBORHOOD 26VALE DRIVE 15 I / N U GARDENS oOOI00 ..- 1DZ NED � . U STORM WATER W I 125 _ - - �-"NOV 1 6 2015 4 �,z n TYPICAL TRIPLEX f 25 1 G�'.. \\\ A - '� L NEW CROSSWALK AT FLATS ;©• MAPD`AcNDS 11' S. CURB BUMPOUTS — _ _ �i' 0' CI}�i Of S0, Burlington Q I DEBfN h m _ . •.• .• �] \��__ --_;-' - :� .--- • .OPEN SPACE •' • • . \ WETLANDS DELINEATED BY WILLIAM D COUNTRYMAN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 14 UNITS (FOOTPRINT LOTS) TRIPLEX FLATS 18 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 18 UNITS TOTAL 51 UNITS I Spear Meadows, Inc. 18 -- —_' ' i 1640-1340 — /. i \ .. _ .. _ .•... _ OPEN SPACE + i 32 30 31 1 / 43 I i 9 45� Imo`, 1 46 47 p TOWNHOUSE LEX TYPICAL TRIPLEX • ATFOR�LE / pE DRIVE TOWNHOUSE T 48 ,� I OPEN SPACE � 36 37 / 49 I PINNACLE AT SPEAR I / W. and M. Gilbert 26' i ® 1� 1640-01400 50 NEW /I 38 35 • 26' WIDE BIT. 1 __-____ ,_ • ,,., n,• ,,,,,,,, N / / / / CONC. ROAD WI _ - • / CONCRETE CURB — • • r I — K. SAWTELLE // o • - _ — i .I / 1e40= o� o I 39 LOT 1 / ---, - • 1350 SPEAR LLC 1640-01350 / T I I I • I" �' G. Far ell ; _ • ® / /, 1 - _ 40- 1302r • ` � , 'I r � � 1 ly • � l %I /�-- L , I i i I I � lI/ • - - ` ` \\ ` ` 11 � J --- ,� D. Muhr , I L. and D. Youngl lsao-olaas M. Dendcer I O _\ 1640-01 02 I I • 1640-01430 \ • ' �1 I G. andJ. Farrell i I,',' �l R.jand T. i/ • / — - I%olume 142, Page9 45-47 1 / I t�,� I Ll T \ aes errant I I `±2.9 s, � I _ C. and B. • / / 1840-01404 �[�. and C. Franzo Marroquin ni I 1640-01406 1640-01295 C C NEW SPEAR S1REE�i6 V V PAVEIAENT VAD t01 MATCN CONSTRUCTED / EX ROAD STRUCTURAL SECTON ,, / I PEAR MEADOW R. and T. Avonda \ _ I 1640-01317 \ SP�q SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lavigne R NOVEMBER 15, 2015 ASTRONOMIC GRAPHIC SCALE 0 1xo Im1�I I incM1 = W A. 10' N1DE PAKD PATH P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot 1645-00089 ._'E--PARCEL 4 STORM WATER ARE BASIN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS 1 M. and M. Scollins 1160-00214 II SINGLE FAMILY HOME 6' WIDE SIDEWALK ON FOOTPRINT LOT 9 30 D(A) 50 © O -_ PL C. Shand at al I 0570-01225 / I 10' WIDE PAVED PATH rao__ ------ T. and L. Kleh - — 1160-00219 _ Open Space 18, Pinnacle at Spear VALE D IWIVE PROPOSED / :' • / VALE DRIVE - - 15 ouo - 1 18 17 16 (19) 1 3 n ® I 22 TYPICAL TRIPLEX. NEW CROSSWALK AT FLATS CURB BUMPOUTS 1 Spear Meadows, Inc. 18 1640-1340, �• k 30 1 31 1132 j ®1� TYPICAL TRIPLEX PRNATE pRIVE TOWNHOUSE 1 —4- 1 , W. and M. Gilbert 6 35 1 ® 14 \ ` _` 1640-01400 1 NEW 26' WIDE BIT. -- -- CONC. RDA D W/ . CONCRETE CURB LOT 1 _ . 1350 SPEAR LLC 1640-01350 1 40- 1302; � ` � � � it - I , • , / / I - �j- EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 14 UNIT (FOOTPRINT LOTS) I - . " .— - +'. ' •'f TRIPLEX FLATS 18 UNITS OPEN SPACE TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 18 UNITS _! a 1 - TOTAL 51 UNITS I �� � .•-- - I� 37 1 36 1 , /I / K. SAWTELLE 1 1 1640-01300 1 i 40� IF G. Fa ell O C. and B. ' • Marroquin 1640-01295 1 ` 0 by G. and J. Farrell I%olume 14Z Pages 45-47 1 i R. and T. Avonda 1640-01317 ` ±2.9acres N SPEAR STREEN\ NS'TRUCTED 01 MATCN \ \ ROAD STRUCTURAL SECTON R. and E. Lavigne STRE \ ET PUBLIC PARK ! ' '' C, Larkin/Milot Partnership " (1.4 AC.) ° 1742-00033 1 [NEIGHBORHOOD ,`•'v 21-1 GARDENS Z 10 RECEIVED ji �, • ' :O• • . • • . GAPRED' �N $sS .If .w- • • Y(� City of So. Burlington ::: OPEN $PACE WETLANDS DELINEATED BY •`• . •• WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN 42 1 45 / TYPICAL TRIPLEX PRE 1 47 TOWNHOUSE ArF�Ri� 4- '/ I OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR I • • I I I L t-_j I D. Muhr ` L. and D. Youngl I-- / 1640-01408 M. Dencker / 1640-011402 • • — 1640-01430 "JR1and T. I ; / / — — Tarrant I I r _� 11540-01404 ' I-, and C. Franzoni i 1640-01406 r I I ' SPEAR MEADOWS I I I I I I /I I I I II I II III SKETCH PLAN NOVEMBER 15' 2015 ASTRDNOAryC I C. Shand et al I 0570-01225 10' HIDE PAVED PATH / M. and M. Scollins _ _ *_ - - a o 1 1160-00214 _ - - _ _ - _ GRAPHIC SCALE T. and L. Kleh - a e _ 120 zw I 1160-00219 _ _ _ Open Space ffi 5' VOTE SIDEWALK 18, Pinnacle at Spear "I R 1 SINGLE FAMILY HOME ° VOTE PAVED PAN ON FOOTPRINT LOT --�- ' P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot . _ 1645-00089 _ .' PALE FIVE s eO PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK !' p (1.4 AC.) 01742-00033 Larkin/Milot Partnershi O1 O ® O C - PUBLIC STREET 26' -- m oc VALE DRIVE 15 ' NEIGHBORHOOD , N 000000 Ev' 17 1 _ GARDENS /mr� E�- PARCEL4 - 1 1s 1 1s I .: mo ! ECENED U STOR_ M WATER AR 'a1 © 21 Q 19) I ems' 1 h 2 _ _ _ --�' NOV 16 2015 TYPICAL TRIPLEX I_ I� - NEW CROSSWALK AT FLATS — /. `, . • . • VAOI+ED- L•Ass x .� ' ' �O- Q I CURB BUMPOUTS 4TLA%D _ _ 0 S- iBASWN � m o City of So. Burlington �_:OPEN SPACE . • ` •�• • • • ' WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 14 UNITS (FOOTPRINT LOTS) TRIPLEX FLATS 18 UNITS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 18 UNITS TOTAL 51 UNITS 11 _ �• •'` .' • ; • WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN Spear Meadows, Inc. 1640-134018 _ _ — •� OPEN SPACE 42 , 1 1 ®tl 1 46 L TYPICAL TRIPLEX pR'v / 47 TOWNHOUSE pRNATE GRIVE TOWNHOUSE 'gTEpR�V F 48 I OPEN SPACE 37 PINNACLE AT SPEAR / W. and M. Gilbert 26' 35 1 ® 1 J -.._ i .� I c 40 -- 01400 50 ' ,NEW 21' WIDE BIT. 1 - • • i CONC. ROAD W/ ;p� • °.. , CONCRETE CURB � • / K. SAWTELLE / 1640-01300 I I 39 S� �/ - - - • LOT 1 - T 1350 SPEAR LLC -7 • / G. Far ell /' 40 a 1640-01350y- 40- 1302, AS D. Muhr \ ` 9t11 L. and D. Youngl I--� i -/ M. Dencker O - \ Ci 1640-01408 j \ 1 - - / / ,�,� / 1640-011402 I • ` Q' I` Ab 11 G. andJ. Farrell , / ,, I ; JR.'and T. I • / — _ — 1640-01430 'Volume 14Z Pages 4547 1 / I I :. ±2.9 acres / i I 1 aimnt I / C. and B. • / I I I 1- � Marroquin 1 \ , ` �� ��' 1 I 1640-01404 P. and C. Franzoni j I 1640-01295 /_ - , _� // I I I I 1640-01406 I I II NEW SPEAR S7REET PAVEMENT "OEN'Vt \ I I CaNSTRucTED TO 14AATCH \ I I I I PEAR MEADOW smucnRAE secnoN ' 'i R. and T. AVOnda Ex R°"° '\ � -\ ' I I ' 1640-01317 SPE,O ' ; ; I ; / i i ; i SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lavigne NOVEMBER 15, 2015 C. Shand et al ASTRONOMIC I I I 0570-01225 / ® 1 10' WIDE PAYED PATH � M. and M. Scollins- i 1160-00214 I - � - - r a •O- -a e _ _ — _-- GRAPHIC SCALE I T. and L. Kleh — - - 60 U ,za Yw I 11T30-00219 _ _ _ �' Open Space e e' HIDE SIDEWALK 18• Pinnacle of Spear SINGLE FAMILY HOME °^ °^ m "DE PAVED PATH ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot 1645-0008e 12 k ' - VALE® DRIVE s PROPOSED O a © /� rshiprki/MPUBLIC PARK - _ . (1.4 AC.) •� 17a2-00033 r STREET P f PUBLIC o VALE DRIVE q5 ' NEIGHBORHOOD 000000 — �0 GARDENS m cis c°) `iV PARCEL 4 21 — 19 18 17:o�,m p m , STORM WATER AR c I © q w I ® 22 - - - _..___ _.. NOV 1 2015 I -TYPICAL TRIPLEX NEW CROSSWALK .�.`_`.`.`: `_(,'."..... T .G1 ::f�(j:•�. — FLATS _ MAPPE LANI)SS,II` . �'I 0 S0. Burlington Q I o B>� � � CURB BUMPOUTS _ _ W� LAND§. - .OPEN SPACE WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS i , WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN --_-- I — — ` EXISTING LOT 1 uNlr i _ . Spear Meadows, Inc. — _ — -- — — _ " _ 18 1640-1340. _ — SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 14 UNITS (FOOTPRINT LOTS) �." ^: 1`��— -- — -4 —_ F TRIPLEX FLATS 18 UNITS OPEN SPACE TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 18 UNITS II 30 11 32 43 / / 07 45 TOTAL 51 UNITS / 46 TYPICAL 47 TRIPLEX - / TYPICAL TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSE � �°iQN O II ' PRn/pTE DRIVE TOWNHOUSE 'a1FpR�VE - 48 I OPEN SPACE 37 36 / 49 1 PINNACLE AT SPEAR A- / W. and M. Gilbert ' I 26 35 1 ® i _ 1640-01400 _ 50 / \ 38 NEW 26' WIDE Bn. CONC ROAD W/ CONCRETE CURB - K. SAWTELLE I ��� �Q . _ _- - - •' < 1640-01300 I �- � LOT 1 1350 SPEAR LLC 40 I(� 1640-01350 - I G. Far ell ;' -. -_ 40- 1302l� ,1 / I I I j'7 r / I t8 I I I _ / o Q, p I i / ,' �,� L. and D. YOung I--� 1640-0140s M. Dencker I � µ 11 0 \ @�,'I G. andJ. Farrell / / ��/� 1640-011402 � I I I I � � _ _ 1640-01430 I _ 0 i / %olumeTa2, Pages as-aT �' i �,/�/� II R-./and T. I � � � C. and B. s +2.9 acres L Tarrant Manoquin 1 A //�/ i ? 40-01404 IP. and C. Franzoni T _ 1640-01295 I 'i— I I i t 1640-01406 / C NEW SPEAR STREET MEADOWS PAVEMENT WIDENT NGACN \ \ I I ISPEAR CONSTRUCTED TO MM T`°°" R. and T. Avonda 11 EK ROAD S 1 RUCTURAL,I SKETCH PLAN � �� I III I S'/J I lsao-o13n _ E l R. and E. Lavigne AR ST { NOVEMBER 15 , 2015 �I PT Grid 4 I 1 I ®WB1 I G.E. oNTo01IMS — _ - I 11900 OPENBPAOE Q BIEBER I fRNNACLEO I 7a9•W 12 lOT I yOfATIPEAR / I 1T12dDOZ6 LOT 53 - � PROPOSED OW RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED _ -� � PROPOSED LOT 51 I E ( RESIOFNIIAL LOT 49 UVMa$TATE I PROPOSED �eD AGRICULTURCOLLEGE BTORMWATER / ' AL LOT 5 OPEN SPACE PINNACLE ATSPEAR m-1 L Wild I. � BONLAtm TRUar 1 Z11AND _T/&00Q4� `; ` sawEnuoeursat cLAI/:wER wD - LOT 57 — 1 P�P�ED PCCF98TODPENSPACE . , I / REBIDHlIML (y PT-5-2-1 1 « s ET p W. GHLBEERT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE l _ (FUTURE PARK) f I EEE LOT 49 �j LOT 50 / RE9�10°POEB PROPOSED _ • g 1 J,,m,ay Q RESIDENDAL EXISTING GARAGE • SJE /`// 16101117a0 • — I/ 1 O LOT 48 RESIDEnTTNOnAL • �/ L/ • / xMRA(1E TO BE RµD I-- • 'I 1 I TARwwT • 164041404 E)wnNI Housk / / 70 ROMANMUNR� \ • 1a ll ��il \ LiD. YOla401j —,J MU1IIa0110a ` 1E1Sa4o: I I I � I 16116.14111 • • I M. DENCIQR _ MARIt0001N I 1.loman \ I I I (j III I i/ I � `1 II II I II I 040L,91 I 111140,011193 I I � \ 1 CONSTRUCTION _ PHASE 2 F---28 DWELLING UNITS i CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 20 DWELLING UNITS 1 U � � ❑ 1 ED I CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN N.T.S. SEU-CiRP ROADSADS AS SH G AB SHOWN ON THEOFFICIAICmMAP � ,'- VNP SECS-N� _._..... __... ...,.-.... PROPORDPATR OR TMILA/MIDWNON ITNIAMJI A�,. G4WNFL „il!•PPwVL CRY LAM Q B Y ,lV R I I i ZONING DATA NOTES— NG DATA TAKEN FROM THE SOUTH BUR ZONING MAP AND THE CITY W B WTH BURLINGTON OFFICIAL CITY MAP N.T.S. ZONING DATA: TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBER - 1B40-1340 ZONING DISTRICT - SOUTHEAST QUADRANT - NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL - MR OVERLAY DISTRICTS- WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER DORSET PARK VIEW PROTECTION ZONE PROJECTPARCELAREA 19.13 AC. 0 VELOPMENTAREA B BOAC. PUSUCOPENSPACE 2593AC. TOTAL PROJECT PARCEL AREA RESIDENTIAL DENSITY 1 EXISTING DWELLING LUNGNITS PRO O RETAINED 48 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 340,000 SF (STREETS, ROOFTOP, DRIVEWAYS. & WALKS) VEHICLE TRIP ENDS MAXIMUM PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS • 52 PEAK HOUR TRIPS PARKING SPACES 98 PARKING SPACES D SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT - GARAGE AND/OR DRVEWAY) 12 VISITOR PARKING SPACES E SPACES PER 4 DWELLING UNITS IN DRIVE OR ONSTREET) 4 PARKING SPACE FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 112 TOTALPARKINGSPACES $TREE T INFORMATION VALE DRIVE EDBLIC STREET WITH 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 26 FEET WIDE, 1B FEET WIDE AT WETLAND CROSSING SPEARU EADOW ROAD PUBLIC STREET WITH 10' WIDE PAVED PATH 26 FEET WDE, 18 FEET WIDE AT WETLAND CROSSING STREET. FUNRE PUBLIC STREET WITH 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 24 FEET WIDE 1. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED FOR MASTER PUIN REVIEW OILY LANDOWNER: SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1340SPEARSTREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT OROS APPLICANT: THE SNYGER GROUP, INC. 4076 SHELBURNE RCAD, SUITE e SHELBURNE. VT M482 LOCATION PLAN N T.S SOILS MAP C COVINGTONVI.TYCLAY D OA9 N.T.S. GBCB— GEORGIA STONY LOAM C .24 Lh LIVINGSTON CLAY D a49 NO. MASSENASTONYSILTLOAM C a20 .S VERGENNES CLAY D 0.49 GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 1. 200 41 (in leap 1 inch =100 R. REVISIONS THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD I OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS 0 SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY 0 FINAL El RECORD DRAWING na. SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 E— IVeY A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ADR MASTER PLAN OJ13 date 11-01-16 LAMOUREUgi & O, ON scale AS NOTED Inc. 14 M..D Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Dnve nt. no Eeeex Junction, VT 05452 Tot: 802-8784450 '� EXISTING HO EAND GARAGE TO REMO//ED / J8p\ u \ 38? \ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY I , _�.L_ r I I I eITHE O PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION , �E�S�HEDET4 \ / ao l 84 303 \ 388 \ EROPO$ED UTLITY J � ! J! STORMWATER POND �"'y- •.•\ I / I � 1 , 1 J ( I X '•-.\ \ �/ / �} J 3eB \ - - I ,\ ( WATER d\I DRM N STA. 21+00 TCH LINE x MA1 1 t I J PROPOSEDI } RESIDENTIAU PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL t' ......./ 35313 1 ... \ PROPOSED ; 3 1 RESIDENTIAL y END DEFINED PROPOSED m CHANNEL RESIDENTIAL m �rn�^ li A � � B2',� � � aez `'1 1 _ 1 1 •1 '! I � ���.. .�++r ,�•� I f /���/ � J _r f EASEME PROPO PATN ( i ROAD/ ` ........ ... I ` M I 3BB : -'.. �.. .. ...� / r ......... .. .._.._.,...._.. � \ ` ` I $ I 1 39B —.— .1 _ __� _ 3BB ,. 39- OBf I / If WDEU1ILITYEASEMENTTO' ' ,tl:°0� / � HdAEOWNERS ASSOCIATON or 1 NEW DPoVEWATO _��—_—EXISTNGHW'E ( ` \ - •\ w I I ) / , ) CD LOT 48 I / �/ \, �_ \\ '>< 'SFEREAN^iTY I ! I P) J 1 � DLASS2 WEIIAND OT 53 e RESIDENTIAL \ pqRO '. \ ,p STREAM Pl • St 1 J RE �EEOD',, fOS SIDE S / EXIST. HOUSE STA. 24+00 (� s / / ! ! \t MATCH LINE m PROPOSED I RESIDENT I — � /LOT UU OPOS -D AL RESIDENTI REVISIONS \\ �' SEE SHEET 3 THESE PLAN$ e N UTEA REVISNNS SHOULD 0 OF \ i \ I ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHDn GELD% SHEETS \ I O SKETCH/CONCEPT 0 PRELIMINARY I ) ` E] FINAL \\ ~\ LD RECORD DRAWING I \ ) , ) pro} no. SPEAR MEADOWS 14008 NOTE: A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT surwy L&D 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON de8ign \ ABR / J , 2. GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED drawn BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). MASTER PLAN ABFhIR tl \\ NORTH DJG }\\ dole EXISTING HOUSE AND \�' ( \ 11-01-16 OARAtiE 10 EE REMOVED GRAPHIC SCALE style Izo LAMOUREUX&OICHINSON AS NOTED Consulting Engineers, Inc. SM. no. \ ! OI 14 Mone Drive / Essex Junction VT 05452 • ••! On ree9 Tel: 802-878-9H50 2 � i �-= `--�� r_l ��� rr•-..,_ir-...-....___,-..__� SEE SHEET4_ __ r ) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'D IGSAFE' PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION yr c,u . — I PROPOSED PATH EASEMENT .- " "- _ .--'—• — r Lors3 -� ) ------ " me ^^ /' --' • Chi%N _L Mq PROPOSEDSIDEWMI( EASEMEIR — 396 J / R s oPOSTIA h i l J P I �•�y, RESIDENTIAt _ r PROPOSED I � •f f — r `-' — 39 — RESIDENTIAL I ___ / ' - _ LO , �-10 / t % RESIDENTAL i + . ,s LOT 51 \` . w Z� J l PROPOSED _ U — PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL / // 7 RESIDENTIAL D�az"�ETu"° PROPOSED —3e2— / / LOT 52 RESIDENTIAL � � / ''� SEE SHEET 2 C — 3N0�— — _ _ — — _ _ -- . — . PUBLIC OPEN SPACE —892 END DEFINED CHANFEL r' 1 ..�. .. ..[�.. ------------ cus52wETUND — l — —_EE f gf9b 2 �/Al— I I \ / I �TOOPEN9PACE I PROPOSED NCCESS _ �1T I LOT 52 IPUBLIC > OPEN SPACE I 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 nn 120 (in feet) ,inch-�A. NOTE: 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. 2. GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEDS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING prof. no. SPEAR MEADOWS s�008 A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON .Si n drown MASTER PLAN AEIRchecked SOUTHDJG do.let. 11-01-16 LAMOUREUgi&r,,In, SON scale AS NOTED Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Dme n E— J—tioe, VT 05452 1n1: 802-87&4450 [ht, I fir, I I W l� I l co SEE SHEET 3 VT i I \ I 3118 — �, PROPOSED UTILITY EASBNW - UNNERSITYLTURR OSHTAIE ~� _ aTa ~�^�. AGRNILILNMLCOLLEGE -SEE SHEET 2 SEFIVICE TRANSMISSION MAIN PLAN OF CROSS COUNTRY WATERMAIN i / \ / t\ GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 6o 12o ,imI�11 --soft r a— 1 " 328 _ OPEN SPACE I 1 I PINNACLE Aj SPEAR I r IT , I .. —. TO BE REMOVm i - E%ISTN081DEWALK \ r .. ..._ ,\ \ �\ RUNT DRIVEWE BETWEEN NM r ANDRUCT PRISTINE E E. / GRAPHIC SCALE 30 o 15 30 60 120 (in feeQ 1 inch=3ofl. VALE DRIVE 1 r`— x r _ I I I I _ PFZOPOSED RESIbENTIAL DRIVE l..I / / I / sez LOT 49 I STORMWAYER POND 1 1 i i i ii i u NOTE 1. THIS PLAN IS FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW ONLY. 2. GAPS IN FINISH GRADE CONTOURS ARE DUE TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS (NOT SHOWN). THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD If OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY O FINAL O RECORD DRAWING prat. n SPEAR MEADOWS 4°D6 7A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design MASTER PLAN X—COUNTRY UTILITIES & VALE DRIVE EXTENSION ABR DJG date 11-01-16 LAMOUR EUX &"I.' SON Cnnxalti D EnRlneerv, Enc. 14 Moisc Unve Esser lenction. VT 05452 Tal'. RlYL87R-a450 scale AS NOTED ht. n 4 LEGEND PROJECT PROPERTY LINE nil STING PROPERTY LINE END PROPOSED TO BE DISSOLVED SIDELINE OF EASEMENT BARBET WIRE FENCE STONE WALL IP IRON PIPE FOUND IRMAISHAM ESTATE 21.W 8 IRF IRON ROD FOUND LOCATION MAP THONASOLOUIBE N� N.T.S KLEH LIFE ESTATE tb'IPF"OL "Go�'Srg6'1V CmOFSOUTH BURLINGTON TSF TSTAKE FOUND MICHAEL S MART' VOL 12K Po.M 13 AO _ -337.W Y - - �Pe 104 ■ CONCFETE MONUMENT TO BE SET P. BREFT GRABOWSKI BCOLUNS �ii_E INS SO.SP __..,,Hopp PATH EASEMENT -� - / DSY OFg�M IPS IRON PIPE SET 6JENNIFERMEOT MF 1'IPF Yp�"--� ^1Np,�,•,�,uNp��� VOL. 819DPD 28! VO1. 115, PG.629 0Z AO B VpL -"^'1 t� SURVEY POINT (NO MARKER) 1'IRF NOi01'S-Y_'�DHH-O / I� NIF NOWOR FORMERLY YWF HpT.14'M•W m6N rD- P- AROVF GRADE 2b'AI3 - - PROPOSED LOT-- LOT64 / / _ - SIDEIIM (EASEMENT / JOHN LARKIN BIG BELOWGRADE WF _ LOT53 / va.wlD,Pan NOTES: — \\ _ 1. THIS PROW SC�PINCLUDING THE USE FIE THE FOLUOMIND RECORD LOT 51 �_ RESEARCH INCLUDINGEDFRS OFTHEFOLLOWING PLANS ' I ���� `� A-LANDSOFROSERTANDMARJORIE SKIFF, SWIFTSTREET, SOUTH PROPOSED UTILITY I — �� BURL I NGTON, VERMONT, 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PIAT'DgTED4- . �M� - VALE DRIVE LAST REVIS, INC AS R BY LAMOUREU%d P2 OF T0N CITY CF TING SOU ¢ 60 (PROPOSED) ENGINEERS, INC ASRECORDEO IN SLIUE3920F THE CI OFSWTH B.'ESTATES. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. BYLIS ENGINEERING.AS 80, PAGE 184CR THE 1-1 BURLINGTON IND RECORDS. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOISG LNMAUATE PROPOSED / INC.,RSTTAFRANTDSCFRANZONI, 1340SPEARSTREET,SOUTH AGRICULTURK (n / BURUNGTON, VERMONT, DATED JANUARY 25, 2011. BY CIVIL BTORMWAIER I/ COlLEOE 'Q IRON ROD FOINW PINNACLE ARAD ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.. LAND EOEDIN SLIDE 550 OF NA EASEMENT 3.98 ST699i:4 OF� _ TSF =PAY SPACE THE CITY OF SOUTH euRUNCTW LANDRECORDS Vd..194, PG. 58A T IRON PIPETTJSESET \ GTAG .M.�1■O.WAG 1 HIE N FS N09•i99'Vl I D. S EA O STREET, SOUTH R OF FART N &COVERNIL NI-, D, 1340 8 1350 I I SPEAR STREET,SWTM BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED I" —40 �1 NOVEMBER29,2005, BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOOATES, INC, AS RECORDED IN SLIDE 550 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND b/ RECORDS. NC3 �I LOTS qqqqq E'FINALPLATFOR SUBDIVISION OFPROPERTY OFGERALDMlLOT 6'80 ACS AND JOHN LARKIN, PINNACLE ■ SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWLAND TWO) O WILLIAMBMAVREEN I RESPEAR STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT�A 'TEO III-S.GK BEJIT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE I AST REVISED 1-5-SS, BY VAUGHN C. BUTTON LS., AS RECORDED IN 'A NF SLIDE 335,2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. ( QI �.■ VOL IOD. Po.2m 2. THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE GENERATED FROM M49; A /i SURVEY GRADE GPS OBSERVATIONS RECORDED IN APRIL, 2016, S ARE BASED qJ THE VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATE I�� gTREET A I I SYSTEM, NADEDONT THE I PROPOSED I AO' (PRp_� l E 3. THE FIELOW'ORK FOR III SURVEY W COMPLETED IN APRIL, 2016. STORM"',= \ EASEMENT I 1 — 5. THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO CTIER EASEMENTS AND/OR d� 1•PF RIGHTS-CF-WAY. � fi. MONUMENTATON FOUND IS AS NOTED ON THIS PLAN ` 1'I SHED LOT 60 SARI 86S•01S2W I I. THE WIDTH D FOUR DESCRIPTION O$ FOUND SNOWN GE SPEAR STREET IS 0.1E 1.6'IPF / �D � 1�yy BASEDON gDESCRIPTION FOUND ON PAGE 111 THE TONN OF NATNIEEN BAWIESLE1.1'AG _ '-_ 1A•SS•T2•M I BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS ANO ROADS, 1B02-1865. �VOL. 012, Po. t■ YOL 113r Po.B9 I / - ( 6. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW PURPOSES _ - l 31pW.1jw ONLY. 1 J IPB /\1 Y I_ �c 1 IGhTiEiH LER. DWL 1z,2<�,-PO. w Cl—.( CLERICS OFFICE : 1-1 I I — I .4 cTV0Feoum3uRLMGTGN.v 3 OWL. 1A.03/ / r Q RECENED FORREGORO. .m1A / / / 1\ I � I AT �TGO� W. AND / \ I I I I RECOINEDM MIOE• S\iF +ap \ PROPoD U 3ERLm / / ' i / / I —'J DMENCMTA EASEMENT / / / i i I 8 NIF ATTEST: CRY CLEM U voL 1ST. Po.Sze REVISIONS CARLOSSSRID(TEF REVISI MARRODUM • \ TSF /,/ / / R LANDS OF OJE 0.6'AO„ I ) PU�CT a_ 6 FY ROBERTSTAMMY AV W Nff I LANONE VOL 1D45, M.221 ME C NIP M I � I dRAPHIC SdALE IOU IOU 200 1a0 (W race ) 1 Inah - 100 N. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT \ REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTBN, VERMONT, ON THE_ DAY OF , 2016 OWNER: SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS SPEAR EAMEA flDON6, INC. OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF SOUTH BUIR STGTO _ 2016 BV SOUTH 7. POINOION, W. VOL.TIT, PBS. 65185E TOTAL PARCEL NIA. m.e1 ACRES (CLERK OR CHAIRMAN) TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THIS JT FLAT 0 BASED ON INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROMPERTINENTDEEDSANDIDROTHER 1T111TI OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND I N ERS EVIDEHT �ONTHE PROPERTY. AND CONFORMS WNH THE .UCLA$ REGUIREMENB OF2TVSA I=L _L ID DATEDTHIS_DAYOF_,m18 -NSON. 656LS.C656 `AC:` iA//L 1'11,\1`N Spear Meadows 1302, 1340 & 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT Traffic Impact Assessment June 14, 2016 Introduction Spear Meadows (the Project) is a residential planned unit development proposed on the east side of Spear St south of Swift St in South Burlington. Its primary access will be onto Spear Street at a point 1,170± ft south of Swift St; with a secondary access via Vale Dr to Nowland Farm Rd. Linking these two access points will be Spear Meadow Rd; a new public street. The Project includes 18 new single family units, 20 new duplex units and 9 multi -family units, for a total of 47 new units. Additionally, the driveway of an existing single family home (#1350) will be relocated to Spear Meadow Rd from its present location onto Spear St. This traffic impact assessment (TIA) examines existing and future traffic congestion and safety conditions on the adjacent highway network in the vicinity of this Project, and analyzes the probable impacts that this Project will have on those conditions. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic volumes on Spear St in the immediate vicinity of this Project were obtained from a turning movement count performed at the Spear St/Swift St intersection on August 1 & 2, 2013. The observed pm peak hour volumes from that count were adjusted to a design hour volume (the 301h highest hour of traffic volumes in a year) using data from VTrans Automatic Traffic Recorder D129, located on Swift St just west of Spear St. That data yielded a DHV adjustment ratio of 1.026 to increase the afternoon peak hour volumes of the turning movement count to a DHV condition. Background daily traffic volumes in Vermont's urban areas declined between 2008 - 2014, but have since begun to rebound a bit. VTrans' most recent estimates of traffic growth on Vermont's highway predict a 12% growth rate in traffic volumes over the 20-year period from 2015-2035, or 0.6% per year. Figure 1 presents the estimated 2017 and 2022 background (no -build) design hour turning movement volumes in the vicinity of this Project. With morning peak hour volumes being less than afternoon peak hour volumes on Spear St, this TIA examines traffic congestion conditions during the latter time period only. As will be shown below, the afternoon time period also coincides with the time period of the highest left -turn volume entering the Project at Spear Meadow Rd as residents return home from work and other trip origins. Lamoureux Et Dickinson Page 1 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Figure 1- No -Build PM Peak Hour (DHV) 2017 2022 Spear St Spear St Swift 62 71 268 St 232 �I R T 71 R 34 Swift E 163 IL 115 St Swift 64 71 276 St 239 y R T 71 R 35 Swift E 168 IL 118 St 205 126 69 T 211 130 71 T 604 y 1 y N 622 y 1 y N R 1 Spear R 1 Spear T x IL 0 Meadow T A IL 0 Meadow 400 0 412 0 167 254 49 172 262 51 199 71 Allen 32 Rd R 23 Allen E 12 Rd 205 71 Allen 33 4 Rd R 24 Allen F 12 Rd 148 V K + 7P le 12 152 V __112K IL 12 9 8 0 F 3 266 82F S ear St S ear St Project -Generated Trips Anticipated peak hour trips for this Project were calculated using published trip generation rates' for single family dwellings (ITE Land Use Category #210). Table 1 summarizes the resulting peak hour trip generation estimates. Table 1- Weekday Trip Generation Average AM Peak Hour (vte/hr) PM Peak Hour (vte/hr) Weekday (vte/day) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total 447 9 26 35 33 19 52 The directional distributions of peak hour project -generated trips were estimated using the results of a turning movement count performed at the Spear St/Cedar Glen intersection (Stonehedge Condominiums) in July 2012. That distribution was modified to include an allowance for trips entering and exiting the Project via Vale Dr. This route, in combination with Nowland Farm Rd, is likely to be used by some Project -generated trips originating from, or destined to, the more southerly new units. With Nowland Farm Rd linking both Spear St and Dorset St, it is ' Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 9th Edition Lamoureux Et Dickinson Page 2 Consulting Engineers, Inc. l estimated that 20% of the Project -generated trips that otherwise would use Spear St will instead use Vale Dr and Nowland Farm Rd. Figure 2 shows the resulting distribution of project -generated pm peak hour trips. Figure 2 - PM Peak Hour Project Trips Spear St 10 y L� Swift IL 5 Swift St 9 N St K T 71 7 4 3 T N 24 y R 14 Spear IL 2 Meadow A 3 1 2 0 W y y Allen K 0 Allen Rd 3 71 Rd S ear St Combining the estimated modified distribution of pm peak hour project -generated trips with the no -build volumes provides the Build DHV turning movements shown in Figure 3. Traffic Congestion Levels of service (LOS) at intersections are determined by the average control delay; measured in seconds per vehicle. The methodology for analyzing LOS is established by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)Z. Table 2 summarizes the LOS/delay criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 2 - level of Service/Delay Criteria Avg. Delay (sec/veh) Avg. Delay (sec/veh) LOS Signalized Unsignalized LOS Signalized Unsignalized A s10 <_10 D s55 s35 B s20 s15 E <80 s50 C s35 s25 F >80 >50 2 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010 Lamoureux Et Dickinson Page 3 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Figure 3 - Build PM Peak Hour (DHV) 2017 2022 Ile Spear St y N at Spear St 40 V Swift 62 71 268 '� St 241 U R T 71 R 34 Swift F 163 Ile120 St Swift 64 71 276 4 St 248 V R T 71 R 35 Swift E 168 L, 123 St 212 130 72 T 218 134 74 T 604 40 24 y N 622 y 24 y N R 14 Spear R 14 Spear T 71 fC 2 Meadow T 71 Ile 2 Meadow 400 3 412 3 168 le 256 40 49 W 173 ile 264 y 51 y 202 71 Allen 32 Rd R 23 Allen E 12 Rd 208 71 Allen 33 Rd R 24 Allen E 12 Rd 148 U + 71 ie 12 152 U 123 IL 12 9 261 0 F 9 82 F 5 ear St 5 earSt In Vermont, LOS C represents the desired design standard for roadways and signalized intersection s3. At two-way stop controlled (unsignalized) intersections having greater than 100 vph approach volume on a single -lane side street approach or greater than 150 vph approach volume on a two-lane side street approach, the VTrans level of service policy establishes LOS D as the desired design standard on the minor street approach(s). There is no level of service standard for unsignalized intersections not meeting the above side street volume thresholds. Reduced levels of service are acceptable in densely settled areas where volume/capacity ratios remain below 1.0 and/or the improvements required to achieve LOS C would create adverse environmental and cultural impacts. Transportation demand management (TDM) strategies can also be used to help mitigate levels of service not meeting the foregoing standards. Although the Spear St/Spear Meadow intersection will not meet the above approach volume thresholds for unsignalized intersections, we performed intersection capacity analyses at it for the purpose of this TIA. All analyses were performed using Synchro v.8. The results are presented in Table 3. Detailed analysis worksheets are also attached in Appendix A. 3 Vermont Agency of Transportation Highway Design "Level of Service" Policy, May 31, 2007 Lamoureux Et Dickinson Page 4 Consulting Engineers, Inc. Table 3 - Intersection Capacity Analyses Results 2017 PM Peak Hour (DHV) 2022 PM Peak Hour (DHV) No -Build Build Approach & No -Build Build Lane Group LOS Delay V/C Max Q LOS! Delay V/C Max Q LOS ! Delay V/C !Max Q LOS Delay V/C Max Spear & Swift EB LT/TH D ! 44 0.78 366' D 44 0.78 366' D 45 0.80 383' D 45 0.79 383' EB RT A 7 0.41 78' A 7 0.42 86' A 7 0.42 84' A 8 0.43 92' WB LT C 23 0.441 i 92' C 24 0.47 95' C 24 0.47 94' C 25 0.49 ( 100' WB TH/RT B 17 0.291 138' B 17 0.29 138' B 17 0.29 143' B 17 0.29 143' NB LT B 17 0.47 1 120' B 17 0.49 124' B 17 0.49 , 123' B 17 0.51 128' NB TH/RT B 15 0.25 121' B 15 0.25 125' B 15 0.25 125' B 15 0.26 129' SB LT B 14 0.16 41' B j 14 0.16 41 B 15 0.16 42' B 15 0.16 42' SB TH/RT D 36 0.73 288' D 36 4 299 D 36 0.74 300' D 37 0.75 310' Overall C 25 C 25 C 25 ! C 26 Spear & Spear Mdw B 12 0.03 3' B 12 ! 0.03 3' WB LT/RT SB LT A 8 0.02 3' A 8 ! 0.02 3' Spear & Allen EB LT B 17 0.42 123' B 17 0.43 125' B 17 0.43 128' B 17 0.44 13 1' EB TH/RT A 6 10.28 57' A 6 0.28 57' A 6 0.29 59' A 6 0.29 59' WB LT/TH C 29 0.11 34' C 29 0.11 34' C 29 0.11 35' C 29 0.11 35' WB RT A 1 10.07 0' A 1 0.07 0' A 1 0.07 0' A 1 0.07 0' NB LT B 14 10.28 68' B 14 10.28, 68' B 14 0.30 i 70' B 14 0.30 70' NBTH/RT B 20- 0.52 225' B 20- 10.521 227' B 20- 10.531 232' C 20+ 0.53 234' SB LT B 13 0.15 34' B 13 0.15 34' B 13 0.16 34' B 13 0.16 34' SB TH C 23 :0.49 177' C 23 j 0.49 178' C 23 0.50 182' C 23 0.50 183' SB RT A 5 0.29 45' A 5 0.29 46' A 5 0.30 48' A 5 0.30 48' Overall B 15 B 15 B 15 B 15 The results shown in Table 3 indicate that this Project will minimally impact existing and future levels of service, delays and queue lengths at the two closest signalized intersections on Spear Street. Additionally, there will be excellent levels of service with minimal delays and little or no queuing at the new Spear St/Spear Meadow intersection. Traffic Safety We first examined the most recent five-year crash history of Spear St. The 0.3 mile long segment of Spear St between mile markers (mm) 1.80 and 2.10 has been identified as a high crash segment°. During the five-year period from 2010-2014, a total of 19 crashes were reported in this segment. This particular segment, however, includes the Spear St/Swift St intersection, which is located at mm 1.88 and accounted for 14 of the 19 crashes. The Spear St/Swift St intersection has not been identified as a high crash intersection, however. Removing those intersection crashes from the 0.3 long segment of Spear St between mm 1.80 and 2.10 would result in this segment no longer being classified as a high crash segment. ° Vermont Agency of Transportation 2010-2014 High Crash Location Report, November 2015 Lamoureux Ell: Dickinson Page 5 Consulting Engineers, Inc. The posted speed limit on Spear St south of Swift St is 35 mph. Its horizontal and vertical alignment in the vicinity of this Project is excellent without significant grades or curves. Excellent sight distances well in excess of 500 ft are also available along its entire length. Portions of the existing cedar hedge along the east side of Spear St will be removed both north and south of the new Spear Meadow Rd intersection in order to provide the recommended' 390 ft of intersection sight distance in both directions. Turn lanes are commonly provided at intersections to provide additional capacity. They also serve to separate turning vehicles from through traffic in order to improve safety conditions. The large majority of traffic entering this Project from the north by making a left -turn could warrant the installation of an exclusive left -turn lane on Spear St. Left -turn lane warrants were first developed by a researcher named "Harmelink" in 1967 for high speed rural highways. His methodology was subsequently adopted by AASHTO and numerous state transportation agencies, including VTrans. In 1991, researchers named "Kikuchi" and "Chakroborty" identified errors in Harmelink's original methodology, and developed a modified left -turn warrant using correct queuing theory. The modified Harmelink/AASHTO method is used herein to examine the warrants for an exclusive left -turn lane. The results of those analyses indicate that an exclusive left -turn lane on Spear St is not warranted by proposed 47 new residential units plus the one existing residential unit in Spear Meadow. A copy of the left -turn lane warrant calculations is included in Appendix B. New traffic control signs and pavement markings will be installed at each crosswalk and intersection within the Project. Their locations are shown on the Project's engineering design plans. New street lights will also be provided at the Spear Meadow Rd intersections with Spear St and Vale Dr. TDM Strategies & Multi -Modal Connections There are no sidewalks or shared -use paths along Spear St in the immediate vicinity of this Project. Due to the proximity of this Project to the existing shared use path at the intersection of Spear St and Swift St, this Project includes the installation of new pedestrian warning signs on Spear St. The closest local transit route is along Shelburne Road; too distant to be readily accessible to future residents of this Project. This Project's street layout includes new sidewalks and/or shared -use paths within the Project. In particular, the shared -use path along this Project's easterly boundary will at some future date be extended to connect with the existing shared -use path that runs along Swift St to the north (see below). It also connects with the existing sidewalks along Vale Dr and shared -use path along Nowland Farm Rd. Transportation Impact Fees As part of its local approval, this Project will pay $32,821 (based on 2017 construction year) to the City of South Burlington in road improvement impact fees. Those fees will be used to construct designated highway and intersection improvements throughout the City (as identified in the City Impact Fee Ordinance). Examination of ' A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011 Lamoureux It Dickinson Page 6 LID Consulting Engineers, Inc. the City Impact Fee Ordinance indicates that there are no planned major capital improvements on Spear St or other nearby city streets in the vicinity of this Project. This Project will also pay recreation impact fees to the City of South Burlington. An undefined portion of this fee is used to pay for the development of recreation paths (shared -use paths) and bicycle lanes, including a bicycle lane along Spear Street and the Vale Dr to Spear & Swift recreation path connection. With regard to the latter, this Project will construct approximately 1,900 ft of this 2,400 ft long connection. The remaining 500 ft crosses just one other parcel between this Project and Swift St. The total recreation impact fee to be paid to the City equals $77,672; subject to receiving a credit for the "in -kind" contribution of the foregoing Vale Dr to Spear & Swift recreation path construction as provided for by Section 8 of the Impact Fee Ordinance. Conclusions & Recommendations From the foregoing analyses, we have formed the following conclusions and recommendations regarding the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts of this Project: • Intersection capacity analyses at the Swift St, Spear Meadow and Allen Rd intersections on Spear St indicate that acceptable levels of service will be maintained with this Project. • This Project can be reasonably expected to have minimal, if any, impact on existing and future traffic safety conditions on the adjacent roadway network in the vicinity. • In addition to paying $32,821 in road improvement impact fees, this Project will construct almost 80% of the length of the planned Vale Dr to Spear & Swift shared -use path identified as a recreation improvement project in the City of South Burlington's Impact Fee Ordinance. Lamoureux 6t Dickinson Page 7 Consulting Engineers, Inc. APPENDIX A Intersection Capacity Analysis Results Lamoureux Et Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 No -Build 1: Spear St & Swift St * I Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *' r 1r 1� ' T Volume (vph) 62 268 232 115 163 34 205 126 69 59 257 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 75 125 0 100 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.947 0.961 Flt Protected 0.991 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1828 1567 1770 1814 0 1770 1764 0 1770 1790 0 Flt Permitted 0.901 0.216 0.256 0.635 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1662 1567 402 1814 0 477 1764 0 1183 1790 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 230 12 37 20 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 843 711 1032 463 Travel Time (s) 19.2 16.2 23.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 62 268 232 115 163 34 205 126 69 59 257 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 330 232 115 197 0 205 195 0 59 346 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 10.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 29.0 19.0 41.0 10.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 32.2% 21.1 % 45.6% 11.1 % 35.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.5 18.5 25.1 27.2 34.9 31.8 20.8 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.34 0.37 0.48 0.44 0.29 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.41 0.44 0.29 0.47 0.25 0.16 0.73 Control Delay 43.8 6.5 23.3 16.8 16.6 14.7 14.4 35.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.8 6.5 23.3 16.8 16.6 14.7 14.4 35.7 LOS D A C B B B B D Approach Delay 28.4 19.2 15.7 32.6 Approach LOS C B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 37.0 4.0 28.0 P:120141140081Traffic12017 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 No -Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 31.7 4.0 22.7 70th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 21.1 21.1 6.0 33.1 13.0 28.0 4.0 19.0 50th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 16.0 16.0 6.0 28.0 11.7 33.2 0.0 15.5 30th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 10.0 10.0 O.p 10.0 7.7 23.3 0.0 9.6 10th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Skip Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 149 1 36 57 60 54 16 151 Queue Length 95th (ft) #366 78 92 138 120 121 41 288 Internal Link Dist (ft) 763 631 952 383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 125 100 90 Base Capacity (vph) 567 686 259 815 477 985 371 755 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 0.34 0.44 0.24 0.43 0.20 0.16 0.46 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 72.9 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.7 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 84.7 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 79.1 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 69.2 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 41.3 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Spear St & Swift St g 6R0.'�vXY , �.�.`.. :_ -:, P:\2014\140081Traffic\2017 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 No -Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline --► --* r-- 4�_ I * Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ' T+ 4 r T t r Volume (vph) 199 32 148 12 12 23 119 258 80 49 254 167 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 0 100 80 0 90 90 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.877 0.850 0.964 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.976 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1601 0 0 1818 1583 1770 1796 0 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.421 0.857 0.431 0.475 Satd. Flow (perm) 769 1601 0 0 1596 1583 803 1796 0 885 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 148 158 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 929 719 520 837 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.3 11.8 19.0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 199 32 148 12 12 23 119 258 80 49 254 167 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 199 180 0 0 24 23 119 338 0 49 254 167 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 42.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 12.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split(%) 22.2% 46.7% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 13.3% 42.2% 11.1% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 Ali -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.1 18.1 7.1 7.1 19.8 19.2 15.8 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.13 0.37 0.36 0.30 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.28 0.11 0.07 0.28 0.52 0.15 0.49 0.29 Control Delay 16.8 5.5 29.0 0.3 13.6 19.8 13.0 23.0 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.8 5.5 29.0 0.3 13.6 19.8 13.0 23.0 4.6 LOS B A C A B B B C A Approach Delay 11.4 15.0 18.2 15.4 Approach LOS B B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 14.0 28.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 24.8 4.0 22.8 22.8 P:\2014\14008\Traffic\2017 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 No -Build I Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline - -i -* f.4- 4-- 4\ t1* 1 41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 70th %ile Green (s) 14.0 27.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.0 18.6 4.0 16.6 16.6 70th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 12.4 24.8 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.0 15.4 4.0 13.4 13.4 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 9.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 21.5 0.0 9.5 9.5 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Max Hold Skip Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 7.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 10.7 10.7 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Skip Dwell Skip Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 7 8 0 27 104 11 83 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 123 57 34 0 68 225 34 177 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 849 639 440 757 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 100 80 90 90 Base Capacity (vph) 603 1172 541 641 420 1222 335 1209 1091 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.15 0.21 0.15 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 53.5 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 73.3 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 65.7 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60.2 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 40.5 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 27.9 P:120141140081Traffic12017 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline --► ``r 4,- '+-- "'1_ Al t 10� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r T+ T+ T Volume (vph) 62 268 241 120 163 34 212 130 72 59 267 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 75 125 0 100 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.947 0.962 Flt Protected 0.991 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1828 1567 1770 1814 0 1770 1764 0 1770 1792 0 Flt Permitted 0.901 0.217 0.247 0.631 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1662 1567 404 1814 0 460 1764 0 1175 1792 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 230 12 38 19 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 843 711 1032 463 Travel Time (s) 19.2 16.2 23.