Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 1340 1342 1344 Shelburne Road
March 15, 2018 Re: #SP-17-81 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Si ncerei aymond 1. Belalr Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Permit Number SP-�- U (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Vermont Industrial Parks 2464 Case St. Middlebury, VT 05753 802-388-6363 phone 802-388-9010 Fax 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): BK 1332 Pg. 282 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Mark Sammut Wright & Morrissey, Inc. 99 Swift St. #100 S. Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-4541 Office / 802-865-1253 fax/ 802-238-2133 Mobile 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Same as above - Applicant 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: msammut@wmorrissey.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 41 IDX Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00041 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Conversion of existing office space it a spa and personal services use b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Retail 6292 SF; Personal Service 2703 SF; Medical Office 1788 SF General Office (occupied) 7657 SF General Office (Vacant) 8037 SF c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remajn): Retail 6292 SF; Personal ervice 5068 SF; Medical Office 1788 SF General Office (occupied) 7657 SF General Office (Vacant) 5672 SF d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 29,424 SF (26,477 leasable) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 34 Feet 2 Floors f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): None g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Approximately 40 total, of which 30 are office employees h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): None Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 105,640 Existing 14.1 % / Proposed % / Sq. Ft. 14,941 sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 68.8 % / 72,708 sq. ft. Proposed 68.8 % / 72,708 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. Proposed 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) zero * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: S 62,000 $0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 0 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): no change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: no change 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: no change 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: March 2018 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. L Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E w NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Digi signe0"Mark S. Sammut Mark S. Sammu {N£US;nm Nmmk S. S. mtccm O-'W ght& wiomsaey, Inc -ammut k S. orr—y F n: attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document - - Dah!2017.112015:3707-05M' SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Bill Townsend for Vt. Ind. P SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Signature for Property Owner attached as separate page Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete l Administrative Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 4 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATUR"(E OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4 I / / � r REVIEW AUTHORITY: F Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete In ete— IM7117 Administrative fficer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Mark Sammut <msammut@wmorrissey.com> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 11:14 AM To: ray Subject: Shelburne Square Spa -Clinic SD Plan 10182017.pdf Attachments: Shelburne Square Spa -Clinic SD Plan 10182017.pdf Ray, The attached plan shows 5 " Treatment rooms" and one Spray Tan Booth" which I believe would get us to six treatment rooms. The proposed space is 2300 SF Existing parking requirement 2.3 x 3.5 = 8.05 spaces Proposed parking Rqmt. 6 stations x 2 = 12 spaces Net add to required parking spaces = 4 spaces Please let me know if you agree and I will have these calculations shown on the drawing I send in for resubmission. Thanks. Mark S. Sammut Project Manager Wright & Morrissey, Inc. 99 Swift Street, Suite 100 South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-4541 ext. 20 802-865-1253 fax 802-238-2133 cell msammut@wmorrissey. com Shelburne Square Wastewater Existing Flows Estimate Prepared by Green Mountain Engineering 1/15/18 Space Description SF Employees Calculation Estimated Flow (gpd)' Small Dry Good Store Talbots Department Store 5292 100 GPD/Store 100 5 15 GPD/Employee 75 Personal Services 5 Treatment Stations 5068 5 150 GPD/Chair (5) 750 4 10 GPD/Employee 40 VT Naturopathic Clinic 3 Exam Rooms 1788 5 35 GPD/Employee 175 General Offices Insurance, Weight Solutions 7657 25 15 GPD/Employee 375 General Offices Currently Vacant 5672 40 15 GPD/Employee 600 Common Area Shared Space 2947 n/a I n/a n/a TOTAL 2115 Shelburne Square Wastewater Proposed Flows Estimate Prepared by Green Mountain Engineering 1/15/18 Space Description SF Employees Calculation Estimated Flow (gpd) Small Dry Good Store Talbots Department Store 5292 100 GPD/Store 100 5 15 GPD/Employee 75 Personal Services 11 Treatment Stations 5068 11 150 GPD/Chair (11) 1650 10 10 GPD/Employee 100 VT Naturopathic Clinic 3 Exam Rooms 1788 5 35 GPD/Employee 175 General Offices Insurance, Weight Solutions 7657 25 15 GPD/Employee 375 General Offices Currently Vacant 5672 40 15 GPD/Employee 600 Common Area Shared Space 2947 n/a n/a n/a TOTAL 3075 Current Allocation WW4-0061-1 1650 GPD WW4-0061-2 2250 GPD Tota 1 3900 GPD l3 GRAPHIC SCALE ( Dr r¢r ) D .�� (15) LOW GROW SUMAC 113j MISS KIM \ EXSTING DUMPSTER \ ENCLOSURE EXISTING COOLING \I _ 1 � TOWER 2 LL 1 _ h H BUILDING / SJ�_v,. CLj n STONEDUST WITH METAL EDGING t14,940BSF 9 .- __ (1)SALVIA I ~ w SD VERTICIIUTA 7=El j STONE DUST PATIO I (12)p1ERVILLA. � 1 1 BENCH (TyP.) c G ` _ _ _ _ 1 (16) MISS KIM LAWN `3 iii2iii 3 (124) MIS THUS p LAWN _ �(19)SALVIA VER GMCILLIMUS - �1�✓�/ BIKE RACK \ 1 (I -A DIERVILIA • BUSH NON C \ I (93) RUSSIAN SAGE /\'S �5 \ ()RED TWIG DOGWOOD 'Y (55)aWL EOERSrER', �� S (47) LO{V GRO 1 CONCR�FE 11R1At (n MISS KIM I 1\ WALK a. I 13 V A� sT � \ 25STORAGE `1 I V LLT IDX DRIVE z z a 0� �a z J 0 SITE PLAN o SCALE: 1"=20' --_..... LLI a p D_ a O Lu i L, Z Y a � a � �a�axeo .wre AM xc 12I05/17 PROJECT INFORMATION THESE RECORD DOCUMENTS HAVE BEENPREPARED JJB 1' = 20' BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS. TOTAL LOT: 105,640 SQ. FT. PARKING THE CONSULTANTHASNOT VERUIED 7HEACCURACYANDIOR wea�All DEC. 2017 ' COA&LETENESS OF nas INFORMA770AFAND TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 74,021.E SQ. FT. REQUIRED: 122 SHALL NOTBERESPONSBLEFOR ANYERRORS OR OMISSIONS PROJECT NO. BUILDING: 14,940.8 SO. FT. PROVIDED: 142 + 6 ADA SPACES THATMAYBEPVCORPORATEOASARESULTOF 26-016.00 WALKS AND DRIVE S9,081 SQ. FT ERRONEOUS INFORMA77ONPROPMED BY OTHERS. PERCENTAGE IMPERVIOUS: 70.0% DRAWING NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 w p ray From: Mark Sammut <msammut@wmorrissey.com> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 2:52 PM To: ray Cc: Bill Townsend Subject: 41 IDX Drive Attachments: 41 IDX Dr. change of use parking calcs.pdf; Carrara Record Drawing 12-1-17 with comments per mtg with Ray Belair.pdf Ray, The Owner of 41 IDX Drive tells me they intend to comply at 100% of the required bike parking spaces. Given the season, the intent is to complete pads and bike racks in the spring as weather allows. I am attaching the Owners parking calculations for the existing and proposed new uses. The required parking spaces shown on the drawing I submitted reflects the spaces required when you include the spaces required to accommodate the proposed personal service use. I have asked the Owner to have their engineer remove the sign reference and the landscaping tables from the drawing. As soon as I receive the revised drawing I will drop them at your office. Thanks Mark S. Sammut Project Manager Wright & Morrissey, Inc. 99 Swift Street, Suite 100 South Burlington, VT 05403 802-863-4541 ext. 20 802-865-1253 fax 802-238-2133 cell msammut@wmorrissey.com , 'Irj, .,. , , - k:F • ("°' ,`✓,2T", *,,. fi; W'�:lt', £ i sh000 o^4''yt -at 0 }. . Ao 6t . opp rc vet66 2. 9L,7 [ S 7 t ,'I z 7 ( -i" t.. Oat k,,. "^.#�.. � � �',MR . 'a`$� � Rd,�'« �i} ei..'-3�6 e;..�ak � .« ✓ "e j August 26, 2016 Re: #SP-16-57 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer R/ymond J. Belalr Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com P southburlington. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-j"Y - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW [ Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and tax #): Vermont Industrial Parks 2464 Case Street, Middlebury, VT 05753 802-388-6363 (phone); 802-388-9010 (fax) 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): Bk 1332, Pg 282 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Vermont Industrial Parks; 2464 Case Street, Middlebury, VT 05753 802-388-6363 (phone); 802-388-9010 (fax) 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Bill Townsend Vermont Industrial Parks; 2464 Case Street, Middlebury, VT 05753 802-388-6363 (office); 802-989-8252 (mobile) 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: btownsend(a�jpcarrara.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 41 IDX Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00041 57S Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Improvements to the site, to include the replacement of dead landscaping; the addition of a sitting area; the removal of old structures; the relocation of some ADA parking; the elimination of some parking spaces, and the minor reconfiguration of some of the accessible routes. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Retail - 6,292 sf; personal service - 2,703 sf; medical office - 1,788 sf; general office (occupied)- 7,657 sf; general office (vacant) - 8,037 sf c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Same as above. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 29,424 sf (26,477 leasable) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 34 feet; 2 floors f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): None g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Approximately 40 total, of which approximately 30 are office employees h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 IJ 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 105,640 Existing 14.1 % / Proposed 14.1 % / Sq. Ft. 14,941 sq. ft. 14,941 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 69.9 % / 73,854 sq. ft. Proposed 68.8 % / 72,708 _sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. Proposed 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) Appx.11,000 sf * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $0 $ 50,000 Remove old structures; repair and replace deteriorated concrete walks, steps and curbing; reconfigure accessible routes - $30,000 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No change 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: No change 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: October 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time/of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee® schedule �1^ 4-4 ��Y1� bj& Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one p� digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF A LICANT Bill Townsend SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: v/� / / REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Lff-comp The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 { I LANDSCAPE PLANTING QUANTIFIED PER ORIGINAL PLANTING PLAN AND FIELD VERIFICATION IEes„ Quantity Umt Unit Cost Um[T—I Sub -so sal PLANT MATERIAL REMOVED Jun,petus chnenss- And— Juniper 257 EA $4500 $11.565.00 Rosa rug— 12 EA $100.00 $T200A0 Nepea Gtrn nt 5 EA $2200 511000 Ins 18 EA $15.00 $27000 Pbnsng $.—I $13, 145.00 Submtal $13.145.00 ✓, "4 Item Quantity Unit Unit Cast Unit T-1 sub-mml REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL Fnnge Tree 3 EA $100. DO 330000 Miss Kim bbc - 10 gal. 29 EA $150.00 $4,350.00 Du 11.- Bush Honeysuckle- 2 ga 1. 25 EA $55.00 $1,375.00 —G-Sumac.3 gal. 112 EA $75.00 $8,400.00 Ninebark-Physoraspus I,-,-3 ga1 39 EA $75.00 $2.925.00 Red Tvj D.".o - 3 gal. 5 EA $75.00 $375 00 Karl Foerstet - Feather Reed Grass - 2 gal. [ I S EA $22.00 $2,530.00 R-- Sage - I gal. 100 EA $20.00 $2,000.00 Nesanthus g—lh--Maiden Fhlr IS,--2 gel. 123 EA $25.00 $3,075.00 SaN,a v u'llaa -Sage- I gal. 59 EA $22.00 $1,298.00 Pbnu,g Subtotal $26.628.00 Sub —I $26.628.00 *100 PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING BENCHES REQUIRED:107 TOTAL:6 TOTAL LOT: 10S,640 SQ. FT. PROVIDED: 130 + 6 ADA EVA BENCH; 6' LENGTH TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 72,708.1 SQ. FT. SPACES SOLID STEEL FRAME W/ TITANIUM FINISH] BUILDING: 14,940.8 SQ. FT. IPE WOOD SLATS WALKS AND DRIVE: 57,767.3 SQ. FT BY VICTOR STANLEY PERCENTAGE IMPERVIOUS: 68.9% P.O. DRAWER 330 DUNKIRK, MD 20754 1.800.368.2573; 1.301.855.8300 WWW.victarstanleyxam IDX DRIVE DUMPSTER IRE 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET WAGNER SHELBURNE SQUARE LANDSCAPE PLAN REVISIONS 08.18.16 08.24.16 DRAWING NO. IOB NO, 641 SCALE 1" = 20 " LO.0DATE 08.02.16 m VA iff-I i I I F14 rm 72 il_m_ - - a OIA oo-� l ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 6:45 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Application for Site Plan Review - 41 IDX Drive Ray, That plan looks OK Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert(a sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:31 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: FW: Application for Site Plan Review - 41 IDX Drive Craig, I'm sending you a hard copy of the attached plan. They are going to be removing some plants and replacing them with more plants. Please let me know your comments. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return entail. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Bill Townsend[mailto:btownsend@jpcarrara.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:58 PM To: ray <ray@sburl.com> 1 PLANNING & Z O N I N G May 24, 2016 Re: #SP-16-29 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer, , R mond J. l3elair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com PONAINNO 1 10 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- (office use only) APPL ATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW 7Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Plaza Investments, 28 Day Lane, Williston, VT 05495-4420 phone 764-1630 x205, fax 764-1632 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 272/218 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Same 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Karl Marchessault, O'Leary -Burke, 13 Corporate Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 phone 878-9990 fax 878-9989 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: karlm@olearyburke.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 41 IDX Drive, South Burlington 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0915-00041 C 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): To show the existing cooling tower in the back of the building and finish the fence to form a 4-sided enclosure for the dumpsters. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office, medical, personal service, retail mixed uses as shown on plan. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No changes d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 25,720 sf - No Changes e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 34' existing building - No Changes f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): None g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Unknown for multiple uses - No changes h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): None Site Plan Application Form Rev 12-2011 d 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 105,640 Existing 13.8 % / Proposed 13.8 % / Sq. Ft. 14606 sq. ft. 14606 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 69.9 % / 73,820 sq. ft. Proposed 69.9 % / 73,854 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. Proposed 10.3 % / 10,888 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) b. Landscaping: $0 $0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): None 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Same as approved 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Same as approved 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Same as approved 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: April, 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information requited by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17" ), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the cty's fee schedule. �- .7 lt7 * a4 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 D NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. TURE OF APPLICANT -� 1710-rV 15rO w SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board E Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 110 _ EXISTING WOOD FEI EXI5TING CONCRETE PAD 1N lop LOCATION PLAN NT5 O w� `V W N J 'i/I\------------- ----------------- --------------------------- EXISTING WOOD 1 i I FENCED ENGL05URE FINISH FENCE A✓ WITH GATE ° ENGL05UKE WITH 0 % w EXISTING GATE FOR AGGE55 0 i1 �LL EX15TING 2-5TORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING GOOLING TOWER G EXI5TING GR055 LEA5ABLE AREA BY USE GR055 LEA5ABLE AREA BY FLOOR DUMPSTERS 0 15,503 5Q. FT OFFICE 5PAGE 15T FLOOR 13,970 5Q. FL1,788 5Q. FT. MEDICAL OFFICE 2ND FLOOR 11,750 5Q. FT. (ALL OFFICE U5E) G2,137 Lis SO, FT. PEK50NAL 5EKVIGE 25,720 5Q. FT. (TOTAL) 6292 5Q FT. RETAIL G '25,720 5Q FT. (TOTAL) Z�J SP. CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE WALK " 3 15 SP15 SP. I QW 1 10 ! SP 00 BOLLARD- MULCHED 15LAND �TYP. It SP. ✓R� TYPE LIGHTING /TYPICAL) �HJ G 16 5P. 40 BENCH SEAT' G I W M �(TYPICAL) BIKE RACK C M x_ WOODEN PLANT GONTAINERS w o o o o e CONCRETE WALKCONCRETE WALK AJ G D LL 5NO I /Tr A/ If'rI -31 22 SP. D 5TORA 11 I�ST-ING L_5_L 4 -----------------___.