Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0663 0667 Spear Street` 1 TL State of Vermont WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-0544-4 PIN: EJ74-0001 Landowner: University of Vermont State Agricultural College 109 South Prospect St. Burlington VT 05401 This permit affects property referenced — deeds recorded in Book 20 Page 8 of the Land Records in Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of amending Permit #WW-4-0544 for a 7,339 square foot addition to Building 721, the existing bioresearch laboratory and freezer facility, served by municipal water and wastewater services located at 663 Spear Street in the City of Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C0637. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 879-2300, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans that have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Proj. No. 05228, Drawing Number C1 "Proposed Conditions Plan" dated Nov., 2005 last revised 12/15/05 and Drawing Number C3 "Site and Utility Details" dated Nov., 2005 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 5. All conditions set forth in Permit #WW-4-0544 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 6. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the water and wastewater disposal systems under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 64 — Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-0544-4 University of Vermont Page 2 7. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 9. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or th., installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests. This shall include the water service and sanitary sewer lines to the structure. 10. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of obtaining potable water without prior review and approval. 11. The connection of a sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water supply system shall require the installation and maintenance of back flow prevention devices which conform to the standards acceptable to the Department of Labor and Industry and the Water Supply Division. 12. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on March 17, 2006. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BY Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C For the Record Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Water Supply Division Act 250 District Environmental Commission #4 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety The V nip- ersity of Vermont DEPARTMENT OF RISK MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY FACILITY 655D SPEAR STREET BURLINGTON. VT 05405-0570 " 802/656-5400 FAX # 802/656-5407 November 22, 2000 To Neighbors of UVM's Environmental Safety Facility: Last month, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources approved two Class 1 modifications to the operating permit for UVM's Environmental Safety Facility (ESF)at 655D Spear Street. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of those changes in compliance with federal and state regulations. One modification reflects changes made to the Waste Analysis portion of the permit. These changes are a result of revised regulations which govern UVM's hazardous waste handling procedures. The second modification is a result of changes to the Contingency Plan. Specifically, these changes reflect new personnel, phone numbers and response organizations. If you have any questions regarding these changes, our permit or the operations of the ESF, or if you would like to receive a copy of any of these documents, please call me at 656-5400. Sincerely, - Francis Churchill Environmental Safety Compliance Manager State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation March 28, 2000 UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE 109 So. Prospect St. Burlington VT 05405-0016 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802)879-5656 Permit # WW-4-0544, UVM Environmental Safety Facility -- construct 8300 sf building for hazardous waste storage facility,also connect bld 721,723,724,726,727,728 & Brown bldg to municipal water & sewer located on Spear Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Permitee: Conditions 10, 12 and 13 required inspections and reports by a professional engineer to be submitted to the Division before occupying the building or placing the sanitary sewer service line in use. We have no record of receiving the inspection reports. Please submit them at your earliest convenience. Please note that any changes to the water or sewer lines/systems, or changes in use that increase the demands of the systems, may require a permit from this office. Sincerely, �J )es'e Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer City of South Burlington Planning Commission Kenneth M. Stone TDD: 1-800-253-0191 100% Processed Chlorine Free Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct. /Pittsford1Rutland/Springfie ld/St. Johnsbury 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 —LAMOUREUX & STONE — Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors March 25, 1993 Mr. William Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: UVM Environmental Safety Facility Sewer Design Dear Bill: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 In response to your review letter of March 19, 1993, regarding the above referenced project, we offer the following information: Sewer Lines 1. The manhole to the south of Building 727 is located in a proposed new gravel parking area and should be easily accessed by mobil cleaning equipment. The locations of manholes 3, 4, 5 and 6 were chosen to minimize impact on the sensitive adjacent community gardens, in addition to providing adequate but not excessive burial depths of the new sewers. Also, the 6" water line to the Bioresearch complex runs adjacent to the road. Since its exact location is not known, we felt the new sewer should be designed well away from the edge of the road to prevent interference. Two local Contractors specializing in sewer pumping and cleaning were contacted. Both have adequate pumping and jet cleaning hose to allow them to park on the access road and still reach the above referenced manholes. 2. We feel a thoroughly compacted sand bedding (Class II soil type), will provide the structural support required for the 4" PVC force main. We have enclosed copies of pages from the Unibell pipe catalog indicating the suitability of sand bedding for PVC pipe. 3. The gravity sewer service along Spear Street was intended to serve the UVM farmhouse only. The scope of this project was not to design a collection system for all of the residents along this section of Spear Street; however, the pump station was sized adequately to accept these future connections. Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning • Land Surveying Mr. William Szymanski March 25, 1993 Page 2 Fnrr,a Main 1. We agree that a valve on the cleanout riser would facilitate easier maintenance operations. With the approval of the University, we will instruct the Contractor to install the valves. Pumping Station 1. With the approval of the University, we will instruct the Contractor to install a gate valve on the emergency connection. 2. During construction we will instruct the Contractor to place the control panel on the east side of the pump station (facing Spear Street), and as close to the pump station structure as possible. 3. Ken Bean of the University has stated that the Physical Plant has adequate equipment and capabilities to remove the pumps or other appurtenances within the pump station. 4. With the access hatch in the center of the structure, and the rungs placed on the outside wall, it is an awkward and somewhat dangerous maneuver for a person to lower their body through the hatch and swing their legs to the top rung. This structure can be considered a confined space with possible hazardous vapors. Any person entering this structure should have the appropriate training, gas measuring devices and personal safety equipment required for entering such confined spaces. By eliminating the rungs you restrict the personnel entering the pump station to those properly equipped with ladders and the necessary safety equipment referenced above. The lifting rail system also reduces to need for people to enter the station. 5. We concur with your request for piping to be wrapped with plastic to prevent bonding with concrete. We will instruct the Contractor to wrap the piping in these locations. 