HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1693 Shelburne Road (2)i
`y� SpVSN BU11tIFCTp�, V A~O
f
•, e
~tp� TOWN
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
February 6, 1989
Mr. Peter Tanger
S.B. Tanger & Company, Inc.
885 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Re: Retail Complex, Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Tanger:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the December 13, 1988 Planning Commission meeting
minutes. Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Ms. Genie Soboslai
Mr. Liam Murphy
MIDDLEBURY:
PETER F. LANGROCK
JON C. STAHL (1940-1985)
ELLEN MERCER FALLON
WILLIAM B. MILLER, JR.
JAMES W. SWIFT
EMILY J. JOSELSON
JOHN F. EVERS
SUSAN M. MURRAY
JOHN L. KELLNER
ANNA E. SAXMAN
LANGROCK SPERRY PARKER & WOOL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A PARTNERSHIP
INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
MIDDLEBURY: BURLINGTON:
15 S. PLEASANT STREET
P.O. DRAWER 351
MIDDLEBURY, VERMONT
05753-035 1
802-388-6356
October 28, 1988
HAND DELIVERED
Mr. Joe Weith
City Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Mr. Weith:
275 COLLEGE STREET
P.O. Box 721
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
05402-0721
802-864-0217
BURLINGTON:
MICHAEL W. WOOL
FRED I. PARKER
MARK L. SPERRY
LIAM L. MURPHY
THOMAS Z. CARLSON
ALISON J. BELL
REPLY TO:
BURLINGTON OFFICE
This letter is to follow up our discussion regarding the
traffic overlay provisions of the City of South Burlington
Zoning Ordinance.
As we discussed, I would like to clarify two matters. First,
in regard to a proposed use, can we receive an advance
determination of the category of use under the Traffic
Generation Data and Calculation Procedures (Page 83, Table
III) of the Zoning Regulations?
Second, if the use is categorized as one of those listed in
the above -referenced table, may we rely on the traffic
generation data in such table or must we do an independent
traffic study?
More specifically, my client is interested in purchasing a
parcel of land adjacent to a road which is categorized as
"Zone 5" on the traffic overlay map. My client plans to
develop a 50,000+ square foot Specialty Retail Center
containing shops specializing in quality clothing and hard
goods. In fact, the center would contain stores similar to
the Specialty Retail Center containing outlet stores next to
the Grand Union on Shelburne Road and similar to the
Tennybrook Square on Route 7 in Shelburne, except that the
quality of the merchandise would be higher. We would like a
determination of whether this proposed use would fit within
the category in Table 3 listed as "Specialty Retail Center".
The proposed use currently appears to fit within the
description of a "Specialty Retail Center" in the September
1987 Traffic Generation report by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers.
Mr. Joe Weith
October 28, 1988
Further, we would like to determine that if the proposed use
does fit within the "Specialty Retail Center" category of use
whether we would be able to use the trip generation
determinations in Table III. Further, we would like to
confirm our understand that if the proposed use did qualify
as a "Specialty Retail Center" in Zone 5 that 10,000 G.F.A.
would be permitted for each 40,000 square feet of lot area.
I understand that you will be raising these issues with the
Planning Commission on Tuesday evening, November 1, 1988. If
you wish any additional information or if you would like me
to attend the Commission's meeting, please let me know.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Liam L. Murphy
LLM:TMWC
r,
F
PLANNING COMMISSION 13 DECEMBER 1988
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular
meeting on Tuesday, 13 December 1988, at 7:30 pm, in the
Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street.
Members Present
Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, Mary -Barbara Maher,
Ann Pugh, William Craig
Also Present
Joe Weith, City Planner; Stephen Stitzel, City Attorney; Sid
Poger, The Other Paper; Peter Tanger, Liam Murphy, Nancy
Knox, Larry Bagdan, Kevin McGonagle, Michael Dugan, Alex
Rose, Robert Miller
1. Sketch plan application of S.B. Tanger & Cow �Inc;p�for con-
struction of a 47,000 sq. oreson
a 4.69 acre lot, Shelburne Rd.
Mr. Tanger located the lots south of Shearer Chevrolet. He
said there are 2 curb cuts now which will be consolidated
into one. It would be a specialty retail center of factory
outlet stores exclusively. The maximum 30o coverage would
allow 61,420 sq. ft. It would be zone 5 for traffic. They
propose only 47,000 sq. ft.. They feel a specialty use
retail center is a permitted use for the lots.
