Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-87-0000 - Supplemental - 0106 Spear Street (2)SOUTH HUHLINGTON 'CONING I30AI 1) 0!,' ADJUS'I,X'.,NT Findings in accordance with Section 446i of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Appeal Da t e Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: " i n 2 -- — VIVI- 3- - SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOAi`:D 014' ADJUS'1'X^ -,NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located; (2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Ej (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; D (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent ,property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 10 v (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date 112-1� Appeal # ,Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign �` Q List findings below: 2. 3• SOUTH BUHLINGTON 'I.ONING BOAT D OF ADJUS'1'."NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 9 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 5j (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and W (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to h t /r -t ,Appellant Vote: Yes List findings below: 0 2. 3• Appeal # i IZ B7 Sign �� W. SOUTH BUHLINGTON 'ZONING I3OAii1) Off' ADJUS'TMu 'N'11 Findings in accordance with Section 4460 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; [ —_ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; [ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and tT (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ] Date �ILIy'Z ,Appellant (T41r Vote: Yes No E] List findings below: Appeal # Sign do Ucan. W r ti C �� , 4 "' d NOQ 2.�J4 i`w c re.4 CGvy lclrk� - 3 , P2; )v irk c,m V /J n � l'.tee y------- SOUTH HUHLINGTON 'ZONING 130Ai:1) 01�' ADJUSTM' NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of. the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; L (3) That such unnec ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 11/1 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pxbperty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date / / -;- �A l 0 Appellant Vote: Yes 0 List findings below: 1. �= 2. No 0 Appeal # / r Sign � U � SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING 130Ai:1) 0!�' ADJUS'1IX° ,,NT Findings in accordance with Section 4460 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district In which the property is located; 1Z (2) That because of such:physical'circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1X (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; n (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and �j (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date 17 Appellant Vote: Yes No p Sign List flndinL-s below: 1. 2. 3- SOUTH 13UPLINGTON 'ZONING I3OAI?D 01�' ADJUST'," ,NT "Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the par.ticular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1 0" (2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (�f (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; n- (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and jam( (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to /— /') --f7 Appellant Vote: Yes No Q List findings below: 3. Appeal # Sign