Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Decision - 1855 Shelburne Road (2)SOUTH � .'.LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF )JUST, NT ?indings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unioue physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; M (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) "hat the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential - character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the a-�:-nrcpriate use or development of adjacent; property, nor b.e dCtrimental to t.:e public welfare; and (S) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zor_ing regulations and of the plan. Da to Appellant Vote: Yes 0 List findings below: 1. Appeal n 7 No 0 LAI— -�s•-mil T � �' r SOUTH ?LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF1..JJUSTi`yNT ?indings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ❑ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; � (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or Permanently impair the aT-,nrcPriate use or development of adjacent, property, nor be dCtrimental to t.,e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Plan. 'Appeal 7#1 Date J appellant I Vote: Yes Q No Sig «' List findings bel i � 1 SOUTH ( r?LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF�..JJUSTNyNT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; E J (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be develored in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; E- (4) "hat the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the Property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the a--prcrriate use or development of adjacent, property, nor be d.trimental to t :e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El = Appeal W4 Date --1 `0 Aonellant C' P iN or L Co ` - r Vote: Yes" No Sign I•ist findings below: 'WT w,T4 LL-Xm-T-wy- AuD ALLOT ®uF (�03 w LL J�.fj -�M k 69 S am ► Harz 2 1 • - - �a - - -- V, SOUTH RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF�.. )JUST NT ;indings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or: exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 1A (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by t;;v appellant; _ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential` character of the neighborhood or district in which the Property is located, nor substantially or permanently irDair the a.=c Driate use or development of adjacent; property, nor to detrimental to tr:e public welfare; and Q (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minium variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Appeal n Date / L'- - Vote: Yes No El List findings below: 2. Sign 3• i yy SOUTH :LINGTON ZONING BOAT D OF l ..JUSTI�NT findings in accordance with Section 1+1+6F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or, exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; ET (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable iise of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; nz (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the a--.nrcpriate use or development of adjacent roperty, nor .e detrimental to t..e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minium variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �- Da t e Appellant -�A. � C� Vote: Yes No Fist findings below: 1. 2. 3- Appeal n Sign