Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1805 Shelburne RoadCorrective Action Plan 1805 Shelburne Road City of South Burlington, Chittendon County Vermont Prepared For: George Weston Bakeries, Inc. Horsham, Pennsylvania Project No. 031_821 November 10, 2003 I oaf iThis report was prepared by the individuals listed below. Any questions or comments regarding the information provided herein should be directed to these i individuals. Submitted by: Kelly Hegarty Project Scientist Reviewed by: Samuel R. Haydock, MS, LEP Director, Northeast Environmental Operations I iCorrective Action Flan Nove„n,eer 'i 0, 20U3 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 031.821 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Corrective Action Plan has been prepared to address remediation of gasoline impacted soil and ground water located at 1805 Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont in accordance with the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VT ANR), Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Corrective Action Guidance. A release of gasoline to the surrounding soils from former underground storage tanks (USTs) and dispensers located in the southeastern portion of the property was reported to the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) in 1990 and spill number 90-0485 was assigned to the site. The investigation of this spill has been ongoing, with little remedial action beyond monitoring the gasoline plume in the ground water, since at least March of 1990. Historical data from work completed by Griffin International shows little reduction of contaminant levels in ground water over the past 13 years. The data also shows a minimal migration of the plume due to the clayey nature of the on -site soils. Free product has been detected sporadically throughout the past monitoring events with the most recent detection of approximately 1.15 feet in January 2003, which is approximately 1 foot higher than the last detection of free product in 1997. The risk to human health and the environment at the site is considered to be low based on limited movement of the contaminant plume. The VT DEC, Sites Management Section (SMS) was willing to allow contaminated soil and ground water to remain in place at the site with a notice placed in the permanent land record for the site. The notice would have referenced the petroleum contamination on the site and indicated that the VT DEC, SMS be contacted before subsurface work commenced at the site. With this deed notice in place, the site would have received a Sites Management Activity Completed (SMAC) designation. However, the current landowner is uncomfortable with the level of contamination and the amount of free product at the site and has proposed corrective action. The selected corrective action consists of excavation of the contaminated soils, stockpiling the soils on -site, followed by on -site thermal treatment of the soils by a patented Mobile Injection Treatment Unit (MITU) technology operated by CBA Environmental Services, Inc. Thermal treatment with the MITU is capable of removing between 90% and 99% of contaminant mass. Treated soil will then be backfilled into the excavation. Ground water encountered during excavation activities will be temporarily stored on -site in a frac tank, if dewatering is necessary. The recovered ground water will be treated and discharged on -site. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 031-821 The remedial objectives are to gain SMAC designation for the site without land use restrictions or deed notices and to eliminate free product and significantly reduce dissolved contamination within the source area. Cleanup goals are to reduce levels of dissolved contamination throughout the site to below Vermont Ground Water Quality Enforcement Standards. Subsequent to the end of soil treatment, ground water quality will be monitored to determine the effectiveness of the remedial process. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 031L821 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction, Regulatory Program Status, Project Team ................. 1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................. 1 1.2 Program Regulatory Status......................................................... 1 1.3 Project Team.............................................................................. 2 2.0 Site Description and History............................................................... 3 2.1 Site Description........................................................................... 3 2.2 Site History ................................................................................. 3 2.3 Previous Investigations............................................................... 3 2.4 Conceptual Site Model................................................................ 4 3.0 Topographic, Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting ......................... 5 3.1 Topographic Setting.................................................................... 5 3.2 Geologic Setting......................................................................... 5 3.3 Hydrogeologic Setting................................................................. 5 4.0 Corrective Action Alternatives........................................................... 6 4.1 Remedial Objectives and Goals .................................................. 6 4.2 Remedial Alternatives................................................................. 6 4.3 Selected Corrective Action.......................................................... 7 4.3.1 Treatment Technology...................................................... 7 4.3.2 Excavation and Dewatering.............................................. 7 4.3.3 Schedule...........................................................................9 4.4 Final Summary Report ................................................................ 9 5.0 Sensitive Receptor Survey............................................................... 10 5.1 Receptor Population................................................................. 10 6.0 Conclusions....................................................................................... 11 Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 031-821 Appendices Appendix A Figures Figure 1 — Site Location Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — Ground Water Elevation Figure 4a — Approximate Limits of Impacted Soils Above the Water Table Figure 4b —Approximate Limits of Impacted Soils Below the Water Table Figure 5 — BTEX Isocontours — Soil Figure 6 — BTEX Isocontours- Ground Water Figure 7 — Approximate Limits of Excavation Figure 8 — Staging Areas and Treatment Area Layout Appendix B Data Tables Table 1 — Soil Results, August 2003 Table 2 — Ground Water Monitoring Results, February 2003 Appendix C MITU Specification Sheets Appendix D Health and Safety Plan Appendix E Resumes Appendix F Griffin Site Monitoring Report Appendix G BL Companies Boring Logs and Laboratory Data Reports Corrective Action Pian November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 03L821 1.0 INTRODUCTION, REGULATORY PROGRAM STATUS, PROJECT TEAM 1.1 Introduction On behalf of George Weston Bakeries, Inc., BL Companies and CBA Environmental Services, Inc. have prepared this Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the Former Bouyea-Fassetts Bakery site located at 1805 Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont (the site). A release of gasoline to the surrounding soils from former underground storage tanks (USTs) and dispensers located in the southeastern portion of the property was reported to the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) in 1990. The VT DEC assigned spill number 90-0485 to the site. 1.2 Program Regulatory Status The CAP has been prepared as required by the VT DEC, Waste Management Division (WMD), Sites Management Section (SMS). The VT DEG has assigned spill number 90-0485 to the site. According to a letter from Mr. Haslarn of the VT I DEC, SMS, to Mr. Michael Payette, CPC Baking Business (CP.C), the WMD agreed to give the site a Site Management Activity Complete (SMAC) designation with the stipulation that a notice be placed in the land records for the parcel. The notice would have stated that residual petroleum contamination remained on -site and that prior to any subsurface work in the area of the impacted soils the SMS be notified. CPC did not want the impacted condition of Ithe soils to be placed in the land records for the site, as stated in a letter from Mr. Michael C. Payette of CPC, to Mr. Haslam of the VT DEC, SMS. The site is currently listed with an open spill. The CAP has been prepared in general accordance with the Corrective Action Guidance. The main goals of the CAP include, but may not be limited to the following. - To remove the source of continuing ground water contamination from petroleum impacted soils. • To achieve compliance with the Ground Water Enforcement Standards (GWES). • SMAC designation for the site. Corrective Action Pian November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 1 031-821 1.3 Project Team The individuals directly involved with the site project are listed below. • Mr. Bob Haslam, Hazardous Materials Specialist, Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Sites Management Section • George Weston Bakeries • Mr. Clark Romberger, CBA Environmental Services, Inc. • Mr. Bruce Bruso, CBA Environmental Services, Inc. • Samuel R. Haydock, PG, LEP, BL Companies, Director of Northeast Environmental Services • Kelly Hegarty, BL Companies • William Zimmerman, BL Companies Resumes are included in Appendix E. Corrective Action Flan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 2 03L821 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY 2.1 Site Description The site is located at 1805 Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont. A Site Location Map is included in Appendix A. The site consists of approximately 14 acres of land located on the eastern side of Shelburne Road, approximately 150 feet north of the Shelburne Road and Allen Street intersection. The site is developed with an approximate 75,000-square- foot, building located on the southwestern portion of the site. Asphalt -paved parking areas are located on the northern, eastern and southeastern sides of the building. The northern portion of the site consists of undeveloped land. Bartlet Brook is located in the northern portion of the site. The site features are illustrated on the Site Plan included in Appendix A. 2.2 Site History A release of gasoline to the surrounding soils from former underground storage tanks (USTs) and dispensers located in the southeastern portion of the property was reported to the VT DEC in 1990 and spill number 90-0485 was assigned to the site. The investigation of this spill has been ongoing with little remedial action beyond monitoring the gasoline plume in the ground water. 2.3 Previous Investigations The most recent Ground Water Monitoring Report prepared by Griffin International (Griffin) in February 2003, was reviewed. Griffin collected samples from five of the ten monitoring wells (MW-2, MW-5, MW-7, MW-10 and MW-11). Monitoring well MW-6 was not sampled due to the presence of Light Non - Aqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL). Approximately 1.15 feet of LNAPL was observed in MW-6, which is one foot more than the last time LNAPL was observed in 1995. The remaining wells were listed as paved over, damaged, or destroyed. Concentrations of Total BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene) were reported to be lower than the last sampling event in 1998 in monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5 and MW-11. Ground water results from the last monitoring event are presented in Table 2 — Ground Water Monitoring Results, February 2003. Isocontours depicting the area of impacted ground water are illustrated in Figure 6. Griffin concluded that the plume appeared to be stable and was not migrating downgradient and that the contaminant concentrations remained high in the source area. Ground water elevation contours are Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 3 03L821 illustrated in Figure 3. A copy of the Griffin Site Monitoring Report from February 2003 is included in Appendix F. CBA and BL Companies conducted a subsurface soil investigation at the site in August of 2003. Twenty soil borings were advanced in the area of the former USTs and dispenser island using a hollow stem auger drill rig. Fourteen soil samples were selected from thirteen of the borings for analysis for aromatic hydrocarbons and methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8260, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons — Gasoline Range Organics (TPH-GRO) by EPA Method 8015B, and Total Lead. BTEX, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- trimethylbenzene, naphthalene and MTBE were detected in many of the soil samples. TPH-GRO was detected in each of the soil samples ranging from 12 parts per million (ppm) to 1630 ppm. Lead was detected in five of the fourteen samples at levels attributed to background conditions. The results of the investigation demonstrated that the level of residual gasoline contamination remains high in soils located in the source area at the site. Soil results are presented in Table 1 — Soil Results, August 2003. The extent of impacted soils is shown in Figures 4A, 4B and 5. Figure 4A illustrates impacted soils above the water table and Figure 413 illustrates impacted soils below the water table. Boring logs and laboratory data are included in Appendix G. 2.4 Conceptual Site Model The Conceptual Site Model currently identifies the locations of former gasoline USTs and associated dispenser island as the primary Area of Concern/Potential Release Area. Releases from leaking tanks and spills and leaks from the dispenser island are the primary release mechanisms. The release of gasoline to soil and ground water at the site was reported in early 1990 to the VT DEC. The ground water at the site has been monitored since at least March of 1990. The volume of the release is currently unknown. Soils with elevated levels of gasoline related compounds have remained in the area of the removed USTs and dispenser island. Impacted soils above the water table in the area of the USTs and dispenser island are approximately 2770 square feet and 2244 square feet, respectively. Impacted soils below the water table cover an area of approximately 18,420 square feet. The nature of the geology of the site has limited the natural attenuation and biodegradation of the gasoline spill and has also limited the extent of the migration of the contaminant plume. Evidence of this is observed in the fact that after thirteen years free product is still present in one of the wells at 1.15 feet. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 4 03L821 3.0 GEOLOGIC, HYDROGEOLOGIC, AND TOPOGRAPHIC SETTING 3.1 Topographic Setting According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle of Burlington, Vermont, the site slopes to the west and has an approximate average el9vation of 140 feet AMSL. 3.2 Geologic Setting { Geologically, the site is located in the Hudson Champlain Lowlands Physiographic Province and is underlain by quartzite, dolomite, slate, phylite, I sandstone, shale, limestone, conglomerate and marble of Cambrian origin. ` Bedrock outcrops are not present at the site. On -site soils logged during the installation of soil borings in August of 2003 consisted of brown to gray clay and silt with varying amounts of sand and gravel underlain by fine to coarse sand with varying amounts of silt, clay and gravel (See Appendix B, Boring Logs). Depths of borings ranged from 6 to 16 feet below ground surface (bgs). The bedrock surface was not encountered in any of the borings during sampling. Ground water was encountered at approximately 6 feet bgs. 3.3 Hydrogeologic Setting The depth to ground water was measured in the on -site monitoring wells on January 21, 2003. The ground water flow direction across most of the site is towards the north and northwest. The ground water flow across the site is depicted in Figure 3. Bartlet Brook is a sensitive receptor located approximately 180 feet to the northeast of the gasoline -impacted area. This sensitive receptor is not known to have been impacted by the gasoline spill. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 5 031-821 4.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION ALTERNATIVES 4.1 Remedial Objectives and Goals The goals of the remedial action are as follows: • Achieve SMAC designation, for the site without a land use restriction or notice in the permanent deed record. • Eliminate free product and significantly reduce dissolved contamination within the source area. • Ground water at the site will achieve compliance with the GWES. 4.2 Remedial Alternatives Soil and ground water at the site have been impacted by gasoline. The following alternatives for Remedial Action have been identified: 1. No additional action. 2. Excavation and off -site disposal of the petroleum -impacted soil. 3. Excavation and on -site treatment of petroleum -impacted soils with a Mobile Injection Treatment Unit (MITU). Alternative One, no additional action, would be acceptable to the VT DEC, SMS provided a notice be placed in the land records indicating that petroleum impacted soils remain at the site. However, the current landowner is not comfortable leaving the contaminated soil and ground water in place given the amount of free product detected in one of the monitoring wells. Therefore, this alternative is not considered any further. Alternative two, excavation and off -site disposal of the petroleum -impacted soil, would accomplish both goals of treating the source and reducing the impact to ground water. However, the amount of impacted soils having to be disposed of off -site may make the cost of cleanup very expensive. Alternative three, excavation and on -site treatment of petroleum -impacted soils with a MITU, would accomplish both goals of treating the source and reducing the impact to ground water as in the above alternative. This alternative involves thermal treatment of VOCs using the MITU. This is accomplished by using Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 6 031-821 forced hot air at temperatures up to 800' F, from an onboard heat generator, to desorb organic compounds from the soils. An attached activated carbon absorbent media then captures the VOCs released from the soil. Thermal treatment with the MITU is capable of removing between 90% and 99% of contaminant mass. The process rate typically varies from 50 cubic yards per day up to 150 cubic yards per day. This rate is highly dependent on soil and contaminant characteristics, initial contaminant concentrations, and final objectives for contaminant concentrations. This alternative provides significant cost savings over excavation and off -site disposal discussed in alternative two. Therefore, this alternative has been selected to treat the petroleum -impacted soils at the site. 4.3 Selected Corrective Action 4.3.1 Treatment Technology The Mobile Injection Treatment Unit 12 (MITU 12) is the model proposed to perform ex -situ treatment on this project. The base equipment of this model is a 45,0001b to 65,0001b track excavator. Three main attachments will be added to the excavator to form the MITU. These attachments include; a trenching head assembly, a rear mounting auxiliary power unit, and an electronically powered heat generator. The trenching head consists of a 12 foot digging boom with approximately 25 feet of cutting chain. The cut width is approximately 12 inches to a maximum depth of 12 feet. An aluminum shroud is mounted over the trenching head and is subjected to negative pressure. The hood assembly, under negative pressure, is used to collect vapors and also to control dust. The auxiliary power unit consists of a 130 HP diesel engine used to power the trenching head. The power unit assembly also contains the blower/vacuum and an activated carbon filter utilized for off -gas treatment. The unit also houses the hydraulic fluid reservoir and a three stage hydraulic pump. The heat generator is mounted on a skid and consists of all explosion proof equipment including a 300cfm fan/blower and a circulation heater that outputs a maximum temperature of 800' F. 4.3.2 Excavation and Dewateri CBA is proposing to use the MITU 12 to perform ex -situ treatment on this project. The ex -situ treatment method has been chosen due to the desire to treat saturated soils; removing them from their place of origin will allow the soils to dry and hence improve contaminant removal efficiencies. Specification sheets for all of the MITU models are provided as Appendix C. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 7 03L821 The contaminated soil will be excavated and screened for the presence of VOCs using a PID. Excavated soils having a PID reading of less than 10 ppm will be segregated and used for backfill without treatment. Excavated soils having a PID reading above 10 ppm will be placed on a stockpile in a windrow fashion. The windrows will be constructed no higher than 6 feet and no wider than 12 feet. Excavated soils that are not placed in windrows for treatment, due to space restraints, may be staged on site. Staged soils along with windrows not being treated will be covered with plastic sheeting. A portable fabric structure, 52 ft. wide x 100 ft. long x 24 ft. high may also be deployed to enclose the stockpile treatment area. The estimated soil volume that will be excavated and treated is approximately 5,207 cubic yards. Approximately 1,114 cubic yards are located above the water table in the area of the former USTs and dispenser island. The remaining 4093 cubic yards are located below the water table. The MITU-12 will take a position adjacent to the stockpile and travel in a parallel manner treating the soil as it moves. Vapors will be collected beneath the vapor collection hood and contaminants desorbed from the soil will be adsorbed on granular activated carbon. It is likely that the excavation of and treatment of soil located within the petroleum contaminant plume source area will significantly reduce measurable dissolved contamination in the downgradient ground water by the physical removal of adsorbed petroleum contamination, which is acting as a continued source of dissolved contamination. Soil excavation within the plume is feasible due to the reasonably shallow water table at the site, which is likely the upper vertical extent of the most adsorbed petroleum contamination. If necessary, CBA is also proposing to add an oxygen -release compound as a polishing step and to help further groundwater treatment as well. The reagent that is being proposed is FMC Corporation's PermeOx@ Plus. This reagent will be directly applied to the soils and thoroughly homogenized using the MITU. The addition of this reagent will aid in achieving remedial compliance in the soils, and also serve as a groundwater remediation technology. Since PermeOx® Plus releases oxygen over an extended time period, when the treated soils are replaced in the excavation the added reagent will continue to release oxygen, thereby, aiding in groundwater remediation. If necessary, ground water encountered during excavation activities will be pumped into a minimum capacity 20,000-gallon frac tank, which will be mobilized to the site temporarily during the excavation and treatment phase of the project. Dewatering will be conducted to facilitate soil excavation and to eliminate dissolved petroleum contamination from the subsurface. Contaminated ground water will be pumped from the frac tank, through two liquid phase carbon adsorption canisters to remove dissolved petroleum contaminants from the water. Following treatment, the water will be discharged to the ground surface at the subject site. A General Permit for Discharges From Petroleum Related Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 8 03L821 Remediation Activities will be obtained from the VT DEC for the discharge of treated ground water. Soil samples will be collected from the treated soil piles and screened in the field periodically for the presence of VOCs using a PID. Subsequent to treatment and prior to backfilling the excavation, samples will be collected from the treated soils and analyzed for aromatic VOCs via EPA Method 8260 at a frequency of 1 sample per 200 cubic yards. 4.3.3 Schedule I The time required to complete treatment is approximately 75 to 90 working days. CBA estimates that site work, including excavation and backfill could be completed within 4 to 6 months upon initiating work on the site. The current landowner wants to carry out an aggressive schedule and would like to commence excavation prior to the onset of heavy frost. 