HomeMy WebLinkAboutMS-05-09 - Supplemental - 0050 Brewer ParkwaySOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
(802)846-4io6
December 21, 2005
John O'Connor
5o Brewer Parkway
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: Minutes — 5o Brewer Parkway
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the November
15, 2005 Development Review Board meeting.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOA(Q
15 NOVEMBER 2005
The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on
Tuesday,15 November 2005, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575
Dorset St.
Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; L. Kupferman, C. Bolton, M. Behr, R. Farley, M.
Birmingham
Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; B. Nedde, D. Webster, S. Vock, M.
Johnson, T. Crapo, J. Finnegan, J. O'Connor, J. Hausner
1. Other Business/Announcements:
No issues were raised.
2. Minutes of 1 November 2005:
Mr. Farley moved to approve the Minutes of 1 November 2005 as written. Mr.
Kupferman seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining.
3. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application 4SD-05-85 of Homestead Design, Inc.,
to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 89
multi -family units in 24 buildings. The amendment consists of revising the
building footprints to allow for a maximum of 54 sunrooms (154 sq. ft. each),
Songbird Road:
Mr. Nedde said they have reduced the footprint of the buildings. Impervious area stays
the same.
Mr. Belair said staff has no issues, but only 54 sunrooms will be allowed.
Mr. Kupferman moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-85 of Homestead
Design, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded.
Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining.
Miscellaneous application #MS-05-09 of John and Deanna O'Connor for
lJ approval under Section 3.06(J)(2) of the South Burlington Land
Development Regulations to allow adding an exterior wall to create an
enclosed breezeway which will encroach one foot into the front setback, 50
Brewer Parkway:
Mr. Belair said staff has no issues.
Mr. Kupferman moved to approve Miscellaneous application #MS-05-09 of John &
Deanna O'Connor subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded.
-1-
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAL
15 NOVEMBER 2005
Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining.
5. Miscellaneous application #SD-05-10 of Rosalie Sprout for approval under
Section 12.01(D)(2) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations
to allow a 20'x20' addition to a single family dwelling, 76 Bartlett Bay Road:
Mr. Belair advised that this application was withdrawn.
6. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-79 of
Eighty Midas Drive, LLC for a planned unit development consisting of: 1)
razing a 2526 sq. ft. general office building, and 2) constructing a 8534 sq. ft.
general office building including a drive-in bank, 80 Midas Drive:
Mr. Vock and Mr. Webster reviewed changes made since the last hearing. They noted
the Board had suggested sitting down with the Director of Planning & Zoning and staff to
see how all the "pieces" in the area fit together.
The entrance to the City Center is still undecided pending information from a traffic
consultant. Keeping this in mind, the applicant has agreed to take the originally proposed
vertical "circle" (stairs and elevator) and pull it into the corner of the building. This will
create an entrance for the upper 2 floors. There will now be entrances on the east and
north sides of the building. There will also be no parking in the front yard. The
landscape plan has been revised to screen parking (a mixed evergreen buffer).
Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to commit that what they have shown is essentially
what they will build. Mr. Johnson said they are still discussing the bay windows as they
may be too expensive. Other than that, they committed to the design shown.
Mr. Vock said that another issue had involved access for fire equipment. They met with
the Fire Chief who gave them templates they had to meet. Since the original design
didn't meet these templates, they moved the building forward about 3 feet and moved the
dumpster and eliminated one parking space. Mr. Vock said they are comfortable that all
turning movements now work for cars and fire vehicles.
Mr. Vock said the building is also shorter by 1 foot 8 inches on the first floor. They also
squared a corner of the building and eliminated the overhang. This reduces square
footage by 600+ square feet.
With regard to lighting, Mr. Vock said the house shields work so that no light exceeding
regulations will go off the property. All lights on the perimeter will have house shields
on them.
Mr. Vock showed a new walkway into the building.
31 parking spaces are provided. There is a waiver request for 5 spaces (13% shortfall).