Mr. Jacob noted receipt of a letter from Liam Murphy,
attorney for the applicant, regarding whether this should be
pcd or site plan review. Mr. Weith noted that a few weeks
ago the Commission decided such applicants would be handled
as pcd's. Mr. Murphy said they don't dispute this is a sub-
division, but they dispute whether it is a pcd or a permitted
use. Mr. Burgess said the Commission will view it as a pcd
until it hears otherwise from the City Attorney.
The question then arose as to whether the Commission can
waive the frontage standard for a pcd. Mr.!,bith said
according to Sect. 11.507, it can. Mr. Weith noted they
don't meet front yard coverage requirement. Regarding
traffic, he recommended a traffic analysis with impacts on
Allen Rd, Green Mountain Drive/Bartlett Bay Rd., also trip
generations and the possibility of a deceleration lane. Mr.
Burgess said the main criteria will be whether the project
causes undue traffic congestion at nearby intersections.
Mrs. Maher said she would like to know how dangerous turning
movements in and out of the development will be. Mr. Tanger
said they wouldn't be servicing commuter traffic and their
main business times would be Saturdays and weekdays from 2-4
pm and 7-9 pm.
PLANNING COMMISSION
13 DECEMBER 1988
PAGE 2
Mrs. Maher noted the City Engineer's concern with where the
building is placed on the lot because of the looseness of
fill. Mr. Tanger said if it needs to be compacted, they will
do so. Mr. Weith also noted the culvert is very deep and the
proposed building might be in the way. Mr. Jacob said the
applicant should consider building on the other side. He
noted they will also have to build a sidewalk on Shelburne
Rd.
Mr. Weith said the plan also shows pavement in the CO Zone
which is not allowed. Filling is also not allowed in this
zone. The applicant said they may be able to revise this.
Mr. Weith said a storm water analysis by Heindel & Noyes will
also be required. He also advised that this is the area
where the Southern Connector is planned to join with
Shelburne Rd. in the future.
Nancy Knox said there are 2 houses on the site which would
come down. Some fill would be required. There would be 259
parking spaces, mostly in front. There would be a service
drive all around. They will extend the existing culvert
beyond the edge of the parking and will tie into the 16"
water main. They would also tap into the sewer on the we
side of Shelburne Rd. There is a Vermont Electric right -
way on the back of the property, but the project would nc
impact that. There would be landscaping on the perimeter
on islands. The back area would be left as is. Ms. Peac
said it may not be enough for the applicant to say they "
take care of the culvert."
Mr. Murphy said that regarding the pcd they are concerned
with the frontage requirement and the concern with having
level of service C for approaches to the site. He said t
feel this is one use and therefore should not be a pcd.
was concerned this standard had not been applied to other
similar projects such as Tinguinis. He said if the
Commission does decide this is a pcd, he would like it cl
whether they can waive the frontage and traffic standards
2. Site plan application of 3060 Associates for 1) owe_
of a car sales facility and 2) construction of a 600 s,• 1
addition to an existing 15,000 sq. ft. building, 3060
Williston Road
Mr. caP;_th said ti,e . applicant was before the Commissietl 9
year. This is a revision to the previous approval.
Mr. Dugan said they got permission for a 5,000 sq. tt•
sales facility. This did not come to fruition and t't`
new proposal. Front yard and circulation would be
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
December 9, 1988
Ms. Genie Soboslai
Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc.
The Maltex Building
431 Pine Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: S.B. Tanger & Company, Shelburne Road Project
Dear Ms. Soboslai:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also
enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
N
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 13, 1988
at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request.
Sincerely,
oe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
Encls
gown (9f
Conway
Center Conway, New Hampshire 03813 (603)447-3811
January 3, 1989
Joe Weith, City Planner
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Joe:
Enclosed is (XiN ad that describes the projects that Stanley Tanger
has built. He has a pretty good r putation here in Conway for
complying with the regulations an ith the plan as it is approved.
In other words, he will do what h says he will do.
I understand that he doesn't hesitate to call in the attorneys
if necessary.
Best of luck to you in 1989. Please call if you have any questions
or if I can help in any way.