4.4 Final Summary Report Following excavation, treatment, and soil sampling, a summary report will be prepared. The following minimum information will be included in the report: • Site location map • Site map • Soil screening data • Ground water contour map (before and after soil excavation) • Ground water sample analysis results • Field observations • Conclusions • Recommendations Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 9 03L821 5.0 SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY 5.1 Receptor Population A sensitive receptor survey was completed by Griffin International prior to BL Companies and CBA's involvement with the site. Sensitive receptors were determined to not be at risk from petroleum contamination remaining on th-e site. The VT DEC, SMS has previously determined that the risk to sensitive receptors in the area of the site is low and was willing to allow contaminated soil and ground water to remain in place at the site with a notice placed in the permanent land record for the site. The notice would have referenced the petroleum contamination on the site and indicated that the VT DEC, SMS be contacted before subsurface work commenced on the site. The site receives potable water from municipal sources. The site geology consists of dense clayey soils with low hydraulic conductivity and the contaminated ground water plume has shown little to no migration over the past 13 years of monitoring. Based on previous investigations of the site and of the risk to sensitive receptors in the area of the site, and the past decisions of the VT DEC, SMS, no sensitive receptors are at risk from petroleum contamination originating from the site. Corrective Action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 10 031-821 L 6.0 CONCLUSIONS This CAP has been prepared to address remediation of gasoline impacted soil and ground water located at 1805 Shelburne Road, City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont in accordance with the VT ANR, DEC, Corrective Action Guidance. The goal of the remedial action is to achieve SMAC designation for the site without land use restrictions and deed notices, and reduction of dissolved contamination to below Vermont Ground Water Quality Standards. The goals of the investigation should be achievable, based on the following: • The spill occurred in 1990 and has been ongoing with little remedial action beyond monitoring of the gasoline plume in ground water since March of 1990. • The contaminant plume has shown little to no natural attenuation, biodegradation, or migration. • The risks to human health and the environment are low. • The site has already been accepted for SMAC designation with a land records notice for residual petroleum contamination remaining on -site. • Current landowner is uncomfortable with leaving the level of contaminated soil and ground water untouched at the site and has proposed corrective action. L • The selected remedial action consists of excavation of the contaminated soils, stockpiling soil on -site, and thermal treatment of the contaminated soils. • Thermal treatment with the MITU is capable of removing between 90% and 99% of contaminant mass. • The addition of an oxygen -releasing compound, PermeOx® Plus, as a polishing step will aid in achieving remedial compliance in the soils, and also serve as a groundwater remediation technology. • The current landowner wants to carry out an aggressive schedule and would like to commence excavation prior to the onset of heavy frost. Corrective action Plan November 10, 2003 1805 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, Vermont 11 031-821 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Data Tables Appendix C MITU Specification Sheets Appendix D Health and Safety Plan Appendix E Resumes Appendix F Griffin Site Monitoring Report Appendix G BL Companies Boring Logs and Laboratory Data Reports APPENDIX A Figures IL i � a �•.. IL oar .70 dp y SITE ! r Ott LOCATION IFa E�I1d GV6-2003 Maptec: Irlc. 1i RiFls Reserved Not Fo avigatia Base map is a reproduction of the U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle of South Burlington, Vermont NOT TO SCALE . SITE LOCATION MAP .� SOU H BURLI NE ROAD CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Companies Project No. 03L821 Monitoring Well (Griffin) ARCHITECTURE .� ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING vvr' �.+�+' �w ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. VG �, ...... �.. SITE PLAN 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT Designed X.X.X. Drown K.A.H. Checked Approved Scole Project No. 031821 Dote 10/30/03 CAD File 031e21.Sit m- XREF(s): NONE pin rS I'L -2 qG Ground Water Contour Note: Survey, ground water elevations, and ground water contours completed by Griffin International. Ground water measurements were conducted on January 21, 2003. ARCHITECTURE ED ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE �CBA � LAND SURVEYING cornperia ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. GROUND WATEER CONTOUR MAP 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT Designed X.X.X. Drown K.A.H. Checked Approved Scale Project No, 031821 Dote 10/30/03 CAD File 034821.cwc-11 XREF(s): NONE I ,n e% ING ® Estimated Area of Gasoline Impacted Soils MW-9 m ®S ® X.X.X. ARCHITECTURE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF IMPACTED SOIL ABOVE WATER TABLE Designed ENGINEERING s` " Drown ..�,..,,.,,�.,..�._._.�,.�.,.�,.M.,.c.,,,w,... ..,,....,..<.,,.,.,......,,�„�...�....,.��.�.,...M_........,_�...,,,.,,....,,..w.._,,�,.,,..,.....�.�.u.,...m:,....,��.. H. Checked _ PLANNING Approved 031821 Wi& LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE(MA Scole riG�' LAND SURVEYING 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD DatProject No. 30/03 Dote 10/30/03 *N ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT CAD File 031621.1m�WS.uA XREF(s): "'ONE PAVED PARKING BOUYEA—FASSETS BAKERY AND OFFICES LEGEND ® Soil Boring, (BL and CBA) Monitoring Well (Griffin) ® Estimated Area of Gasoline Impacted Soils « _..,, _.. ..., ,_hewn ed K.A.H. ARCHITECTURE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF IMPACTED SOIL BLOW WATER TABLE Drown Checked X X X ENGINEERING � . � �� �'� PLANNING APProved.., . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Scole t"=50' F��—�h �./ � Project Na 0 LAND SURVEYING 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD Dote t0/30/03/03 Corn Cff.jW ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT CAD File oy821,-poct.dsoRe `�'"" Y""�� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. XREF(s): NONE Total BTEX in ppb Io Inferred Total BTEX in ppb I ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COA LAND SURVEYING ^0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES �^^' YQ� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. ING BTEX ISOCONTOURS IN SOIL 1805 SHE:LBURNE ROAD CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT Designed X.X.X. Drown K.A.H. Checked Approved i"=50' FIG-5Sco1e Project Nd. 031821 Dote 10/30/03 CAD File 031821.87EXSom XREF(s): NONE NG Total BTEX in ppb (samples collected 1/21/03) — — Inferred Total BTEX in ppb (samples collected 1/21/03) LNAPL Light Non -Aqueous Phase Liquid (detected in MW-6 on 1/21/03) MW-9 m ®S, ARCHITECTURE BTEX ISOCONTOURS IN GROUND WATER x^DesignedK:A.H. XXX ENGINEERINGD Checked PLANNING Approved �� VI — .E4 � LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Project 031821 LAND SURVEYING 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD Project No. Dote 10/30/0330/03 C, n-pl,,.�Im ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT CAD File o.Vaz1.8TEXcw R+� XREF(s): NONE vG Approximate Limits of Excavated Area APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF EXCAVATION Designed X,x.X. ARCHITECTURE Drown K.A.H. . ..,. Approved Checked ENGINEERING ' " � � � PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Scale 1 031821 "=50' bkw CBA Project No. 30/03 LAND SURVEYING 1805 SHE:LBURNE ROAD Dote 10/30/03 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT CAD File u]eY,.E.envLms ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. XREF(s): NONE TREATED SOIL ---- --LE (ING MW-10 - 100' X 52' FABRIC TEM MW-8 W ®SB12 mm C MW=S SBE DSB11 PROPOSE', EXCAVAT MW-2 m MW-4 ®SBn B3 S ® ®SB6 M� 3 ®S85 SB7 B C� ®SB2 eB8 LEGEND zx 0 SoilBoring, (BL and CBA)m Monitoring Well (Griffin) Designed ARCHITECTURE STAGING AREAS AND i REATMENT AREA LAYOUT K.A.H. ENGINEERING` Drown .,„�.o �,�. AG .��F,..�.-., _�. � � .z �,. �,.�,.,�.,, •_ .,_�,.«u,�, �.:,.,.�„��� ,�,�.,..,e,�a, ,. Checked PLANNING Approved �!G—S LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Scale 1" 1821 FIG No,, 03t821 LAND SURVEYING 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD Dote 10/30/03 �•,,.,�.,,,•.ift ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT CAD File o�an.Tnm�ao�� y� �� �F+� XREF(s): t,ONE APPENDIX B Data Tables EPA Region III EPA Re ion III SSLs Industrial RBC Residential RBC DAF 1 DAF 20 720 160 0.00059 0.012 52 12 0.000095 0.0019 200000 16000 0.44 8.8 100000 7800 0.75 15 200000 16000 0.15 3 51000 3900 NE NE 51000 3900 NE NE 20000 1600 0.0077 0.15 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Dnly detected compounds are listed ND = Not Detected NA = Not Analyzed NE = Not Established 3pm = parts per million Bold = Exceedance of EPA Region III SSLs DAF 1 llndedine = Exceedance of EPA Region III SSLs DAF 20 Shading = Exceedance of EPA Region III Residential RBC Shading = Exceedance of EPA Region III Industrial RBC SSLs = Soil Screening Levels RBC = Risk Based Concentration DAF = Dilution Attenuation Factor Table 1 Soil Results - August 2003 Samples Collected August 7 and 8, 2003 BL Project No. 031-821 Former Bouyea-Fassets Bakery 1805 Shelburne Road City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont ND Table 2 Ground Water Analytical Results - February 2003 Samples Collected January 21, 2003 BL Project No. 031-821 Former Bouyea-Fassets Bakery 1805 Shelburne Road City of South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont VT Ground Water Quality Standards ES PAL MW-2 MW-5 MW-6" MW-7 MW-10 MW-11 VOCs (ppm) MTBE 40 20 1440 `' 426 ' NA 216 ND ND Benzene 5 0.5 6730 470 NA 506 ND ND Toluene 1000 500 1180 216 NA 3110 ND ND Ethylbenzene 700 350 520 874 NA 647 ND ND X lenes 10000 5000 2010 3480 NA 4600 ND ND 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 4 2 ND 967 NA 574 ND ND 1,2,4-trimeth (benzene 5 2.5 240 2730 NA 1610 ND ND napthalene 20 10 ND '555 NA "329 ND ND Only detected compounds are listed ND = Not Detected NA = Not Analyzed NE = Not Established ppm = parts per million Bold = Exceedance of ES Shading =;Exceedance of PAL ES = Enfocement Standard PAL = Perventative Action Level MW-6 not sampled due to 1.15 feet of LNAPL APPENDIX C MITU Specification Sheets ",l • Adaptable to any standard 45,000 to 707000 lb excavator • Easily transported, setup, and operated • In -Situ or Ex -Situ applications • On -Board vapor recovery and treatment • Exempt from most air quality permitting ! The Mobile Injection Treatment Unit Technology has been patented and successfully operated by CBA since 1993. The patented technology consists of an auxiliary power unit and a modified trenching head which are connected to standard excavators. The MITU-12 is capable of treating organic and inorganic contaminated soils either in -situ or ex -situ. The MITU utilizes the trenching action along with heat and various other reagents to remediate contaminated soils. The trenching action of the MITU allows superior soil/reagent blending and soil density breakdown in all soil types. NCSA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. { POWER UNIT z� RAISED POSITION w zs�a. r (For Entry & Exit) I HOOD ASSEMBLY I MITU M ►" `T" a I1 " 0FT. l 1 II [Iri I( CONTAMINATED SOIL ( TREATED 4 FT. SOIL 8 FT. 12 FT. VIRGIN SOIL Excavator Standard John Deere@ Model 690, 45,0001b hydraulic excavator. The MITU attachments are adaptable to various excavator brands and models. Approximate Weight Trenching Head: 5,000 lbs. Power Unit: 3,100 lbs. *Total: 53,100 lbs. (*mounted on John Deere@ 690) MITU Power Unit A John Deere@, 4 cylinder, 110 hp diesel engine is used to power a Commercial 3- stage hydraulic pump. The trenching head, vapor collection system, and a liquid injection pump are all powered by separate stages of the hydraulic pump. All components are mounted on a skid assembly attached to the rear of the excavator. MITU Trenching Head Vermeer® VH-1850 trencher is Hydrostatically driven by a Poclain motor operating at a maximum pressure of 2500 psi. The cutting chain has been modified to fit a 12 ft, reinforced boom designed and manufactured by CBA. The optimum cutting depth is 10 ft at a width of 12 inches. Hood Assembly The hood assembly is constructed of a solid steel frame with a sheet metal exterior. The hood assembly serves as a vapor collection unit as it is subjected to negative pressure. The hood assembly also houses electric heating elements as a source of heat/hot air. Vapor Treatment Vapors are typically transferred to an activated carbon filter assembly, mounted on the MITU Power Unit, at flow rates between 100 cfm to 300 cfm. Vapors can also be transferred to a separate thermal /catalytic oxidizing unit for treatment. Heat Generation The exhaust from both the excavator and MITU Power Unit engines is captured and delivered beneath the hood assembly at a approximate temperature of 1200 F. Forced air at a rate of 100 cfm to 300 cfm is also delivered beneath the hood through a Wellman Thermal@ heat exchanging unit. The heat exchanging unit adjusts the ambient air temperature approximately 600°F to 800°F. The heating unit and associated blower are powered by a separate 50KW generator. CBA Environmental Services, Inc. 57 Park Lane Hegins, Pennsylvania 17938 (570) 682-8742 • Fax (570) 682-8915 www.cbaenvironmental.com OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGIES CBA's staff members have extensive experience with environmental construction and remediation projects ranging from groundwater treatment/control to hazardous waste removal. Services that are available from CBA include: I. Soil Treatment A. MITU technology A. Thermal treatment B. Chemical oxidation C. Natural oxidation i D. Stabilization E. Enhanced Bioremediation G. Special equipment II. Groundwater Treatment and Control A. Mobile groundwater treatment system III. Training A. "HAZWOPER" training B. Table -top simulator training C. OSHA subpart courses 1 IV. Storage Tank Management A. UST/AST removals B. UST/AST installations SOIL TREATMENT CBA is an internationally recognized leader in soil treatment procedures and techniques by utilization of the patented Mobile Injection Treatment Unit (MITU) technology. CBA has successfully completed over 40 soil remediation projects ranging from ex -situ remediation at UST release sites to in -situ remediation at US EPA SUPERFUND sites. CBA's expertise has mainly been with thermal desorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and chemical stabilization of heavy metals; however, new techniques to handle special and specific problems are continually being explored and developed. CBA's on -site soil remediation techniques offer significant cost savings over the conventional "dig -and -haul" approach. The ability of the unique MITU technology to address mixed waste (VOC's and metals) sites also offers a clear advantage over other soil mixing technologies. 2-1 MITU Technology r-Untted States 0� �uulelccCa The Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Has received an application fora patent for a new wed useful invention. The drleanddescrip- titw of the invention are earhssed flu require- ments of law have been complied with, and it liar been determdned that a patent on the bt- :rraion shell he granted under the law: Thercrore, this United States Patent Grants to the personfs) having title a tO patent the right to rxrludr ndierr from rnaking, using, offering far .role, or selling the invention ihmughoat the United States ofAmerica or im- pottivg the invention into the United Sates of ArnerwaJorthe senn set forth below, subject to the paymtent of iwdtuerance fees as prm ided by law. if this application was fried prior to June & 1993, the term of this parent is the longer of seventeen years front ire date of grant of this patent Of twenty yean from the earliest effec- tive US. flung date of the application. subject to any statutory txlensiwt. 1f this application was filed rut or after June & 1995, the renn of rhir/arenrisarettn• ycartJrom the US, filing date, subject to any iat rmy ar- tensian. !f the application contains a spceiftt• reference to an earlierfnled application or ap- piieatiwts under 35 U.S.0 120.121 or 365W the term of die patent is twenn• year -If— due date on which the earliest appliewim wasfiled. subject to wq statutory extension. V� Lri,rwe/r.,�.0 aN Mfiwv4 CBA holds six US Patents and nendin2 International Patents CBA pioneered and developed the MITU soil treatment technology. CBA is the sole developer and user of this specialized technology which currently holds six United States Patents and has several pending International Patents. The patents include a broad spectrum of claims ranging from apparatus to a number of treatment processes performed by the technology on multiple contaminants. Clients who select CBA will benefit by contracting with the sole designers and users of the technology, which eliminates potential infringement issues of other treatment technologies. The MITU was developed and patented by CBA, and has been successfully operated since 1993. The MITU technology has been adapted to several sizes of heavy equipment to meet various treatment objectives. Currently, several different models of the MITU are in operation; each model provides a different treatment depth and production rate. The appropriate MITU model is selected based upon site constraints, type of soil and subsurface conditions, volume of contaminated soil, and budgetary concerns. The MITU units are very flexible in terms of performing soil treatment; various modifications and accessories can be added or eliminated to accommodate treatment goals and site constraints. The units primary functions are to conduct; single or multiple subsurface or surface injections of chemical reagents and/or hot air; soil mixing operations, off -gas emissions collection and treatment. The MITU utilizes a vacuum system to capture off -gases beneath a vapor collection hood; the gases can be conveyed for treatment by various methods, such as activated carbon or thermal oxidation. The MITU technology is capable of performing in -situ treatment at depths of up to 30 feet below grade. All of the units utilize various modified trenching heads to perform soil treatment/mixing. This unique application and process offers several distinct advantages over conventional mechanical soil mixing devices. First, the MITU effectively breaks up the soil density, allowing the addition of chemical reagents in virtually any type of soil. Secondly, the medium and large MITU units are not significantly hampered by subsurface debris; the largest MITU can penetrate solid rock. Thirdly, the units are relatively easily mobilized to almost any location. Finally, as previously mentioned, the MITUs are capable 2-2 Iof treating both organic and inorganic wastes through the simultaneous addition of chemical reagents and hot air. MITU 12 On this model, the modified trenching head is mounted on a track excavator. This is the most widely used MITU unit, as it is capable of treating both in -situ, to a depth of 12 feet below grade, or ex -situ (stockpiles) as high as 8 feet. The MITU 12 is extremely versatile and can maneuver fairly easily given various site constraints. %'1711 !If L 11 MITU 12 In -Ground Application j MITU-LVR ` This model consists of a large track trencher outfitted with a specialized rotating drum 1 attachment. This track trencher has the capability of cutting to a depth of 4 feet with a trench width of 11 feet. This machine is fairly compact when the trenching boom is in the ground; it Iis only approximately 20 feet long at this point. This unit is typically equipped with a vapor collection hood and auxiliary heat system. The MITU Rotating Drum is fairly easily mobilized to most site locations. The unit is compact enough to allow for excellent maneuverability on projects which have very little operating space. This unit is ideal for soils requiring extensively high heat (up to 800 °F) and aggressive soil breakdown (i.e. hard clay). The unit also performs very well at chemical addition and mixing. The MITU Rotating Drum can achieve production rates well in excess of 1000 cubic yards per day. 2-3 MITU 30 This model consists of a large track trencher equivalent or similar to the TRENCOR® 1860HD track trenching machine which has been specially modified for in -situ soil remediation projects. This unit is capable of reaching depths of 30 feet below grade while performing immediate backfill or transfer of soils to a dump truck for removal/staging. The MITU 30 is an extremely large powerful machine capable of very high production rates. 'it. Pin 'TI 1 n,�= 1.11, .�:_.. MITU 30 Features TRENCOR® 1860HD 2-4 Thermal Treatment Thermal treatment utilizing the MITU is very similar to Low Temperature Thermal Desorption (LTTD) technologies; however, the MITU offers some distinct advantages over LTTD and other volatilization technologies that will be discussed later. The MITU's thermal treatment process is designed to operate on the same principles as LTTD; that is to heat the soils to a sufficient temperature to cause constituents to volatilize and desorb from the soil. VOC contamination in vadose zone soils is distributed among three phases of the soil matrix. The distribution of the contamination depends on the soil characteristics as well as the specific contaminants of concern. The movement of contaminants through the soil media is either by advection, movement with bulk air flow, or by diffusion, movement via concentration gradient. Volatile compounds desorb from the soil particle surface, transfer to the soil water, and volatilize to the soil gas. In low to medium permeable soils (sand and gravel), diffusion is the limiting factor in the movement and re - movement of contaminants Thermal treatment with the MITU does not require excavation of contaminated soils; the thermal treatment can be performed in -place or on excavated soils. The underlying feature of successful thermal treatment with the MITU is its ability to break down soil density. The shearing action of the trencher pulverizes the soil into very fine particles, effectively increasing the surface area to volume ratio. In turn, the constituents are more readily volatilized by virtue of increased contact with air flow and heat. The MITU utilizes an electrically powered heat generation system to heat forced air to temperatures in excess of 800°F (425°C). The forced air is then conveyed into the trench and across the soil particles. The final soil temperature depends on the soil characteristics and on retention time. The vaporized constituents are captured beneath a enclosed shroud, that is subjected to negative pressure, and are treated in a secondary treatment unit prior to discharge to the atmosphere. Secondary treatment of the vaporized constituents may consist of condenser units, catalytic or thermal oxidation, and carbon adsorption units. The trenching head, heat generation system, and vapor collection system are all operated through an integrated control panel mounted in the equipment's cab. Several of the system's parameters can be monitored during operation to maintain operational control and optimize treatment effectiveness. (see Figures 2.1 and 2.2) 2-5 The temperature of the forced air stream utilized for thermal treatment is monitored and can be adjusted if necessary. Organic vapors are monitored prior to and after secondary treatment of the vapor stream in order to monitor and adjust treatment as necessary. Explosive atmosphere (% LEL) is also monitored within the vapor collection shroud in order to detect potentially dangerous conditions. Soil heating technologies have proven to remove over 98% of volatile and semivolatile aliphatic and aromatic compounds by achieving soil temperatures of 150' C. The MITU heat generation system operates at continuous temperatures in excess of 400° C. The technology has had very favorable results in the field displaying consistency with the 98% removal efficiency accomplished by soil heating technologies. The process has also been demonstrated to be equally successful at removing chlorinated solvents, specifically PCE and its daughter products. Some typical contaminant removal results achieved through thermal treatment with the MITU are displayed in Table 2.1. Table 2.1: Tvnical Thermal Remediation Results Contaminant Pre -Treatment (mg/kg) --Post Treatment (mg/kg) % Reduction Benzene 5.6 0.005 99.9% Toluene 270 0.05 99.9% Ethyl Benzene 54.5 0.97 98.2% X lene 324 4.5 98.6% PCE 369 18.1 95% TCE 25 .5 98% Data is compiled from 1998 project completed for Hsi Geotrans in Arcade, Ni Some advantages of thermal treatment with the MITU technology over LTTD and various in -situ volatilization technologies are as follows: • The equipment is readily available • The MITU is easily mobilized to most sites • Can be used to treat "hot spot" source areas with minimal site disturbance • The MITU is effective in most soil types • Excavation of soils is not required for treatment • Pre-treatment of soils is not required • The MITU is easily and readily combined with other remedial technologies • Eliminates the need for procurement and placement of backfill material 1 2-6 SITUATION A chemical and waste storage building was the source of contamination at a former Motorola facility near Buffalo, New York. An Interim Remedial Measure (IRM) was developed to address the heavy metal and VOC impacted soils remaining at the currently active facility now owned by Prestolite Electric, Inc. The VOC contamination included BTEX and TCE, while the metal contamination included primarily cadmium but also elevated levels of chromium and lead. The contamination extended to a depth of 12 feet and encompassed a volume of approximately 4,500 cubic yards. Several alternative remedial options were tested and evaluated at the site; they included soil vapor extraction and phytoremediation. These approaches were unsuccessful due to the lithology and characteristics of the site soils. As part of the IRM, and as a voluntarily negotiated Order of Consent, a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and approved proposing the use of the MITU technology to remediate VOC and metals impacted soils. CBA's TECHNOLOGY AND APPROACH Motorola's consultant HSI Geotrans awarded the remediation contract to CBA through a competitive bidding process. The MITU technology was selected based on total cost and on the MITU's ability to treat soils contaminated with mixed waste (e.g. metals and VOCs). CBA proposed forced hot air and mechanical mixing for the thermal stripping and removal of VOCs and admixing of a chemical reagent for the stabilization of heavy metals. The most appealing aspect of this approach was that the MITU could perform both remedial processes simultaneously or as a parallel or serial technique utilizing one or more MITUs. CBA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. PROJECT CASE STUDY Projects VOC and Metals Soil Rernediation, Arcade, New York Client: HSI Geotrans/Motorola, Inc. RESULTS Treatment goals were established for the following volatile organic compounds; TCE - 0.7ppm, toluene-1.5ppm, ethyl benzene - 5.5ppm, and xylene-1.2ppm. The objective for metals treatment was to minimize the potential leachability with TCLP values for cadmium, chromium, and lead approaching or meeting the NYSDEC groundwater standard. During the treatment process subsurface debris in the form of concrete, as large as 14 ft x 4 ft x 4 ft; asphalt; wood and timber; crushed and in tact drum carcasses; metal pipes, plastic and geofabric material, was discovered. A perched water table was also encountered throughout the treatment area at depths as shallow as 3 feet. In -situ treatment with the MITU began in December and was conducted throughout the winter months. A temporary portable structure was erected to facilitate working through the severe climate in this region. The cleanup goals for all heavy metals and for TCE, toluene, and ethyl benzene were met or exceeded. CBA's MITU Technology treated contaminated soils to a site average of 1.2 ppm, or 87% reduction throughout the treatment area, and achieved site closure through NYSDEC. In addition, a 96% reduction was achieved in twelve of the nineteen grids and a reduction in excess of 99% was shown in four of those grids. Based on these results, the Client was able to obtain closure. Project Manager: Clark A. Romberger Site Manager: Donald Chescavage Bid Cost: $500,000 Client Contact Reference: Michael E. Loch, Motorola (847) 480-8000 HSI Project Manager: Rich Gnat (262)792-1282 APPENDIX D Health and Safety Plan hCBA :NVIRONMENTAI SERVICES INC. Site Specific Health & Safety Plan — Summary of Details Owner: George Weston Bakeries, Inc. Site Name: Former Bou ea-Fassetts Bakery Site Address: 1805 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont Site Classification: UST Gasoline Release Site (Spill No. 90-0485) Regulatory Agency: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Former Bou ea-Fassetts Facility SoiD'Groundwater Remediation Engineer/Construction Manager: CBA Environmental Services / BL Companies Engineer's Site Representative: CBA Project Manager: Clark Romber er Phone No. Office/Cell: 570 682-8742 / (570) 527-6450 CBA Site Safety Officer (SSO): George Williams Phone No. Office/Cell: (570) 682-8742 / (570) 527-6456 Project Schedule: November 2003 — March 2004 CBA Project Tasks: 1. Site preparation (structure setup & tree removal) 2. Excavation of contaminated soil 3. Thermal treatment of contaminated soil 4. Application of chemical reagent (if necessary) 5. Personnel and equipment decontamination 6. Backfill and final grading 7. Demobilization tear down structure PHYSICAL HAZARDS Task Hazard 1. Site Preparation Heavy equipment, Moving parts, Trip & Fall, Noise, Hand Tools - Cutting, Cranes and Hoists 2. Soil Excavation Heavy equipment, Moving arts, Trip & Fall, Excavations, Noise 3. Thermal Treatment Heavy equipment, Moving parts, Trip & Fall, Noise, Electrical, Vapors, Fumes, and Dusts 4. Chemical application Heavy equipment, Moving parts, Trip & Fall, Noise, Electrical, Vapors, Fumes, and Dusts 5. Decontamination Trip & Fall, Liquid splash 6. Backfill & Grading Heavy a ui ment, Moving arts, Trip & Fall, Excavations, Noise 7. Demobilization Heavy equipment, Moving parts, Trip & Fall, Heat stress, Noise, Cranes and Hoists CBA Environmental Services, Inc. Site Health & Safety Plan Page 1 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan — Summary of Details Task Contaminant Exposure Route PPE 1. All Tasks Volatile Organic inhalation, ingestion, skin Level D, unless PEL Compounds (VOCs) contact through generation exceeded then Level C of dust with FFAPR Specific chemical hazards associated with gasoline are listed in the Chemicals of Concern Table located in Appendix B of the Health and Safety Program; the table is also attached to this report. All chemicals that are brought onto the site and used by CBA Environmental Services will have an MSDS kept in a binder on the site. The NFPA 704 labeling system will be utilized to label containers. A list of chemicals anticipated to be used is as follows: PermeOX® Gasoline Diesel Fuel -,77777.77 Hand held radios will be utilized for communicating with the operator of the soil treatment equipment. In the event that radio communications fail or an individual is unable to make radio communication, the following emergency hand signals will be used: Hand gripping throat Can not breath, out of air Grip partners wrist or waist Exit the area immediate( Hands on top of head Need assistance Thumbs up I'm OK, I understand Thumbs down Negative, No a NTAL MONITORING Dust _ Dust will be monitored visually, if it becomes noticeable, mitigation procedures will be employed. These procedures include using a water fog/spray to eliminate generation of dust Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Significant levels of fugitive VOCs are not anticipated, however a PID will be utilized for monitoring organic vapor levels. Personal Exposure Personal exposure sampling and monitoring is not applicable for this project. Medical Monitoring Ambient air temperature is expected to be cold during the anticipated project time. Cold weather protection procedures will be implemented when necessary. CBA Environmental Services, Inc. Site Health & Safety Plan Page 2 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan — Summary of Details 'DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES 1, Personnel Decontamination Personnel leaving the exclusion (hot) zone shall be thoroughly decontaminated. The Site safety Officer is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of decontamination procedures. If necessary, disposable PPE will be utilized as outer garments, boots and footwear will be washed and rinsed with detergent and water. Equipment Decontamination Equipment leaving the exclusion zone will be decontaminated thoroughly. Dry decontamination methods will be utilized as much as possible. The final decontamination may utilize a low volume -high pressure water spray. Decon water will be treated and discharged on site. EMERGENCY INFORMATION a' Ambulance Burlington 911 Hospital Fletcher Allen Health Care Emergency: 802-847-2434 Police Burlington 911 Fire Department South Burlington 911 HAZMAT Waterbury 800-641-5005 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES `l Personnel Injury If an injury occurs in the exclusion -zone, the emergency signal of 3 short horn blasts will be sounded. All site Signaled with 3 short horn blasts personnel shall assemble at the designated area, The site safety officer and field team leader should evaluate the cause of the injury and determine if it is safe to remove the individual to the support zone. If required, a outside rescue team shall be summoned to remove the injured person. The injured person should be decontaminated prior to entering the support zone. Appropriate first aid should be initiated and an ambulance should be contacted. No persons shall re-enter the exclusion zone until the cause of the injury has been determined and the SSO has given clearance to re-enter. Fire / Explosion If a fire or explosion occurs on the site, the designated emergency signal of 1 long horn blast shall be sounded. Signaled with 1 long horn blast All site personnel will assemble at the designated location. The fire department shall be notified and personnel will be removed to a safe distance from the incident. STANDING SAFETY ODERS The following safety practices must be followed by site personnel at all times: l . Smoking, eating, chewing gum or tobacco, and drinking are only permitted within clean designated areas and are strictly forbidden within the exclusion zone. 2. Contact with contaminated materials must be minimized at all times. 3. Ignition of flammable liquids within improvised heating devices (barrels) is forbidden 4. A 'Buddy -System" in which one worker is close enough to render another aid will be in effect at all times 5. Good housekeeping practices must be maintained 6. Eye and skin flushing facilities shall be available for immediate use 7. Field tasks will be suspended in the event of treacherous weather conditions until those conditions improve. CBA Environmental Services, Inc. Site Health & Safety Plan Page 3 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan — Summary of Details FET-Y, OWN Q-6i, Personnel 40-Hour HAZWOPER Refresher Fit Test Clark Romber er 7/96 9/03 9/03 George Williams 3/98 1/03 1/03 Tim Klinger 9/03 NA 9/03 DISCLAIMER This Site Specific Health and Safety Plan has been prepared for use by CBA Environmental Services employees for work at this site; CBA Environmental services is not responsible for its use by others. The plan has been prepared for specific site conditions, purposes, tasks, dates and personnel specified within the plan. The plan can only be amended by the individuals listed in the Authorization Section. Subcontractors are solely responsible for the health and safety of their employees and shall comply with all applicable regulations under 29 CFR 1910.120. CBA Environmental Services shall make this plan available to all subcontractors and shall inform them of site emergency procedures. Subcontractors are responsible for the following: 1. Developing their own Site Health and safety Plan 2. Providing their own PPE 3. Providing documentation that their employees have received the proper training and medical approvals Designating their own site saf;ty officer responsible for ensuring that their own employees comply with their Health and Safety Plan AUT14ORIZATION Title Name Signature Date Corporate Safety Officer Bruce L. Bruso Project Manager Clark A. Romberger Site Safety Officer Mike R. Bauer ACKNOWLEDGEMENT F� y h _W Employee (print name) Signature Date CBA Environmental Services, Inc. ISite Health & Safety Plan Page 4 APPENDIX B Chemicals of Concern CHEMICAL ERG NIOSH PEL ST IDLH EXPOSURE SYMPTOMS TARGET ORGANS MTBE 127 Inh, Abs, Ing, Irrit eyes, skin, nose, resp sys Eyes, skin, blood, Benzene 130 26 1 ppm 5 ppm 500 ppm Con headaches nausea resp sys, CNS Inh, Abs, Ing, Irret eyes, nose, fatigue, weak Eyes, skin, resp sys, Toluene 130 310 200 ppm 300 ppm 500 ppm Con dizziness, headache, dilated liver, kidneys pupils Irret eyes, skin, muc membr, Eyes, skin, resp system Ethylbenzene 129 132 100 ppm 125 ppm 800 ppm Inh, Ing, Con headache, coma CNS Inh, Abs, Ing, Irrit eyes, skin, nose, throat Eyes, skin. Resp sys, Xylene 130 334 100 ppm 150 ppm 900 ppm Con dizziness, nausea, vomit CNS, GI tract, blood, liver, kidneys Irrit eyes, skin, nose, throat Eyes, skin, resp sys, 1,3,5-Trimethyl Benzene 129 320 *25 ppm ND ND Inh, Ing, Con resp sys, headache, fatigue CNS, blood Irrit eyes, skin, nose, throat Eyes, skin, resp sys, 1,2,4-Trimethyl Benzene 129 320 *25 ppm ND ND Inh, Ing, Con resp sys, headache, fatigue CNS, blood Irrit eyes, headache, confus, Eyes, skin, blood, Napthalene 133 220 10 ppm 15 ppm 250 ppm Inh. Abs, Ing excit, nausea, vomit, abdom liver, kidneys, CNS Con pain 1. North American Emergency Response Guidebook 2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health * No OSHA Standard listed, NIOSH Recommended Exposure Level used APPENDIX E Resumes Samuel R. Haydock, LEP, PG Director, Northeast Environmental Operations Experience/ Samuel Haydock has more than 16 years of experience in environmental and land -use Expertise consulting. His technical background includes designing and managing site characterization Summary studies for contaminant investigations, design and management of site remediation and brownfields redevelopment projects, ground water exploration and development, water resource assessment and land -use impact evaluations. Land -use impact studies have involved wetland studies, habitat evaluation, water `1 udget analyses, assessment of impacts from development on natural and cultural resources, alternative and mitigation analyses, and preparation and submittal of local, state, and federal land -use permit applications. Samuel has conducted extensive mapping programs of surface and subsurface geologic/hydrogeologic resources. Contaminant experience includes completion of Phase I, II, and III Environmental Assessments and Remedial Investigations (RI)/Feasibility Studies (FS), development of comprehensive site management/work plans, RCRA compliance, interfacing with regulatory agencies, landfill site studies, contaminant source detection/removal and design management of ground water and vapor recovery systems. Education/ MS in Geology, University of Vermont, 1988 Registration BA in Geology, University of Pennsylvania, 1984 40-Hour Hazardous Materials Handling, Health and Safety Training Licensed Environmental Professional: Connecticut — No. 150 Professional Geologist: Kentucky Certified Environmental Specialist No. 11625, Environmental Assessment Association Professional Environmental Auditor No. 1001294104, National Association of Safety and Health Professionals (NASHP) Relevant ■ Downtown Derby Redevelopment, Derby, Connecticut Experience Supervised and managed an extensive Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Site Characterization study for the 22-acre Downtown Revitalization Zone (DRZ) in Derby Connecticut. This area of Derby Connecticut, south of Main Street and located at the confluence of the Housatonic and Naugatuck Rivers has long been considered the gateway to the Naugatuck River Valley. The competitive drive that powered the Naugatuck River Valley's rise to industrial prominence in the late 1800's — early 1900's led to the development of this area with factories and mills. The area currently consists of vacant lots, abandoned buildings, and some remaining industrial/commercial uses. A significant component, and one of the first steps, of the proposed redevelopment plan is to assess, remediate and remove the environmental impacts associated with the brownfield sites. BL Companies worked with the City of Derby and the Valley Regional Planning Agency to identify such environmental impacts, and to develop a remedial approach consistent and compatible with the proposed redevelopment plan for the DRZ. The scope of work included completion of a Phase I ESA and an extensive Phase II/III Site Investigation across the entire 22-acre DRZ. A preliminary Remedial Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared to achieve compliance with CT Remediation Standard Regulations, which will be revised and completed upon acceptance of the site redevelopment plan. V , Companies Samuel R. Haydock, LEP, PG Director, Northeast Environmental Operations ■ Downtown Torrington Master Plan, Torrington, Connecticut Supervised and managed an analysis of the potential environmental liabilities and costs associated with a concept plan prepared for the redevelopment and revitalization of downtown Torrington. The Preliminary Environmental Assessment (PEA) included an area comprising approximately 100 acres within the downtown section of the city. The PEA identified and grouped properties as low, moderate, and high risk based on existing and past uses, current regulatory status, and applicability of the Connecticut Transfer Act. The PEA identified potential liabilities and a preliminary estimate of the potential costs to address impacts to soil and ground water with hazardous or regulated substances from current and historic use of the properties within the study area. Preliminary cost estimates for the abatement of hazardous building materials also were included in the PEA. ■ Bridgeport Landing, Bridgeport, Connecticut Managed an analysis of potential environmental impacts and developed a Preliminary Remedial Action Plan for environmental compliance associated with the redevelopment of the Steel Point Peninsula in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The analysis included review of existing environmental studies and development of a preliminary approach for investigation and remediation to achieve compliance with the Connecticut Transfer Act and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) Remediation Standard Regulations. The analysis also included an evaluation of environmental impacts of the proposed redevelopment of the 50-acre peninsula, as required by the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act. Finally, the analysis included an evaluation of the permitting requirements and obstacles associated with redevelopment of the waterfront for public access and use as a marina, in the context of the CTDEP Office of Long Island Sound Program and the Connecticut Coastal Management Act. ■ Site Assessments / Characterization Supervised the completion of more than 600 Phase I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) on residential, commercial and industrial properties throughout New England, New York and New Jersey for individuals, developers, financial institutions, attorneys and municipalities. Developed standard protocols for Phase I ESAs, which meet or exceed ASTM and TASA guidelines. ■ NEPA/CEPA Compliance Supervised and managed the completion of several Environmental Impact Evaluations required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and state equivalents (Connecticut Environmental Policy Act, etc.) to evaluate potential impacts from State - sponsored urban redevelopment projects, HUD -sponsored Urban Blight Initiatives, highway and transportation improvement projects, and telecommunications tower facilities. Urban redevelopment impact studies have addressed such issues as exposure to pollutants, noise and air quality, impacts to sensitive resources, environmental justice, and socio-economic impacts. Tower siting studies have focused on Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, impacts to parklands, archeological resources, and wetlands and habitat. ■ Land Use Impact Studies, Statewide, Connecticut and Vermont Project Manager for many studies relating to the impact of development and construction to wetlands, rivers, upland streams, animal habitats, ground water and other sensitive receptors in Connecticut and Vermont. Tasks included field sampling, review of available published data, completion of permit applications, presentations at public hearings and interaction with state and local officials. El1. Companies Samuel R. Haydock, LEP, PG Director, Northeast Environmental Operations ■ Brownfields Assessments / Redevelopment Brownfields site assessments and redevelopment projects have been recently completed for the Cities of Ansonia, Bridgeport, Derby, Waterbury, and Torrington, and the Valley Regional Planning Agency. The Derby and Torrington projects have involved environmental analysis of large urban tracks with multiple owners and uses. Included was evaluating Connecticut Transfer Act and CTDEP RSR applicability and compliance at individual lots within the study area. Both projects involved establishing baseline conditions, risk analysis, public participation and relations, regulatory (CTA/CTDEP RSR) status, and options for remediation with associated costs. ■ Public High School, No. 2 Heating Oil Recovery System, Westbrook, CT Supervised removal of 15,000-gallon UST and installation of No. 2 heating oil recovery system at a high school in Westbrook. Project tasks included removal of tank, free product in the tank grave, and oil saturated soils; design, installation and operation/maintenance of a combined ground water pump and treat/product recovery system. Upon recovery of free product, installation and operation of air sparging and vacuum extraction system was completed to treat dissolved phase contamination. Interaction with and permitting from both local and state regulatory agencies was required throughout the project. ■ Eveready Manufacturing Facility, New England Directed the development of a site -wide management plan to deal with separate areas of solvent and heavy metal contamination in soil and ground water at Eveready's New England facility. Tasks associated with development of a site -wide management plan, which was approved by the State Department of Environmental Conservation, included determination of aerial and vertical extent of contamination and removal of contaminated soils (source areas); development of a ground water monitoring plan; and recommendation of ground water remedial options. ■ Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Assessment, New Jersey Conducted a WITS assessment at a former OCF landfill in accordance with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) approved work plan. The landfill contained Kaylo waste, which contained 12-14 percent asbestos and drums of unknown origin. Tasks associated with the assessment included: air photo evaluation; ground water monitoring well installation; ground water, surface water, surface soil and sediment sampling; and data evaluation and reporting. The investigation met the requirements of the NJDEP, demonstrated minimal impact to the environment and allowed OCF to proceed with cap placement and site closure. ■ Underground Storage Tank (UST) Removal / Remediation Directed UST removal at over 25 sites. At leaking UST sites, directed impacted soil removal and confirmation sampling. At many sites, conducted hydrogeological assessment program to determine the extent of petroleum contamination in shallow ground water detected following UST removal. Typical assessment program includes installation of shallow and deep monitoring wells, collection of soil and ground water samples, preparation of geologic cross -sections, installation of free product recovery system, excavation and disposal of petroleum -contaminated soils, interaction with local regulatory agencies and the design of a ground water recovery system for aquifer restoration, as needed. ■ CT Department of Environmental Protection, Storm Water Permitting, Connecticut Project Manager responsible for managing storm water permitting at several industrial sites in Connecticut. Project Management included budget development, client interfacing, storm V , Companies Samuel R. Haydock, LEP, PG Director, Northeast Environmental Operations water sampling, data analysis and application submittals. ■ Cable Manufacturing Facility, North Haven, CT Supervised full site characterization, remediation and post-remediation monitoring for a cable manufacturing facility. The project involved the installation of 32 shallow and deep monitoring wells, 22 additional soil borings and completion of an 81-point soil gas survey to delineate the source area and plume limits for PCE contamination. Upon removal of source area and completion of post-remediation ground water monitoring, provided LEP verification that the site was investigated and remediated in accordance with Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Standard Regulations. ■ Construction Services, Various Locations, Connecticut Managed environmental component of construction -related projects for the Connecticut Department of Transportation, the Bridgeport Water Pollution Control Authority and the City of Middletown. Services included pre -construction site characterization, development of work plans, development of Health and Safety