____ COMfAGT GAR 5P'AGE5 --------- 013 SP. AJ G G G G G G G G G G G G G5 G G G ---- G G G i) G G G G rc STORAGE od — _ £{ LL G{ £{ I Ham. LL AP* — EXISTING 5/DEWALK LL lGNI — _TABLE AP >.IIKr_ _SPRUGE TREE --- -- _ 10X DR / VE o 500' FROM CENTERLINE OF SHELBUKNE ROAD F I PLANT L /5 T KEY BOTANICAL NAME 0HJ PKUNU5 "H.J." LL TILIA CORDATA �AP PINU5 NIGRA CG CORNU5 MA5 ' AJ JUNIPERU5 GHINEN PR A550RTED PERENNIALS -VARIETIE5 TO INCLUDE A5TILBE, GOREOP5I5, DIANTHU5, DELPHINIUM, LUPINE, 5HA5TA DAISY, PHLOX, WHITE MARROW, CAMPANULA JV JUNIPERU5 VIRGINIANA TO THUJA OCCIDENTAL15 ORIGINAL LAN05G PE PLAN BY FITZPATRIGK - L EWELLYN INC. COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE REMARKS PROJECT INFORMATION DRAWN NOV. /988, LA57- REV15ION HALLY JOLIYETTE DATE "1-6-89; NOTED AS 1-6-88. CHERRY LITTLE -LEAF LINDEN AU5TRIAN PINE CORNELIAN CHERRY ANDORRA JUNIPER PERENNIALS UPRIGHT JUNIPER THUJA 13 11 14 53 257 200 1 1/2 - 2 3' - 3 1/2" B+B 7' - 8" B+5 18" - 24" G I GAL C 7 6 - 7' 8 6' 7' N OC J WIv>9N1 r�IRra �i4yiA'e EXISTING SLOPE PLANTED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX 5PRUGE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 4 EXISTING LIGHT GURB LINE 0 o WOOD FENCE - - - - - - - - - - - BUILDING 5ETBAGK 71 I G 4_4 Mi1KG7 PROVIDED 147 PARKING 51"AGE5 (6 HANDIGAN REQUIRIED 123 PARKING 5PAGE5 THE PURPOSE OF TH15 PLAN 15 TO UPDATE THE USES ON THI5 PARCEL AND INCLUDE A SNOW STORAGE AREA 5ETBAGK, 5HELBURNE ROAD 50 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE AND SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 5ET15AGK, IDX DRIVE 30 FEET m , o EXI5TIN& BIKE RAGK. THE 517E WAS SETBACK, 2 SIDE YARD= 15 FEET FIELD GHEGKED ON 10/4/05 AND WAS L= s=f-�- UPDATED FROM A PREVIOUS 517E PLAN ( IN FE'T) TO SHOW THE PARKING 5PAGE5 AND i i_I, = 20 eL OTHER GENERAL AMENITIES AS SHOWN HEREON. 05/06/16 KEV15E GATE FOR DU TER ENGL05URE. ADD LOOLING TOWER KGM LEASADLE AREA TO ADD MEDICAL OFF— RGM { ►F� ''`1 AMNY °T °`5��' WL'r , rwM ucTa/tuxcF/ Shelburne Square//2'"°' .lr _ s a 6 —"� 77 X =— rjo/oTF A 7� v u 1�.L1V OTAR 1—DU.C. South Burl�ngian Vermont M21 ?f/ 1 DVR/K&M CIVIL ASSOCIATES, PLC Change Use —TO room I .10 s NUE.s Main ma®pIM1.wm of Site Plan 1 Karl Marchessault From: Karl Marchessault Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 1:38 PM To: Ray Belair (rbelair@sburl.com) Subject: Talbots - IDX Drive - OBCA #2021 Attachments: 2021-NEVILLE-050616 - IDX DRIVE.pdf Good afternoon Ray — I added the cooling tower and Mery Brown said he would enclose the dumpsters. I've made the changes to the plan (enclosed email copy). I will make 3 full size, 1 reduced 11 x 17 and get Mery to sign the application and bring it over with a check for $223 later today. Thanks for all your help. Karl Marchessault, P.E. Project Engineer O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC 13 Corporate Drive Essex Junction, VT 05452 Phone (802) 878-9990 Fax (802) 878-9989 kO� e-4 PLANNING & ZONING September 12, 2011 Re: #SP-11-40 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months If you have any questions, please contact me. Since ly, C Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.coin al ®R south` rfingto PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-11 - V6 (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. QWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as srown on deed, mgAling address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APP1LICANT/r.(Name, mailing address, phone and fax #):-0t .Ck- •�.-L1'VZ�,� me,"is C'. 0 t�lr✓Y11��_ lfYY�)�)1i�� 30 cq � ��A��lit !, (fm-k I1✓Ir� ., —ter , , 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will rgceive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): k l . , f*,..,.. 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: )9 �\ ; r n tC;C & XU'v�WiL (u •(c `rn 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): C C� \ 5 —6 CCI—k 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General proiect description (explain what you want approval for): b. Exi ting Uses on Property (includi descriptionn `and size of each separate use): �?t mat 1 GS 1 C�� TOL Cti c"( Cw i CC ]S9 c. Proposed Uses on roperty (inc ude description and sizq of each new use a d existin '! uses to remain): lvkk 0-f�l - ,1,�`1-K a /�C i �nGt l i �1 iSA"I d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): `�, 220 e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): ,4 FjcTrS f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): J� g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: J()l,�. L Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 2q.(b % / .25 1 '720 sq. ft. Proposed% / Z`5 , sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed % / d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) sq. ft. sq. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 6M b. Landscaping: $ /U� w c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): A II )q- 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 2 ' 6D C4,h eM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: A-IGVi ` Oif C(" 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: ,Jed% ba- 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. GNATURE OF SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: � // REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer 1 have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Inc triplet A --4 Administrative Officer date The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 5 mr. AP { EXI5TIN& 6 BASKET WEAVE HF ❑ 6' 5CREENING FE ---- LOCATION PLAN PLANT L /5 T KEY BOTANICAL NAME 0HJ PRUNU5 "H.J. �aS LL TILIA CORDATA AP PINU5 NIGRA CG CORNU5 MA5 AJ JUNIPERU5 CHINEN PR ASSORTED PERENNIALS -VARIETIES 70 INCLUDE A57'IL15E. GOREOP515, DIANTHU5, DELPHINIUM, LUPINE, 5HA577A 0A15Y, PHLOX, WHITE MARROW. CAMPANULA JV JUNIPERU5 VIR(5INIANA TO THUJA OCCIDENTALI5 --------------------------- _. _. .. -...._ _. -_. ---. _.. EXISTING TRASH GA ----n-- ON CONCRETE PAD A✓ u 1 w EXISTING DUMPSTE I 1 wwwwww I w �LL I EXISTING 2-5TORY COMMERCIAL 6UILDING GROSS LEA5A13LE AREA DY U5EyP055 LEA5ADLE"AREA DY FLOOR I :PR v ?ii;• IS;S03 SQ. FT: OFFICE SPADE 15T FLOOR 13.970. SQ. FT. •,4 �, 1.788 50_ FT; MEDICAL OFFICE 2ND FLOOR 11.750 5Q. FT. (ALL OFFICE 1 SE) G n 2.137 SQ. FT. PER5ONAL 5ERVICE 25,720 5Q.. FT. (TOTAL( _ 1 `�r 6.292 SQ, FT. RETAIL- 1 w �'°•' 25,720 50 FT. (TOTAL) i rlti v 20 51". CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE WALK 0 J3 15 5P, 15 5P. 1 10 SP w11 BOLLARD- MULCHED 15LAND II SP. TYPE LIGHTING HU TYP. C 16 5P.. A (TYPICAL/ BENCH 5EAT ( G i M (TYPICAL) WOODEN 1 M 1 G �S WOODEN PLANT CONTAINERS CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE WALK *22122212 J622112 u 1121112220. G EXTRA A ins' LL SNOW �l 4"00S TORA 22 SP. 0 0� I � `� EXISTING 1i O L-51CaN_ _ _ _ -------- I� �_______________ COMPACT GAR SPACES \--------------------- _ _ O O \ 13 SP. A✓ C C C C G G G G G G G G GS G G G G G G G G G G G G STORAGE Q Ii / GG k- G 1. Hn es AP� EX/ST/NG 5/OEWALK �, �id�l�Y1 LLtJGS TABLE AP� - —SPRUCE TREE 10X DP l VE o 500FROM CENTERLINE OF SHELBURNE ROAD F O � — J AOT5; ORIGINAL LAN05GAPE PLAN BY FITZPATRIGK - LLEWELLYN INC. COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE REMARKS PROJECT INFORMATION DRAWN NOV. 1988. LA57' REV15ION DATE "I-6-89'; NOTED A5 1-6-88. fim 10 at�'l1 5PRUGE EXISTING SLOPE PLANTED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX $CI ElvE:t,j SEP 0 7 4? City of So. Budington LEGEND PROPERTY LINE 4 EXISTING LIGHT CURD LINE WOOD FENCE ----------- OUILDIN6 SETBACK HALLY JOLIYETTE 13 1 1/2 - 2 SITE 2..4 ACKE5 CHERRY LITTLE -LEAF LINDEN II 3' - 3 112" 6+B PROVIDED 147 PARKING 5PAGE5 (6 HANDICAP) REQUIRED 123 PARKING 5PAGE5 THE PUKP05E OF THI5 PLAN 15 TO AUSTRIAN PINE 14 7' - 8" B+B UPDATE THE U5E5 ON TH15 PARCEL AND INCLUDE A SNOW STORAGE AREA SETBACK. 5HELDURNE ROAD: 50 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE AND SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE CORNELIAN CHERRY 53 18" - 24" G 5ETDACK, IDX DRIVE: 30 FEET o EXISTING DIKE RACK. THE SITE WAS SETBACK. 2 51DE YARD: 15 FEET FIELD CHECKED ON 10/4/05 AND WA5 ANOORRA JUNIPER 257 I GAL G UPDATED FROM A PREVIOUS 51TE PLAN ( IN FEET) TO SHOW THE PARKING 5PAGE5 AND PERENNIALS 200 -Inch men - 20 fl OTHER GENERAL AMENITIES A5 SHOWN HEREON. ovovll REVI5e oR055 LEA—E AREA TO ADD REMOVE S MT — RESTAu Aro ADD TO OF OA/OA/II - REVISE 4RO55 L AftE AREA TO ADD MEDIGAL OFFICE UPRIGHT JUNIPER 7 6 - 7' :�X 5•°•`,y� OTHERS O A[ oxAwwe O nAnwwuer 9�i, Ir05 orT,u, nAo o sxEraATaxttnr Shelburne 5quare ha. `� s rjO/OTFEK ]021 O'LEARY-BURKE THUJA 8 6' - 7 - ®' °•" `� South Burlington Vumoni DvK".M CIVIL ASSOCLATES, PLC Change of Use ���''''"''S%� TALI Site Plan 1 / 1 U l / l f Ma leS South Burlington Planning Zoning > New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees ° Project Completed by April 1, 2011 0 Project Name & Address 41 IDX Drive Property Owner Plaza Investments Effective Date TOTAL IMPACT FEE -$2, Value of New Construction: Type of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or Reinforced Concrete Masonry or Concrete SF Bearing SF Wall Structure Wood Frame Structure SF Pre -Fab Steel Structure SF industrial/Manufacturing S66 S69 S65 S64 Engineering & Research S88 S96 S93 S88 General Office S123 S113 silo S104 Medical Office S133 S71 S69 S67 General Retail S84 S54 S51 S41 Auto Service Facility 84 S81 S78 Elder Care Facility 102 S74 S72 S72 Motel Sprinkler credit? (Enter 1 if yes) Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Past payments credit: Post construction value of structure & land Future payments credit: Base fee: NET FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE: PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: ROAD IMPACT FEE: $3,823.68 $1.A6o..q8 �;0.001 $0 $0.0 $3,161,900 $2,118.47 $3,161,goo.00 $158.10 $0.00 -$2,276.57 04/18/2011 Cit_ of South Burlington Grand Li 12:55 pm Parcel Report For Parcel: 0915-00041. PLAZA INVESTMENTS Name PLAZA INVESTMENTS NEVILLE COMPANIES 30 KIMBALL AVE SUITE 101 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 Location 911 41 IDX DR Tax Map 51-040-000 Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)C Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Real Land Building Equipment Values: 3,161,900 1,390,400 1,771,500 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt 0 0.00 0 0.00 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 31,619.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 55469 Updated: 05/28/2009 Last sale was: Invalid on / / for $0 recorded on 0/0 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 150409000 (8) : N (9): 08/21/00 SPAN: 600-188-15030 Page 1 of 1 ray Total 0.00 Inventory 0 Land Use 0.00 Prev. Real 3,161,900 March 31, 2011 Re: #SP-11-13 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months If you have any questions, please contact me. kSincely,. B lair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com S� I ►+ south intrfington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-� I - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax -Ek es4,,ne 4S c7 4 p 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: In(2W I l b C) . C CY►'1 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: L, 1 �XI)E , �11\ �r ZLC) 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): O 1 � 5 - U)01-� 1 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): ( v �b b. fisting Uses on Property (inclu & escription and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): g j c' r' aftfu sip, VV d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of emplo_yees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Gu - Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form, Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 2,4, Go % 25, � Z,0 _sq. ft. Proposed 2,t j• (p % / Z$_sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / Proposed % / d. Total area to be' disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) Ju IA sq. ft. sq. ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ �ZI , GM b. Landscaping: $ N l i4 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: �( •;�� a U►/► L I 7 VVl 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: A n" I I �i � . .� GI 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). ' Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information reque ted as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN RE OF APPLICANT drAo SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board reAdministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: omplete // 1,1,7 ❑ I Administrative 0? Y/ ( Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 LOCATION PLAN NTS ONTAINERS tia EXISTING 6' BASKET WEAVE FENCE 6' SCREENING FENCE --- ------ - - - ----- ----- --`--- s_,--------------- ---- ---- _. - - EXISTING TRASH - CANS - - - . RASH ON CONCRETE PAD EXISTING DUMP5TERS T CONCRETE WALK 10 SPt / BOLLARD - TYPE LIGH77NG (TYPICAL) CONCRETE WALK �i lot � 1 EXISTING {j I�O i. SIGN w� 0. W 6 a J z I EXlS77NG SIDEWALK �+ 1 PLANT LIST KEY BOTANICAL NAME 0hj prrunus "h.i." II tilia cordato �Ap Dino .in orl nisnioraniara >.0— corpus mas aj junioerus chinen pr assorted perennials to include: -varieties astilbe, coreopsis: dianthus, delphinium, lupine, shosto daisy, phlox, white marrow, campanula »� jv junioerus virginiona to thuia occidentalis 1DX DRl VE C U Y v CONCRETE WALK S 15 SR 15 SP. MULCHED ISLAND ® TYP. �fj 11 SP. -- c 16 SP, BENCH SEAT ( c J �(TYPICAL) --- c !— bf ssCONSsCRE77�E WALKO itssis i a7 c c __ EXTRA 1Ggh�� �ryflHi �ii,y►� aR''f9. C wn�ri� '. �"+"'� q Jr OORA �"J t�j'}' ?2 SP. COMPACT CAR SPACES SP..-rt c c c ccc cc ccc e c ap � * � 7l ICNIC SPRUCE EXISTING SLOPE PLANTED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX — — — --- 500' FROM CENTERLINE o — ---- - OF SHELBURNE ROAD c) LEGEND it ut — PROPERTY LINE EXISTING LIGHT — — — CURB LINE WOOD FENCE Nn TE• - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - BUILDING SETBACK ORIGINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN BY F772PA7RICK - LLEWELLYN INC. COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE REMARKS PROJECT INFORMATION DRAWN NOV.. 1988, LAST REVISION DA7E "1-6-89" N07ED AS 1-6-88. holly joliyette 13 1 1/2 - 2" SITE 2_4 ACRES cherry linden 11 3' - 3 1/2" b&b PROVIDED: 147 PARKING SPACES (6 HANDICAP) little -leaf REQUIRED: 123 PARKING SPACES THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO UPDATE oustrian pine 14 7' - B" b&b THE USES ON THIS AND A SETBACK, SHELBURNE ROAD: 50 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE NOW STORAGE AREAAAND SHOWRCEL THE cornelian cherry53 18" - 24" c SETBACK, IDX DRIVE: 40 FEET b o LOCATION OF THE EXISTING BIKE RACK. THE SITE WAS FIELD CHECKED ON 10/4/05 AND SETBACK, 2 SIDE YARD: 15 FEET WAS UPDATED FROM A PREVIOUS SITE PLAN andorra juniper 257 1 gal c TO SHOW THE PARKING SPACES AND OTHER ( IN FEET 1 + man = zo it GENERAL AMENITIES AS SHOWN HEREON. perennials 200 - RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2011 ` �. wrr G �E x>+so" er °5 7 6' 7' �`` °'�.;'== - °r Shelburne Square -1 upright juniper - :t 5 Mo. *: ` PUO OTHERS O'LEARY-BLJRKE VrrnaM thuja 8 6' - 7' City of So. Burlington '% `' i Jj7 DW p� c1vlLassocla,lEs, PLC South Burlington Change of Use 2021-S, ' lart�,`�,� Site Plan 1 ( P NMI ll ..l"` southburlington PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM To: Kristy, Neville Companies From: Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer 7Y Re: Defective Dumpster Enclosure @ 41 IDX Dri e Date: April 29, 2008 I received a complaint from the owner of 25 Imperial Drive regarding trash being blown by the wind onto his property from 41 IDX Drive. He indicated that he has a wooded area behind his house which is adjacent to the dumpster storage area at 41 IDX Drive. Apparently, the enclosure does not do a good job of containing wind blown material. Would you please take a look at this dumpster enclosure to see what could be done to provide a more secure enclosure? Please note that Section 14.07(C) Disposal of Wastes of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations requires that dumpster enclosures be properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com j O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC CIVIL ENCjINI IRING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PRE PARAI ON LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION SLRVICFS LAND USE PLANNING December 7, 2005 Mr. Ernie Christianson Regional Engineer Agency of Natural Resources 1 1 1 West Street Essex Jct., VT 05452 RE: Sanitary Sewer Allocation for WW-4-0061-2 Shelburne Square, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT Dear Ernie: We are writing on behalf of Plaza Investments (c/o of Mery Brown) to verify that the above referenced project has sufficient sewer allocation to accommodate the recent change of use of a portion of Shelburne Square from office to a nail salon. The original permit WW-4-0061 was approved for 1,650 gallons of sewage per day. The permit was amended (WW-4-0061-2) to include a 75 seat restaurant which added 2,250 gal/day (75 seats x 30 gal/day/seat =2,250 gal/day) for a total of 3,900 gal/day. Lilydale's is no longer at Shelburne Square. The current uses on the property are as follows: Downstairs Talbots clothing store 100 gal/day Gadue's Dry Cleaning 100 gal/day Nail Salon - 3 pedicure stations x 4 gal/station/wash x 4 wash/hr maximum x 8 hours/day 384 gal/day - 1 hairwashing station 150 gal/day - 5 employees x 15 gal/employee 75 gal/day T.S. Peck