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 62 268 241 120 163 34 212 130 72 59 267 89 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 330 241 120 197 0 212 202 0 59 356 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 10.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 29.0 19.0 41.0 10.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 32.2% 21.1 % 45.6% 11.1 % 35.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.9 18.9 25.6 27.8 35.7 32.6 21.4 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.38 0.48 0.44 0.29 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.42 0.47 0.29 0.49 0.25 0.16 0.74 Control Delay 43.4 7.1 24.2 17.0 16.9 14.6 14.4 36.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.4 7.1 24.2 17.0 16.9 14.6 14.4 36.0 LOS D A C B B B B D Approach Delay 28.1 19.7 15.8 33.0 Approach LOS C B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 37.0 4.0 28.0 P:120141140081Traffic12017 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 32.4 4.0 23.4 70th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 21.4 21.4 6.0 33.4 13.0 28.4 4.0 19.4 50th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 16.2 16.2 6.0 28.2 12.0 33.9 0.0 15.9 30th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 11.5 11.5 0.0 11.5 8.6 25.9 0.0 11.3 10th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Skip Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 150 4 38 58 63 57 16 158 Queue Length 95th (ft) #366 86 95 138 124 125 41 299 Internal Link Dist (ft) 763 631 952 383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 125 100 90 Base Capacity (vph) 547 670 257 794 466 953 374 730 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.60 0.36 0.47 0.25 0.45 0.21 0.16 0.49 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 74.1 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 85.4 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 79.8 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 70.1 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45.4 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:\2014\14008\Traffic\2017 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2017 Build 2: Spear St & Spear Meadow Baseline Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 2 14 400 3 24 604 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 14 400 3 24 604 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1054 402 0 0 403 0 Stage 1 402 - - - - - Stage 2 652 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 250 648 1156 Stage 1 676 - - Stage 2 518 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 242 648 - 1156 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 242 - - Stage 1 676 - Stage 2 502 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.9 0 0.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (vehlh) - 536 1156 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.03 0.021 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 11.9 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS - B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 0.1 - P:120141140081Traffic12017 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'fir 4 r 1� t r Volume (vph) 202 32 148 12 12 23 119 261 80 49 256 168 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 0 100 80 0 90 90 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.877 0.850 0.965 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.976 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (prot) 1734 1601 0 0 1818 1583 1770 1798 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.421 0.857 0.428 0.470 Satd. Flow (perm) 769 1601 0 0 1596 1583 797 1798 0 875 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 148 158 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 929 719 520 837 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.3 11.8 19.0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 202 32 148 12 12 23 119 261 80 49 256 168 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 180 0 0 24 23 119 341 0 49 256 168 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 42.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 12.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 22.2% 46.7% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 13.3% 42.2% 11.1 % 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.2 18.2 7.2 7.2 19.8 19.2 15.8 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.13 0.37 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.28 0.11 0.07 0.28 0.52 0.15 0.49 0.29 Control Delay 16.9 5.5 29.1 0.3 13.6 19.9 13.0 23.0 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 16.9 5.5 29.1 0.3 13.6 19.9 13.0 23.0 4.6 LOS B A C A B B B C A Approach Delay 11.5 15.0 18.2 15.5 Approach LOS B B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 14.0 28.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 24.9 4.0 22.9 22.9 P:120141140081Traffic12017 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2017 Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline -1, -• -,.* 'r A--- 4--- -'\ T \*. 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 70th %ile Green (s) 14.0 27.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.0 18.7 4.0 16.7 16.7 70th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 12.5 24.9 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.0 15.5 4.0 13.5 13.5 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 9.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 21.5 0.0 9.5 9.5 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Max Hold Skip Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 7.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 10.6 10.6 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Skip Dwell Skip Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 7 8 0 27 106 11 84 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 125 57 34 0 68 227 34 178 46 Internal Link Dist (ft) 849 639 440 757 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 100 80 90 90 Base Capacity (vph) 602 1171 540 640 418 1221 333 1207 1090 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.28 0.15 0.21 0.15 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 53.6 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 73.4 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 65.8 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60.4 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 40.6 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 27.9 P:120141140081Traffic12017 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 No -Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline -.4 ---► --* *-- 4`- 4\ I /P� '1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *' r T+ '� T T Volume (vph) 64 276 239 118 168 35 211 130 71 61 265 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 75 125 0 100 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.947 0.961 Fit Protected 0.991 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1828 1567 1770 1814 0 1770 1764 0 1770 1790 0 Fit Permitted 0.899 0.208 0.247 0.632 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1658 1567 387 1814 0 460 1764 0 1177 1790 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 230 12 37 20 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 843 711 1032 463 Travel Time (s) 19.2 16.2 23.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 64 276 239 118 168 35 211 130 71 61 265 92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 340 239 118 203 0 211 201 0 61 357 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 10.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 29.0 19.0 41.0 10.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 32.2% 21.1 % 45.6% 11.1 % 35.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.2 19.2 25.9 28.0 35.8 32.7 21.6 19.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.38 0.48 0.44 0.29 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.42 0.47 0.29 0.49 0.25 0.16 0.74 Control Delay 45.1 7.0 24.3 17.1 16.9 14.7 14.5 36.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 45.1 7.0 24.3 17.1 16.9 14.7 14.5 36.1 LOS D A C B B B B D Approach Delay 29.3 19.8 15.9 33.0 Approach LOS C B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 37.0 4.0 28.0 P:120141140081Traffic12022 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 No -Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 32.6 4.0 23.6 70th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 21.9 21.9 6.0 33.9 13.0 28.5 4.0 19.5 5Qth %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap Nth %ile Green (s) 0.0 16.6 16.6 6.0 28.6 12.1 34.2 0.0 16.1 30th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 11.8 11.8 0.0 11.8 8.5 25.8 0.0 11.3 10th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Skip Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 156 3 37 60 63 58 17 160 Queue Length 95th (ft) #383 84 94 143 123 125 42 300 Internal Link Dist (ft) 763 631 952 383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 125 100 90 Base Capacity (vph) 543 668 253 794 464 947 374 726 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.36 0.47 0.26 0.45 0.21 0.16 0.49 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 74.5 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 85.6 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 80.4 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 70.8 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45.6 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:120141140081Traffic12022 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 No -Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd II Baseline 4\ t /0� i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� +1 r '� T t r Volume (vph) 205 33 152 12 12 24 123 266 82 51 262 172 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 0 100 80 0 90 90 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.877 0.850 0.965 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.976 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1601 0 0 1818 1583 1770 1798 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.421 0.857 0.420 0.459 Satd. Flow (perm) 769 1601 0 0 1596 1583 782 1798 0 855 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 152 158 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 929 719 520 837 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.3 11.8 19.0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 205 33 152 12 12 24 123 266 82 51 262 172 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 205 185 0 0 24 24 123 348 0 51 262 172 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 42.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 12.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 22.2% 46.7% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 13.3% 42.2% 11.1 % 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 7.2 7.2 19.9 19.3 15.9 15.2 15.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.13 0.37 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.29 0.11 0.07 0.30 0.53 0.16 0.50 0.30 Control Delay 17.1 5.5 29.3 0.4 13.7 20.0 13.0 23.1 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.1 5.5 29.3 0.4 13.7 20.0 13.0 23.1 4.8 LOS B A C A B B B C A Approach Delay 11.6 14.9 18.4 15.6 Approach LOS B B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 14.0 28.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 25.4 4.0 23.4 23.4 P:120141140081Traffic12022 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 No -Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline -' '- t /P- 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 70th %ile Green (s) 14.0 27.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.0 19.1 4.0 17.1 17.1 70th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 12.7 25.1 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.0 15.8 4.0 13.8 13.8 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 9.2 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 21.6 0.0 9.6 9.6 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Max Hold Skip Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 7.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 10.2 10.2 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Skip Dwell Skip Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 7 8 0 29 110 11 87 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 128 59 35 0 70 232 34 182 48 Internal Link Dist (ft) 849 639 440 757 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 100 80 90 90 Base Capacity (vph) 602 1167 540 641 414 1216 329 1202 1086 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.34 0.16 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.29 0.16 0.22 0.16 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 53.9 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 73.9 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 66.2 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 60.9 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 40.8 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 27.5 P:\2014\14008\Traffic\2022 No-Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +1 r T T 1� Volume (vph) 64 276 248 123 168 35 218 134 74 61 275 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 75 125 0 100 0 90 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.974 0.947 0.962 Flt Protected 0.991 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1828 1567 1770 1814 0 1770 1764 0 1770 1792 0 Flt Permitted 0.899 0.209 0.236 0.628 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1658 1567 389 1814 0 440 1764 0 1170 1792 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 230 12 38 19 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 843 711 1032 463 Travel Time (s) 19.2 16.2 23.5 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 64 276 248 123 168 35 218 134 74 61 275 92 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 340 248 123 203 0 218 208 0 61 367 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 10.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 29.0 19.0 41.0 10.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 11.1 % 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 32.2% 21.1 % 45.6% 11.1 % 35.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.5 19.5 26.2 28.3 36.4 33.2 22.0 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.38 0.48 0.44 0.29 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.43 0.49 0.29 0.51 0.26 0.16 0.75 Control Delay 44.8 7.6 25.2 17.3 17.4 14.8 14.5 37.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.8 7.6 25.2 17.3 17.4 14.8 14.5 37.1 LOS D A C B B B B D Approach Delay 29.1 20.3 16.2 33.8 Approach LOS C C B C 90th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 37.0 4.0 28.0 P:120141140081Traffic12022 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 Build 1: Spear St & Swift St Baseline --* --§, f- .6\ I /0* 1 i Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max n Hold Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 0.0 23.0 23.0 6.0 35.0 13.0 33.3 4.0 24.3 70th %ile Term Code Skip Max Max Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 0.0 22.2 22.2 6.0 34.2 13.0 28.9 4.0 19.9 50th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Max Hold Max Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 0.0 17.8 17.8 6.0 29.8 12.5 35.2 0.0 16.7 30th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Max Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 11.9 11.9 0.0 11.9 8.7 26.4 0.0 11.7 10th %ile Term Code Skip Gap Gap Skip Hold Gap Hold Skip Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 157 7 39 61 66 60 17 167 Queue Length 95th (ft) #383 92 #100 143 128 129 42 310 Internal Link Dist (ft) 763 631 952 383 Turn Bay Length (ft) 75 125 100 90 Base Capacity (vph) 536 662 251 791 455 936 375 717 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.37 0.49 0.26 0.48 0.22 0.16 0.51 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 75.3 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 86.3 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 81.1 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 73 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 46.3 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P:\2014\14008\Traffic\2022 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2022 Build 2: Spear St & Spear Meadow Baseline Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 2 14 412 3 24 622 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None None Storage Length 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 14 412 3 24 622 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1084 414 0 0 415 0 Stage 1 414 - - - - - Stage 2 670 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 240 638 - 1144 Stage 1 667 - - - Stage 2 509 - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 232 638 1144 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 232 - - Stage 1 667 - Stage 2 493 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 0 0.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) 523 1144 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.021 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 12.1 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - P:\2014\14008\Traffic\2022 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline -A _0 --V f '* 4-- 4\ t /&� \40- 1 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ +T r Vi T + r Volume (vph) 208 33 152 12 12 24 123 269 82 51 264 173 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 110 0 0 100 80 0 90 90 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.877 0.850 0.965 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.976 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1601 0 0 1818 1583 1770 1798 0 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.421 0.857 0.418 0.455 Satd. Flow (perm) 769 1601 0 0 1596 1583 779 1798 0 848 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 152 158 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 929 719 520 837 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.3 11.8 19.0 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 208 33 152 12 12 24 123 269 82 51 264 173 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 208 185 0 0 24 24 123 351 0 51 264 173 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 10.0 20.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 42.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 12.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split(%) 22.2% 46.7% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 13.3% 42.2% 11.1% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Min None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.3 18.3 7.2 7.2 20.0 19.4 16.0 15.2 15.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.13 0.37 0.36 0.30 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.29 0.11 0.07 0.30 0.53 0.16 0.50 0.30 Control Delay 17.3 5.6 29.4 0.4 13.7 20.0 13.0 23.1 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.3 5.6 29.4 0.4 13.7 20.0 13.0 23.1 4.8 LOS B A C A B C B C A Approach Delay 11.8 14.9 18.4 15.6 Approach LOS B B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 14.0 28.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6.0 25.6 4.0 23.6 23.6 P:120141140081Traffic12022 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2022 Build 3: Spear St & Allen Rd Baseline --* --I. --* it 4--- 4\ t /r` '-*. 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 90th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 70th %iie Green (s) 14.0 27.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.0 19.3 4.0 17.3 17.3 70th %ile Term Code Max Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 12.8 25.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.0 15.9 4.0 13.9 13.9 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Gap Gap Gap Max Gap Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 9.3 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 21.7 0.0 9.7 9.7 30th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Max Hold Skip Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 7.3 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 10.1 10.1 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Skip Skip Skip Skip Dwell Skip Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 49 7 8 0 29 111 11 88 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 131 59 35 0 70 234 34 183 48 Internal Link Dist (ft) 849 639 440 757 Turn Bay Length (ft) 110 100 80 90 90 Base Capacity(vph) 602 1164 540 640 414 1213 328 1199 1083 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.16 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.29 0.16 0.22 0.16 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 54 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 74.1 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 66.4 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 61.1 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 41 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 27.4 P:120141140081Traffic12022 Build.syn 6/13/2016 R. Dickinson Page 2 Left -Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Results Lamoureux £t Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. LAMOUI� )X & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINI( :S, INC. LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS PROJECT #: 14008 BY: R. Dickinson PROJECT: Spear Meadow DATE: 14-Jun-16 LOCATION: Spear St, South Burlington Source: Kikuchi and Chakroborty's "Modified Harmelink/AASHTO Model" from Method For Prioritizing Intersection Improvements, Washington State Transportation Center Research Report, January 1997 YEAR: 2022 TIME: PM Peak Hour SPEED: 35 mph Exclusive right -turn lane in the Va direction (Y/N)? Exclusive left -turn lane in the Vo direction (Y/N)? N N ENTER TRAFFIC VOLUMES (vph): Vadv. Vopp. Left -Turn = 24 0 Thru = 622 412 Right -Turn = 0 3 Va = 646 vph Vo = 415 vph L = 3.7% PLTF = 1 (L <= 5%; 1; otherwise 0) PLTT = 0 (L > 5% & <= 10%; 1; otherwise 0) PLTW = 0 (L > 10% & <= 20%; 1; otherwise 0) Va = exp(6.9017-0.001141 *Vo+0.81007`PLTF+0.45384*PLTT+0.13858"PLTW-0.01816"SPEED) Warranting Va = 734 vph Va = 646 < 734 THEREFORE, LEFT -TURN LANE NOT WARRANTED REQUIRED LENGTH = 0 FEET P:\2014\14008\Traffic\LT-TURN MOD.gpw 00023311 1 V= 1131 PG= 235 EXTENSION AND AMENDMENT OF OPTION AGREEMENT NOW COME VERMONT LAND TRUST, INC., a Vermont non-profit corporation having its principal place of business in Montpelier, Vermont ("VLT") and SPEAR MEADOWS, INC., a Vermont corporation having its principal place of business in Colchester, Vermont ("Optionee") who hereby agree as follows: WHEREAS, Optionee entered into an Option Agreement with Leduc Farm, Inc. on February 12, 2009 ("the Option"), a Notice of which is recorded in Volume 837 at page 225 of the South Burlington Land Records, whereby Optionee acquired the right to purchase 25 transferable development rights ("TDRS") for the purpose of increasing the density of its proposed development on "Optionee's Property" as defined in the Option; WHEREAS, on August 6, 2009, Optionee exercised its right under the Option to acquire 31 additional TDRS; WHEREAS, VLT acquired the TDRS from Leduc Farm, Inc. and took an assignment of the Option by Warranty Deed, dated September 30, 2009 and recorded in Volume 896 at page 228 of the South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, the right to acquire TDRS by the so-called Edgewood Project referenced in the Option has terminated; WHEREAS, the Optionee is not seeking to use the purchase of the TDRS under the Option for the purpose of providing prime agricultural soil mitigation for purposes of Optionee's Act 250 permit; WHEREAS, the Optionee continues to pursue the permits and approvals for the development of Optionee's Property, as described in the Option; WHEREAS, the term of the Option expires on February 12, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Optionee desires to extend the term of the Option for an additional two (2) years and VLT is willing to so extend the term of the Option. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and in reliance upon the representations contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows (all capitalized terms not hereinafter defined having the same meaning herein as in the Option): 1. Section 1 of the Option is hereby amended to delete all reference to the Edgewood Project. 2. The Option is amended generally to delete all terms and provisions associated with the Optionee's acquisition of the Optioned Property for prime agricultural soil mitigation for purposes of Optionee's Act 250 permit. Therefore, the purchase price for the TDRs shall be as set forth in the last sentence of Section 8 of the Option. 3. Section 3 of the Option is hereby amended to state fhat the Term of the Option shall terminate at 12:01 a.m. on the 14`h of February, 2015 ("the Expiration Date"), unless extended by written agreement of the parties. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received Jan 10►2013 10:30A Recorded in VOL: 1131 PG: 235 _aofp OF So. Burlington Land Records Attest= Donna Kinville City Clerk 00023311 V : 1131 PG : 236 4. Section 2 of the Option is hereby amended to state that the Optionee shall make two (2) Additional Option Payments in the amount stated in the Option, which payments shall be due on the fourth (0) and fifth (5`h) anniversary dates of the Effective Date. 5. This Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement may be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 6. All other terms and provisions of the Option not previously modified remain in full force and effect. Dated at Richmond, Vermont this 21 st day of December, 2012. VERMONT LAND /TRUST, INC. By: _0d`� / Its Duly Authorized Ag STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. On this 21' day of December, 2012 personally appeared Richard F. Peterson, Jr., duly authorized agent of Vermont Land Trust, Inc., to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he acknowledged this instrument by him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Land Trust, Inc. Before me, J Notary Pu i My Commission Expires: 4all5 Dated at � y:'!�''J , Vermont this r day of 5 , 201.; SPEAR MV'Kp7OWS, IN By:�/l its Iy uti ri.>eu Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. On this V day of Iflow , 2013 personally appeared JILS, _F duly authorized agent of Spear M6dows, Inc., to me known to be the 0&son who executed the foregoing instrument, and jjf, acknowledged this instrument by t;msigned, to belofree act and deed and the free act and deed of Spear Meadows, Inc. Before me, N 4rr,c My Commission Expires: 2/10/15 END OF DOCUMENT nc+_�tvru ('gU AUt.GIJLj Uy;,)ua p Re.orded in VOL: 1254 PG: 97 ~ b 00033810 i V n 1254 PG = 97 OF So. Burlington Land Records Attest: Donna Kinvi Ile City Clerk Second Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement NOW COME Vermont Land Trust, Inc., a Vermont non-profit corporation having its principal place of business in Montpelier, Vermont ("VLT") and Spear Meadows, Inc., a Vermont corporation having its principal place of business in Colchester, Vermont ("Optionee") who hereby agree as follows: WHEREAS, Optionee entered into an Option Agreement with Leduc Farm, Inc. on February 12, 2009 (the "Option"), a Notice of which is recorded in Volume 837, Page 225 of the South Burlington Land Records, whereby Optionee acquired the right to purchase 25 transferrable development rights ("TDRs") for the purpose of increasing the density of its proposed development on "Optionee's Property" as defined in the Option; WHEREAS, on August 6, 2009, Optionee exercised its right under the Option to acquire 31 additional TDRs; WHEREAS, VLT acquired the TDRs from Leduc Farm, Inc. and took an assignment of the Option by Warranty Deed, dated September 30, 2009 and recorded in Volume 896, Page 228 of the South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, VLT and Optionee entered into an Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement, dated December 21, 2012 and January 3, 2013 and recorded in Volume 1131 at page 235 of the South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, the Optionee continues to pursue the permits and approvals for the development of Optionee's Property, as described in the Option; WHEREAS, the term of the Option expires on February 14, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Optionee desires to extend the term of the Option for an additional three (3) years and VLT is willing to so extend the term of the Option. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and in reliance upon the representations contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows (all capitalized terms not hereunder defined having the same meaning herein as in the Option): Section 3 of the Option is amended to state that the Term of the Option shall terminate at 12:01 a.m. on the 14`h of February, 2018 (the "Expiration Date"), unless extended by written agreement of the parties. 2. Section 2 of the Option is hereby amended to state that the Optionee shall make three (3) Additional Option Payments in the amount stated in the Option, which payments shall be due on the sixth (6`s), seventh (7th) and eighth (8`h) anniversary dates of the Effective Date. 00033810 V e 1254 PG' 99 3. This Extension and Amendment of Option Agreement may be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 4. All other terms and provisions of the Option as amended and not previously modified remain in full force and effect. Ho �- Dated at 1V a- a -es V ent this I Itkday of 10 YIA a tQ 2015. Spear By: _ Duly Vermont Land Trust, Inc. By: 2 Duly Authorized Ager() State of Vermont C k' r} q , County On this / 7 `"day of 1=sue 6 , 2015 personally appeared R� -, kw if n� f�.,.7, duly authorized agent of Vermont Land Trust, Inc., to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Land Trust, Inc. Before me: Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2110120W )9 Honda, State of Vennent Ca I I i -e County On this ! I" -day of Rjn� i t- , 2015 personally appeared FOLrre /l duly authorized agent of Spear Meadows, Inc., to me known to be the person wh executed the foregoing instrument, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of Spear Meadows, Before me - Notary Publi &a of ca E 13eauG My Commission Expire s• ��++++++}�ots,qBEAU���� • 2 . * % of 0 January 19, 2017 Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Master Plan Approval #MP-16-02, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street Dear Mr. Rowe: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on May 23, 2014. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 4�njl( aI d J. Bel it Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7015 0640 0007 8199 3754 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburI.com Lindsey Britt From: Andy Rowe <andy@ldengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 6:22 PM To: Lindsey Britt r-c: 'Chric 4Zn\/rJnr' —y.,.., Subject: RE: Spear Meadows waivers HI Lindsey — The Master Plan application cover letter from Spear Meadow included a request for waivers based upon the submission requirements listed in Appendix E. As discussed today, we understand that waivers may be requested from the DRB as part of the Master Plan review, or as part of the Preliminary PUD Plat review. Since the DRB has already reviewed and discussed the proposed waivers as part of the Preliminary PUD Plat review, we understand that requesting review of the waivers under the Master Plan review would be redundant and unnecessary. Therefore, we withdraw the request for consideration of the waivers under the Master Plan review. We also understand that since the Preliminary PUD Plat hearing has been re -opened, that the DRB could discuss the waivers again if they determined it was warranted. Thank you for your continued assistance with this application Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 878-4450 From: Lindsey Britt [mailto:lbritt@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:24 PM To: Andy Rowe Subject: Spear Meadows waivers Hi Andy, Could you submit a brief email indicating that the applicant has decided not to pursue any waivers as part of the Master Plan application? Thank you, Lindsey Britt, MRP Development Review Planner 802-846-4138 Ibritt@sburl.com Department of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 www.sburl.com 1 BURAK ANDERSON ME LL ONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL on November 30th and VIA HAND DELIVERY on December 6th Mr. Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 - Fax: 802 862-8176 www.vtlawl.com November 30, 2016 Re: The Snyder Group, Inc. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 (re -opened) and Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 Dear Chairperson Miller: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced Applications for Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons (collectively, the "Neighbors Group" or the "Group"). I am unable to attend the December 6, 2016 DRB meeting, so I would be grateful if you would include this letter with the materials for the above -referenced Applications. The Neighbors Group continues to oppose Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 for the reasons stated in my October 3, 2016 letter to you, the text of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The Neighbors Group opposes Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 as untimely filed in violation of Section 15.07(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Section 15.07(C)(1) requires that a master plan application be filed within six months after the final DRB meeting on the sketch plan, which in this case was January 19, 2016. For a detailed discussion of why the Group maintains that Master Plan Application #MP-16-02 is untimely, please see my November 1, 2016 letter to you, the text of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Letter to DRB Chair Bill Miller November 30, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Bum ANDERSON & MELLONIYLC Finally, as of November 30th, the Planning and Zoning Department Staff has not released its written comments on Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-18 (re -opened) or Master Plan Application #MP-16-02. The Neighbors Group respectfully reserves the right to supplement its opposition to one or both Applications following the release of the Staff comments and/or following the December 6, 2016 DRB meeting. On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB for its consideration and courtesies, and happy holidays. Respectfully submitted, lsl Daniel A. Seff Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) rti C I a S. s -"I fi e d UTO: 2004 Teal Mazda 6, good ondition, just inspected, 99,000 ales, heated automated leather cats, sun roof, new windshield, Tinter tires included, only one revious owner, $2,500. 802-310- 889. (11/17) UTO: 2006 Nissan Altima, -door, high mileage, air condi- oner, heater, good tires, every- ung works great, runs excellent, 900 OBO.802-373-5879. (11 / 17) STATE ITEMS: Mahogany drop- !af table, seats 8, leaves, four chairs, $175. 1940's rattan couch and chair, including new cush- ions, $85. China cabinet with built-in desk, $150. Coffee table, round, wood/metal/glass, $65. 802-862-7000.(11/10) ITEMS: Tradesman wood work- bench, 5'long with shelf below, $80. Living Well pressure cooker, slowcooker, never used, $90.802- 999-4328. (11/10) MENORAH: Silver-plated, on pedestal, with candles, 11 1/2"wx 16" tall, polishes -up to a beautiful luster, $15.802-448-3786. (11 / 10) Outfoxing the Scammers CONTINUED FROM PAGE 8 gal thing. lost email providers and web rowsers use various technolo- �es to try to help keep people ife from these types of attacks. his may include blocking and :reening technologies if the )ntent you're receiving via nail or viewing on the inter - et appears to be suspicious. hese are all helpful, however, )u are a large part of the de- !nse strategy. Don't be lulled Lto a false sense of security by finking that your software or irdware platform will take care this problem for you - it's an Ter -changing cat and mouse game. Computer security professionals •e constantly trying to stay ahead of the game while the criminals are )nstantly adapting their methods to create new challenges. ushers are working veryhard to steal your personal information and )ur money. Hopefully this article has helped you to better understand is -growing threat. By sharing this information and these tips you'll be Aping to spread the word so thatwe can arm people with the informa- )n they need to stay safer while using the internet. it's work together to outfox the stammers and stay safe online! rLLIAM GORDONIS THE OWNER AND PRINCIPAL OFWHrrEFOX TECH,ASOUTHBURLINGTON- sED COMPANY THAT PROVIDES WINDOWS AND Lmlux TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO BVDIVIDUALS D SMALL BUSINESSES IN CHITTENDEN COUNTY. HE MAy BE REACHED AT w=FOXVT@ IAIL.COM OR WWW.WHTTEFOXVT.COM. otherpapervt.com y A -t ALo� ..V 5 AlSw Museum Services Manager Ready to advance your career in hospitality? Shelburne Museum has a fast paced, diverse position for some- one with a strong desire to care for and preserve one of Vermont's treasured institutions We have 39 buildings on 45 acres that need a keen eye for details, the ability to prioritize and organize the work load, and the skills Public Notice PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Develop- ment Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tues- day December 6, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary & final plat application #SD-16-32 of Lewis Real Estate to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of six (6) commercial buildings with a total of 27,323 sq. ft. The amendment consists of constructing a 1,800 sq. ft. building for retail use, 1233 Shelburne Road. 2. Conditional use application #CU-16-09 of lain Hoefle to allow a 572 sq. ft. attached garage addition to encroach 21 feet into the required 30 foot front yard setback requirement, 75 Davis Park- way. Master plan application #MP-16-02 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. 4. Re -opened preliminary plat application #SD-16-18 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single fam- ily dwellings. The project consists of. 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single fam- fly dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) construct- ing ten (10) 2-family dwell- ings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. November 17, 2016 Last year, That's the aver of food and foo( person in Chitte threw away Aiawho&k� remember, food i! when you're doi • awnpAlXtwu4• I n a I to any CSWD Drop -Off C( • Staeit sight cold airs perishables last longer c • cama o► 0 Choose a fi restaurant! Find a list at Take a bite out of Visit cswd.net/foodwa Preliminary Plan Application Spear Meadows Abutter List UVM & State Agricultural College c/o Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Robert & Tammy Avonda 1317 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Linda Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Muhr Trust 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Thomas & Louise Kleh, Life Estate 219 Meadowwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Jillian Bohlmann Trust 31 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Kathleen Sawtelle 1300 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 B. Grabowski & J. Milot 112 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Richard Tarrant & Tracy Appleton 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Margareta Dencker P.O. Box 1682 Olney, MD 20830-1682 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael & Mary Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 William & Tanya Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1350 Spear, LLC Gary Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Kenneth Miller 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Pinnacle At Spear HOA P.O. Box 9481 South Burlington, VT 05407 Irma Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Matt & Emily Bieber 26 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur & Thomas Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 PA2014\14008\City\Master Plan\AbuttersLabels.wpd Carlos &Bridget Marroquin Susith Wijetunga 1295 Spear Street Pinnacle at Spear HOA South Burlington, VT 05403 14 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 I Master Plan Application Spear Meadows Abutter List UVM & State Agricultural College Kathleen Sawtelle 1350 Spear, LLC c/o Campus Planning Services 1300 Spear Street Gary Farrell 109 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05405 South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert & Tammy Avonda B. Grabowski & J. Milot William & Maureen Gilbert 1317 Spear Street 112 Springhouse Road 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Linda Young Richard Tarrant & Tracy Appleton Kenneth Miller 1402 Spear Street 1404 Spear Street 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Muhr Trust Margareta Dencker Pinnacle At Spear HOA 1408 Spear Street P.O. Box 1682 P.O. Box 9481 South Burlington, VT 05403 Olney, MD 20830-1682 South Burlington, VT 05407 John Larkin City of South Burlington Irma Isham Estate 410 Shelburne Road Planning & Zoning Dept 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Thomas & Louise Kleh, Life Estate Michael & Mary Scollins Matt & Emily Bieber 219 Meadowwood Drive 214 Meadowood Drive 26 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Jillian Bohlmann Trust William & Tanya Cimonetti Arthur & Thomas Lavigne 31 Vale Drive 1393 Spear Street 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Carlos & Bridget Marroquin Susith Wijetunga 1295 Spear Street Pinnacle at Spear HOA Robert & Marjorie Skiff South Burlington, VT 05403 14 Pinnacle Drive 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington, VT 05403 Clifford & Kimberly Deetjen 41 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 P;2014\14008\0tyWasterrIanwbu«ersLaI)d%.wpd CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 16th day of Nov , 20 16, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Master Plan [type of application] # MP 16-02 {application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See attached list Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 16th day of Nov , 2016 Printed Name: Andrew Rowe Phone number and email: Andy@LDengineering.com 878-4450 Signature: Andrew Rowe °'°""^° a•e Date: November 16, 2016 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of.Service Form. Rev. 7-2012 Lamoureux Et Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists November 4, 2016 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Master Plan Review Dear Ray We are writing on behalf of Spear Meadows, Inc. to request Master Plan review for the Spear Meadows PUD. On November 1, the Development Review Board approved re -opening the Preliminary Plat hearing so that the Master Plan review and findings could be issued concurrent with the Preliminary Plat findings and decision. Master Plan review is required, pursuant to Article 15.07(B)(1), for development of more than ten dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant. A maximum of 48 dwelling units are proposed for this project. A transfer of development rights will be required to achieve the proposed density. The project is comprised of three parcels that have a total area of 25.9 acres. An existing single family home is located at 1350 Spear Street. An unoccupied single family home is located at 1302 Spear Street. A class 2 wetland that flows south to north bisects the project parcel. The easterly portion of the project parcel is in agricultural use, with a rotation of crops over the past several years (currently hay). The project is located in the neighborhood residential subdistrict of the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ-NR). The southernmost portion of the project parcel is located in the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. However, no buildings are proposed within this overlay district. The project is also subject to the wetland and surface water buffer standards of Article 12. The existing single family home at 1350 Spear Street will remain. The existing structures at 1302 Spear Street will be removed. A total of 47 new dwelling units will be constructed, in addition to the existing single family home to remain. Each dwelling unit will include a garage. Additional parking will also be available in front of the garage, in the driveway, or along one side of the street. The southwesterly portion of the parcel will be conveyed to the City. This land will initially be public open space, but may be developed as a City park in the future. The conveyance of the land will be clear on the potential future development of this parcel as a park to meet active and 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878,4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service passive recreational needs. The 6.80 acre parcel includes the southerly portion of the wetland that bisects the project, as well as upland area to the west. Pedestrian access to the public open space will be provided from Vale Drive across the wetland. In compliance with the City's Official Map, the project will extend Vale Drive from the existing cul-de-sac to the northerly boundary of the parcel. The project will also construct a 10 feet wide paved path along the easterly project boundary, from the Vale Drive cul-de-sac to the northerly boundary of the parcel. The Official Map also shows a trail or path running parallel to the northerly extension of Vale Drive. Vale Drive and Spear Meadow Road are proposed to be public streets. The northernmost segment of Vale Drive, north of Spear Meadow Road, will be privately maintained until Vale Drive is extended further north in the future. Similarly, Street `A' will be subject to an irrevocable offer of dedication as a public street, but privately owned and maintained until extended further south in the future. Private drives are proposed to serve the residential buildings as allowed by Article 15.12(D)(3). The following waivers are requested: - Reduction of the front yard setback to a minimum of 10 feet Reduction of the rear yard setback to a minimum of 20 feet Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage based upon the total project parcel area, to allow clustering of homes on smaller parcels. - Increasing the average spacing between intersections from 300'-500' to the spacing shown on the Master Plan in recognition of the parcel layout and development constraints Eliminating the dead end street length requirement in favor of providing a street connection to the adjoining parcel (proposed Street `A'). - Eliminating the lot width to depth ratio requirement Construction of the project will begin with Spear Meadow Road at Spear Street. Infrastructure and home construction will proceed easterly from Spear Street to Vale Drive in Phase 1. Phase 2 will be infrastructure and home construction along Vale Drive from north to south. There will likely be overlap in home construction between phases so that a variety of home products can be offered for sale. We have enclosed the following for your review: - Application for Master Plan Review - Application fee of $563 - 5 full size and (1) 11"x17" copy of Master Plan sheets 1-4, & MPL1 - List of abutting landowners We will email you a PDF of the plans. Please contact our office if you need any additional information. Sincerely, � r, AZI ndre owe c: Chris Snyder Gary Farrell i kar southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number MP- t� - d, (office use only) APPLICATION FOR MASTER PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being deemed incomplete, and a delay in scheduling for the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol. 747, Pgs 653-656 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone, fax & e-mail) The Snyder Group, Inc. 