plans, Health and Safety monitoring, and handling and disposal of contaminated materials. Assignments also included the treatment and discharge of contaminated ground water at sewer installation and highway improvement projects. ■ Geophysical Study, Torrington Landfill, Torrington, CT Directed geophysical investigations using an EM-34 ground conductivity meter to detect leachate plumes and potential leachate migration routes at industrial (RCRA) and municipal landfills in Torrington, as part of landfill closure. Evaluated surficial soils and bedrock cores in conjunction with geophysical data to determine the potential for plume migration to nearby wells. Also, directed other geophysical investigations utilizing an EM-31 ground conductivity meter and ground -penetrating radar to detect buried metallic objects and underground storage tanks. ■ Harbor Road Bridge Replacement, Fairfield, CT Environmental Manager during the permitting, design and replacement of the Harbor Road Bridge in Fairfield, Connecticut. This unique project involved the replacement of a two span historic bridge located at the confluence of the Mill River and Southport Harbor, and was complicated by the need to preserve a residence and office located in the middle of the river, between the two spans, and a stone dam and sluiceway constructed in the late 1800s and located beneath the bridge. Project planning included interfacing and coordinating with the Town of Fairfield, the ConnDOT, the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), and the local neighborhood preservation groups. Project tasks included identifying and surveying wetlands and sensitive habitat adjacent to and downstream of the bridge, sampling sediments in the work zone for the presence of regulated compounds, developing a sediment disposal work plan, preparing a CTDEP Structures Dredge and Fill Permit Application, preparing a ACOE Individual Permit Application, and developing a construction management plan to protect the wetlands and sensitive habitat. El1. Companies William R. Zimmerman Staff Scientist Experience/ Bill Zimmerman possesses more than eight years experience in the field of Environmental Science. Expertise His technical background includes completion of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Summary Assessments, aboveground and underground storage tank removal supervision, installation and operation/maintenance of pump and treat product recovery systems, RCRA/landfill inspections, landfill methane monitoring, test borings and monitor well installation, collection of soil and water samples, health and safety monitoring, FDIC mortgage inspections and soil gas surveys. Education/ AS in Environmental Science and Toxicology, Gateway Community Technical College, 1997 Registration Water Management Certificate Connecticut Water Works Association, Gateway Community Technical College, 1998 40-Hour Hazardous Materials Handling, Health and Safety Training CT Department of Public Health, Class I Distribution System Operator -in -Training CT Department of Public Health, Class 2 Water Treatment Plant Operator -in -Training Relevant ■ Skinner Road School, Vernon, CT Experience Monitored product and water levels associated with an operating pump and treat system for an underground fuel oil spill. Responsibilities included recovery system adjustment and maintenance and involved data table preparation for water level's and product thickness. ■ Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Systems, Statewide, Connecticut Installed and maintained carbon filter systems for the Department of Environmental Protection and clients homes and businesses that have contaminated water wells in Connecticut. ■ Electric Boat, Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT Tracked soil and water samples from the job site to the laboratory, then tracked the time for analysis to make sure the contract requirements were met. Created spreadsheets to monitor the process to ensure the laboratory was conducting the correct analysis. ■ Various Landfills, Statewide, CT Provided monthly and quarterly monitoring of groundwater levels sampled groundwater monitoring wells for required parameters, conducted monthly methane monitoring, and performed RCRA landfill inspection. ■ Mark IV Construction, Stratford and Bridgeport, CT Field Scientist responsible for monitoring worker health and safety during construction in zones identified to contain contaminated soil and/or groundwater. Supervised and directed the excavation, storage, handling, and disposal of contaminated materials encountered during sewer line and drainage line installations. Also monitored sampled, and maintained the water treatment system for the project at the Stratford site. ■ Newtown Plaza, Newtown, CT Maintained and monitored performance of an air sparging and vacuum extraction system installed to vent dry cleaning solvents in soil and groundwater. Performed quarterly groundwater sampling for contaminant levels and plume direction. V 1, Companies William R. Zimmerman Staff Scientist ■ Woodlake Condominiums, Woodbury, CT Monitored groundwater and piezometer levels during a Public Water System pump test for delineation of recharge areas and evaluation of the impact of pumping on nearby sensitive receptors. ■ United States Postal Service, Statewide, CT Supervised underground storage tank removals, tank grave sampling and backfilling for fuel oil tanks at seven post offices in Connecticut. Directed aboveground storage tank installations or gas conversions at these sites before the UST removal. Also carried out post work punch list inspections per USPS protocol. ■ New Haven Waste Transfer Station, New Haven, CT Performed monthly stormwater sampling and sampling of the tipping bay floor washdown water. ■ Middletown Water Supply, Middletown, CT Responsible for the installation of piezometers in and around the Roth Wellfield in preparation for a pump test to delineate recharge areas for the wellfield. Also helped install two weirs in the adjacent stream to measure stream flow during the test to evaluate impact of the wellfield on the stream. ■ Gas Station, Canton, CT Monitored and maintained the groundwater pump and treat system and associated air sparge and vacuum extraction system. Executed quarterly groundwater and post treatment sampling. ■ Oxbrook, Bridgeport, CT Supervised test borings for culvert relocation study, including soil logging and PID measurements of soils to evaluate the presence of volatile organic compounds. ■ Stop & Shop, Various Sites, CT Responsible for asbestos sampling for building demolition and characterization for lead content of demolition materials. ■ Public Water System, Old Lyme, CT Responsible for scheduling and sampling and reporting to the State Department of Public Health under the Connecticut Department of Public Health codes parameters for a public drinking water system. V 1, Companies Kelly Ann Hegarty Project Scientist Experience/ Kelly Hegarty has more than three years experience in the environmental consulting industry. Expertise Her technical background includes completion of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Summary Assessments, NEPA Compliance Assessments and collection of soil and water samples. Education/ BA in Physics, Adelphi University, 1996 Registration 40-Hour Hazardous Materials Handling, Health and Safety Training Relevant ■ Phase I, and II Environmental Site Assessments Experience Completed numerous Phase I, and II environmental site assessments (ESAs) on residential, commercial and industrial properties in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Florida for commercial interests and developers. ■ NEPA Compliance Completed numerous National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance assessments associated with the siting of telecommunications equipment per NEPA and the Telecommunications Act. NEPA compliance projects involve review of National and State Historic Registers, Flood Insurance and Wetlands maps, Federal and State Endangered/Threatened species lists and state archeological records, all to determine the potential effect on cultural and environmental resources from the construction of a tower. ■ Plastics Manufacturing Facility, Danbury, CT Completed Phase I, II, and III ESAs for the facility, which was determined to be a Hazardous Waste Establishment under Connecticut's Transfer Act. Site activities included soil sampling, monitoring well installation and sampling, and source area determination. ■ Shopping Center, Queens, NY Completed Phase I and II ESAs, which revealed a release of solvents from a former dry cleaning tenant. Performed a sensitive receptor survey of the surrounding area, conducted indoor air monitoring for perchloroethyelene in tenant spaces, installed ground water monitoring wells and aided in developing a work plan for further investigation of the site. ■ Septic System Study, Putnam County, NY Assisted in investigation of the effects of large septic systems on water quality and ground water flow patterns in a municipal water supply watershed. Performed bi-weekly groundwater sampling and constructed a groundwater model to explore the effects on groundwater flow. Bruce L. Bruso, Principal Fields of Competence Key Projects Occupational Health and Safety Certified Instructor Provided project design and Project management (International and Domestic) management on the first Site remediation design and implementation Pennsylvania State Superfund Corporate level responsibility for compliance and interface Emergency Action project. Innovative technology development Managed this interceptor trench, stabilization of soils and Business development (International and Domestic) overpacking of 150 leaking drums Experience Summary project from development of the More than 12 years of international and domestic professional field program and conceptual design through the project design experience providing site remediation and assessment services. and construction phase. Worked Performed project management during feasibility study, design directly with the project team from phase, and construction phase on numerous project sites ranging the PADEP and the Governor's from heavy industrial facilities, water and sewer treatment office so immediate threats to plants, sludge lagoons, power plants, storage tank facilities, groundwater were stabilized in 48 military bases and landfills. Project management design phase hours. services included remedial technology development and Provided Occupational Health & evaluation, professional testimony, field chemical applications, Safety as well as remediation occupational health and safety compliance training of over 3,000 expertise on a Due Diligence / individuals, and earthwork and compaction requirements. Acquisition at a German owned Project management constructionphase services included speciality steel manufacturing providing field recommendations in a timely manner to reduce facility being purchased in potential delays in construction schedules, and documenting and Pennsylvania. The assessment included definition of the recording observation and testing services. Treatability study occupational health and safety experience ranged from leading physical stabilization programs procedures, facility environmental on highly organic contaminated soils and heavy metal soils to setting, site historical background, development of field pilot programs. environmental conditions, and a variety of remediation scenarios Credentials and cost estimates based on state National Fire Academy - Hazardous Materials Response and federal regulatory Course work completed towards B.S., Environmental requirements. This information Engineering was utilized in the development of USEPA Hazardous Materials Team Certification final purchase figures. Certified Hazardous Materials Supervisor - Provided design and Harrisburg Community College,1988 implementation of an innovative Instructor - OSHA 1910.120 (q) soil treatment technology for a WTTI - Metallurgy,1984 CERCLA project (REGION 3) at an National Fire Academy - Certified Fire Fighter I existing Fortune 500 Communications manufacturer. Professional Affiliation The technology was implemented National Fire Protection and completed the target treatment Pennsylvania Hazardous Materials Technicians Assoc. objective under the State of New York (NYSDEC's) toughest soil treatment standard in the US. The site contained mixed contaminates including hazardous levels of metals and chlorinated VOC's. (continued over) Key Projects (continued) Provided project management for a Fortune 50 Automotive Component manufacturer in (Region 5). The client won an environmental award as a result of the use of the innovative soil treatment technology. All soils and concrete discovered were treated on site thereby eliminating off -site disposal. Remedial Action Work was performed under the voluntary cleanup program in conjunction with IDEM (State of Indiana). Provided PRP support on a feasibility study (FS) at an industrial facility's previous disposal area in the center of Metropolitan Milwaukee. Coordinated with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to develop and implement the CBA MITU soil treatment technology. This project is the highest publicly funded State Superfund cleanup in the history of the State of Wisconsin. The site contains a mixture of significant quantities of organic and inorganic compounds in soil to a depth of 45 feet BGS. Developed Remedial Action Plan that considered a unique in -place treatment remedy that allowed for a 60% cost savings to the State. As such, remediation costs were reduced by $6,000,000. Developed an innovative trenching design application for various vertical barrier systems and groundwater control at a Military Installation in Virginia. The evaluation entailed developing a detailed cost analysis and determining constructability for the options considered. Managed and participated in a treatability study program for In -SITU treatment of PCB contaminated soils and sediment on a Superfund project in the Mid -west. The project materials were contaminated with high concentrations of 1242 Aroclor. The treatability study provided a 68% reduction with the first application. The results are being further evaluated for full-scale implementation in combination with the MITU technology. Provided innovative chemical response training and facilities spill management evaluation for seven years running at various Military Installations. Continue to provide custom Occupational Health & Safety training to the US Army and US Air Force. Additional training includes crisis management training to high level ranking officers for disaster preparation. Clark A. Romberger Certifications Key Projects Pennsylvania Sewage Enforcement Officer I Provided site management on a Pennsylvania Hazardous Waste Fields of Competence Site Cleanup involving the in -situ Project management remediation of chlorinated solvent Site management and construction oversight impacted soils. Provided oversight OSHA compliance and "HAZWOPER" Instruction of all site work activities including Site remediation earth moving, soil treatment, Erosion control verification sampling, and health and safety Issues. Experience Summary Provided design recommendations Eight years of service in the United States Navy as a Cryptologic and technical expertise in the Technician holding a Top Secret security clearance. During this implementation of a groundwater time served at five different shore commands and aboard over treatment system utilized to five sea commands as a technician and Direct Support Team remediate a UST release site in Supervisor. Last three years of military service included serving Pennsylvania. Provided long term project management and oversight as an Instructor at a Naval Technical Training Center. Five years of operation and maintenance of of experience providing site management and construction.. the system. Ioversight involving hazardous waste site remediation projects, 1 groundwater treatment projects, wastewater treatment plant Provided project engineering and construction, and collection system installation. Provided assistance to project manager on a hazardous chrome rdia on detailed field documentation and supervised field crews during project in the state off In Indiana. a. site work activities. Project engineering services include design Developd and implemented cost phase of wastewater treatment facilities, sanitary sewer systems, tracking procedures for labor, computer modeling of water distribution systems, groundwater equipment and materials; this treatment, and site remediation. Project management through information was used to manage design, implementation, construction and closure of hazardous the overall project budget and waste remediation projects. Project management included ultimately allowed the project administering the project budget and recognizing and manager to make cost saving implementing cost saving avenues and procedures which can be decisions. passed to the Client. Provided project management during a soil remediation project of 1 Credentials a hazardous waste site which was B.S., Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, to be listed in the state of New 1996 York. The project involved the in - situ treatment of mixed hazardous Professional Affiliation waste, VOCs and heavy metals. Pennsylvania Association of Sewage Enforcement Officers Provided management and coordination of all site activities, and management of the project budget. Contaminated soil issues have been resolved on the site; I groundwater monitoring is to j continue; however, the site will not be added to the Potentially Most Hazardous Sites List In New York. (continued over) Key Projects (continued) Provided assistance on project management team for remediation project of a mixed hazardous waste site listed in the state of Wisconsin. Project involved in -situ remediation of chlorinated solvents and hexavalent chrome on the largest state funded project to date in Wisconsin. Integral part of project team decision making and problem solving process on earthmoving, soil treatment, decontamination, health and safety, and budgetary issues. Project is still active and ongoing. Performed field engineering and construction oversight during the installation of a .75MGD wastewater treatment facility and during the installation of over 21 miles of collection system. Provided detailed field documentation and reviewed payment quantities and requests. Conducted I & I study for a small municipality in southeastern Pennsylvania. Study included evaluation of pump station capacities, determining and identifying locations of potential causes, recommending various solutions, and oversight of implementing selected remedy. APPENDIX F Griffin Site Monitoring Report a SITE MONITORING REPORT - former Bouyea-Fassetts Bakery FEBRUARY 2003 Site Location: Former Bouyea-Fassetts Bakery 1805 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT GI Project 4 791468 VTDEC 90-0485 Prepared for: Mr. Jim McKeown George Weston Bakeries 255 Business Center Drive Horsham, PA 19044 Prepared By: 171 Commerce Street Suite • 10, P.O. Box 943 • Williston, VT 05495 • (802) 8654288 • fax 802 657-4129 email: info@griffin-intl.com - web. www.griffin-intl.com Site Monitoring Report Former Bouyea-Fassetts, South Burlington, Vermont TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.40. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 2.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING......................................................................................................1 2.1 SrrE CONDITIONS................................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 'DF-TERMINATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT ............................................. 1 2.3 tGROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSUS...................................................................... 2 3.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................3 4.0 RIECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Maps Site Location Map Drawing 1: Site Map Drawing 2: Groundwater Contour Map, 01/21/03 Drawing 3: Contaminant Distribution Map 01/21/03 APPENDIX B — Liquid Level Monitoring Data APPENDIX C — Groundwater Summary Data APPENDIX D - Analytical Data GI Project 79146n February 2003 VT DEC #90-0485 Page i Site Monitoring Report JrFFLY Former Bouyea-Fassetts, South Burlington, Vermont October 1998 monitoring event. However, in review of the historical liquid level monitoring data, as plotted in Appendix B, the current groundwater elevations are within the range of historical data. Water table elevations from the January 21, 2003 monitoring event were plotted on the Site Map to generate the Groundwater Contour Maps presented in Appendix A. Based upon the elevation data of these six wells the flow gradient is estimated at roughly 4% towards the north. This flow direction is generally consistent with the previous monitoring data and the calculated gradient is higher than previous monitoring data. 2.3 Groundwater Sample Collection and Analysis Groundwater samples were collected from five of the ten on -site monitoring wells immediately following well gauging on January 21, 2003. The well containing LNAPL was not sampled. Groundwater samples were analyzed for the presence of VOCs per EPA Method 802113. Results of the laboratory analyses are summarized in Appendix C. The analytical data report is presented in Appendix D. A contaminant distribution map is presented in Appendix A. All samples were collected according to Griffin's groundwater sampling protocol, which complies wiith industry and state standards. No contaminants were detected in the trip blank sample. A duplicate was collected from MW-2. The relative percent difference (RPD) of the two samples collected from MW-2 was calculated for each detected contaminant. The RPD was less than 25% for each compound indicating acceptable data precision. Surrogate recoveries were acceptable in each of the samples indicating minimal matrix interference. It appears that adequate Quality Assurance/Quality Control was maintained throughout sample collection and analysis. As illustrated in the contaminant distribution map in Appendix A, MW-6 contained LNAPL and monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5, and MW-7 were located within the gasoline plume source area in which relatively high dissolved contaminant concentrations were detected, above the Vermont Groundwater Enforcement Standards (VGES). MW-6 contained 1.15 feet of LNAPL. MW-6 has historically contained LNAPL, however, the last monitoring event during which LNAPL was defected in this well was August 1995 at which time there was only 0.02 feet of LNAPL. The former gasoline UST at the site was removed in August 1996 and there is no evidence to indicate that there has been any release subsequent to the documented 1991 release. Total BTEX and total VOC concentrations in MW-2 and MW-5 have decreased since the previous monitoring event of October 1998. Contaminant concentrations in the downgradient monitoring wells, MW-10 and MW-11, were below laboratory detection limits. Contaminant concentrations in MW-11 had decreased since the previous monitoring event. Contaminant concentrations in MW -7 have increased since the previous monitoring event but are within the historical range of concentrations measured in this well. Based upon the apparent decrease in contaminant concentration at MW-2, MW-5 and MW-11 it appears that the plume is stable and does not appear to be migrating downgradient to the source area. However, the contaminant concentrations within the source area remain high. G1 Project 791468 February 2003 VT DEC #90-0485 page 2 MAPS CB-3 KING LI M, PAVE t EGENn M 0 3 MONITORING WELL CB-6 CATCH BASIN ®2 M MANHOLE JOBS #h 791468 VTDEC #, 90-0485 l7RIFFIN INTERNATIONAL FORMER-BDUYEA F-ASSETS 1805 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SITE MAP DATE, 2/3/03 1 DWG #, 1 1 SCALE, 1'=50' DRN.i DEM APP., D CB-3 I ;KING L M PAV MW-2� N 90.53' ® MONITORING WELL WITH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (ft) ■ C13-6 CATCH BASIN M®2 MANHOLE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (Ft) (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) JUB #1 791468 --- °-D4E35 FORMER-BQUYEA FASSETS IB05 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLkNGTON, VERMONT GROUNDWATER CONTOUR HIAP MEASUREDi 1/21/1 ➢ATEi 2/3/03 1 DVG #1 2 1 SCALE, 1'=5(Y DRN,+ DEM APP.- DE CB-3 a (ING LO MG PAVE LEGEND MW-2 MONITORING WELL WITH TOTAL TARGETED VOCs 12,1200 CONCENTRATION (ppb) (M=6021B0 0 CB-6 CATCH BASIN M®2 MANHOLE �1,000\ ISO -CONCENTRATION CONTOUR (ppb) (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) LNAPL LIGHT NON -AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID N➢ NONE DETECTED IOB #, 79146E VTDEC #1 90-0435 FORMER-BDUYEA FASSETS 1805 SHELBURI I E ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT RI FFI N CONTAMINANT DIST TBUTION MAP SAMPLED- 1/21/C DATE, 2/3/03 1 DWG #1 3 1 SCALES 1'=50' DRN.j DEM APP., D No Text LIQUID LEVEL MONITORING DATA t �:t - rs 6 �! ,. it+, ' ..... oV-:� GROUNDWATER SUMMARY DATA Griffin International GI Project 791468 former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT MW-2 Groundwater Monitorincl, EPA Method 8021B PARAMETER 10/29/98 1 /21 /03 VGES Benzene 5 Toluene . :30� �, i ; * �;, � ; 1,000 Eth (benzene 570. 