Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0017 Brigham RoadrWLRT.FR(lTC A check with Atto_ y Spokes revealed that all bea front properties extend to the mean low water mark Lake Champlain Transportation indicates that the mean low water level is 92.86 feet The stone retaining wall as proposed by Mr. Charlebois along Potash Brook and into Lake Champlain is entirely within his property boundaries. A copy of the drainage study is enclosed. CHARLEBOIS 17 Brigham Road Area zoned C.O. District Section 3.30 Use limitations C.O. District 150 feet depth along Lake Champlain - high water level, elevation 102.5 feet and 100 feet centerline of stream, Potash Brook. Request to construct retaining walls along stream bed and Lake Champlain. Proposal has been reviewed and approved by the Army Corps Engineers - (see enclosed letter) City Engineer is planning a review, his comments will be mailed at a later date. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Zoning Board of Adjustment next meeting agenda items Date: 4/17/84 1) Charlebois-Brook Riprap and Lakeshore Wall 1. Brook should be riprapped on both sides with a channel width and height sufficient to accommodate a ten year storm. If flow velocity exceeds 2 feet per second, the bottom should include riprap. 2. The wall should be constructed at a depth that it will not be subject to frost action. 3. Plans must be prepared and signed by a Vermont registered professional Engineer. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ENGLAND DIVISION, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 424 TRAPELO ROAD WALTHAM. MASSACHUSETTS 02254 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch NEDOD-R-13 Mr. Real Charlebois Charlebois Garage 557 Riverside Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Charlebois: December 2, 1983 This refers to your letter of November 3, 1983 concerning your proposal to place 220 linear feet of riprap with less than an average of one cubic yard per running foot in conjunction with shorebank { stabilization on Lake Champlain in South Burlington, Vermont as shown on the plan entitled, "Proposal for Real R. & Bertha B. Charlebois, 17 Twin Brook Court So. Burlington, Vermont" in one sheet dated "Nov 3, 1983." That work is permitted under Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 330.5 as published in the 22 July 1982 Federal Register and does not require submission of an application or further processing. All work is subject to the attached conditions. A bulkhead proposed as part of the project is not within our jurisdiction. Any temporary fill, such as roadways or cofferdams, etc., placed in the waterway or wetlands for construction of this work and not shown on your plans will require a regular permit. You must still obtain any other necessary Federal, State, or local permits before beginning work. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Douglas Sparrow at 617-647-8150, or use our toll -free number 1-800-343-4789. Sincerely, Raymond Francisco Section Chief Regulatory Branch Operations Division Enclosure �w �s x NATIONWIDE PERMIT CONDITIONS Activities permitted by the 22 July 1982 regulations, 33 CFR 330, without further processing, are subject to the following,conditions before work may begin: (1) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake; (2) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in areas of concentrated shellfish production unless the discharge is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by paragraph (a)(4) of this section. (3) That the activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. In the case of Federal agencies, it is the agencies' responsibility to review its activities to determine if the action "may affect" any listed species or critical habitat. If so, the Federal agency must consult with the'Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.; (4) That the activity will not significantly -disrupt the movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound water); (S) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will consist of suitable material free from toxic pollutants (See Section 307 of Clean Water Act) in toxic amounts; (6) That any structure or fill authorized will be properly maintained; (7) That the activity will not occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System; and (8) That the activity will not cause an unacceptable interference with navi- gation. (9) The following management practices should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable in the discharge of dredged or fill material in order to mini- mize the adverse effects on the aquatic endironment: (a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical alternatives. (b) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons shall be avoided. (c) Discharges shall not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high flows or caus 'herelocation of the water (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound war`.,). 