Sincerely
�-O-Jva 11
Jane B . Lafleur ,
Town Planner
M E M O R A D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Joe Weith, City Planner
Re: December 13, 1988 agenda items
Date: December 9, 1988
1) S.B. TANGER & COMPANY, RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. SHELBURNE ROAD
S.B. Tanger & Company proposes to construct a 47,000 square foot
building containing a number of retail stores on a 4.69 acre
parcel on Shelburne Road. The parcel is located on the west side
of Shelburne Road south of Shearer Chevrolet. The lot is bounded
on the south by a vacant lot, on the west by Vermont Railway and
on the east by Shelburne Road. A single-family residence is
located directly across Shelburne Road. A streams runs across
the western portion of the property.
It is my interpretation and also the City Attorney's that this
project constitutes a planned commercial development (PCD) as
defined in the City zoning regulations (Section 21.122). PCD's
in the Commercial 2 zone require a minimum frontage of 350 feet.
The parcel in question has a frontage of only 311 feet.
Therefore, the proposed project does not meet minimum frontage
requirements. The applicant's attorney questioned whether
Section 11.507 allows the Planning Commission to modify the
minimum frontage standard if the Commission determines that the
limitations of the site cause unusual hardship in complying with
this standard.
The applicant's attorney has also questioned whether this project
actually is a PCD as defined. He is going to send a letter to
Steve Stitzel and Steve will be present at the meeting to discuss
these issues.
Access/Circulation: Access would be from a 35 foot wide curb out
on Shelburne Road. Circulation is provided around the entire
building.
Setbacks/coverage: The plan meets setback requirements. The
zoning data on the map indicates that building and lot coverage
requirements are met. I will check these before Tuesday's
meeting. I will also check on whether front yard coverage is
being met.
Parking: The plan requires 259 parking spaces based on the
Cit.y's zoning regulations. The plan shows 259 spaces.
Traffic: I recommend that a traffic analysis be conducted. The
analysis should evaluate the impact of the project on the Harbor
View Road and Green Mountain Drive intersections. The analysis
should also determine the projected peak hour trip generation.
1
Memorandum - Planning
December 13, 1988 agenda items
December 9, 1988
Page 2
This lot is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows a
maximum trip generation of 230 trips.
Conservation Zone: The project shows proposed filling and
pavement within the 50 foot conservation zone of the stream
located on the site.
2) 3060 ASSOCIATES, 3060 WILLISTON ROAD
3060 Associates received Site Plan approval on 8/11/87 for
construction of a 5000 square foot addition to a 15,000 square
foot building for a boat sales facility, and to construct a
separate 6000 square foot building for storage and distribution.
The applicant proposes to revise the approved site plan to
construct a 600 square foot addition instead of a 5000 square
foot addition and to use this addition and front parking lot for
automobile sales instead of boat sales. The new 6000 square foot
building is still proposed.
The property is zoned I.-C. The property is bounded on the west
by an office building, on the east by a mobile home business, on
the north by the airport, and on the south by Williston Road.
Enclosed are the minutes from the previous approval.
Access/Circulation: Access will be maintained from the private
road off of Williston Road. This road is on the applicant's
property and runs along the east property line back to the
airport.
Circulation is provided entirely around the main building.
Coverage/setback: Setback requirements are met. Building and
front yard coverage requirements are met. The project
information on the plan indicates that total lot coverage is
69.6% (70% maximum allowed). I will check this prior to
Tuesday's meeting.
Parking: Based on existing uses, plus the addition and new
building, the property requires 48 spaces. The plan shows 76
spaces. This allows 28 spaces for automobile display. Vehicle
display should only be allowed in the 28 spaces directly in front
of the proposed addition so as not to disrupt parking
accessibility for the other businesses on the site.
I noticed that, currently, a sufficient number of cars parallel
park along the west side of the private road. Note that Mr.
Fa
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1983
The South Burlington Planning Commission field a regular meeting on Tuesday,
February 22, 1983 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
George Mona, Vice Chairman; Kirk 'Foolery, Peter Jacob, Judy Hurd, Mary -Barbara Maher
Members Absent
Sidney Poger, Chairman; John Belter
Others Present
David Spitz, Planner; Roger Dickinson, Mervin Brown, Robert Deckelbaum, Carl
Lisman, Steve Page, William Schuele, Lowell Krassner, Dan Boyd, Gail Simons,
Kevin O'Brien, Richard Weiskel, George Chiu, Paul Joppe-Mercure, Robert Krebs,
Barry Carris, Regional Planning Commission; John Larkin, George Brady, Fred
Johnstone, Kenneth Pinkham, Edwin Granai, Richard Segal
Minutes of February 8, 1983 and ,joint Commission - Zoning Board meeting of January
31 1983
The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 8, 1983 were
approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery, a second by Mrs. Maher and a vote of 4
yes. Mr. Jacob abstained.
The minutes of the joint Planning Commission - Zoning Board meeting of
January 31, 1983 were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery, a second by Mrs.
Hurd, and a vote of 4 yes. Mr. Jacob abstained.
Continuation of the public hearing on the final plat application for V.L. Properties,
Inc. for a 4.9 acre planned commercial development on Dorset St.
Mr. Jacob removed 'himself' from the discussion on this item due to a conflict
of interest.
Mr. Spitz noted that the Commission had requested some changes to the plan
at the last meeting. Fie said there were still some details to be worked out on
the number of parking spaces required. For calculating the required amount, the
recent Factory Outlet application used the gross leasable area of the building,
not the gross floor area. The Commission never specifically stated which one was
to be used for calculations, so Mr. Spitz checked the other relevant applications
plus the national standards, which refer to leasable area. If leasable area is
used here, the applicant might be able to drop 30 spaces, which could be added
later if conditions warranted. Mrs. Maher felt it should be the Commission which
determined whether those spaces were needed later.
Mr. Page, representing the developer, said the building location had been
shifted to allow more green area between the entrances to the buildings and the
parking lot. There will now be planting beds. Overall floor area is unchanged.
One additional catch -basin has been added and storm water direction has been
indicated. Some curbing to contain drainage has been added. The sidewalk is on
the south side of the drive, and a turnaround has been added to the parking lot
on the north.
As far as landscaping, fir. Page said the size of the planting beds in front
of the building had been increased, and there are larger hardwood trees shown in
those areas. Pines have been added to screen the building on the north property line.
PLANNING COMMISSION
11 NOVEMBER 1986
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on
Tuesday, 11 November 1986, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference
Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Peter Jacob, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, William Burgess,
John Belter, Judith Hurd, Catherine Peacock, John Dooley
Also Present
Jane Lafleur, Planner; Sidney Poger, The Other Paper; Bernard
Brown, David Spitz, Tony Pomerleau, Robert Karol, Lea
Hohenschau, Normand Nadeau, Michael Dugan, Richard & Marsha
Alvarez, P. Anthony Blake, David Bogue, T. E. Clune, Edwin
Sanborn, Craig Leiner, Douglas Fitzpatrick, Chris Dunn, T.
Barnabas Kane, Karen Unsworth, Colin Lindberg, Mark Beaulac,
Frank Reardon, Katherine Hardin, Susan Hardin, Gary Farrell,
Dennis Pomerleau, Randy Wilson, Frank Nuzzolo, Peppy Nuzzolo,
Ernie Pomerleau, Jim Condos, Mr. Bissonette, Tom Chase
1. PUBLIC,. HEARING: Preliminary plat application of Antonio
"Pomerleau,�Brassard Automotive, Vermont Federal Bank & Mark
_R0^1-t0n-for-• a planned commercial development consisting of a
31,960 sq. ft. addition to the Grand Union shopping center, a
1161 sq. ft. addition to the Vermont Federal Bank, a 108-room
hotel, and demolition of 3 buildings at 32-40 Hinesburg Rd.
and Williston Rd.
Ernie Pomerleau presented the plan. He said they are trying
to consolidate a number of parcels into a unit. The
Hinesburg Rd. access will be moved toward the north. It will
provide better stacking and more landscaping. There will be
continuous sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd.
They will be extending the bank off the back end. Since
stacking at the drive -up lanes now creates a problem, these
lanes will be moved into the parking lot to a position that
will allow for 3 lanes with 4-car stacking in each. Mr.
Burgess said he did not think an exit from the bank onto
Willston Rd. was an improvement over an exit onto Hinesburg
Rd. Mr. Pomerleau noted it would be a right -turn only lane
and that the median would be extended to preclude left turns.
There would also be appropriate signage.
Three accesses will be closed on Williston Rd, leaving 2
open. In addition to the bank access, the one remaining will
an in "in" only with right and left turns in allowed. This,
they feel, is needed to serve the small shops. Mr. Dooley
questioned the opening between the hotel and the small
stores. Mr. Pomerleau said this would allow more circulation
PLANNING COMMISSION
25 FEBRUARY 1986
PAGE 3
4. The building permit shall be otained within 6 months.
Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.
3. Consider sketch plan application of-Heathcote AssoC:, for
construction of a 27,600 sq• ft. addition foretail sales
and relocation of bank facility at the Factory Outlet Mall-,
Shelburne Rd.
Mr. Mehler said retail space would be 25,000 sq. ft. Part of
the plan is to relocate the Chittenden Bank unit to make the
site less congested. Mrs. Lafleur said she is not pleased
with the new location of the bank as she felt it would
disrupt traffic circulation patterns. Mr. Mehler said that
at present rear parking is underutilized and the rear of the
mall is dead space from a retail point of view. The proposed
T.J. Maxx store would be a needed anchor to attract shoppers
to the rear of the site. They have also exercised their
option and will get 1/2 acre more parking if the Southern
Connector is built. They will also do more landscaping.
Mr. Burgess said he is concerned with traffic and parking in
adjacent properties. Mrs. Hurd agreed and added this is
already a dangerous lot with narrow aisles, and she would not
like to see the bank up front. Mr. Burgess felt that by its
visibility it might draw more traffic, but he wasn't too
concerned especially as there is a curb between the bank and
Odell Parkway. Mr. Jacob felt T.J. Maxx would draw cars to
the rear of the lot and would help the problem. Mr. Dooley
felt he would have to know where the drive-in window was to
be located before making a judgment.
Members then considered the lot coverage issue. Coverage is
now 93% and would probably go up to 94%. Mrs. Hurd felt they
should do something to bring down the coverage. Ms. Peacock
agreed.
Regarding parking, Mr. Mehler noted they now require 5.5 and
have provision for 6. By utilizing the compact car sapces
where the bank now is, and realigning some spaces, they would
be short about 16 spaces or 2%. With the plan utilizing the
additional 1/2 acre, they would be short only 6 spaces, or
less than 1%. All rear parking spaces belong to the Factory
Outlet Mall. Mr. Mehler added they would be willing to con-
sider curbing the area in front of the stores for safety and
will redo existing islands. A plan will be submitted. They
are also aware of the traffic study to be conducted and have
hired Roger Dickinson to do it. Mrs. Lafleur said Craig
Leiner has already been informed of this. Mrs. Lafleur will
calculate total lot coverage, width of aisles & spaces, and
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 19, 1985
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a special meeting on Tuesday,
February 19, 1985 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Sidney Poger, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Peter Jacob, William Burgess, Judy
Hurd
Members Absent
John Dooley, John Belter
Others Present
Jane Bechtel, City Planner; Ruth Poger, The Other Paper; William Schuele and
Lowell Krassner, Natural Resources Committee; Karen Pettersen, Genie Soboslai,
Elizabeth & Yigal Ehrlich, Kevin O'Brien,Maurice & Theresa Paquette, Paula
Newman, Bill Schroeder, Larry Chetti, Rod Geant, Marsha Smith, George Khouri,
Soon Kwon
Final plat application of the University Mall Realty Trust for a two-phase
expansion plan consisting of a new 48,000 sq. ft. building with parking and
the southerly entrance relocation in Phase I, and in Phase II, the addition
to the southern wing of the mall, the relocation of Hilsons and the removal
of the existing Hilsons and Martin's buildings
Mr. George Khouri said the developers had responded to the concerns
raised by the Commission at the preliminary hearing. The total footprint of
the building has been reduced from preliminary. The parking ratio is now
about 5.3-5.4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area (GLA).
Ms. Bechtel said the Fire Chief had not had time to get a memo to the
Commission, but he had told her that he needed more information and
that he did not want to hold up the approval.
Mr. Khouri said that in phase 1, Martins would be relocated to the
southernmost part of the property, and parking and site work in connection with
the move would be done. The southern entrance to the mall would be changed
in this phase. The present entrance/exit would be closed, and a new one
built farther south, just south of Janes & Jacob and north of Hedman. There
will be a light at this new access. There was some discussion about whether
the light serving the present access would be removed. Ms.Bechtel was not
sure about that, although she did not think 3 lights in the area between this
new southerly entrance and the present main Mall entrance were needed.
Mr. Khouri said landscaping along the Interstate fence behind the main
part of the mall would be done as part of phase 1. A row of parking will be
removed in that area to allow room for the landscaping.
Mr. Khouri was asked about the use for the existing Martin's building
once the new one was built. He said they would like to lease it, although
he was not sure they could find a tenant for it. Calculations for required
parking include the square footage of that existing building.
C Mrs. Hurd felt siguage in the mall area should be looked at, because bf
all the changes being made.
A member of the audience asked about the new light at the new southerly
entrance being put in in conjunction with the Dorset Street widening project,
which project has not been approved by Act 250 yet. There was some discussion
961,4 '9 s� Hod IZP
�pl�i aQ� L 1T
oth
09
o A !,
C?a.4
�? 2
,::7 2 �a 2
P i?5
%,
o
os
L'lle = 0576- S5/ / 7044F
ob
LL2
os
ja Z
vo/ s/
s3�L
5 '5'7 V---7 ?-2r�o *vf Ic-'n(::;�q
A G E N D A
r
South Burlington Planning Comshission
City Hall Conference Rom
575 Dorset Street�'/
South Burlington, Ve;,"t
Special Meeting e7:30 P.M. Tue Ada March 31L 1987
1) Minutes of March 17, 1987.
2) Continue discussion of site lan application of Hobie
Richards, John Rao and Antonio Pomerleau for conversion of
the existing building to a whol sale/retail establishment at
1525 Shelburne Road.
Work Session: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SPECIAL MEETING
3) Continue Discussion of Soutw Burlington Zoning Regulations.
a. Airport Approach Cones, (Sections 14.303, 15.303, 19.45,
and 22.104).
b. Dimensional Requireme ts: (Section 18.00).
C. Miscellaneous:
Section 19.152 o undevelopable land for density
and coverage;
Sections 18.104 and 22.102 - Setbacks from inter-
state ramps.
Respectfully submitted,
fI '� n
C)L/(\JL
Jane B . Laf leur, •,,r
City Planner
PLANNING COMMISSION
15 NOVEMBER 1988
PAGE 3
has been designated.
Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site
Plan application of Robert & Sheila Rochefort for operation
of a retail tire and service center in an existing 4800 sq.
ft. building as depicted on a plan titled "Lot #5, Muddy
Brook Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared
Richard McSheffrey and dated September, 1988 last revised
11/15/88 with the following stipulations:
1. This approval is based upon expressed representation of
the applicant that: —
a) all old tires shall be stored in the fenced storage
area
b) there shall be no sale of gasoline
c) there shall be no storage of vehicles longer than 30
days — — — —
d) there shall be no sale of automobiles
e) there shall be no trailers used for storage
2. A $450. 3-year landscape bond shall be posted prior to
permit. The dying pine tree along Palmer Court shall be
replaced 1�y a healthy 6-foot pine tree.
3. The parking lot shall be designed so that the portion of
the lot south of the building shall drain to the east.
4. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or
this approval is null and void. —
Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
6. Consider going into executive session to discuss the
proper review for planned commercial developments
Mr. Poger protested the planned executive session as it did
not meet the criteria for executive sessions but was merely a
procedural discussion.
Mr. Weith noted the definition of pcd's includes commercial &
industrial uses with one owner and a number of businesses.
This means that projects such as those on Ethan Allen Drive
would have to be reviewed in this way because of the in-
dustrial uses. The intent of the language is to review
shopping centers, retail pcds, etc., through the subdivision
regulations.
Mrs. Maher then moved that the South Burlington Planning Com-
mission hold public hearings for the purpose of amending its
subdivision regulations to authorize subdivision review of
PLANNING COMMISSION
15 NOVEMBER 1988
PAGE 4
planned commercial developments for retail use. Ms. Peacock
seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
In the meantime, the City Planner was asked to proceed as in
the past.
Other Business
a) The latest draft of the land use section of the Regional
Plan has been received. A meeting is scheduled for 11/29
with'Regional Planning people to discuss it with them. They
have asked for comments beforehand. The item will be
included in the agenda next week for discussion.
b) At the City Council public hearing on the overlook zoning,
the question of the building envelope came up. The question
was raised whether the Commission decided a building could go
anywhere in the hexagon. Members said it could.
c) An item on next Monday's Burlington Planning Commission
agenda is the addition of 700 seats to Gutterson Field House.
The parking lot will also be expanded. The Commission noted
parking problems in the past and the problems of additional
traffic. It was noted that^any parking expansion will be on
South Burlington property with access in S. Burlington, it
will have to come to this Planning Commission.
d) There is a question of Queen City Park zoning problems.
Members asked that the Zoning Board Chairman come in and
explain the problems.
As there was no further business to come before the
Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:30 pm.
Clerk
�Utttlj +6ttrlingtun +Fire Erepartment
U-1 Bori3et street
-�,i1tttit �.�tirtittgtuii, liErinnnt 0a4111
TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE
RE: DECEMBER 13,1988 AGENDA ITEMS
DATE: DECEMBER 6,1988
1. REYES PROPERTY SHELBURNE ROAD
r E
..I', i
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
(802) 658-7960
PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND TIIE ONLY
PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS
ARE NEEDED AT THE LOCATION MARKED ON TIIE PLAN,
2. 3060 ASSOCIATION 3060 WILLISTON ROAD
PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE, FOLLOWING IS
NEED FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION:
A. ROAD TO FRONT PARKING LOT AND TO GET TO FIRE LANE
MUST BE AT LEAST 24' WIDE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIP.
IN.
B. AT LEAST ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE FRONT
ENTRANCE NEAR THE DRIVE TO THE PROPERTY TO TI-II:: WEST
3. DUNN ASSOCIATES 1100 HINESBURG ROAD
PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR
FIRE PROTECTION:
A. A BETTER ACCESS AROUND BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
B . AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ON TILE PROPERTY AT A
LOCATION APPROVED BY 'PHIS DEPARTMENT.
M E M. O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: December 13, 1988 agenda items
Date: December 9, 1988
2) 3060 WILLISTON ROAD COMMERCIAL BUILDING
1. Sewer ar►d water mains along Williston Road shall be shown on
the approved record plan.
2. Improvements to the Williston Road intersection to allow for
left turns should be marked. Traffic signals may also be
justified. Tenants of this commercial development are
complaining to the City to improve that intersection and install
signals.
3. Sidewalk along Williston Road frontage or assessment for
sidewalk is justified at this location.
1) RETAIL STORES _ REYES PROPERTY, SHELBURNE ROAD
1. Building location should be reversed for the following
reasons:
a) The large culvert pipe (66 inch) serves a large area, it
is very deep ( 15 - 20 feet) putting a large building
this close to this drainageway will make it very
difficult; to maintain. The new owner will be
responsible to maintain this pipe. The owner of the
property received permission from the State to extend
this pipe several years ago.
b) The building where shown is constructed almost entirely
on a deep fill area. That fill was loosely placed over
several ,years, Settlement will occur and damage this
large structure.
2. A sidewalk should be included along Shelburne Road.
Acceleration and deceleration lanes and traffic signal should
also be considered at Shelburne Road.
3. Plan should have dimensions.
to settle every distance.
Staff should not be required
1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGION
Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN
1) Name, address, and phone number of:
a. Owner of record Albert J. Reyes and/or Rita J. Reyes
1693 Shelburne Rd
South Burlington, VT 05403 862-5088
b. Applicant S. B. Tanger & Co. Inc.
885 Third Ave.
New York, NY 10022 (212) MR-7323
c. Contact person Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc.
The Maltex Buildinq 431 Pine Street
Burlington, VT 05401 658-5588
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including
number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s).
Parcel is located on Shelburne Road south of Bartlett Bav_Rnad
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc)
Purchase Agreement
4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties State of Vermont,
Peter Bouyea, Vermont Railway & Shearer Chevrolet
5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Existing Champlain Water
ROW, existing V.E:1:-CO. ROW
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities
such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.
Proposed utilities include water and sewer service connections
and extension of existinq 66" culvert.
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or
by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub-
division, and include the dates of such actions:
None known
8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information:
1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties.
2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of
record and (b) proposed subdivision.
3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of
existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove-
nants.
4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets,
utilities, and open space.
5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic).
6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property
and surrounding area.
(Sic�nat ui �) ,gyp ) cant or cxmtact 1 r-r ;can �3.�t