520. 700 X lenes 1,980 2,010 10,000 Total BTEX 14,680 10,440 - 1,3,5-Trimeth 1 Benzene ND(<200.) ND(<100.) 4 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene TBQ I<200.) b „ 5 MTBE jMaMINO �ND(<1100.11 40 Na hthalene ND(<200.) 20 Total Targeted VOCs 17,050 12,120 veto = vermoni urounowaier tnrorcement atanoaro wanuary zwul ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) ,n 140,000 a g 120,000 c 100,000 80,000 60,000 40.000 (j 20,000 M W-2 O '- N CO 'r to Co t` CO (T C) a-- N Cn a) a) 0) tT tT tT tT tT Q7 C? C) C) 2 :2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 :E Date F- + TTotal BTEX Samples collected prior to 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Sampled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 6021 B Griffin International GI Project 791468 former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT MW-5 Groundwater Monitorina- EPA Method 8021 B PARAMETER 10/29/96 1 /21 /03 VGES Benzene ':'Ja� :.qf'" G:# '�3�°a 5 Toluene 557 216 1,000 Eth (benzene 4119;; . W-00;° ,, 700 X lenes 1 4,860 1 3,480 10,000 Total BTEX 7,847 5,040 - 1,3,5-Trimeth I Benzene 4 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene 5 MTBE ND(< 500) >jt 40 Naphthalene ', R a �4 .. 20 Total Targeted VOCs 10,528 1 9,163 - VGES = Vermont Groundwater Entorcement Standard (January ZUUU) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) MW-5 70,000 a 60,000 50,000 c 40,000 30,000 20,000 e 0 10,000 0 O CDN N M M 't "f 0 M O �p f` r` N M M M O O N N O M O Q) O T O O O M T O T T T m T T T O O O 4 O Cl 6 7 6 C v C d C N C N -CC N a N C N C N C d C N C 6 p - 0 O -� O -� O CIp 0 Date —s— Total BTEX Samples collected prior to 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Sampled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 8021 B Griffin International GI Project 791468 former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT MW-R rrnllndwnter Mnnitnrinn. EPA Method 8021B PARAMETER 10/29/98 1 /21 /03 VGES Benzene ;F6QU`" FREE PRODUCT 1.15 FEET 5 Toluene 1,000 Eth (benzene `' 'r,:;6Q„ ', 700 X lenes r tQ , , 10,000 Total BTEX 37,860 - 1,3,5-Trimeth I Benzene 721 4 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene 2,300 5 MTSE StDRri2'Fo-crDl` 40 Na hthalene 1,020 20 Total Targeted VOCs 41,901.0 VGES = Vermont Ciroundwater tntorcement Standard (January ZUUU) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) 90,000 60,000 n 70,000 60,000 50,000 L° 40,000 30,000 a 20,000 U 10,000 0 o N m O) D C C 3 7 MW-6 M V Ln CD r co o) O N m T 9, 9, rn rn 1, o 0 0 c c c c c c c c c c Date -+- Total BTEX -w- Free Product Thickness Samples collected prior to 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Sampled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 8021 B 1.4 1.2 1 (D 0.8 m y 0.6 Y u 0.4 t 0.2 0 Griffin Intzernational l GI Projectt 791468 - former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT MW-7 Groundwater Monitorina. EPA Method 8021 B PARAMETER 10/29/98 1/21/03 VGES Benzene ` ' 00 F 5 Toluene OR i3,^ 4' ` 1,000 Ethy (benzene, , ' _ 647 700 X henes 2,410 1 4,600 1 10,000 Total BTEX 5,272 8,863 1,3„5-Trimethyl Benzene IN,— • .°1 4 1,2„ 4-Trim ethyl Benzene In v 5 MTSE ND(<200)- 40 Na h1halene 20 Tot,Targeted VOCs 6,374 11,263 vut,,3 = vermont L3rounowater tntorcement Standard (January 2000) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shatded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) 30,000 roe.• = w ft3 w• .. ! ., : s 25,000 i� yle 4u'� ,.�rn�d 3 eaYi`iK�ia .• r d .. itira sre r& 20,000 ! y � "gr�', rr,�- i �t " r� 8, r t�:i�Y���� �y��f ,� � � � 15,000 1 � ' �. �� �?yr t Ja• 10,000 .�1l. a'1F 'wG 'F..1•dA �u�,lEg ? t' S+x.1. cD 5,000 x,. 4 Fi '"'f +r( .,"Jq{, y}p,"f ¢�� `�pg,y� i✓•�LYc��' T�S,,� 9 lT+�,}���yln�e"Yni'+^��h'il!yµ.�,y�µF�y,��tt.�� bi �'.. T!r �','�4� y,�•� 4�15(Fs� { ��i�)b'FVV`((StIS,Y ��G �u;�� 1 Date Sarraples collected prior to 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Sampled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 8021 B Griffin International GI Project 791468 former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT MW-10 Groundwater Monitoring, EPA Method 8021 B PARAMETER 10/29/98 1 /21 /03 VGES Benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 5 Toluene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 1,000 Eth (benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 700 X lenes ND(< 1) ND(<2.0) 10,000 Total BTEX ND ND - 1,3,5-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 4 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 5 MTBE ND(<10) ND(<2.0) 40 Naphthalene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 20 Total Targeted VOCs ND ND votes = vermoni urounawater tworcement 5tanaara (January zuuu) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) [MYSUC 1.2 n 1.0 a � 0.8 0 LU U.K) a�i 0.4 U 0 0.2 V 0.0 < cPao' F�� PJo' e zz PEA e�� PEA ��� PJo' ��° Qom°' ��° QJ°' ��° Qom°' ��° Pam°' �zo Pam°' Date F-—Total BTEX Samples collected prior to 10/29/96 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Sampled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 6021 B Griffin .International IGI Projlerct 791468 former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT h911w-11 Groundwater Monitorina. EPA Method 8021B PARAMETER 10/29/98 1121/03 VGES Benzene ND(< 1.0) 5 Toluene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 1,000 Et1h (benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 700 X lenes ND(< 1) ND(<2.0) 10,000 Total BTEX 8.6 ND - 1,:3,5-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 4 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 5 M7BE 25.1 ND(<2.0) 40 Mai hthalene ND(< 1) ND(< 1.0) 20 Total Targeted VOCs 33.7 ND - VGES = Vermont Groundwater Enforcement Standard (January 2000) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES AIII Values Reported in ug/I (ppb) 615 fin`.;,,y as [ R'^ $ �h P + � s .> i i Jr .it f I " i`RON JI a..1 ` • # 5 , ri �1��..., ^�Y Y, �i�"'e {ri4i ,, r v s�v by � r7'uyt Q� r �u � r P +3 f r � F r� ��,f?'. ��ca ! +"f'-aFe.'A� L '�t{)��Xi i.' ktn i iM. PiJAC";(l�'�i a �.�I�!j,M,�j� Se. 'rfdur'S J,iy 5 7"�' y�,y, �'!§+ �w i (}lbiYw. T tytjy,lY'.'y�.�, ,G�' d Y_'i]`I�L�f2�vs$�iYrA+�i.0 .L}'y�T f 4 x � Ri. !� �° ,t"Fi .6�t r ( 1 i �4'-T 0""J•dR'1 h. Yt, fY iF4 �Ysl�.� �I{.:�,i�+wr��yp � � ':r>r.�'�i. � ��"+�'r,�'",{'s''��'a�`w"9i ... ?��.w`'�a'�"u�,'s?�a'�,":(8`+.? . ��t ,..ss.'�s-'�`t-.�„' e� ,rt��tT�'a���m 2���`�_�•. .. e Samples collected prior to 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 602 Saimpled collected beginning on 10/29/98 were analyzed by EPA Method 8021 B Griffin Invernatioroal GI Project 79146B former Bouyea-Fassetts 1805 Shelburne Rd, South Burlington, VT Quality Assurance / Quality Control Samples, 1/21/03 PARAMET1 R Trip Blank MW-2 Duplicate RPD Benzene ND(< 1.0) 30 8 % To6vene ND(< 1.0) 80 2t3. 11 % Eth (benzene ND(< 1.0) 520. 614 17% X Aenes ND(<2.0) 2,010 2,360 16% Total BTEX ND 10,440 11,564 10% 1,3,5-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1.0) ND(< 100.) ND(< 100.) N/A 1,2,4-Trimeth I Benzene ND(< 1.0) rf. 'AD MCI! 23% MTBE ND(<2.0) 0'.. 3% Na hthalerne ND(< 1.0) ND(< 100.) ND( < 100.) NIA Total Targeted VOCs ND 12,120 13,346 10% VGES = Vermont Groundwater Enforcement Standard (January 2000) ND - Not Detected, TBQ - Trace Below Quantitation Limit Shaded areas indicate concentrations which are equal to or exceed the applicable VGES All Values F.eported in ug/I Ippb) ANALYTICAL DATA X11J I I V 9/Nc. Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 LABORATORY REPORT FAX 879-7103 Griffin International PO Box 943 Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Donna Lazerak PROJECT: Former Bouyea Fassetts/791468 ORDER ID: 21395 RECEIVE DATE: January 22, 2003 REPORT DATE: January 27, 2003 Enclosed please find the results of the analyses performed for the samples referenced on the attached chain of custody. Different groups of analyses may be reported under separate cover. All samples were prepared and analyzed by requirements outlined in the referenced methods and within the specified holding times. All instrumentation was calibrated with the appropriate frequency and verified by the requirements outlined in the referenced methods. Blank contamination was not observed at levels affecting the analytical results. Analytical method precision and accuracy was monitored by laboratory control standards which include matrix spike, duplicate and quality control analyses. These standards were determined to be within established laboratory method acceptance limits, unless otherwise noted. Reviewed by, �/� �7 Special Reporting Instructions: (G eq—+'&'S,� S i --Pe; x-tingAddress: ri` � Hitting Address: 0 Company: Gr lj' Contact Name/Phone #: �p�� �R x Sampler Name: Phone #: 01, Jc" _ de,,:,fication Matrix G B 1V P at ime I Sample Containers Field Results/RemarksRusl Analysis Required Sample Preservation No. Type/Size = L2 GL -- • �,S l t I '03 57 ---Bate/rim K ci cd by: Dnte Received 3 CI r 5' /z t/0� h _ No Requested Analyses t 11 Total Solids 16 Sulfate ? 1 1664 TPH/FOG 26 8270 PAH P 12 TSS 17 Coliform (Spccify) 22 8015 GRO 27 PP13 Metals D" . P 13 TDS 18 COD 23 8015 DRO 28 RCRA8 Metals 14 Turbidity 9 8021B 24 8260/8260B 29 linity 15 Conductivity 20 8010/8020 25 8270 B/N or Acid 30 = FAI, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, TI, V, Zr semi-volatiles, metals, pesticides, herbicides) 33 (White, Yellow, Pink Copy - Laboratory / Goldenrod Copy - Client) Date/I'ime LAB USE ONLY Delivery; 4C �-}-- Temp: Q Comment: ,e Jar.„,k,. 11 , , .. Ime Sai-nr 143iM ^ � uaic ,,,,. ,. w TimcS.MIed: T!z'PM `-'- p, .,.. Time nn iplccr.---7:57 APr"' --- Analysis Date: 1/24103 Analysis Date: 1/24103 Analysis Date: 1124103 anrneter Results P Paramet Results upi Parameter results tj MTBE 1,440. MTBE < 2.0 MTBE < 2.0 Bea me 6,730, Benzene < 1.0 Benzene < 1.0 Tolame 1,180. Toluene < 1.0 Toluene < 1.0 Ethjlbenzene 520. Ethylbenzene < 1.0 Ethylbcnzenc < 1.0 Xylcmcs, Total 2,010. Xylenes, Total < 2.0 Xylenes, Total < 2.0 ^ y 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene < 100. 240. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Belzeae 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene < 1.0 < 1.0 1,3,5 1i°6tthyl Betlzmd 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene r, 1.0 < 1.0 Naphthalene < 100. Naphthalene < 1.0 Naphthalene < 1.0 UIP^s 3. UIP's 0. UIP's 0. Surmxate 1 97.% Surrogate 1 99.% Surrogate 1 100.% Site: MW-5 Site: MW-11 Ref. Number. 205780 Ref. Number: 205783 Date Sampled: 1/21/03 Date Sampled: 121/03 Time Sampled: 1:36 PM Time Sampled: 2:36 PM Analyrsis Date: 1/24/03 Analysis Date: 1/24/03 paramreter Results u¢I[ Parameter Results ueJL MTBE 426. MTBE < 2.0 Benzene 470. Benzene < 1.0 Toluene 216. Toluene < 1.0 EthyM>cnzene 874. Ethylbenzene < 1.0 Xylenes, Total 3,480. Xylenes, Total < 2.0 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 967. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene < 1.0 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 2,730. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene < 1.0 Naphthalene 555. Naphthalene < 1.0 UIP's > 10. UIP's 0. Surto to 1 93 % Surrogate 1 103.% Site: MW-7 Site: Duplicate Ref. Number 205781 Ref. Number: 205784 Date Sampled: 1/21/03 Date Sampled: 1/21/03 Time Sampled: 1:45 PM Time Sampled: 1:03 PM Analysis Date: 1/24/03 Analysis Date: 1/24/03 , Paramteter Results u¢/1 Parameter Results ueJL MTBE 216. MTBE 1,480. Benzene 506. Benzene 7,270. Toluene 3,110. Toluene 1,320. Ethyffienzene 647. Ethylbenzene 614. Xylenes, Total 4,600. Xylenes, Total 2,360. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 574. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene < 100. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 1,610. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 302. Naphthalene 329. Naphthalene < 100. UIP's > 10. UIP's 3. Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX G BL Companies Bopping Loge and Laboratory Data Results BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-1 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite Page: 1 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time BL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" Date Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Wt 130 pounds G.S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Saiin 1e Data k F c o o �4 DeP#h (feet SPT31oty44 Gaunts(Blows/6 to Pies c c p Sample 1€?escrtptton Classzl3catton (ModrfiedBurniistcr Stratum Descr.i tion PID Renlarlcs S-1 24 0-2 INo Recovery Rock in Top S-2 1 24 1 18 1 2-4 1 1Gray SiltyClay, Trace Fine Gravel I 115.4 5 S-3 1 24 1 24 1 4-6 1 JGray Silty Clay, Odor noted @ 5.2t 1255. 1 10 S-4 1 24 1 24 1 6-8 1 1 Gray Silty Clay, Tittle Fine Gravel (Odor) * 734.0 IS S-5 1 24 1 24 1 8-10 1 JWet Silty Clay, little Fine Gravel 141.0 Wet @ 8.0± eoe 10' t 1 20 END OF EXPLORATION 30 R E * Sent to Endyne Labs M A R K S `.tratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under onditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-2 rchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 2 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization oreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" Date Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Sate 'le Bata: °' a a ShT ;Blow , DePf. Counts(B1ows/6 Sarn�le nesrrtption & Ctasstficatinn {feet) tnehes� (fylodiCed! urrnister) ., . Stratum riesert tion -PM Remarks: S-1 24 6 0-2 Brown F-C Sand, some F-C Gravel, Trace Silt 7.1 Clayey Silt, Brown/Gray, Trace Fine Gravel 1.4 S-2 24 24 2-4 " 5 I S-3 24 24 4-6 Wet Brown/Gray Clayey Silt, Trace Fine Gravel 2.9 10 S-4 24 18 6-8 Brown F-C Sand, little silt, Trace Fine Gravel Wet 2.4 eoe 8.0± 15 20 25 END OF EXPLORATION 30 R E No sample collected for analysis M A R K S 'Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury (355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-3 Page: 3 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches I Other Mobile B-50 Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization Time "e Satm a Data :::...: Sample Description & Classzf�catton ':. (N1odI led:$urm ster Stratum:Descri ti.orz. PID Remarks u:. �,.. tla Meet Caunts........ Riows/6' tnches j 10 115 I 20 125 I 30 S-1 24 8 0-2 Brown F-C Sand, Some Fine Gravel, Little Silt Gray Clayey Silt, Trace Fine Gravel Silty Sand, Gray Wet @ 6.0± Brown F-C Sand, Silt Cobbles, No Odor eoe 8f 5.3 5.0 2.4 1.7 S-2 24 16 2-4 S-3 24 24 4-6 S-4 24 18 6-8 END OF EXPLORATION R E lNo M �A R K S sample collected for analysis 'tratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury I355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-4 Page: 4 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing (Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" LLe Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization Time Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds IG.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 G Sate le )date: Sample Desar�ption �C Ctass�f�catton (Nlodiftei3Burrtister Stratum Descr.i tiott I'ID. 'Reinarks ?; �. . Depth SPT glow' Gounts(I3low�/b tn�3ses) j {I �5 f 10 �15 20 25 �I 1 I1 ! 30 S-1 24 8 0-2 6" Brown F-C Sand, F-C Gravel, Little Silt, 2" Gray C Silt Brown/Gray, Clayey Silt, Slight Odor Same as above, slight oder Same as above with no gravel, slight odor Same as above with decreasing from slight odor at top of sample to no odor at bottom Wet @ 8.0± eoe 10' f * ------------------------ 5.4 393.0 653.0 189.0 53.7 S-2 24 18 2-4 S-3 24 24 4-6 S-4 24 24 6-8 S-5 24 24 8-10 END OF EXPLORATION R E M �A R K C * Sample sent to Endyne Labs 1tratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-5 Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 5 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water I Depth Time 10 S-4 1 24 1 24 1 6-8 1 ISame as above, No Gravel, Very Slight Odor at Top 1 472 15 S-5 1 24 1 24 1 8-10 1 ji 12" Same as above, 12" Gray Fine Sand & Soil * 483 t 20 I-�eoe10.0 I25 1 i i i if ------------------------- END OF EXPLORATION 30 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R K S Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sun, 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-6 Page: 6 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water BL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" Date Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Casing Depth Stabilization Time :....... c» Sarxi ae ... . :. :Sample Ilescrtption & C iassificatton (IVIodtfi'eurmister SfratuN:Desert tton FID Remarks F c of v° bepth {feet T Slo SP. w:: 'Gounta f>}lowsi� tnches) S-1 24 12 0-2 4" Asphalt, 8" Sand F-C and Gravel Gray Clayey silt (odor) 11.8 450 S-2 24 16 2-4 5 S-3 1 24 1 24 1 4-6 lummmm 15 S-5 1 24 1 18 1 8-10 20 1 25 Same as above (odor) Same as above 6" Same as above 2" F-C Sand & Silt, Trace Gravel 10" Gray Fine Sand & Silt Wet C 9.0 ORDER IN THIS LAYER 2000+ 19.8* END OF EXPLORATION 30 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R K S Stratification iincs represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. I BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-7 architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 7 Invironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 031-821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Fnreman Mike McGinlev Tvoe Snlit S000n Date Time to water I Depth Time IS S-3 1 24 1 24 1 4-6 1 1 Brown clayey silt, odor at top of sample only * 237 10 S-4 24 18 6-8 13" Same as above 436 5" Fine Sand, Little Silt, Odor at Top of Sand Layer 1 15 eoe 8.0' 0 ``2 1` i 25 ------------------------ L END OF EXPLORATION 30 R iE * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M IA R K I � 'tratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under (conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-8 rchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 8 environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: PI .(800)301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 IGroundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization reman Mike McGinley Type Split SpoonDate Time to water Depth Time Rep.Bill CaL Zimmerman Diameter 2" "ite Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds VS. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches { f Other Mobile B-50 i Sam le Data u; d T. to `' w depth Gaunts.(13i6ws[G Sntple Description & Classification . A rs o: (feet [aches) :' (I�odlfied Burrriister StratD um escri tion PII) Re inarks S-1 24 7 0-2 7" Asphalt, No Recovery No Recovery S-2 24 0 2-4 15 S-3 1 24 1 24 1 4-6 ffi®®= I S-5 1 24 1 24 1 8-10 1 1 ' 15 20 25 30 Brown Clayey Silt Same as above 8" Same as above Wet 16" Gray Fine Sand, Some Silt, No Detectable Coe 10.0 END OF EXPLORATION 15.0 15.9 13.6 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M I A ` R i K S [ratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. L BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-9 Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 9 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time !BL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" IDate Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer WeiF 130 pounds IG.S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches { Other Mobile B-50 Sanri le Data . u; . �. SYT $low depth Gogrlts (131ows/l; Sample Descrtpfion & C.... ficatton cy :o „� (feet tn�►?es) (N1od>fieii$urmster Sfratum:Descrt tiort . PID Remarks; S-1 24 16 0-2 6" Asphalt, 10" Brown F-C Sand, Little F-C Gravel 14.1 Little Silt S-2 24 24 2-4 Gray Brown Clayey Silt, Slight Odor 3.5-4.0 93.6 Clayey Silt I0" 5 i Same as above; Odor * 1895.0 S-3 24 24 4-6 MM®M / 15 1 20 ' 25 i 18" Fine Brown Sand, Little Fine Gravel, Little Silt Gray -bin, 6" Clayey silt Coe 8.0 ......................... END OF EXPLORATION 173.0 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R K 1 S Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. 1 BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-10 rrchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 10 nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 (355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing (Boring Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" _)ate Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Groundwater Data Depth Casing Stabilization Time to water I Deoth I Time Sam je Data: C, e h.:. ... io &:. . assii cation P . Counts f>31ows/G Sample lies >. t. n G . d.; d d h A ;o; a Meet iriclies) (1Vlodtfiet Ilurmister Stratun .peseripti.o>x PID. Renzarlcs S-1 24 16 0-2 6" Asphalt 10" F-C Brown Sand, Little F-C Gravel, Little Silt I S-2 24 i 18 2-4 Gray Brown, Clayey Silt 15 S-3 1 24 1 22 1 4-6 mmm®m I S-5 1 24 1 24 18-10 1 I 25 30 8" Brown Fine Sand, Little Silt, Odor 14" Brown Gray Clayey Silt Brown Gray, No Odor, Clayey Silt 3" Brown F-C Sand & Gravel, Little Silt 21" Brown Gray Clayey Silt eoe 10.0 12.4 * 63.5 10.4 15.2 END OF EXPLORATION R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R K S _ Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under 1conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. I JBL COMPANIES rchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite environmentalSciences Analytical Services Land Sury I355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-11 Page: 11 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont (Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing oreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization "rime ,• A Sabi I Data . Sample) scriF. pt an S Ciassif 6dion (lYlodifiect'BurrtiiSter Stratum Descri tion . PJJ Rewadks'i a : Z: z o y °� t Depth (feet ... talon Ga.....(l lows/ tR�es) IS-1 24 12 0-2 White crushed stone Same as above Not Sampled 0.8 S-2 1 24 1 12 2-4 I5 S-3 1 24 1 12 4-6 Same as above; Wet 14" Brown Gray Clayey Silt 10 S-4 1 24 1 4 1 6-8 1 i Same as above; wet '15 I S-5 1 24 1 4 1 8-10 1 1 I S-6 1 24 1 6 1 10-12 1 1 Me ®mo� I S-8 1 24 1 8 1 14-16 1 1 25 30 Same as above 2 1 " Brown Gray Clayey Silt Same as above Samae as above 2" White Stone, Wet 6" Gray F-M Sand and Silt eoe 16.0 * Tank Grave 10.4 Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled Not Sampled * 17.3 END OF EXPLORATION R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M 1 R K c itratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 -h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-12 Page: 12 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing oreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/07/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds IG.S. Elevation Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches IOther Mobile B-50 Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization Time I w... sate , le Data; ... .f c to e'D scr' tass� i at n Sampl e �ptton $ � (iVlodifed Burm ster Stratum Deser Pion 1?ID. Remarks .: �.. �... F , . . p.: .d ..; Apt . i(feet `P 1 o Countst131awsl� inches) I 5 I 10 15 I I20 1 25 ` 30 S-1 24 8 0-2 White crushed stone Brown Silty Clay with Trace F-C Sand Brown Clayey Silt with Trace F-C Gravel (Odor) Brown Clayey Silt, Trace Fine Gravel Same as above Same as above (wet) eoe 12'-0 Not Sampled * ......................... 