Insurance 100 gal/day Vermont Sandwich - 30 seats x 30 gal/day/seat 900 gal/day Upstairs 11,750 sf x (1 employee/250 sf) = 47 employees - 47 employees x 15 gal/day/employee 705 gal/day 2,514 gal/day 1 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE # 1 ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452 TEL 802 878 9990 1 FAX 802 878 9989 obca@olearyburke.com Ernie Christianson December 7, 2005 Page 2 Based on the current State Regulations, the current uses require allocation for 2,514 gal/day as shown above. The site is permitted for 3,900 gal/day. There are some vacancies that could potentially raise the allocation figures closer to the allocated figure of 3,900 gal/day. This letter is for informational purposes only and we are not asking for any change in the permit. If you have any questions, feel free to call. Sincerely, Karl Marchessault, E.I. Enc. cc: Ray Belair (City of South Burlington, Zoning Administrator) Mery Brown Z:\2002\2021 \ER N I E-BELAI R.doc ,f4 e r ('':Ite of Vermont. -- Li Supply and Wastewater Disposal LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES — r hQp Mn LTA- A -nntil Chanter 4. Public B6J4-1,q4 r APPLICANT Plaza Investments Appendix A, Design Guidelines ADDRESS 200 Twin Oaks Terrace, Suite 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of amending Public Building Permit PB- 4-1501 to relocate the municipal sewer line and building sewers for a proposed office/retail building on Lot 11 approved in Subdivision Permit EC-4-1343, located at the intersection of U.S. Route 7 and Holmes Road Extension, in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not constitute Act 250 approval (Title V.S.A., Chapter 151). The permittee is hereby reminded to procure all relevant State and to( -al permits prior to proceeding with this project. (2) The project sha'.1 be completed as shown on the plans Project Number 8+124 Sheet 1 of 6 "Site & Utilities Plan" dated Nov. 1988; las': revised 12/22/88; Sheet 3 of 6 "Typical Details" dated Sept. 1988; and Sheet 5 of 6 "Typical Details" (for "Sewer Insulation Detail" only) dated Sept. 1988 prepared by CitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shad not deviate from the approved plans without prior witten approval from the Division of Protection. (3) All conditions sit forth in Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1343 dated November 1, 1988 shall remain in effect except as modified or amend:-d herein. (4) This permit shall supercede Public Building Permit #PB-4- 1501 dated Septemher 16, 1988, thereby rendering it null and void. (5) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (6) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and subject to'compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (7) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, and with this permit. WATER SUPPLY (8) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the proposed public water system subject to the jurisdiction of the Vermont Department of Health. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division--o=E Protection. The permittee shall forward a copy of the',,{'1� Health Department's acceptance letter of the compl'eteeh public water system to the Division of Protectiom,f'or � inclusion in the project file. J��0 I� . Plaza Invest•^•Ii WW-4-0061 Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (9) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington, Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 1650 gallons of sewage per day. (10) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Protection Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest p. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jc_.., Vermont this 10th day of Janudry, 1989. cc: Donald Robis.y City Planning Commission Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. PB-4-1501 EC-4-1343 j L9 t` J lam' L I,.-1`/ Li I N I (.y )State of Vermont N�1 t r Water Supply & Wastewater Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules CASE NO. WW-4-0061-2 Chapter 4, Public Buildings APPLICANT Plaza Investments ADDRESS 1350 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of utilizing two retail spaces within the building approved in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0061-1 for a 75 seat bakery (2 meals per day) located at 1350 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental '.commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) In the event of a transfer of ownership (Martial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall becc•me permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms end conditions of this permit.' (3) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses ?required by their Department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 804-863-7220). (4) All conditions set forth in Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit #WW-4-0061-1 dated February 16, 1989 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Timothy J. Burke, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By d��/6!�L� LLGd�- Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 5th day of July 1990. cc: Donald Robisky South Burlington City Planning Commission Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry WW-4-0061-1 Angelo Mariano (dba Lily Bakery, 1350 Shelburne Rd Shelburne, VT 05482) Impact Fee Calculation for New Non -Residential Construction li r A Project Name X B Effective Date Ob C Type of use D Type of construction E Value of construction per square foot from Appendix 1 F Total square feet of new construction Ar.W q .0 ffI44C P/6 VA G Total value of new construction /(/ E x F H I 1 K L Above in units of $1,000 G / 1000 Existing land value + ,�5,0,111 360 Grand list Above rn units of $1,000 ��► I / 1000 Total value of site and improvements after construction G + I Above in units of$1,000 K / 1000 ROAD IMPACT FEE M Base road impact fee per VTE N Estimated PM peak hour VTEs O Base road impact fee P Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-5) for past payments Q Credit for past payments R Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-6) for future payments S Credit for future payments T Total road impact fee $144.56 MxN xP ,xR -Q-S FIRE PROTECTION FEE Estimated post construction value of structure and contents U in units of $1,000 H x 1.875 V Base fire protection impact fee $0.87 x U Credit per $1,000 of land value G) for past tax payments W (Table FP4) From FP-4 X Total credit applicable to project for past tax payments W x J Post -construction value of structure and land excluding Y contents G + I Z Above m units of $1,000 Y / 1,000 Credit per $1,000 of post -construction value for future tax AA pints (Table FP-5) From FP-4 AB Total credit applicable to project for future tax payments AA x Z AC Total fire protection impact fee V - X - AB TOTAL ROAD AND FIRE IMPACT FEE Calculation sheets.xls Permit Number SP- 0-5 - r CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Mery Brown, 66 Kniaht Lane, Suite 30, Williston, VT 05495 (802) 764-1630 x205 fax (802) 764-1632 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page # 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Same as Owner 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Karl Marchessault, O'Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC, 1 Corporate Drive, Suite 1 Phone (802) 878-9990 fax (802) 878-9989 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 41 IDX Drive, South Burlinqton, VT 05403 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) (. ) `I / _5- ` C)©©Gf/ G 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Upstairs 11,750 sf (office), Talbots 6,292 sf, Gadue's 1,172 sf, T.S. Peck 3,166, VT Sandwich 1,410 sf, 1,930 sf vacant b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) The proposed use on the property will be a nail salon. The nail salon will occupy half the currently vacant space of 1,930 sf. Therefore, 965 sf will be personal service and 965 sf will be future office. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 30,000 square foot gross, outside dimension will differ from GLA (gross leasable area) of 25,720 sf d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Approximately 25 feet high, 2 story -building e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees):Each company has own employess, N/A, adequate parking, see cover letter g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N/A 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 105,640 Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 13.8 % / 14,600 sq. ft. Proposed 13.8 % / 14,600 sq. ft, b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 70.0 % / 74,000 sq. ft. Proposed 70.0 % / 74,000 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 39.5 % / 10,888/27,596 sq. ft. Proposed 39.5 0/oto,888/27,596sq, ft, d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) b) Landscaping: $ N/A $ N/A c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): None, N/A 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out); b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 57 c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 77 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 916 12:00 to 2:00 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Mon through Friday 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N/A 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) N/A 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN BRIE OF AP ICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board l;'Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ c of Planning & Zoning or Designee 4 r3 OCT-13-2005 09:0E AM 0 Ar=Y-BURKE CIVIL 9 9919 I 1 P.02 Areas are GLA (gross f®aeeble area)=25,720 Of as provided by Mery Brown 1015I01; Adjusted to Floor Area of building 29,425 sf on EgMrIX Conversion 29,425 / 25,720 sf = 1.14405132.2 Factor t E190r Converted Tenant Use GLA Floor Area Area Talbots POtites Clothing Store Retail 5,282 7,188 gf Cadue's Dry Cleaning Personal Service 1,172 1,341 sf Formerly H&R Block Office 1,$30 2 208 T-8. Peck Insurance Office 311613 22_ s Vermont Sandwich Short Order Restaurant 1A1,0 1W sf F{ID/O'�r 13,970 15,992 sf A��,yd Mpy Office 11,750 13,443 f eMt7dst—d Total Area 26,720 29,425 of Jet Flog Converted Tenant Use GLA Area Floor Area Talbots Patitas Clothing Store Retail 6,292 7,19$ sf Gadus's Dry Cleaning Personal Service 1,172 1,341 sf Nail Salon will take half, formery H&R Block personal Service Other half of formerly H&R block (Vacant) Office 985 1,104 of 965 1,104 sf T.S. Peck Insurance Office 3,166 3,622 sf Vermont sandwich Short Order Restaurant 1,410 1 "l Sf &&Flood 13,970 15,982 sf Multiple Offices Office 11,750 13,443 of Total Area 2a,720 29,425 sf S O Leary -Burke Civil Associates, PLC f4 0111+N CIVIL ENGINEERING I REGULATORY AND PERMIT PREPARATION I LAND SURVEYING I CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I LAND USE PLANNING October 4, 2005 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Shelburne Square, Change of Use Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT Dear Ray, We are writing on behalf of Mery Brown to provide you an updated site plan of the Shelburne Square commercial property just north of IDX Drive in South Burlington, VT. It is our understanding that this plan is required to change the use of one of the tenants on the parcel from office to personal service. A nail salon is proposing to occupy 950 sf of what was formerly office space. The salon will have a total of 7 treatment centers. The site plan shows the existing building, parking and associated amenities including benches, bike rack, landscaping, etc. The plan also shows a snow storage area on the southeast corner of the property where snow has been piled up in the past few years. Mery Brown indicated to us that during a heavy snow year, maybe 5 or so parking spaces have been taken up by the piled snow storage area. In order to satisfy the parking requirements, the following calculations were performed: Formerly 14,916 sf (office) x 3.5 spaces / 1000 sf = 52.2 1,172 sf (service) x 4.0 spaces / 1000 sf = 4.7 6,292 sf (retail) x 5.0 spaces / 1000 sf = 31.5 1,410 sf (short order restaurant) x 12 sp/1000sf = 16.9 1,930 sf (formerly office) x 3.5 spaces / 1000 sf = 6.8 25,720 sf (total) 112.2 = 113 spaces 1 CORPORATE DRIVE SUITE #1 ESSEX JUNCTION VERMONT 05452 TEL 802 878 9990 1 FAX 802 878 9989 1 obca@olearyburke.com Mr. Ray Belair Page 2 October 10, 2005 With Change of Use 14,916 sf (office) x 3.5 spaces / 1000 sf = 52.2 1,172 sf (service) x 4.0 spaces / 1000 sf = 4.7 6,292 sf (retail) x 5.0 spaces / 1000 sf = 31.5 1,410 sf (short order restaurant) x 12 sp/1000sf = 16.9 965 sf (formerly office) x 3.5 spaces / 1000 sf = 3.4 now vacant 965 sf (personal service) 7 TC* x 2 spaces / TC=14.0 24,218 sf (total) 122.7 = 123 spaces *TC (treatment center or necessary chair for the proposed nail salon) There are 147 actual spaces on -site. Therefore even if 10 spaces were used as snow storage in the southeast corner parking area, 137 spaces would remain. Based on the site visit today, it appears that the existing parking spaces are sufficient as approximately half of the spaces were empty. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Gad 4���Lc Karl Marchessault, E.I. Enc. cc: Mery Brown Z A2002\202I \BELAIR 100405.doc Breakdown of Uses for Shelburne Square Project Areas are GLA (gross leasable area) as provided by Mery Brown on 10/5/05 Formerly 1st Floor Tenant Use Area Talbots Petites Clothing Store Retail 6,292 sf Gadue's Dry Cleaning Personal Service 1,172 sf Formerly H&R Block Office 1,930 sf T.S. Peck Insurance Office 3,166 sf Vermont Sandwich Short Order Restaurant 1,410 sf 13,970 sf 2nd Floor Multiple Offices Office 11,750 sf Total Area 25,720 sf Proposed 1st Floor Tenant Use Area Talbots Petites Clothing Store Retail 6,292 sf Gadue's Dry Cleaning Personal Service 1,172 sf Nail Salon will take half, formery H&R Block Personal Service 965 sf Other half of formerly H&R block (Vacant) Office 965 sf T.S. Peck Insurance Office 3,166 sf Vermont Sandwich Short Order Restaurant 1,410 sf 13,970 sf 2nd Floor Multiple Offices Office 11,750 sf Total Area 25,720 sf General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 78 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 199 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 11.01 3.58 - 28.80 6.13 Udtd r1UL d11U Cyuc1L1U11 U) 73 c w a H N U_ L Q1 a> ro a� Q j 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 n '• -// Us X................ .... ---------- ... .... .... ........ .... ... .r'.... ---- �.. ........... ... .... .... .... ...X. .... ._.. ... ..._ .. .... .... ..... / . ... ... ... .... .... .... r��. .... .... .... .... _.. ... ... .... _... .. ... .... .... .... . .. . --- aXC.... X X .._...... •-•. .... .... : .... : '�X , . ..X.. ... •.X . - .--- •--- .-•- -•-- ... , .. XX ,�' ,XX X , XXC X .x _. x ........... .. :.__.... ;... :.. X XX X=---- - ----------- --- -------------•----------- XX 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.768 Ln(X) + 3.654 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.80 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1052 Institute of Transportation Engineers 1 � General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 216 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 223 Directional Distribution: 88% entering, 12% exiting Trigs Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.56 0.60 - 5.98 1.40 uata Niot and hauation wl 4,000 3,000 1,C00 0 0 / 705,.Y ---------------------------------------------- -'--------------- X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . . . . - - - . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . - . . - X �X X X... X------------------• X XXX/ X X XX X XN XX X XXX X X Actual Data Points 1000 2000 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.797 Ln(X) + 1.558 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.83 3000 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1053 Institute of Transportation Engineers I I General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 234 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 216 Directional Distribution: 17% entering, 83% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.49 0.49 - 6.39 1.37 Data Plot and Equation y C W a I� 4,000 3,000 1,000 0 0 X Actual Data Points 1000 2000 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 1.121(X) + 79.295 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.82 3000 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1054 Institute of Transportation Engineers High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (832) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 12 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 7 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting i rip veneration per 1000 5q. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 130.34 73.51 - 246.00 43.77 Data Plot and Equation 1,500 1,400 1,300 1,200 c W a H 1,100 d U L > 1,000 a> rn cC 900 Q I I ~ 800 700 600 500 237s. .13c�,s'y= BYO ..-...... ..---- . -- /<" k ------------------ ------------------ .. . ............ '--- -- '....... ...... ......... ......... X ---- X X ....... -- .... X..... ....... ....... ---- _ - -- ------- X X X-----•------- •--------- --- ------- ----- ..... X 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given . R2 = **** Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1376 Institute of Transportation Engineers High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant �832) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studie.-: 22 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 6 Directional Distributioi 52% entering, 48% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.27 0.53 - 25.60 7.46 Data Plot and Equation 130 120 110 100 90 c Lu 80 F- a� L 70 s a> 60 m 0 Q 50 I I ~ 40 30 20 10 0 X .