The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZB-89-0000 - Supplemental - 0050 Sherry Road (2);r it 1 11 Itt il"J. I Nt; I r r'• "..c rti I NI; Itr r,\Il1I 1 It. 11'.11' I'`11 ti I f' I rr 11 rr�•.. I n ++r' r'clnnr l l.lr tit r t 1 urr l I I;Yt ref t ►rr• I'I purr i nr� � t 1) I'Ir,c t t_11Cr" it I-(- uri 1 clue phys i cri 1 c i r<:uIli s L.+rrc:es crr c�nnd 1 t, 1 crn irlcllid IIlg ir•r'cgulririt.ynn N. rirrowess, or shtrl Iownt-sti rrf lot srzc crr shape, or excel>Li0nitI Lopogr•lrhiCal or other physic:rtl conditions peculiar to Lhe particular property, and that t.h<• unncrc:essnry llri rdsh i p i s clue Lo such conditions, rind not. the C:r rcurnstitnces or• condi Lions generally crerited try the 1>1•ovisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; _s2o, ,y�_��9" (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; yy1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of t. h e plan. ,�I;4 r--1,•vr V.3tYI A.,' -- -- -- --- -- Appeal A p p e l l a n t -D i� G l/! ✓]� 1'ot_< YesI No 1.--_ sign Use Reverse side for additional findings I r rr 1 1 ny ,, r ri It . (.1 (11111( . %: I t -II N t I I'Irrnr11r1)• � 111 1111nu1•t11 A( I ( 1 ) I'll ;1 t. t,hc 1-c 11 rI, url I (lUl[ ph ys i. c 11 1 (: l I•r: tIIII 'i t. it I I: 11 S; Or (:(/nd 1 t. 1 11 rr , inl:ludIIIg i rrcgulrtri t.}', fill rr•owness, or shrtl Iot.nI-"s ()f lot SIZr' OC Silrlpe, 01- exCe1)LiOna1 topOgr•rtl)icaI or• other physicit condIt.lolls peculiar- Lo the particular property, rind that thr• unntrc:"-s "Iry I]Itr•tls}111) is due Lo such conditions, rind not. the rI:uIII stafI oI- con(li Lions general I created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or disLr�iic-tin which tilee property is located; (l) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; V (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the leftst modification possible of' the zoning{ regulations and of the plan. Appeal t A1)pr.l hint 4EAJ Vote: Yes 1 `_ No sign Use Reverse side for addi t.ional findings �,rl I11 ISI�IlI,I;:I;ftr'• i.ei.`:INI; 1u1�11(Ir �11� \I�.It �,1";I�:�� I I rill 1119ti I rr Ill• - (rr(IllIIC4 1 111 tier t I ur1 ! I I Y/ t the I' I rr1111 1 rrr' Ile%•.. I ulrulr•11I AII t t_hcrre II re un I clue phys i ea 1 c i rCunls Lnrre:Irs; err CUIIfl I t. I i,rls; , ludIIIg it - I - ( - IJIItrit.}., nnr-r-owr,css, or s;hirl Iotilless r,f lot sIZe or shape, or excel)LionItI Lopogrlthicnl or other physical condi t.1oils pecul iar- t.o Lhe E,ctrt- icuInr property, rind that the uI111CCssar3' hrtrdsh i lI i s clue Lo such coed i t. i ons , and not. the i:ircumstY►ncc's or condI o r I s generally cI. ell Led Isy the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; -------------- (2)_ That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of' the zoning regulations and of the plan. Zil,_Y� Appeal t Urtte Sd7Z— — - A pp(- II an t Te6 >~ a cr/L 3 e U Voter : Yes No ti i gn Use Reverse side for additional findings 'i(li III ISI�I(I.Itir;l(�'. ,'.cl`ilNc; itcr,�l�lr ell \I(Jl:�;�l`il "d"I I I rr(i r r(gti t rl +( r<fnrl( 1 t lr tir•( t 1 (In J •I1;1< r,t t jl(• I' I;(rlrl r tlr' II,II rl t A 1 ( I ) I'II;r t. Llhcr-c. ;1 rcr un r ykI 1>Itys i ellums tanc:crs clr c onrl r t" i oils; , inc.luclitl� i I"rc•�.;ul+cri t.r narrowness, or shrrl Iuwne ss; of lot srze or sirrApc., or ('xCe1)Lional topor;rahiCaI or other physicrl condit.ioils peculiar to Lhe particular property, and that the unnc<.crssur'} hr rcls11 i 11 i s clue Lo such coed i t i oils , and not. the urtlst,;AI ..s or corid it.ions g(.- nerally created b,p the provrsio of the zoning; regulations in the neighborhood or distrI in which Lhe property is located; (2). That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore ne ssary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such nnecessary hardship has not been created by the appella ; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent Property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the leasL modification possible of the zoning regulations and of - the plan- Appeal 1)a t.e Appal gnat Vo to : Yes — No S i gr, Use Reverse side for additional finding :;rrl 111 Ill�lfl.I;Jl;frr'. ,'.r,`:INr; It,r,\Itir rrl \i�.11':;Ir•I�.�`� h r 1141 t n) t r, rtr „rclrtnr•r• u t t.lt tier t t r,n l !I i{ f t hr• I' I „r,r, r r,r• Ill• �•,• I „Irur'n t .\r' 1 ( I ) l•hnt t}tcrrct lira In r clue phys icrt 1 c_ i r(IUIII S tanr:rrti nr < c,nri r i. t rrn•; i nr: 1 lid i fig i rre gI) I a l i t-Y , nfrrr'ot.,ness , or still I I ot.ness; rr f l o t stzc or sital,e, or exceptional t.opogrfthical or othr-r physic,Itl conditions peculirtr' to the particular pr'opt.,rty, and t_hrtt Lhe• unnec:essar'y lift rdsh i p is clue to such conditions , rind not. the is i rcurns tanccs or cond i t. i ons generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in Which the property is located; (l). That because of such physical cirermstrinces or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not een created b the nnnot t--+ ( 4 ) •••.+. A.uc vna 1unC;e, iI auLnorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; J (5) That the variance, if authorized!r will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal t 677zol Uitte Q�.%% - - Appal Itint / .5 Vo ter: Yes No Use Reverse side for additional ISign t•indirigs RM 1 ')I tl I*li lHil I.I NI; I et" , wl: I NI; Ilt t,\I.It I tl. \I.I I:" II..",�I� I l rill I n};ti I rt It r'dnrt t t.lt tie• t I urt l it i< r, t 1 hi I'Irinrttlit, \ Itt•VI• I rtlnnIt Ac t ( I 1 1 ha t Lhc re nr er lift ► <lkI phys i eft 1 <, i r runts t;►ne;v eer e <inrl r t. I eats; including; i►•regitIitrit.}', fill rruwrlesti, ur sh►►l lu%4rI ; e,f lot s t ze or si►ape , or except i ona I topog; r-fth ical or other phys i cn 1 conditions pecuIiitr' to the pit rticuIar property, rind thnt the unnecessary lift rdsh i p i s clue to such cond i t i ons , find not. the circumstances or conclit.ions generally created by the provisions Of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in Which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, n be etrimenyl to the pu-b/lic welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modifica on ossible of the"loni riegulat-ions andsgf the plan. Appeal ])It t. c - - - �-�- - - Appel lent Vo to : Yes Sign N o I-- � Use Reverse side for additional findings