5.6 162.0 694.0 374.0 681.0 S-2 24 10 2-4 S-3 24 11 4-6 S-4 24 9 6-8 S-5 24 24 8-10 S-6 24 24 10-12 END OF EXPLORATION R i E M A R K S * Sample sent to Endyne Labs tratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. JBL COMPANIES Irchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury I355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 I h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number. SB-13 Page: 13 Project Number: 03L821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont if Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing ore man Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weip 130 pounds iG.S. Elevation Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches IOther Mobile B-50 Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization Time I_ Sam le Data:: Sample Deserlption & Class fiCa on (IUlodiferl l3urm ster' Stratum Descri Hon . PSI) Remarks' a Depth SPT flow Goun s f>3ioWsr Eic;> IS-1 24 16 0-2 6" Asphalt, 10" Brown F-C Gravel, F-C Sand and, Lit Gray Olive Clayey Silt, Trace Fine Gravel 12.7 17.4 S-2 24 14 2-4 Its S-3 24 22 4-6 Brown Clayey Silt, Odor r 10 S-4 24 16 6-8 9" Same as above, 7" Brown/Gray FM Sand and Silt, Slight Odor f 11 eoe 8/0 15 27.6 * 165.4 20 25 ------------------------- { END OF EXPLORATION L 30 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M CA R K �C �,ratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and tinder conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. BL COMPANIES Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-14 Page: 14 Project Number: 031-821 Checked By: 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) South Burlington Chittenden County, Vermont Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Foreman Mike McGinley F3L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Date Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 G.S. Elevatiot� Datum Casing Type Split Spoon Diameter 2" Hammer Weig 130 pounds Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile, B-50 Groundwater Data Date Time Depth to water Casing Depth Stabilization Time Sari le Ilat iw; , Caunts(Btows/6 Sample Descrtptian 8 Glusstficatton cth o tx (>€eet inch s) (Nlodtfietl Burniister Stratum ilescri Pion P�U Rewarks. S-1 24 14 0-2 4" Asphalt, 10" Brown F-C Sand & Gravel, Little Silt Not Sampled F-C Sand &Gravel, Little Silt 8.9 S-2 24 3 2-4 MMMMM ISH f 15 20 1 25 30 Same as above & Wet eoe 6.0 No Sample Collected END OF EXPLORATION 12.1 R E M I A -� R K }S Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. i BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-15 Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 15 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 031-821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time 3L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" Date Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches I Other Mobile B-50 Sam I Date: .. `C: J3, to ......::. c. ° ° Iepth Count${>3taws/ ':`:Sample Ile.... .iun & .... .1f c . -04 d :d .:: .S. (11lodtiied'Burmster StratunDescri lionII7 Remarks: 24 11 0-2 2" Asphalt, 9" Brown F-C Sand & Gravel, Little Silt Not Sampled rS_2s,11 2" F-C Sand, 6" Brown/Gray Clayey Wet Silt 29.3 24 8 2-4 1 j S-3 24 3 4-6 Brown Clayey Silt & Fine Gravel Wet ` S-4 24 18 6-8 Same as above, Dry Il 10 ` S-5 24 12 8-10 F-C Gravel & Sand, Brown Clayey Silt, Wet 15 eoe 10.0 Ii NO SAMPLE ANALYZED !i 20 Perched Water 110.1 51.2 16.3 END OF EXPLORATION 30 I R E M A R K c � tratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. I BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-16 Vchitecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 16 ?nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 031-821 I355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data (Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time 1,L Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" 'Date Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioe Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 Sarni le Data . �.. SPT ]Blow ., n. aepitt Grunts. Rlows/� Sample �escriptian cC Ctasszf cakton :, c :c.x (teat tnct«s? (iVodiCedBurmi;ster Stratum Descri tion PIll: Remarks S-1 24 11 0-2 Brown clayey silt Not Sampled S-2 Same as above, with Some Fine Sand 19.2 24 8 2-4 �5 j S-3 Same as above without Fine Sand 13.5 24 3 4-6 S-4 Same as above, Slight Odor 198.0 24 18 6-8 i 10 IS-5 I 24 12 8-10 Same as above, with Silt Lenses, Silght Odor 507.0 115 S-6 Same as above, odor in lenses * 351.0 24 24 10-12 eoe 12.0 20 I I ' 25 END OF EXPLORATION 30 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M IA R K IC >tratitication lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under Iconditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time: measurements were made. BL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-17 — Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Arch ite, 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 17 Environmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 031-821 355 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: Ph. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data Boring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization Foreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time BL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" Date Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Wei@ 130 pounds G.S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 $III'.fE Ilat' 0' a SPT �IUw Iefsih Counts Blows/G Sample DescnpfIon. & Cfass><f> carton A. z w odifletl Burm st> r Sfratuna Descrt tton PAD, Ren<arlcs S-1 24 11 0-2 Brown Silty Clay w/fine sand No sample collected Same as above 6.4 S-2 24 8 2-4 i 5 S-3 1 24 1 3 1 4-6 1 1 Same as above j S-4 1 24 18 1 6-8 Brown Silty claw w/ F-C gravel & little F-C Sand 10 (No Odor) S-5 24 12 8-10 12" same as above 10" fine sand and silt wet EOE 10.0 No sample analyzed 1 20 1 25 30 END OF EXPLORATION 9.8 7.9 8.1 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R u S Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. V PL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-18 Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 18 (Architecture nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 55 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data oring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization oreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time IBL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds S. Elevatioi Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 amp--1;e Data: y i+, .. �...> th T: to Gaunis (Eioivs!G :':. ainple'Desctapf an.. CIA, .: v (feet meiies) ..S.S...ficatton (11 ddkiied $urm>ster Sfratum Ilestxi .i PAD Reniarks: S-1 24 11 0-2 Brown Silty Clay Not sampled rS2 Same as above 7.1 24 8 2-4 Brown Silty Clay Same as above w/ fine gravel/ trace (odor) (No Odor) 18" same as above 6" F-M sand & silt odor I 15 EOE 10.0 120 25 30 R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A R K S END OF EXPLORATION 12.8 586.0 1916.0 Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. PL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-19 Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 19 (Architecture nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Su South Burlington Project Number: 031-821 55 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data oring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization ore man Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time IBL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 .. Sa.. ae I3atai .....: ... ...... . . I u. C C �... .... 1. o +; �, v I ►e th Gaunt fl;i¢wslG Sample & 040ific Cton p a .: (feet niches) (luodtfzed Burmister StratumDescri fion, PAD Rernat ks S-1 24 11 0-2 Brown F-M sand, silt, & clay Not sampled Brown clayey silt Fine sand 7.2 I S-2 24 8 2-4 rown clayey silt Same as above Brown F-M Silty Sand F-M sand little (wet) silt no oder EOE 12.0 I' 20 I 1 25 JD END OF EXPLORATION 9.5 10.8 10.1 IR E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M A I R K S ,Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under onditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. PL COMPANIES BORING LOG Boring Number: SB-20 Architecture Engineering Planning Landscape Archite 1805 Shelburne Road (RTE 7) Page: 20 -nvironmental Sciences Analytical Services Land Sury South Burlington Project Number: 03L821 55 Research Parkway, Meriden, Connecticut 06450 Chittenden County, Vermont Checked By: h. (800) 301-3077 Fax (203) 630-2615 Groundwater Data oring Co. Green Mountain Boring Casing Depth Casing Stabilization oreman Mike McGinley Type Split Spoon Date Time to water Depth Time 'BL Rep. Bill Zimmerman Diameter 2" ate Start 08/08/03 Date End 08/07/03 Hammer Weig 130 pounds S. Elevatiot Datum Hammer Fall 30 inches Other Mobile B-50 :..: .. . v a v o a : d y ° ]}eptla $(?TItlw. Godnt� (B.ioivs/� ample D.escrtptiun & C..... . Meet th sj' :(Modtfied!Burhust& S-1 24 10 0-2 Brown Fine to Coarse Sand Some Silt PS-2 Brown clayey silt trace Fine Gravel, Odor 24 16 1 2-4 mmmmm Sul I S-4 1 24 1 16 1 6-8 1 1 I S-5 1 24 1 18 1 8-10 1 1 15 I S-6 24 24 10-12 20 25 1 30 Same as Above, Odor Brown clayey silt trace Fine Gravel, trace Silt Odor Same as Above Same as Above with fine Sand lense, Strong Odor EOE 12.0 4rd.10escniotiott )[ :Remarks END OF EXPLORATION R E * Sample sent to Endyne Labs M IA R K S Stratification lines represent approximate boundaries between soil types, transitions may be gradual. Water level readings have been made at times and under conditions stated. Fluctuations of groundwater may occur due to other factors than those present at the time measurements were made. I11111/1111 THU 11:11 FAX 111 871 1111 ENDYNE INC END YNE, INC. BL Companies 355 Research Pkwy Meriden, CT 06450 Attn: Bill Zimmerman LABORATORY REPORT 2 002/017 Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 06495 (802) 879-4333 FAX 879-7103 PROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 ORDER 1D: 24353 RECEIVE DATE: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 Enclosed please find the results of the analyses performed for the samples referenced on the attached chain of custody. Different groups of analyses maybe reported under separate cover. All samples were prepared and analyzed by requirements outlined in the referenced methods and within the specified holding times. All instrumentation was calibrated with the appropriate frequency and verified by the requirements outlined in the referenced methods. Blank contamination was not observed at levels affecting the analytical results. Analytical method precision and accuracy was monitored by laboratory control standards which I include matrix spire, duplicate and quality control analyses. These standards were determined to be within established laboratory method acceptance limits, unless otherwise noted. Reviewed by, Harry B. Locker, Ph.D. Laboratory Director enclosures ,ee u� ecco°de 'LAY 1126J Pa80 I of 3 08/28/2003 THU 14:09 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYIVT INC 003/017 l� END YNE, INC. Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive W1111ston, Vermont 05495 802) 879-4333 ILAROPATORY REPORT FAX 879-7103 CLIENT: BL Companies ORDER ID: 24353 PROTECT: 1.805 Shelburne Rd/031,821 ANAL. METHOD: SW 8260 IDATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 SAMPLER: EZ REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 ANALYST: 725 Site: SBl-S4 Site: SB5-S5 Sitc: SB9-S3 Ref. Number: 215331 Ref. Number: 215334 Ref. Number 215337 Date Sampled; 8/7/03 Datc Samplcd: 8/7/03 Date Samplcd; 8/7/03 Time Sampled: NI Time Sampled: NI Timc Sampled: NI Analysis Date: 8/13/03 Analysis Dale: 8/14/03 Analysis Dale: 8/14/03 parawrmr Results ueft dry Parameter Rtud i AU,,.dry Parameter Results ugft d MTBE <70.0 MT13E <30.0 MTBE <330- Benzcnc <35.0 Benzene 371, Benzene 643. Toluene < 35.0 Toluene 76.9 Toluene 393, Ethylbenzene 36.3 Ethylbcnzcno 297- Ethylbcnzcnc 2,920. Xylenca, Total < 70.0 Xylenes, Total 923. Xylcnos, Total 12,200. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 285. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 194. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Beazcue 4,230. 1,2,4 Trimethyl 13c 7me 389. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 714. IA4 Trimethyl Benzene 12,600. Naphthalene <70.0 Naphthalene 104. Naphthalene 1,470. UPS > 10. UIP's > 10. UIP's > 10, Surrogate 1 102.% Surrogate 1 99 % Surrogate 1 101% Pcrql' 80, Percent Solid 94, Percent Solid 75. Site: S54-S4 Site: SB6-S5 Site: SBIo-S3 ReE, Number: 215332 Rrf, Number: 215335 Ref. Number: 215335 Date Sampled: 8/7/03 Date Sautpled: 8/7/03 Datc Samplcd: 8/7/03 Time Sampled: NI Time Sampled: NI Timc Sampled: NI Analysis Date: 8/11/03 .Pirairet- - Analysis Date: 8/14/03 Analysis Date: 8/14/03 pluumqtE5 Results ugU dry Rmits u AS, dry Parameter Resu t$y&kp- d- MTBE < 70,0 MTBE 96.4 MTBE < 50.0 Bm=c 459. Benzene 11120, Benzene 102. Toluene 193. Toluene 53.0 Toluene < 25.0 Elhylbenzene 574, Ethylbcn7,ono 25.5 Ethylbcnzenc 573. Xylenes, Total 1,370, Xylenes, Total 52.4 Xylenes, Total 2,640. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 348. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene < 15.0 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 1,410- 1,2,4 Trimcthyl Bcnzmc %220. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Bcnzmr 31.9 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 4,120. Naphthalcnc 163. Naphthalene <30.0 Naphthalene 367. UIP's > 10, VIP's 4- L'IP's > 10, Surrogate 1 101.% Surrogate 1 101% Surrogatc 1 102.% Percent Solid 68. Percent Solid 90. Percent Solid 79. Site: SB5-S3 Silo: SB7-S3 Site: S811-S8 Ref. Number: 215333 Ref, Number: 215336 Ref. Number: 215339 Datc Samplcd: 8/7/03 Date Sampled: 8/7/03 Date Sampled: 8/7/03 Time Sampled: NI Time Samplcd: NI Time Sampled-. Nl Analysis Date: 8/13/03 Analysis Datc: 8/14/03 Analysis Date: 8/14/03 Parameter - Results_ tp/�u dry Parannctcr Results u kp[ e, dry Parameter Results ua/kgd MTBE < 100. MT13E < 60.0 MTBE 615. Benzene 482. Benzene 2,420. BenzenC 325, Toluene 1,060. Toluene 2,390. Toluene <20.0 Ethylbenzene 3,260. Ethylbenzenc 1,180. Ethylbenzene 23.0 Xylenes, Total 13,900. Xylcncs, Total 5,760. Xylenes, Total < 40.0 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 3,290. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 504. 1,3,5 Trimothyl Benzene <20.0 1,2,4 Trimcthyl Bonzcnc 9,830. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene I1810, 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 33.4 Naphthalene 11060. Naphthalene 345. Naphthalene <40.0 UIP's > 10. UIP's > I0. UIP's 10. Surrogate 1 102% Surrogate 1 98.% SurroRatc 1 Percent Solid 71_ Percent Solid 73. PCf wt Solid m + EIAP i i26J Page 2 of 3 08/28/2003 THU 14:10 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNIE INC 2 004/017 A= - END YNE, INC. CLIENT- BL Companies PROJECT: 1805 Shelburlle Rd/03L821 DATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 Site: SB12-S6 Rcf. Number: 215340 Date Sampled: 8/7/03 Time Sampled: NI Analysis Date: 8/14/03 paramet Rcnulta ua/ , dry MTBE < 300, BCn7=C 475. Toluene 840. Elhylbenzene 2,660. Xylenes, Total 6,710. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Serene 3,010. 1,2,4 Trimetlwl Benzene 7,72D_ Naphthalene 709, UWE > 10. Surmgatc ► 102.% Site: SB13•S4 Ref. Number: 215341 bate Sampled: 8/8103 Time Sampled: NI Analysis Date: 8/14/03 papingg RmILS uag`dry MTBE < 160. Bcn7xac 400. Tolucno < 80.0 Ethylbeazene 1,940. Xylenes, Total 827. 1,3,5 Trimethyl Benzene 4,250. I,2,4 Ttimethyl Bmzcnc 5,450_ Naphthalene 1,500. UIP's � 10. SL=Late 1 105 % I Site: SB16-S6 Ref. Number 215342 Datc Sampled: 8/8/03 Time Sampled: NI analysis Date: 8/18/03 paramotc Rcaults uag dry MTBE < 140, Benzene 140. Toluene 156. I Ethylbenzene 2,140. Xylenes, Total 5,920. 1,3,5 Trimctbyl Beene 2,860_ 1,2,4 Trimethyl Bcnzcnc 9,060. Naphthalene 1,050. UIP's > 10. Surrogate, 1 109.% Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 802) 879-4333 879-7103 LABORATORY REPORT ORDER ID: 24353 ANAL. METHOD- SW 8260 SAMPLER: BZ ANALYST: 725 Site: SB18-S5 Ref. Number. 215343 Date 5amplcd: 8/8/03 Time Sampled: NI Analysis Dale: 8/18/03 — Parameter $�fttlls_utJke. dry MTBE < 4,000, Benzene < 2,000. Toluene 3,660. Ethylbcnzmc 27,900. Xylenes, Total I H0,000. 1,3,5TrimcthylBen=c 36,800. 1,2,4 Trimcthyl Benzene 117,000. Naphthalene 14,800. UIP's > 10. Surrogate I 109,% Site: SB20-S5 Rd, Number: 215344 Date Sampled: 8/8/03 Time Sampled: Nl Analysis Date: 8/18/03 Parameter Results pgap. dry MTBE < 3,720. Benzene 5,430. Toluene 48,200. Ethylhcnzone 28,000. Xylenes, Total 148,000. 1,3,5 Trimcthyl Benzene 25,100. 1,2,4 Trimethyl Benzene 82,000. Naphthalene 11,700. UIP's > 10. Surrogate 1 107 % u ELAP 11263 u Page 3 of 3 t- 0 LO 0 J U z W Z A z w n 0 +-i ti a 0o N O r� 0 x E• n 0 0 N 00 N Go O ' 160 .lames Brown Drive Willislon, Vennont 05495 Fk (802) 879-4333 Special Reporting Instructions: Project Name: 1 S $ e J bi1.(he 0�3 L Reporting Address: Billing Address: vesealc 1 met Ikf\ o Endyne Order ID: (Lab Use Only) O9 �J �� t -a Company: pgri t Contact Nam hon �1/�'�'ZIm rfft- is c7� - &M °-3 d 1- 34 � Sampler Name: a' }� Z 1� Phone #: 'za3 — t�.� a y► y -I t �E� 1/ R•t I i DERFZ I m� �! . ..I _ ■MEEK - NEE Relinquished by: Datclrime IR New York State Proiect; Yes No )� l Analyses v -Flg r© i PH 6 TKN 11 Total Solids 15 1 Sulfate 21 1664 TPH/FOG 26 8270 PAH 2 Chloride 7 Total P 12 TSS 17 Colitcrm (Specify) 011MO GRO 27 PP13 Metals 3 Aatmonin N $ Total Diss. P 13 TD5 18 COD 23 8D15 DRO 28 RCRAS Metals 4 NitriLeN 9 BOD 14 Tuflbidity 19 80218 2 826018260B 5 Nitrate N 10 Alkalinity 15 Conductivity 20 801018020 2 9270 WN or, Acid 30 31 Metals (As Is, Total, iss.) Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu. Fe, Hg, K. Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni Pb b, Se, TI, V, Zn 32 TCLP (Specify: volatiles, semi-volatiles, metals, pesticides, herbicides) 33 34 Other (White, Yellow, Pink Copy - Laboratory / Goldenrod Copy - Ctient) IAB 176E CWN �livery� Carnowat O 0 U z w z W n 0 a t- co N 0 Go P4 w 0 0 0 N co N Go `—� 160 James Brown Drive �y '�--V "' Q U U'f O Wit{islon, Vermon105495 A 54 5'Jla C 06, D 82' D +r��} lJr (802) 879-4333 Special Reporting lnslructions: Project Name: S Q S7 0 3 � -g Z) Reporting Address: Billing Address: the( { aer, 0,-r 3.SS tester)) Pk-Wv o6 two Eadyne Order 1D: (Lab Use Only? t: q35 � o Company: 1, C 0-rv-fao t Csrontact Name/PhAM one #: �99� }� 1 M bl �a Sampler Name: Phone #: S ISM Mmu"" i yt I OU'V■NMAN.'"MOMHO EMS� _ _ ONIMERAMIM . _ . ■■■■ IMIRIONO ■■fii�� ■■■■■= MINI MEN ON Relinquished by: DatelTinx VJAJ Received by: UWzffJrne .red Datefirne New York State Project: Yes No Requested Analyses uetu'Eaa<>' Delivery: I. pH 6 TKN 11 ToialSolids 16 Sulfate 21 1664TPFI/FOG 26 82 TM P: 70PAH 2 Chloride 7 Total P 12 TSS 17 Coliform (Specify) 22 8015 GRO 27 PP 13 Metals (White, Yellow, Pink Copy -Laboratory !Goldenrod Copy - Client) 08/28/2003 THU 14:11 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC 2 007/017 Aall END ME,,Nc. LABORATORY REPORT Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 FAX 879-7103 BL Companies PROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 355 Research Pkwy ORDER ID: 24353 Meriden, CT 06450 RECEIVE DATE: August 8, 2003 Attn: Bill Zimmerman REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 Enclosed please find the results of the analyses performed for the samples referenced on the attached chain of custody. Different groups of analyses may be reported under separate cover, All samples were prepared and analyzed by requirements outlined in the referenced methods and within the specified holding times. All instrumentation was calibrated with the appropriate frequency and verified by the requirements outlined in the referenced methods. Blank contamination was not observed at levels affecting the analytical results. Analytical method precision and accuracy was monitored by laboratory control standards which include matrix spike, duplicate and quality control analyses. These standards were determined to be within established laboratory method acceptance limits, unless otherwise noted. Reviewed by, Z2�?07� Harry B. Locker, Ph.D. Laboratory Director enclosures G EVAF 11263 x Page i of a 11/1111111 THU 11:11 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC U 008/017 -END L./ YNE, INC. Laboratory Services ` 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 LABORATORY REPORT FAX 879-7103 CLIENT: BL Compauies ORDER ID: 24353 LPROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 DATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 SAMPLER: BZ ANALYST: 725 Ref. Number: 215331 Site: SB 1-S4 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: N1 Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date ]-Pik 8015 GRO 48.8 mg/Kg SW 8015B 8/13/03 Ref. Number: 215332 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: NI Site: SB4-S4 Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date TPH 8015 GRO 17.1 mg/KS SW 8015B 8/13/03 Ref. Number: 215333 Site: SB5-S3 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date TPH 8015 GRO 131. mg/Kg SW 8015E 8/13/03 Ref. Number: 215334 Site: SB5-S5 Date Sampled, August 7, 2003 Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date TPH 8015 GRO 12.0 mg/Kg SW 8015B 8/14/03 Ref. Number: 215335 Time: NI Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Site: SB6-SS Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date TPH 8015 GRO 2.15 mg/Kg SW 8015E 8/14/03 Ref Number: 215336 Site: SB7-S3 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 — Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Anal is Date TPH 8015 GRO 21.3 mg/Kg SW 8015B ; y CLAP 112ri3 Pap 2 of 4 08/28/2003 THU 14:11 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC U 009/017 --- E V D I! V E, INC. Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 LABORATORY REPORT M 879-7103 CLIENT: BL Companies ORDER ID: 24353 PROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 DATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE;August 21, 2003 SAMPLER: BZ ANALYST: 725 Ref. Number: 215337 Parameter TPH 80 IS GRO Ref. Number: 215338 Parameter TPH 8015 GRO R.ef. Number: 215339 Paratneter TPH 8015 ORO Ref. Number: 215340 Parameter TPH 8015 GRO Ref Number: 215341 Parameter TPH 8015 GRO Ref. Number: 215342 Parameter TPH 8015 GRO Pngc 3 of 4 r_ Site: SB9-S3 Result 157. Site' SB 10-S3 Result 38.1 Site: SB11-S8 Result 2.62 Site: S1312-S6 Result 13 6- Site: SB 13-S4 Result 164. Site: SB16-S6 Result 68.5 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: Ni Unit Method Analysis Date mg/Kg SW 8015E 8/14/03 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: NI J Unit Method Analysis Date mg/Kg SW 8015B 8/14/03 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time. NI Unit mg/Kg Method SW 8015B Analysis Date 8/14/03 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 - Time: NI Unit Method Analysis Date mg/Kg SW 8015B 8/14/03 Date Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: Nl Unit mg/KS Method SW 8015B Analysis Date .8/14/03 Date Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: NI Unit Method Analysis Date ;0P 9Q1 mg/Kg SW 8015E 8 rd E LAP 17?63 . 08/28/2003 THU 14:11 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC Z 010/017 L �/ C END T NC , INC. Laboratory Services ` 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 LABORATORY REPORT FAX 879-7103 CLIENT: BL Companies ORDER ID: 24353 ` PROJECT: 1805 Shelbume Rd/031,821 DATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 I REPORT DATE: August 21, 2003 SAMPLER: BZ IANALYST: 725 I Ref. Number: 215343 Site: SB18-S5 ` parameter Result Unit ITPH 8015 GRO 1,630. mg/Kg IRef. Number: 215344 i Site: SB20-S5 - - parameter Result Unit ITPH 8015 GRO 629. mg/Kg I Pacc 4 ot'4 I Date Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: NI Method Analysis Date SW 8015B 8/18/03 Datc Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: NI Method Analysis Date SW 8015E 8/18/03 hp0 �p •Cr, �SCI� �4 2 ELAP ;7263 r- 0 0 L c� z w z D+ w CD 0 t- OD CV O w -r F C' 0 0 w co N Go O 160 James Brovrn Drive Williston, Vermont 05495�� (802)8794333 Special Reporting Instructions: O O 1 G1 Reporting Address: Billing Address: ut-+Eecuc� the ()kA a -1 Company; pgri l Contact Nam ho A f 1 P1 'Z1M*erM�1 1�-fit�0 �3a1-3a7 Sampler Name: U7 P Z 11X Wf�,�f Phone #: � 1 I -S L�nsmns �■n , CIS i-,r ow Ll +!+ :S 3.4 ta��En . !�! .� � MIS I N 6 ♦i 10100111 SEEM ®1010 OMENS ' EMEM tMEM - f: % 1, XMIONU U I MW MAE Retmquished by: New York State Date/f ime 027t's I/o F L; Yes No Analyses ,Wf6�° H 1 PH 6 1 TKN II Total Solids 16 Sulfate 21 1664TPHNOG 26 a270PAN 2 Chloride 7 Total P 12 TSS 17 Cotifmrn (Specify) 1 9015 GRO 27 PP 13 Metals 3 Ammonia N 8 Total Disc. P 13 TDS 18 COD 23 9015 DRO 28 RCRA8 Metals 4 Nitrite N 9 BOD 14 Turbidity 19 8021B 2 826018260B 5 Nitrate N lO Alk dinity t 5 Conductivity 20 8D10M020 25 8270 WN or Acid 30 31 Metals (As Is, Toial, Iss.) Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni Pb b, Se, TI, V, Zn 32 Tc1.P (Specify: volatiles, semi- volatil es, metals, pesticides, herbicides) 33 34 Other (White, Yellow, Pink Copy - Laboratory I Goldenrod Copy - Client) LM USE ONLY , p Delivery Q /�7% Temp: 1 Ct d Comment ME v t 60 James Brown Drive `%—p ? O `� `� +Q U V f v WIIlistor., Vermont 05495 , �, p es s a C S-70.. 6 $2_ 39IS (802) 879-4333 Special Reporting Instructions: Project Name: i}llt° 4 3 2 Reporting Address: B i l ling Address: eu 1 aen P; r 3.s oLe.s 06 LWO Endyne Order ID: (Lab Use Only) C�11 �'^ o� CQ -C Company: L C fl �i7, v �Uti+1 CSrontact N elPhone Z g�-INti�Q N�V 3Q�% Sampler Name: ti jt tR►M2 Pfiaoe r i.,5" t3 s 0 , I q d 1 _5 No ON __MINE SIM111M - (White, Yellow, Pink Copy - Laboratory t Goldenrod Copy - Client) 08/28/2003 THU 14:12 FAX 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC Z 013/017 Azzi -.-END YNE, INC. BL Companies 355 Research Pkwy Meriden, CT 06450 Attn: Bill Zimmerman LABORATORY REPORT Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 FAX 879-7103 PROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 ORDER 1D: 24353 RECEIVE DAxE: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE: August 22, 2003 Enclosed please find the results of the analyses performed for the samples referenced on the attached chain of custody. Different groups of analyses may be reported under separate cover. All samples were prepared and analyzed by requirements outlined in the referenced methods and within the specified holding times. All instrumentation was calibrated with the appropriate frequency and verified by the requirements outlined in the referenced methods. Blank contamination was not observed at levels affecting the analytical results. Analytical method precision and accuracy was monitored by laboratory control standards which include matrix spike, duplicate and quality control analyses. These standards were determined to be within established laboratory method acceptance limits, unless otherwise noted. Reviewed by, Harry B. Locker, Ph.D. Laboratory Director enclosures FI AP 1196..9 x Pagel of 2 08/28/2003 THU 14:13 F.k3 802 879 7103 ENDYNE INC Ai:j -..,.