HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 09_SP-21-01_20 Gregory Dr_The Granite Group#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
SP‐21‐01_20 Gregory Dr_The Granite Group_2021‐01‐
20.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: January 13, 2021
Application received: December 8, 2020
20 Gregory Drive
Site Plan Application #SP‐21‐001
Meeting date: January 20, 2021
Owner
20 Gregory Dr South Burlington VT LLC
6 Storrs St
Concord, NH 03301
Applicant
The Granite Group
20 Gregory Drive
South Burlington, VT 05403
Property Information
Tax Parcel ID 0740‐00020
Mixed Industrial & Commercial Zoning District
Engineer
Apex Engineering, LLC
1006 Decker Road
Georgia, VT 05468
Location Map
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
2
PROJECT DESCRPTION
Site plan application #SP‐21‐01 of The Granite Group to amend a previously approved plan for a 16,272
sq. ft. wholesale use building. The amendment consists of expanding the fenced outdoor storage area,
20 Gregory Drive.
PERMIT HISTORY
The Project is located in mixed industrial commercial zoning district. It is located just west of Muddy
Brook and the Town of Williston. It most recently received site plan approval #SP‐17‐57 to add the
existing outdoor storage area and minor related site improvements. There have been no other
development review applications for the property since it’s initial approval for construction in 1989.
COMMENTS
Planning Director Paul Conner and Development Review Planner Marla Keene (“Staff”) have reviewed
the plans submitted on 12/8/2020 and offer the following comments. Numbered items for the Board’s
attention are in red.
CONTEXT
Outdoor storage is only allowed in non‐residential districts upon approval of the DRB in conjunction with
a site plan, conditional use and/or PUD application (see LDR 13.05). The applicant has accordingly
submitted an application for site plan review.
As part of the proposed outdoor storage expansion, the applicant is proposing 1,520 sf of permanent
wetland buffer impacts and 3,100 sf of temporary wetland buffer impacts. Wetland buffer impacts are
addressed in 12.02.
Finally, the property is included in a stormwater management permit which encompasses the majority
of the Gregory Drive business park. The applicant is proposing to minimize the addition of impervious
surfaces to avoid the need to amend their permit and provide stormwater treatment and control for the
proposed expansion. Stormwater management standards are addressed in LDR 12.03.
Staff considers the general concept of the project to be generally consistent with the purpose and
details of the land development regulations, but there are potential issues related to wetland impacts
and stormwater management, described below.
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
3
B) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Setbacks, Coverages & Lot Dimensions
No new building is proposed.
AIR and AIR‐I District Required Proposed
Min. Lot Size 40,000 sf 119,354 sf
Max. Building Coverage 40% 13.6%, no change
Max. Overall Coverage 70% 29.4%
Max. Front Setback Coverage 30% 15.4%, no change
Min. Front Setback 30 ft 45 ft, no change
Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 30 ft, no change
Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 184 ft.
Height, flat roof 40 ft. 40 ft., no change
zoning compliance
C) 12.02 WETLAND PROTECTION
As noted above, there is an existing Class III wetland and associated 50‐foot wetland buffer located on the
site. The applicant notes on their plan “The Class Three wetland depicted is not the result of an onsite
wetland delineation. The location is based upon field observations and information obtained from the
Vermont Wetlands Department, including notes from a 2016 visit to the site by Tina Heath, Chittenden
County District Wetlands Ecologist.” Based on the assumed wetland boundary, the applicant is proposing
1,520 sf of permanent wetland buffer impacts and 3,100 sf of temporary wetland buffer impacts.
Staff and the City Stormwater Section have reviewed the proposed wetland impacts and consider that
more information is needed to evaluate compliance with 12.02 Wetland Protection Standards, as
enumerated below.
E. Standards for Wetlands Protection
(3) Encroachment into Class II wetland buffers, Class III wetlands and Class III wetland buffers,
may be permitted by the DRB upon finding that the proposed project’s overall development,
erosion control, stormwater treatment system, provisions for stream buffering, and
landscaping plan achieve the following standards for wetland protection:
(a) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or
store flood waters adequately;
1. The buffer proposed to be impacted is directly connected to Potash Brook, therefore Staff
considers it to be potentially a flood storage area. The applicant is proposing as much as four
feet of fill in this buffer area, though the volume of fill has not been quantified. Staff considers
more information is needed to determine whether the proposed encroachment has an adverse
effect on flood storage.