-2-
J
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
November 8, 2005
John O'Connor
5o Brewer Parkway
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: 5o Brewer Parkway
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting
and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting
on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room,
575 Dorset Street.
If you have any questions, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Betsy McDonough
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
(802)846-4io6
November 7, 2005
John & Deana O'Connor
5o Brewery Parkway
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Property Owner:
Enclosed is a draft agenda for the November 15, 2005 Development Review
Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property.
This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a
public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development.
Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory
proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local
development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies
that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering,
through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of
the proceeding."
If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call
this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the
scheduled public meeting.
Sincerely,
&�' '
Betsy cDonough
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
l
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
(802)846-4io6
November 7, 2005
Carleton H. & Patricia Klinck
47 Brewer Parkway
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Property Owner:
Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com
for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November
15, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal for
development that abuts your property.
Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory
proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local
development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies
that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering,
through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of
the proceeding."
If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call
this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the
scheduled public meeting.
Sincerely,
C M
!BettsyDqoough
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 31, 2005
\drb\misc\oconnor\misc.doc Plans received: October 21, 2005
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION #MS-05-09
O'CONNOR- 50 BREWER PARKWAY
Agenda # 4 Meeting date: November 15, 2005
Owner/Applicant Property Information
John and Deana O'Connor Tax Parcel 0260-00050 R
50 Brewer Parkway Residential 4 Zoning District
So. Burlington, VT 05403
Location Map
wr mwtiiiwrer%r/=•iarcazrir�Gvncsrrlilw�> Mwr%,i ;Mixi exam zxawr►, axQvr1M1►rww+'r w[
l 3
40
46
48
,It Subject Property
Aso
71,
47
52
} sz it
** no aerial is provided because the lot is heavily wooded and difficult to discern from the
orthographic imagery.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\misc\clements\conditional use doc
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
John and Deana O'Connor, hereafter referred to as the applicant, are seeking miscellaneous
approval under Section 3.06(J)(2) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations to
allow a 55"x147" breezeway enclosure to encroach one (1) foot into the required front setback,
50 Brewer Parkway.
COMMENTS
Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose, and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein
as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 21, 2005 and have the following
comments.
CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional
use shall meet the following standards:
1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned
character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan.
Staff does not feel that the proposed addition is in conflict with the planned character of the
area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the
proposed use is located.
According to Section 9.01 of the Land Development Regulations, the Residential 4 Zoning
District encourages residential use at moderate densities that are compatible with existing
neighborhoods.
Staff feels that the proposed addition is in compliance with the stated purpose of the district.
3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely
affect the following:
(a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities.
The proposed addition will not adversely affect municipal services.
(b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is
located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses.
Staff does not feel that the proposed addition will adversely affect the character of the
neighborhood. The addition is not proposed to be located any closer to the road than the
existing house and garage. By enclosing the breezeway, the house will now be flush across its
frontage on the public right of way.
One concern with allowing encroachments into setbacks is that it might allow other dwelling
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\d rb\m isc\ocn n or\m isc. doc
units in this neighborhood to encroach into the established setback, under Section 3.06(J) of the
Land Development Regulations. However, because the proposed addition is not located any
closer to the road than the existing structure, this will not change the setback standards for
neighboring homes.
(c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity.
The proposed addition will not affect traffic in the vicinity.
(d) Bylaws in effect.
The proposed addition is not in keeping with applicable regulations, specifically the front yard
setback requirements outlined in table C-2 of the Land Development Regulations.
(e) Utilization of renewable energy resources.
The proposed addition will not affect renewable energy resources.
(f) General public health and welfare.
The proposed addition will not have an adverse affect on general public welfare.
Pursuant to Section 3.060)(3) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional
use shall meet the following standards:
Encroachment of a structure into a required setback beyond the limitations set forth in (a) and
(b) above may be approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of
Article 14, Conditional Uses, but in no event shall a structure be less than three (3) feet from a
side or rear property line or less than five (5) feet from a front property line. In addition, the
Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed encroachment will not have an
undue adverse affect on:
(a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties;
The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on the views of adjoining
properties.
