Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1691 Shelburne RoadPEERLESS INSURANCE Member Liberty Mutual Group June 17, 2002 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Effective on or about the 18th day of August, 1999, the Peerless Insurance Company issued bond number 018 95-18-09, on behalf of Mac II Holdings, LLC, in favor of the City of South Burlington, in the amount of $5,250.00 for a license or permit bond to perform landscaping at 1691 Shelburne Road. It is our desire to terminate this bond and we hereby give notice that the liability of the Peerless Insurance Company on this bond shall cease on August 18, 2002. Reason for cancellation: Bond no longer needed. Peerless Insurance Company By: �. Rhonda E. Jar ine Attorney -in -Fact cc: 74-10-092 Pomerleau Agency Mac II Holdings, LLC 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 6� ? Peerless Insurance k. Y Nationale Nederlarden North Amerca Property and Casuary Group 62 Maple Avenue Bond No. S- 018 95-18-09 Keene, New Hampshire 03431 LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That We, MAC II HOLDINGS, LLC 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD, S. BURLINGTON, VERMONT , as Principal, and PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, A New Hampshire Corporation, and having its principal office in the City of Keene, New Hampshire, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON hereinafter called the Obligee, in the penal sum of FIVE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY - - - - - - - - - - - - -DOLLARS ($5,250.00 ) lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to said Obligee, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, admin- istrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Signed with our hands and sealed with our seals this 18TH day of AUGUST 1999 WHEREAS, a LICENSE or PERMIT has been granted by the Obligee to the above bounden Principal authorizing said Principal to PERFORM LANDSCAPING AT 1691 SHELBURNE ROAD, S. BURLINGTON, VERMONT Now, therefore, the Condition of this Obligation is such, that if the said Principal shall faithfully observe the provisions of the Laws, Ordinances, and Resolutions, governing the issuance of this License or Permit, then this Obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Liability under this bond shall .terminate as of the 18TH day of AUGUST ,• A,V,K 2002 as to any acts subsequent thereto, unless said bond is continued in force from year to year by the issuance of a continuation certificate signed by the Surety. The Surety may cancel this bond at any time by filing with the Obligee thirty (30) days written notice of its desire to be relieved of liability. The Surety shall not be discharged from any liability already accrued under this bond, or which shall accrue hereunder before the expiration of the thirty day period. ZK� MAC I HOLDINGS, LLC Principal PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY By. C�11 k k 1) # A 11 Iff/41 A 4 A LORRAINE J. C F -' Attorney -in -Fact PSB-226 346-110(4/85) and to bind the Company(ies) making this appointment thereby as fully and to the same extent as if b d r de ak g was signed by the duly authorized officers of the Company(ies), and all the acts of said attorney(s), pursuant to the authoritX>tpi gi e eh e of d and confirmed. AUTHORITY FOR MAKING APPOINT T O S- -F Section 7 of Article 3 of Bylaws of Peerless Insurance Company, as amended M 0 7, tat s: `T n r ce President(s) and Vice Presidents(s)of the Company's Bond Profit Center may appoint and remove Attorneys-in-F d ssthe d vo s appropriate such duties, powers and authority as may be advantageous to the Company including the execution ans id 0 o S, ert recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writings obligatory in the nature. thereof and other documents on beh o th om n wi wer to redelegate such authority." Section 9 of Article 5 of Bylaws of The Netherland ur e o pa y, as e de ay 30, 1997 and June 16, 1997, states: "The Senior Vice President(s) and Vice President(s) of the Company's Bond of C e m y app 'nt d re Attorneys -in -Fact, assign to them and revoke as appropriate such duties, powers and authority as maybe adv eo to a mp inc g the execution and atte tat on of bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and all other writin bli to e n ur th a and other documents on beh o mpany with power to redelegate such authority." E OF FACSIMILE SI S Use of facsimile signatur b P rless s e o any is made pursuant to R sol o the ar of Directors of Peerless Insurance Company, dated April 28,1988. Use of facsi it sig es etherlands Insurance p isNa r ant to s tion of the Board of Directors of The Netherlands Insurance Company, dated ri 1 88. V N A P ENT The company making this appointment is identified by an ` bo o os' e i n in the space provided below. It is the intent of Peerless Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company to use t is stru t the a intment of Attorney(s)-in-Fact for either Company designated, or for both Companies, if so indicated. In Witness Whereof X PEERLESS INSURANCE CO AN X THE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY has/have caused these presents to be signed b its Vice President, and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed by its Assistant Secretary, this 8th day of Yune 1999 PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY THE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY By:� / y`�SutAMc o By: Vice President W °s Vice President i 1901 1978 W Z t Attest: fbE. �• Attest: (//�� 'a.,,,...a'�,,,• Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE COUNTY OF CHESHIRE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8th day of June 1999 , by Matthew Klimczak, Vice President of the Bond Profit Center of Peerless Insurance Company and of The Netherlands Insurance Company and Jane F. Taylor, Assistant Secretary of Peerless Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company, New Hampshire Corporations, on behalf of the corporations. my--. i—pi— 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 FEBRUARY 2001 a. Application of the City of South Burlington to relocate a watercourse in preparation for the construction of a stormwater treatment system, 1691 Shelburne Road. No issues were raised. Mr. Boucher moved to approve the Consent Agenda subject to the conditions in the staff memo of 2 February 2001. Mr. Cameron seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Discussion with VELCO on their proposal to install a spare transformer at the Queen City Substation, Central Avenue: Mr. Dunn noted that VELCO owns and operates the high voltage transmission grid in Vermont. He then briefly reviewed their mission. The proposed project is planned to maintain reliability in the state. The current system was built in the `80's and is coming close to capacity. VELCO is trying to prevent overloading of the three Chittendco '_'aunty transmitters. Mr. Dunn showed the location of the terminal in Queen City Park and also a plan of the proposed substation. He showed where the new transformer would be located. There would be no other changes. VELCO would move its portable transformer to the QCP substation and put it next to the existing transformer. This would be used in a "hot standby" mode and could be connected to the grid within 1-2 minutes. It would be energized if the critical electric system components were not available. There would be no concrete base, only wooden timbers. VELCO is also looking at long-term solutions, which would involve both Burlington and South Burlington. There would be a new substation at McNeil and possibly expansion of the QCP substation. The proposed work would have to be approved by the Public Service Board and the affected towns. Criteria are similar to those in Act 250. This project would be considered a minor amendment. VELCO is targeting a mid -May in-service date. The site in unmanned and there would be no additional personnel involved. The Board raised no issues. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTle1ITEL OF PLA-NI WETG & ZONET TG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 14, 2000 Marls Hill MAC #2 Holdings LLC 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed Stormwater Treatment System, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: This is to follow up on my letter to you dated 8/17/00 (copy enclosed). The timing for completing the various components of this project are critical and we need to start before winter. We need your permission to apply to the Development Review Board on your behalf. Approval is necessary to include a portion of the stormwater pond on your property and to relocate the stream as shown on the plan previously submitted to you. Authorization to proceed with obtaining the necessary local approvals does not authorize the start of construction. Construction cannot begin until all the necessary easements have been obtained. We can not discuss obtaining the easements with you until we have all state and local approvals. If you agree to give the City permission to amend your site plan to include a portion of the stormwater pond on your property and to altar the stream, please sign at the bottom of this letter and return this letter as soon as possible in the stamped self addressed envelope provided. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerer, a r y R ymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Mark Hill RJB/mcp 2 Ends #MS-01-01 FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application #MS-01-01 of the City of South Burlington to relocate a watercourse in preparation for the construction of a stormwater treatment system, 1691 Shelburne Road. On the 6"' day of February, 2001, the South Burlington Development Review Board approved the request of the City of South Burlington to relocate a watercourse under Section 3.60 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The owner of record of this property located at 1691 Shelburne Road is MAC #2 Holdings, LLC. 2. This application is to relocate a portion of a Bartlett Brook tributary around the area proposed for a constructed wetland. This wetland is part of a state of the art stormwater treatment system proposed by the City to treat runoff from Shelburne Road. The stream currently passes through the area needed for the constructed wetland. 3. Section 3.60 of the zoning regulations requires the Natural Resources Committee to review and provide comment on any application to alter or relocate a watercourse. The Natural Resources Committee reviewed the stream relocation at their 8/28/00 meeting and approved the project. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board approves application #MS-01-01 of the City of South Burlington to relocate a watercourse in preparation for the construction of a stormwater treatment system, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a five (5) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Stormwater Treatment System and Stream Corridor Restoration Bartlett Bay Road, South Burlington, VT" prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated 8/4/00, with the following stipulations: 13 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the relocated watercourse. 3. Any change to the site plan shaG ;,,quire approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. Chairman or Clerk South Burlington Development Review Board CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Numbers All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( ) Request for a conditional use ( } Request for a variance Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OAVNER OF VgQRD (Name as shown on address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Zf'P ^ Gu 2- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: J(o, I 6) TAX PARCEL ID 9 (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) D—t ' d ( � r 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use)! -PnxU NynV1Y--- c �e- b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) S& /�V-_ d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) �Z ojpq(AP' e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f�9t f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this please nose if Overlay Districts are appliclble): - 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed non -office employees) .it not specifically requested above, b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed (does not apply to residential uses) 9 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: E13 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: v� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ffDevelopment Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplete ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee d DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 22 JANUARY 2002 PAGE 3 Mr. Belair said staff had no issues with these applications. Ms. Quimby moved that the Board approve Conditional Use Application #CU-01-49 and Site Plan Application #SP-01-88 of David and Barbara Flagg subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 22 January 2002. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Conditional Use Application #CU-01-50 of Mark Hill for conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to amend a plan for an auto service and repair facility. The amendment consists of altering the access to Shelburne Road, 1691 Shelburne Road: and 8. Application #SP-01-89 of Mark Hill to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of altering access to Shelburne Road, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Belair said there were no issues with the applications. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #CU-01-50 and Application #SP-01-89 of Mark Hill subject to the stipulations in the draft motion of 22 January 2002. Mr. Boucher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The applicants for agenda item #3 arrived and that item was now heard. Mr. Fead, attorney representing JAM Golf and J. A. MacDonald reviewed the project history. He explained how MacDonald became the owner of the project and that the permits for the project had already been issued. He also noted a financial burden placed upon Mr. MacDonald. Mr. Dinklage noted that none of the considerations mentioned by Mr. Fead preclude any of the criteria in the subdivision regulations. He also reminded the applicant that the Board and the public have gone on record as having serious concerns with this plan. Mr. Marshall said that the area in question breaks up a very open area. They are proposing small pockets of development within the wooded area. They have tried to minimize impacts. One thing they have done is to eliminate ditch line from driveways. Mr. Lawrence, landscape architect, showed where they would squeeze houses between trees, and where they would specifically save some sugar maples. } 4,• DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 22 JANUARY 2002 PAGE 4 Mr. Lawrence noted there would be 2 types of homes, those with garages in front of the structure and those with garages on the side. He said that they have minimized tree cutting and would save almost all the big trees. He also showed the location for some new trees. Mr. Lawrence then showed pictures of the site from various angles and said the houses would "disappear" behind the trees. Ms. Rozek noted that the trees the applicant is talking about would block the views of the owners of the new homes and these owners might want those views and thus cut down the trees. Mr. Dinklage said if the application is approved, there would be bonding so the trees would survive. Property buyers would buy the property with trees in place. Ms. Ambusk asked what would prevent an owner from cutting them down when the developer is long gone. Mr. Fead noted that Mr. MacDonald could cut them all down today. Mr. Dinklage said there are no assurances. Mr. Rozek asked who would have the responsibility for the private driveway. Mr. Fead said the homeowners association would. Ms. Ambusk asked if there are any numbers worked up on the added expenses to the homeowners association. Mr. Dinklage said this is important but it is not germane to the Board's decision. Mr. Briggs of Countryman Environmental Planning then spoke regarding wildlife habitat on the site. He said he visited the site in November and found that it is "park -like" with squirrels, birds, and other small animals. He felt that deer may visit the site but there is no food there to sustain them and also no cover. large animals would be transient and this is not a critical habitat for them. Mr. Briggs felt the squirrels and birds would remain even with development and that if people feed the birds, their population might increase. Mr. Schmitt noted that the applicant's photo shows a significant corridor for movement of animals and the path goes right through this area. He felt the plan would further pinch a corridor for animals moving through. He noted that deer cross there and that they love open land. Mr. Boucher asked why there is no low canopy. Mr. Briggs said the applicant has cleared it. A resident of the area asked if Mr. Briggs noticed any flocks of wild turkeys. He said no. Ms. Wolf noted that before development, there was lots of wildlife. She also said that Jack Nicklaus, who sculpted the golf course, envisioned the trees there. She said people don't want to see 10 roofs. She felt the project was not good for the golf course. Another resident noted that the area had lots of wildlife until MacDonald went in and cleared the area. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 22 JANUARY 2002 PAGE 5 Mr. Jackson of Butler Farms said there used to be a lot of deer and foxes there. Now it is a "runway" for animals. He felt that with this project, even that would disappear. Mr. Dinklage noted that one of the questions the Board has to answer is whether the site is suitable for the development. He said the Board will be concerned with 3 major impacts: protection of wildlife, protection of unique natural features, and aesthetic compatibility with surrounding developed property and characteristics. Mr. Dinklage noted that the Board had heard from residents who don't want to look at 10 houses where they were told there would be trees. Mr. Fead said the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan regards open space more than woodlands and even states that homes should be allowed to encroach into wooded areas so as to preserve open space. He agreed with the concern for views and felt that placing homes in the woods preserves the view. He felt the project meets the city's concerns and does not have a "terrible aesthetic affect." He said that they have attempted to make the proposed houses harmonious with the natural landscape. Mr. Fead said that people who moved into homes earlier shouldn't object to more homes being built. Ms. Ambusk noted that the golf course property has 296 approved units. She asked how many are yet to be sold or built. Mr. Magnus said 165 units are occupied. Ms. Ambusk also said that she was offended by Mr. Fead's remarks about people who bought homes earlier shouldn't object to more homes coming. She stressed that they were specifically told there would be no development in the area in question which is why they bought their home. Mr. Cimonetti reviewed the intention of the early decisions that the city made regarding the golf course development. When the property owner came to the city with a proposal for a use that involved a golf course and a few hundred homes, he was very supportive. Homes were to be built on existing streets and the golf course would be "inside" the housing developments. The City Council suggested turning that around and nestling the houses off the streets. Mr. Cimonetti also noted that the city made a lot of accommodations for the development: tax stabilization, zoning changes, etc. The whole intent of the idea was that what you would see as you came upon this acreage was open space. He noted there have been a series of accomplishments and a series of disappoint- ments. He felt that more and more is being done to inhibit the views, especially the berms on Swift and Dorset Streets. He stressed that this was not the city's intent. The intent was to preserve views outward as well as inward, so that residents of the homes could see to the lake, to the mountains, etc. Mr. Cimonetti said taking away views outward and inward is not what was anticipated by the city and should not be allowed to continue. Mr. Dinklage added that the city has been very generous in increasing the density. He DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 22 JANUARY 2002 PAGE 6 Stressed that those increases have been within the original outlines of the project. What is being asked for now is outside of that area. Mr. Fead agreed that this is true but added that "big lots don't stay big lots forever." Ms. Rozek felt that it was not possible to put homes on the proposed lots and still have the greenery remain. Mr. Dinklage said the DRB also has concerns with the viability of trees so close to construction. He added that if he were a homeowner in a valuable house such as those being proposed, he would be concerned with trees 10 feet from his home and would certainly think of cutting them down. Mr. Boucher then moved to close the public hearing. Mr. Schmitt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will deliberate and announce its decision at a later dae. 9. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-02-01 of Barone Construction to subdivide a 1.53 acre lot into two lots of 1.02 acres and 0.51 acres, 1795 Spear Street: Mr. Barone said the lot is protected from the view from Spear St. by a tree line. In 1995, a 16 ft. gravel access road was approved. The developer would provide a 30 ft. right-of- way to the homes. The lots would have no frontage. The westerly side of the homes would be the front side. Mr. Barone showed utilities locations. All will end in the 30 ft. right-of-way. Trees will be pruned as needed to insure proper sight distances. The Board then considered the Fire Chief s request that the houses be sprinklered. Mr. Barone said it seems that the sprinklers are being required to help fight fires because the city isn't providing enough firefighters. Mr. Dinklage said that information has to be taken to the City Manager. Mr. Cameron said there is a question for him about enforcing a building code that doesn't exist. Mr. Farley noted that Fire Chief s concern with the safety of his firefighters. Mr. Cameron said that would seem to mean that every home should be sprinklered. Ms. Quimby asked about the Board's responsibility if the Chief recommends a sprinkler and the Board doesn't require it. Mr. Barone said there is also a risk if the city requires a sprinkler and it goes off when there isn't a fire and causes water damage. Mr. Kupferman said he would give weight to the opinion of the Fire Chief. Mr. Schmitt agreed and said he would follow the Chief s recommendation until he has something else to go by. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 6, 2002 Mr. Mark Hill MAC 11 Holdings, LLC 1233 Shelburne Road, #E4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan and Conditional Use Applications #SP-01-89 and CU-01-50 of Mark Hill, 1691 Shelburne Road. Dear Mr. Hill: Please find enclosed the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board approval on January 22, 2002 in regards to the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement to obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months, or this approval is null and void ( by 8/5/2002). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Stephanie A. Smith Associate Planner Certified Mail 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO January 22, 2002 MEETING Access/Circulation: The last approval required this property share access with the property to the north (1691 Shelburne Road). Such that each property would have a portion of the shared access drive on their property. This proposal is to have the access entirely on the property to the north (Oil-N-Go). The shared access drive will be 36 feet wide with an access to 1693 Shelburne Road (Autohaus) 32 feet wide. Legal documents formalizing the shared access should be required prior to a Certificate of Occupancy. Circulation on the site is adequate. Staff requests the applicant revise plans to indicate North correctly. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the zoning district is "to encourage general commercial activity." and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area effected - no adverse effect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to effect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations e) utilization of renewable energy resources- there is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare - no adverse effect expected 7) & 8) MARK IH Ls —SITE PLAIT AND CONDITIONAL APPLICATIONS, 1691 SHELBURNE ROAD This is the companion application to #5 and 96 above. This project consists of a request for permission to amend a site plan for a 3,295 square foot auto service and repair facility. The amendment consists of altering the access from Shelburne Road, 1691 Shelburne Road. This project was last reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 11, 1999 (minutes enclosed). This project located in the C2 District is bounded to the north by commercial property, on the east by Shelburne Road, on the south by the approved Autohaus, automotive repair and service, and on the west by Bartlett Brook. SITE PLAN CRITERIA The issues affecting this application are landscaping and access/circulation. iJ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO January 22, 2002 MEETING of the shared access drive on their property. This proposal is to have the access entirely on this property, which then provides access to the southern property (1693 Shelburne Road). A legal document for the revised shared access should be approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the land records prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping; Staff is concerned the access provided to 1693 Shelburne Road may require removal of plant material. The applicant should submit a landscape plan showing the change in the landscape at 1691 Shelburne Road and the relocation/removal of plant material. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA The proposed project complies with the stated purpose of the zoning district "to encourage general commercial activity." and does not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities - no effect expected b) the character of the area effected - no adverse effect is expected c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity —the proposed use is not expected to effect traffic. d) bylaws in effect- the proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations e) utilization of renewable energy resources- there is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be effected. f) general public health and welfare - no adverse effect expected 9) BARONE CONSTRUCTION—PRELEMIFNARY PLAT APPLICATION, 1795 SPEAR STREET This project consists of subdividing 1.53 acres into two lots of 1.02 acres and .51 acres, at 1795 Spear Street, north of Allen Road. Sketch plan was reviewed on December 18, 2001 (minutes enclosed). This project located at 1795 Spear Street lies within the Rl and R2 Districts. It is bounded on the north, south, and west by single family dwellings and on the east by Spear Street. Access: Access to lot #2 is by a 20 foot ROW off Spear Street with a 10 foot wide gravel drive (plan incorrectly notes 20 foot wide gravel drive), which widens to 30 feet to serve lots #3A and 93B. It widens to an 18'gravel drive in front of lot #3A then 12' gravel drive leading to 93B. Section 401.1 (k) (2) of the subdivision regulations requires all private roads be built to city standards with the exception of curbing and widths. This section does require a minimum width of 24'. This requirement is not being met. The Board may waive this section pursuant to Section 513.1 of the subdivision regulations. 9 1 /22/02 MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK HILL —SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL APPLICATIONS, 1691 SHELBURNE ROAD I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve conditional use and site plan applications #CU-01-50 and #SP-01-89 of Mark Hill requesting permission to amend a site plan for a 3295 sq. ft. auto service and repair facility. The amendment consists of altering the access to Shelburne Road, 1691 Shelburne Road., as depicted on a site plan entitled "Oil `N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Summit Engineering, Inc., dated 3/26/99, with a revised date of 12/05/01, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning (hereinafter Director). Three copies of the revised plan shall be submitted. a) Site plan shall be revised to remove "existing gravel drive," and change the owner information to reflect the current owner on the site plan. b) Site plan shall be revised to show the approved landscaping and any changes resulting from the access change. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 4) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the revised access. 5) Any change to the plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. of hrs., 672 r•vyry,,e►% oZ• Fitt wllc �t Crlrt�/' Or 4,n 3 . Fr gss U,•�� r Ft1��% L t e 2 Dovrd Or ve Essex unction, VT 05d52: J691 SnelSurne Rd., S. BurGnyrcn, V7 05203 t H o N e l 879.2707 P H O N E 951-0290 F A X f 879.2626 FA X 9S ?-0186 Z'd GLB2-098-208 S1W3W1S3AWI 77IH AHUW VC1:11 20 22 Uer y Z 1 N 'fi• tT £risling building \` 1 sure pipe. -e sleeved Gi/ ' 35 oioe j New' signs directing traffic I to each business and o Left Turn --- _' Yield s/qn lip.O New Keep 1 Left Turn Rlght sign Yield sign, ` , Exisliny^ bui/ding � - • - _ �. .. i tl � w � � � Cf •saw NT.elFl- — • .I I / hQ�C',R", C '! f d/r}% .-�-•� �r.� New Retoirlrl/ jc"it�cr . P _ �--a New Catch Bcsin QreQ �? 'rok ;:3 '8-r •'. INril! Rile = 177. © dj5ptoy % exi t n9 In v out 206. D ,'i7 1 ti: ;/•: ,�:i�n• .. (:T � li7 ... 1 ' y���1 11 etcininy wcil 1. C}ifhSlX: kin,ry .7.n1�lC - lnstoll hoy boles around new Co1C,7 basin during 1 construction ti •`�}.+•� ?' _ah ;h5 Spa 3 C•d GLSC-098-Coo GiN31,IIII103hNI '1IH AdUW Q8I:iZ 20 ZL URC PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a pub- lic hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room. 575 Dorset Street„ South Burling- ton. Vermont on Tuesday, January 22, 2002, at 7:30 PM to consider the follow- ing: 1. Application #CU- 01-49 of David & Barbara Flagg for conditional use ap- proval under Section 26.05. Conditional Uses, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to amend a plan for an auto sales facility, in- cluding service and sale of related acces- sories. The amend- ment consists of alter- ing the access to Shelburne Road., 1693 Shelburne Road. 2. Application #CU- 01-50 of Mark Hill for conditional use ap- proval under Section 26,05, Conditional' Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to amend a plan for an auto service and re- pair facility. The amendment consists of altering the access to Shelburne Road, 1691 Shelburne Road. 3. Final plat applica- tion #SD-01-70 of Acadia Realty Trust to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 98,470 sq. ft. shopping cent- er in two (2) build- ings. The amendment consists of increasing the size of the two ( 1 buildings by 2314 sq. ft. for a total of 100,784 sq. ft., 516 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board January 5, 2002 DEPARTMENT OF PI ANNG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 17, 2002 Mr. John Shearer t675 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td To: Applicants From: Stephanie Smith, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: 14 January 2002 Re: Site plan and conditional use applications SP-01-89 and CU-01-50 of Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road. Overview: Site Plan and conditional use applications of Mark Hill to amend a previously approved site plan 2533 square foot auto repair and sales building. The amendment consists of changing the location of the shared access to 1691 and 1693 Shelburne Road. Issues: 1) Staff requests an existing landscape plan for 1691 Shelburne Road. Staff is concerned there maybe changes to the approved existing landscape with the addition of the driveway to 1693 Shelburne Road. 2) Revise site plan to indicate current owner and applicant information. 3) Remove information on site plan that refers to items no longer in existence, i.e. existing gravel drive. 4) Staff would like to put the applicant on notice. There is a need to file legal documents to allow shared access as proposed. This document should be approved by the City Attorney and received prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of 1693 Shelburne Road. Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the site plan and conditional use application with the above exceptions noted. Please provide additional information by January 15, 2002. Recommendation: Staff recommends this application be authorized to proceed for site plan and conditional use consideration at the January 22, 2002 meeting. FIRE CHIEF'S COMMENTS FOR 1 /22/02 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING GATEWAY THE BUILDING SHOULD BE SPRINKLER WITH FIRE ALARMS INSTALLED MUCKLOW-CHAMBERLAIN THE FIRE SUPRESSION METHODS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH THE FIRE CHIEF (MIKE O'NEIL) CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS FOR 1 /22/2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING AutoHaus —Shelburne Road 1) Site plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing Engineers dated 3-09-01 is acceptable. 2) Shelburne Road is a State maintained road and a permit from the state is required for the work. Burlington Self Storage —Shelburne Road 1) The site plan needs a north arrow 2) Water and sewer lines under buildings shall be in concrete pipe sleeves. 3) The landscape and planting plan shall be submitted Barone Construction, Inc. Lot 3B will have a run of about 1,000 ft to a fire hydrant. This may not be acceptable to the Fire Chief. Electric and telephone service should come from an existing power pole on Spear Street and not a new pole as plan shows. The sewer system serving the four lots and the entire force main including that portion on Spear Street shall be privately maintained by the four lot owners. They shall also be responsible to locate it for Dig Safe. The construction of the sewer pumping station, water, sewer services, and driveways shall be under the supervision of Trudell Engineering of another engineer and approved in writing to the City. Gateway —Shelburne Road Revised plans dated 12-3-01 prepared by O'leary-Burke Engineers are acceptable. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 17, zooz Mr. David Flagg P.O. Box 1078 Jericho, Vermont 05465 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincer4y, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTCr.� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNgNG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 17, 2002 C. Freihofer 68 Nesti Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Ouimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staffs concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City ,Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be' placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the st:ate's construction easement. The proposed building meets',all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but''could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan implication of Mark Hill to'construct a 3295 sg ft building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont." 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1.999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- Proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b L The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/�11/99. 3. For the purpose of calcuatinq road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior li htinq shall consist of downcastina shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a 5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. o. 'rne rlanning commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to Pav the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at. the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered. 8. In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1.999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document. approved by the Cjty Attorney providing a mutual access easement. to the southerly property owner. 10. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant: to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval. is null and void.' 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the buildinQL 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms. Quimbv seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 6. Continued Public Hearings Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend' an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr.. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The 'road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr-. Dink:lage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 5 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 17, 2002 Vermont AOT 133 State Street Montpelier, Vermont o5676 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Al Ra�mond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl./td DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER 40NT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 17, 2002 MAC #z Holdings, LLC 1233 Shelburne Road, #E4 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in the Burlington Free Press. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6 or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Raymond J. Be�air Administrative Officer Encl./td CITY OF SOUTH BUFRLINGTON DTE'PAR-TNOF FIAINNLNG &:Z0Nr'4G 5' ' '5 D01319ET STREET 1-7- 30H BURLINGTON, VF-aMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802d) 846-4101 Permit NurnberSP. 61 W APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIE All information requested on this application must be completed in 111. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the iite plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board- 1) OWNER OF' RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and faxl), 2) LOCATION OF LAST RE-CORDEI) DEED (Book and page 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 0) 4) COWACT PERSOINO'Name, mailing address, phone and fax r4r) :5) PROJECT STREEET ADDRESS - TAX PARCEL TD .4 (can be obta'Ined at .assessor's Office' � -,I -L&IL) - / 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION' a-) Existing Uses on Property (including descripTion and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include descriptim and size of each, new use and e�dsting uses to remain) " " — c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and c6sbing buildings to retrain) /',, - d) Height, of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and me=anine) e) Number of resident al units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remwr,)-- f) i'4unnber ofernpicivees & company vehicies (,!vistinw and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) 1 a'; C'ther ilist any other inkr-ration peri neat 7o t s sppticarion. not specit~cally requested above, 7ieas: note I f Overlay Dismicts are appftcabie):_�_____�_� 3) LOT COVERAGE %`.. a) Building: axis€ing_% Proposed '% b') Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) EStIn.�_r°/a Proposed c) Front bard (along each street) F—�dsting_% Proposed % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Eulldi, (including mtelior renovations): S b) Landscaping: c) Other site improvements (}Tease list with cost 1.43) ES77vLkTEv lA C �j d a.) Average daily irate for entire property (in and out): a} A M. Peak hour for entire property (in and rout): c) P..iA Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 1_) PEAK LAYS OF OPERATION: 3 i "'KL lA= ?R0-TECT CONIPi:ETiON DATE: 14; SITE PIA11 AND FEE A, site plan shall 'ce submitted which shows the information listed on E.-dnibit A attached. Five (5) egalar size ccvies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the site }plan must be submitted A site plan ipplieatien Fee shah be paid to the Cit;r at the time of suornitting the site plan application (see Exhibit 1 hereby certffy that ail the informanon requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPS Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 121 161 d i RFVIEW AUTHORMI: Development Review Board L7 Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan -application and find it to be: -�fcomplete 7- Incomplete 12�jt)16 DirecTsir of Pfa—nning & Zoning or Designee 'C'!Mj SI'i E FLAN The follo;ing information met l?e shower on tl�e site piau ,lease submit five (5) copies and one educed copy (I l " ,i 17") of Lhe site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a dewy in the review before the Development Review Board., Lot drawn to scale (20 Feet scale if possible) a Survey data (distance and acreage) o Contours (existing and finished) Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as requiredin Se ion 2�5. i05 of the zoning regulations f Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants 'existing buildings, existing landscaping o Existing and proposed curb carts, pat,ernent, waikways o Zoning boundaries Number and location of parks ng spaces �;as required under Section 25.25 of the .zoning regulations) - Number ;and location of handicapped space (as required ranger section 26.253(a? of the zoning regulations) o Location of septic tanks (if applicable) c Location or any easements o Lot coverage infpx7mtion. Building footprint, total lot, and frent yard c North arrow e -Name of person. or firm preparing site plan and date a Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All hghts should be down castin g and shielded o Dempster locations (dumpsters must be screened) 0 Bicycie rack as required under Section 25.253(b) of the zoning regulations c if Restaurant is proposed, provide,/number seats and square footage .of floor area provided for patronn use but not containing fixed seats i A,_°LIC.ATTON FEE New Application $ koo* El amenament $ 15.00* * T,nciudes S I17..00 r=ording Zee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number -CL) - 5D APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( .) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) IS—yv • / 09 / � C— c7f..� e t /Sr,-/U, %G 2.> T. �- If h/1 "` J-Er ", -J a�,, I-z J sue, o�'yo� r �� L11 0 o"yL) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed % (does not apply to residential uses) 9 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) SITE PLAN A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. A4u--� SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT V�TI�1r, SIGNATURE OF PROPERTYWAR Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date 4 Location Ma Vermo, Open spots District units ,V/F Botl; ea L-� Existing tuooQ ophy wos taken rmm o piw, M+tillod "PrcpMy ai Abort S- Rita Reyes by P.C.A., dated 12168. 2.) The Preli(ninory Wet/end DeiineoNorn sas :onylettd by Wognrr, heindN & Noyes, dotes December 1997. NjF Shearer Chevrolet Paved Parking Lot Outlet 66' to rACCLMP Culvert WORM �� - c "x . oP3H AF, fi —� f J F 1 Bk! RR Sp k. ie o;6 Cutronwaao ` App—ith.te Locotion—t 1 , �, Edge of Worland By l / / ' i g Wagner, Helndel R I Shearer Chevrclet ! Drive IF it 'CO N/F 47 ,t `Lon N/F j late Of Vermont t l 1 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 nl fur) t Ore = 40 tL 4 O 4i t t Vo I," u t lL IItJ �1 ll)rl� All. i / / y Line / / — — — — Setback Line / ' fY F e Lina / / /----------s.wer in. / --0E1r1TN- 0vemeod Elec. ei. Tefevsio: = strean, -f++_I i Roilrood Trocks —Edge of Welland O Manhole a Water Volve fin Utility Pull dr hj,&wt 0 Light P.M ❑ Concrete Monumen! O Iran Pipe t n f Co.n,.aT. SuAidinow d.295 st - 0.08 ac. 2.0X Povenent: 16.499 sf - 03e W. I0.2X 142I.54 3JA 87 Green Rnra. ].to,: sf_= nr. _ Rx 10t948 sf - J.72 oc. 160X Front Yard Qo Pavement: a. 3,048 of = 0.07 ac. 26.4X ft(eensaace: t7508�= 0I9 oe, s 736X rota!: 11.556 of w a26 oc. ir.OX PEA ergo DAW z;;wA NPN SUMMIT ENOINEEFINO, INC � _ F,avv.r.• bw.,pu,x. wm«.. �..wwsp. ,..cnn.r,. KWP SO »y Dni .F.C. So. 2225 y South Burlington, VI 05401--2225 /'Y.r MAW . IA%f 1 •:40' &:.. (802) 958-55at fax (Mal 558-3629 215 Albert J. and Rita J Reyes 169J Shelbcme Road South Budington. VT 05403 Mark Hill 1233 Sl:e!burne Rood South Burlington, VI05403 LaL Zoning District: C-2 Commercial Building Use. Automobile Repair R Service S,7e: 3,295 st. 8 Semce boys. No Retail Spoc, Total Proposed Sewer User 225 GPD OVERALL SITE PLAN 04)c 3/26/S9 -- OIL 'N' bWAUGVC/VO. GO SHEET MARK HILL —OWNER I OF 4 ilia*crNO. SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 7445 Mark Hill Investments, Inc. DBA MEINEKE DISCOUNT MUFFLERS 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD *E4 - SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 860-2878 �, �, �I t d � ✓ u r� � h C I/� c h l Li r U4: Lti1Gai� .�_ °/41 �rc✓ Cc 07 r� , �h +! ) v ✓� e of S c ✓ CJ r I Ck s G V zv tit Y �� r S i t ti S C, C t C 1 4 f),LGSC C�•�"1 G t �Z a t I V� !� �7vi� 0 (�If5 NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE AUGUST 28, 2000 Ms. Powell seconded. Mr. Shaw stated that the Committee should also agree to the removal of the tree closest to the access drive. Ms. Ravin stated that the recommendation would be for the least disturbance possible within the C.O. District. The applicants should therefore, selectively cut first, and then if needed remove trees only in close consultation with staff. Unanimously approved. Ms. Ravin stated that she would draft a memo. 4. Shelburne Road Storm Water Proiect Ms. MacCallum introduced the plan. Ms. Ravin provided some of the history of the project. She stated that Jim Pease of the Agency of Natural Resources initially proposed the project to help treat stormwater runoff going into Lake Champlain. Ms. MacCallum stated that the existing stream would be relocated and the stream bank re -vegetated by the City. Ms. MacCallum stated the plans should be revised to illustrate the Conservation Open Space District. Ms. MacCallum stated that she believed the entire project was within the C.O. District. Ms. Ravin stated that the project would improve the effectiveness of the wetland. Ms. Ravin made a motion to recommend approval of the project. Mr. Shaw seconded and the Committee unanimously approved the project. 5. Pesticide Ordinance Draft Ms. Ravin asked what the process would be if the Committee voted the draft out of Committee. Ms. MacCallum stated that the City Council would then consider the ordinance. Ms. MacCallum stated that City Council would have to decide whether or not they would act on the draft. The Council could have a reading or two before a hearing or could send the draft back to the Committee. Ms. Powell was concerned that the current definitions did not include grass mixes with pesticides. Mr. Shaw suggested that "or other product" could be added to Section H B after fertilizer mixture. Ms. Powell made the motion to approve. Mr. Shaw seconded and the Committee unanimously approved the draft of the pesticide ordinance with Mr. Shaw's recommended change. Ms. Ravin made a motion to vote the draft out of Committee. Ms. Powell seconded. The motion was unanimously passed. j�Y CiLI ����}� �'i i HT' �INI)EETMEHTS TEL' j-8EL-c879- P: 0 Received ,,Cordeedrn gton Land Records of S o . Attest. N,,cx� eE OF CO VDl I )i� QF SIT . PL N APPRQ'�AL Margaret A. plcard, GItY WHEREAS, Mark Hill ("Applicant" herein) received approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission by written decision dated May 25, 1999 for: (1) constructing a 3,295 square foot building for auto service and repair on property commonly known and designated as 1691 Shelburne Road, located in the City of South Burlington. (the "Applicant's Property"), as depicted on a plan, entitled "Overall Site Plan, Oil "N Ciro Mark Hill, Owner, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Pinkharn Engineering Associates, Inc., dated March 26, 1999, last revised August 19, 1999, and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Corarnission granted said site plan approval subject to certain conditions as set forth in the final approval motion; NOW THEREFORE, the Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plan are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicant's Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor: 1. Applicant agrtes to grant to the owner of property commonly known and designated as 1693 Shelburne Road (which property is presently owned by David Flagg) an easement for access onto Applicant's Property 15 feet in width on Applicant's southerly boundary, as shown on the above -referenced plan. Said access easement shah grant to the owner of 1693 Shelburne Road the right to pass by vehicle and on foot firm 1693 Shelburne Road to Applicant's Property and across Applicant's Property by the paved travelways shown on the above -referenced plan, or subsequent modifications thereof which are approved by the Planning: Commission. Applicant agrees to construct those improvements on its property which are necessary to accommodate said access. 2, Applicant's obligation to grant an access easement as described in Paragraph 1 above shall be conditioned upon the following: P a. The owner of 1693 Shelburne Road must grant Applicant reciprocal rights of access across the 1693 Shelburne Road property. b. The owner of 1693 Shelburne Road shall improve such property necessary to accommodate said shared access and parking, as determined by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3. This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the property or any interest in the property. 4. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant's successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this 20th day of August, 1999. MAC II Holdings, L.L.C. IN THE PRESENCE OF: By: ,✓ Mar ll STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At in said County, this 20th day of August, 1999, Mark Hill, personally appeared a he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me,W Notary Nblic My Commission Expires: END OF DOCUMENT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 23, 2000 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road, E-4 South Burlington, ITT 05403 Re: Site Plan Amendment, Dumpster Relocation, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: Enclosed please find a copy of Finding of Facts of the Director of Planning and Zoning of --.- March 28, 2000. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure AC AP O 2-21YA BP 1 B-fo' CA J fB...24" L1B 1 5-B' CA J fB-24" x ro 1s-rs° RR 10 r2-15" SB 3 15-1B" SW 2 15-Ir To 24 3 -4` W 1 4-S' am LA RH hone.' A—AmchAr andenda A— WE AMC Sae wr Bae BaB Dope BaB M Bwnhp Bush »Ww 2 pa. Ar —d lb — Y p0. Rae N/F State Of Vermont GRAPHIC SCALE ( Ofrz1T r looh - R It ThAr dWpr A htndsd to meet wrkMpp CNyy of $WM BWhptn etandarol and nPdoflam and Om Enrran fd RatxUn N.f.. a1 4h..CWmY ar Ho.od AM.aurap, PROMDE r INS= So PVC Olt 3/!w A-30 PLMH S7E8 SLEEVE RECEIVED c 2 2000 MY of So. Burlington Rota. 1. Cmbvnfw *0 neNry Bp So& at f-AM-344_7733 40 hwn prW to M..fat or my oambwthr. 2. rh. VAOr a.rwntly plwr. n makhp aPonMcmt hp —t, to M. rocdny a' Bm rrw Shnfdrene Nand anfdw h 2pOr. fis Cmeruetw N to WproLole W .p?t eMh Ms Mor NOW •t M. Dbbf.t TMWwtodon Admbbbutor at 855-twa S R A. rwt d llwf oo .If. a.ss nrwrt of ho-W f. w ~ seer. nmh'fab hn ben road. and PEA W— no r..pwmblNr rw ny motwb/r or aaredYlan. d t Y wht n thnr "" A fi. Carbaotor rrac b. hws.d itr M. wont to b. prfarrmd aid & W b. p.pwsd to MnAsh . AotMoot. of hsu — S Edoth{( lopovwkY — taken Nam . ofn ontOW 74goafy of AAbert odd RNo RSYw' by PEA, dotal r2jan a The livfhehay f~ DUhootran wee oampf.tod by Bap+w, H.hd.A a Hoyar doM Decembr 10Dy. 7. Cnboctor re to h.W W —Axv onbW m..sur« pdar to Me start of —0—0. and .nW fyeo.t duty and npfat�arw, Pok - —Aia daFor .W 10, � aw rr+:w J�� Y ft4Tf 0--d p E1to 'PW of v—of a -� � ie v:d and. Nam: d o I.H. Nd FF� I hwn Mot Cow Rhy Enpd ; hc. fo W -d NFa A show cut arM 0 .1apa. w. to f d pros% pose top -A own{ nd rmdrh bl—ftt.fja Us. Arto mattbp or gWoeed .Wd n W .opr pester Mn J n f. to Sol .taanpl. a.. " how Of f-- w bey b.o d— h pl.- pdw to pl-hp ny -A if. S- SAwf f fir pfar Mg-d SUMMIT SiNQINGGRINL7, LLC e,Bmee.a, 5—. rune...., LUH.e pe — 50 Joy Onus P.O. Box 2225 South Buriington, VT 05407-2225 Bw (802) 058-5M Eax (802) e8B-3820 SITE AND GRADING PLAN �111111 EMU OIL IN' GO MARK f SHELBURNE ROAD SOL17H MAWNGTON,ri,:4 0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW RECEIVED inn All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in our application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Developmbdl'R' ref , bar> ton 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 854a-) - z5-78 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 54'O - z8`►9 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: I (09x 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) "-^ ` z- F3` w-k L-c5r- 7 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) isc>E� 5 V---. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): u g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): ;Z� u s-:►--xc-, A-tA eA--knr Fc>Q. c4-.3, c> - 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ S. zsn. "" c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): iC;C-� 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: %o - z ti'W-A 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 0 122/2000 09:01 102-860 1 M`Rk HILL INVESTMq PAGE 01 3-22--20M 9 : 23AM FROM P . , 4KHAM ENG I NEER I NG 802 658 3629 P. 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. �7 SIGNA,fURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY, ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find It to be: ClComplete ❑ InconViete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (Apfmwp) SITE PLAN APPLICATION TO BE REVIEWED BY THE SOUTH BURLINGTON DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING The following site plan application will be reviewed by the South Burlington Director of Planning and Zoning as authorized under Section 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. The Director shall issue a decision no sooner than two (2) days from the date of this notice. A decision of the Director may be appealed by an interested party to the Development Review Board within 15 days of the Director's decision. Notice of an appeal shall comply with the provisions of 24 VSA, Section 4465. 1. Site plan application of Mark Hill to amend a previously approved site plan to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of relocating the dumpster storage area. Site plan applications may be reviewed at the Planning Department offices, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 March 23, 2000 j Y� J� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OCTOBER 5, 1999 Mr. Farley moved to approve the consent agenda subject to the stipulations in the Administrative Officer's memorandum of 1 October 1999. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of Mark Hill to amend condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building be sprinklered, 1691 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Dinklage read a letter from the Fire Chief indicating that in lieu of a sprinkler, the applicant has agreed to a fire alarm system that will automatically alert the Fire Department. Members had no problem with the arrangement. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Development Review Board approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to amend condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building to be sprinklered, 1691 Shelburne Road, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. Condition #7 of the 5/11/99 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The applicant shall install a fire alarm system that will, upon activation, automatically transmit the alarm to a Central receiving station which will notify the fire department. This fire alarm system shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief." Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Application of Michael Dugan & Marie St. Amand seeking a use variance from Section 12.10 Permitted Uses, Commercial 1 District of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 4320 sq. ft. warehouse & storage facility, 46 Swift Street: 6. Site plan application of Michael Dugan & Marie St. Amand to: 1) raze a 1020 sq. ft. office building, and 2) construct a 4320 sq. ft. warehouse and storage facility, 46 Swift Street. 0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 4, 1999 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Auto Service and Repair, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on October 5, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer JW/mcp 1 Encl PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ❖ Planners ❖ Landscape Architects ❖ Surveyors TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: September 23, 1999 TO: Mr. Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer ANR Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction VT 05452 FROM: John Buermann, P.E. PROJECT NO. 7445 RE: Mark Hill, Oil'N' Go, US Route 7, SOtlth Burlington, Application #WWA-1325. PLEASE FIND ATTACHED: 2 prints, "Site & Grading Plan", Sheet 2 of 4, dated 3/26/99 and last revised 9/23/99. 2 prints, "Utility Details", Sheet 3 of 4, dated 3/26/99 and last revised 9/23/99. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Revised per the Owner's request to use a smaller water service (building is no longer to be sprinklered), and revised per Champlain Water District to specify and detail a sleeve for the water crossing of US Route 7. Please call with any questions. cc: Mark Hill Brent Desranleau Joe Weith Tom Hergenrother f.• I... 744510 92399ec. xm 50 Joy Drive 4 P.O. Box 2225 ❖ South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 •*e Fax (802) 658-3629 -* email: pinkengr@aol.com State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation September 15, 1999 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road Sout h 13urlingtdn,,VT 05403 Dear Mr. Hill: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-6563 Subject: Application #WW-4-1325, PIN EJ99-0281; Oil 'W' Go Building, U.S. Route 7, South Burlington, VT. Mark Hill WW-4-1325 September 15, 1999 Page 2 3. This office has received information related to the proposed sewer and water line construction as part of the above subject application. We shall notify you in writing upon completion of our review should we need additional information. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer c City of South Burlington Act 250 Environmental Commission #4 Water Quality Division Water Supply Division Dept. of Labor & Industry State ®f Vermont y� Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation September 29, 1999 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Hill: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Case number # WW-4-1325, New Auto Service Station located off U.S. Route 7, South Burlington, Vermont. I issued to you a letter dated September 15, 1999 authorizing the commencement of construction for the site and foundation for the building referenced above.. This letter is to re -iterate the comments stated by the City of South Burlington in their letter to you dated August 27, 1999 advising you that there is presently no reserve allocation at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility to serve your project. Please provide this office with your construction plans and the approximate date you may be in a position to occupy the building and a letter from the City of South Burlington advising their expectations to have the new wastewater treatment facility operational. Upon receipt of this information, and provided your earliest expected occupancy is after the new plant is operational, a Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit may be issued with a condition regarding no occupancy until the Agency accepts the plant as being in operation. Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions. Sin cerely, � Ehristianson Regional Engineer copies: City of South Burlington Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/IDD) STEVEN F. STITZEI FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIItM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (JMCLEAN@FIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M.EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) November 15, 1999 Carolyn Hutchinson, Clerk Vermont Environmental Court 255 North Main Street, ist Floor Barre, VT 05641 OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W.CERNOSIA RE: Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyese and Rita J. Reyese Docket No. 104-6-99 Vtec Dear Carolyn: Enclosed please find a Stipulation of Dismissal, in connection with the above, which has been executed by the parties. Please bring this to the Court's attention so that it may also be executed by Judge Wright.,, -Also, please note that the hearing scheduled for early December/Adidl. no longer be necessary. Sincerely, i ph S. McLean JSM/bj1 Enclosure cc: Jon Anderson Joe Weith BURAK&ANDERSON MELLLONI PLC COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAY SQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 RURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-07R7 ^' a62—OSOO STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT -------------------------------X IN RE: APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND Environmental Court ALBERT J. REYES AND RITA J. REYES Docket No. 104-6-99 Vtec -------------------------------X STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL The parties to the above -captioned matter hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Condition #7 of the May 11, 1999 approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission shall be revised to read as follows: "The applicant shall install a fire alarm system that will, upon activation, automatically transmit the alarm to a Central receiving station which will notify the fire department. This fire alarm system shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief." 2. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not changed by this stipulation shall remain in effect. 3. All other claims in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Dated: November I ( , 1999 Burlington, Vermont Dated: NovemberJS, 1999 South Burlington, Vermont BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC Esq. Attorneys for Mark Hill, Albert J. Reyes, and Rita J. Reyes UTH BURLINGTON Joso S. McLean, Esq. S 'tzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 SO ORDERED this day of , 1999. Judge Vermont Environmental Court SAClient Matters\7186]\Legal\stipulationofdismissal.doc RECYCLED PAPER �W-, Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation July 8, 1999 Jeremy Farkas Burak, Anderson & Mellon, PLC P.O. Box 787 Burlington, VT 05402-078.7 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Dear Jeremy: Subject: Albert J. & Rita J. Reyes, 1691 Shelburne Road - Acquisition Under Threat of Condemnation, located off Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. This letter is to confirm our recent telephone conversation regarding the subdivision of a parcel of land located at 1691 Shelburne Road. The subdivision occurred as a result of the Agency of Transportation acquiring land under the threat of condemnation for the purpose of highway construction. In accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules, Subchapter 1-302(C)(3) which states "a subdivision which is created by State or municipal condemnation for highway or utility construction, shall not require a permit." 'Additionally, we have recognized that land acquired under threat of condemnation will be handled the same as if the land was acquired by the act of condemnation. Therefore, based on the information you provided me, it is my opinion no State Subdivision Permit is needed for this conveyance of land. Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer copies: City of South Burlington CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 27, 1999 Mark Hill MAC II Holdings, LLC 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Additional Sewer Allocation, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington approves 245 gpd of additional sewer allocation for your property at 1691 Shelburne Road to accommodate a floor drain which will be connected to the sanitary sewer system. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation is on a waiting list until such time as capacity is available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerer Ra mond . BeiairI Administrative Officer RJB/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 5, 1999 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan Amendment, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: Enclosed is a copy of the October 5, 1999 Development Review minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 1, 1999 Mark Hill 1233 Shelburne Road, E-4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Amend Condition #7, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and my comments to the Board. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 5, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, RaymonJ. Bela r, (; Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 1999 Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Agency of Natural Resources 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: WW-4-1325, Mark Hill Dear Mr. Christianson- 1 have been asked to update you on the status of the expansion of the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. It is the City's expectation that the expansion to the plant will be substantially completed by the end of October, 1999. This completion date could be delayed due to unforseen circumstances. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. i rely, Joe eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing Tddress, phone and fax #) ?"-Leif 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) .50 kk 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: / 9/ 6 �t V Q I k 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) A) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) ,h b) Proposed remain) A o (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to c) Total building square footage(proposedbuildings and existing buildings to remain) .) S l/ l 1 d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) . e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed).- g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): f P it kAgit� 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed % 5 e e b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ b) Landscaping: $ ' a o c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): /r' 9 b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �� �n — z 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: C' 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: l 1 I I e, 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIG ATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line / I,DATE OF SUBMISSION: ' - It I REVIEW AUTHORITY: El Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and rind it to be: (Apfrmsp) 11 Director, Planning & Zoning Complete Incomplete e r f Planning & Zoning or Designee Date EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five ) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the followi94 information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) ` • Number and location of handioanned spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) / • Location of septic tanks (if applicable • Location of any easements / • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm reparin ' site plan and date p p • Exterior lighting details (must b down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters,'must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required unde Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but nibt containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE New Application $ 60.00* Amendment $ 35:00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) sour r 0* South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-4110 Fax:802-846-4125 VT MEMO To: Ray Belair From: Michael E. O'Neil Date: 09/28/99 Subject: Oil and Go Ray, I met with Mark Hill of Oil and Go and discussed the proposed project and given the amount of expense and work required to sprinkler the project, as well as the small number of patrons in the building at one time, we came to a compromise that I feel best meets our needs. In lieu of the sprinkler system, Mr. Hill has agreed to a fire alarm system that will, upon activation, automatically transmit the alarm to a central receiving station which will notify the fire department. I feel that.,in this instance, this is a fair compromise. I would be happy to meet with the board at a future date to discuss this issue or any other Fire Protection issue. 10/5/99 MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK HILL I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to amend condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building to be sprinklered, 1691 Shelburne Road, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Condition #7 of the 5/11/99 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The applicant shall install a fire alarm system that will, upon activation, automatically transmit the alarm to a Central receiving station which will notify the fire department. This fire alarm system shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief." Memorandum - Development Review Board October 5, 1999 Administrative Officer prior to the use of the general office space. 4) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the Development Review Board. 4) MARK HILL - AMEND CONDITION - SITE PLAN This application consists of amending condition #7 of an approval granted on 5/11/99 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of amending condition #7 which requires the building be to sprinklered. The Fire Chief has agreed to change his recommendation and recommend a fire alarm and monitoring system (see enclosed) in/stead of the sprinklers. 5 & 6) MICHAEL DUGAN - WAREHOUSE BUILDING - VARIANCE & SITE PLAN This project consist of: 1) razing a 1020 square foot office building, and 2) construct a 4320 square foot warehouse building on a lot developed with 18,000 square feet of warehouse space in five (5) buildings. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 4/25/83 granted a use variance for the existing warehouse buildings. This property located at 46 Swift Street lies within the C1 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the north by the I-189 on ramp, on the south by Swift Street, on the west by a residence and office building, and on the east by a residence and the correctional facility. Variance criteria: There are no unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity narrowness or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topography or other physical condition peculiar to the particular property. The unnecessary hardship is due to the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. The request is for a use which 4 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staff's concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4 All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5 Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6 The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation _granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered. 8 In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this Property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney providing a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS ORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-1507 (802)660-2555 (VOICE 'TDD) STEVEN F. STIT7_EL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATT1 R_ PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM'_555aFIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE a F1RMSPF COM) JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ("ALSO ADMITTED INN.)'.) August 20, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert Perry, Esq. Perry, Schmucker & Goldsborough, PLLC PO Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05407-2323 Re: Oil N Go - Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Bob: OF COUNSEL ARTHU'R W CERNOSI.A Ray Belair notified me that he received a revised plan for the above -captioned project. The last revision date of the plan is August 19, 1999. Please insert this last revision date in the Notice of Condition of Site Plan Approval. Thank you. Sincerel Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure cc: Raymond J. Belair son569.ccr CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 24, 1999 Mark Hill MAC II Holdings, LLC 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Sewer Allocation, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Hill: This is to inform you that the South Burlington Planning Commiion at their May 11, 1999 meeting approved a 125 gpd sewer allocation for your proposed auto service and repair building at 1691 Shelburne Road. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation is on a waiting list until such time as capacity is available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe VbYth, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE,'TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-M.AIL(FIRM2555TiFIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E- FLETCHER WRITERS E-MAIL (TEUSTACE'r FIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPHS.MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE OALSO ADMITTED IN \ Y ) August 19, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert Perry, Esq. Perry, Schmucker & Goldsborough, PLLC PO Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05407-2323 Re: Oil N Go - Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Bob: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Ray Belair faxed me a copy of the Notice of Condition of Site Plan Approval executed by Mark Hill on August 19, 1999. Please note that the following changes are necessary before the Notice of Condition can be recorded: 1. The date of the Planning Commission's Written Decision is May 25, 1999 (see copy attached); and 2. The last revision date of the plan is July 9, 1999. With these minor changes, the Notice of Condition will be ready to record in the South Burlington Land Records. Please send the executed original to Ray Belair at the City offices. Thank you. Si I ncer-el-y, 1 P . Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure cc: Raymond J. Belair # S P-99-11 FiNDI G OF FACT &DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re' Findings of Fact, of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road. On the 11 u day of May, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of Mark Hill for site plan review under Section 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of constructing a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair. The Commission approved a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility on 7/26/94 on this lot which was never constructed. The ZBA on 4/26/99 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the proposed use. 2. The owners of record of this particular property arc Albert & Rita Reyes. 3. This property located at 1691 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District and the Conservation & Open Space District. It is bounded on the north by an auto dealership, on the east by Shelburne Road, on the south by two (2) residences, and on the west by the railroad. 4. Access/circulation- The applicant is proposing a 36 foot curb cut, 20 feet to the north of the south boundary. Staff recommended that the curb cut be moved 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. This would allow for a shared curb cut with the property to the south. Staff recommended a condition that requires the applicant to reduce the size of his curb cut when the property owner to the south constructs his curb and to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 36 feet. The condition should include a provision requiring the applicant to provide a mutual access easement to southerly property owner. The VT AOT has also recommended one shared curb cut for the two parcels. Circulation on the site is adequate. 5. Coverage setbacks: Building coverage is 2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). front yard coverage is 27.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. 6. Parking: A total of 16 spaces are required and 15 spaces are provided including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack. Parking proposed is one (1) space or 6.3% short of the requirement. Applicant should revise the plan to add one (1) additional parking space. 7. UndscapinQ: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $5250 which is being met. Proposed plantings include Serviceberry, Maple, Birch, Dogwood, Burning Bush, Juniper, Spirea, Arborvitae and Viburnum. 8. C.O, District: A portion of the property which lies along two (2) drainageways is within the C.O. District. The proposed development will not encroach into this C.O. District. 9. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District (BBW): This property lies within the BBW District. The applicant provided Heindel and Noyes the information needed to include the development in the City's hydrology computer model. The plan includes the stormwater detention basin required by the model. 10. $ewer: The sewer allocation requested is 125 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting lit until such time as capacity is available. Staff recommended a condition that a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance not be issued and the building not being used until the sewer capacity is available. l 1. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 182 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed use will generate 51.36 vte's. The applicant was made aware that the road impact fee is approximately S1 1,500. 12. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. l 3..Li : Exterior lighting will consist of the following: — six (6) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, South Burlington Planning Commission approves the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Overall Site Plan Oil'N' Go Mark Hill - Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21 /99, with the following stipulations: 1) 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning, Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut approximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one (1) additional parkins space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments 41.41 the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4) All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6) The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building can not be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7) The building shall be sprinklered. 8) In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney providing a mutual access casement to the southerly property owner. 10) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 11) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the building. 12) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Chairman or Cler South Burlington Planning Commission Date AUG-19-1999 THU 04'118 PM ST7TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 8026Fn?552 P. 02/06 ST1'1'ZE.1., PAGE & FLETUIER, P.C. .ATTORNEYS A FLAW 171 BA '1'IiTZY P.O, Box 1507 BURI TNUON, VERMONT 05402.1507 (402)660-2555 SMVEN F. STIT!'EL I'AX (SQ) 6 0-2552 PATAI R. RV."Ir E-M.AIL(FIRM2555 rFIttMM117,CONI) ROBERT & F LKO U-It AIRI ll IVIi MA1L (ILUSTACE(oF1PVSPF.COM) JUK?f i S. MCLEAN TIM01I I Y M. WSTAU (•ALRQ ADM! 1 1'J) IN N Y August 19, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert perry, Esq. Perry, 5chmucker & Goldsborough, PLLC PO Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05407-2323 Re: Oil N Go - Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Bob: CA; CO'-1NNEI AR'111UR W. CFAW)SIA Ray Belair faxed me a cepy of the Notice of Condition. of Site Plan Approval executed by Mark Hill on August 19, 1999. Please note that the following changes are necessary before the I3otice of Condition can be recorded: 1. The date of the Planning Commission's Written Decision is May 25, 1999 (see copy attached); and 2. The last revision date of the plan is July 9, 1999. With these minor changes, the Notice of Condition will be ready to record in the South Burlington Land Records, Please send the executed original to Ray Belair at the City offices. Thank you, Sinc�xe3�, Timothy M. tustace 7 Bijp Fnolosure cc: Raymond J. Belair acn568.ccx AJG-10-1999 THU Uri 19 PM ST?TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 802'03P02552 1 P. 03106 FPCM : Ct .9 cf So. E FA'� t40, ; 1 802 65e 474a Aug. 19 _3 y p1 6Fh1 P1 4s p-99-1 I DIFCISION STATE OF VER,'WIONT COUNTY OF CHIT'T,ENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re, Findings of Feet, of Marts Hill to construct a 3295 square Foot building for auto serwe:.c and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, On the 11a day of May, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission apprmwed the Mque:at of MVk Kill for She plan review under Soction 26.10 o£the South Buz lington Zoning Reegul moons bared on 6e following findings: This project consists of constructing a 3295 square foot building for auto Service and repair, The Commission approved a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility on 7/26,194 on this lot ,►Rich was never constructed, The Z.BA on 4126199 gra tod the applicant a c nditionai use permit for the proposed usc_ 2. The owrws of record of this particular property are Albert & Rita Reyes, 3, This property located at 1691 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, the Bartlett Break Watershed Protection Overlay District and the Conservation & Open Space District, It is bounded on the north by an auto dealership, on the east by Shelburne Road, on the South by two (2) residen"s, and on the west by the railroad. a, A&gl�al�ttion! 111e applicant is proposing a 36 foot curb cut, act fcct to the north of the south boundary. 5tsf"recornmended that the curb cut be moved 20 fbet to the south to abut the south boundary. This would allow for a shared curb out with the property to the south. Staff recorrt etded a condition that requires the: sppiicant to reduct the sire of his curb Cut when the property owner to the south constructs his curb and to Mate a shared curb cut with a rnaxirnum width of 36 feet. The condition should include a provision requiring the applicant to provide a mutual accem easement to southerly property owner. The VT AOT has also roc-ornmended one shared curb cut for the two Parcels. Circulation on the site is adequate. 5. Cowg4a friet6apks: Building coverage is 7% (m=rnurn allowed is 30%), Overall eoveM.Sc is 122.2% (am"mum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage N 27.3% (maximurn allowed is 30910), Setback requirements .arc met, A®at4t• Fix Notm 7671 ®�w g► 7q1 oa,rprt�r co- Whoft T WI& y ---- AUG-19-1999 T HU 0419 PIS ST I TZ EL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 8026PO 1552 P. 04/06 • WRGM : Citg or So. g Fax NO. : 1 W2 658 4748 Aug. 19 1999 01:1?mil P2 6. Pukilaw A total or 16 spaces are required and 15 spaces are provided including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack_ Parking proposed is one (1) space or 6.3% short of the requirement, Applicant should revise the plan to add one (1) additional parking space. 7. Lnndscagiti The rumimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $5250 which is being meet, Proposed plantings include Serviceberry, Maple, Birch, .Dogwood, Burning Bash, Juniper, Spires, Arborvitae and Viburnum. 8. C.Q--j i�C�S , A portion Oftht propsrty which ties along two (2) drainagewaya is within the C.0, District. The proposed development will not encroach into this C.0, District. 9. tt Brook Wateroied P.rmtedion0verlav District fBBW) This property foes withiflthe 13BW Distract. The applicant provided Heindel and Noyes the information needed to Include the development in the City's hydrology computer model. The plan includes the stormwater detention basin required by the model, 10. jgwer; The sewer 41100tion requestod is 125 pd. 'Tito applicant will be required to pay the pei gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There i g Currently no te*tve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting it until such time as capacity is available. Staff recommended a condition that a t;ertiticatc of Occupancy/Compliance not be issued and the building not being used until the sewer capacity is availablc. 11. Imffic This property is located in Traffic. Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to ge=jrate a nwimum of 182 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.,N,4, peak hour. 11-E estimates that the proposed use will generate 51.36 vte's. The applicant was made aware that the; road impact fee is approximately $11,500, 12. um er: A scre&*d durnp!Ft-,r ataxage aroa is provided 13. UgWnwt Exterior lighting will consist of the following; six (6) 17S watt MOW halidt leinps mounted on the building with downeasting shielded fixtures.. Band on the above Findings of Fact, South Burlington Planning Commission approves the site playa application of Mark Mill to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one (1) cr.ntitled, "Overall site plan OWN' 00 Marie l NO - Omiar Shd&,,a' w Rvad Subtly Burlington. Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4(21 /99, with the following stipulativhS; P.'JG-19-1999 7HU 04:20 PM STrTZE' 1 PAGE F1ETNER PC FAX N0, �30 0F'��55 l P. 05/06 FRGM ; City of S:. 3 FAX NO. ' 1 892 GSB 4,48 Aug, 19 299? 0i'.18pM F-' 1) All previotas approvals and stipulations which are not superse4ed by this a.pprowal shall remain in effect. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Directof Of Planning & Zoning. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to more the curb cut approximately 20 feet to the south to abut the South boundary. b) The site plan shall be revisers to add one (1) additional parking space, c) The plan shall be revised to address comments 41 4 in tine VAOT's letter dated 5/1119a, 3) For the purpose Ofcalculatirls road impact fees under the South Surlini:ton Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Cotmrnis,sion estimates that the. auto service and repair banding will generate 51,36 vehicle trip ends duriz the P,M, peak hcxnr. 4) AU extertlor lighting shell consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior co installation_ 5) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The boxed shall remain in effect for three (3) Years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. b) Tho Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required, to pay the per gallon Fei7 prior to permit issuance_ Thorc is currently no sewer allocation availeblen at the Bartlett Say Wastewater Tretatmertt Facility. The allowtion gratated shall be placed an a waiting list until such time as the. allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/C'ompliamce will be issued and the building can not be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7) The building shell be spriiWered, 8) In order to promote safe access along this hitch volume roadway, the COmmissipn shall require this Property and the propWy to the south to be smed by one shared curb -coat to Shertbume Road. 'Phis shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the prop" to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time thus shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient Amount to create: a .shared curb cut wi6 a nmrdmum width of 30 fcct. 9) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City AUG-19-1999 7HU 04:20 PM STTT EL PACE FLETCHER PC, FAX NO, 8028PI'0552 P. 06/06 FROM City cyr So. iR FPX NO. : 1 802 658 4748 any. 1,,, 1999 0i:1.8Pj PiA. Attorney W-viding 4 mutual accoss casement to the $0u,herly propmy owner 10) The applicant Shall obtain a totting permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27-302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 11) The applicant "I obtain a CeltificAte Of Occupancy/Compliance from the Admirdstrative Offic*r prior to the use of the building, ") Any chm$c to the site P194 MWI mQuirA approval by the South Rupfino,51� coniunisslon, Chairman or cl South Burlington Planning Commission -I- ---2Z4D�ate 4 AUG-20-1999 FRI 08:57 AM ST'TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 802'OP00552 P, 02 STITZr I., PAGE. & FLFTCHER, P.C. Al )"O 2NEYS A7' [,,,*W 171 11A'1'TE1LY S'CRFCT F.O. BOX 1,107 bt'RL1NG`tON, VFAMI ONT0-54O2-15,7 S-1EVEN F S".T)7rt. (80_0MO-2555(VO)Crel x1) PATlk PAGE, FAX (80_) W-2552 E-MAIt{V11W2555[+�FIKMspf,COM) HOUL•RTE H.1l:tC:11L-.R WAIL,-VSE•MAIL(I'll1191ACE(7,Ffitb1.SiYC' m) .Iwu y1 E S. M, ;.t'AN l'T O t't;Y M. CUSTHCN (,At,xn l.i)mi rrCU IN N V , August 20, 1999 m ,FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert Perry, Esq. Perry, Schmucker& Goldsborough, ,PLLC Pe Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05407-2323 Re: Oil N Go - Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road Dcar Bob: OF COUN' i 1. AP1W;1: W CrRNOSCn Ray Belair notified me that he received a revised plan for the above --captioned project. The last revision date of the plan is August 19, 1999. Please insert this last revision date in the Notice of Condition of site Plan Approval. Thank you. Sincere Timothy M. Fustace THE/jp tnclosure cc: Raymond J. Belair aon,CP.cor NOTICE OF CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, Mark Hill ("Applicant" herein) received approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission by written decision dated May 11, 1999 for: (1) constructing a 3,295 square foot building for auto service and repair on property commonly known and designated as 1691 Shelburne Road, located in the City of South Burlington (the "Applicant's Property"), as depicted on a plan, entitled "Overall Site Plan, Oil `N Go Mark Hill, Owner, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated March 26, 1999, last revised March 26, 1999; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted said site plan approval subject to certain conditions as set forth in the final approval motion; NOW THEREFORE the Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plan are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicant's Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor: 1. Applicant agrees to grant to the owner of property commonly known and designated as 1693 Shelburne Road (which property is presently owned by David Flagg) an easement for access onto Applicant's Property 15 feet in width on Applicant's southerly boundary, as shown on the above -referenced plan. Said access easement shall grant to the owner of 1693 Shelburne Road the right to pass by vehicle and on foot from 1693 Shelburne Road to Applicant's Property and across Applicant's Property by the paved travelways shown on the above -referenced plan, or subsequent modifications thereof which are approved by the Planning Commission. Applicant agrees to construct those improvements on its property which are necessary to accommodate said access. 2. Applicant's obligation to grant an access easement as described in Paragraph 1 above shall be conditioned upon the following: a. The owner of 1693 Shelburne Road must grant Applicant reciprocal rights of access across the 1693 Shelburne Road property. b. The owner of 1693 Shelburne Road shall improve such property necessary to accommodate said shared access and parking, as determined by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3, This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the property or any interest in the property. 4. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant's successors and assigns. Dated as South Burlington, Vermont, this l'9th day of August, 1999. MAC Il Holdings, L.L.C. IN THE PRESENCE OF: r By: Mar ill STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. \C�, At \ in said County, this Uth day of August, 1999, Mark Hill, personally appeared an he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary u lic My Commission Expires: o �NSPOR�P� STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 May 11, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE : Shelburne - South Burlington FEGC 019-4(19) Proposed Oil & Go Development Dear Joe: We have reviewed the proposed Oil & Go Development as it relates to the Agency's Shelburne - South Burlington project (Shelburne Road). To their credit, Pinkham Engineering has been in touch with this office and our Utilities Division. Some issues which I would like to bring to your attention follow: 1. We have discussed that this parcel and the one to the south, if developed, should share the same access. Does the consultant's design accomplish this with respect to the drainage swale at the south edge of the property? As discussed, we will speak with Green Mountain Power regarding the future plans for the overhead Utility lines. 2. The drive seems a bit wide at its proposed width. Vehicles which would most likely use the access would tend to be passenger cars and pickup trucks. Are there any standards which you follow for driveway width with respect to development? 3. Two proposed trees will conflict with our future drainage plans. They are the two trees approximately 40 feet and 60 feet north of the proposed drive, about 8 feet off the proposed right-of-way. No trees should be placed within our limits of construction. 4. The proposed front edge of the parking area is 23 feet from the proposed ROW. Our construction limits for the drainage (north of the proposed drive) are up to 27 feet from the proposed ROW. Therefore, there is a 4 foot encroachment of the proposed parking lot into our drainage construction limits. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 5. Thought should be given to saving the existing 12 inch apple tree, just north of the existing house. If you have questions, please call me at 651-1744. Sincerely, G� Eric G. Fontana, P.E. Project Engineer EG F: efVso_bu rl/oil&go.599] cc: Project File via EGF/RJR Central Files via MWLawson (DLandry Acting) Don Allen, Utilities 05/1111939 14:59 80286577:-)8 SPEC PPC,;; BURLINGTnN PAGE 02 STATE OF VERMON7 AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 May 11, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE : Shelburne - South Burlington FEGC 019-4(19) Proposed Oil & Go Development Dear Joe: We have reviewed the proposed Oil & Go Development as it relates to the Agency's Shelburne - South Burlington project (Shelburne Road). To their credit, Pinkham Engineering has been in touch with this office and our Utilities Division. Some issues which I would like to bring to your attention follow: 1. We have discussed that this parcel and the one to the south, if developed, should share the same access. Does the consultant's design accomplish this with respect to the drainage swale at the south edge of the property? As discussed, we will speak with Green Mountain Power regarding the future plans for the overhead Utility lines. 2. The drive seems a bit wide at its proposed width. Vehicles which would most likely use the access would tend to be passenger cars and pickup trucks. Are there any standards whiigh you follow for driveway width with respflct to dPvPlnpment? 3. Two proposed trees will conflict with our future drainage plans. They are the two trees approximately 40 feet and 60 feet north of the proposed drive, about 8 feet off the proposed right-of-way. No trees should be placed within our limits of construction. 4, Thq Rr cased front %dge of the marking area is ?I feet fmm the proposed ROW. Our construction limits for the drainage (north of the proposed drive) are up to 27 feet from the proposed ROW. Therefore, there is a 4 foot encroachment of the proposed parking lot into our drainage construction limits. Yeleeommunkatloab item' S4r•kQ 1.1"253.0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 05/11/1939 14:58 8028657768 SPEC PROD BURLINGTON PAtaE 03 5. Thought should be given to saving the existing 12 inch apple tree, just north of the existing house. If you have questions, please calf me at 651-1744. Sincerely, Eric G. Fontana, P.E. Project Engineer EGF:eAJso_burl/oi1$go.599] cc: Project He vla EGF/RJR Central Files via MWLawson (DLandry Acting) Don Allen, Utilities 05/11/1939 14:58 8028657738 SPEC PRO 3URLINuTr-IN STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5D01 May 11, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE : Shelburne - South Burlington FEGC 019-4(19) Proposed Oil & Go Development Dear Joe: PAS 02 We have reviewed the proposed Oil & Go Development as it relates to the Agency's Shelbume - South Burlington project (Shelburne Road). To their credit, Pinkham Engineering has been in touch with this office and our Utilities Division. Some issues which I would like to bring to your attention follow; 1. We have discussed that this parcel and the one to the south, if developed, should share the same access. Does the consultant's design accomplish this with respect to the drainage swale at the south edge of the property? As discussed, we will speak with Green Mountain Power regarding the future plans for the overhead Utility lines. 2. The drive seems a bit wide at its proposed width. Vehicles which would most likely use the access would tend to be passenger cars and pickup trucks. Are there any standards which you follow for driveway width with respfict to dPvPlnpment? 3. Two proposed trees will conflict with our future drainage plans. They are the two trees approximately 40 feet and 60 feet north of the proposed drive, about 8 feet off the proposed right-of-way. No trees should be placed within our limits of construction. 4, Thq mpwW front edge of the parking area IS 21 fPPt from the proposed ROW. Our construction limits for the drainage (north of the proposed drive) are up to 27 feet from the proposed ROW. Therefore, there is a 4 foot encroachment of the proposed parking lot into our drainage construction limits. 'telecommunications Relay Sor•ko I.8 O-M-Digs Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 05/11/1999 1d:58 8028657768 SPEC PRUJ BURLINGTON PAGE 03 4 5. Thought should be given to saving the existing 12 inch apple tree, just north of the existing house. If you have questions, please call me at 651-1744. Sincerely, Eric G. Fontana, P.E. Project Engineer EG F:egJso_bu ri/oiI&go. 599] cc: Project File via EGF/RJR Central Files via MWLawson (DLandry Acting) Don Allen, Utilities 05/11/1339 14:53 It 80286577SS SPEC PRO,: :3UP,LING7r1N STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05533-5001 May 11, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE : Shelburne - South Burlington FEGC 019-4(19) Proposed Oil & Go Development Dear Joe: PAS 02 We have reviewed the proposed Oil & Go Development as it relates to the Agency's Shelburne - South Burlington project (Shelburne Road). To their credit, Pinkham Engineering has been in touch with this office and our Utilities Division. Some issues which I would like to bring to your attention follow: 1. We have discussed that this parcel and the one to the south, if developed, should share the same access. Does the consultant's design accomplish this with respect to the drainage swale at the south edge of the property? As discussed, we will speak with Green Mountain Power regarding the future plans for the overhead Utility lines. 2. The drive seems a bit wide at its proposed width. Vehicles which would most likely use the access would tend to be passenger cars and pickup trucks. Are there any standards which you follow for driveway width with re,spflrt to dPvPlnpment? 3. Two proposed trees will coMict with our future drainage plans. They are the two trees approximately 40 feet and 60 feet north of the proposed drive, about 8 feet off the proposed right-of-way. No trees should be placed within our limits of construction. 4, ThQ Rr4po8od front "go of the parking area is 23 fnnt from the proposed ROW. Our construction limits for the drainage (north of the proposed drive) are up to 27 feet from the proposed ROW. Therefore, there is a 4 foot encroachment of the proposed parking lot into our drainage construction limits. Teleeomtnunkabont Relay S4r•ko 1-8"253-0191 Vermont Is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 05/11/1999 14:58 8028657768 SPEC PRQJ 3URLINGTON PAGE 03 5. Thought should be given to saving the existing 12 Inch apple tree, just north of the existing house. If you have questions, please calf me at 651-1744. Sincerely, Eric G. Fontana, P.E. Project Engineer EGF:eg1so_burl/oiI&9o.599j cc: Project File via EGF/RJR Central Files via MWLawson (DLandry Acting) Don Alen, Utilities JJN-21-1999 MON 02�09 PM ST'TZEL PACE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 802"- 1552 o,3 21%99 11:411 at h2B176 B A & 11 PLC P, 02 IQ,�OOZ/qq8 /�/ BumKeMDERSON MELLONI ri,c (lounaellors at La« - Mr, loe Wsith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: A101WO L. Flansk, GtItimay Squurc - 30 Main t'JGrcat Jon Andtn,ma roc[ oltuts: Bo.. 787 lIMmIc R_ MICI)nl` BurUngum. eerMAZ 0*32-07H7 Brian J. 6uIvan r Phone: SUZ W-050V ruuber, L Gauss Ft�r 501862.8176 L'uni;l:\. 5t.�tY"r e-mslil; nisorrsc+��7l0ss'1•s`vtt^ �— rt „��'�C4sn•7 -a ilm ;jjuttuul 8. Raercasb¢t'x' Of C(r Urly-i �S ntsswliar sltYlcu ' U'Jl :YlttussYQ I,1 tt" VA. 5e:i(c ;isrvvs jll#;tp C�{Vf. }Tn Ertl U$W! T.LLrt atirniUu+l in li{idieiY 42 334,040 R�IiN�+MlmirtMl In \L.�hu.accr ratLnii(od In N'" 1"orlr WIN ndmlmd In %Irginln xnJ slw lhwalut tdCulwinbla June 15, 1999 • la . • I1 - Vms. On June 10, 1999 Mark Hill and Albert and Rita Reyes filed a limited appeal of the Planning Commission's May 11, 1999 approval for the above -referenced project. Thhis letter describes the narrow basis for this appeal and requests the City of South Burlington to starch with us for a Creative way to resolve our limited disagreement. We believe that both Mark Hill and the City of South Burlington arc satisfied with their interaction throughout the Oil W Go permitting process. Nevertheless, on the night at which that project was finally approved by the Planning Commission, there appeared a Condition 7 of which Mr. HUI was not previously aware: Condition 7 requires Mr. Hill to sprinkler his proposed 3,295-square-foot building. No other authority is requiring Mr. Hill's building to be sprinklered. Thus, Condition 7 represents an entirely new project cost. Our best information is that the cost will be $25,00.0 or about 10'io of the building's estimated cost,��- Moreover, the rationale for sprinklering the building is unclear, 0i'ven the nature of Mr, WIN proposed business -- changing oil -- fires at the building are more likely to involve oil. Water spreads rather than extinguishes oil fires. Furthermore, it is unclear that key players in South Burlington have fully disoussed the implications of a sprinkler requirement, especially in this situation. South Burlington is usually p i���; �{,� {jai �t• ,.,mot lair. �54 JUN-21-1999 MON 0210 PM STITZEL PRGE FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 802:- 1552 06/21/99 11,43 'a: 928176 B A & X, PLC r 1I00:ious BUS. XNDFMON & MELLONI W MY, Joe WTeith June 15, 1999 Page 2 business friendly. Wo question whether it would adopt building standards malting construction substantially more axptngive in South Burlington than elsewhere, Rather, it seems more likely that Condition 7 appeared in the approval documents because the Statc of vauziont requires many commercial projects to be sprinklared anyway. South Burlington wants the condition as a matter of course so that it can assert jurisdiction As well ns the State over the sprinkler installation, For these reasons, we ask you to review and explain both the legal and poliq support for South Burlington to require sprinklering for buildings in South Burlington not otherwise required to be sprinklered, 4n the other hand, if the City of Suuth Burlington does not intend to rendition Project approval on sprinkleritig buildings not otherwise required to be sprinklered, we ask you to join with us to devise a plan for removing this condition. This plan could include a motion to reconsider before the South Burlington Planning Commission or an Environmental Court stipulation removing Condition 7. JTN41w Very truly yours, )on An erson 9' Ciitot M&W_g1863V4*—Ijaa WARh.doa A IV ~� — '1g'e-i7 U, er- BURAK , UDEMON MELLONI I'LC Counsellors at Law Mr. Joe Weith City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael L. Burak° Jon Anderson Thomas R. Mellon" Brian J. Sullivant Robert I. Goetz* Daniel A. Seff"t Michael B. Rosenberg Of Counsel "Also admitted in New York tAlso admitted in Illinois *Also admitted in Massachusetts 'tAdmitted in New York Only *Also admitted in Virginia and the District of Columbia June 15, 1999 Re: In Re: Oil 'N' Go, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Weith: Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402.0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fhx 802 862-8176 e-mail: attorneyCa vtlawl.com www.vtlawl.com Montpelier Office! 74 East State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05602 802 229-0466 On June 10, 1999 Mark Hill and Albert and Rita Reyes filed a limited appeal of the Planning Commission's May 11, 1999 approval for the above -referenced project. This letter describes the narrow basis for this appeal and requests the City of South Burlington to search with us for a creative way to resolve our limited disagreement. We believe that both Mark Hill and the City of South Burlington are satisfied with their interaction throughout the Oil 'N' Go permitting process. Nevertheless, on the night at which that project was finally approved by the Planning Commission, there appeared a Condition 7 of which Mr. Hill was not previously aware. Condition 7 requires Mr. Hill to sprinkler his proposed 3,295-square-foot building. No other authority is requiring Mr. Hill's building to be sprinklered. Thus, Condition 7 represents an entirely new project cost. Our best information is that the cost will be $25,000 or about 10% of the building's estimated cost. Moreover, the rationale for sprinklering the building is unclear. Given the nature of Mr. Hill's proposed business -- changing oil -- fires at the building are more likely to involve oil. Water spreads rather than extinguishes oil fires. Furthermore, it is unclear that key players in South Burlington have fully discussed the implications of a sprinkler requirement, especially in this situation. South Burlington is usually Rceycicd Paper Mr. Joe Weith June 15, 1999 Page 2 BURAK ANDERSON &' MELLONI ,%, business friendly. We question whether it would adopt building standards making construction substantially more expensive in South Burlington than elsewhere. Rather, it seems more likely that Condition 7 appeared in the approval documents because the State of Vermont requires many commercial projects to be sprinklered anyway. South Burlington wants the condition as a matter of course so that it can assert jurisdiction as well as the State over the sprinkler installation. For these reasons, we ask you to review and explain both the legal and policy support for South Burlington to require sprinklering for buildings in South Burlington not otherwise required to be sprinklered. On the other hand, if the City of South Burlington does not intend to condition project approval on sprinklering buildings not otherwise required to be sprinklered, we ask you to join with us to devise a plan for removing this condition. This plan could include a motion to reconsider before the South Burlington Planning Commission or an Environmental Court stipulation removing Condition 7. Very truly yours, Jon Anderson JTA\alw S:\Client Matters\71861\letters\jta weith.doc STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICETDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(TIRM2555 a,FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (JMCLEAN@FIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S.MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (`ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) June 16, 1999 Carolyn Hutchinson, Clerk Vermont Environmental Court 255 N. Main St., 1st Floor Barre, VT 05641 OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Re: Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes Docket No. Dear Carolyn: Enclosed for filing with regard to the above -referenced matter is my Entry of Appearance. Also enclosed is a Notice of Appeal and the filing fee of $150.00. Please give me a call if you have any questions. JSM/jp Enclosures cc: Jon Anderson, Esq. Mr. Joe Weith.�-- sorA066.cor r Since4ely, r Jbseph S. McLean L� Thank you. STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT IN RE: ) APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND ) ALBERT J. REYES AND ) RITA J. REYES ) ENVIRONMENTAL COURT DOCKET NO. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE NOW COMES JOSEPH S. MCLEAN, of the firm of Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., and hereby enters his appearance in the above - referenced matter by and on behalf of the City of South Burlington. son588.1it STITZEL. PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. VFTORNEYS AT LAN' pn 1MV 71n: Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 16th day of June, 1999. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. Attorneys for the City of South Burlington i� By: _ J 1 i S. McLean BURAK&ANDERSON MELLONI PLC COUNSELLORS AT LAN' CATF.N'A)' 6QUARF: 30 !MAIN STRIiF.T POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURIANCTON. VI-MMONT UG40?-0757 RII? S62-II51N1 STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT -------------------------------X IN RE: APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND Environmental Court ALBERT J. REYES AND RITA J. REYES Docket No. -------------------------------X NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES Mark Hill of South Burlington, Vermont and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes of Londonderry, Vermont, by and through counsel for purposes of this appeal, Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, and appeal a certain portion of a decision by the City of South Burlington, Vermont Planning Commission made on May 11, 1999 as reflected in the draft minutes attached hereto as Exhibit A. This appeal is limited to disputing Condition 7 only, requiring the approved building to be sprinklered. The mailing address of Mark Hill is Mark Hill Investments, 1233 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The mailing address of Albert J. and Rita J. Reyes is P.O. Box 435, Londonderry, Vermont 05148, with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The property with respect to which this appeal is taken is located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. It consists of approximately 3.8 acres of land on which Mark Hill proposes to locate a small building from which he will conduct an Oil 'N' Go Business. The building is so small that applicable building codes do not require it to be sprinklered. RECYCLED PAPER BURAK&ANDERSON M ELLONI PLC COUNSF:LUMS AT LAW CATFAVAI' SQl'ARE 30 MAIN STRI'ET POST OFFICI{ BOX 7S7 BVI( IVCTON. VERMONT 1154112-07S7 S02 562-051111 The regulatory provisions applicable to this appeal are all provisions of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations and 24 V.S.A., Chapter 117 including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all sections under which the City of South Burlington claims authority to require the proposed building to be sprinklered. A brief explanation of this appeal is as follows. Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose to sell a piece of land located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington to Mark Hill. Mark Hill has obtained all necessary permits for the erection of a small building from which to conduct an Oil N' Go business. One such permit, Site Plan Approval by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, requires the proposed building to be sprinklered. In imposing this unjustified requirement, the Planning Commission exceeded its authority. Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose that the condition requiring the proposed building to be sprinklered be deleted as a condition for Site Plan Approval. Dated: June 10, 1999 Burlington, Vermont. SAChent Matters\7186 I TegaMOTICE OF APPEAL.doc BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Mark Hill, Albert J. Reyes, and Rita J. Reyes 2 RECYCLED PAPER EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Quimby seconded Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staffs concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sg ft building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M.peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to Permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered. 8. In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 snared curb -cut shall straddle the ro ert line between these two ro erties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site lan a proval for a new or expanded use. this shared access is At the time constructed the Property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. y. rrior to nprmit issuance the a licant shall record a document a roved b the Cit Attorne rovidin le al a mutual access easement to the SoutherlyProperty owner. u The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months Pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zonin regulations or approval is null and void this 11. The -PPlicant shall obtain Complianca Certificate of Occupancy/ e from the Administrative building Officer prior to use of the 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission MS. Ouimby seconded Motion passed unanimously 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 16, 1999 Michael Dugan 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Auto .Service & Repair, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dugan: Enclosed is a copy of the May 11, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sit wrely, Joe eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp I End CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BUR.LINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 21, 1999 Michael Dugan 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Auto Service & Repair, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dugan: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on May 11, 1999. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Planning and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl BURAK&ANDERSON M ELLONI PLC COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAY SQUARE. 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT -------------------------------X IN RE: APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND Environmental Court ALBERT J. REYES AND RITA J. REYES Docket No. -------------------------------X NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES Mark Hill of South Burlington, Vermont and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes of Londonderry, Vermont, by and through counsel for purposes of this appeal, Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, and appeal a certain portion of a decision by the City of South Burlington, Vermont Planning Commission made on May 11, 1999 as reflected in the draft minutes attached hereto as Exhibit A. This appeal is limited to disputing Condition 7 only, requiring the approved building to be sprinklered. The mailing address of Mark Hill is Mark Hill Investments, 1233 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The mailing address of Albert J. and Rita J. Reyes is P.O. Box 435, Londonderry, Vermont 05148, with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The property with respect to which this appeal is taken is located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. It consists of approximately 3.8 acres of land on which Mark Hill proposes to locate a small building from which he will conduct an Oil 'N' Go Business. The building is so small that applicable building codes do not require it to be sprinklered. RECYCLED PAPER BURAK&ANDERSON MELLONIPLC COUNSELLORS AT I.AW GATEWAY SQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 The regulatory provisions applicable to this appeal are all provisions of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations and 24 V.S.A., Chapter 117 including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all sections under which the City of South Burlington claims authority to require the proposed building to be sprinklered. A brief explanation of this appeal is as follows. Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose to sell a piece of land located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington to Mark Hill. Mark Hill has obtained all necessary permits for the erection of a small building from which to conduct an Oil `N' Go business. One such permit, Site Plan Approval by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, requires the proposed building to be sprinklered. In imposing this unjustified requirement, the Planning Commission exceeded its authority. Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose that the condition requiring the proposed building to be sprinklered be deleted as a condition for Site Plan Approval. Dated: June 10, 1999 Burlington, Vermont. SAClient Matters\71861\Lega1\NOUCE OF APPEAL.doc BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Mark Hill, Albert J. Reyes, and Rita J. Reyes 2 RECYCLED PAPER EXHIBIT 1 E PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staff's concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sg ft building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary b) The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered 8. In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan, approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9. Prior to Permit issuance the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney rovidin a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission Ms. Quimby seconded Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 1 ♦SpN� AGF4tc� STATE OF VERMONT j AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 �tisPOR�P� June 3, 1999 Mark Hill MAC II, L.L. C. 1233 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Subject: South Burlington, US 7. L.S. 17+75 LT Dear Mr. Hill: Your highway permit application for a new commercial access, water line, and sewer line connections, at the location indicated, has been processed by this office and is enclosed. Please contact the District Transportation Administrator, Richard Hosking, to discuss the permit conditions and to arrange for his timely inspection of the work. His telephone number in Essex is (802)655-1580. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit DLA:mw Enclosures cc: Douglas Weber, Pinkham Engineernig Associates, Inc. Joseph Weith, City Planner, City of South Burlington Eric Fontana, AOT Special Projects Unit Richard Hosking, AOT District Transportation Administrator #5 Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Town_ , �1 ✓� ci Route U S-2 Mile Marker Log Station 7 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PERMIT APPLICATION Owner's/Applicant's Name Address & Phone No. P L . f i /l L L c / Co- plicant's Name, Address & Ph e,No. (if different from above) The location of w (town, hi hway route, distance to nearest mile marker or intersection & which side) m a Descr�ijp�tfiPn �o/f work/tjo be performed in the highway right -of --way (attach sketch) U " Is a Zoning Permit required? Yes No ❑ - If Yes, # 41 �c El if Yes, # Is an Act 250 permit required? Yes a Other permit(s) required? Yes El No ❑ - If Yes, name and # of each se additional sheets, it necessary Date work expected to begin St 19 Owner/Applicant Signature Date Co -Applicant Signature Date PERMIT APPROVAL This covers only the work described below: - - - Permission is granted for a new commercial access, water line and sewer line connections at the location indicated, in accord with the attached three sheets of Special Conditions. The work is subject to the restrictions and conditions on the reverse page, plus the Special Conditions stated on the attached page(s)- Date work is to be completed December 1, 1999 By L �� Issued Date June 3, 1999 Authorized Repr ntative for Secretary of Tr6fisportation NOTICE: This permit covers only the Vermont Agency of Transportation's jurisdiction over this highway under Title 19 Section 1111 VSA. It does not release the petitioner from the requirements of any other statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS No work shall be done under this permit until the owner/applicant has contacted the District Transportation Administrator at: .. TA 210 3/97 F.CSTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS ,EFINITIONS: "Agency" means the Vermont Agency of Transportation. "Engineer" means the authorized agent of the Secretary of Transportation. "Owner/Applicant" means the party(s) to whom the permit is to be issued. "Co -Applicant " means the party who performs the work, if other than Owner/Applicant. 3ENERAL: The Owner/Applicant shall be responsible for all the work. A I referenmages toces to the Owner/Applicant resultingsons or property so pertain to the Co -Applicant. from any work done under this permit, even if the Applicants Contractor performs The Owner/Applicant must comply with all federal and state statutes or regulations and all local ordinances controlling )ccupancy of public highways. In the event of a conflict, the more restrictive provision shall apply. The Owner/Applicant must, in every case where there is a possibility of injury to persons or property from blasting, use blasting mats and bags of sand, if necessary, to prevent the stone from scattering. All existing utility facilities shall be protected from damage or injury. The Owner/Applicant shall erect and maintain barriers needed to protect the traveling public. The barriers shall be grope y lighted at night. The Owner/Applicant shall not do any work or place any obstacles within the state highway right-of-way, except as authorize by this permit. The Owner/Applicant shall install catch basins and outlets as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Engineer, to preclude interference with the drainage of the state highway. the entire cost of the salary, subsistence and traveling expenses of any inspector The Owner/Applicant may be required to pay appointed by the Engineer to supervise such work. The Engineer may modify or revoke the permit at any time for safety -related reasons, without rendering the Agency or the State of Vermont liable in any way. In addition to any other enforcement powers that may be provided for by the law, the Engineer may suspend this permit unti compliance is obtained. If there is continued use or activity after suspension, the Engineer may physically close the work area and take corrective action to protect the safety of the highway users. By accepting this permit, or doing any work hereunder, the Owner/Applicant agrees to comply with all of the conditions and restrictions. UTILITY WORK; CUTTING AND TRIMMING TREES: The Owner/Applicant shall obtain the written consent of the adjoining owners or occupants or, in the alternative, an order from the State Transportation Board in accordance with Title 30, Section 2506, Vermont Statutes Annotated, regarding cutting of or injury to trees. In general, all utilities shall be located adjacent to the highway right-of-way boundary line and shall be installed without damaging the highway or the highway right-of-way. No pole pushbrace, guy wire or other aboveground facilities shall be placed closer than 10 feet to file edge c;f udveied-way. if the proposed uu�;my 4 -4'_d;..es a, ,n ccnflict with t..e above, each to .atic+n is subject to the approval of the Engineer. Poles and appurtenances shall be located out of conflict with ditches and culverts. permit, all debris resulting from such cutting and trimming shall be Where the cutting or trimming of trees is authorized by removed from the highway right-of-way. and may be Open cut excavation for highway crossings is NOT the option of the Appcant, obtain an applized onlmwd fine at a of the jacking, drilling, or tunneling methods fail or are impractical. The Owner/Applicant highway permit from the Engineer before making an open cut. The party or parses to whom the permit is granted shall be responsible for corrective action within the work area for a minimum of 18 months from the date of completion or acceptance. JOINT PERMITS: Q A joint perr tAi a ication is required when more than one party will be involved with the construction, maintenance, and/or operation of th k�V g constructed under this permit. Examples include, but are not limited to, joint ownership or occupancy of a utility pole line dteonstruction of a municipal utility line by a contractor. Both utility companies, and in the second case, the municipality .rift the' contractor, must be joint applicants. F Mark Hill dba Oil 'N' Go South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 17+75 LT June 3, 1999 SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the conditions on the back of the permit, with particular attention given to the Special Conditions listed below. The new 6" Ductile Iron Water Line is to be installed by jacking or boring and shall be placed at a depth to be compatible with the upcoming Shelburne -South Burlington highway project. The sewer line depth will also be placed so as not to be in conflict with the above project. The applicant will coordinate layout of all work with Eric Fontana of the Agency's Special Project's Unit in South Burlington, Vermont_ Provision for access to the adjacent southerly property shall be made. When the adjacent property is developed, it is our intent to require joint access via this drive. All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the detail C and the profile and notes of standard drawing B-71, copy attached, and the attached plan dated 3/26/99, and revised 4/21 /99. Act No. 86 of 1987 (30 VSA Chapter 86) ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone 1-888-344-7233 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, beginning any excavation at any location. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be subject to inspection and approval by the District Transportation Administrator or their staff. In areas to be grass covered, the turf shall be restored by preparing the area and applying the necessary topsoil, limestone, fertilizer, seed, and mulch to the satisfaction of the District Transportation Administrator. Mark Hill dba Oil 'N' Go South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 17+75 LT Special Conditions Page Two All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on all holidays (which shall include the day before and the day following), during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15, without specific, written permission from the District Transportation Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper pro- tections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of 18 months after final inspection by the District. In the event that area lighting proves to be a hazard to the traveling public, the Permit Holder will be ordered to remove or modify it at their expense. Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as-builts" with copies provided to both the Chief of Utilities & Permits and the District Transportation Administrator. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work allowed under this permit. The Permit Holder shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, or claims of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not constructed satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's expense. In the event traffic from this project increases to the point where traffic signals, additional lanes for turning, or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The Permit Holder may be required by the Agency to update or provide a traffic study to determine if additional modifications are necessary. Mark Hill dba Oil 'N' Go South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 17+75 LT Special Conditions Page Three The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of paved shoulder). "Access maintenance" will include, but not limited to, the surface of the access, the replacement of the culvert, as necessary, the trimming of vegetation, and the removal of snowbanks to provide corner sight distance. It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appropriate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Transportation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transportation Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. SEE NOTE 5 x CURB (IF PRESENT )� - TREATED SHOULDER EDGE MINIM ADIUS = RADIUS MINUS SHOULDER WIDTH xR x 20' THEORETICAL RADIUS SHOULDER EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY I LA 60° MIN. PAVEMENT HIGHWAY �� 90° DESIRABLE — I UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS rFCD�3S NOFY _1iN�/ LINEPROPERTY qpq" �NNOFD M4a AFL 2a SEE NOTE 2 MIN. CURB ON R.O.W.x MIN. R=20' R.O.W. LINE x LINER.O.W. LINE SHOULDER -- x R=5' R=5' x CURB _CIF PRESENT) EDGE OF _ 5' MIN. 100' DESIRABLE TRAVELED 40' MINIMUM PAVEMENT WAY A= 0° MINIMUM HIGHWAY 90° DESIRABLE DETAIL D TWO-WAY COMMERCIAL DRIVE WITH DIVISIONAL ISLAND DETAIL E FOR SHOPPING CENTERS. LARGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS AND SERVICE STATIONS I DRIVE 4' MIN. 24' MAX.12' MAX. 24• MAX. �_PROPERTY LINE MINIMUM RADIUS = THEORETICAL MINUS THE CURBE D DIVISIONAL ISLAND SHALL NOT SHOULDER WIDTH EED 4' HEIGHT (AND HAVE NO PROJECTION EXCEED I ABOVE THE CURB HEIGHT WITHIN THE R.O.W. LIMIT OF PARKING AREA OR CLEAR ZONE) (SEE NOTE 4) I R.O.W. LINE 30' THEORETICALXRADIUS X 30' THEORETICAL RADIUS 20, MIN 1 FRPRESENT 1 / \� MIN• -SEE DETAIL SHOULDER EDGE 12' -4 T R E HOULDE\ RIGHT TURN LANE FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVE (UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ONLY) USE WITH DETAILS C AND D WHEN VOLUME WARRANTS FOR RIGHT TURN LANES ARE MET. LIMIT OF PARKING AREA ( SEE NOTE 4 1 R.O.W. LINE x x 30' MIN. RADIUS MIN. RADIUS 30' LESS SHOULDER WIDTH n=. T=•- EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY A = 60° MINIMUM 90° DESIRABLE 4' HIGHWAY i. (IF PRESENT ) SHOULDER EDGE PAVEMENT EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY ITAPERS -LENGTH OF FULL WIDTH STORAGE (D)IS 50' A = 60° MINIMUM PAVEMENT FOR EACH 60 RIGHT TURNING VEHICLES IN SPEED (MPH) 30 40 SO HIGHWAY € 90° DESIRABLE DHV WITH MINIMUM LENGTH OF 50'. .-LENGTH (MIN)(FT)(T) 100 140 180 — — — RATE 8:1 12:1 15:1 DETAIL G PERSPECTIVE SKETCH OF DRIVE INTERSECTION DETAIL H PROFILE OF DRIVE INTERSECTION SHOWING DEPRESSION SHOWING 5" DEPRESSION ( CUT SECTION ) CLEAR ZONE DISTANCE VARIES WITH HIGHWAY CLASS AND TRAFFIC VOLUME. REVISIONS AND CORRECTIONS DEC. II, 1992 - THIS STANDARD SUPERCEDES B-71(7/23/80R), B-71A (3/12/90), AND B-13 (12/14/71). JUNE I, 1994 - REISSUED, WITHOUT CHANGE, UNDER NEW SIGNATURES. MAR. 10, 1995 - REISSUED, WITHOUT CHANGE, UNDER NEW SIGNATURES. SINGLE STORES, BUSINESSES, SMALL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS 24' MINIMUM 40' MAXIMUM MIN. RADIUS = PROPERTY LINE LIMIT OF PARKING AREA THEORETICAL 35' RECOMMENDED RADIUS MINUS ( SEE NOTE 41 SHOULDER WIDTHI R.O.W. LINE 10' THEORETICAL 1 RADIUS (URBAN) x 30' THEORETICAL X j x 130 MIN. RADIUS RADIUS (RURAL) IWI (RURAL) CURB (IF PRESENT) �� --MIN. ----� SEE DETAIL SHOULDER EDGE SHOULDER EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY A = 60° MINIMUM PAVEMENT HIGHWAY 90° DESIRABLE THIS DETAIL WILL ALSO APPLY TO COMMERCIAL SERVICE DRIVES.WHEN AUTHORIZED.HAVING A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 20'. THE SERVICE DRIVE WILL HAVE A "SERVICE VEHICLES ONLY" SIGN PLACED AT THE HIGHWAY ROW LINE.SIGN SHALL BE 18"X 24" AS PRESCRIBED IN THE STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGN BOOKLET. A SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLICATION TO MUTCD. DETAIL F MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS AND INTERSECTING SIDEROADS w a a w � W 3 ; J crI O > o coo j �'w o w r w o oIZ w 3 w ¢1 > _ LL Q (� Q w 1 al a o � _ ¢ o W I W V li I li o 40' MIN. MIN. 100' RURAL • w o j o w 0 1 o MIN. 50' URBAN o l u w I w � I EDGE OF SHOULDER 1 _ EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY ------ -- HIGHWAY l-- ----- EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY EDGE OF SHOULDER • MINIMUM UNLESS NO OTHER REASONABLE ACCESS IS AVAILABLE AND PRIOR APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY THE A.O.T. OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS TRAFFIC SIGNALS. HIGH TRAFFIC VOLUMES. OR FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF HIGHWAY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WHEN DETERMINING APPROPRIATE OFFSET DISTANCE DETAIL I PROFILE OF DRIVE INTERSECTION ( FILL SECTION DRIVE GRADE (15 % MAX.FOR AT LEAST 12 FEET FROM POINT MIN 10' Of VERTICAL INTERSECTION) 5" DEPRESSION EDGE OF EDGE OF HIGHWAY ROUNDING EDGE OF EDGE OF HIGHWAY A— SHOULDER TRAVELED WAY rt LENGTH 20'-0" MIN. SHOULDER TRAVELED WAY F{ 12'-0" APPROACH AREA MIN. MIN 20' I -3% MAX. GRADE (-0.03 ) ROUNDING I -IS% MAX l-0.)5) ___-------�"c��� I OLD GROUND ENGTH �---__----- �� SUBGRADE LINE 1 L V SUBGRADE LINE --� __---------- '�P I ( SEE NOTE 7) CULVERT IF NEEDED TO BE SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS BUT NO LESS THAN 15 " INSIDE DIAMETER . DETAIL J CROWN 1/4'PER FOOT. SUBBASE MATERIAL IF PAVED DRIVE :SURFACE WITH 2" 12"ON RESIDENTAL DRIVES BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT. DRIVE CROSS SECTION AT DITCHLINE 24" MINIMUM - I8" ON COMMERCIAL DRIVES IF GRAVEL DRIVE :SURFACE WITH 3" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE END SECTION REFER TO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE FOR TREATMENT AT CULVERT END ------------ LOCAL GRADING NECESSARY, AS NEEDED APPROVED ��� FOR THIS PROJECT ND/OR DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION. FHWA FW1L APPROVAL PENDING. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING n UTILITIES ENGINdER DRIVE SUBGRADE LINE i DRIVE SIDE SLOPES SUMSE ::ATERAL LOCATION SLOPE RATE _ V > 40 MPH 6:IOR FLATTER URBAN AREAS.OR V C 40 MPH J4:1 DESIRABLE SECTION A -A 12:1 ALLOWABLE DITCH LINE OUTSIDE CLEAR ZONE 2:IOR FLATTER STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAIL AND COMMERCIAIL OLIVES GREATER THAN MINIMUM VALUES TO BE USED WHENEVER FEASIBLE 1. THIS SHEET IS INTENDED FOR USE, BY DESIGNERS ON HIGHWAY AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PERMIT, FOR WORK WITHIN HIGHI OF WAY (FORM TA 210). ALL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY Ti PERMIT AND INDICATED ON THIS SHEET SHALL BE THE RESP OF THE APPLICANT AND IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE VT. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEN USED WITH THE FOR A HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. THIS SHEET IS INTE A GUIDE FOR THE DESIGNER CONCERNING MIN/MAX DRIVE WID OTHER VERTICAL AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS. 2. ALL COMMERCIAL DRIVES SHALL BE PAVED FROM THE EDGE 01 TRAVELED WAY TO THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE FARTHEST POINT OF CURVATURE ON THE DRIVEWAY EDGE OR DIRECTED BY THE DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATOR IS INDICATED IN THE DETAILS BY CROSS -HATCHING. 3.DEPTH OF SUB -BASE, BASE, AND PAVEMENT TO BE THE SAME HIGHWAY OR MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN DETAIL J. WITHIN THE LIMI OF THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 4. VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM PARKING AREAS TO THE RIGHT-OF-W AT OTHER THAN APPROVED ACCESS POINTS WILL BE PREVEN THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURBING OR OTHER SUITABLE PHYSICA 5. IF CURB IS PRESENT, SEE APPROPRIATE CURB DETAIL STANDAI MATCH TOWN/CITY STANDARD CURB TREATMENT. 6. WHERE THE DESIGN HOUR VOLUME OF LEFT TURNING TRAFFIC I THE HIGHWAY INTO THE DRIVE IS SUBSTANTIAL, THE VT. AGENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAY REOUIRE SPECIAL LEFT -TURN TREA AND/OR TRAFFIC SIGNALS. THE AGENCY WILL DETERMINE THE TREATMENT TO BE USED, AND WILL WORK WITH THE DEVELOP REGARD TO IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES ON STATE HIGHWA 7. CIRCULAR DRAINAGE CULVERTS UNDER DRIVES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER ( I.D.) OF 15". PIPE ARCHES USED UNDER DRIVES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSIDE CROSS-Sl AREA EOUIVALENT TO THAT PROVIDED BY A 15" CIRCULAR PIF 8. THE OFFSET BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY MAY BE GOVERNED BY LOCAL ZONING LAW' DRIVEWAY WIDTH RESTRICTIONS SHOWN PERTAIN ONLY TO THE WITHIN THE HIGHWAY R.O.W.. 9. DRIVEWAY GRADES STEEPER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY BE ALLC AS LONG AS A 20' APPROACH AREA IS ACHIEVED FOR THE VEHICLE TO PAUSE BEFORE ENTERING THE HIGHWAY. 10. CORNER SIGHT DISTANCES, EOUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOS SHOWN BELOW, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FOR DRIVES ENTERING ON PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM A POINT ON THI AT LEAST 15 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY OF T ADJACENT ROADWAY AND MEASURED FROM A HEIGHT OF EYE FEET ON THE DRIVE TO A HEIGHT OF 4.25 FEET ON THE ROA SIGHT DISTANCE CHART POSTED SPEED OR DESIGN SPEED (M.P.H.) MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (FT) MINIMUM CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE (1990 AASHTO) (FT) 25 150 275 30 _ 35 -_ --_ 40 200 225 355 445 275 560 45 325 660 50 400 770 55 450 935 NOTE : ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS WILL BE REOURED IF OBTAIN/ CORNER SIGHT DISTANCES ARE BELOW MINIMUM STOPPI SIGHT DISTANCES. ••ASSUMES AN APPROACHING VEHICLE WILL REDUCE ITS SPEED (BY DECELERATION) TO 85% OF THE POSTED OR DESIGN SPEED OF THE BEFORE OVERTAKING A VEHICLE ENTERING THE TRAFFIC STREAM 1 ASSUMES THE VEHICLE ENTERING THE TRAFFIC STREAM WILL ACCEL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO THE SPEED OF THE APPROACHING VEHIC WHEN CONSIDERING ACCESSES ONTO EXISTING HIGHWAYS THERE MA) SITUATIONS WHEN A DRIVER WILL NOT HAVE THE MINIMUM CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE AND WILL HAVE TO REDUCE HIS RUNNING SPEED TO ALLOW AN ENTERING VEHICLE TIME TO ENTER THE STREAM OF STANDAR Heindel and Noyes • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers • Environmental Scientists P.O. Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 April 19, 1999 Mr. Mark Hill Mark Hill Investments 1233 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Bartlett Brook Stormwater Modelling for proposed "Oil & Go" Dear Mr. Hill: This letter/report presents the results of our hydrologic evaluation of the proposed 1693 Shelburne Road development. The proposed development is located within the Bartlett Brook watershed. The analysis was performed using information provided by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. for the project site. This included the computation of existing and proposed impervious area, hydraulic curve numbers, pre- and post - development time of concentrations, and detention pond specifications. Heindel and Noyes verified calculations, and the data was input into the calibrated model for the entire watershed. An evaluation was performed for the 25-year, 24-hour storm, which results in 4.00 inches of rain in South Burlington. To evaluate the overall impact of the proposed expansion on the watershed, peak discharge rates have been computed at three locations. Peak discharge rates are calculated for two different scenarios: pre -development and post -development with a detention basin. At the outflow of the development site, the projected peak discharge rate is 2.48 cfs for the existing condition. For the post -development condition with detention pond, peak flows are predicted to decrease to 1.31 cfs. At the point where the runoff from the remainder of the property (undeveloped) and adjacent property (remainder of the Reyes property) joins Bartlett Brook, the peak discharge rates are 9.50 cfs and 9.17 cfs for pre - and post -development conditions, respectively. At the point where Bartlett Brook crosses the railroad tracks, the peak discharge rates are 96.24 cfs, and 94.94 cfs for pre -development conditions and post -development conditions with a detention pond, respectively. At the base of the watershed (Bartlett Bay), the peak discharge rates are 201.33 cfs and 201.25 cfs for pre -development and post -development conditions with a detention pond, respectively. This information is summarized in the following table. Mr. Mark Hill April 16, 1999 Page 2 Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates Location Pre -Development Conditions (cfs) Post -Development Conditions w/ Detention Pond (cfs) Site Outlet 2.48 1.31 Reyes Property 9.50 9.17 Railroad Tracks Culvert 96.24 94.94 Base of Watershed 201.33 201.25 Based on these results, it is our conclusion that the storm water management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission for the Bartlett Brook/North Brook watershed will be met with the inclusion of a storm water detention pond on the proposed project site. The model detention pond has a bottom area of 1,089 square feet, side slope of 3.1, a total depth of 3 feet, a maximum desired stage of 18 inches and a 6-inch orifice. This basin will adequately contain 6,737 cubic feet of flood water and effectively reduce the peak flow from the developed area to 1.31 cfs during a high rainfall event. The proposed volume/elevation relationship for the detention pond is included in the attachment page 2. Since the maximum water surface elevation attained in the pond during the design storm is 144.31 feet, this should serve as the minimum pond elevation prior to outflow through an emergency spillway. The emergency spillway should be designed by the project engineer. At the maximum design water surface elevation (145 ft), a pond storage capacity of approximately 6,972 cubic feet is specified. The proposed detention structure not only keeps post -development peak flows equal to pre -development, but also reduces the peak flows from the site by 47%. For the Bartlett Brook Watershed as a whole, the peak discharge is decreased from its existing level (201.33 cfs existing, 201.25 cfs proposed, with detention pond). Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. J Sincerely, Dori Barton Staff Scientist Enclosures CC'. Doug Hewitt, Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc. Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner U\DBARTWOil & Go\Hill.DOC Site Location Map a 1:15188 IN F OR M AT 10 N VISUALIZATION E R V I C E S Oil and Go South Burlington, Vermont Stormwater Modelling Pond Storage Calculations Depth Area Incremental Total ft S .ft storage cu.ft Storage cu.ft 143 2752 0 0 144 3468 3110 3110 145 4256 3862 6972 Assume side slopes 1:3 i.3;\DBARTON\Oil & Go\Appendices.wb3 Hydrograph Summary Report Page 1 Hyd, No, Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 2.3 2 728 10,407 25 ---- ------ ----- Reach S 2 SCS Runoff 8.2 2 726 26,500 25 -- -- --- Quayle Run (#1) 3 Combine 10.4 2 726 36,908 25 1 + 2 --- --- 4 Manual 25.6 2 864 622,296 25 --- ------ ------ Reach S 5 Reach 10.1 2 730 36,906 25 3 --- --- Reach R/Q 6 Combine 33.3 2 732 659,202 25 4 + 5 --- - Reach R/BB2 7 SCS Runoff 8.2 2 726 26,500 25 --- -- -- Quayle Run (#2) 8 Combine 40.4 2 730 685,101 25 6 + 7 ------ ------ Reach Q/Reach P 9 SCS Runoff 10.2 2 730 40,906 25 Harborview Runoff 10 Reach 9.1 2 740 46,041 25 9 ---- -- Reach K 11 SCS Runoff 9.4 2 732 41,555 25 ---- ----- --- S.F.H Dev Runoff 12 SCS Runoff 10.9 2 732 47,788 25 ---- --- Kean Lane Runoff 13 Combine 20.3 2 732 89,343 25 11 + 12 ----- -- Reach MIN 14 Combine 27.7 2 736 135,385 25 10 + 13 ---- --- Reach K/Reach L 15 Reach 27.7 2 738 135,384 25 14 ----- -- Reach J 16 SCS Runoff 8.6 2 720 19,732 25 ---- ---- --- BayCourt Condos g 17 { Reservoir 5.4 2 724 19,570 25 16 194.63 2,932 Baycourt/Pond 18 Combine 31.4 2 736 154,955 25 15 + 17 --- Baycourt/Reach J 19 Combine 40.6 2 734 195,860 25 8 + 18 --- -- Reach J/Reach O 20 SCS Runoff 20.0 2 734 93,106 25 --- -- Field & Above Wate 21 SCS Runoff 11.5 2 720 26,310 25 -- --- -- Harbor Heights 22 SCS Runoff 16.2 2 718 37.056 25 --- --- -- Harbor Heights RO 23 Combine 22.5 2 722 119,416 25 20 + 21 ---. - Habor Heights RO/R 24 Combine 38.2 2 720 156,472 25 22 + 23 - - Harbor Heights RO/ 25 Combine 65.0 2 734 352,333 25 19 + 24 -- Reach I/Reach F 26 Reach 64.7 2 736 352,326 25 25 Reach E 27 SCS Runoff 10.9 2 718 24,896 25 -- --- -- GMP 2E Combine 67.1 2 724 377,222 25 26 + 27 _- -- Reach E/GMP 29 SCS Runoff 1.0 2 716 2,313 25 -- ----- --- SE Parking 30 SCS Runoff 2.0 2 720 5,400 25 --- --- - North Parking _--IL Combine 1.3 1 2 718 1 3,494 25 1 29 + 30 --- - Parking Combined Proj. file: BB325yr1999.GPW OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date. 04-16-1999 Hydrograph Summary Report Page 2 IHyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuft) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description I32 SCS Runoff 0.9 2 724 3,155 25 -- -- Larkin Center Fiel 33 SCS Runoff 3.1 2 718 7,723 25 — -- --- Sunset to Basin I34 SCS Runoff 0.2 2 722 548 25 -- - -- Watershed 1 35 SCS Runoff 2.1 2 716 4,318 25 — -- Watershed 2 136 Combine 4.6 2 718 11,765 25 33 + 31 -- -- Larkin To Basin 37 Combine 1.5 2 728 11,765 25 34 + 35 -- — Watersheds 1 &2 I38 Reservoir 0.6 2 734 14,920 25 36 158.63 3,959 Larkin Pond 39 Combine 5.8 2 726 31,162 25 32 + 37 --- -- Larkin not to Pond Combine 8.2 2 726 46,082 25 38 + 39 — -- Total from Larkin 141 41 Combine 74.5 2 724 423,304 25 28 + 40 -- — Reach FJLarkin 42 Reservoir 72.0 2 730 420,892 25 41 148.17 22,795 RT 7 culvert L43 SCS Runoff 32.9 2 718 79,217 25 — — — Shearer Parking 44 SCS Runoff 9.5 2 724 30,250 25 — — Reyes 45 Combine 86.7 2 724 500,109 25 42 + 43 — — North Fork/Shearer 46 Combine 96.2 2 724 530,359 25 44 + 45 --- North fork/ Reyes 147 Manual 146.9 2 760 2,865,214 25 — — Reach Z 48 Combine 199.5 2 752 3,395,577 25 46 + 47 — — North Fork/South F 149 Reservoir 200.3 2 752 3,394,451 25 48 104.64 22,877 Brigham Rd Culvert 50 SCS Runoff 7.5 2 722 19,910 25 Base watershed 151 I Combine 201.3 2 752 3,414,362 25 50 + 49 — Outflow to Lake Proj. file: BB325yr1999.GPW OF file: bbidfADF Run date: 04-16-1999 Oydrograph Summary Report Page 1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuft) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 2.3 2 728 10,407 25 ---- ------ --- Reach S 2 SCS Runoff 8.2 2 726 26,500 25 --- ---- ---- Quayle Run (#1) 13 Combine 10.4 2 726 36,908 25 1 + 2 --- ----- 4 Manual 25.6 2 864 622,296 25 --- ----- ---- Reach S 15 Reach 10.1 2 730 36,906 25 3 ------ -- Reach R/Q 6 Combine 33.3 2 732 659,202 25 4 + 5 -- --- Reach R/BB2 17 SCS Runoff 8.2 2 726 26,500 25 - -- Quayle Run (#2) 8 Combine 40.4 2 730 685.701 25 6+ 7 _-`- Reach Q/Reach P 9 SCS Runoff 10.2 2 730 40,906 25 -- --- ---- Harborview Runoff 110 Reach 9.2 2 744 46,041 25 9 --- Reach K 11 SCS Runoff 9.4 2 732 41,555 25 -- -- --- S.F.H Dev Runoff 112 SCS Runoff 10.9 2 732 47,788 25 --- ---- -- Keah Lane Runoff 13 Combine 20.3 2 732 89,343 25 11 + 12 --- --- Reach M/N I14 Combine 25.6 2 738 135,384 25 10 + 13 --- -- Reach K/Reach L 15 Reach 25.6 2 740 135,384 25 14 ----- --- Reach J 16 SCS Runoff 8.6 2 720 19,732 25 - -- -- BayCourt Condos 17 Reservoir 5.4 __ 2 724 19,570 25 16 194.63 2,932 Baycourt/Pond Combine 29.0 2 736 154,954 25 15 + 17 -- -- Baycourt/Reach J 118 19 Combine 38.1 2 734 195,860 25 8 + 18 ----- -- Reach J/Reach O 2G SCS Runoff 20.0 2 734 93,106 25 - --- - Field & Above Wate 21 SCS Runoff 11.5 2 720 26,310 25 -- --- - Harbor Heights i 2, SCS Runoff 16.2 2 718 37,056 25 - Harbor Heights RO 23 Combine 22.5 2 722 119,416 25 20 + 21 -- - Habor Heights RO/R 24 Combine 38.2 2 720 156,472 25 22 + 23 --- Harbor Heights RO/ 25 Combine 62.5 2 734 352,332 25 19 + 24 --- Reach I/Reach F 26 Reach 62.2 2 736 352,327 25 25 --- - Reach E d27 SCS Runoff 10.9 2 718 24,896 25 - --- -- GMP 8 Combine 66.4 2 724 377,223 25 26 + 27 ---- -- Reach E/GMP 29 SCS Runoff 1.0 2 716 2,313 25 -- ------ -- SE Parking 30 SCS Runoff 2.0 2 720 5,400 25 -- - -- North Parking 31 Combine 1 1.3 2 1 718 3,494 25 29 + 30 - Parking Combined ?Proj. file: bb3post.25yrreal6in Gl1WlDF file: bbidf.IDF TRun date: 04-16-1999 Hydrograph Summary Report Page 2 IHyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 132 SCS Runoff 0.9 2 724 3,155 25 - ----- ---- Larkin Center Fiel 33 SCS Runoff 3.1 2 718 7,723 25 - -- --- Sunset to Basin 134 SCS Runoff 0.2 2 722 548 25 - -- -- Watershed 1 35 SCS Runoff 2.1 2 716 4,318 25 - - ---- Watershed 2 136 Combine 4.6 2 718 11,765 25 33 + 31 - Larkin To Basin 37 Combine 1.5 2 728 11,765 25 34 + 35 - - Watersheds 1 &2 j 38 Reservoir 0.6 2 734 14,920 25 36 158.63 3,959 Larkin Pond 11 39 Combine 5.8 2 726 31,162 25 32 + 37 - -- Larkin not to Pond 40 Combine 8.2 2 726 46,082 25 38 + 39 --- --- Total from Larkin 141 Combine 73.9 2 724 423,305 25 28 + 40 - Reach E/Larkin 42 Reservoir 70.8 2 728 420,893 25 41 148.13 22,516 RT 7 culvert 143 SCS Runoff 32.9 2 718 79,217 25 - - --- Shearer Parking 44 SCS Runoff 2.9 2 722 8,281 25 - -- - Reyes 145 SCS Runoff 3.1 2 718 7,048 25 - - - Hill Dev 46 Reservoir 0.7 2 730 6,737 25 45 144.31 4,296 Hill Basin 47 SCS Runoff 0.8 2 716 1,646 25 - Hill Dev. not to p 48 SCS Runoff 5.2 _. 2 722 13,838 25 - - - Hill undeveloped 49 Combine 1.3 2 718 8,384 25 46 + 47 - - Hill Development T 50 Combine 6.3 2 720 22,221 25 48 + 49 -- - Hill total 51 Combine 9.2 2 722 30,502 25 50 + 44 - - Reyes & Hill 52 Combine 86.3 2 724 500,110 25 42 + 43 NorthFork/Shearer 53 Combine 94.9 2 724 530,612 25 51 + 52 North fork/ Reyes 54 Manual 146.9 2 760 2,865,214 25 - - - Reach Z 55 Combine 199.9 2 752 3,395,827 25 53 + 54 - North Fork/South F 56 Reservoir 200.2 2 752 3,394,702 25 55 104.64 22,876 Brigham Rd Culvert 57 SCS Runoff 7.5 2 722 19,910 25 - - Base watershed 58 Combine 201.3 2 752 3,414,615 25 57 + 56 - - Outflow to Lake Proj. file: bb3post25yrreal6in.G WIDF file: bbidf.OF Run date: 04-16-1999 Hydrograph Summary Report Page 1 Hyd„ No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuft) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 a I i I I SCS Runoff 2.5 2 720 5,679 25 ---- ------ ------ Site I I I y I Proj. file: sitepre-dev.GPW OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 04-16-1999 jHydrograph Summary Report Page 1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuft) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description I1 SCS Runoff 3.1 2 718 7,048 25 -- ------ ----- New Development 2 Reservoir 0.7 2 730 6,737 25 1 144.31 4,296 Pond Route 3 SCS Runoff 0.8 2 716 1,646 25 -- - ------ Area not to pond 4 I Combine 1.3 2 718 8,384 25 2 + 3 ----- ----- Total runoff Proj. file: site-post8inrealcont.G WIDF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 04-16-1999 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Albert and Rita Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 862-5088 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) 1095 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 JWJ Realty 658-2300 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Bill Savoie (same as ahnve) Agent: Gary Lavigne, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, 30 So. Park Drive, Colchester, 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1691 Shelburne Road VT 05446 655-5020 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Automobile Dealership 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Total s.f. - 15 650 1st Floor - 13,250, 2nd Floor - 2,400 Max height - 25f; Total permissible - 73,000 s f 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 20 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 8 %; landscaped areas__aZ% building, parking, outside storage 43 % 10 ) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 800,000 Landscaping $ 15,545 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost') $ 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 1, 1995 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 750 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday A.M. peak: 8-9 a.m. = 31 P.M. peak: 4-6 p.m. = 46 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATI""- 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATIO 7-1-94 DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING 0 PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible.) Location\of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings,.,existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaj�'r ng plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of,Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required.', Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires sepa- rate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet. by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable) - Location of any easements.; Lot coverage information: B ilding footprint,\ building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site ( Street # rind lot. #) . North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. 2 BuRAK ANDERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA HAND DELIVERY Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick 34 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Michael L. Burak" Jon Anderson Thomas R. Mellon* Brian J. Sullivant Robert I. Goetzt Daniel A. Seff•t Michael B. Rosenberg' Of Counsel 'Also admitted in New York tAlso admitted in Illinois *Also admitted in Massachusetts "TAdmitted in New York Only oAlso admitted in Virginia and the District of Columbia June 10, 1999 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862.0500 Fax 802 862-8176 e-mail: attorney@vtlawl.com wwwvtlawl.com Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Montpelier Office: 74 East State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05607. 802 229.0466 Re: In Re: Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes, Environmental Court Docket No. Dear Mr. O'Rourke: Enclosed for filing in the above -referenced matter is a Notice of Appeal. I have enclosed a check in the amount of $150.00 for the filing fee. Very truly yours, on Anderson JTA\alw Enclosures cc: Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner (via hand delivery) SAClient Matters\71861\letters\jta o'rourke.doc Recycled Paper STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT -------------------------------X IN RE: APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND Environmental Court ALBERT J. REYES AND RITA J. REYES Docket No. -------------------------------X NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES Mark Hill of South Burlington, Vermont and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes of Londonderry, Vermont, by and through counsel for purposes of this appeal, Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, and appeal a certain portion of a decision by the City of South Burlington, Vermont Planning Commission made on May 11, 1999 as reflected in the draft minutes attached hereto as Exhibit A. This appeal is limited to disputing Condition 7 only, requiring the approved building to be sprinklered. The mailing address of Mark Hill is Mark Hill Investments, 1233 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The mailing address of Albert J. and Rita J. Reyes is P.O. Box 435, Londonderry, Vermont 05148, with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The property with respect to which this appeal is taken is located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. It consists of approximately 3.8 acres of land on which Mark Hill proposes to locate a small building from which he will conduct an Oil 'N' Go Business. The BUItAK&ANDERSON MELLONIPLC building is so small that applicable building codes do not require it to be sprinklered. COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAY SQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 RURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 RECYCLED PAPER BURA%ZINDERSON MELLON1PLc COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAY SQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 The regulatory provisions applicable to this appeal are all provisions of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations and 24 V.S.A., Chapter 117 including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all sections under which the City of South Burlington claims authority to require the proposed building to be sprinklered. A brief explanation of this appeal is as follows. Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose to sell a piece of land located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington to Mark Hill. Mark Hill has obtained all necessary permits for the erection of a small building from which to conduct an Oil 'N' Go business. One such permit, Site Plan Approval by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, requires the proposed building to be sprinklered. In imposing this unjustified requirement, the Planning Commission exceeded its authority. Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose that the condition requiring the proposed building to be sprinklered be deleted as a condition for Site Plan Approval. Dated: June 10, 1999 Burlington, Vermont. SAClient Matters\71861\Lega1\NOT7CE OF APPEAL.doc UM BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC Anderson, Esq. Attorneys for Mark Hill, Albert J. Reyes, and Rita J. Reyes 4 RECYCLED PAPER EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staff's concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sg ft building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the _purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacitv is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered. 8.In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two Properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a suf f icient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9. Prior to permit issuance the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney providing a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months Pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission Ms. Quimby seconded Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 5 BURAK DERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA HAND DELIVERY Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick 34 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Michael L. Burak" Jon _Anderson Thomas R. JlelloriF Brian .1. Sullivant Robert I. Goetz* Daniel A. Seff"t Michael 13. Rosenberg' Of Counsel °.l, o admitted in Nel: Yi,rk fA " admitted in lllino;s $Also admitted in Jlar.a_t hwcttr. tAdmitted in New York Onh 0A1,o admitted in Virgi,ti:t and the District of Columbia June 10, 1999 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlimiton, Vermont 0J4o2-0787 Phone. 802 862-0500 KLx sot 862.8176 e-mail: attorney(avdawl.com Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Montpelier Office: 74East State Street 802 229.0466 Re: In Re: Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes; Environmental Court Docket No. Dear Mr. O'Rourke: Enclosed for filing in the above -referenced matter is a Notice of Appeal. I have enclosed a check in the amount of $150.00 for the filing fee. Very truly yours, on Anderson JTA\alw Enclosures cc: Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner (via hand delivery) S:\Client Matters\71861letters\jta o'rourke.doc 1ce,cicd Paper BURAK ERSON MELLONI PLC Counsellors at Law VIA HAND DELIVERY Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick 34 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Michael L. Burak• Jon Anderson Thomas R. Melloni" Brian J. Sullivant Robert 1. Goetz# Daniel A. Seff"t Michael B. Rosenberg) Of Counsel *Also admitted in New York tAlso admitted in Illinois $:Vso admitted in Massachusetts '[Admitted in New York Only 4Alsu admitted in Virginia and the District of Columbia June 10, 1999 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington. Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax 802 862.8176 e-niaiL attorney@vdawl.eom vvwtievtlaw l .com Daniel P. O'Rourke, Esq. Clerk, Planning Commission City of South Burlington c/o Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Montpelier Offer. 74 East State Street MontpOicr, Yirmont 05602 802 2290466 Re: In Re: Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes: Environmental Court Docket No. Dear Mr. ORourke: Enclosed for filing in the above -referenced matter is a Notice of Appeal. I have enclosed a check in the amount of $150.00 for the filing fee. Very truly yours, Jon Anderson JTA\alw Enclosures p cc: Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner (via hand delivery) t Q S:\Client Matters\71861\ietters\jta o'rourke.doc par- Ree.Ncicd ISiper BURAI.ANDERSON MELLONIPLc COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAY SQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT -------------------------------X IN RE: APPEAL OF MARK HILL AND Environmental Court ALBERT J. REYES AND RITA J. REYES Docket No. -------------------------------X NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES Mark Hill of South Burlington, Vermont and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes of Londonderry, Vermont, by and through counsel for purposes of this appeal, Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, and appeal a certain portion of a decision by the City of South Burlington, Vermont Planning Commission made on May 11, 1999 as reflected in the draft minutes attached hereto as Exhibit A. This appeal is limited to disputing Condition 7 only, requiring the approved building to be sprinklered. The mailing address of Mark Hill is Mark Hill Investments, 1233 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The mailing address of Albert J. and Rita J. Reyes is P.O. Box 435, Londonderry, Vermont 05148, with a copy to Jon Anderson, Esq., Burak Anderson & Melloni, PLC, P.O. Box 787, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787. The property with respect to which this appeal is taken is located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. It consists of approximately 3.8 acres of land on which Mark Hill proposes to locate a small building from which he will conduct an Oil 'N' Go Business. The building is so small that applicable building codes do not require it to be sprinklered. RECYCLED PAPER 3URAI(o NDERSON MELLLCONI PLC COUNSELLORS AT LAW GATEWAYSQUARE 30 MAIN STREET POST OFFICE BOX 787 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0787 802 862-0500 The regulatory provisions applicable to this appeal are all provisions of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations and 24 V.S.A., Chapter 117 including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all sections under which the City of South Burlington claims authority to require the proposed building to be sprinklered. A brief explanation of this appeal is as follows. Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose to sell a piece of land located at 1691 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington to Mark Hill. Mark Hill has obtained all necessary permits for the erection of a small building from which to conduct an Oil 'N' Go business. One such permit, Site Plan Approval by the City of South Burlington Planning Commission, requires the proposed building to be sprinklered. In imposing this unjustified requirement, the Planning Commission exceeded its authority. Mark Hill and Albert J. Reyes and Rita J. Reyes propose that the condition requiring the proposed building to be sprinklered be deleted as a condition for Site Plan Approval. Dated: June 10, 1999 Burlington, Vermont. SAChent Matters\71861\Lega1\NOTICE OF APPEAL.doc BURAK ANDERSON & MELLONI, PLC Anderson, Esq. attorneys for Mark Hill, Albert J. Reyes, and Rita J. Reyes 2 RECYCLED PAPER EXHIBIT 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Ouimbv seconded Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staff's concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq ft building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," Ca PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one additional parking space. c) The plan shall be revised to address comments #1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the purpose of c_alculatinq road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51 36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a_ $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building cannot be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7. The building shall be sprinklered 8. In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road This PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site Plan, approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed the property owner of this ro ert 1691 Shelburne Road shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9. Prior to permit issuance the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney rovidin a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10. The.applicant shall obtain a -zoning ermit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void 11. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building 12. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms. Quimby seconded Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 19, 1999 Michael Dugan 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Auto Service & Repair, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dugan: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, April 30, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerow, AavymoXn'd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PAM R. PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM2555 cF1RMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE a IRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) June 4, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert J. Perry, Esq. Perry & Schmucker PO Box 2323 South Burlington, VT 05407-2323 Re: Oil 'N' Go - Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Bob: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA I was contacted by Mark Hill earlier this week regarding his proposed auto service station at 1691 Shelburne Road. I understand that one of the conditions of his site plan approval is the creation of a shared access easement with the property to the south of Mr. Hill's property. I enclose for your review a draft Notice of Conditions of Site Plan Approval. This Notice of Conditions will be recorded in the South Burlington Land Records and must be referred to in any subsequent legal document conveying the property or any interest in the property (i.e. a Shared Access Easement). Please let me know your comments regarding the enclosed document and provide me with a proposed Shared Access Easement as required by Condition 9 of the Planning Commission's site plan approval for this project. Note that the Planning Commission's Findings and Decision has not yet been issued. I am working off of the minutes of the May 11, 1999 meeting. See attached. Meanwhile, please give me a call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure cc: Ray Belair scr.905C.cr GRAFT NOTICE OF CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, Mark Hill ("Applicant" herein) received approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission by written decision dated 1999 for: (1) constructing a 3,295 square foot building for auto service and repair on property commonly known and designated as 1691 Shelburne Road, located in the City of South Burlington (the "Applicant's Property"), as depicted on a plan, entitled "Overall Site Plan, Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill, Owner, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated March 26, 1999, last revised ; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission granted said site plan approval subject to certain conditions as set forth in the final approval motion; NOW THEREFORE the Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plan are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicant's Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor: 1. Applicant agrees to grant to the owner of property commonly known and designated as Shelburne Road (which property is presently owned by ) an easement for access onto Applicant's Property 15 feet in width on Applicant's southerly boundary, as shown on the above -referenced plan. Said access easement shall grant to the owner of Shelburne Road the right to pass by vehicle and on foot from Shelburne Road to Applicant's Property and across Applicant's Property by the paved travelways shown on the above -referenced plan, or subsequent modifications thereof which are approved by 1 the Planning Commission. Applicant agrees to construct those improvements on its property which are necessary to accommodate said access. 