(b) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the proposed stormwater
treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards;
Staff interprets this criterion to mean that the encroachment shall not adversely impact the
erosion of sediment.
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
4
2. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide testimony on this criterion prior
to approval.
(c) The impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values
identified in the field delineation and wetland report is minimized and/or offset by
appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering, and/or other
mitigation measures.
The provided classification letter, dated 6/10/2016 and valid for five years, indicates that the
wetland does not provide function or value that is significant enough to merit protection under the
Vermont Wetland Rules at this time. This is because the State does not regulate Class III wetlands.
However, the City has chosen to apply the wetland protection standards to Class III wetlands and
buffers, as noted in the provided wetland classification letter.
3. Staff considers the applicant should prepare a written response demonstrating compliance with
this and other criteria of this section and, based on the identified functions and values, propose
mitigation or avoidance measures to offset the impacts.
D) 13.05 OUTDOOR STORAGE AND DISPLAY
A. Outdoor storage. Outdoor storage of goods, materials, vehicles for other than daily use, and
equipment shall be subject to the following provisions.
(1) Any outdoor storage shall be appurtenant to the primary use of the property and shall be
allowed only in nonresidential districts and upon approval of the DRB in conjunction with a
site plan, conditional use and/or PUD application
Staff recommends the Board confirm that the storage area will be used by the principal tenant
of the building.
(2) The Development Review Board may require that outdoor storage areas in connection with
commercial or industrial uses be enclosed and/or screened where the storage area may
comprise an attractive nuisance, where the proposed use of the storage areas present
opportunities for theft, or where the Board finds that said storage areas are in view of
residentially‐zoned parcels.
The applicant has stated that the existing storage area is enclosed by a chain link fence with
slats, which will be reused around the perimeter of the expanded storage area. It appears the
storage area is proposed to be only partially enclosed. Staff considers that if the applicant is
not concerned about theft via the opening in the enclosure, the opening faces away from
public view and is not an issue. Staff does, however, recommend the Board include a condition
that the fence be equipped with slats to provide screening in order to maintain an attractive
appearance to the site.
E) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general
review standards for all site plan applications:
A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan.
Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land
use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
5
The project is located in the Northwest Quadrant in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff considers
the proposed expansion of the current use consistent with the established uses in the area.
B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement,
and adequate parking areas.
The only proposed change to structures is the addition of a retaining wall along the proposed
ramp from the existing rear building door to the outdoor storage area. No changes to parking,
planting areas, pedestrian movement are proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing
a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this
subsection.
No changes to parking are proposed. While there appears to be one non‐compliant parking
space, Staff considers the proposed site modifications to not warrant rectifying this non‐
compliance.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated
adjoining buildings.
No changes to the building are proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions
between buildings of different architectural styles.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
No changes to the building are proposed. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing
fence around the existing outdoor storage area to encompass the proposed outdoor storage
area, as shown on the “Partial Site Plan” inset on Sheet C2‐01. Screening of the outdoor
storage area is discussed under 13.05 above. Staff considers other elements of these criteria
to be met.
In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific
standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations:
A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of
access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto
an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to
improve general access and circulation in the area.
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
6
No changes to access are proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire‐served utility lines and service connections shall
be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a
harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site.
No changes are proposed to the existing wire served utilities. Staff considers this criterion met.
C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance
with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with
opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s).
The existing dumpsters are enclosed within the outdoor storage area and are proposed to remain
within this area. Staff considers this criterion met.
D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13.06)
Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, landscaping and
screening shall be required for all projects subject to site plan review. The applicant is not proposing
any building improvements therefore no landscaping is required. Staff considers this criterion met.
F. Low Impact Development. The use of low impact site design strategies that minimize site
disturbance, and that integrate structures, landscaping, natural hydrologic functions, and
various other techniques to minimize runoff from impervious surfaces and to infiltrate
precipitation into underlying soils and groundwater as close as is reasonable practicable to
where it hits the ground, is required pursuant to the standards contained within Article 12.
