HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-86-0000 - Supplemental - 1340 1342 Shelburne Roadc raw o .
10/27/86
JBL
MOTION OF APPROVAL
That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of Thomas Farrell and William Gahagan for
construction of a 13,500 square foot Car Wash and retail facility
at 1340-42 Shelburne Road as depicted on a plan entitled "Site
Plan - Proposed Car Wash - Shelburne Road, South Burlington,
Vermont" prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, dated 9/25/86
with the following stipulations:
1) A $10,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
The plans shall be revised to reflect this amount and shall
include larger 3 inch to 4 inch caliper trees.
2) Access shall be from one curb out on Holmes Road extension.
The plans shall be revised to show this.
3) The plan shall be revised to show the 80 foot r.o.w. for
Holmes Road extension.
4) The signal at Holmes Road and Shelburne Road shall be
installed and operating prior to permit.
5) The applicant shall contribute $,__,= toward the Shelburne
Road intersection improvement fund based on the 171 trip ends
generated by this development.
6) Legal documents for the dedication of Holmes Road extension
shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to
permit.
7) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
\MV-F-lD�
October 27, 1986
Mrs. Jane LaFleur, Planner
Municipal Offices
City of South Burlington
Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Farrell Development
Shelburne Road - So. Burlington
Dear Jane:
In reference to the sketch plan of 1350 Shelburne Road and the
site plan approval for the car wash at 1340-45 Shelburne Road,
we would like to request that you withdraw these applications
from the Planning Commission agenda of October 28th.
Regarding this withdrawal, please note that we've had a number
of requests for changes from our client and it's obvious from
your memo that you expect us to build a public street as an
extension of Holmes Avenue. At this point, the questions from
the developers of the people wishing to build the car wash are
such that we feel uncomfortable in going before the Planning
Commission until final decisions have been made.
Thank you for your assistance. We'll contact you in the near
future regarding the progress of this project.
nce ely,
es A. here
JAL/cad
WIEMANN-LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS • 289 COLLEGE ST. • BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • 802-864-0950
D:)te Ri-ccived - - — By --' -- —
Date Application Ccenleted and Received
0
CITY OF SOUTH BURL I NG7'ON
APPLICATION FUR SITE PLAN Rr"VI ELq
1) AJ+ME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE 'NUMBER OF:
(a) Owner of Record Thomas Farrell - Farrell Distributing Corporation
Holmes Road - So. Burlington, Vermont 05401
(b) Applicant Thomas Farrell - Farrell Distributing Corp.
and
William G. Gahagan 939 Ripley Lane, Oyster Bay, NY 11771
1 (c) Contact Person James A. Lamphere
Wiemanq-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 289 College St., Burlington, VT 05401
2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Shelburne Road, South Burlington
i
3) PROPOSED USES): Car Wash retail
c c 6c f -r-- Cd Gtt 13 41 Ow Sl /4i1 C /t,L ,l t k-e-p
4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e.,'# of units, floor area, etc.)
13,500 sf - one storey
5) AUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) 15 full time, 30 part time
6) COST ESTIMATES:
(a)
Buildings 400, 000. 00
(b)
Landscaping 6,000.00
(c)
All Other Site Improvements
(i.e.,
curb work) Site development $40,000.00
7) ESTIMATED PROJECT Ca1PLETION DATE
8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) _ 140 cars in per da
9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION
10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION
i2:00 - 2:00 PM
Saturday and Sunda
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PPLlcANr
T0:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
#2
t.ttlitl ���� UI ltill�Yt111 �h iCC 9I l'�tilt'ttllftlt
57_1 Ell Uriict *1rCCt
�nutll �.3urlirigtou, Vermont 05,111t
Of f 1C.F uE
JAMES W GOMM:TIt, SH
CHIEF
(802) 658 7960
MEMORANDUM
----------------
SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
CHIEF GODDETTE
OCTOBER 28,1986 AGENDA ITEMS
OCTOBER 21,1986
CITY COMPLEX ADDITION FOR WATER DEPT.
Plan reviewed by this department and the following
was found to be a problem in trying to give proper
protection;
A.
Hydrant location.
B.
Access Around the
building.
C.
Parking and access
to the front
of the
building.
With this
plan or design
there is no
way proper
protection
can be given.
T omas
Farrell Property
Shelburne
Road Condos
uring
the review the following
was
found which
needed
changes
A. Buildings brought closer to the road so
the distance was no more then 60' from
the center of the roof and 10 foot from the
back of the parking space.
B. No less the 3 hydrants.
I did meet with a member from Mr. Lamphere's office
on the problems but the corrections were not made.