(b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties;
The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on the access of sunlight of
adjoining properties.
(c) adequate on -site parking; and
The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on adequate on -site parking.
(d) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING
\drb\misc\ocnnor\misc. doc
The proposed addition will not have an undue adverse affect on the safety of adjoining
properties.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-
05-11, as submitted.
Respe f y subm' e ,
R J. Belair, Administrative Officer
Copy to: John and Deana O'Connor, applicants
-•+ •- Div-, .. ,.' ,,. s ,o_...._. ,_.�. .{, -,,._ -
..h.. " '„ 7 ... .,, 1 4 F +
l
i�-, . - .,.... , . i , .,� iF._ .... - ., r -r , ,,, �._...�._ _ �•- , _ _,S'.,.,...-F,. C{ ..,�.., ,.J � ,.,.,.. ,. .� .,y.. ,�i,�, <..�,_„ � ...j-...x.- •* ,.,. p, ,., ..4. _. � , �.,�. .b _ � w ,,.. ,,. S.,_ � i " ,- __`
,` , t ._ ! t "{ . i Mj J N k t } � c 1 V i i , _y = _.� 4 1,.i 1 •
i.k... .r .., .C.. .,�,. • �.�, _.•r_ x,. _�... .1.. .� ,.,�.,. ..F, _.. }Y.. .A. ... }. ,..�, ,.,. r._...,. ,j ,. ,G..,�,..�.,-,�. _„�..1. ...,.. �,, ..gyp.. .. ,.�.. �.#, .._.-f.. ....�}.._ e.. _'.,.. .:. ,{w....�. ,, t..._ ,_.� �_._ ��
N - r _ N a 1 . S_ >«. f _ r .,... ,,...'^_ t 7 •�i gg . xr p _c N zN y 4�.. � .,.
sir � t �-_. I r '; s i v S ? f t i ......j � y i i "• j ,
.#..__.g-,,.. ,}.,,._,�...,.. -.5 ,...M �, _p...,,h,...,�,...�,.,,.,�....,.T.t•.,..,_,j.._.�,.r.}..,..k...,. �.. _..f.....�...�..,,,.(.,.,.�._..y..,,.,�,..,,�}._. _,r.,,.,.,_ 8,...y, .,. d,,...,3f....,..�....{,. y.,... ,,.¢. _..,.p, ...,i.,_.� .` ,�L, y„..
i Y Y . �,~~ - ;� i ! n E 1 Y 1 r t e •�• r i k f 4 � �Y.# t 11 e t k ��w � i r 1 ! V �, f m� i ,
,. � .-..,r.. ..,....�,_ ..�....�.j_..,p_ .,,. .i• _.�,..,F., �. .,,' ,.-,.._..._.�„ _��m_.�_ ..i.._�._.,+,_.. W _.n--..f., _.,S{,_,-k_ .,,a....., .,:, r -�-_� _.AS �. .r._ _.» , ..5,....�j_ ..i�. �, ,. ,
s
t ,w a N � 4 ,i �• s „S R F,,,. I A A! RI 4 � ! •` f Q ^ i 4 1 { i r h � 9 1 .. N ,.<,.ye, .,,N 1 V
,p._..i.._„<....,y.. ,�.,., ,,.,_y� _' .L._., »�,<. 5 �_..,. ,' .�. ,�5.,.: .�•.,_��„•..,rh,_-.� .,...�._,.,.�..-+ k ,..�....,�. .�..,k.. _,�..,.,j,,.,.,.., w....�__,x.-.,<.�r. J �. �-;.._,m..,... .,�, .;;,..,r.., �. �... ,,,
� :..,.-{r_ ��_ ' ._ .... ^� f. _- { ,r, --... .,. "1_ _+' `• "f �__ �. - ,Y., f _.,N,.-...J-._i_... ^. ._ 1 � .., j.A _ ti _ S k d + .. " v __. �... r.. ... ... -... r � �_..,,, ,.