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 985-5722 csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN PROPERTY (i.e. fee simple, option, etc.) option 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone, fax and e-mail) 878-4450 878-3135(fax) Andrew Rowe - Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 5a) APPLICANT EMAIL ADDRESS: Andy@LDengineering.com 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (may be obtained online or at the Assessor's Office): 1640-1302/1340/1350 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): Demolition of an existing SF home and construction of 47 new dwelling units. The existing single family home at 1350 Spear Street will remain. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b) Existing uses on property (please describe sizes of each separate use, if applicable) Existing single family homes are located at 1302 Spear Street and 1350 Spear Street. The parcel at 1340 Spear Street is currently vacant. c) Proposed uses on property (please describe the size or number of units and nature of proposed uses) 48 residential dwellings, consisting of single family, duplex, and triplex buildings d) Maximum total number of residential units and/or square footage of uses to be developed, including any existing units and/or uses to remain: 48 residential dwellings, including the one existing single family dwelling to remain (1350 Spear Street) e) Maximum proposed building height (if applicable) 28 feet (pitched roof) f) Proposed phasing (please describe the number of total phases and, if applicable at this time, the number of units or square feet of uses to be proposed in the first phase): Two construction phases - 20 dwelling units in the first phase, 28 dwelling units in the second 9) MASTER PLAN UMBRELLA CRITERIA a) Total acreage of involved property(ies) 25.93 acres phase. b) Total acreage of first phase for development (if known at this time) approximately 11 acres c) Total number of residential units and/or sq ft of all uses requested 48 residential dwellings d) Existing impervious coverage, entire site (sq ft and %) 14,440 SF 1.3% e) Maximum proposed impervious coverage, entire site (sq ft and %) 340,000 SF 30% f) Maximum existing building coverage, entire site (sq ft and %) 7,700 SF 0.7% Master Plan Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 g) Maximum proposed building coverage, entire site (sq ft and %) 155,000 SF 13.7% h) Estimated number of existing PM peak hour vehicle trip ends 52 PM peak hour trips i) Maximum proposed number of PM peak house vehicle trip ends 52 PM peak hour trips j) Existing or proposed encumbrances on property (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Path, sidewalk, and utility easements proposed in connection with the proposed development. k) Proposed extension, relocation or modification of municipal facilities (sanitary, sewer, water supply, streets, stormwater, etc.) —please describe briefly Extension of municipal utilities along new streets. Watermain connection between project and existing watermain on Swift Street. New public streets to include the extension of Vale Street to the north, a new east -west street linking the Vale Drive extension to Spear Street, and short stub streets. 10) ESTIMATED FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION YEAR 2019 11) PLANS AND FEE Please submit plans showing the information listed in Section 15.07(C)(3) of the Land Development Regulations. Five full-sized, one reduced size copy (11 x 17), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be su mitted. Applic ion fee must be inc uded with the application. KomA, '/ly/-� 7 NOTE N I ICATION df ADJOINING PRO ERTY OWNE S: Notification of adjoining g property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. 1 Master Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ........... —1— ........................ ............... .......... I hereby certify that all the information request as part of this application has been submitted and is Please do not write below th' line DATE OF SUBMISSION t, I have reviewed this application and find it to be: c PLETE 0 INCOMPLETE Ad in strative—fficer --- Date of WIVAUEMP, The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify,, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist, 4 Master Plan Application F6,nr-Rev, 12-2011 Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■ A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt, see a retail ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece. associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate ■ Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee, present this delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the ■ A record of delivery (including the recipient's retail associate. signature) that is retained by the Postal Service- Restricted delivery service, which provides for a specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent. Important Reminders., Adult signature service, which requires the ■ You may purchase Certified Mail service with signee to be at least 21 years of age (not First -Class Mail®, First -Class Package Service®, available at retail). or Priority Mail® service. Adult signature restricted delivery service, which ■ Certified Mail service is notavailable for requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age international mail. and provides delivery to the addressee specified ■ Insurance coverage is notavailable for purchase by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent with Certified Mail service. However, the purchase (not available at retail). of Certified Mail service does not change the insurance coverage automatically included with certain Priority Mail items. ■ For an additional fee, and with a proper endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request the following services: - Return receipt service, which provides a record of delivery (including the recipient's signature). You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Retum Receipt,- attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; ■ To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt-0 accepted as legal proof of mailing, it should bear a USPS postmark. If you would like a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, please present your Certified Mail item at a Post Office" for postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt for your records. PS Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047 Domestic Mail Only C` m : For delivery information, visit our websi, o- Er Certified Mail Fee rl 43 $ Extra Services & Fees (check box, add fee as appropriate) (�- ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ O 0 Return Receipt (electronic) $ Postmark E3 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here 1:3 ❑ Adult Signature Required $ O ['4,Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ Postage � Total Postage and Fees u1 O f`- -------------------------- _ ---------------- ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: A. Signature X / ❑ Agent 4C - Z -1 ❑ Addressee B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No II I'III'I IIII ill I I I I II II III II II I III I I I I II (III 3. Service Type ❑ Priority Mall Express ❑ Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail- 0 ult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9403 0267 5155 1724 04 CldMail® Delivery ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Return Receipt for ❑ Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article NumhAr /Traneecfar frnm i— 1-hon -___ Collert on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑ Signature Confirmation"^ tail 7015 0640 0007 8199 3754 lail Restricted Delivery O Signature Confirmation Restricted Delivery f (over youo) PS Form 3811, April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt UNITED STATEe'V 4(: 271, 31AQ41 24)1��` F44 :11 11,711 * Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZlP+41D in this box* VI I Y"ut- suu I I-1 bUkLIN6 101" DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 USPS TRACKING# 11111111111,1111111ji1.i 111111111111111 �L, A" 11 �24-- 1,h 7 5 1 January 19, 2017 Andy Rowe Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 Re: Preliminary Plat Approval #SD-16-18, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street Dear Mr. Rowe: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on January 18, 2017. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat review application must be submitted within 12 months of this approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincere y, R y o d J. Bel Air Administrative Officer Encl CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7015 0640 0007 8199 3754 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburI.com The UNIVERSITY of VERMONT CAMPUS PLANNING SERVICES December 6, 2016 Chris Snyder Snyder Group, Inc. 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows — Water Line / Bike Path Easement Request Dear Chris, The following represents the University's response to your November 9, 2016 proposal, and as mutually discussed with you on December 5, 2016, requesting a 30' wide easement along the full eastern boundary line of the University's `Wheelock East' parcel (parcel located on the southeast corner of Swift and Spear Streets). We understand the purpose of the easement request to be two -fold within the context of your regulatory review: • to provide an 8" water line connection from the proposed Spear Meadows residential project, north to Swift Street (refer to Spear Meadows Site & Utilities Plan dated 6/6/16 (Sheet 4); and • to include within this easement a 10' wide paved (bike) path connection from north - south to Swift Street, along the eastern boundary of Spear Meadows and Wheelock East. The University understands that the requested water line easement to South Burlington is favored by the Champlain Water District to provide redundancy and improved water pressure to homes south on Spear Street, and the paved path is also favored as a future regulatory component of the City's long range circulation planning. The University has reviewed Spear Meadows' request, and offers the following response and recommendations: The University will grant the 30' (maximum) easement area to the City of South Burlington at no cost to the City of South Burlington. Our approval is conditioned on the developer's receipt of an approved permit for the project as presented. Should the Spear Meadows project not receive all necessary approvals, the University will have no obligation to provide the easement in question unless the City finances the water line and/or paved path construction. Also, should the City of South Burlington impose permit conditions in connection with the project that are not acceptable to the University, cost or otherwise, we should not have to convey the easement. Water line and 10' wide paved path to be constructed by the developer, at their cost, concurrent with the developer's Spear Meadows project construction, and to be conditioned under same City permit. This work to also include installation of landscape screening along the west edge of the easement (size/species of trees 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405-0016 Telephone (802) 656-3208, Fax (802) 656-8895 a :,� a Page 2 Spear Meadows - Water Line / Bike Path Easement Request TBID). The water and path shall be constructed within I year of the project's stormwater basin construction. The east edge of the bike path pavement will be located 5 feet (5') from the east property 4ne. The University may waive this `• for • that may impact existing trees. Final design and construction of the bike path/water will require approval by the University, There will need to be indemnity/insurance language with respect to the work performed on University property. The easement will need to have language about restoration of the University property subject to construction of the path, etc. The University requests the developer provide as part of the easement transactio and at time of construction and at their cost, a minimum of two 8" x 8" tee and valves to ••• water service connection to •- -• • future University development. The location of these connections will be determined later during agreement drafting. The University's approval is predicated on the all necessary approvals, including City of South Burlington's, and guaranteeing access (at no co • the University) and use • the water connection • the University in the future.)] Our approval is also predicated on agreement by the City of South Burlington that the easement square footage of University land will continue to be included in the University's total lot coverage calculations. The University will be able to count/calculate the square footage of University land within the easement in the University's Wheelock East overall lot coverage calculations, excluding the paved bike •.; The City •. South Burlington to • that the setback from the University boundary line will not •' impacted by the easement. 9,pecific to the paved path, the University suggests consideration of the following: The City • South Burlington •:• future options in the City's capital planning process for relocating the existing Spear/ Swift Street pedestrian / bike crossing to •• farther to the east • Swift Street and away from the existing vehicular intersection at Spear and Swift Streets. This re -alignment on Swift Street will benef the community with a safer connection/linkage through Spear Meadows and Wheelock East parcels, as the 10' wide path intersects at Swift Street. I While the University has no current plans for development of our Wheelock East site, we d* wish to ackn owledg e/ reiterate our Campus Master Plan's guiding principles to retain our options to preserve any future development rights allowed under zoning. After receipt of all local and state permits, the University suggests that all legal documents be drafted by your legal counsel. The University will assume no cost for the easement transaction, including legal expenses. Page 3 Spear Meadows - Water Line / Bike Path Easement Request The University recognizes the importance of the Spear Street Corridor and we hope our response to your easement request reinforces our interest in supporting ways to enhance the flow and safety of this corridor, with pedestrian/bicycle enhancements and connections, and, to continue to work cooperatively with the City of South Burlington to ensure our properties continue to support our academic and land use mission. Lani Ravin will be in attendance at tonight's DRB (MP-16-02 and SD-16-18 The Snyder Group, Inc.), and will be available to provide support to our position should this be of assistance to you. I look forward to discussing this request further with you and South Burlington Planning & Zoning at the appropriate time. Regards, ud� Linda Seavey Director of Campus Planning Services cc: John Evans, UVM Senior Advisor to the President & Provost Paul Conner, Director, South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department Lani Ravin, Associate Planner, UVM Campus Planning Services Attachments: Snyder Group, Inc. Easement Request, dated 11/9/16, Spear Meadows Preliminary Site Plan & Utilities Plan (6-6-16), Sheet #4 120616 Spear Meadows - Water Line / Bike Path Easement Request November 9 20!6 Linda Seavey Director Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, UT 05405-0015 Re, Spear Meadows Dear Linda, I was informed that Gary Farrell, the landowner for the past four decades, of the parcel being developed as Spear Meadows contacted you after our last meeting with the City of South Burlington. He mentioned that I should make a formal request to you for a water fine easement. Snyder Group, Inc, or an affiliated entity is proposing to develop the property to the south of the University owned property. We didshow a proposed easement along the eastern border of your property as It was our understanding that there was an agreement in place for this easement. We found out that this was not the case when you raised this concern in a letter dated 9/8/2016: We do have an alternate path for the water line and at would connect to the existing water line along Spear Street. However, South Burlington's Water District, would like the connection on Swift Street to provide redundant and higher pressured water to the corridor of homes to the south of this property. We are willing to extend the waterline in this direction, if you are wailing to rovide us with, the easement: There area couple of items to note about this easement. The pr , ed easement would run along the property line. The width of this easement would be within theVequired setback required by the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Also, we could provide'a connection point along this grater line for a future connection, if you so desire. The City of South Burlington has also required that we extend the road and bike path to the, edge of our property for your future connection. This is a benefit to you as the City will require these connections if any type of development Is planned for your property. 4078 Shelburne Road, Suite 6; Shelburne, VT 05482 NAHS 802985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax �„ snyderhomesyt.com GREEN CEATIRE9 We do believe that It makes sense for the water line easement to be located along the eastern property line and continue to Swift Street. If you are agreeable this proposed easement, 'please get in touch with me and we can arrange for the necessary documents. WSinc ly, rlSnyder Snyder Group, Inc. It OR cwxvwescuG PLAN OF GROSS COUNTRY WMERMAIN ALEDRI V IE V'� VIE SPEAR MEADOWS W 7 ------ Sim SITE PLAN,& UnLITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR 4 X -COUNTRY WATERLINE 4 UTO: 2004 Teal Mazda 6, good ondition, just inspected, 99,000 ales, heated automated leather eats, sun roof, new windshield, Tinter tires included, only one revious owner, $2,500. 802-3 10- 889.(11/17) UTO: 2006 Nissan Altima, -door, high mileage, air condi- oner, heater, good tires, every- ung works great, runs excellent, 9000BO.802-373-5879. (11/17) STATE ITEMS: Mahogany drop - !af table, seats 8, leaves, four chairs, $175. 1940's rattan couch and chair, including new cush- ions, $85. China cabinet with built-in desk, $150. Coffee table, round, wood/metal/glass, $65. 802-862-7000. (11 / 10) ITEMS: Tradesman wood work- bench, Tlong with shelf below, $80. Living Well pressure cooker, slow cooker, never used, $90.802- 999-4328.(11/10) MENORAH: Silver-plated, on pedestal, with candles, 111/2" wx 16" tall, polishes -up to a beautiful luster, $15.802-448-3786. (11 / 10) Outfoxing the Scammers CONTINUED FROM PAGE 8 .al thing. lost email providers and web rowsers use various technolo- ies to try to help keep people de from these types of attacks. his may include blocking and :reening technologies if the )ntent you're receiving via nail or viewing on the inter - et appears to be suspicious. hese are all helpful, however, )u are a large part of the de- !nse strategy. Don't be lulled Lto a false sense of security by unking that your software or udware platformwill take care this problem for you - it's an Ier-changing cat and mouse game. Computer security professionals *e constantly trying to stay ahead of the game while the criminals are )nstantly adapting their methods to create new challenges. fishers are working veryhard to steal your personal information and )ur money. Hopefully, this article has helpedyou to better understand is growing .threat. .By sharing this information and these tips you'll be Aping to spread the word so thatwe can arm people with the informa- )n they need to stay safer while using the internet. ,t's work together to outfox the scammers and stay safe online! ILLIAM GORDONIs THE owr ER AND PRINCIPAL OFWHTTEFOX TECH, A SOUTHBURuNGTON- SED COMPANY THAT PROVIDES WINDOWS AND LRvux TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO INDIVIDUALS D SMALL BUSINESSES IN CHTTTENDEN COUNTY. HE MAY BE REACHED AT WHITEFOXVT@ WL COM OR WWW.WHTTEFOXVT. COM. otherpapervt.com KK.lo-, ent, y Museum Services Manager Ready to advance your career in hospitality? Shelburne Museum has a fast paced, diverse position for some- one with a strong desire to care for and preserve one of Vermont's treasured institutions: We have 39 buildings on 45 acres that need a keen eye for details, the ability to prioritize and organize the work load, and the skills P u b I I*C,. I Notice PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURUNGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Develop- ment Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tues- day December 6, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary & final plat application #SD-16-32 of Lewis Real Estate to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of six (6) commercial buildings with a total of 27,323 sq. ft. The amendment consists of constructing a 1,800 sq. ft. building for retail use, 1233 Shelburne Road. 2. Conditional use application #CU-16-09 of lain Hoefle to allow a 572 sq. ft. attached garage addition to encroach 21 feet into the required 30 foot front yard setback requirement, 75 Davis Park- way. Master plan application #MP-16-02 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. 4. Re -opened preliminary plat application #SD-16-18 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single fam- ily dwellings. The project consists of. 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single fam- ily dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) construct- ing ten (10) 2-family dwell- ings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. November 17, 2016 Last year, 143 Pour That's the aver of food and foo( person in Chitte threw away remember, food a when you're do 6o npaQt *euq o, in a I to any CSWD Drop -Off CE St &eit tight cold airs perishables last longer c v aut? Choose a fi restaurant! Find a list at Take a bite out of Visit cswd.net/foodwa Lindsey Britt From: Daniel Seff <DSeff@vtlaw1.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 10:52 AM To: Paul Conner; ray; Lindsey Britt Cc: wagvermont@gmail.com Subject: November 1st DRB Meeting / Spear Meadows Attachments: Seff.Miller.11.01.16 (00163209xCOEA5).PDF; DRB Decision re Gilbert et al. Motion to Dismiss Farrell Preliminary Plat App. (11-1-2011) (00163179xCOEA5).PDF Good morning, Paul, Ray and Lindsey. I am unable to attend tonight's DRB meeting concerning Spear Meadows. Attached as a two -page PDF file is a letter dated today from me to the DRB concerning that project. Also attached as a separate four -page PDF file is a copy of In re Master Plan Application #MP-11-01 and Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-07, Findings of Fact and Decision (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd. Nov. 1, 2011), which is the lone attachment to my letter of today. I would be grateful if you would forward the attached letter and DRB Decision to DRB Chairperson Bill Miller and the rest of the DRB members ahead of tonight's meeting. (Bill Gilbert is planning to attend tonight and he will endeavor to bring one or more hard copies of the attached with him for the DRB.) If you do not receive the attachments or are unable to open them, please email me or call me at 802-862-0500. Thanks very much. Best regards, Daniel A. Seff, Esq. Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC 30 Main Street - Suite 210 1 PO Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 voice — 802-862-0500 #211 1 fax - 802-862-8176 dsef[@vtlawl.com www.vtlawl.com This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies or records of the original message. Thank you. Pursuant to U.S. Treasury regulations, if this message contains any information that may be considered advice concerning federal tax issues, please be advised that it is not a formal legal opinion and may not be used by any person for the avoidance of Federal tax penalties. BURAK,,,ANDERSON kX MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax: 802 862.8176 www.vtlawl.com November 1, 2016 Re: Snyder Group, Inc. Preliminary Plat Application # SD-16-18 Dear Chairperson Miller: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced Application for Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group" or the "Group"). I am unable to attend tonight's DRB meeting, so I would be grateful if you would include this letter and the accompanying attachment with the materials for the above -referenced Application. Section 15.07(C)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations ("SBLDR") requires that a master plan application be filed within six months after the final DRB meeting on the sketch plan. According to my records, the final sketch plan meeting for Docket Number SD- 14-37 took place on January 19, 2016. Accordingly, the Applicant needed to file a master plan application by July 19, 2016.1 I understand from an October 27, 2016 letter from Andrew Rowe, P.E. of_Lamoureux & Dickinson to Administrative Officer Ray Belair that the Applicant is asking the DRB to re -open the above -referenced preliminary plat application for the purpose of allowing the Applicant to 1 Section 15.07(C)(1) allows the DRB and an applicant to agree on a filing deadline for the master plan application of longer than six months — but not longer than two years — after the final DRB meeting on the sketch plan. Of course, any such agreement would need to occur prior to the expiration of the initial six-month period, something which did not happen here. J Letter to DRB Chair Bill Miller November 1, 2016 Page 2 of 2 BURAK ANDFRSON & MELLONIPLC file a master plan application. My clients maintain that re -opening the preliminary plat application would not fix the untimeliness issue described in the preceding paragraph. This is an important matter, as my clients have spent a lot of time and money in DRB proceedings opposing what they consider to be an unlawful use of transferable development rights as well as an unlawful dead-end street longer than 200 feet (please see my October 3, 2016 letter to you, the text of which is incorporated herein by reference). They are concerned that if the DRB allows the Applicant to proceed now with what a court could later deem to be a fatally untimely master plan application, we all may be back before the DRB on a remand without having received a ruling on the TDR and dead-end street issues. In the interests of avoiding potential time-consuming and expensive remand proceedings, my clients suggest respectfully that the most logical course here would be for the DRB to direct the Applicant to file a new sketch plan application and proceed from there accordingly. The DRB's precedent in an analogous situation supports this course of action. See In re Master Plan Application #MP-11-01 and Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-07, Findings of Fact and Decision, slip op. at 2 (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd. Nov. 1, 2011) (rejecting as untimely the applicant's preliminary plat application as having been filed more than six months after the last sketch meeting, in violation of SBLDR § 15.08(A), "the plain language of which is not in dispute") (footnote omitted). See also id. at 2 n.3 ("... the six-month deadline was missed, and the DRB believes that submission of new sketch plan is warranted in this case"). A courtesy copy of the DRB's November 1, 2011 Findings of Fact and Decision is attached for ease of reference. On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB for its consideration and courtesies. Respectfully submitted, ls/ Daniel A. Seff Daniel A. Seff Attachment (1) cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail w/attachment) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail w/attachment) Ms. Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner (via e-mail w/attachment) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail w/attachment) Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail w/attachment) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail w/attachment) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail w/attachment) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail w/attachment) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail w/attachment) Nip-11-01 SD-11-07 ♦AWW • ♦ „ • FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Master Plan application #MP-11-01 and preliminary plat application #SD-11-07 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 25 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 22 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 134.0, and 1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on September 20, 2011. Eric Farrell represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: Notice of Decision Regarding Timeliness of Preliminary Plat Filing This matter was consolidated for hearing purposes such that, on September 20, 2011, that DRB heard evidence and argument regarding both an appeal by Appellants/Interested Persons, William and Maurene Gilbert, et al. (hereinafter "the Gilberts"), from a decision of the Administrative Officer to warn Master Plan Application #MP-11-01 and Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-07 (the "Applications") for hearing before the DRB on August 3, 2011, and their request to "dismiss" the Applications for lack of DRB jurisdiction.' A separate decision has been issued addressing the appeal. Relevant Background Facts It is undisputed that this Board held a public meeting on July 6, 2010, on FRE's sketch plan application (#SD-10-20). On August 11, 2010, the applicant, Farrell Real Estate ("FRE") submitted Preliminary Plat Application#SD-10-28 and Master Plan Application #MP-10-01 to the City. However, FRE withdrew those applications on January 27, 2011, due to changes in project boundary lines proposed after the sketch plan meeting. The following day, on January 28 2011, FRE submitted the Applications to the City. The Gilberts argue that FRE failed to 1 The Gilberts seek an Order remanding the Applications back to the sketch plan stage of the subdivision review process. Page 1 MP-11-01 SD-11-07 submit its application for preliminary plat approval within the time required by the City's Land Development Regulations and that the DRB, consequently, cannot review it. Recision Regarding Timeliness of Preliminary Plat Filing As noted above, the Gilberts have asked this Board to dismiss the preliminary plat application for failure to comply with the requirements of Section 15.06(C) and 15.08(A) of the City's Land Development Regulations.2 Those provisions address the timing of plat submission for minor and major subdivision review, respectively. Section 15.08(A), in particular, provides that "[a]fter classification of the proposed subdivision as a major subdivision and within six (6) months of the meeting on the sketch plan, the applicant shall file an application for the approval of a preliminary plat with the Administrative Officer." (Emphasis added) In this case, the Applicant, FRE, did not meet this requirement. As noted above, the last sketch plan meeting for this project was held on July 6, 2010. Applications #SD-10-28 and #MP-10-01 were initially submitted in a timely matter, but those applications were withdrawn on or about January 27, 2011. The Applications that replaced them and that are at issue here (#SD-11-07 and #MP-11- 01) were not submitted within six months of the meeting on the sketch plan. Therefore, the Applicant failed to comply with the requirements of § 15.08(A), the plain language of which is not in dispute. 3 Moreover, as the Gilberts correctly observe, the new (2011) applications for preliminary plat and master plan approval have never been subject to sketch plan review. Although the Applicant argues that the new applications are substantially the same as the old (i.e., except for minor changes to boundaries, etc.), and therefore can "piggyback" on the July 2010 sketch plan review for the withdrawn applications, the Land Development Regulations do not appear to contemplate this process, and the so-called "minor" changes to boundaries reflected in the new preliminary plat/master plan applications implicate a substantial number of additional property owners who apparently did not receive notice of the prior sketch plan meeting. The DRB believes that it would be reasonable, under the circumstances, for the Applicant to provide new posting and notice to property owners impacted by changed boundaries, and to submit a new sketch plan for review by the DRB.a Conclusion For all of the foregoing reasons, it is the determination of the DRB that preliminary plat and master plan review shall not proceed until a new sketch plan meeting has been held, with 2 The Gilberts have styled their request as a "motion to dismiss." While the DRB acknowledges and understands the Gilberts' request, it does not wish to encourage parties that come before it to engage in overly legalistic "motion practice." The DRB is a lay board, comprised primarily of non -attorneys, and it is both expensive and time- consuming for the Board to attempt to address complex legal motions lice those filed in this case. 3 By this decision, the DRB specifically does not decide whether failure to meet the 6-month requirement is "jurisdictional," as the Gilberts assert, or merely a procedural prerequisite. It is clear, however, that the 6-month deadline was missed, and the DRB believes that submission of a new sketch plan is warranted in this case. 4 The DRB understands that, as of the date of this decision, the Applicant has already submitted a new sketch plan application. Therefore, the Gilberts request for a "remand" for this purpose is essentially moot. Page 2 NW-11-01 SD-11-07 proper posting and notice to adjoining land owners per the requirements of 24 V.S.A. §4464 and the City's Land Development Regulations. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont, this 1 st day of November, 2011. Chair Page 3 IDLamoureux &t Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists October 27, 2016 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Preliminary Plat Review SD # 16-18 Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of Spear Meadows, Inc. to request that the Preliminary Plat hearing for application SD #16-18 be re -opened. The purpose of re -opening the hearing is so that a Master Plan application can be reviewed by the Development Review Board, with Master Plan findings issued concurrent with the Preliminary Plat findings and decision. As discussed, this request will be presented to the DRB at their next meeting, on November 1. We will plan to attend this meeting in case the Board has questions. We understand that if the hearing is re -opened, Staff will suggest that it be continued to December 20. A Master Plan application will be submitted to your office early next week. Please contact our office if you need any additional information. Sin Andrew f;owe P.E. c: Chris Snyder Gary Farrell 14 Morse Drive, Essex Junction, VT 05452 802.878,4450 www.LDengineering.com Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service ray From: Ychmn <jkchmn@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:44 PM To: Paul Conner; ray; csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com Cc: Simoneau, Mike; Maggie Leugers Subject: R&P Committee resolution All, Chris Snyder attended the Recreation and Parks Committee meeting October 17, 2016, and presented Snyder Spear Meadows Master Site Plan. The committee approved a motion to approve the site plan, and to recommend that an appropriate boardwalk be constructed across the wetlands on the path. Respectfully, Jennifer Kochman Chair, Recreation and Parks Committee TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner SUBJECT: SD-16-18 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street — The Snyder Group, Inc. DATE: October 4, 2016 Development Review Board meeting Continued preliminary plat application #SD-16-18 of The Snyder Group, Inc. for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 18 single family dwellings, 3) constructing three (3) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing ten (10) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Since the DRB meeting on September 20, 2016 staff has received the following comments from Justin Rabidoux of Public Works in an email dated September 29, 2016: 1 reviewed the traffic study for the referenced project submitted by L&D on behalf of the applicant. l support its findings with one exception — a southbound on Spear left turn lane needs to be added to this project to improve overall access, circulation and safety to the general area. The applicant has, under separate cover, sent over what that lane would look like and 1 approve of its design. I encourage the DRB to add this to the project and I suspect the applicant would be accept that condition. DPW staff has gone over the overall plans with Andy Rowe from L&D numerous times and each time minor tweaks have been made to pedestrian issues and l think the plan is acceptable at this point. I want to use this opportunity to remind the applicant that all pavement markings have to be Type 1 Permanent markings and preapproved by DPW prior to installation. Thanks, Justin Rabidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer The left turn lane discussed above is part of the packet prepared for this meeting to be reviewed by the Board. 1. Staff recommends the Board support the comments from Public Works and the updated plan for a left turn lane on the southbound side of Spear Street as presented by the applicant. At the September 20, 2016 DRB meeting the Board discussed when and if dead end roads may be acceptable. The Board Chair requested the following pertinent portion (Section 15.12.D.4) of the Land Development Regulations be included in this memo: 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com (4) Connections to adjacent parcels. If the DRB finds that a roadway extension or connection to an adjacent property may or could occur in the future, whether through City action or development of an adjacent parcel, the DRB shall require the applicant to construct the connector roadway to the property line or contribute to the cost of completing the roadway connection. a. In any such application, the DRB shall require sufficient right-of-way to be dedicated to accommodate two (2) lands of vehicle travel, City utilities, and a ten foot wide grade -separated recreation path. (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the DRB to grant waivers of the public roadway standards subject to the provisions of Section 15.12(D)(4). BURAK ERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL on October 3rd and VIA HAND DELIVERY on October 4th Mr. Bill Miller, Acting Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402.0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax: 802 862.8176 waryuvtlawlxom October 3, 2016 Re: Snyder Group, Inc. Preliminary Plat Application # SD-16-18 Dear Chairperson Miller: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced Application for Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the. Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group" or the "Group"). I am unable to attend the October 4, 2016 DRB meeting, so I would be grateful if you would include this letter with the materials for the above -referenced Application. The Applicant seeks DRB approval for as many as seventeen Transferable Development Rights -based units of density in order to add to the property's base density of thirty-one units, for a maximum of forty-eight units. The Neighbors Group continues to maintain that the TDR Bylaw in the South Burlington Land Development Regulations ("SBLDR") is invalid and unenforceable because it fails to comply with State law, including without limitation 24 V.S.A. § 4423, and also because it is unconstitutional under the standards set out in the Vermont Supreme Court case of In re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC, 2008 VT 110, 185 Vt. 201, 969 A.2d 47. The Neighbors Group assumes for purposes of this letter that the DRB is correct when it asserts that it does not have jurisdiction to declare a City bylaw invalid and/or unconstitutional. Letter to DRB Acting Chair Bill Miller October 3, 2016 Page 2 of 3 BumK ANDERSON & MELLONIPLc However, the DRB does have discretion under the TDR Bylaw to deny an applicant excess TDR- based density. See SBLDR § 9.13(C)(1)-(2),I The Neighbors Group suggests respectfully that the best course of action would be for the DRB to request that the Applicant revise the project's design to a more reasonable and realistic density of thirty-one units or less. If the Applicant fails to do so, the DRB should exercise its discretion and deny the Applicant any TDR-based density. In that connection, a discussion of the Applicant's proposed 320-foot dead-end street ("Street `A"') is in order. Currently, proposed Street `A' contains eight units of density. The Applicant is attempting to use TDR-based density for Street `A,' which the Neighbors Group considers highly improper. Dead-end streets of any length in the Southeast Quadrant are "strongly discouraged." SBLDR § 9.08(A)(2)(b). And dead-end streets longer than 200 feet are prohibited in the SEQ. Id. (The admonitory phrase, "strongly discouraged" appears only twice in the 332-page SBLDR: In Section 9.08(A)(2)(b) concerning dead-end streets in the SEQ, and in a provision dealing with "blank walls" in City Center.) At the last DRB meeting, one or more DRB members referenced an unspecified SBLDR provision purportedly providing that dead-end streets can be extended beyond 200 feet if the neighboring parcel might be developed some day. The Neighbors Group assumes for purposes of this letter that this is the provision in question: Connections to adjacent parcels. If the DRB finds that a roadway extension or connection to an adjacent property may or could occur in the future, whether through City action or development of an adjacent parcel, the DRB shall require the applicant to construct the connector roadway to the property line or contribute to the cost of completing the roadway connection. SBLDR § 15.12(D)(4). See also SBLDR § 9.08(A)(2)(c) ("Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4)."). The Neighbors Group maintains that Sections 9.08(A)(2)(c) and/or 15.12(D)(4) do not permit the creation of dead-end streets longer than 200 feet. Rather, the Group submits that the correct reading of these provisions is that a dead-end street shorter than 200 feet could be extended up to a total length of no more than 200 feet under the circumstances described in Section 15.12(D)(4). If the interpretation were otherwise, the 200-foot limitation and the strong admonition in Section 9.08(A)(2)(b) against dead-end streets would have no meaning. The 200-foot dead-end street length limitation is sacrosanct in the Planned Unit Development context, as well. See, ems, SBLDR § 15.12(J) ("The length of a dead-end street 1 The Neighbors Group maintains that the standardless discretion permitted by Section 9.13(C)(1)-(2) renders the TDR Bylaw unconstitutional. See generally JAM Golf, 2008 VT 110, ¶ 17 ("all ordinances are subject to the limits of our Constitution, and we will not enforce laws that are vague or those that delegate standardless discretion to town zoning boards"). �r ) Letter to DRB Acting Chair Bill Miller October 3, 2016 Page 3 of 3 BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONIPLC shall be subiect to the review and approval of the Fire Chief and City Engineer and these Regulations.") (emphasis added). The Applicant's proposed Street `A' presents an example of why the 200-foot limitation in Section 9.08(A)(2)(b) should be considered mandatory and non-waivable. The notion of extending Street `A' into the Gilberts' 1400 Spear Street parcel someday would result in a dead- end street that is even longer than the currently proposed 320 feet, thereby making the hypothetical eventual version of dead-end Street `A' that much more violative of the prohibition in Section 9.08(A)(2)(b) against dead-end streets longer than 200 feet. Put differently, the 200- foot rule would be toothless surplusage if it could be avoided by advocating that a (strongly discouraged) proposed dead-end street needs to be longer than 200 feet now because someone might want to make it into an even longer dead-end street at some hypothetical point in the distant future. On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB for its consideration and courtesies. Respectfully submitted, ls/ Daniel A. Seff Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) A PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND SIGN LEGEND O SYMBOL MARKING LEGEND 0 LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN, —S-yam— ONLY S— NEW SEWER LINE & MANHOLE ® 24' STOP BAR VR-921 (30' X 36' -- NEW CATCH BASIN. PIPE B UNDERORAIN OC 4" SOLID WHITE LINE eRo� FINISH GRADE CONTOURf LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT, w N NEW WATER MAIN a HYDRANT Q 4- DOTTED WHITE LINE ®afl R3-7 (30" X 30") PROJECT PROPERTY UNE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ® 4' DOUBLE YELLOW UNE ABUTTING PROPERTY UNE EXISTING TREE UNE ® 8" YELLOW LINE 0 go�� 0 f$l� W � �)K EXISTING TREES, TREE REMOVAL m WORD MARKING YT ors ® PROPOSED ROAD WIDENING — — — — — — — 3SO - — — — — — — - EXISTING CONTOUR DITCH CENTERLINE W EXISTING WATER UNE SIGNS —SU 3— EXIST. SEWER MANHOLE 8 SEWER LINE 1. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON NEW 2' Ep' UTILITY POLE & OVERHEAD WIRE SQUARE STEEL SIGN POSTS WITH ANCHORS. EXISTING FENCE SEE VTRANS STANDARD T-45 FOR POST AND ANCHOR DETAILS. _____________� EXISTING CATCH BASIN E CULVERT 2. ALL NEW SIGNS SHALL MEET THE ® EXISTING MAILBOX REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS, THE 2008 MLJTCD, AND THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGNS 2012 SUPPLEMENT. 3. ALL SIGNS WITH BE INSTALLED WA 7' HEIGHT CLEARANCE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN II I L_ I TO BE REMOVED AND A — — _ II II O (25)'WW1.- UILgNNREMOVEED 10IBLOG. ]N.T•8B%STRM.Y6 NEW CB U N RIM•3Bi.8N DEIDBTNGATOGET �/yy 16' OUT • 386.10 RIVEWAY TO BE I I ® LI REMOVED 1N0 LF OF NEW I6'HDPE(SL) 1r �I -- INV N• 380.02 I I 3 I I 38fi INVS AST L J I I E%ISnNG tY CUR EXISTING RETAINING I T Q 382 INV N•300.03 WALL ANDBPLANTNG I 3� INV S • ]N3.ST DRAWEE CRIVEWAV AREA TO L REMOVED 3 11 (TO BE REMOVED) TO BE REMOVED _r -J '-' 3N 3 REPASVREPAVE rREPNEW EDGE OP ♦PAVED 0 Vl EXISRNG ASPIWLT MVEMB2T 3 3 DRVEWAY E%I6nNG ASPHALT / MMll2E11 tYPE / EXISTNG4 --OwvEwAY f— V H UNE - 'd82 J00 306 ` _ - —T- 3B6 \ _ 'S' EMSPNO EDGE 4'PAVE9 6LE_ ` ) -- ) .... .. .. .. .. �•. OF PAVEMENT .�. 82101ADEA V '/ TAD ANTCNTAVEMFNT �_/oRAv`EL-� f 4 -- o ......... �. ....... T ..............E . \ EGAB VAwErD _ ... SP.. ..... __. ........ �..... \ ` O ._ _ ` __ �, -I MATCHPAVBAENT RSTREET O _,.....-'° _.. ASPHALT ORA .� GMVEL ` CONC. P�VEWAV � ---- ------------- \ APRON EMS,TING DOU / Mom' Y� ! - - �� \•-K - - - ?.- �~ -- - 3M� dBi ! �980— - _'.-'� _ ✓ YELLOW UIES 9, q , VV EAST-6' I J °l ( �: , 1 L✓ lL _ _8A— _. WHTE UNE 4 w 1r'� TElER1DlE PEDAlI I -�N-� B.ECIIOC HS 1N0 ELECTRIC EDSTALS ..(I Sp 2 22S N�E6FAL r LATCH BASIN RIM • 377.07 \ \ GRAPHIC SCALE 30 D m In THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY IS 3U . 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION (In le•0 1 Incn =Jan. NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE REMOVED BY GRINDING USING A DIAMOND GRADE GRINDER (REFER TO VTRANS SPECIFICATIONS 046.12 REMOVAL OF PRIOR TO PAVING, COLD Ptq.NE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS) EXISTING PAVEMENT 2. TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MUTCD a3/16 CREATED SHEET FOR LEFT TURN Np6 SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDENING 2' TYPE IV BITUMINOUS CONCRETE STANDARDS. REVISIONS 1' MIN. SEE PLANS PAVEMENT WEAR COURSE THESE BANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF 3. COORDINATE WITH GMP ON UTILITY POLE ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT MINIMUM 4" TYPE II BITUMINOUS RELOCATION WITHIN LANE WIDENING LIMITS ON (SPEAR STREET) CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE SPEAR STREET. SKETCH CONCEPT OR MATCH EXISTING. MAX. 7' LIFTS PRELIMINARY 2'VMDE AGGREGATE SHOULDER 4. RELOCATION OF MAILBOXES SHALL BE IN FINAL '.. / FT - (VTRANS SPEC.704.4A) ACCORDANCE WITH VTRANS STANDARD J-3, 0 RECORD DRAWING 4 1 4'TOPSOIL, SEED MAILBOX SUPPORT DETAILS. pro no. EXISTING SUBBASE - _ _ AND MILCH SPEAR MEADOWS sU4vey EXISTING GROUND A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D d i 61 COURSE GRADED CRUSHED SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON as Sn GRAVEL FOR SUBBASE ABR EXISTING (VTRANS SPEC.704.05) TOWn SUBGRADE ABR 18'. DENSE GRADED CRUSHED STONE (VTRANS SPEC. 704.06A) SPEAR STREET TURN LANE checked ae GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 06-06-16 LAMOUREUX&r,,I— soN SCOIe As NOTED ROAD WIDENING DETAIL NITS Cn, VlUREUgineer, Inc. IV Mu (,:" N Fssas 3uncliva `/1 01J52 aoz-a)a-w 15 I �1 8COLW8 1180-0OR11 8' ��� �n nlitr�cn weTw � 4 J.KELLEY 184001Saa �\ 1 1 EXISTINGHOUSEANI LEGEND PROJECTBWNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT- - — — — — — — — — — WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER vv EDGE OF WETIANO TREEUM EXISTING CONTWR T YPICAL NEW - I STREET LIGHT I iP PAVED PATH I I� I -L- T T O BIEBER �� I 1]l2-0BOR 2HgApgG I BARIYAIWN nsxaooze +'- C1ASS2WSBANO 1 ICI --i \ I t810M408 I 1 M. DEINCKEII 1e 438 II II II ( I lip II I it I li I� III II II I II � I I pY4 I I I� II u I I I I 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1. 0 50 1. 200 4aa 1 incM1 = 1 W fl. BUILDING SUMMARY 18 SINGLE FAMILY CARRIAGE HOMES 20 DUPLEX HOME UNITS (10 BUILDINGS) 9 TRIPLEX TOWNHOME UNITS(3 BUILDINGS) 1 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO REMAIN 48 TOTAL HOMES SHEETINDEX 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN JS SIGNS & PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2 SITE & UTILITIES NORTH 3 SITE & UTILITIES SOUTH 4 SITE & UTILITIES PINNACLE AT SPEAR & X-COUNTRY WATERLINE 5 PROFILE- SPEAR MEADOW ROAD 6 PROFILE -VALE DRIVE 7 PROFILE - VALE DRIVE & STREET A 8 LANDSCAPE PLAN 9 EROSION PROTECTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 10 DETAILS&SPECIFICATIONS - STREETS 11 DETAILS&SPECIFICATIONS-SEWER&STORM 12 DETAILS&SPECIFICATIONS-WATER 13 SEWERPUMPSTATION 14 DETAILS&SPECIFICATIONS- EPSC 15 DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS - STORM PONDS PI-1 PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT PL2 SUBDIVISION & FOOTPRINT LOT PLAT RSW Series RSW"" LED 91n11 L.ft— - Small Nrod.d DIMHPNM f 'NSW 4x 11 ggWwMu M Ngk 1 wWl Nm mun apNl Mg �"� pM -xl MN4 wwN INLItl Nwwlpnln C4Y NNV Nw J gw 1 14 NW N IY ngwJglen xJ I mnN4W9anu Y.NNNH mNlxlNrNUCN(IYiMly tl4si 9MN mlNwa gxngewwmgl tNN.M ANMNMHMiRMOwry �`�..{: PMvmind Wmmnry it UIILNx CnNWwWNxmixxmWW MBM"NxetNl Illlgxw UYln III IPW NrnNnMwgNlx Ig1 NmNk IJ•�gNtl-wlnkl�h .lontl •- ro A"'•\ LNWYI WrrnNg'l1C Wlw RNi„ Nxg . ACCHNNtl !gr _.. tlllmni WWtl LgMllgxllw w4mw.N« W nr. ru n. g. rvrw Or4wle'll nWmNMn «,Ng Nuwnn.gkr.:Nw.ggx„ll.rr.k 0 �'rv.rf iw•n wx.., 1iwG..N `� Q wxrt.gwwwg•www.NrwrMx -e rwww-i.e. �.n+ m•nikww. N..ox:weLnWmtg ®• ® CREE uN, YIMMywxrMywy r—l... 11-1IM-411 cswx wwew..c../.«.N. 1I lan.11nve,,,- REVISIONS THESEPUNS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD I OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOM.. SHEETS SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY FINAL RECORD DRAWING proj. n SPEAR MEADOWS t4008 Mey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR drawn OVERALL chBecked LANDOWNER: SPEAR MEADDWS.INa. SITE PLAN DJG dOl¢ ate 1MSPEARSTREET SouTHBURuHaTON.VTaB1a3 06-06-16 LAMOOREUgi & DICIUNSON tale AS NOTED APPLICANT THE GROUP.INC. Na78SHELSU 5HELBURNE ROAD,SMTEB SHELBURNE. Via54B2 COnNYlling EngineenEnc. 14 Morse D— sh L, n0. E— Jmrcli- Vr O5452 Tel: 802-87"50 MEMO To: Robert Rushford From: Jeff Polubinski Subject: Snyder Homes - Spear Meadows Date: January 13, 2016 You asked whether the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (the "LDRs") would prohibit the construction of a dead-end roadway longer than 200 feet in the Snyder Homes ("Snyder") Spear Meadows project (the "Project"). Background The Project is located within the Neighborhood Residential Zoning District (SEQ-NRT) in the Southeast Quadrant of the City of South Burlington. Due to a number of topographic constraints, such the presence of wetlands and the unusual shape of the Project parcel, Snyder has proposed a dead-end roadway as part of the Project, which is longer than 200 feet. Section 9.08 of the LDRs identifies a number of "dimensional and design requirements" in the SEQ-NRT Zoning district, including Section 9.08 (A)(2), which provides that: (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sacs) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). Discussion The LDRs provide a number of mechanisms that allow the DRB to "waive" the requirements of Section 9.08(A)(2)(b). First, the Project is being developed as a Planned Unit Development, which, by definition, "may deviate from bylaw requirements that are otherwise applicable to the area in which it is located with respect to the area, density or dimensional requirements or allowable number of structures and uses per lot as established in any one or more districts created under the provisions of these regulations." LDRs, Article 2, Definition of Planned Unit Development (emphasis added). Specifically, as it relates to roadways, the Planned Unit Development section of the LDRs in several places affords great flexibility to the DRB. For example, Section 15.12(A) provides that: The arrangement of streets in the subdivision shall provide for the continuation of arterial, collector and local streets of adjoining subdivisions and for proper projection of arterial, collector and local streets through adjoining properties that are not yet subdivided, in order to make possible necessary fire protection, movement of traffic and construction or extension, presently or when later required, of needed utilities and public services such as recreation paths, sewers, water and drainage facilities. Where, in the opinion of the Development Review Board topographic or other conditions make such continuance undesirable or impracticable, the above conditions may be modified. Emphasis added. Furthermore, Section 15.12(D)(5) of LDRs state that: (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the DRB to grant waivers of public roadway standards subject to the provisions of § 15.12(D)(4). Second, Section 14.07(E) of the DRB, which details the review process for Site Plan & Conditional Use Review, provides additional flexibility to the DRB, stating that: Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. In a previous but similar development configuration for the Project, a dead-end road was proposed in excess of 200 feet to access the northwest corner of the Project site. In its review of the road length issue, the South Burlington Planning and Zoning staff stated, in reference to Section 9.08, that: This guideline is waivable. Given the unique shape of the lot, the location of the wetlands on site, and the existence of two access points, and the close proximity of the cul-de-sac to an adjacent lot with development potential, and that the dead-end road is proposed only to access a park, staff is comfortable with this request. The Board has previously discussed this request several times and expressed favorability of the proposal. City of South Burlington, Department of Planning & Zoning, Staff Notes for Preliminary Plat Application 4SD-11-51, February 16, 2012 (emphasis added). Conclusion Because the LDRs afford the DRB broad discretion to waive dimensional requirements set forth elsewhere in the LDRs for Planned Unit Developments and because Planning and Zoning Staff have stated that the road length provisions of Section 9.08 are waivable for a previous but similar configuration of this Project, the DRB has the flexibility to waive or modify certain design and dimensional standards in the LDRs, including Section 9.08. Furthermore, in order to minimize -2- the impact to wetlands on the Project parcel and in order to maximize the usefulness of the Project park, the DRB should waive Section 9.08 of the LDRs. <1085523v150P> -3- Spear Meadows Landscape Plan Lamoreaux and Dickenson Consulting Engineers 8/10/16 Species Selection • Red Maple cultivars aren't well suited to the clay soils in this part of the city. The neutral to alkaline conditions often results in manganese deficiency. Recommend substituting 'Celebration' or 'Sienna Glen' Freeman Maple I'd recommend limiting the use of Tupelo as a street tree as it can be difficult to establish and also requires slightly acidic soil. It would be worth trying in small numbers, particularly near the stormwater pond or in a wetland buffer I'd recommend substituting 'Accolade' or 'Triumph' Elm for'Princeton' Elm. Princeton Elms exhibit a very dense branching habit which I believe will result in structural problems as the trees mature Preliminary Plan Application Spear Meadows Abutter List UVM & State Agricultural College c/o Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Robert & Tammy Avonda 1317 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David & Linda Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Diane Muhr Trust 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 John Larkin 410 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Thomas & Louise Kleh, Life Estate 219 Meadowwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Jillian Bohlmann Trust 31 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Kathleen Sawtelle 1300 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 B. Grabowski & J. Milot 112 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Richard Tarrant & Tracy Appleton 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Margareta Dencker P.O. Box 1682 Olney, MD 20830-1682 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Dept 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael & Mary Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 William & Tanya Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gary Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Kenneth Miller 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Pinnacle At Spear HOA P.O. Box 9481 South Burlington, VT 05407 Irma Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Matt & Emily Bieber 26 Vale Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Arthur & Thomas Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Carlos & Bridget Marroquin Susith Wijetunga P:\2014\14008\Cay\Preliminary\Abutterno ce\AbuttersLabeN.wpd 1295 Spear Street Pinnacle at Spear HOA South Burlington, VT 05403 14 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 2nd day of August , 20 16, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Spear Meadows [type of application] # SD 16-18 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See attached list Dated at Essex [town/city], Vermont, this 2nd day of August , 2016 Printed Name: Andrew Rowe Phone number and email: 802-878-4450 Andy@LDengineering.com Signature: Andrew Rowe R. A.dQ— _•• _ •p• Date: Atjqtist 21 9016 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 W11, PAhh :06010011W south urnton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- - (ofticc use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑✓ Preliminary ❑Final PUD Being Requested? ❑✓ Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol. 100, Pgs 42-43 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) The Snyder Group, Inc. 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 985-5722 csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Andrew Rowe - Lamoureux & Dickinson 14 Morse Drive Essex, VT 05452 878-4450 878-3135(fax) a. Contact email address: Andy@LDengineering.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1640-1302/1340/1350 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Demolition of an existing SF home and construction of 18 single family homes, 10 duplex buildings, and 3 triplex buildings. The existing single family home at 1350 Spear Street will remain. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Existing single family homes are located at 1302 Spear Street and 1350 Spear Street. The parcel at 1340 Spear Street is currently vacant. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): One existing single family home, 18 new single family homes, 10 new duplex buildings, and 3 new triplex buildings. A public park parcel is proposed to be conveyed to the City. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing buildings = 7,700 SF Proposed buildings (new & existing to remain) = 142,780 SF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): The new single family homes, duplex, and triplex buildings will be two stories. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): One existing residential unit will be demolished. One existinq residential unit will remain. 47 new residential units are proposed. g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): not applicable - residential PUD h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): A portion of the project parcel is located in the Dorest Park View Protection Zone. The parcel is in the Potash Brook watershed and is subject to the Surface Water Protection Standards. i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. The project involves 3 existing parcels that will be merged and subdivided as shown on the property plats. Both footprint lots are proposed for the new homes and open space parcels are proposed. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 25.93 acres b. Building Coverage: Existing 7700 Proposed 152,280 (acres /sq. ft.) square feet 0.7 % square feet 13.5 oho c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 14,440_ square feet 1.3 _ oho Proposed 323,115 square feet 28.6 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) Wetland and/or buffer impacts are associated with the street/utility crossing, stormwater ponds, and access drive to the public park. c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 16 acres SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. BtAding (including interior renovations) 8,450,000 b. Landscaping: $ 107,450 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) sitework & utilities = $ 1,500,000 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 52 PM peak hour trips 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 7:30-8:30 AM & 4:30-5:30 PM 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Frida 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 2019 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the ity fee schedule fo de s. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of DJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled ATURE OF APPLICANT /Ial l Gary Farrell -Spear Meadows, Inc. PERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / I have reviewed this prclimina plat application and find it to be: Complete n Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I Lamoureux Ft Dickinson Engineers Surveyors Planners Wetland & Soil Scientists June 17, 2016 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Preliminary Subdivision/PUD Review Dear Ray: We are writing on behalf of The Snyder Group, Inc. to request preliminary subdivision review of the Spear Meadow planned unit development. The Development Review Board last reviewed the sketch plan application on January 19, 2016. The project is comprised of three parcels that have a total area of 25.9 acres. An existing single family home is located at 1350 Spear Street. An unoccupied single family home is located at 1302 Spear Street. A class 2 wetland that flows south to north bisects the project parcel. The easterly portion of the project parcel is in agricultural use, with a rotation of crops over the past several years (currently hay). The project is located in the neighborhood residential subdistrict of the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ-NR). The southernmost portion of the project parcel is located in the Dorset Park View Protection Zone. However, no buildings are proposed within this overlay district. The project is also subject to the wetland and surface water buffer standards of Article 12. The existing single family home at 1350 Spear Street will remain. The existing structures at 1302 Spear Street will be removed. In addition, a mix of single family homes, duplex, and triplex buildings are proposed. A total of 47 new dwelling units will be constructed, in addition to the existing single family home to remain. Home Design Guidelines have been developed to insure compliance with the residential design requirements of Article 9.08(C) of the Land Development Regulations (LDR). These Guidelines include requirements that buildings facing two streets shall include architectural and site elements that address both front facades. Each dwelling unit will include a garage. Additional parking will also be available in front of the garage, in the driveway, or along one side of the street. The triplex garages will be located at the back of the buildings. Trash and recycling containers for each dwelling unit will be stored in the garages. 14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452 802.878.4450 www.LDengineering.com ♦ Innovative Solutions ♦ Quality Service The land around each home, beyond the footprint lot lines, will be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association. The Association will be responsible for maintenance of the lawns and landscaping, as well as snow removal. Each homeowner will have the limited right to use the space immediately adjacent to their home for flower beds, raised garden beds, or patio space. The southwesterly portion of the parcel will be conveyed to the City. This land will initially be public open space, but may be developed as a City park in the future. The conveyance of the land will be clear on the potential future development of this parcel as a park to meet active and passive recreational needs. The 6.80 acre parcel includes the southerly portion of the wetland that bisects the project, as well as upland area to the west. On -street parking spaces are proposed along Vale Drive, with a 10 feet wide gravel path providing access across the wetland. Using a base residential density of 1.2 units per acre, the project parcel yields a density of 31 dwelling units (25.93 acres x 1.2 dwelling units/acre). LDR Section 9.05 provides for an average density of 4 dwelling units per acre, and a maximum of 4 dwelling units per structure in the SEQ-NR. The average development density for the project parcel is 103 dwelling units (25.93 acres x 4 dwelling units/acre). The transfer of development rights is proposed achieve the proposed density of 48 units. An option for the purchase of development rights from the Leduc property is attached. In compliance with the Official Map, the project will extend Vale Drive from the existing cul-de- sac to the northerly boundary of the parcel. The project will also construct a 10 feet wide paved path along the easterly project boundary, from the Vale Drive cul-de-sac to the northerly boundary of the parcel. As discussed at sketch plan review, the paved path will meander along the tree line at the easterly boundary. A few mature trees will need to be removed near unit 13, as well as west of unit 21. Trimming will be needed to create and maintain a zone clear to the side and above the paved path. The applicant will be requesting credit for construction of the paved path under the Recreation Impact Fee ordinance. Vale Drive and Spear Meadow Road are proposed to be public streets. The northernmost segment of Vale Drive, north of Spear Meadow Road, will be privately maintained until Vale Drive is extended further north in the future. Similarly, Street `A' will be privately maintained until extended further south in the future. A private drive is proposed to serve the three triplex buildings. In accordance with Article 15, the following waivers are requested: - Reduction of the minimum lot size, coverage, and setbacks to allow footprint lots - Reduction of the front yard setback to 10 feet, provided that garages are setback a minimum of 25 feet. - Reduction of the rear yard setback to 20 feet for new interior lot lines - Calculation of the building coverage and lot coverage on a project parcel basis to allow clustering of homes on smaller parcels. Construction of the project will begin with Spear Meadow Road at Spear Street. Infrastructure and home construction will proceed easterly from Spear Street to Vale Drive in Phase 1. Phase 2 will be infrastructure and home construction along Vale Drive from north to south. Phase 3 will } be the construction of the private drive and triplex buildings. There will likely be overlap in home construction between phases so that a variety of home products can be offered for sale. Construction traffic will be directed to use the Spear Street / Spear Meadow Road intersection throughout all phases. The following are enclosed for your review: - Application for Subdivision Plat Review - $4038 application fee - Location map - Home Design Guidelines - Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost - Wetland Evaluation - Stormwater Narrative - Traffic Impact Assessment - Option for purchase of development rights - 3 full size and one 11 "x 17" copy of the plans Please contact our office with any questions. Sincerel Andrew owe P.E. c: Chris Snyder Gary Farrell /`r►�. ,�. Spear ,..eadow cT V ERMONT Vermont Agency of Natural Resources %TRMiNT hlonq�elier 5 Concold NF'�t' Albany H.- .iF+H1Ri Parcels (where available) Town Boundary vermont.gov 1: 5,000 June 10, 2016 s DISCLAIMER: This map is for general reference only. Data layers that 254.0 0 127.00 254.0 Meters appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. ANR and the State of Vermont make no representations of WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere ill= 417 Ft. 1cm = 50 Meters any kind, including but not limited to, the warranties of merchantability, © Vermont Agency of Natural Resources THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION or fitness for a particular use, nor are any such warranties to be i— i—i ...ith ra —t to the Plata — thic man HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Spear Meadow Subdivision OBJECTIVES: In order to promote a rich and interesting neighborhood, Snyder Homes adopts the following design guidelines governing the design of homes within the subdivision. REQUIRED DESIGN ELEMENTS: Homes in the Spear Meadow Subdivision must comply with requirements found in the City of South Burlington, Land Development Regulations, Effective: April 11, 2016, Article 9.08, Section C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages andlor parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets; see Section 9.11). A minimum of thirty-five percent (35%) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented south. Garages should be located on the northerly side building, allowing southerly orientation of the living space for optimization of solar gain. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. Buildings may have more than one facade that face an immediately adjacent street. In these cases, each fagade shall be designed as a front facade with architectural and/or site elements that are oriented to the street. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings should be set back ten feet (10') from the street right of way (b) Garages shall be set back twenty five feet (25') from the back of the sidewalk (c) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages where the vehicle entrance is parallel to the front building line of a house, the front building line of the garage must be set behind that front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet (8'). The portion of the building nearest the front line may be a covered, usable porch, so long as the porch is no less than 8 feet wide. The building width of a single or two family dwelling, not including the garage, shall be no less than 12 feet. For a duplex with side by side primary entries, the building width of each unit in the duplex, not including the garage, shall be no less than 8 feet. The DRB may waive this provision for garages with the vehicle entries facing a side yard, provided that (i) the garage is visually integrated into the main house and (ii) the front building line of the garage is no more than eight feet (8') in front of the front building line of the house. Rear alleys are encouraged for small lot single-family houses, duplexes and townhouses. (5) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.) sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street within neighborhoods rather that compartmentalized into sections of near - identical units. DESIGN CONSTRAINTS: Potential homeowners in the Spear Meadows Subdivision are encouraged to be creative and a wide variety of styles, colors and forms will be allowed. In addition to the minimum legal requirements, the following limits apply: 1. Any given Home Model can be varied by mirroring the plan, changing the color scheme, revising the placement or orientation of the garage, changing the palate of materials or modifying the roof lines. 2. Identical Models (without the variations noted above) may not be constructed on adjoining lots, or facing one another across the street. A given model must change any two of the five variables to be determined sufficiently different. 3. A home's color palate is comprised of its primary siding color, accent siding color, roofing color, trim color and colored accents such as shutters or door and window frames. An identical color palate may not be repeated on adjoining home sites, without regard to Model. No single color palate shall be repeated more than 3 times in the subdivision without variation of one or more of these color variables. 4. Snyder Homes reserves the right to disallow a proposed design if they determine that it fails to comply with the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, these design control standards or the overall design intent of the subdivision. 5. Prior to Construction, house plans shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Staff of the City of South Burlington for determination that the proposed home complies with Article 9, Section C of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, and these design control standards. 6. Snyder Homes shall maintain a color coded copy of the subdivision plat that shows the Home Model, Color Scheme and any Variations proposed for each lot as they develop. An 11x17 inch color copy of the map shall be included with each home permit application for use by the zoning administrator in checking compliance with these requirements. 7. The decision of the Administrative Officer may be appealed to the Development Review Board within fifteen days (15) of the date the Director's or Administrative Officer's decision is reported to the Development Review Board. Notice of an appeal shall comply with the provisions of 24 VSA, Section 4465. The Development Review Board shall review an appeal in accordance with the standards and procedures applicable to the type of review in question. Spear Meadows Landscape Estimate of Probable Cost June 2016 Foundation Plantings Item --F Size Unit Cost* FQuantity Subtotal Foundation Plantings (see plan for species options) Deciduous shrubs #3 $50 18 $900 _ Evergreen shrubs #3 $50 12 $600 Total cost per dwelling unit: $1,500 47 dwelling units x $1,500 / unit = $70,500 Trees on Common Land Item Size Unit Cost" Quantity Subtotal [Trees Prunus sargentii Quercus robar'Skymaster' Sargent Cherry 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 7 $4,200 Skymaster English Oak 2 1/2" - 3" Cal $600 14 $8,400 Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 4'-6' height $200 22 $4,400 Picea glauca White Spruce 4'-6' height $200 21 $4,200 Pinus strobus White Pine 5'-6' height $200 37 $7,400 Tilia americana American Basswood 2 - 2 1/2" Cal $475 6 $2,850 Thuja occidentalis 'Nigra' lNorthern White Cedar 4'-6' height $125 44 $5,500 Total Common Land Trees: $36,950 TOTAL ALL LANDSCAPING $107,450 Proposed construction costs 18 SF homes @ $200,000 $3,600,000 20 duplex units @ $175,000 $3,500,000 9 triplex units @ $150,000 $1,350,000 Site work $1,500,000 TOTAL $9,950,000 Re_ wired Landscaping Value $ 250,000 @ 3% $7,500 $ 250,000 @ 2% $5,000 $ 9,450,000 @ 1% $94,500 TOTAL $107,000 Gilman & Briggs Environmental, I nc. 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, Vermont 05641 Tel: (802) 479-7480; FAX: (802) 476-7018 2benviron menta1Aea rth I ink. net The wetland complex at the site of the proposed Spear Meadows subdivision off Spear Street in South Burlington lies in a shallow depression between residential development along Spear Street on the west and open fields to the east. It is shown on the Vermont Significant Wetlands Inventory, and is therefore a Class II Wetland protected under provisions of the Vermont Wetland Rules. The wetland occupies an area mapped as poorly drained Covington silty clay and is dominated by reed canary -grass (Phalaris arundinacea); it would be classified as an seasonally saturated emergent (PEME) wetland. It drains to the north along a man-made ditch bordered by wetland shrubs and small trees. The wetland in May 2016 using the methodology found in the 1987 Army Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and 2009 Regional Supplement, as required by the Vermont Wetland Rules. Data from a transect established between Flags C-1 and C-2 (near the proposed access connection between Spear Meadows and the existing Pinnacle at Spear development) is shown on the attached Wetland Determination Data Forms. The subject wetland performs the following two functions protected under the Wetland Rules: 5.1. Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff. While limited, there is storage capacity in the wetland, and flows are impeded, draining out slowly after storm events. 5.2 Surface and Ground Water Protection The wetland receives and treats runoff from adjacent uplands as runoff travels through areas of dense herbaceous growth. The subject wetland does not perform (or performs at a less -than -significant level) the following functions: 5.3 Fish Habitat. No open water. 5.4 Wildlife Habitat. Minimal habitat diversity; the wetland likely supports a few aquatic species, but not at a significant level. 5.5 Exemplary Wetland Natural Community. This is a common wetland type. 5.6 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species. No such species were noted. 5.7 Education and Research in Natural Sciences. Not applicable. 5.8 Recreational Value and Economic Benefits. Not applicable. 5.9 Open Space and Aesthetics. While the wetland can be seen from a few public vantage points, it appears more as a field than a wetland 5.10 Erosion Control through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil. There are no erosive forces. Errol C. Briggs, Gilman & Briggs Environmental, Inc. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Spear Meadows City/County: South Burlington/Chittende Sampling Date: 23 MAY 16 Applicant/Owner: Snyder Homes State: YT Sampling Point: WET C1/2 Investigator(s): Errol C. Briggs Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): None Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR R Lat: 44.43640 _ Long:-73.18668 Datum: DD Soil Map Unit Name: Vergennes Clay NWI classification: PEMD Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No Soil No or Hydrology NO significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation No , Soil No or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X_ No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) X Drainage Patterns (610) X High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) X Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (61) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) X Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 17 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WET C1/2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. None Number of Dominant Species 3 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% 6. 7. Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,..Viburnum recognitum ) 5 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. _ Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Phalaris arundinaceas 30 70 2, Scirpus cyperinus 20 3. Symphyotrichum lanceolatum 10 4, Solidago gigantea 10 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover FAC (A) (B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% r X _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' FACW - 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) OBL Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) FACW FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub -Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. 100+ = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. None 2. 3. Hydrophytic 4 Vegetation Present? = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) = Total Cove Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Profile Description: needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence Sampling Point: WET C1/2 Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks 0-9 2,5Y 4/1 100 Clay 9-18 2.5Y 4/2 80 7.5YR 4/3 20 Clay 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, MLRA 14913) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 1496) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) __ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) _ Red Parent Material (1721) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Northcentral and Northeast Region Project/Site: Spear Meadows City/County: South Burlington/Chittende Sampling Date: 23 MAY 16 Applicant/Owner: Snyder Homes State: VT Sampling Point: UPL C1/2 Investigator(s): Errol C. Briggs Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): None Local relief (concave, convex, none): None _ Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR R Lat: 44.43640 Long:-73.18668 Datum: DID Soil Map Unit Name: Vergennes Clay NWI classification: N/A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No Soil No or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No Are Vegetation No Soil No or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Drainage Patterns (610) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Saturation (A3) _ Marl Deposits (B15) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Version 2.0 VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Spiraea latifolia 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Bromus Inermis 2, Solidago canadensis 3. Vicia cracca 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate Sampling Point: UPL C1/2 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MultipIV bv: = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = FACW species 30 x 2 = 60 30 X FACW FAC species x 3 = FACU species 80 x 4 = 320 UPL species _ x 5 = - Column Totals: 110 (A) 380 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 29% Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 30 = Total Cover - 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 80 X FACU - data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Trace FACU Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Trace UPL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/shrub -Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vines - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 80+ = Total Cover height. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: UPL C1/2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 3/2 100 Clay 9-18 10YR 4/2 100 Clay 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histosol (Al) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, _ Histic Epipedon (A2) MLRA 14913) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 1496) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) _ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 1496) _ Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region — Version 2.0 Stormwater Narrative Spear Meadow June 2016 Existing Conditions The project parcel is 25.93 acres, consisting of three lots under the same ownership. The parcel is bounded by Spear Street and single family home lots to the west, single family home lots to the east, open space and a vacant residential lot off the Vale Drive cul-de-sac to the south, and an agricultural field to the north. A portion of the project parcel has frontage along Spear Street to the west, as well as frontage on a future right of way off the end of the Vale Drive cul-de-sac to the south. Two existing single family homes are located on the project parcel, both along the Spear Street frontage. The northerly single family home, which is currently unoccupied, will be removed with the project. The southerly single family home will remain. The westerly and southerly portions of the project parcel have been agricultural crop rotation. The easterly portion of the parcel is currently planted for hay, but has been planted with corn in recent years. The southerly portion of the parcel is not currently in use, but has been planted for hay and corn. The westernmost portion of the project parcel slopes westerly to Spear Street. The majority of the project parcel slopes to a class 2 wetland that flows south to north, bisecting the parcel. The project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. The soils on the project parcel are predominantly clay. The mapped soil units include Livingston clay, Vergennes clay, and Covington clay, which are all in hydrologic soil group D. Slopes generally range from 0-8%. Existing impervious surface on the project parcel is associated with the single family homes. There is a total of 1/3 acre of existing impervious surface on the project parcel. Stormwater Permitting The project parcel is not currently subject to any prior State stormwater permits. A State stormwater permit will be required for the creation of greater than 1 acre of new impervious surface. The project will require an Individual Permit, since it is within the Potash Brook watershed. The proposed stormwater management system will comply with the 2002 Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards. This project is also subject to Article 12 of the Land Development Regulations. Section 12.03 includes water quality and channel protection volume treatment standards. In addition, stormwater modelling for this site has been provided for the 25 year design storm to address Section 12.03(E). The project will also require coverage under the Vermont Construction General Permit for erosion prevention and sediment control during construction. Proposed Conditions The project has been designed to comply with the 2002 Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards (STS), and the South Burlington Low Impact Development Guidance Manual (SBLID). The following summarizes compliance with the various design and treatment standards. Page 1 of 3 SKID Conservation design practices — Cluster development The project includes both single family, duplex, and triplex buildings. Each home will be constructed on a footprint lot, with limited surrounding common space that will be maintained as lawn. The project also involves the transfer of development rights, increasing the density of housing on the project parcel, but preserving other land within the Southeast Quadrant as perpetual open space. SKID Conservation design practices — Minimize pavement widths The proposed street width is 26 feet along the front of the homes on Vale Drive and Spear Meadow Road, in compliance with Table 9-2 of the Land Development Regulations. Private streets without onstreet parking are 24 feet wide. At wetland crossings, the proposed road width is 18 feet. SKID Conservation design practices — Minimize setbacks and frontages The site layout minimizes front yard setbacks, which also limits driveway lengths and the overall footprint of development. Driveway lengths have been designed to accommodate one car length between the back of the proposed sidewalk and the garage. Front yard setbacks are further reduced where garages are located at the rear or side of the building. All duplex and triplex buildings share driveways. Sideyard setbacks have also been minimized to allow a compact, clustered development footprint. SBLID Conservation design practices — Open space preservation The southwest corner of the project parcel will remain as public open space. This 6.80 acre block includes a segment of the class 2 wetland that bisects the site, as well as upland space for a potential future City park. SKID Conservation design practices — Shared driveway All duplex and triplex buildings will share driveways. SBLID Filtration practices —Vegetated buffer The majority of the class 2 wetland buffers on the site are currently managed areas. The current agricultural use extends to the edge of the wetland along much of the easterly portion of the project parcel. The project will allow the wetland buffers to become revegetated through natural succession. The vegetated wetland buffer will filter stormwater runoff from rooftops, and also provide aesthetic and habitat benefits. The edge of the wetland buffer will be delineated to avoid encroachment by homeowners. See the Landscape Plan for the proposed methods of delineation. SKID Infiltration practices — Disconnection of impervious area Note that the development area is mapped as Livingston clay, Vegennes clay, and Covington clay. These hydrologic group D soils limit the potential for infiltration practices on the project parcel. The majority of the rooftops will be disconnected. Rooftop gutters will be directed onto the lawns to promote filtration and infiltration. The grading of the site will direct some rooftop runoff toward the vegetated buffers along the wetland that bisects the project parcel. SKID Landscaping practices The majority of the project parcel is open meadow or agricultural fields with rotating crops. Although the land will be developed for residential use, the density of the site vegetation will be Page 2 of 3 improved for much of the parcel. Trees will be planted at 30 feet on center along the public and private streets. Trees will also be planted along the rear of many of the homes. Foundation plantings consisting of a mix of trees, shrubs, and perennials will placed around each of the new buildings (see Landscape Plan). STS - Water quality volume treatment standard (WQv) Note that the development area is mapped as Livingston clay, Vegennes clay, and Covington clay. These hydrologic group D soils limit the potential for infiltration practices on the project parcel. Pond east Runoff from the majority of the easterly portion of the development area will be conveyed to a stormwater pond at the north end of Vale Drive (pond east). Runoff will flow overland across vegetated terrain to the catchbasin and pipe system flowing northerly along Vale Drive. The water quality volume treatment standard will be met by providing extended detention in the stormwater pond. A forebay is provided at the inlet pipes to remove coarse sediment. The permanent pool of the stormwater pond exceeds 50% of the water quality volume. Pond east Runoff from the majority of the westerly portion of the development area will be conveyed to a stormwater pond located north of Spear Meadow Road, behind units 42-47. Runoff will flow overland across vegetated terrain to the catchbasin and pipe system along the street. The water quality volume treatment standard will be met by providing extended detention in the stormwater pond. A forebay is provided at the inlet pipes to remove coarse sediment. The permanent pool of the stormwater pond exceeds 50% of the water quality volume. The water quality volume standard for a portion of the rooftop of units 22-37 is provided by utilizing the disconnection credit. Runoff from the rear portion of these rooftops will be directed through the rear yards and wetland buffer. STS — Channel protection volume treatment standard (CPv) Extended detention of collected runoff is provided in the two stormwater ponds. Each pond provides 12 hours of detention, as required for the Potash Brook watershed (cold water fish habitat) STS — Overbank flood protection treatment standard Peak flow attenuation of collected runoff is provided in the two stormwater ponds. The post development routed peak flow from each stormwater pond is less than the prevelopment peak flow for each contributing subwatershed. The additional detention provided in each pond offsets the lack of detention for the disconnected rooftop runoff and lawn areas that are not collected in the stormwater system. The stormwater ponds have been sized using both the 10 year and 25 year design storms. STS — Extreme flood protection treatment standard The extreme flood protection treatment standard (100 year design storm) has been evaluated for this project even though the total proposed impervious surface is less than 10 acres. This standard is waived for projects with less than 10 acres of new impervious surface. Peak flow attenuation of collected runoff is provided in the two stormwater ponds. The post development routed peak flow from each stormwater pond is less than the prevelopment peak flow for each contributing subwatershed. The additional detention provided in each pond offsets the lack of detention for the disconnected rooftop runoff and lawn areas that are not collected in the stormwater system. Page 3 of 3 Spear Meadow June 2016 Stormwater Modelling Data Summary Pre & Post (Routed) Peak Discharge 10 Year Q (cfs) 25 year Q (cfs) 100 year Q (cfs) Subwatershed Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post East 16.98 7.34 25.82 13.24 39.96 32.74 West 6.50 1.78 9.48 4.91 14.17 11.89 Mid 9.55 9.95 14.25 14.67 21.74 22.16 Site Total 33.03 19.07 49.55 32.82 75.87 66.79 Pond East Design storm Routed Q (cfs) ea ev. (ft) Det. Time (min) Wqv 0.1 382.95 1421 Cpv 0.95 384.51 723 10 year 7.34 385.47 25 year 13.24 386.13 100 year 32.74 386.63 WQv = 19,292 CF 10% WQv = 1,929 CF 50% WQv = 9,646 CF Forebay = 4,792 CF Permanent pool* = 10,256 CF * Permanent pool includes only 10% of WQv for forebay volume Pond West Design storm Routed Q (cfs) Peak Elev. (ft) Det. Time (min) Wqv 0.02 382.81 914 Cpv 0.14 383.88 716 10 year 1.78 384.34 25 year 4.91 384.63 100 year 11.89 384.54 WQv = 5,588 CF 10% WQv = 559 CF 50% WQv = 2,794 CF Forebay = 2,665 CF Permanent pool* = 3,147 CF * Permanent pool includes only 10% of WQv for forebay volume I o I THE CONTRACTORS ALL NOTIFY 'DIGSAFE' PRIOR TO AtYV EXCAVATION r / \ J r POI EAST ...... - ,==' ! - - ° 0 -- gj I" .I _ E Y>E-, POND WEST WM B STATE \\ AGRICULTURAL COLLEOE Q 1 1510➢1280 -- i /rr 4� —Elf t'� ri;+'X NEW —E� LOCATION PLAN 1 N.T.S. I .. C RE art; AIF S/N 001 POI MID o ) / \_. -. _.� I ,�+^. -'"i+ � /�_�_-(�„!-- -,^ sr Hsu ,,..e �\�r�\.� /-• "`\ P6NP: A$ �'t\ c o o POI WEST /rr,v maatx i�11 �r+t) \ / 6 � • � / � � JJ// � v�� /K 1 ✓ C _,� w 'I GO C 1 - _ 1 I` ) , � r `_ r; ///ir -�.__ -,` II /, ,/ I I / ....-�-• (\ r ,; .�. r � ter/ / % it T. ii _—L/•�� _...—�\� ,-._ I �'___...r---- —_ I I �'1lIjlIl r I r,�_--1 ,I �I 1!I!I II �1 el I 1 i GRAPHIC SCALE LEGEND mo o so 100 200 400 PROJECTBOUNDARV In IN WN IN In In In IN In PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY (in leer) ABUTTING PROPERTY LINE 1 -1, = 100ft. WATERSHED PROTECTION BUFFER v EDGE OF WETLAND TREELINE .. ... ......... ...„....—...... ...... ...... EXISTING CONTOUR ITE I ail all SOILS MAP SOILMAPPINOUNITKEY: C,-00ANGTON SILTY CLAY N T.S GeC A Ge0-GEORGIA STONY LOAM LM1 - LMNGSTON CLAY MnC-MASSENASTONYSILTLOAM VsB - VERGENNES CLAY THESE PLANS WITH LATEST REVISIONS SHOULD / OF ONLY BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW: SHEETS E-1 SKETCH/CONCEPT PRELIMINARY Ej FINAL 0 RECORD DRAWING P.a1 na. SPEAR MEADOWS 14006 Yey A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT L&D SPEAR STREET & VALE DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON design ABR OVERALL drawn ABR STORMWATER chac ked DJG DRAINAGE PLAN cat 06Q06-16 LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON tale AS NOTED Consulting Engineers, Inc 14 Morse Drive sNL n O' Essex lunctioq VT05452 Tel: 802-B78-0450 LAMOUREUX Et DICKINSON 14 Morse Drive, Essex Junction, VT 05452 LD Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tel. (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 Andy@LDengineering.com • Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Soils • Wetlands • Landscape Architecture • TRANSMITTAL ❑ Mail ❑ Fax ® Hand carried ❑ To be picked up ❑ Courier service TO: Ray Belair FROM: Andrew Rowe ADDRESS: City of South Burlington PBtZ DATE: January 13, 2016 FAX NO: RE: PROJECT NAME: Spear Meadows PROJECT #: 14008 COPIES DATE SHEET DESCRIPTION ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Plans Shop Drawings Report Copy of Letter Change Order Specifications 3 01-12-16 1 Sketch Plan (full size) 1 01-12-16 1 Sketch Plan (11x17) COMMENTS: IV ❑ Disk )AN 13 2V ® For your review city Of So. w "° ❑ For your use ❑ For comment ❑ As requested ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ For execution Signature: Andrew Rowe COPY TO: TOTAL PAGES: (Including cover page) ❑ Front Office Copy ❑ Project File Copy Revised: 4/14/11 P:\L8D Library\Office Forms\transmittal 2011 - word C. l—I I \\�Shnd et,al-- ASTRONOMIC 10670�01226 _ � � 10'WIDEPAVEDPATH M. and M. SC011ins I }\�,� KI6n TYPICAL3UNITf 1160-00214 \> > 11 ) .and L�_// SOWNHOU4k---- GRAPHIC SCALE - _ W o w W iza zao 10' PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' / / I i „- _ 5' WIDE SIDEWALK Pinnacle a Spaat ce g g WIDE EASEMENT TO AVOID MATURE TREES ' �'0°' \ ,- -, _ - - - ear _ _ aao SINGLE FAMILY HOME`. 18' ' _ ON FOOTPRINT LOT - _ -- - -, - - - - - - AL P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - _—_ y_.��, _ 21 10 11 ` - t - DRIVE - 9 �o - _ - I 14 `�19 I 5 ` - _ arks Partners hip\ _ L 'n/Milot Partn J I' O 1742-00033 60' ROW FOR POTENTIAL - - - FUTURE STREET EXTENSION- PUBLIC STREET - - • 26, o / � O - VALE DR.NE TSTREET PRIC _ - - m ^ogHua ©7 -- F rn c� O WATik� ' ` - ®` v — b STORM oco 32 i - 30 _ �: y1 33 I + �7nPrm �'!^ S IlO Qp.' oE1�aN N.,Dy iington Op TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I \, -' WETLANDS DELINEATED BY I -- :~ -- . t• , . • - • ,' .' ' -1. WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS ' pear Meadows, Inc. -4 y EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT 18 1640-1340 . PATH AND BOARDWALK (ACROSS WETLAND) TO \ \' OPEN SPACE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 18 UNITS - U — — -- . DUPLEX HOMES � C •1—.. ems- ' 35 (TOWNHOUSE & FLATS) 20 UNITS OIREN- 6E- TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES 9 UNITS 1�- _ /T 0 PUBLIC (PARK 7.0 ACRES TOTAL I TOTAL PUD = 48 UNITS 7PICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE so' PRNATE STvE�T (4.3 ACRES UPLAND)/ i OPEN SPACE ' I , 80' ROW FOR POTENTIAL I PINNACLE AT SPEAR I FUTURE STREET EXTENSION 38 1 f'__ _41 45 it ./ - �i / W. and M. Gilbert ® s 1640-01400 �az / K. SAWTELLE I I Q /r _17 1640-013C0 - .1.,_ LOTI / •''_ �i �`\ \ Q 4E26•p MITE BIT SPEAR 1350 LLC , ,' �` T I ,,''• �._ - / ' 1 TIC r �• ( CON C- ROAD 1/ / I '! / �(i. Fa II �' ; CONCRETE CURB lsao-o13so ,� ,' 1 I v1f t i �� 1 ® / Q I \ ' 40- 13 it�� J • _ �� I� i / / r L •���\ `�� \� � '� I 1 I / ` ® 11 i ...' � i,/l l/ � I I I I z � I--� // I `�4'`�� I 1 �'-- o L. and D. Youn9l M. Dencker -- Muhr 0 ' I\ • Q- .� \ ` . e G.6nd,,/ Fane#1/ 1640-01j402 I I j j • • r �.1_\� ^. -1640J01430` Ea ,, , Rand T. J 'Volume 142, Paj4*-4&-4T / I I I C. and B. I®\ \ Z t2.sacres --.•-��,!' , I �� arrant I Marro uin 1,640-01404 ' �• and C. Franzoni 1640-0 2s6 " ,, _ i i I i I �i 1640-01406 I 1-7�.� SPEAR MEADOWS II coNsmuc,ED I ' ' ' ' ' R. and T. AvondaADTCTURAL D7CN �,�'' \ �`� I i ' I /I�, 1640-01317 R SKETCH PLAN R. and E. Lawgne _ sTRE� , ` \ - - j ; I ; I ; I JAN UARY 12, 2016 C. Shand at aI . i 0570-01225 _ - 1V WIDE PAVED PATH / M. and M. SDollins I TYPICAL 3 UNIr� T. and L. Kish tt6D-0021a ,- - TOWNHOUSE B O e -- 1160-002f9 gym' GRAPHIC SCALE - ; - - - Open Space ,m :a 19 PAVED PATH TO MEANDER WITHIN 20' 1 , - - B WIDE SIDEWALK _ _ r - - - air,"cle at sspp-, {� - WIDE EASEMENT TOAVOIDMATURE TREES G --- --- �- - e _ SINGLE FAMILY HOME�x _ � �� l,J [ � - IV .. ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowskand _J. L. bilbt 1g4e 000s9 • D IVE - - LarldnlAplot Partnership (11 2 �� 1742-geD33 > ) ®: 90' ROW FOR POTENTIAL - 1 FUTURE STREET EXTENSION ' '. g PUBLIC sT�� I - — — -L VALE DWVE - -' a—o WATER � II 1 O ' " ecnAias 1 OPE TYPICAL DUPLEX FLAT I �:. KY -ANDS DEUNE-D BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNRS N t 1 � pear Meadows f ` w Au D. ca Nmw.N , EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT 1640-13a0 PATH AND BOARDWALK- _ -i (ACROSS WETLAND) TO OPEN SPACE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 1S UNITS DUPLEX HOMES �_ - - OPEN — (TOWNHOUSE 6 FLATS) 20 UN ITSSPACE ® _ TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES •UNITE I� TYPICAL DUPLEX TOWNHOUSE TOTAL NEW a uNrrs ( a2 5wa PyyA� ST�� T+� OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE 4.3 ACRES NY ROW FOR POTENTIAL PINNACLE AT SPEAR FUTURE STREET EXTENSION l 26 / W. and M. GEmIt t i K. SAWTELLE I Q • _ few-014OG t ` _ , LOT 1 s _ _ - :L 4, ` 1350 SPEAR LL -7 • - 1 �. 1 � �If �a m�' 1640-01350 ,� j I l � I � �� • � ' l -- I j I ; - D. Muhr�-- o \'� O • O-. \ >& 1r9� G. enc!J. FaneN. i/ , 1'Ydume-29 and D. *4 Ung L - —J i -` i 1e4a-m14� I jll and T. I I • 1� 642 bf4os I M. Dencker � ��`�� � '1640-01430-� //� sum --�-.,^R ice' I �BRard I "ram •+- C. and B. Mammukl'� - �r I 1 I I i�0-mow .and C. Fremmnl 1` �' ` 7 i 1640-01295 1 R. and I ----`�+\ " Yam- II SPEAR MEADOWS SKETCH PLAN 0T.- 1317 1840-013/7 I R. and E. Lavigne _ -- _ \ �' �i�-�� gT/� �L�� � � � _ I I I ; ' I 11 ' I ' I I I ' ' ' I' DECEMBER 28, 2015 zzx""� Si�yder Homes ' —Your Builder of Choice January 6, 2016 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow (SD-14-37) Sketch Plan review Dear Ray: I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows project. The following summarizes the changes between the sketch plan reviewed by the DRB on December 15 and the enclosed sketch plan (dated 12-28-15): - The total number of units has been reduced from 50 to 47 new units. Homes are proposed in a mix of single family, duplex, and triplex buildings. 4.3 acres of upland open space is proposed at the southwest corner of the project parcel. The Spear Meadow open space is contiguous with the open space of the Pinnacle at Spear neighborhood to the south. The proposed Spear Meadow open space is over 400% of the minimum required area. The Spear Meadow open space will be available for community gardens, footpaths, and passive enjoyment of the outdoors. Although it is envisioned that most users will walk, four on -street parallel parking spaces are proposed on Vale Drive for public access to the open space. - Three triplex buildings are proposed at the southeast corner of the project parcel. Landscaping and/or fencing will be used to delineate and separate this driveway from the bike path. The primary entrance to each of these homes will face Vale Drive, with separate walkways connecting to the sidewalk along Vale Drive. The driveway serving the triplex homes will create a T-intersection with Vale Drive. The curvilinear alignment of Vale Drive will result in variation of the proposed streetscape. In addition, bump -outs and a crosswalk are proposed adjacent to Units 8 & 9. - Units 8 & 9 were adjusted to achieve 47 feet of separation to accommodate the sidewalk connection between Vale Drive and the bike path. The layout of these two homes, including the positioning of the garages, will also account for the proposed sidewalk. 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax CEE N T E R NAHB snyderhomesvt.com CERTIFIED - The 10' Paved bike path is located along the property line, however, we have planned for a 20' easement so that the path can meander around trees. - Although the land around each home will be owned in common, each homeowner will have semi -private space available near their unit. This space may be used for private amenities such as raised gardening beds, grilling, or a patio set. - A right of way is proposed along the street serving units 34-41 for it's potential future extension south to the Gilbert property. Eight homes, a mix of single family and duplex buildings, are proposed on this street. - A mix of single family and duplex buildings are proposed along the west side of Vale Drive and the north side of Spear Meadow Road. These homes replace the triplex buildings previously proposed in these areas. - The layout of units 32/33 will be designed so that primary entries face the street. Units 46/47 will also be similarly designed to be oriented toward the street. These changes were made in response to comments from the DRB, staff, and neighbors. I look forward to reviewing the sketch plan with the Development Review Board on January 19th Please contact me with any questions. 4Sin ere C 's Snyder Mr. Dinklage explained the history of Southeast Quadrant zoning. He showed the area that is to be left open as two significant wildlife corridors. This includes a lot of privately owned land which lost the ability to develop on that land. In exchange, the -city gave these land owners the right to develop those units elsewhere in the Southeast Quadrant via the TDR process. The property in question is one of those "receiving areas." Mr. Farrell said he had no new information for the Board. The Board then reviewed a list of items needing DRB concurrence, as follows: A. allowing a cul de sac and concurring on its length iv.0 lliliiliage no eU U.1 �it,y will probably wain a right -of way to the property line. He also noted that the proposed length of the cul de sac is 700 feet to the circle. Mr. Belair said the recommended maximum length is 200 feet. Mr. Stuono said he does not favor the cul de sac but feels the land should remain open since it is adjacent to an NRP area. He showed the area he felt should remain open. Mr. Knudsen said the reason for the short cul de sac requirement is to allow for "neighborhoods," and 700 feet doesn't do that. He indicated he would not want a 700 foot cul de sac. Mr. Dinklage noted there will be a connection to the Gilbert property which will make that a shorter cul de sac. Mr. Farley said he was comfortable with the request. Ms. Quimby said she agrees with. Mr. Knudsen. Mr. Gilbert said he does not want that connection and he doesn't want the 700-foot road. Mr. Dinklage noted there was not a majority of the Board in favor of the cul de sac, but two Board members are not present. B. Provide for on -street parking Members were OK with this. C. Allow on -street parking for the park vs. created spaces at the park Members favored on -street parking. D. Conflicts with Land Development Regulations: It was noted that the regulations require that primary entries for single and multi -family buildings must face the street. Y %Y %Y HT. STONE COLUMN BOTH WOES OF ROAO.IABEL BOTH SIDES OF STONE) _ —\_ H-2 395 J10 390 E — — \ 393 390 t" \ - .. ®.- •. / / 4 PORCH SETBACK m / _\_ _-_--�' �..• r - _ I Is FROM R.(.W.) C BUILDING SETBACK F \ _ ,10'FROIA / ' RECREATION -' / , _ 1I / •s,PNTH EASEMENT E \ i 60.FOOTRIGHT-OF AY $ � _ — F � F FOR FUTURE CONNECTION \ _ I - TO NORTHERN PARCEL 1 \ \ _ — — \ \ A.2 -� — / • M . `•!. — � pen Space / - 384 - — — — '\ / / PROPOSED USE: - - / I _ — _ _ �• �: i _ • Pinnacle at Spear e 92 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS I ff i — — 1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT (EXISTING) /� �E 3� / ( / REQUIRED PARKING: I1 ® ��/- 2.25 SPACES PER UNIT — �` ®�] 't y / 207 TOTAL REQUIRED SPACES 2 �;fi n C. and C. Hager r s G 4 2 ! Volume 391, u� � � �� _ \ Of Pages 285-288— / ygb� PROPOSED PARKING: \ t0.9 acres C xc // — _ 120 GARAGE SPACES 36 REAR DRIVEWAY SPACES 71 ON -STREET SPACES � \\ ` �s+— h 1 , 227 TOTAL SPACES 1 ► 2.46 SPACES PER UNIT I \� / NOTE: REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING Z:7\ \\ \ 1 DOES NOT INCLUDE EXITING RESIDENCE 17 \ \ I ® / SINGLE-FAMRY GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) go. . n P:\Active Vwv \ 9 S3 I I I I �390= Applicant: Eric Farrell landscape architects .planning consultants lbo O6 1:�-t )09 _ 4 BO B gf n, VT 05402 301 college street • budinglon • vennont • 05401 802 •558 •-' : �awm n � _: y - _ - - - -- 1 Spear e ;,,a_ 5 wg, 5: 9 o e 4x .pc — --- - — �f low a a2%74�; & W , A - foil OFA NO I T. J. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SD_14_37_1302_1340_1350Spea rStreet_Spea rMeadows_ sketch_Dec_15_2015_mtg Owner Spear Meadows, Inc Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: December 11, 2015 Plans received: November 17, 2015 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear Street Sketch Plan Application #SD-14-37 Meeting date: December 15, 2015 Applicant Chris Snyder Snyder Homes 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Engineer Property Information Plans not stamped by an Engineer Tax Parcel 1640-01302; Tax Parcel 1640-01340 Tax Parcel 1640-01350 SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 25.91 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PROJECT DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Sketch plan review application #SD-14-37 of Snyder Homes for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 14 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 12 3-unit multi -family dwellings totaling 50 new units, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. The above description has been revised from the original request to reflect the current proposal. Proposed development in this area has been discussed in depth at multiple prior DRB meetings in connection with applications #SD-11-51 and #MP-11-03. The proposal has a new applicant under this Sketch Plan, however. COMMENTS The staff notes herein reflect a review of the major topics and are, at this stage, intended to review the basic concept and site design, as well as to advise the applicant as to any potential problems and concerns relating to those major issues. For the purposes of a focused sketch plan discussion, staff has tried to narrow the discussions to the central issues that seem to present themselves at this early stage of the project. Additional items, including but not limited to the specific requirements for landscaping, traffic and other issues certainly warrant a full review and will be addressed in detail at a later stage. Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the revised plans submitted on September 16, 2015 and a revised plan submitted on November 17, 2015 and offer the following comments. Issues for discussion Development on dead-end roads 9.08 SEQ-NRT and SEQ-NR Sub -Districts; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub -districts have additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, block and lot pattern. (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 500 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1.2.5 to 1:5 recommended. Development in southwest portion of property In the past the Board has seen various proposals for development of the SW corner of the property. One version showed a public street to serve a large park, another showed a private road serving three (3) homes with a centralized park elsewhere in the development and the version discussed on October 6, 2015 proposed a road to serve two (2) large home lots and a park. The current November 17, 2015 proposal consists of a private drive serving nine (9) housing units in three (3) triplex buildings. The length of this private drive at almost 800 feet in length is not consistent with section (A)(2)(b) which states that "(d)ead end streets (e.g. culs-de-sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length." At a prior DRB meeting held on November 17, 2009, the DRB reviewed a plan submitted on Sept. 3, 2009 wherein development in the SW corner of the property consisted of a 700 ft. long cul-de- sac road with seven (7) triplexes. An excerpt of the minutes reads as follows: 4. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-09-42 of Gary Farrell et al for a planned unit development on a 26.1 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings. The proposal consists of: 1) razing one single family dwelling, 2) constructing 13 two-family dwelling, and 3) constructing 22 three -unit multi family dwellings, 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street: Mr. Dinklage explained the history of Southeast Quadrant zoning. He showed the area that is to be left open as two significant wildlife corridors. This includes a lot of privately owned land which lost the ability to develop on that land. In exchange, the city gave these land owners the right to develop those units elsewhere in the Southeast Quadrant via the TDR process. The property in question is one of those "receiving areas." Mr. Farrell said he had no new information for the Board. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The Board then reviewed a list of items needing DRB concurrence, as follows: A. allowing a cul de sac and concurring on its length DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Mr. Dinklage noted the city will probably want a right-of-way to the property line. He also noted that the proposed length of the cul de sac is 700 feet to the circle. Mr. Belair said the recommended maximum length is 200 feet. Mr. Stuono said he does not favor the cul de sac but feels the land should remain open since it is adjacent to an NRP area. He showed the area he felt should remain open. Mr. Knudsen said the reason for the short cul de sac requirement is to allow for "neighborhoods," and 700 feet doesn't do that. He indicated he would not want a 700 foot cul de sac. Mr. Dinklage noted there will be a connection to the Gilbert property which will make that a shorter cul de sac. Mr. Farley said he was comfortable with the request. Ms. Quimby said she agrees with Mr. Knudsen. Mr. Gilbert said he does not want that connection and he doesn't want the 700 foot road. Mr. Dinklage noted there was not a majority of the Board in favor of the cul de sac, but two Board members are not present. Given this prior discussion and the language in section (A)(2)(b), the Board should first discuss whether it is a likelihood that this road serving this portion of the property could reasonably connect through to other properties to Spear Street or another road and if such a connection is desirable and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. At this time staff is not aware of any likely connections: the property to the south is association land for an adjacent development and the properties to the west are single family home lots with minimal road frontage. If the Board determines that this road could connect, then the Board should have further discussions regarding where such connections are likely. If the Board determines no, then the Board should provide guidance on what this area of the property should be used for. Development off Soear Meadow Road The proposed "private drive" serving units #27 - #35 is 320 ft. in length stopping just short of the property line shared with the Gilbert property to the south. Staff notes that this rear portion of the Gilbert property could be reasonably be developed in the future. Staff recommends that this private drive be constructed to City road standards if the Board determines that the property to the south is potentially developable. Otherwise, this is a dead end street which exceeds the 200 ft. length limit. Moreover, if the Gilbert property were later developed and there was no possible connection to the road serving units #27-#35, then the eastern end of the Gilbert property would likely have to create an access from Spear Street resulting in creation of another cul-dec sac. Staff notes that if this road is constructed as a public street the applicant could add additional units along this street. Staff recommends it be planned to be connected and that it be public in the future. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 2. The Board should discuss this "private drive" and whether it should be constructed to City road standards and include an irrevocable offer of dedication such that it could be extended into the adjacent property to serve future development. • Proposed Public Park Section 9 of the SBLDR states that "a range of parks should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation." Furthermore, "parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program" and "a neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one -quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned recreation area." The area set aside for the proposed public park is approximately 1.4 acres. The currently proposed location appears to be more centralized and accessible. This meets the minimum standard of approximately one (1) acre. 3. Staff recommends the Board discuss the proposed location of the park, as it has changed from the previously location in the southwest corner of the property discussed at the October 61h meeting. The Board should consider the proposed park in the context of the overall PUD. A few notes for consideration: o How does the park contribute to the innovation and creativity requirement of being a PUD? Other than the "neighborhood gardens" illustrated, what other amenities and features are anticipated to be constructed? 4. Staff understands that this level of review is not yet complete and these details should be largely worked out prior to any decision on the preliminary plat application. The applicant should engage in discussions with the Director of Public Works, Director of the Recreation Department and with the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee and these should continue to as the application evolves. The Director and the applicant should address the location, the overall size of the park and which facilities shall be planned for the space (i.e. - basketball courts, play structures, etc.), as well as parking needs. Block Lengths Staff notes that the proposed 820 ft. block length along single-family footprint lots, 1-14, is inconsistent with standards for the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential Subdistrict, stated as follows. 9.08 SEQ-NRT and SEQ-NR Sub -Districts; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub -districts have additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, block and lot pattern. (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 500 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid -block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. As recommend by staff at prior meeting, the applicant has added a mid -block, necked down crosswalk connection in the portion of Vale Drive near lots #8 & #9 and a sidewalk connection from that crosswalk to the recreation path along the eastern edge of the property. 5. The Board should determine if the proposed development block length which exceeds 500 ft. is unavoidable. At previous review meetings for prior versions of the project (2009- 2013), the Board found this length to be acceptable with the addition of crosswalks and traffic calming measures. 14.06 General Review Standards B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; (11) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; (iii) The lot has unique site conditions, such as a utility easement or unstable soils, that allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent to the public street; (iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be re -used and parking needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s); (u) The principal use of the lot is for public recreation; or (ui) The lot is located within the Mixed Industrial -Commercial Zoning District and meets the following criteria: Staff notes that the revised plan now shows extensive use of triplex flats and triplex town homes. With regards to the flats, parking for two (2) of the three (3) units appears to be located to the sides of the building so that the parking is partially consistent with B (2) (a) above. For the triplex townhome units, this standard does not appear to be met at all as CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING the driveways on which people would park lead directly from the street to the front facing garages of the townhomes. 6. The Board should ask the applicant to provide additional details on how it proposes to meet the parking standards. 9.08 SEQ-NRT and SEQ-NR Sub -Districts; Specific Standards A....... B...... C. Residential Design (1) Building Orientation. Residential buildings must be oriented to the street. Primary entries for single family and multi family buildings must face the street. Secondary building entries may open onto garages and/or parking areas. (Special design guidelines apply to arterial streets; see Section 9.11). A minimum of thirty-five percent (35%) of translucent windows and surfaces should be oriented to the south. (2) Building Facades. Building facades are encouraged to employ a theme and variation approach. Buildings should include common elements to appear unified, but facades should be varied from one building to the next to avoid monotony. Front porches, stoops, and balconies that create semi -private space and are oriented to the street are encouraged. (3) Front Building Setbacks. A close relationship between the building and the street is critical to the ambiance of the street environment. (a) Buildings should be set back twenty-five feet (25') from the back of sidewalk. (b) Porches, stoops, and balconies may project up to eight feet (8') into the front setbacks. (4) Placement of Garages and Parking. For garages where the vehicle entrance is parallel to the front building line of a house, the front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet. The DRB may waive this provision for garages with vehicle entries facing a side yard, provided that (i) the garage is visually integrated into the main house and (ii) the front building line of the garage is no more than eight (8) feet in front of the front building line of the house. Rear alleys are encouraged for small lot single-family houses, duplexes and townhouses. Figure 9-7. Residential Garage Placement Options CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING (5) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cope cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near -identical units. Staff notes that with the triplex flat units and with the end units of the townhomes it is unclear if the buildings are oriented toward the street. Staff also notes that the applicant will need to comply with Section 9.08 C (4) which requires that "the front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet." 7. The Board should ask the applicant to provide additional details on how the buildings will orient to the street as well comply with other elements of Section 9.08 C. • Northwesterly Parcel The plans depict a building, units #39-#41, along the western edge of the parcel. As currently shown, the building is oriented to the proposed new street, as opposed to facing Spear Street. The proposed setback of the building approximates those of abutting properties on Spear Street. All the other existing homes along Spear Street face Spear Street. 8. Staff recommends that the Board discuss this issue with the applicant and provide guidance on the orientation of the building. • Density The base density of the parcel generated by the land at 1.2 units per acre, based on 26.15 acres, is 31 units. The maximum units allowed, in accordance with Chapter 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and determined by the Neighborhood Residential sub -district under the Transferred Development Right program, are 103 units. The applicant is proposing to construct 50 new units, with one existing dwelling to be razed and one to remain, for a total of 51 units within the PUD. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Lot 1 1 unit one, existing SF home to remain Units 1-14 14 units SF home footprint lots Units 15-26 and 36-41 18 units 6 triplex flats Units 16 thru 24 18 units 6 triplex townhouses This is a proposed density of approximately 1.99 units per acre. A total of 22 transferred development rights (TDRs) would be required. The applicant has stated that they have a legal option to purchase enough development rights to build the project as proposed. In previous cases, the Board has previously required that the applicant to submit the legal documents pertaining to the options for review by the City Attorney as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Staff has also recommended that the TDRs be purchased by the applicant prior to issuance of zoning permits for any units beyond the 31 allowed by the property's inherent density. The Board did not previously raise issues with these recommendations regarding timing of transferred development rights. However, they should determine at this stage whether they shall be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval or prior to final plat approval. Staff recommends that the applicant submit legal documents pertaining to the options to purchase Transferred Development Rights (TDRs) to the City Attorney for approval, at a time determined by the Board. Staff recommends that the applicant submit all legal documents showing clear ownership and transfer of the development rights to the City Attorney for approval, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the 32"d unit. Roads and Circulation and Stormwater Given the different versions of this plan that have been discussed, staff feels that it is best for the Board to provide guidance on the outlines of the plan prior to a more detail analysis by Public Works staff. Phasing The Board should discuss phasing for the following items: • Road completion; • Road connection to Vale Drive; • Timing for construction and completion of Park; • General phasing for the order of construction of buildings; • Improvements on Spear Street and at the Spear Street intersection; Notice of Conditions There are "footprint" lots proposed around several of the units. For purposes of the LDRs, all lots CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 10 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING will be considered one lot. 10. For purposes of the LDRs, the footprint lots in this subdivision shall be considered one (1) lot within each grouping. The applicant will be required to record a "Notice of Condition" to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney prior to recording the final plat plans. • Mix of Housing Types (6) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near -identical units. Staff notes that the applicant has mixed duplexes and single family homes on both Vale Drive and the proposed private drive. The triplex building with units #16-18 does not face the street This does not comply with the residential design standards requiring that "residential buildings must be oriented to the street". 