HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-86-0000 - Supplemental - 1350 Shelburne RoadCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGrON
Subdivision Application - SKE'iCCH PLAN
1) Name, address, and phone number of:
a. Owner Of record Thomas
Farrell -
Farrell Distributing
Corporation
Holmes
Road - So.
Burlington, Vermont
05401
b. Applicant Thomas Farrell, Farrell Distributing Corporation
Holmes Road, South Burlington, Vermont 05401
and
William G. Gahagan
939 Ripley Lane, Oyster Bay, NY 11771
C. Contact person James A. Lamphere, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc
289 College Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401
2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including
number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s).
for 18 units of residential
�r�ccl �tT
3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc)
Farrell - Owner
Cpahagan - Option
4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties
see Site Plan
S) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements,
covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.
street right-of-way -- see sitelan
r
6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities
such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.
Extend public water and sewage and storm drainage
Add public street
7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or
by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed sub-
division, and include the dates of such actions:
NONE
8) Submit four copies of a sketch plan showing the following information:
1) Name of owners of, record of contiguous properties.
2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belonging to owner of
record and (b) proposed subdivision.
3) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of
existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and cove-
nants. .
4) Type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, '
utilities, and open space.
I
5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic).
6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property
and surrounding area.
(Signature) arl
ram"
icant'or contact person
date
Mr.. Far—r(.I,
I,r1,,)))�.,!:-. 11 111.1.,1,,)
:, .I.53 ;,(.r(. 11;!
norih 111•
t.h(,
I;10, I1(':I I t.* ()J F I(•1'
IiII I11 I ttv, 1 (`ittit
1)1 11,. 1I�tli i
RI)itll
ex tens i oII I.
'Thc! I o1. i s : 011i' l
Ik, I 1 1 . 53 tacI.os ) itntI
ii mil,: i
till is are
pernti t.ted. T I I e
r,I.-Ins show Ili nett
Irni t.s 1: i I It
fit,
garages .
The Ord i mince a I
I <,ws a range of 1
1 to 18 on
i t.s .
(4.53 arres-
III inIis we.t", aI- as
(.28 here" _ 4 2'5
fit iIiIis 15%
fc)I•
streets =
6 1 = 3. 64 x 1 = 1 •1
tin i Ls: .
Access :
TI-I prol)t!rtw t 1
1)c served I-)y IIoIfit t!s
11'.orlcf cxLeII
o I I
along the
southern boundary.
This is shown on
the I)Ians as
a 66
foot r . o .
w . It should be an
80 foot r . o . w . as
located 1)v
E3i11
Szymanski.
Access is shown
from two dr.i.veways
from Hot mes
Road
extension.
I agree t, i t.h
13i 1.1. that one On
t ra ric e would
he
suffici"ent and that it shc)uId be opposite Green Mount.iaiit Drive.
Circulation: A
loop road of 241
feet,
in width circulates through
the development.
from 11o.1mes
[toad
ex tens i c)n . Thc! Comm i ss i on
should discuss
whether or not
this
street is to be is City Street
that. meets City
standards ( i .e.
60
foot r.o.w. with :10 feet c)f
pavement and curbs
Parking: 'These 18 u n i t.s regIii r(:39 parking splices0 are. shown
No garages are shown.
Landsr.aping : A complete landscaping plan is required at.
preliminar.v r)lat. The r)arkirig spaces should he well screened so
that. head.li0ats do not_ interfere with the adjoining si.n,le -fanti I
homes.
Other-: A complete traffic- stud- is needed prior to 1)relifit inar'-
plat that till be reviewed b�� Cr•ai.g Leiner. An 1800 g.1).d. se%,er•
allocation is required. The applicant must. [)ay th( $2.50 1)t,r.
gallon fee prior to pernri t..
81 t FAIMELI. 1_340_ l_.2 Sit E'LBURNE? ROAD
Mr. Farre.l .l. proposes I,o construct a drive -through car t,: tsh on tho
2.2 acres w(!st, of the project. reviewed above. This is the same
site as the Rocky's Car Wv1.01 that was approved artd IIas sin(•e
expi rc�d . 'I'll i s plan i rtc I ud;'s ,I ret,ra i 1 rhea iIrld g!ls I)on11)s .
Acc,i?ss : Actress wi 1 I ho 1'roul two curl) co Ls Ml It() I rates fro:I,i
(,!,tens i o I I . The nc!ed for t.wo dr• i ves should L)e d i scuss(,li
especi.allsine there is a fro iItti9e road. Al I cifr1.) cuts on Routh
7 must he close(J. 'Phis project, must be redesigned to reflect the
pror)osed 8O foot wide ilol mes Road extensi on .
Ci.rculat.ion: Circulation i.s complete around and thrOo,h the (lit!
wash .
Landsc;i_j)i l9: The plans require 51O,500 in nelc Iitn(lscapi119
$6 , 600 is shown. The a1)1) 1 i (JiIII t: i s I-Q(IU(!s t, i rtg ( red i•t. fu I - 0x i s t i n
0
easement g i ve•n .
1 . Underaround power shn L I he pInct"I back or the , ide•e a I k t I of
side) with telephone and T . \ . The gas main sha I 1 he in the v rass
strip heLween curb and :=.ieigwnik.
5. Al l r.tti.l i t v IrI ans sha l l he s"I m i t.t ed to the t: i hy r"r appr"va I
prior to installation or at the eery InLest prior to issuing; Any7
building permits, This also includes st.reret. light-ing.
6. Water Department, shall review and approve water system plans.
7. Road typical section on pager 13, delete note 117 reVorence to
decreasing the 18 inches or grave• base.
H. Prec_ast, concrete inlets and catch basins can be manur,.actured
to exact dimension therefore Were is no need ror up t.o S courses
of bricks. Road 'salt deteriorates bricks and mort-ar. The maximum
course of bricks should be two courses.
7) FARILELL i PROPERTY, CONDO:`1INIUM DEVELOPMENT, HOLMES
ROAD EXTENDED EASTERLY
1. Proposed Holmes Road extension is plotted on sketch plan
dated September 23, 1986. The project should be planned around
this location. I would recommend there he one road opening; to
the site. This opening should be opposite the planned Green
Mountain Drive intersection.
2. Site shall include storm water runoff control.
8) CAI? WASH, SHELBURNE ROAD
1. Proposed Holmes Read extension is not located as shown. it
is partly located on the property to the south. That properLy is
also in for site plan review. Both must work t.oge.ther to lount.e
it cohere planned.
2. A single access drive should he considered. This would U i ve
exiting cars a ,greater Length of travel beVore entering .a Muhl is
street allowing more t.Lme to drip and ;avoiding iceing on the
street which is a problem Lire Ci t y has c. i th, other war rashes. It
also gets the d r• i ve away rr om ;.a i n t-"rsoo t, i on t.h;a 1 will he hush• in
the future.
9) CITY
HALL
ADDITION ( WATER DE PAR'1'M!{N'I'1
UOItSI.'I'
1. I
have
worked wi t.h the Water Board
:and arch i teat on this
project
and I
approve this layout..
L
.,
�vttt.��+� urlittgtan �R ire � epttrtnr��ftt �;
575 i9urut street t
3utttb Nurliuutuu, `�lermuut 05401
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
(802) 658-7960
MEMORANDUM
----------------
TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE
RE: OCTOBER 28,1986 AGENDA ITEMS
DATE: OCTOBER 21,1986
#I. CITY COMPLEX ADDITION FOR WATER DEPT.
Plan reviewed by this department and the following
was found to be a problem in trying to give proper
protection;
A. Hydrant location.
B. Access Around the building.
C. Parking and access to the front of the
building.
With this plan or design there is no way proper
protection can be given.
-
C— -- -- _
#2. Tho�mas Farrell Property yShelburne Road Condos
----
During the review the following was found which
needed changes
A. Buildings brought closer to the road so
the distance was no more then 60' from
the center of the roof and 10 foot from the
back of the parking space.
B. No less the 3 hydrants.
I did meet with a member from Mr. Lamphere's office
on the problems but the corrections were not made.
#3. Proposed Car Wash- Farrelks Property.
Only problem found at this time is one hydrant is
required by one of the drive ways to the property
off the new road.
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658-7955
October 24, 1986
James Lamphere
Wiemann-Lamphere Architects
289 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Farrell - 18 unit PUD and Car Wash, Shelburne Road
Dear Jim:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658.7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning
Commission regarding these two applications. Also enclosed are
Bill Sz,ymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on
Tuesday, October a8, 1986 to represent your request.
Sincerely,
(C
Jane B. L:afleur,
City Planner•
JBI,/mcp
Encls
cc: Farrell Distributing Corporation
William G. Gahagan
,05AR' fool
ioo"
47
Z .1 A f-
t ... _
` 1
s At.
r.
�
— --
171 ...
Ik
roJ` µryJasl } 2,3 /A
1
I