Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH 1 - Supplemental - 1302 1350 Spear Street
,#**� VERMONT \ 1 State of Vermont GARY FARRELL 1350 SPEAR ST SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 A GENCY OF NA TURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Waste Management Division 103 South Main Street/West Building Waterbury, VT 05671-0404 FAX 802-241-3296 TEL 802-241-3888 August 2, 2010 RE: Site Management Activity Completed — Farrell Residence, South Burlington, Vermont Site # 20093934 Dear Mr. Farrell: The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Sites Management Section (SMS) has reviewed the site file of the above referenced site. During the underground storage tank (UST) removal on August 4, 2008, two holes were observed in the heating oil tank and petroleum odors were noted in the soil near the groundwater interface. Based on the current conditions at this site, the SMS has determined that the site is now eligible for a SMAC (Site Management Activity Completed) designation. This means that the SMS has determined the following: • the 550-gal #2 fuel oil UST has been removed from the ground, and is no longer a continuing source of petroleum contamination at this site; • although low levels of petroleum vapors were noted within the headspace of two of the five monitoring wells installed on site, no groundwater contamination was detected; • any petroleum contaminated soil encountered was backfilled pending the site investigation and was found to not have significantly impacted the groundwater; and • any residual contamination does not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. Based on these findings, the SMS has determined that site management activities have been completed. The completion of these. activities does not release you of any past or future liability which may arise from the petroleum contamination discovered to have originated from the UST at the Farrell Residence site. It does mean that the SMS is not requiring any additional work be performed in response to the contamination discovered at this site. Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact either me or Tim Cropley at (802) 241-3888. Sincerely, Ch c Sch ection Chief Sites Management Section cc: Jerry Howell, Environmental Products & Services of VT South Burlington City Council DEC Essex Regional Office CBS/tc/Y:\ W M_S ites\S ites. F i les\2009.3901. to.2009.4000\2009.3934. Farre I I. Res idence\20 l 0\0802. S mac. Ltr. doc Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury FROM 1f OFFICE OF THE AT. ORNEY GENERAL STATE OF VERMONT 109 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1001 2 sA ,� Chair, City Couit/Chair, City Planni -Comm. 575 Spear feet So. Burlion, VT 05403 STATE OF VERMONT 109 STATE STREET tV'DNTPELIER, VERMONT 05600-1001 J f ., Chair, City Cou' it/Chair, City Planm,k Comm. 575 Spear feet So. Burli#fon, VT 05403 CIVITY el- 000U.11-1 r6UvR,L11NGT01',1' DEPARWENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET .nit P1 RLINGTOI1, VERIAONT 05403 t 'L Ile Onnacie at spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burliogton, VT 0 403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cDo ough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-06-60 of The Schoolhouse Learning Center, Inc, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) 160 single family lots, 2) 60 duplex units, and 3) a 15,200 sq. ft. private educational facility. The amendment consists of: 1) increasing the size of the playground area, and 2) landscaping modifications, 8 Catkin Drive. 2. Final plat application #SD-06-61 of Century Partners, LP to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 96,700 sq. ft. of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the 4 Market St. building by adding 532 sq. ft. of mezzanine space for a total GFA of 15,532 sq. ft., 4 Market Street. 3. Final plat application #SD-06-62 of Allen Road Land Co. to amend a previously approved 44 unit planned unit development. The amendment consists of: 1) enlarging the PUD by 5.5 acres, and 2) constructing two (2) 31 unit multi -family dwellings on 5.5 acres, 150 Allen Road. 4. Final plat application #SD-06-63 of Spear Meadows, Inc. for re -approval of a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single familydwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be ,....�r..__�;._;,.� _:._ ram, ,_:. ..,. ;r •,:. 5. Preliminary plat application #SD-06-66 and final plat application #SD-06-67 of VT Wholesale Foods, Inc, DBA Harrington Bros. for a planned unit development consisting of a 7500 sq. ft. building with 5000 sq. ft. of warehouse use and 2500 sq. ft. of wholesale distribution use. The amendment consists of constructing a 3750 sq. ft. addition for warehouse use, 400 Patchen Road. 6. Final plat application #SD-06-70 of Jane Boisvert for a boundary line adjustment between 95 and 99 Holmes Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. July 26, 2006 R wd LL 9d1 te.e-oaoso NOA LOT 3 I I � ALwid LL Sooir T. wd L KMh 1lNsun� as�o-o�zu - - 7DL A'eorestlonsl Ewnent T—_ .� Open SPeos p I I Nil ICI / k ::: •:'.... � MDAtATt •'•k�' . :.:.I. . �\ r y,. and M fir,_ I / 4 Kdmy i Q far w W4,LFar<�- .. / ,ea N>aa j1640-NM _ �1 ��' I Canwwk Belay 6 I 00 L Hw*sft ,ao-Naw I I I SCALE / - I r — � l F--- -I 1 F — -I, r L-_ i (— —1 , I III KwA III �«I I ` ® � © I KerYp "` I L — — L_-=�—{I ®III p ICI ®I�r=-==-- '� / 7 HOA LOf Y I 'y J �L--rn G Rend F-LINVA - - �BqJ� \ I I I I I II tao-mws i I! I te a-Nss B. Yd T. CYmiawl0� II I 11 12 f 5/2005 FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL RE�E ityOj`So.005 BuNin9ton INDEX OF SHEETS: SITE: CIA MASTER SITE PLAN C1.OA EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN Cl.l-C1.4 ROAD PLAN and PROFILE C1A SEVER LINE CONNECTION AT SPEAR STREET CIA WATER EXTENSION PLAN and PROFILE C1.7 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA SITE PLANS CIA TURN LANE and CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENTS C2.0 SEWER and SITE DEfAIIS C2.1 WATER end STORM DETAILS C2.2 ROAD and SITE DETAILS C2.3 SITE DETAILS CZA EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CS.O SPECIFICATIONS C3.1 SPECIFICATIONS C3.2 SPECU+ICATIONS APPLICANT: S'11' ENGINEER: SITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Ca3 SPECIFICATIONS ERIC FARRELL CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, iNC. T.J. BOYLE ASSOCIATES SURVEY: FARRELL REAL ESTATE P.O. BOX 485 301 COLLEGE STREET S1.0 PLAT of SURVEY - Leach of FARRELL & COLE P.O. BOX 1335 SHE BURNE, VT 05482 BURLINGTON, VT 05401 S1.1 FINAL PLAT of SUBDIMION BURLINGTON, VT 05402 802-985-2323 FAX, 802-985-2271 WEB: wtro.oea-vt.— LANDSCAPING: OWNERS: WETLANDS CONSULTANT: TRAFFIC CONSULTANT: Ll OVERALL LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN �a LIGHTING PLAN L13 LA1AN°NBSc�APE GARY N. and BANE G. FARRELL, et al. GILIIIAN and BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL FUSS and O'NEID TA LA�NDSC�APB and ucHMG PSI 1350 SPEAR STREET 1 CIRCLE, SUITE 5 INTERSTATE DRIVE LO PLANTING NOTES and DETAILS S. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 BARRE, VT 05641 RRE, W WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 L7 SITE DETAILS AsLn,nDy,.0 SEE NOTE 3 I I PLAN REFERENCES: A. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY - PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE OF ILA M. ISHAM" PREPARED BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., LAST REVISED JUNE 30, 1999. B. 'PLAN OF LAND OF HARRY B. and BERNICE N. CONKUN" PREPARED BY J.M. SINCLAIR, DATED JULY 1943. C. "FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT AND JOHN LARKIN" - PINNACLE O SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWLAND TWO), PREPARED BY BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED 8/21/1998. D. "PLAT SHOWING SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LANDS OF PINNACLE ® SPEAR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED & BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED 3/31/1999. E. "SWIFT ESTATES' PREPARED BY WILLIS ENGINEERING, DATED 9/21/1971. F. "LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAT", PREPARED BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., DATED 4/21/2002. G. "PLAT OF SURVEY - LANDS OF FARRELL & COLE,' PREPARED BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED NOV. 29, 2005. NOTES: 1. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO DEPICT THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF GARY N. FARRELL ET AL. VOL. 274 PG. 280 & 402. REF. SHALL BE MADE TO REFERENCE PLAN G (SHEET S1.0) FOR DETAILS OF PERIMETER SURVEY & EXISTING MONUMENTATION. 2. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH A TOTAL STATION AND A STEEL TAPE BETWEEN FALL 2003 AND WINTER 2004-5. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE REFERENCED TO ASTRONOMIC NORTH BASED ON SOLAR OBSERVATIONS MADE IN SEPTEMBER, 1995. SEE PLAN REFERENCE A. 4. SPEAR STREET HAS A RECORD 66 FOOT WADE RIGHT OF WAY, LOCATION HERE DETERMINED BY EXISTING MONUMENTATION AND THE TRAVELED PORTION OF THE ROAD. REFERENCE TOWN OF BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS 1802-1865, PAGE 22 AND TOWN OF SHELBURNE TOWN MINUTES VOLUME 1, PAGE 229. 5. MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE, SANITARY SEWER, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE LOT LINES OF THE PARENT PARCELS FROM POINTS OF ORIGIN THROUGH PUBLIC RIGHT'S OF WAY OR RECORDED EASEMENTS. 6. NOT BEING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY, CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. HAS UNDERTAKEN NO INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER THE PROPERTY AND EACH COMPONENT THEREOF IS IN COMPUANCE WITH LOCAL OR STATE PERMITS. 7. THIS PROPERTY UES IN THE 'SOUTHEAST QUADRANT" AND 'DORSET PARK SCENIC PROTECTION - ZONE D" ZONING DISTRICTS. 8. A 60' WIDE 'EASEMENT' AND A 20' WIDE 'RECREATIONAL EASEMENT", BETWEEN VALE DRIVE AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, ARE DEPICTED ON REFERENCE PLAN 4, AND REVISED (AS SHOWN HEREON) ON REFERENCE PLAN 3. THE EARLIER ALIGNMENT IS REFERENCED IN AN 'IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION" TO THE CITY DATED NOV. 15, 1995 AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 428 AT PAGE 732. 9. TEN FOOT WIDE PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT TO EXTEND 10' INTO LOTS FROM STREET R.O.W. 10. STREET NAME IS PENDING FOR STREET LEADING TO LOT 19. UVM and State Agricultural College Volume 134, Puge W4 \�7�8 gFy,\OU No "SWIFT ESTATES" SUBDIVISION P.B. Grabowski M. & M. Scollins T. and L. Kleh C. Shand et al =?�� & J. L. Milot volume 1 r5, Page 523 I Volume 175, Page 163 Volume 405, Page 726 VO Volume 643, Page 297 I - 20 Recreational Easement S0733'16"E _ 50531'35E See Note 8 SOT32'21'E - i• "� _ 454.43 359.08 - - _ _ _ - - - - _- - - - - _ - 268.55' VALE DRIVE _ _ Open ' _ oS n'3s'w No631'36'W ' N0a31'35•W S Ewa -,� ^Plnrreae p spew No733'16'w No73s•,e'w SpgV2'W'E NOT33'18'W N0733'IB'VI 100.00'- .� w ___..eg,is• _..-_ .113.76'�. ____„4.1g•____,. ,. eN \ 128.10' f00.OD'----'-f0200•----- m0 NOT3S,8•si: : - D LOT 1 7� gol LOT iS 41,34' I I N1125'OS'E LOT 6ylif__ I ' 41� 2 - nl_ • :°I 46.33' / 1&45' • = LOT f2 4 NO]7Y1Cw _ O1I•� f��} O I v ' SO733Y6'E _ ^1 LOT 10 LOT It 200.eS' Ali LOT 18I LOT 17 CII� LOT 18 �^ / R _ SM73Y6'E Y - 196.97 �I I p;!F - - - m �( I =� I Larkin/Milot Partnership NE 204.4-1 - 3 fv , I i� $ �? Lot 14 :1 ' ' I volume 296, Page 538 LOT LOTS ¢xp g a 6 $I AI& _N_O7'SS'16•w_ E 1M671.3s•IN N067f'S5W D67,'Sfi•w sora16'E _ Ii4 I 200.78' ,24.29' 1f175' ih.36' -304341GE01. uLOT 15 D N m.86 zD9.7z' i Y n LOT 9 R, i LOT 4 g $ �NIS14'S9"w 00.25 -N039_ �.- _•_ 9062720,E S13 439"E ,00 W�• II m T HOA LOT 3 N134.46' E LOT,3 24.46' 44 1 �4j1r` n�ei / 5Q82' LOT 2 J. Kelley . / Vokane 283 *Ss• TO � ` / Page 269 \ LOT \ m LOT 1 w I MOT I ,dos' I Hacked I S1474o43'w 6o D' I Bailey Estate I I LOT AREA Square Feet Acres HOA Lot 1 133.052 3.054 HOA Lot 2 111.269 2.554 HOA Lot 3 32.916 0355 Road R.O.W. 201,881 4.630 1 24,292 0.558 2 19,809 0.455 3 22,515 0.517 4 19.121 0.439 5 18,636 0.428 6 20.372 0.468 7 15,568 0.357 8 17,939 0.412 9 19,765 0.454 10 25.992 0.597 11 25,486 0.585 12 24.818 0.570 13 16,066 0.369 14 18.071 0.415 15 17.439 0,400 16 20.816 0.478 17 18,736 0.430 18 19,550 0.449 19 143,980 3.305 20 141.118 3.287 Totat 1,131,057 25.966 10553�-f01.85 7a4e• 1�la NB628'F4'E 299.53, NI' 1" LOT, - 72.48' --NO3�44 W 7. HOA LOT 2 ¢. �I � N -i 0' 1 SEE CURL£ TABLE IIB FOR DATA (71R) n`O ll S-002711'1y Nn'2�4-17 W- `` s, a26Y5B3''w \ 'S2' 373.38' ® W. and M. Gilbert _ : = �� \ � Volume 209, Page 225�` � K L \ to WOE PEDESTRIAN ` 3ff NDTE,e \ EASEMENTARE4 TO l / \ DEEDED TO AND T. 8 M W'LYo D. S L YDUND / N8732'23"E LOT 19 CURVE DATA CURVE LENGTH I RADIUS DELTA CH. LNO7H cm. BRNG. 56.18' 8.00' 652Y0' 56.14' N8400'11'w _A_ e 140.57' 28.00' 17&63' 5941816,E C 103.10' 46a.OW _151512_ 123720' 102.89' SM14'36'E D 105.29' 71100' 87'WW 96.37 551,03,16,E E_ &34' 475.00V IW'ZO'_ &34' S8256'53W f 1.68' 25.00' 1.68' S8410'28'W B 33.90' 475.0T _91l'0l' 4W'20" 33.89' S8529'43'111 H 46.00' 25.00' 454'W 44.98' S95'01'2rW t 127.59' 100.00' 731I8Y0' 119.11' 55049'18"w J 83.79' S0.0(Y 73VS d, 1 59.55 SSOWt'w K 93.32' 75.00' 7051'14' 58.60' S2P4939'E L 327.94 75.00' 25"'44' 122.47' S6910'21'w 100.14 f �o. �'• TOT YD \ (65.14') SI4W 0.16 ACRES TO BE 00.23'\ \ I t0.23' DEEDED TO fRANZOIw 2' 'E / S1426'13'W I YI ,.®....-35W 200.44' ft1 Open „q^"'o r4 ,T.^ .. 'PIrDMcb � Spear` FP O.OBACRES TO BE sy 834�u,w N DEEDED TOWLRFSON i I NT47s:�3 f _ sesW 3?'J 64 Voluumer41 I T & M. / (. H 7 Sr6 4n Page 99 Wulfson I D. & C. Framo . I Vol. 665 Page 349 Vaume 2f r 4 I Page 447 1 \ 4SpF�\ I I I G SporzyTTsla \ 'i7 I h rrlTdd Lavigne StirA,,� III IF D. Muhr I M. Dencker 4 \ Volume 218 Volume 137 I I I EASEMENT AREATO fPege287 I Page 323 I Cimmor.M BE DEEDED TO KAREN, ��y.• I I KEItIM a RRENT I ' • J fMREIl d BRENDA ':-)�vasiri K3 I 1 COLS 1 PROPERTY LtHE Al LEGEND /dA0 - - - SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE V / F, EXISTING PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE • CALCULATED POINT -- - ZONING BOUNDARY CMFMNf0 CONCRETE/MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND e,F/RFO IRON PIPE/REBAR FOUND (w/SIZE) A "T BAR' FOUND AG ABOVE GROUND O 5/8" REBAR w/ SURVEY MARKER, PROPOSED O 4" CONC. MONUMENT TO BE SET ----. --- FENCE LINE 'HOA' HOME OWNERS' ASSOCIATION vQ�'10 / jCv GRAPHIC SCALE 1 inch - 100 It To the best of my knowledge & belief this plat properly depicts the results of a survey conducted under my supervision as outlined in the notes above, based on our analysis of records & physical evidence found. Existing boundaries shown are In substantial conformance with the record. This plot is in substantial conformance with 27 VSA 1403. 7--thy R. Cowon VT.. LS. 597 N ROAD SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL ENWNEEAING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.D. 50 i 435 SNELBURNE, 1705462 scaaeaz:.zs E.U: snz-saszzn "zt: wn...cca-vr.cor olu- PJM / JLM clmcxeD JLM APP.m TRC PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT TSUS ECr m� L GEC LOCATION MAP FINAL PLAT of SUBDIVISION DATE DBAIrDiC NU,OiHt DEC. 5, 2005 61.,A S 1.1 1" =100' Door. No. 02250 I T I T. and L Kleh I. Isham Estate SITE ENGINEER: K and M. Scolins 1160-00219 0570-01225 / R. and M..�' Cllf 1160-00214 _ _ �;v`_�-T,•�i " - -- - - 'r— - 'r 1645-00089 � *.. �'.' =.,,-.- `_ - _ _ ----- _ , ' - - - CIYIL HiGMMING ASSOCIATES. INC. _ _ _ _ _ 395_------__ -__ .__ .._ __ _"_ _ _ ._ _ `�Mn"�� P.O.OXA855HEIBURN£t? 54a:? -� '• _ --- - -- --,_-_ - - - --- _ - - _-_---------..\�.------- -- 95 �\ - P .®952J23 FAX 80298H 2Y/. nre., �wrn cea K._... - - - _ _ _ _ _ 3 _-- - - _ --- 9�L -_` '-PlrLnac 0 •- --- --395--- - _ ' � -'__. _________ .__-___ _.__ --_-� __ .. __--395 _ _-__. _. _ _ ___ �^ 1 •r - 3 - \ - _ 1 3y. _- -_ n --- / - _ -" 39 - _ '390- / � sav -------------------- MEADOWS .�o.N �Aw Paitilei8i� � PROJECT: Karen Kev�i sold Brent Farrell 1742-00033 SPEAR +pC A /1640-1340,- 3-^' /� .71 C/\R a \ --- --- / - SPEAR STREET Cy \ `\------- -� Q \ � � �� -- -- - �_- • SOUTH BURLING ON In11�NP,, ------------ VERMONT •-••\ /�� _•.`. -1 .__:`:: YAWAM D. COUNTRYMAN NDS �• � �9g�=. �� DELINEATED 8Y _• �.� r._�. _ �. -- - -- /'• \ E' --- •,L;>.'�?•r'_'- :i«=-r -rrr.y� .igi{ram :.rr:: r_-� .: r.�}. _- - - - - -- 8 - aP1�Y1 `f f VP 8V GEND S RUCES Bq'-S- +'� nNc CDNTCQIR 90 _ l/ 1 -s W. and M ° - 88 Open Space - -___- 1640-01400 �391------------ ___ Pinnacle at Spear � SS GRANTY SEWER ME i 1 / —FM— FORCE YAW 1 ,5�0'" SWfUCES ' �1•-- / - / - - — —w — WATER UNE —OE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC • ' ` - - — —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC I (1l ,-' 1 � % - - / \ � ` ( - , • � _ _ { — UT — UNDQtIXtOUND TELEPHONE — G — GAS UNE —ST— STOW DRAINAGE UNE ( __ SEVER 1 / / : O SEVER ANWLECIEANOUT (� and J. Farrel �I ' , --'' __ -- G.D. I jl.- 3------- M ' 1640-01350 / 1 %� -�, 39• � QL Farrel 1 ® ® STORM NANHgE 1 '•� W 1 ---- I a9 I{ / HYDRANT 1640-01302 -�\ � , � ` __ _ � ® ® SHUT -Off CATCH BASIN `\i / m POWER POLE \ � ``� I (� �/ // / //j , / ( ICI �1 ---- � �39r• •,--.-.•.,-,-•�Y. EDGE of wooDs L_j r I I J L snd D. Ybylmg ` ^s�.°`�> •\ \\ _` ,s✓ / - '' 1640-01402CL z"m I C01mxft Baled Estate .�,`� ------ / �,, I I I • - 1640-01408 I _ c/o L Nadcett \ ` - / I I I - r r M. Dencker 1640-01350 T. and M WWF80t1 I 1 7 -- _ I 1640-01430 '39 .�\� / 1 I I 1640-01404 I % I EXISTING SMH \ -385 -\ �� \ I i j I 1 �. and C. FrBn'4'1I'�-- RIM=390.0t I I I /1 I / INV-385.4s 1640-01406,------- I R. anavigned E L I ,q I I ----- r J I 1640-01331 � � � _ \ \ \ I I I s I B. and T. Cknn7nettl TR�;i` 1640-01393 III �\ �� I I I I I E�7GHyNE�7ba+T-Yyj I I I I ' I I EXISTING SMH ' _ I 1 I r RIM-384.5t `�\ I INV-379.2t \- _•(\ f l '_-_3��_�\I I I l I ffi I I f I L L 1� I Q iava; Liz - II II EXISTING-SMH I I RIM=377.5t I I 4NV=373.2t II IZA1051 SAV I FlNAL PLAN SU8NITTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN ona DAW4ING mLemm WN., 2W4 r - w C1.0A F=. NO. 022W s R. and M. Skiff 30' WIDE WATER EASEMENT 8- C1.52 D.I. WATER 24" x 8' TAPPING LINE CONNECTION SLEEVE AND VALVE TO SWIFT STREET 9,00 8+00 ------ ---- ----------- - - ---- --- -- --- - 90- C8 #4 0 ----- RIM.391155 CL52 D.L_ INV-387.7 TONNE TO SWIFT MEET 7117 ---------- UVM and State Agricultural College L PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1 "_40' L L— — — -- — — — 40( 39( 39, 381 3a, Dal 37, 37 36 DATUM &Z 365.00 SITE ENGINEER: AL WYII ENGINEERING M INC. I M ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 486 SHELBURNE, VT W32 YD #1 802-98F=3 Fk- W2-085-T 71 393,5 Co ',5 INV-390.0 V- 9.7 INV CB #6 RIM392.7 SMH 4 STA 11 PJM INV_3a9'9 RIM-3 INV ot SAV SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS 011- SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT �CB 13 -7 KVm387.5 SERVICE FDRI MAIN- 1r St 40 PVC (TYP F_ LEGEND ---------------- EXISTINC;— --------- ---- - SHAFT STREET GRADE — - — — — — — — — — — — Ox R5 �25 Kn 24 )T_6" TAPPING El SLEE) E AND VALV APPROXI EXISTINC MATE LOCATPN 24 WATER OF MAIN 6 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 WATER LINE PROFILE STATION 0+00 TO 10+05 I' - 4 . VERTICAL 1. = 40' HORIZONTAL /+uv O1vv V+.v 'U+UU —3 CGS"NG CONTOUR 6— PROPOSED CONTOUR - — —SS— GRAVITY SEWER UNE "— W LINE o GE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC f_ tq0 —UE— —UT— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE G — GAS NNE ST — STORM DRAINAGE LINE 0C.O. GRAVITY SEWER CLEANOUT 0 SEWER MANHOLE STOW MANHOLE JX Ai HYDRANT • 0 SHUT-OFF 8' VALVE 15 CATCH BASIN POWER POLE & TEE EDGE OF WOODS !/5/051 SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL WATER EXTENSION PLAN and PROFILE NOV., 2004 AS SHOWN C1.6 I'T 02250 / /1 o EXISTING fffMH RIM=39 INV=38 4t DA2VAf 62 32Y) 00 _ - II l dI 6) III II I I I I' - ' / n�- SITE ENGINEER: C' I,- PTATIN A SERVICE FORCE I MAIN (TYP) LOT N I WATEk SERVI E WITH I TYP GURBSTOP ' . ` - I I (- ) I I I / i I { , / �� y , 9 11 1 SERVICE TO 15 5 II I i I I I •r r I / CIVIL INGINEEUM ASSOCIATES, INC AL i I // I P.O.BOX48 SHELBURN$ Vr 0502 I1 EYOHD W I O I I C / _'WAY TYPII I I I / 6 .Ir �/ o auzva, zaza� �/xORCE Ifs WIDTH (20') I I ( I I o M;"((IN ) /! II ,-FES^ / I w J I \ I / I/ X FIELD LOCATE DRIVE IG. CURB CUTS (Wa12' TYP) PJM yA. _ \ FES 8' CL52 D.I. LTIEc® A o522G A WATER LINE $AV o eo �' OF7 1Y i .I ` / • I CONNECTION _ Isrc J i L /I TO SWIFT STREET SARV DAuI _' I 3a PROJECT: + .5g0 ROPOSED HY�RANT _ 2" SCH 40 PVC SPEAR 0 9y RECREATION PATH ,0 ' OR SDR 21 PVC & VALVE (TYP)\� B' CL52 D.I. --� fig- �•` 9 FORCE MAIN (TYP) \ WATER LINE '"Y Ip�+O 38 z 10Fa+0 107 9\ V 108 � � 3� � � MEADOWS % OUTL$T STRUCTURE - _ INV OaT=384.5 I \ INV=37�O STORM r I 0 S j WATER ` 1 / MANAGEMENT , AREA jR PARTIAL SITE PLAN �� I 1 "= 40' ------- HIGH POINT ELEV = 391.83 INV- 3g4.5 FOUNDATION- -3 I, DRAIN (TYP) I I I I I I I �81 #3 INV=385.1 \ II I I I �NIM=391.55 RIPRAP OVERFLOW INV=387.0 FENCING (A)/ pi I 11 I I I �RIMH IINV-384.3 INV=384.0 \1 I� _. _ .� i L- _ _ _ I � � _,•� r II)l CHLINEiSH�ET C1.2 r I I SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON R�iMsa.7 VERMONT INV=389.7 CB #6 9,p RIM=392.7 I i INV:389.9 I /F SMH 0 I STA 109+50 jl INV OU3.35 , 0 S O ' INV OUT=393 `f7;7 ���fff + - 1 10' RECREATION '?�©� PATH 7 7' GREEN 0 BELT STA1#IA 10+7 RIM=394.6 INV IN=388.3 !INV OUT=388.2 I04 LOW POINT LOW POINT ELEV.- 389.62 A - 100+07. PVI STA PVI ELEV 102+00 = 392.00 -- -- - ----- _,.-_--_- LOW POINT E _ 388.84 PVI ST --PM E - 100+20 389.62 A.D. _ -2.78 .7,p4___.- LOW POINT STA - 104+59.36 A.D - 1.32 50. ' VC PIA ELEV = 388.35 + K 18.93 - C) 100 25. 000' VC K = 0,64 m+ 408 .- H n JOO.00DO' VC O Q N n$ P m w a m - I lE & VALVE V) IA D ri i m W NEW N & VALVETYP. RANT u. > - n I n - w n -� () � 592 i 3 _ a0 A a FINISH GRADEQ -------- 1.00x ---- ---- - - g DpE - EXISTING_ _ It I Z ro GRADE -�- 24 • HOPE� ` - -�-- - 18 HOP -_�� -- ST M DRAIN I 584 & CAPS I 2 WATER -- ----�.-- VV _ - g CL52 DI WR 2' OR CH 40 PVC ,SDR 21 PVC VALVES- &TEE -- - t„ -- --��� --�- � i I STORM DRAIN �----- 380 -- -- ---- RIGID INSULATION WHERE MINIMUM MAINTAINED �O' AS REQUIRED COVER 13 AS D E NOT �6 ---- -I'--------� -.. ------ - -I---- -- -----r- 580 ------� 376 i- BY THE ENGINEER, 0T£GT18N TO Pf -FR 3 OVIDE ' THE-- 4I -� I -� 37� �- -�- - -- STORM SYSIIEM. ---- r-- - - ---- ( -- - - ---- - i ---� 372�- {�-ICI- -i-- I __._ I _.. ___�-_-11 _�___--t-__---__.-_ .--� ._-.-1._-_.-�72ry W O O Oi O W G) 1'c� mm 40 O r Oi 01 Mm OJ �W MM OM OI m �W Oi r7M O trlM O Qmp M�j p�mT MM O Mh D' CN '- MM C.j 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 TU4+UU wruu PROFILE STATION 100+00 TO 109+00 1' = 4' VERTICAL 1. = 40' HORIZONTAL IUO+VU 1U/+UU 108+00 109+00 . saa "*TING CONTOUR NosW1D y3g- rP➢PD�D PROPOSED CONTOUR - -SS- MANITY SEWER LINE - -FM- FORCE MAIN - - W - WATER LINE - -DE- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - -UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - --UT- UNDERGROUND TELEPNONE - - G - GAS UNE - -ST- STORM DRAINAGE LINE 0,Q GRAVITY SEWER CLEANOUT QS ® SEWER MANHOLE © ® STORM MANHOLE �( HYDRANT 0 O SHUT-OFF ■ ■ CATCH BASIN `a. POWER POLE EDGE OF WOODS DATD CHEC® REW90N 12/5/05SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL ROAD PLAN and PROFILE DATE DRAIONG NDNHBR NOV., 2004 S SHOWN C1.1 PRDT. NO. 02250 8+00 C8 #4 RIM-391.55 �� _ INV-387.7 ir CL52 D.I. - _ CONNEC CONNECTtQN •TO SWIFT SWET --21, - YD #3 SMH #IA YD 02 CB #9 RIM=398.4 YD #1 STA 110+75 RIM-396.2 SMH #2 RIM=397.55 INV=394.9 RIM-393.5 RIM-394.6 CS ' INV=392.7 STA 113+25 INV=394.5 INV-390.0 INV IN=388.3 INV OUT=388.2 RN=395.4 I RIM=397.it CB N10 #6 SMH #1 STA 109+50 INV=3924 1 INV IN=386.8 RIM-397.55 rCS RIM=392.7 CS #8 INV OUT-386.7 INV-394.3 I INV=389.9 RIM-393.35 INV OUT-388.8 RIM=395.4 INV-392.2 - x - t4 OD SITE ENGINEER: ROADWAY SMH #3 (28') RIMSTA 399.E INV IN=385.3 INV IN 38 iWIDTH 7' GREEN 1 RECREATION �"'°+� r - FIELD LOCATE DRIVE INV OUT=385.2 BELT PATH I-- CURB CUTS (W=12' TYP) Z10' W r �, /' - CIVIL INGINUIUNG ASSOCIATFS INC. f! i P.O. BOX4B5 SHELSURNE, VT 05482 8g � _ _ _ _ b^299Sd323 FAZ' 802B83d2)I wWD w.n,.cea-Ncw.: 399 901r00 396 202,00 LJ _ J DRAIIN � PJM o- - _ _ -f_ -- _ - I �'--- FOFINDA i� -92 DRAIN cTYP) _ 1J . --- -1 i l i I- i - ---------------- -%QC. 03 '� HYDRANT•__ I I I RIM-391.55 INVm387,5 -- \ I I &VALVE (TYPj' {__1` I --- - - - - 71� WATER SERVICEE.WITFI ---' 1STOPCURB SERVICE TO85. - SERVICEBEYOND ROW I I \ '. 10 III III I I I 14 l CB 1 MAIN- 1 'SOH I I I I I {,OT IIII I I RIM-#1396.7 ® 40 PVC TYP) I , �l(TW) I ' I -' I I - - - - - - - - INV=390.0 _-------- -- ===----- ----- ; A TIAL SITE PLAN--. I MATCHLINe EEt 61.1 HIGH POINT ELEV = 399.59 HIGH POINT STA = 115+93.43 PVI STA = 116+05.70 PVI ELEV = 399.91 10. _ -2.65 K = 37.73 -'" SAV]! I - APPROvBD '�'y}•� SAV _I_ _ _ - _ -_.I PRWECf: I ' I t SPEAR CB #12 16 MEADOWS NV=389.8 I ' / #1 - 118 I I I RIM RIM391.3 5 +00 INV-388.65 I RIM=396.6 NV I38383.1 - N I I I I SPEAR STREET I INV OUT=383.o I J SOUTH BURUNOTON L �GRAV(TY SEWER I -? VERMONT 00 p o o� +q < h 0 M ap O t0 ID pnj Oi N -.--_. - - -- -- NM1 n ± HYDRANT -` -- -*? -`- Nj. I 1 - g -- �- &VALVE �- -- a - O1 EXISTING GRADE N I + _In a o I`FINISH D, m u - --- - - N 1 o M vt - Ha--u) 489 - - -- -- - if -- �- �_ n + On m DO 2 \ M7 1. ---- �--- - _- 92 - "t5= 5 2 DI WA 15 DPE I m - 1 - - - -.. - --^°:� OTT ---- .-4-- - VA co N7 DO iSr Do --- ----- --- -- - -�----- - --- -157 & TEE -- o----- - --- r -- --- -- - M �- - -- - - - --+ N771 t i - -- - Z Z IK Z O O> DO - - - _ p R6 I - �T---- ---- ---- - ---- - I -'�- 372-- nfh bM �� .N M M T MM M Ya MM NNj � em'l u7 mN MM MM Old Tm M M M M M M M M M 109+00 110+00 111+00 IT[+W I- PROFILE .... VV STATION 109+00 TO 118+50 1" = 4' VERTICAL 1" - 40' HORIZONTAL A Van; EXISRNG CONTOUR -J78 EODWIK PAOP�04➢ PROPOSED CONTOUR - -SS- GRAVITY SEWER ME -FM- FORCE YAW --- - W - WATER LINE -- -0E- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC --.. -UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC --- - _UT- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - -- G - GAS ME- -ST- STORM DRAINAGE UNE OGO GRAVITY SEWER CLEANOUT ® ® $EWER MANHOLE ® ® STORM MANHOLE +v TZ HYDRANT ® 0 SHUT-OFF ® ® CATCH BASIN 'rL POWER POLE /WvvYVW� EDGE OF WOODS OAT¢ cm=D I !/5/05' SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL ROAD PLAN and PROFILE DA18 DRAWWG RIIL®8R NOV., 2004 ASSHOWN C1.2 PROL. NO. 02250 MATCHLINE SHEET Cl 5 FIELD LOCATE DRIVE CURB CUTS (W-12) 7' GREEN I BELT 10' RECREATION PATH WATER SERVICE WITH CURB STOP (TYP)- SERVICE TO BE 15' BEYOND ROW 1 I SMH /3 STA 118+08 RIM-399.6 INV IN=385.3 INV OUT-385.2 I I I - `• SMH PA PJM. INV=OUT-38T � � � 18 L_'. - FOUNDATION DRAIN (TYP) •I 1'r GRAVITY SEWRI( SERVICE (TYP) pp DIMMH /i I' R=391.3 I' I INV=388.65 LOT III I'• fTn') 16 I S q 11a I RIM�396.6+0D INV .IN=383.1 I INV'T=383. I CB /I2 =SIN o Mmm fflmml iWm t4) I ! 'HYDRANT do :VALVE (TYP) 1 . \ SMH 1 STA 124+05 RIM-395.2 f .INV IN=379.7 1 , .'INV OUT-379.11 1 'CB #22 / " RIM-392.8 / INV-390.2 CS #21 RIM-392.8 i I \ FENCING (� INV-390.0 FES INV ° DMH /3 \ 1INV=388.8 i RIM394.0 i INV-389.5 1 ' FES / WA70 + ( s INV-389.25 / STORMWATER •, R MANAENT GEM ' \1l- STRUC e ' AREA WT4tT RE i a FENCING �Y IOUTL-f INV= a F , OU T STRUCTURE / DMH X R ' TLET INV=389.0 / RIM / CR♦ �IM p11349FE5S j i!/>ia ININ 38 / �9 gg 8 NV= IN -1.5 H #5 STA 12+00T1NV=88.5 RIM-39=3.42.0V ENV- 388.5 ',' a NV OUT-38(., i SITE ENGINEER: CB #20 SMH #8 RIM=395.1 STA 301+90 / INV-391.0 RIM-394.2 INV h% u INV TOUT 378.5 / / CMI. ENGINEEtING ASSOCM7ES, INC, M P.O. BOX485 SHELBURNE, Vf OU82 842-09M232d F,LC' 802885.22)f web. w c'' DRAWN M ;x3 5.5 301+00 'PS +00 303+00 PJM Q(122 SAVs Cr \ •X _ to APPH➢l'® �STC SAV owl �. U PROJECT: m -,1 CB #19 F- INV=394.25 / (- LLLLJ I SPEAR INV=390.5 U) MEADOWS LLJ 93,0' SPEAR STREET Gass _ _ _ _ _ = SOUTH BURUNGTON �B 39 j L __--tU� VERMONT I I i RIM '. ryY / ' � B------------ INV=390.3 10' WIDE PEDE'STWAN 0 P 3 75 ' - - - - PARTIAL SITE PLANCB I I I \`` RIM 31 I 9,8 ,!I� �3 5 �5 I I RIM=392.2 VALVE INV=388.0 INV_390.6 Tw ( ) SMH p6 =�"- •-' CB itt6 RSTA IM=393 00 _ 1"=40' l 13 ;� 14 INV-39p.01 O �I(,,�1,�, ,' Y I I RIM=394.7 FES _ RIM=3922 INV IN=381.0 INV-390.4 j �\ I 1 INV�391.7 INV-388.0 INV OUT=380.9 %11x. HIGHPOINT ELEV = 395.55 HIGH POINT ELEV = 394.49al 3e// POINT ELEV - 3922 HIGH POINT STA = 124+41.13 PVI STA = 124+50 LOW POINT ELEV - 393,02 -V LOW POINT STA = 125+77 27 HIGH POINT STA - 126+74.27 PIA STA = 126+75 p --.>,a ----. - DUSTING CONTOUR 'A m L W - N LOW POINT STA - 121+09.08 PIA STA = 121+00 - 95. A.D. _ -3.54 PIA STA = 125+75 PVI ELEV - 394.75 N K = 14.11 PVI ELEV = 392.75 A.D. - -4.12 O PVI ELEV _ 392.04 _ -_--. _--- ___-�____.__ VIY_.-._ ..._�-. A.D. 4.40 -__-_.--. K 12.13 m < K = 5.80 Ul & VALVE ( .� M t N 50.0000, VC 50.0000' VC D } N 9 N M h N N I N N W + O _W M = Q VI ~ (J +m� _ to4 N+ h N+ M M c) --I-- --__ m M -_ o+ - _ .. - u~ n - aD M. FINIS - M - - F _.... N II - - J 4' 1 STOR DPE DRAINS = Q m m o _ n N W H p --GRAD I - v N - - 00 ED -- - - - -- - N In OT._.-- �� I _ EXISTINq 388 --- - -- ---- GRADE --- - - - -_ I = 8" VALVE -E ---- WA TER --- -- -- -- --- ------+- - - - - i - , -- I-- ri GD L°Oj ARA I I WHERE INIMUM I I ? o �� _ MAINTAINED AS DIRECTED OR o DO -- -- _ ._.- ___�_.�4� of Z_ Z TO PROVIDE IIFes. FROST ; o - z o I I g r T- i STORM YSTEM z Z �- -- z z -------�- - - ---- r --�- - -- - {-- ...__� ON m0 <m ,G�! MN '-Y O,n M� O�j OM ^000 lV �4 NNj �O < mb b m� MN "10 mN p< MM priri N "?N rnN [V4 MM MM M �� MM MM MM e�,IM MIT Mq wn M mM iry 336- RIME PAOPOff➢ PROPOSED CONTOUR 404 - -SS- GRAVITY SEWER LINE --- -I FORCE MAIN _ W - WATER LINE --. .-OEM OVERHEAD ELECTRIC '--UE-� UNDERGROLMD ELECTRIC 400 -__ _-UT- UNDERGR"D TELEPHONE --_ -- G - GAS LINE - -ST- STORM DRAINAGE UNE OGQ GRAVITY SEWER CLEM OUT 396 0 ® SEWER MANHOLE 0 0 STORM MANHOLE x( x( HYDRANT O 0 SHUT-OFF ■ ■ CATCH BARN 392 ,a POWER POLE rvvvwvvY'� EDGE OF WOODS TN'Q �� nevls�Drc 388 184 i6o 12/5/m SAV 1 FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL ROAD PLAN 176 and PROFILE i72 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 PROFILE 123+00 124F00 125+00 126+00 127+00 127+35 STATION 118+50 TO 126+00 1' = 4' VERTICAL 1' = 40, HORIZONTAL DAiE DRAWING Ni0®� NOV., 2004 AS SHOWN C1.3 PRDl. NU. 02250 No Text 1 1Y} 1 1 DMH #5 'RIM=388.0 \ INV=384.3 1 \ 1 FENCING AROUND I ENTIRE MANAGEMENT', \ Cl�\#2 RIM='3,88.35 INV=388� 1- i=384.2 \\ a a CB #1 aV RIM=388.35 INV=385.3+ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT'. AREA #1 V co a a r a .ES=384.0 \\ / a i If a l� fC-s a 7 I If \71 a 7 I 7> \ MANAGEMENT AREA #2 I � , FENCING AROUND \ ENTIRE MANAGEMEN AREA \ I \ a \ DMH #1 ' RIM=391.3 INV=388.65 I ' FES I INV=388.6 � I 1 _ 1 rl' � I M I ' ' j � I 11 11i ° Do L� M I I OUTLET ISTRUC. INV OUT=388.5 CB #14 II RIM=394.7 \INV=39i\5 ° \ J CB ' 2 RIM6.7 \\ INV9.8_ , 06£ vv ° 118 +00 ST - C"11 CB #13 RI�1=396.7 ,% RIM=39�.7 INV=390.0 , INV=391�7 FEES I 3 W l v ✓ � ,r , y J/ r Jr W ID L - -- v b \ R,--- V-----�- I FES. INV=388.5--- RIM=392.2 W INV=390.6 CB #16 y W Y- ��\ RIM=392.2 INV=390.4 OUTLET STRUC. INV OUT=389.0 w ` FENCING AROUND ENTIRE MANAGEMENT AREA FES NV=389.25 \ \ 3g8 Ii DMH #3 '388 \\ RIM=394.0 \ i INV=389.5--- \ DMH #2--- - RIM=393.0 UG INV=389.95 CB #18-- - RIM=393. 10; INV=390. Y � 12 100 3 CB #17 \� r`.S i)rf RIM=393.0 INS 390.5 ` \ y y r4 CB #19 i21M=394.25 U STORMWATER INV=S90.5\ MANAGEMENT AREA #3 C� -------` �n C°tY ®f so SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL 1NGINEIEING ASSOCIATES, INC, F.O. BOX48S SHELBURNE, VT O5482 &0T495-2?29 FAX 9pFD9122/'i :Wh vixrce�-txm DRAWN OF PJM g'\p�4� SAA CIen A eo/' A V-01 n SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LEGEND ..ass ............. E)OSRNG CONTOUR 3M- PROPOSED CONTOUR - mnvla - - vRnosm - APPRO% PNOPERTV LINE - -SS- CRAMW SEWER UNE - -FU- FORCE MAIN - - W - WATER ONE - -OE- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - -UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - - UT- UNOERGROUND TELEPHONE - - G - GAS ONE - -ST- STORM DRAINAGE UNE or-O. ORAMTY SEWER CLEANOUT ® ® SEWER MANHOLE 0 (ID STORM MANHOLE x( )' HYDRANT ® e SHUT-OFF ® go CATOH BASN 'G. POWER POLE EDGE OF WOODS 1u1B CRC® RRNSIDN 12/5/05 SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA SITE PLANS DAm mWDTG NmmR NOV, 2004 > 1' - 20' C1.7 LRW. NO. 02250 --- T(I EXISTING USE AND —( r-- EGARAGE ITO BE REMOVED CUT EDGE OF EXISTING L I EXISTING'DRIVE �ro .D, PAVEMENT BACK A MINIMUM OF 1 FT. CLEAN AND COAT WITH �- BE RE? OVER EMULSION PRIOR TO PAVING RELOCATE ` i (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) I �p p 1 STOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT RELOCATE RELOCATE MAILBOX LVERT EXISTING EXISTRdG IVERT —�Zll MAILBOX SI-NEW RELOCATE EXISTINGMATCH EXISTING - - 4" WHITE B" YELLOW" — GMp PAVEMENT ,-� DOUBLE 4" LINE YELLOW _ MATC}i EXISTING ' PAVEMENT MARKINGS I I I WHITE 7NZE STING EDGE I I OF PAVEMENT ` TO REMAIN 1 SAW CUT PAVEMENT, — CLEAN AND COAT WATH EMULSION PRIOR TO PAVING EXISTING BASE MATERIAL REMOVE EXISTING BASE MATERIAL TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT TRANSITION FROM NEW FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT to EXISTING FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT N.T.S, a , — Q \ `REMOVE EXISTING "°"' I^ EXISTNG EDGE RELOCATE WHITE UNE 4" WHITE PAVEMENT MARKINGS IAS REQUIRED OF PAVEMENT EXISTING GMP POLE UNE I PEDESTRIAN ADVANCE PEDESTRIAN EXISTING HEDGE TO BE7 1 CROSSING SIGNS REMOVED AS NECCESARY \PEDESTRIAN ADVANCE WARNING CROSSING SIGN ((PER WARNING CROSSING SIGN (PER MUTCD) FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS MUTCD STANDARD) `PER MUTCD STANDARD) WIDE PEDESTRIAN YELLOW EXISTING EDGE \70' CROSS WALK LINES ` OF PAVEMENT TO REMAIN SPEAR STREET TURN LANE PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1 "=40' SITE ENGINEER: t" CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, Y7 05482 002-8 232S FAX. 8UR0&S2 ' wg➢ wH'n.cea ,Rcum, / ollFllj,� PJM SAV SAV PROJECT: ----- --- ---- SPEAR 3q2- I / 3 MEADOWS - - -" MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT / SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON — —Ss— — — { VERMONT MATCH EXISTING r -L- PAVEMENT MARKINGS DOUBLE IV I 1 IERUAr — — — LINES ADJUST EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 1 TO BE REMOVED I TO NEW GRADE PEDESTRIAN '-NEW E 1CROSSING SIGN OF PAVEMENT I I / I I / I EXISTING ROAD, CURB Ec I -% SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED (REGRADE AREA TO DRAIN ADJUST EXISTING I _ SEWER MANHOLE TRANSITION 10' WADE / _ - TO NEW GRADE RECREATION PATH TO S' WADE SIDEWALK EXISTING CATCH BASIN NEW CA �_ SIN //' TO BE REMOVED I ----..�RIMe395.5';� I / (EXTEND FOUNDATION I 1NV>•3�9.5�,;,`., I DRAINS INTO NEW K CURB AND PAVEMENT WIDE SIDEWALK WADE ALK W MAMPS e�- 2 MAIN) I (cG UKG SIKUIUKL - AND CROSSWALK / e ITo TIE I " YAf: I PROPOSED DRAINAGE, $° ADJUST COVER TO I / NEW GRADE) �jti J u✓ a.._ a, CUL—DE—SAC IMPROVEMENTS PARTIAL SITE PLAN 1"=40' LEGEND - _._.... ExIrnNG CONTOUR ENSIWa &IS- cROPGaFv PROPOSED CONTOUR - -SS- GRAVITY SEWER LINE -FM- FORCE MAIN - - - WATER UNE - -W OE- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - -UE- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC -- -UT- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE -- --- G - GAS LNE -- -ST- STORM DRAINAGE UNE 000. GRAVTY SEWER CLEANOUT © I& SEWER MANHOLE ® ® STORM MANHOLE Z( HYDRANT ® ® SHUT-OFF ® ® GATCH BASIN 'o. POWER POLE rvvwwvy� EDGE OF WOODS OATH CB[Cim RRWADN t/5/051 SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL TURN LANE and CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENTS OATS DRAIIWG NOFm¢R NOV., 2004 AS SHOWN C1.V PROD. HO. 02250 TOPSOIL. RAKE. UNPAVED PAVED SEED & MULCH NOTES: ° 1. Typical trench for Water, sewer, and drainage pipe. __ .000000pOo -_ -- 000p Ooo pO� o00000000°co°o°o°o°o° 000°Op 2. Compaction of backflll and bedding shall a O°o°000 °o°°oopOo°pOo° minimum of 9dens underrrooroadway surfaces) - -_-- -oo of maximum dryry density determined in the ..' standard proctor test (ASTM D698). N 3 - APPROVED BACKFILL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3. Bedding material sholl not be placed on frozen IN 8" LIFTS subgrade. 0 v 0 cJ 2" OF RIGID INSULATION 4. Approved backflll shall not contain and stones i z TO BE INSTALLED WHEREVER more than 6' in largest dimension, 2 maximum MINIMUM COVER CANNOT diameter within 2' of the outside of the pipe, _ BE MAINTAINED & ALSO or any frozen, or organic material. APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER 5. Trenches shall be completely dewatered prior to PIPE placing of pipe bedding material and kept -- dewatered during installation of pipe and backflll. 6" ,0000 6. The sides of trenches 4' or more in depth entered a THOROUGHLY COMPACTED by personnel shall be sheeted or sloped to the defined by O.S.H.A. standards. c o°Oo o- BEDDING MATERIAL angle of repose as 6" °po o°ooa° o 000 7. Bedding material for wastewater lines shall consist of 3/4" crushed stone. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ROCK For water lines bedding material shall be sand. Submit a sample to the Engineer for approval. TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL 6. In trenches with unstablematerials, trench bottom shall first be stabilized by pplacement of N.T.S. filter fabric then crushed stone (3/4" maximum). ALL JOINTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED SMOOTH CUT EXIST. SIT. AND COATED WITH PAVEMENT PRIOR TO PAVING EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PRIOR TO PAVING EX. BIT. PAVEMENT (BOTH SIDES) MATCH EX. PAVEMENT _ MIN. (MIN. 1 1/2TYPE III 2' TYPE 11) NOTES: ................................_..,..........:::....... .. ... .... .. ;..,' .. _......_........_.... .... ... .... ... 1?'AIENT ... ..... ... 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AT LEAST ONE- WAY TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES DURING WORK WITHIN {� ((�� O0 Q'yf. _ (t?BOAS 0 0 MATCH EX. SUBBASE I L%� 00 �O O 0 O CRUSHED 00 THE R.O.W. 2. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC DURING THIN THE HIGHWAY R.O.W. SHALL BE �� 0 OD O O 0019- Gf AVMIN. 0000 0 OO O 0 O 0 WDR PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL OF 0 T UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. _ I— WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION SIGNING IN PLACE. 3. ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE MADE IN SIX (6-) LIFTS D } 2' TRENCH r SEE TYPICAL AND COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY ACCORDING TO ASTM EXCAVATION MIN. TRENCH DETAIL D696. 4. REPLACE EXISTING ROAD STRIPING AS NECESSARY. REPLACEMENT OF EXIST. PAVEMENT NTS 3' VENT w/ BIRD SCREEN WATERTIGHT C.I. COVER 3' GALV CAST INTO CONCRETE PIPE (OR APPROVED EQUAL) CONTINUE CABLE IN CONDUIT NEMA 4 TO CONTROL PANEL AND 'UNCTION 36" 0 RISER ALARM. AUDIO & VISUAL BOX ALARMS SHALL BE PROVIDED 1000 GAL. PRECAST UNION .' CONCRETE TANK - ASPHALT COVERED GATE VALVE GROUT CHECK VALVE SUBMERSIBLE SEWAGE 4" SOR 35 PVC GRINDER PUMP. (PUMP MODEL TO BE BY ENGINEER) 2" SCH 40 PVC ,. `PIPING TO MOUND_ 1/4" PER FT. SELECTED (MIN.) FROM •: SEPTIC TANK .,... ,. rory IT ANTI -VACUUM VALVE SET PUMP FLOAT FOR ALARM FLOAT 180 GALLON DOSE - N1DE ANGLE MERCURY SWITCH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o° O O�O�O�O°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O°a°oao 004 6' 6" MIN. COMPACTED CRUSHED GRAVEL -VERIFY PUMP REQUIREMENTS WITH THE ENGINEER IF FINAL SITE SELECTED IS OTHER THAN SHOWN ON PLAN 1000 GALLON PUMP STATION DETAIL N.T.S. MANHOLE WALL MANHOLE OPENING ABOVE !'-0" MIN. tZIUS PLAN LEBARON FRAME & COVER LC266 TYPE C OR EQUAL ADJUST TO MEET FINISH GRADE. FINISH GRADE SUM SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED & SEAL JOINT PRECAST RISER SECTIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS F SHALL NOT BE USED) w In POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE V 24' STEPS 0 8" O.C. WATERTIGHT JOINTS USING o 4 MASTIC OR RUBBER GASKET w 48' COAT EXTERIOR OF ENTIRE MANHOLE WITH A WATERTIGHT SEALANT (2 COATS) w CAST IN PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES OR APPROVED EQUAL a w y 1' RISE (TYP. ALL PIPES) 1 jOo` CONCRETE FILL TO 000 °c HIGHEST CROWN OF PIPE 0o 12" MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ROCK 6" MIN. CRUSHED CLASS B C_— 7 ONCRETE STONE BEDDING SHELF AND INVERT ELEVATION NOTES 1. INVERTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ONLY AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF LEAKAGE TEST. 2. EXTERIOR JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED ONLY AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF LEAKAGE TEST. 3. INTERIOR JOINTS SHALL NOT BE GROUTED. 4. IF DEPTH OF MANHOLE IS i OR LESS FROM RIM TO CENTERLINE INVERT, THEN A FLAT TOP SHOULD BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE CONE SECTION. TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE N.T.S. DED SDR 35 H I1 II �PLUGAW/ COUNTER SUNK SCREW CAST IRON VALVE CLEANOUT BOX BOX TOP SECTION INDEPENDENT w/COVER MARKED 141—OF PIPE SEWER" * CLEANOUT TO BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF BEND(S) IN BUILDING SEWER(S) WHEN 4" SDR 35 PVC 45' WYE 45ANCE I EEXCEEDS DIRECTION (USELONG SWEEP FITTINGS WHEN EXCEEDING 45') FLOW 1ii= IL-' 4" SDR 35 PVC CONCRETE CRADLE w/ 3 MIL POLYETHYLENE PLACED BETWEEN PIPE & CONCRETE TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. SLOPE MANHOLE OPENING ABOVE EXISTIN( SEWER I EXISTING SHELF AP EXISTING LINE — 2'-0' MIN. RADIUS LINE ' I I —REMOVE EXISTING SEWER MAIN ICENI AS REOUIRED AND INSTALL NEW MANHOLE, REPAIR SEWER MAIN AND SEAL LINE AT MANHOLE PLAN WITH GROUT AND REFORM INVERT IN MANHOLE. MANHOLE AND USE TRESS SEAL GASKET APPROVED EQUAL) FOR MGHT CONSTRUCTION OPOSED 8" SDR 35 NER CONNECTION EXISTING CONCRETE NO FORM NEW INVERT ELEVATION CONNECTION TO EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE N.T.S. 45" PLAN 30' SDR 35 PI SWEEP FITTING DISTANCE TO VARY-T SWITHEW DEPTH OF SEWER `\�\y/�` R SEWER MAIN 4- 22 1/2 OR 4455ELBOW 4' MIN. SOR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE. CONTINUE TO BUILDING O MIN. SLOPE - 1/4' PER FT. TEMP. END TO BE PLUGGED WITH 4" PVC WATERTIGHT PLUG AND MARKED W/ 4'o PVC PIPE EXTENDING FROM SEWER TO 2' MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 2' MIN. 4" MIN. SOR 35 PVC SEWER SERWL'E TEMPORARY PLUG SLOPE t. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ELEVATION SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION NTS • CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3 LOCATION TIES TO END OF LATERAL TO BE INCLUDED ON "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS. (IF CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CONCURRENT WITH LATERAL) • SEE TYPICAL TRENCH FOR BEDDING AND BACKFILL REQUIREMENTS. JI'I'F: CNIi1NCI1R: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 495 SHELBURNE, VT OSM eoas4szsz3 raw eoz•9eszzn xea wlw.°m,ccom DBAIIN ,`� OF V PJM y�q• °96CT(® 45228 3AV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT R6 Ox 12/5/05 SAV I RNAL PLAN SUBMITTAL. SEWER and SITE DETAILS seTX ssAlnsc nvxsel NOV., 2005 AS AS SHOWN co n PROT. R0. 02250 r' 1 1 PLUG HYD::: DRAINARSE CO.. OL OR PEASTONE TO 1 CY VOLUME 6" MIN. 1 THRUST BLOCK AWWA HYDRANT, VALVE AND APPURTENANCES AS PER SPECS ADJUSTABLE IRON VALVE BOX W/LID MARKED "WATER" FINISH GRADE Note: All work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, and the Village of Jericho. Details should be modified to the above reference specifications. REDUCING ANCHOR TEE THRUST BLOCK ANCHOR COUPLING OR SPOOL PIECE `-UNDISTURBED WITH MEGA -LUG GLANDS SOIL 6" M.J. RESILIENT 3/4" CRUSHED STONE FOR WEDGE GATE VALVE VALVE SUPPORT NOTES: 1. ALL BRANCH PIPING AND FITTINGS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. 2. HYDRANTS SHALL BE LABELED "ND". FOR NONDRAINING ON THE BONNET FACING THE ROADWAY. 3. ALL FITTINGS ARE TO HAVE MEGA -LUG RETAINER GLANDS. 4. PRIOR TO POURING THRUST BLOCKS ALL FITTING ARE TO BE WRAPPED WITH 4 MIL. POLYETHYLENE. TYPICAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION N.T.S. HIGH STRENGTH NON -SHRINK GROUT LEBARON LF248-2 24" x 24" C.I. GRATE w/3 FLANGED FRAME (OR APPROVED EQUAL) CONCRETE CURB SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED BITUMINOUS GONG. I PAVEMENT (1/4"/FT. NEW CURB SHALL REST .�,,;,,„,._; .,e.--'---= SLOPE MIN.) ON TOP OF BASIN COVER -ADJUST HEIGHT OF CURB _ 12" AS REQUIRED •� MAX. PRECAST CONCRETE W/MONOUTHIC BASE WATERTIGHT JOINT USING 1" -� MIN. WIDTH FLEXIBLE GASKET (SEAL EXTERIOR JOINTS AND LIFT HOLES ./NON SHRINK GROUT) 4" x 24" 48" UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLAN a 18" SUMP 6" MIN. CRUSHED GRAVEL _ oocoo * PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC. C478 (LATEST EDITION). TYPICAL CATCH BASIN 0 CURB N.T.S. `-PRECAST RISER SECTIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED) CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES 0 PIPE (SEE PLANS) WATER MINIMU BEWEEI SEWER 1" MAX FINISH GRADE ADJUSTABLE IRON CURB BOX W/UD MARKED "WATER" INSTALL A GOOSE Ll NECK LOOP CURB STOP CAMBR1OGE MUE252B (w AMBRASS) _... _......__ _ _ .. - q"x8"x16" SOLID MUELLER H-15008 W CONCRETE BLOCK 3/r TYPE "K" \ / COPPER SERVICE UNDISTURBED SOIL OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN WAR SERVICE CONNECTION SERVICE CONNECTION N.T.S. NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE WATER LINE AND THE SEWER LINE. IF THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, CONTACT THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR DESIGN REVISIONS. ALL REVISIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (WATER SUPPLY DIVISION). 2. MAINTAIN TV MINIMUM SEPARATION (HORIZONTAL) BETWEEN THE SEWER UNE AND WATER LINE 3. PROVIDE ADEQUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE SEWER/WATER LINE AT ALL CROSSINGS TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT OR ANY DAMAGE. WATER/SEWER CROSSING DETAIL N.T.S. LEBARON FRAME & COVER LC266 TYPE C OR EQUAL ADJUST TO MEET FINISH GRADE. -SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED & SEAL JOINT Ce CONE SETION OR 4' TRAFFIC COVER (HEAVY PRECAST RISER SECTIONS DUTY) FOR SHALLOW FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS MANHOLES SHALL NOT BE USED) B4• POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEPS 0 8" O.C. WATERTIGHT JOINTS USING '.4 MASTIC OR RUBBER GASKET F O ~ 48" UNLESS OTHERVAS am SHOWN ON PLAN COAT EXTERIOR OF ENTIRE MANHOLE WITH A WATERTIGHT SEALANT (2 COATS) z_w MIN 0 PIPE oa " (SEE PLANS) GASKETED FLEXIBLE a 1"' e WATERTIGHT CONNECTION 12" MIN.J UNDISTURBED-/ SOIL OR ROCK 6" MIN_ CRUSHED PRECAST CONCRETE OR STONE BEDDING POURED IN PLACE BASE SECTION TYPICAL STORM MANHOLE N.T.S. EFFECTIVE BURIED GALE VALVE MINIMUM ONE FULL SE MNG AREA (WITH CONCRETE - LENGTH OF PIPE SUPPORT VALVE �_'•' - & ANCHOR PLUG UNDISTURBED UN015NRBED SOIL VALVE/DEAD END REDUCER SOIL NOTE PLACES MIL (MINE) .14 POLYETHYLENE ALL SHEET BETWEEN ALL CONCRETE PIPE BLOCKS AND FIFE AND/OR FITTINGS i0 PREVENT BOND. • UN. RSED 90•, 5', 22 7 2• SOIL UNDISTURBED TEE Sal OR 11 1/4' D N.T.A NTS MINIMUM AREA OF BEARING SURFACE OF CONC. THRUST BLOCKS BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 12' MAX. PRECAST CONCRETE W/MONOUTHIC BASE 3" 4" 6" 8" 12" Sal COND171M SAFE BEARING LOAD 60' & E18. 45' 226' D3. El8 90' & E18. 46' 22S EMi. FTB. 90' & 68. 45' 225' ELB. EIB. 80' & ELB. s9' 223' E18. ELB. DO' 45' 22Y 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 f.0 0.5 20 2.5 1.5 1.0 4.0 5S 3.0 1.5 SOUND SHALE 10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 05 1.5 20 1.0 0.5 3.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 AS 8.5 3.5 2.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 2.0 4,GD0 IG 1.31.0 0.52.0231.51.03.55.03.01.36.08.35.025 IN 18.51a05.0 3.000 1.5 25 1.5 1.0 25 3.3 20 1.0 5.5 T.5 3.5 . ]. 15.0 d0 2DSH GO 3.0 4.5 25 1.5 6.0 20 10.515 AO 0.0 t8.0 S. 16.0 7.0 39. 0 15.0 SOFT CLAY 1,000 MA%IMUM WAhR PRESSURE a 300 P51 NOTE: REDUCER BEARING AREA - 45' BEND OF LARGER PIPE THRUST BLOCK DETAILS N.T.S. LEBARON LF248 24" x 24" C.I. GRATE ./4 FLANGED FRAME (OR APPROVED EQUAL) SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED PRECAST RISER SECTIONS 7PLAN FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED) WATERTIGHT JOINT USING 1" MIN. WIDTH FLEXIBLE GASKET (SEAL EXTERIOR JOINTS AND LIFT HOLES w/NON SHRINK GROUT) CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES SLTE ENGINEER.: r_ aVt6 ENGINUMNG ASSOCIATES. INC, P.O. BOX4B5 SHELBURte Vr 06-M M0 2=i FAX �22l1 N uwV.ee1� Da- PJM 44TEY A MCI8 a /5226 k SAV APPROVED /a,,rnr L PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 0 PIPE (SEE PLANS) " SUMP g,"�.•j1 6" MIN. CRUSHED GRAVEL *PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURES /'�® 'y) SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC. lr C478 (LATEST EDITION). TYPICAL CATCH BASIN N.T.S. all a� aW DATB CBRCR® RMHION � qy �o NOTES: FINISH GRAD Eli 1. TAPPING SLEEVES AND VALVES ON CWD TRANSMISSION MAINS ARE TO ADJUSTABLE IRON VALVE BOX WITH COVER MARKED "WATER" MEET THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR TAPPING SLEEVES AND TAPPING TAPPING SLEEVE TAPPING VALVE jl�l.V VALVES" DATED NOVEMBER, 1992. PLAN SUIRMIi AL ALL OTHER TAPPINGSLEEVES ANDFINAL VALVES ARE TO MEET APPROPRIATE EXISTING 24" MECH. JOINT WITH "MEGA -LUG" WATER and STORM DETAILS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS WATER MAIN RETAINER GLAND OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. WET TAPS SHALL BE PREFORMED BY PRE -APPROVED FIRMS ONLY. 3/4" CORPORATION IN FIRST LENGTH OF PIPE FOR TESTING 3. ALL FITTINGS THAT ARE TO HAVE CONCRETE POURED AROUND THEM ARE TO BE WRAPPED WITH 4 mt. \ NEW 8" D.I. PIPE POLYETHYLENE PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. ood go" "sa �3/4" CRUSHED STONE CONCRETE BEDDING (MIN. 12" THICK) DATR DRAwR+G NDAfDER THRUST to K NOV., 200E (SIZE DETER IVIED 4 MIL POLYETHYENE BY SOIL CONDITIONS) BETWEEN FITTINGS AND CONCRETE AS TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE DETAIL ASSHOWN PROt. N0. NTS 02250 1 3 1/4" BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 1 1/4- TYPE III FINISH COURSE 2" TYPE II BASE COURSE ——COMPACTED SUBGRADE_____ STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFl 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL TYPICAL ROAD SECTION N.T.S. 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS 2 1/2" TYPE If BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SIDEWALK n a 000O o0000000o00000000000°00000000000000 O°OHO°O°O°O°O°O°p O°O°O ° O°O O°O 6" 10" GRAVEL SUSBAS 6^ STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFl UNDISTURBED SOIL OR APPROVED COMPACTED GRANULAR Fl 50OX OR APPROVED EQUALRILL BITUMINOUS CONCRETE RECREATIONAL PATH DETAIL N.T.S. SIDEWALK WIDTH OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK e. 0 000 0 o 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 0 0 6" B` GRAVEL SUBBASE 6^ STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFl UNDISTURBED SOIL OR APPROVED 5DOX OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL NOTES: 1. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PREFORMED JOINT FILLER (1/4 CORK OR BITUMINOUS TYPE) 2. BETWEEN EXPANSION JOINTS THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE DIVIDED AT INTERVALS OF FIVE FEET BY DUMMY JOINTS. TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL N.TS. STORM (TYP) -SEE PLANS J /O WATER (TYP) -SEE PLANS SEWER (TYP) - SEE PLANS J TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 1/2" = P-0" 3 1/4" BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1 1/4` TYPE III FINISH COURSE 2" TYPE II BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUBGRADE- - STABIUZATION FABRIC MIRAFl 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL CONCRETE CURB 1' MIN. TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE OR BRICK PAVERS 1/2" R. 6" (SEE ARCH. PLANS) 3 BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 24 �5^ pe 7 r- :. o00000000po oop000000o0o 6• op0000i, 0 4" TOPSOIL > o� �° ! ocCRUSHED GRAVEL BASEoo � � o°o o° 0 0 o O p^ 000p° CRUSHED GRAVEIII y-.-:::ds::::.:F-:=.%:±::: �/i /i TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT ROADWAY SECTION w/CURB NJ S. 711E TOP OF CURB (SEE PLAN END TRANSITION - FOR TYPE OF CURB) SLOPE [— BEGIN TRANSITION /—FACE OF I SLOPE / CURB 6'-0" -FINISHED GRADE OF ROAD PAVEMENT TRANSITION CURB N.T.S, g' 16' DRIVE CURB CUT (TYP) - SEE PLANS 6' BEGIN TRANSITION SLOPE SEE CONCRETE CURB DETAIL SEE ROAD �SEE TRANSITION SECTION DETAIL CURB DETAIL DRIVE CURB CUT DETAIL N.T.S 1. CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN IV SECTIONS WITH 1/8" JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2. CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2' SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK). 3. ASPHALT TREATED FELT TO BE USED BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CONCRETE CURB TOP. CONCRETE CURB w/SIDEWALK DETAIL N.T.S. TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE ENGINEEK: C CIVIL £HGIH££RING ASSWAT£S. INC. P.O. WX485 SHELBURNE VT 08488 OOAB862W FAX 80Y-085 71 xAb: Awvse4Kaom ORGAN ,`�OF . PJM SAV $e"F PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON VERMONT /p'X, DETAILS ��.. RRVIStON 1. CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN TV SECTIONS WITH 1/8" JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2, CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO ASHTO DESIGNATION M-133 (1 /2" pars DM- Nt3 FR SPONGE NOV., 2005 CONCRETE CURB DETAIL N.T.S. AS SHOWN �Z .G PROl. N0. 02250 5 cEkEw h0ns, 1. 1Mlid" drown do notpurport m cpnst orre resent all Wl/dss approdmeteadirey Them!,oupn�hoadcmdhall�flawrl MI6IXy bce7ons �r°roa'csai ]233) pro o r� i�'�.svl�a �nuaceO1rols.�'�`sran 2 M ensuing ufilia"es not Intorrppoomrated Inm the Mel desgn ells// be sued or abandonedas I1M/eaffid on the ptens or'Oi".aemd by N,e En~. 3. The ContlacfgraW melnlaln as-bulff plans (wM flex) to, elf underwamtl utlliflns. moss pAvls shall be submMedm me Ownerat/!re camplroU_ o1 the plofecl. 9.CcRae n.s( or oMf/re 6. Aft ed areas &hail be mainpined unfit N!/ m is esbb//shed. grass •eve 6. Mal- ell heel outside of cplsDlxYion IGnits. 7. The Conracmrshall be rw^poralb/e for all work rvc-aty mr complefe d operabfo fac,T1Tles and ublitiai B. The Conusctor shell submit shop saolpwa1entl1PwWtlwmk Wwfl n/ot ablel gRen1ro1s erMN nlammdafs1 pdawg1Phvee granled. 9. O add/tlon ro me ufremerrs set In tfrese pAms errd speciftcatiens, Ma Comwo-actordsmeba!C9y oisoe`mrg ons�Puc MkWoiw srerpo�rds. Ia. ft. m elor Minglades f-lpavermmt-Ik-y. and lawn areas shall be 0_1 lebt 1t consleewleddWl>"elrame eo eroaor��slariba me tear n`acro man ea responslbllily 12. N/ she6 b evs6rq valvescovers eM grams wrh/n the crony IYoe fln e ad%usmdlo Mich. grade 13. �Th. C nractor eh / mll the gas, elechlrel and telephone -114 ei !n dance wrn mo wlny compan/ea ragulren,enLs. 14. ExhWnggp� oIt ae lwsoem%1 paveme sal � e pavement saw. 15. H mwe are any ronNcty w IrrcavuLsOar>r.Nas w/m me9=f ar lore6 work corrUlruas on Neon Ne fi- in questan- Erglnoer /or vadlPcadon MSSWALK DETAIL HANDICAP RAMP NOTES+ I. THE DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THIS STANDARD WILL BE ADHERED TO IN THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK RAMPS . WHERE SIDEWALKS RUN ADJACENT TO ROADWAYS ON STEEP (51/ OR GREATER) GRADES, RAMP GRADES WILL BE AS FLAT AS POSSIBLE ( ON LOW SIDE OF DRIVES AND INTERSECTING SIDE STREETS, RAMPS SHALL SLOPE TOWARDS DRIVE OR SIDE STREET 8 2% ) 2, NOMINAL RAMP DIMENSIONS, RAMP WIDTH - 54' MINIMUM RAMP SLOPE - 8.3% MAXIMUM FLARE SLOPE - 10% MAXIMUM RAID CROSS SLOPE -/ . A 20'. M XIMUM 3. A LEVEL LANDING (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TOP OF SIDEWALK RAMPS TO ALLOW FOR STOPPING AND MANEUVERING OF WHEELCHAIRS. 4. LEVEL LANDINGS AT THE BOTTOM OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPS SHALL BE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN MARKED CROSSWALKS, 5. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TRANSITIONS (GRADE CHANGES) AT TOPS AND BOTTOMS OF RAMPS AND FLARES. 6, VERTICAL DROP-OFF EDGES TO RAMPS WILL NOT BE BUILT UNLESS THE RAMP ABUTS AN AREA WHICH WILL NOT BE USED BY PEDESTRIANS, 7. NO VERTICAL 'LIP' OR 'CURB REVEAL' WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE THE RAMP ADJOINS THE ROADWAY, 8. AT MARKED CROSSWALKS, THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP OR LANDING SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN L S THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS. 9. WHERE POSSIBLE, RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE DIRECT LINE OF TRAVEL MOST LIKELY TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. 10. SIGNS, POLES, PLANTERS, MAILBOXES, ETC. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WHERE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF SIDEWALK RAMPS. 11. WHERE POSSIBLE, SIDEWALK RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED WHERE USERS MUST CROSS DROP INLET GRATES, MANHOLE COVERS OR OTHER ACCESS LIDS IF THIS CANNOT BE AVOIDED THEN GRATE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS. 12. CURB DRAINAGE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO PRECLUDE THE FLOW OF WATER PAST THE SIDEWALK RAMP. 13. WHEREVER FEASIBLE,TWO SIDEWALK PAWS ARE RECOMMENDED N O E DED I PREFERENCE TO A SINGLE RAMP. 14. JOINTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT SIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS, HOWEVER EXPANSION JOINTS WITHIN THE SIDEWALK RAMP AREA WILL BE AVOIDED WHEREVER POSSIBLE, 15. SIDEWALKS THAT ARE LESS THAN 5' WIDE REQUIRE 5' WIDE BY 5' LONG PASSING AREAS (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% CROSS SLOPE) AT INTERVALS NGT TO EXCEED 200 FEET. 16. E.G.P. = EDGE OF PAVEMENT 17. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMP STANDARDS DEPICTED HERE MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL LOCATIONS. FIELD CONDITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SHEET TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE ON ALTERATION PROJECTS AND WHEN STRUCTURALLY PRACTICABLE ON NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS REWIRED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. P.O. BOX 486 SMELBl1RNE, IT OSW IMM&M M DDRDES.YJT/ a ewry wavLeam DM" PJM c�cA7zD 18, IN ADDITION, ALL WORK MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAV CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONS PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT STANDARDS, - SAV SIDEWALK RAMP MIN. SINGLE WALK -STRAIGHT RAMP 8' MAX. CURB RAMP B' MAX. APPROACH TO PARALLEL RAMP. LEVELo 0 EXAMPLE 2 I SIDEWALK AND CURB �M[N, LANDING ROADWAY 24' a.; ROADVAY SEPARATED BY GRASS STRIP SURFACE SURFACE 50% MAX. �5.0% MAX. EXAMPLE I SIDEWALK ADJACENT B,3%MAXMAX ""-�-ADJACENT 9i MAX ADJACENT TO CURB DETECTABLE WARNING TO RAMP TO RAW LEVEL LANDING DETECTABLE WARNING DETECTABLE WARNING W/ DETECTABLE CURB RAMP WARNING B SECTION A -A SECTION B-B B RAMP • • ° ° ° • • SIDEWALK CURB TRANSITION nil I A 8.31 MAX. ° ° ° A GRASS 8.37. -��" 7'-0' MIN ° ° • STRIP MAX. CURB "124' CURB ._. _. CURB MIN, SECTION C-C TYPICAL HANDICAP RAMP - TYPE 1 N.T.S. EXAMPLE b PAIRED RAMPS AT I 24' 6' MIN. CORNER, CURB MAX. SIDEWALK VALKU 4'-0' MIN 8' �4'-�OVKJNI CBRB RAMP RAMP OTHERPLANTER DETECTABLE 4 ROADWAY TRST_, SA&E OBSTACLE A WARNING SURFACE PERPENDICULAR A _ RAMP IN URBAN - 2 8.3X SETTING -VIDE: 5.0 7, MAX. SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO DETECTABLE RAMP 4 WARNING SECTION A -A A CURB RAND RAID CURB TRANSITION CURB TRANSITDIN fLAfd= CURB RAMP �- DETECTABLE MI N. 7'-0' MIN � WARNING CURB 1004 MAX. erf,Tmu n_o t`rrTTPlu r_r EXAMPLE 2 SINGLE RAMP ON CORNER RADIUS. ' U 5 4' X 4' LANDING MAX - 2% CROSS SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION SEE NOTE 4 C �P CURB J CURB RAMP - W/ DETECTABLE WARNING EXAMPLE 3, RAMP ON TANGENT SECTION TYPICAL HANDICAP RAMP - TYPE 2 N.T.S. 4'-C' MIN. DETECTABLE WARNING BROGM FINISH ADJACENT DETECTABLE SURFACES FULL WIDTH (TYP.) IF RAMP WARNING i 6' MIN DETAILS 8' MAX. 4' DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT I DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 50% MINIMUM TO SQUARE PATTERN, PARALLEL ALIGNMENT 65% MAXIMUM OF BASE DIAMETER ADJACENT SURFACE OF RAMP / LEVEL LANDING (SEE OP' O O DETECTABLE L6' MIN. WARNING NOTE B 5) I-.- 0.9' MIN. 2,4' MAX. 1.4' MAX. O O DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS 0.65' MIN. .{ BASE TO DETECTABLE WARNING NOTES: BASE SPACING 1. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PAID FOR AS SPECIFIE➢ IN THE CONTRACT, 2. CONCRETE ADJACENT TO ALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH. 3. THE COLOR OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL PROVIDE A VISUAL CONTRAST TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AND SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 4, TRUNCATED DAMES SHALL BE ALIGNED ON A SQUARE GRID IN THE PREDOMINANT DIRECTION OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. 5. FOR SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOME PRODUCTS, A MAXIMUM 0.25' VERTICAL CHANGE W LEVEL IS ALLOWED. FUR CHANGES IN LEVEL BETWEEN 0.25, AND 0.50', A BEVEL WITH A MA;:IMUM le SLOPE IS REWIRED. CHANGES IN LEVEL GREATER THAN OSO' MUST BE TREATED AS A RAMP - 8,3% MAXIMUM SLOPE. 6, SEE THE CITY OF BURLINGTON FOR A LIST OF ACCEPTABLE DETECTABLE WARNINGS MANUFACTURERS FOR ANY WARNINGS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, DETECTABLE WARNING DETAILS N.T.S. PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT I17/5/0.51 SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL SITE DETAILS DATE DMDg1G NMIE. NOV., 2005 sceLs AS SHOWN C 2.3 taa. na. 02250 MINIMUM 1"0 ROCK PLACED AROUND AND PLACE FILTER FABRIIC TO THE TOP OF BETWEEN INLET GRATE CONCRETE BLOCKS AND FRAME CONCRETE BLOCKS PLACED AROUND _ CATCH BASIN !!!!!! WIRE SCREEN 0.5' OPENINGS !!!!!! PLACED AROUND CONCRETE BLOCKS CONCRETE BLOCKS STACKED 1 OR 2 LAYERS HIGH PLACED AROUND CATCH BASIN MINIMUM 1"0 ROCK WIRE SCREEN PLACED AROUND AND l^. w/ 0.5' OPENINGS TO THE TOP OF "r,.'.,,• - PLACED AROUND CONCRETE BLOCKS -- - CONCRETE BLOCKS GROUND CROSS—SECTION CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION (WITH CONC. BLOCKS) N.T.S. rA vm" N�,M LURB /A42T sPXtxar SmE,Nux GTCN H4SB/ SECTION A - A NOTES 1. PUCE CURB TYPE SED/NEw, B49RLEWs LW 6smr SYOPMG STRa7 SE AMIS NP/oPE NBTER CAN PG10 AAO ALLOW SWA/EM TD SEPARNTF FRall RLRrVFF. 2. S4AVSWS. OF ERNER BURLAP OR RMW a0la7XE MSS, ARE FXLED M"H GDN L UYERM AM PACKM D MLY. .i LFA4£ DAE smmmO GP AV THE TDP ROW TO P*VIW A S^XLW4Y FOR 012AFLOW. k AVS'PECT B4RRRR5' AND A kr SEVINEW AFM? EACH STORM EN7vT. SEPMAT AND 6Y4 M MAT BE RFAaYm FROM PIE 7M14240 MY NNLEMMLY. CURB INLET SEDIMENT BARRIER (SANDBAG) N.T.S. MATCH DITCH CULVERT & END SECTION SECTION s 4�N 2' 1 — EXISTING GRADE (MIN.) 18" TO 2'-0" SEE GRADING A -A TYPE 11 STONE FILL �— — SEE PLAN 1 �1 B TO BE USED PRIMARILY A WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS T TYPE 11 STONE SR FILL (NESS) MIN. L THICKNESS) STONE FILL STABILIZATION L TYPE 1, 1'-0" THICK MIN. FABRIC CULVERTTYPE 1 II, 2'-0" THICK MIN. END SECTION ~ A STONE LINED DITCH STABILIZATION FABRIC— CONTINUE STONE MIRAFI 50OX OR FILL IF REQUIRED N.T.S. APPROVED EQUAL 4' r �` ���•�r. •. .-�•.�L���� % III EMERGENCY SPILLWAY N.T.S. EXISTING GROUND — -- 1Y EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN TOPSOIL DITCHES /PROFILE GRADES EXCEEDING 51 STAPLE AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. GRASS LINED DITCH N.T.S. END SECTION DETAIL N.T.S. STONE FILL PAD N.T.S. 'n6lcmw, mm m4LWBLERr al S4NOY SOIL PROMW hOVa*N/AG WDF,VL r UIXUl CONPACIXW. STRAW ANCHORING NOTES 1. ,MCGNov sca'E ARTY BLXLDOZER. 2 sAaUra sT SEED AND FZRZZQSt .I S? RWW SMW .MACH 3- (7&—) A" (2 1/2 TONS PEN ACRE? A �S�Wcowv NUGp/ /NRl SLOPE BY R(MW/NG BUUl�OZER UP ANO STRAW ANCHORING N.T.S. NOTES BL SW1.S7tlL Z& L19MACT 2. APPLY PMAPAUVT Sa-AM 8EFORE PEAC/VO AMAW /S I MY BMAft-W LOOSELY AAV STAKE OR STAPLE M A940VZW GT8'C'T GVMACF MN THE SOIL DO AVT SMERYL If MIN. RUSHED STONE EXISTING GRADE CROSS-SECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. EROSION BLANKETS & TURF REINFORCEMENT MATS SLOPE INSTALLATION N.T.S. TEMPORARY STOCKPILE DETAIL N.T.S. POSTS 1. SET POSTS AND 2. STAPLE THE WIRE EXCAVATE A 4"XB" MESH FENCING TO ANGLE 10' TRENCH, SET POST WIRE POSTS. UPSLOPE FOR DOWNSLOPE. FENCING STABILITY AND SELF CLEANING 00' 12' MIN. 6' 3. ATTACH FILTER FABRIC 4. STAPLE THE WIRE TO THE WIRE FENCING MESH FENCING TO FILTER AND EXTEND IT TO END POSTS. FABRIC THE TRENCH. COMPACTE SA ILL T SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL N,T.s. SITE ENGINEER: f A CIVIL E1461NIMNG ASSOCIATES INC. P.O.BOX485 SNELBURNE, VT 05482 802012= TAX: 802-98522L1 web: www.ceee+Acmn Dft" PJM SAV ° IOS226 ° APPROPEII {D� E�d' SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURUNCTON VERMONT s` c`jr'r J"a DATA CBBCIIHD ARVC3ION 112/5/051 SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL I EROSION CONTROL DETAILS UATH DRAl11NG NOYBRR NOV 2005 AS i V2. { AS SHOWN PROI. N0. 02250 SECTION 01040 - PROJECT COORDINATION PART - GENERAL 1,01 MEETINGS & PROJECT ACCESS A. The Owner shall be notified five (5) days prior to commencement of Work by the Contractor. B. The Cantactw will co ifinote with the Owner to arrange an -site pre-constmetion meeting prim to commencement of any work. Job superintendent , and Subcontractors shall be Laded In this meeting. C. The Contractor will coordinate Oil phosas of the Work, so as not to Interfere with the normal work procedures In the area. O. The Contmatm Mall conduct his work In Such a manner as to net interfere with or endanger work or traffic In areas adjacent to the construction area, except as permitted by the Caner. The Contractor half eo orange his construction operations as to provide amass far smergenoy vehicles and equipment to the work site at all tine. 1.02 LABOR A. The Contractor and Subcontractors will employ mechanics ekRled In their respective trades. S. All labor will be performed in a neat and workmanlike manner. 1.03 PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY A. The Contracter shall be responsible far Initialing, maintaining, and Supervising all O.S.H.A. Safety precautions In connection with the Work. B. Fine Protection: The Contractor shall take ill necessary precautions to prevent fires adjacent to the Work and Mall provide adequate facilities for extinguishing fires. The Contractm Mall also prevent fires In project related buildings and Man prevent the spread of fires to areas id outse the Ilmite of the Wok. C. Safety Precautions: Prim to commencement of Work, the Contractor shall be familiar with OR Safety regulations and practices appg.bi. with construction operation. No additional payments all be made far equipment and procedures necessitated by these Safety precautions. 1.04 INSURANCE A. Certificates of Mourne acceptable to the Owner Shell be filed with the Go.. prior to the commencement of the Work. 1.05 CORRECTION OF WORK A. The Contractor Moll promptly correct all Work rejected by the Owner as defective or as fagIng to conform to the CoMrwt Documents. The Cwtroctor Malt bear all mat of correcting Such rejected Work. 1.06 WEATHER CONDITIONS A. No Work shall be done when, In the opinion of the Owner, the weather is unsuitable. No conmets, earth backfill, embankment, or paving shall be placed upon from material. If them is delay or Interruption in the Work due to weather condition., the necessary precautions must be taken to bond new Work to old. B. Protection Against Water and Storm: The Controctar Moll take all precoutlwe to prevent damage to the Work by storms or by water entering the site of the Work directly or through the ground. In was of damage by storm or water, the Contractor, at his own expanse, shall make repairs or replacements or rebuild Such parts of the Work as the Engineer may require In order that the finished work may be completed as required by the Drawings and Specifications. 1.07 DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS A. All debris and excees materials, other than that which M authorized to be roused, become the property of the Contractor and MM be promptly removed from the property. The Contractor Mall receive title to ill debris and/m ex-ii. material, The Owner will not be responsible for any loss or damage to debris or excess material owned by the Contractor. 1.08 PROJECT LAYOUT A. The Contractor Shell be responsible for providing all neceeaary Survey staking. 1. Locate, and protect control points before starting work n the site. 2. Preserve permanent reference points during progress of the Work. 3. Establish a mk lnum of two permanent benchmark. an the site, referenced to data established by Survey control Points. O. Record location., with horizontal and vertical data, an Project Record Document. SECTION 0010 - SITE CLEARING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section includsa: 1. Remove Surface debris. 2 Clear site of plant life one grow. 3. Remove trees and Shrum. 4. Remove root system of trees and Shrubs. PART 2 - PRODUCTS Not used. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 PROTECTION A. Protect utilities that remain from damage. B. Protect tree. plant growth, and features designated to remain as Mal land-ming. C. Protect beach marks and existing Structures from damage m displacement. D. Use means necessary to prevent dust becoming a nuisance to the puali5 to neighbor. and to other work being performed on or near the Site. E Maintain .mess to the site at ail times 3.02 CLEARING A. Clear areas required far access to site and execution of Work. B. Remove trees and shrubs within orwa. as Indicated on the Plans. Remove Stumps, roots and top roots and other proj _ ims Ih* or greater in diameter to 2•-O' below the wmented Surfaces In cut areas and 2'-0" blow the exposed wbgrade In fill areas. 3.03 REMOVAL A. Remove debris, rock, and extracted plant fife from Its. B. The Contractor Mall coordinate Work with the Engineer and Owner In establishing Suitable areas within the property genus far depositing debris, rocks Intl extracted plant life. The Contractor Moll be responsible far bar 011ng (capping) and grading all waste Sites. 3.04 UNITIES A. Coordinate with utility companies and agencies as required. SECTION 02150 - EROSION CONTROL PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A Sectkm Indudea: 1. Thar wait under this Section includes but I. net limited to providing all labor, equipment and materials far the Inetallatkn of all required Site related oroslon central m rat. If not otherwise dfrectad on the plans, erosion control Mall be In Strict conformity with the latest revision of the 'Vermont Handbook for SIR Erosion and Sediment Central on Construction Sites'. B. Related sections: 1. Section 02210 - Site Earthwork 2. Section 02936 - Permanent Seeding 1.02 GENERAL NOTES A. Thar discharge of sediment laden water from the pro),.t Site if prohibited. All discharged water from dswatering operations Mali discharge into a temporary sedimentation trap ar "dirt bag' fester. B. Contractor Moll instal all ermlon control measures as depicted on plane and details Or as recommended by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, or Soil Gonserwtlon Servke, prior to any construction. Contractor shall also be responsible for Inspecting and maintaining all erosion control measure. until project is completed. C. Contractor Mall limit the eel disturbance and weed application dates to between May let and Septemor 15th. Sol disturbance oemring later than October 15th and prior to May tat will require approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. SRe work between October 15th and May 1st ing Involvnew earth disturbance will require specific approval (file by September 15th). D. All Stockpile motorlaI (topeog, borrow, etc.) Moll be protected by Sit fence in around the perimeter. Mulch Moll be applied to disturbed portions of stockpit s at the and of each construction day. Stockpile$ to remain In plum for more than 30 days Mall be seeded. Locate stockpile$ on the uplift side of the disturbed areas, if possible. During windy conditions, stockpiled material Shall be covered or watered appropriately to prevent wind erosion. E. Slopm greater than 1:3 Mall have erosion control netting Installed to stabilize the elope and reduce the eroalw potential- Install netting aver mulched slopes we that all parts are in contract with the soil and mulch. Pin netting With wire Staplae 3' 0. to eneum full banding with soft Surface. F. Install stone check dame In grass -lined aealew 50 fast an center to prevent silt from washing Into the drainage system during .... tru.0 n. Check dams Shall be removed anm wgetatlon Is established. G. Control dust through the application of calcium chloride or water. An average application of one pound of calcium chloride par square turd of exposad area should be considered for each treatment The exact number of applications and amount of dust controller shall be based upon field and weather conditions. it Malf be spread in Such marmer and by South devisee that uniform distribution Is attained over the entire area on which itis ordered placed. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 EROSION CONTROL NETTING A. Jute netting shall consist of undyed and unbleached yam woven Into a uniform open plain weow mesh. 2.02 EROSION CONTROL MATTING A. Whore required on the plane or where directed by the Engineer, erosion control bfankets (matting) Shag be North American Green C125 far ewdes, and SC1SO for Mope stabilimUon. or approved equal. 2.03 FILTER FABRIC A. khan filter fabric Is required, it shall conform to the requirements of Mid 50OX or approve egivdent. 2.04 CALCIUM CHLORIDE A. Calcium chloride shall conform to the requirements of AASHTO M 144. Either rZIm flake calcium chloride Type 1 m concentrated flake, pallet Or other granular calcium chloride, Type 2, may be used. Z05 WATER A. All water used Mall be clean and free of harmful amoUnta of sort. acid% alkalies. Sugar. Organic matter and other wbeteneea Injurious to the Milled product, plant life or the astabll h.-t of vegetation. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 CHECK DAM AND INLET PROTECTION A. Check done shall be Metalled in accordance with the project Mils, and Inspected weekly and following my min or melt t producing measurable runoff. B. Catch basins within and adjacent to construction areas Mali be protected in accordance with the details depicted an Sheet C-1+ Inlet protection shall be Inspected weeny, and Wowing my min ar melt event producing measurable runoff. 3.02 SILT FENCES A. The silt fences Mall be constructed In accordance with the construction detail. The form shall generally be placed 10 feet from the ten of the Slop. or as Mown m the plans. The ends of the fence Shill be placed uphill to farts a hormshee shop, to trap all runoff. B. The silt t ces shell be inspected weekly, and following rain for damage or build-up of sediments. All damaged fences shall be repaired or replaced. Sediment deposits Shall be removed from the fen., as they build up and be placed in an area where there is no danger of further erosion. 3.03 EROSION MATTING A. Erosion matting shall be placed on all gross-Ifned ditches with profile grades exmedIng 5.0% and Shell be placed and mahtoFed in ooaq'dance with the Vermont Agency of Transportation Standard Specifications Sections 654 and 755.07' 3.04 RESTORATION A. Disturbed areas Mall be topsoited, seeded, and mulched within 48 towns of final groanil• wises otherwise approved, as specified in Section 02936 - Permanent Seeding. 305 STABILIZED ROAD ENTRANCE A. A irtabilizad pad f crushed atone located at y point where traffic .RI be entering or leaving the construaton site to ar from a public right-of-way or street or as Mown on the drawings Mall be constructed for the purpose of preventing the tracking of sediment onto public rights -of -way. S. Design Criteri¢ 1. Use 1.5 to 2,5 inch stone. 2. Use 8 inch layer of atone. 3. Stone pad Shall be full width of entrance. 4. Minimum length Mall be 50 feet. 3.06 GRASS -LINED DITCHES A. All ditches that are not atone -lined shall be topsoited, waded, fertilized and mulched. Any area which Mows Signs of emolon shag be reseeded immediately and maintained until permanent vegetation fa established. 3.07 MAINTENANCE A. All erosion control measures Mall be inspected weekly and repaired Sad/or replaced as needed. B. All made. central m eer Mall be Inspected after any rain or melt event producing mmwraNO runoff. C. The stabilized read entrance shall be top dressed with additional atone Should the eid.ting stone become clogged with Sediment D. Hay or show mulch Is Subject to wind action. Mulch may require anchoring as the weather conditions warrant. 3.08 WINTER CONSTRUCTION A. New all disturbance between September 15th and May tat all require epacfic approval from the Wctw Quality Division. The Contractor Mall identify any won areas non addressed by the current Erosion Prevention and Sediment Central Plan (EPSCP) in writing, to the Engineer by September 71h. No new disturbance In these areas will be permitted until approved by the Water Quality Division. B. Silt fence and other emslen control meawras requiring earth disturbance for installation shall be installed prim to September 15th, unless otherwise approved. SECTION 02210 - SITE: EARTHWORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Incldew 1. All utility and siteaomc excavation (antes. covered in other sections o1 these epecificotions), removal and stockpile c topsoR, and lIR don fabric, and other miscellaneous and appurtenant .mina. 2. Site flllrr . & Roadway/parteln9 let Structural sections. 1.02 REFERENCES A. ANSI/ASTM C136 - Standard Test Method far Stew Anelysls of Fine and Co.- Aggregates. B. ANSI/ASTM D898 - Standard Test Method far Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Sol Using Standard Effort. 1.03 PROTECTION A. Protect bench marks and existing structures. S. Protect above and Leakier grade utilities which are to remain. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. Testing laboratory reports indicating that malarial far backfRI meets requirements of this Section. B. Field density test reports of site fill in Plata C. Field density teat reports for roadway structural sections in Place D. Stabl(zatien Fabrt.: Submit copies of manufacturer's Spadficotfons and installation Instructions. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 BANK RUN GRAVEL A This material Shall ..at the following grading requirements: Percent by Weight Sieve Designation Passing Square Mean Sieve No. 4 20 - 60 No, 100 0 - 12 No, 200 0 - 6 The gravel shall be uniformly graded from coarse to fins and the maximum size Stone particle shalt not exceed 2/3 of the thfoknwir of the layer being placed or 4", whichever fs I.... Z02 CRUSHED GRAVEL A. All material. Mall be .-red from approved 'Our- This ,.,.Wereved anmck of ou uniform quaangular tity throughmtfrrgments e.Sa tNyf free frorn Min along ad piece. Soft ar diehtagmted ston. dirt, organic or other objectionable matter. This material shall insist the following grading requirements: Percent by Weight Stew Designation Passing Square Mesh Slew FTnw2" 100 1 1/2' 90 - 100 No. 4 30 - 60 No. 100 0 - 12 Go-. 4' 95 - 100 No. 4 25 - 50 No. 100 0 - 12 No. 200 0 - 6 2.03 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE A. Aggregate for surface courts and Shoulders shall consist of dean, hard gravel, c-,ad gravel or crushed atone. It Mali be reasonably free from elk loam, clay or organic matter. It shall be obtained from approved sources. S. Grading. This material shall be uniformly graded from ooar8e to fine and Shall meet the following grading requirements: Percent by Weight Sieve Designation Passing Squares Mesh Siova 1/2' 100 90 - 100 No. 4 45 - 65 No. 100 0 - 15 No. 200 0 - 12 2.04 COMPACTED FILL/GRANULAR BORROW A. :1. material Mold l be free of Mole, ay. friable ateekX, debris, and arganfc matter, graded In accordance with ANSI/ASTM C136 within the following Ilmite: Percent by Weight Steve Designation Passing Square Mesh Sieve 8" 100 3/4" 75 - 100 N. 4 20 - 100 Na. 100 0 - 20 No. 200 0 - 12 2.05 GEOTEXTItE STABILIZATION FABRIC A. This work Mall cmtsiert of fumlehing and placing an approved stabilization fabric on a prepared Surface within the limits Mown an the plane. The fabric Mall meet, or azceed the following prapertfew: 1. Grab tensile atringth (ASTM D-4632) - 2. lb. 2. Grab te..Be siwgotlon (ASTM D-4632) - 15% 3. Puncture strength (ASTM D-4833) - 120 lbs. PART 3- EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION A. Identify required Imes, newt% contaure, and datum. S. Identify known below grade utilities. Stake and flag lemtion. C. Maintain and protect existing utilities remolning which pass through work am. D. Upon discovery of unknmm utility or concealed conditions, discontinue affected work; notify Engineer. 3,02 EROSION CONTROL A. Erosion control must be installed prior to beginning any .mthwork operatim. 3.03 TOPSOIL EXCAVATION A. Excavate topsoil from orand . to be axcoveted, re -landscaped or directed eedy the Engineer. In areas designated on Bite or as B. Maintain the stockpile In a manner which will not obstruct the natural flow of drainage. 1. Maintain stockpile free from debris and ep train. 2. Kethe topsoil damp to prevent duet and drying cot. 3.04 SUBSOIL EXCAVATION A. E. -to subsoil from areas to be regraded In accordance with plans. B. Excavate wbsol required to accommodate binding fmndatlana, etube on grade. site atruMUres, c-iftuctlm operation., roads, and parking areas. C. Grade top perimeter of excavation to prevent surface water .from draining into excavation. D. Notify Engineer of unexpected subsurface conditions and dfacanthus affected work in arm until notified to resume work. E. Correct auras over -excavated by rarer as directed by the Engneer at no cost to the Owner. 3.05 DITCHES A. Gut accurately to the mass -sections, grades, and elevations Mown. B. Maintain exmwtions free from detrimental quantities of leavers, sticks, trash, and other debris until completion of the work. C. Dispose of excavated materials as shover an the drawings or directed by the ..He Engineer, ezcept On not, in any case. deposit materials lees than throe feet from the edge of a ditch. 3.06 EMBANKMENTS AND BERMS A ft. embankments ors to be made an a hllsWe, the slope of the original ground on which the embankments are to be mnwtuctsd Mall be stepped ond propedy drained os the fill is constructed m that unwise movements of theelopes do not occur. B. Any excavated rode, lodge, boulders, and stme, except where required In the construction of other Hems ar otherwise directed, shell be used M the construction of embankments to the extent of the project requirements and generally Mall be placed so as to form the base of an embankment. C. From material shall not be used in the construction of 7bmkment% nor shall the embankments or wccessiw layers the embankments be placed upm from material. Placement of material other than rock shall stop when the sustained air temperetur% below 32 degrees Fahrenheit, prohibits the obtaining of the required compaction. If the material Is the ... a...ptable, it shall be stockpiled and reserved far future use whan Its condition Is acceptable for .sah embankment.. D. When an embankment is to be constructed across a swamp, muck, or areas of unstable cols, the unsultabie material shall be excawted to reach soils of adequate bearing capacity and the embankment begun. A ternatNe method. Such as use of a stabAtzation fabric in place of excavation and backfll, may be utlized only after approval of some by the Engineer. E. Material being placed in embankments shall be placed in horizontal layers of uniform thickness across the full width of the embankment Stumps, trees, rubbish, and other unsuitable material Shall not be placed In embankments. F. Embankment areas Mall be placed In eight -inch IRS. Effective spread 9 equipment shall be used on each layer to obtain uniform thickness prim to compaction. Each layer Mali be kept --ad to shed water, to the outside edge of embankment and continuous leveling and manipulatem SRI be required to assure uniform density. The an We ores of each layer Mall be uniformly compacted to of leant the required minimum density by use of eompactim equipment conelating of milsro, compactor', o reof. a combination the. Earth -moving and other equipment not we Meetly manufactured for wmpactfon purpose. will not be considered as compaction equipment. G. All fill materiel Mall be compacted at o moisture content Suitable for obtaining the required density. In no wee Mall the moisture content k, ...h layer undo c00etm.ilan be more than three percent above the optimum moisture content and Mall be lees than that quantity that will cause the embankment to become unstable during compaction. Sponginess, Shoving, Or other displacement under heavy equipment Mall be considered evidence for an engineering determination of look of Stability under this requirement, and further placement of material in the area affected shall be stopped or retarded to allow the material to stabilize. H. When the moisture content of the material h the layer under construction 1. less then the amount necessary to obtain satisfactory compaction by mechanical compaction methods, water shall be added by prawwro distributor. or other approved equipment. Water may also be added in exaawtfon or borrow pit.. The water Mall be uniformly and thoroughly incorporated Into the soil by disc, harrosing, binding, or by other approved methods. This manipulation may be omitted for Sande and grovel. When the moisture content of the material is In excess of three percent above optimum moisture content dry material shall be thoroughly Incorporated Into the wet material, or the wet material .hall be aerated by disking, harrowing, bladfng, rotary mixing, or by other approved methods; compaction of the layer of wet material Moll be deferred until the layer has dried to the required moisture content by evaporation. 3.07 COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS A. All backfllle and Pole Mall be compacted In even lift. (12" maximum) to attain the required densities as follow.: Standard Proctor Location ASTM D-698 Subgrade and Gravel for Road. and Parking Lot. 95X General Embankment. 90% 3.08 MAINTENANCE A. All ear.hwork Mould be checked periodically to see that elope. are In good condition. Any rills er damage from erosion and animal burrowing Mould be repaired immediately to avoid further damage. If seeps develop on the elope. the area Mould be evaluated to determine if the seep will cause an unstable condition. Subsurface drahs or gravel mulching may be required to solve neap problem.. Diversion. borne, and waterways In the land grading mw Mould be checked to we that they are functioning property. Problems found during the Inspections should be repoked promptly. SECTION 02216 - S10RMIRATER MANAGEMENT C PART 1 - GENERAL - •, 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Construction of storm water detention pond. PART 2 - PRODUCTS A. Compacted FIR/Granular Borrow: The material far the fill .hail be obtained from the designated areas and Mall conform to the requirements of Section 02210 - Site Earthwork. The materal Mall be free from stumps, wood. bush, root. and. rubbish, and other matter that may decoy. It should be free of stares over 2 inches in diameter where compacted by hand m mechanical tampere, or Suer 6 inches in diameter where compacted by rollers or other equipment. Frozen material shall not be placed in the AI, nor Shull th. fill material be placed on . from foundation. B. Stone FRI: Stone fill shall conform to the requirements of Type i Store FRI as speoVied In Section 02439 - Stone FRI. C. Riser and Drain Pipe: Riser and droh pipe shall conform to the requirements of Section 02725 - Drainage. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 SITE PREPARATION A. The area to be coveted by the pond and embankments shall be cleared of all tree. brush. Stumps, roots and other objectionable m teriaL The area to be cowered by the earth embankment and the Surface of the borrow area shag be stripped of all grass• roots, organic materiels, or other objecBarnable materials to a depth that wni Insure the removd of any material. which will prevent bond between the foundation and the fit. Material cleared shall be dt.p... d f In .-red-- with Section 02110 - Site Cl-ing. Where the ambankment wit be an a hglaide, the elope a1 the original ground an which the embankments are to bar consbucted Shall be Stepped and properly chained as the fill . constructed So that adverse movement. of the stapes do not Occur. 3.02 COMPACTED FILL/GRANULAR BORROW A. Preparation of Foundation: Upon compaatim of the clearing operation and jest prior to placing the flll material on my portion of the foundation, that portion shag be scarified, plowed. or disked to a depth of 3 Inches. All objectionable material :,..ad by this operation Shall be disposed of outsde the limits of the All. S. Placing and Spreading Material: The placing and spreading of material shall be started at the lowest part of the Section under construction and the constructed conscted In toy- of 6 Inches. Th. toyer. Shall stop. Slightly towards the reservoir to prevent puddles and provide for faster unoff in wee of rain. Where Possible, the layers Mall extend over the entire area of the fill. The die". ti- SITE ENGINEER: r A GYiL ENGINEERING ASSOMTES. INC. P.O. SM486 SHELBURNE, VT o5462 10be062JZJ FAIL80985,1 ? swb:waw.ceaK- D&nm PJM SAV APPR.y.D SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BUfUNGTON VERMONT `j..' F WR C�aXBD 11EV®[ON 2A/Mi SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONS O'eT DMint a Ninfarre NOV., 2005 AS AS SHOWN C3.0 PRar. m. 02250 �J and gradation of the materials throughout the III[ shag be such that there be no lenses, pocket; streaks, or layer. of material differing substantially in texture as gradation from the surrounding material. The most porous borrow moterial .hall be placed on the down.trsem p.,U-a of the embankment. D. Compaction: All fill shall be compacted to 95% maximum density par ASTM D-698. E. Limit' The embankment shall be constructed where located and as detailed In the Contract Plane. Side slope Moll be 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. F. Revisions to the proposed design of the detention pand may be necessary If, In the opinion of the Engineer, unsuitable material Is found at the pond location. 3.03 SLOPE PROTECTION A. Placement Stan. FlII Type I shall be placed at locations Indicated an the plans to a minimum thickness of l'-0' In me me Inamanner toot will result In a reasonably wall graded,.- Care shall be taken In the placing to avoid displacing of the underlying material. The stones all be placed and distributed buted so that there will ben-cumula- tiana of either the large or the smalls, stones. Re- ar' arrangement of the stone fill by hand labor or mechanical equipment may be required to obtain the specified result,. SECTION 02225 - UTILITY TRENCHING AND BACKFILLNG PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Include,: 1. Trench, backfill, and compact as specified herein and as needed for Installation of n of underground utnlocated 5 feet outside the bulldings. 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A Use adequate numbers of skilled eskers who are thoroughly trained and experienced in the newasary wafts and who are completely fam➢lor with the specified requirements and the methods needed fw proper performance of the work of this sett... B. Use equipment adequate in size, capacity, and numbers to accomplish the work In a timely manner. C. Comply with requirements of govemmentol agencies having Jurisdiction. 1.03 REFERENCES A ANSI/ASTM C136 - Standard Test Method for Slew Analysis of Fine and Caere. Aggregates. B. ANSI/ASTIR D698 - Standard Test Method far Lobwatery Compaction Characterlatias of Sol Using Standard Effort. PARE 2 - PRODUCTS 701 SOIL MATERIALS A. Fill and backfill materials: 1. Fill materall le subject to the approval of the Engineer. Material provided can be removed ham awtions on site or Imported ham approved off-elte barow ar Materials must bib predominantly granular. nm-expansive Boll foe ham porous matter, organic matter and ether daletebus matte and contain no rode ar lumps over 6 Inches in greatest dimension. 2. Rocks having a d"Inslon greater than 2 inches shall not be pieced within 2 fast of the outside of pipe. 3. CoheNmless material used f- backfkl: Provide send free from -genic material and other foreign matter. and ale approved by the Engineer. PART 3 - EXECU11014 3.01 SURFACE CONDITIONS A. Examine the areas and candltons under which work of this oo Uon will be performed. Correct condition. detrgm ntal to timely and proper completion of the work. Do not proceed tint➢ unsatisfactory conditions are corseted. 3.02 PREPARATION A Identify required Imes love; contours, and datum 3.03 PROCEDURES A Existing Utilities: 1. Unless shown to be removed, protect active utility lines Mom an the drawings w otherwise made known to the Cothact., prior to trmchiknq. If damaged. repair or replan at no cost to the Own-. 2 When -let., underground utilities, which are not achede.d for ma owl or abandonment, we encountered! In the ti-widen, hall Mall be adequately supported and protected harm damage. Any damage to QUIltiss be repaired promptly at no additional coat to the Owner. 3. If utility service M fnterupted ale a result of work under this esctIon, lmmealbt-y testae secuce by repairing the damaged utility at no additional at to the own.'. 4. It existing utNitles we found to htefee with the permanerl facilities being constructed under this ,action, immediately notify the Engineer and secure instructions. 5. Do not proceed with disruption of service or permanent mI000Uon of utilities tint➢ ".fit- Instructions are received from the Enginaer. B. Protection of perems and property. 1. Bwrkadw open holes and depreaalans occorbng as pat of the work, anpost warning g lights an property adjacent to or and Public access. 2. Operate warning lights during hours ham dunk to dawn ach day and as otherwise required. 3. Protat structures, utilities sidewalle, pavemerls, and other fatalities hart damage c sed by attiemmt, lateral movement, washout, and other hazard. -sled by operations under this sect(-. C. D... tering: The Contractor, at all Unves, Mall conduct p-atian8 ,o ale to prevent the ac..W."wi of water. Lae, antl snow in exomattfm, or in the vicinity of saw wted --a; and to prevent rater ham Intertaring with the progress and quality of the work Under no condition, shall water be allowed to rise In open trench- after pipe has been placed. D. Accumulated Mate,, ke, and snow shall be promptly removed a disposed of by pumping or other approved meets Disposal Mall be carried out in a mmn- which will not irecte a hazard to public health, nor cause Injury to public w Prtwte property. walk completed orIn progress - public streets, nor cause or, Interference In the uw of .treats and road by the public Pipes under construction Man not be used f- drainage of .x-Votima. E Maintain access to odi cant areas at oil time. 3.04 TRENCHING A. Provide shooting and sharing necessary far protection of the work and far the safety of person at. 1. Sheeting end braalng required for trerches shall be removed to the al.."m of the pipe, but no sheeting wit be allowed to be pulled, removed, or disturbed below the pipe. B. A trench shall be excavated to the required depth and to a width sufficlant to allow for joining of the pipe and impaction of the bedding and backfill moterkl under and wound the pipe. C. The completed trench bottom shall be firm for Its full length and width. D. If Indicated an the plane or directed by the Engine-, poor foondatlen material encounmrad below the norm. at.. of the pipe bed mull be removed and replaced with granular backfi➢. E. where pipes are to be placed in embankment fill, the ezcovotlon Mall be made ate the embankment has been plated to a height of 3 feel plus the diameter of the pipe be. the designed grade of the pipe. F. Excavating fw ppu t---s 1. Excavate far manholes anal similar structures to a distmce sufficient to leave at teat 12 Inches door between outer surfaces and the embankment or sharing that may be used to had and protect the bank.. 2 Over -depth excavation beyond such appurterances that has not been directed wit be considered unauthorized. FM with sand, gravN, or lean concrete as directed by the Engineer, and at no addRlon. cost to the Owner. G. Excavation Mall not no with normal 45 degree bearing play of foundations_ H. where utility rune troveree public property or we subject to governmental or utility company jurisdiction, provide depth, bedding. cover, and other requirements as, set forth by legally constituted authority having jurisdiction, but In no case less than the depth shown in the Contract Document; I. where trenching occurs In existing lawn; remove turf In sectlons and keep damp. Replace turf upon completion of the backfilling. 3.05 BEDDING A. Pipe Bedding Area: Prior to laying pp,, bedding motwial ,hall be pieced to the limit, of the excavation and to a depth beneath the pipe as specified. This material Mall be either sand, gravel, or crooned stone and shall not contain large lumps and stones over one Inch In dlamatar. A9 the pipe la laid, bedding material shall be extended to 6 Inches above the pipe and lowed along the width of the trench. 3.06 BACKFILUNG A. Boek/nling shall not be done In freszing weather, with frozen materials, or ehm materials already placed are fro- B. Backidl material shall be evenly spread and compacted In lift, not more than 12 Inches thick as - approved by the Engineer. Previously pieced or new material, shah be moistened by sprinkling, If required, to ensure proper bond and compaction. C. Trmchas Mich have been imprpely backl➢led. MUoeed w --ad up tskm It hoe been approved shall oo en reoped. Refill and compact as, specified, ar otherwise uxract to the approval of the Engineer, at no additional cost to the Garner. D. Take special care in backfilling and bedding operations to not damage pipe and pipe coating; E. No compacting shall be done when the material Is too wet to be compacted properly, At such times the work shall be suspended until the PmAouxly placed and new materials haw dried out sufficiently to permit proper comtion, w such other precautions taken s may be necessary to obtain proper Campacim. F. Beckfll material sholl be compacted to the following percentages of maximum dry density and the In -place moisture content Mall not be more than 2% Mow the optimum moisture contort, tall by Standard Proctor ASTM D696. 1. Mt rd all structures, under roadway paving, shoulder and embankments - 95X 2. NI other area. - 90X. G. Frost Protection: Pipes laid with less than the minimum aver over vie crown and when approval by the Engineer Mall be protected against freezing by Installation of rigid Insulation far the width of the trench. Insulation Mal be minimum of 2 Inches thick with nadditional Inch of thick.. far every fat of depth of piping lees than 5 fat. The sheets shall be pfa..d 6 Inches above the crown of the sewer after compaction of the 6 Inch lift Immediately above the crown. Care shall be exercised by the Contractor during backfill and compaction over the Insulation. The Meets Mall meet the comp r..sive strength requirements of ASTM D1621-73. 3.07 TEST FOR DISPLACEMENT OF SEWERS AND STORMDRNNS A. After ire trerch has been backf➢led to above the pipe and has been compacted as specified, check sewers and stamdraket to determine whether displacement has occurred. B. Visually inspect pipe Installation by flashing a light between manholes or between the locations of the manholes, by means of a flashlight or by reflecting sunlight with a mirror. a If the Illuminated Interior of the pipe line Mows poor alignment, displaced pie; or my other defeats, -met the defects to the specified condition, and at no additional cost to the Owner. D. After visual pprowl of pipe, a 95% mandrel test may be required. SECTION 02400 - WORK ON OR NEAR PRIVATE PROPERTY PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. The work under this section Includes the prof= of private property and the restoration of mesa near w on private Property. (Far Furth- requirements wthe General Conditions and the Special Gonditlons of these specifications.) 