11. While most details will be addressed at preliminary and final plat, staff notes the applicant's proposal may or may not be consistent with Section 9.08 C.(5) • Agriculture The LDRs (Section 9.06 (C)) state: C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. The applicant has proposed community garden space to be located in the proposed park. Given that the layout of the PUD (especially the issue of the park location and its amenities) has not been settled, staff recommends that the issue of the location of garden space be resolved during Preliminary Plat review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant work with Staff and the Development Review Board to address the issues herein. There are several items which must still be addressed as part of a more detailed, engineered preliminary plat application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Staff notes that as the project evolves, additional questions not raised herein may be posed. Respectfully submitted, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Christopher Snyder, applicant No Text Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 12/17/14 Comments Due: January 9, 2015 Project Description/Meeting Date: Sketch plan review application #SD-14-37 of Snyder Homes for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 26 single family dwellings, 3) constructing seven (7) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing three (3) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Other Notes: Meeting date is 1/20/15 Snyder Homes L-�Your Builder of Choice November 13, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows Sketch Plan Review Dear Ray: I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows neighborhood. We have revised the overall neighborhood to address concerns presented by the Design Review Board and the neighbors. I look forward to meeting with the DRB on December 15, 2015. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Usincr Chris Snyder 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax snyderhomewt.com NAHB RESEARCH CENTER GREEN W CERTIFIED 121X,**,� Snyder Homes {—Your Builder of Choice November 13, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows Sketch Plan Review Dear Ray: I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows neighborhood. We have revised the overall neighborhood to address concerns presented by the Design Review Board and the neighbors. I look forward to meeting with the DRB on December 15, 2015, Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sinc r Chris Snyder 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 L-i 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax snyderhomesvt.com CERTIFIED Snyder Homes L" { Your Builder of Choice September 17, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Sketch Plan review — October 6, 2015 Dear Ray: I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows project. The following summarizes the changes between the August 11 sketch plan and the enclosed sketch plan: The total number of units has been increased from 49 to 53 units. This total includes the existing Farrell house at 1350 Spear Street. We are proposing a road and bike path extension to Vale Drive. The revised curvilinear alignment of the new north -south public street will provide some variation along the streetscape, as well as along the bike path. Added a sidewalk connection to the bike path at the south end of the neighborhood. Added a sidewalk connection between Vale Drive and the triplex units. Added a speed table on Vale Drive for additional speed calming The triplex units proposed at the south end of the project parcel have been added that will front on the new public street. Space for neighborhood gardens will be provided within the public park. Mixed up the duplex and carriage homes along Vale Drive These changes were made in response to comments from staff and neighbors at our previous sketch plan hearing in March. I look forward to reviewing the sketch plan with the Development Review Board. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Christopher Snyder 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax snyderhomesvt.com (k, GREEN CERTIFIED Snyder Homes L"LYour Builder of Choice September 17, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Sketch Plan review — October 6, 2015 Dear Ray: SEP 17 2015 City of So. Burlington I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows project. The following summarizes the changes between the August 11 sketch plan and the enclosed sketch plan: - The total number of units has been increased from 49 to 53 units. This total includes the existing Farrell house at 1350 Spear Street. - We are proposing a road and bike path extension to Vale Drive. - The revised curvilinear alignment of the new north -south public street will provide some variation along the streetscape, as well as along the bike path. - Added a sidewalk connection to the bike path at the south end of the neighborhood. - Added a sidewalk connection between Vale Drive and the triplex units. - Added a speed table on Vale Drive for additional speed calming - The triplex units proposed at the south end of the project parcel have been added that will front on the new public street. - Space for neighborhood gardens will be provided within the public park. - Mixed up the duplex and carriage homes along Vale Drive These changes were made in response to comments from staff and neighbors at our previous sketch plan hearing in March. I look forward to reviewing the sketch plan with the Development Review Board. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Christopher Snyder 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax snyderhomesvt.com NAHB RESEARCH CENTER GREEN CERTIFIED I C. Shand et al ASTRONOMIC I I 0570-01225 10' WIDE BIT. ® I PROPOSED 3-WAY / TYPICAL TRIPLEX CONC. REa PAIN _ BUILDING STOP INTERSECTION r GRAPHIC SCALE T. and L. Kleh - D ,D p 2.� M. and M. Scollins , 1160-00219 ~- -x / Open Space I 1160-00214 Pinnacle at Spear 3 ml•.II SINGLE FAMILY HOME I -x �- - - _Y-- - - \ PRIVATE DRIVE !- \ nom-eo A. 1 ON FOOTPRINT LOT . CON�ORECTPATH '. .. � � �/ � \ / P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot _ - - ! =—_ 1645-00089- - - ��14 D�I_E 71V E SPEED TABLE Larkl Partnership -r v n/M40t DRIVE - -------- - - ' • - r. VALE _ . -- --- - ooa0000 PPRCE - 2 _. m Oo L 4 ---- �2e• WIDE BIT. s •��i m w ST WATER AREA C CONCRETEACURB Gs� c o ORM W � ' v. `� - i'�jf / '~' '•'• ''•K14�REA•CLM SJr. ••UA Q•'•• Q I m ` TYPICAL DUPLEX Spear oaQ Inc. _ —•. �_,,..;•;:..'.:%�'•;•.;l'••�``A�'o .. 1 -/ r BUILDING�� : _,:=-• �_.. ' - Tom., �' 1 ` .v•,. �. �. •. •.• .....a-n, p. _ _ 11 1 �,'•:••'• •.DIP��rl�c •'' '•••• WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS - " i ` C WIDE BIT' _ _ _ _ _ \ �'• ••' 'h • WLLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN �--- V 1 CONa RDAD W/ EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I CONCRETE CURB •�'�' �• lip PUBLIC PARKING SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 2 UNITS — ✓ .. _ ••� TYPICAL SINGLE -� •••• .. •. FAMILY HOME 1 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 15 UNITS . (FOOTPRINT LOTS) OPEN SPAS i ' COMMUNITY GARDENS DUPLEX UNITS 26 UNITS / TRIPLEX UNITS 9 UNITS I-X —NEW24' WIDE BIT. 1 PRIVATE DRIVE CONCRETEACURB V`•1. and M. Gilbert OPEN SPACE TOTAL 53 UNITS I '-_�- s0 PINNACLE AT SPEAR 1640-01400 / / I FAMILY / LOT FAMILY II �/I y I I •I LOT ' rl I RESTRICTED AREA f / - ING BOUNDARY zON j PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK Q _ _____RECEIV K. SAWTELLE 1 II (1.9 AC.) • Q I j; - / EP 17201 00 1 �! LOT 1 I - - - - - S 1640-013 / ••-.. II '5 1350 SPEAR LLC I - / NEW C. R "DE BIT, / t pcONc. ROAD W/ / Q CONCRETE CURB 1640-01350 ! •/ / I rahl�� _ 1 /-' °.. BUf�I ty of S . •ngon I Q ;•/ // � j� I I I _ I � I . • I Ill �' i / I _..; II I .. I / I D. Muhr o ,\ � � � d ~� { ,sl ;• / / ,,,L. and D. Y ung � --� I lsao-olaoe I M. Dencker tin / / �I 1 o ` „� ? , 1640-0114p2 640 o1a3o G. ar1dJ Farce I / /, , 1�R. and T. _ ..Volume 142, Pa9ftd -47 / /i i I I I L 1 I f \� \ .. .... ' ' I Tarrant C. and B. ® ±2.9acres �. I Marroquinli I i ?sao-olaoa and C. Franzoni T ,/ /n� /' 1640-01406 1 1 j 1640-01295 I \ � , � II NEW SPEAR STREE\ ^ PAVEMENT WIDENING \ ` V\ S P VEV UCTED T011llATD„ r-�• I PEAR MEADOW �1 R. and 7. Avonda ROAD STRUCNRAL SECTON ^ \ \ sP SKETCH PLAN 1640-01317 EXISTING SMH RIM �390.Ot \ I I II I INV-385.at \ \ TR I I I I I I I and E. Lavigne I S E P T E M B E R 16, 2015 -\ � \�\�_ I I II I I I I j l P southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD-- (office use nly) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW SOUTHEAST QUADRANT All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #)1302 Spear St. - G.N. Farrell; 1340 Spear St. - Spear Meadows, Inc.; 1350 Spear St. - G. & J. Farrell. So. Burlington Vt. 05403 (802-863-5822) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #) Vol. 747, Pg. 653-656 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Chris Snyder, Snyder Homes, 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne Rd. 05482 985-5722 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) To develop site with single family & condominium units 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Chris Snyder, Snyder Homes, 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne Rd. 05482. (P) 985-5722 5a) CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS csnyderCaD_snyderhomesvt.com 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vt. 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1640-01340 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) General project description (explain what you want approval for): The proposed project involves the subdivision of three existing parcels, totaling 26.15 Acres in size, which will consist of 26 single family lots, one existing single family residence, seven triplex building and three duplex building for a total of 54 units. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com b) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Existinq two residential homes c) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Proposed 26 new single family houses (2500 so, one existing residential home (5306 s proposed 7 triplex building (7210 so and 3 duplex building (4690 sD d) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 26 hses (65000 sD, 7 triplex (50470 sD, 3 duplex (14070 sD, ex. house (5306 sD. Total 134846 e) Proposed height of building (if applicable) NA f) Total parcel size(s) 26.15 acres g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) The Southeast portion of the site is located in the Dorset Park - View Protection Overlav District - Zone D 9) 9a: SEQ SUBDISTRICT (identify in each) Acreage Units Existing Units proposed NRP NRT NR 26.15 1 53 VR _ VC 9b: Are Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) being utilized? Yes If yes, please identify how many and from which parcel (street address) 23 TDR needed. 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) No existing encumbrances 11) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 0.62 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 1.20 c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 9.1 % Proposed 11.95 % Proposed 27.0 % Proposed 9.6 % 2 Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 12) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL. FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) New water main to connect at the ex. Swift St. water main, go through the proposed site, to Vale Drive. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. The application fee shall be paid to th City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details_ ; ZOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer -will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public bearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my kAI�GNATUFT-017 12 APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY O �,R Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / � // V �( — I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: n Comp. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply f6r, and obtain relevant state permits fbr this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Southeast Quadrant Sketch Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Spear Meadow - Farrell Subdivision Adjoiners List 11-26-14 Subject Property Tax Map Parcel 1640-01340 1340 Spear St. South Burlington, VT Parcel ID 911# Unit Street Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 0557-00023 23 DOREY RD LIN HSING & SUNG CHI 23 DOREY RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 0557-00024 24 DOREY RD VANKOEVERING MICHAEL & SUSAN 24 DOREY RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 0570-01225 1225 DORSET ST C. SHAND ET AL 1225 DORSET ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1160-00214 214 MEADOWOOD DR SCOLLINS MICHAEL 1 & MARY D 214 MEADOWOOD DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1160-00219 219 MEADOWOOD DR KLEH THOMAS R & LOUISE T 219 MEADOWOOD DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00001 1 PINNACLE DR BAKER DAVID G 1R & ELIZABETH A H 1 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00002 2 PINNACLE DR ROBERTS R LAWRENCE & SHIRLEY T TRUST 2 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00004 4 PINNACLE DR SALTZMAN BRIAN 4 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00005 5 PINNACLE DR BROSSEAU BRETT & AISHA 5 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00007 7 PINNACLE DR BRIDGE DANIEL C & CHRISTINE 1 7 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00008 8 PINNACLE DR PIZER CHARLES & PENNY 8 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00010 101 PINNACLE DR BRANA PAUL & JEAN 10 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00011 11 PINNACLE DR CHESS STANLEY D 330 EAST 75TH ST NEW YORK NY 10021 1338-00012 12 PINNACLE DR PALM KENNETH & PHYLLIS 12 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00014 14 PINNACLE DR WIJETUNGA SUSITH & JOLYN 14 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00015 15 PINNACLE DR GREGOIRE CHRISTOPHER T & SUSAN C 15 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00016 16 PINNACLE DR BAUER WILLIAM & CYNTHIA 16 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00018 18 PINNACLE DR VARIN CHRIS A & JENNIFER L 18 PINNACLE DR 5 BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00019 19 PINNACLE DR PEET FRED V TRUST 19 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00020 20 PINNACLE DR KNISELY GEOFFREY 20 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00022 22 PINNACLE DR DONAHUE KEVIN & MICHELE 22 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00023 23 PINNACLE DR LARKIN JOSEPH F 410 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00024 24 PINNACLE DR IYU JUN & MIAO LIMIN 24 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00026 261 PINNACLE DR ROBERTS DEREK & CAROLYN 26 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 105403 1338-00027 27 PINNACLE DR KHORRAMI MOHAMMAD N & MAHNAZ M 27 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00028 28 PINNACLE DR MEUNIER GABRIELLE E 28 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00029 29 PINNACLE DR LARRABEE JERRY G 29 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00031 31 PINNACLE DR SLEIMAN RONALD & CHRISTINE 31 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00035 35 PINNACLE DR WARSHAW DAVID M & PATRICIA M 35 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00039 39 PINNACLE DR GRAY ELLIOT W & MOLLIE M 39 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00041 41 PINNACLE DR GRINBERG FANCISCO & SUSAN E 41 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00042 42 PINNACLE DR MILLER THOMAS J & DEBRA A TRUSTEE 42 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00043 43 PINNACLE DR RIPPA S ALEXANDER TRUSTEE 43 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00044 44 PINNACLE DR BERTGES KIRSTEN L TRUST 44 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00045 45 PINNACLE DR RACINE KATHLEEN YANDOW TRUST 45 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00046 46 PINNACLE DR GRIFFITHS ANDREW & LESLIE 46 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00047 47 PINNACLE DR KEOGH TIMOTHY & CHRISTINE 47 PINNACLE DR 5 BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00048 48 PINNACLE DR ROVNER ARTHUR S & LISA 1 48 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00049 49 PINNACLE DR GAGNON MICHAEL & HEIDI 49 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00050 50 PINNACLE DR NAHAR RAHUL & APARNA 50 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00051 51 PINNACLE DR JOHNSON GERALD 51 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00052 52 PINNACLE DR LINDBERG DENNIS & SANDRA 52 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00053 53 PINNACLE DR WOOD LARRY N & MARIE E 53 PINNACLE DR LOT 41 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00054 54 PINNACLE DR LEI CHON I & PING Y 54 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00055 55 PINNACLE DR SCHWAIGERT ERIC & DIANA 55 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00056 56 PINNACLE DR SHAFER JEFFREY A & ERIN E 56 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00057 57 PINNACLE DR XIA TIAN 57 PINNACLE DR 5 BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00058 1 58 1PINNACLE DR BAECHLE TIMOTHY & LYNNE 58 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00059 1 59 1PINNACLE DR IBRADLEY LINDA D 159 PINNACLE DR IS BURLINGTON VT 105403 1338-00060 1 601 1 PINNACLE DR IBURKE JOSEPH & JENNIFER 160 PINNACLE DR IS BURLINGTON 1vr 105403 Page 1 of 2 # 02250.00 Spear Meadow - Farrell Subdivision Adjoiners list 11-26-14 Subject Property Tax Map Parcel 1640-01340 1340 Spear St. South Burlington, VT Parcel ID 911# Unit Street Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 1338-00061 61 PINNACLE DR SUSINNO-JONES ADRIENNE M TRUST 61 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00062 62 PINNACLE DR GREGOIRE CONCETTA N & MAURICE A 62 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00063 63 PINNACLE DR ROGERS MARGOT B 63 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00065 65 PINNACLE DR ZAGURSKY JOSEPH & ANGELA 65 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00067 67 PINNACLE DR CARR FRANCES 67 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1338-00069 69 PINNACLE DR FOSS DANIEL DWIGHT & OLGA L 69 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01285 1285 SPEAR ST BEAN JOHN & HEIDI 1285 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01295 1295 SPEAR ST MARROQUIN CARLOS E & BRIDGET M 1295 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01300 1300 SPEAR ST SAWTELLE KATHLEEN M 1300 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01302 1302 SPEAR ST FARRELL GARY N 1350 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01317 1317 SPEAR ST AVONDA ROBERT 1 & TAMMY L 1317 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01331 1331 SPEAR ST LAVIGNE ROBERT E & ESTALEEN R P 0 BOX 2061 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 1640-01350 1350 SPEAR ST 1350 SPEAR LLC 111 GOODRICH DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 1640-01393 1393 SPEAR ST CIMONETTI WILLIAM 1 & TANYA J 1393 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01400 1400 SPEAR ST GILBERT WILLIAM A & MAUREEN G 1400 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01402 1402 SPEAR ST YOUNG LINDA & DAVID 1402 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01404 14041 SPEAR ST TARRANT RICHARD E DR 1404 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01406 1406 SPEAR ST FRANZONI DOUGLAS 1 & CHRISTINE 1406 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01408 1408 SPEAR ST MUHR DIANE 1 1408 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1640-01430 1430 SPEAR ST DENCKER MARGARETA D P 0 BOX 1682 OLNEY MD 20830-1682 1645-00089 89 SPRINGHOUSE RD SKIFF ROBERT A & MARJORIE N 89 SPRINGHOUSE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1645-00112 116 SPRINGHOUSE RD GRABOWSKI P BRETT & J. L. MILOT 116 SPRING HOUSE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00001 1 VALE DR JENNINGS JULIE 1 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00002 2 VALE DR BOGNER OF AMERICA INC 185 ALLEN BROOK LN #201 WILLISTON VT 05495 1742-00003 3 VALE DR BENNER LAURA B TRUST 3 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00004 4 VALE DR XIA RUI11A 4 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00005 5 VALE DR CHARASH LORI 5 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00006 6 VALE DR TOUPIN ERIC 6 VALE DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00007 7 VALE DR EDWARDS WILLIAM E & JULIE E TRUST 7 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00008 8 VALE DR TANG GEORGE & LINDA 8 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00009 9 VALE DR BERMAN ROBERT M TRUST 35 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403-7824 1742-00010 10 VALE DR DUBIE CHRISTOPHER D & SARA L 10 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00011 11 VALE DR FLEMER STEVENSON JR & SANDRA B 11 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00012 12 VALE DR KNISBACHER MITCHELL & SANDRA S 12 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00014 14 VALE DR CHAMBERLAIN FORREST L & DIANE G 14 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00015 15 VALE DR CARLSON MATTHEW M & KAZUKO S 15 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00016 16 VALE DR LANDERMAN BRYAN 1 & KRISTEN L 16 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00017 17 VALE DR ABBOTT MARIAM 17 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00018 18 VALE DR METROPOULOS JAMES TRUST 18 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00019 19 VALE DR WAHEED WAQAR 19 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00020 20 VALE DR METROPOULOS CHRISTINA TRUST 754 Ethan Allen Highway Charlotte VT 05445-9563 1742-00021 211 VALE DR WALCOTT PETER 21 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00023 23 VALE DR CHURCH KYLE N & SUSAN F 23 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00025 25 VALE DR SHEDLEUR ALAIN 25 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00026 26 VALE DR BIEBER MATT & EMILY 26 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00027 27 VALE DR BARIYAJANN FATHIMA 27 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1742-00029 29 VALE DR ZHANG AN RONG 792 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON 1vr 105403 1742-00031 1 31 VALE DR ROUNDS GARY 131 VALE DRIVE IS BURLINGTON 1VT 105403 1742-00033 1 331 IVALE DR ILARKIN / MILOT PARTNERSHIP 1410 SHELBURNE RD IS BURLINGTON 1VT I05403 Page 2 of 2 # 02250.00 The Snyder Group, Inc. Merchants Bank 4076 Shelburne Road #6 Shelburne. VT05462 VENDOR:130215 CITY OF S BURLINGTON CHECK NO:192653 CHECK DATE:12/15/14 'SATE INVOICE ENTITY GROSS DISCOUNT NET EXPLANATION 14/15/14 121514SPEA 001 The Snyder Group, 2,650.50 .00 2,650.50 Sketch Plan -SM Check Total: 2,650.50 .00 2,650.50 /Yx� Sn der Homes �yi—Your Builder of Choice August 13, 2015 Ray Belair Administrative Officer Planning & Zoning Office City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 054503 RE: Spear Meadow Sketch Plan review Dear Ray: I'm writing to submit a revised sketch plan layout for the Spear Meadows project. The following summarizes the changes between the March 6 sketch plan and the enclosed August 1 1 sketch plan: - The total number of units has been reduced from 53 to 49 units. This total includes the existing Farrell house at 1350 Spear Street. - The previously proposed street connection to the Vale Drive cul-de-sac has been eliminated. A bike path connection to Vale Drive is still proposed. A cul-de-sac is proposed at the south end of the new public street. - The revised curvilinear alignment of the new north -south public street will provide some variation along the streetscape, as well as along the bike path. - The triplex units proposed at the south end of the project parcel have been replaced with duplex buildings that will front on the new public street. - The two single family lots have been eliminated. - The public park has increased in size (with the elimination of the single family lots). Onstreet parallel parking spaces are proposed near the cul-de-sac for public access to the park. A trail is proposed between the new public street and the portion of the park west of the wetland. - Space for neighborhood gardens will be provided within the public park. - The units on the north side of Spear Meadow Road have been reconfigured. These changes were made in response to comments from staff and neighbors. I look forward to reviewing the sketch plan with the Development Review Board. Please contact Ine with any questions. Sincerely, Christopher Snyder 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6, Shelburne, VT 05482 802.985.5722 / 802.497.0701 fax snyderhomesvt.com Ik OWEEN CERTIFIED I I . �� 1 1 ASTRONOMIC I I 1 / fly RBIT. I C. Shand et al CONC. Rom. PATH--'*- 1 I 0670-01225 s, GRAPHIC SCALE T. and L. Kleh "—" ;AW 7111- ���'-�e���� -x-�-- -- r , _ Open Space 60 0 30 60 120 240 I M. and M. Scollins I 1160-00219 1160-00214 Pinnacle at Spear t , __-x- �'1 _ _ - TYPICAL DUPLEX _ - n=eon. I BUILDING occ'rem o C ' - - - P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot - _ " rr l ;�, i VALES, 1645-00089 i _ y :� SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (FOOTPRINT LOTS) DUPLEX UNITS 28 UNITS TOTAL 49 UNITS 20 UNITS I / K. SAWTELLE 1 1640-01300 1 r� 1 C.and6. Marroquin 1640-01295 1 I I R. and T. Avonda 1640-01317 I I 4 ' 1 RE STRICTED AREA ZONING BOUNDARY / K ^NE11' �• 'MBE�yBIT. 4 1350 SPEAR LLC ROM CONCRETE cuk� r 1640-01350...../- oREM STREET � \ EXI5TING 5mn RIM=390.0t INv-385.4t and E. Lavigne L, m 1� // / �.I I I I I I I • I �� I My 77 D. Muhr - / 1640-01408 L. and D. Ymungl i i I I I � � I I M. Dencker --.-- / 1640-01 02 .l Fa 4re� / i / I'4 � I I � � ", � 1640-01430 .....,t G. arld , , ume 142, Pages 5„?l i i L R+/and T. ±2s acres ,.t' // , -� 1 arrant 1 1P40-01404 10 and C. Franzoni � 1640-01406 I / SPEAR MEADOWS - I SKETCH PLAN AUGUST 11, 2015 I 1 I �� Asrmxaac I I ' C I C. Shand et al REM PATH r - 0670-01225 _ _ —,r- - -'�a e _ nt--� I 1 r a•O GRAPHIC SCALE I T. and L. Kleh - -. - Open Space 6➢ 0 00 m 120 240 M. and M. Scollins I 1160-00219 _ _ ,. '_- - Pinnacle at Speor E$ 1160-00214y- TYPICAL DUPLEX BUILDING ODE G P.B. Grabowski and J. L. MilotCONC.� - I VALE 1645-00069 - _-:- _ i ' 1 I 4 _ I D IVE 3 14 ' 15 6 19 I 1 j�-x....- r.• �v ;1 '12. ? 1D' DEBIT. CON* REGPATH SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT -.. --------------- �` 1` Al f" ..0 �� _ _ `z` I / 1•.'.' Larkin/Milot Partnership - _ 1742-00033 3 r e 6 BLIC S7 apsm¢T P,v+KiNc - �\ i , -. � Cf SPARK REST - -' - y- �' - NEW PU _ r \ 1 �'• Q��O - - _ _ - I - �1 -,r 3 ,a. , M.. y 2e• *DE _ ou000u� _ _ _ -_ .. . EL I I — RC 4,I PA e .• u� M i, � 1 I o 0 WATERAREA STORM ins 31 �, Q �,�No TRAIL r' Spear 164Me0adows, Inc. �,: I .-a .PiPr�ooNs�r.�'•p�-'• — — — — •�•. .Q- •O.. TYPICAL DUPLEX �� :i-' �� _... �• • • .�� BUILDING '� • •_ WETLANDS DELINEATED BY \/6 y�� �'— 1R ,TIDE ILL ��yy/� �y :✓. - _ — — — — — — �I _ t•• ,'• .1 •� WIWAMDEI`• 6.�. Mr. SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 20 UNITS — — i• •� •-� TYPICAL SINGLE AUG I I (FOOTPRINT LOTS) :•.•,• •-.'. J FAMILY HOME— • — . _ . • SPAS . .I�I I tCfl DUPLEX UNITS 28 UNITS � OPEN TOTAL 49 UNITS -� I I /K. SAWTELLE 1640-01300 1 _ 1 .Vi ` f• yx , C. and B. m Marroquin 1640-01296 I I R. and T. Avonda I 1640-01317 1 • I I � 24' I ® --------------- W. and M. Gilbert 1640-01400 PROPOSED / PUBLIC PARK & NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS / (7.0 AC.) City Of So. Bur Ing OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR RESTRICTED AREA NING BOUNDARY �I C , a ®- 1350 SPEAR LLC 1640-01350 J_ - / I L I m / L_ -� I 1 L. and D. YmungI I � I--� , 1640-01408 I M. Dencker � r 1640-0142 e z 1640-01430 - - I I tAR s�Rr�r\ E705TING SN„— RIM -1 INV=385.4t and E. Lavigne G. ar1d.L Farr Ame 142. Pages-0-47 / % /' t29 acres T. I I I� I I I R. and arrant I! , TI I I I �I, — I I 1 � / I '(40-01404 I /pI� and C. Franzoni 1640-01406 j I 1 SPEAR MEADOWS SKETCH PLAN AUGUST 11, 2015 ray From: Chris Snyder <csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 7:17 AM To: ray; Paul Conner Subject: Spear Meadows Ray and Paul, I am requesting that the proposed sketch plan application for Spear Meadows be continued until the August DRB hearing. Do you need anything else from me to continue this hearing? Thanks, Chris Snyder Snyder Homes 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone (802) 985-5722 Fax (802)497-0701 csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com ray From: Chris Snyder <csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 7:19 PM To: ray Subject: Spear Meadows Ray, I am requesting that the sketch plan meeting scheduled for Spear Meadows project be postponed to the second meeting in June. Please contact me if you need anything else. Chris 6, j�7 BuRAK,ANDERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL Mr. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax: 802 862-8176 wNwvtlawl.com March 11, 2015 Re: Snyder Homes Sketch Plan Application # SD -l 4-37 (S. Burl Dev. Rev. Bd.) Dear Chairman Barritt: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced matter for William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street,; Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group"). I was not able to attend the January 20th DRB sketch meeting on the above -referenced matter, but I understand from my clients that the topic of Transferable Development Rights (TDR's) came up, and that the Neighbors Group offered to send the DRB a letter on the subject, as well as other matters related to the proposed project. I would be grateful if you would accept this letter as part of that submission and include it in the packet of materials for the DRB's March 17th meeting. The Applicant seeks DRB approval for as many as twenty-two TDR-based units of density in order to add to the property's allowable base density of thirty-one units, for a maximum of fifty-three units. The Neighbors Group continues to maintain that the TDR bylaw contained within the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) is unenforceable because it fails to comply with State law — specifically 24 V.S.A. § 4423 — and because it is unconstitutionally void for vagueness under the standards set out in the Vermont Supreme Court case of In re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC, 2008 VT 110, 185 Vt. 201, 969 A.2d 47. On the subject of TDR's, the Applicant failed to respond to Question 9b on the Sketch. Plan Application form as to the location, including street address, from which the TDR's would be transferred. As such, the Neighbors Group. submits that the DRB should await receipt of such information before proceeding further on the Application. (In that connection, the Applicant also Chair TimBarritt March 11, 2015 BURAK ANDERSON ,`,, MELLONIi,ui Mar Page 2 of 2 failed to state any legal interest in the real estate that is the subject of the Application, as is required in response to Application Question 4.) I am advised that, during the January 20th sketch meeting, the DRB indicated that it might consider consulting with the City Attorney regarding the implementation and interpretation of the City's TDR bylaw. The Neighbors Group welcomes such an inquiry and I would request that the DRB allow the undersigned and Neighbors Group member and retired lawyer Mr. William A. Gilbert to participate in such a discussion with the City Attorney and/or the DRB. I note that the Applicant has requested to meet with various City officials as part of the Application's preparation and in response to the DRB's concerns. Therefore, I request respectfully that Mr. Gilbert and I be included as part of any similar review of the TDR issue. I understand that the DRB raised several other issues during the January 20th sketch meeting that require additional information and a further response from the Applicant. The Neighbors Group reserves comment on these matters and requests the opportunity to comment after the Applicant provides the DRB with additional information and/or a further response. A substantial portion of the Planning and Zoning Staff comments that the DRB reviewed during the January 20th sketch meeting would not exist or would be ameliorated substantially if the project's density were reduced. For example, block lengths, road crossings, traffic impact, interrupted sidewalks and safety issues, recreation path locations, adequacy of community garden space in the planned very dense central portion of the project, ingress, egress, turnaround space, garage and parking location. Under these circumstances, the Neighbors Group suggests respectfully that the best course of action would be for the DRB to direct the Applicant to revise the project's design to a lower and more reasonable and realistic density (rather than trying to mold the requested permit to allow excess TDR-based density). On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB members for their consideration and courtesies. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Cathyann LaRose, AICP, City Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) 35 Pinnacle Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 April 5, 2015 South Burlington City Development Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Snyder Homes Sketch Plan Review Application #SD-14-37 Dear Review Board Members: I want to first state that I appreciate your commitment and effort as our representatives to managing the future growth and development of housing within the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). At the March 17, 2015 DRB meeting to discuss the proposed Planned Unit Development by Snyder Homes (#SD-14-27) off of Spear St., I promised to submit a letter detailing my concerns about the use of TDRs for this proposal. Therefore, I would like this letter to be entered into the record as a concerned citizen in the SEQ regarding the negative impact TDRs may have on existing neighborhoods. Snyder Homes proposes to build 53 family units off of Spear Street by using Transfer Development Rights (TDRs), nearly doubling what this parcel in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ) is zoned for. Although TDRs are designed to protect our natural resources, the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan also understands the need to protect neighborhoods from drastic changes in character by future developments. Does a developer's commercial interest trump a neighborhood's right to maintain its quality of life, not to mention its property values? At present, this conflict exists within the South Burlington's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Regulations. The only arbiter of this debate is the Development Review Board (DRB). Interestingly, the Land Use Regulations state that: "... the Development Review Board may then approve the assignment (transfer) of all or a portion of the residential development density calculated for a non-contiguous encumbered parcel to another parcel..." This statement unambiguously gives the DRB full license to determine how much density can be transferred. Therefore, the DRB is not obligated to accept the TDRs as proposed by Snyder Homes if it feels that the goals of the SEQ Comprehensive Plan will be compromised, which are clearly stated as: "Existing residential neighborhoods should be protected from inappropriate, out -of -character transitions in land use..." All of the abutting properties are single family dwellings. Thus, this high -density proposal will be an island surrounded by single family homes. It is my view and that voiced by numerous neighbors that the Snyder Homes proposal constitutes such an inappropriate and out of character transition in land use. The city residents rely on the DRB's judgment to address these conflicts with our best interests in mind rather than the commercial interests of the developer. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Da id Warshaw, Ph.D. LETTER TO DRB 3/11/15 RE SPEAR MEADOWS Spear Meadows development has been discussed in detail by the DRB, neighbors and developers for nearly 10 years. Many of the abutters of this project have resided here for 30 or more years, and chose their homesites when the zoning in that field allowed only one unit per 10 acres. It was with that info that I chose to purchase my lot in 1974, over several other options. The zoning was changed to a max of 1.2 units per acre 20 years ago, at which time the DRB was created to ensure that interests of developers and abutters alike were protected. When the Farrells initially proposed their development 10 years ago, the neighbors were confident that development would be limited to a max of 1.2 units per acre, since all the homes to the east and west of the field occupied two or more acres, and higher density would, we felt, be incompatible with the surrounding area. The plan for the full 31 units was approved, and the neighbors accepted this plan, since it was reasonably tasteful, didn't infringe excessively on abutting homes, included a reasonably practical recreation path, and was aesthetically consistent with Pinnacle to the South. When the Farrells returned to the DRB with a new proposal to use TDR's to expand the density, the neighbors were hopeful that the Board would exercise its discretion to disallow application of TDR's to the site, as any effort to do so would result in density incompatible with the site itself as well as the surrounding area.. What followed have been a series of at least 6 hyperdense proposals that could only serve the interests of the developer. This site rests at the northwest corner of the southeast quadrant, and serves as its window from the north or west. Whenever I casually mention to visitors or friends that 50 or more units may be erected in that field (indeed, due to the wetland, most of the units would be along the easterly border, packed into an area of about 10 acres), they react with animated disbelief. Whatever is built in that field will serve as a major landmark for our City for the foreseeable future. I urge the DRB to ensure that it's done properly. We are depending on the DRB to safeguard the interests of the neighbors and of the City. I respectfully suggest that the DRB limit the maximum density to 1.2 units per acre such that the Spear Meadows homesites are both appropriate to the site as well as more compatible with the surrounding area, and also to allow a proper park and recreation path. Thanks very much for your consideration, and for your continued hard work. Respectfully. Michael J. Scollins, 214 Meadowood Drive Cc: City Council P.B. Grabowski-_. �.,• and J. L. Milot - - -r .� �< Mal _ .••'-�' � �I` 1645-00089 -, SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS R. and T. Avonda I 1 1640-0139 I i`4-.-._..— , . .i t l �.�.•.•.•. •� •••ciP.rN�iF••-••.'.'•'•• • WETLANDS DELINEATED BY E 1S N1UE 9I7. :.i I % } t• .• • •• • �•� WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN "T • .�, .. • ... s ..T_•'� —"�rN ? TYPICAL SINGLE `��., l•• T4.4 qq �:.:.�. EIi--.-- VALE® DkIVE ' FAMILY HOME t NEW ZV WDE BIT. ! PUBLIC PARKING CONC. "°"° wi M. CONC2EIERB W. and MGilbert OPEN SPACE $ CUr ; X 1640-01400 j SINGLE I PINNACLE AT SPEAR FAMILY 5 /13• LOT SINGLE y FAMILY / K LOT i d ESTRICTED AREA — — ;' PROPOSED I ZONING BOUNDARY i PUBLIC PARK / (1.9 AC.)01 y LOT 1 „ v2o w elT. 0 1350 SPEAR LLC ' ,- '�•• Y--� I �.,. 1640-01350 ,� �/ / I ���rt. 6 C / �..t•, >r_ I I 1 I l I I I / f / i ' � E i / I ... ..i ` I L. and D. Ymungl -- D. Muhr- 1640-01408 M. Dencker 4-f 1s4o—o,laa,z �.i... J,,Farrell G. iind -4 -47 Ime 142, Fs98s ..... ,-2.9 acres / / � � I , . j /,/ifi , I , , i I"JR. land T. �, arrant I I r- I 1640-0 430 l EXISTING 511h— RIM=39D.Dt INV=386.4t and E. Lavigne I 1640-01404 and C. Franzoni 1640-01406 F _......,...SPEAR ME ADOWS _ II SKETCH PLAN MARCH 6, 2015 - Location Map - Not 7o SceN Referenced Plats or Plans A. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY - PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE OF ILA M ISHAM', PREPARED BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., LAST REVISED JUNE 30, 1999. B. "PLAN OF LAND OF HARRY B. and BERNICE N. CONKLIW, PREPARED BY J.M. SINCLAIR, DATED JULY 1943. C. "FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT & JOHN LARKIN - PINNACLE @ SPEAR" (FORMERLY NOWLAND TWO), PREPARED BY BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED 8/21/1998. D. "PLAT SHOWING SURVEYAND SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LANDS OF PINNACLE 1@ SPEAR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION", PREPARED BY LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED & BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED MARCH 31,1999 (PLAT SU DE 340-5). E. "SWIFT ESTATES", PREPARED BY VMLLIS ENGINEERING, DATED SEPT. 21, 1971 (PLAT SLIDE 98-10). F. "LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAT", PREPARED BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., DATED APRIL 21, 2002. G. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT - LANDS OF SPEAR MEADOWS, INC., R.&T. TARRANT, AND D.&C. FRANZONr , PREPARED BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, DATED JANUARY 25, 2011 (PLAT SLIDE 550-5). "SWIFT ESTATES" SUBDIVISION QQ / 0 0�=/0 214 Meedowood 219 Mead°w°°d I U' Do Gr b k' I I T& L K/eh C and at al 3 `v a ows I M. & M. Scollins 2/ y ` & J. L. Milot Volume 175 Page 183 Volume 405 Page 726 O Ah+nno,n�a Volume 643 Page 297 I Volume 115 Pege 523 1'. SEE NOTE 3 I 20' Recreational Easement J14" IPF 507' 16•E 505.3 '35'E See Note 8 t.25 AG 50T32'21'E ., •, S0 �� L,,( •)< >~ X_ iE -Bf-�T� ii--n-- - - - 208'0 � �� 1 454.43' 1'IPF 359.08 -------------------_---T_- - - 2" s 268.55' 1/2•AIBF 317.02' 1.0* G Open Space 0' AC � � 25' AG �OfS�p �•[ "Pinnacle Q Spear Subdivision I ua4"eg3�aahy -uyon9tOF7\/ Spear Meadows, Inc. I VAjE Larkin/Milot DRIVE w I Volume 747 Pages 653-656 / Partnership , o I" March 31 2006 Volume 296 Page 538 cuL De UVM & State Agricultural College 8 +1 I �'`,�® Volume 134 Page 364 ~ 22.22 - aC/BS RC r V I � DEC 1 2014 T-Bw Found T-' A F n0 (copped) __ 299.53' _ os'ac I D. ]' AG ��pp,, N14'23'S1"E NO3'S3r44'Wwi� 0f �O, Burlington 79.93' I fV= z 1/2• IPF UNDEVELOPED LANDS /� 1.0' Ac 1340 SPEAR STREET V G.N. Farrell / I � I "PINNACLE @SPEAR" SUBDIVISION Volume e77 Page 402 r3 I w I S en O ace h 0.94 • acres P P N724.46' '._lo' 24. -40 E Pi m M ^ o 514' IPF (Bent) W. & M. Gilbert 0.5' Ac = = ` 4 Vol209 Pe e 225 I a c% p\_ J/4Fl� N1g 4 z' / ume q SURVEYORS: / \ 5 e? \ I S'f / h I AG I I 1` J�n..M i / K. M. Sawtelle n K I Nta 3a'sa E _ c Volume 1139 To Pege 83 I.01Z' PF \ N \ `a2' Ac �°x` \ ,� � 7302 Speer St. ppS J/4" IPF j��Sry��"p O. 1V Haan s14 "q s 1. y I.o' AG , W 90.00, - \ S1q:341'Sq� - Survey Notes - 1. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO DEPICT THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF LANDS OF SPEAR I \ \ MEADOWS, INC., OF G. & J FARRELL, AND OF G.N. FARRELL. OTHER PROPERTY LINES I # 1295 SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY, ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY, AND Marroqum I as.I G ARE NOT EMBRACED BY THE CERTIFICATION BELOW. # 1317 I 1.1. A BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT HAS BEEN CONTEMPLATED AND APPROVED (CIRCA I Avonde 2010-11) BETWEEN THE SUBJECT LANDS AND THOSE OF TARRANT AND FRANZONI (SEE REFERENCE PLAT "G'). AS OF NOVEMBER 2014, THE LAND TRANSFERS HAD NOT TAKEN PLACE. THE PRE -ADJUSTMENT BOUNDARIES ARE DEPICTED HEREON. 2. THE PERIMETER BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH AN ELECTRONIC TOTAL I STATION BETWEEN FALL 2003 AND WINTER 2004-5. ADDITIONAL SURVEYING AT TARRANT/FRANZONI WAS CONDUCTED WINTER 2011. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE REFERENCED TO ASTRONOMIC NORTH BASED ON SOLAR OBSERVATIONS MADE IN SEPTEMBER, 1995. SEE REFERENCE PLAN W. 4. SURVEY MARKERS PROPOSED SHALL CONSIST OF 5/9" DIAMETER REHAR OR 4" SQUARE CONCRETE MONUMENTS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED "CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOC. -VTLS597". IRON PIPES FOUND ARE SHOWN WITH INSIDE DIAMETERS. S. SPEAR STREET HAS A RECORD 66 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY. LOCATION HERE DETERMINED BY EXISTING MONUMENTATION AND THE TRAVELED PORTION OF THE ROAD. REFERENCE TOWN OF BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS 1802-1865, PAGE 22 AND TOWN OF SHELBURNE TOWN MINUTES VOLUME 1, PAGE 229. 6. MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE, SANITARY SEWER, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE LOT LINES OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL FROM POINTS OF ORIGIN THROUGH PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR RECORDED EASEMENTS. 7. BEING OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY, CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. HAS UNDERTAKEN NO INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER THE PROPERTY AND EACH COMPONENT THEREOF IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL OR STATE PERMITS. 8. THIS PROPERTY LIES IN THE "SOUTHEAST QUADRANT' AND "DORSET PARK SCENIC PROTECTION -ZONED" ZONING DISTRICTS. 9. A 60 WADE EASEMENT AND A 20' WADE "RECREATIONAL EASEMENT, BETWEEN VALE DRIVE AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, ARE DEPICTED ON REFERENCE PLAN D, AND REVISED (AS SHOWN HEREON ON REFERENCE PLAN C. THE EARLIER ALIGNMENT IS REFERENCED IN AN "IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION" TO THE CITY DATED NOV. 15, 1995 AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 428 AT PAGE 732. 10. SEE OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DOUG & CHRISTINE FRANZONI AND SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. FOR A 30' WADE SEWER EASEMENT TO BE CONVEYED TO CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VOLUME 862 PAGE 318 (5/15/09). 11. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE SOLELY WITHIN AN AREA SHOWN AS "ZONE C - AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING' PER. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL 500195-0005-B, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 18, 1981. -Legend- 3 / n � 1350 Spear LLC Volume 1031 Page 73 / ' a; ' See 2.993 acres / I Survey Note 1.1 N13 ^� 'O I 8g BS wF 6 pg E ,. / I P 1350 Spear Street v p•' I I ?Op?p,�\°5' / I D. & L. I1r•-J_�'L� I N1SS3Z3E \ . Young - Volume2I III \?3t30T6o, F-d q page #1 # 1406 (cpd) \ Fwd 0J' AG J/a' ivF Flush p �i% I # 1402 I R. & T. I / # 1331 a.5" Z f ��� • \ I Vola 9t # 1408 I D. & D. I °1 Lavigne 'Itr-Bar me. Pate 329 Franzoni M. Dencker 3/4' IPF NOIF 3 \ (Banff Ij Volume 137 Flush eT AC I VOIUnIe 211 # 1393 S 1.25"t � Page 447 D 1. Muhr Pege 323 I Cimmoneni 1 3/4' lPF (C ��) �V�r of � I O & G.A. I ( 518' MF I a Sporzynskl # 1387 o.z' I Volume 218 / I C I Page 287 ° I 7b ec Wilkins o.Y AG Pr (Disturbed) as t aced O?��4Q 1 Yates CMF Q yA, �� O I l Le 431 \ sn ry 'p �� Ta `V 0�47� / • A'L fie' , QO 11.0' A AG -'•sl SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE -- --- OTHER PROPERTY LINE (APPROX.) EASEMENT LINE - - - ZONING BOUNDARY CMF/MMF O CONCRETE/MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND IPF/IRF O IRON PIPE/REBAR FOUND (w/SIZE) A "T BAR' FOUND AG ABOVE GROUND 0 SURVEY MARKER PROPOSED CMP O CONCRETE MON. PROPOSED x , x FENCE LINE 1 GRAPHIC, SCALE ( IN ) I inch - 1100 tt i I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIAtES. IHC, 10 Mansfield View Lane, South Burlington, Vt 05403 802-864-2323 web: www.cea-vt.com CEA CHECKED TRC APPROV9WASN CHECK I DATE I REVISION 12/01/14 UPDATE OWNERS a NOTES 12/22/11 NO CHANGE THIS SHEET 11/25/10 REFLECT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT PLAT of SURVEY Lands of SPEAR MEADOWS, INC. 1340 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT DATE DRAWING NUMBER January 25, 2011 ORIGINAL SCALE 1" = 100' PROD. NO. 02250 S1.0 Sheet 1 of 7 i / SITE ENGINEER: 1 I \ MEADOWOODS I - - DRIVE I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. � — fO MANSflEiD V1EWfANE, SOUTH BUAtINGTON, V7 05403 I eozaaazazs FAz eoz Rae-zz>] w.n: wuw.cmv+.com GRAPHIC SCALE 3o E OF ACL ( IN FEET) inch = 100 ft SAV CHA A \ I AS226 Pei APPROVRD �� L SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS M. and M. Book*I I 'To °I / SPEAR STREET I I P& Qraboaak� end J. L Mbt I T. and L peh 1B4 -000B9 1180-00219 _ SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT '3' -----• ----- I -®"-- ----IL�31-� ',• ', ® `___ ®- 1- ®_ iO-, N. s°� a 01 1 /—_\ 1a9 Ot r i i , i i , i i , i \ v89 / PARCEL 7 PaIVIKN1p -- ---- - - - - PROPOSED / »az-000sa PARCEL4 I PUBLIC PARK / •' TH STORM WATER AREA �\ I BUR TT/'' T 1J 1J 1� 1V lS 1 ICEL 5 9- ' ,L1NITa----- - ----- / ,aw-m2ao ---- - - ,y L------'- I ARCEL 9 LacnnoN — LOCATION MAP `'. '^„_ SCALE: T =2000' i •. I ' — ` LEGEND ARCEL2 GPERTY LINE ---------------- BUILDING SETBAC K ,NITA TOUR � EXISTING ,j WEILAND ' ' \ NEIL � _._, AHD BUFFER J �_ _____ __- -- J •. __ _ ______ OOSTN6 PRC°09S — —SS GRAVITY SEWER ONE •,�, \ \ \ �3Y / v' , O mwt W. ( BnM. ® / \ —FM— ER MAIN \ \ \ 4T UA ' ®r t6w-01w0 / © '.� \ — W WATER ONE — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC \ \ ti0e ©-• `- V - 7 " ,' / UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC / K BA —WTELLE y __ Lew-01300 F��7 / _ -- - _ — - UT GAS LNEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONE f+lnnade Spwr LOT 1 GRAVITY SEWER CLEANOU \1 r_ I �„ spa- --------------- G I'I\\\ I y1O STORM DRAINAGE ONE X150 SPEAR LLC _ I I ; I ; / / � � � I C.O. T / \ i \\ / 18w-01350 ', SEWER MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE HYDRANT Y\ \VV 1 ® ® SHUT-GFF I I I T ` / )\\ ® ® CATCH BASIN J jjj���L ,}��,, \ NNACLE POWER POLE /j v/ RIVE EDGE OF WOODS \ ® TRANSFORMER CABINET I I I I C. and El `lV, / I MerrogtAn - � , / /' L .4 D. Y'dtapl �J I I ^ / RGaR RI -SIGN I I ew-mz9s I / / Lew-m46z I I D. MLtm / 7� _ / o . I I I I ,aw-mwe` G ACE D I M. D�� ' I s RensaD size nnrD wcAnoN OF �/eNFrd WLRX AND TRIP IX B ROINGS I I I R and T. Avonda \ / I I I +pw-o1wA I 11 I\ I ,aw-m+x / u.za.la I I ,aw-man I \,� 1 and C. Fran=ori I R and E. Lavvw I I I I 1 \ I IR end T. CFinanettl II/ f� / �. I--_-------..--- II I ll \ \ \ DE C 1 S 2014 SITE \ ' I I ' \ ' \ I �.1. Burlington / LOCATION ZONING REQUIREMENTS � � C�t� of ail 9 ZONING DISTRICT SOUTHEAST OUADRANT - 1 ' I I I Q / / \ I / Q / PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL - NR TOTAL AREA: 25.91 ACRES SITE COVERAGE: I /� V / / I l MAX. BUILDING ERAALLOWED: 15% PROPOSED12% Q \13 . MAY, 2014 MAX. SITE COVERAGE ALLOWED 307 PROPOSED:27% a11 ,00,SEIHACCS DRnvlNc NUMeeR C1.0 FRONT: 20' REAR 3U SIDE:10' I l V I / l I 02250 r' ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:49 AM To: ray Subject: Plan Review - Spear Meadows - #SD-14-37 Ray, I have reviewed the sketch review plans for the referenced project prepared by CEA last revised 12/7/14 and offer the below comments. 1. Eliminate the crosswalk at the main entry across Spear Street. There is no supporting infrastructure on the west side of Spear to even connect to. 2. 1 question placing the crosswalk on Vale Drive near building 15. It would make sense to relocate it to the south where there is a proposed path from the sidewalk to the street across the street from the half -circle parking area for the proposed public park. 3. The northern section of Vale Drive, north of Spear Meadow Road, will not become public until it either 1) connects to the parcel to the north or 2) is redesigned to properly facilitate the efficient movement of maintenance vehicles. 4. A traffic study would need to be performed to support the proposed two exiting lanes from the project onto Spear Street. 5. We have reviewed numerous other versions of this project and will withhold more detailed comments until the version progresses through the process. Thank you, Justin Rabidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 658-7961 jabidoux@sburl.com www.sburl.com Twitter: twitter.com/sbpubworks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. ray From: Sent: To: Subject: Justin Rabidoux Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:44 PM ray FW: Comments on Spear Meadows From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 1:03 PM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: Comments on Spear Meadows Justin, I reviewed plans for the Spear Meadows project that were prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, dated May 2014 and last revised on 12/7/14. 1 would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Also, the project proposes to create greater than 1 acre of impervious area and disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a stormwater permit and stormwater construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire these permits before starting construction. 2. Potash Brook flows through the property in the area labeled as "Mapped Class 2 wetland" on the plans. The stream must be shown on the plans and labeled. The project must meet the stream buffer requirements per section 12.01C of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). 3. The applicant should provide hydrologic modeling for the project in a future submission. Modeling should include information sufficient to evaluate the treatment provided by the proposed detention basin. The modeling must include information related to the 25 year, 24 hour storm event (4.0 inches of rain), so that compliance with Article 15.13F of the City's LDRs can be evaluated. a. The applicant should be aware that the property currently drains to an 18" corrugated metal culvert beneath Spear Street (approximately 375 feet south of the intersection with Swift Street). The ability of this culvert to convey runoff from the project must be evaluated. 4. Class 2 wetland are located on the property. It appears as if the project proposes to impact these wetlands in two locations. Impacts to these wetlands are only allowed if the State of Vermont issues a Conditional Use Determination (CUD). 5. Parcel 5 contains 19 units that back up to the Class 2 wetland and buffer. Parcel 2 contains 4 units that back up to the class 2 wetland and buffer. In a future submission, the applicant should propose a method to delineate the wetland buffer and prevent these units from extending lawns into the buffer and associated wetland. 6. Parcel 4 contains a stormwater treatment area. Stormwater treatment facilities must be located outside of the wetland and stream buffer. 7. The dead end street adjacent to Parcel 4 does not conform to City standards. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 658-7961 x108 Email: Tdipietro@sburl.com Web Site: www.sburl.com Twitter: @SBPubWorks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 12/17/14 Comments Due: January 9, 2015 Project Description/Meeting Date: Sketch plan review application #SD-14-37 of Snyder Homes for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 26 single family dwellings, 3) constructing seven (7) 3-unit multi -family dwellings, and 4) constructing three (3) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Other Notes: Meeting date is 1/20/15 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this �' day of I< . Il. '. l �20 `), a copy of the foregoing public notice for [type of application] # -,6 14 -! [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Dated at S [town/city], Vermont, this it day of J~ , 20 IT _ Printed Name: d'4was tc�,' 12,►•- Phone number and email: - w Signature:" Date: I y l K Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 Spear Meadow - Farrell Subdivision Adjoiners List 11-26-14 Subject Property Tax Map Parcel 1640-01340 1340 Spear St. South Burlington, VT Owner Mailing Address City State Zip LIN HSING & SUNG CHI 23 DOREY RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 VANKOEVERING, MICHAEL & SUSAN 24 DOREY RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 C. SHAND ET AL 1225 DORSET ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SCOLLINS, MICHAELJ & MARY D 214 MEADOWOOD DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 KLEH, THOMAS R & LOUISE T 219 MEADOWOOD DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAKER, DAVID G JR & ELIZABETH A H 1 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBERTS, R LAWRENCE & SHIRLEY T TRUST 2 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SALTZMAN, BRIAN 4 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BROSSEAU, BRETT & AISHA 5 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRIDGE, DANIEL C & CHRISTINE J 7 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 PIZER, CHARLES & PENNY 8 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRANA, PAUL & JEAN 10 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHESS, STANLEY D 330 EAST 75TH ST NEW YORK NY 10021 PALM, KENNETH & PHYLLIS 12 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WIJETUNGA, SUSITH & JOLYN 14 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GREGOIRE, CHRISTOPHER T & SUSAN C 15 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAUER, WILLIAM & CYNTHIA 16 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 VARIN, CHRIS A & JENNIFER L 18 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 PEET, FRED V TRUST 19 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 KNISELY, GEOFFREY 20 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 DONAHUE, KEVIN & MICHELE 22 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LARKIN, JOSEPH F 410 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 YU JUN & MIAO LIMIN 24 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROBERTS, DEREK & CAROLYN 26 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 KHORRAMI, MOHAMMAD N & MAHNAZ M 27 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 MEUNIER, GABRIELLE E 28 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LARRABEE, JERRY G 29 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SLEIMAN, RONALD & CHRISTINE 31 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WARSHAW, DAVID M & PATRICIA M 35 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GRAY, ELLIOT W & MOLLIE M 39 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GRINBERG, FANCISCO & SUSAN E 41 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 MILLER, THOMAS J & DEBRA A TRUSTEE 42 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 RIPPA, S ALEXANDER TRUSTEE 43 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BERTGES,KIRSTEN LTRUST 44 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 RACINE, KATHLEEN YANDOW TRUST 45 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GRIFFITHS, ANDREW & LESLIE 46 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 KEOGH, TIMOTHY & CHRISTINE 147 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON 1VT 05403 Page 1 of 3 # 02250.00 Spear Meadow - Farrell Subdivision Adjoiners List 11-26-14 Subject Property Tax Map Parcel 1640-01340 1340 Spear St. South Burlington, VT Owner Mailing Address City State Zip ROVNER, ARTHUR S & LISA 1 48 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GAGNON, MICHAEL & HEIDI 49 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 NAHAR, RAHUL & APARNA 50 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 JOHNSON, GERALD 51 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LINDBERG, DENNIS & SANDRA 52 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WOOD, LARRY N & MARIE E 53 PINNACLE DR LOT 41 S BURUNGTON VT 05403 LEI, CHON I & PING Y 54 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 _ SCHWAIGERT, ERIC & DIANA 55 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHAFER, JEFFREY A & ERIN E 56 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 XIA, TIAN 57 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BAECHLE, TIMOTHY & LYNNE 58 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BRADLEY, LINDA D 59 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BURKE, JOSEPH & JENNIFER 60 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SUSINNO-JONES, ADRIENNE M TRUST 61 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GREGOIRE, CONCETTA N & MAURICE A 62 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROGERS, MARGOT B 63 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ZAGURSKY, JOSEPH & ANGELA 65 PINNACLE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CARR, FRANCES 67 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 FOSS, DANIEL DWIGHT & OLGA L 69 PINNACLE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BEAN, JOHN & HEIDI 1285 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 MARROQUIN, CARLOS E & BRIDGET M 1295 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SAWTELLE, KATHLEEN M 1300 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 FARRELL, GARY N 1350 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 AVONDA, ROBERT J & TAMMY L 1317 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LAVIGNE, ROBERT E & ESTALEEN R P 0 BOX 2061 S BURLINGTON VT 05407 1350 SPEAR LLC 111 GOODRICH DRIVE WILLISTON VT 05495 CIMONETTI, WILLIAM J & TANYA J 1393 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GILBERT, WILLIAM A & MAUREEN G 1400 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 YOUNG, LINDA & DAVID 1402 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 TARRANT, RICHARD E DR 1404 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 FRANZONI, DOUGLAS J & CHRISTINE 1406 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 MUHR, DIANE 1 1408 SPEAR ST S BURLINGTON VT 05403 DENCKER, MARGARETA D P 0 BOX 1682 OLNEY MD 20830-1682 SKIFF, ROBERT A & MARJORIE N 89 SPRINGHOUSE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 GRABOWSKI, P BRETT & J. L. MILOT 1116 SPRING HOUSE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 JENNINGS, JULIE 11 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 Page 2 of 3 # 02250.00 Spear Meadow - Farrell Subdivision Adjoiners List 11-26-14 Subject Property Tax Map Parcel 1640-01340 1340 Spear St. South Burlington, VT Owner Mailing Address City State Zip BOGNER OF AMERICA INC 185 ALLEN BROOK LN #201 WILLISfON VT 05495 BENNER, LAURA B TRUST 3 VALE DR S BURLNGTON VT 05403 XIA, RUIJIA _ 4 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHARASH, LORI 5 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 TOUPIN, ERIC 6 VALE DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 EDWARDS, WILLIAM E & JULIE E TRUST 7 VALE DRIVE S BURUNGTON VT 05403 TANG, GEORGE & LINDA 8 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BERMAN, ROBERT M TRUST 35 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403-7824 DUBIE, CHRISTOPHER D & SARA L 10 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 FLEMER, STEVENSON JR & SANDRA B 11 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 KNISBACHER, MITCHELL & SANDRA S 12 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHAMBERLAIN, FORREST L & DIANE G 14 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CARLSON, MATTHEW M & KAZUKO S 15 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LANDERMAN, BRYAN J & KRISTEN L 16 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ABBOTT, MARIAM 17 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 METROPOULOS, JAMES TRUST 18 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 WAHEED, WAQAR 19 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 METROPOULOS, CHRISTINA TRUST 754 Ethan Allen Highway Charlotte VT 05445-9563 WALCOTT, PETER 21 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 CHURCH, KYLE N & SUSAN F 23 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 SHEDLEUR, ALAIN 25 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BIEBER, MATT & EMILY 26 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 BARIYAJANN, FATHIMA 27 VALE DR S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ZHANG, AN RONG 792 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 ROUNDS, GARY 31 VALE DRIVE S BURLINGTON VT 05403 LARKIN / MILOT PARTNERSHIP 410 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 105403 Page 3 of 3 # 02250.00 I I � C. Shand et al �1 ASTRONOMIC I I I 0570-01225 PROPOSED 3-WAY iO' R BIT. TYPICAL TRIPLEX I CONC. L. REG PATH ,r. - �� BUILDING STOP INTERSECTION _ 20' Recr�atLona_1 Easemenj . GRAPHIC SCALE T. and L. Kleh - _- - - —� - - "— _ Open Space ? D N ,� 2w M. and M. Scollins I 1160-00219 Pinnacle at Spear E. I 1160-00214 \ SINGLE FAMILY HOME PRIVATE DRIVE ) pUB-1c ST/7E - °U non. ON FOOTPRINT LOT.- WIDE P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot 1645-00089 rn CONC. REG- .�, _ VALE K- • - SPEED TABLE c� `_ y •' T D�JV - _ • •. . ` - arks ers p -- 6 Z S / 1742- 00033 VALE DRIVE o o ••• j ..� Boo CEL 4 -- , PAR - C' *DEBIT. °'O U ATER AREA C co°NNGrnETkOE CURB �s • I ,p c m o STOR W W I, I Qm I .ce1ergm� 1 II _ ;•.'.'.'.'•;•.O•,•,;';'.'- 1+€Ao m TYPICAL DUPLEX 40-1Inc. pr Meadows, - — — • * L ;:�;,. • ;. ;. ;,.�... • .. •, •, •�J. •. y BUILDING :� �.. •� ��:��.-� -- •�I-• �. �.'.'. 4$ A+� •,�,'. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY IV WIDE BIT. �� �. ' `'. .'• ,•, •) WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS �-- CONC. ROAD W/ CONCRETE CURB j !i • 'y -\ "'^� \ i'!•.'J... �. j� EXISTING LOT 1 UNIT I — - • •• PUBLIC PARKING �•�` '•'.;.: . SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 2 UNITS _ • TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY HOME -^ '..' .' • � SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 15 UNITS ' ' ••••• / / ./ (FOOTPRINT LOTS) OPEN SPAM _ _ _ _ --_ TO COMMUNITY GARDENS DUPLEX UNITS 26 UNITS TRIPLEX UNITS 9 UNITS I / f '� NEW 24' WIDE BIT. 1 r PRIVATE DRIVE C�,E aRL V� . and M. Gilbert OPEN SPACE TOTAL 53 UNITS I ''- s4o-olaoo SING!L - I PINNACLE AT SPEAR _ _ FAMII YIul / SINGLE i a FAMILY _ LOT � PROPOSED ZONING BOUNDARY PUBLIC PARK I RESTRICTED AREA �__ • • I - K. SAWTELLE I _ -- - LOT 1 -77 O —NEW 25WIDE BIT, 13rJO SPEAR LLC i I _ _ ip �w I CONIC. ROAD W/ CONCRETE cues 1640 -01350 ••� ii I • �� �144 F I' Ek (yam,•-, '% _ / I , - ' - - - C.ID. Muhr L. and D. Ymungl -- 1640-01408 M. Dencker ` 1640- 4p • 1640-01430 • C, _ , \ G. artdJ.-Farre�7r �`i/% 01lR�land T arra t ' 2 �\ ` Volume 142, Pagesd / i I L 11 40-01404 12.9 acres j r / i C. and B. Marroquin I and C. Franzonl 1640-01408 1640-01295 E ' SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET\ NEW T P�S�CTED To MATa � , _ I I I 1 1 1 R. and T. Avonda I E%. RaAD sTnucmRAE SEGi�DN I I I 1640-01317 E),M1 .SMH SKETCH PLAN INV�385.41 I Lavi ne I TRF _ I I , I I " I ; SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 I R. and E. E_ I I I I I I I I 11 1 -- -� __— ASTRONONIC I M. and M. Scollins 1 1160-00214 GRAPHIC SCALE I 30 BO 1. 240 ^iee SINGLE FAMILY HOME ID' WDE PAVED vAn+ I ON FOOTPRINT LOT P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot�,�, x 1645-00089 �— uoiBuiiin0 •oS jo �4!, 910Z 9 1 AON Cn o0 U cO Uf � c Q� SUMMARY OF HOUSING UNITS EXISTING LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (FOOTPRINT LOTS) TRIPLEX FLATS TRIPLEX TOWNHOUSES TOTAL 1 UNIT '"—pARCEL 4 STORM WATER 14 UNITS _ 18 UNITS OPEN SPACE 18 UNrrS 51 UNITS I / 36 � 37 / 38 /I K. SAWTELLE 1640-01300 / I_ — 39 1 ` --- -- ------- VALE DRIVE - 118 17 i 16 21 19 I 1 _ © -- n TYPICAL TRIPLEX NEW CROSSWALK AT FLATS m CURB BUMPOUTS 1 _ _ Spear Meadows, Inc. — — — — — — — 18 �' 1640-1340 — i 32 30 1 TYPICAL TRIPLEX nRIVE — TOWNHOUSE • W. and M. Gilbert 6' 35 ® 33 1640-01400 .NEW 26' WIDE BIT. 1 �_ CONIC. ROAD W/- CONCRETE CURB - — LOT 1 T _ . - 1350 SPEAR LLC 40 1640-01350 G. Farrell • , L o j1-0 0 � 0` C. and B. Marroquin 1640-01295 I I 0 M1302, / `j R. and T. Avonda 1640-01317 I r 0, 1�kG. andJ-Farrell '"Volume 142, Page345-47 ±2.9 acres Zz / i NEW SPEAR STiEE\ PAVEMENT D WIENMO \ \ I �gOAD TRuC STRUCNAAIIRAL CT. I /� I — SP R. and E. Lavigne C. Shand et al 0570-01225 10' WIDE PAYED PATH T. and L. Kleh - t 1160-00219 _ - 5- WIDE SIDEWALK 16' Open Space e Pinnacle at Spear VALE DF�IVE PROPOSED /. O PUBLIC PARK /!1' :; �� Larkin/Milot Partnership (1.4 AC.) P 1742-00033 I I Q`oa- [NEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS 4 Z p RECEIVED I ,�•, -1 .o�m --'" • ' ' • ' Q NOV 1 6 2015 �` i •O •�IAPPED•CL'A.IF .•flO, m o'"�SSo City of So. Burlington, + OPEN SPACE •.' • - "� WETLANDS DELINEATED BY `' • ' .t WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN 4l l t — TYPICAL j 45 � pRN 46 47 TOWNHOUSE TRIPLEX ATF�Ri� 4e I OPEN SPACE PINNACLE AT SPEAR " 50 / r • .I I • 1 / L � / II � I �� III I 1 J `�- I I I I II D. Muhr , L. and D. Youngs I--� 1640-01408 M. Dencker / 1640-011402 j I 1640-01430 R. and arrant. T/ I / � I r- I I 1040-01404 I I 1 I I I q. and C. Franzoni 1640-01406 I ; SPEAR MEADOWS SKETCH PLAN I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I NOVEMBER 15' 2015 SITE ENGINEER: M. and M. Scollins 1160-00214 C. Shand et al CONCRETE I P.B. Grabowski and J. L. Milot T. and L. Kleh 0-01225 AS21j?ONjf1c 1645-00089 1160-00219 E: GONG. ROAD W/ I40yP WIDE 26' WDE BIT. WDE CONC. 10, VA -CO COHO. RED. PATH N . ROM W/ SIDEWALK . . . ............. �LRB DE 81 Ct. CONC. REC. CONCRETE Civil ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC - x jos _R-C 6 ---------------------------- 10UWFIELDWENLAVESOUTHBURUNG 170540 ------------ ------------- 7 AA SINGLE— ----------- ------------ ---- FAX M41�nll Open Space ------------- '____FA i 1 , i ----------- MILY UNITS, Pinnacle at Spear 139471.7'SF i ---------- -- &20 Ac�. ACL -------------- . "m - ------------ ---------- ---------- L --------- GOING. - ------- SAV ----------- ------- --------- --------- SIDEWALK APPROVED r SAV PROJECT: PARCEL LajMilot Partnership 000 SPEAR PROPOSED z --&. . 1742-00033 650- PARCEL e'o --- --------- --- - --- P. MEADOWS c', PUBLIC PARK 0 Cal0 STORM WATER AREA 68715.2 SF 1.58 A- 35561.1 SF U? 0.82 Acm :0I SPEAR STREET S - - --------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ARCEL5 20' VADE BIT. VERMONT DETENTION - ---------- CONIC. ROAD . . . BASIN j'q'RViTS . 9 SF -- -- ----------------------- 2.87 Ac— � \ PARCEL9 . . . 77398.6 SF spear Meadows, Inc. 1,711 Acre, 1_407�4()� . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19 WIDE MT. . . . . . . . ... .4% O= ROAD-W/ - -?DN?Ey.CUR! L.06 -WETLANDS -PARCEL 2 ......... VA . RCEL f0_ 851INrpLE -------- 7 34261.2 SF 0.79 Tc— �T,,"DE M FAMIkY VNITS RED. PATH ------- -- 84110.1,,SF0 LEGEND 1. 21 A� fS ...Sudingtot, -NEW W WIDE WT. _N PROPERTY LINE E)USTING CONTOUR ---------------- BUILDING SETBACK WETLAND (12 WEILAND BUFFER 59 —SS— GRAVITY SEVER LINE ----------- ----------- ------ W. and M. Gilbert —FM— FORCE MAIN 1640-01400 — W — WATER LINE 43565.5 SF OE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC '0ry ---- / ���j " / i © , L--'- 1' ' 63787.5 SF 1.00 Acm —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 1.46 AAcres-- -- -- —UT— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE G — GAS LINE E ---- ----- 1G. arrek/ ST— STORM DRANAGE UNIE 0C.01 GRAVITY SEWER CL.EANOUT 1640-01,37 (3) SEWER MANHOLE ----------- 11 7 Open Space -------- Pinnacle at Spear Q) III) STORM MANHOLE ------------------------ Vl� V U HYDRANT BIT. (D LOT 1 SNUT C."AG,% ..1E&. SF 1350 SPEAR LLC 2,07 A� CATCH BASIN POWER POLE 1640-01350I•/�\v//`/ ;' / ;'/ / ,ice \� EDGE OF WOODS -7 0 TRANSFORMER CABINET WSION III 62157.8 SF 1.43 A.— 6.30.14 ACL DR _j I % / I / I \" -`- B"'B'B PMA' 4- L2.7.14 1L_ D—M.' LE� B. L and D. t�ung L I r- j 95 1640-01j1402 1 1 1 D. Muhr 11 rrj 1640-01408 I, R and T M. Dencker L, Vlarrant' NEW SPEAR STREET 1640-014. R. and T. A PAVEMENT VWADENING z4_' // 1 11 SITE PLAN vonda CON DIED TO MATCH 1k40-01404 TOTAL UNIT COUNT 1640-01317 EX. ROAD STRUCTURAL SECIION and C. Franzoni 21 - 7 TRIPLEX BUILDING '4'-01406 7- - 6 3 DUPLEX BUILDINGS R and T. ttl DAM F 54 TOTAL UNIT R. and E. Lavigne 27 - SINGLE FAMILY LOTS 1640-01331 1 Cimmone g Z-:,- 1640-01393 ttl MAY., 2014 Ir GRA�HIC SCALE/ seal 0 T I T 1'.so' C1.1 PROD. NO. IN FEET 02250 ii?,h = 60 1 BUM ANDERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL Mr. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vennont 05402.0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Far. 802 862.8176 wwlvvtlawl.com March 11, 2015 Re: Snyder Homes Sketch Plan Application # SD -14-37 (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd.) Dear Chairman Barritt: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced matter for William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group"). I was not able to attend the January 20th DRB sketch meeting on the above -referenced matter, but I understand from my clients that the topic of Transferable Development Rights (TDR's) came up, and that the Neighbors Group offered to send the DRB a letter on the subject, as well as other matters related to the proposed project. I would be grateful if you would accept this letter as part of that submission and include it in the packet of materials for the DRB's March 17th meeting. The Applicant seeks DRB approval for as many as twenty-two TDR-based units of density in order to add to the property's allowable base density of thirty-one units, for a maximum of fifty-three units. The Neighbors Group continues to maintain that the TDR bylaw contained within the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) is unenforceable because it fails to comply with State law — specifically 24 V.S.A. § 4423 — and because it is unconstitutionally void for vagueness under the standards set out in the Vermont Supreme Court case of In re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC, 2008 VT 110, 185 Vt. 201, 969 A.2d 47. On the subject of TDR's, the Applicant failed to respond to Question 9b on the Sketch Plan Application form as to the location, including street address, from which the TDR's would be transferred. As such, the Neighbors Group submits that the DRB should await receipt of such information before proceeding further on the Application. (In that connection, the Applicant also DRB Chair Tim Barritt March 11, 2015 Page 2 of 2 BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONIvi,c failed to state any legal interest in the real estate that is the subject of the Application, as is required in response to Application Question 4.) I am advised that, during the January 20th sketch meeting, the DRB indicated that it might consider consulting with the City Attorney regarding the implementation and interpretation of the City's TDR bylaw. The Neighbors Group welcomes such an inquiry and I would request that the DRB allow the undersigned and Neighbors Group member and retired lawyer Mr. William A. Gilbert to participate in such a discussion with the City Attorney and/or the DRB. I note that the Applicant has requested to meet with various City officials as part of the Application's preparation and in response to the DRB's concerns. Therefore, I request respectfully that Mr. Gilbert and I be included as part of any similar review of the TDR issue. I understand that the DRB raised several other issues during the January 20th sketch meeting that require additional information and a further response from the Applicant. The Neighbors Group reserves comment on these matters and requests the opportunity to comment after the Applicant provides the DRB with additional information and/or a further response. A substantial portion of the Planning and Zoning Staff comments that the DRB reviewed during the January 20th sketch meeting would not exist or would be ameliorated substantially if the project's density were reduced. For example, block lengths, road crossings, traffic impact, interrupted sidewalks and safety issues, recreation path locations, adequacy of community garden space in the planned very dense central portion of the project, ingress, egress, turnaround space, garage and parking location. Under these circumstances, the Neighbors Group suggests respectfully that the best course of action would be for the DRB to direct the Applicant to revise the project's design to a lower and more reasonable and realistic density (rather than trying to mold the requested permit to allow excess TDR-based density). On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB members for their consideration and courtesies. Respectfully Submitted, Z���//Yl Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Cathyann LaRose, AICP, City Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) BUM ANDERSON MELLONIPLC Counsellors at Law VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL Mr. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax: 802 862.8176 w-"w.vtlawl.com March 11, 2015 Re: Snyder Homes Sketch Plan Application # SD -14-37 (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd.) Dear Chairman Barritt: I serve as counsel in connection with the above -referenced matter for William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group"). I was not able to attend the January 20th DRB sketch meeting on the above -referenced matter, but I understand from my clients that the topic of Transferable Development Rights (TDR's) came up, and that the Neighbors Group offered to send the DRB a letter on the subject, as well as other matters related to the proposed project. I would be grateful if you would accept this letter as part of that submission and include it in the packet of materials for the DRB's March 17th meeting. The Applicant seeks DRB approval for as many as twenty-two TDR-based units of density in order to add to the property's allowable base density of thirty-one units, for a maximum of fifty-three units. The Neighbors Group continues to maintain that the TDR bylaw contained within the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) is unenforceable because it fails to comply with State law — specifically 24 V.S.A. § 4423 — and because it is unconstitutionally void for vagueness under the standards set out in the Vermont Supreme Court case of In re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC, 2008 VT 110, 185 Vt. 201, 969 A.2d 47. On the subject of TDR's, the Applicant failed to respond to Question 9b on the Sketch Plan Application form as to the location, including street address, from which the TDR's would be transferred. As such, the Neighbors Group submits that the DRB should await receipt of such information before proceeding further on the Application. (In that connection, the Applicant also DRB Chair Tim Barritt March 11, 2015 Page 2 of 2 BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONIi>t-,: failed to state any legal interest in the real estate that is the subject of the Application, as is required in response to Application Question 4.) I am advised that, during the January 20th sketch meeting, the DRB indicated that it might consider consulting with the City Attorney regarding the implementation and interpretation of the City's TDR bylaw. The Neighbors Group welcomes such an inquiry and I would request that the DRB allow the undersigned and Neighbors Group member and retired lawyer Mr. William A. Gilbert to participate in such a discussion with the City Attorney and/or the DRB. I note that the Applicant has requested to meet with various City officials as part of the Application's preparation and in response to the DRB's concerns. Therefore, I request respectfully that Mr. Gilbert and I be included as part of any similar review of the TDR issue. I understand that the DRB raised several other issues during the January 20th sketch meeting that require additional information and a further response from the Applicant. The Neighbors Group reserves comment on these matters and requests the opportunity to comment after the Applicant provides the DRB with additional information and/or a further response. A substantial portion of the Planning and Zoning Staff comments that the DRB reviewed during the January 20th sketch meeting would not exist or would be ameliorated substantially if the project's density were reduced. For example, block lengths, road crossings, traffic impact, interrupted sidewalks and safety issues, recreation path locations, adequacy of community garden space in the planned very dense central portion of the project, ingress, egress, turnaround space, garage and parking location. Under these circumstances, the Neighbors Group suggests respectfully that the best course of action would be for the DRB to direct the Applicant to revise the project's design to a lower and more reasonable and realistic density (rather than trying to mold the requested permit to allow excess TDR-based density). On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB members for their consideration and courtesies. Respectfully Submitted, Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Cathyann LaRose, AICP, City Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) ray From: Eric Farrell <efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:16 AM To: ray Subject: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, I hereby withdraw my application, so that Chris Snyder can go forward with a new Sketch Plan application. Please confirm that this communication is sufficient for your purposes. Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "Prosperity means a healthy, peacefullife witAgood relationships and enough resources to be able to be a Blessing to others." -,Joel Qsteen 1 vEFRMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Public Drinldng Water and Groundwater Protection Division Essex Regional Office 11i West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov September 12, 2014 Judith L. Zullo, Esquire Doremus Kantor & Zullo PO Box 445 Burlington, VT 054O2-0445 Dear Judith: Agency of Natural Resources [phone] 802-879-5656 [fax] 802-879-3871 Subject: Boundary line adjustments with Spear Meadows, Inc., Richard E. Tarrant, Jr. and Tracy A. Tarrant, and Douglas and Christine Franzoni, located off Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont. I am writing in response to your letter dated September 4, 2014 requesting a determination as to whether or not a permit is needed for the above referenced boundary line adjustments. It is my understanding that Spear Meadows, Inc. owns a 22 +/- acre undeveloped parcel and is proposing to convey o.16 acres to Doug and Christine Franzoni and convey o.o8 acres to the Tarrants. The portions to be conveyed will be merged with the Franzoni and Tarrant existing parcels. The Franzoni and Tarrant parcels are previously developed (prior to 1/1/07) with single family residences served by existing municipal water and sewer services. The boundary line adjustments as shown on the plan entitled "Plat of Boundary Line Adjustment, Lands of Spear Meadows, Inc., R & T Tarrant, D & C Franzoni, 1340 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont" dated January 25, 2011 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Based on the information submitted to the Wastewater Management Division, it appears that the above referenced project qualifies for an exemption under Section 1-304(a)(11) of The Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective —September 29, 2007. We recommend that the landowners record a copy of this determination in the South Burlington Land Records. In issuing this opinion the Regional Office Program of the Division has relied solely upon the information submitted to us and the landowner is responsible for its accuracy. Should it be determined in the future that the facts were not as stated; this letter will not prevent the Agency from taldng appropriate enforcement action. Sincerely, Jessanne Wyman Regional Engineer Enclosure C City of South Burlington �MW Regional Offices — Barre/EssexJct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable eater Supply Rules §1-304 Exemptions (a) The following are exempt from the permitting requirements of this Subchapter provided the specified conditions are met (Note: more than one exemption may apply in a particular situation)... (11) boundary line adjustments that affect either improved or unimproved lots provided that: (A) each lot being adjusted meets one or more of the following standards: (i) a lot being reduced in size is being reduced by no more than two percent; (ii) a lot is increased in size; (iii) the boundary line being adjusted is located, after adjustment, at least 500 feet from the footprint of the building or structure on an improved lot; or (iv) the Secretary, on a case by case basis, makes a written determination that the proposed adjustment will not have an adverse effect on any existing potable water supply or wastewater system on the affected lots. (B) a diagram is submitted to the Secretary that shows the existing and revised lot boundaries; and (C) a copy of the diagram and, if applicable the Secretary's written determination, is recorded and indexed in the land records for the municipality where the lots are located by the landowner. Note 1: Boundary line adjustments that were done pursuant to the prior version of this exemption (sections 1- 403(a)(12) or 1-404(a)(4) of the January 1, 2005 version of these Rules) remain exempt so long as the diagram and Secretary's determination are recorded and indexed in the land records for the municipality where the lots are located. Note 2: Case by case determinations under subdivision(A)(iv) of this exemption will require the submission of a diagram of the lots that shows the locations of all existing, and permitted but not yet built, potable water supplies and wastewater systems. BURR A DERSON M MELLONIPLG Counsellors at Law VIA FAX: 802-846-4101 Mr. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402.0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax: 802 862.8176 H-A1vvtlaw1.com September 2, 2014 Re: Master Plan Application #MP-11-03 and Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-51 of Farrell Real Estate-, (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd.) Dear Chairman Barritt: I serve as counsel for William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street (the "Gilberts"), Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above -referenced matters (the "Client Group"). I write on behalf of the Client Group to request respectfully that tonight's DRB meeting regarding Spear Meadows be cancelled. On Friday, August 31, 2014, at approximately 6:38 PM (i.e., less than one business day ago), Director of Planning and Zoning Paul Conner e-mailed to the public an Agenda for tonight's DRB meeting. Item #3 on the Agenda states as follows: Continued master plan application #MP-11-03 & preliminary plat application #SD-11-51 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists o£ 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 24 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 21 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear St. The September 2nd DRB meeting packet available on the City's web site includes an August 29, 2014 Memorandum to the DRB from Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Dan Albrecht concerning Agenda Item #3 (the "Memorandum"). The Memorandum — the subject line of which references the same two docket numbers as Agenda Item #3 — states in pertinent part: "It should be noted that the plan materials submitted this week do not match the agenda description...." Id. at 1 (emphasis added). The Memorandum goes on to state that: Letter to DRB Chairman Tim Barritt September 2, 2014 Page 2 of 2 BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONIpu., The applicant would like cursory feedback on several substantial changes to the plan. These changes include, but are not limited to, a reduction to 55 total units, a re -located park, and various changes in the distribution of units and lot layouts throughout the various parcels that comprise the proposed development. A full review of the plans will be provided after such time as these major issues can be addressed. Id. (emphasis added). Clearly, the plan materials submitted for tonight's DRB meeting concern a new and different potential plan and do not concern the docket numbers listed in Agenda Item #3 (and in the Memorandum's subject line). In short, the applicant did not serve notice of tonight's DRB meeting to the abutters of the new potential plan described in the latest plan materials. In essence, the applicant is attempting to use a late -announced DRB meeting concerning a superseded 2011 master plan/preliminary plat application to have a DRB meeting on a new potential sketch plan. The Client Group is not aware of a regulation or procedure that would entitle an applicant to seek "cursory feedback" from the DRB concerning a potential sketch plan application that has not been docketed or warned to the public. In sum, the Client Group submits respectfully that tonight's DRB meeting is neither a properly noticed/warned meeting regarding the above -referenced matters or regarding the new potential sketch plan application on which the applicant has suddenly requested "cursory feedback." Therefore, the Client Group requests respectfully that tonight's DRB meeting regarding Spear Meadows be cancelled. Finally, I would be grateful if you or Mr. Conner would distribute copies of this letter to the DRB membership. I will plan to bring paper copies tonight for all DRB members in the event the meeting is not cancelled before I need to leave my office for the meeting. Thanks very much. Respectfully submitted, Daniel A. Seff cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert H. Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) o ,� IRWIN 9�11 southburlimton PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer & Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht RE: Agenda #3, Farrell Real Estate Continued master plan application 4MP-11-03 and Continued preliminary plat application 4SD-11-51 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street DATE: August 29, 2014 Continued Master plan application #MP-11-03 & preliminary plat application #SD-11-51 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 24 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 21 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear St. This memo serves to highlight various issues of concern raised by staff on the current proposal. The application has been discussed at several hearings since its inception in 2011. This memo is only a cursory review of new items and not intended to be a full review, which will follow. It should be noted that the plan materials submitted this week do not match the agenda description included above. The applicant would like cursory feedback on several substantial changes to the plan. These changes include, but are not limited to, a reduction to 55 total units, a re -located park, and various changes in the distribution of units and lot layouts throughout the various parcels that comprise the proposed development. A full review of the plans will be provided after such time as these major issues can be addressed. Parcel 8, Proposed Public Park, Parcel 7 and Recreation Path The proposed park has been discussed at prior hearings. Section 9 of the SBLDR states that "a range of parks should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation." Furthermore, "parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program" and "a neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one -quarter mile walk of every home not so 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned recreation area." Planning & Zoning staff discussed the proposal with Recreation & Park staff and have the following concerns about the proposed park. The overall size of the park is now proposed at approximately 1.5 acres which is significantly smaller than the 3.05 acre park presented at the proposal's last hearing in February 2013. Given that this will be the first public park in this area of the City and serve both the proposed development and surrounding neighborhoods, the Board and the applicant should discuss the park in detail. Staff is concerned about the reduction in size of the park given that the 3.05 acre size was larger than required and was viewed favorably as a way to mitigate the impacts of some of the proposed waivers requested by the applicant. There are no longer any community gardens depicted on the plan. The LDRs (Section 9.06)C) state: C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community -supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. Given that there are 24 units in duplexes or triplexes and therefore limited yard space for owners, a community garden space is highly desirable. Should the applicant remove the housing units at Parcel 7, a portion of that parcel being used for gardens would make sense especially given its proximity to the park. Staff notes that the location of the proposed extension of the recreation path now crosses in front of the 15 single family homes along Vale Drive instead of along the rear edges of the parcel. As each of the homes will have a separate driveway (and potentially front walkways as well), this will create numerous sites of potential accidents between homeowner households and path users. In addition to relocating a portion of the path to the rear of the parcel as previously proposed, staff suggest that another option to explore would be locating the recreation path (or a portion thereof) along the western edge of Parcel 5. Finally, the presence of two housing units at Parcel 7 immediately adjacent to the park is problematic as this could lead to conflict over perceived excessive noise. Should applicant wish to retain the units, staff suggests that these units be located on Parcel 6, lot #16 or that the private drive to Parcel 9 be moved to the east so as to create a boundary between the park and nearby housing units. 1. Staff understands that this level of review is not yet complete and these details should be largely worked out prior to any decision on the preliminary plat application. The applicant has begun discussions with the Director of the Recreation Department and with the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee and these should continue to as the application evolves. The Director and the applicant should address which facilities shall be planned for the space (ie- basketball courts, play structures, etc), as well as parking needs. Private Drive to Parcel 9 and Parcel 2 street The plans have been revised to include five single family homes to be accessed via a narrow private road which crosses a wetland and eight single family homes on a dead end public street. The South Burlington Land Development Regulations allow for 3 homes on a private road. However, the applicant should work with the Director of Public Works and Fire Department to determine the needs for access and turn -around to these lots, as well as the details for the road construction. Subsection 9.08(A)(2)(b) notes that "(d)ead end streets (e.g. culs-de-sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length." The proposed private drive servicing Parcel 9 is nearly 600 hundred feet long and is also a cul-de-sac while the proposed public street on Parcel 2 is effectively a cul-de-sac and is over 300 feet long. 2. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the proposal to meet the standards regarding both the number of single homes on a private road Parcel 1 The plans depict a multi -unit building along the western edge of the parcel. As currently shown, the building is oriented to the proposed new street, as opposed to facing Spear Street. The proposed setback of the building approximates those of abutting properties on Spear Street. 3. Staff recommends that the Board discuss this issue with the applicant and provide guidance on the orientation of the building. List of Waivers 4. Given that the Board has several new members and the proposal has changed over the last few years, staff recommends that the applicant provide an updated list of waivers. Number of Units/Density/Lot Layout/Transferred Development Rights: Based upon Site Location Plan C1.0, dated May 2014 and revised on June 30, 2014, the applicant appears to be proposing a total of 55 units distributed as follows: Lot 1 1 unit Existing SF home to remain Parcel 1 8 units 1-duplex, 2-triplexes Parcel 2 8 units 8-SF homes Parcel 5 16 units 2-duplexes, 4-triplexes Parcel 6 15 units 15-SF homes Parcel 7 2 units 1-duplex Parcel 9 5 units 5-SF homes The base density of the parcel generated by the land at 1.2 units per acre, based on 25.91 acres, is 31 units. The maximum units allowed, in accordance with Chapter 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and determined by the Neighborhood residential sub -district under the Transferred Development Right program, are 103 units. The applicant is proposing 54 new units, with one existing dwelling to be razed and one to remain, for a total of 55 units within the PUD. This is a proposed density of approximately 2.1 units per acre. A total of 24 transferred development rights would be required. The applicant has stated that they have a legal option to purchase enough development rights to build the project as proposed. Staff has previously recommended that the Board require the applicant to submit the legal documents pertaining to the options for review by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. Staff has also recommended that the development rights be purchased by the applicant prior to issuance of zoning permits for any units beyond the 31 allowed by the property's inherent density. 5. The Board did not previously raise issues with these recommendations regarding timing of transferred development rights. However, they should determine at this stage whether they shall be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval or prior to final plat approval. a. Staff recommends that the applicant submit legal documents pertaining to the options to purchase Transferred Development Rights (TDRs) to the City Attorney for approval, at a time determined by the Board. b. Staff recommends that the applicant submit legal documents showing clear ownership of the 25 development rights to the City Attorney for approval, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the 32nd unit. Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-861-3000 fax 802-861-3003 To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer From: Eric Farrell �.. Date: 5/3/13 Re: Spear Meadows, 1340 —1350 Spear Street Please find attached a revised Overall Concept Plan that I plan to present to the DRB on May 21st for the purpose of seeking their feedback one last time, before completing the Preliminary Plat engineering work: Densi This conceptual plan depicts a total of 52 dwelling, as follows: • 1 existing single-family home = 1 unit 7 new single-family lots = 7 units 16 new single-family homes = 15 units 14 new duplexes = 28 units E3..k1:- 0-,. I met with the recreation Path Committee., but have not received any comments about what they would like me to do or not do in the public park. Hopefully, we'll have their comments before the meeting. Attachments 1 .� „// % . ,// , „/, ., -, „/r .� // / // ir. • %yLr �/' //,/,��/L// //y r//� � ///,�� //,/�� ���//y��///// //y'//y�� /� ////,��///y�i,/y//yam //// ///�� ///��� // //y� r///�,,�//yam //y //y ////iii /i" , //„// y�//L�,� //,/y„ //y�'y�///,r� //,�,� �� //L//� ///, y' // O Z/iy "/i,/ i/,/'//„j j ///,'�i„// „' ,� j,,/'//,/ j� //i //„// // jijy//,��� /// //„j //„y',r/j ///,,j /i/y�ij/'///�/j ///,i„��//i',i,'%j'"/,�"•y// ij'' /""/ y""//,"'////�' / i/y'"/i// /// /i,/�///L�j/�i r//iy'"// r//, ///„ Ll'',�y�'/ "'//r, /� , O / rii � "/iij, /i,Nr/ /%/i„�� /ii,/'y' L,/,yti/ii/„ y/ i ✓i,�iiyy�Liijiiy�iy,� /iir /iii��"//ii%'"/i,��� /ii /iy�� rUy�/i�'iii,�� riy� jy�/i,L,� Lid /iyr� /iiii,� �"'/iij � rii; Pug AAn ,"';,y„y,,;o,;U,r,,;'/,,,,y;/,yy/ r "'/ii r ri, /ii'y, /, •Oi/iii' /if ��'"y /i/j'iri /i�'i j�' ii,�y'//yi��� rii�� /ii'y//i i'yiir'r"y/iii'iri�,yiiiijj,/i/��ii/i„ir'"//i ir' ri,�' / ry,� / r riii //i "iii'/ ri , /i,�' /i /i /i ri /i y �j/ /i / / •(r„1 / / / ri / /i /i d'i /i y,/rr iiirj'iiy/i,�'iiyy/ii'"/U""/U , , / ri >yii,'/ `ii fy yj'/ /a1„y�'iryr /iyy✓i iiy/,�yyriiy„�/i /i,��/iy,�/ii/iyy/iyiii�'//i/i�/it,�'iiiL/�iiii,,//ii�ii,"y/ii U/r�yii'iiii / ''i'� U�,L,� y,,, /iy„ / /iy/, / ,//Uy/ /iiS� yy'/y�' //o i�� /iy��/ii2 / y/////yam'////% /i o iii r°� 'r /ii /i, /i /i'ii ,/�''' rror /i, ri / "//i' /'ri "/y''' //''"/iij ""//ii" U/iii„r/�/�iiorr� J y, ,��/i�iijj'/iii�''iiiir�/. ��. rr, 'ir„/r /,, o ,'roi i, ., �� � "/r oN�r��,/• Z iiyy / /iyi%. �.' ri•,r,,,,//i„r/„//r,,,,,/ifiip '//ii i "/i,.�'iii /i Liy, � /iy /i 4l /iy/,,/ /iyr/ ,�� /iriii "/L i /ii /i„/i ry ri, //ii /ir r N //ii /i , /l✓, l ,i„ /iy/iy /iyr,/ii /ii '//ii iy'iiy,/i , riyij'/ii i'"iiy'iijry/r y /,'"//�•'l '�////v,,,�% l"Yjy'i,�'/,�y''///iU//,�'/////i//yam'//yir ,y//y' ///y// ///'//y�jy''///„/ / ,1y", ��////L%,���/// /i rA✓, n , ! /i ri, /,/ /i, /yr {• /ii //i / rri /i /i / r r /i ' / r / / r / /i r / / /r /i r r / ��y''/iiy'� "" r/i, yi "' Or' 1/,j / //,j ///,/, ///, /i/r,,,/ Li,,, /i, / /i �i /i /�i r •fA/i /i /i /ir U //LL /i rii //ir r r Nir /ii r, / / /i co O Vi ' '/C,Q" � ' l//ir± //'✓rii"i'r�i i''i//i/y„//��iiy,��/iiiy�/iyp'/ri�/iy/�/iry'�j�r/iij��/ii/ip�r/ii�,,� /i,�,/iji%/i„ii""/'yii'"iri��/iy���iry�r�'/iiy���/iii����/ii, 'ir,rr< i��4i%�r��/4j��'iiGijj�4 04 I �� (,"iij�'y, lii,�'/iiii �'/i,•/y ��iiioyr�iiy�/�r�iiy� �/iiq i� �/iiiLi„ice ri,�'//ir,� �/iiy,�/iiii n7,'�/L/iy'�'yii'iij,�/iy�,r� /iij y'//i�/iy��//iiy�y,�'iiy�'ii,/��,��/iy,� /e - ' i �ii� � /irr ririij iiii :�r� �/iij'/y,/i///tT� ✓/irj,�j,1 /riy, /'/ir/i, "r ir/ /r/,/,j I (; •F'��',/iiiij'yii �� /ii„�� ��/iiy��/i„U/���/iiy�'ii�/iiy��iiy,� „'/i,/r� i/ii'i/�� //U �iiii iy� Liiiyr j,�riiy�/ij /i„y'iry,� /U//iy/� /iiyi�Uy"r/ii'" "'/ii'iiy� y,� riiy �iiG /ii„ �irfiii'i r'iiG /iij,, 4,,, 4j,,�'G� 'G i'iiG /iij, 71 /i / /i / r ri / ✓ r / / r / /i r /i / r�• / r p-/ r � �n r y r Li/i �i /'i yev / / TTt ✓i r ,� •// •V •� y , ,/, ?i, / /, /, r // / /// '// ' O /, '/ G //i / // G G �/ rri / / /�, ✓ /ei'/iy/,.'/ry ?•i%✓ rri, , 'rii/i,'rii'/iy/i "ii„ G !' /i/i„' /i t' Uj'/iG /i,,,rir//i/� G„ r� rrG /rr. �,r,��Gir',�L,/iii Gj e 1C / r /r,Jt / /i ri ri J'ii rii rri /t /i, / ' . <rii ri G'1•,, J y /y, ry, lii✓iyi "ri r, / ri /i,/ /i„ / rir '//i .9i {C(/�JiyU��(/�✓/ �,.�r�✓/�,�jy�� r// ////�/ir'y//y�' yyii'ij�'iU�i'r� jj//io j j/?,,/,j///i j p/� �/iy' jj� i'i��i/j �/i%ji � /'G,(•��j'G /G � j �'i%j/4/ � l �,{."iiG j j /L � �r�'Gir/Girj'G/,�� a /i,rir G ' t.. r/ri /^i /i ri•, r rii / / ri rii /i ?rill / 'rii //i /i rri d rri Li /i r' r' ' /i i r' Al " ' i ' /' /i i, / //r ,r r r ''' i .�/U / 'fir ✓ /, // �' r/ rii rr// //i/// //i r ,ik� rri / //i/ rir i G / ,✓r,,, �, ryf ' (• iy (fly ,ri/,/i Jqi/y/i,,,//��i„//✓/„//r,",,,j✓ uSi'i,//,''/�/i,Lr N �•i�GiY'T''L.+'i "Gi'r"''"' P rt , / , Riiy?ii""//iG/rii'ii E $ ri 'GG/GrG /d /i rrG ri„i/r/i r iN Y } ' U (ri /i / ✓/, // oy /, rr r//, /, riir rir rir G G/ /r, rr . G/i L /i, /„ / L /r rr /r / // �." � { � W W i — "/r/,,� //y, //y„/i/G✓'/riG /iG N'%i'/ ' ,�L/ , / rill, ///, / , % //, //N //i rir i G / /// rri/ �t Q • ! �'r • �. 1L1 "r1 'ri /„ /i, /iir rii rii' G' G irr/4 � Lr > it G r / i / � � r r / r / /i /i r / (n 1iy r 7//i f�rS/iijh�r✓fi, /i, �rL�/ G ri / rr r / —�? w /'�'9llt •Ni 4v '' %"rri'„T' ii'ii G /r, /ij r„ „ ' Q11Lr r �1 / �� I � � r / �j✓ 'n✓''rii/iNiG ii' 'y /iiii/ ire %' 'i�'i(, /lit 5Ji r, ii 't"in � i "/ i�n'l„�,/�•4s' /r rri /G r rry rii r 4 /•' / � %i,/ ri / G J li � / /i / /' d / ' .(✓✓ it ✓/'i r/ / ,/ L / '/rr /// / / �/ / N'NG✓✓ /' /' ('ts'%�/"/ A 7 y • 1 • • • • • • � ; • / � '�ii,G ��'G "/ / ` - G / G 4 "/ ' p' //,i'/%/v fir '"G /fG ✓i,,,4riY yG✓/z 0 /'G •(/i n'iir rir / h, * / / / / /r„ r y i G / /i /i �L/ rir G /L, /r //d ✓ i Gv, /ij /iJ, rii br a . �! rii rir G ' i'r/i rii , 4 ✓ rri n'ir rir G r 4„ n/ r''y r 1i'>YN G/i Gj' n. O N �4j Gir "e ' f/i ///i' it /i rrG 4i/,i /rr v ✓r ii% Ni G /!a /ry r / r / / �(j� � ► • - lU ' i i r '// liG .Ji'�ii'✓ii''ri'� r iG �G /i' �,vj /iii�rii r G G �� �Yei: "1 : • / �, /GJ /ij /, , / • /r / / / /i N yw �r t G /r, r ` � • �• • L` l---_--- -------- , � - _' _ _ / y r,,, /, G /i, Nir rir rir G G / Uj riir rir / r G G r rri ✓rii I •' • •�• • ti /'- -- - ----- lr„ � •�• r • • � / / , , r /i, rill rii rir G G / /i, ri,/ / / 6 \� �\, �. «• i �W. I� __ -_ -_ i Lr,/r,/r„rirrG i/' r ��' ' � � � • i `� a i -- C'�'''/'�„G� � O / / /i / J. m d LLI CD Lu _ I I I'' 1c , I ycWi ' �`N '' �� /-- Hu �Q'' Q' Oa 1 �: - / O d' N / / Ja w /t --- � 6 •-.5 9nZIgAv9J�urry .ate. b+P1d3:)NOJ wopwn/dS ZZ-po-uo *Aci omad 1-/ej\A>4ad —.P74d ray From: Eric Farrell <efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 3:16 PM To: ray Cc: Chris Snyder Subject: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, Per our telephone conversation, please ask the ORB to continue our presentation from the 7/15 meeting to either 8/19 (if available) or 9/2. Meanwhile, I'll drop off a check in the amount of $50. Many thanks, Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell(@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "Prosperity means a Aca1fAy, peaceful kfc witkgood relationskips and enougk resources to.ie able to die a blessing to otAcrs." -Joel Qsteen ray From: Eric Farrell <efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:07 PM To: ray Cc: Danielle Fisette Subject: RE: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, We are still working on some final details, so please extend our DRB meeting from May 20, 2014 to sometime in July. Dani, Please deliver a $50 check to Ray sometime tomorrow. Many thanks, Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "Prosperity means a healthy, peacefullife withgood relationships and enough resources to be able to be a Blessing to others."-,,foel Qsteen 1 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 TELEPHONE (802 660-2555) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802-660-2552) PATTI R. PAGE W W W.FIRMSPF.COM ROBERT E. FLETCHER JMCLEAN@FIRMSPF.COM JOSEPH S. MCLEAN AMANDA S.E.LAFFERTY JOHN H.KLESCH DINA L. ATWOOD March 12, 2014 Jacalyn Fletcher, Court Manager Vermont Superior Court, Environmental Division 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1 Barre, VT 05641-8701 DAVID W. RUGH* ERIC G. DERRY** DIANE M. SHERMAN *(ALSO ADMITTED IN MD) **(ALSO ADMITTED IN NH) Re: In Re: Spear Meadows, Inc., Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell 70-Unit PUD Application OMP-11-01 and #SD-11-07) Docket No. 172-12-11 Vtec Dear Jackie: Enclosed please find a fully executed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice for filing with the Court in relation to the above -referenced matter. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, x` r'' �� (",Joseph S. McLean JSM/gc Enclosure cc: Robert F. O'Neill, Esq. and Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Daniel A. Seff, Esq. James W. Barlow, Esq. SON14-006 (Spear Meadows -Farrell PUD) JSM to Court re Stip Dismiss with Predjudice 03-12-14 cor STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT IN RE: SPEAR MEADOWS, INC., GARY N. FARRELL AND JANE G. FARRELL 70-UNIT PUD APPLICATION (#MP-11-01 AND #SD-11-07) ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 172-12-11 Vtec STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by their respective attorneys and pursuant to Rule 4(a)(2) of the Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings and Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), that the above -captioned matter may be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs or disbursements to any of the parties hereto. Dated: Burlington, Vermont March 7, 2014 Robert . O'Neill, Esq. Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel & Shea PC 76 St. Paul Street, 71hh Floor, P. O. Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 (802) 658-0220 roneill@gravelshea.com rrushford@gravelshea.com For Appellant J Dated Dated: Burlington, Vermont March 7, 2014 Burlington, Vermont March 7, 2014 -2- Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. 171 Battery Street, P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 jmclean@firmspf.com For City of South Burlington Daniel A. Seff, Esq. Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC 30 Main Street, Suite 210, P.O. Box 787 Burlington, VT 05402-0787 (802) 862-0500 dseff@vtlawl.com For Interested Landowners ray From: Eric Farrell <efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 3:10 PM To: ray Subject: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, We are still working on some final details, so please extend our DRB meeting from February 4, 2014 to sometime in March. Many thanks, Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farreIIreaIestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 °Prosperity means a healthy, ocacefulli/e withgood relationships and enough resources to be able to be a Blessing to others. " -,Joel Qsteen 1 .) Page 1 of 3 ray From: Eric Farrell [efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 8:20 AM To: ray Cc: Danielle Fisette Subject: RE: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, We're closing in on our Preliminary/Final Plat documents, but need more time to complete. Therefore, please extend our review date one more time to early February, 2014 and let me know what the exact date will be. Dani will drop off a check for the $50 extension fee. Many thanks, Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "%'rosp"ity means a healthy,'peacefullife withgood relationships and enough resources to be agile to be a blessing to others. " -,Joel Qsteen From: Eric Farrell Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 10:22 AM To: 'ray' Subject: RE: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, Please continue our Preliminary Plan Review to the DRB's November 19, 2013 meeting date. Many thanks, Eric 11 /4/2013 Page 1 of 2 ray From: Eric Farrell [efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 10:22 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, Please continue our Preliminary Plan Review to the DRB's November 19, 2013 meeting date. Many thanks, Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "r,"Ferity means a kcalthy, Peaceful kfc withgood relationships and enough resources to be able to be a blessing to others. " -_Joel Qsteen From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 12:32 PM To: Eric Farrell Subject: RE: Spear Meadows I also need a written request to either 11/5 or 11/19. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitv.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all a -mail, a -mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. /f you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return entail. Thank you for your cooperation. 8/9/2013 Page 2 of 2 From: Eric Farrell[mailto:efarrell(�Ofarrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:23 AM To: ray Cc: Danielle Fisette Subject: Re: Spear Meadows Ray, Yes, sorry ... to sometime in November, you pick the date. Meanwhile, Dani will drop off a check for $50. Eric Sent from my iPhone On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:02 AM, "ray" <ra cr sburl.com> wrote: Hi Eric, Were you going to request a continuation for Spear Meadows? Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. /f you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. 8/9/2013 J Page 1 of 1 ray From: Eric Farrell [efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 4:37 PM To: ray Subject: Spear Meadows Hi Ray, I will be unable to make the April 16th DRB meeting, as I have a conflicting DRB meeting in Burlington that same night. Please continue my application into mid -May. Do your need a check for $50? Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 "%ro5perity means a healthy, PeaceIullife withgoodrelationshiPs and enough resources to be able to be a blessing to others." -,Joel Qsteen 3/6/2013 l gravel & s he a ATTORNEYS AT LAW 76 St Paul Street P.O. Boa 369 Burhng[on, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802 658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 w .gravelshea.com February 6, 2013 Writer's E-Mail: ronei I I(? gravelshca. coin Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager Vermont Superior Court Environmental Division 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1 Barre, VT 05641-8701 Re: In Re: Spear Meadows, Inc., Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell 70-Unit PUD Application (#MP-11-01 and #SD-11-07) Docket No. 172-12-11 Vtec 0Dear Jackie: Please advise the Court there was another DRB hearing last night. The DRB is on -board with the new plan but, at the request of the neighbors, tabled it until their next meeting on April 16th. The Court should also be aware that even if all parties agree with the new plan, it will still take a few more meetings after April 16th to get to a final approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, GRAVEL & SHEA PC �GEI V�cO Robert F. O'Neill RFO:Imd cc: Joseph S. McLean, Esq. FEB 0 S 2013 Daniel A. Seff, Esq. qGE & FLo No Text City of South Burlington 3/6/2013 Spear Meadows Continuation Application 3675 50.00 Farrell Real Estate Spear Meadows Continuation 50.00 RUSSELL D. BARR** JESSE M.GOLDFINE+ JENNIFER J. LAJOIE* DANIEL A. SEFF** ALLEN G.B. HORSLEY, OF COUNSEL# `* MEMBER VT AND NY BARS *MEMBER VT BAR +MEMBER VT, MA AND RI BARS #MEMBER VT AND MA BARS BARR & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 125 MOUNTAIN ROAD STOWE, VERMONT 05672 VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL TEL: (802) 253-6272 FAX: (802) 253.6055 www.barrlaw.com Ms. Jacalyn M. Fletcher, Court Manager Vermont Superior Court Environmental Division 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1 Barre, VT 05641-8701 February 13, 2013 NEW YORK OFFICE 100 PARK AVENUE SUITE 1600 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017 TEL: (212) 486-3910 FAX: (212) 486-7688 SCOTT L. KEYES, LAW CLERK Re: In re Spear Meadows, Inc., Gary N. Farrell and Jane G. Farrell 70-Unit PUD Application, Docket No. 172-12-11 Vtec Dear Ms. Fletcher: I represent Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maureen Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of 219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of South Burlington, in the above -referenced matter. I am writing to correct several inadvertent inaccuracies in the February 6, 2013 letter from Appellants' counsel, Robert F. O'Neill, Esq. Mr. O'Neill, who was not at the February 5, 2013 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting, stated that the DRB is "on -board with the new plan." In actuality, there was no vote at the February 5th DRB meeting, and not all of the DRB members spoke. Of those that did speak, at least one DRB member expressed reservations and concerns about certain aspects of the new plan, as well as certain plan details that have yet to be revealed. In short, the DRB is not "on -board" with the new plan. Second, Mr. O'Neill stated that the matter was tabled "at the request of the neighbors" -- i.e., my above -listed clients -- until the DRB's "next meeting on April 16th." In fact, it was the Applicant himself who requested that the matter be adjourned until April 16th, and he did so at least in part because he has more work to do on his latest concept plan. Finally, for the sake of complete accuracy, the DRB meets twice a month and will have several meetings between now and April 16th. Thanks very much. Respectfully submitted, Daniel A. Seff cc: Robert F. O'Neill, Esq. (via First -Class Mail) o.in_ Michael & Mary Scollins <mscollins2CDmyfairpoint.neb Sr.9`a$ec. Fwd: Your letter to the DRB Date, December 13, 2012 10:43:42 PM EST ` c Mark Behr, DRB Chair 1 attachment, 5.9 KB ark, I'm sending along Sarah Dopp's reaction to your comments at the November 20th DRB meeting. She did not intend to share it with you, but permitted me to do so. I'm not planning to share it with anyone else. Hers is a widely respected and deeply committed voice in our community, and it reflects the reaction of many in that meeting's audience. I'm not trying to be unpleasant about this, but just to convey that while your comments seemed quite visceral, this was out of character, and I'm willing to give you a pass. I just hope you'll reflect on the merits of a limited connection, as has worked very well at Ridgewood -Indian Creek for MANY years. It offers great value in reducing traffic and enhancing privacy, with NO significant safety compromises. By embracing such a plan the DRB would gain significant status among the City's and the neighborhood's residents, and firm up a visionary precedent. Your and CathyAnn's harsh comments about the need for a full connection, ignored many of the Board's prior comments about acceptability of a partial connection, and truly surprised the neighbors, who expected the Board to welcome their compromise with the Farrell's, and give its support and blessing. Many residents have given much thought to this proposal, and I earnestly hope you'll give it very serious consideration. Needless to say, if at some future date it was improbably determined that the full connection was desirable, it could easily be implemented. To be candid, what was lacking in the Board's and Planner's reaction, was a modicum of common sense. I've enjoyed living in this area for 36 years, and for health and other reasons my remaining time here is quite possibly limited. I could simply fence off whatever the Farrell's build, but I and most neighbors believe strongly enough in our convictions of what's best for the area, to exhaust every legal option to try to get it done right. It would be very sad, after finally coming to agreement with the Farrell's after eight years, that our own DRB became our adversary in a protracted legal battle that will be costly for all, and leave many citizens disgusted. Dead-end streets of up to one-half mile are unequivocally desirable, and notions to the contrary are perverted. Brewer Parkway (where my parents lived) and Meadowood Drive (where I live) are but a few examples. Please consider inviting, or encouraging, Eric Farrell to resubmit a 50-unit proposal with an improved park locate at the southeast part of the parcel. Thanks for taking the time to ponder this, Mark-, I well understand that this has been a long and tedious slog for the Board. We would all love to work with you to bring this to a conclusion that best serves City, neighbors and developer. Warmest regards, Mike Scil-ollirr�� p�` 1-11,41 Zr-L Begin forwarded message: From: Dopp, Sarah 1. " <Sarah.QQgp@vtrnednet.or'o> Date: � cerriber 5, 2012 1:57 05 PM EST To: I (.)LL INS, MARY" <.m�golfins2(�)of it (int.neG, Subject: Your letter to the DRB r-ir f i ;; le lter was exccii nt Yuu aiway s do a great job with such things! I was especially interested in and supportive of the idea of having the park up in the SE corner and larger and with the emergency (only) connector woven into that location I thought it was amazing that Eric had been willing to worts, with ail of you to mod,fy the pians and then, to have the Chair of the 'DRB 6smiss rt out ctf hand as a "non -starter" before the rest of the Commission had even weighed in, was utterly appalling. How would they dare express something different after that opener? It reminded me of the bad old days! Admittedly Mark softened during the meeting, but the first ''scene" was unacceptable. I thought your point was especially strong that there is no evidence or any studies to support the notion of the virtues of automobile connectors between neighborhoods. This is just that, a "notion," not unlike the "notion" that used to be bandied about that the Fire Dept. required mile -wide streets and curbs everywhere, when Mayfair Park (for instance) has been accommodating emergency vehicles (on the few occasions needed) without difficulty, with neither of those physical attributes, for the 60 years I have knowledge of! And, lately, I hear the Fire Dept. concede on those points. These "notions" come and go and the sooner we move toward connecting neighborhoods with walking/biking paths vs. roads the better! I still say that if a real emergency takes place, the emergency connector could be activated quickly and if a little lawn here and there got rutted up in the process, it could easily be fixed after the fact, for the sake of saving a life. You'd think that emergency access was a daily or even annual occurrence!! Anyway, well done, and I hope the DRB takes up the challenge of giving a little bit for the sake of a better outcome for all. Thanks for the time and money all of you have spent on this matter! January 31, 2013 Mr. Mark Behr, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Master Plan Application #MP-11-03 and Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-51 of Farrell Real Estate; (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd.) Dear Chairman Behr: I learned just recently that additional meetings with the Planning Staff, the Police Chief, the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshall have been held to review additional proposed changes in the Spear Meadows matter. As of this date, we have no information as to the nature and extent of the proposed changes or of the Planning Staff's positions on these changes. Nor are we aware of the positions of the Chief, the Director or the Marshall regarding the as yet non-public changes. We assume these changes will be the subject of the DRB hearing on February 5th. Full participation at the February 5th hearing will therefore be difficult, although I will attend and participate to the extent possible. Therefore, I respectfully request that the DRB refrain at the hearing on February 5th from deliberating or making any final decisions on these new proposals until my neighbors and I have a chance to respond in writing. I would like to have the opportunity to learn of the proposals and be permitted a reasonable period of time to provide additional written comment on them and to provide rebuttal evidence, if needed, at a subsequent DRB meeting on this matter. Procedurally I understand the state of the process in the Spear Meadows matter is now as it stood following the hearing in March 2012. The DRB has accepted the Spear Meadows filing as a Preliminary Plat and Master Plan Application over our objection (without providing the required written opinion). For the record, I continue to contend that this matter must be considered as remaining in Sketch Plan Review due to the lack of any DRB vote or decision on Sketch. It is also our position that this matter is subject to Interim Zoning. In addition, I note that only three of the current DRB Members have been part of the DRB since the initial hearings on this matter. For the record, and in order to confirm a quorum for the February 5th DRB hearing, I respectfully request that as DRB Chair you poll DRB members who have not been part of this case from the beginning to confirm on the record that each member has reviewed all of the previous materials in the record. See DRB Rules of Procedure § IX (Dec. 20, 2005) ("Members of the board who have not heard all testimony and reviewed all evidence submitted for a particular application or proposal shall not participate in that proceeding...."). Finally, I am authorized to state that Daniel Seff, attorney for the Gilberts, the Scollins, the Klehs, the Skiffs and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, joins in this letter on behalf of his clients. Thanks very much. Sincerely yours, William A. Gilbert cc: Daniel A. Seff, Esq. Eric Farrell From: Eric Farrell Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:10 PM To: ray Subject: FW: Spear Meadows Attachments: 2013-01-09 L100 Submission.pdf Hi Ray, Here's the plan with a revised date (1/9/13). Eric Eric F. Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com FARRELL REAL ESTATE Mailing: PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Physical: 875 Roosevelt Highway, Suite 120, Colchester, VT 05446 P: 802-861-3000 x12 F: 802-861-3003 C: 802-343-7055 °Prosperity means a healthy, peacefullife withgood rclationshi,s and enough resources to be able to be a blessing to others. " -,Joel Qsteen From: Jeffrey D. Szatkowski [maiIto: jeff(a)tjboyle.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 4:15 PM To: Eric Farrell Cc: Michael J. Buscher; Jeremy B. Owens Subject: Spear Meadows Eric, Attached is the plan with the revised date. Jeff r r southurlington PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, City Planner RE: Agenda #3, Farrell Real Estate DATE: November 15, 2012 Continued Master plan application #MP-11-03 & preliminary plat application #SD-11-51 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of. 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 24 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 21 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear St. The applications were reviewed by the Development Review Board on February 21, 2012 and March 20, 2012. Subsequent hearings were sequentially rescheduled until November 20th. It should be noted that the plan materials submitted this week do not match the agenda description included above. Furthermore, the applicant sent electronic copies of plans on November 14th. The applicant did not provide full sized plans. Therefore, Staff has been forced to review the reduced sized plans. Details are difficult to examine, and it is impossible to scale the electronic version. Comments are thus more limited than Staff would otherwise provide. The applicant would like cursory feedback on several substantial changes to the plan. These changes include, but are not limited to, a reduction to 50 total units, a new cul-de-sac at the end of the new road which is no longer proposed to connect to Vale Drive, a smaller, re -located park, and a reduction in the number of requested waivers. A full review of the plans will be provided after such time as these major issues can be addressed. Number of Units/Density: The applicant is proposing 35 new single family homes and 7 new duplexes, and one existing home, for a total of 50 units. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com The base density of the parcel generated by the land at 1.2 units per acre, based on 25.91 acres, is 31 units. The maximum units allowed, in accordance with Chapter 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and determined by the Neighborhood residential sub -district under the Transferred Development Right program, are 103 units. The applicant is proposing 49 new units, with one existing dwelling to be razed and one to remain, for a total of 50 units within the PUD. This is a proposed density of approximately 1.93 units per acre. A total of 19 transferred development rights would be required. The applicant has stated that they have a legal option to purchase enough development rights to build the project as proposed. Staff has previously recommended that the Board require the applicant to submit the legal documents pertaining to the options for review by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. Staff has also recommended that the development rights be purchased by the applicant prior to issuance of zoning permits for any units beyond the 31 allowed by the property's inherent density. The Board did not previously raise issues with these recommendations regarding timing of transferred development rights. However, they should determine at this stage whether they shall be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval or prior to final plat approval. 1. The applicant shall submit legal documents pertaining to the options to purchase Transferred Development Rights (TDRs) to the City Attorney for approval, at a time determined by the Board. 2. The applicant shall submit legal documents showing clear ownership of the 19 development rights to the City Attorney for approval, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the 32nd unit. Cul-De-Sac and Road Connection: The plans depict a dead end road ending in cul-de-sac of more than 900 feet in length. This dead end is proposed to sit directly opposite a cul-de-sac at the end of Vale Drive, a mere couple hundred feet away, creating two terminuses that do not connect. Section 9.08 of the SBLDRs states unequivocally that: (2) Interconnection of Streets a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. b) Dead end streets (e.g. culs de sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. The Land Development Regulations unequivocally state that dead end streets SHALL not exceed 200 feet in length and that roadways shall connect. In the SBLDRs, SHALL is a prescriptive term and not merely regulatory suggestion, as in the case of the words, `encouraged' and 'should'. Furthermore, the road connection to Vale Drive has been on the South Burlington Official Map since its inception, and the easement was secured with the plan for this connecting road before Vale Drive was built, and before even the first home was built and sold on Vale Drive. Still further, the South Burlington Fire Chief and the South Burlington Director of Public Works are strongly opposed to this dead end, and each strongly urges the Board to require the road connection. They have provided memos to this effect and will both be present at the hearing on November 20tn Finally, Staff has included a copy of the traffic report for the project when 69 units were proposed. As you can see, the increased amount of traffic utilizing Vale is minimal. The increase in traffic between a no -build scenario and one with 69 units includes only 7 westbound vehicles and 4 eastbound going from Nowland Farm Road to Vale Drive, during the PM Peak Hour. The increase in traffic between a no -build scenario and one with 69 units includes only 3 westbound vehicles and 4 eastbound going from Vale Drive to Nowland Farm Road, during the PM Peak Hour. A new traffic study has not been submitted but the current plan calls for 19 fewer units than even that study anticipated. Logically, the increase in trip ends is expected to be even less. Proposed Park: The plans depict a 1.88 acre park. It is unclear if this is proposed to be deeded to the city as a neighborhood park. The plans also include a small area identified as Community Gardens. There are no details available for either the park or the gardens and it is unclear if any programming or park infrastructure is proposed. Previous plans depicted amenities such as basketball courts and a tot playground after communications with the South Burlington Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee. It is also unclear if the proposed park will serve as an amenity not just to the residents of the PUD, but also adjacent neighborhoods or be open to the general public. The applicant has begun discussions with the Director of the Recreation Department, and should continue to as the application evolves. The Director and the applicant should address which facilities shall be planned for the space (ie- basketball courts, play structures, etc), as well as parking needs. The park is proposed to be accessed via a narrow road which will also access three single family homes, and which crosses a wetland. As previously stated, the applicant should work with the Director of Public Works to determine the needs for access and turn -around to this parcel. Section 9 of the SBLDR states that "a range of parks should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children's play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation." Furthermore, "parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program" and "a neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one - quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly -owned recreation area." A walkway is proposed to access the park across the site's wetland. The Board has previously held discussions which required the applicant to remove all structures from the wetland corridor. It is unclear if the proposed walkway will include adding fill to the wetland, or if it is proposed to be a built structure. This has the potential to impact any wildlife corridor which may exist but is unclear at this time.