-..-END YNE, INC. Z 014/017 Laboratory Services 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4333 LABORATORY REPORT AX 879-7103 CLIENT: BL Companies ORDER ID: 24353 PROJECT: 1805 Shelburne Rd/03L821 DATE RECEIVED: August 8, 2003 REPORT DATE: August 22, 2003 SAMPLER: BZ Ref. Number: 215331 Site: SB 1-S4 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: NI 1 Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date Analyst Total Lead 15.5 mg/Kg, dry SM 3113B 8/14/03 410 Ref Number: 215336 Site: SB7-S3 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Timc_ NI Parameter Rcsult Unit Method Analysis Date Analyst. Total Lead 15.0 mg/Kg, dry SM 3113B 8/14/03 410 Ref. Number: 215337 Site: SB9-S3 Date Sampled: August 7, 2003 Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date Analyst Total Lead 16.5 mg/Kg, dry SM 3113B 8/19/03 410 Ref. Number: 215343 Site: SB 18-S5 Date Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date Analyst Total Lead 8.54 mg/Kg, dry SM 3113B 8/19/03 410 Ref. Number: 215344 I Site: SB20-S5 Date Sampled: August 8, 2003 Time: NI Parameter Result Unit Method Analysis Date Analyst Total Lead 21.3 mg/Kg, dry SM 3113B 8/14/03 410 �c av � v u ELAP i12eo Page 2 of 2 C.i z z 7 W ern 0 t� 0 t— Go w 0 >C CID w n 0 0 N C4 0 f 160 James Brown Drive Williston, Vermont 05M n AAA to P_ 0 a ,!2 , e-'— (8U2}8(9-433;i SpecialKeportingInstructions: J AFF` •e.s'W94 .tV '> Pvv4 a I,v Project Name: " o 001K (K a (D 3 �, S 21 Reporting Address: Billing Address: F" 7 (hec )Jz%\ D S Eadyne Order ID: q Use Only) Q J -0 Company: pq,� t Contact Name ha #!: s�"1 k� ZiMWCAM'�35,-f SA" Yd M-�-3a)-3 -7 Sampler Name:(Lab Phone 'i-5 —6 0-J �d 1 -I -S muum� ■ ■� _ i �t !!�a �`i �+ / r �� IS u 7 tr r _ �MINION r �ONE L/ t "' m , L EMNON . �, MEMO --mom-0. Relinquished by: DatcMtoe Received by: (� (agile eceitied by: New York State Project: Yes No R uested Analyses 1 pH 6 TKN 1 I Total Solids 16 Sulfate 21 16CA TP - "G 26 8270 PAH 2 aloride 7 Total P 12 TSS 17 Coliform (Specify) 8015 GRO 27 PP13 Metals 3 Ammonia N 8 Total Diss. P 13 TDS 18 COD 23 8015 DRO 28 RCRAB Metals 4 Nitrite N 9 HOD 14 Ttutidiry 19 80218 1 2 1826M260B m7 5 NimteN 10 Alkalinity 15 Conductivity 20 SONV8020 25 8270BINorAcid 30 11 31 Metals (As Is, Total, iss.) Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nl Pb Sb, Se, TI, V, Zn , 32 1 TCLP (Specify: volatiles, semi-volatiles, metals, pesticides, herbicides) 33 34 Other (While, Yellow, Pink Copy - Laboratory f Goldenrod Copy - Cliem) LM USE ONLY Delivery Commit: t- 0 0 J ~—' 160 James grown Drive Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 879-4,933 Special Reporting Instructions: R>! $Les Project Name: s "Ile. Q 3 z t Reporting Address: Billing Address: ilk et I den 3SS V-es c"dl pkw o 6 LICO Endyne Order Ill: (Lab Use Only} c�c C� -U Company: L C f%r Contact N clPhone #: 6 + I I �D 1-7 Sampler Name: fill 2-tjt.rvte Phone #: In— ft�R _s r► MKII00 0 NONE RIESVIM� _ MIAMriiEMIN IMINIM + Mn'L "M M�MMAIN ME IIIMMMI MEN 1110 MAIN ON IIIMMMI MAIN ME NINE! SOM - Relinquished by: DaWfimee % Received by: lVaterrime ved b : Dater me New York State Project: Yes No Requested Analyses LAB lSEMY Delivery_ 1 pH 6 TKN 11 Total Solids 16 Sulfate 21 166 Temp: Comment 4 TPH/FOl3 2b 8270 PAH 2 Chloride '] TotalP 12 TSS I? Cotiforrn(Specify) 22 BDISORO 27 PPLJ?vtetals 3 Ammonia 11 $ Total Diss-P i3 TD$ 19 COD. 23 8015 DRO 28 RCRAS Metals 4 Nitrite IN 9 BOD 14 Turbidity 19 802IB 24 82bQl82fvDB 29 $ Nitrate N l6 Allcatinity l5 Conductivity 20 8010/8020 25 8270 BN or Acid 3(1 31 Metals {As Is, atal, iss.) Ag, Al, As, 13, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, fVl, 1'b, b, Se, TI, V, Zn 32 TCLP (Specify: ~aolaLiles, semi-volatiles, metals, pesticides, herbicides) 33 34 Othcr (White, Yellow, Pink Copy -Laboratory ! Goldenrod Copy - Client) , + ' Lot.� �F of. 1.9 STATE OF VERM_ONT �? R• °vQ DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RE: Fassett's Bakery, Inc. Application #4CO339-3 1805 Shelburne Road Findings of Fact and South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Conclusions of Law 10 V.S.A., Chapter 151 (Act 250) I. INTRODUCTION On October 5, 1984, an application for an Act 250 permit amendment was filed by Fassett's Baker , Inc. of 1805 Shelburne Road, South Burl ingto , ermon , for generally described as a three lot subdivision and the construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial building with three retail spaces on Lot #3 with related site improvements and to be served by municipal water and sewer and located off of Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The tract of land consists of 16.86 acres with 4.35 acres involved in the project area. This 16.86 acre lot will be subdivided into a 13.68 acre lot with the existing Fassett's Bakery building to be retained by the applicant and three new lots which will be owned by the applicant. Lots #1 and #2 will be leased by the applicant. Under Act 250, projects are reviewed based on the 10 criteria of 10 V.S.A., Sec. 6086 (a) 1-10. Before granting a permit, the Board or District Commission must find that the project complies with these criteria and is not detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Decisions must be stated in the form of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The facts we have relied upon are contained in the documents on file identified as Exhibits #1 through #18, and the evidence received at a hearing held on November 20, 1984. The applicant requested that, as provided for in Rule 21, the Commission issue partial findings. The applicant cannot meet its burden of proof under subcriterion 1(B) because the Bartlett's Bay municipal treatment does not now have available allocation. The plant is expected to have capacity within the upcoming year. Partial findings are necessary for the applicant to obtain financing. Because there were no parties opposing this application the Commission granted this request. Parties to this application who attended the hearing are: The Applicant by Peter Bouyea and Roger Dickenson. e #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 2 II. FINDINGS OF FACT In making the following findings, we have summarized the statutory language of the 10 Criteria of 10 V.S.A., Sec. 6086 (a) . SECTION 6086(a) (1) WATER AND AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that this project will not result in undue air or water pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the findings noted under the subsections of this criterion. ISECTION 6086(a) (1) AIR POLLUTION: The Commission finds that this project will not result in undue air pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 1. There will be no process emissions, noxious odors or noise pollution from this project (Exhibit #7). 2. The commercial building on Lot #3 will be heated with a gas - fired heating system, which will not cause undue air pollution (Exhibit #7). 3. During construction dust will be controlled through applications of calcium chloride (testimony of applicant). 4. 75 parking spaces have been installed on the site of the existing Fassett's Bakery site and 39 parking spaces will be installed on Lot #3 (Exhibit #7) which will not result in undue non -point source pollution. 5. The Commission will require that, prior to instituting any use other than the existing bakery on the retained lot and commercial use on Lot #3 the applicant and any lessee and/or purchaser, receive approval from the Commission. 6. The Commission will require that, prior to the development of Lots #1 and #2, the applicant and any lessee file an amendment application as co -applicants for review with regard to air pollution. (SECTION 6086-(a) (1) (A) HEADWATERS: The Commission finds that this project is not in a headwaters area as defined by this section because the project site is located in an urban area (Exhibit #7). #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 3 SECTION 6086(a) (1) (B) WASTE DISPOSAL: The Commission cannot find that this project will meet applicable Division of Protection Regulations and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful or toxic substances into groundwater or wells. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 7. The sanitary wastes from the existing Fassett's Bakery are being treated at the Bartlett's Bay treatment plant. The estimated 1,500 gallons per day of sanitary wastes, which will be generated by these three new lots, will be disposed of through connection to the Bartlett's Bay municipal treatment plant and the South Burlington Planning Commission has allocated future capacity to service this project. Capacity is not available at this time and the Agency of Environmental Conservation cannot issue a Certification of Compliance until. capacity is available. Additional capacity will be available within the year (testimony of applicant). The Commission will withhold the issuance of a permit until evidence is filed verifying that capacity is available and until a Certification of Compliance has been issued. The Commission will approve a maximum allocation of 1,500 gallons per day of wastewater for these three lots and will require that, prior to the development of Lots #1 and #2, the applicant and any lessee file an amendment application as co -applicants for review with regard to the disposal of sanitary wastes. Additionally, prior to the occupancy of the two retail spaces within the building on Lot #3, the applicant must verify that the total wastewater generated will not exceed the maximum approved. 8. The site is sloping. Stormwater runoff will be sheet runoff over grassed areas prior to discharge into the stream. A Temporary Pollution Permit will be issued, which the Commission will accept as evidence that the project complies with applicable Water Resources Department Regulations (Exhibit #1 and testimony of applicant). The Commission will require that, prior to the development of Lots #1 and #2, the applicant and any lessee file an amendment application as co -applicants for review with regard to stormwater. SECTION 6086(a) (1) (C) WATER CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that this project utilizes the best available technology for water conservation in commercial buildings. The finding depends on and is supported by the following: #4CO399-3 Findings of Fact Page 4 9. Water conserving plumbing fixtures including low -flush toilets and aerated faucets have been specified for this building and the applicant has agreed to require the maintenance of these fixtures in all leases for retail space in this building. The Commission will require that, prior to the development of Lots #1 and #2, the applicant and any lessee file an amendment application for review with regard to water conservation. SECTION 6086(a) (1) (D) FLOODWAYS The Commission finds that this project will not be located in any floodway or floodway fringe because there are no bodies of water located within the vicinity of the project (Exhibit #7). SECTION 6086(a) (1) (E) STREAMS: The Commission finds that the project has been designed to maintain the natural condition of the stream and will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or adjoining landowners because the applicant has agreed to maintain a 50' buffer between the construction and the centerline of the stream (Exhibit #7). SECTION 6086(a) (1) (F) SHORELINES The Commission finds that this project will not be located on any shoreline (Exhibit #7). SECTION 6086(a) (2&3) WATER AVAILABILITY & IMPACT ON EXISTING SUPPLY: The Commission finds that there is sufficient water available to meet the needs of this project and that this projectwill not place an unreasonable burden on an existing supply. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 10. The three new lots will utilize a total of 1500 gallons per day of water. The Commission accepts the letter from the South Burlington Water Department Superintendent (Exhibit #21) as evidence that there is sufficient water available and that the project will not restrict nor encumber present users. #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 5 SECTION 6086(a) (4) SOIL EROSION & THE CAPACITY OF THE LAND TO HOLD WATER: The Commission finds that it must require additional measures regarding soil erosion by condition to insure that undue erosion should not result from the planned construction on Lot #3. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 11. The project site slopes down toward a year round stream. During construction the applicants will install a haybale barrier around the north and east perimeter of the construction area (Exhibit #11A). 12. Stormwater from the parking lot will run overland and downslope to the stream. The Resource Conservationist has recommended that the stormwater runoff from the parking areas be collected in one area, such as the bicycle parking area, and directed into the stream bed through a catch basin or armored channel. Additionally, the Resource Conservation- ist has recommended the planting of Crown Vetch to. provide a stabilized buffer area (Exhibits V, 11A and #22). 13. The Resource Conservationist has recommended that the drainageway or stream be armored with an appropriate size stone to keep this channel defined and stabilized. The discharge into this stream should increase as properties in the upper reaches of the watershed are developed (Exhibit #22) . 14. Given the conflicting opinions of the applicant and the Resource Conservationist, as well as the City requirement that a storm drain be provided along the westerly property line, the Commission cannot determine if the proposed overland stormwater runoff would result in erosion of the bank. Therefore, the Commission will require that the applicant seek the advice of the Agency of Environmental Conservation regarding this question. The Commission will condition the permit to require the planting of crown vetch on any disturbed or unstable northerly portions of the site. 15. The Commission shares the concern of the Resource Conservationist regarding future discharges into this stream, especially in regard to future erosion problems. The applicant has expressed concern for the sharing of the cost of placement of rip -rap material in the stream: It is the Commission's understanding that this stream channel is stable today. The Commission does have jurisdiction over #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 6 this property and, therefore, this section of the stream and, if erosion problems occur, can require that the applicant install stabilization measures. Therefore, the Commission encourages the applicant to work with the City and Soil Conservation Service to prevent future stream channel problems. 16. The Commission will require that, prior to the development of Lots #1 and #2, the applicant and lessee file an amendment as co -applicants for review with regard to soil erosion. SECTION 6086(a) (5) TRANSPORTATION The Commission finds that this project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 17. The applicant estimates that Lot #3 will generate 250 to 300 trips per day and that Lots #1 and #2 will generate 200 to 250 trips per day, or a maximum total of 700 trips per day from the three lots or 90 peak hour trips (testimony of applicant). 18. Lot #1 will be served by the existing driveway to Fassett's Bakery from Shelburne Road, Lots #2 and #3 are to be served by a new driveway onto Shelburne Road. The South Burlington Planning Commission has approved the project with this curb cut. Additionally, the Vermont Agency of Transportation has reviewed the new driveway access, has found that it meets agency standards, and will issue a permit. The Agency notes that the cost of traffic improvements found to be necessary in the future will be the responsibility of the owner (Exhibits #10 and #18). SECTION 6086 (a) (6 & 7) EDUCATIONAL & MUNICIPAL SERVICES: The Commission finds that this project will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide educational, municipal or governmental services. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 19.The Commission finds that impact on educational services does not apply to this project because this project does not involve housing units. 20. The South Burlington Fire Chief and Police Chief have stated that the services of their departments can be provided to this project (Exhibits #23 and #24). #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 7 21. The City of South Burlington has required that the applicant post bonds for the construction of the sidewalk and for the landscaping (Exhibit #25). SECTION 6086(a) (8) AESTHETICS, SCENIC BEAUTY, HISTORIC SITES & NATURAL AREAS: The Commission finds that the project will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites, or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 22. Historic sites, necessary wildlife habitat and rare and irreplaceable natural areas will not be affected by this project (Exhibit #7). 23. The project site in the area of proposed construction is an existing meadow. Existing vegetation on the northerly section of the property will not be disturbed. The project will be landscaped as outlined on Exhibit #16. The applicant agreed to continually maintain the landscaping as approved. Pear trees will be planted along Shelburne Road, between the sidewalk and the parking lot. Several pines will be planted at the rear of the lot and several little leaf linden along the southerly building facade. 24. Exterior 1 ighting wi 11 consist of two, 10' high, downshielded fixtures and building mounted fixtures and will be installed as depicted on Exhibit #19. All fixtures will have concealed light sources (testimony of applicant). 25. The exterior of the building will be constructed as depicted on Exhibit #12 and will be of a light gray color. 26. All utilities will be located underground (testimony of applicant). 27. The applicant has not designed a sign and the Commission will require that the sign be approved prior to installation. SECTION6086(a) (9) CONFORMANCE WITH THE CAPABILITY & DEVELOPMENT PLAN: The Commission finds that this project conforms to the capability and development plan. This finding depends on and is supported by the findings noted under the subsections of this criterion. #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 8 SECTION 6086(a) (9) (A) IMPACT OF GROWTH: The Commission finds that the municipality will be able to accommodate the total growth that will result from this project. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 28. The City of South Burlington has identified no undue burdens on any facilities or services, and the Planning Commission has approved the project. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (B) PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that the soils on this parcel cannot be considered primary agricultural soils because this 16.86 acre parcel is not of a size capable of supporting or contributing to an economic agricultural operation and because the parcel has been developed. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (C) FOREST AND SECONDARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS: The Commission finds that the soils on the site do not qualify as forestry or secondary agricultural soils because this 16.86 developed parcel is not of a size capable of supporting or contributing to an economic forestry or agricultural operation. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (D & E) EARTH RESOURCES & EXTRACTION OF EARTH RESOURCES: The Commission finds that, as no earth resources have been identified on this site this project does not involve the interference with nor extraction of earth resources. (Exhibit #7) . SECTION 6086(a) (9) (F) ENERGY CONSERVATION: The Commission finds that the planning and design of this commercial building reflect the principles of energy conservation and incorporate the best available technology for the efficient use or recovery of energy. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 29. The building will be constructed with an insulation "R" factor of at least R-19 in the walls, at least R-10 in the roof or cap, and at least R-38 in the foundation walls. Additional measures to conserve energy include double -glazed windows and insulated doors (Exhibit #7). I #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 9 SECTION 6086(a) (9) (G) PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES: 31. The Commission finds that this project does not involve private utilities because the applicant will own the lots and the Commission will require that the applicant maintain, repair and replace, as approved, all utilities, to include the driveways and stormwater system. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (H) COSTS OF SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT: 32. The Commission finds that the project is contiguous to existing commercial development. SECTION 6086(a) (9) (J) PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES: The Commission finds utility service is available to this project, that an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services, and that the provision of such services has been planned on the basis of a projection of reasonable population increase and economic growth. This finding depends on and is supported by the following: 33. Vermont Gas Systems and Green Mountain Power Corporation have stated that service is available to this project (Exhibits #26 and #27). SECTION 6086(a) (9) (K) DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING PUBLIC INVESTMENTS: 34. The Commission finds that this project will not unnecessarily endanger the public investment or materially jeopardize or interfere with the function or use of the adjoining road and land owned by the State of Vermont (Exhibit #7). SECTION 6086(a) (9) (L) RURAL GROWTH AREAS: The Commission finds that this project is not located in a rural growth area as defined by the statute. SECTION 6086(a) (10) CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLAN: The Commission finds that 'this project conforms to the local plan as evidenced by the letter from the South Burlington City Planner (Exhibit #28). #4CO339-3 Findings of Fact Page 10 CONSTRUCTION ON COMPLETION & EXPIRATION DATES: The Commission will condition a one year construction completion date upon issuance of the permit. The applicant will lease the two lots for 40 year terms and, therefore, has requested a 40 year permit expiration date which the Commission will grant. III. CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission that the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, will not cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 V.S.A. SEC.6086 (a) with the exception of criteria l(B) and (4). Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this 14th day of December, 1984. 0 G By : �--�,- - e, � . /�lft,, Lincoln C. Brownell, Chairman District #4 Environmental Commission Other Commissioners participating in this decision: Helen B. Lawrence Katherine M. Vose Environmental Board Coordinator for the District #4 Environmental Commission These Findings of Fact shall remain in effect until November 30, 1985. Prior to the issuance of any permit the applicant must submit the additional evidence described in the Findings of Fact with respect to criteria l(B) and 4. ee EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4CO339-3 E D E E A= APPLICANT X A N N T= TOWN H T T T TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC = Regional Planning Commission B R R AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation I E E T D D N B 0. Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT Document Date 1 10/29/84 1 A application form undated 2 It 11letter - re: project description by R.Dickenson, 3 4 5 6 11 of 7 if it 8 it if 9 if if 10 " 11 " 15 " 161 " Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. 