1.02 SUBMITTALS A. Th. Contractor Mall, upon award of the Contract, take photographs of the existing condition In the project area. These photographs MM be taker ale directed by the Owner anal/or as T.loss 1. Any suitable camera may be ..ad. but the lens must be a tle( ers, having . fecal length of not more than hirty-five 2. Thal photographs shall be at least three and a half (3.5) Inches wide and five (5) inches long, colored, printed with a matted finish and boadedess. Each photograph shall be marked with the following Information m the back: Location Set! Date B. Upon completion of the project, the Contractor shall submit and set of photographs, taken as before, swing the conshowing ditions In the project area Each photograph shall be marked an the back oe apedfiad move. C. Approximately 10 each before and after photograph, w11 be required. 1.03 PROTECTION A. Every effort Mall be made to protect private or public Property during eanatru "k` All damaged tree; shrubs and oNer vegetation shell be replaeed In kind by the Contractor at no additional cat to the Own-. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A NI materials not specifically described, but required for work Included In this section shall be new, that quaky of their respective kinds. and subject to the approval of the Englnew. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 LAWNS A In areas where ramoVal of lawns is necessary le complete the work, he Contractor may decal to cut, remove and atookp➢e the sod and put it back at the -PI."" of the work, ar replace the sod with new sod. Seeding shall not be considered as an approved equal to either of the above altemati-s. 3.02 BUSHES A Bushes which are In the way of the construction and are located an private property shall either be removed, stared and replanted or shall be replaced at the option of the Owner. 3.03 PAVEMENT A. Existing driveway and parking areas shall be protected during the construction. Damaged paved areas outside the contract limits shall be neatly cut out and replaced with bituminous concrete to the complete ..U.faction of the Owner. SWIM 02439 -STONE FILL. PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Stone Fig - Types 1. It. Ill, and IV- 2. Rip -Rep - Heavy Type Light Type. 3. Ceotextile Fabric. S. This work shall consist of furnishing and placing protects materials (n conformity with the dinaneions, .[-time and at the locations indicated In the contract or as directed by the Engineer. 1.02 REFERENCES A VAOT Standard Specification, Section 700. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 STONE FOR STONE FILL A. Stone for atone fill shall be approved. hard, bloated angular rock other than erpentine rock containing the fibrous variety ch yeotile (bebestes). The least dimension of the atone Mail be greater than 1/3 of the longest dim ... In. The true fill .If be bly eel graded ham the smallest to the maximum he stone specified so as to fern a compact mane when in place. Type I: The longest dimension of the atone shall wry from 1 Inch to 12 Inches, and at last 50 percent of the volume of the store In place shall haw a [seat 41mmeian of far Inches. Type II: The longest dimension of the at-. Mall wry from 2 Inches to 36 inches, and at least 50 percent of the volume of the stone In place shall haw o least dimension of 12 Inches. Type III: The longest dimension of the store shall wry horn 3 inches to 48 Inches. and at last 50 percent of the volume of the stone In plow shall haw a last dimereion of 16 Inches Type IV: The longest dimension of the stone shall very from 3 inches to 60 knchas and at least 50 percent of the volume of the store In plan shall haw a least dimension of 20 Inches. 202 RIP -RAP A Stone for rip -rap Moll be approved, rough, unbesn quarry stone, as nearly rectangular In section as practicable The stone Mall be hard, sound and modstant to the action of water and weathering. They Mall be of a rock type other then serpentine rock containing the fibres variety chryee 1, (asbestos) and suitable it, ewry respect far the purpose Intmdad Heavy Type: The individual slices shalt haw a depth equal to the thick.... of the course of rip-rp. At last 75 Percent of the volume of the rip -rap, complete In piece, shall condst of stones that haw a molrnum Volume of 16 cubic feet Light Type: The Individual stmes shall have a depth equal to the thickness of the tours. of rip-rp. The rip-rp, complete In place, shall consist of stanes that have a minimum volume of 1/2 cubic foot. 2.03 GE07EXTILE FABRIC A. Gootextne fabric shell awforn to the requirements of Section 02210 - Site E-mwwk. PART 3 - EIECUMON 3.01 PREPARATION A. The areas to be protected shall be constructed and graded to the lines indicated on the plans w - directed by the Engineer and. if a fill wea, shall be compacted. All slopes shall be maintained to the neat lines Indicated on the plans prior to the placing of gootexhle fabric or bedding material, stone fill, rip -rap w slope povng. 3.02 PLACING STONE FILL A. The specified atone fill shall be placed in one course thickness as shown on the plane in omanner that will result In a reasonably well graded surf... Care shall be taken In the placing to avoid displacing of the underlying material. B. The stonesad! be a placed and distributed that them still be no see m.l.tfons of either the larger or smaller .I- of at.. C. Rearrangement of the stone fill by hand labor - machonical equipment may be required to obtain the specified results. D. When stone fill and geotext➢e fabric are to be placed as part of an embankment, the protective materials shall be placed cancumently with the construction of the embankment unless otherwise authwfzed by the Engineer E. when stone fill and geotext➢e fabric is to be paced unde, water, methods Malt be used that will minkal- segregation and fsure that the required thickness of protective material will be obtained. SECTION 005113 - BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAW4 PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A Section inoludeu 1. Base Courses 2. Leveling Courses 3. Finish Course B. General: This sort, shall consist of one or more courses of bituminous mixturs constructed an a prepared foundatlon in accordance with these Spedflalions and the type of surface being placed, and In conformity with the lines, grades thicknesses and typical cross sections shown an the plane or established by the Englne-. 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Use adequate number of skilled Barkers who we thoroughly trained and experienced in the necessary wafts and who we completely familiar with the speclfed requirements and the methods needed for proper performance of the work of this Section. B. NI materials and Installation shall be In accordmce with The Asphalt Institut. Manus (MS-4) and the VAOT Standard Specifications, 1990. C. Mixing Plant: Conform to State of Vermont Standards. D. Obtain matwials from same source throughout. 1.03 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Bituminous can ete shall not be placed between November 1 and May 1. Material shall not be placed when the granular subbase I. wet or whon the air temperature at the paving wit. In the had. and away from artificial heal I. as fellows. Air Temperature Pavement Degrees Fahrenheit Compacted Depth 40 Degrees or below Greater than 1 1/4" 50 Degrees or below Lees than 1 1/4 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A Materials shall be combined and graded to most the criteria as for Tyae11 (bosed In e.-me) and Type pIll VAStandard c(f lair c-new) an 700 bite rinou t emanate. B. Gradation: Materials shall be combined and graded to meet composition limit. specified In VAOT Standard Specification, Section 406.03. far the base course and finish counts. C. Thickness of paving for drive. and Parking lots shall be as, Mown on the plan; consisting of base course and finish course. D. For pavement reconstruction orea. due to trenching, the depth of min cares hall Mall be Increased by 1/2". Pavement -ittructi- -used by trench reopening due to improper placement or non -approved placement shall be performed at no additional cost to the Owner. 2.02 TRAFFIC MARKINGS A. Traffic marking point to be factory-mhked, meeting the requirements of the VAOT Standard Specifications, Section 706.06. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION A. Install In ocaardance with VAOT Standard Specifications, Section 406. 3.02 EXAMINATION A. Verify Dose candibons uncle the provisions of Section 02210 - Site Earthwork. B. Verify that-mpacted granular base is dry and ready to support paving and Imposed loads. C. Verify gradients and elevation. of Dose are -.L &03 PREPARATION A. Matching Surfaces When a new pavement is to match an existing bituminous pavement for a roadway w trench, the Cmtratw shall vertically smooth rut the existing pawmmt. over the existing gravel base. The smooth art Mall be thoroughly cleaned and wated with Emulsified Asphalt, RS-1, Just prier to paving. 3.04 PREPARATION - TACK COAT A. when the bottom course of bituminous concrete povemert is left over the winter, or paving Is to be made over an existing bituminous concrete pavement, the existing surface shall be denied and Emulsified Asphalt applied before the next a-- Is applied. B. Also apply to contact surfaces of curbs. C. Coat surfaces of manhole and catch basin frames with oil to prevent bond with asphalt pavement Do not took -at these _rocs; 3.05 PLACING ASPHALT PAVEMENT A Place to compacted thickness identified on the plan,. B. Compact pavement by telling. Do not displace or extrude pavement from position. Hand compact in areas inaccessible to rolling equipment. C. Develop rolling with consecutive posses to achieve even and smooth finish, wlthoutrollor mark; 3.06 JOINTS A. Joints between aid and new pavements or between encw,aiw days work shall be made so as to Insure a thor-ghmd anUnuous bend between the dal and n mI.W- whenever the spreading process I. Interrupted long enough far the mixture to attain Its initial stability, the pave shall be removed from the mat and a Joint constructed. B. Butt joint. Mall be formed by cutting the pavement in a Vertical plane at right glee to the centerline where the prwmat hoe a true surf-s as determined by the us of a stroight-edge. The butt joint Mall be thoroughly coated with Emulsified Asphalt, Type RS-1, Just prior to depositing the paving mixtures C. Longitudinal Joints that haw became cad shall be coated with Emulsified Asphalt, Type RS-I. before the adjacent at M placed. If they haw been eposed to traffic, they shall be at back to o clean vertical edge prior to painting with the enulslon. D. Unless otherwise drected. Imgitudinol joints Man be offset at least 6" from my joint In the lower courses of pavement. Transverse Joint. shall not be constructed nearer than one foot from the traneverse joints constructed In I.- .-moo. 3.07 TOLERANCES A The surface will be tested by the Engineer using a 16 foot straight -edge at "acted location, parallel with the contarline. Any Variations exceeding 3/16 of an Inch between any two contacts Mall be-U.11,dwily eliminated. A 10 fat straight-edg. may be used on a vertical curve. The straight -edges Moll be provided by the Contrector. B. Scheduled Compacted Thickness Within 1/4 Inch. C. Variation from True Elevation: Within 1/2 Inch. 3.08 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Perm li no whiplar troffc on surfaces until thoroughly coal antl hand. 3,09 REPAIR OF SUBSIDENCE A Settlement - Should any pavement settle within one year of completion of the Contract, pch pavement Mall be repaired at the Contractor'a e,pmm If the Contract,, fag, to make such repalre promptly upan receipt of notice to do so from the Owner, then the Own- may make such repcim a, necessary and the Contractor Malt pay the Own- far all costs incurred In making such mpolre. 3.10 MARKING PAVEMENT FOR PARKING A. Striping - Thoroughly clean the areas to receive striping a d locate all striping a Indicated on the Contract Plans NI striping shall be 4" old. unless otherwise noted. S. Miscellaneous - Provide handicapped symbols and oil other miscellaneous signs and symbols as Indicated an the Contract Plans. SECTION 02515 - CURBS AND WALKS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Sec Um includes 1. Concrete Curbs 2. Concrete Sidewalks PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 CONCRETE A The concrete Malt haw a minimum compressive strength of 4,0DO pal at 28 day and Mall amform to the requirements of Cast -In -Plan Concrete. 202 ADMIXTURES A Air-ertrolning admixture shall meet or exceed ASTM C260. Air content shall range from mbinnum of 5% to 7% maximum. 203 EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL A. Em zp-slan joint material shall be preolded bituminous filler oonf-Ing to ASTM D994. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 CONCRETE CURBS A Excavation shall be made to the required depth and the base material uponwhich true curb Is to De es[ Mall De cwnpocted to a firm, even surface. NI aft and unsuitable material .hag be removed antl replaced with -[table material which shall be thoroughly c-npactW. B. Installation: The curb shall be set so that the Want top line fa In close conformity to the line and grade required. M space under the curbing shall be filled and thoroughly tamped with material mooting the requhm emte of the material for the beef .puree. C. Concrete Mixing and Placing: Compaction of c-crate placed In the forme Mall be by spading - other approved methods Forms Mall be left In plan f- 24 hours - until the concrete has set sufficfan0y so that they can be removed without Injury to the curbing. Upon removal of the forms, the cum Mall be Immediately rubbed down to a smooth and uniform -,face but no plastering will be permitted Far this work, competent and skillful finishers shall be employed. D. Sections: Curbing shall be constructed In sections having a uniform length of ter fat, unless otherwise ordered. Sections shall be separated by pm joints 1/8 Inch wide except at . pmsian joints. E. Eparsion Joints Expansion pints shall be formed at the Intervals shown on the plan. using a pre -formed expansion joint filer having a thickness of 1/4 Inch at to conform to the woes -section of the curb. They Mal be constructed at 20 foot Intervals or as directed by the Engineer. When the curb is, constructed adjacent to w on coil pavement, expansion joints Mall be located opposite - at expansion joint, in the p.--L SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCMATES, INC. P.O. BOX485 SHELBURIE, VT 114462 Sal 232y FAX 89ABSNTr1 ewb: wwwase0con nlu.N PJM ceacsso SAV APP.OyN SAY PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT Deis I c®CI® fulmok 2/5/Ml SAV I FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONS Mrs aMwrNG NU1a.R NOV., 2005 , AS SHOWN C3.1 -. Na. 02250 F. Bcekfilung: After the concrete has set Sufficiently, the spaceedi front elevationnd back with layersof t e curb f not more ( be than filled to a Inches of the Sane material as the bedding antl thoroughly tamped. G. The Contractor shall protect the curb and keep It In alignment until the completion of the contract. Each curb which Is damaged at any time previous to find acceptance of the work Mall be removed and replaced with satisfactory curb at the C-tracta'S expense. 3.02 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS A Excavation and Foundation: Excavation shall be made to the required depth and to a width that will permit placing of bed course material and the Installation and bracing of the forms. Bed course materld shall be placed to the depth and section Shown an the plans. When the layer required exceeds six Inches, two layers of approximately equal depth hall be placed and each layer thoroughly compacted So that It Is hard and unyielding. The wetting of bed course material may be required to obtain the comp -tier. B. Finishing The surface shall be finished with a wooden fleet. No pleslarinq will be permitted. Th. edges shall Oa founded with an edger having a radius of 1/4 Inch. The Surface of the Sldesel after the floating and -.ad., praceas is completed, shall be fintehed with a broom of o type approved by the Engineer, drawn over the sud .. parallel to the transverse joints. Special texturing on sidewalk ramp. Mall be installed In .-wdance with construction plan details. C. Joints: Unless others'.. Indicated an the plan. or directed by the Engineer, expansion joints MNI be placed awry 20 feet. Expansion joints Mall be formed around all appurtenances Such as manholes, utility poles and other ch.tructlon. tending Into and through the sidewalk. Pre -formed joint filler 1/4 Inch thick shall be Installed h these joints. Expansion joint filler of the thkkness Indicated Mall be Instilled between "'caste e'dewalk. and any fixed sbuctore Such a a building or bridge. This exponsiar joint material Mail extend for the full depth of the walk. Gists- the -panWn ].Into, the sidewalk shall be divided atlrte�Z of 5 feet by dummy joints formed by a Jointing tool or other acceptable means ad, directed to provide grooves approximately 1/8 Inch wide and at least 1/3 of the depth. When the Sidewalk Id, cmatmcted next to a concrete expan- sion, joint materiel Mall be placed between sidewalk and curb for the depth of the sidewalk. 0. Curing: During the curing period all traffic, both pedestrian and vehicular. Mall be excluded. Vehicular traffic Mall be excluded far such additional time as the Engineer may direct. E. Sockflling. Before the concrete has been opened to traffic, the space on each aide of the sdewalk Mall be b-kflled to the required I.-tlon with suitable material, firmly compacted and neatly graded. SECTION 02700 - WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM PART i - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Pipe Materials 2. Hydrant. 3. Vdves 4. Flltings 5. All other appurtenances necessary to complete the water main system as Mown on the Contract Plane. 1.02 SUBMITTALS A Product Data: Submit published data from manufacturers of products and acceseorles specified. Indlcating compliance with requirements to the Engineer and local municipality. 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. All materials and the installation procedure Shell be In accordance with the Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Supply Division and the applicable construction ordinances of the local municipality. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 GENERAL A FmnIM ells, tees, reducing tees, wyes, coupling, Inare.er,, "77 Inansit,we and and cap. of the same type and does .1 material a the conduit, or of material having equal or Superior physical and chemical properties as all eptaWe to the Engineer as necessary to complete the vote system. 2.02 DUCTILE IRON WATER PIPE A Pipe Mall be Tyton Ductile ban Class 52 (sizes as shown an the plans) conforming to current ANSI/AWWA C151/A21.51 latent Match. Push -on joint pipe shall be minimum thickness Class 52. Pain -on joint accessories Mall conform to applicable requirements of ANSI/AWWA C111/A21.11. B. Pipe shall be cement mortar lined an the Inside In o.D-d.nce with ANSI Specification A21.4 except that the ement lining thickness Mall not be Isss than 1/8 Inch. A Plus tderance of 1/8 inch call be peritted. C. Pipe shall be given on Interior bituminous coating in accordance, with ANSI Specification A21.4 and an exterlor bitminoue coating of cod, tor or asphalt base In accordance with ANSI Specification A21.S1. 2.03 FiTTMCS A. Duetke ion fittings Mail mnfor to ANSI Specification A21.10. 350 PSI working pressure. Cast Iran Class 250 pipe fittings Mall be allowed in fieu of ductile Wan fittings Class 350. Drctle Wan compact fittings copfoming to AWWA C153-88 will be allowed in Ilea of full body fittings. S. All M.J. fittings Shall haw mega -lug glands for additional joint restraint. C Belts shell conform to ANSI Specification A21.10. 2.04 TAPPING SLEEVES Contact Champlain Water District prior to Scheduling a at top at tranornostm main. A Tapping deews Mall be of the split sleeve design, constructed with two Said half-deeves belted together. Sleeves Mail be full -wrap and full gasket standess steel, Mall haw a waking pressure of at least 200 psi, and Mal w l have mechanical joint -do with and and eider gasket seals. B. All Iron body topping skews Shan be provided with a 3/4" NPT test plug, or other provisions must be made for air testing the valve and sieve at maximum working pressure, prior to tapping. C. All bolts and nuts for m-hankd joints of tapping I. - shall be of high -strength cast Iron orhigh-strength, tow - alloy Steel conforming to ANSI/AWWA 0111 /A21.11-90. D. All bolts and nuts for flanged joints of topping sleeves shall be of AISC Type 304 stainless steel. E. All bolts and nuts shall be sound, decry and coated with a rust-mslstmt lubricant; their Surfaces shall be free of objectionable protrusions that would into fe with their fit In the made-up mechanical , flanged 'pint. F. All bats and nuts used with all pipe sleeves Shell, upon final tightening and testing, be bash coated heavily with bltumaatle cold -applied motwlol to thoroughly cover all exposed Surfaces of the bolts and nuts. 2.05 TAPPING VALVES A. Tapping vows shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C509-87 Standard for Resllent-Seated Gate Valves for Water and Sewage System., except as modified heron. Valve shall open counterclockwise and Mall haw a minimum working pressure of 200 pin. inlet flanges Mali be Class 425 conforming to ANSI Specification 816.1 or ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10. ond -list connection Mall be Standardized Mechanical Joint unless specified otherwise on the Contract Pima for the type of pipe required far the branch w lateral ppeline. B. Buried topping valves Mail be provided with a 2 Inch square tench nut and Mall be Installed with a coat Iron valve box as required to allow positive access to the wow operating nut at all times In hatdl&l .. where the depth hem grads to tap of valve operating nut Is greater than 80', a calve stem riser Mall be provided and installed such that the depm th from valve steriser nut to grade Is from 4'0' to 6V (minimum length of -Ica atom doer is 2'0'). Vdw at- river Mail be of high strength steel and of welded con.Wction. 2.06 GATE VALVES A. Valves Mail be manufactured to meet all requirement, of AWWA Specification C509-87. Vdves 12 inch.. and Smaller Mall be bubble tight, zero leakage at 200 psi working pressure. Vows Mall haw non-riaing stems, open counterclockwise, and be provided with a 2 Inch square operating nut with arrow cast In metal to Indicate direction of opening. Each wlw Shdl how maker's name, pressure rating and year in which m nufaetured cast on the body. Prior to shipment from the factory, each valve Mall be tested by hydrostatic pressure equal to twice the specified working Pressure. Gate wives Mall be Mueller. Drees. or Kennedy. B. Buried wives Mall be Installed with a valve box. 207 VALVE BOX A. Cast Won New England style elide -type. 5 1/4 inch shaft, 8 fact trench depth. B. Cover Moll be cast Wan, marked "WATER' and Indloating direction of opening. 2,08 HYDRANTS A. Mueller or Kennedy M/JI Shoe N 5 1/4 A, 24015 I.M.P. with 6 foot minimum bury and National Standard thread. The hydrant. Mall haw at least 12 Inch.. between the bettarn of the steamer cap and the ground. The Contractor Mall w ify the hydrant requirements with the local water department end fire department. 2.09 SERVICE CONNECTIONS A. Service Imes Mall be installed we as to run perpentlimlar, in a straight line from the water main to the curb .top. copp B. Each -Al. MNI .-.let of a corpora curb stainless sqeteel tor erNce tubing and a curb box with a oast Y rod. SeMce lines from three-quarter to two Inch (3/4' to 2') shall beCacopper tubing from the aer'pKaration atop to ffhea cum to�ASTM BBB. tubing name hall wet adenafk of Naa m,=fbctconirernlanpder type Mta Ppshell beshd beed at one p"I1ar front tea arporg the .- taro the cuprb .top. The minlmum Id, for .single-family reMmce .It be three-quartor Inch (v3/4'). The minimum service for a duplex Mall be one inch (I ). C. Corporations Man be Waterworks Brain and manufactured In accordance with AWWA C80D Corporations Mall have Mueller threads, adopted as AWWA Figure 1, at the Inlet and a compression type fitting at the outlet. Both Inlet and outlet shall be the some she. Three-quarter Inch and we -Inch corporations Mall be directly tapped into ductile Won pipe .ix inches (6) and forger In diameter. Larger size corporation. up to two Inches (2') Mall use a tapping saddle. Ppe less than six Inches (6") CMalt require the use of a topping saddle and corporation. orporation Mall be used for all tape up to two Inches (2'). In no Instance, except when a tapping sleeve and wave are used. Mall atop be made without a corporation. Corporations Mall be Mueller H-15WS (3/4" - I'), or Mueller H 15D13 (1 1/2' - 2'). A connection made to a pipe that requires a tapping saddle or Is not ductile Yon will haw a body with a suitable outlet, led, and suitable mama for attachment to the main. The body shall be made to confarn to the outside configuration of the m. The Service .Seale Mall be designed to provide a drip tight a connection. The body Mall be Teflon or Epoxy coated with stainless steel strap(.), bolts, nut.. and mechanism far attaching to the pipe barrel. D. Curb stops Mall be a quarter ton plug type -I- with o-ring tyye aeal antl manufactured of Waterworks Brass In accordance with AWWA C800. The curb atop Moll open IS' haw a po.ttiw stop, and be of the tee design a bat design. No curb atop ShNI haw the mareY to drain the service line. Both the Inlet and m0et of The curb atop Man haw compresvim type fittinga. Thor tea head of the cum atop Shan haw the provision for the ...fi_ of a service rod. Curb atapa Man be ., B 25209. The curb stop Mall reat an 'four inch by eight Inch by sixteen -Inch (4' x 8" z n ') Ste block far support Curb stops Mall be Installed )net Inside the municipal R O.W. E. Curb boxes shall be of Sliding ads table type capable of adjusting from five test to six fast (5' - W). The base of the box Mail be arm type so cro to prevent the box from resting - the curb atop. The atl).stable upper section Mall be one Inch (I') diameter fa use with 3/4" and I' verb stops. Fa erg- curbstops, the rY ,add. f8xed Lo the keer y of he curb ? Mall be top with a baae ins Mall be thirty Inches (30') in a ngth for 3/4' and 1' curb stops and twatYY--four inches (24') far long. curb atop.. Curb box rod. Mall be stainless steel. The cover of the boz shell haw the word 'WATER" herbed an the top. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION PROCEDURES A. Installation of all water tines Mail be In -.-dance with AWWA C 600 latest revision. B. All pipe and fittings shall be Inspected and tested In accordance with the m... facWrele apecltations and the aforementlaned AWWA Speill atian.. The Contractor Shall fumiM for approval ."'fi atxn from the pipe manufacturer that all tests how been performed with satisfactory results. Pipe shall not be Installed without the Englneees approval. C. Pipe, fittng% and-cessories shell be casfully handled to ava'd damage. Prior to the date of acceptance of the project wain by he Owner, the Contactor shall replace any new pipe or a.essqry found to be defective at any time. Including after in.tdiation, at no .We. to the Owner. D. All pipe Mowing cracks shell be rejected. If crocks occur In the pipe, the Contractor may, at his own expense and with the --d of the Engineer, cut oft the cracked partfare of a point at least 12' tram the visible limit. of the crack and use the Sound portion of the pipe. E. All pipe and fittings shot be Neared of all foreign matter and debri. prior to hstallatian and shall be kept clew until the time of acceptance by the Owner. E The pipe shell be laid to conform to the It.- and grades Indicated an the drawings w given by the Engineer. Each pipe shell be So laid as to farm a doe. joint with he next adjoining pipe and to bring the inverts continuously to the required grace- G. At all times, when the pipe laying is not actually in program, the open ends of the pipe Mall be closed by temporary watertight pluga err by other approved s n . If .at Is In the tranch wean work to resumed, the plugMali not be removed until all danger of water entering the pipe has paaeed. The pipe Me" be Installed In trenches and of the line and grade Mown an he Contract Plans. Any deflection joints Mall be within the limits apeaffied by the manufa t. -. H. All piping and appurtenances connected to the equipment Mall be supported so that no strain will be Imposed on the equipment. 11 the squOmant manull at..". ep-Ifka j... Induce that piping loads are not to be transferred, the Contractor shall Submit certification of camplim- L Far pressure piping, concrete thrust blocks Mall be Installed at all unrestrained Flttings and other locations as indicated an the Contract Plana Minimum bearing or.. Mall be a. Mown on the Contract Pima. Concrete Mall be Z500 psi. Concrete Meg be placed against undisturbed material and shall not adver pint% belt. or nut., or Interior. with the removal of any pint. Wooden side fore Mall be provided for thru.t blocks. J. Conductivity bands ar wedges Mall be Installed at awry pipe )Dint Verify requirements with the City of South Burlington. Water Daparbn-L K. A minimum Separation of 18' vertical and 10' horizontal shelf be maintained between the outside of all water and sewer Mae unless a variance Is granted by the Water Supply Division. L. The shall be no physical connection between the distribution system and my pipes, pump, hydrants, or tanks whim are supplied or may be Supplied with a water that is. or may be contaminated. M. The Contractor Mail take all necessary precautions to prevent flotation of the pipe in the trench. N. All trenching Safety Standards man be In conformance with all applicable State and Federal guidelines. The Contract, Mall be eddy responsible for my Safety citations by Slate or Federal inspectors. 3,02 SETTING OF VALVES AND FITTINGS A. vdwa, fitting, plugs. and cape man be Set and )ined to pipe in the manner specified above far laying and joining pipe. B. Valve boxes are to be Installed - all burled valves. The boxes shalt be cast Won with a minimum 5 1/4' diameter and long enough to extend from the valor to wished grade. The boxes shill end-e the operating nut and stuffing box of the valves. Valve boxes Mall not transfer loads onto the vdve. C. Covers Mall be dose tinting and dirt tight with he tap of the ever flush with the top of the box rim. Covers shell be marked "WATER" with an arrow Indicating the direction of opening. 3.03 SETTING OF HYDRANTS A. Hydrant. Mail be located as shown or .. directed cro oa to provide .-plot. aaswsiblity and minimize the possibility of damage from vehicles or In)jry to pedeStrlms. B. When placed behind the mrb, the hydrant barrel Mall be Set So that no portion of the pumper or hose nozzle cap will be less than 6 Inches nor more than 12 Inches from the gutter face of the curb. C. When set in the lawn space between the curb and the Sidewalk. or between the sidewalk and the property line, no portion of the hydrant or nozzle cap Mall be within 6 Inches of the sidewalk. D. All hydrants Mall stand plumb and Mall have their nozzles pardlel with, or ot right angles to, the curb, with the pump- nozzle facing the curb, except that hydrants having two hose nozdes 90 degrees apart shall be set with each norde facing the curb at an angle of 45 degrees. Hydrant. shall be set to the established grade, with nozzles at least 12 Inches above the ground, as Mown or as directed by the Engineer. E Each hydrant shot he connected to the met. with a 6 inch cast iron branch controlled by on Independent six Inch gate vdw, unless otherwise Specified. F. The waste opening of all hydrants call be securely plugged. 3.04 DISINFECTION A. DW.f-tl n of the pipeline Mali be directed by the Engineer d -St. for all water, material., equipment and I to Perfarra tha required testing Mall be t the Contractor's expense. AWWA Standard C-651 (latest revision) Shoo be use as a bests for the disinfection process. All disinfection/ testing shill be completed by an Independent third party unkes otherwise approved by the Engineer or local municipality. B. The Engineer ll require as minimum: 1. Complete flushing of the pipeline to waM out all dirt. debris, eta wh ch may haw accumulated in the pipeline during constructian. 2. Following flushing (to dean dew water), the Contractor will add chlorine to the entire pipeline volume of Stator such that the water will have not less than 25 mg/L free chlorine, and let the mixture at for at least 24 haute 3. After the 24 hour duration, the water In the pipeline shall be tasted for residual free chlorine and must contain a minimum of 10 mg/L chlorine. If less than 10 mg/L are found, than the diamfectim procedure shell be repeated cent" of least 10 mg/L chlorine residual Is indicated by [eat. 4. Upon successful completion of the at" above, the pipeline shell be flushed agate until the chlorine c trotlon In the pipeline is no higher than that prewAing In the supply system. After this final flushing and before the pipeline Is placed in service, bacteriological sample. shall be collected on two conse.utlw days, and Submitted to the Vermont Health Department for analysis. If the Initial disinfection falls to produce sampled, which pass the Vermont State Health Deportment requirements fa potable drinking water. than the pr-ees anal) be repeated until satisfactory results are obtdnea Upon Satisfactory results by the Vermont State Health Deportment the pipeline may be placed in SeMce. 3.05 PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TESTS A The Contractor shall furnish all gauges, testing plugs caps and ell other n-wy equipment and labor to perform leakage and pressure tests In sectors of an approved length. Each vdwd Section err a maximum length of 1,000 feet of pipe Mail be tested. The Contractor Shell provide of his own expense any adidtland tape to the water It.. swy to perform the pressor. and leakage test between valves NI d'uinfactian/tearing Mail be completed by an Independent third party unless otherwise approwd by the Engineer or local municipality. B. NI water required fa toasting Mall be potable. All testing Mall be conducted in the presence of the Engineer. C. The Contractor Mall make the necessary provision, to tap the plpe at the high point to release ell air and shall plug awns ofter completing the test Hydrant, or blowoffs located at high points may be used far air release in Ileu of tape if approved by the Engineer. D. For the pressure test, the Contractor Mall develop and maintain far two hours 150% of the working pressure or 200 psi, whichever is greater. Failure to held within 5 psi of the designated pressure far the two-hour period constitutes a fallur. of the section tested. E No pipe Installation Mail be accepted If the leakage i, greater then that determined by the following formula: L= 7.400 Whichever 1. lee. L S Length of Pipe Testing L = Allowable Leakage in Gal/Hr D = Nominal Diameter of Pipe P = A -Mg. Test Pressure (pal ) N = Number of Joints in the Pipeline Tested All testing Mall be conducted In accordance with AWWA C600 (latest reWalm)_ F. Should my Section of pipe fah either the pressure or leakage test, the Contractor Mail do everything necessary to locate and repair or replace the defective pipe, fitting& ar joint, at no mat to the Owner. SECTION 02725 - DRAINAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Drainage pipe and appurtmanceo. 2. Drainage structures. B. Related Sections 1. Section 02225 - Utility Trenching and Backfilling 1.02 SUBMITTALS A. Manufacturer's technical data for. 1. Ppe and appurtenances. 2 Structures. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Furnish ells, tees, reducing tees, wym couplings, Increasers, crosa s. transitions and and cape of the came type and does of material as the conduit, or of material having equal w aupedor physical and chemical properties as acceptable to the Engineer. 2.02 DRAINAGE PIPE AND PERFORATED PIPE A If the Contract Pima do not specify a particular type of plp, at the Contactors option, the following materials may be used: 1. Polyvinyl Chloride pipe conforming to ASTM Specification 03034 w F679, `PVC) sewer pipe and fittings SIDE 35. 2. Corrugated Polyethylene pipe and fittings (Smooth interior) meatbrg the requirements of AASHTO M-204 and M-252. 2.03 CONCRETE STRUCTURES A. ASTM C478, sized as indicated. 2.04 METAL ACCESSORIES A. Manhole frames and covear 1. Cray cast Iron, ASTM A48, as Mown on plans. PART 3 - EXECUIID! 3.01 INSPECTION A. Examine the we- and conditions under which Storm sewer system work Is to be Installed and notify the Engineer In writing of conditions detrimental to the proper and timely completion of the cork. Do not proceed with the work antl unsatisfactory conditon. have bean corrected. 3.02 GENERAL A. When existing underground utilities. which we not Scheduled far removal or abandonment. we ancesuntered In the excavation, they Mall be adequately Supported and protected from damage. Any damage to utilities Mail be repoked promptly at no additional cost to the Owner. 3.03 PREPARATION A. Hand tren excavation (where necessary) to required elevations. Correct over-excawtlons with fill material. B. The slopes shall be graded to match the grade as Mown - the pions Where required, end sections shall be placed and ba.kfllled to prevent undermining. C. Remove large stones or other hard matter which could damage drainage structures or Impacts consistent backilling or completion. 3.04 INSTALLATION OF PIPE A. Pipe shell be Installed in accordance with Section 02225 - Utility Trenching and Backfilling. 3.05 INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES A. Precast .--to structures: 1. Place precast concrete structures and coves as shown on the Contract Pima. 2. Where menhdes occur in pavement, set tops of frames and vent fluid with finish ... f.oe. 3. Provide rubber joint gasket .-Plying with ASTM C443. 3.06 INSTALLATION OF STONE FILL A. Place etas fill ore shown on Contract Plans SECTION 02730 - SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS PART 1 - GENERAL. 1.01 SUMMARY A. Section includes: 1. Gravity Sorer Pip. 2. Manhole Structures and Appurtenances B. Related Sectons I. Sectim 02225 - Utility Trenching and Sackfllling 1.02 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Submlt published data from manufacturers of products and accessories specified, Indicating compliance with requirement.. 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Ali sanitary sewer material, and construction of some Mall be as shown an the Contract Pions and shell meet the requirements of the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (Department of Environmental Coaserwtlm) and the Public Woks Standards and Specif ootiona of the local munic'pdity. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 GENERAL A. Furnish d1, tees, reducing tees, wyes. couplings, Inarea- crosses, transition. and and caps of the same type and dace of malerial as the conduit, or of material having equal or superior physical and chemical properties as acceptable to the Engineer to praNde a complete and operable system. 2.02 PVC GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER PIPE A. PVC sewer pipe Mall cantor In all respect. to the latest revision of ASTM Sp Nfieatlon, 0-3034 or F679, Type PSM PNyAnyt Chloride (PVC) Sewer Pipe and Fittings. SDR 35 pp, An pipe and fitting. Mall be dearly marked as fallow - Manufacturer' Name and Trademark Nominal Pipe Size (ad, Mown an plans) - Materiel Da.ignatian 12454-C PVC - Legend "Type PSM SDR 35 PVC Sewer Pipe or 'PS 46 PVC Sewer Pipe Designation ASTM D-3034 or F879 B. Joints Mall be push -on type using elastomaric gasketa and Mall conform to ASTM D-3212. The gaskets shall be factory Installed. The pipe Mall be fumlehed in nominal 13 foot imgths. Sufficient numbers of Mort lengths and full machine FlttIngs shall be provided for use at mmhdes and connection.. All connecHana will rsquire the use of mufact... d fittings. Field fabricated. saddle -type connection, will not be considered acceptable. 2.04 MANHOLES A. Manholes Shalt be sized ad, indicated an the plan and Moll be precast concrete with a monolithic base and Mall confer to the latest canon of ASTM Specification C478. B. Shelves Shall be constructed with concrete having a minimum compresal" strength of 3,000 psi at 28 days. Inverts for anholas Shell be as Mown on the plane and estate and Mall be constructed with to - brick, par the load municipality's standards, Inverts Mall haw the meet shape of the ewer to which they are connected, and any change In Size of direction Shop be gradud and even. C. All manholes are to be provided with copolymer Pat nopylane plastic steps with steel reinforcement 12 Inches on center. D. All manholes Mall be provided with rough. gray, cast Iran manhole frames and covers. All iron writings Shall be thoroughly Cleaned and than mated with hot tor before being dellwred. Frames and a.- hall be L.Swen LC 266, or an approved equal, and haw a minimum weight of 400 pounds. E. Precast riser' and bases for manholes shall conform to ASTM Specification C-478. The pipe opening In the precast manhde system Shall haw a cast -In -place flexible gasket , an cWhedent System far pipe Installation as approved by the Engineer. Joints between manhde ri-a Mail be 1 minimum width flexible gasket ar approved equal, PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 GENERAL A Care Mall be exercised by the Contractor to avoid disrupting the operation of existing smNary sewer facBltles without prior written approval of the Engineer. B. When existing underground utilities not scheduled for removal or abandonment are encountered in the excavation, they Mail be adequately Supported and protected from damage. Any damage to utilities Mall be repaired Promptly at no additional cast to the Owner. C. Insta111o0m of pipe Mall be do ...,dance with Section 02225 - Utility Trenching and Backfilling and as specified by this -.it-. 3.02 BEDDING FOR PIPE A. The bedding material shall be shaped to fit the pipe for a depth of not less than 10 percent of its total height and Mall have recesses to -elve the bell. SITE ENGINEER: r aft ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC, P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 BR 86emf FAX 96248542n wab wuw.ao-vl.xa Do," PJM SAV SAV ad PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT IlePs CR® B61ID[tlr 2/5/05 SAV 1 FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONS BAPS aiAwalG nll®Ht NOV., 2005 A9 C3.2 AS SHOWN PBW. Na. 02250 SEE NOTE 3 PLAN REFERENCES: A. "PLAT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY - PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE OF ILA M. [SHAM' PREPARED BY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., LAST REVISED JUNE 30, 1999. B. "PLAN OF LAND OF HARRY B. and BERNICE N. CONKLIN" PREPARED BY J.M. SINCLAIR, DATED JULY 1943. C. "FINAL PLAT FOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY OF GERALD MILOT AND JOHN LARKIN" - PINNACLE O SPEAR (FORMERLY NOWLAND TWO), PREPARED BY BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED 8/21/1998. D. "PLAT SHOWING SURVEY AND SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LANDS OF PINNACLE ® SPEAR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION', PREPARED BY LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED & BUTTON ASSOCIATES, DATED 3/31/1999. E. 'SWIFT ESTATES" PREPARED BY WILLIS ENGINEERING, DATED 9/21/1971. F. "LANDS OF ROBERT AND MARJORIE SKIFF - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION PLAY, PREPARED BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., DATED 4/21/2002. NOTES: 1. PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO DEPICT THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF LANDS OF GARY N. FARRELL, OF KAREN, KEVIN & BRENT FARRELL AND BRENDA COLE, AND OF GARY N. & JANE FARRELL AT NUMBERS 1302, 1340, AND 1640 SPEAR STREET, RESPECTIVELY. OTHER PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY, ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY, AND ARE NOT COVERED BY THE CERTIFICATION BELOW. 2. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITH A TOTAL STATION AND A STEEL TAPE BETWEEN FALL 2003 AND WINTER 2004-5. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE REFERENCED TO ASTRONOMIC NORTH BASED ON SOLAR OBSERVATIONS MADE IN SEPTEMBER, 1995. SEE PLAN REFERENCE 1. 4. THE DEED DESCRIPTIONS DESCRIBING THE LOCATIONS OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND SURVEYED AND THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE LOCATED ON THE GROUND WERE COMPARED TO PROVIDE BOUNDARY LOCATIONS THAT ARE MOST REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE DEEDS AND CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING MONUMENTATION. WHERE CONFLICTS BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND WRITTEN EVIDENCE ARE SUBSTANTIAL, DEEDS AND/OR PLANS SHOULD BE OR WILL BE EXECUTED TO ELIMINATE ANY CONFLICT OR COLOR OF TITLE. 5. SPEAR STREET HAS A RECORD 66 FOOT WADE RIGHT OF WAY. LOCATION HERE DETERMINED BY EXISTING MONUMENTATION AND THE TRAVELED POR11ON OF THE ROAD. REFERENCE TOWN OF BURLINGTON HIGHWAYS AND ROADS 1802-1865, PAGE 22 AND TOWN OF SHELBURNE TOWN MINUTES VOLUME 1, PAGE 229. 6. MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE, SANITARY SEWER, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE AT THE LOT LINES OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS FROM POINTS OF ORIGIN THROUGH PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY OR RECORDED EASEMENTS. 7. NOT BEING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY, CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. HAS UNDERTAKEN NO INVESTIGATION WHATSOEVER MATH RESPECT TO WHETHER THE PROPERTY AND EACH COMPONENT THEREOF IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL OR STATE PERMITS. 8. THIS PROPERTY LIES IN THE 'SOUTHEAST QUADRANT" AND 'DORSET PARK SCENIC PROTECTION - ZONE D' ZONING DISTRICTS. 9. A 60' WIDE "EASEMENT" AND A 20' WIDE "RECREATIONAL EASEMENT', BETWEEN VALE DRIVE AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, ARE DEPICTED ON REFERENCE PLAN D, AND REVISED (AS SHOWN HEREON) ON REFERENCE PLAN C. THE EARLIER ALIGNMENT IS REFERENCED IN AN 'IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION" TO THE CITY DATED NOV. 15, 1995 AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 428 AT PAGE 732. "SWIFT ESTATES" SUBDIVISION P.B. Grabowski I M. & M. Scollirls I T. and L. Mail I C. Shand et al & J. L. Milot volume 175, Page 163 Volume 405, Page 726 tio. Volume 643, Page 297 I Volume 175, Page 523 20' Recreational Not Easement J/f" AG y 8•E 50531'35•E See Note t.2e' AG - - - - -�_�454.43'�- • F 317.02• 3/a" rFF 1" � 359.08' 268.55 n" AtF xa ac - /- - Open Space 2s• AO 1 S � ear' / ` •Plnnecle ® Sp Karen, aeaCoFarel! I )Vq� and Kevin, 0,91V wt Volume 274 Pages 440- 4 1 Lar volume 296, 53Partnership ° E Volume 274 Pages 280-282 DE UVM and State Agricultural College?I $ h 384 - \ Volume 134, Page V _ t22.26 acres 1 / 1 UNDEVELOPED LANDS _ 1 1340 SPEAR STREET ray t G.N. Farrell Volume 877 Page 402 ne T-Vo r d(C PPd) 299.53' as'AG 2tO.94acres No35a4 w r.a ac I \ 0 ( N73'6740'E J/f" rPF feint) 24.46' '♦ n ro " s xI as• AG m ®> W. and M. Gilbert zt Open Space \�75 ?!52 ® Volume 209, Page 225 t "Pinnacle @ Spear" y S t J. Kelley VoluT r Pa re 283 t t NI Flean N873223E 1 "qF 1.25' AG 0.2' AG T srR � N G. and J. Farrell � 1 a2, Aee>�/� 7302 Speer SG Volume 142, Page 45 I! I / 7Po i.o re.�e) 1 I / 3 f" Mf h ±2.99 8C/B5 (aunt) N74 ?3. en S 4. yN I „� tl Ffu.M 4• n. I ac T 13W Spear Street ^"'i^P N74�/3f \ ` 3454 D. & L. / q23 1 \ I 3. I ♦ srs va�� T. & M. I / I N1¢ze,�• O ♦ Page 99 Wulfson II D. & C, Frar�oni I W ♦ i-Bar F d I Vol. 686 i HecAeC I as' AC \� act' \ I Page 349 Volume 211 79ar FPund \ I I Page 447 I aJ' Arc) 3/4" PF \ EsWe IPs I /� �^ 1 I G. Sporz)mskf F \ as" AG - V7 I I I and y D. Muhr Lavigne I VM. Dencker 111 I d19s0278 Volume 137 I gr ro F nd I I Page 287 I Page 323 l I 1 clmmoneff /e�F a2' AG 1 I , I `' • `��' I anon 1 � � � � I - E.�: �� Y C.,'a'• (IJW— ar ♦w �� Ac �!�a• LEGEND �o s FF SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE Q ro�o$ \ y — - - —OTHER PROPERTY LINE (APPROX) r• Q��• • CALCULATED POINT — — - ZONING BOUNDARY �e0 1.0AG R0A0 CMFAWF ❑ CONCRETE/MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND IPF/IRF O IRON PIPE/REBAR FOUND (w/SIZE) n "T BAR' FOUND AG ABOVE GROUND 5/8' REBAR w/ SURVEY MARKER, PROPOSED x---*--x FENCE LINE To the best of my knowledge & belief this plat properly depicts the results of a survey conducted GRAPHIC SCALE under my supervision as outlined in the notes above, based on our analysis of records & physical evidence found. Existing boundaries shown ore in substantial conformance with the record. This plat is in substantial conformance with 27 VSA 1403. ( Dr rRer I 1 inch - 100 ft Timothy R. Cowan VT. L.S. 597 SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC, P.O. BOX485 SHELBURNE, Vr 05482 802-88S2= FAX SOZWa 2271 web: www.cefl-At OAAIm PJM I JLM JLM TRC PRDIBCP. SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LOCATION MAP PLAT of SURVEY Lands of FARRELL & COLE 1302, 1340 & 1350 SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT DATE DRAWW(; NUI®ER NOV. 29, 2005 D"=1 S1.0 PROS. NO. 02250 T. J. Bovle and Associates T. J. Boyle a R. and M. Skiff 1645-00089 PG(3) BN(3) TO(7) CR(5) W2) TO(7) M. and M. Scollins 1160-00214 T. and L. Kleh ► 1160-00219 ► 8) -- 1,11119 Applicant: Ede Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlington. VT 05402 landscape architects . planning consultants 301 college sheet -burUngton oveffnont •05401 802,858,3565 hOPA—lboylb— 29, MW SPEAR MEADOWS Landscape and Lighting Plan L3 1: I r I. Isham Estate 3' X TX 5' HT. STONE COLUMN 0 5 70— 012 25 (LABEL BOTH SIDES) AR(S) / 8 X- ---------- ------201+oQ• 8 2L23d Gl ?g>� 2G3+OC 9 i - R 1\ x _ - -- - \ ----- f ipqq e ' vt Spe r, \ - 3 3r 1 � 1---- =--- -- -- --- --- ----- 392-- f vIfEm" r._. x 3' X 5- SOE COLUMN / ------ (LABEL BOTH SIDES) T---------------------------- / r , --- I ' I I !F •\ v ` yz� "\ 9 I ' I I I I _ � 1 W W CA %` . br�`� Ty'Y , h \\ \ ` K�1.?lj `\ ' ` � •".; `�+`� ` � n 1 I w r t I I I I I //'- IY LOT I I I 16 LOT 17 I = t+ LOT 18 I I I _ - r 1 I �-----------� W { 3y / ITNESS PLANTINGS TO DELWEATE I Iv W W R 1 ST STOR ATERFACILITYBWETLAN ti T(N6)IV IL,* CING h. �\ / 6 5 I , W W P r� ,W M 4 3 38 6 W \ r` 39 t -� C �a1 CM h Z 01 ' W W W W y W \ \ W W W W W W w W W V- 'V- W - 9W W W W W w_�. W W W W w w W w W W w W W W w W W� W w W w w w W w W w w w w W w W W ', W W w w v3` ll` `h •. y W,\ — z� �� W .\ w W v W W W W W C Q ; W` Q W W W W W W W w \ w/ W W w w w w W W •� \\ \\ WERAND 3 W W W W W W W w W W W W w w W \W Cq) w, . \laws � l W W w W W w w w w w w w b <\ IV 7 CP4 5) n Space ' -------- GIWLIME*SKEET L5 W w,' % __ i>ekt�t� W " w W w ��. Pinnacle dt Spear ����1� c�oa��a���aoa d Associates ' licant Eric Farrell wumrerreww u5.oaos ; ApP' landscape amhkem . PO Box 1335 � piarorirn3 consultants j Marl, zs. 20os � MEA DOWS W Jam^ SPE --- ----- - -- ---- -- --- _L4 revi:ore i.w.a ra<rx�nwraww u-0aos —_ — — — _J -- -- --_-- 307 college street • Burlington .vermont •05401 802 b58 w9656 nnpJtwww.gboyle.com I � 1" m 30' Landscape AT1d Lig}.ltlrig P18ri _ Burlington, VT 05402 w w _W W -- E wt yu�vu w w w — _ _ w •v..lr tGl� W a� w C W` c� CO(3) -------------- 't 0fi\W -IV(7) J w TC(<) '- W w w W W w w W c` �. •:w`.W ,i`w.•` W W �-_._.w w?r o r. W/��, w w w W w W w 1 CR(5) W W W w w W �A ••O PG(4 1 I w W W W w w w(w •, fit•-��,•`L', :�\W`w \7•w \� \ 3 % A, c B B �w 3 O 8 TC(13 9 � C •'� ` 1 s c` A I 9 J _ C � \J 3 9 O L s 6 D � h l) \\ �. Gilbert 9 3 ,. ' 6f In ` � ` ) 4 ti - A` -I 9 - �, l z + 3 X ; ♦ w' F f 0 t' r w I 1 "1 1aWID E PEDESTRIAN EAaME 1 V� C _ ll fi\ I I INOTALLNIEW � ENCEALO NG RY ON YOUNG PARCEL ELBUNDF \, I I h Y. � a` \9� t c: � I \o� I \ P t0 ` 1 O P 10 � ` A t C, / I _ ` aoisT ' Mz a :.Bt{II,dINGS�Yld18MkOroCY A' QOI(CE'FTlJ:4p�lES1Ol�•ta Mal TJ. Boyle and Associates ` F \\`\ `r V o aevlsl roNs _ Applicant: Eric Farrell landscape architects . planning consuril _ mjh March 29, zoos' _ SPEAR MEADOWS _ '[ C 1301collegestreet.burington.ver r roNtlmaieauedfarFx�elP1etR.Mex tz-osos -_-- �— PO8GX1335 mont.05401 802.858.3555 htlPJhnxv.tjboyb.can a 1"=30' Landscape and Lighting Plan LJ 1 —-- Bur{ington, VT 05402 -- - -- — -- - — STREET LIGHTING SCHEDULE: FIXTURE TYPE: PROV-H3 / 150 I"IH / BLK POLE TYPE: DBG-4R14-125 QUANTITY: 25 • Die cast alum num conatr,lclion far r alamxa. • Tad -tars access and removal at the reflector, lamp and ballast. • TYpa $ a a and s rdg -uroa: horizontal rellactors. ° YReomPRo mI.5 aal lamp • Asymmatrk and symrtretrlc indirect, C tafl opaCaI system. • 70 to 176 watts HID inclut ing T-6 COM lends and Wecboni: ballas Icr m01W OaNdo lamps. • Sapands did cast aluminum naasat module tat 00OW Operadpn and 'arondw—Pononl IRS. l - P—der coal 0nbh bT ten amndald colors with a polychrom' pdmor. Slippss r 4 Inch lermn for a- or Pol® nwunting ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIWMNG 11249 ArtmW Bculeverd • L• Mirada. CA 90530 IWni41 W4.2700 • fa. 171419844 v ,.RtLnet .a,apaw.aaaa..maa".a. Pvam ew"aa4awe. c"p mw= 4L�7)LIGHTING DETAILS Not To Scale Providence" Fags 6 of 6 SPECIFICATIONS WWOM:EM.. EPA: 1.30 bass brED-17lands¢.. G12 for use MO T9 limps. All wd,W am mllre �ipsrcaJxn eWmala »m maw+yl..+iradmm» ---- In.. ✓.'i"a rcn, _.-" '� Isatpryt YZlY Yais. Damped nUPRuamtrerseamala sh'N "� ""-- Fl ac ep: 120's2Ti voH'ufpm aM rated try 1° amrling. INDIRECT MODELS- LOWER LAMP MODULE -na Oa— nausag ans0 salaam Ns mmP medub Thu cover -ai: n» die cast alum rarm wah a mmpamal gmas term. Tna mmp anal as acaawd by Mnl j Aire m(rP—,g cover "— aquerlerNm. Tn"ads —1 b'jaal '.alwd.: . a uvir- On an evtematy nWnbw Iaaam kr dire_Ting me IgMI >ce upper Wleap-. dsxWs are madam baba to i �° �!r EG Tanaao du ror u�wm Te m�,vs. Ad 4at.Wa era I»daa mad pa am WMECT MODELS- UPPER REFLECTOWB car ' 1? (pa na de pee: aW mapper ho,wrlg anal mn6h eta halms[ N1R aa9embly aM nre mr,r,rOeecW The W.leas ba'lasl - mr san ki'S m adwmpil¢laexl -igia Ilp W lath alsl ! I n+ged ldp my .Tna bab#sh•ln .=sra F—ad " Vay w4t a cud disarmed PN19 he HID balad6 are igr 1 t pa4" r18Ca, rainy tar 30°F SmNrg 9as1aRO remudHap. 'ae ai the lactay kr� halm jf _. ___._._' —.4 to Mired relleClcr a mnur,tcd is Ue (mUaraMa of Ne apPc-r nambg Tns rag•mnr cnaN be did em aluminum, ensaed m ahgh reflsrbrace wNte. The k±6racl raPeclsr rtu!Mi6 shall REFLECTOR MODEL'-REFLECTOWLAMP as IFS Gawfeed as Baron wldr law^ Nan 1?t hnnm ounn4 Tha upper lama —is, -aO Oa dg cast naNnam. above 90 degrees. The'mtemal reugdm mctlala a aa4,dkd.1h.—JdL, q ,Mtn • n~ sieral a 9askal 11. rwe(ed g— lals -ae INSTALLATION a MOUNTING ba aaamd la OmhoL." ws, asiacsr,a gwNet One atalnbaa -'mP.•avgsncosenassna-de'soorysUmlledaca "teldi shall raaa.IM dos b MO. access ma lame -Taal. a, P—ow a4s'maiy. TM Tiaer 4fwe sdp over a mdw-w matlala eh t ae ad si melded dada" d•ifllprtn open top poi' or arm ard be secured and lamed wW Nra'sla,n W-WW am screws. and eM".as. UC fanodi.Wanrwn penal¢riggly aMCMtl ..' n a.ne deal ale nmm Musing Tre a mmaH oral vdnmul tools by eBng rtoul dtM our aptrg lasted Ins u,,p i Fanas Onsn Cp1nn9 01 a INS Slag' PremsMmem ra9lma" pasts.IN re0ada Amy shWl 3a—table an 90°amrtrs rAlhapdymarpMal sealer.sren dry an andmpaoeted it, alenting Ina Ngm denbmbn. Tire rod—W aM vsnl. wire a the—ast sup. TOO polymer ponder spat imish. mlpIsfi asWed—Mel-iES amndarda tar rue wlatl `ne emislasnall mad elm AAMA 0051 perblmana rolmctiy eyamma Pang. 3000 naur sot xpvdl— wnhll a aduW.e'sti REFLECTOR MODELS -BALLAST spray Awl M arrackn ruelcmna. The lower b•Ileffi hau3lW shed ae die.. andminlm. CE"MCATgN The bat -less bads., as>»ss ha wrvkag la x¢congilsned by 'K enure shah be hared with ETL tpr oa4t—, wet cation 6guan'r turn motbnalthe bP spud. Tnoballastendlbe uea, UL1693 aM(:anedlar GSA 5ttl. C222 rp:250 a'=65. mnurlad on a nmwo-ad vay wire a duce dtecnnnnd pNg MM» i.l me usA. edaLned t0 me and-lde alma awr. HID banana Me nlgn WARRANTY Poway lec[a.Tal. for-00T stadn9. E—nk baawb la, rixmm -all b.-. dad br three Years. Dallastcompanans melW naetle 1•mps ere souMrdadA S.ck- as na dlum can, me ballan manutadu w's Wasal waner4Y ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING _-1424OArtema RPtdevard. Le Mirada, CA908.:3 tel (114) MH-21.0 • Is. VIM 99aA)5 Wwwaal.net wwtl.,.mn>aa 4.v:.awP ce«mc�unn wm+renl ozrcn STONE VENEER a d a. I — - Ulm 2 4 ll FOOTER LI FREE STANDING COLUMN L7 r=v2° DO �J ENTRANCE WALL L7 r=va° Applicant: Eric Farrah PO Box 1335 Budinaton. VT 05402 VENEER ER 2 RETAINING WALL SECTION L7 r_1/2" landscape architects . planning consultants 301 college street o burlington .vermont a05401 802 .658 .3555 hOp:llwAw.fboyle.mm VENEER :R { 3 FREE STANDING WALL SECTION 0+ C OI f2 2%2%FP- (nd9L 102V 001�1�4G�3MOOG� m 29, 2005 _ SPEAR MEADOWS _ T AS NOTED l Site Details 71 50 NOTI R APPLI ;.A. §§ 6 Ly 14, 20 Supervis k J. Holti 938-6 for bed as: )nstructi all field y in 30 f or Ughti !d on CV iesburg, 'strict 4 E ission wit on under Applicati ation and aiLable fo wrg Muni i County ission loc e, South Listed bel oposed p Ionthe N s website lup) by cl 'ssion Cas ! Databas se numbe firing will 3efore Au iotifies th ' an issue asentation ing or the titter for h i. Any hea vriting to tate the c a at issue ired and ce will be 3ring. Any adjoining !r interest a petitio submitti ng, pleas U r r e PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board wilt hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hatt Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-06- 60 of The Schoolhouse Learning Center, Inc., to amend a previously approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of: 1) 160 single family lots, 2) 60 duplex units, and 3) a 15,200 sq. ft. private educational facility. The amend- ment consists of: 1) increasing the size.of the playground area, and 2) landscaping modifications, 8 Catkin Drive. 2. Final plat application #SD-06-61 of Century Partners, LP to amend a CE previously approved planned unit CATION development consisting of 96,700 001-6092 sq. ft. of general office and shop- 06, Chittenden ping center use in four (4) build- ory Union and fogs. The amendment consists of tk, filed application increasing the size of the 4 Market a project generally St. building by adding 532 sq. ft. of mezzanine space for a total GFA on of a two level of 15,532 sq. ft., 4 Market Street. press box approxi- 3. Final plat application #SD- eet in height with 06-62 of Allen Road Land Co. to ng. The project is amend a previously approved 44 Road in the Town unit planned unit development. Vermont. The amendment consists of: 1) nvironmental enlarging the PUD by 5.5 acres, l review this ap- and 2) constructing two (2) 31 Act 250 Rule 51- unit multi -family dwellings on 5.5 ons. Copies of the acres, 150 Allen Road. proposed permit 4. Final plat application #SD - review at the 06-63 of Spear Meadows, Inc. cipal Office, Chit- for re -approval of a planned unit Regional Planning development to subdivide 26.1 ated at 30 Kimball acres developed with two (2) single Burlington, and the family dwellings into: 1) 17 single ow. The application family Lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre Lot ermit may also be to be developed with six (6) two atural Resources (2)-family dwellings, 1302-1350 (www.nrb.state. Spear Street. icking on "District 5. Preliminary plat applicationSD es," selecting 4-06-66 and final plat applica- e," and entering tion #SD-06-67 of VT Wholesale above. Foods, Inc., DBA Harrington Bros. be held unless, for a planned unit development gust 15, 2006, a consisting of a 7500 sq. ft. build- e District Commis- ing with 5000 sq. ft. of warehouse or issues requiring use and 2500 sq. ft. of wholesale of evidence at distribution use. The amendment commission, sets consists of constructing a 3750 earing on its own sq. ft. addition for warehouse use, ring request shall 400 Patchen Road. the address below, 6. Final plat application #SD-06- riteria or sub- 70 of Jane Boisvert for a boundary why a hearing line adjustment between 95 and what additional 99 Holmes Road. presented at John Dinklage, Chairman hearing request South Burlington Development property owner Review Board ed person must Copies of the applications are n for party status. available for public inspection at ng a request for the South Burlington City Hall. contact the dis- July 26, 2006 lordinator at the telephone r listed below for more STATE OF VERMONT stion. Prior to convening a CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. i, the District Commission IN RE: I.B. etermine that substantive Vermont Family Court :equiring a hearing have Chittenden County used. Findings of Fact and Docket No. 207-4-06 CnJv SEVEN DAYS I july 26-august 02, Show and tell. Open 24/7/365. View and post up to, Post & browse ads 6 photos .per ad online. at your convenience. is ►► www.sevendaysvtocom [clic TO: Katie Labounty, mother of I.B., and Joshua Brunelle, father of I.B. You are hereby notified that a merits hearing to consider your parental fitness to parent I.B. will be held on August 15, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Chit- tenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Vermont. You are notified to appear in connection. with this case. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge 7-13-06 For Sale ----------------------- 4-BEDROOM FORECLOSURE only $86,900. For listings call 800- 749-8106 ext. G807. BOLTON VALLEY CONDO FSBO 2- bedroom, 2-bath end -unit. Fire- place. Freshly painted. Newer range/refrigerator. Steps to ski lifts! Incredible views! More photos and info http,//boLtoncondo.blogspot. com. Rob, 802-434-2714. BRISTOL 162-year-old historic farm house in country, fabulous views, 11 + acres, large kitchen, 3-bedroom, 1.5-bath, large south facing windows. Web: www.sover. net/—vim/House. 802-453-2076. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY Loca- tion and money maker. A Vermont inn by St. Mike's, I-89, close to the Largest downtown project ever, large kitchen, approx. 30,000 cars per day, a super hotel location. Easy owner/broker financing w/ little down. $599,000. 802-324- 3291. ivanland@aol.com. ESSEX JCT TOWNHOUSE Essex Jct. Townhouse: Rare 3-bedroom end unit, 2 full bath, 1370 sq. ft. and finished basement! Low fees. Move -in condition! $189,900 802- 74R-9670 nr am,;) bel.nn..ti-ram JERICHO FARMHOUSE Charming farmhouse w/4-bedroom, 3-bath, 2600 sq. ft. w/large attached barn. Large deck to fenced in backyard, 1.2 acres. Updated kitchen w/ brand new stainless steel appli- ances. Walking distance to corner store, coffee shop, swimming and snackbar. $335,900. Call 802-764- 5806. Pictures at www.wolfecre- ative.com/jerichoho use. LAKE VIEWS COLCHESTER Enjoy year-round take and mountain views from this well maintained ranch in quiet neighborhood. 2 plus bedroom, 2.5-bathroom and Large family room w/fireplace. Lake views from almost every room in house. Asking $337,000. Call 802-863-2219. RARE CITY LIVING Bright 1-bedroom condo, hdwd, open floor plan, park- ing, storage, walk to bike path, wa- terfront, and downtown. Call Paula, Teeson Real Estate, 862-6111. RICHMOND FOR SALE BY OWNER Modest Ranch Loaded w/character. Quiet, leafy neighborhood within walking distance to schools and village. 2-bedroom, 1-bath. Ga- rage. Stone patio. Town water and sewage. 802-434-6760. S. BURL. - TREETOP CONDO 2- bedroom, 1054 sq. ft. flat, first floor, good condition, economical propane heat, quiet cul-de-sac location, pool, tennis courts, car- port. Motivated seller. $158,000. 434-3749. SCHOOLHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS Fantastic 2-bedroom condo in former elementary school, high Ceilings, original architectural details, two lofts, tons of storage. Accessible location in Winooski. Great value at $19-0 K. Contact Pamela at 324-7729 for showing. SOUTH BURLINGTON 2-bedroom townhouse, 1.5-bath, convenient location, excellent interior, on busline. $214,900. 802-238-8684. SOUTH BURLINGTON CONDO Grandview, 960 sq. ft. townhouse located in convenient location, 2-bedroom, 1-bath, gas heat and hotwater, W/D, D/W, newer floor- ing, low association dues, new siding and roofs. Realtors wel- come, pre -approved buyers only. Asking $147,000. Motivated sell- er. 802-238-9882. SOUTH NORTHFIELD 3BEDS 2BA $182,000 Extra large master For Rent ---------------------_- BOLTON VALLEY SLOPESIDE 2/3 bedrooms,1.5-baths. Full base- ment, large deck, year lease/de- posit. $1200/mo. + utilities. 802-598-6391. 1 BDR WINOOSKI 1-bedroom unit in Winooski. Unit has just been remodeled. Many upgrades. Looks great. $700/mo. Call 355-4557 for more info. 2 BEDROOM, BURLINGTON Bright and spacious, sep. shower and bathroom, energy efficient, porch, off-street parking, rains. from top of Church St. $950/mo. + utils. 802-660-9029. 3-BEDROOM - BURLINGTON 1.5- bath townhouse. Full basement. Laundry hook-up. Avail. 8/01. Convenient to UVM/Champlain/ St. Michaels. NS/pets. $1350/mo. +dep.802-288-9702. 3-BEDROOM APT., ESSEX JCT. Near downtown, gas heat/hot water incl. Laundry hookups and storage avail. Excellent refs./ credit a must. No pets. $5000/mo. + dep. Call Paul, 802-879-3117. AFFORDABLE 4-BEDROOM HOME Four -bedroom house for rent in Monkton. (25 minutes south of Burlington ) Big country kitchen, open, sunny dining/living area, mud room, laundry room. Situated on4beautifulacres. $1500/month. Avai l.. -9/01. 802-989 -3493. BANK FORECLOSURES! Homes from $10,000! 1-3 bedroom available! HUD; Repos, REO, etc. These homes must sell! For List- ings call 1-800-425-1620 ext. H107. (AAN CAN) BOLTON Ski resort, brand new, 3- bedroom, 2.5 bath, 2-car garage, basement, deck. Ski in, ski out above quad lift. Beautiful views. S1750/mo. + dep. and utils. 802-434-7627. BOLTON VALLEY HOUSE Large house for rent in Bolton Valley. Quiet w/fenced in yard. $700/mo. incts: all except electric. $700 dep, upon move in. Call Dan, 802-434-5240. BRISTOL 3-BEDROOM APT Roomy 3-bedroom, 1-bath apt. in 4-plex, heat incL., close to town, huge yard, 2 ~gars parking, pets allowed +$15/mo., refs. and credit check. BL So in( pa it, BU Un cls an do BU D/ do, am 80, BU PH api do by ter do vis ing Op BU be( off mo BU res nis the par $8; lea BU 1-b tiol 80, BU 4-b 2nc tioi pet BUI St. MO. Hot Gre 802 BUI roo ing, and 802 BUI St., clo! util BUI sun lordinator at the telephone r listed below for more STATE OF VERMONT stion. Prior to convening a CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. i, the District Commission IN RE: I.B. etermine that substantive Vermont Family Court :equiring a hearing have Chittenden County used. Findings of Fact and Docket No. 207-4-06 CnJv SEVEN DAYS I july 26-august 02, Show and tell. Open 24/7/365. View and post up to, Post & browse ads 6 photos .per ad online. at your convenience. is ►► www.sevendaysvtocom [clic TO: Katie Labounty, mother of I.B., and Joshua Brunelle, father of I.B. You are hereby notified that a merits hearing to consider your parental fitness to parent I.B. will be held on August 15, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Chit- tenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Vermont. You are notified to appear in connection. with this case. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge 7-13-06 For Sale ----------------------- 4-BEDROOM FORECLOSURE only $86,900. For listings call 800- 749-8106 ext. G807. BOLTON VALLEY CONDO FSBO 2- bedroom, 2-bath end -unit. Fire- place. Freshly painted. Newer range/refrigerator. Steps to ski lifts! Incredible views! More photos and info http,//boLtoncondo.blogspot. com. Rob, 802-434-2714. BRISTOL 162-year-old historic farm house in country, fabulous views, 11 + acres, large kitchen, 3-bedroom, 1.5-bath, large south facing windows. Web: www.sover. net/—vim/House. 802-453-2076. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY Loca- tion and money maker. A Vermont inn by St. Mike's, I-89, close to the Largest downtown project ever, large kitchen, approx. 30,000 cars per day, a super hotel location. Easy owner/broker financing w/ little down. $599,000. 802-324- 3291. ivanland@aol.com. ESSEX JCT TOWNHOUSE Essex Jct. Townhouse: Rare 3-bedroom end unit, 2 full bath, 1370 sq. ft. and finished basement! Low fees. Move -in condition! $189,900 802- 74R-9670 nr am,;) bel.nn..ti-ram JERICHO FARMHOUSE Charming farmhouse w/4-bedroom, 3-bath, 2600 sq. ft. w/large attached barn. Large deck to fenced in backyard, 1.2 acres. Updated kitchen w/ brand new stainless steel appli- ances. Walking distance to corner store, coffee shop, swimming and snackbar. $335,900. Call 802-764- 5806. Pictures at www.wolfecre- ative.com/jerichoho use. LAKE VIEWS COLCHESTER Enjoy year-round take and mountain views from this well maintained ranch in quiet neighborhood. 2 plus bedroom, 2.5-bathroom and Large family room w/fireplace. Lake views from almost every room in house. Asking $337,000. Call 802-863-2219. RARE CITY LIVING Bright 1-bedroom condo, hdwd, open floor plan, park- ing, storage, walk to bike path, wa- terfront, and downtown. Call Paula, Teeson Real Estate, 862-6111. RICHMOND FOR SALE BY OWNER Modest Ranch Loaded w/character. Quiet, leafy neighborhood within walking distance to schools and village. 2-bedroom, 1-bath. Ga- rage. Stone patio. Town water and sewage. 802-434-6760. S. BURL. - TREETOP CONDO 2- bedroom, 1054 sq. ft. flat, first floor, good condition, economical propane heat, quiet cul-de-sac location, pool, tennis courts, car- port. Motivated seller. $158,000. 434-3749. SCHOOLHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS Fantastic 2-bedroom condo in former elementary school, high Ceilings, original architectural details, two lofts, tons of storage. Accessible location in Winooski. Great value at $19-0 K. Contact Pamela at 324-7729 for showing. SOUTH BURLINGTON 2-bedroom townhouse, 1.5-bath, convenient location, excellent interior, on busline. $214,900. 802-238-8684. SOUTH BURLINGTON CONDO Grandview, 960 sq. ft. townhouse located in convenient location, 2-bedroom, 1-bath, gas heat and hotwater, W/D, D/W, newer floor- ing, low association dues, new siding and roofs. Realtors wel- come, pre -approved buyers only. Asking $147,000. Motivated sell- er. 802-238-9882. SOUTH NORTHFIELD 3BEDS 2BA $182,000 Extra large master For Rent ---------------------_- BOLTON VALLEY SLOPESIDE 2/3 bedrooms,1.5-baths. Full base- ment, large deck, year lease/de- posit. $1200/mo. + utilities. 802-598-6391. 1 BDR WINOOSKI 1-bedroom unit in Winooski. Unit has just been remodeled. Many upgrades. Looks great. $700/mo. Call 355-4557 for more info. 2 BEDROOM, BURLINGTON Bright and spacious, sep. shower and bathroom, energy efficient, porch, off-street parking, rains. from top of Church St. $950/mo. + utils. 802-660-9029. 3-BEDROOM - BURLINGTON 1.5- bath townhouse. Full basement. Laundry hook-up. Avail. 8/01. Convenient to UVM/Champlain/ St. Michaels. NS/pets. $1350/mo. +dep.802-288-9702. 3-BEDROOM APT., ESSEX JCT. Near downtown, gas heat/hot water incl. Laundry hookups and storage avail. Excellent refs./ credit a must. No pets. $5000/mo. + dep. Call Paul, 802-879-3117. AFFORDABLE 4-BEDROOM HOME Four -bedroom house for rent in Monkton. (25 minutes south of Burlington ) Big country kitchen, open, sunny dining/living area, mud room, laundry room. Situated on4beautifulacres. $1500/month. Avai l.. -9/01. 802-989 -3493. BANK FORECLOSURES! Homes from $10,000! 1-3 bedroom available! HUD; Repos, REO, etc. These homes must sell! For List- ings call 1-800-425-1620 ext. H107. (AAN CAN) BOLTON Ski resort, brand new, 3- bedroom, 2.5 bath, 2-car garage, basement, deck. Ski in, ski out above quad lift. Beautiful views. S1750/mo. + dep. and utils. 802-434-7627. BOLTON VALLEY HOUSE Large house for rent in Bolton Valley. Quiet w/fenced in yard. $700/mo. incts: all except electric. $700 dep, upon move in. Call Dan, 802-434-5240. BRISTOL 3-BEDROOM APT Roomy 3-bedroom, 1-bath apt. in 4-plex, heat incL., close to town, huge yard, 2 ~gars parking, pets allowed +$15/mo., refs. and credit check. BL So in( pa it, BU Un cls an do BU D/ do, am 80, BU PH api do by ter do vis ing Op BU be( off mo BU res nis the par $8; lea BU 1-b tiol 80, BU 4-b 2nc tioi pet BUI St. MO. Hot Gre 802 BUI roo ing, and 802 BUI St., clo! util BUI sun SEVEN DAYS I july 26-august 02, Show and tell. Open 24/7/365. View and post up to, Post & browse ads 6 photos .per ad online. at your convenience. is ►► www.sevendaysvtocom [clic TO: Katie Labounty, mother of I.B., and Joshua Brunelle, father of I.B. You are hereby notified that a merits hearing to consider your parental fitness to parent I.B. will be held on August 15, 2006 at 11:00 a.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Chit- tenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Vermont. You are notified to appear in connection. with this case. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge 7-13-06 For Sale ----------------------- 4-BEDROOM FORECLOSURE only $86,900. For listings call 800- 749-8106 ext. G807. BOLTON VALLEY CONDO FSBO 2- bedroom, 2-bath end -unit. Fire- place. Freshly painted. Newer range/refrigerator. Steps to ski lifts! Incredible views! More photos and info http,//boLtoncondo.blogspot. com. Rob, 802-434-2714. BRISTOL 162-year-old historic farm house in country, fabulous views, 11 + acres, large kitchen, 3-bedroom, 1.5-bath, large south facing windows. Web: www.sover. net/—vim/House. 802-453-2076. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY Loca- tion and money maker. A Vermont inn by St. Mike's, I-89, close to the Largest downtown project ever, large kitchen, approx. 30,000 cars per day, a super hotel location. Easy owner/broker financing w/ little down. $599,000. 802-324- 3291. ivanland@aol.com. ESSEX JCT TOWNHOUSE Essex Jct. Townhouse: Rare 3-bedroom end unit, 2 full bath, 1370 sq. ft. and finished basement! Low fees. Move -in condition! $189,900 802- 74R-9670 nr am,;) bel.nn..ti-ram JERICHO FARMHOUSE Charming farmhouse w/4-bedroom, 3-bath, 2600 sq. ft. w/large attached barn. Large deck to fenced in backyard, 1.2 acres. Updated kitchen w/ brand new stainless steel appli- ances. Walking distance to corner store, coffee shop, swimming and snackbar. $335,900. Call 802-764- 5806. Pictures at www.wolfecre- ative.com/jerichoho use. LAKE VIEWS COLCHESTER Enjoy year-round take and mountain views from this well maintained ranch in quiet neighborhood. 2 plus bedroom, 2.5-bathroom and Large family room w/fireplace. Lake views from almost every room in house. Asking $337,000. Call 802-863-2219. RARE CITY LIVING Bright 1-bedroom condo, hdwd, open floor plan, park- ing, storage, walk to bike path, wa- terfront, and downtown. Call Paula, Teeson Real Estate, 862-6111. RICHMOND FOR SALE BY OWNER Modest Ranch Loaded w/character. Quiet, leafy neighborhood within walking distance to schools and village. 2-bedroom, 1-bath. Ga- rage. Stone patio. Town water and sewage. 802-434-6760. S. BURL. - TREETOP CONDO 2- bedroom, 1054 sq. ft. flat, first floor, good condition, economical propane heat, quiet cul-de-sac location, pool, tennis courts, car- port. Motivated seller. $158,000. 434-3749. SCHOOLHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS Fantastic 2-bedroom condo in former elementary school, high Ceilings, original architectural details, two lofts, tons of storage. Accessible location in Winooski. Great value at $19-0 K. Contact Pamela at 324-7729 for showing. SOUTH BURLINGTON 2-bedroom townhouse, 1.5-bath, convenient location, excellent interior, on busline. $214,900. 802-238-8684. SOUTH BURLINGTON CONDO Grandview, 960 sq. ft. townhouse located in convenient location, 2-bedroom, 1-bath, gas heat and hotwater, W/D, D/W, newer floor- ing, low association dues, new siding and roofs. Realtors wel- come, pre -approved buyers only. Asking $147,000. Motivated sell- er. 802-238-9882. SOUTH NORTHFIELD 3BEDS 2BA $182,000 Extra large master For Rent ---------------------_- BOLTON VALLEY SLOPESIDE 2/3 bedrooms,1.5-baths. Full base- ment, large deck, year lease/de- posit. $1200/mo. + utilities. 802-598-6391. 1 BDR WINOOSKI 1-bedroom unit in Winooski. Unit has just been remodeled. Many upgrades. Looks great. $700/mo. Call 355-4557 for more info. 2 BEDROOM, BURLINGTON Bright and spacious, sep. shower and bathroom, energy efficient, porch, off-street parking, rains. from top of Church St. $950/mo. + utils. 802-660-9029. 3-BEDROOM - BURLINGTON 1.5- bath townhouse. Full basement. Laundry hook-up. Avail. 8/01. Convenient to UVM/Champlain/ St. Michaels. NS/pets. $1350/mo. +dep.802-288-9702. 3-BEDROOM APT., ESSEX JCT. Near downtown, gas heat/hot water incl. Laundry hookups and storage avail. Excellent refs./ credit a must. No pets. $5000/mo. + dep. Call Paul, 802-879-3117. AFFORDABLE 4-BEDROOM HOME Four -bedroom house for rent in Monkton. (25 minutes south of Burlington ) Big country kitchen, open, sunny dining/living area, mud room, laundry room. Situated on4beautifulacres. $1500/month. Avai l.. -9/01. 802-989 -3493. BANK FORECLOSURES! Homes from $10,000! 1-3 bedroom available! HUD; Repos, REO, etc. These homes must sell! For List- ings call 1-800-425-1620 ext. H107. (AAN CAN) BOLTON Ski resort, brand new, 3- bedroom, 2.5 bath, 2-car garage, basement, deck. Ski in, ski out above quad lift. Beautiful views. S1750/mo. + dep. and utils. 802-434-7627. BOLTON VALLEY HOUSE Large house for rent in Bolton Valley. Quiet w/fenced in yard. $700/mo. incts: all except electric. $700 dep, upon move in. Call Dan, 802-434-5240. BRISTOL 3-BEDROOM APT Roomy 3-bedroom, 1-bath apt. in 4-plex, heat incL., close to town, huge yard, 2 ~gars parking, pets allowed +$15/mo., refs. and credit check. BL So in( pa it, BU Un cls an do BU D/ do, am 80, BU PH api do by ter do vis ing Op BU be( off mo BU res nis the par $8; lea BU 1-b tiol 80, BU 4-b 2nc tioi pet BUI St. MO. Hot Gre 802 BUI roo ing, and 802 BUI St., clo! util BUI sun > ;hpeaMojoo-� GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 FaceimiLe 802.658.1456 www. gravel she a.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@gravelshea.com September 12, 2008 District Commission #4 Attn.: Stephanie Monaghan, District Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Spear Meadows, Inc. Land Use Permit Amendment #4C1173-1 Dear Stephanie: Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly John R. Ponsetto Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Robert H. Rushford Andrew D. Manitsky Michelle N. Farkas William A. Mason, IV Matthew B. Byrne Karen K. O'Neill Enclosed please find the original and three copies Applicant's Memorandum in Response to Agency of Agriculture, along with our Certificate of Service. We will forward an electronic copy of the Memorandum under separate cover. Please be in touch with any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:jar Enclosure cc: Parties on Certificate of Service Clarke A. Gravel (1916.2002) Charles T. Shea Heather Briggs Of Counecl Norman Williams TimothyM. Eustace Special Couaeel Heather Rider Hammond Megan J. Shafritz Ross A. Feldmann STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Re: Spear Meadows, Inc. ) Land Use Permit Amendment #4C1173-1 c/o Farrell Real Estate ) P.O. Box 1335 ) Colchester, VT 05446 ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert H. Rushford, Esq., attorney for Spear Meadows, Inc., certify that on September 12, 2008, I served Applicants' Memorandum in Response to Agency of Agriculture, by causing a copy to be mailed, postage prepaid to the following: Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 efarrell(a)farrellrealestatevt.com Gary Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Plan, Comm City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County. Reg. P1an.Comm. 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 shilton@ccrpcvt.org Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney/ANR 103 S. Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 anr. act250(a)state.vt.us GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 Mike Kundrath/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 michael.kundrath@state.vt.us Craig Keller Utilities & Perrnits/VTrans One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 craiq.keller(a)state.vt.us Louise Waterman/Brendan O'Shea Vt. Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 louise.waterman(&state.vt.us: brendan.osheanstate.vt.us Diane Zamos, Esq. Ass't AG for Agency of Ag, Food & Markets 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05602 diane.zmos(a)state.vt. us Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 scott.dillon(&state.vt.us devin.coleman(&state.vt.us Dated: Burlington, Vermont September 12, 2008 Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street, 7th Floor P. O. Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 (802) 658-0220 For Applicant GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 N331825 vl -Spear Meadows [Farrell] Certificate of Service BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 y STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Re: Spear Meadows, Inc. ) Application No. 4C1173-1 c/o Farrell Real Estate ) P.O. Box 1335 ) Colchester, VT 05446 ) APPLICANT'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO AGENCY OF AGRICULTURE NOW COMES the Applicant, Spear Meadows, Inc., by and through its attorneys, Gravel and Shea, and submits the following response to the August 21, 2008 Memorandum from the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets (the "Agency"). INTRODUCTION The Agency objects to the use of the "involved land" analysis set forth in the Applicant's Petition because it contends that there are factual questions regarding the specific TDR lands at issue which need to be addressed and that, as a matter of law, the TDR lands may not be treated as involved land under Act 250. Further, while the Agency suggests that an appropriate circumstances analysis "may" be acceptable in this case, it argues that the evidence is insufficient to make positive findings at this time. The Applicant disagrees on both fronts. THE COMMISSION SHOULD PERMIT TDR LANDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS INVOLVED PROJECT LANDS FOR PURPOSES OF EVALUATING ON SITE MITIGATION As the Agency contends, the term "on site" refers to the Project tract, which for purposes of Act 250 jurisdiction, includes "involved land." The use of TDR lands in a development project is analogous to a planned unit development (PUD) project. In a PUD project, an applicant may combine "one or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land to be developed as a single entity, the plan for which may propose any authorized combination of density." 24 GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT D5402-0369 y V.S.A. § 4303(19). The purpose of a PUD is to "provide for flexibility in site and lot layout, building design, placement and clustering of buildings, use of open areas ... that will best achieve the goals for the area as articulated in the municipal plan." Id. § 4417(a)(4). PUD developments regularly involve the combination of tracts of land within the project area, the use of the total acreage from all parcels to calculate the allowed density, the clustering of dwellings within a designated development area and the creation of dedicated open space for the remaining portion of the land! This is a common and preferred method of land use planning. Typically, when the Commission reviews a PUD project under Criterion 9(B), the applicant is allowed to use the open space areas within the PUD for on site mitigation if the applicant can otherwise demonstrate that the open space mitigation area meets the Agency's size and soil quality requirements. See, e.g., Forest Park Realty Corporation, Land Use Permit No. 4C1197, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order at 8 (Jan. 23, 2008) (authorizing use of open space portion within PUD project as on site mitigation for impacts under Criterion 9(B)). The Applicant's use of TDR lands should be treated no differently from a PUD since the TDR lands are among the tracts associated with the Project which allow an increase in density and result in the corresponding creation of open space on the TDR lands. The Agency maintains that the Applicant's Petition must be denied as "a matter of law" because the Applicant has not established as a matter of fact that the TDR sending lands contain the appropriate amount of acreage of primary agricultural soils, that they are protected with traditional recorded conservation easements, and that the lands otherwise have been approved by the Agency and its partners. This objection fails for two reasons. First, the 1 Note that a PUD may "[ilnvolve single or multiple properties and one owner or multiple owners." 24 V.S.A. § 4417(b)(1). GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT D5402-0369 -2- y Agency's factual arguments ignore the proposed conditions set forth in the Applicant's Petition which were designed to address the need to have the Leducs join as co -applicants ,2 as well as to provide for the Agency's review and acceptance of the sending area as suitable for mitigation. See Petition at 8-9.3 Second, and even more fundamental, the Agency seems to have lost sight of the procedural posture of the Petition for Partial Findings. At this stage, the Applicant seeks only a legal ruling that, as a matter of law, the Applicant may in concept use the TDR sending lands as on site mitigation if those lands otherwise meet the Agency's applicable standards that would be followed if the TDR lands were treated as part of a PUD project.4 The Agency also claims that under its interpretation of the statute's plain meaning, "on site" can only refer to the land area where the buildings are located. However, the statute does not define the term "on site," nor does it specifically impose the limitation suggested by the Agency. Thus, the Agency's interpretation is based on its own narrowing of the language used in the statute. Because land use laws must be strictly construed in favor of the landowner, the 2 The Agency questions why the Applicant mentioned the "O'Brien" property at the hearing. The O'Brien lands are southerly and adjacent to the Leduc lands. They are not in South Burlington and cannot be used as TDR sending lands. Thus, the lands were mentioned only in passing as a point of reference. 3 The Petition offers the following conditions to be addressed when the Applicant files a complete application: 1. That the owner of the TDR sending parcel (i.e., the Leducs) sign the Act 250 Permit Application as a co -applicant to subject the mitigation area on the TDR sending lands to the terms and conditions of the Act 250 Permit. We note that the co -applicant may make a request for limited jurisdiction under the procedures outlined in the Stonybrook case. 2. That the Applicant submit a survey plan showing the TDR sending area/agricultural mitigation area. 3. That the Applicant review the TDR sending area/mitigation area with the Agency of Agriculture and obtain written confirmation that the proposed mitigation area is acceptable mitigation in terms of size and quality to offset the Project impacts under Criterion 9(B). 4 The Agency also suggests that for on site mitigation the TDR lands must be protected by permanent conservation easement rather than a permit condition. This is not an accurate reading of the law. According to 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(2), for a project located outside of a growth center, "[p]reservation of primary agricultural soils ... shall be enforceable by permit conditions issued by the district commission." (emphasis added); see also Vermont Natural Resources Panel, Statement of Procedure (eff. July 1, 2006) at 2 ("[a]ll primary agricultural soils preserved for agricultural use on a project tract shall, at a minimum, be protected by permit conditions issued by the district commission"). The Agency's reliance on section 6093(b) is misplaced. That section refers only to soils preserved by the "Vermont housing and conservation board pursuant to this section," indicating that where VHCB is given an off -site mitigation fee, it must preserve soils through the use of conservation easements. There is no corresponding statutory requirement for on site mitigation on a project tract. GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 -3- 1 Agency's proposed interpretation should not be followed. See In re Vitale, 151 Vt. 580, 584, 563 A.2d 613 (1989) ("it is a well -established rule in this state that in construing land use regulations any uncertainty must be construed in favor of the property owner"). Indeed, if the Agency's argument is taken to its logical conclusion (i.e., that only the tract where buildings are located may be used for on site mitigation), no separate open space tracts within a PUD project can ever be used for on site mitigation. Clearly, this outcome represents neither the intention of the Legislature nor actual practice, and the statute should not be read in a manner that creates an irrational result. Town of Killington v. State of Vermont, 172 Vt. 182, 188-89, 776 A.2d 395, 400-01 (2001) ("we will not enforce the common and ordinary meaning of statutory language if doing so would render the statute ineffective or lead to irrational results").5 Finally, the Agency argues that the TDR lands do not fall within the definition of "involved land" because they do not have an "impact on the values sought to be protected by Act 250." This argument is mistaken. As with any other PUD open space areas, the relationship between the TDR lands and the construction site has a significant impact on the values sought to be protected by Act 250. For example, these lands increase the density and corresponding impacts of the development area, they promote the clustering of development within a designated portion of the land and promote the preservation of open spaces that best achieve the goals for the area articulated in the municipal plan, thereby impacting several Act 250 Criteria, such as Criterion 8 (aesthetics) and Criterion 9 (municipal plan). If the Agency's s The Agency further contends that classifying the TDRs lands as "involved lands" which fall under the definition of on site mitigation defeats the statutory meaning of "off -site." This assertion should likewise be rejected. The Agency's suggestion that, under Applicant's interpretation, any remote lot could be offered as on site mitigation is unfounded. To the contrary, it is only by virtue of the transfer of the TDRs that the Leduc lands become "involved lands" and are therefore available for on site mitigation. Moreover, pursuant to the statute, off -site mitigation typically involves payment of a fee. Thus, allowing involved lands to serve as on site mitigation does not negate the legislative intent or meaning of the term off -site. GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 -4- position were adopted, then no open spaces lots associated with PUDs should be classified as involved lands. In short, contrary to the Agency's assertions, and as demonstrated above and in our Petition, the TDR lands satisfy the definition of "involved land" under Act 250. Accordingly, these lands should be classified as being part of the "project tract" for purposes of evaluating whether the TDR lands may be used for on site mitigation. ON THE PRESENT RECORD, THE APPLICANT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES As an alternative approach, the Agency suggests that it could accept the use of the TDR lands as on site or in lieu mitigation under the "appropriate circumstances" test instead of the "involved land" analysis.6 However, it concludes that there is insufficient evidence to reach this conclusion. The Applicant disagrees. In the event that the Commission cannot find that the TDR lands constitute "involved lands" which are connected to the Project tract and thus potentially may be used for on site mitigation, the Commission has a sufficient record before it 6 "Appropriate circumstances" for off -site mitigation outside a growth center has been defined by the Senate Natural Resources Committee to mean: "circumstances in which agricultural viability of the subject parcel is limited, where the use of surrounding parcels is non-agricultural, and where off -site mitigation will best further the goal of preserving primary agricultural soils for present and future agricultural use with special emphasis on protecting prim[e] agricultural soils." Act 250 Training Manual at 12. See also Vermont Natural Resources Board, Land Use Panel, Statement of Procedure (eff. July 1, 2006) which provides that a finding of "appropriate circumstances" may be based on the following findings by a district commission: (i) the tract of land containing primary agricultural soils is of limited value in terms of contributing to an economic or commercial agricultural operation and that devoting the land to agricultural uses is considered to be impractical based on the size of the tract of land, or its location in relationship to other agricultural and nonagricultural uses, or (ii) the project tract is surrounded by or adjacent to other high density development with supporting infrastructure and, as a result of good land use design, the project will contribute to the existing compact development patterns in the area; or (iii) the area contains a mixture of uses, including commercial and industrial uses, and a significant residential component, supported by municipal infrastructure; and (iv) the district commission determines that payment of an offsite mitigation fee, or some combination of onsite and offsite mitigation, will best further the goal of preserving primary agricultural soils for present and future agricultural use with special emphasis on protecting prime agricultural soils thus serving to strengthen the long-term economic viability of Vermont's agricultural resources. GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 5 - P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 F to determine that appropriate circumstances exist to allow some form of off -site mitigation to be used for the Project. 1. Appropriate Circumstances for Off -Site Mitiization Given the Project's location and size, the surrounding residential lands, and the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan, appropriate circumstances exist for off -site mitigation. First, the Project tract is of limited value as a commercial agricultural operation and devoting the lands to agriculture is impractical based on the size of the tract and its location. As noted in the Applicant's Petition, the Project tract is surrounded on nearly all sides by existing residential properties and/or residential projects. Although the University of Vermont owns a field on the north side of the Project tract, this field has not been cultivated for several years and the associated barn across the street is now used for storage. The Project is also located on a major arterial road (Spear Street) and near a significant intersection with Swift Street, which make the use of the Project lands impractical for a commuting farmer. Second, the City has designated the Project tract as a "receiving area" for TDRs, meaning that it is an area the City has specified as appropriate for higher density neighborhoods. Consistent with this designation, the Project tract is located in the sewer core and existing municipal and water lines are available for the Project. Finally, the in -kind use of the Leduc lands (as described below) will further the goals of preserving the long-term economic viability of larger tracts of agricultural lands. 2. Off -Site Mitigation Fee or In -Kind Contribution Since appropriate circumstances exist for off -site mitigation, the Applicant should be permitted to mitigate the Criterion 9(B) impacts by paying a fee to the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board. However, the Applicant also requests a finding that it may use the Leduc lands as an in -kind contribution in lieu of an off -site mitigation fee. This finding is consistent GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 with the City's Comprehensive Plan because it encourages the preservation of the Leduc sending areas. In addition, there is no language in the statute which requires off -site mitigation outside a designated growth center to be in the form of a fee to the Vermont Housing & Conservation Board. We note that in its description of off -site mitigation within a growth center, the Legislature was quite specific in stating that the mitigation must be made by paying "an offsite mitigation fee into the Vermont housing and conservation trust fund established under section 312 of this title for the purpose of preserving primary agricultural soils." 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(1). However, in its description of "appropriate circumstances" for off -site mitigation outside of a growth center, the Legislature did not specifically mandate the payment of a fee to the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board for off -site mitigation. Instead, the Legislature provided the Commission with the flexibility to determine the form of mitigation by stating that the Commission "may, in appropriate circumstances, approve off -site mitigation or some combination of onsite and off -site mitigation if that action is deemed consistent with the agricultural elements of local and regional plans and the goals of section 4302 of Title 24." See Hopkinton Scout Leaders Ass'n v. Town of Guilford, 176 Vt. 577, 579, 844 A.2d 753 (2004) ("Where the Legislature includes particular language in one section of statute but omits it in another section of the same act, it is generally presumed that the Legislature did so advisedly."). Accordingly, the Commission has the statutory authority to allow the in -kind contribution of the Leduc lands in lieu of an off -site mitigation fee.7 7At the hearing, a question was raised as to whether the "clustering" requirement for mitigation could be met under the alternative "appropriate circumstances" analysis since, under that analysis, the TDR lands would not be classified as part of the project, leaving little or no open space on the project tract. However, where, as here, "appropriate circumstances" exist for off -site mitigation outside of a growth center, the clustering requirement should not be applicable. This is consistent with the legislative interpretation of § 6086(a)(9)(B)(iii). See Vermont Natural Resources Board Memorandum (October 19, 2006) at 4 (proposed rules to "make it clear that, in cases which are appropriate for "mitigation flexibility" the clustering provisions of § 6086(a)(9)(B)(iii) need not apply. The Panel believes Rule 80(C)(1) carries out the intent of the legislature"); see also Act 250 Training Manual, Criterion 9(B) at 9 (where appropriate circumstances are shown for off -site mitigation outside of a growth center, GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW _ P. O. Box 369 - 7 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant requests a finding that the Leduc TDR lands are involved lands that may be used by the Applicant for "on site" mitigation subject to the conditions outlined in the Applicant's Petition. In the event the Commission is unable to make such a finding, then the Applicant requests a finding that "appropriate circumstances" exist for "off -site" mitigation and the Applicant may either pay an off -site mitigation fee to the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board or may mitigate soil impacts through the in -kind use of the TDR lands if such lands are otherwise appropriate in size and soil quality for mitigation. Dated: Burlington, Vermont September 12, 2008 Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street, 71h Floor P. O. Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 (802) 658-0220 "it can be argued that the Commission can allow a project, even if clustering does not result in retained land large enough to support or contribute to an economic or commercial agricultural operation"). <Farrell Memorandum in Response to Agency of Agriculture (Spear)/331177/73jd01i.D0C/RHR> GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 IFi1. WILLIAM H. SORRELL ATTORNEY GENERAL. JANET C. MURNANE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM E. GRIFFIN. q CHIEF ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF VERMONT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 109 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05609-1001 August 21, 2008 District #4 Environmental Commission Natural Resources Board 11 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: In re Spear Meadows, Inc., Application #4C 1173-1 Dear District Coordinator: TEL.: (802) 828-3171 FAX: (802) 828-2154 TTY: (802) 828-3665 CIVIL RIGHTS: (802) 828-3657 http://www.atg.state.vt.us Enclosed for filing with the Commission, please find four (4) copies of the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets' written Response to Applicant's Petition for Partial findings under Criterion 9(B) and its Certificate of Service. Please note for the service list that my e-mail address is dzamos(a atg.state.vt.us. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4f4�- (A- e' Diane E. Zam� Assistant Attorney General Enc. Cc w/ enc.: Service List . V IJRMONT STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RE: Spear Meadows, Inc. ) Application #4C 1173-1 c/o Farrell Real Estate ) P.O. Box 1335 ) Burlington, VT 05402-1335 ) AGENCY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND MARKETS' RESPONSE TO APPLICANT'S PETITION FOR PARTIAL FINDINGS UNDER CRITERION 9(B) NOW COMES the State of Vermont, Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets (the "Agency"), through the Attorney General, and files its response to the Applicant's request for partial findings on Criterion 9(B). Introduction The. Applicant has requested four partial findings under Criterion 9(B) pursuant to Natural Resources Board (NRB) Rule 21 and 10 V.S.A. § 6086(b). Specifically, the Applicant seeks findings by the Commission that: (a) The Project is located outside a designated growth area; (b) The Project lands will include the transfer of development rights (TDRs) by recorded conveyance from a nearby farm; (c) The TDR sending lands are "involved lands" that are connected to the Project, and (d) The TDR sending lands can be used to satisfy the onsite mitigation required by 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(2). See Applicant's Petition for Partial Findings at 1-2. The Agency agrees with Applicant's first proposed finding; that is, the project is located outside of a designated growth area. The Applicant has, at this point in time, provided inadequate evidence to establish certain essential facts for its remaining three requested findings on criterion 9(B). Assuming, however, the Applicant does 1 eventually establish those facts, the Applicant's requested rulings that transferrable development rights (TDRs) sending lands are "involved lands" and that TDR sending lands can, as a matter of law, be used to satisfy onsite 9(B) mitigation should be denied. The Commission, moreover, need not reach these questions in light of the mitigation flexibility for primary agricultural soils advisedly inserted into 10 V.S.A. § 6093 by the Vermont Legislature in 2006. The Agency fully supports the Applicant's efforts and desire to address the 9(B) criterion early in its application process.. The Agency is intrigued, in concept, by Applicant's proposal to address mitigation of impact on primary agricultural soils on the project site through the purchase of TDRs from offsite lands and the preservation of those offsite lands if such action, on a case -by - case basis, is consistent with the agricultural elements of local and regional plans, the goals of 24 V.S.A. §4302, and criterion 9(B). The potential use, however, of TDRs on a project site cannot, alone, satisfy 9(B) mitigation as a matter of law. The TDR sending lands must contain the appropriate amount of acreage of primary agricultural soils, be protected with traditional recorded conservation easements that extinguish all development rights as well as recorded agricultural use covenants held by an appropriate land steward, and be approved by the Agency and any appropriate conservation partners, such as the Vermont Housing and Conservation Board, in order to effectuate the intent of Act 250 and Act 200. At this point in time, Applicant's plan is too preliminary and unsupported by competent evidence for the Agency to give its 2 approval and in any event the law does not support the requested findings or proposed permit conditions. ARGUMENT I. Applicant has not carried its burden on certain essential facts NRB Rule 21 contemplates situations where an Applicant seeks partial review and a preliminary legal ruling on certain criterion. The Rule also contemplates situations where, as here, despite an Applicant's request for preliminary findings, there remain unanswered questions and facts not conclusively established: If the district commission is unable to make such findings of fact supporting a conclusion of law by reasons of inadequate evidence or information, it shall inform the applicant and all parties. NRB Rule 21 (D). In this case, the Applicant had not provided adequate evidence or information for the Commission to make the requested findings on criterion 9(B). The Applicant has failed to meet and carry its burden of proof and its request should be denied. 10 V.S.A. §6088(a), In re Spear Street Associates, 145 Vt. 496, 500, 494 A.2d 138, 140 (1985). For instance, the Applicant has not yet presented specific or competent evidence, such as recorded conveyance, signed purchase and sale, or other executed instrument, to support its requested findings. In its written request, Applicant referenced lands in a TDR sending district owned by LaDuc. At hearing, it referenced lands owned by both LaDuc and O'Brien. At this point, there is not competent evidence that TDRs, which are interests in land, have been or will be purchased, or that appropriate conservation easements and 3 agricultural covenants would be in place upon the remaining land, that the Agency is satisfied appropriate 9(B) mitigation had been secured or would be secured, or that Applicant has negotiated an agreement with the Agency to satisfy the 9(B) mitigation. Nor has the Applicant yet made the appropriate and required showing that the lands in the sending district contain primary agricultural soils in sufficient quantity to satisfy, at a minimum, the 2:1 ratio for primary agricultural soils impacted on the project site as required by statute. 1 See 27 V.S.A. Chapter 5 (requirements for conveyance of interests in land), 10 V.S.A. §6093(b) (impact to primary agricultural soils mitigated under this statute must be preserved and protected by permanent easements conveyed to a qualified holder and enforced in perpetuity). See also Applicant's Petition for Partial Findings at 3-4 (only in the process of negotiating purchase of TDRs and acquiring agricultural covenant that would satisfy mitigation under 10 V.S.A. §6093). There is inadequate evidence to establish essential facts and the Commission, at this point in time, cannot make the requested findings or impose the specific permit conditions Applicant seeks. See Applicant's Petition for Partial Findings at 8-9. 2 1 Applicant acknowledged at hearing that it had not yet had the soils analyzed on the parcel(s) from where it was seeking to purchase TDRs. The Agency's preliminary investigation, made without firm knowledge of the exact location of the acreage or the size, leads it to believe that there is some likelihood that the LaDuc parcel, from which TDRs might be acquired, contains some primary agricultural soils. 2 Applicant indicated at hearing that it intends to revise its development plan. Without an idea of how many acres of primary agricultural soils on the project site might be impacted and the value of those soils, the Agency and the Commission are left to speculate on how much mitigation is required under 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(9)(iv) through the application of 10 V.S.A. §6093. M At this point in time, the evidence supports a finding of Applicant's good faith intentions. Applicant intends to acquire some unspecified number of TDRs from one or more parcels in a TDR sending district, perhaps as many as 1.2 units per acre, from an unspecified number of acres that are currently used for some type of farm and that those acres may or may not contain primary agricultural soils. The evidence also supports, through Applicant's testimony at hearing, there could remain upon the sending parcel some right of development, even with the purchase and removal of TDRs, but not at the full density otherwise allowed by the local plan. There is inadequate evidence, however, to establish the essential facts needed for the legal ruling, the specific requested findings, or the permit conditions the Applicant seeks. NRB Rule 21(D). The request should be denied. II. TDRs do not satisfy 9(B) mitigation as a matter of law The Applicant has asked the Commission consider TDR sending lands as "involved land" thereby classifying the TDR sending land as part of the project so that the TDR sending land may be considered "onsite" for purposes of 9(B) mitigation. The Commission should deny Applicant's request as a matter of law. Applicant's creative interpretation is not supported by the plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093, the plain language of Board Rule 2(C)(5) which defines "involved land," or the inherent nature of TDRs. A. The plain language of 10 V.S.A. $6093 needs no interpretation The Vermont Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the paramount goal in construing a statutory provision is to give effect to the intent of the 5 Legislature. Killington v. State, 172 Vt. 182, 188, 776 A.2d 395, 400 (2001). The Court accepts the plain meaning of statutory language as the Legislature's intent, without looking further, if the meaning of the language is unambiguous and resolves the issue without doing violence to the legislative scheme. Killington, 172 Vt. at 188-89, 776 A.2d at 400-01. Here, the plain meaning of the term "onsite" in the 9(B) mitigation statute is clear and needs no further interpretation. The uncontroverted evidence is that Applicant's project is located outside of a designated growth center and therefore suitable mitigation for the project's impact to primary agricultural soils, necessary to satisfy 10 V.S.A. §6086(a)(9)(B)(iv), is outlined in 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(2). The plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(2) uses the term "onsite." The plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(3)(B) uses the term "onsite" and the term "off -site": Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (2) of this subsection... the district commission may, in appropriate circumstances, approve off -site mitigation or some combination of both onsite and off -site mitigation...." The plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(1) also uses the term "offsite." The use of the terms "onsite" and "off -site" in the 9(B) mitigation statute is clear, especially in light of the plain language of the introductory sentence: Suitable mitigation for the conversion of primary agricultural soils necessary to satisfy subdivision 6086(a)(9)(B)(iv) of this title shall depend on where the project tract is located. 10 V.S.A. §6093(a). The project tract is "onsite." In light of the plain language, "off -site" cannot also mean "onsite' without doing violence to the legislative 31 scheme. Killington, 172 Vt. 188-89, 776 A.2d at 400-01. If the Commission accepts Applicants argument that "onsite" for purposes of mitigation outside of a designated growth center can actually means a tract of land offsite from the site being impacted, the ordinary meaning of the terms "off -site" and "onsite," which were purposefully used by the Legislature, would be manifestly defeated. Id., See also Bergeron u. Boyle, 2003 VT 89, ¶ 11 n.1, 176 Vt. 78, 838 A.2d 918 (courts should avoid statutory construction that leads to absurd result), Payea u. Howard Bank, 164 Vt. 106, 107, 663 A.2d 937, 938 (1995)("When construing a statute, we presume that language is inserted advisedly."). B. The definition of "involved land" does not transform "off -site" to "onsite" Applicant urges the Commission to consider an offsite tract of land in a TDR sending district, from which TDRs will be purchased and removed by recorded instrument, as "involved lands" and therefore also consider the land from which the TDRs have been severed as "onsite" for purposes of satisfying mitigation required by 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(2). This interpretation should be rejected. It is not supported by the plain language of the NRB's Rule defining "involved land." In re Williston Inn Group, 2008 VT , §11, Vt. , 949 Vt. 1073, 1079 (court applies same rules of construction to regulations and discerns intent of drafters through plain meaning of regulatory language), Killington, 172 Vt. at 188-90, 776 A.2d 400-01. The definition of "development" for purposes of Act 250 is defined by statute. 10 V.S.A. §6001(3)(A). The definition includes the term "involved land" 7 but the statute itself does not define what that term means. The NRB has, through promulgated rule, defined the term "involved land," in pertinent part, as including: (a) The entire tract or tracts of land, within a radius of five miles, upon which the construction of improvements for commercial or industrial purposes will occur, and any other tract, within a radius of five miles, to be used as part of the project or where there is a relationship to the tract or tracts upon which the construction of improvements will occur such that there is a demonstrable likelihood that the impact on the values sought to be protected by Act 250 will be substantially affected by reasons of that relationship. NRB Rule 2(C)(5); 3 V.S.A. §845(a)(rules have the full force and effect of law). The plain language of the definition itself speaks to the impact of the development project upon the values sought to be protected by Act 250. Here, it is the TDRs severed from the land will be used as part of the project. The Applicant intends to use the TDRs to further impact density of housing upon the project tract. Contrary to Applicant's urging, the TDR sending tract of land is not being used as part of the project. The fact that "other" tracts of land are mentioned in the definition of "involved land" in no way transforms mitigation of impact into impact itself, thereby conferring Act 250 jurisdiction over the offsite parcel. The plain language of the definition does not support an interpretation that bootstraps into Act 250 jurisdiction a separate tract of land off -site from the tract being developed. In re Vermont RSA Limited Partnership, 2007 VT 23 19, 181 Vt. 589, 591, 925 A.2d 1006, 1009 (Entry Order)(underlying purpose of Act 250 is "to regulate impacts of development.")(emphasis in original); In re Audet, 2004 VT 30, 114, 176 Vt. 617, 621, 850 A.2d 1000, 1005 (Entry Order)(Act 250 protects "from the impacts of unplanned and uncontrolled changes in land use.")(emphasis added) Cf. In re Hinsdale Farm, 2004 VT 72, ¶15, 11, 177 Vt. 115, 117, 118, 858 A.2d 249, 251, 252 (when intent can be ascertained from plain language, no interpretation is needed and court will not invent jurisdiction in the absence of express grant). The land from which TDRs are purchased is not impacted by -the project, as contemplated by the Board's definition, even if the land lies within five miles of the project site. C. TDRs alone, by their very nature, cannot satisfy 9(B) mitigation as matter of law. TDRs are interests in land which may impact, for purposes of Act 250, the land to which they are subsequently applied in a receiving district by increasing the density of development that would otherwise be allowed. The land from where the development rights are purchased and severed by recorded conveyance is not impacted in the manner contemplated by Act 250: TDRs, of course, have nothing to do with the use or development of the land to which they are (by regulatory decree) "attached." The right to use and develop one's own land is quite distinct from the right to confer upon someone else an increased power to use and develop his land .... In essence, the TDR permits the landowner whose right to use and develop his land has been restricted or extinguished to extract money from others .... the marketable TDR, [is) a peculiar type of chit which enables a third party ...to use his land in ways the government would otherwise not permit.... Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725, 747, 117 S.Ct. 1659, 1671 (1997)(J. Scalia, concurring)(emphasis in original). In essence, by their very nature, TDRs or the use of them upon a development project cannot, as a matter of law, satisfy criterion 9(B) because they "have nothing to do with the 9 use or development of the land to which they are (by regulatory degree) 'attached."' Id. The Applicant's request for a ruling to the contrary should be denied. I11. The mitigation flexibility in 10 V.S.A. §6093 obviates the need for the preliminary ruling_ requested by Applicant. The preliminary findings requested by Applicant are not necessary in light of the mitigation flexibility advisedly inserted into the plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093 (a)(3)(B) in 2006. The Commission, therefore, need not make the requested findings in order for the project to move forward. Although the plain language of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(2) requires "on site" mitigation, the specific language of the statute's "mitigation flexibility" can provide common sense relief for the Applicant, the Commission, and the Agency when considering mitigation for a project's impact on primary agricultural soils: Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (2) of this subsection pertaining to a development or subdivision on primary agricultural soils outside a designated growth center, the district commission may, in appropriate circumstances, approve off -site mitigation or some combination of onsite and off -site mitigation if that action is deemed consistent with the agricultural elements of local and regional plans and the goals of section 4302 of title 24. For projects located outside a designated growth center, all factors used to calculate suitable mitigation acreage or fees, or some combination of these measures, shall be as specified in this subsection, subject to a ration no less than 2:1 but no more than 3:1. 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(3)(B). It is evident from the plain language of this subsection, as well as its placement on even par with subsections (a) (1) and (a)(2) of §6093 and enumerated as (a)(3), the legislature vested district 10 commissions with discretion, on a case -by -case basis, to deviate from the specific requirements of prescribed "onsite" and "offsite" mitigation in 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(1) and (a)(2). The mitigation flexibility in the statute can be used in "appropriate circumstances." This term is not specifically defined in law; that is, either in statute or the NRB's Rules. This case may be, when Applicant's plan and certain essential facts are more fully developed, the type of situation the legislature had in mind when it added the flexibility language of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(3)(B).3 Here, it is undisputed that the project is located outside of a designated growth center but within a town that has adopted a comprehensive plan. It is undisputed that the comprehensive plan currently in effect permits the transfer of development rights from sending districts to receiving districts. One of the objectives of the plan is to "maintain opportunities for traditional and emerging forms of agriculture that can be complementary with a growing city." City of Burlington Comprehensive Plan at 9 (Mar, 9, 2006) at 74 (#6). In the Agency's view, this could be a case contemplated by the legislature when it specifically authorized mitigation flexibility and the use of a mitigation agreement entered by the Agency and the Applicant. In light of the specific language of 10 V.S.A. §6093, the Commission need not reach the legal issues 3 The NRB's Act 250 Training Manual makes reference to a Senate Natural Resources Committee definition of the term: "circumstances in which agricultural viability of the subject parcel is limited, where the use of surrounding parcels is non-agricultural, and where off -site mitigation will best further the goal of preserving primary agricultural soils for present and future agricultural use with special emphasis on protecting prim[e] agricultural soils." NRB Training Manual (Criterion 9(B)) at 12. 11 raised by the Applicant in its petition. 4 Until Applicant provides more information, however, it is too soon to make a determination or partial findings on criterion 9(B), to determine whether this is a case of "appropriate circumstances," to issue permit conditions, or order the Applicant and Agency to negotiate an offsite mitigation agreement. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, the Agency requests that the Commission deny the Applicant's petition for preliminary findings on criterion 9(B) and rule, as a matter of law, that although TDRs do not, by themselves, satisfy mitigation required for impact to primary soils under criterion 9(B), the underlying land may, on a case -by -case basis and with the support of the Agency and the town, satisfy some part of the necessary mitigation for impact to primary agricultural soils as contemplated by the flexibility provisions of 10 V.S.A. §6093(a)(3). Dated at Montpelier, this 21 st day of August, 2008. WILLIAM H. SORRELL ATTORNEY GENERAL Attorney for the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets by: l - �.►.,.� Diane E. Za s Assistant Attorney General 4 The Applicant in its petition has, as an alternative, requested an opportunity to demonstrate "appropriate circumstances." See Applicant's Petition for Preliminary Findings at 5 (fn. 2). 12 STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION IN RE: Spear Meadows, Inc. ) Application #4C 1173-1 c/o Farrell Real Estate ) P. O. Box 1335 ) Burlington, VT 05402-1335 ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Kathy Vanderbloom, certify that on August 22, 2008 1 forwarded copies of the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets' Response To Applicant's Petition For Partial Findings Under Criterion 9(B) by First -Class Mail in a sealed and properly stamped envelope to the attached service list: Spear Meadows, Inc. Eric Farrell 1350 Spear Street Farrell Real Estate South Burlington, VT 05403 P. O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Gary Farrell Robert Rushford, Esq. 1350 Spear Street Gravel & Shea South Burlington, VT 05403 76 St. Paul Street, Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-369 Chair, City Council/ Chair City Plan. Comm. Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Atty. City of So. Burlington Agency of Natural Resources 575 Spear Street 103 So. Main St., Center Bldg. South Burlington, VT 05403 Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 Chittenden Co. Regional Plan. Comm. 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Craig Keller Utilities 8s Permits/VTrans One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 Mike Kundrath, Public Serv. 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05602-2601 Div. for Historic Preservation National Life Bldg., Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 Louise Waterman/Brendan O'Shea Vt. Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 By. �Ianderbloom cc: District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Little, Chair Chuck Dunham/Gene Richards 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Thomas Kleh 219 Meadowood Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael Scollins 214 Meadowood Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 s � � c /a �$/A' Z• De, w r� S�r e4 1-),7 St w t v /net, /-.,I v < 3� Se w t Y Se YV C g �s �C u 17/ ,G t • cu -Ie tc Yu J t �, X -74S J G 7 /$ 4u .� ici . , c -7 Ila Ir- Z) ko.,* (4) to, A ev C e- c -5 4- 1 le�fl -" 4.s Cf/7C_G, /-3 $ e -Lj e Y /7) 17 /l I S g /71-5-tc.0 _f- I,- 2o wis Y South Burlington Public Worke 575 DORSE SOUTH BURLINGTOI TEL: (802)1 FAX: (802)q it November 4, 2005 Alan Marcelino, President A. Marcelino & Company, Inc. P.O. Box 195 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Categorical Waste Disposal Area Amount Dear Alan: I have received your lett6r of October 31, 2005. touch with Barb Sch endtner. The pile was me time to finish the Iculations and then have the of material meaa�ured in the pile was calculated Engineer wassatisfied with our calculations. TI date was 3,3�42 cubic yards. Pleaseeep us advise the prog you m y need. I can be reac-hed at 658-7961 or Sin rely, Bruce K. Hbar Director of Public Works In that lets,., /ydu stated that you have been in asured %�CGober 24th 2005. It took a little bit of work reGiewed by the City Engineer. The amount usipq the average end area method. The City ie'amount of material in the pile on the above settling the NOAV and also any other information sbpwbkh(a-adelphia. net. CC: Chuck Hafter, City Manager P. Howard Flanders Dime or Waft Management Division Steven Stitzel,_S.titz6( Page & Fletcher, P.C.—�� Bill Szyman-si, South Burli4ton City Engineer Tony Barbagallo, Chittenden Solid Waste District Barb Schwendtner & Ja�es S rrwi#5, Solid Waste VERMONT State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation [phone] 802-879-5656 Wastewater Management Division [fax] 802-879-3871 Essex Regional Office ill West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov December 19, 2oo8 Spear Meadows, LLC c/o Brent Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington VT 05403 Subject WW-4-2587 Spear Meadows combine 3 pre-existing lots and subdivide into 20 lots; Lots 1-18 each for a proposed 4 bedroom single family residence, Lot #20 with an existing single family residence and Lot i9 for proposed 6 duplexes with a total of 36 bedrooms located on Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: On December 20, 2007 this office agreed to keep this project in pending status at the request of the applicant, with the understanding that the project was being actively redesigned and that the project would be resubmitted in the near future. To date we have not received any additional information. We are not able to leave applications in pending status indefinitely. Therefore, please submit all the previously requested information or a revised design within 3o days of the date of this letter. If we do not receive the information, we will assume that you have abandoned the project and we will deny the application for a permit as the information submitted so far is insufficient to determine if the project meets the minimum standards of the Environmental Protection Rules. If you do submit the information requested, we will continue our review of the project. If you have any questions as to what is needed, please contact us. Sincerely, a4�tl-C�.4 M Dolores M. LaRiviere Assistant Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Civil Engineering Associates Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springf •field/St. Johnsbury ■ (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comL r � � PS Form 3800. Auaust 2006 See Reverse for Instructions Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece ■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Maile. ■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. ■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valves, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. ■ Fo, additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form'3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". ■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, August 2006 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the -card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: & C `� ce,\ A. Sign Agent ❑ Addressee B�ctby ( Printed Name) C. Date of Deli D. Is delivery address different from )terV? s If YES, enter delivery addresabeIWO ❑ No .. I 3. ice Type JU Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7008 0150 0003 6150 5249 (Transfer from service Label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 UNITED STATES PO°'N, SERVICE rst-Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • /- q CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 �Illllfl�ilfll�i{II�Ili11111111�111111f11�i111111i11l1111�1i r-:i - - .. . .-. For delivery information visit our welosite, at www.usps.com,, A USE .. Postage $ �y2 Certified Fee17-71 Return Receipt Fee /) (Endorsement Required) �O9 Hj O ,� Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) T, 7 C �� M Total Postage & Fees Ln b� ie No Sefff T strc_I P o, 3 5----- ----------------------------------------- Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt ft d00Z eunr'0090 w,od Sd ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece ■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail® or Priority Mail®. ■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. ■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. ■ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS® postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted -Delivery". ■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. Internet access to delivery information is not available on mail addressed to APOs and FPOs. ■ Complete items`1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: C rlL �.rre ll WA Eg&Af— A. 0 Receivedauyl(P�tre G e C. AtellOtTkAry Ir.V �� cl D. Is delivery address different fp1W� 1r ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery addreMNY1,0w: ❑ No 3. Servic ype t5oCertified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 7005 3110 0004 4484 7491 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 UNITED STATES POSTAL VICE 1 -- Fir ass Mail I Po:._ je & Fees Paid LISPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • q qc-�3na)GkA GiTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 Ili���.I.I�,i„ifl,....li„if„„i.l,if,�li,�,f,i��i�f>>,If„► I GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@gravelshea.com District Commission #4 Attn.: Peter Keibel, District Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 May 20, 2008 Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly John R. Ponsetto Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret I. Montgomery Robert H. Rushford Andrew D. Manitsky Michelle N. Farkas William A. Mason, IV Matthew B. Byrne Karen K.O'Neill Re: Spear Meadows, Inc., Petition for Partial Findings for Criterion 9(B) Dear Peter: Clarke A. Gravel (1916-2002) Charles T. Shea Heather Briggs Of Coaaeel Norman Williams Timothy M. Eustace Special Counsel Heather Rider Hammond Megan J. Shafritz Ross A. Feldmann As a follow-up to our discussions, I have enclosed an original and three copies the following for the above -referenced petition: 1. Applicant's Cover Sheets with Schedule F and F-1. 2. Petition for Partial Findings under Criterion 9(13) with attached exhibits. 3. List of Adjoiners for both the Applicant's land and the Leduc lands. 4. Check in the amount of $100.00 for the application fee. Thank you for your assistance. Please let me know if you need any further information to process this petition. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:jar Enclosures cc: Parties on Schedule F and F-1. ACT 250 APPLICATION SHORT FORM This package includes: Application Cover Sheets, Schedule A (Fees), Short Form Schedule B (the 10 Criteria), Schedule E (Adjoiner Info.), Schedule F (Certification of Service), School Impact Questionnaire, and Municipal Impact Questionnaire. For detailed instructions, see the accompanying Guide to Applying for an Act 250 Permit-- www.nrb.state.vt.us/lup/publications.htm. For further information, contact the District Coordinator at the appropriate District Office below. The Permit Specialist in each office can also advise applicants about permits from the Agency of Natural Resources and other state agencies which may need to be obtained. Act 250 District Offices Rutland and Bennington Counties District Commissions #1 & 8 440 Asa Bloomer State Office Building Rutland, VT 05701 Tel. 786-5920 Caledonia, Orleans, and Essex Count District Commission #7 1229 Portland Street, Suite 201 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 Tel. 751-0120 Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, and Grand Isle Counties District Commissions #4, 6 & 9 1 1 1 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 Tel. 879-5614 Application Checklist -- Have you included: LJ Signed Application Cover sheets CJ Location Map LJ Site Plan LJ Schedule A - fee information LJ Schedule B - 10 Criteria LJ Schedule E - Adioiner Information0 Washington and Lamoille Counties (and the towns of Williamstown, Washington, and Orange) District Commission #5 5 Perry Street, Suite 60 Barre, VT 05641-4267 Tel. 476-0185 Windham and Windsor Counties Orange County (except towns of Williamstown, Washington, and Orange) District Commissions #2 & 3 100 Mineral Street, Suite 305 Springfield, VT 05156 Tel. 885-8855 LJ Schedule F - Certification of Service LJ Supporting Letters and Documents LJ Building Elevations (if appropriate) LJ Act 250 Fee (payable to "State of Vermont") These forms can be purchased on disk (Microsoft Word format) by calling the Natural Resources Board Office (828- 5441). They are also available at our web site: www.nrb.State.vt.Us/lup/PubIlcatlons.htm Last Revised: February 15, 2008 Please help us provide you and the public with better service through electronic access — and protect the environment too! The Natural Resources Board is working to improve on-line access to Act 250 files for applicants, state agency staff, and the general public. As part of this effort we will be expanding the existing Act 250 database (available at www.anr.state.vt.us/site/cfm/ act250/search.cfm) into a comprehensive, searchable database of all current and past Act 250 applications, as well as an internet-based map which will allow users to geographically locate lands subject to Act 250 permits. We are confident that having this information readily available on-line will not only enable us to provide you with better service, but also save trees, vehicle miles traveled, and postage costs. You can help us in this effort by providing us with a copy of your application in electronic format. We understand that some application materials may not be available as electronic files (letters received from another state agency, for instance), but the more information you can provide electronically, the easier it will be for us to put this information into our expanded on-line database. Generally, we would prefer to receive separate documents (letters, site plans, reports, etc.) in separate electronic files. The application cover sheets, Schedule B, and other supporting schedules can be submitted as one file. Acceptable electronic formats, in order of preference, include Adobe PDF, Microsoft Word, and WordPerfect. Photographs may be submitted in JPEG format. Acceptable electronic media, in order of preference, include compact disc (CD) and digital video disc (DVD). Depending on the size of your electronic files, we may also be able to accept your electronic submission by email. Please check with our district office staff before sending any files by email. If you have questions about the best way to submit electronic files, please contact our district office staff (see contact information on the cover page). Please note that electronic submission is not a requirement — it is a voluntary effort aimed at making the permit process more efficient. Thank you for helping us to provide better service — and protect the environment. Please note that if you choose to submit an electronic copy of the application, you are still required to provide the correct number of paper copies under our application guidelines. This may change in the future as our capability to process electronic applications improves. Vermont Natural Resources Board 8/24/07 Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Regional Offices Regional Enoineers Wastewater Management Div. District Wildlife Biologists District Fisheries Biologist Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Districts #1, 8 & 9 District #1 District #1 (Bennington, Rutland, Addison Cty.) 450 Asa Bloomer State (Windham and Windham Cty.) 100 Mineral Street, Suite 305 Office Building 100 Mineral Street, Suite 305 Springfield, VT 05156 Rutland, VT 05701 Springfield, VT 05156 Tel. 885-8855 Tel. 786-5900 Tel. 885 8855 District #2 Districts 42 & 3 District #2 317 Sanitorium Road, West Wing (Windham and Windsor Cty.) (Bennington and Rutland Cty.) Pittsford, VT 05763 100 Mineral Street, Suite 305 217 Sanitorium Road, West Wing Tel. 483-2172 Springfield, VT 05156 Pittsford, VT 05763 Tel. 885-8855 Tel. 483-2172 District #3 3696 Roxbury Road Districts #4 & 6 District #3 Roxbury, VT 05669 (Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle Cty.) (Orange, Lamoille, Washington Cty.) Tel. 485-7566 111 West Street 5 Perry St., Suite 40 Essex Jet., VT 05452 Barre, VT 05641 District #4 Tel. 879-5656 Tel. 476-0199 111 West Street Essex Jet., VT 05452 Districts #3A and 5 District 44 Tel. 878-1564 (Orange, Lamoille, Washington Cty.) (Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, Grand 5 Perry St., Suite 80 Isle Cty.) District #5 Barre, VT 05641 111 West Street 1229 Portland Street, Suite 201 Tel. 476-0190 Essex Jet., VT 05452 St. Johnsbury, VT Tel. 878-1564 05819 District #7 Tel. 751-0100 (Caledonia, Essex, Orleans Cty.) District #5 (Orleans, Essex, Caledonia 1229 Portland Street, Suite 201 Portland Street, Suite 20011 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 St. St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 Tel. 751-0130 Tel. 751-0100 Countv Foresters. Deot. of Forests. Parks. and Recreation Franklin/Grand Isle Counties Rutland County Addison County 278 S. Main St. 317 Sanitorium Road 68 Catamount Park, Suite C St. Albans, VT 05478-1866 West Wing Middlebury, VT 05753 Tel. 524-6501 Pittsford, VT 05763 Tel. 388-4969 Tel. 483-2730 Lamoille County Bennington County 29 Sunset Dr., Suite 1 Washington County 478 Shaftsbury State Park Road Morrisville, VT 05661-8331 5 Perry St., Suite 20 Shaftsbury, VT 05262 Tel. 888-5733 Barre, VT 05641 Tel. 375-1217 Tel. 476-0172 Orange County Caledonia/Essex Counties 5 Perry St., Suite 20 Windham County 1229 Portland Street Barre, VT 05641 157 Old Gilford Rd. Suite 201 Tel. 476-0173 Brattleboro, VT 05301 St. Johnsbury, VT Tel. 257-7967 05819-2099 Orleans County Tel. 751-0110 338 Highland Ave. Windsor County Newport, VT 05855 212 Holiday Dr., Suite 5 Chittenden County Tel. 334-7325 White River Jet., VT 05001 111 West Street Tel. 296-7630 Essex Jet., VT 05452 Tel. 879-5694 ACT 250 LAND USE PERMIT-- APPLICATION COVER SHEETS NAMES: 1. Applicant(s) Name Spear Meadows, Inc. Address: 1350 Spear Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone 802-863-5822 Legal form: [ ] individual [ ] partnership (attach list of partners) [ ] municipal gov't [ ] state gov't [X] corporation: date formed: 07/29/2004 place formed: South Burlington date registered in Vt. Legal interest in land: [X] ownership in fee simple [ ] lease agreement [ ] contract to purchase [ ] other: 2. Landowner(s) Name: See above Address email: Phone 3. Names of others with significant interest(s) in the property: Name Address Phone Description of Interest (easement, right-of-way, etc.): 4. Contact person: Eric Farrell — Farrell Real Estate Address: P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 email: efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com Phone: 802-861-3000 x 12 FAX: 802-861-3003 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 5. Type: [X] new project; [ ] expansion of project previously exempt from Act 250; [ ] amendment of existing Act 250 permit or permit condition (permit # ) PLEASE NOTE: If you are applying to amend a permit condition which was included to resolve an issue critical to the district commission's or the board's issuance of a prior permit, please contact the District Coordinator to determine whether you need to address the "Stowe Club Highlands" analysis. Also see Act 250 Rule 34(E) (www.nrb.state.vt.us/luD/rules.htm) 6. General description of project (include number and size of buildings; use of buildings; number of lots; length of roads; etc.): TBD — Application seeks partial findings under Criterion 9(B) before final engineering and local approval process for housing project. 7. Construction duration: 5 Years; Duration of Permit Request (if project involves earth extraction or solid waste disposal): N/A LAND: 8. Total acres owned or controlled by applicant and landowner at project site: +/- 26.19 Acres; Acres in additional easements or rights -of -way: N/A; Acres committed to this project: 26.19 Acres. 9. Location: Town: South Burlington Road: Spear Street nearby landmark: "The Overlook" at Spear Street State Plane Coordinates (NAD83): (preferable) or Latitude: 44026126" Longitude: 073011'22" Coordinates Note: Choose a location as close as possible to the area where construction is to occur. 10. Deed(s):Grantee's name as recorded: Spear Meadows, Inc. Book(s): 747 Page(s): 653-656 Date (s): 03/31/2006 Town: South Burlington County: Chittenden OTHER INFORMATION: 11. Check below if you are concurrently applying for any of the following permits from the Agency of Natural Resources: [ ] Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit; [ ] Stormwater Discharge Permit; [ ] Construction General Permit; [ ] Public Water System Permit to Construct; [ ] Conditional Use Determination; [ ] Air Pollution Control Permit; [X] other: N/A Partial Findings 12. Have you received local zoning and/or subdivision approval? [ ] yes [) pending [ ] none needed See above 13. Attach the following unless waived by the District Coordinator: [X] location map (U.S.G.S. map preferred) [ ] Municipal Impact Questionnaire [X] site plan or plot plan (see instructions) [ ] School Impact Questionnaire [ ] building elevation drawings [X] Supporting documents as recommended in (excluding single family homes) Schedule B or as needed [ ] schedule A - fee information [X] Act 250 fee (payable to "State of Vermont") [ ] schedule B - Act 250 information [ ] A copy of any Act 250 master permits applicable [X] schedule E - adjoiner information to this project [X] schedule F - certification of service SIGNATURES: 14. 1 hereby swear that the information provided above or attached to this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Spear M ows, In /,/ Signature of applicant(s) B : ` Gv l Date 7� Please clearly print name(s) Gar N. Rarrell, Duly Authorized Agent 15. 1 hereby certify that I understand that I must not commence construction, demolition, remodeling or commercial use of the pro y as des in Environmental Board Rule 2(C) until 1 have received an Act 250 Land Permi s requ' ed by 10 V.S.A. Sec. 6083(a). Signature of applicant(s) /V ` Date 5G F 16. 1 hereby authorize the processin of thi cation for the above project on land(s) that I own, control, or have significant pr rty in erest i . (attach letter if easier) Signature of landowner(s) Date 5r SP Please clearly print name(s) /L,�ra ✓ G plc (L�%! DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION PACKAGE: DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION PACKAGE: 17. SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL AND FOUR COPIES TO THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR. 18. SUBMIT ONE COPY EACH TO THE MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION, REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION, AND TO ANY ADJOINING MUNICIPALITIES AND PLANNING COMMISSIONS IF THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON A TOWN LINE. SCHEDULE F Certification of Service and Notice of Application You are required by 10 V.S.A. § 6084 to send notice and a copy of your application to the municipality, the municipal and regional planning commission in which the land is located and any adjacent Vermont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary on or before the date of filing your application with the district commission. You are also required to send notice and a copy of your application to the solid waste management district in which the land is located, if the development or subdivision constitutes a facility pursuant to subdivision 6602(10) of Title 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151. You must also post a copy of the notice in the town clerk's office of the town or towns where the land is located. A notice form is attached for your convenience. In order to verify that the statutory parties to the application have received copies of the application and thus avoid delay caused by improper distribution of the application, have a representative of the parties sign this form when they receive the application. You may, in the alternative, send copies of the notice and application by Certified U.S. Mail, UPS/Federal Express, or courier and list the names below. Applicant(s) Name: Spear Meadows, Inc. I, the undersigned, have received a copy of an Act 250 application for the above applicant(s). for the selectmen, aldermen, or trustees date for the municipal planning commission date for the regional planning commission date for an adjacent municipality, if any* for an adjacent planning commission, if any* for an adjacent regional planning commission, if any* for regional solid waste management district, if applicable date date date date I hereby certify that I have forwarded a complete copy of this application to each of the parties entitled to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6084 and the attached Exhibit "F-1" and that I have posted a copy of the notice of application in the town clerk's office(s)___._ Applicant(`s-pgent Signature Date * Attach additional sheets if more than one town is adjacent to the project lands. C Chair, City Council Juli Beth Hinds, Dir. of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 planninq(a burl.com; chafter(&sburl.com; jhindsna sburl.com Chittenden Cty. Reg. P1an.Comm. 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney/ANR 103 S. Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 anr. act250@state.vt.us John Becker Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 j ohn.becker(&state.vt. us Craig Keller Utilities & Perrnits/VTrans One National Life Drive, Drawer 33 Montpelier, VT 05633 craiq.keller(&state.vt.us Louise Waterman, Ed. Coord./Ian Balcom Vt. Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets 116 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2901 louise.waterman@state.vt.us: ian.balcom(&state.vt.us #321341 v1 - Farrell Spear Meadows, Inc. Exhibit FI Exhibit "Fl" Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 jane.lendwUL&state.vt.us j udith.ehrlich(&state.vt.us Scott. dillon(&state.vt.us Jeremy I. Farkas, Esq. Murphy SullivanKronk 275 College Street P.O. Box 4485 Burlington, VT 05406-4485 jfarkas(&mskvt.com William Dailey, III 60 Pinnacle Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 wed03(&comcast.net Michael G. Zahner, Executive Director State of Vermont Natural Resources Board National Life Records Center Bldg. Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-3201 michael. zahner(&state.vt. us Mr. Eric Farrell P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1335 efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com Schedule F - Notice Note To Applicants: This notice must be included with all copies of the application. You must also post, or cause to be posted, a copy of this notice in the town clerk's office of the town or towns wherein the land proposed for subdivision or development lies. Notice of Act 250 Application By application dated: 03/14/2006, (name and address of applicant) Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 filed an application pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6001 et seq. ("Act 250") to: (description of project including road location and Town) Petition for partial findings of fact under Criterion 9(B) A copy of this application may be reviewed at the Town Offices, T of vrl�a 9, Vermont (contact the Town Clerk or Admini tor). / Signature r Date In the event you wish to receive further notice concerning this application, please contact the district office for your area: Environmental Comm. Districts #1 and 8 440 Asa Bloomer State Office Building 4th Floor 88 Merchants Row Rutland, VT 05701 (Tel. 786-5920) Environmental Comm Districts #2 and 3 100 Mineral Street Suite #305 Springfield, VT 05156 (Tel. 885-8855) Environmental Comm Districts #4, 6 and 9 111 West St. Essex Jct., VT 05452 (Tel. 879-5614) Environmental Comm. District #5 5 Perry Street, Suite 60 Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. 476-0185) Environmental Comm. District #7 1229 Portland St. Suite 201 St. Johnsbury, VT 05819 (Tel. 751-0120) I Parcel Number Subject Property 1640-1340 Abutters: 1742-00033 R FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters April 2008 Name and Address Spear Meadows, Inc. c/o Brent Farrell Doubletree Hotel Burlington 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Larkin/Milot Partnership P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. Farrell Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00112 P. Brett Grabowski Jennifer L. Milot 23 Dorey Road South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM and State Agricultural College 85 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda Young David Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. Franzoni Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. Scollins Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 3 FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters April 2008 Parcel Number Name and Address 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 0570-01255 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. Kleh Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01302 R Gary N. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle @ Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. Gilbert Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R George A. Sporzynski Diane I. Muhr 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R St. Clair Group, Inc. 15840 Lakeview Court Crosse Point, MI 48230 -2- Parcel Number 1640-01331 R 1640-01393 R 1640-01404 R FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters April 2008 Name and Address Robert Lavigne Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 William J. Cimmonetti Tanya J. Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Richard E. Tarrant, Dr. Tracy Appleton 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 #320003 v1 - Farrell Subdivision List of Abutters -3- LEDUC WEST PARCEL List of Adjoiners April 2008 Parcel Number Name and Address 0360-00500 Betty Bandel 500 Cheesefactory Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0570-02000 Milot Real Estate c/o MBL 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 0570-02010 Gregory B. Peters Diane P. Peters 1018 Cheesefactory Road Shelburne, VT 05482 0570-01800 Vincent L. Bolduc 252 Autumn Hill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 0360-00530 Hugh J. Harley, III and Donna C. Harley, Trustees of the Donna C. Harley Revocable Trust 530 Cheesefactory Road South Burlington, VT 05403 -1- #320239 v1 - Leduc 46.17 Acres Lot Adjoiners STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT #4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Re: Spear Meadows, Inc. ) Application No. 4C0 c/o Farrell Real Estate ) P.O. Box 1335 ) Burlington, VT 05402-1335 ) APPLICANT'S PETITION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR PARTIAL FINDINGS UNDER CRITERION 9(B)(PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS) NOW COMES the Applicant, Spear Meadows, Inc., by and through its attorneys, Gravel and Shea, and presents the following petition for partial findings under Criterion 9(B) (Primary Agricultural Soils) pursuant to Rule 21 of the_ Environmental Board Rules and 10 V.S.A. § 6086(b). The Applicant previously received sketch plan approval from the City of South Burlington for an original project consisting of 19 single family lots on 26.19 acres of land off of Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont as more particularly shown on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit 1 (the "Project"). The Applicant plans to modify the layout of the Project to increase the density of the Project. However, at this time, the final layout and density has not been finalized and will depend, in part, on the municipal approval process that will follow this proceeding. Before incurring substantial engineering and related expenses for the final design of the Project and preparation of a complete Act 250 application, the Applicant requests the following partial findings under Criterion 9(B): (a) that the Project is located outside of a designated growth center; (b) that the Project lands will include the transfer of development rights ("TDRs") by recorded conveyance from a nearby farm; (c) that the TDR sending lands are classified as "involved lands" that are connected with the Project; and (d) that subject to the conditions SRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 set forth below, the TDR sending lands may be used to satisfy the on site mitigation requirements under 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(2). BACKGROUND The proposed Project is located near the intersection of Spear Street and Swift Street in the City of South Burlington. The Project lands are located within the City's sewer service district and municipal sewer and water lines are available for the Project. The Project lands are bounded on the west by Spear Street and several existing residential homes, on the south by the residential lots and common land areas of the residential development known as Pinnacle at Spear, on the east by existing residential lots, and on the north by an open field owned by the University of Vermont. All of these adjacent lands, including the University's field are zoned SEQ-NR allowing development at 4 units per acre with TDRs. In 2006, the City of South Burlington adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan substantially altered the plan for development within the Southeast Quadrant (the "SEQ"), which is the zoning district where the Project lands are located. Under prior plans, the City sought to protect open space strips along the main roadway corridors. After conducting an extensive open space/ecological study, the City determined that by preserving only the roadway strips, a larger opportunity was being missed to preserve larger cohesive blocks of open space with a higher ecological and agricultural value. The new Comprehensive Plan accomplishes these goals by designating "receiving areas" for TDRs from "sending areas" (i.e., the large blocks of land the City seeks to preserve). According to the Comprehensive Plan: More recently, with the completion of the Open Space Strategy ... there has been a strong interest in building -2- A neighborhoods at higher densities in order to conserve more of the SEQ's priority open space lands ... The SEQ Concept Plan was charged with evaluating whether and how to adjust the "sending" and "receiving" densities within the zoning to provide more incentive for this type of transfer to happen. City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan at 62 (Mar. 9, 2006) (emphasis added). The goal of the new Comprehensive Plan is to "encourage well planned residential development at densities and layouts that protect and preserve large contiguous areas of open space, important natural areas and scenic views." Id. at 9. One of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan is to "[m]aintain opportunities for traditional and emerging forms of agriculture that can be complementary with a growing city ...." Id. at 74 (Objective #6). The Project lands and the surrounding adjacent lands are located within the "SEQ- Neighborhood Residential-NR" Zoning District in the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The NR District is a "receiving" area for TDRs and through that designation, the City has encouraged these lands to be developed as neighborhoods with a higher density. A copy of the SEQ Zoning Map is attached as Exhibit 2 showing the Project lands (light green) as a receiving area and showing the larger blocks of lands designated for preservation (dark green) as sending areas. These sending areas are within the "Natural Resource Protection-NRP" Zoning District on the Zoning Map. Several properties in the NRP District consist of large farms, including farms owned by the Auclair family and the Leduc family. The Applicant is in the process of negotiating an agreement with the Leducs for the purchase of both: (a) TDRs for use in the Project to satisfy the density requirements GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 3 - P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 `■ 3RAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 under the City's zoning regulations; and (b) an agricultural covenant or condition on the sending lands that would satisfy the mitigation requirements under 10 V.S.A. § 6093. STANDARD FOR REVIEW UNDER CRITERION 9(B) "Primary agricultural soils" are defined as follows: Soil map units with the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics that have a potential for growing food, feed, and forage crops, have sufficient moisture and drainage, plant nutrients or responsiveness to fertilizers, few limitations for cultivation or limitations which may be easily overcome, and an average slope that does not exceed 15 percent ... the soils must be of a size and location relative to adjoining land uses, so that those soils will be capable, following removal of any identified limitations, of supporting or contributing an economic or commercial agricultural operation. 10 V.S.A. § 6001(15) (emphasis added). If the soils on the Project site contain primary agricultural soils, "[a] permit will be granted for the development or subdivision of primary agricultural soils only when it is demonstrated by the applicant that ... : (i) the development or subdivision will not significantly interfere with or jeopardize the continuation of agriculture or forestry on adjoining lands or reduce their agricultural or forestry potential; and (ii) except in the case of an application for a project located in a designated growth center, there are no lands other than primary agricultural soils owned or controlled by the applicant which are reasonably suited to the purpose of the development or subdivision; and (iii) except in the case of an application for a project located in a designated growth center, the subdivision or development has been planned to minimize the reduction of agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils through innovative land use design resulting in compact development patterns, so that the remaining primary agricultural soils on the project tract are capable of supporting or contributing to an economic or commercial agricultural operation; and (iv) Suitable mitigation will be provided for any reduction in the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils caused by the development or -4- I GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT D5402-0369 subdivision, in accordance with section 6093 of this title and rules adopted by the land use panel."' 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(9)(B). Where, as here, a project is located outside of a designated growth center, preservation of primary agricultural soils is typically accomplished on site by the imposition of a permit condition for the preservation of agricultural lands on the project tract. Id. at § 6093(a)(2).2 TDR SENDING LANDS ARE "INVOLVED LANDS" THAT MAY BE USED FOR ON SITE MITIGATION The Applicant seeks a ruling that TDR sending lands may be classified as "involved lands" which are connected to the Project tract and, therefore, that the Project may satisfy the on site mitigation requirements of 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(2) by preserving a suitable portion of the TDR sending lands. Act 250 jurisdiction is triggered by an act of "development." In a town with permanent zoning and subdivision regulations, development is defined to include the 1 The Applicant satisfies the applicable requirements of subcriteria (i)-(iii) of Criterion 9(B) and, therefore, should be permitted to mitigate the reduction on the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils. First, the Project satisfies subcriterion (i) since the Applicant will consent to a permit condition requiring a standard "right to farm" covenant in the deed for each residential unit. The covenant will require each owner to acknowledge the continuation of agriculture on adjoining lands and waive the impacts associated with agricultural operations. Second, the Project satisfies subcriterion (ii) since the Applicant does not own or control any other lands suited for this Project. See Affidavit of Gary Farrell, Exhibit 3. Finally, the Applicant satisfies subcriterion (iii) since the Project will be planned with multi- family structures. See In re The Van Sicklen Limited Partnership, Land Use Permit Application #4C1013R-EB, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order at 44 (Mar. 8, 2002) (project with a mix of single-family homes and clustered carriage homes satisfied clustering requirements). To the extent that the Leduc TDR lands are "involved lands" clustering has been satisfied since the development will be limited to the Farrell parcel and the Leduc TDR lands will be left as vacant lands that are available for farming. Because the Applicant satisfies the required provisions of subcriteria (i), (ii) and (iii), the Project may address impacts on listed primary agricultural soils through mitigation. 2 We note that 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(3)(B) provides that in "appropriate circumstances," the district commission may, "approve off -site mitigation or some combination of onsite and off -site mitigation if that action is deemed consistent with the agricultural elements of local and regional plans and the goals of section 4302 of Title 24." In the event the Commission is unable to make the partial findings requested herein for on site mitigation, the Applicant reserves the right to present additional materials under the "appropriate circumstances" test. -5- t construction of improvements on a tract or tracts of land "involving more than 10 acres of land within a radius of five miles of any point of involved land, for commercial or industrial purposes." 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3)(A)(i) (emphasis added). "Involved land" is defined as: The entire tract or tracts of land, within a radius of five miles, upon which the construction of improvements for commercial or industrial purposes will occur, and any other tract, within a radius of five miles, to be used as part of the project or where there is a relationship to the tract or tracts upon which the construction of improvements will occur such that there is a demonstrable likelihood that the impact on the values sought to be protected by Act 250 will be substantially affected by that relationship. Environmental Board Rule 2(C)(5)(a) (emphasis added). Therefore, in order to determine the size of a "project tract" for purposes of Act 250 jurisdiction, the Commission must include both the acreage of the tract or tracts upon which the improvements will be built and the acreage of any involved lands to be used as part of the project. See In re Stokes Communications Corp., 164 Vt. 30, 36, 664 A.2d 712 (1995) ("In determining the amount of land involved for jurisdictional purposes, `the area of the entire tract or tracts of involved land owned or controlled by a person will be used' .. . [and] ... Act 250 jurisdiction turns on whether the amount of involved land exceeds ten acres"). Accordingly, "involved lands" are necessarily a part of the "project tract" which is subject to jurisdiction. Under the provisions of 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(2), mitigation outside of a growth center "shall be on site to preserve primary agricultural soils ...." (emphasis added). The phrase "on site" is not defined in the statute. Therefore, it should be given its common meaning. See State v. Rafuse, 168 Vt. 631, 632, 726 A.2d 18 (1998) ("The ordinary meaning of [statutory] language is presumed to be intended unless it would 3RAVEL AND SHEA 1TTORNEYs AT LAW _ 6 '. O. Box 369 3URLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )3402-0369 manifestly defeat the object of the provisions."). The term "on site" is commonly defined as "carried out or located at the place connected with a particular activity." WEBSTER'S 9TH COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY, 825 (1989) (emphasis added). Because "involved lands" are "connected" with a project for purposes of determining Act 250 jurisdiction, it follows that the "project site" for purposes of on site mitigation should include not only the tract where the construction will occur, but also any tracts of involved lands, such as TDR sending areas, that are connected with the project.3 Under the City of South Burlington TDR program, a transfer of development rights is made by a "Density Reduction Easement," the form of which is attached as Exhibit 4. The Density Reduction Easement is a recorded easement deed that incorporates a reference to a recorded survey plan depicting the "sending parcel" and formally deeds the development rights associated with the sending parcel to the described "receiving parcel." This satisfies the requirements for the transfer of development rights in 24 V.S.A. § 4423(b)(3)-(4) that: (a) a transfer of development rights must be "evidenced by a deed that recites that it is a conveyance;" and (b) the sending area must be "surveyed and suitably monumented." Under the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations, the receipt of TDRs is an integral requirement for the construction of a project and without the receipt of the TDR's, the Project would not be approved at its current density. See South Burlington Land Development Regulations at §§ 9.04, 9.13 (Oct. 24, 2006). As such, the use of the TDR sending lands should be classified as 3 We further note that the statute does not specifically state that mitigation must be located on project lands that are contiguous to the tract where construction will occur. Because this requirement is not set forth in the statute, it may not be imposed by implication. Rather, "it is a well -established rule in this state that in construing land use regulations any uncertainty must be construed in favor of the property owner." In re Vitale, 151 Vt. 580, 584, 563 A.2d 613 (1989) (citation omitted); see also Agency of Natural Resources v. Handy Family Entr's et al., 163 Vt. 476, 481, 660 A.2d 309 (1995) (strict construction of land use regulations and conditions in favor of property owner applies to Act 250). -7- GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 "involved land" within the Project because the TDR lands are "within a radius of five miles, to be used as part of the project or where there is a relationship to the tract or tracts upon which the construction of improvements will occur ...." Environmental Board Rule 2(C)(5)(a). In this respect, the TDR sending lands are an essential property interest connected with the Project, analogous to an access easement or sewage disposal area on neighboring lands. See in re City of Burlington, D.R. #125 at 5 (Mar. 11, 1981) (involved land includes land incident to the use such as leaching fields); In re Guilford Cabins, D.R. #392 at 8 (December 19, 2001) (noncontiguous parcel owned by permittee, within 5-mile radius of junkyard, was involved land because parcel was used for storage and sale of vehicles and salvage materials and was part of the same business); In re Rinkers Communications and Atlantic Cellular Company, D.R. #314 at 9 (May 23, 1996) (access right of way for cell tower added involved land to the project area); In re Wesco, Inc., D.R. #304 at 9-11 (December 7, 1995) (sewer easement on nearby lot included in calculation of acreage for project tract as involved land). Because the TDR sending lands are "involved lands" in the Project, the Applicant respectfully requests a determination that the TDR sending lands in South Burlington's SEQ may be used as "on site" mitigation to offset the Project impacts under Criterion 9(B) subject to the following conditions (to be addressed when a complete application is submitted for the Project): 1. That the owner of the TDR sending parcel (i.e., the Leducs) sign the Act 250 Permit Application as a co -applicant to subject the mitigation area on the TDR sending lands to the terms and conditions of the Act 250 Permit. t A We note that the co -applicant may make a request for limited jurisdiction under the procedures outlined in the Stonybrook case.4 2. That the Applicant submit a survey plan showing the TDR sending area/agricultural mitigation area. 3. That the Applicant review the TDR sending area/mitigation area with the Agency of Agriculture and obtain written confirmation that the proposed mitigation area is acceptable mitigation in terms of size and quality to offset the Project impacts under Criterion 9(B). The above findings would also further the goals of South Burlington's Comprehensive Plan by allowing designated TDR receiving areas to be developed at "higher densities in order to conserve more of the SEQ's priority open space lands." South Burlington Comprehensive Plan at 62. Finally, if the Commission makes the above findings, the Applicant intends to proceed with its use of the TDR sending lands as "on site" mitigation under Criterion 9(B). However, it is possible that the number of TDRs (and corresponding acreage) required by the City for the Applicant's final Project design will be less than the number of acres the Applicant must mitigate for its impact on primary agricultural soils. In that event, the Applicant will request additional findings for flexibility to use a combination of on site mitigation (the TDR sending lands) and off site (payment of the standard mitigation fee). See 10 V.S.A. § 6093(a)(3)(B) ("the district commission may, in 4 In the case of In re Stonybrook Condominium Owners Association, D.R. #385 at 17-18 (May 18, 2001), the Board provided a procedure in appropriate circumstances to define a boundary around a permitted project so that jurisdiction is limited to the project area and not the unrelated remaining lands owned by the applicant or co -applicant. As an example of an appropriate circumstance, the Board cited the scenario of a farmer allowing the installation of telecommunications antennas on a farm silo and indicated that jurisdiction should be limited to a specifically delineated area around the silo and should not attach to the entire farm. GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 9 - P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 03402-0369 I appropriate circumstances, approve off -site mitigation or some combination of onsite and off -site mitigation if that action is deemed consistent with the agricultural elements of local and regional plans and the goals of section 4302 of Title 24"). If this additional step is necessary, the Applicant will present additional materials with the complete application to address these requirements. CONCLUSION In light of the foregoing, the Applicant requests the following partial findings of fact. First, the Project satisfies the necessary subcriteria for mitigation. Second, the Project may mitigate on site through the use of TDR sending lands as "involved lands" subject to Conditions 1-3 set forth above. Dated: Burlington, Vermont May 20, 2008 Robert IT Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street, 7th Floor P. O. Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 (802) 658-0220 :,RAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. O. Box 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT )5402-0369 slrµ µr:owBxR: Eat. K end to Ba:oBna T - L ' L lehem -amI R. AL SkIK 16a5-000aB �iBo-00ne eo-aBno tlYlt acwtwMG As6otlAnc. we ow SPA- r� M�eaia el Span DIVEP lA1 \ eAV VarFl �Lerkh arraare SAV _ - - K KerM FrrN Amlot ParineraNp "Bout. ° - SPEAR MEADOWS UVL1 end Slate - Agl lllVel C ,— �am-az90 VOB SPEAR STREET SOUTH SLFLN 3TON VERMONT W. endo- QN-1 • 0 00 /1 Open SpaOe MA O J. KeOey R `RESTRICTED AREA / ZONING BOUNDARY G and J�F—.1 G FFartH / V NNAOLE \�// Lab GYwlp DRIVE Heekali ]aasm+m C Cm 0" �/o Rand T. G BpeTaNlaW � Al DenokaT aao-ol TenW pao-aa]o laae-ala D. ands. FranaoN � I R. abF L.l,,,. qq a.ndT.clnala.n sT ht,c ,—am m Solt Legend ]p my wwv m umw 9vm al — Ham° cv c.A,4 n aaly a GSC Gaorgla atop am, a Te 11 Parch ebpx An.— —ValPrlma A Armes Impact Ac.• 11 SlalaWtla ].]J x. 0.1] ac. ] 9] Halavatl zN saY kam en RvaOaap EXISTING SOILS U, UAN,lm04 10.)l 2Taaalw.. a p J Ma.Yad ).1]ac =1px. "VaB Verywnas PMM6 x. x. V...d 145E Q� aM.19 x. S16.i6 x. T „mpaama. cANss ng develppad be �`' PLAN eri1 To PN Sol =SZfi.]9 �� 1 Tem PdmeA Spg •Ne.)6Acres= O JULY, 2005 oti�: aave� T"'a-80' C1.0B 02250 I South Burlington Southeast Quadrant Zoning Map Effective April 24. 2006 � to - f i FO 1 : 'S 1 r, i Legend 1:6,000 Parcel Boundary District Municipal Natural Resource Protection - NRP "••\•^•"•• •e•••r^'•^ Neighborhood Residential - NR Neighborhood Residential - Transition - NR-T i0 Village Commercial - VC 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Village Residential - VR lhsclaim The ec—q of information presented is detemrined by itssnnrees. RrmtaandnmissinmmayodA. TheChlttenden County Regional Planning Commission is not responsible farthese. Questions ofon-the-ground location can be resolved by site impectiom and/ar surveys by registered surveyor. This map is not suffident for delineation of features on -the -ground. This map identifies the presence of feat—. and may indicate relationships between features, but is not a replacement for surveyed information or engineering studies. Sanr�: SEq Lunivg: Updated by CCRPC (aoa6)mditectal by Cky Planning office. soo< Parcel bounderea - data provid d by NS. Orthoph"mphy- anal Eartheate Color. AFFIDAVIT I, GARY N. FARRELL, hereby certify, under oath, that I do not own or control any other property within the area of District #4 that could accommodate the Project described in the accompanying Petition under Environmental Board Rue 21. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned herebv executes this Affidavit this as ofthe V-7 day of STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. On this day of , 2008, personally appeared GARY N. FARRELL, and he swore to the truth of the foregoing st tements. `tav aoa RAYMOND J. CERNY. JR. 2�» `" =Notary Public - State of Florida * » - Comm�rrEoresOct28.2008 "" � Commission # DD 366985 ;, <Fa 11 Act 250 Affidavit/321245/6wh0l!:DOGRFIIZ> Before me, Notary Public Notary commission issued in 0ti#endem County /,/L My commission expires: 240 — Draft: January 17, 2008 DENSITY REDUCTION EASEMENT AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TO BENEFITTED PROPERTY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that a Vermont corporation with a place of business in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the consideration of Ten and More ($10.00) Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by a Vermont corporation with a place of business in the , County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these presents does freely, give, grant, sell, convey and confirm unto the said Grantee, and its successors and assigns forever, certain development rights, as set forth below, in property located in the City of South Burlington, more particularly described as follows: A lot of land consisting of acres, more or less, located on the side of Road, so-called, "Property", and being more particularly shown and depicted on a plan entitled, " ", dated , and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Being all of the lands and premises conveyed to Grantor by warranty deed of , dated , and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records,: The Property is subject to and is benefitted by the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations, last amended , Regulations, a copy of which are recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Under said regulations, each acre of the Property has potential for development for non-residential purposes with a maximum building lot coverage of percent (_%), or for residential purposes at a density of one (_) of a dwelling unit. This development potential is referred to herein as "Development Rights". By this Density Reduction Easement, Grantor does hereby convey to Grantee the Development Rights for acres of the Property. Draft: January 17, 2008 Grantor retains the Development Rights for acres of the Property. If, prior to the Property being developed to the maximum density authorized by Grantor's retained Development Rights, the City modifies its Regulations to reduce the development potential of the acres for which Grantor retained Development Rights, then Grantor shall forfeit said Development Rights. Upon such forfeiture, Grantor shall have the right to develop the Property to the extent authorized by the Regulations in effect. In addition to the retained Development Rights discussed above, Grantor retains the right to utilize any increase in the development potential of the acres of the Property attributable to changes in the Regulations that allow development to occur at a density greater than that available under the Regulations. All rights retained by Grantor, as above -described, shall run with the Property and be transferred automatically to any successor fee owner of the Property. If the Regulations are hereafter changed in a way that ascribes development potential to the Property on any basis other than that described above, the City shall implement the terms of this easement by developing a method to equate the above -described development potential to the new development potential. The Development Rights hereby conveyed to Grantee provide potential for development for non-residential purposes of square feet of building lot coverage, or for residential purposes of ( ) dwelling units, as determined under the Regulations. They may be used by Grantee only in connection with development of a lot of land consisting of acres, more or less, located on the side of Road, so-called, "Benefitted Property", and being more particularly shown and depicted on a plan entitled, " ", dated , and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land 'Records. Use of these Development Rights is further subject to an agreemen between the City of South Burlington Development Review Grantee, dated , and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Terms used in this conveyance shall have the meaning they are assigned by the Regulations unless another meaning is clearly indicated. Reference is hereby made to the foregoing deeds, plans and regulations, and the records thereof, and to all documents therein referred to and the records thereof, in aid of this description. 2; 4 Draft: January 17, 2008 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to , Grantee, and its successors and assigns, to its use as provided herein, forever; and the said Grantor, , does for itself, and its successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, it is the sole owner of the rights, and it has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, and that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and seal to be hereunto set this IN THE PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. has caused its name day of , 2008. At ----- --------- _-- ----- this day of , 2008, personally appeared , and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Before me, Notary Public The Bank joins in this conveyance to consent to the grant of this Density Reduction Easement and Transfer of Development Rights and to release the development rights hereby conveyed from the lien of its mortgage from Grantor, dated 3 l Draft: January 17, 2008 and recorded in Volume and Page Burlington Land Records. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and seal to be hereunto set this day of IN THE PRESENCE OF: M STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. of the South has caused its name At this day of , 2008, personally appeared , and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Before me, Notary Public SON08-002.REA 2 1 3 Aft 2 Rail End View ForeRunnerT' Rail — Can Take 3 Times More Impact �' 3/4" Picket — Larger Size Won't Bend Easily Secure Picket Connection — Tamperproof ForeRunnerTm Retainer Invisibly Locks Picket In Place 4. Solid Panel Connection — Heavy Aluminum Bracket Wraps Around Post 2-1 /2" Reinforced Post — Twice as Strong Panel Repair or Replacement Is Easy With the Echelon PIusT" Design The Echelon PIusTM Can Be Installed on a Bias To Follow Grade Changes in the Property Line �jCz>,� �\Ae��e5ws ... �Yw,wa�c✓ Ili��v\z�jevne��t f View looking inside post t--4 ---1-e-A 4e-toit3,, Conqueror 3 or 4 Rail Option The unique Conqueror configuration offers 'the best of both worlds' by combining the striking look of spear topped pick- ets with the safety of a flush top rail. 3 or 4 Rail Option — * Majestic The elegant look of the Majestic design lends to its appeal in a wide variety of applications ranging from neighborhoc residential fencing, to pool enclosures, apartment and condominium access control. 2 Rail Design Monarch The Monarch 2-rail design offers contemporary simplicity with no protruding pickets offering safe and elegance to your pool area. Check your local pool code for complianc prior to ordering. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 15 AUGUST 2006 rumic nearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-63 of Spear Meadows, Inc. for reapproval of a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six two-family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell said the previous permit had lapsed. They have corrected details in the plans and believe they are now in compliance with all city regulations. Mr. Belair said the decision is exactly the same as the originally approved one. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to show where the new road "T's" into Spear Street. Mr. Farrell showed the location and said there will be one lane "in" and two lanes "out." There is a pedestrian crossing over Spear St. Mr. Dinklage questioned whether the size of the shoulder would support a bike path on the east side of Spear St. when the road is redone. He asked if the Rec Path Committee has reviewed this. Mr. Cimonetti, representing the Rec Path Committee, said they have reviewed the project. The Committee wants to build toward a bike/pedestrian lane on the east side of Spear St., similar to the one on the west side. They need to have the developer coordinate with the city on this. There are 4 utility poles in this section of frontage, and the hope is to make sure the poles get pushed to the extreme eastern part of the city's right-of-way so the Public Works Dept. can expand that shoulder. Mr. Farrell noted that 3 poles are being relocated with the widening of the road. The location of the poles can be coordinated with the city. Mr. Dinklage suggested amending the approval motion to add a stipulation that this coordination happen. Mr. Belair said he was concerned with making any changes without warning a completely new hearing. Mr. Farrell made a commitment to work with the Public Works Department and the Rec Path Committee to get what is wanted for a bike/pedestrian path. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-63 of Spear Meadows, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed 4-0. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-62 of Allen Road Land Co., to amend a previously approved 44 unit development. The amendment consists of 1) enlarging the PUD by 5.5 acres, and 2) constructing two 31-unit multi- family dwellings on 5.5 acres, 150 Allen Road: Mr. Llewellyn showed the location of the project. He said they have worked with staff to incorporate all the changes requested. These include: refiguring the parking lots, revising the landscaping plan, and doing a hydrological study. Mr. Llewellyn gave the Board a -2- SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 September 7, 2006 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: DRB Minutes - Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Farrell: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the August 15, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, PL fL Betsy c Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD drb\sub\farrell\spear_meadow fina1.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: August 7, 2006 Application received: July 17, 2006 FILECOPY FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD- 6 63 Agenda #5 Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 Applicants/Owners Owners Eric Farrell Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell, et al. PO Box 1335 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05402 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information T.J. Boyle Associates Tax Parcel 1050-66000-R 301 College Street SEQ District Burlington, VT 05401 ± 26.1 Acres Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board reviewed the initial sketch plans for the proposed project at the meeting on April 20, 2004 (minutes attached). The Master Plan and was granted on May 5, 2005 and the final plat plan was granted on January 17, 2006 (minutes attached). The final plat approval has since expired and so the applicant is here seeking re -approval for the same plan with no changes. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 17, 2006 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Zoning District Require Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 15,539 SF Lot # 7 Max. Density 1.2 units/acre 1.19 units/acre Max. Building Coverage 15% 6.7% Max. Overall Coverage 30% 22% �l Min. Front Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. Max. Building Height 40 ft. <40 ft. zoning compliance SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and comments are available from Jay Nadeau in a letter dated December 21, 2005. 1. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated December 21, 2005. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. City Engineer Bill Szymanski has reviewed the plans and comments are available in a memorandum dated January 12, 2006. 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer as outlined in his memorandum dated January 12, 2006. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 28' wide public street in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 28' and a minimum right-of-way width of 60'. The proposed public street connecting the proposed collector street to the cul-de-sac in the southwest portion of the property will be a local public street. The plans show a 50' wide right-of-way and a 26' pavement width. The plans do not reflect a pavement width reduction to 24 feet when crossing a wetland. The applicant opposes this pavement reduction for engineering reasons. The applicant will have his engineer at the meeting to explain the reasons why. 4. The final plat plan shall be revised to reduce the widths of the pavement on both streets to 24 feet where they cross a wetland. Circulation throughout the proposed development is sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 7th Edition, 19 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 19.19 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic and 12 duplex units are estimated to add 6.24 P.M peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic, for a total of 25.43 vtes during the P.M. peak hour. This CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Fuss and O'Neill Associates, which indicates that the proposed project is estimated to generate 33 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. Fuss and O'Neill is also the traffic engineering firm that produced the Spear Street Corridor Study, so its recommendation should conform to those outlined in the applicant's traffic impact study. A left turn lane is shown on Spear Street at the project's entrance. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadways will cross the wetlands on the northern and southern side of the property. The South Burlington Natural Resource Committee reviewed the plans for the proposed project at their meeting on April 7, 2005 (minutes attached). They recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. there should be no application of pesticides within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 2. there should be no mowing within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 3. the natural vegetation should be retained within the wetlands and their 50' wide buffers; 4. the road widths at the wetland crossings should be permitted at the narrowest width permissible by the Development Review Board; 5. the NRC should review the plans again prior to final approval. The South Burlington Natural Rescource Committee met a second time to discuss this project on January 5, 2006. The committee recommended no additional conditions. 6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Natural Resources Committee as requested at the April 7 2005 and January 5, 2006 meetings. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staff's opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to be located. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and finds them to be acceptable as noted in his letter dated January 13, 2006 (attached). He asks that the applicant abide to the comments in his letter dated October 31, 2003 (attached) 7. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Chief as outlined in his letters dated January 13, 2006 and October 31, 2003. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus, the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, a 10' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property and to the property to the north. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the plans at its meeting on December 1, 2003. They approved the proposed recreation path along the easterly boundary of the project discussed above. In their letter dated December 2, 2003 (attached), they request that the proposed sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street be replaced with a 10' wide recreation path, which is consistent with the Official City Map. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. The applicant submitted an adequately prepared landscaping plan for both the street trees and the site landscaping. In addition, an adequately prepared landscape budget was submitted (attached). The street trees have a value of $38,640 and the site landscaping has a value of $68,605. The CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING applicant does not need to submit the estimated building costs for the two-family buildings for determination of the minimum landscaping requirement at this time as no buildings are being proposed with this application. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and made comments in a memorandum dated January 3, 2006. 9. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist, prior to recording. Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. The lots depicted on the plans are in compliance with this requirement. Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. The plans depict that a portion of lot #19 falls in the Scenic View Protection District D and indicates the height limit to be 36.6 feet above the average pre -construction grade. SEQ Restricted Area Lots #1-3 and #20 of the subject property fall within a Southeast Quadrant "restricted area". Currently, single-family dwellings exist on Lots #1 and #20 (the house on lot #1 is proposed to be demolished). However, Lots # 2 and #3 are undeveloped. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may allow development activities to occur in the "restricted areas" provided the Development Review Board determines that such development activities are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant, which is outlined in Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant is requesting approval to develop lots #2 and #3 which lie in a "restricted area". It is staff's position that allowing the reconstruction of a house on lot #1 and the development activities CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING proposed for lots #2 & 3 will be in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant. Furthermore, the Land Development Regulations are about to be amended to eliminate the restricted area designation. Street Lights The applicant is proposing street lights along both streets. The fixtures are downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 16 foot poles with 150 watt metal halide lamps. Other The applicant has submitted enhanced 9-1-1 numbers which have been approved by the Enhanced 9-1-1 Coordinator. Willow Tree Lane was the street name approved by the Planning Commission on December 20, 2005, which will serve the multi -family units. The main road through the development will be called Vale Drive. 10. The final plat plans shall be revised to show street names and enhanced 9-1-1 numbers, prior to recording. The project also includes boundary adjustments with two (2) properties to the south. Fencing is proposed around the stormwater management ponds. The details of this fencing shall be submitted prior to recording the final plat plan. This fence should be similar to the fencing used at the Heatherfields project on Dorset Street. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-63, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document. Respectfully submitted, AA/A / � P11'4t�7171� yvaaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 concerned with a shift from a family -oriented use to an safter-hours. use. Mr. Kupferman suggested landscaping along the property line between the Jarvis and Bensen properties. Mr. Jarvis also said his building is completely insulated. Ms. Espinola of Dunkin Donuts asked that their part of the application be considered. They are requesting the addition from 2100 to 2408 sq. ft. Mr. Dinklage noted that the front yard landscaping is part of both applications. Ms. Espinola said they have to have their work done by 31 August because they are having trouble with the head office. A poll of members showed no issues with the Dunkin Donuts expansion. An audience members raised the issue of the safety of pedestrians crossing Williston Road and also the impact of the proposed use on JC Park. Mr. Belair noted he had received a call for another resident who didnt feel this use fit into the area. He explained that this is a permitted use. Mr. Boucher suggested waiving the bike rack requirement as this is a night use. Mr. Boucher then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-18 and final plat application #SD-04-19 and site plan application SP-04-15 until 4 May 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch plan application #CU-04-20 of Eric Farrell for a planned unit development consisting of 19 single family lots and six two-family dwellings on 25.93 acres, 1302 and 1350 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell reviewed changes made from the previous presentation. He noted they have reduced the number of single family lots to 19. The cul de sac now has 6 duplexes (12 condo units). Mr. Farrell also showed the general layout and stressed that these are not actual footprints. With regard to the issue of connecting to Vale Drive, Mr. Farrell said they agree it needs to be connected and are showing the connection. He also showed pedestrian crossing to get to bike paths. The bike path will connect from Vale Drive all the way to Spear St. There is a possibility of a left turn lane at the entrance. -4- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 The street widths will be reviewed with the Superintendent as some are a little narrower. Mr. Bolton suggested a fenced area along with wetland setback. Mr. Belair noted that lots 2 and 3 are in the restricted zone. The Board was still OK with this. Mr. Bolton questioned the possibility of creating a physical impediment so this doesn*t become a cut through.. Mr. Farrell didn*t think this made a lot of sense. Ms. Quimby suggested speed bumps or other traffic calming. Mr. Belair said the applicant can work with Public Works on this. Mr. Farrell felt traffic calming would be more effective. Mr. Kleh, an abutter, noted that snow plows have all kinds of trouble with cul de sacs and the city is forced to come back with smaller trucks. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will follow the advice of the Street Superintendent and City Engineer on this. Mr. Kleh asked if there will really be 65 shade trees as shown. Mr. Farrell said there will. Mr. Kley was concerned that headlights will shine directly at their house. Mr. Farrell said they can have denser landscaping to address this. Mr. Kleh was also concerned with the density of development and specifically its impact of wildlife. David and Linda Young, abutters, were concerned with water pressure in the area. They also felt that since there is a special sewer assessment district in the area, the impact cost should be shared with this proposed development. They also wanted to be sure the town houses were of good quality in keeping with the surrounding houses. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will want to see the elevations of the town houses. Mr. Farrell said the stormwater system will meet the state standard and the city standard, and both are very high. He will also have strict architectural control over the homes that are built, even though he will not be doing the building. Mr. Boucher asked about phasing. Mr. Farrell said they will build all the infrastructure The question of lighting was raised. Mr. Farrell said there will be street lights. They havenat yet done a layout but will submit a plan. Mr. Belair said the City Engineer will review lighting plans. -5- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 Mr. Scollins felt the people at Pinnacle should also be notified of this project. Mr. Farrell said he will do that. Mr. Scollins said he felt there are still some tightly packed lots. He also questioned the compatibility of the duplexes with surrounding homes. Mr. Dietchen noted this property contains one of the last truly open parcels in the city and asked about a view corridor. Mr. Farrell said the can look into this. Ms. Plant was concerned with the condos. She felt the ones on the golf course are very uninteresting and definitely snot Vermont.. Mr. Farrell said they will try for some variation. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-04-03 of Burlington Platform Tennis for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to construct an additional platform tennis court, 12-1/2 East Terrace: and 7. Site Plan Application #SD-04-14 of Burlington Platform Tennis to amend a previously approved plan for 2500 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facilities including a pool, tennis courts, and a paddle ball court. The amendment consists of. 1) adding one paddle ball court, and 2) constructing a 240 sq. ft. warming hut, 12-1/12 East Terrace: Mr. Belair noted this is a repeat of a previous approval and has no changes. He had no issue with the requests. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-04-03 and Site Plan Application #SD- 04-14 of Burlington Platform Tennis subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-04-16 and final jplat application #SD-04-17 of Veve Associates, LLP, to amend a previously approved plan for a 104 unit planned development. The amendment consists of 1) boundary line adjustment to increase the size of the lot by 4100 sq. ft. for a total lot size of 14.795 acres at 435 Dorset St., and 2) constructing two 2-family dwellings on a 37,380 sq. ft. lot at 118 Oakwood Drive: Mr. Marcheseau said they have provided a landscaping plan and building elevations. He committed to building the buildings as shown on the elevations. -6- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Preliminary Plat Application 4SD-05-95 until 7 February. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater Burlington for a planned unit development consisting of a 13,000 sq. ft. house of worship to be built in two phases, phase 1 being 7500 sq. ft. and phase 2 being 6100 sq. ft., 73 Thompson Street: Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to affirm that they will build what they show in the elevations. Mr. Adams said they would with the exception that what is shown as stone will be brick. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to identify a snow storage area out of the buffer. Mr. Adams said they will. Mr. Dinklage asked if the stormwater retention pond is large enough for phase 2. Mr. Adams said it is. The applicant requested a 16% parking waiver. Ms. LaRose noted parking numbers in staff notes are based on the daycare and phase 1. Mr. Belair said he has a concern with approving the addition without seeing it. He had thought the Board would be approve it with full parking for the addition. If not, he felt the addition should not be approved. Mr. Dinklage felt the Board would want to see elevations, location of parking, etc., for phase 2. After some discussion members agreed to amend the motion as follows: 3f. The site plans shall be revised to remove all references to signs and all references to the Phase 2 addition. Ms. LaRose noted that the City Engineer has not yet reviewed the plans but will do so on Thursday. He will probably have comments for the applicant. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater Burlington subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows, LLC, for a planned unit development to subdivide a 26.19 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.305 acre parcel to be developed with six two-family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. Mr. Farrell showed the location of a new public street and cul de sac. There will be 3 parcels of land, the 2 single family homes and a lot with the new units. Mr. Farrell also showed a connection to Vale Drive. He noted that the City Manager suggests keeping the cul de sac as a traffic calming measure, but Mr. Farrell said they don't own the land to -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 make that work. He felt they could do something else for traffic calming. Mr. Dinklage suggested an island to divide the 2 lanes. He also suggested further discussion with the Public Works people to build in traffic mitigation on the new part of Vale Drive or in the reconstruction of the cul de sac. Mr. Farrell noted the existing house has an access to the cul de sac and there wouldn't be any access to that house from one direction. Mr. Scollins suggested that a 3-way stop at the first intersection would serve the purpose. Mr. Dinklage said that would have to go through the City Council. Mr. Kupferman asked if the road would be built in the first phase. Mr. Farrell said they would build it through. They could sell lots when the road is passable though not necessarily finished. They will also widen Spear St. on the east side. No private property is involved in this. There will be two lanes coming out of the project, one going in. At the request of the neighbor across the street, they designed a raised berm to keep lights from cars from hitting the house. Mr. Hubbard, agent for the property owner across the street, suggested this could be a condition of the approval. Mr. Farrell noted they also did some screening of other homes with a cedar hedge. Mr. Kleh asked if there will be room left for the bike path. Mr. Farrell said there would. Mr. Dinklage asked how existing vegetation will be protected. Mr. Bresee of the Rec Path Committee, said there were two issues: a. Would the bike path interfere with the tree line? The answer was no. b. With new trees near the path, will they "lift" the path? Mr. Farrell said there is a 7-foot strip which should be OK. Mr. Farrell didn't feel neckdowns at crossings would meaningfully protect the wetlands. They would also make utility installation difficult. Mr. Vock said gas, electric, etc., need to maintain certain "isolations." Mr. Belair said it is such a short distance he wouldn't push for it. Mr Belair noted a section of the sewer line that doesn't comply with the ordinance. He said he spoke with the engineer today and he would explain the issue to the City Engineer. There is a stipulation to cover this. Mr. Vock said he talked with Bruce Hoar who is comfortable with it. Mr. Dinklage said there would have to be an easement with copies to the city. Mr. Scollins said he is concerned that the proposed density is not compatible with what is currently existing. He also noted there is a Master Plan for a north -south roadway to go into Swift Street, not Spear St. as this proposes. He felt it would make sense to postpone this development until an access to Swift is available. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 Mr Scollins also noted that this land is contiguous with land that is farmed by UVM. He said he tried to buy the land and turn it over to UVM. He was concerned that there has been no exploration of the idea of turning the land over to the University in some way. Mr. Tarrant asked for plantings between the town house lot and the property he and his wife recently bought. Mr. Farrell showed where general plantings would be and noted there would be additional plantings with the building of each lot. The motion was amended to add the following stipulation: In the process of reconstructing the cul de sac at the end of the current Vale Drive, the applicant shall construct traffic calming measures acceptable to the South Burlington Public Works Director and the South Burlington Fire Department. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Final plat Application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Clerk Date -5- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 21, 2006 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Farrell: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on August 15, 2006 (effective 8/15/06). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be recorded by 2/9/07) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDo ough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7005 3110 0004 4484 7491 l ) SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 August 21, 20o6 John Collins Collins McMahon & Harris PO Box 1623 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Collins: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, 1. rl Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department SOUTh AURLINGTON PLANNING & :6�NING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 August 21, 2006 Phil Shand 245 Scenic Hill Road Charlestown, NH 03603 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Shand: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. cerely, oci�V4 Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 August 21, 2006 Bill Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Cimonetti: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A 4471(c). HEARING DATE:O)l b + 5 NAME ML111 1�Il� enno�c� ---��-����-�� C(S K&rvv sd� Root- rKVJCI.I OF INTEREST S_ �� c{ �2 0 d't 1 J ISV9-� 9s I I a �. �s� 1�i 1J�(v►•� ?� .. � n I W �i�G� C�� I,� 1�r. k 5CRoKho�sF �cfYG(�a�M✓) xf4AI o/V Cloe-r12vp- 'Fa-(2-AAVi i 0 N AA � ZLO Cdll�. Si. 13J� .,l �� 0 � USG Sly - 0 4 S / '. / / h .f f _' L i • iw B �v �� PA V('".--�j a3 Icc S TpTY S p -G CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve person or body every p y appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE. NAME MAII Mr. nnnr.?i=cc oo� ir!..T — -� r lWoL .i I Or IIV I CKtJ LAnAbS�Co GP.� L�-F T d I 6W n to l mil. w(2 tL vL f j L4A u G e L A e v el ( ti C-(k (J-c t �e,j 2d- C ,,j Ce,.-- mr,k& aa,�mmt/ �Mtk.UVl4�vl Y/(/di �l lnc. 40D 5 . 5vrk s� lb Z-ee, % It�eery4.�' y. 3;" 4C c� %�v� � Ca v� ®RTt \s, �R CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: // S p (p NAME MAII IN[, AnnDcec - -•—•• -- ��-�����•� SLJ�VV"-P rrwJtl. I uF- N 1 KEST z Sc— &,,, 6 ►( ��1 } Av-v e/�,sm Q fax <i(a ��� CITY OF SOUTH BUR.LINGTON 1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4to6 C— I _ July 26, 2006 Gary Farrell Doubletree Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions Sincerely, '"bct Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BUR,LINGT6,-4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 July 26, 2006 Eric Farrell Farrell R.E. PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that"Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, P Betsy McDonoug Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Larkin/Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 7fDCN Betsy McDono gh Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO.,A DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 3uly 26, 2006 Robert & Marjorie Skiff 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 11'�&lk�, T". Betsy og Planning & Zoning Assistant FW10111 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 UVM Campus Planning 109 S. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, cl MA--) Betsy McDoqD0 nough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO,.4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDo ugh Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Douglas & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. *.ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO.. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Michael & Mary Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mc nough Planning & Zoning Assist Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Margareta Dencker 1430 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 0 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 6TY OF SOUTH BURLINGT6.1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy ono gh Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Thomas & Louise Kleh 219 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that"Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, c1 c� h Bettyonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. .�ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO.. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy c"ough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 3*'�J Betsy McDon ugh Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOo d DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO.,d DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, \\ __ E� 0(-� �Y, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, C Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTG.,i DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Richard & Tracy Tarrant 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, "CgT�? Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 j CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 July 26, 2006 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, �5� "') Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMON7r 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 10, 2006 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1335 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Farrell: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Page 1 of 2 Ray Belair From: Elizabeth Miller [emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:06 AM To: Ray Belair Subject: Spear Meadows Project Ray, Good Morning! Does the email below from Rick Hubbard (St. Clair Group) satisfy their sign off of our landscaping plans? Liz From: rick@rickhubbard.org [mailto:rick@rickhubbard.org] Sent: Wednesday, 3uly 26, 2006 7:25 PM To: Elizabeth Miller Subject: Reply from Rick Hubbard RE: Spear Meadows Project Hello Elizabeth, Greetings from Geneva where I'm 3 weeks and 1000 kilometers bicycling and 100 kilometers hiking into a bicycling/hiking trip in the European alps. I won't be returning untill September 1st. The plans for screening at 1317 Spear Street are fine and acceptable, both to me and on behalf of the St. Clair Group Inc. Since I'm here until September 1 st and don't have access to my regular e-mail and other contact info, would you please treat this e-mail as a substitute letter and forward it to Ray since I don't have his contact info. If this isn't good enough, would you be kind enough to draft an acceptable letter to this effect in Microsoft Word format and forward it to me by e-mail for me to sign and send to whatever specific address is required. Thanks, Rick ------- Original Message ------- From : Elizabeth Miller[mailto:emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com] Sent: 7/20/2006 10:21:00 AM To : rick@rickhubbard.org Cc: Subject : RE: Spear Meadows Project Hi Rick, 7/27/2006 Page 2 of 2 I'm emailing you in regards to the Spear Meadows Project that Eric Farrell is working on for his brother Gary. As a part of our conditions for Final Plat approval, Ray Belair at the City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning office needs a letter from the St. Clair Group saying our landscaping plans show screening planning as mutually agreed upon. Eric thought you had a copy of the latest plans but it you don't, I can mail/email you a copy so you can see that it conforms to the agreement between Spear Meadows, LLC and St. Clair Group, Inc. If you already have the plans, would you please send a letter to Ray and a copy to me at the PO Box below? Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to email or call me. Thank you, Liz Elizabeth M. Miller Development Director / Realtor, Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, VT 05402 P 802.658.7400 x14 C 802.343.9242 F 802.860.3594 _emiller&farrellreales tatevt. com 7/27/2006 j Permit Number SD --a -0 - — CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as,shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) ��ee nttn—CJV(J I (,R� 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) � U-1 k(xC 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) q—y (Iflahcd 1 isf 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) no r ra e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) nQ (� 6LE1 F f) Number of emploes & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees)�e� g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? no b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: C i I i & (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing _square feet % Proposed �') I L square feet_ % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing _square feet( % 2 Proposed _ n � C_— square feet _ I % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 0 k E 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS —please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (1 I " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as o this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge,/ 'v V- - SIGN Z RE F PROPPkTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 11i"716b I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete bts'i q*T )�Mcw�y -711-7)nL Director PlatniWg & Zontgpr Designee Date 4 OWNER OF RECORD Parcel A -1302 Spear Street - Gary N. Farrell Doubletree Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 802-660-7526 Parcel B -1340 Spear Street - Parcel C -1350 Spear Street - Spear Meadows, Inc. Gary Farrell 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-5822 LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED Parcel A - Vol. 677 Pages 402 Parcel B - Vol. 747 Pages 653-656 Parcel C - Vol.142 Pages 45-47 CONTACT PERSON Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Eric Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com 658-7400 x25 860-3594 (fax) TAX PARCEL ID# Parcel A -1640 - 01302 R Parcel B -1640 -1340 Parcel C -1640 - 01350 R Liz Miller emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com 658-7400 x14 860-3594 (fax) FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters September 3, 2003 Parcel Number Name & Address 1742-00033 R Larkin / Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00089 R Robert A. & Marjorie N. Skiff 89 Springhouse Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. & Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 0570-01225 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. & Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 r, J 1640-01302 R Gary N. Farrell (1302 Spear Street) Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle @ Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. & Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01331 R Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01393 R William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01404 R Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 FARRELL REAL ESTATE CO. „r P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 �� A Memo To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell Date: 7/ 14/ 2006 Re: Spear Meadows Subdivision Enclosed please find an application for "Final Plat" review of the above referenced project by the Development Review Board. The Application merely represents a renewal of #SD-05-96. There have been no changes to the previously approved plans and all plans are in compliance with the requirements of the Decision dated January 17, 2006. An Application Fee in the amount of $ 510.00 is enclosed. Please schedule us before the DRB at its August 15th meeting. Enclosures Page 1 of 1 Betsy McDonough From: Betsy McDonough (emcdonough@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:04 PM To: 'Elizabeth Miller' Subject: Staff Comments - Spear Meadows Hi Liz — Attached is the agenda and comments for Spear Meadows. I'm sending a hard copy to Eric via snail mail. Have a good weekend! Betsy Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 8/11/2006 Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Spear Meadows Spear Street August 10, 2006 1. Individual sewage pumping stations serving lots 1 through 0 shall be privately maintained by owners. The sewage force main serving these lots shall also be private. 2. Downstream sewer mains must be checked for capacity to serve this development. 3. Sewer services shall be constructed perpendicular to the main. 4. Sewer serving lots 16, 17, & 18 should be put in Vale Drive for quick access and maintenance. 5. Plans shall include street lights. 6. Trees must be planted at least 5 feet from water mains, sewer mains, and sewer force mains. Plans L-3, L-4, & L-5 show street trees planted on top the water mains. Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Spear Meadows Spear Street 1/12/o6 1. Cedar hedge along Spear Street at lot 20 shall be moved after lot is regraded and before Spear Street entrance is constructed. 2. Down stream sewer mains must be checked for capacity to handle the flow from this development. 3. The existing water and sewer services to lot 20 shall be shown on the plans. 4. Street R.O.W. concrete monuments shall be shown on the plans. 5. Curbs at driveways shall be depressed with a 1 1/2 inch reveal. 6. Bituminous concrete road pavement shall have a thickness of 4 inches (2 1/2 inch base course, 1 1/2 inch surface course). 7. Lots 1 through 9 should be sewered with a gravity main in center of the street. The set up as shown on the plans is a violation of the City Sewer Ordinance. There should be a pumping station at about sta. 104 serving these 9 lots. This station shall be privately maintained by the homeowners. It shall have provisions in the piping for an emergency pump hook-up. George Dow of the City Wastewater Department shall review the design. SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 August 10, 2006 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Steve Vock PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows Dear Steve: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the ACT 250 Submittal Plans dated 3-14-06 plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below, and refer also to all pertinent comments from previous correspondence on this project. 1. The CWD tapping fee must be paid in full prior to tapping the CWD transmission main. The CWD tapping totals $8,100.00. The connection will be made according to the specifications of the Champlain Water District. 2. Although this project is in the late stage review process, we have identified several points of concern that need to be addressed prior to construction. Please see my page specific comments below: a. C1.2: The proposed valve cluster and nearby hydrant near Station 109+00 should be shown on the Profile view. b. C1.1: The water main profile between Sta. 116+00 and 117+80 is a significant change from the plans reviewed in December 2005. As such we feel there is a potential for air to become a problem at the high point (Sta. 116+05 approximate). Therefore we feel an air release valve and manhole are required at the highpoint on this line. c. CIA: The valve cluster at approximate Sta. 200+05 should be shown on the Profile view. d. C1.6: The valve cluster at approximate Sta. 9+10 should be shown on the profile view. 3. Prior to opening the connection between Spearmeadows and Vale Drive the SBWD will be required to close the main line gate valves at Olivia Drive/Spear Street and Deerfield Drive/Spear Street, as Spear Street is pressure reduced. Prior notice to the SBWD shall be made by the contractor when the connection is complete and all tests have been completed and submitted to the SBWD. 4. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 5. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. E 6. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Ray Belair Cathyann LaRose Plan Reviews: Spear Meadows 08-06 Tm F FEE rf= UNIVERSITY O f. VERMONT CAMPUS PLANNING SERVICES June 21, 2006 Julie Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows Project Dear Julie Beth: We received your request asking that the University grant license agreements to the City of South Burlington for access along the eastern boundary line of UVM property located at the corner of Swift and Spear Streets to accommodate the extension of a municipal water line and recreation path from the Spear Meadows project to Swift Street. I have asked Mary Gauthier in my office to work on this project. The license agreements will be modeled on existing license agreements that the University has granted to the City of South Burlington for drainage and recreation paths. Sincerely, Linda Seavey, Director cc: Mary Gauthier june2l.doc 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405-0016 Telephone (802) 656-3208, Fax (802) 656-8895 Equal Opportunity % Affirmative fiction Employer t J I_ I I ' I � I II I I I I / / C1.6 �\ SITE ENGLTEER: I I I I 1 I f 1 �\MEADOWC< I ' DRIVE CIVIL ENGINEERING ASMATES, INC. P.O. BOXI55 5HE'fBUHNE, VT 05482 O PJM F _ I^E I / SAV I 1 ' I RO' WIDE RECREATION PATH i �— C1-�*' / PROJECT: C1.21 rwlD ..—..—..—..—�.—..—..----.. _ ..—,. —..— —..— —.._,.. SPEAR ------_ _J_ ___--- II — — — I — — _ .�� _ I GREEN PACE T. Yd L KM _ _ L Ylrm 6FeEe I I MEADOWS AL 1180 �r n la0021a wTD-m2rs p aras�m e• R and U ✓ kIl t o-ooaRs we a.0 SPEAR STREET - SOUTH BURLINGTON �' see uE - - - _ ` T —= f = { - _ �• m sp� - V LE VERMONT -IVE E�.tENr t_ '�.a�: -�'-r_ I*_ -- -� ------p• -- _ �? %/ 7' _ _ ram -a / '-�; 77 _ _ �-- 1•. , I � I -"® _ I _ _ , i�rtit/Mot''aRiwrallp '\�', I ;l '�, / � Z�: II, Iy� 40 UVM tud SIa'. — O I ---E J1J. T -------------- SOUTEASi QUADRANT OVERLAY DISTRICT RE•,b STRICTED AREA - 20NING BOUNDARY 1 '*'•' ~�- n -i 26' PAVEMENT V/. > V WAD ,-� iH C1 NEW CORRIDOR HEIGHT R IFS RICTTaN a 38.0 FEET o 1TWG coNTouR I 1•c r ZONING d51PoCF HEIGHT RESTRICTION m 30 FEET PRM M[• P \ ; ` (AVERAGE PRE-CONSTRUCMN GRADE 30.10 FEE» -- SS— GRAVITY SEWER LINE _ V ' ,eB'1 � smwu uxE - — —PAR— FORCE MAIN 1 w. and K mart - M,1041400 I PNnxJa—Bt#Cta --W— WATER NE \�' ,.�` I` ` y \ I I \'\'� g� - `•w] '/p.�7 at Spwr — —OE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC \__ l �, K,daY I �` RESTRICTED AREA sHW*I I ® % — — / El I i I — — UT — UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE [ZONING BOUNDARY"�--- -- G — GAS UNE i \�\ _� aww J. Farrel 1 -`� y-- Lv-PAVEMENT \I — — — —STD STORM DRAMACE UNE I + O GRAVITY SEVER CLEANOUT /Q Farrell ( 16W-01350 I I/�'I WIDTHL�, C.O. I r \ Is�o-a3o21 I ��^-� I _ _ v -- 4 S I ® ® SEWER —HOLE uANHOI£ HYDRANT I � � ! � r � / // / � � I 1 � � -{{{ �`_.`•` _I � � 1 I I ® e seuT-oPP a. ® CATCH BASIN /% ACLE „OVER POLE -I DRIVE r�'-rw.'wv, EDGE of woods I I 1 I I FiaNCatt CoRRaIaY\ te+a-m�' ��` >•�` I10t ` y ? •• � � I DATR c�c® aevEvtoN o/oLMackek 1 //ice 1! 1 11/ J t 16m 13wndlaL I 1Y 1k Danckw y-T / 1 \r � ¢LandGl4a11� � / I I I I I Rand 3Eg I I i j L_]" __ ___Rea-m>34 r-.---T. JlI & "d I I I C1.1 I 1 J�1 ,, - � I � � /' � � 12/e/0.5 SAV HNSUaM AL PLAN InAL -f y I y MASTER I II SITE PLAN I ! x�V-m.es ! asre DRA,IINc u„nm NOV, 2004 clo r / 02250 Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Notice of Issuance of Conditional Use Determination # 2004-489 Please be notified, as per Section 8.4 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, that the request for a Conditional Use Determination received from Eric Farrell for the construction of two access road crossings to serve a 19 lot residential subdivision which will impact 3,864 square feet of Class Two wetland and 21,298 square feet of the buffer zone was issued on this 6t" day of June 2006. It was found by the Agency of Natural Resources that this conditional use will not result in any undue, adverse effects to the protected functions of the significant wetland off Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Complete copies of the decision can be obtained by calling the Water Quality Division at 802- 241-3770 or writing to the address below. Any person with an interest in this matter can appeal this decision pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal and the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the State of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permits involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.verrnontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. 802-828-1660). Erin Haney Wetlands Ecologist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 10 North Building 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408 cc: Distribution list Mailed — 6/6/06 CIVIL ENGINEERING A SSOCIA7ES, 1 N C4 928 Falls Road Phone: 802-985-2323 P.O. Box 485 Fax: 802-985-2271 Shelburne, VT 05482 E-Mail: tcowan@cea-vt.com LETTER OF TRANSAMTAL Date: June 6, 2006 To: Planning & Zoning Dept. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 From: Tim Cowan Project(s): Spear Meadows Subdivision CEA Project 02250 Description: 1 recordable mylar: "Final Plat of Subdivision — Spear Meadows'; dated February 28, 2006 Message: Please process for filing at the soonest practical time. Please call me (Extension 316) or email tcowanna,cea-vt.com if you have any comments or questions. F CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106. FAX (802) 846-4101. Ms. Linda Seavey, Director Campus Planning Services University of Vermont log So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405-0016 Re: Spear Meadows Project Dear Linda, On behalf of the City of South Burlington, I am writing to formally request that the University grant access along the eastern boundary line of its property, located at the southeast corner of Swift and Spear Streets, to accommodate the extension of a municipal water line and recreation path from the Spear Meadows project to Swift Street. Eric Farrell has advised the City that he has been in discussions with you on this matter and that the University is willing to grant such access, at no charge. The area in question is to be thirty feet in width and run along the University's easterly boundary line from its common boundary with the Spear Meadows project to the south side of the Swift Street right-of-way. Although such rights are typically in the form of an easement, we understand the University prefers the use of a license in this instance. The form of the instrument can be worked out by our respective attorneys. Tim Eustace will handle the City's end of this. The Spear Meadows project has been approved by the City and is awaiting the issuance of its Act 250 permit. The landowner plans to break ground this summer, provided all necessary details can be worked out. Your prompt attention to this will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, li Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning cc: Eric Farrell Gilman & Briggs Environmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, Vermont 05641 (802) 479-7480 ,qbenvironmentalLa�earthlink.net 20 April 2006 City Clerk City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington., VT 05403 Subject: Application for Conditional Use Determination, Spear Meadows Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with Section 8.2 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, I am forwarding a copy of the application for Conditional Use Determination (CUD) for impacts from development of the Spear Meadows project off Spear Street in South Burlington. Raod construction for this development will affect 3,864 ft2 of Class Two wetland and 12,026 ft2 of wetland buffer zone, and therefore a CUD is being sought. Please retain this application for review during the public comment period to be established by the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerel , Errol C. ggs ECB/s Encl. T� State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD April 17, 2006 Spear Meadows, LLC c/o. Brent Farrell 1350 Spear St. So •1 1T_ncnn� AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 Subject WW-4-2587 Spear Meadows combine 3 pre-existing lots and subdivide into 20 lots; Lots 1-18 each for a proposed 4 bedroom single family residence, Lot #20 with an existing single family residence and Lot 19 for proposed 6 duplexes with a total of 36 bedrooms located on Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Sir: I have reviewed the application and technical information submitted for the above referenced project. Unfortunately, there were items that were not included or were insufficient and I was unable to determine if this project meets the minimum standards of the Environmental Protection Rules. Please provide the following information: • 1. Please correct last revision date for Sheets C2.0, C2.1, C3.0 and C3.3. 2. Copy of Permit to Construct from the Water Supply Division. 3. 'Site plan needs to show building footprints and water/sewer service lines for all existing and proposed residential structures. Please respond within thirty, (30) days from the date of this letter. Re -submittals that are incomplete, or made after thirty days may result in the denial of the project. Once I receive the information requested, I will continue my review of the project. If you have any questions as to what is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, ALl'o-cw kil Dolores M. LaRiviere Assistant Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Civil Engineering Associates AGENCY OF NATUR �ESOURCES (ANR) AND NATURAI-'1ESOURCES BOARD ` http://www.anr.s, e.vt.us/dec/ead/pa/index.htrn / nrb.state.vt.us/ PROJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TOTAL # OF DEC PERMITS: PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW: RESPONSE DATE: PENDING APPLICATION #:'t - -4- DISTRICT: TOWN: S'd�L1-� &,ILnp+� PIN u�JO�,- 0-0,31, OWNER OF PROJECT SITE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: (Name) (Name) (Address) J 350 Te&,r (Address) (Town) (State) (Zip) 6')51Lla (Town) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) 1W6a--6'&$- 44UD (Telephone) Project Name: o�S Based on a written or oral request or information provided by Jody— received on 7 • (�, �64, , a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts of land of A, ;1 acres, located on S ,4r..r j7 . . The project is generally described as: 3 z�'�s�'`� 10�5 (4,r 'It cco—„-z', ,,k, 18' r-t� '5r f0 C.,.:ki 5F(Z c-n _ is &_ 'Lcw v+nJ 5:- OC� b<,I VA4,VV%aC-44A 'o-A-t- '5"_Vu , Prior permits from this office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ® I hereby request a jurisdictional opinion from the District Coordin r s n ' trict Coordinator regarding the jurisdiction of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) over the project described above. ❑ La do Agent Permit Specialist ❑ Other Person 1. ACT 250: THIS IS A JURISDICTIONAL OPINION BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AND A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE ANR PERMIT SPECIALIST, THE LAN DOWN E RIAGENT, OR OTHER PERSON. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME MAY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V. S.A. Chapter 2201. (#47) ** Project: ❑Commercial Residential 1771 Municipal Has the landowner subdivide before? ❑ Yes ❑ No When/where: # of lots: AN ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED: ❑ No Copies sent to Statutory Parties: ❑ Yes No BASIS FOR DECISION: �.. 1„)� f^"��"a�'C.c\ ^'• +���", i � 1 .� ..,r.�y Cam, �� �� h_ \\ SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRESS: District #±J_ Environmental Commission District Coordinator Te phone: 111 West St. Essex Jet. Vt. 05452 /N W^STEWAT€R MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: F `RIM117'APPROVAL REQUIRED?,X Yes ❑ No Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit (#1 & #2)** ❑ Notice of Permit Requirements (deferral language ) (#2) ❑ Floor Drains (#1.2) ❑ Campgrounds (#3) ' §, Extension of sewer lines (#5) REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: �%)D(04<S �- ev")1'- t -�xia. SIGNATURE: ATE: ADDRESS: Dept. of Environmental Conservation �Environme I i ance Division, Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Telephone: 802-879-5676 Wastewater Management Division, Telephone: 802-879-5656 OVER »»»»»»» **NOTE: NUMBERS IN PARENTHESES (#) REFER TO PERMIT INFORMATION SHEETS IN THE VERMONT PERMIT HANDBOOK http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/permit hb/index.htm 1 i THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON-BINDR11 DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PER,. S WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR -1 COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS INDICATED BELOW. 3. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (802-41-3822) Contact: ❑ Discharge Permits: pretreatment; industrial, municipal (#7_1, 7_2, & 8) ❑ Indirect Discharge Permits (#9 & 9_1) ❑ Residuals Management (#10) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, ANR (888-520-4879) Contact: ❑ Construction/modification of source (#14) ❑ Open Burning (#18) ❑ Wood Chip Burners (>90 HP) (#14) ❑ Furnace Boiler Conversion/Installation (#14) ❑ Industrial Process Air Emissions (#14) ❑ Diesel Engines (>450 bHP) (#14) S" WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) (800-823-6500 in VT) Contact: XNew Hydrants (#22) J�L>500' waterline construction (#22) ❑ Community Water System (CWS) ❑ Bottled Water (#20) ❑ Operating permit (#21) ❑ Transient Non -Community water system (TNC) (#21) ❑ Capacity Review for Non -transient non -community water systems (NTNC) (#21 ) 0' WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR STORMWATER PERMITS (Hotline 802-241-4320) (#6 — 6.5) Contact: Contact: Stephanie Lanphear 802-241-4320 ❑ Flood Plains (241-3759) ❑ Ponds (#32.1) Construction General Permits >1AC of disturbance (#6.1) 241-3779 ❑ Shoreland Encroachment (241-3777) Steve Hanna (#28) Stormwater from new development or redevelopment sites #( 6.2 & 6_3) 0. Wetlands (241-3770) (#29) Cr J, Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) industrial activities w/ SIC codes (#6.4) Stream Alteration / Sit n 4 Water Qualit cation / Stream Crossing Structures (751-0129 / 879-564/ 786-5906 (#27 & 32) tnra5 $r�l 7. WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: C1 r; l_l f. 140A_1__ ❑ Hazardous Waste Handler site ID (241-3888) (#36) ❑ Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) (#33) ❑ Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities drop off (241-3444) (#37,39,40) :,Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) (#41 & 44) ❑ Composting Facilities (241-3444) (#43) ❑ Waste oil burning (241-3888) ❑ Waste transporter permit (#35) jo Demolition waste 241-3477 Used septic system components/stone (#41) 8. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR Contact: ❑ Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.) (241-3451) (#45) ❑ State -funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades and Pollution Control Systems (241-3750) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION & MERCURY DISPOSAL HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) (#46) Contact: SMALL BUSINESS & MUNICIPAL COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE (1-800-974-9559) Contact: Judy Mirro/John Daly RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) Contact: 10) FISH & WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT (802-241-3700) Contact : ongame & Natural Heritage Program (Threatened & Endangered Species) (#47.4) ❑ Stream Obstruction Approval #( 47.5) 11. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or Dist. Off. 879-2300 Contact: ❑ Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, accessibility (Americans with Disabilities Act) (#49, 50, 50.1, 50.2) ❑ Storage of flammable liquids, explosives ❑ LP Gas Storage ❑ Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers (#50.2) ❑ Boilers and pressure vessels #( 50.3) 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: ❑ Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors (#51, -91.1, 52, 53, 53.1) ❑ Program for asbestos control & lead certification (#54, 55, 55.1) ❑ Children's camps ❑Hot Tub Installation & Inspection — Commercial (#51.1) 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: ❑ Child care facilities (1-800-649-2642 or 802-241-2159) (#57) ❑ Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) (#59) ❑ Nursing Homes (241-2345) (#59) ❑ Assisted Living and Therapeutic Community Residences (241-2345) (#59) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) (#66) ❑ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) (#63) ❑ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) (#61) ❑ Construction within state highway right-of-way (Utilities, Grading, etc.) (828-2653) (#66) Contact: ❑ Junkyards(828-2053)(#62) ❑ Railroad crossings (828-2710) (#64) ❑ Airports and landing strips (828-2833) (#65) ❑ Motor vehicle dealer license (828-2067) (#68) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (800-675-9873) Contact: ❑ Use/sale of Pesticides (828-3478) (#72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78) ❑Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) (#81) ❑ Milk Processing Facilities (828-3428) (#83, 811, 85, 87) ❑ Animal shelters/pet merchant/livestock dealers (828-2421) (#89, 89.1) ❑ Golf Courses (828-3478) (#71) ❑ Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2436) ##888) ❑ Green Houses/Nurseries (828-3481) (#79) ❑ Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Poultry/Frozen Dessert/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) (#75.1, 80, Q VERMONT ENERGY CODE ASSSISTANCE CENTER TOLL FREE 888-373-2255 ^VT Building Energy Standards (#47.2) 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3211) ❑ Historic Buildings (#47.1 & 101) ❑ Archeological Sites (#47.1 & 101) 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) ❑ Liquor Licenses (#90) ❑ General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2386) ❑ Business Registration (#90.1) [:1 Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) (#90.2) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551 & 828-5787) ❑ Income & business taxes (sales, meals/ rooms, etc) (#91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96) SDEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2070) ❑ Fuel Taxes; Commercial Vehicle (#69-70) LOCAL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 8 Carmichael St., Ste. 205, Essex Jct., VT 05452 (802) 872-2893 (#97, 98, & 99) 24. OTHER: Sections #3424 above have been completed by Permit Specialist Jeff McMahon Dater -q-vk, I may be reached at 802-879-5676 Copies have been mailed to: Revised 2/05 P is CIVIL CEP I�' MEIRERI> it A_SOISOCAAUIE'S. 1! r.6, 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, V'1' 05482 Mrs. Stephanie Monaghan District #4 Coordinator Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Jct., Vermont 05452 May 11, 2006 Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 N-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Re: Spear Meadows, Inc. Land Use Permit Application (#4C1173) - Hearing Recess Order Dear Stephanie: In response to the Spear Meadows Act 250 Application (#4C 1173) Hearing Resource Order for supplemental evidence I offer the following information: 1. The Water Supply Public Water System permit application and the Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit Application were submitted in the middle of March. We are still awaiting the issuance of these permits. (The ww permit cannot be issued until the water supply permit is issued) 2. The Stormwater Discharge permit application has been submitted and we are awaiting the issuance of this permit`. 3. A Construction General Permit from the ANR will come off notice on May 17, 2006. 4. Detailed plans showing the proposed berm and plantings at 1350 Spear Street have been provided by T.J. Boyle and are enclosed with this response. 516. Our calculations indicate that the existing 18" roadway culvert that crosses Spear Street (South of the Swift Street Intersection) is undersized for large storm events, As a result of the stormwater management facilities proposed for the Spear Meadows project, there is essentially no impact with regards to peak discharges across the UVM property or the Spear Street culvert crossing. The water quality should show a significant improvement with regards to sediment loadings. Even though our calculations indicate Mrs. Stephanie Monaghan May 11, 2006 Page 2 that the roadway culvert is undersized the South Burlington Public Works Department reports that this crossing has not been a problem. 7. On the University of Vermont property (west of Spear Street) the existing drainage way (Potash Brook) essentially runs parallel with Swift Street. In the areas with steep gradients, it is evident that erosion has certainly occurred over time. The Spear Meadows Project will essentially have no impact on the present erosion issue as a result of the projects stormwater controls. 8. Proposed language for the restriction covenants for the northern lots adjoining the UVM property is attached. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know. Since , Stephen A. Vock, P.E. enclosures: cc: Eric Farrell Certificate of Service (attached) C:\Documents and Settings\cgahpeau\My DocumentsWonaghan.wpd Language to be included in the Warranty Deeds to Lots 4 5 and 6 Spear Meadows South Burlington, Vermont. The within Lot _ is conveyed subject to the restriction that there shall be no removal or disturbance of landscaping located along the northerly boundary line of the lot described herein, adjacent to lands now owned by the University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, as more particularly delineated on a plan entitled "SPEAR MEADOWS Overall Landscape and Lighting Plan", dated March 29,2005, last revised 10/17/06, and recorded in Volume , Page , Map # of the South Burlington City Land Records (the "Landscape Plan."), which said restriction shall be deemed a covenant running with land. Reference is hereby made to a plat entitled "SPEAR MEADOWS Spear Street South Burlington Vermont FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION", Drawing # 51.1, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated February 28, 2006, and recorded in Volume , Page _ , Map # of the South Burlington City Land Records. G CFL Curnpact Flocxllights rosrslon SU::Ji •,Il.µli Type: COMPACT FLOOD Fixture Options: Approvals: Job: SPEARMFADOWS 94-CFLA3L.P Fixture Catalog number: QFLI 142PLI20 -BL-P --_ Mounting Options: SMIB »,.._ _ _ BLP ., ,,,t:• Date: .. Pege: I of 8 Specifications Housing: orw..•-Pio-e dic a5L low cc.ppel Cul Aumi,nn, it , ctiin ku al slam w4h innpJai ,-ding fins rn dw entire lenoi and .10V mitintirn win thidmcs Dintenelons tali-rxe-e A:icone Rake) be%a. h,uin;f and Nre limp.. CFLN7 O"k, j Let» Frorm; <hc-pick- dN`CJSt. INS' coppri (U.u'�r• Cu) t•01.. 0 all H I lumuxa dh rxcsral w16ng rn,s I W mim,un wall AAn: It an 13'— L., r l'° with Ins ing to-n•al-.r "Infnu-Ls I :4Ir• 1L ^atl CI-tn,.0 Fk r.rc—o"I I Ls4lnc6ka1 slate -'' Ihi kcicar I—q ertd ,y^M'LI aK s—W ,i(I 'rYnl II x•Ar xlti c:H a to the Ices fizmc b"' a me -pick c vamped si l lcme> &4m. Lens Ilk),.'an Halou— Ira",—ures to i,ousing in• mv,,I:nnk-swe'-to5(tit�ryel"e AL-4-0 .:—,,. 0.Aarxix n•�walurr ICI Io + Swivel: *,--t alum,nlm .•,ah InrNml locking Twlh .—uNN t,' aLipr uert in.rnak and 'i NE`i!A IIsF olit1 -ass Iccluat Ur r—i ny. Clear anodiud p—to cI—aw i re+i.kxca 1-c�l;".,,kl«I,r,m,.xn Fasten1e19 V.,:,,1-5tRI ,"," dl ar.4,—.,11M,J .,,],.o,c tisBBLYp. `ixr'uLx Al -ilk• :thnninum ,`plKl t'mr•:,I,Pnis •n4anrd lu Jun—n katl e x�luuy i Socket ALV I ti 1— T 1 it Int—1 I and 1.4:,. I I I I I U ;• 1-4 N01--o Wse I I. hgenl law T ,23-2 d-pht I- 42w I,a13t1.4 4-pin bast` 1 hx+,es. H IL for T' Mien tvnp. w", :rva,Wir n. wan ".I Ilalxk . ,}' '`-"' BsNaet:A''Ir♦�.bical<unt(xx,er,ts,xe lll.tnd CSArecWi—i SIDE with tracts ex"Aing an of d,c woad splice—paament. FRONT Nonnal t w Wirt t Ilan r4ed-3 'f varlmg ti.t w,ol I in r t t'•x r.; l Tut,e Ile I , I ly, p .wr I," f„ ILN r:,•cxl t .urtinx 'a? ao Tor 4. r1L e 1 :as N ti, Re u Hlgh s L t I u' web wrong tuipl^ratures -AI -F. G HP+ and AF for "MI i Iaini modes. For E Ntht120 sL Il I st"p Iratishln x i, �,... - 1—idr•J i.,r lt'S-.rr -it a step--l—, tr nsb-n— ,. is pin,- 1n ml. n, Ftni.b: tit pn I c;lc i1w m,n�Y Ix,Iw-1sr -...dr „-,,r pant LS lull nnn r.II IEIKk11CK. aL uax- a Tiianated Z:ro)niun AIMING RANGE %,f ).GTIna s:,h xnrr-inn roaring: hym,y Iry .^nAralxc rnmg. nand-1 -1.,s..,c Black- 1).+rk B-zc, Lghl Cray..'lalinu„ tiihx m 4yl,ita 4Lgnm cnh-s ara avaibhle. CAUTION: 1 luu:a mum L< lecandM in a _•.dance wid, :,.Ai— I —I+ anti., 4"al.ks irk .,I ,,rd— (aii:,rC 1 do �. n lav,esult in sdiu-5 Fnrv,nal i„jury. ;rwrr4�au. —_- Listings and Ratings UL,:UL 1511A M•••N u x•,y. x,r III; i1 i i CE ISO ryrj I — e aooa ILL UT•.YuSW:•„xn`43WLe�5 90e,.1p5i_ ItCFL Compact Fjcx4ights MM LAGH TM xu: u. • nl.i"I Type: COMPACT FLOOD Job: SEAR MEADOWS Page: 3 of 6 _ �+> Fixture Options r i~•' Ordered Separately from Fixture Barn Doors Lrtrulei .dunlinum. fulk axljusUble dn— ilh Cat. No. (aee right) .mt-41erm,, Wftks. Finis duAly wnrkci ant st;'.I•ed nn Z No optioal a ve a,k% steel ne. Easily atiarb., in pr«d•ilhi :a[m in the lc ,5 name whh slat,icse qN--4 -eus,. Rovidcs beam arul glare ealrrn. xx n CAIJTEON Nit l _. 61 k.r Rnll mil „"xrl«1 li•Ilrra Nn - BOCFLJBL-P Black _ eo-cFLMS-P Nrk ll,. 50CFLJLG-P Lght Cray = BD-CFUPS•P Mlinum}Mr BD-CFLnuH-P whir r ..............................Mh Fixed Hood I Done<1 fud Lurk Au iNnt I nsily jttw 1Lx k, jt eF Iril,ed r'.d(see right) h, in the Irre Iralrat -if, .lainle.s-Aml FY-1e.• No Opboo •>imw slnexli,R k" hhr,, onl N, , ✓ FHCFLID 1 1 1 I . D.,I, _ FH•CFL/DB-P Dzrk Bronze FHCFL/LG-P 1 iehl (iay � till FHCFLlPS� PLlint—Siv.•r , FHI-CT- H-P wbit. Full Shield h nn i .lNi? hick ahnn:n— East ly ow.i,cs to pc -chi led t'A 'J� (see right) h +ley in d,C INK crime \ 4h '1"11t.IPb s7rcly I•'a55. r}pvklA l7 No Optial cxrplew cycled gfor glare pV& CAUTION Do Of Lee 1, 1"-41r115 ` 11CW lea1L< and h1511 - . + cnikal a+drM shies 1. " FSCFLIBL-P Black _. FS•CFUDB-P Dark &a>ie FSCFL20-P Li ht flay -FSCFVPS-P I'Lli.-54— _. FS•CFL/WH•P k4hltc ra••s racy ualrtwOlra;.•=:.ti..Lw's.,::tY cr MRrk,•,�,�,::�:-vcgo.lLL r�aru:w.avu.r•x u^,:�:.X. ;�,-v... _. T. J. Boyle and Associates Gary F—ee landscape archhects • Planning oonsullarns %lb 0.>•ISBi Spear Meadows c —n 1350 Spear Sneet = ►J G Smut Bur•ngton. Vr OS•43 301 college street itburlingttln • vermont • 05401 802e Ewe 3555 www.Qboyle.corn mn rx�ls 1/4" = 1" - 0• Landscape Sign Sketch CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this day of April, 2006, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 HEARING RECESS ORDER #4C1173, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 =ric Farrell =arrell Real Estate 'O Box 1335 3urlington, VT 05402 Steve Vock, PE civil Engineering Associates 'O Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Gary Farrell Spear Meadow, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dan Senecal-Albrecht, Samantha Tilton & Juliana Potter Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 University of Vermont c/o John Collins, Esq. Collins, McMahon & Harris, PLLC 30B Main Street, PO Box 1623 (Burlington, VT 05402-1623 Bill Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Page 2/COS/#4C1173 PARTIES (Con't) The St. Clair Group, Inc. c/o Rick Hubbard, Esq. 1317 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403-7404 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Little, Chair/Gene Richards/Chuck Dunham 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Matt Strassberg 177 Paddy Hill Road Moretown, VT 05660 (Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this A4 day of April, 2006. :1Act2501ADMIN1CS14C1173cs.wpd Wrisfine Commo Natural Resources Board Technician 879-5660 -- INTERSECTION ENTRY SIGN BERM DRIVE OPEN SPACE SECTION B-B' - ROAD -- — ENTRY SIGN ELEVATION C-C' BERM 4 PLANTINGS ALONG SPEAR STREET Boyle .ions R Pia n a iaw o ,a-oe A Ilcant: Eric Farrell r•Wamm os.oa-os R i ���r p i pi o�aim��-- - o� u.oe -- -- -- pp landscape arcnitacts •planning consUllanis w -as ,� 4'Zt-O6 SPEAR MEADOWS 4 reWlona I66oaE for Flnal Gla, Revbw ,z-oe-0s -- - _ -- _ -- --- S pie, naaanavm -+v- - - _-- --- -- - Burlington, VT 05402 PO Box 1335 301 college street • budington • vermont . osaot eaz •658.3555 hl,p9/www.,i6oyie.wm _ J SECTIONS 1" = 10' Sections &Elevation ►J . South Burlington, VT 05403 301 college street • burlington • vermont • 05401 802. 658.3555 www.tjboyle.com drawn�b date 03.13.06 Z north scale I I I Spear Meadows sheets no: ►✓ Landscape Sign Sketch S — 1 Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL USE DETERMINATION #2004-489 A request for a Conditional Use Determination, required pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Vermont Wetland Rules has been received from Errol Briggs of Gilman & Briggs Environmental, representative for Eric Farrell for the Spear Meadows, Spear Street Project in South Burlington, Vermont. Approval is being requested for the construction of road crossings to serve a 19-lot subdivision. The proposed project will impact 3,864 square feet of wetland and 21,298 square feet of buffer zone. This wetland has been designated as a significant (Class Two) wetland by the Vermont Water Resources Board. Copies of the application are available for review at the Vermont Wetlands Office in Essex Junction, the Town Clerk's Office in South Burlington and the Chittenden Regional Planning Commission office in South Burlington. Conditional Use Determinations may only be approved if it is shown that the proposed conditional use will not have an undue adverse impact on the functions and values of any significant wetlands or their adjacent buffer zones. Any person may file comments in writing on this application through May 17a' with: Erin K. Haney District Wetlands Ecologist Water Quality Division Department of Environmental Conservation 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 k-1 If Erin K. Haney District Wetlands logist Enclosure cc: Distribution List D:\CUD'06\Notice\2004-489-15 day notice.doc �) YY'l�.Qdo� S State of Vermont NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD DISTRICT 4 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION 111 West Street - Essex Junction - Vermont 05452 RE: Spear Meadows, LLC 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Introduction Application #4C1173 Hearing Recess Order 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 (Act 250) On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, the District Commission held a public hearing for the above ferenced application at the Essex Junction District Office of the Agency of ' datural Resources, 111 est Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 13(B), the Commission -essed the hearing pending submittal of additional information by the Applicant as set forth below. Party Status The following persons who attended the hearing have statutory party status pursuant to mental Board Rule 14(A): The Applicants, represented by Eric Farrell, Spear Meadows, Inc.; Steve Vock, P.E., Civil Engineering Associates; Gary Farrell, landowner. The Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, represented by Dan Senecal- Albrecht, Samantha Tilton, and Juliana Potter. The following persons were present at the hearing and requested party status. The ;sion has preliminarily granted or denied party status under the criteria indicated, pursuant to mental Board Rule 14(A): The University of Vermont, represented by John Collins, ESQ., requested party status under the following criteria: l (B) (Waste Disposal) which requires that the proposed Project will meet any applicable health and environmental conservation department regualtions regarding the disposal of wastes, and will not involve the injection of waste materials or any harmful or toxic substances into ground water or wells; 4 (Soil Erosion) which requires that the proposed project will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water so that a dangerous or unhealthy condition may result; 5 (Traffic) which requires that the proposed Project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of highways, waterways, railways, airports, and other means of transportation existing or proposed given that the Project will adhere to the Uniform Standards for Traffic Control for construction in a road; and 8 (Aesthetics) which requires that the proposed Project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. The Chair preliminarily granted party status to the University of Vermont under all requested criteria. Hearing Recess Order #4C1173 Page 2 Bill Cimonetti, 1393 Spear Street, requested party status under the following criteria: 5 (Traffic) which requires that the proposed Project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of highways, waterways, railways, airports, and other means of transportation existing or proposed given that the Project will adhere to the Uniform Standards for Traffic Control for construction in a road; and 8 (Aesthetics) which requires that the proposed Project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. The Chair preliminarily granted party status to Mr. Cimonetti under all requested criteria. The St. Clair Group, Inc., represented by Rick Hubbard, was not present at the hearing. Through a letter from their agent dated April 19, 2006, they requested party status under the following criteria: 5 (Traffic) which requires that the proposed Project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to use of highways, waterways, railways, airports, and other means of transportation existing or proposed given that the Project will adhere to the Uniform Standards for Traffic Control for construction in a road; and 8 (Aesthetics) which requires that the proposed Project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. The Chair preliminarily granted party status to the St. Clair Group, Inc. under all requested criteria. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(2) and EBR 14, the Commission will re-examine its party status decisions prior to the close of the hearing and will state its final party status decisions either in the decision it issues on the case or in a separate memorandum. M. Supplemental Evidence Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 20(A), and with regard to the testimony provided, the osion requires that the Applicant submit the following information, A Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit from the Wastewater Management Division, Agency of Natural Resources. A final Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Water Quality Division, Agency of Natural. Resources. A Construction General Permit from the Water Quality Division, Agency of Natural Resources. A plan (or plans) showing details of the proposed berm to be constructed at 1350 Spear Street. The Commission is interested in the overall dimensions and plantings. Information regarding whether the outflow pipe under Spear Street is undersized, and if so, what impact that will have on the University's property adjoining the project. Information regarding stormwater flows from the Project to the University's adjoining property. Recess Order #4C1173 Information regarding the impact, if any, on Potash Brook where the Brook traverses the University's horticultural farm West of the project. The Applicant has agreed to put restrictive covenants in the deeds for the lots immediately adjacent to the University's property to restrict said lot owners from removing or diminishing the landscape buffer at the North end of said lots. The Applicant has agreed to work cooperatively with the University to reach a mutual agreement on the nature and extent of the landscape buffer. Please provide proposed language for a deed covenant to prevent the removal of landscaping between Lots 4, 5, and 6 and the adjacent University of Vermont parcel. Order The Commission requests the above documentation, including proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, be provided to all parties listed on the attached certificate of service and that four (4) sets of the documentation be submitted to the District Commission Office on or before Friday, May 12, 2006. All filings must be received in the District Commission office no later than 4:30 p.m. on the date scheduled, unless another time is specifically required or authorized. Telefax filings are not permissible, unless specifically requested or authorized by the Commission. The parties will have until Friday, May 19, 2006 to submit any rebuttals. The Commission would appreciate any proposed findings and conclusions to also be submitted in WordPerfect® v8 format on diskette to the District Coordinator. Alternatively, the file can be e-mailed as an attachment to: stephanie.monaghan@state.vt.us. After the above information has been received, the Commission will reconvene the hearing y if there are outstanding questions or if a party has reasonable questions about the additional ►rmation. If the information has not been received within 30 days from the date of this notice, or if hearing is not reconvened, the Commission will set a date for adjournment and issue a final ision based on the existing record following a full deliberation of the issues. If the applicant hes to continue the recess beyond 30 days from the date of this notice it must notify the District nmission in writing on or before the 30th day. Pursuant to EBR 43(A), any party aggrieved by this order may file a motion for interlocutory preliminary) appeal regarding questions of law to the Environmental Court. Such a motion must be lade in accordance with EBR 43(C) and must be filed directly with the Environmental Court within 0 days of the date of this Order. If any party has any questions or wishes to request the hearing be reconvened, please call the Coordinator, Stephanie H. Monaghan at 879-5662. at Essex Junction, Vermont this 26 day of April, 2006. Thomas A. Little, Chair District #4 Environmental Commission 173\4C1173.hro 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this ;tf& day of April, 2006, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 HEARING RECESS ORDER #4C1173, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: PARTIES: Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Steve Vock, PE ,ivil Engineering Associates PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Gary Farrell Spear Meadow, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dan Senecal-Albrecht, Samantha Tilton & Juliana Potter Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 University of Vermont c/o John Collins, Esq. Collins, McMahon & Harris, PLLC 308 Main Street, PO Box 1623 Burlington, VT 05402-1623 Bill Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Page 2/COS/#4C1173 PARTIES (Con't) The St. Clair Group, Inc. c/o Rick Hubbard, Esq. 1317 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403-7404 FOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thomas Little, Chair/Gene Richards/Chuck Dunham 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Matt Strassberg 177 Paddy Hill Road Moretown, VT 05660 Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this a4 day of April, 2006. \Act25MADMUCS\4C1173cs.wpd ris ine Commo Natural Resources Board Technician 879-5660 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: SPEAR MEADOWS, LLC ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4 APPLICATION # 4C 1173 April 17, 2006 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Julia Moore, in the above captioned matter. COMMENTS Criterion 1(G) — Wetlands Erin Haney, District Wetlands Ecologist with the Department of Environmental Conservation, indicates that a Conditional Use Determination (CUD) is required for this project and that she plans to visit the site before the end of the month. Ms. Haney also reports that it will be mid- to late -May before a CUD is likely to be issued for this project. The Agency requests that the District Commission withhold positive findings under this Criterion until such time as the CUD is issued. Criterion 8(A) — Historic Preservation The Division for Historic Preservation (DHP) has reviewed this undertaking for purposes of Criterion 8, 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250). Project review consists of identifying the project's potential impacts to historic buildings, structures, historic districts, historic landscapes and settings, and known or potential archeological resources. The purpose of our review is to provide the Environmental District Commission with the necessary information for them to make a positive finding under the "historic sites" aspect of Criterion 8. The proposed project area is located on the east side of Spear Street and contains an upper arm of Potash Brook, a tributary of Lake Champlain. Application of the DHP's Environmental Predictive Model for Locating Precontact (prehistoric) Archeological Sites resulted in a score of 84 points for the general project area. Subsequently, three specific archeologically sensitive areas were identified during a site visit to the property with Eric Farrell, the applicant, and Steve Vock from Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. on December 9, 2005. All three areas are situated within areas of slightly higher topography adjacent to the stream channel. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. has provided the DHP with a preliminary map showing the sensitive zones and the DHP understands that the applicant is planning to complete a Phase I survey of these areas once weather conditions permit. The DHP recommends that the following conditions be included in any land use permit issued for this project to ensure that the project will not have an undue adverse effect on any historic sites: Application # 4C 1173 April 17, 2006 2 1) The permittee will map the archeologically sensitive areas on the site plan and label them as not -to -be -disturbed archeological buffer zones. Copies of this revised site plan will be submitted to the District Commission and the DHP. 2) Topsoil removal, grading, scraping, cutting, falling, stockpiling, logging or any other type of ground disturbance is prohibited within the buffer zones without written approval of the District Commission and the DHP. 3) Additional archeological study shall be carried out within the buffer zones prior to any ground disturbing activity. All archeological studies must be conducted by a qualified consulting archeologist and should follow the DHP 's Guidelines for Conducting Archeological Studies in Vermont. The permittee's archeological consultant should submit any scope of work to the DHP for review and approval. 4) Any archeological site identified within the project area will not be impacted until any necessary mitigation measures have been carried out. Mitigation may include but is not limited to further site evaluation, data recovery, and redesign of one more proposed project components, or specific conditions that may be imposed during construction. S) Proposed mitigation measures will be discussed with and approved by the DHP prior to implementation, and a copy of all mitigation proposals will be filed with the Commission. All archeological studies will result in one or more final reports, as appropriate, that meet the DHP's Guidelines for Conducting Archeological Studies in Vermont. Copies will be submitted both to the DHP and to the District Commission. 6) In the event that one or more significant sites are identified in areas not to be disturbed by the proposed project, the permittee will draw up and execute covenants protecting the site or sites in perpetuity and enter them in the deed for the property. The covenants shall reference all the above restrictions and copies shall be filed with the District Commission and the DHP. Dated April 17, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By: Juli S. Moore, P. Regulatory Management Division 2) 241-3687 '1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Andrea McKnight, Program Technician for the Agency of Natural Resources Division of Regulatory Management and Act 250 Review, sent a copy of the foregoing Comments and Entry of Appearance dated April 17, 2006 regarding File #4C 1173 by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the following: Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council / Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 District #4 Environmental Commission I I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dated April 17, 2006, at Waterbury, Vermont + Gilman & Briggs Environmental s� OU � S 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5al C� Barre, Vermont 05641 (802) 479-7480 gbenvironmental n,earthlink.net 20 April 2006 Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: Application Conditional Use Determination, Spear Meadows Dear Sir/Madam, In accordance with Section 8.2 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, I am writing to inform you that an application for Conditional Use Determination (CUD) has been filed with the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) for impacts resulting from construction associated with the Spear Meadows development off Spear Street in South Burlington. Because these activities will occur within the buffer zone of a Class Two wetland protected under provisions of the Vermont Wetland Rules, a Conditional Use Determination is being sought from the ANR. The project will impact a total of 3,864 ft2 of wetland and 12,026 ft2 of wetland buffer zone, as described in the enclosed narrative. Complete copies of the Application for Conditional Use Determination are available for review at the South Burlington City Clerk's office, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission in South Burlington, and the Wetlands Office at the Agency of Natural Resources, I I I West Street in Essex Junction. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Errol C. Briggs ECB/s Encl. Spear Meadows Narrative Farrell Real Estate is proposing a 19-lot subdivision off Spear Street in South Burlington. Access to this development will be off Spear Street with connection to Vale Drive, an existing roadway in the Pinnacle at Spear development to the south. Construction of the roadways serving Spear Meadows will require two crossings of a narrow Class Two wetland, the first on the main access road into the northern end of the development, the second on a short section of roadway serving lots in the southwestern part of the project. The northern crossing will affect 1,995 ft2 of wetland and 12,026 ft2 of wetland buffer zone, and the southern crossing will affect 1,869 ft2 of wetland and 8,672 ft2 of buffer. An additional 600 ft2 of wetland buffer zone will be affected at the Vale Drive connection. The wetland at issue is designated as a Class Two wetland because it is contiguous to a wetland that appears on the Vermont Significant Wetland Inventory Map, a scrub/shrub and emergent wetland that is located primarily in the Pinnacle at Spear subdivision. The wetland drains to the north, narrowing to a wetland that, in places, is essentially a broad ditch. Dominant vegetation in this wetland is reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), with areas of shrub growth including willows (Salix sp.) and dogwoods (Cornus sp.). An evaluation of this wetland shows that it is significant for three of ten functions protected under provisions of the Vermont Wetland Rules: surface and groundwater protection because it treats runoff from nearby residential areas, wildlife and migratory bird habitat because it contains evidence that it is used by wetland dependent species (red -winged blackbirds), and open space and aesthetics because if can be readily seen by the public. Under the Rules, an application for Conditional Use Determination (CUD) is required for all non -allowed uses in Class Two wetlands and their 50-foot buffer zones. Project roads will be built to municipal standards, to include recreational paths, storm drainage, storm water management areas, and extensive erosion control measures. Details are shown on plan sheets accompanying the application for Conditional Use Determination which is available for review at the South Burlington City Clerk's office, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission at 30 Kimball Avenue in South Burlington, and the Vermont Water Quality Division office at 111 West Street, Essex Junction. If you have questions about this project and CUD application, please call or write Errol Briggs at Gilman & Briggs Environmental, 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5, Barre, VT 05641, telephone (802) 479-7480. Comments can also be addressed to Erin Haney, District Wetlands Ecologist, Water Quality Division, 111 West Street, Essex Jct., VT 05452, telephone (802) 879-2396. -r r ►►1TERgTA Spear Meadows Spear Street South Burlington, Vermont r- pR►VJ= JLL__ `- 11 -T J LOCATION MAP \ , N SCALE 1" = 2000' Application for Conditional Use Determination for Spear Meadows Spear Street South Burlington,Vermont prepared for Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, Vermont 05402 by Gilman & Briggs Environmental, Inc. 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, Vermont 05641 March 2006 Application for Conditional Use Determination for Spear Meadows Spear Street South Burlington,Vermont prepared for Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, Vermont 05402 by Gilman & Briggs Environmental, Inc. 1 Conti Circle, Suite S Barre, Vermont 05641 March 2006 CONDITIONAL USE DETERMINATION APPLICATION Title 10 V.S.A. Chapter 37, Section 905 File number: Date received: [ ] complete [ ] incomplete Date completed: DEC receiver_ INTRODUCTION The following questions must be answered in order for this application to be considered complete. If you have questions on any part of this form, please call the Vermont Wetlands Office at (802) 241-3770 for assistance. Please note that there is a non-refundable fee effective July 1, 2002 (see Section 19) as required by the Vermont General Assembly (3 V.S.A. § 29226)(26). Early consultation with the Wetlands Program may result in a reduction of the wetland area impacted. A pre -application site visit is required in order to call this application complete. NAMES Applicant: Eric Farrell Address: Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Telephone: (802) 658-7400 Landowner (if different) Brent Farrell, Kevin Farrell, Karen Maklad, Brenda Farrell Cole Address: 1350 Spear Street, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (If landowner is other than the applicant, attach copies of any easement, agreements, or other documents conveying permission, and an agreement with the landowner(s) stating who will be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the Conditional Use Determination. 3. Representative: Gilman & Briggs Environmental Address: 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, VT 05641 Telephone: (802) 479-7480 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location (Street Address): Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont 5. Acres owned by the Applicant and landowner at the project site: 26.19 Acres Acres involved in the project: 26.19 Acres Project purpose: Construction road crossings to serve a 19-lot residential subdivision. 7. General project description (include number and size of buildings; number of lots; length of roads; type of sewage disposal; etc.): The subdivision will consist of 18 single family residences and 12 duplex units. The principal access road will be approximately 3,456 feet long, running from Spear Street through Spear Meadows and connecting to existing street in the Pinnacle subdivision to the south. A second street, ca. 1100 feet long, will serve two single family lots and the 12 duplex units. The project will be served by municipal sewer and water. OTHER INFORMATION 8. Are there other federal, state or local permits required for this project, and if so have they been applied for or obtained? Required Applied for Obtained U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit X 401 Water Quality Certification X Vermont Act 250 Permit X Vermont Stormwater Discharge Permit X Vermont Lakes and Ponds Permit Vermont Stream Alteration Permit Local Zoning Permit X Wastewater & Potable Water Supply Permit X Other: Stormwater Discharge Permit X Wastewater System & Potable Water Supply Permit X Water Supply Construction Permit X Erosion Control Disharge Permit X 9. Attach the following information to the Application [ ✓J Location map (project area marked on the USGS topographic map or Vermont Significant Wetlands map). 1. Project area shown in relation to Class Two wetlands as drawn on the Vermont Significant Wetlands map. [ ✓J Site plan(s) including existing conditions, proposed work, erosion controls, and 2 wetland and buffer zone boundaries (see Sections 3.2. and 4.6 of the Vermont Wetlands Rules for description of methodology). [ ✓] Any other narratives or documents that the Applicant intends to rely upon in support of the proposed Conditional Use. 1. Wetland Evaluation 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dataforms 10. List the names and complete mailing address of all persons owning property within or adjacent to the wetland or buffer zone in question. Name Mailing Address with Zip Code Lakin/Milot Partnership P.O. Bog 4193, Burlington, VT 05401 UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect St., Burlington, VT 05401 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter, Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street, So. Burlington, VT 05403 WETLAND AND BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS IL Complete the following for the entire wetland in question: a. Size of wetland (to the nearest % acre): 2.0 acres b. Check the dominant type of wetland present: open water ✓ marsh ✓wet meadow shrub swamp forested swamp bog or fen beaver influenced wetland other (explain): C. Name all streams, rivers, lakes and ponds adjacent to the wetland and approximate distance from the proposed activity: An unnamed intermittent tributary to Potash Brook flows through the wetland. d. Approximate the percentage of each of the following cover types in the area surrounding the wetland: forested 50 agriculture 20 old field open water lawn 30 residential commercial/industrial road other (specify): c, 12. Complete the following for the portion of the wetland and buffer zone in the area of the proposed impact: a. Area of impact in wetland (sq. ft.): 3,864ft2 Northern crossing: 1,995 W Southern crossing: 1,869 W Area of impact in buffer zone (sq. ft.): 21,298 ft2 Northern crossing: 12,026 W Southern crossing: 8,672 ft* Vale Drive connection: 600 ft2 b. Check the type of wetland present (check all that apply) Open water ✓ Marsh ✓ Wet meadow Shrub swamp Forested swamp Bog or fen Beaver influenced wetland Other (explain): C. Description of dominant vegetation: The wetland is dominated by Phalaris arundinacea, associated with Leerzia oryzoides, Aster simple., Polygonum sagittatum, Agrostis alba and Agrostis stolonifera. d. Description of soils in the wetland and buffer zone (from Natural Resource Conservation Service soil surveys or site investigations): The soils in the area of the wetland are mapped as Covington silty clay, the upland is Vergennes clay. e. Check the characteristics of the wetland which apply: Flooded most of the time Standing water during at least part of the growing season. Water impounded by beavers. ✓ Soils are saturated during at least part of the growing season. Dry most of the year. e. Description of the buffer zone. The wetland buffer zone in the area of the proposed road crossings is mowed field on the east and mowed field or old field on the west. 13. Describe in detail all work that is proposed within the wetland or buffer zone, including erosion control measures, referencing attached plans where appropriate. The proposed roadways will be built in accordance with the City of South Burlington public works standards. Roadways across wetlands and buffer zones will have the same width and alignment as utility corridors through this area, so narrowing roads will not decrease the area of impact. Erosion control specifications are attached. 14. Before this section is completed, it will be necessary to determine for which functions the wetland in question is significant. The functional criteria for evaluating a wetland's M significance are described in Section 5 of the Vermont Wetland Rules. The Vermont Evaluation Form is available through the Wetlands Office to help determine which functions may be significant. Demonstrate the how the project as proposed will avoid any adverse impacts on each of the functions. Refer to plans and other attached documents as necessary. a. Water storage for flood water and storm runoff. The wetland is not significant for this function. b. Surface and groundwater protection: The capacity of the wetland to treat surface runoff will be augmented by installation of three stormwater management areas as shown on plan sheets C1.1, C1.3 and CIA c. Fisheries habitat: This wetland is not significant for this function. d. Wildlife and migratory bird habitat: The portions of the wetland that are serve as wildlife habitat will be left essentially unchanged by this project. e. Hydrophytic vegetation habitat This wetland is not significant for this function. f. Threatened or endangered species habitat: This wetland is not significant for this function. g. Education and research in natural sciences: This wetland is not significant for this function. h. Recreational value and economic benefits: This wetland is not significant for this function. i. Open space and aesthetics: The appearance of the project area wetlands will only be minimally changed (the area of the proposed road crossings is essentially a ditch, narrow at the northern crossing and slightly wider at the southern crossing). j. Erosion control through binding and stabilizing the soil: Standard erosion control techniques in conformance with the Vermont Handbook for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control will be employed. This will include properly maintained silt fencing to ensure no sediments or pollutants enter wetlands. Disturbed areas will be promptly restored according to the attached specifications. 15. Demonstrate by narrative and reference to plans that the following mitigation measures have been used to achieve no undue adverse impacts to wetland functions. a. Can the proposed activity practicably be located on an upland portion of the sites or another site owned, controlled, or available to satisfy the basic project purpose? (Explain). Considerations of public safety mandate a through street, making at least one crossing necessary; the second crossing is necessary because the area proposed for the duplex units is inaccessible without a second wetland crossing. In both instances, the wetland is crossed at narrow points to minimize impacts. b. Demonstrate how all practicable measures have been taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on protected functions, including project redesign or project scale - back. The crossings have been planned for narrow portions of the wetland to minimize impacts, and all other proposed activities are outside both the wetland and the wetland buffer zone. The protected wetland and buffer zone will he in common ownership of the Homeowners Assocation c. For wetlands that have been disturbed, what steps will be taken to restore impact functions (e.g., plantings, seedings, mulching exposed soil, removal of fill, etc.)? Erosion controls will be installed during construction and exposed areas will be seeded and mulched immediately after construction to ensure prompt stabilization. 16. Wetland compensation (creating replacement wetlands) is a measure to mitigate adverse impacts on protected functions that will only be possible in rare cases for specific functions (see Section 8.5c of the Vermont Wetland Rules). If a compensation plan is a part of this proposal, demonstrate by narrative and reference to plans how the steps in Section 8.5c(1)-(7) will be met. No compensation is planned for this project. DISTRIBUTION 17. Submit the original request for Conditional Use Determination to the Wetlands Office, Division of Water Quality, 103 South Main Street, 10 North, 2°d Floor, Waterbury 05671- 0408. Notification of receipt will be sent to the Applicant once a complete application has been received by the Wetlands Office. 18. After receiving the notification of completeness from the Wetlands Office, send a complete copy of the application to the Town Clerk and Regional Planning Commission. Also send copies of the location map, a description of the specific action(s) for which Conditional Use Determination is sought, the supporting narratives, and a listing of where complete copies of the request have been filed to: a. the municipal planning commission and/or conservation commission, and b. all persons owning property within or adjacent to the wetland and buffer zone (item 10 of the application). FEES 19. 3 V.S.A. § 2822 0) (26) Fees: Conditional Use Determination Minimum Application Fee: $ 50.00 PLUS Proposed wetland impact (3864 sq. ft. ► $0.07 per sq. ft.) $ 270.48 Proposed buffer zone impact (21,298 sq. ft. ► $0.05 per sq. ft.) $1064.90 Total fee enclosed: $1385.38 0 SIGNATURES 19. I hereby certify that the information provided above or attached to this application is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I recognize that by signing this application I am giving my consent to employees of the state to enter the subject property for the purpose of processing this application. Signature of Applicant Signature of Landowner Signature of Applicp6Y4 Representative Date Figure 1. Project location in relation to VSWI Mapped Class Two wetland Vermont Wetland Evaluation Form VERMONT WETLAND EVALUATION FORM Project Name: Spear Meadows, South Burlington, Vermont Date: 5 September 2004 Investigator: Errol C. Briggs Summary of Functional Evaluation NO 1. Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff YES 2. Surface and Ground Water Protection NO 3. Fisheries Habitat YES 4. Wildlife and Migratory Bird Habitat NO 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Habitat NO 6. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat NO 7. Education and Research in Natural Sciences NO 8. Recreational Value and Economic Benefits YES 9. Open Space and Aesthetics NO 10. Erosion Control Through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil NOTE: This form has been developed by the Department of Environmental Conservation, as a preliminary field checklist. Under Section 4.7 of the Vermont Wetland Rules, the Department of Environmental Conservation is given the authority to issue advisory opinions as to which functions, if any, are provided by a significant wetland. Although the Department may use this form as part of its evaluation of a particular wetland, completion of this form does not constitute a determination by the Department. Please contact the Wetlands Office at 241-3770 with questions about this form or about determining the functions that are provided by a particular wetland. Formal determinations are made by the Water Resources Board. 1. Water Storage for Flood Water and Storm Runoff YES Are any of the following conditions present downstream of the wetland, but upstream of a major lake or pond, that could be impacted by a loss or reduction of the water storage function?: YES 1. Developed public or private property; YES 2. Stream banks susceptible to scouring and erosion; YES 3. Important habitat for aquatic life, If so, the wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: NO a. Constricted outlet or no outlet and an unconstricted inlet; NO b. Physical space for floodwater expansion and dense, persistent emergent vegetation or dense woody vegetation that slows down flood waters during peak flows and facilitates water removal by evaporation and transpiration; NO c. If a stream is present, its course is sinuous and there is sufficient woody vegetation to intercept surface flows in the portion of the wetland that floods; NO d. Ratings of High or Moderate for Floodflow Alteration Effectiveness and Opportunity using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. Describe and characteristics of the watershed that may increase the volume of runoff reaching the wetland, such as large urbanized areas, relatively impervious soils or steep slopes: The wetland is in formerly agricultural lands and receives runoff from residential development (the Pinnacle subdivision). There are no steep slopes in the watershed above this wetland. Are any of the following conditions present, which may decrease the significance of the wetland for this function? YES e. Wetland surface area is less than 1 % of the watershed. area of wetland X 100 2 .100 - 0.04% watershed area 4709 NO f. Wetland is contiguous to a major lake or pond that provides storage benefits independently of the wetland. 2 NO g. The wetland's storage capacity is created primarily by beaver dams or other temporary structures. 2. Surface and Ground Water Protection Describe any land uses or characteristics of the watershed that may contribute\point or nonpoint sources of sediments, toxicants or nutrients to the wetland, such as: steep erodible slopes; row crops; dumps; areas of pesticide, herbicide or fertilizer application; feed lots; parking lots or heavily traveled roads; and septic systems. These factors will influence the importance of this function. Lands in the watershed immediately upstream of the project are entirely residential, and stormwater runoff currently flows to the stream passing through the wetland. There are no steep slopes in the wetland's watershed. The wetland is likely to be significant ifs of the following conditions are met: NO a. The wetland recharges a well head or aquifer protection area or a Class I or Class fI ground water area; YES b. Reduces levels of contaminants in surface waters which recharge under- lying or adjacent ground waters; NO c. Contributes to the flows of Class A surface waters; NO d. Enhances or protects water quality through chemical action or by the removal of nutrients (3 of the following 6): NO constricted or no outlets; UNK water sampling indicates removal of pollutants or nutrients; NO fine mineral soils and alkalinity not low; NO no dead forest or shrub areas, and no ditches or channels that confine water; YES low water velocity through dense, erect vegetation; YES hydroperiod permanently flooded or saturated. NO e. Enhances or protects water quality by the retention or removal of sediments or organic matter, or by moderating the adverse water quality effects of soil erosion or stormwater runoff; no artificial channelization of the wetland, no soil tillage and any one of the following: NO Constricted or no outlet; UNK water sampling indicates retention of sediments or organic matter NO wetlands in depositional environments with erect, persistent vegetation wider than 20 feet; NO wetlands with persistent vegetation comprising a defined delta, island, bar or peninsula. UNK f. Ratings of High or Moderate for Sediment Retention or Nutrient Removal using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. 3. Fisheries Habitat The wetland is likely to be significant if any of the following conditions are met: NO a. Provides spawning, nursery, feeding or cover habitat for fish (documented or professionally judged; NO b. Documented spawning habitat for northern pike; NO c. Contains woody vegetation that overhangs the banks of a stream or river and provides any of the following: shading that controls summer water temperature; cover including refuges created by overhanging branches or undercut banks; source of terrestrial insects as fish food; or stream - bank stability; NO d. Provides cold spring discharge that lowers the temperature of receiving waters and creates summer habitat for salmonid species. Comments: This wetland is not significant for fishery habitat. 4. Wildlife and Migratory Bird Habitat The wetland is likely to be significant if Any of the following conditions are met: NO a. Habitat to support one or more breeding pairs or broods or waterfowl; NO b. Supports or has the resting, staging or roosting habitat to support waterfowl migration; NO c. Provides a nest site, a buffer for a nest site or feeding habitat for great blue heron, black -crowned night heron, green -backed heron or snowy egret; 4 NO d. Supports or has the habitat to support one or more breeding pairs of any of the following species of birds: Virginia rail, sora rail, common moorhen (gallinule), American coot, snipe, horned grebe, marsh wren, Wilson's warbler, rusty blackbird, bay -breasted warbler, blue -gray gnatcatcher, black tern, American bittern, pied -billed grebe, least bittern, northern harrier, short -eared owl, black -backed woodpecker, three -toed woodpecker, spruce grouse, and Cerulean warbler; NO e. Contains evergreen trees and provides winter or necessary feeding habitat for white-tailed deer; NO f. Provides necessary feeding habitat for black bear or moose; UNK g. Contains evidence that it is used by muskrat, otter or mink; NO h. Supports an active beaver dam, one or more lodges, or evidence of use in two or more consecutive years by an adult beaver population; NO i. Provides habitat that supports the reproduction of Jefferson salamander, blue -spotted salamander, yellow -spotted salamander or other uncommon amphibians; NO j . Supports or has the habitat to support populations of any of the following reptile species: wood turtle, map turtle, stinkpot turtle or spotted turtle; NO k. Meets four or more of the following conditions indicative of wildlife habitat diversity: NO 1. three or more wetland vegetation classes (greater than 1/2 acre) present (not including wet meadows); YES 2. the dominant vegetation class is marsh or swamp; NO 3. located contiguous to a lake, pond, river or stream; YES 4. 50% or more surrounded by forest, agricultural land, old field or open land; NO 5. emergent or woody vegetation occupies 26 to 75 percent of wetland, the rest is open water; and YES 6. one of the following: NO i hydrologically connected to other wetlands of different dominant classes or open water within 1 mile; NO ii hydrologically connected to other wetlands of same dominant class within 1/2 mile; NO iii within 1 /4 mile of other wetlands of different dominant classes or open water, but not hydrologically connected; NO 1. Owned by state and federal government and managed as a wildlife area; YES m. Contains evidence that it is used by wetland dependent wildlife species. Comments: This wetland likely supports breeding of such species as red - winged blackbirds. 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation Habitat The wetland is significant if any of the following conditions are met: NO a. Wetland is one of the following types of uncommon plant communities: bogs, fens, alpine peatland, or black gum swamps; NO b. Exceptional example of one or more of the following wetland types: deep marsh dominated by rushes or cattails, shallow marsh, shrub swamp, wooded swamp dominated by hardwoods, cedar or spruce/fir/tamarack; NO c. Provides habitat for rare species of hydrophytic vegetation; NO d. Contains one or more plant species at their range limits; and NO e. Contains disjunct plant species 40 miles or more from the nearest population. Species or communities of concern: None. 6. Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Wetlands that contain species on the federal or state threatened or endangered species lists are significant for this function. The wetland is also likely to be significant if either of the following apply: NO a. There is creditable documentation that the wetland provides important habitat for any species on the federal or state threatened or endangered species lists; 6 NO b. There is creditable documentation that threatened or endangered species have been present in the past 10 years. Name of species and ranking: None. 7. Education and Research in Natural Sciences The wetland is likely to be significant if gny of the following apply: NO a. Owned or leased to a public entity dedicated to education or research; NO b. History of use for education or research, or scientific papers exist on the wetland; NO c. Has one or more characteristics making it valuable for education or research. Continents: The wetland is not significant for this function. S. Recreational Value and Economic Benefits The wetland is likely to be significant if Any of the following apply: NO a. Used for or contributes to recreational activities; NO b. Provides economic benefits; NO c. Provides important habitat for fish and wildlife which can be fished, hunted or trapped; NO d. Used for harvesting wild foods. Comments: The wetland is not significant for this function. 9.Open Space and Aesthetics The wetland is likely to be significant if either of the following apply: YES a. Can be readily observed by the public, and possesses special or unique aesthetic qualities as open space; NO b. Has prominence as a distinct feature of the surrounding landscape. Comments: This wetland can be observed by the public from adjacent homes and the residential subdivision. 7 10. Erosion Control through Binding and Stabilizing the Soil The wetland is likely to be significant if there are erosive forces present and any of the following characteristics are present: NO a. Forested, shrub, or emergent wetland adjacent to a lake, river, or stream; YES b. Dense, erect vegetation greater than 20 feet wide; N/A c. Wetland substrate exposed to erosive forces is rubble, cobble, or gravel; N/A d. Good interspersion of persistent emergent vegetation and water along course of stream flow; NO e. Studies show that wetlands of similar size, vegetation type, and hydrology are important for erosion control; NO f. Ratings of High or Moderate for Sediment Stabilization using the Wetland Evaluation Technique. What type of erosive forces is present? NO Lake fetch and waves; NO High current velocities; NO Water level influenced by upstream impoundment. Comments: There are no erosive forces in this wetland. 8 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Da#aforms Project Title: 14 /j/ZE-Q_ V ,A17- 5.7, File Number: Tronsecl: % Plot: �dgffl illi @ 40—R Dale: J Sfia d2 DATA -- Stratum and Species Dominance Rollo Percent Dominance NWI Status VEGETATION (DOMINANTS ONLY) 1IWI1AaAI4C64 SO Fh L W D/y,Zal4 s �s CDC S FACW rS /,.p.J,�e D��astsc.c Zt4ee fA c � 9 7icr6r AJ/16JTif A144 Jiecsli %e, �ACtJ FACW OBL: FACW: FAC: FACU: UPL: Tally (Dominants ONLY): 100 x Domino nt(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum I002 Describe Vegetation Dislurbonce: Describe Problem Vegetation; DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of Engineers Re tonal Drains a Class: Criterion; Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes Q No 11 Title/Dote: Soil Survey of Chittenden Soil Type Mapped: Col//w/ „� llt C/A County, Vermont 1974 Depth Horizon Molrix Color (Munsell, Moist) Color of Mollies Munsell, M isl) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive —� /ors 3/z vndance%Conlrosl loyore, root distribution, oxidixed rhizospheres, etc. !� 4 A- s!/� ell u�ajvvozc� jr*'*U— CGMAIW J.31;;I1, e: R& x e T/*CX e 5 •5-A 3/-I A lry cz"rp 4-,,fA Remarks: Sketch Londscape Position; �o UPI r 1 1. IPW M as the Io14.Me Is «Ileneo that the $as is NOT km" SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: L TNs Ne sl Is "Ed fora ty the lei I ►e �roI of i-Ml a iN. zZ.we reu(kw *I b. W"repkil. M vn,,.vd te.... ® An dominant plants ore OBLIGATE. ©� All dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. Soil Is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ®The soil motto the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as o VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®� The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Ye NO CD M 1. Within B Inches of the soil surface there ore: Ye No o. soil mottle within an A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chromo 3 or less; OR ❑CDc. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil it mottled throughout. ❑ 2. Within 24 inches of the sod surface, there are mottles which are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chromo 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No ❑ a. In the horizon that riot within 10 Inches of the soil surface and directly benooth a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chromo 3 or lass; the mottle ore at least 10X In abundance and distinct or prominent. b. When a dorksAp horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrk when: I. hydrophytes are prevalent, If. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and fit. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chromo 3 or less and mottles are at least IOX in abundance and distinct or prominent. ® Check here and attach a daaafipt(on of youf pfocadufff and conclusions if one of the following options were chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured rodox potentials, colormetric test for ferrous iron test (d,ti,—Dipyridil), or other measurements and observations, . Typically in New England, soils having those morphologies will be classified In an aquic suborder or on oquic subgroup In soil taxonomy. s. Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having o value of 3 or less Remarks: 1. IdGelsoy le eflM the mod ilM1sult ledve le s►sens. DATA k NOTE2, Werpnlellene roust Mnel/er the eppeprlelM.ws Of the N.—.0— M : DETERMINATION eeht of tM se..en, reeMt ...(her e.Mas,w, .nd w1.r.hw .arellon...I& HYDROLOGY - 3. Werpr.tell.n of hydr.legy —y r.quk. r.p.ot.a eb--u*n w.r m.rs the. en. s.aun. ❑ Recorded Octal Stream, lake or lidol goge Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Fret Water. ;> Depth to Saturation: ">/Rv Describe Altered Hydrology: S1761"'O ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Marks 2r Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Line B Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas COW41lond Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: Lmore Pneumalophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hyportrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Advtntitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchyma in Roots dt stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Solis and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Titlev �RRdIL f&//f Jr Delineator: E.C.Briggs Trant.at: Plat: 'I:�` @,a- '�Y Date; if efe"aol Yes No Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? 190 Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ® ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology Criterion Mel? ® ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ® ❑ Remarks; Project Title: e[,� /vt J7 File Number: Tronsecl: Plot: 41/e.'4^0 le ,��—ZY 0ate: S .7" GZ DATA -- VEGETATION Slrolum and Species (DOMINANTS ONLY) Dominance Rolar percent Dominance NWI Status 7eter�: iv,P.eJe e3el',t fAr; A -AP eJ A►t% /tfc(��i;IJ Tyf!'Cq S t1PL film �CiS�l�rdCl- OA �RVJ s,f/�i s f4ttl !p FAcq SLr.�,gq vitiJ v eo u rL FAG -'a Tally (Dominants ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAC: FACU:3 UPL: SUM:3 100 x Dominont(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum 0% Describe Vegetation Disturbance: Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Cores of Engineers Re tonal Ora na a Class: Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Avcilable? Yes JR No ❑ T'ille/Dote: Soil Survey of Chittenden Soil Type Mapped: Vr/J epty= Cliff County, Vermont 1974 Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) Color of Mottles Munsell, M is USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive Ic distribution, —G undonce%Contrast ers, root oxidized rhizospheres, etc. 6 1/2' /vOre y-e ioyz er�1 �® s� t Seer CI.Iy d o-lL /57/Afel Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: LAwa pL�FtD t AWL(4 1, -HV h .s V. loae.kog I. «Yws that the eee Is NOT RrOA10 SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: L TM' a 6JI t 1. Bei+-IV . 1,y he eKy b i sPof t:ngMewsl ]. 1Ns Inl.rpnWe nu1W rney be Wppreprlato In emwud taws. Toe NO 081 An dominant plants are OBLIGATE. 0 ® NI dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. ® Soil Is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duration longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach on explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology, ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL and then is no evidence of altered hydrology. ® The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two characteristics': Yea NO ® 1. Within 8 Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No ®o. 'mottles within an A or Ap horizon and til he subsoil is mottled throughout; OR CD l9b., common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chromo 3 or less; OR CDI q c. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres lJ and the subsoil is mottled throughout. [a or. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which on common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No tGl a. In the horizon that ties within 10 inches of the soil Jar surface and direc tly beneath o darks' A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chromo 3 or less, the mottles are at least 10X In abundance and distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dork'Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic moiler. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydrk when: 1. hydrophytes are prevalent. It. there Is no evidence of altered hydrology, and Ill, in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chromo 3 or less and mottles are of least 10X in abundance and distinct or prominent. Check here and attach a description of your procedures and conclusions 11 one of the following options were chosen for your hydrk soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormetric list for ferrous Iron lest (d,w,—Oipyridil), or other measurements and observations, *Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In on cquic suborder or an oquic subgroup In soil taxonomy. .. Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having o value of 3 or less Remarks: 1, lyer.t.ay Is often the "$I 41wt bdv. to ebwn.. DATA k 2. tM.IpI.414nt w.t Mn.idw the epp•prlston.se .f the b..-Wan. 1, NOTE: DETERMINATION eehl •1 It. sw.en, ..tent ..NNr tonettlw, uJ ret.rohw onwe4—, L. HYDROLOGY J. W.rpr.Wtten of ",.Low —y r.q k. r.p-t.4 eb..ry U ...... mw. awn on. s.esen. ❑ Recorded Data: Stream, lake or tidal gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other - Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water. 71 Depth to Saturation: B - rt�� Describe Altered Hydrology: YC44A ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 121n. ❑ Water Marks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment CDSurface Scoured Areas ❑ Wetland Droinoge Polltrns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adaptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumolophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Inflated Leaves, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ] Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchyma in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Titbi FNl,G� Delineator. E.C.Brigg3 Tron:ect: Plat: (��IL @� — Z y Date: J r�2 G Yes No Hydrophylic Vegetation Criterion Met? ❑ R Hydric Soils Criterion Met? ❑ ® Yes No Wetland Hydrology Criterion Met? Q ® IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ❑ Remarks; Cathyann LaRose From: Craig Lambert [sbpwcl@adelphia.net] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:08 PM To: Cathyann LaRose Cc: mike@tjboyle.com Subject: Spear Meadows ;athy, lust touching base to let you know the landscape revisions for Spear Meadows look fine. Thanks. ;raig Lambert >outh Burlington City Arborist 502-658-7961 ax: 802-658-7976 ;mail: s pwcl@adelphia.net 5/16/2006 TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT SPEAR MEADOWS SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT MARCH 28, 2005 Prepared For: Farrell Real Estate, Inc. P O Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 FUSS & O'Neill 146 Hartford Road, Manchester, CT 06040 pjo �/ TEL 860 646-2469 FAX 86o 533-5143 56 Quarry Road, Trumbull, CT 06611 TEL 2o3 374-3748 FAX 203 374-4391 7040 West Palmetto Park Road, #4812 Boca Raton, FL 33433 TEL 800 850-2348 FAX 561 368-5614 78 Interstate Drive, West Springfield, MA 01089 TEL 413 452-0445 FAX 413 846-0497 24 Madison Avenue Extension, Albany, NY 12203 TEL 518 218-0600 FAX 516 218-0606 2600 South Road, Suite 44-246 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 TEL 800 394-8081 FAx 845 691-7098 610 Lynndale Court - Suite E, Greenville, NC 27858 TEL 252 355-1370 FAX 252 355-8186 The Foundry Corporate Office Center 275 Promenade Street, Suite 350, Providence, RI 02908 TEL 401 861-3070 FAX 401 861-3076 1419 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29201 TEL 803 376-6034 FAX 8o3 376-6035 928 Falls Road, Shelburne, VT 05482 TEL 802 985-1512 FAx 8o2 985-2271 FA\P2004\0945\AIO\Traffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY RFPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. Trip Distribution After estimating the project -related generated vehicle trips, the trip distribution of this traffic was estimated and assigned to the local roadway network. The directional distribution of site traffic approaching and departing the development was based on existing traffic patterns from residential traffic counts conducted at the Deerfield Drive intersection with Spear Street and at the Cedar Glen Drive intersection. These counts suggested a north -south directional split of roughly 85% to/from the north, and 15% to/from the south. Some traffic movement to/from the east via Dorset Street as an alternative to Spear Street was also assumed; this is based on the connection to Vale Drive. A 20% distribution oriented to/from Dorset Street was used. Figures 8 and 9 illustrate the site -generated traffic assigned to the study area intersections for this project. The volumes in these figures do not account for the likely additional traffic from Vale Drive and Four Sisters Road. Some existing traffic from these residential streets that is destined to the north via Spear Street will likely use the new street as an alternative to using Nowland Farm Road. Because the new street is proposed to connect with the north end of Vale Drive (currently a cul-de-sac at the north end), the traffic estimates at the new street intersection with Spear Street and at the south end of Vale Drive were assumed to reflect some diversion (i.e. change in travel route) for some residents on Vale Drive and the north end of Four Sisters Road. Figure 12 indicates the estimated traffic on the proposed new street for the weekday AM (morning) peak hour. This traffic accounts for the estimated diversion of some traffic from Vale Drive and Four Sisters Road. Figure 13 indicates the estimated traffic for the PM (afternoon) peak hour condition, accounting for expected diversion of some traffic from Vale and Four Sisters. Projected Traffic Without The Proposed Project Traffic was projected five years to the future (i.e. full build out and occupancy) to the year 2009. This future period was analyzed for two conditions: a 2009 NO BUILD condition and a 2009 BUILD condition. Figures 6 and 7 illustrates the 2009 NO BUILD traffic volumes. The NO BUILD traffic volumes for Spear Street include a normal annual growth in traffic using this corridor, plus the addition of other programmed development along Spear Street either approved for construction or in the review process. These projects include the following: • UVM Housing & Parking Garage Project • Quarry Hill Residential Development • Forest Glen Development • Snyder Residential Project • Redstone Residential Development • South Village A one percent (1%) annual growth rate was used. Programmed development traffic estimates were based on estimates contained in the Spear Street Corridor Study. 3 FAP2004\0945\A10\Traffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. Projected Traffic With The Proposed Project Projected site generated traffic estimated for this project was added to the proposed NO BUILD traffic to determine the projected 2009 BUILD volumes. Figures 10 and 11 illustrate the volumes for this BUILD condition, assuming no diversion of traffic from Vale Drive or Four Sisters Road. This BUILD condition would be the case if there was no street connection to Vale Drive. Since there is a street connection to Vale Drive proposed, the BUILD traffic volumes should reflect the likely diversion of some Vale Drive traffic to the new street. This condition is shown in the 2009 BUILD volumes in Figure 14 (for the AM period) and Figure 15 (for the PM period). IMPACT ON CAPACITY AND SAFETY Level of Service Analysis An analysis was made of the levels of service for turning movements at the new site roadway intersection with Spear Street, at the Nowland Farm Road intersection to the south, and at the Vale Drive/Nowland Farm Road intersection. Table 2 in the appendix summarizes the Level Of Service (LOS) for these turning movements. As is true with other side streets along Spear Street in this area, there are typically long delays to left turn traffic turning into Spear Street during morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. However, the expected left turn traffic generated by the site at the new road intersection with Spear Street is very low in volume less than 5 vehicles estimated during the peak hours). Right turns out do not experience as much delay as left turns. With some existing traffic from Vale Drive and Four Sisters Road expected to divert to the new street, there will actually be less traffic at the Nowland Farm/Spear Street intersection. Accordingly, there is expected to actually be a slight decrease (improvement) in delays to turning vehicles at this intersection during the AM and PM peak traffic hours. Traffic Added to Spear Street The traffic added on surrounding roadways due to the proposed development for the highest peak hour of traffic generation for the site (i.e. the afternoon peak hour, estimated at 4:30 to 5:30 PM) is estimated as follows: • Spear Street north of the site: 15 vehicles added southbound 8 vehicles added northbound • Spear Street south of the site: 4 FAP2004\0945\A I Mraffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. 1 vehicle added southbound 1 vehicle added northbound • Vale Drive (to/from Nowland Farm Road): 3 vehicles added southbound 5 vehicles added northbound These volumes are indicated graphically on Figure 9. Other Safety Considerations The accident history at the intersections of Cedar Glen, Pinnacle Drive, and Nowland Farm Road was reviewed as contained in the Spear Street Corridor Study. This contained information for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003. There were no high accident locations indicated from this data. Accident data was also obtained from the South Burlington Police Department for this section of Spear Street for the year 2004. There was no significant accident history in the area between Spear Street and Nowland Farm Road for this latest period. Stopping sight distance at the proposed road to Spear Meadows at Spear Street is good viewing to the north and south. Intersection sight distance can be provided assuming that the existing evergreen hedge is cut back in the vicinity of the proposed street to allow for a clear sight triangle viewing back from the edge of Spear Street. Regarding turning lanes, it is proposed to construct separate left and right turn lanes on the new street at its approach to Spear Street. This will help minimize vehicle delays to right - urn traffic leaving the site to head north on Spear Street during peak traffic periods. The volume of through traffic northbound on Spear Street during peak traffic hours is high enough to indicate that special treatment for left turns (southbound) turning into the site should be considered. However, more detailed survey (i.e. street right-of-way location) and engineering detail (e.g. drainage, landscaping, utility information) needs to be established before the ability to create additional roadway width to accommodate a left turn lane can be determined. 5 FAP2004\0945\A I Mraffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the review and analysis of existing and projected traffic conditions in the study area, the following is concluded with regard to the proposed residential development. 1. During the weekday evening peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 33 total vehicle trips: an estimated 21 vehicles entering the site and 12 vehicles exiting the site. 2. The residential project will not result in a significant adverse impact to traffic on Spear Street or other streets such as Vale Drive or Nowland Farm Road. The added traffic is of relatively low volume. Consistent with South Burlington residential development planning, the project will have a connection to existing residential streets that will provide for alternative vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access to the proposed homes. 3. Adequate stopping sight distance is provided at the proposed intersection of the new development street with Spear Street. 4. Left turn treatment southbound on Spear Street should be considered at the intersection of the proposed new site road. 5. It is recommended that enough pavement width be provided on the site road at its approach to Spear Street to allow for separate right turn and left turn lanes. 6 F:\P2004\0945\AIMraffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. APPENDIX FIGURES 1 - 15 TABLE 2 ACCIDENT DATA HIGHWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS F:\P2004\0945\A10\Tratiic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc LOCATION MAP N SCALE 1" = 2000' FARRELL - SPEAR STREET SKETCH FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION N SITE co oQ M j / o i O kO pRRRF�F�O oRl ` �2S v �� o/ �� F RM �A�N �3 73 8/ � �( O Fuss & O'Neill consul era �+ (413) 4=-o446 FIGURE 2 S EXISTING CONDITION WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 TO 8:30 AM DECEMBER 2004 ! PROJ. NO. 20040945A10 DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS " SITE L Q a oQ no j %l o Q J� > O DRRRFjF�D D �M _ � q '� s 1 NowC FARM ARp D40 C O O Fuss & O'Neill conna nee" -7a��- (413) 452-0443 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITION WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR 4:30TO5:30AM DECEMBER 2004 PROD. N0. 20040945.A10 DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS N co SITE CO w co a o� J� �O 48 No cop rFARM �" �- 24 � 5 85 ,r Fuss & O'Neill ConstaurtmIEngineers (413) 452-OM FIGURE 4 0 2004 DESIGN VOLUMES WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR W 7:30TO8:30AM PROD. NO. 20040945AlO DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS N n SITE W IX o oQ J� 9 22 �35 ---58 �N ROAo ,o 47 Fuss & O'Neill oC..a 7 t� a t,w�rs -- 0445 NOTE: FIGURE 5 TRAFFIC REPRESENTS DESIGN HOUR S CONDITIONS So:2004 DESIGN VOLUMES WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR W{ 4:30TO5:30PM [RROJ. NO. 20040945A10 DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS N n h ll SITE 0 oQ W o a J� > O pFERF�RCD D ^ N k 48 1�30 �o 1.2 Rp��ANO f�pA / 25 5 89 Fuss & O'Neill consiaits rftwtu ,V >�� olon (413) 452--0"5 NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED � FIGURE 6 DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET 2009 NO BUILD CONDITION CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR w TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROD. NO. 20040945.AlO DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS 4 DFERF/BCD D RIVE NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE N J kO f' Fuss &O'Neill I 7aWON 8"�t"` �I FIGURE 7 2009 NO BUILD CONDITION 1�I WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR W TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROD. NO. 20040945A10 DATE. 02/2005 SCALE NTS C DEFRF/,FCD D RIVE °`"`AND M VOA t NOTE: WITHOU VALE DRIVE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s 1 1 1 w 0 w .J SITE w co DRRRF�E�D �R/ VF NOTE: IW THOUT VALE DRIVE CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC W W J SITE co J DFFRF/eLD D RIVE NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE ASSUMES NO CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC FROM VALE DRIVE OR FOUR SISTERS ROAD 0 E W �FFRF/E�� �Rl VF NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE ASSUMES NO CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC FROM VALE DRIVE OR FOUR SISTERS ROAD /Go 32 i 1 �r SITE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /s l 1 16 �Q or Cif 0 a � � w J pE j �O �RFIE�p p � �qR Lo M Roq p L -, —3 Fuss & O'Neill ConsWtwW,wars NOTE: NEGATIVE (—) NUMBER REFLECTS S FIGURE 12 DECREASE IN TRAFFIC DUE TO SITE TRAFFIC PLUS DIVERTED TRAFFIC DIVERSION `` WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR �IROJ. NO. 20040945.A10 DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS N N SITE o, bui 0 o� w Q QJ� > �O DEER���CD D A RI f,1 N A p -4 --% -2 f Fuss & O'Neill (413) 432-OM NOTE: FIGURE 13 NEGATIVE (—) NUMBER REFLECTS S DECREASE IN TRAFFIC DUE TO SITE TRAFFIC PLUS DIVERTED TRAFFIC DIVERSION `` WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR w PROD. NO. 20040945.A10 DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS M lea / 32 SITE 9 lf� a ' lg �Q- W � c a � � o w J� J � Q � DEERF��CD A o > DRjv i2 FAR SAND -- �4 Ir M RD 24 AD 2-J 89 NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE o w M �N N 1r 1� SITE o, /V __j o� o Q J 9 JL Aso 04 READ 47 OFouususlh& O'Neill is C.n..=w .h n° hLA 3i�' (413) 432-0445 NOTE: INCLUDES OTHER PROGRAMMED FIGURE DEVELOPMENT ALONG SPEAR STREET 2009 BUILD WITH DIVERSION CORRIDOR, INCLUDING SOUTH VILLAGE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR w TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJ. NO. 20040945AlO DATE: 02/2005 SCALE: NTS TABLE 2 MORNING/EVENING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 2004 Existing 2009 No Build 2009 Build av I LOS Delav LOS Delav LOS Spear St / Deerfield / Nowland Spear St NB Left/Through/Right 8.2 / 9.8 Spear St SB Left 9.8 / 8.7 Deerfield Dr EB Left/Through/Right 65.7 / 65.9 Nowland Farm Rd WB Left/Through 45.6 / 79.2 Nowland Farm Rd WB Right 15.7 / 12.0 Nowland Farm Road / Vale Drive Nowland Farm Rd EB Left/Through 1 7.3 / 7.3 Vale Dr SB Left/Right 8.8 / 9.3 Spear Street / Proposed Site Road Spear St SB Left/Through - Proposed Site Rd WB Left - Proposed Site Rd WB Right - Note: Delay is average control delay per vehicle, in seconds. A/A 8.6/11.2 A/B 8.6/11.2 A/B A/A 11.1 /9.4 B/A 11.0/9.3 B/A F/F 275.7/286.6 F/F 218.8/237.6 F/F E/F 131.5/360.7 F/F 130.9/340.3 F/F C/B 20.9/14.0 C/B 19.8/14.0 C/B A / A 7.3 / 7.4 A / A 7.3 / 7.4 A / A A / A 8.8 / 9.3 A / A 9.0 / 9.2 A / A - - - 11.6/9.5 B/A - - - 52.4/78.5 F/F - - - 25.9/14.6 C/B Accidents By Location From Date: 01/01/2004 Thru Date: 12/31/2004 Location SPEAR ST / NOWLAND FARM RD TOTAL ACCIDENTS AT ABOVE LOCATION: 1 TOTAL ACCIDENTS FOR ORI : 1 Accident # Date/Time # Units # of Inj 200404772 07/01/0416:57:00 Report Prop Dmg Descr street sign hit in MVA SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT ORI Number: VT0040300 BAC Test Rslts Fuss & O'Neill Inc. coti,,,it;,,X North d � y PROJECT LOCATION MUNICIPALITY S. BUi-/l'I)J- )J r) COUNTY DATE lL//5�� y SIATWTFS TIME FROM 7; M TO 9%0 U F%M (Indicate Da,; Now/�,�GF�rr, I y5� TIME AM or PM 2 33 �% 5t 7 /� /O �/ TO Ll v 93 Wo 7 ;3a 7; 1`6 0 /53 22 L/ 75- n i j l 9 Z C� Q g; 30 //I/ // 7 O -3 `i 72- Z � 5� 8:, o p -7 3 FUSS &O'NeiII Itic. Ci»r.cu(�in� E)tSincc�:c North y PROJECT LOCATION f MUNICIPALITY �• f3vr/i4 J�rn� COUNTY DATE /2/15/0ci TIME FROM V, UD PM TO � GX7 t- M SMTWTFS (Indicate Day) ys6 TIME AM or PM / 2 3 l0 // tz. TOTAL 7 o/ 0 78 3 / 2 Z /y7 y 3 y, sus Z v o 2 5 /3 /9/ 23 o z 7/ 7 6, o0 76 D /2 a 2 6 yg 1�7 Fuss &Oi Neill Inc. co,, atirtg En�irurrc PROJECT LOCATION I MUNICIPALITY S f3ur/l4)Y,,7 COUNTY DATE �Z`�S/Uri 1,00 P SMTWTFS TIME FROM / . 9 OU i� M TO M (Indicate Day) Q � 9 TIME AM or PM C� TOTAL 7'o a - 7;/S /3 7:30 7 '7 D 3 S 30 y;oo Fuss &O'Neill Inc. c0ii,eiting f_'tt�ineets PROJECT LOCATION MUNICIPALITY COUNTY DATE /Z//S�IJ n SMTWTFS TIME FROM y:00 !- M TO 6.'dU 7r' M(Indicate Day) TIME AM or PM / z 8 /tj / TOTA y,s 'V: y5- 2 S /o i 3 $,ov 3 /3 U f 3 13 1 3 0 S vs -6;ov I l z FUSS el I I Inc. co,vit/►rng f_n�i►uc►:� /vOw�Gc�d fGtY►� 2 PROJECT LOCATION MUNICIPALITY S. t3���in`�►� COUNTY DATE /-05),ot' SMTY/TFS TIME FROM -7%00 4 M TO J-60 M (indicate Day) TIME AM or PM 2 Z TOTA 7,ov -7;/s 2 7: i $ d /S 3 �/ 2 /Z tj5 p 3/b Q'3o O /6 7 6 - � �v FUSS & O'Neil( f nc. (cur.sviting F_rr�irrccrs PROJECT LOCATION MUNICIPALITY S, G'' u ✓�� l f fey COUNTY DATE /z//S/G� SMTWTFS TIME FROM -Y,'00 P M TO 6:00 r� M (Indicate Da TIME AM or PM / 2 S /Q /Z TOT y-,s o 9 z p a 1 Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TABLE A LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS CONTROL DELAY PER VEHICLE LEVEL OF SERVICE (SEC) A <10 B >10 and < 20 C >20 and < 35 D >35 and < 55 E >55 and < 80 F >80 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 1998, Table 9-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS CONTROL DELAY TO TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE (Sec. Per Vehicle) A <10 B >10and <15 C >15 and < 25 D >25 and < 35 E >35 and < 50 F >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 1998, Table 10-7. FAPAMADFORMS\Level of Service.doc TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/2/2005 AM PEAK - 7:30 TO 8:30 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2004 - DECEMBER Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 617 49 19 316 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 701 55 21 1 359 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 25 1 23 41 10 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 28 1 1 26 46 1 11 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 0 21 29 26 57 C(m)(vph) 1194 864 169 427 167 lc 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.06 0.34 95% queue length 0.00 0.07 0.60 0.19 1.41 Control Delay 8.0 9.3 30.7 14.0 37.3 LOS A A D 8 E ,Approach Delay -- -- 22.8 37.3 pproach LOS -- -- C E TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst GJR Agency/Co. FUSS & O'NEILL Date Performed 2/2/2005 Analysis Time Period AM PEAK - 7.30 TO 8:30 Intersection SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2004 - DESICaN HouR Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 718 57 22 368 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 815 1 64 25 1 418 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 29 1 27 48 12 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 1 30 54 13 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR v (vph) 1 25 33 30 67 C (m)(vph) 1134 777 121 365 122 lc 0.00 0.03 0.27 0.08 0.55 95% queue length 0.00 0.10 1.03 0.27 2.64 Control Delay 8.2 9.8 45.6 15.7 65.7 LOS A A E C F ,Approach Delay -- -- 31.4 65.7 pproach LOS -- -- D F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/2/2005 AM PEAK - 7.30 TO 8:30 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2009 - NO BUILD Project Description East7west Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 947 60 23 497 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1076 68 26 1 564 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 30 1 28 48 12 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 1 31 54 1 13 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 1 26 35 31 67 C (m) (vph) 1001 618 59 257 59 lc 0.00 0.04 0.59 0.12 1.14 95% queue length 0.00 0.13 2.42 0.41 5.54 Control Delay 8.6 11.1 131.5 20.9 275.7 LOS A B F C F Approach Delay -- -- 79.6 275.7 pproach LOS -- -- F F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 21212005 AM PEAK - 7:30 TO 8:30 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2009 -BUILD DIVERTED Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 948 60 20 498 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 1077 1 68 22 565 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 31 1 13 48 12 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 35 1 14 54 1 13 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 1 22 36 14 68 C (m)(vph) 1001 618 60 257 67 lc 0.00 0.04 0.60 0.05 1.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.11 2.47 0.17 5.11 Control Delay 8.6 11.0 130.9 19.8 218.8 LOS A B F C F Approach Delay -- -- 99.8 218.8 [Approach LOS -- -- F F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/3/2005 7.30 TO 8:30 AM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR 2004 - DECEMBER DATA Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 73 0 0 21 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 4 82 0 0 23 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 9 0 22 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 10 0 25 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 4 35 Capacity, cm (vph) 1601 1002 v/c ratio 0.00 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.11 Control Delay s/veh 7.3 8.7 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh 8.7 Approach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & OWEILL 2/3/2005 7:30 TO 8:30 AM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR 2004 - E p a%'fH DES16AI AJOUR Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 85 0 0 24 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 5 96 0 0 27 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 10 0 26 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 11 0 29 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 5 40 Capacity, cm (vph) 1596 I 992 v/c ratio 0.00 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.01 I 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 8.8 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh 8.8 Approach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/3/2005 7:30 TO 8:30 AM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR 2009 - NO BUILD Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 89 0 0 25 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 5 101 0 0 28 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 10 0 26 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h 0 0 0 11 0 29 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 5 40 Capacity, cm (vph) 1595 988 v/c ratio 0.00 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.13 Control Delay s/veh 7.3 8.8 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh) 8.8 Approach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d . -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMAn General Information f _ Site Information .. Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & OWEILL 2/3/2005 7.30 TO 8:30 AM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR 2009 - BUILD DIVERTED Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 V6606,.... .�..-,. .prp...yn...fT"",W ij.w'nrn t..:�'r. .y. .....^� :. ,.r,','. Yy4 -..kTO ' '.." *z "Y 5,-"" �'t! .'`. L` Ly -'..{ f %'^�..: TL Sr .^,.,, �5.e' �Volumes.�a6`d A' ustments .,r, . _ .... , : � r:: k. zlm .�.:. „ �,�.� � � ,...a � Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 89 0 0 24 4 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 2 101 0 0 27 4 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 — 0 — Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 15 0 13 Peak -hour factor, PHF a88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 1 0 17 0 1 14 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Contorol Deta Queue" Len t-- t h,T.�L. ev,,., el of Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 2 31 Capacity, cm (vph) 1595 939 v/c ratio 0.00 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.00 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.0 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.0 Approach LOS — — A HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General `lnformation'Yb _' Site'Information Analyst GJR Intersection SPEAR ST/PROPOSED SITE Agency/Co. FUSS & OWE1LL RD Jurisdiction Date Performed 2/3/2005 Analysis Year 2009 -BUILD DIVERTED Analysis Time Period 7.-30 TO 8:30 AM Project Description East/West Street: PROPOSED SITE ROAD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Voluhies °and ,Adiustmehts Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 1116 1 8 534 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 1268 1 9 606 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 0 32 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 36 0 10 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R beta ~Queue Lent an ,Levet8of:5erv1ce ?,' ,=Kxa r? , Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 _ 12 Lane Configuration LT L R v (vph) 9 1 36 C (m) (vph) 554 77 208 v/c 0.02 0.01 0.17 95% queue length 0.05 0.04 0.61 Control Delay 11.6 52.4 25.9 LOS 8 F D Approach Delay -- -- 26.6 Approach LOS -- -- D Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 21312005 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2004 - DECEMBER DATA Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD [North;/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South dPeriod hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 4 405 17 33 626 42 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 470 1 19 38 1 727 48 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 30 6 16 19 2 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 6 18 22 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 4 38 40 18 25 C (m)(vph) 850 1085 132 590 128 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.30 0.03 0.20 95% queue length 0.01 0.11 1.18 0.09 0.69 Control Delay 9.3 8.4 43.7 11.3 39.8 LOS A A E 8 E ,Approach Delay -- -- 33.7 39.8 pproach LOS -- -- D E TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/3/2005 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2004 - DE5/4/V hFoct� Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 5 471 20 38 729 49 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 547 23 44 1 847 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 35 7 19 22 2 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 8 22 25 1 2 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT L R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 5 44 48 22 28 C (m) (vph) 761 1013 93 533 86 lc 0.01 0.04 0.52 0.04 0.33 95% queue length 0.02 0.14 2.28 0.13 1.24 Control Delay 9.8 8.7 79.2 12.0 65.9 LOS A A F B F pproach Delay -- -- 58.1 65.9 pproach LOS -- -- F F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 21312005 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2009 - NO BUILD Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 5 620 21 40 993 49 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 720 24 46 1154 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 37 7 20 22 2 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 1 8 1 23 25 2 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR (vph) 5 46 51 23 28 C (m) (vph) 584 873 42 424 36 lc 0.01 0.05 1.21 0.05 0.78 95% queue length 0.03 0.17 4.97 0.17 2.78 Control Delay 11.2 9.4 360.7 14.0 248.6 LOS B A F B F -Approach Delay -- -- 252.9 I 248.6 [Approach LOS -- -- F F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 21312005 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/DEERFIELD DR 2009 - BUILD DIVERTED Project Description East/West Street: DEERFIELD DR/NOWLAND FARM RD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 5 621 22 33 994 49 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 722 25 38 1155 1 56 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR L TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 38 7 19 22 2 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 44 1 8 1 22 25 1 2 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR L LT R LTR v (vph) 5 38 52 22 28 C (m)(vph) 583 870 44 423 37 lc 0.01 0.04 1.18 0.05 0.76 95% queue length 0.03 0.14 4.94 0.16 2.73 Control Delay 11.2 9.3 340.3 14.0 237.6 LOS B A F B F Approach Delay -- -- 243.3 237.6 pproach LOS -- -- F F TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information A1/l1AB Ahin CAMAA Analyst GJR Intersection 1VIJYYL.1"1"" 1 n1.1V1 RD/VALE DR Agency/Co. FUSS & OWEILL urisdiction Date Performed 2/3/2005 Analysis Year 2004 - DECEMBER DATA Analysis Time Period 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-WestIStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 40 0 0 50 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 11 46 0 0 58 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 11 4 Capacity, cm (vph) 1555 1 1 865 /c ratio 0.01 0.00 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.01 Control Delay s/veh 7.3 9.2 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) 9.2 [Approach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information Site Information Analyst GJR Agency/Co. FUSS & OWEILL Date Performed 14:30 21312005 Analysis Time Period TO 5:30 PM Intersection NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2004 - ^^r, GE MgN-T44 bES/" /lou le Project Description EasUWest Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West I 5 Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 10 47 0 0 58 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 11 54 0 0 67 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- D -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 0 4 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 4 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 11 4 Capacity, cm (vph) 1544 847 /c ratio 0.01 0.00 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 9.3 LOS A A Approach delay s/veh 9.3 pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst GJR Agency/Co. FUSS & OWEILL Date Performed 2/3/2005 Analysis Time Period 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 - NO BUILD Project Description East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE IIntersection Orientation: East-West 5 Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 10 49 0 0 61 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h 11 56 0 0 70 3 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 LT TR LConlriguratioln: team Snal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 4 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 4 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I i LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 11 4 Capacity, cm (vph) 1540 841 /c ratio 0.01 0.00 Queue length (95%) 0.02 0.01 Control Delay s/veh 7.4 9.3 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) 9.3 pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000TM Copyright ©2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lGeneral Information ISite Information Analyst GJR Agency/Co. FUSS & O'NEILL Date Performed 14:30 21312005 Analysis Time Period TO 5:30 PM Intersection NOWLAND FARM RD/VALE DR Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 - BUILD DIVERTED Description IProject East/West Street: NOWLAND FARM ROAD North/South Street: VALE DRIVE Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 47 0 0 60 7 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h 6 54 0 0 69 8 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LT TR U stream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 6 0 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 6 0 1 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 6 7 Capacity, cm (vph) 1535 873 v/c ratio 0.00 0.01 Queue length (95%) 0.01 0.02 Control Delay s/veh 7.4 9.2 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) 9.2 pproach LOS -- -- A HCS2000rM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period GJR FUSS & O'NEILL 2/3/2005 4:30 TO 5:30 PM Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year SPEAR ST/PROPOSED SITE ROAD 2009 -BUILD DIVERTED Project Description East/West Street: PROPOSED SITE ROAD North/South Street: SPEAR STREET ersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 694 1 22 1135 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 806 1 1 25 1319 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 1 0 9 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT L R (vph) 25 1 10 C (m) (vph) 827 50 385 We 0.03 0.02 0.03 95% queue length 0.09 0.06 0.08 Control Delay 9.5 78.5 14.6 LOS A F B Approach Delay -- -- 20.4 pproach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved I II I _ I I I t t SITE ENGUIERR: MEAD0WO0D8 \ — — — \ DF4iVE \ P.C.Clyl485 SHELBUN6 A306462 E3. 1NC, P.O. BOAR SNEl3URNE, V7 J54R2 8f49ASP929 FAX r ;\ ` &02989-12I' wab: w.»v.cse-v[can nai I 1 \ I SCFV6*�.PJMASAV C1.6 EMT r I swT sMai Ft and i tnu- 'M PAVEMENT vrloTH 10' VHDE RECREATION PA- C1.4 - kPROJECT:l SAV ' Cl2 I 7 W1D,y�- GREEN PA _ _.._.., I - - - - -/.. f I SPEAR +A I - k Fi. EiooI,e T. L Fe15 n ' oldL F:IM, MEADOWS Btd .�teo-mzt+ °R� e I t,eo-ao2te Pic sew . -. mTG--Esk (( uvM.nd ewty CCIDOO I � �io���,r®®®r Ism ��l•� �-+mow>+"a" , hL _ ,�a'�.a. `l. �� �z•-.�,..�e�S�S .a �.F- m..�.'�3'"x +af. '9 _....,... ...v�..'T F �'iF;__:,.m. e y,_, < �>c1 • • —. — •N�N� pp QQ __ ___ SOUTEAST QUADRANT ,I f ry q� apovasen �.eeSS _ __ _ /�. ^ - _',� ''✓O E9 �ry� OVERLAY DISTRICT .,�-�. I ___ / '1 _' ')I.. O• v�,�'+� RESTRICTED AREA I _ � _ � I .� ZONING BOUNDARY aI — 26' PAVEMENTWDTlA _ V --i - /.\ C1 .J :"vc� s ^. LOT 19 _..... a,)y�snnc coNTCONTOUREE Vie- _ _ VIEW COgPoDOR 48GHT RESTRIC710N a 38.B FT • .' •� I I A Q;` I �. E' (AVERAGE PRE: CT HC NSm roN GRADE - 397.0 FEET) c,m,rn e�Pa�n \\. \` __ �___, LEI � �• ._��-� � f — � — —SS litANtt SEWER LINE �� �� I '� , I _ • W. and FA ammul \ \ —FM— FORCE MAIN Op/n BPBOi — — W — WATErt UNE 4 �� ,. .p a — —OE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC t KOpy RESTRICTED AREA ^ I� _ — 1 .' `\ —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - `_I — — — —UT— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ZONING BOUNDARY C GAO LMIE (1 etd Fwal I r 24-RAVI!MENT /� / QF7rI'elr leM-Nf]SO d —ST DRAINAGE LINE W10TH ///\\`� ^ OHO GGRAVIRAVITY SEWER CLEANOUT SEWER MANHOLE' Sf MANHOLE I � l�; f i• I i i l � hJ ,( ..` � ` � � � jjI- � 1 \ I i i ® e swT-aFr I , w ® CATCH BASIN I I \1. J IIj I I / YPOWER1� > / // //� , I I 1 I!v I I / \ \ /� ACLE l�-�.,�,.,-Y, EDGE OF WWOODS4' LWidDY6iap _ DRIVE r I , t I 1 I , nw mloh I f / commaAy I I d ea-o, alt .Y,// / f1 I TI I _ and A,L 11�/ IA De+rkx I I L_% R,,,na<EbSp�gq I I! 1,.— I I I J EL BHd T. moneM cir\ I I i I I I. - I f C1.1 �na , ` ` I I I I , I; 11 I I I I Leo 1 ! t 12/O/05 SAV FINAL PLAN OUBMITAL MASTER SITE PLAN I Q I I r I 2i r r r!l — av�"'.mu°k � \ �� // QJ // neTa nsn,lma N,nmeR I (T \� 1C1.5 I NOV., 2004 r eGus C1.0 022W CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Margareta Dencker 1430 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Kc� �. Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Illa M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, .1 0 aurosixe) BetsyJ1CDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Thomas & Louise Kleh 219 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. garg If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, r' Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Gary Farrell Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, J � Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held re the proposed development. regardi ng If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Me. onou h Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regardin the proposed development. g If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held. regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Me onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX.(802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295. Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONr 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you. aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy M Donough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURL.INGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Larkin/Milot Partnership P.O. Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 4P� \r � t\ ' �nc� dw Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Gary & Jane Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Robert & Marjorie Skiff 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 UVM & State Agricultural College 85 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cD1ii onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Douglas & Christine Fanzoni 14o6 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Michael & Mary Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you. may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. --------------------------- W W W W W W W W W W W1 OI W W W W W W W W W W W W W •Y W W W L - N �2 1 /L " IP 1 . O' AG W W W 3 51 E — _38 WETLAND BUFFER LD(7) I Lk 3 CR(8)I / \ PG(5)^ \ /PF\A � 1 SA T 2 "/ IPF '—A G A / I LOT ✓J4r I 2 / i NEW OR TRANSP CEDARt \ \ EXISTING \ \ CEDAR HEDGE SEE>�N11R1,110_1E SIG NTING PLAN I O\ 1 MMF GRAPHIC SCALE Q, 5 A G ` \ ( IN FEET) \ \ t inch = 30 ft MATCH LINE - SHEET L2 --= W W W W— W �� W �• -W- � �W= j� � , — LANDSCAPING LEGEND PROPOSED SHADE TREE ' TO(5) BUFF E R / -J WETS / CJ�7(lV. PROPOSED CONIFER TREE I r � LD(6) _ / /1(� PROPOSED SHRUB HOA LOT 2 / O PROPOSED EVERGREEN SHRUB POTENTIAL STORM WATER ' \ I/ / MANAGEMENT AREA \ MSC \\ HH \ JHB(7) \ SPRUCES � / —AF(7) � MIILbIba`D OUTLINE \ SPRUCES ae PG(9) / � I � / HH ... / \ SPRUCES / X.•• ENTRANCE SIGN PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" -1'-0' / LOT 20 EC / � 2�-` DR MAID — Appr-kid* k2' sP..r Meedovn -spear Bheat, tooth BurlNplal • PaminB Banal• SCALE: 1/2" = V - 0" City of ��4 �gtan Street`rp / f:ada I SnkkM'ao Name Camara Name Sne Nofm 16 AF ACER x hesmWl'AUum BipY Autumn MI 2. 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 BP BETULA fors P.P.Birch a-1d tM. B&B CLUMP 16 FP FRAXINUS anlca Paarnfe' Pabr_Aah 2.2.5"Cal. I B&B 5 1 GT GLEDITSIA tdcedws lnsrmis lldka' Halka ! 2.2.W C.I. B&B B OB OUERCUS boolor Sw WIWa Oak 2 - 2.S• Cd. B8B TREE FORM 13 OR GUERCUS nAra Rd Oak 2 - 2.S Cal. B8B TREE FORM / / � / Trap / Q I rj / Coda I Sci-000 Name Canmon Name Suz Nofee 13NAS ACER x heenwWAulumn Bias' Autumn Blain 2 - 2.S Col. Bab 5ACER a...h m'Green Mrxaxdn'reen Mounlln 2 - 2.5'Cal. %B f0BETULA a River Bird, a-1d HE BAB CLUMP 3BETUU f«e P Birch a-1d HL B&B CLUMP 1CRATAEGUS cru de Inermis'Cru:edef Crusader Hawthorn 2" Cal. BaB or Con[4GLEDITSIA tdcaldhos W—rde'Hdke' Helka Honeylocust 2. 2.S Cd. B&B 5aLARIX decidua Lsch a-S M. B&B COLLECTED1MAGNOLIA.1 I.ta'Cmennlal' CentennialM nolia 8-1d H1. B&B 20PICEAabie. — spn,ce aVHLBaB 63PICEA sum White 5. i''L B8B COLLECTED 7WERCUS bcdar Swarnp White Oak 2-2.5•Cd. I B&B TREE FORM 2 OR OUERCUS Mrs Rd Oak 2-2.8•Cd. I B&B TREE FORM 14 BA SAUX alba'Td:as' Gallen W Willow 1 ( i / Shrubs I / 1 I `32 I I S �C OM LappG�30MLad OMdw Code Sdenf/ao Nome Common Name Size Notm 42 CO CEPHALANTHUS oodeentalls Buttorbush 3d N3 Can. 10 CA CLETHRA ainddia Barr enw•ed Gray_ 30' ir5 C.L 67 CR CORNUS recerrroaa 3W M. B&S 30 IV ILEX—ticillete Win 9' B&B 7 Jt/0 JLINIPERDS twdzanla0s 5Fw Blue ChipJ-I 1S1C F1 COM. 10 JV JUNIPERUS vir 'niena OM' Oro OwI Juniper - - - w BBB as TO THt1JA occitlentdia Arborvitm a -Ir HE 898 COLLECTED 20 TON THUJA accident!!: N' d Dark Green Arborvitae Anowwod Vburnum _ _ American Cranberrybueh 5-6'1,111. BAB 14 VD VIBURNUM dmtatum 9.1' LL 888 or Coral. 6 VT VIBURNUM bilobm 3-4'.. B88a COM. 1 r-- I Persnnlale / I�J04 C OGS Cad. Sde fac Name Gammn N.me a:a Nao. @O�/L�� MM M(/L� M 18 HH DAYULV MIX' 1C 1 Gdkn 18' O.C. ra MUNU �/TOO`+`^r-DAYULV MIX TO BE EQUAL PARTS OF HEMEROCALLIS'Fl-d, Green Flutter', AND'HyW,-' Applicant: Eric Farrell�Iandscapearchitects.planning xlrt Afanla / mv�b March 29, 2005 SPEAR MEADOWS T n PO Box 1335` L�j Burlington, VT 05402 301 college street a burlingt0n a vermont a 05401 002 eB68 e3555 �"'n:lAvew.yboyle.com �—h �. 1 ^ = 30' / Landscape and Lighting Plan R. and M. Skiff Volume 143, Page 412 S08°03'16"E y -2. 5 ' A Gi \ 601 R TO NORTHERNF PARCELS TO(7) BN(3) — T«T)— I-IJ CR(6) QB(2) TO(7) M. and M. Scollins Volume 115, Pages 523-524 • 1. 1 1 � 1 Ir----1bb4T�t1R:€=�F#E€�rtT- � ��-__ . r _. GRAPHIC SCALE b ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 30 rt. { Applicant: Eric Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 IenEscape architects . planning consulterris 301 college street . burtington . vermont . 05401 802 .658 .:ii45 T. and L. Kleh Volume 175, Pages 163-164 Ma.NCh 29. 2005 1"=30' FM Z%PPR0O MG1d oOMILU M04 FM C OO H%UNU@yDOO M SPEAR MEADOWS FT n ndscane and Lir[htin¢ Plan 1/� C. Shand et al Volume 405, Pages 726- 728 S05.31'35"E 359.08' o a o OT - - 3�5 I OT I /0J LOT 16 I LOT 17 I LOT 18 I IV AF II II WRNESS PLANTINGS TO DELINEATE STORMWATE•••ddd��IFACILITY& LAND BUFFER WITH INTERMITTENT ��p^y'ryp�p'1IL FE ING — TO(5) '' W — — — _ IV Y M M -M- POTENTIAL STORM WATER LD CA(5) MANAGEMENTAREA a I HOALOTI �C W \Y\\� I DP4e) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W �\\.%\ \ ` ...� W W W W W W W W W W W/✓' W W WE9LAND . W W W W W W W W W W W \ W W W W W W W W W W W W •-(1W1/l]W W W W/ y\\ W� \W\�\W`� \W �. ... ... ... .. MATCH LJNE.- SHEET L4 GRAPHIC SCALE Nonni L— ( IN P'EE7' ) t Inch = 30 fL 20' Recreationlifl \ \ \\ \41 f\\,%ti \\ \ \\ , \\ \ \\`\ \ \ ` 4,1\\ \ \ \\ \ \\` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ Larkin 01�d� \,\ \� `\�Vol \ \\ \ \`\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ \ \\ \ `\ \\ \\\ `\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ �`\ \\\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \`\\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \`\ COO G3 LapMpG30O2�ILad OO Md�`I fvJOO 4 L�OO G3 c�oa�4a�c�400a Applicant: Eric Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlinaton. VT landscape architects . planning consultants 41 rnjb Maw 2g, 2005 SPEAR MEADOWS T �4 301 college street • burli Ion • vermont • 05401 802 •B68 ..3555 vw. oom 1• = 3d-( +� eg ng Landscape and Lighting Plan r,v I MATCH LINE — SHEET L3 IN. \ \ \\ \\ \\ ,. .\ �\ `�\\\ \\ `�\ `�\\�\ `�`� �\\ �\� N,\ \\\ \\ \ \\\ A \\ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WA. Q`F\�`y \l• \ .Y\ ]' \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 CR(5) 4 L4r.MA.YM ) / \ \ `�+l W •Y W W W W W W W W ^-110 [ iQZ \ \\ \ \t0\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\N,\\ \ \\ \1\y N. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ POTENTIAL STORM WATER --*-` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ MANAGEMENT AREA �o(e) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ y\\\ 3J\\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \♦ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \♦ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ `�\ N. \ , \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ M. Gilbert \\ \\ \\ \\ N. CR(5) \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ Pages 225-226 a l\ A \\ \ ` `\ \IN,\ \\ \\ \\ \ . `\` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ I.\, BP(5) `\ `\\ `\` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ `\` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ IN \. `\\ `N. \N. ,3 `; \ `;,� \ \ \ \ r \\ \\ \\ \. \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ ( INSTALL NEW FENCE ALONG I ` ` \ `\\ ` \ \ `\`,I \ ` `\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IN \ \ \ \ \ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \\ \ BOUNDARY ONVWNG PARCEL \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ IN `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \�\ `\ \ `\` \ \ `\` \ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ 'w \ `\ \ \ \ \1 \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ `N \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \` \\ \ \ \ \\ \• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ \ ` ` ` \P'� \ \ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 'f \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ ` \ \ \ \` \ \ \\\ O \\ \ \ \\ \\\` \�\ `\ \ \\ \ \�\" \\ \\ \\ \\ T \` \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ I VERGREEN ` \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ `\ \ \\ \ ` \\ \ \� \ `\ `\ \ SCREEN P \\ \ \ \ '\ \ \ \ \ `\ `\ \ I `\\ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ CANOPY \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` ` \ \ ` \ \`\ \ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ 1J \ \ \\ `\\ `\\ ` jV��s \ \ \ \� \\ \\ PG(70) \ \`\ \ \ \ \ \ `\\ \`\ " \ \ \ \ \ \`\ \ \ \` \\ \ `\ `\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ `\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ PA(10 \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \``N\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \` \ \ \\\ \\.\\ \ \ \ \ \jam\\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ \ ♦\ \\\ �\ ♦\ ♦\ \\ \\ \\ ♦\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ N. \, I 314 /P 10"\\ \\`\\ \ \\ `\\` \\ \\ \ \ N��23; \\ \\ \ \ `:\ - / I (Bent �426 \ \\\ \\ `� \ \ \\Ar \S) "\\\\ \ \ \ \\\\\\dsl\ \\ `\` \\ \ \\ \` \\ \` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ �1\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ `\ \\ \\ ` `\ ush \\ \. � ( L F .. \ \ \ \\ \ �4ER2i \\ ` \ \ ` ♦\ \\ \\\ I \ N. \\ \\� / I N \ \\\ \\\ \ \ \\ \\N.\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ BN \ \ \ \ \\ \ I. \\ \\ \ ,� ,; \ \\ \\ ,\ \\ ` \ \ \\ \\ \\ \` \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \. \\ \\ \\ \\ \. L_ I ,� \. �(1(...�..�...��\ .\.\....\.\... \ \ \\ NO�� � 19CGNNXI§ 1R N IA11,�M UNt I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \` ♦ \ `� ` ` \ \ ♦ ♦ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ \ \ `� \ \� \ \ \ \ . Bent\/ QQ "�, \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ J ( / I i\ \ . \\\: �_\� :..\. ,� . "....:..\ \... \ ♦ \ �.�B.UI`LgINGS\ IS S ON6YW Z�E UZUE§S1 ,f� IN' D \ \ \ ♦ \` ♦ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ ♦ ♦ \ \ `� \ `� \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ` \\ \ \�...\...: \ \\ \ ` `\ `\ \ \\ \� \\ \\ \ \\ \\\\\ \ \\ l �`6y\ "' ..�.. ". _ \ \ �ll(ISL BEREFJi�D 0RFIhk1,,AMKV \ -\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ \ I 1.0 AG I �\ " `\�,\`, \\ \\ \\ \ , \\ \\ \\, \\ \. \` \\ \`\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ I " \\ \\ \ , y \ \ \\ " ``\ ` �` \ \\ \`\ \\\ ;\ "\ ,� •.... e \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ IN \\\\ D. and L. V(a) \\ Young\� \. \\ \\ \\ \I Volume 412, T. and M. ` \\ \ , \`\`\\ " \\ \\ \ \ \\ \. \\ \ ` ; :; \` ; \\ \\ \ I \\\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ `�\ ` \\ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ a `\ \ \` ` \ \`\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\\ `�\ `\\ `�\ `\\�� \` \\ \�\ \\ \\ \ \ I Page 99 WulfSon 1\0/:eV \\ \\ \\0\I\ \ I �Q Q \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ Volume 565. ` `\` \ " \ `\\ `\`\ `\\ \ ` \ \ `\\ `\\ \`\ \ \ " \\ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ , \ ` ` \ ` \ \ \ IINI\ GRAPHIC SCALE ,\ " \`\ `\ \ " \ \ \ \ \` ` \ ` " \`� \ `\ \� \ \ \� \ ` \ \\ \ \ \\ \1\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 0 0 0 0 m Pages 349-35� \ \ \` ``\ : \ k \/\ \ \, " \�\ \ \�`B.�r;,� c�, \ \, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ �\ OG3 GQppG�30O �'ILad OO G�ld�`I \\ \\ \�. \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \x \\ \ \ \f \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �' \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 I (tr1 >*eer) I \` {I`� \ " �� \ `� \\1�`/\(�\\J/\IJ\\/Y[yx`�I� \ \�\]\1/.`'\\\ \\`\\`\\\\\ `v? \`\ \\ \ \ `\\`�`� \�`7j�1(^= M InI InII/1 �=rI� M I 1 Inch- 30 ft I ��\ \\I . \\ \\`� \\ `^f `^•'S l�,T ^.f \ \\`: . \\`\ `\\`�\` \ \\ \\\\\ \\\``\`\\\�\\`\ \�\\\`\\ \ \\\\\`\I \\` \�\�\ \ /( `\ \ VOLJV���V V LJ �OL1U -- - Applicant: Eric Farrell landscape architects .planning consultants I lei �Jb IoMaerCh 29, 20061 SPEAR MEADOWST PO Box1335 � L a„v rlinnfnn T nrdf» 1301 college street • burlington • vermont • 05401 e02 .t)ea .3555 1 onv.gboyI..mn = � , 1. = 39 / Landscape and Lighting Plan I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL DRAWINGS. 3. ALL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI) PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 4. NO PLANT SHALL BE PUT INTO THE GROUND BEFORE ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN FINISHED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT OR EQUAL. 5. ALL PLANTS SHALL BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THE PLANTS ORIGINAL GRADE BEFORE DIGGING. 6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER GROWN STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT 15 ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. 7. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER BALL SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE SURACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. I THE DAY PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES AND SHR UBS SHALL BE STAKED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUAL. 9. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTIDE551CANT WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. IN TEMPERATE ZONES, ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTIDE551CANT AT THE BEGINNING OF THEIR FIRST WINTER. 10. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER DETAILS AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. II. ALL PLANTS AND STAKES SHALL BE SET PLUMB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 12. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FILL AS PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. 13. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE WRING THE FIRST 24 14OUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL THEN BE WATERED WEEKLY, IF NECESSARY, WRING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. 14. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 15. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE PLANT LI5T FOR SEASONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE TIME OF PLANTING. Not to Scale 0 w w 0 fJ O 0 Ul CD 41 00 Not to Scale PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. INSTALL TREES AND STAKES PLUMB. USE WIDE BELT —TYPE TREE TIES; DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES. REUSABLE PERFORATED PLASTIC TREE WRAP (TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING). 3 2" X 2' HARDWOOD STAKES 1/3 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF 72'. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF 18-24' BELOW GRADE. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING.) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THI5 MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE). 21 FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK. 2' EARTH SAUCER. AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO 4". 2' EARTH SAUCER. CUT 4 REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, EXCEPT THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL. LEAVE NO BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1/2 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP 15 MADE OF NATURAL FIBER. IF BURLAP 15 PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS UNDER THE ROOT BALL. R PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD 4 CROS51NG BRANCHES TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SAME HEIGHT AS PREVIOUSLY GROWN. 2" FINE CHIPPED, PINE BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE AGAINST PLANT STEM. 2" EARTH SAUCER AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. REMOVE BURLAP FORM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. NEVER LEAVE BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE SOIL. IF CONTAINER GROWN, REMOVE POT COMPLETELY. LOOSEN ROOT MASS TO PREVENT GIRDLING. UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND diameter of root boll 1 IUL I I-7 I Not to Scale Applicant: Eric Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlinaton. VT 05402 STREET LIGHTING SCHEDULE: FIXTURE TYPE: PROV-P3 / 150 I1H / BLK POLE TYPE: DB6-4R14-125 QUANTITY: 26 ARCHITECTURAL ARIA LIGHTING WfWw.ai l.nel — PRUNE TO REMOVE DEADWOOD 4 GRO55ING BRANCHES. USE WIDE BELT TYPE TIES ON EACH MAJOR STEM. ALL MAJOR STEMS SHOULD BE BELTED TOGETHER DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES. ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THI5 MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE). 2'— 3" FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST STEMS. 3" EARTH SAUCER 2" X 2' X 18' HARDWOOD STAKES 3 PER TREE DRIVEN INTO GROUND. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING.) AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO t4•. UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED 501L MOUND CUT 4 REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, EXCEPT THAT WHICH 15 UNDER THE ROOT BALL. LEAVE NO BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1/2 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP 15 MADE OF NATURAL FIBER. IF BURLAP 15 PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH 15 UNDER THE ROOT BALL. landscape architects A planning consultants 301 college street a burlington . verrnont is 05401 802 .658.3555 • Die cull aluminum construction for roalon resi.0moe. • Tookless saws and removal of that reflector. lamp and ballast. • Type 2. 3, 4 and 5 full cutoff, horiaonl.l reRectms. • Type 3 and type 5 vortical lamp cutoff reftectors. • Asynalmbic and symmetric indiract, cutoff optical system. • 70 to 175 wait. HlD Including T8 CDM lamps and electron. b.lesls for Al h.lyde lamps • Separate die Cast aluminum ballast nodule for cooler eperillion And extended camponern life. • Powder coal finish in lan..nd"Id colors, win a polychrome primer. • Slips over a 4 x.h tenon for arm AT Dole —.1ollog. 14249 Auto— eouiavard • La Mirada, CA 00ese let (7141994 2700 - lag 1114) 094.0522 ,neaeewMAA.u. anN,,AmPAANca Al4Waal RTCEFI V/ JA6'n3v CRAVi of So. Burliil��:'vPl 3 times diameter of root Will Providence- Peplr a of s Welglre 20im PA: 1.311) +x 7nr4mn,m REFLECTOR MODELS - REFLECTORAAMP 1 M nppel lamp T.—M, snen M de .sal aluminum TM mt.n. roll-u, module a sealed I-o Ina... housing w. A m.ded Rkc gesk. The imparts g.,A lens —11 ba sealed 10 Its nouskg wTh A AIhcole gasket (Me SMAn— steal Au., she" ,ukase Ina door 10 saw ecv:ass Ihp lamp Its mxe.p mWuk Anal. he Composts of tac.ed. —.,A, AM —1 eMcWer .—use aluminum panes rgdly anached m A as, r- aluminum hoosmg. Th. non«Grit shall lea moved .1-1-,A by kn.g n out of me bur ap,l,g boded PAR!%. The r~or tray snap As ratable on W -Is or alemug Ise IugM deh—on Tne ro,lrnmal all vertMal kmp lien«tors snen meet ANshles standards ar Iwl c.on MAl "'Mo. REFLECTOR MODELS BALLAST This lo", talhim ndrA'g.ball As se call aluminum This tool Wane. access Io, eerv.ng is «romp.... by A puatAn Gum monon of Its top cove, The b.kho mall be moused on A ph —red gay wnn a WICk dac.nne. PA19 ans,hed io Ina und.... of Ina mbar. HID ballast" are Ago ,owe, factor ,sled b, 30'1` sta urg. Electronic ballasts 10, lino.11..e A_. are wand ,else A. Rockets A,.. —..A WECURCATIONS base for ED17 lamps. 012 An use wnn Te anal AM eock.s are WI50 raced WMA.An. ealleels ale mull cap, wired el Its Mr., far 217 robs comps. run escenl lmnstormera shun Aae,A 120 t0 277 van mpul and rated for 0-F .anirg. INDIRECT MODELS - LOWER U MP MODULE M 1— I 11, on co.am Ina amp nodulethe rnver .ban be d. — Ah, cam won A tempered glass lens PAI lamp shall ne «ceAAed by uArkg iba lamp Musing cover A Wed., lure. tlra r.le.a shall W WIMAAAI a —I. AAAM"An wnn an eeh—ly na ew beam lot'i—og ma ki This roper MIAAWM Socks are madam A. tali ED-17 el or G12 br use wAh T6 uampa. An sockelS ere pulse late.lo calaln. INDIRECT MODELS - UPPER REFLECTOMALLAST Ina de cell .—A.. upper nou.,g shah conlak, me haws! amaly and Ih. -h— Mt— Tn, 1.11Ass balls. ass far A«vbdg Is eaanpnshed "AM). In up latch Aro hinged top corer. Tro belled shall Is, mounted on a peened tray w4h A WKk 0—Inect plug_ rM HID WlN are ngh power ta.or, rated for -30" .adng B.hs.s era mub up, wired At the I-" for V1 von.. Ina Ins— ratted., is mounted to'ba rrdersae o"be upper nma.rg. Its MI4 Anent ba die cast.umiMM, l h.din A hgn mf o,,ahce -AA Tbe i,.krecl AM —A snap ba IES.Iris.¢. A. anon wnn less than 11 lumen 1" .bore 90 degree.. INSTALLATION A MOUNTING The Providolttw SIGMA "I ba la.ory supplied As A comp... p—W assembly The finer .ban slip ova 4-mVan en lop Pais a ann Andre be •ead and r a levele0 ..In I.A. AT_`AAA.eel .el --- FINISH F M mush mn.Als of A Nn AIAgn pm MetneM roglm.n wAb A poMnor no— s..ar. oven ary on and Ion —bad wM a Ihemosel s TGIC poly—, WAw wAI finM Tne In- snaN ,noel the AAMA V5 2 pado,mance sp« IA,Aden which includes Passing A 300p lour soh .pay test or cormslun resistance. CERTIFICATNx4 IIre riatura— M "Also w., ETL br ppdoor. wet bC.Ion use. ULt 1911 all Canada, CSA SM ('.22 2 no — .P.h5 Meda in its USA —All Ty 1,lure Alias As w.ra..d b, In— veal.. Bella. coMoune,tls Carry Its balk. man.'Ach—S kmned wananly. ARCNITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 14249 Ane.ia Boulevard • La Mirada, CA Sol let (714) 904-2700 - lap (714) 9941 www.aal.nat P,awA�..,..r..Mr,.n.,..wnu. o.w,nA«na•,w.,. mra+Wws PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. INSTALL TREES AND STAKES PLUMB, USE WIDE BELT —TYPE TREE TIES; DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES. ATTACH AT 2/3 HEIGHT OF TREE. 3 — 2' X 2' HARDWOOD STAKES 1/3 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF 6'. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF IB-24' BELOW GRADE. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING.) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING 501L FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE). 2"— 3" FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK. 3' EARTH SAUCER. AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES. SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO 4' UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND. CUT 4 REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, EXCEPT THAT WHICH 15 UNDER THE ROOT BALL. LEAVE NO BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURFACE. REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1/2 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP 15 MADE OF NATURAL FIBER. IF BURLAP 15 PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH 15 UNDER THE ROOT BALL. Not to Scale FOR LA\PPU2@wLa1L @HLW H@U [F@12 003unugu0m I—A� jb IMar„ch29,2005 SPEAR MEADOWS FL6 1—.1lboirle.com .. _ AS NOTED Planting Notes and Details D �rnect 214 Meadowood Drive S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dec. 15, 2003 Charles Hafter, City Manager 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dear Chuck, I've become quite involved as a spokesperson for many neighbors regarding the proposed Farrell development off Spear St. I want to share with you several of my related experiences, some rewarding, and some very frustrating, and some suggestions for process improvement. The Development Review Board chaired by John Dinklage provides an excellent forum for citizen input, and the Board goes out of its way to hear and address everyone's concerns. The members are well- informed, thoughtful, and dedicated. It is disillusioning to learn that the DRB has very limited discretion in assessing the merits of proposals. The first two sketch plans submitted by the Farrells were frankly offensive to the neighbors, and in the judgment of many, to the Board and City as well. That the Board has no authority to weigh esthetics in its deliberations is a flagrant flaw in the system. A fifth grade student could do the math to determine conformity with setbacks and housing density —the Board should be empowered to insist that the development be visually pleasing and compatible with adjacent houses, and not stand as a permanent monument to greed and poor taste. As you know, the abutters of this putative development have expressed a strong interest in attempting to raise the money to purchase this land, in conjunction with UVM. The newly -formed S. Burlington Land Trust has enthusiastically supported this idea, and their involvement in such a project could greatly raise their visibility in the consciousness of City residents. UVM (through Ian DeGroot ,VP for Community Development) has expressed a keen desire to sit down with the interested parties to see if such an acquisition could be worked out. They are very interested in possibly consolidating some of their farming operations in that area. This outcome would seem to reward everybody. Unfortunately, such a transaction apparently does not appear lucrative enough to the Farrells; they haven't had the courtesy to even respond to our inquiry. This situation highlights several procedural steps that beg for revision. The abutters, with few exceptions, first learned of the proposed development when the developer sent us a sketch plan and invited us to an informational session. At that point we reacted very quickly in mobilizing the neighbors, the Land Trust and UVM- but it was very likely already too late. Unless the DRB determines that the development's impact on Spear St. traffic would be unacceptable (at the proposed housing density it would be, in our judgment), and that it must be delayed until/unless access can be secured through the Isham property onto Meadowood Drive, then all our efforts will have been futile. All the abutting neighbors should have been notified in writing by the city, when the development proposal was first submitted to the City. If the Land Trust is to have real impact in the City, then it should ideally be given the right to negotiate for select properties before the owner can apply for development. More than one person has related to me a perceived indifference by the City administration toward the Land Trust's interest in the Farrell land. I would like to ask (seriously, not rhetorically) whether the City is more interested in preserving select land tracts, or in building more houses and expanding its tax base. We would not expect the Trust to contribute financially to this project -only to lend their knowledge, enthusiasm and tax-exempt status. Finally, the comments of several concerned and thoughtful Vail Drive residents made clear that promulgation of the right-of-way at the north end of their street was de facto woefully inadequate. Similarly, I and many Meadowood Drive residents who often walk there regarded the curb cut at the far (northern) side of the cul-de-sac as an indicator that the development would forever terminate there. The Board's admonition that we "should have known" was not persuasive. If Vail Drive should become a through street to Spear St., its residents will rightfully feel betrayed, and the City might have difficulty defending against a legal challenge. I have a suggestion to avoid such problems in the future: all existing and future developments which contain such right -of —ways should have laminated sketch plans posted at the appropriate locations, so that all interested neighbors and potential buyers will be properly informed. The minimal cost should be borne by the developers. The involvement of Lou Bresee and his Recreation Committee was greatly appreciated. They did secure a recreation easement along the eastern boundary of the land, where the neighbors requested it. Unfortunately this may prove to be a hollow victory, since in the present plan a road courses along the western side of the path, and the views of the Adirondacks will be all but eliminated by the closely -packed houses. Most of the abutting neighbors (including Gary Farrell) purchased their homes at a time when this land was zoned for only two houses. When the zoning was changed, we were confident that the Zoning Board (and now the DRB) would exercise due discretion in reviewing any proposal to develop this field, and ensure that any such project be in harmony with the adjacent properties. That the Board has no such power undermines their qualifications and integrity, and betrays the neighbors. Should this proposal proceed, an entire neighborhood of long-standing City residents and taxpayers will have had their properties devalued, all for the gain of a single family. On behalf of many families on Meadowood Drive, Spear Street, Pinnacle Drive and Vail Drive, I urge you to review these suggestions with the appropriate City officers and committees. We realize that it is difficult to balance the needs for development and for land preservation, and very much appreciate your time and consideration. We hope you and your family have a happy holiday season! Sincerely, Michael J. Scollins CC: John Dinklage, DRB Chair Lou Bresee, Recreation Cmte Chair Sarah Dopp, Land Trust interim Chair Rick Whittlesey, atty Neighbors State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD March 22, 2006 Brent Farrell et al 1350 Spear Street South Burlington VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 RE: WW-4-2587, Spear Meadows combine 3 pre-existing lots and subdivide into 20 lots; Lots 1-18 each for a proposed 4 bedroom single family residence, Lot #20 with an existing single family residence and Lot 19 for proposed 12 duplexes with a total of 36 bedrooms located on Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on March 16, 2006, including a fee of $7290.00 paid by check #1094. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. 1. Please submit 2 site plans with all the boundary line dimensions. 2. Please submit mailing addresses for all the landowners. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Wastewater Management 6"Xt o Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Stephen A. Vock ACT 250 NOTICE APPLICATION AND HEARING #4C1173 10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6092 On March 14, 2006, Spear Meadows, LLC filed application #4C1173 for a Project described as: The subdivision of three existing parcels totaling 26.2 acres, into 18 new single family lots, one existing single family residence, and a multi -family lot for 12 duplex units. This permit does not authorize construction of any of the new single family residences or the multi -family units. Permit amendments will be required for this construction. This Project includes construction of a new 2300 ft. public access road, which will connect Vale Drive to Spear Street. There will also be a new 1000 ft. road and cul de sac serving the multi -family lot. The Project is located on Spear Street, just south of the Swift Street intersection, in the City of South Burlington. This Project will be evaluated by the District 4 Environmental Commission in accordance with the 10 environmental criteria of 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a). A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, April 19, 2006 at 4:00 p.m. at the Essex Junction District Office of the Agency of Natural Resources, 111 West Street, Essex Junction, Vermont. A site visit will be held immediately before the hearing at 3:00 p.m. at the site. We will meet at 1350 Spear Street for the site visit. The following people or organizations may participate in the hearing for this project: 1. Statutory parties: The municipality, the municipal planning commission, the regional commission, any adjacent municipality, municipal planning commission or regional planning ion if the project lands are located on a town boundary, and affected state agencies. 2. Adjoining property owners: May participate to the extent they can demonstrate that the oposed project will have a direct effect on their properties under the ten criteria of Act 250 pursuant to 10 .S.A. § 6085(c)(1) and Environmental Board Rule 14(A)(5). 3. Other persons or organizations: May participate pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(A)(6) at the discretion of the District Environmental Commission. If you wish further information regarding participation in this hearing, please contact the District Coordinator at the address below before the date of the first hearing or prehearing. If you have a disability for which you are going to need accommodation, please notify this office at least seven days prior to the above hearing date. Copies of the application and plans for this project are available for inspection by members of the during regular working hours at the South Burlington Offices, the Chittenden County Regional ng Commission Office, and the District #4 Environmental Office. The application can also be I at the Natural Resources Board web site: www.nrb.state.vt.us/lup by clicking on "District fission Cases" and entering the case number above. at Essex Junction, Vermont this is day of March, 2006. Y Stephanie A. Hesson Natural Resources Board District #4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802.879.5662 E/ stephanie.hesson@state.vt.us 1173.not CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 15 day of March, 2006, a copy of the foregoing ACT 250 NOTICE OF APPLICATION & HEARING #4C1173, was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to: I PARTIES: Spear Meadows, Inc. 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 90 Kimball Avenue, Suite 206 South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency',of Natural Resources 103 South Main St. - Center Bldg., 3rd Floor Waterbury, VT 05671-0301 IFOR YOUR INFORMATION District #4 Environmental Commission Thoma's Little, Chair/Gene Richards/Chuck Dunham 1°11 West Street =` EssexJunction, VT 05452 vita Robinson )epartment of Libraries 109 State Street Montpelier, VT 05609-0601 JRCS, District Conservationist JSDA Soils Conservation Service 1193 S'.'Brownell Road, Suite 35 Nilliston, VT 05495-7416 Page 2/COS/#4C1173 Tom Bushey, District Supervisor, N.R.C.D. 48 Bushey Road Shelburne, VT 05482 County Forester/Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 John M. Austin/ANR, Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 5 Perry Street, Suite 40 Barre, VT 05641-4266 Burlington Free Press/Classified Ad Section 191 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Christopher Owen/Vt. Dept. of Public Service 112 State Street, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Michael Russom/Vermont Gas Systems PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Division for Historic Preservation National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620 ames B. McCarthy, Engineering Services/VTrans )ne National Life Drive, Drawer 33 lontpelier, VT 05633 larian White, Policy Analyst/Vt. Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets 16 State Street, Drawer 20 lontpelier, VT 05620-2901 ian Gaherty/Efficiency Vermont 55 South Champlain Street urlington, VT 05401 lichael Barsotti, Water Quality Director/Champlain Water District 03 Queen City Park Road outh Burlington, VT 05403 latt Strassberg 77 Paddy Hill Road loretown, VT 05660 Page 3/COS/#4C1173 ADJOINING LANDOWNERS On File at District Commission Office Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 15 day of March, 2006. WAAct250\ADMIN\CS\4C1173cs.wpd Arisne ommo Natural Resources Board Technician 879-5660 :CITY OF SOUTH B URLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANN➢I4G & ZONEgG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURL.INGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 18, 2005 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Re: Minutes Dear Eric: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the May 3, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sir".rely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 4. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-28 of Provost Real Estate, i.LC and Robert & Joyce Snyder for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) subdividing a 1.02 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two lots of 0.27 acres and 0.75 acres, 2) subdividing a 0.50 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two 0.25 acre lots, 3) combining the undeveloped 0.25 acre lot with the adjacent 0.75 acre lot to create a 1..0 acre lot, and 4) constructing two two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot, and 4) constructing two two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot, 10 and 14 Shunpike Road: Mr. Homsted said there have been no changes since Preliminary Plat. They have worked out all issues with the Fire Chief and City Engineer. They will have a fire hydrant in the development and partially sprinkler buildings (near the furnaces on the lower level). Mr. Boucher moved to approve final plat application #SD-05-28 of Provost Real Estate, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-29 and Final Plat Application #SD-05-30 of Anthony Basiliere for a planned unit development to subdivide a 0.26 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings into two lots of 0.13 acres each, 21 and 23 Meadow Road: Mr. Basiliere noted this started as 2 houses on 1 lot. They want to sell one off, and the only way they can do this is as a PUD. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-29 and Final Plat Application #SD-05-30 of Anthony Basiliere subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: Master Plan Application #MP-05-01 and Preliminary Plat Application for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two single-family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six two-family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell said the plan is the same as at Sketch Plan Review. Two lots have existing single family homes. The road intersects Spear and connects to Vale Drive. They are talking with UVM about connecting water, but CWD would prefer they connect at one of the private homes. The applicant will talk with CWD about this. -2- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 Landscaping has been done to please neighbors. Buildings are not yet designed. Mr. Dinklage asked if there will be open areas owned in common. Mr. Farrell said there will be 3 lots which will basically represent stormwater management lots. He showed these on the plan. They will be owned in common and will be the responsibility of the association to maintain. The developer will rebuild the cul de sac at the end of Vale Drive. There will just be a straight thru street. Mr. Dinklage felt that neighbors on Vale Dr. should be made aware of this. Mr. Farrell said Public Works wants the cul de sac eliminated. The applicant will also remove the curb. The city will still own the circle. Mr. Cimonetti noted this area is a "blend point" for the rec path. He felt special consideration will be needed as rec path traffic will be mixing with road traffic. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to meet with the Rec Path Committee to see how this can best be done. He felt signage should be included in the plan. Mr. Farrell showed the 3 stormwater management areas. After water is treated, it goes back into the drainage way. The areas may be fences for safety. Mr. Kleh reminded the applicant that he had agreed to build screening for headlights. Mr. Farrell said they do agree to do that, possibly with a hedge. Mr. Dinklage asked that this be worked out with the Arborist and neighbors. A resident expressed concern that this will be done and noted some things the Golf Course people agreed to do were never done. Mr. Dinklage said if it appears on a plan, the city can enforce it. Mr. Cimonetti noted the Rec Path Committee is pleased with the location of the path. He noted the Committee is talking with UVM regarding having the ability to extend the path. Ideally, they would like the path separated from the street by a green strip, but they don't want to disturb the tree -line. Mr. Robertson noted that Bruce Hoar wants 5 ft. between the street and the path. That is in the draft motion. Ms. Muhr asked if consideration has been given as to when the rec path exits onto Spear St. She suggested crosswalks. Mr. Dinklage suggested a pedestrian light/signal. Mr. Farrell noted the wetlands are all Class 2 and they will need permits to cross. He would like a 24 ft. crossing. The rest of the road will be 26 ft. or more. Members wanted the road as narrow as possible in the wetland. Mr. Dietrich then presented his traffic study. Traffic was counted at Nowland Farm Rd, Spear St. and Cedar Glen. They did a 5-year projection and added in all programmed development. During the afternoon peak hour (4:30-5:30 p.m.), they estimate a total of 33 trip ends. Based on other counts, 70% of traffic would go north to Dorset St., 10% south. It is assumed that Vale Drive traffic would go out through this site. -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 Mr. Dietrich said this will improve the level of service at Nowland Farm Road in the morning. There is adequate sight distance at the driveway, but they recommend the hedges be cut back. The left turn lane need is a "grey area." Mr. Cimonetti noted that when Pinnacle was put in, Spear St. was widened within the city right-of-way. Long-time property owners have fences right on the city line. This "killed" the rec path there. The proposed plan comes out at the Bailey house with a white picked fence. Mr. Cimonetti felt the rec path issue has to be solved there so a cyclist isn't faced with cars. Members want a left turn lane and the rec path. The draft motion was amended as follows: • Stipulation # 10 was added to read: The site plan review shall be required only for lot #19. • Previous stipulation #10 becomes #11. • Stipulation 2f was added to read: The plan shall be revised to remove the proposed buildings on Lot # 19. • Stipulation #7 was amended to add the words "duplex units" to the first line. • Stipulation 2g was added to read: The plan shall be revised to show a southbound left turn lane at the project entrance on Spear Street. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve Master Plan MP-05-01 and Preliminary Plat application as amended above. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan Application #SD-05-13 of .I.G. Architects to amend a previously approved plan for a 2554 sq. ft. auto service and repair facility. The amendment consists of constructing a 2344 sq. ft. addition, 11 Commerce Avenue: Mr.- Goodrich said they want to add on to the back and side of the building. A Class 3 wetland strip will. be eliminated. The Natural Resources Committee is OK with this. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application 4SD-05-13 of J.G. Architects subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. APPLICATION for MASTER PLAN REVIEW Permit Number MP - p - (> All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being deemed incomplete, and a delay in scheduling for the Development Review Board. Owuer,gf Record Name as own on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Location of Last Recorded Deed (Book and page #) \fie App4cant�legal interest in the property (i.e. fee simple, option, etc.) Contactperson (Name_ma}ling address, phone, fax & e-mail) Project street address:�,�' �( Tax parcel ID # (Assessor's office) ;`eCV' ed Project description Proposed uses on property (please describe the size or nwnber of units_ and nature of all proposed uses) M (Y-W �1(`011,P + (W[ b Maximum total number of residential units and/or square fool developed, including anv existijug units axed/or uses to remain: of uses to APPLICATION for MASTER PLAN REVIEW Maximum ]�r��osed building hei lit (if applicable) • C11 ' ( �i�l 3� � 0►1 l�-�°i ��.10 ,U Proposed phasing lease describe the number of total phases and, if applicable at this time, the number of units or SF of uses to be proposed in the first phase): MASTER PLAN UMBRELLA CRITERIA Total acreage of involved property(ies) A0 Total acreage of first phase for development (if known at this time) Total number of residential units and/or SF of all uses requested + Existing impervious coverage, entire site (SF and %) n ,-10/0) Maximum proposed impervious coverage, entire site (SF and %) aDw-o baoio) Maximum existing building coverage, entire site (SF and %) q a- ( b C))O Maximum proposed building coverage, entire site (SF and %) C -110 Estimated number of existing PM peak hour vehicle trip ends Maximum proposed number of PM peak hour vehicle trip ends Existing or proposed encumbrances on property (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Y\C-IV Proposed extension, relocation or modification of municipal facilities (sanitary sewgr, water supply, streets,, stormw4ter1 etc. - please describe brkefly. _ Owners of record of all contiguous properties, and mailing addresses (please attach list) Estimated final project completion year APPLICATION for MASTER PLAN REVIEW Plans and Fee Please submit plans showing the information listed in Section 15.07(C)(3) of the Land Development Regulations. Five full-sized and one reduced size copy (11x17) of the plans must be submitted. The application fee for Master Plan review is $500, plus $10 clerk's fees ($510). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Applicant Signature of Property Owner Please do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION I have reviewed this application and find it to be: 8_ COMPLETE ❑ INCOMPLETE & Zoning or designee Date OWNER OF RECORD Parcel A -1302 Spear Street - Gary N. Farrell Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 802-660-7526 Parcel B -1340 Spear Street - Parcel C -1350 Spear Street - Brent Farrell 18 Irish Road Cambridge, VT 05444 802-849-9767 Brenda F. Cole 100 Chelsea Place Williston, VT 05495 802-879-3284 Karen Maklad 111 Goodridge Drive Williston, VT 05495 802-878-4460 Kevin Farrell 152 Cedar Avenue Arlington, MA 02476 781-641-4516 Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-5822 LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED Parcel A - Vol. 677 Pages 402 Parcel B - Vol. 274 Pages 440-443 Vol. 274 Pages 280-282 Parcel C - Vol.142 Pages 45-47 CONTACT PERSON Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Eric Farrell efarrel] Og,farrellrealestatevt.coin 658-7400 x25 TAX PARCEL ID# Parcel A -1640 - 01302 R Parcel B -1640 -1340 Parcel C -1640 - 01350 R Liz Miller emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com 658-7400 x14 SIGNAfT^1ES OF E Gary N. Farfell -1302 Spear Street Brent Farrell -1340 Spear Street Brenda F. Cole -1340 Spear Street Karen Makla -1340 Spear Street Gary Spear Street Jane . Farrell -1350 Spear Street SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 3 0� Brent Farrell for Spear Meadows, Inc. FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters September 3, 2003 Parcel Number Name & Address 1742-00033 R Larkin / Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00089 R Robert A. & Marjorie N. Skiff 89 Springhouse Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. & Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 0570-01225 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. & Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01302 R Gary N. Farrell (1302 Spear Street) Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle @ Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. & Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01331 R Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01393 R William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01404 R Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Mar 23 05 10:53a CivEngineering 88F" 7271 p.1 928 P-alls Road Phone- X02-995-2323 F.U. I3ox 485 Fax-, 802-985.2271 Shcll,urne, VT 05482 h-Mail: mailCNcea-vt_Conx March 28, 2005 Mr. Eric Farrell Redstone Commercial Group 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Spear Mcadows - So. Burlington Dear Eric: As you are aware, the Spear Meadows project has been evaluated for wetlands, and Errol 13ri.ggs' and Axt Gilman's delineation is shown on our site plan_ The roadway and lot layout was designed to minimize impacts of the wetlands. In evaluating the project with regard to the, City of 5o. Burlington's Surface Water Protection Standards, I offer the following response to Article 12 (3) a and b: Article 12 - 3 a. With the exception of the roadway crossing the existing wetland drainage ditch, the proposed project will not have any direct impact on the wetlands_ T'he crossings will have calvcrts that will allow the drainage system to operate as it presently exists_ Article 12 - 3 b. In addition to maintaining the existing drainage pattern and on -site treatment, there will be three stormwater management areas constructed to meet the State Stormwater Quality Standards. (i'you shou)d have any questions, please contact me at your convenience_ Stephen A. VockC F T,:. SAV:pao Received 11ar-29-2005 10:57am From-985 2271 To-REDSTONE Page 001 FARRELL REAL ESTATE CO. P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell y% Date: 3/ 29/ 2005 Re: Spear Meadows Subdivision Enclosed please find materials intended to represent a complete application for "Master Plan' and "Preliminary Plat" reviews of the above referenced project by the Development Review Board. The plans depict conceptual locations of homes on the 17 proposed single-family lots (2 -18) and six duplex buildings (12 units) on lot 19. Lots 1 and 20 have existing single-family home thereon, which will remain. We intend to return at a future date, under a separate application, if required, to present final landscape and building plans for the development of the 12 units on Lot 19. The following materials are included in connection with this application: 1. APPLICATION FOR MASTER PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT) REVIEW 0 Application Fee in the amount of $2,510.00 • List of Owners of Record and Last Recorded Deeds • List of Contact Persons and Parcel ID# • Signature Page of Owners and Applicant • List of Abutters 2. Complete Engineering Plans as prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. (Five sets at 24" x 36" and one set at 11" x 17") • Cover Sheet • Drawing Numbers S 1.0 -1.1 • Drawing Number CLOA 1 • Drawing Numbers C 1.0 -1.8 • Drawing Numbers C 2.0 - C 2.4 • Drawing Numbers C 3.0 - C 3.3 3. Complete Landscape Plans as prepared by TJ Boyle & Associates (Five sets at 24" x 36" and one set at 11" x 17") • Drawing Numbers L1- L6 4. Landscape Budget as prepared by TJ Boyle & Associates 5. Traffic Report as prepared by Fuss & O'Neill 6. Letter from Wetlands Consultant re Wetland Classification 7. Letter from Civil Engineer re Wetland Encroachments 8. Spear Meadows Subdivision - Lot Acreage The following is intended to address Section 15.18(A) General Standards of the Land Development Regulations. Subsections (1) through & The project Engineer has reviewed these sections of the Regulations and produced plans that meet or exceed the applicable requirements. Subsections ( through (2) The plans have been submitted to the Fire Chief for his review and comment. Provisions have been made to allow connectivity to abutting (undeveloped) lands. The roadway designs were reviewed by the Public Works Director prior to final design and are subject to final comments by the City Engineer. Subsection (10) The plan, as proposed, is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The following is intended to address Section 15.18(B) Southeast Quadrant District of the Land Development Regulations. Subsections (1) through (4) The project Engineer has reviewed these sections of the Regulations and produced plans that meet or exceed the applicable requirements. 0 Page 2 Subsection (5) All of the soils on the property fall into the following four soils types: Covington Silty Clay (Cv); Georgia Stony Loam (Ge); Livingston Clay (Lh); and Vergennes Clay (Ve). These soil types have Agricultural Value Group ratings of 6 or 7. Soils that are rated 1-2-3 are considered "prime ag"; soils that are rated 4-5-6-7 are considered "statewide'; and soils that are rated 8-9- 10-11 are considered "not rated". Therefore, under the state rating system, the project does not have any prime ag soils. Subsection (6) The overall plan reflects three Home Owners Association (HOA) lots that comprise a total of 5.85 acres of contiguous open space within the development. The delineated wetlands on the property are completely contained with these lots, as well as three storm water retention ponds that provide management and treatment functions for the discharges from the storm water collection system serving the development. The retention ponds are outside of the wetlands and associated buffer areas. The natural drainage flow from south to north across and through the property will be uninterrupted, despite the development. A formally organized HOA will be responsible for protecting and maintaining these valuable areas and infrastructure, in perpetuity, for the benefit of the neighborhood and the environment. Subsection (7) The project Engineer has reviewed these sections of the Regulations and produced plans that meet or exceed the applicable requirements. The following is additional information intended to address miscellaneous areas of the Land Development regulations and to answer questions contained on the Master Plan and Prelimina .� Plat application forms. Section 9.04(A) Restricted Areas We hereby request a waiver allowing development in the Restricted Area that runs along the easterly side of Spear Street, as depicted on the Southeast Quadrant Official Zoning Map, specifically to allow development on proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3. This was discussed at several Sketch Plan review meetings before the DRB, at which time they approved the concept of a waiver, in consideration, in part, of the removal of two existing curb cuts at 1302 and 1350 Spear Street and the fact that there are several neighboring properties, north and south of the project, that are also developed with the Restricted Area. Section 12.02(E) Wetlands The wetlands on the property have been delineated by WM. D. Countryman, Environmental Assessment and Planning, of Northfield, Vermont and are noted on the various engineering plans submitted. All building lots have been established outside of the delineated wetland and associated buffer areas, which are contained within three lots to be commonly owned and maintained by • Page 3 the landowners association. The boundary lines of these areas will be marked by new plantings and fencing. As referenced in a letter to me from Errol C. Briggs, Wetlands Consultant, dated December 9, 2004, the wetlands on the southerly end of the property are designated Class II by virtue of their connection to certain Class I1 wetlands located on other property to the south and the wetlands on the northerly end of the property are designated Class III, because they are disconnected by uplands from the Class II wetlands and do not otherwise meet the standards for being classified as Class II. The project roadway has been intentionally located so as to cross the Class II wetlands at its narrowest possible point, providing access to Lot 19, and the main roadway coming in from Spear Street has been intentionally located so as to cross the Class III wetlands at its narrowest possible point. The roadway crossing profiles have been designed to minimize any impacts on the wetlands and to maintain natural drainage flows. Please let me know if you require any additional information or clarification. Otherwise, we ask that you schedule us before the DRB for a Master Plan/Preliminary Plat review at its earliest convenience. Enclosures 0 Page 4 I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: April 27, 2005 WrMsubWarrehmaster preliminary.doc Application received: March 30, 2005 FARRELL — 20- LOT SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN APPLICATION #MP-05-01 Agenda #7 -Meeting Date: May 3, 3005 Applicants/Owners Owners Eric Farrell Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell, et al. PO Box 1335 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05402 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information T.J. Boyle Associates Tax Parcel 1050-66000-R 301 College Street SEQ District Burlington, VT 05401 ± 26.1 Acres Location Ma 7 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master preliminary doc Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking master plan approval and preliminary plat approval for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board reviewed the initial sketch plans for the proposed project at the meeting on April 20, 2004 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 30, 2005 and have the following cqn^" — Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Zoning District Required Proposed �l Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 15,539 SF (Lot # 7) Max. Density 1.2 units/acre 1.19 units/acre �l Max. Building Coverage 15% 6.7% �l Max. Overall Coverage 30% 22% �l Min. Front Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 10 ft. Jrq Min. Rear Setback 3�ft��J 30 ft. Max. Building Height 4<40 ft. �l zoning compliance Master Plan Approval: Pursuant to Section 15.