#3. Propose( Car Was}1-jF�arreI l's Property.
Only problem found at this time is one hydrant i:=
required by one of the drive ways to the property
off: the new road.
CAC WP►s}k, i34t)- ua Sl)66ume 3.S
MEMO
FROM: Mark Landon
DATE: October 22, 1986
RE: Car Wash
Farrell/Gahagan
South Burlington, Vt.
1. During the Planning Commission Meeting of August 6, 1986, on page 2, Roger Dickinson
presented his firm's traffic study of Rocky's Car Wash done the previous week. They
found that the peak traffic was Saturday and Sunday mornings, averaging 15 vehicles
per hour, the equivalent of 30 trip ends. During the weekdays, the noon hour and the
P.M. peak hour experienced 10 cars per hour, or 20 trip ends. We noted that winter
months see higher use than summer months. In estimating traffic at the Shelburne
Road location, Dickinson felt that there would be 41 trip ends per hour on weekdays
and 61 trip ends per hour on weekend mornings. We added that on Shelburne Road,
traffic is higher in summer that in winter months.
Therefore:
a. Weekdays 41 trip ends/peak hour
b. weekends 61 trip ends/peak hour
2. Based on ITE's 46 trip ends per 1000/s.f. of convenience store, the 2400/s.f.
convenience store would add:
2400 s.f./1000 s.f. x 46 = 110 trip ends/peak hour
3. The car wash and convenience store would generate a total of,trip ends/peak
hour.
4. The condcminimums will generate (apartments) .7 trip ends/peak hour/unit.
.7 x 18 = 13 trip ends.
5. Therefore, the total trip ends per whole site is estimated at 184 trip ends/peak
hour.
6. The allowable trip ends for site as a Zone 3.
25 x (2.77 acres + 4.53 acres/40,000) x 43,560 = 198.7 or 198.7 trip ends/
peak hour.
End Memo......
cc: J. Lamphere
File
7 ) 'I_. F_',P,REA:Ls 1 350 SIIE.LBURNE_ ROAD
Mr. Farrell proposes to develop a 4.53 acre lot north of the
proposed B1)P Realty 0ff.'ice Building, east of Holmes Road
extension. The lot is zoned R4 (4.53 acres) and a maximum of 18
units are permitted. The plans show 18 new units wi.t,h no
garages. The ordinance allows a range of 14 to 18 units.
(4.53 acres minis wet areas (.28 acres) = 4.25 minus 15% for
streets = .61 = 3.64 x 4 = 14 units).
Access: The property will be served by Holmes Road extension
along the southern boundary. This is shown on the plans as a 66
foot r.o.w. It should be an 80 foot r.o.w. as located by Bill
Szymanski. Access is shown from two driveways from Holmes Road
extension. I agree with Bill that one entrance would be
sufficient and that; it should be opposite Green Mountain Drive.
Circulation: A loop road of 24 feet in width circulates through
the development from Holmes Road extension. The Commission
should discuss whether or not this street is to be a City Street
that meets City standards (i.e. 60 foot r.o.w. with 30 feet of
pavement and curbs.)
Parking: These 18 units require 39 parking spaces; 50 are shown.
No garages are shown.
Landscaping_ A complete landscaping plan is required at
preliminary plat. The parking spaces should be well screened so
that. headlights do not interfere with the adjoining single-family
homes.
Other: A complete traffic study is needed prior to preliminary
plat that will be reviewed by Craig Leiner. An 1800 g.p.d. sewer
allocation is required. The applicant must pay the $2.50 per
gallon fee prior to permit.
8 l'. FAEtRELL 1340-42 SHELBURNE ROAD HRWasl�
Mr. Farrell proposes to construct a drive -through car wash on the
2.2 acres west of the project reviewed above. This is the same
site as the Rock,y's Car Wash that was approved and has since
expired. This plan includes a retail. area and gas pumps.
U�Access: Access will be from two curb cuts on Holmes road
extension. The need for two drives should be discussed
especially since there is a frontage road. All curb cuts on Route
7 must be closed. This project must be redesigned to reflectthe
proposed 80 foot wide Holmes Road extension.
Circulation: Circulation is complete around and through the car
wash.
Landscaping: The plans require $10,500 in new landscaping;
$6,600 is shown. The applicant is requesting credit for existing
3
trees. This information will be available at the meeting. I am
riot satisfied with the 200 seedlings that are part, of the land-
scaping plan since they do not: appear to contribute a significant
amount to the landscaping. I recommend larger trees in the wet,
areas as well as on the rest, of the property.
Other: The tr.aff:ic overlay zone permits 72 trip ends if we
assume Holmes Road is signalized due to the Lakewood project.
Data supplied by the applicant shows that the car wash and.
convenience store will generate 171 trip ends/peak hour. (See
letter) See Bill. Sz,ymanski_'s comments.
9) SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT, 575 DORSET STREET
The South Burlington Water Department proposes to construct a
3600 square foot addition (1800 square feet on two floors) to the
back of City Hall. The 5.7 acre lot is zoned Municipal.
Access: Main access is shown from the existing curb cut on
Dorset Street. The southern curb cut will be closed to conform
with the Dorset Street widening plans and to improve access. The
Fire Department driveway and the northern parking lot driveway
will remain. A new access is shown to 595 Dorset Street to
conform with the Dorset Street widening since their access will
combine with City Hall after the widening.
Circulation: The Circulation around the rear of the property
will be closed. The new addition will be reached from the
northern parking lot.
Parking: The 23,600 square foot office building and addition
requires 94 parking spaces; 111 are shown.
Landscaping, A $5900 landscaping plan is required. New parking
lot landscaping includes 10 sugar maple and 5 Austrian pine
valued at approximately $2200. The street trees on Dorset Street
are presumably part of the widening project rather than this
application. Perhaps a contribution towards the City's share
should be made.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. A
water and sewer easement, cuts through this property; construction
is outside the easement.. , There is a 50 foot Conservation 'Lone
along the Interstate ramp right-of-wa,y. This setback is
maintained.
4
Y
easement. given.
4. Underground power shall be placed back of the sidewalk (lot
side) with telephone and T.V. The gas main shall be in the grass
strip between curb and sidewalk.
5. All utility plans shall be submitted to the City for approval.
prior to installation or at the very latest prior to issuing any
building permits. This also includes street lighting.
6. Water Department shall review and approve water system plans.
7. Road typical section on page 13, delete note 117 reference to
decreasing the 18 inches of gravel base.
8. Precast concrete inlets and catch basins can be manufactured
to exact dimension therefore there is no need for up to 5 courses
of bricks. Road salt deteriorates bricks and mortar. The maximum
course of bricks should be two courses.
7) FARRELL PROPERTY, CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, HOLMES
ROAD EXTENDED EASTERLY
1. Proposed Holmes Road extension is plotted on sketch plan
dated September 23, 1986. The project should be planned around
this location. I would recommend there be one road opening to
the site. This opening should be opposite the planned Green
Mountain Drive intersection.
2. Site shall include storm water runoff control.
CAR WASIi, SIiELBURNE ROA
1. Proposed Holmes Road extension is not located as shown. It
is partly located on the property to the south. That property is
also in for site plan review. Both must work together to locate
it where planned.
2. A single access drive should be considered. This would give
exiting cars a greater length of travel before entering a public
street allowing more time to drip and avoiding icei.ng on the
street which is a problem the City has with other car washes. It
also gets the drive away from a intersection that, will be busy in
the future.
9) CITY HALL ADDITION (WATER DEPARTMENT) DORSET
1. I have worked with the Water Board and architect on this
project and I approve this layout.
E
WIEMANN LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS
289 COLLEGE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PHONE (802) 864-0950
To: A Aa4e_ Date ® ProjectNo.
Projects" '4—j --
Gentlemen
We are sending you the following items
No
C.�
Items transmitted as follows:
1-1 Approved
❑ Approved as noted
Not approved
Resubmit for approval
Furnish corrected copies
❑ For your files
1-1
Description
rewith 1-1 under separate cover
M
Items nt by:
Our messenger
Your messenger
Remarks
class mail
WIEMANN—LAMPHERE
2M QCP 985
MEMO
FROM Mark Landon
DATE: October 22, 1986
RE: Proposed Car Wash
List of Existing Trees to be Saved
Southwest Corner:
4 Maples: 12"; 12" - 12" dia.; 12" dia; 18 - 16" dia.; height
approximately 301.
On Shelburne Road/West Side:
Lilac: 18' high - 15' dia. spread.
Cedar: 10" dia. - 25' high.
Northwest Corner:
5 Maples: 8" to 12" dia. - 20' to 25' high.
6 Spruce: 12" dia. - 40 to 45' high (10 existing).
2 Maples: 12" dia. - 30' high.
North Side:
Cedar Hedge: 15' to 20' high, medium density.
Gray Birch: 16" to 18" dia. - 40' high.
End Memo......
cc: J. Lamphere
File
No Text