6. We have required shop drawings of the control panel and will review them to insure they are made in the U.S. and contain schematics and a parts list. 7. Drawing P-1 has been revised depicting the 6" gravity sewer from the farmhouse flowing into the pump station instead of the valve pit. Mr. William Szymanski March 25, 1993 Page 3 Thank you for your comments. Feel free to call our office if you would like to discuss any of these issues further. Sincerely, Doug Goulette, P.E. enc. cc: Ken Bean j-m\9041 bill.djg TABLE 10.8 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CLASSIFICATION As Denned In ASTM D 2321 Pacrntage Pa sing SIeVe t07es At1s bcr tLimits Coefficients Uni- Crva- No.200 Class Type Soil Group Symbol Description ASTM D 2487 1.5 in No. 4 (0.075 (40 mm) (4.75 mm) mm) IL PI formity tune Cu Cc IA Manufactured Aggregates: None Angular, crushed stone or rock, crushed gravel 100% 510% <5% Non Plastic open -graded, clean. broken coral, crushed slag, cinders or shells; large void content, contain little or no fines IB Manufactured, Processed None Angular, crushed stone (or other Class 1A nu- 100% 550% <5% Non Plastic Aggregates; dense -graded terials) and atoncJgand mixtures with grads - clean. tions selected to minimize migration of adjacent soils; contain little or no fines 11 Coarse -Grained Soils, GW Well -graded gravels and gravel -sand mixtures; 100% <50% of <.5% Non Plastic >4 1 to 3 clean little or no fines Coarse Fraction GP Poorly -graded gravels and gravel -sand mix- <4 <1 or>3 cures; little or no fines SW Well -graded sands and gravelly sands; little or >50% of >6 1 to 3 no fines Coarse Fraction SP Poorly -graded sands and gravelly sands; little <6 <1 or>3 or no fines Coarse -Grained Soils, bor- e.g. GW-GC, Sands and gravels which are border -line 100% Vanes 5% to Non Plastic Same as for GW, derline clean to w/fines SP-SM. between clean and with fines 12% GP, SW and SP III Coarse -Grained Soils GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures 100% <50% of >12% to <4 or <"A" Line With Fines Coarse Fraction <50% GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay rnixtwes <7 and >"A" Line SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures >50% of >4 or <"A" Line Coarse Fraction SC Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures >7 and >"A" Line IVAA Fhte-Grained Soils (inor- ML Inorganic gilts and very fine sands, rock flour, 100% 100% >50% <50 <4 or <"A" ganic) silty or clayey fine sands, silts with slight Line plasticity Ch Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, >7 and >"A" gravely clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean Line Clays w 10 00 General Recommenda- tions and Restrictions Foundation TABLE 10.9 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND USE, OF SOILS AND AGGREGATES FOR FOUNDATION, EMIIEDMENT AND BACKFILL Class IA Do not use where condi- tions may cause mi- gration of fines from adjacent soil and loss of pipe support. Suitable for use as a drainage blanket and underdrain in rode cuts where ad- jacent material is suit- ably graded. Suitable as foundation and for replacing over - excavated and unstable trench bottom as re- stricted above. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Suitable as restricted above. Install in 6-in. maximum layers. Level foul grade by hand. Minimum depth 4 in. (6 in. in rock cuts). Soil Class (see Table 10.8)A Class IB Process materials as required to obtain gra- dation which will mini- mize migration of ad- jacent materials. Suit- able for use as drainage blanket and underdrain. Suitable as foundation and for replacing over - excavated and unstable trench bottom. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Install and compact in 6- in. maximum layers. Level final grade by hand. Minimum depth 4 in. (6 in. in rock cuts). Class II Where hydraulic gradient exists check gradation to minimize migration. "Clean" groups suitable for use as drainage blanket and underdrain. Suitable as a foundation and for replacing over - excavated and unstable trench bottom as re- stricted above. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Suitable as restricted above. Install and compact in 6-in. maxi mum layers. Level food grade by hand. Minimum depth 4 in. (6 in. in rock cuts). Class III Do not use where water conditions in trench may cause instability. Suitable as foundation and for replacing over - excavated trench bottom as restricted above. Do not use in thicknesses greater than 12 in. total. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Suitable only in dry trench conditions. In- stall and compact in 6- in. maximum layers. Level final grade by hand. Minimum depth 4 in. (6 in. in rock cuts). Class IV -A Obtain geotectnical evaluation of proposed material. May not be suitable under high earth fills, surface ap- plied wheel loads and under heavy vibratory compactors and tampers. Do not use where water conditions in trench may cause instability. Suitable only in undis- turbed condition and where trench is dry. Remove all loose ma- terial and provide firm, uniform trench bottom before bedding is placed. Suitable only in dry trench conditions and when optimum place- ment and compaction control is maintained. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Level final grade by hand. Minimum depth 4 In. (6 Irt. in rod* kaMal vac. ^�}t`j� w 10 TABLE 10.9 - Continued Soil Class (see Table 10.8)A Class 1A Class LB Class II Class III Class IV -A Haunching Suitable as restricted Install and compact in 6- Suitable as restricted Suitable as restricted Suitable only in dry above. Install in 6-in. in. maximum layers. above. Install and above. Install and com- trench conditions and maximum layers. Work Work in around pipe by compact in 6-in. maxi- pact in 6-in. maximum when optimum place - in around pipe by hand hand to provide uniform mum layers. Work in layers. Work in around ment and compaction to provide uniform support. around pipe by hand to pipe by hand to provide control is maintained. support. provide uniform support uniform support. Install and compact in 6-in. maximum layers. Work in around pipe by hand to provide uniform support. Initial Backfill Suitable as restricted Install and compact to a Suitable as restricted Suitable as restricted Suitable as restricted above. Install to a minimum of 6 in. above. Install and above. Install and above. Install and minimum of 6 in. above above pipe crown. compact to a minimum compact to a minimum compact to a minimum pipe crown. of 6 in. above pipe of 6 in. above pipe of 6 in. above pipe crown. crown. crown. Final Backfill Compact as required by Compact as required by Compact as required by Compact as required by Suitable as restricted the engineer. the engineer. the engineer. the engineer. above. Compact as required by the engineer. AClass IV-B (MH-CH) and Class V (OL, OH, PT) Materials are unsuitable as embedment. They may be used as final backfill as permitted by the engineer. HANDBOOK OF PVC PIPE Class II Materials: Class II materials, when compacted, provide a rela- tively high level of pipe support. In most respects, they have all the desir- able characteristics of Class IB materials when widely graded. However, open graded groups may allow migration and the sizes should be checked for compatibility with adjacent material. Typically, Class II materials con- sist of rounded particles and are less stable than angular materials unless they are confined and compacted. Class III Materials: Class III materials provide less support for a given density than Class I or Class II materials. High levels of compactive effort may be required unless moisture content is controlled. These materials provide reasonable levels of pipe support once proper density is achieved. Class IV -A Materials: Class IV -A materials require a geotechnical eval- uation prior to use. Moisture content must be near optimum to minimize compactive effort and achieve the required density. Properly placed and compacted, Class IV -A materials can provide reasonable levels of pipe sup- port; however, these materials may not be suitable under high fills, surface applied wheel loads or under heavy vibratory compactors and tampers. Do not use where water conditions in the trench may cause instability and result in uncontrolled water content. Migration: When coarse and open -graded material is placed adjacent to a finer material, fines may migrate into the coarser material under the action of hydraulic gradient from ground water flow. Significant hydraulic gradi- ents may arise in the pipeline trench during construction when water levels are being controlled by various pumping or well -pointing methods, or after construction when permeable underdrain or embedment materials act as a "french" drain under high ground water levels. During construction,. downward percolation of surface water can carry fine granular haunching materials down into more coarse, open -graded bedding materials if the trench is not properly designed and constructed. The gradation and relative': size of the embedment and adjacent materials must be compatible in order to minimize migration. In general, where significant ground water flow iJan—% ticipated, avoid placing coarse, open -graded materials, such as Clasabove, below or adjacent to finer materials, unless methods are employimpede migration such as the use of an appropriate stone filter or filterfalong the boundary of the incompatible materials. Embedment Compaction The moisture content of embedment materials should be maintawithin suitable limits to permit placement and compaction to required 1with reasonable efforts. For non -free draining soils, such as Class III 400 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 November 3, 1992 Mr. Kenneth Bean Associate Architect University of Vermont Architectural and Engineering Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, Vermont 05405-0016 Re: Environmental Safety Facility, Spear Street Dear Mr. Bean: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 23, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerely, J e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 August 18, 1992 Mr. Kenneth C. Bean Associate Architect University of Vermont Architectural and Engineering Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, Vermont 05405-0016 Re: Truck Traffic on Spear Street Dear Mr. Bean: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter serves as confirmation that the City will allow the University to have trucks larger than the 24,000 pound weight posting traveling on Spear Street between the Bio-research complex access road and Williston Road. Please be advised that no through traffic will be allowed south of the Bio-research access road. In addition, please note that the University will be required to obtain an overweight truck permit from the City. Please contact Pam Hameline at 658-7953. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. n erely, e Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp PLArTMT' TG COMMISSION JUNE 23, 1992 page 4 new building__,,_._The applicant shall 2a,L this re uired sewer al- location fee prior to permit. 4. The Plannin Commission a roves the ro osed 60 foot wide curb cut in order to adeqqatel_y accommodate car qelkvp�r_y trucks. 5. An new -lighting,shall be downcap�ting shielded luminaire and shall not cast li ht beyond the property line. 6. The plan shall be revised prior to final plat to show the followin : a. sheet #1 shall show the distance and bearin for the westerl boundary;_ b. draina e easement consistent with_plan filed in land records; c. sheets 1, S-1, and S-2 shall be consistent in terms ofgarking layout and number of parkin spaces; d. the 2 parkin spaces closest to Shelburne Rd. removed 7. The 15 foot easement for the water line on the ad'oinin ro- pert_y to the west shall be recorded in the South Burling ton Land Records priorto issuance of a zonin buildin ermit. The ease- ment shall be a roved b the Cit Attorne rior to recordin . 8. As ex ress1 represented b the a licant, the a licant shall install plantin s along the stream bank to help stabilize the areas currently experiencing erosion. 9. The final lat a lication shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Presentation by the University of Vermont - proposed environ- mental safety facility, UVM Bio Research Complex, Spear Street: Mr. Burgess asked the representatives to limit their remarks to those issues that affect South Burlington. Mr. Bean showed a model of the proposed facility. The univer- sity has been working on the project since 1988 when they could no longer ship out chemical byproducts from research labs. The state has mandated that these be handled on campus. The state has reviewed the Part B permit from the standpoint of safety, management, etc., and this process took 2 years. The university has also met with the City Manager, City Planner and a Council member to discuss impacts to the city. Neighbors have been ap- prised of the plan. The site is across from the Dairy Farm on the Bio Research site. PLANNING COMMISSION 23 June 1992 page 5 The facility will house a chemical distribution center (chemi- cals will no longer be delivered right to labs) and also a central area to store wastes (which are now being stored in many areas on campus). Wastes will be picked up by a professional waste management company. There will be approximately 8300 sq. ft. on one floor which will include some offices, a diagnostic lab. It will be located in the middle of a field with a parking area nearby. They will build up the site with fill to create a berm with a chain link fence around it. This will by landscaped to minimize the impact. All chemicals will be in fire-resistant containers. Chemicals will be in drums in fireproof rooms. There will be a full sprinkler system. The state has given UVM a permit to store up to 200 55-gallon drums. Mr. Bean said they would want to use S. Burlington Water. Very little traffic is expected. It would be limited to those who work on the site. There would be one small truck for staff use. All chemical carrying vehicles will be plackarded. The City of Burlington would provide fire protection. They re- ceive a lot of training in this area. There will be no storage outside the facility except for reactives which will be in a small outside building. Mrs. Maher noted the possibility of the facility using the city's sewer system. Mr. Bean said there would be no industrial waste only a sanitary sewer use. Mr. Poger suggested limiting the hours when tractor trailers can go through the jug -handle. Ms. Archer said there would be only two tractor -trailers per year. Mr. Burgess asked if the facility would do any repackaging. He felt this could result in bulk chemical deliveries. Ms. Archer said they are not looking at huge amounts. Mr. Burgess said there could be many deliveries for this and these could come in huge tractor trailers. Mr. Crowley raised the question of air pollution. Ms. Archer said they have received an air pollution control permit and they will be required to monitor this. Mr. Crowley asked about bio-engineering waste. Ms. Archer said they are only permitted for hazardous waste and they won't PLANNING COMMISSION 23 June 1992 page 6 get into bio-engineering waste. Mr. Burgess thanked the UVM representatives for their pre- sentation. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:00pm. Clerk STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICE 120 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05620-2601 TEL.: (802) 828-2811 FAX: (802) 828-2342 TTY/TDD (VT): 1-800-734-8390 MEMORANDUM TO: District 4 Environmental Commission FROM: y,� Stuart Slote, Demand -Side Management Specialist Energy Efficiency Division DATE: October 13, 1992 SUBJECT: University of Vermont and State Agricultural College (#4C0637-2) I have reviewed the information submitted by Kenneth C. Bean regarding the project relative to Criterion 9(F) and 9(J). In general the information indicates an energy efficient design. However, there are a few items which the DPS requests further clarification on, which are listed below. All other items are satisfactory. 1. All proposed motor efficiencies are acceptable except the 1-4 HP category. The minimum 82.5% level is acceptable for 1 HP motors. However, for motors larger than 1 HP up to and including 4 HP motors, higher minimum efficiencies should be proposed. DPS recommends that UVM contact GMP to inquire about the GMP motor efficiency program and meet the specify the minimum efficiencies. 2. Regarding motor power factor for motors, 1 HP or larger, the proposal to only correct for power factor when below 85% is unacceptable. DPS recommends that all motors achieve a minimum 90% power factor, in order to ensure that the project meets Criterion 9(J). 3. Plan E2 specifies fixtures type "A, B and c" with energy saving ballasts and 40 watt fluorescent lamps. However, Item 8 in the letter from Michael Van Buren states that fluorescent ballasts will be electronic type ballasts and lamps will be T-8 lamps. Please clarify this discrepancy. mform.50 Type "P" is a 150 watt incandescent lamp. This lamp should be compared with a tungsten -halogen flood lamp, if applicable. I assume that the lighting power budgets will meet the Burlington energy guideline levels. 4. For HVAC system, efficiency levels are not available since the equipment has not yet been chosen. The proposal to meet the Burlington energy guidelines is acceptable. However, I request the applicant submit this information when available, prior to any construction or site work. DPS also requests that information on heat recovery and hot water systems be submitted as well. I request that the Commission include the aforementioned as part of a condition to the Land Use Permit issued to allow for DPS review and comment and approval by the Commission. SS/ Enclosure cc: Kurt Janson, Esq., Land Use Attorney, ANR all parties mform.50 The University of Vermont a ` ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES. 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET e . BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05405-0016 TEL. (802) 656-3291 FAX (802) 656-8410 August 7, 1992 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Truck Traffic on Spear Street Dear Joe: We are in the process of preparing the Act 250 Application for the Environmental Safety Facility. Please send a letter confirming our discussion that the City of South Burlington will allow the University to have trucks larger than the 24,000 pound weight posting traveling between the access road to the Bio-research Complex and Williston Road. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Kenneth C. Bean Associate Architect KCB/jeh -.. f. c Ir r..,..) I jweith.kcb r t �)Gt�Q 0 iF� Hi U x •�� j 28D F$t'�t�• ttt tt• C ffic.e .af the CITit" axe 'fflar5h t CITY FIRE MARSHAL 132 NORTH AVENUE FIRE ALARM Div. - 658-1543 (802) 864-5577 Burlington, Vermont 05401 PUBLIC INFORMATION & EDUCATION (802) 658-9300 (TDD) • Fax (802) 658-7665 INSPECTION SERVICES Kenneth Bean (802) 864-6923 University of Vermont Architectural & Engineering Services 109 South Prospect St. Burlington, Vermont 05406-0016 Re: Proposed UVM Environmental Safety Facility (Project 89020) CERTIFICATE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL, AS FOLLOWS: I, John T. Vincent Jr., City of Burlington Fire Marshal, Do hereby certify that the subject plat plan has been examined by me and found to comply with the Fire Prevention requirements set forth in r Chapter 28 of the Code of Ordinances governing plans of subdivided land adopted by the City Council with the following exceptions: 1. Complete complex to be protected with automatic sprinkler system. 2. Emergency vehicle access to be provided - 18 feet clear width. All turning radius to be clear for firefighting apparatus. 3. Adequate water supply to be provided - Fire hydrants to meet Burlington Fire Department specifications. 4. UVM to provide specialized equipment as agreed to in September 18, 1992 meeting. When this equipment is placed in service, the Burlington Fire Department can provide adequate p otectio . 4 - rZ J n T. Vincent Jr. City Fire Marshal fully agree with signq,{zre) the above -mentioned exceptions. DATE: 10. 1Q L l 7/ cc: Ken Le SMOKE DETECTORS AND FIRE SPRINKLgRS SAVElLIVES iz The University of Vermont �t- ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET ,-: .� BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05405-0016 �,_-z TEL. (802) 656-3291 " FAX (802) 656-8410 July 15, 1992 Mr. Bill Symanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington Municipal Offices 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sewer Hookup for the UVM Bio-research Center and the Proposed Environmental Safety Facility (A&E Services Project BIOR89020) Dear Mr. Symanski: Thank you for meeting with Milly Archer and me on May 26, 1992, to discuss this project. I have attached our engineers' calculations of the sewage generated by the Bio-research Complex and the proposed Environmental Safety Facility. The total flow is 2,025 gallons per day. I understand there is a sewer impact fee of $2.50/gallon/day and the sewer rate will be similar to that of the Burlington Country Club since we do not pay taxes to the City of South Burlington (the tax rate helping to maintain your system and plants). I am preparing an Act 250 application for the Environmental Safety facility and request a letter from you confirming that the Airport Parkway treatment plant has the capacity to accommodate the daily flow from the Bio-research Complex and the Environmental Safety Facility. Please forward this to me as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, 4AIII,- t)�� Ken Bean Associate Architect KCB/ jeh cc: L. Seavey M. Boudreau C. Hafter B. Cimonetti J. Wyeth ✓ bioressewer.kcb . _,W: 44 iit ;...::....— ..::.ea.. — — w.---rrY. - ....a.zi. — .1— .� �ut'Q�111R S,) O 77�ii tuYL- i y j o o avi v B a` rn o c� o ¢z a \1� •,` y 41 1 tenet OMI ■INI•YO a , )8000,n N. 4927 4926 1 +akeview rz �` �y r' •� f�i of .° ��•� �� �� ' I .I LS..f : '� — -. M V N��:== Cem�� „ ' ^ ! \ 7 \\\�hy I_ ::� S S E Y 'O-�,, \• —_ L.JI `- --_1i. : /�/��15 \•���\y ," Qua- LLm`e P Qu , It Lane Rock Point _ :• '�__ ��oa❑_� _ _� \- % -MOO, ;,\�_ �; V� RIVER ;'�'?,j7 _ '5;:'fti• .� a S • a`�' . - _ , I _ `-Sub Sta _ `Jln �uu = •,T P� 47�:9Y° \•v llUl�7�77 ❑ O I 1 ❑ — `_ ':� � = i / ``'� o°� ;ice' � j! i7 ... ,,,) I��I'h. c� r Gas •. • •��� ILL DJ ' d •�.� __ - i Tanks t ? •� ��• , •��r ) I ��� ra ? \ „� y:, l, � M❑ ° �' / A tarries i �� l� Al I •� i u A A l� � L— J � � ii �l 0 D ' =� r /1 • .• L tt . •��,P�arOireenmount . ` .c�' ^ ®\ V�� �i /�/�'• f%� c�+'4 =_ L %?�,/� ' G 8eacon LightGa \ a�L! ��C L— a • Pit l /1Cem \ _xc> \ : \\ w /� v. • LI' // b��L rod —_ v� "~ C' Tanks i I+ ❑ •r iI a ��i// �� ` - o • �� �, ij� �•� (�\ '� : \: `�_^� au Ncro \ UlliVerslly of Verniolit ion to �� Ed % 'ti „•� r • ; � �,1 j " JJ� ter; J _ _ f; `� IN ATIO AIRP nnclirTECTunnL $ ENGrNEEflrrlG sLnVlcEs ❑❑ V e I " r ;High se l , • /n ' °i I >�i L= _ �� • j ] , (—r` — ��'`, 109 SOU111 Pr10sr'ECr STr1EET �' �� { ° / ! ! j I I ' L • % �• � l �' \�`� \� \ U(In rNGTON, VERMONT 05'105-00I G OY (002) GAG 3291 •� deacon Light • L I .. �' 1 ;I ,I. �•� / T er N:� - . n� , /� '�` ,� �_ \ . \\ram N 27'30" \ �, 4924 \ � !h. \ Oa \do U \� \mod Nz� 4923 Shelburne Point '22 / !� m \♦ cc CO J sr�i L• i` I ; li/,� ' _ . si 1., �` _ i; a = P r(? j e c f Waarl hy1, Proposed r ;I �� _ : �'LJ I i I •'� i"��� South Environmental l /i R • Burlington Bur w 1 q-} N Club • :"�na . I Country Cd ==i11 • F . .'', ��• - Sc to, ❑ Safety Facility •ban : •• � •.\,`- _."�'� u\ ' �I _ : • � ; - ,•tea\ • �•. :�—` - L Park,�'� j •� • `\ \� Q` r�.' /' �' Cem \I• ��v �f1-• _ I: •. a:.. p ii n '��r ,.Ir a ii • ,�• Project No. �►•i� �OZc ��ui "! 4�1� r - .. �� --� �� • -1 . ��.,•; Scale l` =Zcct::? FT. :.:. •°�-�� •' • _ r �/ j •`� :�l , IZ% \ �• Drawn by J R P �a -MTaM L`_ i .\ �� I ,; �� ,;r �� .1, ,1.1 , 1 �� // \� Checked by KCB '„ - •i:_ �i / I I;= I� �; _ Date Dec. 27, -1988 k Led g y . ❑' •�"' ■ ' i '^_ �u /% �� 1 I 1o�+-• J f Dec. ii i l_ �• �. (❑ • •/ • .' (• ' ,� '. i'' (, ) T E lJF � �� • / • 1 1 Revisions No. Date it ..i' I ; ❑ • .. • .. • • 1 ' � ' tag ' •� `' •—�� j �� -1' = �� sl,b5t Iont isc^ :, \ ,cam Drawing Title —�—��' ;- r.• . Q,u e` ✓,��\� %, ll l J ( ` LoCai t i o n 'Plan Win mill �� I .r ; . /4 mile radius rfil I ��V �Cem • j y�� r^' �� j ,1 1 �� ` �� +• •, ;.•,1 mile ad"iu Drawing o , � ,❑, I _ , =r _ .'� � � .� r _ ® ng �is"'sa` POO I i =_ '.� • �f �^ // .2== --' _ /\ � !ice _ —� _ I .- r.L_.1 - I L i IL I`_ 18T- J7 1-1 t r '\!" I r 1 1T-V . 1 x I I. O I ^� C1 ab❑ b a R 4 - u op o a❑ Z0LJ � _ !� � o �, , R /R o �( a ^ sWs iiro` 1 - Golf 1TSe 1 . O Z. SF R _ Rit Existx!0!n R str17 �'� JJ RIO-Mg Ingser \,atio 1• 2 xzae0 1 1. op Ign SF 3.0 •^�C% �� � � z � R N drain swele �m� .T SF A I A 1 J Williston Rd. 1.0 miles II 7�Entraice to UVM Bloressarch Complex II I University of Vermont r ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES Tribu ary of Potash Brook - •,� '' `•� 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET `� + ),l'.p' BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05405-W16 A \'IlM ' SF 1/4 mile radlua around Proposed facility _ (� 1 •. Consultants OL jVI� I j • $e pi _ iJ_ J `' GU"tTt KCrI ort } L YC4�f Gt v4. J� _1 `•1 al 8;^11• T �• - - �. Q S U R security— w., .; •• / x {a' » L ` QG �0�L= S - - ` , z y I uJj _' z New I ention Pond —I• A/ tu... Tn.I- 1�1 I I } Y L] r«. s . n.a 7p. O �r-7( M1 / y x l .. - -u �J a �• �JL - U �l \ '' A x z99.0 x Sf7.0 A ! A r� 0_ A A uC? U h 0 t � I ^ I O 0 \ I x 299.0 ,deb i x 296.0 o v o p o OP ❑ SE \ o; :' Ex t. Drainage �5 0; ' o sw�Ie /A A ° SF cc) a ❑ o � � I x2a2.0 � r� ❑a ❑ [� ao �0 I Footbaii A•a ❑ e emu.. - --- '-- �� a ❑ 0 a SE field \\� ---- - "2N 0i L �OQC3 C D D P`c Tributary of 1 IR ri:::','::;.. q�� ❑ D jp zez.o SE SE Potash Brook �R-] x ! i �U('"� ClQ e• ❑ n 1 L 1 � ,2U/ �7 1 � IMeD 2e40 _ x 274 a -��ri x 28, 61-0 2p.0 r 26200 11a 1 J w -� ✓z7s zee.o r 1 l I C =zno 1 1 219.0. t j (�___---- = 2, +1 Iw-iN k , - 11BLO ' l I I r� .r v 1.� or ••.••t _,_,_ ruts _ 1.r .. Lam.- "• NORTH YAO11Y.. _L . 1•atl. .Y1...q • U....a.a Q ...« n" O w•rw� t•1r • ■mat a►a Rf G8 7w0 v.T v rwt ",..... _ _ ._ . _. ">C..• _ _ '�._flTr1,V"_\tQ.".L L..'.L6TI L:[I.__ n A N A. .375 miles -�" to Interchange • with I-189 Swift St..75 miles LAND USE LEGEND R - Recreational & Athletic SE - Secondary Education SF - Single Family Residence MF - Multi -family Residence A - Agricultural L - Leased land -UVM owned IR - Institutional Research C - Commercial/Office 0 200 400 600 800 1000 contour Interval: 5 foot Project University of Vermont Proposed Environmental " Safety Facility - Project No. Scale 1"■ 200' Drawn by JRP Checked by KCB Date Dec. 27,1988 Revisions —� No. Date Drawing Title Proposed Site Plan Drawing No. 3 � � / � / ,. � / / / . � .. ' / .. \. . 0 - Ly cnl•.pu cvT <,C-UFnI: f-F <nem[w Tplan {o{{les rvewr tIo•r'a Iroew ..pore, .rl( b, aryl (nr1 a m..Nrt• r•r v/ prarn.n (ia•rr Iwrl wd.w! Im•z. vinle. mN Mep'enrl 2 rub, .vrda+ p.ru 0 lopnta Ip ,un •er 2 conmlvrn d PH p.d•r 2 nanG{ho 2 hard n,o 2 I•••I -9' •Im 10 Ty G[em_I,-r suuw 1—. 7rach ,•.N•rw ..17 d• au(wM f pmr •/ bparl Iof ,0 IC. bap of Sp••al Dr[ I 00 Io. �•{ d .oa.•m owoonan 2 Doom• 2 dn., ouu t m•rcar� .•caam Ist1u0� ,,plmina moonlit .wd HErA rill., 2 A-11- 1'J lit.•! cbl,'9raO1Nn. Cap 1 I+and vumin eJ-Suto� o••,s.ct atom t Itu[ of L• falla�m{ rvp. d drvmc JS tallpn ,[NI open -need SS t•i c:o•ea-lino 33 {uloa pol•prop,�en• clo••d-n•.d 70 Iulon 00"tov,lep. closed-ne•d 16 talon m+[rv[oorlen• awn -had IS talon pol•p,00rlan• c:med-nr.d F-,'�. L—J�i I N�.d.11 �{ � K '- t{ e•GV L.t- hM I A6.:aoK_ r�K'f CJIMN /pL ^�'2` 6.cr+E-ICt� 1>tRfr•foe fr2 6Lr4-1• t brlJt7 ts•.�zr<*IGY �n rkC w.lri.l t• Jl_ ll�I�!•tt� C J.RLININ4 MAYS ra..cnlrY N�-E+,r<K'� �R rr-.+cc.. Ics�r<��•�-I T tiLYr3� JIJM L---TIc tJ (—TH Ir"T[rR��/h S MLL bT p(IUht I {� t'rf I rwr IntiINGL114�iMR L��..r1o.-7 <rYrt I) b hr7 rp� 2) _ -a•ty I 1 1 I .✓<e e' I ✓p' d'(s' I I d' s►-s_L es+r� t�' r]'rj .I.,•li r.• e�ey(T". r�li r„'.r`N —G �' wl rw2 l :,' 1. IYti, +' Iwo 1 5 S r Iv•1 !'� U4 v -atlassr ' tly9 •i► 1!•�"r'{' RI bt (gas •u),�S +r _ Llws ,Gas 7.l, pns sr>I Ins}rr IE�s sr -T I \ e i I I [v 1 I lI (s[s X) -.,FT—, III 4�- la r •l', z4�'i tsa �� nu.crr�c rwLua nu.�c <9S'. ) I •7 � _', l �] r I { -2 - �; _---- - - -- - -� �� 1 17 1 _ Kkc r.rcN. w ly + I I i I —T es J .0 t.R I I ^. A I 4I tLtrN.,Y1J4 •✓e.LL � �f J�YNu[,o I I S C( ki}C. IC4t. I fl RI I?ut�as Ilb b 1 0 L L:- j--j Universitv of Vermont ARCHITECTURAL d ENGINEERING SERVICES 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT C6405-0015 (802) 656.3291 Consultants Project Project No. Scale y,; • -�" Drawn by �nr� Checked by Date Revisions No. Date Drawing Title Drawing No. 5 --"IKI-- Dn = I Es+�i L'-lr�/si�UN / •Ib° NvR7H etwdt�v�l University of Vermont ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05405-0016 (8M) 656•3291 Consultants Project UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT Proposed Environmental Safety Facility Project No. Scale Drawn by ti Checked by Date Revisions No. Date Drawing Title •r'LW-1.'sjic-4+A7 Drawing No. �vtr eK.ry Ic.�N YW • illy 7 Project Narrative UVM Environmental Safety Facility 667 Spear Street Burlington, Vermont Where will the Environmental Safety Facility be located? The Environmental Safety Facility (ESF) will be located in the City of Burlington at the UVM BioResearch Complex, approximately one mile south of the Athletic Facilities Complex on the west side of Spear Street. This location combines a number of advantages including close proximity to campus, relative isolation, good screening from neighbors, and no adjacent residential housing. The closest residences are approximately 1 /4 mile away. What is the appearance and function of the facility? The ESF will be a one -level building, approximately 8300 square feet with a 700 square foot storage mezzanine, and will consist of hazardous waste management offices, a testing laboratory, chemical waste storage areas, an enclosed loading dock, a virgin and recycled chemical distribution center, and a work area with a walk-in fumehood and a ventilated pouring station. The facility will be constructed of an earth -tone textured block, and will have a metal standing seam roof. The purpose of the facility is to house a chemical distribution and resource recovery center and the storage and management of hazardous wastes. Will South Burlington be affected by this project? The ESF site is located in Burlington but will be accessed by Spear Street which is in South Burlington. The facility would tie into the South Burlington sewer system if the budget will allow. UVM has done a preliminary review of the project with South Burlington with regard to