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant requires a master Plan approval. The proposed project does involve the development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant, so a separate master plan review shall be performed for the proposed project. MASTER PLAN CRITERIA The following information was relied upon in making this decision pursuant to Section 15.07(C)(3) of the Land Development Regulations: a. An accurate Master Plan has been submitted. b. The title block is "Spear Meadows —Spear Street— South Burlington, Vermont." CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master preliminary doc c. The plans were prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.; T.J. Boyle Associates; William D. Countryman; and Fuss and O'Neill. d. A list of abutters, dated September 3, 2003, was provided with the application. e. The Master Plan application and the plans referenced in (b) above include the following information: i. The combined area of the property subject to the Master Plan is 26.1 acres. ii. The plan indicates that 20.25 acres (Lots #1-20) are proposed for development and 5.85 (HOA Lots #1-3) acres are proposed for open space. iii. Public amenities and facilities indicated on the plans include public streets, a public water system, a public sewer system, and a public recreation path. iv. The maximum overall coverage proposed for the property is 22% (30% permitted). The maximum building coverage proposed for the entire property is 6.7% (15% permitted). v. The total number of residential dwelling units proposed by the applicant for the entire property is 31. vi. The traffic study prepared by Fuss and O'Neill Engineering estimates a maximum PM peak hour VTE count of 33. vii. The sewer line and water line network is depicted on sheet C1.0 of the plans and has been reviewed by the City Engineer and the Superintendent of South Burlington Water Department. viii. The roadway, sidewalk, and recreation path details are outlined on sheets C1.1 though C1.4 of the plans. The plans have been reviewed by the Director of Public Works. ix. The sheets contained in the set of plans depict 1' contour intervals. x. The boundary surveys for the property are depicted on sheets S1.0 and S1.1 of the plans. A. The proposed intersection has been staked in the field and has been designed to intersect existing driveways and/or undeveloped lots along Spear Street. xii. The applicant is requesting the following waivers for the proposed project: a) Reduction of the local roadway pavement width from 28' to 24'. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. 1. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated April 29, 2005. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master Preliminary.do According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated April 28, 2005. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 30' wide public street in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 30' and a minimum right-of-way width of 60'. The proposed public street connecting the proposed collector street to the cul-de-sac in the southwest portion of the property will be a local public street. The plans show a 50' wide right-of-way and a 24' pavement width. According to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the minimum pavement width for a local public street is 28'. In addition, the pavement width of the proposed cul-de-sac is not in compliance with Figure 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, which requires a pavement width of 24'. Staff recommends that both of these pavement widths be increased to comply with the Land Development Regulations. The proposed roadways that cross the wetlands on the property have a pavement width reduced to 24'. Staff encourages this reduction in pavement width as it will reduce the associated impacts on the wetlands. The Director of Public Works has stated that the local roadway pavement width shall be a minimum of 26', with wetland crossings being reduced to 24'. 4. The plans shall be revised to depict the local public street, in areas that are not crossing wetlands, at a pavement width of 26; prior to recording of the master plat plan.. 5. The plans shall be revised to depict the proposed cul-de-sac at a pavement width of 24 ; prior to recording of the master plat plan. Circulation throughout the proposed development is sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 7"' Edition, 19 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 19.19 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic and 12 duplex units are estimated to add 6.24 P.M peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic, for a total of 25.43 vtes during the P.M. peak hour. This development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Fuss and O'Neill Associates, which indicates that the proposed project is estimated to generate 33 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. Fuss and O'Neill is also the traffic engineering firm that produced the Spear CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master_preliminary doc Street Corridor Study, so its recommendation should conform to those outlined in the applicant's traffic impact study. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadways will cross the wetlands on the northern and southern side of the property. The South Burlington Natural Resource Committee reviewed the plans for the proposed project at its meeting on April 7, 2005. They recommended approval of the master plan and preliminary plat plan with the following conditions: 1. there should be no application of pesticides within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 2. there should be no mowing within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 3. the natural vegetation should be retained within the wetlands and their 50' wide buffers; 4. the road widths at the wetland crossings should be permitted at the narrowest width permissible by the Development Review Board; 5. the NRC should review the plans again prior to final approval. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staff's opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to fall. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate frre protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed and approved the plans. 6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department, as outlined in the letter from Chief Douglas Brent, dated October 31, 2003 (attached). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master preliminary.do Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus, the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, a 10' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property to the property to the north. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the plans at its meeting on December 1, 2003. They approved the proposed recreation path along the easterly boundary of the project discussed above. In their letter dated December 2, 2003 (attached), they request that the proposed sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street be replaced with a 10' wide recreation path, which is consistent with the Official City Map. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 7. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. The applicant submitted an adequately prepared landscaping plan for both the street trees and the site landscaping. In addition, an adequately prepared landscape budget was submitted (attached). However, the applicant did not submit the estimated building cost of the proposed two-family dwelling units, so staff cannot determine if the minimum landscaping requirement is being met. 8. The applicant shall submit, with the final plat application, the estimated building cost of the two- family dwelling units, so that the minimum landscaping requirement can be determined. 9. The landscaping plans shall be reviewed by the City Arborist, prior to final plat approval. Lot Layout According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. The lots depicted on the plans are in compliance with this requirement. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d_rblsub\farrell\master oreliminarv.doc Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. 10. The plans should be revised to include information, on a lot by lot basis, on the maximum height limit for each lot, prior to submittal of the final plat application. SEQ Restricted Area Lots #1-3 and #20 of the subject property fall within a Southeast Quadrant "restricted area". Currently, single-family dwellings exist on Lots #1 and #20. However, Lots # 2 and #3 are undeveloped. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may allow development activities to occur in the "restricted areas" provided the Development Review Board determines that such development activities are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant, which is outlined in Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations. 11. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Development Review Board to develop in the "restricted area" of the subject property, prior to final plat approval. Other 12. The final plat application shall include proposed street names. 13. The final plat application shall include street address in accordance with E-911 addressing standards. 14. Pursuant to Section 15.18(B)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, the final plat submittal shall include an open space management plan. 15. The plans submitted with final plat application shall not depict any of the proposed single- family dwelling units, unless the applicant intends to have the Development Review Board approve the specific building footprints shown on the plans. The proposed building enveloped, however, should be included on the plans. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\master meliminarv.doc 16. The plans shall be revised to indicate that the Vail Drive cul-de-sac will be removed, prior to submittal of the final plat application. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Master Plan application #SD-05- 01, and the associated request for preliminary plat application, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document. Respectful) submitted, 4 rian Robe n, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4io6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Spear Meadows Spear Street 04/28/05 1. The down stream sewer main must be checked for capacity. 2. Cover sheet of plans shall have an index of sheets. 3. Sewer services to each lot shall be installed where possible perpendicular to the main. 4. City Highway Superintendent shall be consulted regarding street crossing markings. 5. Road pavement thickness shall be 2 1/2 inch base course and 11/2 inch surface course for a total of 4 inches. 6. Trees must not be planted on top of sewer and water mains. Tree planting plans Li through L6 shall show these utilities. 7. Gas main plans shall be submitted to the City for review. 8. City street R.O.W. shall be a minimum of 6o feet in width. 9. Left turn lane at Spear Street intersection should be considered. io. Curb cuts shall be continuous across driveways with a 11/2 inch reviel. ii. All sewer manholes must be accessible for mobil cleaning equipment. 12. There should be a minimum three-foot grassed area between the road and bicycle path along the east side of this development. 13. Concrete sidewalk at driveways shall be 8-inch thickness. SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 April 29, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Steve Vock PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows Dear Sirs: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the preliminary plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District #1, and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 4. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the `Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 5. Looping of all water lines is a design requirement. The incoming water line for this project shall be eight -inch (8") DI. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on either water main. 6. Gate valves shall normally be placed a maximum of five hundred feet (500') apart. Tee intersections shall have a minimum of three (3) gate valves. Cross sections (four way intersections) shall have a minimum of four (4) valves. 7. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 8. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 9. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each intersection, with a maximum of 500' between hydrants. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Fire hydrants may be Kennedy K-81 A, Mueller Centurion, or Waterous Pacer. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." The same model fire hydrant should be used throughout this project. 10. Corporations shall be Mueller H-15008 (3/4" -1"), or Mueller H 15013 (1 %z"- 2") or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B 25209 or Cambridge Brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge Brass. All curb stop rods shall be stainless steel. 11. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 12. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced CWD Specifications. 13. Sheet Comments: a. Sheet C1.1: The SBWD and CWD would prefer the water connection for this project not be made on the CWD transmission main located on Swift Street as proposed. Instead we request that the project be supplied water by extending the water main from Meadowood Drive. The installation of eight -inch HDPE pipe by using trenchless technology would enable the line be extended from Meadowood Drive without disrupting the current properties at the end of the cu-de-sac. The SBWD and CWD request that the applicant pursue access for the connection on Meadowood Drive prior to any further plan reviews. b. Sheet C 1.2: An air release valve and manhole, fire hydrant or house service connection at the high point on the water main at Station 16+00. c. Sheet C 1.3: See number 9 above for proper hydrant locations. . d. Sheet C l * The connection on Vale Drive will be to an eight -inch DI water line that should be shown on future plans. e. All Plan and Profile Sheets: Show all tees, gate valves and fire hydrant locations. 14. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 15. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 16. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 17. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 18. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Since ely, 7 r fay Nale au Superintendent CC. Brian Robertson ✓ Doug Brent Plan Reviews: Spear Meadows -Prelim CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM To: Eric Farrell From: Betsy McDonough, E 9-1-1 Coordinator Re: Spear Meadows Street Names and E 94-1 N mbers Date: April 29, 2005 The main road through Spear Meadows will have to be named Vale Drive, per 9-1-1 regulations. Addressing shall start from the south end of the new Vale Drive extension per 9-1-1 standards. Prior to final plat submittal, please submit a name for the street accessing the multi- family units to the Planning Commission for approval. The street name must be unique to both South Burlington and Burlington. Please contact me with any questions. Spear Meadows - Spear Street, South Burlington - Planting Schedule 3/7/2005 Street Trees Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 16 AF ACER x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 BP BETULA papyrifera Paper Birch 8 - 10' Ht. B&B CLUMP 16 FP FRAXINUS pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Patmore Ash 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 GT GLEDITSIA tricanthos inermis'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 9 QB QUERCUS bicolor Swamp White Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 13 QR QUERCUS rubra Red Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM Trees Ot . Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec Notes 13 AF ACER x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 AS ACER saccharum'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 10 BN BETULA nigra River Birch 8 - 10' Ht. B&B CLUMP 3 BP BETULA papyrfera Paper Birch 8 - 10' Ht. B&B CLUMP 1 CC CRATAEGUS crusgalli inermis'Crusader Crusader Hawthorn 2" Cal. B&B or Cont. 4 GT GLEDITSIA tricanthos inermis'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 58 LD LARIX decidua Larch 6 - 8' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 1 MSC MAGNOLIA stellata 'Centennial' Centennial Magnolia 8-10' Ht. B&B 20 PA PICEA abies Norway Spruce 6 - 8' Ht. B&B 63 PG PICEA glauca White Spruce 5 - 6' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 7 QB QUERCUS bicolor Swamp White Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 2 QR QUERCUS rubra Red Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 14 SA SALIX alba'Tristis' Golden Weeping Willow 1 3/4" Cal. B&B Shn.hs Ot . Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Sec Notes 42 CO CEPHALANTHUS occidentalis Buttonbush 30" #3 Cont. 10 CA CLETHRA alnifolia Summersweet 30" #5 Cont. 67 CR CORNUS racerrosa Grey Dogwood 34 Ht. B&B 30 IV ILEX verticillata Winterberry 3' B&B 7 JHB JUNIPERUS honzontalis'Blue Chip' Blue Chip Juniper 15-18" #3 Cont. 10 JV JUNIPERUS virginiana'Grey Owl' Grey Owl Juniper 24" B&B 68 TO THUJA occidentalis Arborvitae 6 - 8' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 20 TON THUJA occidentals 'Nigra' Dark Green Arborvitae 5 - 6' Ht. B&B 14 VD IVIBURNUM dentatum Arrowwood Viburnum 3 - 4' Ht. B&B or Cont. 8 VT IVIBURNUM tnlobum American Cranberrybush 3 - 4' Ht. B&B or Cont. Ot . Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 18 HH DAYLILY MIX' 18" 1 Gallon 18" O.C. 'DAYLILY MIX TO BE EQUAL PARTS OF HEMEROCALLIS'Flava', Green Flutter, AND'Hypenon' T. J. Boyle Associates Unit Price Installed $170.00 $2,720.00 $ 6,800.00 $125.00 $625.00 $ 1,562.50 $135.00 $2,160.00 $ 5,400.00 $160.00 $800.00 $ 2,000.00 $175.00 $1,575.00 $ 3,937.50 $145.00 $1,885.00 $ 4,712.50 Unit Price $170.00 $2,210.00 $ 5,525.00 $130.00 $650.00 $ 1,625.00 $120.00 $1,200.00 $ 3,000.00 $125.00 $375.00 $ 937.50 $115.00 $115.00 $ 287.50 $160.00 $640.00 $ 1,600.00 $40.00 $2,320.00 $ 5,800.00 $200.00 $200.00 $ 500.00 $135.00 $2,700.00 $ 6,750.00 $40.00 $2,520.00 $ 6,300.00 $175.00 $1,225.00 $ 3,062.50 $145.00 $290.00 $ 725.00 $95.00 $1,330.00 $ 3,325.00 Unit Price $17.00 $714.00 $ 1,785.00 $20.00 $200.00 $ 500.00 $17.00 $1,139.00 $ 2,847.50 $23.00 $690.00 $ 1,725.00 $13.50 $94.50 $ 236.25 $20.00 $200.00 $ 500.00 $26.00 $1,768.00 $ 4,420.00 $48.00 $960.00 $ 2,400.00 $20.00 $280.00 $ 700.00 $30.00 $240.00 $ 600.00 Unit Price $8.00 $144.00 $ 360.00 $ 79,563.75 02250 - Spear Meadows Subdivision Lot Acreage as depicted on Preliminary Plat of Subdivision date 3/29/05 Calculated by JSO Lot # Acreage (SF) Acreage (Ac) 1 24,292 0.56 2 19,809 0.45 3 22,515 0.52 4 19,121 0.44 5 18,636 0.43 6 20,372 0.47 7 15,539 0.36 8 17,939 0.41 9 19,769 0.45 10 25,992 0.60 11 25,486 0.59 12 24,818 0.57 13 16,066 0.37 14 18,074 0.41 15 17,442 0.40 16 24,648 0.57 17 22,148 0.51 18 21,795 0.50 19 145,623 3.34 20 156,601 3.60 HOA 1 123,664 2.84 HOA 2 98,005 2.25 HOA 3 32,938 0.76 Total Lots 931,294 21.38 Public ROW 205,622 4.72 Total Acreage 1,136, 916 26.1 Fuss & O'Neill Inc. TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT SPEAR MEADOWS SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT INTRODUCTION This traffic report presents the analysis and evaluation of traffic conditions associated with a proposed a residential development to be located off Spear Street in South Burlington. The development consists of the construction of seventeen (17) new single family homes and twelve (12) condominium units, for a total of 29 units. This study includes the results of a field investigation and analysis of the estimated traffic to be generated by the site during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. All figures, capacity analysis worksheets and traffic count data summaries are appended. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The proposed development will be located on the east side of Spear Street, with access to the site to be located between the Swift Street and Cedar Glen intersections. The proposed new road for these homes will intersect with Spear Street at the north end of the property at street number 1350 Spear Street. The road will run parallel with Spear Street on the east and connect with the north end of Vale Drive. Vale Drive is an existing residential subdivision road that connects to Nowland Farm Road. Traffic Volumes Information on traffic volumes and peak hour intersection traffic on Spear Street was obtained from Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) sources and prior traffic studies in the area. Traffic counts were conducted at the following intersections during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours: • Spear Street at Nowland Farm Road/Deerfield Drive • Nowland Farm Road at Vale Drive • Nowland Farm Road at Four Sisters Road Figures 2 and 3 indicate the December 2004 traffic volumes at the Nowland Farm Road/Spear Street intersection to the south of the site, as counted in December. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Spear Street adjacent to the location where the site roadway would be constructed is a two- lane roadway with approximately 30 %2 feet of pavement. The travel lanes are 12 feet wide, I FAP2004\0945\A I Mraffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc Fuss & O'Neill Inc. with a 1 foot paved shoulder area along the east side and a 5 %2 ft. paved shoulder along the west side. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. The roadway alignment on Spear Street in this area is relatively flat, with a straight horizontal alignment. The nearest street intersection to the north is Swift Street, approximately 1200 feet away. Cedar Glen Drive is located to the south about 750 feet away. PROJECTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Design Hour Traffic Volumes Figures 4 and 5 indicate the adjusted 2004 traffic volumes, which are based on existing counts conducted in the area factored to an estimate of the design hour volume (DHV). The DHV is used in assessing traffic impacts of project development. The design hour volume represents typically the 301h high hour of the year and is used as a basis for the design of facilities. Count station P6D099 on I-189, just east of Route 7 in South Burlington, was used as the basis for derivation of the design hour volumes for this project. Site Generated Traffic The traffic generated by the proposed development was based on the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation manual. The trip generation for the site was based on the occupancy of 29 residential units. Table 1 summarizes the expected trip generation for the project on a daily (24-hour weekday) basis and for morning and afternoon peak hours. During the weekday afternoon peak hour, 33 trip ends are estimated (21 entering and 12 exiting). Weekday daily (i.e. 24- hour) traffic volumes are expected to total approximately 310 vehicles. For the weekday morning peak hour, 31 trip ends are estimated for the site (7 entering and 24 exiting). Table 1 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC ESTIMATES TIME PERIOD IN OUT TOTAL WEEKDAY (24-Hour) 155 155 310 MORNING PEAK HOUR 7 24 31 AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR 21 12 33 2 FAP2004\0945\A10\Traffic Study Report\TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.doc CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES OF April 7, 2005 The South Burlington Natural Resources Committee met on Thursday, April 71h, 2005 at 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Peter Jones, Bill Schuele, and Chris Shaw. Others Present: Associate Planner Brian Robertson, Julian Goodrich, Alan Brusoe, Eric Farrell The meeting was called to order with a quorum of committee members present at approximately 7:10 P.M. Alan's Auto — Site Plan #SP-05-13 Julian introduced the project and explained the site layout to the Committee. He explained how the drainage and overall runoff on the property works, pointing out the collection pond to the west of the subject property. Peter inquired about site conditions during heavy rain, and wanted to know how the applicant anticipated the site to handle heavy rain with the additional impervious surface proposed through this project. Julian responded that the large amount of pervious surface that would remain on the site would adequately handle heavy rains. Alan explained that the Class III wetland that is proposed to be impacted is a result of the surface runoff accumulating at the end of the pavement, which created and artificial wetland that served as a drainage way. Julian explained that a similar artificial wetland and drainage way would reestablish at the end of the proposed pavement boundary. The Committee agreed that the proposed impacts are reasonable and justifiable. Due to the anticipated re-establishment of the artificial wetland, the Committee did not see it necessary to recommend and mitigation measures. Therefore, the Committee recommended approval of the project as submitted to the Development Review Board. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Spear Meadows — Master Plan #MP-05-01 Eric explained the project and gave an overview of the site. He explained where the wetland boundaries and buffers were located, and stated that his wetland consultant believes the wetland on the south side of the property are class ll, while the wetland on the north side of the property is class III. Eric stated that the main difference between the classifications of the wetlands is that he will have to obtain a CUD from the State if the northerly wetland is a class III. He also explained that the proposed roadways will cross the wetlands at the points of least impact, in terms of area. The Committee also discussed the proposed culverts for the wetland crossings. Peter City of South Burlington Natural Resources Committee Minutes of April 7, 2005 Page 2 of 3 suggested that Eric consider wetland crossing that would be "wildlife friendly." Eric agreed to research these "wildlife friendly" crossings. The Committee also discussed the stormwater management systems on the property. Eric explained, in very general terms, how they would work and which lots were served by which detention pond. The Committee recommended approval to the Development Review Board for the master plan and preliminary plat plan, with the following conditions: 1. there should be no application of pesticides within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 2. there should be no mowing within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 3. the natural vegetation should be retained within the wetlands and their 50' wide buffers; 4. the road widths at the wetland crossings should be permitted at the narrowest width permissible by the Development Review Board; 5. the NRC should review the plans again prior to final approval. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:00 P.M. The next meeting was set for Thursday, May e, 2005 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall. Respectfully Submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Chris Shaw, Clerk i SOUTH BURL GTON RECREATION D' PARTMENT 575 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 TEL: (802) 846-4108 • FAX: (802) 846-4101 THOMAS HUBBARD, CPRP RECREATION DIRECTOR TODD GOODWIN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TO: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator FROM: Tom Hubbard. Recreation Director RE: Recreation Path Committee recommendations DATE: December 2, 2003 The Recreation Path Committee, at their meeting of 12/01 /03, made the following recommendations: In regard to the Farrell (Redstone) -Spear St. Development Eric Farrell presented a revised plan for the development and the committee approves the shown recreation path along the east side of the development. The committee recommends that this path be extended at the southern end to Vale Dr., and at the northern end to the northern boundary bordering the UVM land. The path should be 10 feet wide. The committee also recommends that a 10-foot wide recreation path be built along the northern side of the street leading from Spear St. into the development. These recommendations are consistent with the official city map update and the committee is interested in seeing if UVM would approve a continuation of the path from this development to Swift St. UVM Parking Garage In connection with the UVM parking garage on Spear St., the committee recommends that a pedestrian walkway along the east side of the garage along Spear St. be built. At present, there is space for pedestrians to walk to Williston Rd. in this area. The garage would cut off this pedestrian accessibility. MEMBER: VERMONT RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION - NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 concerned with a shift from a family -oriented use to an "after-hours" use. Mr. Kupferman suggested landscaping along the property line between the Jarvis and Bensen properties. Mr. Jarvis also said his building is completely insulated. Ms. Espinola of Dunkin Donuts asked that their part of the application be considered. They are requesting the addition from 2100 to 2408 sq. ft. Mr. Dinklage noted that the front yard landscaping is part of both applications. Ms. Espinola said they have to have their work done by 3.1 August because they are having trouble with the head office. A poll of members showed no issues with the Dunkin Donuts expansion. An audience members raised the issue of the safety of pedestrians crossing Williston Road and also the impact of the proposed use on JC Park. Mr. Belair noted he had received a call for another resident who didn't feel this use fit into the area. He explained that this is a permitted use. Mr. Boucher suggested waiving the bike rack requirement as this is a night use. Mr. Boucher then moved to continue preliminary plat application #SD-04-18 and final plat application #SD-04-19 and site plan application SP-04-15 until 4 May 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch plan application #CU-04-20 of Eric Farrell for a planned unit development consisting of 19 single family lots and six two-family dwellings on 25.93 acres, 1302 and 1350 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell reviewed changes made from the previous presentation. He noted they have reduced the number of single family lots to 19. The cul de sac now has 6 duplexes (12 condo units). Mr. Farrell also showed the general layout and stressed that these are not actual footprints. With regard to the issue of connecting to Vale Drive, Mr. Farrell said they agree it needs to be connected and are showing the connection. He also showed pedestrian crossing to get to bike paths. The bike path will connect from Vale Drive all the way to Spear St. There is a possibility of a left turn lane at the entrance. IKIE E DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 The street widths will be reviewed with the Superintendent as some are a little narrower. Mr. Bolton suggested a fenced area along with wetland setback. Mr. Belair noted that lots 2 and 3 are in the restricted zone. The Board was still OK with this. Mr. Bolton questioned the possibility of creating a physical impediment so this doesn't become a "cut through." Mr. Farrell didn't think this made a lot of sense. Ms. Quimby suggested speed bumps or other traffic calming. Mr. Belair said the applicant can work with Public Works on this. Mr. Farrell felt traffic calming would be more effective. Mr. Kleh, an abutter, noted that snow plows have all kinds of trouble with cul de sacs and the city is forced to come back with smaller trucks. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will follow the advice of the Street Superintendent and City Engineer on this. Mr. Kleh asked if there will really be 65 shade trees as shown. Mr. Farrell said there will. Mr. Kley was concerned that headlights will shine directly at their house. Mr. Farrell said they can have denser landscaping to address this. Mr. Kleh was also concerned with the density of development and specifically its impact of wildlife. David and Linda Young, abutters, were concerned with water pressure in the area. They also felt that since there is a special sewer assessment district in the area, the impact cost should be shared with this proposed development. They also wanted to be sure the town houses were of good quality in keeping with the surrounding houses. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will want to see the elevations of the town houses. Mr. Farrell said the stormwater system will meet the state standard and the city standard, and both are very high. He will also have strict architectural control over the homes that are built, even though he will not be doing the building. Mr. Boucher asked about phasing. Mr. Farrell said they will build all the infrastructure The question of lighting was raised. Mr. Farrell said there will be street lights. They haven't yet done a layout but will submit a plan. Mr. Belair said the City Engineer will review lighting plans. -5- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 APRIL 2004 Mr. Scollins felt the people at Pinnacle should also be notified of this project. Mr. Farrell said he will do that. Mr. Scollins said he felt there are still some tightly packed lots. He also questioned the compatibility of the duplexes with surrounding homes. Mr. Dietchen noted this property contains one of the last truly open parcels in the city and asked about a view corridor. Mr. Farrell said the can look into this. Ms. Plant was concerned with the condos. She felt the ones on the golf course are very uninteresting and definitely "not Vermont." Mr. Farrell said they will try for some variation. 6. Public Hearing: Application #CU-04-03 of Burlington Platform Tennis for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to construct an additional platform tennis court, 12-1/2 East Terrace: and 7. Site Plan Application #SD-04-14 of Burlington Platform Tennis to amend a previously approved plan for 2500 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facilities including a pool, tennis courts, and a paddle ball court. The amendment consists of: 1) adding one paddle ball court, and 2) constructing a 240 sq. ft. warming hut, 12-1/12 East Terrace: Mr. Belair noted this is a repeat of a previous approval and has no changes. He had no issue with the requests. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-04-03 and Site Plan Application #SD- 04-14 of Burlington Platform Tennis subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-04-16 and final jplat application #SD-04-17 of Veve Associates, LLP, to amend a previously approved plan for a 104 unit planned development. The amendment consists of 1) boundary line adjustment to increase the size of the lot by 4100 sq. ft. for a total lot size of 14.795 acres at 435 Dorset St., and 2) constructing two 2-family dwellings on a 37,380 sq. ft. lot at 118 Oakwood Drive: Mr. Marcheseau said they have provided a landscaping plan and building elevations. He committed to building the buildings as shown on the elevations. -6- 7 /�rj'/r///r // %/�'r�'/ /%// j / //j �/%/ /� % /' j �/ /% � // / i / ir���/ /� /'% /ice ��/'i /, j%/�% /i,'r / i 'j%� •7�j i. //i/, / � // /, 77 ////�rr�// y/ /ir' /i'ir/'/r'/i i�'� rrii'//r/''r/i///'//'///rr// /'//'/�/'' /�'ri /'�r'rri�r✓/r /r�/i'�ri �r i / /� ii/ '/y�/r!i/�/i / i"rr i�/' Z iO /'''////'r//''j m 4//�'O Z i// / , rr // /r / rr �r,�, /, /r rr r / a V) r // (n� r� i�i ii�r''/ ' r'i'i %i'Yri' /rir/'/r''/'r/''/rr//'r �'/C7 > riri''/ L-5 nn 0 m /i rri /i �?; / �' r ; i/ rim''„i fir'/i/� �'�rii� rr i/i / r /�/ir ii'ir� i� // p�iii/ /i% i% / r%/ i %i %r/ i // ri,� /r,/ riii��i/ iii/%' ii Z `j /ri ri /i r / ,/ /j , /i COFL'/ ul U O i/'~ Z O 0 O /i ri rjY/ r '/ii' /U' ir'/i rUi/r//'//ii��',/i VY ri r 4) I r , // r/ / //i/' �/ / /'/// /r r ,/,// ,i/r ,/r irr ri /ir i/ii/ / i'i ✓r,/i i /i r i/i/r . /i,/,,/i/r/ii'/r/ii /'/r/'i''/i'//j �r/''///ii'///i //iii/ i/' // // j i/i aj r x /i'�rMel N�'///�r/i � I Y-r-wl OIVd411illllll),� P4/r / � t.,QO ✓l.y r�> /v,,i. %c, /r � �4rj ri /j, , y /i, /r �! ' r—/ / ri /i h� r//i /i rr, /i r �.e Yi+' • • �,� � y /yr +/ r,., �r ' r/r, /i /r/ r / /i.' Lr ✓,`ii //r ,r,ri /, ri ri %ir��',��r,�'i /i,�' r ri , ri � � L �,. ✓i ., v ,r r ri // /i ri r / / /i r / /i // / /i / /i / 'sC /i /i r / rri ± y� I � �•i�' i�, r/i s!.✓r r✓i w /ir / r/i /r// ////„_,(i/ /'/i i i ri ri /,/�.,9 / / /i /i„ „� � r, //„ /, \ _ `�' � /✓,✓>//,,,>yryrji//i /i, / „ r/,i' r ri$�!/Wyi,/„ri ri/i ri ri„ /rr, r: r/i /iri /i, r// r/ ///i /i i � I I f i dr r/✓i,.y, /i, r/// / }},' /i r, r � ri / r r riG /r ri /i,i„„/ ri r9„ i /i ir' /i ri, r,r / r � ri '/ '� /'Tri ' , �,'; 'Pr / / ✓i r ri r, / r, /„ „ ri /A i r /, / /, ri /i / rr r ri ri r r /i / '%�i // '/ / yr // / ri / 1.0 n ' i co If/i' N a m I (— C ils V' I ' I O / r, , r r /i / /r r r r /i r ,1Hr<ir/�i rr r/rrii /i o I c a NI' / 7 it!} I o Bs � 1 ` r • [ , / I //„''/ //,/ , /rl ////// //,' j"j�✓r//„ „ / jrr/r// //// Ov I �s I , '' • % � / r / / rrr i,/jjii,/i�/rijlj//i/'/j/'j/r/� ii/ii i __----__—__ , / oo \ / _../i'.•r�,//,/r /�///,%fir ✓//// //,//�'// /i, ( � I � � ' • ,� • , , � / 1 ` / ci""yz' /r i // iii/r�' /i�3' ,� '/r/i�//' /i /i,i,/r d,,LO ,,rr c - co .93 a�^ m o O rn y III � I 1 ;i• ` �, �� a I� r�paLT CM I �m I I I I I I 4 6 8 � � z� QY �� U' °' �° m i I I I I ' m" Q N � �s o Co ` I a s d, 07 '� ro m w N _ .I RS 1� I I r� I I ��C N n C` N IV� CU 0 0 � 7 L° a 3 ,o. e '64��q • / a I J s N ZI cu j s III III I•„iM �{� I / / ro 4 N / - V WT III ; ,icu m� I a J L _ _ I, i• ' d I, Q 3,O1,6b.B I,•. ,' 1 �•� ---�, J� a � O co 1 / C14 m N W G:\Active Projects\Farrell Property 0222\Dwg\01-05-05 Spear St Sketch.dwg, 03/30/2005 08:39:11 AM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNENG & ZONETG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 29, 2005 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Eric: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1 U� Bets ono gh Administrative Assistant Encl. tumiture FULL-SIZE IMPERIAL mattress, box spring and frame. New in 2003, used in guest room 30 times or less. Making room for new baby, must sell. New $500, will sell for $350/OBO. 241-3543. MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA, mis- sion -style four -drawer dresser. A real find! $225. 371-9423. MOVING SALE: Oak roll-top desk, pine bedroom set, sleigh bed/dresser, mirror and armoire chest, Gazelle workout equip- ment, oak bunk bed. 434-8408. NEW LYNDON TABLE: Maple top, black wrought iron Queen Anne legs, 72 x 38. $1500 new. Best offer over $1000. 862- 7372. SOFA/LOVE SEAT SET: Oversized, Olive-green color, cor- douroy-esque material, very comfortable. Excellent condition. Asking $300. 999-9578 anytime. ► lost & found 14" IBOOK STOLEN FROM CAR it the Intervale, 3/31. Don't :are about laptop, but please eturn files via email, for gradu- Lte thesis. feb2004.xts files. Set ip an account anonymously and ;end to gundiee@uvm.edu. (DNA WAS LAST SEEN at 2415 'hompson's Point Rd. on 4/1 at ':45 a.m. Kona is very friendly rut most importantly has a very pecial diet and medical needs. 'lease, if you have seen him ince this time or find him call :rich, 238-8756. AST: MEWS WATCH on Shel- lurne/St. Paul near sidewalk. omewhere between Howard St. nd Flynn Ave. Black leather strap. 'lease contact 802-316-0776 or )hnjmcmurry@yahoo.com. TAGE SPEAKER STANDS found ring in the road. Describe in etail and we'll get you and your ear back together. Tell your fends. Otherwise, look for these abies on eBay. kozmikarl@ oLcom. music for sale 8TH ANNUAL National Guitar ionth sale: acoustic/electric uitars, basses, amplifiers, ffects. Up to 35-55% off MSRP )r entire month of April. Be usic, Rutland. 888-775-4030. ww.bemusicvt.com. ELLOS, STRING BASSES, VIO- INS, VIOLAS: New and old istruments, sales, restoration id repair. Experienced tuthiers. 3ut Perley Cellos, in business nce 1988. 802-229-1501, 3erleycellos@aoL com. DMPUTER RECORDING SYS- EM: Power Mac G4, 800 MHz ngle processor, 768 GB RAM, 20TOOLS DIGI 001 software and terface. Mouse and keyboard, > monitor. Also includes tons of usic software and ptugins inct. aason 2.5 and more. $900 takes 1. Call 802-310-7456. IEMBE 25", COW HIDE HEAD /rope frets. Carved wood base, Ames w/African cloth belt and idded carrying case. Ashiko, i", cow hide drum head VLLLA lAAVLL UAL'" J1; 1: ALL folds in to one case dies. Some cymbals, throe ped- als. $300. Call 863-9, , OVER 100 LP RECORD ALBUMS: Folk, country, rock, '60s, classical and just plain odd. Most in very good condi- tion. $30. Email for partial list. datep@pshift.com. PIANO: 1931 Stroud Baby -Grand piano for sale to good home. $3000 + moving costs. Beauti- ful details, good sound. Some superficial damage to original finish. 802-999-7848. ► music instruct. CLAW HAMMER BANJO: Learn Appalachian style pickin' and strummin. Emphasis on rhythm, musicality and technique. $25/hour. Call Mara, 862-3581. GUITAR: Berklee graduate with classical background offers Les- sons in guitar, theory and ear training. Individualized, step-by- step approach. I enjoy teaching all ages/styles/levels. Call Rick Belford at 864-7195. PIANO AND/OR IMPROVISA- TION: Lessons in theory, harmo- ny and improvisation for all instrumentalists and vocalists. All ages! Beginning through advanced concepts taught with clarity and patience. Questions? Call Shane Hardiman, 279-8859, Winooski. hipkeys@lycos.com. PIANO LESSONS Classical, jazz and free improvisation. Alt ages, all levels. Exciting and encourag- ing approach. Can travel. William Michael, 802-899-6700 or 355-6234. ► music services COSMIC HILL project recording studio. 30-years experience. $40/hour. Moretown. 496-3166. NORTHERN VERMONT MUSIC Protools Recording Studio, mas- tering services, remote record- ing. Special block rates. CD/DVD duplication. Songwriter demos. Backing tracks avail. Call 802- 744-6446 or http://www.north ernvermo ntm usi c. co m. 0-ZONE STUDIO: Audio record- ing, mixing and mastering. 208 Flynn Ave., Studio 2B1, Burling- ton. 203-246-5124. ► musicians wanted BURLINGTON BAND CRITICAL MASS seeks experienced drum- mer for classic rock covers. Vocals a plus. Gigs already booked. Call Scott, 233-1279 or criticatmassvt@yahoo.com. GUITARIST LOOKING FOR EXPERIENCED drums, bass and keys. Originals and vocals a big plus. Rock, jazz, groove improv, originals and favorite covers. Call 496-3166, before 5 p.m. SONGWRITER/GUITARIST Look- ing to start acoustic/etectric rock. Seeking drug/alcohol-free musicians of good musical range to play once a week. Have place to play. 318-1557. TECHNICAL/PROGRESSIVE METAL BAND in Burlington w/album of original material rnenaLy, neaLthy, sense of humor. Pet only. Please, only inquiries from those with large parrot experience. Call 802-660- 4897 or blondemss@hotmail. com. Asking $1400. RED TAIL BOA FOR SALE! Beautiful snake. 6 feet long. Very good temperament. Includes tank, water bowl, heat- ing pad, feeding tank, tank Lin- ers. $200. 660-8714. SMALL RETIRED PONY: Good pasture mate. Not a kids' pony. Sweet, friendly, smart. 878-8598. ► photography FEMALE MODELS: 15-35, need- ed for fashion shoots and other projects. No experience needed but models must be attractive and in good shape. Compensa- tion in pictures, experience and possible start in modeling indus- try. Call David Russell Photogra- phy, 862-1172 for interview or email rustdp@juno.com. ► stuff wanted WANTED: Salon equipment. Looking for all-purpose chair, shampoo bowl, hair dryer, the works. 453-5723. WANTED: TWO -TICKETS TO NIN at the Orpheum in Boston, Thursday or Friday night. 893-1744. ► volunteers HELP A SENIOR LIVE INDE- PENDENTLY: The Champlain Valley Agency on Aging (CVAA) is seeking kind souls who can donate one hour per week to visit with a senior and/or assist with essential tasks such as gro- cery shopping or light house- keeping. Info, contact Brett or Tom, 800-642-5119. ORGANIC FARM/WILDERNESS Collective in California seeking volunteers w/backpacking expe- rience and agrarian interests. Accommodations and veggie food. www.wildernessco[lec tive.com. WOMEN HELPING Battered Women needs your help! Women Helping Battered Women is cur- rently accepting applications for their May Volunteer Training. Opportunities range from work- ing directly with women and children to working "behind the scenes." Info, visit www.whbw. org or call 658-3131. ► want to buy ANTIQUES: Furniture, postcards, pottery, cameras, toys, medical tools, lab glass, photographs, slide rules, license plates and silver. Anything unusual or unique. Cash paid. Call Dave at 802-859-8966. MODERN SOS AND 60S FURNI- TURE by Eames, Knoll, Herman Miller, Bertoia, Saarinen, Aalto, Bertoia, Fritz Hansen, etc. Sometime called "space-age" or "retro"' Also interested in pot- tery, ceramics and lighting from this era. 864-9386. WANT TO BUY A SINGLE JOG - clerk. y oking for employment in Chitte/ ounty-area. Cal[ Chris, /62-9740. ► legals PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Vermont 05401, an Answer to the Complaint in the above enti- tled action within forty-one (41) days of the first publication of this Summons, which is 3/30/05. The action is a com- plaint and foreclosure which alleges that you have breeched attempts of Promissory Note and Mortgage Deed dated January 17 2002 Plaintiff's action may affect your The South Burlington interest in real property Development Review Board will described in the land records in hold a public hearing at the the City of South Burlington at South Burlington City Hall Volume 463, Pages 1-3. The Conference Room, 575 Dorset Complaint also seeks relief on Street, South Burlington, the Promissory Note executed by Vermont on Tuesday, May 3, you. A copy of the Complaint is 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider on file and may be obtained at the following: / r the Office of the Clerk of the ���� Superior Court for the County of 1. Master plan application #MP- Chittenden, State of Vermont. 05-01 and preliminary plat appti- It appearing from Affidavit duty cation for a planned unit devel- opment to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 sin- gle family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. 2. Application #VR-05-01 of Michael Hopwood for a variance from Section 3.06, Setbacks and Buffers, of the Land Develop- ment Regulations. Request is for permission to allow an addi- tion to an auto repair and serv- ice facility to project 17 feet into the required 30 foot front setback requirement, 63 Ethan Allen Dr. 3. Final plat application #SD-05- 28 of Provost Real Estate, LLC and Robert & Joyce Snyder for a planned unit development con- sisting of. 1) subdividing a 1.02 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.27 acres and 0.75 acres, 2) subdividing a 0.50 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) 0.25 acre Lots, 3) combining the undevel- oped 0.25 acre lot with the adjacent 0.75 acre lot to create a 1.0 acre lot, and 4) construct- ing two (2) two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot, 10 & 14 Shunpike Road. 4. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-29 and final plat appli- cation #SD-05-30 of Anthony Basiliere for a planned unit development to subdivide a 0.26 acre parcel developed with two (2) single family dwellings into two (2) lots of 0.13 acres each, 21 & 23 Meadow Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board April 13, 2005 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, S.S CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. 50207-05-CnC Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. as nominee for CTX Mortgage Company, L.L.C. Plaintiff filed in the above entitled action that service cannot be made with due diligence by any of the methods prescribed in V.R.C.P 4(d) through (f) inclu- sive, it is hereby ORDERED that service of the above process shalt be made upon defendant Michael Brace by publication pursuant to V.C.R.P. 4(g). This Order shalt be published once a week for three consecutive weeks on 3/30/05, 4/6/05 and 4/13/05 in the Seven Days. DATED at Burlington, Vermont this 21st day of March 2005. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Chittenden Superior Court Docket No. S0001-05 CnC Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. As nominee for GMAC Mortgage Corporation: Plaintiff: vs. MICHAEL W. BRACE, USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK AND OCCUPANTS residing at 5044 Spear Street, Shelburne, Vermont Defendants SUMMONS AND ORDER FOR PUB- LICATION TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFEW DANT. You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Mayer & Mayer, Plaintiffs attorneys, whose address is, P.O. Box 59, South Royalton, Vermont 05068, an answer to plaintiffs foreclo- sure action in the above matter, within forty-one (41) days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, which is April 6 2005. If you fait to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Your answer must be flied with the Court. Unless the relief demanded in the Complaint is for damages covered by a liabiti- ty insurance policy under which the insurer has the right or obli- gation to conduct the defense, or unless has the right or obtiga- tion to conduct the defense, or unless otherwise provided in Rule 13(a) your answer must state as a counterclaim any related claim which you may CITY OF S0►.EH �ORLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 Ab R �� 'Q O f✓p f 'i U40y _' nacle at Spear e79---f Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 13, 2005 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, l Betsy onough Administrative Assistant Encl. PUBLIC FEARING SOUTH BURLINGT®N DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 3, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Master plan application #MP-05-01 and preliminary plat application for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. 2. Application #VR-05-01 of Michael Hopwood for a variance from Section 3.06, Setbacks and Buffers, of the Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow an addition to an auto repair and service facility to project 17 feet into the required 30 foot front setback requirement, 63 Ethan Allen Dr. 3. Final plat application #SD-05-28 of Provost Real Estate, LLC and Robert & Joyce Snyder for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) subdividing a 1.02 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 0.27 acres and 0.75 acres, 2) subdividing a 0.50 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) 0.25 acre lots, 3) combining the undeveloped 0.25 acre lot with the adjacent 0.75 acre lot to create a 1.0 acre lot, and 4) constructing two (2) two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot, 10 & 14 Shunpike Road. 4. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-29 and final plat application #SD-05- 30 of Anthony Basiliere for a planned unit development to subdivide a 0.26 acre parcel developed with two (2) single family dwellings into two (2) lots of 0.13 acres each, 21 & 23 Meadow Road. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board April 13, 2005 TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON VT I HAVE RECEIVED A PLAN FROM ERIC FARRELL THAT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE I HAD RECEIVED EARLIER I WAS SHOCKED TO SEE THAT NOW MR FARRELL SUGGESTS TO CRAM TWELVE FAMILIES INTO A THREE ACRE AREA IN BACK OF MY HOUSE ON SPEAR STREET, I AM ABSOLUTELY AGAINST THIS. TWELVE FAMILIES IN SUCH A SMALL AREA RIGHT IN BACK OF MY HOUSE THAT WOULD MEAN TWENTYFOUR CARS OR MORE COMING AND GOING AND POLLUTING: I COULD HAVE ACCEPTED THE FIRST PLAN BUT I ABSOLUTELY CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS ONE: S�uuly 1430 Spear Street South Burlington VT May 5. 2004 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS 12/04/03 FARRELL SUBDIVISION Spear Street 1. Spear Street intersection should be improved to include a left turn lane. Also sight distance triangles at that intersection. 2. Cul-de-sac width should be at least 24 ft. 3. Private underground utilities, power, tel., TV, shall be outside of the street R.O.W. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 DECEMBER 2003 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a special meeting on Tuesday, 9 December 2003, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; R. Farley, L. Kupferman, M. Kupersmith, G. Quimby, M. Boucher Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer, E. Farrell, On this evening, the Board secretary was taking minutes at a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting, and the tape machine which was thought to be taping the DRB meeting malfunctioned. The minutes which follow represent only the warned agenda items and the action taken on them at this meeting. 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-38 of Homestead Design, Inc., for a planned unit development on a 44.78 acre parcel consisting of. 1) nine 3-unit multi -family dwellings, 2) 14 four -unit multi -family dwellings, and 3) one 6-unit multi -family dwelling, 895 Dorset Street. Following discussion, Mr. Boucher moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-38 of Homestead Design, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 6-0. 3.. Continued sketch plan #SD-03-66 of Eric Farrell for a planned unit development on 25.77 acres consisting of: 1) 26 single family lots, 2) a 3.35 acre lot with an existing single family dwelling, 3) a 0.51 acre lot with an existing single family dwelling, and 4) three open space lots,1302 and 1340 Spear Street: Discussion was held on this item. No action was taken. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Cler 6316-vy Date S�GN JN SHEET M E E T I N G: lb) M&OT X DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY!!!!! NAME ADDRESS Dan ll=,rl-r nc jKl-rr:mr7cl-r ve eev I L—A C. AS i Q 23) 77 q 4- A-7 f" 4) k- )L I L-, L 4 XV ;�7 CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 9, 2005 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate P.O. Box 1335 Re: Master Plan #MP-04-01 and Prelimary Plat Approval Dear Mr. Farrell. - Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on May 3, 2005 (effective 05/05/05). Please note the conditions, including that the Master Plan approval be recorded within 90 days (by 08/03/05) and that the final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months of this decision, or the preliminary plat approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BI..TRLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 19, 2004 Eric Farrell P.O. Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Minutes Dear Eric: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the April 20, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, '�-&* c- d ujn Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 16, 2004 Eric Farrell PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: 1302 & 1350 Spear Street Dear Eric: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. Since , CA Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch_doc Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a planned unit development consisting of 19 single-family lots and six (6) two-family dwellings on 25.93 acres, 1302 and 1350 Spear Street. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ). The Development Review Board reviewed the initial sketch plans for the proposed project at the meeting on December 9, 2003 (minutes attached). The applicant has submitted amended plans for sketch plan review. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on March 24, 2004 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements S>EQ Zoning CiiStriiCt Required PTopt�d v' Min:. Lot Size i 12, 000 ff 1 i 17, 424 f- (Lots # 14&15) _ l Max DertrAy 12 unillslacre 1.2un*stacre Max BuidiV Coveirage 15% rVa i Max Overal Coverage 1i 30% rva Min_ Front Setback 20 ft 20 ft 11 Min. Side Setba& A10 & I, 10 fl Mn. Rear Setba& 30 fl!_ 30 IL Max MAding Heigtrt 40 tt <40 & .,. Master Plan Approval: Pursuant to Section 15.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant requires a master Plan approval. The proposed project does involve the development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant, but the proposed plan accounts for the maximum density on the subject property. Thus, the applicant is not required to submit a separate master plan application. Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. 1. The plans should be revised to include information, on a lot by lot basis, on the maximum height limit for each lot, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 2. The legend of the plans should be revised to replace the phrase "South Burlington Overlay District' with the phrase "Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. " SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Jay Nadeau, Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department, the City does not have sufficient water storage for any new project requiring more than 1,000 GPD in this service area. 3. Occupancy of this project shall not take place until additional water storage is built in the City that would supply this high-pressure zone. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 4. Prior to final approval, the City Engineer shall certify that available sewer capacity is sufficient to serve the proposed subdivision. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 30' wide public street in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 30' and a minimum right-of-way width of 60'. The proposed public street connecting the proposed collector street to the cul-de-sac in the southwest portion of the property will be a local public street. The plans show a 50' wide right-of-way and a 24' pavement width. According to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, the minimum pavement width for a local public street is 28'. In addition, the pavement width of the proposed cul-de-sac is not in compliance with Figure 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, which requires a pavement width of 24'. The proposed roadways that cross the wetlands on the property have a pavement width reduced to 24'. Staff encourages this reduction in pavement width as it will reduce the associated impacts on the wetlands. However, the Director of Public Works will have to review and provide comments regarding the reduction in pavement width prior to final approval. 6. The plans should be revised to depict the local public street with a pavement width of 28 ; prior to the next plan submittal. 7. The plans shall be revised to depict the proposed cul-de-sac with a pavement width of 24, prior to the next plan submittal. 8. The Director of Public Works shall review and submit comments regarding the reduction in roadway pavement widths at wetland crossings to 24, prior to the next plan submittal. Circulation throughout the proposed development appears to be sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 7th Edition, 19 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 19.19 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic and 12 duplex units are estimated to add 6.24 P.M peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic, for a total of 25.43 vtes during the P.M. peak hour. This development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. The City is currently undergoing a traffic study for the entire Spear Street corridor. The applicant should be prepared to comply with any of the study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. 9. The applicant should comply with any of the Spear Street corridor study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. The project"s design respecis an will pr Vvidc suitable protection to wedands, streams; wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadway will cross the wetlands on the northern side of the property. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrel I\sketch. doc 10. The applicant shall obtain advisory comments from the Natural Resource Committee to construct the proposed roadway over the existing wetland, prior to final approval. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staffs opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to fall. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed and approved the plans. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department, as outlined in the letter from Chief Douglas Brent, dated October 31, 2003 (attached). Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus, the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, a 10' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property to the property to the north. The Recreation Path ('nmmitfaa reviewed the ninnc nt it meetinn nn December 1 2003 They .....�..�., r,...... .........., -•• ---- ---- approved the proposed recreation path along the easterly boundary of the project discussed above. In their letter dated December 2, 2003 (attached), they request that the proposed sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street be replaced with a 10' wide recreation path, which is consistent with the Official City Map. 12. The plans shall be revised to replace the sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street with a 10' wide recreation path, prior to submittal of the next plans. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc 13. The City Engineer shall review the stormwater facilities and utilities plans, prior to final approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 14. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new electric, telephone, outdoor lighting, and cable distribution systems shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. Also, the Regulations state the applicant shall submit a landscaping phasing plan with the subdivision application. 15. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping plan with the next plan submittal. 16. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping budget, prepared by a landscape architect or a professional landscape designer, with the next plan submittal. 17. The plans shall be reviewed by the City Arbo►ist, prior to final approval. Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. The lots depicted on the plans are in compliance with this requirement. SEQ Restricted Area Lots #1-3 and #20 of the subject property fall within a Southeast Quadrant "restricted area". Currently, single-family dwellings exist on Lots #1 and #20. However, Lots # 2 and #3 are undeveloped. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may allow development activities to occur in the "restricted areas" provided the Development Review Board determines that such development activities are CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\su blfarrel I\sketch. doc consistent with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant, which is outlined in Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations. 18. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Development Review Board to develop in the "restricted area" of the subject property, prior to final approval. 19. The plans shall be revised to depict the "restricted area" running through the subject property, as shown on the City of South Burlington Southeast Quadrant Official Zoning Map, prior to submittal of the next plans. Other 20. The preliminary plans shall be revised to incorporate the requirements of the City Engineer, as outlined in his Comments dated October 9, 2003 and December 4, 2003 (attached). 21. The preliminary plat plans should include proposed street names. 22. The preliminary plat plans shall include street address in accordance with E-911 addressing standards. 23. Pursuant to Section 15.18(B)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, the preliminary plat submittal shall include an open space management plan. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS 10/09/03 FARRELL SUBDIVISION Spear Street 1. Spear Street R.O.W width is 66 ft. Plan shows 50 ft. 2. Trees should not be placed on top of water and sewer mains. They should be at least 10 feet away. 3. A sliver of land at the Spear St. intersection should be part of the new street R.O.W. 4. There should be a sidewalk (5 ft. concrete) from Spear St. to bike path. Also along loop road serving lots 15 to 20. 5. The paved width of the loop road should be at least 24 ft in width to allow school buses to pass parked cars. 6. All streets shall have concrete curbs and drainage. 7. Power, telephone, and T.V. lines shall be outside of the street R.O.W. 8. The sewer mains down stream must be checked for capacity to see if they can handle the flow from this project. 9. The Spear St. intersection should be widen for left turns. Farrell Real Estate, Inc. P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner City of South B14�rlinygton From Eric Farrell C Date: May 3, 2005 Re: Spear Meadows Enclosed please find revised landscape drawings L1, L2, L4 and L5, which contain minor landscaping modifications, including: • additional cedar plantings along the projects boundary line in common with Bill Gilberts southerly line • interstate style fencing along the projects boundary line in common with Bill Gilberts southerly line Please let me know if you have any questions or require clarification. Attachments M 4 S _o 3 xQ�� /� W N tµµlflI Vf y WW y �-1' ��\ � • n aQQQ�QQQ ;�" o0000000 X i W 6uI mc`v�ab"cncoe ry JI NJ '��sh, `fY ±• ` /'i, i B c LU Y �i W I j to V � v 1 — — �. 11 •1 N N LU I'I ,e rl I '4', 0 0 N N a U rn I N N 0 ONE WN G:\Active Projects\Farrell Property 0222\Dwg\03-07-04 Spear St Sketch.dwg, 04/02/2004 11:40:19 AM L' 1 O 1 I III � I III I I I� uyi I I I� W III W, $ I J O o I�� I o III C I I 8 U V U V V U V oec.n `v��i NUP'J �g � OOOOCa7 e.> O m mm C O CC 4O _ ¢a¢aa Vaaa 6��Jof c cv v`o� a 00000000 .........o�� uI C r m P aaa� yWh h i c i 0 H 6 Q 6 OOO y� 000 G N M Q N p o I m� aN L, I CC,aa� LO �N � c pQ N NN +I �1 Y c m m C G 4 1. L• I I g 'll I ,I i= s� 4 O I G:\Active Projects\Farrell Property 0222\Dwg\03-07-04 Spear St Sketch.dwg, 04/02/2004 11:40:19 AM 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING TE73 NAME MAII Mr; AnnD[=cc nn� �.��vv rRVJGI. 1 yr iry i tKtS I �!�✓ � S � � is ���,� �'�,� %''✓�z...���' ��-,-,� i�•(�,t3��L°Zg3 �1F ZOO (7y 0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE; g J—+�" NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST RiC.Vl IJca_� 14oy is IV®KG w-p6 '- if 1131CAA6L yc ot'LIAS -? -2-1 ` 50 t /DnA SPA 5P4?':50-'- eA do u.1-s z 1 ) SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 January 18, 2oo6 Lou Bresee 21 Cranwell Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. Bresee: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. �tsy K��dre�z{h Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department SOUTri BURLINGTON PLANNING & GONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 January 18, 2006 Rich & Tracy Tarrant 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Tarrant: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON) VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 January 18, 20o6 Rick Hubbard 1317 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. Hubbard: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department 1 SOUT11.BURLINGTON PLANNING & zO NING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 January 18, 20o6 Steve Vock Civil Engineering Assoc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. Vock: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. r—� VV%0-+ Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department 1 ) SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 January 18, 20o6 Mike Buscher TJ Boyle 301 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. Buscher: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. "b� 0�� Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department SOUTn BURLINGTON PLANNING & zONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 January 18, 20o6 Michael Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. Scollins: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department P ) SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 January 18, 2006 Thomas & Louise Kleh 219 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Spear Meadows — Final Plat #SD-05-96 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Kleh: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Betsy McDonough South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 19, 20o6 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Mr. Farrelll: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on January 17, 20o6 (effective 1/7/o6). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 18o days (must be submitted by July2, 2oo6) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Encl. Assistant CERTIFIED MAIL 7003 3110 0001 3598 5664 Permit Number SD- 0 `A APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Gary N & Jane G. Farrell, Karen A. Farrell, Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole Brent N. Farrell — c/o 1350 Spear Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 (863-5822)• and C. and C. Hager — 1302 Spear Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 (864-0096) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol. 274, page 280; Vol. 142, page 45-47; Vol. 391, page 285-288 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Eric F. Farrell PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 658-7400 x25, 860-3594 (fax) 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as applicant 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Spear Street 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 105066000 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) A 3-acre parcel of land with a single-family house thereon plus a separate vacant parcel containing 22 acres; plus adjoinin 1-acre parcel with a single-family house thereon. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Subdivide into 19 single-family buildinglots; ots• plus one lot with 12 multi -family units; plus 3 lots to be owned by a Homeowners Association c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Two existing single-family homes; plus 17 single-family homes; plus 12 new multi -family units. f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Restricted area along east side of Spear Street 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) 60' ROW for future connection to northern parcel owned by others 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Extension of municipal water & sewer lines 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) See Attached 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 12/31 /09 five yearsA 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of m knowle SIG TURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: ZComplete _ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date t } F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 802-863-4541 fax 802-865-1253 Memo To: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner City of South Burlington From: Eric Farrell 5 U ' Date: March 23, 2004 Re: Spear Street Project Enclosed please find a new Sketch Plan for the above referenced project revised to reflect the following changes: • Reduced the number of single-family lots from 27 to 19 (including 2 existing homes) • Added 12 multi -family condominium units on a 3.27 acre lot (formally lots 20 - 25) • Added typical house and driveway configurations to the plan to demonstrate that upon completion, the single-family lots that are perpendicular to each other, if developed thoughtfully, will not negatively impact each other • Relocated the existing driveway serving G. & J. Farrell home from Spear Street to the new street. • Eliminated the lot just east of the G. & J. Farrell home site. We believe the new plan, with a mix of single-family home sites and clustered multi- family condominium units, meets more of the expressed goals of the SEQ, while offering more home -ownership opportunities in a broader price range. After careful consideration of the relevant issues concerning connectivity of our new development to Pinnacle at Spear, we have decided to retain the street connection to Vale Drive. Please schedule us for a third "Sketch Plan' review before the DRB at its earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at my office at 658-7400 ext. 25 or 343-7055 (cell). You may also contact my associate Liz Dilley at 658-7400 ext. 14 or 343- 9242 (cell). Enclosure f _ mere a \\\\\\\\ { � t ± �6a= , a E f 6 e«®§ , ■ ? (§§§§§§( { « 2 \ ) { 2 @ uuouo� 2 ggq¥9%f� (\\((\(§ 2 G:\Acly Pr]oe!\SFrerHPropert 0222\D>¢050704Spea m Sklm2w¢0y2 /200 0$4$39AM DEPARTIVIENT OF PLIT! . Nli,% & ZONING 575 • � - CD 36 DEC `<<vl�- 20 W) C 11111ilUX UL OpUll c/o Betsy Carter REAL081 O54032aBO IN 14 01/06/06 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UP-JADLL T-3 l-GRWARO RETURN TO SENDER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Preliminary plat application #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater Burlington for a planned unit development consisting of a 13,500 sq. ft. house of worship to be built in two (2) phases, phase I being 7500 sq. ft. and phase II being 6100 sq. ft., 73 Thompson St. 2. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-95 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for a planned unit development consisting of a 54,372 sq. ft. general office building, 192 Tilley Dr. 3. Final plat application #SD-05-97 of The Snyder Custom Homes, LLC to amend a previously approved plat for a four (4) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of relocating the access drive to lot #3, 680 Nowland Farm Rd. inal plat application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows, LLC for a planned unit 4. development to subdivide a 26.19 acre parcel developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.305 acre parcel to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear St. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board December 31, 2005 I 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 Memo South Burlington Planning & Zoning To: Doug Brent, South Burlington Fire Chief From: Betsy McDonough, Planning & Zoning A i Date: January 4, 2006 6 Re: Reviews for January 17th meeting Following are three (3) projects that we would appreciate comments on for the January 17th (Tuesday) Development Review Board meeting. 1. The Rock of Greater Burlington - This is preliminary plat approval for a place of worship at 73 Thompson Street (Meadowland Business Park). 2. Pizzagalli Properties, LLC — This is a preliminary plat approval for an office building at 192 Tilley Drive. 3. Spear Meadows, LLC — This is final plat approval for a 29 unit Planned Unit Development off Spear Street (extension of Vale Drive). You reviewed this at the preliminary plat phase and made some minor comments. Please check to make sure your comments have been addressed and also add any new comments if needed. FARRELL REAL ESTATE CO. P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 To: Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington, Vermont From: Eric Farrell Date: 12/9/2005 Re: Spear Meadows Subdivision Enclosed please find the following materials intended to represent a complete application for "Final Plat" review of the above referenced project by the Development Review Board. The following materials are included in connection with this application: 1. APPLICATION FOR MASTER PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT) REVIEW • Application Fee in the amount of $ 510.00 • List of Owners of Record and Last Recorded Deeds • List of Contact Persons and Parcel ID#'s • Signature Page of Owners and Applicant • List of Abutters 2. Engineering Plans by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and Landscape Plans by TJ Boyle & Associates (Five sets at 24" x 36" and one set at 11" x 17") 3. Landscape Budget as prepared by TJ Boyle & Associates ($107,245) The plans address all of the Preliminary Play Conditions, except for (12), which will be submitted next week and (13), which will be finalized once our state Stormwater application has been completed and submitted (end of December). Street Names The main collector road will be named Vale Drive, as it is an extension of the existing Vale Drive. We propose to name the local street ending in the cul-de-sac, "Spear Meadows Lane', subject to your approval. If you determine that name to be unacceptable, I will submit one or two others for your consideration. Landscape Screening At the request of four abutting neighbors, we are proposing evergreen screening in following locations to shield those properties from vehicle headlights: 1) on the west side of Spear Street opposite the new intersection of Vale Drive to screen vehicle headlights exiting the site; 2) along the west boundary line of P. B. Grabowski & J. L. Milot and M. & M. Scollins (east of Lots 6 & 7) to shield vehicle headlights traveling east then turning south on Vale Drive; and 3) along the west boundary line of T. and L. Kleh to screen vehicle headlights exiting the local street. Southbound Turn Lane A turn lane has been provided for southbound traffic turning left onto Vale Drive, as requested by the DRB, and will be constructed concurrent with the other site infrastructure improvements. It has been designed to impact only the east side of Spear Street, so as to not affect neighboring properties or the existing Recreation Path on the west side of Spear Street. Vale Drive Cul-de-sac The plan reflects the removal of the Vale Drive cul-de-sac and the extension of the new road and Recreation Path to the south side of the turn -around with appropriate tie-ins. Pedestrian Crosswalk A 10' wide pedestrian crosswalk has been included at the intersection of Spear Street and Vale Drive with appropriate signage. Proposed Buildings All proposed buildings have been removed from the plans. The multi -family units planned for Lot 19 will be submitted for Site Plan review at a later date. Street Width The main collector road (Vale Drive) maintains a uniform width of 26 feet, except at the intersection of Spear Street, where it widens to 36 feet to allow for a left turn lane. It does not narrow to 24 feet at the wetlands, as requested, because the engineer determined that such reduction would not provide any reduction in impact on the wetlands, but would interfere with utility line extensions. The local street maintains a uniform width of 26 feet up to the cul-de-sac, where it then narrows to a uniform width of 24 feet. Pedestrian Easement At the request of an abutting neighbor, who has an existing house on Spear Street, a 10' wide pedestrian easement has been provided giving them internal access to the our neighborhood and connected neighborhoods to the east. 0 Page 2 } Existing Houses The existing house on Lot 1 will be demolished to make way for a new house fronting; on Vale Drive. The existing house and garage on Lot 20 will remain. Waivers If required, we hereby request a confirmation of our Preliminary Plat approval to building on Lots 2 and 3, which are in the SEQ Overlay District Restricted Area and to narrow the ROW width for the local road to 50 feet. Please let me know if you require any additional information or clarification. Otherwise, we ask that you schedule us before the DRB for Final Plat review at its earliest convenience. Enclosures 0 Page 3 OWNER OF RECORD Parcel A -1302 Spear Street - Gary N. Farrell Doubletree Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 802-660-7526 Parcel B -1340 Spear Street - Parcel C -1350 Spear Street - Brent Farrell 18 Irish Road Cambridge, VT 05444 802-849-9767 Brenda F. Cole 100 Chelsea Place Williston, VT 05495 802-879-3284 Karen Maklad 111 Goodridge Drive Williston, VT 05495 802-878-4460 Kevin Farrell 152 Cedar Avenue Arlington, MA 02476 781-641-4516 Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-5822 LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED Parcel A - Vol. 677 Pages 402 Parcel B - Vol. 274 Pages 440-443 Vol. 274 Pages 280-282 Parcel C - Vol.142 Pages 45-47 CONTACT PERSON Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Eric Farrell Liz Miller efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com. 658-7400 x25 658-7400 x14 860-3594 (fax) 860-3594 (fax) TAX PARCEL ID# Parcel A -1640 - 01302 R Parcel B -1640 -1340 Parcel C -1640 - 01350 R FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters November 7, 2005 Parcel Number Name & Address 1742-00033 R Larkin J Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00089 R Robert A. & Marjorie N. Skiff 89 Springhouse Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. & Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 0570-01225 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. & Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01302 R Gary N. Farrell (1302 Spear Street) Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle @ Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. & Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01331 R Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01393 R William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01404 R Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Permit Number SD- 05-� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OW ER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) QTGIC �V(k 3 APePLICA T (Nan ma� ling address, hone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. include name, address phone& fax #)_ , 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Sco cuta d ) I �f 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existin,gg,, uses an on Property (including description d size of each separate use) tX �► n(-4 -M iM I It 1 "N I a M If+ 1 + A� , MGn AN (1- � m o k, a On b) Proposed uses on property (incl de dWescription and size of eac new use and existi g uses to remain) 0 aw �I fs0, t M I AA- L 3 C&A 0S (�- I e aryl c) Total buildings uare footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) See C�rii hPd 6'y-rn c--� d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, speci if basement and mezzanine) cofc Y 1 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 1 f) Number of employees) _ & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? Q Ic(`_`�317, b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: �)u -I c) (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing q,�W square feet % Proposed (v'm square feet I % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 191 J') square feet ( --I % 2 E Proposed 2c square feet _ % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE ,_�(3 ( I 3 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT �'nn a4,i"!,I (!� 1 iC1 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: j r� I have reviewc;d t. is preliminary plat application and find it to be: /co,omplete ❑ Incomplete Director of Plarining Z ning or signee ate 4 SIG RES OF ER/S A 4Y Gary K. Fa ell -1302 Spear Street Brent Farrell -1340 Spear Street r ! , Brenda F. Cole - 1340 Spear Street Karen Maklad� /1340 Spear Street z - 4� Kevin Farrell -1340 S r Street Ga . F rrell -1350 Spear Street - a 'Z� e- , l ,�►/�/Tp rG. Farrell -1350 Spear Street SIGNATUfitE OF APPLICANT Brent Farrell for Spear Meadows, LLC CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Brent Farrell 18 Irish Road Cambridge, VT 05444 Dear Property Owner: fawt i &-UTM� Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, lv rcawish Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Brenda F. Cole 100 Chelsea Place Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 9* Q' Tmh Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Karen Madlad 111 Goodridge Drive Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ci Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Kevin Farrell 152 Cedar Avenue Arlington, MA 02476 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-41o6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, HC Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Gary & Jane Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, `BtkJA qC� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Larkin/Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (8o2)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Robert & Marjorie Skiff 89 Springhouse Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting sent to you to make you aware that a public hearingo s ur being held egardinglng the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. &TY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOl� I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 University of Vermont Campus Planning log South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, CI Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-41o6 December 30, 2005 Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Young: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 44.71 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. `CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOw ) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Douglas & Christine Franzoni W6 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Franzoni: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Michael & Mary Scollins 214 Meadowwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Scollins: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McqDTa � Donough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ms. Dencker: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, r—�H'-%4 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (8o2)846-41o6 December 30, 2005 Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 1�� QTOAM�l Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. �ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOl. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Thomas & Louise Kleh 219 Meadowwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 1\- qC ` 1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Pinnacle at Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, ?—*� �CR)t Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 William & Maureen Gilbert 1400 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, YL Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Wq-) Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. M CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, PC� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, -�(Ra* l� C vl Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 December 30, 2005 Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 1� WD(V� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VI' 05403 (802)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development abutting your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (8o2)846-4io6 December 30, 2005 Gary Farrell Doubletree Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-41o6 if you have any questions. Sincerely, -� qum)f_,� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Eric Farrell December 21, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Steve Vock PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows Dear Steve: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the final plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below, and refer also to all pertinent comments from previous correspondence on this project. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1 and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 6. Page specific comments: a. C1.1: The proposed 8" water main shall be extended to the east side of Spear Street. The fire hydrant shall be moved to the end of the main. A gate valve, stub, cap and thrust block shall be installed at the end of the main. b. C1.1: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. c. C1.3: The hydrant proposed for the cul-de-sac shall be at the end of the water main. It is not necessary to install another main line gate valve, stub, and cap beyond the hydrant. d. C 1.3: The hydrant proposed at station 118+30 should be relocated to approximately station 120+00. e. C1.3: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. f. Cl* A test hole should be performed to locate the existing water main on Vale Drive prior to connecting the proposed water main. The fire hydrant that is being relocated must have a short stub and cap installed on the existing isolation valve, and ties must be included on As-Builts. The fire hydrant must meet current specifications. g. C1.4: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. h. C1.6: A check valve vault containing one eight -inch main line and one four -inch bypass line check valve shall be installed near the proposed 24"x8" tap on Spear Street. I have enclosed a sketch of the required check valve. Please provide this Department a detail of the check valve vault and specification sheets for approval prior to construction. 7. Prior to opening the connection between Spearmeadows and Vale Drive the SBWD will be required to close the main line gate valves at Olivia Drive/Spear Street and Deerfield Drive/Spear Street, as Spear Street is pressure reduced. Prior notice to the SBWD shall be made by the contractor when the connection is complete and all tests have been completed and submitted to the SBWD. 8. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 9. Looping of all water lines shall be a design requirement. The incoming water line for this project shall be eight -inch (8") DI. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on either water main. 10. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 11. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 12. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each intersection, with a maximum of 500' between hydrants. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Fire hydrants may be Kennedy K81 A, Mueller Centurion, or Waterous Pacer. The same brand hydrant shall be used within this project. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 13. Corporations shall be Mueller B-25008 or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B-25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 14. All curb boxes shall be installed with a stainless steel rod. 15. Also enclosed is a copy of the CWD tapping application for the needed tap on the CWD 24" transmission main. Please complete boxes 3 thru 12 and return to this department for approval. The tapping fee must be paid in full prior to the tap being completed, and all requirements of the Champlain Water District must be met during the tapping process. 16. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 17. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 18. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 19. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 20. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: Spear Meadows 12-05 December 21, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Steve Vock PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows Dear Steve: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the final plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below, and refer also to all pertinent comments from previous correspondence on this project. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District 41 and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 6. Page specific comments: a. C 1.1: The proposed 8" water main shall be extended to the east side of Spear Street. The fire hydrant shall be moved to the end of the main. A gate valve, stub, cap and thrust block shall be installed at the end of the main. b. CI.1: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. c. C1.3: The hydrant proposed for the cul-de-sac shall be at the end of the water main. It is not necessary to install another main line gate valve, stub, and cap beyond the hydrant. d. C1.3: The hydrant proposed at station 118+30 should be relocated to approximately station 120+00. e. C1.3: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. f. C 1.4: A test hole should be performed to locate the existing water main on Vale Drive prior to connecting the proposed water main. The fire hydrant that is being relocated must have a short stub and cap installed on the existing isolation valve, and ties must be included on As-Builts. The fire hydrant must meet current specifications. g. CIA: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. h. C1.6: A check valve vault containing one eight -inch main line and one four -inch bypass line check valve shall be installed near the proposed 24"x8" tap on Spear Street. I have enclosed a sketch of the required check valve. Please provide this Department a detail of the check valve vault and specification sheets for approval prior to construction. 7. Prior to opening the connection between Spearmeadows and Vale Drive the SBWD will be required to close the main line gate valves at Olivia Drive/Spear Street and Deerfield Drive/Spear Street, as Spear Street is pressure reduced. Prior notice to the SBWD shall be made by the contractor when the connection is complete and all tests have been completed and submitted to the SBWD. 8. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 9. Looping of all water lines shall be a design requirement. The incoming water line for this project shall be eight -inch (8") DI. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on either water main. 10. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 11. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 12. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each intersection, with a maximum of 500' between hydrants. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Fire hydrants may be Kennedy K81 A, Mueller Centurion, or Waterous Pacer. The same brand hydrant shall be used within this project. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 13. Corporations shall be Mueller B-25008 or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B-25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 14. All curb boxes shall be installed with a stainless steel rod. 15. Also enclosed is a copy of the CWD tapping application for the needed tap on the CWD 24" transmission main. Please complete boxes 3 thru 12 and return to this department for approval. The tapping fee must be paid in full prior to the tap being completed, and all requirements of the Champlain Water District must be met during the tapping process. 16. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 17. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 18. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 19. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 20. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: Spear Meadows 12-05 RAM.. tees-000es .r.x+ 1 HOA LOT a 1 T. and L Kish LL a,d Yt Buai,a a � _- ,fso-arns - noo-00zu L_—O J r o IL_J L_J'L—J 11 r---ail--�i�— i I_--__11L—J1I_J HOA LOT a 1 T. and L Kish LL a,d Yt Buai,a a � _- ,fso-arns - noo-00zu L_—O J r o IL_J L_J'L—J 11 r---ail--�i�— i I_--__11L—J1I_J 20' Racree5aetei Eaee,,,e„t �— opef opaaa _ Z „ v,maer et spw HDALpt, ... :.:.. . W. and fA Cbwt f I I �comePW—Mpacce `\ I / �- 1 !Ct r-wrh ta4o-mn0 1 ,eeo-m302 - 0 HaNult� EdaRa. I Co,muela �Y I 0 L Hw*.# sw-maw I 1 I I _ APHIC SCALE I,a ' 1 / 11 (-L�1�1 T. and &L I Id Dwww ,ao-mao ` ! R and E LavVw s�E II �iaa-mom I C I // a and T. Ci,anm,oPo� If j j ,ee0-meal ,o'lIf I ii I 11/ I D,cC City Of �0 B Non INDEX OF SHEETS: SITE: CIA MASTER SITE PLAN C1.OA EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C1.1-CIA ROAD PLAN and PROFILE C1.5 SMR LINE CONNECTION AT SPEAR STREET SPEA"iRv MEADOWS C1.5 RATER EXTENSION PLAN and PROFILE C1.7 STORKWATER MANAGEMENT AREA SITE PLANS Cl.a TURN LANE and CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENTS C2.0 SERER and SITE DETAILS - C2.1 HATER and STORM DETAILS 12/5/2005 FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL �s �e >ETAHS E DETAILS C2A EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C3.0 SPECInCATIONS C5.1 SPECIFICATIONS - C5.2 SPECIFICATIONS APPLICANT: SITE ENGINEER: SITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: C3.3 SPECIFICATIONS ERIC FARRELL CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, lNC. T.J. BOYLE ASSOCIATES SURVEY: FARRELL REAL ESTATE P.O. BOX 485 301 COLLEGE STREET SIX PLAT 0f SURVEY - Land. of FARRELL & COLE P.O. BOX 1335 SHEL URNE, VT 05482 BURLINGTON, VT 05401 S1.1 FINAL PLAT of SUBDIVISION BURLINGTON, VT 05402 B02-985-2323 FAIL• 602-965-2271 LANDSCAPING: WEB. m .cea-vL— IA OVERALL LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN OWNERS: WETLANDS CONSULTANT: TRAFFIC CONSULTANT: L3 SG�E and LIGHTING PIS' GARY N. and JANE G. FARRELL, et al. GILMANN and BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL FUSS and O'NEILL L5 IAN LALA NDSCAPE �d LUICHTTING PLAN 0 SPEAR 1350 SPEAR STREET STREET 1 C0T?TTI CIRCLE, SUITE 5 78 INTERSTATE DRIVE L7 L7 PLANTING NOTES and DETAILS srrE DETAILS S. VT 05403 BARRE, VT 0564.1 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 - - _ _ ! _ _ _ - - -_ - if Lt VLHMUNl _ IVE 28' PAVEMENT -�`E ---7j� 71 1 I. �♦�__l -,,_�� 71, -L.edk}JA�ot par} 7'T .Sum Ord swo A ,ea -Dino I _ 40 SOUTE AST QUADRANT '•' ``�-, �� •0%e. '- _ f _ i - _ e_ _ _ 5 - /� L�� OVERLAY DISTRICT t� �, _-1'----- ...... - t-. V ® RESTRICTED AREA26' PAVEMENT ZONING BOUNDARY t - I-.a�'`" i WIDTHr 1 �1 / _-- �c \ LOT 19 , ..... snnccoNTouR /`\!� c \ Y smeue>ica - I I Pvc rrn NEW CORRIDOR HEIGHTRESTWCTM! = 38.e FEET _.. .:. (AWRAGE PRE-CONSTRUCTOIN GRADE - 392L0 FEET) —SS— GRANn SEWER ME W. eewi Al Otbert —FM— FORCE MAN WATER ME �, S --0E— OVERNOVERHEADEIEC7RIC \�� \ ��' • ` F �_\/ ,'�$� /J'`� csFuex? i / _ —UE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - -'� ! a�Y ( 2 !.~.. �__� ® -I ! RESTRICTED AREA (l ^ham — —UT— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE O �ZDNING BOUNDARY j ``F - - — \! I — c — cns ME —ST— STORM a,AINAGE ME Q✓tEll>I:,k Fazebl -A-TY SEWER CLEANOUT I �� ',eM-el SEWER MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE I I /L��`AJ1 / ' ;.I �/ / /,/•�/ J 1 �' 1 1\ 1 I 3xS HYDRANT _ _ _ CATCH SASH 'j I I I I ' INNACLE POWER POLE �` DRIVE EDGE Of WOOS I I I Hadcetl tom•\ ! � �' -- 'I /✓,��- s,o-a� I -T-�W f- t tt % l I 1 Ck,M,Mk BRby "' %i/ice I1 " I1 4 �•' r 2 S V` I neTs ceBc® RevsoN i 1 I I I I sao asso ,i i I i T. ed 1t 1 I K I PAD I I I ; a dLOks�anoM I I az/ C1.1 I I t I I I I+ s/oo FNAL PUN SUOMITTAL SAv MASTER SITE PLAN Y/ DATE nnARmc. Nnem� NOV., 2004 IQ , IciJ71- clo I TRlOJ. Rn. 0" i I I D r n RON FOR FUTURE CONNED 01D — — - — — - _ _ \ \ Pinnacle at Spear ION TO NORTHERN PARCELS •; _ —_- -- _ l • ; ace r I • �_ m � 1 i �� I I I I I I rm_O I A, �Vvl I I � I ' ILOTS I II l�I I L—LOT 13 arkinJMi o ership Lor,s I i I Lor n I LOT 1a Volume 296, Page 538 j I I 11 1 1 LOT ,1 I I I 11 I `°T" I' l �� Lorin BEN - AM LOTS ' I I ¢` si,r \ —1 I I LOT 1S POTENTIAL STORM WATER ` • I / 1 MANAGEMENT AREA LOT 9 I rwca roQEL�rtnrE L _. HOA LOT, G�' ♦ . _ -' vnrxEss '1 Lora xwEx,SPxw EEHc —.� - — — •� �_— i �! : I — •LAN_-- -»' \ / / �_ - , BU I ^r t Ounv /Bar f o"..WETLrwD llege JTso - - --.----irarraNfii-- - PPed) ? AGT :.Q.' 1/2 . . . . . . . ---------- 1 Karen, Kevin, and Brent Farrell I I . • • , • , ' , • . m and Brenda Cole I \\ ���___ I n 3d`' � POTENTIAL STORM WATER ` M779 93' 'F L_ ' MANAGEMENT AREA / Volume 274 Pages 440.443 _- _ , 79.�3'�(S (°.. _ « Volume 274 Pages 280-282 �.•• oeuFFfR ±22.3 acres _ rc uro REm—.ren POTENTIAL STORM WATER spa C. and C. Hager MEuExovvnEus er MANAGEMEN7AREA — `* �� Open Space Volume 391, • sPeuces / / �'s �_ Pages 285-23 / ygo/ / �( ems. Pinnacle at Spear 0.9acres / l W. and M. Gilbert - \ ` sPaueEs Volume 209, Pages 225-22r / Q -5i4lPl ' \ / SPRUCES I / xsruL xEw W*ExmnrE srvte • \� `- Lor9 / swrxEnvExa:uow9=.1'Fkoxc rlu;h 1 1PF l / xEouxwxrcrruEm G ley �� I' �54.. �, \V N—N— E Lorso / Lori Nr4• / �\ \ -- S/4; 1pf� iA f / / I (Bent) • ,4„ lPT / , �7 P / L J ish J ��-./ I �7 I I (Bent) , D. and L. I I L s,H;; J / � L ,% . 1 � I G. and J. Farrell / Volume 14Z Pages45.47 Young I � J I � G � �3 � ±2.9 acres / Voltntra 412, I T. and M. Page 99 Wulfson �.�rrodiiz 1eo; Found I Volume565• I TBar Found (Capped) I Pages 349-35C� I r AG I D. and C. Franzonl , (Copped) , sso— I ' Volume 211, Pages 447-448 7 Flot AG ' \ , , I I I �. ` o-riynskl I n GRAPHIC SCALE I \ \ I I and I C I l D. Muhr I N]'C�eclDker I 1 I m I Volume 218, t I r I a) 3%4" lP F£ NcrTgEF� \ rBor Found Pages 287-288 Volume 137, i I L 111h - 60 IL I I Flush \ ti (F<nt? I I I I Page 323 I l I n, j- I I h , r 1 y , it #t w: -i . 9w. i . agar/.v 7- _ �e "fit �'`' ''* ••;,� j � 'AE. b• c ., Y t� ♦.; ,:a.r ... } e`.. 4 ." � ram• �- a� � � ,gam .r ✓� �4 "'' t � � S.'-,.1%� • . ,,y,,. «. �� ♦:I'. rty*. +•, ��ti° � "E••• •4 1, rt r w. � �` � ('gip r, � ti1,,. � . ' - �.s e"�,"_)$d amw RIK OFF t OR.0 r; ; . �^fr .�• �''.,. _, i...... j 4 S♦r. -,��}� < ' / 7 +•r,Aks '•k` rr �t: ' ,. -"''�" � � / ;f —_ — - t'�" .. > i® „ -- — I ICI � f .RR J �— J :': or to c anec Hager' — • / —+ Keren,Kew,anala'- F..# P. a j 7•" m: =n , - ml, 10 1zd1, Pa9 < J • Ir � . '• AJO .:i r / R d a � ' tl. GRAPHIC SCALE•. , • <. • r 1 inch 80 it • 1 NI I N I` moo: .� a U� 1� 4 I• i. I' a � W� YCO m Ir yye a^ I� Q) I 1 1 �''7T/lh=, •'/ / '''/'"////r// ''/'','�/r'r'//i� //' ///ir'/�'�,'�/ri,/ //,//'/r/,/i/',r//i////"i/�,/'��''///7i"ce'i'�'/ �// ''/ri''/i %S'"r'i/i/ ,//i%''i �ri'/'%'rr�//�/�''''/ri/,j'/'/r /',//'//'/i/i�i'/'/i'iri/j''�"/,�'''//rrj//,'r�ii'rr/i/i��''///ii'"''/'/ri/ ,�''�///i/j�'r,rr/j/j/i'�/�r// ,/i''' '//ir/�'','/r///,''i'//r/i„/�'• '%i/' '///,i/' /.//`/�'r%r '•/�rrr//i 7�/'• '" r //r%r•,•r' //,,�''r,//r,''///,'' r!//i/''�7, �. jiW �Z A/ i' /i. /r/'' Wx% // I/// //ii' / r'i' //i 0 } W /i i:;'%;''r%r:''.'%/:''r'r/ i'''% r:''r'''' ''i ;, 'rP z mo r:;'i/; x//'/' "''//' i"/r''' /'/ err ,�/�r/'�ri/i' �/i"'err/'�i"�/'�"/i �'�� �ii,� i'i, ri ,< /,'r"�, /�/i'i, r'O /,,,r,, / / / ,r ,�,/i '' '//"/�j'�i'' �'�''�'�''i/ /j'' '�i''' i''N/i1 ''/, i'/i,'//i i 'i, // / // ,'/i / ri , /, / , / /i�if� /i / ri /i !� _ "T� /y le/�k, // r//„ /i / r, r / / i \ i'�'r/j�i�z�riii///'���ii'''//'"/iii' ij� /ji/jr//�j�' Z Z LD y Lu >/��/i ijii „ //' //' i�'i /i / i/,i /i i �� /,�, i �i /ii i ir�i/iii'/i�'' / ii'/r/�O 0 /i /i / // /,%/'/,'/r/ /'/ / '/' '/ '/ / /// '/ / //, / r/ / / / / / / , /i / ' r ''ri i,' /,/ , ,, r ,rim / ,,r ,w /i ,, / , „/ /i / /, r Q a iIM /, i'i�� i"i��/i'' i�r� i" /Z, X, /i,, / /, r,, /i rii''r/�/"//'"ram/i''//i '/iri /i''r/�i,'i Z a � /r 11"/''/r /i''i''//''/i 'LLI A/ Z Gy'jf/�'�''/i,"/'i'''i///"i'''r// Q1'ri z ��, �i/,,zi'i, x/, ��/,�,ri�, ,i��i �' cri ;C � �`p•'P�N ONd'%.'i;;/i;'//; :; �/r:;;/i :i ;'//;;,'�//;;/.';,;//,'//r :,;/r,'//r /,,/r,,�r/ //,'//,,,,//,, /r,/, /,, /, //,, rr /,,r„ , _i ? . _ �, ri ri,./i -/i /i,.///.4 �4 r.�r,/../i ./i ri,.//__// r /,__� / / �ao� t .. ✓. 4S ---J It �� �•'•' i W I ICI �II \\��� d I I ZQ �I. AS ! � ��o.�ao� ■�07 i h N I / 2 112" IPF 1.0 AG W k__y_�—_-_____ I i CO(7) 351 E _ — WETLAND BUFFER i 3' - — Vol —� CR(5) „TO(7) I LD(7) I LOT 3 0 •�. YYYYY CR(8)1 e I I �\ PG(5� ` \ � J I \ /PF _ \ sA LOT 2 IPF ' —A G A / \ / LOT 1 4 ^ y � 2 / r \ / \J i 1 / NEW OR CEDAR 1 l MATCH LINE - SHEET L2 __—�'—_----- { j LANDSCAPING LEGEND _ W W W W I � W W "k WSW •i_� W �'__� "'/✓/ PROPOSED SHADE TREE _ W W -Y LD(5) _ "T PROPOSED CONIFER TREE TO(6) WETLp,ND BUFFER I O ' QP PROPOSED SHRUB ( LD(5)- / 0 PROPOSED EVERGREEN SHRUB / HOA LOT 2 / POTENTIAL STORM WATER ' � MANAGEMENTAREA Ile 'C') SPRUCES � Z AF(7) ' / / SPRUCES 0/ PG(9) / SPRUCES EXISTING \ - CEDAR HEDGE SEE ENTRA IQCE SIG NTING PLAN I� MMF ` GRAPHIC SCALE 0.5' AG \ \ w ( IN FEET 1 inch = 30 tt / P-yr / LOT 20 / ;r APprakrakly 12' / Spear Meadowe - Spear Street, South Burlington - Planting Scheduk / Street Tree SCALE: 1/2" = 1' - 0" Cade Scientific Name C—Name Size Nafe le AF ACERx&eentere'Aulumn Blare' Autum Blaze Maple 2-2.6"Cal. B&B 5 BP BETULA papyrderm Paper Birch 6. 1o'HL B&B CLUMP 16 FP FRAXINU3 m wica'Patm W Pat —Ash 2. 2.5"Cal. B&B 6 GT GLEDITSIA ubanlhos lnemlis lialka' Halka 1-1— st 2-2.6"Cal. B&B 9 GB QUERCUS bicolor Swa While Oak 2-2.6"Ca1. B&B TREE FORM 13 OR QUERCUS rubs Red Oek 2.2.6" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 11 UA ULMUS amerkana'Primeton' Princeton American Elm 2 - 2.5" Cel. B&B SINGLE STEM / / Tree 40 / ` T I �J Cade SUOa hfic Name Canon Name Sze Sw Nafes 13 AF ACER x freemanii'Autumn Blaze' Autumn Blaze Mae 2 - 2.6' Cal. B&B 5 AS ACER saccharum'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Ma 2 - 2.6' Col. B&e 10 SN BETULA a River Birch 6. 10'HL B&B CLUMP 3 SP BETUUI 'era PaparBirch 6. Iof HL B&B CLUMP 1 CC CRATAEGUS cru alll inennis'Cwmdee Crusader Haxthom 2" Col. B&B or Cord. 4 OT GLEDITSIA trkanthoe lnenne'Haiks' Halka Hone 2. 2.6"Cal. B&B 68 LD LARD( decklua Larch 6. V HL 8&B COLLECTED 1 MSC MAGNOLIA stellata'Cenlannial' lCentennial Magnolia I 6.10'HL B&B ZO PA PICEA ablaa[No rwa Spruos 8 - V HL B&B 74 PO PICEA glauca Whites ra 5-B'HL IA COLLECTED 7 OB CUERCUS bcolor S1va White Oak 2 - 2.5' Cal. B&B I TREE FORM 2 OR QUERCUS ntbra Red Oak 2 - 2.6" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 14 3A SALIX alba 70191W lGolden Weeping Willow 1314'Col. B&B 17 TC TSUGA canaderde Canadian HaMhonle 3.4'HL B88 FIELD LOC. 1 1 1 / Shrubs � 1 / 1 I 1 I 3 II rp Gg3 imp-r°mE!nnwiA OO�nJdw Code Scientific Name Canon Name Size Spec Notes 42 CO CEPHALANTHUS occklantalis Budon bush 30' 03 Cont. 10 CA CLETHRA sinnolla surmxssweel 30• #5 Cont. 62 CR CORNUS racemoae 3.4' HL B&B 30 IVILEX venkdlata Winterbe 3' B&B 7 JHB JUNIPERUS horizonlalis'Blue Chid Blue Chip Juniper 15-16' #3 Cont. 10 JV JUNIPIPRUS virainiana'Gre Owl' Grey Owl Jun 24" B&B 66 TO THWA oocidentalis Arb—ilae 6 - 8' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 20 TON THUJA oxidenlalis N0 " Dark Green Arborvltas 5 -V HL B&B 14 VD VIBURNUM denlalum Arrowwood Viburnum 3.4'HL I B&B or ConL B VT VIBURNUM trYobum American Gan sh 3-4'HL S&Bor;h / I� / U V OI L! u M Perennial.Code Sclawifk Name Common Name Size Nof" \ w �] 16 HH .ULYMw 1S" 1Gelbn I 18.O.C. @©[ 3. UNU UT010O m I "DAYLILY MIX TO BE EQUAL PARTS OF HEMEROCALLIS'Flava', Green Flutter, AND Nyperkn' Applicant: Eric Farrell landscapearchitects . planningconsultants m b March 29 Z006 PO Box 1335 a a. SPEAR MEADOWS FL2 Burlington, VT 0-1402 301 college street a burlirgton a verrriont a 05401 802 e658 e3555 http://—.gboAe.com t^ = 30' Landscape and Lighting Plan I z J C. Shand et al Volume 405, Pages 726-728 NV FF 20 Recreation& �irldn t, 359.08 o \\ \\ \\ \\ act\\ \ \ \It IL I ff- \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\laneall I I I 1 \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IV \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I , I Larkin/l�\� P am\\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ LOT16 LOT 17 I ' I LOT 18 Vol0.f/ I I I tne\\��ca`7`C\8\\ I I N� I I ITNESS PLANTINGS TO DELINEATE STORMW `TEFJ FACILITY & TO(5) \rLAND BUFFER WITH INTERMITTENT SPLIT IL i ENC,ING 1 I N LD(fi' — — TO(s) — co(s) — / W W /\\ \ \ \\ ♦ \ \\ \ \ \\ ♦ \ \ \ \ ♦ \ \ ♦ \ \ ♦ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ \ V \ ♦ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ♦ ♦ \\ \ \\ \ \ `� ♦ `� POTENTIAL STORM WATER J / W •+• /\�\ \� \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ `\ \ `\ `\ \ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�/\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ `\ `\ \ LD MANAGEMENTAREA HOA LOT 1 _ _ _ _ — — i / /icy' W W W W W / •D`\ \ `\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\\\ `\ \ \\\ \� \ \`\ \� \ \\\ `� \ `\ \ `\ \ `\� \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ `\ \ `\ \ \\� \ \\\ \�� ,\ \\\ `\ \ \ LD �i V W ' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W i W� \ \ �\ \`\ \ `\ \\`\ \ `\ \\`\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\� \`\\\ `\ \\\\\ `\ \\`\\ `\ \\`\\ `\ \ `\� \`\ \ `\� \ \\ \ `\ \\`\ \ `\ \\`\ \ `\ \ `\ \ \\� \`\\ \ `\ \\`\\\ \ \\`\\ `\ \ \\ \♦ -T--y W W W W W W W W W W W W W CR(5) -- W' W W W W W W W W W W W W •Y W W ^� ``�\ �\.0 \ `\ \ `\ \ ` ` `\ \ \`� \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ `\� \ \`� \� \`\�\ `\ \ `\\ `\ \ `\ `\ \ \`\\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ \ `\\ \ � \ `\ \ \`\\ \\\ ``\ \ `\\ `\ \ �\ `\ \ \ /�W W W W W W Y W W W W W W W W •Y W W W W W \W W \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I // W / W W W •Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W •Y /\\� ` Y\ `\�\ \\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\� \ `\\ `\ \ `\` \\ \ \\` `` ` `\` `` `\`\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\\ \ "\`\ \ `\ \ \\ \ `\\ `\ \ `\\ \ '� - __-�I/ W W •Y W W W W W W W W J•Y W W W W W/y.�� W •L W � \W \ Vr \`k \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ \` W ...�..i W W W W W W W�W W W W W W W W - W W .. �•'-.....F-F" J W W ��W\� W W W W •Y W W W W W �✓ W W WE'YLANDW W W W .. rV� I W W W W W W W �.. •T ��D' ��•... _T..j.j�j' . �'...� W W W W W W JW \ W W W W W W W W W i W '' W W W W W �+�`W \\ W W W Y W W W W W W •Y W W W W W � < �\\ W \ \ W\ `\ MATCH LINE- SHEET L4 \ \ `W \ \ \\ \ \\ \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \`\ \ `\\ \ `\ \ `\ \\`\ \ `\ \ `\\ `\ �\\\\\` � ; `\\\`\� \ \`\ `� \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ ` \ \\\ \ ``\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ `\ \ • pno rq. /A-\Q- pr2no WIE no H j y GRAPHIC SCALE n HQT ( IN FEET) `�' OLJV� LI �VV LI �OIJV 1 Inch = 30 IL M. Gilbert Pages 225-226 INSTALL NEW INTERSTATE STYLE FENCE ALONG BOUNDARY ALONG SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF GILBERT PARCEL PG(10) INSTALL NEW VINYL FENCE ALONG BOUNDARY ON YOUNG PARCEL (FENCE TO MEET APPROVAL OF PROPERTY OWNER) I 1 � MATCH LINE - SHEET L3 — . \ \ \ \ \ , . \ \ \ '� \ \ \ x \ CO(3) IV(I)`plc`\ A \\\`\\ W W W W W W W W W W W W � W W W W W W W ` CR(S)t POTENTIAL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA LD(5) \ / _ 5` \LD ` 3 \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \`\ \P"l C�\ `�>\ `\ \ \ `�\\\ \�\\``\ �P �\ \��\�\ `K` l �\ `\ \ `\\ ��\ `\` \\ \\ ♦\ `�\ `�\\\ \\ \\ \\ `�\ `�\\\ \ N tq \ C�NIN6 W 46tE: L'�QQX 19 G0NTAI(`1q 1 N NIT1�llNli yN 8'\ \ ` \ \ \ �\ `� \ \\\ `� \ `\\ \ \ \\\ ` ` \� `� \ \� \ `� ♦ \ > \ \ \ ♦ \ \ `� \ `� \ \\ \ \ ♦ \ . • \....>......\.\... \ \ fEQIL GS iy-IIS'` NL\YY1C GEL,,�4G D \ \ ` ` \ > \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ` �\ \ \ ♦ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ ♦ \ \ il(Ib\BE\ FIN\ERF&1 111AF.,l,1PPF�bVA1i.\\ >\\ \\` \�I\ ` ` \ `�\ `\ \ `\\ `� \ `\\ \ \ \\\ ♦ `! `� \ >� ♦ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ > \ `\ \ `� \ `� \ > `� \ \ > \ \ \ \ \ \ -49>\ MG31PIP OO W&L 0 [. M HOT P012 OUV�4G3 • 050306 Applicant: Eric Farrell landscape architects . planning consultants mjb March 29, 2005 SPEAR MEADOWSPo Box 1335 T r Burlington, VT 05402 301 college street . budirlgton . Vermont . 05401 W2.658 .3555 http:// w gboyle.� 1• = W Landscape and Lighting Plan LJ i St. Clair Group, Inc. 15840 Lakeview Court Grosse Pointe, MI 48230 May 16, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: This letter authorizes Richard M. "Rick" Hubbard to represent St. Clair Group, Inc., the owner of property at 1317 Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont in discussions regarding the proposed "Spear Meadows -Farrell — 20 Lot Subdivision" and the addition of a left turn lane on Spear Street approximately opposite our 1317 Spear Street property. Mr. Hubbard currently leases the 1317 Spear St. property from the St. Clair Group. In connection with the above, this letter of authorization is intended to include, but not be limited to, discussions on our behalf between Mr. Hubbard and the developer of Spear Meadows and its consultants, the City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning, the Development Review Board and the Department of Public Works. Sincerely, St. CIair�ro Inc. By: R Fridholm President SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 February 23, 2006 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Minutes - Spear Meadows Dear Eric: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved January 17, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. minutes from the If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. erely, Betsy McDo origh Planning Zoning Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-95 until 7 February. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater Burlington for a planned unit development consisting of a 13,000 sq. ft. house of worship to be built in two phases, phase 1 being 7500 sq. ft. and phase 2 being 6100 sq. ft., 73 Thompson Street: Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to affirm that they will build what they show in the elevations. Mr. Adams said they would with the exception that what is shown as stone will be brick. Mr. Dinklage said they would have to identify a snow storage area out of the buffer. Mr. Adams said they will. Mr. Dinklage asked if the stormwater retention pond is large enough for phase 2. Mr. Adams said it is. The applicant requested a 16% parking waiver. Ms. LaRose noted parking numbers in staff notes are based on the daycare and phase 1. Mr. Belair said he has a concern with approving the addition without seeing it. He had thought the Board would be approve it with full parking for the addition. If not, he felt the addition should not be approved. Mr. Dinklage felt the Board would want to see elevations, location of parking, etc., for phase 2. After some discussion members agreed to amend the motion as follows: 3f. The site plans shall be revised to remove all references to signs and all references to the Phase 2 addition. Ms. LaRose noted that the City Engineer has not yet reviewed the plans but will do so on Thursday. He will probably have comments for the applicant. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater Burlington subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows, LLC, for a planned unit development to subdivide a 26.19 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.305 acre parcel to be developed with six two-family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. Mr. Farrell showed the location of a new public street and cul de sac. There will be 3 parcels of land, the 2 single family homes and a lot with the new units. Mr. Farrell also showed a connection to Vale Drive. He noted that the City Manager suggests keeping the cul de sac as a traffic calming measure, but Mr. Farrell said they don't own the land to -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 make that work. He felt they could do something else for traffic calming. Mr. Dinklage suggested an island to divide the 2 lanes. He also suggested further discussion with the Public Works people to build in traffic mitigation on the new part of Vale Drive or in the reconstruction of the cul de sac. Mr. Farrell noted the existing house has an access to the cul de sac and there wouldn't be any access to that house from one direction. Mr. Scollins suggested that a 3-way stop at the first intersection would serve the purpose. Mr. Dinklage said that would have to go through the City Council. Mr. Kupferman asked if the road would be built in the first phase. Mr. Farrell said they would build it through. They could sell lots when the road is passable though not necessarily finished. They will also widen Spear St. on the east side. No private property is involved in this. There will be two lanes coming out of the project, one going in. At the request of the neighbor across the street, they designed a raised berm to keep lights from cars from hitting the house. Mr. Hubbard, agent for the property owner across the street, suggested this could be a condition of the approval. Mr. Farrell noted they also did some screening of other homes with a cedar hedge. Mr. Kleh asked if there will be room left for the bike path. Mr. Farrell said there would. Mr. Dinklage asked how existing vegetation will be protected. Mr. Bresee of the Rec Path Committee, said there were two issues: a. Would the bike path interfere with the tree line? The answer was no. b. With new trees near the path, will they "lift" the path? Mr. Farrell said there is a 7-foot strip which should be OK. Mr. Farrell didn't feel neckdowns at crossings would meaningfully protect the wetlands. They would also make utility installation difficult. Mr. Vock said gas, electric, etc., need to maintain certain "isolations." Mr. Belair said it is such a short distance he wouldn't push for it. Mr Belair noted a section of the sewer line that doesn't comply with the ordinance. He said he spoke with the engineer today and he would explain the issue to the City Engineer. There is a stipulation to cover this. Mr. Vock said he talked with Bruce Hoar who is comfortable with it. Mr. Dinklage said there would have to be an easement with copies to the city. Mr. Scollins said he is concerned that the proposed density is not compatible with what is currently existing. He also noted there is a Master Plan for a north -south roadway to go into Swift Street, not Spear St. as this proposes. He felt it would make sense to postpone this development until an access to Swift is available. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 17 JANUARY 2006 Mr Scollins also noted that this land is contiguous with land that is farmed by UVM. He said he tried to buy the land and turn it over to UVM. He was concerned that there has been no exploration of the idea of turning the land over to the University in some way. Mr. Tarrant asked for plantings between the town house lot and the property he and his wife recently bought. Mr. Farrell showed where general plantings would be and noted there would be additional plantings with the building of each lot. The motion was amended to add the following stipulation: In the process of reconstructing the cul de sac at the end of the current Vale Drive, the applicant shall construct traffic calming measures acceptable to the South Burlington Public Works Director and the South Burlington Fire Department. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Final plat Application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. I -FA 97051 �- D;71 Date -5- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 19, 2005 Application received: December 9, 2005 FARRELL — 20- LOT SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-05-96 Agenda #8 Meeting Date: January 17, 2006 Applicants/Owners Owners Eric Farrell Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell, et al. PO Box 1335 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05402 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Propertv Information T.J. Boyle Associates Tax Parcel 1050-66000-R 301 College Street SEQ District Burlington, VT 05401 +_ 26.1 Acres Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six (6) two (2) family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street. The Development Review Board reviewed the initial sketch plans for the proposed project at the meeting on April 20, 2004 (minutes attached). The Master Plan and Preliminary Plat approvals were granted on May 5, 2005 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose, Planning and Zoning Assistant Betsy McDonough, and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 9, 2005 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Zonin'' -District Re uired , Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 SF 15,539 SF Lot # 7 Max. Density 1.2 units/acre 1 A 9 units/acre Max. Building Coverage 15% 6.7% Max. Overall Coverage 30% 22% Min. Front Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. - Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. Max. Building Height 40 ft. <40 ft. 4 SUBDIVISION CRITERIA zoning compliance Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans and comments are available from Jay Nadeau in a letter dated December 21, 2005. 1. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated December 21, 2005. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. City Engineer Bill Szymanski has reviewed the plans and comments are available in a memorandum dated January 12, 2006. 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer as outlined in his memorandum dated January 12, 2006. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 3. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 28' wide public street in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 28' and a minimum right-of-way width of 60'. The proposed public street connecting the proposed collector street to the cul-de-sac in the southwest portion of the property will be a local public street. The plans show a 50' wide right-of-way and a 26' pavement width. The plans do not reflect a pavement width reduction to 24 feet when crossing a wetland. The applicant opposes this pavement reduction for engineering reasons. The applicant will have his engineer at the meeting to explain the reasons why. 4. The final plat plan shall be revised to reduce the widths of the pavement on both streets to 24 feet where they cross a wetland. Circulation throughout the proposed development is sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 7th Edition, 19 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 19.19 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic and 12 duplex units are estimated to add 6.24 P.M peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic, for a total of 25.43 vtes during the P.M. peak hour. This development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Fuss and O'Neill CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Associates, which indicates that the proposed project is estimated to generate 33 P.M. peak -hour vehicle trip ends. Fuss and O'Neill is also the traffic engineering firm that produced the Spear Street Corridor Study, so its recommendation should conform to those outlined in the applicant's traffic impact study. A left turn lane is shown on Spear Street at the project's entrance. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadways will cross the wetlands on the northern and southern side of the property. The South Burlington Natural Resource Committee reviewed the plans for the proposed project at their meeting on April 7, 2005 (minutes attached). They recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. there should be no application of pesticides within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 2. there should be no mowing within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 3. the natural vegetation should be retained within the wetlands and their 50' wide buffers; 4. the road widths at the wetland crossings should be permitted at the narrowest width permissible by the Development Review Board; 5. the NRC should review the plans again prior to final approval. The South Burlington Natural Rescource Committee met a second time to discuss this project on January 5, 2006. The committee recommended no additional conditions. 6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Natural Resources Committee as requested at the April 7 2005 and January 5, 2006 meetings. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staff's opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to be located. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and finds them to be acceptable as noted in his letter dated January 13, 2006 (attached). He asks that the applicant abide to the comments in his letter dated October 31, 2003 (attached) 7. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Chief as outlined in his letters dated January 13, 2006 and October 31, 2003. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus, the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, a 10' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property and to the property to the north. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the plans at its meeting on December 1, 2003. They approved the proposed recreation path along the easterly boundary of the project discussed above. In their letter dated December 2, 2003 (attached), they request that the proposed sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street be replaced with a 10' wide recreation path, which is consistent with the Official City Map. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. The applicant submitted an adequately prepared landscaping plan for both the street trees and the site landscaping. In addition, an adequately prepared landscape budget was submitted (attached). The street trees have a value of $38,640 and the site landscaping has a value of $68,605. The applicant does not need to submit the estimated building costs for the two-family buildings for determination of the minimum landscaping requirement at this time as no buildings are being proposed with this application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and made comments in a memorandum dated January 3, 2006. 9. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist, prior to recording. Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. The lots depicted on the plans are in compliance with this requirement. Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. The plans depict that a portion of lot #19 falls in the Scenic View Protection District D and indicates the height limit to be 36.6 feet above the average pre -construction grade. SEQ Restricted Area Lots #1-3 and #20 of the subject property fall within a Southeast Quadrant "restricted area". Currently, single-family dwellings exist on Lots #1 and #20 (the house on lot #1 is proposed to be demolished). However, Lots # 2 and #3 are undeveloped. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may allow development activities to occur in the "restricted areas" provided the Development Review Board determines that such development activities are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant, which is outlined in Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant is requesting approval to develop lots #2 and #3 which lie in a "restricted area". It is staff's position that allowing the reconstruction of a house on lot #1 and the development activities proposed for lots #2 & 3 will be in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant. Furthermore, the Land Development Regulations are about to be amended to eliminate the restricted area designation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Street Lights The applicant is proposing street lights along both streets. The fixtures are downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 16 foot poles with 150 watt metal halide lamps. Other The applicant has submitted enhanced 9-1-1 numbers which have been approved by the Enhanced 9-1-1 Coordinator. Willow Tree Lane was the street name approved by the Planning Commission on December 20, 2005, which will serve the multi -family units. The main road through the development will be called Vale Drive. 10. The final plat plans shall be revised to show street names and enhanced 9-1-1 numbers, prior to recording. The project also includes boundary adjustments with two (2) properties to the south. Fencing is proposed around the stormwater management ponds. The details of this fencing shall be submitted prior to recording the final plat plan. This fence should be similar to the fencing used at the Heatherfields project on Dorset Street. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat Application #SD 05-96, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document. Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 4. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-28 of Provost Real Estate, LLC and Robert & Joyce Snyder for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) subdividing a 1.02 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two lots of 0.27 acres and 0.75 acres, 2) subdividing a 0.50 acre lot developed with a single family dwelling into two 0.25 acre lots, 3) combining the undeveloped 0.25 acre lot with the adjacent 0.75 acre lot to create a 1.0 acre lot, and 4) constructing two two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot, and 4) constructing two two-family dwellings on the 1.0 acre lot,10 and 14 Shunpike Road: Mr. Homsted said there have been no changes since Preliminary Plat. They have worked out all issues with the Fire Chief and City Engineer. They will have a fire hydrant in the development and partially sprinkler buildings (near the furnaces on the lower level). Mr. Boucher moved to approve final plat application #SD-05-28 of Provost Real Estate, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-29 and Final Plat Application #SD-05-30 of Anthony Basiliere for a planned unit development to subdivide a 0.26 acre parcel developed with two single family dwellings into two lots of 0.13 acres each, 21 and 23 Meadow Road: Mr. Basiliere noted this started as 2 houses on I lot. They want to sell one off, and the only way they can do this is as a PUD. Mr. Belair said staff has no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-29 and Final Plat Application #SD-05-30 of Anthony Basiliere subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Master Plan Application #MP-05-01 and Preliminary Plat Application for a planned unit development to subdivide 26.1 acres developed with two single-family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and 2) a 3.34 acre lot to be developed with six two-family dwellings, 1302-1350 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell said the plan is the same as at Sketch Plan Review. Two lots have existing single family homes. The road intersects Spear and connects to Vale Drive. They are talking with UVM about connecting water, but CWD would prefer they connect at one of the private homes. The applicant will talk with CWD about this. -2- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 Landscaping has been done to please neighbors. Buildings are not yet designed. Mr. Dinklage asked if there will be open areas owned in common. Mr. Farrell said there will be 3 lots which will basically represent stormwater management lots. He showed these on the plan. They will be owned in common and will be the responsibility of the association to maintain. The developer will rebuild the cul de sac at the end of Vale Drive. There will just be a straight thru street. Mr. Dinklage felt that neighbors on Vale Dr. should be made aware of this. Mr. Farrell said Public Works wants the cul de sac eliminated. The applicant will also remove the curb. The city will still own the circle. Mr. Cimonetti noted this area is a "blend point" for the rec path. He felt special consideration will be needed as rec path traffic will be mixing with road traffic. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to meet with the Rec Path Committee to see how this can best be done. He felt signage should be included in the plan. Mr. Farrell showed the 3 stormwater management areas. After water is treated, it goes back into the drainage way. The areas may be fences for safety. Mr. Kleh reminded the applicant that he had agreed to build screening for headlights. Mr. Farrell said they do agree to do that, possibly with a hedge. Mr. Dinklage asked that this be worked out with the Arborist and neighbors. A resident expressed concern that this will be done and noted some things the Golf Course people agreed to do were never done. Mr. Dinklage said if it appears on a plan, the city can enforce it. Mr. Cimonetti noted the Rec Path Committee is pleased with the location of the path. He noted the Committee is talking with UVM regarding having the ability to extend the path. Ideally, they would like the path separated from the street by a green strip, but they don't want to disturb the tree -line. Mr. Robertson noted that Bruce Hoar wants 5 ft. between the street and the path. That is in the draft motion. Ms. Muhr asked if consideration has been given as to when the rec path exits onto Spear St. She suggested crosswalks. Mr. Dinklage suggested a pedestrian light/signal. Mr. Farrell noted the wetlands are all Class 2 and they will need permits to cross. He would like a 24 ft. crossing. The rest of the road will be 26 ft. or more. Members wanted the road as narrow as possible in the wetland. Mr. Dietrich then presented his traffic study. Traffic was counted at Nowland Farm Rd, Spear St. and Cedar Glen. They did a 5-year projection and added in all programmed development. During the afternoon peak hour (4:30-5:30 p.m.), they estimate a total of 33 trip ends. Based on other counts, 70% of traffic would go north to Dorset St., 10% south. It is assumed that Vale Drive traffic would go out through this site. -3- i DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 MAY 2005 Mr. Dietrich said this will improve the level of service at Nowland Farm Road in the morning. There is adequate sight distance at the driveway, but they recommend the hedges be cut back. The left turn lane need is a "grey area." Mr. Cimonetti noted that when Pinnacle was put in, Spear St. was widened within the city right-of-way. Long-time property owners have fences right on the city line. This "killed" the rec path there. The proposed plan comes out at the Bailey house with a white picked fence. Mr. Cimonetti felt the rec path issue has to be solved there so a cyclist isn't faced with cars. Members want a left turn lane and the rec path. The draft motion was amended as follows: • Stipulation # 10 was added to read: The site plan review shall be required only for lot #19. • Previous stipulation # 10 becomes # 11. • Stipulation 2f was added to read: The plan shall be revised to remove the proposed buildings on Lot #19. • Stipulation #7 was amended to add the words "duplex units" to the first line. • Stipulation 2g was added to read: The plan shall be revised to show a southbound left turn lane at the project entrance on Spear Street. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve Master Plan MP-05-01 and Preliminary Plat application as amended above. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan Application #SD-05-13 of J.G. Architects to amend a previously approved plan for a 2584 sq. ft. auto service and repair facility. The amendment consists of constructing a 2344 sq. ft. addition, 11 Commerce Avenue: Mr. Goodrich said they want to add on to the back and side of the building. A Class 3 wetland strip will be eliminated. The Natural Resources Committee is OK with this. No other issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SD-05-13 of J.G. Architects subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. December 21, 2005 Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Steve Vock PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Spear Meadows Dear Steve: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the final plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below, and refer also to all pertinent comments from previous correspondence on this project. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As your project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1 and the Village of Jericho, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the `Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 6. Page specific comments:, a. C 1.1: The proposed 8" water main shall be extended to the east side of Spear Street. The fire hydrant shall be moved to the end of the main. A gate valve, stub, cap and thrust block shall be installed at the end of the main. b. C1.1: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. c. C1.3: The hydrant proposed for the cul-de-sac shall be at the end of the water main. It is not necessary to install another main line gate valve, stub, and cap beyond the hydrant. d. C1.3: The hydrant proposed at station 118+30 should be relocated to approximately station 120+00. e. C1.3: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. f. C l A: A test hole should be performed to locate the existing water main on Vale Drive prior to connecting the proposed water main. The fire hydrant that is being relocated must have a short stub and cap installed on the existing isolation valve, and ties must be included on As-Builts. The fire hydrant must meet current specifications. g. C1.4: The point of crossing between the water line and stormwater lines shall be centered on the water line, similar to the Water/Sewer Crossing Detail. h. C1.6: A check valve vault containing one eight -inch main line and one four -inch bypass line check valve shall be installed near the proposed 24"x8" tap on Spear Street. I have enclosed a sketch of the required check valve. Please provide this Department a detail of the check valve vault and specification sheets for approval prior to construction. 7. Prior to opening the connection between Spearmeadows and Vale Drive the SBWD will be required to close the main line gate valves at Olivia Drive/Spear Street and Deerfield Drive/Spear Street, as Spear Street is pressure reduced. Prior notice to the SBWD shall be made by the contractor when the connection is complete and all tests have been completed and submitted to the SBWD. 8. The above referenced CAD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The Superintendent may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 9. Looping of all water lines shall be a design requirement. The incoming water line for this project shall be eight -inch (8") DI. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on either water main. 10. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water.pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new main shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. 11. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or a Department approved equal grip ring. 12. Fire hydrants shall be placed at each intersection, with a maximum of 500' between hydrants. Fire hydrant assemblies shall consist of an anchor tee connected directly to a six-inch RW gate valve, the appropriate length of 6" DI pipe, the fire hydrant, and appropriate thrust block. All hydrants shall meet the aforementioned CWD Specifications, and a hydrant flag shall be supplied with each hydrant. Hydrant shall have all drains plugged prior to installation. Fire hydrants may be Kennedy K81A, Mueller Centurion, or Waterous Pacer. The same brand hydrant shall be used within this project. Note: Waterous fire hydrants must be installed with a "Boston Operating Nut." 13. Corporations shall be Mueller B-25008 or Cambridge brass. Curb stops shall be Mueller B-25209 or Cambridge brass. All brass unions and adapters shall be Mueller or Cambridge brass. 14. All curb boxes shall be installed with a stainless steel rod. 15. Also enclosed is a copy of the CWD tapping application for the needed tap on the CWD 24" transmission main. Please complete boxes 3 thru 12 and return to this department for approval. The tapping fee must be paid in full prior to the tap being completed, and all requirements of the Champlain Water District must be met during the tapping process. 16. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 17. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 18. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 19. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 20. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Doug Brent Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: Spear Meadows 12-05 )Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-41o6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Spear Meadows Spear Street 1/12/o6 1. Cedar hedge along Spear Street at lot 20 shall be moved after lot is regraded and before Spear Street entrance is constructed. 2. Down stream sewer mains must be checked for capacity to handle the flow from this development. 3. The existing water and sewer services to lot 20 shall be shown on the plans. 4. Street R.O.W. concrete monuments shall be shown on the plans. 5. Curbs at driveways shall be depressed with a i 1/2 inch reveal. 6. Bituminous concrete road pavement shall have a thickness of 4 inches (2 1/2 inch base course, 1 1/2 inch surface course). 7. Lots 1 through 9 should be sewered with a gravity main in center of the street. The set up as shown on the plans is a violation of the City Sewer Ordinance. There should be a pumping station at about sta. 104 serving these 9 lots. This station shall be privately maintained by the homeowners. It shall have provisions in the piping for an emergency pump hook-up. George Dow of the City Wastewater Department shall review the design. SouW)Burlin ton Fire De ax4ment g p 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief January 13, 2006 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 054033 e cl: Re: Farrell Develop na,cnt / Spear slrcct,: Dear Juli: �M I have reviewed the final plans or the proposed construction of the planned residential neighborhood on Spear Street. The plains seem to be OK. The developer should make sure to abide with the recommendation letter of October 31, 2003. If they have any other issues please lim/c them contact me. Should you need any further information on this project please f-ccl free to contact me. do mc. el Jas S. Brent � ,, � # " Fire Chief � k Sou. 1► Burlington Fire Dep, itment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief October 31, 2003 Ms. Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Farrell Development ! Spear Street Dear Juli: I have reviewed iheplansfior the proposed construction of the planned residential neighborhood on Spear Street. I have also made a site visit to try to envision the siting of this project. The plans seem to be OK and -I have the following recommendations: 1. Number and location of fire hydrants to;be determined by the South Burlington Water Department. Actual final spotting of said hydrants to be done jointly with SBFD. 2. Tree heights and locations shall not block aerial ladder rescue access to upper floor windows. At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. Should you need any further assistance on this proj'eaplease feel free to contact me. tcely, Douglas . Brent g Fire Chief CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE MINUTES OF April 7, 2005 The South Burlington Natural Resources Committee met on Thursday, April 7th, 2005 at 7:30 P.M. Members Present: Peter Jones, Bill Schuele, and Chris Shaw. Others Present: Associate Planner Brian Robertson, Julian Goodrich, Alan Brusoe, Eric Farrell The meeting was called to order with a quorum of committee members present at approximately 7:10 P.M. Alan's Auto — Site Plan #SP-05-13 Julian introduced the project and explained the site layout to the Committee. He explained how the drainage and overall runoff on the property works, pointing out the collection pond to the west of the subject property. Peter inquired about site conditions during heavy rain, and wanted to know how the applicant anticipated the site to handle heavy rain with the additional impervious surface proposed through this project. Julian responded that the large amount of pervious surface that would remain on the site would adequately handle heavy rains. Alan explained that the Class III wetland that is proposed to be impacted is a result of the surface runoff accumulating at the end of the pavement, which created and artificial wetland that served as a drainage way. Julian explained that a similar artificial wetland and drainage way would reestablish at the end of the proposed pavement boundary. The Committee agreed that the proposed impacts are reasonable and justifiable. Due to the anticipated re-establishment of the artificial wetland, the Committee did not see it necessary to recommend and mitigation measures. Therefore, the Committee recommended approval of the project as submitted to the Development Review Board. The motion passed unanimously 3-0. Spear Meadows — Master Plan #MP-05-01 Eric explained the project and gave an overview of the site. He explained where the wetland boundaries and buffers were located, and stated that his wetland consultant believes the wetland on the south side of the property are class II, while the wetland on the north side of the property is class III. Eric stated that the main difference between the classifications of the wetlands is that he will have to obtain a CUD from the State if the northerly wetland is a class III. He also explained that the proposed roadways will cross the wetlands at the points of least impact, in terms of area. The Committee also discussed the proposed culverts for the wetland crossings. Peter City of South Burlingtor, ' Natural Resources Committee Minutes of April 7, 2005 Page 2of3 suggested that Eric consider wetland crossing that would be "wildlife friendly." Eric agreed to research these "wildlife friendly" crossings. The Committee also discussed the stormwater management systems on the property. Eric explained, in very general terms, how they would work and which lots were served by which detention pond. The Committee recommended approval to the Development Review Board for the master plan and preliminary plat plan, with the following conditions: 1. there should be no application of pesticides within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 2. there should be no mowing within the wetlands or their 50' wide buffers; 3. the natural vegetation should be retained within the wetlands and their 50' wide buffers; 4. the road widths at the wetland crossings should be permitted at the narrowest width permissible by the Development Review Board; 5. the NRC should review the plans again prior to final approval. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:00 P.M. The next meeting was set for Thursday, May 5r", 2005 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall. Respectfully Submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Chris Shaw, Clerk T. J. Boyle Associates "-*N r1\ Spear Meadows - Spear Street, South Burlington - Planting Schedule 12/8/2005 Chan# T- QfY - - - Code Scientific Name Common Name Size S;Pec Notes 13 AF ACER x freemanii 'Autumm Blaze' Autumm Blaze Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 14 AR ACER rubrum 'Red Sunset' Red Sunset Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 BP BETULA papyrifera Paper Birch 8 -19 Ht. B&B CLUMP 16 FP FRAXINUS pennsylvanica'Patmore' Patmore Ash 2 - 2.5' Cal. B&B 9 GB GINKGO biloba'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 6 GT GLEDITSIA tricanthos inermis 'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2 - 2.5" Cal. 7 PSA 1PRUNUSsargentti Sargent Cherry 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 8 QB IQUERCUS bicolor Swamp White Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 15 OR IQUERCUS rubra Red Oak 2- 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 12 UA I ULMUS amencana'Prinoeton' Princeton American Elm 2 -2.5" Cal. B&B SINGLE STEM Code Scientific Name Common Name Sae Spec Notes 13 AF ACER x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Autumm Blaze Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 AS ACER saccharum'Green Mountain' Green Mountain Sugar Maple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 10 BN BETULA nigra River Birch 8 -19 Ht. B&B CLUMP 3 BP BETULA papyrifera Paper Birch 8 - IV Ht. B&B CLUMP 1 CC CRATAEGUS crusgalli inemds'Crusadee Crusader Hawthorn 2" Cal. B&B or Cont. 4 GT GLEDITSIA tricanthos inennis'Halka' Halka Honeylocust 2 -2.5" Cal. B&B 57 LD LARIX decidua Larch 6 - 8' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 20 PA PICEA abies Norway Spruce 6 - 8' HL B&B 79 PG PICEA glauca White Spruce 5 - 6' Ht. B&B COLLECTED 6 PSY PINUS slyvestris Scotch Pine 6 - 8' Ht. B&B 7 QB QUERCUS bicolor Swamp White Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 1 OR QUERCUS rubra Red Oak 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B TREE FORM 16 SA SALIX albs Tristis' Golden Weeping Willow 1 3/4" Cal. B&B 17 1 TC ITSUGA canadensis ICanadian Hawthorne 3-4' Ht. I B&B I Field Loc. Shrubs Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 42 CO CEPHALANTHUS occidentalis Buttonbush W. #3 Cont. 10 CA CLETHRA alnifolia Surmrersweet 30" #5 Cont. 62 CR CORNUS racemosa Grey Dogwood 34 Ht. B&B 29 IV ILEX verticillata Winterberry T B&B 22 JV JUNIPERUS virginiana'Grey Owl' Grey Owl Juniper 24" B&B 20 PM PINUS mugo Mugho Pine 30"-36" B&B 16 SNS SPIREA nipponica'Snowmound' Snowmound Spirea 30" Ht. B&B 12 SIC STEPHANANDRA incisa'Crispa' Cutleaf Stephanandra 15" #5 Cont. 134 TO THUJA occidentalis Arborvitae 6 - 8' Ht. B&B COLLECTED. 20 TON THUJA occidentalis'Nigra' Dark Green Arborvitae 5 - 6 Ht, B&B 14 VD VIBURNUM dentatum Arrowwood Viburnum 3 - 4' HL B&B or Cont. 8 VT VIBURNUM trilobum American Cranberrybush 3 - 4' Ht. B&B or Cont. Unit Price Installed $170.00 $2,210.00 $ 5,525.00 $128.00 $1,792.00 $ 4,480.00 $125.00 $625.00 $ 1,562.50 $135.00 $2,160.00 $ 5,400.00 $135.00 $1,215.00 $ 3,037.50 $160.00 $960.00 $ 2,400.00 $165.00 $1,155.00 $ 2,887.50 $175.00 $1,400.00 $ 3,500.00 $145.00 $2,175.00 $ 5,437.50 $147.00 $1,764.00 $ 4,410.00 Unff Price $170.00 $2,210.00 $ 5,525.00 $130.00 $650.00 $ 1,625.00 $120.00 $1,200.00. $ 3,000.00 $125.00 $375.00 $ 937.50 $115.00 $115.00 $ 287.50 $160.00 $640.00 $ 1,600.00 $40.00 $2,280.00 $ 5,700.00 $135.00 $2,700.00 $ 6,750.00 $40.00 $3,160.00 $ 7,900.00 $135.00 $810.00 $ 2,025.00 $175.00 $1,225.00 $ 3,062.50 $145.00 $145.00 $ 362.50 $95.00 $1,520.00 $ 3,800.00 $65.00 $1,105.00 $ 2,762.50_ Unit Price $17.00 $714.00 $ 1,785.00 $20.00 $200.00 $ 500.00 $17.00 $1,054.00 $ 2,635.00 $23.00 $667.00 $ 1,667.50 $20.00 $440.00 $ 1,100.00 $40.00 $800.00 $ 2,000.00 $18.00 $288.00 $ 720.00 $15.00 $180.00 $ 450.00 $26.00 $3,484.00 $ 8,710.00 $48.00 $960.00 $ 2,400.00 $20.00 $280.00 $ 700.00 $30.00 $240.00 $ 600.00 Scientific Name Common Name Sae Spec Notes Unit Price $6.00 $0.00 $ - $ 107,245.00 o G t Spear Meadows 1/03/06 TJ Boyle Assoc. Landscape Architect 1. All cultivars of Ash are unacceptable species in South Burlington due to over Planting. A substitute species should be used. 2. I would recommend species other than Viburnum dentatum and Viburnum trilobum. Both of these are very susceptible to damage from Viburnum leaf beetle, which is becoming a problem in South Burlington. The following species are much less susceptible to attack: • V. carlesii, Koreanspice Viburnum • V. plicatum, Doublefile Viburnum • V. plicatum var. tomentosum, Doublefile Viburnum • V. rhytidophylum, Leatherleaf Viburnum • V. sieboldii, Siebold Viburnum 3. Tsuga canadensis is listed in the planting schedule, as Canadian Hawthorn but it should be Canadian hemlock. Hemlock is not well adapted to the poorly drained clay soils on this site and a substitute species is highly advised. 4. Golden Weeping Willow is a great choice for wetland buffers, however, there re several locations where this species is located in close proximity to sewer lines and storm sewer lines. Due to the invasiveness of willow root systems, this species should not be located within 50 feet of sewer or storm sewer lines. 5. The Freeman Maples located on the back of lots 16 and 17 are almost directly on top of the sewer line. These trees should be relocated a minimum of 10 feet from the sewer line. 6. There are several locations where trees are located directly over or within a couple of feet of where water services tap into the water main. Tree spacing should be altered to leave at least 5-10 feet of clearance around these intersections. FK>A LOT 9 , I_ — —I 1 L — J I1 1— �/'.'la,#dAlot Partr,vAh� - - - - y - - 1741-ODW MOALAT7 II .:.:i:. ........... 1.: W. and Alm Ifi I/ Q end J. Farrel I In r-rra � � s,o-o, �� I Fm LCT2 open sp� I ,e4o-amx � L tl Air I i c/o L. HaokaO �1 1 1 I T. end Y 11 I ,aao-o,aoe < _ J VAdbon LlDeldc I! I R and I E Lem I 8p\�\q\�� I I I I I I ,sa a4oe IT I C J ,a4o-o,as, I T. Chwr4rwm "T t I I 11 I\I I `� 7 I I ,00mw I sPol .a9 1 I APHIC SCALE 71=100' APPLICANT: ERIC FARRELL FARRELL REAL ESTATE P.O. BOX 1335 BURLINGTON, VT 05402 OWNERS: GARY N. and JANE G. FARRELL, et al. 1350 SPEAR STREET S. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 12/5/2005 FINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL i SITE ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, lNC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 802-935-2323 FAX: 802-985-2271 WEB: srww.cea-vt.com WETLANDS CONSULTANT: GILMAN and BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL 1 CONTI CIRCLE, SUITE 5 BARRE, VT 056411 SITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: T.J. BOYLE ASSOCIATES 301 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 TRAFFIC CONSULTANT: FUSS and O'NEILL 78 INTERSTATE DRIVE (PEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 o8C city ofso. guy. I/7Won INDEX OF SHEETS: SITE: C1.0 MASTER SITE PLAN CI.OA EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN CI.1-C1.4 ROAD PLAN and PROFILE C1.5 SEWER LINE CONNECTION AT SPEAR STREET C1.8 WATER EXTENSION PLAN and PROFILE CL.7 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA SITE PLANS C1.6 TURN LANE and CUL-DE-SAC IMPROVEMENTS C2.0 SEWER and SITE DETAILS C2.1 WATER and STORM DETAILS C2.2 ROAD and SITE DETAIIS C2.3 SITE DETAILS C2.4 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C3.0 SPECIFICATIONS CB.I SPECIFICATIONS C3.2 SPECIFICATIONS C3.3 SPECIFICATIONS SURVEY: S1.0 PLAT of SURVEY - T—da of FARRELL & COLE S1.1 FINAL PLAT of SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPING: LI OVERALL LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN L2 LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN L3 LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN L4 LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN L5 LANDSCAPE and LIGHTING PLAN L8 PLANTING NOTES and DETAILS L7 SITE DETAILS SITE -G—IIR: ' � i I �\ \MEAD0WC>0D8 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE .6. INC_ _ ' DRIVE PO. 0CV486 SHELBURNE, VF 05492 M-OMM28 FA ' SW-9B 227F mm OF 1, rim SAV SAV Ci 1.V I I 10'WIDE 7777 GIA PROJECT: RECREATION PATH J C1.21 7' VAD SPEAR GREEN PACE MEADOWS T. and L KJoh L iod'Am aw. R go, ;g SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT WE- F-- 28' PAVEMENT < L74_ TH I I K4" HI40- um uld swo J� _4 ------------- & -- -------------- SOUTEAST QUADRANT! DISTRICT DI OVERLAY � 0 RESTRICTED AREA ZONING BOUNDARY 26* PAVEMENT -------- WIDTH K4�;KN D -------- C1.3 LOT 19 01SOH.CONTOUR - ;RZ— W IT ZONING DISTRICT HEIGHT RESTRICTION = 35 FEET — —SS — WA\M SEWIR UW — —FM— FORM MAN W. Wd it (Mbwt cpan BP_ — —W— WATER UNE 1640-M400 PM .a. el S — —OE— OVERHEAD ELECTRIC a Kdow 4, DUN ELECTRIC "1 — RESTRICTED AREA — UT— UNOI�RGROUND TELEPHONE G AR 0— GAS LINE —SIT— STORM DRAINAGE LWE Q a FarrB4 PAV wolH OC.O. ORAMTY SEWER O.EAMOUT SEVER MANHOLE G 0 STORM MANHOLE HYDRANT SHUT- IN CATCH BASIN PWA _j POWER POLE cwuVE EDGE OF WOWS L j 1e,o-m f I_ y,� v I cotrwN% OL c/o L Hackeft 3w M. Dencker L w T. 0--m f cl. 4 SAV n.AL PLAN lU011TTlAl I I J ' �.�, LI MASTER u SITE PLAN \ \ I I I I ' aI / — — I — /cl.5-T7 o/ NOV., 2004 11 = 100, clo —1. No. 02250 Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt enet/)ZOOZaunr'0088wjodSd ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece ■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Maile or Priority Mail®. ■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. ■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail For , valuables, plea seder Insured or Registered Mail. ■ For an addle o a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return eceipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 38111 the article and add applicable postage to coveNhe fee. Endorse mailpiece "I urn Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receiptj.�a USPSO postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addreswae or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery" ■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry, Internet access to delivery information Is not available on mail addressed to APOs and FPOs. = %.fL-I I 1 11 IL-je 141r.&IL-TrA (Domestic Mail Only; I IL-%.FL-ll No Insurance Coverage I Provided) LrI CO I For delivery information O'FFICIAL visit our website at www.usps.com,, U—SE I cr- Ln M Postage Certified Fee 1,19, Postmark ED Return Reclept Fee 2; Ej (Endorsement Required) ED Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) rl M Total Postage & Fees $ ED ...... FoF .sfe-a.Z. . ................ 17� or PO Box ---------- am Ip+4k _ffl( 3U0, June LUC UNITED STATE` 3TAL SERVICE First -Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid USPS Permit No. G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINC-7^ ! VERMONT 05403 S_fj �•'3, �ii?ittlfili�?!�11!i?I4II!!��!l'.?IflfililllSii�4�F4�'.�ti?If431 ■ Complete items 1, 2, an3S. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. Article Addressed to: ta:rr�1 � K t�C> ��j 133� A. Signature X U a B. iv y (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery tC6 U D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Se ce Type Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service /abed 7003 3110 0001 3598 5664 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 South Burlington ; Planning &.,Zoning To: Planning Commission From: Betsy McDonough, E 9-1-1 Coordinator Date: December 15, 2005 Re: Street Names for Spear Meadows and South Village, SPEAR MEADOWS At last week's PC meeting you approved Terra Verde Lane as the new road name in the Spear Meadows Development. The Developer has since changed their mind on that na propose the following: C1. Willow Tree Lane (preferred) 2. Hayfields n Both names are acceptable. SOUTH VILLAGE r Retrovest is proposing the following names for the South Village Development. They are as follows: 1. East Allen Road — This is not acceptable as we have an Ethan Allen Road which sounds very similar. Allen Road East would be acceptable. Any other ideas would be appreciated. � 7(0 c(-d C—GLSt 2. North Jefferson Road — OK 3. South Jefferson Road — OK 4. Aiken Street — OK 5. Slade Street — OK 6. Chipman Street — OK 7. Fisher Street — OK el 8. Frost Street — OK 11� tr - 1 - OWNER OF RECORD Parcel A -1302 Spear Street - Gary N. Farrell Doubletree Hotel 1117 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 802-660-7526 Parcel B -1340 Spear Street - Parcel C -1350 Spear Street - Brent Farrell 18 Irish Road Cambridge, VT 05444 802-849-9767 Brenda F. Cole 100 Chelsea Place Williston, VT 05495 802-879-3284 Karen Maklad 111 Goodridge Drive Williston, VT 05495 802-878-4460 Kevin Farrell 152 Cedar Avenue Arlington, MA 02476 781-641-4516 Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-5822 LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED Parcel A - Vol. 677 Pages 402 Parcel B - Vol. 274 Pages 440-443 Vol. 274 Pages 280-282 Parcel C - Vol.142 Pages 45-47 CONTACT PERSON Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402-1334 Eric Farrell efarrell@farrellrealestatevt.com 658-7400 x25 860-3594 (fax) TAX PARCEL ID# Parcel A -1640 - 01302 R Parcel B -1640 -1340 Parcel C -1640 - 01350 R Liz Miller emiller@farrellrealestatevt.com 658-7400 x14 860-3594 (fax) I FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters November 7, 2005 Parcel Number Name & Address 1742-00033 R Larkin / Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00089 R Robert A. & Marjorie N. Skiff 89 Springhouse Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. & Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 0570-01225 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. & Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01302 R Gary N. Farrell (1302 Spear Street) Clarion Hotel 1117 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle Q Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. & Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R Diane Muir 1408 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01331 R Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01393 R William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01404 R Todd & Maureen Wulfson 1404 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Brett & Jennifer Grabowski 23 Dorey Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 that 4same nent Perk comments ad on the nt MSGP close of February 1:30 PM). for com- extended ion ..of the the Agen- ural Re - Interested y submit views on of Natural roposal to 3GP. Com- be sub- ing to the h, Main IT 05671- IiPietro cached Mi- document sing email gmas.dipi- comments uring the nent peri- etained by y of the latural Re- d consid- final deter- th respect armit. ng: A public the draft aP will be ednesday, 2006 from it the Pavil- :m located Street in Vermont. e of the Is to al - Id persons. heir views :y of Natu- s' propos- the MSGP. iearing will. follow- a Irmational eduled for ite.. Public II . be ac- me. tearing .will d pursuant 3.31 of the iter Pollu- ol Permit Any per - A 'Source Protection Area has been delineated which is the .recharge area to the above well. The well site and Source Drotection Area is locat- ad within Bolton. A map showing the well location and size of the Source ?rotection Area may be found in the Town Office of Bolton. The rational ,egatding the delineation s on file with the Water Supply- Division and is available for review, The permitting Agency for the well site and the Source Protection Area is the Water Supply Divi- sion. This Division will ,onsider all written coin- ments, including . a re- quest for a public hear- ng, received at the ad Press below by January 18; 2006. Dated at Wa- terbury, Vermont this De - )ember 28, 2005. kddress all written com- ments to: - Dennis Nealon, Hydro - geologist Department of. Environ- nentalConservaUon Nater Supply Division Did Pantry Building 103 South Main Street Naterbury,.. _ T 05671- )403 302-241-3411 December 3`11 2005 PUBLIC HEA- RING SOUTH BURIdNG• -TON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review hoard will hold a public hearing at the South 3.urlington City Hall ^onference Room, 575 Dorset ,Street, South 3urlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January' 17, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to :onsiderthe following: 1. Preliminary plat ap- )lication #SD-05-94 of The Rock of Greater 3urfington for a ilanned unit develop- ment consisting of . a 13,500 .sq. ft:. house of Norship to be built ' in wo (2) phases, phase being 7500 sq. ft. and )hase, II being 6100 sq. ft., 73 Thompson Preliminary plat ap- ALBANS TOWN CATIONAL CENTER 2006-2007 ►K-8 Principal ,r a more. information finphis position, please visit our website .at ww:sovecnet!-fcsu9csuinfo.htm EOE .xecutive :RFORMERS! atrivino Mr exrellenne- have a (802) 65�$-3321 I ITCHEN STAFF FULL IIMLtUKALL!'U- burlingtonfreepress.com .f WAAIT STAFF' . SITIONS . Dayti LABORES/PAINTERS I OUTBACK a mustllabillty Labors/painters needed STEAKHOUSE Apply in person at: for temporary night work. ISO Dorset Street The Olive Garden No experience required • South Burlington, VT 1025 Shelburne Road (800) 616-7626 (802) 862-0003 So. Burlington pplication #SD-05-95 of Pizzagalli, Properties,; LLC for a planned unit development consis- ting of a 54,372 sq..ft.. general office building, 192 Tilley Dr. 3. Final plat application #SD-05-97 of The Snyder- Custom Homes, LLC to ;amend a previously approved plat for a four (4) lot subdivision. The amendment consists of relocating the access drive to lot 43, 680 Nowland Farm Rd. 4. final plat application #SD-05,96 of Spear Meadows, LLC for a _planned unit develop- ment to. subdivide a -26.19 acre parcel. de- veloped :with two (2) single family dwellings into: 1) 17 single family lots, and. 2) a 3.305 acre parcel to be de- veloped with six(6) two (2) family dwell- ings, 1302-1-850 .Spear St. Copies of .the applica- tions are available for publip inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John D i n k I a g a Chairman South Burling - ton Development Re- view Board December 31, 2005 Lost & Fa;fnd FOUND adult men's ski suit, 12/24, near Essex Cinema, In road.(802) 899-4103. FOUND CAT, black w/ collar, Winchester Place' 12/27. Call to identify (802)878-3516: r0u11d FOUND CAT, black - /white, short haired 1 yr old male. Raceway in Jericho (802) 899.4013 mile" We beng buyers and sellers together. (802) 658-3321 burl i ngtonfreepress.co m FOUND DOG, female tan w/ white markings. So Burlington on 12n8. Call (802) 985-2248. FOUND DOG, small whit@ Bichon Frise7 Rice High on 12/22. Call (802) 846-4141.E FOUND DOG young,' Med size. Black Lab mix. In Burlington 12/29. -Call (802) 985.2248., FOUND EARRING, Gold 1/2 hoop post with gems.. King St. 12/29. (802) 658-9363 . FOUND RING On comer of Pead and Elmwood St. Cal( to Identify (802) 343-1468 RN's & LPN's & . LNA' S . Various hours available Come check out our new management team! Green Mountain Nursing Home The bed & breakfast of Rehabilitation & Long Term Care To apply contact: , Sunny Molyneux, DON 'r " an Allen Ave, Colchester VT 05446 !1i 1 02.655.1025 *Fax.- 802 655-)962 tit: gmnhU5446Ca1man.corn M. VERMONT. ENERGY INVESTMENT CORPORATION Come join Vermont's innovative energy efficiency organizationl We're a non-profit organization dedicated -to saving energy and improving our environment. We're looking for energetic, enthusiastic and environmentally motivated individuals to join our terrific. team. These positions require excellent customer -service, written and oral communication, word"processing, spread sheet and database skills. EOE : PROJECT ASSISTANT Applicatl 13� deadline of 1/3/06 Proytde erlr6 Iriistrative and logistical sup ,. �. port to. our • , s per Services project man- Fax802- 6 hours/weeK. Must memoersnlp ant NFI - Nc n have sox pp e r 1 e n c e competitive pay. Family with school age chil- Contact Addis Bahr, Bringing Vennont dren. Y: membership Group Fitness Coordi- Children, Families, & and training opportu- n a t o r, at a b a h r CommunitiesTogether nities. Call Julie at @gbymca.org or(802) I EDE (802) 862-9622. EOE 862-9622.. EDE Junction Via outesMai able The Burlington Free Press has routes available in the following areas. Brickyard Maple St Fake $500 a 'month plus tip! + Must have an insured reliable vehicle 4, Early morning hours, 7 days a Week Provide top notch cus- tomer service 21 r: a call Now' 02-6 u.. . > °K Be Your Own Boss With 'a ';Burlington Free Press . delivery route you get ... ♦ that extra needed cash needed for the Holidays! ♦ to 'pay down those high credit card payments . paid to _ exercise ♦ Stress Relief �+ Coincides with your full time responsibilities 11111IfaIra 45nn . $innn a mnnthl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 12, 2oo6 Eric Farrell Farrell Real Estate PO Box 1335 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Spear Meadows Dear Eric: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 17, 2oo6 at 7:30 p.m.. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy Mc ough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. (P"FJ' k kW?a i ;.' 4 �t+v" l b1 �@Y. �k f AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPEAR MEADOWS, LLC AND ST. CLAIR GROUP, INC. REGARDING AMENDMENT TO FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-05-96 OF SPEAR MEADOWS LLC TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON This Agreement, in consideration of the mutual promises herein made is hereby made by and between Spear Meadows, LLC (hereinafter "Developer" and St. Clair Group, Inc., (hereinafter "Adjoining Property Owner"), the owner of property at 1317 Spear Street immediately opposite the proposed Spear Meadows entrance road to Spear Street, hereby agree that Developer shall amend Final Plat Application #SD-05-96 of Spear Meadows LLC to the City of South Burlington in order to incorporate the following conditions. In order for Developer to ameliorate night-time headlight glare effects on Adjoining Property Owner's building and land located directly opposite from the primary entrance road of Spear Meadows and also to ameliorate any disruptive effects on Adjoining Property Owner from complying with the Development Review Board requirement that close -by parts of Spear Street be widened to three lanes to incorporate a south bound left turn lane into the main entrance off Spear Street for the Spear Meadows development, Developer agrees as follows: 1. Developer, at its sole expense, shall design, plan for, purchase and professionally install screening plantings on Adjoining Property Owner's land to the reasonable satisfaction of Adjoining Property Owner. Unless otherwise agreed in writing between Developer and Adjoining Property Owner, the number of plantings shall consist of at least 43 overall plants, to be a mix of no less than 34 Thuja occidentalLi ji r ,Dark Green Arborvitae) plus 7 Aronia arbutifola "Brill iantissima" plus 2 Malus " " in order to provide year round screening in a staggered placement in general accordance with (subject only to last minute adjustments at time of planting which are mutually agreeable between Developer and Adjoining Property Owner) an amendment dated January 17, 2006 to the City of South Burlington Final Plat application #SD-05-96 to be prepared by Developer which covers the substance of this Agreement and which incorporates a landscape sketch plan by T.J. Boyle and Associates, dated January 17, 2006. As part of the amendment and sketch Developer also shall install a raised soil bed/berm to an elevation of 2 feet above existing grade. The bed/berm shall be graded out to portray a natural setting which flows water from the high point of the berm easterly out to the street sideline. Installation shall be completed as soon as practically possible after commencement of construction of the entrance road at Spear Street but no later than September 15th of the initial construction year unless otherwise mutually agreed between the parties. Each planting shall be at least 6' in height at time of installation, measured from top of ball to top of planting and its survival shall be warranted by Developer for a minimum of two years. In the event that the agreed screenings are not installed by September 15th of the initial construction year the Adjoining Property Owner shall have the option of causing such screening plantings in accordance with this Agreement and the above -referenced sketch plan at the sole expense of Developer. 2. Developer further claims that the widening of the road shall primarily occur on the easterly side of Spear Street near the Spear Meadows entrance and therefore shall not disrupt the property Page Number 1 of 2 Pages owned by Adjoining Property Owner. Nevertheless, in the event the required widening of Spear Street requires the relocation of any of the following belonging to or relating to the Adjoining Property Owner and located at Spear Street (i.e. the wooden white picket fence, any part of the existing lawn, the utility pole and light, the existing mailbox, any part of the paved driveway -- including the raised part at the northernmost driveway entrance to Spear Street -- or the utility connection box located immediately north of the northeast corner of the white picket fence along Spear Street, Developer, at its sole expense, agrees to relocate (and repair as necessary any damage relating to the relocation and reinstallation of any item) and reinstall all of the above that are required to be relocated. Any and all relocation and re -landscaping shall be performed in a professional manner and, after relocation and re -installation, shall perform as intended. All of the above described work shall be completed in a timely manner so as to minimize the disruption between any item being uninstalled and when that item is reinstalled. 3. Adjoining Property Owner hereby grants Developer limited permission to enter upon Adjoining Property Owner's land for the purposes of implementing the subject matter of this Agreement and Developer agrees to repair the property as necessary in relation to any damage to property of Adjoining Property Owner in connection with the implementation of this Agreement. Dated at South Burlington, VT this 17th day of 1,a.uum:34,2006. Spea�Neadows L C St. Clair Gr up, Inc By: Eric Farrell, Authorized A ent Ric and M. "Rick" H bard, Authorized Agent Page Number 2 of 2 Pages TON(34) i MDW-�L--� AA(2) LIMITS OF ZBERM MDW Spear Meadows - Spear Street, South Burlington - Planting Schedule 1/17/2005 Qty. Code Scientific Name Common Name Size Spec Notes 2 MA MALUS'Adams' Adams Crabapple 2 - 2.5" Cal. B&B 7 AA Aronia arbutifolia 'Brilliantissima Red Chokeberry 6 - 8' Ht. B&B 34 TON THUJAoccidentalis 'Nigra' Dark Green Arborvitae 6' Ht. B&B CEDAR (3) Gary Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 landscape architects • planning consultants 301 college street • burlington • vermont • 05401 802.658.3555 mjb sneer no: drawn by date 01 Spear Meadows - www.tjboyle.com north 4scale 1 " = 1 O'-o" Landscape Screening Sketch L-SK1 R 1nd�� IL am1lftdkw I T.maLare L M= Eddb ■ � 1k •na IL awn \ ,.a..■IaOa % I � � 1 obLWdQ L� � J` '% LJI I �• i I 0/0 L �� '\ 1 � �� ���%ice I ua ms■ `\\ \ / / I Tykt ' I I 4 ■d IL Lgbw 1 I I Mp.Wp I a l waON d I I I I wo a s ao I I a IT.M. M e 11 I I j IbtAffitC SCALE 11-100, ' I I SPEAR MEADOWS APPLICANT: ERIC FARRELL FARRELL REAL ESTATE P.O. BOX 1335 BURLINGTON, VT 05402 OWNERS: GARY N. and JANE G. FARRELL, et al. 1350-SPEAR STREET IS. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 SITE ENGINEER.: CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 802-985-2323 FAX: 802-985-2271 WEB: -cee-vt.com WETLANDS CONSULTANT: WILLIAM D. COUNTRYMAN R.D.1 868 WINCH HILL NORTHFIELD, VT 05663 SITE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: T.J. BOYLE ASSOCIATES 301 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VT 05401 TRAFFIC CONSULTANT: FUSS and O'NEILL 78 INTERSTATE DRIVE WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 PREL�3/29/05 TAL DATE NOTM pl1RP0SE DEpICf 7F�E I. ME'BNp. KEVI L AND BRF?I� FFJ0a /Ilp BR16L ELOF 2 s�aA,I�geNOBMp�04 yA m TAbF A TE)TAL PLAN t n t. T 0!i BEPT �, iMd � 4, THE DEED CL•SF 7HE NS D�T}E LOCATIOIIS C THE �A ,L MI*S T AAIlp 7F€ �V9CTo We�rfFE►N PtiYSKAAL 710N E�DEEDS AND BE E7 JTm i0 ELYANA•IE J �Fy nogTrOORR COLOR OF D BE Olt TI1lE Sao Y. tt�N�THE RO��ArP BU H AYs NO ROADS 1e02-1BBB. AGE TO*j OF TO'NM gM�I►►M�ES VDLIA/E t�.pPAAGGEg222L 0. uUeALAND�PWIs � � T OF AT "C 1 PU 7TGHHITHISSOFVY FRR R ,QRI ECORDED 7, 7E LF TH14 SEIRVEYAjd. E rrH RESPECT TO CE 0. *TH LOCAL Olt STATE TS. THIS PROPERTY LIES ON 7HE 'SOUTHEAST QUT ADRW AND 'SPEAR STREET — DORSET PARK SCE40 N10 PROTEnON OVERLAY' ZONING DISTRICTS: 9 A e0' �DE 'EAS6*Xr BE VALE DR1yE AND 7HE S1B,ECE PROPERTY IS DEPICTED ON REFE1tE}NCE PLAN 4. AND RINSED AS HEREON) ON REFETE " PLAN 3. 7HE EARLIER *AS REFERIENCED AN AN 'PREVOP.ABLE wm OF D�EDICAR 4 O PT 1AGE �ATEO NDk %, 19m AND RECORDED r / SITE ENGINEER: C 'SWIFT ESTATES' SUBDIVISION p cc/ii CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOaATES INC. P.B. Grabowski I I T. and L. Kleh C. Shand et al �/ P.O. e0X485 SHELBURNE VT 054a2 8 J. L Milot of & M. $age 523 I Volume 175, Pepe 163 I Volume 405, Page 726 ao2De5337a FAX e0e-0as " xee: �,wn•.ce,.ecan volume 643, Page 297 I Volume 115, Pepe 523 I ti. — —Se Note 9brYll Easement — — I-• C — — - -t1 Y See Note t L75• Ac DeArN �i. — x —,L PJM I JLM °t< x Y 7 J/4• Y7 — — 2ePr 0.Y•ACr 1.0' AG _ /! Opr1 Specs cYECfm 6 A 2.5'AG � ' F�\ `Plmacb®spear JLM �`. 1 Wig/ � SAV 1 Karen, Kevin, and Brent Farrell yy�� and Brenda Cole / PROJECT: �. Larkln/Milot Partnership Volume 274 Pages 440-443 ' Volume 286, Pape 538 SPEAR Volume 274 Pages 280-282 !' (n)M and State Agricultural College $ r' MEADOWS ±22.3 acres Volume 134, Pepe 384 � � •.. \ I UNDEVELOPED LANDS % ::1 _ 1340 SPEAR STREET SPEAR STREET �NqO`�� A/C7�cN\ \ 1 —_ --� -..-,� r..��y..� T �� __:____ ���'-ree—cre�.�a''�'�+�.•.•."-"—.•'-'—'_''..T._•.:✓":''.`.'--.•.'.••.:,•.:.-:./-•:.:•'?-:,• � SOUTH BURLINGTON ......::..... ::::VERMONT n) lceys 7MV I \ N13a7 I Open Space ��aa J/4 • OF (A. 0 24AW I \ •P6naole ® Speer a!' AG ' Q W. and M. Gilbert VoBane 209, Pope 225 i ` !/4• IPr r raun I J. Kelley I /4- 1Pr 1 \ Volume 214 �� 70 Pap. 259 (IBT3C2 '4.,y, SINF7 \ 1302 Speer SC I ` iDD�14' I City Of, \er J0.7, a G.M. uly Ferrell ` I G. and J. Farrell 677 Pa 402 I Volume 14Z Page 45 xO.D�c1ee ±29 eaea 3/4•mr . aaYIFIFP mil) !/4• .x 1600 Spear 50eet fA,M C� I IQO AGE I.0' AG ` ` I • rI Nr.• ♦ / D. 8 L I Ni• Y I � \ I Hackea I I I Be6ey Ee5ae I oung Volume 41Z Milan Pegg 99 a5' AG ♦ Ule, fame PLAN PER70CES ' I. ' OF BOUNDARY A WRVEY — PROPERTY OF THE I SWE OF 'B(pCL.,�LASTMAREVr RE ,E»(E 30, BY ta�BY 60WE�No ASSOCIATES, 2 PREPAREDOF BAY .L4. =DATED JULY 1 3 'MAL PLAT FOR SUBIDWON OF PROPERTY OF GERALD AND JDHN LAW — P1�ACLE O SPEAR (fDR�IERLY 7*10 , PREPARED BY BUTTON AS80CIA7E8, DATED 8/21/190L 4. 'PLAT SHO*Q SURVEY AND SU�F A P� SPEAR PnO PREPBYL a ASSOCIAES, DATED 'A' BRABUTTON 0. ESTATEr PREPARED BY *LUS EiNOEO NG, DATED G / ". OF 4 PREPARED BYLALAMOII� k ODICI*SON C*SLL7140 E?NOINEERS, LNG, DATED 4/21/2007• AG aX) 0.J' AG CIF 0.5• AG � \ ii �� a ` I 4,e I pmma0eal \ S%.T I 3/4• ADF (CqW d) Fa e ' I I I I 4 U seeeee�e��SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CMF~ O IPFAV 0 A CALCULATED POINT ZONING BOUNDARY CONCRETE/MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND IRON PIPE/REBAR FOUND (w/SIZE) 'T BAR' FOUND AG ABOVE GROUND 9 5/8• REBAR w/ SURVEY MARKER. PROPOSED FENCE UNE DRAINAGE SWALE WETLANDS (DELINEATED BY OTHERS) IT. 8 MW.fis. I I plume � I D. 8 C. Frenzonl i Pepe 349 Volume 211, IBar Fww !/4�IFY I / Pope447 I 1 5AF 0. AG \ Flaw I an D. Muhr M. Dencker I Volume 219, Volume ,37, Pepe 287 I Page 323 `I I I a 7' AG nF (DIEftreed) I'm 1—led cur nueh /�Q UDC Iro • ,err fN oQS�p'� AFPF 10 Ac ROAD v Q� GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEEr ) I imn = 100 fL To the bwt of my kno*ledp k bdief thL plat propriy daplab EM nwtlta of a wrNy arlduotd Indr my aprNirl a• wifted ti Bta notes abovi bawd an our and*ag of noorde s phydad WAdrlw found. aanfarmanw Tfllllnoord 71 plat Y In wlbdrltld oo cxE *M 27 VSA 1403, liralhy R. 0D#= Yr. LA 597 LOCATION MAP ,• _ 3ooe a4Pi61Da p.tawl VA IurWla AwnmR W Nato 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT of EXISTING CONDITIONS DATE OMIa,C NVYeia MARCH, 2004 11- 1"=100' S1 .0 Paw.... 02250 ., LO a C(13 G , CL N LO C7 00 N M O r 'SWIFT ESTATES" SUBDIVISION P.B. Grabowski I I T. and L. Kleh I C. Shand at al M. & M. Scolllns & J. L. Mllot I Volk— 17% Pag. 183 Volun. 405, Peg. 728 Vohons 843, Pepe 297 I Volume 115, Pegs 523 to Ilmi a � -Fe. � ,,ems s �ass atsa --—- .� 7 — UVM and State Agricultural College VoBen. 134, Peg. 364 N Np r l .� 7oroN\ r J. Kelley ape Volume 283, ro Page 25D � �•W' SNiF T LOT t I � I ( Hackett I I I Bea., E. I H r.:.:.. LAELILJ lloA Illf t �! 1� / LOT it us�e'u•w '/ 100.27 0.15 ACHES To BE DEEDED TO FRANZONI Nar32'23•E 00' 200.44' SI 20Q44' 0.08 ACRES TO BE--' I I / I I DEEDED TO WULFSON : 5a 35.00'' I I J5.00' D. & L I ( ; Young 2, T. & M. Vol—1� I dum..559 ID . & C. Franzonl l` `A Page 349 V.1 .�1, 4 I oe jb / G. Sporryns I d t'I D. Muhr r l I ) Volume 218, ' M. Dmnc \\ I EASEWENTAREA TO t 1 Page 287 1 Paae 323 SITE ENGINEER: / �i C pCIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. P.O. BOX 485 SNELBURNE, yr 054a2 � eca-Pes24ts rA�c ms•.aszzn .ee:.,....ceavaom mUm 20 Recreational Easement See Note g � —N— — r --x— o-- — — --n — — — — -- PJMIJLM \� pa -a jOpexsaam LM l� a E' Spoor SAV r PROJECT: BEDEEDED TO I KER117150 T O \ BRENTFARRELLB I `I BRENDACOLE / / Q U wwww� e>_ SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE �e — — — EXISTING PROPERTY LINE V�QQ — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE • CALCULATED POINT — — ZONING BOUNDARY CWA,wO CONCRETE/MARBLE MONUMENT FOUND RAVO IRON PIPE/REBAR FOUND (w/SIZE) A •T BAR" FOUND AG ABOVE GROUND C 5/8• REBAR w/ SURVEY MARKER, PROPOSED * R FENCE LINE —� DRAINAGE SWALE WETLANDS (DELINEATED BY OTHERS) GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN PEET ) 1 inch a 100 IL Larkin/Mllot Partnership Volume 2K P.g. s3a I op- Space E C •P/nnec4 ® Spew E I V, MAP, 3 jg "w of SD R111,41* _ I \ TO ALLfN ROAD To the best of my kn,jAedpe & betef this plat property depicts the rewults of a s rM oonducted under my supervision as cuffed In Vw notes aboN, bared an our andynk of noords R phydod evldwm foal. FJdrtYuq bo rfdvlew duoNn am In substantial oanlbrinanw jltth the rsoard This plat Is It wuadetautid oontannalw Wrd, T/ VSA i4m Tknotsy A Cv*- Yr. LS 597 SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LOCATION MAP 1' = 3000 IawwON PRELIMINARY PLAT of SUBDIVISION aMARCH, 2005 oaanxa "on ecru 1.= 100, S 1.1 PROM. NO. 02250 C2 Ft and AIL SM U and kt Scogm 1180-00214 T. and L Klah 1160-00219 L W-am Ed@ 0s70-01225 1845-00089 _ -----x--■- N-- ------------- ------------- _ 40 o -----_-- __ - _ _ --------- __-__ - ___- \_39p__---------------------------_ 39_ 5 - �_/--�J- __ � Pkuads pt \ '-395 39 395 - - - � ---_ - - -_ ________________________ 393-_'__ 394 _______________"_ 3g3 ___ ___________ _ ______ 392 93 _ ---- ------ - -"--------------- ------ \_ - 9ry 91, �� Keyi� and Brent Ferrel ------- I- � Partm*ip K � 1 / 1742-00033 U b , �S� 1840 -13i0 _ _392 8�. \ - 390 ------------------ •tea �-------- / =.-:zz .-- -------- _ _ 38' _-------------- - ' SPRUCES YVVCU_ and M Glml 1640-01400 / I I - - / Q and %L FwTal 0.� I 1840-0135 \ V 1640-01302 o 1 . '. L_ . .......... .... o.1440lYAIr opm PMnade at Spear �391-_____--- j .. 393_-_ • REVa \i L and D. Yb�1p �rY1mok Bop? L Hackett .�� �� /' Z I I T. endµ i • 1640-014M I 1640-01350 ��\� o/ 1 I \ I Da�K�Caf I uftm -390 \ y, \ I I I I 1840--01430 \ Z\ :\ �` \ I I 1640-01404 I ya SWH 389- � ..����,g�-� IIJL end �il, r'TC[�QE1 1640-01405 ,------ / I anE L.avlpna Sp Kd I 1640-01331 1 1 B. eEld T. CYif11ol1attf �� v-�\ I 1840-01393 1 wM�4st� ��� I I / ---_- I I � 1 1 i 1 tIV-379,�3 \ \ = SITE ENGINEER: c CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O.80%485 SHELBURNE, 1? oUV 8 -90=3 FAX 8024&'.T Rey& wxw.ce•Kcwn ORASN PJM cmO SAV APPROV6o pm PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON VERMONT LEGEND ,,, ..........- � — —ee MAW m L69 — — *►m uw — —oe olvill o ■canes — —UK wpOl■Oft ■Idle¢ — —eT aleey el1ANAoc UK o" ceAMtt e^IPl aWlaar m • -0 E ® O Smell OWE ■ ■ oAml RUN ro*m ME ti mI Or *0= RRl•IRION EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN OATS DRAnnc —On NOV., 2004 SCAU I -ov C1.0A PRO/. NO. 02250 �o a) f1 a N O c� O 0 00 N M O 3 ccu C CL O Lo cV N O 3 O Lo N N O N O O U o. Q o� U O = I•ae-aar�w 1 I I MEADOWOOD8 DRIVE I I \ I // J) roFurt�t srAbV I I I I T.mdLIM I CC'�'3 flao-ama I I I I GRAPHIC SCALE I IN FEW ) I ..h - laa n r \ SITE ENGINEER: C \ CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. P.O..485 SHELBURNE, 1T 054U XO 99523P5 FAX: 0102-986 11 Nam. ww.ce.rccom ..... nua-amar ,,---- II RECEIVI, g C'fy Of SO. : t _ , 4 d.L Ewm y— - n err. — — X \/ IL.dM II / j'� ♦ y �/ DRIV I I 1 I , Naadl! y \ � ♦ ♦ I �/ ' fwo-w� - i tN I- ♦ y to I , I 1 Oa■I [�ilr e�i , \ `♦ //� j I L �1 Ii/ . I I at•�o olo I 1 I 1 I I Ma aas� T S I i f - i_ ` /� I IA Dwa r w II Nq•gY0 -Z.iyla 1'am cLwsslllbf / I ' I I R E,.I,,,. � r `• I I III y \ I Dm" PJM c�a® n 1� • SAV �a„�•�` APPNOa6p SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLMTON VERMONT LEGEND ysy — —aa WAWY ■ M UWE — —rw rasa WN --� —CE olo*" a m= — —Iz M eomno — — ur wPaw-* mmc* — — • 0Af L* — — of a* GI wow Lw o" mAwff som aWprt m • NOW*— ® o III"W*m 7c ;C -PAW • • &LrF- r ■ ■ CARN AA* a Pao told ® OFIjoma I oAn I MN I aanmox I OVERALL CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN .A. OMIfpIC -a. NOV.. 2004 SCAB - C1.0 P30J. NO. 02250 Cu d m a r Ln O N O LO CO N_ m O CIO C E a O LO CV (V CD 0) 3 0 LO CV CV O N O 0 SN Cn C) d O a. '^0^ 11J <l C3 0 PATH CE FORCE "J;:SERIA CURET STOP SERVICE TO / � -,' ` _ / � 1 EIEro►P DIY 1— IOC , /\03+00 I \) PROPOSED H.DRANT 1` �\ C4 VP10 0 / UNE 1D+ RELOCATEDRrVE Sn + Rl V,�// \\ GRAPHIC SCALE �1^ -----------t' \ // IN FEET) I Inch � 40 It / PARTIAL SITE PLAN ;' `-'� HIGH POINT ELEV = 391.83 ;r TF2 106+00 - H - LOW POINT ELEV - 389.62 PVI STA 102+00 - 04 LOW POINT STA - 100+07.5 PVI ELEV - 392.00 LOW POINT EI.EV - 388.64 PVI ST - 100+20 A.D. - -2.78 LOW POINT ST - 104+59.36 A.D. - 1.32 50,00 ' VC PVI ELEV - 388.35 K 18.97 4 00 25. 000' VC K 0.64 ^ n N n 100.00 0' VC ul q M + O .'mil m HYD m 196 `�' ..NEW VALVE IYP.) N m w NEW H VAL RANT TYP. 6i Lli Ci " > 1 a 192 _ w FINISH - a 1 GRADE oox $ ab EIaSTING — — GRADE Is, HOPE ____ PE____ 18• 14DPE- STORM D I CLb2 DI Ted 8 VALVES 184 8• VALVE CL62 TEE de CAPCi T777---DRAIN ao RIGID J�NCOAVRE IRED MINI IS NOT BTH Y E EN NEER 376 $76 - $72 EE. ,O o -� �a ry n <Y n ^ no o n I o o om 1C ^ n Oil - ' Gi m n O 01 n Oi hO�i Oi ymj 0) 01 h ^ ap hT ._ m MOI ri Yi 16� nn iU 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 IU4+Bo luS+Uu PROFU STATION 100+00 TO 109+00 1" 40 HORRONTAL tut+uu i u l— --u i vorvv SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, P.O. BOX485 SHELBURNE, VI 05482 B0 05� FAX 50Y-0N&1 wDP wvw.cee N.rom F'E7D LOCATE DRIVE DIIA1 PJM Or CURE► CUTS (41E' TYP) 7EpR u CMUD SAV A A /y.•�o TO FT APPROTR SAVD PROJECT: r 5SM� 42ot m I SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET cc��' RIIISOUTH BURLINGTON -�3 7 VERMONT Pie+W •393,35 OUT-1313 w STA �75 fly LEGEND —d.— EROPow OCI mm nor" mopm — —O wWrY sr" LW — —r11— S ORDE W+1 — —OE Okla, AD ELIOM — — Lw Oprlan t S+ILOI■O — — O - _ � ODA m ® OAS�! ll1� ST" DR~ LW MAWrf =*m mrMuff • API W — O now WNm rx xt xr>MAx� s ■ • BfifR-p► ■ oATa aAe1, POAMml Y am or *oaoa ~^ E 9 V 7 .. Rlt[ CN6CIR0 R61'ISIDN V of So. Sudinot n ROAD PLAN and PROFILE DATE DMNING NUYBRR NOV., 2004 scAu AS SHOWN C1.1 PROD. NO. 02250 7 c0 4) a cc CC� G� a N- O Lo O 00 N M O 3 C SITE ENGINEER: sT� f10+76 GRAPHIC SCALE I wy-aw,e s)Ir+ �x 6� TM f Po r I (� C I C�1.� .7 NV OU74ie62 C� ► 3Po�A1A��t3;+'� FoD LocAIE OPo1� T Z I FATFi A INN- .7 q. /7 ► g1V fee a %10 CUPo! CUTS ( 16' TYP) w( IN FEET )p I �� Fal ouTV�e.e RIM 6.4 M 39e.� NV wT-3ee.7 INw��+7.� W IE.+ply �� '>T�� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Po 7 l inch - 4o IG I INV1'�99A INw�22 � ____----'" _ P.O. BO1(196 SHELBURNE, VT 05I82 _ _ 802-M6 Y3 FAX B01-0BS?1T1 xaE.' MWw.tas-vlmm LLI _-________ _ _ - _ awl woo., 9+0--- -_ -- __ _ --- _ --- ------ - ----------- _" --- - BJM ---- _ 6+0o z+a6 ------ _ --1u oo --- ----a oo, `1i5 _ __ n3+00_ - - ,aa ------ r+o+na_ ---------- P �J p\C 44 - SAV 0 -- _ PROJECT: 92_1 f iII fI ---- -------- --_--9 3 SPEAR -- — — —19p ►MEADOWS aVALVE (nn ---- F II i►V9.e 16 I � l � I — — — — — — of - - —_ _ — — — — — •,I I I � _ _ I I �'. I I C�inmm'sro � � I �+ �► � I � I I SPEAR STREET I I I I I I I I NV aZe a I I I -- SOUTH BURLINGTON - VERMONT 'i. I I ICI ,-c 11 ICI - l I 14 S* L,'j t"' I L— — _ — — - - — - - + - 392 - a�►vmr �ERJ — — — — _O M ---r�---- --- -- —J sl ---i" I I I 1• I .01 15 -- --�=---f--- I I J I *D MAT T e -- HIGH POINT ELEV - 399.59 HIGH POINT STA , 115+93.43 PM STA - 116+05.70 PVI ELEV - 399.91 A.D. _ -2.65 K - 37.73 100.0000' VC M.9 uow���I�11� Ell= _llm �01 _________mmmmmmm m mmmmmmmm mmmmmm 109+00 110+00 111+UU nz+uu I-- PItOFU n++vo STATION 109+00 TO 118+50 1' � 4' VERTICAL 1' � �0' FIOR¢ONTAL ... LEGMD Oal(IaYt r. MO! L� •� ak►IM WO LM of il, a olaerAe e:�lwo 11 C�—u� ul�el�la�p nral�o — — aR NFolalalllP mauolR — — aAt LIR o — — aR w" aMgw L* 0,, &AWIIL' "M aLEMIOUT m 0 go- w11 — 0 o mw YAw" » :CA PC* ME r.-. mac IF jlDoos BATc avcnB BeT19toN ROAD PLAN and PROFILE BATS BBA+BIG N�YB6N NOV., 2004 xAas AS SHOWN C1.2 pm. NB. 02250 m N C. LO c� 6 . a: CV N (N O Lo O (V M C) MATCHUNE SHEET C1. S D LOCATE DPoVE CURB CUTS *A,m� CURB E mp (TIP W-1 w— 1 \ ° «n \ I ` I I �---�; 15 O FM I INwsen6e' 11 yy 1 1 I 16 � � II 1 I d,� I 10=31L1-r-0 II 1 O, I — _ yid — — — 1 •Mr..w•• — — N j `m •391,67 ` ` — a � VALVE ) RIL�So2,a C�0�1V��aOU 7 1 IAI�i�. I 1 • + + + • INy�3Y0.0 I \, 00 9 h gip(, r� INV�ti 26 / ounu smw \ (NJ= "o 10 ,0, \MIMI kv / , SITE ENGINEER: SwH p 301� po may° 125+0 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. 19 - - - P.O. BOX 485 SHEIBURNE. Vr 054V dOt-093 = FAX B Q-0N " ..e wxrw. — 1:MEN ,,,!7. —r 147+00 Z OG i IN FEET 1 ao IL 3 � m M4 / , I�.�� I�,n ' 13 - I 11'L 1 �' - ^ li ° PARTIAL I SI?E PLAN " 9+70 • • 0 s • • • • • • - - - - - - �Iy�7BB D 1 =40 ►ry fit° r---, - HIGH POINT ELEV - 395.55 HIGH POINT ELEV - 394.49 HIGH POINT STA - 124+41.13 PH STA 124+$0 LOW POINT ELEV - 393.02 HIGH POINT STA - 126+74.27 ; PIA STA - 121 .• mom NMI m_ m_m_I _fdm _myy,1y - _____- Em_I _�7 _____- 04 .Do 196 I92 166 ,54 ao 176 172 116+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 J21M r 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 127+35 SA11118+50 fT �t2��Vy��77IL V r4,;10 ALAL SPEAR MEADOWS RECEIVED MAP, 3cCcsj i`sj7 —�.-- cw"owma mwmm,w1°m — —w '"'mMe" Lw — —rY— rolls WA — —1! Ilmal " c°clwa — —ur '*powwl0-womw —a "sLw — —sT mw M*#m Lw O= MAWN "1 C "Wff ® o .IO� W►�lus >x CAml mA* w po* mz m of Wom I x—s I cN[ D 1 ssnsloN 1 MA0 = i and PROFILE OAT[ V mV N..... NOV., 2004 lau AS SHOWN C1.3 PRO=. No. 02250 03 a� a a N C\I O Lo O 00 N M O O7 C E SITE ENGINEER: I d I / CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SwH p I P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, Vf 05412 CQ 7 %A �1-16+03MO6 l�µ� '� HIV W T-3B6.2 I I FTE1D LOCATE DRIVE CURB CUTS (1�1-iQ) �4 INV 39LO 0 I � eo W"= FAX Raz-Pesazn PJM ___ ___ ___ _ _ _ io' nq� 3gg _ cusciao w n - _ --- - -"------ •11j+oo "-------- 11- - 114 OO It '' i- zol+oq--__ z9z --- _ _ _ _ _ . - --- 203+0o - 3 0 -----------�- _REtxtEA - TH"----- - 39�-__ CL62 Dl ---�- __- -' -- APPROYRD SAV --- --f-� I'_ EEs ------------ tDRAN -J 4 - z 3,+ ------ s-------- \ z i �s \ L-------- --- a I 11Z 17 W r- -" r 1fi III ...... ;== SERVICE /. �� 3g A► _ M, I I CrrP I I a� I I I �o / / . .. .. . �"°PAv r �\ 6 VALE �IVE i I ,SfR KiETO yBE 1EP I I I I ORAVETY"SE R I ( I �iV OUT 380.0 BEYOI� OiIT t Lot 14 Lj �"N. - ST o 39--- L--- ss/ � ��� `�� \ GRAPHIC SCALE I ' I 15 °yA"R �+�`--�35U �h :E 0',t J--�- - 1 _ PAMM SITE PLAN HIGH POINT ELEV - 399.57 HIGH POINT STA - 200+11.55 PVI STA - 200+36.55 HIGH POINT ELEV - 397.82 PVI ELEV - 399.57 HIGH POINT STA - 206+03.78 A.D. - -1.18 LOW POINT ELEV - 395.35 PM STA - 206+00 K - 42.50 LOW POINT STA - 204+15.70 PM ELEV - 398.00 50.0000' vC PH STA - 204+25 A.D. - -2.98 PIA ELEV - A.O. K - 16.79 34.59.89 K - 34.59 - 50.0000 VC u' r 100.0000' VC �� 404 400 396 392 388 384 O n A a g a W N Ol n n m W KNISH GRADE Y m Y W Y - DaSTING --- GRADE 8 2 DI n n n„ o m rn ,a0,1 N ♦ .- n m- - n o n 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+DO 205+00 PROME STATION 200+00 TO42V0771+130 1` - HOPozaNr�AL 404�' 7 d ? v f, Of 400 vO MATCH rPAVEN G ���• 1�%7 396 392 388 SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LEGEND _ _ -,�_ oarlrw mlRaw —di— mods — —O PrArom O*wm •AAA 801111 LINE — — *%— L* — —CE Ovor"OJA6m — —UK 13joym — — UT Ulp■IY1011p 16OMW -- —• wU1 91=Q o•oo= U 9 o� aUVm' � oiA►PIT ® O s��RV WIHm l x ix T H= • • >1M1E-� ■ W,ai urn n. POOR ME rwvv,-vw� Em Q *me RIPIRIom 384 ROAD PLAN and PROFILE D DATE DRA1fING NllYR6R NOV., 2004 1C AS SHOWN C1A PROD. NO. 02250 o GRAPHIC SCALE I I I I I � \ t L I � � / = I I I i 90 �y/11{� II� WV OUi�370.0 I / I L _ I I � I I � o�ETa■Cl�rr I i � I I L I , 1 rl II I I I 1 I I I I WH B CL I RIj�371i0 I 1 I lyv e1-373.ffi I I ' I j I I I E � ' I � v ( IN FEET I \ I inch = 40 ft PARTIAL 97E PLAN � _ _ 1'=40- EXISTING SMH 3 37( 37: STABIUZAnON FABRIC MIRAF SOOX OR APPROVED EOUAL g $ry i2 N n FINISHED ++ x GRAM a E OSTING GRADE 92 � I e GRAVE ACCESS DRIVE - SEE L ABOVE Iso i 8rg 10 m OD F 06 %> o� RIGID INSULATION AS EQUIRED ERE lg AJNTAINMEID 41mum CO OR AS DIFECTED � is No wB N n N n n n n o n o w n n r r: n Q n n 300+00 301+00 302+00 303+00 �p�� 304+00 30UK STATION 300+00 TO 30"51 1' -; VERTM.AL 1. - 40? FiOFOZdjTAL 305+00 306+00 RECEIVED C.;y ci So_ S; ,P.. � t i A�TEAR STREET SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.D. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, Vr 05/82 Bet-0R"= FAXRR2-085- n w www.oesM- 0." PJM CN.C..D A � • SAV APPROY® PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLNGTON VERMONT LEGEND co■w o*raw —as— — reor� 011j" Appm pwpw r uw Aluk — —ry— robe 4Aq — —off—oraarAo ■ffiem — —u uw■raralAp ■EMM — — ur uw o"ll) me"o w — —0 —*ASLI* — —ST vow mmom VR O,, WAMry Wr aWpff m • -0 Vm— ® p lmrw 4AI mz � � NmI1Akr s • ■ T-W ■ ■ CAWH " Po*m ME mac a *am SEWER LINE CONNECTION at SPEAR PLAN and PROFILE .AT. OMIIM. NV.MR NOV., 2004 9CAL6 AS SHOWN I C1.5 PRRJ. NO- 02250 cc a) CL Cu 8' N' M N_ 1�h O to O 00 N C7 O 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 24' z Er TAPPd10 SSI.EEVE AND VALVE uMENEciI'o►1� To siREET ; -- ----- G UVM and State Agricultural College / 40C 39C 39' 381 38A z 371 37, 368 R. and M. Skiff +00 --- --- - --_ 6?00------- '- - •-ErER�_— --r GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET)- 1 Inch m 40 (l 1 PARTIAL. SI?E LM 1 "=40' I �---L- --1— — — - — J SITE ENGINEER: I � '% IEIW3�897 � CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHE1BURNF, VF 05482 B%-9Y5TSt9 FA%' tl02-09SZP1 .4 w»w.ceavtcvm or PJM +39Z7 INV OUT RIM INve9.9 CI.. SAV p p ArrNovED SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS $ SPEAR STREET i z., SOUTH BURUNGTON VEFIMONT Mail ' lIIC. n n n ------------------- STRM 24 8 T I AND VAL 7msm4 TE LOCA 24" WATER OF TMN m n n n m o m n n o0o n m n cq 0 m n m n m n m n Iq n 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 WA70 LINE PROFILE STATION 0+00 TO 10+05 Y - 4' VFRIICAL 1' - 40' HORIZONTAL /+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 LEGEND _......_..,,,........._....- E30i 01hri" --�-- vw" EI1r� — —s -AWrY 1E*M U* rom WA — -1Y IWm UW — --OE OV130W 12eCrM — -ue UIq)M t0L*p UWW -- ---or aPMO W TUFPRaW -- -o "sLw o a WrY -" QEA"ff m m -fp WNW ® O -OW IAMME j" VALVE ■ ■ CATw LA* 4 TEE POO POE wwY .-" mac Or *owe DATE CIIEC[BD IBVI410N WATER EXTENSION PLAN and PROFILE DAn Dwane ND�eDEN NOV., 2004 SCALE AS SHOWN C1.6 1-1. N.- 02250 cu Iv cua 11 0 N O LO O 00 N cv) O 3 cm c E O u') N N 0 IT 'O u7 N N O N O O In U N O 4. ❑ N.- :iIF: W, k 141i 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 SITE ENGINEER: C CIYIE ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, 1T 054B2 BOA9s1 3 mx so49B5- 1 -& wwv.eA.+Q— oml or PJM cm— A A SAV �4 •I„o APPROVID SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLWOTON VERMONT LEGEND —am — — — — PRIVIMI ArPLL x rommm L* imm � — —rN— rasa Wq — —cm 010131 o n�an•o — —La u1F■tello" 12joam — — UT WINDOW" 119rPHft -- — 0 Ga Lm f10LLW aMNAQ L* 0" —wry lop m k"ff m • � WM+a� ® O smu WN+ac HVMAW ■Nr-a. POAM ME l DAW ImE RWIsIoN IvECEr cse, off: -_ ROAD SECTION at 107+25 OATI DRA1lQIC NUNNII NOV., 2004 9CAli - 40' C1.7 1-1. No. 02250 c0 N 0. IL CQ d' N O L0 O co N cf) O 3 cu c E 2 c. 0 In N N 0 3 O LO N N O i N O O N U) U Imo' 0 0 w g �-� - �7 DMH #5- RIM=3';87.8 FES 1 I I � T ` / -- W - FES 41 - -8--- y SITE ENGINEER: ` '1 INV=384.1 I INV=384.0 i FES INV= 388.E Q I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC, P O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE. V! 05482 1 Q } BOA9B5233J FM 802,DWV71 xeh mrx.cDaNcwn I 1 a 1 STORMWATER �I \\ 1 I 11 �`'; I PJM CHRCRm " p MANAGEMENT1 I \ I 1 ` _ It �s 1 1 I � 1 , � � � ; -�'', '' I s,nv 4 � •,> AREA #1 1 1 I DMH #1 I I RIM=391.0 ' I I - �\ MPRO-D SAV 1 I IINV=388.65 I _\ PROJECT: \1, 1 I 4' ! , I\\ \\ 1 ✓ SPEAR MEADOWS 11 I \I RMJ15 \ 1 1; I I INV=1390.6 -\� 116 SPEAR STREET CB , \ SOUTH BBUU'RLILINT TON VERRIMJ392.2 \\ 1 1 I I ( 11 \ \ INV 390.4 `\ ` OUTLET STRUC. �\\ INV OUT=389.0 \ ; fj 1 - -- - 1 1 1 1 o� 400 I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FES I. AREA #3 INV=389.25 / DMH #3 RIM=394.0 \\ D #2 `\ INV=389.5 I \ I I \ \ RIMS 94.0 \� / INV-3 s5 LEGEND 1 1 I N 1 �. 0-6 ' ` 18ES=384.2 CB #2 \\ 1` I I I U STORMWATER 1 II I I I I MANAGEMENT \ t �; _'� \ RIM= 9 .0 - 3 INV=390.3 ��34 � -� Arrsax Y Wi - -a awrmNP RIM=388\35 I / INV=385.1 ' \� CB #1 1\ \ I �%� �, f I ;- � AREA #2 �` I 1 OUTLET STRUC, \ \ � /�� _. 12 00-as �saMrt+I Ovum"ELED o \ RIM=388.35 �; (�' INV OUT=388.5,, \ 3 2 �00 _ -u ARP naci�o u�oaw�a,Iv INV=385.3 \\ - - I N 1 �` FES INV=388.5 �; CB #17 RIM=393.0 _a _ \\ OUT T STRUC. _ INV T-383.9 Lr� i, 1 #12- I r 1 \ \I ;� INV=390.5 p '9 \�` l - -ar smw1lmw*m1* 0= a'ANn:1b�R m • �RWIMiaE i - _ ;RIM=396.7 RIM=394.7 - - - -- - - _ ` \ ® O naiQ W*u r< \ �\ INV=389.0"INV=391.5 / \ CB #19 swT 6g0+SOI c 118+100 ST � RIM=394.25 POE \\ 1- 6$�i -- - _ INV=390.5 EXEOF*M8 \ // �01 w^ Lill V ill , �. (1 - - DAiH CYRC® R6VIR,DN 1 i H FES=383.5 _ i FES38 j i RI - 0 V=38 3. CB #11 CB #13 ;RIM=39 .3 _ .7 INV=39 .0 RIM=394.7 FES , - --- INV=391.7 INV=388.0 --- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA #1- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA #2- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA #3- STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AREA SITE PLANS -I- SPECIFICATIONS DATE NOV., 2004 ORAiNG NUYHRR scua 1� - 20' C1.8 PROD. ND. 02250 Lv N a CID CL CO N 4 0 L0 00 N C) Q) 3 TOPSOIL. RAKE, SEED & MULCH NOTES: oau 1. Typical trench for water, sewer, and drainage pipe. o 2. Compoction of bockfRI and bedding shall be a ¢ o oOo minimum of 90% (95% under roadway surfaces) o of maximum dry density determined in the a stondo rd Proctor test (ASTM D698 . 3 APPROVED BACKFILL THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3. Bedding material shall not be placed on frozen IN 8" LIFTS subgrode. 0 0 U 2' OF RIGID INSULATION 4. A roved backfill shall not contain ant stones PP WHEREVER TO BE INSTALLEDmore m m than 6' in largest dimension, 2 maximum 9 7 7 MINIMUM COVER CANNOT diameter Within 2' of the outside of the pipe, iD o ..,.... BE MAINTAINED h ALSO or any frozen, or organic materiel. I _ .... D ..,.. 8 .. APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER 5. Trenches shall be completely dewotered prior to '"'I"''%'u'LL': PIPE placing of pipe bedding material and kept dewotered during installation of pipe and backfill. 6' ° o o. ° 6. The sides of trenches 4' or more in depth entered o°O epoo THOROUGHLY COMPACTED by personnel shall be sheeted or sloped to the BEDDING MATERIAL angle of repose as defined by O.S.H, A. standards. 6' ao �� 7. Bedding material far Wastewater lines shall consist of 3/4" crushed stone. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ROCK For water lines bedding material shall be sand. Submit a somple to the Engineer for cpprovol. TMCA �1�J MTAIL YG� B. materials, trench trenches with unstablestabilized Vr1` ,tLi�\/f7 bottom shall first be stabilized byy pplacement of b TS filter fabric then crushed stone (3/4' maximum). EX. BIT. PAVEMENT (BOTH SIDES) MATCH EX. PAVEMENT (MIN. 1 1/2" TYPE III 2' TYPE II) ALL JOINTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED AND COATED WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PRIOR TO PAVING ...................... ... iaj w iT c(x:. . . ....:.. . O O. O pO�@�ygpp{ ® Off6 O O MATCH E%. SUBBASE p p 0 00 O O O 0 0 �10 0 O^ (31 O 00 GRAVEL) CRUSHED p OQ O 0OOQ O p0 p n0 p n0 n0_-0_ e_ O SEE TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AT LEAST ONE- WAY TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES DURING WORK WITHIN ME R.O.W. 2. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC DURING WORK WITHIN THE HIGHWAY R.O.W. SHALL BE PROVIDED N ACCORDANCE IVTH THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION SIGNING IN PLACE. ] ALL BACKFILL SHALL BE MADE N SIX (6•) LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY ACCORDING TO ASTM D59a. 4. REPLACE EXISTING ROAD STRIPING AS NECESSARY. REPLACEMENT OF EXIST. PAVEMENT ED SDR 35 PLUG AUw/ COUNTER SUNK SCREW CAST IRON VALVE CLEANOUT BOX BOX TOP SECTION lax INDEPENDENT w/COVER MARKED OF PIPE "SEWER" 4`CLEANOUT TO BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF BEND(S) IN BUILDING SEWER(S) WHEN 4" SDR 35 PVC CHANGE IN PIPE DIRECTION EXCEEDS 45' WYE 45' (USE LONG SWEEP FITTINGS WHEN EXCEEDING 45') FLOW I 4" SDR 35 PVC CONCRETE CRADLE IN/ 3 MIL POLYETHYLENE PLACED BETWEEN PIPE & CONCRETE TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL P.77 MANHOLE WALL MANHOLE OPENING ABOVE 2'-0" MIN. RADIUS PLAN LEBARON FRAME & COVER f—LC266 TYPE C OR EOUAL ADJUST TO MEET FINISH GRADE. I W �F UUW 48• — m N < 1" RISE 01o0 OO 0�, SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED & SEAL JOINT PRECAST RISER SECTIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED) POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEPS O 8" O.C. WATERTIGHT JOINTS USING MASTIC OR RUBBER GASKET COAT EXTERIOR OF ENTIRE MANHOLE WITH A WATERTIGHT SEALANT (2 COATS) CAST IN PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES OR APPROVED EOUAL (TYP. ALL PIPES) CONCRETE FILL TO HIGHEST CROWN OF PIPE 12' MIN. SOIL OR ROCK 6" MIN. CRUSHED CLASS B CONCRETE STONE BEDDING SHELF AND INVERT N ELEVATION 1. NVERTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ONLY AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF LEAKAGE TEST. 2. EXTERIOR JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED ONLY AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF LEAKAGE TEST. 3. INTERIOR JOINTS SHALL NOT BE GROUTED. 4. IF DEPTH OF MANHOLE IS Y OR LESS FROM RIM TO CENTERLINE INVERT, THEN A FLAT TOP SHOULD BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE CONE SECTION. TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE T.S. WATER MINIMUI BETWEE SEWER NOTES: 1. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE WATER LINE AND THE SEWER LINE. IF THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, CONTACT THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR DESIGN REVISIONS. ALL REVISIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (WATER SUPPLY DIVISION). 2. MAINTAIN 10' MINIMUM SEPARATION (HORIZONTAL) BETWEEN THE SEWER LINE AND WATER LINE. 3. PROVIDE ADEOUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE SEWER/WATER LINE AT ALL CROSSINGS TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT OR ANY DAMAGE. wA7ER/SE1M CROSSING DETAIL T.S. EXISTING LINE 2'-0' MIN, MANHOLE RADIUS WALL NEW LINE raSLO;P MANHOLE OPENING ABOVE EXISTING a" - SEWER MAIN I I I `REMOVE EXISTING SEWER MAIN IOjIJI AS REOUIRED AND INSTALL NEW MANHOLE, REPAIR SEWER MAIN _PjLAH_ AND SEAL LINE AT MANHOLE WITH GROUT AND REFORM INVERT IN MANHOLE. CORE MANHOLE AND USE PSX PRESS SEAL GASKET (OR APPROVED EOUAL) FOR WATERTIGHT CONSTRUCTION 6" r ^ I PROPOSED e" SOR 35 SEWER CONNECTION EXISTING CONCRETES -REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE I SHELF AND INVERT SHELF AND FORM NEW INVERT 4' 22 1 /2 OR 45 ELBOW 45' SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VF 05482 "4115=3 FAIL 1502446" xvD.' Yw,v.cee•[can D"" OF PJM CffW=O A A SAV +yi•• Aprasrm SAV PROJECT SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH "UNGTON VERMONT — 4- MIN. SDR 35 PVC SEWER SERVICE. CONTINUE TO BUILDING O MIN. SLOPE - 1/4' PER FT. TEMP. END TO BE PLUGGED WTH 4' PVC SEWER WATERTIGHT PLUG AND MARKED MAIN W/ 4'e PVC PIPE EXTENDING FROM SEWER TO 2' MN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE. PLAN DAYS CH-COmIN4X n T2' MIN. 30' SDR 35 PI SWEEP FITTING DISTANCE TO VARY WITH DEPTH OF SEWER SEWER MAIN PVC LTEMPORARY PLUG SLOPE 1/4'/FT. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ELEVATION • CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3 LOCATION TIES TO END OF LATERAL TO BE INCLUDED ON 'AS -BUILT• DRAWINGS (IF CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CONCURRENT WITH LATERAL) • SEE TYPICAL TRENCH FOR BEDDING AND BACKFILL REGUIREMENTS. SEWER and SITE DETAILS DATe DAATIQIG NUYBaY NOV., 2004 .CAR AS SHOWN C 2.0 PROJ. NO. 02250 7 M Qi a C� ^G LL T o ' ti CV 4 O 1n O 00 ao CV C) O 3 1' MAX AWWA HYDRANT, VALVE AND FINISH GRADE ADJUSTABLE IRON CURB BOX APPURTENANCES AS PER SPECS W/LID MARKED 'WATER" ADJUSTABLE IRON i N VALVE BOX W/LID I MARKED WATER' Z ip /-FINISH GRADE PLUG HYDRANT So DRAIN v COARSE GRAVEL OR = PEASTONE TO REDUCING 1 CY VOLUME o ANCHOR TEE 6" MIN. I THRUST 6' D.I. BLOCK THRUST BLOCK ANCHOR COUPLING OR SPOOL PIECE UNDISTURBED WITH MEGA -LUG GLANDS SOIL 6" M.J. RESILIENT 3/4" CRUSHED STONE FOR WEDGE GATE VALVE VALVE SUPPORT NOTES: 1. ALL BRANCH PIPING AND FITTINGS SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINT. 2. HYDRANTS SHALL BE LABELED "ND', FOR NONDRAINING ON THE BONNET FACING THE ROADWAY. 3. ALL FITTINGS ARE TO HAVE MEGA -LUG RETAINER GLANDS. 4. PRIOR TO POURING THRUST BLOCKS ALL FITTING ARE TO BE WRAPPED WITH 4 MIL. POLYETHYLENE. VV C& HYDRANT INSTALLAMON KT'.S. LEBARON FRAME h COVER LC266 TYPE C OR EOUAL ADJUST TO MEET FINISH GRADE. SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED h SEAL JOINT CONE SECTION OR 4'0 TRAFFIC COVER (HEAVY PRECAST RISER SECTIONS DUTY) FOR SHALLOW FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS MANHOLES SHALL NOT BE USED) 24' POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEPS O 8" O.C. WATERTIGHT JOINTS USING w dz Y MASTIC OR RUBBER GASKET F o °2 U , 48" UNLESS OTHERWISE D7� SHOWN PLAN COAT EXTERIOR OF ENTIRE MANHOLE WITH A WATERTIGHT SEALANT (2 COATS) 2 o MIN 0 PIPE o < I (SEE PLANS) W Y m 12 SU IUF GASKETED FLEXIBLE 4 WATERTIGHT CONNECTION 00 0 00 0c 00 12" MIN. UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ROCK 6" MIN. CRUSHED PRECAST CONCRETE OR STONE BEDDING POURED IN PLACE BASE SECTION INSTALL A GOOSE NECK LOOP CURB STOP WATER MAIN CORPORATION STOP MUELLER H-15008 4'x8"x16" SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK 3//4" TYPE "K" / COOPER SERVICE r UNDISTURBED SOIL OR AS SHOWN ON PLAN N-TA ,MIb� 0 NOTES: I. TAPRNG SLEEVES AND VALVES ON CWO TRANSMISSION MAINS ARE TO MEET THE CHAMPLAIN WATER DISTRICT 'STANDARD SPECIFICATION TAPPING FOR TAPPING SLEEVES AND TAPPNG SLEEVE VALVEY DATED NOVEMBER, 1992. ALL OTHER TAPPING SLEEVES AND VALVES ARE TO MEET APPROPRIATE EXISTING 24" DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS WATER MAIN 2. WET TAPS 94ALL BE PREFORMED BY PRE -APPROVED FIRMS ONLY. 1 ALL FITTINGS THAT ARE TO HAVE j CONCRETE POURED ARCUND THEM ARE TO BE WRAPPED NTH 4 m1. POLYETHYLENE PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. 1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (SIZE DETERMINED BY SOIL CONDITIONS) TAPPING SLEEVE I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 12" MAX. PRECAST CONCRETE w/MONOUTHIC BASE_:�w ADJUSTABLE IRON VALVE BOX WITH COVER NARKED "WATER" TAPPING VALVE MECH. JOINT WITH 'MEGA -LUG" RETAINER GLAND OR APPROVED EQUAL 3/4' CORPORATION IN FIRST LENGTH OF PIPE FOR TESTING NEW 8" D.I. PIPE o ` 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING (MIN. 12" THICK) -4 MIL POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTINGS AND CONCRETE V (Ts LEBARON LF248 24' x 24" C.I. GRATE w/4 FLANGED FRAME (OR APPROVED EOUAL) 48' UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLAN SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED PRECAST RISER SECTIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED) WATERTIGHT JOINT USING I' MIN. WIDTH FLEXIBLE GASKET (SEAL EXTERIOR JOINTS AND LIFT HOLES w,/NON SHRINK GROUT) CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES 6 PIPE (SEE PLANS) 6' MIN. CRUSHED GRAVEL *PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC. C478 (LATEST EDITION). Note: All work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for oll Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, and the Village of Jericho. Details should be modified to the above reference specifications. BURIED %2�✓/,.ri.G.22dJi✓[2�\�\\.WIMUM ONE FULL 2Grir%/..rir. 'G.`& ANCHOR t�r. CONCRETE LENGTH OF RPEBEARING 1-1 SUPPORT VA \� PLUG UNDISTURBED UN. T. SOL WI r` .�i VALW-I" ft NOTE: SOIL h v THRUST 3 P I I. r] 3' 4 6 8' 1 1 " CONanON CONDITION SAFE BEARING LOAD PSf • SIP ILL 4]' na M. ff. • W LL 4Y ELL 2Zr Eta • SIT ELL 45' NL 22!' ELL • SIP p8. 4Y [u 22Y ELL • W W ELB ELL 225• ELL 0.5 0.] 0.] 0.5 0.] 1.0 0.5 0.a I a 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 2.5 1.5 5 SaX1D SHALE 10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.3 1.] 2.0 1.0 0.5 10 4.0 2.0 1.0 4.5 5.5 15 14.17.512.0 4,000 1.0 1.3 1.0 QS 2.0 2.! 1.! 1.0 15 10 10 t.516.018.515.0 M7.O .0 0,000 L5 2.5 La 1.0 2A 1! 2.0 1.0 15 7.3 40 2.0 9.0 11 7.0 .0 2,000 10 4.] 2.3 1.a SO 7.0 4.0 2.0 0. 11 5.0 4.0 16 IS 14. ]OFT QAT I.. MA)OYUY WATER PRESSXiE 500 PSI NOTE: REDUCER BEARING AREA . 45- BEND OF LARGER PIPE IHIKW BUM QUAU T:S HIGH STRENGTH NON -SHRINK GROUT CONCRETE CURB NEW CURB SHALL REST /RY ON TOP OF BASIN COVER AS REQUIRED HEIGHTJUST OF CURB ',�} i PRECAST CONCRETE 4" x 4" w/MONOLITIi1C BASE 48' UNLESS OTHER' SHOWN ON PLAN WATERTIGHT JOINT USING 1" -� MIN. WIDTH FLEXIBLE GASKET (SEAL EXTERIOR JOINTS AND LIFT HOLES w/NON SHRINK J GROUT) 18" SUMP LEBARON LF248-2 24" x 24' C.I. CRATE w/3 FLANGED FRAME (OR APPROVED EOUAL) SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR BED BITUMINOUS CONIC. PAVEMENT (1/4'/FT. St. MIN. , M MAX. -PRECAST RISER SECTIONS FOR ADJUSTMENT. (BRICKS SHALL NOT BE USED) CAST -IN -PLACE FLEXIBLE MH SLEEVES 6 PIPE (SEE PLANS) 6" MIN. CRUSHED GRAVEL *PRECAST MANHOLE STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC. C478 (LATEST EDITION). nNW.& QA1W eAM a awe II.T.B SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHEIBURNE, VT O5482 602-W62O25 RIX Raxem-un wm »ww.w..icwR gum OF PJM CRIIXUD A A 4. AV APPROv® �6i SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON VERMONT 66Y1910N WATER and STORM DETAILS DATX NOV., 2004 AS SHOWN PROD. NO. 02250 D1MEING NDY9601 C2.1 cc W .2- co C7' a N n CV d• O Lo 0 00 N M O Q) 3 0 0 U g ASTORM (TYP) - SEE PLANS J v SEWER (TYP) - SEE PLANS J WATER (TYP) - SEE PLANS J SITE ENGINEER: C CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 W2iB =! FAX B02BBS i22i Nat wxw.csKcwn OAA1N OF PJM cxaclao A a SAV �••• �PPNovin SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 3 1/4" BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT: 1 1/4- TYPE III FINISH COURSE 2" TYPE II BASE COURSE 3 1/4- BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT: CONCRETE CURB 1 1/4- TYPE III FINISH COURSE 2" TYPE II BASE COURSE 1' MIN. TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS °o°o°o°o°a° g CRUSHED GRAVEL - 21N o0000000000000o CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE OR I00000000°00 00000000000 0o 0 0 0 0 0 o I10T SPEC. T04.05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o o 0 0° o 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 2" R. BRICK PAVERS 6" (SEE ARCH, PLANS) ...... SEE PLANS 3 BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS 12 CRUSHED GRAVEL - COARSE A SPEC, T01. 0000000o 1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1•.• 5 ._.. .... _. O° o o BRUSHED -GRAVEL - `b'• T , _ ....., . . --COMPACTED SUBGRADE� .. ... .:.::: V '-, . -. •. 000000000000 6- STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFI.:.:'cCRUSH�D°4R°AV�L SOOX OR APPROVED EQUAL ........... G...... :: ; C(iARSE:?::::: .. :::: ? ...,.. 4- TOPSOIL 0 0 > o o„o„o-o„o„o„--o„ o BASEoc 18 0000°o°00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °00000° COMPACTED SUBGRAOEI WCSUB-BASE BANK RUN GRAVEL 0000 o D STABZATION FABRIC MIRAFI ILI MATERIAL ROAD soox OR APPROVED EQUAL ikl ((;�Pf�� Z$6luj N•m '/ v^ 5' UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS 2 1/2- TYPE II BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SIDEWALK o00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o o°o°o°o°o°o°o°000 °o°o°00000°o°o°00000 6- 10" GRAVEL SUBBA$ 6- STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFI UNDISTURBED SOIL OR APPROVED 50OX OR APPROVED EOUAL COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL BI7UMNgm CONCRETE simwm K DEm HIM SIDEWALK WIDTH AS SHOWN ON PLANS 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0000000000000000000a °00000000000000000000 o° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 i 6- 8" GRAVEL SUBBASE 6"\ STABILIZATION FABRIC MIRAFI J UNDISTURBED SOIL OR APPROVED 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL NOTES: 1. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 20• AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PREFORMED JOINT FILLER (1/4 CORK OR BITUMINOUS TYPE) 2. BETWEEN EXPANSION JOINTS THE SIDEWALK SHALL BE DIVIDED AT INTERVALS OF FIVE FEET BY DUMMY JOINTS. TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT ROADWAY SECT= w/CURB N.T.& 7 E TOP OF CURB (SEE PLAN - D TRANSITION FOR TYPE OF CURB) ENEND BEGIN TRANSITION /FACE OF SLOPE / CURB 6'-0" FINISHED GRADE OF ROAD PAVEMENT 92m u FI" 6' 16' DRIVE CURB CUT (TYP) - SEE PLANS 6 BEGIN TRANSITION SLOPE SEECONCRETE . .................:......................::.:.................:::::.:.. :. .... CURB DETAIL SEE ROAD SECTION DETAIL SEE TRANSITION CURB DETAIL I. CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED Io• SECTIONS Ci►�' WITH CURBING LL BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2. CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 0- Buffington EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2- SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK). 3. ASPHALT TREATED FELT TO BE USED BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CONCRETE CURB TOP. CONCRETE am wj"mN" wo N.TA TOP COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT BASE COURSE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1/2" R. -� _ _ 6" . r- 1/4" R. ROAD and SITE DETAILS \i. 1. CURBING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN 10' SECTIONS WITH 1/8- JOINT BETWEEN SECTIONS. 2. CURBING EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED EVERY 20' AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIAL CONFORMING TO AASHTO DESIGNATION M-153 (1/2- own BUMG N—IIER SPONGE RUBBER OR CORK). /��,/��y���� /y � -r CONC M CURB NOV., 2004 RML LS scAu[ AS SHOWN C 2.2 Pm. NO. 02250 7 (9 (v a cu C� C a v CV 4 O Mn O_ 00 CV M O 3 SITE ENGINEER: HANDICAP RAMP NOTES: GENERAL NOTES. 4. LEVEL LANDINGS AT THE BOTTOM OF PERPENDICULAR RAMPS 10. SIGNS, POLES, PLANTERS, MAILBOXES, ETC. SHALL NOT BE LOCATED I5 SIDEWALKS THAT ARE LESS THAN 5' WIDE REQUIRE 5' WIDE BY 5' LONG I. THE DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THIS STANDARD WILL BE SHALL BE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN MARKED CROSSWALKS. WHERE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF SIDEWALK RAMPS. PASSING AREAS (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% CROSS SLOPE) AT INTERVALS C 1. upppessnew do up porrocon ame°�p aen� p eppe, ADHERED TO IN THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK NOT TO EXCEED 200 FEET. rDratedup�nor�djac�ntmmasurveyedpremises Edstln udpgrocsaons ee meteony. rnecmNaee«snanpeldver{ry ea donmcta. M.,ioid cleashapee odetlrotlreEngneen 7neCan ro elan RAMPS . WHERE SIDEWALKS RUN ADJACENT TO ROADWAYS ON STEEP 5. DUMMY JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT TRANSITIONS (GRADE CHANGES) II. WHERE POSSIBLE, SIDEWALK RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE LOCATED WHERE (5% OR GREATER) GRADES, RAMP GRADES WILL BE AS FLAT AS POSSIBLE. AT TOPS AND BOTTOMS OF RAMPS AND FLARES 16. E.O.P. = EDGE OF PAVEMENT cenmo'cr�sarelSeassa-1�ia3jpnwmanycroswcaoN. USERS MUST CROSS DROP INLET GRATES, MANHOLE COVERS OR OTHER z. aradsdnew�Mesnw rateemromemwdesl Hanes e„ne denad Oesin°d/caradw °epee,e �acradeypa ( ON LOW SIDE OF DRIVES AND INTERSECTING SIDE STREETS, RAMPS SHALL SLOPE TOWARDS DRIVE OR SIDE STREET Q 2%) ACCESS LIDS. IF THIS CANNOT BE AVOIDED THEN GRATE DESIGN AND 6. VERTICAL DROP OFF EDGES RAMPS WILL NOT BE BUILT 17. THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMP STANDARDS DEPICTED HERE MAY CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. E� PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS IC PEDESTRIANS. THE RAMP ABUTS AN AREA WHICH WILL NOT BE USED BY PEDESTRIANS. NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL LOCATIONS FIELD CONDITIONS P.O.BOX 1p5 05482 s Theoeneacroit// °alnmrnes-n"mpren,(wpe° t,,th" Wn mWrdwadas. Trroseplans snalleasue�nmadromaowna.aria �°a�uarwdNlProhcL 2. NOMINAL RAMP DIMENSIONS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. 12. CURB DRAINAGE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO PRECLUDE T1$ FAX =RNE, Tt BO�ABi2 ' "�'z" "ge' -1, a. The RAMP WIDTH - 5'-0' MINIMUM RAMP SLOPE 8.3% MAXIMUM 7. � VERTICAL 'LIP' OR 'CURB REVEAL' WILL BE PROVIDED WHERE DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SHEET THE RAND ADJOINS THE ROADWAY. FLOW OF WATER PAST THE SIDEWALK RAMP. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE ON ALTERATION PROJECTS AND 5. a.)as.acmranelreperdesowasndcnroetleass(cnwwrma afie)asedrectormdfnwYresupormeconswdn°n. Ali prassedareas shelf bemaintained until f pvegemdonIseadeWsned. FLARE SLOPE I0% MAXIMUM RAMP CROSS SLOPE - 2.0% MAXIMUM WHEN STRUCTURALLY PRACTICABLE ON NEW CONSTRUCTION 13. WHEREVER FEASIBLE, TWO SIDEWALK PAWS ARE RECOMMENDED IN PROJECTS AS REQUIRED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES °ATM PJM cl e. MalnWnaptreeaoWts/decrconafNcddnpMte. B. AT MARKED CROSSWALKS, THE FULL WIDTH THE RAMP OR LANDING PREFERENCE TO A SINGLE RAMP. ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 7. The CwreecmrsMneerespon.IDle/oreNwdvkrpcavvary/dcanplete ummes. 3. A LEVEL LANDING (NO GREATER THAN 2.0% SLOPE IN ANY M SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS. cNRCRRv SAV n a * and opa,aemomdasand DIRECTION) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE TOP OF SIDEWALK RAMPS TO ALLOW FOR STOPPING AND MANEUVERING OF WHEELCHAIRS 14. JOINTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT 9. WHERE POSSIBLE, RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE LOCATED 18. IN ADDITION, ALL WORK MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE • fifM�� SIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS, HOWEVER EXPANSION JOINTS WITHIN OUTSIDE THE DIRECT LINE OF TRAVEL MOST LIKELY TO BE FOLLOWED CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONS PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. �PRov� SIDEWALK RAMP AREA WILL BE AVOIDED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. SAV SAV BY THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. S. The Coneactor snarl sutmAanop drawings for all mama and materiels w0antad ore snap r,oe eepp� on anypain u.an a.ppnord shop d an"O LNrs PROJECT: Q. ��eeqquu ft 0. CCon�tmclo, °-plefe thftements et In e -k IIn aoco�id�enc. ft n4 condMnns and Me City of sam Burfthns Puelfo W-ft Arlp SIDEWALK SPEAR 10. The tolenence to, pnrsn grades for sp pavement walla eys and lawn er/dewafieeg.1tee` RAMP MEADOWS 11. acoysdweeaafedred as°Pnert of the oo e'cf an°"ncop°s.,o,.X.# ee 12. rasponsromty. All ew n veN.s, covens and prams wmen me conswctfm UMAX step be adp stadtdo finish grade per_"�R�1l(�T 6' MIN. 6' MIN R 8' MAX. AW CURB RAMP 8' MAX 13. The Connector~ Instep the gas, electrical and telapnone semoaa In accordance wMl the Willy companlaa requfternenb. Tll PARIILLf1 4 SPEAR STREET 14. Edaprrgpaverragardereeseemparoeeramovedsnarreadlsposeew �24' LEVEL 2/' EXAMPLE 2 SIDEWALK AND CURB MIN LANDING ROADWAY w ROADWAY SOUTH BURUNGTON Jape n�emapmr=onspelooadovt ANpavemxxootashepeemadawrma SEPARATED BY GRASS STRIP -__ �� SURFACE VERMONT ip. ffdrereare any coNmclsor inconsistencies wfththarns apecmatone me eon actwMallcontacttheEnpinee lc°r eMceaon EXAMPLE I : SIDLALKA.DJA.CEN.T. 5.0% MAX. SA7. MAX. --y �---� t-1 eefo'e'v°'f`c°"d"ue°°n ft ft in question TO B.3% MI I ADJACENT 8.3X MAX. ADJACENT DETECTABLE WARNING TO RAMP TO RAMP LEVEL LANDING " DETECTABLE WARNING DETECTABLE WARNING V/ DETECTABLE CURB RAMP WARNING B B SECM SECM IFS V V L TRANSITION Y RAMP •SIDEWALK -'�CURB 8.3% MAX. p 7'-0' MINA GRASS 8.3% - STRIP MAX. CURB 24'� CURB CURB MIN SECTD7M C-C T8 e BROOM FINISH EXAMPLEPAIRED ADJACENT SURFACESFULL WIDTH DETECTABLE AT 2� CORNER 24' 6' MIN.(TYP 4'-0' MIN � 8' MAX SIDEWALK CURB RAMP RAMP WARNING } r DETAILS ORLANTER OR 8' MAX. 4' NSV�RSABLEPLANTER TOTHER RAHER OBSTACLE l DETECTABLE I ROADWAY WARNING Sl1RFACEDIRECTION OF DETECTABLE VARNINC PI.ACEIiNT � TRAVEL jSIllVALKCURB 8.%Nq)(,5.0%MAX. SewDETECTABLE ADJACENT TO 507. MINIMUM TO SQUARE PATTERN, PARALLEL ALIGNMENT vARNiNG SECTM RAMP6BASE F • • `DETECTABLE CURB RAW RAID NRB TRANSITION CIAtB TRANSITION FLARE CURB RAMP (iTP) 7'-0' MIN. I 7'-0' MIN DIIAMETRMUM ADJACENT SURFACE 'jl OF RAMP / LEVEL LANDING (SEE O 0 DETECTABLE 0.2' WARNING NOTE B 5) 1.6' MIN son CN6CY[O REYIs10N ------ -.� f.- 0.9' MIN. 2.4' MAX. WARNING CURB 1.4' MA%. 11LMri MAX �_ ---- SECTIDI B-B SECTBUI C-C DETECTABLE VAR" DETAILS IN � BASEMra EXAMPLE 2: DETECTABLE WARNING NOTES: BASE SINGLE RAMP SPACING ON CORNER RADIUS EXAMPLE 3: RAMP ON TANGENT 1. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PAID FOR U SECTION AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT. 2. CONCRETE ADJACENT TO ALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL p 4' X 4' LANDING 4'-0' MIN. MAX - 2% CROSS SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION HAVE A BROOM FINISH. 3. THE COLOR [IF THE DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL PROVIDE A VISUAL CONTRAST TO THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AND SHALL SITE DETAILS SEE NOTE 4 BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 4. TRUNCATED DOMES SHALL BE ALIGNED ON A SQUARE GRID ftcl 8.33% IN THE PREDOMINANT DIRECTION OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. ' C 2'0X I 1 5. FOR SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOME PRODUCTS, A MAXIMUM 0.25' C C VERTICAL CHANGE IN LEVEL IS ALLOWED. FOR CHANGES IN LEVEL BETWEEN �a 24• r 025' AND 0.50', A BEVEL WITH A MAXIMUM 1:2 SLOPE IS REQUIRED. CHANGES CURB --- IN LEVEL GREATER THAN 0.50' MUST BE TREATED AS A RAMP - s�rR NOV., 2004 sRewrnc nvaasa 1L CURB RAMP W/ DETECTABLE 60' DETECTABLE /. MAXIMUM SLOPE. 6. SEE THE CITY OF BURLINGTEN FOR A LIST OF ACCEPTABLE DETECTABLE WARNING MIN. WARNING WARNINGS MANUFACTURERS FOR ANY WARNINGS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SCALE EIWAL NAME RAMP -WIPE 2 AS SHOWN C2.3 DETECTABLE IMENING DETAILS T s F PRO). NO. 02250 cv a) cun. a o� 00 IN Itt ul C] 00 CV M O 3 MINIMUM 1'0 ROCK PLACE FILTER FABRIIC PLACED AROUND AND BETWEEN INLET GRATE TO THE TOP OF AND FRAME CONCRETE BLOCKS III PLACED AROUND •• WRE SCREEN FILM CONCRETE BLOCKS STACKED 1 OR 2 LAYERS HIGH PLACED AROUND CATCH BASIN MINIMUM 1'0 ROCK WIRE SCREEN PLACED AROUND AND ■/ 0.5' OPENINGS THE TOP N PLACED AROUND TO CONCRETEIL BLOCKS CONCRETE BLOCKS 2' EXISTING (MIN.) GRADE 18' TO 2'-0' SEE GRADING _ PLAN riam vllaw CURB IN ILEISANDBA SEDIMENT BARRIER BAN 3 A TO BE USED PRIMARILY WHERE SLOPE EXCEEDS TYPE X STONE 5% < FILL (1'-O- MIN. ZS THICKNESS) STONE FILLSTABILIZATION TYPE I, 1'-0' THICK MIN. FABRIC CULVERT TYPE II, 2'-D' THICK MIN. A END secnoN S7ABILZATION FABRIC CONTINUE STONE SM NRAn 500X OR FILL IF REOUIRED Km APPROVED EOUAL DIMOMM MILLAAY Km — iFa ,.ts EnosD11 Gol(maEtADE NPEx aw r wr FILTER FABRIC TYPE I STONE MIRAFI 140NS FILL PAD OR EOUAL 1'-0' sEcmoN N.T.S. AV= 4 AE•Oo saw #w /ff/AIOIDr l A•olaokr.,r®,YpAMMM d A,.I. �' n•l a »fix a i� ma �• a Pr 4uav *vo .aaff it ArM.10 Afrtmmr U- Mo STRAW ANCHORING N.T.S. IV MIN. C/N91ED STONE EXISTNG GRADE CROSS-SECTION l r 4 � l ►.' : l l . .'� 1.4 ' .11. AUM 4 Raw lW�!KY KYAW .ffi710 ®GlS EROSION BLANKETS & TURF REINFORCEMENT MATS SLOPE INSTALLATION u MPHGRARY SEEDING k rxr —71—. TPOSTS AND VATE A 4'X9' ANGLE 10CH, SET POST UPSLOPE NSLOPE. STABILITY AND iX SELF CLEA ' MIN. 3. ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO THE WARE FENCING 2. STAPLE THE WARE MESH FENCING TO WIRE POSTS. FENCING 4. STAPLE THE WRE MESH FENCING TO FILTER AND EXTEND IT TO END POSTS. FABRIC THE TRENCH. COMPACTS II -A BACKFILL ) TAL N.T.S. SITE ENGINEER: 0 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VF 05482 902-0e0-zffis FAX 90299 71 -6 •vw.ce•N.00m 9AARN OF PJM SAV N�r�eee APP9or® SAV PROJECT: SPEAR MEADOWS SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURUNGTON VERMONT ■ol... EROSION CONTROL DETAILS DATE ORATNC NUM99N NOV., 2004 WA. AS SHOWN C 2.4 P— NO. 02250 P:WutoCADD.Projects\2002\02250\dwg\02250-Specifications.dwg, 03/28/05 04:31:03, PM, cgalipeau T ii T§ P T T T ppir 8 9 Elet 83g r'�r i ifR 9 till fill IT; p fir %}} r Y R g¢ g Y p TE Ti3 P A P T§ $g it $ g T P. w Fit � T � # � Flit �M " � J i � �I lit 3lit 9� Y 5 t a1 2 � g It % i k tt I 1 1 fill vig- lair i It �• 7 t Rw R � 3 � % i� � rg t stye, TP Tit ea Y lit ti' Y Y • Ry q it I*q b Y 3d R S R 4 Rf Y if Mpg f wN r 6 9 +a 9Y fig $ r w ?I8 r T Y P T B T s Q p w T s T 8 litr « r Y�� till rIt ilt g t lip litt . $ rq�R 9I%R T s S R 7 � 3 w qp 9 4 till I litZ: I Mi it, litgg sY 911 lit Fri YdR6gg mll }$� Y s IF r � q� y� 98 gg ;r c A ggl. all $ Y ooB'ilg' �� � � ooS8g � R i oo�i ii K,a$H: T H T S X P i^ P $i sit g t$a FRO if I$ 1 4�g R $k Y t a t aF � 11 1 9ggs It g '$ Y r R till 1, 1 g Y R �q R y g" a%tj i iF �•� s i r IT y B a to � ai� i4a Y 3�� Yiy i Y Y [is, Will ' s l � MORN d3i q I t i it 0 c S �a iiqq Ana % ► '0 (A9 co c o 'V m _.J S 0 co � Z A 1l c� �_ r�' DCo �� 21 o o f ® 0 C0 Z o Z _ P:\AutoCADp Projects\2002\02250\dwg\02250-Specifications.dwg, 03/28/05 04:31:29 PM, cgalipeau a N P t W Faso gg € s g lot Ral FRI = R $ ff g a of 4 of g3Y 9Y =YAx �€ g s 9 $ Y, >§I p r P I p ;. g 11 p p p- rQ >g8 f p 1 ' $ P p P rgc. fi g N a �� I g � sg N $ > UR $ g g , R �°R a Ys s R $ s a 7 R Y sY Y of g Y R Yg R Aug i4l fa P, I It lit aFs� a af tilt; Yg 7'* s K >~t g • Ric f 5� a _ g ergs ,fig gIt fig gIt� tit iggg gg gg g _ aXat $ R IRx tj 9. 2 1 g� liftpwto 7- Y � 3 It Y Y tv fit � h Fit l n€ r r8 p P >S rs rs a p P rNs ?I pp P P p p P >s >s Y it Iff ffir ii R $ s g '� t I I III i Y ji Z $ g�' I,Y ! � � i �y aF� �i Y ��� A� 121 • q t ;f $ < $4Y g sa Y s ig It 3 s 3= �Y Y t 91, sItg p p P > r& T R r s T§ P > o > T S p P T p p P r Ps p P T S p P it ty.11 o l > $ g �1 I i Y � 9 hP �+ � tt�ii�1 14 �YY i�3 9 "s s Y sg �, 3 $R Yea s Sif g Y _ qj IIIa s It" p g8 W g Y i� c� 9� � of Y 11 Y$ af4 •1Yi� P� A s Is , � a a ! � � Ne COr 25 c - y fA9 W N 1 1 1 *cam to Z A as L � mZ �m D � D O D0 $> n c CO 4� M ED n P:1AutoCADU Projects12002102250\dwg\02250-Specifications.dwg, 03/28/05 04:31:49 PM, cgalipeau lit91 Niq s Y e 3 Ii�Rir cq ON �s s 2 F ®r 2 2 9 141 It ff I PH; F § s s ! Irt ; �g =? gq� j° a� `3 g$� $g t lit, Pi R P ,9 a^S Aso , W It a _ iE gs lit° g a t 4tl P t^ P p P T 3 T$ P T 9 p p p Irs 5 -1 j 11 qO` I r Ili I I - 1 13 F1 Fi f t ��� 9 goo R8" " �= sa = ti$_ � �_ tit ;r lq 9�24 $� R —0[ EAR $ R R S & >R fA °11164 lit ill'ta $ E sR 9 ty R� yRY Sq 3R g B If g� K Wr it t1.r ft ri r 1, 11 F I'R FRS S 1 1� �i R T a Tel ° C+i He r�g• q � � �� gR q� fact "5 ��l -y� � � � . Y � �a B � ��� $ + � it-g"'�i �rJrf*1 o�� Q� it 11�' € 1, if tit It I R a 88 g I^ P p P T P T � h n H R r� } P p P T �i rimit lit if twi q 2.2 1 If litR s�> qh-- lit 1�"r 411jr, , lf q 4 R 9 lily ri , g g $ a iRYr g� Rq g 9g 4 r r g S a S t T S P T s T T t Y p P 4 ell l_ R3 R sj ii a q R ry q � 1 ,q1 I a� 9 R 9} , tit Ill ° if R E p P p P P T i P T E3 T 8 _$� r$ _ �S7. If c 9 i =Y 'fl �II91r� % � l iS 9 SR � F � � � � �a�S � $Q9 g !IMF Hill i 4g tj $� q �, 9$$� ° ilk go� -E�#p fig, c Fig R g Rq $ g3 , fir Its s� tq,-�g iq,,q i 3 4 R it; i - ice■ B R z =4� ge R a a�� It 9 $ $ B $ fill. i$ it �aY Lut r $ ; �� i � T I egggg q 9� op DK CJ3Z> (n e 3 D L g o< 0 8 Z m n /� O �-�7 _ z m 2 1 1 n \ ✓, �� �c., .sq '- < m ::0 c D D rK � 7) T D z z n (7 D c rn Z O D$ GJ N z co N c ti; n L P:\AutoCADD Projects\2002\02250\dwg\02250-Specifications.dwg, 03/28/05 04:32:98 PM, cgalipeau w w T$ 1y^ P A P T$ S i T� •Y Y R P P A P. w N 9$F -Rill PY >t tit a•I3 Y� A [ Is Eel i s �^' s� R ISL o 9. gi so R �� $$ : Ytta� =Ai B � tiG S i �'' Y rgY Aq R 3 y 4 Vt �, ii I1SL r a g�'78°R Y $ g s }p��fit y ¢_ # 1 g T� 3 [5g 1g �r } �¢g aaNN g;o g 0$irY $ �$� t }c$B R €i`� ty�4°s4.g a g g $ �1Ng ° g�>I �S& ItR 7g' Yg $ Y YIrgR� �i g 8 a Y Y $a8' A g� 41 s 4 211E;M 161 : • r Y! g Y a g Y Billa sa L 1 l $ 4 a $ off B P p P T$ P T A r P Ts Ts SL Fit IT d $ g '' s JL qfl et 4+ f $ �� P n PI v P I'.g T 9 P T 8 T S ?IR n P T$ T B 1 alit it ;C1111g PP r r• N - M g > � � � t 71C fill, ° 9$��$ AT rR gg fit $R$� I s IF Itis ' • $ gq R R S if !t SL g of ;} Ir tg sIq rl f�� EliF �Y I ri 5qg $ �� S Y aq iIAiIA B iiA fL �7 q1iv $ T P P T$ P P A A P T P ?€ S V Y afB53 g� s $L$ $ Ir: s$ 5 i � i I Y7 r Y 5 1 � R� 5 ILI it lY� — 11i : R4 P i s A n R R r s r �g t — g% 0 3 3 > R R R � _,�� . �gg �, jiq y .g g Sir, ■ ,,a DZ cn� O- N a < co E q o cn< cn^ o > 'm > L <® g n \ / m c)) DOm = z � �z m D �$o !, CC0 W O ° cl' Z T Z n 1 ) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 F,CX (802) 846-4101 March 17, 2004 Eric Farrell 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, VT 05401 Re: 1340 Spear Street Dear Eric: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the December 9, 2003 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, cBetsyMcDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. I ) S-11 c o,&r d1 _-� a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 9 DECEMBER 2003 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a special meeting on Tuesday, 9 December 2003, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; R. Farley, L. Kupferman, M. Kupersmith, G. Quimby, M. Boucher Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer, E. Farrell, On this evening, the Board secretary was taking minutes at a regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting, and the tape machine which was thought to be taping the DRB meeting malfunctioned. The minutes which follow represent only the warned agenda items and the action taken on them at this meeting. 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-38 of Homestead Design, Inc., for a planned unit development on a 44.78 acre parcel consisting of: 1) nine 3-unit multi -family dwellings, 2)14 four -unit multi -family dwellings, and 3) one 6-unit multi -family dwelling, 895 Dorset Street. Following discussion, Mr. Boucher moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-03-38 of Homestead Design, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 6-0. Continued sketch plan #SD-03-66 of Eric Farrell for a planned unit development on 25.77 acres consisting of: 1) 26 single family lots, 2) a 3.35 acre lot with an existing single family dwelling, 3) a 0.51 acre lot with an existing single family dwelling, and 4) three open space lots, 1302 and 1340 Spear Street: Discussion was held on this item. No action was taken. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 846-4107 FAX (802) 846-4101 CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER April 9, 2004 Dr. Michael Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Proposed Farrell Development Dear Mike: Thank you for your letter of December 15, 2003 and follow-up on April 1, 2004. I apologize for not responding in writing sooner, but I had sent the letter on to the Planning and Zoning Department for comment and failed to follow-up. Since my office has very limited authority in development review matters under Vermont State Statues, I usually do not get involved in zoning and land use discussions. In -fill developments are always the most difficult for City development agencies to review. The balance between the rights of property owners and the needs and vested rights of abutters is a difficult one to define and is always judged on a case -by -case basis. The City's role is to provide a fair and consistent review in accordance with previously adopted by-laws and to make sure that the public process is as open, transparent and participatory as possible. To the extent that the City can better, or more expeditiously involve neighbors and other effected parties, we will have done our job correctly. We do follow State Statutory requirements regarding notification and warning of meetings; perhaps we need to find a way to exceed those requirements without creating a situation where the City acquires new liability. (For example, state law requires that abutting neighbors be notified of projects at the time of first public review. Your letter suggests that notification be made when the City first receives the proposal. If we go to the early notification time, and miss a neighbor, we have created a new liability for which we can be held responsible. I do have some thoughts about how this can be accomplished, which I will describe later.) City planning authority, including the areas of review and responsibility of the Development Review Board (DRB), is authorized in Vermont under Title 24, Chapter 117 of the state code. The areas of permitted review are very closely defined. Vermont is not a "home rule" state; therefore local governments may only exercise the authority specifically granted them in state statute. Unfortunately, our Boards have no authority to insist that developments (except in limited specifically designated downtown areas) are visually pleasing or meet the approval of neighbors. The project does have to be compatible with adjacent development but generally a single-family residential I neighborhood, with similar densities to the adjacent development would be considered compatible. Exactly how much authority and power a government or community should have, and how much rights a private landowner vests, has been a subject of debate throughout the history of Vermont and the US. Vermont law often seems to favor the private landowner at the local level, but does achieve balance at the District Environmental Commission (Act 250) review level that does take some of your concerns into the review process. Many neighborhoods have used the Act 250 process to get their concerns, which cannot be regulated at the local level, addressed. Regarding the land trust, the City has worked with the development of the land trust and supports its efforts. The City also works independently to acquire open space for preservation. Over the years several significant parcels have been purchased and preserved, most notably the Calkin Farm on Dorset Street. Purchase of land does require a willing seller as well as a buyer. When developers begin to calculate the value of their property they often expect to get the same return from the City as they would from a private purchaser. Because the City will not develop the land, the portion of the purchase price that reflects development rights is lost to the City and often makes the cost unsupportable. For example, the City recently negotiated to buy a small 5-acre site on Kennedy Drive accessed at $8,000 per acre. The developer felt the land value, used as dense housing as permitted by zoning, was worth $600,000 for 5 acres. We could not agree to spend taxpayer's funds at that rate. The City would be interested in talking with any owner who wishes to sell a valuable piece of open space, it has not been my understanding that this is the case in this instance. I understand the concern about the right-of-way through to Spear Street. This through street has been shown for several years on the Official City Map and is included in the DRB sub -division approved plans for Vail Drive. There is a properly recorded easement to that effect in the City Clerk's office. The City believes it is good policy to connect neighborhoods when possible. That being said, I don't believe that we can expect all residents to be familiar with our land records or the Official Map. They may not be familiar with, or forget over time, the original approvals of their sub -division. I will make three suggestions to try to improve communications, to make sure that residents have greater opportunity to become aware of proposed developments that could impact them: I . I will ask the Planning Commission to study the land -use regulations to determine if it is feasible to require developers to post notice on their property to be developed as soon as a sketch plan is provided the City. Such a posting could be via a large sign that has a red capital Z that would alert people to the request to change the use of the property. The City can write the specifications as to location, size, and materials for such a sign. This would provide notification to the general public without putting a new private notification responsibility and liability on the City. 2. It is more difficult to post future right-of-ways because they may be vacant and unused for many, many years. However, if the City is going to include the presence of a future right-of-way in a development, it could require that the existence of the right-of-way is shown to any prospective buyer and have the proposed right-of-way listed in the deed for adjacent property that would allow future owners to access the same information. 3. The City web site includes a great deal of information that is helpful to the public, especially in the development area. The site, www.sburl.com, has an excellent Planning and Zoning section with interactive maps, forms and all our regulations. The Official Map is at http__//sburl_com/docs/Map_Official_Ddf I will write an article for the Other Paper communicating the availability of this information. All agendas and minutes are posted on our web site. Finally, I want to make sure you know that the new sketch plan for this development will be heard by the DRB on April 20, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. in City Hall. I hope this letter, although tardy, has been responsive. I have tried not to comment on the specifics of any particular proposal since that would not be appropriate. Please let me know if I can help you or your neighbors further in this, or any other, matter. Sincerely, Chuck Hafter� City Manager CC: Juli Beth Hoover, Director of Planning and Zoning Jim Condos, Chair, City Council City Council Members 214 Meadowood Drive S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 April 1,2004 Charles Hafter, City Manager 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dear Chuck, On Dec. 15, 2003 I sent you a letter regarding several generic issues that arose during DRB meetings regarding the proposed Farrell development off Spear St. In case you've misplaced or discarded it, I've enclosed another copy. I hope you are planning to provide us with a written response. You did give me a brief verbal response regarding the marking of future right- of ways, but not succinct enough that I could relate the info to others. The letter was written with the input and on behalf of the city residents on Meadowood Drive, Spear St., Pinnacle at Spear and Four Sisters Rd., and several of these people have asked about your response. Since the major theme of the letter was to explore ways to improve communication between the City's administration and residents, I think it would be very important for you to respond formally. You would not be expected to address issues specifically as they might bear on the Farrell development, but just in general terms. I know you have many projects on your plate, but I hope you can make time to respond, or if you see fit, to delegate that responsibility to others in your administration. Thanks for your time and efforts. Sincerely, Michael J. Scollins 214 Meadowood Drive S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dec. 15, 2003 Charles Hafter, City Manager 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, Vt. 05403 Dear Chuck, I've become quite involved as a spokesperson for many neighbors regarding the proposed Farrell development off Spear St. I want to share with you several of my related experiences, some rewarding, and some very frustrating, and some suggestions for process improvement. The Development Review Board chaired by John Dinklage provides an excellent forum for citizen input, and the Board goes out of its way to hear and address everyone's concerns. The members are well- informed, thoughtful, and dedicated. It is disillusioning to learn that the DRB has very limited discretion in assessing the merits of proposals. The first two sketch plans submitted by the Farrells were frankly offensive to the neighbors, and in the judgment of many, to the Board and City as well. That the Board has no authority to weigh esthetics in its deliberations is a flagrant flaw in the system. A fifth grade student could do the math to determine conformity with setbacks and housing density —the Board should be empowered to insist that the development be visually pleasing and compatible with adjacent houses, and not stand as a permanent monument to greed and poor taste. As you know, the abutters of this putative development have expressed a strong interest in attempting to raise the money to purchase this land, in conjunction with UVM. The newly -formed S. Burlington Land Trust has enthusiastically supported this idea, and their involvement in such a project could greatly raise their visibility in the consciousness of City residents. UVM (through Ian DeGroot ,VP for Community Development) has expressed a keen desire to sit down with the interested parties to see if such an acquisition could be worked out. They are very interested in possibly consolidating some of their farming operations in that area. This outcome would seem to reward everybody. Unfortunately, such a transaction apparently does not appear lucrative enough to the Farrells; they haven't had the courtesy to even respond to our inquiry. This situation highlights several procedural steps that beg for revision. The abutters, with few exceptions, first learned of the proposed development when the developer sent us a sketch plan and invited us to an informational session. At that point we reacted very quickly in mobilizing the neighbors, the Land Trust and UVM- but it was very likely already too late. Unless the DRB determines that the development's impact on Spear St. traffic would be unacceptable (at the proposed housing density it would be, in our judgment), and that it must be delayed until/unless access can be secured through the Isham property onto Meadowood Drive, then all our efforts will have been futile. All the abutting neighbors should have been notified in writing by the city, when the development proposal was first submitted to the City. If the Land Trust is to have real impact in the City, then it should ideally be given the right to negotiate for select properties before the owner can apply for development. More than one person has related to me a perceived indifference by the City administration toward the Land Trust's interest in the Farrell land. I would like to ask (seriously, not rhetorically) whether the City is more interested in preserving select land tracts, or in building more houses and expanding its tax base. We would not expect the Trust to contribute financially to this project -only to lend their knowledge, enthusiasm and tax-exempt status. Finally, the comments of several concerned and thoughtful Vail Drive residents made clear that promulgation of the right-of-way at the north end of their street was de facto woefully inadequate. Similarly, I and many Meadowood Drive residents who often walk there regarded the curb cut at the far (northern) side of the cul-de-sac as an indicator that the development would forever terminate there. The Board's admonition that we "should have known" was not persuasive. If Vail Drive should become a through street to Spear St., its residents will rightfully feel betrayed, and the City might have difficulty defending against a legal challenge. I have a suggestion to avoid such problems in the future: all existing and future developments which contain such right -of —ways should have laminated sketch plans posted at the appropriate locations, so that all interested neighbors and potential buyers will be properly informed. The minimal cost should be borne by the developers. The involvement of Lou Bresee and his Recreation Committee was greatly appreciated. They did secure a recreation easement along the eastern boundary of the land, where the neighbors requested it. Unfortunately this may prove to be a hollow victory, since in the present plan a road courses along the western side of the path, and the views of the Adirondacks will be all but eliminated by the closely -packed houses. Most of the abutting neighbors (including Gary Farrell) purchased their homes at a time when this land was zoned for only two houses. When the zoning was changed, we were confident that the Zoning Board (and now the DRB) would exercise due discretion in reviewing any proposal to develop this field, and ensure that any such project be in harmony with the adjacent properties. That the Board has no such power undermines their qualifications and integrity, and betrays the neighbors. Should this proposal proceed, an entire neighborhood of long-standing City residents and taxpayers will have had their properties devalued, all for the gain of a single family. On behalf of many families on Meadowood Drive, Spear Street, Pinnacle Drive and Vail Drive, I urge you to review these suggestions with the appropriate City officers and committees. We realize that it is difficult to balance the needs for development and for land preservation, and very much appreciate your time and consideration. We hope you and your family have a happy holiday season! Sincerely, Michael J. Scollins CC: John Dinklage, DRB Chair Lou Bresee, Recreation Crate Chair Sarah Dopp, Land Trust interim Chair Rick Whittlesey, atty Neighbors February 17, 2004 Ms Linda Seavy Campus Planning University of Vermont 109 South Prospect Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 Subject: Potential Easement at Corner of Swift and Spear Streets Dear Ms. Seavy Enclosed are a map and an aerial photograph of the UVM property located on the southeast corner of Swift and Spear Streets in South Burlington. As you are aware the Farrell property adjacent to the south border of the UVM property may be developed. One of the development configurations shown to the South Burlington Development Review Board proposes a recreation path along the east boundary of that property. If this is approved it would be very desirable to have that path continue north along the east boundary of the UVM property to Swift Street. This letter is not a request for such an easement but a response to your request for a detailed description of the easement that we have discussed on two recent occasions. Should the Farrell development be approved with a recreation path in the described location I would expect that more official discussions of this idea would be initiated. A typical recreation path easement is 20 ft. wide with the intention of constructing a 10 ft. paved path. I hope that the enclosed material meets your needs. If you have any further questions please contact me at your convenience. Yours truly, Louis B. Bresee Chairman South Burlington Recreation Path Committee 658-0597 No Text TANGLEw6c C 3 n: EL =.'> T GEDAq 42 7 ` �— ^�°3 zikw I MOT t 4V AND FARM RD. 0 . it s >*J Bff)WN cn 5 s $ T yy TELY �v _ t. U I U D S i R ` C IBJ �l.. � #`,r. - � a�• . a ,'.'�r' ' �'.; 96 - � 74,,E 4 •.t i « N Y/• i : J `A �' V!.' �( f /Y i', F •Van / s i i j� �p.� "�` �. ( •�' .fr /j!; `',;. �� r 'Av a/ ' it'F" I ! b '+ r. � +G' f` ; -•+� Y } }'7r [Al a- E}^ •-"--�1-R SITE ENGINEER: iFth. N1 ors 4,�' P•) yy ` W . } A R+. P� (fi Xis "7fC" r.�,A (. .n •} T t r, -.� r�SeM: ^ — PJM . !!�� �Y • r - � SAV E E. r APP.M SAV Y - OWNER: FARRELL FARRELL LOT SUBDIVISION ti t .. SPEAR STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON �� �i,., ft e a� �a �.� ..� � r , R •y�� /•�R�"^ .mow ,r `rr � 'd jA Aix ' • ...y. r . :. T. f I' ) l '•' 1.Y ' y n _ .r K - ` i; v s2'y, 5. �.' ♦ . r ` ; �.. a Thpg ty is II es aorena arrox survem to t and were drawn from the South t C i Burlington tax maps. ,��'.! !'i ' i • ' - 7 ,y., i' r LATE. "I'M XEn m:vlslax 40. l� io ' . r e • r ,3ie ` s o'.: _ _ � ,.• •�� � !. Y-1. n � "f �'� i ER r _ ,,.L11>� +�'`� PLAN ,*_ s ft �r r', ... . if 4 �\ ,�_ S ` '•A PATE LP 1nINt: NlIN115R APR., 2003 M ,, r'• C2 : • 1 �"� N.T.S. yN. r* � � ,a 02250 r l -JBO 1 t , r - - -t - - - - - - - i I LOT s L LQT a III LOT 7 III Lora I ; I Lora i .34 ACRES I I .38 ACRES I \ \ • \ LOT 3 1 �� LOT 4 .34 ACRES .3a ACRES .3s ACRES I I .34 ACRES"-' -`• ACRES I I I I I to 1 1� i I i I I (�. I L .38 ACRES L \�•. \ I I I I I I i I L J- -- J - , _1--- I \\ \ �\\� _.. C)VU •_ -- - - ._- __... ROPOSED W R(A'1LOT I I 39 ACRES . I LOT 23 LOIf 24 III .3ACRES I I I LOT 22 I I I LOT 21 i .• R.37 ACRES I I .38 ACRES .38 A ES LOT 25 F ^ LOT 28 I I I .42 ACRES I I \ J I L - -- -- .__ -J I L - - ._ �__ --I 1 ' r / �• .50 ACRESdaRow HOA ` HOA LOT 3 r`-=_'' ^ • 'r +. ri-i-ai /00,"�-__-�� MNVGeiWRFAM 01M1 ccs /39O / r GRAP6 SCALE r r \ ( sa recl') r ' t hfh= so rL r v P.M., k"'00-Mm"amm. l I LOT 12 .35 ACRES �WI I I I I LOT 11 I i( LOT 10 / L- - - _ - - J I .33 ACRES I i 1.32 ACRES / . l - -- _ - I l_ __ _ / I LOT 13 . .31 .31 ACRES POMirk STORM WATER I LOT 14 I AU4A[,O,Bn ARfA � •��r�f ii'S .31 ACRES _ . . . -. - r�: .7 ACRES .. • Q . ~r�iii'yii •� I \ LOT 20 L43 ACRES \\\MM� I i LOT 19 /� /` •\ P I .51 ACRES/ / / LOT �. .51 A. . PROPOSED UIMNG ARCHITECTURAL AREA NGHRNG: Town Cornmom Full -Cutoff Fi dure w/ Seml-Decorative pole LOT SCHEDULE TOTAL PROUECTAREA. 26.77 ACRES X 1.2IR815 /ACRE = MAX. DEW 30 UNITS HOA LOT 1: 2.74 ACRES LOT 9: 0.38 ACRES LOT 20: 0.43 ACRES HOA LOT 2: 2.41 ACRES LOT 10: 0.32 ACRES LOT 21: 0.38 ACRES HOA LOT 3: 0.36 ACRES LOT 11: 0.33 ACRES LOT 22: 0.37 ACRES ROW AREA: 4.49 ACRES LOT 12: 0.35 ACRES LOT 23: 0.35 ACRES LOT 1: 0.39ACRES LOT 13: 0.31 ACRES LOT 24: 0.38 ACRES LOT 2: 0.56 ACRES LOT 14: 0.31 ACRES LOT 25: 0.42 ACRES LOT 3: 0.38 ACRES LOT 15: 0.38 ACRES LOT 26: 0.50 ACRES LOT 4: 0.35 ACRES LOT 16: 0.58 ACRES LOT 27: 4.19 ACRES LOT 5: 0.34 ACRES LOT 17: 0.81 ACRES LOT 28: 0.51 ACRES LOT 6: 0.34 ACRES LOT 18: 0.61 ACRES LOT 29: 0.36 ACRES LOT 7: 0.34 ACRES LOT 19: 0.51 ACRES LOT 30: 0.32 ACRES LOT 8: 0.34 ACRES LEGEND \ Protect Boundary Proposed Center the J9p ETdstin0 Property Lines \ Proposed Curdng DOW TOpogrophy I Proposed 8ihminouso Paving s \ ��\Proposed Property Ilr South Burlington Overlay District 4 ROpowd Public ROW Southeast (Xladront Restricted Area \ &Aft Set Back Lkm . Proposed Light FA - Wetland Buller Proposed Shade Tree Proposed Fence ) Proposed Evergreen Two \ Proposed Recreollond Path Wetland LOCATION MAP * SCALE V - 2"' PO Box 1335 landscape architects • planning consultants q)b IM228, 2003 I FARRELL - SPEAR STREET Burlington, VT 05402 301collegestreet.budington•vermont.06401 902•658.3555 htlpaAw-Woy*- _ [ 1-=ea I SKETCH PLAN urrowr_x.. I i ---- L -------,� ---1 f-'--'`-1 r I LOT LOT 3 ` LOT 4. I I I LOTS I ACR�B I I 33.O.CRES \ \\� `\ .38 ACRES ,1 1 .32 ACRES I (.I .33 ACRES I ( I cRe ' �' I \ \`\\ , III IIt I'I i ILOTIII III III III .56 ACRES J `�..�y 1 _ J i �- -- --_ --_ ._ z\ ------�--------�--- -----T----............. -------- r- --_- - I r LOT 10 I I I LOT 11 I i LOT 12 1 r LOT 13 I / -- - LOT 0 I ' .32 ACRES I I .31 ACRES l i t .30 A�CRE3 i I .33 ACRES 11 I •33 ACRES I I .33 ACRES I I _ _ ,( I (I 'I' � / II - J _ 1 \� /� ,` �---- -- --�-- -- --- - --- - ---PROPMeaROW - -- �••� \�'�\ / LOT 1 - -- ---- I Ir I I .39 ACRES ` / "' I I- - - -I I 1 I � IIII/ I I 1 L / / / III I ' I L07 24 I I I .3LOT ACRES 23 I LOT 22 I I I LOT 21 LOT 25 I I I .38 A RES ' I ' I .37 ACRES I I .38 ACRES 1 i LOT 28 .42 ACRES I ' I I- -_ _ _l I L - - -_ - -1 I L .50 ACRES J �NDgp A - L _ - - - J --- - _ 1 HOA LOT-2- HOA LOT 3 `- 0.36 AQM-_. 4-------------------------------- SIIXM WARR /-_ _✓ 1 MMIAIaOABQAAFA inRl4 T GRAPbIC SCALE w I o r I I ( IN FEET) I t��n-eo tc I 1 I I 1 1 \ \ 1 • \ `POTPr:nusraaawATutw AREA i I I LOT 14 .51 ACRES" r' + . • Q H• + Ab LOT-0 / �'� % , II LOT 20 443 ACRES \ \ \POTId X STOIN WAtei, j " \ KMAGU.B(fAAFAy/{' /> I LOT 19 ,F)/iir/ .51 ACREBii i�ri��',�{(��,� PROPOSED LIGHTING ARCHITECTURAL AREA W ONG: Town Commons Full -Cutoff Fbdure w/ Sern Decomftm Pole LOT SCHEDULE TOTAL PROJECTAREA: 25.77 ACRES X 1.2 UNITS / ACRE = MAX. DENSITY 30 UNITS HOA LOT 1: 2.74 ACRES HOA LOT 2: 2.41 ACRES HOA LOT 3: 0.36 ACRES ROW AREA: 4.49 ACRES LOT 1: 0.39 ACRES LOT 2: 0.56 ACRES LOT 3: 0.38 ACRES LOT 4: 0.32 ACRES LOT 5: 0.33 ACRES LOT 6: 0.33 ACRES LOT 7: 0.33 ACRES LOT 8: 0.33 ACRES LEGEND \ DIY \_390 \ EAft Property floes Emmg Topography \ ` Proposed Properly Lines \ Proposed Public ROW v Building Set Back Lines Welland Buffer Proposed Fence \ Proposed Recreational Path LOT 9: 0.33 ACRES LOT 10: 0.33 ACRES LOT 11: 0.32 ACRES LOT 12: 0.31 ACRES LOT 13: 0.30 ACRES LOT 14: 0.51 ACRES LOT 15: 0.38 ACRES LOT 16: 0.58 ACRES LOT 17: 0.81 ACRES LOT 18: 0.51 ACRES LOT 19: 0.51 ACRES LOT 20: 0.43 ACRES LOT 21: 0.38 ACRES LOT 22: 0.37 ACRES LOT 23: 0.35 ACRES LOT 24: 0.38 ACRES LOT 25: 0.42 ACRES LOT 26: 0.50 ACRES LOT 27: 4.19 ACRES LOT 28: 0.51 ACRES LOT 29: 0.36 ACRES LOT 30: 0.32 ACRES \ Proposed Center the \ Proposed Curbing ® Proposed M"InousPaNng aSouth Burlington Overlay DlsMct ® Southeast Quadrant Restricted Area Proposed Light FlI tProposed Shade Tree Proposed Evergreen Tree -j Weiland LOCATION MAP A scALE V = 2000' I _T. J. Boyle Applicant: Er c Farrell ape architects. planning consultants mjb Ma 28,2003 " Atltl n«u»m P.,�swa zs, as,aao-mp timmw PO Box 1335 � ,,,,, �,,,� FARRELL-SPEAR STREET 2evirn.ea .econa aJa.wee-mP 11o4M Burlington, VT 05402 Cu..301street. burlington• verrnont. 05401 802.858.3555 http-//ww.Ooyle.aom 1'=60' SKETCH PLAN - ALTERNATIVE §§)§kk)§ ))kk 2 <« z - q666. e. ±±%&mma&&® 3 £ §§§§§§§§§( k / a # § ( g;;§§§E■§; k /Alid �l m E Wu " %2-2mg6Rgq § 66f9222m22 ( §§§eli k§\§/§§ ! 2 ! 7 2 ; . Pro] . ,....■ ■.. ��._�__� , . __ w.PIgn-dwq . : _U---_8__PM� No Text J _I J J J J J -..✓ � •�-'� "� J J .it.,��y1.;�7JJ J ..I J-.1f' J -------1`T1 - 5 I -34LATCERBES- LOT 7 LOT 8_L LOT 9 •38 ACRE LOT 3 LOT 4 .38 CRES •35 ACRES 34 ACRES II;I -34 ACR I I "SLOT :. - t iI ; I I LOT 2 \ \ \ ��_ I;I I I I I III Ij1- IiI J �, l .56 ACRES \, �+s /' �_ - J -� - _ _ - J I L - \ • - - � PROPOSED 60 RaN- \ \ i .39 ACRES LOT/ 24 LOT 23 I I I OT .35 ACRES I L22 I I I I I LOT 21 I I I I/ �'vP%1lt LOT 26 .38ARE8 LOT I i I I, I i L _ .37 ACRES �- - J L-- I I .38 ACRES � I OCN PAnr / b0, _ _ e RaW .50 ACRES .42 ACRES - J I L - •� �- i' _� -�i i E R F ±�N NORiHERNRo Ca`1NEr I • d. -- J I �- I ... -- - _ -V'+ _ _ _ _ _ =�"�._ - _ J t HOA LOT 3 I0.63 ACRES I '• HOA L T���=-� _�'--�� _-��-_•--o �: -. •-. I -. -. --� .�-�'� • "'ra' • �� Ni •� WEiLA?------------------------ ------ / PO NTIAL STORM WATERI^" AGEMENTAREA 3g0 Sp I � I I 1 GRAPHIC SCALE I ( OT FEET ) 1 inch = 60 tL I I 1 .�lltwe=6I=s0MI r LOT 12 .35 ACRES I ' LOT 11 1.33 ACRES I r-- - - - l L � I LOT13 - - - 1 L--- .31 ACRES - - JJJJJJJ r LOT 10 1.32 ACRES // I r------- y'.' \ POiENRAL STORM WATER LOT14 I MANAGEMENT AREA .31ACRES . .�.` ` ©.2 7 /1CRES . hit oNDU w O • `. �. \ Ap t .' POTENTULL STORM WATER X \ �\\ MANAGEMENT AREA \\` _ `I LOT \ 1 t I .38 ACRES LOT 20 1.35ACRES / / LOT 19 / ' / I \ `� \ LOT 16 .38 ACRES / I / I I I \ \ \ .58 ACRES LOT18 I \ \ 1 AS ACRES I I LOT '1-1 \ \ \ \ I _J / / / I ' .88 ACRES \ \ \ \� \ 1 PROPOSED LIGHTING ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING: Town Commons Full -Cutoff Fixture w/ Semi -Decorative Pole TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 24.98 ACRES LOT 7: 0.34 ACRES HOA LOT 1: 2.74 ACRES LOT 8: 0.34 ACRES HOA LOT 2: 2.41 ACRES LOT 9: 0.38 ACRES HOA LOT 3: 0.63 ACRES LOT 10: 0.32 ACRES ROW AREA: 4.49 ACRES LOT 11: 0.33 ACRES LOT 1: 0.39 ACRES LOT 12: 0.35 ACRES LOT 2: 0.56 ACRES LOT 13: 0.31 ACRES LOT 3: 0.38 ACRES LOT 14: 0.31 ACRES LOT 4: 0.35 ACRES LOT 15: 0.38 ACRES LOT 5: 0.34 ACRES LOT 16: 0.58 ACRES LOT 6: 0.34 ACRES LOT 17: 0.88 ACRES 1% LEGEND Project Boundary �3ga Existing Property Lines Existing Topography \ \ Proposed Property lines Proposed Public ROW \ Building Set Back Lines Wetland Butler Proposed Fence RECEIV-t) SEP 0 88,, 003 ',, City of So,,. udinqt&ij i J LOT 18: 0.48 ACRES LOT 19: 0.38 ACRES LOT 20: 0.35 ACRES LOT 21: 0.38 ACRES LOT 22: 0.37 ACRES LOT 23: 0.35 ACRES LOT 24: 0.38 ACRES LOT 25: 0.42 ACRES LOT 26: 0.50 ACRES LOT 27: 4.19 ACRES \ Proposed Center line \ Proposed Curbing \� Proposed Recreational Path ® Proposed Bituminous Paving ® South Burlington Overlay Districi Proposed Light Fixture OProposed Shade Tree Proposed Evergreen Tree El Wetland LOCATION MAP SCALE I^ = 2000' r^ i0s Applicant: Eric Farrell landscape architects • planning consultants mjb Ma�28, 2003 FARRELL - SPEAR STREET PO Box 1335 z ) Burlington, VT 05402 301 college street •Burlington • vemant • 05401 eoz.ssa.35ss hop://www.tjhoye.wn � a i• = so SKETCH PLAN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 4, 2003 \drb\sub\farrell\sketch.doc Application received: September 8, 2003 FARRELL — 27 LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-66 Meeting Date: December 9, 2003 Applicants/Owners Owners Eric Farrell Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell, et al. PO Box 1335 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05402 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information T.J. Boyle Associates Tax Parcel 1050-66000-R 301 College Street SEQ District Burlington, VT 05401 ± 25 Acres Location Map N Y w a. ;u i i 9 a "� Mdad +gp# r m r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch.doc Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a proposal to subdivide a 25.77 acre lot into 27 residential lots: one (1) lot measuring 3.35 acres; twenty-six (26) lots measuring between 0.40 acres and 0.81 acres; and three (3) open space lots. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ) off of Spear Street. The Development Review Board reviewed the initial sketch plans for the proposed project at the meeting on November 4, 2003 (minutes attached), but continued the application until December 9, 2003. Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans submitted on September 8, 2003 and has the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Zoning District Required 11 Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 ft. 17,424 ft. (Lots # 4&5) Max. Density 1.2 units/acre 1.05 units/acre Max. Building Coverage 15% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 30% n/a Min. Front Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. Max. Building Height 40 ft. <40 ft. �l zoning compliance Master Plan Approval: Pursuant to Section 15.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant requires a master Plan approval. The proposed project does involve the development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant. While the proposed project is close to the maximum density allowed for the subject property, it is short of its maximum density by three (3) units. Thus, the applicant will be required to submit a Master Plan application with the Preliminary Plat application. 1. The preliminary plat plan should include the acreage of the "development area'; as shown on the City's Southeast Quadrant Map. Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park Scenic View CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch doc Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. 2. The plans should be revised to include information, on a lot by lot basis, on the maximum height limit for each lot, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. 3. The legend of the plans should be revised to replace the phrase "South Burlington Overlay District" with the phrase "Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Zone D. " SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Jay Nadeau, Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department, the City does not have sufficient water storage for any new project requiring more than 1,000 GPD in this service area. 4. Occupancy of this project shall not take place until additional water storage is built in the City that would supply this high-pressure zone. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 5. Prior to final approval, the City Engineer shall certify that available sewer capacity is sufficient to serve the proposed subdivision. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sublfarrell\sketch.doc 6. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 28' to 30' wide public street in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, a collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 30' and a minimum right-of-way width of 60'. The proposed public street connecting the proposed collector street to the cul-de-sac in the southwest portion of the property will be a local public street. This street has a 50' wide right-of-way and a 28' pavement width, which is in compliance with Table 15- 1 of the Land Development Regulations. The pavement width of the proposed cul-de-sac is not in compliance with Figure 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, which requires a pavement width of 24'. The proposed roadways that cross the wetlands on the property have a pavement width reduced to 24'. Staff encourages this reduction in pavement width as it will reduce the associated impacts on the wetlands. However, the Director of Public Works will have to review and provide comments regarding the reduction in pavement width prior to final approval. 6. The plans should be revised to depict a roadway with a pavement width of 30, prior to the next plan submittal. 7. The plans shall be revised to depict the proposed cul-de-sac with a pavement width of 24 ; prior to the next plan submittal. 8. The Director of Public Works shall review and submit comments regarding the reduction in roadway pavement widths at wetland crossings to 24', prior to the next plan submittal. Circulation throughout the proposed development appears to be sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 6th Edition, 27 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 27.27 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic. This development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. Staff does not feel the proposed development will require any traffic management strategies. However, the City is currently undergoing a traffic study for the entire Spear Street corridor. The applicant should be prepared to comply with any of the study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. 9. The applicant should comply with any of the Spear Street corridor study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrel I\sketch. doc no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadway will cross the wetlands on the northern side of the property. 10. The applicant shall obtain advisory comments from the Natural Resource Committee to construct the proposed roadway over the existing wetland, prior to final approval. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staff's opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard very well for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to fall. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief has reviewed and approved the plans. 11. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department, as outlined in the letter From Chief Douglas Brent, dated October 31, 2003 (attached). Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, a 10' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property to the property to the north. This path ends at the proposed sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street. However, there is a proposed 60' wide right-of-way that could facilitate the extension of the 10' recreation path the northerly property boundary in the future. The Recreation Path Committee reviewed the plans at its meeting on December 1, 2003. They approved the proposed recreation path along the easterly boundary of the project discussed above. In their letter dated December 2, 2003 (attached), they request that the proposed sidewalk CITY OF SOUTH BURLh vGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street be replaced with a 10' wide recreation path, which is consistent with the Official City Map. 12. The plans shall be revised to replace the sidewalk running along the northerly side of the proposed street connecting the development to Spear Street with a 10' wide recreation path, prior to submittal of the next plans. 13. The City Engineer shall review the stormwater facilities and utilities plans, prior to final approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 14. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new electric, telephone, outdoor lighting, and cable distribution systems shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. Also, the Regulations state the applicant shall submit a landscaping phasing plan with the subdivision application. 15. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping plan with the next plan submittal. 16. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping budget, prepared by a landscape architect or a professional landscape designer, with the next plan submittal. 17. The plans shall be reviewed by the City Arborist, prior to final approval Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. This plan has been revised to come into compliance with this requirement. CITY OF SOUTH BURL,, jTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrel I\sketch. doc SEQ Restricted Area Lots #1-3 and #27 of the subject property fall within a Southeast Quadrant "restricted area". Currently, single-family dwellings exist on Lots #1 and #27. However, Lots # 2 and #3 are undeveloped. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board may allow development activities to occur in the "restricted areas" provided the Development Review Board determines that such development activities are consistent with the intent and purpose of the Southeast Quadrant, which is outlined in Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations. 18. Pursuant to Section 9.08(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Development Review Board to develop in the "restricted area" of the subject property, prior to final approval. 19. The plans shall be revised to depict the "restricted area" running through the subject property, as shown on the City of South Burlington Southeast Quadrant Official Zoning Map, prior to submittal of the next plans. Other 20. The preliminary plans shall be revised to incorporate the requirements of the City Engineer, as outlined in his Comments dated October 9, 2003 (attached). 21. The preliminary plat plans should include proposed street names. 22. The preliminary plat plans shall include street address in accordance with E-911 addressing standards. 23. Pursuant to Section 15.18(B)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, the preliminary plat submittal shall include an open space management plan. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 NOVEMBER 2003 seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Sketch Plan Application #SD-03-66 of Eric Farrell for a planned unit development on 24.98 acres consisting of. 1) 26 single family lots, 2) a 4.19 acre lot with an existing single family dwelling, and three open space lots, 1340 Spear Street: Mr. Farrell said the property involves 3 parcels of land on the east side of Spear St. South of Swift Street. Allowable density is 1.2 per acre. They will assemble the 3 lots into one PUD. 31 units would be allowed. They are proposing 30 including the 2 existing homes. Mr. Farrell showed a wetland piece in the middle of the property. He indicated they will respect the 50 ft. setback from the wetland. Mr. Farrell noted that neighbors would prefer this to be a dead ended development. Mr. Belair said staff does not recommend that as there is a plan for a connection to the adjacent property. Mr. Farrell suggested a dead end with provision for an emergency access. Several lots were noted that are square in design. Ms. Hoover said that in general, people find lots more appealing when they are deeper than wide., She noted that most progressive zoning regulations prohibit square lots. Mr. Dinklage asked about the rec path. Mr. Farrell said the path will run from the cul de sac at the end of Pinnacle Drive to Spear Street. There is also a 60 ft. corridor to connect to UVM property in the future. Mr. Farrell said they will eliminate the curb cut to the Hager house which would then be accessed from the new road. Mr. Dinklage asked about the curb cut to Gary Farrell's house. Mr. Farrell said his brother wants to leave that as is. Mr. Farrell said they have an easement that will allow them to connect to the sewer line. There will be street trees on both sides of the street as well as attractive street lighting. They will do a traffic analysis, if required, but they don't anticipate this will be a big traffic generator. The major road will be a public street. Mr. Dinklage cited a letter received from the Scollins family regarding a 20 ft. recreation easement shown near Vale Drive (behind proposed houses). They Scollinses are asking to extend that along their eastern boundary line. Mr. Farrell said they will look at that, but it appears to be a path that goes nowhere. Mr. Bolton felt that with the exception of the square lots, the plans seem to have good proportions. -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 NOVEMBER 2003 Mr. Kupferman questioned adding 2 lots to the restricted area along Spear St. He also wanted both driveways on Spear St. to be closed. Ms. Quimby wanted to see the connection to Vale Drive. She also questioned the Fire Chief s comments and whether they applied to the old or new plan. Mr. Belair said the Chief reviewed the old plan. Members felt he should see the new plan. Mr. Boucher said there should be a physical barrier behind lots 21-26 so that homeowners don't use the wetland for a yard. Mr Farrell said he will do that. Mr. Boucher also wanted to close both curb cuts. He also felt the plan could be reconfigured to eliminate the lots in the restricted area. Mr. Cimonetti spoke of the difficulty of getting out of his driveway across the street from this project. He felt this project is a burden Spear St. can't absorb. He noted that the official city map presumed that additional development in this area would have a parallel street that would come into Swift St. independently. Mr Cimonetti said he would like the principal street to be on the eastern side of the property and connection. Ms. Skiff said they subdivided their property into 3 lots so there would be the least impact on neighbors. She said they understood that the aim of the Southeast Quadrant zone was to keep as much open land as possible. She felt that now there are smaller and smaller lots and asked why these parcel have to be cut up so small. Ms. Skiff said they also have a problem getting out of their Swift St. property and she felt it did not make sense to add a curb cut there. Dr. Kleh, a resident of Meadowood Drive, said he was not in favor of how this development is planned and most abutters agree with him. He felt that 2 roads across the wetland will destroy the wetland. He also did not favor tiny lots. Mr. Warshaw of Pinnacle at Spear said when Pinnacle was developed, theirs was the 6th house into the development. Now there are 81 units. Water pressure has diminished and this concerned him. He felt they are "right on the edge" for fire protection. Ms. Hoover said the city has bonded for a water tank to deal with this issue and the problem should be fixed by next year. Mr. Warshaw also felt the city needs to address the stormwater runoff issue. Mr. Dinklage agreed and said the city is working on a "stormwater utility" to address the problem. Mr. Young, a Spear St. resident questioned the use of the sewer and noted that existing residents bore the cost of that. He wanted residents of these homes to pay their share. He also noted the continuing addition of telecommunication wires which are compromising the views in the area. Mr. Dinklage suggested bringing this issue to the City Council -4- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 NOVEMBER 2003 Mr. Wulfson agreed with other people's concerns. He felt a cul de sac would alleviate some of the traffic. He also asked that the developer keep as close to the existing grade as possible. Ms. Denha noted that she has lived on Spear St. For 45 years and has witnessed the loss of all the surrounding land. Mr. Warshaw noted that one condition for Pinnacle was landscaping. It was put in, but the developer raised the grade which eliminated the impact of the landscaping. Mr. Dinklage asked Mr. Farrell if he anticipated grade changes. Mr. Farrell didn't know. He said the area is fairly flat. Mr. Meunier asked if the developer will build the houses and whether they would be of similar value. Mr.Farrell said it would be their intention to develop the infrastructure and get permits. He didn't feel they would build. He already has people interested in individual lots, but he would not sell to a developer, only to individuals. Ms. Muir, a Spear St. resident, favors the project. Mr. Skiff said residents haven't had a chance to get together adequate resources to get information. He asked the board to continue the sketch plan process so neighbors can pursue some complicated issues. Mr. Dinklage reviewed the Board's issues: a. 2 lots in the restricted area (a majority of members oppose this) b. extension of recreation easement along east side of property (Mr. Dinklage felt the rec path committee should look at this) c. traffic (Mr. Dinklage suggested technical review for traffic, but Mr. Belair noted there is an ongoing Spear St. Study that may take this development into account). d. dead -ending the street (members opposed this) e. relocation of driveway to G. Farrell house. Mr. Farrell said his wife doesn't want it moved. Mr. Dinklage said that adding G. Farrell's property to the development increases the density, so he didn't feel it was unreasonable to ask that the driveway be relocated. Eric Farrell indicated he was willing to compromise re: the curb cut. Ms. Quimby then moved to continue the sketch plan hearing until 9 December. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -5- F&M DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 802-863-4541 fax 802-865-1253 Memo To: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner City of South Burlington From: Eric Farrell Date: 12/3/03 Re: Spear Street Project After presenting our Sketch Plan to the Development Review Board on November 4, 2003 and recording comments from Board members, neighbors and the general public, we met with our design team to consider appropriate modifications to the plan. We presented a revised plan to the Recreation Path Committee on December 1, 2003 and collected their comments and recommendations, which we will incorporate into a further revised plan to be presented at the second Sketch Plan meeting before the Development Review Board on December 9, 2003. A copy of the revised plan, as presented to the Recreation Path Committee on December 1, 2003, is attached for your review. The further revised plan will not be available until just before the December 9th meeting. I will provide you with a copy of that plan as soon as it's available, however that may not be until the meeting. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at my office at 658-7400 ext. 25 or 343-7055 (cell). You may also contact my associate Liz Dilley at 658-7400 ext. 14. Enclosure P QQaQQQQ�QQQ 000ddooddoi � � � m �u�'� $ sss000000s :9 a U �\` a • Z 0000000000 U U U U U V U i o< J LU I' I I U i I I I I I I I I I I , 3 1 1 � If la , k, ii��\1lF:IS r II da �� I �a I I � � � 7 �F v Ea D� O N 214 Meadowood Dr. S.Burlington, Vt. 05403 Nov. 30, 2003 Ian DeGroot, VP for Development UVM Burlington, Vt. 05401 Dear Mr. DeGroot: While I happen to be a part-time faculty member at the Medical School, I am writing as the representative of a group, all of whom reside adjacent to a S.Burlington land parcel that has been leased and farmed by UVM for many years. The parcel is about 20 acres in size, has been owned by the Farrell family, and is abutted to the north by a land parcel owned by UVM, occupying the southeast corner of the Swift St. -Spear St. intersection. Mr. Farrell has proposed to develop his land, and would like to place about 30 single family units, each on about 1/3`d acre, with access via Spear St. The neighbors strongly oppose this project for many reasons (see attached copy of October 28, 2003 letter to the Development Review Board) and have suggested instead a land trust transaction that would preserve the land in perpetuity. Mr. Farrell has not yet responded to the suggestion (see attached copy of Nov. 9, 2003 letter to him). The logical recipient of this land would seem to be UVM. The University would then be able to continue to farm (and/or hay) the land, the many residents in the expanding surrounding neighborhoods could continue to enjoy it for recreational use, and the City of S.Burlington would have preserved a gateway tract in its ever -threatened Southeast Quadrant. S.Burlington now has a nascent Land Trust, which strongly supports this idea, but of course at this point has no money, and is just in the process of finalizing its by-laws. This would be a wonderful initial project for their participation as well; it would enhance their visibility in the City, and set an exciting precedent for subsequent opportunities. For this project to succeed, of course, we would require UVM's interest, and then we would need to find the money. Ideally UVM would be willing to contribute to the purchase, but much of the funding would come from neighbors, many of whom have already expressed a strong desire to donate. The Vermont State Land Trust would be another possible source, since they have expressed interest in just such "gateway tracts". We were given your name as the appropriate contact by Al Overton. If others at UVM should be involved, please feel free to forward this correspondence to them. If at all possible, it would be most helpful if we could hear from you, just regarding interest in the proposal, by Tuesday Dec.9, 2003. The D.R.B. meets again on that date, and we would very much like to convince them of our determination to save this land from development. We well appreciate that university deliberative processes may of necessity move slowly. Thanks very much for taking the time to review this material. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Michael J. Scollins 658-2330(h) 847-4714(w) Cc: Charles Hafter, S.Burlington City Manager John Dinklage, Chair, S.Burlington D.R.B. Sarah Dopp, interim Chair, S.Burlington Land Trust Gary and Jane Farrell, 350 Spear St. Atty. Richard Whittlesey CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 27, 2003 \drb\su b\fa rrelksketch. doc Application received: September 8, 2003 FARRELL — 27 LOT SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-03-66 Meeting Date: November 4, 2003 Applicants/Owners Owners Eric Farrell Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell, et al. PO Box 1335 1350 Spear Street Burlington, VT 05402 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information T.J. Boyle Associates Tax Parcel 1050-66000-R 301 College Street SEQ District Burlington, VT 05401 ± 25 Acres Location Ma CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \d rb\sub\fa rrell\sketch. doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Eric Farrell, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a proposal to subdivide a 24.98 acre lot into 27 residential lots: one (1) lot measuring 4.19 acres; twenty-six (26) lots measuring between 0.31 acres and 0.88 acres; and three (3) open space lots. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ) off of Spear Street. Associate Planner Brian Robertson, referred to herein as Staff, has reviewed the plans submitted on September 8, 2003 and has the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements SEQ Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 12,000 ft. 13,503 ft. (Lots #13&14) Max. Density 1.2 units/acre 1.08 units/acre �l Max. Building Coverage 15% unknown q Max. Overall Coverage 30% unknown Min. Front Setback 20 ft. 20 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. Max. Building Height 40 ft. <40 ft. zoning compliance Master Plan Approval: Pursuant to Section 15.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant requires a master Plan approval. The proposed project does involve the development of more than ten (10) dwelling units in the Southeast Quadrant. While the proposed project is close to the maximum density allowed for the subject property, it is short of its maximum density by two (2) units. Thus, the applicant will be required to submit a Master Plan application with the Preliminary Plat application. 1. The preliminaryplat plan should include the acreage of the "development area", as shown on the City's Southeast Quadrant Map. Dorset Park View Protection Zone D The southwest portion of the subject property falls within the Dorset Park View Protection Zone D. Any development on the lots that fall within the zone are subject to the following standards: CITY OF SOUTH BURLlivGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch.doc (a) No part of any structure within Zone D of the Dorset Park View Protection Zone shall exceed an elevation of 441 feet above sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said structure is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. (b) Landscaping and other vegetation located within Zone D of the Dorset Park View Protection Zone shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 441 feet above mean sea level minus 2.0 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the Dorset Park View Protection Zone West Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map, or 3 feet above any grade existing on the date of passage of these regulations, whichever height is higher. 2. The plans should be revised to clearly depict the boundary of the Dorset Park View Protection Zone D, prior to submittal of the next plans. The plans should also include information, on a lot by lot basis, on the maximum height limit for each lot. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Jay Nadeau, Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department, the City does not have sufficient water storage for any new project requiring more than 1,000 GPD in this service area. 3. Occupancy of this project shall not take place until additional water storage is built in the City that would supply this high-pressure zone. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 4. Prior to final approval, the City Engineer shall certify that available sewer capacity is sufficient to serve the proposed subdivision. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. i CITY OF SOUTH BURLi,4GTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this property is proposed via a 24' wide roadway in a 60' wide right-of-way off of Spear Street. As the proposed street will be connected to the neighborhood t the southeast of the subject property, it will be classified as a collector road. Pursuant to Table 15-1 of the Land Development Regulations, collector road shall have a minimum pavement width of 30' and a minimum right-of- way width of 60'. 6. The plans should be revised to depict a roadway with a pavement width of 30 , prior to the next plan submittal. Circulation throughout the proposed development appears to be sufficient. The proposed roadway connects to the neighborhood to the southeast of the subject property to promote connectivity. In addition, a 60' wide right-of-way is proposed to the property to the north of the subject property to facilitate a future connection. According to the ITE, 6th Edition, 27 single-family dwellings are estimated to add 27.27 P.M. peak hour trip ends to adjacent street traffic. This development is off of Spear Street, so it is important that the additional traffic created by it is managed properly. Staff does not feel the proposed development will require any traffic management strategies. However, the City is currently undergoing a traffic study for the entire Spear Street corridor. The applicant should be prepared to comply with any of the study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. 7. The applicant should comply with any of the Spear Street corridor study's recommendations relating to the proposed development. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The subject property contains a string of wetlands running north -south. The plans clearly depict the required 50 ft. buffer between the wetland areas and the lots being proposed. Thus, there are no problems with regard to the creation of the proposed lots and the existing wetlands. However, the proposed roadway will cross the wetlands on the northern side of the property. 8. The applicant shall obtain advisory comments from the Natural Resource Committee to construct the proposed roadway over the existing wetland, prior to final approval. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the SEQ is outlined in Section 9.01 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. It states that "the location and clustering of buildings and lots in a manner that in the judgment of the Development Review Board will best preserve the open space character of the area shall be encouraged." Staff feels that this purpose would be better promoted if the proposed buildings were more clustered. However, staff also recognizes that it is very difficult to cluster single-family dwellings in a manner that maintains the privacy of owners. As there is a housing demand for single-family dwellings, staff feels it is important to see some of this housing type developed in the City. The wetlands restrict development on a significant strip of land running 1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLI, ,6 TON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\farrell\sketch. doc adjacent to Spear Street, and this open space serves as a nice buffer between the roadway and the proposed development. It is staff's opinion that this project meets the above -mentioned standard very well for a single-family dwelling development. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The wetland area running north -south along the property forms a significant strip of open space. Staff feels this is the ideal location for the open space on the property to fall. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Chief is reviewing the plan for the proposed project. His comments will be made available at the meeting. 9. The applicant should incorporate any of the changes required by the South Burlington Fire Chief into the Preliminary Plat application. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. As mentioned above, the proposed roadway will be extended to the property to the southeast. A right-of-way is proposed to extend to the property to the north, providing a future connection. Thus, the subject property will be connected to both of the adjacent neighborhoods. Also, an 8' wide recreation path is proposed to connect the recreation easement to the southeast of the property to the property to the north. 10. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee shall review the proposed recreation path prior to final approval. 11. The City Engineer shall review the stormwater facilities and utilities plans, prior to final approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The design and layout of these services and infrastructure are compatible with the City's utility and roadway plans. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new electric, telephone, outdoor lighting, and cable distribution systems shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLIi.jTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\fa rrel I\sketch. doc Landscaping. According to Section 13.06(F)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations the Development Review Board shall require street trees to be planted sixty feet on center on both sides of the street, on average and there should be a minimum of two (2) street trees per lot. Also, the Regulations state the applicant shall submit a landscaping phasing plan with the subdivision application. 13. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping plan with the next plan submittal. 14. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant should submit a detailed landscaping budget, prepared by a landscape architect or a professional landscape designer, with the next plan submittal. 15. The plans shall be reviewed by the City Arborist, prior to final approval Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions_ Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. With regard to this requirement, staff has concerns with Lots #5-9 and Lots #21-24. SEQ Restricted Area The subject property does partially fall within a "restricted area", but no development is proposed in this area. Thus, there are no additional regulations pertaining to this development. Other 16. The preliminary plans shall be revised to incorporate the requirements of the City Engineer, as outlined in his Comments dated October 9, 2003 (attached). 17. The preliminary plat plans should include proposed street names. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Eric Farrell, applicant FARRELL REAL ESTATE CO. P.O. Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 802-658-7400 fax 802-860-3594 Memo To: Ray Belair From: Eric Farrell Date: 9/8/2003 Re: Farrell Subdivision - Spear Street Attached please find the following materials in connection with the above referenced project: • APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW • List of Abutters • ABUTTER PLAN • SKETCH PLAN — TJ Boyle & Associates • Application Fee in the amount of $125.00 Please schedule me before the DRB for a Sketch Plan review at its earliest convenience. 1 214 Meadowood Drive S. Burlington, Vt.05403 Oct. 28,2003 John Dinklage, Chairman Development Review Board S. Burlington, Vt. Dear John: I am writing on behalf of the neighbors abutting the proposed Farrell subdivision. We have major concerns about this development, and want to make certain that these are all conveyed to the DRB. We have owned our lot for more than 29 years, and resided there for more than 27 years. We were attracted to the lot initially because of the beautiful sunset views through the trees, and chose to purchase after learning that the field to our west was zoned for one house per 10 acres. We spoke with Gardner Hopwood, who then owned the land (and who had previously sold the land for the Swift Estates development in which we reside); he assured us (verbally) that he had no intention of developing the field, and we in turn assured him that we would preserve his view of the woods. When the zoning was changed some years ago to 1.2 units per acre, we were of course concerned, but assumed that, given Gary Farrell's desire to protect the milieu around his home, and the fact that much of the field was too wet to use for anything, that any subsequent development would be reasonably well spaced out, compatible with the abutting lots, and esthetically pleasing to the neighbors and the city. The proposed subdivision meets none of these expectations. It certainly does not meet the spirit of the law, and it probably does not meet the letter of the law. Gary and Jane Farrell have been exemplary stewards of this land. Neighbors have had unfettered access for walking, mountain biking, snowshoeing and cross-country skiing. We certainly respect their right to develop the land, and had defended this right to many detractors, until we saw the subdivision proposal. The following are our concerns. When the Pinnacle subdivision was being considered, I spoke at a Planning Committee meeting expressing the hope that a recreation easement would be established along the eastern border of the land, where a de facto recreation route has existed since well before we started using it 29 years ago, and where the views are best. John Larkin readily agreed to this, and this easement is in place through the Pinnacle development. It is surprising that Eric Farrell expressed ignorance of this easement, which was shown clearly on the aerial photo which he provided to us. We would certainly expect that the DRB would strongly encourage, and that the Farrells will agree, to continue this easement along the eastern edge of their development. We have maintained an east -west path between our property and the Klehs, giving access from the Farrell's field to Meadowood Drive, and this has been popular with many residents on our street, as well as with some residents of Spear St., Pinnacle and Four Sisters Road. We intend to keep this access open, assuming there will be a recreational easement at the eastern edge of the field, and provided that the housing density in the field is more reasonable than has been initially proposed. The inclusion of Gary and Jane Farrell's house and land in the proposal is curious. The only apparent justification for it would seem to be that they are providing the land for the access road. Including their large 4.17 acre lot in the lot schedule lowers the lot density to 1.1 lots per acre, just under the maximum allowable 1.2 lots per acre. If the Farrell house is excluded from the calculation, the density becomes 1.25 lots per acre, exceeding the zoning limit. Even these figures are generous. They assume, as Eric Farrell has, that all the HOA (homeowners association) lots are appropriate for common property. This land is all too wet to be developed, and some of it is too wet to be accessible. We urge the DRB to deliberate carefully as to whether it makes sense to include all these spaces in the lot schedule. Doing so would result in a lot density that far exceeds the intent of the zoning regulations. In short, it will result in an extension of Pinnacle at Spear, and bring it within stark view of the Spear -Swift intersection. We strongly suggest that the Spear St. access through Gary's land is unnecessary and unwise. Such an access would invite much of the Pinnacle neighborhood as well as the Farrell development to use this road, further complicating Spear St. ingress and egress. The other option would be to proceed with this access, but close access to Pinnacle. The first option is much preferable, because it concentrates traffic flow on existing roads, and obviates building a road across the Farrell wetland. One of these options should be seriously entertained, unless emergency services access absolutely requires dual road approach. There is a major difference between the Farrell proposal and the Pinnacle development. The latter was built out at the same time as the abutting Golf Course development, and each utilized lots of the same size (about 1/3 acre), so that the easterly Pinnacle lots were aligned approximately lot -for -lot against the westerly lots on Four Sisters Road. The Farrell property abuts 3 lots along its eastern border, 2 of which were developed long before Mr. Farrell purchased his land from Gardner Hopwood. The Farrell proposal places eight lots along these three established lots, with an envelope allowing construction within about 15 to 20 feet of the property line. This would be tantamount to building a 2.5 story wall along the properties of the easterly neighbors, effectively blocking out views of sunsets, mountains, and (the little remaining) field. We have anticipated possible development of this field for some time, but never in our wildest dreams (or nightmares) did we imagine that such a dense row of houses, indeed two rows of houses, would be proposed. This is a betrayal and insult to all the development neighbors, and an affront and challenge to our city. It is similarly inappropriate to propose 4 building lots abutting three houses on Spear St. Common sense and esthetic considerations dictate that three building lots, aligned with the neighbors' property lines, would be proper. Indeed, at Pinnacle the developers were required to reduce the number of lots on its westerly border to align with the adjacent neighbors. Logically, the Farrells should be required to meet the same precedent, for both their easterly and westerly neighbors. The Farrell subdivision, as proposed, promises maximum profit for the Farrell family, but helps no one else. It is tasteless, offensive to the neighbors, and will be an unsightly blight on the South Burlington landscape. We urge the DRB to review this proposal critically, and to demand the appropriate revisions. If this proposal were to be approved in anything close to its present form, it would come a long way toward completing the defacement of Spear St. and of the Southeast Quadrant, and the City would have itself to blame. We thank you and the Board in advance for your time and consideration. Respect lly, Michael and Mary Scollins W Permit Number SD- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Gary N & Jane G. Farrell, Karen A. Farrell, Kevin J. Farrell, Brenda F. Cole, Brent N. Farrell — 1350 Spear Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 863-5822 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Vol. 274, page 280 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Eric F. Farrell PO Box 1335, Burlington, VT 05402 658-7400 x25, 860-3594 (fax) 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as applicant PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 105066000 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) A 3-acre parcel of land with a single-family house thereon, plus a separate vacant parcel containing 22 acres b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Subdivide into 27 single-family building lots plus 3 lots to be owned by a Homeowners Association c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 26 new units plus one existing f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Restricted area along east side of Spear 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) 60' ROW for future connection to northern parcel owned by others 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Extension of municipal water & sewer lines 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) See Attached 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 12/31/09 (five yearsA 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is free. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted 1 DATE OF SUBMISSION: Do not write below this line I have reviewedd his sketch plan application and find it to be: (� Com Complete ,I orn fete p ,p Zoning or Designee Date b7 400 1�2 --------- -- 0>0 40 40 le Ti, FARRELL SUBDIVISION List of Abutters September 3, 2003 Parcel Number Name & Address Subject Property: 1640-1340 Karen, Kevin & Brent Farrell and Brenda Cole 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Abutters: 1742-00033 R Larkin / Milot Partnership PO Box 4193 Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01350 R Gary N. & Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1645-00089 R Robert A. & Marjorie N. Skiff 89 Springhouse Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01260 N UVM & State Agricultural College 85 So. Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 1640-01402 R Linda & David Young 1402 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01406 R Douglas J. & Christine Franzoni 1406 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00214 R Michael J. & Mary D. Scollins 214 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01430 R Margareta D. Dencker 1430 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 d 0570-01225 R Ila M. Isham Estate 1225 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1160-00219 R Thomas R. & Louise T. Kleh 219 Meadow Wood Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01302 R Charles & Christine Hager 1302 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Open Space Pinnacle at Spear Pinnacle @ Spear c/o Betsy Carter Real Estate Management, Inc. 81 Ethan Allen Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01400 R William A. & Maureen G. Gilbert 1400 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01408 R George A. Sporzynski 1408 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01317 R Consuela Bailey Estate c/o Luther Hackett 1295 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01331 R Robert & Estaleen Lavigne 1331 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01393 R William & Tanya Cimmonetti 1393 Spear Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 1640-01404 R T �l �1 C- 29 Pinnacle Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 -'6�d er (,�v1-Esa1