� 17;27 . - ;----- ..... ............:......X.,........; X ; . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . - - - X ............... ..... ....... X....---- ---- -••--- X.......:........ .......:x ----...--- ;..- x X ;.X..... •----- .X- ...... ...... --- X...-. ............................. •X ---. ----- ----- -•-- - t...... X... ...... ...... ..... ..... ---- ...X X X 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given ------ Average Rate R2 = .... Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1377 Institute of Transportation Engineers I ) High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (832) K Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 34 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 6 Directional Distribution: 60% entering, 40% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 10.86 2.80 - 62.00 9.83 Data Plot and Equation z 22c 21C 20C 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 23,75- x•... .. ' ---• ... ..--- ---- X- . .. _ . .... .... ............. .... ..... .... .... _ ... . .. ...:...... ......:. . ....X...... _.. _ _.. _... .. x. .... ; _ . ............. .... x.. ..._. .;�.. ....... .... _... ..... ;..•• •-- ..y .y, .k: ; ...................... .... ..... : .... ..... .... X. .... ... X. .... 7G .. - - • --. ... _ . ..... .... _ X --X... ............ \X..... ..... ..... ..... 2 3 4 5 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: Not given Trip Generation, 6th Edition 6 7 8 9 10 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area 11 12 13 14 ----- Average Rate R2 = **** 1378 Institute of Transportation Engineers W,eeL) Land Use: 870 Apparel Store Independent Variables with One Observation The following trip generation data are for independent variables with only one observation. This information is shown in this table only; there are no related plots for these data. Users are cautioned to use these data with care because of the small sample size. Trip Size of Number Generation Independent of Independent Variable Rate Variable Studies Directional Distribution 1.000 Sanare FPat (:rncc Gl^— A..,.. Weekday 66.40 5 1 50% entering, 50% exiting A.M. Peak Hour of 1.00 5 1 80% entering, 20% exiting Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Peak Hour of Generator 4.80 5 1 54% entering, 46% exiting 'T., /4.d ' 6za Z 62S Z _ /0,0 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1610 Institute of Transportation Engineers r Apparel Store (870) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 5 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.83 1.50 - 6.80 . 2.81 Data Plot and Equation 60 50 10 66 Z x 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X Actual Data Points X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 1.448 Ln(X) + 0.438 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.69 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1611 Institute of Transportation Engineers City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Paul O'Leary Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Site Modifications, 1350 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. O'Leary: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 1996. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S cere y, J e Weith, C ty Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Mery Brown City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1996 Paul O'Leary Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Site Modifications, 1350 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. O'Leary: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the October 22, 1996 Planing Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cer ly, Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Mery Brown PLANNING COMMISSION 22 October 1996 page 3 is to be merged with 1.1 acres for the 2.22 acre parcel. Mr. Weith said they will have to record a survey of the new property. Mr. Dinklage asked if all the land is in the same zone. Mr. Llewellyn said it is. Mr. Weith noted the land being acquired is very steep and he asked why they are acquiring it. Mr. Ayer said only part of it is steep. To the east it is very beautiful. No issues were raised, and Mr. Weith said they can go right to final plat. 6. Site plan application of Plaza Investments to amend a previously approved site plan for a 29,425 sq. ft. office and retail building. The amendment consists of 1) converting 3 parking spaces to a trash storage area, and 2) replacing landscaping along the easterly boundary with a different variety of plant material, 1342 Shelburne Rd: Mr. O'Leary said this is the Shelburne Square development which was originally approved in December, 1988. 152 parking spaces were required. 151 were built. He showed the original location of the dumpster. A concrete pad has been built on one parking space, and the dumpsters will occupy that plus 2 other spaces, leaving 148 usable parking spaces. The calculations, taking into account shared parking, show a need for 147 spaces. They propose to enclose the dumpsters in this location. With regard to landscaping, there were orginally Austrian pines planted. These were later stolen (as confirmed by neighbors). The applicant proposes to replace these with other, less at- tractive, species. No issues were raised. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission a2prove the site plan ap- plication of Plaza Investments to amend a previously approved site plan for a 29,425 sq. ft. office and retail building. The amendment consists of: 1) converting three parking spaces to a trash storage area, and 2) re2lacing landscaping along the easterly boundary with a different variety of plant material, 1342 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled "Shelburne Square City of South Burlington, VT," prepared by Lamoureux. Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 6/10/96, last_ revised 10/4/96, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- PLANNING COMMISSION October 22, 1996 Page 4 seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 The Planning Commission approves a total of 148 parking spaces. This represents a four space or 2.6% shortfall. 3 The applicant shall remove the compact car space signs located along the easterly row of parking spaces and place them along the row of spaces adjacent to the easterly side of the building as shown on the plan. 4 The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The plan shall be revised to accurately depict the location of the Cl and R4 District boundary which is located 500 feet from the centerline of Shelburne Road. b) The plan shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed plantings to equal the value of the plantings being replaced. 5 Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $3,360 landscape bond_ . The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6 The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 7 The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the revised site layout. 8 Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Ms. Barone seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Site plan application of Kenneth Smith to amend a previously approved site plan for a 25,000 square foot building for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses for 10 tenants. The amendment consists of: 1) adding additional permitted and conditional uses to the list of uses allowed in the building, and 2) adding 10,000 square feet of second floor space for a total gross floor area of 35,000 square feet, 49 Commerce Avenue. ,�MOUREUX, STONE & O'LEAt% Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont05452 November 5, 1996 Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Shelburne Square Dear Ray, (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 As requested, please find attached three copies of the revised Shelburne Square plan depicting the location of the Cl and R4 zoning boundary and with an increase in the number of proposed upright junipers and thujas from 10 each to 14 each. The number of plantings were increased to equal the value of the plantings being replaced. iSin cerr , Paul O'Leary Jr., P.E. Enc. cc: Mery Brown, Plaza Investments W APAUL\96076-3. PJ0 Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Hydrogeological Investigation • Planning • Land Surveying 10/22/96 MOTION OF APPROVAL PLAZA INVESTMENTS I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Plaza Investments to amend a previously approved site plan for a 29,425 square foot office and retail building. The amendment consists of: 1) converting three (3) parking spaces to a trash storage area, and 2) replacing landscaping along the easterly boundary with a different variety of plant material, 1342 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a plan entitled, "Shelburne Square City of South Burlington, VT," prepared by Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 6/10/96, last revised 10/4/96, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Planning Commission approves a total of 148 parking spaces. This represents a four (4) space or 2.6% shortfall. 3. The applicant shall remove the compact car space signs located along the easterly row of parking spaces and place them along the row of spaces adjacent to the easterly side of the building as shown on the plan. 4. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The plan shall be revised to accurately depict the location of the Cl and R4 District boundary which is located 500 feet from the centerline of Shelburne Road. b) The plan shall be revised to increase the size of the proposed plantings to equal the value of the plantings being replaced. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $3360 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 6. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 1 7. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the revised site layout. 8. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 2 Memorandum - Planning October 22, 1996 agenda items October 18, 1996 Page 2 5) BERARD, AYER - BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of the subdivision of an undeveloped 41 acre parcel (lot #1) into two (2) parcels of 1.28 acres and 39.72 acres. The 1.28 acre parcel is to be merged with an adjoining parcel of 0.92 acres to create a new parcel of 2.22 acres. This property located on Berard Drive lies within the IC, CO and Floodplain Overlay Districts. It is bounded on the north by the Winooski River, on the east by undeveloped land, on the south by commercial and industrial buildings along Berard Drive, and on the west by Berard Drive. Lot size/frontage: Lot size requirement of 40,000 square feet will be met. The 1.28 are parcel will be merged with the existing 0.92 acre parcel at 4 Berard Drive to create a new lot of 2.22 acres. Frontage requirement will be met. Coverage/setbacks: Coverages on the 4 Berard Drive parcel will be reduced and the coverages on the remaining 39.72 acre parcel will remain unchanged. Setback requirements are met. 6) PLAZA INVESTMENTS - PARKING & LANDSCAPING MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 29,425 square foot office and retail building. The amendment consists of: 1) converting three (3) parking spaces to a trash storage area, and 2) replacing landscaping along the easterly boundary with a different variety of plant material. This project was originally approved on 12/20/88 (minutes enclosed). The only issues affected by this amendment are parking and landscaping. This property located at 1342 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl and R4 Districts. It is bounded on the north by the proposed Pizzeria Uno restaurant and a single family residence, on the east by undeveloped property, on the south by Holmes Road Extension, and on the west by Shelburne Road. 2 Memorandum - Planning October 22, 1996 agenda items October 18, 1996 Page 3 V'\ Parking: A total of 152 spaces are required and 148 spaces are 1 being provided including four (4) handicapped spaces. This represents a four (4) space or 2.6% shortfall. The applicant has conducted a shared parking analysis (see enclosed) which indicates that only 147 spaces are needed. The original approval included 37 compact car spaces. The proposedy2 plan shows 35 compact car spaces. The compact car spaces signsl located along the easterly row of spaces should be removed and placed along the row of spaces facing the easterly side of the building as shown on the plan. Landscaping: The applicant has indicated that the 12 Austrian Pine trees planted along the easterly boundary were stolen. These trees have an estimated value of $3360. The applicant proposes to replace these lost trees with upright Juniper and Thuja shrubs. These shrubs have an estimated value of $2550 which is $810 short of the Austrian Pines which they replace. Staff recommends that the size of the proposed plantings be increased to equal the value of the plantings being replaced. Other: --- plan should be revised to accurately depict the location of the Cl and R4 District boundary located 500 feet from the centerline of Shelburne Road. 7) KENNETH SMITH - ADDITIONAL USES - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 25,000 square foot building for a multiple of commercial and industrial uses for 10 tenants. The amendment consist of: 1) adding additional permitted and conditional uses to the list of uses allowed in the building, and 2) adding 10,000 square feet of second floor space for a total gross floor area of 35,000 square feet. The ZBA on 9/23/96 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the proposed uses. The Planning Commission approved the building on 6/13/95 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 49 Commerce CO Districts. It is bounded on the lots, on the south by undeveloped Commerce Avenue. 3 Avenue lies within the IC and east and west by undeveloped property and on the north by If EN SITE PLAN ESCROW AG.REEMEI�7T THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between MFRV RROWN , hereinafter referred to as Developer", the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the hereinafter referred to as "Bank". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Planning Commission for the development of property lot;ated at 1342 Shp1hurnp and as depicted on a site plan entitled " Shelburne Square City of S.Burl.", dated 6/10/96 and revised 10/4/96, and prepared by Lamoureaux Stone and O'Leary, Inc. WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: 1,-) > & Replacement of landscaping on easterly boundary of 1442"Shelburne Rd. 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hereinabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit for as above , Developer and Bank agree that the sum of $3,360.00 shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and shall be available for payment to the Municipality in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in this Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality, nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically . 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 10. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this Agreement. 11. This Agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . 12. The sum of $ 3 , 360.00 shall be maintained in escrow until k b certification to the Bany the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3) . 2 13. This Agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at �� e) uv ( (f' 4Q , V i u� this day of J� MERV BROWN ZJX�9, J 4itne " _� By: Z'Lel-- Witness Duly Authorized Agent Dated at this day of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Witness By: Witness Duly Autho zed Ag iank Dated at this day of 199 - ( KEY BANK, National Association) Witmw �i�.. Witness 3 Shared Parking Calculations Project #: 96076 Shelburne Square Date.- 6/11/96 By: G.Lewis (GORDAN\SHARPARK WB1) Required Bldg Floor Area Peak Floor per parking Parking Use of Bldg Area Space Spaces Floor Area (s.f.) (s.f.) Required Office 14785 250 59 Retail 13881 150 93 Business Hours Parking Spaces Required (Office) % Parking Spaces Occupied (Office) JVof-P-awk-ing Spaces Occupied (Office) Parking Spaces Required (Retail) % Parking Spaces Occupied (Retail) # of Parking Spaces Occupied (Office) I otal Parking Spaces Needed 6:00 a.m. 59 3 2 93 0 0 2 TOO a.m. 59 20 12 93 8 7 19 8:00 a.m. 59 63 37 93 18 17 54 9:00 a.m. 59 93 55 93 42 39 94 10: 00 a.m. 59 100 59 93 68 63 122 11 -.00 a.m. 59 100 59 93 87 81 140 12:00 noon 59 90 53 93 97 90 143 1:00 P.M. 59 90 53 93 100 93 146 2:00 p.m. 59 97 57 93 97 90 147 3.00 p.m. 59 93 55 93 95 88 143 4:00 p.m. 59 77 45 93 87 81 126 5:00 p.m. 59 47 28 93 79 73 101 6:00 P.M. 59 23 14 93 82 76 90 7:00 p.m. 59 7 4 93 89 83 87 8:00 P.M. 59 7 4 93 87 81 85 9:00 P.M. 59 3 2 93 61 57 59 10:00 P.M 59 3 2 93 32 30 32 11 -.00 P.M. 59 0 0 93 13 12 12 12-00 mid. 59 0 0 93 0 0 0 Maximum parking spaces needed = 147 LIOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors 14 Morse Drive (802) 878-4450 Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Fax (802) 878-3135 August 20, 1996 Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Shelburne Square w Dear Ray, /mot y.