1. (d) If the -discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused. By the accelerated' passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow-, sha,11 be minimized. / (a) Discharge Ch wetlands areas shall be avoided. (f) Heavy equipment working in wetlands; shall be placed on.mats. (g)' Discharges into breeding areas for migratory -waterfowl shall be avoided. W All temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety. Z. April 25, 1984 Attorney Richard Spokes Spokes, Foley & Stitzel P.O. Box 986 Burlington, Vermont O5401 Dear Dick: I will need a letter or memo from you regarding the location of property lines Of people owning property bordering Lake Champlain. The mean low water mark generally is stated in the deed. After calling Lake Champlain Transportation the mean is at elevation 92.861. The issue before the Board of Adjustment is ownership of the beach beyond a certain elevation.,_ My next meeting is scheudled for May 14, 1984. Any questions call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg April 9, 1984 Mr. Real Charlebois 557 Riverside Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Charlebois: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Stree*on Monday, April 23, 1984 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer HW/rmg Mr. Fred. Blois, Ch:9.irman Zoning: Board of Adjustment Dear Sir: I felt rather pressured by time limi- t-tions placed upon mf: at the meeting on April 23. I do not know lust hour many of my concerns were included. I qm therefore pinicing the full, nnper in the hands of the Board, with thF� refer- ences ,appended_. And of course, you should_ n7_eohave the results of the Bartlett "3,ay dr-i Lna.,ge study. There are serious problems in this urea. They have been a long time in the mq�king. I apprecie,te your willin�ne,ss to delve into it more thoroughly. Some tT,Tenty femilits, wilo 'nave built or moved in under the Camp Bartlett 4eeds are: C3ffected. It. is interesting; to note that this "PUD" anticipated South Burlington Con- servation District re,gul t—ions by 45 ,years. Those who drew them up should be credited. with a great deal of foresight, and any deviation should be granted equal foresight. For this reason I urge the Bo.srd to visit the area et their enrl_iest opportunity. Sincerely, 4/2 5/84 I I Statement re. Recuest for wgll in behalf of RAal Char..legois. A geographical, ecologicpl, anal historical perspective is essential for a consideration of this, or any other retition, in Blgrtlett Bay. A complete study of the drainage arena is sal- reBdy in file so my comments have to do with the area from Brigham Road to the I.Pke. This is a dr=tinage basin --a backw- sh, an. overflow s*;fety valve. It must be looked upon as a unit, suite Pstde• frond the property lines. It is bound on the north of Let 21 by a brook , which we c^11. North Brook, which trgverse+s n sma1.1. ravine and drains the high around to the e=)st and north; on the south of lot 20, by another hrook, which drains much more bf the high ground to the enstr. Both cirry much silt dirpctly into the Lake. Together with high Lake levels oc-urring every few ,years, the aree is subject to severe flooding. Wpters co- ing from both directions at once, not infrecauentl,v, can and do back up into the brooks to over 100 feet. Records of Lake levels buck to 1871, show: 31 yesr�- over 101 ft above sea level (flood stage) 10 of t ease since 1968. December 1c3839 normally a low point, was 100.43--s, record Rise was very rppid--almost 2 ft. in four days. Aversge rise in high water years is 6 ft. It was 7.3 ft. in Spring 1.483. There were 4 vrs when It rose 8 ft. Free Press, April_ 23, giv: s water level of 102..1 ft. in 1869 Original development p1Qns for the nr-�!a recognized the no- tentipl for floodin,x. Planned lots (threes all set back about lq0 ft. The lot lines drawn in at a later date, takers two lots dawn to the low water mgrk--50 ft. below high water, or Pt the line as it anpeared in 1020, and which still defines the deeded line. This is approximately at the 98 ft. ses level Line At the time of the m91), front -Pre -is some 85 ft. between brooks, whereas the dimentions in 1964 added up to 12.9 ft., a rather remar- kable change. It is uncertain to what extent this may have been from other than natural, cause^. I do know that around 1958 the north brook was shifted send a treated water line runsfrom the plant in s. straight line to the Lake. This cannot account for over 49 ft. The greater change was, and is, in the channel of the South 9rook, as it traverses the beach. The map shows 9,rproximately 6) ft. of access, whereas now there is less than 15 ft, nt least 6 ft. of it S--ook. Mr. Farrell added 2-6 ft. so th')t he could hnvF a basement. Mr. Farrell was urged to set his house b-nck more in line with that &lready built. This enmplaguilt by Dr. Hoy Bartlett. He ,,knew this gegraphy of the area.) Mr. Farrel -,Its house was only 21 ft. from the high water mark and less than 1r; ft. from the stream bank which is subject to the same degree of flooding. Mr. Farrell left the south wall of the 'house open for access through P garage door. It is clear that a house so located was at high risk. The yearn from 1969 to 1973 were high water years. 'later poured into the basement from the brook. Mr. Farrell had also filled in and seeded the beach area, contrary to the conditions of his deed.. It Tgas all sandy beach the first time I saw It. to my dismay, the second time there was a wall and piles or dirt Rt once cutting off half my virw. The fill below the hich water mark (bea-ch (area) eroded away, most of it coming Ty wry (roint of least r.ests- tence, since lower) to,rethpr with tons of debris. It was necessary for me to rebuild my lawn three time-s and to rPpnir the north brook on two ocensions during these .years. Thus wells or obstructions Dut in to "contain" Lake: Champlain, by restricting the area of overflow simply funnel that overflow onto neighboring lnnds, and erode the banks. South Burlington took steps to protect the Lake in 1_973, passing zoning ordinances requiring 1r)O ft. set -back of any construction along the Luke front and 50 ft. from minor steams leading into Lake. Sadly, So. Burlington hps allowed variances such that this Rood intent is nullified. A recent example, and a rsrti.cularly unfor.tungte one, is the r'aige11Bser wall. extend- ing north into the normal overflow tires, in use for 40 ve qr. c , by some $ ft. This vsrience h'as cremated an ecological disaster, wafting to happen. The house Is incompatible with these surroun- ding and inanrroDriate for the lot size; it is only 5 ft. from the property line, scarcely 10 ft. from the stream which overflows - whenever the water is high. Parenthetically, I might add that for two or three weeks slurry wqs pumped from the excpvation for this house into the stre-m. cutting into they hank, all of which will go into the Lske. Each variance triggers another DeLtition, each property owner seeking to minimize the flood demnge. But it is impossible to recltrict the flow of La'-e Chsmplsin writers, It will, find or make other opening. Even wells will not nr¢vail. Some may remember the collapse of Mr. "ustin's well. The wall replacing it is higher end. further toward Lake. If the original wall, was vulnerable this wall would aappesr to be even more so, end, indeed it is craacked from top to bottom on the south-west corner. eater seeps out from under it where it meets the neighboring walls. Aster also splashes over it when the Lake Roes on s. rampage. Steadily, since IQ29, construction and development hfave ens crosched upon the Lake. People have and continue to build as close a.s .possible, errectinv walls, pushing boulders ggInst the banks, and hoping* for the best. The 'hest is not Mood enough. In the last 15 years everyone has faced severe bank problems, some continuously. If we are unwillinm to look upon the Lake as a precious resource of which So. Burlington has all too little, we will inevitably contribute to the eutropl.icatior of the L,ake--somethinv,, that is already well=-dvanced in this are;. On the basis of the record for the last ill years and in par- ticular, the last 14 years when I hnve hid first-hnr_d experience, no wall should be allowed further lake, -ward- than the 'yank now is, approximately 101 ft. above sea level. Even so, the actual high water marker is back from this at 102 ft. If Mr. Gharlebols' 'Pur- pose is to protect his house, this should suffice. On the south side he needs only close in the w9ll where the door now is, with adequate seal .and necessary fill to conform with that "lready there. No door can hold hack waters of Lake Champlain: There is also an ordinonce► for-Addirp, destruction of vegita- tion along steam hanks. Therr- are about 2r) trees along the bank. In particular a clump of 'hlat-k willows, At the high water mark, will protect the southwest corner of his property fnr better than any xqn-made construction. Thev are rehsiste.nt to sand, flo-ds, y and lure to A very Old PgP.. It would -iprerar that they once defined the natural bank. Any wall will kill most of these trees on this line, either by root dsmnge or smoth,FIring. A numbrr of trees on this lot h-)ve already died from this cause. To the north Mr. r'arrell asked me to keen four feet open and agreed to do the same, for mutual gcces5. As he knew, a v-ritince had been mgde Arior to my pureha-ing next door, in 1963 or 