traffic, sewer and emergency response, and will continue to work with South Burlington and Burlington to coordinate the project. Page 1 Why is the University building the Environmental Safety Facility (ESF)? Legal reasons for the ESF 1. RCRA and the need to store chemical waste more than ninety (90) days The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) allows large quantity generators of hazardous waste such as UVM to store hazardous wastes for no longer than 90 days, unless specially permitted for long-term storage. In 1988, the University received a Notice of Violation from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for exceeding this time limit when a change in EPA regulations made it suddenly impossible to ship the waste to its intended disposal facility. After evaluating current and long-term needs, the University determined that a facility which would provide adequate space and equipment to allow for the management and storage of chemical waste beyond 90 days was needed. The University applied for and was granted a "Part B" facility permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, based on the design of the ESF. 2. ACT 100 - Vermont's Waste Minimization and Toxic Use Reduction Law The 1991 Vermont Legislature passed a law which will require large quantity generators of hazardous wastes such as UVM to develop a plan to reduce the generation of hazardous wastes and the use of hazardous materials wherever feasible. As research has increased on campus, the amount of hazardous materials used as well as the amount of hazardous waste generated has increased, making it difficult for UVM to comply with this law given its present chemical storage and handling capabilities. The ESF will provide the space necessary to safely initiate waste consolidation measures, such as commingling and bulking (mixing similar chemicals and concentrating wastes for the purpose of reducing volumes), to implement waste minimization strategies, such as recycling (reuse of chemicals which would otherwise be wastes), and to conduct treatment techniques to render hazardous wastes non -hazardous or less hazardous. These are the primary hazardous waste minimization techniques which have been identified as being applicable in university settings. Page 2 The ESF will also serve as a virgin and "preowned" chemical distribution center and will be managed to allow UVM to control chemical inventories in a central location. The University will be able to institute a system which will provide information on what is being purchased, what products are on hand, how much of each is present, when stock is outdated, what should be disposed of and how much new stock should be ordered. In this way, UVM can institute an effective toxics reduction program by distributing only the amount of chemical needed, and eliminating the storage and ultimate disposal of unwanted surplus chemicals. Environmental Safety and Health Reasons for the ESF As stated above, the ESF will allow the University to establish an aggressive waste minimization strategy by instituting centralized purchasing of chemicals and "preowned" chemical redistribution. In addition, it is prudent from the standpoint of emergency response to move excess chemicals currently stored in laboratories and storage areas to the ESF, which is specifically designed for the management and storage of chemicals. Unwanted surplus chemicals can cause safety problems. The ESF will provide centralized, safe storage for hazardous chemicals which are currently stored in most campus buildings. Economic Reasons for the ESF The majority of UVM's hazardous waste is currently packaged and transported off - site in containers called labpacks. A labpack is a waste drum filled with laboratory chemicals in their containers packaged with sufficient absorbent material to absorb any liquid released from broken or leaking internal containers. A 55-gallon labpack drum contains approximately 15-gallons of chemical waste. The ESF has been designed with a "pouring station" which will allow UVM to consolidate a significant amount of its wastes into bulk drums, allowing considerable waste disposal cost savings. The ESF will also provide UVM the means by which to store and redistribute some of the chemicals which would now be disposed of as waste. Furthermore, since the cost of disposal of unused hazardous chemicals exceeds the savings of buying in large quantities, UVM will save money through the chemical distribution center by controlling the purchase of bulk chemicals which eventually become hazardous wastes. Page 3 What other options has the University considered? The University looked into four options before concentrating solely on permitting and building the ESF: 1. UVM considered the existing available space on campus for hazardous waste storage. No suitable unused space could be found on campus to meet the University's hazardous waste needs and the regulatory requirements for long-term hazardous waste storage. 2. UVM looked into the possibility of sharing the existing IBM facility. In November, 1988, UVM contacted IBM regarding the shared use of IBM's hazardous waste storage facility. IBM maintained that they did not have the available space and that neither their permit nor their corporate policy would allow them to take UVM's waste. 3. UVM considered the possibility of contracting with Pollution Solutions of Vermont (PSOV). UVM determined that PSOV did not have the capacity to handle the volume and myriad of wastes generated in research. PSOV's permit limitations prevented further discussion. 4. UVM considered the possibility of having an independent hazardous waste firm build, own, and operate a facility on UVM's property. This option was not viable for of a number of reasons including: *Contractors were not interested in building a facility unless UVM financed construction of the building and they were allowed to take wastes from other generators in addition to UVM. *No other colleges or universities use this approach due to the liablilties involved. for it. •UVM would lose control over its hazardous waste, but would remain liable •It would be hard to terminate a contract of this sort and UVM would lose flexibility How does the University currently handle chemicals? Chemicals used at the University are currently purchased by individual departments directly from a supplier. Because of budget cycle considerations and Page 4 favorable unit pricing from suppliers for bulk chemicals, chemicals are often purchased in excess of current need and stored for long periods, in order to insure a ready supply of chemicals for individual researchers. Unfortunately, many chemicals deteriorate in storage and must be disposed of without having been used. Space is also very limited in most laboratories and storage of flammable and reactive chemicals presents a significant potential hazard. After chemicals have been used or are no longer needed, they are held in the laboratory or one of four temporary waste storage areas on campus for up to two months until the next hazardous waste pick-up is organized by the Risk Management Department. Many chemicals received by the Risk Management Department for disposal are still usable for many purposes. The Department publicizes the availability of such chemicals to the labs on campus and distributes them to UVM employees upon request. However, because of limited storage space, these chemicals often cannot be set aside long enough for a need for the chemical to arise on campus. Thus, many useful chemicals are disposed of as hazardous waste. Managing this flow of material in a safe and cost effective manner requires a specially constructed building such as the ESF. What risks are there with regard to chemical storage? The majority of chemicals that will be stored at the ESF will be organic solvents, waste oils, acids, other organic materials and alkalis. These chemicals are similar to materials found in many households - things such as lighter fluid, nail polish remover, automotive products and cleaners. However the quantity of chemicals to be stored and the small amounts of exotic chemical waste produced on campus require a facility specifically designed to contain them safely. The ESF was designed to minimize hazards to the greatest extent possible including the following safety features: • sprinklers throughout the building; • containment sumps and dikes designed to keep all of the material within the storage room in case of a leak or spill; -leak detection system in all storage areas; • separate storage areas for solvents, corrosives, toxics, reactives, and explosives; • fire detection system throughout the building; • external access to all storage rooms; and *extensive written waste handling, training, and management procedures. Page 5 Will the University take others' wastes? In addition to the wastes generated from UVM's activities, the ESF Part B Permit allows the University to accept waste from the following generators: -City of Burlington household hazardous waste collection activities: •Chittenden County Solid Waste District household hazardous waste collection activities; and Primary and secondary educational activities At the present time, no arrangements have been negotiated to take wastes from these generators. How will the facility be managed? The ESF will be managed by the Risk Management Department with weekly technical assistance from an outside waste management firm. The UVM staff will include a Hazardous Waste Manager (currently on staff), and a Hazardous Waste Technician (position vacant, but in base -budget). UVM will contract with a waste management firm to provide two chemists on a weekly basis to package, decant, analyze, transport, and dispose of the hazardous wastes at EPA approved treatment and disposal facilities. jet -Line Services Inc. of Williston Vermont