�ad Please find attached a site plan application amendment, a site plan amendment fee of $30.00, and five copies of a drawing depicting the existing landscaping, parking lot layout and refuse locations for the Shelburne Square shopping center on Shelburne Road in South Burlington. Currently, the shopping center tenants are utilizing three of the parking spaces at the northeast corner of the parking lot for additional dumpster space. The additional dumpster space is not screened. The owner, Plaza Investments, wishes to amend its approval to allow for the continued use of two of the three spaces for additional dumpsters. As discussed on the phone, we have examined the impact the loss of the three spaces would have on the project. The project, as approved, consists of 14,785 sf of general office space and 13,881 sf of retail space. The current South Burlington regulations require one parking space per 250 sf of office space (14,785/250 9 spaces) and one parking space per 150 sf of retail space (13,881/150 = 93 spaces) for a total of spaces. The loss of the three spaces would reduce the available number of spaces to 146, three less than required. Since the project involves two separate uses, retail space and office space, it is not uncommon to allow for shared parking. Shared parking recognizes that different uses have peak parking requirements at different times during the day. The shared parking calculations were performed as outlined by the Urban Land Institute. Excerpts from that publication along with the calculations have been included for your review. The shared parking calculations indicate that the peak number of parking spaces required is 147 spaces. Therefore, Plaza Investments is proposing to continue to use two of the existing parking spaces for additional dumpster space. The additional spaces will be enclosed with a 6' tall basket weave style screening fence that will match the existing fence along the northern property line. The cost of the new dumpster area screening fence has been estimated at $1,500. The available number of parking spaces will be reduced from 149 spaces to 147 spaces. Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Hydrogeological Investigation • Planning • Land Surveying Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant Planner July 23, 1996 Page 2 Plaza Investments would also like to amend the previously approved landscaping plan. The original plan showed a row of Austrian pines along the eastern boundary of the project. Unfortunately, Austrian pines make excellent Christmas trees and the trees were removed by some unknown individual(s) prior to last Christmas. Since the eastern side abuts an existing wooded area, we are proposing to replace the Austrian pines with a mix of juniper and thuja which will be approximately 6' to 7' in height. The cost of the proposed landscaping has been estimated at $2,000. Each of the five enclosed landscaping plans reflects the proposed changes. Sincerely, Paul O'Leary Jr., P. E Enc. cc: Mery Brown, Plaza Investments W:\PAUL\96076-1.PJ0 L, .�4OUREUX, STONE & O'LEAk Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont05452 July 23, 1996 Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Shelburne Square Dear Ray, (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 Please find attached a drawing depicting the existing landscaping, parking lot layout and refuse locations for the Shelburne Square shopping center on Shelburne Road in South Burlington. Currently, the shopping center tenants are utilizing three of the parking spaces at the northeast corner of the parking lot for additional dumpster space. The additional dumpster space is not screened. The owner, Plaza Investments, wishes to amend its approval to allow for the continued use of two of the three spaces for additional dumpsters. As discussed on the phone, we have examined the impact the loss of the three spaces would have on the project. The project, as approved, consists of 14,785 sf of general office space and 13,881 sf of retail space. The current South Burlington regulations require one parking space per 250 sf of office space (14,785/250 = 59 spaces) and one parking space per 150 sf of retail space (13,881/150 = 93 spaces) for a total of 149 spaces. The loss of the three spaces would reduce the available number of spaces to 146, three less than required. Since the project involves two separate uses, retail space and office space, it is not uncommon to allow for shared parking. Shared parking recognizes that different uses have peak parking requirements at different times during the day. The shared parking calculations were performed as outlined by the Urban Land Institute. Excerpts from that publication along with the calculations have been included for your review. The shared parking calculations indicate that the peak number of parking spaces required is 147 spaces. Therefore, Plaza Investments is proposing to continue to use two of the existing parking spaces for additional dumpster space. The additional spaces would be enclosed with a 6' tall basket weave style fence to match the existing fence along the northern property line. The available number of parking spaces would be reduced from 149 spaces to 147 spaces. Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Hydrogeological Investigation • Planning • Land Surveying Mr. Ray Belair, Assistant Planner July 23, 1996 Page 2 Plaza Investments would also like to amend the previously approved landscaping plan. The original plan showed a row of Austrian Pines along the eastern boundary of the project. Unfortunately, Austrian Pines make excellent Christmas trees and the trees were removed by some unknown individual(s) prior to last Christmas. Since the eastern side abuts an existing wooded area, we are proposing to replace the Austrian Pines with a mix of juniper and thuja shrubbery. The proposed planting would be approximately 6' to 7' in height. The enclosed landscaping plan reflects the proposed changes. Sincerely, Paul O'Leary Jr., Enc. cc: Mery Brown, Plaza Investments W:\PAUL\96076-1.PJO t WAIOUREUX & STONE, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JCT., Vi 05452 -- t A STUDY CONDUCTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF ULI-THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE BY BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ABOUT ULI-THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE ULI—the Urban Land Institute is an independent, nonprofit research and educational organization incorporated in 1936 to improve the quality and standards of land use and development. The Institute is committed to conducting practi- cal research in the various fields of real estate knowledge; identifying and interpreting land use trends in relation to the changing economic, social, and civic needs of the people; and disseminating pertinent information leading to the orderly and more efficient use and development of land. ULI receives its financial support from member- ship dues, sale of publications, and contributions for research and panel services. Ronald R. Rumbaugh Executive Vice President ULI PROJECT STAFF Senior Director, Publications .. Frank H. Spink, Jr. Project Manager ............... John A. Casazza Editor ..................... Barbara M. Fishel Staff Vice President, Operations ................. Robert L. Helms Production Manager ......... Regina P. Agricola Art Director .............. Melinda A. Bremmer Artist ............... M. Elizabeth Van Buskirk Artist ................ Christopher J. Dominiski STUDY CONSULTANTS Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Project Coordinators ......................... Richard J. Hocking, Vice President Neil S. Kenig, Vice President John R. Wroble, Associate Recommended bibliographic listing: ULI—the Urban Land Institute, Shared Parking. Washington, D.C.: ULI—the Urban Land Institute, 1983. ='1983 by ULI—the Urban Land Institute Second Printing 1984, Third Printing 1987, Fourth Printing 1990. All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited. International Standard Book Number .......... 0-87420-652-9 Library of Congress Card Catalog Number .......... 83-51648 ULI Catalog Number S22 Printed in the United States of America ULI—the Urban Land Institute 625 Indiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-2930 Photographs: Mark S. Smith FOREWORD ADVISORY COMMITTEE he need for a study of the shared parking phe- W. Scott Toombs nomenon developed within ULI's Urban Develop- Committee Chairman ment/Mixed-Use Council in 1981. The council's Partner interest in shared parking was based on prelimi- Toombs Development Company nary observations at mixed-use/multiuse develop- New Canaan, Connecticut ments indicating that combinations of land uses require less parking space than the same land uses in free- Joseph C. Canizaro standing locations. The council also recognized that if Chief Executive Officer in fact shared parking is a widespread phenomenon, Joseph C. Canizaro Interests then most of the existing zoning regulations based on New Orleans, Louisiana single -use parking demand would be inappropriate for mixed-use/multiuse developments and would result in Monroe Carell excessive parking requirements for such projects. President This study of shared parking was therefore intended Central Parking System first to document the existence of shared parking and Nashville, Tennessee second to develop a methodology that can be used to estimate parking demand for mixed-use/multiuse George A. Devlin developments. President In September 1981, ULI's Executive Committee au- National Planning, Inc. thorized the initiation of a special fund-raising effort Livonia, Michigan for the study. This effort, which was spearheaded by Donald Zuchelli, then chairman of the Urban Develop- John M. Duncum ment/Mixed-Use Council, involved the active par president ticipation of members of several ULI councils in ob- Properties, Inc. taining contributions from 87 individuals and firms. H ouston, Houston, Texas Also in September 1981, an advisory committee of ULI Paul Egan members was formed; that committee selected Barton- Real Estate Department Aschman Associates to undertake the study. Follow- Prudential Insurance Company ing the successful completion of fund raising, the Newark, New Jersey study was initiated in June 1982. Throughout the study, Barton-Aschman worked closely with both the Richard Fleming ULI staff and the advisory committee, chaired by Scott The Denver Partnership, Inc. Toombs. This publication represents the findings and recom- Denver, Colorado mendations of the consultant's comprehensive study. Rene Gautschi The results clearly indicate the existence of shared Director of Planning and Design parking in mixed-use/multiuse developments and pro- Marriott Corporation vide a step-by-step methodology for estimating shared Washington, D.C. parking demand. Through the publication and dis- semination of the study's findings and recommenda- Eugene Geritz tions, it is hoped that the concept of shared parking Partner will gain widespread recognition and acceptance by Geritz Group local governments, developers, and lenders —thereby Del Mar, California enabling the more efficient planning and development of mixed-use/multiuse projects. Thomas Kobus John A. Casazza Executive Vice President Associate National Parking Association ULI Project Manager, Shared Parking Study Washington, D.C. hared parking is defined as parking space that canbe used to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The opportunity to implement shared park- ing is the result of two conditions: ■ Variations in the peak accumulation of parked vehi- cles as the result of different activity patterns of adjacent or nearby land uses (by hour, by day, by season); ■ Relationships among land use activities that result in peoples' attraction to two or more land uses on a single auto trip to a given area or development. BACKGROUND Shared parking is not a new phenomenon. It has long been observed in central business districts, sub- urban communities, and other areas where land uses are combined. While developers and public officials recognize the existence of shared parking, typical zon- ing codes do not provide for it.' Instead, most zoning codes are expressed in terms of peak parking indices or ratios for major types of individual land uses. While the peak ratios reflect the differences in parking de- mand generated by separate land uses and under cer tain conditions, they do not reflect the fact that total or combined peak parking demand can be significantly less than the sum of the individual demand values. That is, parking requirements may be overstated if they require space for the peak parking accumulations of each individual land use. Realistically, the peak parking accumulations for individual land uses in a mixed —land use development can occur at different times. It usually occurs by hour of day, but it is also 'See Appendix A for the results of a telephone survey of public agencies concerning the provisions for parking in their zoning codes. z 3 significant by day of week or season. Further, the proximity of the land uses encourages multiple - purpose trips in which people attracted to a multiuse development visit more than one land use. For people using an auto to travel to such developments, a single parking space can be used to serve several land uses. The significance of shared parking is connected to the emergence of mixed -use developments. Mixed -use developments are defined as developments having: ■ Three or more significant revenue -producing land uses; ■ Significant functional and physical integration of project components (including continuous pedestri- an connections); ■ A coherent development plan specifying project phasing, scheduling, land use densities, and other characteristics.2 In recent years, many mixed -use projects have been successful as catalysts for urban redevelopment and are viewed as unique and interesting places in which to work, visit, or live. To increase revenue and promote a lively atmosphere, mixed -use developments are fre- quently planned to incorporate land use activities that extend daytime activity periods into evening. Combin- ing land uses has a number of advantages, including the opportunity to take advantage of a captive market, certain economies of scale, and cost savings associ- ated with the reduced amount of space required. 2R.E. Witherspoon, J.P. Abbett, and R.M. Gladstone, MLred-Use Developments: New Ways of Land Use (Washington, D.C.: ULI—the Urban Land Institute, 1976). p5` 4 t &13 v 0 , F The emergence of mixed -use/ multiuse developments underscores the need to plan for shared parking. OBJECTIVE Of THE STUDY While shared parking is commonly observed in a number of specific cases, very little literature formally documents the circumstances of shared parking or provides guidelines for quantifying its extent. No ac- cepted method is available for predicting and quantify- ing opportunities for shared parking under a wide range of possible conditions. The research undertaken for this study was thus intended to: ■ Identify the primary independent variables affecting parking demand in shared parking situations (that is, for developments involving two or more land uses) ; ■ Identify the relative effects and universality of those variables; ■ Develop a standard methodology for analyzing shared parking. 14 t 5d M1 ti EXHIBIT 27 REPRESENTATIVE MONTHLY VARIATIONS AS PERCENTAGE OF PEAK MONTH Hotel Hotel Rooms Rooms Hotel Hotel Month Office Retail Restaurant Cinema Residential Weekday Saturday Conference Convention January 100% 65% 80% 90% 100% 90% 65% 100% 20% February 100 65 75 70 100 90 70 100 40 March 100 70 90 50 100 95 80 100 80 April 100 70 90 70 100 95 85 100 80 May 100 70 95 70 100 95 85 100 100 June 100 75 100 100 100 100 90 100 100 July 100 75 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 August 100 75 85 70 100 100 100 100 50 September 100 75 80 80 100 95 90 100 70 October 100 75 80 70 100 95 90 100 70 November 100 80 80 50 100 85 80 100 40 December 100 100 90 50 100 85 65 100 20 parking factor is then adjusted to the same month. For example, if December is selected as the design month for a mixed -use project, the retail factor would be the normal peak, but the hotel factor would be factored to a value less than its seasonal peak. Adjustment for Mode of 7Yansportation Used. Just as the parking demand factors must be adjusted to the same season, they must also be adjusted to reflect the mode of transportation used. The recommended ap- proach is a twofold change. First, available peak park- ing demand factors are adjusted upward to reflect 100 percent auto use. Second, these parking factors for 100 percent auto use are adjusted downward to reflect the expected conditions at the development project being analyzed. For the typical suburban project where transit is not available, the second modification is not needed. However, for downtown projects in ur- ban areas where transit may be used for 10 to 60 percent of the trips, this correction is significant. The source for data about transportation modes may be specific transportation surveys or transporta- tion data available from planning studies for the urban area. The latter choice requires an assessment of the information's applicability to a specific site. Adjustment for Captive Market. This adjustment is optional because the effects of a captive market are difficult to identify. Without this adjustment, the de- mand estimate for shared parking would probably be too conservative. The existence of the captive patron relationship is identified by surveys of employees, visitors, and pa- trons as well as by parking surveys. Captive markets could be large enough to significantly lower parking demand. The data might indicate a widely ranging relationship that may not be predictable, however. They might be analyzed in a "what if" sense to test the possible impacts. Assuming a representative value of captive market support could reduce parking factors for retail or entertainment uses. An alternative would be to undertake a specific market analysis. This analy- sis would include a site -specific assessment of the potential for captive market support. STEP 3: ANALYSIS Of HOURLY ACCUMULATION This step produces an estimate of hourly parking accumulations for each land use during a typical weekday or weekend day (Saturday). The results of this step identify the shape of hourly accumulation curves for five basic land uses. The curves were rea- sonably consistent for a wide range of surveyed sites 46 EXHIBIT 28 REPRESENTATIVE HOURLY