1964, such thgt there is 1e.sc7 than 15 ft. between my nntio (which WqS on a cement slab, roofed over, and screened) leaving onlv gbout 5 ft. clea.rence. I stron7,Sb,ject to be-incx "walled in" and insist that gny wall conform to the' required 15 ft set-backb In summery: I believe_. the Zoning code is a good one. It w-s approvpd by the voters, and offers the best protection to the Irgke. It should be adhered to unless there are- comre!lling regacors to make excep- tlons. There` has nevFr been a wall, 1n this *area, so no grand- flthsr clause Applies. This is one of the very few areas where there is a sandy bench. Trashing the: beach (i.e., filling, allow- ing it to go to weeds, cutting or in,jurinx trr•es, and fal.lure to clean up) will eve'ntugll.v dastrov it. Wildlife is discouraged. Feeding ducks, te. eteri..nv sandniners , visits of .n ,grest blue heron offer much nleasure and partial comnensnti.on for tie work involv- ed in maintaining beach nroperty. Mr. Chnrleboiae boat, a sort of houseboat which must be moored to a dock, taking up much of the beach, is also detrimentgl. 1n th•at it imredes the n,,turral flow from the brook. The Charlebois' are here only on weekends. Thev do not renl- ize, I think, how much protection they have simply bedsa.use I Am in residence full time. I also nay for the: yard light which throws more light on their property than on mine! I once chased three children from th.gt property. They were, trying to set fire to w tr,e•e with a cigllrettel.ighter. He has alr�eady planted•- n hedge along the mutual line by my r1ri.vew9y, within three inches of the line, without consultl.ng me. This makes it necessary to ink snowshort of this hedge and tends to channel the run-off cfown My side and under the patio. He hss slso planted a spruce tree less than two feet from the! line. Ahem mAture this will have an eight feet spread, blocking; the entrgnce to my south side. The wall offers them no nromise of protection, -outs my property end th^t of the neiwhhors in ,jeopardy, impedes my view, spoils the pleasure I and others t7ke in the nntursl environ- ment, mould be aesthetically unancentable. To what rurnose? Owners living on r_ithPr side of the south 'nrook h^ve always been st lowzerhends os to ,lust where th^ bAnk of the brook is. The nrohlem i.s that it is impossible to estahlish n marker in this Brea of shiftinsr, sand. It has +Pen tried several times end slways the. ms.rker has heen w,gshed out ovowr t11e winter or In spring flooding. I fear the onl.v result of rinran bn the lower bench (below the high water mark) will be to litter the beach with ghsrp stones, a dangerous hazsrd to the unwary feet of children, the chief beneficiaries of the beach. This fact Is probably the re.eson that other proV-er-tieO read onlv to the high water. Submitted to So. Burlington Zoning Board April 23, 1984 1) See Lake Chsmr1 yin Newsletter-, Lnke Cho -glair 13msin Study, Lake Chamrlsi.n S1+oreline Erosion Control Foller, All avail- able from L.,,kes Chamrla.in Committee, 14 So. Williams St., Burlington, tel. 658"1414: The OthAr Parer, Sept. 1970. 2) Accordinq to ChAmnl-Ain Water District mnp, Pot,sh Brook is ne-r Swift Street and drains in the direction of Queen City Ps+rk. Bartlett Boy brooks have no names. SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 184 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE P. 0. BOX 986 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986 RICHARD A. SPOKES JAMES D. FOLEY STEVEN F. STITZEL May 7, 1984 Mr. Richard Ward Zoning Administrator 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Dick: (802)862 - 6451 (802) 863-2857 ISAAC N. P STOKES COUNSEL You asked me to research the question of where the boundary line of properties bordering Lake Champlain is located. There are three Vermont Supreme Court cases which address this issue: State v. Cain and Burnett, 126 Vt. 463 (1967) Hazen v. Perkins, 92 Vt. 414 (1918) McBurney v. Young, 67 Vt. 574 (1895) The cases utilize the terminology "ordinary low water mark", "definite low water line" and "the water's edge". None of these standards are further defined by the Court. There is no question that the boundary is the low water mark, but there is a question as to what exactly the low water mark is. We cannot define the low water mark with any exactness, but can advise you that the boundary is somewhere in the vicinity of water's edge during typical summer months. Very truly yp+rS, Richard A. Spokes RAS:mil MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Charlebois Date: 5/18/84 Dick Ward, and I met with Al Pidgeon on May 15, 1984 and discussed the above referenced project. Mr. Pidgeon is a registred professional engineer and is also in the construction business. He has experience in stream protection work. Mr. Pidgeon said that in his pass work