will be on 24 hour call for response to any chemical emergency at the facility. What is the capacity of the facility? The maximum amount of hazardous waste which can be stored at the ESF can not exceed two hundred (200) 55-gallon drums, or its equivalent. Under current plans, the University would accumulate wastes for 180 days before removing approximately 80 drums (one semi -tractor -trailer truck load). UVM Department of Risk Management 2/12/92 Page 6 .c T/ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 0 June 19, 1992 Ms. Gail Shampnois UVM Office of Government Relations 86 South Williams Street Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Environmental Safety Facility, 667 Spear Street Dear Ms. Shampnois: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 23, 1992 at 7:30 PM to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cere y, ?oe-.Cleith City Planner JW/peh 4) UVM ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY FACILITY Representatives from UVM will present proposed plans for an environmental safety facility. The facility will be located at the BioResearch Complex off Spear Street. This complex is located in the City of Burlington near the South Burlington city line. The meeting is informational only and will provide an opportunity for officials and residents of South Burlington to comment on the project. Enclosed is a project narrative which explains the facility's location, impact on South Burlington, appearance, purpose and function, safety risks, management and capacity. UVM has been meeting for more than a year with South Burlington officials and neighboring residences regarding this facility. Several neighborhood information meetings were held with residents of Meadowbrook Condominiums and Spear Street residences. Issues of particular interest to South Burlington include emergency response, traffic on Spear street, sewer service, and impact on nearby residences. The facility will need to comply with all laws regarding safety and emergency response. The City has asked for a written procedure for emergency response, both on -site and off -site. Traffic to and from the facility will be relatively light. Only Spear Street north of the complex entrance will be used for access to the site. There will be approximately 2-3 trips a day by a 10,000 lbs. truck delivering material from UVM. A tractor trailer will visit the site about 1-2 times a month for transport of the stored material at the facility to a registered landfill or storage area. The facility will be located about 1000 feet from the nearest condo at Meadowbrook, and therefore should not have an adverse impact on this neighborhood. 6y March 3, 1992 Peter & Sylvia Tousley 112 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Neighbor: In March of 1991, we sent you information and invited you to attend an informational meet- ing about the proposed UVM Environmental Safety Facility (ESF), to be located at the University's Bio-research Complex (on the west side of Spear Street) in the City of Burlington. The purpose of the facility is to house a chemical distribution and resource recovery center and the storage and management of hazardous wastes . On May 8, 1991, the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation held a public hearing on the project and has issued the University a Part B Permit that will allow the University to construct and operate the facility. The University has begun the City of Burlington permit process; a hearing with the Zoning Board is scheduled for March 23, 1992, at 4:00 p.m. A copy of the permit application is on file at the City of Burlington Planning Office and a copy of the Project Narrative and a set of drawings is on file with Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Planner at the South Burlington Municipal offices on Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 656-8627 or write me at 86 South Williams Street, Burlington, VT 05405. Sincerely, Gail Shampnois UVM Government Relations Liaison GS/ jeh cc: J. Weith C. Hafter B. Cimonetti neighborsesf.kcb James & Carol LaPlante 495 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Clement & Arlene Couillard 590 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Reginald & Rose Hebert 596 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gladys Ayers 696 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Frank & Ingrid Sprenz 700 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 George & Gertrude Crooks 74 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ralph & Lisa Fernandez 82 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Alexander & Barbara Rippa 88 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Gerald & Patricia DiVincenzo 96 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 JoAnn Nielson 100 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Garth & Clara Peterson 106 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Peter & Sylvia Tousley 112 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Albert & Ruth Reynolds 126 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Armin & Norma Grams 134 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Clarence & Mildred Hill 140 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ronald & Radetta Nemcosky 148 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 James & JoAnn Canning 156 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ronan Belisle & Marianne Blanchard 168 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Kenneth & Ellen Gillies 170 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Mitchell & Sonja Ann Hinsdale 184 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Fred & Patricia Cianci 188 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Robert Pond 210 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 George Passage, Jr. 220 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dieter & Valerie Gump 226 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Jan & Mary Rozendaal 233 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Orr 234 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Peter & Pamela Linton 237 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dennis & Maria Lambert 238 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 James & Mary Benson 250 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Fred & Barbara Laing 256 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Howard Bank Trustee Louise Raynor Box 409 Burlington, VT 05401 Michael Julow 280 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 William & Ellen Dorsch 290 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Robin Lash 300 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Stanislaw Staron 310 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Stephen & Susan Elliott 320 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dennis & Carol Lutz 326 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Frederic & Shirley Sargent 330 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Andrew Devost 340 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Leonie Nelson 366 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Jack Stanton, President Unit D-6 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Edward & Barbara Worcester 935 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Reginald & Kathryn Cram 936 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Everett & Doris Bailey 944 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Per & Lena Renstrom 955 South Prospect Street South Burlington, VT 05403 M BURLINGTON PLANNING CO 135 CHURCH STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05 Telephone 802/658-9300 802/658-9300 802/658-5140 F.Y.I. To: From: Return ❑ Keep or Recycle l3" Pose iY" F.Y.I. pad 7668 0 ' p Adm.inistr;, s Ex,litses ` t-,rv.i :. BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Public Hearing - March 23, 1992 The Burlington Zoning Board of `-djustment .ill hold a public hearing on Monday, March 23rd at 4:00 p.m. in Contois Auditorium in Citv mall to con- sider the following applications under the cited sections of Appendix A. Burlington Code of Ordinances: 1. (CU-92-054): The request of University of Vermont for conditional use approval to construct and operate an environmental safety facility located at 667 Spear Street in the UC Zone in accordance with Section 11 (B). 2. (HO-92-055): The request of Virginia Randall for conditional use approval to establish a photography office as a home occupation located at 145 Robinson Par!;way in the R6 done in accordance with Sections 6 (2) (f) and 27. Plans may he reviewed in the Burlington Planning and. Zoning Office, 135 Church Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Marl: T. Eldridge;- Director of Planning & Zoning For more information or information regarding handicapped accessibility, call 658-9300, Ext. 155 (658-9300 TDD). loi2M 1 Printed on Recycled Paper 11010f 3.1 •IN O F•O �akeview �.: a��O �� �. - i t _ �� 1 �s` - II— �� v LJ- �"\�' '� C J • �I LS. t : '� I ' ` - 1 C AC C� it_- _Ji==1�' i ._ •t '�I %� wt/ ��� • C' `il cif ii _ �j- �'(_ �'- U �/ __— • 2ao-1` ---t33 L.�I _�� Lime_PIh^ \ OrphansTome / Qu hi' '' _ „ by 1 a one Rock PointP. ,\ a 0o I D', `� 1`LiQ ��,.��a: r .a� I /� •—� Sta`Zil•�.�.,�� • Q LIU :P`f I%_ r 1:. ''• 4927 Gas • a� ❑❑❑ d �\ % 1 \'�\\ '^.-�`-j/J� %� Tanksir � cn �,. � \��: •�'Si` 1 /4i` �i f � ' r I arries /� \ I� `'�/ • lam•{ I{ �' / I sair, Cil- Beac �- \ a� .��L. .. - � LL �i• P�D'IlCeranraount����;.� \ �=® � I >1�• on Light ��3pital Chy z •sue-f i GaW Tanks �, ■« 0. ���: •� ��^, i / c���G�� <1� _ A ■ Aurt cy a0. / •� ■■ WT l 4926 � � ion to C � ,� ITEd on % •� ''� •�� 1 Ilw ••�_ .--_,••.. � '...rt BU NGTO - ! \ IN 1 Hi�ti Sch �' .:ResATIO A • • � • � 7�, .'.)`� / / • • • �- - •,� ; j� LHI _ __ O Coy CY l l III i• ,,��L �.