ACCUMULATION BY PERCENTAGE OF PEAK HOUR Hotel Residential Redden. Gf6ce Retail Restaurant Cinema (non-CBD) tial (CBD( Guest Room Restaurant/Lounge Conference Room Conven- lion Area Hour of Day Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Daily Weekday Saturday Daily Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Daily Daily 6:00 a.m. 3% — — — — — — 100% 100%t 100% 100% 90% 20% 20% — — 7:00 a.m. 20 20% 8% 3% 2% 2% — 87 95 95 85 70 20 20 — — 8:00 a.m. 63 60 18 10 5 3 — 79 88 90 65 60 20 20 50% 50% 9:00 a.m. 93 80 42 30 10 6 — 73 81 87 55 so 20 20 100 100 10:00 a.m. 100 80 68 45 20 8 — 68 74 85 45 40 20 20 100 100 11:00 a.m. 100 100 87 73 30 10 — 59 71 85 35 35 30 30 100 100 12:00 Noon 90 100 97 85 50 30 30% 60 71 85 30 30 50 30 100 100 1:00 P.M. 90 80 100 95 70 45 70 59 70 85 30 30 70 45 100 100 2:00 p.m. 97 60 97 100 60 45 70- 60 71 85 35 35 60 45 100 100 3:00 p.m. 93 40 95 100 60 45 70 61 73 85 35 40 55 45 100 100 4:00 p.m. 77 40 87 90 50 45 70 66 75 87 45 50 50 45 100 100 5:00 P.M. 47 20 79 75 70 60 70 77 81 90 60 60 70 60 100 100 6:00 p.m. 23 20 82 65 90 90 80 85 85 92 70 70 90 90 100 100 7:00 p.m. 7 20 89 60 100 95 90 94 87 94 75 80 100 95 100 100 8:00 p.m. 7 20 87 55 100 100 100 96 92 96 90 90 100 100 100 100 9:00 p.m. 3 — 61 40 100 100 100 98 95 98 95 95 100 100 100 100 10:00 P.M. 3 — 32 38 90 95 100 99 96 99 100 100 90 95 50 50 11:00 p.m. — — 13 13 70 85 80 100 98 100 100 100 70 85 — — 12:00 Mid- — — — — 50 70 70 100 100 100 100 100 50 70 — — night involving office, regional retail, and residential facili- ties (see exhibit 28). Nonroom-related hotel activities and entertainment uses varied significantly, however. If site -specific data are not available for these two land uses, survey results could be used. Accumulation curves are then estimated for each land use, based on the selected hourly values de- scribed in terms of the percent of maximum design -day parking demand expected at every hour during the day. The parking demand factor (step 2) multiplied by quantity of land use (step 1) produces an estimate of peak parking demand. This value multiplied by each hourly percentage produces an estimate of parking demand for every land use component by hour of day. STEP 4: ESTIMATE OF SNARED PARKING The hourly parking demand for each land use is merged to estimate overall shared parking demand for a proposed project. This step is simply the hour -by - hour addition of parking demand for each use to esti- mate the aggregate accumulation. As noted previously, the method described above should be used for week- day and Saturday conditions to test for the controlling value. SAMPLE USE OF THE METHODOLOGY The following sample situation has been devised to demonstrate the use of the recommended methodology. 1. Objective: To estimate the peak parking require- ments for a proposed mixed -use development. 2. Plan: The proposed development has the following components: • Office = 400,000 square feet GLA • Retail = 300,000 square feet GLA • Hotel = 500 rooms plus 5,000 square feet of restaurant and conference facilities with 200-seat capacity. 3. Location: The project will be located in the down- town of a medium -size urban community whose regional population is approximately 1.5 million. 4. Mode split:17 Based on surveys conducted at exist- ing developments in the downtown, it is estimated that 75 percent of employees and patrons and 50 percent of hotel guests will use autos. The number of persons per auto is assumed to be typical (1.2 for employees, 1.8 for patrons, 1.4 for hotel guests). 17"Mode split" refers to the percentage of people at a site who use a particular mode of transportation, with the total of all modes equaling 100 percent. 47 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 18, 1996 Paul O'Leary Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Site Modifications, 1350 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. O'Leary: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and Fire Chief Wally Possich were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 22, 1996 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S'n erel , Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 20 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 4 lieve anything should be at the end of Droset St. with no plan to improve the road. Ms. Pugh appreciated the decrease in land coverage but felt it would be too close to the road. 4. Revised Site Plan application of Mery Brown for construc- tion of a 29,425 sq. ft. building containing office and re- tail uses, 1342 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Llewellyn said they have addressed the water line and hydrant placement questions. The original approval was for a 2-story u-shaped building with commercial upstairs and retail down -stairs, with access off Holmes Rd. There would be 154 parking spaces. This was approved in May, 1988. Mr. Brown has purchased the property now and wants to change from a U- shape to an L-shape. The building has been widened a bit but the square footage is the same. The sewer line will now be straighter and will be extended to serve the residential units on the back lot. Mr. Weith said it meets coverage, parking and traffic requirements. The only question is land- scaping where $19,500 is required and he estimates only $15,600 is shown. A local firm has estimated the landscaping shown at $17,000. Mrs. Maher asked if more landscaping is needed. Mr. Weith said he can see areas that could use more landscaping. Members agreed to have Mr. Weith approve the additional landscaping. Mr. Craig asked if there will be any trailers for storage. Mr. Brown said there would not and he would have no problem if they were prohibited. Members felt the dumpster should be screened. Mr. Brown said this causes a problem with trucks pulling up to it. He agreed to screen it from the neighbors. Mr. Brown said the payment for the additional faces on the traffic light has already been arranged. Mr. Burgess said there should be a stipulation that the parking lot not be used for Christmas trees, etc. but only for parking. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the revised sittplan application of Mery Brown for construction of a 29,425 sq. ft. building for office and retail use as depicted on a 6 page set of plans titled "Holmes Road Commercial, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared �2y Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., and dated 12/20/88 with the following stipulations: 1. A 3-year $19,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. A revised landscaping plan which meets the $19,500 required value shall be submitted to the City Planner for ap- proval prior to permit. 2. The existing Shelburne Rd. curb cuts shall be closed. 3. A sewer allocation of 1650 gpd is granted and the $2.50 PLANNING COMMISSION 13 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 5 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 5. A concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Shelburne Rd. and a bond posted prior to permit. Sidewalk must include a handicapped ramp. 6. The portion of the 80 foot r.o.w. located on this property shall be dedicated to the City prior to permit. Legal doc- uments (Offer of dedication and Deed) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to permit. 7. The fourth face of this signal must be installed and be operating prior to permit. 8. The sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension shall extend across the driveway and stop where the road stops. It shall be uniform grade across the driveway with no dips or breaks. Sidewalk must include a handicapped ramp. 9. The sewer manhole shall have a stub extending easterly. 10. Compact car spaces shall be signed to allow compact car parking only. 11. The pi e for the storm drainage system shall be concrete or plastic, not metal or aluminum. 12. An additional hydrant shall be provided on the property in a location to be approved �?y the Fire Chief. 13. Based upon expressed representation b Applicant, there shall be no trailers used for storage on the site. 14. There shall be screening provided for the trash compactor 15. Parking spaces shall be used for vehicle parking only and shall not be used for sales of items such as Christmas trees, oil paintings, etc. 16. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Ills. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 5. Site Plan application of J.G. Architects, Inc. for con- struction of a 10,400 sq. ft. building for light industrial use, lot #4 of. the Berard industrial subdivision, Ethan Allen Drive Doug Veeman said the building will be one story, totally PLANNING COMMISSION 20 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 6 sprinklered, with offices in front, manufacturing in back. The loading dock will be in front. It was noted that the Fire Chief says there is not access to the back. Mr. Veeman said he didn't feel this is needed because the building is sprinklered. Also, all the entrances are in front and there are no openings in back. The lot is very narrow. Mr. Weith said the landscaping is inadequate. They need $6,000 and he estimates they have provided $3500. Mr. Veeman said there is a line of mature trees in back and some on the property. Mr. Burgess said there would have to be a survey of existing trees in order to get credit for them. Mr. Weith felt increasing the size of proposed trees would help. Mr. Craig said he was concerned that the problem with access might apply to the next tenant of the building if the present owner sells it. He said he would like to satisfy the Fire Chief if something can be worked out with abutters. Mr Burgess said he would be happy with a letter from the abutters saying they will keep an access to the back open. Ms. Pugh suggested a right-of-way for purposes of fire- fighting. Mr. Craig asked if there will be any trailers on the lot. Mr. Veeman said only in the loading dock area. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of J. G. Architects, Inc, for construction of a 10,400 sq.. ft. building for light manufacturing uses as depicted on a 2 page set of plans titled "RMH Associates dba Imprints/Versital Graphics," prepared 12y J.G. Architects, Inc and dated 11/4/88, last revised 12/15/88 with the following stipulations: 1. A_ $6000, 3-year landscape bond shall be posted prior to permit. The landscaping plan shall be revised to show an additional $2300 in landscaping value. The revised plan shall be submitted to the Planner for approval prior to permit _ 2. Based upon expressed representation of the applicant, no permanent storage shall be allowed in trailers on the site. 3. Applicant will enter into mutual right-of-way agreement with neighboring property owner for fire equipment access to the back fo the building. A copy of this agreement shall be on file with the City prior to permit. This approval is based on the expressed representation of the ajpp icant that the building is metal and �prinklerc(].� 2 WOODEN PLANT CONTAINERS EXISTING ' OQ 0- SIGN �t 0 Qom` _ HOL ME-5 LD I PLANT L /5 T KEY BOTANICAL NAME 0HJ PRUNU5 "HJ' eLL TILIA COKDATA _*AP PINU5 NI&PA CC COKN 55 MS AJ JUNIPERU5 CHINEN PK A550KTED PEKENNIAL5 -VARIETIE5 TO INC-1 LOE A5TILBE, GOREOP5I5, 0IANTHU5, DELPHINIUV, LUPINE, 5HA5TA OA15Y, Pl-COX, WHITE MARROW, JV GAWAAVLA AMIPERU5 VIRGINIANA TO THUJA OCC IDENTALI5 EXI5TING 2-5TORY COMMERCIAL DUILOING LOT COVERAGE 14,600 5Q. FT. 14.785 50. FT. GENERAL OFFICE SPACE 13,661 5Q. FT. RETAIL FLOOR SPACE BOLLARD - TYPE LIGHTING ITYPIGALI �� H✓ O O I EXISTING 6' BA5KET WEAVE FENCE NEW 6' 5CREENINC7 FENCE Q QQ Q AROUND GARDAGE 0151`05AL MULCHED 15LAND rr / 1 BENCH SEAT` J �ITYP/GAL) / Cam// e l� EXISTING TKA5H CANS ON C014CRETE PAD EXI5TINO 0UMP5TER LL PLANTINGS JV + TO 12 COMPACT 5PAGE5 WERE PKOP05E0, 10 COMPACT 51"AGE5 AND ONE HANDICAP COMPACT GAR 51"AGE5 WERE BUILT. G G G G G G G G G G G G G I'drd G G G G G G G G G G H✓ Q t{�i AP* 5 n , V J LL Lt.rt�t2 tv.Rw�' AP� Z_BLt'c —5PRUGE TREE "'��—-21_'KUcE --- EXTEN5 /ON - - EXI5TIN6 5LOPE PLANTED WITH WILDFLOWER MIX APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN COMMERCIAL ONE AND KE5IDENTIAL FOUR ZONING DI5TRICT5. — _ NO TES - - - - - GENERAL CC CJITION5 REGARDING LAN05GAPE I ALL PLANT AATERIAL TO BE FREE OF 015EA5E, 1AFE5TAT101v5 OR DAMAGE. 10-4-96 REVISED PER CITY REVIEW MRM COMMON NAME QUANTITY SIZE REMARKS 2 ALL PLANT MAtE,eIALS TO BE WARRANTED AAb A/AINTAMtED AT AN ACCEPTABLE ante deecrk+tlon I by QUALITY FOR OAE YEAR AND SU _CCT TO APPROVAL OF LANSGAPE DE5I6NER. REVISIONS HALLY JOLIYETTE CHERRY 13 1 1/2 - 2' J. FAILED OR U'6AT15FAG7'O9Y PLAN MATERIAL TO BE REPLACED AT NO G05T 1HM KAM ellx IAtSf muola LIOaO / a LITTLE -LEAF LINDEN 11 3' - 3 1/2" D+D TO TFE O WAER. OW K L0 TK ROE stl w root 91m, 4. ALL WORK, MATERIAL5 AND IN5TALLATION TO BE IN AGCOROANGE WITH THE SKETCH/CONCEPT AAERIGAN A550GIATION OF NbIZ5EXYMAN 5TAM�AW$. PRELIMINARY AUSTRIAN PINE 14 7' - 8" O+D FINAL GORNELIAN CHERRY 53 18' - 24' G SULtiMARY OF INSTALLATION RECORD DRAWING n I ALL DECIDUOUS TREE5 TO BE BALLED AAC7 MIRLAPPED, WRAPPED (OR P`o ANDORRA JUNIPER 257 1 GAL C GONTAIW91ZEOL FERTILIZED, MU_GHEi, 5TAKED A110 WATERED IN Shelburne Square .,,ree ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN A550CIATION OF NUP5ERYMAN 5,TANDAR05. OKI6/ONAL i.AN056APE PLAN BY xxx PERENNIAL5 200 - 2 CONTAINERIZED OR iSFB" 5HR605 TO BE PLANTED, FERTILIZED AAO FITZPATRICK - LLEWELLYN INC. Oty of South BurLn`ton, VT n AAJ-GI"ED. DRAWN NOV. tW, LAST REVI5ION NO 3. SPAGIN6 AMD LOCATIONS A5 5HOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE 5U5✓EGT TO FIELD DATE "l-6-8�Y NOTED A5 1-6-68. LANDSCAPE 1- .-APPROVAL BY LAW51-APE DESIGNER. 4. FERTILIZER FOR TREE5 AAC> 5HRU55 TO BE M11-OR6ANITE OR 5IMILAR ANP RECORD DRAIF7NG CAL APPLIEDNU AGGORDIN6 TO MAAGTURERS 5PEGIFIGATION5. BONE AEAL, PJ0 OF GOA&ERCIAL QUALITY, TO BE APPLIED AT BASE 501L OF TREE/SIFLV dft � AMU =291ylRIp AT TI-E RATE OF 1/2 CUP PER 5WLA5 AND 1 GUP PER DIAAETER INCH 8_10- UPRIGHT JUNIPER 10 6' - 7' FULL OF TREE5. GRAF'HIC SCALE '1c THUJA 10 6' - 7' FULL 5. ALL TREE5 TO 6E FILLED IN A MIX OF OW FART PEAT,I PART ROTTED COW MAM RE, I PART TOP501L, AAC) I PART SOIL ON 5171E PLANTING MIX " " LAMOURNUX, STONE & O'LBARY Consulting l�inee" Inc. Z0' TOTAL 5HALL BE BERAED TO PROVIDE A 5AUGER FOR WATERING AROUND TRUNK5 14 More MI. Essex JWctlon. VT 05452 no. AND BARK OF WOOD CHIP MULCH FILLED TO A MINI" DEPTH OF 2' (III I=) (802) 878_4450 , 1 i.A - 20 M XDgineera-Planners-Surveyors City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 30, 1996 Paul O'Leary Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Site Modifications, 1350 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. O'Leary: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced projects from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Wally Possich and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, October 11, 1996. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Pl ning Commission From: Raymond J. Belairquth Burlington Ym g Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, October 22, 1996 Agenda Items Date: September 30, 1996 KENNETH SMITH - ADDITIONAL USES - SITE PLAN --- plans submitted are acceptable. --- staff recommends that the applicant not request approval for auto sales and auto rental. These uses would need the plan to show spaces devoted to display and storage and the spaces available for the remaining uses in the building. --- staff recommends against outdoor recreation because the plan needs to show the site plan for the outdoor recreation use. --- staff recommends that contractor's yards have a condition that if there is any exterior storage, it must go back to the Planning Commission for approval. PLAZA INVESTMENTS - PARKING & LANDSCAPING MODIFICATIONS - SITE PLAN --- plant list should indicate the quantity of the proposed replacement landscaping and the reduction in the number of Austrian Pine. The replacement landscaping must equal the value of the new landscaping. --- staff counts 146 spaces on the plan and 152 spaces are required. Shared parking analysis recommends 147 spaces. --- submit 11" x 17" reduction of plan. --- plan should include a north arrow. --- show zoning boundary line between Cl and R4 Districts. ROGER & KAREN HOWARD - RETAIL TO MARINE SALES - SITE PLAN --- site plan application should be signed by the applicant. --- parking spaces along the northerly boundary should be perpendicular not angled. --- provide front yard coverage information for each of the front yards. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: October 22, 1996 Agenda Items Date: September 26, 1996 100 DORSET STREET COMPLEX - DORSET STREET 1. Drywell in rear of proposed building should be connected to a inlet. Drywells do not work especially in the winter. 2. Site plan dated August 14, 1996 is acceptable. KEN SMITH PROPERTY - LOTS 25 & 26 - COMMERCE AVENUE Site plan prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn dated April, 1995 is acceptable. HINSDALE PROPERTIES - 10 PATCHEN ROAD Site plan received August 20, 1996 is acceptable. HOWARD COVE MARINE, INC. - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan received August 29, 1996 is acceptable. SHELBURNE SQUARE - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Plans must include a north arrow. 2. Site plans prepared by Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary dated 6/10/96 are acceptable with the north arrow added. RENE J. BERARD - SUBDIVISION PLAN - BERARD DRIVE Subdivision plan dated 8/9/96 prepared by William Chase surveyor is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Wallace Possich, South Burlington Fire Chief Re: Plans Reviewed for October 22, 1996 Agenda Date: September 18, 1996 I have reviewed the listed site plans and my comments are as follows: 1. Hinsdale Properties Dated 8/20/96 10 Patchen Road Acceptable 2. Subdivision/Berard for Ayer Dated 9/4/96 Berard Drive Acceptable 3. Ken Smith Property Dated 8/14/96 Commerce Avenue Project No. 95039 Acceptable 4. Shelburne Square Dated 8/23/96 Holmes Road Extension Project No. 96076 Acceptable 5. Howard Cove Marine, Inc. Dated 8/29/96 1800 Shelburne Road Acceptable 6. Century Partners Dated 8/14/96 100 Dorset Street Project No. 94022-43 Acceptable A1.5 72 �� 1v6o 32I -..