Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-75-0000 - Supplemental - 1515 Shelburne RoadJuly 22, 1975 -%Ir - Jat Lash -L .' i own and Countrr- Furniture shop 1515 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. ,ash ; Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning board of Adjustment has denied your request for a zoning variance. The Board finds criteria set forth in and Development Act. RW/h that your request does not meet the Section 4460 of the Vormont Planning Very truly yours, Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential! character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use -or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and i-',{ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # G �� Date Ar)pellant Vote: Yes No Q List findings below: �1 2. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA%D 0_? ADJUSTYKENT Findings in accordance with Section 446£? of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; _ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'. character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. ❑ Appeal Date 2�1 Appellant - Vote: Yes Q No i2 Sign L 1 ist findings below: 2. 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 'Findings in accordance with Section 41+68 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions,'and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; f1 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (7 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant Vote: Yes List findings below: 1. 2. No Appeal i Sig m SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; El (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and' 1:1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal ,# 17� Date 1 AT)pellant - Vote. Yes Q No Sign, List findings below: 1. 2.