Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1693 Shelburne Road (2)i `y� SpVSN BU11tIFCTp�, V A~O f •, e ~tp� TOWN PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 February 6, 1989 Mr. Peter Tanger S.B. Tanger & Company, Inc. 885 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Re: Retail Complex, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Tanger: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the December 13, 1988 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Ms. Genie Soboslai Mr. Liam Murphy MIDDLEBURY: PETER F. LANGROCK JON C. STAHL (1940-1985) ELLEN MERCER FALLON WILLIAM B. MILLER, JR. JAMES W. SWIFT EMILY J. JOSELSON JOHN F. EVERS SUSAN M. MURRAY JOHN L. KELLNER ANNA E. SAXMAN LANGROCK SPERRY PARKER & WOOL ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MIDDLEBURY: BURLINGTON: 15 S. PLEASANT STREET P.O. DRAWER 351 MIDDLEBURY, VERMONT 05753-035 1 802-388-6356 October 28, 1988 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: 275 COLLEGE STREET P.O. Box 721 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0721 802-864-0217 BURLINGTON: MICHAEL W. WOOL FRED I. PARKER MARK L. SPERRY LIAM L. MURPHY THOMAS Z. CARLSON ALISON J. BELL REPLY TO: BURLINGTON OFFICE This letter is to follow up our discussion regarding the traffic overlay provisions of the City of South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. As we discussed, I would like to clarify two matters. First, in regard to a proposed use, can we receive an advance determination of the category of use under the Traffic Generation Data and Calculation Procedures (Page 83, Table III) of the Zoning Regulations? Second, if the use is categorized as one of those listed in the above -referenced table, may we rely on the traffic generation data in such table or must we do an independent traffic study? More specifically, my client is interested in purchasing a parcel of land adjacent to a road which is categorized as "Zone 5" on the traffic overlay map. My client plans to develop a 50,000+ square foot Specialty Retail Center containing shops specializing in quality clothing and hard goods. In fact, the center would contain stores similar to the Specialty Retail Center containing outlet stores next to the Grand Union on Shelburne Road and similar to the Tennybrook Square on Route 7 in Shelburne, except that the quality of the merchandise would be higher. We would like a determination of whether this proposed use would fit within the category in Table 3 listed as "Specialty Retail Center". The proposed use currently appears to fit within the description of a "Specialty Retail Center" in the September 1987 Traffic Generation report by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mr. Joe Weith October 28, 1988 Further, we would like to determine that if the proposed use does fit within the "Specialty Retail Center" category of use whether we would be able to use the trip generation determinations in Table III. Further, we would like to confirm our understand that if the proposed use did qualify as a "Specialty Retail Center" in Zone 5 that 10,000 G.F.A. would be permitted for each 40,000 square feet of lot area. I understand that you will be raising these issues with the Planning Commission on Tuesday evening, November 1, 1988. If you wish any additional information or if you would like me to attend the Commission's meeting, please let me know. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Liam L. Murphy LLM:TMWC r, F PLANNING COMMISSION 13 DECEMBER 1988 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 13 December 1988, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, Mary -Barbara Maher, Ann Pugh, William Craig Also Present Joe Weith, City Planner; Stephen Stitzel, City Attorney; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Peter Tanger, Liam Murphy, Nancy Knox, Larry Bagdan, Kevin McGonagle, Michael Dugan, Alex Rose, Robert Miller 1. Sketch plan application of S.B. Tanger & Cow �Inc;p�for con- struction of a 47,000 sq. oreson a 4.69 acre lot, Shelburne Rd. Mr. Tanger located the lots south of Shearer Chevrolet. He said there are 2 curb cuts now which will be consolidated into one. It would be a specialty retail center of factory outlet stores exclusively. The maximum 30o coverage would allow 61,420 sq. ft. It would be zone 5 for traffic. They propose only 47,000 sq. ft.. They feel a specialty use retail center is a permitted use for the lots. Mr. Jacob noted receipt of a letter from Liam Murphy, attorney for the applicant, regarding whether this should be pcd or site plan review. Mr. Weith noted that a few weeks ago the Commission decided such applicants would be handled as pcd's. Mr. Murphy said they don't