� PLANT LIST A/pi '-7- -* e 9 NYC ` 141G �� (. V (,I�(I.G'l.�,aF (I NM4VTi L A A% 4W-PkTA 1l Z 26 M" FINE/r(Nu-, ►�1�1 g 53 GG ?Spr--� AAIk4, wr- N-OK-T4-+6,P'-,,�RN �t Il,b�t.oril -- ►.� �X wV I Pie -Mr 12AM) V4 A,a , CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION (AMENDMENT) 1) OWNER OF RECORD ( name, address, phone # ) 863-1389 Plaza Investments 1350 Shelburne Road, Suite 200, So. Burlington, VT 05403 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Same as owner 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone # ) Paul O'Leary I Lamoureux. Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc., 14 Morse Drive, Essex Jct., VT 05452 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Holmes Road Extension 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Amendment of existing site plan approval 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, T units, maximum height and r floors, square feet per floor) 14,785 sf, general office space, 13,881 sf. retail office space 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES --- 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 13.8 %; landscaped areas 34.2 % building, parking, outside storage 52.0% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ existing , Landscaping $ 2,000 Other Site Improvements (plea:se list with cost) $ New dumpster area screening fence - $1,500 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 4 weeks after approval 12 ) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( in and out) As previously approved Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13 ) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: As previously approved 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: A� previously .approved 14y. DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT No Text 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 L,,�OUREUX, STONE & O'LEAt, r Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors October 4, 1996 Raymond Belair Zoning and Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Shelburne Square - Site Modifications 1350 Shelburne Road, South Burlington Dear Ray: (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 We are submitting the revised site modification plans as requested on September 30, 1996. The following changes have been made per your request: 1) The twelve Austrian Pines (AP) that were removed from the eastern side of the property are to be replaced by ten Upright Junipers (JV) and ten Thujas (TO). The Austrian Pines are valued at $200 each. The Upright Junipers and Thujas are valued at $120 each; 2) The original plan showed 152 parking spaces. One (1) parking space was replaced by the construction of a concrete trash can pad. Two (2) parking spaces will be eliminated for the proposed screening of the dumpsters. One (1) parking space was eliminated due to the addition of a wider handicap parking space on the eastern side of the building. We originally miscounted the number of compact parking spaces along the southeast boundary. There are actually 25 parking spaces not 23 as previously shown. The plan was revised to show the 148 usable parking spaces after the proposed changes; 3) The north arrow has been added to the plan; 4) The approximate zoning boundary between the Residential four and the Commercial one zones was added to the plan; 5) One (1) 11" x 17" copy of plan is attached for your use. If you have any questions, please call our office. Sincerely, Matt Morgia enc. cc: Mery Brown W AMATTM\96076RAY. WPD Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Hydrogeological Investigation • Planning • Land Surveying PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 April 10, 1996 Mery Brown 1350 Shelburne Road, Suite #200 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Shelburne Plaza Dear Mr. Brown: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 We recently received a complaint from an abutting property owner to your 1350 Shelburne Road property. He indicated that the dumpsters were not screened as required. I investigated and found the following discrepancies between the site and the approved plan. 1. The dumpsters are not located in their approved location and are not screened as required. The dumpsters are currently located in approved parking spaces which is not permitted. 2. The approved plan showed 17 Austrian Pine trees 7' - 8' in height planted along the easterly boundary. These trees are missing. 3. The 37 compact car spaces must be signed as compact car spaces. This was a requirement of your 12/20/88 approval (see enclosed). Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss a time - frame for taking corrective action. Thank you. SYynd ely, RJ. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl City of South iu><•lin(ftoli 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 March 15, 1989 Mery Brown Suite 1 200 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Merv: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find ,your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl 1 ` CITY OF SOUTH BURLING'ION f Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT I 1) Name of Applicant 2) Name of Subdivision d) ►_ n A\ r F -r-7- rNRn'5r=- V-q ,1•)r= ".- , �k t" C=!? C 1 At t','OZitC. 3) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: _ —t�} c" i3 01 1 VUI, W i L t r1 r t C (4 A+J L, Q F 0 M ad l �-I Qo �� N S H 1 -U) t io 1, cti N T W C i S CC -(7010 A .AJ,O i2 S M0 ✓ 1 Av4 T1 t E LV T Ay Z19,4 .2 w' l A/L W/1 t�4 a NV S) Submit four copies of a final set of plans consisting of a final plat plus engineeringdrawings and containing all information required under section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit t&o draft copies of all legal documents required under section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. /--, (Signature) applicant or contact person Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 19, 1990 Mr. Mery Brown 1350 Shelburne Road Suite 200 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Shelburne Plaza, Lilydale Bakery Dear Merv: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 In a letter dated June 1, 1990, City Manager, Chuck Haft.er, approved an additional sewer allocation of 2,250 gpd for the Lilydale Bakery. The City' sewer allocation policy requires a payment. of $2.50 per gallon of allocation. Therefore, you are required to pay a fee of $5,625 for the additional 2,250 gpd. Please send the payment to Zoning Administrator, Dick: Ward, the City apologizes for not making you aware of the fee payment policy sooner. C' erely, i oe Weith, City Planner cc.: Dick Ward JW/mcp State of Vermont Building Permit LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules CASE NO. P 1_..- Chapter 4, Public Buildings APPLICANT ennis.Blodgett/Gerald M—il4t Appendix A, Design Guidelines ADDRESS 1 'FieTGi'4 South Burlington, VT 05401 This project, consisting of constructing a 29,424 square foot building on an existing 7.5 acre parcel for use as office and retail space located at the intersection of U.S. Route 7 and Holmes Road Extension in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve you, as applicant, from obtaining all approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project Number 88015 Sheet 1 of 5 dated April 1988, last revised 6- 7-88; Sheet 2 of 5 dated April 1988 and Sheet 3 of 5 (Trench Detail Only) dated April 1988 Prepared by FitzPatrick - Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (4) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (5) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, and with this permit. WATER SUPPLY (6) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the municipal water service depicted on the approved plans. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. (7) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Department of Health's "Letter of Approval" to *887 to Dennis Blodgett dated September 13, 1988. Dennis Blodge, erald Milot PB-4-1501 Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (8) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment f¢cility for a maximum of 1650 gallons of sewage per day. (9) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Protection Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. PLUMBING (10) Prior to commencement of construction of the building(s), the applicant must submit to the Division one set of interior plumbing floor plans which match the exterior water and sewer services. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 16 day of September, 1988. cc: Donald Robisky Town Planning,./ Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. E City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 February 6, 1989 Mr. Mery Brown Suite 1 200 Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Holmes Road Commercial Dear Mr. Woods: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the January 17, 1989 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Item 1 indicates that a stipulation was inadvertently left out of the approval motion as indicated in the 12/20/88 minutes. Please make note of this stipulation. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, J0, Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 }'.nC1. (•(.*: Lances i.A ewel lyn r. llecem e�uGO, 6iS�n8Unda items December 16, 1988 page 3 At the 8/9/88 meeting, Mr. Milot contended that the proposed project promotes the Act 200 goal for addressing affordable housing. I feel it is important to point out other Act 200 goals such as the following: o "Intensive residential development shall be encouraged primarily in areas that are identified as village or urban centers." o "Development shall be planned so as to maintain the historic settlement pattern of compact village and urban centers separated by rural countryside." o "Public investments, including the construction or expansion of infrastructure, shall. be made so as to support development in a locally designated growth area, and shall not be made so as to lead to development in important and economically viable agricultural or conservation areas." o "The rate of growth should not exceed the ability of the town and the area to provide facilities and services." 4) HOLMES ROAD COMMERCIAL, 1342 SHELBURNE ROAD Mery Brown proposes to revise the approved Site Plan for construction of an office/retail building at 1342 Shelburne Road. The original Site Plan application for this project was approved by the Planning Commission on 5/10/88. The minutes from this meeting are enclosed. The main difference between the approved plan and the proposed revision are summarized below: Item Total square footage Office Space Retail Space Tota.1 Lot. Coverage Parking Spaces Compact Car Space Approved Revised Plan Plan 29,424 16,000 13,424 G.F.A. 76% 154 31 29,425 14,785 13,881 G.L.A. 69% 152 37 Landscaping Value $13,680 $15,630 Coverage: Coverage requirements are met. The original approved plan violated total lot coverage requirements (76% proposed, 70% maximum allowed). The revised plan meets total. lot coverage requirements (69% proposed). Memorandum - Phnning December 20, 128 agenda items December 16, 128 Page 4 Parking:_ The ;roposed uses require 152 spaces and 152 spaces are shown. 37 spaes are for compact cars which equates to 24.3% of the total propsed. The City's zoning ordinance allows 25% to be compact car spew. Traffic: Basic on I.T.E. trip generation rates, the proposed uses would genrate 95 trips during the peak hour. This site is located in Zon*4 of the Traffic Overlay District which allows a maximum peak hur trip generation of 95. Landscaping: Ike project requires $19,500 in landscaping. My calculations atimate the proposed landscaping at a value of $15,630. The gpli(-,ant estimates the proposed landscaping to be worth $24,760. A local landscape firm is preparing an estimate for me and I hq* to have it prior to Tuesday' meeting. In the 5/10/88approval., a stipulation was included which allowed the applicantis count existing trees as credit toward meeting landscaping regirements. These trees were never identified. If the proposed Indscape plan is determined deficient in meeting the required w ue, I would recommend that existing trees be credited. Homrer, the trees to be saved should be identified and approved b:me prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Even if it is deter•mind that the proposed landscape plan meets the required value.1 urge that as many existing trees as possible be saved. 5) J.G. ARCHITTS, LOT 4, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE J.G. Architect, Inc.. proposes to construct a 2-stony, 14,300 square foot buiid:ing for light industrial (T-Shirt printing) uses on lot 4 of tl*Berard Subdivision on Ethan Allen Drive. Of the 14,400 squaret6et, 10,400 square feet would be on the first floor and the waining 4,000 square feet on the second floor. They property i zoned lncfi.ist.rial-Commercial. The property is bounded on theorth by vacant land, on the east by Kelco, on the west by a tr•ud*epair• business, crud on the south by Ethan Allen Drive. Access/Circu.lafan: Access would be provided by a 20 foot wide driveway off Elfin. Allen Drive. Circulation is provided only in front. of the lslding. This is primarily due to the narrowness of the lot. Chief Goddetteinformed me that he needs access along at least one side of t* building for its entire length in order to provi.de adequW4 fire protection. The only way this could be done is by mom ing the footprint of the building to make it more narrow. 4 State of Vermont r Supply and Wastewater Disposal LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Permit ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES CASE NO. WW-4-0061-1 Chapter 4, Public Buildings APPLICANT Plaza Investments ADDRESS 200 Twin Oaks Terrace Suite 5 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 This project, consisting of amending Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit # WW-4-0061 to provide one 6 inch sewer service from the proposed building to the sewer line extension located off Holmes Road Extension in the City of South Burlington , Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not constitute Act 250 approval (Title V.S.A., Chapter 151). The permittee is hereby reminded to procure all relevant State and local permits prior to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans labelled Project Number 88124 sheet 1 of 6 "Site and Utilities Plan", dated November 1988 last revised January 11, 1989 , prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) All conditions set forth in Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit # WW-4-0061 dated January 10, 1989 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. (4) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (5) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (6) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, and with this permit. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation BY Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 16th day of February 1989. cc: Donald Robisky South Burlington Planning Commission Louis Borie Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry File PB-4-1501 and W1,1-4-0061 State of Velrniorit. Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council Plaza lnvestments 200 '1,J' in Uaks Terrace dui So. Burlington, VT 05-403 RE: WW-4-0061 Amends PB-4-1501. Changing previously approved municipal connections. Greetings: C`7 ` AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 December 28, PU88 We received your completed application for the referenced permit on December 2', 1988, including a fee of $25. This application falls under the Water/Wastewater: Greater than LOOO G11D Program Area, and under the Performance :standards for this program area, we have a maximum of 45 days of 'in-house' time for our review of your application. Based upon the present workload, we anticipate review of your project within the next 3-4 weeks. If we need further information from you in order to react; a decision on your application, t:he time we. wait for your submittal of that information does not count, against the allowable ill -House time specified in the performance standards. if' �oii have any questions about the review process, Or if y'uu have riot received a decision on -our applical ion within the permitted time of 45 days in-house, please contact this office at. 879-6563. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Re-ional Engineer cc: FitzpatricUlewellyn So. Burlington Planning Commission ✓ y /' el . Parks„� s�vus s � " ft ist� -h� as ?o.ss� �fe a,� -� k s.r,,od r.&f #d A pusfi Pp� � � o,�,.t s �,wl 6� � s c��►�elo�-�e�r� 1 �a � 3 9 ►AXx�wmf rnw*4- 'F 0- e- s � � � �✓�or^%�n, r�. PLANNING COMMISSION 16 DECEMBER 1986 PAGE 3 the revised plan. Mrs. Maher seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 4. Site plan application of Julian Goodrich; agent, for construction of a 8303 sq. ft.