Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0237 Spear Street (2)SOY ' I30LINGTON ZONING BOAPD � ADJUSTMSN'I' Findings in accordance with Section 446e of_ the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ff (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; [ L� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Li Date �-- - //- S6 Appellant Z. Vote: Yes No List findings below: 1. - ,dz__ • J Appeal # 7 Sign 2. �` G✓..ti �� �ic� s ,� Yi yw yv .7 sit J rr e h� , "T V SOY - BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD 1 ADJUSTMSNT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of_ the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the pariticular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical* circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (B (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant r ! �C /er , Vote: Yes � No Sign _ List findings below• y 2. �! is SOLr BUFLINGTON ZONING BOARD C( 4DJUSTMSN'r Findings in accordance with Section 446e of- the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 9 (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; [A— (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and _ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �-- Date Appellant Vote: Yes ('j No List findings below: -V—/iA1—A-KcrsL N0-r rKc,gIN S-� r"[ i C . ��7 a✓�% 2. 3. Appeal # '1 S i g n / 4Q- -e y L [ �x-2�/� SOY BUPLINGTON ZONING BOA%D 1 ADJUSTMII N'r Findings in accordance with Section 446e of- the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; jam' (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (—.,.jam (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; �-- lid (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 19-- (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Da t e Appella t Vote: Yes r7m No Sign List findings below_ 1. 2. 3 SoF-I BURLINGTON "ZONING BOAT?D I ,_ ADJUS' M' 'Nlr Findings in accordance with Section 446e of -the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and riot the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;. (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; F1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; I -I (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant ®e Vote: Yes No Sig n'� � Q List findings below: S1ott-- r 3. 2S SOY-" I3UP LINGTONZONING I30AP I) T_ ADJ USTM!!.NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of -the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located �..—j (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; }r- u (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and'--X--.,i (5) That the variance, if authorized, will rleep.�resent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes � No p List findin below: Appeal Sign _ � � S At SOY—' 13UPLINGTON ZONING BOA?D 1 •_ ADJUS' M' ,N'r Findings in accordance with Section 446P of_ the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j (2) That because of such physical 'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1 ;-- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (•'�i (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �v Dateg ll48b Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: o -- 1 2. 3• Appeal Sign _