HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-87-0000 - Supplemental - 0106 Spear Street (2)SOUTH HUHLINGTON 'CONING I30AI 1) 0!,' ADJUS'I,X'.,NT
Findings in accordance with Section 446i of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; 0
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a
Appeal
Da t e
Appellant
Vote: Yes No Sign
List findings below:
" i n
2 -- —
VIVI-
3- -
SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOAi`:D 014' ADJUS'1'X^ -,NT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
Is located;
(2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; Ej
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
D
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent ,property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and 10
v
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Date
112-1�
Appeal #
,Appellant
Vote: Yes No Sign �`
Q
List
findings
below:
2.
3•
SOUTH BUHLINGTON 'I.ONING BOAT D OF ADJUS'1'."NT
Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; 9
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; 5j
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and W
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Da to h t /r
-t
,Appellant
Vote: Yes
List findings below:
0
2.
3•
Appeal # i IZ B7
Sign �� W.
SOUTH BUHLINGTON 'ZONING I3OAii1) Off' ADJUS'TMu 'N'11
Findings in accordance with Section 4460 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; [ —_
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; [
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and tT
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ]
Date �ILIy'Z
,Appellant (T41r
Vote: Yes No E]
List findings below:
Appeal #
Sign
do Ucan. W r ti C �� , 4 "' d
NOQ
2.�J4 i`w c re.4 CGvy lclrk� -
3 , P2; )v irk c,m V /J n � l'.tee y-------
SOUTH HUHLINGTON 'ZONING 130Ai:1) 01�' ADJUSTM' NT
Findings in accordance with Section 446P of. the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; L
(3) That such unnec ssary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
11/1
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent pxbperty, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Date / / -;-
�A l
0
Appellant
Vote: Yes 0
List findings below:
1. �=
2.
No 0
Appeal # /
r
Sign
� U �
SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING 130Ai:1) 0!�' ADJUS'1IX° ,,NT
Findings in accordance with Section 4460 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district In which the property
is located; 1Z
(2) That because of such:physical'circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; 1X
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; n
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and �j
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Appeal #
Date
17
Appellant
Vote: Yes No p Sign
List flndinL-s below:
1.
2.
3-
SOUTH 13UPLINGTON 'ZONING I3OAI?D 01�' ADJUST'," ,NT
"Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the par.ticular.property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located; 1
0"
(2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; (�f
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the
appellant; n-
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and jam(
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Da to /— /') --f7
Appellant
Vote: Yes No Q
List findings below:
3.
Appeal #
Sign