, i 7 � .Y».. w-. .,.. � .•AID, i f ^ I ,.-_'.,.,..� �...._.,. � 1 k .W,.<�:,..,. ( r..._,L+.,.. �a'.� � r f r y ...h �„W_...... '�
5 f'_e. .`,
.�.__: _ _.{_ ,k .,.., .,.�. _..�,..� ,.t.,._.� ; ..i,..,.�,_.�._M;,,._.a,,,._L..•r,.__,-,:_._i._..>�._._.,..,,.i._...5..i„ ._,.i �. .... A,_._. , �=_.l,.m +.. . ,..
4....,.-._�......�,....,.,,4,.4,..,{.._^4,._.i.....,k.,
? 4 1 + r Y k 4 z 4• Y + i 1 i t Y s i ! r S x S , 1 c i k �}� � A Y
4__k,<_.,.,y.._..''o-,.._.1.,_..�i,_.,�_}.
f t
t 1 t 1 f Y
Y _ 7.1
,_
.. y._�, .5..} y ..� ...✓r.. j ,j. �,..i
W +~ ! t i 4 ! i u••� ,.,.{.,_, A f 0 i •• ` •» 1 k �M _ i 1 ( '.,. _ k �• i• N f t 1 ~ F }
i'"."�'. ,f_.....�._.��_.,t ,�,,,.�,.-,.__.�,...,�r ...�.,...{._.�.._»p.._.„pi.,..�,_....�_..�.,_..F. ` _'�,._..C._.,...�,...,.+.,,.r.,_.•Y-'-'�3j�'�'Y- f-._ .:.j..._<L.., �. . ".,g. (. _ -�'.., .�
�i 6 _ 't 1 .'.. _ ..N ,.,y f i Yw i t !' 1 8 ➢ ., .. E ti i .... " 1 "'. ,. �.
- S %i i } G �i �� i f ' is %� �u +� Y 1 •; r rv4 y� '� a � � ^
•, � I_.7�...,r.#yy�:.,_t--,w,,........1, ..,, Y,.. .,y. .., .�„F,E.., i.. ., �I,. _..f_�>� �C .,-+(((���?i•, ,.� V I ;. .r .t ,..,.�
• � f 1 ad t » r , f .�,
.p,._.,.,. k...... ._ .._(.. _..A..r.>t.. _ ��_.... ._.i. -F _., .5... _ _,�._„ j......_ . ,._;.. __ •tr._.,.�, .t,.....,.p, .. { _ .k..,. k a��.. a. f_ _ -�,. ..r „ ... ,; .,..{. _
• _ r. «;.k,.,S .. rt.. . _ _.h m,_ . � .. i-- •.. ,,.« .... �.....'i.,.,_ q � __ W.....�' ....y. , m.. _ y w , .» }...,._. { _ _ M,.,.._ M � �.•• .. I w . ., ...y „ _ , .
...i,�,_„i,.,...4 ,, A..,.,�....�....,:. ,,f.,
a,.a
,,.{._„_; r
•v .... _. � ` - . 5,,,_...,j,r. ,1,, i , ,�... .....,p, _ ti , �...,.. �..,,, �, ...,, . ,,.�... ,.;w .... 1� w !!�` Y �w
-�.. _ .:, _y.,.,.. .,.. .,�i_ ..,� _{.,.. ,.-7„ _.y,. .�,.. .,{.. ... ..,.... _.t.... ,._f_,. .�,_...� >, -�. �-,_i'_ 'r _k.,, .,.�. �#.-,._:�_ � 1. _„},_...: i.. _..y',...__�, wi ., ,�.,, .t _. . l•Q` r. .�j.,
rFn
�_..,,y...:• . _1 � ...i,,.. W r Mh ..�..,, �.! _ ,. 1,�„ . h . ,�,1.,,,,-...F,.,.,i.. _'� t � � j ) z l d'\ ,, ��1}
N=k•� z „ a,• -i "y.�- ...#.,...'�. ,.,...-,e<... E..--.aH � _ .,f .- ,.L.., i,....
. .. .. __. —-- _ :i,'• '".+xr: •.ten._ •�e�, -,.. _ _ .{ _ _ _ - _ __ _ - 1 .. rt. ..
.n
.. r
kl
777
-
•tv,/-_-7
- - - .v�•�a•+ � 'n. _ ._,� .-_ram.,.:-._ -� _..__�-_, _-......,.,. ._.- ..-_- _____- � _ - .
Ia—
.'y', :- .r.t-:^. _r:L'.t `� '•+ _ i7. ._tee"-T'•-, �,'' r=�— - — .._ .r- +'wa,ti�.�--� ._.
-'CTd"Y� ...•"-14 iR4r yrs= ~rK - , �+•rl.. ,t _ _.lS,a� _,h_ enu-,- ... _ - . - _ ... _ ..
- ' °' =.ram t�-•�9''',=�G. �• • tis.-"^ ' - __ _ .. r. - _ .. - _ _ - '- - �,., - - '' _ -
-x
y , -
Jx
/
K+•�•--�.�__--_'-_--_-'__`•_-_. _Y�`-ter...._+—+_-_�_-_ _ —_�-_. ._.—y.��—_——___•-_r_�"T,_.-en,ss--F`r.�4_-.•`[:.+rKw!�!b_�i T•_•�'�...
:TokA 0 �,nnal
P
1kW�y
1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
November 16, 2005
John O'Connor
5o Brewer Parkway
South Burlington, VT 05403
Re: 5o Brewer Parkway
Dear Mr. O'Connor:
Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above
referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on November 15,
2005. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Betsy M onough
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Encl.
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Interested Persons Record and Service List
Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has
certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing,
there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person
status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The
DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person
who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision
rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having
been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to
the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the
appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c).
HEARING DATE: I lo&i a tI " gous-
NAME
MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST
/C /ylAI<J
'/7LA
U
A226wf k4
V( CKUjVY11�WX VV
1 (.� (�rou2
�� -o,�,J ►`
go
c
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPA. RTMENT OF PL-AM',f ING & ZONEN G
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
Permit #&�--
APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the
requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your
application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board.
I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning &
Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must
appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is
to off -set the cost of the hearing.
Type of application (check one):
( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of
Violation
( ) Request for a conditional use
( ) Request for a variance
SjC) Other
PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY):
/v/�rI
WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ?
-- &/0
1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #):
Tolazid becella 81w el- AL-f .Jc)4r ill- os-y c 3
2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) V0 /
3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone and fax #)
'we ccs � ] ab-ye.
4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name,
mailing address, phone & fax # if different from above):
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ,i0 /:X tjk
6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0.7-60 —0od S-0 _A
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate
—N.
B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and
existing uses to remain): , H
C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing
building to remain): tt jj
,P-kisOn
D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing
buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine):
,13 4-11 11 Z--s /L rt, '^'I&A ,UVAf
E. Number of reidenU
remain): e - ,z,14
(if applicable, new units & existing units to
F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office
vs. non -office employees): NA
G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically
requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable):
i ,-,0[e, ca j lies �r/e w(// "/- � `,Qg�
8) LOT COVERAGE
A. Total parcel size: — 39, 660 Sq. Ft.
B. Buildings: Existing .�3 % I Z / 0 3 Sq. Ft
Proposed .4-,3 % / 2l 0 3 Sq. Ft.
C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc)
N� Existing % / Sq. Ft.
Proposed % / Sq. Ft.
D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: 64 Sq. Ft. *
* Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications
for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects
disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of
Environmental Conservation.
9) COST ESTIMATES
A. Building (including interior renovations): $ 3 4Q0
B. Landscaping $ O
C. Other site improvements (please list with cost):
N14
10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC:
A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): X4
B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 104
C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): Aid
11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION
12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION /Vlf
13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE L'01 -E
14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting
property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a
separate sheet of paper if necessary):
Path
'kl,,,k,
y7 #,,e
S' f(-11'srt
# Susan
�lar1f"I
, q 9,'ewew Pk,>-
Ae,( /P,_"JA `/ el
Ac-p, -
i f1 i,fiF Ile.
V,,h TKi-%o vc,4 /
3,z
C
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been
submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
A/ fV
GNATURE OF APPLICANT
S NATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMISSION: �(J-2J
U
REVIEW AUTHORITY: [Development Review Board
❑ Director, Planning & Zoning
I have reviewed this application and find it to be:
P
COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete
VICK & MADDOCKS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P. 0. BOX 8502
ESSEX,VERMONT
05451-8502
WARRANTY DEED
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, NOLTING FAMILY,
LLC., a Vermont Family Limited Liability Company, and HAROLD J. NOLTING and ANN E.
NOLTING of the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont,
Grantors, in the consideration of TEN AND MORE Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by JOHN
J. O'CONNOR and DEANNA L. O'CONNOR, of the Town of Jericho, County of
Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantees, by these presents, does freely GIVE, GRANT,
SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantees, JOHN J. O'CONNOR and
DEANNA L. O'CONNOR, husband and wife as tenants by the entirety, and their heirs and
assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of
Vermont, described as follows, viz:
Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Nolting Family, LLC, by Warranty
Deed of Harold J. Nolting and Ann E. Nolting, dated December 16, 2003, recorded in
Volume 652 at Page 177 of the City of South Burlington Land Records.
Also, being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Harold J. Nolting and Ann E.
Nolting by Warranty Deed of Max B. Davidson, dated June 29, 1965, recorded in Volume
73 at Page 382 of the City of South Burlington Land Records.
Lot No. 57 of Brewer Parkway Extension, Section B, as is more particularly described on a
Map or Plan of Lots of Austin Realty Corporation of South Burlington, Vermont recorded
in Volume 28 at Page 84 of the City of South Burlington Land Records.
Commencing at a marble monument, which constitutes the southwesterly corner of Lot No.
57 (incorrectaly described in former deeds as the south easterly corner of Lot No. 57) and the
northwesterly corner of Lot No. 50 (incorrectly described in former deeds as the
southwesterly corner of Lot No. 50), a distance of two hundred fifty-three and eighty-two
hundredths (253.82) feet to an iron pipe nce deflecting to the left with an included angle
of 131 ° 27' in a northerly direction on h dred sixty-four and twenty-two hundredths
(164.22) feet to an iron pipe; thence de cting to the left with an included angel of 90 ° 5' in
a westerly direction seventy-six and twenty-seven hundredths (76.27) feet to an iron pipe;
thence deflecting to the left with an included angle of 128 ° 19' along the boundary of Lot No.
55 and Lot No. 57 in a southwesterly direction three hundred forty-one and sixty-six
hundredths (341.66) feet to a marble monument; thence deflecting to the left with an angle
of 84 ° 54' along the northerly line of Brewer Parkway one hundred eighteen (118) feet to the
point or place of the beginning.
Grantors, Harold J. Nolting and Ann E. Nolting convey all of their life estate reserved in the
above referenced deed.
Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof, and the
references therein contained, all in further aid of this description.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all said granted premises, with all the privileges and
appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantees, JOHN J. O'CONNOR and DEANNA L.
O'CONNOR, husband and wife as tenants by the entirety, theirs heirs and assigns, to their own use
and behoof forever; And the said Grantors, NOLTING FAMILY, LLC., and HAROLD J.
NOLTING and ANN E. NOLTING, for itself and its/their successors and assigns and administrators,
does covenant with the said Grantees, JOHN J. O'CONNOR and DEANNA L. O'CONNOR,
their heirs and assigns that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises,
and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM
EVERY ENCUMBRANCE: except as aforesaid; And It hereby engages to WARRANT AND
DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NOLTING FAMILY, LLC., and HAROLD J. NOLTING
and ANN E. NOLTING, hereunto sets its hand and seal this 27th day of January, 2005.
IN PRESENCE OF: NOLT NG FAMILY, LLC.
By:
Harold J. Nol ing
Its Duly Authorized Agent
Harold J. Nolting
Ann E. Nolting h )WZ7-
By Harold J. Nolting, Attorney in Fact
STATE OF VERMONT )
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, ss. )
At Burlington , Vermont this 27th day of January, 2005, Harold J. Nolting,
Individually, as Duly Authorized Agent of NOLTING FAMILY, LLC. and as Attorney in Fact
for Ann E. Nolting, personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and
subscribed, to be his free act and deed, the free act and deed of NOLTING FAMILY, LLC., and
the free act and deed of Ann E. Nolting.
Before me
tary Public
My Commission Expires: 02/10/07
\MADDOCKS
T LAW
502
MONT
<fSL
Rage— .-:...:.....:................
i). Davisor.
WARRANTY DEED
............. Know All Men by these Presents, that
TO
H.t Tip _ d 1-ol i nE and- Ta
Tz- _ B. Davison
-
t'.?f ....
.......... ...._................_.._.... ............... ....._...._......................_..._...._..... .
Lamo, lle
of Sii tk h�gidd for r-' stawia . ..in the County of .............. and state of Vermont ...... ........ . ...... .. ............ Grantor ,
me and mare-------------- ----------- ----- m
in the consideration of ...- paid q
Dollars ald to ............., ............... ....fall satisfaction b
9.rol^ J. 1 -j1t.i,rxg and Ann E. NoltinF, }?as Nand a-.d wife.
_ ..._ ..................... ....... .
of'SwRif Brirlii3 iiiny .... in the County of ChKiigd&T. Q'.qy4Lh.ogA..._......... and State of p.......... J17%a_........ _.. GranteeP , by these presents
do freely Give, Grant, Sell, Convey and Confirm onto the said Grantee...... g_X'911 J.r.._...lTolting.and ._.i nni ._E,, . Noltin,o,,_,iluSb�.nd anti
i� lfe. as tgnar_t s by the entiret,T7' ---- - and. ...iz'............helrs and assigns forever ,
SSI S er
a certain piece of land in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz.:
T,a� - of _reT-er Fark°-ray E..ension, Section P, as is moreNa- vicularl,i defined oil a I'iap or Flan
;t of _Austin Realty corroration of South Burlinrto_r,,ye=orit recorded in Volume 28. --ge 8L
ci en s f the `L`ow ^` '-nth Bur lrgtoY7. wh1r,,7 :s more -on gr� y raeseribed =s
_ ��� man_. Yo rd a_ i - - . - ,
Co7IIr'ncinr; at a marble monument, which constitutes the so-vthwesterl'* corner of Lni, ;T - (incorrecti`y'
(Iese.ricea in former deeds as the southeasterly corner of Lot ='57) an the nerthwesterl-, corner- Of
T,ot 7`450- 'incorrectly described in forner deeds as the south-!es`erlti currier of Lot =50); a distance
of two h-mdred fifty --three and e_ghtV-twoehundredths f25i.82? feet to air iron pipe, thence deflecting
to the left with an included angle of 131 ,' in a -1_rther'.R direction one h-mdred Si_'t-�-four and
hi=T^nty-t:'o lmdred:.ns (164.22) feet tc an iron pine; then.^. deflectirLc; to the left iritr, an included
a.rmle Cf ;�'51 in a westerly direction se"rent-y-tit: am,r t,;ent.--se—n b+=1 redths i 6.2() fee'.:. to an
i=or_ uixe• thence deflecting to the left witi-, an incladei angle 12Aa l9° along the boundary line
of Let ; 55 and -•ot ;r; i in a sotithwesterIv direction three hun,3red.�f o--ty-one and sixty-sil- hundredths
1111 a } feet to a marble mono iont, thence deflectinr7 to the left ` `tb an included angle of 841, 5111
a 1 17- tre northerly line of Brei-ae-r Fark't-,ra7 one hundred eighteen l 1 8 i feet to the pof-nt or place of
-ec9pnirc-0
nil a_a_' _r' t the sare larr.ds and pren2:i!es ennz7e-ied -�;w the --:'thin rirartor by the ''Jarranty Deed cf,
Patricia T . Her a r date' the 112th le _ -f _ --� and ?ecord 1-11 Vol -me 13, `age 28( of Said
0aid Nrer is3s are subject to protective co,7e-,a„ts and a.e rre-,eats set frortn in the deed of Austin
P a ls_z pnratlon 10 G. Ilcrma.n and Patri ci e - , `_r?Frbe-F, d-atod Tile 22nd d9." Of Tarn_. 1954. and
record ir, 'rrlume 35. Page 100 of said Land Records.
F, r net ^P is lief eh-- I.._n_Ne to the above -described _ladaT_7:1 J-ed and its record. and the d'ed's a;,_ their
= ace -a YACn a5 the- -'p _'efa^2=e�. to in further aid cif this dese_.rintion.
i'he -o opert- hereby conveyed is no Far- of the 'Trantol'lo honestead prcrIS6s.
ra==As shall be prorated as of t'_?e date of delivery of this deed..
To Have and to Hold said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee.S? Harold J. l!oltinpr
ar d Alin ilrt_jting,... h-as and wi er._a..s.._tenarli,s.by the. en' evy� .�P.d their- - .-.-... heirs and assigns, to
.... ................................... - - - -
their o-n use and behoof forever. And ..'..... the said firantor.3,. 1 ..£. Da-,7i son- .
............... _ ..................................................... .
for inyse.l.-
f and heirs, executors, and administrators do covenant with the said Grantee.'.-. _Ka� o'I(ft . �.s.._. g-tinZ and
Ann EJ. licltinF. husbe.nd amid .fife their-
................ ..... heirs and assigns, that until the ensealing of
these presents T. an _ the sole owner of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are Free from
every encumbrance,.. .except.. the abovenro�,ec.ti-ve coye.nants,.-and ............. ............................. ...
..................... ... ....... ............... ..... _....... .... ...... ... .......... .... .... .......... _.... .......... .......... _._.......... ............... .......... ............ .... .................. ....... ..I.... .... ...... ........ ..._......... ... ..._... ......... ..........
h-reby engage to Warrant and Defend the same against all lawful claims whatever eX.Q.ep.t•.....a.s.....P-1)Qv.0......'..ti.2.t.eJ......... ................ ..... ............. .... ...... ...... ........... ........
.......... .._........... ............-.........................................................._..................................._..........._..........._...............I....................
In Witness Whereof,
1.. hereunto set.. rn?'.....-_......hand
........ ................. ....... .... ......... .... ... ........
and seal this . �:=...' �............... day of......._`:�la
... .
A. D. 19.��?.
...... ............I.=°«... .... ..
.... a;zls- ^. SEAL...
L. S.
IN PRESENCE OF
_...... ..... .... _................
..........
_...... ...... .......... ................
.......... _.............
L. S.
Juanita LaRose
...............................
L S
Jud:Ltn...Ls.npbQ.p,r .......................
...............
L. S.
At 1lor_ is t o,an ..this 2 a th
day of
y
STATE OF VERMONT
LAMOILLEA.
J„ne 61,
D. 19.-2....... ........................... ....... ...._.............-.. .... .... ...................... .................
UAMAMM COUNTY, ss.
Max B. -Davison
personally ?ppeared, and.. h`..-.-.......
acknowledged this instrument, by.............lim.
............. ..maled and subscribed, to be..._.....shYs... ..... _......... free act and deed.
Juanita i?. Lat'os e cal
Beforeme.............................._................._............_.....,....._............_..__.._..._....,.,.......
Notary Public.
I hereby certify that U. S. Revenue Stamps to the amount of s.3
were affixed to the foregoing instrument and were duly cancelled.
n • ni