The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0010 Shunpike Road'rif BUH LiNGTON GUN iNG BUAI: Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the PlanninE; & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; U (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Ii (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Appeal # i Da t e Appellant Vote: Yes (j No EJ Sign Li 1. 2. 3: 'Y'rif HUH LiNGTON 'LUN 1NG BOAR v ' Findings in accordance with Section 1+46P of the Planning If Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1� (2) That because of such physical' circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; L: (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; / l� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and E—� (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. E�- Appeal # Date '7�/2- 9 Appellant fdw,oa Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 1 • _� L f -k� a h� -�f 2 . --P v ', c1Yl_ J� �i�.. G.�a �1 " /J /L NJ t tlC G G+�_ %i 4x / ` G✓� 3. Yrif BUXL1NG'lON '/,ON 1NG BOAit y�' ADJ U:31','^.:."4'1 Findings In accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; jl (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1:41 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; n' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes a No Q Appeal # "'--- Sign List findings below: 1. 1,7 2. Yrif HUP LINGTUN ZONING BUAi:' 1 ' A U J U�'1't^,�,;4 ' rindings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; U (3) That such unnece sary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1— (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Z� Appellant 7Z�� Q Vote: Yes � No Q Sign _ List findings below: 2. -7 T' rif 13UH LINGTON WN 1NG BuAl:' AllJ U i l'tf:.w l' J Findings in accordance with Section 1+46f_ of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in e neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Nq (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and lip (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Da t e_��8� AppellantsE Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: i. G•ri &Yrr- l A167" "4�/J )4PI912,F�62r-> 2. 3: