The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-81-0000 - Supplemental - 0076 Shunpike Road (2)LEUANG 76 Shunpike Road Area zoned R-4 District Section 11.00 Dimensional requirements (a) minimum frontage - 100 feet (b) minimum lot size 10,000 square feet single family and 18,000 square feet two family propose to sub divide an existing lot: lot 1, 19,530 square feet with 70 feet froi,,—Je, lot 2, 11,250 square feet with 75 feet frontage 6Q ) lYf.7 LIitrfP41 11.GI B 0!, _.i7.iUSTIX':lNT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or condltion,, including irregularit}, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograp":1ca1 or other physic-,l conditie-)ns peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b� the provisions of the zor._r..g regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the propF=rty is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property- can be developed in strict conformitywith the provisions of the zoning regulations and t :•-Lt thr authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable *,P reasonable use of the property; a (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appAllant; T (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential c?^aracter of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the ar,rrepriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be d,.;trimcntal to tr;e public welfare; and a (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent tho least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the pla.. "iopnllant Li1vwc, Vote: Yes No ID List findings below: ;70 2.0 Appeal s,g� `cam SG ) PURLINGTCN �',ONING ROAi,.D U+ ADJUST%L:NT ^indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b; the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or condition-, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the arnrcpriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and ID (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of th., plan. Appeal # Jate (I Appellant Vote: Yes A�- List findings below: 1. 2• SO. � BUR LI'NGTON ZONING BOAT: b OF ADJUMI:ENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & 1;! vr:lopmen-�. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity-, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physic,�;l conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or condition, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is there ore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; E�r (3) That such unnegiessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 9 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annrcpriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and 1?r (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of th« plan. Date. /o I rl k ;►p P^ ellant� ��..._. Vote: Yes No ID List findings below: 2. Appeal # .� Sig ci- 1-k 2 ok o G L aA-4. & &,i SC � BURLINGTON ZONING BOAF.D u? ,.DJUST;ENT ?indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there ,are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irrerularit;,�, narrowness, or shallowness of lot s:ze or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created bS the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 19 (2) That because of such physical circumstancF�s or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 4 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the van ance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair t1-ie annrepriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be dt:trimental to trie public welfare; and a (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimun variance that will afford relief and will represent the lea-' modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 4 C"- Da to lcant Vote: Yes No WQk ID List findines below: 1. 2. 3. Appeal * I r SO ) PURLINGTON ZONING BOAS{T u:; ADJUMNENT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions ge erally created b5 the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 21 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or condition:, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is there re necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the an:�ropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tr,e public welfare; and Er (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ff ;_441 Date — Appellant Vote: Yes No Lift findinaR hpinwt 1 2. Appeal # July 27, 1981 MT. . Rotert Luang 76 Shunpike Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear YT. Leuang: Be advised that the Southh Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City .Nall, Conference Dam, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, August 10, 1981 at 5:00 R.M. to consider your request for a zoning ariunce. please Nla:l to atten5 this Imeeting. ii Verb Richard Wa-rd, Zoning Administrative Officer IU/Mcg U ci 70 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant �1 ,7,!� 51fran Plk*- 12d . Sc& r I . Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. qNY • /y .1f8/ Hearing Date fA62gnatuAe"_of Appell Do not write below this line SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , at J day of week) month and date) tiZe_ to consider the following: s Appeal of -� seeking a from Section of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 0 oe, Zvi' Ft f 0 I DATE SYM REVISION RECORD IAUTH.'DR. ICK.� TOLERANCES (EXCEPT AS NOTED) DECIMAL 1 FRACTIONAL TITLE 1 ANGULAR DATE DRAWING NUMBER SCALE DRAWN BY APPROVED BY