- C . r• �� IRTE h4 • Beacon Light _. `t I �•' er• B l �'I \ ^�y, y j •' I . I1�. �.� • • II ��.J W awM Mih r I '� � .I i � 1 � r-r . r _ / I � t y ...'� t ; , �. • •„• 49i5 Q" amrte 1 ■ (( �• • '' i I ' :I• ) �/ •`j ti fi' ;• - �• �. ..Quarry :/ • . \ %rlingt ■ l ; ` I: //I \ • Burlington Country G� I / �i/ ).. 1�••• I• Sc mni ��o by r■ ' a I i ' �, : �" I ',�-. �;. �. i-. i -- ��`�i � \ Jn L • �.�., • z i. ' _�� =' X" —'; Ban. j ; ___,�. - ✓ \. I \ .....• � Pa k.�'�•'� \ � • . �' �a;a +�o� � I - � . ` Cem-� � . �; -� 1, • •>a>a>a• � I � � ' \ ri'`_ 4- T., 1„-; ,i�l � .�• � N .� ' ':c�' • 'T.� •' •!I ." I �; Via-' asIf �nfa \•M �•a• y _ / , �� ;. l \.r • j.. 1:� 143 w Oak Le,g '! �•� a • .�./ �u r �� 1 III I I �-_- oao • / dr ;/• •�I � .�••� ' �i / � �^._ ,-��' �; -fit tt �ii='�t \ I 23 H��(/ V�3OQ (((1)l Subst io 1$G • '� 7 I 1� ' y� .guar. - n, • �• R ! .% e fit =P Shelburne Point /'� � � I' �� /� (�^� ' •sU-'� �Wcjmill • / • �.. G-,i _ 4 mil radius -- in-\ ' 22 �i �l) �j IN Q V A v /iAf •� _j �� t�l^ u OD ^ J� •. G ,�1 University of Vermont IF \ ARGIfITECTUnAL & ENG1NEEnING SERVICES 109 SOUI I I PnOSPEC r STIIEET DIMUNGTON, VEnMoNr os•IOs•0016 �. J002) 056-9291 Project Proposed Environmental* ❑., Safety • Facility Proiect No. E►-iSF i�eOZeo Scale (`t = Zc.t':r=, FT. ' Drawn by J R P Checked by KCB .Date Dec. 27,1988 Revisions , O No. Date Drawing Title / I Loca't ion Plan l Drawing ® No. •-• LJ •22.0 1 i d� J ( O R E —a L 1 ,a .14000 1 Golf tTSe �. R u Q 0,1 SF Q R .:lw 11 n SF Q , - _ zsa _G _ ExistiJr g4 rear aim op i9 1 (l q SF \, :. i f try \ R N drain sw le 511 z C�lV •• L pie _ 7G L $ V R 6 security, c, .e .., . - Op New \ lion Pond �• t]o1Z t- I 296.0 0 10 - � Of tash rook i-z������/, �!�■ gal . - ■ 111010 OVA 'r41*WPPw_ tWa ' ,+ y' iR ' �� �. Ir- d• ]_S FM[ ..—.- IPa[ o •aai O O.O at• � • _� WM T/1/.M �.. - • �^ -_ _ or-0 ••.e _L/ ••ll i.. •.A sa e. r �TO.O 10KINx � OL1101. ® + TYwS l//I �... OIT 171a «TG�,•M v Mws •' • wr. • rrc�t Rf1GC t� mama . D .a. /■O owap SF A �Wlllidton Rd. 1.0 miles wl Entrance to UVM Bloresearch Complex ' _ University of Vermont t ' Sig ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES o+v c �. 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET i \ Tribu ary of Potash Brook BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05405-0016 R \ r� w� SF I 1/4 mile radius around _ proposed facility Consultants 6V-1Te,-rV oft iMe M,;" •bl od. A L A , / !o'q I / A 375 miles ��- to Interchange with I-189 Swift St..75 miles LAND USE LEGEND R - Recreational & Athletic SE - Secondary Education SF - Single Family Residence MF - Multi -family Residence A - Agricultural L - Leased land -UVM owned IR - Institutional Research C - Commercial/Office 0 2001 400 600 800 1000 contour Interval: 5 foot Project University of Vermont Proposed Environmental Safety Facility- ` Project No. Scale 1•.200' Drawn by JRP Checked by KCB Date Dec. 27,1988 Revisions No. Date I I.A.AJ Drawing Title Proposed Site Plan Drawing No. 3 Attachment 3 c,u� G 11 t°un• �,• �==-=-=---=------------- --- '=' • ! / / ..�. ^t Lne« °u,.. ,,Gin° .1n, may«.,_ et, Aa EXISTOP ,1 lAGE �( ANIMAL' FACII C ulUiP(IOPGSEO, ej 1 �11 --�•a /':— eus nHc °•nN { � / - • _ may,.. \ � - \ \ s . � �/ I \� NGnw• J \ �\ I I � • I 1 11 i IJ i I \ � � ... �„� .1 {•uN .G,I nt r / ,4, I'_ _ s 6 C University of Vermont All NICIlMl 11M OVAGd. Ln:pS 1°r sunn rxuslsu slyn swwcla ♦tAlrwl a..nslr 1►:Iry LVI I,nWutlly Of Vnmonl ►.•ps•N EnrN°nin•nIN SAI.1, /••nllp t- PwyoS°d Stu Plan cnem,�al tpaa sotpea �ewr serer ,•ot. nnerewr �n Dr n:„rret • cv.trirt• rn e/ oa.er,.r r;r .r,usur ,u,r:. cure,•. r„i +reo...vl S rubb.r norm 2 p,u 10 eoont•a 10 swtr,• •.dt 2 w nen d ➢H ppr 2 ""With" 2 had I, 2 f•r•, 'H' ays t0 T— twa chea,Wlr-reau•• boon 4—A rnrMrr•• w1f b. •tnt.•. I par e/ boar) IQ SO ID. bap of So• , Dr, 1 I00 ID. b•6 of sodium b,arboern I Droom• I a.•t pN I m•rcrn .-co.m - lmiI 110— bronfln{ and HEfw nlnr 2 wows. 20 hear- po/rTOOr4e• bats 2 bond oumoa I b1-Salbe o.erDack dram al lent t,•o d ,f,a (olio-,n{ M1Dea of d-- Sf tallw au.1 own -need :-1-nnd Sf talon p-Ir9rooYlen• clot•d-h•ad 30 {alba ,pr•p,oDYlena clo,ed-head 16 talon pw•vroorlena opn-nad IS talon p ,•0— lent doted -nerd f-1f4Y'?Ihl�7f{MR•' F{CPUL.t' 1•lv. C.i-r.�•�r7� I P��• UVr"lonl M I "le•-•"d�� t�rLY cHr�lu.� r--r' Geri tiC2aL plvlrTfir ' rr 2 6Lr4-1- v Pvc r-1✓r►L rRry L e, �i'!'/Nb[-11 G•v�i�iC�RIG�N L�+:ace,�GY ��•R Ke jc..6as•,t a5Y>,,.-lcy_K✓rl7 araay. cu+14NIN /� yyyc� e^�N-+ice-X1' r+-fi 4.r".1�4- RJe-dr �® Yi I.cusTIJN (--^TN IPIfML.GU�h r,�t-fir le•.r{ h•14N 10o1 27{Ff t.cT SRC `-'ir�c'Kis � f♦Mti)-v"^iRY Rsayl LLLQ r� Ie-kfINGJ151�1e{L LUGbTIt�•-/CT7 t'E- 1� (r.7,1�1 r'rv] r�Y-jlPl(�.JI. L�L�ri 1rX�CTYt'�' 2) Iyr..acrucr I I � _ _ — _ --� I� t l i F� r�'•td+' n e6r I &6 ti l tk' is I �• .• I I I I I I r I L-r ' ---+ r.- ?"` ,_ �_n_ r r`ar-I a' y`n' I �' b►-s � ,a`a ! '��' a`a' I ,,,•..•I n' -- I lul ,lux 11 1� ��> 1-4 S �S r.' (t'-��—'', 1.� T �aruK �,l.. J h•rr.>Rr ��"_u'S,__. ''t"p.✓<`'`{^"! M1 J a„q 5_- (rw•. ✓Ga. LK Gnu x _ dd. -+•tr. (J e,4. {las 'sr5 ,�7 ...• ( -� I © i ® ,� ® iCas•x1 uns5r31 lta� r: Iran...t cl»s5r 7.l u RI � I I .+.Tr+R.GY .•.1rtMN !'I��iSlb ytJ / la hr• ' .j.�-i r^lh •lYHJ �r� �. 1`✓W+,jI � I _ ------ ® �. ITr�Z- r•.c I9 i lri - crN.M1+i Ju - ll�A� �µ11 d II4 v art I - 0-sr) i i M1i T i.4�'" - ,ram _ _- �r �x�• o Jam' ri,UFi ,i �~ C 0 Universitv of Vermont ARCHITECTURAL d ENGINEERING SERVICES 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET 8URLINGTON. VERMONT O6405-0016 I= 656.3291 Consultants Project Project No. Scale Drawn by env Checked by Date Revisions No. Date Drawing Title Drawing No. 5 Eo�T fiy./,yjl r�N ' Ytl I�c.Y TY�r. � is ux Ts,�.u�wre�ir NURTH KryA11Ut-1 University of Vermont ARCHITECTURAL d ENGINEERING SERVICES 109 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05405-0016 (802) 656-0291 Consultants Project UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT Proposed Environmental Safety Facility Project No. Scale Drawn by Checked by Date Revisions No. Date Drawing Title Drawing No- 7 5k�� ST ?REAT� l . CEoR6E � Ge"6& cfto-.S S��R sT Sa, 6gR4_ 65-(/63 �o� S i�FAR So. �Su6f�. b5,ve) 3 AL"00 4 OSV 4 3 �5e-gkb � 4m/C/4 PFA� 6T bu �Z, . 6 sV3 Pi I%iA1ceNzo po So. v5 q03 Tousz-el 4 S?BAR 6T Sa. &�&, D 5-�D,J 4L&W � �&* �w� 46 15-77 Sa, bZ(xc., oy m D oAEE s #Aj 4)6Rk,4� So. C L48c-Az5- � MOReD #144., lyb Sl�-� 57` 600 j 4D e7P4 A)� COSKX VE49 6F. S�. &qz,, ti 3Y8 156 S4iR 677- So, Aql- o 5,P3 l3 WONO Sr, Z,1s46 0 Rliwoc. Bzoc�IV I G S PEAR �%- � i�, KE-(W-7-1��PJLC-V6I« 1 e.s 5?F4R sT 5�. 6Y�L . 06Vd S64j-A ,40 f m PALE 5?FAR 57— S D. 6 qRL . 03VL) 3 i 9_ 7 J�4w1�s 4 CARo� LA P�iA) 67— U 5-V%2 �6WT PoAjb AID SPFR� ST Sa_ AkRL, 6514 I 6 Eo)V6E sT- �iErER V4Lr-R1E GCrMp JN 4 M-1�'f DZ EMMAL, a3 3 �?W 6T S�. &g . �Vh3 �07,, aE7�' M , 099 ZV 3PAq� 5T 50. kqL, a5 ve�3 TES � Akk?r--�A LPTOd �3S ?qR s7— �3 �i,4RrA �44,ibFRT- �T 5 �,vws 1 W� 6Eti,-IPV rw � MOM Z-/Og AS667- AWAnD 6*)K TPSTF� Louise A_ �AY/W d�dx yoq 4u�C��acraA, PtQ s P�49 57- a�- �t,44 1441 4 FAA) 30- �564 4- �p� 3/. sTol"-z- o ) 51-4 pA1 Sb . d 5zlo 3�- { 54154A) FLL 17 777.. �.Ej�)c � 5�fig� *��A�7- 5 7— Ar Sc z�y Gam.+ VYN 719A F-Ft C f2e rNl vV.M wash In C� =r-ww- Nuo (I;tv Vwxf cam• 04a" t LA L tk%4.- sbo ;CX- yr — � 1 Bch � �- � � �� � .�/��,r,,�;4 �•-�+ / Gyisc . �o 0i®*,-'iVr, �ly� �5-Po R�Ts� Z ' 72 -Tr&i .4 FXfi yn V Ipl 1 D10©o -Iru&k aAli oewo V4 L- CA- r*l , 1 ��rn Aw&� r 5� S SCHEDULE F Certification of Service You are required by Section 6084 of 10 V.S.A. to send notice and a copy of your application to the municipality, the municipal and regional planning commission in which the land is located and any adjacent Vemont municipality, municipal or regional planning commission if the land is located on a boundary on or before the date of filing your application with the district commission. In order to verify that the statutory parties to the application have received copies of the application and thus avoid delay caused by improper distribution of the application, have a represen— tive of the parties sign this form when they receive the application. You may, ,,.n the alternative, send copies of the notice and application by Certified U.S. Mail and list the names below. Applicant(s) Name: The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College Environmental Safety Facility Project IOth undersigned, ant(s). J for ` h 4 electmen, a -To --- tl!':e��nj pal p have received a copy of an Act 250 application for the above 1,4e7en, or trustees (Burlington) date sion (Burlington) for`the regional planning commission (Chittenden County) date S 2— date for an adjacent municipality 'f any* (S. Burlington) date for an adjacent planning commis3sion, if any* (S. Burlington) date _Not Applicable h1A for an adjacent regional planning commission, date if any* I hereby certify that I have forwarded a complete copy of this application to each of the parties entit/leed to notice pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 6084. A/) Lin a Seavey or t e Un' ersity of Vermont Date * Attach additional sheets if more than one town is adjacent to the project lands. 3/89 : SCHEDF.DOC M BURLINGTON SCHOOLS August 28, 1992 Kenneth C. Bean Associate Architect Architectural and Engineering Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, Vermont 05405-0016 Re: UVM Environmental Safety Facility Dear Mr. Bean; RECEIVED S � P 1 1992 Architectural & Engineering Services The Burlington Public Schools only assess an impact fee for residential construction. Please be advised that there will be no impact upon the capacity of the Burlington Schools to accommodate this facility. Sincerely, ce C. Chattman c: Impact File Bruce C. Chattman 150 Colchester Avenue Assistant Superintendent of Schools (802) 864-8474 Burlington, Vermont 05401 ACT 250 MUNICIPAL IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE Applicant to Complete: Applicant Name The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College Municipality City of Burlington Title and Date of Site Plan Reviewed UVM Environmental Safety Facility Site Plan, 8/13/92 Town Manager, Department Heads, or Equivalent to Complete: a. Does the municipality have the capacity to provide the following services without unreasonable burdens for the above project: Fire Protection? Yes or Ao? Police Protection? v Yes or No? Rescue Service? ::4:es or No? -- NA - by UVM Solid Waste Disposal? or No? Road Maintenance? _,,Yes _,ZYes or No? -- NA - by UVM b. If "no", what are the deficiencies? /-�G�,aj�{[�cM l�lr.