experience of this type, it was always protection on both side of a stream. However, it was his opinion that if the channel were moved 5 feet northerly that damage to the opposite bank would be minimized. He said that damage would be as a result of eddy currents resulting from the stone rip rap and moving channel would keep the currents away from the opposite bank. He also recommended that the stone be up to 12 inches in size and placed also in the bottom of channel for a depth of 18 inches. The 18 inch depth also up the slope for a depth of approximately 2 feet. The side slope should be at a 2 feet horizontal and one foot verticial. It was his opinion the concrete retaining wall footings be at a depth to allow a minimum of 5 feet of earth cover to protect it from any possible frost action. He did not feel that construction of the retaining would have an adverse affect on the adjacent property owner. May 25, 1984 Mr. Real Charlebois 557 Riverside Avenue Burlington, Vermmt 05401 Foe: Zoning appeal, 17 Brigham Road Dear Mr. Charlebois: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has denied your request to rip rap the brook located on your southerly line and to construct a retaining wall on your west and north lines. The Board will issue formal findings at a Later date. They generally find that the design as proposed is to large in scale and would create problems to properties of others. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/109 0 LISMAN & LISMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O. BOX 728 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402 802-B64.5756 BERNARD LISMAN CARL H. LISMAN ALLEN D WEBSTER MICHAEL MARKS May 14, 1984 Mr. Richard Ward Administrative Officer Zoning Board of Adjustment City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05401 Charlebois Dear Mr. Ward: OFFICES LOCATED AT 191 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT LOUIS LISMAN COUNSEL Mr. and Mrs. Real Charlebois have sought permission to construct (a) a retaining wall along the north and south (side) boundaries of their home parcel on Twin Book Court, and (b) a retaining wall along their frontage to restrain Lake Champlain. No water course will be altered or relocated by the proposal. The lands owned by Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois consists of Lots 20 and 20A as depicted on a plan of Camp Bartlett, dated April 28, 1963, and recorded in Volume 49, Page 121 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. The westerly boundary of their lands is described in their deed as being the low water mark of Lake Champlain; the frontage is 85 feet, more or less. The Supreme Court has ruled on many occasions that the public interest in Lake Champlain commences at the low water mark. State v. Cain and Burnett, 126 Vt. 463 (1967); McBurney v. Young, 67 Vt. 574 (1895). The mean low water mark is 92.86 feet. Rights of Neighbors to Beach. Deeds to predecessors to Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois contain the following language: Mr. Richard Ward Page 2 May 14, 1984 The lake shore between times perpetually as a all lot owners and for only. Lots 7 and 8 shall be reserved at all beach or lakeshore for common use of leaseholders for bathing purposes The proposal to erect the retaining wall is not inconsistent with that deed restriction. Indeed, the shore will be unaffected. The deed language does not define the depth from the low water mark that is available for bathing purposes. As the construction plan proposed by Walter Adams clearly shows, there is a substantial distance between the low water mark and the wall. Furthermore, Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois strongly believe that this issue is not for the Zoning Board to resolve; if neighbors feel that their rights will be threatened, their appropriate remedy is not to the Zoning Board but to the judiciary. Sidelines. The Edwards property lies immediately north of Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois. The common boundary is defined by reference to monuments and plans; the portion of the wall proposed for the Charlebois' northerly line is set back from the boundary line and does not encroach on the Edwards' land. The Price property lies immediately south of the Charlebois land, and the brook, as it was located in 1963, forms the boundary. Mrs. Price has voiced no objection to the proposal. Public Good. At the close of the prior session of the Board's discussion of this application, Board members inquired whether the proposal would further the public good or threaten it. Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois firmly believe the proposal benefits the public: 1. It will inhibit (and perhaps end) further encroachment by the Lake. 2. It will not threaten use of the beach area by those entitled to use it. It will also protect existing trees and vegetation. 