As noted above, this project is subject to an existing state stormwater permit and includes more
than ½ acre of impervious. Projects already subject to stormwater management which add more
than 5,000 sf of new impervious are required to meet the standards of 12.03 Stormwater
Management Standards for the new impervious. The project proposes 1,945 sf of new impervious
in the form of a ramp from a new overhead door to the expanded outdoor storage area. The
expanded outdoor storage area is intended to be pervious. If it were impervious, it would be
subject to 12.03 Stormwater Management Standards.
Staff and the City Stormwater Section have reviewed the proposed expanded storage area and
consider that it may not be adequately designed to remain pervious over time. Specifically, the
applicant is proposing 12‐inches of 1 – 1 ½ inch clean drainage stone (which Staff assumes is the
same as saying 12‐inches of 1 – 1 ½ inch washed crushed gravel) topped with a 4‐inch “geocell
ground grid” product. Generally, gravel is considered to become impervious over time and is
therefore treated as impervious surface unless it can be specifically demonstrated that it is
installed in such a way that compaction and subsequent loss of permeability will not occur. Based
on available information, the specified product does not appear to be designed to remain
permeable.
4. Staff therefore recommends the Board request the applicant to demonstrate that the
proposed system will remain permeable over time, and if not, either specify a different system
or propose stormwater treatment for the expanded impervious.
G. Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation. Standards of Section 15.12 Standards for
Roadways, Parking, and Circulation shall be met.
No changes to roadways, parking and circulation are proposed. Staff considers this criterion met.
#SP‐21‐01
Staff Comments
7
F) OTHER
Lighting
Section 13.07 of the Land Development Regulations addresses exterior lighting as follows.
A. General Requirements. All exterior lighting for all uses in all districts except for one‐family
and two‐family uses shall be of such a type and location and shall have such shielding as
will direct the light downward and will prevent the source of light from being visible from
any adjacent residential property or street. Light fixtures that are generally acceptable are
illustrated in Appendix D. “Source of light” shall be deemed to include any transparent or
translucent lighting that is an integral part of the lighting fixture(s). Site illumination for
uncovered areas shall be evenly distributed. Where feasible, energy efficient lighting is
encouraged.
5. Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to describe whether any lighting is proposed
to be modified as part of this application.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board work with the applicant to address the issues identified herein.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
CLASS IIIWETLAND(SEE NOTES)12
675($0%8))(5
:(7/$1'%8))(5
:(7/
$
1
'
%
8
))(
5352-(&7,1)250$7,21 2:1(52)5(&25' 3+<6,&$/$''5(66 *5(*25<'5,9(6287+%85/,1*72197385326(2)'(6,*17+(6(3/$16$5(%(,1*68%0,77('72$&48,5(6,7(3/$1$33529$/)25$352326('352326(',1&5($6(,17+((;,67,1*287'2256725$*($5($)257+,63523(57<(;,67,1*&21',7,216127(6 7+,63/$1'(3,&767+(3(57,1(17(;,67,1*&21',7,216$62)129(0%(5 7+,63/$1,61277+(5(68/72)$%281'$5<6859(<7+(%281'$5<,1)250$7,21'(3,&7(':$62%7$,1(')520$66(66256