10/9/84 notice - service 10/9/84 notice - Commencement of Construction 10/9/84 list - adjoining landowners undated letter - re: supporting information, by R. Dickenson, Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn 10/25/86 summary - re: criteria undated letter - re: local planning approval and con- ditions, by J. Bechtel, South Burlington City Planner 9/14/84 minutes - South Burlington Planning mtg. 9/11/84 Commission plan - "Site Plan," by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn (1 of 6) 2/84 plan - "Lot 3, Site and Utilities," by Fitzpatric-Llewellyn (2 of 6) 9/84 plan revised plan - "Building Perspective," by Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn (3 of 6) 9/84 plan - "Typical Details, Site Facilities," by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn (4 of 6) 2/84 plan - "Typical Details, Site Facilities," by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn (5 of 6) 2/84 plan - "Typical Details, Erosion Control & Site Facilities," by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn (6 of 6) 2/84 plan - landscaping, "Fassetts Bakery, Inc," by Mt. Philo Meadows (1 of 1) 10/10/84 EXHIBIT LIST FOR APPLICATION #4CO339-3 Page 2 Page 2 E APPLICANT A= E D E X A N N T= TOWN H T T T TPC = TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION I E E E RPC = Regional Planning Commission B R R I AEC = Agency of Environmental Conservation I E E S = State T D D N B O Y NATURE OF EXHIBIT Document Date 17111/20/84 1 S Iletter - re: historic sites, by E. Gilbertson, 18 " 19 20 " 21 " 22 " 23 If 24 it 25 It 26 of 27 It 28 if S A Agency of Development and Community Affairs 11/13/84 letter - re: traffic access, by J. Hoag, Vermont Agency of Transportation 4/20/84 diagram and lighting fixture and specifications undated letter - re: future sewer capacity, by W. Szymanski, South Burlington City Manager 11/6/84 letter - re: water service, by R. Perkins, South Burlington Water Department Superintendent 11/19/84 letter - re: soil erosion, by M. Forrest, Soil Conservation Service 11/20/84 letter - re: fire service, by R. Carter, South Burlington Police Chief 11/7/84 letter - re: police service, by J. Goddette, South Burlington Fire Chief 11/20/84 letter - re: Planning Commission, by J.-Bechtel, South Burlington City Planner w/attach 10/26/84 letter - re: gas service, by M. Poirier, Vermont Gas Systems 11/20/84 letter - re: electric service, letter by W. Hipp_, Green Mountain Power Corporation 11/9/84 letter - re: conformance to local plan, letter by J. Bechtel, South Burlington City Planner 11/19/84 10 (kc1c 1t(.�,i�aveci __ _1_.L_-a___._ 13y ::�._". � 1hit Application Completed and Received DY .__ _._ __. _ _- _- UY CITY 01' `;0I11'11 HUWJ1N(710N 1) NAM,, ADDRLSS, AND PHONE NNUMI4 -N OF: (a) Own(�f ()1 ke(_cnd 5. _4 0N_,LI�IIQNE___A%U►2� (fJ) Applica[ 1. (C) C011t.iact: �cJG�.I� �GfGIi01SON �-_1_133.��A�_I�K.` _�wCt:.�.Y�_ _ -�NC • _ �1�05- . -C�,,$tQN 3) PROPOSED USE(..,) : RE 4) SIZE Oh' PRWf.-)CT (i.e., H of units, 1-1(x.)r ar(r c, etc.) 5) NUMBER OF' Fn)LOYEES (full & part mine) 6) COST ESTIM I -I' ; : (a) Buildings 200�000 (b) Landscaping %Q00 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) !) ESTIMATED PROJEC P CCPIPLETION DA`I9 £I) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TIUMI "IC (in & out) 00y P D 9) PEAK HOUR (S) OF OPIMPION _ we-s—a. ws - _ NOOe,J LI wr . .1.0) PE;AK DAYS OF 01T1M'ION lNC)Ne FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services The Kiln 0 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000 October 9, 1984 Ms. Katherine Vose, Coordinator District EnvironmentAl Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: Act 250 Amendment Application Fassett's Bakery, Inc. South Burlington, Vermont 05401 FILE: 8493 Dear Ms. Vose: On behalf of our Client, Fassett's Bakery, Inc., we are submitting the enclosed Act 250 Amendment Application, supporting information and application fee of $145.00. The Scope of this Application is to subdivide three commercial lots fronting along Shelburne Road from the existing parcel and to construct a 5,000 square foot building on Lot #3. The proposed lots will utilize municipal water, sewer, solid waste disposal, fire and police services. Potential impacts of this Project on these services have been assessed at the local level during subdivision review. We are enclosing a copy of a letter from Jane Bechtel, City Planner, dated September 14, 1984, and a copy of the minutes of the Planning Commission's final plat public hearing, dated September 11, 1984. Since receipt of final plat approval, however, the proposed sizes of the lots have been increased and a site plan developed for Lot #3. We have resubmitted the proposed subdivision site plan to the South Burlington Planning Commission and their approval is pending. We would appreciate the Commission's consideration of this application as a minor Act 250 application. Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions or require additional information concerning this application. Sincerely Yours, FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Rogir i Di cki nson, P. E. RJD:amo cc Peter Bouyea Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting APPLICATION FOR LAND USE PERMIT AME11Dh1ENT INSTRUCTIONS: User -this form for all Land Use Permit amendments, including permit transfers. Applications for permit transfers are to be completed by the transferree. SECTION I - Application # 4CO339 Filing Date- Laws Involved: Act Z50 Deemed Complete By: Cost :130,00(# of lots: 3 Fee:$145.00 Deed: Vol.136 Page(s) 313 SECTION II - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 1. APPLICANT: Fassetts Bakery, Inc. 1805 Shelburne Road South Burlington,VT 862-2222 NAME ADDRESS PHONE 2. PROPERTY OWNER: same NAME ADDRESS PHONE 3. PERSON TO BE CONTACTED ABOUT THIS APPLICATION (Complete only if different than #1): Roger J. Dickinson FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incorporated, Essex Junction,VT 4. WHAT IS YOUR LEGAL INTEREST IN THIS PROPERTY? Owner 5. IF YOU ARE NOT FILING THIS APPLICATION AS AN INDIVIDUAL, C MPLETE THE FOLL WIN : Corporation April 1, 1977 April 1, 1977 -CLegal Entity date formed St. Date Reg. in VT 6. WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THIS REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE PERMIT: Subdivide 3 lots fronting along Shelburne Road and construction of a 5,000 square foot commercial building on Lot #3. 7. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FROM INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION a. Acreage in the entire tract of land No change b. Acreage in this project 4.4 acres c. Date the project will be started _ 1985 d. Date the project will be completed 1986 e. Funding or bonding of this project VIDA f. Municipal services to be used Water, sewer, fire police solid waste SECTION III - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PERMIT TRANSFERS 8. TRANSFERREE: I hereby agree to complete this project as set forth in the application, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Land Use Permit # and as amended above: Transferree) 9. TRANSFERROR: _ I hereby agree to the transfer of Land Use Permit # as set forth above: (Transferrot) SECTION IV - NOTICE TO PARTIES - TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL APPLICANTS FOR ACT 250 PROJECTS 10. This application must be signed by the applicant. By signing this application the applicant assumes responsibility. for the information provided and, when the amendment involves Act 250, confirms that the town selectmen, Planning Commission and Regional Planning Commission were given a copy of the application as required. (Signature of A lican . 1 DATE:' •Cre tObp r4-1 `1984 In accordance with Title 10 VSA, 96084, I certify that I have delivered complete.sets'of this application and all plans and attachments to the' municipality (Selectmen, Aldermen, Trustees), the municipal planning commission, the Chittenden County Regional Planning.Comm ission; and any adjacent municipality. and municipal planning commission adjoining this project. FEE: .$145.00 LIST OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS AND ADDRESSES:_. Enclosed LOCATION MAP Ericlosed ' Enclosed COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION NOTICE: N O T I C E C01VE ]CEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT pursuant to Title 10 VSA Section 6081 (Act 250) "Ccarmencement of construction" is defined by Act 250 as "the construction of the first improvement on the land or to any stricture or facility located on the land in- cluding work preparatory to construction such as clear- ing, the staking out or use of a right-of-way or in any way incidental to altering the land according to a plan or intention to improve or to divide land by sale, lease or otherwise transfer an interest in the land." (Envi- romental Board Rule 2(C) A violation of any provision of the rules is punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each day of the violation or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. (T. 10 VSA, Section 6003) . I understand there is to be no site work or construction ccxnnenced on this project until a written Land Use Per- mit is issued. I further understand that verbal indica- tion that a Land Use Permit may be issued does not consti- tute authorization to commence construction. pt&.z SUAY r�s Applicant's SIgnatore Date THIS NOTICE MUST BE EXECUTED AND RETURNED WITH YOUR LAND USE APPLICATION. FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 * (802) 878-3000 LIST OF ABUTTORS TO PROPERTY OF FASSETT'S BAKERY, INC. SHELBURNE ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT'. 1. STATE OF VERMONT, Vermont Railway Incorporated, Lessee 267 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont 05401' 2. STATE OF VERMONT, Agency of Transportation 133 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05602 3. The Automaster 1835 Shelburne Road South Burlington,,Vermont 05401 4. Wickes Lumber 1825 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 5. Albert J. Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 6. Richard and Francis Nesti 1 Nesti Boulevard Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting PLANNER 658-7955 (g RECEIVED � City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 September 14, 1984 Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn The Kiln 15 Brickyard Road Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Roger: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of September 11, 1984. Your Final Plat application was approved with the following stipulations: 1) That the necessary access permits be•secured from the Agency of Transportation. 2) That a sewer allocation of 1500 g.p.d. be provided in conformance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy, and that each lot receive an individual allotment from this amount at site plan review. 3) That any necessary legal documents for utility easements be approved by the City Attorney. 4) that this approval expires in three years. Be sure to file your Allar with the City Clerk within 90 days. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, vck Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg cc: Peter Bouyea, Fassetts Bakery RECEIVEP CEP 1 7 1984 93I oc� PLANNING. COMMISSION September 11, 1984 page 3 Consider site lan a2plication of John Russell for the conversion of a duplex into 1612 sq. ft. of office- space and 906 sq. ft. of —residential space located at 10 Cottage Grove Avenue Ms. Bechtel advised that the applicant had received Zoning Board approval for multiple use: residential and commercial. Phil Wagner advised that traffic will come in from Cottage Grove Avenue into a lot of 7 spaces. The building is a duplex with a 2-car garage. On the east side the building is 2 stories, and on the west it is 1 story. It is the 2-story side that they wish to convert into one dfice for a geologist. Drainage will go to the back yard which is sandy soil. The drive will be sloped so it does not drain onto neighbor's property. Mr. Poger raised the question of meeting requirements if there are 7 parking spaces on the side of the building. Mr. Russell said parking could be put out back as there is plenty of room. Mr. Dooley then moved that the South Burlington Planning Com- mission approve the site plan application of John Russell for e conversion of a duex into 1612 s. of o ice space and 906 sq. of residentiai space located a_ o a e Grove Avenue as depicted on a plan en l e"Rose.i ado Estate, C o Sou ur n on ' a e an rev sed with e followina s pu a ions: 1) That the method of handling parking lot and driveway drainage e submitted to ifF-e C-Tt Engineer for approval and e shown on e plan, prior to permit. 2) That prior to permit, the a�pl_icant shall submit a revised parkinglan consistent with the on n rdinance re uiremen s or a variance thereof and provi7inga 20 ft. aisle, to the My Planner for approval. 3) That this approval expires in 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded with unanimous approval. Public Hearing for Final Plat application di Fassetts Bakery for a 3-lot subdivision of a parcel of land coh'ta-i-nin ___3,Y acres located south of 1693 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Dickinson advised that Plot #1 will be accessed from the existing roadway; plots #2 & #3 will share an access opposite Harbor View Rd. The use will be commercial only and no def- inite plans have yet been made. Mr. Poger noted that the applicant is second on the sewer list and no permit can be issued until capacity is available. Mr. Dickinson added that they propose to install a water main extension to get across Shelburne Road. PLANNING COMMISSION Setpember 11, 1984 page 4 Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission a rove the Final Plat a ication of Fasset s Baker nc. Peter ou ea or a 3-lot subdivision o a arce o an con &inin acres, locatea locatesouth of lb95 Shelburne oa as depicted on �a 4 �a_g_e_ _se o �plans entitled " roper y o Fassetts BakerInc. "-daied Au s 22- 1 as revise prepare Ly- i zpa ric - ewe_yn, Inc., and subject o the following s in- ulations : 1) That the necessary access permits be secured from the Agency of Transportation. 2),That a sewer allocation of 1500 g.p.d. be provided in con- " rmance with e South Burlin on Sewer of c an a eac lot receive an indivMual allotment rom this amount at site plan review. 3 That any necessary legal documents for utilitv easements be approved by the Citv Attornev. 4) That this approval expires in three years. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Consider site 21an application of Rene J. Berard for construction of a 4000 sq. ft. structure including a 2800 sq. ft. construction facility and 1200 sq. t. residence at lot #5, Ethan Allen Drive. Mr. Berard explained that the 2800 sq. ft. space would be for a Berard Construction warehouse, and the 1200 sq. ft. living quarters would be for his son. Ms. Bechtel noted that Zoning Board approval had beenreceived for the multiple use; however, it was stipulated that only an immediate family member could reside in the living space. Mr. Berard said there would be 7 parking spaces, and they were asking for a waiving of the 7 additional required spaces. Nothing now exists on the site. Mr. Berard reported that percolation tests are excellent and have been submitted. He noted that there is no landscaping plan but that will be submitted. Mr. Doolex then moved that the South Burilin ton Planning Commission approve the site plan applicAtion of Rene J. Berard,an Allen Drive for the construction oa 4,000 sq, ft. s rucTure (1200 sq. . of residential space and 2800 sq.-ft. of commercial space), locate on lotan Allen Drive, as depictea on a an entitled "Proposed.Sewage Disposal s em and Site an as re are z arc - ewe n Inc., stamped wi e foiiowing stipulations: 1) That a revised landscaping plan be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. 2) That a $1500 bond for landscaping be posted prior to permit. `►le -as is Uct- #uut )+Nurlin tun Nire i9P artm)nt 575 Barnet Itreet "r *nut4 Nurlingtnn, Vermont 85401 November 20,1984 Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner So. Burlington Planning Commisston 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VErmont 05401 Dear Ms. Bechtel, OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863.6455 Plans Have been reviewed by this department on the 5000 sq . ft. building for construction on lot #3 Fassetts property on Shelburne road. I am pleased to inform you that I do not see a problem with giving the protection required . If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Si cerely ames Woddette Sr. Chief November 19, 1984 Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick --Llewellyn Associates 15 Brickyard Road Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Roger: The South Burlington Planning Commission approved the construction of a 5000 square foot building for retail use on lot #3 of the Fassetts Bakery Subdivision on October 23, 1984. This is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg l_ �3 November 16, 1964 Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates 15 Brickyard Road Essex Junction; Vermont 05452 Dear Roger: Enclosed is the signed Findings of Fact from your recent site plan approval. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl cc: Peter Bouyea October 26, 1984 Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. 15 Brickyard Road Essex junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Royer: Enclosed are the minutes from the Revised Final Plat for Fassetts 3-lot subdivision. Be sure to file your mylar with the Clerk within 90 days and be sure to show the sidewalk on this plan. Also enclosed are the minutes from tkee Site Plan approval for lot #3. I will send you the Findings of FaL_t under separate cover. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcq 1 Encl cc: Peter Bquyea 1 )2/84 JS13 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Fassetts Bakery, for the construction of a 5000 square foot building for retail use on lot #3 of the Fassetts 3- lot subdivision on Shelburne Road, as depicted on a 6 page set of plans entitled, "Property of Fassetts Bakery, Inc., Site Plan", prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc., stamp dated October 16, 1984 with the following stipulations: 1. That a $6000 bond for landscaping be posted prior to permit. 2. That the sewer allocation for this lot is 500 gallons per day, and is placed on the waiting list. That this approval expires in ,0 months. I - '-V" k'tAy' a Memorandum October 23, 1984 Agenda 10/19/84 Page 2 Circulation Parkinq and Access Access is provided through the Service Road and a gate. New pave- ment will be installed up to the runway, north of the trailer. Two parking spaces are provided by the Emery/FEC office building. Landscaping: Plantings or temporary planters should be place around the trailer, at a value of $200. 5) FASSETTS BAKERY, 3 LOT SUBDIVISION, SHELBURNE ROAD The applicant proposes 2 revisions to the Final Plat approved on September 11, 1984. This has been rewarned as a public hearing. 1) The depth of the lots has increased from 200 feet to 270 feet to increase the useable area on each lot particularly lot 3 which is divided by a ravine. 2) Lots 2 and 3 were approved with a shared driveway located di- rectly across from Harbor View Road. Upon further investigation, engineers learned that a utility pole that was to be relocated, serves as a major trunk line and transformer. Relocation costs exceed $20,000. The applicant prefers to move the driveway rather than the pole. Several issues arise: 1) The driveway was to be built directly across from Harbor View Road to reduce the danger of conflicting turns. A high traffic generator on lot 2 or 3 would be a problem and may have at some point require a signal although none is warranted or planned now. We now know that the proposed use of lot #3 is for a thrift store for Fassetts Bakery and two other retail uses (see next agenda item). The fact that this is just a driveway and not a road serving numerous lots makes it less urgent that the driveway align'with Harbor View Road. However, it appears more reasonable to have a shared driveway between lot 2 and 3 on the lot line, rather than offsetting it 13 feet to accommodate the telephone pole. The sewer allocation is still 1500 gpd for the 3 lots, and all approvals are on the waiting list. ASSETTS BAKERY, LOT)#3, SHELBURNE ROAD The applicant proposes to construct a 5000 square foot building for retail use. The tenants will be the Fassetts Thrift Store Memorandum October 23, 10/19/84 Page 3 1984 Agenda and two other retail tenants. Access: A 30 foot shared right-of-way is proposed between lots 2 and 3 with a 24 foot paved driveway to serve this building. Circulation and Parking: Thirty six parking spaces are proposed with 24 foot aisles. Three truck loading/unloading spaces are placed at the rear of the building. Landscaping: Is proposed in the front of the lot on Shelburne Road and around the parking lot and meets the required cost. Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments. 7) GREGORY AND DAUGHTERS, LOT #1, WILLISTON ROAD AND GREGORY DRIVE (BOB PLATT) The applicant proposes to construct a 6400 square foot building, (two floors totaling 12,800 square feet) on lot #1, at the corner of Gregory Drive and Williston Road. This is the first lot to be developed in this industrial subdivision. The Zoning Board approved a multiple use for this building on October 15. Part of the ground floor (4000 square feet) will be occupied by Reprographics of New England for light manufacturing. The balance of the ground floor and the first floor will be divided up by 4 commercial tenants (maximum). The Zoning Board restricted tenants to those uses listed in sections 13.101, 13.102, 13.103, 13.104, 13.105 and 13.109. These are business, professional and medical offices; light manufacturing; research and testing labs; printing, book binding; publishing and engraving; wholesale establishments; and equipment service and repair shops. An add- itional 8000 square feet is planned for a later date and will require site plan review at that time. Circulation and Parking: Circulation is shown on two sides of the building with a 22'-24' wide driveway around the front. Thirty five parking spaces including 1 handicapped space are shown, and are adequate. A truck dock is proposed. Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: A 25 foot wide driveway is shown from Gregory Drive. The curb cut will be 145 feet from Williston Road. Gregory Drive should be built to City standards prior to permit. A deceleration lane must be built on Williston Road and a bond posted in an amount determined by the City Engineer. (see Bill's memo) M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: October 23 Agenda Items Date: 10/18/84 4) FEDERAL EXPRESS No Comments. 5) FASSETTS (3 lot subdivision) 1. A sidewalk should be included across frontage of 3-lots. 6) FASSETTS (lot #3) 1. I recommend an inlet and storm drain pipe along the westerly line to intercept drainage from the three lots and piped to brook. This is to prevent runoff down a steep bank and onto the bakery parking lot. 7) GREGORY AND DAUGHTERS Lot #1 1. The entrance drive shall have uniform radii on both sides of street intersections. 2. The developer of original sub -division shall furnish bond for completion of the street and utilities prior to permit. October 19, 1984 Roger Dickinson Fitzpatrick Llewellyn, Inc. 15 Brickyard Road Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Roger: Enclosed is the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting on October 23. My two memos regarding the Fassetts Bakery Final Plat, and the Site Plan are also enclosed. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encls lo� 18 I ' j a-Od'Ao4 Lk, C Y-013 cy i �t- _ � i- - .3Ry. -LAAMa y. --- ----- -- ----- ---- -- ------ 1 u/ 9/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 8500 square foot fitness center and nursery as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and latest revision dated 9/18/84 with the following stipualtions: 1) A fire alarm system will be installed at the applicant's expense to connect the existing building and the new building to the fire department. 2) A hose station will be installed at a location determined in consulation with the South Burlington Fire Chief. 3) The applicant shall provide verification from an architect or an engineer that the ventilating system is adequatec to remove smoke from the building if required. 4) A landscaping bond in the amount of $5000 shall be posted prior to permit. 5) Credit for existing vegetation is granted at $3000. 6) A sewer allocation of 900 gallons per day for the fitness center be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 7) A drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval prior to permit. 8) Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways at grade of existing drive- way. 9) The height will not exceed 35 feet. 10) This approval expires in 6 months. �- of co — o V<- 4 -CraCvtc- � L Luwz �> ' \O -D (1 y 5 Co Cacaiv 00 Cea , i o V,(nAen a jay, C�a o I b 3 , STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vt. 879-6563 TO: All Parties FROM: Katherine M. Vose, Environmental Board District Coordinator DATE: November 25, 1985 RE: #4C0399--3 Fassett's Bakery, Incorporated South Burlington Please be advised the District #4 Commission has received a re- quest to extend the end of effectiveness date of the Findings of Fact for the above referenced project. The applicant has requested the extension to allow additional time to submit inform- ation required by the Commission before a permit can be issued. The Commission will issue an extension effective until May 30, 1986 unless any party objects on or before Friday, December 6, 1985. At any time during the next six months the Applicant may file the outstanding information. The Commission reserves the right to request that the Applicant address any changes which may have occurred with respect to the issued Findings of Fact prior to issuing a Land Use Permit. If you have any comments or questions please contact me at the Essex Junction office at the above number. KMV/al