Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-86-0000 - Decision - 0040 IDX DriveJA 1 1 TL.Clt PLANNING COMMISSION 28 OC TOBER 1986 page 2 1. A surveyed plan with the boundary adjustments for the 50-foot strip along the northern property line shall e recorded rior to permit. The 0- oot strip shall e shown as part and parcel o iot at 1515 Shelburne Rd. and not as a separate lot. The surve ei plan shall show the - oot water main easement. 2. A $3,000 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 3. One fire h sT)ecified bv location k.aac i caai vi Uitc O.L Ut:. A uur1U 5naii Ue osLeQ --or tn1S prior to permit. 4. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 4. Continue site plan a placation of�BDP alty for IDS, Inc., for construction of a 1 sq, ft. obuilding on 10.98 acres at14 0 Rd. Mr. Ptaszynski enumerated the changes in the plan: they have ad- dressed the Holmes Rd. Extension. When it goes in, they will tie both parking lots into it so that they will be coming onto Shelburne Rd. at a traffic light. Mrs. Lafleur said the time limit for doing this can be stipulated. It appears that the sidewalk is part of the Shelburne Rd. construction plan. Mrs. Lafleur said the Com- mission could ask for a contribution from this developer and put it in escrow to be used either here or at another Shelburne Rd. location. Space will be reserved for additional parking, but the developer will not be required to pave it until needed. Mr. Ptaszynski said this is a phased project, and they will be building only half of it now and the second portion in about 3 years. They will probably rent one floor now. Mr. Burgess said the Commission still has to deal with this as regular office space since they don't know who the tenant will be and what their parking requirements will be. After a long discussion, a poll of members indicated that a majority agreed that after Phase II, the project will be reviewed to see if additional parking is needed. Mrs. Hurd said the plan should be revised to show the temporary driveway to be used before Holmes Rd. Extension is built. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission a2prove the site plan app ica ion of B.D.P. Realty or construction of a sq. office buildiri on the 10.98 acre lo�7+UU el u�rne Rd as�e- picted on a p an entitled "Site an - Interpretive Data S s ems" Zrepared by TrudelI Consultin En ineersdated with the ollowing striu a ions: PLANNING COMMISSION 28 OCTOBER 1986 page 3 1. Legal documents for the dedication of land for Holmes Road ex- tension shall e� submi e o the City Attorney of r app'f ov91 wiTn n 30 days or � pri r to �-permi , ,>w 1c ever is first. 2. The Commission grants approval for 407 parking spaces and 73 designated for Zuture parking 12 needed. The Uommission may re- quite that the area shown ror parking expansion be eveioped as parking spaces if on review after Phase 11 is compieteed,, it de= ermines that such additional parking is necessary. 3. A $37,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. 4. A sidewalk shall be constructed along the Shelburne Road front- age in a location that conforms to the widened Route (. All sic1e- wal s shall be concrete and continuous across driveways. A bond— shalle posted in an amount determinedy the City Engineer or money sail s e lace%. in escrow or use in a differen�ne2Gurne Rd. location ifFhis is covered by the a e s widening p an. 5. A $6 983 fee for the Shelburne Road intersection improvements T-un-ff-shail be paid prior to permit basedon the rip ends generated —may this development. 6. A complete erosion control No se shall be submitted to t A:�o retain ecant s a runoff conditions. study prepared by Wagner, Heindel & e Citv Engineer for aDDrovai prior 11 implement the re on -site to maintain 7. The existin fire hydrants shall be relocated and a third hy- drantshall bein�lld behind the new building in o ations aDDroved bv the Fire Chief. 8. The abandoned service road and drivewa area top soiied and seeded. ur ing s a a h� andoned Shelburne Road access. shall be removed and the e instalied at UTe_ 9. The Planning Commission grants approval of 45 feet in height. The e Commission has determined thate tailer structure: a. utilizes opograp y and re a es to other existing and pro- pose structures so as to be aestneticaiiy compatible with he bneigh or o0 does nod detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and wa a s; an c. allows retention or additional green space that enhances the appearance of the deveioped property. 10. A sewer allocation of 3825 gallons per day is granted in ac- cordance with e Soi Buriin ton Sewer_ Policy. The 52.5U per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 11. Parking may be annroval of t P r; >ed for the two phase construction plan upon anner. PLANNING COMMISSION 9,8 OCTOBER 1986 page 4 12. The Plannin& Commission authorizes the creation of a temporary road to the north ofposed office building for use rio-r to e existence of Holmes Road Extension to reach the parking spaces in the rear of the building. The location shall e shwon on the plan and approved by the City Planner prior to permit. 13. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Ms. Peacock seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 5. Consider sketch plan a lication of BI Industries for a 2- lot su division of the 4.26 acre_parcei at 80 Allen Roa Mr. Cannizzaro indicated the property is east of Burlington Dru Co, about 600-'700 feet from Shelburne Rd. It is a manufacturing office building for the production of industrial machinery. DBI feels they own more land than they need and want to sell off the adjacent land. Mrs. Lafleur noted that neither lot is on the sewer system, and if the buyer of the new lot wants to be on the sewer, they would have to extend it. There are 2 graveled entrances to the lot; these are not curbed. Mr. Dooley was concerned about the sewer and felt subdivision should require extionsion of the sewer. Mr. Burgess said that requiring sewer extension to the vacant lot forces existing buildings to hook up. Mrs. Lafleur said it was her understanding that the Commission can require any development to connect to the sewer if there is capacity available. Mr. Burgess said he wasn't sure this was the case. Mrs. Lafleur will check on this. Mr. Burgess said he felt that if this was the only chance the Commission will get to extend the sewer, they should not let it get by. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Plan application of LDB INc for a 115 lot subdivision wit acres of o en space on 71.8 residential acres and 28 acres of industria-7 landor the future park facilMy at 1175 Hinesburg RRoad There have been no changes since the last plan other than the adding of utilities for the relocated cul de sac. The developer has agreed to go along with all the City Engineer's recommendations on engineering issues.' They have also agreed to sod and seed areas as recommended by Wagner, Mendel & Noyse and Peter Owent. Mrs. Hurd noted that Mrs. Rye, an adjoining property owner, wants an American wire fence installed to keep people off their hayfield. Roger Dickinson presented the traffic study. He natd that for purposes of the study they assumed all traffic would use the main Hinesburg Rd. exit. They estimate 1150 vehicles per day at this location with 115 at the peak hour. 80-90% of this traffic will access to and from the rorth. The level of service at this location .will remain at "A". Left turns exiting will, however, experience up to 30-second delays (level of service "D"). A right turn de- celeration land is warranted;it is shown on the plan.