The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZB-88-0000 - Decision - 0075 Shunpike RoadSOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning k Development. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the nei hborhood o distri��t .n which the proper/t�y's located; �J el (2) That because of such physical circumstanceior conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of t e property; //1% rti✓�-„��,�Q, ( 3 ) That such unneces ar ha �dsJyjp has rqot .be cr��ec�,, by the appellant; ,t(,L. , r'� /�L be /��. �i// (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the V essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent proper -I ^ nor be�d�tt_im nta� to_ t_je pejblic, welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification poss'ble of the zoning regulations and of the plan. App�'al ,-, ��--• Date _ Appel Ian -- Vote: Yes 1 _ _� No I_ _:� Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings t) SOUTH 1Mf?I,1 N(;TON ZONING IIUAND OI• AhJUSTMENT Findings in acCoJr- d[At (,,e with he Planning A, Development. Act (1) That there fire unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the nei hborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore nece sary to enable the reason e use of he property; '//�J�C JQA��T�W V 1JJ �I A (i71./A // /Y ( 3 ) That such unnecessa y r s,hi has r�it beeA- Freated by the appellant; % .t/� ilk �/ /�r1�/,W10, 0,._.. r (4) That the variance, if aifthorized, will not alter the / I essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or d velopment of jacent pro erty, nor be de iment 1 t e lic fare; 2W (5) That the variance, if authoriz�,/will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of tl zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date Appellant �. r Vote: Yes N Sign r Use Reverse side f'or additional findings SOUTH 1.1t)RLINGTON ZONING IIOAND OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with sect.ion 44G8 of the planning development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date ----�/ $ �------------------_ -_ Appellant Vote: Yes 1 No 1 _. _.� S gn Use Reverse side for additional findings SOU'1'If IIURI, I NGTON ZONING IIOAJlJ) ()I� AUJUS'I'MI:N'I' Findings in accordance with Sec t.ioil ')4GX oI' the l'lunnirig h Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topogr-ahical or' other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, variance that will least modif-ication the plan. if authorized, will represent the minimum afford relief and will represent the possible of the zoning regulations and of Appeal --- Da t.e _ 4 00_ - ---- ---- Appellant 'f:-_IVIVA—J Vote: Yes No I Sign side for additional Use Reverse findings SOUT11 BURL,INGTON 'ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 44(,8 of the Planning development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the Provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; L. hctJ6 JE-1 U,. p )Jr", I e-I �7tle s .� lsc ra ! / (2) 'That because of' such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessaryhardship has not been created by the a p p e l l a n t; r C (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of t h e plan. 7 ,�; !?Zak .< <V Appeal ;F Date Appellant _Z -z� /Uil,,c %A t),4a2er Vote: Yes 1 !/r No L-J -sign Use Reverse side f-or additional findings SOOT11 BURL I NG TON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 1.11;8 of, the Plriniiirig k Development Act (I) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; �J412,9duJ L'O — isr QSS `"K, 01 � Mrs, _ l >r 14J,-' TNe rjaD'l`. 5 � 14e- U v L " o .— A, -24—D 0 V A --et- (-Ans C-e — (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; _din S b+J Pled - 1 kK, ti12.(�Elc)�yt�OQ; r 1 tx ✓v a w xkiL ez-, S'T -, ND (L7 if 1 T 0-10 U ti� (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of' the plan. Appeal Date -�c�� -- -- — --- - Appellant ��Ai2SL5 Vote: Yes No L_.) Sign Use Reverse side for additional finding SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING IMAND OF ,AI)JUtiiTMF'NT Findings in accordance with Section A46X of the Planning k Development. Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the Provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;=ydw.L�rt— (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Z-v7-Z�, (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. y<;�- Appeal Date Appellant Th/ Vote: les No I_ ) Sign a Use Reverse side for additional finding_