�i<c,t i o�.Q .t�i� P �'��-e��^-✓)�--�.,..'� iS .�cl�.�'µ-r C. If the service is unavailable from the municipality, who provides the service so that the town doesn't have to? d. Would the deficiencies occur without this project? _Yes or XNo? If "no", wha measures can the applicant take to alleviate the deficiencies? e. If the deficiencies are common to many projects, does this project create burdens which are disproportionate to the taxes and user fees to be paid to the municipality? _Yes or _No? If "yes", does the municipality recommend the imposition of an impact fee or other means to mitigate any unreasonable burd��}}s? / L r�e't GllLl�t sr�d� I certify that the above information knowledge. is true and accur a to the best of my N e' Posit Date Are you available, after sufficient not' , to answer questions related to the above statements at an Act 250 hearing? Yes or No? 3/89 : MUNQUES.DOC GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • BOX 850 • SO. BURLINGTON, VT 05402 • (802) 864-5731 September 10, 1992 RECEIVED Mr. Kenneth C. Bean SEP 17 1992 The University of Vermont 109 South Prospect Street Architectural & Engineering Services Burlington, VT 05405-0016 Dear Mr. Bean: We have reviewed your letter of August 18, 1992, which requests Green Mountain Power's ability to serve the electric load for the proposed University of Vermont Environmental Safety Facility located off Spear Street in the City of Burlington, Vermont. As you know,. our comments are required so that a meaningful assessment can be made under 10 VSA Sections 6086 (a) (9) (F) and (J). You have advised us that your proposed Environmental Safety Facility would increase the demand on our primary metering device by approximately 57 KW. This requirement can be supplied from Green Mountain Power's existing and planned generation sources. We have evaluated the transmission and the distribution system that will be used to serve your project's requirements and have determined that existing facilities are adequate for that purpose. We do not anticipate that your addition will require distribution or transmission improvements at this time or accelerate routine system improvements planned for the near future. In view of these facts, we conclude that the proposed development will not put an excessive or uneconomic demand on Green Mountain Power's facilities Details concerning service size, scheduling, costs, etc., should be discussed with R. Gamelin of the Williston Dict Office. Verb ruly y urs, C� bert C. Yung Director of Engineering RCY:tcc c c : Eng. File (LDA) J. A. Franz S. M. Thibault D. W. Grimason R. O. Gamelin State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council RECEIVED AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation S E P 2 3 1992 WATER SUPPLY DIVISION The Old Pantry Bld. Architectural & 103 South Main Street Engineering Services Waterbury, VT 05671-0403 802-241-2370 Public Water System Permit to Construct PROJECT # E-0137 WSID # 5091 PERMITTEE: University of Vermont ADDRESS: c/o Ken Bean, Associate Architect Architectural and Engineering Service 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05405 PROJECT NAME: UVM - Environmental Safety Facility, Spear St. TOWN LOCATION: South Burlington, Vermont General The referenced planning documents are approved in accordance with 10 V.S.A., Chapter 56, provided that all conditions listed below are complied with and continuallv satisfied. This Construction Permit, with conditions, is granted based on a review which determined that the proposed works, if built in accordance with the approved planning documents, will conform with adopted design standards and will not constitute a public health hazard or a public health risk. The review and approval did not, however, include the structural engineering aspects of this project. Project Description The project is represented by plans and specifications prepared and submitted by Lamoureux and Stone, Consulting Engineers, last dated September 16, 1992. The project involves construction of approximately 400 LF of 12" DI Class 52, 150 LF of 6" DI Class 52, one fire hydrant and associated appurtenances. This is an extension of South Burlington Water System. When constructed this will service University of Vermont Environmental Safety Facility located in Burlington with an estimated flow of 290 gpd and fire protection with a flow of 1000+ gpm using fire hydrant and sprinkler system. Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury UVM-Env. Safety Facility Permit to Construct Page 2 September 21, 1992 The project is presented in the following: Sheet No. Drawing Date Last Revision Date S1 August 13, 1992 September 15, 1992 D2 August 13, 1992 None The total number of sheets reviewed by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for this project is two (2). Project Conditions (1) All construction on this project must be completed by and shall expire on September 30, 1994 unless written approval is obtained from the Department of Environmental Conservation which extends the expiration date. (2) This Construction Permit is not transferable or assignable and shall automatically become invalid upon a change of ownership or upon suspension or revocation.. A successor in interest to the permittee may apply to the Department of Environmental Conservation for reissuance of this permit. (A) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the project, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental laws and this permit. (B) The Department of Environmental Conservation maintains continuing jurisdiction during the life of the permit and may require the permittee periodically to file an affidavit certifying that the project is operating in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and conditions of the permit. (3) The project shall be constructed, completed, maintained, and operated in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and in accordance with the conditions of this permit. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the Department of Environmental Conservation. (4) Construction inspection shall be performed by a competent inspector under the general supervision of a professional engineer. It is the permittee's responsibility to ensure that inspection is undertaken to assure that the project is constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, plus any authorized change orders. UVM-Env. Safety Facility Permit to Construct Page 3 September 21, 1992 (5) The permittee or representative shall submit as -built Record Drawings to the Department of Environmental Conservation indicating the system as it was constructed, including any field modification. Record Drawings shall be developed by the professional engineering firm responsible for observation of construction. Record Drawings shall be submitted within 60 days of final system field approval by the responsible engineer. Prior to being placed in operation for domestic use, all new portions of the system shall be flushed, pressure tested, disinfected and flushed again. Following this procedure, at least two samples must be collected (in Vermont Department of Health sample bottles) from representative sample points and sent to the Vermont Department of Health Laboratory at 195 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401 for Bacteriological Examination of Public Water Supply and indicate on the form that it is for a new system awaiting approval (or any other Vermont Department of Health certified laboratory). Negative sample results are required before the system may be placed "on line" for drinking. Elizabeth A. McLain, Commissioner Departmen of Environ nt Conservation By Howard R. Reeves Water Systems Section Chief Water Supply Division Dated at Waterbury, VT this 21st day of September, 1992. HRR:KCK:j1 cc: South Burlington Water Department City of Burlington Fire Department Lamoureux and Stone, Consulting Engineer Marilyn Davis, Director, Public Facilities, DEC Ernest Christianson, Regional Engineer, DEC Kris Khatri, WSD/DEC, Regional Manager Robert O'Grady, Director, Environmental Health Division PID #E-0137 hr1265-0325.92 Photometric . )ata TYPE - Ai A BCD EFGH I J KL 0 &0�4414% NO I M- W- ME 0 NEEMENEEN ENEENNEEN 0 1A 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 250 W Metal Halide Type FM _� ;a_ �u W z- zi o= 3; Footcandle Values for the Following Curves A I B I C D I E I F I G H H/I I J K L 13 1 18 10 6.7 4.2 2.61.7 1.0 .67 .52 .42 .26 .17 .10 15 1 13 7.8 5.0 3.1 2.01.2 .78 .50 .39 .31 .20 .12 .08 18 1 9.2 5.4 3.5 2.2 1.4 .87 .54 .35 .27 .22 .14 .09 .05 20 1 7.4 4.4 2.8 1.8 1.1 .70 .44 .28 .22 .18 .11 .07 .04 Footcandles Per 1000 Lamp Lumens 30 1 .1 .064 .040 .025 .016 .010 .0064 .0052 0040.0025 .0016 .0010 c 0.5 ; 0.4 1 STREET SIDE - 0.3 0.2 o, HOUSE SIDE 0 1 2 3 4 5 Street Width/ Mounting Height 4 4 lUliT R FtciZ 76 Si 4LC iv- IY) For: Ar'r'�IC.? f r�= z� CGardco Lighting 2661 Alvaraco St., San Leandro, Calif. 94577 Phone 415-357-6900 0 Copyright 1977, Gardco Lighting, Inc. P026-1 OM-983 26 T `/PE FM a Sr21 r3r�Tio •1 P�)o To M I L SOIYI T,2tL GiA G-,R.9sui -rOj2, PA- 11 6i2ry S pi— 2 Sp W,47T i\,IETAL HAL1D; I=!xTUrz: AUs,;c,4 F-D T�o 5C&j a 1 3 0