Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-92-0000 - Supplemental - 1720 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot ;size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the i hbor o district in rhich e�9property is located; (2) That because of such physical circu stakes or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore neces�s o enab��AAee the reanable use of the property: -r,��Oi,M r /.f/7 /Y,f s1' �..5 - (3) Tpt such unnecessary hardsh1p1has not been �eated by the a el�ht; _® l .� o i (4) (5) That the variance, if authorized, ill not/4 the essential character of the neigh orhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent Dronerty- nnr },o That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of he zoning regulations and of the plan. /J Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot ,size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of.the zoning regulations in the Re'ighborhood or district in which the propertyis located; � �_�---- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unneces appellant; �� ip has not been created by the (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, '-7nor be detrim�tal to the �ublic welfare (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes T_ Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot ;size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or -other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the - unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of_the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or distr' t in hich the property is located; .4 , (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions; there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been nrPAf,_A ►-- a... (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter t'he essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; n /J (6) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulatio s and of the plan. f� l Appeal # Date _L(J/ AppellantZ�_1 i Vote: Yes No Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Development Act Planning & (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property- is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; t) A ? +6l L(1-1 1-heT M 4 Goy 00w C (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 6T 4 dj (4) T it the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �obf) jA6l talk: )L1-(/ Appeal # Date `� ' )9� Appellant ' lam- � C7 0L � Vote: Yes r—� No Sign Use Reverse side for addition finding- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot , size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or-ottier,physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of_the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable se of t d property; G -2 -"- Vk., c;(r .,n L:� '-ft�,�7� L . � :y " i"-' . /-/- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; . (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; )%171c]� ! ip f-4 t-C C.:Q (�Q_ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 3 1" 1_-0 J ,ay, � -/"' ' t e ,l ; .y Appeal * Date /0 = o@ a fZ-- Appellant ` LL-f 7-1 Vote: Yes No/ SignC�- Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST11IFNT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; b_ (2) That because of such hysical circumstances o conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore neces ary to enable the reaso ble use of the property; n$ cq<-;t q_c"" C_W_' Vto- CLi. I cpl" (3) That such unnecssa hardship has not been c eated y th appellant; app�p+ e, l l a n t ; (..3, /'� _ r /� '\L 1 i� `/ r yL `--/ " `'i!_- _ � cT- ► df.'..JC-.t .— _ i A.- .- (,-,D ���e.r � /`r. J' nn _._tA i (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent pro ,,P,7rty hor be detrimental to t o publ cy welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modifi i-on po 'ble of the zoning regulations nd of the plan. I Appeal # Date 1 b 1,(.CGC Appellant .Z Vote: Yes r—I No � Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topogr.ahical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighbo hoo r district in which the property is located; (2) That ecaus- e of such physical circumsta es or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is thereffo eryecessary to enable `e ea o ble use of,, e propip! i (3) That such unn ass r hardship has of been rea e by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorizedit the essential character of the neighborhood or district in the property is located, nor substantially or permanen impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property,, nor be cetriment��l to the public welfare; (5) That th anc`, if u horizedl, wil represent t e mi"`m variance that wi 1 afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of J the plan. Appeal #.�/ Date Appellant / Vote: Yes r--1 No � Sign �J t Use Reverse side for additional findings