HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1525 Shelburne Road(71TY Oi' SOUTH BURLINGTON
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Antonio Pom, •erleau Box 6
69 College Burlington, Vermont 05402
2)
APPLICANT
(name, address, phone #) Hobie Richards & John
Rao II
DBA
Tinguini's
Fresh MarketGIS�YY�'cY1S�'Z
3) CONTAC.T PERSON ( name , address, phone #) John Rao III 655-9656
Hobie Richards 98�864 :
4 ) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Bartletts & Rt. 7
5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable)_ N/A
6 ) PROPOSED USE (S) Fresh specialty. food market
7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units,
maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)
ua;`�
_ .5 'sq. feet
8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 9
9) LOT COVERAGE: building(see si0 Tandscaped areas %
building, parking, outside storage %
10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 50,000 , Landscaping $1,500
Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $
See attached plan
11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: May 5, 1987
12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) See enclosed report
Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours:
Monday through Friday See enclosed report
11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m.
3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m.
13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Afternoons (peak 3 : 00-4: 00)
14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Saturday, Sunday, all day
DATE.OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
r'?
--
DATLI OF HEARING
0
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
May 6, 1987
Hobie Richards
Eastman's Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: Specialty Food Market, 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the minutes of April 28, 1987 at which the revised
circulation plan was approved. Please call me if you have any
questions.
JBL/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Dennis Pomerleau
Gordon Woods
David Spitz
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
4/28/87
JBL
MOTION OF APPROVAL
That the South Burlington Planning Commission revise the approval
(dated 3/31/87) of the site plan application of Hobie Richards,
John Rao and Antonio Pomerleau for conversion of the existing
building at 1525 Shelburne Road to a specialty fresh food market
as depicted on a plan entitled "Alterations to the Existing NBC
Building - Shelburne Road" prepared by Gordon G. Woods dated
January 1987, last revised 47-3-/-8.7 as follows:
1) Item #3 shall read:
The Shelburne Road access shall be closed. The privately
owned green space in front of the building shall be a minimum
width of 15 feet and the traffic circulation shall be in a one-
way in a counter -clockwise direction.
2) All stipulations from previous motion of approval dated
3/31/87 shall remain in effect.
M E M O R A N D U M
`1'O: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: Jane B . Laf
leur, City Planner
RE:
April 28, 1987 Agenda
DATE: April 24, 1987
2. Pizzagalli Realty Company, 55-65 Green Mountain Drive
The applicants propose to construct a 1500 square foot addition
to the western side of the existing 15,000 square foot 'Karhu
building. The addition will be for office use. The property is
zoned Commercial-2.
Access: Access is shown from the existing curbcut on Green Moun-
tain Drive.
Circulation: Circulation is shown on the west and north sides of
the building. The two driveways leading to the loading docks on
the northern side of the building will be widened to one driveway
to serve three loading docks.
Parking: Parking is adequate. The existing parking lot complies
with the ordinance and the addition requires 6 new spaces. The
plans show 12 new spaces.
Landscaping: The plans require $3000 in new landscaping. The
proposed landscaping includes three white pines and 20 dense yews
valued at approximately $1200. The applicant also proposes to
relocate four flowering crabs for which no credit is usually
given. A new plan should be submitted showing the required
landscaping prior to permit.
Coverage: Lot coverage does not exceed the maximum.
s
Other: An erosion control and drainage study is expected from
Wagner, Heindel and Noyes and should be available at the meeting.
See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
4. Richards, Rao, and Pomerleau_, '°1525 Shelburne Road
The applicants request to revise the stipulations of approval
regarding circulation in front of the building. The stipulation
in the approval motion required the front yard to be landscaped,
yip to the building. The applicants request. to include a 13
wide circulation drive along the front.
If the drive is approved, the front yard would be 49% l.andseaped.
If this area is landscaped, the front yard would be 66% Land-
scaped. The ordinance requires 70% of the front yard to be
landscaped.
1
(. Itt
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
April 24, 1987
Hobie Richards I
Eastman's Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards,
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission.
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 28, 1987 to
represent your request.
JBL/mcp
Encls
cc: Dennis Pomerleau
Gordon Woods
David Spitz
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
s
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
April 7, 1987
Hobie Richards
Eastmans Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: Retail use, 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards:
Enclosed are the minutes of March 31, 1987. Please call
me if you have any questions. You must meet the stipulations
within the approval motion in order to get your building
permit.
JBL/mcp
Encl
cc: Dennis Pomerleau
David Spitz
Gordon Woods
Sincerely,
1
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington vs -as
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
April 2, 1987
Ernie Christianson
AEC
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Pomerleau Building for Hobie Richards Fresh Food
Specialty Market, 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Christianson:
The City of South Burlington granted approval for the above
use. This is presently connected to City sewer and the
Bartlett Bay Sewage Treatment Plant. The average daily use
during operation of the previous use was 146 gallons per day.
This should be adequate for the new use as well.
JBL/mcp
cc: Hocie Richards
Denis Pomerleau
William J. Szymanski
Sincerely,
Jane B . Lafleur,
City Planner
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
April 1, 1987
Hobbie Richards
John Rao
Eastmans Meat Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards & Mr. Rao:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the minutes of the March 24, 1987 Planning
Commission meeting. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J��
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
1 Encl
CC: Antonio Pomerleau
PLANNING COMMISSION 31 MARCH 1987
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on
Tuesday, 31 March 1987, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room,
City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present
Peter Jacob, Chairman; William Burgess, Mary -Barbara Maher,
John Belter, Judith Hurd, John Dooley
Also Present
Jane Lafleur, Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Hobie
Richards, John Rao,' David Spitz, Jim Lamphere, Gary Lavigne,
William Gahagan, P. Anthony Blake, Eric Farrell, Gary
Farrell, Gordon G. Woods, Denny Blodgett, Kit Perkins
1. Minutes of 17 March 1987
Mrs. Maher moved the minutes of 10 March be approved as
written. Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
2. Continue site plan application of Hobie Richards, John
Rao, & Antonio Pomerleau for conversion of the existing
building to a wholesale/retail establishment at 1525
Shelburne Road
Mrs. Lafleur said the only issue remaining is traffic. The
estimated trips are 40-57, and the overlay zone would allow
51. The intersection is currently at "E" and will stay at
"E" until the road widening. Then it will go to "C". The
Commission will have to decide whether to find a way to
compensate for the number of trip ends over the allowable.
Craig Leiner strongly recommends closing the Shelburne Rd.
driveway.
Dennis Pomerleau said there may be gains by leaving the
access open. Right turns into the site could be made quicker
and safer than by turning at Bartlett Bay Rd. In addition,
the curb cut adds to the value of the site. He felt they had
a good circulation pattern on the lot, and the Zoning Board
was agreeable to closing the curb cut when the right turn
lane at Bartlett Bay Rd. is put in. Mr. Jacob stressed this
could be 10 years away. Mr. Spitz said the traffic figures
for the high end were based on the "super market" category,
and he didn't feel this is really a super market. Mrs. Maher
noted that a baker would generate lots of traffic, as would
some of the other uses. She also noted that they don't meet
the front yard criteria and the distance from the corner. Mr
Pomerleau said the building was built in 1960, and that's
what they have to work with.
A poll of the commission showed a majority in favor of
PLANNING COMMISSION
31 MARCH 1987
PAGE 2
closing the Shelburne Rd. curb
hard to get people accustomed
they could agree to close it i
happens with Shelburne Rd. A
they did not favor this.
cut. Mr. Pomerleau said it is
to a new venture. He asked if
n 1991, regardless of what
poll of the Commission showed
Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the
site plan application of Hobie Richards, John Rao, & Antonio
Pomerleau for conversion of the existing building to a
specialty fresh food market as depicted on a plan entitled
"Alterations to the txisting NBC Building -Shelburne Road"
prepared bv Gordon G. Woods dated January 1987, last revised
3/3/87 with the following stipulations:
1. A $1500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
This includes seven hawthorne trees, not shrubs.
2. Prior to permit, plans shall be submitted to Wagner,
Heindel & Noyse for an erosion control and runoff evaluation.
Their recommendations shall be reviewed 12y the City Engineer
and implemented in conjunction with this development.
3. The Shelburne Road Access shall be closed and the front of
the building shall be landscaped.
4. Revised plans ahll be approved 12y the City Planner prior
to permit.
5. A $1463 contribution toward the Shelburne Road inter-
section improvement
this development.
fee based on the 57 trip ends generated
This shall be paid prior to permit.
6. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or
this approval is null and void.
Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Consider
information
Rd. (access
request of Hoyt Gahagan to present additional
regarding the proposed carwash at 1810
on Harbor View Rd)
Shelburne
Mr. Dooley said the proper procedure is for the Commission to
decide if it will consider a request to hear additional in-
formation.
Mr. Lamphere said that the owner's option runs out tomorrow,
and they have asked some questions. They would be willing to
either widen the entrance to Harbor View Rd. (cost somewhere
between $10,00-15,000) or would contribute a like amount
toward a light at Allen Rd. It is their understanding that
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
March 27, 1987
Hobie Richards
Eastmans Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning
Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday,
March 31, 1987 to represent your application.
Sincerely,
"" 6 . 4-'--qj(�kLA_
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
Encls
cc: Dennis Pomerleau
David Spitz
Gordon Woods
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner
Re: March 31, 1987 agenda items
Date: March 27, 1987
2) RICHARDS, RAO AND POMERLEAU, 1525 SHELB
Enclosed are traffic studies from David Sp'
As noted last week, David concluded that
generate 40-57 trip ends. The overlay zone R11VWe
51 17a Cl 5 V,
i/oC), ODD 41� 144 (o 3.
ji uriLp enus.
The level of service at the Bartlett Bay/Green Mountain
Drive/Shelburne Road intersection is presently "E" and will
remain at "E" until Route 7 is widened. At that time, it will be
"C" with or without this use.
These levels also assume some signal timing adjustments. These
must be specified and then required of the applicant if this use
is approved. It would be important for the City to evaluate the
impact of any signal timing change on each leg of the
intersection.
Craig Leiner agrees with the level of service conclusion. He
believes it is another policy decision if we will allow a use
when the intersection is already below C. He also feels the
access should be solely from Bartlett Bay Road and not from Route
7 to better manage access and to improve the efficiency and
safety of Route 7.
In my view the Commission should apply the traffic overlay zone
standards first. If these are not met the Planning Commission
may chose to waive the overlay zone if there are site
improvements that produce a net benefit for traffic flow in the
vicinity. This includes a change or reduction in the number of
curb cuts as well as the level of service criteria (Section
17.50). Deleting the Route 7 driveway may be the only condition
under which this use should be approved.
3) GAHAGAN, 1810 SHELBURNE ROAD
Mr. Gahagan would like to present additional information
regarding the car wash that was denied by the Commission last
Tuesday evening.
4) WORK SESSION
Please see attachments and recommended amendments.
1
PLANNING COMMISSION
24 MARCH 1987
PAGE 6
The building in question is the easterly most structure, and
the addition will be the length of the building with only 862
sq. ft. of it used for the apartment. The remained will be
an empty shell. Mr. Valgoi said he and his wife want to live
on the property. They also have always wanted a peaked roof.
He said that under no circumstances would he use the empty
shell for anything.
Mrs. Lafleur noted that 2 additional parking spaces have been
cut out of green space. Mr. Valgoi said they do not need ad-
ditional parking spaces because he and his wife are there
every day now. Mrs. Peacock asked why they don't remodel 2
units and use them for an apartment. Mr. Valgoi siad this
would cost them too much in lost buisness. Mrs. Valgoi said
there would be less traffic than now because she now has to
go back and forth to their present home several times a day.
Mr. Burgess said the problem is the Valgois will not be the
owners of the motel indefinitely. Mr. Dooley asked if they
could approve only the apartment and not the empty shell.
Mr. Valgoi said he thought the A -roof would look beautiful
and still wants it.
A poll of members indicated they felt the lot too crowded
with inadequate circulation and traffic in excess of the
standard.
Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission deny the site
plan application of Erwin Valgoi for construction of a 1675
sc . ft. second story addition with an 862 sic ._ ft. apartment
and the balance left empty at the Swiss Host Motel, 1272
Williston Road and White Street, South Burlington, Vermont as
depicted on a plan entitled "Swiss Host Motel and Village"
prepared E Erwin G. Valgoi dated 3/13/87 for the following
rPacnnc*
1. Circulation within the development is inadequate and haz-
ardous for emergency vehicle access. Aisle widths are sub-
stnadard since they do not meet the 22 foot requirement. An
additional apartment will only aggravate this condition
adding more traffic and parking.
2. Traffic exceeds the traffic overlay zone which would allow
15 trip ends for this lot. Sixteen would be produced.
3. Lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed which is 70%.
Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
6. Site plan application of Robert Richards, John Rao, and
Antonio Pomerleau for conversaion of existing building to a
PLANNING COMMISSION
24 MARCH 1987
PAGE 7
wholesale -retail establishment for sale of meats and fish,
manufactured baked
Shelburne Rd.
goods and pasta and a deli at 1525
John Rao said they are basically proposing a fresh market
place comprised of individual entrepreneurs (bakery, produce,
specialty groceries, etc.). Mr. Richards said there would be
no partitions, no walls, but each concession would be in-
dividually owned. Mrs. Lafleur advised that the Zoning Board
had approved the multiple use but required a minimum of 4
"ONE WAY DO NOT ENTER" signs and an "ENTRANCE ONLY"sign on
Shelburne Rd. When Shelburne Rd. is widened and a right turn
lane is installed, the access will be closed. Mr. Szymanski
feels it should be closed now. Craig Leiner has not yet
submitted his recommendations. Mr. Rao stressed they are not
a supermarket and would not generate as much traffic as Grand
Union. Mr. Pomerleau said the goal is to get southbound
traffic already on Shelburne Rd. They project 40-57 trip
ends which is acceptable for that intersection. There is
also easy access to the traffic light.
Members felt they would like to hear Craig Leiner's opinion
before making their decision.
Mr. Dooley thus moved the Commission continue the hearing
until next Tuesday (31 March). Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion
passed unanimously.
Other Business
Mrs. Lafleur noted that residents of Ledge Knoll have ap-
pealed the Planning Commission decision on the quarry to the
Superior Court.
Members agreed to a work session of 31 March, a regular
meeting on 7 April and a work session and joint meeting with
the i! sty Lo�1c �l on 14 April.
Mrs. Lafleur introduced Kit Perkins who will be filling in
while she is on leave.
As there was no further business to come before the
Commission, the meeting adjourned at 10:10 pm.
Clerk
3/23/87
JBL
MOTION OF APPROVAL
That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of Hobie Richards, John Rao, and. Antonio
Pomerleau for conversion of the existing building to a specialty
fresh food market as depicted on a plan entitled "Alterations to
the existing NBC Building - Shelburne Road" prepared by Gordon G.
Woods dated January 1987, last revised 3/3/87 with the following
stipulations:
1. A $1500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
This includes seven hawthorne trees, not shrubs.
2. Prior to permit, plans shall be submitted to Wagner, Heindel
and Noyse for an erosion control and runoff evaluation. Their
recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and
implemented in conjunction with this development.
3. The aisle aroun the building shall be 18 feet wide and the
Shelburne Road dr"iv y .ha;ll be clearly marked with "one way -
do not enter" sig Ito prohibit exits on to Shelburne Road as
specified""by the Zoning Board.
M y
3. The Shelburne Road Access shall be closed and the front of
the building shall be landscaped.
4. Revised plans shall be approved by the City Planner prior to
permit.
5. A $1463 contribution toward the Shelburne Road intersection
improvement fee based on the 57 trip ends generated 'by this
development. - cr br
6. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this
papproval is null and void.
1
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
March 20, 1987
Hobie Richards
John Rao II
Eastmans Meat Market
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Re: Fresh Food Market, 1525 Shelburne Road
Dear Mr. Richards & Mr. Rao:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission
regarding your application. Please be sure someone is present on
Tuesday, March 24, 1987 to represent your request.
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
Encls
cc: Antonio Pomerleau
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: March 24, 1987 Agenda items
Date: March 20, 1987
3) R.P.M. DEVELOPMENT, GREGORY INDUSTRIAL PARK
1. Plan as shown is acceptable.
4) PRECOURT PROPERTY, 1160-1166 WILLISTON ROAD
1. Proposed building may be on a filled area which may cause
problems in the future. The owner should be aware of this.
2. Plan should show existing curb openings. It appears the
opening is being altered but plan does not so state.
3. Change in direction of drainage pipe must include a manhole.
4. The new drainage pipe must be of a size that is equivalent to
the three 18 inch that it has to handle, the 24 inch shown is
not.
5. Sanitary sewer is not located as shown.
5) SWISS HOST MOTEL, WILLISTON ROAD
1. Mr. Valogi does an excellent job in maintaining the site
however, parking is very substandard and lot coverage excessive.
2. Rebuilding a flat roof to a pitch roof is good but to do it
to the extent that additional units or office space can be added
to an already substandard site is questionable.
6) BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT, SHELBURNE ROAD
1. The entire project should be served by Holmes Road extension.,
2. Holmes Road extension should be 32 feet in paved width with
curbs and sidewalk.
3. The inside housing unit square shall have rounded corners not
square.
7) NBC BUILDING, SHELBURNE ROAD
1. The Shelburne Road curb cut should be closed and circulation
around building eliminated. This only encourages parking
adjacent to the building.
MEMORANDUM
SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 20, 1987
a) RICHARDS, RAO AND POMERLEAU, 1525 SHELBURNE, ROAD
The applicants propose to convert the existing 6578 square foot
building to a specialty fresh food market. The lot line is being
adjusted with the GE building lot so that both lots are
conforming size. The property is zoned C-2.
The Zoning Board will consider a multiple use permit on March 23,
1987. Assuming that is approved, the issues are as follows:
Access: Access is shown from the existing curb cut on Shelburne
Road. It is angled for entrances only. Assuming Shelburne Road
is eventually widened, the plans call for a median strip on
Shelburne Road in front of this property.
Another curb cut is shown on Bartlett Bay Road. This area is
presently open pavement. It will be curbed and landscaped.
Circulation: Circulation is shown completely around the building
so cars can park in the rear or on the northern side of the
building. (See Chief Goddette's comments.)
Parking: The 6578 square foot building requires 44 spaces if it
is all considered retail. The plans claim that a 476 square foot
office is included so that only 39 spaces are required. This
should be sufficient. The plans show the parking area expanded
at the rear of the building.
Landscaping: The renovations to the building require a "` in
new landscaping. The plans show increased gr-- r� ed
areas around the building. New landscan4- a-
thorne and 9 juniper and is val,,- '.ti �s
are planted, not shrubs.
Traffic: Enclosed is a traffic s ��Cv Q
Leiner's evaluation will be avails
concludes the following: 1 f#,V.�
The proposed use produces 40-57 t k `
allows 51 trip ends for this 45,000
of service at Bartlett Bay/Green M
intersection is presently "E" and w
use until Shelburne Road is widened.
"C" with or without this use. The
v i+ i this year.
Drainage: Plans must be submitted tol .uyse
prior to permit since this is in the y Watershed
area.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
5
dj OOQ 1-1) 09 ol 17 0a h S 4- 00-e I
rm
C�IA
cis IN 0�9
rll N\ ,<T— V,�.N
cll� VNA� W OCC 1,
py-v� Njo��
Chittenden County Regioniil Plyinning Commission
66 PEARL STREET
P.O. BOX 108
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
802 658-3004
March 23, 1987
Jane Lafleur, Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 051401
RE: Proposed Specialty Food Market
Dear Jane:
I have reviewed the traffic impact study for the proposed
specialty food market on US 7 at Bartletts Bay Road. The trip
generation estimate is quite reasonable, however I question the
appropriateness of subtracting 19 trips, as noted on the bottom
of page A-2 of the report. This is probably not a cause for
concern, since not all trips going to this market will be new
trips; that is, some are already on the road and will simply be
diverting to this site. Two issues which are critical are level
of service and access.
Currently, my analysis indicates the US7/Bartletts Bay/Green
Mt. Drive intersection is at Level of Service "E" in the PM peak,
with delay estimated at 56.2 seconds. If approved, the specialty
market will contribute a small amount of delay. Nonetheless, to
bring this intersection back to a Level of Service "D" would
require substantial costly construction. Consequently, I believe
this is yet another situation that will be a policy decision for
the planning commission.
20 Years of Service to the Municipalities of ...
Bolton Burlington Charlotte Colchester Essex Junction Essex Town
Hinesburg Huntington Jericho Milton Richmond
St. George Shelburne So. Burlington Underhill Westford Williston Winooski
Jane Lafleur -2- March 23, 1987
Second, there is an opportunity to access this site entirely
from Bartletts Bay Road. Accordingly, I believe the existing
access driveway on US 7 should be removed, and all access should
be via Bartletts Bay Road. This remedial action would be fully
consistent with current efforts to control access on Shelburne
Road.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CRAI . LEINER
TRAN PORTATION ENGINEER
Table 11. 1986 Capacity and Level of Service Parameters for Signalized Intersections
Cycle
EB
WB
NB
SB
Intersection
Period
Length
Delay
LOS
Xc
S(V/S)
LOS
Delajy
LOS
Delay
LOS
Delay
LOS
Delay__
1.
Prospect Parkway
AM
85
10.8
B
0.512
0.475
C
20.0
C
21.9
B
13.6
A
5.0
PM
85
7.7
B
0.507
0.471
C
20.1
C
23.2
B
7.3
B
5.7
2.
Flynn
AM
85
11.8
B
0.592
0.550
C
17.7
C
17.3
B
7.1
C
17.6
PM
85
16.7
C
0.773
0.719
C
20.7
D
35.8
B
5.3
C
22.5
3.
Home Avenue
AM
FLASHING YELLOW
PM
97
32.4
D
1 0.887
0.805
F
72.0
D
30.5
B
13.2
D
26.3
4.
Sears `,%all
AM
FLASHING YELLOW
PM
92
45.9
E
0.806
0.731
E
46.2
D
38.9
F
68.3
B
14.2
5.
Swift/1-89
AM
75
i
27.1
D
0.820
0.754
C
24.8
D
32.7
D
32.5
B
6.0
PM
90
60.6
F
1.048
0.978
D
27.6
F
140.8
F
72.2
B
13.2
6.
Queen City Park Road
AM
75
10.8
B
0.664
0.611
C
21.5
-
-
B
8.0
B
12.2
PM
90
10.1
B
0.762
0.711
D
35.5
-
-
B
6.1
B
7.7
7.
Lindenwood Drive
AM
75
4.7
A
10.573
0.527
-
-
C
20.3
B
5.9
A
3.8
PM
90
6.0
B
0.585
0.546
-
-
C
24.1
I B
7.8
A
4.4
8.
Brewer Parkway
AM
75
16.1
C
0.640
0.589
B
13.5
C
21.9
B
9.3
C
21.5
PM
90
22.7
C
0.881
0.823
C
22.5
D
30.9
D
28.4
C
15.1
9.
Baldwin Avenue
AM
75
8.6
B
0.600
0.552
C
21.3
C
24.6
13
11.6
A
4.6
PM
90
24.4
C
0.797
0.743
D
26.4
D
29.1
D
39.7
B
5.3
10.
Bartlett's Bay
AM
123
22 7
C
0.893
0.828
E
47.3
D
35.7
B
11.6
D
29.1
PM
129
56.2
E
1.085
1.009
D
34.6
F
97.5
B
8.0
F
77.6
w
0
NOIalI COUNTRY -
PIANNING
John Rao
100 West Canal Street
Winooski, Vermont 05404
Hobie Richards
EASTMAN'S MARKET
Route 7
Shelburne, Vermont 05482
Dear Mr. Rao and Mr. Richards,
15 Morse Drive
Essex Jct., Vermont 05452
(802) 878-0305
LeacL
-t I I`dmr
b--�-�-- � we
At your request, I have reviewed potential traffic impacts
from your proposed specialty -food market on Route 7 at the cor-
ner of Bartletts Bay Road. My comments include the following
(1) estimate of traffic volumes for the project, (2) review
of level of service at the Route 7/Bartletts Bay intersection
and any changes caused by the project, and (3) comments on the
appropriateness of a "right -turn enter" access on Route 7.
You have advised that the market will contain approximately
4410 square feet of retail space and 2090 square feet of whole-
sale space. For those areas, projected traffic volumes range
between 40 and 57 trip ends during the p.m. peak hour. Those
volumes are reasonably close to South Burlington's maximum of 51
for the property, and the use is compatible with the traffic
overlay district. Please also note that many users of the market
will already be traveling on Route 7 and will not create addi-
tional traffic.
The Route 7/Bartletts Bay intersection currently is oper-
ating at level of service E and can be improved to level C in 5
years if projected Route 7 improvements are carried out. Addi-
tional food market traffic will add 3.2 seconds of delay in the
current year and 0.7 seconds five years hence. Both increases
are relatively small. The higher initial decline is due to the
intersection's closeness to saturated conditions. For both time
periods, minor signal timing adjustments are necessary to opti-
mize levels of service.
page 2
A "right -turn enter" access point on Route 7 can be safely
implemented with proper design.. If approved, the entrance must
be angled with appropriate turning radii and driveway length.
Internal parking and circulation must be laid out so as to min-
imize conflicts at the entrance point. The one advantage of a
Route 7 access is that right -turn entering vehicles may actually
be able to exit Route 7 at a higher operating speed than at the
Bartletts Bay intersection, thereby minimizing conflicts with
through traffic.
In summary, the proposed use will generate moderate traffic
volumes but will create very minor impacts on Route 7 operations.
The availability of a traffic signal encourages easy access to/
from the proposed food market. At the same time, it must be rec-
ognized that the Bartletts Bay intersection currently operates
at a low level of service and improvements should be pursued.
I would be happy to provide any additional comments or in-
formation that may be requested.
Sincerely,
David H. Spitz
Nort11('Otintry Planning; • 15 ni()1sc I rix-c• ES1Scl,Jet., \T.
page A-1
I. Specialty Food Market - Trip Generation Estimates
Trip generations for retail uses are among the most difficult
to predict due to considerable variability from one type of retail
use to another. Examples of the range of retail traffic volumes
are given below.
Retail Category
Wholesale
Specialty Retail
Supermarket
Shopping Center
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends
Per 1.000 Square Feet
0.52
4.5
8.82 <
14.42
Based on descriptions provided by you, your retail and whole-
sale mix can be described as follows.
Use
Retail (Sq. Ft.)
"Tin-guini" Produce 1250
Meat/Fish Market 800
Vermont Pasta 160
Delicatessen 900
Bakery 500
Common Areas 800
4410
Wholesale (Sq. Ft.)
1250
200
640
2090 = 6500 sq. ft.
The most appropriate trip end category for your mix of uses
is "supermarket". A "low" trip end estimate calculates wholesale
space at the lower wholesale trip rate and retail space at the
supermarket rate. A "high" estimate calculates all space at the
supermarket rate.
North COtintry Illanning * IS NIOi;�c I)ri%,c • Esscx, let., NT.
page A-2
"Low" Estimate
2,090 S.F. Wholesale
4,410 S.F. Supermarket
A.M. Peak Hour Enter 3
Exit 1
Total 4
P.M. Peak Hour Enter 20
Exit 20
Total 40
Average Weekday 568
"High" Estimate
6,500 S.F. Supermarket
Based on the above, traffic volumes are calculated between 40
and 57 trip ends during the peak hour of travel. To provide a mar-
gin of safety, the higher estimate is used for the calculations in
the remainder of this report. Traffic splits are as follows: 65%
to/from Burlington,'30% to/from Shelburne and 5% to/from Bartletts
Bay Road.
II. Level of Service - Route 7/Bartletts Bay Road
The Route 7/Bartletts Bay Road intersection has been evaluated
at least twice recently : (1) by Thomas Adler for Lakeview Associ-
ates and (2) by North Country planning for the Harbor View Inn.
Turning movements in Figures 1 and 2 are taken directly from the
latter report, dated May 5, 1986. Incremental traffic volumes from
the specialty food market are underlined. Incremental trips equal
projected food market trips less an assumed 19 trip ends, based on
retail square footage, for the previous building occupant, Mill -
brook Bread.
3
1
4
29
28
57
816
No ilIl COun t.ry Ilanni11g • 15 N1O sc I )rix,c • Esscy.Ict., XT.
page A-3
FIGURE 1 : CURRENT P.M. DHV
ROUTE 7/BARTLETTS B%;Y' ROAD
Route 7
12
4+ 1127 33
I l
Bartletts �-_120
Bay 91 + 12 .
Road 2 �--- 46
29 + 6 --�
14 863 14
6
FIGURE" 2 : 1991/92 P.M. DHV
ROUTE 7/BARTLETTS BAY ROAD
Route 7
12
54 134 37
Bartletts 134
Bay 102 + 12
Road 2—) � 51
32 + 6�J
16
+ 0116
6
Green
Mountain
Drive
Green
Mountain
Drive
North (_0tlllt.] y Planning • 15 NImmsc I )rivc • I?,sscs.Ict., XT.
page A-4
Previous reports indicated that the intersection currently op-
erates in the mid to low D range but can be improved to level C af-
ter proposed upgrading of Route 7. An updated evaluation by North
Country Planning shows that the intersection h-is slipped into the
high E range but again can be improved to level C with Routs 7 up-
grading. The table below indicates current and projected levels of
service with and without the proposed specialty food market. All
worksheets are provided in the appendix.
Time Period
Level of Service
Average Deli 4
Current
DHV Without Development 1
E
40.9
Current
DHV with Development 2
E
44.1
1991/92
-.,HV without Development 1,3
C
17.7
1991/92
DHV With Development2,3
C
18.4
(1) Includes previous occupant, Millbrook Bread.
(2) With incremental trip ends from the specialty food market.
(3) Includes other developments, i.e. Lakewood and Harbor View Inn,
as well as projected Route 7 upgrading to 5 lanes.
(4) All calculated delays assume minor signal timing adjustments.
Delays would be even longer with existing signal timing.
Additional specialty food market traffic causes average delay
to decline by 3.2 seconds in the current design hour and by 0.7 sec-
onds in the 1991/92 design hour. The current design hour is more
sensitive to any additonal traffic because of its closeness to sat-
urated conditions.
North ("Ounfiry 1'1�uIII iIIgo 15Mot-ic. I )rix,c • I?�;�ct
page A-5
III. Right Turn Enter From Route 7°
A curb cut currently is available on the Route 7 frontage of
the parcel, and the specialty food market proposes to retain that
curb cut as a "right -turn enter". Generally, curb cuts on arterial
roads are encouraged to be closed whenever possible. However, an
argument can be made for retention of the "right -turn enter" here.
Projected traffic volumes entering as a right turn from the
North are fairly low - 19 in the p.m. peak hour. Those vehicles will
enter the parcel via a right turn either at a private curb cut or
at Bartletts Bay Road. It is possible to design a private access
that will actually allow right -turning vehicles to exit Route 7 at a
faster rate of speed than at the Bartletts Bay intersection.. This
arrangement may help reduce potential rear -end accidents on Route 7.
If a private curb cut is permitted several design items should
be required:
(1) The access should be sharply angled to discourage any
exiting movements.
(2) Turning radii and driveway length should be designed to
allow moderate exiting speeds.
(3) Parking and circulation conflicts should be minimized at
the entrance point. The Route 7 side of the building should be
clearly marked with "no parking"'signs. The apparent single park-
ing space at the northeast corner of the building and the one paral-
lel parking space closest to the Route 7 entrance should be deleted.
(4) All entering traffic should be directed to the left, i.e.
in front of the building. One-way traffic to the north of the build-
ing should be rerouted to provide continuous clockwise flow around
the parcel.
(5) It is assumed that all building access points will be on
the south and west sides and that no customer entrance will be
available on the Route 7 side of the building.
North Gnint:1y planning • 15 N1()sc I)rix,c• ES'Sea.let., XT.
APPENDIX
Level of Service Calculations
1) Current P.M. DHV - Without Development
2) Current P.M. DHV - With Development
3) 1991/92 P.M. DHV - Without Development
4) 1991/92 P.M. DHV - With Development
North Gnintry Hanningo 1.5Nl()i;tic I)riwe FsscxJcl.,VE
^
HCM(1985)
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
CAPACITY
ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Ba
tletts Bay Rd/Green
Mt Dr
AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD
.
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South
Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:Curr'ent
PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Without
Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz
TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
______________________________________________________________________________
*** INPUT INFORMATION
***
`
______________________________________________________________________________
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LEFT TURNING VOLUME
14
33
91
46
THROUGH VOLUME
863
1127
2
5
RIGHT TURNING VOLUME
14
48
29
120
PEDESTRIANS
50
50
50
50
ARRIVAL TYPE
3
3
3
3
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.90
0.98
0.90
0.90
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.03
NUMBER OF BUSES
0
0
0
0
GRADE
� 0.00
0.00
0.02
-.02
THROUGH LANE UTILIZATION
FACTOR 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
BASE SATURATION FLOW
1800
1800
1800
1800
NUMBER OF LANES
2
2
1
1
PARKING?
N
N
N
N
PARKING MANUEVERS PER HOUR
0
0
0
0
SIGNAL TYPE:
SEMI -ACTUATED
CYCLE LENGTH:
75
NORTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
1
0
LANE WIDTH
12
14
0
GREEN TIME
S.
46.0
0.0
SOUTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
1
0
LANE WIDTH
12
14
0
GREEN TIME _
S.
46.0
0.0
EASTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
12
0
0
GREEN TIME
12.0
0.0
0.0
� WESTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
15
0
0
GREEN TIME
12.0
0.0
0.0
^
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts Bay-Rd/Green Mt Dr AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:Current PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Without Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
--------------------------------------------------------------------����������
THE INTERSECTION AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY ISy.10.9
THE INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE IS: fM
------------------------------------------- ____...................................
STOPPED DELAY (SEC/VEH)
ADJUSTED LANE GROUP APPROACH
APPROACH LANE GROUP VOLUME V/C DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
1 15.56 0.09 22.96 C
NORTHBOUND 2 g74.44 0.89 16.22 C 16.33 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 33.67 0.19 23.27 C
SOUTHBOUND 2 1198.98 1.09 64.55 F 63.42 F
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 135.56 0.75 33.77 D
EASTBOUND
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.77 D
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
..... ..... _... .... ..... ..... .... ______________________________________________________________________
1 190.00 0.69 27.42 D
WESTBOUND 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.42 D
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
`
******************************************************************************
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED INTER8ECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts Bay Rd/Green Mt Or AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD '
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:Current PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:With Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
*** INPUT INFORMATION ***
-----------------------------------------�������
unowuon//^.n on'/ruon//^m w^oVon.=" ..=,m"=.^."
LEFT TURNING VOLUME
20
33
103
46
THROUGH VOLUME
863
1127
2
5
RIGHT TURNING VOLUME
14
60
35
120
PEDESTRIANS
50
50
50
50
ARRIVAL TYPE
3
3
3
3
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.90
0.98
0.90
0.90
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.03
NUMBER OF BUSES
0
0
0
0
GRADE
0.00
0.00
0.02
-.02
THROUGH LANE UTILIZATION FACTOR 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
BASE SATURATION FLOW
1800
1806
1800
1800
NUMBER OF LANES
2
2
1
1
PARKING'?
N
N
N
N
PARKING MANUEVERS PER HOUR
0
0
0
0
SIGNAL TYPE:
SEMI -ACTUATED
CYCLE LENGTH:
75
NORTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP
3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
1
0
LANE WIDTH
12
14
0
GREEN TIME
8.0
46.0
0.0
SOUTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP
3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
1
0
LANE WIDTH
12
14
0
GREEN TIME
8.0
46.0
0.0
EASTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP
3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
12
0
0
GREEN TIME
12.0
0.0
0.0
WESTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2
LANE GROUP
3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
15
0
0
GREEN TIME
12.0
0.0
0.0
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/bartletts Bay Rd/Green Mt Dr AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD .
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:Current PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:With Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
______________________________________________________________________________
THE INTERSECTION AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY IS .1
THE INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE IS: fE �
------------------------------------------ Lad r.....................................
STOPPED DELAY (SEC/VEH)
ADJUSTED LANE GROUP APPROACH
APPROACH LANE GROUP VOLUME V/C DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
1 22.22 0.12 23.07
NORTHBOUND 2 974.44 0.89 16.22 C 16.37 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 33.67 0.19 23.27 C
SOUTHBOUND 2 1211.22 1.10 69.79 F 68.53 F
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 155.56 0.86 45.71 E
EASTBOUND
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.71 E
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 190.00 0.69 27.66 D
WESTBOUND 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.66 D
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
^
HCM(1985)
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts
Bay Rd/Green
Mt Dr
AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD
INTERSECTION LOCATION:S6uth
Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:1991/92
PM
DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Without
Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz
TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
______________________________________________________________________________
*** INPUT INFORMATION
***
______________________________________________________________________________
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
LEFT TURNING VOLUME
16
37 102
51
THROUGH VOLUME
1021
1346 2
6
RIGHT TURNING VOLUME
16
54 32
134
PEDESTRIANS`
50
50 50
50
ARRIVAL TYPE
3
3 3
3
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.90
0.92 0.90
0.90
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
0.05
0.04 0.03
0.03
NUMBER OF BUSES
0
0 0
0
GRADE
0.00
0.00 0.02
-.02
THROUGH LANE UTILIZATION
FACTOR 1.05
1.05 1.00
1.00
BASE SATURATION FLOW
1800
1800 1800
1800
NUMBER OF LANES
3
:j 1
1
PARKING?
N
N N
N
PARKING MANUEVERS PER HOUR
0
0 0
0
SIGNAL TYPE:
SEMI -ACTUATED
CYCLE LENGTH:
75
NORTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP 2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
2
0
LANE WIDTH
12
11
0
GREEN TIME
10.0
39.0
0.0
SOUTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP 2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
2
0
LANE WIDTH
12
11
0
GREEN TIME
10.0
39.0
0.0
EASTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP 2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
12
0
0
GREEN TIME
17.0
0.0
0.0
WESTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP 2
LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
15
0
0
GREEN TIME
17.0
0.0
0.0
^
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts Bay Rd/Green Mt Dr AREA TYPE:
NON-CE0
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:1991/92 PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Without Development
3/13/87
TODAv'S DATE
ANALYST:D. Spitz :
______________________________________________________________________________
THE INTERSECTION AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY IS .7
THE INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE IS: '__________
__________________________________________________________________
STOPPED DELAY (SEC/VEH)
ADJUSTED LANE GROUP APPROACH
APPROACH LANE GROUP VOLUME V/C DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
1 17.78 0.08 21.64
-
NORTHBOUND 2 1209.83 0.72 11.55 B 11.70 B
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 40.22 0.18 21.98 C
SOUTHBOUND 2 1597.83 0.95 21.36 C 21.38 C
EASTBOUND
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
..... .... ..... ..... ..... ... ... .... .... ________________________________________________
1 151.11 0.60 22.61 C
2 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 22.61 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------------------- 0 ------------------------------------------------
1 212.22 0.57 21.16 C
WESTBOUND
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.16 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
. -
^
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
CAPACITY
ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts
Bay Rd/Green
Mt Dr
AREA TYPE:
NON -CUD
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South
Burlington
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:199V/92
PM
DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:With
Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz
TODAY'S
DATE:3/13/87
______________________________________________________________________________
*** INPUT INFORMATION
***
____________________________________________________________________
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND
EASTBOUND
__________
`
WESTBOUND
LEFT TURNING VOLUME
22
37
114
51
THROUGH VOLUME
1021
1346
2
6
RIGHT TURNING VOLUME
16
66
38
134
PEDESTRIANS
50
50
50
50
ARRIVAL TYPE
3
3
3
3
PEAK HOUR FACTOR
0.90
0.92
0.90
0.90
PERCENT HEAVY VEHICLES
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.03
NUMBER OF BUSES
0
0
0
0
6RADE
0.00
0.00
0.02
-.02
THROUGH LANE UTILIZATION FACTOR
1.05
1.05
1.00
1.00
BASE SATURATION FLOW
1800
1800
1800
1800
NUMBER OF LANES
3
3
1
1
PARKING?
N
N
N
N
PARKING MANUEVERS PER HOUR
0
0
0
0
SIGNAL TYPE:
SEMI -ACTUATED
CYCLE LENGTH:
75
NORTHBOUND: LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION 1
NUMBER OF LANES 1
LANE WIDTH 12
GREEN TIME 10.0
LANE GROUP 2
12
2
11
39.0
LANE GROUP 3
0
0
0
0.0
SOUTHBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2 LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
1
12
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
2
0
LANE WIDTH
12
11
0
GREEN TIME
10.0
39.0
0.0
EASTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2 LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
12
0
0
GREEN TIME
17.0
0.0
0.0
WESTBOUND:
LANE GROUP 1
LANE GROUP
2 LANE GROUP 3
LANE GROUP CONFIGURATION
7
0
0
NUMBER OF LANES
1
0
0
LANE WIDTH
15
0
0
GREEN TIME
17.V
0.0
0.0
`
^
HCM(1985) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:Route 7/Bartletts Bay Rd/Green Mt Dr AREA TYPE:
NON-CBD
INTERSECTION LOCATION:South Burlin'gton
DATE AND TIME PERIOD ANALYZED:1991/92 PM DHV
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:With Development
ANALYST:D. Spitz TODAY'S DATE:3/13/87
______________________________________________________________________________
THE INTERSECTION AVERAGE STOPPED DELAY I .4 _
THE INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE IS:
------------------------------- _____________________________________
STOPPED DELAY (SEC/VEH)
ADJUSTED LANE GROUP APPROACH
APPROACH LANE GROUP VOLUME V/C DELAY LOS DELAY LOS
1 24.44 0.11 21.73
NORTHBOUND 2 1209.83 0.72 11.55 B 11.76 B
3 ().00 0.00 0.00
____________________________________________________________________
1 40.22 0.18 21.98 C
SOUTHBOUND 2 1611.52 0.95 22.35 C 22.34 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
_.... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ... ______________________________________________________________________
1 171.11 0.68 25.16 D
EASTBOUND
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.16 D
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
______________________________________________________________________________
1 212.22 0.58 21.23 C
WESTBOUND 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.23 C
3 0.00 0.00 0.00
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
1.
2.
3.
4
—*uutb -43 urlingtvn Y irc Department
575 Burnet --'Z,,trect
�autlt IiJurlingtnn, llermant 05401
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
(802) 658.7960
MEMORANDUM
SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
CHIEF GODDETTE
TUESDAY MARCH 24,1986 AGENDA ITEMS
THURSDAY MARCH 19,1987
NBC BUILDING SHELBURNE ROAD
POMERLEAU REAL ESTATE
PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE ONLY PROBLEM
I SEE AT THIS TIME IS THE ROAD WAY AROUND THE BUILDING
MUST BE AT LEAST 18' WIDE FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT.
RPM DEVELOPMENT LOT 2-B
PLANS REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM
FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES.
SWISS HOST MOTEL
ADDITION FOR APARTMENT
PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND KNOWING THE PROPERTY AS
IT IS TODAY IN MY OPINION WE WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM
GETTING EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT IN INCASE OF A FIRE. WITH
A SECOND FLOOR I FEEL WE WOULD HAVE EVEN MORE PROBLEMS.
RINALD & BEATRICE PRECOURT PROPERTY WILLISTON ROAD
ADDITION
PLANS REVIEWED AND FOUND MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED
AS FAR AS THE LOCATION OF THE PERKINS BUILDING TO THE
ADDITION.
�'' N��\bcvc�
� � a �,
H
1\1N
Wagner, Helndel, and Noyes, Inc, consulting geologists
P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629
April 13, 1987
APR ? <)' 19P7
Ms. Jane Lafleur
Planning Office
Municipal Building
Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Jane:
We have reviewed the proposed site plan submitted by Hobbie
Richards and John Rayo for the NBC building located at the
northwest corner of Bartlett Bay Road and Route 7. Enclosed
please find our summary, recommendations, and conclusions for
this site. Please contact me with any questions.
Sincerely, ���� //jf
Jeffrey A. Nelson, Geologist
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
JAN/tac
enclosure
cc: Hobie Richards
H
1\1NWagner, Helndel, and Noyes, InC. consulting geologists
P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820
NBC BUILDING
BARTLETT/NORTH BROOK WATERSHED
Prepared by:
Qj� ,6-0�—
Jeffrey A. Nelson
Geologist
Date: April 13, 1987
H
Wagner, Helndel, and Noyes, .InC. consulting geologists
vv V " P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820
NBC Building
Bartlett/North Brook Watershed
Summary, Recommendations, and Conclusions
1.) The proposed site plan for the NBC building developed
by Gordon Woods, and dated 2/17/87, with subsequent
revisions has been reviewed to determine the hydrologic
impact on the North Brook watershed.
2.) In the pre -development condition, peak discharge from
1
the site is projected to be 3.78 cfs. The peak runoff
from the site for the conditions depicted on the
revised site plan, with no stormwater retention, result
in a peak discharge of 5.30 cfs.
3.) In order to reduce the peak discharge to
pre -development conditions as per the South Burlington
Planning Commission directive for the Bartlett/North
Brook watershed, a stormwater retention structure is
required.
4.) A proposed design consisting of a long narrow trench
along the western edge of the pavement behind the
existing building is included. This basin, with the
proposed outlet works consisting of a 1.0 ft. diameter
riser pipe provides the appropriate volume and
detention time to reduce the peak discharge from the
site to 3.44 cfs, just below the pre -development
level. Further, no increase to any downstream location
in the watershed will occur.
5.) Outflow from the riser pipe described above should be
routed through a culvert of 1.0' diameter, to be
connected with the existing storm drain line along
Bartlett Bay Rd.
6.) The existing catch basin near the southeast corner of
the lot should be removed. It is preferable to allow
stormwater to sheet across the paved area to the west
thus lengthening the amount of time prior to entry to
the North Brook.
H
�1IN
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont
' Po SKDFL'jIf-( Qp 1". k NT i C..,i 0,
Page No.
PAGE OF
PROJECT: gA2T -f N���
DATE: Lt , \ o' 16 �-
pvf2l.AND CwW 1 lr=Li0 � �-- �} �o� V�-
t G4 s
5ttkrT Low L=�`�oS �`lc V _�,a�i/S
103,l0� �
Sw A-t✓E, % L= Ltt� v = l- -(:V5 )t 3�,sF/
C- (e�{,Sr 1o3.L. (l-;L t 3�,5 51S,S '-,
p , 0 S4, ►A cZ_
H
W�N
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont
0
Page No.
PAGE OF
PROJECT ,6NnLL/ NBC, `3L 'c..
DATE: L { l o �6�—
00
Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc.
Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont
NO
Page No.
PAGE OF
PROJECT='LAV-10-11 f N.2-4. 6"'
DATE: il-lu• a�-
TYt *'FCR. Q EA- i X/T v `1
vc_nT 1uN; 1kke'D LAfi.L' j WP-ST "iF- Ec-U>&IL-
AV EMEJvT k',E4lIND Q;�vI(-j>LAJ -
LENL TLC11 1ZO I
C" S. ez. !f- p— L..T- w /%j
U uTfr Wv/ V 1 1'0' Yt iS V. (Z_ ''I
ScavTK E N IJ Q f- Q• AS %"
ftANI vt F w
R
�ZOI
T (f N r•N
C,0-j5 S. SEC--r lv hJ
k t, e iq ]L� Ti
N�. 4 ' i li L .
Sly£ SLuf£:r, % 3h tD IV
Uk A-luk(r Fi
• �
CA
� C"'i� a. � � try i ✓ `- �' �+ Fj.' "�"'--�-•�•'L"�"— -�• .. / `�`%'• s � �� .
71
yam. ;� � � - • - ` r�, � .
t� M r- i j t •.\ ya7 3
�f \ k` m
,o r,. ., F
M.
el
•��..J, T 1 �—:.#�S1y Q�.
i�,.
,t�t i f AA Ali
it ��` } - 6 1 • �„ . ��v _tit
0 ' r h� a• 1� • .•t -
53'�'Od6 STY I ` y.b 6� d
r' ? 1
•
�"fsrs, :r r � tilt y �� { �_+ � "4T'' •�.
Ty
-41
"3lMzvL. �,dF�a •Val+• k f - .. --- • . iV Y� �d r ..
i F�>t'�4 �. �. �i'7 � i r rr � i , a ' t � f r ` � • �, '9}
Afl
SSF_
�h% y d>� i., d , r S air t }, y STO
s Ilk
. Atr E
o � ,c CM/ATn t� )
�' Foci , , t. ntlh-1
_
ti