65(&25'6)25%281'$5<,1)250$7,216((3/$7(17,7/('68%',9,6,213/$72)*5((175((3$5.6+813,.(52$'6287+%85/,1*72197'$7('35(3$5('%<%<758'(//&2168/7,1*(1*,1((56,1& 9(57,&$/'$780,6%$6('211$9'*(,2' &225',1$7(6<67(0,6%$6('219(5021767$7(3/$1(866859(<)((7 7+(&/$667+5((:(7/$1''(3,&7(',61277+(5(68/72)$1216,7(:(7/$1''(/,1($7,217+(/2&$7,21,6%$6('8321),(/'2%6(59$7,216$1',1)250$7,212%7$,1(')5207+(9(50217:(7/$1'6'(3$570(17,1&/8',1*127(6)520$9,6,7727+(6,7(%<7,1$+($7+&+,77(1'(1&2817<',675,&7:(7/$1'6(&2/2*,67 7+(/2&$7,212)(;,67,1*81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(6$1',03529(0(1766+2:1$5(%$6('215(6($5&+87,/,7<3/$163529,'('%<27+(56$1'25685)$&((9,'(1&((1&2817(5('$1':(5(2%7$,1(',1$0$11(5&216,67(17:,7+7+(25',1$5<67$1'$5'2)352)(66,21$/&$5($1'+$9(127%((1,1'(3(1'(17/<9(5,),('%<7+(2:1(5257+('(6,*1(1*,1((5$'',7,21$/87,/,7,(61276+2:10$<(;,67(1*,1((56+$//%(127,),(',)$1<',6&5(3$1&,(6$5((1&2817(5('$&78$//2&$7,212)81'(5*5281'87,/,7,(60$<9$5<',*6$)(0867%(&217$&7('35,2572$1<(;&$9$7,21&$//',*6$)(=21,1*127(6=21,1*',675,&70,;(',1'8675,$/ &200(5&,$/,&0$;,0806,7(&29(5$*(%8,/',1*621/<%8,/',1*63$5.,1*$1'$//27+(5,03(59,286685)$&(66(7%$&.6)5217)((76,'()((75($5)((7/(*(1'3523(57</,1(6(7%$&.6%8))(5)(1&(&+$,1/,1.87,/,7<32/(%(1&+0$5.3$9(''5,9(2552$'&217285(;,67,1*/,*+7),;785(:(7/$1'('*(&217285352326('62,/67(673,7:(7/$1'%8))(5',6785%$1&(127(67(0325$5<,03$&7&216,'(5('72%(7+($5($2)%8))(5=21(%(7:((17+(352326('7(0325$5<6,/7)(1&($1'7+(352326('&+$,1/,1.)(1&(648$5()((73(50$1(17,03$&7&216,'(5('72%(7+($5($2)%8))(5=21(2&&83,('%<7+(352326('6725$*($5($(;3$16,21648$5()((76:$/(
December 2, 2020 Page 1Project Narrative – Site Plan Prepared by: Peter Mazurak, P.E. Project Name: 20 Gregory Drive - outdoor storage area.Project Location: The property is located along the east side of Gregory Drive and north of Kimball Ave. The 911 address is 20 Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403. The property is also designated as “Lot 13” of the Green Tree Park commercial subdivision.
Property Owner / Applicant: 20 GREGORY DR SOUTH BURLINGTON VT LLC, 6 Storrs Street,
Concord, NH, 03301
Detailed description of the proposed project: The applicants are proposing to increase the existing
outdoor storage area for a commercial building use on the site. A new overhead door will be installed
within the back wall of the building, (East side/facing brook). This door will lead out to the proposed
expanded outdoor storage area. No other buildings are proposed.
Demonstration of compliance with the applicable review standards: From a review of the applicable
review standards, in particular 13.05-Outdoor Storage and Article 14-Site Plan, it is our opinion that
the proposed project is in compliance.
List of submission elements
This Narrative
Site Plan entitled “The Granite Group”, date 11/11/2020, revised 12/02/2020 by Apex
Engineering, LLC.
List of waivers: None.
Restrictions, Covenants, Easements: The property contains a 35' x 35' easement for a building owned
by New England Telephone. No other restrictions, covenants, or easements are proposed.
Landscaping and Screening: The existing trees and tree buffer will remain unchanged. The existing
chain link fence with slats will be reused to line the edge of the expanded outdoor storage area. The
proposed storage area will be built in an area that contains a grassed lawn. The only vegetation
proposed to be disturbed is the grassed lawn.
Outdoor Storage area and Dumpsters: The site contains an existing fenced outdoor storage area (43'
x 76') that is proposed to be expanded to 63' x 115'. This storage area is used for piping and other
goods sold by the business. This area also contains two dumpsters used for the business.
Stormwater and Erosion Control: No State Stormwater permit is needed. This property is designated
as Lot 13 of the Green Tree Park subdivision and is covered under the state stormwater permit #
3409-INDS. It was determined that there is 2,000 square feet of allowable impervious area expansion
to remain below the 5,000 square foot allowance by the state. The area added to the outdoor storage
is proposed to be 3,800 square feet. Of this expansion, 1,945 square feet will be impervious pavement
and 1,855 square feet will be built with a permeable geo-grid. Stormwater runoff from the storage
area will be directed over grassed areas and rock lined swales to the existing stormwater basin on the
lot.
Page 2Erosion and sediment control will adhere to the Vermont “Low Risk Site Handbook”. Silt fence will be installed prior to the start of the earthwork. All disturbed areas will be restored with topsoil, seed and mulch. An existing crushed stone overflow area adjacent to the existing outdoor parking area will be expanded. Wastewater and Water systems, power service, natural gas service: No changes proposed. Access to Property: There is an existing access driveway extending from Gregory Drive for access. The parking area contains well marked vehicle parking spaces for both customers and staff. There
are two marked handicapped accessible parking spaces near the front entrance of the building. A
bicycle rack is located near the front entrance of the building.
Project Construction Schedule: Once approved, it is estimated that the construction of the project will
take approximately 2 weeks. If the construction was to occur in the winter, the final paving and
landscaping would occur the next spring. The estimated costs of the improvements is $45,000.
&ƌŽŵ͗,ĞĂƚŚ͕dŝŶĂ^ĞŶƚ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕:ƵŶĞϭϬ͕ϮϬϭϲϭϭ͗ϰϯDdŽ͗ΖDŝĐŚĂĞůDĂŝŶĞƌΖ^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗Z͗tĞƚůĂŶĚůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲϮϬ'ƌĞŐŽƌLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ŽƵƚŚƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶǡ ǤǤ
͚͘
Ǥ
͞Ȁ͠Ȁ͚͙͘͞ǡ Ǥ
ǣ
ǡ
͜Ǥ͞Ǥ
ǣ
Ǥ ǡǡ
ǡǤ ǡ
Ǥ Ǧ
Ǥȋ͚͘͠Ǧ͚͟͠Ǧ͚͛͠͡Ȍ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
͚͘͠Ǧ͘͜͡Ǧ͚͚͘͞
Ǥ̻Ǥ
͙͙͙
ǡ͚͘͜͝͝
ǤǤǤ
ǯǡ Ǥ
&ƌŽŵ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂŝůƚŽ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵKŶĞŚĂůĨKĨDŝĐŚĂĞůDĂŝŶĞƌ
^ĞŶƚ͗DŽŶĚĂLJ͕DĂLJϮϯ͕ϮϬϭϲϮ͗ϯϲWD
dŽ͗,ĞĂƚŚ͕dŝŶĂфdŝŶĂ͘,ĞĂƚŚΛǀĞƌŵŽŶƚ͘ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗tĞƚůĂŶĚůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲϮϬ'ƌĞŐŽƌLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ŽƵƚŚƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ
+L7LQD
7KDWVRXQGVOLNHDSODQ,
OOSODQRQ-XQHWKDW,W
VDW*UHJRU\'ULYHLQ6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQLI,KDYHQ
WPHQWLRQHGWKDW
DOUHDG\ZKHUH*UDLQJHUXVHGWREH
7KDQNV0LNH2Q0RQ0D\DW$0+HDWK7LQD7LQD+HDWK#YHUPRQWJRY!ZURWHǤ
͠ǤǤǡ
ǡ
͚͘͠Ǧ͘͜͡Ǧ͚͚͘͞
Ǥ̻Ǥ
͙͙͙
ǡ͚͘͜͝͝
ǤǤǤ
ǯǡ Ǥ
&ƌŽŵ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂŝůƚŽ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵKŶĞŚĂůĨKĨDŝĐŚĂĞůDĂŝŶĞƌ
^ĞŶƚ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕DĂLJϮϬ͕ϮϬϭϲϭϬ͗ϬϯD
