Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-75-0001 - Supplemental - 1515 Shelburne RoadNovember 4, 1975 Town & Country Furniture 1515 Shelburne Road South Furlington, Vr-? c,54ol Dear Mr. Lash: This letter is to advise you that the ;youth lurlington Zoning Board of .",djustment denied your request for a zoning variance on 11-fonday, November 3, 1975. The Board finds that your request does not conform with "ection 446E of the 1,ermont Planning and Development.act. Very truly, Richard !,�.ard Zoning .,dministrative Officer 1*1 ',,,7/j SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTYENT ^indings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'. character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign List-fiindings below: 2. 3. SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST;EENT ^findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; El (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and El' (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da te__ Appellant Vote: Yes Q 0-4 No List findings below: 1. 2. 3• Appeal Sign SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD Or ADJUSTINENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity-', narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b37 the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; EJ (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential, character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1J (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date i Appellant Vote: Yes Q No g List findings below: 2. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD 0? ADJUST', .ENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularitti, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b- the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential, character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be dk:trimental to the public welfare; and 11 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan,_: El j Date // /,? I Appellant Vote: Yes List findings below: 2. 3. Appeal # Sign < SOUTH BUP,LINGTON ZONING BOARD Or ADJUSTMENT ?findings in accordance with Section 446g of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b;� the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (�+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'. character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t-le public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: 2. 3.- Appeal # Sigr�—..