Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-75-0000 - Decision - 0295 Shunpike RoadWch 41 105 Willis Wgineering Associates 2�35 Ro.,,xi 6ouch 7urlinUton, VT 05401 Dear Mr. hIllis : Fie adviced that the Scuth Eurlington Zoning Eoard of Njustment orantp? approval of your requast to strip topsoil from 3.6 acres of Your land as indicata? on a plan Nen' 1700 ae projpct #4029 dated 2-3-75. They are sHisfied with your procedures for stripping and applied no stipulations. in accordance with Peet . onint ReLulaticans yon proposal to th6 Plannin scheduled this applicat p.m. The 7ompission re Room, RW/i ion 13.50 of the louth hurain,ton are required to submit your g 'ommission. Ws office has ion for March ill 1975 at 7:30 ets in the pity hall, Conference Very truly, Fichard Ward ZoninL Administrative Officer SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTI�ENT ?findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a Variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will r��e--p-Ilresent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date 7s Appellant ti, WAiL Vote: Yes MM No Sigr� i List findings below:. 2. 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a Variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ( j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created -by the appellant; L11 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and i''i (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date .� 7 Appellant �. •�` Vote: Yes No List findings below:. 2. 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING DOA111) OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act 11. (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or Ether physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a Variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and EJ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sig List findings below:. 2. 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD Or ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act N` (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or Ether physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations i the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a Variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; El (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 0 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ET (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El Date Appe Vote List findings below:. 2. Appeal # Sign. 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act N` (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulationsthe neighborhood or district in which the property is located•,' ij (2) That because of.such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a Variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;___ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has-notbeencreated by the appellant; D (4) That the -variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjac nt property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least ' modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant ____---- Vote: Ye No I- List findings below: 2. Appeal # S i g(n_ 3