dŽ͗,ĞĂƚŚ͕dŝŶĂфdŝŶĂ͘,ĞĂƚŚΛǀĞƌŵŽŶƚ͘ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗tĞƚůĂŶĚůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲϮϬ'ƌĞŐŽƌLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ŽƵƚŚƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ
+L7LQD
&XUUHQWXVHLVDZDUHKRXVHSURSRVHGXVHLVDXWRPRELOHVDOHV VHUYLFH7RSHUPLWWKLVFKDQJHRIXVHZH
GQHHGWRDGG
SDUNLQJDVUHTXLUHGE\WKHFLW\
V]RQLQJUXOHV7KH&LW\
V]RQLQJUXOHVDOVRFRQILQHXVWRDIDLUO\VPDOODUHDRQWKHHDVWVLGHRIWKH
VLWHDODUJHSDUWRIZKLFKLVRFFXSLHGE\WKHZHWODQGDQGLW
VIRRWEXIIHU,
YHSOD\HGZLWKVRPHOD\RXWRSWLRQVEXWZHWKLQN
ZH
OOSUREDEO\QHHGWRXVHDWOHDVWDSRUWLRQRIWKHEXIIHU
7KDQNV
0LNH
2Q7KX0D\DW30+HDWK7LQD7LQD+HDWK#YHUPRQWJRY!ZURWH
ǡ
Ǥ ǫǯ
ǯ Ǥǯ͚Ǧ͛Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ ͚͘͠Ǧ͘͜͡Ǧ͚͚͘͞Ǥ̻Ǥ
͙͙͙
ǡ͚͘͜͝͝
ǤǤǤ
ǯǡ Ǥ
&ƌŽŵ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵŵĂŝůƚŽ͗ŵĂŝŶĞƌ͘ŵŝĐŚĂĞůΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵKŶĞŚĂůĨKĨDŝĐŚĂĞůDĂŝŶĞƌ
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕DĂLJϭϴ͕ϮϬϭϲϭϬ͗ϰϰD
dŽ͗,ĞĂƚŚ͕dŝŶĂфdŝŶĂ͘,ĞĂƚŚΛǀĞƌŵŽŶƚ͘ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗tĞƚůĂŶĚůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶͲϮϬ'ƌĞŐŽƌLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ŽƵƚŚƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ
+L7LQD
:H
YHJRWDSRWHQWLDOSURMHFWLQ6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQZLWKVRPHSRVVLEOHZHWODQGLPSDFWV:H
UHWU\LQJWRGHFLGHLIWKHVPDOO
ZHWODQGLQWKHPLGGOHRIWKHVLWHLVDFODVV,,RU,,,ZHWODQG7KHORFDWLRQLVIDLUO\FOHDURQVDWHOOLWHLPDJHU\
KWWSVJRRJOPDSV<K+RQ[9&K*
'HOLQHDWLRQVKRXOGEHIDLUO\HDV\EXWEHIRUHZHGRWKDWZHQHHGWRGHFLGHKRZUHDVRQDEOHZRUNLQWKDWDUHDZRXOGEHWR
EHJLQZLWK
,ZDVKRSLQJWRVHWXSDWLPHIRUDVLWHYLVLWWKHSURSHUW\LVRQWKHPDUNHWVRWKLVLVVRPHZKDWWLPHVHQVLWLYHWKRXJK,
XQGHUVWDQG\RXURIILFHLVYHU\EXV\/HWPHNQRZZKDWZRUNVEHVWZLWK\RXUVFKHGXOH
7KDQNV
0LNH
0LNH0DLQHU
(QJLQHHULQJ,QWHUQ
*URYHU(QJLQHHULQJ3&
0LNH0DLQHU
(QJLQHHULQJ,QWHUQ
*URYHU(QJLQHHULQJ3&
For: Granite GroupProject: 20-021 Soil EvaluationSite: 20 Gregory Drive, South Burlington, VTBy: Peter Mazurak, P.E.Date: 11/16/2020TP 1 Mottling @48”- Common, Medium, Distinct,10YR4/60-8” A/Fill Sandy Loam Granular 10 YR 3/48-48” C1/ Fill Sandy Loam Granular 10YR 4/3
48-56” C2 Clay Loam Blocky / Weak 10YR 6/2
TP 2 Mottling @36”- Common, Medium, Distinct,10YR4/6
0-4” A/Fill Sandy Loam Massive 10YR 3/4
4-36” C1/Fill Loamy Sand Granular, Cobbly 2.5Y 5/4
36-40” C2 Clay Loam Blocky / Weak 10YR 6/2
Infiltration testing result: 0.9 inches / hour
Vtotal 340.4 Cubic Feet
where: Ap 1918 Equation 4-9
n0.33
dt 1
fc 0.9
t2
Volume to be satisfied 335.7 Cubic Feet
where: Ap 1918 Equation 4-10
P1yr 2.1