2. Applicant's obligation to grant an access easement as described in Paragraph 1 above shall be conditioned upon the following: a. The owner of Shelburne Road must grant Applicant reciprocal rights of access across the Shelburne Road property. b. The owner of Shelburne Road shall improve such property necessary to accommodate said shared access and parking, as determined by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3. This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the property or any interest in the property. 4. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant's successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of , 1999. IN THE PRESENCE OF: By: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. OIL 'N' GO Mark Hill At , in said County, this day of 1999, Mark Hi personally appeared and f�e acknowle ge is instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: Son153.rea 7 FROM : City cf Sc. B I FAX NC. : 1 e02 659 4746 '�n. 01 1999 02:44PM F1 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously 5. Site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sq. ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road: Mr. Dugan noted that the property is next to Shearer Chevrolet. The proposed building will be single story and will be for "Oil & Go." Mr. Dugan showed a picture of a similar business located in Essex Junction. Mr. Dugan noted that one of staff's concerns was access and circulation. The applicant initially proposed a curb cut in the center of the property to facilitate how business is done. The AOT then got into the discussion regarding the potential median on Shelburne Rd. They did not recommend the proposed curb cut, so the applicant moved it to a location recommended by the AOT. This location uses an existing curb cut that goes into a field. Staff suggests moving the curb cut even further to the south so it would almost straddle the property line. The applicant feels that since there is no approved use for the adjacent property, they should be able to have a curb cut that is better for them and is OK'd by the AOT. Mr. O'Rourke noted that a letter from the AOT also supports the staff recommendation. Mr. Weith said that city, staff, and the AOT all recommend the two properties be served by one curb cut. The property owner to the south is not willing to cooperate in building the curb cut at this time, so the City Attorney recommends building the curb cut as far south as possible. Then, when the owner to the south comes in, they will be required to use this curb cut and build it as if it were one property. After some discussion the applicant agreed to move the curb cut to the edge of the property line. They also agreed to a 30-foot driveway. Trees will be placed where the AOT says they are acceptable. Things will be shifted 4 ft. to keep out of the state's construction easement. The proposed building meets all setbacks and coverages. They are short one parking space but could put one more up front. The applicant was reminded about the wait for sewer allocation. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 sg._ft. building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three page set of plans, page one entitled "Overall Site Plan Oil 'N' Go Mark Hill -Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," Post-ie Fax Note 7671 Date1/5 pages► TO From /,� i /�i CoJDtpL Co. PTion6 0 Phone M Fax 0 Fax a FROM : City cf So. B FAX NO. : 1 B02 658 4748 dun. 01 1999 02:45PM P2 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 Prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99 with the following stipulations• 1. All Previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance: a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut ap- proximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. bj The site plan shall be revised to add one additional Parking space. c) The Plan shall be revised to address comments *1-4 in the VAOT's letter dated 5/11/99. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the south Burlinqton Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51 36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. _4_. All exterior liahtina shall consist of downcastinq shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall Post a $5250 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving 6. The Planningt Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125gpd The applicant shall be required to pav the per gallon fee prior to cLranted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the will ne issued and the building as sewer capacity is available 7. The building shall be sprinklered to safe access alo olu.me roadwa south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road This FROM : City of So. 2 FAX NO. : 1 902 E58 4748 'un. 01 1999 02:45PM F3 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MAY 1999 shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1 91 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 30 feet. 9 Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney providing a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10 The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 11 The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 12 Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms Ouimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 sq. ft. of shopping center use,' 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7000 sq. ft. retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street: Mr. O'Leary reviewed the history of the proposed city street. He noted that the City Council concurred with keeping the driveways lined up and having a curving road. They asked the applicant to try to get the taking of land more equal between the two properties. Mr. O'Leary said they have done that, making the taking almost 50-50. The road will swing closer to the Dorset Square property and they will shift the building 8 ft. to the west. This means that the walkways won't line up. They will also have to reconfigure the green area. Mr. O'Rourke asked if this creates an off -center intersection. Mr. O'Leary said it will be slightly off -center but it won't affect any turning movements. Mr. Dinklage raised the question of the parking shortfall. Mr. O'Leary said they are 45 spaces short but they comply with the 5 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: May 11, 1999 Agenda Items Date: April 19, 1999 GRAINGER TELECOMMUNICATIONS HUT - SHUNPIKE ROAD 1) Bituminous sidewalk should have a minimum 8 inch gravel base. 2) Telephone service vehicles shall not park on Shunpike Road but use Grainger parking lot when servicing the hut. OIL "N" GO - MARK HILL OWNER, SHELBURNE ROAD 1) The entrance drive shall be constructed so as to conform to the Shelburne Road proposed widening. 2) Shelburne Road is State maintained and a road opening permit will have to be obtained from them. LARKIN REALTY - 388 - 400 SHELBURNE ROAD - SITE PLAN 1. Shelburne Road is in the City of Burlington and any work in the street right of way will require a permit from the City. 2. Water and sewer services serving the proposed building should be shown on the plan also storm drainage from the site. PINNACLE ( SPEAR ASSOCIATES - LOT 31 PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT -PINNACLE DRIVE Property line adjustment plot plan prepared by Llewellyn, Inc., dated 3/31/99 is acceptable. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: May H , 1999 agenda items Date: April 14, 1999 1) NET & T 140 Shunpike Road Acceptable 2) John Larkin, Inc. 388 - 400 Shelburne Road The building should be sprinklered 3) Mark Hill 1691 Shelburne Road The building should be sprinklered 4) Todd & Maureen Wulfson Pinnacle @ Spear Acceptable Dated 3/23/99 Dated 3/4/99 Dated 3/26/99 Dated 4/8/99 PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ❖ Planners ❖ Landscape Architects •A Surveyors TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 29 1999 TO: Joe Weith City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05403 FAX NO: FROM: Doug Webel-�o PROJECT NO. 7445 LOCATION: PHONE NUMBER: (802) 658-5588 FAX NUMBER: (802) 658-3629 ATTACHED: letter and preliminary plans from GMP ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Joe, Please call if you have any questions Thank you 50 Joy Drive * P.O. Box 2225 - South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 o Fax (802) 658-3629 fi email: pinkengr@aol.com GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE • P.O. Box 486 • MONTPELIER, VT 05602-0486 • PHONE (802) 223-5235 • FAX (802) 229-7814 Scott M Fraser Technical Assistant A, Engineering Doug Webber Pinkham Engineering Assoc. Inc. 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Doug; JUL 2. Direct Dial Number: (802)229-7982 Internet: fraser@gmpvt.com 7/23/1999 Please find enclosed a copy of our print NO. 32G4 OVERHEAD, SHELBURNE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION. I have hand drawn a few options that may meet your needs. Following are some specific issues that we will need to address should your client wish to locate the line on his property: • GMP will require an easement for the construction and maintenance of which ever option is requested. The easement will be 25' wide with a bump out for the bisector guy (if used). • We would like to be a minimum of two feet from the edge of pavement to the face of the pole. • If a third party request is made prior to GMP's scheduled relocation of the lines, the cost of relocating will be born by the requesting party. The same will be true if the request is made after we have completed the relocation. In either case GMP will relocate the line in compliance with the State's proposed road reconstruction. • GMP would advise your client to complete his electrical service design and negotiations with the adjacent property owner prior to requesting a design change. It is possible that either of these issues will dictate a specific design approach. I hope this information is helpful. Please call me with any further questions. Sincerely; Scott M Fraser C.C.: Dave Murray, GMP Colchester. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Raymond Belair Zoning Administrator June 1, 1999 Jeremy Farkas, Esq. Burak Anderson & Melloni PLC P.O. Box 787 Burlington, VT 05402-0787 Re: 1691 Shelburne Road/Non-Enforcement Of Subdivision Regulations Upon Public Taking Dear Mr. Farkas; You have inquired whether the City of South Burlington Zoning Department takes the view that "land development" (within the meaning of 24 V.S.A. § 4303) requiring a permit (as set forth in 24 V.S.A. § 4443) occurs upon a "taking" of private property by a government entity. I am writing to confirm that (a) the South Burlington Zoning Department maintains that "land development" does not occur in such an instance, (b) the Zoning Department does not require a permit upon the "taking" of private property by a government entity despite the fact the taking technically results in the creation of two parcels, and (c) it has been and continues to be our policy not to enforce the City's zoning and subdivision regulations in such an instance. Accordingly, it is my view as the Zoning Administrator for the City of South Burlington that it is not necessary to obtain a subdivision permit for the property known as and numbered 1691 Shelburne Road in connection with the conveyance of a strip of property by Albert J and Rita J. Reyes to the State of Vermont for the purpose of widening State Highway 7 as part of Highway Project Shelburne —South Burlington NH EGC FEGC 019-4(19), as documented in a Warranty Deed dated January 21, 1999 and recorded in Book 446, Page 105 of the land records of the City of South Burlington. Very ly y urs, aymo d Belair Zoning Administrator S:\Client Matters\71861\L.etters\ZoninBl.etta.doc BURAK ANDERSON MELLONI ,i,c, Counsellors at Law .qr. Raymond Belair Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Michael L. Burak° Jon Anderson Thomas R. Mellon* Brian J. Sullivant Daniel A. Seff° Lori J. Lewis" Michael B. Rosenberg* Of Counsel *Also admitted in New York tAlso admitted in Illinois oAlso admitted in Virginia and the District of Columbia June 1, 1999 Gateway Square • 30 Main Street Post Office Box 787 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0787 Phone: 802 862-0500 Fax 802 862-8176 e-mail: attorney@vtlawl.com www.vtlawl.com Montpelier Office: 74 East State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05602 802 229.0466 Re: 1691 Shelburne Road/Non-Enforcement Of Subdivision Regulations Upon Public Taking Dear Mr. Belair; As we discussed, I have enclosed a letter written from you to me stating that the City of South Burlington does not enforce its subdivision regulations as they relate to a subdivision created by a governmental taking of property, and that the City will not enforce those regulations as they pertain to a taking by the State of Vermont Agency of Transportation of a strip of land adjacent to, and formerly part of, the parcel known as and numbered 1691 Shelburne Road. If you find the enclosed letter satisfactory, please sign it and return it to me in the envelope provided at your earliest convenience. If you have any objections to the content or wording of the letter, please let me know and I will re -draft the letter to your satisfaction. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Please call me with any questions or comments. Enclosure. SAClient Matters\71861\LettersU1F Belair.doc Very truly yours, (/ Jeremy Farkas Recycled Paper llv�mqy?q- 5/1V99 MOTION OF APPROVAL MARK RTLL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mark Hill to construct a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Overall Site Plan Oil'N' Go Mark Hill - Owner Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc., dated 3/26/99, last revised on 4/21/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director (hereinafter Director) prior to issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to move the curb cut approximately 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. b) The site plan shall be revised to add one (1) additional parking space. 3) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the auto service and repair building will generate 51.36 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4) All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director prior to installation. 5) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5250 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6) The Planning Commission approves a sewer allocation of 125 gpd. The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued and the building can not be occupied until such time as sewer capacity is available. 7) The building shall be sprinklered. 8) In order to promote safe access along this high volume roadway, the Commission shall require this property and the property to the south to be served by one shared curb -cut to Shelburne Road. This shared curb -cut shall straddle the property line between these two properties and shall be constructed when the property to the south receives site plan approval for a new or expanded use. At the time this shared access is constructed, the property owner of this property (1691 Shelburne Road) shall reduce the size of his/her curb cut a sufficient amount to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 3161feet. 9) Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall record a legal document approved by the City Attorney providing a mutual access easement to the southerly property owner. 10) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 11) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the building. 12) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. May 11 - motions 2 \bDtlat 66' \ ` NIF 1` ACCGYP F /y✓� ���\� Shearer Chevrolet , l 1 / Po-d Parking Lot (//� r Ez/sting ! Hydrant cir J - _ \ — ssrb — , -------------- ---_----------- o<k ` ---- I -- — '.`.. "�' .� .- -�� _ - � - -------- $WALE / — r .� _________ - - _ aG ao, VOMM a- SHALE 50 yam-- I AP PLAN /i _ srAxes/H.AtE IIM. / 146 / l / 18Af-RR olfxt.AP tvrxs J ` Top -� - - / J M 36' Cottonwood 1 or 146f4e// r % ' / O% Jr r E7evotlon-15060' —� 1/ 1 1\ 1\ �Flpproxinate Location i T �FOOM / _ - ! ! / / .• Edge of Mbtlwd BY / % 1 i /� (Typ•) 1 / / Wayrrr. H.MdW k No `' 1 % CB r3 88 3 G + � -___ � J dam. MAY ".ES satere ME aPaev s' wro onreao oxawo \ / 14&0 RAMP) + sw + / / ' / / a BALlm HAY o>4 sertzAW >BOAIoI[ S _ J \ 44 GJ 175 wAsrAt'ru NAta^E 7CP tY' Li9M /4Q0 / __='` - __ ___- >_= 1!4L6 / _- -- 1 rra�. u PNs-onsr-rrs r110UNim� • _/ / F 144 \ N -_'__-_>_____ _ _ _ dC 3nom Lie= ZZ SAL t1t1' O.Q. *(ppyDm LOCA710M='==_s===r=`-=___===_=s#==='`__-_===s='_` FFIICE! +ihRANT man 7 70 ' _ _ / � =_s / / KEY M. sM unN NAME ` enMMat NAME arse 1 TO = -- -_- -_-_ c-`=`=__=_- =5_- AC r s-e re Amaw�mtq -d-' r e sr,n.e.Tr e t a LOCATgl+ / AP s re- �r�• a,. p ) n e i e TAPPNO cA i a��N. 0- � � �� a & e _ + / ..'�v \ _, l Manhole Y� u s rs-24' comynw. aiear. D i awe + \ G}y \ / Rkn 152.89 / RAP to i"'er —r A A Or a PA Inv. t46.28 / S9 J 1-1-fe . bmdda RoM i'qm visa 2 pd. lnv. 146.24 ,/ ts ro is --4i' en. wteA. MAre �,�<.s a e ►;NV.+461 1F p I w r s-s' M non d,torun Am.,-d Mb— ` `••` -- D-Ir arrewTk.. NIF ! • . _ - ! / / / D'e o a&A fd rw °Rw" ../a"e. A atr or s« m er.N a 1 .t Re S / 4 ��` / // j am :.' 4.e �+ �t root M• of d.tw.' nwu.mo w ab � b- nbw pvovd b ft .pd&.ry prmh t — -d .y -t. t -fr.Ar.Ry dAW er ft. x.a•..a..rry f.- r. ra.n. +er .nor eeeay aq seti at r-myo�-xZ�nu�.-Ann ua. e. p.b, ro u,..te�e or myom,o,.ertd.. S..iWn. ARoed fah YOnl. tk+rb«for b to b d .wk .w4l N. VAOT ROW `� -�/! / Parki.g . ,� --�-_` l / .Rn tn. aYbtef r/s.ra'tottn+ Asnhbnvh. at esa-raga tot 1 R b n.t.d th.t no .R0 owr.nwt of harrdw. r emr wh matrAd. hw b- mad. and PEA e y m.t.la - are4te— d t r .wt o.. mb m I. Th. C-6-1r .W 6. k—d n, th..anr to a Pr/m..4 -d .nr W w+.-d t. h.MI. . _ = cruaaan of A..ur-o. ` ` i� /r/ / l gl! I'/` /l a.ta rbP•w�Ay .., ta1- Ram a as r }road »aPf er w Am.rt .�e RR. R.r..' by PEA e' X e' ff al GKY. R9iE ME4140. Th. r *WWy wbl-4 D m%-tka — corpW d by Nair. N.M-w r N.y.� dat.d JO' NCH AhD atAVED 1 ffiON �� \ GRADE. Nvacm ro sTm. srAAES NIF ta.t...er r ro ..,ear .v ...x.. oa,ew m«..� v„r ro th..ar w .o,.w.taa er.d per _ State Of Vermont 8 '\ �' l j eNREn ro Mft TD aE MAR GRAPHIC SCALE � �� ! / _ / / 7 F• � IED � �r � �•r � � wa+ ,� Np«a ...a r.d -AM t.....ra aR APPROIED EMAL ' ` \ -'!~ / i art .M a fo RM J - 1. t.'F U.. art. taw •r awe..d .ard - r Ma.t. w••tr yb. R. sN .t-ipf ar.o. rwt h... rt R., w r hay aw dm. h plow plf ' to Pr.wp -y .ea J --' l / j APR n ra $.. 9.0 t fw PI- 4M d IN 7w) l J A R 2 � � i i � t1. At o r..e.e .or e....dw -d mvoy.d .r hh -. -A at aw w.Av .RR m. 30. N r-r/z• ro z-t/2'� a.�, t t-h - so n_ ` �l Red Fw 1 0 III Pr.-M Ry.p.r of So. Bur(irIatllq ; xK.�ga.. Ip ..d.ae./TODO.E .� asx-=na re.o� 2A' Mart. ao.r J I eT HW* .d 6-tpm fxmR FA8W ro BE a/FRA $0, IML R. u' S1 d . e M./OW of SAE fi / ( BaOROelm �� 1 I s � � � / % / AEIrSFD4WIF[LgITR]VAA.lMRlfY.tFNeK' *�s/isW r.?r nn ace aeaWO I t� = at� / acre 1Airwr AS PARA AT 7PEA SITE AND GRADING PLAN WSTA/L SIT ft]IC'fS OF5 a° IMROTEC{ID AQ'Es AND t1eL � ro OOMOtYPS AS POSSO E aRVE THE ENDS Pr RE FENCE I.P WM THE ! / &ME ROADIE SE MOff *V4 ACOW"7W ro HALF UE HE WT nF THE PLAN j� e� / _ / FFNCE COVINAMM WtAU RISTAU ST FOJCES AT OE TOE OF ALL PAONDE SOD MIEN lV¢OTRY rS / DAW Ra (� ' fAlf 1...) arSw e r Q4AM9VG NL2 FLIM OR W~IECTED 9LOM MAIM DO&W CW.SiRUCTILML NOT anuTEtP R+AH a f7/SEC aR _- / awsN OIL N GO SHEET tsC ESSA WL RDIECTED aV FWAL PLAYS $I r FIN= ARE M 9E maim Na Lr otca z sots ARE MAWTARlD I1N7R. SEa-ES ARE SIAtQ= AND RMAW ➢f ARagwTY a PROIWE APtiiLR4RATE mANSTrw HER7tEFTl STARLPM oftwNTERM _� NPN PBUMM E'NGMXMG ASSOCIATES. INC. � p {`-'gyp 2 OF 3 7W CMnt4C= COVSTRN:TIaV ORROM Aw Pletyc as _ / Mf'1f\K HILL—Qn„�P� 6�A111A DITQB TYPICAL / o J pr 50 • Joy D • e . P.O.Box 2225 et.T.; Ni. Nrs / MCA, Scvth Brlut8 . P.5 222ti �Q fRlM6 +•-2W »oa yr Dts4o'T-2226 souTH E1lJR1.UiCTON, vE�neONT [7!4!Z5 Vermo GRAPHIC SCALE PEA ASIw p DAw IMAVV (d MT) NPN I I-h . 40 m Maw- KWP .iG1[6 W*(a*W mr maw�m Wpan qlw.., •A.... • llwilW,Y..pµO -Ar11- 50 Joy Drtro . P.O. Doi RW South BMUDStM VT 05407-9= OVERALL SITE PLAN 3/2 ft NW AV OB. 'N' GO AW SHEIV MARK HILL —OWNER I OF 3 9F08URNE RW A%%Ecr#a souTM wm4NOTON, vmvw — 7445 I STATE cwo SHEARER, "N F. 1 VT. 1 I '1 ' 1 REYES, ALBERT ✓. & R/TA ✓. ', STALE' 01F V£RMONT I i Bit. Conc. o I II li I 1 o 2 1 /2 Sty I I I 3" - 10' r ; I I Wood Frame I I I Mixed Hardwoods Z Dwlg. I I -STONE F/LL Y-10 Y-1 p N i j I TYPE l I Y_7 .-,4'Wi1 ow - ------ No O Y_3 �I # 169J i 12 4pple — Y-B Chimney E313 900 8'Birch 147.50' 147.25' 147.00' MH ', Gravel I PROPOSED R.0..W. �- - - -- -- �% 2"Locusts - o o - - Stone Woll _ _, - R.O.W. EX/S77NG - h 'Coast WO- Wall b rn - - - - - - - Broken `, Mail„Bo Water Valve 30"Poplar; �o SMH�163 r7 M S1�y OH - Pole�1113 S H#65-5'V- joleg112 --- - - r S Po1e;M59-01/111 - - l5MH 164 _ Polely136710 - yj -- �Polek109 N ' H — T Sin Undg. Tale. Morker----�- _—� . - -- - (Underground Teie.) 3 noble Guard Roil - - -- 1 —'moo Sign N '° -------- - - -- ---------- --_- - ^ - - N OI \ ---------- — — — — — Z z In 395 I 396 \ N 4 47 44 " E 397 398 z z394 w U.S. ROUTE 7 Conc.\\O SHELBURNE ROAD----------Y-e r z p -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- ----- - -.--- -- -- # --- - Poie 4 SMH 5-1 Water Valves -�. ---- ------Bit. I� '1 -, -- -------- \ \------------------- -- - ------- 3 Cable Guard Rail -- ------ NI - --- Q Z a CH Post T• SI n e TITS\ a ---'---- --- -- -, OFi� --- -. uv _ Sin ole/j _ Ira ~I Water I Valve -- H 30"Maple - Sign t Sign - - Post 1 Siyn Base '-EX/STING R.O. W. Conc( - �l iqn. - ter.' -. G° Planter- S \ I `/ o \ oGr. Lights -.. � Woods & Brush Tr�7— Lamp Post 0Lamp 'Planter Post \ J / __-_---------_- D97 / \ sign I " 1 1' Y-4 Mail Box e`' I � \ a Gos Valve t �, ' 10 Apple 3 f CedarShrubs� �" V� \ f 1 \ Y-S \ \ 70700 r I � 14720' $i 146.25 �, �A— . \ Lame D01 - - - \i \ -�, 145 n v ' Bit. Conc. LARKIN, OHN P. & TARRANT, RICHARD E. & _ HOEHL, OIBERT H. I II Eat 4,i -- u o #1720 II cn i) O 0 2 1/2 Sty. Brick Building II (What's Your Beet 11) II I 1 DATUM LVERTICAL NGVD 1929 HORIZONTAL NAD 1927 \\ Post I ; �a I , REMOVE EXIS771VG DRIVEWAY \ MATERIAL, R£GRADE, PLACE I I 4 " TOPSOIL SEED \ II I o 1 1 ISI �� I I 1 I ro 1 I m 1 � I \ I ✓OHN LARKIN, INC; R£T, INC. & RHH, INC. PIL '-S1LWE FILL 7YPE / O '7jj O E `` n .0 o 0 3a PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK - 5- I 393+00 - 394+05 RT 394+54 - 395+85 RT 396+23 - 399+00 RT 393+00 - 394-F05 LT 394+54 - 399+00 LT P�[ PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK - 5- (MEDIAN WIDTH 4-6 FT.) 393+00 TO 394+35 co R£/CHEL T, KURT V. [/ ' DEMOLITION do DISPOSAL OF: P ORTLAND CEMENT D81 O 395+80, RT ON TE SIDEWALK - 8' TO 3%+20. RT (POST, SIGN BASE R 2 GLs) D97 O 394+05, RT 394+05 - 394+54 RT TO 394+50. RT (2 SIGNS) 395+85 - 396+23 RT 394+05 - 394+54 LT CONSTRUCT DRIVE SHELBURNE - SOUTH BURLINGTON 394+29 RT - 35' 394+29 LT 35' SURVEYED BY V_S.C_ INC. DATE 395+92 1 - 24' DRAWN BY E.A.A. INC- DATE LT - 16' 5+35 LT - 16 TRACED BY E.A.A. INC. DATE — PROJECT PROJECT F-EGC-019-4(19) A N T PLAN DRAWING NO. 27 0 20 40 SHEET NO. OF Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1999 agenda items May 7, 1999 Page 2 5) MARK HILL - AUTO SERVICE & REPAIR - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 3295 square foot building for auto service and repair. The Commission approved a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility on 7/26/94 on this lot which was never constructed. The ZBA on 4/26/99 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the proposed use. This property located at 1691 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District and the Conservation & Open Space District. It is bounded on the north by an auto dealership, on the east by Shelburne Road, on the south by two (2) residences, and on the west by the railroad. Access/circulation: The applicant is proposing a 36 foot curb cut, 20 feet to the north of the south boundary. Staff recommends that the curb cut be moved 20 feet to the south to abut the south boundary. This would allow for a shared curb cut with the property to the south. Staff recommends a condition that requires the applicant to reduce the size of his curb cut when the property owner to the south constructs his curb and to create a shared curb cut with a maximum width of 36 feet. The condition should include a provision requiring the applicant to provide a mutual access easement to southerly property owner. The VT AOT has also recommended one shared curb cut for the two parcels. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 27.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parkiniz: A total of 16 spaces are required and 15 spaces are provided including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack. Parking proposed is one (1) space or 6.3% short of the requirement. Applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $5250 which is being met. Proposed plantings include Serviceberry, Maple, Birch, Dogwood, Burring Bush, Juniper, Spirea, Arborvitae and Viburnum. Ord Memorandum - Planning May 11, 1999 agenda items May 7, 1999 Page 3 C.O. District: A portion of the property which lies along two (2) drainageways is within the C.O. District. The proposed development will not encroach into this C.O. District. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District BBW)- This property lies within the BBW District. The applicant has provided Heindel and Noyes the information needed to include the development in the City's hydrology computer model. The plan includes the stormwater detention basin required by the model. Sewer: The sewer allocation requested is 125 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting lit until such time as capacity is available. Staff recommends a condition that a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance not be issued and the building not being used until the sewer capacity is available. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 182 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates that the proposed use will generate 51.36 vte's. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $11,500. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area is provided. Lighting: Exterior lighting will consist of the following: six (6) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. 6) DORSET SQUARE ASSOCIATES - ADD RETAIL BUILDING - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project was continued from the 1/26/99 meeting (minutes enclosed) and subsequently continued to the 2/3 and 3/23 meetings to give the applicant an opportunity to discuss with the City Council relocating the proposed City street along the easterly boundary. The City Council supports shifting the planned r.o.w. location. The plan showing the relocated no.w. will be presented at Tuesday's meeting. 3 f � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 7, 1999 Michael Dugan 25 Pinecrest Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Auto Service & Repair, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Dugan. - Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 11, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: Applicants/Project F' es From: Raymond J. Belair, oning & Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary comments, May 1 1 , 1998 agenda items Date: April 13, 1999 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY - TELECOMMUNICATIONS HUT - SITE PLAN — plan should show a bike rack as was previously approved. — if there will be a light on the building, submit details (cut -sheets). MARK HILL - AUTO SERVICE & REPAIR - SITE PLAN 4.t, . ' ' 1 ,a..,,.,..-- ♦ t.,�oA 1.,,;IA; . ♦ 'o QG11G1) hi h ie nn4 h inrs uic minimum 1anua%1aP1116 r equir emen*L, vaseu on vuuuiug costs, io .v-� - `v'Ju,c,. u v,. ve 'b met. Proposed landscaping is $2614 short of this requirement. Plan should be revised to add more landscaping to meet the requirement. Staff recommends adding at least four (4) street trees along the front with a minimum size of 2 1/2" caliper. plan should show the Conservation and Open Space District boundary which extends 50 feet either side of the north and south branches of Bartlett Brook. = provide square footage of retail floor area (if any) and the number of service bays. provide additional information regarding building mounted light (cut -sheet). Light must be downcasting and shielded. dumpster should be screened from the property to the north. provide sewer allocation request. Applicant should be aware that there is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. It has been the Commission's policy to allow construction to begin in this situation but that occupancy can not occur until the reserve capacity is available. this property is located in the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District (BBW). Applicant must submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. The recommendations from Heindel and Noyes must be incorporated into the plan. staff recommends that the applicant record a mutual access agreement in which the applicant Preliminary Memo - Planning May 11, 1999 agenda items April 13, 1999 Page 2 would agree to grant access to his property from the property to the north and to the property to the south if and when the applicant is granted access to these properties. Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to require J . access to abutting properties to improve general access and circulation in the area. applicant should be aware that the traffic impact fee is approximately $11,500. —' the plan should be revised to incorporate the VAOT's recommendation regarding shared access with the property to the south. TODD & MAUREEN WULFSON TRUSTEES - BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT - REVISED FINAL PLAT staff recommends that this plat be revised to show the new lot line and the old line to be dissolved, instead of creating a new substandard lot (lot 31A). It is not clear that the intent is to merge lot 31 A with lot 31. plan should be revised to note that the old property line is to be dissolved. a legal document should be recorded prior to recording the final plat plan which indicates that lots #31 and 31 A are to be merged. 24 V.S.A. S4416, and (ix) the lots depicted on said Amended Plat have been and shall continue to be subject to the all of the conditions and restrictions contained in the final plat approval which conditions and restrictions shall run with said land and be binding upon, the CUrreht owners thereof and their respective successors, heirs, and assigns, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington planning Commission. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this day of _, 1999. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION chair 8:x.151. SEA 3 50 'd ZSKHHOS 'ON XVd Od NROIZII 3M 73ZIliS WV W01 Eli 6661-6Z-3dV ass L EGEND n Ra! John / Shearer Vol 118, Page 463 0 3/4' '0/a. Iron pipe set 1' .0/0, Iron pipe found 0 4' Sq, concre to monument Found A t Tra verse s to t/on Soil Boring ® re--, t p/ t I✓o ven ware fenccel/ne poor coed, Stonewall — — Edge of travelled way -� — Proper ty L /ne o Ut///ty pole w/ overhead w/res k% tlond bounaaary - see No to 4 ftAft o a d.� d �.. Vo( ,` age 12, �Pe�ycos ana, ftft mom "ft. to G'GI(y�e�, r N/ r.'.,o !'>nd •` #1651 - 3,77 Acres ona' Pi to ,, peye S Vol 180, Page 314 Vol 108, Page 2'?,q sewer �+anh�vle - typal / I the sho a(Dd area Allustra tes the 8.5' IPA* s trio of lava' can veyed the Reyes to the Sto to of Vermon t on 2! ..laa l999 for h4ghray ProJpct `;- �nj IW r6c ffGc 019-4rlR) For- ttds 0Ad I I assonh tee pel-Mnent and MAPOeV,- r ris rnnveyed see Curranty 6-ey rPcara(d .n Volume 444 pc9e lo5 A:-�'~ N 74'05 555" E 16.06' r� !� o a93 -lea, ✓, ,peyPs ,so4r„�,�r F Q� o� 6J ,9P 314 S`° � r r`�,�°s popE; �J c 9671 I to to of Ver/70n t Vol 180, Pope 517 Map Vol 80, Page 141 s of phys/ca( evidence found on c ted from deeds and other per - ten t with Title 27 t/.SA, Chapter VT L,S 5" 10© LSO ft hydrae t } et QR le i Rev�skan 64 aped Note S and Rte 7 tak*w area - 4W - 3/2/99. Re vww7 P ne wised L o t 2 Are ffeVA ft aabtld aMensAons - .4WH - n•trPlato ' Survey off' L aids of R o I' Ali rr;�.•` { Wber t J, and R to J, Reyes- F " n#1691 #1693 S1?&1burn& ROOd South Burt/Rg t v s_\ o2 Vermont Paoa Na 97579 1 Fa 14 (yam,. KNIGHT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC t wV�� P.U. BOX 29, VIL ISTEK VT„ 05495 - TEL 879-634 DATE, 10/28/98 DvM AWH cKD AWH �E, 1 " =50' L_ u v r-7 I .L 1 Bar t/Ptt Bay Rd. pc J Bear/ngs are based on Magnetic North 1998. C upland J 411 0 o 2�Q we t(and J9�? 66, P upland J8-306' N 8�''c2B 1 J0� 7e Ba ,-ery 4C-qu1s/ t/on Co. VC/ 288, Page 527 Ma,O Vo/' Zv'0 Page 53 NOTES 1. 4 hor/zon tat control t,-averse was conducted /n FPbrua ry 1998 us/ng a theodal/te, electron/c a%s tone r;e ter and steel tapes 2. Cer to/n sur vey da to shown hereon may vary frog recorded do to due to d11 f erences /n decl/na tio/t or/en to t/on or r e thods o f rgeo suremen t. 3, The parcel labelled #'1691 shown hereon was surveyed and monumen ted by Webs ter Mar t/!� Inc. /n surveys performed for No t/ona l L /fP Insurance Co. In 1959 and 1966. These surveys ore unrecordece, however, the, pro v/cled the measurements used /n the deed descrp t/on of th/s S the JnParer parcel. 4, The we tlands boundaries shown hereon were del/neo ted by He/noel and No /n Arcember 1997 They are prel/m/nary and subjec t to ro nor re vis/on of ter a follow-up /nvest/go t/on durOg the 1998 grow/ng season. 5. The Reyes parcels ore sub fec t to easement-5- and ogreemen is shown hereon as well as an easemen t benef/t t/ng the Sta to of Vernon t far slope and culvert roa/n tenance along a portion of the RtP 7 frontage as described 1n Vol cF4 Page 2,75. 6. Se vera l gaps /o verlops were o..sco versd be tween the deed and possess/on lhnes of #1693 and its aa',/o✓ners These dscrepanc%s have been resolved through legal Ins trumen is resin t/ng /n the property !,vies shown hereon, Th/s sur vey /s bo sed on c the ground and /nformo t/c t/nen t records Th/.s a t 1,7 ,, Sec t/ons 1401 - 1'4 6. ,4lber t SG 0 Sca (E PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ❖ Planners ❖ Landscape Architects ❖ Surveyors TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: May 25, 1999 TO: Eric Fontana Vt. Agency of Transportation 20 Kimball Avenue, Suite 303N South Burlington, Vt. 05403 FROM: Doug Weber PHONE NUMBER: (802) 658-5588 ATTACHED: Oil 'N' Go Sheet 2 of 3 - Site and Grading Plan ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Eric, PROJECT NO. 7445 FAX NUMBER: (802) 658-3629 Please review the attached plan, I have included the comments that you raised in your letter of May 11, 1999 to Joe Weith, the South Burlington Director of Planning and Zoning. Specifically, the drive access is now at the southern property line, the two proposed trees have been removed from the Shelburne Road Project limits of construction, and the parking area is now 30 feet from the proposed right of way. The relocation of the GMP utility pole is the last issue that needs to be resolved. Please let me know once a new location has been selected for this pole. Thank yo CC Mark Hill Joe YVeith Michael Dugan 50 Joy Drive •:• P.O. Box 2225 ¢• South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 :• Fax (802) 658-3629 •:• email: pinkengr@aol.com I3 URAh,,�t "ERSON 7ELI�OlVI PLf� Caoillisellors at)( my Joseph S. McLean, Esq. Stit,zel, Page & Fletcher, P.C, P.G. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 ,N1101Wd 1- 13UNW Jon .Andursoa Tlt(rnVIS It. Mc11Uoi' I3ri:In J. Sulli4;lnr 11;ildel A. Seff' Lori J. I.cmiti• Midt:tc] 11. Rosenberg* Of t:oun..40 Also ,jdutit((,d in \c)v iG)r1t iAl,o adndoutl in Illiuuis •Also admitted Iri 1"ir,t!ini;t :Ind dw Mmrict of ❑uhmthh July 14, 1999 t1.Ke11ny 5qunru • .10 Mum tree[ 1'u,t Offfc!c Aux 7•97 I;u7`li1]A161l, 1'crm0ut ()W-1-07h7 Niolwa 802 862.0SW 1:I.x N92 hfi:•'ii70 L'•4SAIfiI; :L(tUtYt(:y'��i'Ytii41P1.(!OI)1 tlorlircliarON;", U Fo.tSr;ljl jLrt'ut ►tuniruCur, V'rumet 03(,0; fun; 22Y4)16(1 Re: I -Appeal of Mark Hill and Albert 1, e. Rita J. ReyesEnvironmcri al Court Docket No. Dear Joe: Thanks for discussing the above -referenced appeal with me. From our conversation,1 understand that the Fire Chief worries about the time that would be needed for a sufficient number of trained full-time South Burlington firefighters to reach the new OWN Go building on Shelburne Road. Applicable building codes do not require the building to be sprinklered. Nevertheless, the Fire Chief believes a fire will do less damage while su1"Iicient personnel are traveling to the site if the building is sprinklered. To address this concern, Oil 'N Go provides the following information to you: 1. At its new building at 1691 Shelburne Road, Oil 'N Go will providc the following fire suppression features: a. OWN Go will have eight fire extinguishers. b. Oil'N Go waste and new oil storage system is up to National Fire code (see enclosed) and are double -walled. c, Building studs will be metal. d. Building will have four door exits as well as eight overhead doors. e, All other building materials will be fire rated. SDi7O 'd itce)'c'Ictl Pop, r ZSSEHH06 'ON XV.d 0d HH01,E1d 3OVd 743ZLIS WH 0111 AH111 6661-91-1117 Joseph S. McLean, Esq. BURAK ANDERSUN & EL1,01UJILC July 14, 1999 Page 2 2. The new nearby Sherwin-Williams building is not sprinklered. We see no reason for distinguishing between tyre two buildings based on the rationale outli.ied above. 3, Very few commercial areas in Vermont provide a level of fire protection approaching that offered by Aryouth Burlington. Becaugc' y„nct arPag hYS valuntoor fire departments, response tiries are much longer than those in South Burlington, If commercial buildings in those areas are not sprinklered, why is South Burlington so concerned to add yet an additional level of fire protection? 4. It is unclear to me that South Burlington has the authority to impose through site plan review a requirement for sprinklering. 24 V.S.A. § 4407(5) provides: In reviewing site plans, the planning commission or the development review board may impose appropriate conditions and safeguards with respect to: the adequacy of traff c access, circulation and parking; landscaping and screening; the protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources; and other matters specified in the bylaws, Clearly, sprinklering cannot b. required except if South Burlington bylaws specify site plan review for fir-, protection. Do they? I look forward to discussing this matter with you. J'TA\alw Enclosure SAClitnt Matters1719diVc�tcrsl;tametcan,do,; Very truly yours, Yn derson SOi`£0 'd ESSZHHH 'ON RE Od 83HOZ313 3Xd 73ZJTJS WV 11:11 f1HW 6661-r1-JIII' JUN-GN4-kj�3 11:d1 MARK HILL, INUGSTMENTS TEL:BU-060-2679- R;01 �pz -TpMo,I Wi fV06Ria To Whom It May Concern: h Concerning fire prevention for proposed Oil `N Go location 1691 Shelburne Road; I'd like to inform you of our proposed alternative to sprinkler system. L Oil 'N Go will have 8 fire extinguishers 2. Oil `N Go waste and new oil storage system is up to National Fire code (see enclosed) and are double - walled. 3. Building studs will be metal 4. Building will have 4 door exists as well as 8 overhead doors. 5. All other building materials will be fire rated. 90i�0 'd zGMH08 'ON kdd 0d NPO1 EI' SOU 7HIIIS lei I l : i 1 AH-1 6661-91-TI 9TIL1111 Lli[r TVU%ZLG %dII %JLVIirl! t: .7jfzs1G1II I(VIll tlVillIL.;Uv' used oil can be transferred directly from the collection drain to the storage tank. U 1.. #142 fisted 245-gallon double -Wall tal7k meets the specifications and the requirements of the L100tm Fire Code Section 79,105, OS well as NFPA 30. Other standard features L0,1-King ;oPrivily cover U. L.11sied, I, air -operated � -----' dlaphragM pump: 3o qpm f-0C78Clty. � awick a1scoonect .vuplor with drain caddy adapter kit. Manual air supply shut-off vervs, fC' z V4" inlot hoss. Outer tank provides 12,1% secondary Air Hookup & Vent openings 1 1/2' air supply hookUC 2. 2- vent opening 3, 4' vent opening 4. 2" opening into over tarok 5, 4" opening into outer tank Air filter/regulator. 2" czmtock Coupler snd dust covor for easy d1scharge. easy-Wrrad ligi,'id IvYQI gauge. Automatic alr shut-otl to prevent overfilling, Size; 40-W x 37-1/2,10 ,x fig-H Shipping Vit.; 1100 Lbs„ Man ufactured,,b y J®HNdow INDUSTRIES, INC. 120 E. 7uscarawas Avg. aalberton, Ohio �a2C3 For Additional Information, Phone Tall -Free 1-800-433,0708 I iatribufftd 4y, ;} 90/90 'd ESK0901K? 'ors H od a3HOJ313 3DVd 73Z1." Is �� �i I T t nh� e661-S "Er J2,41-24--99 11: 21 MARK HILL, INVESTMENTS TEI. i B02-E60-'2S?6- Jgr,NDow INDUSTRIES, INC. With the waste Oil Storage System from JohnDow, used oil can be transferred directly from the collection drain to the storage tank. U.L. #142listed 245-pallor, double -wall tank meets the spec" icati'oris and the requirements of the Uniform Fire Cade Section 79,105, as well as NFPA 5o. Other standard features include: LoCiting Socurity cover 0. L.11sted, I" sic -operated dtaphregrn pump: J0 gvtn capacity. Quick als=rrnect couptor with drain r caddy adapter kit. luanual air supply shut-off Valve, fC' z t4" lnlat hosa. Outcf tank provldfs 121% 96Condary contalnnr017f, , Air Hookup & Vent openings 1 1/2" air supply hookup 2 2" van! rpe;ii,nq 3, 4- vent opening d. ?" opening into ouler lank 5. 4' opening into cuter tank Ietri*Q194 Dy: Air filter/regurator. 2" carriock coupler and dust c-ovor for 603y disOharge, teay-to-read iiquid favel gaugor. Autdmatic alp shut-ott to prevent overfriling, Size, 40" W x 37-1l2"D X 69"H Shipping Wt.: 1100 Lbs. Man ufactured,.by: JoMaDow INDUSTRIES, INC. 120 E. 'ruscarawas Ave. Ba'ber{on, Ohio 442C3 For Additional Information, Phone Tall -Free 1-800-433-0708 arp E 30/S0 'd cSK099KK V1 M Od EHOEE I3 3lbd 713ZLiS WV -'131 ; I L AL 060 i-9l-Zf if CVu4-E, �u (nw�w, U�G VVY 5 �i? 4Gf6 * 83? FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS 6./ vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax p assessment) +°` units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION �P s . f . ( 5 ) TYPE OF USE G e ( 6 ) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) FORM AR-2 r COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (6) (7) $ 226.00 / vte S �• �/ vte I // 0 2, �4' �. 3 units (From Table ST-9) $ / unit CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) $ CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) $ (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE- CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ "� / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $_ (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN / unit $ /(/ rr UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) $ / unit FOAM MR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) / unit / unit / unit FORK AR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 ��/. units PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers + Planners :• Landscape Architects + Surveyors Oil ' N' Go Shelburne Road Landscaping Cost Estimate KEY QTY. COST EXT. AC 1 75.00 75.00 AP 9 126.00 1134.00 BP 1 89.00 89.00 CA 3 11.50 34.50 CB 1 18.50 18.50 EA 3 19.00 57.00 JC 10 12.50 125.00 RR 10 12.00 120.00 SB 3 11.00 33.00 SW 2 11.00 22.00 TO 24 19.90 477.60 VD 1 19.90 19.90 Total 2205.50 x 2.5 = $5,513.75 50 Joy Drive ❖ P.O. Box 2225 4- South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 oa Fax (802) 658-3629 4- email: pinkengr@aol.com NEW TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE KEY 0TY. NOTE.• HAY BALES SHALL BE EMBEDDED 4" INTO EXISTING GROUND BALED HAY OR STRAW EROSION CHECK DETAIL N. T. S. 250 WATT METAL HALIDE DOWNSHIELDED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT TYPICAL N.TS. PLANT SCHEDULE SIZE LAT7N NAME COMMON NAME MISC AC 1 5-6 ft. Amelanchier candensis Serviceberry B & B q-�-) AP 1 2-2 1/2" Acer platonoides Norway Maple B & B _ry - BP 1 8-10' Betulo papyrlfera White Birch B & Bjd_ CA J 18-24" Cornus albs elegantissima Variegated Red -Twigged Dogwood CB 1 5-6, Cornus baffle.) Red -Twigged Dogwood B & B EA J 18-24" Euonymus alotus Dwarf Winged Burning Bush C j JC J 15-18" Juniperus chinesis Seogreen Juniper 2 gal. RR 6 12-15" Rosa rugosa Rugoso Rose C(( SB J 15-18" Spirea x bumaldc Gold flame Spires 2 gal. SW 2 15-18" Spirea x bumolda Anthony Waterer Spirea 2 gal. e j TO 20 J-4' Thujo occidentolis Arborvitae B & B VD 1 4-5' Viburnam dentatum Arro ood Viburnam Design Qualilicotion This design is intended to be the best possible to meet existing City of South Burlington standards and regulations and the Environmental Protection Rules of the Agency of Natural Resources. No guarantee is made as to the ability of the system to be constructed, or to function as intended, unle; the some is constructed pursuant to plans of greater detail. Furthermore, this design has been prepared for the regulatory permit process and may not sufficiently detail all the items necessary for construction. Ib V, 3.5- PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ❖ Planners 4e Landscape Architects ❖ Surveyors TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: April 22, 1999 TO: Ray Belair, Assisatne Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of South Burlington 495 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05403 FAX NO: 860-2879 FROM: Doug Weber LOCATION: PHONE NUMBER: (802) 658-5588 ATTACHED: PROJECT NO. 7445 FAX NUMBER: (802) 658-3629 Landscaping Cost Estimate 5 sets of the following plans Sheet 1 of 3 - Overall Site Plan Sheet 2 of 3 - Site and Grading Plan Sheet 3 of 3 - Details 1 set of sheets 1 and 2, (11 x 17") ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Ray, Please call if you have any questions. cc: Mark Hill Michael Dugan 50 Joy Drive ? P.O. Box 2225 0 South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 4- Fax (802) 658-3629 %% email: pinkengr@aol.com Perimashield® Series Cutoff Luminaire The Perimashield luminaire is ideal for exterior wall and area lighting applications where sharp cutoff is required. This versatile fixture features adjustable cutoff from 70' to 90' to reduce light trespass and high angle glare. Lighting Applications The Perimashield Series is ideally suited for security lighting applications as well as commercial and architectural exterior wall and area lighting for parking lots, office building, stores, shopping centers, fast food restaurants, banks, warehouses, and parking garages. Front Access Lens/Door Assembly Removable, one piece, injection molded, UV stabilized polycarbonate door and clear lens for full front access. Interior door surface finished in bronze to protect paint from rocks or pellets. Rear Housing One piece, heavy duty, die cast for long life and cooler operation. Reflector Precision formed aluminum for optimum performance. Ballast Class H insulated, -40°F starting (-20°F for MH), 60 Hz HPF. An aluminum ballast compartment cover isolates electrical components from the optical assembly. ORDERING INFORMATION HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM SA• P NRTL/C Nationally recognized testing laboratory listed. Full compliance to both UL and CSA standards. For use in damp or wet locations Additional Features • Field adjustable socket for variable cutoff angle (70-90°) • Bronze Lektrocote® finish • Two 1/2" side entries for surface conduit mounting • Photocontrol mounts behind prismatic windows • Mounting bracket accessory for single and double pole mounted Perimaliter luminaires • Medium base socket (lamp included) PRS-0070S-118 70 Quad/AL (HPF) 18 8.2 PRS-0070S-511 70 120/Reactor (NPF) 18 8.2 PRS-010OS-118 100 Quad/AL (HPF) 19 8.6 PRS-010OS-511 100 120/Reactor (NPF) 19 8.6 PRS-0150S-118 150 Quad/AL (HPF) 20 9.1 PRS-015OS-511 150 120/Reactor (NPF) 20 9.1 METAL HALIDE PRS-0070H-118 70 Quad/PLA (HPF) 19 8.6 PRS-0100H-118 100 Quad/PLA (HPF) 20 9.1 PRS-0175H-118 175 Quad/PLA (HPF) 21 9.5 1. Lamp included. Note: For electrical data, see HID Ballast Data starting on page 521. For Tri-Tap (120, 277, 347V) change 8 to 6. For Quad -Tap ballasts 208 & 240V, not CSA. Accessories must be ordered separately. See Accessories. ACCESSORIES - Must be ordered separately Number •. FUSE-5A Single in -line 5A fuse and holder. FUSE-10A Single in -line 10A fuse and holder. PBT-1 Photocontrol, 120V. (PVL-PK wiring kit required.) PBT-234 Photocontrol, 208, 240, 277V. (If ordering, PVL-PK wiring kit also required.) PBT-6 Photocontrol 347V (PVL-PK wiring kit also required) PVL-PK . Gasket and wiring kit for photocontrol. (Photocontrol not included). Required when photocontrol is used. Aluminum slipfitter housing fits 2 3/8" OD tenon for single PVL-PT or back to back double, post -top mounted luminaires. Bronze Lektrocote finish. EPA: 1.8 sq. ft. with fixtures I A C PRS Series 14 1 /2" 1 14" 1 7 1 /8" 1 5 1 /2" 368 mm 1356 mm 1181 mm 1140 mm B H 1— C -� T o o D T E A1 PVL-PT 2-7/1 6" 2-1/2" 13-3/4" 13-1/4" 5" 62 mm 164 mm 1349 mm 1337 mm 1127 mm Hubbell Lighting, Inc. f' r AGF�CL- STATE OF VERMONT j AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building = Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 tiSp�R'CP April 7, 1999 Mr. Douglas Weber Pinkham Engineering Associates 50 Joy Drive, Post Office Box 2225 South Burlington, Vermont 05407 Subject: Oil 'N' Go - South Burlington, US 7 Dear Doug: I have reviewed your plan for the above -referenced project, as well as discussing it with both my superior and the Special Projects Unit, and I offer the following comments. We are obligated by Title 19 V.S.A. 1111 to "..impose reasonable conditions to reduce the number of accesses that will be required for the tract of land. These conditions may include a required setback of any construction or improvements from the highway to permit the construction of frontage road or roads, acceleration and deceleration lanes, and/or other areas for off -highway control and management of vehicles, and may require reimbursement for any costs to the state for the installation of traffic control devices or road improvements reasonably required because of the development and may permit or require integration of the access and on -site traffic control facilities and connection of frontage roads between contiguous tracts of land as development is occurring or may occur along the highway. " In this case, the best way to comply with this statute and our policies is to require one access to serve both your pracel and the adjacent parcel owned by the same party. I recommend you redesign the access to the Oil 'N' Go so that it is near the southerly property line. When the residential lot to the south changes use, we will require them to jointly use your drive so your deed should provide for joint use in the future. You should also incorporate our future project drainage into your plans so that the drive will be compatible with our design. Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. Douglas Weber Pinkham Engineering Associates Subject: Oil 'N' Go - South Burlington, US 7 April 7, 1999 Page Two I will await a revised plan before proceeding with your request for access. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call me at (802)828-2653. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities & Permits Unit 9Tuu cc: � Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Mark Hill, Mark Hill Investments __ - � i '''� Lbttc' 66" h'IF Sheerer Chevrolet ..,..m,�.-„„ _ k1l0 f 3tlffer / 140 TCP dr IAM 14L0 \\ /46 — 144 4� j wa xw.ec ........... 1 F t a M l NIF. Rey,; 11 I rA. 1FR FABRIC 11,1WEV IW OO D T7 NE571, P7 w WRAF 1,V, Orr APPROWO COUAL --r7iW FAPRtC rO 9E15 '&T. flF..Olt a'Yt.6'1t T,MAhra$ 0 S' m f0' O.C. +t2 01157AU St Mr -CS AT 7CLS CT'uHP?trii£c'f£+v Sil#WS NCI AS PaRN.i_C M. CMT,Ui' VS AS POS96U -LW r WE EKC_ OF ?W FOK£ UP N110 YW S't1Rd•'. REMOVE SjDA4fW NTEtl A CtA 0AXD TO HALF TAE HEYOT OF *W tF/aC.E, CM,X4CW W4U INSTALL SK �Pk S AT THE TX W A4: 'air tW tWFR07ECW "xCPES CAEA•EO !%.PMi CEatSrRr�iRAN. AVT N£CVM" RXY RIP-MI£y ON iYNAi PUNS 5XT, FUMES .ARE T6 9E AfA#v TA.%Sr Lw?t S.CWES ARE STASUM ANn RWWAPN W PROPV?,Y Or THE l_Cwp:ACyM r T3 0 Paved Ptxkhng Lot / rfi ! f f ! lr i'?" f WW00I111771�v11 � / € a f 710 / Rif51.69 fnv.m 146.1R NM. 14L3 Existing Porkin4 "`►fir` �. � \ / 1 e\°"7 '*• ` `' ` arm •.......-.i \ � F1r / f � ;, !! !'l! NIF State Of Vermont GRAP111C ;SCALE a''* f-fi T" l07-ri T" A tacD PO ft �' g � / 50' AHC ,jPu�!c kODN! !W ! i b ECf5;9dG cr o hu nm4 € E PROWW APPRO i'A7£ ?PANSf7AYd 8£Ttb7.27f SIAevm rAITr'MNCE AN, 'taWC R.O.W. OR }f / ! AS AP AS APPRa'X RfA7E W � r MffN it ! ! OK -A E M 4FECCCR a^JxJ,rFR iNAN 5 fT,fSEC HMY hE".£ S.°X-5 ARE RE .% ! a'F M-MIN &M .T frrpp , Ai 7a to if / Existing NydTrnrt J swA1E m•ac OF SWA. (AY m STRAW I FIAN taw ,,—T 2Wl,,r SPA ESIVAlE �1G HAY BALE" WAU SE DANDM 4" AM DOSING CYt W �� gam* � �sf♦� IQ�tO� 25L' MATT PE'TAi MALE �a Tx eNT SC.: rrnu= 1QY 01Y am LAIN MAW ;iNlAlrh+ b.WF W AC 1 s-e 2 Am Ma Mx .:,r Obls+E 5a .O,xry R # a AP I &•rC/r trao4rt—mw Maa r wore i 8 PaPylNyu Mdtn RA-ab & & P CA J /8-T4" Co— ado alepm+i,sawiP Vod.Qetad Rea+ rigged tkgenai Co T Se' C'anas Iwf.J RM-7w51ga; Ocgwao.+ P d a EA J 18-24' 4:lnnprxfa oratua Owo'! WAI, a &—wV 5',- X J 0-18' A. !W R fT-16• Raro 1•ugoerl l upa RowcY*x sw 5 M_rr .SPbM x 6—,w C,,M FMma Ipk- SM 2 1'J-1!" SO-x !rv>M.lbr Ant any W,!— 5i, o Z jo. 1p 20 _-4• mep o.xldmtdo, ArcoMrw t? ,k 6 l0 1 4-d' 4*,_ d.ctotu,f Mrc 1 yNa.no» Thla dealyn M irctndM to be tfra taaf P—tio td meat .H&UV Cry c1 South !kpJ)cpf-r, a1Pf11Td5' and-g—A.tA end th. Eofenrn.ntd Pmt*ctfal RWu of fh. AWey of Nature R.erora.a. No OL—e.e ;r mode oa to the Q4rtyof the rpt— 1e 1x eanabefefad, .r to A—li- as Mfa•,eMe; wx.es th. aom. N aanat—W pw^x+ot 1. PA-, of greater 400 .40Ifr d.w'QI hoe beef P.q 1 kr eh. ,"--?k y P—lil waxes -d may —f -lftN ej, data2 ms !r.: ,terra nc.'esa a y r r�atwc 1. Canb,xtcr eh on _Wy 0,9 Soft at f-WO-M-4977 45 ho— PrAIr to tl itRt of my c�»sWCG'on, 2. IN VAOT c­fJy P✓a an 'C ary:1!'. t anwo,wrxnfa to. the r-d-y m the �otbe SheNume Rood —,w- . yr rho Canhaior .. tc cardd+cl. on .u'* M. the VAOT ROW .16 Lh. PW-11C-f F.•vnrRu.-tet,'m Ad,iiS!lai for of ttU'-739P. S 7t 6< caf.d ,N,,at rw sf. or..sasm 4 of naardxfa afhg' .a.t. maMrlda ha+ hear rr.& a>d PEA tmi.n .ao rnma+srbY+ty .'or .may frdttiza/rt ar owMflb Pqt mnY .A.f m lP�ar ;dt.. A IT. Cartb'acfa- a".0 be .—.d for te.. aa* 10 b. pw-,W '.4. d ahaN [w Pr�.d to F .si, o CeT 16_f. c1 inrrdnae. d,tW ! A —a plm, _M4d i'4gportV of 4b�vf .rd R?ta R.tron• by PFA, 6. 7rN A'"—Y MtUMd D.6Nwrtla, m+ ca,µvWY.r by WI,_.. HaMdo &• nr.Yu, A t d LLown6n• l9317. 7 C:mlrocta' fa to A10d1 d1 _aim ca,hd .+:aa_wva. grin• to the afurf of courofneceor• and d1w NW.ci dW, md''40— o' q.'fy Pe needei d C.. cell and N aknas — fa fgfd Qr d., scan. toPac+. I mC mu"ch irmnKn2dy: :ae bt. mcMv or ,W__ .4.4 rn+ aW AV. grM. rsr t`,_ J n.+ 1. e. VA V Apft rB'an4 w A— of A- M Mi' tO o'P.n>a M .'+cev p'la to plfi{'hQ •1nY sa4t ?O. Ses * t f Fs P,_ 49-d !1. A. daboo'l be man be as.d.d afd .ht nrteh we .eels of Rma! autlnq wrth m. Aw. .:SA r:remn,g Red caaav fO-«J-.t0 20X :]'na;Fn n Psarnlc' kyes ttcs 15A1 Asm.d Ry p'ma .:ppxt O 5 Nua; i0."Y; a., 9Y 81 KwKA iW*y 3F ut4wc•.,a m a.=t'h!T'on Ex tN11te d 8 Seed ! 8 &a/1000 aE PEA ws. !a+tii cw-svu rAx r.¢t) ws-_ets--------_____._________'_. SITE AND GRAMGDMmm W_� D447 1 NO. 44741!!Y PI'�IiEIA![ E�'NaE'd '?',Ih1G tbS.Sf#f`iATi'Lt: 1N-C' �^ r?a cA e.N,a a °scwr.F m,.+..ec.'•.r w.,wox FN;:',,�4 3 SO Jay [}rise a F fJ_ b 22LdSHELBURNE MAD n, xz.- South EnrbMtonW ,.'...;? 1225 SOM BURUPOCTOK 7 icr • ��• t•�'� 1 , ,t ° °A VA \ 'It �f N/F Bouyea NIF 'hearer Chevrolet /J ,� i i ! i i f r/ It / r� � �r�-`�\� • 'rlyjtiii !i—=°°•er�� = -__�Mx�"'°m. I tt rtrirvaded,`tM-&k, ~,tdfitItIIlll 1 ,,��p�roof JYe7Jaod By /lll fit fit 1 / !one AAe+edd &Xslff I�IIliflf lft it fi ' ! ! \ }•f lY^ Lot T\\\\\\ / / // t Ncfes' 1.) £xfstrng topography was taken %am a plan entitled "Property of Ntert & Rita Rees by P.E.A, dated 12188. 2) The PreUmirary Worland Ds&2 eotlon was . mpleted by Wagner Nefnd d & Noye.% dated December 7997. N/F State Of Vermont GRAPHIC. SCALE ------------- e M FEW i /RECEIVI:Lj WAR c City of So, Burlington F'raparty Una — —scfback Line ■ �'--—Fence Lire — -- —W— --Water L'ne — —— —Sower Line —olE/ /-�- o,,head Efec./Ted. stream R,*raad Trm,*u Edge of weflanv O Manhole 0 Water Valve Af Utwity Pewe hydror, t O 1ighf Pale 0 concrete nlanut —f O lrcn Pl.e Lot Co✓eram 5ulldfngx 3,295 sf - a08 as .20Z ovema:t.• 16, 742 sf s a38 ac. m 10.3$ u ser 11L21, sf = 3i§ = = 877- Total: IffP,948 of r S72 ac. f00X Front .ard f'oreruae: Povemer". 3,363 sf - 0..O£ oc. » 257N Totai. 11,556 sf - 0.27 = 100% 1 DAW N M PI1KHAM E==_'a=11'd R;b3tr AS C,CIATES, I ik£+ �prbsrr^R.mmn's 'tmfi.; u.d-div]aeEr ^9v+w.rmx KwP 50 3on Orin® a p.0- Box 2288 f. South Euriingtoa, VT 01540 -2226 Afbsrf J. and Rita J. Reyes '693 Shelburne Road South Rvniagton, VT 05403 Aa1k snP Mark NNP 1233 Sheiburne Road South Bterwgtan, VT 05403 LeL Zoning Aistrlct: C-2 camn-ercla7 Budding I/"- AulamobAe Repair A Ser.,sc� sow 4295 sf OVERALL SITE PAN � MARK I 1 i-pw', 4�:li , rY(I 5d-YS-C� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER QF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 862- 5088 A40eW7-L/Z1ra REYcs _ /h�3 .5h4eZ.�IVW I6 rZa an _ ,So. /j✓0eGrA/% taAI, dr. D54a3 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) �� - 21978/8roo -ZB79 At44K 1414,G - /Z 3 3 -51A �uAd4-F A6�✓ - �o .,C3y16�-1'� MA4 Ar D 54-0 3 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) d 78�CbZy��Zb Gbh ZS A21A)EGXtST V2. &�-SS6-x �^ 1/7-- L1.5452 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: /64/ t)WUE Ro. --e. eeJeu )C,rt�cl, !Jt 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Ao7z) �VtC�S zA41A!OIZ 2E�',4i,p A! 6 ,r= �l_VO&WS47aS c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) ,IZ9S Ste' d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Z8' MA-X e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): O-EXeSr/�� 8 - F'2o%�sC7/ g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing 4 % Proposed O % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 0 % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing o % Proposed 2� 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ /7!5,- 04no .00 b) Landscaping: $ 5250 , 00 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): /00 1:t% b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out) 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: `5 Te, /5 TE. /0.'00 A -.cat --i z: oo PM 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: .--::FA--7VX ,0.* V 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: = r 00/ 111q 7 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. r SIGNATURE O PPLICAN DATE OF SUBMISSION REVIEW AUTHORITY SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line - ) / /� 6 /"" 0, 11 Planning Commission I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: (Apfrmsp) Director, Planning & Zoning Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning &Zoning or Designee ate PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers ❖ Planners •A Landscape Architects ❖ Surveyors TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: March 26, 1999 TO: Ray Belair, Assisatne Planning and Zoning Coordinator City of South Burlington 495 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05403 FAX NO: 860-2879 FROM: Doug Weberh�+. ,, — LOCATION: PHONE NUMBER: (802) 658-5588 ATTACHED: PROJECT NO. 7445 FAX NUMBER: (802) 658-3629 Landscaping Cost Estimate 13 sets of the following plans, (5 sets for Planning Commission, 8 sets for ZBA) Sheet 1 of 3 - Overall Site Plan Sheet 2 of 3 - Site and Grading Plan Sheet 3 of 3 - Details 1 set of sheets 1 and 2, (11 x 17") ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Ray, These plans are being submitted in conjunction with the Site Plan Application from Michael Dugan. Please call if you have any questions. cc: Mark Hill Michael Dugan 50 Joy Drive : P.O. Box 2225 0% South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 * Fax (802) 658-3629 •3 email: pinkengr®aol.com 1 PINKHAM ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers * Planners ❖ Landscape Architects :• Surveyors Oil ' N' Go Shelburne Road Landscaping Cost Estimate KEY QTY. COST EXT. LABOR STAKES AC 1 79.00 79.00 1 3 AP 1 125.00 125.00 1 3 BP 1 105.00 105.00 1 3 CA 3 14.90 44.70 1 CB 1 29.90 29.90 .5 EA 3 19.90 59.70 1 JC 3 12.50 37.50 1 RR 6 12.50 75.00 1.5 SB 3 12.50 37.50 1 SW 2 12.50 25.00 .75 TO 20 26.00 520.00 10 VD 1 29.90 29.90 .5 Plant Material Cost 1168.20 20.25 9 Tax 58.41 Trucking (12%) 140.18 Contractor Markup (1.3) 1518.66 Labor (23 @ 30.00) 690.00 Stakes (9 @ 3.00) 27.00 Amendments 100.00 Bark Mulch (3 yds. @ 30.00) 90.00 Total Planting Cost $2,624.25 Lawn (11,400 s.f. @ .25) $2,850.00 Total Landscaping Cost $5,474.25 50 Joy Drive et P.O. Box 2225 e• South Burlington, VT 05407-2225 Business (802) 658-5588 * Fax (802) 658-3629 A email: pinkengr@aol.com TITL.EL, PAGE, & FIETCIER, P. C. Al- ORNTEYS AT LAW 171 BATITRY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 )31JRT,1MTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STEVEN F...1TZEL AATTJ R. FAC:F " ROBMT &. FI.LTC7rRR V.:L'1'Ii S.I&LEAN TRv141HY A4 kX2Sr/'CE (-ALSO ADTd1= ]N N Y.) James E. Knapp, Esq. Gravel and Shea Po Box 369 Burlington, JET 05402--0369 (8n2)&S3,2555 (VO1C:E;T..CD) FA?({,8tl2}65D.2S52 E-MAILiF1iDA.i i i (�2'�AOL.00M) Decemher 7, 1998 RG: Reyes Property 1691-1693 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Jim: OF COUNSEL ARTHUx w mPxn51A I am writing to follow -yap an our prior conversations relative to tha above --referenced matter. Specifically, based on the information that you have provided to the City of South Burlington Department of Planning and 'Zoning by letters dated October 12 and November 9, 1993, it appears that the above - referenced property, owned by youz clients, constitutes separate lots under South Burlington Zoning Regulations, and may be developed as such. I hope this letter is responsive to your request. Please let me know if you have any questions, Sin re yrr Joseph S. McLean JSM/gmt cc: Joseph Wezth -KN3832,WCR M/EO 'd ME099E0P 'ON Xv3 33H0131E � 30Ed'713LI19 Wd LS:10 NOW 6661-LC-OEC CHARL S T. SHEA STEPHEN R. CRAMPTON STEWART H. MCCONAUGHY ROBERT B. HEMLEY WILLIAM G. POST, JR. CRAIG WEATHERLY JAMES E. KNAPP JOHN R. PONSETTO DENNIS R. PEARSON PETER S. ERLY ROBERT F O'NER.L MARGARET L. MON7GOMERY LUCY T BROWN STEPHEN P. MAGOWAN ERIK B. FITZPATRICK LEIGH POLK COLE ROBERT H. RUSHFORD Mr. Joseph Weith Director of City Planning City of South Burlington 511 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 GRAVEL AND SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW AREA CODE 802 76 ST PAUL STREET TELEPHONE 658-0220 FAX 658-1456 POST OFFICE BOX 369 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 CLARKE A. GRAVEL COUNSEL NORMAN WILLIAMS SPECIAL COUNSEL WRITER'S E-MAIL: October 12, 1998 JKNAPPCa GRAVSHEA.COM Re: Reyesperty. 1691-1693 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Joe: Thank you for taking the time to review the file on the above -referenced property regarding the status to the two lots. Although your file indicates by inference that the City continues to accept the two lots as separate lots, I am afraid we need a more formal determination to satisfy a potential buyer. Would you please review the chronology below, the proposed transaction and whatever information you have in your file and confirm that the City deems the two lots to be separate lots. For your convenience I have appended a very simple statement to the bottom of this letter confirming that based on what is in this letter, you in your capacity as the Planning Director agree that the two lots referenced above are separate lots. If you prefer some other method of indicating your ruling, that is fine too. Based on my understanding of the state of the title, Al and Rita Reyes acquired one property by deed from the Mables dated September 25, 1961. They acquired the second property by deed from the National Life Insurance Company dated July 8, 1968. As part of their estate planning, the Reyes transferred the two lots to Steve Crampton as a trustee to reconvey, then Mr. Crampton transferred the property back to the Reyes as tenants in common which occurred in November of 1976. 1 have enclosed copies of each of these deeds with this letter. Assuming that the two lots are deemed to be separate lots, and some other unrelated issues are resolved, the Reyes may desire to transfer both lots to a single purchaser. We would expect to use two deeds in order to maintain the distinction between the lots. If that deal does not work out, then there may be some alternative which would involve transferring the a lot to two separate buyers. GRAVEL AND SHEA Mr. Joseph Weith October 12, 1998 Page 2 If you feel you need more information to make a decision, please let me know what you need. Very truly yours, GRAVEL JEK:wra Enclosures Based upon the information provided in this correspondence, including the copies of the deeds and the statements in this letter, taken together with the information available in the files maintained by this office, and by our signature below, the Planning Department of the City of South Burlington confirms that the two lots referenced above are separate lots and may be conveyed to one buyer in separate deeds or to separate buyers and under either circumstance, the lots will remain as separate lots. Dated at South Burlington, this day of October, 1998. ON-� gGF�b STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATOR O� P.O. BOX 168 ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05453 tiSppR�P' 655-1580 September 15, 1998 Al Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Illegal Sign - So. Burlington - US 7 - MM 0.361t Dear Sir : Following a field inspection on Sept 14, 1998 along US 7, it was noted that there is a sign advertising "SALE OR LEASE" at the above referenced location. Following our phone conversation on Sept.15, you asked me for information about what size of sign you need to comply with the Vt. Statues. The maximum size is limited to 6 square ft.(2' by 3'). Our Sign Control Specialist is available -To answer specific questions you may have. He can be reached at 828-2651. Please keep in mind that the right-of-way extends 49.5' from the centerline and ends at the location of the existing sign. We ask that should you erect a new sign that you refrain from placing it in the right-of-way. If you have any questions or continents in regards to this letter please don't hesitate to contact the office at 655-1580. Sincerely, nA-- Trent W. Col.etta District Technician IV TWC:bm Town of So.Burlington Telecommunications Relay Service TTY/TDD 1-800-253-0191 N/F ALBERT & RJTA REYES STACK AREA In i / N/F VEFOAONT RAILWAY P WF N*ARER CHEVFOXr o, 07. , , , V• _ , , , , , , , , N/F BOUYEA rr-O-vi a EXIST. SHEARER CHEV. FARKNNO LOf J � < -0 � RAac 1 J C I / [40501� '3 F. a o 44 HUM D EXIST. HOUSE FARKNO LOT WDOCAMW SCtEIX E N a 10 30 r-w ' PM 13 N/F STATE OF VER&M L Tt LON/ i/ TOTAL L07 AkEf+ 164111 S.F. T10TE / /S BUILDING AREA 13060 S.F.9�EY ACTS AND BOAS ARE % COVERAGE �x95% BA9ED UJ A 1989 SURVEYDONE BY / V�D �ISTREET ASSOC.� FRONT YARD AREA 11649 S.F. 5L FINE KVER Z COVERAGE 28.74% BllRIfJOTON � % ALLOWED 30% J U L l s 1994 TOTAL AREA COVERED 00577 S.F. i COVERAGE 40.45% l l % ALLOWED 70% City of So. Burlington DATE I FMVWM On MAN JW.1 REJUJIY IYiilar ME DEALEM19W S" 9YELOWNE ROAD. 90. MML140TOK VOUAONT w Sam IV^ mue a A2061 . vam%w _ @CAM A6 OHMM or�� 0"**W Nu 1 wy n � o 27 HI&H wru 1 M01- _---- �— T N iT <r t/'i I (7 I N A4 Vs try 1 - I 1 1 ki: L OCT 13 1995 City of So. Burlington 30 0 30 ba. 71 MOM1,20 rn�lMit!^V SITt rLAN C 2 - rFo� T11VI" t rirl^ rl S►inPuFtNe P.M GkS-"7�) — sOul Per-+-10&ToN , VT 9s 43 5 KNIGHT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. j0•12•15 l.0. M[ !f, •IIIIfTOF. IT.. HISS - T[l. f)fSHf Or elt L O. CHS-Ul '\Il - Wig "Y 'INUI\lIM V 216W woo _ G ) OIr C9 04 G Ii 'J.l� � rJaL9�Jl'Nn�l ul�lo� (L aL04 sn) 4,J s14 1aAs S.u+'�i Y11J � l,I�d1�J..ICl,��t,l.► r1VIi No1S flow" o AIAJ.Uw11n �l GAII 9r11� �IAJii'q ie— uol2uiian8 -oS jo Ain S661 C T 130 I09 ,Je111SIN�✓.1.1.1�✓d / F .1A.1 ✓i Jo City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 31, 1996 Mark P. Scheer, Esquire 1270 West Peachtree Street Suite 8-C Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Re: NAPA Store, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Scheer: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is in response to your correspondence of January 24, 1996. 1. The zoning and land use designation for the subject property is Commercial 2 (C2). 2. A copy of the zoning and subdivision regulations will be forwarded to you upon receipt of check in the amount of $11.63 made payable to "City of South Burlington". 3. The retail use is a permitted use and the wholesale use is a conditional use in the C2 District. 4. The parking requirement for the retail use is: one (1) space for each 150 square feet of retail floor area. The parking requirement for the wholesale use is: one (1) space for each 200 square feet of floor area devoted to office use, plus two (2) spaces for each three (3) non -office employees plus one (1) space for each company vehicle operating from the premises. The sign regulations are enclosed for your information. Approvals needed from the City are as follows: 1. Subdivision approval is needed to create the lot. 2. Site plan approval is needed for the proposed building. Mark P. Scheer, Esquire NAPA Store January 31, 1996 Page 2 3. A conditional use permit is needed for the wholesale use and for the multiple use (retail and wholesale). 4. A zoning permit is needed to construct the proposed building. 5. A sign permit is needed for any signs. The impact fees which would apply include road and sewer. The information for the road impact fee is contained within the enclosed impact fee ordinance. The sewer allocation fee is $2.50 per gallon based on the estimated daily usage. You should contact the State Environmental Office at 802-879-6563 for any State permits which might pertain to this project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, fbn2 RJ. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJBlmcp 1 Encl MARK P. SCHEER ATTORNEY AT LAW 1270 WEST PEACHTREE STREET SUITE 8-C ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309 404-888-0870 January 24, 1996 Mr. Ray Belair Planning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Belair: I would appreciate it if you would forward to me the following items with regard to the property described below: 1. Zoning and land use designations of the property. 2. Copy of Zoning and Land Use Ordinances which are applicable to the property. 3. Letter stating that the proposed use set forth below is permitted. 4. Parking and signage requirements. The property is located at the northeast corner of the 4.6 acres tract located at 1691 Shelburne Road (Route 7), South Burlington, Chittenden County, Vermont, containing one acre and having frontage of 190 feet along Shelburne Road and a depth of 230 feet. The, current owners are Albert and Rita Reyes. The proposed use of the property includes the operation of an automotive parts store, known as NAPA The Parts Store, to sell at both retail and wholesale. Please inform me of any additional approvals or permits which may be required by the city or county. In addition, please inform me as to the imposition of any impact or concurrency fees or assessments or required off -site improvements in connection with the development of the property. If subject to such fees, please forward to me the relevant information with regard thereto and any required applications. I appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions, please contact me. erely, Mar k\,P. er City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 19, 1995 Albert J. Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Two (2) Lot Subdivision, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Reyes: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the October 24, 1995 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ' cerel , 7 Jo Weith, C' y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Terry Harris A-4- fi-v� -- .0 -S� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 20, 1995 Albert J. Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Two (2) Lot Subdivision, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Reyes: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of next Tuesday's Planning Commission agenda and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 24, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Ili erel , Weith, y Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Terry Harris PLANNING COMMISSION 24 October 1995 page 2 icted on a plan entitled "O'Brien's Trainina Center Shelburne Road, South Burlin ton, Ver.mont," re ared bv Truex, deGroot, and Cullins Ar.chitec_ts dated 5 26 94 and stam ed "received"October 11, 1995, with the following stipulations: 1. All 2revious-a.2,2rovals and stipulations which are not su er.- seded by this a22roval shall remain in effect. 2. Based on the expressed reauest of VAOT in a letter dated Au ust 23 1995 the Plannina Commission eliminates conditions #7 of the 5 12 92 a roval and condition #3 of the,_712Z94_.approval re uirin the applicant to construct a sidewalk alon the sub'ect property's fronta e. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion 2assed unanimous) . 4. Sketch Plan applicationof Albert & Rita Reyes to subdivide a 3.757 acre parcel into two lots of 1.31 acres and 2.447 acres, 1691 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Harris presented the plan. He noted that the applicant bought one piece of the property in 1961 and the other. in 1966. It is the latter piece that they want to subdivide in order to build a retail establishment fronting on Shelburne Rd. The re- mainder of the property would be for a future undetermined use. There are houses on the adjoining parcels. Mr. Harris noted there is a prospective buyer for the front lot who wants a minimum amount of land for his facility.. He added that they are aware of the minimum 200 ft. required for frontage. Mr. Sheahan said he felt very strongly about minimizing curb cuts and would like to see only one curb cut for. the 2 lots. Mr. Harris said the purchaser. wants 2 accesses for his business. Mr. Austin said he would like to see one curb cut for all three lots. Mr. Weith noted that regulations require a minimum 200ft. of frontage. The 35 feet of frontage for the back lot would not be allowed. Mr. Burgess said the only legal way to do such a subdivision would be to keep the legal frontage of 200 ft. and to create a right-of-way to the rear lot. But there could then not be a sign for the rear lot. The applicant said they will consider their options. 5. Discussion with filbert. & Rita Reyes regarding a preliminary site plan to construct an 8,000 sq. ft. retail building, 1691 Shelburne Rd: PLANNING COMMISSION 24 October 1995 page 3 Mr. Harris said the potential buyer wants 2 accesses. Mr. Burgess asked why this is necessary as there can be only one sign. Mr. Harris said they want to have parking in front of the building. Mr.. Sheahan said they can do that with only one access. Mr. Austin suggested a second access to the rear. Mr. Harris asked if the- Ryeses could access the 2 houses from one of the 2 curb cuts. Mr. Burgess asked if one would be an entrance and one an exit. Mr. Harris said they would like en- trance and exit from both. Mr. Teeson said he would like to see the northern access closed and have all three lots access from the southern curb cut. Mr.. Beaudin agreed. Mr. Harris asked if there is any variability in the amount of parking required. Mr. Burgess said that historically the Com- mission has waived a few spaces, but probably not more than that. Mr. Weith added that if the applicant could show where addition- al parking could go in the future if needed, the Commission would consider it. 6. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of Pines Housing, L.P., to amend a previously approved planned commercial development consisting of 88,740 sq. ft. of medical and general office use and a 124 unit nursing/convalescent home, 421 Dorset Street. The amendment is to 1) convert 6,000 sq. ft. of basement area in the nursing/convalescent home to a senior center., and 2) expand the parking area to accommodate the senior center: Mr. Giebink reviewed the changes since the sketch plan. The City received a $200,000 block grant from the state and will contribute about $50,000 more to the project. The principal change is to parking. Mr. Giebink showed the approved plan and the location of 29 additional parking spaces which are all being handled on the site. They are adding 6 spaces at the end of the existing lot and 2 where the power pole was moved. 21 spaces are being added in the middle of the lot. A resident asked when the fence will be built. Mr. Giebink said it will be put up before the building is occupied. They are on schedule for a December 4th opening. A resident noted a lighting fixture which seemes to have very little holding it in place. Mr. Giebink said it is 4 inches into concrete and won't come down. Residents also expressed concern with snow from this property being dumped on their lots. Mr. Giebink assured this won't happen. Memorandum October 24, October 20, Page 4 6) - Planning 1995 agenda items 1995 ALBERT & RITA REYES - RETAIL BUILDING - DISCUSSION The applicant has requested a preliminary discussion on a site plan for an 8,000 square foot retail building on proposed lot #1. Access appears to be the main issue for discussion. Access: The applicant is proposing two (2) 24 foot wide ingress and egress curb cuts for the proposed retail building. The southerly access will also provide access to lot #2. Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations limits one (1) curb cut per lot unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission. The auto dealership approved on this property on 7/26/94 which was never built had only one (1) curb cut. Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to require reservation of land for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Planning Commission required in the previously mentioned auto dealership approval that an access be provided to the property to the north in an effort to improve the traffic access and circulation. Staff recommends that both lots be served by only one curb -cut on Shelburne Road which is consistent with the Commission's policy to minimize the number of driveways on high volume arterial roadways. Other: The site plan should include the following additional information: --- contours (existing and finished) --- proposed landscaping --- bike rack --- coverage information --- exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) 7) HANNAFORD BROTHERS COMPANY - AMEND CONDITION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This application is to amend condition #4(d) attached to the approval of a final plat application for construction of a ten (10) building planned unit development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of n Memorandum - Planning October 24, 1995 agenda items October 20, 1995 Page 3 Traffic: Enclosed is a summary of a traffic analysis conducted by the applicant's consultant, RSG. It is estimated that the senior center will generate approximately 40 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour during about 50 days of the year. All other days, it is estimated that there will be little if no additional traffic during the P.M. peak since it is anticipated that on those days the senior center will operate only between 9:00 A.M. and 3:30 P.M. The study indicates that the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service with the senior center. The applicant should be aware that based on 40 P.M. peak hour trip ends, the road impact fee will be approximately $6,300. Other: Plans should show finished contours. 5) ALBERT & RITA REYES - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the subdivision of a 3.757 acre parcel into two (2) lots of 1.31 acres (lot #1) and 2.447 acres (lot #2). This property located at 1691 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the north by Shearer Chevrolet, on the west by Vermont Railway, on the south by two (2) residences, and on the east by Shelburne Road. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet will be met for both lots. The minimum lot frontage requirement of 200 feet will be met by lot #1 but not lot #2. Lot #2 is proposed to have 35 feet of frontage on Shelburne Road. Staff recommends that the entire frontage go with lot #1 and that lot #2 be served by a r.o.w. across lot #1. Access: The applicant would like to have a separate curb cut for each lot (see discussion below on preliminary site plan). Staff recommends that both lots be served by one shared curb -cut on Shelburne Road. C.O. District: Portions of lot #2 are located within the C.O. District and this is shown on the plan. Other: The sketch plan should note that the westerly property line is the zoning boundary between the R1 District to the west and the C2 District to the east. 3 Memorandum - Planning October 24, 1995 agenda items October 20, 1995 Page 4 6) ALBERT & RITA REYES - RETAIL BUILDING - DISCUSSION The applicant has requested a preliminary discussion on a site plan for an 8,000 square foot retail building on proposed lot #1. Access appears to be the main issue for discussion. Access: The applicant is proposing two (2) 24 foot wide ingress and egress curb cuts for the proposed retail building. The southerly access will also provide access to lot #2. Section 26.103(a) of the zoning regulations limits one (1) curb cut per lot unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission. The auto dealership approved on this property on 7/26/94 which was never built had only one (1) curb cut. Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to require reservation of land for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Planning Commission required in the previously mentioned auto dealership approval that an access be provided to the property to the north in an effort to improve the traffic access and circulation. Staff recommends that both lots be served by only one curb -cut on Shelburne Road which is consistent with the Commission's policy to minimize the number of driveways on high volume arterial roadways. Other: The site plan should include the following additional information: --- contours (existing and finished) --- proposed landscaping --- bike rack --- coverage information --- exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) 7) HANNAFORD BROTHERS COMPANY - AMEND CONDITION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This application is to amend condition #4(d) attached to the approval of a final plat application for construction of a ten (10) building planned unit development on a 38.5 acre lot consisting of 4 �§lidtb ISurlingtnn V ire Department 575 Darset street 1 �. *autb igurlingtan. lRermant 05403 40 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 I�IDOto) 10RAa101al TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief DATE: October 12, 1995 RE: Plans Review for October 24, 1995 Meeting I have reviewed the following site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. O'Brien's Training Center Shelburne Road Acceptable 2. Dorset Land Company Dorset Street Acceptable 3. Albert & Rita Reyes Shelburne Road Acceptable Dated 10/11/95 Dated 10/6/95 Project No. 86090-56 Dated 10/12/95 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: October 24, 1995 agenda items Date: October 13, 1995 DORSET LAND COMPANY - DORSET STREET Site plan prepared by Trudell Engineering and received by City October 6, 1995 showing the relocated parking lot is acceptable. O'BRIEN TRAINING CENTER - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan deleting the Shelburne Road sidewalk prepared by Truex, deGroot, Cullins Architects received October 11, 1995 is acceptable. SOUTHLAND - SHELBURNE ROAD The redesign of the intersections with Shelburne Road recommended by the State Highway Department, a sketch of which was received October 19, 1995, is acceptable. REYES PROPERTY - SHELBURNE ROAD SUBDIVISION 1. Shelburne Road water main is on the east side of the street. To reach it will require boring Shelburne Road. It may be much less expensive to connect to the Champlain Water District main that crosses the property to the west. Lot No. 1 and also the lot to the south should retain that right if they so desire. 2. The large drainage pipe (66") should be within a 30 foot easement. CTMV TAT TAT 1. The 7 foot retaining wall is almost entirely on top of the 66 inch culvert pipe. This is not acceptable. No permanent M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: October 24, 1995 agenda items Date: October 13, 1995 DORSET LAND COMPANY - DORSET STREET Site plan prepared by Trudell Engineering and received by City October 6, 1995 showing the relocated parking lot is acceptable. O'BRIEN TRAINING CENTER - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan deleting the Shelburne Road sidewalk prepared by Truex, deGroot, Cullins Architects received October 11, 1995 is acceptable. SOUTHLAND - SHELBURNE ROAD The redesign of the intersections with Shelburne Road recommended by the State Highway Department, a sketch .of which was received October 19, 1995, is acceptable. REYES PROPERTY - SHELBURNE ROAD SUBDIVISION 1. Shelburne Road water main is on the east side of the street. To reach it will require boring Shelburne Road. It may be much less expensive to connect to the Champlain Water District main that crosses the property to the west. Lot No. 1 and also the lot to the south should retain that right if they so desire. 2. The large drainage pipe (66") should be within a 30 foot easement. a TMLI nr TwT 1. The 7 foot retaining wall is almost entirely on top of the 66 inch culvert pipe. This is not acceptable. No permanent Preliminary Comments October 24, 1995 agenda items October 20, 1995 Page 2 structures should be constructed within the 30 foot drainage easement. 2. Water and sewer services should be shown on the site plan. 3. Road openings will require State Highway approval. 4. A sidewalk should be included across the frontage. This will also require State approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record Albert J. & Rita J. Reyes 1693 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 b. Applicant Albert J. & Rita J. Reyes c. Contact Albert T. Reyes 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Single lot subdivision for retail establishment 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. Fee simple 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties John F. Shearer State of Vermont Bakery Acquisition Company 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Existing 20' w. easement to Champlain Water District .. remnining Iqnd- Existing 75' w. easement to Velco on remaining land. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. Connection to municipal sanitary sewer and municipal water 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: N/A 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 81 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (Signature) applicant or contact person o,2i�115 Date KNIGHT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. P.O. BOX 29 WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 Tel: 802-879-6343 Fax: 802-879-6376 STEPHEN C. KNIGHT, JR., P.E. ROGER W. DORWART, P.E. MARTIN W. HAIN, P.E. Epic H. GODDARD, P.E. ALBERT W. HARRIS, L.S. October 12, 1995 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington City Planner Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Albert Reyes Sketch Plan Application Dear Joe: CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION CONSTRUCTION TESTING SURVEYING Delivered herewith are five 241lx36" blueprints and one 11"x17" reduced copy of the sketch plan we have prepared with the application for Albert and Rita Reyes' proposed single lot subdivision on Shelburne Road. Please schedule Mr. Reyes for sketch plan review on October 24. I will likely be present to assist Mr. Reyes in the presentation to the planning commission. Additionally, please schedule Mr. Reyes for an informal discussion of site plan issues on his proposed Lot 1 following his sketch plan review. To assist us in the site plan discussion I am delivering herewith five blueprints of the preliminary site plan we have prepared. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely yours, A.W. (Terry) Harris Licensed Surveyor AWH/kdb File: 95435-1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 11, 1994 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Auto Sales & Service Facility, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on July 26, 1994. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Krely, h, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: William Savoie City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 11, 1994 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Auto Sales & Service Facility, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the July 26, 1994 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning/building permit be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ce ely, oe Weith, City Planner JW / mcp 1 Encl cc: William Savoie PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JULY 1994 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 26 July 1994, at 7:30 pm, in the conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Mac Teeson, Terrence Sheahan, Mark Crow, Gayle Barone Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Liam Murphy, Sharon & Bill Savoie, Steve Vock, Tom Heilmann, Rita & Al Reyes, Pat LaClair, John Larkin Gary Lavigne 1. Other Business: No issues were raised. 2. Site Plan Application of JWJ Realty to construct a 15,460 sq. ft. auto sales & service facility with 13,060 sq. feet on the first floor and 2400 sq. ft. on the second floor, 1691 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Lavigne located the property just south of the Shearer facility. The entry from Shelburne Rd. will be 30 ft. wide. There would be both used car and new car displays in front with employee parking in the rear. along with stacking for new and repair cars. The front facade will be large metal panels. There will also be a canopy in front with a raised facade to hide the roof -top mechanicals. Mr. Weith noted the applicant is $1500 short on landscaping. Mr. Lavigne said they are getting estimates now and if they are short, they will make it up. The question of drainage was raised. The City Engineer has said that the 150 ft. of 24" pipe along the northern side of the property can be eliminated by a drop inlet tied to the 72" pipe. Mr. Vock said he needs to talk to Mr. Szymanski about this. Members agreed to let this be worked out with the City Engineer and City Planner. If a problem still exists, it can come back to the Commission. Mrs. Maher noted 18 trees that seem to be on top of the drainage pipes. Mr. Vock said they will not be located on top of pipes but on the side of the slope. Mr. Burgess asked whether the setbacks are measured from the existing Shelburne Rd. or the planned upgraded road. Mr. Weith said they are measured from the current road. Mr. Lavigne said the State won't give them any numbers to work with for the new road. Mr. Weith suggested estimating 5' of taking by the road project. PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JULY 1994 PAGE 2 Mr. Lavigne said they will move things back to meet front yard coverage assuming the state will be taking 5 feet. Mr. Burgess said if the state doesn't take 5 ft., the applicant can come back and ask to move forward again. If the state takes more, the Commission won't ask them to move back further. Mr. Crow asked the purpose of the paved plaza area. Mr. Lavigne said that is for the display of cars. Mr. Murphy, representing Shearer Chevrolet, said they have a concern with the future access area. He said there are legal im- plications for Shearer in having to provide access to this property across the Shearer property. He wanted to make it clear that Shearer makes no agreement to do this. Mr. Murphy also expressed concern with grade elevation and wanted to insure that the slab elevation was no more than 150 ft. Mr. Heilmann, representing the applicant, said there are engineering tolerances that could be one or 2 feet higher. After considerable discussion, the applicant agreed that the elevation of the slab be 150 ft. within normal engineering tolerances. Mrs. Maher moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan ap- plication of JWJ Realty to construct a 15,460 sq. ft. auto sales and service facility with 13,060 sq. ft. on the first floor and 2,400 sq. ft. on the second floor, 1691 Shelburne Rd, as depicted on a_two page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan, J.W.J. Reality(sic) Automotive Dealership, 1691 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc, dated 7/19/94, with the following stipulations: 1. A $15,500 landscape bond shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to cover the cost of the new landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/build- ing permit to show the changes listed below and shall require ap- proval of the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a. The plan shall be revised to provide a minimum five foot grass strip for snow storage between the used car parking area and the adjacent residential property. b. The plan shall be revised to meet the front yard coverage requirement after the proposed land taking for the Shelburne Road improvements, based on current plans (i.e., 5' taking). c. The plan shall be revised to show the trees proposed along the north property line planted at least 10 feet away from the PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JULY 1994 PAGE 3 72 inch pipe. 3. The applicant shall contribute $1,178 to the Shelburne Road In- tersection Improvement Fund prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit based on the 45.9 vte's estimated to be generated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is approved. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. All site lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6. The applicant shall provide an estimate from a qualified landscaper of the value of proposed landscaping. If the estimate is less than the required $15,500, the plan shall be revised to show additional landscaping which meets the shortfall. The revised plan shall require approval by the City Planner. 7. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall work with the City Engineer to explore the possibility of eliminating the 150 feet of 24 inch drainage pipe along the north side of the property and instead installing a drop inlet tied to the existing 72 inch pipe. If an acceptable solution is found and is approved by the City Enginner,, the plan shall be revised ac- cordingly. If it is found by the City Engineer that the 24 inch pipe is necessary, the plan shall be revised to show the stone fill at the pipe outfall extended approximately 60 feet to the bottom of the bank. 8. In an effort to improve traffic access and circulation pursuant to Section 19.751 of the Zoning Regulations, the applicant shall record an access agreement allowing vehicle access between the ap- plicant's property (1691 Shelburne Road) and the adjoining property to the north (1675 Shelburne Road) which is currently owned by John F. Shearer. This agreement shall allow 1675 Shelburne Road to access 1691 Shelburne Road via the access shown on the site plan. This agreement shall be contingent upon mutual agreement being recorded by 1675 Shelburne Road which would allow 1691 Shelburne Road access to 1675 Shelburne Road via the proposed connection. The access agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 9. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six months or this approval is null and void. PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JULY 1994 PAGE 4 10. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 11. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 12. There shall be no parking or displaying of vehicles or merchandise in the entrance or access aisles or on any green area. 13. As expressly represented by the applicant, the finished floor elevation of the building shall not exceed 150 feet based upon the benchmark established on the plans plus or minus normal engineering tolerances. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Review parking counts taken during the past year at Howard Johnsons/Quality Suites required as part of the 7/13/93 amendment, 1720 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Weith noted the plan shows 279 spaces. There are actually 247 built. The plan was to be reviewed to see the 24 spaces behind the building are needed. The study shows the spaces are not needed as the highest count take was 207 cars. However, 32 spaces that were supposed to be built aren't built. Members felt that if those spaces aren't need, they would just as soon have green space. Mr. Larkin said if the spaces were needed, they would be begging to build them. Members felt there shouldbe a revised final plat. Mrs. Maher moved that as a result of the monitoring program done at Howard Johnson's/Quality Suites, the 24 reserved parking spaces do not have to be put in. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Review health and status of grassed paver block area of the emergency access to Pillsbury Manor III required as part of the 8/10/93 amendment, 1530 Williston Road: Mr. Weith said it looks as if the pavers are working well. There are a few spotty areas which could use some grass. Mr. Larkin agreed to do this. As there was no further business to come befo the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00_p.m. A Clerk I i' 'J M41G� cd77 �q ti rt, 7/26/94 OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of JWJ Realty to construct a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility with 13,060 square feet on the first floor and 2,400 square feet on the second floor, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan, J.W.J. Realty (sic) Automotive Dealership, 1691 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" proposed by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc., dated 7/19/94, with the following stipulations: 1. A $15,500 landscape bond shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to cover the cost of the new landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a. The plan shall be revised to provide a minimum five (5) foot grass strip for snow storage between the used car parking area and the adjacent residential property. b. The plan shall be revised to meet the front yard coverage requirement after the,proposed land taking for the Shelburne Road improvements . ----- j'* 4, . 7 ) C. The plan shall be revised to show the trees proposed along the north property line planted at least 10 feet away from the 72 inch pipe. , d.XTh /' Lid a - sche�ie) shill be revised tQ add $1500 of d,op i val to met t 15,500 landscaping requirement. 3. The applicant shall contribute $1,178 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit based on the 45.9 vte's estimated to be generated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is approved. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. All site lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6'. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall work with the City Engineer to explore the possibility of eliminating the 150 feet of 24 inch drainage pipe along the north side of the property and instead installing a drop inlet tied to the existing 72 inch pipe. If an acceptable solution is found and is approved by the City Engineer, the plan shall be revised accordingly. If it is found by the City Engineer that the 24 inch pipe is necessary, the plan shall be revised to show the stone fill at the pipe outfall extended approximately 60 feet to the bottom of the bank. ;7 In an effort to improve traffic access and circulation pursuant to Section 19.751 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall record an access agreement allowing vehicle access between the applicant's property (1691 Shelburne Road) and the adjoining property to the north (1675 Shelburne Road) which is currently owned by John F. Shearer. This agreement shall allow 1675 Shelburne Road to access 1691 Shelburne Road via the access shown on the site plan. This agreement shall be contingent upon mutual agreement being recorded by 1675 Shelburne Road which would allow 1691 Shelburne Road access to 1675 Shelburne Road via the proposed connection. The access agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 10. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. K, 7/26/94 MOTION OF APPROVAL WR I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of JWJ Realty to construct a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility with 13,060 square feet on the first floor and 2,400 square feet on the second floor, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan, J.W.J. Realty (sic) Automotive Dealership, 1691 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" proposed by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc., dated 7/19/94, with the following stipulations: 1. A $15,500 landscape bond shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to cover the cost of the new landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a. The plan shall be revised to provide a minimum five (5) foot grass strip for snow storage between the used car parking area and the adjacent residential property. b. The plan shall be revised to meet the front yard coverage requirement after the proposed land taking for the Shelburne Road improvements. c. The plan shall be revised to show the trees proposed along the north property line planted at least 10 feet away from the 72 inch pipe. , d. The landscaping schedule shall be revised to add $1500 of landscaping value to meet the $15,500 landscaping requirement. 3. The applicant shall contribute $1,178 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit based on the 45.9 vte's estimated to be generated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is approved. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. All site lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any, change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 1 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of JWJ Realty to construct a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility with 13,060 square feet on the first floor and 2,400 square feet on the second floor, 1691 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled "Site Plan, J.W.J. Realty (sic) Automotive Dealership, 1691 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont" proposed by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc., dated 7/19/94, with the following stipulations: 1. A $15,500 landscape bond shall be posted prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to cover the cost of the new landscaping. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 2. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a. The plan shall be revised to provide a minimum five (5) foot grass strip for snow storage between the used car parking area and the adjacent residential property. b. The plan shall be revised to meet the front yard coverage requirement after the proposed land taking for the Shelburne Road improvements. c. The plan shall be revised to show the trees proposed along the north property line planted at least 10 feet away from the 72 inch pipe. , d. The landscaping schedule shall be revised to add $1500 of landscaping value to meet the $15,500 landscaping requirement. 3. The applicant shall contribute $1,178 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit based on the 45.9 vte's estimated to be generated by this project. 4. A sewer allocation of 300 gpd is approved. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 5. All site lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any, change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 1 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall work with the City Engineer to explore the possibility of eliminating the 150 feet of 24 inch drainage pipe along the north side of the property and instead installing a drop inlet tied to the existing 72 inch pipe. If an acceptable solution is found and is approved by the City Engineer, the plan shall be revised accordingly. If it is found by the City Engineer that the 24 inch pipe is necessary, the plan shall be revised to show the stone fill at the pipe outfall extended approximately 60 feet to the bottom of the bank. -- 7. In an effort to improve traffic access and circulation pursuant to Section 19.751 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall record an access agreement allowing vehicle access between the applicant's property (1691 Shelburne Road) and the adjoining property to the north (1675 Shelburne Road) which is currently owned by John F. Shearer. This agreement shall allow 1675 Shelburne Road to access 1691 Shelburne Road via the access shown on the site plan. This agreement shall be contingent upon mutual agreement being recorded by 1675 Shelburne Road which would allow 1691 Shelburne Road access to 1675 Shelburne Road via the proposed connection. The access agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning/building permit within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the building. 10. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 28, 1994 Steve Vock Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05489 Re: J.W.J. Realty, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Vock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 The Planning Commission's 7/26/94 approval of the above referenced project included a sewer allocation of 300 gpd. This project will be served by the City's Bartlett Bay treatment facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. Please do not hesitate to contract me if you have any questions. ;inely, ith, lanner JW/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: July 26, 1994 agenda items Date: July 22, 1994 2) JWJ REALTY - AUTO SALES & SERVICE - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 15,460 square foot auto sales and service facility. This facility will have 13,060 square feet on the first floor and 2,400 square feet on the second floor. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on July 25, 1994 will consider a request from the applicant for a conditional use permit. This property located at 1691 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the north by Shearer Chevrolet, on the west by Vermont Railway, on the south by two (2) residential buildings and on the east by Shelburne Road. Access/circulation: Access will be provided by a 30 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. This access is shown at a different location than shown on the Shelburne Road improvement plans. Applicant has provided evidence of approval from VAOT for the access location proposed. Staff recommends that the applicant record a mutual access agreement in which the applicant would agree to grant access to his property from the Shearer property to the north if and when the applicant is granted access to the Shearer property. This is similar to the condition imposed on Peter Judge at 100 Dorset Street for mutual access between his property and the Greer's property. This future access is shown on the site plan. Section 19.751 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to require access to abutting properties to improve general access and circulation in the area. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 8% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 40% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 28.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). The front yard should be designed to meet the front yard coverage requirement after the land taking for the Shelburne Road improvments. Setback requirements will be met. Parking: The minimum parking requirement for this project is 31 spaces and 34 spaces are being provided including two (2) handicapped spaces. 1,. Memorandum - Planning July 26, 1994 agenda items July 22, 1994 Page 2 Traffic: This property lies within Traffic Overlay Zone 5 which limits this property to 184.6 vehicle trip ends vte's during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the proposed use will generate 45.9 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant will be required to contribute $1178 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on the 45.9 vte's expected to be generated by this development. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement for this project, based on building costs, is $15,500 which according to staff calculations is $1500 short of the requirement. Applicant should �w either revise the landscaping schedule to meet the requirement or (" provide an estimate from a landscaper that the plantings proposed will meet the requirement. Plantings will include Little Leaf Linden, Austrian Pine, Honey Locust, Sugar Maple, Juniper, �� Bearberry, Cinquefoil, Burning Bush and Sandcherry. y Bartlett Brook Watershed: This development lies within the Bartlett Brook watershed and it has been the Planning Commission's policy to request review of substantial development in the watershed by Wagner, Heindel and Noyes. The purpose of the review is to evaluate the effects of development on downstream stream - banks and hydraulic structures. This report should be reviewed prior to approval by the Planning Commission in the event that Wagner, Heindel and Noyes suggests changes to the plan. C.O. Zone: A portion of site is within a C.O. zone. No portion of this zone will be disturbed by development. Sewer: The sewer allocation needed for this project is 300 gpd. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. Lighting: Exterior lighting will consist of the following: --- 23 - 250 watt metal halide lamps with cutoff luminaries on 18 poles, 20 feet in height. --- 4 - 175 watt metal halide lamps with cutoff luminaries mounted on the building. The point by point lighting plan submitted indicates that the maximum illumination at ground level will have an average of 2.7 foot candles (maximum allowed is 3.0 foot candles). E Memoandum - Planning July 26, 1994 agenda items July 22, 1994 Page 3 Other: --- the dumpster is located at the rear of the building and will be enclosed with a fence. 3) JOHN LARKIN - REVIEW PARKING COUNTS - HOWARD JOHNSON/QUALITY SUITES The 7/13/93 approval amending conditions #7 and #8 of the 12/17/91 ballroom addition approval (minutes enclosed) required the Planning Commission review parking counts and determine whether additional parking is needed. Parking counts for the past year were submitted as required. Counts were taken on a Friday and Saturday of each month between the hours of 6:00 and 8:00 P.M. The results of the parking counts are indicated on the enclosed table and graphs. These traffic counts revealed that the maximum number of parked vehicles during the past year was 207 vehicles which happened on 3/19/94. The property has 247 parking spaces with a requirement that 32 additional spaces be constructed as part of the ballroom approval (i.e., 279 total spaces). These 32 spaces have not been constructed. The 12/17/91 approval, besides requiring the additional 32 spaces, required the plans to show an additional 24 spaces. The purpose of the parking counts is to determine whether these 24 spaces are required. It is staff's opinion that the 24 additional spaces are, not needed. 4) JOHN LARKIN - PILLSBURY MANOR III - REVIEW CONDITION The 8/10/93 approval (minutes enclosed) for an amendment to the Pillsbury Manor III community care home on Williston Road required the Planning Commission to review the health and status of the grass paver block area of the emergency access in July, 1994. The grass paver block area is designed to appear as lawn, and therefore discourages use by vehicles, but is strong enough to accommodate emergency vehicles if the need arises. This area looks good from the street but upon closer inspection a few bare spots are seen. Staff recommends that these areas be reseeded to establish a uniform grass cover. Overall, the grass paver block design is working well. 3 ,w •0006� Z-7 � 3L VT ACT DEPT OF E1'4GRu TES. ; 8C2-82c-24a WCJit-IC' kit and faX tta',IS UIW Mtit'I'lo V/1 Mr, Stephen Voc% Civil Engineering Ass ;ociate,, Inc. POGt Office BOX 485 Shelburne, Verit,.ont 0502 Re: Prop000d Ni&San Del,lt rahi.p 91-J Pu ' Dear Mr. Vock i 15.3 As a' fvl1cw-up to our te? ephone OnVerzaticm of L7uly 180 1904, x field rev,iawed the proposed site for the relocation of the Nissan Dealership and offer the fg1lowia1g. The drive 10catf on as prcposf,-d (arl,, rcxi.jastely 100 feet north of the property iine) will met I rc4ulrem£,nts for sight djls-I anc�o, and we will issud a pOwmit after a set of construction on plans are reviewed and approved and after you have ol;,tain%d your local and tict 250 approvals. The deeign of the drive Dhoul.d be Compatible With.the upoom�nq S%e1bu n*-So ,h Burlington project 11nc€ should also be In accordance With the appropriate i ota Beta"A.s of StAn lard prawing B-71, oo,py attached At t.,iJ point, J. Wotil d s��c�,�1 •�t Detail C for the drive. In addition, if the residential property just Co the south ever closad up. b*00mea part of the dcalcra ip, we wild, require that. drive to bo WO will await an application and ConatruCtjon plane before proceadi.ng further with this projact , Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLAemw t1" -"d- 1.99• e•0:3a 1 Y pi367 F . July 14, 1994 ,JW,J kea 1 ty 1089 Shelburne clad so Fourl ington, V7 Ob40-3 Gary Lavi.,3ne W1.eman-•LarnphLr•e Co 1 r_ hestar•, V 1' 0$446 11mitr. Gary s Per our discussion c onc:er,ning Nashi.n� eqwipment at our new Ni ss6m l i,tyd We will not be installing arty wt hing P-quir,nient. Tt rr S never been nec:essar•y for us �o Acld arty equipment, to either of our- cil-her-- st ar-es 1 4roK:* +,hri.a :c+���rC?4w�5q any c:�lsrC6a�'n&s. 1, Wi l 1 °EtvUi.e► Vi a Pr•esi.dent IJW,. 0 a,� 1. 51Y 0 • cons► wg �'Wrogeolog%ts Ush del, clad N-YesI Lnc, ' M=nw SclentwtR W N P.4. Boat 1629 Burlington, tkrmort 05402-162 FAX 802-860-1014 July 26, 1904 Mr. Ray Belau Zoning " PWJW",,, s City of South i 576 Donal Sb" So. Surungton, VT OWN RE: Bw let; Br**, Propolai 'IMMMEI!WA Dealership Dear Rely: Wagner, Heindel, W4 NOy", Inc. (WH&N) has completed an evaluation of the proposed So h gudi Dealership location on Shelbume Road. A summary of our results is attaehW. The analysis has indicated that th$ proposed construction will not result In a sigMfioaf bncrease in the peak storm -water discharge rate to Bartlett Brook. Stormwow try; the site appears to ba adequate, although a few areas which will require sperm ution are noted. Should you have &f quesbons on this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, JAN/ral cc: SteNe do* MA PCLAA.LIMNW 04 W • Con$UWQ Hydrogedo9isbs • eers Engin Inc • • a=Nron W*W Sc P.O. &= 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-162 FAX: 802 860-11014 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS BMTl.MWIROWSOUTH BURLINGTON NISSAN DEALERSHIP I Wagner, Hem, and Noyes, Inc. (WH&N) has cornpletad a stormwater runoff asseS8rt OM Of the proposed relocation of the South Butiington Nissan Dealership using eve SgA G" Mion Service TA-20 hydrologic rnodei. The proposed site plan, prepefu'MM ad , y Civic Engineering Associatas, and Mated June, 1,994 has been uto � 10 ittrtalysis. 2. The TA-20 rrcomputes peak discharge hydrographs from individual subyvatersheft Ong iassigned coefficients which represent soil type, ground slope, ark l"W use conditions. Hydrographs from individual subwatersheds are then combined Jolla nig routing through simulated channel retches and hydraulic structuree. In way, -Natershed-wide peak runoff rates can be evaluated A cbrYtpoeft dea }lie containing all existing development conditions within the Bartlettt Brook shed is maintained by Y`1H&N, and has been continuously updated sir" 1964 as new development projects Are proposed and permitted. The de@4n gkm V the evaluation has been a 25 year, 24-hour storm event, or 4.0 kVhW Of W thin a 24-hour period tnT� s ode ��� pianr�b g Commissionin l SWIed � WWuations pursuant to So directive. 4. The aoilth B&*gton Nissan site is located within tha drainage area of the North Branch of SNOW Srook, immediately west of US Route 7. Peak discharge rates have bom #AWAaW both for the propert/ itself and at the point where all runoff from eve S Vie» the north fork of Bartlett Brook. 5, For fig WJotk,l- Condition, a single subwatersh d has been used to represent condit. ^,ns on #pis site. The projected peak discharge rates for the design storm ere I I'S aft ftm the site and 151.4 cfs at the ;north Branch of Bartlett Brook. 6 For the �OPMGmt condition, the site !gas been subdivided into a total of six subweds, reflecting the proposed stormwaLer drainage patterns on the 09 The Ong post -development peal{ discharge rates are 12.4 cfs from the site ttaW, OW 151.5 cfs at the North Branch Of Bartlett Brook. 7 1-htjs, na beam increase in peak discharge at Bartlett Brook will occur as a result of th& pMpoW development. Tt)e small] ^rta+gnitude of increased peak d}�f 1>* site itself is attributed to the presence of silty fill material within d ielopment area on the site at trie current time. Only slight the PM98"dIM meted peak discharge rates arcu, etween this condition and the paSWay condition. 8. From the prOPO* d impervious areas on the site, stormwater runoff will occur via overland flow a MSS vegetated areas. Stormwater drainage lines are proposed along the narlem and auuthem property boundaries of the lot. We understand that roof dreltvOwill be directed into the southern drainage pipe. At the outfall of each dreinsPOne, atone fill is proposed. Peak discharge rates of 5.76 cfs and 3.64 efs are proWed, respectively at the north and south culvert outfalls for the design storm, Measures should be undertaken to place additional stone fill, if needed or to evtWish a good vegetative cover at the downslope limit of the stone fill to pr*vwt aticalon at these locations. of particular concern is the area between the downsiope NMR of the stone fill at the northern culvert outfall and the outfall of the North Starrch of Bartlett Brook located approximately 50 feet to the west, given the St0WW slope and absence of good vegetative cover in this area. An alternate sokAW to provide proper conveyance of stormwater from this area would be to construct a drop inlet to the existing 72" CMP at this location. pimn.rrAL"ad City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 14 , 1994 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Auto Sales & Service Facility, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Tuesday, July 19, 1994. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc y, RaY mdnd J . B elair Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: William Savoie M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files From: Raymond J. Belai , Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, July 26, 1994 agenda items Date: July 11, 1994 JWJ REALTY - AUTO SALES & SERVICE - SITE PLAN --- front yard coverage information should be submitted. --- will cars be washed at this facility? --- submit results of Bartlett Brook watershed evaluation by Wagner, Heindel and Noyes. --- has VAOT approved location of curb cut? --- proposed landscaping is $1,500 short of the $15,500 requirement by staff calculations. --- applicant should submit point by point lighting plan and indicate average footcandles for the lighted portion of the site. Average should not exceed 3 foot candles. --- provide details of building mounted lights, if any. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: July 26, 1994 agenda items Date: July 18, 1994 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SITE - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. The north-west corner of the proposed building is on top of the large 72 inch drainage pipe. This is not permitted. The building should be at least 15 feet away. This drainage pipe serves Shelburne Road and a large area east of Shelburne Road. 2. The sewage pumping station should also be a least 15 feet away from the drainage pipe. 3. A road opening permit for the entrance drive must be obtained from the State. 4. A sidewalk will be constructed along the frontage as part of the street reconstruction. 5. The 18 inch drain pipe along the front of the building outlets on to the Shearer property to the north. It should be tied into the 72 inch or relocate to outlet westerly. E i I*vutb N urlingtvu N ire Department 575 19arset street ,*autb +Surlingtan. lRermant 05,103 FAX: (802) 658-4748 T0: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Wallace Possich, Fire Chief a RE: Plans Review for July 26 Meeting Date: July 12, 1994 The following plans have been reviewed and my comments are attached: 1. Automobile Dealership Shelburne Rd. Acceptable 2. Site Modifications for Mobile Dewatering Unit Airport Parkway Acceptable Project No. 94183 Dated 7-7c94 Project No. 02-9318 Dated 7-11-94 1 (802)658-7960 J�T �- /6 Gr,,z 46d l '{S9aiE'sI UNDEVELOPED ACRES 458.76 128.44 96.99 684.19 acres .jNING R1, R4 and AgRR C1 C2 NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS (P.M. PEAK HOUR) 768 8224 to 13,091 6210 to 9,886 15,202 to 23,745 at total build out Assume a ten year build out period with one fifth in two years.. Therefore, there will be 3040 to 4749 new p.m. peak hour trips added to Shelburne Road in two years or an average of 3895 by, splitting the difference. The total improvement package for off -site spot improvements is estimated at $100,000. (see attached cost estimates) Formula: L� # of new PM Peak Hour Trip ends / 3895 ='% x $100,000 = FEE EXAMPLE: Lakewood Associates 310 new p.m. peak hour trip ends / 3895 = 7.95% x $100,000 $7959 FEE. 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: July 26, 1994 agenda items Date: July 21, 1994 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP SITE - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. The 72 inch pipe drainage easement should be 30 feet in width located 15 feet each side of its centerline. This easement should be granted to the State of Vermont. 2. The 150 feet of 24 inch pipe along the north side of the property can be eliminated by a drop inlet tied to the 72 inch pipe. 3. Planting especially large trees such as maple and pine on top of the drainage pipe should be discouraged. They should be at least 10 feet away. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 22, 1994 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Auto Sales & Service Facility, 1691 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 26, 1994 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin6er¢ly, Jo,d Weith, ty Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: William Savoie AGFSTATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building _ Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 NSPORI July 19, 1994 Mr. Stephen Vock Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Post Office Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Proposed Nissan Dealership US Route 7, south Burlington Dear Mr. Vock: As a follow-up to our telephone conversation of July 18, 1994, I field reviewed the proposed site for the relocation of the Nissan Dealership and offer the following. The drive location as proposed (approximately 100 feet north of the property line) will meet our requirements for sight distance, and we will issue a permit after a set of construction plans are reviewed and approved and after you have obtained your local and Act 250 approvals. The design of the drive should be compatible with the upcoming Shelburne -South Burlington project and should also be in accordance with the appropriate details of Standard Drawing B-71, copy attached. At this point, I would suggest Detail C for the drive. In addition, if the residential property just to the south ever becomes part of the dealership, we will require that drive to be closed up. We will await an application and construction plans before proceeding further with this project. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Attachment cc: Joseph Wieth, City of South Burlington Louis Borie, District Environmental Coordinator #4 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. JAIL A RESIDENTIAL DRIVE MINIMUM RADIUS = THEORETICAL RADIUS MINUS SEE NOTE 5 SHOULDER WIDTH x I . XR , X 20' THEORETICAL RADIUS CURB (IF PRESENT ) TREATED SHOULDER EDGE DER EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY / LA-z 60: MIN. PAVEMENT HIGHWAY 90- ° DESIRABLE DETAIL B DUAL COMMERCIAL DRIVE TO BE USED ONLY UNDER SPECIAL CONDITIONS q�q 4/NOFO LINEPERTY �y6002A��p,{. '(Iql. • AO SEE NOTE 2 R=2 20 CURB ON R.O.W. \ MIN. R=20' x R.O.W. LINE X LINE R.O.W. LINE SHOULDER �- i x R=5' R=5, x CURB - i IF- 2RE.SENT) EDGE OF �. 5' MIN. 100' DESIRABLE TRAVELED 40' MINIMUM WAY A= 60° MINIMUM lV\ PAVEMENT HIGHWAY 90° DESIRABLE fAIL D TWO-WAY COMMERCIAL DRIVE WITH DIVISIONAL ISLAND DETAIL E RIGHT TURN LANE FOR COMMERCIAL DRIVE I SHOPPING CENTERS. LARGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS, (UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ONLY) USTRIAL PLANTS AND SERVICE STATIONS 4' MIN. 12'MAX. 24' MAX.24' MAX. PROPERTY LINE MINIMUM RADIUS = r7 'HEORETICAL MINUS SHOULDER WIDTH U I THE CU BED DIVISIONAL ISLAND SHALL NOT EXC EED "HEIGHT (AND HAVE NO PROJECTION D HAVE NO PROJECTION dIT OF PARKING AREA ABOVE TH CURB HEIGHT WITHIN THE R.U.W. (SEE NOTE 4) OR CLEAR ZONE) I R.O.W. LINE THEORETICALXRADIUIS 20, X 30'THEORETICAL RADIUS 4B `y� / MIN✓ V� PRESENT) .� / =__ MIN___�SEE DETAIL )OLDER EDGE �' ,,,E 2' �HCU�DERT EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY HIGHWAY 60°MINIMUM PAVEMENT LA- tO: DESIRABLE _ _ _I�_ TAIL G PERSPECTIVE SKETCH OF DRIVE INTERSECTION SHOWING DEPRESSION CLEAR ZONE DISTANCE VARIES WITH HIrWWAY rl ACG Amn TOArrlf vnl IIkAC REVISIONS AND CORRECTIONS fH15 STANDARD SUPERCEDES B-71(7/23/60R), 3-71A (3/12/90), AND B-13 (1244/71). DRIVE I USE WITH DETAILS C AND D WHEN VOLUME WARRANTS FOR SEE RIGHT TURN LANES ARE MET. ' LIMIT OF PARKING AREA ( SEE NOTE 4) R.o.w, LINE X x 30' MIN, RADIUS % f �� An / / MIN. RADIUS 30' LESS SHOULDER WIDTH I // D=• T=•- EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY A = 600 MINIMUM 90° DESIRABLE_ 4' HIGHWAY I (IF PRESENT )I �.,�SHOULDERIEDGE PAVEMENT -LENGTH OF FULL WIDTH STORAGE (D) iS 50' "'c"j FOR EACH 60 RIGHT TURNING VEHICLES IN SPEED (MPH) 30 40 50 DHV WITH MINIMUM LENGTH OF 50'. ••LENGTH (MIN)(FT)(T) 100 140 180 RATE 8:1 12.1 15:1 DETAIL H PROFILE OF DRIVE INTERSECTION SHOWING 5" DEPRESSION ( CUT SECTION ) DRIVE GRADE ( 15 % MAX, FOR AT LEAST 12 FEET FROM POINT 5" DEPRESSION OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION) / OLD GROUND SUBGRADE LINE `� �4 - i END SECTION (OPTIONAL DETAIL C TWO-WAY UNDIVIDED COMMERCIAL DRIVE FOR NOTES - SINGLE STORES, BUSINESSES, SMALL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS I. THIS SHEET IS INTENDED FOR USE, BY DESIGNERS ON HIGHWAY PROJECTS AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PERMIT, FOR WORK WITHIN HIGHWAY RIGHTS OF WAY (FORM TA 210). ALL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY THE 24' MINIMUM PERMIT AND INDICATED ON THIS SHEET SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY 40' MAXIMUM MIN. RADIUS fPROPERTY LINE OF THE APPLICANT AND IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF LIMIT OF PARKING AREA THEORETICAL THE VT, AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEN USED WITH THE PLANS (SEE NOTE 4 ) 35' RECOMMENDED RADIUS MINUS ! FOR A HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. THIS SHEET IS INTENDED TO BE SHOULDER WIDTH R.O.W. LINE A GUIDE FOR THE DESIGNER CONCERNING MIN/MAX DRIVE WIDTHS AND OTHER VERTICAL AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS. 10' THEORETICAL i RADIUS (URBAN) x 1 2. ALL COMMERCIAL DRIVES SHALL BE PAVED FROM THE EDGE OF THE 30' THEORETICAL X RADIUS (RURAL) X� 30' MIN. RADIUS (RURAL) TRAVELED WAY TO THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE FARTHEST POINT OF CURVATURE ON THE DRIVEWAY EDGE OR AS i/ DIRECTED BY THE DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATOR.THIS PAVING CURB (IF PRESENT) --MIN. ----� SEE DETAIL IS INDICATED IN THE DETAILS BY CROSSHATCHING. SHOULDER EDGE SHOULDER `- , E 3. DEPTH OF SUB -BASE. BASE, AND PAVEMENT TO BE THE SAME AS HIGHWAY OR MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN DETAIL J. WITHIN THE LIMITS EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY OF THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY, A = 600 MINIMUM PAVEMENT 4. VEHICULAR ACCESS FROM PARKING AREAS TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY HIGHWAY 90* DESIRABLE AT OTHER THAN APPROVED ACCESS POINTS WILL BE PREVENTED BY _ THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURBING OR OTHER SUITABLE PHYSICAL BARRIER. THIS DETAIL WILL ALSO A MAXIMUM WIDTH OF 20'. APPLY TO COMMERCIAL SERVICE ORIVES,WHEN AUTHORIZED,HAVING THE SERVICE DRIVE WILL HAVE A "SERVICE 5. IF CURB IS PRESENT, SEE APPROPRIATE CURB DETAIL STANDARD OR SIGN PLACED AT THE HIGHWAY VEHICLES ONLY" ROW LINE.SIGN SHALL BE 18"X 24" AS PRESCRIBED IN THE MATCH TOWN/CITY STANDARD CURB TREATMENT. STANDARD HIGHWAY SIGN BOOKLET, A SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLICATION TO MUTCD. 6, WHERE THE DESIGN HOUR VOLUME OF LEFT TURNING TRAFFIC FROM DETAIL F MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEENOF THE HIGHWAY INTO THE DRIVE IS SUBSTANTIAL. THE VT. AGENCY DRIVEWAYS AND INTERSECTING SIDEROADS TRANSPORTATION MAY REOUiRE SPECIAL LEFT -TURN TREATMENT AND/OR TRAFFIC SIGNALS. THE AGENCY WILL DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC TREATMENT TO BE USED, AND WILL WORK- WITH THE DEVELOPER IN w Q a I� w REGARD TO IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS. u1; 0 7. CIRCULAR DRAINAGE CULVERTS UNDER DRIVES SHALL HAVE A W'w o } w =o MINIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER ( I.D. ) OF 15". PIPE ARCHES a z N w a w = USED UNDER DRIVES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSIDE CROSS -SECTIONAL i I J < u a LL AREA EQUIVALENT TO THAT PROVIDED BY A 15" CIRCULAR PIPE. } r w 0 s s w 8. THE OFFSET BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE EDGE 1 40' MIN. > ¢ o MIN. I00' RURAL • w n I p OF THE DRIVEWAY MAY BE GOVERNED BY LOCAL ZONING LAWS. c o w I w w DRIVEWAY WIDTH RESTRICTIONS SHOWN PERTAIN ONLY TO THE AREA 0' URBAN WITHIN THE HIGHWAY R.O.W. . I LEDGE w I w 9. DRIVEWAY GRADES STEEPER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY BE ALLOWED I SHOULDER ! AS LONG AS A 20' APPROACH AREA IS ACHIEVED FOR THE VEHICLE TO PAUSE BEFORE ENTERING THE HIGHWAY. EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY -- HIGHWAY ------------------------,--------- 10. CORNER SIGHT DISTANCES, EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY SHOWN BELOW. SHALL BE PROVIDED IN BOTH DIRECTIONS FOR ALL DRIVES ENTERING ON PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM A POINT ON THE DRIVE EDGE OF SHOULDER AT LEAST 15 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY OF THE • MINIMUM UNLESS NO OTHER REASONABLE ACCESS 15 AVAILABLE AND PRIOR APPROVAL ADJACENT ROADWAY AND MEASURED FROM A HEIGHT OF EYE OF 3.5 GRANTED BY THE A 0 T IS OTHER T FEET ON THE DRIVE TO A HEIGHT OF 4.25 FEET ON THE ROADWAY. I EM_ SUCH A5 TRAFFIC SIGNALS, HIGH TRAFFIC VOLUMES, OR FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF HIGHWAY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED WHEN DETERMINING APPROPRIATE OFFSET DISTANCE DETAIL I PROFILE OF DRIVE INTERSECTION ( FILL SECTION ) MIN 10' EDGE OF EDGE OF HIGHWAY ROUNDING EDGE OF EDGE OF HIGHWA 12 SHOULDER TRAVELED WAY rl LENGTH 20'-0" MIN. SHOULDER TRAVELED WAY Ii MIN I P I I p' ) -3% MAX. GRADE —"j _ 15 / M SUBGRADE LINE I �,J<--------------- I I ( SEE NOTE 7 ) CULVERT IF NEEDED TO BE SIZE SHOWN ON PLANS BUT NO LESS THAN 15 "INSIDE DIAMETER . CROWN 'A" PER FOOT. SUBBASE MATERIAL IF PAVED DRIVE : SURFACE WITH 2" ! N IAL I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT. DRIVE CROSS SECTION AT DITCHLINE 24" MINIMUM��B" ON COMMERCIAL DRIVES IF GRAVEL DRIVE :SURFACE WITH 3" noivr AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE. REFER TO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUI( FOR TREATMENT AT CULVERT E ------------- LOCAL GRADING NECESSARY, / AS NEEDED APPROVED /i Dec DATE r J)RE�TOR OF ENGINEERING SUBGRADE LINE \ k DRIVE SIDE SLOPES (DESIRABLE MINIMUMS) • wAr LOCATION LOPE RATE= V > 40 MPH 6:IOR FLATTER URBAN AREAS,OR V C 40 MPH 4:1 DESIRABLE SECTION A -A 2:1 ALLOWABLE DITCH LINE OUTSIDE CLEAR ZONE 2d OR FLATTER S T A N ARI)kS ]F®R IRE SID1ENTIA L �� ��jj jj�� AND jj��►jj�� ��.jj C®1�1Li E"'iIRCIAL DI IVIES GREATER THAN MINIMUM VALUES TO BE USED WHENEVER FEASIBLE S11114T nKTANrF r14ART POSTED SPEED OR DESIGN SPEED ( M.P.H. ) M1141MUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (FT) MINIMUM CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE (1990 AASHTO) (FT) 25 ISO 275 30 200 355 35 225 445 40 275 560 45 325 660 50 400 770 55 450 ! 935 NOTE : ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS WILL BE REQUIRED IF OBTAINABLE CORNER SIGHT DISTANCES ARE BELOW MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCES. ••ASSUMES AN APPROACHING VEHICLE -WILL REDUCE-!TS SPEED (BY CONSTANT OECELERATiON)TO 85% OF THE POSTED OR DESIGN SPEED OF THE HIGHWAY BEFORE OVERTAKING A VEHICLE ENTERING THE TRAFFIC STREAM IT FURTHER ASSUMES THE VEHICLE ENTERING THE TRAFFIC STREAM WILL ACCELERATE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO THE SPEED OF THE APPROACHING VEHICLE. WHEN CONSIDERING ACCESSES ONTO EXISTING HIGHWAYS THERE MAY BE SITUATIONS WHEN A DRIVER WILL NOT HAVE THE MINIMUM CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE AND WILL HAVE TO REDUCE HIS RUNNING SPEED TO ALLOW AN ENTERING VEHICLE TIME TO ENTER THE STREAM OF TRAFFIC. g , 7 A [M L��/ N B A m I-n-, 11037 � it1 k-A4,� 7 � C�Cpc','� ap� - / 5(- �� o /s, �6o/soy = 3D. ya >/3(�?*o ps,6�)6'k 371., x/ 7> z- 3o z a H • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. • Environmental Scientists W N P0. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 FAX: 802-860-1014 July 26, 1994 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Bartlett Brook Proposed Nissan Dealership Dear Ray: Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. (WH&N) has completed an evaluation of the proposed South Burlington Nissan Dealership location on Shelburne Road. A summary of our results is attached. The analysis has indicated that the proposed construction will not result in a significant increase in the peak stormwater discharge rate to Bartlett Brook. Stormwater treatment for the site appears to be adequate, although a few areas which will require special precaution are noted. Should you have any questions on this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ffrey A Nelson Senior Hydrogeologist JAN/ral cc: Steve Vock, CEA [BELAIR.L1/JNELSON) H W N • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. • Environmental Scientists PO. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 FAX: 802-860-1014 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS BARTLETT BROOK/SOUTH BURLINGTON NISSAN DEALERSHIP 1. Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. (WH&N) has completed a stormwater runoff assessment of the proposed relocation of the South Burlington Nissan Dealership using the Soil Conservation Service TR-20 hydrologic model. The proposed site plan, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, and dated June, 1994 has been used to perform the analysis. 2. The TR-20 model computes peak discharge hydrographs from individual subwatersheds utilizing assigned coefficients which represent soil type, ground slope, and land use conditions. Hydrographs from individual subwatersheds are then combined following routing through simulated channel reaches and hydraulic structures. In this way, watershed -wide peak runoff rates can be evaluated. A composite data file containing all existing development conditions within the Bartlett Brook watershed is maintained by WH&N, and has been continuously updated since 1984 as new development projects are proposed and permitted. 3. The design storm for the evaluation has been a 25 year, 24-hour storm event, or 4.0 inches of rain within a 24-hour period. This design has been used in all Bartlett Brook evaluations pursuant to South Burlington Planning Commission directive. 4. The South Burlington Nissan site is located within the drainage area of the North Branch of Bartlett Brook, immediately west of US Route 7. Peak discharge rates have been evaluated both for the property itself and at the point where all runoff from the site enters the north fork of Bartlett Brook. 5. For the existing condition, a single subwatershed has been used to represent conditions on this site. The projected peak discharge rates for the design storm are 11.5 cfs from the site and 151.4 cfs at the North Branch of Bartlett Brook. 6. For the post -development condition, the site has been subdivided into a total of six subwatersheds, reflecting the proposed stormwater drainage patterns on the site. The resulting post -development peak discharge rates are 12.4 cfs from the site itself, and 151.5 cfs at the North Branch of Bartlett Brook. 7. Thus, no significant increase in peak discharge at Bartlett Brook will occur as a result of the proposed development. The small magnitude of increased peak discharge from the site itself is attributed to the presence of silty fill material within the proposed development area on the site at the current time. Only slight increases in projected peak discharge rates occur between this condition and the post -development condition. 8. From the proposed impervious areas on the site, stormwater runoff will occur via overland flow across vegetated areas. Stormwater drainage lines are proposed along the northern and southern property boundaries of the lot. We understand that roof drainage will be directed into the southern drainage pipe. At the outfall of each drainage line, stone fill is proposed. Peak discharge rates of 5.76 cfs and 3.64 cfs are projected, respectively at the north and south culvert outfalls for the design storm. Measures should be undertaken to place additional stone fill, if needed or to establish a good vegetative cover at the downslope limit of the stone fill to prevent erosion at these locations. Of particular concern is the area between the downslope limit of the stone fill at the northern culvert outfall and the outfall of the North Branch of Bartlett Brook located approximately 50 feet to the west, given the steeper slope and absence of good vegetative cover in this area. An alternate solution to provide proper conveyance of stormwater from this area would be to construct a drop inlet to the existing 72" CMP at this location. [ BA R TL E TT. S U MN N E LS O N] / SHEARER CHEVROLE T EXIST. SHEARER STONE FILL ` g C� ' k r T2- CMP INV. 137 + - - - vv tEx MN 2a61 i 1 �'•- s - - _� 1 \ - Z4- 61 CULVERT - -7 RIM-15 00 .,, INV. 140 [-STONE FILL .� INV.. 145.20 l 116 .0 co I r _ 144s�,/ � `• - �� �// i.. �'� _ �__ s�.� _ -. _ _ _ _ .. _. L _. _ _- - _`_� I O � �(TCH 8 x t6 \ S? `\ \ �, ;'J// TOIrR 'ARKING p:1-'GL`7 "APPING SL€EVE �� `'1 -- - — - - -!-' iri// �� •--8 `��� � -__- I1 ''l; / VALVE If NEW C � �'r•� ;--,. 36 N/F ALBERT & RITA _YES ;iI'�f . ,t.� , r r sRAM 5 I H } C ' / ...ti T,f `�i / r •�� •+ .'I.,r a n Z a �� / \ kI,tm I\ i / rl1 + tti _ '_. 'L h11 r 1 p1 `t ` t Q �. _1 ,_ I w rpf 1 'NSE ARCHITECTURAL - > Q Mr ExIST. , j n I J 0 1 OPP PANS FOR PAVED QJ a Wt5 , /,•/ \ \f Ll + = LI+ZA DETAILS n a lax: c rEMENr ; ` 1is 2 ' " r Li lrl: ( 1l - PVC 1-J_ " - 2.36 TYPE I --' ' \ 4'p.� _ -- — I �_1'-t .t 4� S R 2 45.96 -' — 147 — ( F TO NI RIM / --- - - -- ` GR ) TO NISN STONE �— - \� —14 — _ L \Ij G .DE / FILL INV. — :-- _ U�SEI1 CAR '9-c 0 A/ R T l 1�, UUMNSILK ENCLOSURE t \ \\� N �. _ w/ CONCRETE PAD SEWAGE PUMPS 1 / r^ / / 4D`JU1.4 S. F] (T - 6") STATION � \ �Ek/J�\,% � �► s NEW STCRM MH RIM = 145.0 5 73'1514- Ni Lx Yir�t�_E F� UC h VFL`r ` NV = 140A 16.19' L—NEW CB r RIM 1460'�• j i�INV = 141.0 N/F BOUYEA i FXISTFx N/F STATE OF VERMONT / O GRAPHIC SCALE 30 G ,s b / O Rio v'Sa t5 l(/ INV .14G 63 NfITF ';IIP.F1 MEETS AND BOUNDS ARE GA'.Ej-1 (:M1J A 1!1$? '"•lIF"VEti DONE D� � / PINNIJAIA 'ENGINEERING ASSOC. INC. 1HL R4A1.1FX BUILDING 4351 FINC STREET VEPMON f 05401 0 oZ. Summary Table CEABartlet Brook/Nissan July 25, 1994 Watershed Area Curve Tc sq mi Acre Number B-1 0.001721 1.10 59.2 0.0286 B-2 0.000946 0.61 81.0 0.1500 B-3 0.000688 0.44 83.9 0.0155 B-4 0.000475 0.30 98.0 0.0229 B-5 0.000763 0.49 90.9 0.0468 B-6 0.001627 1.04 85.7 0.0273 TOTAL 0.006218 3.98 3 WAGNER, HEINDEL, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-1 Area (sgft): 47970 Area (sqft): 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Project: CEABartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00172 Scale 1 in 30.0000 Hydrologic Cover Area Curve Area Soil Group Description M (sgmi) Number CN ---------- C ---------- Impervious (Paved) ---------- ---------- 0.000067 ---------- 98 ---------- 0.0066 C Open Space (Grass Cover > 75%) 0.000150 74 0.0111 B Brush 0.001504 56 0.0942 Sums: 0.001721 0.1019 Weighted Curve Number 59.2 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Change in Velocity Travel Time Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope (ft/sec) (hrs) ---------- 102 ---------- Paved (SHEET) ---------- - ---------- 11.0 ---------- 6.5 ---------- 0.0044 349.5 Grassed Channel - 7.2 4.0 0.0243 Sum Tt: 0.0286 To, Time of Concentration: 0.0286 (k WAGNER, HEINDEL, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-2 Area (sqft): 26361 Area (sqft): 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Hydrologic Cover Area Soil Group Description (°lo) C Impervious (Paved) C Open Space (Grass Cover > 75%) B Brush Project: CEABartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00095 Scale 1 in 30.0000 ' Curve (sqmi) Number 0.000303 98 0.000262 74 0.000132 56 Sums: 0.000697 Weighted Curve Number 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Change in Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope ---------------------------------------- 162 Overland Flow - 1.5 81.0 Area CN 0.0297 0.0194 0.0074 0.0565 Velocity Travel Time (ft/sec) (hrs) -------------------- 0.3 0.1500 Sum Tt: 0.1500 Tc, Time of Concentration: 0.1500 WAGNER, HEINDEL, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-3 Area (sqft): 19179 Area (sqft): 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Project: CEA/Bartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00069 Scale 1 in 30.0000 ' Hydrologic Cover Area Curve Soil Group Description M (sgmi) Number ---------- C -------------------- Impervious (Paved) ---------- 0.000303 ---------- 98 C Open Space (Grass Cover > 75%) 0.000262 74 C Brush 0.000122 70 Sums: 0.000688 Weighted Curve Number 83.9 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Area CN Change in Velocity Travel Time Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope (ft/sec) (hrs) ------------------------------------------------------------ 117 Paved (SHEET) - 2.1 2.8 0.0116 24 Overland Flow - 40.8 1.7 0.0039 Sum Tt: 0.0155 Tc, Time of Concentration: 0.0155 pow WAGNER, HEINDEL, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-4 Area (sqft): 13230 Area (sqft): Project: CEA/Bartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00047 Scale 1 in 30.0000 ' 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Hydrologic Cover Area Curve Soil Group Description M (sgmi) Number C Impervious (Paved) 0.000475 98 Sums: 0.000475 Weighted Curve Number 98.0 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Area CN 0.0465 0.0465 Change in Velocity Travel Time Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope (ft/sec) (hrs) ------------------------------------------------------------ 165 Paved (SHEET) - 1.0 -; 2.0 0.0229 Sum Tt: 0.0229 Tc, Time of Concentration: 0.0229 WAGNER, HEINDEI, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-5 Area (sqft): 21267 Area (sqft): 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Project: CEA/Bartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00076 Scale 1 in 30.0000 ' Hydrologic Cover Area Curve Area Soil Group Description M (sgmi) Number CN ---------- C ---------- Impervious (Paved) ---------- ---------- 0.000537 ---------- 98 ---------- 0.0526 C Open Space (Grass Cover > 75%) 0.000226 74 0.0167 Sums: 0.000763 0.0693 Weighted Curve Number 90.9 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Change in Velocity Travel Time Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope (ft/sec) (hrs) ---------- ---------- 216 ---------- Paved (SHEET) ---------- - ---------- 3.0 ---------- 3.5 0.0171 15 Overland Flow - 2.6 0.4 0.0104 307.5 Paved (SHEET) - 4.8 4.5 0.0192 Sum Tt: 0.0468 Tc, Time of Concentration: 0.0468 S WAGNER, HEINDEL, & NOYES, INC. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vt Subwatershed: B-6 Area (sqft): 45351 Area (sqft): 1. RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER CALCULATION Hydrologic Cover Area Soil Group Description M ------------------------------ C Impervious (Paved) C Open Space (Grass Cover > 75%) C Brush Project: CEA/Bartlet Brook/Nissan Date: 26-Jul-94 Phase: 0.00163 Scale 1 in 30.0000 ' Curve (sqmi) Number --------- 0.000948 ---------- 98 0.000440 74 0.000339 70 Sums: 0.001627 Weighted Curve Number 2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION Change in Distance (ft) Cover Type Elev. (ft) % Slope ---------------------------------------- 304.5 Grassed Channel - 4.3 85.7 Area CN 0.0831 0.0325 0.0237 MI Q111 Velocity Travel Time (ft/sec) (hrs) -------------------- 3.1 0.0273 Sum Tt: 0.0273 Tc, Time of Concentration: 0.0273 I SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHAIZGE.TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 1 RUNOFF .26 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 --- 12.24 223.97 871.5 STRUCTURE 1 RESVOR .26 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 229.34 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 1 REACH .26 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.81 210.98 13.52 31.47 122.4 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .08 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .98 --- 12.24 36.52 440.0 XSECTION 3 ADDHYD .34 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 206.25 12.24 66.93 196.9 XSECTION 5 REACH .34 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.61 196.75 12.36 65.95 194.0 STRUCTURE 2 RUNOFF .17 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 --- 12.32 53.11 303.5 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .17 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .82 925.74 12.32 56.19 321.1 XSECTION 4 REACH .17 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .80 191.83 12.42 56.10 320.6 STRUCTURE 3 ADDHYD .51 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 --- 12.41 121.21 235.4 STRUCTURE 3 RESVOR .51 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 --- 12.41 121.21 235.4 XSECTION 6 REACH .51 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 192.24 12.41 121.21 235.4 XSECTION 7 REACH .51 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 147.96 12.51 120.36 233.7 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .11 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.40 --- 12.15 88.95 808.7 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .63 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.35 148.19 12.33 160.09 256.1 STRUCTURE 4 RESVOR .63 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 152.77 12.52 150.23 240.4 XSECTION 8 REACH .63 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.33 133.24 12.52 150.23 240.4 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF B- .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.98 --- 11.95 2.14 2815.8 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF 3-y .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.76 --- 11.95 1.50 3124.7 Z XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.28 130.60 11.95 S 2935.0 P Z XSECTION 8 RUNOFF S Z .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.12 --- 11.99 1.73 1818.9 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.78 130.75 11.96 5.31 2426.3 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF E, I .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .73 --- 11.98 1.36 788.2 _N XSECTION 8 ADDHYD 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.88 130.87 11.97 6.66 1702.2 .00 r'e' ` XSECTION 8 RUNOFF 6-to .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 --- 11.96 4.10 2514.1 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF =-'- 3 .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.38 --- 11.96 1.66 2409.6 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.48 130.79 11.96 C76) 0 2483.0 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.10 131.27 11.96 12.40 Is,I 1991.0 XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .63 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.34 133.25 12.52 151.49 240.0 XSECTION 9 RUNOFF .26 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 --- 12.44 162.24 626.4 STRUCTURE 15 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.79 --- 11.96 3.74 2674.2 STRUCTURE 15 RESVOR .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.86 224.26 11.97 3.47 2475.8 1 TR20 XEQ REV PC 09/83(.2) MOST RECENT REVISON: 07/25/94 PROJECT: NISSAN - IJ02i�( gnrzzl fit( 9.2. PAGE 16 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED N (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAR DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.40 --- 11.97 3.69 2171.6 16 RUNOFF .00 STRUCTURE 16 RESVOR .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.39 216.53 12.11 1.97 1161.0 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.33 --- 12.00 1.10 2191.0 XSECTION 20 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.46 --- 12.00 1.04 1489.5 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.60 211.39 11.99 5.21 1680.5 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.56 211.48 11.98 6.36 1767.2 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.38 211.56 11.98 7.46 1734.6 XSECTION 20 ADDHYD .26 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.75 214.24 12.44 164.04 623.0 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .05 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 --- 12.25 29.72 594.4 XSECTION 11 ADDHYD .31 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 202.73 12.40 187.64 598.9 XSECTION 12 REACH .31 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 146.88 12.40 187.64 598.9 STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.98 --- 11.97 16.88 1918.0 sTRUCTURE 13 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 --- 12.00 3.33 1073.4 STRUCTURE 13 RESVOR .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.28 198.14 12.03 3.14 1014.3 XSECTION 18 ADDHYD .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.80 206.27 11.97 19.77 1661.3 XSECTION 18 REACH .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.80 206.27 11.97 19.77 1661.3 SrRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.53 --- 11.96 6.46 2515.3 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.93 145.95 11.97 26.17 1808.8 STRUCTURE 9 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.62 --- 11.96 34.48 2573.5 STRUCTURE 9 RESVOR .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.71 157.89 11.94 32.46 2422.2 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .33 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.72 146.89 12.40 189.19 579.1 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .34 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 146.91 12.39 192.33 563.7 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.78 --- 11.96 2.63 1877.E XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .34 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 146.91 12.39 192.60 562.2 XSECTION 12 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.60 --- 11.97 3.15 1673.0 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .34 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.72 146.91 12.39 192.94 560.1 XSECTION 17 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 --- 12.01 15.89 1369.4 XSECTION 17 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.51 --- 11.98 10.66 2175.2 XSECTION 17 ADDHYD .02 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.92 163.51 12.00 26.38 1598.8 XSECTION 17 REACH .02 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.92 163.51 12.00 26.38 1598.8 XSECTION 12 ADDHYD .36 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 146.94 12.36 197.23 546.4 STRUCTURE 5 RESVOR .36 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 147.64 12.35 197.06 546.0 XSECTION 15 REACH .36 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.73 133.83 12.35 197.06 546.0 XSECTION 15 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.34 --- 11.96 6.52 2303.2 XSECTION 15 ADDHYD .36 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 133.85 12.35 200.78 551.9 STRUCTURE 11 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.68 --- 11.96 3.57 2622.5 1 TR20 XEG REV PC 09/83(.2) MOST RECENT REVISON: 07/25/94 PROJECT: NISSAN PAGE 17 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK M INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SD MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.74 151.51 12.01 2.57 1886.9 11 RESVOR .00 XSECTION 16 REACH .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.74 148.54 12.01 2.57 1886.9 STRUCTURE 12 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.33 --- 12.00 .53 2211.0 STRUCTURE 12 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.76 --- 11.94 2.74 2826.2 STRUCTURE 12 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.68 147.81 11.98 3.11 1943.8 STRUCTURE 12 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.09 148.23 11.96 6.10 2374.2 XSECTION 16 REACH .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.09 148.77 11.96 6.10 2374.2 STRUCTURE 14 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.41 --- 11.95 3.33 3025.4 STRUCTURE 14 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.65 --- 11.95 2.17 3100.7 STRUCTURE 14 RUNOFF .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.69 --- 11.96 2.75 2496.3 STRUCTURE 14 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.50 --- 11.95 5.50 3054.7 STRUCTURE 14 ADDHYD .00 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.19 --- 11.95 8.24 2840.0 STRUCTURE 14 ADDHYD .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.14 --- 11.96 14.34 2620.7 XSECTION 19 REACH .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.14 146.65 11.96 14.34 2620.7 XSECTION 15 ADDHYD .37 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.76 133.85 12.35 202.07 547.2 XSECTION 13 REACH .37 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.76 132.66 12.35 202.07 547.2 XSECTION 13 RUNOFF .01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.25 --- 11.98 8.20 1205.9 XSECTION 13 ADDHYD .38 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.75 132.67 12.35 203.32 540.7 STRUCTURE 6 ADDHYD 1.01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.49 124.22 12.45 350.20 347.7 STRUCTURE 6 RESVOR 1.01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.50 124.06 12.60 327.43 325.1 XSECTION 14 REACH 1.01 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.50 103.80 12.60 327.43 325.1 1 ii6) =F�" �'lF5<1i�lG IrAPIQA�� i FORM 10 20� �� W{T�� EH/H ARM MOUNT GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Arm Mounted Square Form 10 products are sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 watts. The EH units are manufactured from a mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class I anodizing. The H style luminaires are dieformed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products accept 5 interchangeable, rotatable precision segmented optical systems. O R D E R I N G PREFIX SIZE CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS EH 19" 2 3 400MH 120 BRA MF Extruded Fabricated Extruded Fabricated Fabricated TYPE EH H EH H H PREFIX 14" 14` 19" 19" 26` A �� �� 1 /`` 1 i- - l [c� 2 11 0 on 4 SIZE CONFIGURATION 1 (Horizontal Lamp) 3 (Horizontal O (Horizontal Lamp) FM (Horizontal Lamp) VS' (Vertical Lamp) DISTRIBUTIONS See Table Below WATTAGE 120 208 240 277 480 VOLTAGE BLA: Black Anodized 5 AD BRA: Bronze Anodized s CD NA: Natural Anodized 5 HF BRP: Bronze Paint LF BLP: Black Paint MF PC PCR POLY FINISH OPTIONS WATTAGE OPTIONS Housing 14" 19" 26" AD: Amber Drop Diffuser (EH style only) 100 HPS 250 HPS 1000 HPS CD: Clear Drop Diffuser (EH style only) 100 MV 250 MV 1000 MV HF: In -Head Fusing 100 MHz 250 MH 1000 MH LF: In -Line Fusing 150HPS 3 400 HPS MF: Mast Arm Fitter (14" & 19" only) 175 MV 400 MV PC: Receptacle and Photo Control 175 MH 400 MH PCR: Photo Control -Receptacle Only 250 MV POLY: Polycarbonate Sag Lens (Standard on VS) e 250 MH NOTES 1. Fumished with polycarbonate sag lens, VS not available with 14` mogul base units 2. Medium base lamp 3.150 HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp 4. Not available in 480V 5. EH and 26"H units only 6. 175W max on 14` units 0 Gardoo Ughfing 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S. 800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 5101357-3088 @THOMAS FORM 10 PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS FM BE, WE, BH, WH WALL MOUNT GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Wall Mounted Form 10 products are sharp cutoff luminaires for high intensity discharge lamps up to 400 wafts. BE and WE units are manufactured from mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class I anodizing. The BH and WH luminaires are dieformed aluminum with a thermoset polyester Illp" finish. Both products feature 3 interchangeable precision segmented optical systems. BE, BH O R D E R I N G MOUNTING HOUSING SIZE CONFIGURATION qD_44:1_19" 1 Arm Mount B Extruded E 14" 1 No Arm W Fabricated H 19, 1 3 J FM WATTAGE VOLTAGE 40OMH 120 See 120 Table 208 Below 240 277 480 WE, WH FINISH OPTIONS BRA PCR BLA: Black Anodized ° AD BRA: Bronze Anodized ° CD NA: Natural Anodized ° HF BRP: Bronze Paint PC BLP: Black Paint PCR POLY TYPE MOUNTING HOUSING SIZE CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTIONS WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 WATTAGE Housing 14' 191, 100 HPS 250 HPS 100 MV 250 MV 100 MH 250 MH 150HPS z 400 HPS 175 MV 400 MV 175 MH 400 MH 250 MV 250 MH NOTES 1. Medium base lamp 2.150 HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp 3. Not available in 480V 4. WE or BE units only 5. 175W max on 14" units OPTIONS AD: Amber Drop Diffuser (WE, BE style only) CD: Clear Drop Diffuser (WE, BE style only) HF: In -Head Fusing HS: Houseside Shield -Types 1 & 3 PC: Receptacle and Photo Control' PCR: Photo Control -Receptacle Only POLY: Polycarbonate Sag Lens 5 V�Gamico Lighting 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357.6900 FAX 510/357.3088 7i THOMAS !Ml f.L.O(',I< :-K, #7400 i QAJAL HOTOCEI-1- TORK #2100 MOUNT ON WALL PARKING LOT & -EXTERIOR BLDG LT('.i. PHOTOCELL ON TIMECLOCK OFF EXTERIOR BLDG. SECURITY LTG, PHOTOCELL ON PHOTOCELL OFF F LING ROM 4 LA 11. CENIfR 7J TYPE '-SA'_&._'SQ' DE-l"AlL POLE LIGHT SE-, HOLM DOLT oR CAI)WILLD )MPE TO PrM' I' X 4 5* CHAMI ER FINISHED (AADE Of? PAVEMENT WRFACC 0 3/4' CONDUIT F!:XR ANCHOR BITS BARE Cu GRO. MR[ c"I CADWELD— 00NNFCl;0N Vl SCH 40 PVC FRUm Pot 3/4' X 10' Cu TO POLE W/SEPARATE GROUND WRE GROUND ROD "GALVANIZED STILL TO PVC 414 ART. IeERAR CONOUIT CONNECTOR REINFORCING R' 9)S, 12' ON CUJUR. 0 . C> u TYPE *SBB' ATROL DETAL. POLE LIGHT FORM 10 EH/H ARM MOUNT S P E C I F I C A T I O N S GENERAL: Each Gardco Square Form Ten Arm Mount is a sharp cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Units are designed with half cube proportions. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain tight, dust tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Extruded housings (EH style) are offered in 14" and 19" sizes and are composed of precisely mitered anodized aluminum extrusions. Fabricated (H style) units are available in 14", 19" and 26" sizes and are one piece, multi -formed aluminum with an integral reinforcing spline and a single concealed joint. Tops are press - formed with a returned perimeter flange that interlocks with the housing sides. Pressure injected silicone provides a continuous weathertight seal at all miters and points of material transition. D I M E N S I O N S A B' C D EH STYLE 14" 14" 7" 6" 5" 19" 19" 10" 9" 5" H STYLE 14" 14" 7" 2" 2 5" 19" 19" 10" 2" 2 5-- 26" 26" 12 12" 8" ARM: Extruded aluminum arm is prewired and secured to fixture. Assembly is suitable for mounting to pole without requiring access to luminaire. LENS: Mitered, extruded anodized aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Concealed stainless steel latch and hinge permit easy toolless access to the luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form Ten optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve Types 1, 3, 0, FM and VS distributions (see pattern illustrations). The mogul lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell with lamp grip — all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 100MH units have medium base lampholder. All Metal Halide units in the 19" and 26" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. EPA's Approx. Single Twin I Weight 1.1 2.3 2.9 1 30lbs 2.1 4.0 5.5 55 Ibs 1.1 2.3 2.9 30lbs 2.1 4.0 5.5 55 lbs 3.5 7.0 8.9 95lbs 1. VS units with sag lens have overall heights of 9 2. 4-way units have arm lenghts of 6" (H-14) and 3/4" (EH/1-1-14), 13 3/8" (EH/H-19) and 21" (H-26). 9" (H-19). ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20°F. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured within the luminaire, above the reflector system. High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto transformer providing ±10%(MH) and ±5%(MV) power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 1500 or higher. Plug discon- nects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. FINISH: Extruded housings (EH style) are standard with natural, bronze, or black Aluminum Association Architectural Class I anodized finish applied after fabrication. Special polyester finishes are available. Formed housings (H style) are standard with a chromatic acid pretreatment and an epoxy undercoat. The finish coat is a thermosetting polyester baked at 450OF to achieve an H- 2H hardness measure. 26" H style units are also offered with optional Architectural Class I anodized finish. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL wet location and I.B.E.W. labels. Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Gardco's segmented reflector optical system has been awarded U.S. Patent #3746854. Please refer to pole data sheet for specifications and dimensional information. Do not pour anchor bolts without referring to anchor bolt template. 4300 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.8001227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 510/357-3088 ri THOMAS 7911543 / 593 � j ) _;[9j';U4K' GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Arm Mounted Square Form 10 products are sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 wafts. The EH units are manufactured from a mitered extruded aluminum and finished in an Architectural Class I anodizing. The H style luminaires are dieformed aluminum with a thermoset polyester finish. Both products accept 5 interchangeable, rotatable precision segmented optical systems. O R D E R I N G PREFIX SIZE CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS EH 19" 2 3 40OMH 120 BRA MF Extruded EH 14" 1 (Horizontal See 120 BLA: Black Anodized 5 AD Fabricated H 14" �� Lamp) Table 208 BRA: Bronze Anodized s CD 1 Below r 240 NA: Natural Anodized s HF Extruded EH 19" ^-_?` j 3 (Horizontal 277 BRP: Bronze Paint LF Fabricated H 191, Lamp) 480 BLP: Black Paint MF Fabricated H 26" ' 2 Q (Horizontal Lamp) PC PCR FM (Horizontal POLY Lamp) i �_. I �l _'_' _. VS' (Vertical _-- Lamp) 4 TYPE PREFIX SIZE CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTIONS WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS WATTAGE OPTIONS Housing 14" 19" 26" AD: Amber Drop Diffuser (EH style only) 100 HPS 250 HPS 1000 HPS CD: Clear Drop Diffuser (EH style only) 100 MV 250 MV 1000 MV HF: In -Head Fusing 100 MH P 250 MH 1000 MH LF: In -Line Fusing 150HPS a 400 HPS MF: Mast Arm Fitter (14" & 19" only) 175 MV 400 MV PC: Receptacle and Photo Control 175 MH 400 MH PCR: Photo Control -Receptacle Only 250 MV POLY: Polycarbonate Sag Lens (Standard on VS) e 250 MH 00pGm' ��ng NOTES 1. Furnished with polycarbonate sag lens, VS 2661 Alvarado Street not available with 14" mogul base units San Leandro, 94577 2. Medium base lamp U.S. 758 3. 150 HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp 10/357-6900 CA 5510/35 4. Not available in 480V -300 FAX 510/357-3088 5. EH and 26"H units only ri THOMAS 6. 175W max on 14" units ^aM•�r^ t 011k a-'.. T� 1 _ 0 1 2 3 A BCD E F G H I JK L 2 3 4 5 4 0 1 2 3 4 I L L ' 5 4- 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 i ' 0.5 -4 - oc 0.4 .... ti..,N..q.... CZ 0.3 0.2 N C U 0.1 a> 0 STREET.SIDE HOUSE SIDE 0 1 2 3 4 5 �. E Street Width /.Mounting Height .-w. r __t... 5• ... t " .-i.. 400 W .petal Halide Type III Medium Cutoff _o Footcandle Values for the Following Curves A B C D I E F iG H 1-1/1 I J K L 1 15 11 7.1 4.4 2.8 1.8 1 1.1 .71 .56 .44 .28 .18 .11 5.6 18 2 30 22 14 8.9 5.6 3.6 ; 2.2 1.4 1.1 .89 .56 .36 .22 7.4 4T 1 12 9.0 5.8 3.6 2.3 1.4 .90 .58 .45 .36 .23 .14 .09 4.5 20 2 24 18 12 7.2 4.5 2.9 1.8 1.2 .90 .72 .45 .29 .18 6.0 4T 1 7.7 5.8 3.7 2.3 1.4 .92 .58 .37 .29 .23 .14 .09 .06 2.9 25 2 15 12 7.4 4.6 2.9 1.8 1.2 .74 .59 .46 .29 .18 .12 3.8 4T 1 5.3 4.0 2.6 1.6 1.0 .64 .40 .26 .20 .16 .10 .06 .04 2.0 30 2 11 8.0 5.1 3.2 2.0 1.3 .80 .51 .40 .32 .20 .13 .08 2.7 4T 21 16 10 6.4 4.0 2.6 1.6 1.0 .80 .64 .40 .26 .16 5.3 1 35 2 7.8 5.8 3.8 2.4 1.5 .94 .58 .38 .29 .24 .15 .09 .06 2.0 4T 16 12 7.5 4.7 2.9 1.9 1.2 .75 .58 .47 .29 .19 .12 3. 1 40 2 4T 12 9.0 5.7 3.6 2.211.4 .90 .57 .45 .36 .22 .14 .09 30 1 45 2 4T 9.5 7.0 4.5 2.8 1.8 1.1 .70 .45 .35 .28 .18 .11 .07 2.4 1 50 2 4T 7.7 5.8 3.7 2.3 1.4 --- .9 ..58 .37 .28 .23 .14 .09 .06 .9 Footcandles Per 1000 Lamp Lumens 30 1 .13 .1 1. 064 1- 040 .025 1. 016 1. 010 .0064 .0052.0040 1. 0025 1. 0016 1. 0010 * APPROXIMATE AVERAGE INITIAL FOOTCANDLFS Single Units -5.5 MH Spacing x 1.5 MH Width Multiple Units-4 MH x 6 MH Spacing Gardco Lighting 2661 Alvarado St., San Leandro, Calif. 94577 Phone 510-357-6900 19 OaLom euOre q ".m iowr wej eoOre ,aareau /•� ,Y ,A aa>r»o *O O-ZO uva w fl+rKvaa rangy ev ZTVO uraow 'Alsoo m A400 )WA MUM w / �ON VtMMHOVv `eAOMW 1 - NNYVMM INOKAGA i4metrom ve way 3NW127134e WM / NVlrl am � ruMPAm alva art �R uol2uilan8 -oS jo Ain V661 T. 0 711 x01. aD ya z G3ARDW lrIWM A ramie %Q* avv-2 m zT'd �s �u tsti '3s zsooc � v�xv ivy e XRLM" 3Ht %OQ a�O• W z --XV v om�N3 vwv f*u ze 3ovxanm z Aa am AAA" best V NO dWVQ j s 09M v3?1V oMo rle aav same atv sLr ktmxv GWN '19 t tla v3l n 1V1O1 JNOVMA d0 3LYIS =VN A)Q=1 `�. OZ 9 N fYdrl'=74lWIN �S+ZrAt��:1F Z , WIII wim t•Z•Zlf�t•I•YamsmW-prib LF�C�7�&.Plzlb SiW.i1l111maz .tO'1 fJN�Vd `� p 'leDf3 V3JtIM d/N as M / / v , �1 3 / � 1 I � 4 O g� e d 5 t+105i01' ` M ° r ( / r I r v YUV :ay.Ls a 0) / 93J3b VJ.R! '8 1?139"N d/N 0 / / t cc �. A? 1�WMr11V21 MOVY" d/N 131ONA3HO ?J3SY3-IS :MN / o