dispute this is a sub- division, but they dispute whether it is a pcd or a permitted use. Mr. Burgess said the Commission will view it as a pcd until it hears otherwise from the City Attorney. The question then arose as to whether the Commission can waive the frontage standard for a pcd. Mr.!,bith said according to Sect. 11.507, it can. Mr. Weith noted they don't meet front yard coverage requirement. Regarding traffic, he recommended a traffic analysis with impacts on Allen Rd, Green Mountain Drive/Bartlett Bay Rd., also trip generations and the possibility of a deceleration lane. Mr. Burgess said the main criteria will be whether the project causes undue traffic congestion at nearby intersections. Mrs. Maher said she would like to know how dangerous turning movements in and out of the development will be. Mr. Tanger said they wouldn't be servicing commuter traffic and their main business times would be Saturdays and weekdays from 2-4 pm and 7-9 pm. PLANNING COMMISSION 13 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 2 Mrs. Maher noted the City Engineer's concern with where the building is placed on the lot because of the looseness of fill. Mr. Tanger said if it needs to be compacted, they will do so. Mr. Weith also noted the culvert is very deep and the proposed building might be in the way. Mr. Jacob said the applicant should consider building on the other side. He noted they will also have to build a sidewalk on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Weith said the plan also shows pavement in the CO Zone which is not allowed. Filling is also not allowed in this zone. The applicant said they may be able to revise this. Mr. Weith said a storm water analysis by Heindel & Noyes will also be required. He also advised that this is the area where the Southern Connector is planned to join with Shelburne Rd. in the future. Nancy Knox said there are 2 houses on the site which would come down. Some fill would be required. There would be 259 parking spaces, mostly in front. There would be a service drive all around. They will extend the existing culvert beyond the edge of the parking and will tie into the 16" water main. They would also tap into the sewer on the we side of Shelburne Rd. There is a Vermont Electric right - way on the back of the property, but the project would nc impact that. There would be landscaping on the perimeter on islands. The back area would be left as is. Ms. Peac said it may not be enough for the applicant to say they " take care of the culvert." Mr. Murphy said that regarding the pcd they are concerned with the frontage requirement and the concern with having level of service C for approaches to the site. He said t feel this is one use and therefore should not be a pcd. was concerned this standard had not been applied to other similar projects such as Tinguinis. He said if the Commission does decide this is a pcd, he would like it cl whether they can waive the frontage and traffic standards 2. Site plan application of 3060 Associates for 1) owe_ of a car sales facility and 2) construction of a 600 s,• 1 addition to an existing 15,000 sq. ft. building, 3060 Williston Road Mr. caP;_th said ti,e . applicant was before the Commissietl 9 year. This is a revision to the previous approval. Mr. Dugan said they got permission for a 5,000 sq. tt• sales facility. This did not come to fruition and t't` new proposal. Front yard and circulation would be PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 December 9, 1988 Ms. Genie Soboslai Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. The Maltex Building 431 Pine Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: S.B. Tanger & Company, Shelburne Road Project Dear Ms. Soboslai: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. N Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 13, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls gown (9f Conway Center Conway, New Hampshire 03813 (603)447-3811 January 3, 1989 Joe Weith, City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: Enclosed is (XiN ad that describes the projects that Stanley Tanger has built. He has a pretty good r putation here in Conway for complying with the regulations an ith the plan as it is approved. In other words, he will do what h says he will do. I understand that he doesn't hesitate to call in the attorneys if necessary. Best of luck to you in 1989. Please call if you have any questions or if I can help in any way. Sincerely �-O-Jva 11 Jane B . Lafleur , Town Planner M E M O R A D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 13, 1988 agenda items Date: December 9, 1988 1) S.B. TANGER & COMPANY, RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. SHELBURNE ROAD S.B. Tanger & Company proposes to construct a 47,000 square foot building containing a number of retail stores on a 4.69 acre parcel on Shelburne Road. The parcel is located on the west side of Shelburne Road south of Shearer Chevrolet. The lot is bounded on the south by a vacant lot, on the west by Vermont Railway and on the east by Shelburne Road. A single-family residence is located directly across Shelburne Road. A streams runs across the western portion of the property. It is my interpretation and also the City Attorney's that this project constitutes a planned commercial development (PCD) as defined in the City zoning regulations (Section 21.122). PCD's in the Commercial 2 zone require a minimum frontage of 350 feet. The parcel in question has a frontage of only 311 feet. Therefore, the proposed project does not meet minimum frontage requirements. The applicant's attorney questioned whether Section 11.507 allows the Planning Commission to modify the minimum frontage standard if the Commission determines that the limitations of the site cause unusual hardship in complying with this standard. The applicant's attorney has also questioned whether this project actually is a PCD as defined. He is going to send a letter to Steve Stitzel and Steve will be present at the meeting to discuss these issues. Access/Circulation: Access would be from a 35 foot wide curb out on Shelburne Road. Circulation is provided around the entire building. Setbacks/coverage: The plan meets setback requirements. The zoning data on the map indicates that building and lot coverage requirements are met. I will check these before Tuesday's meeting. I will also check on whether front yard coverage is being met. Parking: The plan requires 259 parking spaces based on the Cit.y's zoning regulations. The plan shows 259 spaces. Traffic: I recommend that a traffic analysis be conducted. The analysis should evaluate the impact of the project on the Harbor View Road and Green Mountain Drive intersections. The analysis should also determine the projected peak hour trip generation. 1 Memorandum - Planning December 13, 1988 agenda items December 9, 1988 Page 2 This lot is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows a maximum trip generation of 230 trips. Conservation Zone: The project shows proposed filling and pavement within the 50 foot conservation zone of the stream located on the site. 2) 3060 ASSOCIATES, 3060 WILLISTON ROAD 3060 Associates received Site Plan approval on 8/11/87 for construction of a 5000 square foot addition to a 15,000 square foot building for a boat sales facility, and to construct a separate 6000 square foot building for storage and distribution. The applicant proposes to revise the approved site plan to construct a 600 square foot addition instead of a 5000 square foot addition and to use this addition and front parking lot for automobile sales instead of boat sales. The new 6000 square foot building is still proposed. The property is zoned I.-C. The property is bounded on the west by an office building, on the east by a mobile home business, on the north by the airport, and on the south by Williston Road. Enclosed are the minutes from the previous approval. Access/Circulation: Access will be maintained from the private road off of Williston Road. This road is on the applicant's property and runs along the east property line back to the airport. Circulation is provided entirely around the main building. Coverage/setback: Setback requirements are met. Building and front yard coverage requirements are met. The project information on the plan indicates that total lot coverage is 69.6% (70% maximum allowed). I will check this prior to Tuesday's meeting. Parking: Based on existing uses, plus the addition and new building, the property requires 48 spaces. The plan shows 76 spaces. This allows 28 spaces for automobile display. Vehicle display should only be allowed in the 28 spaces directly in front of the proposed addition so as not to disrupt parking accessibility for the other businesses on the site. I noticed that, currently, a sufficient number of cars parallel park along the west side of the private road. Note that Mr. Fa PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22, 1983 The South Burlington Planning Commission field a regular meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 1983 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present George Mona, Vice Chairman; Kirk 'Foolery, Peter Jacob, Judy Hurd, Mary -Barbara Maher Members Absent Sidney Poger, Chairman; John Belter Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Roger Dickinson, Mervin Brown, Robert Deckelbaum, Carl Lisman, Steve Page, William Schuele, Lowell Krassner, Dan Boyd, Gail Simons, Kevin O'Brien, Richard Weiskel, George Chiu, Paul Joppe-Mercure, Robert Krebs, Barry Carris, Regional Planning Commission; John Larkin, George Brady, Fred Johnstone, Kenneth Pinkham, Edwin Granai, Richard Segal Minutes of February 8, 1983 and ,joint Commission - Zoning Board meeting of January 31 1983 The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of February 8, 1983 were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery, a second by Mrs. Maher and a vote of 4 yes. Mr. Jacob abstained. The minutes of the joint Planning Commission - Zoning Board meeting of January 31, 1983 were approved on a motion by Mr. Woolery, a second by Mrs. Hurd, and a vote of 4 yes. Mr. Jacob abstained. Continuation of the public hearing on the final plat application for V.L. Properties, Inc. for a 4.9 acre planned commercial development on Dorset St. Mr. Jacob removed 'himself' from the discussion on this item due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Spitz noted that the Commission had requested some changes to the plan at the last meeting. Fie said there were still some details to be worked out on the number of parking spaces required. For calculating the required amount, the recent Factory Outlet application used the gross leasable area of the building, not the gross floor area. The Commission never specifically stated which one was to be used for calculations, so Mr. Spitz checked the other relevant applications plus the national standards, which refer to leasable area. If leasable area is used here, the applicant might be able to drop 30 spaces, which could be added later if conditions warranted. Mrs. Maher felt it should be the Commission which determined whether those spaces were needed later. Mr. Page, representing the developer, said the building location had been shifted to allow more green area between the entrances to the buildings and the parking lot. There will now be planting beds. Overall floor area is unchanged. One additional catch -basin has been added and storm water direction has been indicated. Some curbing to contain drainage has been added. The sidewalk is on the south side of the drive, and a turnaround has been added to the parking lot on the north. As far as landscaping, fir. Page said the size of the planting beds in front of the building had been increased, and there are larger hardwood trees shown in those areas. Pines have been added to screen the building on the north property line. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 NOVEMBER 1986 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 11 November 1986, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Peter Jacob, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, William Burgess, John Belter, Judith Hurd, Catherine Peacock, John Dooley Also Present Jane Lafleur, Planner; Sidney Poger, The Other Paper; Bernard Brown, David Spitz, Tony Pomerleau, Robert Karol, Lea Hohenschau, Normand Nadeau, Michael Dugan, Richard & Marsha Alvarez, P. Anthony Blake, David Bogue, T. E. Clune, Edwin Sanborn, Craig Leiner, Douglas Fitzpatrick, Chris Dunn, T. Barnabas Kane, Karen Unsworth, Colin Lindberg, Mark Beaulac, Frank Reardon, Katherine Hardin, Susan Hardin, Gary Farrell, Dennis Pomerleau, Randy Wilson, Frank Nuzzolo, Peppy Nuzzolo, Ernie Pomerleau, Jim Condos, Mr. Bissonette, Tom Chase 1. PUBLIC,. HEARING: Preliminary plat application of Antonio "Pomerleau,�Brassard Automotive, Vermont Federal Bank & Mark _R0^1-t0n-for-• a planned commercial development consisting of a 31,960 sq. ft. addition to the Grand Union shopping center, a 1161 sq. ft. addition to the Vermont Federal Bank, a 108-room hotel, and demolition of 3 buildings at 32-40 Hinesburg Rd. and Williston Rd. Ernie Pomerleau presented the plan. He said they are trying to consolidate a number of parcels into a unit. The Hinesburg Rd. access will be moved toward the north. It will provide better stacking and more landscaping. There will be continuous sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd. They will be extending the bank off the back end. Since stacking at the drive -up lanes now creates a problem, these lanes will be moved into the parking lot to a position that will allow for 3 lanes with 4-car stacking in each. Mr. Burgess said he did not think an exit from the bank onto Willston Rd. was an improvement over an exit onto Hinesburg Rd. Mr. Pomerleau noted it would be a right -turn only lane and that the median would be extended to preclude left turns. There would also be appropriate signage. Three accesses will be closed on Williston Rd, leaving 2 open. In addition to the bank access, the one remaining will an in "in" only with right and left turns in allowed. This, they feel, is needed to serve the small shops. Mr. Dooley questioned the opening between the hotel and the small stores. Mr. Pomerleau said this would allow more circulation PLANNING COMMISSION 25 FEBRUARY 1986 PAGE 3 4. The building permit shall be otained within 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Consider sketch plan application of-Heathcote AssoC:, for construction of a 27,600 sq• ft. addition foretail sales and relocation of bank facility at the Factory Outlet Mall-, Shelburne Rd. Mr. Mehler said retail space would be 25,000 sq. ft. Part of the plan is to relocate the Chittenden Bank unit to make the site less congested. Mrs. Lafleur said she is not pleased with the new location of the bank as she felt it would disrupt traffic circulation patterns. Mr. Mehler said that at present rear parking is underutilized and the rear of the mall is dead space from a retail point of view. The proposed T.J. Maxx store would be a needed anchor to attract shoppers to the rear of the site. They have also exercised their option and will get 1/2 acre more parking if the Southern Connector is built. They will also do more landscaping. Mr. Burgess said he is concerned with traffic and parking in adjacent properties. Mrs. Hurd agreed and added this is already a dangerous lot with narrow aisles, and she would not like to see the bank up front. Mr. Burgess felt that by its visibility it might draw more traffic, but he wasn't too concerned especially as there is a curb between the bank and Odell Parkway. Mr. Jacob felt T.J. Maxx would draw cars to the rear of the lot and would help the problem. Mr. Dooley felt he would have to know where the drive-in window was to be located before making a judgment. Members then considered the lot coverage issue. Coverage is now 93% and would probably go up to 94%. Mrs. Hurd felt they should do something to bring down the coverage. Ms. Peacock agreed. Regarding parking, Mr. Mehler noted they now require 5.5 and have provision for 6. By utilizing the compact car sapces where the bank now is, and realigning some spaces, they would be short about 16 spaces or 2%. With the plan utilizing the additional 1/2 acre, they would be short only 6 spaces, or less than 1%. All rear parking spaces belong to the Factory Outlet Mall. Mr. Mehler added they would be willing to con- sider curbing the area in front of the stores for safety and will redo existing islands. A plan will be submitted. They are also aware of the traffic study to be conducted and have hired Roger Dickinson to do it. Mrs. Lafleur said Craig Leiner has already been informed of this. Mrs. Lafleur will calculate total lot coverage, width of aisles & spaces, and PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 19, 1985 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a special meeting on Tuesday, February 19, 1985 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Peter Jacob, William Burgess, Judy Hurd Members Absent John Dooley, John Belter Others Present Jane Bechtel, City Planner; Ruth Poger, The Other Paper; William Schuele and Lowell Krassner, Natural Resources Committee; Karen Pettersen, Genie Soboslai, Elizabeth & Yigal Ehrlich, Kevin O'Brien,Maurice & Theresa Paquette, Paula Newman, Bill Schroeder, Larry Chetti, Rod Geant, Marsha Smith, George Khouri, Soon Kwon Final plat application of the University Mall Realty Trust for a two-phase expansion plan consisting of a new 48,000 sq. ft. building with parking and the southerly entrance relocation in Phase I, and in Phase II, the addition to the southern wing of the mall, the relocation of Hilsons and the removal of the existing Hilsons and Martin's buildings Mr. George Khouri said the developers had responded to the concerns raised by the Commission at the preliminary hearing. The total footprint of the building has been reduced from preliminary. The parking ratio is now about 5.3-5.4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area (GLA). Ms. Bechtel said the Fire Chief had not had time to get a memo to the Commission, but he had told her that he needed more information and that he did not want to hold up the approval. Mr. Khouri said that in phase 1, Martins would be relocated to the southernmost part of the property, and parking and site work in connection with the move would be done. The southern entrance to the mall would be changed in this phase. The present entrance/exit would be closed, and a new one built farther south, just south of Janes & Jacob and north of Hedman. There will be a light at this new access. There was some discussion about whether the light serving the present access would be removed. Ms.Bechtel was not sure about that, although she did not think 3 lights in the area between this new southerly entrance and the present main Mall entrance were needed. Mr. Khouri said landscaping along the Interstate fence behind the main part of the mall would be done as part of phase 1. A row of parking will be removed in that area to allow room for the landscaping. Mr. Khouri was asked about the use for the existing Martin's building once the new one was built. He said they would like to lease it, although he was not sure they could find a tenant for it. Calculations for required parking include the square footage of that existing building. C Mrs. Hurd felt siguage in the mall area should be looked at, because bf all the changes being made. A member of the audience asked about the new light at the new southerly entrance being put in in conjunction with the Dorset Street widening project, which project has not been approved by Act 250 yet. There was some discussion 961,4 '9 s� Hod IZP �pl�i aQ� L 1T oth 09 o A !, C?a.4 �? 2 ,::7 2 �a 2 P i?5 %, o os L'lle = 0576- S5/ / 7044F ob LL2 os ja Z vo/ s/ s3�L 5 '5'7 V---7 ?-2r�o *vf Ic-'n(::;�q A G E N D A r South Burlington Planning Comshission City Hall Conference Rom 575 Dorset Street�'/ South Burlington, Ve;,"t Special Meeting e7:30 P.M. Tue Ada March 31L 1987 1) Minutes of March 17, 1987. 2) Continue discussion of site lan application of Hobie Richards, John Rao and Antonio Pomerleau for conversion of the existing building to a whol sale/retail establishment at 1525 Shelburne Road. Work Session: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SPECIAL MEETING 3) Continue Discussion of Soutw Burlington Zoning Regulations. a. Airport Approach Cones, (Sections 14.303, 15.303, 19.45, and 22.104). b. Dimensional Requireme ts: (Section 18.00). C. Miscellaneous: Section 19.152 o undevelopable land for density and coverage; Sections 18.104 and 22.102 - Setbacks from inter- state ramps. Respectfully submitted, fI '� n C)L/(\JL Jane B . Laf leur, •,,r City Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 15 NOVEMBER 1988 PAGE 3 has been designated. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Robert & Sheila Rochefort for operation of a retail tire and service center in an existing 4800 sq. ft. building as depicted on a plan titled "Lot #5, Muddy Brook Industrial Park, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared Richard McSheffrey and dated September, 1988 last revised 11/15/88 with the following stipulations: 1. This approval is based upon expressed representation of the applicant that: — a) all old tires shall be stored in the fenced storage area b) there shall be no sale of gasoline c) there shall be no storage of vehicles longer than 30 days — — — — d) there shall be no sale of automobiles e) there shall be no trailers used for storage 2. A $450. 3-year landscape bond shall be posted prior to permit. The dying pine tree along Palmer Court shall be replaced 1�y a healthy 6-foot pine tree. 3. The parking lot shall be designed so that the portion of the lot south of the building shall drain to the east. 4. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. — Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Consider going into executive session to discuss the proper review for planned commercial developments Mr. Poger protested the planned executive session as it did not meet the criteria for executive sessions but was merely a procedural discussion. Mr. Weith noted the definition of pcd's includes commercial & industrial uses with one owner and a number of businesses. This means that projects such as those on Ethan Allen Drive would have to be reviewed in this way because of the in- dustrial uses. The intent of the language is to review shopping centers, retail pcds, etc., through the subdivision regulations. Mrs. Maher then moved that the South Burlington Planning Com- mission hold public hearings for the purpose of amending its subdivision regulations to authorize subdivision review of PLANNING COMMISSION 15 NOVEMBER 1988 PAGE 4 planned commercial developments for retail use. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. In the meantime, the City Planner was asked to proceed as in the past. Other Business a) The latest draft of the land use section of the Regional Plan has been received. A meeting is scheduled for 11/29 with'Regional Planning people to discuss it with them. They have asked for comments beforehand. The item will be included in the agenda next week for discussion. b) At the City Council public hearing on the overlook zoning, the question of the building envelope came up. The question was raised whether the Commission decided a building could go anywhere in the hexagon. Members said it could. c) An item on next Monday's Burlington Planning Commission agenda is the addition of 700 seats to Gutterson Field House. The parking lot will also be expanded. The Commission noted parking problems in the past and the problems of additional traffic. It was noted that^any parking expansion will be on South Burlington property with access in S. Burlington, it will have to come to this Planning Commission. d) There is a question of Queen City Park zoning problems. Members asked that the Zoning Board Chairman come in and explain the problems. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:30 pm. Clerk �Utttlj +6ttrlingtun +Fire Erepartment U-1 Bori3et street -�,i1tttit �.�tirtittgtuii, liErinnnt 0a4111 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: DECEMBER 13,1988 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: DECEMBER 6,1988 1. REYES PROPERTY SHELBURNE ROAD r E ..I', i OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND TIIE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ARE NEEDED AT THE LOCATION MARKED ON TIIE PLAN, 2. 3060 ASSOCIATION 3060 WILLISTON ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE, FOLLOWING IS NEED FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTION: A. ROAD TO FRONT PARKING LOT AND TO GET TO FIRE LANE MUST BE AT LEAST 24' WIDE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY EQUIP. IN. B. AT LEAST ONE HYDRANT SHOULD BE INSTALLED BY THE FRONT ENTRANCE NEAR THE DRIVE TO THE PROPERTY TO TI-II:: WEST 3. DUNN ASSOCIATES 1100 HINESBURG ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION: A. A BETTER ACCESS AROUND BUILDING FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT B . AT LEAST TWO (2) HYDRANTS ON TILE PROPERTY AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY 'PHIS DEPARTMENT. M E M. O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: December 13, 1988 agenda items Date: December 9, 1988 2) 3060 WILLISTON ROAD COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1. Sewer ar►d water mains along Williston Road shall be shown on the approved record plan. 2. Improvements to the Williston Road intersection to allow for left turns should be marked. Traffic signals may also be justified. Tenants of this commercial development are complaining to the City to improve that intersection and install signals. 3. Sidewalk along Williston Road frontage or assessment for sidewalk is justified at this location. 1) RETAIL STORES _ REYES PROPERTY, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Building location should be reversed for the following reasons: a) The large culvert pipe (66 inch) serves a large area, it is very deep ( 15 - 20 feet) putting a large building this close to this drainageway will make it very difficult; to maintain. The new owner will be responsible to maintain this pipe. The owner of the property received permission from the State to extend this pipe several years ago. b) The building where shown is constructed almost entirely on a deep fill area. That fill was loosely placed over several ,years, Settlement will occur and damage this large structure. 2. A sidewalk should be included along Shelburne Road. Acceleration and deceleration lanes and traffic signal should also be considered at Shelburne Road. 3. Plan should have dimensions. to settle every distance. Staff should not be required 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGION Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Albert J. Reyes and/or Rita J. Reyes 1693 Shelburne Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 862-5088 b. Applicant S. B. Tanger & Co. Inc. 885 Third Ave. New York, NY 10022 (212) MR-7323 c. Contact person Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. The Maltex Buildinq 431 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401 658-5588 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Parcel is located on Shelburne Road south of Bartlett Bav_Rnad 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc) Purchase Agreement 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties State of Vermont, Peter Bouyea, Vermont Railway & Shearer Chevrolet 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Existing Champlain Water ROW, existing V.E:1:-CO. ROW 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Proposed utilities include water and sewer service connections and extension of existinq 66" culvert. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub- division, and include the dates of such actions: None known 8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information: 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove- nants. 4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. (Sic�nat ui �) ,gyp ) cant or cxmtact 1 r-r ;can �3.�t