The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-88-0000 - Supplemental - 0495 Spear Street (2)SOUTH BURL1 NGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the {Tanning he Development Act That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (/ tk n N7 .-.cam A / (c.-6 /c41 LJ t- I-/' (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; -e x,i Y I— .9 n.,,1„ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; A.L Z60tI.-ItiI-1,1a / 455L -Z--, 1,e;5-�ix,I-a--Z (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of t h e plan. /11 '-Y- i,..,,,.__ 1/ ✓s A Appeal ----=3 --- — Date Appellant Z. Vote: Yes No I- -- S i g n Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BORLI NGTON ZONING BOARD U1� ADJUS'1'MEN'T Findings in accordance with Section 11t;H of, the {Tanning h Development. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional t.opograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that, the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; n n ✓ C.LC� (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable t�pyeasonable use of the property; �C (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; . J''Z _mot 1 - �.., Y (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be-detriment.,rl;tolfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zo regulations and of the plan. -� -- --_ - - Da t, e Appel- Vote: Use Reverse side for additional r - Sign findings - — - -- findings SOUTII BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of, the 111annirig k Development. Act (I) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional t.opograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 7ivc (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; /L--C- (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of t h e plan. __ /f? •:� �:�+ �.� 1/.v,.- -e -- -- - ---- (� Appeal —--- Date Appellant - d�nq--La e", Vote: Yes 1 No 11 Sign -- (55;" Use Reverse side for additional finding SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4-168 of' the PItinnirig & Development. Act (2) (3) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the ghb hood or distric in which the property is located; Ole That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessa o enable �tp reas na lus of the property;-/(�i�� That such unnec ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; , 1 / -4 -0 (4) That the variance, if autho 9Kzed, will not alter tEe essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property,_ng-r be detrimental to the publiv_welfare; ,/ (5) That t!he variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulation and of the plan. — Appeal k -- Uat.e Appellant Vote: Y s 1 No 1---- 1 Sign _ - Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURL, I NGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446H of the Planning k Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or condition,-;, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 4�:,,;tci Uc0) FACAA T)"--// 0 lOv nj T?U CCU f C • S . � Dt'; C .vG,-)lC4M 4" CQ �s PAR 0-6 i7ES �Zo� . � c� V. (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; / G Q.(;Q/L 7Z) Pl'1- A , -J ; AtOY 1 T£- C 7N yAZ / /f7k-u r)-,ee a-e (3) That such unnecessary ardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; _1E )y / T w / LC 6? A-)tMy 0�- / i t S 80(Z/� (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. - --- - --- - -- Appeal Date Appellant L Vote: Yes L No Sign — Use Reverse side for additional f'indings� SOUTH BURLIN(:TON ZONING IMAkl) OF AUJUS'1'MF.N'T Findings in accordance with Section 146' i of the Planning k Development. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or, other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that. the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighbo ood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; _ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; �l (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare_�� (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will repre nt the least modification possible of the zoning reg► ations and of the plan. Appeal Da t e 8-l-=-1`-►1( ! - — -- -- --- - Appel l a n t W-W -- ----- - Vote: Yes I_,.�� No I S i gn Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4168 of the Planning k Development, Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional t.opograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of t h e plan. ------- ly � Appeal Date Z-5h%-------- - A p p e l l a n t L1.� ------ -- - Vote: Yes 1 No L Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings