The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0040 IDX Drive (2)'�!. t �. .� °�� M 1) W 2) SV N01 ]) ALI DUI 4) coo PLAT ENTITLED -NATIONAL LEE INSURANCE 00." WNICH E RECORDED IN NM SLIDE 101. 61 06TANCE5 ARE ACCURATE TO THE NEAREST OO7' AND ARE SHOWN TO THE HUNOITED7H OF A FOOT FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. BEARINGS ARE ACCURATE TO THE NEAREST 10 SECONDS AND ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 6) AN ATMUFT HAS BEEN MADE 70 IOENTLFY OR DELINEATE SEMENTS RIGHTS OF WAY. LEASE LANDS, ENCRO CIAIENM ETC OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN Tiff LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EOOST WMOH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT: 7) DREEN MOUNTAM DRIVE WAS CONVETED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BIIRL.MGION N YOILUME 120 PAGE 29I. Graphic Scale F"t 20 0 20 40 60 BO R-10 w I I— Dw aY N CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FED FOR RECORD 4D. 200_ minutes _ m POye City Clerk ^fIVW ( TO BE set) wan Pw (rouNO ) cwcw7e M&A mr ( FOI,NO ) AEAfVA(*X W ( MUM ) CALCIEAID POINT CONCNCIE MaWVFNr ( TO K SET) -r si , .A m ( Farm ) HYDRANT OY"mm UTAnY LIVES 0— LAW nwcr ISTY OF VERMONT ,. JO p. 206 nap NIM 47 �� Boundary Plat „r s 0°" IDX SYSTEMS CORP. L DAB SOT TAnOR * NO. 4 35 Green Mountain Drive Oe0 IFaII 1"�20 ` South Burlington, Vt. ), /73/OI �Z TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) w'" a°°Y 22' 01 51 an, ss a Part sand F. 0. am Us VAINA n. V—t assn I&W g7p4L M N/F MEADOWVOO ENTERPRISES. LPA TCE POINT 39 / >; EL. 219.47 I� 1 I ! I / I I I I Ik� 1 \I 1 I 1 I yq I I, 1 I I 1 91 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 N/T UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT PAT PARKING MCA TO BE ROOM •4P i "WORM CONCI M PAD /i PM N GYP REAL TAiE CORP. 0— \1 \ ME PANT x n 22T.ts� 1 -- 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I \\ 1 I I I 1 I TC K4PU IS' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT i I I • 1BUILOM I I 70 or REM0 PAVED PARKING AREA \ ;i i TO BE REMOVID \ ............. ,;I I N/C ow SYS= CM. •7..... CONfRE"IE wALR .. *�0- MAKE E NWRILK .. .....�..........,� dtEl� wAtx OONCR�L 4�' ....ur...r..., �.....y \ llr � CONCRETE SIDEWAIX PAVED PARING AREA AND CURB N\ To BE MMOVED If PO IT x / \ Et. 212/2 ! _---- B• AC w�----_--wCe _ Iw 199.OB 6 h C 1w19B.BB h POINT TCE PORl - 1-198.78 f EL 202.21 S-------------- - -------------- S -------------- S -------------- _ --------- GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE . ............ EASEMENT x _� / = ------- - - - --- -_- i 201.00 - _ _ 11.19L407.0 =---� j1.1912 h \ �y� -r -- 11.197.0 WI -_� 1 S -- ------------ 1 =------------- _--------------- IS* X x' EA9FYWT - I a 7----------- _20GB1 / 1.1" 91 F 196.B1 m--IB_CMP_ / ---------Ort- 1------------- -p ........ ----------- G--------------- rw\ 199.00 ` \ F19A.7B h r \ 1wf9A08 Put; 'I \ I li i i LEGEND Gxwrm DEMOLMON WATER MAINS AND SERVICES P _-_—____•_..-_..._.._ STORM DRAINAGE LIQUID PROPANE r OR NATURAL GAS OVERHEAD POWER Lw -------LN UNDERGROUND POWER V -----•M---•--�- OVERHEAD TELEPHONE bR LWT- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CABLE TELEVISION M ------M TOPOGRAPP9 CONTOURS In PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD -- CURB PROPERTY LINE EASEMENTS FENCE _ _ O CATCH BASIN (CO) 17 VALVE ea M CURB STOP (CS) r • FIRE HYDRANT (HYD) UTILITY POLEMTC •� •O• OR ❑ TRANSFORMER u DO LARD LIGHT SIGN a i TCE COJTROL POINT STEEL REBAR T-t 20 0 20 40 60 130 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) YYOI A v19am NDI10"41OB0000 vlist-an hykh waw.Ttald=GCALIRLNb9=01 LfY wAls AY Y=AY s na wrlr a COIaOt10AL AnROVAL 11{�1®ON rrMQ1ART ANWOVAL gW6}011 ACT 2" 8111111101111110114 Fff"L AM9,"AL <•IIIIIIINI0011 ODts=RUCIrm MANRNGC W:V m esl P1«re s M• •e••:w � «n•hwWn IvR• OR .r r •• ..P.n.1.e .0 .x:. e••r•r r .. rw•« r w �1re�itle. Tn.sP •YsnrM w� w « e«M H r •I ww ••••M r w� r� MM�Wr Owr R««n Mr p•/w/ .« n+w•4 ors�a N w:PrM wYY.w« «n y nw•«•N� a:•WM SM ype/ S�wtueu•«r H •...o• wr •e••:•• ti ••e:w er•H N w waver by w D:M�Pw+r a:«o� u w ••.wr ww• W ..•wsmy r «... w nPT •«M. w wwi a` •1 / �iyS I • v I• y T e a r• r PmIPr► I r.ra}inn !b. DLra0— DM= b JLV1E OF I ve,/'/,qi k�aNLJ7 [*� IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont Demolition Plan Dnwhjl'TlWnbwt 98051-1oi Iiondmr�Q_ PID(•Q II-ft-1 DAB DLWm l SKIT Drr•: 1-Da-zoos FA 2a Scab r - 20' PLO]/Ct Iwwa , XXX )(4d, 90511405 bench Me 1 XXX Appro-d -.a r.w•nre•«..orvm ar.m-PP.:, ....e•e .P•e.> .. oT SP2 N NEADOIIOOD EHRwPPoSES. VA B AC WATER NAM W I' AC SEWER MAIN SS ------ TCE vowrrw-"' e- Ow EL. 202.24 GREEN MOUWAN DRIVE »_»__ a _»_»»_____- • __-___, N/F CUP REAL ESTATE CORP. D � / i i I I , fe' PfM511tlA.1 EASEIE//T • i YNlop - 12' X M EASE1[F/T NOTET 1. THE LOCATION OF CXISTWO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/OBSTRUCTIONS ARE SHOWN M AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY WSW ED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PR07ECTWG ALL UNDERGROUND OTIUTIES/OBSTRUCTIONS WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN 2. THE SITE PLAN 15 BASED ON FIELD SURVEY AND A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, (ICE) ENTITLED -BOUNDARY PLAT, IDX SYSTEMS CORP., JS GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT- DATED NOY 23. 2004. LEGEND 9xx7 IC SEWER MAWS � AND SERVICES «___--_-- F------"'_ WATER MAWS W»�� AND SERVICES »_»»- » STORM DRAWAGE -----------••----__-- UOUID PROPANE __»-»----/-»-»»_. OR NATURAL GAS OVERHEAD POWER -------- »OI------- » UNDERGROUND POWER --»-____-_ OVERHEAD TELEPHONE --- ------ eM--- »---- UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CABLE TELEVISION ---------- •ry____»»_ TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS «----_w-----. PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD PROPERTY LINE EASEMENTS WEILAND LIMIT TENCE SEWER MANHOLE (SMH) Q CATCH BASIN (CB) ❑ VALVE Va CURB STOP (CS) • FIRE HYDRANT (HYD) C7 URUTY ROLE 4 MTC OR TRANSFORMER BOLLARD LIGHT SIC, 4 ICE CONTROL POWT STEEL REBAR Graphic Scale jjjjj Feet 20 0 20 40 60 60 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) Ole ebh P•dL Read P.O. 1. ]OB M= e7"Ut tW"* Mmm_ V—pt 08495 18021879OOd0tlW VM Lb m O• V/.D.O wWw.lnd[BEorlmTe.oai Tx WawD• w con�TTlna AFF•nvAL n�AasworL I P•LVAINARY A OVAL SUMAU&SIM ACT LD SUMNYtYOH FINAL AH•OVAL SUWISSION CC,ON11TRUCT10N DRAmoms Imar[I,vJin renr� [uaMr• ,nlnr. we pnW vu m�w4 i ww.P r w„.mrlr. r.wy. IMaww.1 Pwd a �n[weam � Hmwn m M re w .w.[.vlNn .en a m AwMmlbn wir/wnlnHr ��i. r.An N wArwwe aur�•,aMw4 � w i .•e,Vn m M .n�ur .• [nns ratiw,v [M.r. (TQI Mm+ wy .r � •r w..• w.nP. a e...u,.MMI...r a w.A.[ r P... •s•�,I. e+l !•./m.I A. ,.r.a .ra•..a r .rw.[ w. r..w.. n,. a.•IH. ww r e.,re.w TIw A.P.r aAwm✓r r,s N nawr n. r,a Hm ww+.: ay w,.[ra Ur wwwp s,a •.eb u,wr w 1✓. nwwwr m ri... h+ sr H++ w •1 lee 6 • y • J • 1� I,�T7rT:Tl No. De•a�tbn — WI Re%fti— s 'WrfF[W�y c N0557 * _ 0f11O1 III%,V`\` IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Dr. South Burlington, Vt. Sheet TllN Existing Conditions D M)(NLmbrl m5l-TOG bawm4m, P. I}WIagw, 1 DAB DITIN.n l Dre: T1/23/200. F.B. ax ScAbe - 2C Plaj•ct Iekt I XXY X-WF1 XXY 11—h File, XXY Appro and ECI + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o.o o.o o.o o.o O.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.o a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 .3 0.3 0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 .1 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O.O +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0. 0. .5 3 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + +0.0 +D.o +O.o +0.0 +0. 01 'n In +0 0 +D.0 'nn + r 0 I e r . • . • • • ; +r; '4) It Jlf ilk' 1.5 1. 0. +0 "Z .2 y2.3 " .1 0.1+0 3.6 3.3 1. +0.0 +0.0+0.0+0.0+ 1 0.1 0 1.3�.1 1. '1.9 ''1.8 '1.8 �14 0.6 0.4 4 '0. y1.4 '1.7'1.6 41.7'1.5 1.7 0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 0 0.1 -0. '1. 1.7 ,1. Y1 1 >; , _ o +D.D + - ' + + 0.0 0.0 0. 0• 0 .3 .4 1. 0.5 0.4 0. 0.3 ,3 0.4�.�0�. 0.6 0.4 .3 0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0. 9 2.2 1.9 i 1 0.7 + 0.3 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0. 0.3 + 0.2 0.3 + 0.2 + 0.2 + + 0.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0. 2.8 j2.5 '1 2 0.6 0.3 0.2 CO. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0 + D.0 + 0.0 0.1 0. 0 0.9 1. PZ 2.1 1 D 0.4 .3 0.2 0.1 + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 + 0.0 0.0 +-+0 0 + 0.0 +0.0 + 0.1 + 0.1 2 .5 '2.4 1 0 + 0.4 0.3 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 +0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.8 �2.0 'D 9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 Q +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 0. ' .7 3.1 Y2.4 1 0.5 +001 +00.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + 0.0 0. + + i- + + 00.00.00.0o.b oo.o a + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 1.0 0 4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + +0.0 0 + o.o +o.o + o.o + o.o + o.o + 0.1 .2 + s + o. + .3 + 0.1 +o.o + o.o + o.o + o.o + o.o +o.o + o.o `o.o "o. + o + o.o + o.o + o.o + +o.o 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 0.2 +0.2 +0.2 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 '0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 '0.0 +0.0 +0.0 '0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 ++++ 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 +0.0 +++++ +D.D 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 +0.0 + 0.0 +D.0 ++++++ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 ++++++ 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 P +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 0.3 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 + 0 . 2 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 �0.2 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 • .1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 .1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 O.b 0.0 0.0 14MY +0. + 0 +0.0 + + + +0.0 2 +0.0 .2 ++ 0.1 0.1 +0.0 P+0 .1 0.0 0.0 0.1 00 0.0 01 0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.2 0.1 +0.0 +0.0 ).2 +0.1 +D.0 +0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 b.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 -0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +a.0 '0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 )0.0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.a+0.0+0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 1 0+0.0+0.0+0.0 '0.0+0.0+0.0+0.0 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol Label Qty Catalog Number Description Lamp P1 6 MP22-Q-250MH Gardco MP22, Clear Flat CLEAR 250MH Glass Lens, 20-ft Mount Height, Type V Dist. ■ Gardco MP 22, Clear Flat P2 3 MP22-3-25OMH-HS Glass Lens, 20-ft Mount CLEAR 250MH Heigh, Type III Dist., w/ House Shield STATISTICS Description Symbol Avg Max Min Avg/Min Overall + 0.7 fc 4.2 fc 0.0 fc N / A Parking Area " 1.7 fc 4.2 fc 0.3 fc 5.5:1 Plan View Scale 1- = 40' TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 0 Li o> �o 0CD �c. C CIO O C E�� N - CD C� >/�%L0 (D co X 0 Designer AAL Date Feb 7 2005 Scale 1"=30' Drawing No. 98051 Lighting35 1 of 1 •M >dl Nu nWNRMwr xTamv mxmtt aArNEr 5® AMO YWw N .IGWIpA•OE SPE�1('11106 ANOpR NM SOLD CDNS,RI/CTJ1 9E(4,f „OI/5 iOP SLY�E SIAPIIx lqv wOgOR roV1TOl euRRer ,. eRosa. caalt e,ARPA SYNL $ YARYFACIIRED [O,eID POro CR 4fpR r•eRs a Awaxnmu sMAw. mf e,A,xo:r sr,Au ec mKPm WM n PRaloxuAOA•E Ohgep P1A511C uE9t TeE BtAN2rs SNALL K fLArl9 D N ROLLS A,W SNNt 6E R�DR� ro was,DR mRMa N.wKrs wAWrAcnNm er AYER,uw excErra a eC m AYCR,cAT ami z sxosa caxma aArRo-rs a YAnRAr snu x Pu®a Au acrvAom aocs s ncsawrm a nr srE n.w. s Ariw savfs YAK asiR rnAom Rusaunr a� ro AReu uAxs uuc Fm,umv, e Na��* � sew�s..r�m fnno�i�m cRosroY coR,Ra eurmfrs�nu � et.vNEr s Nwrs cYm Ar >YE roc a sic A,n caKR NM irosoc suRf a zuxf mE NrrNers Ai . FEET a r ,rrn eom wnn oKR me wnla: sn=e: 0 SLOPE STArtrr rz�T10N INE.•I. , ui =n III ' Iu- I ITR•Fcus rAK .rr 8� o" o� YNAR sooE same FAeRc aAFN •R, rNAKI L- \ CURE DETAIL tlGIIS. TWaMfif nrn.$) Su69ASE SArN a,•.e„ W. a.wADe ar,uRn .E [VISA ,CD AxD COYPM',FD ,O M a4'n9P6 SROW rARroYc cDrz NnvAs AxcE NM .fRYDRr AcfNcr � M.wsParna sPEancAnas, srAroArm A-ra. r¢irc YaE srnwnrr Re5WwT4 4w,ERUA[ R6•wTµ MYIQOK OVKRA ,Ot' 01MAMQ3 IUK e!d AOooim P6ATK ,T ROAD A I x , a pYwLbrS AND cOasrxYccTa. 06Y SwVPO WetIN. R/A z OVUACI ALL seoA. Y.m..Ys m pr Wum.ae O[YSRY (SrArIDAip PMaCnx). c f s r ownwAlu a p wrs AeE D re rx re ix x �� DSU,a , f e � a0•<DY.W. e e a EIOrM O,Avd A•4l}t LLARAAL ,x Ir00 I[SVtl �EIiS1AIQ�0U5 PAYEMEM mrs ar r,vwon. •e OlmmeS c Rom Ca1AGi oAa:�r wRl, I' COSfR C.Wlgr BE YAWOVRfO FeeF9-�FD OfAOf E Y /\/\/\/ ro sax DDrsrrr - OMe IM V MPf � I S,OOY DRAN WIC �111 II.iFs�nero I— _ � NO2 SIO'6 REOINrtm I I ` �• I I I� a A P,c -1 Y,Pmxx I I i t l_' I I_ I I. III' 11 �, I I�—uRwsnNem wP �a l TYPICAL STORM DRAWL TRENCH s/ •_ _D- e�rzs !�� DErnoxa,r a GCS FOR BOIr Pnrr� IAh a camAcm. sruc KRr. rcorNc N �SP 61£ f ET !OR YAYf Rdf A,. DD,w rnDIR•Nc •AOK (S 14) 9ASE AAlF - ' s,m ARaor frcrs ,/z' nz cpnwr '" a•oD suvAr aT .•�. _I :A:� ,e•susmuee I I •�-;..:r:.:, _ Q LUMWAIRE FOOTING reccrucne eaarc �,� waRn flEL1Ra0E Pw �a nnez RxFu ro arc ruR YATwAcmPs DErAfs GYSE Sim SO r, Yau,rac e•mrr ^ ao• Pac neForr R,M FtY� FDD,Y,D t•Aa � rams � Pace Rxawr ,�,� x.• cvaun FaO1ftD i I I—��1 � �i.• rAKn AICK �� Jill —1 L x SR e1MIANe FpJ,NO D[TAE 6 TYPICAL LUMINAIRE A..r aMAy PIP-R,w 91A4 RE A MFLL aAOrD MO[ WETRK OOIw i0 1 Mw5,1£ PMTLL6. 9101 MAi lO rtRaa,r e<>rr WxnNc ar .Elorr srrAu E ,AR¢R MAr, ME i.EAsr mYsmox. Me' S@ (NOGs) 1f.A5T CRrwS,a a '; a-w a im�TM' m,��ir w,�a�i�nx s�uro>wo �war�vsuu�R SRIHE fpP RP1MP S,WI BE APNpKy. NMI(N, RROfw, aARIM1 Si0.YF WM d1RfWUR FA[ES HR- TRIO PUCwENi N A MRrr MiFPIOCeaG YAxNw.WM TrE SYALLfT STOWS i1tlYrt VOOS BciREER SPrANE � p�lwPp�g SRNL � M.Vd1. SGRN. R.95� W wAiER nC]IbI. RFAPCANf APO ,Flgm, 1 RIP RAP NOTES }•' YMPIIR( JO' r SPACE ALLOWS YrfM amR a APPR0IN EWAI aa,s,Rn S7aE ROM BFD A . •� , ,. mefum w,RAWr ro a cwfru+c•,m .uu yoiN a Me xPOsa covrRac swa : a+u•ea sac sa ro r u ro u Nora x nt wReAR¢ sruu eE YANrANm N A tvaRa el•o. •u rwxKni mAwxe •e sEDeme a sfoam�r aro „¢ YAN RD•o. rouodc ro aYaax NM. Aoornnv.Y s,efr YAr ee ieaDixD ro AanrAee Tre wmAARE Ro.Ao. Au sEONwi sPamt DPDrFfD. a wnam auto Tr roPY ROAY Yusr eE uYD,m RAwxR.v.r. 4 •1w F4ESSA1t1: OE NmS OI bea6 fJx,NG M SIIF 9NLL 9E CIfANEO ro Rearovr smMdr PR,OIP. A wTuxeE OTIO A FUe1K ROAowAr. ALL mWrwr srAra ll[ PREronm FPa difRwe ARr SrVN •YAN. RA m,CMg a RCIUA• 3 RK SiA9.V3p LOVSThY1CilON w,RNIC' Y,ALL S{ i Ar A•. PRDC® FOP A reWRr t£rADm a w' N¢(A1Nc Au nRuxxo RAn 7E TYPICAL STAERIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE iMAY 17 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TOE) Ql B.I•k Yed CGM<aR4rI S•ee®01f EIIG1rW11ll AFrRpV=••®pll AR }.fe=•ellOf.N •lilLL .\lIIWAL y1•IM•JN res•r.un•DN YuwRas x Rom. Rom. ter. ��»r�a ....:rv.'.•.`rrr.:.� r •rreN ➢n Rr•p wm r •rRr.• tyy.W,A. �..�� ter:--• f10. Dept•, [aY• � 4YlC•6 5� 10i'VERR��Ai / Fxr„rMPL110^ a� hgsY7Mle IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION s5 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont Ymft Details >Nx.gNW6v: frost-rW [rymlm: e >fea mrrpr: DAR Dx.NR, sui eR: ,/ro�ros 3de: swoRN Arad DI BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES v. 297 p. 623 V PARTNERSHIP 214 p. 451 105 P. 21 WAY :6 LLSON PARTNERSHIP v. 194 p. 330 mb. 105 p. 21 THIS FIAT M R ccn ON THE F 1 mN: i) DEEDS RESEIRCHED M1 THE CITY OF SOIRH ILIM ON LAND RECORDS. 2) CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSES CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION ON 7 "S AND 11124/98. BEARING'S ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN ALONG A LEG OF THE TRAVERSE 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS. 4) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE LANDS, ENCROACHAfENTS ETC. OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 5) THIS PARCEL MAY BE SUB,ECT TO SPRING RIGHTS AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 11, PAGE 431. 6) THE 70' WIDE RIGHT OF WAY WAS ORIG8IALLY SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 105, PAGE 21. THE CITY, ADJOINING LAND OWNERS AND OTHERS MAY HAVE RIGHTS OVER THIS STRIP. 7) IDX DRIVE WAS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON W THE FOLLOWING DEED; 7) FROM BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES RECORDED IN VOLUME 015 PAGE 44 2) FROM DE74MS BLODGETT AND GERALD MILOT RECORDED IN VOLUME 275 PAGE 703 AND 3) FROM BOP REALTY ASSOCIATES RECORDED IN VOLUME 477 PAGE 398. GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE WAS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9N VOLUME 126 PAGE 289. 8) THIS PARCEL WAS CONVEYED TO IDX SYSTEMS CORP. IN VOLUME 501 PAGE 513 AND VOLUME 501 PAGE 51& O I q I 0 LEGEND RERAR ( TO At SET ) I I • woN RrE (rwND ■ CG zw uGNL.ENT ( rumv PLAZA INVESTMENTS PA + at axrvdY rDIMO ( I v. 272 p.218 LOT a C YI t1 O TED PO CAINLAiD RnNT Comxcrz mommENT (To K SET) I P-------- G ------- NATURAL GAS LNE {� S I --�-2---- SAMTMYSE.fR a of H 1 -------• G ------- I SmOM GRAM >t O SEWER A uTknr -------- p------- C P. 123 iA C II I 2DYFA5 pl. MEWEAD UTIITY LRdSMR U.S. ROUTE 7 SHELBURNE ROAD CeRphk Scale OWA2E MME MATEIf/2LBt SDT ADO PROP= ROAD R NBrz T 12A+e/es SMI Feet LOT GGNs'a,DARax 01114m cm 60 0 60 120 ISO 2.40 IUNYWI. Dr — — OV SOUTH BURLMOTON CITY CLERKS OFFICE RECEIVED FOR RECORD AD. 79 et O'clock mlwtw m and recorded in Vokm. Pop. Attest Cfty Owk � of v add. IDX SYSTEMS CORP. I�.m.w 98051 LxL S p�TT �, Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, Vt �.,K„�. 0. TAYLM it ND. Ae6 * shoot a"Boundary Plat qq 1/IS/98 fur 1'�60' I-,TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) J0p529 5, A.. tot . I. a kOA 2es WO..L V.sest . 1ao21 t71•l281 STORM DRAIN STUB IWATER VALVES N204.97 BUILDING 7ENCE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ' EA P' A.C. ; TELEPHONE WATER MAIN - - - - - - S1U8 /. -SEWER STUB Y7C �I I N i �! CON7E CURB I �213.M DRIVEWAY - - - - - - - - --2 a aAss ' `tiwEll ------- - -- -----------'=--r-_--_---------- -_---_ -'rr,_=52JT'ATER M - -_ -- �_. GO BEWER YN I'WATER- -_ / I � 216.81 _ Wi �6' AC SEWEA4YABl ' VALVE III.t3 1 CO I.275.37 aAtB �___ ____ _ ---_»_ I I.III.f2 _-�,�{---------T------ T _I GREEN MCRWAM DRM ! ,T yj -----_ pit tc 4' PVC UNDERDRAM / I -------------- r �------- `Tcwsrz smEWA=c'�L--- 1sce -Am saps{ STORM /h fii 77 �- ✓// --�� \ter/._\/- 1/Y .I 1 \l It \ \ 1 1 �1111 iii g �arh210.t3•�/\��=/--.�^` Illll I DI, `�_� _ii _._-��'_ ____ -_ ----- �►A16.Tk mAysaoRMEIf Ta -.r- ` / /EAs 4r10a / /~ l7>\2'1•`_ // { POBE'R 11lllll IAroERDRAiI+.////~ \`� _T�'DI\ \ \ \ _ / / / _.wD caNcaE>EcucaD"�t---,"7°th.+ ai- - -- �' ; /'-��Exn�iC+er' \.\ / / \\ '_ 1 / ` _ ✓' Ill1 1 XY[>BAS/i / / ;;•. =_ -1•M.IYJS- r6W1',t� -"'� r /'t _ _--"''ram/' I P\`- / A"'�� ill i v �/ �� 'r�- - -` - - i3� I /11 tw�c I I - � � / � -Aliie;).66 �� /// 11 llll 1 r i .Me6Err� ///✓' _c sI•iK= \,�- ` 1 1�iMT6J.4s --,r' '+\\\I1� �--'___/ till k riD4.2s',.� i / ' - 't:!\_ \I /(�_61if1ez?r `�---' it`' R-,e6.a »---- CONCRIM / j / i//11 1 t is 11 �- �i '/ / _7z• / ".- I 7!�\ '\ I � . 9.57 \ \ till I U4�'� -,Kr i II 11 I t r ' \ 111 •' j "- E-,i "V1' - / \\ I / f l LEPHOrE 1\ \ 11 I! { _ � / � / , PEDESTAL \ \ I I�TPAD4 r -,r I ------- r kit co III ', � a� . �192JS- r \ rA a NN------------- ll 11 I 11 11 r11^��'T / "M'_+a„/ f. '\/W67178 12•NDPE \ 1 -'V Luwmw (TYMc4L) / / =- - � a�I S. duo-»3 r2 IS PK �'`'f•'` y CONCRETE PADS - -srWER - - •�vgles.le / a I 1I / II��' -- r 4 GENERATOR PAD 1 I2' h.t79.» I I h.f92.N 1 ,7j / 'r; I.IPo9 �' .'►' Qw ' I Y V GB l.fiia IS 112• h.I79.ee-- { { 1 M.I62561 i' ,p -In 1.19 F77' J.sWA740P--yaa61: 2Pa ; - -- - ,i. "✓, � �iez76 6•r /Iv, T _L eK- _ 4Bf; -----_ \ _� ' ceI 1 / o '•'`�4_.- OB1K.e O \ LL..s=-- -- �- -waKao. - -- = �18e5 ice\ l ; { �J / r1LL11/6662 ' ; := -•f ,: { 1.16266 8• ►K e\. • - _ - - 1 I - 1 ` 6CONgrEIE ,•/ i _ 7p'•. 2A �3D06 �,�\ i / _-_-__-_•� / ` / TELEPHONE LEPHO E SIOEWAI.K i ' • r.' ApK- 18113-179.9] 6• PK _-__-- WATER VALK �\ 1 I 1�+r NNoLE - •SLEEK o-179.13 .176 OG -- �-'------ S/ LA `, i I WE OJ / � GENERATOR '. '•--f--_ 4=- - - - --W --_lY e•� aAss D2 --- = l { « ' SEWER MH I � 3€W[B CD CB 162.83 - - - ---_- -.S_.. �' I �I I-1]3.A2 1�182.62 _".80 1.178.63 L I I.1]3.35 ELEG,y" r, - -- - •A1 v� = lso.32 � _ 1 r CB �182.27 YMD DRAB/ I 1 I POKER POLL cA.W31EEK { ' ; / 162.8C 1.179.17 IM.Ie XypRANT �j; , III / I / �� h17B.e6 SEWER MN C8 E{ III ' fe6.76 YARD ORAw RETARNNc WALL 01 I.laGes root,$ aQ 179.77 7h. 1 CONCRETE WALL 12• PVC - ' I �w 190 OQ pM 16' 1-175.67 1 12 M f 73.47 , I III NroRANT Ilsrto s• ►K � I e• wat7as7 1 12• M n..1. - „ ` `ib' I I I YARD DRAN 1 Is h. 173.50 cB ' ! It I 1 - , I CIS Ce r' 1K64 I I oVEM1EA0 POKER ' I L1NC A- IN.02 177.17 1M'7A 6�dp 1 is• h. In7f 20010X WM 1 h.176.011 lil Y ! OAS- »�'---- o-17e.e1 .Y 116.EB6• 16uo- IT2 lRAle66 i eat.I73.2D ' 1` { 1 _ 17D h.n3 2 eC ` / fs I f0• MI7312 Vi� • RE7AMNE WALL p I "7' 0.Q •%\J/. VAULT& TRANSFORMER I I n r 70 a I v� i 75' h.173.07 I 1 77 .36 1 Is• wl.n3.a2 cc. 77• 6°60. S I I 1 18• h.16L53 oa0. '•M r p17r. m pinit YAA.172.41 1�77 --\ i { i 6• PK�SF6EA YMp pRAR,I ••• E 1-11184 in'� wes.52 1.IK61 12• / P f I I I / 15• M167.s3 1 I r>• �- -- 5•-i------ -- s170.11 '� 1.169.W ' A ` 1\ , N , i i 1 16• ouo-/6ZS3 ✓ �� sf� CO. ` •/•,.``'i }»_50 - { _-.. K'_ I t2• p `• T `2`V I I CB f,. N.te rim , 1 END N aa,f i' CURB % I I MiT.O UnIITY $YMBO'S 1.iT7.A0 I { I i G'0' •r ' i}. iG4�1c g• r A SIDEWALKHYDRATIES SEWER MANHOLE O 10•.� a A _ 4l I % W LLAWINC ; d d \ ` i i I SEWD?NT SERER MNNS STORM DRAINAGE ` ``� j SERER MX I L S' 60MCRf1E I 1v. I I SERER 4N AND SERNCES -S- MANHOLE 1 I N CA), (p n7n40 { SIDEWALK • CM R I t / r.17A.79 WATER If `••�� 1-163.21 AND SERAIWS -W- CLEANOUT n161.N PNC `oy -.\ Qf' ,e ]I { I II 6.,5.2131 1.173AB � I 1 - -_- - �A � -'--_ E• d 6 SLR S ' I ' , I I STORM DRAINAGE -50- CATCH BASIN ❑ NYDRANi .. _ .�_ - - _ - 1{ L i UNOERDRAM -UD- END ETCTON 181.56 1 I / 1 .'7S. daD�` CURB ` // \ •M/ I! RDOF DRAM -RD- *176.37 I 1 � ,/[, JN (M) •t \ � h 6.2 \ { I , I VALVE ' STORM DRAW WATWSERNCE { II \ r ' LICUID PROPANE CONCRETE 177.OR M i 51UB 1.163.0 1 { ' 1 I I OR NATURAL GAS _C_ FIRE HYDRANT (} SIDEWALK / {}■51 ' `` tiM1t0.7( 'B 7 I I-LLLI OVERHEAD PDRER -WP- WATER WELL (� r I y \ \ C.O. .' i I W1.170. I r jl i I J 1 R ' !�i'' V`1`p� L \ \ .Y' ' I AND TELEPHONE D -UP@T- THRUST BLOCK I.l 70 P _ _ {I of .eB/ \. 15 81. / �°R 1M773.>0 ` `\h »1 d_-----------»-----W-`-»w__, I i END CAP [ 1 wo-1T. 1 i -»• a DU. aA55 -117.49 52 WATER wiN 4 /e• rK� i, i 11 I I n.i6a�F�'1g8 1 i 1 vnun POLEo 'I 1 Wo-188.S6 I rr�� 0.0. I I I I arc DR Jj TRANSFDRMER SYYBOtS TELEPHONE PEDESTAL o ( LUIVIVAIRE Q i j / I* 171.9• 1 ' , r ��' , /' / i' \\ \ �� 1 hv.. 16l.62 T-BAR FOUND C IS• M/86.03 �1QQ 1 ' MON PIPE (FOUND) • �' // x"' / / / /' \ \ \\ 1T.I7 1• PVC {NOERORAM I Ie' M163.2e 7 { I ,/� I �- PAVED ?'�� \ \ 1 12• MIe6.32 I «Io-i ' WALK CONCRETE MONUMENT ` \ Y I , }� ,T ': ' -�'' - 1 ` •� 1 165.27 \ \ I IS• MIe6.32 (FOUND) co h/j10�E \ \\ \\\\ 1 ' -1 II I ! STEEL REBAR (FOUND) O Z1 63 \d- 51011YiN \\\\\ \ \ --- --------------- / PVC TIDE CONTROL POINT OE1ENl10N BASKIL ---- _. 8�• D.l. CLASS I-' I STEEL REBAR IINDERGRO1Rro GCE CONTROL POINT , \•, K .�� ~ 1t \ \ \\ \ \ o-130.6 h/6I.I ELEGiBIC.•OCC_�---_---- JrATEB jR¢_ bl� / hr tMDERGR0IND' _ -_- I PK NAIL .•��' ELECTRIC BOx Y \\\\ \\ \ - ----- __ °.r ir" rG&w \ ` _-_-_------ I I V _-� !.• IK w>r� i' ' \ TOP.a 6Aref ; \\\\ \\\ \\ J�_irr��---- ;. { /I TCE CONTROL POINT I •'� -•�• \ \\ r _---�-__ / I WOODEN HUB ♦4\ . of DETEWODW \\ \ \ \ Gtemc \ ----�""'t ) / / I1 I GB ••\ ♦�._-/� fb l BASIN \�\' _-- 1 1 I / / / % NON PIPE i0 BE SET 0 SD ------, LC r_ _ _ _-_-DL4ENAirA _ - _ / / I i I i .. E.o •, Ln1.6s \ 1 \ \ .�_�_- ___ __ J�1 `----• i _ iltsfr-_ / / 1 1 I Ml 7.20\ 1 MIK76 I `•,� \ •\\-»---�� /, /•`\ 11 \_err _-_--__ �/lrl}B5 I sTI -115. l' II r-\\ \ _ -_-- // / // 1 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PUN BASED ON TRUDEECORD L CONSULTING TINGED ENGINEERS r.t73.62 I `��^\\\ \ \` \ --- / 1 !� LAST REVISED 7ATION L0 PREPARED BY 7ASE 11 CONSULTING ENGINEERS. e 1 ) / I ) ----- 1 Ill -•--- -- 7t760F•6 . aF I X /' $EWER MM SURVEY VERIFICATION LIMITED TO THE PRAY 11 TEMPORARY PARKING AND HYDRANT \ I �`•� _ .v�... L__ T _ _ / I ! iGRUC1IME -x- E l 11 I \` I-167.2 .t5C37 ACCESS ttl GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 1 ` / • /' _T - -- -- ---- . ......... 1 ----------- --^--------------"' ---------- --------L------------ IL----------- ' - ---------�-� - -'--- ------------------------------------------ ------- - �-- ------ ----- t, IY W71RR MAN `6• GAS MAN IY RW/ER 6• GAS MAN MAN CONCRETE CURB h75B.93 J p, SF$LALIM ROAD ROUTE 7 i EDG COre AKYENTf\�pM w A END OF CURB ` 1 Glephlc Sl:afe - - Eeet 90 0 50 100 150 200 �1 11 1 1 11 11 I I 1 11 11, 1� 1 1 1 II G-phk sw. het 30 0 30 60 90 120 1 GENERAL NOTES 1. All plant material in the plant schedule shall be nurser grown in accordance with ANSI in accordance with Z.60.1 Standards for measurement of nursery stock. 2. All plants shall be guoronteed by the Contractor for a period of two years from dote of receipt of Provisional Acceptance of the completed installation by the Owner. 3. Replacement plantings will be required prior to Final Acceptance for any plants which are missing, not true to specifications, have died or are unhealthy or uncharacteristic of the species (due to excessive pruning, dieback or other reasons). 4. All plant materials shall be selected and tagged at the nursery by Landscape Architect. 5. The Landscape Architect's approval is required for any plant material substitutions. 6. Contractor is responsible for reporting any discrepancies and receive written instruction from the landscape architect prior to preceding. 7. All shrubs and trees will be sproyed with the anti—desiccont "Wilt—Pruf or approved equal) prior to the first Winter over season i.e. no later than November 30). S. The Landscape Contractor shall have the General Contractor locate all underground utilities in areas to be landscaped prior to commencing any excavation. Adjustments to tree locations will be allowed where utility conflicts are clearly a problem and with prior site approval by Landscape Architect. 9. All plant bed, shrub and tree location shall be staked in the field by Contractor for Landscape Architects approval prior to installation. 10. Adjustments to plant beds shall be approved by Landscape Architect. 11. General Contractor is responsible for all erosion control measures during construction. 12. All disturbed areas are to be topsoiled and seeded. 73, Mulch shall consist of double —shredded hardwood mulch or approved equal and Contractor is responsible for providing samples of mulch to Landscape Architect. Mulch plant materials as shown on plan and details. 14. It is the intent of this contract to avoid any disturbance to existing trees or shrubs on site other than those specifically designated for transplant or removal. 15. Liquidoted damages for trees damaged by construction operation shall be $500 per caliper inch. Shrubs shall be $100 each. 16. Contractor is responsible for all damage due to his operations inside and outside the contract limit line. 17. Contractor is responsible for checking spot elevations and verifying proposed grades by providing grade stokes. Grades must be approved by Landscape Architect prior to proceeding. 16. Contractor shall blend new work smoothly with existing grades at contract limit line and/or limit of construction line. 19. Contractor to verify that sub des are 4 inches below finished grade prior to spreading Zoom for seeded areas. 20. All walks, step treads, and wall caps to have 1% cross pitch unless otherwise stated. 21. Prior to commencement of any construction, all existing trees to remain shall receive: tree protection fence O outer edge of dripline whenever possible. 22. Site furniture and wall locations to be verified by Landscape Architect prior to installation. 23. Light fixture locations may be field adjusted with Landscape Architect approval. 24. Walkway layout to be approved by Landscape Architect prior to construction Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 MOTE E10STTNG PLANT MA7MAL FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAWM SHEET LST DATED FEBRUARY 2oa1 PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL AND GENERAL NOTES FR01H A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAONLR SHEET LI LAST REMSED 1/21/2DW.. �• /1 EXISTING TREE 0* PROPOSED TREE PLANTOMG SCHWULE ANRENAIF W f rAwrwl RAMC a MilLK A's QUANITTY SIZE rblmRlaN AG "CANLTOER ORANDPLORM ROM MU ROBN HILL SrRNCEBERRY 27 1 1/2' - 1 /3/4' B a e. 9NOLE STEM GT GLMMA TIHACORHOS AWERI4 AIPEWAL HONEILOCIIST 13 2 1/2' - T B e B PN PRNs N mN 46TRMN raE 4 a, - r B t D n fi GENERAL NOTES 1. All plant material in the plant schedule shall be nursery grown in accordance with ANSI In accordance with Z.60.1 Standards for measurement of nursery stock. 2. All plants shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for a period of two years from date of receipt of Provisional Acceptance of the completed installation by the Owner. 3. Replacement plantings will be required prior to Final Acceptance for any plants which ore missing, not true to specifications, have died or are unhealthy or uncharacteristic of the species (due to excessive pruning, dlebock or other reasons). 4. All plant materials shall be selected and tagged at the nursery by Landscape Architect. 5. The Landscape Architect's approval is required for any plant material substitutions. 6. Contractor is responsible for reporting anyy discrepancies and receive written instruction from the landscape orchitect prior to preceding. 7. All shrubs and trees will be sprayed with the anti —desiccant "Wilt—Pruf" ( or approved equal) prior to the first Winter over season (i.e. no later than November 30). B. The Landscape Contractor shall have the General Contractor locate all underground utilities in areas to be landscaped prior to commencing any excavation. Adjustments to tree locations will be allowed where utility conflicts are clear)y a problem and with prior site approval by Landscape Architect. 9. All plant bed, shrub and tree location shall be staked in the field by Contractor for Landscape Architects approval prior to insyallotion. G R E E N M O U N T A IN DR IV E 10. Adjustments to plant beds shall be approved by Landscape Architect. 11. General Contractor is responsible for all erosion control measures during construction. 12. All disturbed areas ore to be topsoiled and seeded. 73. Mulch shall consist of double —shredded hardwood mulch or approved equal and Contractor is responsible for providing samples of mulch to Landscape Architect. Mulch plant materials as shown on plan and details. 14. It is the intent of this contract to avoid any, disturbance to existing trees or shrubs on site other than those specifically designated for transplant or removal. 75. Liquidated damages for trees damaged by construction operation sholi be $500 per caliper inch. Shrubs shall be $100 each. 16. Contractor is responsible for all damage due to his operations inside and outside the contract limit line. 17. Contractor is responsible for checking spot elevations and verifying proposed grades by providing grade stakes. Grades must be approved by Landscape Architect prior to proceeding. I& Contractor shall blend new work smoothly with existing grades at contract limit line and/or limit of construction line. 19. Contractor to verify that subgrades are 4 inches below finished grade prior to spreading loam for seeded areas. 20. All walks, step treads, and wall caps to have 1% cross pitch unless otherwise stated. PHAS ING 21. Prior to commencement of any construction, all existing trees to remain shall receive: tree protection fence ® outer NO EVSDNC PLANT MATERIAL FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAGNER, SHEET L5J DATED FEBRUARY 2003, edge of dripline whenever possible. GENERAL NOTES FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE 22. Site furniture and wall locations to be verified by Landscape Architect OF KETH WAGNER SHEET LI LAST RENSED 1/27/20W.. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL FROM KAREN PETTERSEN. TOE prior to installation. 23. Light fixture locations may be field adjusted with Landscape Architect approval. � EXISTING TREE 24. Walkway layout to be approved by Landscape Architect prior to construction. OPROPOSED TREE 4ti PLANTING SCHE.DLU AJWV1Ar MT eOrANICAL NAME e2smm 116M OUAF((!�Y S@ ['oKlarrlew AF ACER x FREEMANY 'AUTUMN BLAZE' AUTUMN BLAZE FREEMAN MAPLE A 2 1/2' - 3' B e B Fo FORSYM/A DYATA EARLY FORSYIMIA U 3 GAL CONT, FP FRAKINUS PENNSriYANICA 'PATMCRE' PATMDRE GREEN ASN ] 2 1/2' - 3' B e' e MC IIALUS CORALBURST CORALBURST ORA19—LE 10 A' - 5' B e B, NEA- P. PMus WGRA AUSTRIAN PINE 12 1, - T' B A, B Graphic Stele OP OUERCU5 PALUSM6 AN OAK IJ 2 1/2' - Y B t B Feet TCG T A CDROATA GREENSPIRE GREENSPAC UTTLELEAF UNDFN 3 2 1/2' _ T B A B 30 0 so 60 90 120 1 F1--------------------- ---- ---- w 1 � 1 1 \ \ \ ---------- ----___-_ _-______— —_ _--__- WE COYMMERClAL ZONE DX DR { ( COAIMERCiAI! 2 rAj ZONE \ ``1''' 11 / 1 _ 1 1 711 so r { \ 1 / of 1 1 I T 1 \ 1 1 � p \ 1 , { / / R 1 r h 05 III � i i I ; \♦-� � �� / � � �`♦\\ �� - 1 4-- { y I' LN", 1 1 1 I r If ' 1 �— { � I / ri I I 1 1 1 I I I I g Ora { { 1 `♦ �♦ ♦♦♦ \ 1 � _ \ ' '- - Il --ram � a �., ` / / / ! 1 _—_ -"- 1 1 .� 40 IDX Drive South Burlington YT 01/10/2003 1'-30' m Z s ` REMS*Vs TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS �q � � ^= =� =:c �,• sv DAB SITE PLAN — PHASE III -- - ;--------- -"- - - - - - - �J GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE tam a.-rwo r PVC foe / k, of / r.fe3os / II �/ 3' M STDNE Ij ffXWAWV awAtc rTN s• / 1 1 1 1 ----- mu7NfNr I 1 rw.L1 0/-in o�e•w — _ — — ------ - //\ 1 Ao' 1 I Xr --— — — — — — — — — — — Graphk Seale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 SEVER NH1 BUILDING 1 1s 1. n3.00lrzu 1 le• M FFE-185.0 1 wl. nt.0 VAOLT a 1RANWVRMP 200 IDX DRIVE FFE-185.0 Y wx sms LwED SWA F T1PE 1 RIPRAP P RIPRAP AWAC PIPE MET 1 i i 1a' 1 SE7BApt ' COMMACI ro vERrrr wrolr PmaR ro IXWSTRI1C110N AND amiss rwowos elfN PRCILCT YANADE71 I 1 1 NH � r.fe6.Ib se -1e5.65 I *1DD. IP I I / 1 I t I iElEF410NE . 1 YMwaE erruweaus vAwIEAr r RtETAL • Go 00 YRAn eapR rnxn rAeRm e.Y/ auN aALn WR9Cn Rlw GRAL4 1 CURB DETAIL Yn,r. irppnNc ugxRWrs rAoonn av aWu none¢ usn 2 SEE YANUrACnxpT SPECS Ir! 9pLT PnrmN uwJ. a oRrnucTm aui iEmv AmnNL �T�a PG S'�S�fROPwAIL QOCf rUR NLORONc nAWNu IYID NWF Aw OSIER uwr eO f •LRIRNNL .— fi —) •IEPwE r roeARv MAE e - siEEL MalaN eDLrz +/i• Plc cgrminr aV.• Pvc sp r0 ._. Rm sN r) _ _i A : �'';' ��.' •.:...� !e• sWLOnsr tucTxrx armem orLDucma iT '�� '.' I I [ I lm I�r+r 1 .• 1 12. ALm osWRm e.ELmopc PLR MT. 2So raEc ([ _� LUMNJAKE FOOTING U A reuwL cpiNr (rrvC q] (v.ar .asJ —BA4 COURSC (TPC I) (v.pr raR) —CAYARD mAYi NAm tOrp5) :m9ppT SLAW A1gN rAgvm rLLA,RN N AaxRmMQ M,N [ .CIWfR'S rCOYKNWnWS _• g � P�Ina � IIMi.:.:<—A r� l; 59S SMRAY SAIm N9RW .ND SUrATAa[ SNWAO E cLws+Nx•Im ARp wloAelru ro % DERsroN: RmPN rmmANQ w�w+Ywr„s�r �r nvNA�avunw la�c:w�uovww i nA.s eiEx wrorta nwnKi ro Awo wmas�sorls ARn owc'Wunwv. ner srwYa w.ERN. i ai0'AR ALL 9wRA.4 YAIOgNa W ISi Y.g1M/ mm,r rSTNR)AM NroLroRi ,�I,;,DOmRAN © BITUIKINOVS PAVEMENT DO©O00 I00000® I�o000O I000®0© raysmucna+ sPErnunLns rW+ sLWc nAesaAml R090N CwneW eLAwcri ! pOaipLl CONNW N.gRS! SHALL eC YAMIrACiYgD OI.I/ILn Reap [R(dSKR.rNPi a9 AWRCULnAPAt 51IGw BLYIIfET 91N1 E [ONEEO MIN A PNDIppLTFADAeIE CSIwIDFD PUSM Y35rr. % NAIeIC15 SIW! E rlNwaMm N RCWS AND SMALL r iDuu ro pmnN cw1RW ewRns YATIurAciuRm er .YopcYl uoasm pN r aiw AARR,uN Wm/. z LRpsary caNmW euRRtn r gATnNc SHALL E PUWa oN Al! EDR.1pED AaPLa OC9olAiLD a %sir PUN. ]. Arip 4I16 MAN eFL: oLAp[p EASW4rY Wor ro I1NAl rnAn¢ uc rAlWIIW1n Alm nnmc xAVL eLp mNPLETEL:. % [RavLA mNrRQ RUNiWr nw.. r uPPEn NWRS AT TK SEAMS, ANp MCNaRED At % iaE Axa 1[L^ 6' 4LP6 eaRl NC NAIe(E} 6 xWgS PEEP Ai TE laC K Yaq AND COMA wn1 WvSWL SlAME tR SIAP(C RE NAlNFIS A! . PFFT M C(gip eqN wArz aLfR ne pgfd Aa4, u SLOPE STABUJZATION Rw-RM vuu r A .na cR.pm ROcx YrWRr OOw/ ro + RRr srE PARaats, auw rAAi so PLR TT ar MC YIXRNC er Ypoir 9uu E LARQR igYr nR IFAST ONOr90N 'rTrc va !Noes) Lusr aRerlsw I-v z-aa Li a-Y ry a-e0 m A qnL IXAOm ROIL( M.rlletC 9YLl r DETIrSD AS AYSIIAK COYPaS[R NWARnr r % WlWR STONE Slti$ RUT MM A m6iR]ENT YXLYa' Or allffiS STltS' ro TILL % PROL3151Qr SYNI£R MIDS RelY6N SRNES STDrCR A-rGP IDLNL E AArEWIfD. ROWI BRWfp, WINTRY SroE 11III1 wRL'WRM M(CS NA- uL PLALflp1, N A RGr xlF/LLDCRNO YANNFR N!N % SMALLER SnY16 fYOMp WmS SETYFEx Rcp smNLs. Tra sTWms sNAu E NARD. • Rom. assrARr ro RATw Acnw, Ewumm+c, um palAetL iW.' % NxPOA N,ER000 RP RAP NOTES N. P. OR PSMS RLTEA m 9iC ww rcw YMu•.cnwcns annva L9 6 SWIM[ S1LII PWf .�Oe�R{. )GU ZrSRII r�(G�� d aYRs ARFAe A' I �• rAvm AREAf :,.` . I RANT allogo raanYL TL11pY I I I �n aL, L�.nNAgE rOL,xL DErAE TYPICAL LUMINAIRE upurNLR xmrt rroti Q Se' NRL MOCNl RnN N'tlgGSID rogn+c R7A7a m' I'Rl[ LOWL! gr1N iA• naocn IDOwrc N' RRRYN. >c I .FAQ ALLORs 5pnx OR APPROL[D EW.I � PLR rMi Isu • YA WNnRO SnRK Rpla RD Naha: f. ST�AErdD [Nn1AVQ ro E LwSwiIC1[D AS 4bRR ON % GOvoN PI.YlS i Wnmm sroY sYr ro r vs W u NCA¢ a nY LYNMQ wLAu r YAxTARrm x A mNpniDx rrw .aL Pw[W/r IA.WwL dP rtORN: Or SIaYUlT W W M YAM RpA0. Ppwo+c roD RRES9Np qN AannwAc zrWe YAT r EaYNm ro rmrArr YANIAw nR pnuNQ Raw. Au mN[w! mum. DADPPm. Wv Nlren avTO % rORY Raw Yurr E RnOL>n RAYmAm.r. YRN L(QSSArRT. % M®S 6 vOsalr [APW ne 9R' 9W1 r LiFAYD W rMp✓i YWYpr ARgr ro pnYNQ avN A ILquC ALL SmM T SNALL� �WrlEo IPIV INIFANL N!Y sraq/ aeAx. TrecDieL4. s %rart sIARR® mramucnW� pis..gz slwi nARr A, No rrra® loRrrrN W as NouDNL Au iWRMc RAm. 7 TYPICAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE aDTM �� X \ \ RdDYF EXISIMNO CURB SECTIONS AND FORM NEw DROPPED CURB, OR NEW PTAI CURB T \ ROJOK rULL SECTIONS AND PROMDE E—STOV A NT FRIER AT NEW ENDS r wrr L A E FACE PA CURB 13' FROV CAD .X16Ni AND FACE a CURB 3' THICK PAVEMENT PATCH � ACCESS CURB CUT _ NOTE. ADAPTORS CAN BE A,C)UHTED ON ANY ANGLE Opppp m AST NON M-EO RA RD QRAIE SEE AID. NTUYWOUS PAYLYdT I � / 1 r� I I �1Y' DRAM BASH > 6' PK sOR 33 ADAPra+ I WU � \ `6' PK SDR 35 OUTLET 6' CRAM OR AS REOTRRED BY f mEER FOR USE MTN VARIOUS TYPES of OT/RETS NTH FOR N-20 (HEAW IRAFFTC) SITUATIONS WATWTIGHT ADAPTORS BACNFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED SCR-35 SEWER STONE OR GRATEL MATERIAL YrCVNC CLASS I OR I AS SPEARED W AS1N A-2000 COARIIGAIED PK ULTRA -RIB PK D3321. BAC nU. MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UNIFORMLY W TO' UM AND CpRUDARO POLYCDMEME COMPACTED. BASIN�._,._D. �7l DRAW BASIN MH TTAmL roNMnrwO DNI.Imez usr 1EW:m ToiFon6 IR-6ns FOR PAYED SURFACES " l YA 0 2• A r� '•. 6"3 ° REPLACE TOPSOIL SEED. AND MULCH 01fRFlLL 70 ALLOW :OR SETREMENT. FNISNED ROAD GRADE {� G GRC{R1D SrABNJZA RON FABRIC DYER THOROUGHLY COINACIED SELECTED BACKFXI. FROM TREHIN WCAVAM111, FREE OF SR)NES COMPA iMA J' . pAM L# COMPACT BACMYI N 6' LIFTS. SAND (MSPAFl S00X OR EQUAL) � 7HE SIDES OF TItENCHES SHALL BE SHEETED M SLOPED 1D V05MA STANDARDS •: f r STORY DRAW THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3/1' CRUSHED STONE BED04WG FOR CAMP, PK. OR HOPE PINE. 00� ° • -� °�" 08 ° musTURRED SaL W J NOTES ON STORM DRAW TRENCH 'P O O^ D 4, • l )n gV, A NET TRENCH 111111 PRIOR TO NSTAWNG BEDDING ME LETTER V SOMN ON THE OE a INDICATES /ME pAYE1ER Di THE RIPE. DEPTH OF STDRH GRAIN UNES VARY, REFER 70 PLANS FOR DEPTH W APPROPRIATE LOCATONS �1 TYPICAL STORM DRAW TRENCH SI] IAI.EOt C6N9AISK CNgLC15 LAST RWStD a, I.M M-aOTN 5'PCUFICABOMS: 1/2' EXPANSOV/CONTRACTRMI JOINT NTTH ASPNALT MMREWA/ED FW BOARD FILLER EVERY W FEET. SCORED DIP TOOLED -MT (1- DEPTH OR 1/3 THE MtDEPTH CF WAIN) MIN A SEPARATKN DISTANCE EQUAL TD THE w. O< THE sOEWALN. N -BREAK M COVPLErE .ANT EVERY X FEET. NOTE WTAMM5 ARE TIRICAL AND MAY BE &DOZED Epp SPEWX SIZE CONOTIDNS. S' S B' 5• RXCK CONCRETE NEAR COTNSE (A000 Pm) "Will �d MMMUM 6' GRAM BASE 0 TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK (YIRM ENWRO CC OR A/PRDIED 3)SLt FEMM SHALL BE INSPECTED NEWLY, AM AFTER EACH SIONMICANT PREpHTAROM EVENT. EQUAL MAY BE STASTITIIIEp.) MANTENANCf SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. AND SEDIMENT SMALL BE REYOKD WHEN RULOES' FILTER FANIIC, OR No," NE FABRIK STAAE OCKLP^ N THE SET ,ENCE (YAK 10' O.CJ 1)BROKd STAKES SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPRY. WY FABRIC NTD GROUND (NEW. 67) COMSIR WON SPFYJFICAIIONS SILT FENCE SHALL BE EITHER PRE-fABRICATED ERDSWN CONROL RNCE (YMAPI CNWR,ROKL OR EQUAL} OR NYSRYICTED-M-MACE, AS SPEC*= IEREW. 1)CONCE SHALL BE TER FA PARALLEL A GROUND FACE CONTOURS, AND AA1V FIBRIL SIDE SHALL FACE UPSTREAM; MESH AND sTANES SHALL FAG[ DDWNSREAY E)DEEP O SHALL BE W E OF NCE U 6 BILNLS DEEP S WSTII[AM WE OF IC (10 IRIC EXCESS MP CF . FABRIC (W HCH B INCHES) 311ALL BE PLACED N' A TEED, TMND'H SMALL BE THIS M ED AND COMPACTED. NT- ADENR U W THIS MANNER PUHC,R S Sfp OE, LADEN RUNCT FRDY BONING LIMIER SILT fdCE. DONIS+PUCIrtI_N_PLACF STT FFNrs 1)FENCE POST SHALL BE BE DRI M FEET YAYMI.N ON LINTER; POSTS SHALL BE pNSEN YWIYUU Ho 9ELOW GRADE. FENCE SHALL BE P OMI SAS SHONH, PARALLEL f0 11ff 6RpRID DONTpIRi 1)TRdd SHALL BE E=AVATED AAMMW 6 NCHES DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LWC. J)-w. Nw rAARc (11 GA, B NCI YAK MES, CidNG) SMALL BE STAPLED OR FASTENED SECURELY YRI WE REE to UPSTREAM SOE DENCE T FPOsm W%W WAN FABRIC SMALL EXTEND MIHMUM J6 NCNES ABOVE GRADE 1)MM FABRIC STALL BE FASTENED YCANLLY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF NCMN YNE FABRIC ,,CH NRE TIES SPACED EKRY N INCHES. AT TOP AND MID- SECTION Q FENCE. AmWAUM B WCM FLAP OF FRIER FABRIC SMALL BE PLACED W IREMOH OH UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE, AND BACiCi% EDP 5)NNEH rNC SECTTOVs OF FABRIC AD.IDN EA. OTMER REY SHALL BE OKRLAPPED Br 6 IHOHE5. FOLDED AND STALED. 6)SLT PENCE STALL BE N ECTED MEEKLY, AND AFTER EACH SIG NIFlCANT PRCp TARON EYEHT. .AWIdANCC SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. AND sCpYENT REY0IED WEN 'BULGES, DEVELOP W SILT FENCE. SL,T FENCE M- . , Q• MN 1NNMO1 DONSUItRNP OI�IfLeS UST A[NSfD O,RM M-6IMN 7 ��f►i3��0l�lcer LUMINAME SCHEDULE 9ynaW L.n.i GA' rmiaB MemDor a i+mP PYe ® P1 6 MP22-0-250MH =L MP 22 CYa PIA' GMq Lau, 2D+D Namt CLEAR 250MH HelDO, Type N Det GR025Mg5 ■ P. 6 MP220-MMH ='w� MP 2z TypeVDWWNa, Cl6AR2 WH GRC25MAES P2 ® Ga MP 22. Cba, NI 2 MP22-3.2W- DAL_ �Moui1 CLEAR H Il.0. Type 111 D, GR325M.ES ■ P2— 7 MM-ZL25DMH Ganco NP22CIeer FW CLEAR 250MH M GMs. Laa• 204 M— PRORATED TO 1000 yH Sype MII D... { EHS GR325MS.IES ■ 83e a BRIBDFA470MH � Ir IV CLEAR>DMH B7FM17M.IES STATISTICS Dwaipllpn 1w Nu, Mk M„MMIn AvalMk OrMa3 to ID 203k ODk -A NIA ftnb M. 1.6 ID 42 k u.3 k U'" 601 NO �.. . ��. W •02 'D3 '0.1 'nl 'DI 'D.t '.A 'al 'N '02 '02 'a, 'o.t 'o.l 'D.1 'o.l 'oe 'm 'o.+ 'o., 'a+ •a+ 'az ib 1A iA 1.1 'tl pi 'zA sD b.D ae 'aT 'z1 \�R�f.>�l�lfr�r�e\�1�1I�Q►�►]w[�rl�►�IfR �,�f��nral��tr�, FUo Yew cor r. M• TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) C 0 M L 0 C 0 1° > a U � m C xU) Eo� �0 N` J X 0 Designer AAL Date Jan 7, 2005 Seale V. = 30' Drawing No. 980516ghting40 1 of 1 FR7 O 1) IwIm 1 I U ZUU) CitY of So. Burlington Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 STABILIZATION NOTE INSPECTION NOTE CONSTRUCTION PHASING i FINAL STABILIZATION SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN 48 ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. INSTALL SNOW FENCE, WERE APPLICABLE. TO HOURS OF REACHING FINAL GRADE. AREAS THAT MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE DEMARCATE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. .I WILL NOT BE WORKED FOR A WEEK OR MORE SHALL DIRECTION OF THE ON -SITE PLAN COORDINATOR AT 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG WESTERN SIDE OF BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WITH MULCH. LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR OAK, AND DISTURBANCE (WHERE SHOWN). REMAINING SILT DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE WORKED FOR A MONTH OR MORE SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT NO LATER THAN 24 HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT WHICH GENERATES FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER SLOPES ARE GRADED. AND MULCHED. A DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE J. INSTALL STONE BAG INLET PROTECTION AROUND CONSTRUCTION SITE. CATCH BASIN$ AS SHOWN (AROUND EXISTING ON -SITE PLAN COORDINATOR: ORATES). 4. CLEAR TREES FROM DESIGNATED AREAS I KESSELIDUFF CORPORATION 5. GRADE PARKING AND SLOPE AREAS PER PLAN. 6. UPON COMPLETION OF SLOPE GRADING, INSTALL i BRAD CARTER SILT FENCE WI/ERE SHOWN. STABILIZED SLOPES WITH (802) 862-76M EXT. 13 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME.-___-,- 7. SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 57ABWZATIDN NOTE - -- - -_ -_ ON EROSION CONTROL PLAN. CONTROL COMMENCE WITH PARKING AND DRAINAGE __. AS DRCONSTRUCTION. 8. AS DRNNACE STRUCTURES ARE COMPLETED, f . :::.... ................ IMMEDIATELY INSTALL INLET PR07EC77ON AS SHOWN. __.._ :: .. ..... ................... ^_ ? GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO ..__.. -------------------- BE DEMARCATED WITH SNOWFT9LfE (iYPICAy �• i .................-- 1:-:.::....:....:........_................ -... __...... _max. �:-.------------..... R - Y vw ----------------- i-------------- \IEEE EROTECIIW IM '" ......... .... .... .. ... ..... ........ ... .. .. _ _____________ _...... ... .. _ .._. I ------ --- ---- -- - z---------s------------------------ ` PROPOIS'ED LAN73 CIF DISAAMAIME `'T' ib BE DEMARCA70 WTN 91WY iWW 7 -----------------.......--------- ----------------------- .._:..._..........._.....1......,_,,................__....................,...__._..._._............................_ 4J li' 4' RIPRAP AROUND II PPE INLET (PERMANENT) �r EpLLL (SHADED AREA)ig -, PAQV D � � ' IaEF Prto 11oN .' .S - - 7 -'°i 711= �: LIN 7EC � PH07EC71CN i f l / �- , `i - a STONE B _...._.. T._. REINFORGID 9LT 1 LIMED Nfx7RA7TW FENCE (TYPICAL)— r BWWLE WIN f' RPNAP ' : \ '" �-'` ``, ��' \ , ? �''' •"- j : � � -- ®75 a asnAeBANrr li' \ vTa �j ; _.: ,. 'e -i : !:'^•' \ - ••. _. _.. __ ..-... _ -- ` - m-CCY1dDE MTN EDGE OF E785TW0 LOT ( (NO DdARCATWW REQUAW_ALONO PA1fl:0M . W I it I i ..� .. ..11 .y, i _ t` . \ Y§. Nl1R1H AMT78CAIY ST T \ DQIIetE hIT STRAW BLANKET 4' — HEAYY DUTY J FLANGE INLET FRAME R a ATE WUNAI R-J405B OR LEBARON LF2M-2 WHERE IKET IS NOT LOCATED NEXT CURB. USE A 4 FLANGE FRAME TO A .. r:. GROUT FRAME M 4 INCHES FROM LOP 24- ^� CONCRETE A0.Vs1MENT 3CRW jl',� LADDER RUNGS a 12' O.C. DIAMETER SEE TABLEAl ERFABRMIC WF WTU g i F, SDDREDLAIN REW INTEGRITY d FLEXIBLE RUBBER Boor 4� j. !k - — H BARS, 12' O.C. BO IN WAYS •], L .. •„, • . 1• AS REOLARED ro MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY GRA� FOR SUO-BASE . i�12" '':. IF WEi AND GR UN TABLE j�:..' :..�y: •E•L''".'w'�:. .,y`' �: CLWDIiTONs EXNsr. ----UNDISTURBED saL �1 TYPE -D' CATCH BASIN /r-r MABT FlO� iAYAWO INS DE YAX h'PE aAME]ER K CSP AA n to Tw w 4e• ]a• 24 a a• I- D S DB eo• x2• 4z" s4' x" +B" e• 1t N' e• 1t' T" 1,]B DB 17" 2' N' SPECIFlLAiXXNs: 1/2' EWANSIDWIC TRACnDN .XMNi wM ASPHALT INPRECNAIEU FIBER BOARD FRLER EL£RY SO FEET, SCGREO DIP TOOLED JOINT (I- DEPM OR 1/3 THE MTAL "M OF WALX) wM A APARAIION DISTANCE EOUAL M w WDM DF THE SIDEWAU(. PULL-BREAX OR COW'LETE JOINT VERY 20 FEET. NOTE DISTANCES ARE IYPICU AND MAY BE ALTERED FOR SPECIFlC 9IE CDNOITIONS. CaNC w WEAR COURSE (4000 PSI) %�R_ 0111N�AIIIRMIII NMI LAM B' GRAM BASE [ 4 , TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK IR- -- :t�••: ••fie•. wa•: • es• �y'� : •ece• 0 my • m R �,e •m ; �P, �`i o©o©o® 1. SUBBASE SAND WSIRaM A SUIBaIADE SHOULD BE CCNSIRUCTED AND COYPAc m ro THE offik UWs SHOWN IN ACLONDA wM MDYYONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS( STANDARD A-M. WNENE MORE SwIN¢NT LOCAL GRDINANCES HATE B —TED AELAnw M ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CORSTRUCWN. THEY SHOULD DDVERN. 2. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO Nn YNaWNI DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTIR). 1 IF G NDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT THE ENdNEER ro DISCUSS ADDED MMEASUR6 A/al /^� AS UNDERORUN. I <1 BITUMMUS PAVEMENT m�inFi.. covvATNc TT.awxRs .wc urr at® oTn•ro. L-AWv,M --"-' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 6. ^) CpIGRE1E CURB tir ('LASS B CaN m T REKAL �. I O JR w' �. O= 1 g- I OD Oi MIRAFl SOOX FlLIER FABRIC 1 BANK RUN GROWL CRUSHER RUM p VEL [ , , CURB DETAIL m NMwN1 CRM SLOPE CaPAEB R'� sordwx I y �i II�M CURB FURS FTA SLOPE RAMP / B]S MAN AOIz PA IEMENi J SI ROPE GR L£55 PREFERRED WARMNC TEXTURE 1/2" MAX. RVEAL a• J W SPOPCIIIw 7 TYPICAL DROPPED CURB ,• _ 3• NpIFc. T FoonNc auENsoNs NXPENOENT ON ACTUAL FIXTURE USED. I SEE MANUFACTUREF'S SPECS FOR BDLI PATTERN LAYOUT. J. CONiRACTGR SHALL VEWFY FOOLING AIE MEETS ME APPROPRIA/E CODES FOR HEIaIT OF POLES SHOWN. PI, P2 OR P2/HS, REFER TO 91E PUN FOR MANUFAC --GROUNDING TERMINAL NAND HOLE AND COVER uaNr POLE �GROUNDINC BUSHVNC (1 PCS) ABASE PLATE ` o , LUMINAB[E FOOTGK TANG DK.Nmrs moans FEMOK EXISTIIO CURB SECTIONS AND •` FORAM NEW DROPPED CURB OR NEW FULL NRB � , REMOVE FULL SECDOVS ANp PRONOE a EXPANSION JOINT FlLLER AT NEW ENDS �x 1' RESEAL SAWCUi EXISTING PAVEMENT 12" FROM ENO .XXNT AND FACE OF CURB J" MICN PAKYEMT PATCH 8 ACCESS CURB CUT RECEIVED NEO GRADE . ANCHOR BOLTS PVC COVDWT 18" SONOTUBE EIFCIRICAL BONDING CQVDIICTORS AND CROAVD ELECTRODE PER ART. 230 N.E.C. YaMTWc NEIar IXMT A P1 10' POLE MFW/7 WIN NausN R70re10 � tv PDIE IErwr wm t+• ETNPOSFD /GOTTNO P2Ms m• vDIE' NExNIr wM t4' LMrPosEY :OO17N0 MAY 1 Q 20Q5 �Y of ScaA ®urlin (YWM ONNROENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE S 7LITED.) 1)FENCE —1 SMALL BE wl1 . to FEET YAXWUY ON FILTER FARING. OR WOVEN CENTER. POSTS SHALL BE OBVEN —UN 24" BELOW WE FABRIC sT T-POST GRADE. FENCE STALL BE POSIDOVFD AS 511011N, PARALLEL TO 1 GIRDLING CONTOURS (MAX. 10' O.C.) 14 GAUGE NINE REINFORCING MESH O 6 IT CS 2)TRENCH SHALL BE UGAVATED MN6BIY IT NCNES DEEP GN M^STREAM SIDE OF FENCE ONE. SECURE FABRIC AND WM MIRE DES J)N06EN NRE FABRIC 14 OA., 6 INCH MAX ME511 l XEr FABRIC INro MouNa pw. e•) GROUND OPENING) SHALL BE STAPLED M FASTENED SECURELY WN NNE RI lIPSTREAu SIDE FENCE POSTS, FA NI .CIfNWs WIRE FABRIC SMALL EXEND YNIMW JB NOES ABOVE GRADE. 4)FILTER FABRIC SMALL BE FASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN NNE F—c WN NNPE OES SPACED EVERY 34 NOES. AT TOP AM W- SECTXN OT FENCE. MI NWUY 6 INN FLAP A- FILTER FABRIC SMALL BE PLACED W TRENCH M UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE AND SACXFILLED. 3) WREN TW) gC110M5 OF FABRM ADAN uCH DINER. NEY SNALL 6E OVERIAPPED BY 6 ATHM FOLDED AND STAPLED. 6) SILT fENKE SHALL BE INSPECTED WJ:NLY, AND NNW, 21 HOURS AFTER A SIGRY EVENT NAT AERLTS IN A DISOHARIS LEANNG /NE CMSTRUCRM SIZE. MAIN TENANE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE RERGH WHEN •RLXCES" DEVELOP W NE SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE 1NfTH WIRE MESH REMFORCEMENT n• _ I' _0" I INI.m1 LnLWABVG tNuvmis LAST AEI® 6T—'- q-aua, 8 DESIGN MTERLI BAG S'ELIFICAIIONS APPROXNIAIELY 19 1/2-NON X 2B-RICH POLYPROPYLENE BAGS STONE 1/2-NOt OWISNED STONE HEIGH OF STARE BAGS ABOVE CULVERT INVERTS CONSTRUCT A MINIMAL OF TWO COURSES OF SACS THE STONE-FWLED BADS SHALL BE STACKED TO A NEWT EQUAL TO 1/2 NE DWCTER GR THE CULVERT BEND PROTECTED 4 WINGED HEADWALL B)B.ET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE ON STEEP SLOPES APPLY STEEP N CHANNELS, APPLY NETiNC SHALLOW LAY FROM BOTTOM UP W/ 4" OlE%AP STRIPS OF NfT PARALLEL SLOPE PARALLEL TO TIE ORfCTION TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW OF Flow ROPE IN AT TOP OF SLOPE/BERM A,, AARCHOR PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICA00NS. ON SYHLLOW SLOPES STRIPS (SLOPES GREATER NAR 1:1) OF NE— "Al BE APPLIED FLOW ACROSS RE SLOPE. 41--il (SLOPES UP TO 1: 1) BRING NETTING TO A LEVEL AREA BEFORE NERMNATWC —TA ARN. EERY WHERE HERE IS BERM AT 111E lOP OF THE aOPE ANCHOR AS SHOWN. BRINGTHE NETTNG OVER iNE EERY AND ANCHOR! ITJ.— I BEHWD 111E BERM. � � �� B• — 1 USE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SPE—ED OY NE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, M EQUAL - EROSION CONTROL BLANKET N,ro IAI.OFit LCWWATWND eN•Nmas EDg LP PAVEYENT� I , _.— P TYPE P-204 W RAP FLIER FABRIC WTH Y Ow%.IP J 1/2•-r � 8 � 21-5" BAD( SIR, GRAVQ WASNED STONE 6" PERFORATED UNOERDRAN SLOPE To MAN %51 STONE WaD RYFXTItAMN SWALE Wiml IXR4ATNw OwEDIP LAn ALWSED a D RP -RAN SHALL BE A WELL GRADED ROC( MIXTURE DOWN ro I INCH SIZE PARRILES SUCH THAT SO PERCENT OF NNE NIXIURE BY W 04T SHALL BE LARGER MAN DIE LEAST DWENSM. TYPE SIZE (WOHES) LEAST DWO/SLN P-204 1-5 2 1 -12 4 X 2-J6 12 W J-46 16 V J-50 10 A WELL GRADED R0tl( MIXTURE STALL BE DENIED AS A WXTURE COMPOSED PRWARLY OF W LARDER STONE SIZES BUT WN A SLEFICENT WXTURE M OTHER SIZES TO FILL THE PROGRESSIELY SMALLER VOIOS BETWEEN STONES STONE FOR RIP -RAP SMALL BE APPROVED. ROIOL BROKEN. QUARRY STONE WTH IRREGULAR FACES PER- WTDNG PLAG T IN A BRIT WTERLDOONG YARNER WN NE SMALLER Sro FILLING VOW BETWEEN LARGER SNNES. NE STONES SHALL BE HARD, SOUND, RESISTANT TO WATER ACTION• WEADIERING AND RIIrABLE FOR TILE PURPOSE INTENDED. TEMPORARY SEEDING FMNULA LBS/1000 g NAME SO ANNUAL RYE MASS FINAL SEED"' """''A NAME X BY WEMJHT TALL FESCUE 42 CREEPING RED FESCUE 42 BNDSFOOT TREFOIL B NONE FN& SEEDING FORMULA SHALL SE SPREAD AT A RATE OF 1.1 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET FIRST SPREAD A WNWUY OF 4 INCHES OF TO'SOL OVER ALL GRADED SLOPES THEN APPLY FERTNZER (5-10-5) AT A RATE OF 20 POUNDS PER I,000 SQUARE FIST. OE]'I APPLY LINE AT RATE OF 0 POUNDS PER 1,0o0 SQUARE FEET. BON SEE.YIXMRES SHALL NOT NAK A WEED CONTENT EXCEEDNL 0.40 B BY WOCHT AND SMALL BE FREE OF ALL NOXXXIS WEED SEED, STRAW M MULCH TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF B00 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET M AS ORECTED BY TIE ENGINEER. IS 1/2 N. X 28 IN. W01£N POLYPROPYLENE BAGS. FILL 1/2 - 2/3 FULL WIN 1/2 N. cRUSMED STONE INLET CRATE SWROUND OF ( INLET N E VW DI TWO COURSES M 12-INCH HFJGHT REQUIREMENT Is WAIVED NHERE IT WILL CAUSE a" omAOE IF iNE GS ARE OVERTOPPED NTERBEAW BAG ENDS TO CLOSE GAPS BETWEEN BAGS AND TO SEAL BAGS — IN. YWRYUII 12 3 STONE BAG BYR,ET PROTECTKNV NOT TO SCALE FOR PAVED SURFACES FD • •t^.�9 REPLACE 1OPSM, gID. AND YOCH p G b• tLL }T�TNL(.�� OVERFILL TO AaOW FOR SETRFYENT. -- I`Rfi D ROAD CRATE THOwGtKNLY COEPACTED 43ECEE0 BACITU y u �9a 9 FROM RENOI EXCAVARON. FREE OF STONES r'S! LARGER THAN J" IN &AYETERQwLhw . CO/PACT BA. N 6" LETS STABFIZA110N FABRIC OVflP SAUO (ORAFi 300X SIOEs IREIICH SHEETED M EWAL) pEa OR T S ANDA S. M ROPED ro vOVNA srAIaAROs ..; ,• p• I• STOIWI GRAN DIM ONLY COAPACTED 3/4" CRUSHED STONE REDOING FOR CN^, PVC M IO°E PIPE. 9� o0`B. P � ' ORi: ° UNOISIIMBED SOIL b NOTES ONMAN RNC 1 mull o'O A NgFNLL BE DEWArEREO PRIOR O INsUNc BEDDING HEIM wo 19 DE: LEM ro• SHOWN ON TIE: OETAE XIOICATES THE DIANETER OF 111E PINE OEPN OF S. GRAIN LINES VMY, REFER PLANS FOR DEPN W APPROPRIATE LOCAIXNS TVPIC_AL STORM DRAW TRENCH ,NIaELL DwsA,RN oNuma usr RLW>m nYY0TW1 w-mRN COVER WTH LIFT HOLE (PLAN VEw) ill—��I—�� II-III I- CARSM NDU TRIES NC STRUCTURA, PLASRC GREEN COMA YODEL 1 60-12 BAOKFX.LED STORM TRENCH 4• PVC MR 35 RISER — 4" PVC 5M 35 45• ELBOW 4" PVC SQR .TS IS- wYE • 4" PEW.. PVC 500? JS [-91 WWERDRAW CLEANOM DETAR" m m NOTE AOMTLNS CAN BE MOUNTED CH ANY ANGLE m T NM H-20 I RATED MATE SEE NOTE /✓ BilABN01Us PAVEMENT 12" GRAIN BASIN 1 ' 6• PVC MR JS ADAPTOR r —6" PVC MR J5 OUTLET n 6• GRAVEL M AS ITEQUIRED BY ENGINEER FGR USE WN VARIOUS TYPES OF OUTLETS WN FOR N-20 (HEAVY RAFRC) SITUATIONS WATERi T ADAPTORS SAMFWL MATERIAL SNARL BE CRUSHED SQR-JB SEWF STONE GR GRAVEL MATERIAL YEETND CLASS I M 2 AS S'ECETED W ASTM A-20W CORRUGATED PVC D2J21. BACXFBL MATERIAL SHALL BE ULRA-RIB PVC CORRUGATED POLYET nfNE PLACED UNEORULY IN 12" LIFTS AND COIPACTED. 10 DRAW BASW /2•_,•_D• PUT EN711M IUTRAW LWE INSURANCE CO.- W *C H IS RECORDED IN YAP SEDE 101. 5) DISTANCES ARE ACCURATE TO NEAREST O05' AND ARE SHOWN ro TIIE HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. BEARNCS ARE ACCURATE TO THE NEAREST 10 SECONDS AND ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR 107H"ATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 6) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO Mil Y OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS RIGHTS OF MAY. LEASE LANDS ENCROACNMEN7$ ETC. OBSERVED W THE FlELD OR READILY FOUND N THE LAID RECORDS AOD17WNAL ENCULIBRANCES MAY EXIST W*CH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PUT. 7) MIN MOUNTAIN DMVE WAS CONYEIED TO 7HE CITY OF SOUTH BURLMJOroN IN VOLUME 126 PACE 288. Caaphlc Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 80 N CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ED FOR RECORD A.D. 200_ minutes _ m Page City Clerk ISITY OF VERMONT a JO p. 288 nap slid. 47 LEGEND O RE6AR ( TO 6E SET) O W6 M ( FOUND ) ■ CQVCREiE .MUMDN (f0UN0 ) EaND 0 RCNCF BAR ( FT ) e CAlC1/LATm 1'CYNT ❑ 0MQWTE MDMNIENT ( M W 5ET ) C 'Y SINPIEY YARKER (FOUND ) HYDRANT p_______ 04FRIIEA0 UWTY ONES —IF O" UW FENCE RECEIVED MAY 16 2005 Boun"cM. B t0 0„,,,,WS—b,, "051 -, 1 OF V SD00TT lDX SYSTEMS CORP. Ing DAB D Y SOT TAYLOR �* �e *6, 35 Green Mountain Drive ps. n/n/w key 1'-20' South Burlington, Vt. Wat �r TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) "''d 5,* 226 51 478 BWk Fdk Wed F. 0. Mea NO WWWbW V—* 0e493 002) e794351 ___ S N111 MEADOWOOO ENTERPRISES, LPA TGE POINT 39 EL 21147 � • r ) 1 1 1 Y r 1 / f KK 1 r9� ti. _ \ _,16 _.-.- PAVED PARKING AREA O O � ` TE PAD - CONGIETE PAD _ I r \\ METAL 1 t STIR t. ,t i PAVED PAIMONG AREA i r— i g 1 1 GO 1 JJ ♦, 1 - ---CONCRETE WAtX - - - l CONCRETE STAIRS .._._�-.- WALK` '. 4d`CONCRETE \ v AND CURB SIOEwAIK \'B.t, PAVED PARKING AREA ` NOTE w/1 1. THE LOCA77ON OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/OBSTRUCTIONS ARE SHOWN IN NIP REAL ESTATE AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE CORP. OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES/OBSTRUCTIONS WHEIHLR OR NOT SHOWN. 2 THE SITE PLAN IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY AND A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY TRUDELL 0, / CONSULTING ENGINEERS, (TOE) EN7771-ED -BOUNDARY PLAT, IDX SYSTEMS CORP., 35 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT.' DATED NOV. 2A 2OD4. \ TOE POINT 36 \ EL 221.13 i l 1 It i 1 \ 40 { { { i i { 15' PEDESTRIAN EASELIENT { i\ � � - !,U:rr--.. 1\ I \ . l I N DX SYSTEM$ CORP. 1 WALK _ O I 1 TCE Pawl ]B EL 212.82 =_I T-\ / e' AC WA 7ER MAN >9W"?• -�— -� T.------------------------------ POINT JS 8 CARP 6' CARP EL. 20224 I 201.00 - II>•19d0 8 N (2) B' AC SEWER MAIN GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 'd-197.0 12 S-------------- Ih197.0 out i _____________J W / � ; s --------------- �___-______ _ _ Ti SMM �} i i f2' % J8' EASEMENT -200.61 yr i � lZ9Bi1`., i h196.91 h,%.81 18 out I-----------------1C --------------- G --------------------- O--------------------- -- - r�199.08 1-194.78 kn 1-194.68 out 1 R i l\ i 1 1 I r I LEGEND SEWER MAINS E1(LSTM AND SERVICES WATER MAINS AND SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE ____-______e_____-____ UOUID PROPANE OR NATURAL GAS --------- --p__________ OVERHEAD POWER ---------- (IMP --------- UNDERGROUND POWER ----------- --------- OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ---------- art___ ------ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE -------- ___IIT___------ CABLE TELEVISION ---------- —__------_ TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS _----_rn-----. PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE EASEMENTS WEILAND LIMIT FENCE , SEWER MANHOLE (SMH) 0 CATCH BASIN (CB) ❑ VALVE w CURB STOP (CS) • FIRE HYDRANT (HID) l} UTILITY POLE 4 MTC OR El BOLLARD LIGHT SIGN 0 TCE CONTROL POINT STEEL REBAR Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 20 40 60 BO 117r— TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478 61mir Pak BDWd P.O. Bat 308 MM M-031 Wtrare) WYNa4 Vemmtrt OSB95 00718744)WO nd VW U. m the VV& M: w TriaddCn ft— cONvrruAL ATntovu stalMs>aoN A7LMNAXY A OVAL Aal69p/ ACT 150 9aM690N KNAL A CNAL AdMQ90N WNST9lICIKIN DIAV NGS M e�.vetae mrerwt�im� a�x.., �xue, 4•wo�9 wmun�irx• �r .we xi.�e.a > roa a..xa > .oewota u•rro. rss.e w mnl� •m� tee. w�i�wsweM.e�a � akM ,m� � d � �e �. a•.xp b �rx•�oM Tv��okt m �. saM• tTM dwnu..�' a w.a..a Sxd Aw+•w '. � �r �.et. woi. as i•m yp-•w. hla Dac�L1uL o.B By 7637 aNL project Tme IDX SYSTEM!S CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Dr. South Burlington, Vt. Sheet Tide Existing Conditions D—ft himber• 98D5,-100 E.6—lott: I P-0d --wer : DAB DTawtL : RMP Date : 12 2J 2— _ F.B. D SCJk : I" - 2D' Rged Nlerarre: xxx )14W: xxx Bend, FBe : xxx Appwed ECI N MEADOWOOO ENTERPRISES, LPA TCE POINT 39 { 1 EL. 219.47 I as---- - �_ I. GY�G EASEMF.HF.-,.-- ape......—_f`_._ ` — — 21 `-------- -am._-- - / _ Aim----— -'-._. . - -- _ _-d189FytM.._ �f 8- AC WATER - _ -- - __ ... ,a,�`_- -__ W---w--___-____>.�.�„-k:.-_--___.-_-_-....sW.-• .._ -_ d,P - _ppr------------ -s •--_ - I-zoz.5e- 6' Cp1P ------- ;-Igaw -----'-- -------- a" cup 1- 9B88 - A EL POINT J5 1-120 9IL 00 1-t9878 out EL 20224 iT-1%D 6 N (2) '�-----� �h/97.0 13out b -• I s -- - -- 5------------ Ih/7.0 9S ------------ ■ ------------- •-------------J a -------------- - '`---------- x----------- --- - s,_,1- 7 ', lz' X 38' EAsfAIENr GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE I 1 I i-I%.9I xi _------------- i-I%.8I iB aut - t____________________ _______________ C _____________________ G ---- _________________ G._________-_________----------- - i \ 799.08 41 � 1 1 � i rpm N/F UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT N/F CUP REAL ESTATE CORP. S14a4'04•W — o - - _ — _-------------------+ f TCE PDINr 3e PAVED PARKING AREA TC BE fT-nowD CONCRETE ' .� pr D-- I ' 5pm6RETE PAD .[ryVA I HVAi !�j I S NVAC i . 1hY,6.04 I r � f i I I ' _ 1 i ------I ! Tow RF3 w-O i ! PAM PAMM AIR i iD 8E REMOVED . i i a Ce WAIX Tx7NfFE}E N141X 4 -- { `KI 8 Y'\- ` CONCRRE 9 SIDEWALK `+C. TPQA � t>iM AREAj\ AND LEGEND E7(TS7V4G WATER MAINS .........._munXIN -- AND SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE UOUIO PROPANE OR NATURAL CAS p ........._...._....._. .. p.._...._._.__...... OVERHEAD POWER au^ --------- ---- —___- UNDER[ROUND POWER V —____-_�.__-_-.___ OVERHEAD TE/EPH E Mr _--__—pxr•_--___ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE Ur CABLE TELEVISION TOPOGRAPHIC 1a CONTOURS PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE EASEMENTS — FENCE x CATCH BASIN (CB) VALVE w e4 am STOP (CS) r FIRE HYDRANT (HYD) UTILITY POLE t -0 TRANS C� BOLLARD LIGHT SIGH 4 4 OTOE CONTROL POINT STEEL REBAR TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (I•CE) 478 8Mt P4tk Pod P.O. Box 300 M= 979b331W—) wmbb.I, Val A 05495 OM 67400E005od VYIt W m 8m W.b at W W W.T.WacnwMhw.t>aR wNvr,vAL w,xovAt IaeALs90N 14LuaMnAtr wmLovAL suaMn9oH ACT I" AlMLS90H Ir4AL ARAOVAL SURAIM90rt COr6TlIKTgN OBAW04GS t. p• nw-b m- �..w.t� v. nt.:e.e m w.e n m+l� M .ro: wnboct y mmArn .al 4.iMA otl� a 1Mtn e� � IFS H � EbcowM 1My�u.�lo M Y a� w s.w �ir.�t� were. �we.w str �'a�'�Pr•e . .eae. ea wro mew. IV9. nsapum Orb y Ne9Ylatta y~'.O'0a 4 * Np,ON637'1 * _ 111111110 IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont Demolition Plan DraWYTg Nlanbs • 98051-10, E1OdYl9n t 6 P 1- a —SW - DAB DTaWet t SIT Date: 1-03-2005 F.S. 206 Spalet ,' - 20' Pr.j.d Mini" : xxX X41dt 98051d.35 8o1d1 Far: xxx Graphic Scale Feet 20 0 _ 20 40 60 80 SP2 R wM SDL FILL EMBANKMENT EROS ON CONTROL BLANKET SEED AND MULCH IN ACCORDANCE wM SPECIFICATIONS ANWOR wM SOI CONSTRUCTION S CtFICATIDNS FOR SLOPE STABILIZATION EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE MANUFACIIIRED CURLED WIXXT ExCELSIW FIBERS. OR AONIC/LTURAL STRAW. ME BLANKET SHALL BE COWRED wM A PHOTODEGRADABLE EKTRUDED PLASRC MESH. ME BLANKETS SHALL BE NRNISHED IN ROLLS MIDI SHALL BE EWAL M EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS MANUFACTURED BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR OR BE NORM AMERICAN GREEN. 2. EROSION CONTRA. BLANKETS OF MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL RECRADED SLOPES AS DESICNA TED ON ME SITE PLAN. J. AF7ER SLOPES HAZE BEEN GRADED REASONABLY CLOSE TO FINAL GRADES LINE, FERTILIZER. AND TOPSOIL HAW BEEN COMPLETED, ME EROSION CONT G BLANKET SHALL BE LAPPED 8 WONES AT ME SEAMS AND ANCHOREO AT THE TOE AND TOP OF SLOPES. BURY ME BLANKET 6 INCHES DEEP AT THE TOE OF SLOPE. AND COVER wM TOPSOIL. STAKE ON STAPLE THE BLANKETS AT 4 FEET ON CENTER ROM WAYS OVER THE ENTIRE SLOPE. 9 SLOPE STABUZATIO C D E BIIUNINWS PAVEMENT 6• 1 "R��'� CONCRETE CURB CLASS B CONCRETE T' REWAL 1 3' m 8 o Co o o8D 0 0 NIRM SDOx FILTER FABRIC BANK RUN GRAM. CRUSHER RUN CRAWL 2 CURB DETAIL -r N I•LAST — w:ANwG COURSE (TYPE No (VAOT 406) - eASE COURSE (TYPE 11) (VAOT —) ^CRUSHED GRAN_ (VAOT 704.05) GRAM_ BASE (VAOT TOt.d) INRM ATIO SN COORDN FABRIC WSTALLAIKW W ALIZABONCE wM i GY4 Jf1' -A ACTTARER•S RECOIMIENDAINXI4 �-6" SANO BORROW AND WSINON M BE USED W POORLY GRAN SOUS ON DINER BEDROCK (VAOT 70 TOJ.OJ) —11I IJ I I I-1 I I 11=I I I I IJ I I I I-1 _u=1 CX0 LLLLIBONAM ON 000000 ©0000 CONSTRIICIED AND =AC1ED ILA NNE DMLENSIWS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE wM WRMONT AGENCY OF MANSPOtTADON SPECIFICATION£ STANDARD A-M. WHERE MORE SMINCENT LOCAL ORDINANCES HAW BEEN ADOPTED RELARW TV ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CON47RUCIIOI, TREY SNCRD GOVERN. 2. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE NAIERIALS TO ISx MAXIMUM DEHSTY (STANDARD PROCTOR). 3. E MRQINDWAIER OR SOT SPQR ARE ENCOUVTERED CONTACT ME EWNEER TO DISMISS ADDED MEASURES SUG1 AS UNDERORNN. - - 4. EXTEND GRAVEL SUBBASE MATERIAL12 1NONES BEYOND EDGE OF PAWMENT. S PAVEMENT mt nrNe Twc FWWN[ws We LAST IEM4tD 02AN�bF l-RAtIIY 1. i'Do Nc DIMENSIONS DEPENDENT ON ACTUAL FIXTURE USED. 2 SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS FOR BOLT PATTERN LAYWT. 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL "" FOOTING SIZE MEETS THE APPROPRIATE CODES FOR HOGHT OF POLES SHOWN. GROUNDING TERMINAL -"'HAND HOLE AND COWR --LIGHT POLE —GROUNDING BUSHING (2 PCs) —BASE PLATE HED GRAM ANCHOR BOLTS PK CONOOT PW SONb 15' SONOTDBE ELECIFICAL BONDING CONDUCTORS AND GROUND ELECTRODE PER ART. 2W N.EC 3 LUMWAM FOOTING PI OR P2/)M REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR MANUFACTLRERS DETAILS L51 3" SOLARE STEEL POLE VANES AO' V t�,�Tt •^ G,I, BRONSE FINISH NLP" r�0�' BRONZE \ T uucE sTm D Ey \ 0 A A 7ya BRABB F AREAS 4" 4 ::'`� II III III �PAND 24 AAWAR V=< � I IIIIII—III �'• I I —I I —I 1 1- =1 1=I 1=1 —III—III-1 PANT EXPOSED FW71MG YELLOW I IIII=1 � 1= `E Dx SEE LUMINARE FOOTING DETAIL 6 TYPICAL LUMINAIRE o,ror NOTES• STAKE ONLY N EXTREMELY �W wNDY CONDITIONS JA\ • IF KNOW PLANT DKN m- W BARKED TREES wM (� OE SAME SIIN LQ OPoEP MN Gt G/L MAP wM wtlTE � POLYPROPYLENE NRM LOOSE LOOSEN. WT, M REMOVE N NATURAL BURLAP FROM � NCO � � W�� 70P 1/3 OF ROOT BALL Ql RE'NOW SYNBE BURLAP I GW1 ""�T1J •LBRE BASKETS: (.Ow WT AWAY BOTTOM RINGS. PARTIALLY BACKFILL MEN REMOW REMmNwc WIRE. TRUNK FLARE AND TOP OF RWi BALL SHQILD BE AT GRAM w DUEL. ORANED SOL Y LAYER SHREDDED BANK MULCH (T) BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCIMCT) OWR PERMEABLE wS0 FABRIC. DD NOT PLACE 6" CLEARANCE NEYi TD TREE TRUNK 3" SAUCER RIM 'IJII II I I� F -�11I II=1I I� I17i ROromL EMS NO SOIL IF SO OEPM ON BALL IF SOIL IS ? CRAWL CLAY ON CRAWL PLANT PIT wOM ORGANICCORPOMAT -- JX BALL OVA. ORGANIC MANORIAL 9 TREE PLANTING DETAIL (WELL TO MODERATELY DRAINED SOIL) 1004 IRUDOL C0Vl1lIYl0 DNWrrms LAST MYISTD wnN/as L-IRW24 LIGHT NWNIWG HEWY/i A PI 20' POLE HEKSIT wM WISH FOOIWG P2VN4 20' POLE HENRHi wM 24" EXPOSED FOOTING RIP -RAP SHALL BE A WELL GRADED ROC( MIXTURE DOWN M I INCH SIZE PARTICLES SUCH THAT SO PERCENT OF ME MIXTURE BY WEIGHT SHALL BE LARGER MAN DE LEAST DIMENSION. TYPE 92E (INCHES) LEAST d.EN— P-204 1-5 2 1-12 4 N 2-W 12 HI J-4B 6 ON 3-50 20 A WELL GRADED ROW MIXTURE SHALL SE DEFINED AS A MIXTURE COMPOSED PRIMARILY ON THE LARGER STONE SIZES BUT wM A SLIMCIENT MIXTURE OF OMER SIZES TO FILL ME PROGRESSWLY SMALLER KIDS BETWEEN STONES STONE FCR RIP -RAP SHALL BE APPROVED, ROUGH. BROKEN, QUARRY STONE RIM IRREGULAR FACES PER- MITTING PLACEMENT IN A TIdIT WIERLOCKNC MANNER wM MF SMALLER STONES FILLING VODS BETWEEN LARGER STONES. THE STOVES SHALL BE NAND. SOLNO, RESISTANT TO WATER ACTION, WAMERINC, AND SOTABLE FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. RM NOTES DET-SCALE TRUDOL rxWlAtWv ollavmis usr xWsm A.A. E-xsNN.s OR ED 21' NIIINUM. JO' R SPACE ALLOWS LMRM SOOX TYPICAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I KNtlOI DxINA1wC plwlFplS lA4I AFIIsm roNWAN A-mIY RECe,VE® MAY 16 2005 CKY of So. g,,nitgton TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ME) 478lINk MRDtl PRIMMAN C.OwQlNAL AElMOVAL AlM690N ANY AHIOV/1L lIM�90N AR 2B0 b1lIYI90N fx4Ai. APfMOM/11. A�M690w CONfiR11CIlON p1AYIgC6 a �elwt�im .N�in ms �ernma s. nt.�e.e /s MMmo'r W.'.xP IM x Mws � v m ••NictM �bwxq� 2 De.xP pyo.e b aon.wcxm an xbM.e Io M Ira x ��t d e�ia b M%Wr�wer6w� 1d�ilMKm� µ �en e,�,4nt b nrew IarMw D�Nx..,. (TrA) Ma.� ue1p N a% Mw ermNp b emMrucfbn el Nw, Pn}ct bw O.n•r iyr�nb Mot (M% ) Na• nMnN. rpvwA me aagbd w eo.xR. 1M bo•N,w •nw M m�Nls�ve 'Ow ppow 4uerntslm' ann Wr t+�'+.Lob me Imol �pprow. A. x.bum.�b oI r.N. Ww• erwxp• Ora neP1� M..oY D..�. •.o•..WWr t..,.,,. MM mPr mx. M. rw. n..I sy IOeWWMxr } No. QNL37 I*� rrr/�l/�111 IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont Sheet1114 Details DEMwYIg NuYlbc: 9805T-1oJ E:DeWMn• s AaJeM.Y mwLMgC: DAB wwWRLi 5NT DIOBS 1/10/200 SCAM i SHOWN DI BOP REALTY ASSOCIATE v. 297 p. 623 PLAZA INVESTMENTS v. 272 p.218 �:ise p.e.s� U.S. ROUTE 7 SHELBURNE ROAD Graphic Sole Feet 60 O 60 120 ISO 240 N PARTNERSHIP 214 p. 451 f05 p. 21 F WAY E5 LLSON PARTNERSHIP v. 194 p. 330 mb. 105 p. 21 s Unu TY cNT 123 MENT TO P.C. P. 90 a+ANOE NAM[ UPDATE „/R2/bt WT ADD PROPOSED ROAD t NOTE 7 f2/OB/09 SMi LOT OONSO"OATION 01/," DAB VVYOM DRrPlprlon Wa BY O �I�VJG\.1 LV�..AIIVIr THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWNG 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS 2) CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSES CONDUCTED WIN A TOTAL STATION ON 7/20/98 AND 11124198. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN ALONG A LEG OF THE TRAVERSE 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS WTH ALUMINUM CAPS 4) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE LANDS ENCROACHMENTS ETC. OBSERVED W THE FIELD OR READILY FOLD IN THE LAND RECORDS ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WIIC H ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 5) THIS PARCEL MAY BE SUBXCT TO SPRING RIGHTS AS DESCRIBED W VOLUME 11, PAGE 431. 6) THE 70' WDE RIGHT OF WAY WAS ORIGINALLY SHONN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK fO5, PAGE 21. THE CITY, ADJOINING LAND OWNERS AND OTHERS MAY HAVE RIGHTS OVER THIS STRIP. 7) IDX DRIVE WAS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN THE FOLLOWNG DEEDS 1) FROM BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES RECORDED W VOLUME 615 PACE 48. 2) FROM DENNIS BLODGETT AND GERALD MILOT RECORDED NI VOLUME 275 PAGE 103 AND 3) FROM BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES RECORDED IN VOLUME 477 PAGE 398. GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE WAS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 9I VOLUME 126 PAGE 289. 8) THIS PARCEL WAS CONVEYED TO IDX SYSTEMS CORP. IN VOLUME 501 PAGE 513 AND VOLUME 501 PAGE 518. LEGEND 0 ROW I TO a SET ) • PraN PFE 1 Fan10 ) CONG X MOIR/MENT O w Y YARKm (FWND ) 0 LALLUU IED Pawl ❑ CaVO' W MOWD"ENT ( TO 6E SET ) ----5---- SANITARY SE1Rlt -------- 0 ------ STRO"" OR— '------- P ----- o1EFNEAO UwTY LILS SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CLERKS OFFICE RECEIVED FOR RECORD D. 19 at Wdock mtrwtm m and rocardBd in Vdu Page Attest city cl" PN"0e" BB. of IDX SYSTEMS CORP. "°""" m 98051-" 1iL ' � WOTT y 0. Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, Vt. Pralrt•p. DAB •,4Nm wT TAYLOR NO. 4BB * t4nR" tlW BoundaryPlat •w 2/15/98 sews (IP TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Md BPPt 166 Ilk "S98 51 47• 06W Poi Bad P. 0. Sm NO W WPOun V-09 MIS 0" 87"Ut t MAY 10 2005 City of So. Burlington Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 U Tiff: -IIL#7 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN THE PUNT SCHEDULE SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI W ACCORDANCE MTN 260.1 STANDARDS FOR MEASUREMENT OF NURSERY STOCK. 2 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS FROM DATE OF RECENT OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPLETED WSTALLADON BY THE OWNER. 1 REPLACEMENT PLANTNGS WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE MISSWC, NOT TRUE TO SPECIFICATIONS, HAVE TO INSTALLATION. DIED OR ARE UNHEALTHY OR UNCHARACTERISTIC OF THE SPECIES (DUE TO EXCESSIVE PRUNING. DIEBACK OR OTHER REASONS). 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCRTECTS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPORTING ANY DISCREPANCIES AND RECEIVE WRITTEN INSTRUCTION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PRECEDING. 6. ALL SHRUBS AND TREES WILL BE SPRAYED MTN 714E ANT-DESICCANT-WLT-PRLR' OR APPROVED EQUAL) PRIOR TO THE FIRST WINTER OVER SEASON (LE. NO LAYER THAN NOVEMBER JO). 7. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR LOCATE ALL UNDER UTILITIES IN AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED PRIOR TO COMYENCNG ANY EXCAVATION. ADJUSTMENTS TO TREE LOCATIONS WILL BE ALLOWED WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS ARE CLEARLY A PROBLEM AND WITH PRIOR SITE APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6 ALL PLANT BED, SHRUB AND TREE LOCATION SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANT BEDS SHALL BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10. G04ERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ERO90N CONTROL MEASURES DIMING CONSTRUCTION. II. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE TOPSOIIID AND SEEDED. 12 MULCH SHALL CONSIST OF DOUBLE -SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL AND CON ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SAMPLES OF MULCH TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. MULCH PUNT MATERIALS AS SHONN ON PLAN AND DETAILS. 11 IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS CONTRACT TO AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING TREES OR SHRUBS ON SITE OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR TRANSPLANT OR REMOVAL 14. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR TREES DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION SHALL BE SSW PER CALIPER INCH. SHA LL ALL BE •M ,OR EACH. 15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO HIS OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE CONTRACT LIMIT LINE 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW WORK SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING GRADES AT CONTRACT LIMIT LINE AND/OR LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION UNE. 17. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT SUBGRADE5 ARE 4 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO SPREADING LOAM FOR SEEDED AREAS IB PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT ON ANY CONSTRUCTION, ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL RECEIVE: TREE PROTECTION FENCE O OUTER EDGE OF DRIPONE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 19. LICIT FIXTURE LOCATIONS MAY BE FIELD AD.ASTED WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL —11" =Y`=0wi11fY"• • IF KNOMT PLANT TIN m- 'W BARKED TREES WITH TIE SAME SLW ORIENTATION OR �//L�y MNAP WITH WHITE P0.YPRDPKQL WRAP 0 'BU/KM: LOOSCI, MT. a REMOVE W �W LX W� NATUQK BURLAP FRCA TOP In OF ROOT BALL Jp �,,Q� REMOVE SR4TETC IBURLAP 0TRW OWE -MAE BASKETS CUT AWAY BOTTOM RWCS PARTIALLY SACKFILL THEN REMOVE AMA." WRE RUNT( FLARE ME) TOP O ROOT BALL S40 XD BE Ar GRADE N MET, ORAIED SOL /� ]' LATER 9REDOED BARK APPROVED DMUCT PEFAPE ARCHITECT) OVER M® FABRIC DQ uOT PLACE 6' CLEARANCE NEXT TO TREE TRUNK ]' SAUCER AM I i To DEPTH EOFBAL SCA ro DEPTH Kr ..., SOIy CLAY6PA RAVEL AIELY CLAY OR CRAKE PLAIT PIT NDTH WCdiPdiAIE 3X BALL OA ORGAAIC MATERIAL TREE PLANnM DETAIL (WELL TO MODERATELY DRAINED SOIL) Pot MMAWu CO1iaTWn nMMm4 IASI R[1HD WHIM t-nlmt9 � �9 �� ARGY-�BARX-G` IECI)APPROT£D BY LANDSCAPE A DSPERIIEEO W FABRIC,RC CLBLE TOBO NOT AOSEB 'b m YAN STEM. TVs � r ]' SAUCER PoY RANT PIT MDTH JX BALL OIL ROIDTILL EXISTING SOW TO DEPTH OF BALL NOTES PLANT SHIMS AT SAYE DEPTH AT MWCI SHIK.B HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN 1OOSETN. W T, a REMOVE BURLAP mom TOP 1/3 O ROOT BALL � BALM MULCH AID REED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CON- TINODNS WHEN USED IN BEDS 2 BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB x�mt HnaMA1Nc oNWRms L-naaa� NO EXIPLANT MATERIAL FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAGNER, SHEET LS.I DATED FEBRUARY 2003. PROPOSED RANT MATERIAL AND GENERAL NOTES FROM A PLAN BY 714E OFFICE OF KEITH WAGNER SHEET LI LAST REVISED 1/21/2000. OEXISTING TREE C',&o f /,o OPROPOSED TREE v G�� PLANTMG lPIODULE 'I AfYRLgAflON LIOTAXIM NAME OOMYOM MAl1g OWN2E7Y Sim OduRON AC AMELANC HER GRANDIFLORIA ROBIN HILL ROBIN HILL SERNCEBERRY 27 1 1/2- - 1 /3/4- B e A SMESE STEM CT OEDIT9A TRIACARTHCS MPEMAL MPEMAL HONEILOCUST 13 2 1/1' - J' B e B PN RNUS NIGRA AUSTRIAN PINE 4 6' - 7. B e B Graphic Scale Feet 30 O 30 60 90 120 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL N THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZBDI STANDARDS FOR MEASUREMENT OF NURSERY STOCK. 2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS FROM DATE OF RECEIPT OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE COMPLETED INSTALLATION BY THE OWNER. 1 REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS WILL BE REWIRED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE MISSING, NOT TRUE TO SPECBICATKINS, HAVE TO INSTALLATION. DIED OR ARE UNHEALTHY OR UNCHARACTERISDC OF THE SPECIES (DUE TO EXCESSIVE PRUNING, DIEBACK OR OTHER REASONS). 4. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPORTING ANY DISCREPANCIES AND RECEIVE WRITTEN INSTRUCTION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PRECEDING 6. ALL SHRUBS AND TREES BILL BE SPRAYED WIN THE AND -DESICCANT 'WILT-PRUF' OR APPROVED EQUAL) PRIOR TO THE FIRST WNTER OVER SEASON (I.E. NO "TER THAN NOVEMBER 30). 7. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES N AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY EXCAVATION. ADJUSTMENTS TO TREE LOCATIONS WILL BE ALLOWED WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS ARE CLEARLY A PROBLEM AND NTH PRIOR SITE APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. e. ALL PLANT BED, SHRUB AND TREE LOCATION SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANT BEDS SHALL BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT10. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. I1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE TOPSOIiD AND SEEDED. 12, MULCH SHALL CONSIST OF DOUBLE -SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OR APPROVED EQUAL AND CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SAMPLES OF MULCH TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MULCH PUNT MATERIALS AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND DETAILS 13. IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS CONTRACT TO AVOID ANY DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING TREES OR SHRUBS ON SITE OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR TRANSPLANT OR REMOVAL. 14. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR TREES DAMAGED BY CONSTRI/CBON OPERATION SHALL BE S500 PER CALIPER NCH. SHRUBS SHALL BE $100 EACH. 15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO HIS OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE CONTRACT LIMIT LINE 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW WORK SMOOTHLY WM EXISTING GRADES AT CONTRACT LNIT LINE AND/OR LAST OF CONSTRUCTION LINE. IZ CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT SUBGRADES ARE 4 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE PRIOR TO SPREADING LOAM FOR SEEDED AREAS. IB. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION, ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL RECEIVE: TREE PROTEC17ON FENCE O OUTER EDGE OF DRIPLINE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 19. LIGHT FIXTURE LOCATIONS MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED NTH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL HOTS:• =TAKE o.LY N �INLYLLY WNOY COtlI1NXIS • E KNGWi. PLANT THN BARKED TREES WIN NE SAME SUN @ ORENTA TION CR WRAP Wm WBTE POLYPROPYLENE WUP LOOSEN CUT, r REMOVE D.1 ��W NATURAL BURP iBAL EDP I/J OF ROOT BALL REMOVE SININEIIC BI/RIAP WT AWAY BOTTOM RMS. PARTIALLY BACKFX THEN REMOVE REWWBVG NAE. TWUIi FLARE AND TOP OF ROOT BALL SNOAD BE AT GRADE N WELL ORNIED SOW.. 3, SNEED BARK MACH (T "'ER BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE B ARCBTEC 01EA (EAIIEABL£ F 6' CLEARANCE BEET) ro IRE£ WpWEAT p A- SAUCER RW �_III�I CIIi �I TO DEP EOF BALL. F ro OEPM tx BALL E SOIL IS PMYORGRALE MAVENA CLAY L _ PLANT flT WQTH NC09WOtA TE JX BALL DOA. ORGANIC MATERIAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL (WELL TO MODERATELY DRAINED SOIL) lir i rMIOELL GON9LIIIG [NaNLDis _ usr iEWsa a/IWAn - PHASE II PLANTING 4u 1 J' LAYER SNRK IM iEDOEO BMW E � � ��11��.. (ro rE APPROVED Br LANoscAPE ARCHTECT) OVER PERM1EWBf NEED q, "W FAIS OU NOT PLALE GOY TO MAIN S1EM. J" SWOT RIM ROTOBLL EXwlVG SOL TO DEPTH OF BALL PLANT PIT WIDTH JX NOTES: BALL Dtt •PLANT SINWO AT SAME DEPTH AT MIIW 9NLLB NAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN •LOOSEN, CUT, ! REMOW BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 aF ROOT BALL • ,RELIDED BARK —CH AND NEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CON- TINUOUS WEN USED N BEDS 2 BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAGNER, SHEET LS.i DATED FEBRUARY 2003. GENERAL NOTES FROM A PLAN BY THE OFFICE OF KEITH WAGNER SHEET LI LAST REVISED 1121/2000. PROPOSED PUNT MATERIAL FROM KAREN PETTERSEN, TCE. 0 EXISTING TREE OPROPOSED TREE Graphk Scale- 30 0 30 60 90 120 PLANTBVG SCHEDULE ABBREWIAIION BOTAEOCAL WAME COMMON WAME OUAIRIIY S= CONDMON AF ACER X FREEMAMI 'AUTUMN BLAZE' AUTUMN BLAZE FREEMAN MAPLE 4 2 1/2' - J" B a B FO FORSYTHIA OVATA EARLY FORSYMIA 54 J CAL CON) GT GAEOITSIA TRACAN/NOS WPM. WPERIAL NONEnOCUST 2 2 1/2" - J" B a B YC MALUS CORALBURST CORALBURST CRABAPPLE 10 4' - 5. B a B, HEAVY PN PMUS MORA AUSTRIAN PWE 12 6' - 7 B a B OP QUERWS PALUsm PN GAK IJ 2 1/2' - T B a B UAP ULMUS AMER/CANA PRINETON PRNCETCN AMERICAN ELM J 2 1/2" - J" B a B 0 X m n m m 0 V a 40 IDX Drive South Burlington VT 01/10/2005 1'-30' r y, R"90N& ,_CITY PREL WARY APPROVAL �/~05 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS = flo _ = i n "=,% s ' .. _ " ,• D- B: Slrr CHECKED 8: DAB A oil SITE PLAN — PHASE 111 P—R WATER VALVES CB T07 217.97Eali 4 . 08FENCE WATER LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC r EXISTING 6' A.C. & TELEPHONE ) WATER MAIN STUB ..-----gNER $1t,B --��ix1�CONCRETE CURB- CB15.44��,�___�-�ANT 6' Of CLASS l N ENO OF PAVEMENT 1-211.53 32 WATER MAIN `; `SEWERR , SEWER MH� CURB WATER CB ut SEWER MH (/ Ce /-2,B.B4 CUT 8- A.C. SEWENUAIN _ VALVE _ _ 5211.1J �r-211.14 MH Y r-z1870 f-209.60 CO� pus cuRe GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE GAS 13; PVC 4' PVC UNDERDRAIN Cto 52.WA G MAW -- _ .. ___A __________ ______ _______ W - S tl J______ W SD 3' CONCRETE SIDEWA[X Co 0i t 15t7h-2f0.J2 15' PVC SOR 35 STORM DRAIN-211.09 / „n t 4' h-271.77 HYDRANT TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ® J STORM YH out-210.13 OVERHEAD n y VAULT t TRANSFORMER EXISTING WELL 1-207.1211.23 POWER 1 •m UNDERDRAIN IS' ABANDONED DRAW PfPE 12' PVC AND CONCRETE HEADWALL 18&4J ®�""'---EXISTING WELL HYDRANT Ion-184.56 r=18B/3 3 - _ UO I out-184.45 J h-184.7J �09SEWER f94.2B ' I I out-f84.13 1 IT' h=18196 m 204.24 N/O 1 12' out-182.27 1-197.60 \ J CB CONCRETE < \ R-186.04 CURB SO �1 P TELEPHONE ce19104 ,\ INC PC YPAR�D DRAW Ce \ h 187.74 uNi w h190. 4 r-1928J //f 1-f8843 \ W ~ uce q , / 19.78 12-HOPE A 1 h6--/7150 a o LUI6NAIRE \ f5- PVC fin -171f3 MH 13-PVC (TYPICAL) /out-17J.11 15', PVC \ ,�d UP CB - -CURB CONCRETE PADS SEWER- r-185" n.IB6.IB \ GENERATOR PAD MH 1 12' h=19.77 I h9991.8t �i h ' co LL 190 'II \\ '�Br PJO Ce �74,86 112' h-19.68 I out=f92.58 u 199. 77 N t-185.9 41P -178.981 le- An-' Q /-19297 Cs i1• i h-17189 CB i out=17D41 $ m r-1 T. 1 \ 1 r-182.78 - I out-17402 ra 1Bf.J5 \ COOLING 6- PVC �' !' PVC 1- 171.35 CB d \ - -- ..._ .O 4' PVC C.O. - 185.65 i i 92 V1 \ \ TONER R ' SD 180.t9 ra186.l6 CONCRETE .� \ i-182.48 8' �' H E SD 5 2- 'Dfr SO 6' H. -TELEPHONE SIDEWALK 1250P�� \ 45l.EEVF \ \ E P SO 1811J �19.97 6' PVC WATER VALVES 9- vt =-' MANHOLE (a -GENERATOR ht 9.IJ 1-176.00 .... 5 Q• -. 8' O CLASS 52 SEWER, N SEWER MH mg' 4 .9� P CB ---; -! f ( i iW I wA1fyN 4A+N i I S -1734T d • / 1 1 r=iBz.82 C8 Co r-182.8J ! I=I7J.55 ELECTRICAL - :.� i % - "® 1-780.32 r-184.86 1-178.63 4Y SLEEVE _._ CB-182.23 YARD DRAIN - { - POWER POLE GAS SLEEVE I _ - r-1g2go i-19.17 184.16 HYDRANT ..-- ,,,a� 186.261-17&98 YAt DRAIN RIVER AIN - �� RETAINING WALL W I o ..0. 19.77 r- 178.94 CONCRETE WALL __ -- i-180.86 100 IOX DRIVE 1�'n i 6' h-f7167 16' in- 17147 12' PVC __ I 1 HYDRANT FFE-185.0 6' PVC - ti pg 1 8' out-17157 1 12' h= 174.14 .. .. 1 YARD DRAW - •ram i 1 15' 1n- 77150 --- c9 -•--: BUILDING 1 15' in- 172.74 200 fox DRIVE 1 h8076.09 - .- OVERHEAD POWER 1&,. 7, - y{/-17flet FFE-T85.0 1 out= 172.56 FFE:1gSO I outs17S29 - 3 L 110" 1n-773.42 �. 'd -�- CDOLI VI I f0- h-17J.42 a VAULT h TRANSFORMER RETAINING WALL _ ce c� TOWER 1 15- h=173.07 �.� �'� -. r-177.38 ry t 15' out-17102 _ GO 1 12' h=16&28 rCo -179.0 to (� YARD DRAIN STORM MH _ -- 12- h-iB&Tg 6' PVC SEWER r=171.J9 1-12 r-17241 -19.77 118- h-1875J S YARD DRAIN 1=173.84 789.04 1-16&32 1-I68.61 f2' PVC -_ i f I3' h=167.53 .., I r-f 9.41 -- i 18' out-1BZSJ C.O. - I � ..d1.E5 CO. 12' PVC /2- PLt •'•4 - ut I a SARI I O _ . t 1 ENO SD-12' PVC - CB _18429 - - 15 PVC Sp - 177J0 1-177.49 - C.O ` \4` CURB _ _ I-17Lo ii R SIDEWALK P v 1 I SO �0 1. a -RETAINING { I II I ( i l l HYDRANT •v ' WALL ` ® SEWER MH - h " 5' CONCRETE _._ SEWER MH \ \ POFEIA Co r-172. 40 SIDEWALK h CURB -- _ r-174.70 C6t>E I-I8706 = -181.16 1-17580 1 � PNO R� I I I I i I165'J7 AREA OF WORK RATE Ott �firtltll116�.P�C+ \ � HYDRANT a--f- I-181.56 � -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-176.J7 .HYORAN ) lA 1-16727 April 4, 2014 WACR s a'"' °RA'j- =1 D ""� See A100 (Dated 04/04/2014) �=;;g_" d I 1 I UP I BI I ICI LIrJ-_L 1 I_-y. - rrrrrr------��73 P CB ` i I 7pO i2 n17749 o i b d b F �' \ I h-171t9 L' 1 '_ iW 1 �1 'PVC./ -_ i - 52 WATER MAIN CB g Z i t74:- I out=17I. 4 W & I h-169.26 ' r-170.00 C.O. 1 165.90 \\I 1 1 8' D.I. CLASS ` o I I I V ^---`- CONCRE -SIGN -1719 a - (I I III IIII IiI I I II II - I f-ilI . • �1�1it.- .o15Ifu 7td -lf` I68.QI T Ir.- /8462 ,'PVC UNDERORAIN 18' PVC 15- PVC >`1 12" h7166.32 18- I-16128 PAVD 1-163.27 l 15' -166.J2 WALK CBIbuf-166.22 24' HOPE bI76 J0 P7:1g5.08 STOW MH 165.93 a lr 2!• pvc r-171.84 � �� UNDERGR� 6' 0.1. CLASS - 0#1 -12- PVC 1-16112 DETENTION BASIN �. 1-159.6 i-151.1 ELECTRIC 52 WATER LINE hr- UNCTRIC BOX ` ' - � ElECR6C BO% � - � o w Ifi180 24" PVCSD 7f1P OF BANK- - \ OF DETENTION ELECTRIC � WV.- I64.J7 CB " `_ BASIN STUB ` ``\, _ 15' i 176.40 171.46 7 DETENTON W _ i-171.20 I M=186.16 ```\ / i BASIN r W I J - STORM MH !out-1g6.10 24- HOPE . _ r=17181 N9o-______�-CONmQ `Top OF BANK OF -SENER NH i-169.34 POLE �..-HYDRANT DETENTON BASIN r-f61.27 STRUCTURE T4' HOPE -HYDRANT t-154.37 -_.____.__.___ .. .. H. A_-..__.-..._ E DWAL� 12" WATER V 6' GAS MAW 12' WATER B' GAS MAIN MAIN \ i-15fl93 �'• ///�� `CONCRETE CURB SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 EDGE OF PAVEMENT ti/5fl06-� /-163.03 AND CURB ENO OF CURB I-156.13 [I, freeman fl 11\w•w- �•86YG5 Y�IiAa',ure GE HEAT BUILDI WERK 40 W S01 _BURUI Al: PRBIMIWRNPFIKIK SITE I Graphic Scale Fee! A 0 50 100 150 200 H EXISTING 3'th BLUESTONE STONE WALL BEYI TREADS BOLTED/EPXOY FASTENED TO TREAD BASE PLATE (TYP.) NEW CONCRETE INFILL STAINLESS STEEL PIPE EXISTING HANDRAIL. AGGREGATE FINK -,,,-SIDEWALK TO REK 6'CONCRETE SIDEWALK LED LIGHT STRIP FINE CRUSHED STONE UNDER EACH TREAD (3) STEEL STAIR STRINGERS - 7_ eis 1SURFACE! STONE OPTION B - STONE TREAD STAIRS SCALE: 112"= l'-O" 0 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8"= V-0" + EXISTING LANDSCAPE GROUND COVER TO REMAIN EXISTING ENTRANCE EXISTING TREE --- --- TO BE REMOVED. AND A NEW TREE PLANTED CREATE NEW ELSEWHERE ON PROPERTY. OPENING IN EXISTING STONE WALL NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 + 3 NEW STAIRS AND SIDE WALLS PER OPTION A r7. 101-0" 1 NEWAGGREGATE FINISHED SIDEWALK TO MATCH EXISTING • ADJ. IN COLOR AND SIZE. EXISTING TREE TO BE RELOCATED. RELOCATED EXISTING LIGHT BOLLAjkD �EXISTING TURNAROUND---,, 111-w SIDEWALK AND FINISHED CURB HEIGHT TO TERMINATE AND ALIGN K WITH DRIVING SURFACE HEIGHT. M CONTEXT PHOTO [I freeman f 81W*%" 9*4" kd� GE HEAL BUILD11 Muo 40 IDX Sol At: s.th 80,q,o, sft, Re— Applb,, WE PU STAIR 0 Lj' 4' a, 16' 2 - 0' 2 4' - - 28' 32' 1 Al s Smut UY ;n:" PLANNING & ZONING February 5, 2015 Re: #MS-14-11 — 40 IDX Drive Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained prior to commencement of your protect. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 0438 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com AR south u- loll o n PLANNING & ZONING Permit #5 CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (1 S) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ❑ Request for a conditional use ❑ Request for a variance 0 Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #}: 1DX Systems Corporation (a wholly owned GE Company; GE Healthcare ZITS USA Corp), 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403, P: (802) 864-1022 F: (802) 859-6848 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Book 501 p513; Book 501 p518; 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) G.E. Healthcare, 40 IDX Drive, S. Burlington, VT 05403, (802) 859-4724 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): Jim Gaboriault - G.E. Healthcare 802 862-1022 a. Contact e-mail address: jim.gaboriault@ge.com 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802 846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www,sburl.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 40 lDX Drive 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0915-00040 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Remove from the site approximately 240 cy of sediment collected from the settling to an approved facility. The two sediment ponds were restored to their design capacity over the summer. The sediment is temporarily stockpiled in an unused parking lot. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): N/A c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): N/A --- ----- ---- d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): N/A e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): N/A f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): N/A- g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): N/A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): NIA 2 Conditional Use/ Variance IMiscellansous Application Form Rev. 12-2011 N E a. Total parcel size: Ft. b. Buildings: Existing % / N/A_ Sq. Ft Proposed N/A q.Ft. c, Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing N/A 0 �0 " N/A - / Ft. Proposed NIA % 1 N/A Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _N/A %/ N/A Sq. Ft. Proposed N/A % / _N/A Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: NfA -Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping $ N/A N/A c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): NIA 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION N/A 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION N/A 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE December 15, 2014 14) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time Conditional use,, variance / miscellaneous Application Form, Rev 12-2011 of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT LT — OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be: �OMPLETE ❑ Incomplete The applicant or pernuttee retains the obligation to identi,, apply fop-, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form Rev. 12-2011 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 22 day of January, 2015 , a copy of the foregoing public notice for Miscellaneous [type of application] 4 MS-14-11 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Refer to attached list on two (2) pages Dated at [town/city], Vermont, this day of , 20 Printed Name: Oscar Garcia Phone number and email: S - - 23 / sqar.garcia@stantec.com Signature: Date: 01 ORM S Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service ro ni. Rev. 1-2012 f.. SCHEDULE E Adjoiner Information Submit with the application a list of all adjoining landowners with mailing addresses. An "adjoiner" is a person or organization which owns or controls land or easements on lands which physically abut the tract or tracts of land on which your project is located. Be certain to include landowners on the opposite sides of highways, railways, and rivers. Also include homeowner associations, utility companies, and others with significant legal interest in the project land. It is very helpful if you indicate the location of each adjoiner on your site plan. If you do not provide a list which is thorough and up-to-date, your application could be delayed because of improper notice distribution! Please note: For lists which include more than 20 adjoining landowners, our administrative staff appreciates receiving the list on mailing labels to facilitate the notification process. Thank you. PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPER T Y OWNER NAME MAILING ADDRESS 40 IDX Drive Contiguous Properties includes properties directly across ` ubliic'roacis 1333 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 1335 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, ,1341 Frisco, CO 60443 (landlord) Seaway Car Wash, Inc. 368 Olde orchard Lane Shelburne, VT 05482 (tenant) 1360 Shelburne Road BDP Realty Associates 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 1459 Shelburne Road Anthony Socinski 1459 Shelburne Road. South Burlington, VT 05403 1475 Shelburne Road Two O'Briens Properties, 1475 Shelburne Road LLC South Burlington, VT 05403 1485 Shelburne Road DBS Limited Partnership 1485 Shelburne Road cfo Goss Dodge, Inc. South Burlington, VT 05403 1580 Shelburne Road Alison Partnership, Ross PO Box 1100 Anderson Burlington, VT 05402 40 Green Mountain Drive Alison Partnership, Ross PO Box 1100 Anderson Burlington, VT 05402 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and 109 South Prospect Street State Agricultural College, Burlington, VT 05405 Office of University Relations Attn: Linda Seavey & Operations 85 Green Mountain Drive NP1RE 85 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 75 Green Mountain Drive Pamme112 and George 147 West Shore Road Starbuck Family Trust Grand Isle, VT 05458 41 IDX Drive Plaza Investments 28 Day Lane Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Mervin Brawn 35 Green Mountain Drive Contiguous Properties (includes properties directly across public roads 30 Green Mountain Drive Alison Partnership, PO Box 1100 Ross Anderson Burlington, VT 05402 45 Green Mountain Drive Meadowood Enterprises 212 Meadow Wood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and 109 South Prospect Street State Agricultural College, Burlington, VT 05405 Office of University Relations Attn: Linda Seavey & Operations 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE 85 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05043 ray From: Myers, Jack <jack.myers@stantec.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:33 AM To: ray Cc: Main, David (GE Healthcare) Subject: GE Healthcare #MS-14-11 Ray — As discussed we would like to postpone this hearing. We will be over with a $50 check today. Thank you, Jack Myers, PE Associate Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT 05403-7824 Phone: 802-497-6418 ext 127 Cell: 802-238-0359 Fax: 802-864-0165 jack.myers@stantec.com IJ - I Celebrating 60 years of community, creativity, and client relationships The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. 1 O Please consider the environment before printing this email. .3raa .gas �s os or aAw a► t s t 0 S a j r < r vowowtwl Mal I ORIGINAL SHEET - ANSI B Legend (3 Stantec 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 www.stantec.com Notes 1. RED 'Y' INDICATES SEDIMENT ELEVATION PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 2. SEDIMENT REMOVED TO ORIGINALLY DESIGNED GRADES/ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEV Al 160.0 A2/DUP 159.0 131 159.6 133 158.6 C 1 159.2 C4 159.2 D2 159.6 D4 159.5 E3 159.1 E4 159.9 F4 159.0 SPOT ELEV SOUTH — 1 158.4 SOUTH — 2 158.8 SOUTH — 3 158.6 SOUTH — 4 158.5 SOUTH — 5 158.8 SOUTH — 6 RECEIVED NOV 2 1 2014 City of So. Burlington i 0 50' 100' Pond File: Elevations.dwg NOV. 2014 Client/Project GE HEALTHCARE STORMWATER DETENTION POND Figure No. 1.0 Title PRE & POST EXCAVATION POND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS I 1 8' O CUSS 3 � U 52 WATER MAIN 1 MH I I r-21d 70 C8 99.79 4 -t-19Z out-19258 ELECTRICAL GAS SLEEVE 5=. CON CRE E OF PAVEMENT M1217.22 1 13" h-210.32 n 14' h-11I.77 $ I out-210.iJ 6 UNDERORAN HYDRANT SEWER H -204.24 1-1976060 4' PVC UNDERCRA/N 08 - 215.44 DRIVEWAY I MTC 1-211.53 --- -- -- ----- -- -- - �- -- ------ -- - - --°�_-- �� SEVER MN I WRB r-216. IN CUT I WATER 8' A.C. MAIN VALVE CB y SEINER MH r-21I.23 �r-211.r4 CURB -------------�-- ---- ---5--- -- -iiz7 GREEN MOUNTAIN DR D.I.-------- _w�F- ---------------- -W� GAS UNEI---- TE SDEIPA / 15' PVC SOR/IJS STORM GRAIN H µT T ELEPHONE PDESTAL DO 211.09 I t / STORM MH / "-�5" VAULT d TRANSFORMER 12' P -211.55 .Ea7571NC WELL h207.23 I�PoIIER I ABANDONED DRAIN PIPE CB 18d43 EXISTING WELL I I AND CONCRETE HEADWALL h-I84.58 I out-184.45 _ DOS � _ -188.13 I 1-1"13 r-194.26 f out-184.fJ , 1 12' h-18196 m I I I I I 6" p� 16' h-I6T.46 I UO ` 1 12' out-18221 CU I R-186.04 CERETE I CURB \ /?•`P� I-179.71 SQ / I-179.37 IELEPFICNE PEDESTAL I I I I �V\ YARD DRAIN -,9263 • SO I ^ 1H7.74 l-I88. A L d �VI' �4', \' W 179.78 121fOPE I I I l l LUMINAIRE A IFR i \16 1 I h6•-173.50 a H ^4 s' PVC f Ih -17113 I5'PVC (TYPICAL) \ C7 at-T71T2 MH I-186.48 0p/ \ / CONCRETE PADS GENERATOR PAD SEWER r-18S48 r-H 8213 11 h-179.77 ! 12" h-f 79.68 1-17486 1 18' h-17O53 I I i i 199. 77 IN CB h18S9 4'P i 1 h7d 188 CB 1 out-170.41 I v 7-19297 1� 187 i� r-I82. 76 1 1 \• I outI73.88T Cs 181.35 I 1 i COOING 8' P 4' PVC 1- 171.35 C.O. y,------------ I.183.83 r-19242 a � (� ro� \ \ Q 4 PVC C.O. � � I-19Of9 1-I83.92 ,VI / 186.46 \ i � � 1-18246 8" PVC //2• /------- '---- I ONE CB W 6' PVC �\\ -so I I MANHOE 4 PVC' 179.97 \ 9" WATER VAVE S - - } 8• I N gNER MH c GENERATOR*1 .1 •178.00 ==5==-- ---w- awmcusssz---- --S_ a I f-i�.iz -1 .9 CO -18282 L8 �-182.8J \\ �� 1-173.55 I n' f-178.63 /-I80.J2 184. B6 7A. CB \ I 11ER PONE Ce r-I8223 I828B I-179.17 YARD DRAIN 184.16 I86 1-17d98 YARD DRAIN C. SEINER MH 179.77 -W \� I 80. 1-180.86 100 IDX DRIVE /84. 71 / 6' h-175.7 - - \ f HYDRANT FFE-I85.0 6" P � 1 e' Out-175.57 1 \ I W CB YARD DRAIN 18474 BUILDING -2. GAS CANE\ J I-' 181.92 17717 1-17d81 10. h-1714T G f FFE-I85.0 - ' N MR I �i f0• h-17142 1 I5' C.O. %y .r W-171o7 115" t-17102 * \ A \IER 6' PYCx"" C.O. `\ \� 1 - 4 YARD GRAIN I-17.184 GI Qj'/ C.O. -\ l I END cu d SDEWALK j0. �/ \ u V / WALL ' CB a o1 yl ANT nV py _1 r-17456 h-169.26 out-16d66 \4' \ BETE \ SDEWA B 17744 h-170.74 \ r oNe-170.4e l CB \ \ -17Z49 \ \\ I h-171.14 \ \\ I wt-,7,., I HYDRANT -----CONCRETE L! RETAINING WALL 1 178.94 18" h- 17147 WALL \ 12' PVC I lml 11T' h- I74A4 1 5' h- 17 Cs 1 h- 17274274 15' 200 IDX ORI4£ - 18076.09 I OYERHEAO POWER I Out- 17258 FFE-185.0 /out-175.29 I VAULT d TRANSFORMER RETAINING WALL i CU17738 C.O. I I I 172' h-16d28 112' h-r6d28 CB CS YARD DRAI STORM MH -RD- I 118' h-I87.53 172.39 17212 172N 179.77 12' PVC >E I 1 15' h-167.53 I-169.04 1-16a.52 1-I68.61 / 18' out-167.53 C.O. 0. PVC 12' 12" -I- PVC `a __ I 0-- SD I l-_SDI2LPVC I i� - C8 In3D SEINER MH SERVICE 1/' I I I I I I I Id��IbrallU - U - - - -W 18 p,j, CLA55 52 WATER MAIN - �170.001 Mo9TeRlc ,11!�� T7De RECEIVED NOV 2 1 2014 City of So. Burlington TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. iH6 PUN IS ARABLE FOR THE PLMPOSE OF A 'RECORD DRAWING" IRS ftIN IS 9 KN A -AL ETELD L-TIM Ci SURFACE ENDENNCE TAAEIN aN NOY 7, 4 9. a Iq =I0 BY TRUOEII CONSULTING ENONFERS 111E ACNA UADEROLOMO LOCATION MAY VARY S MMY RRO4 IRS PLAN TE FROPQNTY LNES SROMN ON T RAN AIE APPROIOMAIE SINCE - SOUNOMY SURVEY HAS 9ED', NpIC1ED. TIE INTENT IS THAT EA6D.FNTS ASSOOATED WNH TE NEW UTRITES 91a= RUN INTH w A- M QAL LCGTTONS BEFORE USING THESE PUNS ENSURE TIAT Y011 HAVE THE LATEST REVISION LAST REVISED: 1 12/29/00 r-174.79 I-165.21 UTRITES I69-16"1 9ETIIER MAINS AND SERVICES SERVICES _S-- WATER MAINS - -w- - AND SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE -SD-- UNOERORAtI - -UD-- ROOF DRAIN --RD-- UOOD PROPANE --G-- OR NATURAL GAS OVFRIEAD POKER - -OHP- - UNDERGROUND par" ANO TELEPHONE __IIPdT--- I I CONCRETE CURB 9 1-16a1 iJ� ��/ Its' h-166.03 17t.9 IQ CB 96 1 F,Y.- 164.62 50 / \ 171.17 4 PVC UNDERORAN 16' in-165.29 �I I I AYED 18" PVC IS' PVC/ \ 1 12' h-166.J2 WA 1-16527 I ,5" h-166.3T I I \ W yy�` 418HOPE \ / t P� pVC�/ NORM MH`\ I-163.06 \ / -/� 1 12• PVC 24 LJ./ 171.64 \ UNDERGROUND J o 9' D.1. CLASS I 1-165.12 DETENTION BASIN \ R-r59.6 1-161.1 52 WATER LINE UNDERGROUND ��_UP_ �\ \ ElFClR1=BOX---_------__ I 163.60 24" PVC 5D� ELECTRIC BOXTOP OF \ F° --SO--- OF 01, IENRON `\ `\ ELECTRIC \ INV.- 164.31 II / I I �I 1 �8 BA51A \ STUB _- \ 15• DETENTION 116.40 11 r-171.46 \ � � -*---so- � BASIN I 1-1 .20 I h-165.18 STORM MH T I out-166.10 \� \ 24' HOPE f-169.34 �PIXEHYDRANT cp-3'�-------- STOP OF BANK 6 I l SEWER MH GON ROL DETENTION BASIN *15,C27 SIR UCNRE 24' HOPE HYDRANT I / I-,5437 HEADWAI --_I__ --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -===L- 12" WATER MAIN 6' GAS MAIN \� 12' WATER 6' GAS MAIN f-158.9J �?" MAN �� O1R8 SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE % EDGE OF PAVEMENT -sa ne \�a �Is1D3 AND CURB END OF CURB \�1-158.13 XPYEY SYMBOLS T-BAR (FOUND) e IRON RPE (FOUND) O �ONCREiE MONUMENT (FOUND) STET. RESAR (FOUND) O ICE CONTROL PUNT STEEL REEUR ICE CONTROL PUNT PX NAIL TICE WOODCONTROL PUNT 0 R O N PIPE TO BE SET O DIN ITY SYMBOLS SEVER MANHOLE STOW DRAINAGE MANHOLE CEAHOUT a CATCH BASIN ❑ CUTLET OR END SEC770H VALVE m FIRE HYDRANT WATER WELL THRUST BLOCK 040 CAP [ U7uTY POLE. MTC OR TRANSFOf>l/ER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL o UAIINA/RE 9 Graphic Scale Feet 50 0 50 100 150 200 wwwwmuwum H � H F' H ? . e 1 z4 •' : �w h� e w O Y� y� �Y U U Z J Z w Z Z U(� U Z W 3 RECORD - U < w I o t i 0- CO z o Z K g > O_ w N Of LA3 F- N o Q z z � Q m O 0 W N REC1 ray From: Main, David (GE Healthcare) <david.main@ge.com> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 9:14 AM To: ray Cc: Gaboriault, James E (GE Healthcare); Weaver, Lynne A (GE Healthcare); Myers, Jack Subject: postpone from January 6th BRB Ray Per our phone conversation today I am e-mailing you to ask for postponing our DRB application review (#MS-14-11) on January 6th to a later date to allow us more time to properly notify the abutters. Please e-mail us an invoice for the $50.00 postponement request/change as this is required for us internally to request a check. David David Main Environmental Health & Safety Burlington, Vermont Tele +1 802 862-1022 Direct +1 802 859-4724 Internal Ext. 79724 david.main@ge.com Enter a Concern Report using the link below: http://gensuite.ge.com/ge/home/?bid=26#/geh/ehs/incident/incident.cfm?Org=30&Loc=Burlington%20VT%2C%201T&g so=1 Stantec Transmittal Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington VT 05403-7824 Tel: (802) 864-0223 Fax: (802) 864-0165 To: Ray Belair From: Oscar Garcia Company: City of So. Burlington ❑ For Your Information Address: 575 Dorset St, so. Burlington, VT 05403 ❑ For Your Approval Phone: (802) 846-4106 ❑ For Your Review2 As Requested Date: November 19, 2014 File: G.E. Healthcare Delivery: USPS Reference: G.E. Healthcare - 195112952 Attachment: Copies Doc Date Pages Description 3 11 / 19/ 14 3 24x36 Pre & Post Bottom Elevations 3 11 /10/00 3 GE Site plan by others 1 Nov 14 1 11 x 17 Pre & Post Bottom Elevations Included are copies of the plans you requested. Design with community in mind E Stantec -* (�� 1/14 November 6, 2014 File: 195112975 Attention: Permit Specialist City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Sir or Madam, Reference: GE Healthcare Enclosed please find a completed Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application for the Development Review Board in regards to the above referenced project, including our check in the amount of $123.00. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Oscar Garcia at 802-497-6401 or oscar.garcia@stantec.com. Thank you, Regards, / w Marc A Kin Admirn ative ssistant Phone: 802-864-0223 Ext, 100 Fax: 802-864-0165 marcy.king@stantec.com Enclosures Design with community in mind m v southbli Vllx. PLANNING & ZONING August 7, 2014 Re: #SP-14-42 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Xvmymond I , 1. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com C P Mi N`f southburlin,gton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- 8 - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW p✓ Administrative p Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): GE Healtcare 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax: (602) 859-6848 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): GE Healtcare 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax: (602) 859-6848 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): James Gaboriault, (GE Healthcare Facilities Manager) 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 859-6145; 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: jim.gaboriaultQa ge.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00040 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Removing, relocating and replacing three additional trees during the process of constructing the (previously approved) exterior steps. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office Use - Will not change Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Office Use - Will not change d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Total Building Square footage will not change. (233,133 SF) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Total height of Building and number of Stories will not change. (3 Stories) f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): Not Applicable g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Expected number of employees (all office) will not change. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 713,948.5 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 11.49 % / 82,033 sq. ft. Proposed Same % / Same sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 58.01 % / 411,176 sq. ft. Proposed Same % / Same sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 25.97 % / 185,412 sq. ft. Proposed Same % / Same sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 130 sf * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $0 $ 3,450 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Traffic Unchanged 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation Unchanged 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Days of operation Unchanged 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: August 20, 2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of ubmitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 1 Administrative site plan applications require three (1) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Digitally signed by —,LW Burley DN: G=US, E=76ursey@FFFINC.cam, O='Freeman French Thomas Burseyp ,osz°6 0 tdoandMmazofM doWmem SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line .J,M 6,496, .,P EL-L' PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: 7 REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplrete Administrative Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 STORM DRAIN SN9 WATER VALVES 21706 FOX GNK 1-10a97 BU0.DN0 7E7/CE l It TELER PHON0 ELECTRIC l7057•M Am WA 1ER LINE _EXISTING STUB _SERER SNB ��Y1C LVA_HYDRANT CONCRETE CURB 3t I-215w DRIVEWAY C Do CLASS END OF PAIEYENT h211.3J 52 WATER PAIN ! i Ij� SERER 101 CIAO WATER CBCS, ---• VI S£6EIP YH /( - - !•_AG SEnMAIN. VALVE 52f1.23 211.14 F,` r.21A 70 CO r-T1AJ7 C1Rt6 r-216.M __ p1T , r- p��20°'60 4• PVC AM _-It1.12 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Q -- --__-- ----------- 3' C0.VCRElE SIDEWALK 21722 f5• PN; SMt J5 57tlN81 DRAW I Cliff ,5• -210.J2 21I.09 Nei 1�'«_21I.n HYDRANT -mfsr/Stc PEDESTALy I t-210.13 STO81 MIN VAULT S TRANSFORMER t EMSfING TELLF211.55 j OV AD „ e b POWER UNOERDRAN 15"AN ABANDONED DRAW PIPE �.. Z-IBCY ., oet_IIBc -18&13� 4z,T .Ivry.:. AND CONCRE7E�, HEADWALL I-/0a43 CB HYDRANT 1 ouf_lacN 184. 3C >s SEWER ' 0 p� Irt-I �y�L MO r_zoRT4 - I_f9760 R-1 TE True NCRE f .. /, �Mi0.5• 1 J I.. coCo p� "� 19a01 .-•h. I' YAAO (M +.A:_ i 41 S, a LIA N WE ev. Is• Me • 5E 15"A+x' f� PLc 1. SD. (TYP"l BOLE FUCK iSEWER ON � YE PAD6. Sc AT '� 18.:/tl BB.M ti I99.79 q iY ,\ ' I -N RA OR PAp Lnr I YF_i92.N li I Lg c -Iva \ � � .� "'�._ '•'a. Y'C•-8•9fd I out-i•LDe A r-t99.77 fr Ed, 1-1 1 t7 4 V, / tYrr=1T168 o ai9297� I_f r-16276 6:-PVC q / r wt.IM02 r- ifi.JS„ C8 f92.12 1 d Ok aL 2f ( M PVC 1- /71.A aQ 4• P\C a0. �16565 ¢ r. �I86.48 _. SD 1.100.1p i I-183.92 r ht82.w s•PLc - 5 i Y - _ _ TELEPHONE CONCRLK r-fa113 -1.... SIDEWALK � 1T�PVCy \ 4•P1C � co W 6• PVC � __. � WATER VALVE MANHOLE .CB GENERATOR ht1913Cal I_176.00 � TV .. S Q'SET" « SEWER �. A .i8• DI CUSS 52 a' ., - I I l w / ---� r-Ia4.OJ I t�l.• CO CB WATER MAN S M73.42 r-f6262 CR M6T.6J I.I73.S5 ELECTRICAL - ®,' h180.J2 184.88 Mra6! CAS SLaxLEEWE �� CB Dofa222 YARD ORAIN _ _._ POWER POLE - � -18 M 1-179.17 facts HYDRANT --- - ' Is6.2s YARD DRAW SELLER him CB RETA9lN' WALL P• M1a0.8B 184.71 Ga i70.n I7a84 CONCRETE WALL 2. b -- W 100 IDX DRIVE 16• «-1ra67 1 8• «- 17J.47 I PVC + 4 HYDRANT FFE-1a5.0 6• PLC `. 1 s• out-175.57 1 /2' «- 174.11 �-� YA11p OrrAw - 115• «_ i7150 �leaw 184.74 BUlOWC 1 MS' «- 17274 200 roX DRIVE OL£RHEAO POWER 7. OAS LINE.-_ --'1-1111.62 r-177.17 �. FFE-Ia5.0 1 ert. f7258 r MiraW - - If -.. 710•«_17142 s. FFF_185.0 Tool-1]S 2a - COOII d 1 I0• «-17142 CO y VALET a TRANSFORMER RETAWWG WALL - CB ' TOWER I I5• M17107 `>t 'E+ __ r-t72Ja I IS• out-17102 Co. - i ,2• «-isa28 fj 0.0 CB _C8 Ce YARD GRAN �IORY YH _ - I IS' «-16a2s 6• PLC SEWER - -In I72J9 17T. 12 172.41 I79.77 Ifo I IS' A,-,0753 S YAIR7 DRAW I-1 ]3.Bt i-I6D.04 I-IBs.sz 1-fsal 12• PLC - t _ _ r 15• «_-167. r-t79.4r - i fa• ovt-r67.33 I , i ' o R i C.O COBBLr o.` 12- PYC I ' .. 12• PLC as 'P.N SD ' I SO ,2. PW CB r_tac29 ' am - END 777J0 I_142 i C.O.D1Ra eVC `�' A SEEK" 1 so ] or lP `: � 1 I i i I I j 1 I 11 li ®.. HYDRANT SEWER MH 5' CONCRETE -a SEWER MH / f7240 &WHALK A CURB g _114.19 �tM.M 1 I C.O. I M167.00 I 1-16S21 1-17A•O i 1 R� 1 1 I I I ,-- 6•;-T6s.J1 _ I I'I III' I'l `L I 4 Iaf.aa I 7% . - ®CONGK7E M CURB ra.J7 NLDRAN Ira CUNB \ ( - .♦ I-I8727 SM~M WATER SEANCE \ _ UP4. 0.a _ ".. �t lE ca STOWIw *Iol - -- I 17'7.44 II I ut-170.71 1 LIP GO' 1 aIf_,7a I I Y P \ M77w \ n4. �� - loaf-171.1{ C F� �'- - w�'_ - ---...__DO -- 0z-o.t CLASS 32 it- -WATER YNN /e• PN; : 1-189.211 is %163.90 -- e_I6a66 ' - al s l. I I 1 Comm ' CIS sail _ «_ te4.6T N, I Q'- -0 •'' j \` __ �.1 12, i 7 ( 4• I "W"WERAN 1 /8• Er.1812a g RAND fe PLC 15' P1C 1 12• M/80.]2 1 t 1 F-164.92 1-t 65.Z7 1 5• Mf8s32 { T 41� 1 1 WALK 3 (TRANSPLANTED) ' - 24' HOOP , � I I I 11'. I �I HONEYLOCUST _ ] �` +i- 4.5. 5• CAL TREES "9f, - �- r siDRY w re' PLc ( - 1-16512up OETENI)DV BASW _-•�,. .TALL n 2/' PLC 'm - ELECTRIC ----- _ _ - � taxa0 SD TOP OF BANIf- -'�`� NV.- 164.3. OF DETENTION ELECTRIC Ca Cs BASIN �`.\ STUB/ �TENMW / R W t76.40 tiI71.46 / /I ; -� SSW, .171« .20 1 -1"IS •� j ad, 't N - STOIIY YN I Out-r66.10 `. / 24' IiOPEJ •: 1-169.34 POLE /- HttMANT f•P.```T'-------- `�_-_-- ------ TOP OF SAW OF SEWER YH �SiRI1CRRK - ,• - CO/7ROE DETENTION BASTI -ISU7 !' 24' IOE 'lN1/MANi -- 1_154.37 HEA,TRA 4- _ _____-- t2• WATER YAM 8' CAS MAW ,� r fY WATER 6. OAS YAM \ M56.3 4 NM 56.13 CONCTCIE GARB Graphic Scale SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 EE - PAYEYENTS W �1, /F 6 03 s D 50 1C fill _j 150 nc freeman french freeman �a yRa„amun GE HEALTHCARE BUILDING 100 EXTi IOR STAIR 40 IDX DRNE SOUTH BURUNGTiDN A1346 of/oo�fa r -sa� a° fNBM1AINPYC92i SRE PLAN REVIEW D49XlO,4 811aW STIMAGE MEA ARD Bx(E cK IDEHnEiED osxo.sol. 9 TREES RELODATEU 0H7Y201. SFTE PLAN KEY JOTY. ISOTANICAL NAME OMMON NAME I SIZE LEGEND DECIDUOUS TREES AR 1 Acer mbrum RED MAPLE 4 1 2'-5" CAL FP 47 F... mus pennso-nica Palmore PATMORE GREEN ASH 4 1 2'-5" CAL MB 34 Malus baacata spp. CRABAPPLE 3 1 2'-5' CAL GT 40 GI ditsio lriacanlhos Shademast ONEYLOCUST 4 1 2'-5' CAL GT 31 Glediteio triacanlhos 'Shademast ONEYLOCUST 5'-5 12' CAL AS 3 Acer saccharu SUGAR MAPLE 4 1 2 -5 CAL BA 24 Betula nigro Heritage' - Single 34eMTAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5"-3" CAL. AC 16 AmManchier conodensis SHADBLOW 8'-10' HGT. TC 7 Tilia cordato UTTLELEAF LINDEN 4"-7" CAL. OP OP 9 paluatris PIN OAK i"-7' CAL. PA 2 Plotanus x acerifolia LONDON PLANETREE 4 1 2'-5" CAL AP 1 4 Acer laton.ides INORWAY MAPLE PE 16 Picea obies NORWAY SPRUCE 8'-10' HGT. PN 9 Pinu. ni ra AUSTRIAN PINE 8'-10' HGT. PR 3 Pinus resinosa RED PINE 20'-22' HGT. PR 5 Pinus rasinosa RED PINE 10'-16' HGT. CA 75� Comus alb. REDTYAGGED DOGWOOD 5 GAL. V-4' VC 1 19 Viburnum cossinoides IWITHEROD VIBURNUM 30'-Se' HCT. EVERGREEN SHRUBS ru JS 442 Jun' a sabino 'Broadmow BROADMOOR JUNIPER 18"-24" SPRD. EV 610 Euon etus Sarco.le JBIGLEAF WINTERCREEPER 18"-24' SPRD. GROUND COVER -PERENNIALS CM 1 354 lCarex momoel 'Goldband' SEDGE OPRE—EXISTING TREE OPLANTED TREE = SHRUB/PERENNIAL BED WAGNER , GE HEALTHCARE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT PLANTING PLAN AS BUILT REVISIONS .07.23.14 e1"••—R!0•!••°5.•,'° DRAWING NO. JOB NO. SCALE I" = 30" DATE 04.24.14 LS. 2 .4 SPA��4 southbudington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW mAdministrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being reiected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): GE Healtcare 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax: (602) 859-6848 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): GE Healtcare 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax: (602) 859-6848 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include naive, address, phone S fax #):.James Gaboriault, (GE Healthcare Facilities Maned. er) 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone (802) 859-6145-1 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: jim.gaboriault@ge.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 G. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00040 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802 846 4106 fax 802 846 4101 www sburl corn I 01 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Exterior Site Stair - adding a stair from the parking level to the sidewalk at the level of one of the building entries.T- b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office Use - Will not change c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Office Use - Will not change d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Total Building Square footage will not change. (233,133 SF) e. Height of building &: number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Total height of Building and number of Stories will not change. (3 Stories) f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): Not Applicable g. Number ofemployees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Expected number of employees (all office) will not change with this site stair project. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 713,948.5 Sq. Ft. Existing Proposed 11.49 % i 82,033 Same % / Same sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 57.83 %/ 412,876 sq. ft. Proposed 58.01 % / 414,176 ___ sq. tt. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 25.97 % / 185,412 sq. ft. Proposed Same % / Same sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1,300 sf * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing; more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $0 $ 52, 515 a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Traffic Unchanged w/ new site stair 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Hours of operation Unchanged w/ new site stair 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Bags of operation Unchanged w/ new site stair 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 1, 2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)I regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the C'uty at the tin ginitting the site plan application in accordance with the cit 's fee schedule. Am Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11 x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011 I NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 1 7.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Draw, e.11wro.a.., ON C•V$A9.E-iDuwr@Frflrlc mn D•�n«n.n F.wK1. Thomas Bursey°�� D„•M�.K,�N.�..e.-� D- 2 I D.WY tl 1Ktl�K1 ✓d nq.Y OI IIA OOann.t cti,.�aaI. , e.eaw SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT gig NATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line Jg0tvs 6A96-94141.f- PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTI IORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed his site plan application and find it to be: Complete Inc7P I ministrative Officer OD'at The applicant or pewnittee retains the obligation to hiewifi,, apply for, and obtain relevam state permits f r this pr•ojea Call (802) 8 79-56 76 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011 May 15, 2014 Re: #SP-14-13 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely, 7Ak, JIVondJ. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com TRANSPLANTED HONEYLOCUST TRANSPLANTED HONEYLOCUST wA TER L * SIU6 Sa -.-- IYA TER YAN 1 /rw Ls�_ g�_ r-21A70 tb �{ / -21137 LIR® r-21�6.M Q! r AG g W1N.. .. K MW ®211.21 �aw.eo /-2r1.ra GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE GAS & rs' P 4• IF,C IANOERORAN wA s CCmwTE 9oETtAtR -- - -- a 22 1 r.I7.p i rd' F.210.l7 IS' PK SOR JS STfNY OR" i s• hall.)) - N1DRAlI7 �-_ IEIFPNOIE "A, S! sum MRJJ/ 211.55 4n� YAIAr t iRAMSPQREEIf `MWELL 1-207.21 0 - UMERORAW 12 P•C L AN ABANIMIE AD LL �''" E•5'Iwr: P -Cs NYDRANT A16) LLYKJSTE HEADMYl lb-1 stw r-i6A113 �..• ... I h MI3 M21 I twl-16..13 }j h A'Yd SERER 6' pw / r 4 N.I cr. IW \ LO ..J2.�204.24R 'T2' 19760 ii � I R-186 )• IY pie - Sp tiEii.51 -19104 Jib tltl ! T Ft e ♦ , r n _- 7 r I 13•HbPE - a i UYIME Y w,7J ao i sdYC SD� () IS• PVC 1� 13'J.. w v15 I \Nc-t.W P40t I1=,1Fot.i4»6 n C Iw;'AQR PAP Aao t]n 192.6. -16a i-17td ]r 4 r Uoym 1 g271 6r.. / 1 M-17AM M-M , •• ODMJW C hC N t7i..iq CQ 4' PvC CQ Wr_iu02 .. - ®166.« 106EJE �• t $ ' 1-re2.6 s' PYc " PYD ' p 0 r Pvc pk S >• ro•1/7t vAL1E So 5O7p1E1E " yy 90EwALR g .tY y 6M rslu r70.6) 6• - s C QIARAtOf 1-r7Au r-r7tp s � r r a aAss S2 �R 1 pr CO w Cs i ' Are: AN � � s UNOERGROND ELECm Em"m r AC t TELD11oNE MAYM MMI - Srow dPAN snis fl ATM YKca 1f5 I BUEDMG � LNR 11706 I-70A6) --SEVER STUB -- OoN "El NB rSM p6YklMY �•� N EMD OF PAIEICNT F2II.53 \ ♦ r-r626a 'w 1-162At ELECIPOW ,0 1-160. J1 -IM.66 W76.6J SLWW CB w YARD CRAM ■ r r.1622J CAS IIFE'K w r-167.« hI7Y.1] r.IM.16 NNMNVT h17A98 SEVER W C8 WTAWM WALL D I 00 'DR)* YARAWW CO. IM77 17a" CONOMW YYLL M N160p f 100 OX DR)*1 6' b-17167 I r M 1E147 Ir PVC t NwRANT M-16So 6• Pw 1 C M-17137 1 Ir a. 176.1e O YARD DRAW I fr F- 17130 (a Ir1.62 l r�l]717 t r CAS ✓------'- ►.I7lW i IO• M171 sa .BUSDW5 1I♦OM TTE-fSO UI- IN]I 171b-inp 77F-I630 M-r326 1 ♦ , r0• w-17112 C. YMAT t TRANSFORMER JWTAM1C OWU 1 13• h 17107 'C b 1 IS' -W7102 ♦ CQ 1 C CS 65 VC SEWN TAllp WS&M 1./A GRAN / ." F�p1I,i61 Fla -ini2 Y� rn61 ^St�77 'r F%C r176.41 I6r 4 ♦ 0' r i y , caeetis >p ' IY. PMC :.. �,�• hC ;'4 916• - o END � . EXISTINGTREES c1Ale g A sDEwAEx ° 'D AREA OF WORK RETANRID I I wAu �t161 Irl r corDREa « ' April 9 2014 �Q -p a scarp"t am 1:17a♦o I �:,.. � I i �11f.6♦ ; w�See A100 CUM I .16I ®I I Fr]r.A , H}DFAH ''� (dated r (nvl I sraMM D � 0RA6/ 6w1ER sarvxx \ Y COWA rE w SINS F- O&O 1y{ 1y{ I 04/04/2014) 1. 1, \ MXwALR 17744 F R I Ca \ \ 1 dEi. �70, )I I, w � s �� I V i s 6 I 'Y 174.35-\ e-m I m. _ - �- r e'U.L QAsf -OY IM7lR IM_-1 6E o rr PY n-16626 NS/0 1-1616e \A4 I i I I I Ii I f SKN _ r. T.6 l OR 1 F/ r �• /1r ti-ta / a �_-- rr PvC e-IMs2 is, nc/ .16127 \ r-1707 \ 1 12. hwisa E1 IL I r w-I6A31 6• Pk UNOERORAIN l r6t tdis �� so MOPE N t J. p 1.1M]D 2.' / h16Sp �` �. �16� F/6563 P.IC S4' S/I. W I71.12 �\ IR'Ofl101p/0 r O LEAF [// W'QEFQQRO �6512 OE7EN710N MSI I.IlJ F/6f.1 El£CR6C p IIN/ER L MA 21' ►1CSCLECM 9M or 11Y- IN es 4�rJ6« p 1-17L« NSAW Or I Or OEIE111101I BA9/ ElEC71tlC �. ///`{/%� Y Ir OVE717gN RASE r ff7t.20 5101♦1 161-90LIS `. `• �� \ -17&82 MIE -1/lf0 `��____ aC HpE� • _'___�_--`---__________ 1.1"36 M1p1ANT - ARM 24I' IQP[.. HYDRANT TOP OF OEtEN RI ____ •________ __________ _..._ ...__ _4A______________.__.__. ...--.________-___ - ..i-- 1044 ____. ___________________________-_______________-_-_. 12• wtip AN6. l2• wAtm r as UM YAW SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 1-lseae 7�ua �Qe 63113 caroee a�iRePA.EYENT ENO OF CURB fleernan french freeman GE HEALTHCARE I BUILDING 100 EXTERIOR STAIR 401DX DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON A1346 01/04/14 1 V-50'.0 NmtraNNarAm 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW O+VMM14 SfiE PLAN AS -BUILT PLANT LIST - 2.03 KEY JOTY. BOTANICAL NAME ICOMMON NAME SIZE LEGEND 1 Acer rub— RED MAPLE 4 1 2"-5" CAL 47 F—nus pennsyNonico Patmore PATMORE GREEN ASH 4 1/2--5- CAL 34 Malas baccato/spp- CRABAPPLE 3 1 2-5CAL 40 Gleditsio triacanthos Shademost ONEYLOCUST 4 1 2"-5" CAL 31 Gleditsia trioconthos 'Shademost ONEYLOCUST 5"-5 1 2" CAL 3 Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE 4 1 2-5 CAL I 24 Belula nigro 'Heritage - Single ERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5"-3" CAL. 16Amelonchier conodensis SHADBLOW 8'-10' HGT. 7 Tilic cordala LITTLELEAF LINDEN 4"-7" CAL. 9 Ouercus p.Iu.tris PIN OAK 4"-7" CAL. 2 Platanus eritolia LONDON PLANETREE 4 1/2"-5" CAL 4 Ace, latanoides NORWAY MAPLE 3 1/2"-7" CAL PE 6 Picea abiee NORWAY SPRUCE PN 9 Pinus m rnosa AUSTRIAN PINE 8'-10' HGT. PR 3 Pinus re RED PINE 1 20'-22' HGT. PR 5 Pinus res,noe. RED PINE 1 10'-16' HGT. ucuwu> annue� CA 75 Cornus albs REDTWICCED DOGWOW 5 GAL 3'-4' VC 19 Viburnum cossinoides VAT HEROD VIBURNUM 30"-36" HGT. EVERGREEN SHRUBS r JS 442 Juni a sabina 'Broadmoor' BROADMOOR JUNIPER 18"-24" SPRD. EV 610 Euon etus Sarcovie BIGLEAF WINTERCREEPER 18"-24" SPRD. GROUND COVER -PERENNIALS CM 354 Care, m wi 'Goldband' SEDGE 2 OT. NF 364 Na eta laassenii 'Walker 5 Low CATMINT 2 OT. OPRE-EXISTING TREE OPLANTED TREE = SHRUB/PERENNIAL BED J H t L H U K N t K U A U K U U I it ! W SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON I. ANDSCAPF. ARCH ITFCTURF_ Ttl02.SLq.OG 10 Ftl92.8si 626' wv..._ r, rl. n.uoin GE HEALTHCARE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT PLANTING PLAN AS BUILT REVISIONS ®.w.. ....�.....,�..�o ,o. DRAWING NO. 108 NO. SCALE " = 30i-0. DATE 04.24. 14 LS • 2 LEGEND OPRE-EXISTING TREE OPLANTED TREE SHRUB BED 30 0 30 60 SCALE OF FEET WAGNERl 01_ f . GE HEALTHCARE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT PLANTING PLAN AS BUILT REVISIONS o""`A A" "u" ' DRAWING NO. JOB NO. SCALE I = 30'-0" LS. I DATE 04.24.14 o structic ), Inc. 219 Pearl Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 March 18, 2014 Jim Gaboriault GE Healthcare 40 IDX Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Front Entry Dear Jim: Telephone (802) 879-2800 Fax (802) 879-2888 We are pleased to submit the following price breakout for 2 options to re -configure a new entryway at the front of the 100's building. These prices are based on drawings by Freeman, French, Freeman dated January 4, 2014. OPTION A: Match existing stairs to the north $76,725.00 OPTION B: Stone tread concept without stone side walls $52,515.00 COST ID: To remove and replant 2 existing trees. $ 2,250.00 (This cost is included in both Option A and Option B above) Exclusions: Hidden conditions, hazardous waste removal, off hours and permits Thank you for giving us the opportunity to price this work for you. Please call with any questions that you may have regarding our quote. Sincerely, Joe Brigante * This price valid for 30 days from above date. Agenda #3 VA southburfington PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Dan Albrecht, Contractor, Chittenden County RPC Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: August 7, 2012 CC: Jim Gaboriault, Applicant RE: #SP-12-36 40 IDX Drive Site Plan Application #SP-12-36 40 IDX Drive S75 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Jim Gaboriault is seeking to amend a previously approved plan for a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of installing an emergency generator resulting in the elimination of three (3) parking spaces, 40 IDX Drive. Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Dan Albrecht, Chittenden County RPC Contractor, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on June 25, 2012 and have the following comments. The project consists of installing a 7.25' x 21' concrete pad on which to locate a generator which is 9'10" in height. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Commercial 2 Zoning District Required Proposed' Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 713,948.5 SF Max. Building Coverage 40% 11.49 % Max. Overall Coverage 70% 57.83 % \1 Max. Front Yard Coverage 30% 25.97 % �I Min. Front Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. tii Min. Side Setback 10 ft. > loft. � Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. � Zoning compliance Pursuant to Sections 14.06 and 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations, the following review standards shall apply to site plan applications: (a) The relationship of the proposed development to goals and objectives set forth in the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. This criterion will continue to be met. (b) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The base required number of parking spaces on the lot is 744. The existing number of spaces is 732, previously approved by the City. The proposed project will locate the generator pad on an area currently used for three parking spaces. This will result in a new proposed parking total of 729 spaces for a 15 space shortfall which represents a 2% waiver. The applicant is requesting a 2 percent off-street parking waiver (15 spaces) as permitted under Section 13.01 N. (2) of the LDRs which states that "(w)here the Development Review Board determines that a proposed land use or structure is adequately served by existing or proposed parking facilities, the Development Review Board may waive the off-street parking space requirements stipulated in Tables 13-1 through 13-6, by no more than twenty-five percent (25%)." page 2 of 4 Staff has reviewed the site plan and feels that the elimination of these three parking spaces will not have a material affect on the availability of parking for the facility. 1. The Board should discuss the requested elimination of three (3) additional parking spaces, fora total of a 15 space, 2% waiver of the base requirement of 744 spaces. Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities be provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bike rack is shown on the plans. (c) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. No changes are proposed to the general layout of the parking lot. (d) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (e) Newly installed utility service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (0 The combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens, and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings or different architectural styles shall be encouraged. No changes are proposed. This criterion will continue to be met. (g) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed generator will be screened from public roads by current buildings, sloping topography and roadside vegetation. This criterion will continue to be met. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff has determined that the reservation of land is not necessary. This criterion will continue to be met. (b) Electric, telephone, and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. The conduit from the generator to the building will be buried. This criterion will continue to be met. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure, and properly screened page 3 of 4 with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). This criterion will be met. (d) Landscaping and screening requirements See below under "utility cabinets and similar structures" OTHER STANDARDS: Section 13.06((B) Snow Storage. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B), snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans depict adequate snow storage areas. Section 13.07(A) Lighting. Pursuant to Section 13.07(A), all exterior lighting shall be shielded and downcasting to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties and rights -of -way. No changes to lighting are proposed. This criterion will be met. Section 13.18(B) Specific Standards for Utility Cabinets and Similar Structures. Section 13.18(B)(4) states that "There shall be sufficient landscaping with evergreens of sufficient height and density to screen effectively the facility from surrounding property." The proposed generated, located away from property lines, is not proposed to be screened 2. The Board should discuss whether the facility will be visible from surrounding properties and whether landscape screening should be required. Staff recommends the hearing be closed unless the plans are to be revised to incorporate additional landscaping. page 4 44 I STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF PLANNING AND LEGAL AFFAIRS RE: GE HEALTHCARE IT ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION # 4 APPLICATION # 4C0391-9C September 11, 2012 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Jeannine McCrumb, in the above -captioned matter. COMMENTS Criterion 1— Air Pollution Control Jay Hollingsworth, Environmental Engineer with the ANR Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Pollution Control Division has reviewed the application and reports that: The APCD does not require permits for emergency back-up generators but does impose minimum emission standards on larger engines over 450 HP. The applicant should also be aware that all new spark ignition engines are also now subject to separate federal emission requirements of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60, Subpart JJJJ - Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines. This rule applies to new, modified and reconstructed stationary spark ignition (SI) internal combustion engines (ICE), regardless of size and combusting any fuel. It is our understanding that engine manufacturers are directly responsible for certifying compliance for engines with a maximum engine power less than or equal to 19 KW (25 HP) as well as all gasoline fueled engines and all rich burn engines fueled by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), where the date of manufacture is on or after July 1, 2008. You must verify with the engine supplier that the engine is certified if it is required to be certified. This certification would relieve you of having to demonstrate compliance yourself, including the need to conduct an emission test on your emergency engine. This is a federal rule for which Vermont has not been delegated authority to implement so you will need to work with your engine supplier/manufacturer and the US EPA to ensure you comply with all the applicable requirements. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of N ral Resources By: �- eannine McCrumb Regulatory Planning Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs (802)318-8713 E-Notification CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILE #4C0391-9C I hereby certify that I, Jeannine McCrumb, Regulatory Planning Analyst, for the Agency of Natural Resources Office of Planning and Legal Affairs, sent a copy of the foregoing Agency Comments and Entry of Appearance dated September 11, 2012, by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the individuals without email addresses and by electronic mail to those with email addresses as indicated: GE Healthcare IT c/o James Gaboriault 40 IDX Drive South Burlington,VT 05403 j im.gaboriault@ge.com Trudell Consulting Engineers c/o Debra Bell 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 debra.bell@tcevt.com Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 110 West Canal Street, Suite 202 Winooski, VT 05404 rmahony@ccrpcvt.org District #4 Environmental Commission Marcy Harding, Vice Chair Krista Reinhart/Parker Riehle I I I West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Nrb-Act250Essex@state.vt.us stephanie.monaghan(&state.vt.us e nnine McCrumb, Regulatory Planning Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs southI PLANNING & ZONING August 14, 2012 Re: #SP-12-36 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely, X Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 4535 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburf.com southurlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- a - ✓ (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 00 ❑ Administrative evelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax ft IDX Systems Corporation, P. O. Box 4900, Dept. 201, Scottsdale, AZ 85261-4900 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Bk. 501; Pg 518 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Jim Gaboiault 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403; 802-859-6145, fax865-2069 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Trudell Consulting Engineers, P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 c/o Debra A. Bell 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: debra.bell@trudellconsulting.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 40 IDX Drive 6, TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00040 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Installation of a concrete pad, generator, fence, concrete barrier located on existing paved surface adjacent to building 200. This proposal is screened from public roads by current buildings, sloping topography and roadside vegetation. The proposal is to locate the generator in the existing parking lot which encompasses three parking spaces. I he generator height is 9ft. 10 inches and the cabinet co or wi e w i e. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office Building - 212,657; Connector/Cafeteria - 20,476 732 striped surface parking spaces and related site improvements c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No change d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Office Building - 212,657; Connector/Cafeteria - 20,476; No Change e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Original Office building height 40ft. with 3 floors; Connector/Cafeteria height 30ft. with 2 floors Existing east wing #200 height 38.5ft. with 3 floors (includes basement) f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Estimated employee capacity for existing buildings 825 h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Section 13.01 of the regulations requires 3.5 spaces per 1,000 sgft of GFA. In prior approval Finding of Fact #6, dated 2/9/1999 of the Finding of Fact and Decision for Final approval the Connector /Cafeteria was excluded ho, , , pa, king calculatio, is. Wit' i tl iS uACIUS"01 I t! it: pai kii ig would be as follows f0i tl iis pi uposal. Existing building GFA 212 657F Required parking 7444 existing parking 732* proposed an rking 729 The applicant requests a 2 percent off-street parking waiver from the DRB as permitted under regulation 13.01 N.(2). Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 713,948.5 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 11.49 % / Proposed no change % / 82,064 Sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 57.83 % / 412,908 sq. (� Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 35.97 % 910sf Shelburne Rd; 0%/0 sf GR.MT. Drive % 6002 Sq. ft. IDX Drive Proposed % / sq ft d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 392 : * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping: $ N/A c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No CHANGE 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No CHANGE 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: NO CHANGE 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: SEPTEMBER 2012 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (1 I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the Cty's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three 3 regular size copies, one reduced co digital (PDF-format) copy. 4 O g p copy (11" x 17"), and one 3 Sde Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer wilt provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SI NATURE OF APPLICANT PIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER mz Jan Do not write below this line e� it tiTr PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: �\ REVIEW AUTHORITY: 14"Development Review Board 11 Administrative Officer l have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 1.4 nplete ❑ Incom t „ Administrative Officer gate The applicant or pernrittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, anti obtain relevant state perrrrits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Applicatton Form. Rev. 12-2011 ./ -IItee June 21, 2012 City of South Burlington - Planning & Zoning Attn: Ray Belar 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: GE Healthcare - IDX Drive T.M. #0915-00040 Dear Ray: This request involves the installation of a 21 It. by 7.25ff concrete pad, chain link fence with barriers and conduit connection to the existing 200 building. This proposal is to locate the generator on exasfing impervious surface therefore no change to the existing stormwater discharge permit. Three parking spaces will be removed from the overall parking total and the applicant requests a 2 percent off-street parking waiver from the DRB as permitted under regulation 13.01 N.(2). Section 13.01 of the regulations requires 3.5 spaces per 1,000 sq, ft. of GFA. In prior approval Finding of Fact #6, dated 2/9/ 1999 of the Finding of Fact and Decision for Final approval the Connector /Cafeteria was excluded from parking calculations. With this exclusion the parking would be as follows for this proposal: • Existing building GFA 212,657 • Required parking 744 • Existing parking 732 • Proposed parking 729 The applicant requests a 2 percent off-street parking waiver from the DRB as permitted under regulation 13.01 N. (2). The enclosed please find a site plan application and set of plans. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the enclosed materials. I can be reached at (802) 879-6331 x18. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) e a A. Bell Senior Project Manager Encl. site plan application, sheet C2.01 & C8.01, $288 application fee cc. Stu King -ECI 20120621 Submittal Coverletter T R U D E L L CONSULTING ENGINEERS 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD, WILLISTON, VT05495 1 802.879.6331 1 WWW.TCEVT.COM SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 ERS CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED- IN -- CONJUNCTION WIO THE T.STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS GI THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, COMMITTEE PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCOC). LATEST EDITION. COPIES Aft, AVAILABLE AT WWWNSPEORGIEJCDC I.UNOERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AN O WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER, 1DMRWO SUBSURFACE MN OR PHYSICAL CCMIS IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE THAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED EITHER: (1) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH THAT ANY `TECHNICAL DATA' ON WHICH CONTRACTOR RELIED 15 MATERIALLY INACCURATE, OR (2) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE PLANS/ CONTRACT GOCUMENTS: OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHOWN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE, AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTER PROVIDED FOR IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER DISTURBING THE SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO 00 SO. 4.UDUTIES PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY TCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY S.DMSAFE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER B6 AND PSB RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS. INC. 'DIGSAFE" AT LEAST 48 HOURS. EXCLUDING SATURDAYS. SUNDAYS. AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS. BUT NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES. EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING THE SITE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE WWWGIGSAFECOM 6.J08SITE SAFETY. NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUOELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE), NOR THE PRESENCE OF TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE MATH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES TCE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSITE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CLIENT'S AGREEMENT WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TCE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. 7,CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE: TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CAFE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE, THEREFORE. WILL ITS REASONABLE PROFE5SIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WTH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. a CONS/RUC110N 092DWATIOre TCE MAY VISIT THE PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTIGN TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CCNTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PREf.EOMG IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE W1TM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT REVIEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES. TCE GOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NCT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, 5UB-CONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER OR ANY OTHER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT TICE .SHALL NOT SUPERVISE, DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL GVER THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PROJECT REPRESENTATION, THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES. GENERAL NOTES: OWNER OF RECORD: IOX SYSTEMS CORPORATION. P. 0. BOX 4900. DEPT. 201. SCOTTSDALE. AZ 85251-4900 I. PARCEL Of 0915-OD040 2.OVERAU LOT AREA: 16.39 ACRES 3. ZONING: COMMERCIAL 2 4. SETBACXI- 10 FEET I Ravi & REAR: 30 FEET RECEIVED JUN 2 5 2012 City of So. Burlington Graphic Scale Feet SO 0 50 100 150 200 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 Blair Park Pnad P.D. B.K 308 (802) 8796331(phane) Milhton, Vermont 05495 (802)87%,0OMW) Writ us on the web at. w TmdcllCormuidng.com is AM NrVLLTwlrmM tl ma/w e zgnt le In. errme,m oT ICE .rm , `�""O. s ar e. / mcN wro mew,,,va 0) rwr wama mr eu a g a r j ♦ A.va.A.aa No. Description Date By Revisions SSSS P \I\ IIN,IYYA y ' * N0. 76J7 k' CNL IL AA/N ll llll\\`\ Project Title GE Healthcare 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT sheet nee Site Plan Drawing NMrnber:,s,rr; EXtemlon : _.. Project manager: DAB_._ Drawn: _.. Date : 412012072 Scale: Approved C2901 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 24th day of July, 2012, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plan Application #SP-12-36, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of- way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: IDX Systems Corp P.O. Box 4900 Dept 201 Scottsdale, AZ 85261-4900 The Stonehenge Investment Corp, Inc. 25 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Vermont Commons School 75 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 The Heritage Auto Group Inc. 30 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Crane Edward B. Trustee 1335 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Lewis David Managing Partner 1325 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Pione Remainder LLC 1330 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Crane Edward B Trustee/ See Way Car Wash, Inc. 1341 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Gardner & Sons Development Corp 1360 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Socinski Anthony Trust 1459 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Two O'Briens Properties, LLC 1475 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 DBS Limited Liability Partnership 1485 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 The Heritage Auto Group, Inc 1580 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 NPIRE 85 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Terence Bradshaw 05403 Jeffords Hall University of Vermont Burlignton, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 Dated at Williston, Vermont, this 24 h day of July, 2012. Printed Name: Debra Bell Phone number and email: (80 - 31 d elom Signature: Date: Z v Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 Weaver, Lynne A (GE Healthcare) From: Weaver, Lynne A (GE Healthcare) Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:35 AM To: Weaver, Lynne A (GE Healthcare) Subject: FW: Burlington Generator Follow-up Questions From: Gaboriault, James E (GE Healthcare) Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 9:27 AM To: Weaver, Lynne A (GE Healthcare) Subject: FW: Burlington Generator Follow-up Questions Hi Lynne — see below for the authorization for me to sign Site Application Jim Gaboriault GE Healthcare IT Facilities Manager Click Here for GE HOT Global Facilities Support Central Click Here for Burlington Wellness Community T 802 859 6145 F 802 859 6025 C 802 355 0653 E jim.aaboriaultCa?ge.com www.gehealthcare.com 40 IDX Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 USA General Electric Company From: Kumm, William (GE Healthcare) Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:20 AM To: Gaboriault, James E (GE Healthcare) Cc: Main, David W (GE Healthcare); Paulius, Vidas (GE Healthcare) Subject: FW: Burlington Generator Follow-up Questions Jim — Good news! I authorize you to sign the application Thanks, Bill Kumm Manager, Global Facilities GE Healthcare IT T + 1 262 548 2789 C + 1 262 424 2089 F + 1 414 908 9406 SEMI MH -- -179.77 ;: : 1-17S61 -t-17157 w 06 PAVEMENT 17&" CUT S' JHW 173.47 �2 h ,,: 17t14 5: 73.50 0 15" In- 172.74 VALALT & - TRANSFORMER REMOVE 10 Fri SECTION OF CURB & ACREAGE CLIR9 CONCRETESIDEWALK UGHT POLE LAWN 4, 'T .. C., EMERGENCY SIDEWALK TO FIE 21*.7.25' CONOUIrS RMT SCALE- I' - 10' CONGFEIE SLAB. Off" FWAIN CAUOE STEEL 01"If 1401101 OR M ALIERNAX 00 RENFORRIBRO BARS ON 126 CEIVIERS 0 11' CO PACED CILSH"E, SRWE SOCEf OR AJOIF*0- E-L CONCRETE WALL BUILDING 200 r Of CLASS 52 ------------ WA T(R MAIN r SERER 181.35 171.M 1".. .SAL TRENCH CROSS-SECTION J.G. CABLE IN CONDUIT �SH TW.B. ' U12� -0 01) Q ED Et F- po LIGIN 7 -1.1 FEW .. O.EET- X &OPt ORE ELECTRIC PAR.t FEL- -E .ICT.. EWEEE -1. THE 1. TREFICHES ':2RELLEKCTA,- CO=T11' R-RE'rPRO 1- RHSFfETORKF 2 IRI-1 WO, . at L= OR 111. 1-1 =nHE I HCH 11 HII 1-11 BE IT T."11 OR OF ARHEIR ; HE .."= LIVE E_ ORTRH FOE.S -1. - 1 -1 1ARE- EOW- THE - Ef- OF - R, In BE OR, ff HE =S T R TI 11 36 E. M, 3. E-T SH- BE fWE- W A 4 "" LEFFE OF �1 - THE 'CLILERWRO CORKWHORS SWOOR mo= OnStOF SEWE AND GBS FROWES. C-1 SHIL BE OW It WRIET1 DEGREES E�Ll. THE EEECT 4 CORDAY - � � WWR- OF 15 WKSHES - THE - BE ELL 1. 710- COH-T I -EVE ERV-F B RECRARED V FEET 0. - - OF THE WRE, C, _ THE I-ELLED .-E.F WCOME1 � THE D1 =7.SFRFE S. E- BOARSORPHO IHE C04OB1. � BE SAI-T-0. OR EVELOW - 2 FEET Of 3 TMWWB S. OR ITIIETSIESE TMW$ IMF BE MEHIE EAHEE To =A -1 MT -1 BEI, TARREHES 1HRRAO BE 1. ED 10 FEET FROM A� STRUCI I-ESS THE COREXAT IS CIRO TO THE STM�Ilj C,=1T.;HT.11 LE101 .1 1- -1 ME HECESS- , HE 0 _ M' Z MC-TED In1Z`='-MRE.CH WITH ELECTRIC IHE U11- ;EET FROIR ARI WATERT SEWEI, OR - P-HE THAT FMILELS OR CO -ITS 1�t AL 4-1- 0' 12 WOHIS IS RE.H.- E-- THESE - ND[ S ME WEASIXIED CIEFTER TO-CENTEI, 1 1 � BE -OWED WHERE OB OFBI-TRWIS - AS - ME EER� UE ICK714.1 -DWR Tx M 24 N-1 -1 BE 1011R. WITH - -ET1 CAR. I IOR 001- SHILOWER - IB _ I VERMONT UTILITIES I ELECTRIC SERVICE REQUIREMENTS SOCIRPRI Mof P - URBAN AREAS (MOBBED LAW AREAS) x By VVERNIr NAME FEVRE x GM At CALVIAINZED FEN -TER -T WIN GREEN SLATS GTE fa0 ?W asFWALANIAL GMEID'INGRED FENS RIFE MAST BLUE GRASS AS 0 85 so so 0 So 4.0 ANNUAL RM GRASS 0 0 PAMO. T snonvoc - REVEAL. LVVE/*OVr AREAS (W"n UNDEKLOPED NAME AvixI) IRVINE x GERM AT is M4 M4 CREE)"No AEG TALL FEMM m 90 IAL2 0-a to 5 BROWER, TREFOL PERENNIAL RVEZRASS IS a .0 1, THE SEED - SHALL NOT HAVE A NEW CONTENT EKCAIIWo 0,40111 "11I AND SNALL ME TREE OF ALL No"ERES VIEW 51m. BLED m BE APPLIED FIBER � FxRMBL,S AS 1101I BY ENONFA I flar FORMULA 5-10-10 To X USED WITH SOM APPLED AT 7NE PLATE OF Lf"ONE TO Be APPLIED AT RE RATE OF 2 TOYSACRE OR M �m By THE ENGINEER. 5. y MAOT To K EVIDLY SPREAD At THE MIX OF 2 7ONIBIACIVE OR AS CEECw to, MAE a TORIOV, TO BE uw VON Sm AS hdC ON THE BLAME OR A; ORI , ALL RLINEW OVERSON ME*SAIES SMALL BE' AI FIREY, TO FINAL m�w AND SEEDING Post FOO a OOMRACw AREAS 0' EARTH SMALL K MEChMY1CALLY LOOSEVED To PIROVIDE t"'CAL AN AOEOLMW ROOTING � TO A MINIMUM PORIN Of 12 INCHES SEEDEV AREAS SHALL BE WATERED LNFL VEGE7A- . MAMLESNED WEN ADVERAI FIRECIFITA77014 KNOT AVAILABLE /—I N ummcm CONCUTE Pw ?MCA4 GAWAWED PEN C& W" GAU SMCZFXATMS AND T'Se"LL o"WIVARRIV, VRVVWE,,o, ?`Ee) "A CONCRI CARS DIM.NOS PAVEMEAET EIB'ABOSEN - MATEREVPIAOm E WHOVE SOCHI ABUTS A 9JBE CTAtE) (SUE 37 FLAN 1,01B WON) REEAR (TYPICAL) 7' REVEAL. 7 0 b0t I IF 00. F 0 0 cPS, El I El I — I 1=111E II 'b 9WSOLE SEAMAII 10 CLEAN 0 I= CIRL)SNOR RVN GRAVEL OR PLANT MK m FCF? SUB -BAY 1�' N iI.I.I.lai EAVEN't !ROVE REA) SIABBEAEATION EAwlc R�•P I I 1=1 I 1=1 11-111- MOTE- ADDITIONAL. MEASURES AT BULGING MA`CRALS TO JIM THE - 1 0.1 OR GENE;w (nAmetto, PROCTOR) ENGINEER, FtV? THE BROEIRSILK ADDITHORAL GRAVEL Go"S"C" AEL SERI Y--- .1 BAND ABORREM, AND CUSHION TV mmovatmARM, m AGE, y FREVARL BE USED N )ROORLY CRANED SOUS AC-,S mor A- EASE, OR OVER mmavBoc,E�T =W) IS 10 POP BORN PORI'm SVE`IAL` EARINGE FROST ACTION IN SENSITIVE AREAS SUCH AS NMOCM RAMPS AND POOR EN- IFENTS CON EYE CVJM A, SLDF;WA4K S4VT OUT EXISIING PAVEMEY'T 4 M� FAVEMINT I V3: "BICARING COVARS17 2 I'vRE7 o -.r Go,,BREG GRAVEL • Q0 0 Ir GRAVEL BASE ............ :-"� . . . . . . . . . . . . SAND MOM AND CUSVON OF NECESSARY CORA'ACT B"'Com 1AW -?EmAL m mEjovat III I I ILI I NOTE. MATCH DUSTING AIA70MLS F GREATER THAN SIOECAFIED MATERIALS I —A\ mA cur 314--f RECEIVED JUN 2 5 2012 City of So. Burlington TRWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ME) =m*ft*h:VWp.,x5== omm-mi"'W •_WW'"W"WHIARRIWIRWWWWW", I N. I D.B.Ofte, I — I -, I arlkftm P,*dT1" GE Healthcare 40 lDX Drive South Burlington, Vr Shentlift Site Plan and Details PVC)m nemeover - DAB Dravem. pit DOW 1 4120,12012 SCRIG I AS 5110%ff Apploved rr �s r4p, ..r southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 28, 2008 IDX Systems Corporation c/o CT Corporation System, Registered Agent 400 Cornerstone Drive, #240 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Expiration of Final Plat Approval #SD-05-41 To Whom It May Concern: It has come to my attention that the above referenced final plat approval expired on July 20, 2008. 1 have inspected the property and reviewed permit records and have confirmed that IDX did not undertake any of the development proposed on that final plat within three (3) years of the date of the approval. This has rendered the approval void. As a result, the properties at 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive are no longer approved for the development outlined in Final Plat Approval #SD-05-41. The lapse of the approval renders a Notice of Conditions, recorded at Volume 776, Page 461, null and void. If IDX or its successor owners wish to pursue developing the properties in the manner previously approved, a new final plat application must be submitted. e . Belair Administrative Officer cc: Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Vermont Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 VERMONT SECRETARY OF STATE �® Altt.}{iSS CQRFQi%�TiQNS QT1u,:R PRQFESSYQNA ELE4TYQNS PROGRA1dS I REGULATION: Corporation In1 1 Corporation Name IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION Corporation Status Active File No V-14992-0 Type Vermont Incorporation Date 06/02/1969 State of Incorporation VT Fiscal Month End 12 Registered Agent CT CORPORATION SYSTEM Address 400 CORNERSTONE SR. #240 City State Zip WILLISTON VT 05495 President VISHAL WANCHOO Vice Pres ANNETTE ELLISON Secretary JACQUELINE STUDER Treasurer SCOTT MENDEL Directorl VISHAL WANCHOO Director2 JACQUELINE STUDER Principal Street Address 40 IDX DRIVE City State Zip S BURLINGTON VT 05401 Last Annual Report 12/31 /2007 Reinstated 05/20/2003 Above accurate as of: 07/27/2008 111161,11ol io 1 Coflmcl Home I Site Search I Help Vermont State Page I Disclaimer This Web Page is http://cgi2.sec.state.vt.us/cgi-shl/nhayer.exe 7/28/2008 NOTICE OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL c WHEREAS, IDX Systems Corporation ("Applicant" herein) received approval for qM an amendment to a previously approved planned unit development (#SD-05-41) from U -J W rr O� the South Burlington Development Review Board by written decision dated July 20, 0 + 2005. The amendment consists of Phase 11 to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the cc A M east wing building containing 87,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 W U net new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 .c s ft. building, off -site parking approval and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at q� g, P 9 pP g p p 9 U Y M C6 35 Green Mountain Drive. The amendment further consists of Phase ill to include: 1) aCo Qconstructing four (4) story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office Q) v (a. use at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Drive _N � � Q to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The approved plans for the planned unit development, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, entitled "IDX, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT, Overall Plan — Phase II," dated January 10, 2005, last revised September 7, 2005, and "IDX Systems Corporation, 35 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, Vermont Site Plan," dated January 3, 2005, are recorded respectively in Map Slide 462 at Pages 3 and 4 of the South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Development Review Board granted said approval subject to certain conditions as set forth in the final approval motion; NOW THEREFORE the Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plans, known as 35 Green Mountain Drive and 40 IDX Drive (collectively, the "Property") are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicant's Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Development Review Board or its successor: 1. If the Applicant proceeds with construction of the planned unit development described above, the Applicant shall, prior to occupancy of the second additional floor of the east wing building, construct a 126 space parking lot on the 35 Green Mountain Drive parcel, and shall thereafter operate and maintain such parking lot for the exclusive use and benefit of the office building complex located at 40 IDX Drive. This condition shall remain in full force and effect until Applicant receives a certificate of occupancy from the City of South Burlington for the 565 space parking structure to be built at 40 IDX Drive as part of Phase III of the IDX expansion project. 2. This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or any interest in the Property. 3. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant's successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this /T day of January, 2007. IN THE PRESENCE OF: IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION By. Duly Authori ed Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , in said County, this I day of January, 2007, Duly Authorized Agent of IDX Systems Corporation, personally peared and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of IDX Systems Corporation. Be fore me, Notary PublicNw My Commission Expires: 2,66.'"•'� BTV.450758.05 v y' RM DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLC WILLIAM W.SCHROEDER bschroeder@drm.com Fax: (802) 862-7512 February 9, 2007 Via Hand Delivery Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Notice of Conditions Dear Ray: I am delivering to you with this letter a signed original Notice of Condition of Approval for the planned unit development issued for the IDX (now General Electric Healthcare) campus on Shelburne Road. This Notice has been revised to address your concerns regarding the references to approved plans for the development, and is in the form approved by Tim Eustace. Also enclosed is our firm check in the amount of $14.00 to cover the recording fees. Please let me know if you need anything further. Thanks very much. Very truly ours, William W. Schroeder Enc. cc: Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Mr. David Main COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT 0 ST. JOHNSBURY, VT 0 BRATTLEBORO, VT 8 MONTPELIER, VT 0 LITTLETON, NH ■ MANCHESTER, VT ■ WWW.DRM.COM DKM DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC WILLIAM W.SCHROEDER bschroeder@drm.com Fax: (802) 862-7512 February 21, 2007 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Notice of Conditions Dear Ray: Enclosed with this letter is a corrected first page for the original Notice of Condition of Approval for the IDX (now General Electric Healthcare) campus on Shelburne Road, changing the title of the plan for 40 IDX Drive to "Phase II" as you requested. Our client has authorized me to substitute this corrected first page in the original document. Very truly yours, _4 fL. ., William W. Schroeder Enc. cc: Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Mr. David Main BTV.553908.02 COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT ■ ST. JOHNSBURY, VT ■ BRATTLEBORO, VT ■ MONTPELIER, VT ■ LITTLETON, NH 0 MANCHESTER, VT 0 WWW.DRM.COM State of Vermont r WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 1, Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective January 1, 2005 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective April 25, 2005 Case Number: WW-4-0442-2 PIN: EJ98-0330.07 Landowner: IDX Systems Corporation P.O. Box 1040 South Burlington VT 05403 This permit affects property referenced in deeds recorded in Book 501 Pages 513 & 518 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of the connect two cooling towers blowdown drains to the municipal wastewater collection system located at 40 IDX Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. This does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4C0391. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety— telephone Williston Regional Office (802) 879-2300, and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans that have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project No. 195111117, Sheet C-1 "Overall Site Plan" dated September 2006; Sheet C-2 "Cooling Tower 1" dated September 2006; Sheet C-3 "Cooling Tower 2" dated September 2006; and Sheet C-4 "Site Details" dated September 2006 prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 3. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans in a manner that would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal systems, building location, or, the approved use of the building, without prior review and written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 4. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (30) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 5. This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires and the municipality files a written request with the Secretary, the Secretary will remove the sewage allocation for this project Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-0442-2 IDX Systems Corporation Page 2 from the list of committed reserve capacity. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval and does not request that the Secretary remove the sewage allocation for this project from the list of committed reserve. Once the project is removed from the list of committed reserve capacity, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. 6. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction, and upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations. 7. The Division has relied solely upon the licensed designers certification that the design -related information submitted was true and correct, and complies with the Vermont Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules and the Vermont Water Supply Rules. WATER SUPPLY & WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 8. No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed wastewater system until the Secretary receives a certification from a designer or the installer, signed and dated, that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the wastewater system was installed in accordance with the permitted design and all permit conditions, was inspected, was properly tested, and has successfully met those performance tests." 9. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by the construction of a connection to the municipal wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the approved plans. The Wastewater Management Division shall allow no other method, or location of wastewater disposal without prior review and approval. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on November 14, 2006. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By h� Ernest stianson Regional Engineer C For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Act 250 District Environmental Commission #4 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety .o� VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation October 31, 2006 IDX Systems Corporation 40 IDX Drive P.O. Box 1040 South Burlington VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 RE: WW-4-0442-2, Cooling Tower Sewer Connections connect two cooling towers blowdown drains to municipal wastewater collection system, located at 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on October 27, 2006, including a fee of $734.40 paid by check #067057. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Wastewater Management Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Michael Katz 7),...:.....,1 f %4!r TR.,.- T-+ PD-+If1 /C,., ir, rTfi nl.l /C+ Tnk. ].. NOTICE OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL WHEREAS, IDX Systems Corporation (.Applicant. herein) received approval for an amendment to a previously approved planned unit development (#SD-05-41) from the South Burlington Development Review Board by written decision dated July 20, 2005. The amendment consists of Phase 11 to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 iDX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The amendment further consists of Phase III to include. 1) constructing four (4) story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Drive to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive, as depicted on a plan, entitled .IDX Systems Corp. Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT, Boundary Plat,. prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, dated December 15, 1998, last revised November 22. 2004, and recorded in Map Slide of the South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Development Review Board granted said approval subject to certain conditions as set forth in the final approval motion; NOW THEREFORE the Applicant hereby gives notice that the lands shown on the above -referenced plan, known as 35 Green Mountain Drive and 40 IDX Drive (collectively, the .Property.) are subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon Applicants Property, unless and until modified or removed by the South Burlington Development Review Board or its successor- 1 . Applicant agrees to construct, operate and maintain a 126 space parking lot on the 35 Green Mountain Drive parcel for the exclusive use and benefit of the office building complex located at 40 IDX Drive. This condition shall remain in full force and effect until Applicant receives a certificate of occupancy from the City of South Burlington for the 565 space parking structure to be built at 40 IDX Drive as part of Phase III of the IDX expansion project. 2. This Notice of Condition shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or any interest in the Property. 3. This Notice of Condition shall be binding upon the Applicant and the Applicant-s successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this IN THE PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. day of _- 2005. IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION Its Duly Authorized Agent At in said County, this day of 2005, _ Duly Authorized Agent of IDX Systems Corporation, personally appeared and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of IDX Systems Corporation. Before me, Notary Public son270.rea.wpd My Commission Expires: Page 1 of 1 Betsy McDonough From: David_Main@idx.com Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 4:16 PM To: emcdonough@sburl.corri Subject: DRB Meeting Minutes from July 19, 2056 Besry, Thank you for the copy of DRB Meeting Minutes from July 19,2005. We have one discrepancy with the Meeting Minute content with regard to the landscaping. The Board made it perfectly clear that we are not required or would need to post a landscaping bond for the existing landscaping or the proposed landscaping. Please make this correction to the minutes. Thanks, David David Main Construction & Space Planning Specialist IDX - Burlington, Vermont Building 25 GMD Tel. (802) 859-4148 Fax (802) 862-8098 IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION The contents of this e-mail and its attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e- mail, please notify IDX immediately (by return e-mail to either the sender or security@idx.com), destroy all copies of this message along with any attachments and do not disclose, copy and/or distribute the contents. The views expressed in this message are those of the author and not necessarily those of IDX. In the absence of a prior written agreement with you authorizing commitments of IDX via e-mail, the above message shall not bind IDX, unless from a duly authorized officer of the company in a context indicating an intention to bind the company. This e-mail and its attachments are protected by copyright and other laws. (c) IDX Systems Corporation 2005. All rights reserved. IDX is a registered trademark of IDX Investment Corporation. 8/19/2005 Impact Fee Calculation for New Non -Residential Construction A Project Name /,X B Effective Date - ')001s C D E F G H I J K L Type of use Type of construction Value of construction per square foot from Appendix 1 . 00 Total square feet of new construction Total value of new construction 3 f 16 E x F Above in units of $1,000 13, 310. 'N 2 G / 1000 60 Grand Gst Above in units of$1,000 f X/ 9( Y I / 1000 Total value of site and improvements after construction V J % G + I Above in units of $1,000 30 K / 1000 Existing land value�(�� ROAD IMPACT FEE M Base road impact fee per VTE N Estimated PM peak hour VTEs O Base road impact fee P Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-5) for past payments Q Credit for past payments R Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-6) for future payments S Credit for future payments T Total road impact fee FIRE PROTECTION FEE Estimated post construction value of structure and contents U in units of $1,000 V Base fire protection impact fee Credit per $1,000 of land value (J) for past tax payments W (Table FP-4) X Total credit applicable to project for past tax payments Post -construction value of structure and land excluding Y contents Z Above in units of$1,000 Credit per $1,000 of post -construction value for future tax AA pmts (Table FP-5) AB Total credit applicable to project for future tax payments AC Total fire protection impact fee TOTAL ROAD AND FIRE IMPACT FEE $144.56 0.3� MxN % I 5-4>•00 J x P b OU •.S L x R O-Q-S 10 Hx1.875 $0.87 x U From FP-4 WxJ G + I Y / 1,000 V•�S From FPh S _AA xZ V-X-AB A W o� �a 0 u, E � o x 0 O` O L (d 0 LL U a LL r` a� o z x 'U co LL :• Q a = o fZ 0 a ii Calculation slieets.xls October 20, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: IDX campus expansion Dear Ray: As a follow up to our conversation of last week, I have reviewed the scope of the first phase of construction and compared it to the total project for the purpose of establishing the phase 1 impact fees. The square footage of the project is 260,184 square feet. Phase 1 consists of 116,000 square feet and represents 45% of the total project. The sewer impact fee for the total project is $ 110,000.00, and the traffic impact fee is $ 64,500.00 Based on the above, I request the phase 1 sewer and traffic impact fees be established at $ 49,500.00 and $ 29025.00 respectively. Prior to having IDX issue these checks, I will contact you and verify your approval of this proposal. Thank You. Sincerely, Brad I Carter President cc: Ms. Michelle Russo, IDX Systems Corporation \ I 6 s COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS v S vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax assessment) Y units N f-,G) (4) TeTA-t FLOOR AREA AFTER / CONSTRUCTION Q�U s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2 ) COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (lj BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END $ 226.00 % vte (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) vte ( 3 ) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE�- (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 ( from line ( 3 ) of Form NR-1) units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE- CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND �1 (From Table ST-9) $ unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND//f (4) x (5) $ (�� (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-101 $ U / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND f� (From Table ST-11) $ I (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION 0 (From Table ST-12) $ (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN / unit $ % 5 YC> / unit UNITS OF $1,000 QQ ( From line ( 8 ) on Form NR-3 ) �� U• 3 y� units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) $ '� / unit (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) $_2 (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ �� / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) $ (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND �J (From Table ST-15) $ - / / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) $ (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ O (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) / unit u (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE _ (3) (15) - (17) -( (0( 19) -(21) 'iRM iR ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) ( 6 ) LAND VALUE 1c, (From current toords) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 9l7� �O s.f. $ 55 / s.f. /70b.3 y units F 3,01.)TTH 3 OF J "Ohl 11f G! 575 DORSET STREET SOUTHI BURLITNTGTOI"T, (802) 346-J106 FAkL7 (802) 846..4101 August 18, 2005 David Main IDX Systems, Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Main: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the minutes from the July 19, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 6f -o Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. oy �e DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 JULY 2905 2. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application #SD-04-55 of South Village Communities, LLC., for a planned unit development of Phase 1 of 150 residential units and a 100 student educational facility, of a 334 residential unit project, 1540 Spear Street: Mr. Dinklage asked if the Board can treat the 3-family units as a single family building and not require bike racks. Mr. Belair said they can; it will have to be a stipulation. Mr. Belair said staff feels they are not ready for a decision tonight. There was a list prepared by Brian Robertson for the applicant to address and this is still missing. Ms. LaRose added they also need to get comments on whether there is compliance between the Master Plan and Preliminary Plat. Ms. Quimby moved to contin«e to August. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4.�ontinued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-41 of iDX Systems Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of Phase 11 to include: 1) adding three floors to the west wing building containing 57,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 1DX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,359 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval, and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Please 111 to include. 1) constructing four story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 TDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 555 space parking structure at 40 1DX Drive to replace off -site parking a; 35 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Smichenko said there were 4 outstanding items: Stormwater compliance (for which they have a letter), The elevator size (they have checked with the Fire Dept. and submitted dimensions), Landscaping: $324,970 is required for the full project. Mr. Smichenko said they have already exceeded this amount and have drawings for another $50,000 in landscaping. There is a question as to whether the Board wants them to bond for what has been put in -2- r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 JUL Y 2005 or what is yet to be put in. Members agreed to delete Stipulation # 13. Fire Chief issues: Mr. Smichenko said they met with the Fire Chief and discussed the fire lane around the building. A fire truck came in and drove the route, and they were fine with what is proposed. Minor curve work will be done. The approval motion was amended to add the following conditions: The plans shall be revised to show the following: a) the plans shall be revised to a revised curb location per the Fire Chiefs request outlined in his letter dated 7/19/05 and shown on the Trudell Consulting Engineers sketch dated 6/23/05 presented at the meeting. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-41 subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Kupferman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-51 of Randall Hart. Request is for 1) three 1,061 sq. ft. footprint lots and 2) one 36,510 sq. ft. lot, 253 Shunpike Road: Mr. Henson said the one change from the earlier approval is to allow 3 units in the building to be sold as town houses instead of condos. The 3 owners will be members of a homeowners' association. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-51 of Randall Hart subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. '.Public Dearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-50 of The Snyder Company to amend a planned unit development consisting of 31 single family dwellings and One existing single family dwelling on 26.5 .acres. The amendment consists of landscaping revisions and driveway relocations, 1700 Spear Street: Mr. Snyder reviewed the surrounding properties. CITY OF SOUTH BUR L1INGTON DEPARTMENT OF P LAi dMNG & ZONEIvJG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOINT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 21, 2005 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corp. P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-05-41 Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on July 19, 2005 (effective 7/20/05). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by io/i8/o5) of this approval or this approval is null and void. Also, I am in receipt of you fax dated July 14, 2005 regarding the June 7, 2005 Development Review Board minutes. I have attached your fax to the minutes that are kept in the IDX document file in the Planning and Zoning Department. The minutes were approved as is, thus they cannot be changed. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc n ugh, Pl nning & Zonin sistant Encl. IDX Systems Corp DRB Meeting, July 19, 2005 Landscaping Requirement All Phases $324,970 Revised IDX Planting Cost (Phase 1) ($326,536) Proposed Phase II and III Budget ($49,155) Amount Remaining (Overage) ($50,721) IDX will work with Planning and Zoning to Confirm Revised Number meets Landscaping Requirements IDX Systems Corp DRB Meeting, July 19, 2005 Landscaping Cost for Parking Lot behind 100 Building $15,410 Landscaping Cost for Parking Garage Area $20,550 35 GMD Parking Lot $13,195 Total $49,155 Note - No retaining wall cost in estimate South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-411.0 July 19, 2005 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: IDX, IDX Drive Dear Juli: This letter is a follow-up to my letter dated June 2, 2005 relative to the proposed construction projects at IDX Corporation. On June 24, 2005 I met with IDX representatives David Main and Peter Smisanko. The purpose of the meeting was to clarify items 6 and 7 as listed in my original letter. They provided me with drawings and an on -site walk through of the proposed changes. The drawings they gave me showed how several of my concerns would be addressed by making some changes to the layout of their property and the parking lot and building access. They also asked me if it would be possible for me to relax the requirement for up close parking spaces. After a full discussion of both sides of these issues I am comfortable that what they are proposing to address my concerns is acceptable. Therefore, at this time I will allow them to keep the up close parking spots as designed. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. ncerely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief JOB IDX TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Boot 308 478 Blair Park Road WgUtOR VT O54g5 SHEET NO. 2 98051CLC40—SB—FIRE DWG DRAWN BY SM T DATE 06123105 CHECKED BY DAB DATE 0612JI05 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING ' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: July 15, 2005 \drb\sub\idx\final.doc Plans received: May 10, 2005 IDX - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT APLICATION #SD-05-41 Meeting Date: July 19, 2005 Owner/Applicant Propertir Information IDX Systems Corporation Tax Parcels 0915-00040-C and 0720-00035-C 40 IDX Drive Commercial 2 (C2) Zoning District; Traffic Overlay So. Burlington, VT 05403 District - Zone 3; Bartlett Brook Overlay District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc IDX Systems Corp., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of Phase II to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Phase III to include: 1) constructing four (4) story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Drive to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The applicant received final plat approval for the proposed project from the Planning Commission on February 9, 1999 (decision enclosed). However, the entire project was not constructed and therefore the approval lapsed for the unfinished portion of the project. This application is essentially for re -approval of the same project. The Development Review Board granted the applicant preliminary plat approval for the proposed project on April 5, 2005 (minutes enclosed). The applicant appeared before the Development Review Board on June 7, 2005 for final plat application and was continued to July 19, 2005 to provide the applicant an opportunity to meet with the Fire Chief to resolve a parking issue. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 10, 2005 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. 40 IDX Drive 1_ C2 Zoning District F � Min. Lot_Size _ Max. Building Coverage Max. Overall Coverage_ �l Min. Front Setback �l M Side ii de Setback Required ILoposed 40,000 SF 40% 70% 30 ft. 10 ft. ]� 713,985 SF� 23% 65% >30_ft. > 10 ft Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. _ 4 Max. Building Heiii ht _ 40 ft. 71_5 ft. 4 zoning compliance 4 waiver required pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations n/a not applicable because parking lots are not subject to setback requirements Table 2. 35 Green Mountain Drive C2_Zoning District 4 Min. Lot Size Max. Building Covera e Required 11 40,000 SF I _40% Proposed 71,098 SF 0% �l Max. Overall Coverage 70% 1 _ 61 % �l Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a ___ �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc �l Min. Rear Setback 30 ftn/a PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations requires that the PUD meet the standards of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. 1. Stormwater drainage plans shall comply with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, pursuant to Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations. Both of the subject properties fall within the Bartlett Brook Watershed Overlay District. Thus, the proposed project shall be in compliance with Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant submitted the applicable information regarding the development and stormwater system to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. The City of South Burlington Water Department Superintendent, Jay Nadeau, reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated April 4, 2005 (attached). The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated March 24, 2005. 3. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Water Department Superintendent, as outlined in his letter dated April 4, 2005. 4. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation approval for the additional required capacity from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final plat plan approval. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc; (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to the property at 40 IDX Drive is currently provided via a 24' wide curb -cut and a 34' wide curb -cut off of IDX Drive, and a 28' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. Access to the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive is currently provided via an 18' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. No changes to access are proposed for either property. These are sufficient means of access for the project. Circulation, on the properties appears to be adequate. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy. and any unique natural features on the site. There do not appear to be any wetlands on either of the subject properties, but they do fall within the Bartlett Brook Overlay District. The applicant submitted the applicable information regarding the development and stormwater system to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's storrwater hydrology computer model. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the stated purpose of the C2 Zoning District (� Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels andlor stream buffer areas. Open space on the property is sufficient. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Department has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated June 2, 2005 (attached). The applicant had expressed disagreement with recornmendation numbered 7, regarding the parking near the building and, since the June 7 meeting, has worked with the South Burlington Fire Department to mitigate this issue. The applicant has informed staff that an agreement was reached that would eliminate the need to remove any parking spaces. However, the Fire Chief is unavailable for official comment on this issue until July 18, 2005. Revised comments reflecting the Department's standing on this issue are expected to be available at the July 19 meeting. Until such time, staff retains the stipulation that the applicant adheres to the June 2, 2005 recommendations of the South Burlington Fire Department. 6. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the South Burlington Fire Department as stated in the letter dated June 2, 2005. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMEN I- OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concerns regarding the above -mentioned criteria. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concerns regarding the above -mentioned criteria. (i) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive flan for the affected district(s). Staff feels that the proposed project is in compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE FLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development R_egulations1 any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site does provide for adequate planting and safe pedestrian movement According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed expansion requires a minimum 530 parking spaces. All of the buildings on the subject property, including the proposed and existing buildings, require a minimum of 1,346 parking spaces. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, Phase 1 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new second phase" in the application) will require 305 parking spaces, for a total of 1,050 parking spaces. A total of 305 parking spaces are proposed for Phase 1, for a total of 1,037 parking spaces. Phase 2 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new third phase" in the application) requires a minimum of 225 parking spaces. A parking structure containing 565 parking spaces is proposed for this phase. However, phase 2 construction will eliminate 164 existing parking spaces, so the net increase will be 376 parking spaces. In total, the applicant is proposing 1,273 parking spaces, which will require a 73 space, 5.4%. parking waiver. The Development Review Board has the authority to grant this waiver pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. The parking calculations for the proposed project include the 126-space parking area that will be constructed on the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The off -site parking area is within 800 linear feet of the property at 40 IDX Drive, so the Development Review Board has the authority to approve this parking layout, pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations. 7. Pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall record appropriate legal documents to ensure that the off -site parking spaces shall be available for the intended user, prior to recording of the final plat plans. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\finai.doc (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Most of the parking on the property at 40 IDX Drive is in existence. The proposed parking on this property is located to the rear of the existing and proposed building, in relation to Shelburne Road. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The maximum height of proposed structure is 71.5' above average pre -construction grade. Thus the applicant is seeking a height waiver of 36.5', which the Development Review Board may grant pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 8. Pursuant to Section 15 13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DIED shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed building elevation plans have been submitted. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Proposed building elevation plans have been submitted. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Requlations: Y (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require the reservation of land to provide access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The dumpsters on the subject property are existing and are adequately enclosed. (d) Lighting The applicant submitted lighting point -by -point plans for the properties at 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. The proposed lighting -levels are in compliance with Appendix A of the Land Development Regulations. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. (e) Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. The applicant submitted a landscape plan and landscape budget, in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape budget separates the proposed plantings into three (3) phases (attached). The minimum landscaping requirement for all three phases, based on building costs, is $324,970. The applicant has completed $235,889 as part of the first phase, leaving $89,081 to be completed. The applicant has proposed $49,155 for the plantings of additional trees and shrubs, leaving a shortfall of $39,926. The applicant had previously proposed the installation of a $165,000 retaining wall to meet a part of their landscaping budget. The board continued the application on June 7, 2005 so that the applicant could gather more information on this wall given the substantial amount of hardscaping the applicant was proposing as part of their budget. The applicant would still like to erect the wall but now requests that only $40,000 of the $165,000 cost be considered towards landscaping. Per Section 13.06(G)(3), the board may allow for site improvements other than tree planting as long as the objectives of the landscaping ordinances are met. Staff has asked the applicant to provide a description of the proposed wall material, as well as a statement that at least part of its use will be as a landscaping feature and not entirely for engineering. Staff recommends that the City Arborist review the plans and attest to its landscaping significance. The applicant has noted that they will provide something to the board at the hearing. The board should consider this request at the hearing. The City Arborist reviewed the initial landscaping plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 9. The applicant shall provide a detailed description of the proposed retaining wall. The wall shall serve a function of landscaping at a level agreeable to the City Arborist. 10. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Arborist, as outlined in his memorandum dated March 24, 2005. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans depict adequate snow storage areas for both properties. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc (0 Traffic According to the ITE, 71h Edition (Land Use Code 710), the proposed expansion is estimated to generate and additional 225.38 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The existing buildings are estimated to generate 347.37 P.M. peak -hour vtes. Thus the property in its entirety is estimated to generate 572.75 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The property is located within the Traffic Overlay District — Zone 3, so it may generate a total of 803.23 peak -hour vtes. The applicant submitted a traffic study with the original application for the IDX expansion project. During the sketch plan review of the current application, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant's traffic engineer review the traffic study to ensure that its recommendations are still applicable to the project. The applicant's traffic engineer reviewed this study and provided comments in a memorandum dated October 18, 2004 (attached). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-05-41, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, a Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Peter Smichenko, applicant JUL. 15. ZO 5 8:51Ht1 I D X 5 Bi_RLIf1GTOHS0 HO.818 =.1 laking a Differer�oe in IHcaOthcsee- ■ IDX 5ys,er�s Cr)rpora* on 40 IDX. Drive toi 802,F1:2.' 722 Flo 5W.1,C73 fix SO2,SF2.6848 Bir'inrgtcn, b : rUC2 url �,rww -Ox.co n July 14, ? 005 VL,k FAX: 802-846-4101 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant City of South BurlhWon DeDart Ment of Planning & Zvniog 5'S Dorser, Street. South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: June 7, 2005 Development Review Board Mleeting Minutes Dear Ms: lE''lcDcnough: We received your leter dated July 11, 2005, with the meetingminutes for the June 7, 2005 Development Review Beard ("DRD") meeting and would like to offer the followitig corrections and additional information: I- 'The >42inutes reflect a 6-story parldng deck with 3 levels of existing structured parking. IDX has no structured parking at the present time and will. be constructing the 3-story parldiig garage during the last phase of the project. 2. To accommodate a fell -la igth stretcher, the South Burlington Fire Deparmamit has determined that the interior cab length should be, at a minims am, 70". DX has 2 existing elevator cabs serving the existing 3 floors that are approximately 'r' 10'° x 5' 9". IDX will extend the shafts to service the 3 new floors of the 6-story completed building_ 3. We believe that we satisfied the Fire Department's concean regarding the additional fire Lane around the building and that this requirement can be removed from the approval stipulations. 4. The DRB was concerned that the project meet all of the City's storrnwater requirements. 1Heindel and Noyes has stated in letters to the Planning & Zoning Department that both 40 IDX drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive are designed comistent with City requirements. 5. We ix ill provide a reconciliation of our project and actual landscaping costs to Mr. Belair prior to the meeting for his review. We believe that the retaining wall has landscaping value because it allows us to preserve the maximum arnount of natural vegetation. The a?ternative is to clear the larger area and provide a gentler Bade. Sincerely. Peter Smichenko Sr. Direc-ior, Corporate Services and Facilities SDa-018u r1'i r6 bk, C I.1-j 19+'bans� Cammen,h I I (e , IDX Planting Plan Phase II 3/24/05 Trudell Consulting Engineers 1. Tree Planting Details should be included with the plans 2. Tree species for the parking lot islands and green belts are acceptable. Continuous planting pits using a high quality top soil are recommended unless the existing soils are adequate to support healthy, vigorous tree growth 3. Green Ash is not recommended due to over planting in South Burlington 4. Littleleaf Linden is an unacceptable for street tree use due to over planting is South Burlington 5. Pin Oak should only be planted if soil test results indicate a soil pH lower than 7.0 to prevent the likelihood of iron deficiency 6. I'd recommend the use of trees with a narrower crown spread along the south side of the parking structure. Pin Oak and `Autumn Blaze' Freeman Maple have mature crown spreads of 45-50 feet and will require frequent pruning to provide clearance from the building '3 'v.✓ I N C 26.'*ttt ltc 1.....`'i yl) %I t, N'i t1''1`. 1': 18 October, 2004 Mr. Peter Smichenko IDX, Corp. 25 Green Mountain Dr South Burhngton, VT 05403 Dear Mr Smichenko, At your request, we have reviewed our 30 June, 1999 traffic impact study to determine whether its findings are still valid, despite the delay in construction of Phase II of IDX's expansion project. To assess whether the conclusions in our study are still valid we have evaluated several important assumptions and whether the basis for those assumptions have significantly changed. These are summarized in the following table: ASSUMPTION CHANGE SINCE 1999 Expected employment No significant changes to the projections have been made Access and Egress Points There have been no changes to the proposed plan. The Shelburne Road Improvements are currently under construction. Traffic Volumes on US 7 The 1999 traffic study assumed a 1.3% per year growth rate. The latest information from VTrans at Automatic Traffic Recorder Station D431, just south of Green Mountain Drive, shows that the average daily traffic declined from 24,900 in 1998 to 22,700 in 2002. The VTrans counts in 2002 were made prior to the start of construction of the US 7 improvements. Safety The 0.3 mile section north of Green Mountain Drive was a High Accident Location in 1998, with an actual to critical ratio of 1.131. The latest VTrans crash data from 1998 to 2002 shows an actual to critical ratio of 1.052. This represents a 7% decline. The Shelburne Road improvements currently under construction are expected to significantly lower the crash rate in this segment. Mitigation Measures The 1999 traffic study recommended optimizing signal timings when IDX reaches full capacity. No changes are made to that recommendation. 331 01colt Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 r r ,. 802.295 4999 • ... x 802 ,295.1006 m wvvvv.rvcJinc Mr. Peter Smichenko 18 October, 2004 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 I conclude that there have been no changes to the assumptions used in our 1999 traffic study that would a affect our mitigation recommendations or our conclusion that the project will no cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding streets and highways. Sincerely, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Kenneth Kaliski, P.E. Director of Environmental Services Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4io6 CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS IDX Green Mountain Drive 03/24/05 i. The entrance drives from Green Mountain Drive will carry a large volume of traffic. They may be constructed as intersecting streets with sidewalk not constructed through them but ramped each side to the curb radii. 2. Typical details should include a handicap sidewalk ramp typical. SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 April 4, 2005 Trudell Consulting Engineers Ms. Deborah Bell PO Box 308 Vdilliston, VT 05495 RE: IDX South Burlington Dear Deborah: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As this project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. Please add the following wording to future plans in visible locations: "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1 and the Village of Jericho", henceforth the "CWD Specification." All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 4. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 5. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. S. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 7. You have indicated that the proposed building at 200 IDX Drive will be served from the existing six-inch water stub. A new water meter shall be required for this addition based upon the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water Allocation request in number one above. If there is to be any water service to the proposed parking garage the Water Allocation application should include that buildings expected water demand as well as that for the proposed building addition. Meter size will also be determined by the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water, Allocation request. S. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 9. The SBVATD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 10. The SBWD shall be notified prior to back -filling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 11. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 12. A hard copy set of As-Buihs as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent Enc. CC. Brian Robertson Doug Brent Plan Reviews: IDX Addition 4-05 South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-846-4110 June 2, 2005 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: IDX, IDX Drive Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed new construction at IDX of Shelburne Road. I have also made a site visit to the present complex and looked over the phased plans as presented. Given that, I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Division of Fire Safety. 3. Prior to final approval I must review the plans which show actual location of any standpipes. 4. Prior to final approval I must review the plans which show actual location of corridor fire doors and stairwells. 5. Before final approval I request that I be shown building elevations in case I have additional comments or requirements. 6. Turning radii and road widths within this property should be sized to allow for parking, set-up and operation fire apparatus. 7. Once the three story building becomes a 6 story building, all parking adjacent to the building should be eliminated due to set up of aerial ladders for rescue and firefighting purposes. By this I mean the rows of parking closest to the building on all 3 open sides. Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date pagoes" p2 ° I Fr Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # Page — 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which could be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire Safety. me. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact rely, Douglas S. Brent Fire Chief DEVEL.,DPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 JUNE 2005 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-42 of BSZ, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of 210 residential units, a 61 room hotel, a 20,000 sq ft movie theater building (1000 seats), a 22,500 sq ft restaurant/medical office/personal instruction school building, a 3500 sq ft restaurant with drive -through service, and a band with drive -through service. The amendment consists of changing the use of 3750 sq ft of medical office use in the 22,500 sq ft building to indoor recreation use, 7 Fayette Road: Mr. Dinklage questioned whether the change in use will require any different lire protection. Mr. Rochford said not that he knows of. Mr. Belair noted this building is part of a commercial complex. There was a parking reduction granted due to a shared parking arrangement. With the change in use, this will be revised. There is no problem with this change. Mr. Rochford said their busiest time is 6-9 a.m. Ms. Quimbv moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-42 of BSZ, Inc.. subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-41 of IDX Systems Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of Phase 11 to include: 1) adding three floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq ft of general office use, and constructing 179 new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq ft building, off -site parking approval and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Phase III to include: 1) constructing four story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq ft of general office use at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Drive to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Frader said this project was approved in 1999 as a 3-phase development. Phase 2 was to be a parking structure, and phase 3 was to be the west wing. This application renews the prior approvals (part of the project has been built). This application differs from the prior approval in that there is additional surface parking, and the parking deck will be to the full 6 levels (3 are built) when the last wing is added. A stipulation was added that elevators will serve all floors and will be able to handle a stretcher at full length. Mr. Belair noted this application requires an additional 60-space parking waiver. -4- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 7 JUNE 2005 Members questioned the Fire Chief s request that there be no parking near the 6-story building. The applicant wanted time to think about this. Mr. Kupferman asked about stormwater control. The applicant said a submission has been made to the City on that, and they do not yet know the city's response. Mr. Belair will check on this. A question was raised as to whether the retaining wall is to be counted as landscaping. Mr. Belair noted they are $6500 short in landscaping. Mr. Dinklage felt the wall allows for the expansion of parking; it does not beautify the area. Members wanted more detail on the wall, including final design and when it will be built. Ms. Quimby then moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-05-41 until 19 July 2005. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. .Site Plan Application 4SP-05-21 of Burlington International Airport to install a 20,000 gallon above -;round fuel tams, Valley Road: Mr. Baccigalupo said the tank will go next to existing tanks. The question of landscaping was raised. Mr Baccigalupo said screening is an issue because of FAA regulations. Mr. Dinklage said staff recommends landscaping elsewhere on the Airport property. Mr. Baccigalupo suggested "banking" it for later use. Mr. Belair said the Board has never done that. The applicant agreed to workout $2100 worth of landscaping on the Airport site. Ms. Qumby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-05-21 of Burlington International Airport subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Site Plan Application #SP-05-22 of Burlington International Airport to expand the existing 25,180 sq ft airport ternainaal b9.ailding by 9,475 sq ft for a total of 34,655 sq ft, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. McEwing noted the square footages are wrong: the existing is 111,985, and the addition is 9425 for a total of 121,410 sq. ft. This is the final phase of development at the north end of the Airport. Passengers won't have to walk on the tarmac to get to any planes. Mr. McEwing showed what is already built and what will be constructed. He also showed the location of a retaining wall all the way to the FAA building instead of a chain link fence. It was noted that the wall fulfills landscaping requirements as it provides screening. -5- • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers Heindel and Noyes • Environmental Scientists H N PO Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 June 23, 2005 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: North Brook Hydrologic Modeling for 35 Green Mountain Drive 10MMITENSM2 In As requested, we have examined the proposed modification at 35 Green Mountain Drive. This modification involves the conversion of an existing office building and associated parking into an employee parking lot as detailed on the Site Plans submitted by Trudell Consulting Engineers (dated January 3, 2005). As part of the modification, the impervious area will be reduced by 1,249 sq. ft. This will reduce the post -modification flows to below the existing flows. The new employee parking lot will improve on water quality with 37 % of the impervious area sheet flowing to a grassed swale prior to discharging to a catch basin system connected to the City system. We find that the proposed modification is consistent with the Bartlett Brook stormwater zoning overlay, and we recommend that the City approve the stormwater aspects of the redevelopment at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Please contact me at 802-658-0820 ext. 43 or mmoir@q-city.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, c Megan J. Moir Staff Scientist cc: Debra A. Bell, Trudell Consulting UAPROJECTS\BartlettBrk\IDX_35 Green Mtn Dr_renewal\IDX letter to Ray Belair.doc ' - a ling Hydrogeologisls - Engineers Heindel and Noyes - Environmental Scientists H N PO Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 June 23, 2005 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: North Brook Hydrologic Modeling for 40 IDX Drive Expansion: Re -approval Dear Mr. Belair: As requested, we have re-examined the proposed expansion at 40 IDX Drive. This project was originally reviewed in detail by our office in April 1999. The inclusion of the proposed project in the North Brook Stormwater model was discussed in the report we submitted to your office on April 26, 1999. We have reviewed the current site plan (dated January 10, 2005) and the accompanying storm calculations and have found no changes to the site plan or to the stormwater infrastructure that would alter the conclusions of our previous report. The expansion of the pond system on -site continues to adequately reduce the post - expansion construction flows to below the existing flows. We continue to find that the proposed development is consistent with the Bartlett Brook stormwater zoning overlay, and we recommend that the City re -approve the stormwater aspects of this project. Please contact me at 802-658-0820 ext. 43 or mmoir@q-city.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mega J. Moir Staff Scientist cc: Debra A. Bell, Trudell Consulting UAPROJECTS\BartlettBrk\IDX_35 Green Mtn Dr_renewal\IDX_letter to Ray Belair.doc NT UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT EXISTING CHART a PN LINK FENCE _ SI4'a4bFe' \�.. '-,- .-..•...•- ^\\ TOE POINT EL 221.13 -4-4111-1 �. \t TCE PORT JB� IVTA EL 210.47 OINT 1 AF N,T MEADDYODD ENTERPRISES, tPA l R4' I I/-- k k 94STALL SILT SACKS FOR \ EROSION CONTROL DURING y CONSTRUCTION N ALL ON -SITE CATCH BASINS NEW AND EXISTING Da 2/O.OS M206.St T AF 0 I x. I ! 9NOLLQf E D J OT I : AF IE I As ® F •' as k Y� [ M d••��! 1 I+ � l ir- w9, / / I E � k ! 1 1 lO N/� GMP REAL ESTATE CORP. D �w, B� A WATERR MAN W __ CB _ .3 •`'' �.{�a .ati � : .:� , -Q-GREP------ r-202.J8 STAMM 1-39,08 B In CONSTRUCTION B' AG SEVER 1-198.88 12 M ENTRANCE i-198.78 -, S____________ X ____-_________ s. GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE �--15' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT NOTES 7. OWNER: IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION P.O. BOX 1070 SOUTH 0- BURLINGTON, VT 402 2. ZONING COMMERCIAL 2 J. TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 1.63 ACRES / 71,0984/ 4. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED EXISTING PROPOSED 7OX 610% / 44,7770 BO.JX / 415284N 5 FRONT YARD SETBACK COVERAGE: TOTAL FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA - 6,754.8 eN FRONT YARD SETBACK IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWABLE JOX - 2206.44 XF FRONT YARD SETBACK IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING: 38.9X - 2,628.59 of FRONT YARD SETBACK IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED: 10.7X - 722.75 �/ 6. THIS PUN SNOWS EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTIURES BASED ON ABOVE GROUND OBSERVATIONS AND RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT THE ACTUAL LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY U71UTY MAY VARY FROM THAT SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT ING SAFE' TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND U77UTY BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UDUTIES AS SHOWN AND AS FOUND. 7 P wKIN - SPA S PRO DEn. 128 SPACE'S GwrdCP MP-22-1-0-25OIH- -BRP '250- T- V. Post-fw mounted semi-ppner- IPemnee ny m ,P �ptDen fed pp Uc_ MerP aPtI- Iu-RRP-Hw ha, Tw, 19, ft f p—n Painted' lamas N' Plea p. Ga PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN TI_T_Y SIZE COMMENTS ® AF ACER X FREEMANX 'AUTUMN BLAZE' AUTUMN BLAZE FREEMAN MAPLE ID 2 1/2- - J' B A B OGr GLED179A IMACANTHOS INERBS THORNLESS HONEYLOCUST e 2 1/2- - r B A B �0V. MA MALUs 'AD-s- AOAMS CRABAPPLE 5 1 1/4' - 1 1/i' B A B, HEAVY y UMI MATS NIGRA AUSTRIAN MINE 5 6' - r B A B PRaPa9® IA1m PA1anNc i �'°' fi f 3 p, s. R � p�■F r 1 1 �an1 N 3� / ., � • tax srsT s caRP. X,s . :... O - - 1 Al' I_~ . SNOW AREA \ ., // I % EXTEND SV-T FENCE BEYCW EXISTING SWIALE NY LAWN `'7�^\}L10—'GN.P.G EASEANFNti<. ,,•� i4 / - / ESTALS PE NE _ CONCRE ITE � r-201.CO _� _ VAULT I!-f9aO B 10 (2) i-197.0 121. \•� rh ,9--------------C________________ _B 12' x Je' EASEMENT 11-200AT / l-196.87 18 Pw-196.91 L --1H _GYP _-/--_________ _____ C6 i=194.66]6 N II `i4 I I GrapfUc Scale I Feet _-..,r- 1 `-----� 20 O 20 40 60 80 i i LEGEND WATER MAINS AND SERVICES GAS MAIN ---------------------- STORM DRAINAGE --------- 9--------__ p TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS ----.-_lYt----._. ,v PAVED DRIVE OR ROAD CRAVED. DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ---------- EASEMENTS -__-._-._-___.__._- FENCE --------- --__—_ I-- STORM DRAINAGE (DNH) MANHOLE CATCH BASIN (CB) n VAL MTC OR TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTALtA L9NANE VE RFc 4Y 104- F@ v Q. i 'a N 6 TR.UDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (1"CE) 478 HYt PXIk bad P.0. HnK 308 (B02) 879-Qi31lplXar) N7Wu4 Wnmlt 05495 IaDZi 879-0060(�d N7it W m the TEleb 4t Www.lYudeeC011witllgmm CONQlI11AL ARWOVAL 511N61]ON XaRJNNAIY ARIWAL SleM690N ACT Y!O 4■Mtt.YpN TNAL APPWONAL ADM690N CONSialCIION WAV119/Cb u. OwY,pa PI.. Pv.Fw M�aM m..iar.w YAaI PEo..a 4` • a 11 h Wa oeapko Da99 y T1Avlr,ar ��V6 toF 1VEUa,Y//A� EEmr,m Ste`: 'rMnl�ifTiutc�N��\ h.jectn" IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont �� Site Plan DralMla Ti„11bA:: 96D31-101 EXLeu10Xl: 6 PTOkeQ --M-: DAB D1aNX1: SALT Date: :-o.T-zoos F.B. 206 Snk: ,' = za' PIOkOCt lPbtllOa, xxx X-Rd: 9BosldEJs BaY51 File XXN SPI STORM DRAIN STUB _ - \ I a.w 7ATm+vu\Es -- J i r 217.08 CEI CHAIN LINK 1 I-20B.97 BUll1NNC - FAKE_ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FtlSTNG B' A.C. I i TELEPHONE I /*ATER LINE MAN i E795TWC "' -.... _,. •' STUB i \ - SiWEYf STUB NTC /I I EMOTING i' CO!!� R4lE CURB / = CB DRIYEWA _ Y ""B/q CLASS 1 ' EAD"OP'PXVi� ' ' .... h311.3J URB (.-z1a7o \, ' 216.64 I WA YER Gl 8' A.C. YAW 1 1 VALVE / �211.2J I y N r-21I.IIN .._.-�!-•" , 1S CURB A.C. _______' S _____/ .,�ezo9.6o / 4' PVC UNOERORAIN 1 i-in.1i7 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE ! ---------- ----- ------ -- __-�___ -- - •-- �-`------7� ---- w T ------� - -- ------i -- - ---------_ - A T ... 1 ! \' DB N r-27.22 I : \j t t t l ! // �111j , •. -, J2J l\ y 13 VC/SOR.STdt�1 W1A'N ._J.. �•'_-__--__NYDR.1%Ii'f- .�i'" .-•' I �._ _ / �I.09 ,(//,,'``.%%.v I _ - \ { i tt, ( Il ail i % ' � .'�~ \ 1'2WtM2 aia �\/ /• _ / \r' •" _--' r - --i" sTu_._ I \\\\ tillTG 1a iR 5£ARNEff. ...5�- _ �\._.,-"^`~ 1 /" t. \; 1�31t �3W71 ! %!�Xh!➢� 11 _ r\�// w•..._- ,�` _-..G...__'� a \ \ \ { 1 IINOEROT ! .�-- - _- �._ 1 .34C ! t i-• ..,/ t yam.__ _ / !I r''iJ 1111 I- b \ ._._ ". •� / '" f:-CANCRCE0-DR/J I%4Lt- �- - - _ ^ 1 IV I / / -' _.IMa'Cg9CRE -__. _^" - i`.4.6-` r 'i��t�E105T61D.LWR1:- _._ ^�;.•'' �``.'' !!� \\`" ��' �..-'�'., I ; HM1T,gA%!r / / ." ...-••'' ��"�.._��-�teua.SB. iw„ I '� •.J J / ,. .." �.� .._.1-aut.784.15- - i I Ft � � / �`.,.. - ! I ! I it j /r ,.��' - _ - `\,�_ -.. '•.�_' NIIrL?rBciJ /! .tat'.a+Taie6 `.`. / •/ .` \\ ! !� 1 � t J 9 S[IAER //� �/' ` 'i °"!e6 _-�- j 1. v s:rwib" jil � .- wH- .. .. ,+ � / / \ - +I 9i_1.31="Qu-al I11 �' '-•�zo6T4 �-- � _may, � ' /....�.�, B2.RY'+- - �._-,- ,. _.... - -',. _. _-•'1 \ \tl _ 'i ! ,}/ ----- // it { I< R-lee.a �... _. _ _ -' \ t\ \\� 1 r I !^._ CURB TE 9.57 yt\t\ �1 / / ! jlll I �, \ ll/r' •,: A``_��__ - '�'/� \�' I 'I1 i' lil ! I ( S P �• LEPEONE \ I / ! I 11 I 13 �i i l r _ _.._ _. .. ..•_.. • j \ /' r { Tj5 t PEDESTAL 1�f 1 III Irvi \ ril �r101W / JS ` i ( ' YARDDR ._-_.. -_. _.. _. _._-.._r-__._._ \\�• IlJ I h190. 4 CB "� ti. \ {-' r-187.74 CS' ! ( 1 { 1 , r l r ✓a'-�" •�'�92,es ! -a J�: 1 r- 179.78 I In6'-17150 12•NppE ,\ wwwuRE' j ! MERE - Win+/"r ? .1 \ I In t-11 11I= t5 PYC \\ ' (TYPICAL)-_- / 111 \ / ....,f` VIER NH l /--/ 1( !) ' �, CUR `++1 '(J'4/,'.U� ��l u CQV(X7ElE PA05 r-/81b I T.1B6.b IL1(I `i/-- .GENERATOR PAD I ,2 N-17R77 1 1 M-192.64 1 I ', I� f/ CB - ,aa _ �,6%' _ B PV4•T • _! - \ CB '-TIBT.BIBS 112 h-179.6B I i 1 our-1825BI ✓', ,a !-r9a.f71� - 4'P `` Y I , , Ip I CB ^ �, -4@#-.3dF- - i Ol 6' P r' 4• aVC .-,L•+-7 - \ (P 1 d.%' ! COALING -_=-.._____ - ---- � 'a - te5.65 i-ie&si � '. _ .�, cBlee.b roWER � ... ... -- _ - _ - ----- -=i I = -- i-teo.19 - - _ - - r-IB246 e'vT•c ++` H Y I � / 6' ALX i "� • +"pV0\; 4'PVC' • �CB CB 6" PMC -_ r WATER VALVE ! I 1 MANHOLE •SIEEYE f811J 779.97 '! B' _------__ "5 ----'---E' \ 1 N GENERATOR h179.1J 1-176.00 _ �' 7P y I I I SEWER MN 1 1 i al1 9 Co a - _ L______ _ ____W __- e" 1-173.42 la2.92 fB -184.03 r-1B2BJ T"ly 1- 73.55 EIECilfll'Ai I , - __ l f �;.i-=32 1BA86 h1788J ```6'. I T �TEEVE y / 1 CB YARD DRAW I ; I II POWER POLE GOGo 1-179.17 r-1"16 HYDRANT 186.36 YARD OItAN -VIER NE � ,CGNMIE WALL c� h186. 6 I-178" DRAINETAINING WALL Co.ce . n9.n r- t7894 I f / \ ; �1Y 71 �/ /.,i W00 DX D6M I B' 1 -17"7 1 B' Y- 17.147 72• PVC ; 11 / 1 _ HYDRANT IEF WIiO 6' PYC \+ 16' out-175.57 1 13' In- 174.14 1 1 �I II M cmB OR C13 YARD DRAIN 1Ba64 I 1' I OVERHEAD POWER •/4 C 1--184.74 o, N�J1/X 1 IS' M- 172.74 �• 1 I OAS IJpt' ' r-IB1.a3 1n.t7 - - - +` . Boo 61X Btl9B 1 x-176.09 1-17861 f 10' YI-17142 -� =r �' ME -a" 1 aut- 172.38 �p i out-17129 r « D 1 10' ti-17142 ,� C.a \iM • VAULT ! TRANSFORMER RETABBNO WALL 1 CB 113' h-17107 PQAC++..i! I I 1 %77.JB I / ., 1 15•-t-17102 `�• C•0• --- 1 12• b-f682B 'CO. �L` 4 q � CB CB YARD CR S70RY NH y � I � ` 168.28 ,` .: 179. CB172J8 F-17212 17211 1-17177 --� - 1 { 11 1 16' i1-167.53 6' P��SEMER 1tiYAR79.441 I-17J.84 _1T "C !`! 1 I 1 IS' b-18Z3J j S-- 9 h169.04 h10832 a16861 , i • !.! I I / `, $ I fe' elrt-rB75] v'/� 1 ' ii Sh' Ga vosaLEs . I _ 1'w _i= _ i2_Pic �:+• \ , EGE l A SNH ri ni 4QN T'-" ,�' EHD p i_~!V__I__--I 1 • Il t CB177.JtT O,/ r-177.49 I II A P,:. 3{ ( CURB P I I h/7I.0 unum SYMBOLS h17749 ; ' I 0J CO1& 1. g . 9 h SIDEWALK 1 1 1 j ! UTILITIES SEWER MANHOLE O _____+ Vd L j � NING 1 j 6 b\ I ` / HYDRANT SEVER YAMS STORE DRAINAGE p `` SEWERS I `I 5' CONCRETE I� .1,.y/ SEWER MH AND SERVICES S MANHOLE 1 ''i% ON CO. \ 1 - 1-16706 1 Y I i 111-65.21 WATER MAINS _ W cLEANouT o 61.b 1 PNC .......``` !l Qf+ �e +`\ 1 I I 'T 6'h 16SJ7 AND SERWCES h/7&80 i 1 1 --.-- _ 4 1 Ie b 6 1 y- y 1 1 II STORM DRAINAGE -SD- CATCH BASIN ❑ v" ` HIIIRANT �� - _ _y__ __ _ _ _ _ I �� li UNDERDRAIN -UD- plliEi OR > 16t.38 I I h6 . CONgtETE 1).� / \ 1 , I 1 END SECTION i-178J7 ' CURB (TYPJ `.` \ 8 .T / \ 1 1 1 ROOF DRAIN -RD- VAL 1E oa i N AN \ ,�I = % ,-r P`F STORM DRAM 8' W 4w SERVICE -.. C.O., 4 A -G- FIRE HYDRANT , I uPz-- CONCR ETE' SIDEIYAIK `` CB STUB f-1 C \ j I II OR NATURAL CAS CO. _ 1L74 'a 6 � �i �� WATER WELL I i _ I -t-17a 9 0l i i UNDERGROUND POWER -OHP- THRUST BLOCK ' 1 70 ` SOP`lO lii ` CB `��. 6 \ i•Y/ y AND TELEPHONE �IPhT- 111-1 .90/ `, j1 la -a-d0 ...._--��~J 1 49 j L, 1, b __W__________ y--J I I If END CAP L ,- n. Y-1716------------------------------------- --- 0 (n .O we-m. 4 - - ---'W a o.l. alss s2 wAnF YUN 1� i 1 16' PVC I W-169.16 - h-170.00 6590 I I I 11 UTILITY POLE O @ I MTC OR TRANSFORMER '- I �•' �-'� �,� \ - - I SURVEY SYMBOLS TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CON - CURB J,/' �� ,.� i'' " \ \\+\ 6 r i i I (FOUND ) e g I. ( ) I LUMINAIRE 1S i I InW- 16e62 (FOUND) W /8811 ! / ; 15' il-16s.0J 1 IROV PIPE FOUND • }- r t\ \ I i / /�. 1� i/'• 15' Plc \\\\\+\t, 112 M-lb.J2 4' PVC IINOERDItAN ; 1P-165.28 j i i I .�- WALED CONCRETE MONUMENT 0 1-168275'i:16TJ2 ram/ 1 ) (FOUND) CB - \ \ \\ �4• \ \ , \\ 1 w STEEL REBAR (FOUND) O M. j t hI6SBJ-._._._..._..__....._-_..___.--_..__...._4LI ICE CONTROL POINT \ \ \ \ \ \ r 4 12' PVC r•171.84\ \ \ \ \ +\ \ \ \ UNDER(TtOUNOiLl 6' D.L CU55 r � 1 / / , STEEL REBAR `� '1 _ _` h16S 12 \ \ \\ \ DETENTION BASIN \\�\ \ \ _ h`39.6 h1Bt.1 ' ' - -----_--_-..tlAl0^lINE-�'}, I 1 ME CONTROL POINT \` - 1 • pyC\ 50�-'' r ELTC�TRIC �NX - Ja_ \\, \ \\\ \\\ `.� ltz�-:-"\: IELEC?RI690X_ _'!Y/I61B0 PK NAIL v__ ___�a t li9\OF BANK `\\\\\\ \\\ 7TE CWIROL PANT \ \L1rON\EtECTRIC "-`•�... -''J"•^ \4WUOOEN EUB CB \___ BASIN \ ♦ \ \ \ STUB 15 _ b ♦ `" CB171.b T SO ------- IRON PIPE To BE SET O ' h .20 I 5117RIA 19N I slut- \ �'.�` \ \., ---.- r' \ \ \� _- / / / / I n I I T 166.10 T �- ',-Ti'M1B1PE- // ( �^`; \ \ - - - / ! / i L i EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN BASED ON RECORD DRAWING DATED 11 0/00. I 1 f'. ,.----------_.' \ \ • __-- __---------- I or r-17S LASART RENSEC 12129100 PREPAREDB UDEIJ. CONSULTING EN(pNEERs. I hI68. �-E HYDRANT 1 I 4r-._............., _.............. ... .... \ / I // e r 1' \ `'•----~.~ _.._---...-.._ 71)P�OGEAN1y aF I SEWER MN SURVEY 'ER LIMITEPHASE A 0 TEMPORARY PARKING AND + ._.... 4 { `•••�--- '- �y DETENTI.ON.BASW I 1 / /-IB7.�7 ACCESS TO GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE _ - - __ I il/ h154. 7 __ J-_L ------ ---------- T Ir WATER MAN 6' OAS MAW 12' WATER 6' GAS MAW I-I589J `�J. VAIN CONCRETE CURB SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 EDGE aF am PAYfl1ENT +-f5806 \tb /`ce16xoJ h110 Graphlc Scale Feet 50 0 50 100 150 200 CITY OF SOUTH BURLI NGTON DEPAIRTMENT OF PLANNE"JG & ZO1NI�TG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOP TT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 14, 2005 Peter Smichenko David Main IDX Systems, Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: IDX Dear Mr. Smichenko & Mr. Main: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, fi t ' re.cDon�ough Planning & Zoning Assitant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 18, 2005 E. David Crane PO Box 64853 Burlington, VT 054o6 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven. Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, S Betsy McDonough �..f Administrative Assistant Encl. ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGrON DEPA1iTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMO.NT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 18, 2005 Peter Smichenko Director, Corporate Services & Facilities IDX Systems, Corp. P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public -hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLA1NNE'gG & ZONE'qG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 11, 2005 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems, Corp. PO BOX 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the June 7, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 4�r Betsy cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. PLANT LIST 401DX "100 Bldg. Parking Expansion" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect Last Revised 112812005 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT" TOTAL Amelanchier Grandifloria Robin Hill Serviceberry 27 1 1/2"- 1 3/4"' $275.00 $7,425 Robin Hill' Gleditsia Triacanthos Imperial Honeylocust 13 2 1/2" - 3" $525.00 $6,825 Imperial" Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 4 6' - 7' $290.00 $1,160 SUB TOTAL $15,410 Concrete Wall 5,500 SQ.FT. $30.00 $165,000 (Retaining existing vegetation) TOTAL $180,410 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 4/27/2005 PLANT LIST 401DX "Parking Garage" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect Last Revised 4/26/2005 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Forsythia ovata Gleditsia triacanthos ' Imperial' Malus 'Coralburst' Pinus nigra Quercus palustris Ulmus americana 'Princeton' PRICE/PLANT'' TOTAL Autumn Blaze Maple 4 21/2"-3" $550.00 $2,200.00 Early Forsythia 54 3 gal. $37.50 $2,025.00 Imperial Honeylocust 2 2 1/2"-Y $525.00 $1,050.00 Coralburst Crabapple 10 4'-5' $225.00 $2,250.00 Austrian Pine 12 6'-7' $290.00 $3,480.00 Pin Oak 13 21/2"-3" $587.00 $7,631.00 Princeton American 3 21/2"-Y $638.00 $1,914.00 Elm TOTAL $20,550.00 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 4/27/2005 PLANT LIST 1 DX 35 Green Mountain Drive Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 116105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT* TOTAL Acer x freemanii Autumn Blaze Map Autumn Blaze' Gleditsia triacanthos Imperial Honeyloc Imperial' Malus 'Adams' Adams Crabapple Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 11 21/2"-3" $550.00 $6,050.00 6 21/2"-3" $512.50 $3,075.00 5 13/4"-2" $400.00 $2,000.00 6 7'-8' $345.00 $2,070.00 TOTAL $13,195.00 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. toll -free 7 days'. 1 )49, ext. 3025. acial nediate cash for struc- �ments, annuities, taw itances, mortgage cash flows. J.G. 800-794-7310. pure 2Y BOY SOFA: Both e. Matching large - ring rocker, both cot- dgewood, bluish. ition. $1700, new. 0. CAL 985-8726. ;ter, one -of -a -kind. ibte, finial and canopy :cellent condition. ed in Vermont! $1300. 878-2472. !: Wooden, almost 14" x 48", beautiful $90/firm.860-6828. d in small business office. Pull-out key- -, 31Hx7OLx2OD, stor- for PC or mist. Clean. ,65-4927. TABLE: Small, top, white laminate, 30" deep, w/swivel 865-2036. CH AND CHAIR: Good (ou pick up. Call 802- leave message. .lid maple, love seat to full bed. Good con- linatly $500, will sell BO. 802-324-6233, fY DESK: 62" x 24", ogany swivel chair is and leather seat, .070. Couch, $75. i chair, $25. China 150. 802-847-1241. ASK: Mid -sized, good $15. Call 598-5462. MNITURE: Cherry table w/six chairs, ). Four -drawer creden- JBO. Cherry cabinet elf, $250/OBO. Call 1E IN DENMARK enter- 2nter. 1970s, amber t condition. Measures riches. $200/OBO. Call 598-7593. ,H: Big, cushy, realty e! Washable cotton vers. Excellent shape. - it. Leaving the coun- ell. S450/OBO. 802- .LOWTOP mattress ing. Metal frame +sking $300, paid !d less than 2 years, spare bed. 999-5599. lD DRESSER for sale. s, 3'high x 5'long. n good shape but e touching up. ust sell. $50/OBO. 924. Please help! Contact Sara, 238- 1449 or scas@conncolLedu. music for sale SOS FENDER Stratocaster: '67 reissue. Rare guitar, sunburst, maple neck, tweed case. $600. 862-8269. BABY GRAND PIANO: Needs tuning and some work. Best offer. Call 800-592-5930. GUITAR: 314 Taylor with pickup. Great condition! $750/firm. Call evenings, 802-865-5985. PLAYER PIANO: Euphoria Inner Player, made by Cable Company, Chicago. Circa 1910-1928. Has been restored, should be in good working order. Comes with a box of piano rolls and a bench. $450. 651-1070. / music instruct. BASS GUITAR LESSONS at Advance Music. All skill levels welcome. Tons of experience and education. Gordon Stone Band, Concentric. Call Aram, 598-8861. CLAW HAMMER BANJO: Learn Appalachian style pickin' and strummin' Emphasis on rhythm, musicality and technique. $25/hour. Call Mara, 862-3581. GUITAR: Berklee graduate with classical background offers Les- sons in guitar, theory and ear training. Individualized, step-by- step approach. I enjoy teaching all ages/styles/levels. Call Rick Belford at 864-7195. GUITAR INSTRUCTION: All styles/levels. Emphasis on devel- oping strong technique, thor- ough musicianship, personal style. Paul Asbetl (Unknown Blues Band, Kilimanjaro, Sneakers Jazz Band, etc.), 862- 7696, www.pautasbell.com. PIANO LESSONS: Classical, jazz and free improvisation. All ages, all levels. Exciting and encourag- ing approach. Can travel. William Michael, 802-899-6700 or 355-6234. VOICE LESSONS: Singers, actors, speakers. Learn from an experienced, flexible teacher. Vocal Damage repair. Susan Borg, Lincoln, VT (it's worth the trip!) 802-453-7395, weed farm@gmavt.net. ► music services COSMIC HILL project recording studio. 30-years experience. $40/hour. Moretown. 496-3166. DARK GLOBE STUDIOS: Get quality sound, for the cheapest rates in town! Professional audio recording. Great introductory rates starting at $20/hour. Chill environment. All styles welcome. South Burlington. 660-9584 or info@darkgLobestudios.com. 311aiL dnu by-LCu, uecub d good home ASAP:' $225 adoption fee. Interested in meeting this fascinating bird? Call Andrew, 655-4378. ADORABLE F GRAY/WHITE dwarf bunny looking for good home. Incl. cage, hay bin, food dish, litter box, water bottle. Litter, box trained and friendly. 238-8776. TWO SWEET CATS: Eight year - old brothers, dectawed, neutered, wonderful house pets looking for a loving home. 802- 847-1241. WOLF HYBRID PUPPIES for sate. Father Gray wolf/Malamute. Mother Timber wolf/shepherd. Both parents on premises and excellent w/children. Ready 5/30. $350. 453-4520. ► photography A STREET AND DOCUMENTARY photography group looking for interested photographers of all skill levels interested in a monthly meet -up for photography projects. Contact David, rusWp@juno.com or 802-373-1912. ► stuff wanted LOOKING FOR a recumbent bike to buy from you/information on where to get one. Call Emily, 518-281-8979 or atbrie@rpi.edu. RECREATIONAL KAYAK, under 42 lbs., about 9' long, wide cockpit, such as Otter, Swifty or Feathertight. Call 862-8758. TAG SALE ITEMS wanted for Mercy Connections Collaboration of nonprofits. Antiques, col- lectibles, tables, chairs, stools, hutches, other dining room fur- niture, new or slightly used elec- tronics, telephones, tamps, chit- dren's books, DVDs or VHS movies, music or game CDs, other new or unopened items, for June 4 tag sale in Burlington. Call Michelle, 846- 7084 to offer a donation. WANTED: Triple stroller in good - condition, will pay. 864-5195. / volunteers BURLINGTON GREEN PARTY seeks enthusiastic friendly vol- unteer student coordinators to recruit students for Green Party. Orientation, supplies provided. Further info, Owen 802-355- 5247 or Jay 802-324-8219, LIVE, WORK AND LEARN in Buddhist community: New center opening, machine operators, cooking, computer work, fundraising, design, book mak- ing. Includes: classes, medita- tion, Tibetan yoga, RM/BD. 510-981-1987 or dharmavols@ nyingma.org. n1c 111y 11 v uvyn. nduin, WWI Leaving your vh alone for 9 hours a day, hem the opportunity t, outside and exercise. For information & rates please call Laura at (802) 598-1726. THE WOMEN'S RAPE CRISIS CENTER will offer an orientation for those interested in volun- teering to serve on the 24-hour hotline and to assist with com- munity education, Wednesday, 5/25, 5:30-7:30 p.m. at the Women's Rape Crisis Center. Info, 864-0555. VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR needed for Burlington Literary Festival. Duties include recruit- ing, organizing and supervising Large number of volunteers. Stipend plus perks offered. Burlington City Arts, 865-5816. ► want to buy ANTIQUES: Furniture, postcards, pottery, cameras, toys, medical tools, lab glass, photographs, slide rules, license plates and silver. Anything unusual or unique. Cash paid. Call Dave at 802-859-8966. MODERN 50S AND 60S FURNI- TURE by Eames, Knott, Herman Miller, Bertoia, Saarinen, Aalto, Bertoia, Fritz Hansen, etc. Sometime called "space-age" or "retro" Also interested in pot- tery, ceramics and lighting from this era. 864-9386. / wedding svcs. ULTIMATE BRIDAL PARTY - Enjoy a day of pampering and retreat for you and your clan. We'll treat you like the Goddess you are. Your home or ours. Beautiful setting, delicious food and beverages, spa treatments, yoga, your dream come true. Tara Carter CMT, 527-7359 or Lisa Limoge CMT, 860-3991. / legals PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont, on Tuesday, June 7, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: u auuiy. vac uu rates! 802-233-6015, www.fid dleheadconsultants.com. ROOMMATES.COM: Browse hundreds of online listings with photos and maps. Find your roommate with a click of the mouse! Visit http://www.Room mates.com. (AAN CAN) TJ'S WINDOW CLEANING: Free estimates. Discounts offered. Commercial/residential. Call Tom, 802-793-1887. 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-37 and final plat appli- cation #SD-05-38 of Precourt Investment Co, LLC. and Windjammer Hospitality Group, LLC for a boundary line adjust- ment to transfer 223 sq. ft. from 1150 Williston Rd to 1076 Williston Rd. 2. Final plat application #SD-05- 39 of University Mall Realty Trust to amend a previously approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of a 675,115 sq. ft. GFA shopping center complex with 614,338 sq. ft. of GLA. The amendment consists of recon- structing three (3) exisiting entryways, 155 Dorset Street. 3. Application #CU-05-09 of Burlington International Airport for a conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burling- ton Land Development Regula- tions. Request is for permission to develop the property as a com- pensatory wetland mitigation site to compensate for the wetland impacts associated with the Airport's "South End Develop- ment", 250 Van Sicklen Rd. 4. Final plat application #SD-05- 41 of IDX Systems Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment con- sists of Phase II to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Dr., and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval and con- structing new 126 space parking tot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Phase III to include: 1) construct- ing four (4) story west wing addi- tion containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 IDX Dr., and 3) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Dr. to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Dr. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinktage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board May 18, 2005 CITY OIL SOUTH BURLIIIT TOI` DEPARTMENT OIL PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 3, 2005 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: 40 IDX Drive & 35 Green Mountain Drive Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, June 7, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, H Betsy McDonough Adn-nnlstrative A-sistant Encl. ROOF PLAN 1P DKM DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC LORI A. BASS lbass@drm.com drm.com Direct: (802) 846-8393 May 24, 2005 Mr. Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Final Plat Application No. SD-04-73 Dear Mr. Belair: Enclosed please find five oversize copies and one 11 x 17 copy of the Elevation Plan for the expansion of the IDX campus. The official contact person for this application is still Peter Smichenko, the Director of Corporate Services and Facilities for IDX Systems Corporation. However, please contact Bill Schroeder if you need any additional materials to complete this application. Thanks very much. Sincerely, Lori A. Bass Legal Secretary Encs. COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT ■ ST. JOHNSBURY, VT ■ BRATTLEBORO, VT ■ MONTPELIER, VT ■ LITTLETON, NH ■ WWW.DRM.COM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD \drb\sub\idx\final.doc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: May 11, 2005 Plans received: May 10, 2005 IDX - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FINAL PLAT APLICATION #SD-05-41 l5 Meeting Date: June 7, 2005 Owner/Applicant Property Information IDX Systems Corporation Tax Parcels 0915-00040-C and 0720-00035-C 40 IDX Drive Commercial 2 (C2) Zoning District; Traffic Overlay So. Burlington, VT 05403 District - Zone 3; Bartlett Brook Overlay District Location Map a� 4[It• A � A •Yt._ t #"► , 4jr r7w A. �... CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final.doc IDX Systems Corp., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of Phase II to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq. ft. of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval and constructing a new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Phase III to include: 1) constructing four (4) story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 IDX Drive, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Drive to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The applicant received final plat approval for the proposed project from the Planning Commission on February 9, 1999 (decision enclosed). However, the entire project was not constructed and therefore the approval lapsed for the unfinished portion of the project. This application is essentially for re -approval of the same project. The Development Review Board granted the applicant preliminary plat approval for the proposed project on April 5, 2005 (minutes enclosed). Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on May 10, 2005 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. 40 IDX Drive C2 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 713,985 SF �l Max. Building Coverage 40% _ 23% �1 Max. Overall Coverage 70% 65% �l Min. Front Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. 4 Max. Building Height 40 ft. 71.5 ft. zoning compliance waiver required pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations Table 2. 35 Green Mountain Drive C2 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 71,098 SF Max. Building Coverage 40% 0% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 61 % Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a zoning compliance n/a not applicable because parking lots are not subject to setback requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\ dx\final doc PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations requires that the PUD meet the standards of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. 1. Stormwater drainage plans shall comply with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, pursuant to Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations. Both of the subject properties fall within the Bartlett Brook Watershed Overlay District. Thus, the proposed project shall be in compliance with Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant submitted the applicable information regarding the development and stormwater system to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. The City of South Burlington Water Department Superintendent, Jay Nadeau, reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated April 4, 2005 (attached). The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 2. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his memorandum dated March 24, 2005. 3. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the Water Department Superintendent, as outlined in his letter dated April 4, 2005. 4. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation approval for the additional required capacity from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final plat plan approval. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Buffington Land Development Regulations. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final doc Access to the property at 40 IDX Drive is currently provided via a 24' wide curb -cut and a 34' wide curb -cut off of IDX Drive, and a 28' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. Access to the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive is currently provided via an 18' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. No changes to access are proposed for either property. These are sufficient means of access for the project. Circulation on the properties appears to be adequate. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There do not appear to be any wetlands on either of the subject properties, but they do fall within the Bartlett Brook Overlay District. The applicant submitted the applicable information regarding the development and stormwater system to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the stated purpose of the C2 Zoning District (i) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Open space on the property is sufficient. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 6. The South Burlington Fire Department is currently viewing the plans and should have comments available for the meeting. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concerns regarding the above - mentioned criteria. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concems regarding the above - mentioned criteria. (i) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final doc Staff feels that the proposed project is in compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site does provide for adequate planting and safe pedestrian movement. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed expansion requires a minimum 530 parking spaces. All of the buildings on the subject property, including the proposed and existing buildings, require a minimum of 1,346 parking spaces. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, Phase 1 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new second phase" in the application) will require 305 parking spaces, for a total of 1,050 parking spaces. A total of 305 parking spaces are proposed for Phase 1, for a total of 1,037 parking spaces. Phase 2 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new third phase" in the application) requires a minimum of 225 parking spaces. A parking structure containing 565 parking spaces is proposed for this phase. However, phase 2 construction will eliminate 164 existing parking spaces, so the net increase will be 376 parking spaces. In total, the applicant is proposing 1,273 parking spaces, which will require a 73 space, 5.4%, parking waiver. The Development Review Board has the authority to grant this waiver pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. The parking calculations for the proposed project include the 126-space parking area that will be constructed on the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The off -site parking area is within 800 linear feet of the property at 40 IDX Drive, so the Development Review Board has the authority to approve this parking layout, pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations. 7. Pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall record appropriate legal documents to ensure that the off -site parking spaces shall be available for the intended user, prior to recording of the final plat plans. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Most of the parking on the property at 40 IDX Drive is in existence. The proposed parking on this property is located to rear of the existing and proposed building, in relation to Shelburne Road. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The maximum height of proposed structure is 71.5' above average pre -construction grade. Thus CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final doc the applicant is seeking a height waiver of 36.5', which the Development Review Board may grant pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed building elevation plans have been submitted. (fl Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Proposed building elevation plans have been submitted. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require the reservation of land to provide access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The dumpsters on the subject property are existing and are adequately enclosed. (d) Lighting The applicant submitted lighting point -by -point plans for the properties at 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. The proposed lighting -levels are in compliance with Appendix A of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\final doc Land Development Regulations. The proposed lighting fixtures are in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations. (e) Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. The applicant submitted an adequate landscape plan and landscape budget, in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape budget separates the proposed plantings into three (3) phases (attached). The City Arborists reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 9. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Arborist, as outlined in his memorandum dated March 24, 2005. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans depict adequate snow storage areas for both properties. (9 Traffic According to the ITE, 7'h Edition (Land Use Code 710), the proposed expansion is estimated to generate and additional 225.38 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The existing buildings are estimated to generate 347.37 P.M. peak -hour vtes. Thus the property in its entirety is estimated to generate 572.75 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The property is located within the Traffic Overlay District — Zone 3, so it may generate a total of 803.23 peak -hour vtes. The applicant submitted a traffic study with the original application for the IDX expansion project. During the sketch plan review of the current application, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant's traffic engineer review the traffic study to ensure that its recommendations are still applicable to the project. The applicant's traffic engineer reviewed this study and provided comments in a memorandum dated October 18, 2004 (attached). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-05-41, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "comments" section of this document. Respe y submitted, Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Peter Smichenko, applicant FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of a 384,400 square foot general office use facility and a. 679 space parking structure, 1400 Shelburne Road. On the 26°i day of January, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of BDP Realty Associates for final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-➢evel parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot. The 124,208 square feet building was approved on 12/15/87. Several minor site modifications have been made since 1987. This application will be treated as a planned unit development. The preliminary plat was approved on 12/8/98. 2. This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the north by IDX Drive, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the south by an auto dealership. 3. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided by a 32 foot and 45 foot curb cut on IDX Drive and a 24 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. The applicant proposes to: 1) eliminate the Shelburne Road curb cut, 2) extend IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive, and 3) construct two (2) new 24 foot curb cuts on Green Mountain Drive. Circulation on the site is adequate. 4. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 23.9% (maximum allowed is 30% and includes parking garage). Overall coverage is 66.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 0%, along IDX Drive is 31.8%, and along Green Mountain Drive is 21.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Front yard coverage along IDX Drive is proposed to be exceeded. The Planning Commission allowed this coverage to be exceeded under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations as part of the preliminary plat approval. 5. The existing building and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Green Mountain Drive. The proposed setback is 32 feet. The applicant sought a waiver from the front setback requirement as provided under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. A 12 foot setback was approved as part of the preliminary plat approval. 1 6. Parking: A total of 1538 spaces are required and 1425 spaces are provided including 26 handicapped spaces. This represents a 113 space or 7.3% shortfall. The Commission, as part of preliminary plat approval, agreed to base parking calculation on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and exclude the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. The total parking required would be 1456 spaces which would result in a 31 space or 2.1 % space shortfall. 7. Parking structure: The proposed parking structure is in substantial compliance with the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures." The parking layout within the structure has been revised since preliminary plat approval such that the maximum distance between parking spaces and nearest exit stairwell is less than 200 feet. The applicant has not provided sufficient lighting information within the parking structure to determine compliance with the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. The guidelines require that two (2) elevators be provided. The applicant indicated that the State will not require elevators because this is a private parking structure. The Planning Commission agreed to not require elevators. 8. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $257,950 which is being met. Proposed plantings include: Red Maple, (seen dash, Crabapple, Honeylocust, Sugar Maple, Birch, Pin Oak, Shadblow, Spruce, Pine, Viburnum, Juniper, and Wintercreeper. Landscaping plan should be revised to provide street trees on the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Additional evergreen landscaping should be provided around the existing cooling tower adjacent to 1DX Drive. 9. Preliminary plat condition #13b required that parking be shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle and parking and the proposed r.o.w. (at the northwest corner ofthe site) and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. This condition has been met. 10. Building height: Section 25.113(a) of the zoning regulations limits the height of a flat roof structure to 35 feet. The proposed addition will have a height of 68 feet from the average pre - construction grade. This is 33 feet greater than permitted. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non-residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i)) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. Preliminary plat stipulation #9 granted the height waiver. 11. Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires additional front, side and rear setbacks for taller structures. The proposed addition will meet the additional setback requirements. E 12. Height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level is 32 feet. 13. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District BBW-. This property is located in the BBW District. Under Section 23.20 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Fleindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. The final plat plans incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes. 14. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation requested is 25,500 gpd (this includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. Preliminary plat stipulation # 10 requires that no Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 15. Traffic: Two (2) traffic impact studies were submitted dated November 19, 1995 and January 21, 1999. The studies indicate the following: 1) Overall levels of service during the A.M. and P.M. peak hour north of IDX are acceptable with the IDX expansion in year 2005. 2) IDX Drive/US 7 operates poorly during the 2005 A.M. build scenario. 3) South of IDX Drive, certain intersections operate at poor levels of service by year 2005. The study further concludes that all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service after the Route 7 widening project. In a letter dated January 26, 1999, the VAOT indicates that the widening of Route 7 will correct any problems associated with the IDX expansion, including the coordination of traffic signals in the corridor. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $110,000. 16. Dumpsters: The dumpsters will be located inside the building. 17. bighting: Proposed exterior lighting consists of the following: — twelve (12) 100 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 43" bollards. — nine (9) 27 watt flourescent lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. — thirteen (13) 100 watt halogen stake -mounted uplights. — three (3) 100 watt halogen surface -mounted uplights. — forty-four (44) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 20 foot poles with downcasting shielded fixtures. eleven (11) fountain lights. 18. Existing exterior lights consist of the following: nine (9) 250 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures. A point by point lighting plan was submitted which indicates that the average illumination on the site is 1.4 to 1.6 foot candles. This meets the City's lighting standards. 19. Sidewalk: The applicant should construct a sidewalk along their frontage on Green Mountain Drive. The sidewalk should be constructed as part of the street construction. 20. Phasing: This project will be constructed in three (3) main phases. Phase I would begin in the summer of 1999 and consist of constructing the east wing of the main building including the connecting link and the extension of both IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. Phase II would begin in 2000 and involve constructing the parking structure. Phase III would begin in 2002 and would involve constructing the west wing of the main building. Staff recommended that this approval be conditioned on obtaining the zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. 21. Other. - the "residential zone" on sheet SP1 should be noted as "R4 District." — plans do not comply with preliminary plat condition #13 that requires the plan to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. applicant has submitted evidence that these plans have been submitted to the City Water Department. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 11 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space or 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen landscaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. c) The site plan (sheet SP 1) shall be revised to change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. e) The plans shall be revised to show all ground mounted generators/cooling equipment/HVAC equipment. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. 16. In order to make a determination that the project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left -turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 75,000 square feet of office space). Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Shelburne Road widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled, "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/21/99. For a period of five (5) years starting 10/1/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a year) progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. 6 17 The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Any phase which has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 19. The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP 1, SP2, SP3 and L.1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Chairman or Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission Date 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 5 APRIL 2005 Mr. Dinklage noted this deck has already been built. He also said he had driven by the property and felt what was built was quite a departure from what the neighbors have, and he was not convinced of its necessity. Mr. Kupferman said staff hadn't had a chance to review the new proposal, and he wasn't sure it was a suitable response to the Board's concerns. Mr. Huyer felt the encroachment was only 2 additional feet. Mr. Dinklage explained how the city calculates the encroachment from the platform. Mr. Belair added this is 2 feet beyond what is allowed. UP to 5 feet is exempt from the setback. This is a total of 7 feet. Mr. Dinklage suggested making the deck as wide as they need with stairs along the front of the house instead of into the setback. Mr. Huyer felt there were others in the Orchards that were built similar to what he built. Mr. Boucher then moved to approve Application #CU-04-15 of Garret & Lisa Huyer subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion failed 0-4. 4. Continued Public Dearing: Site Plan Application #SP-05-01 of Friendly Ice Cream Corp. to amend a previously approved Ian for a 4,571 sq. ft. restaurant. The amendment consists of revising the landscaping plan, 1184 Shelburne Road: The applicant was not present, and Mr. Belair indicated he had had no input from them. He suggested denying the application as they were at the end of the 45-day period. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-05-01 of Friendly Ice Create Corp. subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion failed 0-4. (50 Public Dearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-19 of IDX Systems Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of Phase II to include: 1) adding three floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq ft of general office use, and constructing 179 new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Dr., and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq. ft. building, off -site parking approval and constructing new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Drive. Phase III to include: -2- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 5 APRIL 2005 1) constructing four story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq. ft. of general office use at 40 IDX Dr., and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Dr., to replace off -site parking at 35 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Smichenko said this is a renewal of an existing permit. They have finished Phase I and with a few minor changes, want to begin Phase II. During construction of the parking garage, they will provide parking on a site they own on Green Mountain Drive. Mr. Belair noted the requested height waiver is a bit higher than originally approved to accommodate rooftop apparatus that won't be visible. The approval motion was amended to add Stipulation # 13 as follows: The Development Review Board approves 1273 parking spaces which represents a 73-space or 5.4% waiver. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-05-19 of IDX Systems subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Bearing: Application #CU-05-05 of Richard T. & Rebecca B. Cassidy for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is to expand the building without increasing the building footprint, 5 Lyons Avenue: and 7. Public Hearing: Application #CII-05-04 of Richard T. & Rebecca B. Cassidy for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for a 598 sq ft accessory residential unit, 5 Lyons Avenue: Mr. Cassidy explained that the exterior renovations include removing a shed on the east side of the house. The shed on the west side will be expanded to have an office area and laundry room. Mr. Cassidy said there have been no objections from neighbors, and Mr. Belair said he has heard none either. -3- 1 OY4� ddo u I Permit Application No. SD-44-71` ,57-- Y/ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403, Phone (802) 862-1022, Fax (802) 862- 8098. 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Deeds to IDX Systems Corporation recorded in Book 501 at Page 513, Book 501 at Page 518, Book 447 at Page 133. 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, P.O. Box 1070, Burlington, VT 05402-1070, Phone (802) 862-1022, Fax (802) 862-8098. 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Peter Smichenko, Director, Corporate Services & Facilities, IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, P.O. Box 1070, Burlington, VT 05402-1070, Phone (802) 859-4135, Fax (802) 862-8098. 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 40 IDX Drive; 35 Green Mountain Drive. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0915-00040; 0720-00035. 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 40 IDX Drive: 124,208 square foot office building, 88,449 square foot partially completed east wing building containing storage and office space, 20,476 square foot connector/cafeteria building, 732 striped surface parking spaces and related site improvements. 35 GM Drive: 14,389 square foot office/production building, parking lot and related site improvements. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Existing: Existing uses at 40 IDX Drive to remain, except for approximately 189 parking spaces that will be supplanted by the west wing building and the parking structure. New second phase: New construction completing the east wing building by adding three floors containing 87,234 square feet of office space, and construction of 179 net new parking surface parking spaces, at 40 IDX Drive; demolition of existing improvements and construction of a new parking lot containing 126 parking spaces at 35 GM Drive. New third phase: New construction of a four-story west win building containing 64,025 square feet of office space at 40 IDX Drive; new construction of a parking structure containing 565 parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive to replace surface parking at 35 GM Drive and 40 IDX Drive. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing original office building: 124,208 sf. Existing cafeteria/connector building: 20,476 sf. Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Existing east wing building: Proposed completion of east wing building: Proposed west wing building: Total: 88,449 sf. 87,234 sf. 64,025 sf. (excludes parking structure) 384,392 sf. Note: All floor areas are in gross square feet (to exterior wall surface) d) Height of building and number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Height Floors Existing original office building: 40 3 Existing connector/cafeteria building: 30 2 Existing east wing building: 38.5* 3 (includes basement) Proposed completion of east wing building: 71.5 * 6 (includes basement) Proposed west wing building: 40.5* 4_ Proposed parking structure: 33.5 3 *Revised from preliminary plat application — see Exterior Elevation prepared by Freeman French Freeman e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Employees Existing employees at 40 IDX Drive 650* Estimated capacity for existing buildings at 40 IDX Drive 825 Estimated capacity with completed east wing building 1350 Estimated capacity with west wing building 1775 *Includes part-time employees at a factor of .5 IDX currentlVoperates two company vehicles, and proposes to operate two company vehicles after the expansion. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) This application proposes the remainder of the planned expansion of the IDX campus at 40 IDX Drive. The South Burlington Planning Commission previously granted planned unit development for the entire expansion preliminary plat approval granted December 8, 1998, final plat approval granted January 26, 1999). The previous approval contemplated phased construction. Phase I was to include the addition of a six floor east wing containing approximately 175,588 square feet of office and storage space and a 20,476 square foot cafeteria/connector building, and the extension of IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive. Phase II was to consist of a three -level parking structure containing 679 parking spaces, and Phase III was to consist of the addition of a four floor west wing containing approximately 64,120 square feet of office space. IDX has completed part of Phase I of the approved development, including the connector/cafeteria building and three of the six floors planned for the east wing building containing approximately 88,449 square feet of office and storage space, the Green Mountain Drive extension, and surface parking lots, stormwater collection and treatment systems, landscaping and related site improvements. Construction has not proceeded as quickly as ori:;inally planned, and the Planning Commission approvals for the remainder of the development have now expired. Permit Application No. SD-04-73 IDX now proposes to complete Phase I as previously approved by adding three floors to the east wing building, containing approximately 87,234 square feet of additional office space (total east wing gross floor area would be approximately 175,683 square feet). IDX would construct a total of approximately 305 net additional surface parking spaces on site at 40 IDX Drive and off site at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The 179 net additional parking spaces proposed for 40 IDX Drive would be provided prior to occupancy of the first additional floor of the east wing building, the 126 net additional parking spaces at 35 Green Mountain Drive would be provided prior to occupancy of the second additional floor of the east wing building. IDX also proposes to complete Phases II and III as previously approved, except that IDX now proposes to reduce the size of the parking structure, and to construct it later, simultaneously with the construction of the proposed west wing building. The proposed west wing would contain approximately 64,025 gross square feet of office space. Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 3.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. In the prior qpproval, the Planning Commission excluded the connector/cafeteria building from parking calculation (see Finding of Fact No. 6 of the February 9, 1999 of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval). With the connector/cafeteria building included, the required and proposed parking would be as follows: Gross Floor Area Required Parking Proposed Parking Existing 212,657 sf. 744 732 (existing) With completed east wing building 320,367 sf. 1,122 1,037 With west wing building 384,392 sf. 1,346 1,273 This planned unit development is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. IDX constructed all of the proposed stormwater treatment systems required in this Overlay District as part of the first phase of the development. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, numbers of units, lot mergers, etc. The Applicant has made the following changes in response to the conditions set forth in the preliminary plat approval issued by the Design Review Board on April 8, 2005, as follows: i. The site plans for 40 IDX Drive have been revised to show dropped curbs at the access points and dumpster locations (Sheets SP3 and SP4), to show erosion control details in a separate sheet (Sheet SP5E), and to address the comments of the South Burlington Water Department (April 4, 2005 comment letter attached to this application). ii. The planting plans for 40 IDX Drive (Sheets SP3A and SP313) have been revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist, with corresponding changes to the landscaping cost calculations (see Section 12(b) below). iii. The site plan for 35 IDX Drive has been revised to reduce the proposed overall coverage from 43,575 square feet to 43,528 square feet (see Section 9(b) below). iv. The required parkin and night waivers have been recalculated, based on inclusion of the connector/cafeteria building in the gross floor area figures and the heights above average pre -construction grade shown in the Exterior Elevation prepared by Freeman French Freeman (see Section 11 below). v. The stormwater discharge information for 40 IDX Drive and 35 GM Drive required for the Bartlett Brook Watershed has been submitted to the City's consultant (see April 14, 2005 transmittal letter attached to this 4pplication). 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class 1, II or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? Not applicable Permit Application No. SD-04-73 c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: Not applicable 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 40 IDX Drive: 713,984.5 square feet; 16.39 acres +/-* 35 GM Drive: 71,098 square feet; 1.63 acres +/- *This parcel size excludes the triangular area at the southeast corner of the intersection of IDX Drive and Route 7, conveyed to the State of Vermont for the Route 7 widening project by BDP Realty Associates by deed recorded in Book 550 at Pape 589. By agreement with the City of South Burlington at the time of the conveyance, IDX may include the triangular area in the parcel size for coverage calculations. IDX has not included the triangular parcel in these coverage calculations because it is not necessary to satisfy coverage limits. b) Building Coverage: 40 IDX Drive: Existing 82,064 square feet 11.49% Proposed 163,607 square feet 22.92% (includes parking structure) 35 GM Drive: Existing 14,389 square feet 20.24% Proposed 0 square feet 0% c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): 40 IDX Drive: Existing 412,908 square feet 57.83% Proposed 464,337 square feet 65.04% 35 GM Drive: Existing 44,777 square feet 63.0% Proposed 43,528 square feet 60.3% d) Front Yard Coverages(s) (commercial projects only) 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 27,168 square feet (along Shelburne Road) Existing 910 square feet 3.35% Proposed 910 square feet 3.35% 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 23,111 square feet (along IDX Drive) Existing 6002 square feet 25.97% Proposed 6002 square feet 25.97% 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 23,501 square feet (along GM Drive) Existing 0 square feet 0% Proposed 2315 square feet 9.85% 35 GM Drive: Setback Area 6,755 square feet Existing 2,629 square feet 38.9% rd C C Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Proposed 723 square feet 10.7% 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 40 IDX Drive: 2.25 acres* 35 GM Drive: 0.99 acres* *Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that applicant is seeking The Applicant is requesting waivers of the building heightand parking requirements of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, as described below: Building Height Waiver: Section 3.07(D) of the Regulations imposes a 35 foot height limit above average pre - construction grade for a structure with a flat roof. The east wing building (the tallest proposed building) would have a height of approximately 71.5 feet above average pre -construction grade. Applicant seeks a height waiver under Section 3.07(F)(2) of the Regulations. The Development Review Board granted a height waiver for a height of 77.5 feet in the preliminartiplat approval. The new height measurement is based on the Exterior Elevation prepared by Freeman French Freeman. Parking Waiver: As noted above, Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 1,122 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I (the expanded east win building), uilding); the Applicant proposes 1,037 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I; Section 13.01 requires 1,346 parking spaces upon completion of Phase II (the west wing building); the Applicant proposes 1273 parking spaces upon completion of Phase II. In the preliminary plat approval, the Development Review Board granted the requested 5.4% waiver of the parking space requirement for Phase II. The Applicant now seeks a waiver of the parking space requirements for both Phase I and Phase II. 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) Completion of east wing base building Completion of east wing building fit -up Expansion of existing 40 IDX Drive parking lot Surface parking on parking structure site West wing base building West wing fit -up Parking structure $5,370,000 $3,045,000 $400,000 (excludes planting) $328,000 $5,120,000 $2,240,000 $6,100,000 (excludes planting) b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) 40 IDX Drive — Phase I $180,410* (to be installed with parking lot expansion) 40 IDX Drive — Phase II $20,550* (to be installed with parking structure) 40 IDX Drive — Phase III $0 (already installed) 35 GM Drive $12,64,5* *See attached Plant Lists prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) I Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Demolition 35 GM Drive $62,000 Parking lot 35 GM Drive $423,000 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC (excludes landscaping) a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) Weekday Existing buildings (at full capacity) 2,442 With proposed completion of east wing building: 3,996 With proposed west wing building: 5,254 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 429 With proposed completion of east wing building: 702 With proposed west wing building: 923 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 347 With proposed completion of east wing building: 567 With proposed west wing building: 746 Weekend 289 473 621 The estimated average dailv traffic is based on 1998 traffic counts indicatine a weekdav average of 2.96 vehicle trips per employee and a weekend average of .35 trips per employee. The estimate peak hour trips are based on A.M peak hour trip generation rate of .52 trips per employee, and P.M. peak hour trip generation rate of .42 trips per employee, determined by Resource Systems Group in its 1999 traffic study. See attached letter from Resource Systems Group confirming that its 1999 study assumptions are still valid. 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Mondaythrough Friday. 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE IDX anticipates that it will start construction of the remainder of the east wing building and the surface parking lots in June 2005, and will occupy the first of the three new floors by June of 2006. IDX estimates that it will start construction of the west wing building and the parking structure in the Spring of 2008. 17) PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS (include those across a street). You may attach on a separate sheet: Property Address Property Owner Name and Mailing Address (per 2004 Grand List) 40 IDX Drive Abutting Properties (includes properties directly across public roads): 1333 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee, 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 1335 Shelburne Road same as above 1341 Shelburne Road same as above See Way Care Wash, Inc., 368 Olde Orchard Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 1360 Shelburne Road BDP Realty Associates, 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 1459 Shelburne Road Anthony Socinski, 1459 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1475 Shelburne Road Two O'Briens Properties, LLC, 1475 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1485 Shelburne Road DBS Limited Partnership, c/o Goss Dodge, Inc., 1485 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05043 2 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 1580 Shelburne Road Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 75 Green Mountain Drive Pammella and George Starbuck Family Trust, 147 West Shore Road, Grand Isle, VT 05458 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 40 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 41 IDX Drive Plaza Investments, 28 Day Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Mervin Brown 35 Green Mountain Drive Abutting Properties (includes properties directiv across public roads): 30 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 45 Green Mountain Drive Meadowood Enterprises, 212 Meadow Wood Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 17) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: ID. :3 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER: ID. 7 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: J �� I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: -r Complete ❑ Incomplete c anning & Zoning or Designee April 14, 2005 Megan Moir Heindel and Noyes P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, Vermont 05406 RE: IDX Systems Corporation Preliminary P" Decision #SD-05-19 Dear Megan: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com Pursuant to the Preliminary Plat Approval #SD-05-19, dated April 8, 2005, enclosed please find information related to stormwater discharge for 40 IDX Drive and 3 5 Green Mountain Drive. The landowner and applicant for each parcel is IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. The review request for each parcel is as follows: • 40 IDX Drive IDX Systems Corporation was issued a Stormwater Discharge Permit 1-0512, dated July 8, 1999, granting permission to discharge treated and controlled stormwater runoff from roadways, parking and roofs from the IDX Office Complex on Shelburne Road, in South Burlington, Vermont to a tributary of North Brook The existing stormwater management system was permitted and constructed for the complete build out of the IDX Campus. A General Permit for discharge 3347-9010 was received on March 22, 2004, for continued operation of the stormwater management system. IDX Systems Corporation opted to phase the full build out of campus over several years, and as a result the City permits expired. Therefore, a permit renewal for construction at 40 IDX Drive is before the City Development Review Board. The existing stormwater system was permitted and constructed for the complete build out of the IDX Campus in the year 2000. Enclosed are the following items for your review: 1. Site plan drawings from the 2000 approval SP2 and SP3 last revised 5\26\00 and 4\17\00, respectfully. 2. Site plans currently being reviewed are sheets SP3 and SP4 last revised 4\08\05. The drawings illustrate that the scope of work for the project has not changed. 3. A copy of the Executive Stormwater Summary prepared in 1999. 4. A copy of Heindel and Noyes Report dated 4\26\99. 5. Discharge Permit 1-0512 and General permit 3347-9010. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting 0 3 5 Green Mountain Drive The current development at 3 5 Green Mountain Drive consists of an office building with associated parking on 1.63 acres. The permittee is proposing demolition of the existing site improvements (office building, parking lot) and replacing the improvements with an employee parking lot. The parameters for the redesign are as follows: • The existing impervious area is 44,777 square feet. • The impervious area has been reduced to 43,528 square feet. • The current stormwater runoff sheet flows off the impervious suifaces and is collected in a closed catch basin system prior to discharging to the City catch basin system. The loading dock area and a portion of the roof appear to sheet flow to the south, across vegetation prior to reaching the City catch basin system This project discharges to North Brook • The new employee parking lot will improve on water quality with 37 percent of the impervious area sheet flowing to a grassed swale prior to discharging to a catch basin system connected to the City system Enclosed are the following items for your review: 1. Existing conditions plan and the proposed site plan 2. Original Temporary Pollution Permit 2-0908. 3. General Permit 3019-9010. 4. Correspondence with Padraic Monks, regarding permit amendments. Please review the enclosed information and provide response to Prelirnmwy Plat Decision #SD-05-19, condition #5. Should you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Very truly yotirs, UDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Debra A Bell Project Manager Encl. cc. David Main, Brad Carter File No. 04-14 PIN. EJ98-3402 Permit No. 1-0512 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AMENDED DISCHARGE PERMIT STORMWATER RUNOFF TO WATERS OF THE STATE In compliance with provisions of 10 V.S.A. 1263 and 10 V.S.A. 1264 . BDP Realty Assoc. c/o IDX Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 and in accordance with "Terms and Conditions" hereinafter specified, the above named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge treated and controlled stormwater runoff from the roadways, parking, and roofs from the "IDX Office Complex", Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT to an unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 1. Expiration Date: March 31, 2004. Note: This permit, unless revoked, shall be valid until the designated expiration date despite any intervening change, in water quality, effluent, or treatment standards of the classification of the receiving waters, including groundwater. However, any such changed standard or classification shall be applied in determining whether or not to renew the permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. 1263. Re -apply for a discharge permit by September 30, 2003. Z. Revocation: '10 V.S.A. 1267 provides as follows: "The Secretary may revoke any permit issued by him pursuant to this subchapter if he finds that the permit holder submitted false or inaccurate information in his application or has violated any requirement, restriction, or condition of the permit issued. Revocation shall be effective upon actual notice thereof to the permit holder." 3. Operating Fees: This discharge is`subject to operating fees. The permittee shall submit the operating fees in accordance with procedures provided by the Secretary. 4. Transfer of Permit: This permit is not transferable without prior written approval of the Secretary. All application and operating fees shall be paid in full. prior to transfer of this permit. The permittee shall notify the Secretary immediately, in writing, of any sale, lease, or other transfer of ownership of the property from which the discharge originates. The permittee shall provide a copy of this permit to the new owner or tenant and shall inform the new owner 1 � Permit A-0512 Page 2 of or tenant of his responsibility to make application for a permit which shall be issued in his name. Any failure to do so shall be considered a violation of this permit. 5. Right of EnML :- The permittee shall allow the Secretary or their authorized representative, upoi presentation of .credentials, to enter the permittee's premises where the effluent sources authorized by this permit are located and at reasonable times to have access to copy any record: required to be kept under the terms' and conditions of this permit, and to inspect any treatment device, monitoring equipment, or monitoring method required in this permit, and to sample an} discharge of pollutants. 6. Receiving Waters: Unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 7. Manner of Discharge: SIN 001: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, parking and roadways, collected in a catchbasi system to "wet pond" stormwater management system, then discharging via a controlled outlet structure to a Swale which in turn discharges to an unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 8. Wastes Permitted: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, roadways, and parking areas after treatment and control via stormwater detention ("wet") pond. 9. Volumes Permitted and Frequency of Discharge: Such volumes and frequency, as. required by the discharges specified in No. 6 above . 10. Approved Project Design: Treatment as specified in No. I. above. The project shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Truduell_ Consutling Engineers, Inc. plan sheet specified below, and supporting information: Sheets SP1 and SP2, dated 11/12/98 last revised 4/15/99 Sheet SP3 dated 11/12/98 last revised 5/04/99 . .Sheet D3..dated 11/12/98 last. revised.12122/98 Sheet D6 dated 01/21/99 last revised 05/14/99 Via reference the above noted plans are made a part of this permit. 11. Maintenance and Maintenance Reporting Requirements: a. All basins, swales, and related stormwater devices shall be maintained in good operating order at all times .and shall be inspected biannually and shall be cleaned as necessary to maintain design specifications. b. Any sediment removed from: the swales, or the detention basin shall be disposed of properly and not within 100 feet of Waters of the State. i Permit #1-0512 Page 3 of 4 c. By SEPTEMBER 30 OF EACH YEAR a written. report shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Conservation, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05671-0405. This report shall included, as a minimum: L.: the dates and details of cleaning and maintenance operations carried out in the preceding year. ii. a narrative summarizing the results of any inspections conducted in the preceding year and highlighting stormwater related problems encountered during the preceding year. d. Should any erosional problems occur, the permittee is required to immediately correct any such problems. _ e. Any basins, swales or related stormwater devices used during'construction for erosion control shall be inspected and cleaned to design specifications immediately after construction has been completed. 12. Personnel and Training Requirements: Such personnel and training as necessary to fulfill the requirements of #10 above. 13. Monitoring and repotting Requirement: No monitoring required; reporting requirement as specified in #10 above. 14. Other Requirements: a. Treated stormwater runoff is the only waste authorized for disposal under the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge for any hazardous materials or hazardous waste into the stormwater management system is prohibited. b. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the -permittee from obtaining coverage under General Permit 3-9001, if applicable. 14. Issue Date of Permit: AGE CY OYNATURAL RESOURCES Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation B ��/ �► Marilyn' 1. Davis, irect r' Wastewater Management Division No Text SUNIMARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For BDP REALITY ASSOCIATES INTRODUCTION BDP Realty Associates obtained Stormwater Discharge Permit # 1-0512 on November 3, 1987, for Interpretive Data Systems (cxurently IDX) located at 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. The permit allowed them to discharge stormwater from the site to the North Brook portion of the Bartlett Brook Watershed. This stormwater analysis was prepared in order to minimize hydrologic impacts to downstream waterways and to prevent water quality degradation and adverse impact to the stormwater flow characteristics of the watershed. Both the pre -development condition of 1986 and the proposed campus build out were analyzed using Haestead TR-55 Hydrologic Method to determine pre and post development peak stormwater runoff volumes. Hydrologic computations were made using a 2 year 24 hour storm event and a Type II rainfall distribution. The 25-year storm event was also analyzed to comply with the City of South Burlington's, Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. H. SITE DESCRIPTION The study area involves 27.51 acres, 10.83 acres of which are located upslope of the site and the balance is 16.68 acres of site area. The parcel is bound to the north by Holmes Avenue Extension (IDX Drive), to the east by Green Mountain Drive, to the south by Heritage Motors and to the west by Shelburne Road. The property originally (1986) was mixed pasture and scrub woodland. The land has a gentle slope of 2 to 6 percent west to the discharge point (S/N001) of the site which is a 42 inch reinforced concrete pipe flowing west across Shelburne Road. The IDX site is underlain by soils of the following SCS groups: Enosburg & Whately, Belgrade, Adams, and Covington. IM DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATIONS — PR&DEVELOPMENT The IDX site and the watershed area upgradient has been analyzed for the 1986 pre -development condition that was mixed pasture and scrub woodland. The site is located in drainage area PREB86 and the offsite contribution is drainage area PREA86 (refer to drainage map #1). The predevelopment TR 55 curve number and time of concentration were computed as the following: Drainage Area Acres " CN Tc P�� +`�"'`q � � �i ar T,�� 7F � ✓r�'�S" f �''�.�`` z�c`� a f"'� r sr !R PREB86 (site) 16.68 81 0.1858 Stotmwater from these areas travel overland to a small farm drainage swale to the discharge point S/N001, which is the 42 inch culvert crossing at Route 7. The pre -development peak flow at the discharge point was determined to be 15.72 cfs at critical t=12.00, using a typical 2 year 24 hour design storm event and a Type II rainfall distribution. IV. DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATIONS — POST -DEVELOPMENT Post -development peak flows were estimated by first delineating three drainage areas that are based on the closed drainage system direction and the proposed project expansion. These areas are labeled on the enclosed drainage map. Post-developme A peak flow from a 2 year 24 hour storm event was calculated to be 27.3 cfs. It is therefore necessary to incorporate stomiwater detention into the system to reduce the post - development peak flow from the site to allowable pre -development levels. Following is a description of each of the post development areas: Drainage area 98051POST2 consists of 7.79 aces of which 3.78 acres is landscaped with dense lawn. Approximately 3.08 acres is pavement and 0.93 aces of building roof. The iunofffrom this area begins either as overland flow to a closed catch basin system or sheet flows off the current parking lots into grassed swales which convey the runoffto the closed catch basin system This closed system extends around the northside the existing building and discharges into the wet pond. Sediment treatment is achieved in the grassed swales , the sediment shelf at the discharge point and in the wet pond. The post development peak flow from this drainage area was calculated to be 7.12 cfs. (SIN001) 2. Drainage area 98051POST3 consists of 8.89 acres ofwhich 6.65 aces is pavement requiring treatment and the balance is 1.02 acres of building and 1.22 acres of landscaping and dense lawn. The runoff from this area sheet flows offthe pavement into a closed catch basin system, which extends around the southside of the proposed development and discharges into the southern wet pond. A sediment shelf has been designed at the discharge point to help remove sediment prior to the wet pond. The post development peak flow from this drainage area was calculated to be 20.97 cfs. (S/N001) 3. Drainage area 98051POSI consists of 10.83 acres which is undeveloped. The nuiofffrom this area travels overland then is picked up in the drainage system in IDX Drive and is discharged into the wet pond. The post development peak flows from this drainage area is calculated to be 0.0 cfs. (S/N00I) Table 2 summarizes the peak discharge information from the post -developed site. 1F ! �e b��,(� .j � iP'� h5�..- ! � IM � H,�,. 1 �W � •..R C �rY 6 , 6 } •vi e� ® 0 6 e > � �® �`�� Q� ��K6� n � �a W �irt� ,%i ,rF ��a�e�� l��d� �i t�emrr✓7*•'.' �' �, �-i` S Tom+ y ..y'.?n,� i a� r.;qT' �� :r^• .,�- �,n s:. '. :;:w=ce ✓' 1--�, tc: V. DISCHARGE SUMMARY Currently the stormwater runoff from the existing development discharges into a wet pond located in front ofthe building along Route 7 at S/NOOL This wet pond has a bottom elevation 158.00 and a water surface elevation of 164.9. The controlling outlet is an 18 inch cmp riser with a 12 inch discharge pipe. The peak discharge from the site is currently 16.0 cfs. The new expansion proposal is to utilize and expand the existing pond to 55,486 cu. ft. (see attached) and construct a second wet pond to the south with 31,483 cu. ft., and a 15 inch pipe connecting the two (total cu. ft. 86,970). The bottom elevation of the wet pond will be 158.0 and the nominal stage elevation will be set at 162.0. The existing outlet structure will be replaced with an inline water level control structure which has stop logs placed inside the box at a width of 24 inches to reduce the post developmenrt peak discharge from the 2 year 24 hour storm event to 7.13 cfs. The peak water elevation will be 163.77 feet. An emergency spillway has been designed at the outlet and the spillway elevation is set at 165.5 feet. Detailed Hydrologic computations and design drawings are included with this Executive Summary. Heindel and Noyes i H \/14 P.O. Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4709 P April 26, 1999 14 Ms. Debra A. Bell Trudell Consulting Engineers, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: IDX 1998/1999 Expansion Dear Debra: • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers • Environmental Scientists 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 This letter/report presents the results of our hydrologic evaluation for the final plans for the proposed IDX expansion project on Shelburne Road. This report updates the analysis presented in our letter/report dated January 21, 1999. The proposed development is located within the North Brook portion of the Bartlett L Brook watershed. The analysis was performed using information provided by your office for the project site. This included the computation of existing and proposed impervious area, and the identification of relevant soil types. Heindel and Noyes computed a hydraulic curve number for post development conditions and the data was input into the existing data file for the entire watershed. An evaluation was performed for the 2-year and 24-year, 24-hour storms, which result in 2.2 and 4.0 inches of rainfall, respectively, in South Burlington. To evaluate the overall impact of the proposed expansion on the watershed, peak discharge rates have been computed at four locations. Peak discharge rates are calculated for three different scenarios: pre -development, post -development and post - development with an enlarged detention basin. 111011 At the outflow of the site, the projected peak discharge rate is 29.8 cfs for the existing condition. For the post -development condition, a significant increase in peak discharge is projected (59.2 cfs). Peak flows are predicted to decrease to 19.9 cfs with the expansion of the existing wet pond on site. At the point where North Brook crosses Shelburne Road, the peak discharge rate is 155.1 cfs, 186.6 cfs and 143.6 cfs for pre - development conditions, post -development conditions, and post -development DIM conditions with an enlarged detention pond. At the point where North Brook crosses the railroad tracks (adjacent to the Bartlett Bay Sewage Treatment Plant), the peak discharge rates are 197.6 cfs, 232.0 cfs and 185.5 cfs for pre -development conditions, post -development conditions and post -development conditions with an enlarged wet pond, respectively. At the base of the watershed (Bartlett Bay), the peak discharge — rates are 121.5 cfs and 120.5 cfs for pre -development and post -development conditions with an expanded wet pond, respectively. The model projects that the increased runoff c Ms. Debra A. Bell April 26, 1999 Page 2 from the IDX expansion without an expanded pond would result in flooding of the stream channel at the base of the watershed. A summary of peak discharge rates at these various points in the watershed for pre-, post- and post -development conditions with an enlarged pond is attached. Also attached are schematic drawings of pre- and post- development drainage scenarios. This information is summarized in the following table. Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates Location Pre -Development Conditions (cfs) Post -Development Conditions (cfs) Post -Development Conditions w/ Expanded Pond (cfs) Site Outlet 28.3 59.2 19.9 Shelbume Road Culvert 155.1 186.6 143.6 Railroad Tracks Culvert 197.6 232.0 185.5 Base of Watershed 121.5 NA 120.5 A significant increase in peak discharge is projected throughout the watershed as a result of the proposed expansion. Based on these results, it is our conclusion that the storm water management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission for the Bartlett Brook/North Brook watershed would be better met with the expansion of the, existing storm water detention pond on the IDX site. Modeling of the site and its immediate watershed (30 acres) projects an increase from It 29.8 cfs (existing site conditions) to 59.2 cfs peak discharge rate during the 25-year 24- hour storm event. This assumes that the runoff from the existing development is directed towards the existing detention pond and that storm water runoff from the expansion is not contained within a detention pond but introduced directly to the stream. It was calculated that the existing wet pond expanded to a bottom area of 9,450 square feet, total depth of 8 feet, a desired stage of 48 inches and a 24" orifice could adequately contain 115,501 cubic feet of flood water and effectively reduce the peak flow to 19.9 cfs during a high rainfall event. Effectively the post construction peak inflow hydrograph of 59.2 cfs is dampened to 19.9 cfs with additional storage capacity in the existing wet pond. This represents a 30% reduction in pre -development and post - development, 28.7 cfs to 19.9 cfs, peak flow conditions. A riser pipe of 24" diameter and 4.0 feet high will serve as the principle spillway for the basin. Since it is desired to maintain water in the pond at all times, no dewatering hole IN is specified at the base of the riser, as would typically be done in storm water retention basins. Therefore, no outflow from the pond would occur until the water surface rose above the top of the riser pipe. The proposed volume/elevation relationship is included in the attachment page 12. Since the maximum water surface elevation attained in the pond during the design storm is 164.61 feet, this should serve as the maximum pond elevation prior to outflow through an emergency spillway. The emergency spillway -_ should be designed by the project engineer. At the maximum design water surface elevation (164.61 ft), a pond storage capacity of approximately 115,501 cubic feet is MW i Ms. Debra A. Bell April 26, 1999 Page 3 specified. It should be noted that as the water surface in the pond initially rises above the top of the 4' vertical riser pipe, the riser performs as a circular weir. At greater depths, control of flow is shifted to the conduit pipe conveying the water. The result of the proposed storm water retention structure at the IDX site is a reduction to 19.9 cfs of the peak discharge from the site. For the North Brook Watershed as a whole, the peak discharge is decreased from its existing level (122.0 cfs existing, 120.5 cfs proposed, with additional retention). Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Dori Barton Staff Scientist Attachments CC'. Mr. Ray Belair, City Planner Mr. John Caulo, Kessel/Duff UADHAR.TONUDX\IDXRMDOC.doc i Permit Number 3347-9010 Project ID Number EJ98-0330.07 VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER GENERAL PERMIT 3-9010 A determination has been made that the applicant: IDX Systems Corporation PO Box 1070 Burlington VT 05402 meets the criteria necessary for inclusion under General Permit 3-9010. Here after the named applicant shall be referred to as the permittee. Subject to the conditions of General Permit No. 3-9010, the permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater from IDX Systems Corporation, Software Systems located on Route 7 in South Burlington, Vermont to North Brook as previously described in Individual Permit No. 1-0512: Manner of Discharge: SIN 001: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, parking and roadways, collected in a catch basin system to "wet pond" stormwater management system, then discharging via a controlled outlet structure to a Swale which in 'turn discharges to North Brook Compliance with General Permit 3-9010 and this Authorization The permittee shall comply with this authorization and all the terms and conditions of General Permit 3-9010, including the payment of annual operating fees to the Department. A billing statement for such fees will be sent to the permittee each year. The first year's -statement is enclosed. Any permit non-compliance, including a failure to pay the annual operating fee, constitutes a violation of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47 and may be grounds for an enforcement action or revocation of this authorization to discharge. Transferability This authorization to discharge is not transferable to any person except in compliance with Part VI.D. of General Permit 3-9010. A copy of General -Permit 3-9010 is available from the Department via the internet at http://www.vtwateEguality.orWStonnwater/GenPennitUgimpaired W aters.ydf. Changes to Permitted Development In accordance with Part V.G. of General Permit 3-9010, the permittee shall notify the Department of any planned development or facility expansions or changes that may result in new or increased stormwater discharges. The Department shall determine the appropriateness of continued inclusion under General Permit 3-9010 by the modified development or facility. Semi -Annual Inspection and Report The stormwater collection, treatment and control system authorized herein shall be properly operated and maintained and shall be inspected at least twice per year, once in the spring after snowmelt and one in the fall prior to snow fall. The inspection shall evaluate the operation and maintenance and condition of the stormwater collection, treatment and control system. The permittee shall prepare a semiannual inspection report on a form available from the Department. The permittee shall, by November If" and June I" of each year, submit an inspection report to the Department. Restatement of Compliance Every 3 years, the permittee shall submit to the Department a written statement signed by a designer that the stormwater collection, treatment and control system authorized herein is properly operating and maintained. The first re -statement of compliance is due March 22, 2007. Failure to submit a designer's restatement of compliance shall constitute a violation of General Permit 3-9010 and may result_in the revocation of this- authorization to discharge. Filing of this Authorization with Local Land Records In accordance with Part VI.M. of General Permit 3-9010, the permittee shall file a copy of this authorization to discharge in the land records within seven (7) days of its issuance and a copy of the recording shall be provided to the Department within fourteen (14) days of the permittee's receipt of a copy of the recording from the local land records. Effective Date and Expiration Date of this Authorization This authorization to discharge shall become effective on March 22, 2004 and shall continue until August 5, 2010. The permittee shall reapply for coverage at least sixty (60) days prior to August 5, 2010. Dated at Waterbury, VT this Ind day of A,o_p_r,6. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BYVL� Wallace McLean, Director Water Quality Division RM DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC WILLIAM W.SCHROEDER bschroeder@drm.com Fax:(802) 862-7512 May 10, 2005 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Final Plat Application No. SD-04-73 Dear Ray: We are delivering to you with this letter the following final plat application materials, to reinstitute the planned unit development approval previously granted for the expansion of the IDX campus: Two signed originals of the Application for Final Subdivision Plat Review, with the following attachments: - Letter with comments from the South Burlington Water Department - Letter from Trudell Consulting Engineers submitting storm water data to the City's consultant for the Bartlett Brook Watershed - Revised plant list prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers for 40 IDX Drive - Plant list previously prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers for 35 Green Mountain Drive - Letter from Resource Systems Group confirming continued validity of 1999 traffic study assumptions. 2. Five full-size copies of the plan sets for 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT 0 ST. JOHNSBURY, VT 0 BRATTLEBORO, VT 0 MONTPELIER, VT 0 LITTLETON, NH ■ WWW.DRM.COM C C" Mr. Raymond J. Belair May 10, 2005 Page 2 3. One reduced (11" by 17") copy of each plan set. 4. Our firm check in the amount of $510.00 for the application fee. IDX has revised and supplemented the plan set to address the requirements of the preliminary plat approval issued by the Development Review Board on April 8, 2005, as follows: i. The site plans for 40 IDX Drive have been revised to show dropped curbs at the access points and dumpster locations (Sheets SP3 and SP4), to show erosion control details in a separate sheet (Sheet SPSE), and to address the comments of the South Burlington Water Department. ii. The planting plans for 40 IDX Drive (Sheets SP3A and SP3B) have been revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist, with corresponding changes to the landscaping cost calculations. iii. The site plan for 35 IDX Drive has been revised to reduce the proposed overall coverage from 43,575 square feet to 43,528 square feet. iv. The plan set includes an exterior elevation prepared by Freeman French Freeman, showing the building heights above average pre -construction grade shown (somewhat lower than estimated in the preliminary plat application). The official contact person for this application is still Peter Smichenko, the Director of Corporate Services and Facilities for IDX Systems Corporation. However, please contact me if you need any additional materials to complete this application. Thanks very much. Very truly yours, q&ALIM4¢ William W. Schroeder Encs. -I, NWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC vpp Pam'' �r4 18 October, 2004 Mr. Peter Smichenko IDX, Corp. 25 Green Mountain Dr South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr Smichenko, At your request, we have reviewed our 30 June, 1999 traffic impact study to determine whether its findings are still valid, despite the delay in construction of Phase II of IDX's expansion project. To assess whether the conclusions in our study are still valid we have evaluated several important assumptions and whether the basis for those assumptions have significantly changed. These are summarized in the following table: ASSUMPTION CHANGE SINCE 1999 Expected employment No significant changes to the projections have been made Access and Egress Points There have been no changes to the proposed plan. The Shelburne Road Improvements are currently under construction. Traffic Volumes on US 7 The 1999 traffic study assumed a 1.3% per year growth rate. The latest information from VTrans at Automatic Traffic Recorder Station D431, just south of Green Mountain Drive, shows that the average daily traffic declined from 24,900 in 1998 to 22,700 in 2002. The VTrans counts in 2002 were made prior to the start of construction of the US 7 improvements. Safety The 0.3 mile section north of Green Mountain Drive was a High Accident Location in 1998, with an actual to critical ratio of 1.131. The latest VTrans crash data from 1998 to 2002 shows an actual to critical ratio of 1.052. This represents a 7% decline. The Shelburne Road improvements currently under construction are expected to significantly lower the crash rate in this segment. Mitigation Measures The 1999 traffic study recommended optimizing signal timings when IDX reaches full capacity. No changes are made to that recommendation. 331 Glcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 t c:. 802.295.4999 • PkxS02.295.1006 • vvvvw.rsgir)c corn Mr. Peter Smichenko 18 October, 2004 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 I conclude that there have been no changes to the assumptions used in our 1999 traffic study that would a affect our mitigation recommendations or our conclusion that the project will no cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding streets and highways. Sincerely, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Kenneth Kaliski, P.E. Director of Environmental Services W SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 April 4, 2005 Trudell Consulting Engineers Ms. Deborah Bell PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 ' 11 South Burlington Dear Deborah: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As this project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. Please add the following wording to future plans in visible locations: "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District the City of South Burlington Colchester Fire District #1, and the Village of Jericho", henceforth the "CWD Specification." All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 4. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 5. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 6. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 7. You have indicated that the proposed building at 200 IDX Drive will be served from the existing six-inch water stub. A new water meter shall be required for this addition based upon the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water Allocation request in number one above. If there is to be any water service to the proposed parking garage the Water Allocation application should include that buildings expected water demand as well as that for the proposed building addition. Meter size will also be determined by the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water. Allocation request. 8. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 9. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 10. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 11. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 12. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent Enc. CC. Brian Robertson Doug Brent Plan Reviews: IDX Addition 4-05 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 April 4, 2005 Trudell Consulting Engineers Ms. Deborah Bell PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: IDX South Burlington Dear Deborah: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As this project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. Current water distribution system upgrades have been substantially completed that should allow for the construction of your project, pending approval of all other local and State requirements. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. Please add the following wording to future plans in visible locations: "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances for all Water Systems Owned by the Champlain Water District, the City of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District #1, and the Village of Jericho", henceforth the "CWD Specification." All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with these specifications. 4. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on backflow protection devices. 5. No underground utility shall be installed within four feet from the water main on either side, from the top of the main to the finish grade, with the exception of storm sewer and sanitary sewer as stated in the above referenced Specifications. Generally, trees shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. 6. Separation between the water main and service line and nearby sanitary and storm sewer lines shall comply with the VT WSR requirements and the above referenced Specifications. 7. You have indicated that the proposed building at 200 IDX Drive will be served from the existing six-inch water stub. A new water meter shall be required for this addition based upon the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water Allocation request in number one above. If there is to be any water service to the proposed parking garage the Water Allocation application should include that buildings expected water demand as well as that for the proposed building addition. Meter size will also be determined by the interior plumbing and user demands provided in the Water Allocation request. 8. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 9. The SBWD shall be sent any future hard copy plans involving this project for review. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in the above referenced Specifications. 10. The SBWD shall be notified prior to backfilling to inspect all joints, fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, water line crossings, and testing. 11. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. 12. A hard copy set of As-Builts as well as one electronic copy in Auto-CAD.DWG Version 14 Format or newer shall be supplied to this department upon completion of the water system improvements. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, F` Jay Nadeau Superintendent Enc. CC. Brian Robertson Doug Brent Plan Reviews: IDX Addition 4-05 April 14, 2005 Megan Moir Heindel and Noyes P.O. Box 4503 Burlington, Vermont 05406 RE: IDXSystems corporation Preliminary Plat Decision #SD-05-19 Dear Megan: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS(ME) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com Pursuant to the Preliminary Plat Approval #SD-05-19, dated April 8, 2005, enclosed please find information related to stormwater discharge for 40 IDX Drive and 3 5 Green Mountain Drive. The landowner and applicant for each parcel is IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, Vermont. The review request for each parcel is as follows: • 40 IDX Drive IDX Systems Corporation was issued a Stormwater Discharge Permit 1-0512, dated July 8, 1999, granting permission to discharge treated and controlled stormwater runoff from roadways, parking and roofs from the IDX Office Complex on Shelburne Road, in South Burlington, Vermont to a tributary of North Brook. The existing stormwater management system was permitted and constructed for the complete build out of the IDX Campus. A General Permit for discharge 3347-9010 was received on March 22, 2004, for continued operation of the stormwater management system. IDX Systems Corporation opted to phase the full build out of campus over several years, and as a result the City permits expired. Therefore, a permit renewal for construction at 40 IDX Drive is before the City Development Review Board. The existing stormwater system was permitted and constructed for the complete build out of the IDX Campus in the year 2000. Enclosed are the following items for your review: 1. Site plan drawings from the 2000 approval SP2 and SP3 last revised 5\26\00 and 4\17\00, respectfully. 2. Site plans currently being reviewed are sheets SP3 and SP4 last revised 4\08\05. The drawings illustrate that the scope of work for the project has not changed. 3. A copy of the Executive Stormwater Summary prepared in 1999. 4. A copy of Heindel and Noyes Report dated 4\26\99. 5. Discharge Permit 1-0512 and General permit 3347-9010. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting • 35 Green Mountain Drive The current development at 35 Green Mountain Drive consists of an office building with associated parking on 1.63 acres. The permittee is proposing demolition of the existing site improvements (office building, parking lot) and replacing the improvements with an employee parking lot. The parameters for the redesign are as follows: • The existing impervious area is 44,777 square feet. • The impervious area has been reduced to 43,528 square feet. • The current stormwater runoff sheet flows offthe impervious surfaces and is collected in a closed catch basin system prior to discharging to the City catch basin system. The loading dock area and a portion of the roof appear to sheet flow to the south, across vegetation prior to reaching the City catch basin system This project discharges to North Brook - The new employee parking lot will improve on water quality with 3 7 percent of the impervious area street flowing to a grassed swale prior to discharging to a catch basin system connected to the City system Enclosed are the following items for your review: 1. Existing conditions plan and the proposed site plan. 2. Original Temporary Pollution Permit 2-0908. 3. General Permit 3019-9010. 4. Correspondence with Padraic Monks, regarding permit amendments. Please review the enclosed information and provide response to Prehminwy Plat Decision #SDI-05-19, condition #5. Should you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Very truly yours, UDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) I Debra A Bell Project Manager Encl. cc. David Main, Brad Carter heuzMmy,es1D1.dcc File No. 04-14 PIN. EJ98-3402 Permit No. 1-0512 -STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AMENDED DISCHARGE PERMIT STORMWATER RUNOFF TO WATERS OF THE STATE In compliance with provisions of 10 V.S.A. 1263 and 10 V.S.A. 1264 BDP Realty Assoc. c/o IDX Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 and in accordance with "Terms and Conditions" hereinafter specified, the above named permittee is hereby granted permission to discharge treated and controlled stormwater runoff from the roadways, parking, and roofs from the "IDX Office Complex", Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT to an unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 1. Expiration Date: March 31, 2004. Note: This permit, unless revoked, shall be valid until the designated expiration date despite any intervening change in water quality, effluent, or treatment standards of the classification of the receiving waters, including groundwater. However, any such changed standard or classification shall be applied in determining whether or not to renew the permit pursuant to 10 V.S.A. 1263. Re -apply for a discharge permit by September 30, 2003. 2. Revocation: 10 V.S.A. 1267 provides as follows: "The Secretary may revoke any permit issued by him pursuant to this subchapter if he finds that the permit holder submitted false or inaccurate information in his application or has violated any requirement, restriction, or condition of the permit issued. Revocation shall be effective upon actual notice thereof to the permit holder." 3. Operating Fees: This discharge is subject to operating fees. The permittee shall submit the operating fees in accordance with procedures provided by the Secretary. 4. Transfer of Permit: This permit is not transferable without prior written approval of the Secretary. All application and operating fees shall be paid in full prior to transfer of this permit. The permittee shall notify the Secretary immediately, in writing, of any sale, lease, or other transfer of ownership of the property from which the discharge originates. The permittee shall provide a copy of this permit to the new owner or tenant and shall inform the new owner Permit #1-0512 Page 2 of or tenant of his responsibility to make application for a permit which shall be issued in his name. Any failure to do so shall be considered a violation of this permit. 5. Right of EntrX : The permittee shall allow the Secretary or their authorized representative, upon presentation of credentials, to enter the permittee's premises where the effluent sources authorized by this permit are located and at reasonable times to have access to copy any record: required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit, and to inspect any treatment device, monitoring equipment, or monitoring method required in this permit, and to sample an} discharge of pollutants. 6. Receiving Waters: Unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 7. Manner of Discharge: SIN 001: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, parking and roadways, collected in a catchbasi system to "wet pond" stormwater management system, then discharging via a controlled outlet structure to a swale which in turn discharges to an unnamed tributary of Bartlett Brook. 8. Wastes Permitted: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, roadways, and parking areas after treatment and control via stormwater detention ("wet") pond. 9. Volumes Permitted and Frequency of Discharge: Such volumes and frequency as1equired by the discharges specified in No. 6 above 10. Approved Project Design: Treatment as specified in No. 7. above. The project shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the Truduell Consutling Engineers, Inc. plan sheet specified below, and supporting information: Sheets SP1 and SP2, dated 11/12/98 last revised 4/15/99 Sheet SP3 dated 11/12/98 last revised 5/04/99 Sheet D3.dated 11/12/98 last revised 12/22/98 , Sheet D6 dated 01/21/99 last revised 05/14/99 Via reference the above noted plans are made a part of this permit. 11. Maintenance and Maintenance Reporting Requirements: a. All basins, swales, and related stormwater devices shall be maintained in good operating order at all times and shall be inspected biannually and shall be cleaned as necessary to maintain design specifications. b. Any sediment removed from the swales, or the detention basin shall be disposed of properly and not within 100 feet of Waters of the State. Permit #1-0512 Page 3 of 4 C. By SEPTEMBER 30 OF EACH YEAR a written report shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Conservation, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, VT 05671-0405. This report shall included, as a minimum: i. the dates and details of cleaning and maintenance operations carried out in the preceding year. ii. a narrative summarizing the results of any inspections conducted in the preceding year and highlighting stormwater related problems encountered during the preceding year. d. Should any erosional problems occur, the permittee is required to immediately correct any such problems. e. Any basins, swales or related stormwater devices used during construction for erosion control shall be inspected and cleaned to design specifications immediately after construction has been completed. 12. Personnel and Training Requirements: Such personnel and training as necessary to fulfill the requirements of # 10 above. 13. Monitoring and reporting Requirement: No monitoring required; reporting requirement as specified in #10 above. 14. Other Requirements: a. Treated stormwater runoff is the only waste authorized for disposal under the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge for any hazardous materials or hazardous waste into the stormwater management system is prohibited. b. The issuance of this permit does not relieve the pernttee from obtaining coverage under General Permit 3-9001, if applicable. 14. Issue Date of Permit: AGE CY OYNATURAL RESOURCES Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Fyn J. Davis, 15ire6t r" Wastewater Management Division No Text SUMMARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN For BDP REALITY ASSOCIATES I. INTRODUCTION BDP Realty Associates obtained Stormwater Discharge Permit #1-0512 on November 3, 1987, for Interpretive Data Systems (currently IDX) located at 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont. The permit allowed them to discharge stormwater from the site to the North Brook portion of the Bartlett Brook Watershed. This stormwater analysis was prepared in order to minimize hydrologic impacts to downstream waterways and to prevent water quality degradation and adverse impact to the stormwater flow characteristics of the watershed. Both the pre -development condition of 1986 and the proposed campus build out were analyzed using Haestead TR-55 Hydrologic Method to determine pre and post development peak stormwater runoff volumes. Hydrologic computations were made using a 2 year 24 hour storm event and a Type R rainfall distribution The 25-year storm event was also analyzed to comply with the City of South Burlington's, Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District, IT. SITE DESCRIPTION The study area involves 27.51 acres, 10.83 acres of which are located upslope of the site and the balance is 16.68 acres of site area. The parcel is bound to the north by Holmes Avenue Extension (IDX Drive), to the east by Green Mountain Drive, to the south by Heritage Motors and to the west by Shelburne Road. The property originally (1986) was mixed pasture and scrub woodland. The land has a gentle slope of 2 to 6 percent west to the discharge point (S/N001) of the site which is a 42 inch reinforced concrete pipe flowing west across Shelburne Road. The IDX site is underlain by soils of the following SCS groups: Enosburg & Whately, Belgrade, Adams, and Covington. IIL DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATIONS — PRE -DEVELOPMENT The IDX site and the watershed area upgradient has been analyzed for the 1986 pre -development condition that was mixed pasture and scrub woodland. The site is located in drainage area PREB86 and the offsite contribution is drainage area PREA86 (refer to drainage map #1). The predevelopment TR 55 curve number and time of concentration were computed as the following: Drainage Area Acres CN - Tc ,_?�S 3i, WA PREB86 (site) 16.68 81 0.1858 Stormwater from these areas travel overland to a small farm drainage swale to the discharge point S/N001, which is the 42 inch culvert crossing at Route 7. The pre -development peak flow at the discharge point was determined to be 15.72 cfs at critical t=12.00, using a typical 2 year 24 hour design storm event and a Type H rainfall distribution. IV. DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATIONS — POST -DEVELOPMENT Post -development peak flows were estimated by first delineating three drainage areas that are based on the closed drainage system direction and the proposed project expansion These areas are labeled on the enclosed drainage map. Post -development peak flow from a 2 year 24 hour storm event was calculated to be 27.3 cfs. It is therefore necessary to incorporate stormwater detention into the system to reduce the post - development peak flow from the site to allowable pre -development levels. Following is a description of each of the post development areas: 1. Drainage area 98051 POST2 consists of 7.79 acres of which 3.78 acres is landscaped with dense lawn. Approximately 3.08 acres is pavement and 0.93 acres of building roof. The runoff from this area begins either as overland flow to a closed catch basin system or sheet flows off the current parking lots into grassed swales which convey the runoffto the closed catch basin system This closed system extends around the northside the existing building and discharges into the wet pond. Sediment treatment is achieved in the grassed swales , the sediment shelf at the discharge point and in the wet pond. The post development peak flow from this drainage area was calculated to be 7.12 cfs. (S/N00I) 2. Drainage area 98051POST3 consists of 8.89 acres ofwhich 6.65 acres is pavement requiring treatment and the balance is 1.02 acres of building and 1.22 acres of landscaping and dense lawn The runoff from this area sheet flows offthe pavement into a closed catch basin system, which extends around the southside of the proposed development and discharges into the southern wet pond. A sediment shelf has been designed at the discharge point to help remove sediment prior to the wet pond. The post development peak flow from this drainage area was calculated to be 20.97 cfs. (S/N001) 3. Drainage area 98051POS 1 consists of 10.83 acres which is undeveloped. The runoff from this area travels overland then is picked up in the drainage system in IDX Drive and is discharged into the wet pond. The post development peak flows from this drainage area is calculated to be 0.0 cfs. (S/N001) Table 2 summarizes the peak discharge information from the post -developed site. V. DISCHARGE SUMMARY Currently the stormwater runoff from the existing development discharges into a wet pond located in front of the building along Route 7 at SNOW. This wet pond has a bottom elevation 158.00 and a water surface elevation of 164.9. The controlling outlet is an 18 inch cmp riser with a 12 inch discharge pipe. The peak discharge from the site is currently 16.0 cfs. The new expansion proposal is to utilize and expand the existing pond to 55,486 cu. ft. (see attached) and construct a second wet pond to the south with 31,483 cu. ft., and a 15 inch pipe connecting the two (total cu. ft. 86,970). The bottom elevation of the wet pond will be 158.0 and the normal stage elevation will be set at 162.0. The existing outlet structure will be replaced with an inline water level control structure which has stop logs placed inside the box at a width of 24 inches to reduce the post development peak discharge from the 2 year 24 hour storm event to 7.13 cfs. The peak water elevation will be 163.77 feet. An emergency spillway has been designed at the outlet and the spillway elevation is set at 165.5 feet. Detailed Hydrologic computations and design drawings are included with this Executive Summary. • Consulting Hydrogeologists rs VN Heindel and Noyes • Enn�onmental Scientists PO. Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 05406A709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 April 26, 1999 Ms. Debra A. Bell Trudell Consulting Engineers, INC. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: IDX 1998/1999 Expansion Dear Debra: This letter/report presents the results of our hydrologic evaluation for the final plans for the proposed IDX expansion project on Shelburne Road. This report updates the analysis presented in our letter/report dated January 21, 1999. The proposed development is located within the North Brook portion of the Bartlett Brook watershed. The analysis was performed using information provided by your office for the project site. This included the computation of existing and proposed impervious area, and the identification of relevant soil types. Heindel and Noyes computed a hydraulic curve number for post development conditions and the data was input into the existing data file for the entire watershed. An evaluation was performed for the 2-year and 24-year, 24-hour storms, which result in 2.2 and 4.0 inches of rainfall, respectively, in South Burlington. To evaluate the overall impact of the proposed expansion on the watershed, peak discharge rates have been computed at four locations. Peak discharge rates are calculated for three different scenarios: pre -development, post -development and post - development with an enlarged detention basin. At the outflow of the site, the projected peak discharge rate is 29.8 cfs for the existing condition. For the post -development condition, a significant increase in peak discharge is projected (59.2 cfs). Peak flows are predicted to decrease to 19.9 cfs with the expansion of the existing wet pond on site. At the point where North Brook crosses Shelburne Road, the peak discharge rate is 155.1 cfs, 186.6 cfs and 143.6 cfs for pre - development conditions, post -development conditions, and post -development conditions with an enlarged detention pond. At the point where North Brook crosses the railroad tracks (adjacent to the Bartlett Bay Sewage Treatment Plant), the peak discharge rates are 197.6 cfs, 232.0 cfs and 185.5 cfs for pre -development conditions, post -development conditions and post -development conditions with an enlarged wet pond, respectively. At the base of the watershed (Bartlett Bay), the peak discharge rates are 121.5 cfs and 120.5 cfs for pre -development and post -development conditions with an expanded wet pond, respectively. The model projects that the increased runoff 0 DI Ms. Debra A. Bell April26, 1999 Page 2 from the IDX expansion without an expanded pond would result in flooding of the stream channel at the base of the watershed. A summary of peak discharge rates at these various points in the watershed for pre-, post- and post -development conditions with an enlarged pond is attached. Also attached are schematic drawings of pre- and post- development drainage scenarios. This information is summarized in the following table. Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates Location Pre -Development Post -Development Post -Development Conditions Conditions Conditions w/ IDS) WS) Expanded Pond Site Outlet 28.3 59.2 WS) 19.9 Shelburne Road Culvert 155.1 186.6 143.6 Railroad Tracks Culvert 197.6 232.0 185.5 Base of Watershed 121.5 NA 120.5 A significant increase in peak discharge is projected throughout the watershed as a result of the proposed expansion. Based on these results, it is our conclusion that the storm water management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission for the Bartlett Brook/North Brook watershed would be better met with the expansion of the, existing storm water detention pond on the IDX site. Modeling of the site and its immediate watershed (30 acres) projects an increase from 29.8 cfs (existing site conditions) to 59.2 cfs peak discharge rate during the 25-year 24- hour storm event. This assumes that the runoff from the existing development is directed towards the existing detention pond and that storm water runoff from the expansion is not contained within a detention pond but introduced directly to the stream. It was calculated that the existing wet pond expanded to a bottom area of 9,450 square feet, total depth of 8 feet, a desired stage of 48 inches and a 24" orifice could adequately contain 115,501 cubic feet of flood water and effectively reduce the peak flow to 19.9 cfs during a high rainfall event. Effectively the post construction peak inflow hydrograph of 59.2 cfs is dampened to 19.9 cfs with additional storage capacity in the existing wet pond. This represents a 30% reduction in pre -development and post - development, 28.7 cfs to 19.9 cfs, peak flow conditions. A riser pipe of 24" diameter and 4.0 feet high will serve as the principle spillway for the basin. Since it is desired to maintain water in the pond at all times, no dewatering hole is specified at the base of the riser, as would typically be done in storm water retention basins. Therefore, no outflow from the pond would occur until the water surface rose above the top of the riser pipe. The proposed volume/elevation relationship is included in the attachment page 12. Since the maximum water surface elevation attained in the pond during the design storm is 164.61 feet, this should serve as the maximum pond elevation prior to outflow through an emergency spillway. The emergency spillway should be designed by the project engineer. At the maximum design water surface elevation (164.61 ft), a pond storage capacity of approximately 115,501 cubic feet is • Ms. Debra A. Bell April 26, 1999 Page 3 specified. It should be noted that as the water surface in the pond initially rises above the top of the 4' vertical riser pipe, the riser performs as a circular weir. At greater depths, control of flow is shifted to the conduit pipe conveying the water. OR The result of the proposed storm water retention structure at the IDX site is a reduction to 19.9 cfs of the peak discharge from the site. For the North Brook Watershed as a whole, the peak discharge is decreased from its existing level (122.0 cfs existing, 120.5 cfs proposed, with additional retention). Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Dori Barton Staff Scientist Attachments cc: Mr. Ray Belair, City Planner Mr. John Caulo, Kessel/Duff U:\DRARTON\IDX\IDXRMDOC.d.c Permit Number 3347-9010 Project ID Number E798-0330.07 VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER GENERAL PERMIT 3-9010 A determination has been made that the applicant: IDX Systems Corporation PO Box 1070 Burlington VT 05402 meets the criteria necessary for inclusion under General Permit 3-9010. Here after the named applicant shall be referred to as the penmittee. Subject to the conditions of General Permit No. 3-9010, the permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater from IDX Systems Corporation, Software Systems located on Route 7 in South Burlington, Vermont to North Brook as previously described in Individual Permit No. 1-0512: Manner of Discharge: SIN 001: Stormwater runoff from the buildings, parking and roadways, collected in a catch basin system to "wet pond" stormwater management system, then discharging via a controlled outlet structure to a swale which in 'turn discharges to North Brook Compliance with General Permit 3-9010 and this Authorization The permittee shall comply with this authorization and all the terms and conditions of General Permit 3-9010, including the payment of annual operating fees to the Department. A billing statement for such fees will be sent to the permittee each year. The first year's -statement is enclosed. Any permit non-compliance, including a failure to pay the annual operating fee, constitutes a violation of 10 V.S.A. Chapter 47 and may be grounds for an enforcement action or revocation of this authorization to discharge. Transferability This authorization to discharge is not transferable to any person except in compliance with Part VI.D. of General Permit 3-9010. A copy of General Permit 3-9010 is available from the Department via the internet at http://www.vtwaterqualiiy.org/Stonnwater/GenPermitUnimpairedW aters.pdf. Changes to Permitted Development In accordance with Part V.G. of General Permit 3-9010, the permittee shall notify the Department of any planned development or facility expansions or changes that may result in new or increased stormwater discharges. The Department shall determine the appropriateness of continued inclusion under General Permit 3-9010 by the modified development or facility. Semi -Annual Inspection and Report The stormwater collection, treatment and control system authorized herein shall be properly operated and maintained and shall be inspected at least twice per year, once in the spring after snowmelt and one in the fall prior to snow fall. The inspection shall evaluate the operation and maintenance and condition of the stormwater collection, treatment and control system. The permittee shall prepare a semiannual inspection report on a form available from the Department. The permittee shall, by November 1" and June 15` of each year, submit an inspection report to the Department. Restatement of Compliance Every 3 years, the permittee shall submit to the Department a written statement signed by a designer that the stormwater collection, treatment and control system authorized herein is properly operating and maintained. The first re -statement of compliance is due March 22, 2007. Failure to submit a designer's restatement of compliance shall constitute a violation of General Permit 3-9010 and may result in the revocation of this authorization to discharge. Filing of this Authorization with Local Land Records In accordance with Part VLM. of General Permit 3-9010, the permittee shall file a copy of this authorization to discharge in the land records within seven (7) days of its issuance and a copy of the recording shall be provided to the Department within fourteen (14) days of the permittee's receipt of a copy of the recording from the local land records. Effective Date and Expiration Date of this Authorization This authorization to discharge shall become effective on March 22, 2004 and shall continue until August S, 2010. The permittee shall reapply for coverage at least sixty (60) days prior to August 5, 2010. Dated at Waterbury, VT this aid day of 1'�0.,,.�,(� 2004 - -- -- Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By VJ AAjVC_j_-- Wallace McLean, Director Water Quality Division SCIENTIFIC NAME Amelanchier Grandifloria Robin Hill' Gleditsia Triacanthos Imperial" Pinus nigra PLANT LIST 40 /DX "100 Bldg. Parking Expansion" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect Last Revised 112812005 COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE Robin Hill Serviceberry 27 1 1/2"- 1 3/4"' Imperial Honeylocust Austrian Pine 13 2 1 /2" - 3" 4 6' - 7' PRICE/PLANT* TOTAL $275.00 $7,425 $525.00 $6,825 $290.00 $1,160 SUB TOTAL $15,410 Concrete Wall 5,500 SQ.FT. $30.00 $165,000 (Retaining existing vegetation) TOTAL $180,410 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 4/27/2005 PLANT LIST 40 IDX "Parking Garage" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect Last Revised 4/26/2005 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Forsythia ovata Gleditsia triacanthos ' Imperial' Malus 'Coralburst' Pinus nigra Quercus palustris Ulmus americana 'Princeton' PRICE/PLANT" TOTAL Autumn Blaze Maple 4 21/2"-3" $550.00 $2,200.00 Early Forsythia 54 3 gal. $37.50 $2,025.00 Imperial Honeylocust 2 2 1/2"-3" $525.00 $1,050.00 Coralburst Crabapple 10 4'-5' $225.00 $2,250.00 Austrian Pine 12 6'-7' $290.00 $3,480.00 Pin Oak 13 21/2"-3" $587.00 $7,631.00 Princeton American 3 21/2"-3" $638.00 $1,914.00 Elm TOTAL $20,550.00 The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 4/27/2005 PLANT LIST I DX 35 Green Mountain Drive Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 116105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT'` TOTAL Acer x freemanii Autumn Blaze Map Autumn Blaze' Gleditsia triacanthos Imperial Honeyloc Imperial' Malus 'Adams' Adams Crabapple Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 11 21/2"-3" $550.00 $6,050.00 6 21/2"-3" $512.50 $3,075.00 5 13/4"-2" $400.00 $2,000.00 6 7'-8' $345.00 $2,070.00 TOTAL $13,195.00 The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. i kir"(tt"12 A" SYS'fli.tis G110V P, INC.. 18 October, 2004 Mr. Peter Smichenko IDX, Corp. 25 Green Mountain Dr South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr Smichenko, At your request, we have reviewed our 30 June, 1999 traffic impact study to determine whether its findings are still valid, despite the delay in construction of Phase II of IDX's expansion project. To assess whether the conclusions in our study are still valid we have evaluated several important assumptions and whether the basis for those assumptions have significantly changed. These are summarized in the following table: ASSUMPTION CHANGE SINCE 1999 Expected employment No significant changes to the projections have been made Access and Egress Points There have been no changes to the proposed plan. The Shelburne Road Improvements are currently under construction. Traffic Volumes on US 7 The 1999 traffic study assumed a 1.3% per year growth rate. The latest information from VTrans at Automatic Traffic Recorder Station D431, just south of Green Mountain Drive, shows that the average daily traffic declined from 24,900 in 1998 to 22,700 in 2002. The VTrans counts in 2002 were made prior to the start of construction of the US 7 improvements. Safety The 0.3 mile section north of Green Mountain Drive was a High Accident Location in 1998, with an actual to critical ratio of 1.131. The latest VTrans crash data from 1998 to 2002 shows an actual to critical ratio of 1.052. This represents a 7% decline. The Shelburne Road improvements currently under construction are expected to significantly lower the crash rate in this segment. Mitigation Measures The 1999 traffic study recommended optimizing signal timings when IDX reaches full capacity. No changes are made to that recommendation. 331 Glcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 i [:. 802,295-4999 • PAX 602,295.1006 • wvvvv.rscJinc.corn Mr. Peter Smichenko 18 October, 2004 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 I conclude that there have been no changes to the assumptions used in our 1999 traffic study that would a affect our mitigation recommendations or our conclusion that the project will no cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding streets and highways. Sincerely, Resource Systems Group, Inc. ,Yl Kenneth Kahski, P.E. Director of Environmental Services I 05/24i2005 08:28 802-87(9 ..d80 TRUDELL CONSULTIN.. PAGE 02 Notes, —t - Job: TV)( 35 a Ab t� 19u are�c�Zv1 i il l '�} l `1,Tu fj Type: FORM 10 ROUND ( CP/MP POST TOP MOUNT GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Post Top Mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CP) or semi -spherical (MP) sharp cutoff luminaires using high Intensity discharge lamps up to 1000 walls (400w in the MA). Housings are ono -place seamless spun aluminum and finished With either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostalically applied polyurethane Luminaires can accept one of eight (9 ) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. Optional twin glowrings at post tops are available in (4) Colors and are illuminated by the primary source. PREFIX MOUNTING DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS Enter the order code into the aWropiate box ;Cone Note. Gardeo rownitis the rlpnt to refuse a configuration. Not all combinations and configurations are rjIM. Rellin to notat below for exclusions and limitations. For questions or comems, please consult the Wtwy. v •P. I G U R A T 10 IN CP17 17" Spun Cylindrical Luminalr• MOUNTING: rasa TENa+s CP22 22- Spun Cylindrical Luminaire MPt7 '17" Spun Semi -Spherical Luminalre MP22 22- Spun Semi -Spherical Luminalre ! • 1 LIB;! Type I l&�sLrrra6 VS TYPO V 3 Type III SiOps.d Mm KfKz W GWdl baw 4X Type t v fzr p y) 2pGa — an 17" un.% Fri Typo IV FC3V" Full Cutoff Type III ® Type v FCVS" ruu culotr Tvpe v 72- 320?5MH ontr Sppdad aWaxv UFD2&LLcR'6,anp • 120 240 347 OUAC 206 277 480 f M20412W277, Fado y fW m Z77V BLA Black Anodized BRA Bronze Anodized NA Natural Anodized BRP Bronze Paint BLP Black Paint PEP Natural Aluminum PaInT WP White Paint OC Optional Color Paint 3oBCITy RAL dasgra m a Nwwr in Cab S&Won Ow&,, — OC RAL702A SC Special Golor Paint S(•�1i1•' MUOI AUHP'y Rkv [Mo. 4 SIS B _T T3 T4 oA. 3,se , 7 Mph I.D.. E2 o.o.3.as MAA'0c..ss 2.A O.D. x4 27180.0)KA so.D.x+ 40.0 x+ 44i:IN O.D. 3.60 MC22 u O.D. +.00MP17P12 a.1 WA T14 oia T16 as T1d iso NIA CP17 P22 m a N/A T24 911.4l t25 (Its) T26 (et.3) NIA MP22 P31 (10.6) P32 (u.2) P33 (wi; T74 gn.+l I T86 (e A) T34ta.q T37 (I(I,s} CP22 P41 (al,$) Dal (ale) P43 pill ITod ne.q I T47 ow-i) MZ A[1Z ! ElW "MI Saw 2"W 2%M Vk Meru' Nodes 7ili•1 701t•r 40ow 4091.11 7'34011" PA" Stint form Na" MPS NpA PvsO rs Smtsum IWW 1a1 m, loww"I Isew 1FAW 2WPSW I?SW 1751.1 2SOPSidd 32OPSWI, 20OW 1I MP91111" 3SMMM T. M.dno+a.. mno 25011N 17BPSt11,11iP JSOPSI•i u0P9M1" 9,A-4.2..IMI a mb 40OPM" 450P5111111 a CpmaO 53yrsmA 175P9w. MPS 450PSW S. Uaa. ei'37a E27ra+Ipt any 100MPS 7S0P W 350i1PS 6 Mr.y w+k M,r2v^nr0ps0r roqu,k Y3rt!bp3r$i/NDRrBP37 wrp la0HP5?' t0oolpsw" 400NPS 7,AwYE1U 0xn tX vVb rodra my s. Y137 ar 11:6P 7OMPS a. Yf 33 or N/53 iWHP9 2WHP9 o.Yr3aa Mrs. r1,Yr35aNf55 I56"P9' 401)NPS I2 Pon CP22 foOoW wAr ro.lc R.nw fo I" mr, 4 ow Do- 790H1'9' WARA411410: Use of *Flea ftrnpe mold& warranty r-.,. low Millar twkiii, I,aa: finsdid amdrdi2eft ANZWURI&MW Car low Ptdm YtiNT ule7 V—h" 53M M9lW0W?0"n7/9K ,@,�ae1 papygLCade CAL&glig"W GE. 18206 MV9100000"7 G_E 10S/D MVR10001ilw97+A1 Iv nru"o I&M AWIX WAVTT97 vertu,. dlirl M64f0Wh110ibT9s4+a F Fusing inNajd. IVAabo.a+o0w as Quartz Standby WAab.400w LF In-Llne/In•Pole Fusing SG Sag Glass Lens inoemofbtgrass With •X oPece ono PC Photocontrol and Receptacle CP22 50u� WA with MP units or dWV. GRC Glow Rings - Clear PCR PhatdoconPtro'lReceptacle only GRY Glow Rings - AlIlow POLY Poiyearbonate Sag Lens GRG Glow Rings - Groan In pau or ear puss. WA with AX ports. GRR Glow Rings - Red 750w or t000w units. HS Internal Houseside Shield SUPPMed stw*W w1h FM oPlics. WA Rb" 400w w10) Miller 00-. 0"� Ughil"g r. .+, kill Asir lu on°,.o. M11.,;.1° .1 memN le° 00°Ie" 01 ire Product wl IMI Gardco Lightln0 9001227-075e "gltkason a0 part or (he comp0ny'° 0Wdnuin0 prod= Imprwwrlent ploilmm. The +X opetal system 2b81 Alvarado Street 510/357.8901) in Calltornla Isplo(xeedbyU.S.Word MUnwersdeo+2a. San Leandro, CA 94577 Fax:510135'7-3088 O copyright Gardcp Ughiing 2001-2004, NI Rlgh(0 Reserved, I"lernalbnal COPyrigh( Setwas www.aitelighting.com LIGHTIN 79115.391204 05/24i2005 08:28 802-879-10 TRUDELL CONSULTINo PAGE 03 r� 11 111;`111111iiif� r . a ILI 0, SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL: Each Gardeo Form 10 post top mounted Hardtop is a cylindrical OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form Ten optical syslam is (CP) or semi -spherical (MP) sharp cutoff luminalre for high intensity discharge homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and lamps, Internal components are totally enclosed, rain -fight, dust -tight and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components Is patterns to achieve IES Types Ili), III (3/FC3V), IV (FM), and V (Q(VS/FCVS) required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no distributions. With the 4X optics, the reflector facets form a conical tan disassembly required for Installation, Larriping requires no lifting or hinging the around the arc tube with each facet positioned to be precisely tangent to luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. Optional the top of the arc tube. twin glow rings at post lop are available in (4) Colors and are illuminated by the primary downlight source, HOUSING: Housing is a one-piece, .100' seamless aluminum with an integral rolled circumferential reveal and lower section aperture Incorporating a returned flange stiitener to protect against housing edge deformation. Units are offered in profiles of 17' or 22' In diameter. YOKE: The 9/16' diameter parallel yokes of high strength, low mass schedule 40 steel are precision contoured to match the CP or MP housing silhouette. Welds or fasteners are not visible at the luminai►e or pole attachment The yoke is elecirogalvanized and coated with satin black polyurethane. LENS: One -place, die cast aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and Impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Type 4X and CP22 75DwiI000w luminaires feature sag glass lens and Type VS units employ a sag acrylic Ions. Concealed stainless steel hinge and two (2) flush A/ turn fasteners seaee terra ft assembly b the luminaire. .0►MENS10'NS CP Style EPA+s weight Size A 8 C Q Sln le Single 17" 17" 8" 10' 18' 7 31 22' 22' 11" 11' 2r 1.0 50 The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell - all securely attached to the reflector assembly, 50MH, 70MH and 100MH units have a medium base lampholder. All horizontal Metal Halide units in the 22' housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise are tube positioning. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20' F. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured within the luminaire, above the reflector system. CornponeriMcf-component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150' C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC,1 SA or higher. FINISH: Anodized housings are created with an Aluminum Aseoclallon AmMeetural Class I anodizing process to achieve a bronze, black or natural aluminum finish. Painted units are finished with hardcoat, fade resistant, electrostatically applied polyurethane. LABELS: Al futures beer UL or CLIL (wtlere appkable) Wet Location 4abew MP Style EPA's Walght Size A 9 C D Single Single 17" 17" 11' 10' 21' 7 31 22' 22' 14' 11' 25" 1.0 50 MOuldrING: It firla an 1IT Nw9al m 2 awpal m 3 Ytae tma Yaw pea Da. ra+ � oD lam J NOOrroa AOaCnmenl ynaa rile times yo" *. re., M.,hod —Pea vvtanp IIIuaVaton a aualrulbn 5 ero� Aft Asia" 1 Tow 7.1. Bltr r+a. anon yns Ae,` taw, vv rrma Refer to char) on opposlto 94o for mountlng Informa(ion. Gard- C,pMlrg no —it. tna right W change materials or modify the daalgn of Its product wllrout Gardeo Lighting 800/227.0758 1 IL W A I noauca4on as D.rr of aW oorrfpa % con.nubq oradarcl i np—isfent pnag— 11r q( oOcal ayate,n i. 26811 Alvarado Street 510/3S7.8e00 in Califomia o,owtsd W San Leandro. CA 94677 Faac: 510,"l57-3088 O Coppol 091dro Ligranvd 2001.2004, All Rights Reasrred. ln( .soonal copyright Sx rae. www,sitelighlIng.com uT A Panlyle, C—pany LI 1 } 1(� 79115.30l1204 1. 05/24/2005 08:28 802-879-10 TRUDELL CONSULTIN- PAGE 04 Notes' Job_ � Ax LY A cllhfi IAfV3 Avg b Type: - aul Li&"6 r-S-1-1tini- 10 BR 164/BR 162/BR 163 a�■i4 F a�� r� GENEAAL DESCAIMON- The Gardoo Bolla d 10 luminaires provide efficient low -glare illumination Irom a highly durable aaars■rrr■r seiamdess architectural form. tNlllzing the Form 10 hosted optical system, p!eCi99 beam control is achieved and diacvtrllorling ■..•nuomu l��la�rierYN■ bdghtnest is aliminatad. A .250' cast aluminum housing and .198' Injection molded acrylic lens aaeurea exceptional vandal ..%y e!rNot resistance. Each Gard+o SPI WIVJ163 is a bollard luminake olinng 50W through 175W high intensity discharge lamps. Unite a98L': ■r■rs.wntia are totally waled and gaskatad, preventing imrusion of moisture, dust and Insects into [he lamp or eleAdcal ctramtvm .L "a .�� • i PREFIX OPTICS HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FffdISH OPTIONS Enm thr order cede Iran the appropnels bm ebuve. Note. GaMco rsservas to r[gm ro mkw a ronfigurallon. Not aH comdnatma end oonfigunmors are VOW. Reler ro novs below for exclusions wo Ikiviabot6. Foe gimb" of concern, please cormh fie iectoty. SR160 Head Only 3 Type III 42" DnI62,, 1830* SR162 with Aluminum Baas FM Type IV 14, BIi160 C4Vr BR163 with Natural Concrete Base 0 7jrpe V BRIG38 with Beige Concrole Base BR1630 with Grey Concrete Base V O' SOMH 60iHPSI 120 70MH 70MPS AdH Mww ".9M 206 10014lH 100HPS HPS hW Pro"wo SOWUm 240 150MH 160HPS 175MH 1 I2o277V Prlrn■ry .-,1y 277 SRP Bronze Paint OC Optional Color Paint BLP Black Paint Aic* Au `%N "te WP While Paint SC Special color Paint NP Natural Aluminum Paint spwej Wur uwp cMr ce VP Verde Careen Paint F Furling DUP Duplex Receptacle eeathartrght shah -mounted In lorter housing GFCI GyFCI Receptacle aeern rdph; Auslretwntrd In &,mr wusirg a...ko Lqn" r■aww• t -em . en. u m d,ty ma 1-a of ne ONdW wiewut Gerdeo L1QMtng SM227-0768 rurabasm u pens trs w.,pwix`a co.wnwnp pw"k tmpt progrsm. 2981 Ahrerado Street 51 W3574900 In California a co ogre oarom Lviong zw+-aoa. ui RWU Fia"M-va. in—adonu crp/rgni SM—A San Leandro, CA 94S77 Fez: 51 W357-3098 www-sit®ngl)ting.com "iTING q o■Nyt■ Cor/oerty 79115-31MM$ 05,124I2005 08:29 802-879 10 TRUDELL CONSULTIf NAGI� e BOLLARD 10 UPPER HOUSING: Housing sections are .25o' wall seamless cast textured aggregate finish. Assembly is secured and leveled to the aluminum. Lens is one piece .188" thick Injection molded clear non- mounting foundation with four (4) 3r8' X 8' X 1 1/2' anchor bolts on a 17 yellowing DR acrylic secured between upper and lower housing sections 112" bolt circle. Base is designed for 7' direct burial. with throe (31 1/2' diameter chrome plated steel posts. Silicone gasketing allows for thermal expansion while maintaining a wealhertight operation of the optical system. LOWER HOUSINOIANCHORAGE: IMM Head -only luminairs is designed for mounting on concrete pedestal or architectural elements (by others). Mounting plate is cast aluminum with slots to accept anchor bolts (by others) al 90" an a 12 1/4' diameter bolt circle. Ballast Is attached to the mounting plate, ORM 16" diameter mounting base is .125" wall aluminum, Integral cast aluminum top section is secured to the mounting foundation with bur (4) 3/8" x 8' x 1 1/2' anchor bolts on 12 1/4' diameter bolt circle. Ballast mounting plate is positioned at the top of base, easily accessible for service_ OR188 Base assembly consists of 7 gauge (.179') x 19' diameter galvanized steel plate fastened to precast concrete base. The base is constructed with steel molds and wire reinforcing and is acid -etched to provide a smooth b:1;MENS10N5 T 14" 42' 16" - I l 6- a stub up area OPTICAL SYSTEM: The Form 10 optical system segments are formed from homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and precisely positioned in reflector pan to produce IES Types III (3), IV (FM) or V (0) distributions. Mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with nickel plated screw shell and is securely attached to the reflector assembly. 5oMH, 70MH, and 100MH units have medium base lampholders. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20° F. Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and Is listed by UL for use at GM VAC at 150"C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. FINISH: Each luminaire receives a lade and abrasion resistant electrostatically applied, thermally cured and lotured polyester powdetccat finish. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL or CUL (where applicable) wet Locadlon labels. NOTE: Factory supplied le nptate must be used when getting anchor bob, rdardoo Lighting will not honor arty claim for Incorrect enehorags filMmm irl from failure to as factory supplied lempides. ■gym■rrrrmoo ..'a .WE ■amteer.■.■ •ara■r■■rr.r "on VICE ■rrr■u■r■aa ..16' DiameMr .ral■uaawon ■■w■au Concrete Sao& IRMO me login :r:i ■am/IFlrr■■rur■ wrea■aa■rrr• o.■augrrana w.w■r■r■Wm■ r.r■■■■r■ar/ .■uuwwra r r go ■rwrn/E0m ■■w■mew■«1' ra/aoarao _ 12.25' BC27;, 17,5' BOY[ Circle 16' 11' Conduil EntranrB i 17' Diamalar 6' o stub up area Mounting plate Gold= ughtlno rowura the right to chap■ matarlala of mpolry mr dralgn of IL groduof wrlhoul Gardco Lighting 800227-075e a,h..�.v*^V• �°^a^uhvv k.4 t'^o•�'^"^' Qe81 AWamdo street S101357.60M In Call fornla ocKy.ghtomaouphmp2do1-zoo4.ArRofdaR-dImarrur9onrtcoownelr9amrrod. San Leandro, CA 9r577 Fax'S1oCl57-30at' www.eitelghtl g-cam LIGHTI A sardym Company 7015-21MQ! 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 5, 2005 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed,. please find a copy of the minutes from the April 5, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy 14�Donough Administrative Assistant Encl. �r PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 5, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Application #CU-05-04 of Richard T. & Rebecca B. Cassidy for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for a 598 sq it accessory residential unit, 5 Lyons Avenue. 2. Application #CU-05-04 of Richard T. & Rebecca B. Cassidy for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional ` Use Review, or the South 11 Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is to expand the building without increasing the building foot- q�' print, 5 Lyons Avenue. Y� I 3. Preliminary plat application I v #SD-05-19 of IDX Systems Corp. to amend a previously approved planned unit development con- sisting of a 233,133 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of Phase I to include: 1) adding three (3) floors to the west wing building containing 87,234 sq ft of general office use, and constructing 179 net new surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Dr., and 2) demolishing an existing 14,389 sq ft building, off -site parking approval and constructing new 126 space parking lot at 35 Green Mountain Dr. Phase III to include: 1). con- structing four (4) story west wing addition containing 64,025 sq ft of general office use at 40 IDX Dr, and 2) constructing a 565 space parking structure at 40 IDX Dr. to replace off -site Parking at 35 Green Mountain Dr. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board March 16, 2005 j E. David Crane P.O. Box 64853 Burlington, VT Bill Schroeder P.O. Box 190 05402 Burlington, VT 05402 Debra Bell Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 David Main IDX Systems Corp. P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 8, 2005 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corp. P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application #SD-05-19 Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on April 5, 2005 (effective 04/08/05). Please note the conditions, including that the applicant shall submit a final plat application within 12 months of this decision, or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: March 22, 2005 \d rb\su b\idx\prel im i nary. doc Plans received: February 18, 2005 IDX - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT APLICATION #SD-05-19 Agenda #7 Meeting Date. April 5, 2005 Owner/Applicant Property Information IDX Systems Corporation Tax Parcels 0915-00040-C and 0720-00035-C 40 IDX Drive Commercial 2 (C2) Zoning District; Traffic Overlay So. Burlington, VT 05403 District - Zone 3; Bartlett Brook Overlay District Location Map KIN, fit, y ... " � i :� ■■• CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx reliminary.doc Peter Smichenko, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting preliminary plat approval of a project to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 square -foot general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) adding three (3) floors to the east wing containing 87,234 square feet, 2) constructing a 4-story west wing containing 64,025 square feet, and 3) constructing a 565-space parking structure, 40 IDX Drive. Also, the amendment consists of constructing a 126 space parking area at 35 Green Mountain Drive for use by the offices at 40 IDX Drive. The applicant received final plat approval for the proposed project from the Planning Commission on February 9, 1999 (decision enclosed). However, the entire project was not constructed and therefore the approval lapsed for the unfinished portion of the project. This application is essentially for re -approval of the same project. The sketch plan was reviewed by the Development Review Board on October 19, 2004 (minutes enclosed). Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on February 18, 2005 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. 40 IDX Drive F C2 Zoning District Required F Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 713,985 SF Max. Building Coverage 40% 23% _ �1 Max. Overall Coverage 70% 65% ♦ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. ♦ Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. ♦ Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. 4 Max. Building Hei ht _ 40 ft. 77.5 ft. zoning compliance ♦ additional information needed A waiver required pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations Table 2. 35 Green Mountain Drive C2 Zoning District JERequired Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 71,098 SF �l Max. Building Coverage 40% 0% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 61 % �1 Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a � Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a 4 zoning compliance n/a not applicable because parking lots are not subject to setback requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\preliminarydoc PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations requires that the PUD meet the standards of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. 1. Stormwater drainage plans must demonstrate compliance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, pursuant to Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations. Both of the subject properties fall within the Bartlett Brook Watershed Overlay District. Thus, the proposed project shall be in compliance with Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations. 2. All applicable data required by Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations should be submitted with the final plat application. Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 3. The City of South Burlington Water Department shall review the plans prior to final plat approval. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 4. The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer, prior to submittal of the final plat application. 5. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation approval for the additional required capacity from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final plat plan approval. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 6. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to the property at 40 IDX Drive is currently provided via a 24' wide curb -cut and a 34' wide curb -cut off of IDX Drive, and a 28' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. Access to the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive is currently provided via an 18' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. No changes to access are proposed for either property. These are sufficient means of access for the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\preliminary doc Circulation on the properties appears to be adequate. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There do not appear to be any wetlands on either of the subject properties, but they do fall within the Bartlett Brook Overlay District. Staff has already stated that the applicant should submit the information required in Section 12.03 of the plans with the final plat application, so that impacts to Bartlett Brook can be analyzed. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the stated purpose of the C2 Zoning District. (f) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Open space on the property is sufficient. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 7. The South Burlington Fire Department shall review the plans, prior to final plat approval. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concerns regarding the above - mentioned criteria. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer reviewed the plans and did not raise any concerns regarding the above - mentioned criteria. (i) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels that the proposed project is in compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\preliminary doc SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site does provide for adequate planting and safe pedestrian movement. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed expansion requires a minimum 530 parking spaces. All of the buildings on the subject property, including the proposed and existing buildings, require a minimum of 1,346 parking spaces. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, Phase 1 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new second phase" in the application) will require 305 parking spaces, for a total of 1,050 parking spaces. A total of 305 parking spaces are proposed for Phase 1, for a total of 1,037 parking spaces. Phase 2 of the proposed expansion (identified as "new third phase" in the application) requires a minimum of 225 parking spaces. A parking structure containing 565 parking spaces is proposed for this phase. However, phase 2 construction will eliminate 164 existing parking spaces, so the net increase will be 376 parking spaces. In total, the applicant is proposing 1,273 parking spaces, which will require a 73 space, 5.4%, parking waiver. The Development Review Board has the authority to grant this waiver pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. The parking calculations for the proposed project include the 126-space parking area that will be constructed on the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive. The off -site parking area is within 800 linear feet of the property at 40 IDX Drive, so the Development Review Board has the authority to approve this parking layout, pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations. 8. Pursuant to Section 13.01(D) of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall record appropriate legal documents to ensure that the off -site parking spaces shall be available for the intended user, prior to recording of the final plat plans. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Most of the parking on the property at 40 IDX Drive is in existence. The proposed parking on this property is located to rear of the existing and proposed building, in relation to Shelburne Road. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The maximum height of proposed structure is 77.5' above average pre -construction grade. Thus the applicant is seeking a height waiver of 425, which the Development Review Board may grant pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\preliminary doc 9. The applicant should submit building elevation plans showing the height of all proposed structures in relation to the average pre -construction grade, prior to preliminary plat approval. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 10. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed building elevation plans should be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval (fl Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Proposed building elevation plans should be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the followin specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require the reservation of land to provide access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). 11. The plans shall be revised to clearly depict and label existing and proposed dumpsters, adequately screened, prior to submittal of the final plat application. Lighting 12. Lighting details (cut -sheets) in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations should be submitted with the final plat application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\preliminary.doc The applicant submitted lighting point -by -point plans for the properties at 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. The proposed lighting -levels are in compliance with Appendix A of the Land Development Regulations. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. The applicant submitted an adequate landscape plan and landscape budget, in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape budget separates the proposed plantings into three (3) phases (attached). The City Arborists reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memorandum dated March 24, 2005 (attached). 13. The landscaping plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Arborist, prior to submittal of the final plat application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans depict adequate snow storage areas for both properties. Traffic According to the ITE, 71h Edition (Land Use Code 710), the proposed expansion is estimated to generate and additional 225.38 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The existing buildings are estimated to generate 347.37 P.M. peak -hour vtes. Thus the property in its entirety is estimated to generate 572.75 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The property is located within the Traffic Overlay District — Zone 3, so it may generate a total of 803.23 peak -hour vtes. The applicant submitted a traffic study with the original application for the IDX expansion project. During the sketch plan review of the current application, the Development Review Board requested that the applicant's traffic engineer review the traffic study to ensure that its recommendations are still applicable to the project. The applicant's traffic engineer reviewed this study and provided comments in a memorandum dated October 18, 2004 (attached). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve preliminary plat application #SD- 05-19, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Peter Smichenko, applicant PLANT LIST 401DX "100 Bldg. Parking Expansion" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1128105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT" TOTAL Amelanchier Grandifloria Robin Hill Serviceberry 27 1 1/2"- 1 3/4"' $275.00 $7,425 Robin Hill' Gleditsia Triacanthos Imperial Honeylocust 13 2 1/2" - 3" $525.00 $6,825 Imperial" Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 4 6' - 7' $290.00 $1,160 SUB TOTAL $15,410 Concrete Wall 5,500 SQ.FT. $30.00 $165,000 (Retaining existing vegetation) TOTAL $180,410 " The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 2/18/2005 PLANT LIST 40 IDX "Parking Garage" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1128105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Forsythia ovata Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Malus 'Coralburst' Pinus nigra Quercus palustris Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' PRICE/PLANT' TOTAL Autumn Blaze Maple 5 31/2"-4" $937.50 $4,687.50 Early Forsythia 54 3 gal. $37.50 $2,025.00 Patmore Green Ash 1 41 /2"-5" $1,625.00 $1,625.00 Coralburst Crabapple 10 4'-5' $225.00 $2,250.00 Austrian Pine 12 8'-10, $487.50 $5,850.00 Pin Oak 13 41/2"-5" $1,650.00 $21,450.00 Greenspire Littleleaf 3 41/2"-5" $1,675.00 $5,025.00 Linden TOTAL $42,912.50 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 2/18/2005 PLANT LIST IDX 35 Green Mountain Drive Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 116105 4 AFNTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT* TOTAL Acer x freemanii Autumn Blaze Map Autumn Blaze' Gleditsia triacanthos Imperial Honeyloc Imperial' Malus 'Adams' Adams Crabapple Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 11 21/2"-3" $550.00 $6,050.00 6 21/2"-3" $512.50 $3,075.00 5 13/4"-2" $400.00 $2,000.00 6 7'-8' $345.00 $2,070.00 TOTAL $13,195.00 " The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. SH"URNE ROAD ROUTE 7 40 site 35 1 �1 Lj 25 Slte-� SITE MAP 1'-500' NOTES 1. OWNER. IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION AO IDX DRIVE SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 2. PARCEL 01.. 0915-0040 J. OVERALL LOT AREA 16.39 ACRES I. 20NWG. COMMERCIAL 2 5. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING - 11.55 FINAL BLDG. COVERAGE - 22.95 PERMITTED COVERAGE - 40X SITE COVERAGE (INC. BLDG.) EXISTING - 57.11I FINAL - 65X PERMITTED COVERAGE - 70% 6. SETBACKS SIDE 10 FEET REAR 30 FEET FRONT 30 FEET NON RESIDENTIAL 75 FEET GREEN BUFFER WITH NOT MORE THAN 3M COVERAGE IN FRONT YARD 30 FEET SETBACK. EXISTING FRONT YARD COVERAGE — 3.35I ROUTE 7 EXISTING FRONT YARD COVERAGE — 25.97R DX DRIVE PROPOSED FRONT YARD COVERAGE — 9.85% GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 7. PARKING CALCULATION PLEASE REFER TO DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY DX. B. THIS PLAN SHOWS EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASED ON ABOVE GROUND OBSERVATIONS AND RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT THE ACTUAL LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY UTILITY MAY VARY FROM THAT SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT 'GIG SAFE' TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UTILITIES AS SHOWN AND AS FOUND. 9. SHOW STORAGE ON —SITE AND TRUCKED OFF —SITE 1O UGH77NC SCHEDULE PI * Gmdro LIP-22-7-0-250WH BRP 250w Type V, Post —top mounted, .ml—epherlcal, segmented optic, ehmp cutoff Iumhalre. Dmk bronco Pawed /Mleh lomp proNded by M11 Gordco, 20'—C' height, 5' stroight elumMum round, Rusty .Dune eanmeit bate mounled M Islands. M po.d Parklnq then, use 3' round Pale with 24' rolmd concrete base mosed obace powhq ro. gVVdloq mounted central phetosensor 200w Put. semi balla-t oof- MeleN" by Gardro. P2 Gmdeo MP-22-7—J-250MN BRP 250w Type M. Post —top mounted. .ml—spherlcrol, segment" optk, MOM cutoff !—Oke. Dark bronrs paint" lamp proWded by Mh Gardro. 20'-0' height, 5' straight oW kl round, Rush round concrete base mounted. Bu9dlnq mount" central Photosenem 200w Pulse stem ballast option Nsfond by 00M11 P21HS H Gardro MP-22-1-3-23GMH—= BRP—HS 250w Type RI. Poet —tap mount", emhephellcal, segmentsd optic. ehorP cutoff luminoln with houseslds fhwd. Dark bronse point" lamp pm~ by Mir Gerdco. 20'-0' height, 5' straight aluminum round, Rush —d concrete bass mounted. BuNdinq mounted n hoi photoseneer 200w Pulse start bellaet option M.taNsd by Gard - Graphic Seale Feet so 0 so 100 ISO 200 EMSTWG CHAIN LINK FENCE TLE POINT 394 TC 219.47 NT I AF-I 2AF T N/F MEADOWOOD ENTERPRISES. LPA 7 i� 11 II I 1 1 1 1 VISTAOLF1 EREROSIONN CONTROL at ROL DURING CONSTRUCTION W ALL ON -SITE CATCH BASINS NEW AND EXISTING i 1 Ir 1 I � I 2f0.0f 1 F20R3* T N UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT B P■ ■t.S4_ , \ \ ICE 0. POINT 221.13 PZAIS .nq1� ------ 1 2 AF F r 307 I • , f • ff I w1�n��y,�.A II i AS ® 'i 1 a e r E O P1 J E M 01 �J - 1111 � I 9'ROP06ED PAVm PARR N I A3, J t 'Ns t , ® ?e FR• J a } 4 p n T POOP I I 200.20 1 - low 1 1 F-206.80 \ � � M•106.0 1 I ? Z .i E N/F NOTES Q& REAL ESTATE CORP. 1. OWNER: OX SYSTEu.5 CORPORATION P.O. Box I= SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05402 2. zoNWc co+wERau 2 / J. TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 1.63 ACRES / 71.006of I 1. DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR LOT COVERAGE oERM1/7ED EYIeTING PROPOSED lox 63.09 / 776of 61.JX / 43,575sf 5. FRONT YARD SETBACK COVERAGE: TOTAL FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA _ 6.754.8 at FRONT YARD SETBACK IMPERVIOUS AREA ALL0IVABLE: JOX - L206,H of FRONT YARD SMACK IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING' 3B.9X - 2628.59 of FRONT YARD SETBACK IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED: 10.7% - 722.75 of 6. THIS PLAN SHOWS EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASED ON ABOVE GROUND OBSERVATIONS AND RECORD DRANNOS TIE! CONTRACTOR SMALL ANTICIPATE THAT THE ACTUAL LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY UTILITY MAY VARY FROM THAT SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT 'DIG SAPr TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL NOIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF •,ua r ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN S AS SHOW! AND AS FOUND. i 7. PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 126 SPACES B LIGHTNC SCHEDULE: Pi 0 A Imo' 15' PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT Gwd- UP- 22-1-0-25OMM-_ BRP '250r TIP, V, Post -tap mounted, s.ml-sphwkdl. ..p -t.d aptk.Narp cutoff IumYlaX.. Dark Dnnn peMtW h,Mh' I"" P'OWC" byMtr 'Gwdco. 20'-,- Mlpht 5- .trolphl olv,,u m round. 6u.h round -t. Dos. -tod 0, MI-Wo, In Powd PaM 9 ends. u., 18'-0'. 5' round pPW rItH 24" round .--I. Dos. ••po.ed tpov. pPMnq.' Su9dV,q mounted dnlnl php(-m 200, PI,, xIPM Dalla.t eptbn mstdNd by Gardeo YN. Pz/HS Ai Gprdc, 1- N---BRP-Hs '250R iy1» m, top m .Hnl-.Ph.rkRl, t,b p ld, D , p, e•gmMbd OPtk, Tharp Cola( IumMPX..5t house' ahMld. Owk enn:. polnMd lamp fttt pb preNded by MN 'Gwdco. 20'-0, h,lghf 5' .Irolpnf dvminum round, Bu.n round cancnt. DaN mounted' 8.0-9 mounted control photo- 200- P- for bOb.t optbn O ln.tall.d Dy Co... PLANTING SCHEDKEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME OUAN77T'Y SIZE COMMENTS AF AM X FREZMAAN 'AUTUMN 8LA2i AUTIIMH BLAII FREEMAN MAPLE 10 2 112' - J'OBT e--L co"T■A TRMCANTNDS •A7tlpS TNORMESS NONEYLOCUST 6 2 1/2' - J' YA MALVS 'ADAYSApAMS CRABAPPLE S 1 1/1' - 1 1/2' B W B. WAVY /0 y PN PI4/S NG*A AUSM,AN PINE 6 6' - r B • B \ - \- T AF I _L 5 IAA I Al 1 I. 1 24' SNOW STAORAGE ♦ // I i GRAVEL - REA WD I ``.�^ _- ��- EXTEND SILT FENCE BEYDEWSMO SWALE IN LAW LA -�� T...,•J' iL�:j�-,' < ( \ 10' GM.P.0 FA..,----_-- .i "1 ^ 1 TELEPHONE ]y� PEDESTALS r. - ----- ----- ce_6:CIIE-------------------------'---- f•202.J8 CONCRETE I.IM.OB I h 1.1668• IY M 10 12 CONSTRUCTION 'MI980 • .n (2) -_--♦ \\ - VAULT ENhAN0. ,1.07. -------------- S _„ 168.78 wit .. �__ IFI97.0 twt i - 1 1 ........... if »__»_----»J •m_» ----------» -------- 1 i i 12' X 38' EASEMENT i _ _ • ' Zl 1 GREEN MOlMTAN DRIVE F•200.61 1./96.9I h IS' ad' / \ -»»»-----_- r,16.4_Lt2WL---------------1'----------------- • \ - ------ --------- 0•---- ----------- »' '_-"-'--'---------__ •-----'-_ CA i \ TB.78 I"r=Tw.76 � \ 1.19wse i \ i \ i I �- Grnphlc 5cn1e , i filet - _ .IW-�----• 20 O 20 40 60 ■o NUT rox SYSTEMS CORP. LEGEND T/46 76 PROPCum WATER MANS _ ____ ____ AND SERVICES GASMAN ---------------------- STORM DRAINAGE »» /- TOPOGRAPHIC _---_1:3-----. NX CONTOURS CIA LED DRIVE OR ROAD GRAVEL DRIVE OR ROAD CURB PROPERTY LINE NGHT-OF-WAY LINE EASEMENTS _..-_._..-.._._»..- FENCE ----- »-- STORM DRAINAGE (DIAN) ■ MANHOLE CATCH BASIN (CB) 13 ■ VAL YE MM FIRE HYDRANT (HID) UTC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL It LUMINAIRE Pi 0 woad( P9.,a. w. ti tttts DETAIL OF INLET SEDIMENT COMROL DEVICE TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478 W*h*Rod P.O. Bm, 308 MOZ1870M10unel VV■1Fan V..nw 05405 MOO 87%40E0�0. C YYRMmOw•Dc XrWW.IWX.Y.YB•�.®I �^TNt RAJW AM .IRA.LL lel M f4pU- bi ' CONCO'TOAL APIEOVAL BIiIAQ{ION M AAANAEV' ARROVAl stwAsmmc*t ACT 2110 "JABSION MIAL ARROVAL SUMAISAON f TTQi DRAW469 f. p�yy. Ps•w w rwinu � n...a.e M r.r.n>w�r�+•o �� 1Mr �.... r,-,r w � •wnn � .�wws�w. •..M. i 't. � M. Po•M Mµ� Abu, o� .�Mr wwi•/an M�- ..wMo h M eA1ro1�� 1l w. w. rs.�.e q•A"W,w. M � ^ � a� it W• to • to \ ey • VI-1-,A 1 r..•.44- Db. De U.- -- b ReYNlPrle OI�Iw,gF,�7y% 237 111411110 IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 35 Green Mountain Drive So. Burlington, Vermont Sheet T76• Site Plan D-4w 81,brr.bcr96051-ID7 f�latmedalI E PNJ-d --NsQ , DAn Dews, SMT Daft, 1-0! 2W! F.B. 20E SEAT•, T' - 20' Protect rWI-; xxx X-Rd, 9t1D5ldcm Daldt TGe , XXX SPI CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DLE PARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 1, 2005 Peter Smichenko, Director Corporate Services & Facilities IDX Systems Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: 40 IDX Drive & 35 Green Mountain Drive Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 5, 2oo5 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 2 of 10 space at 40 IDX Drive, new construction of a parking structure containing 565 parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive to replace surface parking at 35 GM Drive and 40 IDX Drive. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing original office building: Existing cafeteria/connector building: Existing east wing building: Proposed completion of east wing building: Proposed west wing building: Total: 124,208 sf. 20,476 sf. 88,449 sf. 87,234 sf. 64,025 sf. (excludes parking structure) 384,392 sf. Note: All floor areas are in gross square feet (to exterior wall surface) d) Height of building and number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Height Floors Existing original office building: 40 3 Existing connector/cafeteria building: 30 2 Existing east wing building: 40 3 (includes basement) Proposed completion of east wing building: 77.5* 6 (includes basement) Proposed west wing building: 47 4 Proposed parking structure: 33.5 3 *Assumes same roof system and rooftop hvac units as installed on existing east wing building e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Notgpplicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Employees Existing employees at 40 IDX Drive 650* Estimated capacity for existing buildings at 40 IDX Drive 825 Estimated capacity with completed east wing building 1350 Estimated capacity with west wing building 1775 *Includes part-time employees at a factor of .5 IDX currently operates two company vehicles and proposes to operate two company vehicles after the expansion g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 3 of 10 This application proposes the remainder of the planned expansion of the IDX campus at 40 IDX Drive The South Burlington Planning Commission previously granted planned unit development for the entire expansion (preliminary. plat ap rp oval granted December 8 1998 final plat approval granted January 26 1999) The previous approval contemplated phased construction. Phase I was to include the addition of a six floor east win containing approximately 175,588 square feet of office and storage space and a 20,476 square foot cafeteria/connector building, and the extension of IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive Phase II was to consist of a three - level parking structure containing 679 parking spaces and Phase III was to consist of the addition of a four floor west wing containing approximately 64,120 square feet of office space IDX has completed part of Phase I of the approved development, including the connector/cafeteria building and three of the six floors planned for the east wing building containing approximately 88,449 square feet of office and storage space, the Green Mountain Drive extension and surface parking lots stormwater collection and treatment systems landscaping and related site improvements. Construction has not proceeded as quicklyaoriginally planned and the Planning Commission approvals for the remainder of the development have now expired IDX now proposes to complete Phase I as previously_pproved by adding three floors to the east wing building, containing approximately 87,234 square feet of additional office space total east wing_gross floor area would be Qproximately 175,683 square feet). IDX would construct a total of approximately 305 net additional surface parking spaces on site at 40 IDX Drive and off site at 35 Green Mountain Drive A proportionate share of these additional surface parking spaces would be provided as IDX occupies each of the additional three floors of the east wing building. IDX also proposes to complete Phases II and III as previously Vproved, except that IDX now proposes to reduce the size of the parking structure, and to construct it later, simultaneously with the construction of the proposed west wing building. The proposed west wing would contain approximately 64,025 Uoss square feet of office space Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 3.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area In the prior approval, the Planning Commission excluded the connector/cafeteria building from parking calculation (see Finding of Fact No. 6 of the February 9, 1999 of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval) With this exclusion, the required and proposed parking would be as follows: Gross Floor Area Required Parking Proposed Parking Existing 212,657 sf. 74 -v 732 (existing) With completed east wing building 299,891 sf. 1,050 1,037* With west wing building 363,916 sf. 1,273 1,273 *Does not include ten parallel parking spaces shown along main entrance driveway at 40 IDX Drive site The Applicant is seeking the authorization to stripe these spaces only if necessary. This planned unit development is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. IDX constructed all of the proposed stormwater treatment systems required in this Overlay District as part of the first phase of the development. Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 4 of 10 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? Not applicable c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: Not applicable 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Size of Parcel: 40 IDX Drive: 713,984.5 square feet; 16,39 acres +/-* 35 GM Drive: 71,098 square feet; 1.63 acres +/- *This parcel size excludes the triangular area at the southeast corner of the intersection of IDX Drive and Route 7, conveyed to the State of Vermont for the Route 7 widening ,project by BDP Realty Associates bX deed recorded in Book 550 at Page 589. By greement with the City of South Burlington at the time of the conveyance IDX may include the triangular area in the parcel size for coverage calculations IDX has not included the triangular parcel in these coverage calculations because it is not necessary to satisfy coverage limits. b) Building Coverage: 40 IDX Drive: Existing 82,064 square feet 11.49% Proposed 163,607 square feet 22.92% (includes parking structure) 35 GM Drive: Existing 14,389 square feet 20.24% Proposed 0 square feet 0% c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): 40 IDX Drive: Existing 412,908 square feet 57.83% Proposed 464,337 square feet 65.04% 35 GM Drive: Existing 44,776 square feet 63.0% Proposed 43,575 square feet 61.3% Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 5of10 d) Front Yard Coverages(s) (commercial projects only) 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 27,168 square feet (along Shelburne Road) Existing 910 square feet 3.35% Proposed 910 square feet 3.35% 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 23,111 square feet (along IDX Drive) Existing 6002 square feet 25.97% Proposed 6002 square feet 25.97% 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 23,501 square feet (along GM Drive) Existing 0 square feet 0% Proposed 2315 square feet 9.85% 35 GM Drive: Setback Area 6,755 square feet Existing 2,629 square feet 38.9% Proposed 723 square feet 10.7% 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that applicant is seeking The Applicant is requesting waivers of the building height and parking requirements of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, as described below: Building Height Waiver: Section 3.07(D) of the Regulations imposes a 35 foot height limit above average nre- construction grade for a structure with a flat roof. The posed east wing building would have a height of approximately 77.5 feet above average pre -construction grade and the proposed west wing building would have a height of approximately 47 feet above average pre -construction grade Applicant seeks a height waiver under Section 3.07(F)(2) of the Regulations. The Planning Commission granted a height waiver for these same buildings under Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations in effect in 1999 (see Finding of Fact No. 10 of the February 9 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat ap rp oval)determining that the height of the buildings would not detract from important public scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights of way. The height measurement is different because the pre -construction grade has changed and the prior height estimate did not include hvac units, but the Planning Commission analyzed the same visual impact in granting the prior approval Parking Waiver: As noted above, Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 1,050 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I (the expanded east wing building)• the Applicant proposes 1,037 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I (note: this proposed parking figure excludes the ten parallel parking spaces shown along the main entrance driveway on the 40 IDX Drive site). In the prior approval, the Planning Commission granted a 2 1 % waiver of the parking space requirement (see Finding of Fact No. 6 of the February 9 1999 of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval). The Applicant now seeks a waiver of 1.2% of the required number of parking spaces upon completion of Phase I. The Applicant would provide part of the parking required for the expanded east wing building in a remote surface Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 6 of 10 parking lot at located at 35 Green Mountain Drive as permitted under Section 13 01(D) of the Regulations While the nearest point of the 35 Green Mountain Drive parcel is located within 800 feet of the 40 IDX Drive parcel some of the parking spaces in this remote lot would be located slightly more than 800 feet from the 40 IDX Drive parcel Applicant seeks a waiver of the 800 foot remote parkin lot of adjacency requirement under Section 13 01(N)(2) of the Regulations. Note: In its prior approval, the Planning Commission granted a waiver of a 40 foot front setback requirement for the parking structure under the zoning regulations then in effect which is located 32 feet from the right of way boundar for Green Mountain Drive and a waiver of the setback coverage limit along IDX Drive (see Findings of Fact No 4 and 5 of the February 9, 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval) Since the prior approval the Green Mountain Drive setback has been reduced to 30 feet under Table C-2 of the current Regulations and the extension of the right of way for IDX Drive has created more green setback area so neither of these waivers is now required. 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) Completion of east wing base building Completion of east wing building fit -up Expansion of existing 40 IDX Drive parking lot Surface parking on parking structure site West wing base building West wing fit -up Parking structure $5,370,000 $3,045,000 $400,000 (excludes planting) $328,000 $5_,120,000 $2,240,000 $6,100,000 (excludes planting) b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) 40 IDX Drive — Phase I $180,410* (to be installed with parking lot expansion) 40 IDX Drive — Phase II $42,913* (to be installed with parking structure) 40 IDX Drive — Phase III $0 (already installed) 35 GM Drive $12,645* *See attached Plant Lists prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Demolition 35 GM Drive Parking lot 35 GM Drive 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) With proposed completion of east wing building: $62,000 $423,000 (excludes landscaping) Weekday Weekend 2,442 289 3,996 473 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 7of10 With proposed west wing building: 5,254 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 429 With proposed completion of east wing building: 702 With proposed west wing building: 923 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 347 With proposed completion of east wing building: 567 With proposed west wing building: 746 621 The estimated average daily traffic is based on 1998 traffic counts indicating a weekdav average of 2.96 vehicle trips per employee and a weekend average of 35 trips per employee The estimate peak hour trips are based on A M peak hour trip generation rate of 52 trips per employee and P.M. peak hour trip generation rate of 42 trips per employee, determined by Resource Systems Group in its 1999 traffic study. See attached letter from Resource Systems Group confirming that its 1999 study assumptions are still valid. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday through Friday. 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE IDX anticipates that it will start construction of the remainder of the east wing building and the surface parking lots in June 2005 and will occupy the first of the three new floors by June of 2006. IDX estimates that it will start construction of the west wing building and the parking structure in the Spring of 2008. 16) PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS (include those across a street). You may attach on a separate sheet: Property Address Property Owner Name and Mailing Address per 2004 Grand List) 40 IDX Drive Abutting Properties (includes properties directly across public roadsh 1333 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee, 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 1335 Shelburne Road same as above 1341 Shelburne Road same as above See Way Care Wash, Inc., 368 Olde Orchard Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 1360 Shelburne Road BDP Realty Associates, 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 1459 Shelburne Road Anthony Socinski, 1459 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1475 Shelburne Road Two O'Briens Properties, LLC, 1475 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1485 Shelburne Road DBS Limited Partnership, c/o Goss Dodge, Inc., 1485 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05043 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 8 of 10 1580 Shelburne Road Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 75 Green Mountain Drive Pammella and George Starbuck Family Trust, 147 West Shore Road, Grand Isle, VT 05458 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 40 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 41 IDX Drive Plaza Investments, 28 Day Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Mervin Brown 35 Green Mountain Drive Abutting Properties (includes properties directiv across public roads): 30 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 45 Green Mountain Drive Meadowood Enterprises, 212 Meadow Wood Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 17) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: ID. am SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER: IDX Systems Corporation By It Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 9 of 10 Do not write below this line 1 ✓ DATE OF SUBMISSION: I I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ✓Comple ❑ Incomplete �L /�X/ of Planning & Zoning or Designee Efate Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 1 of 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington Vermont 05403 Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax (802) 862-8098. 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Deeds to IDX Systems Corporation recorded in Book 501 at Page 513, Book 501 at Page 518, Book 447 at Page 133. 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, P.O. Box 1070, Burlington, VT 05402-1070, Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax (802) 862-8098 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Peter Smichenko, Director, Corporate Services & Facilities, IDX Systems Corporation 40 IDX Drive P O Box 1070 Burlington VT 05402-1070 Phone (802) 859- 4135, Fax (802) 862-8098. 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 40 IDX Drive; 35 Green Mountain Drive. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0915-00040; 0720-00035. 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 40 IDX Drive: 1.24,208 square foot office building, 88,449 square foot partially completed east wing building containingstorage torage and office space 20,476 square foot connector/cafeteria building 732 striped surface parking spaces and related site improvements. 35 GM Drive: 14,389 square foot office/production building, parking lot and related site improvements. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Existing: Existing uses at 40 IDX Drive to remain except for approximately 189 parking spaces that will be supplanted by the west wing building and the parking structure. New second phase: New construction completing the east wing building by adding three floors containing 87,234 square feet of office space and construction of 179 net new parking surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive; demolition of existing improvements and construction of a new parking lot containing 126 parking spaces at 35 GM Drive. New third phase: New construction of a four-story west wing building containing 64,025 square feet of office Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 2 of 10 space at 40 IDX Drive; new construction of a parking structure containing 565_parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive to replace surface parking at 35 GM Drive and 40 IDX Drive c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing original office building: Existing cafeteria/connector building: Existing east wing building: Proposed completion of east wing building: Proposed west wing building: Total: 124,208 sf. 20,476 sf. 88,449 sf. 87,234 sf. 64,025 sf. (excludes parking structure) 384,392 sf. Note: All floor areas are in gross square feet (to exterior wall surface) d) Height of building and number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Height Floors Existing original office building: 40 3 Existing connector/cafeteria building: 30 2 Existing east wing building: 40 3 (includes basement) Proposed completion of east wing building: 77.5* 6 (includes basement) Proposed west wing building: 47 4 Proposed parking structure: 33.5 3 *Assumes same roof system and rooftop hvac units as installed on existing east wing building e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) Employees Existing employees at 40 IDX Drive 650* Estimated capacity for existing buildings at 40 IDX Drive 825 Estimated capacity with completed east wing building 1350 Estimated capacity with west wing building 1775 *Includes part-time employees at a factor of .5 IDX currently perates two company vehicles and proposes to operate two company vehicles after the expansion g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) . Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 3 of 10 This application proposes the remainder of the planned expansion of the IDX campus at 40 IDX Drive The South Burlington Planning Commission previously granted planned unit development for the entire expansion (preliminary plat approval granted December 8 1998 final plat approval granted January 26 1999) The previous approval contemplated phased construction. Phase I was to include the addition of a six floor east wing containing approximately 175,588 square feet of office and storage space and a 20,476 square foot cafeteria/connector building, and the extension of IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive Phase II was to consist of a three - level parking structure containing 679 parking spaces, and Phase III was to consist of the addition of a four floor west wing containing approximately 64,120 square feet of office space. IDX has completed part of Phase I of the approved development including the connector/cafeteria building and three of the six floors planned for the east wing building containing_ approximately 88,449 square feet of office and storage space, the Green Mountain Drive extension and surface parking lots stormwater collection and treatment systems, landscaping and related site improvements Construction has not proceeded as quicklyaoriginally planned and the Planning Commission approvals for the remainder of the development have now expired IDX now proposes to complete Phase I as previously approved by adding three floors to the east wing building, containing approximately 87,234 square feet of additional office space (total east wing gross floor area would be approximately 175,683 square feet). IDX would construct a total of approximately 305 net additional surface parking spaces on site at 40 IDX Drive and off site at 35 Green Mountain Drive A proportionate share of these additional surface parking spaces would be provided as IDX occupies each of the additional three floors of the east wing building. IDX also poses to complete Phases II and III as previously approved except that IDX now poses to reduce the size of the parking structure, and to construct it later, simultaneously with the construction of the proposed west wing building. The posed west wing would contain approximately 64,025 gross square feet of office space Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 3.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area In the prior approval, the Planning Commission excluded the connector/cafeteria building from parking calculation (see Finding of Fact No. 6 of the February 9, 1999 of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval) With this exclusion, the required and proposed parking would be as follows: Gross Floor Area Required Parking Proposed Parking Existing 212,657 sf. 744 732 (existing) With completed east wing building 299,891 sf. 1,050 1,037* With west wing building 363,916 sf. 1,273 1,273 *Does not include ten parallel parking spaces shown along main entrance driveway at 40 IDX Drive site The Applicant is seeking the authorization to stripe these spaces only if necessark This planned unit development is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. IDX constructed all of the proposed stormwater treatment systems required in this Overlay District as part of the first phase of the development. Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 4 of 10 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II or III) on the subject property? No b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers`? Not gpl2licable c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: Not applicable 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Size of Parcel: 40 IDX Drive: 713,984.5 square feet, 16.39 acres +/-* 35 GM Drive: 71,098 square feet, 1.63 acres +/- *This parcel size excludes the triangular area at the southeast corner of the interscction of IDX Drive and Route 7, conveyed to the State of Vermont for the Route 7 widening project by BDP Realty Associates by deed recorded in Book 550 at Page 589. By agreement with the City of South Burlington at the time of the conveyance, IDX may include the triangular area in the parcel size for coverage calculations IDX has not included the triangular parcel in these coverage calculations because it is not necessary to satisfy coverage limits. b) Building Coverage: 40 IDX Drive: Existing 82,064 square feet 11.49% Proposed 163,607 square feet 22.92% (includes parking structure) 35 GM Drive: Existing 14,389 square feet 20.24% Proposed 0 square feet 0% c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): 40 IDX Drive: Existing 412,908 square feet 57.83% Proposed 464,337 square feet 65.04% 35 GM Drive: Existing 44,776 square feet 63.0% Proposed 43,575 square feet 61.3% Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 5 of 10 d) Front Yard Coverages(s) (commercial projects only) 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 27,168 square feet (along Shelburne Road) Existing 910 square feet 3.35% Proposed 910 square feet 3.35% 40 IDX Drive: Setback Area 23,111 square feet (along IDX Drive) Existing 6002 square feet 25.97% Proposed 6002 square feet 25.97% 40 1DX Drive: Setback Area 23,501 square feet (along GM Drive) Existing 0 square feet 0% Proposed 2315 square feet 9.85% 35 GM Drive: Setback Area 6,755 square feet Existing 2,629 square feet 38.9% Proposed 723 square feet 10.7% 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that applicant is seeking The Applicant is requesting waivers of the building height and parking requirements of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, as described below: Building Height Waiver: Section 3.07(D) of the Regulations imposes a 35 foot height limit above average pre - construction grade for a structure with a flat roof. The proposed east wing building would have a height of approximately 77.5 feet above average re -construction grade and the posed west wing building would have a height of approximately 47 feet above average pre -construction grade Applicant seeks a height waiver under Section 3.07(F)(2) of the Regulations. The Planning Commission granted a height waiver for these same buildings und Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations in effect in 1999 (see Finding of Fact No 10 of the February 9 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval) determining that the height of the buildings would not detract from important public scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights of way. The height measurement is different because the pre -construction grade has changed and the prior height estimate did not include hvac units, but the Planning Commission analyzed the same visual impact in Uanting the prior approval Parking Waiver: As noted above, Section 13.01 of the Regulations requires 1,050 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I (the expanded east wing building),• the Applicant proposes 1,037 parking spaces upon completion of Phase I (note: this proposed parking figure excludes the ten parallel parking spaces shown along the main entrance driveway on the 40 IDX Drive site). In the prior approval the Planning Commission granted a 2.1 % waiver of the parking space requirement (see Finding of Fact No. 6 of the February 9 1999 of the Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval). The Applicant now seeks a waiver of 1.2% of the required number of parking spaces upon completion of Phase I. The Applicant would provide part of the parking required for the expanded east wing building in a remote surface Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 6 of 10 parking lot at located at 35 Green Mountain Drive as permitted under Section 13 01(D) of the Regulations While the nearest point of the 35 Green Mountain Drive parcel is located within 800 feet of the 40 IDX Drive parcel some of the parking spaces in this remote lot would be located slightly more than 800 feet from the 40 IDX Drive parcel Applicant seeks a waiver of the 800 foot remote parkin lot of adjacency requirement under Section 13 01(N)(2) of the Regulations. Note: In its prior approval, the Planning Commission granted a waiver of a 40 foot front setback requirement for the parking structure under the zoning regulations then in effect which is located 32 feet from the right of way boundary for Green Mountain Drive and a waiver of the setback coverage limit along IDX Drive (see Findings of Fact No 4 and 5 of the February 9, 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision for the final plat approval) Since the prior approval the Green Mountain Drive setback has been reduced to 30 feet under Table C-2 of the current Regulations and the extension of the right of way for IDX Drive has created more green setback area so neither of these waivers is now required. 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) Completion of east wing base building Completion of east wing building fit -up Expansion of existing 40 IDX Drive parking lot Surface parking on parking structure site West wing base building West wing fit -up Parking structure $5,370,000 $3,045,000 $400,000 (excludes planting) $328,000 $5,120,000 $2,240,000 $6,100,000 (excludes planting) b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) 40 IDX Drive — Phase I $180,410* (to be installed with parking lot expansion) 40 IDX Drive — Phase II $42,913* (to be installed with parking structure) 40 IDX Drive — Phase III $0 (already installed) 35 GM Drive $12,645* *See attached Plant Lists prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) Demolition 35 GM Drive Parking lot 35 GM Drive 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) With proposed completion of east wing building: $62,000 $423,000 (excludes landscaping) Weekday Weekend 2,442 289 3,996 473 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 With proposed west wing building: 5,254 621 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 429 With proposed completion of east wing building: 702 With proposed west wing building: 923 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) Existing buildings (at full capacity) 347 With proposed completion of east wing building: 567 With proposed west wing building: 746 Page 7of10 The estimated average daily traffic is based on 1998 traffic counts indicating a weekday average of 2.96 vehicle trips per employee and a weekend average of 35 trips per employee The estimate peak hour trips are based on A.M peak hour trip generation rate of 52 trips per employee and P.M. peak hour trip generation rate of 42 trips per employee, determined by Resource Systems Group in its 1999 traffic study. See attached letter from Resource Systems Group confirming that its 1999 study assumptions are still valid 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Monday through Friday. 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE IDX anticipates that it will start construction of the remainder of the east wing building and the surface parking lots in June 2005 and will occupy the first of the three new floors by June of 2006. IDX estimates that it will start construction of the west wing building and the parking structure in the Spring of 2008. 16) PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS (include those across a street). You may attach on a separate sheet: Property Address Property Owner Name and Mailing Address (per 2004 Grand List) 40 IDX Drive Abutting Properties includes properties directly across public roads 1333 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee, 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 1335 Shelburne Road same as above 1341 Shelburne Road same as above See Way Care Wash, Inc., 368 Olde Orchard Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 1360 Shelburne Road BDP Realty Associates, 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 1459 Shelburne Road Anthony Socinski, 1459 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1475 Shelburne Road Two O'Briens Properties, LLC, 1475 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1485 Shelburne Road DBS Limited Partnership, c/o Goss Dodge, Inc., 1485 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05043 Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 8 of 10 1580 Shelburne Road Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 75 Green Mountain Drive Pammella and George Starbuck Family Trust, 147 West Shore Road, Grand Isle, VT 05458 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 40 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 41 IDX Drive Plaza Investments, 28 Day Lane, Williston, VT 05495 Attn: Mervin Brown 35 Green Mountain Drive Abutting Properties (includes properties directly across public roadsh 30 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 45 Green Mountain Drive Meadowood Enterprises, 212 Meadow Wood Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 65 Green Mountain Drive University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Office of University Relations & Operations, 109 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405, Attn: Linda Seavey 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 17) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: IDX Syst Corporation By s rook, r is SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER: IDX Systems Corporation By Mtses Permit Application No. SD-04-73 Page 9 of 10 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date INC. _.. — —11-- _�_ d .� , � 1--1 �_ . _ma. _. kl?i OUIttir. s%�.1I:;N1s r€atUP, iNC. 18 October, 2004 Mr. Peter Smichenko IDX, Corp. 25 Green Mountain Dr South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr Smichenko, At your request, we have reviewed our 30 June, 1999 traffic impact study to determine whether its findings are still valid, despite the delay in construction of Phase II of IDX's expansion project. To assess whether the conclusions in our study are still valid we have evaluated several important assumptions and whether the basis for those assumptions have significantly changed. These are summarized in the following table: ASSUMPTION CHANGE SINCE 1999 Expected employment No significant changes to the projections have been made Access and Egress Points There have been no changes to the proposed plan. The Shelburne Road Improvements are currently under construction. Traffic Volumes on US 7 The 1999 traffic study assumed a 1.3% per year growth rate. The latest information from VTrans at Automatic Traffic Recorder Station D431, just south of Green Mountain Drive, shows that the average daily traffic declined from 24,900 in 1998 to 22,700 in 2002. The VTrans counts in 2002 were made prior to the start of construction of the US 7 improvements. Safety The 0.3 mile section north of Green Mountain Drive was a High Accident Location in 1998, with an actual to critical ratio of 1.131. The latest VTrans crash data from 1998 to 2002 shows an actual to critical ratio of 1.052. This represents a 7% decline. The Shelburne Road improvements currently under construction are expected to significantly lower the crash rate in this segment. Mitigation Measures The 1999 traffic study recommended optimizing signal timings when IDX reaches full capacity. No changes are made to that recommendation. 331 01cott Drive, White diver Junction, Vermont 05001 r c x 802.295,4999 • A n 802,295, 1006 * vvvvvv.rs9inc.coin Mr. Peter Smichenko 18 October, 2004 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 I conclude that there have been no changes to the assumptions used in our 1999 traffic study that would a affect our mitigation recommendations or our conclusion that the project will no cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding streets and highways. Sincerely, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Kenneth Kaliski, P.E. Director of Environmental Services PLANT LIST 40 IDX "100 Bldg. Parking Expansion" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1128105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT'` TOTAL Amelanchier Grandifloria Robin Hill Serviceberry 27 1 1/2"- 1 3/4"' $275.00 $7,425 Robin Hill' Gleditsia Triacanthos Imperial Honeylocust 13 2 1/2" - 3" $525.00 $6,825 Imperial" Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 4 6' - 7' $290.00 $1,160 SUB TOTAL $15,410 Concrete Wall 5,500 SQ.FT. $30.00 $165,000 (Retaining existing vegetation) TOTAL $180,410 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 2/18/2005 PLANT LIST 40 /DX "Parking Garage" Route 7, Shelburne, VT Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 1128105 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT'' TOTAL Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze' Forsythia ovata Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' Malus 'Coralburst' Pinus nigra Quercus palustris Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' Autumn Blaze Maple 5 31/2"-4" Early Forsythia 54 3 gal. Patmore Green Ash 1 41/2"-5" Coralburst Crabapple 10 4'-5' Austrian Pine 12 8'-10' Pin Oak 13 41/2"-5" Greenspire Littleleaf 3 41/2"-5" Linden $937.50 $4,687.50 $37.50 $2,025.00 $1,625.00 $1,625.00 $225.00 $2,250.00 $487.50 $5,850.00 $1,650.00 $21,450.00 $1,675.00 $5,025.00 TOTAL $42,912.50 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. Trudell Consulting Engineers 2/18/2005 PLANT LIST IDX 35 Green Mountain Drive Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Karen Pettersen, Landscape Architect 116105 4C`IFNTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT* TOTAL Acer x freemanii Autumn Blaze Map Autumn Blaze' Gleditsia triacanthos Imperial Honeyloc Imperial' Malus 'Adams' Adams Crabapple Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 11 21/2"-3" $550.00 $6,050.00 6 21/2"-3" $512.50 $3,075.00 5 13/4"-2" $400.00 $2,000.00 6 7'-8' $345.00 $2,070.00 TOTAL $13,195.00 * The price per plant includes the cost of the plant, the installation, and a 1 year quarantee. DKM DOWNS NACHLIN MAtiIIN PLLC WILLIAM W. SCHROEDER bschroeder@drm.com Fax: (802) 862-7512 February 18, 2005 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Preliminary Plat Application No. SD-04-73 Dear Ray: We are delivering to you with this letter the following preliminary plat application materials, to reinstitute the planned unit development approval previously granted for the expansion of the IDX campus: 1. Two signed originals of the Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plat Review, with the following attachments: (i) October 18, 2004 letter from Resource Systems Group regarding the traffic impact study; and (ii) Plant Lists prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers. 2. Five full-size copies of the plan sets for 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. 3. One reduced (11" by 17") copy of each plan set. 4. Our firm check in the amount of $510.00 for the application fee. COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT ■ ST. JOHNSBURY, VT 0 BRATTLEBORO, VT ■ MONTPELIER, VT 0 LITTLETON, NH 2 WWW.DRM.COM Mr. Raymond J. Belair February 18, 2005 Page 2 The South Burlington Development Review Board conducted a sketch plan review of this proposed project at its meeting on October 19, 2004. The official contact person for this application is Peter Smichenko, the Director of Corporate Services and Facilities for IDX Systems Corporation. However, please contact me if you need any additional materials to complete this application. Thanks very much. Very truly yours, 2. William W. Schroeder Encs. as DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC 1P DKM DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC LORI A. BASS Lbass@drm.com DIRECT: (802) 846-8393 March 18, 2005 Via Hand Delivery Mr. Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation — Preliminary Plat Application No. SD-04-73 Dear Mr. Belair: We are delivering to you with this letter the following preliminary plat application materials to replace the copies which were inadvertently discarded: 1. Two sets of 24"x36" plans for 40 IDX Drive and 35 Green Mountain Drive. 2. One set of 11 "x17" copies of each plan set. The official contact person for this application is Peter Smichenko, the Director of Corporate Services and Facilities for IDX Systems Corporation. However, please contact Bill Schroeder if you need any additional materials to complete this application. Thanks very much. Sincerely, /LioibA. Bass Legal Secretary Enclosures BTV.429759.2 COURTHOUSE PLAZA ■ 199 MAIN STREET ■ PO BOX 190 ■ BURLINGTON, VT ■ 05402-0190 ■ T: +1.802.863.2375 ■ F: +1.802.862.7512 BURLINGTON, VT ■ ST. JOHNSBURY, VT ■ BRATTLEBORO, VT 0 MONTPELIER, VT ■ LITTLETON, NH 2 WWW.DRM.COM l Mr. Raymond J. Belair March 18, 2005 Page 2 cc: Mr. Peter Smichenko Mr. David Main Ms. Debra Bell DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING des ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Allson Partnership Ross Anderson PO BOX 11oo Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy Y c onough Administrative Assistant Encl. l CITY OF SOUTH B R LINGON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VER.MM01NT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 NPIRE 85 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, r Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Pammella & George Starbuck Family Trust 147 West Shore Road Grand Isle, VT 05458 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy onough Administrative Assistant Encl. E DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 University of Vermont Office of University Relations & Operations log South Prospect Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy onough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Plaza Investments Attn: Mery Brown 28 Day Lane Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Bets c y ono ugh Administrative Assistant Encl. I('ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLAINWING & ZONEgG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Meadowood Enterprises 212 Meadow'wood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, t4� Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNE'4G & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Sea Way Car Wash, Inc. 368 Olde Orchard Lane Shelburne, VT 05482 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 E. David Crane PO Box 34853 Burlington, VT 054o6 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy cDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 4& ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Anthony Socinski 1459 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, ,r-* Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN, GTONT DEPARTMENT OF PLAT NU\\\TG & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOINfi 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 Two O'Briens Properties, LLC 1475 Shelburne Load South ]Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, � g Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CI'P'f OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEDA]RTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 2005 DBS Limited Partnership c/o Goss Dodge, Inc. 1485 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-41o6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, (-?41oj OqajA"' tm Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conervation March 14, 2005 Tamara L. DiVasto Downs, Rachlin, Martin, PLLC P.O. Box 190 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0190 Dear Tamara: _l AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone (802) 879-5656 Subject: Permits #WW-4-0442 & #WW-4-0442-1; IDX Corporate Building located off Route 7 in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. I met today with Ms. Debra Bell, of Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., to discuss the proposed construction at the above referenced project. Ms. Bell confirmed that the building construction referenced in your letter to me dated January 10, 2005 conforms to the buildings shown on the plans approved by Permits #WW-4-0442 and #WW-4-0442-1. I understand that only a portion of the approved building known as 200 IDX was constructed and the revised Phase 1, to complete the upper three floors, and, Phase II, to complete the west wing, will result in the building footprint to conform to the building shown on the stamped plans #WW-4-0442-1. Based on the above understanding, the construction you outline in your letter dated January 10, 2005 is in compliance with Permits #WW-4-0442 and #WW-4-0442-1 and no permit amendments are required by the Wastewater Management Division. Please note, this letter does not relieve the landowner of complying with all rules and regulations administered by the City of South Burlington and the Act 250 Environmental Commission #4. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, 'z` Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer C City of South Burlington Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Act 250 Environmental Commission #4 — Case #4C0391 TDD: 1-800-253-0191 Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury "100% Processed Chlorine Free" CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: October 14, 2004 \drb\sub\idx\sketch.doc Plans received: September 24, 2004 IDX - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SKETCH PLAN APLICATION #SD-04-73 Agenda #14 Meeting Date: October 19, 2004 Owner/Applicant Property Information IDX Systems Corporation Tax Parcels 0915-00040-C and 0720-00035-C 40 IDX Drive Commercial 2 (C2)) Zoning District; Bartlett Brook So. Burlington, VT 05403 Overlay District Location Map z44 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\sketch. doc Peter Smichenko, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a project to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) adding three (3) floors to the east wing containing 87,234 sq ft, 2) constructing a 4-story west wing containing 64,025 sq ft, and 3) constructing a 542 space parking structure, 40 IDX Drive. Also, the amendment consists of constructing a 155 space parking area at 35 Green Mountain Drive for use by the offices at 40 IDX Drive. The applicant received final plat approval Commission on February 9, 1999 (decision constructed and therefore the approval lapsed. the same project. for the proposed project from the Planning enclosed). However, the project was not This application is essentially for re -approval of Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 24, 2004 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. 40 IDX Drive C2 Zoning District Required Proposed ♦ Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF ? Max. Building Coverage 40% 24% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 70% ♦ Min. Front Setback _ 30 ft. ? ♦ Min. Side Setback 10 ft. ? ♦ Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. ? 4 Max. Building Height 40 ft. 66 ft. �l zoning compliance ♦ additional information needed 4 waiver required pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations Table 2. 35 Green Mountain Drive C2 Zoning District Required Proposed ♦ Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF ? Max. Building Coverage 40% 0% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 62% Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a zoning compliance n/a not applicable because parking lots are not subject to setback requirements CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\ dx\sketch doc PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations requires that the PUD meet the standards of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. 1. Stormwater drainage plans must demonstrate compliance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, pursuant to Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations. Both of the subject properties fall within the Bartlett Brook Watershed Overlay District. Thus, the proposed project shall be in compliance with Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations. 2. All applicable data required by Section 12.03 of the Land Development Regulations should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. 3. The City of South Burlington Water Department should review the plans prior to preliminary approval. 4. The City Engineer should review the plans prior to preliminary approval. 5. The applicant should submit updated information on the number of existing employees so that the committed sewer allocation can be calculated. 6. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation approval for the additional required capacity from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to final plat plan approval. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 7. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 8. Grading and erosion control plans should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to the property at 40 IDX Drive is currently provided via a 24' wide curb -cut and a 34' wide curb -cut off of IDX Drive, and a 28' wide curb -cut off of Green Mountain Drive. Access to the property at 35 Green Mountain Drive is currently provided via an 18' wide curb -cut off of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\sketch doc Green Mountain Drive. No changes to access are proposed for either property. These are sufficient means of access for the project. Circulation on the properties appears to be adequate. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There do not appear to be any wetlands on either of the subject properties, but they do fall within the Bartlett Brook Overlay District. Staff has already stated that the applicant should submit the information required in Section 12.03 of the plans with the preliminary plat application, so that impacts to Bartlett Brook can be analyzed. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the stated purpose of the C2 Zoning District. (fJ Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Open space on the property is sufficient. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. 9. The South Burlington Fire Department should review the plans, prior to preliminary approval. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The City Engineer and Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department will review the plans to determine the project's compliance with this requirement. (i) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The City Engineer and Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department will review the plans to determine the project's compliance with this requirement. Q) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels that the proposed project is in compliance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\sketch doc SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The site does provide for adequate planting and safe pedestrian movement. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed expansion requires a minimum 529 parking spaces. All of the buildings on the subject property, including the proposed and existing buildings, require a minimum of 1,345 parking spaces. According to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, Phase 1 of the proposed expansion will require 305 parking spaces. A total of 318 parking spaces are proposed for this phase. Phase 2 of the proposed expansion requires a minimum of 224 parking spaces. A parking structure containing 542 parking spaces is proposed for this phase. However, phase 2 construction will eliminate 164 existing parking spaces, so the net increase will be 378 parking spaces. 10. The applicant should submit a complete parking calculation for the entire project, including both existing and proposed parking spaces on both of the subject properties, with the preliminary plat application. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Most of the parking on the property at 40 IDX Drive is in existence. The proposed parking on this property is located to rear of the existing and proposed building, from Shelburne Road. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The maximum height of proposed structure is 66' above average pre -construction grade. Thus the applicant is seeking a height waiver of 31', which the Development Review Board may grant pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Land Development Regulations. 11. The applicant should submit building elevation plans showing the height of all proposed structures in relation to the average pre -construction grade, with the preliminary plat application. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\sketch. doc (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed building elevation plans should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. (t) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Proposed building elevation plans should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street; to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require the reservation of land to provide access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). 13. The plans should be revised to depict existing and proposed dumpsters, adequately screened, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. Lighting 14. Lighting details (cut -sheets) in compliance with Appendix D of the Land Development Regulations should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 15. The applicant should submit a lighting point -by -point plan in compliance with Appendix A with the preliminary plat application. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\idx\sketch doc 16. A landscape plan and landscape budget in compliance with Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations should be submitted with the preliminary plat application. Any landscaping that has been planted as a result of the original approval should be included and clearly labeled in the landscape budget. 17. The City Arborist should review the landscape plans prior to final approval. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. 18. The plans should be revised to depict proposed snow storage areas for the subject property, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat application. Traffic According to the ITE, 71h Edition (Land Use Code 710), the proposed expansion is estimated to generate and additional 225.38 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The existing buildings are estimated to generate 347.37 P.M. peak -hour vtes. Thus the property in its entirety is estimated to generate 572.75 P.M. peak -hour vtes. The property is located within the Traffic Overlay District — Zone 3, so it may generate 45 P.M. peak -hour vtes per 40,000 square feet of land area. 19. The applicant submitted traffic impact studies for the project dated November 19, 1998 and January 21, 1999. These studies were submitted for the original approval. The applicant should make any necessary modifications to the original traffic impact study and submit the revised study with the preliminary plat application. Other 20. The applicant should submit a report, with the preliminary plat application, addressing the planned unit development criteria in Section 15.18 of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document prior to submitting the preliminary plat application. Respectfu submitted, Brun Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Peter Smichenko, applicant FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consis of a 384,400 square foot general office use facility and a 679 space parking structure, 1400 Shelbu. Road. On the 26' day of January, 1999, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of BDI Realty Associates for final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of. 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot. The 124,208 square feet building was approved on 12/15/87. Several minor site modifications have been made since 1987. This application will be treated as a planned unit development. The preliminary plat was approved on 12/8/98. 2. This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the north by IDX Drive, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the south by an auto dealership. 3. Access/circulation.: Access is currently provided by a 32 foot and 45 foot curb cut on IDX Drive and a 24 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. The applicant proposes to: 1) eliminate the Shelburne Road curb cut, 2) extend IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive, and 3) construct two (2) new 24 foot curb cuts on Green Mountain Drive. Circulation on the site is adequate. 4. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 23.9% (maximum allowed is 30% and includes parking garage). Overall coverage is 66.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 0%, along IDX Drive is 31.8%, and along Green Mountain Drive is 21.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Front yard coverage along IDX Drive is proposed to be exceeded. The Planning Commission allowed this coverage to be exceeded under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations as part of the preliminary plat approval. 5. The existing building and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Green Mountain Drive. The proposed setback is 32 feet. The applicant sought a waiver from the front setback requirement as provided under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. A 12 foot setback was approved as part of the preliminary plat approval. 6. Parkina: A total of 1538 spaces are required and 1425 spaces are provided including 26 handicapped spaces. This represents a 113 space or 7.3% shortfall. The Commission, as part of preliminary plat approval, agreed to base parking calculation on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and exclude the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. The total parking required would be 1456 spaces which would result in a 31 space or 2.1 % space shortfall. 7. Parking structure: The proposed parking structure is in substantial compliance with the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures." The parking layout within the structure has been revised since preliminary plat approval such that the maximum distance between parking spaces and nearest exit stairwell is less than 200 feet. The applicant has not provided sufficient lighting information within the parking structure to determine compliance with the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. The guidelines require that two (2) elevators be provided. The applicant indicated that the State will not require elevators because this is a private parking structure. The Planning Commission agreed to not require elevators. 8. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $257,950 which is being met. Proposed plantings include: Red Maple, Green Ash, Crabapple, Honeylocust, Sugar Maple, Birch, Pin Oak, Shadblow, Spruce, Pine, Viburnum, Juniper, and Wintercreeper. Landscaping plan should be revised to provide street trees on the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Additional evergreen landscaping should be provided around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. 9. Preliminary plat condition # l 3b required that parking be shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle and parking and the proposed r.o.w. (at the northwest corner of the site) and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. This condition has been met. 10. Building_ height: Section 25.1 13(a) of the zoning regulations limits the height of a flat roof structure to 35 feet. The proposed addition will have a height of 68 feet from the average pre - construction grade. This is 33 feet greater than permitted. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non-residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i)) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. Preliminary plat stipulation #9 granted the height waiver. 11. Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires additional front, side and rear setbacks for taller structures. The proposed addition will meet the additional setback requirements. K 12. Height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level is 32 feet. 13. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District BBW): This property is located in the BBW District. Under Section 23.20 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. The final plat plans incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes. 14. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation requested is 25,800 gpd (this includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. Preliminary plat stipulation # 10 requires that no Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 15. Traffic: Two (2) traffic impact studies were submitted dated November 19, 1998 and January 21, 1999. The studies indicate the following: 1) Overall levels of service during the A.M. and P.M. peak hour north of IDX are acceptable with the IDX expansion in year 2005. 2) IDX Drive/US 7 operates poorly during the 2005 A.M. build scenario. 3) South of IDX Drive, certain intersections operate at poor levels of service by year 2005. The study further concludes that all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service after the Route 7 widening project. In a letter dated January 26, 1999, the VAOT indicates that the widening of Route 7 will correct any problems associated with the IDX expansion, including the coordination of traffic signals in the corridor. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $110,000. 16. Dumpsters: The dumpsters will be located inside the building. 17. Lighting Proposed exterior lighting consists of the following: — twelve (12) 100 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 43" bollards. — nine (9) 27 watt flourescent lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. thirteen (13) 100 watt halogen stake -mounted uplights. three (3) 100 watt halogen surface -mounted uplights. forty-four (44) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 20 foot poles with downcasting shielded fixtures. eleven (11) fountain lights. 18. Existing exterior lights consist of the following: nine (9) 250 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures. A point by point lighting plan was submitted which indicates that the average illumination on the site is 1.4 to 1.6 foot candles. This meets the City's lighting standards. 19. Sidewalk: The applicant should construct a sidewalk along their frontage on Green Mountain Drive. The sidewalk should be constructed as part of the street construction. 20. Phasinii: This project will be constructed in three (3) main phases. Phase I would begin in the summer of 1999 and consist of constructing the east wing of the main building including the connecting link and the extension of both IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. Phase II would begin in 2000 and involve constructing the parking structure. Phase III would begin in 2002 and would involve constructing the west wing of the main building. Staff recommended that this approval be conditioned on obtaining the zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. 21. Other: the "residential zone" on sheet SP 1 should be noted as "R4 District." plans do not comply with preliminary plat condition #13 that requires the plan to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. applicant has submitted evidence that these plans have been submitted to the City Water Department. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. H 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) ofthe zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space or 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted 5 to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen landscaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. c) The site plan (sheet SP 1) shall be revised to change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. e) The plans shall be revised to show all ground mounted generators/cooling equipment/HVAC equipment. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. 16. In order to make a determination that the project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left -turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 78,000 square feet of office space). Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Shelburne Road widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled, "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/21/99. For a period of five (5) years starting 10/l/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a year) progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. 6 17. The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Any phase which has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 19. The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP1, SP2, SP3 and L.l) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. e Chairman or Clerk ' South Burlington Planning Commission Date ' 7 ECEIVED SEP z 4 2004 of So. Burlington IDX PARKING OPTIONS SKETCH PLAN - EXISTING FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 1" = 100' ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS y, y 10 SEPTEMBER 2004 x A E�P ,-�Ja i D X CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 7, 2005 Ernest P. Christianson, Regional Engineer Wastewater Management Regional Office —Essex Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation i11 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dear Ernie, The City of South Burlington has learned that BDP Realty Associates intends to submit a minor amendment to Land Use Permit No. 4CO391-9 (the "Act 250 Permit") which authorized the expansion of the IDX Corporate Campus located near Route 7 in South Burlington. It is my understanding that in conjunction with this minor amendment application, BDP Realty Associates must receive confirmation from your office that it is not required to amend Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0442-1. Permit #WW-4-0442-1, issued on June 17, 1999, allocated 25,800 gallons per day of wastewater flows to the Bartlett Bay wastewater treatment plant. Prior to the issuance of Permit #WW-4-0442-1, on February 2, 1999, in its final plat approval under Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations, the City of South Burlington approved the 25,800 gallons per day allocation with no expiration date; however, at that time there was no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay treatment facility. Therefore, BDP Realty Associates was informed that it would be put on a waiting list until that allocation was available. Since this project received final plat approval and Permit #WW-4- 0442-1 was issued, the treatment plant upgrade was completed and capacity has become available. At that time, BDP Realty Associates was moved off the waiting list and received a valid 25,800 gallon per day allocation. To date, this allocation remains valid and in good standing with our office. If you have any questions regarding this allocation, please give us a call. Sincerely, Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning cc: File DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 OCTOBER 2004 The applicant said they could probably tweak the lot lines to meet minimum lot size. Sketch plan application #SD-04-73 of Peter Smichenko to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 233,133 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of: 1) adding three floors to the east wing containing 87,234 sq ft, 2) constructing a 4-story west wing containing 64,025 sq ft, and 3) constructing a 542 space parking structure, 40 IDX Drive. Also, construction of a 155 space parking area at 35 Green Mountain Drive for use by the offices at 40 IDX Drive: Mr. Schroeder said there are no changes from what was approved in 1999. There are, however, 2 small differences: an interim phase that would be served by surface parking (the would raze a building owned by IDX and use that area for parking), and a change in the timing. Mr. Dinklage said the Board will asked that the applicant build what is shown in the rendering. Mr. Smichenko said they agree to do that. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. C16rk /1-0 -G iY Date -7- October 20, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: IDX campus expansion Dear Ray: As a follow up to our conversation of last week, I have reviewed the scope of the first phase of construction and compared it to the total project for the purpose of establishing the phase 1 impact fees. The square footage of the project is 260,184 square feet. Phase 1 consists of 116,000 square feet and represents 45% of the total project. The sewer impact fee for the total project is $ 110,000.00, and the traffic impact fee is $ 64,500.00 Based on the above, I request the phase 1 sewer and traffic impact fees be established at $ 49,500.00 and $ 29025.00 respectively. Prior to having IDX issue these checks, I will contact you and verify your approval of this proposal. Thank You. Sincerely, Brad I Carter President cc: Ms. Michelle Russo, IDX Systems Corporation L. - 14�k� - 15/ shielded fixtures. eleven (1.1) fountain lights. 18. Existing exterior lights consist of the following: nine (9) 250 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures. A point by point lighting plan was submitted which indicates that the average illumination on the site is 1.4 to 1.6 foot candles. This meets the City's lighting standards. 19. Sidewalk: The applicant should construct a sidewalk along their frontage on Green Mountain Drive. The sidewalk should be constructed as part of the street construction. 20. Phasing: This project will be constructed in three (3) main phases. Phase I would begin in the summer of 1999 and consist of constructing the east wing of the main building including the connecting link and the extension of both IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. Phase II would begin in 2000 and involve constructing the parking structure. Phase III would begin in 2002 and would involve constructing the west wing of the main building. Staff recommended that this approval be conditioned on obtaining the zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. 21. Other: — the "residential zone" on sheet SP1 should be noted as "R4 District." — plans do not comply with preliminary plat condition #13 that requires the plan to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. — applicant has submitted evidence that these plans have been submitted to the City Water Department. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 4 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) ofthe zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space or 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of25,800 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted 61 to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen landscaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. c) The site plan (sheet SP 1) shall be revised to change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. e) The plans shall be revised to show all ground mounted generators/cooling equipment/HVAC equipment. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. 16. In order to make a determination that the project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left -turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 78,000 square feet of office space). Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Shelburne Road widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled, "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/21/99. For a period of five (5) years starting 10/1/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a year) progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. 6 17. The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Any phase wich has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 19. The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP1, SP2, SP3 and L.1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Chairman or Clerk 7/ South Burlington Planning Commission Date 7 ■wx® Making a Difference in Healthcare- �V IDX Systems Corporation 40 IDX Drive tel 802.862.1022 PO Box 1070 fax 802.862.6848 Burlington, VT 05402 url www.idx.com October 1, 2004 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Raymond 3. Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David I Scott Director of Program Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX Systems Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Attached is our Transportation Demand Management Plan Update for April 2004. Please note that our programs remain unchanged since the last filing. We continue to offer the information and programs as described in the update. Sincerely, Lynne A. Weaver Corporate Services & Facilities Enclosure Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2004 UPDATE • Facilities Database and New Webpage IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific transportation alternatives available through the CCTA as well as providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. At the current time, we are developing a Facilities webpage, which will link the information we promote in our Facilities Database. When completed, this will provide easy access to our employees who prefer to use our intranet page! • New Hire Orientation Package Information regarding CCTA Ride Share and Guaranteed Ride Home programs is provided to all IDX new hires in Burlington. Included in this orientation is the IDX form to sign up for the CCTA Monthly Bus Pass, subsidized at 100% by IDX. The CCTA Monthly Bus Pass sign-up form, including instructions to the employee, is also in the IDX Forms Database, providing online availability to all Burlington employees as an transportation option. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our onsite cafeteria, which is heavily subsidized, has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early, since it opens at 7:30 AM and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. • Transportation Alternatives IDX continues to provide 100% subsidy of monthly bus passes to those employees who wish to utilize this option. Communication of the transportation alternatives is handled through the New Hire Orientation and the IDX Forms Database, available to all Burlington employees. • New Pre -Tax Transportation Benefit Program Although this does not have an immediate implication in Burlington as we fund Burlington 100%, we have instituted a company -wide Pre -Tax Transportation Benefit Program to offer employees the benefit of paying for qualified commuter expenses using pre-tax dollars. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 OORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 10, 2004 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the October 19, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �W Betsy lefMc W�aponough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING; 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 15, 2004 Peter Smichenko Director, Corporate Services & Facilities IDX Systems Corp. PO Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Re: IDX Campus Dear Mr. Smichenko: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy Mc nough Administ tive Assistant Encl. Permit Number SD- 0 � -- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, South Burlington, Vermont 05403, Phone (802) 862-1022 Fax 802) 862-8098. 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Deeds to IDX Systems Corporation recorded at Book 447 at Page 133; Book 501 at Page 513; Book 501 at Page 518. 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Peter Smichenko, Director, Corporate Services & Facilities, IDX Systems Corporation, 40 IDX Drive, P.O. Box 1070, Burlington, VT 05402- 1070, Phone (802) 859-4135, Fax (802) 862-8098. 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee simple. 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as applicant. 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 40 IDX Drive; 35 Green Mountain Drive. 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0915-00040; 0720-00035. 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) 40 IDX Drive: 124,208 square foot office building, 88,449 square foot east wing containing storage and office space, 20,476 square foot cafeteria/connector, 732 striped surface parking spaces and related site improvements. 35 GM Drive: 14,389 square foot office/production building, parking lot and related site improvements. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses -to remain) Existing: Existing uses at 40 IDX Drive to remain, except for approximately 164 parking spaces that will be supplanted by the west wing and parking structure. } New first phase: New construction adding 3 floors to the east wing, containing 87,234 square feet of office, and construction of new parking lots containing a total of 163 surface parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive; demolition of existing improvements and construction of a new parking lot containing 155 parking spaces at 35 GM Drive. New second phase: New construction of a four-story west wing containing 64,025 square feet of office space at 40 IDX Drive; new construction of a parking structure containing 542 parking spaces at 40 IDX Drive to replace surface parking at 35 GM Drive and 40 IDX Drive. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Existing original office building: 124,208 sf Existing east wing and connector: 108,925 sf Proposed first phase building: 87,234 sf Proposed second phase building: 64,025 sf* 2 Total: 384,39 sf *excludes parking structure d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) Approximately 66 feet above existing pre -construction grade. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Not applicable. f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) This application proposes the remainder of the planned expansion of the IDX campus at 40 IDX Drive. The South Burlington Planning Commission previously granted planned unit development for the entire expansion preliminary plat approval granted December 8, 1999, final plat approval granted January 26, 2000). The previous approval contemplated phased construction. Phase I was to include the addition of a six floor east wing containing approximately 175,683 square feet of office and storage space and a 20,476 square foot cafeteria/connector building, and the extension of IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive. Phase II was to consist of a three -level parking structure containing 679 parking spaces, and Phase III was to consist of the addition of a four floor west wins containing approximately 64.025 square feet of office space. IDX has completed part of Phase I of the approved development. including the addition of the cafeteria/connector buildingand three -.of the six floors planned for the east wing containing approximately 88,449 square feet of office and storage space, the Green Mountain Drive extension, and surface parking lots and related site improvements. Construction has not proceeded as quicklyas s originally_planned, and the Planning Commission approvals for the remainder of the development have now expired. IDX now proposes to complete Phase I as previously approved by adding three floors to the new east wing, containing approximately 87,234 square feet of additional office space. IDX would construct a total of approximately 318 additional surface parking spaces on site at 40 IDX Drive and off site at 35 Green Mountain Drive. A proportional share of these additional surface parking spaces would be provided as I DX occupies each of the additional three floors. IDX also proposes to reduce the size of the parking structure, and to construct it later, simultaneously with the construction of the proposed west wing. This planned unit development is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. IDX constructed all of the proposed stormwater treatment systems required in this Overlay District as part of the first phase of the development. 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building 40 IDX Drive: Existing 13% Proposed 24% 35 GM Drive: Existing 62% Proposed 0% b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) 40 IDX Drive: Existing 70% Proposed 70% 35 GM Drive: Existing 62% Proposed 62% c) Front yard (along each street) 40 IDX Drive (along IDX Drive): 40 IDX Drive (along GM Drive): 35 GM Drive: Existing 32% Proposed 32% Existing 4% Proposed 22% Existing 17% Proposed 21 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) According to the Warranty Deeds by which IDX acquired the property (referenced in Paraaranh 2 above). 40 IDX Drive is subiect to (i) electric. telephone. aas. sewer and other utility easements, (ii) spring rights, (iii) a right of way along the south side of the Property, and (iv) state and municipal land use permits and amendments, and may be subject to protective covenants imposed by National Life Insurance Company in connection with the subdivision of this area in the late 1970s, and 35 Green Mountain Drive is subject only to an Act 250 land use permit and amendments thereto. 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) IDX has completed the extension of IDX Drive to Green Mountain Drive, and the extension of municipal utilities to serve all phases of the proposed development, as contemplated in the previous Planning Commission approvals. 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER: lDX Systems Corpora ion By Its DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this sketch �,Complete Do not write below this line application and find it to be: of Planning & Zoning or Designee Property Address Property Owner Name and Mailing Address (per 2004 Grand List) 40 IDX Drive Contiguous Properties (includes properties directly across public roads): 1333 Shelburne Road Edward B. Crane, Trustee, 95 Hawn Drive, Box 1799, Frisco, CO 80443 1335 Shelburne Road same as above 1341 Shelburne Road same as above See Way Care Wash, Inc., 368 Olde Orchard Lane, Shelburne, VT 05482 1459 Shelburne Road Anthony Socinski, 1459 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1475 Shelburne Road Two O' Briens Properties, LLC, 1475 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 1485 Shelburne Road DBS Limited Partnership, c/o Goss Dodge, Inc., 1485 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, VT 05043 1580 Shelburne Road Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 7 Green Dolphin Drive Sarah E. Weber, 7 Green Dolphin Drive, So. Burlington, VT 054032 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 75 Green Mountain Drive Pammella and George Starbuck Family Trust, 147 West Shore Road, Grand Isle, VT 05458 40 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 35 Green Mountain Drive Contiguous Properties (includes properties directly across public roads 30 Green Mountain Drive Allson Partnership, Ross Anderson, Box 1100, Burlington, VT 05402 45 Green Mountain Drive Meadowood Enterprises, 212 Meadow Wood Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 85 Green Mountain Drive NPIRE, 85 Green Mountain Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05043 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE IDX anticipates that it start construction of the remainder of the east wine and the surface narking lots in Shrine 2005. and will complete exterior construction by Fall 2006. Based on current growth rates, IDX estimates that it will start construction of the west wine and the parking structure between 2009 and 2011. and will complete exterior construction within 18 months. 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: IDX S Its ED SURFACE F APPROXIMATE FOOTF FUTURE PARKING ST EXISTING SURFACE L IDX PARKING OPTIONS SKETCH PLAN FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 1 = 100' ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS y y 10 SEPTEMBER 2004 W R F E P 9- "ek-oC� ?e,fa ka, �OIA,i,a � wad +o rn6uc, �.t�:�,n� yc�ot�. � Pha.ap.TIT, vr�s Cor"e, -7 I,ardsea.p�%��- Pc@�(,i r� 3.5 Spaces per 1,000 sf Existing Square Footage 0) 212,657 sf IF Phase II Square Footage 87,234 sf Phase III Square Footage 64,025 sf 9 WAX Making a Difference in Healthcare Required Parking lo 730 Existing �"> th� • �� C� 744 Spaces -�670 ; 55 00 lo 155-172 Upper Lot 200 Bldg Required Parking 305 Spaces 145-155 35 GMD G"'> 35 u Lp—cn kbiT"w lot 1049 Subtotal In front off 2h0 (50 sp&ees) Upper Lot 200 (165 spaces) sp-C,L 4n gCAV-J(, 437 Parking Garage 2 (Rounding) 1273 Total Required 1273 Total G) Coesnot include square footag5o�i�(20,476 so as approved by So. Burlington Planning Commission per FF&D GO Does not include paved upper lot which accommodates approximately 100+ cars behind 200 Building - 215 Spaces Lost ("') Target spaces identified as 155 for upper 200 Building (increases to existing) and 150 for 35 GMD 01-26-1999 3.5 Spaces per 1,000 sf Parking Phase to Coincide with Projected Occupancy a Making a Difference in Healthcare u Spaces Needed 102 Upper Lot 200 155 (Target) 155 Subtotal Spaces Needed 102 35 GMD 150 (Target) 305 Spaces Needed 101 Total Required 305 Total Projected 305 LIGHT❑SPACE❑DESIGN January 4, 1999 Tim Duff Kessel Duff Corporation 57 Talcott Rd Williston, VT 05495 Dear Tim: Enclosed are the results of the parking lot design photometric analysis for the new IDX complex. In accordance with IES recommendations for moderate activity commercial parking lots, I have designed to an average maintained illuminance of 1.4 to 1.6 footcandles, with a contrast ratio not exceeding 12 to 1. The contrast ratio is an important indication of the overall quality of the lighting. The lower the contrast ratio, the more evenly distributed the lighting. When metal halide lamps are initially installed, illuminance will be slightly higher. The following chart provides a summary of calculation results shown in attached drawings in more detail. The site has been divided into 5 sections to better arrive at an appropriate lighting layout for each parking area. Existing measured site illuminance ranges from a high of 8 footcandles to less than 0.1 footcandles. Statistical Area Average fc Maximum fc Minimum fc Avg/Min Ratio Northeast 1.42 524 0-17 8.35 Quadrant Northwest 1.44 3.91 0.28 5.14 Quadrant Southwest 154 6.85 0_17 9.06 Quadrant South Central 1.61 5.65 0.31 5.19 GarageUpper Deck 1.32 3.30 0.22 6.00 Higher average illuminance is achieved through the installation of high quality fixtures which have superior sharp cutoff photometry and excellent horizontal distribution in the 20-70 degree range. Metal halide lamps will be used throughout, except for similar color compact fluorescents at the perimeter of the garage deck. These lamps provide color rendering indices in the range of 65 to 82. A schedule of fixtures is also included. Please note that luminaires on poles carry the designation of the pole type, ie., P-0 for 250w type 3, P-1 for 25Ow type 5, and P2-2 for 175w type 3 on 14' pole. All other luminaires are building mounted or bollards. Fixture cuts are supplied for all types listed. The landscape architect has proposed a different bollard, which should be acceptable from a light output standpoint if the basic light distribution features are similar to the unit specified herein. 7 IRIS LANE • S. BURLINGTON, VT • 05403 PHONE: 802-860-7244 — 2 — JANuARY 4,1999 The following totals include the number of each fixture type on the total site, not including interior levels of the parking deck. Type Number of units B10 - Bollards, see landscape architectural plan see landscape architects plan BG226 - Garage low perimeter wall mounted 20 luminaire, 2 (26w) CF GRQ25MP-V - Post top mounted semi -spherical 47 sharp cutoff luminaire, Type 5 distribution, metal halide 250w, Pole type P-0 GR325MP-III - Post top mounted semi -spherical 23 sharp cutoff luminaire, Type 3 distribution, metal halide 250w, Pole type P-1 GRC17-III - Post top mounted semi -spherical sharp 9 cutoff luminaire, Type 3 distribution, metal halide 175w, lower Pole type P2-2 GDC25w - Wall mounted semi -spherical sharp 5 cutoff luminaire, Forward throw distribution, metal halide 250w, for lighting parking area from garage facade GDC17w - Wall mounted semi -spherical sharp 6 cutoff luminaire, Forward throw distribution, metal halide 175w, for lighting service areas Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, Donna J. eban. AIA NE Quadrant r!� i i I ir. .I NW Quadrant Site Plan View Scale: Scale to Fit IDX Site Lighting Shelburne Rd at l lolmes Rd extension EM Light/Space/Design South Burlington, VT 1 /3/99 Prepared for: Kessel-Duff Corporation Project No.: 98-8-KDC Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com yid--4•'�` )� � 1 - �� wi��r.�.wanw�awn�wr,�cewa•�-��.sru�� Ak OWE For 1101 99 111mmig low • 1DX Site Design, / extension,Shelburne Rd at Holmes St , _LigBurlington, Prepared for: Kessel Duff Corporation Pro ect No.: 98-8-KDC Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder. Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com CP/MP POST TOP Featuring New Form IOX Optical System GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Post Top Mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CP) or semispherical (MP) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 400 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class I anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. Optional twin glow rings at post top are available in 4 colors and are illuminated by the primary source. n R n F R 1 m n HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION WATTAGE VOLTAGE CP 17" 1 1 (Horizontal See 120 BLA: Black Anodized HF Table 208 BRA: Bronze Anodized HS MP 22" __-� 3 (Horizontal Below 240 NA: Natural Anodized LF Lamp) 277 BLIP: Black Paint PC 347 BRP: Bronze Paint PCR 4X,6•7,6 (Horizontal 480 NP: Natural Aluminum Paint POLY Lamp) WP: White Paint GRC (Horizontal SC: Special Color (specify) GRY Lamp) GRR GRR TYPE HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 1 CP17 MP17 CP22 MP22 Ah An 100 HPS 100 HPS 250 HPS 250 HPS 100 MV 100 MV 250 MV 250 MV 50W MH 2 50W MH 1 250 MH 250 MH 70W MH 2 70W MH 2 400 HPS 400 HPS 100 MH 2 100 MH - 400 MV 400 MV 150 HPS' 150 HPS' 400 MH 400 MH 175 MV 175 MV 175 MH 175 MH 250 MV 250 MH HE In Head Fusing HS: House Side Shield (types 3 and 4X only) LF: In Pole Fusing PC,: Receptacle and Photocontrol PCR': Photocontrol - Receptacle Only POLY'-': Polycarbonate Sag Lens GRC: Glow Ring Clear GRY: Glow Ring Yellow GRG: Glow Ring Green GRR: Glow Ring Red 1. Furnished with non yellow acrylic sag lens. 5. 175W max on 17" units VS not available with 17" mogul base units 6. 22" units only 2. Medium base lamp 7. Contact factory for availability 3. 55 volt lamp 8. Furnished with sag glass lens 4. Not available in MP units or 480V 9. Not available with 4X 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 --- FAX 510/357-3088 GAPE — — elaruiu GENERAL: Each Gardco Form 10 Post Top Mounted Hardtop is a cylindrical (CP) or semi -spherical (MP) sharp cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain -tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassem- bly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. Optional twin glow rings at post top are available in 4 colors and are illuminated by the primary downlight source. HOUSING: Housing is one piece, .100" seamless aluminum with integral rolled circumferential reveal and lower section aperture incorporating a returned flange stiffener to protect against housing edge deformation. Units are offered in profiles of 17" or 22" diameter. YOKE: The 9/w" diameter parallel yokes of high strength, low mass schedule 40 steel are precision contoured to match the CP or MP housing silhouette. Welds or fasteners are not visible at the luminaire or pole attachment. Yoke is electrogalvanized and coated with satin black polyurethane. LENS: One piece, die cast aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Type 4X luminaire features sag glass lens and type ® it M E N S; 1 0 � S VS unit employs sag acrylic lens. Concealed stainless steel hinge and two (2) flush'/4 turn fasteners secure lens assembly to luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form Ten optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve Types 1, 3, 0, Q, FM or VS distributions (see pattern illustrations). The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell — all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 50W MH, 70W MH and 100 MH units have medium base lampholder. All horizontal Metal Halide units in the 22" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -200 F. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured within the luminaire, above the reflector system. High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto transformers providing ± 10%(MH) and ± 5%(MV) power regulation with a ±10% variation from rated input voltage. Component -to - component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 1500 C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC,15A or higher. FINISH: Anodized housings are created with an Aluminum Association Architec- tural Class I anodizing process to achieve a bronze, black or natural aluminum finish. Painted units are finished with hardcoat, fade resistant, electrostatically applied polyurethane. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL and CSA (where applicable) wet location and I.B.E.W. labels. Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improve- ment program. Gardco's segmented reflector optical system has been awarded U.S. Patent #3746854. Post Top Luminaires protected by U.S. Design Patents #290, 408, 290 and 409. Form 10X (4X) optical system is U.S. Patent Pending. CP Style I MP Style l A Photocell to aeon )oPtlonaq O i e a D D C n Approx. CP STYLE SIZE A 6 C D EPA Weight 17" 17' 8 " 10" 18" .7 31 Ibs 22' 22' 11" 11' 22" 1.0 50lbs 2661 Alvarado Street Approx. San Leandro, CA 94577 MP STYLE SIZE A B C D EPA Weight U.S. 800/227-0758 CA 5101357-6900 17" 17' 11" 10" 21" .7 32 lbs —� FAX 510/357-3088 22" 22" 14 " 11' 25" 1.0 50 lbs GIB P-DCO 11, t I F1'ING 79115.391 895 ) HARDTOP 1 of �vf ?� r CW/MW WALL MOUNT: Featuring New Form 10X Optical System GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Round Wall Mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CW) or semi -spherical (MW) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 400 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class I anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of four (4) interchange- able precision optical systems. O R D E R I N G HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS CW 17 1 3 250 MH 120 BRA CW 17" 1 1 (Horizontal See 120 BLA: Black Anodized HF Table 208 BRA: Bronze Anodized HS _ MW 22" 3 (Horizontal Below 240 NA: Natural Anodized PC Lamp) 277 BLP: Black Paint PCR 347 BRP: Bronze Paint POLY 05°' (Horizontal 480 NP: Natural Aluminum Paint Lamp) WP: White Paint FM (Horizontal SC: Special Color (specify) Lamp) TYPE HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 1 1 -- 1 WATTAGE OPTIONS Housing CW17 MW17 CW22 MW22 �I Am a A& 100 HPS 100 HPS 250 HPS 250 HPS 100 MV 100 MV 250 MV 250 MV 50W MH 50W MH' 250 MH 250 MH 70W MH' 70W MH' 400 HPS 400 HPS 100 MH' 100 MH' 400 MV 400 MV 150 HPS= 150 HPS2 400 MH 400 MH 175 MV 175 MV 175 MH 175 MH 250 MV 250 MH NOTES HF: Head Fuse HS: House Side Shield (types 3 and 4X only) PC,: Receptacle and Photocontrol PCR': Photocontrol - Receptacle Only POLY' 6: Polycarbonate Sag Lens 1. Medium base lamp 5. Furnished with sag glass lens 2. 55 volt lamp 6. Available only with 22" units 3. Not available in MW or 480V 7. Contact factory for availability. 4. 175W max on 17" units 8. Not available with 4X 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 510/357-3088 w `- Gardlco MOUNTHARDTOP CW/MW WALL S P E C I F I C A T I O N S GENERAL: Each Gardco Form 10 Wall Mounted Hardtop is a cylindrical (CW) or semi -spherical (MW) sharp cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain -tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. No venting of optical system or electrical components is required or permitted. Luminaires are completely assembled with no disassembly required for installation. Lamping requires no lifting or hinging the luminaire housing, disturbing wiring or exposing uninsulated live parts. HOUSING: Housing is one piece, .100" seamless aluminum with integral rolled circumferential reveal and lower section aperture incorporating a returned flange stiffener to protect against housing edge deformation. Units are offered in profiles of 17" or 22" diameter. 1 WALL BRACKET: Hooking diecast / aluminum wall bracket conceals 10 ga. mounting plate. Extruded arm extends unit from wall and includes integral channel which captures tie rods for proper luminaire alignment. LENS: One piece, die cast aluminum door frame retains the optically clear, heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass or sag D I M E N S I O N S polycarbonate in a sealed manner using hollow section, high compliance, memory retentive extruded silicone rubber. Type 4X unit features sag glass lens. Concealed stainless steel hinge and two (2) flush 114 turn fasteners secure lens assembly to luminaire. OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented Form Ten optical system is homogeneous sheet aluminum, electrochemically brightened, anodized and sealed. The segmented reflectors are set in faceted arc tube image duplicator patterns to achieve Types 1, 3, 0, and FM distribu- tions (see pattern illustrations). The mogul base lampholder is glazed porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell — all securely attached to the reflector assembly. 50W MH, 70W MH and 100 MH units have medium base lampholders. All Metal Halide units in the 22" housings have lamp stabilizers ensuring precise arc tube positioning. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -200 F. The ballast is mounted on a unitized tray and secured within the luminaire, above the reflector system. High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto transformers providing ± 10°9(MH) and ±5%(MV) power regulation with a ± 10% variation from rated input voltage. Compo- nent -to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 800% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150' C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC,15A or higher. FINISH: Anodized housings are created with an Aluminum Association Architec- tural Class I anodizing process to achieve a bronze, black or natural aluminum finish. Painted units are finished with hardcoat, fade resistant, electrostatically applied polyurethane. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL and CSA (where applicable) wet location and I.B.E.W. labels. Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. Gardco's segmented reflector optical system has been awarded U.S. Patent #3746854. Form 10X (4X optical System is U.S. Patend Pending. Approx. Approx. CW STYLE SIZE A B C Weight MW STYLE SIZE A B C Weight 17" 17" 8"' 7.5" 291bs 17" 17" 11"' 7.5" 29lbs 22" 22" 11"' 7.5" 45lbs 22" 22" 14"' 7.5" 45lbs C I .. -__ -A- ___ -i 1. With Poly option, overall height =11" 2. With 4X and Poly option, overall height = 14" 3. With Poly option, overall height = 14' 4. With 4X and Poly option, overall height = 17" r_ C A , Wall Bracket Mounting Dimensions 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 - FAX 510/357 3088 E ..t DOME TOP BOLLARD BRM 800 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Gardco's O R D E R I N G BRM800 Dome Top Bollard provides PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE' VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS uniform illumination, wide spacings and BRM 800 42" 70 HPS 120 WP SHD remarkable brightness control. Rugged extruded and cast construction with BRM 800 42' 50MH 120 BRP F silicone seals and gasketing assures 36" 70MH 208 BLP SHD 30" 100MH 240 NP BCC years of trouble free service. 24" 50MV 277 WP DUP 75MV SC GFCI 100MV 35HPS' 50HPS' 70HPS 100HPS INC° TYPE PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 NOTES FINISH OPTIONS 1. Use medium base BRP: Bronze Paint F: In -Line Primary Fuse lamps only. BLP: Black Paint SHD: 180" Shield 2. 120 volt primary only. NP: Natural Aluminum Paint BCC: Black Center Column _ - 3. 120/277V primary only. WP: White Paint DUP: Duplex receptacle' - GFCI: GFCI receptacle' 4. Maximum wattage: VP: Verde Green Paint 10OW A-19. SC: Special Color Weathertight, flush -mounted (specify) in lower housing. 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 5101357 6900 FAX 5101357-3088 BRM 800.. ' " caGardco DOME TOP BOLLARD SPEC I FICATI OHS GENERAL: Each Gardco BRM800 is a bollard luminaire utilizing 35 through 100W high intensity discharge lamps. Luminaire features a precision anodized aluminum reflector system which provides low glare uniform illumination and wide spacing. Units are totally sealed and gasketed preventing intrusion of moisture, dust and insects into the optical or electrical chambers. HOUSING: Dome upper housing is diecast aluminum and bottom cylindrical housing is .125" high strength 6063-T5 extruded aluminum. Bottom section has a welded in cast ring for attachment to base assembly with four (4) hex head set screws. LENS: The lens is .250" clear virgin acrylic positioned between upper and lower housing sections. Silicone gasket completely seals unit and permits thermal expansion. OPTICAL SYSTEM: Electrochemically anodized die formed aluminum reflector provides efficient illumination and brightness control. Hammertoning of reflector assures clean, unstriated beam pattern. SOCKET: Medium base pulse rated lampholder is glazed porcelain with nickel plated reinforced screwshell and spring loaded contact. ANCHORAGE: Base assembly consists of a cast aluminum platform and ballast mounting bracket. Assembly is secured and leveled to the mounting foundation with four (4) 3/8" x 9" x 1 1/2" anchor bolts on a 4 3/4" bolt circle. Ballast is prewired with quick electrical disconnects and mounting bracket is secured with two phillips head screws for ease of installation and servicing. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20, F. High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal Halide and Mercury Vapor ballasts are medium regulation auto transformer providing ± 10% (MH) and ± 15% (MV) power regulation with a ± 50ro variation from rated input voltage. Component -to - component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 800b of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150" C or higher. Plug disconnects are listed by UL for use at 600 VAC, 15A or higher. FINISH: Each luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant electrostatically applied, thermal cured textured polyester powder finish. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL wet location, CSA and I.B.E.W. labels. D I M E N S I O N S A N D M O U N T I N G D E T A I L Note: Factory supplied template must be used when setting anchor bolts. Thomas Lighting will not honor any claim for incorrect anchorage placement from failure to use factory supplied templates. 42' 36" 30' 24" Stub up Projection C-- - , Bolt Projection 3" Max. L, T 7 t + Conduit �� Bolt Circle Opening ( 4, .. 3" 1 --- 8 1 Gardco reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its products without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 5101357-6900 „ - FAX 51D/357-3088 • Wall mounted luminaires for direct or indirect illumination. Anodized aluminum reflector. g Stippled tempered glass behind o. die cast aluminum louvers. 0g.4Captive socket head stainless steel screws. A C Any mounting orientation. Color: Black. Lamp Lumen A B C 2477 Wall 1 100W A•19 1750 9 9 65/15 2447P Wall 2 13W PL 1720 9 9 65/16 2478S Wall 1 35W E•17 HPS 2250 9 9 65/15 2457P Wall 2 26W PLC 3600 125/8 125/8 83/4 2479S Wall 1 70W E•17 HPS 6400 12% 12'A 83/4 2479MH Wall 1 100W ED. 17 MH 8500 125/e 125A 83/4 • S Wall mounted luminaires provide ,a 1 1 an efficient wash of light from a } completely concealed light source. g 0°U Anodized aluminum reflector. qo Stippled tempered glass with step baffle trim. Captive socket head stainless A C steel screws. Downlighting only. Color: Black Lamp Lumen A B C 2480 Wall 1 100W A•19 1750 9 9 6'/4 2482S Wall 1 35W E•17 HPS 2250 9 9 6'/4 2483S Wall 1 50W E•17 HPS 4000 12% 12% 8% 2483MH Wall 1 70W ED•17 MH 5500 12% 125/8 85/8 BEGA 73 GAGardco GPI S P E C I F I C A T I O N S GENERAL: The Gardco GP1 is a cutoff garage luminaire utilizing medium base HID lamps to 175W. Each luminaire features a diecast electrical canopy, an acrylic housing with an uplight window, a vacuum metalized faceted downlight reflector system, a hydroformed uplight reflector, and an acrylic lens. Units are totally sealed and suitable for damp and wet locations. QUICK MOUNT PLATE: A dieformed 14 ga. galvanized steel plate is supplied for mounting to a recessed, surface, or rigid pendant hung 4" j-box (standard j-box and rigid pendant by others). An integral hanger tab on the plate supports the luminaire during wiring. UPPER ELECTRICAL CANOPY: The diet astaluminum canopy houses the ballast and wiring splices. After wiring, the canopy swings up and snaps securely to the Quick Mount Plate without tools. ( M O U N T I N G f HOUSING: The housing consists of a one piece acrylic housing with prismatic uptight window and opaque lower side section. The housing is fully gasketed to the upper canopy. DOWNLIGHT REFLECTOR: Semi-specular vacuum metalized aluminum facets are precisely positioned to provide highly efficient Type 1 R (rectangular) lighting distributions and sharp cut-off of source brightness at normal viewing angles. UPLIGHT REFLECTOR: The hydroformed and anodized aluminum reflector is designed to generate illumination on the ceiling and vertical surfaces. DOWNLIGHT LENS: An injection molded UV resistant acrylic lens is retained with captive fasteners. The lens hinges down for relamping. Memory retentive silicone gasketing seals the lens to the housing. Flush of surface mounMgis easily accomplished with a galvanized steel quick nwurrtpiete (standard j boxby others). Forngidpandant mounting to conduit (by others), the Gardco Quick Mount plafe is dined aftached to a standud 4" j-box, as in surface ceiling mounted applications. An offset, sell -leveling jboxbalances the luminaire in those cases where the pendant mount is free swingingthe cast aluminum box is finished to match the luminaire. (Swivel ceding canopy and pendant by others.) For this option speedy ✓B when ordering. ELECTRICAL: Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type, capable of providing reliable lamp starting down to -20°F. High Pressure Sodium ballasts operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal Halide ballasts are medium regulation auto transformer providing t10% power regulation with a t10% variation from rated input voltage. Component -to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600 VAC at 150' or higher. FINISH: The upper canopy is finished with polyester powder coat. The opaque housing section is finished with acrylic lacquer. Architectural grey finish is standard. LABELS: All fixtures bear UL Wet Location and IBEW labels. O P T I O N S Gardco reserves 117e right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as pact of the company's continuingploductimprovementprogram. Tire DR (DownflgirtOnly Reflector) option provides an additional spun aluminum lower reflector which will significantly increase pavement illumination and mask any undesired nphght. Practical options include a bird excluding shroud which prevents neshogandpemhing. reducing did andmamienance. A 12`mimmum pendant length required 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S. 800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 5101357-3088 hap://www.thomaslighfing.com/outdoor/ T ?:�" M � „ CGardco — _— i GP1 GARAGE LUMINAIRE - TYPE 1 R GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco GP1 is a cutoff luminaire designed specifically for parking garage lighting. The Type 1 R rectangular lighting distribution was developed to precisely conform to the geometry of parking structures. In addition, the precision diecast aluminum canopy, the corrosion resistant acrylic housing, and the moisture, insect, and pollutant excluding silicone gasketing all assure long fixture life. O R D E R I N G Example: PREFIX WATTAGE VOLTAGE OPTIONS GP1 175MH POLY 120 GP1 70HPS 120 HCQS 100HPS 208 IDS 150HPS 240 MS 70MH 277 POLY 10OMH TP 150MH' F 175MH FF DR 1. ANSI #MI02BX t Lamp (100W max.) 2. D.C. Bayonet JB 3. Hot/Cold Quartz Restrike with time delay 4. Hot Quartz Restrike without time delay LFI 5. Consult factory H/L Hot/Cold Quartz Restrike 2.3 Quartz Restrike 2,4 Emergency Socket 2 Polycarbonate Downlight Lens Spanner Head Tamper Resistant Screws Single Fuse (120V, 277V) Double Fuse (208V, 240V) Supplementary Downlight Reflector (provides additional area illumination and masks uptight. Bird Excluding Shroud (for pendant mount units) Balanced cast j-box with offset K.O. for non -rigid sway pendant mount Lamp Factory Installed Hi/Lo Lighting System 5 TYPE PREFIX WATTAGE VOLTAGE OPTIONS GP1 GPl GPI GP1 GP1 D I M E N S I O N S '1l1 .� .� 16.25" SO fJ 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 510/357.3088 hop://www.thomaslighting-com/outdoor/ N Heindel and Noyes • Consulting Hydrogeologists • Engineers • Environmental Scientists PO. Box 64709 Burlington, Vermont 054064709 802-658-0820 Fax 802-860-1014 ..January 21, 1999 Ms. Debra A. Bell -JTrudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 308 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 RE- IDX 1998/1999 Expansion Dear Debra: This letter/report presents the results of our hydrologic evaluation of the proposed IDX expansion project on Shelburne Road. The proposed development is located within the North Brook portion of the Bartlett Brook watershed. The analysis was performed using information provided by your office for the project site. This included the computation of existing and proposed impervious area, and the identification of relevant soil types. Heindel and Noyes computed a hydraulic curve number for post development conditions and the data was input into the existing data file for the entire watershed. An evaluation was performed for the 2-year and 24-year, 24-hour storms, which result in 2.2 and 4.0 inches of rainfall, respectively, in South Burlington. To evaluate the overall impact of the proposed expansion on the watershed, peak discharge rates have been computed at four locations. Peak discharge rates are calculated for three different scenarios: pre -development, post -development and post - development with an enlarged detention basin. At the outflow of the site, the projected peak discharge rate is 29.8 cfs for the existing condition. For the post -development condition, a significant increase in peak discharge is projected (59.2 cfs). Peak flows are predicted to decrease to 22.2 cfs with the expansion of the existing wet pond on site. At the point where North Brook crosses Shelburne Road, the peak discharge rate is 155.1 cfs, 186.6 cfs and 142.1 cfs for pre - development conditions, post -development conditions, and post -development conditions with an enlarged detention pond. At the point where North Brook crosses the railroad tracks (adjacent to the Bartlett Bay Sewage Treatment Plant), the peak discharge rates are 197.6 cfs, 232.0 cfs and 183.8 cfs for pre -development conditions, post -development conditions and post -development conditions with an enlarged wet pond, respectively. At the base of the watershed (Bartlett Bay), the peak discharge rates are 121.5 cfs and 120.1 cfs for pre -development and post -development conditions with an expanded wet pond, respectively. The model projects that the increased runoff from the IDX expansion without an expanded pond would result in flooding of the stream channel at the base of the watershed. Ms. Debra A. Bell .lanuary 21, 1999 Page 2 A summary of peak discharge rates at these various points in the watershed for pre-, post- and post -development conditions with an enlarged pond is attached. Also attached are schematic drawings of pre- and post- development drainage scenarios. 'This information is summarized in the following table. Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates Location Pre -Development Conditions (cfs) Post -Development Conditions (cfs) Post -Development Conditions w/ Expanded Pond (cfs) Site Outlet 28.3 59.2 22.7 Shelburne Road Culvert 155.1 186.6 142.1 Railroad Tracks Culvert 197.6 232.0 183.8 Base of Watershed 121.5 NA 120.1 A significant increase in peak discharge is projected throughout the watershed as a result of the proposed expansion. Based on these results, it is our conclusion that the storm water management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission for the Bartlett Brook/North Brook watershed would be better met with the expansion of the existing storm water detention pond on the IDX site. Modeling of the site and its immediate watershed (30 acres) projects an increase from 29.8 cfs (existing site conditions) to 59.2 cfs peak discharge rate during the 25-year 24- hour storm event. This assumes that the runoff from the existing development is directed towards the existing detention pond and that storm water runoff from the expansion is not contained within a detention pond but introduced directly to the stream. It was calculated that the existing wet pond expanded to a bottom area of 7,713 square feet, side slope of 3:1, total depth of 8 feet, a desired stage of 48 inches and a 24" orifice could adequately contain 102,909 cubic feet of flood water and effectively reduce the peak flow to 22.7 cfs during a high rainfall event. Effectively the post construction peak inflow hydrograph of 59.2 cfs is dampened to 22.7 cfs with additional storage capacity in the existing wet pond. This represents a 20% reduction in pre -development and post -development, 28.7 cfs to 22.7 cfs, peak flow conditions. A riser pipe of 24" diameter and 4.0 feet high will serve as the principle spillway for the basin. Since it is desired to maintain water in the pond at all times, no dewatering hole is specified at the base of the riser, as would typically be done in storm water retention basins. Therefore, no outflow from the pond would occur until the water surface rose above the top of the riser pipe. The proposed volume/elevation relationship is included in the attachment page 12. Since the maximum water surface elevation attained in the pond during the design storm is 164.49 feet, this should serve as the maximum pond elevation prior to outflow through an emergency spillway. The emergency spillway should be designed by the project engineer. At the maximum design water surface elevation (-164.5 ft), a pond storage capacity of approximately 103,000 cubic feet is specified. It should be noted that as the water surface in the pond initially rises above the top of the 4' vertical riser pipe, the riser performs as a circular weir. At greater depths, control of flow is shifted to the conduit pipe conveying the water. Ms. Debra A. Bell January 21, 1999 IPage 3 The result of the proposed storm water retention structure at the IDX site is a reduction to 22.7 cfs of the peak discharge from the site. For the North Brook Watershed as a whole, the peak discharge is decreased from its existing level (122.0 cfs existing, 120.1 cfs proposed, with additional retention). Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Dori Barton Staff Scientist Attachments cc: Mr. Ray Belair, City Planner Mr. John Caulo, Kessel/Duff \\HN_SERVER\USERS\DSARTON\I➢X\I DX.'RFI'2.DOC SITE LOCATION MAP: IDX EXPANSION h 1:20250 I N F O R M A T I O N A I VI S U A L I Z A T I O N _ SFRV I F.S �.6.e..1. .viirq[en. -ere oene��p.T�l:..91M4.� Fet: AD1).e.-t01� a IDX Expansion South Burlington, Vermont Stormwater Modelling PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS' Curve Number Calculation IDX Site Area: 14.22 acres Upslope Area: 10.83 + 2.46 = 13.3 acres Upslope Area Condition Soil Group Area (acres) CN %CN Pasture A 10 49 36.84 Pasture D 3.31 84 20.91 Total CN 57.75 IDX Site Condition Soil Group Area (acres) CN %CN Pasture/Range A 0.94 49 3.24 Fair Woods C 1.03 75 5.43 Blgs/Paved D 6.24 98 43 Open Space D 5.97 80 33.59 Total CN 85.26 Notes: ' = based on information collected for 1986 IDX expansion: Heindel and Noyes Report # 598 $ POSTDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Curve Number Calculation IDX Site Area: 16.68 acres North Drainage: 7.79 acres South Drainage: 8.89 acres Upslope Area: 10.83 acres Upslope Area Condition Soil Group Area (acres) CN %CN Pasture A 10 49 45.24 Pasture D 0.83 84 6.44 Total CN 51.68 IDX Site: North Drainage Condition Soil Group Area (acres) CN %CN Open Space/Lawn A 1.91 39 9.56 Open Space/Lawn D 1.62 80 16.64 Open Space/Lawn C 0.25 74 2.37 Blgs/Paved A 3.02 98 38 Bigs/Paved D 0.74 98 9.31 Blgs/Paved C 0.25 98 3.15 Total CN 79.03 IDX Site: South Drainage Condition Soil Group Area (acres) CN %CN Open Space/Lawn A 0.33 39 1.45 Open Space/Lawn D 0.89 80 8.01 Blgs/Paved A 3.45 98 38.03 Blgs/Paved D 4.22 98 46.52 Total CN 94.01 U ADBARTON\IDX\Appendices.wb3 ,3 IDX Expansion South Burlington, Vermont Stormwater Modelling Pond Storage Calculations Pond 1 (as designed for 1986 expansion) Depth ft Area s .ft Incremental Stora a cu.ft) Total Storage cu.ft) 160 2124 0 0 161 2642 2383 2383 162 3217 2930 5313 163 3848 3533 8846 164 4536 4192 13,038 164.4 4902 2360 15,398 165 5281 2546 17,944 166 6082 3147 26,773 167 6940 3361 30,134 Assume a square basin, side slopes 1:3 Pond 1 (Expanded for 1999) Depth ft Area s .ft Incremental Stora a cu.ft) Total Storage cu.ft 158 7713 0 0 160 12249 19962 19962 162 17298 29547 49509 164 22824 40122 89,631 166 31590 54414 144,045 Assume a square basin, side slopes 1:3, max. elevation 164.49ft, 4 ft riser. 8 ft depth Required storage: 102,909 cuft for peak flow of 22.74 cfs 1 U:\DBARTON\IDX\Appendices.wb3 Aydrograph Summary Report 0,. Page 1 IHyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cult) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 19.8 2 720 51,349 25 - - RO#1 2 SCS Runoff 51.8 2 716 109,278 25 - - Goss Dodge 13 SCS Runoff 23.5 2 718 56,584 25 - - Magic Hat 4 Combine 68.6 2 718 160,627 25 1 + 2 - - 15 Combine 92.1 2 718 217,211 25 4 + 3 - - 6 Reach 40.2 2 726 217.195 25 5 - NJ: Wetlands j7 Reservoir 39.8 2 728 217,195 25 6 131.00 1,890 Pond 241NJ 8 Reach 40.1 2 730 217,193 25 7 - Reach NE 19 SCS Runoff 9.9 2 716 21,219 25 - Magic Hat 10 Combine 41.4 2 730 238,412 25 8 + 9 Reach NF 11 SCS Runoff 2.1 2 730 16,093 25 - - - upslope 112 SCS Runoff 32.1 2 718 64,346 25 - IDX 13 Combine 32.6 2 718 80,439 25 11 + 12 IDX combinc ro 114 Reservoir 28.3 2 720 80,439 25 13 163.79 12,162 Upper lDX r`Y:s 15 SCS Runoff 6.7 2 724 21,048 25 - N-IV 116 SCS Runoff 22.4 2 734 102,600 25 - N-I 17 Combine 27.2 2 732 123,647 25 15 + 16 - 118 SCS Runoff 8.2 2 716 16,728 25 - N-III 19 Combine 28.2 2 732 140,376 25 17 + 18 - NI,III,NIV 120 SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 Heritage 21 SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - Heritage-B 22 Combine 49.0 2 718 120,675 25 20 + 21 - Heritage Combined 123 SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - - Heritage-C 24 Reach 28.4 2 722 80,428 25 14 RT.7 125 Combine 72.0 2 718 261,050 25 22 + 19 Heritage 26 Combine 96.5 2 718 321,388 25 23 + 25 Heritage (27 Combine 123.3 2 720 401,816 25 24 + 26 - 28 SCS Runoff 31.8 2 720 82,467 25 - Jeep I29 Combine 155.1 2 720 484,283 25 27 + 28 Jeep 30 Reach 157.4 2 720 484,286 25 29 NK Reach 158.7 2 722 484,285 25 30 NG r31 PrOj. file: nbpreidx.GPW IDF file: bbidf.IDF --T Run date: 01-05-1999 ,,-\--�C"ieA,Pr", ` C-c- C" -Vp,S .Hydrograph Summary Report Page 2 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cult) Hydrograph description 32 Combine 197.6 2 722 722,697 25 10 + 31 RR culvert Reservoir 197.5 2 722 722,697 25 32 120.27 178 RR tracks 133 34 Reservoir 195.5 2 722 722,697 25 33 126.33 4,622 NE 35 Reservoir 165.8 2 728 722,697 25 34 128.07 33,652 ND I36 Reservoir 163.9 2 730 722,696 25 35 120.06 5,312 NC 37 Reservoir 121.4 2 738 722,697 25 36 125.15 72,951 NB 138 i i I II Reach 121.5 2 740 722,675 25 37 Reach NA `1k Proj. file: nbpreidx.GPW OF file: bbidfADF Run date: 01-05-1999 lr, ,:41-4,skd Hydrograph Summary Report Page 1 H No 1 2 3 4 5 IftAIIIIII 7 8 c 10 1 �. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description SCS Runoff 19.8 2 720 51.349 25 - RO#1 SCS Runoff 51.8 2 716 109,278 25 - Goss Dodge SCS Runoff 23.5 2 718 56.584 25 - Magic Hat Combine 68.6 2 718 160,627 25 1 + 2 Combine 92.1 2 718 217,211 25 4 + 3 - Reach 40.2 2 726 217,195 25 5 - NJ: Wetlands Reservoir 39.8 2 728 217.195 25 - 6 131.00 1.890 Pond 24/NJ Reach 40.1 2 730 217,193 25 7 Reach NE pSCS Runoff 9.9 2 716 21.219 25 - Magic Hat Combine 41.4 2 730 238,412 25 8 + 9 Reach NF SCS Runoff 1.7 2 740 15,610 25 - upslope SCS Runoff 22.1 2 720 57,258 25 - IDX/Old Dev Combine 22.5 2 722 72,868 25 11 + 12 Old IDX Dev & upsl Reservoir 20.8 2 724 72,868 25 13 163.45 10,727 IDX Old Pond SCS Runoff 45.7 2 716 100.575 25 - IDX NEW Combine 59.2 2 718 173,443 25 14 + 15 Old IDX & NEW IDX SCS Runoff 6.7 2 724 21,048 25 - - N-IV SCS Runoff 22.4 2 734 102,6W 25 - N-I Combine 27.2 2 732 123.647 25 17 + 18 - SCS Runoff 8.2 2 716 16,728 25 - N-111 Combine 28.2 2 732 140,376 25 19 + 20 NI,III,NIV SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - Heritage SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - Heritage-B Combine 49.0 2 718 120.675 25 22 + 23 - Heritage Combined SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - - - Heritage-C Reach 60.6 2 718 173,433 25 16 RT.7 Combine 72.0 2 718 261,050 25 24 + 21 Heritage Combine 96.5 2 718 321,388 25 25 + 27 - Heritage i Combine 157.1 2 718 494.821 25 26 + 28 - SCS Runoff 31.8 2 720 82.467 25 - Jeep Combine 186.6 2 718 577.288 25 29 + 30 - Jee roj. file: nbpostidxnopond.GP OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 12-17-1998 h�drograph Summary Report Page 2 �i. Hydrograph Peak Time Time to Volume Return Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph type now interval peak period hyd(s) elevation storage description (origin) (cfs) (min) (min) (cuft) (yrs) (ft) (cuft) i Reach 192.1 2 720 577,290 25 31 NK Reach 193.1 2 722 5T7,290 25 32 NG Combine 232.0 2 722 815.702 25 10 + 33 RR culvert Reservoir 232.2 2 722 815,702 25 34 120.30 198 RR tracks Reservoir 230.2 2 722 815,703 25 35 126.67 5,397 NE Reservoir 0.0 2 0 0 25 36 0.00 0 ND Reservoir 39.6 2 768 789.484 25 37 116.79 632 NC i Reservoir 39.6 2 768 788,913 25 38 119.91 14,382 NB Reach 40.6 2 766 788.893 25 39 Reach NA 'roj. file: nbpostidxnopond.GP IDF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 12-17-1998 I Aydrograph Summary Report Page 1 yd. o, Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuff) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ff) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description h SCS Runoff 19.8 2 720 51,349 25 - RO#1 2 SCS Runoff 51.8 2 716 109,278 25 - Goss Dodge SCS Runoff 23.5 2 718 56,584 25 - Magic Hat 4 Combine 68.6 2 718 160,627 25 1 + 2 - Combine 92.1 2 718 217,211 25 4 + 3 - 6 Reach 40.2 2 726 217,195 25 5 NJ: Wetlands p Reservoir 39.8 2 728 217,195 25 6 131.00 1,890 Pond 24/NJ 8 Reach 40.1 2 730 217,193 25 7 Reach NE SCS Runoff 9.9 2 716 21,219 25 - Magic Hat �0 Combine 41.4 2 730 238,412 25 8 + 9 Reach NF 11 SCS Runoff 1.7 2 740 15,610 25 - upslope 12 SCS Runoff 22.1 2 720 57,258 25 - IDX/Old Dev 13 Combine 22.5 2 722 72,868 25 11 + 12 Old IDX Dev & upsl 114 SCS Runoff 45.7 2 716 100,575 25 - IDX NEW 15 Combine 64.4 2 718 173,443 25 13 + 14 Old Pond & New IDX 06 Reservoir 19.4 2 728 173,419 25 15 164.77 110,520 NewIDXPond 17 SCS Runoff 6.7 2 724 21,048 25 - N-IV 18 SCS Runoff 22.4 2 734 102,600 25 - - - N-1 19 Combine 27.2 2 732 123,647 25 17 + 18 -- NBIV & NBI SCS Runoff 8.2 2 716 16,728 25 - - N-III 21 Combine 28.2 2 732 140,376 25 19 + 20 - NI,III,NIV SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 Heritage SCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 _ Heritage-B 24 Combine 49.0 2 718 120,675 25 22 + 23 Heritage Combined kSCS Runoff 24.5 2 718 60,337 25 - Heritage-C 26 Reach 19.5 2 730 173,333 25 16 -- RT.7 �7 Combine 72.0 2 718 261,050 25 24 + 21 Heritage 28 Combine 96.5 2 718 321,388 25 25 + 27 Heritage rCombine 110.3 2 720 494,721 25 26 + 28 Heritage & IDX 30 SCS Runoff 31.8 2 720 82,467 25 - Jeep Combine 142.1 2 720 577,188 25 29+30 Jee �_roj. file: nbidxpostexpans.GP OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-20-1999 Aydrograph Summary Report Page 2 �yd. o. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuff) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 2 Reach 144.0 2 720 577,221 25 31 NK 33 Reach 145.0 2 722 577.230 25 32 NG �4 Combine 183.8 2 722 815,641 25 10 + 33 RR culvert 35 Reservoir 183.9 2 722 815,643 25 34 120.26 169 RR tracks Reservoir 184.6 2 722 815,643 25 35 126.23 4,415 NE I 37 Reservoir 159.2 2 728 815,642 25 36 127.69 30,217 ND rReservoir 157.8 2 730 815,642 25 37 119.83 4,644 NC 39 Reservoir 119.8 2 740 815,641 25 38 124.98 70,054 NB �10 f I I Reach 120.1 2 740 815,617 25 39 Reach NA `Proj. file: nbidxpostexpans.GP OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-20-1999 to Aydrograph Summary Report Page I �iyd. o, Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description y SCS Runoff 2.1 2 730 16,093 25 — Upslope 2 SCS Runoff 32.1 2 718 64,346 25 — — IDX 3 Combine 32.6 2 718 80,439 25 1 + 2 Upslope & IDX 4 Reservoir 28.3 2 720 80,439 25 3 163.79 12,162 IDX Pond Proj. file: IDXpre.GPW OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-05-1999 Ox Co�.�:o�S Page 1 t� l ydrograph Summary Report �yd. Hydrograph rio. type (origin) 1 SCS Runoff SCS Runoff Combine Reservoir SCS Runoff Combine Proj. file: idx Time Time to Volume Return Inflow Maximum Maximum Hydrograph Peak flow interval peak period hyd(s) elevation storage description (cfs) (min) (min) (cuff) (yrs) (ft) (cuft) 1.7 2 740 15,610 25 — — — upslope 22.1 2 720 57,258 25 — IDX Old 22.5 2 722 72,868 25 2 + 1 upslope & Old IDX 20.8 2 724 72,868 25 3 163.45 10,727 old IOX Pond 45.7 2 716 100,575 25 — — — IDX New 59.2 2 718 173,443 25 4 + 5 — Old IDX & New IDX d f OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 12-17-1998 ___ ' )ostnopond.GPW F .Hydrograph Summary Report Page 9 �Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak now (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuft) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 1.7 2 740 15,610 25 — upslope 2 SCS Runoff 22.1 2 720 57.258 25 — — IDX Old i3 Combine 22.5 2 722 72,868 25 1 + 2 IDX Old & Upslope 4 SCS Runoff 45.7 2 716 100,575 25 — IDX New 15 Combine 64.4 2 718 173,443 25 3 + 4 — Old Dev & New IDX 6 I I Reservoir 22.7 2 728 173,439 25 5 164.49 102,909 New IDX Pond Proj. file: idxpost7.GPW OF file: bbidf.IDF TRUn date: 01-20-1999 Aydrograph Summary Report )3 Page 1 IHyd. lNo. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak now (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cuff) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 7.1 2 722 18,756 2 - RO#1 2 SCS Runoff 23.3 2 716 47,405 2 - Goss Dodge 3 SCS Runoff 11.1 2 718 25,730 2 - - Magic Hat 4 Combine 29.4 2 718 66,161 2 1+ 2 - 5 1 Combine 40.5 2 718 91,891 2 4 + 3 - 6 Reach 16.8 2 726 91,876 2 5 NJ: Wetlands �7 Reservoir 16.8 2 726 91,876 2 6 128.73 486 Pond 24/NJ 8 Reach 16.8 2 728 91,874 2 7 Reach NE 19 SCS Runoff 4.7 2 716 9,649 2 - - - Magic Hat 10 Combine 17.6 2 726 101,523 2 8 + 9 Reach NF 11 SCS Runoff 0.0 2 1440 431 2 - upslope 112 SCS Runoff 6.9 2 722 18,760 2 - - IDX/Old Dev 13 Combine 6.9 2 722 19,191 2 11 + 12 Old IDX Dev & upsl 114 SCS Runoff 22.8 2 716 47,933 2 - IDX NEW 15 Combine 28.1 2 718 67,123 2 13 + 14 Old Pond & New IDX (16 Reservoir 6.3 2 730 67,108 2 15 163.37 76,913 NewlDXPond 17 SCS Runoff 1.9 2 726 6,500 2 - N-IV 18 SCS Runoff 3.9 2 736 25,236 2 - N-1 19 Combine 5.2 2 734 31,737 2 17 + 18 NBIV & NBI 120 SCS Runoff 3.2 2 718 6,429 2 - - - N-111 21 Combine 5.6 2 734 38,166 2 19 + 20 - - NI,III,NIV SCS Runoff 12.2 2 718 211,756 2 - Heritage 122 23 SCS Runoff 12.2 2 718 28.756 2 - Heritage-B 24 Combine 24.4 2 718 57,512 2 22 + 23 Heritage Combined 125 SCS Runoff 12.2 2 718 28,756 2 - - - Heritage-C 26 Reach 6.3 2 732 67,000 2 16 - RT.7 27 Combine 29.7 2 718 95,677 2 24 + 21 Heritage 28 Combine 41.9 2 718 124,433 2 25 + 27 Heritage j 29 130 Combine 45.1 2 718 191,434 2 26 + 28 Heritage & IDX SCS Runoff 11.1 2 722 29,343 2 - Jeep 31 Combine 56.1 2 720 220,777 2 29 + 30 Jeep Proj. file: nbidxpostexpans.GP OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-21-1999 cw-,*V, e,Vo-, a.,. r.1� _�ydrograph Summary Report Page 2 �Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak now (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description 132 Reach 57.0 2 720 220,799 2 31 NK 33 Reach 56.8 2 722 220,797 2 32 — NG 134 Combine 73.5 2 722 322,320 2 10 + 33 RR culvert 35 Reservoir 73.5 2 722 322.320 2 34 120.14 91 RR tracks 36 Reservoir 73.2 2 724 322,321 2 35 123.88 1,020 NE 37 Reservoir 68.1 2 726 322,320 2 36 123.73 7,973 ND I38 Reservoir 68.1 2 726 322,320 2 37 117.44 1,074 NC 39 Reservoir 63.8 2 730 322,320 2 38 120.34 17,361 NB 40 Reach 64.2 2 730 322,290 2 39 Reach NA Proj. file: nbidxpostexpans.GP OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-21-1999 .Nydrograph Summary Report Page 1 �iyd. ifJo, Hydrograph type (origin) Peak now (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Volume (cult) Return period (yrs) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Maximum storage (cuft) Hydrograph description J '1 SCS Runoif 0.0 2 1440 431 2 — upslope 2 SCS Runoff 6.9 2 722 18,760 2 — — IDX Old �3 Combine 6.9 2 722 19,191 2 1 + 2 IDX Old & Upslope 4 SCS Runoff 22.8 2 716 47,933 2 — IDX New '5 Combine 28.1 2 718 67,123 2 3 + 4 Old Dev & New IDX 6 Reservoir 9.5 2 726 67,121 2 5 163.21 73,766 New IDX Pond i Proj. file: idxpost7.GPW OF file: bbidf.IDF Run date: 01-20-1999 � COX S,-��- '. �oS-�- ��..� ay.� S�-•,-- `�.�.��;�,... UPSLOPE Q AREA: 13.31 acres AREA: 15 acres CN: 57.75 CN: 85.1 PEAK FLOW: 2.10 cfs PEAK FLOW: 32.1 cfs PEAK FLOW: 32.6 cfs IDX WETPOND STORAGE VOL.: 30,134 ft3 PEAK FLOW: 28.3 cfs CULVER ROUTE 7 PEAK FLOW: 155.1 cfs RAILROAD CULVERT PEAK FI ^"' 197.6 cfs LEGEND RUNOFF AREA O POND 0 CULVERT BASE OF WATERSHED PEAK FLOW: 121.5 cfs IDX/STORMWATER DATE: JANUARY 21, 1999 BOJECT NO. 98194 SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT DRAl1NY.• ` BM. 4vmom BRGJ, VGR: S. 'i STc+,45. EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE —DEVELOPMENT) 1AFPROVED: 9. 72ou4& SCALE: SCHEMATIC FILE: C:\IDX\FLOWCHRT ' ❑ DRAFT FINAL Heindel and Noyes • HyCrogeology • Ecology • • Environmentol Engineering • �' rnNe Ii 11SJ�= �`! NTCn eu MrlNeewc P.O. BOX 64709 - BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05406-4709 Prepared 6'Y: Information & Vieualtzatior+ Serv+om UPSLOPE AREA: 10.83 acres CN: 51.68 PEAK FLOW: 1.7 cfs LEGEND RUNOFF AREA POND CULVERT IDX EXISTING AREA: 7.79 acres CN: 79.02 PEAK FLOW: 22.1 cfs PEAK FLOW: 64.4 cfs PEAK FLOW: 22.7 cfs CULVERT ROUTE 7 PEAK FLOW: 142.1 cfs RAILROAD CULVERT PEAK FLOW: 183.8 cfs BASE OF WATERSHED PEAK FLOW: 120.1 cfs IDX/STORMWATER DATE: JANUARY 21, 1999 PliQJECT N0. 98194 SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT DRAIIN BY. M. 4omam PROD. MGR: ,S. emiia,n EXPANSION CONDITIONS WITH EXPANDED WETPOND (POST -DEVELOPMENT) APPROVED: SCALE: SCHEMATIC FILE: C:\IDX\FLOWCHRT —t-5 DRAFT FINAL IDX EXPANSION AREA: 8.89 acres CN: 94.01 PEAK FLOW: 45.7 cfs Heindel and Noyes e Hroa Ecology e • Envivironmentalmental Engineering • MNci� TSIL= cry NTiCfC un cNhNFFR< P.O. BOX 64709 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05406-4709 Prepared By: Info,7nacwe, 8 Vbualhadon Serv+oea Revised Trafc Impact Study for.- IDX Expansion South Burlington, Vermont Preparedfor: IDX Systems Corporation 21 January 1999 RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. White River junction, Vermont TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................1 2. STUDY AREA....................................................................................................2 3. EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS................................................4 3.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................ 4 4. TRAFFIC FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT................................................5 4.1 TRIP GENERATION..............................................................................................5 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION.............................................................................................7 5. CONGESTION ANALYSIS................................................................................7 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION...........................................................................7 5.2 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS............................................................................. 8 6. DISCUSSION.....................................................................................................13 US 7/HOME AVENUE TO US 7/MACINTOSH AVENUE/FAYETTE DRIVE ............................ 15 US 7/IMPERIAL DRIVE............................................................................................ 16 US 7/HOLMES ROAD/IDX DRIVE................................................................................ 16 US 7/BARTLETT BAY ROAD/GREEN MOUNTAIN ROAD .................................................. 17 US 7/ALLEN ROAD.................................................................................................. 17 US 7/PINE HAVEN SHORE/LOCUST HILL DRIVE........................................................... 17 US 7/BAY ROAD/EXECUTIVE DRIVE........................................................................... 17 7. SAFETY ANALYSIS........................................................................................18 8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN..................................18 9. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS................................................19 1. INTRODUCTION t A medical software firm, IDX Systems Corporation, proposes to expand its facilities in South JI Burlington, Vermont. The existing buildings on the property have 144,000 square feet of space, occupied by approximately 573 full-time employees. The proposed expansion would add a 240,000 square -foot building and demolish an existing 20,000 square -foot building. Additionally, a parking garage with 600 parking spaces would be added to the property. There would be an added work force at the IDX Drive building of more than 1,200 new and relocated employees. The IDX property abuts US 7 (Shelburne Road) in South Burlington (Figure 1). Almost all of the vehicles enter and exit the property through the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection with US 7. This report focuses on the effects this proposed expansion would have on congestion and safety along US 7. This study includes the results from the following activities: A Conducting a week-long automatic traffic count at IDX to aid in estimating future trip generation; A Estimating distribution of traffic from the IDX expansion along US 7, using a transportation network model developed by Resource Systems Group for the Chittenden County Municipal Planning Organization; JA Forecasting traffic volumes along US 7 using Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) data; A Analyzing levels of service along US 7 under no -build and build scenarios for the years 2000 and 2005 (the estimated build -out year and 5 years beyond), and; A Recommending mitigation and improvement strategies to improve overall congestion and safety. This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the Highway Capacity Manuall the Trip Generation Manual,2 Tra�c Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide,3 and the Vermont State Design Standards.4 1 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual.• Special Report 209, Washington DC, 1994. 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Washington DC, 1997. t3 VAOT, Planning & Traffic Research Division, Traffic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide, 1992. J4 VAOT, Vermont State Standards for Design of Transportation Construction, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation on Freeways, Roads, and Streets, July 1997. J �� IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 2. STUDY AREA Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 Vermont Agency of Transportation guidelines require the analysis of all intersections that receive 75 or more vehicle trips from the project during the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. We made an analysis to determine this scope by using the regional transportation network model for Chittenden County. With the model, we observed how the new IDX trips were distributed along Shelburne Road to the north and to the south of the IDX property. We then calculated the percentage of trips passing through individual intersections. Intersections with more than 75 trips passing through were chosen to be analyzed in this study. These intersections are shown in Figure 1 and listed in Table 1. 1 I 1 J 1 1 1 IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Figure 1: Local Road Network, Shelburne Road and Study Intersections TO BURLINGTON NN Home Ave O'Dell Drive , ` NOT TO SCALE Sears Outlet 1-189 Ramp C 1189 Ramp A Swill Street Queen City Park Rd Brewer Parkway R —19 Laurel Hill Drive Baldwin Ave Mcintosh Ave Holmes Road IDX Drive Extension t IDX Property Bartlett Bay Rd Green Mtn Dr. Allen Road Pine Haven Shore 1 Locust Hill Road 'O R d c 3 GI t N Executive Drive oa �o OJ 0 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 3 IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 3. EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 4 Traffic data for many of the signalized intersections along US 7 have been collected by VAM'. 'Fable 1 shows the intersections included in this study and the date of the count. These counts were adjusted to reflect the average ANI peak hour volume and the PM design hour volume, using V.AOT Continuous Traffic Counting (CTC) Station D002, on US 7 in Shelburne. All intersection turning movement volumes have been adjusted to represent the projected 1998, 2000, 2005 ANI peak and PM design hour volumes. Table 1: Study Intersections for Shelburne Road INTERSECTION WITH US 7, SHELBURNE ROAD COUNT DATE SOURCE US 7/Home Avenue/O'Dell Drive 6/14/98 VAOT US 7/Shelburne Road Plaza/Outlet Center 6/14/98 VAOT US 7/1-189 Ramp C 7/3/96 VAOT US 7/Swift Street 3/20/98 VAOT US 7/Queen City Park Road 4/26/96 VAOT US 7/13rewer Parkway 7/6/95 VAOT US 7/1-aurel Hill Drive/Hannafords Dr. 3/5/98 VAOT US 7/Baldwin Avenue 2/18/98 VAOT US 7/McIntosh Avenue 1/20/99 RSG US 7/Holmes Road Ext./IDX Drive 9/29/98 RSG US 7/Allen Road 4/2/98 VAOT US 7/Pine Haven Shore/Locust Hill Rd. 1/20/99 RSG US 7/Bay Road/Executive Drive 6/29/95 VAOT IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 5 4. TRAFFIC FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 4.1 TRIP GENERATION It is important to understand the trip generation characteristics of the IDX property to be able to accurately estimate the likely trips generated by new employees. RSG placed automatic traffic I recorders at all entrances to IDX. The automatic traffic recorders documented vehicles entering and exiting IDX continuously from 2 November to 9 November 1998. Figure 2 shows the number of vehicles entering and exiting IDX driveways during the week.5 Figure 2: Total Vehicle Trips for IDX, Measured by Day of Week I 2000 1600 0 a 1200 0 d 800 t d !11 0 MON TUE FRI SAT SUN 1 There is a significant difference between the weekday and weekend trips to and from IDX. For this reason, we have limited the trip generation estimates and the capacity analyses to the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Figure 3 shows the average trips for the study week, separated into inbound and outbound vehicle trips. The peak hours of traffic at IDX are during the 8 to 9 am and the 5 to 6 pm hours. The averages of these data represent the trip generation rates we used for this study (Table 2). 5 Note: Volumes for Monday were estimated by using the data from 11/2 and 11/9, and weekly averages where data were missing. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 6 Figure 3: Average Weekday Vehicle Trips, Inbound and Outbound Trips 300 --..__..... —Inbound Vehicles 250 Outbound Vehicles z o zoo U 150 100 /► 50 `1 0 Q ¢ a a a ¢ a a a a a c- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Figure 4: Direct Comparison of Peak Hours WED THU E3AM PEAK ■PM PEAK FRI IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 7 By 2000, IDX plans to add 136 employees to its facility at IDX. IDX plans add an estimated 1,202 employees by 2005, amounting to a total employment of 1,775. Trip generation rates are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Rates at IDX PERCENT PERCEN' TRIP GENERATION NEW TRIPS BY NEW TRIPS BY OF TRIPS OF TRIP; iCENARIO RATE (per employee) 2000 2005 IN OU' kM Peak Hour 0.52 70 623 93% 70G 'M Peak Hour 0.42 57 508 5% 950/ 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION By following the general trends of historic turning movements, and extrapolating the number of trips to follow certain routes from the regional demand model, we estimated the distribution of these new trips in 2000 and 2005. We also estimated that some new northbound trips would use the planned connection between IDX parking lots and Green Mountain Drive. This assumption shifts approximately 60% of the northbound traffic to the Shelburne Road/Green Mountain Drive intersection, while the rest of the northbound traffic (401/6) will pass through the intersection and use IDX Drive. These ratios apply for exiting traffic also. 5. CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION Level -of -Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. The Highway Capacity Manual defines six grades to describe the LOS at an intersection. LOS is based on the stopped delay per vehicle.6 Table 7 shows the various LOS grades, qualitative descriptions, and quantitative definitions for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections. 6 Highway Capacity Manual, p. 9-6. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 8 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED LOS CHARACTERSTICS STOPPED DELAY (sec) TOTAL DELAY (sec) A Little or no delay <_ 5.0 <_ 5.0 B Short delays 5.1-15.0 5.1-10.0 C Average delays 15.1-25.0 10.1-20.0 D Long delays 25.1-40.0 20.1-30.0 E Very long delays 40.1-60.0 30.1-45.0 F Extreme delays 60.0 < 45.0 < 5.2 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS Table 4 through Table 6 summarize the level of service results for all scenarios. The levels of service (LOS) are listed by approach, and the overall intersection LOS is written in italics. A typical listing is, "14.8 B." The number, 14.8, is the stopped delay per vehicle (in seconds). The letter B is the level of service, as described in Table 3. JTable 4 illustrates the analysis results for the 1998 AM and PM no -build peak periods and the 2000 AM and PM peak periods for no -build and build scenarios. The 2000 Build scenarios include 136 additional employees. Table 5 summarizes the 2005 AM and PM peak periods for no -build and build scenarios. 2005 Build scenarios include the full build -out, with 1,202 additional employees. Table 6 lists LOS analysis results at intersections affected by the VAOT Shelburne Road improvement project. The planned Shelburne Road improvements will be for intersections between Imperial Drive and Bay Road. The analysis scenarios will be for the 2005 AM and PM peak periods, including no -build and build conditions. The roadway will have two through lanes in the northbound and southbound directions. Exclusive left turn lanes will also be installed on the Shelburne Road approaches at these intersections. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 4: Level of Service Results, 1998 and 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 9 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 1998 NO BUILD 2000 AM 2000 PM AM PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOME AVE HOME AVE, EB 14.8 B 21.8 C 14.8 B 14.8 B 22.1 C 22.1 C BACON COURT, WB 14.4 B 18.7 C 14.4 B 14.4 B 18.7 C 18.7 C US7,NB 13.7E 13.6B 13.9E 14B 14.2B 14.4B US7,SB 10.7B 9.3B 10.8B 10.9B 9.3B 9.4B OVERALL INTERSECTION 12.9 B 13.3 B 13.1 B 13.1 B 13.6 B 13.8 B US 7/SHELBURNE RD SHELBURNE RD PLAZA, EB 17.8 C 19.1 C 17.8 C 17.8 C 19.1 C 19.1 C PLAZA OUTLET CENTER DRIVE, WB 17.9 C 19 C 17.9 C 17.9 C 19.1 C 19.1 C US7,NB 7.3B 8.4B 7.4B 7.5B 9.1B 9.4B US7,SB 6.9B 8.5B 6.9B 7B 8.6B 8.6B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.5 B 8.6 B 7.6 B 7.7 B 9.18 9.3 B US 7/1-189 RAMP C 1-189 RAMP C, WB 10.2 B 12.6 B 10.3 B 10.4 B 12.7 B 12.7 B US7,NB 7.5B 9.7B 7.5B 7.5B 9.7B 9.8B US7,SIB 7.4B 11.7B 7.4B 7.5B 11.9B 11.9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.5 B 11.5 B 8.6 B 8.7 B 11.6 B 11.6 B US 7/SWIFT STREET SWIFT STREET, WB 15.3 C 18.4 C 15.4 C 15.6 C 18.6 C 18.6 C US7,NB 7.6B 12.6B 7.7B 7.7B 13.3B 13.9B US7,SB 1.4A 2.8A 1.5A 1.5A 3A 3A OVERALL INTERSECTION 5.7 B 9.1 B 5.8 B 5.8 B 9.5 B 9.8 B US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK QUEEN CITY PARK, EB 16.4 C 27.3 D 16.4 C 16.4 C 28 D 28 D US7,NB 1.9A 3.9A 1.9A 1.9A 4.5A 5.1B US7,SB 1.9A 2.1A 1.9A 2A 2.2A 2.2A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3 A 5.5 B 3 A 3 A 5.9 B 6.2 B US 7/BREWER PARKWAY BREWER PARKWAY, EB 12.6 B 22.3 C 12.7 B 12.7 B 22.8 C 22.8 C BREWER PARKWAY, WB 20 C 23.8 C 20 C 20 C 23.9 C 23.9 C US7,NB 5.7B 11.4E 5.8B 5.8B 12.4B 13.4B US7,SB 6.5B 6.98 6.7B 7B 7.1 B 7.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 6.6 B 10.7 B 6.8 B 7 B 11.4 B 11.9 B US 7/LAUREL HILL DRIVE HANNAFORDS, EB 18.1 C 28 D 18.2 C 18.2 C 29.6 D 29.6 D LAUREL HILL, WB 21.6 C 21.2 C 21.8 C 21.7 C 21.2 C 21.2 C US7,NB 5.8B 10.6B 5.8B 5.8B 11.3B 12.1B US7,SB 6B 7.3B 6.2B 6.5B 7.5B 7.6B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.2 B 11 B 7.3 B 7.5 B 11.5 B 11.9 B IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 4: Level of Service Results, 1998 and 2000 (Continued) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 10 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 1998 NO BUILD 2000 AM 2000 PM AM PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/BALDWIN AVE. DRIVEWAY, EB 18.4 C 19.4 C 18.4 C 18.4 C 19.5 C 19.5 C BALDWIN AVE, WB 20.9 C 19.8 C 21 C 21 C 19.8 C 19.8 C US7,NB 0.2A 1.2A 0.2A 0.2A 1.3A 1.4A US7,SB 0.2A to 0.2A 0.2A 1A to OVERALL INTERSECTION 1.2 A 1.8 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.8 A 1.9 A US 7/MACINTOSH AVE FAYETTE DRIVE, EB 15.3 C 19.6 C 15.3 C 15.3 C 19.7 C 19.7 C MACINTOSH AVE, WB 14.8 B 18.7 C 14.8 B 14.8 B 18.7 C 18.7 C US7,NB 2.2A 2.3A 2.2A 2.3A 2.4A 2.6A US7,SB 12.2B 10.8B 12.8B 14.1B 11.4B 11.4B OVERALL INTERSECTION 8 B 7 B 8.3 B 9.1 B 7.4 B 74 B US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 18.7 C 19.8 C 18.7 C 20 C 27 D 27.4 D IDX DRIVE, WB 18.5 C 19.7 C 14.2 B 15.3 C 16.7 C 17.3 C US7,NB 4.5A 13.5B 4.5A 3.5A 8.1B 8.1B US7,SB 0.7A 1.9A 0.8A 0.9A 13B 20.9C OVERALL INTERSECTION 2.9 A 9.8 B 2.9 A 2.5 A 12.1 B 15.4 C US 7/13ARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 19.1 C 31.1 D 19.1 C 19.1 C 34.3 D 28.7 D GREEN MTN RD, WB 18.7C 21.6C 18.7C 18.7C 21.9C 21.3C US7,NB 5A 15.3C 5.1B 5.2B 17.5C 22.3C US7,SB 0.2A 2.5A 0.2A 0.2A 2.6A 3.3A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.4 A 11.2 B 3.5 A 3.5 A 12.4 B 14.3 B US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 23.8 C 23.5 C 24 C 25.5 D 23.8 C 23.8 C US7,NB 50E 11.8B 59.3E 53.4E 13.2B 13.2B US7,SB 1.8A 7.4B 1.9A 1.9A 9.2B 9.9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 31.1 D 11 B 36.5 D 33.3 D 12.4 B 12.8 B US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 18.6 C 24.1 C 18.6 C 18.6 C 24.1 C 24.1 C LOCUST HILL, WB 18.7 C 26.3 D 18.7 C 18.7 C 26.4 D 26.4 D US7,NB 1.4A 0.9A 1.6A 1.7A 1A 1A US7,SB 1.1A 28.5D 1.3A 1.3A 36.1D 41.4E OVERALL INTERSECTION 2 A 17.1 C 2.2 A 2.2 A 21.1 C 24 C US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 13.3 B 22 C 13.3 B 13.3 B 23 C 23 C EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 12.6 B 18.9 C 12.6 B 12.6 B 19.2 C 19.2 C US7,NB 4.5A 15.5C 4.6A 4.6A 17.4C 17.4C US7,SB 3.8A 12.8E 3.8A 3.8A 14.2E 14.7B OVERALL INTERSECTION 4.9 A 15 B 4.9 A 5 A 16.5 C 16.7 C IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 5: Level of Service Results, 2005 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 11 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOME AVE HOME AVE, EB 14.9 B 14.9 B 22.6 C 22.6 C BACON COURT, WB 14.4 B 14.4 B 18.8 C 18.8 C US7,NB 14.6E 14.7E 15.8C 18.8C US7,SB 10.9B 11.4E 9.5B 9.5B OVERALL INTERSECTION 13.5 B 13.6 B 14.7 B 16.6 C US 7/SHELBURNE RD SHELBURNE RD PLAZA, EB 17.8 C 17.8 C 19.1 C 19.1 C PLAZA OUTLET CENTER DRIVE, WB 17.9 C 18 C 19.1 C 19.1 C US7,NB 7.8B 7.9B 12B 19.1C US7,SB 7.1 B 7.6B 9B 9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.9 B 8.1 B 11.1 B 15.6 C US 7/1-189 RAMP C 1-189 RAMP C, WB 10.4 B 11.5 B 13.1 B 13.1 B US7,NB 7.6B 7.6B 9.9B 10.5E US7,SB 7.5B 7.8B 12.5B 12.6E OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.7 B 9.3 B 12 B 12.2 B US 7/SWIFT STREET SWIFT STREET, WB 15.8 C 17.9 C 19.4 C 22.4 C US7,NB 7.96 8B 16C 16C US7,SB 1.7A 2.1A 3.4A 4.1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 6 B 6.3 B 11 B 11.9 B US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK QUEEN CITY PARK, EB 16.5 C 16.9 C 23 C 30.1 D US7,NB 2.1A 2.1A 18.2C 39.7D US7,SB 2.1A 3.1A 5.4B 2.8A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.2 A 3.7 A 13.3 B 24.1 C US 7/BREWER PARKWAY BREWER PARKWAY, EB 12.7 B 13 B 25.1 D 30.6 D BREWER PARKWAY, WB 20.1 C 20.1 C 24.1 C 25.4 D US7,NB 6B 6B 16.3C 33D US7,SB 7.1 B 16.8C 7.7B 7.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.1 B 12.6 B 13.7 B 22.9 C US 7/LAUREL HILL DRIVE HANNAFORDS, EB 14.8 B 18.3 C 35.2 D 37.1 D LAUREL HILL, WB 18.4 C 21.9 C 21.3 C 16.1 C US7,NB 9.5B 6.3B 13.9B 37.1D US7,SB 10.8E 24.8C 8.1 B 8.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 10.8 B 17.7 C 13.4 B 24.3 C IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 5: Level of Service Results, 2005 (Continued) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 12 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/13ALDWIN AVE. DRIVEWAY, EB 18.4 C 18.4 C 19.5 C 19.5 C BALDWIN AVE, WB 21.3 C 21.7 C 19.9 C 19.9 C US7,NB 0.2A 0.2A 1.4A 2.7A US7,SB 0.2A 0.6A 1A 1.1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 1.2 A 1.4 A 1.9 A 2.6 A US 7/MACINTOSH AVE FAYETTE DRIVE, EB 15.4 C 19.5 C 19.8 C 20.5 C MACINTOSH AVE, WB 14.9 B 18.5 C 18.8 C 19.4 C US7,NB 2.4A 0.5A 2.9A 5.2B US7,SB 14.7B 14.1 B 13.5B 12.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 9.4 B 9.3 B 8.5 B 8.8 B US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 15 B 20.1 C 23 C 24.3 C IDX DRIVE, WB 14.9 B 9.3 B 15 B 37.1 D US7,NB 9B 46.7E 13.8B 19.4C US7,SB 7.1 B 52.5E 0.2A 0.6A OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.2 B 48.8 E 9 B 16.5 C US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 19.2 C 19.2 C 36.1 D 43.8 E GREEN MTN RD, WB 18.7 C 18.8 C 21.5 C 38.9 D US7,NB 5.5B 6.4B 36.7D 33.3D US7,SB 0.3A 0.4A 3.4A 3.2A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.7 A 4.3 A 20.8 C 21 C US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 36.1 D 40.3 E 24.9 C 25.3 D US7,NB 87F 119.5F 18.6C 12.9B US7,SB 1.8A 1.8A 16.8C 33.8D OVERALL INTERSECTION 53.2 E 72.9 F 18.4 C 25 C US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 18.6 C 18.6 C 24.2 C 24.2 C LOCUST HILL, WB 18.8 C 18.8 C 27 D 27 D US7,NB 2.4A 3.4A 1.4A 1.4A US7,SB 1.9A 2.3A 61 F 128.8F OVERALL INTERSECTION 2.8 A 3.5 A 34.6 D 72.4 F US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 13.3 B 13.4 B 33.7 D 33.7 D EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 12.6 B 12.6 B 21.7 C 21.7 C US7,NB 4.8A 5.2B 21C 21.3C US7,SB 3.8A 3.9A 16.5C 25.7D OVERALL INTERSECTION 5 A 5.3 B 19.9 C 24.1 C IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 6: Level of Service Results, 2005, with Shelburne Road Improvements Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 13 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 21.4 C 21.5 C 29.1 D 29.9 D IDX DRIVE, WB 10.1 B 9.4 B 11.9 B 18.8 C US 7, NB 21.1 C 21.1 C 20.6 C 20.6 C US7,SB 6.5B 22.8C 6.3B 10B OVERALL INTERSECTION 13.1 B 21.8 C 14.4 B 16.9 C US 7/13ARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 18.4 C 18.5 C 21.4 C 18.6 C GREEN MTN RD, WB 20 C 20.2 C 20.1 C 23.7 C US7,NB 4.7A 4.9A 13.5B 15.8C US7,SB 6.3B 6.3B 14.3E 20.8C OVERALL INTERSECTION 6.1 B 6.2 B 14.9 B 19 C US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 16.1 C 16.2 C 19.3 C 19.3 C US7,NB 4.1A 4.3A 9.9B 10B US7,SB 5A 5A 12.4B 13.3E OVERALL INTERSECTION 5.4 B 5.5 B 12.2 B 12.7 B US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 15.5 C 15.5 C 20.4 C 20.4 C LOCUST HILL, WB 15.7 C 15.7 C 21.8 C 21.8 C US7,NB 8.7B 8.8B 6B 6B US7,SB 8.8B 8.9B 7.3B 7.88 OVERALL INTERSECTION 9 B 9.1 B 7.6 B 7.9 B US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 17.7 C 17.8 C 19.3 C 19.3 C EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 17 C 17 C 21.6 C 21.6 C US7,NB 8.6B 8.7B 11.8B 12.3B US7,SB 8.4B 8.4B 11.6E 12.6E OVERALL INTERSECTION 9.3 B 9.4 B 13 B 13.6 B 5.3 QUEUE LENGTH ANALYSIS Table 7 illustrates the calculated queues at the Shelburne Road approaches to the study intersections. This table compares the available storage space between intersections or for turning bays with the forecast 95th percentile queues during the 2000 and 2005 build scenarios. Storage capacities are exceeded at 5 intersections, as shown in Table 7. Northbound through movement capacities along Shelburne Road between Queen City Part: Drive, Laurel Hill Drive, and Brewer Parkway are estimated to exceed available storage during the 2005 P1V1 peak hour. Capacity for southbound through movements and left turn movements are exceeded at IDX Drive. The large number of southbound left turns result in queues extending through the Imperial Drive and MacIntosh Avenue intersections during the 2005 Alai peak hour. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Table 7. g5'h Percentile Queue Lengths at Study Intersections (measurements in feet) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 14 STORAGE INTERSECTION APPROACH AVAILABLE 2000 BUILD 2005 BUILD AM PM AM PM US 7/1-10ME AVE NB THRU 370 220 275 229 296 NB LEFT 150 187 206 192 216 US 7/OUTLET CENTER NB THRU 540 212 268 220 288 NB LEFT 100 92 95 93 97 SB THRU 370 149 216 169 225 SB LEFT 120 77 76 77 76 US 7/1-189 RAMP C NB THRU 790 119 203 124 224 SB THRU 540 96 241 112 252 US 7/SWIFT ST NB THRU 400 177 268 185 278 SB THRU 790 163 224 201 233 SB LEFT 210 102 110 104 ill US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK NB THRU 710 163 252 171 1653 SB THRU 400 166 227 210 236 US 7/13REWER PARKWAY NB THRU 430 174 287 195 910 NB LEFT 110 103 195 105 212 SB THRU 710 224 251 270 256 SB LEFT 110 81 99 82 101 US 7/LAUREL HILL DR NB THRU 1000 203 275 213 953 NB LEFT 200 84 121 84 132 SB THRU 430 223 241 296 252 SB LEFT 100 96 128 97 133 US 7/13ALDWIN AVE NB THRU 550 128 201 133 232 NB LEFT 125 77 76 77 76 SB THRU 1000 137 163 167 170 SB LEFT 125 87 81 88 81 US 7/MACINTOSH NB THRU 1255 151 223 132 251 NB LEFT 100 81 91 80 93 SB THRU 550 257 279 267 286 SB LEFT 100 77 78 76 78 'I'he over -capacity conditions between IDX Drive and MacTmosh Avenue are generally improved after the VAOT improvements, although the vehicle queue during the 2005 AM peak does exceed capacity between IDX Drive and Imperial Drive. Southbound left turn capacity would also be exceeded at the Allen Road intersection during the 2005 PM peak after these IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 15 improvements. Other than Allen Road, the VAOT Shelburne Road improvements are projected to reduce queues at all other intersections south of IDX Drive. Table 7. 95th Percentile Queue Lengths at Study Intersections (measurements in feet) STORAGE 2005 BUILD WITH VAOT INTERSECTION APPROACH AVAILABLE 2000 BUILD 2005 BUILD IMPROVEMENTS AM PM AM PM AM PM US 7/IDX DRIVE NB THRU 1790 155 234 554 269 243 297 NB LEFT 150 (Improved) - - - 77 80 SB THRU 1255 127 257 114 165 190 250 SB LEFT 450 (Improved) 1970 626 96 US 7/13ARTLETT BAY RD NB THRU 2250 159 233 175 367 172 263 NB LEFT 250 (Improved) - - 87 94 SB THRU 1790 114 195 118 201 146 292 SB LEFT 300 (Improved) - - 128 93 US 7/ALLEN ROAD NB THRU 1165 1937 320 3991 318 208 232 SB THRU 2250 183 279 177 1539 128 133 185(existing)/ 250 SB LEFT (Improved) 84 91 83 93 112 275 US 7/PINE HAVEN NB THRU 3500 186 207 197 212 152 195 NB LEFT 200 (Improved) - - - - 89 76 SB THRU 1165 198 1477 204 4174 162 241 SB LEFT 150 (Improved) - - - - 85 91 US 7/BAY ROAD SB THRU 3500 185 302 191 315 125 245 Left(existing)/ 250 SB LEFT (Improved) 78 81 78 81 84 92 6. DISCUSSION The section discusses the level of service results for each intersection from north to south. US 7/HOME AVENUE TO US 7/MACINTOSH AVENUE/FAYETTE DRIVE IThe intersections between US 7/Home Avenue to US 7/Macintosh Avenue operate at acceptable levels of service up to the 2005 build scenario. Some intersection signal timings were changed from the VAOT signal timing plans to improve overall levels of service. Signal timing changes were made to the following intersections: ♦ Shelburne Road/Swift Street I♦ Shelburne Road/Queen City Parkway 1 ♦ Shelburne Road/Brewer Parkway ♦ Shelburne Road/Macintosh Avenue IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 16 US 7/IMPERIAL DRIVE The US 7/Imperial Drive intersection operates at acceptable overall levels of service for all scenarios. This intersection is not signalized. Currently, an estimated 35 vehicles (approximately 1 vehicle arriving every 2 minutes in the pm peak hour) approach this intersection on Imperial Drive during the PM peak hour. A possible concern is that vehicles approaching US 7 on Imperial Drive will be unduly delayed by the increased exiting traffic from IDX. Traffic exiting IDX will be primarily right -turning traffic exiting at IDX Drive. This traffic exits during a protected right turn phase within the signal timing sequence. Right turns on red are also permitted. To better understand the magnitude of the delay at the US 7/Imperial Drive intersection, a traffic simulation was developed for this set of intersections (i.e. US 7/IDX Drive and US 7/Imperial Drive). Two simulations were conducted, one permitting right turns on red at IDX Drive, and a second prohibiting right turns on red at IDX Drive. The computer simulations indicate that vehicles exiting Imperial Drive to merge with the US 7 mainstream traffic are only slightly more delayed, when right turns on red are permitted than 1 when prohibited. This is considered a slight inconvenience experienced by a relatively few vehicles (33 in the PM peak hour). US 7/HOLMES ROAD/IDX DRIVE The US 7/Holmes Road/IDX Drive Intersection operates at LOS "B" and better for all no - build scenarios and LOS "C" or better for most build scenarios. The 2005 AM build scenario operates at LOS "E" because the US 7 approaches operate at LOS "E." Signal timings for the 2005 scenarios were altered from VAOT timings to maximize green times where needed. The intersection is scheduled for improvement as part of the VAOT Shelburne Road project. With these improvements, the intersection will operate at LOS "C" for the 2005 build scenarios. The Shelburne Road improvement project is currently delayed. Therefore, we recommend that if IDX employs more than 300 additional employees before the Shelburne Road improvements are in place, then IDX should install a southbound left -turn lane on US 7 at IDX Drive and a right turn arrow to IDX Drive to mitigate their traffic impact.? This level of employment is expected some time between 2000 and 2001. 7 The intersection drops to LOS "E" with the addition of 300 employees to IDX. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 17 1 US 7/BARTLETT BAY ROAD/GREEN MOUNTAIN ROAD US 7/Bartlett Bay Road operates at acceptable levels of service through the 2005 build scenario. 1 This intersection will likely be used as an alternative route for IDX employees at the main office J buildings traveling to or from the south. There are high delays (LOS "E") for the Bartlett Bay Road approach for PM peak hours under the 2005 build scenario. Traffic signal timings were changed from the VAOT plans to improve delays during the 1998, 2000 and 2005 PM peak hours. J The planned VAOT Shelburne Road improvements for this intersection will reduce delays for all scenarios to LOS "C" or better. These improvements will accommodate the increased IDX traffic. US 7/ALLEN ROAD The US 7/Allen Road operates under good levels of service for the 1998, 2000 build and no - build, and 2005 PM peak hour scenarios. The intersection operates in 2005 AM at LOS "E" for no -build and LOS "F" for build scenarios. The northbound approach operates under LOS "E" or worse for all AM scenarios. Increased capacity along Shelburne Road, due to the planned VAOT improvements, would improve the 2005 northbound level of service to LOS `B" in the PM scenarios and LOS "A" in the AM scenarios. The intersection would maintain an overall LOS "B" for the 2005 scenarios. US 7/PINE HAVEN SHORE/LOCUST HILL DRIVE US 7/Pine Haven Shore operates at LOS "A" under all AM scenarios. During the PM peak hours, the intersection operates at LOS "F" for all scenarios. Both US 7 approaches operate at LOS "F" and the Locust Hill approach operates at LOS "E" or worse during the PM peak hours. Long delays are partly due to the restrictive road geometry at this intersection. These problems will be mitigated through the VAOT Shelburne Road improvement program. The Shelburne Road improvements would change the geometry at this intersection so that the 2005 levels of service would not exceed LOS "C" on any approach and LOS `B" for the intersection. US 7/BAY ROAD/EXECUTIVE DRIVE US 7/Bay Road operates acceptably for all scenarios. The lowest level of service for any approach is LOS "D" at the eastbound Bay Road and southbound Shelburne Road approaches, in the 2005 PM build scenario. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 18 J "I'he Shelburne Road improvements will reduce approach delays to LOS "C" or better and maintain intersection levels of service at LOS `B" for 2005 no -build and build scenarios. 1 7. SAFETY ANALYSIS A safety review of Shelburne Road, to the north and south of IDX, indicates there are four High 1 Accident Locations (HAL).8 One is located at the US 7/Holmes Road intersection and four are 0.3-mile segments along Shelburne Road (Table 8). Table 8: High Accident Locations Inside the Shelburne Road Study Area CRITICAL ACCIDENT ACTUAL ACCIDENT RATIO: MILEAGE APPROXIMATE LOCATION RATE RATE ACT./CRIT. 4.847-0.293 Shelburne/ South Burlington 3.659 4.335 1.185 border to north of Allen Rd 0.393-0.693 North and south of Bartlett Bay 3.579 4.049 1.131 Rd intersection 0.860-0.880 Holmes Road Intersection 0.686 0.955 1.392 1.093-1.393 From Baldwin Ave. to Laurel 3.534 3.691 1.044 Hill Dr. 1.493-0.055 1-189 Interchange with US 7, 3.524 7.039 1.998 Burlington/S. Burlington border The majority of crashes at the Holmes Road intersection are of three general types: rear -end collisions (51%), broadside collisions (260/6), and turning -related collisions (15%).9 These accidents occurred over all years of record, except 1996 where there is no record of accidents. This coincides with the signalization update program along US 7 and specifically the addition of an advanced green phase to southbound US 7 at Holmes Road/IDX Drive. Given the significant improvement in safety recorded in 1996 as a result of this program, we expect that the intersection will be dropped from the High Accident Location list is the next few years. 8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The South Burlington Planning Commission has requested that IDX submit a plan for developing and implementing a transportation demand program. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) refers to a set of policies, prescriptions, and services designed to reduce 8 VAOT Planning Division, High Accident Locations, 1990-1994 Data, December 1995; Supplemental High Accident Locations, 1990-1994 Data, February 1996. VAOT, State Hi gbway Sorted Accident File, 1992-1996. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 19 traffic during congested periods. TDM strategies include: van pools, preferential parking for multi -occupant vehicles, off peak shift changes, and on site services that are designed to minimize trips off site. For some employers, TDM can be very effective in reducing overall vehicle traffic. IDX will implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan that supports a reduction in single -occupancy -vehicle (SOV) commuting trips. To this end, IDX is working with the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Commission to refine its TDM Plan. This work will include a survey of IDX employees about travel options, and an analysis of the employees' home locations. Based on these data, the feasibility of vanpools and/or subscription bus services will be evaluated. At this time (prior to the completion of the CCMPO analyses), the draft TDM Plan includes: 1) Variable/Flexible Working Hours —Most IDX employees do not work a set shift and therefore do not all enter the roadway system simultaneously. This spreads out the impact of IDX commutes. 2) Pedestrian Access —The site plan will include pedestrian access to the adjacent street system. 3) Bicycle Facilities — Protected bicycle racks and shower facilities will be provided. 4) Bus —CCTA bus passes for commuting employees would be paid for by IDX. Bus users would be further supported with a guaranteed ride home program (administered by CCTA). 5) Van ool —If determined to be feasible by CCMPO and there was sufficient employee interest, IDX would sponsor employee vanpools, provided that these programs would not be inconsistent with flexible working schedules at IDX. If practical, the guaranteed ride home program could be extended to vanpoolers and/or carpoolers. 9. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This report evaluated the traffic congestion impacts of an expansion of the IDX facility on Shelburne Rd (US 7) in South Burlington, Vermont. Based on traffic counts at the existing facility, IDX generates approximately 0.42 vehicle trips per employee during the PM peak hour of traffic on US 7. With 1,202 new employees, the facility is expected to generate an additional 508 new trips during the PM peak hour. These trips were distributed along the surrounding road network based on existing travel patterns and expected places of residence of the workforce. Based on the results of an analysis of intersection levels of service on 14 intersections from Burlington to Shelburne along US 7, we IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 21 January 1999 page 20 J conclude that there will be increases in delays for Shelburne Road within parts of the study area. However, Shelburne Road to the south of the IDX property, including the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection, will be reconstructed over the next few years according to current VAOT plans. With these improvements, any congestion problems along Shelburne Road in this area will be corrected. J The most severely affected intersection along Shelburne Road is the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection. When there is a significant number of left -turning vehicles, the lack of an exclusive left -turn lane on US 7 affects overall intersection levels of service. We recommend reviews of 1 signal timings at the intersection until the total additional employee numbers (new and relocated) reach 300. At this point (likely between 2000 and 2001), we recommend that an exclusive left - turn lane on southbound Shelburne Road be constructed, as well as the addition of a right turn Iarrow for the IDX Drive approach to the intersection. These two additions will improve delays J to acceptable levels at the intersection. In summary: 1) Overall levels of service during the AM and PM peak hour north of IDX are acceptable with the IDX expansion in 2005. I2) IDX Drive/US 7 operates poorly during the 2005 AM build scenario. 3) South of IDX Drive, certain intersections begin to show poor levels of service by 1 2005, including the Bartlett Bay Road approach to US 7, the US 7/Allen Road and US 7/Pine Haven Road intersections, and the Bay Road approach to US 7. However, these intersections improve to acceptable levels of service with the construction of the VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements. To mitigate these impacts, we recommend: 1) With an expansion of IDX to over 300 employees, a left -turn lane should be constructed on southbound US 7 and a right turn signal should be added to service IDX Drive. 2) Intersections south of IDX Drive will significantly improve levels of congestion with the construction of the VAOT Shelburne Road improvements. At this time, 1 we do not recommend any additional mitigation for those affected intersections beyond what will be constructed by VAOT. 3) IDX should continue their transportation demand management program that includes flex -time and support of alternative transportation modes. If it does not already, the program could include a clearinghouse for vanpool/carpool information for employees. The company can also provide secure bicycle facilities and showers for those wishing to walk or bike to work. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 21 January 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 21 4) 'Traffic signal offsets and timings should be maintained in the corridor to improve coordination between signals. With these mitigation measures, the project will not cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding highways. Trafc Impact Study for.• IDX Expansion South Burlington, Vermont Preparedfor.- 1DX Systems Corporation Revised 16 February 1999 RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. White River Junction, Vermont TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................1 2. STUDY AREA....................................................................................................2 3. EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS................................................4 3.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................4 4. TRAFFIC FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT................................................5 I4.1 TRIP GENERATION..............................................................................................5 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION.............................................................................................7 I 5. CONGESTION ANALYSIS................................................................................7 I 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION...........................................................................7 5.2 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS............................................................................. 8 I5.3 QUEUE LENGTH ANALYSIS............................................................................... 13 6. DISCUSSION.....................................................................................................15 US 7/HOME AVENUE TO US 7/MCINTOSH AVENUE/FAYETTE DRIVE .............................. 15 US7/IMPERIAL DRIVE............................................................................................ 16 US 7/HOLMES ROAD/IDX DRIVE................................................................................ 16 US 7/BARTLETT BAY ROAD/GREEN MOUNTAIN ROAD .................................................. 17 I US7/ALLEN ROAD.................................................................................................. 17 US 7/PINE HAVEN SHORE/LOCUST HILL DRIVE........................................................... 17 US 7/BAY ROAD/EXECUTIVE DRIVE........................................................................... 17 I 7. SAFETY ANALYSIS........................................................................................18 8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN..................................18 9. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS................................................19 1. INTRODUCTION A medical software firm, IDX Systems Corporation, proposes to expand its facilities in South Burlington, Vermont. The existing buildings on the property have 144,000 square feet of space, occupied by approximately 573 full-time employees. The proposed expansion would add a 240,000 square -foot building and demolish an existing 20,000 square -foot building. Additionally, a parking garage with 600 parking spaces would be added to the property. There would be an added work force at the IDX Drive building of more than 1,200 new and relocated employees. The IDX property abuts US 7 (Shelburne Road) in South Burlington (Figure 1). Almost all of the vehicles enter and exit the property through the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection with US 7. This report focuses on the effects this proposed expansion would have on congestion and safety along US 7. This study includes the results from the following activities: ♦ Conducting a week-long automatic traffic count at IDX to aid in estimating future trip generation; ♦ Estimating distribution of traffic from the IDX expansion along US 7, using a transportation network model developed by Resource Systems Group for the Chittenden County Municipal Planning Organization; ♦ Forecasting traffic volumes along US 7 using Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAO-f) data; ♦ Analyzing levels of service along US 7 under no -build and build scenarios for the years 2000 and 2005 (the estimated build -out year and 5 years beyond), and; ♦ Recommending mitigation and improvement strategies to improve overall congestion and safety. This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the Highway Capacity Manual,1 the Trip Generation Manual,2 Trafc Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide,3 and the Vermont State De ign Standards.4 1 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity Afanual: Special Report 209, Washington DC, 1994. 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Washington DC, 1997. 3 VAOT, Planning & Traffic Research Division, Traffic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide, 1992. 4 VAOT, Vermont State Standards for Design of Transportation Construction, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation on Freeways, Roads, and Streets, July 1997. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 2. STUDY AREA Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 Vermont Agency of Transportation guidelines require the analysis of all intersections that receive 75 or more vehicle trips from the project during the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. We made an analysis to determine this scope by using the regional transportation network model for Chittenden County. With the model, we observed how the new IDX trips were distributed along Shelburne Road to the north and to the south of the IDX property. We then calculated the percentage of trips passing through individual intersections. Intersections with more than 75 trips passing through were chosen to be analyzed in this study. These intersections are shown in Figure 1 and listed in 'Table 1. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 3 Fioure 1: Local Road Network, Shelburne Road and Studv Intersections A TO BURLINGTON N A Home Ave O'Dell Drive NOT TO SCALE Sears Outlet 1-189 Ramp C 1-189 Ramp A Swift Street Queen City Park Rd 'aR Brewer Parkway 0: Laurel Hill Drive AO C 7 Baldwin Ave �d -C McIntosh Ave Holmes Road IDX Drive Extension =t IDX Property Bartlett Bay Rd Green Mtn Dr. Allen Road Pine Haven Shore Locust Hill Road V 10 O a! d s H Executive Drive �a IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 3. EXISTING & FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 4 Traffic data for many of the signalized intersections along US 7 have been collected by VAOT. Table 1 shows the intersections included in this study and the date of the count. These counts were adjusted to reflect the average AM peak hour volume and the PM design hour volume, using VAOT Continuous Traffic Counting (CTC) Station D002, on US 7 in Shelburne. All intersection turning movement volumes have been adjusted to represent the projected 1998, 2000, 2005 AM peak and PM design hour volumes. Table 1: Study Intersections for Shelburne Road INTERSECTION WITH US 7, SHELBURNEROAD COUNT DATE SOURCE US 7/Home Avenue/O'Dell Drive 6/14/98 VAOT US 7/Shelburne Road Plaza/Outlet Center 6/14/98 VAOT US 7/1-189 Ramp C 7/3/96 VAOT US 7/Swift Street 3/20/98 VAOT US 7/Queen City Park Road 4/26/96 VAOT US 7/Brewer Parkway 7/6/95 VAOT US 7/Laurel Hill Drive/Hannafords Dr. 3/5/98 VAOT US 7/Baldwin Avenue 2/18/98 VAOT US 7/McIntosh Avenue 1/20/99 RSG US 7/Holmes Road Ext./IDX Drive 9/29/98 RSG US 7/Allen Road 4/2/98 VAOT US 7/Pine Haven Shore/Locust Hill Rd. 1/20/99 RSG US 7/Bay Road/Executive Drive 6/29/95 VAOT IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 16 February 1999 page 5 4. TRAFFIC FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 4.1 TRIP GENERATION IIt is important to understand the trip generation characteristics of the IDX property to be able to accurately estimate the likely trips generated by new employees. RSG placed automatic traffic recorders at all entrances to IDX. The automatic traffic recorders documented vehicles entering Iand exiting IDX continuously from 2 November to 9 November 1998. Figure 2 shows the number of vehicles entering and exiting IDX driveways during the week.5 Figure 2: Total Vehicle Trips for IDX, Measured by Day of Week J There is a significant difference between the weekday and weekend trips to and from IDX. For this reason, we have limited the trip generation estimates and the capacity analyses to the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Figure 3 shows the average trips for the study week, separated into inbound and outbound vehicle trips. The peak hours of traffic at IDX are during the 8 to 9 am and the 5 to 6 pm hours. The averages of these data represent the trip generation rates we used for this study (Table 2). 5 Note: Volumes for Monday were estimated by using the data from 11/2 and 11/9, and weekly averages where data were missing. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Figure 3: Average Weekday Vehicle Trips, Inbound and Outbound Trips Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 6 300 —Inbound Vehicles 250 Outbound Vehicles a 0 200CL d - y 150-- t a 100 - --- - - - -- - - > / I a 50 0 a ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a a a CL a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N V' (O OD O CV N CD O Figure 4: Direct Comparison of Peak Hours IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 16 February 1999 page 7 By 2000, IDX plans to add 136 employees to its facility at IDX Drive. IDX plans add an estimated 1,202 employees by 2005, amounting to a total employment of 1,775. Trip generation rates are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Rates at IDX PERCENT PERCENT TRIP GENERATION NEW TRIPS BY NEW TRIPS BY OF TRIPS OF TRIP SCENARIO RATE (per employee) 2000 2005 IN OUl kM Peak Hour 0.52 70 623 93% 7% 'M Peak Hour 0.42 57 508 5% 950/c 4.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION By following the general trends of historic turning movements, and extrapolating the number of trips to follow certain routes from the regional demand model, we estimated the distribution of these new trips in 2000 and 2005. We also estimated that some new northbound trips would use the planned connection between IDX parking lots and Green Mountain Drive. Based on shortest route calculations, approximately 60% of the northbound traffic will use the Shelburne Road/Green Mountain Drive intersection, while the rest of the northbound traffic (409/6) will pass through the intersection and use IDX Drive. These ratios apply for exiting traffic also. 5. CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION Level -of -Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual defines six grades to describe the LOS at an intersection. LOS is based on the stopped delay per vehicle.6 Table 7 shows the various LOS grades, qualitative descriptions, and quantitative definitions for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections. Highway Capacity Manual, p. 9-6. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 8 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections LOS CHARACTERSTICS SIGNALIZED STOPPED DELAY (sec) UNSIGNALIZED TOTAL DELAY (se A Little or no delay <_ 5.0 <_ 5.0 B Short delays 5.1-15.0 5.1-10.0 C Average delays 15.1-25.0 10.1-20.0 D Long delays 25.1-40.0 20.1-30.0 E Very long delays 40.1-60.0 30.1-45.0 F Extreme delays 60.0 < 45.0 < 5.2 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS Table 4 through Table 6 summarize the level of service results for all scenarios. The levels of service (LOS) are listed by approach, and the overall intersection LOS is written in italics. A typical listing is, "14.8 B." The number, "14.8", is the stopped delay per vehicle in seconds. The letter `B" is the level of service, as described in Table 3. Table 4 illustrates the analysis results for the 1998 AM and PM no -build peak periods and the 2000 AM and PM peak periods for no -build and build scenarios. The 2000 Build scenarios include 136 additional employees. Table 5 summarizes the 2005 AM and PM peak periods for no -build and build scenarios. The 2005 Build scenarios include the full build -out, with 1,202 additional employees. Table 6 lists LOS analysis results at intersections affected by the VAOT Shelburne Road improvement project. The planned Shelburne Road improvements will be for intersections between Imperial Drive and Bay Road. The analysis scenarios will be for the 2005 AM and PM peak periods, including no -build and build conditions. The roadway will have two through lanes in the northbound and southbound directions. Exclusive left -turn lanes will also be installed on the Shelburne Road approaches at these intersections. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Table 4: Level of Service Results, 1998 and 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 9 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 1998 NO BUILD 2000 AM 2000 PM AM PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOME AVE HOME AVE, EB 14.8 B 21.8 C 14.8 B 14.8 B 22.1 C 22.1 C BACON COURT, WB 14.4 B 18.7 C 14.4 B 14.4 B 18.7 C 18.7 C US7,NB 13.7B 13.6E 13.9E 146 14.2B 14.4B US7,SB 10.7B 9.38 10.8B 10.9B 9.3B 9.4B OVERALL INTERSECTION 12.9 B 13.3 B 13.1 B 13.16 13.6 8 13.88 US 7/SHELBURNE RD SHELBURNE RD PLAZA, EB 17.8 C 19.1 C 17.8 C 17.8 C 19.1 C 19.1 C PLAZA OUTLET CENTER DRIVE, WB 17.9 C 19 C 17.9 C 17.9 C 19.1 C 19.1 C US7,NB 7.3B 8.4B 7.4B 7.5B 9.1B 9.4B US7,SB 6.9B 8.5B 6.9B 7B 8.6B 8.6B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.5 B 8.6 B 7.6 B 77 B 9.1 B 9.3 B US 7/1-189 RAMP C 1-189 RAMP C, WB 10.2 B 12.6 B 10.38 10.4 B 12.7 B 12.7 B US7,NB 7.5B 9.7B 7.5B 7.5B 9.7B 9.8B US7,SB 7.4B 11.7B 7.4B 7.5B 11.9B 11.9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.5 B 11.5 B 8.68 8.78 1 11.6 B 11.6 B US 7/SWIFT STREET SWIFT STREET, WB 15.3 C 18.4 C 15.4 C 15.6 C 18.6 C 18.6 C US7,NB 7.6B 12.6B 7.7B 7.7B 13.3E 13.9B US7,SB 1.4A 2.8A 1.5A 1.5A 3A 3A OVERALL INTERSECTION 5.7 B 9.1 B 5.88 5.8 B 9.5 B 9.8 B US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK QUEEN CITY PARK, EB 16.4 C 27.3 D 16.4 C 16.4 C 28 D 28 D US7,NB 1.9A 3.9A 1.9A 1.9A 4.5A 5.1B US7,SB 1.9A 2.1A 1.9A 2A 2.2A 2.2A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3 A 5.5 8 3 A 3 A 5.9 B 6.2 B US 7/13REWER PARKWAY BREWER PARKWAY, EB 12.6 B 22.3 C 12.7 B 12.7 B 22.8 C 22.8 C BREWER PARKWAY, WB 20 C 23.8 C 20 C 20 C 23.9 C 23.9 C US7,NB 5.7B 11.4E 5.8B 5.8B 12.4B 13.4B US7,SB 6.5B 6.9B 6.7B 7B 7.1B 7.1B OVERALL INTERSECTION 6.6 B 10.78 6.8 B 78 11.4 B 11.9 B US 7/LAUREL HILL DRIVE HANNAFORDS, EB 18.1 C 28 D 18.2 C 18.2 C 29.6 D 29.6 D LAUREL HILL, WB 21.60 21.2 C 21.8 C 21.7 C 21.2 C 21.2 C US7,NB 5.8B 10.6B 5.8B 5.8B 11.38 12.1E US7,SB 6B 7.3B 6.28 6.5B 7.5B 7.6B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.2 B 116 7.3 B 7.5 B 11.5 B 11.9 B IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 10 Table 4: Level of Service Results, 1998 and 2000 (Continued) INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 1998 NO BUILD 2000 AM 2000 PM AM PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/BALDWIN AVE. DRIVEWAY, EB 18.4 C 19.4 C 18.4 C 18.4 C 19.5 C 19.5 C BALDWIN AVE, WB 20.9 C 19.8 C 21 C 21 C 19.8 C 19.8 C US7,NB 0.2A 1.2A 0.2A 0.2A 1.3A 1.4A US7,SB 0.2A 1A 0.2A 0.2A 1A 1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 1.2 A 1.8 A 1.2 A 1.2 A 1.8 A 1.9 A US 7/MCINTOSH AVE FAYETTE DRIVE, EB 15.3 C 19.6 C 15.3 C 15.3 C 19.7 C 19.7 C MCINTOSH AVE, WB 14.8 B 18.7 C 14.88 14.88 18.7 C 18.7 C US7,NB 2.2A 2.3A 2.2A 2.3A 2.4A 2.6A US7,SB 12.2B 10.8E 12.8B 14.1B 11.4B 11.4B OVERALL INTERSECTION 8 B 7 B 8.3 B 9.1 B 74 B 74 B US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 18.7 C 19.8 C 18.7 C 20 C 27 D 27.4 D IDX DRIVE, WB 18.5 C 19.7 C 14.2 B 15.3 C 16.7 C 17.3 C US7,NS 4.5A 13.5B 4.5A 3.5A 8.1 B 8.1 B US7,SB 0.7A 1.9A 0.8A 0.9A 13B 20.9C OVERALL INTERSECTION 2.9 A 9.8 B 2.9 A 2.5 A 12.1 B 15.4 C US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 19.1 C 31.1 D 19.1 C 19.1 C 34.3 D 28.7 D GREEN MTN RD, WB 18.7 C 21.6 C 18.7 C 18.7 C 21.9 C 21.3 C US7,NB 5A 15.3C 5.1B 5.2B 17.5C 22.3C US7,SB 0.2A 2.5A 0.2A 0.2A 2.6A 3.3A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.4 A 11.2 B 3.5 A 3.5 A 12.4 B 14.38 US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 26.6 D 23.5 C 24 C 33.4 D 23.8 C 23.8 C US7,NB 14.5B 11.8E 59.3E 14.7B 13.2B 13.2B US7,SB 1.3A 7.4B 1.9A 1.3A 9.2B 9.9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 10.9 B 11 B 36.5 D 11.6 B 12.4 B 12.8 B US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 18.6 C 24.1 C 18.6 C 18.6 C 24.1 C 24.1 C LOCUST HILL, WB 18.7 C 26.3 D 18.7 C 18.7 C 26.4 D 26.4 D US7,NB 1.4A 0.9A 1.6A 1.7A to 1A US7,SB 1.1A 28.5D 1.3A 1.3A 36.1D 41.4E OVERALL INTERSECTION 2 A 17.1 C 2.2 A 2.2 A 21.1 C 24 C US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 13.3 B 22 C 13.3 B 13.3 B 23 C 23 C EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 12.6 B 18.9 C 12.6 B 12.6 B 19.2 C 19.2 C US7,NS 4.5A 15.5C 4.6A 4.6A 17.4C 17.4C US7,SB 3.8A 12.88 3.8A 3.8A 14.2E 14.7B OVERALL INTERSECTION 4.9 A 15 B 4.9 A 5 A 16.5 C 16.7 C IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Table 5: Level of Service Results, 2005 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 11 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOME AVE HOME AVE, EB 14.98 14.9 B 22.6 C 22.6 C BACON COURT, WB 14.4 B 14.4 B 18.8 C 18.8 C US7,NB 14.6E 14.7B 15.8C 18.8C US7,SB 10.9B 11.4B 9.5B 9.5B OVERALL INTERSECTION 13.5 B 13.6 B 14.7 B 16.6 C US 7/SHELBURNE RD SHELBURNE RD PLAZA, EB 17.8 C 17.8 C 19.1 C 19.1 C PLAZA OUTLET CENTER DRIVE, WB 17.9 C 18 C 19.1 C 19.1 C US7,NB 7.8B 7.9B 12B 19.1C US7,SB 7.1 B 7.6B 9B 9B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.9 B 8.1 B 11.1 B 15.6 C US 7/1-189 RAMP C 1-189 RAMP C, WB 10.4 B 11.5 B 13.1 B 13.1 B US7,NB 7.6B 7.6B 9.9B 10.5B US7,SB 7.58 7.8B 12.5E 12.6E OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.7 B 9.3 B 12 B 12.2 B US 7/SWIFT STREET SWIFT STREET, WB 15.8 C 17.9 C 19.4 C 22.4 C US7,NB 7.9B 88 16C 16C US7,SB 1.7A 2.1A 3.4A 4.1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 6 B 6.3 B 11 B 11.9 B US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK QUEEN CITY PARK, EB 16.5 C 16.9 C 23 C 56.6 E US7,NB 2.1A 2.1A 18.2C 18.1C US7,SB 2.1A 3.1A 5.4B 1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.2 A 3.7 A 13.3 B 15 B US 7/BREWER PARKWAY BREWER PARKWAY, EB 12.7 B 13 B 25.1 D 30.6 D BREWER PARKWAY, WB 20.1 C 20.1 C 24.1 C 25.4 D US7,NB 6B 6B 16.3C 33D US7,SB 7.1 B 16.8C 7.7B 7.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 7.1 B 12.6 B 13.7 B 22.9 C US 7/LAUREL HILL DRIVE HANNAFORDS, EB 14.8 B 18.3 C 35.2 D 37.1 D LAUREL HILL, WB 18.4 C 21.9 C 21.3 C 16.1 C US7,NB 9.5B 6.3B 13.9E 37.1D US7,SB 10.8B 24.8C 8.1 B 8.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 10.8 B 17.7 C 13.4 B 24.3 C IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Table 5: Level of Service Results, 2005 (Continued) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 12 INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/BALDWIN AVE. DRIVEWAY, EB 18.4 C 18.4 C 19.5 C 19.5 C BALDWIN AVE, WB 21.3 C 21.7 C 19.9 C 19.9 C US7,NB 0.2A 0.2A 1.4A 2.7A US7,SB 0.2A 0.6A I 1.1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 1.2 A 1.4 A 1.9 A 2.6 A US 7/MCINTOSH AVE FAYETTE DRIVE, EB 15.4 C 19.5 C 19.8 C 20.5 C MCINTOSH AVE, WB 14.9 B 18.5 C 18.8 C 19.4 C US7,NB 2.4A 0.5A 2.9A 5.2B US7,SB 14.7B 14.1 B 13.5B 12.1 B OVERALL INTERSECTION 9.4 B 9.3 B 8.5 B 8.8 B US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 15 B 20.1 C 23 C 24.3 C IDX DRIVE, WB 14.9 B 9.3 B 15 B 37.1 D US7,NB 9B 46.7E 13.8B 19.4C US7,SB 7.1 B 52.5E 0.2A 0.6A OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.2 B 48.8 E 9 B 16.5 C US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 19.2 C 19.2 C 36.1 D 43.8 E GREEN MTN RD, WB 18.7 C 18.8 C 21.5 C 38.9 D US7,NB 5.5B 6.4B 36.7D 33.3D US7,SB 0.3A 0.4A 3.4A 3.2A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.7 A 4.3 A 20.8 C 21 C US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 36.1 D 40.3 E 24.9 C 25.3 D US7,NB 87F 119.5F 18.6C 12.9E US7,SB 1.8A 1.8A 16.8C 33.8D OVERALL INTERSECTION 53.2 E 72.9 F 18.4 C 25 C US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 18.6 C 18.6 C 24.2 C 24.2 C LOCUST HILL, WB 18.8 C 18.8 C 27 D 27 D US7,NB 2.4A 3.4A 1.4A 1.4A US7,SB 1.9A 2.3A 61 F 128.8F OVERALL INTERSECTION 2.8 A 3.5 A 34.6 D 72.4 F US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 13.3 B 13.4 B 33.7 D 33.7 D EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 12.6 B 12.6 B 21.7 C 21.7 C US7,NB 4.8A 5.2B 21C 21.3C US7,SB 3.8A 3.9A 16.5C 25.7D OVERALL INTERSECTION 5 A 5.3 B 19.9 C 24.1 C A'A IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 13 Table 6: Level of Service Results, 2005, with Shelburne Road Improvements INTERSECTION LANE/APPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 21.4 C 23.2 C 29.1 D 29.9 D IDX DRIVE, WB 10.1 B 9.8 B 11.98 18.8 C US 7, NB 21.1 C 21.1 C 20.6 C 20.6 C US7,SB 6.5B 14.5E 6.3B 10B OVERALL INTERSECTION 13.1 B 16.8 C 14.4 B 16.9 C US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 18.4 C 18.5 C 21.4 C 18.6 C GREEN MTN RD, WB 20 C 20.2 C 20.1 C 23.7 C US7,NB 4.7A 4.9A 13.5B 15.8C US7,SB 6.3B 6.3B 14.3B 20.8C OVERALL INTERSECTION 6.1 B 6.2 B 14.9 B 19 C US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WB 16.1 C 16.2 C 19.3 C 19.3 C US7,NB 4.1A 4.3A 9.9B 10B US7,SB 5A 5A 12.4E 13.3E OVERALL INTERSECTION 5.4 B 5.5 B 12.2 B 12.7 B US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 15.5 C 15.5 C 20.4 C 20.4 C LOCUST HILL, WB 15.7 C 15.7 C 21.8 C 21.8 C US7,NB 8.7B 8.8B 6B 6B US7,SB 8.8B 8.9B 7.3B 7.8B OVERALL INTERSECTION 9 B 9.1 B 7.6 B 7.9 B US 7/BAY RD BAY ROAD, EB 17.7 C 17.8 C 19.3 C 19.3 C EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 17 C 17 C 21.6 C 21.6 C US7,NB 8.6B 8.7B 11.86 12.3B US7,SB 8.4B 8.4B 11.6B 12.6B OVERALL INTERSECTION 9.3 B 9.4 B 13 B 13.6 B 5.3 QUEUE LENGTH ANALYSIS Table 7 and Table 8 illustrate the calculated queues at the Shelburne Road approaches to the , study intersections. These tables compare the available storage space between intersections or for turning bays with the forecast 95th percentile queues during the 2000 and 2005 build scenarios. For intersections north of IDX Drive, storage capacities are exceeded at 4 intersections. Northbound left -turn queues are estimated to exceed capacity at Home Avenue. Northbound through movement capacities along Shelburne Road between Queen City Park Drive, Brewer Parkway, and Laurel Hill Drive are estimated to exceed available storage during the 2005 PM peak hour. Capacity for southbound left -turn movement is exceeded at Laurel Hill Drive during the same scenario. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Table 7: 951h Percentile Queue Lengths at Study Intersections (measurements in feet) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 14 STORAGE INTERSECTION APPROACH AVAILABLE 2000 BUILD 2005 BUILD AM PM AM PM US 7/HOME AVE NB THRU 370 220 275 229 296 NB LEFT 150 187 206 192 216 US 7/OUTLET CENTER NB THRU 540 212 268 220 288 NB LEFT 100 92 95 93 97 SB THRU 370 149 216 169 225 SB LEFT 120 77 76 77 76 US 7/1-189 RAMP C NB THRU 790 119 203 124 224 SB THRU 540 96 241 112 252 US 7/SWIFT ST NB THRU 400 177 268 185 278 SB THRU 790 163 224 201 233 SB LEFT 210 1 102 110 104 ill US 7/QUEEN CITY PARK NB THRU 710 163 252 171 761 SB THRU 400 166 227 210 214 US 7/BREWER PARKWAY NB THRU 430 174 287 195 910 NB LEFT 110 103 195 105 212 SB THRU 710 224 251 270 256 SB LEFT 110 81 99 82 101 US 7/LAUREL HILL DR NB THRU 1000 203 275 213 953 NB LEFT 200 84 121 84 132 SB THRU 430 223 241 296 252 SB LEFT 100 96 128 97 133 US 7/13ALDWIN AVE NB THRU 550 128 201 133 232 NB LEFT 125 77 76 77 76 SB THRU 1000 137 163 167 170 SB LEFT 125 87 81 88 81 US 7/MCINTOSH NB THRU 1255 151 223 132 251 NB LEFT 100 81 91 80 93 SB THRU 550 257 279 267 286 SB LEFT 100 77 78 1 76 78 The queuing conditions on southbound US 7 at IDX Drive are corrected after the VAOT improvements (Table 8). Southbound left -turn storage at the Allen Road intersection would be improved by the Shelburne Road Improvements but would still be slightly exceeded during the 2005 PM peak. The VAOT Shelburne Road improvements are projected to improve queues at all other intersections south of IDX Drive, as well. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 15 Table 8: 9Fr Percentile Queue Lengths at Study Intersections with Shelburne Rd Improvements (in feet) STORAGE 2005 BUILD WITH VAOT INTERSECTION APPROACH AVAILABLE 2000 BUILD 2005 BUILD IMPROVEMENTS AM PM AM PM AM PM US 7/IDX DRIVE NB THRU 1790 155 234 554 269 243 297 NB LEFT 150 (Improved) - - 77 80 SB THRU 1255 127 257 114 165 169 250 SB LEFT 450 (Improved) 1970 - 303 96 US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD NB THRU 2250 159 233 175 367 172 263 NB LEFT 250 (Improved) - - 87 94 SB THRU 1790 114 195 118 201 146 292 SB LEFT 300 (Improved) 1 128 93 US 7/ALLEN ROAD NB THRU 1165 278 320 3991 318 208 232 SB THRU 2250 147 279 177 1539 128 133 85(existing)/ 250 SB LEFT (Improved) 83 91 83 93 112 275 US 7/PINE HAVEN NB THRU 3500 186 207 197 212 152 195 NB LEFT 200 (Improved) 89 76 SB THRU 1165 198 1477 204 4174 162 241 SB LEFT 150 (Improved) 85 91 US 7/BAY ROAD SB THRU 3500 185 302 191 315 125 245 Left(existing)/ 250 SB LEFT (Improved) 78 81 78 81 84 92 6. DISCUSSION The section discusses the level of service results for each intersection from north to south. US 7/HOME AVENUE TO US 7/MCINTOSH AVENUE/FAYETTE DRIVE The intersections between US 7/Home Avenue to US 7/McIntosh Avenue operate at acceptable levels of service up to the 2005 build scenario. Some intersection signal timings were changed from the VAOT signal timing plans to improve overall levels of service. Signal timing changes were made to the following intersections: A Shelburne Road/Swift Street A Shelburne Road/Queen City Parkway A Shelburne Road/Brewer Parkway A Shelburne Road/McIntosh Avenue IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 US 7/IMPERIAL DRIVE Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 16 The US 7/Imperial Drive intersection operates at acceptable overall levels of service for all scenarios. This intersection is not signalized. Currently, an estimated 35 vehicles (approximately 1 vehicle arriving every 2 minutes in the pm peak hour) approach this intersection on Imperial Drive during the PM peak hour. A possible concern is that vehicles approaching US 7 on Imperial Drive will be unduly delayed by the increased traffic exiting from IDX. Traffic exiting IDX will be primarily right -turning traffic from IDX Drive. This traffic exits during a protected right turn phase within the signal tinting sequence. Right turns on red are also permitted. To better understand the magnitude of the delay at the US 7/Imperial Drive intersection, a traffic simulation was developed for this set of intersections (i.e. US 7/IDX Drive and US 7/Imperial Drive). Two simulations were conducted, one permitting right turns on red at IDX Drive, and a second prohibiting right turns on red at IDX Drive. The computer simulations indicate that vehicles exiting Imperial Drive to merge with the US 7 mainstream traffic are only slightly more delayed, when right turns on red are permitted than when prohibited. This is considered a slight inconvenience experienced by a relatively few vehicles (33 in the PM peak hour). US 7/HOLMES ROAD/IDX DRIVE The US 7/Holmes Road/IDX Drive Intersection operates at LOS `B" and better for all no - build scenarios and LOS "C" or better for most build scenarios. The 2005 AM build scenario operates at LOS "E" because the US 7 approaches operate at LOS "E." Signal timings for the 2005 scenarios were altered from VAOT timings to maximize green times where needed. The intersection is scheduled for improvement as part of the VAOT Shelburne Road project. With these improvements, the intersection will operate at LOS "C" for the 2005 build scenarios. The Shelburne Road improvement project is currently delayed. Therefore, we recommend that if IDX employs more than 300 additional employees before the Shelburne Road improvements are in place, then IDX should install a southbound left -turn lane on US 7 at IDX Drive and a right - turn arrow to IDX Drive to mitigate their traffic impact.? This level of employment is expected some time between 2000 and 2001. Maintaining current practice, the left -turn lanes and the side street approaches will be actuated. 7 The intersection drops to LOS "E" with the addition of 300 employees to IDX. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 16 February 1999 page 17 US 7/BARTLETT BAY ROAD/GREEN MOUNTAIN ROAD US 7/Bartlett Bay Road operates at acceptable levels of service through the 2005 build scenario. This intersection will likely be used as an alternative route for IDX employees at the main office buildings traveling to or from the south. There are high delays (LOS "E'� for the Bartlett Bay Road approach for PM peak hours under the 2005 build scenario. Traffic signal timings were changed from the VAOT plans to improve delays during the 1998, 2000 and 2005 PM peak hours. The planned VAOT Shelburne Road improvements for this intersection will reduce delays for all scenarios to LOS "C" or better. These improvements will accommodate the increased IDX traffic. US 7/ALLEN ROAD The US 7/Allen Road operates under good levels of service for the 1998, 2000 build and no - build, and 2005 PM peak hour scenarios. The intersection operates in 2005 AM at LOS "D" for no -build and LOS "E" for build scenarios. The northbound approach operates under LOS "E" or worse for all AM scenarios. Increased capacity along Shelburne Road, due to the planned VAOT improvements, would improve the 2005 northbound level of service to LOS `B" in the PM scenarios and LOS "A" in the AM scenarios. The intersection would maintain an overall LOS "B" for the 2005 scenarios. US 7/PINE HAVEN SHORE/LOCUST HILL DRIVE US 7/Pine Haven Shore operates at LOS "A" under all AM scenarios. During the PM peak hours, the intersection operates at LOS "C" for 2000 PM peak scenarios and LOS "D" or worse for 2005 PM peak scenarios. Both US 7 approaches operate at LOS "F" and the Locust Hill approach operates at LOS "E" or worse during the PM peak hours. Long delays are partly due to the restrictive road geometry at this intersection. These problems will be mitigated through the VAOT Shelburne Road improvement program. The Shelburne Road improvements would change the geometry at this intersection so that the 2005 levels of service would not exceed LOS "C" on any approach and LOS `B" for the intersection. US 7/BAY ROAD/EXECUTIVE DRIVE US 7/Bay Road operates acceptably for all scenarios. The lowest level of service for any approach is LOS "D" at the eastbound Bay Road and southbound Shelburne Road approaches, in the 2005 PM build scenario. Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 18 IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 The Shelburne Road improvements will reduce approach delays to LOS "C" or better and maintain intersection levels of service at LOS `B" for 2005 no -build and build scenarios. 7. SAFETY ANALYSIS A safety review of Shelburne Road, to the north and south of IDX, indicates there are four High Accident Locations (HAL).8 One is located at the US 7/Holmes Road intersection and four are 0.3-mile segments along Shelburne Road (Table 9). Table 9: High Accident Locations Inside the Shelburne Road Study Area CRITICAL ACCIDENT ACTUAL ACCIDENT RATIO: MILEAGE APPROXIMATE LOCATION RATE RATE ACT./CRIT. 4.847-0.293 Shelburne/ South Burlington 3.659 4.335 1.185 border to north of Allen Rd 0.393-0.693 North and south of Bartlett Bay 3.579 4.049 1.131 Rd intersection 0.860-0.880 Holmes Road Intersection 0,686 0.955 1.392 1.093-1.393 From Baldwin Ave. to Laurel 3.534 3.691 1.044 Hill Dr. 1.493-0.055 1-189 Interchange with US 7, 3.524 7.039 1.998 Burlington/S. Burlington border The majority of crashes at the Holmes Road intersection are of three general types: rear -end collisions (51%), broadside collisions (26%), and turning -related collisions (15%).9 These accidents occurred over all years of record, except 1996 where there is no record of accidents. This coincides with the traffic signal update program along US 7 and specifically the addition of an advanced green phase to southbound US 7 at Holmes Road/IDX Drive. Given the significant improvement in safety recorded in 1996 as a result of this program, we expect that the intersection will be dropped from the High Accident Location list in the next few years. 8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN The South Burlington Planning Commission has requested that IDX submit a plan for developing and implementing a transportation demand program. Transportation Demand Management (IDM) refers to a set of policies, prescriptions, and services designed to reduce 8 VAOT Planning Division, High Accident Locations, 1990-1994 Data, December 1995; Supplemental High Accident Locations, 1990-1994 Data, February 1996. 9 VAOT, State Highway Sorted Accident File, 1992-1996. IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 19 traffic during congested periods. TDM strategies include: van pools, preferential parking for multi -occupant vehicles, off peak shift changes, and on site services that are designed to minimize trips off site. For some employers, TDM can be very effective in reducing overall vehicle traffic. IDX will implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan that supports a reduction in single -occupancy -vehicle (SOV) commuting trips. To this end, IDX is working with the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Commission to refine its TDM Plan. This work will include a survey of IDX employees about travel options, and an analysis of the employees' home locations. Based on these data, the feasibility of vanpools and/or subscription bus services will be evaluated. At this time (prior to the completion of the CCMPO analyses), the draft TDM Plan includes: 1) Variable/Flexible Working Hours —Most IDX employees do not work a set shift and therefore do not all enter the roadway system simultaneously. This spreads out the impact of IDX commutes. 2) Pedestrian Access —The site plan will include pedestrian access to the adjacent street system. 3) Bicycle Facilities — Protected bicycle racks and shower facilities will be provided. 4) Bus —CCTA bus passes for commuting employees would be paid for by IDX. Bus users would be further supported with a guaranteed ride home program (administered by CCTA). 5) Van ool —If determined to be feasible by CCMPO and there was sufficient employee interest, IDX would sponsor employee vanpools, provided that these programs would not be inconsistent with flexible working schedules at IDX. If practical, the guaranteed ride home program could be extended to vanpoolers and/or car-poolers. 9. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This report evaluated the traffic congestion impacts of an expansion of the IDX facility on Shelburne Rd (US 7) in South Burlington, Vermont. Based on traffic counts at the existing facility, IDX generates approximately 0.42 vehicle trips per employee during the PM peak hour of traffic on US 7. With 1,202 new employees, the facility is expected to generate an additional 508 new trips during the PM peak hour. These trips were distributed along the surrounding road network based on existing travel patterns and expected places of residence of the workforce. Based on the results of an analysis of intersection levels of service on 14 intersections from Burlington to Shelburne along US 7, we IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. 16 February 1999 page 20 conclude that there will be increases in delays for Shelburne Road within parts of the study area. However, Shelburne Road to the south of the IDX property, including the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection, will be reconstructed over the next few years according to current VAOT plans. With these improvements, any congestion problems along Shelburne Road in this area will be corrected. The most severely affected intersection along Shelburne Road is the IDX Drive/Holmes Road intersection. When there is a significant number of left -turning vehicles, the lack of an exclusive left -turn lane on US 7 affects overall intersection levels of service. We recommend reviews of signal timings at the intersection until the total additional employee numbers (new and relocated) reach 300. At this point (likely between 2000 and 2001), we recommend that an exclusive left - turn lane on southbound Shelburne Road be constructed, as well as the addition of a right -turn arrow for the IDX Drive approach to the intersection. These two additions will improve delays to acceptable levels at the intersection. In summary: 1) Overall levels of service during the AM and PM peak hour north of IDX are acceptable with the IDX expansion in 2005. 2) IDX Drive/US 7 operates poorly during the 2005 AM build scenario. 3) South of IDX Drive, certain intersections begin to show poor levels of service by 2005, including the Bartlett Bay Road approach to US 7, the US 7/Allen Road and US 7/Pine Haven Road intersections, and the Bay Road approach to US 7. However, these intersections improve to acceptable levels of service with the construction of the VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements. To mitigate these impacts, we recommend: 1) With an expansion of IDX to over 300 employees, a left -turn lane should be constructed on southbound US 7 and aright -turn signal should be added to service IDX Drive. 2) Intersections south of IDX Drive will significantly improve levels of congestion with the construction of the VAOT Shelburne Road improvements. At this time, we do not recommend any additional mitigation for those affected intersections beyond what will be constructed by VAOT. 3) IDX should continue their transportation demand management program that includes flex -time and support of alternative transportation modes. If it does not already, the program could include a clearinghouse for vanpool/carpool information for employees. The company can also provide secure bicycle facilities and showers for those wishing to walk or bike to work. IN Expansion Traffic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 21 4) Traffic signal offsets and timings should be maintained in the corridor to improve coordination between signals. With these mitigation measures, the project will not cause unreasonable congestion on the surrounding highways. APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNTS PEAK HOUR AND DESIGN HOUR ADJUSTMENTS 11/12/98 09:02 '&8028283983 SOV TRANS PLANN L�ji.Uub SETCON TECHNOLOGIES IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 8/29/1994 Qation: 7-24.41 BURLINGTON Starts : 06/14/94 at 06:00:00 Y HOME AVE,& BACON COURT Ends : 06/14/94 at 12:00:00 Notes OS ' Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Study ID: MERG 00048 Operator: SEUNNB & CHRIS B. SIN : 108 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather Correction: 1.00 �*�**�**�r�**��*�,��*�*�*��r***��*�*�**�t�***>t��****��*�� US 7 FROM ALT US 7 US 7 FROM S.BURLINGTON BACON CT FR BEN FRANKLIN HOME AVE FROM S-CREST DR ----------------------- RtRed d Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right e _ _ -- _ Tue 6/14/1994 2 58 10 7 34 < 6:00 Pass Car 1 5 190 6 1 224 357 6 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Kd Truck 0 1 11 0 0 2 25 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 ALL 1 6 205 6 1 226 390 6 2 5 1 3 59 .7 34 % 0.1 0.6 21.3 0.6 0.1 23.5 40-5 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.3 6.1 1.1 0.7 3.5 1 0 13 554 15 0 300 964 4 5 20 8 8 110 35 5 69 < 7:DO Pass Car 0 0 1 1 0 4 Nd Truck 0 0 20 1 0 11 28 0 1 2 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALL 0 13 582 16 0 312 1001 6 6 22 8 8 111 36 5 74 % 0.0 0.6 26.5 0.7 0.0 14.2 45.5 0.3 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 5.0 1.6 0.2 3.4 8:00 Pass Car 1 20 573 18 0 229 1090 8 11 19 8 10 102 33 122 355 < Kd Truck 0 0 ZO 0 0 6 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 1 16 0f 0 0 0 0 Alt 1 20 601 18 0 Z36 1128 8 12 22 9 14 106 34 12 41 % 0.0 0.9 26.6 0.8 0.0 10.4 49.9 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 4.7 1.5 0.5 1.8 9:00 Pass Car 0 49 525 19 1 121 709 5 10 13 7 14 54 28 18 44 < Md Truck 0 0 22 0 0 7 34 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 ALL 0 49 555 19 1 130 T56 7 10 13 7 14 57 29 18 47 % 0.0 Z.9 32.4 1.1 0.1 7.6 44.2 0.4 0-6 0.8 0.4 0.8 3-3 1.7 1.1 2.7 10:00 Pass Car 1 63 5Z8 15 0 123 768 7 16 23 22 21 63 17 25 53 < � 2 1 0 3 Md Truck 0 1 35 2 0 5 30 2 1 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 16 0 0 2 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 ALL 1 65 579 17 o 13o 806 11 17 26 22 21 65 18 25 58 X 0.1 3.5 31.1 0.9 0.0 7.0 43.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.2 1.1 3.5 1.0 1.3 3.1 11:00 Pass Car 1 77 626 16 0 159 785 7 22 39 16 35 73 26 28 53 < Md Truck 0 2 29 0 0 7 23 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 20 0 0 3 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Alt 1 79 675 16 0 169 819 7 Z3 42 16 35 74 28 Z8 54 % 0.0 3.8 32.7 0.8 0.0 8.2 39.6 0.3 1.1 2.0 0.8 1.7 3.6 1.4 1.4 Z.6 d 11/12/98 09:04 V8028283983 SOV TRANS PLANN IgUU6 (:_6 I SETCON TECHNOLOGIES h IDEAS REPORT 'TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three vehicle Analysis with Right an Red Date: 8/29/1. _ooation: 7-24.41 BURLINGTON Starts : 06/13/94 at 12:00-0I Notes : US 7,HOME AVE,& BACON COURT Ends : 06/13/94 at 18:00 Study ID: MERG 00047 Interval : 15 rain Intervals: 24 Operator: JEN B. & CHRIS B. SIN : 108 Type: C,N1dT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : SUNNY Correction: 1.00 sk�>ti�ie�'kde�iY:9e��le:ir4r�kzEie*�3riri:�kirde'�Y��E�k� �e��ieir*'lt�t�N��eiedrds�ra�t:kslr��fir3e*',k�kieic�i*�eaft�Y�eaF�kitir�is*yY�:c'stt.lt US 7 FROM ALI US 7 US 7 FROM S.BURLINGTON BACON CT FR BEN FRANKLIN HOME AVE FROM S.CREST DR ----------------------- Begi n RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mors 6/13/1994 12:00 Pass car 0 80 730 20 0 81 397 2 16 25 29 41 2 13 30 32 14< Md Truck 0 0 20 3 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Alt 0 60 760 23 0 82 411 2 16 26 29 41 13 30 332 151 X 0.0 4.7 44.9 1.4 0.0 4.8 24-2 0.1 0.9 1.5 1.7 2.4 0.8 1.8 1.9 8.9 13:00 Pass car 0 69 654 27 0 176 852 12 11 24 13 22 66 34 33 92 < Md Truck 0 3 26 0 0 4 21 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 My Truck 0 0 14 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALL 0 72 694 27 0 ISO 880 12 11 25 13 22 67 34 33 94 % 0.0 3.3 32.1 1.2 0.0 8.3 40.7 0.6 0.5 1.2 0.6 1.0 3.1 1.6 1.5 4.3 14a00 Pass car 0 59 671 16 0 155 824 8 5 27 13 16 93 28 27 92 < Md Truck 0 0 25 2 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 My Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 AtL 0 59 704 18 0 159 553 9 5 28 13 17 96 28 27 93 % 0.0 Z.8 33.4 0.9 C.0 7.5 40.4 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.6 0.8 4.6 1.3 1.3 4.4 15:00 Pass car 1 78 692 16 0 193 846 8 15 24 26 35 137 28 26 87 < Md Truck 0 Z 20 0 0 6 18 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALL 1 80 722 16 0 199 881 9 15 25 26 35 138 28 26 88 0.0 3.5 31.5 0.7 0.0 3.7 38.5 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.5 6.0 1.2 1.1 3.8 16:00 Pass Car 1 91 898 19 1 226 1001 12 9 25 20 28 135 340 36 174 < I Md Truck 0 1 11 2 0 2 18 1 0 1 2 0 i By Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ALL 1 92 915 21 1 228 1026 15 9 27 22 28 137 39 36 176 I % 0.0 3.3 33.0 0.3 0.0 8.2 37.0 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.5 1.0 4.9 1.4 1.3 6.3 17:00 Pass tar 0 105 903 13 0 232 1043 10 5 19 17 39 155 23 45 167 < Md Truck 0 0 16 1 0 2 9 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 I My Truck 0 0 5 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALL 0 105 924 14 0 235 1061 10 5 21 17 39 157 23 45 167 % 0.0 3.7 32.7 0.5 0.0 5.3 37.6 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.4 5.6 0.8 1.6 5.9 fZ ; coo --�:35 SoJ'l �' �� vf- �� S'/ c✓s yei �'ov,UTi�fl i 11/12/98 09:00 Z%8028283983 SOV TRANS PLANK Lgj OOz SETCON TECHNOLOGIES IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page; 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 8/29/1994 k it u >E' st •* fe fe :k iE ie � ie sir �ir:k:ir :le 4e *:Ar ik ie 9k :k � 4e :k #c # �Ic * k �c * :k � it # �Y ie * * it ii is de �k it �4 ie ie it 'k'k st tk t't �k fc � 9t 7r �k'fe'k � *'� '� * fr �k � * *'1: >tC' --cation: 7-24.4 BURLINGTON Starts : 06/14/94 at 06:00:00 Notes : US 7,SHELBURNE RD PLAZA,& OUTLET CENTER Ends : 06/14/94 at 12:00:00 Study ID: MERG 00046 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: DEB S. & MARY J. SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : SUNNY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM ALT US 7 US 7 FROM S.BURLLNGTON OUTLET CENTER DRIVE SHELBURNE RO PLAZA DRIVE ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Begin, Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right ----------------------------------------------------_-----------------------_-_--- Tue 6/14/1994 6:00 Pass Car 0 1 326 19 0 18 602 19 0 7 1 3 0 10 1 16 < Nd Truck 0 0 15 1 0 5 32 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 All 0 1 345 20 0 23 642 22 0 9 1 3 0 10 1 16 % 0.0 0.1 31.6 1.8 0.0 2.1 58.7 2.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.1 1.5 7:00 Pass Car 0 2 757 52 0 29 1257 65 0 9 3 11 0 15 2 41 < Nd Truck 0 0 26 3 0 2 31 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 All 0 2 791 55 0 31 1303 68 0 9 4 11 0 15 4 43 % 0.0 0.1 33.9 2.4 0.0 1.3 55.8 2.9 0.0 0.4 0-2 0.5 0.0 0.6 O.2 1.8 8:00 Pass car 0 5 756 50 0 42 1300 92 0 32 d 16 0 23 8 43 < Nd Truck 0 0 37 2 �..` 0 3 32 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 5~! Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All 0 5 802 52 0 45 1345 93 0 34 9 18 0 24 9 48 0.0 0.2 32.3 2.1 0.0 1.8 54.1 3.7 0.0 1.4 0.4 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.4 1.9 9:00 Pass Car 0 6 579 113 0 101 833 125 0 49 9 21 0 61 8 86 < Pod Truck 0 0 25 2 0 1 40 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 Hy Truck D 1 11 0 0 1 17 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 Alt 0 7 615 115 0 103 890 129 0 51 9 22 0 65 9 89 % 0.0 0.3 29.2 5.5 0.0 4.9 42.3 6.1 0.0 2.4 0.4 1.0 O.0 3.1 0.4 4.2 10:00 Pass car 0 12 601 133 0 127 787 173 0 100 22 19 0 99 29 204 < f 9d Truck 0 0 36 6 0 1 33 7 0 7 1 0 0 4 2 1 Hy Truck 0 0 17 0 0 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Alt 0 12 654 139 0 128 831 182 0 107 23 19 0 104 31 206 % 0.0 0.5 26.8 5.7 0.0 5.3 34.1 7.5 0.0 4.4 0.9 0.8 0.0 4.3 1-3 8.5 11:00 Pass tar 0 24 705 165 0 115 757 166 0 156 32 54 0 134 37 238 < Md Truck 0 0 35 1 0 1 19 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 3 Hy Truck 0 0 18 3 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 Alt 0 24 758 169 0 120 786 166 0 160 32 54 0 137 38 243 z 0.0 0.9 28.2 6.3 0.0 4.5 29.3 6.2 0.0 6.0 1.2 2.0 0.0 5.1 1.4 9.0 11/12/98 09:01 a°8028283983 SOV TRANS PLANK C UU4 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 8/29/199, -ication: 7-24.4 BURLINGTON Starts : 06/13/94 at 12:00:0( Notes : US 7,SHELBURNE RD PLAZA,& OUTLET CENTER Ends : 06/13/94 at 1S:00:0( Study ID: MERG 00045 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: DEB S & MARY J SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : PARTLY CLOUDY & WARM Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM ALT US 7 US 7 FROM S.BURLINGTON OUTLET CENTER DRIVE SHELBURNE RD PLAZA DRIVE -------------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Begins Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mon 6/13/1994 12:00 Pass Car 0 20 810 185 0 159 1020 203 0 156 26 19 0 166 40 273 < Md Truck 0 0 24 0 0 0 26 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 4 tly Truck 0 0 9 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Alt 0 20 843 185 0 160 1057 204 0 157 26 20 0 168 43 278 % 0.0 0.6 26.7 5.9 0.0 5.1 33.4 6.5 0.0 5.0 0.8 0-6 0.0 5.3 1.4 8.8 13:00 Pass Car 0 18 673 131 0 122 797 149 0 159 27 16 0 106 23 187 < Md Truck 0 0 26 1 0 1 24 3 a 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hy Truck 0 0 15 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ALL 0 18 714 132 0 124 826 152 0 162 U 16 0 106 23 189 % 0.0 0.7 23.7 5.3 0.0 5.0 33.2 6.1 0.0 6.5 1.1 0.6 0.0 4.3 C.9 7.6 14:00 Pass Car 0 10 663 117 0 110 B58 177 0 116 33 10 0 105 51 203 < Md Truck 0 0 25 0 0 0 32 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 All 0 10 694 118 0 110 894 177 0 118 33 10 0 107 51 208 X 0.0 0.4 27.4 4.7 0.0 4.3 35.3 7.0 0.0 4.7 1.3 0.4 0.0 4.2 2.0 8-2 15:00 Pass Car 0 18 840 154 0 104 998 206 0 139 33 26 0 _ 97 43 185 < Md Truck 0 0 18 1 0 1 35 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 12 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alt 0 18 870 155 0 106 1043 207 0 142 34 26 0 97 43 185 % 0.0 0.6 29.7 5.3 0.0 3.6 35.6 7.1 0.0 4.9 1.2 0.9 0.0 3.3 1.5 6.3 16:00 Pass Car 0 16 1050 179 0 125 1150 206 0 200 31 30 0 186 26 273 < Md Truck C 0 12 1 0 1 23 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 Hy Truck 0 0 11 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALL 0 16 10T3 180 0 127 1179 208 0 202 31 30 0 187 26 277 X 0.0 0.5 30.3 5.1 0.0 3.6 33.3 5.9 0.0 5.7 0.9 0.8 0.0 5.3 0.7 7.8 17:00 Pass Car 0 9 1135 154 0 159 1161 793 0 227 24 51 0 173 32 293 < Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 1T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ALL 0 9 1155 154 0 159 1184 193 0 227 24 51 0 173 33 294 % 0.0 0.2 31.6 4.2 0.0 4.3 32.4 5.3 0.0 6.2 0.7 1.4 0.0 4.7 0.9 8.0 09/,17/98 16:40 V802 879 3610 CCRPC 19008 CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING cOMMISSION AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMAP.Y OBSERVER: CB,CW,SG DATE: 713196 DAY: WEDNESDAY INTERSECTION Or: 1-189 EXIT & US 7 (c@SEARS) CEn: SOUTH BURLINGTON STATION NUMBER: SOER-081 REVIEWED BY- ROAD NAMES NORTHBOUND: US 7 SOUTHBOUND: US 7 ` EASTBOUND: NIA WESTBOUND: I-189 (EXIT) TWO HOUR VOLUME SUMMARY SEAR TIME 715 730 745 800 ''15 t3o 845 900 Total All 637 805 1000 808 769 77-6 650 572 Total 0 1269 0 13 0 1632 0 42 0 0 0 0 1222 67 1777 81 5967 PEAK HOUR 15-MINUTE VOLUMES k"k, 4 730 745 800 815 NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND _ R S L TR R S L TR R S L TP R S L TR o 0 117 0 2 0 154 0 1 0 0 0 0 138 9 219 8 0 185 0 1 0 195 0 3 0 0 0 0 172 8 245 13 0 191 0 2 0 241 0 8 0 0 0 0 242 7 319 9 0 159 0 1 0 232 0 6 0 0 0 0 170 4 243 10 0 162 0 3 1 0 223 0 7 0 0 0 0 172 6 206 14 0 182 0 3 0 224 0 s 0 11 0 0 121 11 188 16 0 147 0 0 0 174 0 7 0 0 0 0 118 10 201 11 0 126 0 1 0 189 0 4 0 0 0 0 89 12 156 10 NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR 0 185 0 1 0 195 0 3 0 0 0 0 172 8 245 13 0 191 0 2 0 241 0 8 0 0 0 0 242 7 319 9 0 159 0 1 0 232 0 6 0 0 0 0 170 4 243 10 0 162 0 3 0 223 0 7 0 0 0 0 172 6 206 14 APPROACH MOVEMENT ��0-830 I TRUCKS PHF PEAK HOUR SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND R g L 0 697 0 R S L 0 891 0 I R S L 0 0 0 R 5 L 756 25 1013 1.00 °e'o 2-69 % - 0 11/0 2.55 % 0.91 0.92 NIA 0.79 Peak Hr. Total 3382 09I17/98 16:41 V802 679 3610 CCRPC z 009 CHITTENDEN COUNTY P.EGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY CB CW SG DATE 7J3196 OBS--RVER. INTERSECTION OF: , t 1-189 EXIT & US 7 (@SEARS) CITY: SOUTH BURLINGTON STATION NUMBER: SOBR-081 ROAD NAMES NORTHBOUND: US 7 SOUTHBOUND: US 7 EASTBOUND: NIA WESTBOUND: I-189 (EXIT) STAR TIME 1600 1615 1630 1645 100 i715 1730 1745 TWO HOUR VOLUME SUMMARY DAY: W—EDNESDAY RE'OEWED BY: .jr5 9 N©RTHBOUND SOUTYSQUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total R S L TR R S L TR R 0 S 0 L 0 TR 0 R S L TR All 173 26 217 9 10 1140 807 0 V4 0 4 0 500 0 5 0 167 0 1 0 312 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 147 23 32 164 22-4 4 1094 0 210 0 1 2 0 0 481 429 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 149 32 196 9 1034 0 0 223 206 0 0 0 0 457 0 2 0 0 0 0 181 35 198 9 1077 0 236 0 0 0 435 0 3 0 0 0 0 196 27 205 222 4 10 1099 1011 Q 233 0 1 0 361 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 135 31 23 181 6 83Q 0 171 0 2 0 32`� 0 3 0 Q 12$6 �a4 1 fi07 61 5101 Total 0 1675 0 11 0 3304 0 25 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 15-MINUTE VOLUMES TIME 1630 1645 1700 1715 NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUNQ WT=STBOUND R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR 0 210 0 1 0 481 0 3 0 0 0 0 147 32 224 4 0 228 0 2 0 429 0 3 0 0 0 0 149 32 195 9 0 206 0 0 0 457 0 2 0 0 0 0 181 35 198 9 0 236 0 0 0 435 0 3 0 0 0 0 195 27 205 4 APPROACH MO VEMEN1 '"3C-1730 TRUCKS PHF PEAK HOUR SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SoUTHBOUND EASTBOUNDWESTE30UND R S L R S L R 5 L R S L 0 880 0 0 1802 0 0 0 0 673 126 $23 0.34 °f® 0.61 °,o Q "in 1.6 % 0.93 0.94 NIA 0.95 Peak Hr. Total 4304 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES (IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/19e L,jcation: 7-24.38 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 03/20/98 at 06:00:: (Notes : US 7,SWIFT ST, & I-189 RAMP EInteON) 15ds .Int/200/98 a2412:00:( Study ID: MERG 00012 H T Operator: M. HERSEY & G. JONES SIN 0 Type: C �P-rt red MdT Y / (Weather : COLD & OVERCAST Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE SWIFT ST FROM SPEAR ST I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------- I Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fri 3/20/1998 6:00 Pass Car 0 12 95 33 0 0 58 6 1 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 6 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 1 0 I 6:15 Pass Car 0 16 97 34 0 0 130 6 2 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 7 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 I 6:30 Pass Car 0 27 185 61 1 0 175 9 3 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 0 1 I 6:45 Pass Car 0 40 188 75 2 0 195 16 4 14 0 17 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 2 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L T- 7-- L 1- i— L T (Z_ 0 0 0 < :00 Pass Car 0 36 201 75 1 0 215 18 5 18 0 29 0 Md Truck 0 1 6 1 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 Pass Car 0 30 255 105 4 0 275 22 4 18 0 49 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 13 2 0 0 10 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 I7:30 Pass Car 0 37 327 115 1 0 292 28 7 32 0 51 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 4 14 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 Pass Car 0 58 375 126 6 0 315 33 ±3 39 0 79 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 11 0 0 0 5 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 8:00 Pass Car 0 44 345 111 3 0 301 40 7 54 0 64 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 4 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 IHy Truck 0 1 4 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 Pass Car 0 35 286 116 6 0 298 18 44 0 38 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 0 1 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 I Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1c ration: 7-24.38 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 03/20/98 at 06:00.J( i,,.,ces : US 7,SWIFT ST, & I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) Ends : 03/20/98 at 12-00-PI Study ID• MERG 00012 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: M. HERSEY & G. JONES SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re Weather : COLD & OVERCAST Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE SWIFT ST FROM SPEAR ST I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right — — — — - I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fri 3/20/1998 < Z 8:30 Pass Car 0 16 244 85 4 0 291 20 2 15 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 8 7 0 0 4 1 I Hy Truck 0 0 5 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 Pass Car 0 33 287 97 2 0 283 25 4 34 0 37 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 12 5 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 00 00 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 2 9:00 Pass Car 0 25 217 93 7 0 239 20 1 24 0 35 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 3 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 9:15 Pass Car 0 19 246 72 6 0 220 17 6 20 0 33 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 10 3 0 0 10 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 00 00 I Hy Truck 0 0 8 2 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 0 - 9:30 Pass Car 0 21 203 79 3 0 248 16 3 23 0 34 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 8 1 0 0 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 8 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Peds 0 0 2 9:45 Pass Car 0 28 211 77 6 0 252 34 6 29 0 34 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 1 7 6 0 0 12 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 < I 10:00 Pass Car 0 29 203 87 3 0 232 25 2 35 0 36 0 p 0 0 Md Truck 0 1 10 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 Pass Car 0 38 228 87 3 0 256 25 3 26 0 30 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 3 11 6 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 I < 10:30 Pass Car 0 24 228 103 2 0 248 24 0 13 0 40 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 1 7 7 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 2 I Peds 0 0 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 31 222 106 2 0 272 13 4 33 0 42 0 0 0 0 < 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 Md Truck 0 2 12 b 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 5 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 I 11:00 Pass Car 0 33 265 107 4 0 292 32 0 29 0 31 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 2 7 2 0 0 8 0 0 0 p 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 8 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 ration: 7-24.38 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts 03/17/98 at 12:00:0 Notes : US 7,SWIFT ST, & I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) Ends . 03/17/98 at 18:00:0 Study ID• MERG 00003 Interval 15 min Type: Intervals: 24 C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Operator: M.HERSEY & G.JONES SIN : 0 Weather : SUNNY & COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE SWIFT ST FROM SPEAR ST 1-189 RAMP E(WB ON) ---- Begins RtRed ---------------------------------------------- ---- ------- Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left ------- Thru Right -------------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right Tue 3/17/1998 14.30 Pass Car 0 37 263 125 0 0 303 29 3 32 0 49 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 1 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IHy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 Pass Car 0 43 299 148 2 0 313 39 3 33 0 56 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 1 9 6 0 0 13 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 11 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Pecs 15:00 Pass Car 3 0 52 283 154 4 0 328 0 28 2 33 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 11 6 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f Hy Truck 0 2 4 2 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 15:15 Pass Car 0 0 31 268 154 0 0 390 0 24 2 47 1 0 59 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 7 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 Pass Car 0 41 320 169 0 0 365 33 3 38 0 72 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 I Md Truck 0 0 7 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 Pass Car 0 29 275 154 3 0 360 20 0 38 0 63 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 Md Truck I 0 1 10 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 Peds 16:00 Pass Car 0 0 43 286 197 3 0 383 0 36 2 25 2 0 53 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 7 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 16.15 Pass Car 0 0 42 323 204 1 0 364 0 29 4 32 1 0 66 0 0 0 0 < 0 I j Md Truck 0 3 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Peds 16:30 Pass Car 0 0 41 304 203 1 0 416 0 32 2 58 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 < 0 Md Truck 0 1 2 7 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 { I Peds 16:45 Pass Car 0 0 56 362 195 1 0 360 0 48 4 50 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 < 0 Md Truck 0 2 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 Pass Car 0 28 402 308 2 0 481 35 1 53 0 107 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 1 7 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 2 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 05 19 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10 / ration: 7-24.38 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 03/17/98 at 12:00_A N,;Les • US 7,SWIFT ST, & I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) Ends . 03/17/98 at 18:00:0( Study ID: MERG 00003 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 C MdT,H T,P-rt/rep Operator: M.HERSEY & G.JONES SIN : 0 Type:y Weather : SUNNY & COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE SWIFT ST FROM SPEAR ST I-189 RAMP E(WB ON) !I ---------------------------------------------- -------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right — — — — — Tue 3/17/1998 < 17:15 Pass Car 0 46 481 272 1 0 451 44 2 45 0 93 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 11 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Peds 0 0 17:30 Pass car 0 54 376 222 0 0 385 44 0 46 0 59 0 0 0 0 < 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 2 1 0 0 5 1 p 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 Peds 0 0 1 17:45 Pass Car 0 35 357 137 1 0 345 27 3 39 0 58 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 2 Peds 0 0 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES (IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 (—cation: 7-24.36(A) SO.BURLINGTON Starts : 04/26/96 at 06:00:0 Notes : US 7 & QUEEN CITY PARKWAY RAMPnG(OFF) 15 min .I04/26/96 a2412:00:0 Study ID: MERG 00006 Operator: GEORGE JONES SIN : 27 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red (Weather : COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE From East Q.C.P. FROM PINE ST ----------------------------------- --- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------------------------------------------------ Fri 4/26/1996 6:00 Pass Car 0 0 85 13 0 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 < {I Md Truck 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 6:15 Pass Car 0 0 80 4 0 3 97 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 0 4 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 6:30 Pass Car 0 0 105 11 0 6 140 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 Pass Car 0 0 166 32 0 11 167 0 0 0 0 0 7 18 0 5 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 I Peds 0 1 0 0 :00 Pass Car 0 0 182 22 0 6 180 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 0 7 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 7:15 Pass Car 0 0 219 21 0 9 195 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 5 < Md Truck 0 0 9 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 44 0 0 09 0 0 0 0 0 � `�0 00 0 7:30 Pass Car 0 0 25 29 0 15 254 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 0 13 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hy Truck 0 0 `5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds \ 2 R L T Q 0 7:45 Pass Car 0 0 343 40 0 24 347 0 0 0 0 0 9 19 0 25 < Md Truck 0 0 12 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 0 2 8:00 Pass Car 0 0 321 27 0 15 286 0 0 0 0 0 9 30 0 11 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 IHy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8:15 Pass Car 0 0 287 22 0 11 265 0 0 0 0 0 7 20 0 13 < Md Truck 0 0 14 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Peds 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 1,05 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Bate: 10 / / ration: 7-24.36(A) SO.BURLINGTON Starts : 04/26/96 at 06:00.J( i.,,tes : US 7 & QUEEN CITY PARKWAY RAMP G(OFF) Ends : 04/26/96 at 12:00'0(I Study ID: MERG 00006 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 S t/re N : 27 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-r Operator: GEORGE JONES / Weather : COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE From East Q.C.P. FROM PINE ST ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right — — — — -------------------- t Fri 4/26/1996 2< I 8:30 Pass Car 0 0 236 18 0 10 277 0 0 0 0 0 8 22 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 12 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peds 1 0 0 8:45 Pass Car 0 0 223 8 0 6 287 0 0 0 0 0 6 18 0 13 < Md Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 2 Peds 0 0 9:00 Pass Car 0 0 270 10 0 7 261 0 0 0 0 0 5 19 0 17 < Md Truck 0 0 14 3 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 0 9:15 Pass Car 0 0 224 20 0 2 239 0 0 0 0 0 3 18 0 15 < Md Truck 0 0 15 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 Peds 0 0 0 9:30 Pass Car 0 0 217 20 0 6 247 0 0 0 0 0 10 18 0 21 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 3 9:45 Pass Car 0 0 250 10 0 3 276 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 0 24 < I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 Pass Car 0 0 285 18 0 5 314 0 0 0 0 0 1 22 0 15 < 0 0 0 1 Md Truck 0 0 10 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Peds 1 0 0 10:15 Pass Car 0 0 256 14 0 4 275 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 00 155 < Md Truck 0 0 12 2 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 4 1 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 2 Peds 2 0 I 6 19 0 16 < 10:30 Pass Car 0 0 279 11 0 8 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Md Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 2 Peds 3 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 0 285 15 0 4 310 0 0 0 0 0 6 26 0 12 < Md Truck 0 0 21 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 11 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 00 D 1 0 Peds 5 0 11:00 Pass Car 0 0 283 17 0 6 334 0 0 0 0 0 5 25 00 100 < Md Truck 0 0 13 2 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 1 0 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 ation: 7-24.36(A) SO.BURLINGTON Starts : 04/25/96 at 12:00:0 Nuces : US 7 & QUEEN CITY PARKWAY RAMP G(OFF) Ends : 04/25/96 at 18:00:0 Study ID• MERG 00005 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator• GEORGE JONES SIN : 27 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE From East Q.C.P. FROM PINE ST ------------------------------------------------------ ------ Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Thu 4/25/1996 14:30 Pass Car 0 0 267 21 0 6 330 0 0 0 0 0 10 32 0 17 < Md Truck 0 0 14 1 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 3 0 0 2 14:45 Pass Car 0 0 313 22 0 8 387 0 0 0 0 0 2 27 0 27 < I Md Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Pecs 0 0 0 1 15:00 Pass Car 0 0 308 24 0 7 374 0 0 0 0 0 7 47 0 24 < I Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Pecs 2 0 0 2 15:15 Pass Car 0 0 317 23 0 7 372 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 18 < ( Md Truck 0 0 10 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 f Hy Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 Pass Car 0 0 326 23 0 9 368 0 0 0 0 0 3 68 0 38 < I Md Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 15:45 Pass Car 0 0 30B 23 0 6 376 0 0 0 0 0 11 36 0 11 < Md Truck 0 0 6 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 f 16:00 Pass Car 0 0 308 18 0 6 362 0 0 0 0 0 5 58 0 32 < I Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 2 I 16:15 Pass Car 0 0 308 23 0 12 437 0 0 0 0 0 2 55 0 24 < Md Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hy Truck 0 0 14 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 2 0 0 3 I 16:30 Pass Car 0 0 304 15 0 13 393 0 0 0 0 0 8 40 0 15 < Md Truck 0 0 17 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I Peds 0 0 0 3 16:45 Pass Car 0 0 369 30 0 9 400 0 0 0 0 0 5 50 0 25 < Md Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I17:00 Pass Car 0 0 369 28 0 4 346 0 0 0 0 0 7 74 0 20 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 2 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 105 Date: 10 / / Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Starts : 04/25/96 at 12:00.J ration: 7-24.36(A) SO.BURLINGTON PARKWAY RAMP G(OFF) Ends : 04/25/96 at 18:00•0 1,,.,7-es : US 7 & QUEEN CITY Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 I Study ID: MERG 00005 S / N : 27 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-r t/re. Operator: GEORGE JONES SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 Weather : US 7 FROM BURLINGTON US 7 FROM SHELBURNE From East W.C.P. FROM PINE ST ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right — Begins — — — Thu 4/25/1996 0 0 349 15 0 12 480 0 0 0 0 0 12 56 0 35 < 17:15 Pass Car 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 1 0 4 I Peds 0 17:30 Pass Car 0 0 372 28 0 0 7 412 0 0 0 0 0 2 48 0 24 < 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 17:45 Pass Car 0 0 328 23 1 0 6 355 0 0 0 0 0 9 31 0 19 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 09/17/98 16:38 `$802 879 3610 CCRPC 19002 CHITTENDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY OBSERVER: Jesse and Chantal DATE 716195 DAY: Thursday INTERSECTION OF Pt. 7 and Brewer Parkway (K-mart) CITY: South Burlington STATION NUMBER S5-3 CHECKED BY: ROAD NAME: NORTHBOUND: RL 7 towards Burlington SOUTHBOUND: RL 7 towards Shelburne EASTBOUND: Brewer pkwy towards bank WESTBOUND: Brewer pkwy towards K-mart TWO HOUR VOLUME SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND Total START TIME R S L T R R S L TR R 5 L TR R S L TR All 700 4 186 6 13 9 225 0 10 36 0 0 2 6 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 475 555 715 1 248 16 9 4 252 1 14 24 1 3 i 1 6 0 2 0 670 730 0 269 12 8 4 342 6 10 28 0 40 1 1 3 0 3 0 4 1 813 745 5 314 20 15 8 412 3 18 0 3 1 6 1 3 0 777 800 1 297 20 13 10 396 6 14 1 14 34 29 1 5 3 12 2 1 1 701 815 4 297 22 17 14 313 21 14 6 286 3 12 35 1 6 0 10 0 4 0 567 830 4 845 3 I 291 306 29 10 18 290 9 7 39 2 9 0 5 2 4 0 717 PEAK HOUR 15-MINUTE VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SO,UTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TIME R i S L TR R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR 730 0 269 12 8 4 342 5 10 28 0 1 1 6 3 0 0 2 4 0 1 745 5 314 20 15 8 412 3 18 40 1 3 0 1 6 1 3 0 800 1 297 20 13 10 396 6 14 34 0 3 5 3 12 2 1 1 815 4 297 22 17 14 313 1 14 29 1 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND) WESTBOUND APPROACH MOVEMENT R S L R S L R. S L R 5 L 30-$30 10 1177 74 36 1463 15 131 2 12 27 3 10 TRUCKS 42 3.7 0.9 3.45 0.82 - 5 0.67 PHF 0.93 09/17/98 16:38 0402 879 3610 CCRPC 16003 HI f t NDEN COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY OBSERVER: Jesse and Chantal DATE: 7106195 DAY: Thumssday INTERSECTION OF: Rt. 7 and Brewer Parkway (K-mart) CITY: South Burlington STATION NUMBER: SB-3 REVIEW!=rJ BY: ROAD NAME: \ Y /6 NORTHBOUND: Rt 7 towards Buffington Checked 5114 s J SOUTHBOUND: Rt. 7 towards Shelburne EASTBOUND Brewer pkwy towa,ds bank WESTBOUND: Brewer pkwy towards K-mart TWO H©UR VOLUME SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND T®tal START TIME R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR R S ► TR All 1500 9 367 36 14 27 315 7 18 54 2 35 a 11 0 3 0 0 867 818 1615 10 366 41 10 22 289 5 11 35 3 29 0 2 11 11 4 4 3 8 0 864 1630 9 368 39 11 22 305 12 10 55 4 27 15 3 5 0 872 1645 8 374 37 5 19 333 12 7 39 3 24 0 14 1 0 0 913 700 2 416 48. 4 22 332 11 9 46 2 19 0 2 0 936 1715 3 415 43 6 21 3553 7 4 48 2 33 0 7 2 7 0 791 1730 5 353 30 5 7 291 9 7 54 6 23 1 2 4 1 0 790 1745 4 366 35 3 20 299 4 2 40 a 18 a 3 0 PEAK HOUR 15-MINUTE VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND TIME R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR R S L TR 1630 9 368 39 11 22 305 12 10 55 4 27 2 11 4 8 0 0 1545 8 374 37 5 19 333 12 7 39 3 24 0 15 3 5 0 1700 2 416 48 4 22 332 11 9 46 2 19 0 14 1 0 2 0 1715 3 415 43 6 21 353 7 4 48 2 33 0 7 2 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND VVESTSOUND APPROACH MOVEMEN R S L R S L R S L R S L 330-1730 22 1573 167 84 1323 42 188 11 103 47 10 15 TOT: 3585 TRUCKS 1.45 % 2-07 *A 0.66 % 0.00 FHF 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.78 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES I IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/19'. 7-24.3 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 03/05/98 at 06:00:1 IL,;cation: Notes : US 7 & HANNAFORDS DRIVE Ends : 03/05/98 at 12:00:1 Study ID• MERG 00006 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: A. PORTER & C. PHILBROOK SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 IWeather US 7 FROM 189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE LAUREL HLL DR FR OAK HLL HANNAFORDS/BURGER KING ------------- ----------------- Begins RtRed Left ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Thu 3/05/1998 3 1 51 6 0 2 75 0 0 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 < I 6:00 Pass Car 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 6:15 Pass Car 0 1 102 4 0 1 114 3 4 0 0 2 1 4 0 2 < ! Md Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 2 0 6:30 Pass Car 0 0 156 8 0 3 168 3 12 2 1 1 1 14 1 2 < Md Truck 0 0 6 3 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 6:45 Pass Car 2 1 201 8 0 1 164 4 10 6 0 3 3 7 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs :00 Pass Car 2 1 193 0 7 1 5 211 0 4 13 8 0 1 6 1 15 1 1 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 Pass Car 4 7 242 19 0 6 229 1 15 8 1 10 0 21 0 5 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 12 1 0 1 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 2 }�j 0 0 0 0 iR; 0 0 Y� 0 0 0 0 0 1 I Peds 8 13 6 0 13 C 0 10 294 6 15 11 0 10 2 27 3 6 < 7:30 Pass Car 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 I 7:45 Pass Car 9 14 374 20 1 3 301 6 26 5 0 14 4 31 0 4 < 0 Md Truck 0 1 14 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Peds 8:00 Pass Car 5 10 423 0 18 0 4 286 0 8 16 13 1 1 5 1 24 2 0 12 < Md Truck 0 0 16 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Peds 8:15 Pass Car 5 10 279 0 15 0 3 265 0 6 12 6 0 1 6 1 30 0 1 6 < Md Truck 0 3 9 1 0 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1' ration: 7-24.3 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 03/05/98 at 06:00.J ,,motes : US 7 & HANNAFORDS DRIVE Ends : 03/05/98 at 12:00-0� Study ID: MERG 00006 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: A. PORTER & C. PHILBROOK SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re• Weather : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE LAUREL HLL DR FR OAK HLL HANNAFORDS/BURGER KING ---------------------------------------------- ----- - Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------------ -- ---Z -- ----- I Thu 3/05/1998 1 29 8:30 Pass Car 2 8 260 12 0 10 230 10 8 4 3 b 4 < Md Truck 0 0 11 2 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 8:45 Pass Car 2 14 210 20 0 6 242 1 12 9 0 7 4 26 1 5 < Md Truck 1 0 19 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 9:00 Pass Car 8 6 196 17 0 13 210 2 8 2 1 8 4 23 8 8 < Md Truck 0 1 9 2 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 I Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 9:15 Pass Car 6 9 167 18 0 8 186 1 4 3 3 9 2 30 0 3 < Md Truck 0 1 16 0 0 1 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 Pass Car 2 18 181 20 0 11 183 5 6 4 1 7 3 32 1 2 < Md Truck 0 1 11 2 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 Pass Car 5 6 191 25 0 6 200 10 11 3 0 10 5 25 2 2 < Md Truck 0 0 14 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 10:00 Pass Car 7 11 160 27 0 10 163 6 3 5 1 10 1 26 1 10 < Md Truck 0 0 7 2 0 0 11 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 2 2 10:15 Pass Car 4 13 172 30 1 10 206 6 9 8 4 11 5 26 1 3 < Md Truck 0 0 16 3 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 Pass Car 6 10 194 38 0 12 183 2 5 4 3 7 10 30 4 10 < I Md Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 0 3 I 10:45 Pass Car 6 9 180 30 1 14 212 5 10 1 1 12 3 31 2 12 < Md Truck 0 0 20 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 I 11:00 Pass Car 12 10 199 31 0 10 217 8 1 6 0 6 15 31 4 6 < Md Truck 0 0 16 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 1 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/19� ration: 7-24.3 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts 03/04/98 at 12:00:( N,-jtes : US 7 & HANNAFORDS DRIVE Ends : 03/04/98 at 18:00:( Study ID: MERG 00005 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: A. PORTER & C. PHILBROOK SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE LAUREL HLL DR FR OAK HLL HANNAFORDS/BURGER KING ----------------------- Begins ------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ---------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right Wed 3/04/1998 14:30 Pass Car 8 12 227 45 0 7 262 6 3 3 2 23 5 43 1 17 < Md Truck 0 0 17 1 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 14:45 Pass Car 17 21 247 25 0 24 248 2 0 3 1 10 2 45 4 11 < Md Truck 0 0 17 1 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 15:00 Pass Car 15 20 229 26 0 19 249 12 2 5 3 14 5 45 4 13 < Md Truck 0 1 9 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 15:15 Pass Car 11 21 236 23 0 17 263 1 0 6 2 28 6 58 3 15 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 1 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 Pass Car 7 18 253 35 0 20 272 3 2 5 3 14 0 58 2 17 < I Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 1 0 15:45 Pass Car 2 21 238 37 0 16 293 3 0 4 6 10 1 40 2 19 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 Pass Car 5 29 238 53 0 23 311 6 0 2 1 17 4 46 4 18 < I Md Truck 0 0 2 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 0 2 I 16:15 Pass Car 7 18 251 37 0 15 288 3 0 6 3 29 7 44 1 24 < Md Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 16:30 Pass Car 8 22 276 53 0 18 308 1 0 10 2 18 6 44 5 23 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 Pass Car 12 27 275 42 0 20 315 0 0 4 2 7 3 57 8 26 < Md Truck 0 0 8 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 1 4 17:00 Pass Car 16 22 290 63 0 20 413 1 1 2 0 13 4 50 4 21 < Md Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IPeds I 0 0 0 1 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 Date: 10/05/1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Starts 03/04/98 at 12:0G.0 ration: 7-24.3 SOUTH BURLINGTON Ends 03/04/98 at 18:00 i,,motes : US 7 & HANNAFORDS DRIVE Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Study ID: MERG 00005 PORTER & C. PHILBROOK SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/rE Operator: A. Weather : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE LAUREL HLL DR FR OAK HLL HANNAFORDS/BURGER KING ----------------------- ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left ------------------- Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Begins -------------------------------------------------- --- -------- Wed 3/04/1998 9 24 334 56 0 20 308 2 0 4 1 18 2 50 4 18 < 17:15 Pass Car 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 1 Peds 0 17:30 Pass Car 9 20 301 59 0 19 1 314 2 0 3 2 18 6 53 7 17 < 0 1 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Peds 0 17:45 Pass Car 5 15 254 45 0 16 0 247 4 0 2 0 13 7 48 5 24 < 0 Md Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 Holmes Extension and Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont Wednesday September 28,1998 7:00 AN 7:15 AN 7:30 AN 7:45 AN 8:00 AN 8:15 AN 8:30 AN 8:45 AN 9:00 AN 9:15 AN 7:45 -8:45 peak EB-Holmes Ext. it t th t rt t WB-IDX Drive It t th t rt t NB -Shelburne Rd. It t th t rt t SB-Shelburne Rd. It t th t rt t 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 196 11 4 0 16 0 170 16 7 0 4 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 7 0 1 0 213 12 2 0 22 0 213 16 6 0 10 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 247 8 10 1 25 0 239 17 10 0 7 1 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 232 16 10 0 43 0 297 16 17 1 10 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 252 18 14 0 68 0 220 11 16 0 7 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 3 0 234 16 12 0 86 0 246 19 6 0 6 0 1 0 3 1 4 0 2 0 9 0 2 0 243 14 8 0 55 0 248 15 9 0 9 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 16 0 1 0 226 22 8 0 25 0 211 15 5 0 32 0 1 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 39 0 2 2 238 12 1 0 4 0 233 5 1 0 21 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 260 11 3 0 6 0 271 7 2 0 30 3 2 0 9 2 10 0 3 0 35 0 7 0 961 64 44 0 252 0 1011 61 48 1 33 2 11 10 3 1 35 7 1 1025 44 1 252 1 1072 49 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB total ialysis Hour % Trucksl 10.9% 0.0% 15.9% 14.5% 5.2/6 Analysis Hour PHF 0.97 Analysis Hour EB WB NO SO Volumes LT 33 10 7 252 TH 2 3 1025 1072 RT 11 35 44 49 2543 Enter 46 48 1076 1373 2543 Exit 299 58 1093 1046 2496 15 min hour total total 427 502 580 655 2164 622 2359 646 2503 620 2543 545 2433 578 2389 613 2356 2543 2543 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River junction Vermont 05001-2313 Holmes Extension and Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont Wednesday September 28, 1998 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 15 min hour total total 536 610 663 621 2430 659 2553 642 2585 796 2718 680 2777 578 2696 613 2667 4:30 -5:30 peak 126 1 18 0 32 1 52 0 0 0 226 0 4 1 1181 55 16 0 27 0 978 33 24 2 2777 2777 127 18 1 33 52 1 0 1 226 &771777T236 1 16 27 1 1011 1 26 EB-Holmes Ext. It t th t rt t WB-IDX Drive It t th t rt t NB -Shelburne Rd. It t th t rt t SB-Shelburne Rd. It t th t rt t 17 1 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 2 0 234 11 4 0 10 0 226 11 4 0 25 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 18 0 2 0 245 12 10 0 12 0 252 12 8 0 30 0 3 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 269 11 3 0 7 0 271 17 5 3 30 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 1 0 17 0 3 0 260 14 4 0 11 0 259 11 2 0 39 0 11 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 40 0 1 1 290 11 3 0 8 0 222 12 7 1 28 1 3 0 11 0 7 0 0 0 33 0 1 0 274 12 6 0 4 0 245 11 6 0 45 0 2 0 8 0 23 0 0 0 89 0 1 0 325 17 5 0 7 0 260 5 8 1 14 0 2 0 6 1 16 0 0 0 64 0 1 0 292 15 2 0 8 0 251 5 3 0 32 0 1 0 1 0 6 0 1 0 39 0 2 2 238 12 1 0 4 0 233 5 1 0 21 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 260 11 3 0 6 0 271 7 2 0 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB total lalysis Hour % Trucksl 1.1 % 10.0% 14.5% Analysis Hour PHF 0.87 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB Volumes LT 127 52 5 ' 2� TH 18 0 1236 1011 RT 33 226 16 26 2777 Enter 178 278 1257 1064 2777 Exit 43 49 1096 1321 2509 r T Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River )unction t" ? � Vermont 05001-2313 I SETCON TECHNOLOGIES IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 L-cation: 7-24.16 SO.BURLINGTON Starts 06/29/95 at 06:00:0 (Notes US 7,BARTLETT BAY AVE(TH 24),& TH 139 Ends 06/29/95 at 12:00:0 Study ID• ID # 00138 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: BEN GAGE SIN : 28 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red (Weather : SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM I-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE T139 FR AUTO DEALERSHIPS TH 24 FROM BRIGHAM RD ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------ Begins RtRed Left Thru IRight RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thu 6/29/1995 6:00 Pass Car 0 4 57 1 0 2 75 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 1 6:15 Pass Car 0 1 69 1 0 3 91 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 6:30 Pass Car 0 5 92 4 0 0 147 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 Pass Car 0 13 154 10 0 0 170 5 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 9 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 1 0 0 I 00 Pass Car 0 17 118 12 0 2 184 5 0 0 0 1 3 7 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I 7:15 Pass Car 1 20 166 12 1 5 213 7 4 1 0 0 1 8 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 7:30 Pass Car 1 37 190 13 0 4 242 17 6 2 0 0 1 9 1 2 < Md Truck 0 0 8 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Peds 0 1 0 0 7:45 Pass Car 1 37 218 15 7 5 240 10 1 3 1 5 3 10 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IHy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0_- 0 0 0 0 8:00 Pass Car 1 27 191 20 1 2 215 21 3 0 0 4 1 13 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 14 3 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 1 .... Peds 1 1 0 8:15 Pass Car 1 25 164 12 1 5 216 11 5 2 1 3 2 15 1 0 < Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 7_ 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 3 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1 I ration: 7-24.16 SO.BURLINGTON Starts : 06/29/95 at 06:00.0 IN-ces : US 7,BARTLETT BAY AVE(TH 24),& TH 139 Ends : 06/29/95 at 12:00 1I Study ID• ID # 00138 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: BEN GAGE SIN : 28 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re Weather : SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM I-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE T139 FR AUTO DEALERSHIPS TH 24 FROM BRIGHAM RD ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ------------- ----- ---- I Thu 6/29/1995 8:30 Pass Car 0 27 164 5 1 4 208 12 6 3 0 1 4 13 0 O < Md Truck 0 0 15 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.45 Pass Car 0 16 171 17 1 6 227 6 4 1 0 1 4 12 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9:00 Pass Car 0 15 180 22 0 7 180 9 7 4 0 2 2 20 0 2 < Md Truck 0 1 14 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 1 9:15 Pass Car 1 8 179 13 0 6 201 7 4 2 2 7 3 25 4 6 < Md Truck 0 1 12 1 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 2 9:30 Pass Car 4 5 173 16 0 9 168 5 10 1 0 6 1 26 0 4 < Md Truck 0 0 7 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 Pass Car 2 13 203 18 0 10 200 10 3 3 1 6 0 25 0 1 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Hy Truck 1 0 7 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 Pass Car 1 10 191 20 0 10 177 5 5 3 0 5 6 18 2 3 < I Md Truck 0 0 14 0 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10:15 Pass Car 1 10 167 15 0 8 179 6 8 4 1 12 2 21 1 6 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 7 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 Pass Car 2 13 183 19 0 10 175 4 14 7 1 4 8 22 1 3 < I Md Truck 0 1 2 1 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 11 171 21 0 10 205 6 10 4 0 6 6 18 1 5 < 1 Md Truck 0 0 4 2 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 2 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Peds 2 0 0 11:00 Pass Car 2 6 182 29 1 5 185 7 8 3 0 2 12 29 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/19S ration: 7-24.16 SO.BURLINGTON Starts : 06/27/95 at 12:00:C N,,ces : US 7,BARTLETT BAY RD(TH 24),& TH 139 Ends : 06/27/95 at 18:00:C Study ID• ID # 00137 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 / Operator: BEN GAGE SIN • 28 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red ,Weather : SUNNY & HOT Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM I-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE T139 FR AUTO DEALERSHIPS TH 24 FROM BRIGHAM RD ------------------------------------------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------------- Tue 6/27/1995 14:30 Pass Car 3 11 189 17 1 3 221 1 8 5 1 7 5 17 0 3 < I Md Truck 0 1 10 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 1 0 14:45 Pass Car 1 9 202 23 2 7 1B4 8 7 4 1 8 8 19 0 4 < Md Truck 1 0 10 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 6 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 Pass Car 0 10 221 22 1 7 212 5 9 5 0 10 6 14 0 6 < I Md Truck 0 0 13 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Pecs 1 0 0 1 15:15 Pass Car 2 14 235 19 0 7 212 3 6 14 5 5 4 19 3 8 < I Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 2 1 I 15:30 Pass Car 2 11 228 24 1 7 226 4 15 6 2 6 6 28 1 5 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15.45 Pass Car 0 9 219 16 0 10 232 7 8 11 2 16 9 22 1 3 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 Pass Car 2 3 236 23 0 9 191 6 7 13 2 11 5 29 2 5 < Md Truck 0 1 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 Pass Car 1 7 254 1B 1 6 232 6 13 8 0 6 5 28 4 4 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 1 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Peds 0 0 3 0 16:30 Pass Car 0 10 226 21 1 9 213 7 18 19 5 15 8 22 2 3 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Peds 1 0 0 0 16:45 Pass Car 0 6 255 14 0 8 248 2 12 14 2 20 12 25 1 4 < Md Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I17:00 Pass Car 2 6 228 18 2 11 227 6 21 10 2 33 5 35 0 5 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 Date: 10/05/1' Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red I Starts : 06/27/95 at 12:00'.0 :ation: 7-24.16 SO.BURLINGTON : US 7,BARTLETT BAY RD(TH 24),& TH 139 Ends : 06/27/95 at 18:00 ,I Nutes Study ID: ID # 00137 Interval 28 15 min Type: Intervals: 24 C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re operator: BEN GAGE SIN : Correction: 1.00 Weather : SUNNY & HOT US 7 FROM 1-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE T139 FR AUTO DEALERSHIPS TH 24 FROM BRIGHAM RD ----------------------- ----------------- ------ Begins RtRed Left Thru Right ---- ---------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left ------------------------------------- Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right - - I Tue 6/27/1995 17:15 Pass Car 0 11 219 12 1 7 231 4 13 18 1 16 6 21 1 3 < 0 Md Truck 0 1 7 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 17:30 Pass Car 1 4 244 18 1 6 224 5 13 14 0 13 5 19 0 0 < 0 1 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 17:45 Pass Car 4 5 210 17 0 7 207 4 12 11 2 2 0 7 30 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES IDEAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 05 199 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10 / ration: 7-24.143 SO. BURLINGTON Starts : 04/02/97 at 06:00:C Notes US 7 & ALLEN RD Ends : 04/02/97 at 12:00:C Study ID: MERG 00010 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: M. GODIN & A. GAMBLE SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : WINDY,SUNNY,COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM I-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE ALLEN RD FROM SPEAR ST. From West ----------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- ---- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wed 4/02/1997 6:00 Pass Car 0 7 44 0 0 0 67 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 Pass Car 0 7 62 0 0 0 103 11 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 Pass Car 0 5 102 0 0 0 147 17 2 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.45 Pass Car 0 21 103 0 0 0 155 10 9 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 2 0 ':00 Pass Car 0 8 107 0 5 0 209 15 6 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 0 0 7:15 Pass Car 0 15 121 0 8 0 221 21 6 13 0 22 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 1 0 _ 7:30 Pass Car 0 21 131 0 2 0 267 27 5 13 0 22 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 Pass Car 0 11 163 0 8 0 256 31 7 10 0 21 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 3 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 Pass Car 0 12 143- 0 3 0 244 19 11 14 0 26 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 Pass Car 0 20 152 0 8 0 240 24 4 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/2 iation: 7-24.143 SO. BURLINGTON Starts : 04/02/97 at 012:00•( 1. yes : US 7 & ALLEN RD I Study ID• MERG 00010 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: M. GODIN & A. GAMBLE SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re Weather : WINDY,SUNNY,COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 1-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE ALLEN RD FROM SPEAR ST. From West ---------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right — — ------------------ Wed 4/02/1997 8:30 Pass Car 0 12 148 0 4 0 227 18 8 18 D 16 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 8:45 Pass Car 0 15 124 0 4 0 186 20 13 18 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9:00 Pass Car 0 7 146 0 1 0 140 8 12 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 Pass Car 0 15 115 0 3 0 145 12 11 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 4 10 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 Pass Car 0 10 137 0 1 0 177 15 15 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 Pass Car 0 6 130 0 5 0 174 14 7 17 0 7 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 Pass Car 0 12 122 0 2 0 163 10 8 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 Pass Car 0 11 124 0 2 0 166 9 6 18 0 8 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 7 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 Pass Car 0 9 168 0 0 0 175 7 13 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 11 132 0 0 0 151 12 7 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 Peds 0 0 1 11:00 Pass Car 0 11 146 0 3 0 138 6 12 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 ration: 7-24-143 SO. BURLINGTON Starts : 04/01/97 at 12:00: IIN-ces : US 7 & ALLEN RD Ends : 04/01/97 at 18:00:C Study ID: MERG 00009 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: M. GODIN & A. GAMBLE SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red Weather : WINDY,SUNNY,COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 1-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE ALLEN RD FROM SPEAR ST. ----------------------- From West ----------------------- Begins RtRed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Tue 4/01/1997 14:30 Pass Car 0 14 188 0 6 0 170 15 9 20 0 4 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 6 5 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 Pass Car 0 13 172 0 2 0 159 12 13 25 0 6 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 5 4 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15:00 Pass Car 0 17 147 0 3 0 182 16 9 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 3 0 0 0 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 Pass Car 0 19 195 0 3 0 177 12 13 32 0 7 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 15:30 Pass Car 0 15 191 0 0 0 192 10 11 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 Pass Car 0 15 193 0 6 0 190 19 11 23 0 16 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck I 0 2 5 0 0 0 8 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16:00 Pass Car 0 20 206 0 1 0 182 17 12 17 0 11 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 1 0 0 0 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 2 0 I 16:15 Pass Car 0 13 223 0 1 0 193 19 10 25 0 6 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 3 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 16:30 Pass Car I 0 17 208 0 3 0 167 13 11 33 0 12 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.45 Pass Car 0 18 217 0 2 0 177 16 8 41 0 6 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 3 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I17:00 Pass Car 0 28 230 0 9 0 205 17 16 42 0 11 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1`' I -ation: 7-24-143 SO. BURLINGTON Starts : 04/01/97 at 12:00.0( : 04/01/97 at 18:00.^� 1—ces : US 7 & ALLEN RD Interval Ends 15 min Intervals: 24 Study ID: MERG 00009 Operator: M. GODIN & A. GAMBLE SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re� Weather : WINDY,SUNNY,COOL Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM I-189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE ALLEN RD FROM SPEAR ST. From West - ----------------------- ---------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left --------------- Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Tue 4/01/1997 0 23 274 0 6 0 152 18 17 43 0 7 0 0 0 0 < 17:15 Pass Car 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 17:30 Pass Car 0 17 249 0 4 0 186 16 8 42 0 5 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 17:45 Pass Car 0 18 240 0 1 0 140 18 13 34 0 2 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 SETCON TECHNOLOGIES REPORT TITLE (IDEAS VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/199 7-22.8 SHELBURNE Starts : 06/29/95 at 06:00:0 (Location: Notes : US 7,BAY RD(TH 1),& EXECUTIVE DR(TH 82) Ends : 06/29/95 at 12:00:0 Study ID• ID # 00147 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: AIMEE NEVEAU SIN : 125 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red : SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 (Weather US 7 FROM SO.BURLINGTON US 7 FROM CHARLOTTE TH 82 FROM BUSINESS PARK TH 1 FROM TH 7 ------------------ - ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right ------------------------------------------------------9------------------------ ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Thu 6/29/1995 6:00 Pass Car 0 0 42 5 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 0 3 6:15 Pass Car 0 0 58 6 0 3 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 1 0 6.30 Pass Car 2 0 59 9 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 6:45 Pass Car 5 1 105 16 0 0 128 2 0 1 0 0 1 11 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I00 Pass Car 2 2 77 14 1 2 164 2 2 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 1 0 0 I 7:15 Pass Car 1 5 100 14 0 3 180 1 0 0 0 2 2 18 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 0 0 7:30 Pass Car 0 6 142 20 0 3 189 0 3 1 0 1 2 22 0 2 < Md Truck 1 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 7:45 Pass Car 1 8 131 11 0 2 166 0 2 0 0 1 0 25 0 5 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds I 0 - 0 0-, 1 8:00 Pass Car 2 4 118 7 0 1 131 4 1 1 0 0 1 26 0 2 < Md Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IHy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 Pass Car 1 5 118 12 0 0 157 3 0 1 0 1 2 19 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 10 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 IHy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/11 �ation: 7-22.8 SHELBURNE Starts : 06/29/95 at 06:00.J( IN„ces : US 7,BAY RD(TH 1),& EXECUTIVE DR(TH 82) Ends : 06/29/95 at 12:0071 Study ID: ID # 00147 Interval 15 min Type: Intervals: 24 C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/re Operator: AIMEE NEVEAU SIN . 125 Weather : SUNNY & WARM Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM SO.BURLINGTON US 7 FROM CHARLOTTE TH 82 FROM BUSINESS PARK TH 1 FROM TH 7 ----------------------- I ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left --------- Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right --------------------' I Thu 6/29/1995 3 3 117 16 0 5 155 2 2 1 0 0 3 28 0 2 < 8:30 Pass Car 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 I 8:45 Pass Car 3 1 146 19 0 6 146 1 0 2 0 1 1 25 1 2 < 1 0 0 Md Truck 1 0 5 3 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 Pass Car 3 4 131 14 0 3 151 2 0 1 0 0 4 16 1 1 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 9:15 Pass Car 3 8 136 10 0 2 128 1 2 3 0 3 2 21 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 14 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 9:30 Pass Car 3 5 145 13 0 2 144 0 0 1 0 5 1 15 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 9:45 Pass Car 0 5 121 17 0 3 161 0 1 0 2 1 2 8 0 1 < 1 Z 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 10:00 Pass Car 2 4 142 15 0 4 138 0 2 0 0 2 1 16 0 3 < I 1 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 7 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 10:15 Pass Car 3 2 137 24 0 4 131 1 5 1 0 2 2 13 0 3 < 0 0 0 0 I Md Truck 0 0 7 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 10:30 Pass Car 1 5 138 15 0 6 155 0 0 1 0 1 1 25 0 2 < 0 0 0 1 Md Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 6 134 30 0 5 147 0 3 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 < 2 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 II 11:00 Pass Car 3 1 134 11 0 3 146 1 1 0 2 1 0 10 0 2 < t 0 1 0 Z 11 Md Truck 0 0 9 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 I VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/19S ation: 7-22.8 SHELBURNE Starts : 06/27/95 at 12:00:C I�_.:es : US 7,BAY RD(TH 1),& EXECUTIVE DR(TH 82) Ends : 06/27/95 at 18:00:C (Study ID• ID # 00145 Interval 15 min Type: Intervals: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red 24 Operator: AIMEE NEVEAU SIN : 125 Weather : SUNNY & HOT Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM SO.BURLINGTON US 7 FROM CHARLOTTE TH 82 FROM BUSINESS PARK TH 1 FROM TH 7 ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------------------- ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ---------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------------- Tue 6/27/1995 14:30 Pass Car 2 4 146 25 0 2 151 1 0 1 0 0 0 22 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 7 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 Pass Car 2 1 156 20 0 5 140 0 0 1 1 5 1 26 1 1 0 3 < 0 Md Truck 1 0 9 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Hy Truck I 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 Pass Car 3 1 157 14 0 6 153 1 0 1 0 1 1 25 0 0 0 0 6 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 9 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 Pass car 0 3 195 15 0 7 157 1 2 0 0 1 1 30 0 0 0 2 < 1 I Md Truck 0 0 3 1 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 D Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 Pass Car 2 2 180 36 0 6 192 0 3 1 0 2 0 38 0 1 0 7 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds I 15:45 Pass Car 5 0 4 181 20 0 4 154 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 2 28 0 5 < Md Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I{ Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 Pass Car 3 6 181 19 0 2 192 1 2 1 0 3 2 26 0 0 6 < 0 I Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti i. 16:15 Pass Car 2 b 179 27 1 3 153 1 1 1 0 3 0 29 0 1 0 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 Pass Car 0 4 200 24 0 7 189 1 6 2 0 5 3 25 0 1 0 3 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 Peds 16:45 Pass Car 7 0 9 203 29 1 3 179 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 38 0 6 < Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 17:00 Pass Car 4 1 206 23 0 0 180 0 3 2 0 4 2 25 0 0 0 2 < 0 Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Peds 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1S ration: 7-22.8 SHELBURNE DR(TH 82) Starts Ends : 27/95 at 12:00`,I 06 / : 06/27/95 at 18:00;n( 1,.-ces : US 7,BAY RD(TH 1),& EXECUTIVE Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Study ID• ID # 00145 Operator: AIMEE NEVEAU SIN : 125. Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/rec I Weather : SUNNY & HOT Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM SO.BURLINGTON US 7 FROM CHARLOTTE TH 82 FROM BUSINESS PARK TH1 FROM TH 7 I - ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right ---------------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right .. Tue 6/27/1995 17:15 Pass Car 1 1 171 25 0 4 156 0 2 1 0 3 2 22 2 3 Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 17:30 Pass Car 11 2 200 23 1 0 3 151 1 0 3 0 0 5 2 26 0 3 < 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 17:45 Pass Car 2 3 172 30 0 3 163 0 4 0 0 1 3 27 0 1 < 0 0 0 0 Md Truck 0 0 3 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1998 ration: 7-24.24 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 02/17/98 at 12:00:00 14 : US 7 & IMPERIAL DRIVE Ends : 02/17/98 at 18:00:00 S les dy ID: MERG 00006 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: C.PHILBROOK & A.PORTER SIN : 113• Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red W-ther : PARTLY SUNNY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 1 89 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE IMPERIAL FR GRN DOLPHIN DRIVE FROM AUDI/VW SALES ----------------------- ----------------------- E ns — — RtRed Left Thru Right — ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Tuc 2/17/1998 14:30 Pass Car 0 6 234 0 0 0 251 2 0 3 0 9 0 0 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 14 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 Pass Car 0 6 253 2 0 0 247 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ':00 Pass Car 0 3 227 0 0 0 254 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 < iMd Truck 0 1 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 1 1 0 j:15 Pass Car 0 6 232 1 0 0 229 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 < ! Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass Car 0 6 257 0 0 1 252 4 0 3 0 6 0 1 0 0 < I30 Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 45 Pass Car 0 9 229 2 0 2 294 2 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �:00 Pass Car 0 11 293 2 0 2 290 2 0 1 0 9 0 2 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 1 0 6:15 Pass Car 0 9 254 0 0 0 311 7 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 Pass Car 0 7 249 2 0 0 306 3 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 2 < Md Truck 0 1 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b:45 Pass Car 0 14 295 0 0 0 325 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 100 0 0 1 0 Pass Car 0 17 289 1 0 0 438 3 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 2 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 3 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1998 ration: 7-24.24 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 02/17/98 at 12:00:00 tti.�ces : US 7 & IMPERIAL DRIVE Ends : 02/17/98 at 18:00:00 Study ID: MERG 00006 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 aperator: C.PHILBROOK & A.PORTER SIN : 113• Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red :feather : PARTLY SUNNY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 1 89 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE IMPERIAL FR GRN DOLPHIN DRIVE FROM AUDI/VW SALES ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Begins RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Tue 2/17/1998 17:15 Pass Car 0 15 265 0 0 0 359 7 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 17:30 Pass Car 0 12 263 0 0 0 306 2 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 Pass Car 0 13 251 1 0 0 255 4 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 1 < Md Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 0 1 0 I SETCON TECHNOLOGIES InFAS REPORT TITLE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 1 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1998 L ation: 7-24.24 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 02/20/98 at 06:00:00 N es : US 7 & IMPERIAL DRIVE Ends : 02/20/98 at 12:00:00 S�. dy ID: MERG 00009 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 Operator: C. PHILBROOK & A. PORTER SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red W : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 [ther US 7 FROM 189 US 7 FROM SHELBURNE IMPERIAL FR GRN DOLPHIN DRIVE FROM AUDI/VW ----------------------- SALES 6 — ----------------------- �ns— — — — — — — RtRed Left ----------------------------------------------------------------- Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Fri 2/20/1998 `} 00 Pass Car 0 0 52 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Pass Car 0 1 80 2 0 0 114 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass Car 0 1 146 0 0 0 141 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 < I30 Md Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i'tlJJ l.dl ^ V 1 L 171 1.0 0 i 85 1 0 2 n 6 n n n n < '4J Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Pass Car 0 2 158 2 0 0 180 1 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I:15 Pass Car 0 5 249 1 0 0 222 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 1 0 �:30 Pass Car 0 2 259 4 0 0 281 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I':45 Pass Car 0 3 335 3 0 0 261 0 0 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1:00 0 0 1 0 Pass Car 0 5 316 1 0 2 256 2 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 0 0 1 0 :15 Pass Car 0 2 268 2 0 0 252 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Page: 2 Three Vehicle Analysis with Right on Red Date: 10/05/1998 I ration: 7-24.24 SOUTH BURLINGTON Starts : 02/20/98 at 06:00:00 ,.motes : US 7 & IMPERIAL DRIVE Ends : 02/20/98 at 12:00:00 .Study ID: MERG 00009 Interval 15 min Intervals: 24 I Operator: C. PHILBROOK & A. PORTER SIN : 0 Type: C,MdT,HyT,P-rt/red 'Reather : CLOUDY Correction: 1.00 US 7 FROM 189 Us 7 FROM SHELBURNE IMPERIAL FR GRN DOLPHIN DRIVE FROM AUDI/VW SALES ----------------------- ----------------------- Begins RtRed Left ---------------------------------------------------------------- Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right ----------------------- RtRed Left Thru Right RtRed Left Thru Right Fri 2/20/1998 8:30 Pass Car 0 4 240 1 0 0 278 2 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 8:45 Pass Car 0 1 217 0 0 0 210 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Pecs 1 0 0 0 9:00 Pass Car 0 5 165 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 9:15 Pass Car 0 3 171 6 0 0 213 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 Pass Car 0 3 130 0 0 1 225 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 0 13 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 Pass Car 0 1 205 1 0 0 205 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 < Md Truck 0 1 14 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 11 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 Pass Car 0 4 149 3 0 0 185 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 < Md Truck 0 1 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Hy Truck 0 0 9 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 Pass Car 0 3 177 1 0 0 220 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 1 11 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 1 0 0 0 10:30 Pass Car 0 2 219 6 0 0 207 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 8 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 7 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 Pass Car 0 3 212 2 0 0 207 2 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pecs 1 0 0 0 11:00 Pass Car 0 3 201 0 0 0 230 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 < I Md Truck 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Hy Truck 0 0 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Wed, January 20, 1999 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM EB-Fayette Drive It t th t rt t WB-Macintosh It t th t rt t NB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t SB- Shelburne Road it t th t rt t 18 0 1 0 19 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 243 18 0 0 2 0 251 19 19 0 26 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 0 258 25 0 0 1 1 220 15 20 0 20 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 14 0 265 16 2 0 1 0 254 19 15 0 16 0 0 0 20 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 319 20 1 0 1 0 276 12 13 0 11 0 1 0 15 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 13 0 315 13 2 0 2 0 278 19 19 1 22 0 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 236 14 2 0 4 0 254 11 13 0 18 0 T 0 11 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 9 0 321 12 1 0 0 0 269 11 13 0 29 0 5 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 13 0 327 8 2 0 1 0 271 9 21 0 23 0 2 0 19 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 21 0 381 1 1 0 2 0 304 0 19 0 16 0 0 0 12 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 28 0 370 10 2 0 1 0 325 4 16 0 19 0 2 0 14 0 4 0 0 0 6 0 11 0 317 7 4 0 5 0 289 5 16 0 28 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 28 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 j 5 1 0 11 0 295 8 1 0 1 3 0 227 8 25 0 15 min hour total total 602 603 623 692 2520 695 2613 578 2588 672 2637 702 2647 781 2733 792 2947 699 2974 640 2912 4:45 -5:45 peak 87 0 9 0 57 0 12 0 4 0 14 0 73 0 1395 26 9 0 9 0 1189 18 72 0 2974 2974 87 9 T 57 12 4 14 73 1421 9 9 1207 72 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB total Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB ialysis Hour % Truck:sl 0.0% 10.0% 1 1.7% 1 1.4% 1 1.590 Volumes LT 87 12 73 9 Analysis Hour PHFj 0.94 1 TH 9 4 1421 1207 RT 57 14 9 72 2974 Enter 153 30 1503 1288 2974 Exit 22 154 1276 1490 2942 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Wed, January 20, 1999 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 15 min hour total total 460 524 587 636 2207 655 2402 635 2513 539 2465 522 2351 478 2174 486 2025 442 1928 511 1917 7:30 -8:30 peak 60 1 2 1 57 2 10 0 2 0 4 0 35 0 1009 50 2 0 6 0 1163 62 45 2 2513 2513 61 3 59 10 2 4 35 1059 2 6 1225 47 Analysis Hour EB-Fayette Drive It t th t rt t WB-Macintosh It t th t rt t NB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t SB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t 12 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 202 10 0 1 2 0 194 12 8 0 6 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 243 11 2 0 1 0 232 9 3 1 17 0 1 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 268 10 0 0 2 0 243 13 12 1 15 1 1 0 14 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 243 9 2 0 1 0 310 15 8 0 16 0 0 1 18 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 6 0 241 16 0 0 1 0 316 18 13 1 12 0 0 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 257 15 0 0 2 0 294 16 12 0 19 1 1 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 8 1 227 17 1 0 0 0 234 10 7 2 6 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 10 0 234 27 0 0 1 0 200 18 10 0 9 0 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 224 21 0 0 0 0 170 20 10 1 24 0 1 0 17 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 212 30 1 0 0 0 156 24 10 1 16 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 2 205 27 0 0 2 0 140 22 5 0 14 0 1 0 1 6 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 7 0 8 0 204 25 0 0 4 0 200 22 16 2 EB WB NB SB total Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB -ialysis Hour %Trucks 3.3% 0.0% 4.6% 5.0% 4.7% Volumes LT 61 10 35 6 Analysis Hour PHF 0.96 TH 3 2 1059 1225 RT 59 4 2 47 2513 Enter 123 16 1096 1278 2513 Exit 10 85 1294 1128 2517 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Wed, January 20, 1999 3:00 PM 3:15 PM 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 15 min hour total total 408 469 384 456 1717 424 1733 401 1665 426 1707 469 1720 454 1750 486 1835 465 1874 470 1875 5:00 -6:00 peak 18 0 1 0 15 0 54 0 1 0 24 0 2 0 717 29 18 0 20 0 935 26 14 1 1875 1875 18 1. 1 1 15 54 1 1 24 2 1 746 18 20 1 961 15 EB- Pine Haven Shore It t th t rf t WB-Locust Hill Dr It t th t rf t NB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t SB- Shelburne Road It t to t rt t 1 0 0 0 1 0 12 1 1 0 5 1 4 0 160 14 0 0 2 0 189 10 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 4 3 0 1 226 8 1 0 0 1 191 17 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 171 7 0 0 2 0 176 5 3 0 3 1 1 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 217 10 0 0 2 0 189 8 10 0 5 0 0 0 2 1 10 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 178 7 0 0 1 1 193 13 7 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 161 7 0 0 1 0 203 13 2 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 8 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 157 12 0 0 2 0 220 7 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 205 9 0 0 1 0 223 12 5 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 190 6 4 0 3 0 216 8 5 1 6 0 0 0 3 0 15 0 1 0 12 0 1 0 200 5 5 0 7 0 219 8 4 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 173 9 5 0 6 0 255 4 3 0 6 0 1 0 9 0 25 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 154 9 1 4 0 4 0 245 6 2 0 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB total -)alysis Hour % Trucksl 0.0% 10.0% 13.8% 12.7% 1 _3.0% Analysis Hour PHF 0.96 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB Volumes LT 18 54 2 20 TH 1 1 746 961 RT 15 24 18 15 1875 Enter 34 79 766 996 1875 Exit 39 18 1030 815 1502 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vi Wed, January 20, 1999 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 15 min hour total total 349 405 403 394 1551 388 1590 424 1609 386 1592 388 1586 367 1565 367 1508 339 1461 330 1403 7:30 -8:30 peak 20 2 0 0 1 1 11 1 1 0 23 0 1 0 521 47 31 1 10 1 872 49 15 1 1609 1609 22 0 2 12 1 1 23 1 1 568 1 32 11 1 921 1 16 EB- Pine Haven Shore it t th t rt t WB-Locust Hill Dr it t th t rt r NB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t SB- Shelburne Road It t th t rt t 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 125 12 6 0 1 0 179 11 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 144 12 2 0 1 0 224 12 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 127 12 6 0 2 0 233 10 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 127 7 8 0 2 0 225 10 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 123 18 11 0 4 0 197 17 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 144 10 6 1 2 1 217 12 15 1 7 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 114 17 8 3 1 1 202 19 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 119 9 6 0 1 0 213 22 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 113 20 7 0 3 0 196 17 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 124 20 8 1 3 0 179 18 0 0 10 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 113 8 7 1 3 1 167 21 0 0 8 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 b 0 3 0 112 17 2 0 2 0 160 16 0 0 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB total -ialysls Hour % Trucksl 12.5% 2.8% 18.0% 15.4% 1 6.4% Analysis Hour PHFj 0.95 Analysis Hour EB WB NB SB Volumes LT 22 12 1 11 TH 0 1 568 921 RT 2 23 32 16 1609 Enter 24 36 601 948 1609 Exit 44 17 935 582 1578 APPENDIX B IDX DRIVEWAY ATR COUNTS TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION ATR Monitoring IDX Parking Count South Burlington, Vermont Entering Traffic Front Parking Lot, off IDX Drive Hourly Average Average Overall Summaries 10/2/98 10/3/98 10/4/98 10/5/98 10/6/98 10/7/98 10/8/98 10/9/98 Weekday Weekend Average MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON 12:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 5:00 AM 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 6:00 AM 3 3 6 2 2 1 6 4 2 3 7:00 AM 35 30 38 43 0 3 40 37 2 27 8:00 AM 90 90 87 92 1 0 102 92 1 66 9:00 AA4 15 14 19 31 1 1 20 1 14 10:00 AM 10 12 10 10. 2 1 11 2 8 11:00 AM 11 8 9 13 5 5 10 5 9 12:00 PM 29 32 29 32 4 6 31 5 22 1:00 PM 40 41 39 42 2 6 41 4 28 2:00 PM 16 11 17 13 13 2 2 14 2 11 3:00 PM 8 9 8 11 9 3 4 9 4 7 4:00 PM 5 4 3 10 5 6 8 5 7 6 5:00 PM 6 11 5 3 9 5 4 7 5 6 6:00 PM 6 6 6 9 5 4 2 6 3 5 7:00 PM 5 7 1 3 3 1 1 4 1 3 8:00 PM 1 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9:00 PM 3 0 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 10:00 PM 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 11:00 PM 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 TOTALS 291 276 293 318 44 47 298 50 221 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River junction, N'T ATR Monitoring IDX Parking Count South Burlington, Vermont Exiting Traffic Front Parking Lot, off IDX Drive Hourly Average Average Overall Summaries 10/2/98 10/3/98 10/4/98 10/5/98 10/6/98 10/7/98 10/8/98 10/9/98 Weekday Weekend Average MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON 12:00 AM 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 3 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 7:00 AM 6 8 8 3 0 0 9 7 0 5 8:00 AM 13 10 13 20 2 12 14 1 10 9:00 AM 13 12 11 17 2 _0 2 _ 13 2 10 10:00 AM 18 10 20 31 5 0 20 3 14 11:00 AM 34 34 33 44 9 3 36 6 26 12:00 PM 73 90 78 93 9 6 84 8 58 1:00 P1bi 30 25 24 29 3 5 27 4 19 2:00 PM 16 17 16 33 20 3 3 20 3 15 3:00 PM 21 25 20 23 28 1 9 23 5 18 4:00 PM 47 56 61 57 61 7 6 56 7 42 5:00 PM 129 121 121 128 122 3 9 124 6 90 6:00 PM 23 29 45 35 25 6 1 31 4 23 7:00 PM 9 7 8 13 10 3 2 9 3 7 8:00 PM 4 7 6 6 5 2 2 6 2 5 9:00 PM 2 1 2 3 1 0 3 2 2 2 10:00 PM 1 2 4 1 2 1 0 2 1 2 11:00PM 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 TOTALS 458 475 493 518 60 53 479 62 350 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River Junction, NIT ATR Monitoring IDX Parking Count South Burlington, Vermont Entering Traffic Tubes placed along IDX Drive, toward the back parking lot. Hourly Average Average Overall Summaries 10/2/98 10/3/98 10/4/98 10/5/98 10/6/98 10/7/98 10/8/98 10/9/98 Weekday Weekend Average MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 AM 9 10 10 14 1 1 15 12 1 9 7:00 AM 55 56 51 56 1 2 48 53 2 38 8:00 AM 116 120 138 118 3 2 130 124 3 90 9:00 AM 25 21 21 24 1 4 23 3 16 10:00 AM 6 11 4 5 9 4 1 7 3 6 11:00 AM 12 15 10 9 11 4 7 11 6 10 12:00 PM 48 36 39 38 61 6 4 44 5 33 1:00 PM 50 41 39 44 49 2 1 45 2 32 2:00 PM 13 13 17 15 10 0 2 14 1 10 3:00 PM 6 3 3 5 7 4 2 5 3 4 4:00 PM 4 4 2 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 5:00 PM 1 6 3 2 5 1 0 3 1 3 6:00 PM 4 8 8 6 4 0 0 6 0 4 7:00 PM 4 3 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 8:00 PM 5 1 4 4 4 0 2 4 1 3 9:00 RNI 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10:00 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 155 347 339 358 375 31 33 193 358 36 263 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River junction, VT ATR Monitoring IDX Parking Count South Burlington, Vermont Exiting Traffic Tubes placed along IDX Drive, toward the back parking lot. Hourly Average Average Overall Summaries 11/2/98 11/3/98 11/4/98 11/5/98 11/6/98 11/7/98 11/8/98 11/9/98 Weekday Weekend 1lverage MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON 12:00 AM 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 1:00 AM 1 2 1 1 1 0 3 2 1 1 2:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 6:00 AM 1 5 4 5 1 1 6 4 1 3 7:00 AM 3 1 7 3 1 0 2 3 1 2 8:00 AM 11 7 7 8 0 2 10 9 1 6 9:00 AM 12 17 11 13 1 3 13 2 10 10:00 AM 13 12 12 15 11 4 3 13 4 10 11:00 AM 42 29 30 30 30 7 6 32 7 25 12:00 PM 67 64 54 55 37 2 6 55 4 41 1:00 PM 14 18 20 19 16 1 5 17 3 13 2:00 PM 12 12 11 12 13 2 3 12 3 9 3:00 PM 13 12 11 18 28 4 5 16 5 13 4:00 Phi 53 65 58 60 52 4 7 58 6 43 5:00 PM 113 110 98 108 100 1 0 106 1 76 6:00 PM 27 27 32 26 25 0 2 27 1 20 7:00 PM 9 10 5 8 6 1 1 8 1 6 8:00 Phi 4 15 6 5 6 0 2 7 1 5 9:00 PM 4 2 5 3 1 1 0 3 1 2 10:00 PM 2 3 5 2 0 0 2 2 1 2 11:00 PM 0 1 2 1 4 1 0 2 1 1 TOTALS 373 413 381 395 363 32 50 21 391 46 289 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River Junction, NIT ATR Monitoring IDX Parking Count South Burlington, Vermont Entering IDX Entrance Hourly Average Average Overall Summaries 10/2/98 10/3/98 10/4/98 10/5/98 10/6/98 10/7/98 10/8/98 10/9/98 Weekday Weekend Average MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN MON 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 5 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 6:00 AM 7 10 3 3 .0 0 2 5 0 4 7:00 AM 25 31 27 29 1 0 28 28 1 20 8:00 AM 65 60 63 51 3 0 53 58 ) 2 42 9:00 AM 0 4 8 16 1 1 7 1 5 10:00 AM 9 9 4 7 1 0 7 1 5 11:00 AM 4 5 6 4 15 7 1 7 4 6 12:00 PM 20 26 10 10 21 4 5 17 5 14 1:00 PM 19 10 18 26 15 2 6 18 4 14 2:00 PM 3 6 6 13 4 3 2 3 5 3:00 PM 4 7 4 5 3 0 4 _6 5 2 4 4:00 PM 6 6 5 7 5 0 3 6 2 5 5:00 PM 1 1 1 4 3 0 2 2 1 2 6:00 PM 5 2 5 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 7:00 PM 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 8:00 PM 2 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 9:00 Phi 2 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 10:00 Phi 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 180 173 183 177 26 29 175 31 133 Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River Junction, VI' Trip Generation Table Trip Gen Rates based on: Assumptions about current conditions: Present Employment: Employee Increase: 1202 2005 Trio Gen Calculations TRIP GENERATION PERCENT OF PERCENT OF SCENARIO RATE (per employee) TRIPS IN TRIPS OUT AM Peak Hour 0.52 93% 7% PM Peak Hour 0.42 5% 95% 2000 New Time of Day Employees OUT AM Peak 136 5 PM Peak 136 54 2005 New Time of Day Employees OUT AM Peak 1202 46 PM Peak 1202 483 EMPLOYEE RATE NEW MOVED TOTAL TO DATE 1999 86 86 2000 2001 213 435 2002 263 698 2003 327 1025 20041 1151 1140 PERCENT PERCENT TRIP GENERATION NEW TRIPS BY NEW TRIPS BY OF TRIPS OF TRIPS RATE (per employee) 2000 2005 IN OUT SCENARIO AM Peak Hour 0.52 70 623 93% 7% PM Peak Hour 0.42 57 508 5% 95% PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2000 AM PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2000 PM 0 L0% 0% 1 % 0% 0% j � 000 o v o US 7/13aldwin Ave. 0 o 0 � 0 � o 0% -s 0% 0% -► 4% —� t r I 0 o 0 0 c o US 7/Fayette Dr. 0 0 0 0 o m L 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% —i j o o v I US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension r 0 O 0 0 O L0% T� 0% 1 % 0% 0% 7 0 O 0 0 O �� US 7/13artlett Bay Rd. 0 O 0 0 O L 0% 0% 0% 0% � 000� US 7/Allen Rd. 0 O _0 0 O L 0/ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 O 0 Q) O0F US 7/Pine Haven 0 O 0 0 O L 0% 1% 0% 0% —� 0% —i t r 0 O 0 0 � O US 7/Bay Road 0 o -1 0 °v o �- 0% .— 0% 0% 0% �` - 0% 0% � 000 0 t r r' US 7/13aldwin Ave. 0 o I 0 0 v o I 0% 0% -1 0% 0% 0% 0 v 0 0 o 0 US 7/Fayette Dr. 0 J 0 0 L % . 0% 0 0% �4 7% 0% 0% -i j OOo C. o 0 US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension o N ° C°A o O L 0% _ 0% 0% —� 12% 0% _� I o O t I 0 0 N O F US 7/13artlett Bay Rd. o O c0 0 N L �_F 0% .4 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -i 000 CD0 0 US 7/Allen Rd. ° o O 0 v o N 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% o O � o O O US 7/Pine Haven 0 N I v 0 O IT L 0 %% 0% 0% 0% 0% I o O 0 0 O o f US 7/Bay Road PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2000 AM PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2000 PM o �r 0 ^ o 0% 0% 0% 4°/ _i 0% 0 o 0 0 OF US 7/Home Avenue O 0 ° N O L °% 1 0% 1% 0% 1% —� o O 0 0 O US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) O 0 o N O L 0% 0% 29% 0% 0% —� -�tr o O 0 0 Cl US 7/1-189 Ramp C o 0 M 0 L 4 `-- o% 0% 7% 0% —� —1 000 O co O US 7/Swift Street 0 O ° o 0 co O 0 .�1L 0% -1 0% 0% 6 °�� —� 000 C)v t r OF US 7/Queen City Park Rd. 0 o 0 0 0 CD o 0% 0% � 0% 6% -i o O 0 0 7 O US 7/Brewer Parkway 08-1 o 0 n o I (,ice t—0 °% 0% ,% 1% � 000 o�o US 7/Laurel Hill Dr. 0 oI 0 0 N o L ' 0% 0% 0% i_ 0% 0% j v cn o� US 7/Home Avenue 70 O 0 0 N O L 0% . 0% 0% -� 0% 0% 0% I r I O W N US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) 0 O 0 0 N O L 0% 0% 0% —• 0% o% O t r O N US 7/1-189 Ramp C 0 O 0 0 N O 0% 0% —� f— 0% 0% 0% ( t r —� I 00 o c L0 US 7/Swift Street 0 O J 0 0 N O I I 0% 0% -� 0% 0% 0% t r I 0 o co Lo US 7/Queen City Park Rd. 0 o J 0 0 v o 1 L � — 0% � 0% 0% -� 0% 0% °% 0 r 0 0 w o F l) US 7/Brewer Parkway 0 o J 0 0 v O 1 L 0% 0% 0% :4 0% 0% °% j 0Lo coLo F US 7/1-aurel Hill Dr. TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2000 AM TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2000 PM oI t-n o l 0 —} 1 U — 0 0 � (- t 1 o I co o US 7/Baldwin Ave. a O tS7 O L ° .�1 0 —! ° .— 0 ° US 7/Fayette Dr. 3 0 0 0 I O j— t I O Cl) US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension —] . �T jv L T: 0 • ° , o US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd. - lL L 0 0 ° C) F US 7/Alien Rd. 0 0 1 o 0 �o ° —` 0� o t co o US 7/Pine Haven 1L 0 0 o in o F US 7/Bay Road O N JL O ° 0 _:A 0 ° ° � o 0 0 F US 7/Baldwin Ave. O N O L ° .�1 0 —} o 0 ° —' ° t US 7/Fayette Dr, O O I J N L L 0 4 ° �j t I I US 7/Holmes Rd, Extension I 0 O 0 0 7 0 US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd. C) 0) (� L �— 0 0 o ° —0F f US 7/Allen Rd. C, co �1 L L �00 ° o ° t ° 1 US 7/Pine Haven m o �lL ° 0 0 ° t r °i �r O O OF US 7/Bay Road TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2000 AM TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2000 PM p N J O L �0 0 j� 0 3 US 7/Home Avenue o fO o L 0 0 1 US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) m 0 0 0 0 o 20 0 U5 7lI-189 Ramp C o co �lL o - 0 --� 0 0 j� 5 D � O N T US 7/Swift Street N O � O L 0 0 0 —' ter--- D 0 t F US 7/Queen City Park Rd. o o .�1L 0 0 0 0 o t I co C:,US 7/Brewer Parkway o o L 0 0 O US 7/Laurel Hill Dr. 0 �l� 0 �D 0 0 —• �j 0 (� 0 0 1 N t I 0) O F US 7/Home Avenue L 4 0 o� -�tr 0 0 T F US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) 0 0 -�1L 0 0 0 0 —' �� I O t r T O US 7/1-189 Ramp C 0 J 0 L 0 0 —! 0 .0 0 0F US 7/Swift Street J L a0 0 0 0 —i o m o� US 7/Queen City Park Rd. O JL N O 0 0I .- 0 0 m O� US 7/Brewer Parkway O N O D .�1L 0 �• �0 O � I N t I co O US 7/1-aurel Hill Dr. PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2005 AM PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2005 PM 0 o 0 � 0 n o 04'0% 0% 1% 0% 0% •� t �• o O 0 0 LO O US 7/BaldWn Ave. 0 o ° � 0 n o l L _ o% 0% 1 % 0°% 4% 000 US 7/1'ayette Dr, 0 0 0 ° o co �— 5% �J 1 % 0% --�l 1% 0°% 0°�� o 0 F US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0% f— D% 0% 1% 0% 0% 000 o n US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd. 0 0 JL 0 0 0 0% 0% :-# 0% 0% 0% -i O W O US 7/Allen Rd. 0 Cl 0 0 0 L 0% D% 0% 0% 0% —b 0% t r 0 o0)0 0 0 US 7/Pine Haven 0 O JlL 0 0 O .-0% 1 % 0% 0% 0% —� t r 0 O 0 0 °G O US 7/1 1 0 J 0 0 1 L 0% � 0% 0°% 0°% 0% � O O ° n US 7/BaldWn Ave. 0 J 0 0c- L L boo 0% —� 0% 0% 0% 000 v ^ o US 7/Fayette Dr. 0 0 J1�. 0 0 o v 1% 0°% 0% —• 8% 0% —� I 0 0 t r 0 a 0 0 F US 7/Holmes Rd, Extension 0 m 0 IT L + 0% 0% 0% 12% 0% I 0 O t r , , r ° F US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd. 0 0 0 0 0 Lr 0% 1 4 0°% 0% 0% —• 0% 0% I 0 O t r 0 0 � O US 7/Allen Rd. o 0 J 0 ° � o L 0% -4 0% -� 0%-► 0% 0% �tr 000 oToF US 7/Pine Haven o J1L 0 c7 0 O 0% 0% -:4 0% - IN 0% 0°' o t r 0 0 US 7/Bay Road PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2005 AM PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION, 2005 PM 0 o ° co 0 O � 0% 0% 0% --♦ 4% (� 1% t o O I 0 0 O US 7/Home Avenue O 0 N O 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% —� o O 0 0 O US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) 0 o O 0 0 � o N O L gs - 0% 0% 28% 0% s, 0 O r�► 0 0 O US --189 Ramp C 0 O J1L 0 co 0 U) O _0% 0% 7% 0% o°,° —� —� 0 O 0 0 -'T O F US 71Switt Street 0 O --------------- 0 0 0 tD O • 0% 0% 0% 5% o 0 0 US 7/Queen City Park Rd. o �J Ln `n CD o 0% s-- 0% 0% 0% 0% —� --�6% 0 o t 0 0° 'ITof US 7/Brewer Parkway ° 0 Ld 0% 0% i— 2% 0% —� 2% -� t 0 F US 71Laurel Hill Dr. 0 0 0 0 0 *--0% 0% 0% —i 0% 0% o t 0 0 F US 7/Home Avenue 0 0 0 O O 0% 0% 0% 0% —► 0% —i 1 0 O 0 0 N US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) 0 0 0 O O 0% 0% 1% 0% —� 0% t 7 000 o N o US 7/1-189 Ramp C 0 O 0 0 N O L 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% r�► 000 o co cD Lo US 7/Swift Street 0 O 0 0 N O L � 0% �J D 0% 0% 0% —► 0% I t I O � O US 7/Queen City Park Rd. 0 o 0 0 co 0 �. 0% 0% 0% 0% —� 0% -i 0 t Lo US 7/Brewer Parkway 0 o 0 co o 1 L 0% o-- 0% 0% 0% 0% —� 0% t o 0 0 F US 7Aaurel Hill Dr. TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2005 AM TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2005 PM o n 0 v o ° .�1L 0 ° 7 t I N r US 7/Baldwin Ave. o 0 v o ° -�1L 0 -� 4 ° t I 0 0� US 7/Fayette Dr. 0 0 m L L 0 f— 5 4 2 O N F— US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension 4 2 3 6 ° o m US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd. T 7 0 ° 0 0, 0 F Ln US 7/Allen Rd. 1L2 2 �0 Ln US 7/Pine Haven 1 L. 4 0 0 f US 7/Bay Road 0 �J _n 0 L 0 —! + 1 ° 0 ° —i ° t I to co LO Cl)US 7/Baldwin Ave. o JL n o ° 0 -. 1 1 0 T m US 7/Fayette Dr. 0 0 L 380 �-- 4 0 39 D t � F US 7/Holmes Rd. Extension r-- J m rn L 1 0 0 ° � o in m US 7/13artlett Bay Rd. 0 J co rl 1L0 ° 0 ° ° ° � r►� t I o Vo US 7/Allen Rd. o J� n n n L ° 0 ° —' 0� 0 t 0 V O r US 7/Pine Haven m (O N ° 0 -� ° °� 0 acoo US 7Bay Road TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2005 AM TRIP DISTRIBUTION, 2005 PM o 0 T o �_ 0 0 0 ~_ 4 0 27 oF_ US 7/Home Avenue o o L 0 0 i r—►- 6 8co US 7/Shelbume Rd Plaza (Seers) o to Lo o 0 0 177 —i 001 t oF US 7/I-189 Ramp C o N m o 0 p � 41 0 —i O t N N US 7/Swift Street o v m o 0 .�1L 0 —� 0 �— 0 i-r►— 0 —� 32Lo o N o US 7/Queen City Park Rd. o 0 c o - 0 .�1L 0 0 �— 0 3 36 N N O� co US 7113rewer Parkway o J L o L 0 0 1 �— o 0 11 —i O co US 7/1-aurel Hill Dr. o n o �. 0 0 --1# 0 No �0 N cb US 7/Home Avenue o r, J1L o 0 � 0 0 —� 0 0 N t O co O US 7/Shelburne Rd Plaza (Sears) JL 0 �— 0 0 0 —� 3 7� o t 0 0F US 711-189 Ramp C O O 0 .�1L 0 0 -� , 00 r�► t I co N N US 7/Swift Street _N 0 0 L 0 0 0 1 �� o t1f- rnrn o� N US 7/Queen City Park Rd. o m o J L 1 L— p 1 o 0 —:A 0 IN 0 � —1 m rn �F N US 7/Brewer Parkway JL 0 0 o t US 7/Laurel Hill Dr. APPENDIX C LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ANALYSES RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 32 20 220 19 Base Year = 1998 TH 11 8 1051 560 Final Year = 1998 RT 137 24 7 17 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 32 20 220 19 TH 11 8 1051 560 Controller = semi actuated RT 137 24 7 17 CBD? N TOTAL 180 53 1278 595 2106 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 C No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 6 7 3 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 C Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 C Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C Exclusive ]eft -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 C Exclusive right-tum lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.- Pedestrian button? IN IN i� A Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 1( Right turns on red, % = 46 20 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle L.en t: C = 70 sec -SERVICE: EB LT 174 Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 43Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0,101 Green ratio, g/C = 0.271 0.271 Lane Eou2 ca2acity, c = 426 400 Average lane group delay = 14.5 14.9 Lane group LOS = B B 14.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B 12.9 ECTION LOS & DELAY = 'ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet= 90 101 canaciry average queue. feet = 11 17 6 5 WB NB SB LT R L TR L TR 29 19 220 1111 19 605 0.069 0.049 0.649 0.728 0.065 0.430 0.271 0.271 0.200 0.429 0.171 0.400 418 396 339 1527 288 1407 14.4 14.3 22.9 11.8 19.8 10.4 B B C B C B 14.4 13.7 10.7 B B B 85 82 185 217 83 138 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT 22 32 42 5 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 8 8 1253 747 Final Year = 1998 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 22 8 32 8 42 1253 5 747 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 0 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 30 40 1295 752 2117 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 0' 6 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 1 I I I Heavy vehicles, % = 9 8 3 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 1.00 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width =i 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Westbound Left j y Through) y Northbound Left I Y Through Y Y Southbound Left I Y Through Y Y Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 19 10 11 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len Cv = 70 sec SB -SERVICE: EB WB NB Lane group movements = L T L T L T L 5 T 784 Adjusted flow rate = 22 8 32 8 42 1315 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.074 0.028 0.107 0.027 0,138 0.704 0.021 0.469 Green ratio, g/C = 0.186 0.186 0.186 0,186 0.186 0.543 0,143 0.500 Lane group ca aci , c = 296 302 297 305 304 1869 227 1673 Average lane group delay = 17.9 17.7 18.0 17.7 18.1 6.9 19.6 6.8 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B Average approach delay= 17.8 17.9 7.3 6.9 Approach LOS = C C B B ;ECTION LOS &DELAY = B 7.5 sec/veh T ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet 4 94 78 88 78 92 209 77 145 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. intersection: US 7/I-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 709 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 17 488 623 Final Year = 1998 RT 0 529 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 709 0 0 TH 0 17 488 623 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 529 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1255 488 623 23661 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 3 0 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 n 12 n 00 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 29 30 Yellow+All Red =1 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 763 512 686 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.474 0.295 0.271 Green ratio, g/C = 0,457 0.457 0.457 Lane group capacity, c = 1608 1737 2530 Average lane group delay = 10.2 7.5 7.4 Lane group LOS = B B B 10.2 7.5 7.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B 8.5 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 151 118 94 feet RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT 0 185 0 191 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 0 0 1337 1493 Final Year = 1998 RT 0 273 147 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 0 185 0 0 1337 191 1483 Controller = 7semii actuated TH RT 0 273 147 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 458 1484 1675 36171 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 2 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 2 1 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 32 12 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 70 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB L T Lane group movements = L R TR 185 267 1631 191 1557 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.560 0.437 0.612 0.467 0.585 Green ratio, g/C = 0.200 0.414 0.500 0,714 0.714 410 2661 Lane groupcapacity, c = 330 612 2665 7.6 5.6 0.9 Average lane group delay = 11.5 B A Lane group LOS = 77]20.8 C B B 1A Average approach delay= I5.3 7- A Approach LOS = C B INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B 5.7 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 147 176 174 102 158 95th percentile queue, feet = AW.-Moe nueue. feet = _ — RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Q 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 101 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1323 1322 Final Year = 1998 RT 113 0 0 0 GrowtlVyr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 101 0 0 0 TH 0 0 1323 1322 Controller = semi actuated RT 113 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 214 0 1323 1322 2859 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IPft-tam lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =1 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N iv Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 44 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 101 113 1389 1388 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.235 0.294 0.575 0.574 Green ratio, g/C = 0.243 0.243 0.671 0.671 Lane group capacity, c =1 430 385 2418 2418 Average lane group delay = 16.2 16.5 1.9 1.9 Lane group LOS = C C A A 16.4 1.9 1.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A A 3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet —Amity average queue. feet RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. lntersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT Base Year = 1998 11 9 69 15 Base: TH 2 3 1096 1362 Final Year = 1998 RT 122 25 9 34 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT DHV adjust = 1.00 0 0 0 0 Development: 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 TH RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N 11 9 3 69 1096 15 1362 Movement Volumes: LT Controller = semi actuated TH RT 2 122 25 9 34 N TOTAL 2757 as Lost Time Per Phase = 3 135 37 1174 1411 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 2 2 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 N N No, of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N 0 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = N N Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type f 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y 5outhbound Y IThrough Y Y y Y Phase Times: Actual Green =1 10 22 8 8 -- Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len CV = 70 sec WB NB SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB R LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = LT 37 69 1161 15 1431 34 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group We ratio, X = 13 0.056 122 0.216 0.161 0.227 0.565 0,054 0.713 0.038 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.357 0.143 0.171 0.571 0.157 0.557 278 2006 0.557 882 Lane ou aci ,c = 232 565 232 20.0 303 2055 20.4 4.8 20.6 6.4 3.6 Average lane group delay = 19.7 11.9 C A C B A Lane group LOS = C B C 5.7 6.5 Average approach delay= 12.6 20.0 B Approach LOS = B C B INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B 6.6 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 80 113 91 103 171 81 216 82 95th percentile queue, feet = n.,o-nnrim average oueue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction. Vermont m 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 119 36 20 51 Base Year = 1998 TH 5 2 1231 1438 Final Year = 1999 RT 36 104 28 96 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = r N Movement Volumes: LT 119 36 20 51 TH 5 2 1231 1438 Controller = semi actuated RT 36 104 28 96 CBD? I N TOTAL 160 142 1279 1586 31671 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 '10 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn iane width = i2.0 i i.0 0.0 i i.0 rCUCffi Snll buuun? N iv i� iv Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 20 8 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 119 5 36 38 104 20 1322 51 1510 96 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.394 0.014 0.059 0.112 0.341 0.079 0.742 0.184 0.822 0.119 Green ratio, g/C = 0.200 0.200 0.386 0.200 0.200 0.143 0.514 0.157 0.529 0.529 Lane group capacity, c =1 302 360 6111 341 306 253 1783 278 1838 809 Average lane group delay = 18.9 17.1 0.0 17.4 18.5 21.5 8.5 21.0 9.2 4.5 Lane group LOS = C C A C C C B C B A 14.6 18.2 8.7 9.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B C B B B 9.7 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 121 77 86 90 116 83 219 96 236 97 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group. White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Baldwin Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 4 18 14 94 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 6 1120 1236 Final Year = 1998 RT 7 93 37 22 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LTI 4 0 18 6 14 1120 94 1236 Controller = semi actuated THL RT 7 93 37 22 CBD? N' TOTAL 11 117 1171 1351 2649 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Lett y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cvcle Length: Cv = 70 sec .EVEL-OF-SERVICE: EB LR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 11 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.042 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 Lane row capacity, c =1 258 Average lane group delay = 18.4 Lane group LOS = C 18.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C A 1.2 QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =�79 n.Prranariry average queue. feet = WB NB SB LTR L TR L TR 117 14 1215 94 1320 0.466 0.015 0.456 0.259 0.495 0.171 0.743 0.743 0.743 0.743 250 898 2663 363 2669 20.9 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 C A A A A 20.9 0.2 0.2 C A A 122 77 126 87 132 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:00 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = AM Base: LT 65 TH 3 RT 63 Development: LT 0 TH 0 RT 0 11 2 4 0 0 0 37 1131 2 0 0 0 6 1309 50 0 0 0 Base Year = Final Year = GrowdVyr = DHV adjust = Total Growth - Add dev Y/N = 1998 1998 1.00 1.00 1.00 N Movement Volumes: LT 65 TH 3 RT 63 TOTAL 131 11 2 4 17 37 1131 2 1171 6 1309 50 1365 26851 Controller = semi actuated CBD? N Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB Number of approach Lanes = 2 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 Left turn allowed and shared? y Right turn allowed and shared? n Lane width = 12.0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 WB 1 0 0 y y 15.0 0.0 NB 3 1 0 n y 11.0 11.0 SB 3 1 0 n Y 11.0 11.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 2 2 2 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 l .00 0 0 0 0 2 N 0 0 1.00 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =1 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedstrian Pedestrian button? button time, sec = N 10 iv N 10 10 iv 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 30 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane rou ca aci , c =1 EB WB NB SB LT R 68 63 0.159 0.155 0.257 0.257 428 407 LTR 17 0.042 0.257 405 L TR 37 1190 0.074 0.503 0.657 0.657 503 2366 L TR 6 1427 0,011 0.845 0.471 0.471 592 1689 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 15.3 C 15.3 C 14.8 B 6.4 2.1 B A 6.0 12.2 B B 15.3 C 14.8 B 2.2 A 12.2 B B 8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 100 98 81 81 149 77 246 nvercanaciry averaee queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:00 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT Base Year = 1998 29 8 5 229 Base: TH 1 4 1006 968 Final Year = 1998 RT 6 25 33 49 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT DHV adjust = 1.00 0 0 0 0 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = FN 29 8 4 5 1006 229 968 Movement Volumes: LT Controller = semi actuated TH RT 1 6 25 33 49 CBD? N TOTAL 23611 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 36 36 1043 1246 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 4 0 4 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 N N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 0 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 N Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 C cle Len th: Cy = 70 sec NB SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = LTR 12 25 1095 1308 Adjusted flow rate = 36 0.123 0.039 0.090 0.582 0.679 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.171 0.171 0.171 0.586 0.743 Green ratio, g/C = 290 298 277 1882 1925 Lane ou ca aci , c = 18.7 18.4 18.6 4.5 0.7 Average lane group delay = A Lane group LOS = C C C A 0.7 Average approach delay= 18.7 18.5 4.5 A Approach LOS = C C A INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = A 2.9 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 89 80 85 ] 60 132 95th percentile queue, feet = n„o� a ;r. n—moe nueue_ feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build PHASING HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 45 6 26 117 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 906 771 Final Year = 1998 RT 14 25 65 64 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 45 6 26 117 Controller actuated' TH 2 2 906 771 = semi RT 14 25 65 64 CBD? I N TOTAL 61 33 997 952 20431 Lost Time Per Phase = L 3 EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11-01 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exc10E ; e leR_n 1a^e ,•,idrh - n n n.0 n n 0.0 Conflicting Peds. peds/hr =1 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PLAN• Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green =1 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 61 33 1047 1000 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.225 0.123 0.648 0.463 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.586 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 270 271 1 1614 1 2159 Average lane group delay = 19.1 18.7 5.0 0.2 Lane group LOS = C C A A 19.1 18.7 5.0 0.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 3.4 seelveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 99 88 155 112 (lvercanncity averaee aueue, feet = __ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:06 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 AM Peak Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT 0 55 0 79 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 0 0 1188 728 Final Year = 1998 RT 0 140 139 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 0 55 0 0 1188 79 728 Controller= semi actuated TH RT 0 140 139 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 195 1327 807 23291 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 3 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival e= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Westbound Left y Through Right Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y y Through Y y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 38 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length-:__ C = 70 sec SB -SERVICE: EB WB NB T Lane group movements = L 55 R 140 T 1188 R 139 L 79 728 Adjusted flow rate = 0.220 0.624 1.149 0.159 0.124 0.529 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.143 0.143 0.586 0.586 0,771 0.771 Green ratio, g/C = 250 2241 1034 8791 637 1376 Lane group ca aci , c = 25.2 83.7 3.1 15.5 0.2 Average lane group delay = C A Lane group LOS = 7Ej D F A 1.7 Average approach delay= 75.3 A Approach LOS = F iECTION LOS & DELAY = E 45.5 seelveh ANALYSIS: 98 133 103 84 181 95th percentile queue, feet = • nnrity average queue. feet = __ 2503 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis I Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM I Base: LT 45 32 363 23 Base Year = 1998 TH 15 12 1394 764 Final Year = 1998 RT 199 27 4 24 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 45 32 363 23 TH 15 12 1384 764 Controller = semi actuated I RT 199 27 4 24 CBD? I N TOTAL 258 72 1751 811 2892 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive nght-turn lane width =� N I Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 I PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y I Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y I Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 18 12 16 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec I LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB Lane group movements = LT R LT R L TR L TR Adjusted flow rate = 60 199 45 27 363 1458 23 827 I Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.173 0.577 0.131 0.079 0.765 0.831 0.076 0.486 I! Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.488 0.498 0.175 0.475 Lane ou capacity, c = 344 344 341 344 475 1755 299 1703 Average lane group delay = 19.0 22.7 18.8 18.6 18.4 12.4 Lane group LOSC C C C C $ B Average approach delay=�21.8 18.7 13.69.3 L48.9 Approach LOS = C BB INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = 13.3 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 101 196 94 87 203 270 85 171 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Svstems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Base: LT TH RT Development: LT TH RT EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth = Add dev Y/N = PM 1998 1998 1.00, 1.00' 1.00 N 24 19 42 1 7 8 1776 1058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 7 0 19 8 0 42 1776 0 1 1058 0 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT TOTAL Controller = semi actuated CBD? 2936 Lost Time Per Phase = N 3 31 27 1818 1059 LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = Left turn allowed and shared? Right turn allowed and shared? Lane width = Exclusive left -turn lane width = Exclusive right -turn lane width = EB 2 I 0 N N 10.0 11.0 0.0 WB 2 I 0 N N 10.0 11.0 0.0 NB 3 1 0 N N 10.0 10.0 0.0 SB 3 1 0 N N 10.0 10.0 0.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 10 8 3 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 10 10 10 0 5 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Thrnn oh Y Westbound Left I Y Through Y Northbound Left I Y Thrnnah Y Y Southbound Left I Y Through Y Y Phase Times: Actual Green = 3 30 10 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len Cy = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB7 SB L:0.642 Lane group movements = L T L T L T Adjusted flow rate = 24 7 19 8 42 1865 1 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.071 0.021 0.054 0.024 0.157 0.884 0.010 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.213 0,213 0.163 0.613 0.063 Lane rou ca aci ,c = 337 343 345 349 266 2109 100 p delay = Average la7up 19.1 18.917E 21.9 8.17al LLOS = C C C B Averagech delay= 19.1 8.4 ch LOS = C B INTERSECTION LDELAY = B 8.6 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 83 79 94 263 �76213 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 78 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG. Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT TH Base Year = Final Year = 1998 1998 0 814 0 0 0 124 870 1782 RT 0 665 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT TH DHV adjust= Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N 0 0 814 124 0 870 0 1782 Movement Volumes: LT TH Controller = RT 0 665 0 0 CBD?TOTAL [!n 4256 Lost Time Per Phase = 0 1604 870 1782 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 2 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = Left turn allowed and shared? Right turn allowed and shared? Lane width = 0 N N 0.0 0 y N 12.0 0 N N 12.0 0 n Y 12.0 Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = N 0 0 1.00 N N 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 N 0 0 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button'! Pedstrian button time, sec = N 10 N N 10 10 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left I y Through y Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 34 35 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 985 914 1960 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.597 0.520 0.751 Green ratio, g/C = 0.463 0.463 0.463 Lane rou ca aci ,c = 1651 1758 2610 Average lane group delay = 12.6 9.7 11.7 Lane group LOS = B B B Average approach delay= 12.6 9.7 11 Approach LOS = B B B B INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B 11.5 sedveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 210 199 237 r)yercanacity average aueue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build Base: HOURLY VOLUMES: LT TH RT Development: LT TH RT EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth = Add dev YIN = PM 1998 1998 1.00 1.00 1.00 N 0 221 0 212 0 0 1946 1882 0 390 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 0 390 0 1946 199 212 1882 0 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT TOTAL Controller = semi actuated CBD? 4850 Lost Time Per Phase = N 3' 0 611 2145 2094 LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = Left turn allowed and shared? Right turn allowed and shared? Lane width = Exclusive left -rum lane width = Exclusive right -turn lane width = EB 0 0 0 N N 0.0 0.0 0.0 WB 2 1 1 N N 0.0 10.0 10.0 NB 3 0 0 N y 11.0 0.0 0.0 SB 3 1 0 n n 12.0 12.0 0.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 2 2 2 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 10 10 10 0 2 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 37 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len Cv = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: WB Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate =Lane =221 group v/c ratio, X =Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci c =351 Average lane group d 3 Lane group CAverage 71L approach 18.4 Approach CINTERSECTION LOS & DE= B 9.1 seclveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 197 Overca aci avera-e ueue,feet = NB an R TR L T 390 2360 212 1976 0.621 0.885 0.526 0.744 0.425 0.500 0.713 0.713 628 2667 403 2654 15.0 12.6 12.7 1.7 B B B A 12.6 2.8 B A 225 260 109 220 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = PM BaSe: LT TH Base Year = Final Year = 1998 1998 298 0 0 0 0 0 2184 1924 RT 169 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT TH DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N 298 0 0 0 0 2184 0 1924 Movement Volumes: LT TH Controller = semi actuated RT 169 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 4575 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 467 0 2184 1924 LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = EB 2 1 WB 0 0 NB 2 0 SB 2 0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = Left turn allowed and shared? 1 N 0 N 0 N 0 N Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = N 0 N N 0 0 N 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 ✓ Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 12.0 0.0 1 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button'! Pedstrian button time, sec = N 10 N 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left "l hrough y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 50 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cvcle Length: Cy = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = L R Adjusted flow rate = 298 169 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.642 0.407 Green ratio, g/C = 0.263 0.263 Lane group capacity, c = 465 416 Average lane group delay = 22.0 18.9 Lane group LOS = C C Average approach delay= 20.9 Approach LOS = C ;ECTION LOS & DELAY = B 9.1 ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 222 144 nsnacity average queue. feet = WB NB SB T T 2293 2020 0.961 0.847 0.663 0.663 2386 2386 10.3 4.8 B A 10.3 4.8 B A 277 252 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. I Intersection: U5 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build I VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM I Base: LT 120 18 194 48 Base Year = 1998 TH 12 11 1828 1537 Final Year = 1998 RT 218 55 26 98 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 I TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 120 12 18 11 194 1821 48 1117 Controller = TH RT 218 55 26 98 CBD?[7!3 I TOTAL 351 83 2047 1684 416Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB I 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -tarn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 I Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =1 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N I Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped I Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped I Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y Y I Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 18 20 10 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length- C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB T R I Lane group movements = LT R LTR L TR L 48 1614 98 Adjusted flow rate = 132 218 83 194 1946 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.719 0.315 0.374 0.438 0.942 0.168 0.919 0.127 I Green ratio, g/C = 0.150 0.438 0A50 0.250 0.575 0.163 0.488 0.488 Lane ou ca aci = 184 693 223 442 2067 288 1756 772 ,c ay 11.2 23.8 20.0 13.1 23.6 16.1 6.7OS D B C C B C C Blay.5 [:AverageE=33.1 23.8 13.5 15.8 OSC C BC AY15.3 seclveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 138 143 114 181 292 98 292 103 95th percentile queue, feet = (l.,P-nrim sveraQe.oueue. feet = _ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Syrrerns Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build 6:04 PM 12/2/98 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES., VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 248 15 93 110 Base Year = 1998 TH 27 6 1643 1456 Final Year = 1998 RT 114 67 6 314 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth - 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 248 15 93 110 TH 27 6 1643 1456 Controller = semi actuated RT 114 67 6 314 CBD? N TOTAL 389 88 1742 1880 40991 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = l 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 11.0 11.0 ] 0.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival t - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped 8 29 8 12 Phase Times: Actual Green = Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 79 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = L T R Adjusted flow rate = 248 27 114 21 67 93 1731 110 1529 314 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.877 0.085 0.211 0.072 0.247 0.415 0.875 0.446 0.755 0.352 Green ratio, g/C = 0.177 0.177 0.342 0A77 0.177 0.127 0.570 0.139 0.582 0.582 Lane group capacity, c = 283 319 541 293 271 224 1980 246 2025 891 Average lane group delay = 41.6 20.6 0.0 20.6 21.4 27.0 9.7 26.5 6.6 4.1 Lane group LOS = E C A C C D B D B A Average approach delay= 28.0 21.2 10.6 7.3 Approach LOS = D C B B INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B 11 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 212 87 116 84 105 120 267 127 238 147 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mcintosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT Base Year = 1998 29 14 5 35 TH 0 0 1566 1300 Final Year = 1999 RT 16 50 15 15 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT DHV adjust= 1.00 0 0 0 0 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N 29 0 14 0 5 1566 35 1300 Movement Volumes: LT TH Controller = semi actuated RT 16 50 15 15 CBD? N TOTAL 3045 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 45 64 1586 1350 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0' Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, % = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 ILO PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y RiRhti y Northbound4Right Southbound Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 54 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Length: C v = 80 sec _ -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = LR Adjusted flow rate = 45 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.140 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 = Lane gMZEaE2a 322 ,c = Average la7group La= = = L= 19.4 19.4 CAverage A 1.8 C>ECTION ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 95 -miry average queue, feet = WB NB SB LR L TR L TR 64 5 1660 35 1381 0.210 0.005 0.648 0.058 0.539 0.213 0.713 0.713 0.713 0.713 304 1011 2562 609 2562 19.8 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.0 C A A A A 19.8 1.2 1.0 C A _ A 103 76 195 81 160 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:57 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mclntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 107 15 90 11 Base Year = 1998 TH 11 5 1747 1483 Final Year = 1998 RT 70 17 11 88 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 107 15 90 11 TH 11 5 1747 1483 Controller = semi actuated RT 70 17 11 88 CBD? N TOTAL 188 37 1848 1582 36551 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF= 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 _�. ._ , : ,th _ n n n n n n n PP lrcttian himno7 N N N N uSi Jc u�yu,-wiu .a..,. wsw —1 Pedstrian -'------ ------ button time, sec = - 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 40 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 118 70 37 90 1845 11 1650 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.332 0.197 0,109 0.297 0.733 0.017 0.859 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.700 0.700 0.539 0.538 Lane group capacity, C = 355 356 335 304 2519 633 1920 Average lane group delay = 19.9 19.1 18.7 8.2 2.0 4.6 10.8 Lane group LOS = C C C B A A B 19.6 18.7 2.3 10.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A B B 7 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 126 105 91 90 216 78 274 C)vrrranariry average oueue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:57 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM LT Base Year = 1998 165 66 9 28 Base: TH 2 3 1336 1208 Final Year = 1999 RT 22 256 9 25 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT DHV adjust = 1.00 0 0 0 0 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N 165 2 66 3 9 1336 28 1208 Movement Volumes: LT Controller = semi actuated TH RT 22 256 9 25 CBD? N TOTAL 3129 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 189 325 1354 1261 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB' 0 0 0 0 4 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through y Rlight Y Westbound y Thro Y R Y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 38 20 6 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 5 C cle Len the C = 80 sec NB SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = LTR 69 256 1422 1324 Adjusted flow rate = 189 0.522 0.208 0.576 0.887 0.737 Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = 0.275 0.275 0.275 0.513 0.713 Lane ou ca aci , c = 362 332 4441 1603 1795 1.9 Average lane group delay = 19.8 17.0 20.4 13.5 A Lane group LOS = C C C B 1.9 Average approach delay= 19.8 19.7 13.5 A Approach LOS = C C B INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B 9.8 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 176 103 203 255 156 95th percentile queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 6:04 PM 12/2/98 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont ® 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 212 0 113 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 942 1252 Final Year = 1998 RT 0 105 114 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 212 0 113 TH 0 0 942 1252 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 105 114 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 317 1056 1366 2739 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 T1 0 Ar Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 1 2.0 i i.0 0.0 17 cursulwi ul1LLU11? N 1, Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 42 14 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec C cle Len h: C , = LEVEL-OF-SERVICE:EB WB NB SB Lane group movemen]_�� L R T R L T Adjusted flow ra 212 105 942 114 113 1252 Lane group v/c ratio, 0.605 0.185 0.949 0.095 0.376 0.969 Green ratio, g 0.200 0.363 0.563 0.800 0.725 0.725 ca aci 350 568 993 1201 301 1293 roup delay = 24.3 13.3 18.7 0.0 10.0 12.2 group LOS = C B C A B B roach delay= ==wTERSECTION 20.7 16.7 12.0 roach LOS = C C B & DELAY = BE 14.8 sedveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 194 112 329 88 92 291 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Sysrerns Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build 6:04 PM 12/2/98 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB V✓B NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 125 58 38 32 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 10 1078 1102 Final Year = 1998 RT 53 155 28 82 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1,00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 125 58 10 38 1078 32 1102 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 7 53 155 28 82 CBD? N TOTAL 185 223 1144 1217 2768 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB LANE GEOMETRY: EB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0 16L00 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 d S F 7 R - Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Left y Through y Right y Ped Left EPhoause y y Through y y Right y y Ped Actual Green = 19 6 39 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB Lane group movements = LTR LTR LTR LTR Adjusted flow rate = 185 223 1201 1278 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.780 0.602 0.914 0.593 Green ratio, g/C = 0.263 0.263 0.525 0.663 Lane group capacity, c = 23.7 370 1314 2156 Average lane group delay = 31.1 21.6 15.3 25 . Lane group LOS = D C C A Average approach delay= 31.1 21.6 15.3 25 Approach LOS = D C C A ;ECTION LOS & DELAY = B 11.2 seciveh ANALYSIS: l70 95th percentile queue, feet = 176 191 221 —narity average queue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Design Hour - No Build 12:57 PM 1/21/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 22 66 2 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 917 1181 Final Year = 1998 RT 19 30 22 19 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust= 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 22 66 2 25 TH 1 1 917 1181 Controller = semi actuated RT 19 30 22 19 CBD? I N TOTAL 42 97 941 1225 23041 Lost Time Per Phase = L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 1 1 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 z e S F I R irnn�uvv rt.nw. - - Eastbound 1.eft y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 61 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 Cycle Length: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c =1 C = 80 sec EB WB NB SB LTR 42 0.227 0.125 184 LTR 97 0.486 0.125 1 200 LTR 941 0.708 0.800 1328 LTR 1225 1.041 0.800 1177 ge lane group delay =E.1 Lane group LOS =C rage approach delay=.1 Approach LOS =C LINTERSECTION 26.3 D 0.9 A 28.5 D 26.3 D 0.928.5 A D C 17.1 sec/veh LOS & DELAY = YSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 95 122 205 0,P,r.nnnciry average queue. feet = 852 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:57 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 1998 Desijzn Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 118 55 37 30 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 9 1023 1047 Final Year = 1998 RT 50 146 26 78 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 118 55 9 37 1023 30 1047 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 7 50 146 26 78 CBD? N TOTAL 176 210 1086 1155 2627 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0! Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 6 4 No. of exclusive left -tam lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 N N No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 ,Arrival ty — 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 50 Yellow+A11 Red = 5 6 Cvcle Len C = 80 sec SB -SERVICE: EB WB L NB TR L T R'' Lane group movements = LTR LTR 210 37 1049 30 1047 78 Adjusted flow rate = 176 0.681 0.607 0.078 0.917 0.055 0.895 0.079 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0-263 0.263 0,663 0.663 0,663 0.663 0.663 Green ratio, g/C = 258 346 476 1144 544 1170 994 Lane groupcapacity, , c = 22.0 18.9 3.1 15.9 3A1 13B 3A1 Average lane group delay = C Lane group LOS = C C A 12.8 Average approach delay= 22.0 18.9 15.5 B Approach LOS = C C C iECTION LOS & DELAY = B 15 sec/veh ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 147 186 82 297 81 296 9( RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont C 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 33 21 224 19 Base Year = 1998 TH 11 9 1072 571 Final Year = 2000 RT 140 25 8 17 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 11 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 33 21 224 19 TH 11 9 1072 571 Controller = semi actuated RT 140 25 8 17 CBD? N TOTAL 184 54 1304 6071 2149 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 6 7 3 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =1 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.01 Pedestrian button % iv IN N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 46 20 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 10 11 17 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 44 75 29 20 224 1133 19 618 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.104 0.189 0.071 0.050 0.662 0.742 0.066 0.439 Green ratio, g/C = 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.200 0.429 0.171 0.400 Lane group ca aci , c = 425 400 417 396 339 1527 288 1407 Average lane group delay = 14.5 14.9 14.4 14.3 23.2 12.0 19.8 10.5 Lane group LOS = B B B B C B C B 14.8 14.4 13.9 10.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B B 13.1 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 91 102 85 82 187 220 83 140 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont U 19go KNti, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 22 32 43 5 Base Year = 1998 TH 9 9 1278 762 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 15 Total Growth - 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 22 32 43 5 TH 9 9 1278 762 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 31 41 1321 767 21591 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 9 8 3 6 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 19 10 11 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: Cy = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T L T L T L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 22 9 32 9 43 1342 5 800 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.074 0.028 0.109 0.028 0.141 0.718 0.021 0.478 Green ratio, g/C = 0.186 0.186 0.186 0.186 0.186 0.543 0.143 0.500 Lane group ca aci ,c = 296 302 297 305 304 1869 227 1673 Average lane group delay = 17.9 17.7 18.0 17.7 18.1 7.0 19.6 6.8 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 17.8 17.9 7.4 6.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 7.6 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 84 78 88 78 92 212 77 147 95th percentile queue, feet = overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- ACM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/I-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build 12:12 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 723 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 18 498 636 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 540 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 18 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 16 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 723 0 0 TH 0 18 498 636 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 540 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1281 498 636 24141 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 01 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 3 0 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .. C_1... ivc "Oft -tam. !are "vi,.W, _ A 1) 17 n n n n n ('— irtina Pprls ne,lc/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =�0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button. N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 perAQ1V( PLAN- Phase-> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 29 30 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 70 sec F-SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca acity, c = Average lane group delay = _ Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B 8.6 SECTION LOS & DELAY = 3 ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = rcanacity averaee queue, feet = WB NB SB LT T TR 778 522 700 0.484 0.301 0.277 0.457 0.457 0.457 1608 1737 2530 10.3 7.5 7.4 B B B 10.3 7.5 7.4 B B — B 153 119 95 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSU, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 189 0 195 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1364 1513 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 278 150 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 2 34 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 189 0 195 TH 0 0 1364 1513 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 278 150 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 467 1514 1708 36901 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, % = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 2 1 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 32 12 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 189 273 1664 195 1589 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.572 0.446 0.624 0.477 0.597 Green ratio, g/C = 0.200 0.414 0.500 0,714 0.714 Lane group ca aci , c = 330 612 2665 410 2661 Average lane group delay = 21.0 11.5 7.7 5.8 0.9 Lane group LOS = C B B B A 15.4 7.7 1.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B 5.8 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 148 178 176 102 160 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 103 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1350 1349 Final Year = 2000 RT 115 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 2 39 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 000TH0 EO 1350 1349 Controller = semi actuated RT0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 218 0 1350 1349L_jH2J Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, %n = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 44 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 103 115 1417 1416 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.240 0.300 0.586 0.586 Green ratio, g/C = 0.243 0.243 0.671 0.671 Lane group capacity, c = 430 385 2418 2418 Average lane group delay = 16.2 16.6 1.9 1.9 Lane group LOS = C C A A 16.4 1.9 1.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A A 3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 113 117 163 163 Overcapacity averse queue feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB_ SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 11 10 70 15 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1118 1390 Final Year = 2000 RT 124 26 10 34 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = I.00 TH 0 0 3 42 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 4 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT I 1 10 70 15 TH 2 3 1118 1390 Controller = semi actuated RT 124 26 10 34 CBD? N TOTAL 137 38 1198 1439 28131 Lost Time Per Phase = 1 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 22 8 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C - LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 13 124 38 70 1184 15 1459 34 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.056 0.220 0.164 0.232 0.576 0.055 0,727 0.039 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.357 0.143 0.171 0.571 0.157 0.557 0.557 Lane group ca aci , c = 231 565 232 303 2055 278 2006 882 Average lane group delay = 19.7 12.0 20.0 20.4 4.9 20.6 6.6 3.6 Lane group LOS = C B C C A C B A 12.7 20.0 5.8 6.7 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B C B B B 6.8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 80 114 91 103 173 81 220 82 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction. Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 121 37 20 52 Base Year = 1998 TH 5 2 1256 1467 Final Year = 2000 RT 37 106 29 98 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 46 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 121 37 20 52 TH 5 2 1256 1467 Controller = semi actuated RT 37 106 29 98 CBD? N TOTAL 163 145 1305 1618 3231 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.11-ve 11cf-um, lace ':'idth = 1 1,n 0.0 12.0 1�.(1 (�.nnFlictino Peds. neds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right tutus on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 24 8 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 121 5 37 39 106 20 1349 52 1541 98 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.562 0.020 0.071 0.161 0.486 0.081 0.681 0.188 0.757 0.110 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0.329 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.571 0.157 0.586 0.586 Lane group ca aci , c = 215 257 520 241 219 253 1981 278 2037 896 Average lane group delay = 23.7 19.6 0.0 20.0 22.4 21.5 5.6 21.0 5.9 3.0 Lane group LOS = C C A C C C B C B A 18.2 21.8 5.8 6.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 7.3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =FT2_5_ 77 87 91 119 84 203 96 218 95 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 4 18 14 96 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 6 1142 1260 Final Year = 2000 RT 7 95 38 22 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 48 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 4 18 14 96 TH 0 6 1142 1260 Controller = semi actuated RT 7 95 38 22 CBD? N TOTAL 11 119 1194 1378 27031 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Length: Cv = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB LR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 11 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.043 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 Lane group capacity, c = 257 Average lane group delay = 18.4 Lane group LOS = C 18.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 79 0vP.rrnnariry average oueue. feet = WB NB SB LTR L TR L TR 119 14 1239 96 1346 0.475 0.016 0.465 0,268 0.505 0.171 0.743 0.743 0.743 0.743 250 894 2663 358 2669 21.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 C A A A A 21.0 0.2 0.2 C A A 123 77 127 87 134 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:01 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 71Mclntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 66 11 38 7 Base Year = 1998 TH 3 2 1154 1335 Final Year = 2000 RT 64 4 2 51 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 54 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 66 11 38 7 TH 3 2 1154 1335 Controller = semi actuated RT 64 4 2 51 CBD? N TOTAL 134 17 1195 1393 2738 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -rum lane width =1 i i.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Yedestnan button'! N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 30 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 69 64 17 38 1214 7 1456 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.162 0.158 0.043 0.077 0.513 0.011 0.862 Green ratio, g/C = 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.657 0.657 0.471 0.471 Lane group capacity, c = 428 407 404 494 2366 590 1689 Average lane group delay = 15.3 15.3 14.8 6.6 2.1 6.0 12.8 Lane group LOS = C C B B A B B 15.3 14.8 2.2 12.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B B 8.3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 100 98 81 81 151 77 250 Overcapacity average queue,feet = 12:12 PM 1/19/99 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 30 8 5 234 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 4 1026 987 Final Year = 2000 RT 6 25 33 50 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 57 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 1 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 3 3 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 30 8 5 234 TH 1 4 1026 987 Controller = semi actuated RT 6 25 33 50 CBD? N TOTAL 37 37 1064 1271 2409 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 37 12 25 1117 1334 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.127 0.039 0.048 0.595 0.707 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.171 290 0.171 297 0.329 531 0.586 1879 0.743 1887 Average lane group delay = 18.7 18.4 12.2 4.5 0.8 Lane group LOS = C C B A A 18.7 14.2 4.5 0.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A A A 2.9 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 90 80 83 163 133 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build 12:12 PM 1/19/99 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 46 7 26 119 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 924 787 Final Year = 2000 RT 14 26 66 65 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 7 1 Total Growth = 1.0C RT 0 0 5 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 46 7 26 119 TH 2 2 924 787 Controller =I!n RT 14 26 66 65 CBD?TOTAL 62 34 1017 971 2084 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 C No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 C Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 C Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 I PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0C Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 C Exclusive right -turn lane width 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 1C Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 62 34 1068 1020 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.230 0.126 0.663 0.478 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.586 0.743 r ,... ,. _ Iro I'M 1 rf)o 1)1 i(, Average lane group delay = 19.1 18.7 5.1 0.2 Lane group LOS = C C B A 19.1 18.7 5.1 0.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B A A 3.5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = nvercanacity average queue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:58 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 56 0 81 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1212 743 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 142 141 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 7 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 56 0 81 TH 0 0 1212 743 Controller = semi actuated RTI:: 0 142 141 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 199 1354 823 23761 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY.- EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y y Through Y y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 40 6 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T R L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 56 142 1212 141 81 743 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.224 0.636 1.118 0.153 0.138 0.540 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0.614 0.614 0.771 0.771 Lane group capacity, c = 250 224 1085 922 582 1376 Average lane group delay = 20.3 25.5 65.9 2.4 16.7 0.3 Lane group LOS = C D F A C A 24.0 59.3 1.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C E A D 36.5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 98 134 101 84 183 Overcapacity average queue,feet = 2110 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:01 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-ocust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM 24 13 34 23 Base: LT Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 614 736 Final Year = 2000 RT 2 25 34 23 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 6 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = r N 24 13 34 23 Movement Volumes: LT TH 0 1 614 736 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 25 34 23 CBD? N TOTAL 26 39 682 783 1531 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = EB I WB 1 NB l SB 1 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Len CY = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB LR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 26 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.097 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 Lane group capacity, c = 270 WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR 39 682 783 0.143 0.724 0.710 0.171 0.743 0.743 275 942 1103 Average lane group delay = 18.6 18.7 1.6 1.3 Lane group LOS = C C A A 18.6 18.7 1.6 1.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 2.2 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 83 3 5 20 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 619 512 Final Year = 2000 RT 13 8 6 53 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 1 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 5 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 83 3 5 20 TH 0 0 619 512 Controller = semi actuated RT 13 8 6 53 CBD? N TOTAL 96 11 631 584 13231 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: ActualGreen=1 15 43 Yellow+All Red = 6 6 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 96 11 5 626 20 512 53 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.226 0.029 0.006 0.550 0.027 0.441 0.054 Green ratio, g/C = 0.257 0.257 0.657 0.657 0.657 0.657 0.657 Lane group capacity, c = 426 367 904 1137 720 1161 986 Average lane group delay = 13.3 12.6 2.7 4.6 2.7 3.9 2.8 Lane group LOS = B B A A A A A 13.3 12.6 4.6 3.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B A A A 4.9 sedveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 110 79 76 204 78 185 84 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 33 21 224 19 Base Year = 1998 TH 11 9 1072 571 Final Year = 2000 RT 140 25 8 17 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 11 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 21 224 19 TH9 El 1073 582 Controller = semi actuated RT25 8 17 CBD? N TOTAL 187 54 1305 618 21641 Lost Time Per Phase = 1 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 6 7 3 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = I 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 QO rcuesuiau uutt06? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 l0 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 46 20 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 10 11 17 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 44 77 29 20 224 1134 19 629 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.104 0.193 0.071 0.050 0.662 0.743 0.066 0,447 Green ratio, g/C = 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.200 0.429 0.171 0.400 Lane group ca aci ,c = 425 400 417 396 339 1527 288 1407 Average lane group delay = 14.5 14.9 14.4 14.3 23.2 12.1 19.8 10.5 Lane group LOS = B B B B C B C B 14.8 14.4 14.0 10.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B B 13.1 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 91 102 85 82 187 220 83 142 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 22 32 43 5 Base Year = 1998 TH 9 9 1278 762 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 15 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 22 33 43 5 TH 9 9 1279 777 Controller semi actuated RT 0 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 31 42 1322 782 21761 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 9 8 3 6 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 19 10 11 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T L T L T L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 22 9 33 9 43 1343 5 816 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.074 0.028 0.112 0.028 0.141 0.718 0.021 0.488 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.186 296 0.186 302 0.186 0.186 297 305 0.186 0.543 304 1869 0.143 0.500 227 1673 Average lane group delay = 17.9 17.7 18.0 17.7 18.1 7.1 19.6 6.9 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 17.8 17.9 7.5 7.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 7.7 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 84 78 88 78 92 212 77 149 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/I-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 723 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 18 498 636 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 540 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 18 0 0 DHVadjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 16 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 741 0 0 TH 0 18 499 652 Controller =L::n RT 0540 0 0 CBD?TOTAL 0 1299 499 652 2449 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 3 0 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 29 30 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 797 523 717 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.496 0.301 0.283 Green ratio, g/C = 0.457 0.457 0.457 Lane group capacity, c = 1608 1737 2530 Average lane group delay = 10.3 7.5 7.5 Lane group LOS = B B B 10.3 7.5 7.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B 8.6 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 155 119 96 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 189 0 195 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1364 1513 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 278 150 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 2 34 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 193 0 195 TH 0 0 1366 1547 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 278 150 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 471 1516 1742 37301 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 2 1 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 32 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 193 273 1666 195 1624 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.584 0.446 0.625 0.477 0.610 Green ratio, g/C = 0,200 0.414 0.500 0,714 0.714 Lane group capacity, c = 330 612 2665 410 2661 Average lane group delay = 21.2 11.5 7.7 5.8 1.0 Lane group LOS = C B B B A 15.5 7.7 1.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B 5.8 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 150 178 177 102 163 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 103 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1350 1349 Final Year = 2000 RT 115 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 2 39 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LTEO 0 0 0 TH 0 1352 1388 Controller1-:n RT 0 0 0 CBD? TOTAL 221 0 1352 1388 2961 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 44 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 103 118 1419 1457 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.240 0.307 0.587 0.603 Green ratio, g/C = 0.243 0.243 0.671 0.671 Lane group capacity, c = 430 385 2418 2418 Average lane group delay = 16.2 16.6 1.9 2.0 Lane group LOS = C C A A 16.4 1.9 2.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A A 3 secIveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 113 118 163 166 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 11 10 70 15 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1118 1390 Final Year = 2000 RT 124 26 10 34 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 42 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 4 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT I 1 10 70 15 TH 2 3 1121 1432 Controller = semi actuated RT 128 26 10 34 CBD? N TOTAL 141 38 1201 1481 2862 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 I Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive fight -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 22 S 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: CY = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane ou ca a itV,c = EB WB NB SB LT R 13 128 0.056 0.227 0.143 0.357 231 565 LTR 38 0.164 0.143 232 L TR 70 1187 0.232 0.578 0.171 0.571 303 2055 L T 15 1503 0.055 0.749 0.157 0.557 278 2006 R 34', 0.039' 0.557 882 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 19.7 C 12.0 B 20.0 C 20.4 C 4.9 A 20.6 C 6.8 B 3.6 A 12.7 B 20.0 C 5.8 B 6.9 B B 6.9 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 80 115 91 103 174 81 224 82 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB 121 37 20 52 Base: LT TH 5 2 1256 1467 RT 37 106 29 98 0 1 0 0 Development: LT TH 0 0 3 46 RT 1 0 0 0 20 52 Movement Volumes: LT TH2 E2138 1259 1513 RT106 29 98 164 146 1308 1664 TOTAL LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB 3 2 3 4 Number of approach Lanes = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = l 0 1 l No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 PHASING PLAN - Eastbound Westbound Phase -> 1 2 3 Left y Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 24 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Length: Cy = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 121 5 38 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.564 0.020 0.073 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0.329 t- ;h,,,- ?,a ')5'7 S?n 12:13 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = AM Base Year = 1998 Final Year = 2000 Growth/yr = 1.00 DHV adjust = 1.00 Total Growth = 1.00 Add dev Y/N - Controller = semi actuated CBD? N 3282 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Grade, % = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 Adjacent parking? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 4 5 6 7 8 y y y y y y y y y 8 8 6 5 WB NB SB LT R L TR L T R 40 106 20 1352 52 1589 98 0.165 0.486 0.081 0.682 0.188 0.780 0.110 0.143 0,143 0.143 0,571 0.157 0.586 0.586 ')al 1)1a os"z MR1 77R 2n37 996 Average lane group delay = 23.8 19.6 0.0 20.0 22.4 21.5 5.6 21.0 6.2 3.0 Lane group LOS = C C A C C C B C B A 18.2 21.7 5.8 6.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 7.5 seelveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 125 77 87 92 119 84 203 96 223 95 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1 / 19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Baldwin Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 4 18 14 96 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 6 1142 1260 Final Year = 2000 RT 7 95 38 22 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 48 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 4 19 14 96 TH 0 6 1145 1308 Controller = semi actuated RT 7 95 38 22 CBD? N TOTAL 11 120 1197 1426 2755 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red =1 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 11 120 14 1243 96 1397 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.043 0.479 0.016 0.467 0.268 0.523 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.743 0.743 0.743 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 257 250 894 2663 358 2669 Average lane group delay = 18.4 21.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 Lane group LOS = C C A A A A 18.4 21.0 0.2 0.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 1.2 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 79 123 77 128 87 137 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:01 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 66 11 38 7 Base Year = 1998 TH 3 2 1154 1335 Final Year = 2000 RT 64 4 2 51 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 54 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 3 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 66 11 38 7 TH 3 2 1157 1389 Controller = semi actuated RT 67 4 2 51 CBD? N TOTAL 137 17 1198 1447 27981 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 30 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 69 67 17 38 1217 7 1512 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.162 0.165 0.043 0.078 0.515 0.011 0.895 Green ratio, g/C = 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.657 0.657 0.471 0.471 Lane group capacity, c = 428 407 404 488 2366 590 1689 Average lane group delay = 15.3 15.3 14.8 7.2 2.1 6.0 14.1 Lane group LOS = C C B B A B B 15.3 14.8 2.3 14.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B B 9.1 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 100 99 81 81 151 77 257 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 30 8 5 234 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 4 1026 987 Final Year = 2000 RT 6 25 33 50 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 57 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 1 0 0 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 3 3 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 30 8 5 291 TH 1 5 1026 987 Controller = semi actuated RT1 6 28 36 50 CBD? N TOTAL 37 41 1067 1328 2473 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y, Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 40 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 37 13 28 1121 1394 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.154 0.052 0.059 0.571 0.751 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0,300 0.614 0.771 Lane group ca aci , c = 239 246 485 1964 1856 Average lane group delay = 20.0 19.7 13.3 3.5 0.9 Lane group LOS = C C B A A 20.0 15.3 3.5 0.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 2.5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 90 80 85 155 127 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal Y5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mm Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 46 7 26 119 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 924 787 Final Year = 2000 RT 14 26 66 65 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 7 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 5 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 46 8 26 119 TH 2 2 931 788 Controller = semi actuated RT 14 26 71 65 CBD? N TOTAL 62 35 1029 972 2098 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No, of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 62 35 1080 1021 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.231 0.130 0.671 0.481 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.586 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 269 270 1610 2121 Average lane group delay = 19.1 18.7 5.2 0.2 Lane group LOS = C C B A 19.1 18.7 5.2 0.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B A A 3.5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet feet RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 11:24 AM 2/16/99 Resource Svstems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 56 0 81 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1212 743 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 142 141 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 7 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 56 0 81 TH 0 0 1219 744 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 143 141 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 200 1361 824 2385 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width — 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y y Through Y y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 46 2 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T R L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 56 143 1219 141 81 744 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.280 0.801 0.986 0.134 0.144 0.521 Green ratio, g/C = 0.114 0.114 0.700 0.700 0.800 0.800 Lane ou ca acitv, c = 200 179 1236 1051 560 1427 Average lane group delay = 21.8 37.9 16.3 0.7 11.0 0.2 Lane group LOS = C D C A B A 33.4 14.7 1.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D B A B 11.6 seelveh NTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 99 137 278 96 83 147 nvrrrnnnrity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:01 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 24 13 34 23 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 614 736 Final Year = 2000 RT 2 25 34 23 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 6 I Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 24 13 34 23 TH 0 1 620 737 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 25 34 23 CBD? N TOTAL 26 39 688 784 15381 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 1 1 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN. Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 26 39 688 784 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.097 0,143 0.730 0.713 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.743 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 270 275 943 1100 Average lane group delay = 18.6 18.7 1.7 1.3 Lane group LOS = C C A A 18.6 18.7 1.7 1.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = A 2.2 see/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 91 186 198 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:13 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 83 3 5 20 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 619 512 Final Year = 2000 RT 13 8 6 53 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 1 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 5 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 84 3 5 20 TH 0 0 624 513 Controller = semi actuated RT 13 8 6 53 CBD? N TOTAL 97 11 636 585 13301 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 15 43 Yellow+All Red = 6 6 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 97 11 5 631 20 513 53 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.229 0.029 0.006 0.555 0.028 0,442 0.054 Green ratio, g/C = 0.257 0.257 0.657 0.657 0.657 0.657 0.657 Lane group capacity,c = 426 367 904 1137 717 1161 986 Average lane group delay = 13.3 12.6 2.7 4.6 2.7 3.9 2.8 Lane group LOS = B B A A A A A 13.3 12.6 4.6 3.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B A A A 5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 110 79 76 205 78 l85 84 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont O 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 46 33 370 23 Base Year = 1998 TH 15 13 1412 779 Final Year = 2000 RT 203 28 4 24 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 2 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 8 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 370 23 E4633 TH13 1412 779 Controller = semi actuated RT28 4 24 CBD? N TOTAL 264 73 1787 827 29501 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - I1.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 18 12 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 61 203 46 28 370 1487 23 844 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.177 0.589 0.135 0.080 0.780 0.847 0.078 0.495 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.488 0.488 0.175 0.475 Lane group ca aci , c = 343 344 339 344 475 1755 299 1703 Average lane group delay = 19.0 23.0 18.8 18.6 19.0 12.9 22.4 8.9 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 22.1 18.7 14.2 9.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 13.6 seciveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 101 187 95 87 205 274 86 173 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 24 19 42 1 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 8 1812 1080 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 10 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 1 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 24 19 42 1 TH 7 8 1812 1080 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 31 28 1854 1081 29941 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, % = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 I 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 10 8 3 5 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =, 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 3 30 10 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T L T L T L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 24 7 19 8 42 1903 1 1134 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.071 0.022 0.055 0.024 0.160 0.902 0.011 0.655 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.163 0.613 0.063 0.513 Lane group ca aci ,c = 337 343 345 349 266 2109 100 1731 Average lane group delay = 19.1 18.9 19.1 19.0 21.9 8.8 26.7 8.6 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B D B 19.1 19.1 9.1 8.6 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 9.1 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet f--i6 78 83 79 95 267 76Overca aci averse ueue, feet RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/I-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 830 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 127 888 1818 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 678 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 11 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 830 0 0 TH 0 127 888 1818 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 678 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1636 888 18181 4341 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 2 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 34 35 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 1005 932 2000 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.609 0.530 0.766 Green ratio, g/C = 0.463 0.463 0.463 Lane group capacity, c = 1651 1758 2610 Average lane group delay = 12.7 9.7 11.9 Lane group LOS = B B B 12.7 9.7 11.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B 11.6 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 213 202 241 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 225 0 216 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1985 1920 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 398 203 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 28 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 3 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 225 0 216 TH 0 0 1985 1920 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 398 203 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 623 2188 2136 49471 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2I No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left tam allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 37 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB L R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 225 398 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.642 0.633, Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.425 Lane group capacity, c = 351 628 Average lane group delay = 24.6 15.2 Lane group LOS = C C 18.6 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B 9.5 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =� 199 227 overcapacity averaee queue, feet = NB SB TR L T 2407 216 2016 0.903 0.537 0.759 0.500 0.713 0.713 2667 403 2654 13.3 13.2 1.8 B B A 13.3 3.0 B A 265 110 223 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 304 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 2228 1963 Final Year = 2000 RT 173 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 31 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 304 0 0 0 TH 0 0 2228 1963 Controller = semi actuated RT 173 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 477 0 2228 1963 46671 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY., EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 15 54 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 304 173 2339 2061 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.808 0.513 0.912 0.803 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0,213 0,713 0.713 ou Lane rcapacity, c = 376 336 2566 2566 Average lane group delay = 31.3 22.3 4.5 2.2 Lane group LOS = D C A A 28.0 4.5 2.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D A A B 5.9 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 233 176 249 227 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:19 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 122 18 198 49 Base Year = 1998 TH 13 12 1864 1568 Final Year = 2000 RT 223 56 26 100 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 3 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 31 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 122 18 198 49 TH 13 12 1864 1568 Controller = semi actuated RT 223 56 26 100 CBD? N TOTAL 357 85 2088 1717 4248 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 30 8 10 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 135 223 85 198 1985 49 1647 100 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0,739 0.417 0.383 0.744 0.921 0.203 0.778 0.107 Green ratio, g/C = 0.150 0.338 0.150 0.150 0.600 0.138 0.588 0.588 Lane group capacity, c = 182 534 222 265 2156 243 2116 930 Average lane group delay = 34.5 15.8 23.9 32.4 10.3 25.4 6.8 3.3 Lane group LOS = D C C D B D B A 22.8 23.9 12.4 7.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 11.4 seclveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 139 182 115 193 283 99 251 98 overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:20 PM 1 / 19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 253 15 95 112 Base Year = 1998 TH 28 6 1676 1485 Final Year = 2000 RT 116 68 6 320 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 2 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 34 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = N Movement Volumes: LT 253 15 95 112 TH 28 6 1676 1485 Controller = semi actuated RT 116 68 6 320 CBD? N TOTAL 397 90 1777 1918 4181 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - I i .0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 29 8 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 79 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 253 28 116 21 68 95 1766 112 1560 320 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.896 0.086 0.215 0.073 0.252 0.424 0,892 0.455 0.770 0,359 Green ratio, g/C = 0.177 0.177 0.342 0.177 0.177 0.127 0.570 0.139 0.582 0.582 Lane group ca aci , c = 282 319 541 293 271 224 1980 246 2025 891 Average lane group delay = 44.2 20.6 0.0 20.6 21.4 27.1 10.4 26.6 6.8 4.2 Lane group LOS = E C A C C D B D B A 29.6 21.2 11.3 7.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C B B B 11.5 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 214 87 117 85 106 120 271 128 241 148 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:21 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 30 14 5 36 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1597 1326 Final Year = 2000 RT 16 51 15 15 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust= 1.00 TH 0 0 36 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 30 14 5 36 TH 0 0 1597 1326 Controller = semi actuated RT 16 51 15 15 CBD? N TOTAL 46 65 1618 1377 31071 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 54 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Len CY = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB LR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 46 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.145 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 Lane grou2 capacity, c = 320 Average lane group delay = 19.5 Lane group LOS = C 19.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A 1.8 INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: rrr------ 95th percentile queue, feet =1 95 nverrnnnrity nvera¢e queue. feet = WB NB SB LR L TR L TR 65 5 1693 36 1409 0.215 0.005 0.661 0.059 0.550 0.213 0.713 0.713 0.713 0.713 304 1009 2562 603 2562 19.8 0.5 1.3 0.5 1.0 C A A A A 19.8 1.3 1.0 C A A 104 76 198 81 162 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:23 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 67 5 228 17 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 1556 1243 Final Year = 2000 RT 93 10 8 97 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 5 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 37 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 67 5 228 17 TH 1 1 1556 1243 Controller = RT 93 10 8 97 CBD33?TOTAL [_�n 161 16 1792 1357 26 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 y 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through y Right y Ped y Westbound Left Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 40 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 68 93 16 228 1642 17 1407 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.182 0.261 0.046 0.752 0.652 0.030 0.734 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.700 0.700 0.538 0.538 Lane group capacity, c = 373 356 355 304 2519 569 1916 Average lane group delay = 19.1 19.5 18.4 19.6 1.6 4.7 8.4 Lane group LOS = C C C C A A B 19.3 18.4 3.9 8.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A B B 6.6 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 104 115 82 113 199 79 243 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 168 67 9 29 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1363 1232 Final Year = 2000 RT 22 261 9 26 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 0 2 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 43 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 168 67 9 29 TH 2 3 1363 1232 Controller = semi actuated RT 22 261 9 26 CBD, N TOTAL 192 332 1381 1286 3192 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 43 15 6 Yellow+All Red = 1 6 5 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 192 70 261 1450 1351 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.691 0.252 0.462 0.810 0.984 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.350 0.575 0.775 Lane group ca aci ,c = 278 279 565 1790 1373 Average lane group delay = 27.0 20.0 15.8 8.1 13.0 Lane group LOS = D C C B B 27.0 16.7 8.1 13.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C B B B 12.1 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 184 106 194 234 134 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 128 59 39 33 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 11 1099 1125 Final Year = 2000 RT 54 158 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 7 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 1 10 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 1 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 128 59 39 33 TH 7 11 1099 1125 Controller = semi actuated RT 54 158 28 84 CBD? N TOTAL 189 227 1167 1241 2824 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y Lane width = 16.0 y 15.0 y 11.0 Y 11.0 Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 6 39 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 Cycle Length: Cv = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 189 227 1225 1303 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.814 0.615 0.939 0.609 Green ratio, g/C = 0.263 0.263 0.525 0.663 Lane gro22 ca aci , c = 232 369 1304 2139 Average lane group delay = 34.3 21.9 17.5 2.6 Lane group LOS = D C C A 34.3 21.9 17.5 2.6 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C C A B 12.4 sedveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 177 193 224 172 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 216 0 115 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 961 1278 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 107 116 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 9 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 0 216 0 115 TH 0 0 961 1278 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 107 116 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 324 1078 1393 27941 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 44 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T R L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 216 107 961 116 115 1278 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.706 0.202 0.926 0.097 0.383 0.955 Green ratio, g/C = 0.175 0.338 0.588 0.800 0.750 0.750 Lane group capacity, c = 307 5291 1038 1201 301 1337 Average lane group delay = 28.5 14.3 14.8 0.0 9.3 9.2 Lane group LOS = D B B A B B 23.8 13.2 9.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B B B 12.4 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 199 114 320 88 91 277 Overcapacity average queue,feet = i RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:02 PM 1/21/99 I Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven I Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: I EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 22 68 2 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 935 1205 Final Year = 2000 f RT 19 30 22 19 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 22 68 2 25 TH 1 1 935 1205 Controller- semi actuated RT 19 30 22 19 CBD? N TOTAL 42 99 960 1249 23501 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 l 1 1 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 I Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 61 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Length: Cy = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB Lane group movements = LTR LTR LTR LTR Adjusted flow rate = 42 99 960 1249 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.230 0.497 0.722 1.063 Green ratio, g/C = 0.125 0.125 0.800 0.800 Lane group capacity, c = 184 199 1328 1175 Average lane group delay = 24.1 26.4 1.0 36.1 Lane group LOS = C D A D Average approach delay= 24.1 26.4 1.0 36.1 Approach LOS = C D A D INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C 21.1 secIveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 96 123 207 - - - �_ . _ 1244 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:05 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 120 56 38 30 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 9 1044 1068 Final Year = 2000 RT 51 149 26 80 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 1 Add dev Y/N = N Movement Volumes: LT 120 56 38 30 TH 7 9 1044 1068 Controller = semi actuated RT 51 149 26 80 CBD? N TOTAL 179 214 1108 1178 26791 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 50 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 179 214 38 1070 30 1068 80 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.704 0.621 0.081 0.936 0.057 0.913 0.080 Green ratio, g/C = 0.263 0.263 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 Lane group capacity, c = 254 345 467 1144 535 1170 994 Average lane group delay = 23.0 19.2 3.1 17.9 3.1 15.3 3.1 Lane group LOS = C C A C A C A 23.0 19.2 17.4 14.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C C B C 16.5 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 148 188 82 301 81 300 90 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 46 33 370 23 Base Year = 1998 TH 15 13 1412 779 Final Year = 2000 RT 203 28 4 24 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 2 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 8 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 46 33 372 23 TH 15 13 1420 780 Controller = semi actuated RT 203 28 4 24 CBD? N TOTAL 264 73 1797 828 2961 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -tam lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 18 12 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 61 203 46 28 372 1495 23 845 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.177 0.589 0.135 0.080 0.784 0.852 0.078 0.496 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.488 0.488 0.175 0.475 Lane group capacity, c = 343 344 339 344 475 1755 299 1703 Average lane group delay = 19.0 23.0 18.8 18.6 19.2 13.1 22.4 9.0 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 22.1 18.7 14.4 9.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 13.8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 101 187 95 87 206 275 86 173 Overcapacity avera e queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1119/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 24 19 42 1 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 8 1812 1080 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 10 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 1 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 24 19 42 1 TH 7 8 1822 1081 Controller = serni actuated RT 0 0 1 0 CBD? N TOTAL 31 28 1865 1082 30061 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 10 8 3 5 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parldng? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Ped Westbound Left I Y Through Y Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Phase Times: Actual Green = 3 30 10 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB WB L T L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 24 7 19 8 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.071 0.022 0.055 0.024 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.213 0.213 Lane group capacity, c = 337 343 345 349 Average lane group delay = 19.1 18.9 19.1 19.0 Lane group LOS = C C C C 19.1 19.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B 9.3 see/veh ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 78 83 79 ianacity average aueue, feet = NB L T 42 1913 0.160 0.907 0.163 0.613 266 2109 21.9 9.1 C B 9.4 95 268 SB L T 1 1135 0.011 0,655 0.063 0.513 100 1731 26.7 8.6 D B 8.6 B 76 216 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1/19199 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 711-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 830 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 127 888 1818 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 678 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 11 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 830 0 0 TH 0 127 899 1819 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 678 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1636 899 1819 4353 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 2 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 34 35 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Len C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 1005 944 2001 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.609 0.537 0.767 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.463 1651 0.463 1 1758 0.463 2610 Average lane group delay = 12.7 9.8 11.9 Lane group LOS = B B B 12.7 9.8 11.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B 11.6 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 213 203 241 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:34 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 225 0 216 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1985 1920 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 398 203 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 28 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 3 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 225 0 216 TH 0 0 2013 1921 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 398 206 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 623 2219 2137 49711 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 37 15 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 225 398 2441 216 2017 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.642 0.633 0.915 0.537 0.760 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.425 0.500 0.713 0.713 Lane group capacity, c = 351 628 2667 403 2654 Average lane group delay = 24.6 15.2 13.9 13.4 1.8 Lane group LOS = C C B B A 18.6 13.9 3.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B 9.8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 199 227 268 110 224 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 304 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 2228 1963 Final Year = 2000 RT 173 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 31 1 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 304 0 0 0 TH 0 0 2259 1964 Controller = semi actuated RT 173 0 0 0 CBD, N TOTAL 477 0 2259 1964 46991 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = l 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 15 54 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 304 173 2372 2062 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.808 0.513 0.924 0.804 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.713 0.713 Lane group capacity, c = 376 336 2566 2566 Average lane group delay = 31.3 22.3 5.1 2.2 Lane group LOS = D C B A 28.0 5.1 2.2 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D B A B 6.2 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 233 176 252 227 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 122 18 198 49 Base Year = 1998 TH 13 12 1864 1568 Final Year = 2000 RT 223 56 26 100 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 3 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 31 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 122 18 201 49 TH 13 12 1895 1570 Controller =F semi actuated RT 223 56 26 100 CBD? N TOTAL 357 85 2122 1719 4284 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 30 8 10 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 135 223 85 201 2018 49 1649 100 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.739 0.417 0.383 0.756 0.936 0.203 0.779 0.107 Green ratio, g/C = 0.150 0.338 0.150 0.150 0.600 0.138 0.588 0.588 Lane group capacity, c = 182 534 222 265 2157 243 2116 930 Average lane group delay = 34.5 15.8 23.9 32.9 11.3 25.4 6.8 3.3 Lane group LOS = D C C D B D B A'. 22.8 23.9 13.3 7.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 11.8 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 139 182 115 195 287 99 251 nw--rcanaciry average oueue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 253 15 95 112 Base Year = 1998 TH 28 6 1676 1485 Final Year = 2000 RT 116 68 6 320 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 2 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 34 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 253 15 97 112 TH 28 6 1710 1487 Controller = semi actuated RT 116 68 6 320 CBD? N TOTAL 397 90 1813 1920 4219 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 29 8 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 79 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 253 28 116 21 68 97 1802 112 1562 320 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.896 0.086 0.215 0.073 0.252 0.432 0.910 0.455 0.771 0.359 Green ratio, g/C = 0.177 0.177 0.342 0.177 0.177 0.127 0.570 0.139 0.582 0.582 Lane group ca aci ,c = 282 319 541 293 271 224 1980 246 2025 891 Average lane group delay = 44.2 20.6 0.0 20.6 21.4 27.2 11.3 26.6 6.9 4.2 Lane group LOS = E C A C C D B D B A 29.6 21.2 12.1 7.6 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C B B B 11.9 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 214 87 117 85 106 121 275 128 241 148 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 30 14 5 36 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1597 1326 Final Year = 2000 RT 16 51 15 15 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 36 2 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 30 14 5 36 TH 0 0 1633 1328 Controller = semi actuated RT 16 51 15 15 CBD? N TOTAL 46 65 1654 1379 31451 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Sorthbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 54 15 Yellow+All Red =1 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len Cv = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 46 65 5 1731 36 1411 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.145 0.215 0.005 0,676 0.059 0.551 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 0.713 0.713 0.713 0.713 Lane group capacity, c = 320 304 1009 2563 603 2562 age lane group delay = 19.5 19.8 0.5 1.4 0.5 1.0 Lane group LOS = C C A A A A 19.5 19.8 1.4 1.0 erage approach delay= L Approach LOS = C C A A A 1.9 sec/veh ION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 95 104 76 201 81 163 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:03 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. intersection: US 7/Mclntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 109 15 92 11 Base Year = 1998 TH 11 5 1782 1513 Final Year = 2000 RT 72 17 11 90 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 0 0 2 40 0 2 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 109 15 94 11 TH 11 5 1822 1515 Controller = semi actuated RT 72 17 11 90 CBD? N TOTAL 192 37 1927 1616 37721 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped v Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 40 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 120 72 37 94 1924 11 1685 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.335 0.201 0.112 0.309 0.764 0.018 0.878 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.225 358 0.225 356 0.225 334 0.700 0.700 1 304 2519 0.538 0.538 631 1920 Average lane group delay = 20.0 19.2 18.7 8.7 2.3 4.6 11.4 Lane group LOS = C C C B A A B 19.7 18.7 2.6 11.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A B B 7.4 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 127 106 91 91 223 78 279 Overcapacity average queue, feet= RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build 12:07 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = PM Base: LT TH RT Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = 1998 2000 1.00 168 2 22 67 3 261 9 1363 9 29 1232 26 Development: LT TH DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1 1.00 1.00 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 RT 0 43 0 0 Add dev Y/N = 168 2 22 71 3 304 9 1363 9 31 1232 26 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT Controller = semi actuated CBD? N TOTAL 32411 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 192 379 1381 1288 LANE GEOMETRY: EB Number of approach Lanes = 1 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y Right turn allowed and shared? y Lane width = 15.0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 WB 2 0 1 y N 12.0 0.0 12.0 NB 2 0 0 y y 11.0 0.0 0.0 SB 2 0 0 Y Y 11.0 0.0 0.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 1 0 4 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 10 10 10 0 4 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 z A c F 1 R nanouvv � - - Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 43 15 6 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 5 Cycle Len SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group We ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = C = 80 sec EB WB NB SB LTR 192 0.701 0.213 274 LT R 74 304 0.268 0.538 0.213 0.350 278 565 LTR 1450 0.810 0.575 1790 LTR 1353 1.019 0.775 1328 average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 27.4 D 20.1 16.6 C C 8.1 B 20.9 C 27.4 D 17.3 C 8.1 B 20.9 C C 15.4 see/veh ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 184 108 210 234 anacity averaee aueue, feet = 257 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlen Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 128 59 39 33 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 11 1099 1125 Final Year = 2000 RT 54 158 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 7 0 0 DHV adjust= 1.00 TH 0 0 1 10 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 1 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 128 66 39 33 TH 7 11 1100 1135 Controller = semi actuated RT 54 158 28 85 CBD? N TOTAL 189 234 1168 1252 28431 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 21 6 39 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 82 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 189 234 1226 1315 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.755 0.604 0.969 0.630 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.280 250 0.280 388 0.512 1266 0.646 2087 Average lane group delay = 28.7 21.3 22.3 3.3 Lane group LOS = D C C A 28.7 21.3 22.3 3.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C C A B 14.3 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queuefeet = 177 196 233 195 Overcapacity average queue'feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 216 0 115 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 961 1278 Final Year = 2000 RT 0 107 116 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 I DHV adjust= 1.00 TH 0 0 0 9 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 216 0 116 TH 0 0 961 1287 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 107 116 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 324 1078 1403 28041 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 44 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T R L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 216 107 961 116 116 1287 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.706 0.202 0.926 0.097 0.387 0.962 Green ratio, g/C = 0.175 0.338 0.588 0.800 0.750 0.750 Lane group capacity, c = 307 529 1038 1201 301 1337 Average lane group delay = 28.5 14.3 14.8 0.0 9.3 10.0 Lane group LOS = D B B A B B 23.8 13.2 9.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B B B 12.8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 199 114 320 88 91 279 Overcapacity average ueue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:03 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 22 68 2 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 935 1205 Final Year = 2000 RT 19 30 22 19 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 22 68 2 26 TH 1 1 935 1213 Controller = semi actuated RT 19 30 22 19 CBD? N TOTAL 42 99 960 1258 23591 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 1 1 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y Lane width = 15.0 y 15.0 y 12.0 y 12.0 Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN- Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 61 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 42 99 960 1258 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.230 0.497 0.722 1.076 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.125 184 0.125 199 0.800 1328 0.800 1 169 Average lane group delay = 24.1 26.4 1.0 41.4 Lane group LOS = C D A E 24.1 26.4 1.0 41.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C D A E C 24 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 96 123 207 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = 1477 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:07 PM 1119/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2000 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 120 56 38 30 Base Year = 1998 TH 7 9 1044 1068 Final Year = 2000 RT 51 149 26 80 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 0 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 1 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 120 56 38 30 TH 7 9 1044 1076 Controller = semi actuated RT 51 149 26 81 CBD? NI TOTAL 179 214 1108 1187 26881 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 l 2 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival - 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN• Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Rightl Y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 50 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 cle Length: Cy = 80 sec s'VEL-OF-SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = LTR Adjusted flow rate = 179 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.704 Green ratio, g/C = 0.263 Lane group capacity, c = 254 Average lane group delay = 23.0 Lane group LOS = C 23.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = UEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 148 WB NB SB LTR L TR L T R 214 38 1070 30 1076 81 0.621 0.081 0.936 0.057 0.920 0.081 0.263 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 0.663 345 465 1144 535 1170 994 19.2 3.1 17.9 3.1 15.9 3.1 C A C A C A 19.2 17.4 14.7 C C B 188 82 301 81 302 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 34 22 236 20 Base Year = 1998 TH 12 9 1126 600 Final Year = 2005 RT 147 26 8 18 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 l 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 6 101 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 25 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Ln Movement Volumes: LT 34 22 236 20 TH 12 9 1126 600 Controller = semi actuated RT 147 26 8 18 CBD? N TOTAL 193 57 1370 638 2258 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 6 7 3 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 46 20 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 10 11 17 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 46 79 31 21 236 1191 20 649 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.109 0.198 0.075 0.052 0.696 0.780 0.069 0.461 Green ratio, g/C = 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.271 0.200 0.429 0.171 0.400 Lane group capacity, c = 423 400 415 396 339 1527 288 1407 Average lane group delay = 14.6 15.0 14.4 14.3 24.0 12.7 19.8 10.6 Lane group LOS = B B B B C B C B 14.9 14.4 14.6 10.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B B 13.5 sedveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 91 103 86 82 192 228 83 145 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB S Base: LT 24 34 45 TH 9 9 1343 8 RT 0 0 0 Development: LT 0 6 0 TH 0 0 7 1 RT 8 0 1 Movement Volumes: LT 24 34 45 TH 9 9 1343 8 RT 0 0 0 TOTAL 33 43 1388 8 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB S Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 1 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N N N Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Lane width - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 -> 1 Eastbound © 1996 RSG, Inc.I VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: O1 30 O1 06 0.0 B Time of Day = AM 5 Base Year = 1998 Final Year = 2005 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Total Growth = 1.00 0 Add dev Y/N - n 5 Controller = semi actuated 0 CBD? N 2270 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 B TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 1 Heavy vehicles, %= 9 8 3 6 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 .0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 Y Y Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 19 10 11 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, C = EB WB NB SB L T 24 9 0.081 0.030 0.186 0.186 295 302 L T 34 9 0.115 0.029 0.186 0.186 297 305 L T 45 1410 0.148 0.755 0.186 0.543 304 1869 L 5 0.022 0.143 227 T 841 0.503 0.500 1673 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 17.9 C 17.7 C 18.0 C 17.7 C 18.1 C 7.5 B 19.6 C 7.0 B 17.8 C 17.9 C 7.8 B 7.1 B B 7.9 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 85 79 88 79 93 219 77 152 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 108 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1419 1418 Final Year = 2005 RT 121 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 22 344 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 29 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 108 0 0 0 TH 0 0 1419 1418 Controller = semi actuated RT 121 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 229 0 1419 1418 30651 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 44 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 108 121 1490 1488 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.251 0.315 0.616 0.616 Green ratio, g/C = 0.243 0.243 0.671 0.671 Lane group capacity—, c =1 430 385 2418 2418 Average lane group delay = 16.3 16.7 2.1 2.1 Lane group LOS = C C A A 16.5 2.1 2.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A A 3.2 secIveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 115 120 169 169 Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont V lyy0 K3l7, mu. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 12 10 74 16 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1175 1461 Final Year = 2005 RT 131 27 10 36 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 3 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 23 373 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 33 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 12 10 74 16 TH 2 3 1175 1461 Controller = semi actuated RT 131 27 10 36 CBD? N TOTAL 145 40 1259 1513 2956 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 22 8 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 14 131 40 74 1244 16 1534 36 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.061 0.231 0.173 0.244 0.605 0.057 0.764 0.041 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.357 0.143 0.171 0.571 0.157 0.557 0.557 Lane group ca aci , c = 229 565 231 303 2055 278 2006 882 Average lane group delay = 19.7 12.0 20.1 20.5 5.1 20.6 7.0 3.6 Lane group LOS = C B C C B C B A 12.7 20.1 6.0 7.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B C B B B 7.1 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 81 116 92 105 192 82 228 83 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-aurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 128 39 21 55 Base Year = 1998 TH 5 2 1320 1542 Final Year = 2005 RT 39 112 30 103 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 10 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 25 409 Total Growth = I.00 RT 10 0 1 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 128 39 21 55 TH 5 2 1320 1542 Controller = semi actuated RT 39 112 30 103 CBD? N TOTAL 172 153 1371 1700 33961 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 20 8 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 128 5 39 41 112 21 1417 55 1619 103 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.428 0.015 0.063 0.120 0.365 0.085 0,795 0.197 0.881 0.128 Green ratio, g/C = 0.200 0.200 0.386 0.200 0.200 0.143 0.514 0.157 0.529 0.529 Lane group capacity, c = 299 360 611 340 306 253 1783 278 1838 809 Average lane group delay = 19.2 17.1 0.0 17.5 18.7 21.5 9.3 21.1 10.9 4.6 Lane group LOS = C C A C C C B C B A 14.8 18.4 9.5 10.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B C B B B 10.8 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 125 77 87 91 118 84 230 97 248 99 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Devel [Move opment: EB WB NB S 4 19 15 10 LT TH 0 6 1201 132 RT 7 100 40 2 0 6 0 LT TH 0 0 26 43 RT 2 0 1 4 19 15 10 ment Volumes: LT TH 0 6 1201 132 RT 7 100 40 2 11 125 1255 144 TOTAL GEOMETRY: EB WB NB S Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y n Right tarn allowed and shared? y y y Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11. Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped © 1996 RSG, VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: B Time of Day = AM I Base Year = 1998 5 Final Year = 2005 3 Growth/yr = 1.00 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 0 Total Growth = 1.00 0 Add dev Y/N = Ln 1 5 Controller = semi actuated 3 CBD? N 9 28401 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 B TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 1 Heavy vehicles, %= 2 2 2 2 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red =1 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = EB WB NB SB LR 11 0.044 0.171 256 LTR 125 0.500 0.171 250 L TR 15 1303 0.017 0.489 0.743 0.743 884 2663 L 101 0.294 0.743 343 TR 1415 0.530 0.743 2669 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= AP proach LOS = 18.4 C 21.3 C 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.2 A 18.4 C 21.3 C 0.2 A 0.2 A INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = A 1.2 see/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 80 125 77 131 88 138 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:05 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont OO 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 70 11 40 7 Base Year = 1998 TH 3 2 1213 1403 Final Year = 2005 RT 68 5 2 54 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 4 0 1 30 0 476 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 23 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 70 11 40 7 TH 3 2 1213 1403 Controller = semi actuated RT 68 5 2 54 CBD2 N TOTAL 141 18 1255 1464 28791 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 l 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y Right turn allowed and shared? n Lane width = 12.0 y y 15.0 n y 11.0 n Y 11.0 Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 0 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = N 10 N N 10 10 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 30 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 73 68 18 40 1276 7 1530 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.173 0.166 0.046 0.085 0.539 0.012 0.906 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 0.257 425 0.257 407 0.257 401 0.657 0.657 472 2366 0.471 0.471 586 1689 Average lane group delay = 15.4 15.4 14.9 7.4 2.2 6.0 14.7 Lane group LOS = C C B B A B B 15.4 14.9 2.4 14.7 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B B 9A sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 102 99 82 82 156 77 259 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build 1:17 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = AM 1998 2005 1.00 1.00 1.00 Base: Development: LT TH RT LT TH 31 1 6 0 2 8 4 27 4 5 5 1078 35 0 0 246 1037 52 503 0 Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth — n RT 0 31 29 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 31 8 5 246 TH RT TOTAL 1 6 38 4 27 39 1078 35 1119 1037 52 1335 Controller= CBD? 2531 Lost Time Per Phase = semt actuated N 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 1 A S A 7 8 !"rrt1JI1VV rL.tll v. � - - Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 32 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 c:ycie L.en LEVEL -OF -SERVICE. - Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = _ Lane group capacity, c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = oxi—nnnnity average aueue. feet = — 70 sec EB WB NB SB LTR LT R LTR LTR 38 12 27 1174 1402 0.087 0.027 0.064 0.734 0.894 0.257 0.257 0.257 0.500 0.657 438 454 415 1600 1568 15.0 14.8 14.9 9.0 7.1 B B B B B 15.0 14.9 9.0 7.1 B B B B B 8.2 sec/veh 89 79 85 205 167 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:17 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 48 7 28 125 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 971 827 Final Year = 2005 RT 15 27 70 69 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 3 6 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 66 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 43 l Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 48 7 28 125 TH 2 2 971 827 Controller = semi actuated RT 15 27 70 69 CBD? N TOTAL 65 36 1069 1021 21901 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 l 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width — 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 I0 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 65 36 1122 1072 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.242 0.132 0.703 0.519 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.586 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 268 270 1596 2064 Average lane group delay = 19.2 18.7 5.5 0.3 Lane group LOS = C C B A 19.2 18.7 5.5 0.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B A A 3.7 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 101 89 163 117 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build 1:17 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 59 0 85 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1274 781 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 150 149 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 59 7 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 7 0 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 0 59 0 0 1274 85 781 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 0 150 149 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 209 1423 865 24971 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SBI Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 1 A S 6 7 8 - Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Ped Souhbound Left Y y Through Y y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 40 8 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 Cycle Lengm: ;VEL-OF-SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C Lane group capacity, c Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = UEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = nvrrrannriry average nueue. feet = — 70 sec EB WB NB SB L R T R L T 59 150 1274 149 85 781 0.294 0.836 1.175 0.161 0.135 0.547 0.114 0.114 0.614 0.614 0.800 0.800 200 179 1085 922 628 1427 21.8 41.7 96.9 2.4 15.5 0.3 C E F A C A 36.1 87.0 1.8 D F A E 53.2 sec/veh 100 139 103 83 176 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:05 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 26 14 36 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 646 774 Final Year = 2005 RT 2 26 36 25 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 2 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 55 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 26 14 36 25 TH 0 1 646 774 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 26 36 25 CBD? N TOTAL 28 41 717 823 1610 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = I I I 1 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 t0 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 28 41 717 823 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.106 0.150 0.774 0.761 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.743 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 268 275 927 1082 Average lane group delay = 18.6 18.8 2.4 1.9 Lane group LOS = C C A A 18.6 18.8 2.4 1.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 2.8 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 92 190 203 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Base: Development: Movement Volumes: 1:17 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. C & VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM LT 87 3 6 21 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 651 538 Final Year = 2005 RT 14 8 7 56 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 6 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 44 6 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 1 Add dev YIN = n LT 87 3 6 21 TH 0 0 651 538 Controller = semi actuated RT 14 8 7 56 CBD? N TOTAL 101 11 663 614 13901 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 ROAD COND EB WB NB SBI LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFI 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 l 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 3 3 7 A < r i .Q rn.vsuvv �c.niv. - - Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 15 43 Yellow+All Red =1 6 6 c:ycie t.engm: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE. - Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = Average lane group delay Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = nvrrcnnnciry average queue. feet = - 70 sec EB WB NB SB LR LR L TR L T 101 11 6 658 21 538 0.238 0.031 0.006 0.578 0,030 0.463 0.0 0.257 0.257 0,657 0.657 0.657 0.657 0.6 425 366 894 1137 696 1161 9 13.3 12.6 2.7 4.8 2.7 4.0 B B A A A A 13.3 12.6 4.8 3.8 R B A A 112 79 76 210 78 190 84 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 34 22 236 20 Base Year = 1998 TH 12 9 1126 600 Final Year = 2005 RT 147 26 8 18 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 6 101 Total Growth = 100 RT 25 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Ln Movement Volumes: LT 34 26 237 20 TH 12 9 1132 701 Controller = semi actuated RT 172 26 8 18 CBD? N TOTAL 218 61 1377 739 23951 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 6 7 3 4 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 46 20 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 10 11 17 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 46 93 35 21 237 1198 20 755 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.110 0.232 0.085 0.052 0.699 0.784 0.069 0.536 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 0.271 419 0.271 400 0.271 410 0.271 3961 0.200 0.429 339 1527 0.171 0.400 288 1408 Average lane group delay = 14.6 15.1 14.5 14.3 24.1 12.8 19.8 11.1 Lane group LOS = B C B B C B C B 14.9 14.4 14.7 11.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B B 13.6 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =F 91 108 87 82 192 229 83 160 Overcapacity averse queue, feet= RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 24 34 45 5 Base Year = 1998 TH 9 9 1343 801 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 6 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 7 130 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 8 0 1 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 24 9 40 9 45 1350 5 931 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 8 0 1 0 CBD? N TOTAL 41 49 1396 936 24221 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = i 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 9 8 3 6 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 10Loo 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.000 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Ped Southbound Left r Y Through Y Y Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 19 10 11 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len the C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane rou ca aci ,c = EB WB NB SB L T 24 9 0.081 0.030 0.186 0.186 295 302 L T 40 9 0.135 0.029 0.186 0.186 296 305 L T 45 1418 0.148 0.758 0.186 0.543 304 1869 L 5 0.022 0.143 227 T 977 0.584 0.500 1673 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = 17.9 C 17.7 C 18.1 C 17.7 C 18.1 C 7.5 B 19.6 C 7.5 B 17.8 C 18.0 C 7.8 B 7.6 B B 8.1 see/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 85 79 91 79 93 220 77 169 nvrrcnnacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 760 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 19 523 668 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 567 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 163 0 0 8 0 143 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 923 0 0 TH 0 19 531 811 Controller = semi actuated RTI 0 567 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1509 531 811 28511 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 3 0 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 29 30 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT T TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 989 557 893 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.615 0.321 0.353 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 0.457 1608 0.457 1737 0.457 2530 Average lane group delay = 11.4 7.6 7.8 Lane group LOS = B B B 11.4 7.6 7.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B B 9.2 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 193 124 112 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity averse ueue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 198 0 205 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1434 1590 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 293 158 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 38 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 20 306 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 0 2 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 236 0 205 TH 0 0 1454 1896 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 293 160 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 529 1613 2101 4244 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 2 1 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 32 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len CY = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 236 287 1773 205 1991 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.716 0.468 0.665 0.501 0.748 Green ratio, g/C = 0.200 0.414 0.500 0.714 0.714 Lane group capacity, c = 330 612 2665 410 2661 Average lane group delay = 24.8 11.8 8.0 7.0 1.5 Lane group LOS = C B B B A 17.7 8.0 2.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B 6.2 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 192 182 185 104 201 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 108 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1419 1418 Final Year = 2005 RT 121 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 22 344 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 29 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 108 0 0 0 TH 0 0 1441 1762 Controller = semi actuated RT 150 0 0 0 CBD2 N TOTAL 258 0 1441 1762 3460 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 t0 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 44 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Len C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 108 150 1513 1850 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.251 0.390 0.626 0.765 Green ratio, g/C = 0.243 0.243 0.671 0.671 Lane group capacity, c = 430 385 1 2418 2418 Average lane group delay = 16.3 17.2 2.1 3.0 Lane group LOS = C C A A 16.8 2.1 3.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A A 3.7 se lveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 115 130 171 210 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 12 10 74 16 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1175 1461 Final Year = 2005 RT 131 27 10 36 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 3 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 23 373 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 33 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N - Movement Volumes: LT 12 13 75 16 TH 2 3 1198 1834 Controller = semi actuated RT 164 27 10 36 CBD? N TOTAL 178 43 1283 1886 33891 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-mm lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left I y Through y y Right y y Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 22 8 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT R 14 164 0.062 0.290 0.143 0.357 228 565 LTR 43 0.185 0.143 232 L TR 75 1269 0.247 0.617 0.171 0.571 303 2055 L T 16 1925 0.057 0.960 0.157 0.557 278 2006 R 36 0.041 0.557 882 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 19.7 C 12.3 B 20.1 C 20.5 C 5.1 B 20.6 C 14.7 B 3.6 A 12.9 B 20.1 C 6.0 B 14.5 B B 11.3 secIveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 81 126 93 105 195 82 270 83 ()-rcannciry average queue. feet = ___ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 128 39 21 55 Base Year = 1998 TH 5 2 1320 1542 Final Year = 2005 RT 39 112 30 103 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 10 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 25 409 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 10 0 1 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 128 49 21 55 TH 5 2 1345 1951 Controller = semi actuated RT 49 112 31 103 CBD? N TOTAL 182 163 1397 2109 38511 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = .2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and.shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 24 8 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Len C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 128 5 49 51 112 21 1445 55 2049 103 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.617 0.021 0.094 0.212 0.511 0.085 0.729 0.197 1.006 0.115 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0.329 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.571 0.157 0.586 0.586 Lane group capacity, C = 207 257 520 240 219 253 1981 278 2037 896 Average lane group delay = 25.2 19.6 0.0 20.2 22.7 21.5 6.1 21.1 21.3 3.0 Lane group LOS = D C A C C C B C C A' 18.3 21.9 6.3 20.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B C C 15.2 secIveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 128 77 91 96 122 84 213 97 96', Overcapacity averse queue, fee = 296 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build i 1:18 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 4 19 15 101 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 6 1201 1325 Final Year = 2005 RT 7 100 40 23 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 6 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 26 430 Total Growth = 1 1.00 RT 2 0 1 0 Add dev YIN = v Movement Volumes: LT 4 25 15 101 TH 0 6 1227 1755 Controller= semi actuated) RT 9 100 41 23 CBD,, N' TOTAL 13 131 1282 1879 33051 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped I Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB I I I LR 13 0.052 0.171 257 LTR 131 0.523 0.171 250 L TR 15 1331 0.017 0.500 0.743 0.743 884 2663 L 101 0.294 0,743 343 TR 1867 0.699 0.743 2670 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 18.4 C 21.7 C 0.1 0.2 A A 0.2 A 0.6 A 18.4 C 21.7 C 0.2 A 0.6 A A 1.4 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 80 128 77 133 88 167 I O1 P.rranacity average aueue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:44 PM 1121J99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 70 11 40 7 Base Year = 1998 TH 3 2 1213 1403 Final Year = 2005 RT 68 5 2 54 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 30 476 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 23 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT TH 70 3 15 2 41 1243 7 1879 Controller = semi actuated RT 91 5 2 54 CBD? N TOTAL 164 22 1286 1940 3413 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -rum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width — 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 ]a Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped v Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len Cy = 70 sec F-SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT R 73 91 0.268 0.334 0.171 0.171 274 271 LTR 22 0.088 0.171 254 L TR 41 1308 0.077 0.489 0.743 0.743 536 2675 L 7 0,009 0.586 758 TR 2030 0.966 0.586 2101 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 19.3 C 19.7 C 18.5 C 9.3 B 0.2 A 2A A B 14 B 19.5 C 18.5 C 0.5 A 14.1 B B 9.3 seelveh :SECTION LOS & DELAY = G ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 105 111 84 80 132 76 267 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 11:10 AM 2/16/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 31 8 5 246 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 4 1078 1037 Final Year = 2005 RT 6 27 35 52 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 0 503 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 2 5 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 31 29 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 31 12 5 749 TH 3 9 1078 1037 Controller = semi actuated RT 6 58 0 52 CBD? N TOTAL 40 79 1084 1838 30411 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 13 10 21 4 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R L T L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 40 21 58 5 1132 749 1144 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.292 0.142 0.063 0.015 0.904 0.974 0.552 Green ratio, g/C = 0.086 0.086 0.571 0.214 0.343 0.443 0.571 Lane group capacity, c = 138 150 923 347 1253 769 2074 Average lane group delay = 23.2 22.5 5.1 17.2 21.1 28.7 4.7 Lane group LOS = C C B C C D A 23.2 9.8 21.1 14.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B C B C 16.8 sedveh NTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 93 84 87 77 243 303 169 0vercannciry average oueue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1 / 19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 48 7 28 125 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 971 827 Final Year = 2005 RT 15 27 70 69 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 3 TH 0 6 0 0 66 1 8 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 2 43 1 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 51 13 28 126 TH 2 2 1037 835 Controller = semi actuated RT 15 29 113 70 CBD7 N TOTAL 68 44 1178 1031 23201 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y Right turn allowed and shared? y Lane width = 16.0 y y 15.0 y y 11.0 Y Y 11.0 Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 0 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 38 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 68 44 1236 1082 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.261 0.165 0.773 0.588 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 0.171 260 0.171 266 0.586 1 1600 0.743 1841 Average lane group delay = 19.2 18.8 6.4 0.4 Lane group LOS = C C B A 19.2 18.8 6.4 0.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B A A 4.3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 102 93 175 118 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 59 0 85 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1274 781 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 150 149 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 59 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 7 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT TH 0 0 59 0 0 1333 86 788 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 157 149 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 216 1482 873 2571 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lanewidth = :L 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Westbound Left y Through Right Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y y Through Y y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 40 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 C'vrlr T moth- Cv = 70 see -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate =I Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = ECTION LOS & DELAY = L 59 0.294 0.114 200 21.8 C 40.3 E NB SB R T R L T 157 1333 149 86 788 0.875 1.229 0.161 0.137 0.552 0.114 0.614 0.614 0.800 0.800 179 1085 922 624 1427 47.2 132.5 2.4 15.5 0.3 E F A C A 119.5 1.8 F A ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 100 142 103 83 177 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 12:44 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 26 14 36 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 646 774 Final Year = 2005 RT 2 26 36 25 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 2 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 55 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 28 14 36 25 TH 0 1 701 781 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 28 36 25 CBD? N TOTAL 30 43 772 830 1676 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 I 1 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 49 10 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 30 43 772 830 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.114 0.158 0.821 0.785 Green ratio, g/C = 0.171 0.171 0.743 0.743 Lane group capacity, c = 266 274 941 1057 Average lane group delay = 18.6 18.8 3.4 2.3 Lane group LOS = C C A A 18.6 18.8 3.4 2.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A A A 3.5 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 87 92 197 204 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:18 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 87 3 6 21 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 651 539 Final Year = 2005 RT 14 8 7 56 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 6 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 44 6 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 1 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 3 6 695 21 544 Controller = semi actuated TH00 L:93 RT4 9 7 57 CBD? N TOTAL 107 12 707 621 14481 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width 0.0 1 I.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =,I.. 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 15 43 Yellow+All Red = 6 6 Cycle Length: Cy = 70 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB L T R Lane group movements = LR LR L TR 6 702 21 544 57 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = 107 0.253 12 0.034 0.006 0.617 0.030 0.469 0.057 Green ratio, g/C = 0.257 0.257 0,657 0,657 0.657 0.657 0.657 Lane groupca aci , c = 424 366 893 1137 682 1161 986 Average lane group delay = 13.4 12.6 2.7 5.2 2.7 4.1 2.8 Lane group LOS = B B A B A A A 13.4 12.6 5.2 3.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = B B B `°` B 5.3 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 114 79 76 217 78 191 84 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity averse queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1: 12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Q 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Bane: LT 48 35 389 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 16 13 1484 819 Final Year = 2005 RT 213 29 4 26 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 19 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 73 5 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 48 35 389 25 TH 16 13 1484 819 Controller = semi actuated RT 213 29 4 26 CBD? N TOTAL 277 77 1878 869 3100 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 18 12 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LT R L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 64 213 48 29 389 1563 25 887 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.187 0.619 0.143 0.084 0.820 0.890 0.082 0.521 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.488 0.488 0.175 0.475 Lane group ca aci , c = 340 344 336 344 475 1755 299 1703 Average lane group delay = 19.1 23.6 18.9 18.6 20.8 14.5 22.4 9.1 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 22.6 18.8 15.8 9.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C C B B 14.7 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 102 192 96 87 211 285 86 192 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vernwnt Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Base: Development: Movement Volumes: 1:12 PM 1/19/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. O VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: LT TH RT LT TH EB WB NB SB Time of Day = Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth = PM 1998 2005 1.00 1.00 1.00 26 20 45 1 8 9 1904 1135 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 92 7 RT 0 0 5 0 Add dev Y/N = n 26 8 0 20 9 0 45 1904 0 1 1135 0 LT TH RT 3148 Controller =[71 CBD?TOTAL Lost Time Per Phase 34 29 1949 1136 D COND EB WB NB SB GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & R A Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 5 2 2 3 3 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 10 8 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0 10LO: 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 z A S (, 7 8 rlYfi Jttvv rt...Y,v. - - - Y Eastbound Left Through Y Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 3 30 10 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 Cycle Length: -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = C = 80 sec EB WB NB SB L T 26 8 0.077 0.023 0.213 0.213 336 343 L T 20 9 0.058 0.026 0.213 0.213 344 349 L T 45 2000 0.168 0.948 0.163 0.613 266 2109 L 1 0,011 0.063 100 T 1191 0.688 0.513 1731 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = ECTION LOS & DELAY = 19.2 C 18.9 C 19.1 C 19.0 C 21.9 C 11.8 B 26D B 9 B 19.1 C 19.1 C 12.0 B 9.0 B B 11.1 sec/veh ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 78 84 79 96 278 76 224 -snacity averaee aueue, feet = __ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 711-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 873 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 133 933 1911 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 713 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 3 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 100 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 873 0 0 TH 0 133 933 1911 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 713 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 1719 933 1911 45631 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 2 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PUT = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 34 35 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 Cycle Length: Cy = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT 1056 0.640 0.463 1651 T 980 0.557 0.463 1758 TR 2102 0.805 0.463 2610 Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 13.1 B 9.9 B 12.5 B 13.1 B 9.9 B 12.5 B B 12 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 220 209 251 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19l99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM LT 0 237 0 227 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 0 0 2086 2018 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 418 213 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 1 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 249 11 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 25 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 237 0 0 2086 227 2018 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 0 0 418 213 0 CBD? I N TOTAL 0 655 2300 2245 52001 Lost Time Per Phase = L 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 0 2 No. of exclusive left-mm lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left tum allowed and shared? N N N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y n Buses, Nb = 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1,00 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 12.0 PHF = 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 N Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N 1 G Pedstrian buttontime, sec = 10 10 10 Right tums on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival ty2E.=1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 37 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 cle Len C = 80 sec WB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS Average approach delay Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = n.. nnaoity average queue. feet = L R 237 418 0.675 0,666 0.213 0.425 351 628 25.5 15.9 D C 19.4 C 204 234 NB TR 2530 0.949 0.500 2667 16.0 C 16.0 276 SB L T 227 2119 0.564 0.798 0.713 0.713 403 2654 14.7 2.1 B A 3.4 A 111 232 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 319 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 2342 2063 Final Year = 2005 RT 182 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 275 12 Total Growth — 100 RT 1 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Ln Movement Volumes: LT TH 319 0 0 0 0 2342 0 2063 Controller = semi actuated RT 182 0 0 0 CBD? I N TOTAL 501 0 2342 2063 49051 Lost Time Per Phase = L 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width — 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 18 51 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Len CY = -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L 319 0.721 0.250 442 R 182 0.459 0.250 396 T 2459 1.011 0.675 2431 T 2166 0.891 0.675 2431 Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane EroU La aci , c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 24.8 C 19.9 C 18.2 C 5.4 B 23.0 C 18.2 C 5.4 B B 13.3 sectveh ;ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 233 176 258 nnnacity averaee queue. feet = 435 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- ACM Third Edition 1994 1: 12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Brewer Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 129 19 208 52 Base Year = 1998 TH 13 12 1960 1648 Final Year = 2005 RT 234 59 28 105 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 29 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 275 13 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 2 0 4 0 Add dev YIN = tn Movement Volumes: LT 129 19 208 52 TH 13 12 1960 1648 Controller = semi actuated RT 234 59 28 105 CBD? N TOTAL 376 89 2195 1805 44661 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width — 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = . ]2.�O 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 30 8 10 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: Cv = -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT R 142 234 0,803 0.438 0.150 0.338 177 534 LTR 89 0.405 0.150 221 L TR 208 2087 0.782 0.968 0.150 0.600 265 2156 L T 52 1731 0.213 0.818 0.138 0.588 243 2116 R 105 0.113 0.588 930 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = IECTION LOS & DELAY = 40.2 E 16.0 C 24.1 C 34.3 D 14.4 B 25.4 D 7.4 B 3.3 A 25.1 D 24.1 C 16.3 C 7.7 B B 13.7 see/veh ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 142 186 117 198 294 100 261 99 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 266 16 100 118 Base Year = 1998 TH 29 6 1762 1561 Final Year = 2005 RT 122 72 6 337 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 17 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 308 15 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 1 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 266 16 100 118 TH 29 6 1762 1561 Controller = semi actuated RT 122 72 6 337 CBD? N TOTAL 417 94 1868 2016 43951 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 1 1 0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 29 8 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 79 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L T R LT R L TR L T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 266 29 122 23 72 100 1856 118 1639 337 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.946 0.091 0.226 0.077 0.265 0.445 0.938 0.479 0.810 0,378 Green ratio, g/C = 0.177 0.177 0.342 0.177 0.177 0.127 0.570 0.139 0.582 0.582 Lane group capacity, c = 281 319 541 291 271 224 1980 246 2025 891 Average lane group delay = 52.9 20.7 0.0 20.6 21.5 27.3 13.1 26.8 7.5 4.2 Lane group LOS = E C A C C D B D B A' 35.2 21.3 13.9 8.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D C B B B 13.4 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 220 88 119 85 107 123 282 131 250 177! Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont OO 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/htchrtvsh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 31 15 5 38 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1679 1394 Final Year = 2005 RT 17 54 16 16 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 326 16 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 3 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 31 0 15 0 5 1679 38 1394 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 17 54 16 16 CBD? N TOTAL 48 69 1700 1447 32651 Lost Time Per Phase = L 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N 10 N 10 Pedstnan button time, sec = 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival t = 3 3 4 4 PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 54 15 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane rou ca aci , c = EB WB NB SB LR 48 0.151 0.213 318 LR 69 0.226 0.213 304 L TR 5 1780 0.005 0.695 0.713 0.713 1003 2562 L 38 0.064 0.713 588 TR 1480 0.578 0.713 2562 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = 19.5 C 19.9 C 0.5 A 1.4 A 0.5 A 1.0 A 19.5 C 19.9 C 1.4 A 1.0 A A 1.9 see/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 96 105 76 205 81 168 nvercanacity averaee queue, feet = __ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:04 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont 01996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 71McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 115 16 97 12 Base Year = 1998 TH 12 5 1873 1590 Final Year = 2005 RT 75 18 12 94 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 19 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 360 17 Total Growth - 1.00 RT 1 0 2 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 115 16 97 12 TH 12 5 1873 1590 Controller = semi actuated RT 75 18 12 94 CBD? N TOTAL 202 39 1981 1696 3918 Lost Time Per Phase = 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 .Exclusive Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 l0 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 40 16 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB LT R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 127 75 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.354 0.212 Green ratio, g/C = 0.225 0.225 Lane group capacity, c = 357 356 Average lane group delay = 20.1 19.2 Lane group LOS = C C 19.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B 8.5 sec/vel ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 130 107 WB NB a" LTR L TR L TR 39 97 1978 12 1769 0.119 0.318 0.785 0.019 0.921 0.225 0.700 0.700 0.538 0.538 331 304 2519 624 1920 18.8 10.0 2.5 4.6 13.6 C B A A B 18.8 2.9 13.5 C A B 92 91 227 78 290 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction. Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 177 71 10 30 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1432 1295 Final Year = 2005 RT 24 274 10 27 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 39 0 18 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 1 4 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 380 2 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 177 2 71 3 10 1432 30 1295 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 24 274 10 27 CBD? N TOTAL 203 348 1452 1352 33551 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 4 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left mrn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 40 18 6 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 5 Cycle Length: Cy = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = LTR Adjusted flow rate = 203 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.627 Green ratio, g/C = 0.250 Lane group capacity, c = 323 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 1ECTION LOS & DELAY = 23.0 C 23.0 C B 9 sec/vet ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 184 rnnacity average queue, feet = WB NB SB LT R LTR LTR 74 274 1524 1420 0,239 0.439 0.916 0.343 0.250 0.388 0.538 0.738 309 626 1665 4138 18.3 14.1 13.8 0.2 C B B A 15.0 13.8 0.2 B B A 106 193 258 154 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 134 62 41 34 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 11 1155 1182 Final Year = 2005 RT 56 166 30 88 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 1 59 0 3 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 5 89 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 3 7 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 134 62 41 34 TH 8 11 1155 1182 Controller = semi actuated RT 56 166 30 88 CBD? N TOTAL 198 239 1226 1305 29671 Lost Time Per Phase = L -3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 20 6 38 Yellow+Ail Red = 5 5 6 cle Length: CY = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = LTR Adjusted flow rate = 198 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.838 Green ratio, g/C = 0.275 Lane rou ca aci c = 236 Average lane group delay = 36.1 Lane group LOS = D Average approach delay= 36.1 Approach LOS = D INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 180 WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR 239 1287 1370 0.622 1.033 0.672 0.275 0.513 0.650 383 1246 2037 21.5 36.7 3.4 C D A 21.5 36.7 3.4 C D A 196 196 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 227 0 121 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1010 1343 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 113 122 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 4 82 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 0 227 0 0 1010 121 1343 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 0 113 122 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 340 1133 1464 29371 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type— 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 44 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB T Lane group movements = L R 227 113 1010 T R L 122 121 1343 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.742 0.213 0,974 0.102 0.403 1.004 Green ratio, g/C = 0.175 0.338 0.588 0.800 0.750 0.750 Lane roup capacity, c = 307 529 1038 1201 301 1337 Average lane group delay = 30.1 14.4 20.9 0.0 11.2 17.3 Lane group LOS = D B C A B C 24.9 18.6 16.8 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = �18.4 C C C C sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 204 116 332 89 92 95th percentile queue, feet = _ 268 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:04 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-ocust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 24 71 2 27 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 983 1266 Final Year = 2005 RT 20 32 23 20 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 4 75 Total Growth — 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 24 71 2 27 TH 1 1 983 1266 Controller = semi actuated RT 20 32 23 20 CBD? N TOTAL 45 104 1008 1313 2471 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 1 1 Grade, %= No, of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, see = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 61 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 45 104 1008 1313 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.249 0.528 0.759 1.120 Green ratio, g/C = 0.125 0.125 0.800 0.800 Lane group capacity, c = 181 197 1328 1172 Average lane group delay = 24.2 27.0 1.4 61.0 Lane group LOS = C D A F 24.2 27.0 1.4 61.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C D A F D 34.6 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 97 126 212 Overcapacityaverage queue, feet = 2270 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:12 PM 1/19/99 Resource Svstems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM LT 127 59 40 32 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 8 10 1097 1122 Final Year = 2005 RT 54 157 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 2 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 3 68 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 5 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 127 59 40 1097 32 1122 Controller = semi actuated TH 8 RT 54 10 157 28 84 CBD? N TOTAL 189 225 1164 1238 28171Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 6 0 4 Number of approach Lanes = 1 l 2 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 18 51 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Len C = 80 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB I" NB L T R Lane group movements = LTR LTR L TR 40 1125 32 1122 84 Adjusted flow rate = 189 0.833 225 0.690 0.087 0.965 0,061 0.941 0.083 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.250 0.250 0.675 0.675 0.675 0.675 0.675 Green ratio, g/C = 227 327 457 1165 527 1192 1013 Lane group ca acit , c = 33.7 21.7 2.9 21.6 2.8 17.9 2.9 Average lane group delay = A C A Lane group LOS = D C A C 16.5 Average approach delay= 33.7 21.7 21.0 C Approach LOS = D C C INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C 19.9 seelveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 194 82 303 81 303 90 95th percentile queue, feet = 179 Overcapacity average queue,feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Home Ave. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build 1:15 PM 1/19/99 ©1996 RSG, Inc. HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 48 35 389 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 16 13 1484 819 Final Year = 2005 RT 213 29 4 26 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 19 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 73 5 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 48 35 408 25 TH 16 13 1557 824 Controller = semi actuated RT 214 29 4 26 CBD? N TOTAL 278 77 1970 874 3198 Lost Time Per Phase = 3' LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = I 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = ] I.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Phase -> 1 2 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through Y Right Y Southbound Left Through Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = Yellow+All Red = .,..l0 7 o..,,rh• ('v = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate =I, Lane group v/c ratio, X Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 0-rrnnarity average nueue_ feet = Y Y Y Y Y 12 18 5 6 80 sec EB LT R 64 214 0.187 0.622 0.225 0.225 340 344 19.1 23.7 C C 22.6 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 y y Y y y Y Y Y Y 12 16 6 5 WB NB LT R L TR 48 29 408 1639 0.143 0.084 0.860 0.934 0.225 0.225 0.489 0.488 336 344 475 1755 18.9 18.6 23.4 17.2 C C C C 18.8 18.5 C C 16.4 see/veh 102 192 96 87 216 296 L TR 25 892 0.082 0.524 0.175 0.475 299 1703 22.4 9.1 C B 9.5 B 86 193 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Mall 189 Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM LT Base Year = 1998 26 20 45 1 Base: TH 8 9 1904 1135 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT DHV adjust = 1.00 0 0 2 0 Development: 0 0 92 7 Total Growth = 1.00 TH RT 0 0 5 0 Add dev YIN = 26 20 9 47 1996 1 1142 Movement Volumes: LT Controller = semi actuated TH RT 8 0 0 5 0 CBD? N TOTAL 3254 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 34 29 2048 1143 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 3 0 5 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 1 1 I Heavy vehicles, % = 10 8 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 Lane width = 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 11.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Y Westbound Left I Y Throughl Y Northbound Left Y Through Y Y Right I Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Y Right I Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 3 30 10 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 80 sec EB WB NB Cycle Length: Cv = iERVICE. SB I Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci c-=-1 verage lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = :CTION LOS & DELAY = L T 26 8 0.077 0.023 0.213 0.213 336 343 19.2 18.9 C C L 20 0.058 0.213 344 19.1 C T 9 0.026 0.213 349 19.0 C L 47 0.175 0.163 266 22.0 C T 2096 0.994 0.613 2109 18.2 C L 1 0.011 0.063 100 26.7 D T 1199 0.692 0.513 1731 9.0 B I I 19.1 C 19.1 C 18.3 C 9.0 B B 15 serlveh I ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 78 84 79 97 288 76 225 ipacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Svstems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/I-189 Ramp C Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = PM Base: LT TH RT Development: LT TH Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1998 2005 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 873 0 0 0 133 933 1911 0 713 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 100 7 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = 0 0 0 876 133 713 0 1033 0 0 1918 0 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT TOTAL 46731 Controller = semi actuated CBD? I Lost Time Per Phase =L N 3 0 1722 1033 1918 LANE GEOMETRY: EB Number of approach Lanes = 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N Right turn allowed and shared? N Lane width = 0.0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 WB 2 1 0 y N 12.0 12.0 0.0 NB 2 0 0 N N 12.0 0.0 0.0 SB 3 0 0 n Y 12.0 0.0 0.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 2 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 10 10 10 0 1 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 34 35 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane rou ca aci , c = EB WB NB SB LT 1060 0.642 0.463 1651 T 1085 0.617 0.463 1758 TR 2109 0.808 0.463 2610 Average lane group delay Lane group LOS Average approach delay= Approach LOS INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = = 13.1 B 10.4 B 12.6 B = 13.1 B 10.4 B 12.6 B = B 12.2 sedveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 221 224 252 nvP..TCnnaCity average oueue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Swift St. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Base: LT TH RT Development: LT TH RT EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth = Add dev Y/N = PM 1998 2005 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 237 0 227 0 0 2086 2018 0 418 213 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 249 11 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 238 0 418 0 2335 238 227 2029 0 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT TOTAL Controller = semi actuated CBD? 5486 Lost Time Per Phase = N 3 0 656 2574 2256 LANE GEOMETRY: EB Number of approach Lanes = 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 Left turn allowed and shared? N Right turn allowed and shared? N Lane width = 0.0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 WB 2 1 1 N N 0.0 10.0 10.0 NB 3 0 0 N y 11.0 0.0 0.0 SB 3 1 0 n n 12.0 12.0 0.0 TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peels, peels/hr = Pedestrian button? Pedstrian button time, sec = EB WB NB SB. 0 0 0 2 2 2 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 10 10 10 0 2 N 0 0 1.00 0 N 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival tyE =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Ped Westbound Left y Through Right y y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 41 15 Yellow+A11 Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length: Cv = 80 sec EL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB Lane group movements = L R 418 TR 2831 L 227 T 2130 Adjusted flow rate = 238 0.678 0.755 0.965 0.723 0.803 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.213 0.375 0.550 0.713 0.713 Green ratio, g/C = 351 554 2934 314 2654 Lane group capacity, c = 25.6 20.6 14.9 21 2 Average lane group delay = C C A A Lane group LOS = D C B 22.4 14.9 4.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B A B 11.4 seelveh VTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = EUING ANALYSIS: 204 245 278 111 233 95th percentile queue, feet = n-rsoe nueue_ feet = _ __ RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 11:24 AM 2/16/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Queen City Parkway Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM (Base: LT 319 0 0 0 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 2342 2063 Final Year = 2005 RT 182 0 0 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 299 12 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 319 0 0 0 TH 0 0 2641 2075 Controller = semi actuated RT 183 0 0 0 CBD? N TOTAL 502 0 2641 2075 5217 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 0 2 2 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 1 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N N N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Right y Ped Westbound Left Through Right Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right Ped Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 12 57 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R T T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 319 183 2773 2178 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 1.030 0.659 1.027 0.807 Green ratio, g/C = 0.175 0.175 0.750 0.750 Lane grou2 capacity, c = 310 277 2701 2701 Average lane group delay = 73.3 27.3 18.1 1.0 Lane group LOS = F D C A 56.6 18.1 1.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = E C A B 15 seelveh NTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 184 214 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = 265 761 1:15 PM 1119199 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 © 1996 RSG, Inc. FResources Group,White t2005Design tion, Vermont =aa VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: Time of Day = PM EB WB NB SB Base Year = 1998 Base: LT 129 19 208 52 Final Year = 2005 TH 13 12 1960 1648 Growth/yr = 1.00 RT 234 59 28 105 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 29 275 0 13 Total Growth = 1.00 TH 0 Add dev Y/N = RT 2 0 4 0 Movement Volumes: LT 129 19 237 52 Controller= semi actuated TH 13 12 2235 1661 CBD? N RT TOTAL 236 59 32 105 4789 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 378 89 2503 1818 NB SBFTRAFFIROAD COND.: EB WB NB S O EB WB LANE GEOMETRY: 3 Grade, % = 0 0 O Number of approach Lanes =L12015.0 vy vehicles, % _ 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes =1 djacent parking? N N N N No. of exclusive right-tum lanes =0 aneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 on Left turn allowed and shared. Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Right rum allowed and shared?y N PHF = 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Lane width =0 11.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive left-tum lane width =0 12.0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width =0 10 0 10 Pedstrian button timestrian e, e = 0 0 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 Arrival type= 3 3 4 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 33 6 9 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 C cle Len¢th: Cy = 80 sec SB -SERVICE: EB WB L TR L T R Lane group movements = LT R LTR 237 2380 52 1744 1744 105 Adjusted flow rate = 142 236 89 0.462 0.892 1.039 0.252 0.110 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.886 0.459 0.150 0.638 0.113 0.807 .60 0.110 Green ratio, g/C = 0.138 0.325 0.138 265 2291 113 950 Lane ou ca aci ,c = 160 515 194 43.9 28.0 27.3 6.7 3.0 Average lane group delay = 53.6 16.8 . 254 .0 D B A Lane group LOS = E C D E 29.5 7.1 Average approach delay= �•6 25.4 D B Approach LOS = D D ,ECTION LOS & DELAY = C 21 sedveh ANALYSIS: 143 189 118 212 101 256 9E 95th percentile queue, feet = 910 ;r, —empe queue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Laurel Hill Drive Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 266 16 100 118 Base Year = 1998 TH 29 6 1762 1561 Final Year = 2005 RT 122 72 6 337 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 17 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 308 15 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 1 0 1 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 266 16 6 117 2070 118 1576 Controller = TH RT 29 123 72 7 337 CBD?TOTAL [!n 418 94 2194 2031 4737 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 3 2 3 4 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 1 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2. No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = I 1 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? N y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N N y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width - 0 11L12.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width =0 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 11.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y y Right y y Southbound Left Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 32 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Length: Cy = 80 sec OF -SERVICE: EB L _ T R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 266 29 123 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.958 0.092 0.231 Green ratio, g/C = 0.175 0.175 0.338 Lane group capacity. c =1 278 315 534 delay = A=approachdelay= 56.0 21.0 0.01 LOS = E C A 37.1 delay= LOS = ;RSEELAY = D C 22.1 NG ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 222 88 120 y y y 6 12 6 5 WB NB LT R L TR 23 72 117 2181 0.078 0,144 0.529 1.046 0.175 0.325 0.125 0.600 288 497 221 2085 21.0 14.5 28.7 32.7 C B D D 16.1 32.5 C D 85 102 132 L T R 118 1655 337 0.592 0.810 0.374 0.113 0.588 0.588 199 2043 899 30.8 7.3 4.1 D B A 8.1 B 133 252 177 1:15 PM 1/19/99 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Baldwin Ave Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM LT 31 15 5 38 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 0 0 1679 1394 Final Year = 2005 RT 17 54 16 16 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 1 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: 0 0 326 16 Total Growth = 1.00 TH RT 0 0 3 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 31 15 0 6 2005 38 1410 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 0 17 54 19 16 N TOTAL 48 69 2030 1463 as 3611 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 2 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 1.00 Lane width = 0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = �o� 0.0 12.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival t = 3 3 4 4 SING PTN• Phase > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHA Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Southbound y Thy 4Red= y Phase Times: Actual G54 15 Yellow+All 6 5 Cycle Len C = 80 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB L TR Lane group movements = LR LR L 6 TR 2125 38 1497 Adjusted flow rate = 48 0.151 69 0.226 0.006 0.829 0.064 0.584 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.213 0.213 0.713 0.713 0.713 0.713 Green ratio, g/C = 318 304 979 2562 588 2562 Lane rou ca aci , c = 19.5 19.9 0.5 2.5 0.5 1.1 Average lane group delay = A A Lane group LOS = C C A A 1.1 Average approach delay= 19.5 19.9 2.5 A Approach LOS = C C A INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = A 2.5 see/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 96 105 76 232 81 170 95th percentile queue, feet = nvP�ranarity nvern Pe queue. feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:05 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 71McIntosh Ave Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: Base: LT TH RT Development: LT TH RT EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = Base Year = Final Year = Growth/yr = DHV adjust = Total Growth - Add dev YIN = PM 1998 2005 1.00 1.00 1.00 115 16 97 12 12 5 1873 1590 75 18 12 94 0 0 19 0 0 0 360 17 1 0 2 0 115 12 76 16 5 18 116 2233 14 12 1607 94 Movement Volumes: LT TH RT Controller = [!!I CBD?TOTAL 4317 Lost Time Per Phase = 203 39 2362 1713 LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = Left turn allowed and shared? Right turn allowed and shared? Lane width = Exclusive left -turn lane width = Exclusive right -turn lane width = EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: Grade, % = Heavy vehicles, % = Adjacent parking? Number of maneuvers, Nm = Buses, Nb = PHF = Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = Pedestrian button? EB WB NB SB 2 1 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 y y n n n y y Y 12.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 2 2 N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 N N N 0 2 N 0 0 1.00 0 N PHASING Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =L 3 3 4 4 Phase -> 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 Eastbound Right Ped Westbound Left Northbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 41 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Len Cy = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB LT R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 127 76 Lane group We ratio, X = 0.374 0.227 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 0.213 Lane group ca aci , c = 339 336 Average lane group delay = 20.8 19.9 Lane group LOS = C C 20.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B 8.8 ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet 130 108 -nnnrity nveraQe nueue. feet = y y y y y y 15 WB NB SB LTR L TR L TR 39 116 2359 12 1787 0.126 0.380 0.920 0.018 0.909 0.213 0.713 0.713 0.550 0.550 311 304 2564 641 1965 19.4 10.1 4.9 4.2 12.2 C B A A B 19.4 5.2 12.1 C B B 92 93 251 78 286 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/llolmes Road Extension Location: So, Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day =E Base: LT 177 71 10 30 Base Year = TH 2 3 1432 1295 Final Year =RT 24 274 10 27 Growth/yr =Development: LT 0 39 0 18 DHV adjust =TH Total Growth = 1 4 0 0 RT 0 380 2 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 177 110 7 10 1432 48 1295 Controller = semi actuated TH 3 RT 24 654 12 27 CBD? N TOTAL 204 771 1454 1370 37991Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 4 4 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 N N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N 0 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 0 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 N Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N 10 Pedstrian button time, see = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival t — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 38 20 6 Yellow+All Red = 6 5 5 Cycle Len Cy = 80 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB LT R LTR LTR Lane group movements = LTR 117 654 1526 1438 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = 204 0.691 0.362 0.982 0.961 0.249 Green ratio, g/C = 0.275 0.275 0.413 0.513 0.713 5788 Lane grou ca aci , c = 295 323 666 1588 0 Average lane group delay = 24.3 18.1 40.5 19.4 A A Lane group LOS = C C E C 0.6 Average approach delay= 24.3 37.1 19.4 A Approach LOS = C D C INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C 16.5 seelveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 182 122 314 269 165 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue, feet = RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont 0 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 134 62 41 34 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 11 1155 1182 Final Year = 2005 RT 56 166 30 88 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 1 59 0 3 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 5 89 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 3 7 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 135 121 41 37 TH 8 11 1160 1271 Controller = semi actuated RT 56 167 33 95 CBD? N TOTAL 199 299 1234 1404 3135 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right-tum lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 16.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y y Through y y Right y y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 19 6 39 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 Cycle Len Cy = 80 sec -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group We ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LTR 199 0.887 0.263 224 LTR 299 0.893 0.263 334 LTR 1296 1.024 0.525 1265 LTR 1474 0.715 0.663 2063 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 43.8 E 38.9 D 33.3 D 3.2 A 43.8 E 38.9 D 33.3 D 3.2 A C 21 sec/veh {ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = canacity averaee queue, feet = 182 __ __ 222 376 201 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analvsis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB_ SB Time of Day = PM LT 0 227 0 121 Base Year = 1998 Base: TH 0 0 1010 1343 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 113 122 0 Growth/yr= 1,00 LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 4 82 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 227 0 128 1425 Controller = semi actuated TH 0 0 1014 CBD? N RT 0 113 122 0 TOTAL 0 340 1137 1553 3030 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 2 2 Grade, %= 0 0 0 4 0 3 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 0 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 N N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 1 0 Adjacent parking? N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n n n Buses, Nb = 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 0 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 11.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 P7 AN• Phase > ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHASING Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Through Y Right Y Y Ped Southbound Left Y Y Through Y Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 46 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len Cv = 80 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB T R L T Lane group movements = L 227 R 113 1014 122 128 1425 Adjusted flow rate = 0.742 0.230 0,938 0.099 0.496 1.065 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.175 0.313 0.613 0.825 0.750 0.750 Green ratio, g/C = 307 490 1082 1238 259 1337 Lane group capacity, c = 30.1 15.5 1, 0.0 10.9 35.9 delay = B A B D p LOS = D C 33Dh :Avera:geap1proachdelay= 25.3 12.9 LOS = D BDINTERSELAY = C 25 seelveh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 204 118 318 87 93 95th percentile queue, feet = 1539 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:05 PM 1/21199 Resource Svstems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: I HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 24 71 2 27 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 983 1266 Final Year = 2005 RT 20 32 23 20 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 4 75 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 24 71 1 2 987 34 1341 Controller = Fserni actuated TH RT 1 20 32 23 20 CBD? N TOTAL 45 104 4 012 1395 25571 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 1 1 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y y y Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 1�0�00 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type =1 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 61 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Len the CY = -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 80 sec EB LTR 45 0,249 0.125 181 WB LTR 104 0.528 0.125 197 NB LTR 1012 0.762 0.800 1328 SB LTR 1395 1.232 0.800 1132 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = IECTION LOS & DELAY = 24.2 C 27.0 D 1.4 A 128.8 F 24.2 C 27.0 D 1.4 A 128.8 F F 72.4 sec/veh ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = r nnrity weraQe aueue. feet = 97 _ 126 212 4174 RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:15 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont ©1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 127 59 40 32 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 10 1097 1122 Final Year = 2005 RT 54 157 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 LT 0 0 0 2 DHV adjust = 1.00 Development: TH 0 0 3 68 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 5 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 127 8 59 10 40 1100 34 1190 Controller = semi actuated TH RT 54 157 28 89 CBD? N TOTAL 189 225 1167 1313 2895 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 1 2 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 6 4 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 N No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 0 0 1 Adjacent parking? N N N 0 Left turn allowed and shared? Y Y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? Y Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 0 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 11.0 11.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 N Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 Pedestrian button? N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 18 51 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 Cycle Len C = 80 sec SB LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB L TR L T R Lane group movements = LTR LTR 225 40 1128 34 1190 89 Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = 189 0.833 0.690 0.090 0.968 0.067 0,999 0.088 Green ratio, g/C = 0.250 0,250 0.675 0.675 0.675 0.675 509 1192 0.675 1013 Lane rou ca aci ,c = 227 327 441 1165 2.9 Average lane group delay = 33.7 21.7 Lane group LOS = D C 7-Ha Average approach delay= 33.7 21.7 Approach LOS = D C INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = C 24.1 sec/veh QUEUING ANALYSIS: 179 194 82 304 81 315 91 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue,feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 127 59 40 32 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 10 1097 1122 Final Year = 2005 RT 54 157 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 2 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 3 68 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 5 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT TH 127 8 59 10 40 1100 34 1190 Controller = semi actuated RT 54 157 28 0 CBD? N TOTAL 189 225 1167 1224 28061 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y n N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right y Y Ped Northbound Left y Through Y Right Y Southbound Left ,y Through Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 35 6 12 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 5 80 sec Cycle Len the C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT R 135 54 0.437 0.191 0.175 0.175 308 284 L TR 59 167 0.328 0.571 0.100 0.175 179 292 L TR 40 1184 0.250 0.722 0,100 0.475 159 1640 L 34 0.210 0.100 162 T 1250 0.745 0.475 1678 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = 19.7 C 18.2 C 22.0 C 21.5 C 21.6 C 12.0 B 21.5 C 12.3 B 19.3 C 21.6 C 12.3 B 12.6 B B 13.6 se lveh 7n1,NGANALYSIS:95th percentile queue, feet = 137 100 104 176 95235 92 245 rarcannnim average queue. feet = _ _ Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build 1:24 PM 1/21/99 © 1996 RSG, Inc. , HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM BaSe: LT 24 71 2 27 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 983 1266 Final Year = 2005 RT 20 32 23 20 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 4 75 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 24 71 2 34 TH 1 1 987 1341 Controller = semi actuated RT 20 32 23 20 CBD? N TOTAL 45 104 1012 1395 2557 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY. EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, % = 0 0 0 0' No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 nraA crNn PVArv- Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Righti y Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 41 13 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB i I LT R 25 20 0.092 0.073 0.188 0.188 273 277 LTR 104 0.354 0.188 294 L TR 2 1061 0.009 0.519 0.150 0.550 248 2042 L 34 0.135 0.150 248 TR 1430 0.699 0.550 2045 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 20A C 20.3 C 21.8 C 23. C 66.0 B 24.3 C 7.4 B 20.4 C 21.8 C 6.0 B 7.8 B B 7.9 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 84 122 76 195 91 241 n__;_." 1111P fPP, = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 227 0 121 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1010 1343 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 113 122 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 0 0 0 4 7 82 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 0 227 0 128 TH 0 0 1014 1425 Controller =r!�� RT 0 113 122 0 CBD?TOTAL 0 340 1137 1553 3030 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Y Westbound Left Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 13 36 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 227 113 1194 128 1496 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.611 0.159 0.681 0.418 0.832 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.213 0.438 372 709 0.488 1754 0.188 0.488 307 1799 Average lane group delay = 23.8 10.3 10.0 23.5 12.4 Lane group LOS = C B B C B 19.3 10.0 13.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B B B 12.7 seclveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 199 110 232 133 275 Overcapacity averse queue,feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB S Base: LT 134 62 41 3 TH 8 11 1155 118 RT 56 166 30 8 Development: LT 1 59 0 TH 0 0 5 8 RT 0 1 3 Movement Volumes: LT 135 121 41 3 TH 8 11 1160 127 RT 56 167 33 9 TOTAL 199 299 1234 14 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB S Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 Left turn allowed and shared? y y N Right turn allowed and shared? N y y Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: g 4 04 Time of Day = PM Base Year = 1998 2 Final Year = 2005 g Growth/yr = 1.00 3 DHV adjust = 1.00 9 Total Growth = 1.00 7 Add dev Y/N = 7 I Controller = semi actuated 5 CBD? N 31351 Lost Time Per Phase =L 3 B TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 1 Heavy vehicles, %= 3 1 6 4 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival twe = 3 3 4 4 z n [ F, 7 9 ,—HAJ/lV(, ELAN: — - Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left Y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left Y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 31 23 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Length: -SERVICE. Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = C = 80 sec EB WB NB SB LT R 143 56 0-656 0.070 0.313 0.500 218 810 LTR 299 0.743 0.313 402 L TR 41 1253 0.171 0,826 0.150 0.425 238 1518 L 37 0.153 0.150 243 TR 1435 0.933 0.425 1537 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = IECTION LOS & DELAY = 22.8 C 7.9 B 23.7 C 24.4 C 15.5 C 24.4 C 20.7 C 18.6 C 23.7 C 15.8 C 20.8 C C 19 sec/veh 'ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 130 91 214 94 263 93 292 -nariw average aueue,feet = _. Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:35 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 177 71 10 30 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 3 1432 1295 Final Year = 2005 RT 24 274 10 27 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 1 39 4 0 0 18 0 DHV adjust= Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 380 2 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 177 110 10 48 TH 3 7 1432 1295 Controller = semi actuated RT 24 654 12 27 CBD? N TOTAL 204 771 1454 1370 37991 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y Lane width = 15.0 N 12.0 N 12.0 Y 12.0 Buses, Nb = PHF = 0 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 1 32 18 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R L T L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 204 117 654 10 1504 48 1388 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.770 0.385 0.831 0.048 0.941 0.138 0.743 Green ratio, WC = Lane group capacity, c = 0.250 265 0.250 304 0.488 787 0.125 0.438 202 1599 0.200 0.513 347 1867 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = 29.9 D 19.3 C 18.7 C 25.6 20.6 D C 21.1 9.6 C B 29.9 D 18.8 C 20.6 C 10.0 B Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C 16.9 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 185 124 286 80 297 96 250 overcapacity average queue,feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:33 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 127 59 40 32 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 10 1097 1122 Final Year = 2005 RT 54 157 28 84 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 2 DHV adjust= 1.00 TH 0 0 3 68 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 5 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 127 59 40 32 TH 8 10 1097 1122 Controller = RT 54 157 28 0 CBD?TOTAL E71 189 225 1164 1154 2733 Lost Time Per Phase = LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB' 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y n N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width =1 12.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width =1 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width =1 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Y Right Y Westbound Left Y Through Y Right y Y Ped Northbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Through Y Phase Times: ActualGreen=1 6 35 6 12 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 5 5 Cycle Length: C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT R 135 54 0.437 0.191 0.175 0.175 308 284 L TR 59 167 0.328 0.571 0.100 0.175 179 292 L TR 40 1181 0.250 0.696 0.100 0.475 159 1697 L 32 0.198 0.100 162 T 1178 0.679 0.475 1736 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 19.7 C 18.2 C 22.0 C 21.5 C 21.6 C 11.5 B 21.4 C 11.3 B 19.3 C 21.6 C 11.8 B 11.6 B B 13 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 137 100 104 176 95 235 91 234 r),r r anaciry average nueue. feet = _ Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:23 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/1-ocust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 24 71 2 27 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 1 983 1266 Final Year = 2005 RT 20 32 23 20 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 0 0 0 0 4 7 75 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 24 71 2 27 TH 1 1 983 1266 Controller = semi actuated RT 20 32 23 20 CBD? N TOTAL 45 104 1008 1313 24711 Lost Time Per Phase - 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Grade, %= Heavy vehicles, % = No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 41 13 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 25 20 104 2 1057 27 1351 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.092 0.073 0.354 0.009 0.517 0.107 0.661 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = 0.188 273 0.188 277 0.188 294 0.150 0.550 248 2042 0.150 0.550 248 2044 Average lane group delay = 20.4 20.3 21.8 23.8 6.0 24.2 7.0 Lane group LOS = C C C C B C B 20.4 21.8 6.0 7.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 7.6 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 86 84 122 76 195 88 231 Overcapacity average queue,feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:33 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 0 227 0 121 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1010 1343 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 113 122 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 7 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 4 82 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 0 0 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 227 0 121 TH 0 0 1010 1343 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 113 122 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 340 1133 1464 29371 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 130 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 z n [ F 7 8 YCYHJ/!vV ri,nivr - - - Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 13 36 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len C = 80 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = B QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =� r)-- nnrity nveraee queue. feet = WB NB SB L R TR L TR 227 113 1189 121 1410 0.611 0.159 0.678 0.395 0.784 0.213 0.438 0.488 0.188 0.488 372 709 1754 307 1799 23.8 10.3 9.9 23.4 11.4 C B B C B 19.3 9.9 12.4 C B B 199 110 232 130 263 Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:33 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = PM Base: LT 134 62 41 34 Base Year = 1998 TH 8 11 1155 1182 Final Year = 2005 RT 56 166 30 88 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 1 59 0 3 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 5 89 Total Growth - [:::1.00 RT 0 1 3 7 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT TH 134 8 62 11 41 1155 34 1182 Controller = semi actuated RT 56 166 30 88 CBD? N TOTAL 198 239 1226 1305 2967 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 l 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 C Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left Y Through y Right y Souhbound Left Y Through y Right y E Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 33 21 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 80 sec C cle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB LT 142 0.704 0.288 201 R 56 0.073 0.475 770 LTR 239 0.584 0.288 408 L 41 0.171 0.150 238 TR 1245 0.774 0.450 1607 L 34 0.141 0.150 243 TR 1334 0.819 0.450 1628 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 26.5 8.7 D B 20.1 C 24.4 13.1 C B 24.3 C 14.0 B 21.4 C 20.1 C 13.5 B 14.3 B B 14.9 sedveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 131 91 194 94 253 91 266 nvrrcanaciry average oueue. feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:33 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 Design Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: EB WB NB SB VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: Time of Day = PM Base: LT TH Base Year = Final Year = 1998 2005 177 71 10 30 2 3 1432 1295 RT 24 274 10 27 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT TH DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 0 39 0 18 1 4 0 0 RT 0 380 2 0 Add dev YIN = n 177 2 71 3 10 1432 30 1295 Movement Volumes: LT TH Controller = semi actuated RT 24 274 10 27 CBD? N'' TOTAL 3355 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 203 348 1452 1352 EB WB NB SB LANE GEOMETRY: Number of approach Lanes = EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.. Grade, %= 0 0 _ 0 0 1 2 3 3 No. of exclusive left -turn Ianes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N 10 PLAN: Eastbound Westbound Pedstnan button time, sec = 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left Through Right Ped Left Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Riaht Y Southbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 6 32 Yellow+All Red = 5 5 6 Cycle Len C = 80 sec -SERVICE: EB LTR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 203 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.738 Green ratio, g/C = 0.213 Lane group capacity, c = 275 Average lane group delay = 29.1 Lane group LOS = D 29.1 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = D B 14.4 sect eh ECTION LOS & DELAY = ANALYSIS: _ 95th percentile queue, feet = 189 Y Y Y Y Y Y 15 5 WB NB LT R L T 74 274 10 1504 0,264 0.349 0.060 0.941 0.213 0.488 0.100 0.438 280 787 162 1599 20.1 9.7 27.4 20.6 C B D C 11.9 20.6 B C 107 178 80 297 L TR 30 1398 0.073 0.663 0.238 0.575 412 2095 18.5 6.0 C B 6.3 B 88 226 Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:42 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/13ay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 87 3 6 21 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 651 538 Final Year = 2005 RT 14 8 7 56 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 6 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 44 6 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 1 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 93 3 6 21 TH 0 0 695 544 Controller = semi actuated RT 14 9 7 0 CBD? N TOTAL 107 12 707 565 13911 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y n N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN. Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right y Y Ped Northbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Through Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 29 6 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R L R L TR L T Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 93 14 3 9 6 737 21 571 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.371 0.061 0.014 0.040 0.031 0.466 0.112 0,354 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.143 0.114 0.143 0.114 0.457 0.114 0.457 Lane group capacity-, = 251 231 204 236 182 1582 185 1615 _c Average lane group delay = 18.0 16.8 17.8 16.7 17.8 8.6 18.0 8.0 Lane group LOS = C C C C C B C B 17.8 17.0 8.7 8.4 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 9.4 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 114 81 76 79 77 147 84 125 overcapacity averse queue, feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:24 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 26 14 36 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 646 774 Final Year = 2005 RT 2 26 36 25 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 2 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 55 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 28 14 36 25 TH 0 1 701 781 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 28 36 25 CBD? N TOTAL 30 43 772 830 16761 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 10 29 15 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len Cv = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 28 2 43 36 773 25 846 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.073 0.006 0A I l 0.127 0.457 0.087 0.499 Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = 0.243 382 0.243 359 0.243 389 0.171 283 0.457 1691 0.171 283 0.457 1696 Average lane group delay = 15.5 15.3 15.7 20.0 8.3 19.9 8.6 Lane group LOS = C C C C B C B 15.5 15.7 8.8 8.9 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B B B 9.1 seelveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 85 76 91 89 152 85 162 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue, feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:42 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 59 0 85 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1274 781 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 150 149 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 59 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 7 0 0 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 0 59 0 86 TH 0 0 1333 788 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 157 149 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 216 1482 873 2571 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Through Right Ped Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 40 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB L R TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 59 157 1556 86 827 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.235 0.323 0.703 0.458 0.365 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.300 0.614 0.114 0.614 Lane group capacity, c = 250 486 2212 187 2266 Average lane group delay = 20.3 14.61 4.3 25.2 2.8 Lane group LOS = C B A D A 16.2 4.3 5.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C A A B 5.5 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 100 128 208 112 128 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity average queue,feet = Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:42 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bartlett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 48 7 28 125 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 971 827 Final Year = 2005 RT 15 27 70 69 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 3 6 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 66 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 43 1 Add dev Y/N = Movement Volumes: LT 51 13 28 126 TH 2 2 1037 835 Controller = semi actuated RT 15 29 113 70 CBD? N. TOTAL 68 44 1178 1031 __L221 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left-tum lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Northbound Left I Y y y Southbound Left Y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 38 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 Cycle Len C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group We ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group ca aci , c = EB WB NB SB LT R 53 15 0.222 0.028 0.143 0.329 239 532 LTR 44 0.196 0.143 223 L TR 28 1207 0.123 0.583 0.143 0.586 227 2070 L 126 0.546 0.143 231 TR 950 0.449 0.586 2117 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 20.3 C 12.1 B 20.2 C 21.6 C 4.5 A 24.6 C 3.8 A 18.5 C 20.2 C 4.9 A 6.3 B B 6.2 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 97 80 93 87 172 128 146 Overranacity averaee aueue, feet = ___ Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:42 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 31 8 5 246 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 4 1078 1037 Final Year = 2005 RT 6 27 35 52 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 TH 2 4 5 0 0 503 0 DHV adjust = Total Growth = 1.00 1.00 RT 0 31 29 0 Add dev YIN = Movement Volumes: LT 31 12 5 749 TH 3 9 1078 1037 Controller = semi actuated RT 6 58 0 52 CBD? N TOTAL 40 79 1084 1838 30411 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right tutus on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 13 8 21 6 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE. EB WB NB SB LTR LT R L T L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 40 21 58 5 1132 749 1144 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.218 0.111 0.063 0.015 0.904 1.041 0.581 Green ratio, g/C = Lane rou ca aci , c = 0.114 184 0.114 192 0.571 923 0,214 0.343 347 1253 0.414 0.543 719 1970 Average lane group delay = 21.5 21.1 5.1 17.2 21.1 47.3 5.9 Lane group LOS = C C B C C E B 21.5 C 9.4 B 21.1 C 22.8 C Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C 21.8 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 92 84 87 77 243 190 Overcapacity average queue, feet = 626 Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:37 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Bay Rd/Executive Dr. Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 87 3 6 21 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 651 538 Final Year = 2005 RT 14 8 7 56 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 6 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 44 6 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 1 0 1 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT TH 87 0 3 0 6 651 21 538 Controller = semi actuated RT 14 8 7 0 CBD? N TOTAL 101 11 663 559 13341 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 2 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? Y n N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N Y Y N Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 3 3 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right y Y Ped Northbound Left y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Through Y Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 29 6 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 5 Cycle Len C = 70 sec LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB L R L R Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 87 14 3 8 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.347 0.061 0.014 0.036 Green ratio, g/C = 0,143 0.143 0.114 0.143 Lane group capacity, c = 251 231 204 236 Average lane group delay = 17.8 16.8 17.8 16.7 Lane group LOS = C C C C 17.7 17.0 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C B 9.3 see/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 111 81 76 79 nvPrennaciry average queue. feet = NB _ SB L TR 6 691 0.031 0.437 0.114 0.457 182 1582 L T 21 565 0.112 0.350 0.114 0.457 185 1615 17.8 8.5 C B 18.0 8.0 C B 8.6 B 8.4 B 77 141 84 125 SOUTH-AM-nB BAY Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:24 PM 1/21/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Locust Hill/Pine Haven Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 26 14 36 25 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 1 646 774 Final Year = 2005 RT 2 26 36 25 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 2 0 0 0 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 55 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 26 14 36 25 TH 0 1 646 774 Controller = semi actuated RT 2 26 36 25 CBD?I N TOTAL 28 41 717 823 1610 Lost Time Per Phase = 1 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= 0 0 0 0 No. of exclusive left-tum lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 2 2 2 2 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n y y y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type — 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left Southbound Left Through Right Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = Yellow+All Red = Cycle Length: CY = SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = IECTION LOS & DELAY = B ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet =� rannrity average oueue. feet = y y y y y y 10 29 5 6 70 sec EB L R 26 2 0.067 0.006 0.243 0.243 386 359 15.5 15.3 C C 15.5 C 15 5 WB LTR 41 0.106 0.243 391 15.7 C 9 seciveh 85 76 90 NB L TR 36 715 0.127 0.423 0.171 0.457 283 1690 20.0 8.1 C B 8.7 B 89 144 SB L TR 25 838 0.087 0.494 0.171 0.457 283 1696 19.9 8.5 C B 8.8 85 161 PINE Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:37 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Allen Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 0 59 0 85 Base Year = 1998 TH 0 0 1274 781 Final Year = 2005 RT 0 150 149 0 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 0 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 59 7 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 7 0 0 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 0 59 0 85 TH 0 0 1274 781 Controller = semi actuated RT 0 150 149 0 CBD? N TOTAL 0 209 1423 865 24971 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 0 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 1 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 0 3 4 3 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? n n n n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? n n Y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 0.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 12.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN. Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Westbound Left Y Through Right Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 6 40 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: Cy = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = Lane group v/c ratio, X = Green ratio, g/C = Lane group capacity, c = EB WB NB SB L R 59 150 0.235 0.308 0.143 0.300 250 486 TR 1494 0.676 0.614 2211 L 85 0.453 0.114 187 TR 820 0.362 0.614 2266 Average lane group delay = Lane group LOS = Average approach delay= Approach LOS = 20.3 C 14.5 B 4.1 A 25.1 D 2.8 A 16.1 C 4.1 ``1 5.0 A B 5.4 seelveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 95th percentile queue, feet = 100 126 203 ill 127 Overcapacity averse queue. feet = - IT I I AAA � B JVVii i-r„vi � ALLEN Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:37 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7Bardett Bay Rd/Green Mtn Rd Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 48 7 28 125 Base Year = 1998 TH 2 2 971 827 Final Year = 2005 RT 15 27 70 69 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 3 6 0 1 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 0 0 66 8 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 2 43 1 Add dev Y/N = n Movement Volumes: LT 48 7 28 125 TH 2 2 971 827 Controller = semi actuated RT 15 27 70 69 CBD? N TOTAL 65 36 1069 1021 21901 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 2 1 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 3 1 6 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 1 0 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N N Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? N y y Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 12.0 15.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right -turn lane width = 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type - 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left y Through y Right Y y Ped Westbound Left y Through y Right y Ped Northbound Left Y Through y Right y Ped Southbound Left Y Through y Right y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green = 8 38 8 Yellow+All Red = 5 6 5 70 sec Cycle Length: C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LT R LTR L TR L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 50 15 36 28 1093 125 940 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.234 0.028 0,158 0.123 0.525 0.541 0.444 Green ratio, g/C = 0.143 0.329 0.143 0.143 0.586 0.143 0.586 Lane group ca aci ,c = 214 532 226 227 2080 231 2117 Average lane group delay = 20.3 12.1 20.0 21.6 4.2 24.5 3.8 Lane group LOS = C B C C A C A 18.4 20.0 4.7 6.3 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C C A B B 6.1 sec/veh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 96 80 90 87 160 127 145 95th percentile queue, feet = Overcapacity averse queue,feet = SOUTH-AM-nB BARTLETT Planned VAOT Shelburne Road Improvements RoadRunner -- Signal v5.2 -- HCM Third Edition 1994 1:37 PM 1/19/99 Resource Systems Group, White River Junction, Vermont © 1996 RSG, Inc. Intersection: US 7/Holmes Road Extension Location: So. Burlington, VT Analysis Period: 2005 AM Peak Hour - No Build HOURLY VOLUMES: VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS: EB WB NB SB Time of Day = AM Base: LT 31 8 5 246 Base Year = 1998 TH 1 4 1078 1037 Final Year = 2005 RT 6 27 35 52 Growth/yr = 1.00 Development: LT 0 4 0 503 DHV adjust = 1.00 TH 2 5 0 0 Total Growth = 1.00 RT 0 31 29 0 Add dev YIN = n Movement Volumes: LT 31 8 5 246 TH 1 4 1078 1037 Controller = semi actuated RT 6 27 0 52 CBD? N TOTAL 38 39 1084 1335 2496 Lost Time Per Phase = 3 LANE GEOMETRY: EB WB NB SB TRAFFIC & ROAD COND.: EB WB NB SB 0 0 0 0 Number of approach Lanes = 1 2 3 3 Grade, %= No. of exclusive left -turn lanes = 0 0 1 1 Heavy vehicles, % = 1 0 4 4 No. of exclusive right -turn lanes = 0 1 0 0 Adjacent parking? N N N N Left turn allowed and shared? y y N n Number of maneuvers, Nm = 0 0 0 0 Right turn allowed and shared? y N N Y Buses, Nb = 0 0 0 0 Lane width = 15.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PHF = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Exclusive left -turn lane width = 0.0 0.0 10.0 12.0 Conflicting Peds, peds/hr = 0 0 0 0 Exclusive right-tum lane width = 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian button? N N N N Pedstrian button time, sec = 10 10 10 10 Right turns on red, % = 0 0 0 0 Arrival type = 3 3 4 4 PHASING PLAN: Phase -> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Eastbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Westbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Y Y Ped Northbound Left Y Through Y Right Y Ped Southbound Left y Y Through Y Y Right Y Y Ped Phase Times: Actual Green =1 13 8 21 6 Yellow+All Red =1 5 6 6 5 70 sec Cycle Len C = LEVEL -OF -SERVICE: EB WB NB SB LTR LT R L T L TR Lane group movements = Adjusted flow rate = 38 12 27 5 1132 246 1144 Lane group v/c ratio, X = 0.201 0.065 0.029 0.015 0.904 0.342 0.581 Green ratio, g/C = 0.114 0.114 0.571 0.214 0.343 0.414 0.543 Lane group capacity, c = 190 191 923 347 1253 719 1970 Average lane group delay = 21.4 21.0 5.0 17.2 21.1 9.4 5.9 Lane group LOS = C C A C C B B 21.4 10.1 21.1 6.5 Average approach delay= Approach LOS = C B C B B 13.1 seelveh INTERSECTION LOS & DELAY = QUEUING ANALYSIS: 80 81 77 243 145 190 95th percentile queue, feet = 91 Overcapacity averse queue, feet = SOUTH-AM-nB HOLMES APPENDIX D ACCIDENT DATA VERMONT . AGENCY OF TRAIISPORTATIOH PAGE 153 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN DATE 0Z/18/98 IPROGRAM `HEN.. H5751 (YEARS CA: DATA 92 93 94 95 96 ROUTE: US-T SEQUENCE NO. OF SKID SYS CLAS. NUMER TOWN : N4ILEAGE MRIDD/YY TIME NEATHER . CAUSE . OF ACCIDENT TYPE OF ACCIDENT-- Imi FAT CODE M0. CODE 91 4441 SHELBURNE 4.32 9/23/93 1100 CLOUDY . INATTEiITION REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 s 42® s"VAUNNE 4.32 1/1T/92 1100 SMiNI FOLLOWING TOM( CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 N ZT41 SHELBURNE 4.3Z 8/24/95 1500 CLEAR. FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 M "*I SHELZURNE 4.32 101.2/92 1500. BLEAR • INATTENTION REAR -END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 3 409 SHELBUME 4.32 1/Z4/95+ 1wo Shull INATTEMTIONN REAR END COLLISION 0 0 0 4 0 S 3m .SHFL.GURNE 4.42 9/1NT/9.3 . 13ov ATHER/UMK :11WREWER PASSING TOR+ IaN�-aarP..: aIR, a 0 1 4 O a 2852 SHELEUANE 4*49 6/19/93 9900 . CLOUDY U_YURN OTHER -COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 a 2916 SHELAURN,E 4.49 7/22/93 1300 CLOUDY CARELESS BICYCLIST HIT BICYCLIST 1 0 1 4 0 M 4T90 SHELBURNE 4.49 IV ' /I% 1800 - CLOWY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR ENO COLLISION a 0 2 4 0 N 2431 SHELBURNE 4.!Fo . 6/29/92 TOO _ CLEAR IHATMTION REAR E" COLLIS OM 1 0 I 4 0 S. 369. SHELBURNE 4.53 1/ 8/94 2200 $MGM (FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TARRING-SBPP. DIR. 0 0 3 4 0 N 16-14 : SHELOURNE 4•58 MT/42 ._ZZ00-, _SI4UN - _ UOUORt, C3TATED HEAD UN _COLLISION 2 0 -2 4 a s 3240.. .SttELSORNNE +4,.60. 7/24193 2200 CLEM' wi Or CENTER HEAD ONl.-COLLISION 0 0 1 4 - 0 M 4432 . SHEL.EURINE 4.6+2 19/12/93 2700 ' RAIM - FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 0 W 3693 S"FLSURNE 4062 N3/2'3/9Z zZo0 CLO! T LIQUORP CITATED AT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 as S 396 SHEAAV# ME . 4.62 V16/9S 1500 � RAIN FOLl.tJ01ING TOO CLOSE-' REAR ENO ,COLLISION ® 0 1 4 Q a 785 . SHEL8UR1E 4.63 7/18/93 1500 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR .EMD'COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 N 41Z4 S"ELBVKW- _4a64 191 4/94 . MO CL8UDT._-. INATTENTION REAR .em-,,COLLISTQII 1 '0- 1 4 0 S _ 43a3 SHELBURNE . 4.64 10/ 9192 1100 RAIN INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 N 2318 SHEL 5URNE 4.64 8/10/96 1"0 • CLEAR FOLLOWING TOIL. CLOSE , REAR EMD COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 M 4145 StIELI URVE- +4*67 9127/93 1400 . CLEAR • INATTENTION REAR -END, COLLESTW . 0 a- 1 4 0 N 4612 SHELBURNE $.67 11Z1/ /92 2300 RAIN INATTENTION, REAR �OW COLLISION 4 0 S 4852 SHEL.EURIliE 4.68 11/ 1192 IEW CLEAR r-amomima TOO -CLOSE REAR mo ;SOL,i.,ISIQtt 0 0 l 4 O S 4410 SHELBURNE 4gll 11/18/93 1500 CLEAR INATTENTION, REAR IND _ COt:t,ESIOM 1 0 1 4 O M 363Z SHELBURNE 4.74 9/13/93 800 CLEAR BLINDED BY SUN HIT PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 4 0 s 1046 SNELBU+RNE 4.74 2/23/92 1200 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 1931 SHELBURME 4.T4 3/ 3193 $00 CL.000T IHATTENTIOH HEAD an COLLISION 0 a 1 4 0 S 1711 SHELBURNE 4.T4 6/12/94 1800 RAIN IaATTEMTIGN REAR END COLLISION. 1 0 1 4 0 S 3301 SHELBURNE 4.14 ll/ 9/95 1700 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR (END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 3249 SHELBURNE 4•T5 8/29194 ,TOO OTHER/U"K OP,POOR JUMMENT REAR FOR),COL:LISIOH 0 0 1 4 0 p 4F25 SHELBURNE 4.80 12/ 4/94 2400 CLO UUY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 4319 SHELBURNE 4.80 1A/ 6/93 MWO CLOUDY INATTEN,TIO" REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 S 3036 SHELBURNE 4.80 7/27/93 MG OTHER/URK IMPROPER PASSING OTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 4 4 S 3516 SHEL.BtJ ME 4.80 9/ 3/92 1Z00 RAIN FOL UVINNG TOO CLOSE (REAR iEIM COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 2630 SHELBURNE 4.80 9/ 5/93 2000 RAIN INATTENTIOM REAR Vw'CULL.ISION 0 0 l 4 0 S 4401 SHELBURNE 994.99 ll/19/93 1500 CL.OUPT INATTENTION, REAR :EMD coLuSEOM.• 0, 0 1 4 0 S 2903 SHELBURNE 994.99 4116/95 1400 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLUE NN.EAR END COL:tISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 3247, SHEL54NUtE 999.99 1/2?_/92 1600 CLEAR LIQUORs CITATED REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 4500 SHELBURNE 991.99 12/16/" 9900 CLEAR INATTENTIOR REAR EIM COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 S 999,94 Q 1 �4 3.600 0THER/UNK Ia3tTTE.I XPN _ KAR ElCp =lm 1 0 1 4 Q 1f 65S SOUTH lbUftL.114YON 0.0Z 2/AT/95 1900 CLOUDY SLOWING. T0Q CLOSE REAR EMO COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 1640 SOUTH DURLIPGTOM 0.03 4/2Z/92 2.Z90 RAIN, INATT"TIONN. REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 S 2916 SOUTH SURL.INGION8 0.03 ll/ 3/96 14,00 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 O N THIS ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HisINWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED IN AN ANALYSIS WITH -OTHER -ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION- VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 154 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT PILE RUN DATE 02/12/98 (PROGRAM NO. H379) YEARS OF DATA 92 43 94 95 96 ROUTES US-1 SEQUENCE NO. OF SKID- SYS CLIS. NUMBER! TOWN MLEAGE MFVDO/iT irm HEAIAEA CAUSE. -OF ACCIDENT TYPE .OF ACCIDENT INJ FAT , CODE RD. CODE 01 2933 SOUTH BUR JOGTON 0.9.1 -shw Lz 900 RAIN FaLLd1R4C TOO CLOSE REAR .ENO COLLLISION 1 0 4 44 0 Ry 2093 SOUTH RMLINGLON ®.03 3/30/94 1T00 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR, END COLLISION 0 0 .- 1 4t 0 S 2633 SOUTH BURLINGTON o.93 7/12/93 1700 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COL.LISIOMN 0 0 1 4 0 S 2166 SOUTH BURLINGTON! 0.04 5/21193 500 CL.OUCT 1NATTEN1I014 REAR'•EM COLLISION 1 0 1 y q S 3246 SOUTH . BURLINGTON OaD8 N/Z9194 16" CLOUDY CARELESS ' 6 NEGUMENT • REAR ENO .COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 4695 SOUTH BVRLIMfON 0.03 IIM/92 . iTOO CLEAR FOLLOWM6 _ TOO CLOSE . REARM COLLISION 0 0 1 4 Q S ZZZ5 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.09 'SF 9192 1.300 CLEAR INATTENTION OTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 44 0 N 2S39 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.14L 6/19192 1200 CLEAR INATTENTION! REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 9 N! 3999 SOUTLL BURLINGTON 0.10 9/19/9a! 1700 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR EIMD COLALISION 1 0 1 4 0 NL 1445 SOUTH OWLINCTON 0.10 3/ 9/96 1900 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR4ENO COLLISION 0 0 .1 4 o S 2883 .SOUTH-BLLMANGTON Colo 6/29/92 .11" CLOUDY IMATTENTM REARtEM.:COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 S 4ZT1 SOUTH'BURL:J[NFTONI._... Colo _1Ql_Z'7/9Z- 1280_ CLEAR _ FOLU_WjN6_TOO_gttUE REAR_RHO_COLLLSION 1 0 1 4 0 M, Z56Z SOUTH BtgTON! f#tLt O+lA6 7I13I94 2300 CLEAR OF rOOR JUDGMENT HIT BICT�CLIST i 0 1 4 0 E 1ZST SOUTH. BURLINGTON Colo 3/Z'l/94 3500 CLOUDY INATTENTION I REAR °END COLLISION 1 0 i ^4 o S 1144 SOUTH 8lMUNGTAN 0.10 3/i2/9+4 13oo CLEAR raLLawip6 Tag CLLaSE REAR EMD. COLLISION 0 0 1 y o M 356 SOVT'H-OURLIMYON 0.10 1/ 9/93 7b0O . CL.EAR! INATTE*TIt* REAR 'EHO'COLLIS1010 O 0 1 4 0 S 2493 SOUTH, SURUMTON o.10 5124/93 3300. RAW LIQU=j .CiTATED RT•�AHCL&-DRaADSIDE 1 C. L 4 0 S 3260 SOUTH 81URLXNCTL7M : 0.3.o 112A/� - _TOO CLEAR UP FOUR: JLd SMENT _ _MEAR ENO' COL�SIQN 0 0 ! 4 0 !'A ZT16 SOUK su tl. imfuN R .' li g/ 17/95 l600 CLEAR AiN FOLLiM6 TOD CLOSE REAR ENO CMAJSIUM 1 0 1 4 _ 0 IN z751 40UTH`01NtLINGTON OolZ e/27/95 ' 2200 CLEAR IMAjvEfffICM1 - REAR END COLLISION 1 0. 0 4 a IN e96 SOUM-;1NRLINRit4N MT.12 2fIWW 92 Too . CLOWT FO U MI NG ' TOo CLMJSE REAR •.ENO; COLLISION 1 0 z 4 0 IN 40�46 SOUTH BUR�NG7QM 04ils 9/ze/13 goo C1awy FQLLOb1in .TOO CLOSE REAR:END:COLLISION 0 0 2 4 a H 23445 SOUTH-SURLINGTM 0913 5/ZZ/92 14" CLEAR FOLLONiMMD TOO. CLOSE ftAR :EIMD COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 2314 SOUTH BURL3NGTON! 0.13 5raJ92 1500 McR/UNK . FOLLOVIlNC T90 CLOSE REAR, Eia COL LISIOi! 0 0 1 4 0 S 2974 SOUTH BURL.INGIUM 0.14 11/ 6/96 1700 CLEAR FOLLOW106. 00 CLOSE REAR •END COLLISION 1 0 2 4 O S 3146 ,SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.14 9/Z5/93 1700 CLEAR CARELESS . A NEGUGEHT REAR EIMD COLLISION 4 0 2 4 0 L'N 4306 SOUTH BURLION14 M O.2o i0/il/92 1300 CLEAR, FAILURE TO T1ELD RUM RT• ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 0 IN 1905 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.21 6/ 31" 1200 RAIN IMATTENTION . REAR END COLLISION 5 0 1 4 a N Z310 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0*23 '5/L5/9Z 1300 CLEAR FOLLOWINNG - TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 2 4 0 N 7601 SOUTNL SURLINGFUN Ow23 14/101.96 900 RAIN INATTENTION RT• AMLE-BROADSIDE 0 O 1 4 0 S 2051' .SOUTH 6VRLIN610M 0.23 WZ3/96 1700 CLOUDY FOMMKING TOO CLOSE REAR ENO.COLLISION 0 0 1 4 O S 4479 SOUTH BURLINGEUN Ow$3 10/ 3/92 1900 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END -COLLISION 3 0 1 44 0 N 133a SOUTH SURLINGWOM 0.23 41IW94 14400 CLOUDY DEFECTIVE BRAKES REAR-EM COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 1715 SOUTH SuRLINGT(m OoZ4 31ZU92 1200 CLEAR 'CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 35114 SOUTH SURL:IRGYMftL 0.29 9/' 7/92 1W FOL LOWIMNs' TOO CLOSE REAR ••END COLLISIONN 1. O 1 4 0 S 1®43 S01I ..BURLIMCF(m 0029 2/29/96 1900 . CLEAR INATTENTION _— REARsENO COLLISION Z 0 2 4 0 s 14se Sr M BURLINGTON o.z9 44/11/94 noo CLEAR FdLLlMt Td6- ctjft 3 REAR tMD tOL "SION 0 0 1 4 0 t! 1907 SOUTH BURLINGTON o.29 3116/94 1200 CLOUDY FOLLOMINML: TOO CLUSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 M 2500 SOUTH BURLINGTON Ow29 7/ 6/% 130o CL.OWT CANLELf$S BICYCLIST HIT BICYCLIST. 1 0 1 4 0 E 444-14 SOUTH BURLINGTON O.30 11/19/93 iT00 CLEAR INU1TTgoTiON #tEAR END COLUSiON a 0 1 4 0 S 441ze SOUTH, BURLINGTON 0.430 9/29/93 1600, CLOUDY FOLLO"ING TOO CLOSE REAR ENU:COLLISIONN 0 0 1 4: 0 a 7-966 SOUTH SURLINGTOM 0033 1/ 6/92 1600 CLOUDY FOLLONIrm"TOO CLOSE REM -F" COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 >t °31.26 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0635 1a/30/93 600SNOW EXCESSIVE SPEED MIT BUILDING, TO RT- 0 0 3 4 a N a. THIS ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY L:NN'ROVEHENLT PROJECT- THIS DATA SHUMD .NOT BE USED IN AN A"ALTSIS WITH OTHER ACCIDENTS AT ME SAM LOCATION. VERM!ONT,AGENCY Of TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE tPROGRAM Me I1575) YEARS OF DATA 9Z 93 94 95 F6 PAGE 155 C) RUN DATE 02/12/90 w ROUTE: US-7 SEQUENCE NO. OF $KID SYS CLAS- ONtiPtdDER i[iilM MILEAGE MM/OO/YV TIME' WEATHER CAUSE UP, ACCIDENT TYPE O F ACCIWNT I"J FAT CODE no. CODE- Dl 2&26 SOUTH 8MLINGTON 0.44 6/ 2/93 3500 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COt.LI'St(W " 2 0 1 0 H 2684 Sam .OURLIMGTGN 0.45 6/25/93 "00 CL.EM INATTENTION REAR EMD.COLLISION 0 R 1 4 0 H 4149 SOUTH SURLIMSTOH 0.45 9/Z9/93 1100 CLEAR, INATTENNTION REAR EM COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 f! 4365 SO;UTH'BURLINGTOH 0.45 11/'6/92 '2ZOO. SNOW CARELESS C *EGLIGEMT HIT .GUARARAIL'fUIGNT ' 0 0 1 4 0 Pl 3.36Z SUM, GURLIM61f3M 0.45 41 ' 1196 .1200 .. CLEAR . INATTENTION TV M 9WvG SAftE QIR. 0 0 1 T 0 m 1435 SOUTH >LL m-INGT01! : 0.45: 4/ , $1". . 1600.- CLID DY FOLLOWING. TOO CLIDSE REAR END COLLISLON 0 O 1 4 0 N 2351 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.45 Olns/96 1100 CLEAR OTHER ape CAUSE TURNIMG-SAME DIR. 0 0 1 4 0 S I,2511 SOUTH ". SURLINGTfm 0.45 3/11/93 1TOO CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TU KVfG-{MPPv DIR. 0 0 2 4 0 E 3555 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.45 1.1/23/95 900. CLEAR. IMPROPER TURN TVKNIHG-�OPPw OIR. 0 0 1 4 0 N 3"1 SO MI OLURUXGTOH 0.51 9/12/% 1600 CLEAR . IHATTEMTI0 4; PEAR END COLLISIOM 1 0 1 4 O N Z164: SOUTH.f"ALINGTOM 0.51 5/Z0/92 .1590 - :CLEAR fULLOW103, TOO.CLOSE REA[R,8W. COLLISION 1 0 L 4 0 N 49Tf? ".SOfU7N ;00RLIMATON A.53.:. iZ/JR/FTt:_Z009:-- CtJOURT..... __INATTENTION1_ _ _ _ - UREAUR._END, COLLISION 0 0 - 1• 4 0 N T80. SOM, BURLINGTON 0.53 1/-3195 3.500 CLEAR FOLLOWING TW CLOSE • REAR•EX9:COW3IQN 0 0 1 4 0 O U36 SQLlt l': WRL I1lHiT07f0 0.53 3/ ` 9/96 1600 CLOUDY- FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR 800 COLLISION 3 0 1 +i 0 S 3210 Sam 0.53 T/I7/92 1690 ; CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW HIT.BICYCLIST 1 0 1 2101' _BURt,IMGTON Sf r#i XURLINf tom 0.53 .7%2y/! U00•; " RAIN SLIPPERY ROAD FEAR 10 0: COOL.LISIOM 1 0 4 # 0 IL 80aa • SwTH . WALINGTON 0.53 11/ . 7/9'b L 900-: AkAXN FOLLOWING -TOO CLOSE REAR tE tC'OLLASION 1 0 4 zw �SOUiH sQRmGTON 0.53_ 5/ _f3/90b,: -. 6 .1t!l�11 _ . --1IRti0lt� GYTI�TED--- " ..REA%_-END-CgLUSIOM 3 0 1 4 #1 S T'08 SOUTH SURLIMG10" 0.53 3/20/93 9" CLJ3UW FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 4 4 O S '.DOra SUM. 0.53. • 1/ 4/93 T00 CL,OWT INATTEIOT om REAR END COLLISION 0 0 a 4 0 E 4 39 `TitRRH aJlttA4iiTOM - 0.53 _ 101 61" . TOO._ : CLOUl" INATTENTION T►JRMING-SAME- DIR+ 0 0 1 4 O M 5079 wam BURC:IHGTom 0*53 12/27/93 ISM CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOD,SE NEAR.END"COLUSZAf'f 0 A 1 4 0 u 1090. SCRdTit fDUW."41ON 0.93 2128192 -700 -CLEAR FOCtt ZIM TOO CLOE REAR END COL. sioN 0 0 I 4 0 11 3193 SOUTH SURUNGTON 9.53 8/• 9r9 -1200 CLEAR ER?CESSIVE'SPEED REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 N 2479- SOUTH witumsto I 0.58 8/141" IWO CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW READ ON COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 E 1528 SOUTH ,BURUNGTON 0.61 2/2919Z 1300 ELM OT FOLLOWING TW CLOSE REAR END COLLISION Q 0 1 4 0 S 2265 'SOUTH BUALIMGTON 0.61 4/26/95 1600 CLEAR OTHER OP. CAUSE ' RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE Q 0 1 4 0 S 1522 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.61 3/24/93 1700, OTHER/UNOC )FOLLOWING TOE] CLOSE REAR END COLLISION c 0 1 4 0 S 2T*32 sOUTH. sURLINGT9N 0.62 1/17/" 130?0 . CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION I 0 1 4 0 5 1847 SOUTH, BURLINGTON 0.63 5/16/94 1200 RAI" INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 2136 SOUTH BWUJNGTON 0.69 IWZ&/94 MM RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION l 0 1 4 0 g 1621 SOUTH` ODURLINGTON 0.69 4/29/94 15W CLEAR FOL tONIMG TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLSSION 0 0 1 4 O S 2706 SOUTH,BURLINGTOM 0969 V25194 1400 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 37TS SOUTH BURLIMGTOH 0.6,0 10/ if/94 2000 CLEAR INATTENTION SIDESMIPE-SAME DIR. 0 0 1 4 O S 4S1 . SOM OWL:InGTON O.b9 1/14/94 8001 S"uw FAILURE ' TO YIELD ROW TURNING-OPP. DIR. 0 d 1 4 q E 4TT2 SSIUTH ,8URUNGTON 0.69 12/aO1" _-."O10 CLOUDY. FOLLOWING.=T00 CLOSE ' REAR OEfW -COLLISION 0 0 1 4 O S zu.1 SOUTH BUAL-watch 0.69 7/-31" 1700 CLOUDY IMPROPER PASSING "EAU ON COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 E 4858 SOUTH DMAU.IONGTAN 0.69 11/17f9Z 1700 SHOW LIQUOR' CITATED RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 0 S 3691 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.69 s/23/9Z 1T" .CLOUDY IMPROPER TURN RTo ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 q H 2198 . SOUTH . 03URL:INGTO N o.69 7/21/93 " 1.ZOO CLEAR OP - POOR" JUDGEMENT " RT. ANGI.LL-BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 O S 1639 SQUTf! AURLIMFTOM Q•69 4128/95 INO CLE,M FAILURE TO YIELD ROW HEAD tR ".CULLISIONN 1 0 1 4 0 S 26L031 SOUTH allRLINGIO" 0.69 6/29/93 LMO • CL.EAit FAILURE TO YIELD ftON. RTi-AMGt"KOAOS]:DE 1 q 1 4 p E 21ZO SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.73 5/16/92 1600 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIGN VIOL HEAD ON COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O N +� TNl$ ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGI WAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS OATA'SNOULD HOT BE USED IN AM ANALYSIS WITH OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAPS LOCATION- VERMNT AGENCY Of TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHMAY SORTED'ACCtUENT FILE 4PROGRAFI NO. 10751 YEARS OF DATA 92 93.94 95 96, WAGE 156 RUN DATE 02/12/96 ROUTE: US-7 SEQUEHGE N09 OF SKID SIPS NUMBER: Tu.w_ . MILEAGE NM/DD/VY TIME WEATHER• iCAUSE,OF,ACCUNT- TWE.OF ACCIDENT; IN.D FAT CODE NO. 2Z47 SOUTH RUItLIWDG O•T5 S/18/92 a00 GAUDY - FAILURO-TO YIELD &W OT'NER COLLISION 2 0 1 4 2189 SOUTH RLWI INGTON 0.75 5/21/92 1300 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO'CLOSE REAR END COLL ISIOH 0 0 1 4 53o SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.75 IM/93 2100 CLOUDY FOLLUVIHG Teo CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 1 0 2 4 437 .SOUTH AURLINGTON -0.75 1/119193 BOO . SPION EXCESSIVE SPEED TURNING -SANE DIR. 0 0 . 3 4 1956. SO _BURLINGTON 0075 5124194 1Z00: CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TURNING-WP• DIa. Z 0 1 4- 2531 SOUTH BURLINGTON GUTS. 5/28/94 1907E 'RAN FAILURE TO YIELD -ROW -HEAD ON'COLLISION 0 0 1 -5 2418 SOUTH BURLINGTON - 0.76 6/ 5/9Z 14.00 CLOUDY FAILURE TO VIEL V , RC7W RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 Y. 4 Tr19Z SOUTH. BURLINGTON 0•?7 12130/92 1400 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD R0 4 TURNING-OPP• DIR. 0 0 X AF 2+I24 SOUTH WRL.INGIOII Oon 5/T..2/93 1290 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 3444 SOUTH GURLINGTON D.77. 11/ 9/9'5 1T00 CLEAR FAILURE. TO YIELD ROW Rt. AM E--ROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 348? . SaDTH BURLT;NGTt 0.+81 9/ ° 3/93 1200 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROMP TURNING-Wo, DIRe 0 01 1 4 2880 SQU1t1_1611dN0MGTOM_ 0.8x 1/1F/�SP3 -1aW1__CIBAft_ - FAILQRE.TO_YIEi.D.RQbd_RY. ANGLE-�RO�DSEDE 0 0 1 4 1621 SOUTH-BURLINGTON Gin 3/24195 1700 CLOMY FAILURE TO YIELD ROM HEAD ON COLLISION. 0 0 1 4 U*a SOUTH, WRLINGTON 0.61 3/2Z/96. 600 CLEAR DRIVER FELL ASLEEP REAR ERD:COLLISION 2 0 1 4 2305 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.81 6/201" 2100 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR 8W- COLLISION - 0 0 1 4 +4113 SOUTH BURLING TOM O«81 10/19/9Z 1+F9i1 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD ROW REAR END -.COLLISION. 0 0 4 4 438 .SOUTH.BVRLINR.TO19 044 1/'9/94 1"0 CLOUDY EXCESSIVE SPEED . Tumffg--WPr -DIR+ 0. 0 3 4 T11 : SOUTH' BYRL WON _. - %86 _ ._1! : �(94 __24Q0 : tLW _ _ SttPKRT ROM ---- - -- _REAR ;.EN 'C8L�ISSOM� 1 0 0 4 576 SOUTH 61plLltlFr QdA (7:R7 i/25/94. 1500 Cte[MDY FAILADRE TO YIELD R[RW RT• ANGtrE-BROADSIDE - q 0 i 4 2.962 SOWN .-BURL.INGTONI 0mST _ 11/20/94 1600 CLOG' FULLO"ING TOO CLOSE - REAR END COLLISION I O 0 1 4 1942 SOUTN`3URLING7.ON. - 0•87' W19 4 1400 _ CLJ9AR LIQWMf `.ITATED REAR -END, COLLISION 13" - SOUTH maL fofll . _. oat 4na/04 900 CLEAR FOL*.Owxm6 -YOU CLOSE REAR :Fjw ,cOLLKSION'N 0 0 . 1 4 1668 -5=8 GURLOGYM 0497 2/18/9+F 1390 CLOWT FOLLOWIH6 YOU CLOSE REAR E11D COLUSIQV x 4 0 2 4 21T1 SOUTH , WRL•INGION 0.67 4/ 4/94 1690 CLEAR FAILURE. TA YIELD Pow RT. ANGLE--dROAOSIDE- 0 O 1 4 4!19 SOUTH 8URLINGTaN Don 1/11193 1100 SNOW INPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE4KOADSIDE= 0 0 1 4 435.3 SOUTH BURLINCTON 0•BT. 10/ZI/94 2000 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIGH VIOL RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE- 3 0 1 4 4686 SOUTH AMLINGYON 0•o7 10/30/93 2100 CL43VUY INATTENTION REAR lEND COLLISION \ 1 0 1 4 2950 SOUTH DURL.INGTON 0.87 7/20193 MO CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIBN VIOL RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE•_ 0 0 1 4 39T5 SOUTH .4UWNGTM 0.67 lo/ 1193 1200 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSe REAR END.COLLISION \ 1 0 1 4 5089 SOUTH OURLINGTO" 0.67 -12/Z3/" 1790 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW yURfUMG-OPP+ DIRe v' O 0 1 4 `306T 3011 V BURLINGTON 0.87 7/ -7/93 iTOD CLEAR FOLL.OWIN6 TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION \ 6 O _I 4 3909 SOUTH-BURLINGfUN 0.87. 10/ 4/93 900 CLOUDY FAIL.AIRE TO YIELD ROW TDRNINQr-SAME DIR. U 0 0 2 4 325E SOUTH' MURLINGTO@I 0,087 T/2Z/93 2600 OTHER/U"K FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION ` 1 0 1 4 3905 SOUTH $WtLINGlrUN 0.87 10/ 2/93 1600 RAIN- 111PROPER TURN TURNIWr-OPP* DIR• 0 0 0 1 4 a" .. SOUTH ALNUMICTON 0.87 V1.3192 2200 CLEAR FAILURE . TO YIELD ROM . RT: ANSE-BROADS IDE- 0 O .1 4 43T4 SOUTH BURLMIM 0.87 10/29192 1T00. CLAY FOLLONING TOO CLOSE REAR END lCOL. ISION \ 2 0 1 4 3248 SOU'Y•H BURLTDWON 0.37 MT. s/ 4/92 2060 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW. RTm ANGLE• -BROADSIDE- 6. O 1 4 817 DW SOUTH RLINGTa1 2/22/95 1400 CLUIIDY STUD.LIGHT/SIGN VIOL RT- ANGLE: -BROADSIDE- 0 0 1 4 2.L16 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.07 5/15/9'Z 1300 ClAWY FOILLOIIING TOO CLOSE BEAR END' (COLLISION ` O 0 1 4 442 SOUTH . BURLINGTON, . 04.E-7 1J2'<1/'95 . 1400 RAlw - INATTENTIM TID kilot-oPPe . DER.0 O 0 1 4 774 suall BURL:INGTON - 0.87 . 3/ 0/95 1300 RAW . FAILURE TO YIELO ROW aTM : COt.LISIa1 - 0 0 1 48'l1 SOUTH BUKLINGTON 0087 12/ 7192 1100. CLOUDY. FULLOVING TOO CLOSE RIEAR -END caL.LISIaN\ 1 0 1 4 2395 SOUTH HA RL.INGI OII 0.87 9/29/95 1300 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COLLISIaN ` 2 0 D. 4 s THIS ACCIDENT., OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT rROJECT. THIS DATA 5"0SALia ROT RE USED IM AN ANALYSIS WITH OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION. CLAS. ~ CODE D1 IW O E O S o S 0 S Q N 0 E 0 E 0 S 0 E O E 0 E Q E O N 0 N 0 S O S 0 tl 0 N 0 E 0 S 0 s a s 0 S 0 E O N 0 E O N O E 0 S 0 M 0 S O S O S O E O H O S O E q 5 0 S 0 11 0 E 0 S O y VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE I57 0 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN DATE OZIIZ/9'IB WtUgRAN NO. 0575) �� H YEARS OF ,DATA 92 93 94 95. 96 °�' _ . ROUTE: 05-7 m °e $EAUENC6 "Go OF SKID SYS CLAS. RUN" TOWN • PUL,EAAGE:Mfllgl? XYY TINE WEATHER CLOSE ilF, ACCIOEHT , TYPE .OF ACCIO ENT IN,! FAT COOS NO* CODE t!i 36TI SOi1TH BULRA.INGlam 0.81 9/10/92 2100 RAIN EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR END COLL.ISION� 2 0 4 4 0 S °o 1235 SOUTH SURLINGTQN 0087 2/22/93 1700 ct"T HIT C RUN VEHICLE REAR -END COLLISIONS 3 0 1 4 0 S t065 .SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.8T 4/24192 1400 CLOUDY FAILURE TQ YIELD RAH;OTHER COLLISION. 0 0 1 4 O A +135 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.87 10/13/92 1600 CLOUDY STOP LIGHT/SIC" VIOL RT. AMPLE -BROADSIDE- 0 0 -4 4 0 S 2.053 5UutH:9URLINGTUh 0.87 6/22/'95 600 QTf4ERfUnK FAILURE TO YIELD ROM OTHER, COLISIOH 1 0 1 4 0 S C � 4103 SOUTH- BURLINGTON O.BT- 10/.3/42 800 CL.EAM IMAITENTIOII --- __-------REAR ND ECOLUSIOM � 0 0 1 4 0 o N 1595 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.87 4/ 3192 251DO CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. A"6LE-BROADSIDE= 0 0 1 4 0 _.N - E 3874 SOUTH 3UTALINGfON 0.8T. 9/26/92 1®(�0 RAIN FAIL6lPlE TO YIELD ROW 7!!R"IN6�QPP. QIR. v 1 0 1 4 0 N ro C 1625 SOUTH BURLINGTON 0.87 5/231" 1600 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR E14D COLLISION 0 1 4 0 S � 1400 SOUTH BURLIfAatm 0.81. 4/ 6/92 1300 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD , RAM TWNIIIG=-Mr. OIR. 0 z 0 1 4 0 Iy co 2644 SUM - BUltLINGTON 0.1l7 . . 7/ '2/92 1200 CLEAR FOLLONING TOO CLOSE ,REAR .END COLLISION � 2 0 1 4 0 N cl w 15.12 SWTH . W*L.INGTUN - _0•00 -3/ 2M. -].2L00__ CLEAR FOLLOWING, TOQ CLOSE. -REAR ETID. CAt.LISIflM 0 0_ _4 4 0 S 313JL SOUTH.BURLINGtOM 0.93 10/11/95 JIM CLEAR INATTENTION REAM-EW CQLL.ISION4 1 0 1 - 4 - _ 0 S 161Z SOUTH StALINGTCMW 0.94 3/30/93 1300 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TTW CLOSE m ,m COLLISION 1 0 a 4 0 S t. 2316 SOUTH BUMJNrptM 0.14.- - 4/ _4/9S _ 1300 CLEAR- FOLUNING TOO, CLOSE .. REAR. €W COLLISION 1 0 I 4 0 S 34ZT SOUTH .Bt1RLIXQlQN 0a94 W0122"2 3190,.- CLEAR' lcAnute To. YIELD'ItOW Ot11ER'-CO'LLISIAN 0. 0 1 4 0 W 4363 . SOUTH -GURL.UOTI N 0.97 10/ B CLOUDY. FAILU*e. TQ Ylrzt ,ROH -RT,* ,A tGLlE-GROiAOSIQaE 1 v- 1 �i 0 g 0>ITt! _ T _ . _ _ _.04` .. i-41_ � 1F L:fiiettlG _T �CILg _-R 11R�-f ta _CtILLig� 0 0 1 4 0 .s 322 SOUTH AUVAJNGION 1(604 1/ -3/95 100 CLEAR OTHL1t 010. CAUSE URNENG-SAME-DER.. 1 0 1 - it 0 S 3230 :. 50UTf BURL.INGTOH l•O4 I%/ 6/.95 1700 CLEAR INATTENTIQtj REAR .END COLLISION 1 0 1 4- 0 N � c 2 2-.•_S0([T�1'.BttIt1�I!lGTOWW I:06..--- L .. 2100 - CLOUDY CARELESS TEQESMIAN.. HIT.PED£STRIAT4. I 0 1 4 Q 3 13.20 SOOT BURL.INGION 1.06, 3/31/94 700 . OTHEfttum f SLIPmIty ROAD OTHER "COLLISION 1 0 - 3 4 0 S 5".f6 . Sam sBuRL. mstaN 1•06 1/2l/" SW CLEAR FAILURE TO � YIELD 1tOW: TWXIM"AME OIR4 0 0 1 4 0 625 SXWTH BURL RGION ImO6. 1122M . 1100 RAI" FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT• :Al1GLE-6ROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 0 E �Z 1913 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.01 S/2I:/96 3200 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. AMGLE-BROAOSIM 3 0 1 ti 9 S U 1310 SOUTH BOALINGTOW 1.07 4/23/96 1300 RAIN BACKING IN . ROADWAY BACKED INTO VEHICLE 1 0 1 4 0 169z SOUTH BURLINGTON. 1.1x 5/31195 Vito CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD, Roo HEAQ ON COLLISION IMPROPER 1 0 1 ! 0 N � 307 SOUTH BURLINGTON lal2 1/ 1/92 IWO CLEAR TURN RT..ANGLE-3ROADSIOE 2 ® 1 4 0 N 955 SOUTH . BURLINGTON 1.13 2/19192 1000 OTHER./UKK IMPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE --BROADSIDE 1 0 4 4 0 S C 3127 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.13 G/ 4/93 2700 RAIN u POOR JUDGEMENT_ -UTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 - S 3603 SOUTH 9vRLIMf9)N 1.13 9/ 7/lp3 1400 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD -ROW OUER COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 3360 . SOUTH BURLINQwYON 1.13 Of'Z0193 1900 RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 g N 1105 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.3.3 Z/29/92 800 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW. TUAKIMp-Ott• DIR. 0. O I 3128. SOUTH Jl;URL..I"GTON 1.13 B/ 5/93 1500 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELDdR011W HEAD to .CML.I$wm 0 0 1 4 0 1U 9015 SOUTH BURLINGTON' 1.13 XUAI M;I 1100 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIC"•VIOL HEAD ON COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 - S C. 361 SOUTH BURLlffGtON 1.23 - 11AIM . _17_00 _CLOUDY FOLLOWIN TOO _CLM REAM.-Ew.COL.LISIOM 0 0 1 4 0 S 2741 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.13 10/&U" 2400 CLOWT FAILURE TO YIELD ROW_RT• ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 _ 0 m 1232 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.13 3/2?196 1300 CL.OVIDY DRIVER FELL ASLEEP REAR ENO COLLISION 3 0 1 4 0 S 304i. SOUTH BURLINGTON 1413 9/ .2/94 .3.200 CLEM FOLLOWING TOQ_CLOSE REAR EtEQ rMj_ZSIUMt 0 0 1 4 0 S 061 SOLWTH: BUa""Gym 2423. 3/30/" 2Z00 RAIN • CARELESS -PMSTRIAH - _HIT PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 4 0 M 27+31 SfJtOTH .BINLLINGTON 1.13 10/10/96. 1209 M1N - IAPRO!°ER TURN RTs;:AT/Gl."RQ0SRQE 0 0 1 4 0 20,% SOUTH WRLIL46TOLW 1.13_ .3/2�i/�4. 100tJ; CLOItO$ OTUiER'VEHICLES -- - TUtlt/1it11G-SAfIE Dlit. 0 0 1 4 0 S Z"S SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.13 7/ 5/94 600 OTMR/UNR.STOP LIGHT/.SIGN VlOL,HEAP W COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S TtWIS ACCIOEWr,OCCUakftO.PRIUR-TO THE LAST HIGHIMAr IPWPROVEMENT PRUJECT. TIIX$ DATA SHOULD NOT BE USED IN AN ANALIrSIS WITH EITHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION. c :c Ic VERrANT AGENCY OF YRANSPORTATIOH PAGE 150 STATE HIGHLIAV SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN DATE QZ/1.t/9'9 (PROGRAM'M a H5TS) YEARS OF DATA 9Z 93 94 95 96 ROUTE: US-T SEQUENCE NO- OF SKID SYS CLA•5. PIUNSi=R- . • , ;; MILEALoE- 11 UWIYI' TIME WE;ATNER . CAUSE :OV ACCIDE"Y TINE AW; ACCIDENT` tNJ FAT- CODE NO. CODE 01 4088 Skim MHrRUMTOM 1.43 11 18194 1300 CLEAR FAILURE To YIELD IWO RT. 11N616-BROASSIDE 1 0 1 4 O iM 3260 SOUTH . BURL-INGTON 1.13 ILWZT/95 2300 CLEAR INATTENTION RT. ANGLE --BROADSIDE o O 4 4 0 d9 4:224 SOUTH-BURLINGiTOM 1.15 10/ZT/93 Z290 RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 21 4 Q S 12VI SOUTH BLNLI.INGTON 1.17 3/14193. 16W SNOV BACKING INTO RQADMAY UMNLN6-SAME DIR. 0 0 3 4 O. E 762 . SOLIitI . LSU RUNGTON 2019 2/ 7/92 2100 " CLEAR FOLL LINING TOO CLOSE REAR ' EIID COLUSION 0 0 1 4 0 5 2004 SOUTH rBURUfffiTUM 1.19 6/ZT/9S 900- CLEAR FAMME ' TA' YIELD ROW RTw' AIIGLE-6ROADSIDE 2 0 1 4 O E 3440" SOUTH BUALINGTm 1..20 91301% 1400 CLDLdDY FAILURE TO TiEn-o ROM SlOkSYIPE-SAME DIR. a O 1 4 0 t! '2131 SOUTH BURLZM6tM( 1•S0 4/ 0/94 2500 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROM RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 0 M 2420 SWJTH BUIRL.INGTON I.Z3 5/111" 140.0 CLEAR FULLUMI046 TOO CLOSE REAR EILO COLLISIOM 1 0 1 4 0 N 1336 _sWt.4 SURL.INGTO►L 1.24 41-1/44 UQQ CLOUDY stop LIGHT/SIGN i10L HEAD ON, COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 E 3476. SOUTH BURLI(!IGT.Oti 1.24 8/'8/94 9E300. CLEAR INATTENTION REAR'Emo .COLLISION 0 0 1 4 D M 2{i4L SQU:iI.E T 1.24 6l23f9Z 1600 CLEAR CARELESS" & "l GLIGENT;OTHIFlL 9MAJSJE0N ' _ 2 0 1 4 0 S 4asi SO"SURLINMTDM UTH 1.24. 10/16/92 3100. •NAlk FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REJ QR &O'-CMUSION O 0 4 4 a N ik4T SOUTH AURLINGTOM 1.24 9/22f" 1700 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD ROM UTIIlE#1 C%LISIOII , L O 1 4 O N 696, SOUTH DUALING-M 1.24 - 2/161" 1620 CLEAR " INATTENTION REAR • E1:A C[ AJ31 ON 2 0 1 4 0 PI -348t. 'SOUTH SURLIIlGTON 1.94 d/21/92 1.100 OTOMfUNK FAILURE: TO YIELD ROW -WAD ON COLLISXCM 1 o L 4 0 N SjLl'Z SOUTH. SURLI14GI'QPL I..24 IV14192 1"0 CLOUDY FOLLUTAUG- TOO CLOSE., REAS -E"D COls1;ISIGN 1 0 1 4 0 d 332 , '-SOUTH SUAtLIIIGitJ(I .- 1+24. , 1/ ?T' " 1TWl _: CLOUDY - ,If9Mtd�EIE__TlE1RlM _ .`_ : _ .,IL�e'. ANGLE -BROADSIDE" 9 0 1 4 0 S 4575 SOUTH EEIHRL:Iiwit d I.Z4 3d�/29/'93 1700 CLEAR FAiLUAE TO YIELD. Uk itAb am L'OLLISIDN 0 0 1 4 0 E To- ,SOL(TH-GML1NItw 1.24 zt, 6/12 - Igo CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO +CLOSE REAR.•SM COLLISION 0 0 1 4 O S 34T3 SOUTH BUTLL.UM6Eit10M 1.Z4 9/%1193. 1WO ' CLIMY- INATTENTION REAR•HEMEI•EOLUSION 1 0 1 4 o s 3H1S7t . SOUTH IWRLIMI:TON 1.Z4 17.11U" 1900. CLEAR INATTENTION HEAD ON COLLISIOW z 0 1 4 0 S 964 :.SOUTH BURLINGTON _ 1.2s 1126/92 1600 CLOUDY Fo L:OMING" TAO Ccom REAR . EMO -COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 429 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.29 2/17193 200 CLEAR L.I®UORy .CITATEO HIT°PEOESTRIAM . I 0 1 4 0 S 1111 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.31 31 2193 1800 SHOW FAILURE TO YIELD RUM TURNING -SANE VIA. 0 0 1 4 0 E 7552 .SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.31 4/16/93 1400 CLEAR 4INKNOM REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 4134 SOUTH BURLIM6TON 1.34 91ZZ/93 900 CLEAR OTHER VEH. FAULT ROLLED OWE% ON LEFT 1 0 1 4 Q s S52 SOUTH.SURLINGTOH 1.35 1/19/94 ' 1000 CLOUDY CAREL.L;SS'&.NEGL.IGENT HEAD ON COLLISION 1 O 4 4 0 S 411.b SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.35 10/Z1/92 2000 CLEAR IMPRGFER TARN TURNING -SAME DIR. 0 O 1 eR p M 4197 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.35 10/ 1/4+Z 1700. CLEAR DEFECTIVE BRAKES REAR LEND COLLISION O O 1 4 0• N 2459 SOUTH-SURLINGTOH 1.35 6/l3/9Z 1SQO CLEAR FOLLOWING Too CLOSE REAR END COLLISION A O 2 4 0 S 4359 SOUTH BURL.INGTON 1.39 lo/X4/94 1600 CLEAR INATTENTIONI REAR -END COLLISION 1 0 0 4 0 S 6TZ SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.40 x/ 3/% 2100 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROM RT. ANGLE-,SROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 0 E 36" SOUTH SUAL18GION 1.43 10/18/94 1300 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROM RT. A"6tE-9RQAD`SIIBE Z O 1 4 0 I/ 3?50 SOUTH ,BURL.I1MiTON 1.43 IG/ 6194 2100 CLOUDY IMERPERIENCED DRIVER HEAD ON COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 M 2535 SOUTH BORLINSTON 1.43. S/Z7194 1700 CLEAR FAILURE:TO YIELD ROW OTHER COLLISION: 6 0 1 4 O k a-r* SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.43 k/13/92 11i80 CLOvor " a=AILLHNRE T® YIELD IROM RT. AlWA-dROADSIDE a' O 1 4 0 N _ 4881 SOUTH SURL',INGTON 1.43 22130/93 2100 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 4389 SOUTH AUPIJNGVM 1.43 13/10193 1400 CLOWT FAILURE TO YIELD ROM BEAD ON COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 W 3Z7T SOUTH . 84MLIMMUN 1.43 W16193 1509 CLEAR vuLL.OMING- Too CITE RO AR END COLL TSION 0 0 1 R 0 N 2115 $out" BURLIH!LGTON 1.43 T/ 9196 2200 RAIM EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR " END COLLISIOM 4 O 1 4 a S 3ras SOUTH $Uftll84iTOII 1.48 9/ 819Z 1300 CL.EAM FOLLOWING 'TOO CLOSE REAR ENv COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 H 1513 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.43 5/11195 1200 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD ROW !HEAD OIL COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O S + THIS ACCIDENT -OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY I"PROVERENt PROJECT. THUS DATA SMOUL.D PUT BE USED IN AN ANALYSIS WITH OTHER ACCIOEHTS AT THE SAME LOCATION. VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 159 STATE NISHMAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN DATE 02/12fg8 (PROGRAM MO* INSTS) YEARS OF DATA 9Z 9$ 9f6.95 96 ROUTES US-7 SEQUENCE NUMBER TOWN. MILEAGE MM/DD/YY ,TIME YEATHER CAUSE OF ACCIDENT. TYPE:OF ACCIDENT- M0. INJ OF FAT SKID CODE SYS NO. CL.AS. CODE 01 2553 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.43` 8/22/95 2400 CLOWY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR.EID COLLISION 0 0 1 M 2470 SOUTH OURLINGYGN 1.43 5/26/92 1200 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TURM049-SAME ,DIR. 1- O 1 4 0 S 1270 SOUIH.OURLINGTOM 1.44 Z/11/93 '1:100 CLEAR INATTENTION TURNIN9-SAME DIR. 0 0 1 4 0 S 3276 .SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.44 9/-8/94 2690 CLEAR IMA1TTENTIOM REAR END COLLISIONL 1 0 1 4 ® 14 4774 SOUTH SURLINGTON 1.45 12/11/94 2600 CLIDDY OTHER are CAUSE SIDESWIPE -SAME DIR. 1 O 1 O N 3572 Sam BURLINGTON 1.45 12/ 6/95 2100 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. AWLE-BROADSIDE 2 0 1 4 0 1f 1432 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.48 3/22/93 1400 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROM HEAD ON COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O S 837 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.48 Z/12/93 1600 SNOW INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 1 0 3 4 O H 2437 SLAUTH BURLINGTON 1.48 5/19/94 1600. CLEAR FOLLOWIIIC TOO CLOSE REAR EM COLL.ISION 2 0 1 4 0 H 2964 SOUTH BURLENGTOR9 1.48 4/29m 3400 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW.RTo ANCLE-BROADStOE I v ). 4 0 bl Imm, SOUTH.BURLINGTON 1.48 5/ 9194 2200 CLEAR FAILURE, TO YIELD RAN SIDESWI/'E'`SAME DIR.. 0 0 1 4 0 M 2943 SL7S7TH DURLIM6TON 1.48 . 6/ 3f93 _1200 _ CLEAR FAILURE TO YIEO ROM RT.' ARGLI-BROADSIDE 2 0- 1 4 0 M Z795 SOUTH OUIRLINGTC" 1*40 9/12195 600 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW -HEAD ON COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O . W 1691 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1448 4/ZZ/9Z ZO00 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD ROM TURNIMTr-SAME DIR. 2 0 1 4 O E .2935 SL)UTH BIURLINGTON 1,0413 1/18/9Z "" CLEAR FAWME TO YIELD NOW OTHER'COLLISION 1 9 1 4 0 M 4062 SOUTH•SURL.INGTON 1*48 10/12/92 1300 CLOUDY INATTENTION REAR ENO COLLISIOIN• O D 1 4 O S 444, SL) 9 BURLINGTON 1.48 1/?3/95 - 1400 CLuwY FAILURE TO YIELD ROLL RTe ' ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 4 4 0 v 33$4 SWIN • 1URLAM TON 149 B/ZIM- _2100 _CLEAR - FAILURE TO YNt_9 7 NOW -OTHER _COLLISION 0 0 . L 4 0 H 2903 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.49 7117/93 1Z00 LITTLER/UNK FAILURE TO YIELD ROM TURNING-OPp. DIR• 0 0 1 4 O U 322 SOUTH BURL.INGTION 1.50 1/ 4M 900 CLOU9Y FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 O N 38,20 _SOUTH :OLIRLIOGTOM 1.51 9/ _V94 '_-100_.-CLEAR- FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 O 1 4 O N 1-14Z SamDUpLLTNGTOH 1;92 9/,A/94. 11.00 QTHER/UMK IMPROPER TURN TUR}4INl:+-BAML"s DIR• 0 0 1 4 0 E 396, SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 II12/94 . LIOo CLOUDY CARELESS t NEGLIGENT LOANING-ZAflEDIR. 0 0 3 4 0 M 356 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 1/ 7/94 1700 SNOW EXtES31YE SPEED REAR ENO COLLISION 1 0 3 4 O M 20" SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 4/10143 1400 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 0 M 3160 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 9/ 1194 1100 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIGN VIOL RT• ANGLE --BROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 O 1t `891 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 2/26/93 1500 SNOW OP. POOR JUDGEMENT OTHER COLLISION 4 0 1 4 0 „ 394. SOUTH .BURLINGTON 1.52 if 9/93 1900 CLEAR IMATTEMTIOM REAR END COLLISION. 2 0 1 4 O N 3327- SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 7/27/93 1500 RAIN INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 2920 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 6//.28/93 2900 CLEAR CARELESS BICYCLIST NIT BICYCLIST 1 0 1 4 0 N 2361 SOUTH-BURLINGTON 1.52 S/ 8/95 1300 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW:NEAD ON COLLISION 2 0 1 4 O N 16-10 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1*52 T/ 5/96 1900 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD RON TURNING-Wro DIR. 0 0 1 4 0 w 1375 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 4/29/95 1300 CLLMY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE 'REAR END COLLISION 2 O 1 4 O S 2155 SOUTH, "LINGTON 1.52 7/31/96 2300 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION, I 0 1 4 0 N 2167. SOUTH BURLIi1GTG" 1*52 9/72/95 1300. CLEAR INATTENTION REAR -END COLLISIONI O O 1 4 0 S 1943 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.52 6IW96 2200 RAIN FOLONIN6 TOO _CLOSE . REAR 00 COLLISION 0 0 4 4 0 S 1793 SOUTH BU/IRL:INGfUM 1.52 6/ 6/95 2200- CLOUDY FOLLOWIR+G TdO CLOSE REAR:END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 1978 SOUTH MLNU INSION 1.52 S/ 6192 1400 CLEAR FOLLOMING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 11- 306Ua SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.53 _ 9/Z9/95 1000 - CLOUDY FOL.L.aOMIN9 TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 N 1]L23- SOUTH_BUIRLIIIGTON 1.54 2/29/92. 1'100 Ct®UOY FAILURE TO YIELD ROM TURMIM-'SAME DIR. 0 0 l 4 0 11 2931 SOUTH:BURLXNGTON 1.94 5/15/94 "40 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION Z 0 1 4 0 S 3853 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.55 11/ 5/94 1T00 RAIN miLL.OMING TOQ CLUSI REAR ENO COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 M 2UI19 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1057 7/ 7/93' 1600 CLEAR INATTENTIOH REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 N THIS ACCIDENT. OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PRUJECT. THIS DATA SHOMD PLOT BE USED IN All ANALYSIS WITH OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION* VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 160 0 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN OA1E 02flZ/98 � (PROGRAM N0. H575) r YEARS OF DATA 9Z 93 94 95 96 a' cc 00 ROUTES US-7 SEQUENCE NO. OF SKIP SYS CLAS. ~ NUMBER TOWN- MILEAGE RN/BPYY TINE WEATHER CAUSE .OF: AtyCIl1EPTT- TTME,'.0F'•AEC>Gt1ENT. [NJ FAT CODE no.. CODE Dl t w 2 4 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.$9 8J 1/95 1390 CLEAR FOLLOWINI►'ipO-CLOSE REAR END COLLISIIMN 2 O t 4 B N ~ 1960 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.59 4115/92 1400 CLEAR CARELESS t NEGLIGENT REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O S 4335 SOUTH GURAJMGTON 1.63 20/31/92 2400, CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD RON RT- ANGLE -BROADSIDE O o 1 4 O M 4TT4 SOUTH'81NRLIMGTON 1.63 12/-5192 1300 CLOUDY, FOLUNdIR6 TW CLOSE REAR E"D COLLISION O 0 0 4 0 S 35T SOUTN.st*L.IlNGTON 1.63 1/`8195 1060- CLEAR INATTENTION, REAR END COLLISION 0 0 2 4 0 N F o 603 SOUTH BUfRLINGFON! 2.63. 1/22193 -3500 CLOUDY- FOLLONNIIlgjOO-CLOSE . REAR ENO -COLLISION 2 0 1 4 O N ry 734 SOUTH 8URLINGTON 1.63 2/ 6193 Z309 CLEAR IMPROPER TURN TURNING-OPP► DIR. O 0 1 4 O NN rev 464 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1"3 1/15/93 2790 SNOW FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION a a 1 4 0 N t w 1058 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.63 1/30193 1"0. SNOW FOLWNI146 TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION. 1 4 1 4 0 N 4611 SOUTH BURLIN6TON 1*64 11/21/92 2300 RAIN, EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR ENO NULA4SION o 0 4 4 O N °' IOTA , SOUTH, BURLINGTON 1.64 CLOUDY - E.NLCEMVE SPEED REAR � END COLLISION O Q 3 4 0 N t � . 9124, SCUTNN _ BURLINGTON _ li6s 3LU30192 _ 900 -, CLOUDY' . _- EXCESSIVE _SMED HE, AQ A;OL1LISION 0' 0 ]1 4. U E 3�4" -SOUTH stmufarm Lis 6/ im 1600 - RAIN/ FU1 LowiN6 • irou GLQSE REAR AID . cauxSii 1 O 4 4 O S 28b'b SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.65 T/1T/9Z 1390 . CLEAR t NATTENTIODI REAR-NDND COLLISION 1 O 1 4 0 S i 39TY SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.65 10/ :8/92 . 1000, CLEAR- STOP LIGHT/SX607 VIQA. OTHER ,_COLLISION 1 0. 1 4 0 14 458 STEM BURLINGTON 1.66 11 0192t 1300 SWUM FOLLOWING TOT] CLOSE REAR f" CMUSION O 0 3 4 o S 3167 : SOUTl1.OWLINGWON 1.69 e/ZT193 1200 . CLEAR INATTENTION REAR 1E NQ• OOA LUJON- 2- 0 1 4 0 � 3%5 "SWtH _BURU NGTON I.69 8131193_ _.LOAD;_ CLOUDY_ FOLCONJINS'.TWICLOSE _;_ OEAR- C(�J�Si ON. 0- 0 4 4 0 S 46" SOUTH 8URLIMGfON l.fi9. 12/.am 150o CLEAR FAILURE TO WIELD ROW RT. ANGLE--6RNIAOSIgE O 0 1 4 0 W 3819 SUM ®URLINGTQN 1.69 B/31/9'3 IWO , CLOUDY UNKNONN TURMNSr--SAIME DLR. 1 0 0 1 4 O E v, ( C) 1219 SUM BUOtL1NGTON 1669 4/Zl/99 -1100, CLOUDY. FAIsf.UM TO YIELD -RN RT-:_AWAE'-lIR0MlDE 0 . 0 1 4 0 4120. '-SOUTH 8LlRLIq GFi0N 1.d9 . 101 '8r/92 1T0®, CLEAR � OTHER '00. C1A w , TRIRNIING-uftE out. 1 O • 1 4 O S 3588 SNBAR! BURLINGTON 1.69 8/1T/9 Y300` CLEAR Up, FO1t .IUSEAENT 01MR C/ Aj"ION:' 2 0 1 4 O N t 324 SOUTH SURLIMSTOM A.69 1/ 419'5 TOO: CLLIUOY FOLLUNINIC' TQ01_CLOSE REAR'EW COLLtsidN O. 0 1 4 0 N TZ6 SOUTH 6URLTNNGTON 1.b9 Z/ 5/93 -Im SNOW FAILLE TO VIELtt ROW RT- ANOE-GROAMIDE 0 0 1 F O 11 � 3"S5T SOUTH BURLI!l6TON 1.T3 10/12/94 1200 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW HEAD ONN .COL.LISIDN 1 0 1 4 0 SZ6 SOUTH SURLINGTON 1.71 2112f" 2Z90 CLOUDY SLIPPERY RWW REAR END COLLISION I o 3 4 o y 4•i90 SOUTH BURLINGTaNN ,1.71 lO/Z4/92 1900 RAIN' EXCESSIVE SPEED RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE O 0 1 4 O S z 1669 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.71 bi 7/96 24" RAIN FOLLOWING-TOU CLOSE REAR NEW0 COLLISION 1 O 4 4 O S- i 359 SOUTH BURL.IM6TON 1.71 11.3/96 3200 SIM EXCESSIVE SPEED RT,*_ANGLE-BROADSIDE o 0 3 4 O 5 3225 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.71 T11 5/93 2500 CLEAR. CARELESS BICYCLIST HIT 61CTCILXST 1 0 1 4 0 E 349-1 SOUTH BURLINNGF414 2.11 8/10193 1900 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION O 0 1 4 O S 3509- SWTH BURLINGTON 1.71 6/ 4193 900 CLEAR OTHER VEHICLES OTHER -NON -COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O N 2346 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.72 6/ 1193 900 CLEAR • FOLIAMINIG TOtl CLOSE REAR END COLLISION • O 0 1 4 0 N 640 SOUTH SURLINGTOH 1.13' 113019Z 10M CLOUDY OTHIE R 'OlP. CAUSE REAR:'END EMLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S t 600 • SMITH -BUR"- NGT4N 1.73 1f31 92---Z100 , 5140 ! IMPROPER `PA33ENIG , TU!tl4INIG�SAs1E Dldt. O ,.O 3 4 O S 4965 SOUTH BURLINGTON1.T3 iiAo/93 2060 RAIN itutNNTiON REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 4 O y 4T13 SOUTH,BURL.MIDN 1.T3 IZ/IZ/93 900 CLOUDY EXCESSIVE SPEED RT• AMLE-BROADSIDE 0 0 :3 4 O N 749 SOUTH BURLINGTON OUT 1.73 2123196 800 FOG INATTENTION 1PURNING+�P. Dram 1 0 4 4 O y � 3ioO SOVtH 8MLIN410ft 2.13 1112TAG 1300. CLEAR . STOUP LIGHT/SIGN• VIOL RT. ANGLE-61tWoSlot 1 G 1 4 o n ZT+62 SOUTH-ALVA-JNGtQN 1.73 10/1S/% 1100 CLEAR FAILURE TO WIELD ROW RT.,ANGLE-BROADSIDE 0 a A 4. O N 1599 SOUTH BURLI"aTON I•73 5126*496 2600 ., CLOUDY STOP-LIGHTISIIGH VIOL RT.. ANNGLE-BRO ADSIDE 0 0 1 4- 0 W 84a SOUTH BURLINGTON 1•73 3110/95 2100 CLOUDY INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 2 0 1 4 O N l �. THIS ACCIDENT. OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT- THIS DATA SH(lUW NOT BE USED IN AN . ANALYSIS WITH • I OTHER. ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION- c c I VERMONT•AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE 161 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE RUN DATE 02./i2i9$ (PROGRAM TAD. H515) YEARS OF DATA 92 93 94 95 96 RUUTES US-7 SEAUENGE Nov OF SKID SIPS CLASS MURDER TOWN IL FAGE MR/19ITT TIM WEATHER CAUSE OF ACCLNNT.• 1"S.OF-ACCIDEN<�. INJ FAT CORE NO. COPE D1 176d SOUTH-SURLIMSTON 1.73 9/22195 '1300 CLMNY STOP LIGHT/SIGN VILIL HEAD ON COLLISION MS 0 1 4 0 N .592 SOUTH BURLINCTOti 1.73 Zf -7/96 1300 CLOUDY INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION, 0 0 1 4 0 N 1821 SOUTH BURL$NCTON 1.13 6fZZ196 1100 RA9N' FOLLOWING TOO.CLOSE REAR •END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 2563 SUM D URLINGTUN 1.73 9113176 1600 "a OTHER OPw CAUSE REAR , END COLLISION. O 0 1 4 U S 2.229 SuM BURLINGTON 1.73 W16192 ' 2300 CLeM STOP LIONT/SIGN VIdOL RT. ANGL"ROAOSIBE 1 0 1 4 0 5 I1TZ SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.T3 . 3f, 61" 1=0 CLWjDV FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE -REAR . EtUI COLLISION o 0 1 4 0 N 11Y5 S(Rff" BURLINGTON 1.73 1/IV" IWO CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR - END COLLISION O 0 1 4 0 N 394Z SOUTH ISURLINGTON 14173 10/ 2/94 2000 CLOUDY UTRER O`P. CAUSE TlJRKIMG=SANL DIR. 0 0 1 4 0 N 3089 SOUTH BURLINGTON 1.73 9/12194 2100 CLEAR INATTENTION REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 H 1341 SOUTH'SURL.INGIUM 1.T3 3420194 1200 CLEAR INATTENTION! REAR END COLLISION o 0 1 4 0 N 3170 SOUTH. BURLINGTON 1.83 IU31M 600 CL.EM FAILURE TO VIELD ROW .UTM COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N Lt95. suaLINom 4aO0 ".-- 2/13192 800 • -CLOWT INATTENTION ... REAR--_040 COLL ISIO1t 1 O 1 6 O S 3674 RURLINGTON 0001 12f12/95 1Z00 CLOUDY LEFT UF. CENTER OTHER COL.LiSION D 0 1 4 0 N 4129 BURLIN6TaN 0.01. 10119/92 MO RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 4 6 0 s 3411 BURLINGTON 0«01 7/31192 .2100 RAIN FOLLOWING TOD -CLOSE REAR ENP COLLISION 0 0 4 6 0 S 4765 OURLINOM - 0-61 111 4f931 1000 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SIGN VIOL RTe ANGLE= K(MZSIDE 2 O 1 Ti 0 S 4736 otmuNGTON 0.0Z 12116/93 1300 CLEAR STOP -.L14MISIGN.VIOL •TLRftlNQ-lW. Dtai 0 0 1 6 0 S 47?.O 'LiU1LLITt iEIIL- 0.02_ - 12/19193.-I00d:- t.UWV- ' STOP •L3tGKT/SICM; VIOL'.!!-,.ANGLE4PtOAOSIDE 0 0 1 6 0 S 479H BURLINGTON 0.02 12/z4f93 1700 CLEAR STOP LIOMUSIGN VIOL HfA0, O M COLLISION 1 0 1 6 o S -1223 8U%LZMiiTON 0.07 111 21M 4200 . RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE ' REAR END COLLISION O O 4 4 0 S T8'9.- BtmLINGTON 0.07 1119/9K3 1200 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOU • CLOSE - REAR � END COLLISION 0 0 , 1 6 O S 53" BIFRLIAGTom 0.08 ILIM/92 2100 CLOUDY FAILURE -TO' YIELDROW .REAII- END COLLISION 2 0 1 6 0 N 3847 BURLINSTUR 0.1:3 4/29f93 1T00 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLUSION 0 0 1. 6 0 S' 2111 ouni LOv Om 0.2.6 6/. _B194 ZZQO CLOUDY . LIQUORP 'CITATED NIT CURBING TO RIGHT 0 O 1 4 0 M 2381 BURLINGTON 0.17 6/29f94 2800 CLOUDY STOP LIGHT/SIGN VIOL RT• ANGLE--3ROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 0 S 1237 BURLINGTON 0.17 31 5/93 1200 OTHER/UNK FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TRARNING^SAME DIR. 1 0 1 6 0 W 1302 BURLINGTON 'II.1T 1/19/94 1400 CLEAR $TOP LIGHT/SIGN VIIlL. RT. AffGLE^-BROADSIDE 1 0 1 4 0 S 1T7d BURLINGTON 0.17 5/ 9/94 1200 CLEAR STOPLIGHT/SIGN OLIGHT/SIGN VIOL TURNING -SAME DIRd 0 0 1 4 0 g ZZ" BURLINGTON 0.1T 6/16/94 WO CLEAR- FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 0 E 395d SURLINGTON 0.1'f WIT/" 1500 CL.OIRDY STOP LIGHTISIGN VIOL. RT. ANGLF--BROADSIDe 1 0 1 4 0 S 3649 BURLINGTON 0.17 10/13/94 1600 CLEAR OTHER OP. CAUSE OTHER COLLISION 1 0 1 4 0 S 3565 SURL.3NGTON 0.11 B/14/91r 2300 CLEAR DRIVER 'FELL ASLEEP REAR END COL.LISIOL 1 0 1 4 0 N 112.7 BuKut rom 0.17 3/ 6/94 Too- CLcuoY FAILURE TO YIELD ROM HEAD ON COLLISION o 0 1 4 0 TA 3362 BURLINGTON GwI7 0120/93. 2000 CLEAR U14KNOWN EITHER COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 s 13 3o BURLINGTON 0.17 7/13/92 1"0 CLEAR STOP LIGHTISIGN VIOL UMER .COLL.ISIC" 0 0 1 6 o 2923 BURLINGTON 0.1T 10/ IM 1600 CLEAR. FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE --BROADSIDE 1 0 2 4 0 S 1Z44 . BURLINGTOTf 0.17 4/24/% 1300 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 3 0 1 4 0 S 1379 BUNUNGTON 0.17 5112196 2600 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD IRON, RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 6 0 1 4 0 S 1210 BURLINGTON O.l.T 31 7/96 500 SNOW FAILURE 7O YIELD ROW RT. ,ANGLE -BROADSIDE O 0 1 4 0 N 4666' fwRLIHGTIIN 0.17 11124192 2200 CLOUDY FAILINRE !TO YIELD -.ROW IRlf..ANGLE-ROAUSIDE 2 0 1 6 O S 356 IsuRL:INGTON 0.18 1/ 6195 I300 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SICA VIOL'RT. ANGL"ROADSIDE 0 0 1 4 z5z6 Su RL..INGTON 0.18 $111195 .2000 CLEAR STOP LIGfTT/SIGN VIOL TURNING -SANE AIR. 1 0 1 4 0 O W 1679 BURLINGTON 0.19 5i21195 1500 CLEAR FOLLOWING TM CLOSE REAR END COILLISIg" 4 0 1 4 O S M THIS ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY I1WROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS DATA eflOULD MDT BE USED IN AN ANALYSIS WITIL OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAAE LOCATION. VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE lbz STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE Rule DATE 02/IZ/9s (PROGRAM ►N1. H915) YEARS OF DATA 9Z 93 94 "_ 96 . ROUTES US-7 SEQUE44CE NO. OF SKID SYS CE.AS. WMIIER TOWN., HILEAGE. MR/D0/YY TIME WEATHER CAUSE .OF, ACCIDENT TTPt -OF ACCIDENT INJ _ FAT CODE 140._CDDE Dl "21 BURLINGTON A.14 ,12/30/94 1300 CLOUDY FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 3 0 2 4 0 S 393 BURLINGTON ' 0020 Ik 31./93 1z00 CLEAR STOP LIGHT/SYGN VIAL KT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE o O 1 6 0 S 607 BURLINGTON 0020 1125/94 11$00 CLOUDY STOP LIGHT/SIGN VIOL, OTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 4 0 N 3923 , . BURLINGTON 0020 9/ 5/94 1200 CI cuoy DEFECTIVE BRAKES OTTER Cola TSXO14 4 0 1 4 0 M 4161 BURLINGTON 0.20 11/261% 1400 CLOUDY CARELESS & NEGLIGENT REAR END COLLISION 2 9 1 4 0 NL 3m BULLL:INNGTOe4 0420 7/24/92- 14W CLEAR FAILURE TX7;,1P'IEL.D ROM TURNING^ -SANE DIR. 1 0. 7 6 0S 4169 BURLINGTON 0.20 10/1919�2 1000 RAIN STOP Lis"r/S$6N VIOL SIDESWIPE-SAAE DIR. O O 1 6 0 S 4142 BURLINGTON 0.20 W23/92 2200 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. AWLE-8ROAUSiIDE 2 0 1 6 0 5 4128 BURLINGTON 0.20 10119/92 2200 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD RUIN TURNINN6-smi DIR. 0 0 1 6 0 S Z917 SURIINGTON 0.20 7/20192 900 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE. -BROADSIDE 0 0 1 6 0 I� 4166 ' SURLIOGION1 0.22 ll/Z9/94 IMO : CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD Raw REAR -END coLN. siu N 0 0 1 4 0 U 4428 BURLINNGTTJN 0.1a _ 11/_2/94 1790 CLOUDY PHT. DEFECT;;OF„OP. REAR=fWX,,0LLISION 0 0 1 4 0 S 2368 _ BURL.INGTON 0423 5/10/94 1300 CLEAR HIT & . M* VEHICLE OTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 N lm BURLINGTON 0.25 4/ 1193 2100 CLEAR FAILURE 70 YIELD ROM RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 6 0 S 956 BURLINGTON 0.25 1/201" 2.500 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROM TURNING-4ARE DIR • 0 0 1 6 0 N 350 BURLINGTON Os23 2J 7/V4 600 CLOUDY FAILURE TO' YIELD ROW TuRNIieO!-CPP. DIR. 0 -0 1 6 0 N 81'S4 BURLINGTLINN 0.26 3/141" GQQ►- CLOUDY IMPROPER TUM TURN P..DIN * 0 0 1 6 0 N 369 BURLINGTON _ - 0.3T_ _.. E/' 9/95 woo; _ CLOUDY FOL.L OWIN'R_T=.' CME .: REAR' END COL LISIONN 1 0 1 -two BURt.mrON 0-if 1./ 8/95 1600 CL t" 11M IMATtENTIREAR Ek COL.L.I3ION 3 0 1 6 0 s Z939 . BWLLINSTUN Qm33 T/12/9S 1600 CLEARFAILURE. TO, YIELD RON HEAR UN COLLISION 2 0 1 6 0 N 466 : BiWINGTON 0.33 1/ 41" 1500 SHOW STOP-ILIGHT/SIGN VIOL , EEre .ANGLE- 0ADSIDE A 0 1 6 0 M 3978 . BURLINGTON 0.33. lb/ 7/9z lic'1 L;LL'CM FAILURE ?O.-YIELD ROW TtN1LFUWR-SAME DIR. 0 0 1 6 0 S 10To, BINRLYNCTON 0.33 3/91195 IMN dIMR/UNK.FAILURE TO YIELD ROM RT. ANG4X-�8RQA0SWEe 0 0 1 6 0 0 3081 BURLINGTON _0.33 11/16/96 1900 CLEAR IMPROPER-- TURN TURMI P+ DIR. 1 0 1 AA O S 1603 BURLINGTON 0.33 4/12/96 "0 RAIN FOL.LOMING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION a 0 1 6 0 N 25" BURL.INGTU" 0.33 9/ 9/96 2700 CLOUDY INATTENTION REAR E RD COLLISION 1 0 4 6 O S 2724 SURLIN,STUN 0.33 9129196 600 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 6 O N zu? BURLINGTON 0.313 7/22/" 2000 CLEAR FAILURE -TO YIELD ROW HEAD ON .COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 S 1614 BURLINGTON 0033 5/11/95 1300 RAIN OBJ OETC"ED FROM VEH OTHER COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 5 1156 BURLINGTON 0.33 3115/94 2200 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD,RON HERO ON COLLISION 0 0 1 6 O H 1078. .BURLINGTON 0.33 3/ 2/94 700 CLEAR, INATTENTIONN REAR END COLLISION 1 0 .1 b 0 $ z4V8 BURLINGTON 0033 7/ 5/% 609 OTHER/UN'EK STOP L IGNT/SIGN VIOL Rr. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 0 3, 6 O EE 1177 AkURL.INGTON 0.313 Z/'3/93 1300 CLOUDT FOL.L MXMS TOE] CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 6 D N 1808 BURLINGTON 0.33 3/ 7/93 100 CLOUDY,. FAILURE TO YIELD ROM TULELIPM-SAME DIR. -0 0 1 6 o N 43V7 - DDNNRL:INGT'UN � 0..33 1Z/131.94 1600. CLEAR IMPROPER TURN TU%MING-0PP. DIA. 0 0 1 6 O S UTS : BuRuffeTarl 0.33 2/10/" TO CLOUDY IMPROPER ._TURN TURNING -Epp. DIR. 2 0 1 6 0 M 3024 URLl*GTf_NN G.33 7/Z9093 1800 CLEAR Witttst Ofu stAxAm HIT PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 6 0 N 31O9z BURLINGTON 0.33 7112/93 600 RAIN FAILURE TO YIELD ROM MEAD ONCOLLISION A 0 1 6 0 S 35% BURL:INGTiHE Q.343 Il/13/95 2300 CL,OMY STOP LIGHT/SIBN VIOL. 6RT• A"OLE�GROADSIOE 0 0 1 6 0 E 3509 BURL.INGTOM O.3T 9/ 1/92 2100 CL:OUDT FAILURE ..TO YIELD RON 07. ANGLE-BILOA0SIDE 0 0 1, ,6 0 E 4249 BURLIN6rON 0.348 IW31193� 1TOO RAIN FULLOMIE[!E jaG CLOSE ReAEL . END COLLISION 0 0 1 ►i 0 N 3545 BURLINGTON 0*34 lo/ 5f" 1200 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROLL RT. ANNGI.E-SROADSIDEr 0 0 1 6 0 5 3107 BURLINGTON 0040 7/30193 1300 . RAIN INATTENTION F*AR END COLLISION 1 0 1 6 o S a THIS ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO TNNE LAST HIGHWAY IMPROVENENNT PROJECT- THIS DATA .SHOUiD? NOT BE USED IN AN► ANALYSIS WIT►N OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION• ROUTE: US-7 SEQUENCE mn3ER TUMN 5096 SURL.INGTU" 2379 BURL.INGTOM 1261 BURLINGTON 1865. suptuN6Tm 354T BURLi116T(( 602. BURLINGTON 1808 OURLINGTm 3052 BURLINGTON 3341 BURLINGTON T BURLINGTON 37! 0 BURLINGTON 5Z6* : BURLINGTON 705 BURLINGTON- 497• BURLINGTON 2517 8UR1.IASTQN Ifaz .Bummaft 1765' BURLIN61" LLUalitfi'm 11.35 BURIN M M3 WJRLIILaTg1l. 1200 : , vJRLvkR 4691 BURL1116 TI 340 BIPaIMh'r m 1237 SURL.I IUM 360 BURLINGTON 3702 BURLINGTON 1"387 BURLINGTON 5331 BURLINGTON 3356 BURLINGTON 51,42 BURLINGTON . 4499 BURL M(;TUN 2115 BURLINGTON 3927- SURLIN+GTGN 4265 BURLINGTON T5Z BURLINGTON. 6" BURLINGTON- 5298 BUALINGTM 990 BURLINGTON L193 BURLINGTON 2561 BURLIKGTYtN . •2120 BURLINGTON 2274 BURLINGTUM 1108 BURLINGTON VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION STATE 14160WAY SORTED ACCIDENT FILE (PROGRAM NOs H5791 YEARS OF DATA 92 93 94 95.96 MILEAGE MM/OD/YY TIME WEATHER Oo*O. 12/2T/93 2300 CLOUDY 0*43 6/ 5/92 UMO CLEAR 0.44 4/ 3f" 2200 CLEAR 0.4+4 3/11194 1400 CLEAR 0:46 IV 9195 1700 CLEAR 0.49 XIZW92 1000 CLEAR 0.49 S/ZZ/95 1900. CLEF 0.50 11/14/96 1500 CLEAR. 0050 7/2B/92 1300 CLEAR 0.51 3115/92: 1600 CLEAR 0.52. 10/25/94 2000 CLEAR 9054 . 12/20/92 ..1300'.-CLEEAR Gloss Z/27/95 1300 SNOW 0.56 1/1T/9a5 1"0 CLEAR 0.56 7/181" .13QO CLEAR 0.36 4/,1193 1700 RAIN 0.5+6 4/ � 3193 1400 CLEAR 0.5A 11/16195 . 18QO SHOW __ 0.60 3/10/94 M00 CLEAR, G.61 8/ 3/44 1600 CLEAR 0.161 _36/19/94 1Z00 CLOUDY .0461 11/Z3193 700 CLEAR 0&61 D/27/93 1"0 CLEAR 0.61-3/2019Z .1500 CLEAR 0e6I 1/14/92 1400 CLEAR 0s61 9/28/92 2600 CLEAR 0.62 5/13196 1600 CLEAR 0.61 12/26/92 1100 CLEAR 0.61 12/11/96 1200 CLOUDY 0.61 121 719Z .1700 CLEAR 0.61 10/25192- 1700 CLOUDY 0.61'3/25/92 1400 CLEAR 0.62 12/29/95 1700 SNOW 0.63 10/23192 500: CLEAR- 0.63 1/ Z196 1600 CLOUDY 0.63 .2/21/95 .9900 ' CLOUDY 0.63 11/30/92 1000 CLEAR 0.63 1127192 1700- SNOW 0.63 - ff 3M _.2000 CLEAR 0.63 5/ZW93 1300 RAIN 0.63 5110/93 1400 CLOUDY 0.63 Z/ W93 2400 CLEAR 0.63 3/ Z/94 100 CLEAR PAGE 163 RUN DATE 0Z/12f98 NO. OF SKIP- SYS CLAS. {CAUSE .OF ACC30EMT TYPE -OF ACCIOENT IN3 FAT. -COOT NO. CODE 01 FOY,Ur4tHG TOO CLOSE REAR : ENT? COLLISION - 1 0 1 6 0 if EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 S FAILURE TO YIELD RON RT. AMLE-BXDAOSIDE 0 0 1 6 0 N FOL,LOWLN6 TOO CL[ASE RFM -LEND . COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 S OIKER OP. CAUSE TURNING -SAME DIR. 1 0 1 6 O S FOLLOWING. TOO CLOSE REAR END•Cat.L:IStOM 0 0 1 6 0 S FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 2 0 .1 6 0 11 FAILURE TO YIELD Raid . TURNING -SAME Dldt. 0 0 1 6 0 N INATTENTION REAR EM COLLISION 2, G 2 6 O S FOLL3WING.TOO:LtASE" REAR.EW COLUSION 1 O a k o S CARLELESS .PEDESTRIAN . HIT VEMYRIAM 1 0 lot 0 N INATTENTIO"_ _ . . REAK •t:LN) -,COL USION 0 0 : a 6 0 S SLIPPERY ROAD RT. AMLE•-BROADSIDE 1 O 3 6 0 y ]EMPOWER TURN RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 2 0 1 6 0 M OTHER OP. CAUSE TURNING -SAKE DIR. Z 0 1 6 0 is FA ItA RE -TO YIELD ROW . RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE a 0 1 6 0 S FAILURE TO YIELD RON.RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1 6 0 W Ow• POOR -4umpi LT__ - ,REAR- EML1_.COLLIsIAN 2 O 1 6 0 N FAILURE TO YIELD ROW-Tt1RNIWg-SANE DIR. a 0 1 6 0 td FAILURE TO YIELD ROW,HEAD ON COLLISIOM 0 0 1 6 0 E FAILAIRE TO -YIUD 7 ROW RTo .ANGLE-AROADSIDE 0 0 1 6 0 N UP =POOR J1XYGENEMT - READ ON '-COLL.ISIUA Z 0 1 6 0 v FAILURE TO YIELD ROCREAD ON`:'CMUSION 1 0 1 6 A S FAILURE TO YXFL.D ROW.TW%XNq,;O". DIR. 0 0 1 6 0 tt FAILURE TO YIELD ROW ttT. ANGLE• -BROADSIDE 0 0 1 6 O M FAILURE -TO YIELD ROW OTHER COLLISION 0 0 A 6 O S IMPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 3 0 1 6 O S FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TURNING -DPP® DIRa 1 6 3 6 g S FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGL.E-BROADSIDE 0 0 i 6 O W FAILURE TO YIELD ROW HEAD ON COLLISION 0 .0 1 6 0 M IMPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 1 0 1. 6 0 b FAILURE TO YIELD ROW.TURNING-40PP4 AIR. 0 0 R 6 0 N UNKNOWN REAR END COLLISION 40 0 3 6 0. N IMOROIPER TURF! TURNING -SMILE Ott. O 0 Jt 6 0 S IMPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 O 1 6 0 S FAILURE TO YIELD ROid HEAD ON COLLISION 2 0 A 6 0 V EXCESSIVE SPEED TURNING -I"* DIR. 0 0 2 6 0 S EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR END COLLISION 0 0 1 6 O S FA#LURE .TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE 0 O 1 6 O M FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION x 0 L 6 0 S FAILURE TO YIELD ROW RT. ANGLE-GROADSIDE 0 D 1 6 0 S FULLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR FRO CdU_ISIOM 0 0 1 6 0 S FAILURE TO YIELD ROW TURNING-OPP. LAIR. 0 0 1 6 0 N THIS ACCIDENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE LAST HIGHWAY I"MDVEMENt PROJECT. THIS DATA. SHOULD NOT BE USED IN AN ANALYSIS NIT" OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SANE UXATIDN. 1. YERHDNT,AiGEHCY Of TRANSPORTATION PAGE 164 STATE HIGHWAY SORTED ACCIDENT FIRE RUN DATE 02/1Z196 frROGRAA NCI. H5T51 YEARS OF DATA 92 93 94 95 96 ROUTE' US-T SEQUENCE NO. OF. SKID SYS CLAS.- UL MBER Taw" MI LEASE MH/PDIYT - -T-Aft WEATHER CAUSE OF, ACCIDENT TYPE--OF-ACC IOENt I M 1 FAT Ct![?E - no. CODE p1 1106 BURLINGTON 0.63 3/ 2194 2100 CLOUDY LIQU1Mt CITATED REAR END.COLLISION 1 0 2 6 O N 610 BURLINGTON 0.63 LIZ6194 700 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW READ ON COLLISION 1 0 1 6 0 W 746 BUALIAGTON 0.63 1112494 .(.ZOO CLUU DY EXCESSIVE SPEED HEAD ON COLLISION 0 0 3 6 0 M 4023 BURLINGTON 0*63 91-11194 800 1600 CLEAR INATTENTIOW NIT PEDESTRIAN' ' 1 0 1 6 0 S 4b76 BURLINGTON 0.63 I1/2S/94 CLEAR OT11ER OP• CAUSE REAR END- COLLISION 1 0 1 6 0 N 3TIT BURLINGTON 0.12 9/..'l/Pt ..IgOb . RArM OTHER IPEH• .frAULT._ T11R}LIIII rr1OP1 . DIR• _ L 0 1 6 a N 2647 BURLINGTON 0.73 9/13/96 9900 RAIN OTHER VEHICLES REAR,ENO COLLISION 0 0 4 6 0 N 541 BURLINGTON 0.T9 V 3/95 MO CLEAR DRIVING W/O LIGHTS RT. ANGL.L'-BROADSIDE 0 0 2 6 0 E 22.45 BURLINGTON 0.6Z 5/ 1/93 200 CLEAR LIgOORt MATED REAR END COLLISION 1 0 2 6 0 N 2309 BURLINGTON 0.02. T114195 -190o CLEAR FAILURE TO -YIELD ROW RT• A.HGt..E�-SROUADSIDE 1: 0 1 6 0 S 3811 SURLINIMND 0062 15/14192 1600.. RAIN FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR Egli/ CQLI.ISIQN 0 0 1 6 0 S 3309 BQRLIP1GTOt# O.B2 >u1T,i�4__ OTt ._ CLEAR OTHER OP. CAUL -- RI I1 -S1111 : on. 0 O . 1 6 0, S 14" "PL:INGTON 0.82 2/li/93 1400 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW OTHER COLLISION 6 0 N 3225 1WRLINGTDH 0.62 T/24196 1400 RAIN INATTENTION REAR fmO COLLISION 1. 0 ' 1 6 0 S 1141 .SURL:INGTON 0*83_ AV.2192 .1000 CLEAR EXCESSIVE SPEED REAR-m.CQLLI3ION 0 0 1 6 0 N 406Z. ®UALUSTON 0.90- LOU/9I 180Q RAIN FOLLOWING TOO -CLOSE REAR.Ef@:COLLTsIoN 1 0 1 6 0 L1 4426 SURWtGTQN 0.90 ld/.'9143 2100 CLORay INATTENTION REAR fEND=COLLISION 0 0 1 6 0 R 2409 : BlARR:iNETORt 0:90 -- .611E± ..10QO CLEAR . Q>ltlER DP._ CAUSE ,.-----1141eHIl-SA1¢; AIRS _ Q 01 R 4619, BURLINGTON 0.90 1Ij19/92 800 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD ROW _ RT• ANGLE-BROADSIOE 0 0 1 6 0 E ilia 6URLI"GTUH Go" 5/31/98 1900 CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR END COLLISION 1 0 1 6 tw 1L 2466 - SURL.INGTON 0.90 8/Z6(916.: 1600 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD RON - IKU: AKGLE-9ROADSIIDE 1 0 1 6 is E 681 BURLINGTON 0.90 3J1I19b- 2200. CLEAR, IMPROPER TURN Rt• AtMOLL-0ROADSIVE 3 0 1 6 0 S 1196 BURLINGTON 0.96 3/111% , 700 CLEAR (FAILURE TO, YIELO .ROM _ READ ' ON ; CMLISION 1 0 1 6 0 S 536 5QRL.INGTON• 1.02 I12.4j" 800.. -CLEAR FOL.IAWIPRS TOO_ CLOSE_ OTHER,C�OLLISION, 0 0 3 6 0 ;S 2572 BURLINGTON ImIT 5/291" 300 CLEAR LIgUOR' CITATED H.T-T tLIRdEw TO RIGHT 1 0 1 6 0 S Z42 BURLINGTON 1.18 7/171" 1000 CLOUDY FAILURE TO YIELD RON RTo, 11NGLE-6ROADSIpE 0 0 1 6 O S 1TT6 BhARLING`TON 1.10 4/16/92 3100 CLEAR INATTENTION TU'ANIWA-SANE QIR. 0 0 1 6 0 E 1924 BURLINGTON 1.18 3/2S/99 2600, CLEAR FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE REAR OW COLLISION 1 0 1 6 0 N 3TOZ BURLINGTON 1o18 SM/94 2100 CLEAR HIT S RUN VEHICLE RT. ,ANGLE-BROAUSIOE 1 0 1 6 0 11 2455 BURLINGTON 1.19 4116.194 2400 CLEAR INATTENTION RT. AMLE-BROARSIDE 1 0 1 6 0 N 173.1 BURLINGTON 1-18 3/14/93 MO CLOUT OTHER VEHICLES HET.SIGN 110 LOFT 0 0 1 6 0 N 450 13UM XGTON 1.18 VZU93 1400 CLEAR IMPROPER TURN RT. ANGLE-61tOADSIOE O 0 2 6 0 E 353 BURLINGTON Iola 2/20/92 900: CLOUDY, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE NEAR EM COLLISION 0 0. 1 6 0 IN 21To. BURLINGTON 1.28 4/23/93 2500 RAIN EXCESSIVE SPIEEO REAR.9W COLLISION 1 0 1 6 0 S 3073 BOML.INGTON Iola 7/ : W93 1200 CLEAR UP • POOR JUDGEMENT - OTHER : COLLISION 1 0 2 6 '0 E 2676 BURLINGTON 1.18 6/7L0/93 _2300 _ CLOUDY -FOLLOWING YOU CLOSE _ REAR _�&W_.C�Y CJSION O 0 1 6 a TM 371-7 BURLINGTON1.18 A0/20/95 9 06i CLEAR HIT C RUN VEHICLE RirAR :EIUa COLLISION O 0 1 6 0 N 1619 BURLINGTON 1.19 4/ 2192 ITOO CLEAR FOLLOWING - TOO CLOSE REAR , END COLLISION 0 0 1 6 O S %*I BURLINGTON 1.20 IV b/92 1200 CLOUDY INATTENTION RT. ANGLE -BROADSIDE -0 o 1 6 0 N 2206 BURLiNCTON- 1.Z0. 6/•3/92 1200 CLEAR IMPROPER TURN AT. BNGLE--mRoAUSIDE 0 0 1 6 0 h 2159 BURLINGTON 1.20 2/ W92.. 1600 . CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW . TURN1119^SAME DIN. 0 0 1 6 o S J` 2.%4 8URLINGTO", I.ZO 6F2'l�/93..1800 CLEAR CARFIESS E NEGLIGENT SIDESHIr"AMIE DIR. Q 0 1 6 0 H M 1930 BURLINGTON i 2.20 3/2T193 2300 CLEAR FAILURE TO YIELD ROW OTHER COLI.TSION o 0 a 6 0 S THIS ACCIDENT _Occ KREO PRIOR TO THE LAST H,ISHNAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. THIS DATA SHMLD IM BE USED IN AN ANALYSIS WITH OTHER ACCIDENTS AT THE SAME LOCATION* H.A.L. No. /3 SUPPLEMENT HIGH ACCIDENT LOCATIONS - SECTIONS - ROUTE LOG ORDER /2 1990 - 1994 DATA STATEWIDE No. No. No, No. Critical Actual Ratio Route System Town Mileage ADT YRS Acc. Fat. Inj. PDO Rate Rate Act/Crit. # 53 US 7 # 109 US 7 # 105 US 7 # 89 US 7 * 96 US 7 * 102 US 7 �i 113 US 7 11 # i 1 US 7 c_= Severity Index ($/Accident) /1 PA-U Rutland City 1.800 - 2.100 17014 5.0 55 0 41 29 3.847 5.904 1.535 25,418 PA-U Rutland City 2.200 - 2.500 17030 5.0 38 0 39 16 3.847 4.076 1.059 33,013 PA-U Middlebury 4.354 - 4.654 15270 5.0 36 0 26 18 3.916 4.306 1.100 24,556 PA-U Middlebury 4.854 - 5.154 13340 5.0 37 0 15 26 4.007 5.066 1.264 16,527 PA-U Shelburne- 4.847 - 0.293 2359 5.0 56 0 41 26 �F .659 4.335 1.185, 24,616 S. Burlington y - PA-U S. Burlington 0.393 - 0,693 27514 5.0 61 0 31 38 3.579 4.049 1.131 19,041 PA-U S. Burlington 1.093 - 1.393 30185 5.0j 61t 0 34 37 3.534 3.691 1.044 20,385 PA U S. Burlington- 1.493 - 0.055 30880 5.0 119 0 65 69 3.524 7.039 1.998 19,882 Burlington _ I tV (.. /1 Ave. Cost per accident based on 1992 National Safety Council Estimates Fatality $880,000 Injury $29,500 Property Damage $6,500 *In Five -Year Program # Class 1 Town Highway /2 Routes are Logged from South to North and from West to East /3 H.A.L. No. Corresponds to Statewide -Ranking by Actual/Critical Ratio, on Pages 15 to 28. H_A.L No. /3 Route System * 54 US 7 PA-U Holmes Rd. # 80 US 7 PA-U W. Allen Street VT 15 # 89 US 7 PA-U Upper Weldon Street Lower Weldon Street # 3 US 7 PA-U Washington St. E. Washington St. # 90 US 7 PA-U BR US 4 Terrill St. HIGH ACCIDENT LOCATIONS 27 - INTERSECTIONS - ROUTE LOG ORDER /2 1990 - 1994 DATA STATEWIDE No. No. No. No. Critical Actual Ratio Severity Index Town Nfileage ADT YRS Acc. Fat. Inj. PDO Rate Rate Act/Crit. ($/Accident) /I S. Burlington 0.860 - 0.880 30995 5.0 54 0 33 33 0.686 0.955 1.392 22,000 Winooski City 0.150 - 0.170 25760 5.0 38 0 15 30 0.718 0.808 1.125 16,776 St. Albans City 0.940 - 0.960 13940 5.0 22 0 10 15 0.802 0.865 1.079 17,841 Rutland City 1.090 - 1.110 17935 5.0 61 1 54 27 0.754 1.864 2.472 43,418 Rutland City 1.270 - 1.290 25145 5.0 35 0 24 19 0.710 0.763 1.075 23,757 /.I Ave. Cost per accident based on 1992 National Safety Council Estimates /2 Routes are Logged from South to North and from West to East Fatality $880,000 Injury $29,500 Property Damage $6,500 /3 H.A.L. No. Corresponds to Statewide -Ranking by Actual/Critical *In Five -Year Program # Class 1 Town Highway Ratio, on Pages 37 to 53. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOI` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 5, 2003 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Smichenko: Notice of Decision Revised Final Plan SD-03-07 1400 Shelburne Road Enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board's (DRB) Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision for as -built phase one landscaping plans for the !DX Planned Unit Development. The DRB's approval is subject to the 2 conditions listed on page 2 of the enclosed decision. If you have any questions concerning this approval, please call the Planning and Zoning Office. Sinc rely yours, Ja t M. Hu ley Associate Planner Jmh cc: Timothy Duff, Kessel/Duff enc. \drblsub\I DX\S D-03-07.cor. doe ■w® Making a Difference in Healthcare° aVx IDX Systems Corporation 40 IDX Drive tel 802.862.1022 PO Box 1070 fax 802.862.6848 Burlington, VT 05402 url www.idx.com April 26, 2004 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Raymond I Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David I Scott Director of Program Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX Systems Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Attached is our Transportation Demand Management Plan Update for April 2004. Please note that our programs remain unchanged since the last filing. We continue to offer the information and programs as described in the update. Sincerely, at)�✓�� nne A. Weaver orporate Services & Facilities Enclosure Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN APRIL 2004 UPDATE • Facilities Database IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific transportation alternatives available through the CCTA as well as providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. New hire Orient-aiion Paciiage Information regarding CCTA Ride Share and Guaranteed Ride Home programs is provided to all IDX new hires in Burlington. Included in this orientation is the IDX form to sign up for the CCTA Monthly Bus Pass, subsidized at 100% by IDX. The CCTA Monthly Bus Pass sign-up form, including instructions to the employee, is also in the IDX Forms Database, providing online availability to all Burlington employees as an transportation option. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our onsite cafeteria, which is heavily subsidized, has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early, since it opens at 7:30 AM and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. • Transportation Alternatives IDX continues to provide 100% subsidy of monthly bus passes to those employees who wish to utilize this option. Communication of the transportation alternatives is handled through the New Hire Orientation and the IDX Forms Database, available to all Burlington employees. • New Pre -Tax Transportation Benefit Program Although this does not have an immediate implication in Burlington as we fund Burlington 100%, we have instituted a company -wide Pre -Tax Transportation Benefit Program to offer employees the benefit of paying for qualified commuter expenses using pre-tax dollars. State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voioe>TDD Donna Kinville City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So Burlington VT 05403 Re: Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Runoff Dear Ms. Kinville, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 FAX 802-241-3287 TEL 802-241-3770 February 12, 2004 Enclosed are two copies of the Public Notice for the comment period for an Authorization to Discharge under General Permit #3-9010 proposed for issuance to IDX Systems Corporation. The Authorization to Discharge Will authorize the discharge of stormwater runoff from IDX located on Route 7 in South Burlington, Vermont to North Brook. We respectfully request that a copy of the Public Notice be posted in the Town Offices starting 02/13/2003 through 02/23/2004. The other copy is for your local officials. We are also sending copies of these notices to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional_ copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, J111111�1-110-0;'�6 11" Michelle Lavigne Administrative Assistant Stormwater Management Section enclosures (3) cc. Board of Selectman (w/enclosure) Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford/Rutland/Springfield/St Johnsbury State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD Donna Kinville City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So Burlington VT 05403 Re: Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Runoff Dear Ms. Kinville, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 FAX 802-241-3287 TEL 802-241-3770 February 12, 2004 Enclosed are two copies of the Public Notice for the comment period for an Authorization to Discharge under General Permit #3-9010 proposed for issuance to IDX Systems Corporation. The Authorization to Discharge will authorize the discharge of stormwater runoff from IDX located on Route 7 in South Burlington, Vermont to North Brook. We respectfully request that a copy of the Public Notice be posted in the Town Offices starting 02/13/2003 through 02/23/2004. The other copy is for your local officials. We are also sending copies of these notices to other local officials and interested persons who have asked to be included on our mailing list. We will be glad to send you additional copies if you desire or add names of interested parties to our mailing list. Sincerely, Michelle Lavigne Administrative Assistant Stormwater Management Section enclosures (3) cc. Board of Selectman (w/enclosure) Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittsford,/Rutland'Springfie ld/St. Johnsbury w AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: February 13, 2004 - February 23, 2004 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: IDX Systems Corporation PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PO Box 1070 Burlington VT 05402 GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER: 3-9010 PERMIT NUMBER: 3347-9010 PREVIOUS PERMIT NUMBER: 1-0512 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: North Brook EXPIRATION DATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE: August 5, 2010 DESCRIPTION: This is a draft authorization to discharge proposed for issuance to IDX Systems Corporation for the discharge of stormwater runoff from IDX located in South Burlington,Vermont to North Brook. The means of treatment include Wet Ponds and Vegetated Swales. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. -2- FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application is on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records and may be obtained by calling 802-241-3770 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed authorization to discharge are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) February 23, 2004, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The general permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered by DEC prior to issuance of an authorization to discharge under the general permit. FINAL ACTION/APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny an authorization to discharge under the general permit. Any person may, within thirty (30) days after authorization to discharge issuance or denial, appeal the VANR determination to the Vermont Water Resources Board pursuant to Title 10 V.S.A., Chapter 47, subchapter 1269. Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S. McLEAN WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-9119 TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) February 18, 2003 Raymond J. Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY EDWARD G. ADRIAN Re: IDX Drive - License Agreement and Landscaping Agreement Dear Ray: Enclosed please find the original License Agreement for the proposed GMP underground utility line within the IDX Drive right- of-way and the Landscaping Agreement in connection with the replacement of 11 trees within the IDX Drive right-of-way. Please have Chuck Hafter sign both documents before a witness and notary public as duly authorized agent of the City of South Burlington. As discussed, I would ask that you hold the executed originals until (1) the City has received payment of the $23,100.00 per the Landscaping Agreement; (2) Public Works hastier'' confirmed that the valve cover head has been changed; (3) the "extra" utility pole issue has been resolved; and (4) the revised plan from Lamoureaux and Dickinson is available for inspection. Meanwhile, please give me a call with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure son509O.cor STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPRCOM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE(rilFIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S. McLEAN WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-9119 TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) February 20, 2003 Ravmond J. Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Drive - Green Mountain Power License Agreement Dear Ray: AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY EDWARD G. ADRIAN Enclosed please find a copy of correspondence from Molly Lebowitz, including GMP's Certificate of Liability Insurance in connection with the installation of the utility line within the IDX Drive right-of-way. Please let me know of any comments or questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure Son5096.cor Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, Iu,. A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W Timothy M. Eustace Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. 171 Battery Street P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402 Burlington, Vermont • Plattsburgh, New York February 19, 2003 Molly K. Lebowitz E-mail: mlebowitz(a)dinsexom Re: IDX Systems Corporation and City of South Burlington to Green Mountain Power Corporation Dear Tim, I am enclosing the original Certificate of Insurance (Excess Liability) evidencing Green Mountain Power's liability insurance in connection with the installation of the redundant power line for IDX. IDX is in the process of issuing the check for $23,100 to the City for payment due under the Landscaping Agreement. Please feel free to call with any questions. Thank you. cc: Peter Smichenko Very truly yours, DINSE, KNAPP & McANDREW, P.C. --YN� Molly K. Lebo -tz TEB 0 2003 LTI t,f'Ct _.._.... 209 Battery Street, P.O. Box 988, Burlington, Vermont 05402 P. 802.864.5751 • f. 802.862.6409 • www.dinse.com Form A Certificate Number: 27002A7 ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED Hamilton, Bermuda CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (Excess Liability) This Certificate is furnished to the Certificate Holder named below as a matter of information only. Neither this Certificate nor the issuance hereof makes the Certificate Holder an additional Insured under the policy of insurance identified below (the "Policy") or modifies the Policy in any manner. The Policy terms are solely as stated in the Policy or in any endorsement thereto. Any amendment, change or extension of the Policy can only be effected by a specific endorsement issued by the Company and attached to the Policy. The undersigned hereby certifies that the Policy has been issued by Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited (the "Company") to the Named Insured identified below for the coverage described and for the policy period specified. Notwithstanding any requirements, terms or conditions of any contract or other document with respect to which this Certificate may be issued or to which it may pertain, the insurance afforded by the Policy is subject to all of the terms of the Policy. NAME OF INSURED: Green Mountain Power Corporation PRINCIPAL ADDRESS: 163 Acorn Lane, Colchester, VT 05446 POLICY POLICY From: 9/1/2002 NUMBER: X0270A1A02 PERIOD: To: 9/l/2003 RETROACTIVE DATE: 6/01/1986 DESCRIPTION OF COVERAGE: Claims -First -Made Excess Liability Policy LIMIT OF $ 1,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate, where applicable. LIABILITY: DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS: To lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, repair, maintain, replace and remove underground lines, cables and appurtenances within the IDX Drive right-of-way in South Burlington, Vermont Should the Policy be cancelled, assigned or changed in a manner that is materially adverse to the Insured(s) under the Policy, the undersigned will endeavor to give 60 days advance written notice thereof to the Certificate Holder, but failure to give such notice will impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the Company, the undersigned or any agent or representative of either. DATE: 2/12/2003 ISSUED TO: City ofSouth Burlington ADDRESS: 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 ("Certificate Holder") AEGIS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. BY: ` " ' At Jersey City, New Jersey 9001 (8/87) Copies: White —Certificate Holder; Canary —Aegis Insurance Services, Inc.; Pink —Insured; Goldenrod —Broker Phis certificate is executed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Group as respects such insurance as is afforded by those companies. BM0068 Certificate of Insurance This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no tights upon you the certificate holder. This certificate is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed below. This is to certify that (Name and address of Insured) GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION 163 Acorn Drive Colchester, VT 05446 s, at the issue date of this certificate, insured by the Company under tht vvi is not altered by anv renuimn-ritterm nr ennditinn of anv enntract Expiration Type Continuous* Extended X Policy Term Workers Compensation General Liability Claims Made Occurrence Retro Date Automobile Liability Owned Non -Owned Hired ject to all their terns, exclusions and conditions Expiration Dates Policy Numbers Limits of Liability 01/01/2004 WC1-111-253808-013 Coverage afforded under WC law of Employers Liability the following states: Bodily Injury By Accident VT $500,000 Each Accident Bodily Injury By Disease $500,000 Policy Limit Bodily Injury By Disease $500,000 Each Person General Aggregate -Other than Prod/Completed Operations Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability Per Occurrence Personal and Advertising Injury Per Person / Organization Other Liability Other Liability Each Accident - Single Limit - B. I. and P. D. Combined Each Person Each Accident or Occurrence Each Accident or Occurrence C Job Number: Project on IDX Drive O M M E N T S *If the certificate expiration date is continuous or extended term, you will be notified if coverage is terminated or reduced before the certificate expiration date. However, you will not be notified annually of the continuation of coverage. Special Notice - Ohio: Any person who, with intent to defraud or knowing that he / she is facilitating a fraud against an insurer, submits an application or files a claim containing a false or deceptive statement is guilty of insurance fraud. Important information to Florida policyholders and certificate holders: in the event you have any questions or need information about this certificate for any reason, please contact your local sales producer, whose name and telephone number appears in the lower left corner of this certificate. The appropriate local sales office mailing address may also be obtained by calling this number. Notice of cancellation: (not applicable unless a number of days is entered below) . Before the stated expiration date the company will not cancel or reduce the insurance afforded under the above policies until at least XX days notice of such cancellation has been mailed to: Office: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT Phone: 802-864-3400 Certificate Holder: City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Elizabeth Gaherty Authorized Representative Date Issued: 02/12/2003 Prepared By: DP Invoice Number Invoice Datcher ID Gross Amount Discount Take Late Chargev✓V✓ Paid Amount )21903A 19.Feb.2003 00004900 23,100.00 0.00 0.00 23,100.00 CITY OF SO B URLINGTON FEE/REPLACEMENT COSTS OF GREENASH TREES Total Total Total Total Check Number Date Gross Amount Discounts Late Charges Paid Amount 036557 20.Feb.2003 23,100.00 0.00 0.00 23,100.00 pK�; TDX SYST»1�iS CORPO1tATION CILEN I3KNK. �,,r ` `Iq 46,I(DJ{ Dnve �75bn,,Street /Sotith Burlmgtan VT 05403 1klancl)estej Nt.O 54153%114 Date ,Pay Amount 23,100 00*** PaY " ****TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND XX % 100 DOLLAR**** To The:, \ Order Of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 111036557110 1:01 140IS331: 3305 10 2138110 HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS September 29, 2003 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David J. Scott Director of Program Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX Systems Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Attached is our Transportation Demand Management Plan Update for October 1, 2003. Please note that our programs remain unchanged since the last filing. We continue to offer the information and programs as described in the update. Sincerely, '0 - K(w vr(- L ne A. Weaver Corporate Services & Facilities Enclosure Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2003 UPDATE • Facilities Database IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific transportation alternatives available through the CCTA as well as providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. • New Hire Orientation Package Information regarding CCTA Ride Share and Guaranteed Ride Home programs is provided to all IDX new hires in Burlington. Included in this orientation is the IDX form to sign up for the CCTA Monthly Bus Pass, subsidized at 100% by IDX. The CCTA Monthly Bus Pass sign-up form, including instructions to the employee, is also in the IDX Forms Database, providing online availability to all Burlington employees as an transportation option. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our onsite cafeteria, which is heavily subsidized, has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early, since it opens at 7:30 AM and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. • Transportation Alternatives IDX continues to provide 100% subsidy of monthly bus passes to those employees who wish to utilize this option. Communication of the transportation alternatives is handled through the New Hire Orientation and the IDX Forms Database, available to all Burlington employees. Prior to the final run of the Champlain Flyer, IDX had several employees who used this transportation alternative consistently. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171. BATTERY STREET P0. 130X 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 ,REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED 1. Kirwille. cihl Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled 1°Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 720 2112611 E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 0015011 W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 3411 W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 3311211 E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 0.5402-1507 Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by �its Duly i' Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of lj � S"-, "�= v 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: "I (Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES s ; By: �. 2 Its Duly Authorized Agent STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At `�c �i�A gity'hy)0- , in said County, this day of ��f•'�r� 2000,ersonally appeared ,s;!✓yt �%.'.lyt�az,- , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free ct and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. n /1 Before me, Notary Pu li My Commission Expires: Son172.finalversion.rea VO mocnl �''rcntrty Transfer Nx 32V&A Chn-023-, RETUIZ?i REC D-''.:. "i{ r-IZT REC"Q Ratum No, 3 f 4J f] 1 i l�,,,� i� 1 .macs _i w m all �AA Ufliil3+�' LANDSCAPING AGREEMENT 6.,j1 J© oM AGREEMENT, executed in duplicate between IDX SYSTEMS STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 CORPORATION, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY", W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, Developer's predecessor on title, BDP Realty Associates, received final subdivision approval from Municipality's Planning Commission for a planned unit development, as depicted on a Final Plat Plan entitled "BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated December 15, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. and recorded in Map Book 430, Page 82 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approvals, at its own expense, to complete all landscaping of the development site in accordance with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Developer was,.required to post a landscaping bond, which must remain in effect for three years to insure that the approved landscaping takes root and has a good chance at surviving; and WHEREAS, the City Arborist has determined that eleven (11) of the Green Ash trees planted along the IDX Drive right-of-way STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 exhibit signs of disease and/or insect infestation and need to be replaced; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby COVENANT AND AGREE as follows: 1. Municipality will remove the eleven (11) Green Ash trees identified by the City Arborist and re -plant new trees in the same locations. The new trees to be planted shall be of a similar caliper size, age and quality as the trees currently on site that are not designated for replacement. The species of the trees to be planted by the City shall be determined by the City Arborist in his sole discretion. 2. Developer shall pay the municipality the sum of $23,100.00 to compensate City for the replacement costs of the Green Ash trees. 3. City shall restore any of Developer's premises affectedi by City's entry pursuant to this Agreement to its condition prior) to such entry at City's own cost and within a reasonable time. 4. City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Developer from and against any and all claims, cause,,, act ons., damages and demands whatsoever, in law or in equity, resulting from or attributable to the City's replacement of the above - referenced trees. 5. Except as specifically modified herein, the terms and conditions of Municipality's February 9, 1999 subdivision K, approval, including any amendments thereto, shall remain.in full force and effect. 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, this day of 2003. IN PRESENCE OF: IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION (Developer) By: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Duly Authd".zed Agent (_' /'`..a 2� � v..y-{'3;'1,... �':;t• 1 •"fl i f`S-.i l„r •,6' fl At South Burli gton }n said County, this,:Z day of �rw 2003, f ;LEI'-"'" the Duly Authorized Agent of IDXYSTEMS CORPORATION personally appeared and (he/she) - acknowledged this instrument, by (him/her) sealed and subscribed, to be (his/her) free act and deed as such Duly Authorized Agent and the free act and deed of IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION. Before me, {112 a� _ Notary— ' Public My Commission Expires: �a4ua.ruj Dated at South Burlington, 2003. IN PRESENCE OF: Witnce'ss STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 RATTERY STREET P.O BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 this r " day of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT (Municipality) cILI By: Duly Auth 4ri zed 1-agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, in paid County, this jL day of 2003, ^s-t�... ��, c�- , the Duly Authorized Agent of the r"TY OF SOUTH8URLINGTON personally appeared and (he/she) acknowledged this instrument, by (him/her) sealed and subscribed, to be (his/her) free act and deed as such Duly Authorized Agent and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Before me, nLVwv�.2-- I Notary " 1liul is My Commission Expires, cL 1 .�°c' .' son256.agr STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.0 BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402.1507 II � ► � ► / 11 i TO: Chuck Hafter, City Manager ; FROM: Raymond J. Belair, Admini5tratiJe icer DATE: May 20, 2003 RE: 5treet Acceptance, IDX Drive IDX 5ystem5 Corporation has requested that the City accept IDX Drive as a City 5treet. Jay Nadeau, Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department and Bruce Hoar, Public Works Superintendent have both inspected the 5treet and the infrastructure and find everything is acceptable (see attached). The inadequacy mentioned by Jay Nadeau has since been corrected. Fleaoe ask the City Council to adopt a resolution at their next meeting to formally accept this new street. Ray Saq'Wr Freirm. Snxa- X. �-Ioar �sl&,,pvjbkl;,,(cDsover.y,,et] spnt. Friday, September 20, 2002 1:45 PM 7a, Ray J. Selair Rmad acceptance Ray, I have inspected the roads at Dorset Farms(that they, have requested to date) and IOX Drive. The roads are compieted to city stanards and can be tamed over to the city. Thanks Bruce Incoming mail is certified Mrus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http://www.gdsoft.corri). Version: 6.0.389 / Virus Database: 220 - Release Date: 09/16/2002 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT August 27, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT RE: IDX South Burlington Dear Ray; 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 The Specifications And Details For The Installation Of Water Lines And Appurtenances For All Water Distribution Systems Owned By The Champlain Water District The City Of South BurlmQton, Colchester Fire District #1 And The Village Of Jericho requires that Water System As-Builts be prepared and submitted to the CWD Retail Superintendent at the completion of the water system construction. For one year from the date the new system is placed into service, the applicant, developer/contractor will be responsible for any necessary repairs or corrections as part of the project warranty. At the end of a one-year period, an inspection will be performed by the CWD Retail Department to develop a punch list of deficiencies pertaining to the water system. Ownership by the appropriate water system as allowed by the SBWD Water Ordinance shall not take place until all deficiencies have been corrected. We have received a copy of the As-Builts for the above referenced project and performed an inspection on the area within those plans. We inspected the following infrastructure items during the course of our inspection: 1. Main line gate valves and boxes 2. Fire Hydrants and auxiliary valves 3. Service connections 4. Other appurtenances 5. General appearance The following inadequacies were found in the final inspection of this project: 1. The gate valve box cover on the gate valve located near the southeast corner of 100 IDX Drive has a cover marked "Sewer" on it. The cover must be replaced with one marked "Water". Except for the above deficiency, the South Burlington Water Department finds the water infrastructure for the above referenced location was constructed in general conformance of the previously approved plans and specifications, and that current conditions are acceptable to this department. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department ZNadeau Ja Superintendent HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS March 28, 2003 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David J. Scott Director of Program Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX Systems Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Enclosed please find the April 1 update to our Transportation Demand Management Plan. AP ease do not -CSItaLC aU 1oltiQlt le of VOV�`17� JCV vn4!viipp ca� k�ni --ll.d you any n uPstin C- _ ,. Sincerely, nne A. Weaver Corporate Services & Facilities Enclosure Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN APRIL 2003 UPDATE • Facilities Database IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific transportation alternatives available through the CCTA as well as providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. • New Hire Orientation Package Information regarding CCTA Ride Share and Guaranteed Ride Home programs is provided to all IDX new hires in Burlington. Included in this orientation is the IDX form to sign up for the CCTA Monthly Bus Pass, subsidized at 100% by IDX. The CCTA Monthly Bus Pass sign-up form, including instructions to the employee, is also in the IDX Forms Database, providing online availability to all Burlington employees as an transportation option. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our onsite cafeteria, which is heavily subsidized, has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early, since it opens at 7:30 AM and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. • Transportation Alternatives IDX continues to provide 100% subsidy of monthly bus passes to those employees who wish to utilize this option. Communication of the transportation alternatives is handled through the New Hire Orientation and the IDX Forms Database, available to all Burlington employees. Prior to the final run of the Champlain Flyer, IDX had several employees who used this transportation alternative consistently. 03/04/20e03 13:05 8028646267 01-1k.1.4 f ; p I1 F I C H C F N R E 1 T H W A 0 E A l A N D 5 c A P E A R C H i T i C T 5 TRANSMITTA L data March 3, 2003 Ra,: IDX Attn.: Janet Job No- 704 To: Zoning and Planning Office Steed. Miles Wsstot, City of South Burlhagwn P A GE 0 i Wa Trardmit! The "kM41V korfty Aemehed o Charr order Cl Prim ❑ Spetivadons ® Under seperete Cow via M Copy cef toteer D Samples ❑Memo 0 Pbnb Ll Si1C4 dr:jYA 6 ..---...�---- — Copies Date Description Janet — Attached is the invoice totals for the site masonry and site plantings for the IDX Campus. Please note that the costs reflect the work for Phase I only, In Phase ll, the parking garage and its associated landscape will be built. Phase III includes the demolition of a portion of the West Parking lot, and the construction of the 4 story West Wing and its associated bndscaping. The dogwoods were planted at the south end of the property because of the Green Mt Power line and the difficulty of planting trees under the iine with a tree Spada. Please call me if you have further questions. u Miles Weston As 0 for Approwd [3 Approved as suomi tod U Ro ubmit _ ,:opim for aQproval o Prins re� after loan m us N For your use ❑ A proved a need ❑ Submit ,_ cuplcs tew distibusion I7 For bids due CAs reg esxd Ci Rwke and renibmrc ❑ Rewrn coasted prm 0 far review and axnment M Dislpproved 7 M¢rbie Avenue $orl'Woi. VT 05+01 T am,864,001C F 902.864,8267 354 Cang,ets $treat SOston, '"IA O121C T 617.57,001C P 61',.974.0767 F uhkwQ-*z-Lhar. "t 03%04/ 2003 13: Vt5 8023646257 @3.'@d/2ee �3 12: 44 8028 )!�2 KE$SELrOUFF CORPORATION' 30 ' {WBALL .AVENUE SOUTH BURLINGTCN, VERMONT C74<W KESSEL DUFF IOX Systems Corp"flon Invoice # 23 page 1 of 1 r' M PAS 02 PAGE 02l02 Prepered: 4115M2 By, BC O F F I )E O F Fl . K E I T H W A ..) N E R L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S TRANSMITTA L Date: March 3, 2003 Re.: IDX Attn.: Janet Job No.: 704 To: Zoning and Planning Office Signed: Miles Weston City of South Burlington Cc: We Transmit: The Following Items: l Attached ❑ Change order ❑ Prints ❑ Specifications ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Samples ❑ Memo ❑x Plans ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copies Date Description 5 2/2003 24 x 36 "As -Built" Landscape Plan — IDX Campus I I I x 17 "As -Built" Landscape Plan — IDX Campus Janet — I've revised this to accurately reflect the plantings at the IDX Campus. Please feel free to call if you have comments or questions, or if you need more information for tomorrow evening's meeting. Miles Weston As checked: ❑ For Approval 0 For your use OAS requested O For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Revise and resubmit ❑ Disapproved ❑ Resubmit _ copies for approval ❑ Submit _ copies for distribution ❑ Return _corrected prints ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑ For bids due 7 Marble Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 T 802.864.0010 F 802.864.6267 354 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210 T 617.574.0010 F 617.574.0767 E ohkw@together.net !E LS.2 JS AS -BUILT PLANT LIST - , KEY I QTY. BOTANICAL NAME ICOMMON NAME SIZE DECtDUOUS TREES AR 1 Acer rubrum RED MAPLE 4 1/2'-5" CAL FP 47 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' PATMORE GREEN ASH 4 1/2'-5" CAL MB 34 Malus baccata/spp. CRABAPPLE 3 12'-5" CAL GT 40 Gleditsia triacanthos'Shademaster' HONEYLOCUST 4 1/2`-5" CAL GT 31 Gleditsia triacanthos'Shademaster' HONEYLOCUST 5'-5 1/2" CAL AS 3 Acer saccharum SUGAR MAPLE 4 1/2'-5" CAL BA 24 Betula nigra'Heptagd-- Single Stem HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH - , 2.6" 3-" CAL AC 16 Amelanchier canadensis SHADBLOW 8'-10' HGT. TC 7 1 Tilia cordata UTTLELEAF LINDEN 4"-7" CAL QP 9 1 Quercus palustris PIN OAK 4°-7" CAL PA 2 Platanus x acerifolia LONDON PLANETREE 4 1/2'-5" CAL AP 4 Acer platanoides NORWAY MAPLE 3 1/2'-7' CAL. EVERGREEN TREES PE r 6 Picea awes NORWAY SPRUCE V-100 HGT. PIN 9 Pinus nigra AUSTRIAN PINE 8'-10' HGT. PR 3 Pinus resinosa RED PINE 20'-22' HGT. PR 5 Pinus resinosa RED PINE 10'-16' HGT. DECIDOUS SHRUBS CA 1 75 1 Cornus alba REDTWIGGED DOGWOOD 5 GALJ 3'-4' HGT. VC 1 19 lViburnum cassinoides WITHEROD VIBURNUM 30"-36" HGT. EVERGRHUSHRUBS JS 1 442 Juniperus Sabina 'Broadmoor' BROADMOOR JUNIPER 18"-24" SPRD. EV 1 610 lEuonymusvegetusSarcoxie BIGLEAF WINTERCREEPER 1 18"-24" SPRD. GROUND COVER -PERENNIALS CM 354 Carex morrowi'Goldband' SEDGE 2 QT. NF 364 Nepeta faassend Walkees Low' CATMINT 2 QT. jr is NF EV LINK f I\ I I I I I I I l i 0 li o o RECEIVED MAR 0 4 2003 City of So. Burlington 1 + + + + 2 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE - - - - - - - - - -—P&ASf,J,IP14NWG _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ GL / / / / / DIUMVEMMMTOMMM / / / / /„.00p / BUILDING 100 FUTURE 3LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE ® 0 s-________________ LINK BUILDING 200 n rn<�W _1 all 0z i W OLLI H z w m raoo�ss t M LEGEW om6allumm oRAN®1M SHIIIIM ----------------- "*qD BUILDING 100 AS -BUILT PLANT LIST - 2.03 KEV JOTY. 190TANICALHAME IMMMON NAME SQE AR 1 / rubrum RED MAPLE 41/215'CAL W 47 Fmdnm penmyMniv'Pet—W PATMORE GREEN ASH 41 -5-CAL MO 34 1 Mslus ba ^pp. CRAfiAPPUE 312--5-CAL GT 40 GbdR t .th. 5hadenu HONMOUJ57T 41/2'-S' CAL GT 31 GkdR t ntho Shademrs HGNEYLOCIJST 5'-5 1/2' CAL AS 3 A¢ —haw, SUGAR MAPLE 41 '-5' CAL BA 24 Betubnigra WedUge'-Single Stem HERBAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5'-3'CAL AC 16 Am lanchler onadmsk SHADBLOW 8'-10'HGT. TC 7 Tlia mNata LMULEAE UNDEN 4'-7CAL QP 9 Qu palumns PIN OAK 447' CAL PA 2 P [anus R;ZeMia 1 LONDON PLANEW 1 41/2'-5'CAL AP 4 1 NOWAY MAPLE 1 312%7'CAL PPE c^U fiNcee abies NORWAY SPRUCE B'-iD HGT. IN: 9 Nnus ni m AUSTRIAN PINE BND HGT. PR 3 Plnus rasi_ RED NNE id-22' HGT. PR 5 Pinus resira)sa RED PINE ID-16 HG7. DEODOUS SHRUBS CA I 7S C pm 5GAL/34HGT. VC 9 1ml idu IIEDTWIIGEDW WBHEROD VIBURNUM 1 30'-36- HGi. EVERGREEN SHRUBS 46120 JEubirBsrtml BROADMOOR JUNIPER 18-24'SPRD.1EV usv i IGUWWNTERCREEPER 8-24'SPRD. GROUND COVER-PERENNXS CM 354 bra..-M G9106and' SEDGE 2 Nf 364 N faasvnil VV k. UsW CATMINT JS Nf ' LINK P O N D DORM1G VEMWION In REMAIN l101m + FOLWAN (1) S H E L B U R N E R O A D R O U T E 7 BUILDING 200 RECEIVED MAR 0 4 2003 City of So. Burlington �0 1 61 V z Z J �' W J a J E,Q C�1N V)W � III W �ZZ ~OUG Z W I PROGRESS 0 4 rn J LS.2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner DATE: February 27, 2003 CC: Tim Duff, Kesse/ Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation lDX Systems Corporation PUD Revised Final Plan Application #SD-03-07 Meeting Date: March 4, 2003 IDX Systems Corporation, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting revised final plan approval for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of a 384,400 sq. ft. general office building and a 679 space parking structure. The amendment consists of substituting 75 dogwood bushes for 28 transplanted pines along the southern property line at 40 IDX Drive. The applicant has provided two sheets detailing landscaping plans for the subject PUD. Public Works Arborist Craig Lambert has reviewed the plans and visited the site and noted that the plans do not reflect the plantings that exist on the property. Mr. Lambert had no issues with what was planted, but requested that the plans show actual plantings. I passed Mr. Lambert's comments on to the applicant's landscaping contractor. In addition, I suggested that the plan should be simplified to show only actual plantings and not previously proposed plantings that were relocated or replaced. I recommend that the DRB continue the revised final plan hearing to allow the applicant time to submit a set of landscaping plans that accurately reflects what was planted. The plans should include a species list indicating size and quantity planted. From such a list, Staff could then determine whether minimum required landscaping costs were met. uAr 10KOMen."le, i-ovable Black & White viae project oasea asses- - Montpelier,- VT. 05620- lemute. In Burlington, on Lance for up to 200 add'+- February 15, 20, 2003 9 2901 "�,) man should. be al- -• - Ciassifieds 160i Adult Cat Needs ANew tionalunit's. — PUBI �RING 2;8. Please call 985-2248. lowed to feel, and that is something I 658-3321 -tome Right A Wa : Call 9 Y Emily ASAP Call SOUTH. )INGTGN Written testimony will be Property owners who are accepted anytime up un- /1 FOUND DOG Ship will never allow my- self to take for grant- AUTOMOTIVE SALESPERSON 1802) 985.8994 DEVELOPMENT interested in applying tt March 16, 2003. REVIEW BOARD Mix, Male, Found in Under Hill Center On 2/9 ed. I love you, now & At CHAIRS should contact Paul Dettman at the Burling- February 15, 2003 To Identity Call forever. •K• Vermont's Largest Dodge I m m E Dealer Quatif (4) Living Room Chairs, J Haul Away Call After 6 ton HousingAuthorit y' The South Burlington STATE OFYERMONT (802)899-1735 clans Goss Dodge is looking for skills FOUND SKIS Pair of (802) 655-6545 — 65 Main Street, Burling- Development Review DISTRICT OF ton, Vermont 05401 (864- Board hold a CNITTENDEN, SS. Cross country skis at the Make your ad PICTURE PERFECT two candidates who have duce$; UCH free, worn, for will public 0538, extension 210) for hearing at the South Bur- Underhill State Park with aphoto a drive a succeed. Ewillxpe- ducers trance helpful, but will s room or outdoor a copy of the Implemen- lin ton City Hall, Confer- IN RE THE ESTATE OF 9 Y parking area Sunday Evenin on 2/9. Call to train the right people. Noyt light green (802) 11008 tation Plan, which more ence Room, 575 Dorset MURIEL MAY BLOMFIELD fully describes project Burlington, OF VT claim (02) 878-6764 Free Press Classifieds Goss offers aid training, paid . COUCH Street, South LATE ESSEX, based voucher program Tuesdayy and restric- Vermont FOUND: SUM OF MONEY At ellinger's Bread Co on 6583321 (salary competitivems wages solar + commission) health AVI Small, seats2. Flower guidelines March 4, 0 at 7:30 PROBATE COURT k, and a huge TE dental, a TE pattern. Torn fabric at P tions, explains the selec- P.M. to consider the foe- DOCKET NO. 30068 consider Farrell St. in So Burlingg- inventory. Both women In ry arms. Lightweight. Not tion criteria and outlines lowing: ton. Call Kevin at (80% and men are encouraged Re pretty. Free. Call (802) application requirements. 651-7197 Tues. - Sat. to apply. ing 865-0312 after 9AM. 1 . Preliminary plat NOTICE TO Personas o by. SK (2) 1 metal office Applications will be ac- application. #SD-03-04 of CREDITORS Please call or stop ape Ask for Doug Petell k (1) wood comp. cepted through March Jeffrey & Elizabeth 31, 2003. Only applica- Goldberg to a GEESE ing Goss Dodge alp, ;k COUCH fair coed. ,ESSER fair cond. subdivide tions submitted in res- 1292 acre parcel into To the creditors of the honk honk: 1485Shelburne Rd deb South Burlington VT RDIC TRACK cross ponse to this notice will five (5) lots of 2.17 acres estate of Muriel May Essex, Sweet sorrow. Employment IE F �EDE3 mtry exercise mach. be considered. (lot #1), 2.51 acres (lot Blomfield late of Feb.Feb20.7:30 m 2) 865-5134 #2), 1.73 acres (lot #3), VT. 2003 phone 658 6627. Emp FT stc ppli, CYLOPEDIAS, Com• February 1, 8,15, 1.92 acres (lot #4) and I have been appointed a PHISH TICKET oYment AUTO PARTS SALES 97( to set of Shakes ear, P NOTICE OF SELF 4.55 acres (lot #5), 232 Autumn Hill Road. personal representative 1 extra Philly ticket that Iwant totrade for Nas- ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE, E Heritage Ford's parts — rtanicas, and Music. 1802 655-3930. ( ) STORAGE LIEN SALE MALLETS BAY of the above, named ingas. Final tate. All creditors having sau Will consider other trades Call National Marketing Co. seeking key exec. dep-artment is looking for someone interested FREE PUPPY16Week 2. plat appli• SELF STORAGE claims against the estate 03-06 (802)363-1253 yy siduals r75 1 The Old Part Shepherd, Part IISHEINEBERGDRIVE White Rock oof must present -their COLCHESTER, VT 05446 claims in writing within 4 SEASON PASS TO BOL•.S9 �Hiiehcomm 20K candidatesalmust rdelaf. BAI 0 Lab, Part Collie. Free To ment, LLC to amend a of the date of TON VALLEY asking price *Support, leads PP g' able, customer service Good Home Only. Call (802)1434 -2657 months Notice is hereby ggiven Previously approved 30 th e first publication of lot single family nearly equals 2 full day Call (866)812-4672x210 or -rented, and have ex - perience in the auto an - FURNACE Oil,forced hot that the` contents -of . the ,subdivi- th(s notice: The claim Sion on 14.68 acres. self storage units listed must be presented to me lift tickets $1-00 {802) 899-4333 ANTICIPATED OPENING d/or truck parts industry. ww% air with burner, no duct below will be sold a pub. The amendment cans- at the address listed be- TICKETS FOR SALE: In return, we offer top 10; work. OIL TANK with lic auction by sealed bid. ists of allowing on -going low with a copy filed with concerts & professional •Full Time High School 9 pay (base salary plus BO01 some oil. Must take all. Call (802)288-9449 This sale is being held to cutting of vegetation wi- the register of the Pro collect un aid stora a thin the Conservation bate Court. The claim P 9 s p o r t s events i n Montreal & out of town. Math Teacher (Spring Semester -2003) commission), great be- for i nefits: 401(k) w/match, MIDDLEBURY Natural unit occupancy fees , and Open Space District, will be forever barred if It 620 636 and 654 Coun- Is not as des- (514, 878-1331 *Substitutes for all s e ss paid holidays and vaca-tional Foods Coop is planning charges and expenses of presented try Club Drive. cribed above within the www.ticketacadem com Y• levels tions, health/dental/life ties an expansion of our retail store requiring the re- sale. four month deadline. TICKETS ON US Please Call insurance), and the o ) P- billinc portunity to work and for ! rnovalof2small houses 3 Final lat appli- The entire contents of � cation #SD-0 -07 of IDX Dated January AIRWAY(2)Any 0.ScottLan at 9 BRA advance in Vermont's gook: department. at#9&9AWashin ton g St. The Co-op would like each self storage unit gg listed below will be sold, Systems Corporation to Where in The USA and Canada. Must Be ( ) 849tStr largest parts sume If loreerested, apply in sibili to donate these struc- amend a previously ape Name of Publication:. with the proceeds to be unit de- Burlington Free Press Purchased By3/5. 75HuntStreet Fairfax, VT05454 person during business 4801 tures to any organization distributed to Malletts proved planned $200 Each, $350 For hours to our Human Re- — for a relocation, com- gay Self Storage, for all velopment consisting of a 384,400 sq. ft. general First Publication Date: Both, (802) 879-9103 EOE sources Dept. or send to: P.O. pleted by Mayl, 2003. If interested, please con- accrued occupancy fees, late payment fees, sale office building and a 679 February 15, 2003 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS TELEPHONE SALES your resume Box 1100 Burlington, VT tact Glenn Lower, General Manager, at space parking structure. Second Publication Date: expenses, and all other The amendment cons- February22, 2003 V 816ttC�0e Knowledgeable automo- 05402 or apply on-line: wvuw•hentagevLeom 2 (802)388-7 76 expenses in relation to isis of substituting 75 the unit and its sale. f Probate Court dogwood bushes for 28 Address o transplanted pines along 175 Main Street Sg INy ' five enthusiast wanted for phone/technical sales position for Land Rover • M el e ****** 'ANO, Williams and Contents of each unit the southern property Burlington, VT TRACY business in Westford. 21 ins of Chicago, upright. gg may be viewed on Fe- line,401DXDrive. DESILETS, It's Must be able to diagnose ;II (802) 759-2148 bruary 21, 2003 come Signed, Bruce S. Blom- only been 7 yrs problems, iveadvice, & p g sell parts. Rovers North, DOWER WHEELCHAIRS, mencing at 9:00 a.m. field the le 11 for 6 Bedford Drive Sealed bids are to be tionseSaref le since we've 1319 Rte 128, 1600.1620 Shelburne Road scooters, hospital beds, availab submitted on the entire ons inspection the Westport, CT 06880- been together. I g Westford, VT05494. roversl�together.net South Burlington could be no cost to you contents of each self South Burlington City 530t 9 Y , Cant Walt for with primary and secon- storage unit. Bids will be Hall. dary insurance. Call toll opened immediately after February 15, 22, 2003 another 7 t o free.l-800.535.6885 9:00 a.m. viewing. The equal 14. Love LI a John Dinklage, Chairmana q highest bidder on the Lost Found storage .unit must re- South Burlington First, Bob iRUCTURE Octagon move the entire contents Development Review FOUND CAT Male, WANTED TO BUY HOCK. laps, Cupula - Topped. of the unit within 24 Board Orange Tabby with some EY TICKETS, For March Dis Repair. 13' Wide. hours after the notifica- white, neutered. Found 15th at the Bell Centre, I-14' High. Cupula is February on Jericho/Essex line. Montreal. Need 4 tick- dvageable, but to take tion of their successful must take the whole bid. Purchase must be PUBLIC NOTICE (802) 899-1426 ets. Call (802) 777-0249. ing. (802) 864-3556 made in cash and paid ELEVISION Zenith, 27° m advance of the re- cture in picture. Color the t. the contents h The Vermont D r - P the unit. A $50.00 cash partment of Agriculture, at. 2.5 years old. deposit shall be made food and Markets will e e d s picture tube. and will be returned it the hold a public hearing to ord processor, com- unit is broom cleaned. consider the licensing of ate with printer and all Malletts Bay Self Sto- Barbara and Harvey Le- )ftware. Works great. rage reserves the right to vin, P.O. Box 164, East 02)860-6241 accept or reject bids. Charleston, Vermont to uAeA Anen efer young ad;at i.°s -e lace beloved pet that Must be purebred,m ealthy, sweet-te- FIREE erered, non -barker. Req. 'oof of ownership and a �t ref. We have a good at, other refs and a le suburban home W ith no children or other � 1DEN ats. (802 (802) 872-8225 ■ • WASHER GE. White, works. Call (802) SKIDS .WASHER (Toploadploader) and DRYER. Excellent condi- tion. Make: Hotpoint Free. call(879- n Contact Bob eeters at the: 6659 1 Science Position in Physics and ,possibly Biology Guidance Counselor Special Educators Candidates must hold a valid teacher certificate, be familiar with Vermont Standards, and computer literate. Submit resume, certification, and references by March 6, 2003 to: Robert C. Levis, Headmaster Bellows Free Academy 71 South Main Street St. Albans, VT 05478 EOE it � Live in Residential Supervisor Live in Residential Specialist needed in Bellows Falls, Vermont. This position would.provide an apartment as well as a salary. This position is in Collaboration with HCRS. Looking for a mature and responsible team player to teach life skills and provide support in the com- munity. Excellent training and support from local mental health team, couples are welcome to apply. The require- ments for this position are a Bachelors degree in related field or three years experience and demonstrated leader- ship skills. Please respond to: i Edgar Greason i (� PO Box 468 j e 1 Bellows Falls, VT 05101 _ I KESSEL/DUFF CORPORATION ► $41 DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT January 31, 2003 Mr. Ray Blair, Administrative Officer Department of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Application for revision to Final Plat, IDX Systems Corporation Dear Ray: Enclosed is a completed application, drawings and application fee. As part of the completion of the phase one plantings we made substitutions and revisions to the approved planting plan based on actual site conditions and plant availability. Please note there are actually 13 more plants than are shown on the original planting plan for phase one. Additionally, we substituted 75 dogwood bushes for 28 transplanted pines along the southern property line for the following reasons: The location and height of the existing power lines would not allow for the safe operation of a tree spade. The slope of the location was problematic for transplanted pines and there was not a sufficient quantity and quality of pines to transplant. Sincerely, Timothy A. Duff Vice President Cc: Office of H. Keith Wagner Peter Smichenko, IDX 30 KIMBALL AVENUE, SUITE 101 • SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 862-7600 FAX: (802) 862-1932 • Website: www.kesseldutf.com LEGEND � < PRE-EXISTING TREE OPLANTED TREE /j %e TRANSPLANTED(tr.),REYISED/RELOCATED TREE PLANTING ORIGINAL PROPOSED TREE LOCATION SHRUB BED FOR PLANT UST SEE SHEET L4 LEGEND PRE-EXISTING TREE OPLANTED TREE TRANSPLANTEDftr.NREVISED/RELOCATED TREE PLANTIN KW�® AS -BUILT PLANT L1S-f 12.02 G ��QTY BOTANICAL NAME =OMMON NAME I DEOWWSTREES P_ AR A<r 7 ub m TpEO MAPLE FP 47 F a pM yl a C W— C PATMDRE GREEN ASH _ 1 !AS M ba atahpp CRABAPPLE _ __ __ —�70 Gledtsu triarantho Sh demister �HONEYlOCUS _ GT I AS B A< AAmdhar SUGAR MAPLE I_ BA 13 IBeWI loa WHITE LARCH I C iT1. arKhier �anad nsis SHADBIOW — — --1 TC aTI cordala UTTIEIEAf UNOEN PIN QP ! 13 Q M< 5 palu5t OAK PA --7 ., %atarlu xacenblW iLONDON RANETREE .. EVERGREEN TREES ' RE . 6 r 4N LL 73 �PInIu ig a_ _jAUSTRIAN%NE 10 % nou _ RED, PINE DEOD_DUS SHftBS L�CA 75 ICAr falbi REDTWIGGED DOGWG ID r1 yC t1 Vb ca ad WITHEROD VIBURNUAa EVERGREEN SHRUBS ROADMF WOIM)DNIIPEF5 T EO VEBGARQEEPR _ _ GROUND COVERPERENN_IALS I CM I Calex owi Itlb d SEDGE _. _, : NF _lNepeU faaifen alJ N:ers low CA1MNaf LI WE I c 1 TR. 37tl. B I 7B ij � li�llf'i" ,►I, � I i I I I Milan N C I 4 <� !Q 4 F a W _ • § W=u • �tsssR) << ads ii It xt � I g ggy�ygg�g f� ,6y�eS@ Epi ap g Q PROGRESS ''I Y /0' I\ y' Z c� C W 7 Lu 0- 6 Ln Zo it �mz Big ig LS.2 TR. 37tl. B I 7B ij � li�llf'i" ,►I, � I i I I I Milan N C I 4 <� !Q 4 F a W _ • § W=u • �tsssR) << ads ii It xt � I g ggy�ygg�g f� ,6y�eS@ Epi ap g Q PROGRESS ''I Y /0' I\ y' Z c� C W 7 Lu 0- 6 Ln Zo it �mz Big ig LS.2 DE,PA R T 1V-=TdT 0 F ?'I-t HINT ?�1G ,�s 1 1-1 0 DT 1 I G v 75 D0RSET S T 1 EE 1 iOt = S -711" i GTO , VEF12/1UN-171 05403 (802) 846-4106 r_L), (802) 8416-4101 Permit T1urnbe: SD-_O 7 Al, ,n - n 31aa-dor requested on this application must be :,ompleted in fail. Failure to provide the requested infomatien either on this applicatioii form or on the plans Vvill result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before tape Djevel•opinent Revie-,v Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent inf6rrnation only. t) R OF RECORD (1\Taii,e as shownon deed- mailing address, phone ai d fa,: #) IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington IT 05403 Phone: 864-1758 Fax: 862-8098 %} T OC. �TION OF LAST ST REC-GRDED DEED (Book and page 4) 501/518 and 501/513 �) Al'l✓ MANT (Nai-ne, mailing address, phone and fw,� 4,) IDX Systems Corporation ( see above) �^ Kesst'cm A.", C t TT'AC�T PERSOi k'1T, arne, mailirg address, phoiie and Tax #1 �IIM Dot i 86;4 %boo X 18 Peter Smichenko IDX Systems Corporation (see above) ki k, 36 1 4 e i-1 h Uca�lvle f s369 001D - >! O Idyea�fe. 4rc4d'W South Ica r l� dar-�� v i 00 5l iPROJEKT S RE E i ADDRESS: 1400 Shelburne Rd. & 40 IDX Drive 1400 Shelb a Rd.:1500-1540-01400C b) TAX, PARCEL -ID 4 (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 40 IDX Dr.X 1 0-1540-01500C No 7_; PROJECT LESCIRTTIO d a) EX-Isting Uses on Property (including description and sire air each eparate use) Applicant requests approval of actual landscaping along southern boundary consisting of deciduous plantings in lieu of pine trees depicted on final plat as approve b) Proposed Uses on property (inclade description and size of each new use and existing uses to e) Tito l building square footage on prouerbr (proposed.1build1mp and existing hulidirigs to remaln) d> T?eight €�f bidding & number of T,00rs (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain. specify i basennent and mezzanine) :e) Number of residential units (if applicable, rear units and existing :hits to remain) '1 ~�ggt?6ef!-Jc i y .!%icy—ces .r?T .c+�'".,L',A an. ?' ciicies3 \t osm ig and }JSi:U�i.��..ea�A., „9J ie 1-3 c, -`!else s rih n-40=1c'k '��i3�',�eis �• Jf L1 er (i st an ether Ld0.or a can erEnen6 to this ap lbcar*on riot s�ieci!lcnn rt� ie�Lies id.�.. alcove, note Oven ay Districts awe applicable): ) 1 YCDT C011iii- A- E a) Building: E:dst, g % P-'roycsdd b). Overall Corm ding, pagdng� onside stomp, etc; Existing % Propose ad % c) Front yard (aloe each sweet)' E-dstin.g ' o Proposed % CG ST ESMAA�T S �? Other site €=,r o-"wT tnts '(Please h -with ;oat): ) EST = ` TETIC re mge l� t a c for e _property (in and oast;: ,) A.Nf. Peak boor Lor entire pproper-y (in and out): P,-AdL IP e —ak 1h0-a r fbr e n& 3—ope:�1 (Ia aud i PEAK -HOURS OF OP_� , TION: PEAK D-h71-S QF 0PE--R7101,T: ES A = PROJECT CONTP :E' I ON D TE: PLANS plans shall be submitted,,vhich shows the inFormation listed on —Exhibit A attach d. Five (? regsiar size conies and one iced copy ; I I" x a 7") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application Bee shall be }paid to the City at the time ibmittng the Ural plat application (see E : - it A). , 1 'been - Is 'fy� that all the mationn�,quested as pa: of this application has be- sJornittedandi i Ilereby ctrtl info accurate to the best of any I'moviledge. SIR JRE OVAPPEIC7 L SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Peter Smichenko for IIDX Systems Corporation 04- t onto. 3 an -4 %-r-W3 Do not wnxt� below this lin� DATE OF SUM/flSSION: 0 IAII 1 have r,-viewed this final plat application and find it to be: ❑ Lncornruletep Q or Designet. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555LFIRMSPF.COM) EDWARD G. ADRIAN ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE(ailFIRMSPF.COM) JOSEPH S. McLEAN WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-9119 TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N-Y.) C l� y October 9, 2002 Raymond J. Belair�� City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Utility Easement Dear Ray: Enclosed please find an execution copy of a Utility Easement prepared by Molly Lebowitz on behalf of IDX along with a plan entitled "Existing Conditions Site Plan Along Proposed New GMP Electrical Line Corridor". The utility easement lists IDX and the City of South Burlington as Grantors of the easement to Green Mountain Power for an underground power line which crosses, in part, IDX Drive. I do not know whether the City Council has considered/approved the conveyance of this easement. Also, Bill Szymanski should probably review the plan to determine if there are any possible conflicts with City utilities. Please give me a call with any comments and questions. Thank you. Sincerel �.w Timothy M. Eustace THE/jp Enclosure son4961.cor KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That IDX Systems Corporation, a Vermont corporation having a place of business at 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter called "IDX"), and the City of South Burlington, a municipal corporation situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (hereinafter called "City") (IDX and City are hereinafter collectively called "GRANTOR"), in consideration of One Dollar paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby give, grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Green Mountain Power Corporation, a Vermont corporation having a place of business at 163 Acorn Lane, Colchester, Vermont (hereinafter called "GRANTEE") and to its successors and assigns, the exclusive and perpetual right and easement to lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, repair, maintain, replace, patrol and remove underground cables, lines, and appurtenances (hereinafter called the "facilities"), for the transmission of high and low voltage electric current and for telecommunication use, under and across a strip of land in South Burlington, Chittenden County, State of Vermont being (i) a portion of the land and premises conveyed to IDX by Warranty Deed of BDP Realty Associates dated April 19, 2002 and recorded in Volume 501, Page 519 of the City of South Burlington land records which land and premises are subject to an Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates in favor of City dated June 15, 2000 and recorded in Volume 477, Page 387 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and (ii) a portion of the land and premises conveyed to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed of Dennis L. Blodgett and Gerald C. Milot dated November 14, 1988 and recorded in Volume 475, Page 543 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, said land and premises being commonly known as IDX Drive (f/k/a Holmes Road Extension) ("GRANTOR's Property"). Said line to enter GRANTOR'S Property along the northerly boundary of said land and premises with lands n/f of BDP Realty Associates as acquired by BDP Realty Associates by Warranty Deed of Dennis I. Blodgett dated August 28, 1990 and recorded in Volume 297, Page 623 of the City of South Burlington land records and going in a generally southerly direction to the southerly boundary of IDX Drive. Said easement area is twelve feet (12') wide and is is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "Existing Conditions Site Plan Along Proposed New GMP Electrical Line Corridor" prepared by Lamoureux & Dickinson dated January 25, 2002 and recorded in Map Slide of the City of South Burlington land records (the "Plan")" (the easement area depicted on the Plan being hereinafter called the "Easement Area"). In addition, GRANTOR gives, grants, bargains, sells and conveys unto GRANTEE a temporary easement during the construction phase only with its easterly edge on the westerly boundary of the Easement Area with a width of eight (8) feet. Said temporary easement expires sixty (60) days after initial construction begins. Upon completion of the installation and subsequent repairs and/or modifications, GRANTEE shall restore the surface of the ground to a condition the same or better as originally found. Included herein is the perpetual right and easement from time to time without further payment therefor to clear and keep cleared the Easement Area and to renew, replace, add to and otherwise change the facilities and each and every part thereof, and the locations thereof within the Easement Area, and to access the Easement Area to and from the adjoining lands and to pass over GRANTOR'S Property for access to and from the Easement Area for all the above purposes and the removal of the facilities. GRANTOR hereby covenants that it will not erect or permit any building or any other structures or trees or bushes to be planted or change the grade, fill or excavate within the Easement Area which, in the judgment of GRANTEE, might interfere with the proper operation and maintenance of the facilities. GRANTOR and GRANTEE acknowledge that the portion of the Easement Area located on IDX Drive will be paved. OH/UG Line Fxt. / Easement It is agreed that the facilities shall remain the property of GRANTEE, and that GRANTEE shall pay all taxes assessed thereon. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted easements and rights, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereunto belonging, unto and to the use of GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, forever. And GRANTOR hereby for GRANTOR, its successors and assigns, covenants with GRANTEE, its successors and assigns that GRANTOR is lawfully seized in fee simple of the granted premises, and that GRANTOR has good right to sell and convey the same as aforesaid, and will WARRANT and DEFEND the same to GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons except for holders of easements and rights -of -way of record. There is also hereby released and conveyed by the undersigned all homestead rights and other statutory rights or interests in the easements herein conveyed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, IDX Systems Corporation has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this day of , 2002. IIMIMoto 90cilia e[y ela Witness STATE OF COUNTY OF IDX Systems Corporation By: L.S. Duly Authorized Agent On the _____day of 2002, personally appeared , duly authorized agent ofIDX Systems Corporation, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of IDX Systems Corporation. [Seal] Before me, 2 Notary Public Commission Expires: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of South Burlington has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this day of , 2002. IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF COUNTY OF City of South Burlington By: L.S. Duly Authorized Ah ent On the day of , 2002, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of the City of South Burlington, signer and sealer of the foregoing written instrument and acknowledged the same to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Before me, [Seal] SAPartners\LEBOWITZ\IDX\gmp easements\Easement City of South Burlington_IDX_easterly.wpd OH/UG Line Ext. / Easement Notary Public Commission Expires: VEI ONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TA,,-.- TURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1409 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) A SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO.(S) OR FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NO. IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05402 03-0270075 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 03-6002712 B BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO.(S) OR FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NO. Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane, Colchester, VT 05446 03-0318165 C PROPERTY LOCATION (Address in full) D DATE OF CLOSING IDX Drive, South Burlington E INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED V2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE 7. ® EASEMENT/ROW 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED % INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER F LAND SIZE (Acres or fraction G SPECIAL FACTORS: HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BEEN CONVEYED X NO YES thereof) WAS SALE BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS X NO YES-'I'ATF"kEL9rM=P FINANCING: ❑ CONVENTIONALJBANK ❑ OWNER/FINANCING ❑ OTHER H BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ FARM BUILDINGS 9. ❑ STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH (INSERTNt m) DWELLING UNITS 10. ❑ OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME YEAR MAKE SER. NO. 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH (M M NUMBER) UNITS TRANSFERRED CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE I PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL� 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. OTHER road J PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL road / utility easement - DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. OTHER WAS PROPERTY PURCHASED BY TENANT NO YES DOES BUYER HOLD TITLE TO ANY ADJOINING PROPERTY NO YES K CURRENT USE VALUE PROGRAM: IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE AGRICULTURAL AND MANAGED FOREST LAND USE VALUE PROGRAM CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. ❑ YES ® NO L IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N, AND O BELOW. NI TOTAL N PRICE PAID FOR O PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID PERSONAL PROPERTY $ REAL PROPERTY $ STATE TYPE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE, PLEASE DESCRIBE: frly=$5I'0; no consideration paid ' MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES P TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS $6.25 Q DATE SELLER ACQUIRED _4119/01 R IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 1 (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT TOWN/NUMBER DATE OF RECORD RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. LIST VALUE $ GRAND LIST YEAR OF PARCEL ID NO. SIGNED CLERK GRAND LIST CATEGORY DATE FORM PT-1 (8/00) RATESCHEDULE Tax on Special Rate Property a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed $100,000) (See instructions)................................................. 1. a. $ 0 b. Value of property enrolled in current use program............................................................................. b. $ c. Value of qualified working farm........................................................................................... C. $ d. Add Lines 1 a, band c.................................................................................................... d. $ e. Tax rate.............................................................................................................. e. $ 0.005 f. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line ld by Line le................................................................... f $ 0 Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line O on front of return ......................................... ....................................... 2. a. $ 500.00 b. Enter amount from Line 1 d of Rate Schedule above ................................................... . ........................ b. $ 0 c. Subtract Line 2b from Line 2a............................................................................................. c. $ d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................. d. .0125 e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2c by Line 2d.................................................................. e. S 6 .25 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines if and 2e and enter here and on line P on front of return ............................................................. 3. $ 6.25 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Seller(s) certify as follows: A. That they have investigated and disclose,' to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, if any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(s) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer is in compliance with or is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number 1 Number of acres b. Parcel retained: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office in your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 34.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real property and any development thereon is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from instructions) b E. That this transfer does not result in a partition or subdivision of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form RW-171 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): 01. Under penalties of perjury, seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. 112. Buyer(s) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes in advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form RW-171.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE IDX Systems Corporation Green Mountain Power Corporation By: City of South Burlington By: Preparer's Signature Prepared by Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C. Preparer's Address 209 Battery Street, P.O. Box 988, Burlington, VT 05401 Buyer's Representative Tel. (Print or Type) Preparer makes no certification as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. South Burlington Street Department 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL: (802) 658-7961 OFFICE 104 LANDFILL RO To: Ray Belair CC: Bruce Hoar From: Craig Lambert Date: 11/8/02 Re: Tree Planting on IDX and Green Mountain Dr. Trees planted on IDX and Green Mountain Dr. as part of the IDX Dr. construction project were inspected on 9/27/02, to assess their condition prior to acceptance of the road. Eleven Green Ash exhibit signs of crown dieback and trunk borer infestation and are in fair to poor condition. I met with Peter Smichenko of IDX on 10/09/02, and he would prefer to pay a replacement fee as opposed to replanting. Replanting cost for a 5-6 inch caliper Green Ash is $2100 for a total cost of $23,100. This is a price quoted by North Country Landscaping, and is in line with prices quoted by Four Seasons, and New England Nursery Sales. Post- U Fax Note To 7671 Date E 1 F' From C Pages Co./Dept. Phone # Co' L Fax # Phone # Fax # Y { IDX DRIVE (s4 N 0 L vi m Z 0000 41 � y10 0 P Owl 00 p 0 ""�" A s a GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE StreetiD Address: Location: rreeSpd DIAMETER I HEIGHT I CONDITION hsectConj Other Conflicts: Removal PruneDW PruneRaise PruneCorrect I Comments: Date: Green Mountain Dr 40 G GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE leader 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 40 F PIO 0-3 10-19 Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, some dieback, behind IDX 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 40 E NOM 0-3 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, behind IDX 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 40 D LLL 4-6 20-29 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, v-crotches,behind IDX 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 40 NOM 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE tree lights need removal 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Dr 40 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE crown dieback(20%), borers FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000,codominant leader,behinit IDX, 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 40 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE crown dieback(25%) FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, codominant leader,behind IDX,replace 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 G COT 16-20 50+ Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 F cot 11-15 50+ Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 E COT 11-15 50+ Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 D COT 16-20 50+ Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 C cot 11-15 50+ Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 B COT 21-25 50+ Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE Lightning scar 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 55 A COT 36-40 50+ Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE Splits to 3leaders @3ft. 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 75 D NOM 11-15 30-39 Good FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE FALSE 02/26/2002 i Mountain Or 75 C WHP 16-20 30-39 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 02/26/2002 Mountain Or 75 B CRA 7-10 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Double leader, v-crotch 02/26/2002 '"Wn' Mountain Or 75 A NOM 11-15 30-39 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 F NOM 7-10 20-29 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Root collar buried 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 E HON 7-10 20-29 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE Next to sign 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 iQ GRA 4-6 10-19 Poor FALSE crown dieback(70%),borers lgii& FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, codominant leader,replace 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 C NOM 4-6 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000, remove xmas tree lights 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 B GRA 0-3 10-19 Fair FALSE crown dieback(15%) FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE planted 2000. codominant leader 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 85 A LLL 0-3 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000 0226/2002 Green Mountain Or fans C NOM 0-3 10-19 Good FALSE Crack FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Or farm B PIO 4-6 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE planted 2000 02/26/2002 Green Mountain Dr farm JL GRA 4-6 10-19 Fair TRUE Borers. crown dieback(20.%) UK. FALSE FALSE TRUE Planted 2000 09/27/2002 Green Mountain Or 30 A NOM 11-15 30-39 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE V-crotch. East of drive 02/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 18 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 17 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/26/2002 IDX Or 40 16 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Or 40 15 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader,poor form FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 0926/2002 IDX Or 40 14 GRA 4-6 30-39 Fair FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE crown dieback(10 %) 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 13 GRA 4-6 30-39 Fair FALSE codominant leader FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 12 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader.poor form FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 09/2612002 IDX Dr 40 p� GRA 4-6 20-29 Poor FALSE Topped Tf- FALSE FALSE FALSE replace 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 j�► GRA 4-6 30-39 Poor FALSE crown dieback(45%) TFVU FALSE FALSE FALSE replace 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 9 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE FALS TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 8 gra 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader, poor form FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 7 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr 40 6 PIO 4-6 20-29 Good FALSE Minor dieback FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/26/2002 IDX Dr map) 17 PIO 0-3 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE Potential codominant leader 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 16 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 15 PIO 4-6 20-29 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE train for structure 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 14 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader, poor forth FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 13 PIO 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE Termindl dieback FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 12 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE codominant leader FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE Some dieback,poor forth 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) 11 PIO 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE Train 09/25/2002 IDX Dr map) ir GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair TRUE crown dieback(30%) -FA* TRUE FALSE TRUE codominant leader, marginal tree. 09/25/2002 �r map) 9 GRA 4-6 10-19 Poor FALSE crown dieback(40%) TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE replace 09/25/2002 1350 V GRA 4-6 20-29 Poor TRUE borers TRUEE, FALSE FALSE FALSE crown dieback(30%) 09/25/2002 �.w► 1350 7 GRA 4-6 20-29 Poor TRUE borers TRt rF FALSE FALSE FALSE codominant leader. crown dieback ,replace 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 6 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 5 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 4 BLS 4-6 10-19 Good FALSE Future street lig ht conflict FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 3 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 2 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 1350 1 VAC FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 40 5 GRA 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE crown dieback FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE codominant leader 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 40 4 PIO 4-6 20-29 Fair FALSE Terminal dieback FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE codominant leader 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 40 "ia - GRA 4-6 20-29 Poor TRUE Dieback in crown(25%) TRULF FALSE FALSE FALSE 09/252002 IDX Dr 40 2 PIO 4-6 20-29 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE FALSE Remove xmas tree lights 09/25/2002 IDX Dr 40 1 LLL 0-3 10-19 Good FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE 09/25/2002 I— r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO DEPARTMENT OF PILANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 30, 2002 Timothy A. Duff Vice President Kesel/Duff Corporation 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 101 5. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Kc: IN Landscaping Dear Mr. Duff. I am in receipt of your letter of December 13, 2002 and the as -built landscaping plan. The plan indicates that a significant change was made along the south boundary line. Specifically, the substitution of 75 dogwood bushes for 28 transplanted pine trees. Staff does not have the authority to approve significant changes to an approved plan. A Final Plat application will have to be submitted to the DRD to request approval for the changes made. This approval will have to be made prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincer�l ,�' Raymond J. Delair Administrative Officer KESSEL/DUFF CORPORATION ► ,DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT December 13, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX landscaping Dear Ray: Enclosed is an as -built plan prepared by the landscape architects, Office of H Keith Wagner. I have met on site with the landscape architect and the installer to verify the field changes from the previously approved plan. You will note there are 37 plants of various sizes and types deleted from their original locations and either relocated or substituted. The deleted number does not include those plants indicated to be installed in phase two of the site plan. There are 50 plants indicated as revised or relocated for a net gain of 13 from the original plan for phase one. These numbers do not take into account the most significant change to the plan. 28 transplanted pines were deleted from the southern property line because the sloping condition of planting area would not allow for the use of a tree spade for transplanting. In lieu of the trees, IDX planted 75 dogwood bushes. Please review the enclosed as -built plan and contact me if everything is in order so that I may complete the certificate of occupancy application. Sincerely, Timothy A. Duff Vice President Cc: Office of H Keith Wagner Peter Smichenko, IDX 30 KIMBALL AVENUE, SUITE 101 • SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 862-7600 FAX: (802) 862-1932 • Website: www.kesselduff.com X/f 12!23/2002 MON 13:a1 FAX 5020009119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER STITZEL., PAGF & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PI BATTLRY STREET P O. BOX 1507 BLJR.LINGTON, vHRP4ONT 05att�'-1507 (002) 660-255$ (VOICErIDD) .;TrIV _N F STITZEL. FAX (8021660-2552 ar (*0-9119 Pant R_ PAGE- E 1 AIL(FIRM2555®FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERTE. PLL'TCHER WRIT.ER'S PAWL JEUVACIRWIRMSPF.COM) IOSEPH S. WLEAN WRITER'S FAX (802) 660.9119 nmo7 1Z' M. EUSTA E (•ALNOADW =. 1NR,v, FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Date: December 23, 2002 To: Raymond J. Belair Fax: 846-410I Sender: 'Timothy M. Eustace a001 AMANDA 5Z L.APPERTY w,%,;1Rt; 6. ADRIAi You should receive 11 Page(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call (802) 660.2555. MESSAGE Transmitted herewith is the e-mail, Landscaping Agreement and License Agreement This messugc is intended only for the ace cf toe addressee and rttsy contain in*wrnadan that is privileged and confidcrtiai. Fyou arc not the ,ntanded Tvcipirnt, you arc bereby notified that .4q dissemination of this comrnunication is strictly probfbitcd. If you have received ibis ,:onvnotN4ation in orrm, p6ty notify us im ysuNsLe,y by telephone ifl02-663XSS). Thank you. 1Z/Z3rsoos MON 13:JZ rj%A, OOZ0099118 5TITZEiL rAur a rLETi:n=r �003 LANDSCAPING IxGREEENT TKIS AGREEr1ENT, executed in duplicate between IDX SYSTEMS -CRFC1tATION, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER", and the CT"_'Y OF' SOUTH BUTRLINGTON, VERMONT, hereinafter referred to as "MUNICIPALITY", W I T N E S S E T H; WHEREAS, by ;written decision dated February 9, 1999, Developer's predecessor on title, BDP Realty Associates, received final subdivision approval from Municipality's Planning Commission for a planned unit development, as depicted on a Final Plat Plan entitled "8DP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated December 15, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999, prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. and recorded in Map Book 430, Fage 82 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; WHEREAS, Developer is regr,ired by said approvals, at its own expense, to complete all landscaping of the development site in accordance with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Developer was required to post a landscaping bond, which must remain in effect for tlr'ee years to insure that the approved landscaping takes root and has a good chance at surviving; and 12/23/2002 MON 13:33 FAX 30266019119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER1 11004 from or attributable tc the City's replacement of the above - referenced trees. S. This Agreement shall be binding upon the partiee he-reto and their respec,.ive heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, this day of 2002. IN PRESENCE OF: IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION (Developer) By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COTRITY OF CHITTENUEN, SS. At South Burlington, in said County, this day of 2002, , the Duly Authorized Agent of IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION personally appeared and (he/she) acknowledged this instrument, by (him/her) sealed and subscribed, to be (his/her) free act and deed as such Duly Authorized Agent and the free act and deed of TDX SYSTEMS CORPORA.TICN. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires! Dated at South Burlington, this day of 2002. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness By: 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT (Municipality) Duly Authorized Agent U 1Z,'Z3/Z0QZ MON 13:33 FA3 B029809119 3TITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER �10Q3 STATE OF VEPY40NT C'OL'NTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS, At South Burlington, in said County, this day of t 2002, , the Duly kuthorized Agent of the CITY OF SOUTH SURLTNGTON personally appeared and (ne/she) acknowledged this instrument, by (him/her) sealed and subscribed, to be (his/her) free act and deed as such Duly Authorized Agent ana the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BUR.LINGTON. son29&.aqr Before me, taotary Public My Ccmmission Expires: 4 12/23/2002 MON 13;34 FAX 5026608118 3TITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER �1006 AFT LICENSE ACRFEi1 U,NI This License Agreement is made this day of . 2002, by and between the City of South Burlington, with its principal offices located at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 (City), and the Greer Mountain power Corporation, a Vermont Corporation having its principal offices located at 163 Acorn Lane, Colchester, Vermont (GMP). WfffiREAS, the GMP wishes to obtain a license to lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, repair, maintain, replace and remove underground cables, lines and appurtenances (hereinafter called the "Facilities"), for the transmission of high and low voltage electric current for telecommunication use, under and across the IDX Drive right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City has approved the placement of the Facilities within the JDX Drive right-of-way, as shown on a plan entitled "Existing Conditions Site Flan Along Proposed New GMP Electrical Line Corridor" prepared by Lamoureaux & Dickinson, dated January 25, 2002, last reviscd , and recorded in Map Volume _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records (the "Plan"); NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of 19 V.S.A. § 1111. the City does hereby grant to GMP a license for the purpose of laying, constructing, reconstructing, operating, repairing, maintaining, replacing and removing underground cables, lines and appurtenances within the IDX Drive right-of-way as follows: 1. LICENSE. The City hereby giants to GMP a license to lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, repair, maintain, replace and remove underground cables, lines and appurtenances, within the IDX Drive right-of-wav in the location shown on the above -referenced Plan. 2, OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE. GMP shall own and install the Facilities, and shall have the right and responsibility to maintain, repair, and replace the Facilities as 12"28%E002 MON 13.34 FAX S020609119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER &21007 needed. GNIF agrees to kcop the Facilities in good order and repair and maintain said Facilities in a safe operating conditioln- 3. NOTICE OF WORK V'VTTRTN iflk T)RIVE 1iTGHT-OF'WAY. GMP shall provide reasonable advance notice to the on- duty dispatcher at the South Burlington Police Department on Dorset Street before commencing any work to install, repair or replace any Facility improvements that will, during the performance of such work, interfere with or pose a threat to the public's use of the IDX Drive right-of-way. 4. RESTORATION OF PREMMSE& GIMP further agrees that any prernises affected by its entry pursuant to this License Agreement shall be restored to their prior condition at GN2's own cost within a reasonable time. 5. LIC14a NSE TERM. This License Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of thirty (30) years, beginning on _� 2002, and ending on _, 2032, and shall be binding upon the transferees of any interest assigned, conveyed, or otherwise transferred by either party. At least one year before the date of expiration as set forth above, the City and UVIP agree to renegotiate for renewal of this License Agreement. 6. MQDIFICATTON OR RELOCATION OF )FACIILITIES. GMP agrees to modify and/or relocate the Facilities if, after installation, the City Council determines, in a reasonable exercise of its discretion, that the Facilities substantially interfere with the City's use, operation and maintenance of the right-of-way or its underlying infrastructure. Prior to making such determination, the City shall provide GNT with written notice of its intent to consider said matter and shall, if requested by GNIP, meet with a duly authorized agent of GMP to discuss the options concerning the modification and/or relocation of the Facilities. 7, CONSIDERATION. In addition to the consideration already stater, GMP shall pay to the City the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is 12!E3,zUOY MON 13:30 FAX 5020009119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER f]U09 hereby acknowledged. S. 15DEl JFlr ATION. GMP agrees to indemni fY and hold harmless the City from and against any and all claims, causes, actions, damages and demands whatsoever, in law or in equity, resulting from or attributable to the construction, maintenance or presence of the facilities within the 1DX Drive right-of-way. 9. INSURANCE. GMT sha11, at its own cost and expense, obtain and maintain in continuous effect a policy of commercial general liability insurance with limits of not less than one million dollars combined single limit for property damage liability and bodily injury liability, and coverage for workers' compensation in accordance with Vermont law. GMP shall submit, at the time of signing this License Agreement, proof of the above -referenced insurance coverages. GMP shall provide the City proof of such insurance on an annual basis. On each tenth. (1(Y) anniversary of this License, City may, in a reasonable exercise of its discretion, require GNP to adjust these insurance limits to account for inflation and/or other factors affecting coverage limits for liability insurance. 10. MISCELLANEQUS. The failure of either party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the terms, conditions, or covenants herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights or remedies that that party may have and shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default in the terms, covenants, or conditions herein contained. This License Agreement shall be governed by the laws of State of Vermont. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by a writing signed by authorized officials of both parties. 11. NOTICES. Any written notice required to be given by the tennis of this License shall be deemed duly served if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, If to CITY: City of South Burlington ATTN: City Manager 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 3 12%23,2002 MON 13:35 FAX 3028509119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER 1 1 Z009 With a copy to: Stitzel, Page &: Fletcher, P.C. 171 Battery Street PO Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 If to GMP: Ciraen Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT With a copy to: Either party may change its notice address by written notice to the other party. 12. RECORDING. This License Agreement shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. IN N�TINESS HEREOF, this License Agreement has been executed in duplicate, each of which shall rank as an original, as of the day and year first written above. City of South Burlington, Authorized Agent Green. Mountain mower Corporation Authorized Agent STATE OF VER!VfON'T CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Witness V6ritness At _ , in said County, this _ day of; December, 2002, personally appeared Charles Hafrter, South Burlington City Manager, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed, and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Before me: _ Notary Public 4 12,'23-2002 MON 1.3:38 FAX 8020009118 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHEF z('110 STATE OF VERMON'1' CHITTBN-DEN COUNTY, SS. At _ , in said County, this day of December, 2002, personally appeared _ , duly authorized agent of Green Mountain Power Corporation; and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed, and. the free act and deed of Green Mountain Power Corporation. Before me: E:1W PDOCIAGR\.son2S"7.agr Notary Public Box HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS September 9, 2002 Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Directional Sign Plan for 40 IDX Drive Dear Ray: Enclosed please find a Directional Sign Plan for the 40 IDX Drive campus, dated September 9, 2002. There are four pages composed of the following: (i) site plan showing general proposed locations (Page 1 of 4), (ii) detail showing three Directional Signs (Page 2 of 4), (iii) detail showing an Incidental Sign (Page 3 of 4) and (iv) detail showing several additional Incidental Signs (Page 4 of 4). We have worked hard to make our proposed Directional and Incidental Signs consistent with the City's signage ordinance and have chosen materials and finishes which are consistent with our campus. We have a mock-up of an Incidental Sign if you are interested in reviewing it with us. Thank you for your assistance. After more than a year we are pleased that we seem to have reached a consensus with the City of South Burlington regarding both our existing and proposed signage. Please contact me with any questions or concerns you may have regarding this request. Sincerely, Peter S. Smichenko Director Corporate Services and Facilities Enclosure CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com Aia-'j "Mr-M _11M F'T'awm si'_'Ce X. i'"]oar Sent. F-diday, September 20, 2CO27 1,45 'PM To: 5Rlay J. Setair Subject: Roadaccaptance ATMOGOO.Mm Ray, I have inspected the roads at Dorset Farms(that they have requested to date) and lUt' On;ve. T;ie roads are Oompieied, to city stanards and can be turned over to the city. Thanks Bruce Incoming mail is ,certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (hftp://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0..3891 Virus Database: 220 - Release Date: 09/16/2002 SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT August 27, 2002 Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT RE: IDX South Burlington Dear Ray; 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 864-4361 Fax: (802) 864-0435 The Specifications And Details For The Installation Of Water Lines And Appurtenances For All Water Distribution Systems Owned By The Champlain Water District The City Of South Burlington, Colchester Fire District #1 And The Village Of Jericho requires that Water System As-Builts be prepared and submitted to the CWD Retail Superintendent at the completion of the water system construction. For one year from the date the new system is placed into service, the applicant, developer/contractor will be responsible for any necessary repairs or corrections as part of the project warranty. At the end of a one-year period, an inspection will be performed by the CWD Retail Department to develop a punch list of deficiencies pertaining to the water system. Ownership by the appropriate water system as allowed by the SBWD Water Ordinance shall not take place until all deficiencies have been corrected. We have received a copy of the As-Builts for the above referenced project and performed an inspection on the area within those plans. We inspected the following infrastructure items during the course of our inspection: 1. Main line gate valves and boxes 2. Fire Hydrants and auxiliary valves 3. Service connections 4. Other appurtenances 5. General appearance The following inadequacies were found in the final inspection of this project: 1. The gate valve box cover on the gate valve located near the southeast corner of 100 IDX Drive has a cover marked "Sewer" on it. The cover must be replaced with one marked "Water". Except for the above deficiency, the South Burlington Water Department finds the water infrastructure for the above referenced location was constructed in general conformance of the previously approved plans and specifications, and that current conditions are acceptable to this department. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, South Burlington Water Department AJaydeau Superintendent \. iYX@ HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS September 19, 2002 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex )unction, VT 05452 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David Scott Director of Project Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX System Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Enclosed please find the October 1, 2002 update to our Transportation Demand Management Plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me on 802-859-4018 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ✓�✓ Lynne A. Weaver Administrative Assistant to Peter Smichenko, Director Corporate Services and Facilities Enclosure cc: Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2002 UPDATE Transportation Alternatives IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific trans- portation alternatives available through the CCTA, as well as, providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. IDX fully supports the transportation alternatives available to our employees who are able to use them to travel to/from work. IDX subsidizes 100% of the cost of monthly transportation passes for the CCTA bus and the Champlain Flyer train. Participation in this program has remained stable since its inception. • New Hire Orientation Package IDX reaches new employees during the New Hire Orientation meeting. At these meetings, all transportation options are discussed and each new employee is provided documentation and signup sheets for the programs. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our new cafeteria has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early since it now opens at 7:30 AM, and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. ■wx" ,V HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS March 29, 2002 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David Scott Director of Project Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX System Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Enclosed please find the April 1 update to our Transportation Demand Management Plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me on 864-1758 x4018 should you have any questions. Sincerely, L nne A. Weaver Facilities & Administration Enclosure cc: Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN APRIL 2002 UPDATE • Transportation Alternatives IDX fully supports the transportation alternatives available to our employees who are able to use them to travel to/from work. IDX subsidizes 100% of the cost of monthly transportation passes for the CCTA bus and Champlain Flyer train. Employee participation has increased since the program began. In addition to the bus and train options, IDX continues to promote the car/van pool option available through the CCTA. The availability of various morning and afternoon .hours has made this program work with our Flexible Hours Policy. Should the Champlain Flyer service be discontinued by the State, IDX will work with its employees using this service to explore alternatives. New Hire Orientation Package IDX reaches new employees during the New Hire Orientation meeting. At these meetings, all transportation options are discussed and each new employee is provided documentation and signup sheets for the programs. Flexible Hours Policy The IDX Flexible Hours Policy is still in full effect, successfully allowing employees to adjust their work hours to avoid peak traffic times. CB -217.00 I h208.97 HYDRAEX15A NT MTC REFER TO VERMONT GAS SYSTEM£ INC. FOR AS BUILT `J INFORMATION FOR GAS SERVICE LINES IN THIS AREA. ------ SEE PLANS DOVE BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS a FOR IDX ENTITLED VRECORD SITE PLAN' DATED 05/12/97, UST REVISED 09102197. DRAWING NUMBER ,-y t 960B2-9A, FOR ADDfRONAL INFORMATION OF IDX DRIVE PREVIOUSLY CALLED Ha.MES ROAD EXTENSION. ALSO SEE DRAWING NUMBER 98051-REC, DATED 11/10/2000 LAST REVISED 121,29,12000 ENTITLED RECORD MASTER SITE PLAN FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE ENTIRE IDX SITE. j �i-OVERHEAD POWER +r IPTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. TM RAN a SLBTAIRE MR THE RLpOSE OI A 1ECORD DRAWNO' THIS PLR IS BASED ON ACTUAL RELD LOCATION OF SURTACE EMOENCE i KEN ON NO 7. 4 9, n, 2000 AND NOYEMBER ly 2001 BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENOWEERS. THE ACTUAL UNDERGROUND LOCAnON MAY VARY SLIGHTLY FROM THIS PLR. THE INTENT IS THAT EASEMENTS ASSOOATEO MTH ME NEW UTILITIES S"LO RUN WITH THE ACTUAL PHYSICAL LOCAnONS BEiORE USING TRBSE RAMS ENSURE THAT YOU NAVE T!fi LATLIT R[VISION LAST REVISED 11/12/01 GAS GAS SLEEVE VALVES 1 rK,1 SN ?' r t H r.TB4.29 --------------" I h177.49 3J BASINS ON W 0 -_---� 1 ------ TYPICAL TYPICAL LIGHT � 99' �'SIDEWALK ____Er, I lCISout--�I91.38 -217.08 rr UNTIE DRAIN 1- O-------'--'----------- ------ W SO4 _- DI CLASS 32 WATER MAIN I HYDRANT -- \ r 0 RANI N ___-___ . W --__ -__ - ___-__ -__--• O GAS I _ __ 1 I - ��/�- I VALVES �XI 1/aea►G j l CB .; W -_- - W " 72' 1 r-171.20 CB L-_-______ - -_ tOSJ '-___--W.__ t r- &SO t -_ -�� ' SCR J5 SERER 18" Pyr__---_______ ________-___ 0 � hf71.10 isle _________-_�- _ W I I CS 1. -«_««. S . I _ I A —17.170 ��— — STIR_ J3 SERER jiaN 6B� G : _ I 1 170.90 CB1BI� Io, g0 Mom'' /\.. �— 1 r� < `.-5---«.._.«-««._S« ,R a T 1 SEWER V 6 r-B192.42 SEl7EB «� �� MH l - i Y I _ ,. ":.;�-____-- i ;'� �^ T h7BJ.92 MH I 218.70 I^ SO_ qD __ - Sp ____-_ --- -204.24 I it h209.60 1 1-197.60 CB r-217.22 LEGE5' in-210.32 f 4" in-2/1.77 f out-210.13 ' NnuTY 9YMBDLs UTILITIES SEWER MANHOLE i3 SEWER MAINS STORM DRAINAGE AND SERVICES «--S��-- MANHOLE r" WATER MAINS AND SERVICES ___W,---- CLEANOUT o .V STORM DRAINAGE --SD---- CATCH BASIN -- r' UNDERDRAIN--UD---- VALVE w LIQUID PROPANE 1� OR NATURAL OAS----0---- FIRE HYDRANT OVERHEAD POWER ____OHp-___ WATER WELL UNDERGROUND POWER ... UPk T--- AND TELEPHONE WATER VALVE END CAP [ ARRANGEMENT N.T.£ UTILITY POLE ti . MTC OR TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL R SURVEY `SYMBOLS_ STREET LIGHT T-BAR (FOUND) a IRON PIPE (FOUND) CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND) STEEL REBAR (FOUND) 01 TOE STEEL CONTROL PANT ICE CONTROL POINT PK NAIL ° WVODCENN� PONT 0 Graphlc Scale IRON PIPE TO BE SET O Feet 50 0 50 100 ISO 200 I TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 478 81Mr Palls RPM P.O.3. 308 VAHIMon, VenTont 05495 (802) 8796331(pt—) WE)8794060OW VWt th an the Web at Www.Tn1 WAnmBWIg,D wn TVs rote rue wrAsa w Tre runs en CONCEAfiLAL APPROVAL SUeM39101 RRCOILD DRAWONC ACT 250 SLIIIW ON lR,kL APPROVAL SIIDMIS9IGN COMMUCTION DRAIRDICS I�.AI�1lRt1AIgT�R MDMM4fOf 1. 0:••Nr• AV avkbn A 1,1nen le N u/ray, F ��e1 b me to M N� weret,e��n°otn�v�'alsc.ilnw. l�M� �e�n: o.•e uw 1mtwr Sao b wio+°or tHni� 0 �Mpa I A. � t°a: mee° Fnd • N"°^r a.Mr pl•NwP'Wr 4 1„ ��IIIR=IR�� DWV Allr RSC OF VER,V yh * t�i 'RGfaTDT°�j2' �SiDNAL Pn)ea nue •III Route 7 South Burlington, Vermoni Sheet TMe Record Street Plan DfWWng Nlmlhuu: 9605f-93 Extenslon:I Pmject TT ana er : 0AB DRNRI : SMT Debt 12Z1212001 PJO.N SCAle: 1' - 40' Pfoj.d del" , xxx X-Ref: Xn( Bench File: xxx i _ R1 ' atM Y n 1• 10 PARADIS, COOMBS E FITZPATRICK ATTORNEYS A"1LAW 34 PEARL STREET ' P. U. BOX 174 ESSEX JUNCTION. VERMON r05453 eQo3 � at'•� �WARRANTY DEED d� oe" c0 ptGd GY a(uu\ KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT DENNIS L. BLODGETT and GERALD C. MILOT, a Vermont general partnership of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, GRANTOR, in the consideration of TEN AND MORE DOLLARS - 'paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON; a:mun.cipal corporation of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, GRANTEE, by these presents, do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said GRANTEE, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located on the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and as shown as HOLMES ROAD EXTENTION on a Plan entitled "Composite Survey For Blodgett Property Development" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated September, 1988, revised November 4, 1988, and to be recorded in the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. The parcel herein conveyed is more particularly described on said Plan as follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly sideline of said U.S. Route 7, said point being the southwesterly corner of the herein conveyed parcel; thence traveling S 71 degrees 26131" E a distance of 0.45 feet, more or less, to a point; thence continuing S 71 degrees 24120" E a distance of 946.31 feet, more or less, to a point depicted on said Plan as "B"; thence continuing S 70 degrees 41139" E a distance of 197.23 feet, more or less, to a point; thence deflecting to the left and traveling N 68 degrees 09150" W a distance of 197.09 feet, more or less, to a point; thence continuing N 68 degrees 32128" W a distance of 948.02 feet, more or less, to a point lying on said easterly sideline of U.S. Route 7; thence deflecting to the left and traveling S 18 degrees 51140" W a distance of 56.08 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantors herein by Warranty Deed of Dennis L. Blodgett dated December 18, 1987 and of record at Volume 256, Page 269 of said Land Records. The property herein conveyed is subject to a 20 foot wide storm water easement traveling from other lands of the Grantors, under said Holmes Road Extention, and leading to an existing storm water retention pond on lands owned by BDP Realty Associates. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. Post-HO Fax Note 7671 Date p pa°ges01 To gik C / T.b C From Co./ ept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # PARADIS, COOMBS & FITZPATRICK ATTORNEYS AT LAW 34 PEARL 5'r REET P. 0. BOX t 74 ESSFX JUNCTION. VERMONT 05453 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said GRANTEE, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; And the said GRANTOR, DENNIS L. BLODGETT and GERALD C. MILOT, a Vermont general partnership, for its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said GRANTEE, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, It is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE, except as aforesaid; and It does hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever, except as aforesaid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We hereunto set out hands and seals this ) I/- day of ;�"" :l-r{A.D. 1988. IN THE PRESENCE OF: DENNIS L. BLODGETT-GERALD C. MILOT A Partnership BY: , �c�.'C General Partner and Duty Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At J �55 Pn "Sc.T this I cl day of lJoje.ivL({',r- , A.D. 1988, DENNIS L. BLODGETT, a General Partner and Duly Authorized Agent of Dennis L. Blodgett -Gerald C. Milot, a Vermont General Partnership, personally appeared and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act and deed, and the free act and deed of Dennis L. Blodgett -Gerald C. Milot, a Vermont General Partnership. Vermont Propedv Transfer Tax I AC -pi v NOTAR5UBLIC 3 CITY Received t Recordedinl Of So. Burlinc Attest: sTITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BArrERY STREET P.O. BOX 150, BURLMWON. VERAIONT , 054021607 77, LERK'S OFFICE3� ao� at �)P M `l?-7 on pageZB n Land Records REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED `C) pret A. Picard, City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page�32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 72' 2112611 E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 2913411 W 432.51 feet more or less to+a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 0214711 E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. it 77 Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of Ja C 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT I.AW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 06402 1507 BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES BY: r aIts Duly Authorized Agent ,A I 477 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY 3TREF.T P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERNIONT 05i0. 15V STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At %' in said County, this day of : 'tA 1 e 2000 personally appeared }�j �jyd_(%. 7girpa 2� , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: Son172.fn1vrsn.rea Vermont Property Transfer Tax 32'J.S.A. Cti 1P 231 �`�" 3 ■w 9rX8 � HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS October 1, 2001 Stephanie Hesson District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 David Scott Director of Project Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 Re: IDX Systems Corporation's Transportation Demand Management Plan Update Dear Ms. Hesson and Messrs. Belair and Scott: Enclosed please find the October 1 update to our Transportation Demand Management Plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me on 864-1758 x4018 should you have any questions. Sincerely, qttt�. dt4✓rr- Lynne A. Weaver Facilities & Administration Enclosure Brad Carter, Kessel Duff Corporation Peter Smichenko, IDX Systems Corporation CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 40 IDX Drive I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN OCTOBER 2001 UPDATE • Facilities Database IDX continues to provide information to our employees regarding specific transportation alternatives available through the CCTA as well as providing a direct link to the CCTA's website. We have completed a zip code search of employees that are potential Champlain Flyer users based on their home locations and will be directly notifying them of the IDX subsidy for monthly train passes, shuttle bus availability and train schedule. At the present time, IDX is planning to subsidize at least half of the cost of the monthly train pass for commuters who take advantage of this option on a regular basis. • New Hire Orientation Package Information regarding CCTA and Champlain Flyer programs is provided to IDX new hires in Burlington. • Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy remains unchanged. This policy has successfully allowed many employees to adjust their work hours in order to avoid peak traffic periods. We believe that our new cafeteria has provided our employees with a great incentive to get to work early since it now opens at 7:30 AM, and serves a wide variety of breakfast foods and beverages. • Transportation Alternatives Commuter Choice TDM Workshop The two IDX employees primarily responsible for its TDMP attended a workshop held on July 12 at the Burlington Sheraton to learn more about commuter choice and TDM options. (See attachment.) Joint IDX/Champlain Flyer Public Meeting IDX sponsored a public meeting on September 6, 2001 to discuss how the Champlain Flyer could best serve our local area. Approximately 30 people from local businesses, community representatives, and local officials were in attendance. (See attachment.) In addition, IDX has met privately with the representatives from the Champlain Flyer on two occasions to discuss how this service could best serve the needs of its employees. Correspondence IDX anticipates releasing one or more blanket transportation memos to its Burlington employee base over the next 30-60 days, primarily outlining our train subsidy and other mass transit opportunities. We will include copies of these memos in our April 1, 2002 TDMP update. Please contact IDX directly, if you would like an interim update. O°N E:MAIN' S'J;R E E T SU1TE,-101 BURLINGTON V'ERMONT 0 5 4 0 1 802.951.4010 Please Join Us Public Meeting: Champlain Flyer train service to South Burlington September 6, 8:00 a.m. At the new IDX Office Building The Champlain Flyer will soon be stopping at the South Burlington train station on Bartlett Bay Road near Magic Hat. ❑ Will you use the Champlain Flyer when it stops in South Burlington? ❑ What can we do to make the train more convenient for you? ❑ What train schedule would best work for you? ❑ What are the connecting bus options? ❑ When will the station officially open? ❑ What questions or comments do you have? The Champlain Flyer & IDX & the Agency of Transportation are sponsoring a public meeting for area businesses and individuals interested in the train service. Please come and give us your thoughts. Directions/Parking: Turn onto IDX Drive from Shelburne Road (at Talbots). Make right-hand turn into the IDX parking lot. Take main drive to autocourt in front of main lobby, veer right and park in section of lot parallel to Shelburne Road where water fountains face Shelburne Road (look for signage "Parking for Champlain Flyer Meeting). Please check in at the front desk when entering the main lobby. Questions call Richard Watts 863-3077 or Lynne Weaver at IDX 864-1758 ext. 4018. The facility is handicapped accessible. If you have special needs call Richard at 863-3077. Refreshments provided. Commuter Choice TDM Workshop July 12, 2001 Sheraton Burlington Hotel and Conference Center AGENDA 9:00am-9:15am Registration and Coffee 9:15am-10:30am General Session: Welcome, Introduction and Presentations Welcoming remarks: William Knight - Executive Director, Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Introductory remarks: Brian Searles - Secretary, VTrans AV ,i - Presentations: UU A Local Perspective of TDM Successes and Partnerships Bob Penniman, Executive Director, Campus Area Transportation Management Association (CATMA) A National Perspective of TDM and Commuter Choice Stuart Anderson - Denver, Colorado - Executive Director, Association for Commuter Transportation (ACT), past Chair of the ACT Commuter Choice Task Force 10:30am-10:45am BREAK 10:45am-12:00 noon Panel Discussions and Q & A Panel One - Panelists will discuss their management of TDM Programs Moderator: Peter Keating, Senior Transportation Planner, Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Panelists: Jack Conry, Chair, CATMA Operations Committee - Director, Security & Parking, Fletcher Allen Health Care Maryann Danahy, Marketing and Public Affairs Manager, Chittenden County Transportation Authority Rob Hendry, Executive Director, Rte. 9 TMA, Amherst, MA Panel Two - Panelists will discuss TDM and Commuter Choice Benefits Moderator: Bob Penniman, Executive Director, CATMA Panelists: Tom Adler, President, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Stuart Anderson - Executive Director, ACT 12:00 noon-1:30pm Luncheon and Featured Speakers Molly Lambert, Secretary, Vermont Department of Commerce and Community Development Commuter Choice Leadership Initiative Presentation and Wrap up Connie Ruth - Ann Arbor, Michigan - Commuter Choice Leadership Initiative, U.S. EPA, - Innovative Transportation Programs and Partnerships MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board & Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Date: November 2, 2000 Attached is a Transportation Demand Management Plan for IDX on Shelburne Road. The Planning Commission's 1/26/00 approval of the IDX expansion project included a condition requiring the applicant to develop and implement a TDM plan. This was required in order to help mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts resulting from the expansion. The condition also requires the applicant to submit biannual progress reports explaining the status and results of the TDM plan. These progress reports are due each year for a period of five years on October 1 and April 1. Lynne Berry of IDX is requesting that the City review the plan and provide comment. Please send your comments to Ray Belair so that he may forward them to Ms. Berry. Cc: Ray Belair Sarah McCallum ® M10M HEALTHCARF_ MFORMATiON SOLUTBORIS October 10, 2000 Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Joe: Enclosed please find our Transportation Demand Management Plan, prepared by Resource Systems Group, Inc. Please review this plan and let us know if any amendments are required. Please also find our October update activity. If you have any questions, please contact me on 864-1758 x 4018. Sincerely, L ne A. Berry Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo, Manager, Facilities & Administration Enclosures Brad Carter, Kessel/Duff Corporation Norman Marshall, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Peter Plumeau, Chittenden Metropolitan Planning Organization fl:OAPO6?AYE HEAUQUAR72AS 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN IDX Systems Corporation has taken further steps in administering the Transportation Demand Management Plan by doing the following: Communications Facilities Database Our database holds information regarding the local CCTA information on the Ride Share program, as well as a direct link to the CCTA website. An e-mail communication providing this link was sent to IDX Burlington employees ❖ New Hire Orientation Package We are providing information to new hires regarding the CCTA programs available. Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy is standard. We previously presented you with a copy of this policy. Traffic Survey Our traffic survey was completed and the data compiled by Resource Systems Group, Inc. Please refer to the Transportation Demand Management Plan for results. The CCTA also compiled data from the results of the traffic survey. IDX employees interested in carpooling received names of other IDX employees who were possible candidates and advised to contact each other to set up carpools. Vanpool information was also sent to interested individuals by the CCTA. Construction of IDX Drive We are on schedule with the construction of IDX Drive. The road connecting to Green Mountain Drive is expected to be completed by approximately the end of October. Upon completion, notice of the "official opening" of the road will be communicated to IDX employees.. RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for: IDX October 3, 2000 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 INTRODUCTION In 1999, IDX implemented a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan that supports a reduction in single -occupancy -vehicle (SOV) commuting trips. The TDM Plan includes: 1) Variable/Flexible Working Hours - There are Variable/Flexible Working Hours available to most IDX employees, and therefore, not all employees enter the roadway system simultaneously. This spreads out the impact of IDX commutes. 2) Pedestrian Access -The site plan includes pedestrian access to the adjacent street system. 3) Bicycle Facilities - Protected bicycle racks and shower facilities are provided. 4) Bus -CCTA bus passes for commuting employees are paid for by IDX. Bus users are supported with a guaranteed ride home program (administered by CCTA). IDX committed to surveying its employees concerning commuting options, including employer - sponsored vanpools. This report summarizes the results of the employee survey and analyzes the potential for vanpools. IDX EMPLOYEE SURVEY SUMMARY IDX worked with Jeanne McCormick of the CCTA to develop a survey of its employees covering commuting behavior and level of interest in commuting alternatives. A total of 571 responses were received in March, 2000. MEANS OF COMMUTING Employees were asked how many days a week they drive alone, carpool, ride CCTA bus, walk or bike to work. Currently, the great majority (89 percent) of IDX employees drive alone to work. The next most popular mode is carpool with 10 percent. All other modes (CCTA bus, walk, and bicycle) total only 1 percent. The pattern of responses closely mirrors behavior in the region (Figure 1). Because of its suburban location, IDX has fewer workers commuting by bus, walk, and bicycle modes than the average for Chittenden County. Therefore, there are somewhat more drive alone and carpool commuters. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Figure 1: IDX Commuting Behavior Compared with Regional Averagesi Drive Alone Carpool CCTA Walk Bike Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 85. 6% 9.52% 9.70% 0.87% Chittenden County 0.18% IDX 3.68 o 0.46% 0.87% 0.48% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00 Employees expressed interest in alternative modes and made suggestions on how non -auto modes could be more attractive. Comments include: Walking • I'd walk more often if there were better cross -walks and sidewalks on Shelburne Rd. • I think a good bike path or nice pedestrian walkways would be wonderful. Currently it is NOT fun walking along Shelburne Road. I enjoy walking and it is a good way to incorporate exercise into my daily schedule. Blip • I can ride my bicycle from North Avenue to approximately the K-Mart parking lot. There isn't a good way to get from there to Green Mountain Drive so commuting to work by bicycle this bicycling season is going to be very difficult. • It would be helpful to extend the bike path from Kmart so it reaches to IDX. So I would not have to, when I ride my bike, be on Route 7 going north or south any time while I am on my bike. • Create a better bike commute down/ along Shelburne Road!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Isn't easy or fun at this point. 1 Household survey done for Chittenden Comity Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1998. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 3 • I run to work as often as possible. It is great that the bike path has been cleared this winter. More and better sidewalks and lighted bike paths! • How about bicycle access from Spear St to IDX? I don't dare ride a bike on or near Shelburne Rd! • Shelburne Road/Route 7 is nothing more than a paved, quasi -quaint, country lane that needs widening, not to mention sidewalks (which would allow me to safely ride my bike to work). Bus • I'd like to see bus shelters on all bus routes, but especially along Shelburne Road. • Most buses are dirty, run at times that are not convenient and don't go to my house when I need them to. • I used to ride the bus from Essex Jct to downtown Burlington. Now I live in Essex Town and work on Shelburne Rd and the trip takes way too long. • A fleet of small buses, with frequent trips and good connections, funded by a fuel tax, would get my attention. (You could even replace school bus service with such a fleet.). • I will probably take the bus more in the winter so it would be nice to be compensated for use of the bus with a discounted pass. • If CCTA buses had a direct route from So. Burl. to Shelburne Road (without going to downtown Burlington), I would definitely use that service. We checked it out when we moved, and it would currently take us over an hour to get to work using the bus. • I would like to take the bus; however, the bus stop is a bit of a walk, the bus route from my house in South Burlington to IDX is inconvenient, and the times of the day the bus comes are also inconvenient. • I would take a bus if it ran on time at frequent intervals. IDX employees were asked about the commuter rail option. Many staff liked the idea of commuter rail but wonder whether it will serve them. Among those who would be served (Burlington, Charlotte, and Shelburne), employees made these comments: Burlington residents • Can't see the need with the short distance of the commute. • More economical way of getting to work. • Depending on the times of service I would like the alternative. • Wouldn't go all the way to my house. Wouldn't make sense. • I don't live near the train. 0 Depending on the times of service I would like the alternative. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 4 • I would use it, because I can walk from my home in Burlington to the train. If the train ran in short increments of time in the moming, I would take it as it would be faster than driving on Shelburne Road. • It's only 8 miles to commute. • I live in Burlington, not Shelburne or Charlotte. [Assuming good reverse commute service is provided, will need to educate employees.] • I would like to have a stress -free ride provided that I could get home when I needed/wanted to. • I prefer commuter rail service over bus, van, or carpool. • Don't live far enough away to use commuter rail. • If there was ample parking at both ends of service. • Don't live near rail station. • Only if the times of arrivals and departures were very flexible-15 minutes. Charlotte residents • Possibly, if it was convenient, and did not make me late for work. • I like trains. • Convenient access to tracks here and near IDX. Need a bike rack on train. • Too expensive, no parking in Charlotte for Commuter Rail, will take too long to get to IDX. • Too far from my house to station. • I might do that. Shelburne residents • I live close enough that it would be more of a hassle to use something like this. • Take more time. • I think the Commuter Rail stops in Shelburne, then next stop is Burlington. So, it just wouldn't make sense. • Incredible amount of extra time wasted to get to train (by car), find parking space, pay for train, get off train, get ride to destination from train station, then do all over again in reverse. • Occasionally, for the heck of it. • I just moved from Boston to Burlington and I bought a second car so that my commute would be shorter. Commuting by Car is 10 minutes door to door. Commuting bus is 25 minutes (without traffic). Commuting by train will be 25-35 minutes. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 • But depends on hours available. • I live too close. Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 5 • I support this effort to get traffic off Shelburne Road and other common routes into the Burlington area, and would be willing to sacrifice some convenience in order to use the train. • I live too close to the office. [A number of other responses were similar, particularly from those who live north of the Shelburne rail station.] There is interest in the commuter rail option, particularly for those with longer commutes. However, it is difficult to estimate IDX ridership until the employees have a much better understanding of the commuter rail option, including travel time, frequency of service, and availability of shuttle service to IDX from the South Burlington station. COMMUTING EXPERIENCE Many employees complained about traffic problems, especially concerning Shelburne Road. Widening was frequently mentioned as well as improvements to specific intersections. However, when asked the question: Compare to the various activities you conduct during the day, do you find your daily commute - more stressful, about as stressful, or less stressful than most activities, most employees answered less stressful (Figure 2). Only 8 percent answered "more stressful." Figure 2: How Does Commuting Stress With Stress From Other Daily Activities? More 8% The Less Same 57% 35% The most stressful elements are driving related: traffic, weather, and road conditions (Figure 3). IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Figure 3: What Are the Most Stressful Aspects? (Check All That Apply) Traffic Weather Road Conditions Distance Environmental Degredation Expense Auto Dependability Other COMMUTING CONTRAINTS Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 6 65 35 ,/o 25 o 11% 0/6 8�% 4% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Many commuters make stops before and/or after work, or use their cars for errands during the day, and these needs were cited by many employees as reasons for driving alone to work. The reasons given include variable and uncertain work schedules, need for the car to do errands on the commute or during the day, time, and convenience. Table 1 below summarizes employee's use of cars to and from work, or during the day. The first column gives the percentage of employees using their vehicles for a specific purpose. The second column gives the average number of times per week for the activity for those employees with the activity. Many employees have different schedules on different days. This creates some opporturiities for alternative mode use on some days of the week. However, it complicates coordination of carpools. Table 1: Summary of IDX Emplovees' Usaqe of Cars Before, After, and/or Durin_q the Day Activity Percent Average Times Per Week Errands/personal services/shopping 78.3 2.4 Drop off or pick up children at school or childcare 37.3 4.4 Exercise 21.4 2.8 Eat 25.4 2.0 Pick up or drop off carpooler 6.5 3.5 Other 4.9 2.0 Over three quarters of employees do some personal errands on the way to or from work, or during work, with an average of 2.4 these activities per week. The next most common activity is dropping IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 7 off and/or picking up children (37.3 percent of employees) with an average of 4.4 times per week, the highest for any activity. Dropping off and/or picking up children probably is the most severe constraint to carpooling or the other alternative modes. Some of the other activities could be rescheduled. However, many employees comment that time and convenience are of great importance to them. POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED CARPOOLING When asked: "Are you interested in carpooling to your company?" 23.1 percent answered "yes." This appears to be much greater than the 9.7 percent carpool mode share shown in Figure 1. However, many employees carpool for only a portion of their commuting trips, with 15.1 percent of employees carpooling sometimes. Therefore the 23.1 percent answering "yes" is about 1 1/ times the existing share. Many of those answering "yes" also added a "but" in their comments, with concerns about time, convenience, and linked trips for other activities. Therefore, the potential for increasing carpooling is limited, but worth some additional effort. Several employees commented that they had signed up with Vermont Rideshare and that no matches had been found. POTENTIAL FOR VANPOOLS Vanpools carry more people than carpools and can offer additional savings in cost, energy use, traffic, and air pollution. For these reasons, the State of Vermont has incentives to encourage vanpools. Vermont Rideshare offers an Interest -Free Van Loan Program through the State Infrastructure Bank. The VPTA [Vermont Public Transportation Association] vanpool program is easy to use, cost effective, and flexible. VPTA also offers a third -party lease program. This public -private partnership offers flexible agreements and options for van pool members. Advantages of the Third - Parry Program include: unlimited personal use of the van, drivers ride free, 30-day pay-as-you-go agreement, full maintenance and insurance, and back-up vehicle service. VPTA serves as a referral agency for the leasing program. Selection of the type of vanpool arrangement and the third -party vendor are made by the vanpool group and all financial and operating agreements are between the group and the vendor.1 A major obstacle to carpooling or vanpooling is the extra time and inconvenience associated with getting everyone together and making multiple stops. With more people in a vanpool, these problems can be multiplied. Therefore, vanpools make most sense for longer commutes. With longer commutes the benefits of vanpools are great. Cost savings are substantial, including vehicle operating 1 http://www.vpta.net/publicservice job vanpool.htlnl IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 8 cost, maintenance expense, and depreciation. On longer commutes, not doing the driving is perceived as a significant benefit by some. The challenge in forming vanpools is that the density of employees commuting also declines with distance. Some of the employees with the longest commutes, e.g. from Barre, are interested in vanpooling but there are not enough employees in these areas to support a vanpool (at least not to IDX only). The challenge in forming successful vanpools is to find the areas where the benefits of vanpooling are great and there is a critical mass of interested employees. Based on the survey results, there are two clusters where IDX vanpools appear most feasible - employees living Franklin County, and employees living in Underhill and Jericho. FRANKLIN COUNTY A total of 27 employees responding to the survey live in Franklin County, and 12 answered that they were interested in vanpooling (44 percent). The breakdown by municipality is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Franklin County employees: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? Fairfax Fairfield Fletcher Georgia St. Albans Swanton - -- 0 Yes No -- - �- Swanton AlbaSt. ns Georgia Fletcher Fairfield 1 Fairfax 0 No 0 4 11 3 0 9 Yes 2 2 4 1 1 2 The majority of the employees are in southern Franklin County. However, the van could originate as far north as Swanton where two employees expressed interest in being vanpool drivers. Alternatively, the van could originate in St. Albans where two other employees expressed an interest in driving. The southern Franklin County employees could carpool to the Georgia park -and -ride lot 4-89 Exit 18) and be picked up by the van there. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 9 IDX has flexible working hours and the 12 employees have different work schedules (Figure 5). However, there appears to be a clustering around approximately an 8:00 a.m. - 5:15 p.m. It appears that a sizable group could agree to a schedule, considering that individual employees would have the option to drive on particular days when they knew a special schedule was needed. Figure 5: Reported Work Schedules of Franklin County employees answering yes to the question: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? 8:00 PM 6:00 PM 4:00 PM 2:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 8:00 AM 6:00 AM Vanpools can carry up to 15 people, so there would be room to accommodate other Franklin County employees who answered "no" and/or future employees as IDX grows. JERICHO AND UNDERHILL A total of 27 employees responding to the survey live in Jericho and Underhill, and 19 answered that they were interested in vanpooling (37 percent).1 The breakdown by municipality is shown in Figure 6. 1 Includes one response stating plans to move from Burlington to Underhill during this summer. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 10 Figure 6: Jericho and Underhill employees: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? Jericho Underhill 0 5 10 15 20 Underhill Jericho ED No 5 12 ® Yes 5 5 ® Yes Eg No This van would originate in Underhill and make one or two stops in Jericho. Exact routing would have to be planned carefully to avoid unnecessary delays. IDX has flexible working hours and the 10 employees have different work schedules (Figure 7). However, there appears to be a clustering around approximately an 8:15 a.m. - 5:35 p.m. As with the Franklin County employees, it appears that a sizable group could agree to a schedule. Figure 7: Reported Work Schedules of Jericho and Underhill employees answering yes to the question: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? 8:00 PM - - - - IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 11 There would be room to accommodate other Jericho and Underhill employees who answered "no" and/or future employees as IDX grows. If there is additional capacity, a stop at the park and ride lot at Exit 11 in Richmond may also is a possibility. CONCLUSIONS DRAWN Definitive steps that IDX is committed to this TDMP are: 1) Shower rooms and bike racks for employees wishing to walk or ride bikes to work 2) IDX is willing to pay for bus passes. 3) IDX has instituted flexible working hours to assist employees and off-load road traffic. 4) On -going efforts include: ❖ New Employee Orientation Package -- includes information regarding CCTA bus, carpool and vanpool programs. ❖ Periodic reminders of commuting options sent via e-mail to Burlington employees. ❖ CCTA information linked into Facilities Database (all employees have access to the database). ❖ CCTA letter sent to IDX employees on August 29, 2000, listing other employees that are commuting from same residential area to IDX (based on response to survey administered by IDX and CCTA). NEXT STEPS IN VANPOOL PLANNING Employees have expressed interest in vanpools, but have many constraints — including variable work schedules and other activities. Minimizing commuting time is of strong interest. Further steps are required to find out how serious the interest is. The next step is to hold lunchtime meetings at IDX in this fall for the two groups identified: 1) residents of Franklin County, and 2) residents of Jericho and Underhill. All employees would be invited including those who answered "no" to the vanpool question. A representative of the Vermont Public Transportation Association (VPTA) would be present to explain the vanpool program and to answer questions. Props would be prepared where employees would indicate their home locations, and desired work schedules. A proposed service, including route, and estimated travel times would be prepared. Employees would be asked whether they would use the service. Even if it were determined that one or both of the vanpools were infeasible, some new carpools might be formed. The VPTA representative also could promote and answer questions about Vermont Rideshare. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board & Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Date: November 2, 2000 Attached is a Transportation Demand Management Plan for IDX on Shelburne Road. The Planning Commission's 1/26/00 approval of the IDX expansion project included a condition requiring the applicant to develop and implement a TDM plan. This was required in order to help mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts resulting from the expansion. The condition also requires the applicant to submit biannual progress reports explaining the status and results of the TDM plan. These progress reports are due each year for a period of five years on October 1 and April 1. Lynne Berry of IDX is requesting that the City review the plan and provide comment. Please send your comments to Ray Belair so that he may forward them to Ms. Berry. Cc: Ray Belair Sarah McCallum g ... 'p � �a : �� ",l�;�';y a, ire.., a' ,(`'�A,'. '• Mw TM .11v HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS October 10, 2000 Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Joe: Enclosed please find our Transportation Demand Management Plan, prepared by Resource Systems Group, Inc. Please review this plan and let us know if any amendments are required. Please also find our October update activity. If you have any questions, please contact me on 864-1758 x 4018. Sincerely, L ne A. Berry Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo, Manager, Facilities & Administration Enclosures Brad Carter, Kessel/Duff Corporation Norman Marshall, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Peter Plumeau, Chittenden Metropolitan Planning Organization CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN IDX Systems Corporation has taken further steps in administering the Transportation Demand Management Plan by doing the following: Communications ❖ Facilities Database Our database holds information regarding the local CCTA information on the Ride Share program, as well as a direct link to the CCTA website. An e-mail communication providing this link was sent to IDX Burlington employees ❖ New Hire Orientation Package We are providing information to new hires regarding the CCTA programs available. Flexible Hours Policy Our flexible hours policy is standard. We previously presented you with a copy of this policy. Traffic Survey Our traffic survey was completed and the data compiled by Resource Systems Group, Inc. Please refer to the Transportation Demand Management Plan for results. The CCTA also compiled data from the results of the traffic survey. IDX employees interested in carpooling received names of other IDX employees who were possible candidates and advised to contact each other to set up carpools. Vanpool information was also sent to interested individuals by the CCTA. Construction of IDX Drive We are on schedule with the construction of IDX Drive. The road connecting to Green Mountain Drive is expected to be completed by approximately the end of October. Upon completion, notice of the 'official opening" of the road will be communicated to IDX employees. RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for: IDX October 3, 2000 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 INTRODUCTION In 1999, IDX implemented a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan that supports a reduction in single -occupancy -vehicle (SOV) commuting trips. The TDM Plan includes: 1) Variable/Flexible Working Hours — There are Variable/Flexible Working Hours available to most IDX employees, and therefore, not all employees enter the roadway system simultaneously. This spreads out the impact of IDX commutes. 2) Pedestrian Access —The site plan includes pedestrian access to the adjacent street system. 3) Bicycle Facilities — Protected bicycle racks and shower facilities are provided. 4) Bus —CCTA bus passes for commuting employees are paid for by IDX. Bus users are supported with a guaranteed ride home program (administered by CCTA). IDX committed to surveying its employees concerning commuting options, including employer - sponsored vanpools. This report summarizes the results of the employee survey and analyzes the potential for vanpools. IDX EMPLOYEE SURVEY SUMMARY IDX worked with Jeanne McCormick of the CCTA to develop a survey of its employees covering commuting behavior and level of interest in commuting alternatives. A total of 571 responses were received in March, 2000. MEANS OF COMMUTING Employees were asked how many days a week they drive alone, carpool, ride CCTA bus, walk or bike to work. Currently, the great majority (89 percent) of IDX employees drive alone to work. The next most popular mode is carpool with 10 percent. All other modes (CCTA bus, walk, and bicycle) total only 1 percent. The pattern of responses closely mirrors behavior in the region (Figure 1). Because of its suburban location, IDX has fewer workers commuting by bus, walk, and bicycle modes than the average for Chittenden County. Therefore, there are somewhat more drive alone and carpool commuters. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Figure 1: IDX Commuting Behavior Compared with Regional Averagesi Drive Alone Carpool CCTA Walk Bike Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 2 85. 6% I89.18% I 9.52% 9.70% 0.87% EChittenden County 0.18% 1DX 3.68 o .46% 0.87% 0.48% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00 Employees expressed interest in alternative modes and made suggestions on how non -auto modes could be more attractive. Comments include: Walking • I'd walk more often if there were better cross -walks and sidewalks on Shelburne Rd. • I think a good bike path or nice pedestrian walkways would be wonderful. Currently it is NOT fun walking along Shelburne Road. I enjoy walking and it is a good way to incorporate exercise into my daily schedule. Berne • I can ride my bicycle from North Avenue to approximately the K-Mart parking lot. There isn't a good way to get from there to Green Mountain Drive so commuting to work by bicycle this bicycling season is going to be very difficult. • It would be helpful to extend the bike path from Kmart so it reaches to IDX. So I would not have to, when I ride my bike, be on Route 7 going north or south any time while I am on my bike. • Create a better bike commute down/ along Shelburne Road !!!!!!L!! M Isn't easy or fun at this point. 1 Household survey done for Chinenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization, 1998. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 3 • I run to work as often as possible. It is great that the bike path has been cleared this winter. More and better sidewalks and lighted bike paths! • How about bicycle access from Spear St to IDX? I don't dare ride a bike on or near Shelburne Rd! • Shelburne Road/Route 7 is nothing more than a paved, quasi -quaint, country lane that needs widening, not to mention sidewalks (which would allow me to safely ride my bike to work). Bus • I'd like to see bus shelters on all bus routes, but especially along Shelburne Road. • Most buses are dirty, run at times that are not convenient and don't go to my house when I need them to. • I used to ride the bus from Essex Jct to downtown Burlington. Now I live in Essex Town and work on Shelburne Rd and the trip takes way too long. • A fleet of small buses, with frequent trips and good connections, funded by a fuel tax, would get my attention. (You could even replace school bus service with such a fleet). • I will probably take the bus more in the winter so it would be nice to be compensated for use of the bus with a discounted pass. • If CCTA buses had a direct route from So. Burl. to Shelburne Road (without going to downtown Burlington), I would definitely use that service. We checked it out when we moved, and it would currently take us over an hour to get to work using the bus. • I would like to take the bus; however, the bus stop is a bit of a walk, the bus route from my house in South Burlington to IDX is inconvenient, and the times of the day the bus comes are also inconvenient. • I would take a bus if it ran on time at frequent intervals. IDX employees were asked about the commuter rail option. Many staff liked the idea of commuter rail but wonder whether it will serve them. Among those who would be served (Burlington, Charlotte, and Shelburne), employees made these comments: Burlington residents • Cant see the need with the short distance of the commute. • More economical way of getting to work. • Depending on the times of service I would like the alternative. • Wouldn't go all the way to my house. Wouldn't make sense. • I don't live near the train. • Depending on the times of service I would like the alternative. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 4 • I would use it, because I can walk from my home in Burlington to the train. If the train ran in short increments of time in the morning, I would take it as it would be faster than driving on Shelburne Road. • It's only 8 miles to commute. • I live in Burlington, not Shelburne or Charlotte. [Assuming good reverse commute service is provided, will need to educate employees.] • I would like to have a stress -free ride provided that I could get home when I needed/wanted to. • I prefer commuter rail service over bus, van, or carpool. • Don't live far enough away to use commuter rail. • If there was ample parking at both ends of service. • Don't live near rail station. • Only if the times of arrivals and departures were very flexible-15 minutes. Charlotte residents • Possibly, if it was convenient, and did not make me late for work. • 1 like trains. • Convenient access to tracks here and near IDX. Need a bike rack on train. • Too expensive, no parking in Charlotte for Commuter Rail, will take too long to get to IDX. • Too far from my house to station. • 1 might do that. Shelburne residents • I live close enough that it would be more of a hassle to use something like this. • Take more time. • I think the Commuter Rail stops in Shelburne, then next stop is Burlington. So, it just wouldn't make sense. • Incredible amount of extra time wasted to get to train (by car), find parking space, pay for train, get off train, get ride to destination from train station, then do all over again in reverse. • Occasionally, for the heck of it. • 1 just moved from Boston to Burlington and I bought a second car so that my commute would be shorter. Commuting by Car is 10 minutes door to door. Commuting bus is 25 minutes (without traffic). Commuting by train will be 25-35 minutes. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 • But depends on hours available. • I live too close. Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 5 • I support this effort to get traffic off Shelburne Road and other common routes into the Burlington area, and would be willing to sacrifice some convenience in order to use the train. • I live too close to the office. [A number of other responses were similar , particularly from those who live north of the Shelburne rail station.] There is interest in the commuter rail option, particularly for those with longer commutes. However, it is difficult to estimate IDX ridership until the employees have a much better understanding of the commuter rail option, including travel time, frequency of service, and availability of shuttle service to IDX from the South Burlington station. COMMUTING EXPERIENCE Many employees complained about traffic problems, especially concerning Shelburne Road. Widening was frequently mentioned as well as improvements to specific intersections. However, when asked the question: Compare to the various activities you conduct during the day, do you find your daily commute - more stressful, about as stressful, or less stressful than most activities, most employees answered less stressful (Figure 2). Only 8 percent answered "more stressful." Figure 2: How Does Commuting Stress With Stress From Other Daily Activities? The most stressful elements are driving related: traffic, weather, and road conditions (Figure 3). IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Figure 3: What Are the Most Stressful Aspects? (Check All That Apply) Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 6 Traffic 65 0 Weather 35 /o Road Conditions 25 0 Distance 110 Environmental Degredation % Expense % Auto Dependability 4% Other 6 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% COMMUTING CONTRAINTS Many commuters make stops before and/or after work, or use their cars for errands during the day, and these needs were cited by many employees as reasons for driving alone to work. The reasons given include variable and uncertain work schedules, need for the car to do errands on the commute or during the day, time, and convenience. Table 1 below summarizes employee's use of cars to and from work, or during the day. The first column gives the percentage of employees using their vehicles for a specific purpose. The second column gives the average number of times per week for the activity for those employees with the activity. Many employees have different schedules on different days. This creates some opportunities for alternative mode use on some days of the week. However, it complicates coordination of carpools. Table 1: Summary of IDX Employees' Usage of Cars Before, After, and/or During the Day Activity Percent Average Times Per Week Errands/personal services/shopping 78.3 2.4 Drop off or pick up children at school or childcare 37.3 4.4 Exercise 21.4 2.8 Eat 25.4 2.0 Pick up or drop off carpooler 6.5 3.5 Other 4.9 2.0 Over three quarters of employees do some personal errands on the way to or from work, or during work, with an average of 2.4 these activities per week. The next most common activity is dropping IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan Resource Systems Group, Inc. October, 2000 page 7 off and/or picking up children (37.3 percent of employees) with an average of 4.4 times per week, the highest for any activity. Dropping off and/or picking up children probably is the most severe constraint to carpooling or the other alternative modes. Some of the other activities could be rescheduled. However, many employees comment that time and convenience are of great importance to them. POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED CARPOOLING When asked: "Are you interested in carpooling to your company?" 23.1 percent answered "yes." This appears to be much greater than the 9.7 percent carpool mode share shown in Figure 1. However, many employees carpool for only a portion of their commuting trips, with 15.1 percent of employees carpooling sometimes. Therefore the 23.1 percent answering "yes" is about 1 1/2 times the existing share. Many of those answering "yes" also added a "but" in their comments, with concerns about time, convenience, and linked trips for other activities. Therefore, the potential for increasing carpooling is limited, but worth some additional effort. Several employees commented that they had signed up with Vermont Rideshare and that no matches had been found. POTENTIAL FOR VANPOOLS Vanpools carry more people than carpools and can offer additional savings in cost, energy use, traffic, and air pollution. For these reasons, the State of Vermont has incentives to encourage vanpools. Vermont Rideshare offers an Interest -Free Van Loan Program through the State Infrastructure Bank. The VPTA [Vermont Public Transportation Association] vanpool program is easy to use, cost effective, and flexible. VPTA also offers a third -party lease program. This public -private partnership offers flexible agreements and options for van pool members. Advantages of the Third - Party Program include: unlimited personal use of the van, drivers ride free, 30-day pay-as-you-go agreement, full maintenance and insurance, and back-up vehicle service. VPTA serves as a referral agency for the leasing program. Selection of the type of vanpool arrangement and the third -party vendor are made by the vanpool group and all financial and operating agreements are between the group and the vendor.1 A major obstacle to carpooling or vanpooling is the extra time and inconvenience associated with getting everyone together and making multiple stops. With more people in a vanpool, these problems can be multiplied. Therefore, vanpools make most sense for longer commutes. With longer commutes the benefits of vanpools are great. Cost savings are substantial, including vehicle operating lhttp://www.vpta.net/i)ublicservice iob vanpool.html IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 8 cost, maintenance expense, and depreciation. On longer commutes, not doing the driving is perceived as a significant benefit by some. The challenge in forming vanpools is that the density of employees commuting also declines with distance. Some of the employees with the longest commutes, e.g. from Barre, are interested in vanpooling but there are not enough employees in these areas to support a vanpool (at least not to IDX only). The challenge in forming successful vanpools is to find the areas where the benefits of vanpooling are great and there is a critical mass of interested employees. Based on the survey results, there are two clusters where IDX vanpools appear most feasible — employees living Franklin County, and employees living in Underhill and Jericho. FRANKLIN COUNTY A total of 27 employees responding to the survey live in Franklin County, and 12 answered that they were interested in vanpooling (44 percent). The breakdown by municipality is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Franklin County employees: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? Fairfax Fairfield Fletcher it � Yes Georgia No St. Albans Swanton -20 Swanton Albans Georgia Fletcher Fai eId Fairfax F1No 0 4 11 3 0 9 ® Yes 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 The majority of the employees are in southern Franklin County. However, the van could originate as far north as Swanton where two employees expressed interest in being vanpool drivers. Alternatively, the van could originate in St. Albans where two other employees expressed an interest in driving. The southern Franklin County employees could carpool to the Georgia park -and -ride lot 0-89 Exit 18) and be picked up by the van there. IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 9 IDX has flexible working hours and the 12 employees have different work schedules (Figure 5). However, there appears to be a clustering around approximately an 8:00 a.m. - 5:15 p.m. It appears that a sizable group could agree to a schedule, considering that individual employees would have the option to drive on particular days when they knew a special schedule was needed. Figure 5: Reported Work Schedules of Franklin County employees answering yes to the question: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? Vanpools can carry up to 15 people, so there would be room to accommodate other Franklin County employees who answered "no" and/or future employees as IDX grows. JERICHO AND UNDERHILL A total of 27 employees responding to the survey live in Jericho and Underhill, and 19 answered that they were interested in vanpooling (37 percent).1 The breakdown by municipality is shown in Figure 6. 1 Includes one response stating plans to move from Burlington to Underhill during this summer. I I IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 10 Figure 6: Jericho and Underhill employees: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? Jericho Underhill 0 5 10 15 20 Underhill Jericho ImNo 5 12 ■ Yes 5 5 Yes No This van would originate in Underhill and make one or two stops in Jericho. Exact routing would have to be planned carefully to avoid unnecessary delays. IDX has flexible working hours and the 10 employees have different work schedules (Figure 7). However, there appears to be a clustering around approximately an 8:15 a.m. - 5:35 p.m. As with the Franklin County employees, it appears that a sizable group could agree to a schedule. Figure 7: Reported Work Schedules of Jericho and Underhill employees answering yes to the question: "Are you interested in vanpooling to your company? 8:00 PM 6:00 PM 4.00 PM01, 2:00 PM 6 12:00 PM 10:00 AM 8:00 AM 6:00 AM IDX Transportation Demand Management Plan October, 2000 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 11 There would be room to accommodate other Jericho and Underhill employees who answered "no" and/or future employees as IDX grows. If there is additional capacity, a stop at the park and ride lot at Exit 11 in Richmond may also is a possibility. CONCLUSIONS DRAWN Definitive steps that IDX is committed to this TDMP are: 1) Shower rooms and bike racks for employees wishing to walk or ride bikes to work 2) IDX is willing to pay for bus passes. 3) IDX has instituted flexible working hours to assist employees and off-load road traffic. 4) On -going efforts include: ❖ New Employee Orientation Package -- includes information regarding CCTA bus, carpool and vanpool programs. ❖ Periodic reminders of commuting options sent via e-mail to Burlington employees. ❖ CCTA information linked into Facilities Database (all employees have access to the database). ❖ CCTA letter sent to IDX employees on August 29, 2000, listing other employees that are commuting from same residential area to IDX (based on response to survey administered by IDX and CCTA). NEXT STEPS IN VANPOOL PLANNING Employees have expressed interest in vanpools, but have many constraints — including variable work schedules and other activities. N inimizing commuting time is of strong interest. Further steps are required to find out how serious the interest is. The next step is to hold lunchtime meetings at IDX in this fall for the two groups identified: 1) residents of Franklin County, and 2) residents of Jericho and Underhill. All employees would be invited including those who answered "no" to the vanpool question. A representative of the Vermont Public Transportation Association (VPTA) would be present to explain the vanpool program and to answer questions. Props would be prepared where employees would indicate their home locations, and desired work schedules. A proposed service, including route, and estimated travel times would be prepared. Employees would be asked whether they would use the service. Even if it were determined that one or both of the vanpools were infeasible, some new carpools might be formed. The VPTA representative also could promote and answer questions about Vermont Rideshare. ■wXTM, HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS October 12, 2000 David J. Scott, P.E. Director of Project Development State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 James Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: IDX Systems Corporation - Transportation Demand Management Plan Gentlemen: Enclosed please find our Transportation Demand Management Plan. If you have any questions, please contact me on 802-864-1758 x 4018. Sincerely, L nne A. Berry Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo, Manager Facilities & Administration Enclosure cc: Brad Carter, Kessel/Duff Corporation Norman Marshall, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Peter Plumeau, Chittenden Metropolitan Planning Organization Joe Weith, City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telepbone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: October 2, 2000 rmshford@grayshea.com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: Enclosed please find the original Sewer Main Easement. Please be in touch with any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rush ord RHR:ejh Enclosure Stephen R. Crampton Clarke A. Gravel Stewart H. McConaughy Charles T. Shea Robert B. Hemley Of Coandel William G. Poet, Jr. Craig Weatherly Norman Williams James E. Knapp Special Couneel John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Leigh Polk Cole Peter S. Erly Johan W. E. Maitland Robert F. O'Neill Michelle N. Farkas Margaret L. Montgomery Rebecca C. Raskin Stephen P. Magowan Andrew D. Manitsky Heather Briggs Robert H. Rushford CITYRc C Rece vee Record, pf So. Buriingt Attest; vle�l STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 S 0BrICB ) ats � on page3 n Land P.eccrds SEWER MAIN EASEMENT stet A. Picard, City Clerk KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont (Grantor), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual right and easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring and/or replacing sewer lines, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of the Grantor's property situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more particularly described as follows: Being a strip of land with a uniform width of twenty feet (201) centered on the existing sewer main, beginning near the southwesterly corner of Grantor's property, known and numbered as 1500 Shelburne Road, at the easterly sideline of Route 7 right-of-way, and extending across the southerly portion of Grantor's property in an easterly direction a distance of 570 feet, more or less, to a point near the northwest corner of the lands of Allson Partnership (see Volume 214, Page 451 of the City of South Burlington Land Records); thence continuing in an easterly direction with a uniform width of ten feet (101) along the southerly sideline of Grantor's property a distance of 291 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Grantor's property at the Green Mountain Drive right- of-way. Said sewer line is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting 1 Engineers, Inc., dated October 18, 1999, last revised January 18, 2000 and recorded in Map Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the herein Grantor by the following deeds: (1) Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company dated January 18, 1979 and recorded in Volume 146, Page 459 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; (2) Warranty Deed of the City of South Burlington, dated September 9, 1991 and recorded in Volume 317, Page 210 of said Land Records; and (3) Warranty Deed of Allson Partnership dated October 13, 1998 and recorded in Volume 439, Page 103 of said Land Records. Grantor, and its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of the easement by the within Grantee, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said right-of-way easement which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to exercise its rights granted hereunder. The Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this right-of-way easement shall be restored to its condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. This right-of-way easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any sanitary sewer pipelines, manholes and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds records thereof, all in further aid of this description. 2 q'Y DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this day of ••• IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: V- K4ft�,j V, *A Duly authorized agent At in said Count t is day of 2000 ON�4► A - duly au hori ed agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, personally appeared, and he/she acknowledge this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Son162.rea Transfer Tax Vermont Prope�Cha4 231 Acyuq d Pr��,�_;PCB C:r�.�:`�.,;D 3 Before me, No ary P licJ�� U3 f 4r f MD 0FU0CUMENT GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law Stephen R. Crampton Clarke A. Gravel Stewart H. McConaughy Charles T Shea Robert B. Hemley Of Coundel William G. Post, Jr. 76 St. Paul Street Craig Weatherly Norman Williams James E. Knapp Special Coundel Post Office Box 369 John R. Ponsetto Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Dennis R. Pearson Leigh Polk Cole g Peter S. Erly Johan W.E. Maitland Robert F. O'Neill Michelle N. Farkas Telephone 802.658.0220 Margaret L. Montgomery Rebecca C. Raskin Stephen P. Magowan Andrew D. Manitsky Facsimile 802.658.1466 Heather Briggs www.gravelshea.com Robert H. Rushford Writer's E-Mail: September 28, 2000 rrushford@grayshea.com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Ad:ni.listratcr City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: Enclosed please find the original signed Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return for the BDP Sewer Main Easement. Please be in touch with any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA obert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosure cc: Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (w/o enclosure) t KESSEL/DU. .1 CORPORATION 30 KIMBALL AVE., SUITE 101, S. BURLINGTON, VT 05403 dk, 1 (802) 862-7600 - fax (802) 862-1932 - www.kesselduff.comm TRANSMITTAL TO: City of South Burlington Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator DATE Project Na 3/8/2000 9914 Project IDX Campus Expansion Subcontractor 0 WE ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER WE ARE SENDING THE FOLLOWING: COPIES NUMBER DESCRIPTION CODE 1 Easement for sewer main located along South border of property I CODE: A FOR INITIAL APPROVAL B FOR FINAL APPROVAL C APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION REQUIRED D APPROVED AS NOTED - RESUBMISSION NOT REQUIRED N 0 REMARKS: CC: Mr. Ron Roberts, BDP Mr. Bob Rushford, Gravel and Shea E DISAPPROVED - RESUBMIT F QUOTATION REQUESTED ._ G APPROVED H FOR APPROVAL I AS REQUESTED OR REQUIRED J FOR USE IN ERECTION K LETTER TO FOLLOW L FOR FIELD CHECK M FOR YOUR USE BY: Bra Carter AUG-21-2000 MON Oa o 01 PH ST `TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 8028T52 P. 01 /09 STITZEL,1'AGI & FLETCHER, P.C. A'ri'ORNEYS AT LAW 171 RATTFRY STREET P.O. 3OX 1507 BURLINc,TO-N, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 6160-2555 (V010Errnn) STPV ItN V. SfITZEL FAX (802) 4604Sn or 660-9119 )OSH I1 S. WLEAN PATTI R. FALIV a -MAIL, (FrRM:555;ii,FIRN$FI .f:OWQ TIMOTHY M, L'U5TAC% k()Itt;M•1E. FLfira vil WRITER'S E-ti1A11, (LI-1'K1ACFr;i.FIRMSPF'.Ct )M1 MIA KAkYONIDES ('ALSO Ar)M1'rTro IN N Y) WRITER'S FAX (802) 560 2552 AMANDA B.C. LAVII ATY FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHSFIT mate: A:tlgust ' 1, 2000 To: James D. Foloy, l?sq. Fax: 863-2859 Re: Plaza Investments Drainage Easement Sender: Tilt, Bustace You should receivc 9 Page(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the panes, please call (802) 660-2555. MES SAGE Jim -Transmitted herewith is a copy of my May 25, 2000 correspondence fbr your reference. Please let [ne know the status of your review of this matter. Thank you, Cc: Ray Belair This mcssnc is intended only fa'ncc use of the nddruysnu tmd tnay contain informa)!on that i; privileged and confidential. If you arc not the intundad reci)5ie0, you are hereby notitied that any dimeminr:tion of this communlcation is strictly prohibited. Il'you have received ihis con)munlwdon in urror, plunse no ify us hnlncdimcly by tciephonu (802-660-2555) Thank you HUG-21-2000 MON 03 '01 PM S� TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 802PP,02552 P. 02/09 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BUR INGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2$:$ (VOICE�TDD) 5 MN F. STIML FAX (M) 660-2552 or 660-9110 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE" E-1.,wL(FIRM255WMMSPRCOM) ""BLUR W. CERNOSIA Konj%jr E FLETC]VA WRITER'S E-"L (CEUSTACECOIRMSPF COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEhN TIMDM-lY M WSTACE MIA KARVO'N1DI:-9 AMANDA 5 $, LAFFERTY (*ALSO A7DMITTI•:0 IN N.Y.) May 25, 2000 aatnes D. Foley, Esq. SvokeS Foley PLC 299 South Union Street PO Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 RE. Holmes Road Extension Dear Jim: I an writing to follow up with you regarding the above - captioned matter. I have reviewed your previous correspondence and marked -up version of the easement with the City. I apologize for the confusion on the. Offer of Dedication issue. When I sent those draft documents to you I -was not entirely clear about the chain of ownership on that side of the road. Upon further preview, the portion of Holmes Road Extension currently under construction is almost entirely on the BDP portion of the future right-of-way. As such, the City has decided to record the Blodgett/Milot Warranty Deed, leaving only the drainage issue xezaining with plaza Investments. I have revised the Storm Drainage Easement as you requested, with one notable exception. T have not added reciprocal indemnification language that you requested. The purpose of that provision in the deed was to protect the City for actions or inactions of Plaza Investments, or its agents, employees, etc. within the City's right -of --way. I do not see the need for the city to provide Plaza Investments with indemnification for work within its own public street. Please give me a call after you have had a chance to review the proposed document with your client. I have also enclosed a copy of the Krebs & Lansing plan, as requested. 'Thank you again for your patience. I look forward to nearing from you. S ince Tinothy H. Eustace THE/bi 1 Enclosure CC. Raymond Belair (w/o plan) AUG-21-2000 MON 03:02 PM STITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 302A;Q2552 P. 03/09 STORM DRAINAGE; EASEMENT DRAFT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY TH95N PRESENTS, that the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation located in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and state of Vermont (Grantors), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents do hereby GIVr, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont limited partnership situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual non-exclusive right and easement, twenty feet (20' ) in uniform width, for the purposes of laying, installing, constructing, reconstructing, operating, repairing, maintaining, removing, restoring and/or replacing an underground storm drainage pipe, 'together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of Grantors' property situated in the City of South Burlington, county of Chittenden, State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more specifically described as follows; Being a strip of land twenty feet (241) in uniform width across the Holmes Road 'Extension right-of-way, centered on the existing storm drainage line. said storm drainage line is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volu'ne , Page �^ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Dead of BDP Realty Associates, dated and recorded in Volume Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and Quitclaim Deed of Plaza Investments dated and recorded in Volume , Page of said Land Records. U-21-2000 MON 03;03 PM STT ZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 802'q V559 P, 04!09 The purpose of this storm drainage easement and a contemporaneous Quitclaim Deed from Plaza Investments to the city of south Burlington is to establish a storm drainage easement across the entire width of the Holmes Road right-of-way in favor of Plaza Investments, its successors and assigns, and to establish the rights and responsibilities in and to said storm drainage pipeline among the parties. Reference is hereby made to the above --mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall be authorized to install, construct, operate, use, maintain, repair and replace a storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, under the traveled portion of the Holmes Road Extension right-of- way; provided, however, that any repair, by said Grantee or its successors and assigns shall be initiated and undertaken only with the advance written consent of Grantor, its successors or assigns, and provided further that such entry shall be reasonably necessary to the purpose hereof and shall be performed in such a manner as to cause as little disruption of traffic as is feasible under the circumstances. Granter, its successors and assigns, shall have no right to make use of the surface of Grantor's property lying above said promises except as set forth in the preceding sentence and in common with the general. public. Grantee expressly covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor and its successors and assigns, from all costs, liability, damage or expense, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, caused by or resulting from the actions or inactions of the agents, employees, contractor's and subcontractors of Grantee and its successors and assigns, on or W AUG-21-2000 NON 33:03 ?N STiTZEL FACE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 302PF02552 F, 05/09 about the property of Grantor; and further agrees that any damage to the property to Grantor caused by or resulting from the exercise and use of the aforesaid easement and right-of-way and associated rights by Grantee and its successors and assigns shall be promptly repaired at the cost of Grantee, or its successors and assigns, as is then in title to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant, and the upon completion of any construction activity by or on behalf of the Grantee or its successors and assigns, such of Grantee, its successors or assigns as is then entitled to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant shall restore the surface of the easement area, and any other lands or premises affected by such construction, as nearly as reasonably practicable to the condition existing prior to such construction. Grantor, its successors and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way and easement at all times and in a manner such as shall not be inconsistent with the intended use of the right -of. -way and easement by Grantee, its successors and assigns. Grantee acknowledges that the surface area of the right-of- way and easement being conveyed herein is utilized as a public street of the City. it agrees that it shall, during any construction, .reconstruction, repair or replacement of the storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, keep open to the general circulation of vehicles at all times at least one lane of traffic of sufficient width and of adequate surface for vehicles to proceed above the area of construction in both a easterly and westerly direction in a reasonably convenient manner. Grantee agrees that it shall at all tames during its 3 AUG-21-2000 MON 03:04 ?N FTITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 80?�O,2552 P. 06/09 construction activities within the rights -of -way and easement herein conveyed, at its sole expense, adequately control motor vehicle and pedastrian traffic on and over the traveled portion of Holmes Road. Grantee agre®s that its construction of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be accomplished in such a mariner that there is no resulting undermining of, or insufficient support for, the traveled portion of Holmes Road above such right-of-way and easamant. If Grantor, its successor or assign, determines that such undermining or insufficient support for the traveled portion of Holmes Road results from construction by the Grantee within the right-of-way and easement herein conveyed, the Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole expense, make all necessary repairs, replaosments, modifications, etc., to achieve such proper support for the traveled road surface. Grantee further agrees that it shall so design and construct storm drainage pipe and associated facilities and shall so reconstruct the traveled portion of Holmes Road that surface water will not accumulate on the replaced traveled portion of Holmes Road but, shall be adequately and efficiently drained and carried from the traveled portion of the street. Grantee acknowledges that Holmes .Road is a street — feet in width and that the paved traveled portion thereof occupies approximately _.feet of such _ foot width. Grantee agrees that should it be necessary for the City in the futxire to widen the paved portion of said Holmes Road within said v foot right--of- way, all improvements erected or constructed by the Grantee in connection with the construction and use of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be. relocated to the extent 4 AUG-21-2000 MCN !03:�74 PM CTT�TGE PAGE FLETCHER PG FAX NO, 80P"Q2552 P. 07/09 required for the proper functioning of said widened Holmes Road at the Citv's sole expanse. This right-of-way and easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any and all storm drainage pipelines and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easenent herein conveyed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD eaid granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors, for themselve-s- and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owner of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENGUXBRMCL; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans, deeds and records thereof, all in further aid of this description. IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this IN THE PRESENCE 0Ft (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHI TTENDEN , SS. day of , 2000. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By. Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, in said County and State this day of , 2000, personally appeared , as duly authorized agent of the cITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before fie, 5 AUG-211-20V "!1';a j6:05 PM ST:! ZEL Pa(E FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 302PR02552 P. 08/09 required for the proper functioning of said widened Holmes Road at the City's sole expense. This right-o -way and easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any and all storm drainage pipelines and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement: '.erein conveyed. To RAPE ARID To HOLD said granted premises, with all the privilegea and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors, for themselves and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole -)wner of the premises and have good right and title to convey the .Name in the manner aforesaid, that it is PREE FROM EVERY `MUMBRANCE; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DZFEND the ame against all lawful claims whatever. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans, deeds And records t.hareof, all in further aid of this description. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of :IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) SPATS Or VMMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. 2000. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DR Aff By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, in said County and State this day of , 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he_ acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed o` the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, 5 AUG-21-2000 MON 03:06 PM STTTZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 8020 1 2552 P. 09%09 Notary Pu ,1—� --�� My Commission Expires: Son 16'7 . 11P.A — CL Received Recorded of so. Burlington Atteljt: ___ _ _ Margar, STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHE11, P.C. ArrORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATPPRY s'raPET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0540'L1507 I%K'S OFFICE 3� amp at!;::�M on page 39 and Records AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION i �Ag moment made this day of _ 2000 by and rA ard,Citytween BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on October 28, 1986, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the "1986 Krebs Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the 1986 Krebs Survey required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1998, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated July 30, 1998, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the 111998 Krebs Survey"), which approval included the subdivision of Holmes Road Extension from the portion of the property consisting of 1400 Shelburne Road; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City lands depicted on the 1998 STIT'LEL, PAGE &. Pi.E'CciiEft, P.C. A170RNEYS AT LAW 171 BA'17F,RY S'CRF:ET E'O, IION 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05 W2-I507 Krebs Survey as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington Area = 0.875 acres, Volume 261, Page 125-128, April 26, 1988"; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc,, et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999 (the "Trudell Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the Trudell Survey contains a condition that the Owner shall execute and deliver to the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed extension of IDX Drive (a/k/a Holmes Road Extension); and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands included within the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, Y.C. ATTORNEYS A'r LAW 171 BA'rrcRY s,rREPYr P 0. BOX 1507 BURLINGPON. VERMONT 05,102-)507 WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the portion of the Holmes Road Extension depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Warranty Deeds together convey all of the land covered by the Irrevocable Offer and the Deed which land is being conveyed in two parcels by the Replacement Warranty Deeds at the request of the City. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. S'1'['1'ZIsL. PAGE &. FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CO_ SOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERNIONT 05401-1f,07 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: BDP RE ASSOCIATES re -- By: Witness is Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Jpuj"A DUr11hq-Ppj in said County and State, this da of C 2000, personally appeared iSIC IN ff. nYyq as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, �&Jw;'2 Notary Public - My Commission expires: IN PRESENCE OF: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON —% By: t ess Its Duly Autho ized Agent STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. AWORNMYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VE:RNION'r 05102 1a07 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At SD, j j> , in said County and State, this day o , 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BUR INGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. B e f e m , Nota6ag 1111f-e,, ry P blic My Commission expires Son170.bdpfinalversion.rea � DnCU ENT CITY Received ` Recorded ina Of So. Burlinc Attest: Mac srri ZEL, PAGE & FLE111' HEn, P.C. ATFORNKYS AT LAW 171 ❑A'1"PI:ItY 9'I'HI?I 'P P.U. Bt)X 1507 I3IlRIANGTON, VERMONT 0!iA02-1507 LEEKS OFFICE. ) -)o -�I� at,).- P M `i'1'2 on page -N n Land Records REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED rt:C�)ulc�rPicard, City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely, GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 69" 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. STITZEL, PAGE & F1,1:'I'CIIER, P.C. AITORNI;YS AT LAW 171 RATI'ERY STREET PA), BOX 1GII7 BURLINGTON, VEAWONT 05402 1507 Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: a Imp X (Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: attsuly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At &II-N&, in said County, this ... �j day of �� e 2000 personally appeared �j jgy Ta XIAI , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, e _ Notary Public My Commission Expires:.-;? Son"112.1nivrsn.rr_a Vermnnt Property Transfer Tax 32) V.`..A. Ck� 231 S I GEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. A170RN 1 YS AT LA W 171 It,t I I ICY 51'R IiL"I' L.O. 110X 1507 I SURLINGTON, VIIHMONT 0`, 102 1507 3 STi,rZEL, PAGE & FLETMER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY tiPREE'T P-O- RUN 1.507 1301 I.1NGTON, VEE NIO:NT 05IW! 1507 EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 17113ATTFRY SPRFET P_O. BOX 1507 BURLINGPON. VERMONT 054021507 Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES F, Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son l72a.LLnd]Versi.on.rp,t sT[TZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. AWORNEYS AT LAW I71 B,a•1�r1•:1cr srer•.r; r P.O- BOX 1507 BUBLINGTON, VI•:I[MONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 sTYrzEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STRE.1"T P.O. BOX 1 507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05408-1507 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 00150" W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 3411 W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 3311211 E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. STITZEL, PACE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTUItM:YS AT LA W 171 R:1ITERY STRF ET P.O. BOX V,07 BURLINGTON, VI'; Rptl)NP 05 102 )W7 Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) EDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Un 2 Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son 1'/2.bfinaIversion .rea STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHI P R, P.C. ATTORNEYS A,r LAW 17t RA'1711,RY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VCRMONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STRELT P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE'ADD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-91 19 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL (FIRM2555(dFIRMSPF_COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE(a)FIRMSPF.COM) ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 June 29, 2000 Raymond Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: BDP Realty Associates - Holmes Road Extension Dear Ray: JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S E. LAFFERTY Enclosed for your file is a copy of the Offer of Dedication, Exhibits and Replacement Warranty Deed recently recorded in the Land Records. Please let me know your thoughts on Bob Rushford's question regarding recording fees. My recollection is that the City typically does not charge recording fees in situations where the City is obtaining a property interest from the owner. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosure son4355.cor GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telrpbone 802.668.0220 Faroimilr 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@gravelshea.com Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 June 28, 2000 Re: BDP Realty Associates/IDX Expansion Dear Tim: Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Robert H. Rushford Clarke A. Gravel Charles T. Shea Of Cnan..r! Norman Williams Sprcia( C.wa.v! Leigh Polk Cole Johan WE. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Andrew D. Manitskya aAd.aitlyd nn(y in Nr Yark Enclosed please find a copy of the dedication documents that were recorded in the South Burlington Land Records for Holmes Road Extension. Also enclosed is an invoice we received from the City Clerk. Do we need to pay the invoice (i.e., since it was for the recording of the City's dedication documents)? Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosures cc: Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (w/o enclosures) Molly Lebowitz, Esq. (w/enclosures) 9 2000 + - ..L 'CIT CL Received Reworded in r�► _ C` 50. guriington Alta' t' -__.. n Margan STITZEL, PAGE. & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTORNF.YS AT LAW I"I R.ArrERY n-MEET 110 BOX Iso- HL RLINGTO\'. %'ERMONT ns.os-iso; RK,S OFr^ICE 010 at�M on page3&%''Z7 and Records AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION i Ag Rment made this �1 day of 2000 by and A. Picard, City e between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on October 28, 1986, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the 111986 Krebs Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the 1986 Krebs Survey required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1998, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated July 30, 1998, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the 111998 Krebs Survey"), which approval included the subdivision of Holmes Road Extension from the portion of the property consisting of 1400 Shelburne Road; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission recLuired Owner to convey to the City lands depicted on the 1998 STITZEL. PAGF, & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1:1 It \TTF:HY 1rHF:F:T V0 It(1\ I!M7 Ii LH!.IM:TON, VF: II\II1\T Krebs Survey as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington Area = 0.875 acres, Volume 261, Page 125-128, April 26, 1988"; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999 (the "Trudell Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the Trudell Survey contains a condition that the Owner shall execute and deliver to the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed extension of IDX Drive (a/k/a Holmes Road Extension); and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands included within the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; ST1T"LE1.. PAGE & FLETCHE:R. P.C. ATTO[IN F:YS AT LAW 171 11:\17K10 STREK7 PO BOX L',07 WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the portion of the Holmes Road Extension depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Warranty Deeds together convey all of the land covered by the Irrevocable Offer and the Deed which land is being conveyed in two parcels by the Replacement Warranty Deeds at the request of the City. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. STITZEL, PAGE & F FETCHER. P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 H:\Tit:HS'.'MWE.T PCHLINGTON. VKHMONT 06a02-1507 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: BDP RE ASSOCIATES By : Witness s Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At : (nwrA 1)U61h1t 1 , in said County and State, this 1j� da o C V, 2000, personally appeared FRZ�06 tf, ayya as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the -free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. . Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: IN PRESENCE OF: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON �U. By: C�..l / 4 ,, �-_ �Titness Its Duly Autho ized Agent r STIT'M., PAGE & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTUR\F.YS AT L,\kt 171 ti vmI ,H1'.; rH r:r:r 8 i.m.i%urw, vr:ll.uu\r 11:,40.1 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. in said County and State, this day o.4 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BUR INGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Bef e m , Notary P blic , My Commission expires �• iQ - Q� Son.7p.�cc__nalvers_on. rea T ►n r) DnrIJ!JN�ENT STITZFI.. PAGE B FLETCHER. P.C. Al'TORNEYS AT LAW ICI 1iATTERY a'T'R t:ET 111. RLINGTON %F. 11%40%T EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be ., conveyed. STITZEL, PAGF. & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 M.{77F,RY STREET PU. BOX 1W_1 H1: R L I N G TON. V K R M 0 NT 05a0y150, Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereur_tc.set�- its hand this dad- of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: (Witness) 2 Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. _c.._72a. f ina.vers i on. rea STITZF_L. PAGE K FLETCHF 11. P.C. ATTOftXF.YS AT LAW 171 H AITt:H1':TREET 1.0 RI)\ „I: a1.1�,,'n,�. V'ERMONT 1'a7 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 T[TZLI., PAGE & FLETCHEH. P.C. A—M RNEYS AT LAIC c; ❑A*M:RY %TRFFT Pn uO.t i.-,o- uc+v_:1a7 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430., Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 72" 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 00150" W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 34" W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 33112" E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. STITZE1., PAGE FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW r.i iivm:ii% srritvvr PO i+ox 1o0- i+� ui.ncTii�, cr:e�+n�T os.vsisu- Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of . 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: 2 Its Duly Authorized Agent STIT'LEL. PAGE & FLF:"iCllt{R. P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1-1 11:\'1'1'F:It\71 k'.ET 1'f1 BOX 1:.11" li 111A%GT0%, l'F: 11\IOVI OS U*-' I'.I)7 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires:_ 3 CITY LERA'S OFFICF Received �9 at o"l- P M Recorded in `l"? "1 on page - y C` So Bu,lingt n Land Records es4. REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED At� `c`n� T�r Ma' icard. City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS STIT7.EL. PAGE. & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 F1 %7TERY.'TRF.FT PO Rur 1:,0- ❑t R1.1%GTON. %F.R\ll INT W 111. 15R' BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N*180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER. P.C. ATPOR\EYS AT LAW 17: BAMAZY rnet:r I•A. MIX I:14)7 H At IAM;T0%. vracXwNT os4ns taut Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hard this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: . (witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: aTtsuly Authorized Agent oil STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At 4 �, in said County, th's �raylaA ay of �u}1 e 2000 personally appeared %�j iqy � Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Publi!-4�01-203- My Commission Expires: Son;72._n1•..sn.rea Vermont Proper,;, Transfer Tax 32'J.S.A. 1 1 , t .. STIT7.EL. PAGE R FLETCHER. P.C. Al—OREPS .AT LAk n N=vi v s'rnt:r: r 3 GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Fac.,imile 802.658.1456 www. gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@grayshea.com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: June 16, 2000 Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Robert H Rushford Clarke A. Gravel Charles T. Shea Of Couneel Norman Williams Speeial Couneel Leigh Polk Cole Johan WE. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Andrew D. Manitsky• *Admitted only in New Y,,k Enclosed please find the following original documents which have been executed by BDP Realty Associates for the revised dedication of Holmes Road Extension: 1. Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. 2. Replacement Warranty Deed (for the westerly half of Holmes Road Extension). 3. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return for the above Deed. 4. Replacement Warranty Deed (for the remaining half of Holmes Road Extension). 5. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return for the above Deed. GRAVEL AND SHEA Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator June 16, 2000 Page 2 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please be in touch with any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosures cc: Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. (w/enclosures) Molly Lebowitz, Esq. (w/enclosures) Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (w/o enclosures) STEVEN F. STITZEL PATTI R. PAGE* ROBERT E.FLETCHER (-ALSO ADNUTTED IN N.Y.) STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICF/TDD) FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 E-MAIL (FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 June 13, 2000 HAND DELIVERED Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street PO Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty Associates to City of South Burlington Dear Bob: JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M.EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY Enclosed please find execution ready versions of (1) the Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication with Exhibits A and B; (2) Replacement Warranty Deeds; and (3) Vermont Property Transfer Tax Returns. Following execution by your client, please return the originals to me for execution by the City and recording in the Land Records, or send the documents directly to Ray Belair with a copy to my office. Please give me a call with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerel 1 Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosures cc: Raymond Belair Molly Lebowitz, Esq. Son4334.cor STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of 2000 by and between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on October 28, 1986, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the 111986 Krebs Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the 1986 Krebs Survey required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1998, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated July 30, 1998, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. (the 111998 Krebs Survey"), which approval included the subdivision of Holmes Road Extension from the portion of the property consisting of 1400 Shelburne Road; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City lands depicted on the 1998 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Krebs Survey as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington Area = 0.875 acres, Volume 261, Page 125-128, April 26, 1988"; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999 (the "Trudell Survey"); and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission of the Trudell Survey contains a condition that the Owner shall execute and deliver to the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed extension of IDX Drive (a/k/a Holmes Road Extension); and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands included within the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0540E-1507 WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the portion of the Holmes Road Extension depicted on the 1986 Krebs Survey, the 1998 Krebs Survey and the Trudell Survey; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer; and WHEREAS, the Replacement Warranty Deeds together convey all of the land covered by the Irrevocable Offer and the Deed which land is being conveyed in two parcels by the Replacement Warranty Deeds at the request of the City. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. STITZEI., PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0590E-1507 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: IN PRESENCE OF: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Witness Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Son170.bdpfinalversion.rea STITZEL, PAGE. & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET Y.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET Y.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 3311211 W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 0214711 E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. STITZEI., PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172a.finalversion.rea STITZEL, PAGE & FLE TCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 00150" W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 34" W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 33112" E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONP 05402-1507 Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.bfinalversion.rea STITZF.L, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET BO. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 18' 0015011 W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 3411 W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 3311211 E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT I.AW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Its Duly Authorized Agent L STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.finalversion.rea STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 0540&1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 3311211 W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 1507 Meaning and intending to convey the westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: (Witness) Its Duly Authorized Agent F STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.fn1vrsn.rea STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. BDP Realty Association 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 U BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO, City of South Burling --on 575 Dorset Street South Burlin otn, VT 05403 036002712 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING Holmes Road Extension INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. [S FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 112 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. E EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH la TOTAL ACREAGE BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.❑-11 STORE 2. El FACTORY 6. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT ) DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME NUMBER DESCRIBE 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERTR ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUM BE CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONES: 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ 9. OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE f 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): Public- 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP/VACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ® OTHERRoadWay DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes 0 No IF TRANSFER IS FXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. 2 TOTAL 12 PRICE PAID FOR • PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID S 0.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY S 0.00 IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: a TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS S 0.00 • DATE SELLER ACQUIRED 7/ 1 9 7 9 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 1 (CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE TOWNICITY DATE OF RECORD _ BOOK NUMBER LISTED VALUE S PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK PAGE NO. GRAND LIST OF 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REOUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Form PT-1 (1292) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rats Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to excoa l S100,000) (See Instructions) ........................................... _............... 1. a $ b. Value of property enrollsd In current use program ..... .............................. _......................................................................... ........ b. S C. Value of quallfled working form .............................................. .... ...... .......... .................................................. ........................ c. S d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)...................................................................................................._......................................................... d. $ a. Tax rate..........................................................................................................._............................................................................_... e. 1. Tax due on Special Auto Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)............................................................................................ 1. S 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line 0 on front of return................................................................................................................................. 2. a S b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above .... _............................................................................................................ b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(s)....................................... .......... ....................................... ..._...................................................... c. S d. Tax rats............................................................................................................................................................................................ d. e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Llns P on front of return.... ................................................... I ................. 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buysr(s) and Seller(*) certify as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every parry to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, 11 any, affecting the property. B. That the sellers) advised the buyer(s) that local and state building regulations, Toning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use o the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and la In compliance with sold permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number D- 1 000 Number of acres b. Parcel rstalned. Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Sellers) further certifles as follows: D. That this transfer of real pprope and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's land Use and Development Low (Act 250), for frty he following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. 4 C 0 3 9 1 and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer does/does not (strike one) result in a partition or division of land. Note: It It does, an AM 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. F of WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION Buyers) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. 2. Buyer(s) certifies that the partles obtained withholding certificate n of Taxes In advance of this sale. from the Commissioner ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no additions r consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE I BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE RDP-Realty 7Cityof South Burlington B • I By: Its Duly Authorized Agent 11Zts Duly Authorized Agent ' Pre arers PSignature_Prepared Stitzei, Page & Fletcher, PC Preparer'sAddress PO BOX 1507, Burlington, by Timothy M. Eustace Buyer'sRepresentative Tel. (Print or Type) we o wWy -, „> o, ,v, yew yen J'VS. VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. BLIP Realty Association 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 13 BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURrrY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. City of South Burling -on 575 Dorset Street South Burlin otn, VT 05403 036002712 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) DATE OF CLOSING Holmes Road Extension 1NTERES7 IN PROPERTY 1. FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. 1 J EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH la TOTAL ACREAGE BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALLTHAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.0 STORE I 2. ❑FACTORY 6. ❑ DWELLING UNITS MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( INSERT ) lO.LJ-I OTHER TRANSFERRED 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑ MOBILE HOME NUMBER DESCRIBE 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED NUM BE R CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED D RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE s2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): Public 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ® OTHERRoadWay DESCRIBE Deb CRIeE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes I29 No IF TRANSFER IS FXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. 2 TOTAL 10 PRICE PAID FOR a PRICE PAID FOR 0.00 0.00 PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY $ REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS I S 0.00 • DATE SELLER ACOUIRED 7/ 1 9 7 9 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 1 (CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE N0, LISTED VALUE 3 GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REOUIRED, ACT 25.0 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK Form PT-1 (12 92) RATE SCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal residence (not to exceed 5100,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1. a S b. Value of property enrolled In cunerd use program...................................................................................................................... b. S C. Value of qualified working term ..................................... .................................. ........ ........... ............................... .......................... c. S d. Add Unto 1(a), (b) and (c)........... .................................................................................................................................................._ d. S a. Tax rate.........................................................................................................................................................................................»... e. 1. Tax dua on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(*).............................. »....................................................... .... 1. $ 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line 0 on front of return................................................................................................................................. 2. a. $ b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Asia Schedule above ................................................. _............................................................... b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(s).................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. d. e. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. S 3. Total Tax Due: AddLines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES 1 11 Buyer(*) and Seller(&) certlfy, as follows: A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, It any, affecting the property. B. That the seller s advised the buyer(*) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer is In compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and Is in compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exsmption Number D- 1 000 Number of acres b. Parcel rstalned: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seiler(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of real pproperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. 4 C 0 3 9 1 and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer kkil"/does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: It It does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ❑ 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this Is a transfer without consideration. (See instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETETO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BDP RealtyI City of South Burlington B • I g . Its Duly Authorized Agent I ZNts Duly Authorized A ent <-/ Prepa►er'sSignature ? L— C Preparedby Timothy M. Eustace Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, PC Prepa►er'sAddress PO BOX 1507, Burlington, Buyer's Representative Tel. VT 05402 (Print or Type) —Vc , 0 LUNY v1 crq reLUrn TQr your recuras_ KAY-25-00 THU 11 17 A14 EEaE�,7AN ELf"IRIC IDIC, A 05/25,f2000 11:22 F91 B558 FAX NO, 5OZ5739457 11 Im-.1 FIOI-564 GAZADC-- qr Aft� ALL) MI WUM MAOrr ARM CAJ'r- OW ' Li. M I ?A W& ZSCA7— CA vVA-M LANAr 5,0 R G '5 ' Q; i-rr Ptx-m ,9,4%AL- MO-knlNJCO TYPICAL 3TREET LIQHT WIP.•;-15-J'C T ,� i 1 AIT, i:EEEIJAN ELECTRiG INF aP.h N0, 8C B799457 05i25l2000 1E;2.3 FAI 653k FINANCEQfiB —��. wl OF'U 051 �.,,, rER ui{ U.._ ea "a U6 T POUR WrN M(E MMT Mild — 32' BN25•18 T T .�. 20 22' 85 '� A9 ', 6b 75 32` 32" 2.9 1 B 85530.18 ..1 25 28' 91 ��(, B'R 78 75 31- 2E` 128 4% D% _ 78 TS 33` 3S' 3.7 ' 8W3O 38 25 30 33' 105 4 9+/s 79 7b 2.1 $ BS3S tiB 33' 149 a U 75 3,2" 30 3.2' r2B' 11Z 4T, 25 Eli 66 75 25 28` 181 a� 8'fi 7d 75 3,Y" ' $.2' 3,2' BX3a 2 ^$} kr-7 _.. i .ri AV i eX 78 7.$ 32' 2.3 1.2 $}i33.28 LENGTH tS. r't1WDAAD GliNSTPUCt+ON 6Fi-!-i51+VY UlJilr ()aqS'TALJCToUN U poles art IAGi•+s Aty wraOgt3. F1areC bw is hs'aaas n swbu' y, h�rnwwm Cda, Orpmrnlred wire acce35 hop asid Zred 2'h" x 3" iid add Exzrdaf*i. a sr •Facts `s �S R�:.7�t 3� EPA t5 33 4 ►s Fpa M r�iC M °K `76S SW W4r la D� mugs r CDT, t n'i, KAY-25-00 THU 11:10 Lk HEC'PM ELECTDI j INIJ FA'Y, NO. 602R799457 - o5r25/2000 11:24 FAX 6558, FINANCE_ Q 007 r • Cox*•a0142041iar■a■a! /Ra Aat2:11a■man fsaid' itia aaa■■a■aoil R allilRRaex[m!lid!A1s.9018i�� ■ , ■ i rm��iii�e�R��rrR ass ingiltlli�i%!f t It i lgll*NAMMM4,11:240 no am"ONNNu fn: r ■a■IRQVA H•■•H■tatr■■riits■uyftltaasM aR■R .:r;T'ar .+r'�_'' "-_;'. ma an �fiiiaf�i � sir aWR Ns`i��1911 my ■■oolfa/r!1 ■■�/�■faR/ta aii+r :] i i- + - .. ■.■ . !M r■'IxOs■./asellral■o■! -:,- ...,..:,.,r:•.:t�: ;�.,,. �:.:,., ■■a�a�aa�aa Rliaafu•a� a ■■ ■ ■a!! am !a/mlraamRr" //■ra// ■Q■■ K��KIN ■a.M■� ta/rliRiii K �� iut i '� i iix4am ■HMAa//.+�sali/!■■l�Iillii��/Ailtt■ �rtaa!•.Ir■! + !■t!■ aaR/fR WOARa/amoms /a an ■ ailrf /i■ Rosam s aiIt lstiaa■ii■asteam itf c • a �.r a •- *� • a r To■fr /r!//. t!#Ya.�■/aR■�ao�aR■Wtl�aM1raRa• ■aaS/■��tfi/HI■�I■ilMo■!�MR■1�MIKfaAmHafita■ i!/■a��ta iRmaiu■ maa!1R�■.�` ■■fa Odom ■raam/■ a %s!■■!iMa Mal /R a !• ma■:m■a/a ilif salimana:- a+ ?r ! • WON din fa t t � C ■ not {!!Z A" •• • • _r • USE TABLE " OPI APPR t. _ I r 1Li-25-00 'iri'J 11:12 Alta EEGEb�nl1 ELECTRIC I111G rA?; N0. 502R799457, F. Ap' I z 0A2 POWRIOOOW LUMINAIRE WITH CUTOFF OPTICS APPLICATIONS esid®ntial streets, access roads and parking lots where light trespass could be a problem ' SPECIFICATION FEATURES • Powr/Module ballast assembly • Filtered optics • Universal four -bolt slipfitter • Die�cast aluminum housing with electrocoat gray paint finish • Adjustable mogul base socket (street side) • ALGLASO finish on reflector • No -tool PE receptacle • Plug-in ignitor • True 900 cutoff —no light above 901 • External stainless steel bail latch • GSA Certified unit available, contact factory • Standard construction is 1P55 • Twin -pack and multi -pack packaging available - Sea Pago 6980 ORDERING NUMBER LOGIC MZAC 1M�3 1 F r PRODUCT II LIGHT BALLAST PE !LENS IES DISTRi- ID WATTAGE SOURCE VOLTAGE TYPE FUNCTION I TYPE BUTION TYPE FILTER CPTICN$t XXUIX XX X X X X X X X X X XXX MAC = 03 w 50 3 = HPS 021201209! See Ballast t - Nene See See ` 1= Fiber FWFusingn M-250A2 07 a 70 M = MH 2401277 Selection Table 2 - PE Recop-I Photometric Photometric; gasket (Not with Cutoff 10 = 100 C = Marc Multivott A-Autoreg tecle I Selection 2= charcoal avall- Srlection Optics 1s=150 WAT = 00mm i66Vi Standard: 1=120 1C=Mirc•Rig 10 = Mag-Reg with NOTE:i�, Table Table i A = Acrylic, with able elastome with Dia" Past 11 171 Lamp not included 2 = 20B 3 :240 Grounded ceptaclo I I ( connected Clear gasket multivoa Top Mount ZO = 200 I ing (BiBbst 121 - 1001 pocket Shell 4.277 H - NPF Rcoctor same voltage Olooa as unit except G - Glass, j ovolras9l I mounted in 150 3.4B0 or Leg as noted, fiat i I top housing - (55V) 7=12OX29 J M = Mag•Rcg Order PIE I L = Pclyear- 25 ■ 260 r{ L:P'20"Wor2o�. 8 = 240 V fd = NPP Reactor. Ballast Control bonate separately- Clear 71 = 701 100 or Lag 120V PE P ■ CWI with Globe NOTE: tac a not i RGC'OGrounded NOTE: Use Duel i Socket Teton Shell i 150watit maximum wattage connected notable with Acrylic for tower D' 347 clear globe. ! F=12OX347 { _wa� NOTE- DualvoaI s =short I i. ! conneeccted M=Medium k% for lower voltage +C = Cutoff m wakr.r•a rr.•..,px or a.w�u ero•ffm co.�psny 2 Type II Dsts rntj to chaars wM+ow RAri&s - ' Type l I l 6 j MAY-31-2000 WED 11:32 AM ST TZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 502� j552 P. 02/14 STITZEL, PAGE &. F1,F,-jV1.1ER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BA' fl'ERY S110ai1 1) (). BOX 15(17 BURLING ON, VE'.RMONT 05402.1507 M11) 660-2555 (\'0iCFJ7DD) 57I;VEN F. STITZEL FAX (202) 660-2551 , G60.4119 QSU11I S. McLSM PATTI It PA(;!,' F'MA1I.OIRM1555gyFIIWhPF.COM) TIMOTItY r,i, SUST'A(,v R01EATF,FLETC11C•R WRITER'S E-MAIL (fFIISiA( I�i�)14RMSPf.COM} MIAKARVONIDGS I'ALNO A0,M) f 1 PO IN N 1k I WR I MR'$ FAX (902) 660-2552 AN 4NDA S C. f.Alp lilt."'.'V May 31, 2000 YI&_FWSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MATL Molly X. Lebowitz, Esq. Dinse., Knapp & McAndrew 209 Battery Street Po Box 988 Burlington, VT 05402-0988 Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel And Shea 76 St. Paul Street PO Box 369 Burlington, VT' 0540-2--03-GG9 RE:: BDR Realty Associates -- Holmes Road Extension Dear Molly and Bob: Enclosed please find revised, black -line versions of the Amended Offer of Dedication and Replacement 'Warranty Deeds for the BDP Realty portion of the Holmes Extension. I have incorporated the changes requested by Molly in her May 24, 2000 lottor, with one elceeption. I have not ib%. ludea = 4.afa.Lui uu Lu the September 9, 1991, Warranty Deed from South Burlington to BDP Realty Associates (Vol 317, Page 210). In that conveyance to BDP, the City reserved for itself a twenty-four foot by forty foot parcel, which lies within the Holmes Road Extension right-of- wny. FvL Lafd.Lwxjwe, bee paragraph :t or ttxe property description contained in the aforementioned 'Warranty Deed beginning at line 8. In addition, I enclose a portion of the plan entitled "Boundary and Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated August 1986, last revised February 13, 1987, and prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. This plan clearly shows the property retained by the City in the context of this prior conveyance. Note that the plan incorrectly references Volume 126, Page 20 for the retained property (the correct reference is Volume 126, Page 289). This plan was referred to in the September 9, 1991 Warranty Deed, but was never recorded.. MAY-31-2000 WED 11:33 AM STiTZEL PACE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 802FP-n2552 P. 03/14 Molly K. Lebowitz, Esq. Robert Rushford, Esq. May 31, 2000 Verge 2 Please give me a call if you have any additional questions or comments. If the revised documents are satisfactory, I will send the originals for execution. Thank you_ Timothy M. Eustace TMF/bjl Enclosure cc: Raymond. Belair S:,:.ai75.cn: MAY-31-2000 WED 11:33 AN STiTZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 802FPn2552 F. 04/14 AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFPER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of , 2000 by and between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a. place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "city"). WI TNES S ETH WHEREAS, to October 28_,.1986, the City planning Commission approved a Site elan entitled: "Boundary Location survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 198G, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.; and WHERB.AS, the final approval of the Planning commission required Ownev tQ oQnvey to the City, lands dnpioted nn the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area a 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of SDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudel.l Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999; and WHEREAS, the final, approval of the Planning( commission contains a condition that the owner shall execute and deliver to MAY-31-2000 WED 11:34 Aft STiTZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 802PPO 552 Po 05/14 1 the City an Irrevocable offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed public roadways; and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the south Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the plat, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the city, free and clear of enaumbrameas, t%� ri%J L-uf-way ,r wa�lway dez:iu.LJbed above; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the city replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended offer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: MAY-31-2000 WED 11:34 AM STiTZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 8026CO2552 P. 06/14 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the city, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the city council. 2. The owner agrees that said A -mended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the city at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns, 4, DY executing this Amended Trrnvncnb! A nffAr n1" Dodieation, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: EDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Witness~ Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDE,N, SS. At , in said county and State, this day of 2000, personally appearQd as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public � My commission expires: MAY-31-2000 WED 11:35 AN STITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PG 1 FAX NO. 8026602552 ) P, 07/14 IN PRESENCE: OF: CITY OF SO;JTH BURLINGTON By: Witness Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CRITTENDEN, SS. At , in said County and State, this day of , 2000, personally appeared _ as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. .',uri170. cuo Before me, Notary Public My commission expires: MAY-31-2000 WED 11:35 AM STITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 8026602552 P, 08/14 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business .in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of e'en and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GavE, GRANT, SELL, M1dP T :grid %:LINFTRM unto the said uranrea ana its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, desrribeA as follows, viz - A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the city of South Burlington, Area 0.675 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, EDp Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of south Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 72" 21'26" D a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 18' 001501' W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 69° 29" 341' W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 33112" E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. MAY-31-2009 WED 11:36 AM STITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO. 8028802552 P. 09/14 Meaning and intending to convey .911 of Grantor's remainincr interest in the cat Holmes Road Extension as depicted o;i the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, tha V eovYuS acid L!se L-e.terences therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that !antil the enseal.ing of these presents it is the sole owner of the nrr�,,miser, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREES PROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEPEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES _ By: (Witness) its Duly Authorized Agent 2 MAY-31-2000 WED 11:37 AM ST M- PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX 110. 8025F02552 P. 10/14 � I STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. 6on17?. Fj. QC.-"k Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 NAY-31-2000 WED 11:37 AN STiTiEi PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 802F9,02552 P. 11./14 1 ) EXHIBIT A RSPLACFXENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that EDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, county of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLZNGTON, a Vermont municipality in the county of Chittenden and state of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GivE, GRANT, SML, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the county of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of u.s. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing consulting Engineers, Inc., dated duly 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight. line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 18 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 2913411 W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N IsQ 0214711 E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. MAY-31-21000 WED 11:38 AM STITZEL PAGE FLETC.iER FC FAX NO, 80256�2552 FR t city of 5o. a l FAX No, 1 822 658 daae " "May. •�,1AR�7 �^ � � p•th :t'rirr ryks,•: la �"P�y�'�� '��, `ti'1i1 ' :� h�y��rr�� 3t� � �14 G ;. .• : �• gig L 1 'S.�p r4y !=1: +�4ia''•� I I i i /0114 1-0011760 by of?.r lot Qreo = O t9r3 ages 126120 i i O. q8',+o 99 `ILL I , F, 12!14 i MAY-31-2000 WED 11:38 AN STMEL PACE FLETCHER PC FAX NO, 8026602552 P. 13/1, City of sm. B FAX NO- - 1 002 ISM 4748 May. -50 2000 21:07pll p2 v Miioqw by _/Soo de)"d ir&4br4V0JrY /7" p„ h AV tD ud. l�l� �� f, V1 4gmno, f proWr4y Ibc right 47Y ff"04pjpeto be sv/ f: a: Avo&x rmowwr RC viand N_ 2j 8f Gurvoyw byirb - Ond LoCd ion Sure orgv) chi ksd rc �;�, . Dato Really Assoic/Vos Pro ` 500 Shelburne RL70V KRZBS SULTING, EmIlLmEdERsi, M. 199 MAIN STREET , W1WG0tKt, VERNI ONT 05404 i sm MAY-f31' 2000 WED 11:39 AM STITZEL PAGE FLETCHER PC FAX N0, 8026602552 P. 14/14 ' M CttyofSo. B FAX NO. : 1 802 658 4748 May. 30 2000 Oi:�7PM Pi i { I t ` t ++ c/rtis �n7ver,gt survey was completed on Gcroher f a17lrta, ectrrwvc c(ialar�ce meter and a steel ramie, using !d e All bearings are -efere,acaa /® magrr0tic nar/h, sri�aich �S f5° ;Gf &a* nor/*. ;+�sl � l�r�`ginp! au/side b � Iv/s, Sd of the o�wcrod�r�d i»Orrurt�nlo o�d/d nv fs+ rccrdCe'e ir,Ver �/ �DFrv/n 6'r! is . the fallowin oyrea Wimp,pei ,e%r tY1/CU/O/ia7s , 9 r»dnumasnraPivn was useo' os rtncorr> '�+rdenC,� �, sorid steer rod found in rm/ of Irrple 30" mop/e C1E4 UVh9 ! - concr6/e rraorr, far�raa' or N,W. ec, ofRCW M elVM Hart Farr» Cil4 3 - Zl rete mon. 0`401d on old north 41M of M' R0lib' j H! 15 concraA9 ' /a&v on North rrne Or BLIP Reoii/y, G M 2 - ca ncrem man. foz,"O, at oV E, G nrn�r G'fy ref sa�v/h Burrrngtt�rJ I . 34 "Mon ,ape W/scvvey r»orker sap found sit SW Car, f CM i - conuata rrx�wi fcx r at. Sw' car. Racmes Jeep am '!`� ' -®/70 �/1f%13%GYJ /9dti0%t�` �"Or y p b Nsrfivna/ rfa rnsurpnce Co 3G% 97/aPiarrq/ Lr'fo insurance LC. Po",ty of Sou/h 126 I I ' �%a/sitar Life Jnserr�nca� Co rip, by Wehst�- - Mortrr onc. I �, - prc%ect e7a SBM dated ✓une r2, '19?.� Survey of Thomas ,xa,-ra!/ P'roaerty by merge Badarr/ /DS / Fete r4, i9a6. j Slvte 'of Vermont Q 1 f'ropa end irt�orp�n �s l of Nigh�roys , U57 Saar/# 7 f i 019-4- 6247 l'rve%�°rty P/on Hasa!/on and Frtrte f/, Shelburne Rd � Souk, �qur/r"nq/on Dy itibrren h'afxnstedn Nw 19T¢ 107 t%s Post -it' t<ax Note 7071 oa+w F 10 1141 A From JC1vpt CA, Pilo" 4 -- phvrt� Fax a -- STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY (-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) May 25, 2000 James D. Foley, Esq. Spokes Foley PLC 299 South Union Street PO Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 RE: Holmes Road Extension Dear Jim: I am writing to follow up with you regarding the above - captioned matter. I have reviewed your previous correspondence and marked -up version of the easement with the City. I apologize for the confusion on the Offer of Dedication issue. When I sent those draft documents to you I -was not entirely clear about the chain of ownership on that side of the road. Upon further review, the portion of Holmes Road Extension currently under construction is almost entirely on the BDP portion of the future right-of-way. As such, the City has decided to record the Blodgett/Milot Warranty Deed, leaving only the drainage issue remaining with Plaza Investments. I have revised the Storm Drainage Easement as you requested, with one notable exception. I have not added reciprocal indemnification language that you requested. The purpose of that provision in the deed was to protect the City for actions or inactions of Plaza Investments, or its agents, employees, etc. within the City's right-of-way. I do not see the need for the City to provide Plaza Investments with indemnification for work within its own public street. Please give me a call after you have had a chance to review the proposed document with your client. I have also enclosed a copy of the Krebs & Lansing plan, as requested. Thank you again for your patience. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincer L Timothy M. Eustace THE/bj 1 Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair (w/o plan) Son,1323.cor STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT [RAFT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation located in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (Grantors), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents do hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont limited partnership situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual non-exclusive right and easement, twenty feet (201) in uniform width, for the purposes of laying, installing, constructing, reconstructing, operating, repairing, maintaining, removing, restoring and/or replacing an underground storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of Grantors' property situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more specifically described as follows: Being a strip of land twenty feet (20' ) in uniform width across the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way, centered on the existing storm drainage line. Said storm drainage line is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deed of BDP Realty Associates, dated and recorded in Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and Quitclaim Deed of Plaza Investments dated , and recorded in Volume Page of said Land Records. 1 The purpose of this storm drainage easement and a contemporaneous Quitclaim Deed from Plaza Investments to the City of south Burlington is to establish a storm drainage easement across the entire width of the Holmes Road right-of-way in favor of Plaza Investments, its successors and assigns, and to establish the rights and responsibilities in and to said storm drainage pipeline among the parties. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall be authorized to install, construct, operate, use, maintain, repair and replace a storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, under the traveled portion of the Holmes Road Extension right-of- way; provided, however, that any repair, by said Grantee or its successors and assigns shall be initiated and undertaken only with the advance written consent of Grantor, its successors or assigns, and provided further that such entry shall be reasonably necessary to the purpose hereof and shall be performed in such a manner as to cause as little disruption of traffic as is feasible under the circumstances. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have no right to make use of the surface of Grantor's property lying above said premises except as set forth in the preceding sentence and in common with the general public. Grantee expressly covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor and its successors and assigns, from all costs, liability, damage or expense, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, caused by or resulting from the actions or inactions of the agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors of Grantee and its successors and assigns on or ON about the property of Grantor; and further agrees that any damage to the property to Grantor caused by or resulting from the exercise and use of the aforesaid easement and right-of-way and associated rights by Grantee and its successors and assigns shall be promptly repaired at the cost of Grantee, or its successors and assigns, as is then in title to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant, and the upon completion of any construction activity by or on behalf of the Grantee or its successors and assigns, such of Grantee, its successors or assigns as is then entitled to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant shall restore the surface of the easement area, and any other lands or premises affected by such construction, as nearly as reasonably practicable to the condition existing prior to such construction. Grantor, its successors and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way and easement at all times and in a manner such as shall not be inconsistent with the intended use of the right-of-way and easement by Grantee, its successors and assigns. Grantee acknowledges that the surface area of the right-of- way and easement being conveyed herein is utilized as a public street of the City. It agrees that it shall, during any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of the storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, keep open to the general circulation of vehicles at all times at least one lane of traffic of sufficient width and of adequate surface for vehicles to proceed above the area of construction in both a easterly and westerly direction in a reasonably convenient manner. Grantee agrees that it shall at all times during its 3 1 construction activities within the right-of-way and easement herein conveyed, at its sole expense, adequately control motor vehicle and pedestrian traffic on and over the traveled portion of Holmes Road. Grantee agrees that its construction of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that there is no resulting undermining of, or insufficient support for, the traveled portion of Holmes Road above such right-of-way and easement. If Grantor, its successor or assign, determines that such undermining or insufficient support for the traveled portion of Holmes Road results from construction by the Grantee within the right-of-way and easement herein conveyed, the Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole expense, make all necessary repairs, replacements, modifications, etc., to achieve such proper support for the traveled road surface. Grantee further agrees that it shall so design and construct storm drainage pipe and associated facilities and shall so reconstruct the traveled portion of Holmes Road that surface water will not accumulate on the replaced traveled portion of Holmes Road but shall be adequately and efficiently drained and carried from the traveled portion of the street. Grantee acknowledges that Holmes Road is a street feet in width and that the paved traveled portion thereof occupies approximately _ feet of such _ foot width. Grantee agrees that should it be necessary for the City in the future to widen the paved portion of said Holmes Road within said foot right-of- way, all improvements erected or constructed by the Grantee in connection with the construction and use of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be relocated to the extent 4 required for the proper functioning of said widened Holmes Road at the City's sole expense. This right-of-way and easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any and all storm drainage pipelines and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors, for themselves and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owner of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans, deeds and records thereof, all in further aid of this description. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. , 2000. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, in said County and State this day of , 2000, personally appeared , as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, 9 required for the proper functioning of said widened Holmes Road at the City's sole expense. This right-of-way and easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any and all storm drainage pipelines and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors, for themselves and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owner of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans, deeds and records thereof, all in further aid of this description. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. , 2000. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By; Aff Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, in said County and State this day of , 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, 5 Notary Public My Commission Expires: Son167.REA CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 5, 2000 Ms. Michelle Russo IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Campus Expansion Dear Ms. Russo: Please let this confirm that the expansion of Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment plant is completed. As a result, the additional sewer capacity of 25,800 gpd, granted in the Planning Commission's approval for the project dated January 26, 1999, is available for your use. cerely, ,W Joe, eith, Director Planning and Zoning JW/mcp HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS April 14, 2000 Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: TDMP Update Dear Mr. Weith: I am pleased to enclose IDX Systems Corporation April 2000 update to the Transportation Demand Management Plan. I can be reached on 864-1758 x 4018. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, (�W A- 4wo Lynne A. Berry Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo, Manager Facilities Administration Enclosure CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION APRIL 2000 UPDATE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN IDX Systems Corporation has taken additional steps to administer the Transportation Demand Management Plan by doing the following: Traffic Survey The traffic survey was prepared by IDX together with Jeanne McCormack of the CCTA. Due to the impact of Y2K planning on IDX personnel, the survey database was not completed until February 2000. The survey was issued to IDX Burlington employees in March 2000 and completed on March 31, 2000. Survey results have been compiled and forwarded to Jeanne McCormack, Marketing Assistant, CCTA, and Ken Kaliski, Area Director, Resource Systems Group, Inc. IDX will work with these groups to look into the feasibility of implementing programs appropriate for our employees. CCTA Posters The CCTA did not have posters regarding their available services, as we previously requested from them. However, based upon our request, Jeanne McCormack, CCTA Marketing Assistant, will have some created. As soon as the posters are available, they will be sent to IDX for posting in the common areas in each of our buildings. Facilities Database As new information is received from the CCTA, the section created in our Facilities Database is updated. Employees were previously sent out a link to the CCTA Website through this database. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE(a FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY (-ALSO ADMITTED M N Y) April 21, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street Po Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty - Holmes Road Extension Dear Bob: My apologies for the delay in my response. Enclosed please find revised documents for the BDP Realty portion of the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way. Generally speaking, I have incorporated the comments you provided on the marked up versions of the offer and replacement warranty deeds. However, on page 1 of Exhibit A, I left the last distance measurement of the description at 26 feet based on information provided by the City engineer. Secondly, I did not add a reference to the Quitclaim Deed from South Burlington to BDP Realty Associates (Vol. 317, Page 210) as that deed specifically excepted the area within the Holmes Road right-of-way. I am working on the Plaza Investments side of the equation and will keep you posted on any new developments. Meanwhile, I am in the process of discussing with City officials the City's conveyance of that portion of the old Green Mountain Drive cul- de-sac that will not be used for road purposes to BDP Realty Associates. I will let you know as soon as I have more information. However, I do not see this as being problematic. Please let me know your comments and questions regarding the enclosed documents. Thank you again for your patience. Sincere-1 Timothy M. Eustace THE/bj1 Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair Son4301.ccr AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of , 2000 by and between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission contains a condition that the Owner shall execute and deliver to the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed public roadways; and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the plat, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the right-of-way described above; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: DRAFT Witness Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: IN PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: Son170.rea DRAFT EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 72" 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 18" 00150" W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 34" W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 33112" E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. Meaning and intending to convey Grantor's interest in the easterly portion of Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES (Witness) By: 2 Its Duly Authorized Agen STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.b.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 18° 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. Meaning and intending to convey the first 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES DRAFT By: (Witness) Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: Son172.rea April 13, 2000 Michele Russo IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: IDX Expansion - Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Ms. Russo: The South Burlington Planning Commission's 2/9/99 approval of the IDX expansion project included a condition requiring the applicant to develop and implement a transportation demand management (TDM) plan (see condition #16(b) in attached Findings of Fact & Decision) and to submit biannual progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. As stated in the condition, the second progress report was to be submitted by 4/1/00. We have not yet received said report. We respectfully request that you submit this document as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I will follow up this letter with a telephone call within the next week. Sincerely, Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning cc: Peter Plumeau, CCMPO CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 1999 Michele Russo IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: IDX Expansion - Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Ms. Russo: The South Burlington Planning Commission's 2/9/99 approval of the IDX expansion project included a condition requiring the applicant to develop and implement a transportation demand management (TDM) plan (see condition #16(b) in attached Findings of Fact & Decision). The condition further requires the applicant to submit biannual progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. As stated in the condition, the first report was to be submitted by 10/1/99. We have not yet received said report. We also have not received an official copy of your proposed TDM plan. We respectfully request that you submit both of these documents as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I will follow up this letter with a telephone call within the next week. ince Joey,Weith, Director Pl�,nning & Zoning cc: Peter Plumeau, CCMPO KESSEUDUFF CORPORATION 1 D! ESiGaN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT April "-0, 2000 Mr. Ray Belai,.r, Zoning ,Administrator City of South, Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1DX Campus Expansion Dear Ray: I spOo with Bob RusMord today regarding the status of the eaGement agreements for IDX Drive. Bob informs me that he has reached ar_ agreement with the City .Attorney on the language for the BDP/IDX portion, of the proposed agreement. Based on the above, we are continuing work on the project. If you would Ue the letter agreement extended to cover this, please contact me. Sincerely, Iradl J C- . e. President cc: Ms. Michelle Russo,1DX Mr. Robert Rushford, Gravel and Shea 30 KIMBA L AVENUE, SUITE 101 • SO, BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05403 (2Q) 862-7500 FAX: (802) 862-1932 • Web8iW vmw.b�MgidUV.Com STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLTNGTOA'. VERNION'T 05402-1507 (802) 660.2555 (VOICE TDD) STEVEN F STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE• E-MAIL(TIRM255500,FIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONMES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY ('ALSO ADMn TM IN N.Y.) March 23, 2000 Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street PO Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 James D. Foley, Esq. Spokes Foley, PLC 239 South Union Street PO Box 986 Burlington, VT 05403-0986 RE: Holmes Road Extension Dear Bob and Jim: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA I enclose a package of draft documents relative to the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way in an effort to address two issues: 1. The City would like to record deeds for the as -built portion of the Holmes Road Extension and retain deeds for the remainder of the road for recording once construction is complete; and 2. Clear up the storm drainage issue (i.e. clarify the respective rights and responsibilities of the parties and provide Plaza Investments with an easement across the entire width of the Holmes Road right-of-way). Enclosed please find draft versions of the following documents: 1. Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Replacement Warranty Deed for BDP Realty Associates; 2. Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Replacement Warranty Deeds for Plaza Investments; Robert H. Rushford, Esq. James D. Foley, Esq. March 23, 2000 Page 2 3. Quitclaim Deed from Plaza Investments to the City of South Burlington; and 4. Storm Drainage Easement from the City of South Burlington to Plaza Investments. After you have a had a chance to review the enclosed documents, please let me know your questions, comments and suggestions. Also, please note that I have left out the metes and bounds description in the Exhibit B Replacement Warranty Deeds. I will send you revised versions with descriptions shortly. Thank you. Sincerel , Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosures cc: Ray Belair son4279.cor DR, AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of , 2000 by and between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the plat, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the right-of-way described above; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deed") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: By: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: Son170.rea � f R, A F T EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont corporation having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 72" 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N. 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: (Witness) Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of , 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Scn172.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont corporation having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. [insert metes and bounds description here] Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of , 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be 2 his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.b.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of , 2000 by and between Plaza Investments, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Blodgett Property Development, Commercial Portion", prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City, a portion of its lands and premises depicted on the above -referenced plat and lying within the right-of-way depicted on said plat as "Homes Road Extension" for a portion of a city street; WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated November 9, 1988 and recorded in Volume 275, Page 103 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands and premises for a portion of the Holmes Road right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the plat, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, forever and clear of all encumbrances, the right-of-way described above; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City a replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in the Amended Offer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the November 9, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: By: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. PLAZA INVESTMENTS Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of PLAZA INVESTMENTS and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of PLAZA INVESTMENTS. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Before me, Notary Public My commission expires: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared , as duly authorized agent for the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, Notary Public My commission expires: Son169.REA AF_T EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont corporation having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located on the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and shown as "Holmes Road Extension" on a plan entitled "Composite Survey for Blodgett Property Development," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated September, 1988, last revised November 8, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 101 of the South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road at the southwest corner of the parcel to be conveyed, thence proceeding S 710 26131" E a distance of 0.45 feet, more or less to a point; thence proceeding S 710 24120" E 472.41 feet, more or less to a point; thence proceeding N 180 57140" E a distance of 32.42 feet to a point; thence proceeding N 680 32128" W a distance of 473.29 feet to a point in the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 180 57140" W a distance of 56.08 feet to the point of beginning. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Warranty Deed of dated and recorded in Volume Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PLAZA INVESTMENTS, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. PLAZA INVESTMENTS By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County, this day of 11 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of PLAZA INVESTMENTS, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of PLAZA INVESTMENTS. Son:7l.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 EXHIBIT B DRAFT REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont corporation having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located on the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and shown as "Holmes Road Extension" on a plan entitled "Composite Survey for Blodgett Property Development," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., dated September, 1988, last revised November 8, 1988 and recorded in Volume 252, Page 101 of the South Burlington Land Records. [insert metes and bounds description here] Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Warranty Deed of , dated and recorded in Volume Page of the South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PLAZA INVESTMENTS, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of . 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: PLAZA INVESTMENTS By: (Witness) Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CRITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared Duly Authorized Agent of PLAZA INVESTMENTS, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of PLAZA INVESTMENTS. Scn171.b.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 E), ',- QUITCLAIM DEED R FT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont limited partnership with its principal place of business in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont ("Grantor"), and DENNIS L. BLODGETT of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does hereby RELEASE, REMISE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM unto the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont ("Grantee") and its successors and assigns, all its right, title and interest in and to a portion of a twenty foot (201) easement previously conveyed to it by BDP Realty, Inc. and located within the City's right-of-way, known as the Holmes Road Extension. The location of said easement is more specifically described as follows: Being a strip of land twenty feet (201) in uniform width centered on the existing storm drainage line within the Holmes Road right-of-way. Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to the within Grantor by Easement Deed of BDP Realty Associates, dated February 16, 1989 and recorded in Volume 275, Page 583 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The purpose of this Quitclaim Deed and a contemporaneous Easement Deed from the City of South Burlington to Plaza Investments is to establish a storm drainage easement across the entire width of the Holmes Road right-of-way in favor of Plaza Investments, its successors and assigns, and to establish the respective rights and responsibilities in and to said storm drainage pipeline among the parties. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that from and after the ensealing of these presents, it will have and claim no rights, title, or interest in or to the above -described property. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of 2000 IN THE PRESENCE OF: PLAZA INVESTMENTS By: Its Duly Authorized Agen STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, in said County, this day of 2000, , personally appeared as duly authorized agent of PLAZA INVESTMENTS and he/she acknowledged this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed, and the free act and deed of the PLAZA INVESTMENTS. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: IN THE PRESENCE OF: Dennis L. Blodge STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, in said County, this day of , 2000, Dennis L. Blodgett personally appeared and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Son:66.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: V, DRAFT STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipal corporation located in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (Grantors), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents do hereby GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto PLAZA INVESTMENTS, a Vermont limited partnership situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual non-exclusive right and easement, twenty feet (201) in uniform width, for the purposes of laying, installing, constructing, reconstructing, operating, repairing, maintaining, removing, restoring and/or replacing an underground storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of Grantors' property situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more specifically described as follows: Being a strip of land twenty feet (201) in uniform width across the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way, centered on the existing storm drainage line. Said storm drainage line is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Grantor by Warranty Deeds of (1) BDP Realty Associates, dated and recorded in Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and (2) Plaza Investments dated , and recorded in Volume , Page of said Land Records. 01 The purpose of this storm drainage easement and a contemporaneous Quitclaim Deed from Plaza Investments to the City of south Burlington is to establish a storm drainage easement across the entire width of the Holmes Road right-of-way in favor of Plaza Investments, its successors and assigns, and to establish the rights and responsibilities in and to said storm drainage pipeline among the parties. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall be authorized to install, construct, operate, use, maintain, repair and replace a storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, under the traveled portion of the Holmes Road Extension right-of- way; provided, however, that any repair, by said Grantee or its successors and assigns shall be initiated and undertaken only with the advance written consent of Grantor, its successors or assigns, and provided further that such entry shall be reasonably necessary to the purpose hereof and shall be performed in such a manner as to cause as little disruption of traffic as is feasible under the circumstances. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have no right to make use of the surface of Grantor's property lying above said premises except as set forth in the preceding sentence and in common with the general public. Grantee expressly covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Grantor and its successors and assigns, from all costs, liability, damage or expense, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, caused by or resulting from the actions or inactions of the agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors of Grantee and its successors and assigns on or 04, about the property of Grantor; and further agrees that any damage to the property to Grantor caused by or resulting from the exercise and use of the aforesaid easement and right-of-way and associated rights by Grantee and its successors and assigns shall be promptly repaired at the cost of Grantee, or its successors and assigns, as is then in title to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant, and the upon completion of any construction activity by or on behalf of the Grantee or its successors and assigns, such of Grantee, its successors or assigns as is then entitled to the lands to which this easement and right-of-way are appurtenant shall restore the surface of the easement area, and any other lands or premises affected by such construction, as nearly as reasonably practicable to the condition existing prior to such construction. Grantor, its successors and assigns shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way and easement at all times and in a manner such as shall not be inconsistent with the intended use of the right-of-way and easement by Grantee, its successors and assigns. Grantee acknowledges that the surface area of the right-of- way and easement being conveyed herein is utilized as a public street of the City. It agrees that it shall, during any construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of the storm drainage pipe, together with all appurtenances thereto, keep open to the general circulation of vehicles at all times at least one lane of traffic of sufficient width and of adequate surface for vehicles to proceed above the area of construction in both a easterly and westerly direction in a reasonably convenient manner. Grantee agrees that it shall at all times during its 3 i construction activities within the right-of-way and easement herein conveyed, at its sole expense, adequately control motor vehicle and pedestrian traffic on and over the traveled portion of Holmes Road. Grantee agrees that its construction of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that there is no resulting undermining of, or insufficient support for, the traveled portion of Holmes Road above such right-of-way and easement. If Grantor, its successor or assign, determines that such undermining or insufficient support for the traveled portion of Holmes Road results from construction by the Grantee within the right-of-way and easement herein conveyed, the Grantee agrees that it shall, at its sole expense, make all necessary repairs, replacements, modifications, etc., to achieve such proper support for the traveled road surface. Grantee further agrees that it shall so design and construct storm drainage pipe and associated facilities and shall so reconstruct the traveled portion of Holmes Road that surface water will not accumulate on the replaced traveled portion of Holmes Road but shall be adequately and efficiently drained and carried from the traveled portion of the street. Grantee acknowledges that Holmes Road is a street feet in width and that the paved traveled portion thereof occupies approximately _ feet of such _ foot width. Grantee agrees that should it be necessary for the City in the future to widen the paved portion of said Holmes Road within said _ foot right-of- way, all improvements erected or constructed by the Grantee in connection with the construction and use of the storm drainage pipe and associated facilities shall be relocated to the extent 4 required for the proper functioning of said widened Holmes Road at its sole expense. This right-of-way and easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any and all storm drainage pipelines and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the Grantors, for themselves and their successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents they are the sole owner of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in the manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and they hereby engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans, deeds and records thereof, all in further aid of this description. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Witness) STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. 2000. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, in said County and State this day of , 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, 0 Notary Public My Commission Expires: Son 167.REA kNr-17-00 INIpm Frm- RAVEL fHEA 8028581450 T-621 A.02132 P-445 '4 GRAVEL -AND Stir.A Attorneys ax Ltw sr.pben A Crew�rra 5rewirt 1'i r..Ccn.«;4y CI. rFe n CR..i., T SA..v� 76 SL. Pawl Script W.q•-4 G {?a+F. Ar. Eweet Cirf:c. Bat 369 Cra.j W.wiM.f� �..,.. L �cn.vp rY.iL..•, 8wlrliag[on. VarrtlOaC 454U2•Q359 lulu t pr:ecrso Desna B N.e.a. SA-1 srr...r C....�i Lvap peik coo 2"ric0aas 802.6$8.0220 P.wvr a En Reb.rr P O•H..il ir�a• w: f. sti.,r _ ,s 54,ebsil. N F-6., File—rarle 802.6:8 1456 Msmp.m.r� brspl.aP \S.esr.n lepe.es C ii rr:�s www; g rr, tDAl1C r.0 O1G1 kr4.rt H R6 hErrg AnQrgw jS :Nwn..,►a• °Ade.N_d -: S+ March 17, 2000 MIA FAX Tunothy M. Eustacce, Esq. St wl, Page & Fletcher, P.C. P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 1 T Re: BDP Rea& &.WCialga( DX EM sion y Dear Tim: As a follow-up to our meeting 101 week, please let me know if you have had any, discussions with Jim Foley and/or whether the proposed dedication/subordination doc==Ts have been drafted. VAlso, phase let me know if there is anything we c= do to help move the process along. Very truly yours, GRAVEL, AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHP-ejh cc: Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (via fax) Mr. Brad Carter (via fax) - KESSELIDUFF CORPORATION To: Mr, Ray Belair, City of South Burlington, Zoning Administrator From; Brad Carter CC: Ms. Carole Gartzke, IDX Systems Corporation Dot& 3/20/2000 Rs: OX drive dedicatiorlsubordina6017 agreement Enclosed is a letter from Gravel and Shea to the City Attorney regareing the above reieren,ned agreement. To date we have not received the draft agreement discussed at our 3/10,'00 meeting. Anythir,g you can do to expec;ite tt,,is process would be appreciated, it we can be of any assistance, please contact is, 30 Kimball Ave. South Burlington, 7 C5403 pri (602)-662-7600 fax (8C2)-862.1932 GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www.gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: trushford@grayshea.com FAX AND MAIL Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: March 10, 2000 Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post, Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Robert H. Rushford Clarke A. Gravel Charles T Shea Of Couseel Norman William. Special Counee[ Leigh Polk Cole Johan WE. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Andrew D. Manitsky• sAd.itt,d only is New Y—h Thank you for meeting with me and Brad Carter this morning. This letter will confirm our agreement that the Building Permit for the IDX (Phase I) Expansion will be issued today with the understanding that: 1. The City has requested the execution and delivery of a maintenance and/or subordination agreement (the "Agreement") by BDP and Plaza Associates for the storm drain line that runs under Holmes Road Extension; and 2. That if the Agreement has not been executed and delivered to the City within thirty (30) days from the date of this letter, unless such date is otherwise extended by agreement of the parties, BDP will stop construction under its Building Permit until the Agreement has been executed and delivered to the City. GRAVEL AND SHEA Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA e� Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh cc: Mr. Brad Carter (via fax) Timothy Eustace, Esq. (via fax) Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (via fax) March 10, 2000 Page 2 To: flay Beiair, City of South Burlington Froms Brad Carter CC: Carole Gartzke, IDX Systems Corncraton Date: 01 !31100 Re: lDX Campus Expansion Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Bob Rushford, BDP realty's attorney, regarding the sewer easement requl'ed for IDX Drive, formerly, Hortioultural Road, As you suggested, I asked Bob Rushford to work this out &ectty with the City Attorney to expedite t-ie orocess. I am hcpeful that the easement documents will be completed within the next few days. 30 Krr*i Ave, South Uurlington, VT 0540,3 ph (832}$62-7600 fax (802)-8a2-1932 G°R,AVFT L AND SHEA Atto rn oy.8 at Law t..�l... R, Cra-pf.n L.4h Fvlk Col. Sfewuf H. MCCeeaoehy 0..'n.,r H. Ru AFaed Rob.ae ➢. H.nley Job— W. S. MaidAtd William G. ,port Jr. Mie►till 71 F.rka. 76 $t. Paul Street Craif W...L..Jy Rebecca C, Raskin Foot OfIce Box 869 J.... F• KfttPa RuJohn R. Pa...eCo Clark. �, Or...l O,r Ce.e�e1 riingtorA, Vormooe Ob40�.0364 D...1. R. Fear.nn Gharl.a T. she. Peter S. f;rly ➢ob.rt F. O'N.111 Norman Will{a0u sp"i.l L'arr�ef �tiepbagr 802.668,0990 M.e .r.r L Heefro<e.ry Faoekdc 802,658,1456 MX.,ft P. M fow www.6ravelsheq.corn H.-.her arise. Writer's Z.Nuir January 2 R' 2000 niushford{�gra�clshaa,cam Timothy M. Eustace, .Esq. Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P,C. P.O. Box ISO7 Burlington, VT 05402-1507 Re: BDP Rcalty -Amociates/IDX Expansion Dear Tim: 0 Pursuant to our telephone conversation, I have reviewed the titlefor BDP's property to determine whether the sewer line,vhich runs along the former "Horticultural Road" has beer conveyed to the City. Based upon my initial research, it appears that an easement has not been conveyed to the City. 1~or your reference, I enclose a copy of the unrecorded .ALTA Survey for the property whic'a depicts the sewer line and references an easement deed recorded in Volume 89 at Page 123 or the City of South Burlington Land Records. I have enclosed a copy of the referenced easement deed which is from National Life Insurance Company to the University of Vermont and Agricultural College (Le... conveying an easement 20 feet in width., to widen the University's existing 50' wide roadway, together with the right to maintain underground water, sewer and utility lines to be located within the north 10' of the 20' foot hide casement). I have also enclosed a copy of the subsequent Quitclaim Deed from the University to National Life Insurance Company dated November 28, 1977 and recorded in. Volume 120 at Page 500 of the City of South Burlington Land Records (i.e., fox the purpose of conveying the 70' wide Horticultural Road back to National Life Insurance Company, iaxcluding all utility easements located below or above Horticultural Road). In light of the foregoing, it appears that the existing deeds of record do not include a conveyance of the sewer line to the City. Therefore, a dedication from BDP may be needed_ 0 P Y GRAVEL AND SHZA Tz xzothy M. Eustace, Esq, January 28, 2000 Page 2 Once you have had an opportunity to review these materials, please ca!l me to discuss the appropriate scope of The easemeztt (i.e., widk11, length and purpose) so wr can prepare the necessary dedication documents. Very traly yours; (J- RAVEL .AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford Rid�t.�ejh Enclosures cc., Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (w/o enclos�'es) Mr. Brad Carter (w/o enclosures) Z 1/ao171, iZi fj dt National Life Insurance Company, a Vermont corporation, having its office and principal place of business at and of Montpelier in the County of Washington and State of Vermont Grantor , in the consideration o/ One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration B Udill paid to its full satisfaction by the City of South Burlington, a municipal corporation Of South Burlington in the County of Chitcenden and State of Vermont Oruntee , by these presents, does freely 0We, Ordllt, well, Conbey anb Confirm unto the said Grantee th,� City of South Burlington, a municipal corporation and its successors and assi6ns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the C'ounly of Chitcenden and State of 1'eruiunt, described as fullurrY, viz: Being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to the Grantor herein by Warranty Deed of Dominion Realty Corporation dated December 29, 1952, recorded in Vol. 3U, Page 497 of the land Records of South Burlington, Vermont. The parcels being conveyed are located on the Easterly side of U.S. Route 7, known as Shelburne Road, and is further described as: The first parcel being conveyed is a roadway heretofore designated as Creen Mountain Drive, to be used by the public f-ir vehicular traffic. Such roadway is now shown on that survey prepared for National Life Insurance Company by Webster- Martln, Inc, and recorded in the Land R�:cords of South Burlington in Vol. 105, at Page 21. To de�.ribc such roadway, rcfer�!nce will be made to Tract numbers, and other surveyor notations shown on said survey. The roadway convcyuJ commences at the t.astc rn boundary line of Shelburne RaaJ and pro:ueds in an E&srerly direction to the Western line of Tract 16, and is bounded oil Lhe North by Tracts 3, 5, and 13, and bounded on the South by Tracts 4, 6, and 17; such roadway then turns to the North and proceeds approximately parallel to Shelburne Road to the `lorcher:, boundary of Tract 1, and is bound un the West by Tracts 13, 12, 11 and 1, and is bound on the East by Tracts 16, 15, 14, 10, 9, B, and lands owned by the University of Vermont, such roadway also includes that portion of I:urticultural Roams, so called, bounded on the West by a line run- ning from the NOrLheast corner of Tract 12 to the Southeast corner of Tract 11, and bounded or. the Fast by a line run-ing from the Northwest corner of Tract 10 to the Southwest corner of Tract 9. Conveyed with the foregoing 1s an easement for roadway purposes, such easement being shown on said survey_g*___i�cular area having an 80 foot radius and affecting portions of Tracts 1 and 8 The second parcel being conveyed is a roadway for vehicular traffic. The mentioned survey identifies the area of this second parcel as an "easement", how— ever, this conveyance is conveying to the Grantee herein the fee to the entire area for roadway purposes. Such survey shows the roadway as abutting the Eastern boundary line of Shelburne Road, such roadway commences at the Northwest corner of the tract identified on said survey as "Nordic Ford", and extends North to the Northern boundary of Tract 1. The roadway is shown to have a 40 foot width along the Western portion of Tracts 1 and 2, and that portion of the roadway lying South of Tract 2 is shown on said survey to have an irregular shape, such roadway also includes approximately the West 110 feet of HorSicultural Road, so called. Such roadway is for public use. I The conveyances made herein are subject to easements for public utilities. Reference is hereby made to the above mentioned survey and deed and their records, and to all former deeds and records referred to therein. �ro babe anb to bolt said granted premises, with all the privileges and ap- purtenances thereof, to the said Grantee the City of South Burlington its successors and assignsto their own use and behooj /orevert .4nd the said Grantor National Life Insurance Company far itself and 7bc4val �t®do es covenant udth the said Grantee the City of South Burlington its sucrressorg an assi s inst�crs�m,m�zr lint instil the ensealine of these presents it is the sole owner o/ the premises, and hh� as good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are Tree from eber_q encumbrance; except such encumbrances mentioned above. Do e aad it does hereby eneaee to Marrant anb 30ef enb the same asainat all lawful claims whatever, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, National Life Insurance Company has caused this deed to be signed and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed by its Vice President and duly authorized agent I�it.'L'#��uf , `�te�bYzs�Lif'tii�i1< �S'>�•�c. ��','�+ this 6th day o/ January .4. D. 1976. �111 pCt'St'llCt' of NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COKPANY —7--B J /-, ) a Vice President and Duly Authorized Agent Norma V. Kellogg Rny B. Glazier , Sheldon Bowers Vermont PrOFer;y Tran:far Tar _ r Data e of Vermont, gg .i'c this Countp day of .4. D. 19 personally appeared, and sealed and subscribed, to be STATE OF VEMONT Before rne WASHINGTON COUNTY, ss. led this instrument, by et and deed. (Title) On this6th day of January , 1976, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County personally appeared Roy B. Glazier known to me to be the per- son who, as Vice President and duly authorized agent of National Life Insurance Company, a Vermont corporation, and the corporation which executed the foregoing instrument, signed the same, and upon oath acknowledged to me that he did so sign said instrument in the name and upon behalf of said corporation as such officer, that the sane is his free act and deed as such officer, and the free and corporate act and deed of said corporation; that he was duly authorized by its Board of Directors; and that the seal affixed to said instFumA i Yy the corporate seal of said corporation. IN TESTIHO.." WHEREOF, I hove hereunto su�icroA �y•blme, and affixed my off! cial seal at Montpelier. Vermont. MY commission expires February 10. 1979. , a '•!r, ' �, • '---- Notary Public Sheldon Bowers Ir mmyrosirr ar rrArowr FQ 111,.--- LANC • COwcwf OR STOW • JuwKr r�w,nJ Vol. 261 Page�125 \ 1 zeb �1 Z19 AGREEMENT by and between BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Municipality's Planning Commission has approved a final subdivision plat entitled "Boundary and Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986 and prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission contains a condition that Owner convey to Municipality the lands depicted on the above referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to City of South Burlington, Area - 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, the above described lands and/or interest therein are to be dedicated to Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances, pursuant to said final approval and final plat; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the Municipality appropriate deeds of conveyance for the above described lands and/or interest therein; and WHEREAS, Municipality has agreed to convey to Owner the lands depicted on the above referenced plat as "City of South Vol. 261 Page 126 — Burlington to BDP Realty Associates, Area - 0.481 acres". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the final approval of the Municipality's Planning Commission, conveyance of certain lands from Municipality to Owner as set forth above, and for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the Municipality a deed of conveyance, an unexecuted copy of which is attached as Exhibit A, said delivery constituting a formal offer of dedication to the Municipality to be held by the Municipality until the acceptance or rejection of such offer of dedication by the legislative body of the Municipality. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal offer of dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the Municipality at any time. 3. This irrevocable offer of dedication shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all assigns, grantees, successors and/or heirs of the Owner. Dated this G day of April, 1988. IN E PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Its Duly Authorized Agent CITY -OF SOUT,,�RLINGTON By: '0- fv Its Duly t zed Agent Vol. 261 PZ�12 I .ram At South Burlington, in said County, this ✓lJ day of April, 1988, personally appeared C//fG/Lit!�C. and he acknowledged the within instrument, by him signed, to be his free act and deed, and the free act and deed of BDP Realty Associates. 1 Before me .71G/�!(.li`�L.� ��• • ��/1CL L. totary Public STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At South Burlington, in said Cou ty, th' -?4 day of April, 1988, personally appeared l� duly authorized agent of the City of South Burlington, Vermont, and he acknowledged the within instrument, by -him signed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of the Municipality. Before me Notary Public. / cbg Dedication Vol . 261 D Page128 — �- KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, GRANTOR, in consideration of Ten And More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation located in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, GRANTEE, by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the said Grantcc, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden in the State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located on t�wcsterly side o U.S. Route 7, which parcel is shown on "Bounda ey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Ro u urlington, Vermont," dated August, 1986, last revised February 13, 1987, by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., Winooski, Vermont, recorded at Volume Pages _ of the Land Records of the City of South I Burlington. This parcel is depicted on the above -referenced survey as follows: Commencing at a point, which point is located S72021'26"E a distance of 39.52 feet from the concrete monument which marks the northwestern corner of the lands conveyed to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company dated January 6, 1976 and recorded at Volume 126, Pages 289-291 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington; thence proceedin$ S72021'26"E for a distance of 819.64 feet, more or less, to a point marked by a stake found; thence deflecting to the right and proceeding SISo00'50"W for a distance of 67.00 feet, more or less, to a point; thence deflecting to the right and proceeding N69029'34"W for it distance of 820.41 feet, more or less, to a point; thence deflecting to the right and proceeding N18002'47"E for a distance of 26.00 feet, more or less, to the point or place of beginning, containing approximately 0.875 acres. These lands arc more particularly described as being s all the land convevcd to BDP Realty Associates by Quit -Claim of H tcn Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded at Volume 141, Pages_233-235 of the CLand —Records of the City of South Burlington which are located northerly —of the _following described line: Commencing -at d point, which—Pcimt is located S69029'34"E—a distance of 40.04 feet, more or less, from the int located S18002'47W a distance of 24.00 feet, more or less, rom the northwest corner of the lands conveyed to the City of South Burlington by Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company, dated January &, 1976 and recorded at Volume 126, Pages 289-291 of said Land Records; thence proceeding S69029'34"E for a distance of 820.41 feet, more or less, to a point located S18000'50"W a distance of 67.00 feet from the northeastern corner of the lands conveyed herein. Reference is hereby made to the above referenced documents and the references therein in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns, to their own use and bchoof forever; and the said Grantor BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, for itself and its successors and assib-ns, does covenant. with the said Grantee the CITY OF SOUTH BURLpNGTON, and its successors and assigns, that until the enscaling of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that it is FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; except as aforesaid; and does herchy engage to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims tonAHoeson,r.0 '' Whatever, except as set forth herein. 1rPA-,- S .T tAr P 0 Bm 906 •1 w Q'.TII77UI•'f P.�a •. 96 Un SrIU7 I' u�. `T OSiO: ;I Received for record April 26, 1988 at 111:00 a.m. A t t e s� ity Clerk Reproduced by Reprographic-i of New England. Inca., S. Burlington. VP, by the fixed line photographic proccar. GRAVEL AND SHEA Attorneys at Law 76 St. Paul Street Post Office Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0369 Telephone 802.658.0220 Facsimile 802.658.1456 www.gravelshea.com Writer's E-Mail: rrushford@grayshea.com Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: December 13, 1999 Stephen R. Crampton Stewart H. McConaughy Robert B. Hemley William G. Post Jr. Craig Weatherly James E. Knapp John R. Ponsetto Dennis R. Pearson Peter S. Erly Robert F. O'Neill Margaret L. Montgomery Stephen P. Magowan Heather Briggs Leigh Polk Cole Robert H. Rushford Johan W.E. Maitland Michelle N. Farkas Rebecca C. Raskin Clarke A. Gravel Of Counsel Charles T. Shea Norman Williams Special Counee( We represent BDP Realty Associates and were recently asked to provide the City with the necessary dedication documents required to satisfy Condition No. 2 of the February 9, 1999 Findings of Fact and Decision by the Planning Commission, a copy of which is enclosed. It is my understanding that the City is looking for dedication documents for the full length of Green Mountain Drive (i.e., to the northeast corner of BDP's property) and the full length of IDX Drive (i.e., from Shelburne Road to Green Mountain Drive). Based upon our review of the Land Records, it appears that these parcels were previously conveyed to the City by the following conveyances: 1. Warranty Deed from National Life Insurance Company to the City of South Burlington dated January 6, 1976 and recorded in Volume 126 at Page 289 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, a copy of which is enclosed. The description in this Deed includes the full length of Green Mountain Drive as shown on the referenced plan (a copy of which is also enclosed). We note that this Deed included an easement in favor of the City for use as a cul-de- sac (i.e., presumably during the period that the roadway was not used as a through street). Now that Green Mountain Drive will be completed as a through street, we would like to know whether this is an appropriate time for the City to release its cul-de-sac easement. 2. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261 at Page 125 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, a copy of which is also enclosed. The description in this GRAVEL AND SHEA Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator December 13, 1999 Page 2 Deed is for the full length of IDX Drive (f/k/a Holmes Road), and is depicted on the referenced plan, a copy of which is enclosed. Please let me know if there are any other dedications which are required to satisfy Condition No. 2 of the Planning Commission's approval. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford RHR:ejh Enclosures cc: Mr. Ronald L. Roberts (w/enclosures) Mr. Brad Carter (w/enclosures) Joseph S. McLean, Esq. (w/enclosures) War-10-00 02:15pn From -GRAVEL AHD SHEA 8026581456 T-468 P.32/03 F-123 I GR-A,VE>L. AND SHEA Azzorneys ar Law 76 Sr. Paul Street Poet Office HOX 369 B6101apon. Vcr-OrLs 0540,2.0569 TF(F�bPAF 802 b580220 F'Fc.ns lc SD2.658 1456 www. s�nvedshea.corn wr.tti a �.n�E smahfwdUVMvshL1 Casa u�� Mr. Ray Belair. Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP alty Associates Dear PAY: March 10. 2000 st.phca R C—P.on t' . —r H M.coa..ebr P-b." k H.a.�•.r 3.me. E !tn•pp J..Me R. PFn..cto Dena'. K P..r—a F..cr S Erly Koh.rt .. Q N.di M rggarF. L. Mooreeru.rr, 9[ephFa P Mad•-• H...bee Brag. Cl.ri, A Cr—A CO.r,.. T Sh.. 01 Cw....l Norw.n W,ll:.ra. y..aa Poll C,.l. M �b.tle N F•ri.. K.b.cca C A-- A.1R.. D M.n-..►1 r •Morne..eJ ...1y .s hr. r"K Thank you for meeting with rue and Brad Caner this morning. This letter will confirm our ap-eement that the Building Permit for the IDX (Phase 1) Exp-ansion will be issued today with the understanding that: I. The City has requested the execution and delivery of a maintenance and/or subordination agreement (the "Agreement'') by BDP and Plaza Associates for the storm drain line that runs under Holmes Road Extension; and 2_ That if the Agreement has not been executed and delivered to the City Aithin thirty (30) days from the date of this letter, unless such date is otherwise extended by agreement of the parties, BDP will stop construction under its Building Permit until the Agreement has been executed and delivered to the City. War-10-00 02:Iloin From -GRAVE, ANC SHEA SOZ5581455 T-458 P.03/ 3 F—IN GRAM-L AND SHEA WS Ray Belair, Zoning Adminiswator Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, GR.AV AND SHEA Robert H. Rushford ;RHR:ejh cc: ?sir, Brad Carter (via fax) Timothy EUMCC, Esq. (via fax) -%Ir. Ronald L. Robers (via fax) March i 0, 2000 Page 2 Mar-10-00 02:14pm From -GRAVE'. AN' SHEA 8026581456 T-463 P.01103 P-123 1 ptiCsN _ (902) 658-0220 CARAVEL AND SHEA AITORNE:YS AT LAW 76 ST. PAUL S'f UET pt)s r OFFIc'F Box 369 SUPLLN, GTON, VT 05402.0369 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL FAV (802) 658-1456 To; Mr. RAy Belair, 7,oaing AdmiMstrawr Date: Marcb 10, 2000 846-4101 From: Rabert 11, Rushford Operator Eileen Number of Pages (including this c®veT): 3 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This transmission contains privileged and confidential information intendeo only for the addressee narnui above. Any use, dissemination or distribution oy any person or entity other than the addressee is strictly prohibitecl If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at the number listed above and return the odgmal transmission to us at the above address. October 20, 1999 Mr. Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: IDX campus expansion Dear Ray: As a follow up to our conversation of last week, I have reviewed the scope of the first phase of construction and compared it to the total project for the purpose of establishing the phase 1 impact fees. The square footage of the project is 260,184 square feet. Phase 1 consists of 116,000 square feet and represents 45% of the total project. The sewer impact fee for the total project is $ 110,000.00, and the traffic impact fee is $ 64,500.00 Based on the above, I request the phase 1 sewer and traffic impact fees be established at $ 49,500.00 and $ 29025.00 respectively. Prior to having IDX issue these checks, I will contact you and verify your approval of this proposal. Thank You. Sincerely, Brad J. Carter President cc: Ms. Michelle Russo, IDX Systems Corporation State of Vermont — Fire Prevention Division CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION .Vain Offices - National Life Budding - Drawer :0..Wonrpefer, PT 05620-3101 Phone (802 828-2106 or FAY (802) 828-2195 Reeronal O}Ttces O Barre - -1 Washington Street, 05641 O Rutland - 430 ASA Bloorner Bldg., Merchants Row. 05-01 Phone (802) 4"9-1934 or FAX i802 4-9-4446 Phone (802)-86-586-or F.-LY (802)-86-58-2 O Williston - 19 ('ommerce Street, 05495 Q Springfield - P. U. Box 280. 05156. 380 River Street., No. Springfield Phone 1801 638-2199 or FAIL f802) 863--410 Phone (802) 886.2-12 or F.LY 1802) 886-1-19 Fill Out All Requested Information, On BOTH Pages, To Facilitate Review Building Site Information Name atBoddmg IDX Systems Building- Physical Location 1400 Shelburne Road S. Burlington Vermont ZipCode 05403 Building Owner Information - or leasor, if applicable Name ojBudding IDX Systems Corporation Address 1400 Shelburne Road Phone 802-862-1022 Attn: Michelle Russo S. Burlington, Vermont ZipCode 05403 Historic Building Information This building is 7 Listed on the National Register of Historic Places O Listed on the State Register of Historic Places: t> Is historically significant. as determined by the Vermont advisory Council On Historic Preservation: M4Not known, or not applicable. If listed or determined to be historically significant. provide complete documentation showing the listing, or historic signiftcants. Occupanev and Construction Information ( Continued on Back Paee) BOCA OCCUPANCY CODE Business/AssemblplFPA 901 CODE New Business/New Ass . {Voa the building involved in this project constructed prior to 1983' ] YES -1 .%O Describe Current orrropo.sed' e Current use office hssi1ding Expansion of office plus cafeteria & training spaces. DcscribeConstntction Office building - steel £ramp/ onp drank - et -pat eil—ri exterior walls with eifs - link -similar construction except curtain wall on west elev. !RCL ROC4 r'onsirucnon Trpe Moo Soncombusuble �Conetete - Stye! VCOcombUSable'Combustible %luonrv-Woom Combustible i«'aod Frame; IA IB 2a _B C -'A 3B 1 T, :B PLANS REVIEW RECORD - For Office Use Only - Do Not Write Below This Line Site • Boland .'Ions'ke"e" Dare 71ans Bs -Due Plans 9s `acs '.tide, -s 1 Ra ,,'Id . «u,acd Occupancy and Construction information (Continued From Front Page) Fire Protection 2FFire,{farm O Manual -j Automanc Xj Smoke Detectors NFPA 13 Systems JCSprinkler t Complete ] Limited ] Bone Standpipes: X3 Yes 0 ,Vo ] Other: (4wcih) Residential Occupancy - Number of Units Number of Units Having Handicapped Access Public Water Supph 7Yes ] No GPM Exist'g?SI Public Sewer. As Fels ] No This Phase In (Mice Structural Design Loads: Roof 400LL.Lt./20D.L Floors 80L.L•./50 D.L. 100L.L./50 D.L. Square Footage of Largest Story: W; I�lon Total Square Footage 113 , 644 Number of Stories 2+basement Number of Occupants 689 Describe Heating System Heat pump system Project Contractor Name: Kessei/Duff Corporation Phone 802-862-7600 Address 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 101, S. Burlington, VT 05403 Project Engineer or Architect Name: Freeman French Freeman, Inc .Phone 802. 864-6844 Address 81 Maple Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 Project Valuation and Construction Permit Fee The�Constri ed Perndt Fee is based of the total valuation of all construction work to be performed W111 iam Gardner , certify that the total value of all construction work is S 6,551,164 (Appliemes Signature) TOTAL V.4LUAT10,'v OF CO:vSTRUCTIO:v IYORA S 6 , 551,164 N o.00450 s S 29 , 480. 24 THIS IS THE CONSTRUCTION PERVIT FEE. [VOTE - FOR BUILDINGS CONSTRf'CTED PRIOR TO 1983. AND UNDERGOING RENOVATIONS ONLY, THE FEE IS BASED ON THE TOTAL 14LC.CMON OF CONSTRUCTION WORK .Y 0.003-? - S Does the valuation of construction include fire alarm and or sprinkler system costs' ] YES ONO NOTE - For projects involving volunteer labor and donated materials, the valuation of construction work is based on the value of the volunteer labor, as well as the donated materials, when calculating fee. For projects involving only a change of use, with no renovations, there is a minimum fee of S25.00. Emergency Conservation Certifications FOR NEW PUBLICLY FUNDED BUILDINGS. I _.__ .terrify that this new publicly funded budding has been approved through the A& 250 process. v I aertifv that this new building or addition. funded by state monies. meets or exceeds the standard t licensed angmeer or —hncon for energy conservation entitled "Stare of Vermont. 1991. Dept. of State Buildings Energy Conservation Standard For New and Existing Buildings". nj I certify that this new building, funded by federal or municipal monies, meets or exceeds the (licensed engineer or archit=n standard for exterior envelop design contained in 'Energy Conscnation in New Building Design" IASHREA 90-80. the 1980 edition). Other Information - This section must be completed - Has the proposed project already started? ] YES S3 NO If NO, what is the anticipated starting date Nov. 15 , 1999 _...ompietion date Jan . 1 , 2 00 1 Name ol'Applicantlplcaseprint) William L. Gardner Signature of .applicant Suspension ojPermit• Any permit issued shall become insuad ifthe authorized ssork u mr commenced within sir months after issuance of the permit, or if the authorized rvrk it suspended or abandoned Jor a period of six months after the time of commencing the work o. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPHCOM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) March 2, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL James D. Foley, Esq. Spokes Foley, PLC 239 South Union Street PO Box 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 RE: Holmes Road Extension Dear Jim: As discussed, I am enclosing the following documents for your review: 1. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Warranty Deed from Dennis L. Blodgett and Gerald C. Milot to the City of South Burlington; 2. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Warranty Deed from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington; and 3. Storm Drainage Easement Deed from BDP Realty Associates to Dennis L. Blodgett and Plaza Investments. After you have had a chance to review the enclosed documents, please give me a call to discuss. Thank you. Sincere1 , Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair (w/o encl.) Robert Rushford, Esq. (w/o encl.) Son4262.cor 03%02%2000 THU 14:56 FAX S020609119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER STITZEL, PACE & FLETCHER, P.C. A77C)R.NEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 15U7 BUR4fNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 $ � F 4TfCZEL (802) 660-25S5 (VOICE(('DD) PA7M R. PAGF' F'Ax (802) dbo•ZS52 or titi0 yl 19 RrBERTF_FLE CHFR -NIAIL (FU tl,4:5 55 iF i R msPF. CD M ) WPJTER'SB114AR,(rEUcT,10E@PIRMSPF.C(W JOSEPH S. MCLEAN WRITER'S FAX (802) 6611-2552 7TMOTRY NL BL'STACE Y A KARVONDES AMANDA S.E. LAFrERiy ('ALSO ADW7M IN N.Y.1 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Date: March 2, 2000 To: James D. Foley, Esq_ Raymond Belair (w/o enclosu-•e) Fax: 863-2859 846-4101 Re: IIolmes Rudd Extension Sender: Timothy M. Eutuce, Esq. You should receive 15 Page(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, pleEe call 802) 660-2555, MESSAGE. OF COUNSEL ARTIiUR fit' CERNOS1A Transmitted herewith is my letter of today, together with its enclosure, in co►uiection with the abovc-referenced Tnatter. This nzssagt is intended Only for the use orthe addTasget and may contain inrumianon [hat is priviiepd and ccnfidential. tf ypu are not flit intended nxiPient, you are hmby notified that aT diu minadon pr;%Ig WmmunilMinn i5 4trirtiy prohibited. if you itay. t,;,yt a l n ,a„..... lc«dor. In orror. Plmyg nctlty us inunedlately by tetcphOM (802-660-2555). TTtank you. 03l02%2000 THU 14:53 FAX 8026609119 S"ITZEL PAGE & FLETCHFR f zoo2 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATT012NEYS AT LAW 171 B-.,TTERY STREE"d' P O. BOX 1$07 BUR!NG7b,j, VERMONT o5402-1507 STEWEN F. SrrrZ i (802) 560-2ss5 ( VOICE DO) PA'1M R. PAGEib FAX f?G2) 66p-2552 or 660-9119 R013ER7 E. FLETCHER F--MAlW9RM2555( --!R.MSPF.LgM) wR='S F-;, A11 ( rh.USTACE�*1: 4SPF,C0:N, rpSE?A S. Mri,EAI` '*F=TEK"S FAX (802) 6W-25S2 TIMOTHv M. EUSrACE ARIA kkRVONIDES AMANDA S.$, LkM,.RTY° 1'AL50 .A[M rr7rrD IN N. v,1 March 2, 2000 V1A FACSI ZLE AND Zjj, T CLASS MAIL Uamas D. Foley, Esq. Spokes Foley, PLC 239 South Union Street PO Sox 986 Burlington, VT 05402-0986 RE: Holmes Road ExtprAi nn Dear Jim: OF ('OUNSFL ARTHL'R W, CERNOSIA As discussp(A, I am P,nrin,gi-rVj the following 3,�a�;;ltClll S iUr your review: 1. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Warranty Deed from Dennis L. Blodgett and Ger&ld C. Milot to the City at South Surlington; 2. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and Warranty D6,6,1 Ltc�ul SDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington; and 3. �'torm Drainage casement Dend from BDP Realty Asaociates "o Dennis L. Blodgett and Plaza Investments. A fits ^ 3rnu Yiavu had v-hn17 c C v -L—I ✓w r-17e enclosed documents, please give me a call to discuss. Thank you. Sincerel , Ti .rnnthy M. E•aotace THE/hj Enc1o:3u: e Cc. Raymond Selair (w/o encl.) Robert Rushford, Esq- (w/o encl.) 60n4..;2.Q01 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VO10E/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE a,F1RMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY (-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) February 25, 2000 Robert Rushford, Esq. Gravel & Shea PO Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty Associates/IDX Expansion Sewer Main Easement Dear Bob: Enclosed please find a revised, original Sewer Main Easement and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return. I have revised the description of the easement to account for the jog in the southerly boundary line fo the BDP property. I have also added a reference to the Warranty Deed of Allson Partnership to be BDP Realty (Volume 439, Page 103) to the deed reference paragraph. Please let me know your comments and/or questions. Otherwise, if there is no objection to the form of the document, it may be executed and forwarded to the City offices for recording. Please give me a call if you want to discuss this project further. Also, please let me know when you hear from Plaza Investments' attorney regarding the storm drain easement. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/bj 1 Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair son4253.cor STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAN' ICI BA17ERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 RC RLINGTON, YERMONT 05402-1',07, SEWER MAIN EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont (Grantor), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual right and easement for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring and/or replacing sewer lines, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of the Grantor's property situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more particularly described as follows: Being a strip of land with a uniform width of twenty feet (201) centered on the existing sewer main, beginning near the southwesterly corner of Grantor's property, known and numbered as 1500 Shelburne Road, at the easterly sideline of Route 7 right-of-way, and extending across the southerly portion of Grantor's property in an easterly direction a distance of 570 feet, more or less, to a point near the northwest corner of the lands of Allson Partnership (see Volume 214, Page 451 of the City of South Burlington Land Records); thence continuing in an easterly direction with a uniform width of ten feet (101) along the southerly sideline of Grantor's property a distance of 291 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of Grantor's property at the Green Mountain Drive right- of-way. Said sewer line is more specifically depicted on a plan entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting 1 Engineers, Inc., dated October 18, 1999, last revised January 18, 2000 and recorded in Map Volume , Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the herein Grantor by the following deeds: (1) Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company dated January 18, 1979 and recorded in Volume 146, Page 459 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; (2) Warranty Deed of the City of South Burlington, dated September 9, 1991 and recorded in Volume 317, Page 210 of said Land Records; and (3) Warranty Deed of Allson Partnership dated October 13, 1998 and recorded in Volume 439, Page 103 of said Land Records. Grantor, and its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of the easement by the within Grantee, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said right-of-way easement which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to exercise its rights granted hereunder. The Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this right-of-way easement shall be restored to its condition prior to entryt vim, � a i- 4 +- S r. � .�. a 4 4- L.. .. i.. � L cia �.tY a� 11.E own cost and W11.11111 Q reCLSV11Q1J1e 1.1111e. This right-of-way easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any sanitary sewer pipelines, manholes and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds records thereof, all in further aid of this description. FN DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Witness Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. BY: Duly authorized agent At , in said County, this day of 2000 , duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, personally appeared, and he/she acknowledge this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Son162.zea 3 Before me, Notary Public VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609.1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ' SELLER'S (TRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. BDP Realty Associatesl BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. N0. c ity of South Burlin2 lion 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPfS660CATe 1lt0ursinfu�oad s DATEOFCLOSING INTEREST IN PROPERTY 1. ❑ FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED V2 INTEREST 5. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. :E EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED _% INTEREST 8. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH 707ALACREAGE I BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. LJ NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.7 STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY 6. C MULTI -FAMILY WITH ( nSEgT DWELLING UNITS 10.0 OTHER ) _ r M6eR TRANSFERRED DESCRIBE 3. ❑ SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. C MOBILE HOME 4. ❑ CAMP'VACATION HOME 8. C CONDOMINIUM WITH ( ^SEF' ) UNITS TRANSFERRED CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER :J OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMP VACATION S. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE3. ❑ CAMRVACATION S. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. E OTHER Easeme DESCRIBE DESCRIBE 2. ❑ OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USEB. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appraisal Programs)? ❑ Yes )�3 No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. 2 TOTAL O Ll PRICE PAID FOR 0 Wj PRICE PAID FOR 0 PRICE PAID S PERSONAL PROPERTY 3 REAL PROPERTY S IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: I 0 TAX DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS S • DATE SELLER ACOUIRED 1 9 7 9 IF A VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET 10 (CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TOWN/CITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. LISTED VALUE S PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND UST CATEGORY GRAND LIST OF 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REOUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK TOWN NUMBER Form PT-t (7.2'62) RATESCHEDULE 1. Tax on Special Rate Property: a. Value of purchaser's principal realdence (not io excood S1 tb,000) (See Instructions)............................................................ 1. s_ S 0 b. Value of property enrolled In currem use program...................................................................................................................... b. S C. Value of qualified working farm ...................................................................................................................................................... c. $ d. Add Lines 1(a), (b) and (c)............................................................................................................................................................... d. S a. Tax rate .............................................................................................................................................................................................. e. 1. Tax due on Special Rate Property: Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(a)............................................................................................ f. S 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line 0 on tont of return................................................................................................................................. 2. a. S b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above.................................................................................................................. b. S c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a).................................................................................................................................................... c. S d. Tax rate.............................................................................................................................................................................................. d. a. Tax due on General Rate Property: Multiply line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................................... 3. S 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyers) and Seiier(s) comity as follows: N/A Easement A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the sellers) advised the buyers) that local and state building regulations, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may Ilmlt significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is In compliance with or is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property Is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and Iv In compliance with sold permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel rstalned: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your are& to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller($) further certltiss as follows: D. That this transfer of reel pproperty and any development thereon Is In compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use end Development Law (Act 250), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 25C Permit No. and is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (Ile: exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer does%does not (strike one) result In a partition or division of land. Note: If itdoes, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before filing with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer Is exempt from Income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ® 1. Seller(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no. from the Commissioner of TTaxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee In a foreclosure or transfer In lieu of foreclosure, with no additional- consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFARM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTIFICATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE I BUYER(S) SIGNATURES) DATE BDP Realty Associates City of South Burlington I Its Duly Authorized Agent Its Duly Authorized Agent ` /-- Preparer's Signature / G'`—� Prepared by Timothy M. Eustace, ESq._ Preparer'sAddreas Stitzel, Page & Fletcher Buyer's Representative Tel. PO Box 1507, Burlington, VT J�&4,04pe) -w . 4 :,. y _ re..— 7D' you' STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 OF COUNSEL PATTI R. PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM2555@FIRMSPF.COM) ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE@FIRMSPF.COM) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 JOSEPH S.MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY (-ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) February 10, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND i`T CLASS MAIL Robert Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Paul Street PO Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty Associates/IDX Expansion Dear Bob: I am writing to follow up your most recent correspondence regarding the above -captioned matter - thank you for the copy of the ALTA plan and the easement deeds. As I see it, there are three minor issues that need to be addressed: 1. The conveyance of a utility easement for the sewer main located along the southerly boundary of BDP's property; 2. The drainage easement that runs underneath the Holmes Road Extension; and 3. A Writ of Attachment filed by S.T. Griswold & Co., (recorded in Volume 318, Page 359 of the South Burlington Land Records - see attached). With respect to the sewer main easement, I enclose a form document (draft) which includes the City's standard language and provides for a 20' foot wide easement along the southerly boundary of BDP's property. I order to obtain title to the road free of all encumbrances, the storm drainage easement conveyed by BDP Realty Associates to Dennis Blodgett and Plaza Investments (Volume 275, Page 583) needs to be made subordinate to the City's interest in the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way. The City's preference would be a release of the easement (that portion within the Holmes Road right-of-way) and a grant of a License by the City to Plaza Investments pursuant to 19 V.S.A. § 1111. I have attached a draft License for your review. Alternatively, Robert Rushford, Esq. February 10, 2000 Page 2 the City would require some form of recordable written agreement/acknowledgment that Plaza Investment's easement is subordinate to the City's interest. The City has no interest in obtaining ownership of the drainage line, including responsibility of repair and maintenance. In addition, the City is concerned that issues may arise in the future if road work or expansion affects the drainage line, or some problem with the drainage line adversely impacts the road. Finally, I found the enclosed Writ of Attachment in the course of doing a title update on this property. I was unable to locate a discharge of this lien. If the lien has not been released, the City will require discharge of the lien as to the property being conveyed to the City. After you have a chance to review the enclosed material, please give me a call to discuss. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair son4240.cor LICENSE AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipal corporation situated in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (hereinafter "Grantor"), acting pursuant to the provisions of 19 V.S.A. §1111 does hereby grant to Plaza Investments, a limited partnership of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont ("Grantee"), a revocable license for the purpose of installing, repairing and maintaining a storm drainage line under the Holmes Road Extension, so-called, in the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, all as is more particularly described as follows: A revocable license to install, repair, maintain, or replace a storm drainage line under the Holmes Road Extension to provide access to a storm drainage system and retention pond on lands owned by BDP Realty Associates, known and numbered as 1400 Shelburne Road. This License Agreement benefits a parcel of land conveyed to Grantee by Warranty Deed of Dennis L. Blodgett and Gerald C. Milot, dated November 15, 1988 and recorded in Volume 272, Page 298 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments and records therein referred to, all in further aid of this description. The Grantee agrees that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this revocable license shall be restored to its condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. The Grantee further agrees that it shall be responsible for removing or relocating any sewer line it installs under Holmes Road Extension at its sole expense if such removal or relocation is made necessary by work performed by the City to maintain or improve Holmes Road Extension or other public improvements located within the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way. At any time prior to revocation of this License Agreement by Grantor, Grantee may assign this License Agreement to successor 1 owners of the above -described parcel of land located on the northerly side of the Holmes Road Extension. Grantor may revoke this license at any time for cause. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON has caused this instrument to be executed on its behalf this day of 11 2000 by its duly authorized agent. IN THE PRESENCE OF: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ler By: Charles Hafter,°City Manager STATE OF VERMONT Its Duly Authorized Agent COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Charlotte, in said County and State, on this day of July, 1998, before me personally appeared CHARLES RAFTER, Duly Authorized Agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed as such Duly Authorized Agent and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Son163.rea Notary Public My Commission Expires: ►i SEWER MAIN EASEMENT DRAFT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont corporation with a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont (Grantor), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents do GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality situated in the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont (Grantee) and its successors and assigns, a perpetual right and easement, twenty feet (201) in uniform width, for the purpose of installing, repairing, maintaining, restoring and/or replacing sewer lines, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, under and through a portion of the Grantor's property situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont. The location of said easement is more particularly described as follows: Being a strip pf land with a uniform width of twenty feet (201) centered on the existing sewer main, beginning near the southwesterly corner of Grantor's property, known and numbered as 1500 Shelburne Road, and extending across the southerly portion of Grantor's property in an easterly direction to Grantor's easterly boundary. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the herein Grantor by Warranty Deed of National Life Insurance Company dated January 18, 1979 and recorded in Volume 146, Page 459 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Being also a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the herein Grantor by Warranty Deed of the City of South Burlington, dated September 9, 1991 and recorded in Volume 317, Page 210 of said Land Records. Grantor, and its successors and assigns, shall have the right to make use of the surface of the land subject to this right-of-way easement such as shall not be inconsistent with the use of the easement by the within Grantee, but specifically shall place no structures, landscaping or other improvements within said right-of-way easement which shall prevent or interfere with the Grantee's ability to exercise its rights granted hereunder. The Grantee, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that any premises affected by its entry pursuant to this right-of-way easement shall be restored to its condition prior to such entry at its own cost and within a reasonable time. This right-of-way easement shall act as a bill of sale and does hereby convey any sanitary sewer pipelines, manholes and any appurtenances located on, under and through the easement herein conveyed. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plans and deeds records thereof, all in further aid of this description. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Witness Witness DRAFT By: Duly authorized agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000 , duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, personally appeared, and he/she acknowledge this instrument, by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES Before me, Notary Public SonlQ. rea STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN SUP&: IOR COURT XMTTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Docket No. I"! ILL. S. T. GRISWOLD & COMPANY V. ) i�9 ) 1 BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES TO ANY SHERIFF OR CONSTABLE IN THE STATE: By the authority of the State of Vermont you are hereby commanded to atach the real estate of the BDP Realty Associates to the value of $ � CC'O • � 0 to be held to satisfy any judgment for dzinages and costs that may be recovered by plaintiff S. T. Gris, old & Company, Inc. ;a an action brought by said plaintiff, against said defendant, on November 13, 1997, in the Chittenden Superior Court and make du: return of this vdrit with your doings thereon. A list of exempt property and the Order of Approval of this Court dated November 1997, are attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. Dated: Ncv, , d _ hjJ\rwlstgbdp.woa LAW OFFICES OF K4VOORD,OVERTON & WILSON 3 MAIN STREET ESSEX JUNCTION. VERMONT 054S2-3199 4 L6,11 ry-116(c)-) I Clerk, Chittenden Superior Court CqY CIERKS OFFICN 9.. a ��corded in vd. gig on;6MLLEI 3 q —3V r Burlington land fia a et A Picard, City Clerk ml V f I LAW OFFICES OF :OLVOORD.OVERTON & WILSON �3 MAIN STREET ;SEX JUNCTION, VERMONT OS452-3199 0 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. S. T. GRISWOLD & COMPANY V. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES ClUTTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. A�-'?. 3 — ? 7 V% 2 41997 After notice to defendant and hearing, the Court finds that there is a reasonable likelihood that the plaintiff will recover judgment, including interest and costs, in an amount equal to or greater than $ 5�' because of plaintiffs affidavit that defendant BDP Realty Associates may owe the general contractor, Kessel-Duff, $2,896.01 plus interest and costs at the time plaintiff filed a mechanics lien in the South Burlington Land Records, which sum will likely total or exceed the attachment amount; and further, the Court finds that there is no liability insucince, bond, or other security available to satisfy any judgment against the defendants in this action; therefore, IT IS ORDERED that attachment of the non-exempt real estate and personal property of the defendant BDP Realty Associates in the amount of $ >��' 0 _ is approved. Dated: hjd\rwlstgbdp.ord Presiding Judge, Chittenden Superior Court br da Levitt 2 02!10/2000 THU 11:07 FAX 8020609119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER W STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER., P.dC. ATTORNEYS AT I,AW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 KAUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (SU2) 660-2555 (VQ7CEn'0D; 5TEYCN F. STITZEL FAX (�2) 660-2552 or G60-91I? PATH R, PAQC' E-MAJL(FUW2555(F1W4?Y.00N1) ROBERTE, 7 F.TCUFM wRiTria•Sli-AA1i f 'SYAC�( r•1Rht5YG.00u�t) wpumR•S FAX (SC2) 660-2552 JDSF3 H S. WLEAN TPMOTEY M.LVSTACE MIA KA VOMES AMANDA`,F LAFIhE[Wf I'ALYJ Atwri lY.0 aN AY.) February 10, 2000 VIA PACSIMILE AND I" CLASS MAIL Robert Rushford, Esq. Gravel and Shea 76 St. Faun Street PO BOX 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty Associates/IDX Expansion Dear Bob: OFCOVNSEL ARTRUR W. CERNOSIA I an writing to follow up your most recent correspondence regarding the above -captioned matter - thank you for the copy of the ALTA plan and tho oasement deeds_ As I see it, there are three minor issues that need to be addressed: 1. The conveyance of a utility easement for the sewer main located along the southerly boundary of BDP's property; 2- The drainage easement that rur s underneath the Holmes Road Extension; and 3. A Writ of Attachment filed by S.T. Griswold & Co., (recorded in volume 318, Page 359 of the South Burlington Land Records - see attached). With respect to the sewer main easement, I enclose a form document (draft) which includes the City's standard language and provides for a 20' foot wide easement along the southerly boundary of BDP's property. I order to obtain tithe to the road free!, of all encumbrances, the storm drainage easement conveyed by BDP Realty Associates to Dennis Blodgett and Plaza Investments (Volume 275, Page 583) needs to be made subordinate to the City's interest in tho Holmes Road Extension right-of-way_ The City's preference would be a release of the easement (that portion within the Holmes Road right -of -gray) and a grant of a License by the City to Plaza Investments pursuant to 19 V.S.A. § 1111. I have attached a draft License for your review. Alternatively, 02/10/2000 THL 11:07 FAX 5020609119 STITZEL PAGE & FLETCHER Q 003 Robert Rushford, Esq. February 10, 2000 Page 2 the City would require some form of recordable written agreement/acknowledgment that Plaza Investment's easement is subordinate to the City's interest. The City has no interest in obtaining ownership of the drainage line, including responsibility of repair and maintenance. in addition, the City is concerned that issues may arise in the future if road work or expansion affects the drainage line, or some problem with the drainage line adversely impacts the road. .Finally, I found the enclosed Writ of Attachment in the course of doing a title update on this property. T was unable to locate a discharge of this lien. if the lien has not been released, the City will require discharge of the lien as to the property being conveyed to the City. After you have a chance to review the enclosed material, please give me a call to discuss. Thank you. sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/bj l Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair 40nA946.;t6r 10�'Ad . 0 HARDTOP CP/MP POST TOP Featuring New Form IOX Optical System II F1 N It 02 is GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Post Top Mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CP) or semispherical (MP) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 400 watts. Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class I anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. Optional twin glow rings at post top are available in 4 colors and are illuminated by the primary source. O R D E R I N G HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION PHOTOMETRIC WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS DISTRIBUTIONS CP 17' 1 1 (Horizontal See 120 BLA: Black Anodized HF _ Lamp) Table 208 BRA: Bronze Anodized HS MP 22" 3 (Horizontal Below 240 NA: Natural Anodized LF Lamp) 277 BLP: Black Paint PC ' 347 BRP: Bronze Paint PCR 4X678 (Horizontal 480 NP: Natural Aluminum Paint POLY Lamp) WP: White Paint GRC O (Horizontal SC: Special Color (specify) GRY Lamp) GRG GRR CP17 MP17 CP22 MP22 HF: In Head Fusing HS: House Side Shield (types 3 and 4X only) LF: In Pole Fusing 100 HPS 100 HPS 250 HPS 250 HPS PC': Receptacle and Photocontrol 100 MV 100 MV 250 MV 250 MV PCR': Photocontrol - Receptacle Only 50W MH z 50W MH 2 250 MH 250 MH POLYS': Polycarbonate Sag Lens 70W MH = 70W MH 2 400 HPS 400 HPS GRC: Glow Ring Clear 100 MH 100 MH 400 MV 400 MV GRY: Glow Ring Yellow 150 HPS' 150 HPS' 400 MH 400 MH GRG: Glow Ring Green 175 MV 175 MV GRR: Glow Ring Red 175 MH 175 MH 250 MV 250 MH 1. Furnished with non yellow acrylic sag lens. 5. 175W max on 17" units VS not available with 17" mogul base units 6. 22" units only 2. Medium base lamp 7. Contact factory for availability 3. 55 volt lamp 8. Furnished with sag glass lens 4. Not available in MP units or 480V 9. Not available with 4X 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S. 800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 ® FAX 5101357-3088 o► Gardco O'� FA ;,110-1 if #I :J CA/MA ARM MOUNT GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Round arm mounted Form 10 products are cylindrical (CA) or semi -spherical (MA) sharp cutoff luminaires using high intensity discharge lamps up to 750 wafts (400w in the MA). Housings are one piece seamless spun aluminum and finished with either Architectural Class 1 anodizing or electrostatically applied polyurethane. Luminaires can accept one of six (6) interchangeable and rotatable precision segmented optical systems. O R D E R I N G HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS CA 17 1 3 250MH 120 BRA HF CA MA 17" 22" H 1 1 (Horizontal Lamp) SEE TABLE BELOW 120 208 BLA BRA HS HF �. o 3 (Horizontal 240 NA LF 2 Lamp) 277 BLP MF 4X67 (Horizontal Lamp) 347 480 BRP NP PC PCR 3 Q (Horizontal Lamp) QUAD WP Sc POLY AP FM (Horizontal Lamp) AT SG 4 VS' (Vertical Lamp) QSPTF TYPE HOUSING DIAMETER CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS WATTAGE OPTIONS FINISH Housing CA17 MA17 CA22 MA22 HS Internal House Side Shield BLA Black Anodized 100 HPS 100 HPS 250 HPS 250 HPS HF In -Head Fusing BRA Bronze Anodized 100 MV 100 MV 250 MV 250 MV LF In -Line Fusing NA Natural Anodized 50 MH` 50 MH' 250 MH 250 MH MF Mast Arm Fitter (CA only) BRP Bronze Paint 70 MH' 70 MH2 400 HPS 400 HPS PC Receptacle and Photocontrol' BLP Black Paint 100 MH' 100 MHZ 400 MV 400 MV PCR Photocontrol Receptacle only' NP Natural Aluminum Paint 150 HPS' 150 HPS' 400 MH 400 MH POLY Polycarbonate Sag Lens in lieu of Glass' WP White Paint 175 MV 175 MV 750 HPS, SG Sag Glass SC Special Color Paint 175 MH 175 MH 750 MH; (Supplied standard with Type 4X optics 250 MV and CA22 750w luminaires) 250 MH AP Adjustable Knuckle - Pole Mount AT Adjustable Knuckle - Tenon Mount OS Quartz Restrike' NOTES PTF Pole Top Fitter 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S. 800/227-0758 1. Furnished with acrylic sag lens. VS not available 5. 175W max on 17' units CA 510/357-69M with 17' mogul base 6. Available with 22" units only FAX 510/357-3088 2. Medium base lamp 7. Furnished with sag glass lens http://www.thomaslighting.com 3. 150HPS ballast operates 55 volt lamp 8. Not available with Type 4X— AS Gardco ,a , GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Gardco Bollard 10 luminaires provide efficient low glare illumination from a highly durable seamless architectural form. Utilizing the Form 10 faceted optical system, precise beam control is achieved and discomforting brightness is eliminated. A .250" cast aluminum housing and .188" injection molded acrylic lens assures exceptional vandal resistance. Each Gardco BR160/162/163 is a bollard luminaire utilizing 50W through 175W high intensity discharge lamps. Units are totally sealed and gasketed, preventing intrusion of moisture, dust and insects into the lamp or electrical chambers. O R D E R I N G PREFIX OPTICS HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS BR160 T3 42 175MH 277 — WP F j BR160 14"' 50MH 120 BRP F BR162 3 42'2 70MH 208 BLP DUP' BR163 100MH 240 WP GFCI BR163B Q 175MH 277 NP BR163G 100MV VP FM 175MV SC 50HPS' 1. BR130 only 70HPS 2. BR152, 163 only 100HPS 3. 120/277V Primary only 4. BR162 only 150HPS TYPE PREFIX OPTICS HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS PREFIX FINISH OPTIONS BR 160 Head Only BRP Bronze Paint F In -Line Primary Fuse BR 162 With Cast Aluminum Base BLP Black Paint DUP Duplex Receptacle' BR 163 Natural Concrete Base NP Natural Aluminum Paint GFCI GFCI Receptacle` BR 163E Beige Concrete Base WP White Paint BR 163G Dark Gray Concrete Base VP Verde Green Paint weathertight. flush -mounted in Special concrete colors and textures are SC Special Color (Specify) lower housing (BR162 only) available. Consult factory. ----- Base supplied by others '---- --- - - - - - ' BR 160 BR 163 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro. CA 94577 U.S. 800i227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 510/357-3088 http://www.thomaslightina.com 11 20 l C .� DOME TOP BOLLARD I -J; i J, Me GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Gardco's BRM800 Dome Top Bollard provides uniform illumination, wide spacings and remarkable brightness control. Rugged extruded and cast construction with silicone seals and gasketing assures years of trouble free service. O R D E R I N G PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS BRM 800 42" 70 HIPS 120 WP SHD BRM 800 42" 50MH 120 BRP F 36" 70MH 208 BLP SHD 30" 10OMH 240 NP BCC 24" 50MV 277 WP DUP 75MV SC GFCI 100MV 35HPS 2 50HPS' 70HPS 100HPS INC' TYPE PREFIX HEIGHT WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 BRM800 NOTES FINISH OPTIONS 1. Use medium base BRP: Bronze Paint F: In -Line Primary Fuse lamps only. BLP: Black Paint SHD: 180° Shield 2. 120 volt primary only. NP: Natural Aluminum Paint BCC: Black Center Column 3. 120/277V primary only. p ry Y WP: White Paint DUP: Duplex receptacle' 4. Maximum wattage: VP: Verde Green Paint GFCI: GFCI receptacle' 10OW A-19. SC: Special Color Weathertight, flush -mounted (specify) in lower housing. 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 U.S.800/227-0758 CA 510/357-6900 FAX 510/357-3088 BRM 800 LINE SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Each mcPhilben 106 Line luminaire is a wall mounted cutoff luminaire for high intensity discharge or compact fluorescent lamps. Internal components are totally enclosed, rain - tight, dust -tight and corrosion resistant. Housing, back plate and door frame are die cast aluminum. Three (3) optical systems are available. Luminaires are suitable for wet locations (damp locations if inverted). HOUSING Single piece quarter sphere housings are die cast aluminum. A memory retentive gasket seals the housing with the doorframe to exclude moisture, dust, insects and pollutants from the optical system. A black, die cast ribbed backplate dissipates heat for longer lamp and ballast life. DOORFRAME A single piece die cast aluminum door frame integrates to the housing form. The door frame is hinged closed and secured to the housing with two (2) captive stainless steel fasteners. The heat and impact resistant 1/8" tempered glass lens and one-piece gasket are mechanically secured to the door frame with five (5) galvanized steel retainers. OPTICAL SYSTEMS Reflectors are composed of specular extruded and faceted Alzak® components, electro- polished, anodized and sealed. Reflector segments are set in arc tube image duplicating patterns to achieve the Wide Throw, Medium Throw or the Forward Throw distributions. ELECTRICAL Each high power factor ballast is the separate component type capable of providing reliable lamp starting to -20°F (-29°C). High pressure sodium ballast operate lamps within ANSI trapezoidal limits. Metal halide ballasts are medium regulation auto -transformers or reactors providing ±10% power regulation with ±10% variation from rated input voltage. Component - to -component wiring within the luminaire will carry no more than 80% of rated current and is listed by UL for use at 600VAC at 150OF (65°C) or higher. Standard and dimming fluorescent units have a starting temperature of 0°F (-180C). Dimming range is 15% to 100% Standard fluorescent ballasts are solid state. Consult factory for magnetic. LAMPHOLDER Pulse rated medium base sockets are glazed porcelain with nickel plated screw shell. Fluorescent sockets are high temperature plastic (PBT) with brass alloy contacts. FINISH Each standard color luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, textured polyester powdercoat finish. Consult factory for special colors. LABELS All fixtures bear IBEW, CSA and UL Wet Location labels. rl 0 w 1 106 QUARTER SPHERE SCONCES 1-�45.72 cm 106 - Quarter Sphere Sconce - 4 5/16" _ - 10.95 cm O O I 3' 7.62 cm O O 1 Mounting Bolt Pattern The mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting 106 Quarter Sphere Sconce design is protected by U.S. Patent # DES. 390,999. mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting reserves the right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification as part of the company's continuing product improvement program. © Copyright mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting 1998. All Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 800/227-0758 510/357-6900 (California) 510/357-3088 FAX http://www.mcphilbenoutdoor.com In Canada: Lumec C&I 640 Cure Boivin Blvd. Boisbriand Quebec, Canada J7G 2A7 Tel: 450/430-7040 Fax: 450/430-1453 mcPhilben 9315-15998 Geniyte Thomas Group LLC 94 LINE 946 ORDERING it IP2 946 HIGH OUTPUT RECESSED AISLE LIGHT The mcPhilben Outdoor 946 high output recessed aisle lights are architecturally styled luminaires precisely constructed of cast aluminum. The 946 is specifically designed to incorporate state of the art high lumen per watt H.I.D. sources to 100W. Precisely positioned microbaffles ensure minimal faceplate brightness. A field convertible junction box further enhances its design flexibility. Self - compensating silicone gasketing completely excludes moisture, insects and contaminants. An optional cast guard provides added vandal protection to the horizontal aperture. • Contemporary soft cornered architectural styling. • Recessed scoop design assures exceptionally low brightness. • Optical system provides high light levels and remarkably wide spacings. PREFIX WALL TYPE LAMP VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 946 C 100 MH 120 BRP F 946 D=Drywall D TYPE 120 BRP Bronze Paint F Fusing Not suitable for concrete pour applications. 35 HPS' 277' BLP Black Paint CG Cast guard Also, if insulating material is present. it must 50 HPS WP White Paint over lens be kept at least 3" away from luminaire. 50 MH NP Natural Note: Type D units are thermal) YP y protected. 50 MV Aluminum Paint SC Special Color C=Concrete pour (specify) Suitable for concrete pour applications only. C TYPE 35 HPS` 50 MH 50 MV 50 HPS 70 MH 75 MV 70 HPS 100 MH 100 MV NOTE: Back housings for concrete pour 100 HPS applications are available for pre - shipment. Contact factory for details. 277V not available with 35 HPS TYPE PREFIX WALL TYPE LAMP VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting In Canada: 2661 Alvarado Street Lumec C&I San Leandro, CA 94577 640 Cure Boivin Blvd. 800/227-0758 Boisbriand 510/357-6900 (California) Quebec, Canada RG 2A7 510/357-3088 FAX Tel: 450/430-7040 http://www.mcphilbenoutdoor.com Fax: 450/430-1453 C �'' OUTDOOR mcPhilben TD Genlyte Thomas Grouo LLC 9� LINE ' 942 RGD Ribbed Guard/Diffuse Glass 942 & 943 RECESSED AISLE LIGHTS The mcPhilben Outdoor 942 and 943 recessed aisle lights are architecturally styled luminaires precisely constructed of diecast aluminum. The horizontally mounted 942 and vertically mounted 943 were specifically designed to incorporate long -life compact fluorescent lamps and low wattage H.I.D. sources to 100W. A field adjustable junction box further enhances its design flexibility. Self -compensating silicone gasketing completely excludes moisture, insects and contaminants. A choice of (3) architecturally designed faceplates allows for a variety of applications. The ribbed guard option offers vandal protection for glass lenses. • Rugged die cast construction. • Vertical mount 943 aisle light offers high lumen sources in a slim luminaire. • Unique Ribbed Guard faceplate offers low brightness, excellent vandal resistance and ORDERING remarkably high light levels. PREFIX WALL TYPE LAMP FACEPLATE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 942 D 213TF LV 120 BRP F Horizontal 942 Vertical 943 25" Bollard 943625 4 40" Bollard 9431340 4 D=Drywall Not suitable for concrete pour applications. Also, if insulating material is present, it must be kept at least 3" away from luminaire. Note: Type D units are thermally protected. C=Concrete pour Suitable for concrete pour D Tvoe (2) 13W Twin Tubes (213TF) (1) 28W Quad Tube (28QF) 112 35 HPS 3 50 MH 50 MV 50 HPS C Type (2) 100 INC t (2) 13W Twin Tubes (213TF) (1) 28W Quad Tube (28QF) 1.2 942 120 LV Louver 2773 DG Diffuse Glass PG Prismatic Glass RGD Ribbed Guard/ Diffuse Glass RGP Ribbed Guard/ Prismatic Glass BRP Bronze Paint F Fusing BLP Black Paint WP White Paint NP Natural Aluminum Paint SC Special Color (consult factory) applications only. 35 HPS 3 50 MH 50 My 943 50 HPS 70 MH 75 MV LV Louver 70 HPS 100 MH 100 MV DG Diffuse Glass NOTE: Back housings for concrete pour 100 HPS RGD Ribbed Guard/ Diffuse Glass applications are available for pre- RF Stacked Specular Louvers shipment. Contact factory for details. behind Tempered Glass 1. 120V only RFPLY Stacked Specular Louvers 2. Suitable for -20°F starting temperature behind Clear Polycarbonate 3. 277V not available with 35 HPS 4. Contact factory for availability TYPE PREFIX WALLTYPE LAMP FACEPLATE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS mcPhilben Outdoor Lighting 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro, CA 94577 800/227-0758 510/357-6900 (California) 510/357-3088 FAX http://www.mcphilbenoutdoor.com Genlvte Thomas Group LLC In Canada: Lumec C&I 640 Cure Boivin Blvd. Boisbriand Quebec, Canada RG 2A7 Tel: 450/430-7040 Fax: 450/430-1453 mcPhilblen Features • Tamper proof design. • Completely sealed optical compartment. • Enclosed wireway mounting knuckle. • Machined aluminum construction with stainless steel hardware. Available in Brass, see page 72. 2 1/4" Dia. `��\ 4 318" Y 1"< MR-16 Lamp 1 Sie" 1 viz' Pipe Thread 8 k' 1-1 it Nite Star IITm allows the MR16 lamp to be recessed into the machined aluminum housing, providing deep cutoff for brightness control. The lens is still flush with the end of the fixture so that dirt and debris cannot collect inside like an open cup cutoff design. With a full complement of optical accessories available, the Nite Star II is an economical, deep cutoff lighting instrument. • Clear, tempered glass lens, factory sealed. • 1' & 61 Listed with MR16 lamps to 50 watts. • For use with remote transformers, see pages 74, 76 and 79. CATALOG NUMBER LOGIC Example: NS II - 7 - BLW - 9 - 11 Series 1 1 1 1 1 Lamp Type 0 - By others 1 - ESX(20W), 120 Spot 2 - BAB(20W), 40° Flood 3 - FRB(35W), 12° Spot 4 - FRA(35W), 23° N. Flood S - FMW(35W), 400 Flood 15 - EYR(42W), 120 Spot 16 - EYS(42W), 25° N. Flood 17 - EYP(42W), 40° Flood 6 - EXT(50W), 13° Spot 7 - EXZ(50W), 26° N. Flood 8 - EXN(50W), 40° Flood 9 - FNV(50W), 60° W. Flood Powder Coat Color Satin Wrinkle Bronze BZP BZW Black BLP BLW White(Gloss)WHIP WHW Verde — VER Lens Type 9 - Clear (Standard), 10 - Spread, 13 - Rectilinear Shielding 11 - Honeycomb Baffle GLA )ED UPLIGHT FIXT. AE WITH ELECTROLUMINESCENT DIODES 33/16"inches UPLIGHT FIXTURE: red 3300* RECESSED CONNECTION BOX (w/o transformer) : red 33009/24 RECESSED CONN. BOX (with transformer 120/24) : red 33009/120 APPLICATIONS ■ SECURITY LIGHTING ■ PARKING LIGHT VEHICLES ■ PEDESTRIAN AREAS EXTERN. ■ GROUND LIGHTS ■ AMBIENT LIGHTING PARKING HEAVY VEHICLES ■ PEDESTRIAN AREAS INTERN. ■ WALL LIGHTS ■ ARCHITECTURAL DECOR ■ RISERS ■ TRAFFIC CIRCLE - MARKER SIGNS ■ ROOF LIGHTS NOte : This uplight fixture can be used without recessed connection box. ELECTRICAL FEATURES Diameter of diodes : 3/,s" - Quantity of diodes : 19 Colors (*) : yellow 2 - red 3 - green 4 - blue 5 - white 0 Consumpt.: less than 4 watts - LED life: 200,000 hours t"(H) Voltage : 12 volts upon request Reference IP ! Impact resistance glass polycarbonate ---- 13300 65 _- — 66 0 2 13300 + 133009/24 0 I 2 13300 + 133009/120 j 65 0 2 DIMENSIONS 0 OD : 33/16" - Thickness: 3/16" Recessed : 2" / 33/1a" - Depth : 7/6" / 51/a" PACKAGE CONTENTS UPLIGHT FIXTURE ref.13300' 3 screws TFPz M4.40 - 3 struts '/s' 3 wood screws TFPz/90 4.40 - 3 pins "Rawl" Ya" RECESSED CONNECTION BOX ref. 133009/120 1 transformer 120/24 v - 2 plastic cable glands ref.7P 1 inlet plug - 1 inlet plug Low Voltage RECESSED CONNECTION BOX ref.133009/24 2 plastic cable glands ref.7P - 1 inlet plug Low Voltage UPLIGHT FIXTURE ref.13300* 33'is" o - - T ALUMINUM or BRASS BODY LEAD 2- LENGTH 10' <—--------- y DIFFUSER O 11 N" O GLASS orPOLYCARBONATE O 0,_ 19 DIODES 1,W �I O , RECESSED CONNECTION BOX ref. 133009/120 ref.133009/24 1 TRANSFORMER 120124 v 2 CABLE GLANDS reI.7P 2 CABLE GLANDS re1.7P 1 INLET PLUG 1 INLET PLUG 1 INLET PLUG LOW VOLTAGE 1 EARTH CONNECTION I I I A w I ELI�.- Y 3Ys" �j 16 4, Specifications LTV50 Series Accent or Wall Wash Nuv OwfvM Columns LTV50, LTV51, LTV54 9'{ Architectural Trees Accent 360 LTV52, LTV53 LTV Signs Facades Drive -over durability: When installed in concrete (see page 19), fixture will with- stand drive -over by vehicles weighing up to 5,500 lb. Lens Ring: One piece cast bronze, natural finish. Eight captive 5/16' blackened stainless steel hex -socket cap screws. Lens: Clear tempered borosilicate glass, 1/4'thick, flush with lens ring, slightly crowned. Lens Gasket: One piece molded silicone, U-channel wraps completely around lens flange. Housing: High temperature, compression molded, fiberglass impregnated, 3/16 min. wall composite. Charcoal gray. No top lip to trap dirt and moisture. Solid brass knurled inserts mold- ed -in to receive lens ring screws. Separate splice and ballast compartments, individual cast aluminum internal covers, with silicone gaskets. Two 3/4' NPT in bottom, 24 cu. in. splice area. Modular reverse draft design (top dia. smaller than bottom), body and ballast modules epoxy bonded. Optical System: SP and NF - Spot or Narrow Flood spun aluminum reflector, specular Alzak®, black Duranodic® arc tube glare shield on SP only. PR - for PAR38 reflector lamps, or PAR36 and AR111 12V, lamps in LTV54 only. All sockets 4KV medium base. All optical systems yoke mounted, 3600 rotation, t 15° vertical adjustment, locking screws, black anodized U.V. shield for housing interior. WW - one piece hydroformed reflector, specular Alzak®, 3600 rotation and screw locks, Wall Wash distribution, medium base 4KV socket for HID lamps, mini -can socket for halogen lamps. Electrical Module: High power factor ballast, -20OF starting, factory mounted to gasketed compartment cover, LTV50 and LTV52 only. Wiring: Anti -siphon barriers on all wiring to and from ballast compartment. All components wire linked for ground, quick -disconnect for removal of optical system. Certification: U.L. listed to U.S. and Canadian safety standards. Fixture manufacturer shall be registered to ISO 9001. -IVnJ M H PATZ- 1 04"f Optical Adjustment 15` 15' Vertical adjustment shown for LTV50. LTV51 and LTV54 only. I 3/4' 1 1 I 113/4' (2) 3/4' NPT 10" "r 01 F�� ■w TM .11ly HEALTHCARE :4 FORMATIORI SOLUT50MG November 4, 1999 Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed, please find our progress report on the Transportation Demand Management Plan. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me on 864-1758 x 4018. Sincerer, L nne A. Berry �VV( Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo Manager, Facilities & Administration Enclosure 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN IDX Systems Corporation has taken steps to administer the Transportation Demand Management Plan by doing the following: IDX Corporate Monthly Newsletter We communicated our need to implement a Transportation Demand Management Plan as part of our State and local permit process for our Burlington campus expansion project, advising our employees where this information can be found. Facilities Database Current CCTA information on the Ride Share program was requested and partially entered into our Facilities Database. We expect this to be completed within the next few days. Upon completion an e-mail will be sent to our employees providing a direct link to this information in our database. CCTA Posters We have requested CCTA posters to be posted in the bulletin board areas in each of our buildings as a reminder to our employees. Traffic Survey IDX is currently in the process of conducting a traffic survey that was prepared by IDX together with Jeanne McCormack of the CCTA. There were some technical difficulties in preparing the survey, along with some internal moves and re -organizations; therefore, it was decided that we would achieve better results by waiting to issue the survey. We will be in a position to issue the survey within the next few weeks, provided that our IS department can assist us in meeting our schedule. Once the survey has been completed, the results will be collected and then given to the CCTA to compile the results. Based on the survey results, IDX will then look into the feasibility of implementing programs. Flexible Hours Policy Attached is our Flexible Hours Policy as posted in our Human Resources Database. IDX Systems Corporation ` ; 5 a�ro rapt WORK TIME & TIME OFF -1 Section. Flexible Schedule Topic: Flexible Schedule THIS GUIDE IS NOT A CONTRACT. THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE ARE SUMMARIES OF THE COMPANY'S POLICIES. FORA COMPLETE WRITTEN COPY OF ANY POLICY, CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. IDX POLICIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON. IDX will try to accommodate an employee's request to work a flexible schedule based on several factors including needs of the business, customer and department. Please see your manager or Human Resources Representative for more details. (Please see "Family/Medical Leave" for information regarding working a flexible schedule due to your awn serious health condition, or the serious health condition of your child, spouse or parent.) Once a flexible schedule has been arranged with your manager, please submit this form to Human Resources: CONFIDENTIAL �r IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN IDX Systems Corporation has taken steps to administer the Transportation Demand Management Plan by doing the following: IDX Corporate Monthly Newsletter We communicated our need to implement a Transportation Demand Management Plan as part of our State and local permit process for our Burlington campus expansion project, advising our employees where this information can be found. Facilities Database Current CCTA information on the Ride Share program was requested and partially entered into our Facilities Database. We expect this to be completed within the next few days. Upon completion an e-mail will be sent to our employees providing a direct link to this information in our database. CCTA Posters We have requested CCTA posters to be posted in the bulletin board areas in each of our buildings as a reminder to our employees. Traffic Survey IDX is currently in the process of conducting a traffic survey that was prepared by IDX together with Jeanne McCormack of the CCTA. There were some technical difficulties in preparing the survey, along with some internal moves and re -organizations; therefore, it was decided that we would achieve better results by waiting to issue the survey. We will be in a position to issue the survey within the next few weeks, provided that our IS department can assist us in meeting our schedule. Once the survey has been completed, the results will be collected and then given to the CCTA to compile the results. Based on the survey results, IDX will then look into the feasibility of implementing programs. Flexible Hours Policy Attached is our Flexible Hours Policy as posted in our Human Resources Database. IDX Systems Corporation ■Y� Chapter#: 5 Chapter: WORK TIME & TIME OFF Section: Flexible Schedule Topic: Flexible Schedule THIS GUIDE IS NOT A CONTRACT. THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED ON THIS PAGE ARE SUMMARIES OF THE COMPANY'S POLICIES. FORA COMPLETE WRITTEN COPY OF ANY POLICY, CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. IDX POLICIES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY REASON. IDX will try to accommodate an employee's request to work a flexible schedule based on several factors including needs of the business, customer and department. Please see your manager or Human Resources Representative for more details. (Please see "Family/Medical Leave" for information regarding working a flexible schedule due to your own serious health condition, or the serious health condition of your child, spouse or parent.) Once a flexible schedule has been arranged with your manager, please submit this form to Human Resources: ,A CONFIDENTIAL Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1996 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: NA' Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Fi jHorizontal Muminance Calculation Grid Summary Grid Name: Whole Room Horizontal Grid Grid Type: Horizontal Illuminance Grid Units: Footcandles Grid Origin: (0.00, 0,00) Grid Orient: Grid Elev.: 2.50 Grid Surface: n/a Grid Hinge: 0 Grid Azimuth: 0 Statistical Area Summary Stat. Area Ave Max Min Ave/Min Max/Min Std. Dev. Whole Room Horizontal Grid 5.28 24.80 0.82 6.44 30.24 3.71 Calculation Grid ' 5.00 15.00 25.00 35.00 45.00 55.00 65.00 75.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 125.00 235.00 4.17 4.11 7.07 7.72 4.64 4.85 4.00 4.40 3.79 2.68 225.00 7.46 7.56 12.43 12.93 8.82 8.55 6.80 8.76 5.89 4.16 215.00 5.38 6.76 10.23 11.37 7.72 6.86 6.15 7.53 6.81 3.30 205.00 596 7.48 11.53 12.50 8.48 7.59 6.77 8.1E, 6.71 3.66 195.00 8.32 8.89 14.21 14.79 10.44 9.57 7.56 9.45 6.50 4.43 185.00 8.08 10.94 14.63 15.49 11.96 9.21 8.99 8.74 7.70 3.61 175.00 7.74 15.95 17.03 18.88 17.28 9.94 10.89 8.46 7.55 4.24 1.94 2.07 1.86 165.00 8.25 17.63 17.76 20.08 18.73 10.13 13.33 9.83 6.83 6.45 2.57 2.57 3.19 155.00 10.74 21.52 21.95 24.80 23.55 12.88 13.58 9.15 7.47 7.01 4.24 5.57 4.37 145.00 9.34 18.61 18.58 20.99 19.76 10.73 13.22 7.69 7.21 6.99 5.43 7.00 4.68 135.00 9.80 20.80 19.83 23.14 22.05 11.90 14.11 9.25 6.52 6.91 3.20 3.48 3.30 125.00 6.13 9.79 9.79 10.79 10.12 6.63 9.67 8.87 6.57 4.34 2.56 2.85 2.50 115.00 6.12 5.35 6.49 8.22 5.83 2.96 1.55 1.47 1.46 105.00 1.15 3.05 4.41 6.96 4.66 4.62 4.39 4.69 4.40 95.00 0.90 2.32 5.49 9.10 5.88 5.43 5.68 7.88 7.05 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting4echnologies.com Calculation Grid: Wt )Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Flc (Page 2) Horizontal Illuminance Calculation Grid 135.00 145.00 155.00 165.00 175.00 185.00 195.00 205.00 215.00 225.00 235.00 245.00 255.00 235.00 1 1.44 1.76 1.69 1.70 1.64 1.89 1.60 1.63 1.79 1.67 1.74 1.66 1.87 225.00 215.00 205.00 195.00 185.00 175.00 165.00 155.00 145.00 135.00 125.00 115.00 105.00 95.00 2.79 2.87 2.88 4.95 3.06 2.92 3.24 3.84 2.93 2.76 5.06 3.14 2.78 4.84 7.74 4.99 6.03 4.42 5.72 6.27 4.59 7.94 5.11 5.68 5.35 7.64 5.12 6.35 4.46 5.35 6.35 5.21 7.77 5.18 6.13 5.64 2.85 2.89 3.09 3.45 2.76 2.95 5.68 2.89 2.86 2.75 2.42 2.74 2.44 2.51 2.61 2.49 2.79 2.45 2.72 1.93 2.00 1.98 2.10 1.91 2.13 1.94 1.97 2.00 1.95 2.14 1.94 2.11 3.57 2.45 2.65 4.86 2.64 2.52 3.17 3.54 2.45 2.60 4.90 2.67 2.49 5.33 5.71 4.57 7.62 4.46 5.55 4.33 5.35 5.70 4.40 7.74 4.53 5.32 5.70 7.04 5.76 7.83 5.74 6.93 4.63 5.79 7.02 5.48 8.02 5.85 6.59 3.84 3.37 3.36 5.85 3.41 3.42 3.27 3.86 3.36 3.22 5.94 3.47 3.28 2.60 2.72 2.61 2.79 2.51 2.84 2.47 2.55 2.71 2.56 2.83 2.53 2.80 1.51 1.44 1.48 1.43 1.44 1.45 1.44 1.47 1.43 1.43 1.47 1.46 1.43 4.56 4.85 4.21 3.80 4.37 4.62 4.36 4.55 4.83 4.08 3.89 4.40 4.51 1 6.86 7.89 5.22 6.24 5.74 7.80 6.99 6.92 7.85 4.97 6.41 5.79 7.50 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technoiogies.com Calculation Grid: Wt Horizontal IDuminance Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Flc �1) (Page 3) Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technolog;es.com Calculation Grid: Wl Horizontal Illuminance Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Fle f) (Page 4) MEL Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technoiogies.com FCalculation Grid: W' ) Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Fl( (Page 5) LM Horizontal Uluminance Calculation Grid 135M0 145.00 155.00 165.00 175.00 185.00 195.00 205.00 215.00 225.00 235.00 245.00 255.00 85.00 6.60 8.25 5.13 6.07 5.56 8.22 6.86 6.61 8.23 4.97 6.18 5.59 8.03 75.00 4.21 4.32 3.67 3.81 3.75 4.30 4.18 4.17 4.31 3.61 3.85 3.78 4.27 65.00 1.41 1.39 1.43 1.39 1.38 1.41 1.38 1.36 1.39 1.39 1.42 1.41 1.40 55.00 1.29 1.29 1.31 1.19 1.26 1.31 1.23 1.25 1.29 1.27 1.23 1.28 1.30 45.00 4.27 4.42 3.94 3.64 3.96 4.26 4.20 4.23 4.41 3.88 3.68 3.98 4.23 35.00 6.53 7.31 4.88 6.08 5.22 7.31 6.84 6.54 7.29 4.73 6.19 5.25 7.12 25.00 6.85 8.71 5.36 6.16 5.99 8.60 6.93 6.91 8.68 5.11 6.33 6.03 8.30 15.00 4.38 4.64 3.82 3.86 4.05 4.55 4.23 4.38 4.62 3.70 3.95 4.08 4.43 5.00 1.20 1.21 1.23 1.17 1.20 1.22 1.18 1.17 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.22 1.19 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 19M Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technoiGgies.com Calculation Grid: W' Room Horizontal Grid (Garage Fl( ll) (Page 6) Horizontal Illuminance Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: A )rary Grid (Site) 1�A- M Horizontal Illuminance Calculation Grid Summary Grid Name: Arbitrary Grid Grid Origin: (-1.00, -1.00) Grid Surface: u/a Grid Type: Horizontal Illuminance Grid Orient: Grid Hinge: 0 Grid Units: Footcandles Grid Elev.: 0.00 Grid Azimuth: 0 Statistical Area Summary Stat. Area Ave Max Min Ave/Min MaxMlin Std. Dev. Arbitrary Grid 1.76 13.00 0.10 17.60 130.00 2.40 Calculation Grid 5.00 15.00 25.00 35.00 45.00 55.00 65.00 75.00 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 125.00 235.00 0.33 0.31 0.27 0.47 3.76 10.93 11.87 1.51 0.22 0.13 0.40 3.69 10.42 225.00 2.92 1.14 0.57 0.50 1.46 3.85 2.94 0.76 0.26 0.19 0.35 1.31 3.29 215.00 10.33 3.21 0.86 0.49 0.64 0.90 0.79 0.46 0.26 0.29 0.28 0.53 0.77 205.00 10.57 2.77 0.78 0.71 0.62 0.90 0.99 0.48 0.41 0.22 0.50 0.54 0.87 195.00 1.87 0.86 0.50 0.66 1.54 2.96 2.77 1.24 0.36 0.11 0.51 1.49 2.94 185.00 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.92 3.37 7.15 7.54 2.39 0.69 0.34 0.83 3.34 7.14 175.00 0.60 0.50 0.48 0.77 3.03 6.15 6.51 2.17 0.55 0.25 0.66 3.00 6.14 165.00 5.93 1.76 0.64 0.77 1.19 1.78 1.92 1.02 0.45 0.16 0.58 1.13 1.76 155.00 10.77 3.46 0.91 0.58 0.43 0.56 0.53 0.32 0.35 0.29 0.37 0.36 0.54 145.00 8.71 2.15 0.72 0.62 0.46 0.70 0.81 0.36 0.38 0.26 0.44 0.41 0.69 135.00 0.85 0.54 0.38 0.60 1.47 2.89 2.70 1.20 0.35 0.11 0.50 1.44 2.88 125.00 0.16 0.21 0.33 0.85 3.34 7.13 7.53 2.38 0.68 0.34 0.82 3.33 7.13 115.00 2.99 6.14 6.50 2.16 0.54 0.25 0.66 2.99 6.14 105.00 1.12 1.76 1.91 1.01 0.44 0.15 0.58 1.13 1.76 95.00 0.34 0.53 0 51 0.31 0.33 0.27 0.36 0.35 0.53 Output Generated by lurnen Micro 7.5. Copyright 19% lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: A )rary Grid (Site) (Page 2) Horizontal Illuminance Calculation Grid 1135.00 145.00 155.00 165.00 175.00 185.00 195.00 205.00 215.00 225.00 235.00 245.00 255.00 235.00 10.76 1.44 0.23 0.12 0.33 2.96 11.66 12.02 194 0.25 0.13 0.31 3.02 225.00 2.52 0.71 0.26 0.18 0.33 1.21 3.69 3.18 0.88 0.28 0.19 0.36 1.39 215.00 0.69 0.42 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.55 0.86 0.81 0.48 0.27 0.31 0.33 0.69 205.00 0.96 0.46 0.40 0.21 0.50 0.55 0.89 0.99 0.49 0.42 0.22 0.59 0.70 195.00 2.75 1.23 0.36 0.11 0.51 1.50 2.95 2.76 1.24 0.37 0.13 0.48 1.83 185.00 7.54 2.39 0.69 0.34 0.83 3.34 7.14 7.54 2.39 0.69 0.39 0.96 3.81 175.00 6.50 2.16 0.55 0.25 0.66 3.00 6.14 6.50 2.16 0.54 0.23 0.62 2.59 165.00 1.91 1.01 0.45 0.16 0.58 1.13 1.76 1.91 1.01 0.45 0.16 0.55 0.73 155.00 0.52 0.31 0.35 0.29 0.37 0.35 0.54 0.52 0.32 0.34 0.30 0.29 0.29 145.00 0.80 0.35 0.37 0.25 0.40 0.38 0.76 0,77 0.37 0.41 0.25 0.43 0.40 135.00 2.70 1.20 0.35 0.10 0.42 1.33 2.82 2.82 1.33 0.42 0.11 0.50 1.45 125.00 7.52 2.38 0.68 0.29 0.74 2.82 7.32 7.32 2.82 0.75 0.37 0.83 3.34 115.00 6.50 2.16 0.54 0.21 0.59 2.54 6.36 6.36 2.54 0.60 0.27 0.67 2.99 105.00 1.91 1.01 0.44 0.14 0.51 1.11 1.80 1.80 1.11 0.51 0.16 0.59 1.13 95.00 0.50 0.31 0.33 0.27 0.35 0.32 0.52 0.52 0.33 0.35 0.29 0.37 0.35 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.l ig hting-technologies. com Calculation Grid: Ai }ary Grid (Site) (Page 3) Horizontal Illuminance Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: At lary Grid (Site) (Page 4) LM I Horizontal Illuminance Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: At }ary Grid (Site) (Page 5) 1 LM Horizontal Illuminance Calculation Grid 135.00 145.00 155.00 165.00 175.00 185.00 195.00 205.00 215.00 225.00 235.00 245.00 255.00 85.00 0.64 0.32 0.38 0.26 0.38 0.32 0.64 0.64 0.33 0.38 0.27 0.38 0.33 75.00 65.00 55.00 45.00 35.00 25.00 15.00 5.00 2.69 1.23 0.44 0.11 0.44 1.23 2.69 2.69 1.23 0.44 0.11 0.44 1.23 6.47 2.64 0.67 0.29 0.67 2.64 6.47 6.47 2.64 0.67 0.29 0.67 2.64 7.54 2.79 0.66 0.27 0.65 2.79 7.54 7,54 2.79 0.66 0.28 0.66 2.79 1.93 1.30 0.57 0.22 0.57 1.30 t.93 1.93 1.30 0.57 0.22 0.57 1.30 1 0.63 0.46 0.54 0.43 0.54 0.46 0.63 0.63 0.46 0.54 0.43 0.55 0.46 1 0.23 0.35 0,71 0.99 0.71 0.36 0.24 0.24 0.36 0.71 0.99 0.71 0.36 0.20 0.50 2.20 4.02 2.20 0.50 0.21 0.21 0.50 2.20 4.02 2.20 0.50 0.15 0.69 7.49 10.86 7.49 0.69 0.16 0.16 0.69 7.49 10.86 7.49 0.69 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Calculation Grid: A. h-ary Grid (Site) (Page 6) I LNA Horizontal Illuminance Calculation Grid 265.00 275.00 285.00 295.00 305.00 315.00 85.00 0.65 0.67 0.44 0.72 1.52 6.30 75.00 2.70 2.71 1.31 0.68 0.71 1.39 65.00 6.48 6.48 2.68 0.76 0.37 0.33 55.00 7.55 7.55 2.80 0.68 0.24 0.12 45.00 1.93 1.94 1.31 0.58 0.19 0.12 35.00 0.64 0.04 Q.48 0.57 0.38 0.25 25.00 0.25 0.26 0.41 0.82 1.06 0.70 15.00 0.21 0.23 0.60 2.86 4.71 2.12 5.00 0.16 0.17 0.88 9.22 11.94 6.12 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1996 Lighting Technologies, Inc . Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com Plan View ( t—r-m �) Scale: 1 "=40' IDX Parking, Garage Shelbume Road at IDX Drive LM Light\Space\Design South Burlington, VT 11/3/99 Prepared for: Kessel-Duff Corporation Proiect No.: K-D #9914 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighbng-technologies.com LM IDX Parking Garage Shelburne Road and IDX Drive, South Burlington, VT Light\Space\Design Site Plan View T "PT ) Scale: 1 "=40' South Burlington, VT 1113199 1 Prepared for: Kessel-Duff Corporation I Proiect No.: Kessel-Duff #9914 1 Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technotogies.com 9KESSEWDUFF CORPORATION k , DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT Octabtr 20, 1999 Mr. Raymoad Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington Vernsont 05403 Re: IDX campus expansion Dear Ray: As a follow up to our conversation of last week, I have teviewed the scope of the first }phase of construction and compared it to the total project for, the purpose of establishing the phase 1 itupact fees. The square Footage of the project is 260,164 square feet. Phase l consists of It 6,000 square feet and represents 45% of the total project. The sewer impact fee for the total project is S 110,000.00, and the traffic impact fee is $ 64,500,00 Bssed on the above, I request the phase I sewer mid traffic impact fees be established at $ 49,500.00 and 3 29025.00 respectively. Prior to having IDX issue these checks, I will contact you and verify your approval of this proposal, Thank You Sincerely, Pzesidco,; /' cc: W. Michellc Russo, IDX Systems Corporation 30 KIMBALL AVENUE, SUITE 101 • SG. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 802) 862-7600 FAQ(: V2j 862-1932 • Website: vwwn,.kaseelduif.00m . � TM 9V HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTIONS November 4, 1999 Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Systems Corporation Transportation Demand Management Plan Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed, please find our progress report on the Transportation Demand Management Plan. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me on 864-1758 x 4018. Sincerely, L nne A. Berry Administrative Assistant to Michelle Russo Manager, Facilities & Administration Enclosure 1400 Shelburne Road I P.O. Box 1070 1 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 1 [8021 862-1022 1 www.idx.com 04/28/99 IYED 16:04 FAX 206 623 150 I 17Fr . whxTM go HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SOLUTION S April27, 1991) Mr. Peter Plumeau Chinenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization 100 Dorset Street, Suite 22 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Peter: I wanted to take a moment to reiterate IDX's interest in being an active participant in the Shelburne Road Traffic Management Association. During our last conversation, you provided suggestions for programs IDX she uld consider implementing in an effort to manage our own traffic. At present, we are working on a study th.it we hope will provide insight regarding our employees' travel patterns and willingness to participate in various programs. However, though IDX will be the largest employer on the Shelburne Road corridor, our employee programs are only a part of the solution. We are in full support of a TMA for Shelburne Road. I will be happy to commit some of my time and/or that of someone on my staff to parti,-ipate in meetings with other Shelburne Road employers. Unfortunately, we cannot offer to assist in organizing the TMA or in conducting meetings. Our department does not have the necessary staff or expertise to provide those services. We will look to you and your staff for leadership in launching this p -ojcct. We would be willing, with advance notice, to offer our facilities for group meetings. i have attached a copy of a status report on our Traffic Demand Management flan for your review and comment. If you have experience with some creative solutions that have help(-d other companies, we would appreciate the suggestions. 1 look forward to working with you. Please call ntc if you have questions or if I can be of assistance as you go forward with this project. Sincerely, Michelle Russ / Manager, Adfni �istration 11131 Enc. Cc: Dale Rocheleau, Downs, Rachlin & Martin Carole Gartzke, IDX 10002 1001 Fourth Avenue Plaza I Suite 1500 1 Seattle, WA 981S4-1144 1 (2061 622-9SS8 I www.idx.com 04,'28/99 VYE i 16:04 FAX 206 623 19150 I 17Fr ' 4003 I / ■wx.w ; H E A l T N C 4 p E I N F O R M A T I O N SOLUTIONS Traffic Demand ManaCement Plan Status Report April 27, 1999 As part of our Act 250 permit process, IDX is evaluating appropriate policies rind procedures that will assist to managing traffic flow from our site at peak traffic hours. Several sug;;estions Have been provided by Peter Pluntcau from the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization and Jeanette Berry from the Chittenden County Transportation Authority. Listed below arc programs that IDX feels confident in committing to given the information we currently have on hand. Flexible Arrival and Departure times will be encouraged for all employees. Ti is policy will be administered m at the manager level and will only require notification or requests from employees to their respective managers. Preferential Parking for Car Poolcrs We do have some employees participatin; in car pools at present. (Car Pools are addressed later in this report.) IDX will post signs restricting general parking at preferred locations so that those spaces are available for employees willing to participate. Bike Racks Locker Rooms & Showers. Our interior design includes large faci ities for anyone wishing to bike, run or walk to and from work. We will distribute information for the Vermont Ride Share Pro ram to every Vermont employee. In addition to the above, we have initiated an electronic questionnaire that will lie sent to all employees to help us understand their willingness to change their commute habits. A copy of the first draft of the questionnaire is attached. Jeanette Berry will be assisting us with the evaluation of the completed questionnaires. Our intent is to have some success with the following programs. Use of public transportation with company -paid bus passes. IDX pays for publi•: transportation in many other cities. CCTA has committed to altering bus routes to make this service ea.;y for our staff to use. Use of Car Pools to a much greater extent than we are currently experiencing Zvi th the assistance from- CCTA's Guaranteed Ride Home Program and Ride Matchinc Program. Use or the Commuter Rail "'11cn the Slate determines it will be huilt. I rec Coffee -Breakfast for en1 lovices arrivine at our calcicria before S:00AM. V,e -ill be evaluatin_ the arfordability of tills program. 1D\ is ;also t cry• w filling to commit to aclix•c participaIloll in l raf(ic \1�na ctllcut Association Cor Ili lburne lZtlad \\'c have nlel with Peter Plumeau from the 1�11'O on a couple o occasions, and will be iuukin_ 10 the AIK) for leadership and expertise in this area. 1001 Fourth Avenue plaza I Suite 750o I Suatlle. WA 95154-1144 1 12061 622.9558 1 IvwvvJdx.com 04/'28/99 WED 16:04 FAX 206 623 ig50 I 17Fr IDX EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY IDX and the Vermont Rideshare Program are evaluating issues that impact your daily commute. As you complete this survey, please add any additional information you feel may be important. 1. What town do you live in? 2. What major intersection, landmark is closest to your home? 3. What is the round trip distance of your daily commute? 4. What is your estimated daily cost to commute? 5. What time do you usually arrive at work? am/pm 6. What time do you usually leave work? am/pm 7. Which days do you usually commute to work? Monday - Friday except Saturday Sunday 8. Compared to the various activities you conduct during the day, how stressful do you find your commute to work? (check one) More stressful than most activities — About as stressful as most activities Less stressfully than most activities 9. What are the most stressfully aspects of your commute? (check fill that apply) _ Distance _Expense Road Conditions _ Auto dependability _ Weather _Traffic _Environmental degradat on Other 10. How many days per week do you usually travel to work using each of the modes listed below? NOTE: Driving with a spouse is considered a carpool. Drive alone _ days a week = _ Carpool _days a week _ number of people _ Bus _ Walk — Bicycle _ Get dropped off 11. How many times a week do you make stops for the following reasons on your way to or from work? — Drop off/pick up children at school/childcare _ Pick up/drop of carpooler Errands/personal services shopping _ Eat _ Exercise Other (describe) 12. Do you avoid Shelburne road during peak hours? (7:00 - 9:OOam zind 3:30 - 5:30pm) 0 4/2 8/99 WED 16:05 FAX 206 623 '1950 I 17Fr WJuua Yes No Sometimes 13. What type of work do you normally do? _ Secretarial/Clerical Profess iona I/Tech n icaI _ Sales/Service _Production/Crafts _ Manager/Administrator Other: 14. What would encourage you to vanpool or carpool to work? Plea:;e answer even if you are presently ridesharing. (check all that apply) — My commitment to energy and environmental conservation — A guaranteed ride home in an emergency Extend life of my vehicle Company and conversation during my commute _ Increased personal time in my daily life Relief from daily driving — Other IS. Are you interested in Vanpooling to IDX? _Yes No Are you interested in Ridesharing to IDX? _Yes No 16. How long have you worked at IDX? _Years _Months 17. Are you _Male _Female Married/Partnered _Parent of dependent children Unmarried 18. Would you use the Commuter Rail if service from the train to IDX ,vas provided? Why or why not? 19. Would you like to receive additional information about the Vermon: Rideshare Program? Name Address City Zip 20. Please add any additional comments about your commute that yoti think may be of intere-st to the Vermont Rideshare Program or to IDX. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 Ms. Pariseau then directed the attention of the Commission to a letter from Douglas Reilly. Ms Barone read the letter in which Mr. Reilly said he was disturbed by the "urban flavor" of the project, the acute angles of access, and drainage problems. He also felt the proposal was inappropriate because of the single family nature of the area. He was also concerned that the project destroys the last piece of open space in the area. He felt it should be in the City Center. Mr. Dinklage said he wanted to be sensitive to how the area was developed and said he would personally prefer the density to be calculated on the smaller area. He felt 21 units was a bit high. Mr. Beaudin wanted to see a more definitive plan for dealing with drainage. He felt that infiltration shouldn't be the only way to get rid of water. Mr. Nedde said the design is not complete yet. Ms. Wright stressed that they don't want water problems either which is why they have hired the best engineer. Ms. Wright noted that the density is what helps keep the project "affordable." She noted it will cost a lot to address the drainage problem. Mr. Beaudin said he had no problem with the density. Mr. Farley agreed as it is within what is allowable. Mr. Pariseau asked if tenants are screened. Ms. Wright said they are screened very carefully. Mr. Pariseau asked how many people there would be per unit. Ms. Wright said they are 2 bedroom units, so there would be a maximum of 4 people. Mr. Dinklage encouraged neighbors to continue to meet with the developer to address concerns. Mr. Burgess rejoined the Commission. 4. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of a 384,400 sq. ft. general office use facility and a 679 space parking structure, 1400 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Caulo began with a brief overview of the property. It is approximately 16.9 acres from 3 parcels of land. A 4th parcel is not part of this application. Mr. Caulo then reviewed changes since preliminary plat: a) parking structure: the building is more rectangular. Vehicles 5 PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 would enter off Green Mountain Dr. and circulate down through the building. There will be 3 stairwells with no parking spaces more than 200 ft. from a stairwell. A few parking spaces were picked up with a total now of 1425. All required lighting information has been submitted and meets requirements. b) buildings elevations: They tried to get back to the simplicity of the existing buildings with strip windows. The coloring will be the same as the existing building at the top levels. c) storm water: they worked with Heindel & Noyes on storm water retention. The property is now designed to a 25-year storm event. This will be improved on by increasing retention capability. d) setbacks: some setbacks have been cleaned up. They worked with GMP with regard to placement of additional street fixtures. Mr. Caulo noted they had met with the Fire Chief today, and he is comfortable with the plan. Additional traffic information has been submitted. They have been working with VAOT. There will be a left turn lane into IDX Drive. VAOT is still working on signal timing. Mr. Dinklage said the traffic numbers are scary. Mr. Kalisky acknowledged that overall traffic gets a little worse. Mr. Dinklage said that when the Commission sees something that has such serious projections as these, the Commission has to ask very serious questions. He felt that the ability to adjust signals for optimum flow may not work out as the applicant plans. Mr. Kaliski said that a lot of the problems will be eliminated with the Shelburne Rd. project. Mr. Dinklage noted that if the Shelburne Rd. improvements are not completed when IDX has 300 more employees, it will be a disaster. He wanted some indication that IDX would do something to address those improvements at that time. Mr. Kalisky said the biggest problems can't go away without changing the corridor signal timing. This is especially true at Queen City Park Rd. The cycle length will have to be lengthened from 80 to about 90 seconds. Mr. Kalisky added that VAOT has committed that it will push this segment of the project through if the rest of the project gets held up in court. Mr. Farley asked if the only entrance/exit to the garage on Green Mountain Dr. Mr. Caulo said no. At the lower level, one can cycle 11 PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 out to the rear of the existing building. Mr. Loyer asked about noise from generators on Saturday mornings and also about lights. He is an abutting neighbor. Mr. Caulo said they will use cut-off fixtures, more downcasting. They are within the city's foot candle limit. He also felt they can cycle the generators at a more convenient time than Saturday mornings. Mr. Weith said the additional generator needs to be shown on the plan. Ms Barone moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 21,200 sq ft general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 sq ft addition and a 20,476 sq. ft. connector to an existing 124,208 sg ft general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three lots into one lot, as depicted on a 19-page set of plans, page three entitled "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded i n the South Burling ton land records. 3 Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4 In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineers "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5. Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the Zoning Regulations, the Plannino Commission modifies the front vard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 6. Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front yard property line. 7 Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space of 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 sq. ft. and excludes the 20,476 sq. ft. building connector/cafeteria space. 8 Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9 Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning_ Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10 The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 25,800 qpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11 For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12 The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording. a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen land- scaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Dr. c) The site plan (sheet SP1) shall be revised to change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. e) The plans shall be revised to show all ground mounted generators/cooling equipment/HVAC equipment. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide liahtin information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change in lighting shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. 16. In order to make a determination that the project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the followin a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left - turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 78,000 sq. ft. of office space. Said improvements shall be con- structed in accordance with the Shelburne Rd. widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/2/99. For a period of five years starting 10/1/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a vear) Droaress reports exDlainina the status of said TDM plan. 17. The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31,2002. Any phase which has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1999 19 The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP1, SP2, SP31 and L 1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital in- formation shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning. Mr. Dinklage seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Hart, Meath & The Renshaw Trust to: 1) raze a 147 seat standard restaurant, and 2) construct a 10,059 sq. ft. retail store with drive-thru service, 1653 Williston Rd. The applicant indicated they will build a store to be leased by Kinney Drug. They will eliminate the easterly access to the site. Circulation will be mostly counterclockwise around the property. The route of storm water drainage was also shown. They have added a handicapped parking space as requested by staff. Landscaping: yews will be added along the parking lot and arborvitae will be added to screen the dumpster. The back area of the property is already wooded. There will be 20-foot light poles and also recessed canopy lights above the sidewalk outside the building. There will also be a sidewalk from Williston Rd. to the building. The project meets all density requirements. Traffic for the project exceeds the limit by 2.5 trip ends. The applicant felt this was a "trade-off" for closing the curb cut. Mr. Weith suggested adding one more ash tree in front of the building, 3-3.5 caliper. Other than that, he felt the landscaping was OK. Members agreed. No other issues were raised. Ms Barone moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Hart, Meath & Renshaw Trust to: 1) raze a 147 seat standard restaurant, and 2) construct a 10,059 sq. ft retail store with drive -through service, 1653 Williston Rd, as depicted on a 10 Memorandum - Planning January 26, 1999 agenda items January 22, 1999 4) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION - FINAL PLAT This project consists of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot. The 124,208 square feet building was approved on 12/15/87. Several minor site modifications have been made since 1987. This application will be treated as a planned unit development. The preliminary plat was approved on 12/8/98 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the north by IDX Drive, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the south by an auto dealership. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided by a 32 foot and 45 foot curb cut on IDX Drive and a 24 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. The applicant proposes to: 1) eliminate the Shelburne Road curb cut, 2) extend IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive, and 3) construct two (2) new 24 foot curb cuts on Green Mountain Drive. Circulation on the site is adequate. TqX Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 23.9% (maximum owed is 30% and includes parking garage). Overall coverage is 66.2% (maximum allowe is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 0%, along IDX Drive is 31.8%, an along Green Mountain Drive is 21.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Front yard coverage along n Drive is proposed to be exceeded. The Planning Commission allowed this coverage to be exceeded under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations as part of the preliminary plat approval. The existing building and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Green Mountain Drive. The proposed setback is 32 feet. The applicant is seeking a waiver from the front setback requirement as provided under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. Staff does not see a 3 Memorandum - Planning January 26, 1999 agenda items January 22, 1999 problem with granting this waiver. A 12 foot setback was approved as part of the preliminary plat approval. Parking: A total of 1538 spaces are required and 1425 spaces are provided including 26 handicapped spaces. This represents a 113 space or 7.3% shortfall. The Commission, as part of preliminary plat approval, agreed to base parking calculation on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and exclude the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. The total parking required would be 1456 spaces which would result in a 31 space or 2.1% space shortfall. Parking_ structure: The proposed parking structure is in substantial compliance with the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures." The parking layout within the structure has been revised since preliminary plat approval such that the maximum distance between parking spaces and nearest exit stairwell is less than 200 feet. The applicant has not provided sufficient lighting information within the parking structure to determine compliance with the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. This was a requirement of preliminary plat condition #17. The guidelines require that two (2) elevators be provided. The applicant indicated that the State will not require elevators because this is a private parking structure. The Planning Commission agreed to not require elevators. Landscaping_ The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $257,950 which is being met. Proposed plantings include: Red Maple, Green Ash, Crabapple, Honeylocust, Sugar Maple, Birch, Pin Oak, Shadblow, Spruce, Pine, Viburnum, Juniper, and Wintercreeper. Landscaping plan should be revised to provide street trees on the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Additional evergreen landscaping should be provided around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. Preliminary plat condition # 13b required that parking be shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle and parking and the proposed r.o.w. (at the northwest corner of the site) and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. This condition has been met. Building height: Section 25.113(a) of the zoning regulations limits the height of a flat roof structure to 35 feet. The proposed addition will have a height of 68 feet from the average pre -construction grade. This is 33 feet greater than permitted. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non-residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: 4 Memorandum - Planning January 26, 1999 agenda items January 22, 1999 (i)) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located. (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. Preliminary plat stipulation #9 granted the height waiver. Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires additional front, side and rear setbacks for taller structures. The proposed addition will meet the additional setback requirements. Information on the height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level was provided. This height is 32 feet. No height waiver is necessary. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District BBWZ This property is located in the BBW District. Under Section 23.20 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. The final plat plans incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation requested is 25,800 gpd (this includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. Preliminary plat stipulation #10 requires that no Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. Traffic: Condition #12 of the preliminary plat approval required the applicant to do the following prior to final plat. This information has not yet been submitted. It should be available for Tuesday's meeting a) Conduct a signal timing/synchronization analysis for the corridor. In addition, a queue length analysis shall be prepared. Memorandum - Planning January 26, 1999 agenda items January 22, 1999 b) Prepare a plan for the recommended southbound left -turn lane at IDX Drive. c) Amend the traffic impact analysis to include the impact of the Shelburne Road widening project south of IDX Drive. d) Submit a proposal for developing and implementing a transportation demand program (e.g., flex -time, van pool, bus passes, etc.). e) Conduct a LOS analysis for the Shelburne Road/Imperial Drive intersection. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $110,000. Dumpsters: The dumpsters will be located inside the building. Lighting: Proposed exterior lighting consists of the following: — twelve (12) 100 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 43" bollards. — nine (9) 27 watt flourescent lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. — thirteen (13) 100 watt halogen stake -mounted uplights. — three (3) 100 watt halogen surface -mounted uplights. — forty-four (44) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 20 foot poles with downcasting shielded fixtures. — eleven (11) fountain lights. Existing exterior lights consist of the following: — nine (9) 250 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures. A point by point lighting plan was submitted which indicates that the average illumination on the site is 1.4 to 1.6 foot candles. This meets the City's lighting standards. Sidewalk: The applicant should construct a sidewalk along their frontage on Green Mountain Drive. The sidewalk should be constructed as part of the street construction. Lot merger: A lot merger agreement, approved by the City Attorney, should be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans which merges lots A, B and the recently acquired lot #11 from Allson Partnership. 6 Memorandum - Planning January 26, 1999 agenda items January 22, 1999 Phasing: This project will be constructed in three (3) main phases (see enclosed phasing plan). Phase I would begin in the summer of 1999 and consist of constructing the east wing of the main building including the connecting link and the extension of both IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. Phase II would begin in 2000 and involve constructing the parking structure. Phase III would begin in 2002 and would involve constructing the west wing of the main building. Staff recommends that this approval be conditioned on obtaining the zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Other: — the boundary plat should be revised to note that the "old" property lines are to be dissolved. — the "residential zone" on sheet SP1 should be noted as "R4 District." — pans do not comply with preliminary plat condition # 13 that requires the plan to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. — applicant has submitted evidence that these plans have been submitted to the City Water Department. 5) HART MEATH & THE RENSHAW TRUST - RETAIL, STORE - SITE PLAN This project consists of: 1) razing a 147 seat standard restaurant, and 2) constructing a 10,059 square foot retail store with drive -through service. This property located at 1653 Williston Road lies within the C 1 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the north by Williston Road, on the east by a medical office, and the west by a standard restaurant and residence, and on the south by undeveloped land. Access/circulation: Access is proposed to be provided by one (1) 28 foot curb cut on Williston Road. An existing curb cut at the easterly end of the property will be eliminated. The applicant should record a shared access agreement with the property to the west which would allow a future connection between the two (2) properties. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 12.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 58% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 25.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). 7 01/19/1999 09:20 8028640435 CHAMPLAIN WATER DIST PAGE 01 South Burlington Water Department 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802-864-4361 802-864-0435 Fax January 19, 1999 Mr. John Caulo Kessel/Duff; Corporation 57 Talcott Road Williston, Vermont 05494 RE: Act 250 Review, IDX Building, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Caulo: In response to your request as to the capability of the South Burlington water distribution system to supply water to the above referenced project we submit the following: 1. Your demand of 25,800 gallons per day for the above referenced project can be furnished by the South Burlington Water Department without restricting or encumbering its present users. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, SOUT N WATER DEPT. Brent J. Detmnlftu Superintendent CC: J. Fay D. Pratt C. Hafter Poet -it' Fax Note 7671 Date -9 �9► 7b Fr CoJDept Co. �. Photo M g Phone 1 • 7 Fa= e ,TAN— 1 S-99 MON 15 :SO TRU — � L_t— CONSULT I NG ENGRS P _ 0 1 01/1S/1G99 06:56 S028640435 January 15, 1999 F"*E 01 403 Queen City Park Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 C HAMPL.AIN WATER pIST Post -It" Fax Note Ucbni Bell ". wx IV Trudoll Consulting Engineers, Inc. �101°" Phono N 2 P.O. BOX3O Fax N _ Fax N WltiiUM, Vermont 05495 Dcar Debra ti •. Concerning oitr preliminary plan review of the IDX water main extension project # 9805152,1 offer the fbUowing comments. 1. Follows i this letter, I will forward some direction as to the location of the proposed 8" tap on lbume Road per our meeting here at Champlain Water District. ed Are South Burlington Water Department's typical hydrant and main valve details that to be added to this plan. 1 on for the connection of the 8" main off frorn Shelburne Road will rived to be filled ! ` s « •i. F z';; to this work, being performed. �watd"'mein improvements that will be malt in the City right of way or proposed easements be tumod over to the South Burlington Water Department, will need to be inspected by our prior to any back filling. e extim.sion of the water main from IDX Drive, cross country to Green Mount, in Drive, skuld bdplaced in a 25' permanent easement and deeded over to the South Burlington Water Depart at it at the end of the one year warranty period. 6. Due to t6 relocation of the 12" main, the two existing hydrants along the frontage of the IDX property will be relocated as well. An additional hydrant should be placed somewhere near the wtstck'Alde of the parking garage. 1. The existing 8" servlce that is to be abandoned off from Shclbume Road should be shown on the plan where it crosses IDX property. Pleaaa call me if you have any further questions on this matter. SOUTH BURL GTO WATER DEPT, Sincerely, Braot j. Deti�gfibau 'i� Suposltttendcn� . �; � yg`,. v�tf �I { •��. �kujyr{ +r ° _..., I.. ,,•.. � �, � thy= �:,. CAT Less than 1 yr old. beautiful all black female cat, very very affection- ate, exceptional feline! 893-1646. DOG Free to good home, beautiful Shepherd/Gol- den mix. 3 years old, neutered male, looking for adult home, no small children, great exercise partner & companion. 878-1588. DOG -FREE To a good home only. Beagle mix. Neutered male. 3 years old. Call 453-4025. EXTERIOR DOOR Solid wood with 3 glass panels. Free. Call 802- 865-9321 & leave name & number. FREE 16" LOG LENGTH PINE AND SPRUCE! You pick up! Call 655-7593. FREE CAT Patches. 8 yr. old fixed male. Lap cat needs good home. Call Kim 863-5702. FREE CAT to good home, 1 yr old. Spayed female, all shots, prey long haired. Very affec- tionate, good with chil- dren and dogs. Accesso- ries included. 865-1284 MANGLEIRON Needs motor. 372-3211. ROTTWEILLER 4 yr old, spayed female, good with people, needs fenced -in yard and male owner, Please call 872- 8375. SEWING MACHINE Old Singer Electric, with cabinet. Works. You pick up. Call 878-8549 eves. STEREO CONSOLE CABINET mahogany, excellent condition. Call 802-872-0626. STILL NEED HELP FREE LEASE "Kiz- zmee", 10 yr old, 16H, And/TB X needs tempo- rary home with rider knowledgable in dress- age. Owner has injury and cannot work him or provide care, Call Juli- eann 865-6058. TWIN BED -& FRAME good condition, call 660- 3835. LOST & FOUND 3 A LOST OR FOUND PET? Petfinders. 1-800-666-5678. www.petclub.org, FOUND CAMERA on 1/4/99. Call to de- scribe 865-9516. FOUND CAT On Jan. 4 on Cochran Rd., Rich- mond. Silver tipped black Tiger. Short haired, neu- tered male adult. Beauti- ful cat, very affectionate. No collar or tags. Look- ing for owner or good home. If the cat is yours, or you are interested in adopting him. please call 434-4472. FOUND CHILD'S TOY Outside the Nickelodean Theater. Sat. night Jan. 2. 899-5642. FOUND DOO Female beagle in Mont- gomery. Call Sue at 326- 4337. W-_FOUND DOG fication. Please call V� 658-1677. LOST CD C black leather ca lith CDs in it. Lost near VT Pub & Brewery on New Year's Eve. Call 802 $72-3435. LOST LAB BORDER COLLIE MIX All black with a white spot under chin. No collar. Lost on Jan. 2 in the North End of Bur- lington. 862-6534. GARAGE SALES 4 COLCHESTER Upright freezer, Honda lawn- mower, full & single beds, wooden full bed frame, dehumidifier, 21/2 cords seasoned wood, lamps, chairs & more. Stop by 33 Camp Kiniya Rd., Sat 9-3PM. W ILLI STON Got the winter blues and you need to get out. Come to our garage sale you'll find something no doubt. Sat. & Sun. 9-5. 71 Shunpike Rd., next to F.E. Hart Fence. ADOPT Loving Ildless couple. Will gi a your newborn a life f love & happiness, fina cial secu- rity & educ ion. Ex- penses paid. L al. Confi- dential. Call a ime, toll free -Tom & Clau is 1-877-798-60 ADOPTION -,, . A beautiful life awaits your baby in our warm country home. Loving, happily married. Educa- ted and financially secure couple promise lots of love, laughter and brigght future for your baby. Ex- penses paid. Call Jodi collect at 603-228-1614 from 8:30am-5pm. adoption LOVING COUPLE Wishes more than any- thing to provide family, security & bright future for infant. Expenses Paid. Call Joanie & Kevin (800) 960-8377. CARIBBEAN VACA- TIONS 2 vacation pack- ages to Caribbean desti- nations. 5 days, 4 nights, $650. All inclusive, 3 days, 2 nights, $600. Air- fare not included. No ex- piration date. Call 658- 7609, leave message. DAYTONA 500 TICKETS & NAPA 300 TICKETS 2/14/99 and 2/13/99. Tower seats for both races, row 43. $135 each and $70 each. 849-6978. ADOPTION HAPPY COUPLE WOULD LOVE to be- come a family. We can give your baby love, se- curity, ' a bright future. Expenses paid. Sandy & Tim. (800) 895-7439. HOCKEY TICKETS-(4) Pittsburgh vs Montreal. Jan. 31 at 2pm. After- noon game. Tickets $22.50 each.985-5032. Singles Connection Single Adults Network Professional & Intelliggant Newsletter 800-775-3090 TRAVEL TO HAWAIII Round trip airline tickets for two, $500 Two sets available, call for details. GREAT DEAL! Cell 802- oiuuers are reminded that "Minority Business Enterprise", "Women's Business Enterprise" does apply to the WORK. The CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be examined at the follow- ing locations: Works in Progress, F.W. Dodge in Burlington, VT Copies of the CON- TRACT DOCUMENTS may be obtained at the office of Harrington Engineering, Inc. located at North Pomfret, Vermont upon payment of $50.00 for each set, nonrefundable. December 19 & 26, 1998 January 2 & 9, 1999 ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting of the Granite Mutual Insur- ance Company will be held in the home office of said company in the City of Montpelier, Vermont on Tuesday, February 9, 1999 at ten o'clock a.m. for the purpose of electing officers for the ensuing year and the transaction of any other come before Richard N. Bland, Secretary Onuary 9,16 & 23, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlingtor Planning Commissior will hold a public hearinc at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat applica- tion of BDP Realty Asso- ciates for a planned unit development consisting of a 384,400 square foot general office use facility and a 679 space parking structure, 1400 Shel- burne Road. 2) Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit develop- ment consisting of 54,- 480 square feet of shopP- ping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7,000 square foot retail build- ing along Market Street and construction of streetscape improve- ments along Market Street. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission January 9, 1999 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burling- ton Zoning Board of Ad)'ustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Munick Pal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Mondayy January 25, 1999 at 7:0t) P.M. to consider the I011owinp: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer January 9, 1999 State of Vermont \Agency of Transportation Di trict Maintenance Services Th Vermont Agency of Tra sportation will retain the services of sever I construction firms t perform a variety of sery es for Districts locate throughout the state. he types of work to be performed include but are not limited to the following categories: A. Bridge Painting and/or Rehabilitation (involves rental of bridge painting/ repair equipment), B. Paving and/or Surface Treatments (involves rental of pavers, 8 ton or heavier rollers, and emul- sion distributor trucks, etc.), C. Guard Rail in- stallation (involves rental of post drivers), D. Pave- ment Marking (involves rental of pavement mark- ing equipment) and G. Drainage System Cleaning. The Agency will send Request for Proposals to interested parties. If your firm is interested in being considered for this work. Please contact Samantha Kelley, Office of Contract Administra- tion at (802) 828-2641. These proposals are due no later than 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, January 27, 1999. January 9 & 13, 1999 cm f►eployment TO RESPOND TO A FREE PRESS BOX NUMBER Send to: Burlington Free Press P.O. Box 10 tail use structure and a residential structure and replace with a 45' square foot one (1) s structure located wit. twenty (20) feet of the Shelburne Road front yard, . thirty (30) feet of Proctor Avenue's front yard and fifty-five (55) feet of the required rear Msetback, located at -400 Shelburne Road. #5) Appeal of Bret & Diana Kernoff seeking approval from Section ANT 12.201 Taverns and night Local ASSISTSSISTmanufeNT' N of clubs of the South Bur- electronics for the ino- lington Zoning Regula- lion picture and virtual Mo- tions. Request is for per- reality industries needs mission to convert an existing teen dance club help in a variety of office tasks including �ecep- into a tavern/night club tion, secretarial, word with a seating capacity of processing, and market - 42 and a maximum occu- ing mailings. Send re- pancy of 100 people, (lot sume to: Ascension size 11,at 1 square feet) Technology Corp., Attn: located at 1203 Williston Sue, PO Box 527, Road. Burlington, VT 05402. ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY Dynamic CPA & consult- ing firm seeks an el)try- level administrativesec- retary w/ previous a o- sure to busy office vi- ronment, prefer, ly professional, & skill in office systems. The per- son we are looking )for must be reliable, er- getic, eager to learn, ,& looking to further their career w/ our organiza- tion. This position will in- volve word processing, reception, technical ap- plications, filing & direct contact w/ clients & staff. Please mail resume to: Diana Jones, Dayman, Lurie & Goldsbury, PO Box 1542, BurlinRCg, - ton, VT 05402, or fax (802) 864-6068. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/REGIS- TRAR School requires a well organized, self-mc111- vated person to fill As position in the St. AlbsAs area. Must possetss good oral and writteqq, communication skills!6 Please call David Astrof at 1-800-363-0058. individual willing to learn and do all functions of our accounting/adninis- )trative department. SSoome of these functions. in- clude: A/P, A/R, G/L, bill- Ing, shipping, receiving and answering phones. On site daycare is aii- able for this positio A 4 year degree is re ed. Send letter and r me to: VIP, Inc., 500 er- tower Circle, Colc ter,. VT 05446. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/ SECRETARY Small professional serv- ices company seeks team member to provide administrative and secre- tarial services. Windows 95, advanced WordPer- fect a plus. Duties: tele- phones, billing, docu- ment preparation, mailings. Competitive compensation. Reply to: Personnel, PO Box 1660, Williston, VT 05495. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Busy office. Excel, Word experience required. Ad- vancement possible. Fax resume to 865-2861. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Must be organized, detail oriented, able to work in fast paced envi- ronment. computer friendly. Great with cus- tomer service. Good benefits. Good People. Resumes to Total Resto- ration, 7 Ewingg Place, Essex, VT 05452. or fax to 872-5947 AIRPORT National Car Rental is hiring Rental & Service Agents, $7-$8/ hr. Apply any time at Nations airport counter. We are in need of a motivated career minded individual to join our new & used auto sales team. Excellent training & wage benefit package to a sin- cere candidate. Contact Joe or Dan for appoint- ment. 524-9737 AUTOMOTIVE TECHNICIAN New car dealership seeks individual to join our 5 'Star Service Team'. Blue Cross/Blue Shield, profit sharing plan. Apply at: Goss Dodge 1485 Shelburne Rd So Burlington AUTOMOTIVE TECHNICIAN Come to work for one of the areas leading sport utility vehicle deal- ers. Willie Racine's Inc. is seeking a full time ex- perienced Technician. Chrysler experience and ASE certification are big Pluses. We offer a com- prehensive benefits package, including den- tal, vacation and un- iforms. Neat appearance and clean VT drivers li- cense are required. Please do not apply in person. Please call Eileen Hughes Nooney for an appointment at 802-863-1141. AUTO SALES MANAGER General Sales Manager, Northern VT. Multi -fran- chise new car dealership, wants a highly motivated professional to lead our .Sales ,Department. If you can meet the challenge, and have the leadership skills required, please send your resume in confidence to Free Press Box # 152. AUTO TECHNICIAN COME JOIN THE TEAM Denecker Chevrolet is continuing to grow and we are looking for a qualified individual to help us take care of our customers service needs. We can offer the qualified candidate the following: excellent work environment, weekends with your family, paid va- cation, full benefits, un- iforms, training & top pay in your field. Can you of- fer honesty, high energy, pride in your craft, 2 yrs experience, your own tools & a desire to learn? If this sounds like you, please call Jeff Smith 1-800-675-2436 for a confidential interview. BAKER A.M. baker, w/ exper. making croissants, muffins & cookies. Apply at Mirabeiles after Jan. 10. BAKER Breads/pastry & desserts. Positive, hard- working environment. ot- ter Creek Bakery, Mid- dlebury. Fax resume: 802-462-2760. BILLING ASSISTANT coo rest dev pros dev( duti( cller nes; she( coui and grou start wk: cont on ft $10. benE cant Ass( Busi or rf strat edge plam merit mark skills comr and It appli Word Acce wide) tend( Gram octal valid CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 16, 1999 Jim Boyd, District Coordinator District 4 Environmental Commission I I I West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: IDX Expansion Project, South Burlington Application #4C0391-9 Dear Mr. Boyd: The City of South Burlington has reviewed the proposed expansion of IDX headquarters at 1400 and 1500 Shelburne Road, to include an additional 240,000 square foot, six -story office building, on -site parking of 1,425 cars, including a 679- car parking deck, the purchase and renovation of a 63,000 square foot office building and land from Green Mountain Power Corporation, the extension of IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive, the elimination of the existing Route 7 curb cut, and with the construction of a 20,500 square foot two-story building containing a new reception area, media center, kitchen and employee dining hall linking the existing office building to the proposed office building. The proposed project is in conformance with the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan, adopted May 20, 1996. According to the Future Land Use Map (Map 6), the IDX campus is located in a Commercial Center. The IDX project conforms to the definition of Commercial Center, located on page 6 of the Comprehensive Plan: "These areas generally follow the Shelburne Road and Williston Road Corridors. These areas are intended to consist predominately of commercial uses, however, residential and industrial can be mixed throughout the area. These centers are generally already developed with commercial establishments. Therefore, growth will occur primarily as infill or conversion development. The City encourages mixed -use development in these areas (e.g., mixed residential/commercial or mixed retail/office/restaurants) to encourage pedestrian movements, use of public transportation services, and shared parking opportunities. These areas are intended to meet both local and regional shopping and employment needs." Jim Boyd, District Coordinator March 16, 1999 Page 2 In addition, the IDX Expansion Project conforms to the City of South Burlington Capital Budget and Program, adopted October 4, 1993. As a result of this Program, the project will contribute approximately $100,000 in impact fees to offset the impacts of the project on municipal infrastructure owned and operated by the City of South Burlington. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sinc rely, 1 k �/ Joe eith, Director Plan ing and Zoning JW/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 25, 1999 John Caulo Kessel, Duff Corporation P.0. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1.100 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. (aulo: Enclosed is a copy of the January 26, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plan be recorded in the land records within 90 days (5110199). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe Vith, Director Planikng & Zoning JW/mcp I Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERIVIONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 18, 1999 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on January 26, 1999 (effective 2/9/99). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (5/10/99). If you have any questions, please give me a call. JqqWeith, Director PjVnning and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl d' }I` DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC A T T 0 R N E Y s A T L A W COURTHOUSE PLAZA • 199 MAIN STREET • PO BOX 190 • BURLINGTON •VERMONT 05402 0190 +1 802 863 2375 • FAX +1 802 862 7512 July 29, 1999 Jim Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4CO391-9 Re: Grading easement on property owned by the Allson Partnership Dear Jim: Attached please find an original and four copies of a letter from Brad Carter of Kessel/Duff Corporation addressing the issue of the grading easement on the property owned by the Alison Partnership. As the letter indicates, in the event that the grading easement is never put into place, IDX's backup plan is to construct a retaining wall at the south side of the IDX Driveway. Construction of the wall will not affect the geometry of the driveway, but will eliminate the need to change the existing grades on the Alison Partnership property. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dale A. Rocheleau Enclosure cc_ Parties on Certificate of Service BTV\136915.1 ST. JOHNSBURY VT BRATTLEBORO VT LITTLETON NH +1 802 748 8324 +1802 258 3070 +1 603 444 0216 m CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Dale Rocheleau, Attorney for BDP Realty Associates, delivered a copy of the foregoing document, in the matter of BDP Realty Associates, Land Use Application #4C0391-9, either by personal delivery or by certified U.S. mail, postage paid, this 29th day of July, 1999, to the following: BDP Realty Associates by Ronald Roberts c/o IDX Corporation 1500 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Kessel/Duff Corporation by Brad Carter, President P.O. Box 788 57 Talcott Road Williston, VT 05495 IDX Systems Corporation by Michelle Russo, Administration Manager 1400 Shelburne Road P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Downs Rachlin & Martin PLLC by Dale Rocheleau, Esq. 199 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Burlington, VT 05402-0190 City of South Burlington by Joe Weith, City Manager 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director 66 Pearl Street, P.O. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 m l Certificate of Service BDP Realty Associates IDX Expansion Project Page 2 Agency of Commerce and Community Development by Curt Carter, Development Program Coordinator National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-0501 Agency of Transportation by David Scott 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (Cover letter only) Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. (GBIQ by Frank Cioffi, President P.O. Box 786, 60 Main Street Burlington, VT 05402 Economic & Policy Resources, Inc. by Jeffrey Carr and Larry Copp 439 Essex Road P.O. Box 1660 Williston, VT 05495 Ken Kaliski Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River Jct., VT 05001-2313 Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 29`h day of July, 1999. Dale A. Rocheleau, Esq. KESSEL/DUFF CORPORATION ► ,DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT July 28, 1999 Mr. Jim Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4CO391-9 Grading easement at property owned by the Allson Partnership Abutting neighbor at South end of IDX site Dear Jim: At your request, we have researched the status of a grading easement at the South East corner of the project site As of today, BDP has not executed such an agreement with the Allson Partnership. I believe it is still the intent of BDP to pursue the easement. In the event that the easement is never put in place, our backup plan is to construct a retaining wall at the south side of the IDX driveway. Construction of the wall will not effect the geometry of the driveway, but will eliminate the need to change the existing grades on the Allson Partnership property. We have reviewed this alternate plan with IDX and they are in agreement with constructing the wall if an easement is not obtained. Please contact me directly with any further questions on this matter. Sincerely, Brad J. C e Presiden 30 KIMBALL AVENUE, SUITE 101 • SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 862-7600 FAX: (802) 862-1932 • Website: www.kesselduff.com O POR STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 May 7, 1999 Mr. Mark Sinclair Director/CLF-VT 15 East State St., Suite 4 Montpelier, VT 05602-3010 RE: IDX Trip Reduction Program Dear Mr. Sinclair: David J. Scott, P.E. Tel: (802) 828-2663 Fax: (802) 828-2437 E-Mail: Dscot @OT.State.VT.US Please forgive me for taking so long to respond to your April 6, 1999 letter. The Agency, like CLF, stands ready to assist the Chittenden County MPO and IDX, in their efforts to develop a trip reduction program for the Shelburne Road corridor. We believe the ideas outlined in your letter are very similar to the ones we have in mind. We do feel that any trip reduction program should target the corridor, not just one employer, to achieve maximum benefit. Thank you for your interest and willingness to participate. We feel this effort will need to involve a broad spectrum of public and private entities if it is to prove successful. Sincerely, David J. Scott, P.E. Director of Project Development DJS:djs c: Clay Poitras, AOT Planning Dale Rocheleau, Downs, Rachlin & Martin Michelle Russo, IDX Peter Plumeau, CCMPO Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. i : I i CLF Conservation Law Foundation April 6. 1999 Micque Glitman Acting Secretary Agency of Transportation 133 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05633 John Kassel Secretary. Agency of Natural 'Resources 103 S.. Main Street- Waterbury, Vermont 05671 Re: IDX Tri Reduction Pro am Dear Micque-and John: 05 C. J (kV i= ' >".G�� I write to ask you both to work with TDX Sion , develop an "employer trip reduction" program o reduce traffic. congestion, encourageto arkin the company to and.lower transportation casts. The IDX expansion proposal provides an excellentParking opportunity for state government and IDX to demonstrate how major Vermont c PP ty . use throuOMDanies can re gh adoption of trip reduction programs. Specifically, Cons ation Law Foundation ducd vehicle (CLF) suggests that your agencies invite IDX to explore implementation of a comprehensive reduction program at the South Burlington facility in the context of the state permpre a trip Processes. Such a program could serve as a Prototypeg their part to reduce Vermont's automobile dependency - Businesses other large employers in Vermont to do Businesses around the country are taking creative steps to reduce the automo ' generate. In. manbile traffic they y parts of the country, large employers like IDX have developed comprehensive transportation programs which increase employees options for getting to work. As a result, some firms have repot red reductions of up to 75 percent in the'number of employees who drive alone to work. CLF believes that major Vermont. businesses. should be encouraged s Act 25 other state permitting. processes to begin to set targets for reducing .the number of trips Om oand f e commute by driving alone. 'A good place.to start is with the IDX expansion proposal. p yes Your agencies are in a unique position to influence'IDX on this important transportation because of Your statutory roles in the pending Act 250 process and. because V mst issue indirect source air quality permit for IDX expansion. CLF would be glad to fac�il ao must an participate in any collaboration with IDX, the Chittenden County MpQa South Burlington and Your agencies involving design of a trip reduction ro recommending this concept directly to IDX: p By separate letter, CLF will. be IN! U�� E- fl, C ' 1999 iiie SECgl=ri TATION 15 East State St., Suite 4, Montpelier, Vermont 05602-3010 • (802) 223-5992.• Fax: 802 2 120 Tillson Avenue, Rockland, Maine 04841-3416 •.(207) 594-8107 -'Fax-(2071596-7706 ( ) 23-0060 . Web: www,clf.org 62 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1016 • (617) 350-0990 • Fax: (617) 350-4030 pshire 03301-� 27 North Main Street, Concord, New Ham • (603) 225-306o • Fax: (643) 225-3059 PRINTED ON i�;) " Conservation Law Foundation There are several reasons why a trip reduction program at IDX is important and why the state should advocate for such a program. First, the state's Comprehensive Energy Plan recommends these kinds of programs to save energy and reduce automobile emissions. Second, both the state and Chittenden County MPO's long range transportation plans call for greater use of transportation demand management. Third, an IDX program could help ensure the success of the commuter rail project, since this rail line could readily serve the IDX facility. Finally, IDX expansion plans involve an increase in employment of 1300 people by 2005 with 700 additional automobile trips in the AM peak hour and 600 new trips in the PM peak hour. Ui:less IDX implements an aggressive alternative transportation program, access .and congestion along Route 7 will continue to worsen with demands for further road widening by .the state. As a starting point for discussion; CLF recommends that an IDX trip reduction program consist of the following basic elements: Development and implementation of a comprehensive trip reduction plan for achieving peak period worker -.to -vehicle ratios of 1.75. IDX would have broad discretion in choosing trip reduction measures to meet this target. Employers'usually select a variety of options for meeting targets: starting a.vanpool program, promoting telecommuting, and offering cheaper or more convenient parking for carpoolers. • Development and implementation of an IDX-sponsored ridersharing program. For example, IDX could provide vans for van pools or help employees lease or buy vans. Companies. across the country have set up innovative programs to -promote ride -sharing, often with great success. A federal study of employer ridersharing programs showed that vehicle trips were reduced on the average by over one -fifth, nand sometimes by one-half. At Bath Iron Works in Maine, for example, one in four employees participates in that company's ridesharing program.'Employers with active ridesharing programs report reduced parking expenses, greater worker productivity, reduced absenteeism and tardiness, and much lower parking costs. The most effective employer program is to offer employees financial or other rewards for not driving to work alone. IDX could offer more convenient parking for carpoolers or subsidize van. pools and public transportation fares. IDX also could implement a "green parking/transportation voucher program." Instead of free parking, employees would receive . a voucher worth the• cash value of the free parking benefit (e.g. $30 per month). These vouchers could be exchanged for parking privileges or exchanged for cash. Employees who cash out their parking privilege could use the money to cover bus or commuter rail expenses or keep the entire sum if they bike or walk to work. • IDX also could establish free shuttle services to park -and -ride lots, the commuter rail station in South Burlington, bus stations, and shopping centers. ® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER . Conservation Law Foundation •. For bikers,.IDX chould offer storage facilities and showers. One critical element is a "guaranteed ride home" program for carless employees in case of bad weather, emergencies or late nights at the office. • . Appointment at IDX of one person to be the "employee transportation coordinator". Coordinators use everything from bulletin boards to computers to help match ridersharers, organize vanpools, and. provide information to employees. on public- transportation options. In summary, right now, IDX and state government have the opportunity to promote clean transportation alternatives =- an opportunity that should not be wasted. I would be. glad to sit down with you or your staff and IDX to discuss these concepts in more detail. I understand that AOT already is considering the basic concept of trip reduction for IDX. CLF's interest here is to assist in making this concept a reality through discussion with all affected parties. I look -forward to hearing your perspective on these recommendations: Again, CLF would be willing to try to. facilitate.a.meeting between IDX and your agencies, if this would be useful. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Sinclair Director/CLF-VT cc: Richard Valentinetti, VANR Jonathan Peress, ANR Act 250 Attorney j 3 ® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 04/30/99 09:06 FAX 802 846 1107 HYPERION TELECOM Z 02 Hyperi�i,,,,:"iin COMMUNICATIONS April 30, 1999 Mr. Jim Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vt. 05452 Re: IDX Campus Expansion Applicatioh # 4CO391-9 Dear Mr. Boyd: Hyperion Communications has received notice of the proposed expansion to the IDX Corporate headquarters located at 1400 Shelburne Road. Currently, Hyperion Telecommunications provides the following services: Primary Rate ISDN service, Basic Rate ISDN service, and Point to Point digital services. Hyperion Communications will be pleased to provide additional service(s) to accommodate additional need resulting from the IDX expansion project. Hyperion has the ability to serve the proposed expansion without affecting our present customers. Please feel free to contact Jeff McCarthy, Sales Manager at 802-846-1234 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Bob Frost GM 102 Kimball Avenue South Burlington, VT05403 Phone 802.846.7234 l Fax 802.846.1107 stomer Service 802.846.1111 7 DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC A T T 0 R` E Y s A T L A W COURTIIOUSE PLAZA • 199 MAIN STREET • i0 Box 190 • BURLINGTON • VERMONT 05402 0190 +1 802 863 2375 • rAx +1 802 862 7512 May 24, 1999 Jim Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4C0391-9 Supplemental Filings Dear Jim: Attached please find an original and four copies of the following documents for filing with respect to the above -referenced project: a) Letter from Joe Weith, Director of Planning and Zoning for the City of South Burlington, regarding sewer allocation, dated April 22, 1999. b) Letter from David Scott of the Vermont Agency of Transportation responding to the Commission's concerns about what might happen on Shelburne Road in the future if the Shelburne Road project does not move forward as planned. The letter is dated May 4, 1999. c) IDX Preliminary Traffic Demand Management (TDM) Plan, dated April 27, 1999. d) IDX letter to the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization regarding organization of a Traffic Management Association, dated April 27, 1999. e) Letter from David Scott of the Agency of Transportation to Mark Sinclair of the Conservation Law Foundation regarding IDX Trip Reduction Program, dated May 7, 1999. 0 Ability to Serve letter from Hyperion Telecommunications, dated April 30, 1999 g) Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Jim, I also enclose a 3.5" diskette containing a copy of this document. The document is in a format that is compatible with your word processing system. i S•r. JollvsliURY VT 13R:\7`I'LhBORO VT 1,11TI.1:TON NI I +1 802 748 8324 +1 802 258:3070 +1 603 111 0216 DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC Jim Boyd May 24, 1999 Page 2 We expect to file with you shortly a letter from South Burlington School District regarding the expected impact of this project on South Burlington schools. We will also file within the next couple of days a legal memorandum in support of the applicant's April 6`h request for a fee reduction. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dale A. Rocheleau Enclosures cc: Parties on Certificate of Service I3'FV\130321.2 . J l DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I, Dale Rocheleau, Attorney for BDP Realty Associates, delivered a copy of the foregoing documents, in the matter of BDP Realty Associates, Land Use Application #4C0391-9, either by personal delivery or by certified U.S. mail, postage paid, this 24th day of May, 1999, to the following: BDP Realty Associates by Ronald Roberts c/o IDX Corporation 1500 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 IDX Systems Corporation by Michelle Russo, Administration Manager 1400 Shelburne Road P.O. Box 1070 Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Downs Rachlin & Martin PLLC by Dale Rocheleau, Esq. 199 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Burlington, VT 05402-0190 Kessel/Duff Corporation by Brad Carter, President P.O. Box 788 57 Talcott Road Williston, VT 05495 City of South Burlington by Joe Weith, City Manager 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission by Arthur R. Hogan, Jr., Executive Director 66 Pearl Street, P.O. Box 108 Essex Junction, VT 05453 Agency of Natural Resources by Jon Groveman, Esq. 103 South Main Street - Center Bldg., 311 Floor Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0301 DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC Certificate of Service BDP Realty Associates IDX Expansion Project Page a Agency of Transportation by David Scott 133 State Street Montpelier, VT 05633 Agency of Commerce and Community Development by Curt Carter National Life Building, Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-0501 Pammella S. Starbuck 147 West Shore Road Grand Isle, VT 05458 Steve Kornemann 85 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 The Friends of the University of Vermont Horticultural Farm by Kristina Bielenberg, Esq. PO Box 64788 Burlington, Vermont 05406-4788 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (Cover letter only) Greater Burlington Industrial Corp. (GBIC) by Frank Cioffi, President P.O. Box 786, 60 Main Street Burlington, VT 05402 Economic & Policy Resources, Inc. by Jeffrey Carr and Larry Copp 439 Essex Road P.O. Box 1660 Williston, VT 05495 Ken Kaliski Resource Systems Group, Inc. 76 Olcott Drive White River Jct., VT 05001-2313 DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN PLLC Certificate of Service BDP Realty Associates IDX Expansion Project Paae 3 Trudell Consulting Engineers by Debra Bell PO Box 308 Williston, Vermont 05495 Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 24th day of May, 1999. Dale A. Rocheleau, Esq. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 22, 1999 Angela Baker Downs, Rachlin & Martin 199 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sewer Allocation, IDX Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Ms. Baker: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting on January 26, 1999 approved a sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd for the proposed IDX office expansion. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation has been placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sic cerely, oe Weith, Director Planning and Zoning J W/mcp - 1 AGFSTATE OF VERMONT >Q AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 tispOIVRI May 4, 1999 RECEIVED Mr. James Boyd, District Coordinator MAY - 6 1999 District Environmental Commission #4 DOWNS, RACHLIN 111 West Street & MARTIN Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4CO391-9 Dear Mr. Boyd: The Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) understands that the District Commission has concerns about what might happen on Shelburne Road, in the future, if the Shelburne Road project does not move forward to completion. To assist the Commission with understanding the current and future conditions on Shelburne Road, I have attached a copy of page 12 from the Resource Systems Group, Inc. Traffic Impact Study submitted to the Commission. The table on page 12 provides the seconds of delay and the corresponding level of service for each of the impacted intersections along Shelburne Road in the year 2005, under build and no build conditions. • NO BUILD: No IDX expansion and no road improvements. • BUILD: IDX expansion and no road improvements. The intersections of US 7/Allen Rd. and US 7/Pine Haven are the two intersections that will experience the most congestion in 2005. I have circled the critical movements for each of the intersections and as you can see, the intersections are failing with or without the IDX expansion. Please note, that as intersections reach failure, the models used to calculate delay tend to breakdown and the forecasted delays increase rapidly. There is no question that Shelburne Road has significant problems with congestion in both the AM and PM peak hours. The Shelburne Road reconstruction project is the Agency of Transportation's attempt to correct the situation. If the project fails to obtain all necessary permits or is halted for other reasons, the Agency will still need to make improvements to the corridor. The improvements would most likely be minor spot improvements, that would relieve some congestion, but not solve the long term issues. 1 Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. James Boyd DEC #4 May 4, 1999 Page 2 The Agency has estimated the cost, of the left turn lane at the US 7/IDX Drive intersection to be $80,000.00. The Agency will commit to completing the left turn lane. The lane is currently designed as a part of the Shelburne Road reconstruction project, but if the project should fail to advance on a time line compatible with the IDX expansion, the Agency will ensure the turn lane is constructed independent of the larger project. The Agency currently expects to begin construction on the highway portion of the Shelburne Road project in 2001 and complete the project in 2002. This assumes that the permitting process, including any appeals, is completed by the end of 1999. This construction period should coincide with IDX reaching 300 additional employees. We do not feel that it is important for the project to be completed prior to IDX reaching 300 employees. However, we do believe any IDX permit condition should reflect that construction of the turn lane should be underway prior to IDX reaching 300 employees. Please feel free to contact me at (802) 828-2663 if the District Commission has any questions or needs further clarification on any of the issues I have addressed. Sincerely, David J. Scott, P.E. Director of Project Development DJS:djs c: Dale Rocheleau, Downs Rachlin & Martin Ms. Michelle Russo, IDX Corp. Ken Kaliski, Resource Systems Group Richard Ranaldo, VAOT Michael Pologruto, VAOT CAWORDPERFOOCUMEN'I)DEV REVIJDX250 2 IDX Expansion Tratfic Impact Study 16 February 1999 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 12 �Li r f SLIo.✓s �!40 e S- Ala e..,c��s Table 5: Level of Service Results, 2005 (Continued) INTERSECTION LANEIAPPROACH 2O05 AM 2005 PM NO BUILD BUILD NO BUILD BUILD US 7/BALDWIN AVE. DRIVEWAY, EB 18.4 C 18.4 C 19.5 C 19.5 C A o,t BALDWIN AVE, WB 21.3 C 21.7 C 19.9 C 19.9 C US7,N8 0.2A 0.2A 1.4A 2.7A Too US7,SB 0.2A 0.6A 1A 1.1A OVERALL INTERSECTION 1.2 A 1.4 A 1.9 A 2.6 A US 7/MCINTOSH AVE FAYETTE DRIVE, EB 15.4 C 19.5 C 19.8 C 20.5 C MCINTOSH AVE, WB 14.9 8 18.5 C 18.8 C 19.4 C US7,N8 2.4A 0.5A 2.9A 5.26 US7,SB 14.76 14.18 13.5E 12.16 OVERALL INTERSECTION 9.48 9.36 8.5 B 8.8 B US 7/HOLMES RD/IDX DR HOLMES ROAD, EB 15 B 20.1 C 23 C 24.3 C IDX DRIVE, WB 14.96 9.38 15 B 37.1 D it US7,N8 98 46.7E 13.8E 19.4C US7.S8 7.1 B 52.5E 0.2A 0.6A OVERALL INTERSECTION 8.2 B 48.8 E 9 8 16.5 C US 7/BARTLETT BAY RD BARTLETT BAY RD, EB 19.2 C 19.2 C 36.1 D 43.8 E 1m✓>�k v F GREEN MTN RD, WB 18.7 C 18.8 C 21.5 C 38.9 D US 7, NB 5.58 6.46 36.7 D 33.30 lD� US7,SB 0.3A 0.4A 3.4A 3.2A OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.7 A 4.3 A 20.8 C 21 C US 7/ALLEN RD ALLEN RD, WS 36.1 D 40.3 E 24.9 C 25.3 D US7,N8 e�0 4 Vc ., G cry .-✓�a ZO 77F 119.5E 18.6C 12.98 US7,SG 1.8A 1.8A 16.8C 33.80 OVERALL INTERSECTION 3.2E 72.9 F 18.4 C 25 C US 7/PINE HAVEN PINE HAVEN, EB 18.6 C 18.6 C 24.2 C 24.2 C LOCUST HILL, WB 18.8 C 18.8 C 27 D 27 D �r US7,NB 2.4A 3.4A 1.4A 1.4A �34.6 �O72.4F US 7, B C✓an �✓/D II%( 1.9 A 2.3 A OVERALL INTERSECTION 2.8 A 3.5 A US 7/13AY RD BAY ROAD, EB 13.3 8 13.48 33.70 33.7 D EXECUTIVE DRIVE, WB 12.6 B 12.68 21.7 C 21.7 C US7.NB 4.8A 5.28 21C 21.3C US7,SB 3.8A 3.9A 16.5C 25.7D OVERALL INTERSECTION 5 A 5.3 B 19.9 C 24.1 C oil oq/28/99 �tED 16:04 FAX 206 623 3950 I 17Fr ) LgUU3 I ■w ZD X TAAN S Pd2TAT1()AJ 'VeAMAI D id =X H E A l T H C 4 R E INFORMATION S O l V T 1 0 N 5 ��- • �� • �• 1 Traffic Dcmand Manap-cnient Plan Status Rcport April 27, 1999 As part of our Act 250 permit process, IDX is evaluating appropriate policies and procedures that will assist in managing traffic flow from out- site at peak traffic hours. Several sug;;estions have been provided by Peter Pluntcau from the Chittcnden County Metropolitan Planning Organization and Jeanette Berry from the Chirtenden County Transportation Authority. Listed below arc programs that IDX feels confident in committing to given t11c information we currently have on hand. Flexible Arrival and Departure times will be encouraged for all employees. T}. is policy will be administered at the manager level and will only require notification or requests from employees to their respective managers. Preferential Parkin¢ for Car Poolers We do have some employees participatin; in car pools at present. (Car Pools are addressed later in this report.) IDX will post signs restricting general parking at preferred locations so that those spaces are available for employees willing to participate. Bike Racks Locker Rooms & Showers. Our interior design includes large faci'.itics for anyone wishing to bike, run or walk to and from work. We will distribute information for the Vermont Ride Share Program to every Vl:rmont employee. In addition to t11c above, we have initiated an electronic questionnaire that will Ile sent to all employees to help us understand their willingness to change their commute habits. A copy of the first draft of the questionnaire is attached. Jeanette Berry will be assisting us with the evaluatior of the completed questionnaires. Our intent is to have some success with the following programs. Use of public transportation with company -paid bus passes. IDX pays for publi•, transportation in many outer cities. CCTA has committed to altering bus routes to make this service ea:;y for our staff to use. Use of Car Pools to a much greater extent than we arc currently experiencing Zvi th the assistance from' CCTA's Guaranteed Ride Home Program and Ride Matching Program. Use of the Commuter Rail When the State determines it will be built. Frec Coffee:I31-caklast for e111 lovices arriving 91 our cafeteria before S:00A1\•1. \!re will be evaluating the of ordability of albs program. II?\ ix also veI gigging to conlntit to active participation in a 'I raflic I\•lana2�cmeut Association for jhi Iburne I\'nad. \\'e have t,let with Peter plur11cau flung 111 1\11'0 on a couple o occasions, and will b� iuukint 10 llle \•11'CJ Ior Icadcrship and expertise in this area. 1001 Fourth Avenulr PIaEA I Suite rS00 I Suatlle. WA 98154.1144 1 12061 622.9558 1 Ivww.idx.r.om 04,128/99 WED 16:04 FAX 206 623 3950 1 17Fr- Li Uvti IDX EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION SURVEY IDX and the Vermont Rideshare Program are evaluating issues than impact your daily commute. As you complete this survey, please add any additional information you feel may be important. 1. What town do you live in? 2. What major intersection, landmark is closest to your home? 3. What is the round trip distance of your daily commute? 4. What is your estimated daily cost to commute? 5. What time do you usually arrive at work? am/pm 6. What time do you usually leave work? am/pm 7. Which days do you usually commute to work? Monday - Friday except Saturday Sunday 8. Compared to the various activities you conduct during the day, Iiow stressful do you find your commute to work? (check one) — More stressful than most activities — About as stressful as most activities — Less stressfully than most activities 9. What are the most stressfully aspects of your commute? (check i3ll that apply) — Distance _Expense _Road Conditions _ Auto dependability _ Weather _Traffic Environmental degradat on Other _ 10. How many days per week do you usually travel to work using each of the modes listed below? NOTE: Driving with a spouse is considered a carpool. Drive alone _ days a week — Carpool _ days a week _ number of people _ Bus _ Walk _ Bicycle _ Get dropped off 11. How many times a week do you make stops for the following reasons on your way to or from work? — Drop off/pick up children at school/childcare Pick up/drop of carpooler Errands/personal services shopping _ Eat _ Exercise _ Other (describe) 12. Do you avoid Shelburne road during peak hours? (TOO - 9:OOam find 3:30 - 5:30prn) i 04 /28/99 F$ED 16: 05 FAX 206 623 3950 1 171-r• L�,j u u j Yes No Sometimes 13. What type of work do you normally do? — Secretarial/Clerical Profess iona[/TechnicaI _ Sales/Service _Prod uction/Crafts _ Manager/Administrator Other: 14. What would encourage you to vanpool or carpool to work? Plea:;e answer even if you are Presently ridesharing. (check all that apply) My commitment to energy and environmental conservation A guaranteed ride home in an emergency — Extend life of my vehicle _ Company and conversation during my commute — Increased personal time in my daily life Relief from daily driving — Other 15. Are you interested in Vanpooling to IDX? _Yes No Are you interested in Ridesharing to IDX? _Yes No 16. How long have you worked at IDX? _Years _Months 17. Are you _Male _Female Married/Partnered _Parent of dependent children _Unmarried 18. Would you use the Commuter Rail if service from the train to IDX ,tvas provided? Why or why not? 19. Would you like to receive additional information about the Vermon: Rideshare Program? Name Address City Zip 20. Please add any additional comments about your commute that you think may be of interest to the Vermont Rideshare Program or to IDX. 9 The Friends of the Horticulture Farm P.O. Box 64788 Burlington, VT 05406-4788 April 6, 1999 Helen M. Toor, Chair District #4 Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 RE: BDP Realty Associates c/o IDX Corporation, Application #4C0391-9 Dear Chair Toor: I write to inform you that The Friends of the Horticulture Farm ("The Friends") has decided to withdraw its request for party status under EB Rule 14(B)(2).' As I indicated at the hearing on March 23, 1999, The Friends decided to enter its appearance in this matter because it has been our corporate purpose since 1994 to protect, promote and enhance the UVM Horticultural Research Center ("Hort. Farm"), its plant collections, and natural areas for education, research, and public enrichment. The Hort. Farm, acquired by the State College of Agriculture in 1952, with State and federal funds, and since used by The University of Vermont for horticultural and agronomic research, extension, and education, is a significant 90+ acre public open -space resource in the heart of urbanizing Chittenden County. The application filed by BDP Realty Associates ("BDP") failed, in The Friends' opinion, to identify and adequately address reasonably foreseeable and unnecessary adverse impacts arising from the IDX expansion that would materially jeopardize or interfere with the function and public's use and enjoyment of or access to the Hort. Farm property. See 10 V.S.A. §6086(a)(9)(K). Specifically, The Friends foresaw two areas of land use conflict affecting the Hort. Farm and The Friends' interest in that resource arising from IDX's expansion. First, portions of the Hort. Farm are used for highly sensitive food crop research and the orchards are periodically treated with pesticides. The Hort. Farm gates are regularly open to the public during the weekday, but in recent years unsupervised visitation by employees of neighboring businesses, including IDX, has resulted in fear by some UVM researchers that their work and the safety of the public are at risk. Given the proposed expansion of IDX and the attendant increase in employees, as well as the absence of outdoor recreational amenities on the proposed IDX campus, it is predictable that public visitation to the Hort. Farm, especially during lunch time, will increase. Without fencing to isolate sensitive research, signing to keep visitors out of areas subject to spraying, and a plan to educate IDX employees about ' Please note for the record that The Friends' oral request for party status at the March 23, 1999 hearing was made, alternatively, under EB Rule 14(B)(1) and (2). The March 26, 1999, Hearing Recess Order indicates that The Friends was preliminarily granted party status under EB Rule 14(B)(2). It does not indicate, however, that The Friends requested or was denied party status under EB Rule 14(B)(1). responsible visitation to the Hort. Farm, The Friends believe that the response would likely be to close the gates of the Hort. Farm, thereby curtailing public access to and use of the facility -- something that would neither be in the interest of The Friends nor the University as a whole, given their respective missions. Our second concern is that the IDX expansion will result in a significant increase in traffic on Green Mountain Drive which will adversely affect ingress and egress to the Hort. Farm through its existing entrance. This will be compounded by the fact that access to and from the proposed parking garage and east parking area will be almost directly opposite the Hort. Farm entrance drive. With careful planning and cooperation between the players -- IDX, the City of South Burlington, The University of Vermont, The Friends, and various neighbors -- a new entrance for the Hort. Farm could be created that would provide access to those portions of the property that are least sensitive to public visitation, thereby reducing some of the conflicts noted above. In the interest of resolving some of the above issues in an amicable fashion, members of The Friends' Land Use Committee met with BDP and IDX representatives last week and I talked with Linda Seavey at the UVM Planning Office. As a result, The Friends is optimistic that the interested parties can come together as a working group to creatively address any use conflicts as they arise or are anticipated in order to ensure that the Hort. Farm remains a vital horticultural education and research facility for all Vermonters into the 21 st century and beyond. Toward this end, IDX representative Michelle Russo has agreed to serve on such a working group. We note that were the proposed IDX campus located in a rural community, such as the Husky project in Milton, the applicant would be required to develop an open space plan to assure the long-term protection of important agricultural and natural resources on adjacent properties. Unfortunately, the IDX site, which once consisted of soils of State-wide significance was long ago converted to pavement and commercial use, so there is no opportunity for mitigation by protecting prime agricultural soils, even those on the adjacent Hort. Farm. The Friends believe, however, that IDX, as a "good neighbor," can greatly contribute to and benefit from having the Hort. Farm as a significant open -space resource in its backyard. We therefore look forward to working with IDX, its officers, and employees on projects to enhance the Hort. Farm and its various amenities. We thank the Commission for considering and granting our request for party status by permission. However, we respectfully withdraw as a 14(B) party in this proceeding in the interest of promoting good will and further discussions amongst representatives of the applicant, IDX, The University and others concerning the future of the Hort. Farm. We would be happy, however, to provide the Commission with any information it would like concerning the Hort. Farm's history and use. Toward that end, we include for each Commissioner a copy of a recent publication by Dr. Norman E. Pellett about this facility. Copies have also been sent or hand -delivered to the parties listed on the certificate of service. Sincerely, Kristina L. Bielenberg Representative for 7 The Friends of the Horticulture Farm Encl. cc: Certificate of Service 4 .. CLr Conservation Law Foundation April 6, 1999 Michele Russo IDX Systems Corporation 1400 Shelburne Road ..P.O. Box 1070 'Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: IDX Trip Reduction Program Dear Ms. Russo: I am a senior attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF). CLF is a member - supported, non-profit environmental organization that works to solve environmental problems in Vermont and New England. For the last several years, CLF has been working diligently in the region to promote cleaner, cheaper, and more efficient transportation policies and alternatives. 'CLF understands that IDX intends to expand its Shelburne Road facility substantially in the next several years and recently has applied for Act 250 and state indirect source air pollution control permits. While CLF has no o$jections.to IDX expansion, we are concerned about the increased commuter traffic and'Route 7 congestion that the expansion undoubtedly will cause. The. effects of worsening traffic on Chittenden County communities is clear to anyone who drives along Route 7. Traffic congestion will continue to grow unless we find new solutions. At the same time, most.transportation planners are concluding that more road -building is not the answer. We simply have to find more effective, cheaper, and cleaner ways to cut congestion, such as improving public transportation and ridesharing. Therefore, CLF recommends that IDX consider implementir><g some innovative strategies to reduce the automobile traffic that the company's expansion plans will generate and become a business leader in promoting clean transportation alternatives in Vermont. In the context of the pending state permit reviews, CLF respectfully request§ that IDX commit to develop and implement an "employer trip reduction" program to reduce traffic congestion, parking. problems, and lower transportation costs. Such a program could serve as a prototype for other large employers in, Vermont to do their part to reduce Vermont's automobile dependency. Trip reduction programs are employer -adopted. programs designed to help employees get to work without driving alone. In many parts of the country, large employers Pike IDX have developed comprehensive trip reduction programs which increase employees options for commuting. As a result, some firms have reported reductions of up to 75 percent in the number of employees who drive alone to work.. 15 East State,St., Suite 4, Montpelier, Vermont 05602-3010 • (802) 223-5992 • Fax: (802) 223-0060 • Web: www.clf.org 120 Tillson Avenue, Rockland, Maine 04841-3416 • (207) 594-8107 • Fax: (207) 596-7706 62 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1016 • (617) 350-0990 • Fax: (617) 350-4030 PRINTED ONE) 27 North Main Street, Concord, New Hampshire 03301-4930 • (603) 225-3060 • Fax: (603) 225-3059 RECYCLED PAPER Conservation Law Foundation A trip reduction program at IDX could hold great promise. I understand that the IDX expansion will involve an increase in employment of approximately 1300 people by 2005 with 700 additional automobile trips in the AM peak hour and 600 new trips in the PM peak hour. Unless an aggressive alternative transportation program is implemented, access and congestion along Route 7 will continue to worsen with calls for expensive, additional road - Widening. At the same time,. the company's facility is blessed by -its location in close proximity to the proposed new commuter rail. While the location of the South Burlington station is yet to be determined, the rail service certainly will provide a convenient alternative for commuting for many. IDX employees. According to the Vermont Agency of Transportation, IDX already has. committed to develop travel demand management measures to mitigate the effects of peak hour traffic. If so, that is great news. However, to ensure effectiveness, CLF suggests that a formal trip reduction progam be designed with specific targets as part of the Act 250 process. CLF would be willing to assist in designing such a program in partnership with IDX. - In any event, CLF recommends that an IDX trip reduction program consist of the following basic elements: • Development and implementation of a comprehensive trip reduction plan. for achieving. peak period worker -to -vehicle ratios of 1.75. IDX would have broad discretion in choosing trip reduction measures to meet this target. Employers usually select a variety of options for. meeting targets: starting a vanpool program, promoting telecommuting, and offering cheaper or more convenient parking for carpoole.rs. • Development and implementation of an IDX-sponsored ridersharing program. For example, IDX could provide vans for van pools or help employees lease or buy vans. Companies across the country have set up innovative programs to promote ride -sharing; often with great success. A federal study. of employer ridersharing programs showed that vehicle trips were reduced on the average by over one -fifth, and sometimes by one-half. At Bath Iron Works in' Maine, for example, one in four employees participates ,in that company's ridesharing program. Employers with active ridesharing programs report reduced parking expenses, greater worker productivity, reduced absenteeism and. tardiness, and much lower parking costs. • The most effective employer program is to offer employees financial or other rewards for not driving to work alone. IDX could offer more convenient parking for carpoolers or subsidize van pools and public transportation fares. IDX also could implement a "green parking/transportation voucher program." Instead of free parking, employees would receive a voucher worth the cash value of the free parking benefit (e,g. $30 per month). These vouchers could be exchanged for parking privileges or exchanged for cash. Employees who cash out their parking privilege could use the money to cover bus or commuter rail expenses or keep the entire sum if they bike or walk to work. ® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 4 Conservation Law Foundation • IDX also could establish free shuttle services to.park-and-ride lots, the commuter rail station in South Burlington, bus stations, and shopping centers. • For bikers, IDX chould offer storage facilities and showers. One critical element is a "guaranteed ride home" program for carless employees in case of bad weather, emergencies or late nights at the office. • Appointment at IDX of one person to be the "employee transportation coordinator". Coordinators use everything from bulletin boards to computers to help match ridersharers, organize vanpools, and provide information to employees on public transportation options. In summary, rightnow, IDX has the opportunity to promote clean transportation alternatives an opportunity that CLF hopes will not be wasted. I would be glad to sit down with you or your consultants to discuss these concepts in more detail. I want to emphasize that CLF's interest here. is to assist in making this concept a reality through discussion and consensus rather than to advocate our'position in an adversarial permitting process. We have learned that collaboration and partnership with business is usually the best way to reach agreement and make real progress on environmental issues. For example, we have had great success in recent years in collaborating upfront with'companies like American Ski' Company and New England Power Company in dealing with difficult development issues. CLF hopes we can have a similar relationship with IDX involving these transportation issues. I look forward to hearing your perspective on these recommendations. I will follow up with a telephone call later this week or call me at your convenience. Thank you for considering these ideas. Sincerely, Mark Sinclair Director/CLF-VT cc: James Boyd, District Coordinator, Act 250. Dale Rocheleau, Esq. Brad Carter South Burlington City Clerk Peter, Plumeau, Chittenden County MPO Ronald Roberts David Scott, VAOT Jonathan Peress, VANR 3 ® PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 22, 1999 Angela Baker Downs, Rachlin & Martin 199 Main Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Sewer Allocation, IDX Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Ms. Baker: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting on January 26, 1999 approved a sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd for the proposed IDX office expansion. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation has been placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. loe Weith, Director Planning and Zoning JW/mcp RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. AAZIJi 11 To: Amy Gamble Art Hogan Joe Segale Joe Weith From: Ken Kaliski Michael McCrory Subject: Revised IDX Expansion TIS Date: 16 February 1999 Copy to: Susan Lambeth For the IDX Act 250 submittal, we made minor changes to the January 21 Traffic Impact Study. The following changes were made: A Sections 5.2 & 5.3: Changes to signal timing at Queen City Park Road, IDX Drive, and Allen Street intersections. These changes have reduced the calculated queue lengths and levels of service for the above intersections. A Changes have been made to the discussion of Imperial Drive levels of service. The January 21 report indicated that the Imperial Drive levels of service were made better by restricting right -turn -on -reds from IDX Drive. This is not correct and the supporting documentation for this is found in the new report. Other minor editing corrections to the text and layout of this report have also been made. None of these changes affect the conclusions and recommendations of the January 21 report. 76 Olcott Drive White River Junction Vermont 05001-2313 Tel.• 802.295.4999 Fax: 802.295.1006 e-mail.• rsg@rsginc.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES 2) Name of Subdivision IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 3) Submit Subdivision Fee $125.00 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) : P.U.D. consisting of 334,000sf (+/-) of office (124,200 existing + 209,820 new); 20,500sf of reception/multi-media ctr. / cafeteria; and on -site parking for 1,394 vehicles. Located on 16.7 acre parcel. 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: NO CHANGES 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Trudell Consulting Engineers Williston, VT 802/879-6331 b. Surveyor same as above c . Architect Freeman French Freeman Burlington, VT 802/864-6844 dsca2e Architect d. --- Office of H. Keith Wagner Colchester, VT 802/655-0010 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: NO CHANGES Fi k 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: See attached list 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application: See attached plan set entitled "IDX EXPANSION" dated November, 1998. 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings $ 20,545,000 b ) Landscaping $ 400,000 (plantings and other hardscape) c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work Sitework: $1,815,000; Parking Deck: $4,500,000 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2 -way traf fic , in plus out) : See attached Traffic Study prepared by Resource Systems, dated November 1998. 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City.. b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 2 d) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. e) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdi- vided. f) Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately main- tained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. g) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of exist- ing ground elevation will be five feet or more. h) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. i) Numerical and graphic scale, date and truce north arrow. j) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. k) Details of proposed connection with the existing sani- tary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 1) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. m) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. n) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culvert which may be required. o) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless on existing street intersection is -shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. p) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 3 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) • Construction to commence upon the receipt of necessary local/state permits (May 1999). Construction to be completed within twenty-four (24) months. 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: 1. Section 25.113 (Height of Structures) 2. Section 25.107 (Front yard setback) - along Green Mt. Drive 3. Section 26.25 (Off street parking) - total number of spaces 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. J (Signat ) applicant or contact person John Caulo, Kessel/Duff Corporation //. /6. .)' es 4 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates) : Construction to commence upon the receipt of necessary local/state permits (May 1999). Construction to be completedn in two (2) phases. Total construction period: 48 Months. 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: 1. Section 25.107-Structure wyi front yard setback. (parking deck along Green Mtn. Dr.) 2. Section 25.113 - Height of Structures 3. Section 26.25 - Off-street parking (total number of spaces) 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. (Signature) applicant or contact person Kessel/Duff Corp. 4 CONTR41CTOR: KE55EL/DUFF CORPORATION 57 TALCOTT ROAD NILLISTON, VERMONT 06495 TEL.: (502) 67q-2g66 FAX: (802) 67q-21167 ARCHITECT., FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. 81 MAPLE STREET BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL., (602) 864-6644 FAX: (1502) 860-1615 STRUCTUR14L: LANES CONSULTING ENGINEERS ROUTE 2A WILLISTON, VERMONT 054% TEL (802) 878-86g7 Fax: (602) 878-g312 CIVIL: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 14 BLAIR PARK ROAD WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 TEL,1 (602) 87q-6331 FAX: (802) 87q-0060 LANDSCAPE: OFFICE OF H, KEITH NAGNER 504A DALTON DRIVE COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 TEL.: (002) 655-0010 FAX: (802) 655-0021 INTERIORS: GHK, INC. ONE FANEUIL HALL MARKETPLACE BOSTON, MA 0210q-1646 TEL.: (617) 728-2180 FAX: (617) 725-6308 IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION ROJECTINFORMATION CAMPUS P EXISTING ffiUILOING SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 1ST FLOORR 42,132 SF OFFICE 2ND FLO(JR 41 234 SF OFFICE 3RD pL047R 4d,B42 SF OFFICE -T TAB j?d,33�BF OFFICE 124,206 5F OFFICE BUILDING FINAL S TE Y.LAN AFPLICA I IU JANUARY 6, 1999 51JILDING PERS 'ECt11rE JAN o b 1999 city of So. Burlington SITE SECTION PROPOSED DUILDING GROUND FLOOR 16 030 SF OFFICE 2'� 514 SF STORAGE I5T FLOOR 45170 SF OFFICE 2ND FLOOR 374 SF STORAGE 45,170 SF OFFICE 3RH FLO 4TDFL 495,1A700 SF OFFICE 29F 5TH F OF 4FFICEE TUIAL 0982p 5F FFICE 239, 708 SF OFFICE BUILDING TOTAL TOTAL 2q;888 SF STORAGE 2311,706 SF OFFICE TOTA 363,91E 5F OFFICE BUILDING PROP0600 LINK 1ST FLOOR 10,238 5F ASSEMBLY (TRAINING R ) 2ND FL R TOTAL-3d9b-SF�358F18LY� 10,2 8 SF ASSEMBLY (CAFETERIA) PARKING COUNT "Rogow Recw o m 26 ON GRADE �DE q" ON PARKING DECK 457 VIP SPACES IN 363,9I6 5.F. OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED Q_LD3C,___.. _.3. + 250 S.F./SPACE L 1�429 1'SNORTFALDL OF I SPACES • 2.12% SITE WYMAGE ALLOIUASLE BUILDINGS 173, 753 5F 23.111-64.3% 70% PAVEMENT 2g7,35B SF 40.1 OPENS,Oq 5F 35.2% 30% TOTAL 726,720 SF 100.0% SETBACK PERCENTAGE PAVED ACTuAL Aw ow"LE ROUTE 7 FRONT YARD 0% 30% IDX DRIVE FRONT YARD 31.8X 309 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 21.5% 30% ZONING NOTES ZONE COMMERCIAL 2 C2 TRASH ALL TRASH STORAGE INSIDE EXIST'G GARAGE 6 NEW BASEMENT BIKES BIKE RACKS IN PARKING GARAGE DRALUING LIST: BOUNDARY PLAT, BDP REALTY ASSOCIAT155 SPI MASTER SITE PLAN SP2 SITE PLAN 30 SCALE 5P3 SITE PLAN BO SCALE PI IDX ROAD EXTEN51ON P2 GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE EXTENSION DI WATER DETAILS D2 STORM DRAIN DETAILS InER05ION CONTROL DETAILS 04 SITE DETAILS D5 SANITARY DETAIL5 LANDSCAPE L-I LANDSCAPING PLAN L-2 LIGHTING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A3.1 ELEVATIONS A3.2 ELEVATIONS AS.3 PHASE ELEVATIONS A4.1 GARAGE PLANS AND SECTION BDP REALTY ASSOCIA77ON v. 297 p. 623 EASEMENT AND R.O.W FOR 1 VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL FROM DENNIS BLODGETT -14 PLAZA INVESTMENTS \ - .`l v.275 p.580 IRREVOCABLE OTTER DEDICATION FROM BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES TO \ THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINCTON .26f P.115-128 I PLAZA INVESTMENTS v. 272 p.218 EASEMENT AND R.O.W. FOR --\ VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL FROM DENNIS BLODGETT a PLAZA INVESTMENTS .276 p.221 \ IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FROM DENNIS L BLODGETT a GERALD C. MIT OTTO ICITY OF SOOT \\� SOUTH BURLINGTON v175 p.103 S18J3'12'W I W 58.08' t S23'12'42'W 70.13 308.D4' N1829'04'E EXISTING PAVEMENT _ ___ _ ___ 300 45' GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE W 126 P. 280 % TELEPHONE 20' EASEMENT TO��, PEDESTAL G.M. P.C. a N.E.T. v.270 PT6 v109 P. 516 SPRINGS - MTC SEE NOTE 5 \{ I to BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES I�I v. 439 p. 103 R 0 mb. 430 P• 26 I 2.24 ACRES PA `OARKING TELEPHONE^ I PEDESTAL MTC TIMBER RETAINING WALL N1837'46'E EXISTING BUILDING r UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT h STATE AGRICULTURE COLLEGE v.30 p.286 CA TING STORMWATER D OUT FALL N18'29"09"E 66.96' EXISTING CATCH BASIN "D------- i ASEMENT 70 THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES 126 P2B9 PAVED OT EXISTING GAB LINE EASEMENT 10 ui. GAS A05 p 6f17 BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES v. 141 P• 233 v. 317 p. 210 v. 140 p. 459 mb. 105 p. 21 EASEMENT TO G.M.P.C. 15.34 AC. TOTAL v.356 p,845 S78'33'1Y'W -- /— 525.37' S18 J3'12'w U.S. ROUTE 7 SHELBURNE ROAD 24. 00' Graphic Scale Feet 60 O 60 120 ISO 240 MTC ALLSON PARTNERSHIP v. 214 P. 451 mb. 105 p. 21 I L 70' RIGHT OF WAY SEE NOTE 6 Ili -- I ALLSON PARTNERSHIP V. 194 P. 330 mb. 105 p. 21 EXISTING BUILDING � � 1 I � 1 I PARKING LOT I N N + d� 4 � y 20' SEWER R UTILITY EASEMENT v. 69 R. 123 I l I I 10' EASEMENT i0 G.MR.C. 63 p v. 63 R. 90 VT. GAD EASEMENT .405 .607 1 EXISTING -�- SEWER MAIN .l II i i I MANHOLE I -- l I S18'34'10"W li 369,91' "Vid— I MSMlpeon _....... �b by PROJECT LOCATION THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED ON 7127198 IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. 2) CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSES CONDUCTED WITH A 1FQOD TOTAL STATION ON 7128198 AND 11124198. O REBAR ( TO BE SET) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN • MON PIPE ( FOUND ) ALONG A LEG OF THE TRAVERSE. ■ CONCRETE MONUMENT ( FOUND ) o CONCRETE MONUMENT ( TO BE SET) 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS Ydn • SURVEY MARKER ( FOUND) ALUMINUM CAPS CALCULATED POINT -----ONP---- OVERHEAD UTILITY ONES 4) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR -----W----- WATER MAIN DEUNEA TE EASEMENTS RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE -----D----- STORM DRAINS LANDS, ENCROACHMENTS ETC. OBSERVED IN THE ---5--� SANITARY SEWER FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. -----G---- GAS MAIN ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 5) THIS PARCEL MAY BE SUBJECT TO SPRING RIGHTS AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 71, PAGE 431. 6) THE 70' WIDE RIGHT OF WAY WAS ORIGINALLY SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK f05, PAGE 21. THE CITY, ADJOINING LAND OWNERS AND OTHERS MAY HAVE RIGHTS OVE THIS STRIP. JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington noMet ewe BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES r SGOTT Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, Vt. ItLDAB D— SMT = TAYLoa J* N0, ABA A Sheef flue 12 15 9B 1 60 Boundary Plat °°°—LL �"'° = �� IIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIII a� _ -- WN6 60Dk 166 CIA ow98 51 �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. M m k P.* ROAD ". 308 W .' Nmmpnt OSA95 8794m JAN 6 1999 1 CAP STORM DRAIN i.212 96 PROW, VMIE'R.. City of So. Burlington "MQ'VES PCO 09.93 1.209.68 CHAIN LINK 4. FENCE CAP AND eLocK -EXT AND CAP SEWER 04' EXISTING ;-213,6 11, EXISTING E '_R_' (@CONCRETE 21S 15 HYDRANT 1.211,68 UNDERGROUND EXISTING CURBELECTRIC B PROPOSED a' Of .15 OSD B D 2 WATER MAN __ --- I ------ i ------------------------------------------- 5 2'O:AIER MAIN Eys2t(i SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AT STA TE NO 11_-�- _`� WATER VA�W!S 77::--- -- ------ -------- END aF 6 START NEW PAVEMENT AT STA 1,15 Ex NO 0 2' _;AGRZ71I PSMH 7UZ7 v 1 'WATER ECS UP `SM 5 g j 218. 'T PCB ESMH 1-210.. 8 PCB 2 7,250 .35 END OF VALVE -211.23 1-211,11 032 TO f-209 I-C2 IT 5 s- he /1-2 34 10.12 EXISVNjj: g. FL Al W EXISTING _jML IML Al .j:_j.g._jML Al _jML Al IML Al CURB CAUN MOUNTAIN DRWE UNDERORAN UEANWT GAS Ice 4, PVC UN�RDRAII(�) VALVE -F, P STU ----------- ------- G EXISTING D, -- - ------- ---- - --------------- ------- Em TIN TELEPHONE PEDES AS,LINE ------- z .-0 PROPOSEI)B" 0.1. CLASS I =D2 52 WATEP MAIN ROD % Eq:40 a 109"E sa" STORM-21D,Dl W!29,09V I _ - IZS "A S R SEWER-20 rb 0u 2*90 UNDEADRAN -4 " . -_ ' I" ///11 _-Z ------ L 41 ZW _4 4 212 R_ ED 40' EXISTING WELL RETAIN\ P ETSA WALL F, 1*11DE'RORAIN AD' IS T&A K 0 3D� - ------- T.O.W.'k, 1980 `EXISTING - - - - - - - - - - 'IiT -T PROPr194 NG% EC813 98 5'CONCRETr 98 SIDEWALK ;84.78 ETAINING 84.50 DITCH 04 OR- If / , VC 10* NNDERDRAW 2 6NiIEibRA. 3 LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE 5 F-T FLOOR FFE-190,I) SECOND FFOOR FFE-202.0 THIRD FLOOR FFF-214.0 Ecs 19 ;;9 70' EASEMENT - 1 0.74 's L EC912 SLOPE: -192. 3 STORMSE -19 TARILIZATION - C801 FINAL 1w� IN I. 7525 15, To 1.1 75.00 SETBACK EXISTING LUMINAIRE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 190 - - - - - -COOLING 04 - - - - - - - - - TO R L0 112�15* PIC ESWH 002 R-179 TYPE D4 'E'S .tH 185.4 P 182 75 P-14ISfo I row - - - - - - EXISTIN &1711 I COB 1. 774.80 U" 1-11D.71 1-'70,42 coo _185,93 "40CURB 1. 170,92 12" R-17"' SIDEWALK Iss R._, 7 IN P579 B-O 2.61 1Y Efil 1 .7�7' I /gll 0 @HYDRANT 4; 17 10 '919.88 rV 75 m I 1# 7 yyZZ 82.7a Ce 1-0 R. .0 '800 SIOIWA� IVERIFY IN TW6' 5' CONCRET EXISTING STO" 182.83 ECS i-178.63 s S E's -183.13 Ecs #5 B4.88 1-179.13 R.- 179.94 _RTHRIST 1- 17 EsWH EXIT TING HYDRAWL" BL SEWER R-;W. 7 ,NO 8' SEWER 1 52 GO COB CONNECT TO EXISTING PSMN 82.82 a ' D.I. WIN A WATER ;;1542 I. IBO.J2 TIGHT DRESSER TYPE ECB EXISTING COUPLJNC i.175.91 EXISTIN z cc& 82.23 BUILDING POLE < j 18288 F-179J7 FFE-185.0 IL ECS i-178,98 112 PROPOSED PROP �-186.28 UNDER- Ld 180.86 iW BUILDING OROLIN WHERRI178.30' POWERD PROPOSED BU11 DIA -180. FFE-185.0 0 162 SED I-" &M,13 on EST Graphic Scale 6111111111100"01 Feet 30 0 30 60 90 20 SP2 \ ' CO ' - N ACTOR TO VERIFY - --- 2012' PVC - - ! �'T r, I /) / ,x/' EXISTING ROOF DRAIN 1 INVERT PRIOR TO NEW ' / ` iI ECB , CONSTRUCTION AND NOVFY ENGINEER PROPOSED 'el+� EXISTING .i 18.61 EXISTING ""' BUILDING ! ooERHEAD I POWER PROPOSED 2 ,` ieDB °y BUILDING y FFE=180.0 BUILDING ®I=ns.J - FFE=185.0 FFE-185.0 MAIN LEVEL NVERT Ar 82 FFE=173.0 LOWER LEVEL wrE.t69.16 N c N PROPOSED I PCB RA SFORMER 2o0.0f2 P / 1 I �� ♦ H r-f72.80 > L I / 6 PV SEWER' I i"�- - _ II 5=187.67 I A.✓T___ _ ____ _____�.__�lf___.._.-.... ...__ ,19, sT-168.96 Z i PCB710 I I SETBACK I "_ / r 1 ^ s; 7 25 -__ ! • ah a • . ♦ P I ♦ i i I...... + . f: -_._. 158'-12' PVC >.O.ppa 2 I•'67OB PCBb'9 1 ' COBBI u" y •iBB.JJ-I2 J - 177.30 m ESMH �I ECB GRANITE .I+ ?:i J 1-171.0 f r. 189.29 .. 4� 1]7.17 CURB I / BUILDING 178 1 W P W N' + I r. \ 0♦ m, i=f72.9] YARD (M+) i' 1 - r.16 ].51 02 y0 DRAIN _ r. r. ral.se i Y \ _.. .. I+__ -_ ECB i / ROTECDON P 16785 I/ �H 2 __ -16158 I/ I�� ,. � I BETA I G OPp� DS WAA IER EL .1720 5 - _ _ � u I � I G R � .f70 I�.e�PROPOSED 5' - 70' 6 / n 174.76 O RETAININ / r=181.48 PROPOSED / SIDEWALK k D♦ SS P,,D. _ 005 / 1.175.80 n L` r CLEANOUT = DROPPED CURB / A / ) T ROPOSEG H1'DFNECB7S0 EXISTING J 2B Dt URY EL.=i17.5 7 D♦ 17 8 DROPPED - y_ p- - - I I i.16D.40 \ LUMINAIRE , ^-'•, ( �1, � _y' CONS ETEe /-. D4 CURB `179 I t I ut p�p I EXISTING St ` \ T 3 W ¢ t) I HYDRANT I- \ .. _. _ PROPOSED �`.- LPN \ PROPOOSEED 5'. \ f ,rBeWA +E1...168.1 i �d l C(EANOUi ♦ \ .0 WATER D♦ SIDEWALK ,� _.,.- t � ' i..170 GkQD2j \ ....®CBp14 - \\ / WATER.16S-- CBy1'.14 -{V .. ._ 04 173 =69§ i.168. S1IC4.168.43 r72 I L! r.1895 A. RATE k O VR=1835 , WA - - - P-17a2 / \`\ I CJ Z \CLA55 32 WA R MAN 2 I UNDERDRANI '�� 'f'�OPOSED HYDRANT I ECB PROPOSED .n D2 /' VC I.16596-1' BURYEL.f723 )I Il W r.17o.9 CLEANOUT 2 Y 9 i.t)0.9 ' � `1.f67A I=18555 r.184.18 /' L _./ I i 11:16 l rI _ I BLOCK - CONCRETE p \ _. -_ ---- \`• / � I X I / i CURB- / 4' PVC UNDERDRAIN 4' PVC UNDERDRAIN J1 I.167.0 ! I-186.5 DETENTION I /' __ I BOTTOM EL..15' ' 80 I \ i SII / ECB __.__- '-\ WATER LEVEL EL.- 164.9 SlI Ee{' I PROPOSED W WATER CLASSA © TOP OF BANK \ -- ''^- J - - - P'u� RE TAININC \ \ OF DETENTION \ '` i86 POLE; WALL11 .- .._...= _BA\SIN \\ \\\\ \ OUTLET � \\ 1./61.34 /" DB3 PROPOSBE'A DSISNEDIMENT I ` e, �. FINAL PROPOSED / +I i159.59 DETENTION BASIN I I - \ s M i I J�-� I/G ELECIRk ��` \ T 1 \ -I4•G4IP x __ - -T` ` { It I / � � � _ � � PANEL ^• � ` \\ NI I I 7 - x�__� __`�� " �r _. � \ �SMM $j \� ` � � .154.11 16f.E I ROAD IMPROVEMEN S \_\ S nl i=rt )\\ / J7 r ( / r END OF EXISTING CURB (ii ♦k / � START NEW CURB l \ I \ PROPOSED (CAP EXISTING /� EXISTING D1 TAPPING N 0 !$183312•W 24• •........_.-.. f �\ _%�� ./_- I51833'12•W / -I I \\'•. 1GA85ERNCE -TER CAP XSERN CE / HYDRANT ®VALVE '// / ^ 4m •( V GAS MAIN DURING INSTALLA TON 5253,12HEADWALL - -"._..-._.. I PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR / - / `-- _ _ _ + I .. - OF NEW W- i I .... .. �, / _ __ _ - ATER MAIN _ 1� _______________ wlr� wwwwwwww-w.�� >.----__--�.��.�_��_-.._ 1.._.__-____�------��__�.,._..r_ _ _ ,mow _____�.._a.�...�� ______________ _M_�__._- �__�_�-_�- _ -� _ _______-___- _______-____-____ __- _______ ________��______..__ __x_� .-____.-.______ -_ __ _ .-. .___ ------- -- - i ._- � . - :� \ '- J23�� w cdNc ii��IIlt� EXISTING 12' ,. - EXsvNG 6" `\\ r 20' ELECTRIC _ W WATER MAIN GAS MAIN STATE OF VERAIONT I=138'45 WA -RR AIN- GAS MAIN WEXISTING 6" \� EASEMENT PROPOSED ROAD ` �'• M o IMPROVEMENTS EDGE I.ISaM - `�\ NEW CONCRETE ♦ ENO OF NEW CURB C ECB CURB e END OF EXISTING CURB OF PAVEMENT 1.158.J2 ``. 16J.03 SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 EXISTING EDGE of .156.13 PAVEMENT AND CURB I- 58.06 - H JAN 0 6 1999 } n {�V11 Graphk Scale S P 3 City of So. Burlingl Feet $ : 30 0 30 60 90 120 _ END D<E%1SPNG SIDEWALK PROPOSED 3• 7` (-.� l \ 1.. �i i -_ - ECB ESMH ECB r EXISTING j �•, ., �\ _ _ ` �Sn)RM-109.J0 - \ I 1 I r-IB I.16 r.184.29 r-f85.61 WATER CONCRETE , "��, �--� ../� ��, /� T�� 1-f75.80-Il].49-182.54 WeLVE SIDEWALK 1 \ �i '��\ �.\ \ \\ \ \/�� WA IP.211.20 ESMH \ \ \ PRDP,OSED.NTDRANT \ I I 1 �7 PCB ' ECB \\ ' \ \ PC VgILE, BURY PROPOSED (I I T-1BI,S1 r-187.T4� \ 1 ITCONNECT T01, I \ \ \ CL V:-20B.03 -CLE,1NOUi III I Ll-209.93 2 \ I 1-177. ]5 EXISTING 8' \ \ \ f 1T� I \ 1-180.8 / \ ! I y-209.88 \ I CASWATER 1-19240 SEWERt19�•Q \ SEWER-207.72 I I I \ -- -- ` VALVES i I / CONNECT TO )PROPOSED STORAl.19 . / ��AAA I I I ". PR SED 4 TER e '.' ------ -- ----- .� CLEANWi i-193.88 1' 7-- WATER-711,10 I I \ ' I 1 EXISTING 8'� I I I i�)/ VALVE¢ EWER-2�.0 3(94 \ IDX DRIVE- + ------ `.8 PVC \ ( / \ CAP a THRUST 1 \ lb' e' PVC SD JS l 1 7 . BLOCK a POST t `' ;\ \\\_ \ \ I I 19-•fe' PVC R J5 8 7 _ P SED \ \ ` \\ - \ I I • \„ N �\ \\ CAP a AY RKER \ ECB END OF j \ \\ \ j 11 I PSMH� \ POST \\ \ \ r-18f.56 75,80 EXISTING l7- ` _--___-__- _,r___--18- PVC STB EXISSEPNG _.PCB \ IB l._� OS 1 \ \ t 1 PCB I '' I %ISPNG 18\ OAM. NfR j�119 RIB j \ \ \\ \\ \�ryI 89/1 oA\\ 1.215 0 Ji UILDIN I 12 START OF NEW AAMRR 51 `\ \ •. MAIN \ \ \\CHAIN LINK - f ,\. �' i ``': �� ' i I.. `•. \ \ \ I l 1 1 1. \ \ PENCE 23C 22C 21C 20C 79C W E e r"r m ISO a `o DATUM ELEV 175.00 m N <0� -- 100 VERTICAL CUFYE --- g PN STAI- 5+50 PW ELEV . 219.50 AD. - -4.V N 21A h & EXISTING - GROUND b Y PROPOSED CONCRETE GRADE FOUNDATION _ PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED O CLEANOUT �1 4' DEPTH TYP. PW STA . 1+50 Pw ELEV - 788.82 '' .• A.O. - 117 ?ICJ - -- 150' VERTICAL CURVE -- -- • � M / P�` 95 - P10NY'T0'Pi A PROPOSED -\ CLEANOUT K \ 5\ l a PROPOSED M1M1V' < o GRADE o W EXISTING 8 N_ S 5 GROUND �1N O EXISTING a CLEANOUT 0 / wh ` II - A. _ II'.'' ' I I SEWER MAIN STUB STA 2+08 CONNECT x AA I ' ' ' TO EXISTING CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY S n -" GAS LINE, ' S TORM SEWER STUB UTILITY STUB INVERTS AND ,S1 I ' STA 2+20 CONNECT CONTACT ENGINEER PRIOR ' ' LVY WA IER VALVE TO EXISTING I To ROAD CGNs TRUCPON WATER MAIN STUB TA 2+00 CONN CT TO EXISnNO 4' (%' r 8' WATER D.I. WATER CROSSING 2 Y o $ EXISTING PROPOSED 9 EXISnMG e' w C ELEVATION ELEVATION D.I. "TER N,NiT o0b Ihµ t\n a1� N1Nj Q� � N� W� O� of 43 C OOR PROPOSED CLEANOUT 75' rS' PVC ��\ -0.041 CAP END OF WATER MAIN LAP END OP STORM 1-212.96 CAP END OF \ SEWER 1-212.03 PROPOSED WATER VALVE JAB! 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington Graphic Scala -------� Feet 40 O 40 80 120 t6O W 0 N t • ry t y w 3 9 M j �3t2 U4 w 0 yf �r i� VZ J W F— N J C4 ZI V7W DEZZ ~ou Z W FINAL $ o 00 0) rn a Z O 2 w z _O Vl z LAJ X oW Z W J m 2 ■ , h P1 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 CAP, THRUST BLOCK DI h MARKER POST PROPOSED --- CLEANOUT ` 1 ® PCB .216.93 .20111 1.209.68 - pePROPOSED i WATER VALVES--� e P1.21ROPO1111.0, pT CLEANOUt / / DDD T MROPOSEO--- / 01 a'°AAN / / ePROPOSED 5 \' D. CONCRETE \ SDEWALX \ \ \ \� / CAP AND EXISnNG - /'� MARKER BUILOfNC CHAIN LINE( -1 POST - FENCE -21858 i.110.0 PCB r.115.35 DI i-210.68 ZH 18.BI / PCB SAW CUT EXIST1NG PAVEMENT,, r.215.J5 AT STA 1.15 START NEW _ 1.211.54 DI PA1£ME=i AT STA /�/5 1 EXISRNC MTC PIL — GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE --4' PVC UNOERDRAIN 1 CLASS 2 WA D.I. CU55 52 WATER MARL EXISnNf. 8" A R MAIN EXIS71NG T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 8 _ __I[XISnNC 8" MAIN PROPOSED - CLEANOUT STORM GRAIN ` -' •� \ s.0.005' PCB ,- \ 2I6 JJ -217.25 I � i-1101I r i V\, - '_,.__.. _ \ __ `_-_ '_ - \I) gj2Q.2)11./la^`` -• _.___� /'J<7L TER .20 STORM:; 09.30 01D / 197.9 \ 1 I \ \ 211, LOW PUNT ELEV . 215.74 -F LOW PUNT STA . 2+73.39 PM STA . JUDO PW ELEV 215.55 100'ER AL CURVE — h {I GG � yNh N `� EXISnNG CFOUND m PROPOSED OR No - - — 4" PERFORATED PVC UNDERORAIN II 205-15 STORM RAIN a J. CLASS 52 WATER MAIN 8" AC. WATER MAIN _________ .: __......_....-._......._.._._._........_... �_ .................. ----"---- g O ADAPT TO 8" ----_ B' h D.I. USRIC DRESSER A.C. SEWER H W TYPE COUPLING v�0 8pc ' ' a nihG n ry N N N N h N b h •-V!t* k L JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington Graphk Scale Fast 40 0 40 b 120 160 � N C H t m W Ya :z w U O Y 1 uz �z— w F Vf f`-� 7V1W ne zZ ~ Ol7 Z w tf. 0T VER 1P *ay, NO. W91�F FINAL 0 0 00 1"- O X Z ui > W Z_ Q h— z Z 7 G K ' Op Z W ■ �0 W P2 --- a' WATER' CAS, IN Cow. - - WATERL FINISHED GRACE - SLIDING VALVE BOX -----T' OPERATING NUr B' MINIMUM -- TURNCLOCKWISE COUNTER CL0.^KMSE i0 ,PAIN GATE VALVE AWWA GATE VALK L-500 MECHANICAL JOINT C lNNECTGN 4 MX MYETNNTLENE BEFREEN VALK AND CONCRETE VALK ANCHOR - 5 C.f. CLASS D CONCRETE, / 1 BARS AROUND VALK ATTACHED TO CONCRETE NOTE: REFER TO WOIMDUAL TOWN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER. TYPICAL GATE VALVE USE CLASS 0 (2500 PSI) CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOCKS. PLACE 4 MIL. POYEMYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND MRUST BLOCK, PLACE THRUST BLOCK AGAINST UNDISTURBED WENCH WALL - CONCRETE BEARING AREA ON FITTING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 7/2 SQUARE FOOT THRUST BLOCKS BASED OIN' 2W IPSI WORKING PRESSURE PLUS SURGE ALLOWANCE OF 100 M. TTT ]j ooffmw 9'O TEE E2RELROW J![EDOw al -EMEND B' INt0 CAP W/ MACH. JONt MEHCH WALL NOTE FOR REDUCERS, PROVTOE �'' TRENCH WALL TOPICAL BARING AREA FOR ME SOIL PE BASED ON ." POUNDS UNDISURBED SOX. FOIN 5IEACH 2 INCH REDUCTION _ - - ,YPICAI GP REDIECER SAFE BEARING 3 h I" !' B" t0' 12' SOIL YPE LOAD LBS/FT• 15' DO' 15' 22.1' . 90 15' 22.5' m 90' 15' 22 S' CLAY TOoo 5.0 TD 1.0 7.0 10.! ri.E B.0 I,0 Ifl0 a5.0 14.0 )0 2E JB,O 2L0 IO.a 390 55.0 30.0 iS0 SAND GRAKI 2" SOOo 2.5 2.0 3.5 T.1 2.0 f.! 1.0 f.0 3.!1.0 SD 1.0 a0 f.5 90 B.O ISO fl1 ).0 10 3.5 2.3 140 9.0 I9,0 125 100 TO 3.0 A.5 ;0.0 3.0 2).5 rfl5 IS.O ro.0 8.0 SO nu SHALE 4000 low 1.5 o.5 as l.o +.o o.3 as 0.5 3.0 I'D Lo t5 a.o L0 Lo 0.5 s 2.0 es 15 xs 1.3 a.o to zo 3.0 9s 15 ao Lo 2a Lp fo.o A.0 u.o 5.5 zs a0 +.o I.S rS, WATER MAIN THRUST BLOCKS N.TS PLUG DRAIN IF BELOW WATER TABLE DO NOT COKR DRAW PORT WTH CONCRETE �7 1 FIRE PROTECTION HYDRANT A. PRIM M BEING PUT INTO SERNCE. WATER MAINS SHALL BE DISINFECTED ACCORDING TO AWWA SPECIFICATION c-651. B. ME NEW LINE MALL BE FLUSHED AT A VELOCITY GF NOT LESS MAN 2.5 FEET PER SECOND (OPEN 2-112 INCH HYDRANT CONNECT70 FLUSH FOR A PERIOD DETERMINED BY ME ENGINEER FOR ME LENGTH OF MAW M BE DISINFEC iD C. CHLORINATION $HALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY INTRODUCING A HYPOCHLORIIE SOLUTION RIM A GONCENMATION OF GREATER MAN So PARTS PER MILLION OP AWIK, BLE CHLORINE. D. USING A NOZZLE AT EACH END HYDRANT, CONTROL ME RATE DF FLOW INTO ME NEW MAIN AND PROPDRRONALLY FEED ME HYPOCHLORIFE SCLUMW INTO ME MAIN. AFTER ME CHLORINE HAS REACHED ALL POINTS IN ME SYSTEM. CLOSE THE VALVE SUPPLYING WATER FROM THE EIIISTNG MAIN AND THE END HYDRANTS. MAINTAW ME HEAWLY CHLORINATED WATER IN ME MAIN FOR 24 HOURS DURING WWCH TIME ALL MAIN LINE VALVES SHOULD BE OPERATED. AFTER 24 HOURS ME MINIMUM CHLORINE RESIDUAL MUST BE AT LEAST 50 PARTS PER MILLION. E. FLUSH NEAWY CHLORINATED WATER FROM THE LWE AND REFILL THE LINE FOR SERNCE. TAKE AND I�BNIT TWO BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES OF ME WATER TD THE STATE OP KRMOT IF THE RESULTS v, H 019'NFECTION PROCEDURE WLL BE REPEATED U- SFACTORY III— ARE OBTAINED, r31 DISINFECTION OF WATER MAINS - nNISHEO r,RAnT --SLICING VALK BOX _ . - AND LID .--a ]� --I MINIMUM _ CALN TYPE TAPPING SLEEK OKR EXISTING WATER MAIN r'�,i--TAPPING VALK < M" POYE MYLENE BETWEEN VALK AND CONCRETE ANCHOk 5 CF CLA55 0 CONCRETE MM I A BARS ATTACHED TO CONCRETE I I - CLASS D CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK $A BEARING AREA ON UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE PROIAX HYDRANT REFLECTOR FLAG 3 WAY HYDRANT, AWWA C-502 ROTATE HYDRANT BODY FOR PROPER ALIGNMENT AS DIRECTED BY TOWN WATER SUPERINTENDENT. BURY LANE ELEVATION MARK FINISHED GRADE SLIDING VALK BOX AND LID PLACE 213 C.Y. CRUSHED STONE BELOW DRAIN PORT THRUST BLOCK CLASS D CONCRETE 9.0 SO.. FT BEARING AREA VALK ANCHOR, 5 C.F. CLASS D CONCRETE USE IF 4 BARS TO ANCHOR VALK TO CONCRETE X.Y iAfONT NMRANT ME ANNA C-111 USE 1 NIL POYF-ENE BETWEEN ALL FITTINGS AND COINCREIE UNDISURBED SOL THRUST BLOCK CLASS 0 CONCRETE 10.0 SO FT BEARING AREA 30 SIWVEL I NNT HYDRANT CONNECTION (IF SNIKL JOINT CONNECTOR IS NOT USED, THEN ADD 314- ROD ANC LUGS) N =GpN��i0�!�•%��iN y III'0. •��i..ili: HIE yT .il CKINN".�!,�vhf, I 1= III II-�,O Op,��p�q�lll INN II . III _ NI'_NI1�-1111-Ii11-1111 0 TESTING WATER MAINS A. AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LAID AND ] DAYS AFTER TINE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS AMC gNCHORS HAVE BEEN PLACED. ME WATER MAIN SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED ACCORDING TO PWWA SPECIFICATION C-6-93. B. CONIRACTOP $HALL SUPPLY ALL NECESSARY APPARATUS TG PERFORM ME HTDROSTATIC TEST C. TEST PRESSURE SHALL BE 720 2S711EP�-PER SQVAR[., INCH OR13L3 DMES THE MORKING PRESSURE MEASURED AT OR NEAR TH HIGH POINT IN ME SYSTEN, WHICHE A IS GREATER. TEST SHALL BE A AWNUM OF T NOURS IN DURATION AND ME TEST PRESSURE SHALL NOT VARY MORE MAN 3 PS FOR ME DURATION OF THE TEST. D. ME PROJECT ENGINEER AND THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BE CONTACTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TESTING E ALL VALKS SHOULD BE WINFED AS BEING OPEN OR CLOSED AS APPROPRIAIE FOR THE PORTION OF THE WARR MAW BEING TESTED. F. ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE SHALL BE COMPUTED BY ME FORMULA: Q.(S F D I, P)1133,200 WHERE 0 IS LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR, S IS THE LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED IN FEET, D IS THE NOWNAL DIAMETER OF THE PIPE IN INCHES AND P IS THE SQUARE ROOT OF ME AWRACE TEST PRESSURE N POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH DURING THE TEST G. REPLACE AND RETEST ANY WORK -NO TO BE DEFECTIK. TESRNG HYDRANTS A. AFTER TESTING ME WATER MAINS, OPEN ME HYDRANT FULLY AND FILL WITH WATER, TO PREKNT CAPS FROM BEING BLOW OFF, VENT AIR FROM ONE OF ME CAPS WHILE IT IS BEING FILLED. WHEN ALL ME AIR HAS ESCAPED, TIGHTEN ME CAP, B. ALLOW THE PRESSURE TO BIRD UP TO MAW LOPE PRESSURE AND CHECK FOR LEAKAGE Al FLANGES, NOZZLES AND ME OPERATING STEM. C. CLOSE ME HYDRANT, REMOK ME NOZZLE CAP AND PLACE ME PALM OF YOUR HAND OKR WE OPENING. DRAINAGE SHOULD CREATE A NOTICEABLE SUCTION. 4 \TESTING WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS L J 1[ R. �W.3 _ . M.:M.✓' JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington p D H 0 • h Y . � % •W L. AP N)AR� R wN uQ UQ O U WR i3 z u �Z- W r- vi Q � W �ZZ ~00 W OF VEa •A � 3��,Yh* �. �9151EROI r �T OPAL E� FINAL g O $ 3 Lr) n 0 Go a - Z O 'o w t V. (D o m L 0 3 D1 L -cRWT FRAME To a INCHES FROII TOP BRICK ADA/SRNG CI Cw MANIARI �INLNf r ydI MAN/NUM DIAMETER PIPE RCP.CSP.CAAPPEP a" PVL h a.MELDED FABRIC ,I OR AS REWIRED TO 4AINTAIN m A STRUCTURAL INIFGRIry / —/I BARS. 6.Oc BOTH WAn OR AS REDUIRED ro Yux ran — aA sTRUL TARAL INTEGRITY T tea' 6RA IEL 1OR su9-BASE OR AS REWIRED BY ENGINEER 11 KET OR UNSTABLE CONCIDWS EXIST T UNDISNRBCD ROIL %!1 TYPE -B' CATCH BASIN /r - 1-D• '� LAST IN COVER DRAIN CAST IRON VALVE BOX OR ASS VALVE BOX WITH CAST IRON COLLAR I' PM: SUN SS RISER a' PVL SDR 35 45' ELBOW I'AI'AI' PM SOR 35 IS' WYC I• IMF PVC DRAIN, IDA 55 r5"N TYPICAL CLEANOUT r WT. CONTACT EWIXECR EN a' COVER CANNOT BE MAMI.— FlNISHED ROAD GRADE CO —TEDBACKZLIIIiI (S 9SR DfNS TY (STANDARD PFOCTOR) 6• SAND BEDDING -- OVER TOP Of PRY --STORM DRUM UNE 3 ' _ I 5/A' HARD s,ONE m $PRWGLINE DI, PWE a }�. NoTIRE S. REOUIrc �V.° 111 4 MATERIAL _ _..��—UNDISTURBED I=:III;-I I.IlI i ill l i SOIL t 21 TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH_o- NOTE: UNDE16)RAR+ A,LL BE INWCATED By THE CITY OR PROJECT ENO M AS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE. 1—BINMINdIS PAKMENT SEED AND MULLH ` - 6 T sIX, 3" CPUSH/ILCR�RUN e Cxoa IS•GRRAVVELFU Nn 4y 9 �%ee 9 P55 ITE C B CONCRETE V B --NEAW r p3 FIANCE INLET FRAMEDRA1E, R- NEENAH R-SIDSB OR LCBARW LFTIB-T - _ "�•-- GAI FRAME TO I INCHES FROM ,CP d ----`+ �---' NRICK AausING —A— MUM COIIRSEs r' �` ,I• MAAJAAA - 12 INCHES �1. a -�- --LADDER RDNGS O ,T' O.C. i I r ..�. f DIAMETCR SEE TABLE ----_--_ WENDED W,RE FABRIC (6 x 6 W1W) �• STRUCTryR.RRE TO YYAINIAl �I yy I I x 1. i --/a BARS 6. O.C., BOTH WAYS I A`__... L •��'_~� ss.uciFAWI.IRXIEDE(R IYAINTAIN 71" GRAVR FOR SUB -BASF Y '1.•. LM 'Yf ad6 e� �� OR SAS WYUOR UNSTABLERE BY EER COHDI — r.sr ��-- --UNDISTURBED SOIL r771 TYPE -D" CATCH BASIN 1/2• - •_D- N. INSIDE 11•PE 1B TW DI Ia' 4-2-1 0TI 9 B' S' DS 60' T' b' B' B' e- DB Tr 5.• Ie• e• ,r r DO 9B• 60• $I' 1T" IT' B' ✓<S JAI' 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington m D N. INSIDE 11•PE 1B TW DI Ia' 4-2-1 0TI 9 B' S' DS 60' T' b' B' B' e- DB Tr 5.• Ie• e• ,r r DO 9B• 60• $I' 1T" IT' B' ✓<S JAI' 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington m D ✓<S JAI' 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington Hnv OR STRAW BALE INLET ORATE BUT, BALES TOGETHER TO FORM A 11GHT "1 I.. I' . J' HARDWD00 STAKES TO ANCHOR BALES FIRMLY M GROAND CONSTRUCDW SPECIFICATIONS Ali 1.) NAY BALES sm— CONSIST OF MOWED AND PROPERLY OARED CRASS, STRAW, OR LEOUME MOWNC$, REASONABLY FREE GE WEEDS, TWo$, DEBRIS OR OTHER o CTGN— MATERIAl, THE BALES SHALL SE .— ON TONNE IN NEAT BALES COMMONLY PROD[UCED BY BALERS 2) GRATiER A. NSBAASLN ISIN FABRIC (MIRAYI 40) OVER ME FRAME. AND MEN SET CR4TE BACK 10 PLACE. J.) HAY BALES SHALL BE PLACED AROUND ALL INLETS NOTED ON ME SITE PLAN. 4.) INSPECTION SHALL BE FREWENT (MINIMUM ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EMERY RAINFALL) AND REPAIR AND REPLACENENT of INLET PROrCCTION SHALL BE MADE PROMVTLY (WHIN ME SAME DAY) AS NEEDED S.) UPON — S �I TOW OF ME APER IPSTREAA THE 11ME PRoiECMW SHAL, BE RENOWO, UPON APPROVAL OF ME ENGINEER. INLET PROTECTION SECURE HAMALES AS OUINED M N DETAIL CUTLT EMBANKMENT ��--- EROSION LOY.OL BLANKET SEED AND MULCH IN ACCORDANCE SPEWFICA DONS I m CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FDA SLOPE STASILI— ON ALL ROPES EROSION COA-M BLANKET I EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SHALL BE MANUFACTURED STRAW OR COCONUT FIBERS THE BLANKET SHALL BC COWRFD WTH A PHOTGKlECRADARE EXTRUDED PLASMIC MESH, ME BLANKETS SHALL BE FURNISHED IN POLLS AN$ SHALL BE EWAL TO ERCSKM OCNraO BLANKETS MANUFACTURED BY BON TERRA AMERICA OR NOtM AMERICAN GREEN. 2, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OF MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL REGRADED SLOPES AS DESIGNATED ON ME SITE PLAN J. AFTER ROPES HAW BEEN GRADED REASONABLY CLOSE TO FINAL GRADES LIME. FERRUZER, AND TOPSOR HAS BEEN COMPLETED. ME EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SMALL BE LAPPED 6 INCHES AT ME SEAMS AND ANCHORED AT THE TOE AND TOP OF ROPES BURY ME BLANKET 6 INCHES DEEP AT ME TM OF ROPE, AND COWR TO WIN PSOL. STAKE OR STAPLE ME BLANKETS AT A FEET ON CENTER BON WAYS OWN ME ENTIRE SLOPE. 1'41 SLOPE STABILIZATION (MINIM FNNROFENCE. OR ARPAOWD ))EACH $IORrTCANI PRECIPTATIOV E NT.91T UNCE SHALL BE INSPECTED Y, AND AFTER EWAL MAY BE S esmrFD.) MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' --fIL1ER FABRIC. OR MOWN WRE FABRIC DEVELOP 1N ME SRT FENCE. - - _WOODEN OR METAL STAKE A)SROKEN STAKES SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. (MAX. 10' O.C.) ----KEY FABRIC 1N. GROUND (AN. c Flow CWSTRLK'TED-IN-auF - CONSTRUCTION SPECInCARONS SILT FENCE SHALL BE EIMER PREFAMCAMI) EN C L (MIRAFI EN—GE. OR EWAL)L OR CONSTRUCTED -IN -PLACE, S SPECIFIED HEREIN. R1rr.m .fd?FB nL�ly 1)F NT SHALL o INSTALLED PARALLEL AL OAKLAND CONTOURS AE M FABRIC SIDE SHALL FACE UPSTREAM; MESH AND STARES SMALL FACE 1--Al,RRE 2) NLN SHALL BE E%CAVATED MINWUM 6 INCHES ITEPONI UPSTREA4 SWE OE FENCE LINE. E%CE5S FI AP CE DATER FABRIC'WNIMUM B INCHES) SHALL BE PLACED ANO TRENCH. RENON SHALL Be 0ACMIS RRAN AND E IN SED .—ADENCGAGTRUCnW 1N MIS MANNER PREWNTS SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF FROM FLOWNC UNDER SN.1 FENCE. 1f FENCE CENTER. POSTS SNAT ALL DFE LL SE DRIVEN ROWAN 21 BELOW GRADE FENCE SHALL SE POSITIONED AS SHOWN. P ALUL TO THE GROUND CONTOURS. 2)TRENCH, SHALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM 6 RWNES DEEP DN UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LINO. J)AOWN WRE FABRIC (14 GA., 6 INCH MAIL MESH OPENING) SHALL BE STAPLED M FASTENED SECURELY ON WRE TIES To UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE POSTS. WOVEN WRE FABRIC SHALL EXTEND MINIMUM M OUCHES ABOW GRADE 4)FILTE'R FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOWN WRE FABRIC WIN WRE TIES, SPACED EWRY 24 M CHES, AT TOR AND NO- SIE DOM OF FENCE. MINIMUM B INCH FLAP Of FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE, AND BACKFILLED. 5)WHEN TWO SECTONS Or FABRIC MS,FR' THE, SHLL BE o IARRED BY I � AND STARTLED. 6)SKT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY, AND AFTER EACH SIGNIFICANT PRECIPITATION EVENT. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. AND SEGMENT REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' DEELOP IN SILT FENCE l L A SILT FENCE v2• . T-oA, RIP- HAP SHALL BE A WELL GRADED RCCK MIXTURE DOWN TO 1 INCH SIZE OARTICIES SUCH THAT BIG PERCENT OF ME MIXURE BY IWIGHt $HALL BE LARGER MAN ME LEAST DIMENSION. TYPE SIZE (INCHES) LEAST DIMENSION R-204 1-3 2 2 4 2 2- B f2 J-SIB fe J-Bo ao A WELL GRADED ROCK MIXURE SHALL BE DEFINED AS A IOXWE GLWPOSEO PRMAINLY OF ME LARGER STORE SIZES. BUT WITH A SUFFICIENT WKTUM Of OMER SIZES TO FILL THE PROGRESSWLY SMALLER WADS BETWEEN STONES STONf FLW RIP -RAP SNARL BE APPROWD, POAGH, BROKEN, MARRY STONE WITH IRREGULAR FACES PER- MITTING PLACEMENT IN A MINT INIERLOCKMG MANNER WM THE SMALLER STORES FILLING WIGS BETWEEN LARGER STONES. ME STONES SHALL BE HARD, SOUND, RESISTANT TO WATER ACTION, WEATHERING, AND SWTABle FOR, THE PURPOSE INTENDED. 5 RIP RAP NOTES --' — --- 4' VERTICAL FACE _ ( Ir ).._ ANUS — STAKE TOWARD m TIT PRENOL/AY LAID NAY E EMBEDDiNG DETAIL ,T 2 RE -BARS, S,EEL PICKETS. OR 2.2- / /' --- WOOD STAKES 1 1/2' TO 2- IN GROND WRE ON NYLON BWNo HAYSALES PLACED ON ME CONTOUR ANCHORING DETAIL 3 HAYBALE DIKE NO To SCALE AFTER ME FINISHED GRAGE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ME aRPUZER SPREAD, PLANT THE SPECIFIED SEED W%ILOE AT A RAZE OF A POUNDS PER T000 SWARE FEET AND WORK MAY INTO ME SOIL. ARRY $EED W ME PREPARED SEED BEO WIN APPROWD MECHANICAL SEEGERS OR HYDRGREFDMG COUPMEN, UPON `OMRLE DON POLL THE ASOW PLANTING OPERATIONS, PL ALL AREAS WITH A WATER PLEO GARDEN RULER, LEAMNO THE SURFACE Of ALL AREAS TRUE TO GRADE. SMOOTH, AND FREE FROM HOLLOWS QP OTHER IRREGLAARITIES MO MONDY WATER ALL NEWLY PLANTED LAWNS IMMEDIATELY AFTER —TING, USING A FINE SPRAY. PROTECT BANKS AND SWALES AND PREWNT GO MPAR EROSION MAT OCCUPS. BANKS SWALES CR OTHER GRADED AREAS MAT HAW BEEN LASHED OUT OR HAW BECOME DAMAGED SHALL BE REPAIRED NMEDIATELY. UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY ME ENGINEER TO PLANT OFF SEASON SEEDING WILL BE CONDUCTED DAY DURING ME PERIOD FROM APRIL IS TD .GENE 1 OR AUGUST 13 TO WTOBER IS. 50 AS NOT TO CAUSE INTERFERENCE, NO SEEDING IS To PROCEED BEFORE OMER PHASES OR ME WORK HAS PROGRESSED SUFF(CIENTLY. SEED SHALL BE FRESH, CLEAN, NEW SEED. SEED WHICH HAS BECOME WET AND/OR MOLDY MILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. ME POLLOMO SEED I-PLAW $HALL BE USED; CREEPING RED FESCUE .#-M SS KENNCNY BLUEGRASS JO-M BO PERCNNWM RYE 25-M 90 RED TOP 0-5 85 WRTE CLOWN 0-5 - r61 SEEDING FIR CONSTRUCTION_-SPECIFICATIOM FOR TEMPORARY �" _t—} I II I r STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP I., PW TIRE SEDIMENT TRAP SHALL BE CWSTRUCIEO BY ExCAYA TMG A 1EMPORARY BARN ADJACENT 1F6' . C%ISTINC l 1 I / TO THE EASIING CATCH BASIN, ME TRAP SHALL HAW A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO FEET MEARATI) FROM THE CA TM BASIN GRATE. WT ROPES SHALL BE J:1 OR GETTER AND 15' PW SIGN N, 'iB2 ( STABILIZED WM SON TERRA OR EWAL TO PREWNT ERDSION. I.te4J4 Y-_--CUP �L r, l.WRET PROTECTION SHALL BE PRONGED BY MBTALLING ALTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 14ON) OWR ME FRAME AND MEN RTTTNG GRATE BACK IN PLACE. IT ).THE STRLIGME SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAM EWNT AND REPAIRS MADE AS 162 `N� I NEEDED, SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOWd FROM ME TRAP WHEN THE MATERIAL HAS ALWMULATED j TO WMIN 4' OF ME MLEI. SEDIMENT SHALL BE SPREAD OWR STABILIZED AREAS ON J.I SIM i. iB0.A9 % \ ROPES LESS THAN 49 AND IF NECESSARY, SEEDED WM GRASS TO PREWNT EAGS IN I ` ROPES 4.IA TEMPORARY BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED AS SHOWN ON $PJ INTO THE PERMANENT POND, PRgIP to PANNG ME 511E --IB4 1S2 EXIsTMG CB EXIS.R B- - W: RA _ - 6F 1 _ ____r i I.ISB. __ __ ---------- _______------- ` MLWOSED e'O.r. - IB' RCP GLASS 32 WATER .15B.M —�� ARAM 68 1.138,M .V I� `., "' h159.M CAPPED GAS EXISTING POKER SEPIA POLE (TYR) '' r ARPED sERNCE \._ I f62_-- -----_—'�______-------____- s—� ----------------=k--tom.-...............—�.— — — — __------ ----------------- ----- --- -- cAPPEO WATER MxRnNC CnsnNG s' EMSBNC II' VY y SERMCY HYDRANT EXSTING YNFR GAS YAM LATER EXCAVATE TEMPORARY BASIN PROPOSED MANHOLE AND STASILIZEBOTRMI AND TAPPING SIDE ROPES WM BON TERRA AIW SrB OR EWAL g TEMPORARY SEDIMENT POND W MuOEII CONSUL RAG fb01NC[A$ MNM'0 13 IABe A. GENERAL: UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WMIN THE LIMITS OF GRADING. INCLUDING ADJACENT MANSIIION AREAS. SAIWM FINISHED SURFACES OTHIN ME SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, COMPACT WM UWFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WM:RE EIEVAOMS ARE INDICATED, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EMSTING GRADES B. GRADING OUTSIM WILDNO ONES: LRAM AREAS ADJAGENl TO BUILDING LINES TO DRAIN AWAY MOM ME STRUCNRES AND TO PREVENT POND1. FINISH SURFACES FREE FROM IRREWLAIR SURFACE CHANGES. AND AS FOLLOWS: 1. LAWN OR UNPAWD AREAS: FINISH AREAS THAT ARE TO RECETW TOPSOIL TO OMAN 0.10 FEET AB ME OR BELOW ME REWRED SUBGRADE —RUNS, LAWNS SHALL BE GRADED SO MAT NO PONDING OCCURS ME GRADING OF LAWNS MILL BE UNACCEPTABLE IF PONOMG OCCURS. 2. WALKS: SHAPE ME SURFACE OF AREAS UNDER WALKS TO ONE. GARDE AND CROSS-SECTION. WIN FINISH SURFACES NOT MORE MAN 0.10 FEET ABO W OR BELOW ME REOVIREO SUBOtA T ELEVATION. J. PAVEMENTS. SHAPE ME SLMIFACE Of AREAS UNDER PAWMENTS TO LINE, GRADE AND CROSS- SECTION. WTH ME FINISH SURFACE NOT NOT MAN DID FEET ABOW OR BELOW THE REWIRED SUBOLADE ELE—ION, PAWMEIS MUST GRAIN SOT AT NO WATER PGWo NG OCCURS IF DINGIT PONTHE PAWNCWILL C GRADING SURFACE of FILL UNDER BUILDING SLABS: GRAM SMOOTH AND EWN, FREE OF PODS AND COMPACT AS SPECIFIED TO ME REWIRED ELEVATION. PROYDE FMAL GRAMS WIAN A TOLERANCE O 1/2 INCH WHEN TESTED WM A 10 FONT STRAIOITFOGE GRADING Y L .: 6.w% JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington M C N Pd. ♦` IN S � � W TAR/ R? i 3 N UY y0 r2 T3 u< O O �e 4 VZ _j Z W J N OC wzz ~OV Z W 4P1C OF LAN"YO *qyR No. 3091 Y f )RJAL FINAL g 04 N N 4 O b 00 f Z 0 CIO > (n C _O d O c C f O o, U "m N L A Ld D3 To' MN, INOUS 1 5' RESNDENTIAL MASS B CONf CTE CURB ---\ 1 6 MM COMP CM0 DRAVE1 BENEATI /2'/r 3' rOPsrnL "14"l� ,t��'�25:i�Y NOES. I. BASE COURSE TO BE PLACED FIRST TEAR. ENISN COURSE TO BE PLACED SECOND YEAR . 2. ALL ROAD MATERIAL TO BE APPROVE) BY I U O 14'-8" CON.. IND. 13'-9 RE& A "E', SEVER J TIE PROJECT ENGINEER AND CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. —SANITARY SEWER J ALL U11, MATERIALS (STRUCTURES AND —S) 0 PRO.ECI WARP MAY{ 6" COVER �---- I (5MIN. COVED T OF RIPE BE APPROVED BY ENGNEER AND CITY ENGINEER. 18' RES, 19' COM.• IND. I1.UNDERDRAIN 16' RES., 17' COM.. IND. 1" —S', Tr IV 1 2' BASE YPE IN DOAN• M0. /2' lTWSH TYPE IV 1 /2' BAY TYPE N I 6' CRUSHER PUN GRAVEL A" GRAVEL ,An SODA ROAD STARILIZATION 5• 1' FABRIC OR 6' SAND CVSNIDA SIDEWALN I cMcm 8' NWAStp/P C, 0 GRAVEL --ELECTRIC. CABLE. AND TI:ICPHONE -- 6' UNDEROPAIN PERFORATED PVC. 1' WASHED STONE BACXFLL, YYUPPED IN FILTER FABRIC (16RAi1 I.U) TN UNDEROPANN SYSTEM INTO STDNE BASINS (UNDERDRAIN INSTALLED AS INOKATED BY ENGINEER) 1 SOUTH BURL►NGTON ROAD CROSS SECTION • ��Jl'L'�L.I � ' aIIIk�T I�gII,m,RpIIgIL�lly-.71=ll Iy`I 411-,1 Ilclll 11 11 1� 1 11 Il ll u l• u II u l=II Sr ;IIu'litl 1111 !. 5 LLLLa11��1� 4 ] PAVEMENT. CONCRETE CURB. & SIDEWALK ,•. r-o• BEF'v�� N EOM/ \ REMOVE FXISTMG CVRB 1E110N5 AND FORM NEW DROPPED CURB OR NEW FULL CUPU Y REMOVE FULL SECTIONS AND PROVIDE EXPANSION ANT FILLER A, NEW ENDS \ ' REVEAL SAW 11 Ex11— PAVEMENT 12' FROM END JpNT AND FACE OF CURB J- — PAEMENT PA M. 7 ACCESS CURB CUT - ,'-D" iiy°oLu cwaw,Pc 1.aNLTn. Nl. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT -- J' TOPSCLL -- J' CRUSHER FUN—� IS• BINN RUN- EXISRD GRADE 12' YARES 1'-0' 2 pTpl SNpROER r DON DW stTPPs BOv TERRA 'C2' IN �-`�� prcH OR Eau � $ o I -- n J/A' - 1-t/2' WASHEDIN-FAB.c T HARD StDNE---1� I-- MIRAF, ATICSDO� SrABCCO DA TARING _ ! —INSTALLATION RN ACCORDANCE MM WRAP STONE IN 4YtAFl - _ 1 NANUFAClURERS RECOMMENOATIpJS MTER PCRFplAIET PlL _ _ _ 1— 1 SAND UNDERDRAIN (DEPTH VARIES �- jW-rt�1li SEE SITE PLAN) 2 TYPICAL PARKING LOT DITCH SECfl N T.S. BI NMINWS PAVEMCNI / ---- 2 /z, BASE COURSE ME NIV l�2—• y—(gtpfR I / J' TOPSpL. SEED AND wULCH - „ J' CRUSHER FUN DRAWL Jk.SO J ,5' BANN RUN GRAVEL d) co 11 r 6' SAND CUSNION i MIRAFl 500X ROAD STABIL12ATON FABRIC — TOP OF SUBGPADE TYPICAL PAVED PARKING AREA o --- -- BITUNINWS PAVEMENT - --- EXPANSION . NT MATERIAL 11/2' FINISH ZMV TYPE LV 2 1/2• BASE COURSE TYP` ea B Y REVEAL d�0 1 J• E-- ° o°C �,G � °o 0 � .--CRAM2 CURB 1� � N— }gip-j�J]J }gip U O J' CRUSHER RUN DRAVEL DR PLAN, WN ° 6.d 6 _._ t5' BANN RUN WAVEL .... L, -- LI �1 I -- uIRnFl 50Dx ROAD STABIUTATNN FABRIC L6 PAVEMENT. GRANITE CURB. AND SIDEWALK _ r-a• JAN 0 b 1999 City of So. Burlington PA VLD UNPAVED —Al Ct AREAS I- SLORE FRAME AHD LID NEAVY DUTY FRAME R AD 0 MATCH RDA, GRADE LERARON LC266 OR NEENAH AT — ,DEPTHOFSUBGRApE REFER TO ROAD SECTIONSgill", m n..� OR EQUAL �i4ND ROADWAY MATERIALS6' "�� CRWT FRAME t0 TOP " BF1CN AND ADJUSTING MANHWE NOTES 5COURSES CO RSE DoJ CWFSES. MAXIMUM 5 CWRSEsI. PROMDE SMW iN $.ERIC ECCENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTION N ANSITIONS BETWEENo RTS OF INTERSECTINGPI ES NO SHARP BENDSIF DEANOFMANH: 2 \ LESS MINI 2 FEET FROI �— BUM RUBBER SEAL RIM TO INVERT, iFMIN A RAT DTOPEP WILL BE INSTALLED. IF DEPTH IS T FEET MWE. CDAT ENTIRE OUTSIDE WIN ASPHALT SEALANT TO MEN A CONICAL TOP WILL BE INSTALLED. S 1 I J. FORM INVERT 10 SAME WELDED WIRE FABRIC (6 X 6 WAY) M DIA RADIUSAS MODEST PIPE --------' "�_ .. COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC RUNGS WITH 1/2• GRADE SMfl REINFORCEMENT OR 4 ENGINEER TO APPROVE BACKFILL AROUND STRUCTURE. .r I' EQUAL 8' O.C. TTL I �— USE MANHOLE STUBS FOR ALL PIPES STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP -- (�E B) MMIHOLE BOTTOM II �' SL�RE1TEOP11VEI0 �! I - 1 !-- p BARS 6' O.O. BON WAYS 1Y• GRAVEL FOR SUB -BASE OR AS REWIRED BY ENDINEER CDORO 5 EnS;N$TABLI FLEXIBLE RUBBER BOOT 7,7 _• UNDISTURBED s0L 1 TYPICAL SEWER MANHOLE 112"- I' o' Iwo .sT.— DT .Ave WATER SERMCF---- CROS$INGS SEWERS CROSSING WATER I MAINS SHALL BE LAID BENEATH ME WATER MAIN WON AT LEAST 18 INCHES E VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN ME PT RAN M OUTSIDE 0 THE 147 I E OUTSIDE OF IHC WATER MAIN. WHEN 1 15 IRTTDA'0SE SEPARATION TORAIN THE VERTICAL SEPARATION OR WHERE N 1 E SEWER THUS BE TAD ABOVE NE M _) WATER MAIN: 1) ME CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ONE FULL LENGTH OF SEWER 15 CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW THE WATER LINE WITH SEINER JOINTS AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM WATER JOINTS; 18„ 2) ME SEWER PIPE MUST BE - MIN' CONSTRUCTED TO III MAIN STANDARDS FOR A MIILWM DISTANCE OF 20 FEEI EITHER SIDE OF THE CROSSING OR A mIAL OF THREE PIPE LENGNS. WHICNCVER IS GREATER: !) ME SECTION CONSTRUCTED r0 WATER MAIN STANDARDS MUST BE RESSAM TESTED W MAINTAIN SO PSI FOR 15 MINUTES WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIOR TO BACIIFILLINC BEYOND ONE FOUA To ASSURE - TERr1GHNEss, A) WHERE A INTER MAIN CROSSES ADEOUATE AL WUVGW! SHALL SE�R'BE PROVIDED FOR ME SEWER 1-1----- SEWER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO ME WATER MAIN. 3 WATER / SEWER CROSSING r o` usr aMsm 1MA6o s-TWaMs �Il Iln NIA un=nu •sty �� II SUICK"IL FIRE OF ORDAII. iiPAVED % •% '% ' %`y\ OR FROZEN Of �IIIo IIII�IIII�IIII�L III=IIII=11A�11�1: y0�0��,,��,�0 STANDARD PROCTOR UNDER ROADS OR IIII SURFACES, AND SOX DENSITY ELSEWHERE .. OF ORGANIC OR FRo— MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95. DENSITY t: �:.: :R: IIII—�': '� STANDARD PROCTOR, . Ill II=11n lalll IrMllll„ nnlnul•1=InIII 1111�1 W IIII=IA r•; IINII� V•'.�•► j. 1111111111R. _ Illmnl i� ••� �;. n_un_lul= lil_nn=nu=nnnlllmmTYPICAL SEWER TRENCH A N10 ME BAY OR %.S OF A COWPMETEO I HDLE.TER TEST OR VACUUM TEST IN ANY CASE. THERE SHALL BE BE NO MSIBI.E LEAKAGE B AFTER ME MANHWEHA5 SEE. A IABLED IN PLACE ALL LIFTING HOLES AND THOSE EKTERI W ON nWITHIN B FEE T ON THE GROUND SUR- F F POINTED A AN PR N- H WISE MORTAR. N T ACE SHALL BE FILLED AND WN ED WITH APPROVED W S R C 0 E TES SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO PLACING ME SHELF AND INVERT O THE GROUNDWATER TABLE HAS BEEN PIPES AALLOWED O RISE ABOVE IN BOTTOM OF OL MANHWE, NE ABLYElOGNEERPLUGGED MAY DIRECT E TO BE LOWERED FOR THE DURATION O ME TEST. ALL PIPES AND OVER OPENINGS INTO ME MANHOLE SHALL BE SUITABLY PLUGGED AND THE PLUGS BRACED i0 PREVENT BLOWDUT. C. IF ME CWTRACTW ELECTS TO BACNPU PRIOR IO WATER TESTING. FOR ANY REASON, It SHALL BE AT HIS OWN RIM AND 11 SHALL RE INCUM- BENT UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE REASON FOR ANY FAILURE OF ME TEST. NO ADJUSMENT IN THE LEAKAGE ALLOWANCE HILL BE MADE FOR UNKNOWN CAUSES SUCH AS LEANAOE OF PLUGS, ABSORPTION. ETC, I.C., IT WILL BE ASSUMED MAT ALL LOSS MMAAOLLLFL WATER DURING WSTES'SARv510 ASSURE iN( EEE GNEX" 1NWE WRR U OW MEBOIp/ OF MEE4�NOLE MRg1�0UT TFIE TEST, LAKE ANY STEPS D. M THE CRWNp AIER TABLE 15 ABOVE ME HONEST JOINT IN ME MANHOLE. AND IF MERE 15 NO LEAKAGE INTO THE MANIFDLE A$ DETERMINED BY ME ENGINEER, SUCH A TEST CAN BE USED TO EVALUATE ME WATER TIGHTNESS OF ME MANROOLE HOWEVER, IF THE ENGINEER IS NOT SATISFIED. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL LOWER ME WATER TABLE AND CARRY OUT ME TEST AS DESCRIBED HEREINBEFORE. E. WATER TEST: THE MANHOLE SHALL MEN BE FILLED MIN WATER TO THE OF THE CONE SECTION. A PERIOD OF ONE HOUR WILL BE PERMITTED. TO ALLOW FOR ABSORPNW. AT ME END OF THIS PERIOD. E MANHWE MALL BE PE 1— to ME TOP OF ME CONE, IF NECESSARY, AND THE MEASURING RUE OF AI LEAST 6 HOURS BEGUN. AT THE END OF ME LEST PERIOD, ME WANNOLE SHALL BE REFILLED TO ME TOP OL ME CORE MEASURING ME VOLUME OF WATER WADDED THIS AMOUNT SHALL BE CONVERTED TO A 24 HOUR RATE AND ME LEAKAGE DETERMINED ON ME BASIS OF DEPTH ME LEAKAGE FOR EACH MANHOLE MALL NOT EXCEED ONE GALLON PER VERTICAL FOOT FOR A 24 HOUR PERIOD. REPAIRS BY APPROVED METHODS MAY BE MADE. AS DIRECTED BY ME ENGINEER, TO BRAND ME LEAKAGE WITHIN ALLOWABLE RATE OF WE GALLON PER FOOT PER DAY. IT SHALL BE THE CWTRACRIRS RESPONSIBILITY TO UNCOVER ME MANHWE. AS NECESSARY, AND TO DISASSEMBLE. RECONSTRUCT W REPLACE IT AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE MANHOLE SHALL THER BE RETESTED, 1 VACUUM MST, ME CONTRACTOR MALL NRNISH THE MANHOLE CONE Si VACUUM PUMP, ALL NECESSARY GAUGES NOSES AND EQUIPMENT TO PERFWM ME 'Est G. FILL AL l LIFTING HOLES AND EXMRIW JOINTS WITH APPROVED NON-SIRINIUNL MWTAR AND PLUG ALL OTHER OPENINGS INTO THE MANHOLE TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT. H INSTALL AN NO ATABLE RUBBER RIND ME SIZE OF ME TOP OF ME MANHOLE BY INFLATING ME WINO MOM AM, TO A PRESSURE ADEOUAM TO PREVENT LCANAGF ON AIR BETWEEN ME RING AND ME MANNOE WALL I PUMP ME AR OUT OF ME MANHOLE MROUOR AN OPENING IN THE ZEST PLATE UNTIL A VACUUM Is CREATED INSIDE ME MANHOLE EQUAL TO 10 INCHES OF MERCURY LOSING AN APPROVED VACUUM GAUGE. NEW STOP THE REMOVAL OF AM AND BEGIN THE TEST J. �UTES,UTIE MARROLE N NOT DROP FAILED OW MC TEST AND 1OF 1 SINALL BE REPAR) OR RECONSTTRRUCTED ANIF DMENRETESTED UNTIL IT RAMS. CURS WIMM I ME 2 MINUTE TIME REQUIREMENT INCREASES BY 210 SECONDS FOR EVERY 5 FOOT INCREMENT BELOW A 10 Foot DEPTH. N, BACKFILL AROUND NE MANNOIE AND FORM INVERT UPON SATISFACTORY TEST RESULTS. 4 TESTING MANHOLES Tow wuuu nrMIRMb rwaxrws RrWsrp I: Asb A ITS' TIE CHANTY SEWER BY A PRESSURISED AIR ZEST BETWEEN CWSECUTIM MANHOLES PLUC THE TWO ENDS OF THE PIPE AND CONNECT ME AIR CWTRW EQUIPMENT TO ME TAPPED END. B. SUPPLY AIR SLOWLY TOM PIP UNTIL RAN TA I PRESSURE E E E L E C INN A CONS NFORAT LE 35 PSI THROTTLE ME AIR SUPPLY IR THAT UZ PF R REMAINS P FOR T ESSU E ABOVE J.0 51 O A LEAST !MINUTES TO ALLOW TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION IN PIPE. AVE UI IS TH THE E TOP PRESSURE WI A GAUGE HANNG A RANGE FROM 0 TO 5 Py THE REGULATE SHOULD EAIR HAVE MINIMUM DIVISIONS T F OI PSI OANDMO IAN O ACCURACY OF t- 0.04 PST, REWIATE THE AIR PRESSURE TO PREVENT IT FROM EXCEEDING 50 PSI, C AFTER STABILIZATION, ADJUST PRESSURE TO 3.5 PSI AND SHUT OFF AIR SUPPLY AMEN ME PRESSURE REACHES 3.0 PSI START ME TOP WATCH AN R TIME 1 S D RECORD ME NE T TAKES TO ROACH 2.5 PS. ME TIME REWIRED FOR THE PIPE SIZE MUST BE At LEAST PIPE DIAMETER MINUTES SECONDS PIPE DIAMETER AWN UTES SECONDS 2 !3 6' ! 50 1B" tt 34 8" 5 O6 20" 12 M Y 10" 6) 22!B 21• 13 !0 T D. IF LATERALS ARE INCLUDED IN THE IESBNC. ME AVERAGE OF NE ORES (Us— DIAMETER AND LENGTH) WILL BE CALCALAMD AND NULTPLIED BY J6.2 SECONDS PER INCH DIAMETER t0 OBTAIN ME REWIRED DOOR, E. IF THERE IS DROIND WATER ABOVE THE SEWER LINE ME AIR TEST PRESSURE CURL BE INCREASED BY 0.5 PSI FOR EACH FOOT OF WATER ABOVE ME INTER! OF ME PRE, DIFFERENCES DUE TO AIR TEMPERATURE AND BAROMETRIC PRESSURE WILL BE CWSWENED NEGLWIBLE. F. IF ME TEST TIME IS LESS MAN THAT MOUIRED ON THE ABOVE TABLE ME PRE WILL HAVE FAILED AND ADEQUATE REPAIRS AHD RETESTING WILL BE REQURED. C. FOR B" AND SMALLER PIPES: IF DURING ME 5 MINUTE SATURATION PERIOD, THE PRESSURE DROP IS LE55 MAN 0.5 PSI AFTER ME INITIAL SrMUZATON AND MR HAS NOT BEEN ADDED, ME PRE SECTION UNDERCONG ME TEST SHALL HAVE PASSED. 1 TESTING SEWERS I.,+I I ...r ..rI JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Burlington PLANT LIST SVM Ott SCIfNMC w1ME COMMON F SQF CIXED 16 Aur mbUn PLO wVIE •ID• S-CAL IM i5 ORNN Al 410' S•CAL I61 A11 SI b<»u LIEMAN CMI 31q•1• LAL W GT 33 GkdW UUc,nNR,'9u0wm,Nr' EYLIX 3 'CAL W OT )s Wek»ntiv,'Sh.dmu,w' KNUfT MDNFVLIXUSt •IR'-S•CAL W AS Awr,. SUWMAIf }• —aim Wl. wl•I[IIRCN 16'IE NGT, MI AC 8 II Mn•Iu,tlYw txMMNk SW.dLON I',10'NGTC� W W IA 3 Nw.n, rxik4 119E001f RANETNF • 1R' M S• CAL W EVERGREEN TREES 5YM Qry SCI(—c HAW COMMON NAME SRE COND PA I Pkea.Cm Iq SPRUCE i 1&IO'HGT. HB a abNe y SPRUCE. I'10'NOT 9A1. NE E3 AMTRA Y•10'NGi. •BB DEE DUOUS SHRUBS OTY SCINEUNC HOME CO,dMOx NAMf SQE CWD vC 19 MWw.nuve6, 3»RW NIURMIM JO'36'HOT. W UC SE Nh.rMnOnulwn MROVNVWD WURNUM XI'36'XGI. W EVERGREEN SHRUBS fYM Qry fCIF--N,IAF COMMON HOME 50 COM n 600 » . f. .. RIMHR I.' -}••NOT. W fV 100 E ka Mnmie NOI}M Nx1tlRCMflOFA 11' }.•— IM PERENNIALS AND GROUND COVER Sn. Orc SCIfNMC wME NAME LEE COfEO i50 Ikfun. NOft4C 1YR OlD 144L. IX IW O.n1M,twumome, CMfIOMONEERN I PA 100 1khMn etroslkMldrs CHRRIMAS1fRN Ri 800 Px M1e txmmlu PpCHYSONDM I AR3 fIAT TMNSPLANTED TREES (EXISTING) S'CAL PLANTING , NOTES 1. All nun•n proven 0--1. 1., In uhetluM fM1al be In N<orIII I with ANSI Z.60.1 S»ndnd, for menur.m,m of nvr»ry nmY. }. All p•nt m,»NN.1I M rwr»ry 9rewn U.I., —.1'. ,ulM1ea»tl .M n<.p.a by 1M LMM,up. Arthil,tl. 1 All pl..1 bed, ,hrub, .M Ve. I...11em -II M .ppwed by L.ndw.w A,thit.11 Wi , to I nu.n.Gon. d. All p=, 11111 M 9u.»n».d by th. ConlrMol Iw . pnlod of em Yur 1— d.l. of 1ndp1 al Provi,lonN At-—. .1 11h. mmplmd I."0.0.. by 1M Owl»r. S. Repl.tem•nt pl-1,, , w111 be r.,.I,.d qiw to Fin,l ,1tep1•nte for ., pl.m, wMth .,. mlednp, o,pnifl<,tlem, hive died e1 .r• unM1Mthy or—W-11111, of 11,. V.I. (du. 10 ..u,dv. Dwnin9, di. b.tk w o1M, r —). 6. Th, LI—p, M<hi»N .pplev,l i, r —d It,, .1 pent m,l W wblilMlon, wior 10 d.11very to 'It. W., T. All Mrub,.nd 1»n will M prq.d with 1M ,MN dnkum ' WIIt-pul' Iw .Po,wN .qwU prim to tM II,N wlm.r w„-,..,en (i•. no Ml•r In.n Nw.mb,r 301. •. C. 1. 1.11. Conlrnlor,Mll Mv. IM Gener•I C. or I«.1. ,II wa.lpeum mRiun In .r•n w e.i,�d,<.wa prior 1e <ommemirp •.9 .ne,v,tien. Adlu,lmenU to tree Iw.11em will be w.a wM,. atuiNin tonnk„ „e oe.,W , vmbl•m end wVln pier ,Ite ,pDrw.l by U. L•M,t•p. ArchI1M. I. ConvnI` i, rnpen,iNe ter nrifyin9 wopo»d -I pr.d„ by II. p qr,d• et.ke, iMl»Un9 rW. p1•b. G,.dn d b, ,Porw•d by L-,A,,p, Archi1M prior 1p Drm,Minp. I.. C=., n rupo M. I., NI d,m,9• due to hi, olwem en.ne en mna,xmen ,h.. 11. CMUnlor ,Mil Hend rNw wo,k ,mooNW with nhlinq 9r.d.,. 12. All,hrub, nM t—,h,11 b. ,Netted xM l,9q•d It th. nun.ry by III L,nd,v.P. Arcni»tt. 13. Genn.l tan or N ,npomible ter .0 armion tantrol me.w,n dur11191onnrullen. 14. All di,lUrb.d ,»n ,» la M 1Po ,ailed •nd Ie•d.d, m.0 omerwM mmu»a. IS. Tomell ,MII mmkt el loon (,I"" elq,nk I— I wlln , PII v.lw Imm S.S to T. ,M Ir•. of relax, wbwR wum or amu m,lai,l d.le»ileu, to pl•nU w lawn PeMF. Le,m fMll L,ndu,pDConvM�w, .Mire UDw,torY. ,1 .dai1WM required for wowr I. ,Intl pl— 9—h.• I6. M.Ilh ,MII 1-11 of doubl—I.—d hxeweed mulch m pp—. Ile L.M,t.p• ConV.tlm i, rnpm,iN. ftI Wwidinq ,e1rp n of loam end _ lit L �pj LrM r ��Y ✓ LEGEND 'JAN 0 6 1999 ODUSTING TM o TRANEPMAEDEX6Tl�gTr of So. Burlington OPRDEOSEDTREE �� sNRfn EED 10-g 123.% 1233X1 I it Ifill I 41 fill HOW > A I I ; ---o 11 ! , f > - II '1 a. 1 A f,!!;- c fill (71 0 - > tt I E W L—L--m GPx X.K E 1 7 H W A C a �,,A,. rm wa 1/5/N .=50. 0 0 W TRUDELL Ca H K S"E L N N VERMONT WGW HIM CA CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC 'no PRELIMINARY LIGHTING -PLAN 98704 I T.O. ROOF CURB EL. 244.66' BLDG. STN FLR.__ _ EL. 232.32' BLDG. 4TN FLR. EL. 220.49' BLDG. 3RD FLR. EL. 208,66' BLDG. 2ND FLR. EL. 196.83' �— BLDG IST FLR_ EL. 185.00' BASEMENT LEVELQ,_ _ L. I EAST ELEVATION SCALE. 1/10 • 1'-0" WEST ELEVATION 5CALE. 1/16" . I'-0° JAN 0 b 1999 City of So. Burlington T.O. ROOF CURS L. 2 ." �— BLDG. 5TH FL . T.O. RGOF CUR@ 4T1rSdA' A..._.. EL BI- W. 3RD FLR A--- 20b.66 BLDG. .2ND FLR. (6-__ EL. 1%,83 91D6 I5T FLR _ EL. IB6�—ice J I ON OG F 8 b C � q 26'_1u 26'•0" 28'-0" 28'-0° 2a 0° 28 -0' 2a -O" I I q Y 7 JAN 0 6 1999 City of So. Bur(inatoa T.O. ROOF CURB T T T T T T T EL.24T66 - BIDG. ETI4 FLR. T.Q. ROOF CURB BL3RD FLR. EL . C666 BL OD FLR. EL: ice. fB DGL IS�FLR,_. _.. l LB 1 BASEMENT LEVEL E-L�i 3�7,�,__ NORTH ELMVATION SCALE. 1/I6' - I'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE I/16" - t'-0" - riY w✓" JAN 0 6 1999 ,city of So. Burlington 3 Ad.1 DSECON l."a-I FIRST LEVEL A4.1 SCALE t"ad0'-�. ,o b 1 JAN 0 6 1999 1ity of So. Burlington � r ', m �--_' 5TO13...iYM91'�� tee -�� r (' C d � '..� ��F r�{•:� t�C'(��ki1 �'. -..,..-._ _-_-. -_ AGE :. }-+ +-FF1 Ix + }{:r•. £ 1 c , .u., r... ; I...I. - ..1. r...} ...� .. `i'+f-4tt4, '.• :.::. : : i .. � � .k r � ' , +� � , , . r , 1 .'t-F ' 1 r r t� - tT ...r-...,.. ... � ... ,. �.'T r. t Y tP ,��fttId, ...,-{-H- H4��. �. -: + .: , � 1}. k.T+� ✓�S-F� t + .�. ;,� �C ,. i.k , r"P. .��...;RT"�. +, .,� _�.r.."3-.�s�, _. .� .. -,-+ -,J-. .:....:., ,_._.: .,. r..,. 1. 1. :��t�-, x-l-��., t .r, -i... "r ,1".._�-k- •M r t1}.. r+ �::, � ,�•:.#T:.., '::}.µ�7y.J{ , ,rlry'tt:,; { .,�xt`I � �'tE.ti' �;: N ~ eEAST WEST SECTION AT PARKING GARAGE SCALE 1 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES 2 ) Name of Subdivision IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application NO CHANGES 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Revisions to dimensions and internal design of parking structure; minor revisions to lot coverage; aMinor increase in number of parking spaces. 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c��ppntaining all information required under Section 202.1 the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulat* ns for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a m�ib or/� subdivkz ion . (Signature) -applicant or contact person . 6. ?9 Date AGF STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building ��qNs ` ,�. Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 POR January 26, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith South Burlington Town Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Weith: The Resource Systems Group Study makes several recommendations to address the impacts of the IDX expansion. The VAOT, with responsibility of maintaining NHS roads, such as US 7, and in conjunction with the planned Shelburne Road improvements will work cooperatively with IDX to implement these recommendations. Specifically: 1) With the expansion to over 300 employees, a left -turn lane is recommended to be constructed on southbound US 7 (with a right -turn signal head for IDX Dr). These improvements are identical to those proposed in the VAOT Shelburne Road improvements project. Under VAOT's current schedule, these should be constructed (or have started construction) prior to IDX exceeding 300 employees. In that case, VAOT will cover the full costs of those improvements. If the Shelburne Road project is held up in court, the VAOT will seek to segment the project to construct this portion of the project first. If this is not possible, then IDX would be responsible for constructing a turn lane at its own cost prior to the Shelburne Road improvements being implemented. 2) The current signal coordination plan is sufficient for IDX's additional employment at least until the Shelburne Road improvements are made. As part of that project, the VAOT will re -coordinate and re -time all of the signals in the corridor. It is the goal of VAOT to eventually hard -wire each of the signals together so that the corridor will maintain progression better. 3) VAOT will be reviewing the Resource Systems Group traffic impact study in more detail. While the levels of service look acceptable, VAOT will be focusing on corridor -level optimization. As such, VAOT may wish to modify its proposed Shelburne Road improvements to add a dual left -turn lane into IDX drive from US 7 southbound. I hope that I have addressed the City's concerns. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (802) 828-2663. Sincerely, David J. Scott, P.E. Director of Project Development Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. I 1 CITY OF SOUTH BUR.LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 29, 1999 John Caulo KessellDuff Corporation 11.0. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo Enclosed is a copy of the December 8, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, I�p jo�o oe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning JW mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 alone the sidewalk leading down from Spear Street A revised point by point lighting plan shall be submitted prior to the installa- tion of these lights. These lights shall be installed only if the applicant can meet the City's lighting standards 3. The handicapped parking space shall be marked as such on the site. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance a) The site plan shall be revised to show the dumpsters where they are currently located b) The site plan shall be revised to correct the note referring to the propane tank as a "heating oil" tank c) The site plan shall be revised to accurately show the "as -built" conditions of the concrete pads on the east and west sides of the building and the sidewalk along the driveway to Williston Road 5. The pole mounted floodlight_ east of the dumpsters shall hP removed. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months Pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void 7_. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compli- ance from the Administrative Officer for the propane tank, walk-in cooler equipment and air conditioning compressor. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission Ms. Barone seconded Motion passed unanimously. 6. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of a 354,520 sq. ft. general office use facility and a 646 space parking structure, 1400 Shelburne Road: Mr. Caulo said BDP owns four parcels, 3 of which will be included in this project. The total acreage is 16.9. The fourth parcel is not part of this application, and the fourth parcel is not needed i PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 to meet all coverages, frontages, etc. The basic concepts are not changed from sketch plan. There would be 2 curb cuts on IDX Drive. The curb cut on Shelburne Rd. would be closed. There will also be 2 curb cuts on Green Mountain Drive. Parking remains the same as at sketch. The one-story building will be demolished. Mr. Caulo then showed the plan for the 3 levels of the parking structure. An at -grade entrance to the top level has been added. The question of a building elevator was raised. Mr. Caulo said the Dept. of Labor & Industry feels it is not needed. There is a handicapped access at grade. It was noted that the same consultant has been used for this parking structure as for the one at the Airport. Mr. Dinklage asked if there will be a final rendering that the applicant will commit to at final plat. Mr. Caulo said yes. Mr. O'Rourke asked about lighting on the top deck of the parking structure and how it will impact the neighborhood. Mr Caulo said it would be consistent with lighting for surface parking. It will match fixtures that are there now. Mr. O'Rourke asked if the neighborhood will be shielded from garage lights. Mr. Caulo said topography will assure that. Mr. Caulo said they may want to phase the construction, build the 5-story building with basement first. They would time the 3rd level of the parking deck with completion of that building. He gave members a general proposed time -line. Mr. Weith said that typically when the Commission approves a multi- phase project, they put in a time limit so the project isn't hanging forever. Things such as sewer allocations, impact fees, and ordinances might change. He asked if the applicant could live with a condition that all building permits must be obtained by 12/92. Mr. Caulo said he would like to sit down with the applicant and discuss that. Mr. Calisky then gave the traffic report. He said they had looked at the corridor from Shelburne to Home Avenue. They also estimated the number of trips and how they would be distributed and then considered what would mitigate the impacts. Current counts show 1700 vehicles per day, Monday -Friday, and 200 vehicles per day on weekends. The 3 peak times of highest volume 5 PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 of 8-9 a.m., the noon hour, and 5:30-6:30 p.m. This is a little different from the peak of the rest of Shelburne Rd. The prediction is that with Phase I, there would be 160 more p.m. peak trips. At full buildout, there be 575 more p.m. peak hour trips. Intersections north of IDX Drive do pretty well now and will continue to do well. IDX Drive would have the worst impact. To mitigate these, a series of improvements is recommended. One problem would be the queue for left turns onto IDX Drive. A left turn lane is recommended. Shelburne Rd. improvements will take care of problems to the south. Signals will need to be reset and re -timed so traffic is coordinated again. Mr. Weith asked if the consultant had reviewed traffic analyses for Hannaford and L&M Park. Mr. Calisky said he had. Mr Weith noted that a condition for those approvals was that the developers coordinate signals. Mr. Calisky said there had been a lot of accidents at the IDX intersection, but there have been none since 1996 after the advance green turn signal was put in. It was noted that a large percentage of the IDX staff works at home or off -campus. Mr. Calisky noted there will be an on -site cafeteria so workers don't have to leave the site for lunch. The company will also provide safe storage for bicycles. Mr. Dinklage asked if anything can be done to improve the level of service at McIntosh Ave. and QCP Rd. Mr. Calisky said he didn't have counts at those intersections so they used estimates from the AOT. QCP Rd. has one movement that will become level of service "E" in the year 2005. Lights will need to be retimed then. Mr Calisky added that are a lot of unknowns before then. Mr. Weith said he would like to see a plan of what will be done at the intersections. He also asked about a detailed signal analysis. The analysis for Hannaford was much more detailed than the one being provided with this application and provided details of which will happen at each intersection. Mr. Caulo said they can continue to work with AOT. Ms. Barone said she felt Imperial Dr. should be on the list of intersections. She noted letters from residents expressing concerns. Mr. Weith asked the applicant to look at service levels at Imperial Dr. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 Mr. Beaudin asked if the extension of Holmes Rd. to Spear St. is still in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Weith said it is. Mr. Beaudin noted that the Hort Farm objects to this but it could solve a lot of traffic problems. Mr. Weith said the proposed road would split the Hort Farm in two. Mr. Bronk asked if it is possible to have a "no right on red" at IDX Drive. He said there is no traffic break for access to his development. Mr Dinklage asked if the traffic model can analyze this. Mr. Calisky said it can. It would add a layer of complexity, and they would have to see how it affects level of service. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 21,200 sq. ft. general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 sg ft. addition and a 20, 476 sq ft connector to an existing 124,208 sq. ft. general office building, 3) constructing a 646 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three lots into one lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page four entitled "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc_ et al, dated 11/12/98, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 Prior to issuance of zoninq permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed pubic road extension and utility, sewer, drainage, and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attornev for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3 Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4 In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.a., roads. water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the develoAer shall submit to the City Engineer "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5 Pursuant to Section 12 406(b) of the zoning regulations, the VA PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitations to be exceeded along Green Mountain Drive and IDX Drive. 6._Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 12 feet of the front DroDerty line. 7. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1394 spaces which represents a 62 space of 4.3% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 sq. ft. and excludes the 20,476 sq. ft. building connector/cafeteria space. 8. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving_. 9. Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10. The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 24,588 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission that the expansion will generate 565 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. A determination as to whether or not the project will create an adverse traffic impact is not made at this time. This determination shall be made at final plat. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall do the following: a) Conduct a signal timing/synchronization analysis for the corridor. In addition, a queue length analysis shall be prepared. b) Prepare a plan for the recommended southbound left -turn lane at IDX Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 c_) Amend the traffic impact analysis to include the impact of the Shelburne Road widening project south of IDX Drive d) Submit a proposal for developing and implementing a transportation demand program (e.g., flex -time, van pool, bus passes, etc.). e) Provide a level of service analysis for the Imperial Dr. intersection. 13. The plan shall be revised prior to final plat submission as follows: a) The parking count information on the cover sheet shall be revised to correct the square footage of office space (363,916 sq. ft.) and the number of spaces required (1456). b) The plans shall be revised such that parking in the northwest corner of the site is shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle/parking area and the proposed r.o.w., and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. c) The plans shall incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes regarding stormwater management. d) The two survey plats shall be combined into one plat showing the entire property. The property lines to be dissolved shall be noted as such. e) The site plan shall show the zoning boundaries. f) The landscape plan shall accurately show the r.o.w. taking at the northwest corner of the site. q) The site plan shall include a legend. h) The site plans shall be revised to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. i) Final building design elevations shall be submitted. i) Site plans shall be revised to reflect the parking deck design_presented at the 12/8/98 Planninq Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 DECEMBER 1998 14. The applicant shall submit a copy of the plans to the Citv Water Department for their review. 15. The sewer manhole inverts shall be poured concrete not bricks 16. All exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 17. The applicant shall provide lighting information within the Parking structure Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 18. The final plat submittal shall include information on the height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level from the average pre -construction grade. 19. The applicant shall research whether the legal documents are in place to extend and connect IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. 20_. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months. 21. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall submit a construction phasing schedule for the project. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site Plan Application of Gary Farrell to amend a previously approved plan for a 130 room hotel with a 135 seat standard restaurant. The amendment consists of constructing a 29 room, 2- story addition (19,800 sq. ft.) for a total of 159 rooms, 1117 Williston Rd. Mr. Boyle said there is a tiny intrusion into easements in two locations. Members expressed concern with this. The whole building will be sprinklered. Lighting will be rotated and become downcasting. Mr. Weith noted there is a condition that all lights be downcasting and shielded. He noted that glare from lights is visible off this property in the rear. He added it was the Commission's understanding that lights would be downcasting. Mr. Farrell said they can look at the angle of the lights. Mr. Weith said there are a number of techniques that can be used so light isn't visible of the property. Tipping them up does not comply with the approval the applicant received. Lights need to be pointed straight down at 90 degrees. 10 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 28, 1999 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on 12/8/98. If you have any questions, please give me a call. rely, Joe ith, Director Plan g and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl � I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 27, 1999 Irene Roberge Agency of Natural Resources I I I West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Sewer Allocation, IDX Expansion Dear Ms. Roberge: Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting of January 26, 1999 approved an additional sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd for the proposed expansion of the IDX facility at 1400 Shelburne Road owned by BDP Realty Associates. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. A Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will not be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. l�Az/�Z� Weith, Director ►Wing and Zoning JW/mcp If 2(0 (cl � - kM44,1 jkl-�M i- �J&tr 0* JAN-22-1999 13:48 RESOURCE SYSTEMS ORP 1 802 295 1006 P.02 ] ESOUkA SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. 22 January 1999 Ray Belaire South Burlington Planning Cornrt ssion 575 Do=et Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Ray: It has come to our attendon that [acre may be a minor typographic error in the IDX Traffic Impact Study, Revised 21 January 1999. In the discussion of the US 74raperW Drive intersection, Section 6 of the report, there may be the Following encc. ".., by it relatively few vehicles (:' in the PM peak hour)." The "X)DV' should be replaced with the number 33, so the :sport should read: ".., by a relatively few vehicles (33 in the PM peak hour)." Please make this correctiou if it exists in your copy/copies of the report. sir��terely, 0im Sys .r G V f I) GG chaei McCrory L Associatc 331 (Acute Dzive White Rivcr Junrdbr Vermont 05001.920 Tek 802.2",4999 Faoc.• W-295-1006 www.r4 mc.co n TOTAL P.02 RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: 21 January 1999 To: Ray Belaire Project: IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study We are sending you: X attached EJ under separate cover Copies Date Description 1 1 /21 /99 IDX Revised TIS with Full Appendix 6 1/21/99 IDX Revised TIS w/o Appendix These are transmitted: for approval for review and comment X for your use for distribution as requested for other Copy to: Remarks: Signed: 331 Olcott Drive White River Junction Vermont 05001-9263 Tek 802.295.4999 Fax. 802.295.1006 www.rsginc.com DR� l C�r MOTION OF APPRoVAL BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated I I/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space or 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation ofgpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen landscaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. c) The site plan (sheet SP 1) shall be revised change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. C) 5 �, 2 RV 16. In order to make a determination that project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left -turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 78,000 square feet of office space). Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Shelburne Road widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled, "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/21/99. For a period of five (5) years starting 10/1/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a year) progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. 17. The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Any phase which has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 19. The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP1, SP2, SP3 and L.l) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. 3 DRAFT MOTION OF APPROVAL BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES 1 /26/99 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 679 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, last revised 1/18/99, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitation to be exceeded along IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 32 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) ofthe zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1425 spaces which represents a 31 space or 2.1% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 24,800 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to recording a) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to add evergreen landscaping around the existing cooling tower adjacent to IDX Drive. c) The site plan (sheet SP 1) shall be revised change the note reading "residential zone" to read "R4 District." d) The plans shall be revised to show a sidewalk along the applicant's frontage on Green Mountain Drive. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 14. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for installing street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Prior to the start of construction of the streets, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of proposed street lights. This plan shall require approval of the City Engineer. 2 16. In order to make a determination that project will not cause an adverse traffic impact, the applicant shall be responsible for the following: a) At the Route 7/IDX Drive intersection, a southbound left -turn lane shall be constructed and appropriate signal phasing shall be installed and implemented, prior to the occupancy of more than 300 additional employees (approximately 78,000 square feet of office space). Said improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Shelburne Road widening plans developed by the VAOT. b) The applicant shall be responsible for developing and implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan as discussed in the traffic impact study entitled, "IDX Expansion," prepared by Resource Systems Group and dated 1/21/99. For a period of five (5) years starting 10/1/99, the applicant shall submit to the City, biannual (i.e., twice a year) progress reports explaining the status and results of said TDM plan. 17. The applicant shall obtain zoning permits for all phases by December 31, 2002. Any phase which has not received a zoning permit by this date shall require re -approval by the Planning Commission. 18. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 19. The final plat plans (boundary plat, and sheets SP1, SP2, SP3 and L.l) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the boundary plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning. 3 Applicant/Project Files January 26, 1998 agenda items January 14, 1999 Page 4 — plan should note location of nearest fire hydrant. — indicate type of screening proposed for dumpster enclosure. — the applicant is aware that this proposal results in two (2) vehicle trip ends (vte's) greater than allowed under the Traffic Overlay District. The Commission may approve peak hour traffic volumes above the normal standards if it determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow. — the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $360. — staff recommends only one (1) curb cut for both ingress and egress. This is to continue the City's policy of reducing the number of curb cuts along high volume roadways. — applicant should record a shared access agreement (see enclosed example) with the property to the west which would allow a future connection between the two (2) properties. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION - FINAL PLAT — the boundary plat should be revised to note that the "old" property lines are to be dissolved. — the plans do not comply with preliminary plat condition #13c that the plans incorporate the recommendations of Heindel and Noyes. — the "residential zone" on sheet SP 1 should be noted as "R4 District." — plans do not comply with preliminary plat condition #13h that requires the plan to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. — applicant should provide evidence that these plans have been submitted to the City Water Department. — plans do not appear to meet preliminary plat condition #17 regarding lighting inside parking garage. The only information provided was a cut -sheet for the light fixture. Type of light, wattage, quantity and locations were not provided. — condition #21 of the preliminary plat approval required a phasing plan, none was submitted. — the applicant should provide a point by point lighting plan for the entire property. The maximum illumination at ground level can not be in excess of an average of three (3) foot candles. 4 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 12, 1997 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Site Modifications, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 16, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Weith, Planner JW/mcp Encls \ PQSr � N � 8' WATER Pos Pos r co ` _17 Posr `r 1,'_---- 8'S ------ /------ ---------- -----------�f Pos r HOLMES ROADXNSION �' ' � - 8 GREEN ASH 5" CAL. �.^ -t < ra7 =�• ','� S� _ i '-'�'�r f aka.- i. r r .-r '.5. ,r1"? s!:. t.w•.c ., _ 3 } a 10 FLOWERING CRABAPPLES \. .. __5 3_3 1/2" .CAL. � f� r ALING TOWER = 1 7'.9 3 HONEYLOC — 4 AUSTRIAN PINS. • .=182.91 5„ CAL. /� --____ 15'Pyf .� 12�14' �{GT.-178.51 / T ; VC / 15 15 NDICAP RAMP - PLANING / . LIGHT1 BtD 78. SIDEWALKS AT RECE ' N BELT CROSSING LLARD (TYP) DEC .4 1997 / SIGN LIG cit of S0. Blur, / =t82.7; CON PT.`'7 17 CREATE A ORCHARD OF PLANTING WHICH SCREENS THE ' / f COOLING TOWER, RATHER THAN CLUSTERING PLANTS AT •. / THE BASE -WHICH OFTEN DRAWS ATTENTION.TO THE TOWER. SCALE, 1"=30' TITLE PROPOSED PLANTING DATE 1 1.1.97 CONCEPTS AT L 1 JOB a S 12 1• V t COOLING TOWER z5s.0010 0 ur in6tvn, ermon PROPOSAL May 24, 1999 STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION #4 Re: BDP Realty Associates Land Use Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151 (Act 250) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES' PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER NOW COME BDP Realty Associates ("BDP") to present the following proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and order in regards to the above -captioned Act 250 application. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW IDX Systems Corporation is a Vermont company formed in 1969 by two former IBM sales executives, Richard Tarrant and Robert Hoehl. IDX began as Burlington Data Processing in a single room on the second floor of a building on Church Street in Burlington. Richard Tarrant, the IDX CEO, and Bob Hoehl, the IDX Board Chairman, have transformed IDX into the third largest company in the $18 billion health care information system industry. IDX provides complete health care information solutions for integrated delivery networks including group practices, MSO health plans and hospitals. The company headquarters is located at 1400 and 1500 Shelburne Road in South Burlington. It is leased from BDP Realty Associates, a general partnership owned by Mr. Tarrant and Mr. Hoehl. IDX also has regional offices in ten locations throughout the United States, including Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Chicago, San Francisco and Seattle. As a result of the ongoing growth in the health care industry and at IDX, the company is proposing an expansion at its 16.9 acre campus in South Burlington. One of the goals of the expansion is to provide a state-of-the-art work environment with a pleasant campus setting, consistent with the high technology mission established by IDX. IDX will create an estimated 1,400 new jobs over the next six years. Annual wages of the new skilled employment opportunities are expected to be far above the Vermont average wage for an employee. The six year estimated incremental payroll cost associated with this project is $505 million. The IDX expansion project will consist of. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 2 ♦ Demolition of an existing 21,200 square foot, one story office building at 1500 Shelburne Road in South Burlington ♦ Construction of a 239,700 square foot, six story office structure ♦ Construction of a 20,500 square foot, two story facility containing a new reception area, multi -media center, kitchen and employee dining hall. This structure will link the existing 124,200 square foot office building at 1400 Shelburne Road to the proposed office structure at 1500 Shelburne Road ♦ On -site parking and circulation for a total of 1,425 vehicles, including the construction of a 679 space parking deck ♦ Off -site traffic improvements including the connection of two adjacent public streets, namely IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive, and elimination of an existing Route 7 curb cut servicing the property ♦ Extensive landscaping consistent with corporate campus planning Separate but related to the IDX Campus Expansion Project: ♦ The purchase and interior renovation of a 63,000 square feet of office building and warehouse space from Green Mountain Power Corporation on Green Mountain Drive in South Burlington. The GMP property will serve as a satellite for IDX and will link the IDX Campus via Green Mountain Drive. Site work for construction of the office structure and connecting link is expected to commence in August of 1999. All phases of project construction are expected to be completed by 2005. I1. PARTY STATUS According the Hearing Recess Order, dated March 16, 1999, statutory parties to the application include: the Applicant, represented by Shelly Russo of IDX, Ronald Roberts of BDP Realty Associates and Dale Rocheleau of Downs Rachlin and Martin PLLC; the Vermont Agency of Transportation, represented by David Scott and Amy Gamble; the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development, Department of Economic Development, represented by Curt Carter; and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, represented by Arthur Hogan. Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(A)(5), the following persons were granted party status for Criterion 5 - Traffic and Criterion 8 - Aesthetics: Pammella Starbuck (adjacent property owner at 75 Green Mountain Drive) and Steve Kornemann (adjacent property owner at 85 Green Mountain Drive). Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 3 Pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B)(2), The Friends of the University of Vermont Horticulture Farm (the "Friends"), represented by Kristina Bielenberg, were granted party status under Criterion 9(K) - Effects on Public Investments and Services. The Friends were denied party status under Criterion 5 - Traffic, 6 - Educational Services and 10 - Local and Regional Plans. In a letter to the District Commission, dated April 6, 1999, the Friends withdrew their request for party status under Criterion 9(K) (see Letter from the Friends, dated 4/6/99). The Commission granted the request and dismissed the Friends as a party in this proceeding. III. REQUEST FOR FEE REDUCTION On April 6, 1999, the Applicant notified the District Commission of its request for a reduction of the application fee pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §6083a(f). (See Dale Rocheleau Letter dated April 6, 1999). The Applicant filed a legal memorandum in support of the request for a fee reduction on May _, 1999. The Applicant believes that of 28 Act 250 criteria elements, 12 criteria have a final decision and 16 criteria have no final decision. Subsection (0 of Section 6083a of Title 10 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated provides: In the event that an application involves a project or project impacts that previously have been reviewed, the applicant may petition the chair of the district commission to waive all or part of the application fee. If an application fee was paid previously in accordance with subdivisions (a)(1) through (4) of this section, the chair may waive all or part of the fee for a new or revised project if the chair finds that the impacts of the project have been reviewed in an applicable master plan application, or that the project is not significantly altered from a project previously reviewed, or there will be a substantial savings in the review process due to the scope of review of the previous applications. 10 V.S.A. § 6083a(f) (Supp. 1998). [Note to Jim Boyd -- Need Commission Decision here] IV. PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW To the extent that the Commission has agreed with the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the Applicant and other parties, those findings and conclusions have been incorporated herein. Otherwise, said requests to find are denied. Unless otherwise stated, all findings of fact and conclusions of law shall apply to Application #4C0391-9. III making the following findings, the Commission has summarized the statutory language of the 10 criteria of Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 4 10 V.S.A. Section 6086(a): SECTION 6086(a)(1) WATER AND AIR POLLUTION The Commission concludes that the project will not result in undue air or water pollution. This finding depends on and is supported by the findings noted under the subsections of this criterion. SECTION 6086(a)(1) AIR POLLUTION Findings of Fact The project does not involve any manufacturing or industrial processes. 2. The project will utilize a water -source heat pump system for its heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC). The heating component of the HVAC system will be supplied by a central natural gas -fired boiler, which will distribute hot water throughout the building to the individual heat pumps. The Applicant has obtained a letter from the Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources, dated February 11, 1999, confirming that the project does not involve a stationary source of air contaminants. (See letter from Air Pollution Control Division of the Agency of Natural Resources, dated 2/1 1/99) 4. At the start of construction, stabilized access points to the construction site will be identified and established for the exclusive use of construction -related vehicles. During the construction period, disturbed areas of the site will receive applications of water and calcium chloride in order to control dust. After construction, disturbed areas will be immediately seeded and mulched in an effort to reestablish turf as soon as practicable. 5. Typical construction hours will be 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. If, due to scheduling constraints, construction work continues on Saturday, the typical construction hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. will continue to be observed. The Applicant has applied to the Agency of Natural Resources for an Air Pollution Control Permit for the indirect sources of air contaminants. (See Indirect Source Permit Application, dated 12/15/98) The project does not involve any radioactive materials. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 5 8. The structures are not intended for uses which will be considered a source of air emission, noxious odors, or noise pollution. (Similar to Finding No. 3, #4C0391-6) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not result in undue air pollution. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(1)(A) HEADWATERS Findings of Fact 9. The project is not located in a headwaters area as defined by the statute because the project: (i) is not designated as a public water supply by the Department of Health, (ii) is below 1500 feet elevation and (iii) is not characterized by steep slopes or shallow soils. [Similar to Conclusion of Law, #4C0391-6] Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project site is not located in headwater area as defined by this section. [Same as final decision in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(1)(B) WASTE DISPOSAL Findings of Fact 10. Based on Chapter 1 of the Environmental Protection Rules (8/8/96), administered by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, it is estimated that the project will generate approximately 25,800 gallons of sanitary waste per day. 11. The project will not utilize an on -site sewage treatment system. 12. The estimated 25,800 gallons per day of sanitary wastes for this project will be disposed of through connection to the municipal treatment plant at Bartlett Bay Treatment Facility. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Joe Weith, Director of Planning and Zoning for the City of South Burlington, stating that the South Burlington Planning Commission approved a sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd for the proposed IDX Expansion Project at its meeting on January 26, 1999. There is currently no reserve capacity available at the Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44CO391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 6 Bartlett Bay Treatment Facility. The approved allocation has been placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. A Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued at the time sewer capacity is available. (See Letter from Joe Weith, City of South Burlington, dated 4/22/99) I I The Applicant will rely on a water supply and wastewater disposal permit or a site and foundation approval letter from the Agency of Natural Resources to satisfy Criterion 1(B) with respect to sanitary wastewater discharges from the project. The Applicant has submitted a water supply and wastewater disposal permit application to the Agency of Natural Resources. 14. Heindel and Noyes, the hydrologist consultants for the City of South Burlington, prepared a hydrologic evaluation of the proposed IDX expansion project. Heindel and Noyes concluded that there will be a significant increase in peak discharge throughout the watershed as a result of the proposed IDX, expansion. Heindel and Noyes also concluded that the storm water management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission for the Bartlett Brook/North Brook watershed would be better met with the expansion of the existing storm water detention pond on the IDX site. (See Stormwater Analysis letter prepared by Heindel and Noyes, dated 1/21/99) 15. Heindel and Noyes calculated that if the existing detention pond is expanded to a bottom area of 7,713 square feet, side slope of 3:1, total depth of 8 feet, a desired stage of 48 inches and a 24" outlet orifice, the detention pond could adequately contain 102,909 cubic feet of flood water and effectively reduce the peak flow of 22.7 cfs during a high rainfall event. Consequently, the post construction peak inflow hydrograph of 59.2 cfs would be reduced to 22.7 cfs with additional storage capacity in the existing pond. This represents a 20% reduction in the pre -development peak flow of 28.7 cfs to a post - development peak flow of 22.7 cfs. (See Stormwater Analysis letter prepared by Heindel and Noyes, dated 1/21/99) 16. A riser pipe of 24" diameter and 4.0 feet high will serve as the principal spillway for the basin. Since it is desired to maintain water in the pond at all times, no dewatering hole is specified at the base of the riser, as would typically be done in a stormwater retention area. Therefore, no outflow from the pond would occur until the water surface rises above the top of the riser pipe. (See Stormwater Analysis letter prepared by Heindel and Noyes, dated 1/21/99) 17. Stormwater treatment mechanisms for paved areas include sheet flow over grassed swales and pond retention. Both techniques provide a means for the stormwater to receive Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 7 natural physical and biological treatment through direct contact with vegetation and retention. 18. The Applicant will rely on a Stormwater Discharge Permit submitted to the Agency of Natural Resources on March 11, 1999 to satisfy Criterion 1(B) with respect to stormwater discharges from the project. (See Stormwater Discharge Permit application) 19. The project does not involve the storage of oils, fuels, chemicals, cleaning fluids, solvents, batteries, pesticides, or other hazardous materials beyond what is normally expected to support a professional office environment. 20. Construction debris will be collected in storage containers and disposed of in an approved landfill site. To the greatest extent practicable, the Applicant will utilize the reuse and recycling options listed in the Vermont Construction Site Reuse and Recycling Directory published by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will meet applicable Health Department and Environmental Conservation Department regulations regarding the disposal of waste, and will not result in the injection of waste materials or harmful toxic substances into groundwater or wells. [No final decision for this criterion yet) SECTION 6086(a)(1)(C) WATER CONSERVATION Findings of Fact 21. The Applicant agrees to a permit condition which reads: "The permittee and all subsequent owners shall install and maintain only low -flow plumbing fixtures in any buildings, including toilets with flows not to exceed 1.6 gallons per flush, and low flow fixtures." Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project will utilize the best available technology for water conservation. [No final decision for this criterion yet] Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 8 SECTION 6086(a)(1)(D) FLOODWAYS Findings of Fact 22. No portion of the project is located in or adjacent to the 100-year floodway as identified on the National Flood Insurance Map. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that no portion of the project is located or adjacent to the 100-year floodway as identified on the National Flood Insurance Map. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-6] SECTION 6086(a)(1)(E) STREAMS Findings of Fact 23. There are no streams located on the project site. However, the project is located within the North Brook watershed and stormwater run-off from the site drains into the North Brook. An expanded stormwater detention pond is planned. It is designed for a 24-11our storm that is expected to occur only once every 25 years and still maintain the natural condition of North Brook. [Similar to Finding of Fact No. 10, 44C0391-6] 24. A hydrologic evaluation of the proposed IDX expansion project site, prepared by Heindel and Noyes, concludes that the result of the proposed storm water retention structure at the IDX site is a reduction to 22.7 cfs of the peak discharge from the site. For the North Brook watershed as a whole, the peak discharge is decreased from its existing level (from 122.0 cfs existing to 120.1 cfs after retention). (See Stormwater Analysis letter prepared by Heindel and Noyes, dated 1/21/99) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project has been designed to maintain the natural condition of the streams and will not endanger the health, safety or welfare of the public or adjoining landowners. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 9 SECTION 6086(a)(1)(F) SHORELINES Findings of Fact 25. There is no river, lake, pond or reservoir on or near the project site. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project will not be located on any shoreline. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(1)(G) WETLANDS Findings of Fact 26. There are no wetland areas in which construction is proposed. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not violate the rules of the Water Resources Board relating to significant wetlands as there are no wetlands within the limits of construction on the project site. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(2&3) WATER AVAILABILITY AND IMPACT ON EXISTING WATER SUPPLY Findings of Fact 27. The project will utilize the public water supply system operated by the City of South Burlington Water Department. The City of South Burlington is part of the Champlain Water District. 28. Water is supplied to the project via a 12" transmission main. Adequate storage is located just north of the intersection of Spear Street and Allen Road as provided by a 500,000 gallon water storage tank. 29. The Applicant has obtained letters from both the Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department and the Chief Engineer/Assistant General Manager of the Champlain Water District stating that the estimated demand for 25,800 gallons per day can be Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44CO391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 10 supplied without restricting or encumbering present users. (See letter from South Burlington Water Department, dated 1/19/99 and letter from Champlain Water District, dated 2/9/99) 30. The Applicant has received from the Agency of Natural Resources a permit to extend the municipal water line. (See Public Water System Permit to Construct, dated May 1999). 31. There is no separate commercial or industrial water supply required by the project. 32. There are no community wells located near the project. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that there is sufficient water available to meet the needs of this project and that it will not place an unreasonable burden on existing water supply. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(4) SOIL EROSION AND THE CAPACITY OF THE LAND TO HOLD WATER Findings of Fact 33. The project land is rectangular in shape and contains approximately 16.9 acres. Approximately 90 percent of the site is currently an open landscaped campus with an average slope of 5 percent. The upper easterly end of the property slopes up to Green Mountain Drive at approximately 20 percent. Existing and proposed contours, as well as the limits of soil disturbance, are shown on Sheets SP2 and SP3. 34. The project will be constructed in accordance with the erosion control measures shown on Sheet SPl with details shown on Sheet D3. Temporary erosion control measures include a stabilized construction entrance, haybale check dam, temporary sediment and debris control barrier, inlet protection and mulch. The project contractor will be responsible for compliance with the erosion control methods by plan and contract requirements. 35. Permanent erosion control measures include the wet detention pond, grassed swales and permanent seeding. These measures are shown on Sheets SP2 and SP3 with details shown on Sheets D2 and D3. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 94C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 1 1 36. All major site work and earth moving will be accomplished between April 15th and October 1st. Any soil disturbance from site work that occurs outside of these dates will be promptly re -graded and mulched at the conclusion of the work. 37. During the construction phase of the project, erosion controls will be inspected by the site contractor on a regular- weekly basis until the site has been brought to final design contours and turf areas have been seeded and established. 38. Approximately 65% of the site will be covered with buildings, roadways, parking areas and other impervious materials. 39. The flat -to -gently sloping character of the site, coupled with the stormwater collection and treatment system designed for the project, will prevent a dangerous or unhealthy situation for adjoining property owners in the event of flooding. 40. The project does not involve the construction of a permanent dam. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project will not cause unreasonable soil erosion or reduction in the capacity of the land to hold water. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(5) TRANSPORTATION Finding s of Fact 41. The project site is located along the easterly side of U.S. Route 7. All vehicular access to the project site will occur from two existing public roads intersecting Route 7, namely IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. IDX Drive is formerly known as Holmes Road. The City of South Burlington renamed the street as IDX Drive in 1998. 42. The project site plan calls for four (4) vehicular access points to the IDX campus. Two (2) existing curb cuts located along IDX Drive will continue to operate in their current capacity. In addition, two (2) additional curb cuts will be introduced along Green Mountain Drive. An existing curb cut along U.S. Route 7 will be abandoned under the proposed campus plan. 43. The vehicular access to the project site will occur from IDX Drive and Green Mountain Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 12 Drive. Green Mountain Drive is designed to accommodate existing and proposed traffic resulting from this development. The IDX Drive intersection requires the addition of a southbound left turn lane on US Route 7 upon the addition of 300 employees. The Vermont Agency of Transportation has designed improvements to US Route 7 in the vicinity of the project site as part of its transportation plan, including the southbound left turn lane from US Route 7 onto IDX Drive. IDX has obtained a letter from the Vermont Agency of Transportation indicating that the State of Vermont will be responsible for constructing the Route 7 left hand turn lane at IDX Drive (see AOT letter dated May 4, 1999). Appropriate signal timing and phasing changes at the intersection would also occur at the same time. 44. The Vermont Agency of Transportation understands that the District Commission has concerns about what might happen on Shelburne Road, in the future, if the Shelburne Road project does not move forward to completion. There is no question that Shelburne Road has significant problems with congestion in both the AM and PM peak hours. The Shelburne Road reconstruction project is the Agency of Transportation's attempt to correct the situation. If the project fails to obtain all necessary permits or is halted for other reasons, the Agency will still need to make improvements to the corridor. The improvements would most likely be minor spot improvements, that would relieve some congestion, but not solve the long term issues. (See letter from David Scott of AOT, dated 5/4/99) 45. The Agency of Transportation has estimated the cost of the left hand turn lane at the US 7/IDX drive intersection to be $80,000.00. The Agency will commit to completing the left turn lane. The lane is currently designed as a part of the Shelburne Road reconstruction project, but if the project should fail to advance on a time line compatible with the IDX expansion, the Agency will ensure the turn lane is constructed independent of the larger project. (See letter from David Scott of AOT, dated 5/4/99) 46. The Agency of Transportation currently expects to begin construction on the highway portion of the Shelburne Road project in 2001 and complete the project in 2002. This assumes that the permitting process, including any appeals, is completed by the end of 1999. This construction period should coincide with IDX reaching 300 additional employees. The Agency does not feel that it is important for the project to be completed prior to IDX reaching 300 employees. However, the Agency does believe that any IDX permit condition should reflect that construction of the turn lane should be underway prior to IDX reaching 300 employees. (See letter from David Scott of AOT, dated 5/4/99) 47. As part of the development on the IDX campus, improvements will be made to two local Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 13 roads. IDX Drive will be extended eastward approximately three hundred feet. Green Mountain Drive will be extended northward approximately three hundred feet where it will intersect with IDX Drive. Improvements to both roads will be constructed to City of South Burlington specifications. Road improvement plans, including profile and gradient, are shown on Sheets P 1 and P2. 48. A traffic study, prepared by Resource Systems Group, studied all signalized intersections on the Route 7 corridor between Bay Road in Shelburne and Home Avenue in Burlington and evaluated the impacts of the proposed project on nearby highways and intersections. The study concludes that the traffic associated with the project will not create unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on nearby highways or nearby intersections. (See Traffic Study, dated 2/16/99). 49. Green Mountain Drive was designed for 1700 vehicles per hour. There are currently 170 trips per hour on Green Mountain Drive. The proposed project is expected to -add about 60 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and 66 trips during the p.m. peak hour. This translates to approximately one vehicle per minute. 50. The proposed project is expected to generate 623 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 508 trips during the p.m. peak hour by 2005. Eighty percent (80%) of the trips will come from the north and 20% of the trips will come from the south. Most of the trips will use IDX drive, although 60% of the trips with origins or destinations in the south will use Green Mountain Drive. [Kaliski testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] 51. The circulation plan shown on Sheets SP2 and SP3 of the plan set have been designed to accommodate vehicular access for both tractor trailer and emergency fire fighting apparatus. 52. The proposed site plan includes 1,425 on -site parking spaces. Based on established work patterns of IDX employees at the project site, the proposed number of spaces will be adequate for peak periods. 53. Trip generation from the proposed IDX expansion in the p.m. peak hour will be spread out between 3:00 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. The greatest number of trips is just after 5:00 p.m. Recent counts at IDX show that 27% of the employee traffic between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. leave between 5:00 p.m. and 5:15 p.m. (See Traffic Study, dated 2/16/99). 54. In the year 2000, the p.m. level of service of the IDX Expansion project will remain at or below level of service C under the build and no -build scenarios. In the year 2005 after Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 14 the Shelburne Road improvements, the p.m. level of service will also remain at or below level of service C at the signalized intersections on Route 7. (See Traffic Study, dated 2/16/99) 55. In order to deal with congestion that may be caused by the IDX Expansion, phased improvements will be needed on Route 7. Namely, a left hand turn lane at IDX Drive is required in order to maintain a level of service C or better at the intersection. Corridor offsets and signal timings need to be maintained with increased travel demand. Shelburne Road improvements will solve congestion impacts south of the proposed project. [Kaliski testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] 56. IDX Drive has been considered a high accident location. However, there has been a significant drop in accidents after signal timing and phasing change in 1995/96. The IDX Drive intersection is expected to drop off the list as a high accident location. There are no other safety concerns in other corridors on Route 7 as a result of this proposed project. (See Traffic Study, dated 2/16/99) 57. IDX has agreed to consider the recommendations proposed by the traffic study, including on -site services, carpool/vanpool support, free bus passes, bike/pedestrian facilities, and flex time. IDX will conduct a survey of its employees to learn their preferences with respect to the recommendations. IDX is currently working with the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) with respect to traffic demand management strategies and a traffic management association. [Kaliski and Russo testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] 58. IDX has provided a letter to the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) regarding organization of a Traffic Management Association (TMA). This letter states that IDX is working on a study that will provide insight regarding employee's travel patterns and willingness to participate in various programs. IDX frilly supports a Traffic Management Association for Shelburne Road and are willing to commit time to participate in meetings with other Shelburne Road employers. (See IDX letter to MPO, dated 4/27/99) 59. IDX has created a preliminary Traffic Demand Management (TDM) Plan. IDX is confident in committing to the following program: flexible arrival and departure times, preferential parking for carpoolers, bike racks, locker rooms and showers, use of public transportation, use of car pools, and use of the commuter rail. (See Preliminary Traffic Demand Management Plan, dated 4/27/99) Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 15 60. IDX and the Vermont Rideshare Program have prepared an employee transportation survey to evaluate issues that impact the daily commute of IDX employees. (see Preliminary Traffic Demand Management Plan, dated 4/27/99) 61. David Scott of the Agency of Transportation provided a letter to Mark Sinclair of the Conservation Law Foundation stating that the Agency of Transportation stands ready to assist the Chittenden County MPO and IDX in their efforts to develop a trip reduction program for the Shelburne Road corridor. AOT believes that the trip reduction program should target the corridor and not just one employer to achieve maximum benefit. (See Scott letter to CLF, dated 5/7/99) 62. The project does not involve a railroad or airport. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions with respect to transportation. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(6) EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Findings of Fact 63. [Reserved for anticipated letter from City of South Burlington School Superintendent] 64. Economists Jeffrey Carr and Lawrence Copp of Economic & Policy Resources, Inc. (EPR), have completed an economic analysis of the IDX Expansion Project to include a 10-year projection of the economic and fiscal impacts of the proposed expansion plan (the "Economic Analysis"). The Economic Analysis, which reflected a maximum, most - accelerated development scenario for the Applicant's proposed expansion project, has projected the total employment, population and housing impacts of the proposed project, the geographical distribution of employment, population and housing impacts, the indirect growth for the area, the number of school age children, and a comprehensive analysis of the fiscal impacts to the affected municipalities. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 65. The Economic Analysis defined the impact region as including 62 municipalities in the 6 county region which includes Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle, Lamoille, and Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 16 Washington counties. The Economic Analysis also defined a high impact area that included the following 9 communities: Burlington, Charlotte, Colchester, Essex, Richmond, Shelburne, South Burlington, Williston, and Winooski.(See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 66. IDX anticipates hiring an additional 1,397 employees over the ten year period. The computer model used in the Economic Analysis predicts that as a result of the IDX expansion, a total of 1,397 direct jobs and 1,021 indirect jobs will be generated in the six county area for a total of 2,418 jobs over the 10 year period. This job growth will result in a population increase of 2,462 and the formation of 970 new households. This increased population can be expected to locate in communities in the Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle, Larnoille and Washington County region. These new households are most likely to locate in communities with less than a one -hour commute to and from the IDX campus. There are 62 communities that are within this defined area. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 67. The total increase in school -aged population (defined as the population between the ages of 5 years and 18 years) in the 62 communities receiving the 970 new households is estimated to be 623 students. The nine community high impact area is expected to receive 252 of these new students. Estimated impacts in the high impact area range from a high of 43 students in the City of Winooski to a low of 24 students in the Towns of Charlotte and Richmond over the ten year impact period. No projected impact for any single community in the impact region is expected to represent more than 3.5 % of existing student populations with the exception of Winooski which is estimated at 4.8 % (refer to Table 7 of the Economic Analysis). Thus, the Economic Analysis demonstrates that local school districts can accommodate additional students from the approval of the proposed project without suffering an undue financial burden. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 68. A review of the high impact communities has shown that existing school capacities are generally adequate. Many communities, however, are near or at full capacity without the addition of IDX and are already undertaking plans to address those needs. In the post Act 60 environment, the real issue is whether the IDX project will result in a significant per pupil increase in spending attributable to debt service for expanded facilities. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 69. The Economic Analysis Concludes that a significant increase in per pupil spending attributable to the proposed project Is not likely to occur in any C0111111umty In the region. At the current average cost per pupil in each high -impact community (which includes Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 17 average per pupil service costs that current exist in each community), the projected annual cost increase attributable to the proposed project is not expected to exceed 3.5% of the current school system budget in any community with the exception of Winooski which is estimated at 4.8% (refer to Table 8 of the Economic Analysis). (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 70. The Economic Analysis demonstrates that approval of the proposed project will not result in undue financial burdens for any community studied even if the project contributes to a portion of the need to expand core facilities in some communities. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 71. By the end of the ten year analysis period, the Economic Analysis found that no individual community is expected to experience a significant cumulative negative net fiscal impact on schools: This is based on the current per pupil (long-term daily membership) based state funding mechanism under Act 60, where communities receive adequate per pupil resources as long as individual communities correctly set their tax rates to meet the budgeted level of per pupil spending. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 72. On April 6, 1999, the Economic Analysis was updated to include additional information pertaining to the proposed project's impact on schools. This updated report was called the "Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment Projection". The Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment used more recent per pupil spending estimates from the Vermont Department of Education and updated information on the flow of education funds between state and local governments under Act 60 and collection of school taxes by localities. The results of this Alternative School Fiscal Assessment showed that all communities in the high impact region experienced small to moderate sized "net" school surpluses with the approval of the project under the post -Act 60 school finance law. In South Burlington, the Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment showed a cumulative $0.531 million "net" school surplus over the ten year impact assessment period. (See Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment Projection, dated 4/6/99) 73. The Economic Analysis was cognizant of the Applicant's publicly stated goal of hiring the greatest possible number of new employees for its expansion from the existing Vermont labor pool and its effort to develop and implement a comprehensive workforce development plan. However, the Economic Analysis made no specific assumptions about the level of success by the Applicant in achieving its goal of hiring mostly Vermont residents for the proposed project. This was done in order to produce a conservative set of "high impact" population/fiscal impact estimates for the proposed project. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 18 74. IDX has a Workforce Development Plan. The purpose of this plan is to describe: (i) the current employment situation at the IDX South Burlington facility; (ii) the project employment needs for the next five years (1999-2004) and (Ili) how the projected employment needs can be met utilizing a very high percentage of Vermont residents. (See Workforce Development Plan, dated 3/99) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide educational services. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(7) MUNICIPAL SERVICES Findings of Fact 75. The City of South Burlington has completed an Act 250 Municipal Impact Questionnaire. The response of the host community for the proposed project indicates that the project will not impose an unreasonable burden on the City I s ability to provide fire protection, police protection, rescue service, solid waste disposal, and road maintenance. (See Municipal Impact Questionnaire, dated 2/12/99) 76. The Economic Analysis indicated that no community in the 6 county impact region, including the 9 communities in the high impact area, will experience an undue burden in the provision of essential municipal services. The Economic Analysis showed that no individual community is expected to experience total population or municipal fiscal impacts of more than 2.6% of their estimated 2008 population nor more than 2.3% of any community's current municipal budget (refer to Tables 9 and 10 of Economic Analysis). (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 77. The communities of Essex, Williston and Shelburne are forecast to experience minor net municipal deficits at the end of the 10 year assessment period using the Economic Analysis' conservative approach to estimating revenues and a more liberal approach for estimating increased- services demand cost impacts. However, the Economic Analysis noted that any small projected municipal deficits will likely be offset by increases in tax revenues in those communities due to the likely appreciation of property values for existing real property in those communities' Grand Lists. The Economic Analysis excluded any increased revenue potential from such an increase in existing real property values in order to produce conservative fiscal impact analysis results. (See Economic Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 19 Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 78. Because the project is located in a Traffic Overlay district as defined by the City of South Burlington, the Applicant will pay a traffic impact fee based on a formula established by the City. 79. The Applicant plans to begin construction in August, 1999. The work will begin with demolition of the existing 21,200 square foot, one story building at 1500 Shelburne Road. With the existing structure demolished, sitework will commence involving grading and utility installation. This phase of the work is scheduled for completion in August of 2000. (See Construction Phasing Schedule, dated 3/23/99) 80. When the progress of the sitework allows, in early fall 1999, building construction will commence. Building construction will consist of essentially two phases. Phase I will be the east wing of the new office building. Phase II will be the west wing of the new office building. Each phase of the building may include subphases. For example, the Applicant is currently planning to phase the east wing. This phasing will be vertical. The Applicant will construct the basement and three floors initially and then add the top two floors to the structure. Current plans for the west wing continue to be to build in a single phase when required. (See Construction Phasing Schedule, dated 3/23/99) 81. Under the current phasing plan building construction will commence in early fall 1999, consisting of Phase IA of the east wing (117,000 square feet) and the connecting link (20,500 square feet). Initial occupancy of this phase is scheduled for January 2001. As corporate growth requires, construction of Phase IB of the east wing (58,600 square feet) and Phase II, the west wing (64,000 square feet), will proceed. Current growth projections predict a project build -out in the year 2005. (See Construction Phasing Schedule, dated 3/23/99) 82. When occupancy of approximately 80,000 square feet of new office space is achieved, surface parking will be fully utilized. The Applicant will schedule the construction of the structured parking such that its completion coincides with further occupancy beyond the capacity of the surface parking. Current growth projections predict completion of the structured parking in the second half of the year 2003. 81 The project will not result in undue impacts on services provided by adjacent municipalities. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 20 Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not place an unreasonable burden on the ability of the municipality to provide municipal services. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(8) AESTHETICS, SCENIC BEAUTY, HISTORIC SITES AND NATURAL AREAS Findings of Fact 84. The Applicant's phasing schedule includes information regarding the time frame for landscaping that will take place after each phase of the project has been completed. (See Construction Phasing Schedule, dated 3/23/99) 85. The project site is located along the east side of US Route 7, the major northdsouth transportation corridor in the Champlain Valley of Vermont. Over the past 50 years, the corridor has been transformed from agrarian and low -density commercial land use patterns of the past to the current palette of diverse commercial development, including retail, office, warehouse distribution and manufacturing land uses. The area immediately surrounding the project site is dominated by automobile dealerships and other commercial establishments. The project site is located within a commercial zone district (C2) as established by the City of South Burlington. 86. The project site is a rectangular parcel of land containing approximately 16.9 acres. The site is bounded on the north by IDX Drive and a multi -tenant commercial center; on the east by Green Mountain Drive and several free standing commercial enterprises; on the south by an automobile dealership and on the west by US Route 7. The site, which is currently owned by the Applicant and used as the corporate headquarters of IDX, contains two (2) office buildings, landscaped grounds and surface parking for approximately 780 vehicles. 87. No historic sites have been found on this project site. 88. Necessary wildlife habitat and rare and irreplaceable natural areas have not been found on this project site. [Similar to Finding of Fact No. 25, #4C0391-6] 89. The IDX office headquarters is a permitted use under the City of South Burlington zoning ordinance, and is consistent with the range of commercial land uses described above Which currently operate in the area. Further, the project will not generate any significant Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 21 noise related acts during and/or after the construction phase. 90. The building size, density, and location of the project is compatible with the terrain of the site, the size of nearby buildings, and surrounding vegetation. There are no nearby scenic vistas from highways or community centers. The scale and massing of the proposed addition is consistent with the existing IDX building and complies with all dimensional site planning criteria established by the City of South Burlington. In addition, the key elements of the proposed site plan (i.e., prioritization of vehicular access points, orientation of the proposed buildings, landscaping, location and distribution of surface and structured parking) reinforce and enhance the planned nature of this corporate campus. 91. The architectural style, building materials and colors proposed for the project are a continuation of the style established at the existing IDX building, and is also compatible with other buildings in the area. The existing IDX building is a 3-story, steel frame structure containing approximately 124,000 square feet. The exterior design of the building can be characterized as contemporary, featuring a monolithic exterior wall surface interrupted by three (3) horizontal bands of continuous window glazing; one at each floor of the building. The predominant material used on the exterior of the existing building (and proposed for the office component of the addition) is an Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS). EIFS is a durable, synthetic stucco exterior finish system, which has been designed for commercial applications on structures such as IDX. 92. The appearance of the existing building is earth tone, featuring a sandy, beige color highlighted by deep brown, anodized aluminum frames at the window glazing. The contemporary design and appearance of the existing IDX building is also consistent with surrounding properties, most notably the multi -tenant retail center located directly north of the project site on US Route 7. 93. The scale, massing and appearance of these existing buildings will be reflected in the office component of the new addition. The proposed office addition is an "L" shaped, steel frame structure containing approximately 239,700 square feet. The east wing of the proposed building is six (6) stories, containing five levels of office and one level of basement storage. The west wing of the proposed building contains four (4) levels of office. Given the placement of the building and existing site grades, the roof line of the east wing will be two (2) floors higher than the existing building; however, the roof line of the west wing will be on the same horizontal plane as the existing building. 94. The upper three levels of the proposed office building will feature the same color scheme Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 22 and continuous window pattern as the existing building, reinforcing the visual connection between the two. The lower levels of the new building will feature a subtle change in both the texture and tinting of the EIFS, and window pattern. The purpose of this change is to visually acknowledge the grade change around the building by providing a plinth, or a base, in scale with the mass of the building. 95. The existing and proposed office buildings will be linked by a two (2) story, 20,500 square foot structure that will serve as the new building entrance to the IDX headquarters. In addition to its function as corporate lobby and reception area, the first floor will also contain a variety of assembly spaces, including conference and meeting rooms as well as a multi -media theatre for presentation purposes. The second floor of the proposed link will contain a commercial kitchen and cafeteria for IDX employees and guests. 96. The exterior appearance of the proposed link building will feature a fully glazed curtain wall system designed to reflect the advanced technological mission of IDX. As such, the link building will offer visual contrast to both the existing and proposed office components of the project, and further reinforce its role as the gateway to the corporate campus. Architectural elevations of the proposed buildings (Sheets A3.1 and A3.2) contained in the project are included in the plan set. 97. The proposed buildings contain window treatments that can be utilized to decrease the amount of light that enters or escapes the building. The proposed buildings face the west and receive strong afternoon sun. Blinds are typically lowered in the building as a matter of practice. [Testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] 98. The project site currently includes on -site parking and circulation for approximately 780 vehicles. With the proposed addition, the parking count will increase to 1,425 vehicles including 968 surface parking spaces distributed throughout landscaped parking areas around the buildings. 99. A multi -level parking structure containing parking for 457 vehicles will be designed to take advantage of the sloped condition existing along the east portion of the site so that the tipper level of the parking deck will be approximately at the same elevation as the adjacent Green Mountain Drive. The parking and circulation plan for the project is shown on Sheets SP I through SP3 of the plan set. Architectural plans and sections of the parking structure are included on Sheet A4.1 of the plan set. 100. Existing signage at the IDX campus includes two building -mounted, back -lit signs showing the distinctive "IDX" logo. A free-standing, internally illuminated sign is also Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 23 presently located on the IDX property along Shelburne Road. As part of this application, the Applicant is proposing that a corporate logo be incorporated into a landscaped stone retaining wall at the northwest corner of the site (at the intersection of Shelburne Road and IDX Drive). A similar free-standing sign will be located at the auto court/reception area of the campus headquarters. 101. A lighting consultant, at the firm Light - Space - Design, prepared a Parking Lot Design Photometric Analysis which forms the basis for the Preliminary Lighting Plan (Sheet L2) contained in the plan set. 102. In all areas of the IDX grade level parking, the illuminance is 0.6 footcandles, with points below this level in corner areas of the parking. This is extremely low compared to the surrounding area with approximately 34 footcandles in the auto dealership parking lot immediately to the south of the IDX campus and 17 footcandles in the retail building parking lot immediately to the north of the IDX campus. [Testimony presented at the 3/23/99 hearing] 103. The interior lighting of the proposed buildings is a switched system to allow lighting of portions of the building where people are working. [Testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] 104. All utilities have been designed to minimize their visibility from the highway or nearby residences. There is no propane gas service to the project. Company trash and recyclables will be handled by compactors that are either inside the existing garage bays next to the existing loading dock or a 3 sided enclosure next to the new loading dock. Trash and recyclables will be trucked off site. All secondary power will be fed to the building underground from screened pad mounted transformers. 105. The proposed site plan will receive abundant landscaping, including shade trees, foundation plantings, turf and selected landscape elements. In addition, existing landscaping installed under prior permit applications will be relocated in accordance with the new campus plan. Refer to Sheet L-1 of the plan set for a detailed landscaping plan for the project. 106. The Landscape Architect will determine which trees on the site will be kept and he will flag these trees for removal prior to construction. The locust trees on the site will be maintained. [Testimony presented by Wagner at 3/23/99 hearing] 107. The Applicant is willing to look carefully at preserving a buffer of trees between Green Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 24 Mountain Drive and the proposed parking garage. [Testimony presented at 3/23/99 hearing] Conclusion The Commission concludes that the development will not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(8)(a) NECESSARY WILDLIFE HABITAT AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Findings of Fact 108. Necessary wildlife habitat and endangered species have not been found on this project site. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes necessary wildlife habitat and endangered species have not been found on the project site. [Compare final decision under Criterion 8 of #4C0391-6. Findings for #4C0391-6 do not include a separate section for Criterion 8(A)] SECTION 6086(a)(9)(A) IMPACT OF GROWTH Findings of Fact The Environmental Board's decision in Re: St. Albans and Wal*Mart Stores, Inc., Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order #6170471-EB (Altered), June 27, 1995, states that in order to satisfy the burden of proof under Criterion 9(A), applicants in towns with duly adopted capital improvement programs must provide and prove all of the following: a) The growth in population experienced by the town and region in question. b) The total growth and rate of growth which is otherwise expected for the town and region. C) The total growth and rate of growth for the town and region which will result Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Nee 25 from the proposed project if approved. d) The anticipated costs for education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water supply, police and fire services and other factors relating to the public health, safety and welfare. e) Based on (a) through (d), that the proposed project will not cause an undue burden on the existing and potential financial capacity of the town and region in accommodating growth caused by the proposed project. Wal*Mart, P. 30. The Commission's findings under this criterion are grouped together according to the categories above: a) The growth in population experienced by the town and region in question. 109. The Economic Analysis concluded that the region within which impacts from IDX are projected to occur is the 6 counties of Addison, Chittenden, Franklin, Grand Isle, Lamoille and Washington. Specifically, the report examines the impacts of IDX on all communities with less than a one -hour commute at prevailing peak hour speed limits from the IDX site. This approach resulted in the identification of 62 communities within the 6 county region (refer to Summary Table 3 of Exhibit 22). (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 110. From 1980 to 1996 the population of the City of South Burlington grew by a total of 3,627 or a rate of 1.7% per year. During the same sixteen year period of time, the 6 county region experienced a population growth rate which averaged 1.1 % per year. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) b) The total growth and rate of growth which is othenvise expected for the town and region. 111. Total population is expected to grow by approximately 1,140 residents in the City of South Burlington during the period 1999-2008, corresponding to an annual rate of 0.8%. The projected increase in population for the six county region during the period 1999- 2008 is 15,486 or an average of 0.5% annual rate of increase. The number of housing units is projected to increase by 5,647 units or at an average annual rate of 0.5% from Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application 44C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 26 1999 to 2008 in the 6 county region and at a 0.7% annual rate in South Burlington during the same period. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 112. The projected employment growth from 1998 to 2003 for South Burlington is expected to average 1.5% per year and 1.1 % per year in the 6 county region. The projected annual average rate of growth in personal income in nominal dollars for the period for the City of South Burlington is 5.9% and 4.6% for the region. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) c) The total growth and rate of growth for the town and region which will result from the proposed project if approved. 113. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in: an increase in South Burlington's total population of 103 persons. This consists of a 9.1 % of the total status quo increase of 1,140 persons over the period, but represents only 0.7% of the total projected 2008 population of 15,577 persons without the approval of the proposed project in South Burlington. For the 1999- 2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that IDX will result in an increase in the region's total population of 2,462 persons. This represents 15.9% of the total status quo increase over the period of 15,486 persons in the region, but represents only 0.8% of both the total projected 2008 population of 322,389 persons in the 6 county region and the total projected 2008 population of 292,048 for the 62 community impact region.(See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 114. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in: an increase in South Burlington's housing stock of 41 units. This represents 9.9% of the total increase of 414 units expected over the period, but represents only 0.6% of the total projected 2008 housing unit count of 6,418 units for South Burlington. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 115. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in an increase in the impact area's housing stock of 970 units. This represents 17.8% of the total status quo increase anticipated over the period totaling 5,647 units, but represents only 0.8% of both the projected 2008 housing unit count of 114,596 for the 62 community impact region and the projected 2008 housing unit count of 126,369 for the 6 county region. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 116. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in an increase in South Burlington's school age Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 27 population of 26 children. This represents 1.1 % of the total 1998-99 student population and an average of 2.6 new students per year over the period. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 117. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in an increase in the region's school age population of 623. This consists of less than 1.0% of the total current student populations in both the 6 county and 62 community impact regions. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 118. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in an increase in South Burlington' s employment base by slightly over 105 direct and indirect jobs (This estimate refers to jobs held by South Burlington residents. It does not represent the number of new employment opportunities created at the IDX campus). This represents 0.5% of the total anticipated growth of 2,226 jobs over the period. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 119. For the 1999-2008 impact period, the Economic Analysis predicts that approval of the IDX Expansion project will result in an increase in the region's employment base of 2,418 direct and indirect jobs. This comprises 1.1% of the total anticipated growth of 15,832 jobs expected over the ten year period. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 120. The Applicant consulted with high impact communities to ensure that there are no problems with the methodology or the numbers presented in the Economic Impact Analysis. 121. The Project will not create an undue financial burden upon the ability of any town or region to accommodate population growth associated with the project. d) The anticipated costs for education, highway access and maintenance, sewage disposal, water supply, police and fire services and other factors relating to the public health, safety and welfare. 122. The Economic Analysis estimated the financial costs and benefits of the project related to educational and municipal services provided by the City of South Burlington. Benefits include the creation of new direct and indirect jobs, increased municipal tax revenues and economic growth. Under the Act 60 education funding law and its financial balancing mechanisms where there is no significant change in per pupil spending levels, the Economic Analysis demonstrates there will be no significant net negative fiscal impact of any school system in the impact region over the next ten years from 1999 to 2008. In Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 28 fact, it is likely a less conservative approach would result in modest positive financial impacts on all schools systems in the study region. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/16/99) 123. The Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment indicates a net positive cumulative fiscal benefit of $0.530 million in the City of South Burlington related to providing municipal services for the same ten year impact assessment period from 1999-2008. (See Alternative School Fiscal Impact Assessment presented at 4/6/99 hearing). Further, an analysis of all high impact communities and the Towns of Hinesburg and St George similarly demonstrate that and no other individual community in the impact region will likely experience an undue financial burden as well. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/ 16/99) 124. Overall considering education and municipal service cost and revenue impacts, no individual community in the impact area is expected to experience a significant positive or negative net fiscal impact in the provision of essential educational services or municipal services using conservative cost and revenue impact analysis scenarios for each community in the 9 community high impact area. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/ 16/99) 125. The Economic Analysis demonstrates that no individual community is expected to experience total population effects of greater than 2.6% of the projected 2008 total population levels. Similarly, the Economic Analysis demonstrates that no projected school -age population impacts resulting from the approval of the proposed project is expected to exceed the level of 3.5%, with the exception of the City of Winooski where this percentage is projected to be 4.8%. Further, no community appears to experience school budget impacts which exceed 3.5% of existing 1998-99 school budgets, the City of Winooski's estimated 4.8% percentage notwithstanding. Nor are the projected municipal budget impacts projected to exceed the level of 2.3% respectively of existing 1998-99 municipal budgets. Moreover, even in the situation in the City of Winooski where there is potentially a significant school -age population impact (vis-a-vis the 1998- 99 equalized student counts), it is clear that the analysis shows that a conservative estimate of expected education revenues shows that Winooski schools under Act 60 impacts would likely receive adequate revenues —on an average revenue per student basis through the block grant system --to off -set any additional core facilities costs attributable to the proposed IDX project. These conclusions hold, even if the entire ten year impacts were to be experienced in the current budgetary year. (See Economic Analysis, dated 2/ 16/99) Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 29 126. The project is not residential in nature. 127. It is the position of the Department of Economic Development that the IDX expansion will clearly have a favorable impact on the "financial capacity" of the town, the region and State. (See Letter from the Dept. of Economic Development, dated 4/6/99) 128. The Department of Economic Development has actively encouraged and assisted IDX to expand in Vermont because the expansion project is fully consistent with the Department's "Strategic Plan." The IDX expansion project carries out the following specific initiatives of the Plan: Produces dollar importing, market driven, high value added products and services Supports a high skill work force Assists in closing Vermont's wage gap with the rest of the nation Tends to be technology intensive Makes capital investments to foster continuous improvement and innovation (See Letter from the Dept. of Economic Development, dated 4/6/99) 129. The Department of Economic Development has thoroughly reviewed the Economic Impact Analysis done by Economic and Policy Resources and concurs with the conclusions of this study and believes that it is a conservative analysis. (See Letter from the Dept. of Economic Development, dated 4/6/99) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not cause an undue burden on the existing and potential financial capability of the city and region in accommodating growth caused by the project. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(9)(B) PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS Findings of Fact 130. The project site does not contain any primary agricultural soils. Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 30 Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project will not result in a reduction of the agricultural potential of any agricultural soil. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(C) FOREST AND SECONDARY AGRICULTURAL SOILS Findings of Fact 131. The project will not significantly reduce the potential of secondary agricultural soils or forest soils. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the soils on the site do not qualify as forestry or secondary agricultural soils. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(D&E) EARTH RESOURCES AND EXTRACTION OF EARTH RESOURCES Findings of Fact 132. The proposed grading plan utilizes the existing contours of the site to minimize the amount of earth disturbance. 133. There are no unknown earth resources on the development site. [Same as Finding of Fact No. 34, #4C0391-6] onclusion of Law The Commission concludes that there are no significant earth resources on the property and the project does not involve the extraction of earth resources. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(F) ENERGY CONSERVATION Findings of Fact 134. The office areas within the buildin; will be COI1StruCted using minimum Insulation values Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Paee 31 of R-20 in the exterior walls and R-30 in the roof and R-10 in the foundation. Structures meet or exceed the ASHRAE 90-80 requirements. All exterior glazing will be low emissivity type, set in thermally broken aluminum frames and all glass will be 1" insulated. The building will receive strong solar gain in late afternoon, spring, summer and fall. Deciduous shade trees will shade lower stories. [Same as Finding of Fact No. 36, #4C0391-6] 135. The project will comply with the Vermont Consolidated Act 250 Energy Guidelines for Typical Commercial and Industrial Buildings. 136. The project will utilize a water -source heat pump system for heating, ventilating and air condition (HVAC). The heating component of the HVAC system will be supplied by a central natural gas fired boiler, which will distribute hot water throughout the building to the individual heat pumps. The air conditioning component of the heat pump system will be powered by electricity. The HVAC system utilized by the Project will comply with the Vermont Consolidated Act 250 Energy Guidelines for Typical Commercial and Industrial Buildings. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the planning and design of the project reflect the principles of energy conservation and incorporates the best available technology for the efficient use or recovery of energy. [Same as Conclusion of Law, #4C0391-6] [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(9)(G) PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES Findings of Fact 137. All of the utilities serving the project are publicly owned. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project does not involve private utilities because the project will be owned, operated and maintained by BDP Realty Associates. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-6] Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 32 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(H) SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT Findings of Fact 138. According to previous Act 250 decisions for the project site, the project is contiguous to an existing settlement. See e.g. Findings of Fact for Application No. 4C0391-6 at page 11 (March 1987). Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that this project is contiguous to similar commercial and office operations. [Final decision for this criterion in 44C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(J) PUBLIC UTILITIES Findings of Fact 139. Water will be supplied by the South Burlington Water Department and the Champlain Water District. The Applicant has obtained letters from the South Burlington Water Department and the Champlain Water District stating ability to serve. (See letter from the South Burlington Water Department, dated 1/19/99 and letter from the Champlain Water District, dated 2/9/99) 140. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Joe Weith, Director of Planning and Zoning for the City of South Burlington, stating that the South Burlington Planning Commission approved a sewer allocation of 25,800 gpd for the proposed IDX Expansion Project at its meeting on January 26, 1999. (See Letter from Joe Weith, City of South Burlington, dated 4/22/99) 141. Vermont Gas Systems will provide natural gas to the project site. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Vermont Gas Systems stating ability to serve. (See letter from Vermont Gas Systems, dated 1/18/99) 142. Green Mountain Power will provide electricity to the project site. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Green Mountain Power stating ability to serve. (See letter from Green Mountain Power, dated 1/29/99) 143. Based on the information provided by the Applicant, Green Mountain Power estimates that the total IDX Expansion project will result in an estimated peak demand of 1,300 Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 33 KW. This requirement can be supplied from Green Mountain Power's existing and planned generation sources. (See letter from Green Mountain Power, dated 1/29/99) 144. Telephone service will be provided by Bell Atlantic and Hyperion Communications. Tile Applicant has obtained letters from Bell Atlantic and Hyperion Communications stating ability to serve. (See letter from Bell Atlantic, dated 1/20/99 and letter from Hyperion Communications, dated 4/30/99) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that utility service is available to the project, that an excessive or uneconomic demand will not be placed on such facilities or services, and that the provision of such services has been planned on the basis of a projection of reasonable population increase and economic growth. [No final decision for this criterion yet] SECTION 6086(a)(9)(K) PUBLIC INVESTMENTS Findings of Fact 145. The public facilities located adjacent to the Project Site include: U.S. Route 7 and the University of Vermont Horticultural Farm. The proposed project will not endanger either public investment. 146. The University of Vermont ("UVM") is the sole owner and operator of the UVM Horticultural Farm, which borders the land involved in the IDX expansion project. Although UVM is an adjoining landowner and statutory party, it has chosen not to participate in the District Environmental Commission's proceedings relative to the Act 250 application. UVM has reviewed the proposed project under 9(K) and concluded that the development will not unnecessarily or unreasonably endanger UVM's investment in the Farm or materially jeopardize or interfere with the function, efficiency, or the public's use or enjoyment of, or access to the facility. UVM also confirmed that the Friends of the Horticulture Farm is a non-profit membership organization that is not part of UVM, nor is it authorized to speak on behalf of UVM. (See letter from the University of Vermont, dated 3/23/99) Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project will not unnecessarily or unreasonably endanger the public or quasi -public investments or materially jeopardize or interfere with the public's use or Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 34 enjoyment of any adjacent public investment. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-61 SECTION 6086(a)(9)(L) RURAL GROWTH AREAS Findin,,s of Fact 147. In Application #4C0391-6, the Commission found that this project was not located in a rural growth area because it was contiguous to similar commercial and office operations. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project is not located in a rural growth area because it is contiguous to similar commercial and office operations. [Final decision for this criterion in #4C0391-6] SECTION 6086(a)(10) LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANS Findings of Fact 148. The City of South Burlington has a duly adopted Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Joe Weith, City Manager, stating that the Project conforms to the plan. (See letter from Joe Weith, South Burlington City Manager, dated 3/16/99) 149. The IDX campus is located in a designated Sub -Regional Growth Center under the Chittenden County Regional Plan which encourages the land use proposed by this project. The Applicant has obtained a letter from Arthur Hogan of the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission stating that the project conforms to the Chittenden County Regional Plan. (See letter from Art Hogan of the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, dated 2/16/99) 150. The City of South Burlington has a Capital Budget and Program. As a result of this program, the project will contribute approximately $100,000 in impact fees to offset the impacts of the project on municipal infrastructure owned and operated by the City of South Burlington. Conclusion of Law The Commission concludes that the project conforms with each duly adopted local or regional plan or capital program under Chapter 117 of Title 24. [No final decision for this criterion yet] Re: BDP Realty Associates IDX Systems Corporation Campus Expansion Application #4C0391-9 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Page 35 V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION OF LAW Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, it is the conclusion of this District Environmental Commission that the project described in the application referred to above, if completed and maintained in conformance with all of the terms and conditions of that application, and of Land Use Permit #4C0391 and amendments thereto, will not cause or result in a detriment to public health, safety or general welfare under the criteria described in 10 V.S.A. Section 6086(a). VI. ORDER Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Land Use Permit Amendment #4C0391-9 is hereby issued. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont, this day of 1999. By: Chair, District #4 Commission Commissioners participating in this decision: BI'V\ 126060.6 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633-5001 March 22, 1999 Mr. James Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 I I 1 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4CO391-9 Dear Mr. Boyd: The Vermont Agency of Transportation (VAOT) has reviewed the traffic impact study, submitted to the District Commission as a part of this application and would like to offer the comments relating to Criterion #5 . The VAOT will work cooperatively with IDX to mitigate the traffic impacts of the IDX expansion. Specifically, we propose the following. 1) When IDX expands to a point that 300 employees have been added, a left -turn lane is recommended to be constructed on southbound US 7 (with a left -turn signal head for IDX Dr). The lane and signal improvements are identical to those proposed in the VAOT Shelburne Road reconstruction project. Under VAOT's current schedule, these should be constructed (or have started construction) prior to IDX exceeding 300 new employees. Because of the timing of the VAOT project and the IDX expansion, we see no reason for making any physical changes to the highway prior to our project. The VAOT will cover the full costs of the improvements needed as a part of our project. If the Shelburne Road project is held up, the VAOT will seek to segment the project to construct this portion of the project first. If this is not possible, the VAOT would seek to implement an independent intersection improvement project, with the appropriate signal coordination. 2) The current Shelburne Road signal coordination plan is sufficient for IDX's additional employment. As part of the Shelburne Road (US 7) Reconstruction project, the VAOT will re -coordinate and re -time all of the signals in the corridor. This will significantly improve the traffic progression in the corridor and the level of service on this segment of highway. 3) VAOT supports the development of Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures to mitigate the effects of the peak hour traffic. It is our understanding that IDX has already commenced the development of a TDM plan, working cooperatively with the Chittenden County Telecommunications Relay Service 1-800-253-0191 Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Mr. James Boyd, District Coordinator District Environmental Commission #4 IDX Campus Expansion, Application # 4C0391-9 March 22, 1999 Page 2 Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) and others. I have attached a copy of the VAOT Level of Service Policy, that recognizes that within urban areas we may not always be able to obtain ideal levels of service and that we should look to alternative strategies to maintain capacity on our highway system. In closing I would like to state that the VAOT fully supports the application for expansion and feels that the expansion will not cause safety or congestion problems. The VAOT will be attending the hearing on Tuesday, March 23, 1999 and will be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have at that time. Sincerely, David J. Scott, P.E. Director of Project Development DJS:djs c: Michael Pologruto, VAOT Peter Plumeau, CCMPO Joe Weith, So. Burlington Planner Dale Rocheleau, Downs Rachlin & Martin Richard Ranaldo, VAOT VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY DESIGN "LEVEL OF SERVICE" POLICY Purpose: To define appropriate qualitative measures of performance, for highway design in Vermont. Measures of performance relating to the capacity and Level of Service cfvarious elements of the transportation system used in this policy are as defined in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209). Policy: It is the Agency's policy to design its highways and to require others accessing its facilities to effect improvements that will maintain Level of Service "C" for the prescribed design period. However, given present traffic volumes and in anticipation of substantial future increases in traffic volumes, especially within densely settled areas, reduced Level of Service criteria may be appropriate when approved by the Secretary of Transportation in consultation with the Directors of Engineering and Planning on a case -by case basis. Such a determination should consider at a minimum, the following: ♦ The delay incurred by the traveling public. ♦ The volume -to -capacity relationship. ♦ The negative impacts which may result to the surrounding area, because of improvements which would be required to achieve LOS C. In extreme circumstances, where the existing Level of Service is "F" and where the necessary geometric improvements are not feasible, Level of Service "F" may be acceptable as long as an improvement over existing conditions can be demonstrated. An improvement over thee xisting conditions may include the implementation of travel demand management strategies or alternative transportation improvements. Prior t9 the implementation of any TDM or alternative transportation measures, all tradition traffic engineering approaches should be explored. These would include, but are not limited to, installation of signal, adjustment to signal phasing, modification to existing lane configurations, etc. Examples of alternative strategies/improvements are listed in Attachment 1. The attached listing is not intended to be all inclusive, it is only provided for informational purposes. Preferred mitigation strategies for any particular project or area should be developed by consulting the Town and Regional plans. This policy supersedes the policy dated May 22, 1987. EFFECTIVE DATI�l 7 2-5 " / 1 C- V APPROVED: lean aneck Secretary of Transportation -) DATE: 1 I k 2. 3 4 Vermont Agency of Transportation Design Level of Service Policy Attachment 1 Travel Demand Management Alternative Transportation Strategies Stratezy TYPC Employer/Developer Provides Carpools/vanpools Preferential parking Ride matching onsite Financial incentive Guaranteed ride home Transit Subsidized passes Shuttle from park & ride lot or transit station Guaranteed ride home Work place Showers and bicycle lockers Alternative work schedules Telecommuting Charging for parking On site informational programs Infrastructure Investment Contributions to: Park & Ride Lots Bike/pedestrian Paths Transit Operations NOTE: THIS LISTING IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED ALL INCLUSIVE NOR IS ANY ONE EMPLOYERIDEVELOPER EXPECTED TO MOLEMENT ALL STRATEGIES. k_ OWNS RACHLIN St MARTIN PLLC A T T 0 R N E Y s A T LAW COURTHOUSE PLAZA • 199 MAIN STREET • PO Box 190 • BURLINGTON • VERMONT 05402 0190 +1 802 863 2375 • FAX +1 802 862 7512 March 24, 1999 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: IDX Exterior Lighting Plan Dear Joe: Further to the letter of Deb Sachs on behalf of the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, dated March 15, 1999, a copy of which was provided to you, I thought you would like to have the following update. The March 15 letter from Ms. Sachs commented on several aspects of the IDX exterior light design. Members of the IDX Permit and Design Team met with Deb Sachs and Art Hogan on Wednesday, March 17, to review the suggestions made in the March 15 letter. Furthermore, the IDX lighting consultant prepared a written response dated March 17, which was reviewed during our meeting. I am pleased to report that the issues appear to have been resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. If you have any questions or comments, please give me a call. Sincerely, Dale A. Rocheleau Enclosure cc: Ron Roberts Shelly Russo Brad Carter Deb Sachs Art Hogan BTV\127236.1 ST. JOHNSBURYVT BRATTLEBORO VT LITTLETON NH +1 802 748 8324 +1 802 258 3070 +1 603 444 0216 f#6 r LIGHT❑SPACEODE91GN March 17, 1999 Brad Carter Kessel-Duff Corporation 30 Kimball Ave. Suite 101 South Burlington, VT 05403 Subject: IDY 4CO391-9 Act 250 Review Comments on IDX Outdoor Lighting Dear Brad: I would like to address the following comments in reference to the letter of !March 15, 1999 by Debra Sachs of the Chitttenden Regional Planning Commission. I appreciate the careful review and attention to lighting quality by Ms. Sachs, and have take the comments into consideration. However, I must address what I feel may have been an error in interpreting IESNA standards. I have attached a copy of the pages in the IESNA manual which refer to recommended maintained horizontal illluminances for parking facilities. IESNA recommends against use of average horizontal footcandles in setting guidelines for outdoor lighting. Because of the number of variables involved in calculating an average illuminance level, the recommendation is for minimum footcandles at the pavement along with a uniformity ratio comparing average to minimum footcandles. The guidelines specifies minimum, not average levels for general parking and pedestrian areas of open parking facilities. For medium activity use, including office parks, the minimum footcandles recommended is 0.6 fc. With the recommended average to minimum uniformity ratio of 4:1, the average footcandles under the guideline would be 2.4fc. For vehicular use areas without pedestrian activity, the recommended average for medium use is 1 fc. In all areas of the IDY grade level parking, I have attempted to hold the minimum illuminance to 0.6 footcandles, but in corner areas, there are points below this level. The City of South Burlington imposes a 20 foot height restriction on lighting poles in parking areas. The number of poles used is not excessive, given these constraints. I will be working with Keith Wagner Associates to help ensure that landscaping placement does not interfere with lighting, especially in critical areas. I hope that this clarifies an important issue in the lighting review process. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Donna,-. Leban, AI.3 7 IRIS LANE • S. BURLINGTON. VT 115403 PHONE: 8112-861)-7244 L wGI-iTING DESIGN r ing facilities and for covered parking facilities, it speci- fies minimum levels for the pedestrian areas of open parking facilities. The reason for this is that an abso- lute minimum of lighting is considered necessary for the identification of features or pedestrian safety, which should be achieved at all points. Special Considerations. Lighting of access roads to all types of parking facilities should match the local high- way lighting, as much as possible. The average main- tained illuminance should be compatible with local conditions. The average -to -minimum uniformity ratio should not exceed 3: 1. In all parking facilities, consideration should be given to color rendition, uniformity of lighting and minimizing glare. Users sometimes have trouble identi- fying their cars under light sources with poor color rendering characteristics. Uniformities less than rec- ommended can detract from safety and security. Glare can affect the ability to perceive objects or obstructions clearly. In many parking facilities, closed-circuit television is deemed necessary. When the camera tube is specified, the lighting level, the type of light source, the distribu- tion pattern of luminaires and the aiming of the cam- era must be considered in order to ensure effective results. From the standpoint of energy management, it may be desirable to reduce the lighting levels in certain parking facilities during periods of reduced activity. For example, during peak use, the high -activity lighting levels may be required. During inactive periods only security lighting will be necessary. Special Considerations for Open Facilities. In open parking facilities, exits, entrances, loading zones, pedestrian crossings and collector lanes should be given special consideration to permit ready identification and to enhance safety. Lighting for outdoor pedestrian stairways may re- quire a luminaire on every landing with additional units in between if required for safety. It may be necessary to call attention to changes in elevation where steps are present. Parking facilities for rest or scenic areas adjacent to roadways generally employ lower illuminances. See the subsection on Rest Areas. Support poles should be located so as not to be damaged by automobiles being parked. The overhang of a typical automobile is approximately 0.5-1.0 m (1.5-3.3 ft) in front, and 1.5 m (5 ft) in the rear. Vandalism is an important consideration with open parking facilities. Damage can generally be reduced by mounting luminaires at least 3 m (10 ft) above grade. However, greater mounting heights are recommended. Special Consideration for Covered Facilities. In cov- ered parking facilities, vertical illuminances of objects such as columns and walls should be equal to the horizontal values given in figure 24-23. These vertical values should be for a location 1.8 m (6 ft) above the pavement. In covered parking facilities the design should be arranged so that some lighting can be left on for security reasons. The low level from figure 24-23 for open parking facilities can be used for this purpose. Emergency luminaires in covered parking facilities should be located so as to provide a minimum lighting level in case of an interruption to the normal power supply. In general, these units should provide approxi- mately 10% of the levels in figure 24-23, or applicable local code requirements. Illuminated Roadway Signs' Motorists may stop or reduce speed at roadway signs that are difficult to read, and thus create a hazardous condition. Proper sign lighting can aid rapid and accu- rate recognition of the sign shape, color and message. Lighting for roadway signs becomes more significant as: (1) volume of traffic increases, (2) complexity of highway design increases, (3) likelihood of. adverse weather increases and (4) ambient luminance in- creases. Ambient Luminance. The background luminance against which a sign will be viewed by a motorist is called its ambient luminance. Three categories of ambi- ent luminance (high, medium and low) can be identi- fied: • High: Areas with high street lighting levels and brightly lighted advertising signs • Medium: Areas with small commercial develop- ments and lighted roadways and interchanges • Low: Rural areas without lighting or areas with very low levels of lighting High levels of ambient luminance can make sign light- ing mandatory in order to ensure sign legibility for decisive driver action. Light Source Selection. Energy consumption is a ma- jor consideration that must be balanced by other fac- tors, such as color rendering, ambient temperature and maintenance. Selection should be based on efficacy and lamp life in addition to careful evaluation of color rendering abilities. Lighting must maintain the color rendering as close as practical to that seen under daylight conditions. Illumination Recommendations. There are three types of lighted signs: externally lighted signs, internally lighted signs, and luminous source message signs (where the message is formed by lamps). 772 KUAUWAY LIUH1W,vj low. These levels reflect both traffic and pedestrian activity and are illustrated by, but not limited to, the following examples: High activity: • Major league athletic events • Major cultural or civic events • Regional shopping centers - Fast food facilities Medium activity: - Community shopping centers - Office parks - Hospital parking areas - Transportation parking (airports, commuter lots, etc.) • Cultural, civic or recreational events - Residential complex parking Low activity: • Neighborhood shopping • Industrial employee parking • Educational facility parking • Church parking If the level of nighttime activity involves a large num- ber of vehicles, then the examples above for low and medium activity properly belong in the next higher level. Covered Parking Facilities. Four critical areas can be identified within covered parking facilities: general parking and pedestrian areas; ramps and corners; en- trance areas; and stairways. These critical areas can require lighting both day and night. The first of these areas is considered to be the same as for an open parking facility. The second area is self-explanatory. The third area (entrance) is defined as the entryway into the covered portion of the parking structure from the portal to a point 15 in (50 ft) beyond the edge of covering on the structure. The fourth area again is self-explanatory. Illuminance Recommendations. Recommendations have been established for both open parking facilities (outdoor) and covered parking facilities (structures), as shown in figure 24-23. These recommendations are given to provide for the safe movement of traffic, for satisfactory vision for pedestrians and for the guidance of both vehicles and pedestrians. They are the lowest acceptable levels consistent with the seeing task in- volved and the need to deter vandalism while at the same time meeting energy constraints. Customer con- venience, closed circuit television surveillance and cus- tomer attraction may require a higher level of lighting in some circumstances. In open parking facilities, a general parking and pedestrian area is defined as one where pedestrian conflicts with vehicles are likely to occur. A vehicular use area (only) is defined as one where convicts with pedestrians are not likely to occur. These are areas such as service areas or access roads. It should be noted that, whereas figure 24-23 speci- fies average levels for the vehicular area in open park - Fig. 24-23. Recommended Maintained Horizontal Illuminances for Parking Facilities (a) Open Parking Facilities General Parking and Pedestrian Area Vehicle Use Area (only) Footcandles Level cf Lux (Minimum (Minimum on Uniformity Ratio Lux (Average on Footcandles (Average on Uniformity Ratio Minimum) Activity on Pavement) Pavement) (Average: Minimum) Pavement) Pavement) (Average: High 10 09 4:1 22 2 3:1 3:1 Medium 6 0.6 4:1 11 5 1 0.5 4:1 Low' 2 0.2 4:1 (b) Covered Parking Facilities Day Night Lux (Average Footcandles Lux (Average on Footcandles (Average Uniformity Ratio on Areas Pavement)t (Average on Pavement)t on Pavement) (Average: Minimum) General parking and 54 5 4:1 Pedestrian areas 54 5 54 5 4:1 Ramps and corners 110 10 54 5 4:1 Entrance areas 540 50 Stairways ' This recommendation is based on the requirement to maintain security at any time in areas where there is a low level of nighttime activity. t Sum of electric lighting and daylight. See chapter 11. Illuminance Selection. 1 State of Vermont Z WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 8, 1996 Case Number: WW-4-0442-1 PIN: EJ98-0194 Landowner: BDP Realty Associates Address: 1500 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of constructing a building addition to house 1,775 employees and a 300 seat cafeteria to the existing IDX office building previously approved in Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0442 and Permit #PB-4-1255, served by municipal water and sewer services, located off Shelburne Road in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. This permit does not constitute approval under Act 250 case number 4CO391 & Amendments. GENERAL This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Water Quality Division - Wetlands - phone (802) 241-3770, the Water Supply Division - phone (802) 241- 3400, the Department of Labor and Industry -phone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 658-2199, the Vermont Department of Health - phone (802) 863-7220 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project No. 98051CLC, Sheet SP1 "Master Site Plan" dated 11-12-98 last revised 2-12- 99; Sheet SP2 "Site Plan" dated 11-12-98 revised 3-17-99; Sheet SP3 "Site Plan" dated 11-12-98 revised 2-12-99; and Sheet D5 "Sanitary Details" dated 11-12-98 prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. The project is approved for construction provided there is no occupancy of the building until written notice has been submitted to this office verifying compliance with Condition #4 of Wastewater Management Division - Amended Discharge Permit No. 3-1284 (completion of the improvements to the Bartlett's Bay wastewater Treatment facility). Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0442-1 BDP Realty Associates Page 2 4. No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. 6. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. 7. All conditions set forth in Permit #PB-4-1255 and Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0442 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 8. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY 9. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 10. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources, Water Supply Division's "Public Water System Permit to Construct " Project #E-0913 WSID #5091 to Ronald Roberts dated May 6, 1999. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 11. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal sewer system depicted on the stamped plans for a maximum of 25,800 gallons of sewage per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0442-1 BDP Realty Associates Page 3 12. The municipal sewer collection system, including the proposed manhole, herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont -registered professional engineer who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the subject establishment, report in writing to the Wastewater Management Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the approved plans and permit conditions. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on June 17, 1999. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BY Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc. Act 250 Coordinator - Case 94CO391 & Amendments Water Supply Division Health Department -Food & Lodging Licenses Water Quality Division Department of Labor & Industry PA,,�J -ji 12/8/98 MOTION OF APPROVAL BPD REALTY ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 646 space 3- level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page four (4) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitations to be exceeded along Green Mountain Drive and IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 12 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1394 spaces which represents a 62 space or 4.3% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 24,588 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 11) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12) A determination as to whether or not the project will create an adverse traffic impact is not made at this time. This determination shall be made at final plat. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall do the following: a) Conduct a signal timing/synchronization analysis for the corridor. In addition, a queue length analysis shall be prepared. b) Prepare a plan for the recommended southbound left -turn lane at IDX Drive. c) Amend the traffic impact analysis to include the impact of the Shelburne Road widening project south of IDX Drive. d) Submit a proposal for developing and implementing a transportation demand program (e.g., flex -time, van pool, bus passes, etc.). L ns - i"4 /J'( - J O� 13) The plan shall be revised prior to final plat submittal as follows: a) The parking count information on the cover sheet shall be revised to correct the square footage of office space (363,916 square feet) and the number of spaces required (1456). b) The plans shall be revised such that parking in the northwest corner of the site is shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle/parking area and the proposed no.w., and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. c) The plans shall incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes regarding stormwater management. d) The two (2) survey plats shall be combined into one (1) plat showing the entire property. The property lines to be dissolved shall be noted as such. 2 e) The site plan shall show the zoning boundaries. 0 The landscape plan shall accurately show the r.o.w. taking at the northwest corner of the site. g) The site plan shall include a legend. h) The site plans shall be revised to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. 0, -` ` 4� The applicant shall submit a copy of the plans to the City Water Department for their review. 15) The sewer manhole inverts shall be poured concrete not bricks. 16) All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 17) The applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 18) The final plat submittal shall include information on the height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level from the average pre -construction grade. 19) The applicant shall research whether the legal documents are in place to extend and connect IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. 20. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months. _71t - P Lk5�k, ') Y(" PLANNING COMMISSION 10 NOVEMBER 1998 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 10 November 1998, at 7 30 p.m., in the conference room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chair, John Dinklage, Marcel Beaudin, Dan O'Rourke Roger Farley, Gayle Barone Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; John Caulo, Christina Bielenberg, Mark Hamlin, Paul Duchesneau, Jacqueline Marceau, Tyler Hart, Robert Shand 1. Other Business: Mr. Weith announced that the city had gotten a grant for work on Market Street. 2. Minutes of 22, September, 3 October, 13 October and 27 October: Mr. Beaudin noted he had been present at the 3 October meeting. Ms. Barone moved the Minutes of 22 September, 3 October, 13 October and 27 October as written and amended. Mr. O. Rourke seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Report on recent site plan decisions issued by the Director of Planning and Zoning: a) Site plan application of Peter L. Jacob to convert 2100 sq. ft. of general office use within a 4000 sq. ft. building to medical office use. The 4000 sq. ft. building will now consist of 2100 sq. ft. of medical office use, 1180 sq. ft. of retail use and 720 sq. ft. of general office use. The property also contains a 288 sq, ft. bank ATM building. APPROVED. b) Site plan application of Thomas A. Racine for expansion of an existing parking lot serving an automobile sales and service facility, 1650 Shelburne Road. APPROVED. No issues were raised on either approval. 4. Sketch plan application of BDP Realty Associates to 1) raze a 21,200 sq. ft. general office building, 2) construct a 238,942 sq. ft. addition with a 19,902 sq. ft. connector to an existing 124,208 sq. ft. general office building, 3) construct a 622 space 2-level parking structure, and 4) merge 3 lots into one lot, 1400 Shelburne Road: PLANNING COMMISSION 10 November 1998 Mr. Caulo said the project will be an expansion of IDX. He showed the existing facility and the new 2-acre piece just acquired. The project will include a new multi -story office building similar in look to the existing building. The east wing would have 5 stories of office and a basement. The other wing would have 4 stories but will have the same roofline because of the grade. Mr. Caulo then showed how the parking structure would mix with the grading. The property is located in a C-2 zone and the uses proposed are permitted in that zone. The development results in 3 "front yards" and must therefore satisfy setbacks for 3 sides. This has been done. They also meet the 30% rule in front and back. They are a little over on the side, but they were over originally and the Commission has the power to waive this. They meet all coverage limitation. Mr. Caulo then showed the access patterns. The access on Shelburne Road will be closed and all traffic will access from IDX Drive opposite the shopping center. Employees can also access the site from Green Mountain Drive. The retention pond on the property will be expanded. Mr. Weith asked the applicant to describe the elevation of the top deck of the parking structure in relation to Green Mountain Drive. Mr. Caulo thought the top level would break the plane of Green Mountain Drive. Mr. Weith asked if they had considered accessing the top deck direction from Green Mountain Dr. Mr. Caulo said they had and this might yet happen. Mr. O'Rourke asked if there will be a traffic study done. Mr. Caulo said there would. Mr. Burgess noted a staff comment that one parking aisle does not meet the city standard. Mr. Caulo said that will be corrected. Ms. Bielenberg, representing the Hort Farm, asked what the height of the 5 story wing would be in relation to grade. Mr. Caulo said it would be 24 ft. taller than the roof of the existing building. Ms. Bielenberg then asked how many employees might be entering from Green Mountain Dr. Mr. Caulo said it will get a lot of use. Mr. Weith noted that would be addressed in the traffic study. Mr. Caulo noted that because of the nature of the company, the peak hour of traffic is spread out a bit. They have a lot of west coast clients. Mr. Burgess advised the applicant that the Commission will need to see elevations from all four sides in order to address the height waiver. GREEN \'10l \TAIN 'COWER CO KP(iR.-',,-, GREEN MOL XTAi\ t)1,'I\ E • P.O. rrl\ `:;r'. ! .IN(.!'(t\. VT c;:;2 is • l`C2 �—�-j1 20 January 1999 Ms. Debra Bell, P.E. Trudell consulting Engineers 14 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 RE: Street Lights at IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive IDX Corporation Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington Dear Deb: Thank you for providing GMP with the site plan information for the proposed expansion at IDX. As part of this project, we understand IDX Drive (formerly known as Holmes Road) will be extended approximately 300 feet to the east and will intersect with Green Mountain Drive, will be extended approximately 300 feet to the north. As part of this project, GMP will evaluate the existing street lighting at these locations and additional fixtures may be required, particularly at the new intersection of IDX and Green Mountain Drives. The precise location of these new fixture(s) has not been determined at this time. Please be advised that GMP will install any lights that we currently offer. Further, we will work with the appropriate parties at the local and state level to ensure that lighting requirements are met. If you have additional questions regarding this issue, please contact me. Sincerely. tw-J-4 � &4-� David Murray Field Service Leader cc. Carey Brier John Caulo \lam �,rcrt _• .\:::n.,,n `r...! AIII•Rt\,r.VT:i,>1 ;.,'!,,.{.J!.\\Ti l,'I . .art. \T i .. \�� _, nnc•. \�T '-�, ! LIGHT [IS PACE❑DESIGN January 25, 1999 Mc Tim Duff Kessel Duff Corporation 57 Talcott Rd. Williston, VT 05495 Dear Tim: At this preliminary stage, my recommendations for lighting the interior of the IDX PARKING STRUCTURE are as follows: * Use a sharp cutoff type fixture such as the Gardco GP1, utilizing medium base 175w metal halide lamps. This particular fixture has two particularly important features. One, the faceted downlight reflector system provides an effective rectangular light distribution pattern, while still providing sharp cutoff distribution. Two, the small percentage of uplight component (optional) helps prevent the dark ceiling, or cave effect, that results from downlight only in a parking garage. • The layout of fixture positions will depend upon the construction system selected. In a flat slab configuration, or one in which beams are 20-24' O.C., spacing of the fixtures can be 24' or one per bay. Locate fixtures at the center of the driving lane. As shown in the attached Garage Section Plan View, this arrangement provides an average of 5 footcandles (fc) at the center driving lane, and an overall average of 4 fc. A minimum of 0.6-1.5 fc is found at the outside perimeter of the bay. • With a precast double T construction, the same spacing of the fixtures would provide a lower average light level as shown in the plan comparison. Spacing of 20-24' OC is still adequate in this example. • Plan all garage lighting circuits so that perimeter lighting can be dimmed automatically in stages from photocells located within perimeter driving areas of the garage. This will provide cost effective energy savings throughout the daytime use hours. • Provide an average of 10 fc of lighting both inside and around the perimeter of stairways and exits. Provide a wall wash effect on all vertical interior surfaces of stairways and elevators that face the garage interior. This will help with pedestrian way -fording, and can be integrated with a graphic design to aid in floor level identification. • Provide additional lighting inside garage entrances during daytime hours. 10-15 fc is necessary to aid in adjusting driver vision to darker lighting levels inside the garage. This lighting should be controlled by photocells to turn off at dusk, as it will only be needed during the day. • Avoid pedestrian crossing areas near garage vehicular entrances, both inside and outside. Also, avoid crossing vehicular traffic patterns within the garage wherever possible, especially at entry and exit zones. 7 IRIS LANE • S. BURLINGTON, VT • 05403 PHONE: 802-860-7244 — 2 — JANuAFy 25,1999 As the plans for the garage are formalized, I would be happy to do a final fixture layout and analysis that will conform to these overall guidelines. Sincerely, Donna J. an, AIA 1b lb 43 Garay-e Section Plan View Scale: Scale to Fit IDX Parking Garage Shelburne Road at Holmes Ave Extension, South Burlington, VT LM Light/Space/Design South Burlington, VT 1/25/99 Prepared for: Kessel Duff Corporation Project No.: 98-8 y. ti. ,y. .y ,ti. ti. A. A A, �. 6 A. y. ro. A -_ (p• .y.•. p• y o.,, o e ��P �� h.- o � o o •' � ]�ti ��P to ' � � ra 0 � 4.(b-'h h 0 p. - • P 0 O 9 �. soh O Ay h'-. •. 4� A._... _h•- 2. \ 1. 'A} 'Eb Pi�' o I `L A' of -h' 9A0 'L 6•.. p• p. IN. p• �•0 ,�• p• y ff �' � n � (p• �p� �• ��;.• � 'y' .�� h 10 A' I A'� `o Li��t I!1•� 'Y' � ^ � 7.� � � � 6�0 h �• � A' `'�_ A 6' A' A' AI ^' ��'' 1-' *p� '�P],'\ I, � A n�. A p. of b• p ti ti h. h p• i ,�' p M1 n�A rl,� 1,!1 p• A'\ y' A I'I 6.0 0 � ,' O Ih�i' A• � AA Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com 64 Ln L�T' Shelburne Road at Holmes Ave E#ension, South Burlington, VT Light/Space/Design South Burlington, VT 1/25/99 Prepared for: Kessel Duff Corporation Project No.: 98-8 y• y ti' ti' ti' '0 °' M l a• 3 g' a• h b' y' � 0 s� °f�P,� f 2 44c-y.. 1 ��`L\ A�O. "i'\ y1 _ --: ^�' '3' 430 '�• 1.0 l i I, 1 y' f- `L. ,L. ,L . ,L. ,L. p• I `L I y''.' �" O' 1• I I 0j I I O' 0 "7 °., ti a• ,L' ti' op a �. �. A• ry . o 0• A. a. m ~ �• i O •ti p.. ,:i O A ,j, A' 1 'S A lA' ;�' ,0 A 1�7j `L' I ^11 '� ° ' `L' 'L'. O 'L' '�• 'L i 1,. ti ti' O Output Generated by Lumen Micro 7.5. Copyright 1998 Lighting Technologies, Inc., Boulder, Colorado www.lighting-technologies.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 22, 1999 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 26, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Weith, Director wing & Zoning JW/mcp Encls J ----------- __ _ GREEN MOUNTAIN DR --'.� _ \ ,R are I o-_-'�"'__---�----"--------- ' ---+---_--'----'`�'-----'--1-- ( ll I11 ! 11 I I \ �� //I^�_.% _-44%-. .-.--✓ __ _ '�..-_.. _ __ / (\ / — r _ r r \ - I\ i 1 PROPOSED 3 LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE / l l ,. OJ NYNER. R�EALTY ASSOCIATES BOP f400SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 1 ZONING' COMMERCIAL T J TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 16.67 ACRES / 4 SITE SERVICED BY. MUNICIPAL WATER R SEWER PRIVATE - VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS -_---_ ONfEN MOUNTAIN POWER -D _ IN ERTSCONTRACTOR RI KRIFY UTILITY STUB INVERTS C ON DRIVE NOTIFY TO ANY CONSTRUCTION AND NORFY�iHE ENGINEER, / S. ME ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE AND GAS DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL. THE FINAL LAYOUT PLAN, CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE PREPARED BY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE UTILITY AND THE OWNER i WILL DELINEATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING MATERIALS AND TASKS RELATING TO THE INSTALLATION. TITHE LOCATION OF ANY SUCH UTILITY ON THESE PLANS IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND E MAL PLANS OF THE UTILITY COMPANY WILL GOVERN. 7. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE FOLLOWING: I7Ix RETAINING WALLS B THIS PLAN SHOWS EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASE ON WS E C U DE 0 S D ABOVE GROUND ACTUALA LOCATION AND RECORD DRAWINGS, THE COY TRACTOR SHALLTHTS ANTICIPATE . I ME is ACTUAL LOCH TON OR EXISTENCE OF ANY UTILITY MAY VARY FROM THAT SHOWN. IT D THE CONTRACTORS ATTON BEGIN. TO CONTACT TOR SAFE' TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITYOF / ANYBEFOREDI EXCAVATION BETWEEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY TIE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UTILITIES AS SHOWN AND AS FOUND. / 9. SITE LIGHTNG PLAN PREPARED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. / /CI 10. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE UNINTERRUPTED UTILITY SERVICE TO EXISTING IDX BUILDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. ( IFA True P OF VER • a NO. 3091 MATCHLINE SP2- i 6, MATCHLINE SP2 MATCHLINE SP3 1 PROPOSED /r MATCHLINE SP3 FT' t}\—BUILDING F.E. 180,0 1'ROP05ED BUILDING F.F.E. = 185.0 I ' - -- ------t ------- -- --' -- _ I -w&of So. Burlington /,Y '' k"' • `Y --- ^ DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTING DESCRIPTION PROPOSED EXISTNG I I 1------ - - UTILITIES T]4 I _ !]e -W- _---W ---- CONTOURS O _ _ 1 AND SERVICES ---___-__ i I ' ,-' - UNDERDRAIN -UD- - -UD---- PROPERTY LINE ONE L MIN RIGHT-OF AND SERVICES [y, / \ y��. � S ORM DRAINAGE50 -SD SURVEY it _., • - \ %' ` - ROOF DRAIN SRO-- RD 171 LIQUID OR NATURAL GA _G_ ____G____ EASEMENTS --_--- - I$eaL I 3 •1 /' ... �\. l / I -`'' OVERHEAD POWER __OyP_ ___ O,yp TB . ___ BUILDING SETBACKS I I i I `..'/ \ .-`•-' ��^�- lil / I1 1 I UNDERGROUND POWER _UP&T--�-U -P&T--- AND TELEPHONE SEWER SYMBOLS . MANHOLE 5AORN DRAINAGE I ICLEANOUT suRVEr srMeoLs cn rcH easiN ■ .. T- AR (FOUND) 0 OUTLET DR l �I /^ \ \ �,� \• 11 ._� END SECTION i IRON PIPE (FOUND) 0 VALVE w w CONCRETE MONUMENT -\\ \\ \ `-..J ,66 (FOUND) ■ FIRE HYDRANT ♦ I} \ \ ,,...-- ' ; \ \ \\ _. � STEEL REBAR (FOUND) O WATER WELL iI �.� \ \ \ \ \ ICE CONTROL PON7 f � I � \ \l \\ \\ -�� \ STEEL REBAR � THRUST BLOCK I TIDE CONTROL POINT I � M T PK NAIL ENO C PONT WOODEN O m UTILITY POLE WOODENEN HUB HUB IRON PIPE TO BE SET 0 M7C OR Y -- — i __ _T ,( �w - - - � I S! TRANSFORMER ____________- -__ - ry TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EROSION CONTROL LUMINAIRE SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 SILT FENCE - HAYBALE STONE RIP -RAP 0raphle Scale ° -•, _ ._ _ _ _ Feet 50 0 SO 100 ISO 200 p9qm TL c H Qw xz rp LL 0 yl u" W � p w o=tZZ o u Z W FINAL LO 0 w �m E H Z O Oc Oc Z J O.. Ld 0 H CD (n Z In W 2 f- F Q 0 ■' o SP1 l■ I DX SYSTEMS CORPORATION SOUTH BURLINGTON CAMPUS EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION PHASING SCHEDULE Sitework 0 280'02AUG99 28AUG00 Landscaping 0 90 01 MAY00 04SEP00 Entry Plaza - Auto Court 0 90 01 MAY00 15FEB01 * 04SEP00 Parking Structure 0 160 27SEP01 GMP fit -up 14ksf 77 85 08FEB99 * 04JUN99 GMP fit -up 50ksf 277 95 05APR99 * 16AUG99 Demo 1500 bldg -110 10 01 SEP99 * 14SEP99 Building 200 - Base building - 01 275'I1OSEP99 *!29SEP00 East Wing Fit -up Basement & 29ksf 161 109 01 MAY00 29SEP00 * Fit -up 58 ksf 322 110 29JAN01 * 29JUN01 Fit -up 58 ksf 322 110 30JAN02 * 02JUL02 Building 200 - West Wing w/ 355 240 29JUL02 * 01JUL03 fit -up 64ksf Connecting Link - Base 0 275 1 OSEP99 * 29SEP00 Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor 0 110 020CT00 06MAR01 fit -up 0 110 02JAN01 * 04JUN01 Visioning Center Fit -up KESSEL/DUFF CORPORATION 57 TALCOTT ROAD WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 ff sitework Landscaping Entry Plaza - Auto Court ZVMNMMNMF Parking Structure ANEW GMP fit -up 14ksf GMP fit -up 50ksf /77 Demo 1500 bldg Building 200 - Base building - East Wing Fit -up Basement & 29ksf Fit -up 58 ksf Connecting Link - Base Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor fit -up ZVOMER"7 Visioning Center Fit -up Date 04JAN99 Fit -up 58 ksf Revision For Permit Update OCCUDai Building 200 - West Wing w/ fit -up 641k Checked ApI BC TD BC TD 16,91 KESSEL/DUFF CORPORATION DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION • MANAGEMENT 7 January 1999 Mr. Joe Weith, City Planner South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Final Plat Application BDP Realty Associates for IDX Systems Corporation Dear Joe: As per our recent discussions, I enclose the following information in connection with the above -referenced application: 1. Completed Final Plat application form 2. Five (5) sets of plans (site / landscape / architectural) 3. One (l) reduced set of plans 4. $85.00 fee In addition, I enclose a photometric study prepared by Light Space Design that analyzes the site lighting component of the project and provides the basis of the project's lighting plan. The revised traffic analysis incorporating additional information requested by the Commission is being processed and will be delivered under separate cover. On behalf of IDX, our thanks to you and Ray Belaire for your continued assistance in processing this application. If additional information is required, please advise. Sin erely, John Caulo Vice President enclosures as noted cc: Ron Roberts Shelly Russo P.O. BOX 788, WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 (802) 879-2966 FAX: 879-2967 bi i Z � Z/o D 'L32 s� Z� — 0 0 � v_ ZK1.. —. Loop— r 5' Cro z--- OOOF 11,001, e G? i IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION SOUTH BURLINGTON CAMPUS EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION PHASING SCHEDULE Sitework 130 03MAY99 �01NOV99 Landscaping 40 01 MAY00 23JUN00 ,t Entry Plaza - Auto Court 60 01 MAY00 24JUL00 Parking Structure 160 15SEP00 30APR01 Building 200 - Base building - 260 03MAY99 01 MAY00 East Wing 110 01 DEC99 02MAY00 Fit -up Basement & 29ksf 110 01 DEC00 07MAY01 Fit -up 58 ksf Fit -up 58 ksf 110 03DEC01 07MAY02 01 MAY02 04APR03 Building 200 - Base Bldg & 240 Fit -up - West Wing Connecting Link - Base 260 01JUN99 30MAY00 Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor 110 03JAN00 02JUN00 fit -up Visioning Center Fit -up 110 03JUL00 04DEC00 KESSEUDUFF CORPORATION 57 TALCOTT ROAD WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 Sitework Awa Landscaping Entry Plaza - Auto Court 19 NOW Parking Structure Building 200 - Base building - East Wing Fit -up Basement & 29ksf NNEW Connecting Link - Base Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor fit -up Fit -up 58 ksf Visioning Center Fit -up Fit -up 58 ksf Building 200 - Base Bldg & Fit -up - West Wing Revision Checked I - —L I I I I f I I I I i I I I I I I I DN UP I I 1 I I 4 SP � I � I I I/ I � t I I � 1 n2 P IRKING ACE9 I � � I 1 I � �. 1 � I ` I I I� PARK SP 1 I TiI I I, 8 O O j I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 4 I I i I I 1 I I I I i1.4.11 4 4N.1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN I SCALE- 1:40 z A4.1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN SCALE- 1'-40'-0' a A4.1 f1RST LEVEL PLAN SCME- 1'-40'-0' - Tj 0 U m ti iZ i el EAST WEST SECTION AT PARKING GARAGE SME - 1/16. - 1._0. z 0 z A .F+ . _ ._ S. BURLINGTON VERMONT 12/08/98 3/16 =1'-0 O 4i ^ � � TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. GHK OFFI (:E OF H. KEITH WAGNER LANOSGNPE Aq.NHE�as P J P � P 4i _ ~° a' oR ec a' A PROPOSED GARAGE ELEVS. A9821 FA . IZ'CW% NO D/AI F m TRUDELL GHK OFFICE OF II KEITM WARNER .. CAP[ ARCMITECTE w ' � P O �• s •= %p J °m. Ir'. P: i SOUTH BURUNOTON VERMONT �P NN ►�ANNERE _ N ENGINwL�MS,INC. BUILDING PERSPECTIVE A9521 FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, 1N�. MEMORANDUM IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION EXPANSION, S. BURLINGTON ,VT PROJECT NO. A9821 DATE: November 30, 1998 TO: Robert Howe-, Vermont Dept. of Labor and Industry FROM: Bill Gardner RE: IDX Parking Garage, HC Accessibility Dear Bob, This is a brief memo to confirm our phone conversation of earlier today. The three story parking structure we are planning for the IDX site is to augment on site parking for the employees of IDX. There will be on grade H.C. accessible parking A R ` 1.1 T C r U z spaces ( both regular and van spaces ) situated around the site as close as possible to ■ the different accessible entries per A. D.A. 4.6.2. Because the parking garage serves only this one building / tenant that has on grade accessible spaces adjacent to the P L A N"'"° building, the garage is not required to provide accessible parking spaces on any level. This means an elevator will not be required in the three story parking structure. irvr=_oaS If this synopsis of the conversation is not a correct interpretation of our conversation or is missing information, please let me know as soon as possible. Our design will proceed using this interpretation unless we hear otherwise. Thank -you for your time. Sincerely, Freeman French Freeman William Gardner, A.I.A. cc Jesse Beck, FFF John Caulo, Kessel/Duff 81 MAPLE STREET, P.O. BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 0306 TEL 802/864-6844 FAX 802/860-1815 interoffice MEMORANDUM To: Project Files - IDX Expansion From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: IDX Expansion - Traffic Analysis Date: December 4, 1998 1. A detailed signal optimization analysis and queue analysis should be conducted. The Planning Commission and VAOT have routinely required such analyses for larger projects (e.g., L&M Park and Hannaford developments). 2. Did the traffic analysis assume a fully built out Hannaford development? 3. Section 4.2 of the traffic analysis says that 60% of northbound traffic will use the Green Mountain Drive intersection while only 40% will use the IDX drive intersection. This does not seem to be logical. 4. The zoning ordinance requires that overall intersection LOS be "D" or better and that the LOS for thru movements on the major roadway be "D" or better. The traffic analysis indicates that this requirement will not be met at several intersections including Queen City Park 2005 build and Macintosh Avenue 2005 build. What specifically can be done to bring these intersections into compliance? 5. Report indicates that the Shelburne Road widening project will mitigate adverse traffic impacts from Holmes Road south. The results of the analysis should be submitted. 6. Report recommends adding a southbound left turn lane at IDX Drive when more than 300 employees are added. A design plan should be prepared to show how this improvement would be done and should be incorporated into this application. 7. Report indicates that future problems at Queen City Park Road and Laurel Hill Drive can be mitigated with improved traffic signal timings and/or phasing. What exactly needs to be done and how will this affect signal optimization throughout the corridor? 8. The report recommends the implementation of a transportation demand program. This should be seriously considered. A formal plan should be proposed and monitored as part of this application. 9. The report recommends that "traffic signal offsets and timings be maintained in the corridor to improve coordination between signals". This should be analyzed in detail and presented. Cc: Joe Segale, CCMPO (Idxtraffic) 12/07/98 MON 11:36 FAX 802 660 4079 CCMPO Chittenden County Metropolitan Planni nization Q001 9won Buriovim Chonotm Coemovw 6 "MJuncaon Gsm Town '**kurg Hontingtan .terkho tit«„, Rlcnmwd St. caorQa Sheburre 8auh ow"10ft undsni waatroro wiNl W wln000d w mant Aganov of rraraowwon M+ onrara kwnb" Chlttaidan Launy T`�++Porlalion AutnorKy BurAntiw 1+4matl0nal Airport banal %nrong Comrrmmbn Rail Mustry U.S. oapanrnant or Memo To: Joe Welth, Director, South Burlington Planning and Zoning Fromw Joseph Segale, P.E. "� Senior Transportation Planner, CCMPO Dow December 7, 1998 ws IDX Expansion Traffic Impact Study (November 19, 1998) 100 uit* 22 South Burlington, yet �on= 05403 t302<860-4071 Fax $0216604079 email: ir1f0QCCmp0.org website: www.CCmpo.arrn Per your request, I have reviewed the above referenced report. The methodology used In the analysis is reasonable and appropriate. Although the methodology is sound, I agree with the questions and comments raised in your December 4, 1998 interoffice memo and do not have additional items to be addressed. If you have any questions, please call me at 66(14071. Post-W Fax Note 7671 Date 2 � b Ps9es� TO �0 L w i*l?'(i From C'53, yn P D • two rf _ 0 - Pax; _ �. 7 ^.cmmu, I's urorldnq !opether te, leaf Chilem M , wrtf'J frarivoeetrcn n w. 12-06-1998 13:45Ar1 FR i K,EESEL GUFF CORP SM 679 �967 P. 1 CORPORATIONKESSELJDUFF • Tor Cky Of South Burltnglon Planning Department ATTN: Flay Belaire Fon John Caulo .t"tr'0 Ran Rcberi;5 Ontim 1210ZM Rat: 10X, F—Vansion: SewerAllocafion Request As per your request, i enclose a request for sewer allocation concerning they prOpOsed evansion project at the IOX campus along Sheltxjme Road Given the proposed office and cafeteria uses containe In the Project, the estimated allocation, which is based on Vermont Agency of Natural Resoumes Fnvirorrmntel P/Dtectioa Rules-- Ghaper 1(&Me) is calculated as follows. I. MOO, 209,8003f/200 = 1,049 employees x 159pd/employee 15,735 gaii./per/day 2. Cafehte6a: Stitt seats x 50gpd/seat. = 15,000 gaUper/d.ay 3. Sub "Total: 30,735 gallperkiay 4. Less 20',i: (10% low flow Uures: 10% municipal syst&rT:) - 6 147 galYper/dayp 5. TQiA&. 24,588 galJper/clay Thank you for your continued assistance in proGessing this application, tf additional information is required, please advise. 57 TalcDtt Road mlistc n. verr nono 05495 ph (002)-a 9-2965 fax, (802}879-2967 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: December 8, 1998 Agenda Items Date: November 25, 1998 RAMADA INN HOTEL - WILLISTON ROAD 1. There is an existing sewer main along the east, south and west of the building. This main should be shown. New wing must not infringe upon the easement for this main. 2. Water mains and water and sewer service lines should be shown, also drainage system. DORSET LAND COMPANY - DORSET STREET Site plan prepared by Trudell Engineering dated 11/4/96 with latest revision dated 11/16/98 is acceptable. IDX - IDX DRIVE - GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE 1. Site plan should include a legend. 2. The sewer manhole inverts should be poured concrete not bricks. 3. City Water Department should get a copy of plans involving water mains for their review. 4. Extended streets shall include street lights. TIMBERLAKE ASSOCIATES - WILLISTON ROAD Site plan prepared by Scott Mapes with latest revision dated 10/28/98 is acceptable. 1 D�F?gFT MOTION OF APPROVAL BPD REALTY ASSOCIATES 12/8/98 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 646 space 3- level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot, as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page four (4) entitled, "IDX South Burlington Vermont Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, et al, dated 11/12/98, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of zoning permit for the first phase or start of utility or road construction, all appropriate legal documents including easements (e.g., irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the proposed public road extension and utility, sewer, drainage and water, etc.) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington land records. 3) Prior to start of construction of the improvements described in condition #2 above, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of said improvements. 4) In accordance with Section 301.5 of the subdivision regulations, within 14 days of completion of required improvements (e.g., roads, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, etc.) the developer shall submit to the City Engineer, "as -built" construction drawings certified by a registered engineer. 5) Pursuant to Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard coverage limitations to be exceeded along Green Mountain Drive and IDX Drive. 6) Pursuant to Section 26.406(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission modifies the front yard setback requirement along Green Mountain Drive to allow the proposed parking structure to be within 12 feet of the front property line. 7) Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) ofthe zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a total of 1394 spaces which represents a 62 space or 4.3% waiver. This waiver is based on a total floor area of 363,916 square feet and excludes the 20,476 square foot building connector/cafeteria space. 8) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $257,950 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 9) Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a building height of 68 feet above the average pre -construction grade. 10) The Planning Commission approves an additional sewer allocation of 24,588 gpd (includes 20% reduction allowed by State). The applicant shall be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The allocation granted shall be placed on a waiting list until such time as the allocation is available. No Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance will be issued until such time as sewer capacity is available. 1 l) For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 565 additonal vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 12) A determination as to whether or not the project will create an adverse traffic impact is not made at this time. This determination shall be made at final plat. Prior to final plat, the applicant shall do the following: a) Conduct a signal timing/synchronization analysis for the corridor. In addition, a queue length analysis shall be prepared. b) Prepare a plan for the recommended southbound left -turn lane at IDX Drive. c) Amend the traffic impact analysis to include the impact of the Shelburne Road widening project south of IDX Drive. d) Submit a proposal for developing and implementing a transportation demand program (e.g., flex -time, van pool, bus passes, etc.). 13) The plan shall be revised prior to final plat submittal as follows: a) The parking count information on the cover sheet shall be revised to correct the square footage of office space (363,916 square feet) and the number of spaces required (1456). b) The plans shall be revised such that parking in the northwest corner of the site is shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle/parking area and the proposed r.o.w., and that this green strip be adequately landscaped. c) The plans shall incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes regarding stormwater management. d) The two (2) survey plats shall be combined into one (1) plat showing the entire property. The property lines to be dissolved shall be noted as such. 2 e) The site plan shall show the zoning boundaries. f) The landscape plan shall accurately show the r.o.w. taking at the northwest corner of the site. g) The site plan shall include a legend. h) The site plans shall be revised to include street lights along IDX Drive and the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. i) The parking structure design shall be revised to include at least two (2) elevators. 14) The applicant shall submit a copy of the plans to the City Water Department for their review. 15) The sewer manhole inverts shall be poured concrete not bricks. 16) All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. 17) The applicant shall provide lighting information within the parking structure. Proposed lighting shall meet the guidelines in the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" booklet. 18) The final plat submittal shall include information on the height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level from the average pre -construction grade. 19) The applicant shall research whether the legal documents are in place to extend and connect IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive. 20. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Dorset Hotel Associates to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 21,750 square foot general office building, 184 unit congregate housing facility, and a 79 unit extended stay hotel, 401 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of relocating and adding a dumpster and revising the parking layout. 2) Preliminary plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of a 354,520 square foot general office use facility and a 620 space parking structure. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission November 21, 1998 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 or 660-9119 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL (FIRM2555C(DFIRMSPF.COM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER WRITER'S E-MAIL (TEUSTACE a FIRMSPF.COM) (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N_Y ) WRITER'S FAX (802) 660-2552 May 31, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Molly K. Lebowitz, Esq. Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew 209 Battery Street PO Box 988 Burlington, VT 05402-0988 Robert H. Rushford, Esq. Gravel And Shea 76 St. Paul Street PO Box 369 Burlington, VT 05402-0369 RE: BDP Realty Associates - Holmes Road Extension Dear Molly and Bob: JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE MIA KARVONIDES AMANDA S.E. LAFFERTY Enclosed please find revised, black -line versions of the Amended Offer of Dedication and Replacement Warranty Deeds for the BDP Realty portion of the Holmes Extension. I have incorporated the changes requested by Molly in her May 24, 2000 letter, with one exception. I have not included a reference to the September 9, 1991, Warranty Deed from South Burlington to BDP Realty Associates (Vol 317, Page 210). In that conveyance to- BDP, the City reserved for itself a twenty-four foot by forty foot parcel which lies within the Holmes Road Extension right-of- way. For reference, see paragraph 3 of the property description contained in the aforementioned Warranty Deed beginning at line 8. In addition, I enclose a portion of the plan entitled "Boundary and Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," dated August 1986, last revised February 13, 1987, and prepared by Krebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. This plan clearly shows the property retained by the City in the context of this prior conveyance. Note that the plan incorrectly references Volume 126, Page 20 for the retained property (the correct reference is Volume 126, Page 289). This plan was referred to in the September 9, 1991 Warranty Deed, but was never recorded. Molly K. Lebowitz, Esq. Robert Rushford, Esq. May 31, 2000 Page 2 Please give me a call if you have any additional questions or comments. If the revised documents are satisfactory, I will send the originals for execution. Thank you. Sincerel 7, Timothy M. Eustace THE/bjl Enclosure cc: Raymond Belair Son4325.cor AMENDED IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION Agreement made this day of , 2000 by and between BDP Realty Associates, a Vermont general partnership with a place of business in South Burlington, Vermont (hereinafter "Owner") and the City of South Burlington, (the "City"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on October 28, 1986, the City Planning Commission approved a Site Plan entitled: "Boundary Location Survey, BDP Realty Associates, 1500 Shelburne Road" dated August 1986, and prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission required Owner to convey to the City, lands depicted on the above -referenced plat as "BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres" for a portion of a city street; and WHEREAS, by written decision dated February 9, 1999, the City Planning Commission approved a final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development as depicted on a 19 page set of plans, page three (3) entitled "IDX, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Site Plan," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., et al., dated November 12, 1998, last revised January 18, 1999; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission contains a condition that the Owner shall execute and deliver to the City an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication and accompanying deed for the proposed public roadways; and WHEREAS, the Owners executed an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication dated April 26, 1988 and recorded in Volume 261, Page 125 of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Irrevocable Offer"), and delivered a Warranty Deed (the "Deed") to the City for the dedication of a portion of its lands for a city street; and WHEREAS, the City, by entering into this Amended Irrevocable Offer, confirms that it rejected the terms of the Irrevocable Offer and did not accept the Deed for the roadway described in said Offer; WHEREAS, pursuant to the final approval of the plat, the Owner now proposes according to the terms of this Amended Irrevocable Offer to dedicate to the City, free and clear of encumbrances, the right of way roadway described above; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the City replacement Warranty Deeds (the "Replacement Warranty Deeds") for the dedication of the land for roadways set forth in this Amended Offer. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City Planning Commission's final approval, in further consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars paid by the City to the Owners, for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. The Owner herewith delivers to the City Replacement Warranty Deeds, a copy of which is set forth as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, said delivery being a formal Offer of Dedication to the City, to be held by the City until the acceptance or rejection of such Offer of Dedication by the City Council. 2. The Owner agrees that said Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication is irrevocable and can be accepted by the City at any time. 3. This Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and be binding upon the Owner and its respective successors and assigns. 4. By executing this Amended Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, the City hereby quitclaims any right, title and interest in and to the roadways described in Exhibit A of the April 26, 1988 Irrevocable Offer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this document as of the day first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES By: Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Its Duly Authorized Agen At , in said County and State, this day of 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: IN PRESENCE OF: NZ Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Its Duly Authorized Agent At , in said County and State, this day of , 2000, personally appeared as duly authorized agent of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON and acknowledged this instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: Son170.rea EXHIBIT A REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point in the east line of Shelburne Road; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 40 feet, more or less to a point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed; thence continuing in a straight line 432.41 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 33112" W 47.60 feet, more or less, to the southeasterly corner of property to be conveyed; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29134" W 432.51 feet more or less to a point 40 feet east of the easterly sideline of Shelburne Road; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 180 02147" E 26 feet, more or less, to the point marking the northwest corner of property to be conveyed. Meaning and intending to convey the first westerly most 432.41 feet of Grantor's interest in Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES (Witness) By: Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 97 EXHIBIT B REPLACEMENT WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, a Vermont general partnership having a place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars paid to its full satisfaction by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a Vermont municipality in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, (the "Grantee"), by these presents does freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY and CONFIRM unto the said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of property in South Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: A parcel of land located in the easterly side of U.S. Route 7, also known as Shelburne Road, and being a portion of the lands and premises depicted as "Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from BDP Realty Associates to the City of South Burlington, Area = 0.875 acres," on a plan entitled "Boundary Survey, BDP Realty Associates, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998 and recorded in Map Volume 430, Page 32 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Beginning at a point on the northerly boundary of Grantor's property 472.41 feet easterly of the northwest corner of Grantor's property; thence proceeding S 720 21126" E a distance of 386.75 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Grantor's property; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 180 00150" W a distance of 67 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 690 29' 34" W a distance of 387.94 feet, more or less, to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 18' 33112" E 47.60 feet, more or less to the place of beginning. Meaning and intending to convey all of Grantor's remaining interest in the easterly portion Holmes Road Extension as depicted on the above -referenced plan. Being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to BDP Realty Associates by Quitclaim Deed of Hatco Associates dated July 5, 1979 and recorded in Volume 141, Page 233 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Reference is hereby made to the aforementioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said granted premises, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, to its own use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner of the premises, and has good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, that they are FREE FROM EVERY ENCUMBRANCE; and it hereby engages to WARRANT AND DEFEND the same against all lawful claims whatever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, by its Duly Authorized Agent, hereunto sets its hand this day of . 2000. IN THE PRESENCE OF: BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES (Witness) By: Its Duly Authorized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At , in said County, this day of 2000, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES, and he/she acknowledged the within instrument, by him/her signed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES. Son172.b.rea Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 3 Reproduced by Reprographii--i of Ncw England. Inc.. S. ISurlinglon. VT. by the fixed line pholographic process. a ` 4 Cb C ' - \ �•Yt \��\\\\ 6 \ 1 \ 1 i 1. i t •.b � _ � . i FR City of So. B ' FAX NO. 1 e02 656 4748 May. 30 2000 01:66PM P1 I'.j`at';§ R ..a. .;� .�y-" - '. �:'%�.; . '.'.wi f�m-•'rr,..«i�SJf;: .!•. - • �. `,i it �' � •,r;:s�`°"fjt: •'i-�-"a-:'-''.:.'�'-� -. ..; t.' � � 4 I " a� ��,�'�' •.A'{•'�':F�iTT rd' �M,;: y ti' •�%...• •:Tr�. {� .<r`"; •.� .:`(r.iR.Va \_..•�{'£j'.w fff 1V ��\:ij.a~ f .�'� �,.n� W.' i'.. � {•�1: �^, �:�•q.�r�5w a;Y}_}��}_d.�uz11 S•::. i.�.� 9•R�C. .1.�."s,.'••�••�i:• :;�;�' .. !I�', i� !t 45 I _ 1114 /ond �etoined by � City Of SOaih L-/ingtan� (zsoo� \ Area = O.Ozi acres I' Ib2'4o E /.26/20 h ) �\ i i 7 .Io7 70. zer_ O 48 ' to 99 'R.QW si z'aT''w wale Post -It'° F Note aite a pAax 7671 � 3 ► To '•1 C,� Frimn Co Phone 1t Phone * NIX N Fex # I al HOLMES s EIVUE kAil! City of So B FAX N8. 1 802 658 4748 )May. 30 2000 O1'07PM P2 I rd 4f . `v..:li'I9tfl�' R7 Au easement re i:. :.6bord squished bt/le.. of... Of -Trustee st ! ted i�ebruor of U�ivers%ty y /7, l9P, A6 1legml docc�i»ents I recoiled. i YMA !01$ gG E Ib Leaenor �f "i i s I08' •• comb...-- ProPCrly lee , right O f j ✓B �?2 47'IY -; - iroverse pant �y . �� k Iron Aloe found a + Iron pipe to be set P , C017creie mboument found a �S/4.281 Deeded dislonce c �n7c, pops N1B°0247"�to CM 7__. — •a. Revised 2- ,M City of So. B i I { CI .a.. f fA FAX NO. : 1 802 658 4748 May. 30 2000 01:07PM P1 ! i /. A closad traverse survey wos completed on October 28, 1985 using is e%ctronic distance meter and a stee/ tape. 2. All bearings are referenced to magnetic north, which is 1,50 west of true north. .3 Original outside boundary monumentalion wos used to recrern'e internal /ots. Some of the recovered monumentolion did not agree with pert n,-ler monuments_ The fe//owing monumentatioo was used cos record evidence for co/culat ws . /P // - I" solid steel rod found in rant of triple 30" maple CM UVN / concrete r7v,7. found at N.W cor, of ROW to 0V" Mort. f`orr» C/r13 - concrete rran. taund on o/d north line of 70 ' ROW ,ot /.5 - concrete n707, fowd on North //ne of 80P Rea/ity. CM 2 - concrete man_ found of N.E. corner City of South Burlington An _ 314"iron pipe w1survey marker cap fot no, at SW cor, former �Ibelendy pit CM - concrete mw fourd of SW car Racine$ ✓cep .,_ Gbmmlon Reality Corp, /0 Mationa/ Clfe Insurance Co. ,34 97 National Life Insurance Co. to City of South Burlington 126 ;89 Notional Life Insurance a rr/op, by Webster- - Mart;7 Inc. proja ct no. 58/- dale d June 12, ' 1973 - /015 Survey of Thomas Farrel! Property by George Bedard Feb /4, 1986. Stole of Vermont Oeaartment of Highways , US Route T Proposed "korowments ST O19 - 4 - 6247 Property Plan Hose/ton and Farrel!, Sheleurne Rd South Burlington by Wcr,-ren Robenste/n Nov /974 /07 post -It, Fax Nota 76/1 Daft jb TI In U TI J /� From Co./Dept CO. Phone # Phone It Fax # Fax # PLANNING COMMISSION 8 SEPTEMBER 1998 PAGE 2 c. Site plan application of Joe Eddy Holding LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 14,000 sq. ft. building for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses for a multiple number of tenants. The amendment consists of making landscaping and site modifications, 41 Commerce Avenue. APPROVED. The Chair asked if anyone on the Commission or in the audience had any issues to raise on these decisions. None were forthcoming. 3. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of BDP Realty_ notes to modify the configuration of two parcels that were originally approved by the by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/73, 1400 and 1500 Shelburne Road: Mr. Rushford, attorney for BDP Realty, said that in 1973 National Life did a plan that set out 18 lots. The plan was not recorded within the 90 day limit. Last year, the Planning Commission reapproved the plan and said any changes that had been made would have to be reapproved by the Commission. This application sets out to do that. The changes include a 70 foot right-of-way that was given to BDP and was combined with lot B, and the conveying of land for the Holmes Road Extension. No issues were raised. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the final lat application of BDP Realty Associates to modify the configuration of two parcels that were originally approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on .1/23/73 1400 and 1500 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plat entitled, "Boundary Survey BDP Realty Associates Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30 1998 with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded b, this is approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any change to the final plat shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be sipned by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording_ Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION 8 SEPTEMBER 1998 page 3 Ms Barone seconded. The motion was passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Final plat application of Allson Partnership and BDP Realty, Inc., to modify the configuration of several lots, in particular lots 11 and 12, that were originally created in an 18 lot subdivision approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/73, 40 and 50 Green Mountain Drive: Mr. Conard, attorney for Allson Partnership said this is a similar situation to the one above. The property lies south of the BDP property. Lot 11 is to be conveyed to BDP. The goal is to do a comprehensive layout of lots as they exist now, including the merger of lots 3 and 5 (Toyota Dealership) and the moving of the northerly boundary of lot 912 3.5 ft. to the north. Mr. Weith said the plan represents the reality of what is there. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Allson Partnership and BDP Realty Inc to modify the configuration of several lots, in particular lots #11 and 12 that were originally created in an 18 lot subdivision approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/73, 40 and 50 Green Mountain Drive, as depicted on a plat entitled "Composite Parcel Plan Heritage Group Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Pinkham Engineering Associates, Inc, dated 8/26/98, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded b this his approval shall remain in effect. 2 The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning Three copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. a) The final plat shall be revised to note that the "old" property lines are to be dissolved. 3. Any change to the final plat shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4 The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording, the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the City Planner. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously Preliminary Memo - Planning December 8, 1998 agenda items November 20, 1998 Page 2 — the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is zero (0). — applicant should reduce the size of the freestanding sign. — will the access connection to 4 Market Street be opened as part of this project? — applicant should provide pedestrian connections to the 100 Dorset Street/4 Market Street properties. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - OFFICE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT provide perimeter survey of entire property stamped by land surveyor (all 3 lots merged into one). site plan should include property line distances. site plan should show the zoning boundaries. the parking count information on the cover sheet should be revised to correct the square footage of office space and the number of spaces required. Parking is based on gross floor area/250 (384,329 square feet/250 = 1538 spaces). this project requires 1538 spaces and 1394 spaces are provided. This represents a 144 space or 9.4% shortfall. Applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. provide parking layout for all levels of parking garage. —� a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253 (b) of the zoning regulations. —'� provide front yard coverage information along each of the three (3) front yards. IDX Drive and extended Green Mountain Drive should have street trees on both sides of the road as required under Section 412.4 of the subdivision regulations. provide an inventory of proposed exterior lights to include the number, type of lamp, wattage and pole height. Lighting details provided are confusing and difficult to read. Please clairfy. stake mounted floodlights are proposed. Only downcasting shielded fixtures are acceptable. show screened dumpster locations, if dumpsters will be used. provide additional sewer allocation requested. Applicant should be aware that there is currently no sewer allocation available at this time. Approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. The Commission's policy has been that a permit can not be issued until allocation is available. Allocation is projected to be available at the end of July, 1999. This issue will need to be discussed with the Commission. 2 Preliminary Memo - Planning December 8, 1998 agenda items November 20, 1998 Page 3 a traffic impact study should be submitted. the proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement. ✓ The Planning may waive this requirement under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. applicant should submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel & Noyes for inclusion into the City's storm water hydrology computer model. The final plat plans should incorporate their recommendations. applicant should research whether the legal documents are in place to extend IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive and make the connection. landscaping plan shows retaining wall and parking within the proposed Shelburne Road r.o.w. These should be moved out of the no.w. -`� parking structure should meet the design guidelines for parking structures (see enclosed). provide the maximum building elevation from pre -construction grade. plans should show all HVAC units, cooling towers and electrical transformers. 3 'ROPOSED UGH-1 3CLLARDS (QTY 121 � I ()0 WATT -METAL HALIDE LUMINAIRES MOUNTED AT 434 HGT. AS MANUFACTURED 3Y BEGA 'NAiL LJGI-M (QTY: 9) 27 WA77 R-OURESaNT WMINAIRES WALL -MOUNTED AT APPROX. 2 FT. HGT. AS MANUFACTURED BY BEGA STAKE --MOUNTED UPUGHTS ;Q7'- 3' 100 WATT HALOGEN AS !MANUFACTURED SY BEGA 04 SURFACE -MOUNTED UPIJGHM 3, 100 WATT METAL HALIDE AS MANUFACTURED BY LUMEC POLE LIGHT (QTY: 44): EAST. POLL LIGHT TO REMAIN (QTY: 9) 175 WATT METAL HALIDE 250-400 WATT METAL HALIDE SINGLE -MOUNTED INFINISPHERP SINGLE-MOUNTED'INF]NtSPHERP LUMINARES MOUNTED AT 20 Fr. HGT. LUMINARES MOUNTED AT 20 Fr. HG7, AS MANUFACTURED BY EWO AS MANUFACTURED BY EMCO ENVIRONMENTAL LIGHTING ENVIRONMENTAL LIGHTING NOTE: LIGHTING PLAN TO BE REVIEWED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHuK7 FOR APPROVAL UJ PLANT LIST DECIDUOUS TREES OHKW 7/"8 SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COND AR 17 Acer rubrum RED MAPLE 4 1/2' - 5' CAL. B&B FS 51 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Patmore' PATMORE GREEN ASH 4 1/2' - 5' CAL. B&B MB 43 Malus baccata SIBERIAN CRAB 3 1/2' - 4' CAL. B&B GT 33 Gleditsia triacanthos'Shademaster' HONEYLOCUST 7' CAL. B&B GT 40 Gleditsia triacanthos'Shademaster' HONEYLOCUST 4 1/2' - 5' CAL. B&B AS 6 Acer sacharum SUGAR MAPLE 4 1r2' - 5' CAL. B&B BA 22 Betula alba WHITE BIRCH 16'-18' HGT. B&B BA 6 Quercus palustrus PIN OAK 4 1R' - 5' CAL. B&B AC 21 Amelanchier canadensis SHADBLOW 8'-10' HGT. B&B PA 3 Platanus x acerifolia LONDON PLANETREE 4 1/7' - 5' CAL. B&B EVERGREEN TREES SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME` - SIZE COND PA 1 Picea abies NORWAY SPRUCE 18.20' HGT. B&B PA 31 Picea abies NORWAY SPRUCE 8'-10' HGT. B&B PNE 54 Pinus ni q ra AUSTRIAN PINE 8'-10' HGT. B&B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SYM I QTY I SCIENTIFIC NAME VC 1 17 lViburnum cassinoides EVERGREEN SHRUBS SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME is 600 Juniperus sar enti EV 200 Euonymus ve etus Sarcoxie--. PERENNIALS AND GROUND COVER WITHEROD VIBURNUM 1 30'- 36' HGT COMMON NAME SIZE SARGENT JUNIPER 18%24' HGT BIGLEAF WNTERCREEEPER 18% 24' HGT �3&5`- = �1Sy540 �`5 4t3U �= .ID _ --- -. __ B&B P �D COND _ B&B SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COND HS 250 Hosta ssp. HOSTA i YR. OLD 1 GAL. OC 100 Osmunda cinnamomea CINNAMON FERN 2 QUART PA 100 Polystichum acrostichoides CHRISTMAS FERN 2 QUART PA 600 Pachysandra terminalis PACHYSANDRA 2 QUART FLAT TRANSPLANTED TREES (EXISTING) T 7 35 Varies 4--5- CAL. FLAT a- 1 " w lT Ake ... g— j ;+., 7 �� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 September 30, 1998 Robert H. Rushford, Esquire Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 1400 & 1500 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Rushford.- ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the September 8, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Interim Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp I Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 November 20, 1998 John Caulo Kesse[Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed are my preliminary comments on the above referenced project. Comments from City Engineer William Szymanski and the Fire Department will be sent to you when they are available. Please respond to these comments with additional information and'or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, November 30, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer and J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RIB/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning Re: November 10, 1998 agenda items Date: November 6, 1998 3) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING'S REPORT Enclosed are the Findings of Fact and Decision for the following site plan applications: a) Site plan application of Peter L. Jacob to convert 2100 square feet of general office use within a 4000 square foot building to medical office use, 205 Dorset Street. The 4000 square foot building will now consist of 2100 square feet of medical office use, 1180 square feet of retail use and 720 square feet of general office use. The property also contains a 288 square foot bank ATM building. APPROVED b) Site plan application of Thomas A. Racine for expansion of an existing parking lot serving an automobile sales and service facility, 1650 Shelburne Road. APPROVED 4) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 238,942 square foot addition and a 19,902 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 622 space 2-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot. The 124,208 square feet building was approved on 12/15/87 (minutes enclosed). Several minor site modifications have been made since 1987. This application will be treated as a planned unit development. This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the north by IDX Drive, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the south by an auto dealership. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided by a 32 foot and 45 foot curb cut on IDX Drive and a 24 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. The applicant proposes to: 1) eliminate the Shelburne Road curb cut, 2) extend IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive, and 3) construct a new 24 foot curb cut on Green Mountain Drive. Memorandum - Planning November 10, 1998 agenda items November 6, 1998 Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 13.5% (maximum allowed is 30% and should include parking garage). Overall coverage is 66.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage information for each of the three (3) front yards should be provided with the preliminary plat submittal. The existing building and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Green Mountain Drive. The applicant is seeking a waiver from the front setback requirement as provided under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. Staff does not see a problem with granting this waiver. Parking: A total of 1533 spaces are required and 1396 spaces are provided including 24 handicapped spaces. This represents a 137 space or 8.9% shortfall. It is the applicant's position that the 29,140 square feet used for storage and the 19,902 square feet of building connector space should not be used for parking calculation. If these square footages are not included in the calculation, a total of 1337 spaces are required or 59 spaces more than required. A bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Staff does not see a problem with granting a waiver since the Commission has granted up to 8% waivers for multiple story general office buildings in the past. The parking space aisle for the spaces located north of the words "213 parking spaces" does not meet the 24 foot width requirement. The preliminary plat submittal should include the parking layout for both levels. Landscanin&. The preliminary plat submittal should show all existing and proposed landscaping. The proposed landscaping should meet the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District BBW): This property is located in the BBW District. Under Section 23.20 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. Building height: A waiver from the height limitations under Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations will be required. Building elevation plans for all four (4) sides of the proposed 2 Memorandum - Planning November 10, 1998 agenda items November 6, 1998 addition should be submitted with the preliminary plat submittal. Sewer: The preliminary plat submittal should include the sewer allocation request. There is no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. Traffic: The preliminary plat submittal should include a traffic impact study. Dumpster: All dumpster storage areas should be screened. Lighting_ The preliminary plat submittal should include details (cut -sheets) for all existing and proposed exterior lights. Locations of all exterior lights should be shown on the plan. Lot merger: A lot merger agreement, approved by the City Attorney, should be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans which merges lots A, B and the recently acquired lot #11 from Allson Partnership. 5) BURUNGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - LANDSCAPING MODIFICATION - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a plan approved on 2/11/97 (minutes enclosed) to construct a 13,240 square foot addition to an existing 72,625 square foot airport terminal building, 2) construct a multi -level parking structure for 1143 vehicles, and 3) construct new employee and long term surface parking areas. The amendment consists of modifying the approved landscape plan by reducing the amount of new landscaping. Landscaping The minimum landscaping requirement for this project was $129,050. This requirement includes the shortfall on four (4) previously approved projects. The landscaping plan approved on 2/11/97 met this minimum requirement Staff inspected the landscaping prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and discovered that the landscaping planted was different and included less plant material than that shown on the approved plan. A temporary C.O. was issued pending the outcome of this request. The planted landscaping may meet the minimum dollar requirement, however, it is substantially less than what was proposed on the approved plan. The applicant submitted a summary of their 3 Memorandum - City Engineer November 10, 1998 agenda items November 5, 1998 Page 2 2. Butler Farms development and Oak Creek development are sewered temporarily with pumping stations that pump to the Lane Press pumping station. From there, the sewage is pumped to Kimball Avenue. The sewer master plan for sewer mains in the area is straight northerly to the Dorset Park development. This would be all by gravity and the Butler Farms and Oak Creek pumping stations be eliminated to do this will require about 2500 feet of gravity line to be constructed across the easterly edge of the Calkins property which the City now owns. Until this is done, adding more flow to the existing pumping stations should not be permitted because these stations are already operating at capacity. 3. Old Cross Road future extension across this development should have horizontal curve alignment sufficient for a 50 m.p.h. design speed. 4. A 20 foot sewer easement should be included across existing lot # 1 to the Chittenden property to the south. 5. A water main should be extended to serve this development. 6. The sight distance looking north is very limited for the planned road. This should be checked. The State Highway Department should also be consulted because Hinesburg Road is a State maintained road. 7. The proposed private road should have a curve instead of the 90 degree bend. IDX EXPANSION - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. This proposed expansion is within the Bartlett Brook watershed. The storm water retention requirements shall conform with the Heindel & Noyes report. 2. The Shelburne Road improvements include a jughandle connecting to Holmes Road Extension (IDX Drive). A triangle of land approximately .3 acres in size is required from the north-west corner of the IDX property. This land taking should be shown on the plans. 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802)658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 November 6, 1998 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 10, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. 1 Joe Njeith, Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 10, 1998 agenda items Date: November 5, 1998 1) Jeffrey Peck 12 Palmer Court Acceptable 2) Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive Acceptable 3) Robert Shand 5 Ethan Allen Drive Acceptable 4) Edward & Jacqueline Marceau 1545 Hinesburg Road Hydrants should be proposed to provide fire protection 5) IDX 1400 Shelburne Road Acceptable Dated 8/28/98 Dated 9/30/98 Dated 9/24/98 Dated 10/2/98 1 Dated 11/2/98 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802) 658-7955 September 25, , 1998 Robert H. Rushford, Esquire Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 1400 & 1500 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Rushford : ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on September, 8, 1998 (effective 9122198). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plan be recorded within 90 days (12121198). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, Interim Director of Planning and Zoning Mlincp 1 Encl MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: December 16, 1997 agenda items Date: December 12, 1997 2) Consent agenda: IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION - SITE MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a plan previously approved on I2/15/87 (minutes enclosed), last revised on 5/27/97 (minutes enclosed) for a 120,000 square foot general office building. The amendment is to: 1) construct 120 lineal feet of sidewalk, and 2) install a cooling tower with associated landscaping. The only issues affected by this amendment are overall coverage and landscaping. This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the south by an office building, on the north by a shopping center and undeveloped property, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the west by Shelburne Road. Coverage: Overall coverage is 50% (maximum allowed is 70%). Landscaping_ The proposed landscaping has an estimated value of $22,920. Recommended conditions: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $22,920 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3) The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. Memorandum - Planning December 16, 1997 agenda items December 12, 1997 Page 2 4) The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new sidewalk. 5) Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON - WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION - SITE PLAN This project consists of expanding the flow capacity of the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility from 800,000 GPD to 1,250,000 GPD. This expansion will include new tanks, buildings and outfall and renovation of existing tanks and buildings. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 2/21/95 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 15 Bartlett Bay Road lies within the Municipal District. It is bounded on the east by the Central Vermont Railway no.w., on the south by Bartlett Bay Road, on the west by a single family residence, and on the north by undeveloped property. Access/circulation: The existing access is via a 20 foot curb cut on Bartlett Bay Road. No changes proposed. Circulation is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 10.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 35.7% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 21% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $12,000 which is not being met. The applicant is seeking a credit for the $11,520 shortfall. Proposed landscaping includes six (6) Arborvitae shrubs. Staff recommends granting the credit due to the extensive amount of trees located at the southwesterly portion of the site. Parking: There are no minimum parking standards for this type of facility in the zoning 2 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 September 4, 1998 Robert H. Rushford, Esquire Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 1400 & 1500 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Rushford: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 8, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning Re: September 8, 1998 agenda items Date: September 4, 1998 2) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONiNG' S REPORT Enclosed are the Findings of Fact and Decision for the following site plan applications: a) Site plan application of Rocheleau Land Development LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 26,099 square foot building for multiple industrial uses (12,000 square feet for warehouse & wholesale, 5433 square feet for warehouse and 8666 square feet for light manufacturing). The amendment consists of: 1) adding seven (7) parking spaces, 2) landscaping modifications, and 3) site modifications, 16 Gregory Drive. APPROVED b) Site plan application of Paul Mergens to amend a previously approved plan for a 21,000 square foot warehouse and/or light manufacturing building. The amendment consists of relocating two (2) parking spaces and the dumpster, 1 Green Tree Drive. APPROVED c) Site plan application of Joe Eddy Holding LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 14,000 square foot building for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses for a multiple of number of tenants. The amendment consists of making landscaping and site modifications, 41 Commerce Avenue. APPROVED 3) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN & REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of modifying the configuration of two (2) parcels that were originally approved by the Planning Commission on 1/23/73. The boundary line adjustment involves moving the southerly boundary of lot A 70 feet to the south to include a 70 foot r.o.w. to the Horticultural Farm which was eliminated when Green Mountain Drive was constructed. Preliminary Memo - Planning September 8, 1998 agenda items September 4, 1998 Page 2 This property located at 1400 & 1500 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District. It is bounded on the east by Green Mountain Drive, on the south by an auto dealership, on the west by Shelburne Road, and on the north by a retaiUoffice building and undeveloped land. Lot size/frontage: The expanded lot meets lot size and frontage requirements. Coverage/setbacks: Coverage and setback requirements are met. 4) ALLSON PARTNERSHIP & BPD REALTY INC. - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN & REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of modifying the configuration of several lots, in particular lots # 11 and 12, that were originally in an 18 lot subdivision approved by the Planning Commission on 1/23/73. This proposal involves moving the southerly boundary of lot #11 35 feet to the south to the centerline of a 70 foot r.o.w. to the Horticultural Farm which was eliminated when Green Mortmain Drive was constructed. This proposal also involves moving the northerly boundary of lot #12 35 feet to the north to center of this same 70 foot now. Lot size/frontage: The expanded lots will meet the lot size and frontage requirements. Coverage/setbacks: Coverage and setback requirements are met. Other: The plan should be revised to include a note that the "old" property lines will be dissolved. 5) WOLFSTEIN ARCHITECTURE - DWELLING TO OFFICE - SITE PLAN This project consists of converting a 1092 square foot single family dwelling to general office use on a lot which contains a second principal building (telecommunications hut). The last review of this property was on 4/14/98 (minutes enclosed). 2 ALBA3VS r n i t ur ibcxes etc Worth rh,± •9 Lincoln A 'ARKSBORO Sat & Sur.. 9-5pm .Dtotiiler, freezerlawn garden, clothes, aencid, aria more. -4011ow Rd. 434-5469. WILLISTON amtly garage sa,e. 3-.n 3-2. Beanie Sa- oaseball cards. `i r- ,cuseno'c to rs. .., ctS mcre. ,G 4r `.ereil Rd. Burlington K of ,-lir -- - d iours cultura nooski Ave., VT 05401 by 3. Members land diverse ps are Muir ualwcations 1 •,t#ncourag&d to apply. strong CHILDCARE Full time or ird cus- I °part time afternoons. I end a (toddler experience. Call ialid diver i Qansa. Pre- iO64-0079. vous 3dmis5lons or re- I fated exper ence regwred. 9, ILD CARE New day Please send esume and i rare. Director & all posi- three 'orofes;,cna; .efpr- ticrs available. Send re ences by august 3'. '998. -, 'ne to: PO Box 1552, re Williston, VT 05495. Human Resource3 DISHROOM WORKER Trinity College F,n! rime. 3:15-3:15 Mon - of Vermont = _;NE SERVER, part 208 Ccichester Ave ti ne 10-2:30 Mon -Fri. Surlin tur LT Ofi fn1 9 AAi c'OE i 3h sue at 656-2569, ®I DRIVERS BUSHEY BROS. PAV- Must have CDL Class B ING & CONTRACTING f license. -LISTON Neighbor- g :� yard gales. I-r3borers & Poe Layers Incl. benefits. pi- as, apply to Baker s ,t = 3-3 Turtle Cros 'rom T3fts Corners. xeerience in ewer € r „_ - F tir t `� Di rnbuting, 111 Hercules I Dr Ichesrer is on Fite. 2. left on _t' _ _ Stage. follow signs. .LISTON Neighbor-' PERSONALS 6 ;d saie. Many mist PERSONALS 6 -mufti-family. 9-4 i ADOPT A 9 -a. Terry Lane babv. a dre:arn: ; SINGLES CONNECTION LISTON Sat 9-3, y1/e q give g your baby a FT MOM. Single Adults Network v. Williston Rd. Multi ; 3vcr,d DAD I beautiful some, stable 'rcfessional & Intelligent Newsletter 800-775-3090 a,ly. Womens & mens values, great education, hes. mens shirts sz. much love! Expenses ST. JUDE medical medical equip., paid. Marie &John. has answered my pray - itmes. 1-888-824-3604. ers. have faith and he will LISTON Sun. 9-4pm. A D O P.T I O N Bright answer yours. Amen. isehold, truck tires. , cheerful nursery is ready TICKETS FOR SALE leasant Acres Drive, for the baby we are ea- ALL NASCAR RACES Mountain View Rd. 878-6893. ger to adopt. Kindly call Pam & Susan: 1-800-528-4257 STAGEFRONT TICKETS ,ISTON Yard sale- 1-800-982-3678. TICKETS Great seats! ;e assortment of 'ems. Sat -Sun 8-4. ADOPTION A oeautiful The original Riverdance. 2 )4 West Oakhill Rd. life awaits your baby in our warm country home fix, $55 each. Aug. 29 at 3pm. Montreal Molson DOSK1 57 Lafountain by the seashore. Loving, Ctr. Call Brad, 656-0094 Moving Sale. House- happily married, educe- (days), 863-5182 (eves.) goods, antiques, <S eta ted and financially secure couple promises lots of ADULT 8 r Sat &Sun gam. o laughter and brigght future for ENTERTAINMENT �OSKI CC's, mov- furniture, sports your baby, Ex- penses paid. Call Denise EXOTIC DANCERS s, lots of stuff. Fri & collect at 603-228-1614 Gorgeous Girls/Guys 7:30-3:30. Rain or from 8:30AM-5:00PM. N.E. Entertainment Unitd. a. 364 North St. Convert clutter to cash with * 800-545-7122 a Free Press Classified ad, Call 658.3321. _ ADOPTION Caring, Sup- " portive home with love. fun & happiness is waiting to welcome your baby. r f Good things can happen www•fantasyenterpriso.com for us all. Anat &Chris MEN:SAFE HOT LOVE!! 1-800-920-5921. Use seduction! SASE to: ADOPT young white tour Free Details,PO Box 5456 pie, with lots of love, Essex Jct,Vt 05453-5456. prays for newborn to share lifetime of happi- HARDBODIES ness in warm & secure home, expenses #1 exotic dance co. paid. Please call Ellen/Jim Quality dancers for all events.1-800-370-2223 800-944-2485. NAWAII 2 round trip air- faires, leave any major l airport, $199 each. Cali faiERTAInmEnT 1-800-659-1787. I PlAYMRTE BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND 50 Easy Southern Recipes, origi- 80R-865-�069 nal 1986 version, $7.95, kANET ROCK M. Cummings, 8113 Gorgecus dancers, Mon - Moores Lane, # 1900- Sat.. Barre. Plus, Planet 129, Brentwood, TN Rock's Adult Novelty 37027. Store, Mon -Sat, 12pm- LYNYRD SKYNYRD closing. 802-479-0234 TICKET SOLID GOLD DANCERS box seat Sept, 4th, in- Birthdays, Strip-O- cludes fair admission. Grams. Bachelor (ette). $33. Call 802-654-7230. One-on-one 862-1377 -800-754-3077. u OLD JAY PEAK PHo- INSTRUCTION q TOS AND STORIES sensitive white Collecting memorabilia knows adoption and anecdotes from an easy choice. "fly history Jay Mtn, ski Provide newborn School and Walter wing & secure fu- Foeger. Will copy and re- y�ur �9 srn me Sodtl et�Tart rC rK ct pq -'1VT TRUCK DRIVER e. Leg -al& - � P�ak��s orl= t K' :.s<,s..`++�+,i s� a^a Law�,..� ► - �` SCHOOL _ Mill benefit program and data base. 'Nord Part time positions avail ;easing, spread sheet Please reply: LOT Man- late er' xiils : e- agement, PO Box 218, Greenvale, NY 11548 or 'u,ne . li O Box vste Sr Medical fax reply 516-626-9159. 366, Williston, VT 05495. Merchandise Thrifty No phone calls please. P1 , ads: quirk, easy, and they work great! Call MAKER/GE- ' NERAL HELP/DELIV- 65&3321. ERY DRIVERS FT/PT. Apply in person at Essex LANDSCAPE LABOR- Ctr'ocation. ERS Needed for lawn maintenance and snow PRE-SCHOOL DIREC- i removal. Valid driver's If- TOR Qualified candi- cense required. 863-8097. I dates must have experi- LANDSCAPE LABORER' ence and be highly motivated to expand our Artistic Landscaping has i program. Please submit immediate opening for resume to Racquet's hardworking individual Edge, 4 Morse Or, Essex w/ driver's license, mow- Jct., VT 05452, Attn: Jan. ing exer.preferred. Cal 1879 9535. RECEPTIONIST/SALON COORDINATOR in busy PAINTERS * * $7-$11 per hair; salon. FT/PT posi- tions. Send resumes to: hour. Established local Imm�e— oar aC1 Indigo, 189 Battery St., Chittenden Ce !al Supervisory U ion NOTICE OF ADO TI N OF SCHOOL B AR POLICIE The suprvisor u ion school board ill eet on Monday, A gust 4, 1998 at its ten rat off e at 6:00 p.m. t formally adopt a large umber of new and revi d policies and procedu es it the following bra d areas: E. Support S rvices G. Personnel I. Instruction J. Students K. School Community Relations Copies of policies slated for approval re available for review at he Chitten- den Central upervisory offices locate at 7 Meadow Te ace in Essex Junctio i. Call 379-5579 for r ore nformation. >ugust 22, 1944 INVITATION O BID 'he St. All ns City ichool Distric is pres- intly acceptin bids for tie purchase installa- on of IBM c mpatible omputers for c ssroom se on a Wind ws95 & lovell network. ids are ue at Franklin entral upervisory Unio office y September 2, 1 98 at :30 p.m. For furt r in- >rmation contact: avid Crawford. Bus ess tanager, FCSU, 28 athenne St., St. Alba s, T 05478. 80JBID 260 ugust 21, 2, 199 INVITATIOIDanklin Ceuper- >ory Unioneptingoposals untilaptember 8 at:00 a.m. foindingmg Term Dysurance tosrct full- 1e employees. For in- mation regarding this The Waterfront Com- f, please contact David mittee of the City Crawford, Business Mitt a anager, Franklin Cen- G8 will hold I S. U. 28 Catherine Publip hearing on St. Albans, VT Monday, August 24 at 478.524-4321 7:00 p.m. at Contois Auditorium, City Hall to he" commgpt on a Proposed modifica- tion tb'the Cfty's UrbanI Renewal 'Plan Lqr r$X)1.all��tj°� , of August 21, 22 & 23, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 8, 1998, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of BAP Realty Associ- ates to modify the con- figuration of two (2) par- cels that were originally approved by the South Burlington Planningg Commission on 1/23/73, 1450 and 1500 Shelburne Road. 2) Final plat application of Alison Partnership and BPD Realty, Inc., to mod- ify the configuration of several lots, in particular lots 11 and 12-that were originally created in an 18 lot subdivision ap- proved by the South Bur- lingtop PlanninCom- mission on 1/29/73, 40 and 5p Green Mountain Drive. Copies of the applica- tions are available for Public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission August 22, 1998 P LIC HEARING COUNCIL ATERFRONT CO ITTEE REVISED WA ONT URBAN✓ Restaurant EXECUTIVE CHEF Hands-on position at his- toric Vermont village ;nn and restaurant, one mile from Dartmouth College. Busy 70 seat restaurant serving breakfast, lunch. dinner and Sunday brunch. Brewery on premise with 30 seat pub. Must be innovative, have culinary degree, abilittyy to manage a staff Of 10, solid work history. Attractive salary and benefits. Call Sally, 802-649-1143. CLASS IF L,CENS NURSa ASSISTA' 3reen Mountain -+ome is starting on September - while you fear, 'raining. Apply a Mountain Nursing 1102 Ethan Ali, Fort Ethan Allen, Colchester VOCATIONAL MANAGER: Nee Master's level Counselor to Svcs. for work-inlr ents. CRC or CDC tifications requirec ble hours. Some travel. Camper according to expo Resume to P.O. B Burlington, VT EOE. LEGAL 11 EMPLOYMENT NOTICES ACCOUNT EXECI the Community &I The sales team of Economic Develop- Fox 44, Burlir merit Office, Room Plattsburgh, Montr 2, City Hall. seeking a creative sonable & energeti . rbara Perry didate for the posit C air Account Executive C y Council Burlington area W terfront No previous tele C mittee sales experience Au ust 22, 1998 quired-however m= ing background ferred. WFFF offers benefit pkg. & - Please send resur cover letter to: S Bogardus, Sales ager WFFF-TV IF y M �O m en f Roosevelt Highway chester, VT 05446. E 17 YR. OLD SMOKER for tab cc ,purchase re search 2 days, $20( Call 1- `0-44550-5343. TOiESPONE TO A F EE PRESS BO NUMBER Send t : Burli ton Free Press .O. Box 10 Burli gton, VT 05402 Att: ree Press Box SELOIDLE ITEMS" WITH A CLASSIFIED AD, CALL 6584321. lcco ' nting �R CLERK Pa Data Payroll Services, In ., is seeking a detail- 0 ented individual for its Clerk position. Candi- ate should possess strong communication skills, as well as working knowledge of word pro- cessing and spreadsheet applications. Duties will include posting/proofing cash receipts, collection activity and extensive bank reconciliation. If in- terested, please respond by resume only to: Victo- ria Nadeau-Trahan, Fi- nance Manager or email- vnadeautrahan@payda- ta.com. payda- ta.com. o.., m—, tar...-..,t, ,,, •. aeveiopmentally :isaC 9(� ndividuals in 'heir _,a- core- B.A. and ence with this popuiaec*- 1 required. Excellent bene- fits. Please respond 'o Gregg Mousley, Commu- nity Associates, 61 Court Street, Middlebury. /T 05753. EDE M- r-,)� ��, /,7 71,75 MOTION OF APPROVAL BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of BDP Realty Associates to modify the configuration of two (2) parcels that were originally approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/75, 1400 and 1500 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plat entitled, "Boundary Survey BDP Realty Associates Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated July 30, 1998, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any change to the final plat shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 3. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the City Planner. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 August 19, 1998 Robert H. Rushford, Esquire Gravel & Shea P.O. Box 369 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Boundary Adjustment, 1450 & 1500 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Rushford: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, August 28, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. � Sincer , Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. NOTE: To be submitted under separate cover Draft Traffic Impact Study: IDX Expansion South Burlington, Vermont Preparedfor. IDX Systems Corporation 17 November 1998 White River Junction, Vermont SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale --- Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). --/ Existing vegetation and natural features. --- Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. cv - Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. ✓ Zoning boundaries --- Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). --- Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. --- Location of septic tanks (if applicable). --- Location of any easements. --- Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --- North arrow --- Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. --- Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). --- Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). --- Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). --- Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. --- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone --- Bike racks Traffic generation Traffic Impact fees PUD/PCD standards Airport Approach cone Outside storage/display F. A.R. Lot merger agreement Setback from planned r.o.w. If boundary line adjustment, need subdivision? Nonresidential use setback from Residential District. Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. I E 'ISTING BUILDING PAAIM CORPORATE PROPOSED SIGN STATEMENT GREEN MT. DRIVE "441 ,TrFfl PARKING DECKS SERVICE ` WITI- Wl VISION CENTER PROPOSED BUILDING FOUNTAMIS PIE C E I V E D NOV 0 6 14c + rll City of So. Bur(ipAto n .• =_ i Y � �Y r� �r - 54 p 0 As 0, j z� _ 80 Z W La SERVICE L Q J -Air 41 off t l!1 a Al : ( Ius1 t AS1 14FW 77 TT TT VW I ' : y ... _ is I P O N D r S H E L B U R N E ROAD PROJECT INFORMATION Lu V) LU EXISTING BUILDING > iST FLOOR. 42,132 SF OFFICE Q 2ND FLOOR 41.234 SF OFFICE < 3R0 FLOOR 40,842 SF OFFICE TOTAL 124.208 F OFFI V-) J PROPOSED BUILDING GROUND FLOOR 16,030 SF OFFICE 29,140 SF STORAGE I ST FLOOR 45,170 SF OFFICE 2ND FLOOR 45,170 SF OFFICE _ e 3RD FLOOR 45,170 SF OFFICE iy 4TH FLOOR 29,140 SF OFFICE 5TH FLOOR 29.140 SF OFFICE 0) TO AL 209.802 SF OFFICE e " Q TOTAL 29,140 SF STORAGE F o PROPOSED LINK m I IT FLOOR 9,951 SF ASSEMBLY (TRAINING ROOMS) � 2NO FLOOR 9,951 SF ASSEMBLY (CAFETERIA) > DIAL 19,902 SF ASSEMBLY PARKING COUNT PROPOSED REOUIRED H.C. ON GRADE 24 ON GRADE 955 334.010 S.F. OFFICE o ON PARKING DECK 417 ♦ 250 S.F./SPACE TOTAL 1.396 1.336 RED SPACES z o' SITE COVERAGE ALLOWABLE m BUILDINGS 96,931 SF '13.5X1c66.2X 70X PAVEMENT �0 377.788 SF 52.7X TOTAL 716.567 SF 100.0% ,J / .<. t2H!'fttSiftl.Ti ... -.. _- i�ll�^._•..'MrsIr �_ ��.^ --1 1 \ �. -. 11 � /' ♦ � \ � . ,q `fie®�,. / ♦Fly` �i� }� r" a�, �� .;� f ,l`: `1 ii�0' 1. -`. �r,�',`. �.." .�,... `�� 7..��►,b , _ � {` r .� '11i. '.,fit: ` .� � (, M1♦ ��:-�`••-_ r Olf lll�' 1127 a _ J PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, September 8, 1998, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of BDP Realty Associates to modify the configuration of two (2) parcels that were originally approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/73, 1450 and 1500 Shelburne Road. 2) Final plat application of Allson Partnership and BPD Realty, Inc., to modify the configuration of several lots, in particular lots 11 and 12, that were originally created in an 18 lot subdivision approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission on 1/23/73, 40 and 50 Green Mountain Drive. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission August 22, 1998 MEMORANDUM To Applicants/Project ills From: Raymond J. Belair, oning & Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, September 8 , 1998 agenda items Date: August 19, 1998 MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY - CONTRACTOR'S YARD - SITE PLAN — indicate distance of easterly property boundary. indicate size of lot. — staff recommends that the two (2) Norway Maples be planted in the front along the street. — provide the square footage of office space, the number of non -office employees and the number of company vehicles operating from the premises (for parking calculation). — provide at least one (1) handicapped space. — the plan should include a north arrow. — the plan should be dated. — provide exterior lighting details (cut -sheets) and show locations on the plan. — if a dumpster will be used, it should be shown on the plan and properly screened. — the Planning Commission will decide whether the applicant will be required to construct a sidewalk along the property's frontage. — a bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. — the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $1000. — staff calculates front yard coverage to be 36.5% and application indicates that it is 30%. This should be checked again to be sure it does not exceed 30%. The front yard is 57 feet wide. BPD REALTY ASSOCIATES - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN & REVISED FINAL PLAT — plat submitted is acceptable. ALLSON PARTNERSHIP & BPD REALTY INC. - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN & REVISED FINAL PLAT five (5) full sized copies of the plat should be submitted. the plat should be revised to show the two (2) lots approved on 10/12/76. the property line separating lots #3 and 5 should be noted as "to be dissolved." the $5.00 application fee shortfall must be submitted. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: September 8, 1998 Agenda Items Date: August 14, 1998 MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY - WILLISTON ROAD 1. Sewer service to the site is in the rear not in front as plans show. 2. There are several large healthy trees on the site which may be saved. None of these trees are shown on the plan. 3. There exists an fire hydrant on the site frontage. It should be shown. VINCOM LLC (ZACHARY) - PARKING LOT - WILLISTON ROAD There is an existing 8 inch sewer main running along the east side of the O'Brien property which should be shown on the plan. BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - BOUNDARY SURVEY - GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE - SHELBURNE ROAD Boundary adjustment lot plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers dated July 30, 1998 is acceptable. 1 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: September 8, 1998 agenda items Date: August 19, 1998 1) BDP Realty Associates 1400 & 1500 Shelburne Road Acceptable 2) Allson Partnership & BDP Realty Associates 1600 Shelburne Road Acceptable 3) WOLFSTEIN ARCHITECTURE 8-10 White Street Acceptable 4) David Taber, Jr. 30 Airport Road Acceptable Dated 8/6/98 Dated 8/6/98 Dated 5/21/98 Dated 8/10/98 5) United Methodist Church Dated 8/10/98 899 Dorset Street The applicant should check with the State Department of Labor & Industry on places of assembly. 6) Middlebury Fence Company Dated 8/5/98 4001 Williston Road Will building have sprinklers CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) a. Owner of record BDP Realty Associates b. Applicant BDP Realty Associates C. Contact Robert H. Rushford. Esq. at Gravel and Shea P.O. Box 369, Burlington. VT 05402-0369 Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s): Please see attached. Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc.): Please see attached. Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties: Allson Partnership: City of South Burlington Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.: See attached Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, street, storm drainage, etc.: N/A Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and I include the dates of such actions: See attached. 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8'/2 x 11, 8'/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of. i) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and ii) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structure, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, flood plains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a sit plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (Si tur pplica r contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant: BDP Realty Associates 2) Name of Subdivision: National Life Subdivision 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney of plat designer since preliminary plat application: 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (I I x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a m or subdivision. nature) applicant or contact person Date <BDP Realty As—tatu Sketch Plan/56372/17hw1111.WP/RHR> GRAVEL AND SHEA CHARLES T SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW AREA CODE 802 STEPHEN R. CRAMPmN 76 ST. PAUL STREET TELEPHONE 658-0220 STEWART H. MCCONAUGHY FAX 658 1456 ROBERT B. HEMLEY POST OFFICE BOX 369 WILLIAM G. POST, JR. CRAIG WEATHERLY BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 CLARKE A. GRAvEL JAMES E. KNAPP COUNSEL JOHN R. PONSETTO NORMAN WILLIAMS DENNIS R. PEARSON PETER S. ERLY SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT F O'NEB.L MARGARET L. MONTGOMERY Lucy T. BROWN MAGOWAN STEPHEN P. July 31, 1998 ERIK B. FnzPATRICK LEIGH POLK COLE ROBERT H. RUSHFORD Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: Pursuant to our phone conversation on July 30, 1998, I am enclosing the following on behalf of BDP Realty Associates: Sketch Plan and Final Plat Subdivision Amendment Applications for the existing configuration of BDP's lots on Shelburne Road. 2. Project Narrative (describing the history and modifications to BDP's lots). 3. Boundary Survey dated July 30, 1998 depicting the existing configuration of BDP's lots). 4. Our check in the amount of $80.00 for the advance payment of the Final Plat application (e.g., we understand that no fee is charged for sketch plan). Please let me know if you need any additional information to process this application. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Rob`-rt- H. Rushford RHR:ecp Enclosures cc: Mr. Ronald Roberts (w/enclosures) GRAVEL AND SHEA CHARLES T. SHEA ATTORNEYS AT LAW AREA CODE 802 STEPHEN R. CRAMYION 76 ST. PAUL STREET TELEPHONE 658-0220 STEWART H. MCCONAUGHT FAX 658-1456 ROBERT B. HEMLEY POST OFFICE BOX 369 WILLIAM G. POST, JR. CRAIG WEATHERLY BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0369 CLARKE A. GRAVEL JAMES E. KNAPP COUNSEL JOHN R. PONSETTo DENNIS R. PEARSON NORMAN WILLIAMS PETER S. ERLY SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT F. O'NEE.L MARGARET L. MONTGOMERr WRITER'S E-MAIL: LUCY T BROWN STEPHEN P. MAGOWAN Auizust 7. 1998 RRUSHFORD@GRAVSHEA.COM ERIK B. FITZPATRICK LEIGH POLK COLE ROBERT H. RUSHPORD Mr. Ray Belair, Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: BDP Realty Associates Dear Ray: Enclosed please find the following supplemental materials in connection with the sketch plan/final plat application that was filed earlier this week by BDP Realty Associates: 1. Four copies of the full size 1998 Boundary Survey for the Property. 2. One reduced copy of the 1998 Boundary Survey for the Property. 3. Our check in the amount of $5.00 (e.g., as additional payment for the amount previously submitted). I understand that this matter will be heard by the Planning Commission at its September 8, 1998 meeting. Please let me know if the Commission will need any further information before the meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, GRAVEL AND SHEA Robert- H. Rushford RHR: ecp Enclosures cc: Mr. Ronald Roberts (w/o enclosures) David W.M. Conard, Esq. (w/o enclosures) City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 15, 1998 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Site Modifications, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the December 16, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the Findings of Fact & Decision on the above referenced project approved on December 16, 1997 (effective 1/13/98). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. City Planner JW/mcp Encls 1-14-1999 9:26AM FROM <ESSEL GUFF CORP 802 679 2967 P_ 1 Tat City of South Burlington Planning Department ATTN: Ray Belaire Fnmm John C.aulo M. Ron Roberts, Dale Rorlieleau, and Debra Bell Daft: 01114/99 Re! IDX Expansion: Revised Sewer Allocation Request I enclose a revised request for sevmr atlocattion cone arning the Proposed expansion project at the IDX campus along Shelburne Road. The rued request includes 0* total ernployee population 'dasse at IDX (e)isting and proposed), less the 20% credit for municipal system and low4ow fi>Qurers, and less e>astng allocation The estimated allocation continues to be based on Vermont AGency of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Rules Chapter-1(aW6), and is calculated as follows. 1. Office. 1,77 5 employees (eksting and proposed) x 15gpd/employee = 25,625 galJperiday 2. Cafeteria: 300 seats x 50gpolseat = j,QI./�erldav 3. Sub Total: 41,625 gat/per/day 4. Less 20 %: 0 0% low flow fixtures; 1011/omunicipal system) - 6,325 gat./per/day 5 Less Existino Allocation: -'L500 galJper/dam 6, TQTAL 25,800 gal./per/day Thank you for your continued assistance in processing this application, If additional information is required, please advise. 57 Talwtt: Road Wtliston, Vermont 05496 ph (802)579-2965 fax �.802)-$7G�-2967 a portion of the applicant's property located at the rear of the adjacent Mobil station is being used by that service station for vehicle storage. If this use is to continue, the application should be amended to include this use. the site plan should be revised to accurately show the "as -built" conditions of the concrete pads on the east and west sides of the building and the sidewalk along the driveway to Williston Road. 6) BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES -OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION- PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of : 1) razing a 21,200 square foot general office building, 2) constructing a 239,708 square foot addition and a 20,476 square foot connector to an existing 124,208 square foot general office building, 3) constructing a 646 space 3-level parking structure, and 4) merging three (3) lots into one (1) lot. The 124,208 square feet building was approved on 12/15/87. Several minor site modifications have been made since 1987. This application will be treated as a planned unit development. The sketch plan was reviewed on 11/10/98 (minutes not available). This property located at 1400 Shelburne Road lies within the C2 District, and the Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlay District. It is bounded on the north by IDX Drive, on the west by Shelburne Road, on the east by Green Mountain Drive, and on the south by an auto dealership. Access/circulation: Access is currently provided by a 32 foot and 45 foot curb cut on IDX Drive and a 24 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road. The applicant proposes to: 1) eliminate the Shelburne Road curb cut, 2) extend IDX Drive to connect with Green Mountain Drive, and 3) construct a new 24 foot curb cut on Green Mountain Drive. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 22.5% (maximum allowed is 30% and includes parking garage). Overall coverage is 64.8% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage along Shelburne Road is 0%, along IDX Drive is 34.4%, and along Green Mountain Drive is 35.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Front yard coverages along IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive are proposed to be exceeded. The Planning Commission may allow these coverages to be exceeded under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. The existing building and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. The proposed parking structure does not meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement from Green Mountain Drive. The proposed setback is 12 feet. The applicant is seeking a waiver from the front setback requirement as provided under Section 12.406(b) of the zoning regulations. Staff does not see a problem with granting this waiver. 3 Parking: A total of 1538 spaces are required and 1394 spaces are provided including 26 handicapped spaces. This represents a 144 space or 9.4% shortfall. It is the applicant's position that the 29,888 square feet used for storage and the 20,476 square feet of building connector space should not be used for parking calculation. If these square footages are not included in the calculation, a total of 1337 spaces are required or 57 spaces more than required. A bike rack is provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Staff does not agree that storage space should be subtracted when calculating required parking spaces since storage is an important component of the City's office parking standard. Staff does not see a problem with subtracting out the 20,476 square feet of building connector/cafeteria space. With this area subtracted out, the required parking is 1456 spaces which represents a 62 space, or 4.3%, waiver. Staff does not see a problem with approving this number of spaces since the Commission has routinely granted up to an 8% parking waiver for multiple story office buildings. The parking count information on the cover sheet should be revised to correct the square footage of office space and the number of spaces required. Parking is based on gross square footage/250 (384,329 square feet/250 = 1538 spaces). Parking structure: The proposed parking structure does not appear to meet the "Design Guidelines for Parking Structures" in the following manner: — the maximum distance between parking spaces and nearest exit stairwell is greater than 200 feet (i.e., 240 feet). — there should be two (2) elevators for up to 500 parking spaces and no elevators proposed. — lighting information within the structure has not been provided. Staff is unable to determine whether adequate lighting is proposed to meet the guideline. Landscapin . The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $257,950 which is being met. Proposed plantings include: Red Maple, Green Ash, Crabapple, Honeylocust, Sugar Maple, Birch, Pin Oak, Shadblow, Spruce, Pine, Viburnum, Juniper, and Wintercreeper. Landscaping plan should be revised to provide street trees on the east side of the extended portion of Green Mountain Drive. Staff recommends that parking be shifted back to create a green strip between the circulation aisle and parking and the proposed r.o.w. (at the northwest corner of the site) and that this green strip be adequately landscaped, Bartlett Brook Watershed Protection Overlgy District (BBW): This property is located in the BBW District. Under Section 23.20 of the zoning regulations, the applicant shall submit applicable information regarding the development and storm water management design to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the City's stormwater hydrology computer model. The final plat plans should incorporate the recommendations from Heindel and Noyes. 4 Building height: Section 25.113(a) of the zoning regulations limits the height of a flat roof structure to 35 feet. The proposed addition will have a height of 68 feet from the average pre -construction grade. This is 33 feet greater than permitted. Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve a non-residential structure with a height in excess of the limitations provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. The applicant should be prepared to address these criteria. Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires additional front, side and rear setbacks for taller structures. The proposed addition will meet the additional setback requirements. Information on the height of the parking structure measured to top of the light fixtures on the upper level should be provided. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation requested is unknown. This information should be available at the meeting. The applicant will be required to pay the per gallon fee prior to permit issuance. There is currently no reserve capacity currently available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Approved allocation will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. The Commission's policy has been that a permit can not be issued until allocation is available. Allocation is projected to be available at the end of July, 1999. This issue will need to be discussed with the Commission because the applicant would like to start construction in the spring. Staff does not see a problem with amending the policy as long as the new space is not occupied until the new plant expansion is on line. Traffic: The applicant submitted a traffic impact study (see enclosed) addressing the impact of the proposed addition. This report has been submitted to the MPO for their review and comment. The study concludes as follows: 1) Overall levels of service during the AM and PM peak hour north of IDX are acceptable with the IDX expansion in 2005. 2) IDX Drive/US 7 operates poorly during the no -build and build scenarios by 2000. 3) South of IDX Drive, certain intersections begin to show poor levels of service by 2005, including the Bartlett Bay Road approach to US 7, the US 7/Allen Road and US 7 Pine Haven Road intersections, and the Bay Road approach to US 7. 5 To mitigate the above impacts, the study recommends the following: 1) With the expansion of IDX to over 300 employees, a left -turn lane should be constructed on southbound US 7 at IDX Drive, and a right turn signal should be added to the westbound approach to service IDX Drive. 2) Intersections south of IDX Drive will significantly improve levels of congestion with the construction of the VAOT Shelburne Road improvements. At this time, they do not recommend any additional mitigation for those affected intersections beyond what will be constructed by VAOT. 3) IDX should continue their transportation demand management program that includes flex- time and support of alternative transportation modes. If is does not already, the program could include a clearinghouse for van pool/car pool information for employees. The company can also provide secure bicycle facilities and showers for those wishing to walk or bike to work. 4) Traffic signal offsets and timings should be maintained in the corridor to improve coordination between signals. Staff recommends that the applicant conduct a signal timing/coordination analysis for the corridor. Also, a queue length analysis should be conducted, in particular, the southbound left -turn queque at IDX Drive. Section 12.403(a) of the zoning regulations requires an overall intersection LOS of "D" or better. In addition, the individual LOS for thru movements on the major roadway shall be "D" or better. There are several intersections and thru movements that will not meet the standards of this section. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $110,000. Dumpsters: The dumpsters will be located inside the building. Lighting Proposed exterior lighting consists of the following: — twelve (12) 100 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 43" bollards. — nine (9) 27 watt flourescent lamps mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. — thirteen (13) 100 watt halogen stake -mounted uplights. — three (3) 100 watt halogen surface -mounted uplights. — forty-four (44) 175 watt metal halide lamps mounted on 20 foot poles with downcasting shielded fixtures. — eleven (11) fountain lights. 6 Existing exterior lights consist of the following: nine (9) 250 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures. Lot merger: A lot merger agreement, approved by the City Attorney, should be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans which merges lots A, B and the recently acquired lot # l l from Allson Partnership. Other: — the two (2) survey plats should be combined into one (1) plat showing the entire property. The property lines to be dissolve should be noted as such. A lot merger agreement will not be needed if this is done. — the site plan should show the zoning boundaries. — applicant should research whether the legal documents are in place to extend IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive and make the connection. the landscape plan does not accurately show the r.o.w. taking at the northwest corner of the site. 7) GARY FARRELL - HOTEL ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a 130 room hotel with a 135 seat standard restaurant. The amendment consists of constructing a 29 room, 2-story addition (19,800 square feet) for a total of 159 rooms. The last review by the Planning Commission was on 3/11/97 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1 117 Williston Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the west by a retail building and 100 Dorset Street, on the north by Williston Road, on the east by a service station and five (5) residences, and on the south by a retail building. Access/circulatiom Access is provided by: 1) a 30 foot ingress only curb cut on Williston Road, 2) a 49 foot signalized ingress and egress curb cut on Williston Road, 3) a 30 foot mutual access drive to the service station to the east, and 4) a 24 foot access drive to the adjoining property to the south. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 21.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 60.1% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 32.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). This is an existing situation which will not be made worse by this application. 7 � r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 14, 1999 John Caulo Kessel,Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Ile: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information andlor revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, January 18, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc e , Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB incp Memorandum - City Engineer January 26, 1998 agenda items January 8, 1999 Page 2 This should be shown and the building must not infringe upon the easement for this sewer. 3. Water for adequate fire protection especially the 10 unit wood construction building, should be checked. It may not be adequate. This should include fire flow tests in the area. IDX EXPANSION- SHELBURNE ROAD 1. The City Water Department shall receive a copy of the utility plans for review. 2. Adjustment for storm inlets and sewer manholes should be accomplished using precast concrete risers not bricks and mortar as called for on the plans. 3. Sidewalk along Green Mountain Drive should be considered. 4. Trees should not be planted on top of water and sewer mains. They should clear them by at least 5 feet. 5. Any work on Shelburne Road will require a State Highway permit. Memorandum - Fire January 26, 1999 agenda items January 14, 1999 Page 2 5) BDP Realty Associates Dated 1/6/99 1400 Shelburne Road The Fire Department is concerned about providing fire protection in the parking garage. Will the garage be sprinklered? At minimum, the Department requests that a standpipe be provided. 2 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January 26, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of BDP Realty Associates for a planned unit development consisting of a 384,400 square foot general office use facility and a 679 space parking structure, 1400 Shelburne Road. 2) Preliminary plat application of Dorset Square Associates to amend an existing planned unit development consisting of 54,480 square feet of shopping center use, 150 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of constructing a 7,000 square foot retail building along Market Street and construction of streetscape improvements along Market Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission January 9, 1999 W aor 9-Zoe ]@A of wwoo a�eM sales hied JIM0J6 11VAV nn:i 3D-Z98 olslll'M u1M Z uosiad 610'3ye1 MMM LOt'90 lA 'uol6uging any Jalsay3100 L L L 'dH 0Hy3 :oi awnsai puss Jo 6JO laupawlA�sgofoyel of Jew -a Aidde of 6u14!I AAeay awos pue ago to ewold -!P 'S H ailnbai suoilis -od -slequalaglp Ipps snld 'lied 6u!uels mal0 sea -Aoldwe id pue 13 Ile lot luawasingwia.; uopinl pue luawanlai "sw apl 'leluap 'leo!paw 5uipnIDul abe -llol1!lauaq pue fueles luallaoxe ue saallo OHVH �aaaaas'� 2 ass eeded for to old yel- -eds room with chil- �trained, 8-6087. t door, alu- D' good 1079. MORE old. . suitable MIDIFIER =_I;MICRO- fair condi- i - needs SSE - Fair oasic. Call ice 10/25. -k gray cat on belly, aide of his neon or- d tags. If opted him :at or as a :all Becky Reward. S-TWIN �t it. Call ES 'ERS Burlinggton Call 862- E (2) pan- 3 ft. wide. 43. )R 16 cu eds clean - fine. You 111. ATOR ,W. double ood, need ears), 862- BOOR num front 3ndle. 82. MIX To home. 1 yr ds. Great )m to run. Sie)IJO t ao!AJOS rwuaru,niuua neap D axiauadxe Iuawe6ouow hpaa:) jo s.loa/ snld aAl� slltls louosiad-jalul Iuallaoxa yl!M pelt'~',)-llDlap 'PaIDAIIow-jlas a9 IIIAA aloplpuD:) 'Dap ayl jf 40S IDwalw PUD siawolsnD y(,oq 44IAA 6uploja4ul saAlonul pLID 4UOW96DUDW Iipan jo slaadsD IID iDi al9!suodsai sl uothsod sly' 'Iuau4iDda4 eDuloui� ino idol oa /4iuril' anbwn D sDy 'jadodsmau /IIDp lsa6.11ol s,41Jow-19n 'ss@Jd aai j uol6ulpng ayl 1130VNVW MUD ZZ6Z-Z98 le eauaH lle0 I asuodsal e aAlaoa1 woo Ile`-o3geM IDA sleS uo L� Ilene eq IllM slueopdde paloalas o)lal6uell :IIeW-3 lsniN ao!AuaS rewolsn0 AIuO'303'L09S0 9S00-L99-(8L9):xe3 '6uillaS-sso10 pue uoll yA 'ja!ladluoW 'L1179 EO6ZL LOST & FOUND 3 LEGAL 11 NOTICES LOST CAT orange tabby, male, neutered, has white chest and paws, an- swers to Moses, last seen on Oct- 6 Can be foundanywhere between Colchester & East Fair- field. Please call 802- 827-4469. LOST PEARL COCKA- TIEL in vicinity of Rice High School, can fly far. Call Eva 863-3399. GARAGE SALES 4 COLCHESTER Moving/Garage Sale. Sat. 9-4 & Sun. 10-4. 6 New England Ave. SO. BURLINGTON 701 Dorset St., Ashbrook Apts. #4. MOVING SALE Furniture & appliances. Convert clutter to cash with a Free Press Classified ad. Call 658-3321. SO BURLINGTON MOVING SALE Furniture, etc 30 Moss Glen Lane, Butler Farms. Sat 11-2 SO. BURLINGTON Es- tate sale Nov. 22, 23, & 24 only. 10am-4pm. Fur- niture, household goods, misc- 9 Newton Ave., off Shelburne Rd., across from Orchard School. SO BURLINGTON Sat. 1- 5, & Sun. 10-4 Porch sale' Chairs, shelves, ta- ble, lamps. 411 Flynn Ave.. near Little Caesar's, SOUTH BURLINGTON 911 Dorset St., Indian Creek #35. Antique Oak furniture, m ors, win- dow treatment ooks, misc household g Quality items at great prices. From 8 am to 1 pm on Nov. 21, Sat. only. PERSONALS 6 ADOPT A loving couple wishes more than any- thing to raise our new- born with love. care & warmth Medical/legal expenses paid. Strictly confidential Please call Lu Ann & Jeff at 1-800- 710-7776 ADOPTION:M Loving couple offering a Ilfe- time of love and sell rlty, seeks to adopt your baby. Call Bob November 20, 21, 22. 1998 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Dorset Hotel Associ- ates to amend a planned unit development consis- ting of a 21,750 square foot general office build- ing, 184 unit congregate housing facility, and a 79 unit extended stay hotel, 401 Dorset Street. The amendment consists of relocating and adding a dumpster and revising the parking layout. 2) Preliminary plat appli- cation of BD Realty Associates for a planned unit development consis- ting of a 354,520 square foot general office use facility and a 620 space parking structure. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlingtor City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission November 21 1998 PUBLIC HEABWG- 1998 at 7:00 p.m., the Hinesburg Selectboard will continue its public hearing on James and Mark Burnett's application for a "Certificate of Approval for Location of A Junkyard" on Route 116 north of Hinesburg Village, currently the licensed junkyard of Victor and Bernard Giroux The hearing will be in the Life Program Room of Town Hall. Lynn E. Gardner Chairman Hinesburg Seiectboard November 21 1998 yy a JVZ1HAH ib a11.L 11 T- Sul "off llauueD to ved si ssa1d 201,1 uol5uilir aff aaa,o le!lualod lsapnl nayl of alnquluoo ureo s;) ,Aoidu -fAua ue 6uualsOl uo spuadap ssa:)ons ley' az!ufiooal pue S< IGls,lanip anleA DM -ja)Aoldwg f4!un1joddO lenbg ue s! ssatd 1013aI!O sa»nosaa uewnu 'ssoa e1eqJe9 n..cn , n 'un,finn,na ••• * THE BURLINGTON FREE PRESS ■ SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1998 ADMINISTRATIVE AS- SISTANT Fast paced environment. Benefits & good growth potential. Detail & dpmputer ori- ented. Te. player, quick learner. Cover let- ter and resu to: Amy Cote, Griffin Interna- tional, PO Box 43, Will- iston. VT 05495. Adminstrati Assistant Copley Hospital is ct r- rently seeking an indivi - ual with a minimum of years office experience i a health care or profe sional office setting t provide receptionist, cle ical and secretarial su port for the Behavior Medicine departmen Candidates must hav strong organizationa , verbal communicati and writing skills and solid background in wo d processing, transcripts and basic accounti g functions. The ideal c n- didate will have exp ri- ence in medical bil ng and working with an - aged care contr Is. Send resume to H an Resources, Copley os- pital, 528 Wash gton Hwy., Morrisvill , VT 05661. Thr �$urlittgtott rt* lass AD SERVICES CLERK Responsibilities include general clerical duties: fik ing, taxing, answering phones, pulling tearsheets and other misc office du- ties. Send resume to Bar- bara Ross, Burlington Free Press. PO Box 10, Burlington, VT 05402- 0010 EOE, ARCHITECTS/ DRAFTPERSONS needed with construction drawing experience for professional architecture firm with international pit Now online at www.freepressclassifie • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • cm fMP10VMenf EMPLOYMENT 12 Activity Assistant We are currently seeking an enthusiastic individual to join our team, 11;30am- 8pm. Responsibilities in- clude group and individual programs. Ideal candidate will possess excellent communication skills and have experience in geriat- rics. LNA certification, mu- sical and artistic talent are a plus. Interested applicants should apply in person, call, fax or send resume to: Starr Farm Nursing Cen- ter, 98 Starr Farm Rd., Burlington, VT 05401; phone: (802) 658-6717-1 fax: (802) 658-6432. Ven- cor is a drug -free envi- ronment. EOE STAR�R�FA�RM Adminstrative Assistant Copley Hospital is cur- rently seeking an individ- ual with a minimum of 3 years office experience in a health care or profes- sional office setting to provide receptionist, cler- ical and secretarial sup- port for the Behavioral Medicine department. Candidates must have strong organizational, verbal communication COUNTY -DIRECTOR/ CVOEO: Management, position in a regional organization responsible for local performance of CHITTENDEN COMMU- NITY ACTION and a mis- sion related to economic, social, and racial justice. Work requires compe- tence in delivering human services and in the areas of advocacy, community -or anizing, and public policy, along with administrative skills including planning, grant - writing; program & bud- get development, per- formance assessment, and staff supervision. Basic computer skills necessaryy Proposed salary of 6,080 plus a comprehensive benefit package. Letter of inter- est, resume, 3 refer- ences and a one page statement of human serv- ices philosophy to: CD Search, CVOEO, PO Box 1603, Burlington, VT 05402 by December 7, 1998. Members of minor- ity and diverse cultural groups are encouraged to apply. EOE DELIVERY DRIVER We have immediate openings FT CDL Class A or B drivers. A good driving,record is a +, we offer competitive wages, comprehensive benefits package that incl. med- ical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) plan. ApPPIy in person, MF, 8am-4:30pm at Coca Cola, 46 Her- cules Dr., Colchester. EOE DININGROOM STAFF Immediate openings for Waitstaff and Assistant Manager. Apply in per- son only, Cork & Board, 100 Dorset St, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN Immediate position available in growing civil & structural engineering consulting firm. AutoCad experience required. Please send your re- sume and salary require - LEGAL SECRETARY Stitzel, Page & Fletcher seeking experienced le- gal secretary for secre- tarial/receptionist posi- tion; knowledge of Windows and Wordper- fect helpful; salary com- mensurate with experi- ence; benefits; send resume to PO Box 1507, Burlington, VT 05402- 1507. OFFICE HELP Book- keeping & Counter posi- tions avail. Hours: 9-6 Mon. -Fri. Computer exper. necessary. Send resume to: Personnel Dept., Computers Plus, 338 Dorset St., So. Bur- lington, VT 05403. _ Placing a Free Press Classified ad is sssy. we'll MIP you word your ad to pot the results you went! Charps It with your VISA or Yas- tomard. PLUMBING/HEATING SERVICE TECHNICIAN Growing co seeking indi- vidual with ability to deal with public, has plumbing & gas heating exper. & basic electrical knowl- edge. Send resume to. PO Box 1476, Williston, VT 05495 or fax to: 802- 878-1680. EOE. PRESS OPERATOR Successful candidate must possess a solid working knowledge of printing and reprographic services. The Press Oper- ator will have primary re- sponsibility for. running the presses, ensuring quality, and maintaining equipment Two to five years of related experi- ence and a vocational' technical school degree. Please submit cover letter and resume by' November 30, 1998 to Norwich Uni- versity, Human Re- sources, Northfield, VT 05663. EDE PROORAMMER/ F ANALYST e Responsibilities Incl. de- Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization 100 Dorset Street, Suite 22 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 802/660-4071 Fax: 802/660-4079 email: info@ccmpo.org website: www.ccmpo.org Member Jurisdictions December 21, 1998 Bolton Burlington Ms. Michelle Russo, Manager, Administration Charlotte IDX Corporation Colchester 1400 Shelburne Road Essex Junction P.O. Box 1070 Essex Town Burlington, VT 05402-1070 Hinesburg Huntington Dear Ms. Russo: Jericho Milton I enjoyed our brief discussion last Thursday regarding travel demand Richmond management (TDM) opportunities that IDX may wish to consider as plans for St. George expansion at the South Burlington location move ahead. In simple terms, TDM Shelburne strategies are intended to reduce the number of vehicles using the road system South Burlington while providing a wide variety of mobility options to those who need to travel. Underhill Numerous examples of successful TDM programs exist across the country, many Westford of which have been spearheaded by private employers working in partnership with Williston the public sector. Winooski Vermont Agency of As I stated during our meeting, the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Transportation Organization (CCMPO) has established pursuing TDM opportunities to control the ExOf/icioMembers growth in single -occupant vehicle traffic as a regional policy. I am therefore happy Chittenden County to volunteer the assistance and expertise of the CCMPO to help you identify, Authority Transportation Authority Transportation explore, and implement an appropriate TDM strategy for IDX in conjunction with BurlinAirport your planned expansion. We may also wish to involve other Shelburne Road Regional Planning Corridor employers to ensure a successful TDM program. Commission Rail Industry it IndustryDeoart I will call you within the next week to arrange a meeting to further discuss TDM U of Transportation opportunities. In the interim, please feel free to call me at 80210-60-4071 with questions. I look forward to working with you and IDX to make your expansion as smooth as possible. Sincerely, Peter E. Plumeau Executive Director cc: Ann Dutton, CCMPO Chair William Cimonetti, So. Burlington CCMPO Rep. Joe Weith, So. Burlington Planning Director Deborah Linehan, CCTA General Manager ccmpo Communities working together to meet Chittenden County's transportation needs t City 0f .Souft Bur Sn OOAiiT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING ,802) 658-7955 December 18, 1998 John Caulo Kessel, Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. C.'aulo: ZCNING 802)558-795d Inclosed is a copy of the November 10, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Planning & Zoning .IW mcp I Encl Memo To: Joe Weith — South Burlington City Planner From: John Caulo CC: none Date: 11 /05/98 Re: IDX Expansion — Sketch Plan Review RECEIVED NOV 0CM City of So. Burlingto" On behalf of the Owner/Applicant, I enclose the following information in connection with the proposed expansion of the IDX campus along Shelburne Road: 1. Completed Sketch Plan application 2. Completed Application for Site Plan Review 3. (5) sketch plans 4. (1) 11" x 17" illustrative site plan and perspective drawing As we discussed we are prepared to discuss the sketch plan with members of the Planning Commission at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 10 . If you have any questions or require additional information, please advise. 57 Talcott Road Williston, Vermont 05495 ph (802)-879-2966 fax (802}879-2967 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record BDP REALTY ASSOCIATES - 1400 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 b . Applicant same as above c . Contact John Caulo - Kessel/Duff Corp. P.O. Box 788, Williston, VT 05495 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Demolition of existing 20,000sf building; Construction of 209,800sf office building and 20,000sf Reception/"Visioning Center' with associated sitework and on -site parking for approximately 1,396 vehicles-, including a new parking structure. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. Fee simple. 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties See atfiekthdd. 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. Various utility easements; Expanded Route 7 ROW. 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water streets, storm drainage, etc. supply, Extension of IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive; Relocation of on -site utilitiy lines to accomodate new site plan. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: Prior approval of existing site plan by Planning Commission in 1988. 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8J x 11, 81 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, !ha be submitted for subdivisions involving a corcial or 'nd strial complex, multi -family project, pl n`ne 'unit i 1ppment, or planned residential de alo ment ,`' t (Signature) applicant or contact person Date CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) BDP Realty Associates 802/860-6188 1400 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) same as above 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) John Caulo, Kessel/Duff Corp., PO Box 788, Williston, VT 05495 PH: 802/879-2966 FAX: 802/879-2967 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1400 / 1500 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Existing 124,000sf office building and 20,000 office building; on -site parking for 458 vehicles. b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Demolition of 20,000sf building; construction of multi -story building containing 209,800sf o of office space and 29,000sf of basement storage; construction of 20,000sf reception/cafeteria/ visioning center" with associated site work and on -site parking for approxima e y , 96 vehicle; c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 124,000 + 209,800 + 207000 = 353,800sf (does not include basement or parking deck) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) New office structure to be 111,11 shaped containing a 6-story wing and a 4-story wing. Vision center to be a 2-story building; parking deck to have 2 levels of elevated parking. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) n/a f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): Existing: 451 Proposed: 1649 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): n/a 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing % Proposed 13.5 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed 66.2 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ 18,000,000.00 b) Landscaping: $ 250,000.00 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Parking deck: $3,000,000.00 Extend IDX Drive and Green Mountain Drive: 200,000.00 Enlarge pond along Route 7: $35,000 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 AM - $PM 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Summer 2000 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). December 3, 1998 South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street S. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Planning Commissioners: We are writing this letter regarding the planned expansion of IDX on Shelburne Road. First, we applaud the decision of IDX, a good corporate citizen of South Burlington, to expand locally. We are supportive of the project and the economic impact this development will have on the area. However, we and the neighbors we have spoken to are concerned that the increased volume of traffic will detrimentally affect our Imperial Drive neighborhood. Specifically, if up to a thousand additional automobiles traveling south on Shelburne Road enter the IDX property via IDX Drive, it will be extremely difficult for residents of a neighborhood of 120 households to turn south on Shelburne Road from Imperial Drive. In addition, it will also be difficult for residents of our neighborhood to turn left onto Imperial Dr. from southbound Shelburne Road, due to additional traffic congestion on that part of Shelburne Road. As you know the distance between Imperial Drive And IDX Drive is very short and the backup of traffic will be quite long. While a traffic light at Imperial would be of some help and probably necessary, it as the only solution would be wholly inadequate. The queue of cars turning onto IDX Drive would still prevent traffic from Imperial Drive from turning south, and would significantly delay cars turning into Imperial Drive from southbound Shelburne Road. Because we had short notice of the Planning Commission's meeting on this project we did not have the time to canvass the entire neighborhood, however we feel quite certain that our concern would be nearly unanimous. If necessary we would be willing to submit a formal petition by the neighborhood requesting careful consideration of the traffic plan and its impact on our neighborhood. In the spirit of cooperation regarding this important project we would like to work with the City of South Burlington and IDX to find a workable plan that would meet our need and the needs of IDX. We look forward to hearing from and working with the Planning Commission and IDX on this matter and would like to be notified of any future Planning Commission meeting regarding the project. Sincerely, Sally Bor en/Joseph B.9-1 6. Arioli 8 Worth St., S. Burlington 651-9352 1 Dayle and LeeAnn Wright 10 Worth St., S. Burlington 862-8459 r City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 December 4, 1998 John Caulo Kessel/Duff Corporation P.O. Box 788 Williston, Vermont 05495 Re: Office Expansion, 1400 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Caulo: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, December 8, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. 1f you have any questions, please give me a call. t� Joe �Veith, Director of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: December 8, 1998 agenda items Date: November 25, 1998 2) 3) BDP Realty Associates 1400 Shelburne Road New building must have standpipes/sprinkler and an alarm. Timberlake Associates 801 Williston Road Dated 11/18/98 Dated 11/13/98 If heating oil tank is for propane, it must meet NFPA 58 code. Gary Farrell (Ramada Inn) 1117 Williston Road Dated 11/16/98 This plan is unacceptable until such time as the original building is sprinklered. 4) Dorset Hotel Associates Dated 11/17/98 401 Dorset Street Acceptable MATCHLINE SP2 COSTING SVN -� r-ras.32 I-17773 EJOS7NC SNN 9a. 29 I-17749 04SI NG CB —181.46 f�I7SA0 EOsnNC CB IBIS! h170.37 DOSING CB -173.7 I-170.9 EkISING CB -f764 1-171.1 SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 EOs191G Q' GAS YAW E7nSING 12.. WA MR 4AIN --- 7---- DISIM NTDRANf EOSflNG CS A Item EMS nNG SM 211.It FIDS/41G ofOOST 15 vl_ --tEOS7ING CS I-209.20 �i ^t_�/ 11/ y[705TMG SyE/11E7t NIL17.1 5 75 I " G MATCHLWE SP2 MATCHLINE SP3 77 "w iS' NOV 1 & 1998 &sot kW MRS Feet so 0 so 100 I70 200 . VEM i NOV 1 b 1998 80' EASEMENr TO SOUTH BURLINGTON EXISTING CB FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES �r=211.09 EXIST 23 , EXISTING CB EXISTING CB r=215.98 GAS LINE _ i=211.58 8" WATER EXISTING MTC WATER VALVE 3 MAIN ti C EXISTING CB EXISTING SM EXISTIN PCB �' r-216.25 GAS VALVE r-215. __ i=212.15 _ EXISTING SM `po r=211J4 FOUNDATION r,0 i=211 3 r=216.84218 �1 EMMOLINTA1N DRIVE - - _ I V S" PVC SDR 35 t6 j / I a }- --- --- ------F------------------------- --- -- ----- I - - -- -- 8" EXISTING DI \ / l " - I \ � / PVC U DERDRAIN I CO ,-------------------------------I--------_r----- --------------- --- - - - - --/ ------------- - - -- - -- -- ------------- r L 1 t t 216 1 e END OF -/ T ---------- ----- --- _ EXISTING / _ - / CURB `r3,215.83--- _--- ,; - - - - - 21 \EXI$tfNCr---' � 1 1 lye/ _�<-�� \ 1 \ F0 DATION-i=,21Di44 M - - - - W.9 496------ ---------// -� '- - ' , /- _ 20 i 1 / / PkC r=188.98 p / 1 �� f EDGE OF / -r_„ \g 194-1 �� 19 I UO' ' PA VEMEN � / - 0b' I 1 184 / EXISTING CB----- / • `',,$ 6..; 1--� '��/ r=195.D4- EXISTING CB / - 19 --- 1 / ��---'-------------------------------' 9 ' i=j90'74 r=192.83 8 / 1 8/ \ i-188.83 �' -h(30C 1 t 1 PCB EXISTING CB WER , 1 1 r=180.5 19 \ / r=190.73 XISTIN- CB 1 MINAIRE \/ N I 1cL85 _ -_____ - $F� 1 i=175.25 I i \ =182.76 � � TYPICAL i=175.00 0� t \\PAVE PARKING �' ' �j=- _�' /\ / \ \ I \_______ ____________-_- ____----------- 1_ ,' 1 i / Y ECB PCB _ _ \ �. = ' : �. a!�1� _ Re=179.98 EXISTING / EXISTING t / / --EXIS2 3 B \ RJG i-, �`1 ` 1 R, 79.00 SEWER MH r=185.4 SEWER t / % 8- '" I 1=172.5 r=179.96 i=174.4 l; I / EXISTING CB �_� '�=178.63 .r 1g21 i=177.5 new 1 174.86 i=174.15 1 I MH - _ EXISTING L`B I 1 ,,- i�183.73 r=187.71 _ - - �"� r=18 '13 11 I - ---- 1 1 e /8 3 'RELOCATED l �nl I 1 r - ------ - ------ - _ _-_t- -� ECB :all' ,1 1 1 - -- --- ----- --- ---------- HYDRANT --- - - �&85.7 EXISTING CB - - - �-"- - - - ' } 1 �' _ - �: "r Re=180.0 i�180.7 r-18s.26 Re=181. 7- • i=180.86,- EXISTING CBS \w i=176.0 ° �\ /' / \- �� - OOLING r-182.23 - 'S'i �,_/ �\\ ! `-_-_� \ I WER ; EXISTING CB ECB \\ \` ----------- - B" S CO-,� r=184.46 Re=179.94 \ �..�_ �- ----- ---�/ ' -E►cR--- - i = '' Rn=180.90 \ -- --- 5 ►a y - ' 8" SE R / i=175.7 \ \ - EXISTING CB \ p -- / r= i=180182.32 82 PSMH \ 1� EXISTING WER MH ` XISTING may' EXISTING CB .r=179.3 \ I SE _ I \ HYD ANf r=182.88 i= / \\ \ �=180.75 g EXISTING CB i=178.98 i= 173.55 0 i-178.8s Graphk Sub Fee 30 0 30 60 90 uo N C N ` • 9 r. L L • "r �p w 0 Cl �Zz WAN oL �(AW azz au Z W PRELIMINARY M � a a o 00 H � 4 cn i 0 ix ix 0 7 Q K J m = Li ■ ' N Ln SP2 t- 44.E EXISTING PROPOSED I rTY SETB? BUILDING / / BUILDING ' EXISTING C FFE=185.0 �/' FFE=180.0 r=181.92 - COOLING i TOWER �� / °° PCB 6" PVC PROPOSED / _ � --- - , R�, ;� � �� BUILDING ♦ , ,I jl - /' i �' FFE 185.0 / I i=171.35 ----- /T 7 174 \�a 178 - ' PCB j i N 1 - �-- .�� , � Imo_ �•� - - II „ �/ i-172.05 PAVED PARKING OCL •`:a �a > ',// ---- Y PCB -- S r=174.8 174 '� \\ EXISTING CB /• /) i=169.5 _ - / ESMH r=177.17 \ B 1� / ---.� 1 V / �� -1 2,10.86 i=169.0 i=168.75 \\ J� EXISTING CB 172 \3 I .10 / r=175.0 - \ �/ ! ! \ti ?rII --- --- — — \, —---- — PCB I T O'-�� 70.2 17 i= 161.28 6103 I / C / i ��0 I EXISTING 0 ! OVERHEAD I i EXISTING CB I 1 r=171.9 �- I / ' ,'----------- =}- i V I 1=168.10 PCB \ 1870.8 ��' r=� / �6 DETENTION / - - / j UTILITY POLE BASIN 1 1 I ^\ , I TYPICAL -'EXISTING IGN tom--- i • {mac,_ � a � 1 / 6i i=160.5 I // — — — — - — — — — — — — PROPOSED `1 \`� � - }\\ /__��- i=160.4 R.O.W. I 1 `. �% \ 1 `. / ESMH 7 r=161.27 B 1=154.37EXISTING C\ r=172.72 r=171.04 =169.22 i=160.62EXISTING B .94 — -- -- -- — It ' 1 - -___ ----------- --------------------- �� --- - - - --- -- ---------------\-----------__-------- - --=s- -- -------------- -------------------- -.__r<__ --------------------------------------\------------------------+�'-------------- ��- - --- ------------- 3 of . SHELBURNE ROAD ROUTE 7 o a EXISTING �'j'•, HYDRANT EXISTING CB r=163.03 W a EXISTING 6" EXISTING 12 NOV 1 U 1998 p GAS MAIN WATER MAIN 9 Own ap i Cr.PPk SUIN Ieet 30 0 30 60 90 120 N � N 4' is s• W i ti A �w • x� w U 0 wZ Z Z - W r- Q7W aZZ Z W PRELIMINARY - o L0 o 00 V t 4 � $ c O 3 W z 0 g m Iz � w 0 H ■,h V) SP3 PLANNING COMMISSION 15 DECEMBER 1987 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 15 December 1987, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present William Burgess, Acting Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, John Belter, Judith Hurd, Catherine Peacock, Ann Pugh, Also Present Jane Lafleur, City Planner; Dennis Blodgett, Terry Krinski, Brad Carter, Veronica Lambert, R. Posey, David DuBrul; Sid Poger, The Other Paper, Shelly Myers 1. Minutes of 12/8/87 Mrs. Maher moved the Minutes of 12/8/87 be approved as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously, 2. Consider motion to table Public Hearing: Final Plat ap-- lication of Hospitality Inns for construction of 90, 615 sq. ft (footprint) addition to the Sheraton, 870 Williston Road Mrs. Maher moved to table the Public Hearing of the Final Plat application of Hospitality Inns until 5 January 1988. Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Site plan application of IDX for construction of 120,000 sc�.. feet of office space in 2 phases, 1400 Shelburne Rd. Mrs. Lafleur noted that approval had been received for this site plan many months ago, but the applicant never got a building permit primarily due to Act 250 tie-ups. They must, therefore, begin again. There are not many changes from the original plan. The new plan now shows the phasing of the project and the entrance for Phase I on Holmes Rd. Extension instead of Shelburne Rd. Mr. Krinski said that Phase I construction would begin with 250 ft. of the Holmes Rd. Extension and the road will be to city specifications. There will be an access driveway at the end of that section of road. There will also be a temporary driveway connecting the back of the lot to the Holmes Road extension. Employees will be encouraged to use the Holmes Rd. access. Mrs. Lafleur noted that Phase II will have another curb cut on Holmes Rd. She said she and the City Manager feel there should be only one driveway off Holmes Rd. and would prefer it to be further east or to align directly with the access to the Blodgett property, about 50 to 100 feet east of where it is shown now. For this to happen, parking would have to be redesigned. PLANNING COMMISSION 15 DECEMBER 1987 PAGE 2 Mr. Belter said he thought cars might come in off Shelburne Rd. if the lower access on Holmes Rd. were closed. Mrs. Lafleur said Holmes Rd. Extension will be a major connector between Shelburne Rd. and Spear St. and she and Mr. Szymanski felt the more limited the accesses, the better. Ms. Peacock said she has always favored only one access. Mr. Belter said if this were a new plan, he would agree, but the applicant drew the plans the way the Commission approved then the last time, and they already have an Act 250 permit. He felt it would be too big a change to ask now. Mrs. Maher said she agreed with both Ms.,Peacock and Mr. Belter and couldn't see asking them to redesign the whole project. Mr. Burgess agreed. Mr. Krinski said there are reasons for the locations of the curb cuts. This is a large scale project, and with 400 cars entering and leaving the site, they felt it made more sense to split the traffic. When Holmes Rd. Extension is finished, it will go to Spear St., and he felt it made sense to keep the upper curb cut for traffic going in that direction. He also felt it would be wrong to ask people to enter a project of this size from the rear door. The Shelburne Rd. entrance is for their very important clients and for the image of the corporation. People who never enter the site will still look up from that access to the building and this has been planned for visual impact. The Shelburne Rd. access is not a 90 degree one and is not designed for high traffic flow. Mrs. Maher asked if Act 250 wants a deceleration lane. Mrs. Lafleur said the deceleration lane is shown. Act 250 originally wanted a left turn lane. Mr. Carter said they are in the process of negotiating with the Highway Dept. so there will be no left turn or deceleration lane on Shelburne Rd. Mr. Burgess asked how they plan to enforce the use of Holmes Rd. for employees. Ms. Myers said it will be a company directive, and she felt employees will go where there is a traffic light. The company will also provide signage. Mr. Belter asked about truck traffic. It was noted there is a loading dock, and truck traffic will use Holmes Rd. Ext. Ms. Peacock asked if the curb cut could be aligned with the Blodgett curb cut. Mr. Krinski said it would then not line up for their internal circulation. Mrs. Lafleur noted the curbe cuts will be 18 feet from lining up. Mr. Blodgett noted they have an agreement on building Holmes Rd. Ext. The second access for the back of his project is still flexible and could possibly line up with IDX's second curb cut. Mr. Burgess did not feel the applicant should be asked to go back and reconstruct their parking lots at this time. Mrs. Lafleur said the final issue is the cost -sharing on PLANNING COMMISSION 15 DECEMBER 1987 PAGE 3 Holmes Rd. She felt some security was needed that IDX will do a share of Holmes Rd. An agreement exists between IDX and Blodgett, but the Planning Commission cannot enforce that agreement. She felt there should be a stipulation to give the city security that IDX will do their share of the road. The City Manager recommended it be for the length of the property line. Mr. Blodgett noted he will incur the entire cost of the last portion of Holmes Rd., and IDX will share in the cost of the portion they need. Mr. Burgess said all the Commission must do is require the road be built and that somebody bond for it. It doesn't matter who pays for the bond. Mr. Posey asked what is the estimate for the phasing time. It was estimated that Phase I will be built in 1989 and Phase II would begin 3 to 4 years from now . Ms. Pugh moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of BDP Realty Associates for IDX for construction of a 120,000—scf. ft. office building in two phases on 10.1 acres as depicted on an eight page set of plans entitled IDS, Interpretive Data Systems, South Burlington, Vermont, Master Plan" prepared by Horton-Ptaszynski, Architects, last revised 3/2/87 with the following stipulations: 1. A $301000 landscaping bond for Phase I and $9000 for Phase II shall be posted prior to permit. 2. The applicant shall bond for the entire cost of Holmes Rd. Exttension as far as the westerly driveway for Phase I and for the entire cost of Holmes Rd. Extension as far as the easterly -most driveway for Phase II. Easements shall be obtained from the adjacent owner to construct Holmes Rd. Ex- ension. The amount of the bond for each phase shall be determined by the City Engineer. 3. Holmes Road shall be constructed to City standards (32 feet width, curb and sidewalks). Sidewalks shall be continuous across grade without breaks. 4. An offer of dedication and deed for the road in an 80 foot right-of-way shall be submitted to the City Attorney for ap- proval prior to permit. 5. The Planning Commission grants approval of 407 parking spaces and 73 designated for future parking if determined the Planning Commission or the applicant to be needed; 210 shall be constructed in Phase I. PLANNING COMMISSION 15 DECEMBER 1987 PAGE 4 6. A sidewalk shall be constructed along the Route 7 frontage. It shall be concrete and continuous across the driveway. A bond shall be posted prior to permit in an amount determined by the City Engineer. 7. A $6983 contribution toward section improvement fund shall on the 272 trip ends generated the Shelburne Road inter - be paid prior to permit based by this development. 8. A complete erosion control, storm water runoff study bv Heindel & Noyse shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to permit. The recommendations for storm water runoff and erosion control shall be followed by the ap- plicant. 9. The fire hydrant location and relocation shall be reviewed and approved by the South Burlington Fire Chief. 10. The abondoned service road and driveway shall be removed and the area top soiled and seeded. Concrete curbing shall be installed at this abandoned access. 11. The Planning Commission grants approval of 45 feet in height for the atrium. The Commission has determined that the taller structure: a. utilizes topography and relates to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; b. doesn't detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walkways; and c. allows retention of additional green space that enhances the appearance of the developed property. I 12. A sewer allocation of 7650 gpd (3825 gpd per phase) is granted by the Planning Commission. The applicant shall pay $2.50 per gal prior to permit. 13. The parking plan shall be revised so that Phase I includes access to Holmes Road Extension. 14. The proposed sewer manhole shall be within paved areas such as driveways and parking areas. 15. Storm sewer pie shall be concrete or pvc, not metal or aluminum_ 16. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. fY1V1dj6---,l /� Y, �eg K t � FREEMAN FRENCH FREEMAN, INC. MEMORANDUM IDX SYSTEMS CORPORATION EXPANSION, S. BURLINGTON ,VT PROJECT NO. A9821 DATE: November 30, 1998 TO: Robert Howe-, Vermont Dept. of Labor and Industry FROM: Bill Gardner RE: IDX Parking Garage, HC Accessibility Dear Bob, This is a brief memo to confirm our phone conversation of earlier today. The three story parking structure we are planning for the IDX site is to augment on site parking for the employees of IDX. There will be on grade H.C. accessible parking A R C HI T E ` t U R E spaces ( both regular and van spaces ) situated around the site as close as possible to ■ the different accessible entries per A. D.A. 4.6.2. Because the parking garage serves only this one building / tenant that has on grade accessible spaces adjacent to the P`A N"'"G building, the garage is not required to provide accessible parking spaces on any level. ■ This means an elevator will not be required in the three story parking structure. i rlTERiORS If this synopsis of the conversation is not a correct interpretation of our conversation or ■ is missing information, please let me know as soon as possible. Our design will proceed using this interpretation unless we hear otherwise. Thank -you for your time. Sincerely, Freeman French Freeman William Gardner, A.I.A. cc Jesse Beck, FFF John Caulo, Kessel/Duff 81 MAPLE STREET, P.O. BOX 306, BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0306 TEL 802/864 - 6844 FAX 802/860-1815 I i E 0.2ROOF CURB i BLDG. 5TH FLR. T.U. ROOF CURB BLDG. 4TN FLR ; . - - _ _ _ - _ BLDG. 3RD FOR. �r EL. 208.46, BLDG. 2NO FLR. � ELEL Imo— BLCG t5T FLR !-OTLINE OF EL. IB5.00�-� BA5EMENT LEVEL - EL. 173.17 ' NORTH ELs\/.,T I ON SCALE, 1/I6' - I'-O' wr=e7 ELE\/ATION _ SCALE. IA46" - P-0' T I, M � M = W L ! zWeo irr Wz uW� ro er.z us u 0 al ci ZE c�W W ad zz �g"Z Z W PROGRESS Y N Y O cA > O 1-- d W W z W 0 z 0 ac d �V) d A3.3 I J I EL6 F T 244.660. ROOF CURB #- _ - - H - - . '� BLOG. 5T�. - - - - - T.0 ROOF CURB < BLDG. 4TN FLR. --- ______________ DG. 3RD FLR. BLtf OUTLINE OF SECOND PHASE CONSTRUCTION ELF- 0- BLDG. 2ND FLR. 1. 196.63 BLCG I5T FLR F.L. 185.00' BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 17� ,,,- SOUTH ELE`/AtfON SCALE IAV - 1'-0' BA5EMENT LEVEL _ EL. I1 3� EAwt ELEvAtION 5CALE 1/I6' • 1'-0' usnumo-MMUMMEMMINIMEN ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ RM Sitework 130103MAY99 01 NOV99 Landscaping 40I01 MAY00 i23JUN00 Entry Plaza - Auto Court 6001MAY00 24JUL00 Parking Structure 160 15SEP00 30APR01 * Building 200 - Base building - 260 03MAY99 01 MAY00 East Wing Fit -up Basement & 29ksf 110 01 DEC99 02MAY00 * Fit -up 58 ksf Fit -up 58 ksf Building 200 - Base Bldg & Fit -up - West Wing Connecting Link - Base Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor fit -up Visioning Center Fit -up 110 01 DEC00 107MAY01 11003DEC01 07MAY02 240101MAY02 04APR03 i 26001JUN99 30MAY00 110 03JAN00 �02JUNOO 110 03JUL00 04DEC00 * I DX SYSTEMS CORPORATION SOUTH BURLINGTON CAMPUS EXPANSION CONSTRUCTION PHASING SCHEDULE Sitework AMLandscaping �� Entry Plaza - Auto Court ZVOMEMMMEW Parking Structure Building 200 - Base building - East Wing Fit -up Basement & 29ksf Fit -up 58 ksf Connecting Link - Base Building Connecting Link - 2nd Floor fit -up Ammmmw Visioning Center Fit -up ZVNENW Fit -up 58 ksf Date - KESSEUDUFF CORPORATION 57 TALCOTT ROAD WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 - -- Building 200 - Base Bldg & Fit -up - West Wing Revision H Z (1 j SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONTB I2/0b✓gL NO SCALE LX ?U TRUDILL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.��•�� GHK OFFICE OF11 WAGNER ALRAcNx0l6r0AP E 'PLANNeCcns (��••WL -, P 4 . rQ r"L— p4e'"� BUILDING PERSPECTIVE AP521 vwRN\y9E]1 \u1\�q` a+ ri t t v `::2 V^1 1 Ph NENGINEERS, ax S. BURLINGTON VERMGNT S/18at-0 O m � r!i� TRUDELL CONSULTING INC. -LANDSCAPEr — ' � ��- d OFFICE OF H ARGNITE RS •PLANNERS s12/08/98 j . IuuwN Er. ec crccrcrn ev: JB PROPOSED GARAGE ELEVS. A9821 THIRD FLOOR PLAN A4.1 SCALE- 1:40 Aa.l SECOND LEVEL PLAN SCALE- 1'=40'-0' I i I I I i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I f 7 1 i 1 �UP l I t I I t I I I I� I FIRST LEVEL PLAN Aa.i SCALE- 1'=40'-0' I am tl C y/ b t yt ¢ . 3 Z u w L� �t ''aa+ xa wso FW •�'y. YO wr2 � OZ2 U ' U V Z ~ D�w C� I W ~gam z W PROGRESS 00 am N F Z � N > F— CL O 1 Ld 0 Q Q z O 0 CD z z z Y I m Q ® vi 0 Q4.lr