3. It will not threaten neighboring properties or threaten the stability of neighboring properties: as Mr. Adams has testified, it ought to reduce alluvial "fan -out". Mr. Richard Ward Page 3 May 14, 1984 4. The stream flow, having increased over the years, is now eroding its banks, and the erosion is likely to become worse on both banks. According to Mr. Adams, the riprapping proposed by and Mrs. Charlebois ought, in the long run, ��� eneficial to the opposite bank. veryj try liyj yours, Carl CHL/ddp LAW OFFICES OF MARC E. WIENER P.O. BOX 433 70 CHERRY STREET BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402 (802) $63-1836 DAVID T. OLENICR ASSOCIATE June 3, 1983 Mr. and Mrs. Real Charlebois 184 Prospect Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Charlebois: This letter is addressed to you by a group of neighborhood landowners in the Bartlett Bay area. We are among a group of landowners entitled to the use of certain beach front property on Lake Champlain as such rights are described in a Warranty Deed to you by Louis E. Farrell dated July 6, 1977, and recorded in Volume 134, Page 158 of the South Burlington Land Records. The specific language in your Warranty Deed recognizing this right is as follows: "This conveyance is subject to... the right of other landowners and leaseholders in Camp Bartlett perpetually to use the lake shore portion of the land hereby conveyed for bathing purposes..." "This conveyance includes the right, in common with others, to use the lake shore frontage for bathing purposes as described in said condition No. 8 of said Conditional Warranty Deed." These rights date originally to a Conditional Warranty Dted from Marjorie F. Ladue to Roy R. Bartlett and Catherine P. Bartlett dated -January 25, 1930 and recorded in Volume 12, Page 570 and 571 of the City"of South Burlington Land Records. This Deed states that these rightssshall be carried forward forever. -� "The said land is conveyed subject to the following conditions and restrictions, which shall forever run with this land..." This original grant of rights applies to the lakeshore between lots 7 and 8 as said frontage is depicted on a Plan of Lots recorded in Volume 8, Page 597, of the South Burlington Land Records. Rights transferred to lotowners of said land between lot number 7 and lot number 8 (your property and that of Miss Edwards) is as follows: 1;�ijlae lake shore between lots Nos 7 and 8 shall be reserved at all times perpetually as a beach or lake shore for common use of all lot owners and/ oi,leaseholders for bathing purposes only." '11 to x P� 2es z - o - 7 Mr. and Mrs. Real R. Ch__arlebois Page 2 June 3, 1983 To summarize the above, the use of the lake shore is restricted to "bathing purposes only" by all parties who share common rights including the owners of the beach. In short, your use of the beach -is also limited to bathing purposes only. The rights defined above constitute valid existing legal rights to use this area. We expect that after having discussed this with your attorney you have or will reach the same conclusion. Accordingly, we, the homeowners of Bartlett Bay, and our families intend to make full use of this lake front during this and subsequent summers, which use we fully,.expect will' -be free, unrestricted and uninhibited* In addition, your erection of the dock is in violation of our common right to use the lake front in the way intended and provided for in the above referenced Deeds and therefore this dock should not be erected. We are prepared to take whatever legal action is necessary to secure our rights to this area however we remain open to any communication from you or your attorney directed toward an agreement which recognizes the rights of all involved. Sincerely yours, DAVID T. OLENICK DT,Q/tic n WmETIP, L4 �.xP�Res Z- to —A O,A���j a1 �LIL � : G F vt � � r C G f TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE So. Burir'ngum, Vt. /S I9 Receh ed f cr.• rccurd cz _ -1 y s- o'cl(x4 Cl - Arwt �ED -�� ��L �P 943 0 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Real R. & Bertha B. Charlebois 557 Riverside Ave. Burlington, Vermont 862-6283 Name, address of property owner Property location and description Same as above Lot #20 Twin Brook Court So. Burlington, Vt. I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. f" A Hearing Date Signa ur f'Appellant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at , "0 ePX`% ty (day of weer) (month and date) time to consider the following: seeking a from Section e- 3 �� of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to �.!«tM% ••� /�,.� ,. t- R rye-Ju° n. w.r�..c. w� Its OK ' �✓ _r.•� �A .. • • %•,Uw.bx%,Wtan (Vt.) Fr.. Pnm, Sawrday, Apra 7, 1984 1 W''.d 8B 3 N A Z 0