HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-92-0000 - Supplemental - 1720 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
;size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the i hbor o
district in rhich e�9property is located;
(2) That because of such physical circu stakes or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore neces�s o enab��AAee the reanable use of the
property: -r,��Oi,M r /.f/7 /Y,f s1' �..5 -
(3) Tpt such unnecessary hardsh1p1has not been �eated by the
a el�ht; _® l .� o i
(4)
(5)
That the variance, if authorized, ill not/4 the
essential character of the neigh orhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
Dronerty- nnr },o
That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of he zoning regulations and of
the plan. /J
Appeal #
Date
Appellant
Vote:
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
,size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of.the zoning regulations in the Re'ighborhood or
district in which the propertyis located; �
�_�----
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unneces
appellant; ��
ip has not been created by the
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, '-7nor be detrim�tal to the
�ublic welfare
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
Appeal #
Date
Appellant
Vote: Yes T_
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
;size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the -
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of_the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
distr' t in hich the property is located;
.4 ,
(2)
That because of such physical circumstances or conditions;
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been nrPAf,_A ►-- a...
(4)
That the variance, if authorized, will not alter t'he
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
n /J
(6) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulatio s and of
the plan. f� l
Appeal #
Date _L(J/
AppellantZ�_1 i
Vote: Yes No Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the
Development Act
Planning &
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property- is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the
property;
t) A ? +6l L(1-1 1-heT M 4 Goy 00w
C
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
6T 4 dj
(4) T it the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan.
�obf) jA6l talk: )L1-(/
Appeal #
Date `� ' )9�
Appellant '
lam- � C7 0L �
Vote: Yes r—� No Sign
Use Reverse side for addition finding-
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
, size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or-ottier,physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of_the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore necessary to enable the reasonable se of t d
property; G -2 -"- Vk., c;(r .,n L:� '-ft�,�7� L . � :y " i"-' . /-/-
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
.
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare;
)%171c]� ! ip f-4 t-C C.:Q (�Q_
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of
the plan. 3 1" 1_-0 J ,ay, � -/"' ' t e ,l ; .y
Appeal *
Date /0 = o@ a fZ--
Appellant ` LL-f 7-1
Vote: Yes No/ SignC�-
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST11IFNT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or
district in which the property is located;
b_
(2) That because of such hysical circumstances o conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
therefore neces ary to enable the reaso ble use of the
property; n$
cq<-;t q_c"" C_W_' Vto- CLi. I cpl"
(3) That such unnecssa hardship has not been c eated y th
appellant;
app�p+ e, l l a n t ; (..3, /'� _ r /� '\L 1 i� `/ r yL
`--/ " `'i!_- _ � cT- ► df.'..JC-.t .— _ i A.-
.- (,-,D ���e.r � /`r. J' nn _._tA i
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in which
the property is located, nor substantially or permanently
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
pro
,,P,7rty hor be detrimental to t o publ cy welfare;
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the
least modifi i-on po 'ble of the zoning regulations nd of
the plan.
I Appeal #
Date 1 b 1,(.CGC
Appellant
.Z
Vote: Yes r—I No � Sign
Use Reverse side for additional findings
SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot
size or shape, or exceptional topogr.ahical or other physical
conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the
unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the
circumstances or conditions generally created by the
provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighbo hoo r
district in which the property is located;
(2) That ecaus-
e of such physical circumsta es or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed
in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning
regulations and that the authorization of a variance is
thereffo eryecessary to enable `e ea o ble use of,, e
propip!
i
(3) That such unn ass r hardship has of been rea e by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorizedit the
essential character of the neighborhood or district in
the property is located, nor substantially or permanen
impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent
property,, nor be cetriment��l to the public welfare;
(5) That th anc`, if u horizedl, wil represent t e mi"`m
variance that wi 1 afford relief and will represent the
least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of J
the plan.
Appeal #.�/
Date
Appellant /
Vote: Yes r--1 No � Sign �J t
Use Reverse side for additional findings