Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Decision - 1515 Shelburne RoadSO'"" i 13UII LINGTON GON ING BUAi: U ADJ US I',^.1' Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning; & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; j (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ( j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and - f T (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date �,�/ /�- T, /? 71- Appellant Vote: Yes 1-4 List findings below: 1, 2. 3: No Q Appeal #, SO "'Y HUHLINGTON GUN 1NG BOAJiD ' )A DJ U:� t';^_.�, 1 Findings in accordance with Section 1+468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (--j, (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 0- That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and ET - That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da to � (ZV /V'6 Appellant h A L L AA Vote: Yes No Q List findings below: Appeal # 3. Sign - -. ►��� to t , 7� ',-,. s ; c4n- 2. Aial-7�.'( ,ner`-Z- �ti ��� � GI Lr.,fi' � %`� nd� L� •ti � y%tC e/Ls•.�/ Sl`"")li BUH LiNGTON GON iNG BUAIi D 1 A1)J U�J I'u:�.:�'i Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; E] J (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1:7 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 0 Date Appellant Vote: Yes Q No Q List findings below: 1. 2. 3.. M Appeal # Lf Sign /" /-4 50' "")i HUHLINGTON GON ING 130A,r ) Findings in accordance with Section 1+460 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unn©cessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (f (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; LJ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential.' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently Impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent operty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. i Date ✓ �,�� Appellant `i �45l4 Vote: Yes No Q List findinzs below: 1. 2. 3 Appeal # Sign Sol"", BUR LING'l ON 'LUN iNG BUA,' D i YADJ UGI';^,:.:1' Findings in accordance with Section 1+46e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; no (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 9 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; �J (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1�4 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Nc Appeal # 5 Z8 % Da to A 9 A (� Appellant �-- Vote: Yes o E� Sign W List findings below: 1. 2. 3.