*building-for-Onion River Pottery, lot #12 Ethan Allen Farms. During this discussion, Mr. Belter stepped down from the Commission due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Goodrich explained that Onion River Pottery manufactures \� ceramic cups. The are now located in Winooski and have 11 employees. The lot is .9 acre, 120 ft. wide and 350 ft. \� S deep. The depth of the lot causes a problem as the last400 ,,,`✓ is unusable because of a steep pitch. As there are trucks '!. coming to deliver and pick up goody a 4 ft. loading dock is needed. The 5 ft. rise in the land is ideal for the loading operation; however, the 15' side setback requirement requires the moving of the dock to a less desirable location. Mr. Gcc0t',-h explained that they usually have 1 UPS and one other w trailer truck per day.. They are also requesting 2 curb cuts, one for the trucks and one for employees. Since they are at the end of the line of buildings, they didn't feel this would be a problem. +�a Mr. Dooley asked if it would be possible to merge one curb cut with an adjacent lot. Mr. Belter said that the Masons, who have the adjacent lot under lease, feel this would be a problem for them. Mrs. Lafleur noted that there is no landscaped buffer along ti the back of the parking area to the property line as they chose to put in a 5-foot strip adjacent to the building. Mr. Belter said that most likely snow would be pushed to the rear of the lot. Members felt they would rather see the 5-foot . buffer along the adjacent lot. Mr. Goodrich agreed to provide a revised landscaping plan. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan implication of Julian Goodrich Architect, agent for construction of a 8303 sq. ft. building for light manufactur- ing and office space for Onion River Pottery, lot #12 'Ethan Allen Drive as depicted on a Plan entitled "Onion River Pottery" prepared by J.G.Architects, Inc, dated December 5, 1986 with the following stipulations: �1. A $2280�\landsca in bond shall be posted prior to permit. The plans s all be revised to reflect this value and shall include lar e trees in locations approved 12y the City Planner 1) 2) 3) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION NAME, ADDRESS, AND P'lONE NUMBER OF: a) Owner of Record Mery Brown 200 Twin Oaks Terrace, Suite One, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 b) Applicant Same as above c) Contact Person Lance Llewellyn, FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Incoporated, One Wentworth Drive, -Williston, Vermont 05495 PROJECT STREET ADDRESS;Corner of Route 7 and Holmes Road Extension PROPOSED USE (s) Retail/Commercial 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum height and #floors 14,785 s.f. office, 13,881 s.f. retail on two floors, one building 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full and part time): 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building 13.8 %; Building, Parking, Outside Storage: 52.0 % 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ 1,200,000.00 Landscaping $ 24,750.00 Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $ Paving, utilities, grading: $300,000.00 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLE`1ION DATE: Fall 1989 ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY 'I RAFFIC ( in and out) See enclosed study PEAK HOUR (s) OF OPERATION: 4pm - 6pm PEAK DAY (s) OF OPERATION: Friday SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Memorandum July 10, 1987 Page 4 these uses during peak traffic on Shelburne Road. If the Zoning Board denies the application for the setback of the C1 district line the Commission may approve the higher traffic generation if it finds that the reduction in curb cuts, the signal etc. produces a net benefit to traffic flow (Section 17.50). The Commission could also require a traffic study and apply the PCD standards. If this project is approved, the 4 phase traffic signal must be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. 00 Landscaping: , worth of new landscaping is required for this proposed development; $5700.00 worth is shown. At the last meeting Judy Hurd suggested that street trees be planted along the new Holmes Road Extension. These should be shown on revised plans and should be 3 - 4 inch minimum caliper. I will have further landscaping recommendations at the meeting. Other: A sewer allocation of 1650 gallons/day must be made and $2.50 per gallon paid prior to permit. See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 0© NATIONWIDE °�' "��fz - V� INSURANCE Nationwide is on your side HOME OFFICE'. ONE NATIONWIDE PLAZA • COLUMBUS, OHIO 43216 \ V� Blodgett Insurance \\ 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 November 25, 1987 City of South Burlington Jane B. Lafleur City Planner 575 Dorset Street Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Jane; Per phone conversation of November ��9 7, this memo is to request an extension of the buildi perr t for the project approved July 21, 1987 on the C1 portion of my property located at 1342 Shelburne Road. As you are aware, I am in the process of negotiations with Rich Tarrant of IDX regarding the shared construction costs of Holmes Road Extension. I anticipate that this issue will be resolved soon and thus be in a position to begin construction of that road and my approved project when weather permits in the spring of 1988. Thank you for your attention to this matter and I do appreciate the time you have given me throughout this permit and planning process. Sincerely, Denny Blodge t DLB/kyr CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Dennis Blodgett, Blodgett Insurance, Shelburne Road, So. Burl., VT 2) APPLICANT (name, address, ph one #) 864 0950 Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 289 College Street, Burl., VT 05401 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Gary Lavigne, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 864 0950 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1340 and 1342 Shelburne Rd_ So _ , Bur , VT 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) /tommercial - office (Phase one, two and three) 2-1/2 floors, 37,500 sf, max. height 35 ft (lst floor 15,000 sf, 2nd floor 15,000 sf,.3rd floor 7,500 sf) 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 2-1/2 floors, 37,500 s.f. max. height 35 ft (1st floor 15,000 sf, 2nd floor 15,000 sf, 3rd floor 7,500 sf) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 150 # units, 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 11.6o%; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage 54.2% $5,500 new 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 1,600,000 , Landscaping $ and Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ $16,500 credit Phase one - Feb 88 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Phase two - Jan 89 Phase three - Jan 90 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 461 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. , 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 83 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS -OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 1 _ DATE OV SU MISSION DATE OF HEARING - 9.:00 -Aj4 5:00 Monday - Fr SIGNATURE APPLICANT State of Vermont AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council December 21,1990 Plaza Investments 200 Twin Oaks Terrace, Suite 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Permit WW-4-0061; Commercial Building, Holmes Road Extension, South Burlington, Vt. Dear Gentlemen: We have received a completion inspection letter dated July 9,1990 from Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. This hereby satisfies condition No. 10 of the above referenced Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. Thank you for your close attention to the permit conditions. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer CC: City of South Burlington Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. A G E N D A South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont SPECIAL MEETING Q7:30 P.M. Tuesday, July 21, 1987 1) Continue review of site plan application of Dennis Blodgett to construct a 30,000 square foot building for office and retail use at 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road. 2) Other business: Respectfully submitted, Kathryn Perkins, Acting Planner M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission )r4I_ From: Kathryn Perkins, Acting Plannerw/1 Re: Dennis Blodgett, 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road Date: July 17, 1987 1) DENNIS BLODGETT, 1340 - 1342 SHELBURNE ROAD Last week we reviewed Mr. Blodgett's site plan, and found discrepancies with the lot boundaries. Since then it has been determined by Dick Ward, Steve Stitzel, and Mr. Blodgett's attorney that the parcel is one lot split by the C1 and R4 zone lines. Therefore, my original calculations were correct based on, a 2.8 acre lot of existing C1 land, plus the land in the 50 foot. extension of the Cl District granted by the Zoning Board. The applicant has agreed to make an offer of irrevocable, dedication to the City for the r.o.w. for the east -west Holmes Road extension from Shelburne Road to Green Mountain Drive. H 1\1N Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 October 5, 1988 Mr. Joseph Weith Planning Office Municipal Building Dorset Street S. Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Blodgett Property Dear Mr. Weith: Enclosed please find our stormwater runoff evaluation of the site plan for the Blodgett property prepared by Fitzpatrick/Llewellyn, Inc. Our recommendations to the Planning Commission have been made based on the Soil Conservation Service TR-20 hydrologic model which has been set up for the Bartlett/North Brook watersheds. The results of the simulation indicate that with slight modifications to the volume, and a revised outlet structure, that the existing pond at the IDS site will result in proper management of stormwater for the 25-year 24-hour storm. Should you have any questions on this material, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jeffrey A. Nelson, Geologist Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. JAN/tj r cc: Charlie Van Winkle ATTACHMENT BARTLETT/NORTii BROOK WATERSHEDS BLODGETT PROPERTY HYDROLOGIC REVIEW SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed development plans prepared by Fitzpatrick - Llewellyn for the Blodgett Property in South Burlington, Vermont have been reviewed for hydrologic impact on the North Brook/Bartlett Brook watersheds. 2. The site is located immediately to the north of the IDS property, which was reviewed as part of the facility expansion in 1986. The Blodgett site is located within subwatersheds III, IV and V of the North Brook watershed (see Attachment, page 1). Revisions were made to these subwatershed characteristics to reflect proposed development conditions (see Attachment, page 6). 3. The projected peak discharge rate from the site and the areas immediately upslope from it during the 25-year 24-hour design storm is projected to be 27.66 cfs for the post -development condition (see Attachment, page 3). This is in excess of the estimated pre -development peak discharge rate of 20 cfs (based on average unitized peak discharge rates for subwatersheds III, IV and V). 4. The applicant proposes to use the existing stormwater retention pond on the IDS site to manage stormwater from the Blodgett property. A slight increase to the size of the pond has been proposed to accommodate the additional volume of stormwater. 5. A review of the final design for the IDS pond indicates that the outflow works have not been designed in accordance with the recommendations of our 1986 evaluation. Specifically, a 12" diameter outlet pipe has been specified instead of the recommended 24" diameter pipe. The implications of this are that the pond may overflow onto Route 7 during large storms, given the current contributing areas from the IDS site and upslope. Therefore, no additional stormwater can be accommodated in the IDS pond without improvement of the outflow device. 6. Based on an outflow versus elevation curve which has been specified (Attachment 18) and the proposed pond enlargement, the stormwater management goals of the South Burlington Planning Commission will be met, and the pond will not overflow during a 25-year storm event. The results of the TR-20 simulations indicate that the peak discharge rate for the 25-year storm for the North Brook watershed is projected to be 151.3 cfs. This represents a slight decrease from the peak conditions of 153 cfs. �t 1� Y O c C23 24" x 40' m C25 1.0-N 16" x 85' � Salt- N i gAi TLETT BRO3, S / NATURAL FLOW PATTERN DISTURSO - BY -DEVELOPMENT / / / / 20 25 16" . 1 v Q o n Ste- N WEIR 91, C_ F Z � • Z � G^ a S o POW FINAL PLAT J _ LEGEND i -- .LS•.nETeC s-^•L`�- - ,.�c =ccis G[ I I -' I t s r .-. ¢v c_�e-a< ._.n I ti/e I •.I �e [ I �_ _ _ _ iesE..[JT : �[ —� .ti •eseD aTear +a..Ea s I !-•L-.e E_ci � c_cy ^CP.c�cD icci•.c.-ctau �.-a.v<.ar _•�� __ ���-- 1 � LtiET..,cl -iL ._■ ,I-.rYJ[C •,'I ___ -- rt ____ E'_•1-�:cL . E. .. , '1 + it . " •I /, - - � - - 1 .7u�L r•. \- - - - - - - - - - ^.r •c�Ec -r�.�5 :�T II \ - \ / ° � CI lel i..i I •I I•.I � i.I � I .r T I I �..f \`•...,`�, I,; -\/ _ > t - _ --;�- t` 1 .?�� ` \ � a 1 I I I' -, I "• , - - - _ _ \ Y - \�- ,_��_ —_. ' _ ; �-tom'.•- J•�— L-m $ - PGA tX- r• - f _ \� I �p" `_ tc�:a /�—��\�� __ _ ` EI _ -- -- TT''�t \\`` � G S/v.N - • _ � �7 j was - ,II `d �,`^ 1•• , ^ �', 11�:` ,' 1.y�-fir._' - �• �-- � . , — _— _�.--•----. ----- ° m .�� ;`t 1 ` .``tom i/•.%^..` .>' - / i �\`'- `i bDf+,Zr-Y it �I ..ter%• ��'i ,f.- •�� ., __�• • E 'I ,,. L i 1 '' 1 1 , I. s••+w-!aA_aw..ca JT pE-..,>r au•^.oE � � I 1 t1�\ � '�` �` , , •�e •a.�+'e,...Ic,Tou . vT .. / 1 I I .._--_. � - - �/ 11®\ 1 lW . v �t � � ; t. oeecEc :aee . e t=) xtEfi j I lL� • IT IS THE USERS R£SPONS,81L/TY TO ENSURE TM):SF ORAW1Nu'S I NCLUDE THE LATEST REVISIONS. a1 II .—_. \,ir - - / �1••` ``�♦ ` ` `� I `` �� i r D¢e�1• xxe.s �e•J w LT••.1 .D . a .n,l� v �.'� 7 Si dLE r ap• , •e AT o.,> •L [o°ow :� •r. cueys • ��•'' b� 11 \ `.1. >v \ --• \ ` Tc•�"�ic>.o:s a.,o .,� ....�uc [ .�•o! ..e.,.uT .. .� n,.• ,. -� �'> �•1- •1 � t ``� \ I '� % ,.e- re. e:yeE � i. C .JCJ• , / a `-J� F `' : �� �� t I; I ;�'a , • =;' BLODGETT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT --�Ly�l J �r...rr F°�/ 'f�' �,�``t','• i i l '.. i •. D<<...R . ��. c i NTIA P RT1GN— DE l' I J. •W . ,• L ca ^'¢ wc.E:•� 4.,[ .J�Oc.n°«.erl yD-ie ^T•..a R_5 L �{ II f , •� �� --./ t l 1 v ; L 1 Rca_ .•,.-.� .' ..-. e..-•-wo �,�.v •T: __ ti� Tt n,o •ap^ -.eE .ct'e, H.�w'_ /.. ; .i. �C� - �.i ', , v <�..%•'..}I_`'t ,. °' _E��r4c.o '�"`.eca`-o e-2.i-:-0 -- ITE & UTILITIES PLAN 1 pp /.•��•Cr'- t e % � ►` '` �/ v9 { (, 4 t �.. �� oo.;._D ..,,[, re-� [cE-a5 .v-.o , - ,.-..-,[,DR,-,L „eRas � � C: ,: •! _ �i. ��:` • � / ; 'I a �.. „t Dca a e„ cc o ...-. ..._ 4 I J'�� `t/! "; i % fi';`\ �5 -'- - - -- -- 'I,IJ a_7 ♦ .iIS., i'%; i;J =.- / - / I 1:.�/�'- _ \t , , Y \ _ _. I .ft.VI.1•T''rl'•:.E:?IK TLC __._._- —__ _ -_.�. , 1'r1• r,•, �1�: J�u�U� LU dme/e«Lo'1,9;s 88 Ll E rV E d k HFJ 1� PROJECT LC INCORPORATED J./ /� � 11I �. 9 /v _�y. .,,-.T-•ts.: ,a[...rr•.c ..° ., ...•.c •r..mn jl D-IG23 / / ,\.f\ l , r t M _ w _ Ce `aoe'wC.rr�,y�pa .• •.. r`•'� //J/�J//. \ ` t ' v s-•' ' � EE AUG 17 1558 wRUSTDN v[nrAONT f 3 ' .._ � ^'•' /•' .,/ fi \` J •/./Nf, • _ _ _ .- �'R(V!S,ONS DATE _ _ _ TR20 XEO REV 05/02/83 NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 10-03-88 (BLODGETT) 1�. JOB 1 SUMMARY PAGE ' 26 ' SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDPOGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA ik COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) 1 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 STRUCTURE 20 RUNOFF .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.83 .AA- 12.01 14.07 2164.1 XSECTION 2 REACH .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.81 146.58 12.11 14.08 2165.6 STRUCTURE 31 RUNOFF 002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.59 AA- 11.96 4.50 2500.6 STRUCTURE 31 RESVOR 002 2` 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.66 194.55 11.97 4.65 2584.0 XSECTION 37 REACH .002 2 2... .10_ .0 4.00 24.00 -2.61 191.15 12.07 4.65 2583.5 STRUCTURE 32 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.80 AA- 11.97 1.73 2467.2 STRUCTURE 32 ADDHYD .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.66 190.84 12.05 5.52 2206.5 STRUCTURE 32 RESVOR .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24,00 2.31 191.00 12.02 6.00 2399.1' XSECTION 38 REACH .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.11 187.50 12.12 6.00 2399.0 ? STRUCTURE 33 RUNOFF 002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.87 AA- 11.96 4.56 2663.2 J STRUCTURE 33 ADDHYD .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.02 187.87 12.03 7.50 1785.6 STRUCTURE 33 RESVOR .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.84 IS8.02 12.01 8.08 1924.5 XSECTION 39 REACH .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.83 182.04 12.11 8.08 1924.4 STRUCTURE 36 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.81 .AA- 11.98 1.33 2378.3 STRUCTURE 36 RESVOR .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.82 167.66 11.98 1.33 2375.6 XSECTION 40 REACH .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.76 166.94 12.03 1.33 2374.2 STRUCTURE 35 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.90 AA- 11.95 2.60 2768.7 STRUCTURE 35 ADDHYD .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.85 189.18 11.98 3.55 2363.8 STRUCTURE 35 RESVOR .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.13 189.15 11.98 3.45 2302.3 XSECTION 41 REACH .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.70 185.84 12.08 3.45 2302.1 STRUCTURE 34 RUNOFF .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.08 AA- 11.96 4.11 2738.0 STRUCTURE 34 ADDHYD .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.89 182.6.8 11.98 6.70 2232.1 STRUCTURE 34 RESVOR 003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.04 182.68 12.01 6.67 2222.9 XSECTION 42 REACH 003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.97 178.13 12.11 6.67 2222.6 STRUCTURE 43 ADDHYD .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.89 180.69 12.11 14.75 2048.6 XSECTION 8 REACH .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.92 119.56 12.21 14.75 2048.6 XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.83 .AA- 12.01 16.01 2164,1 XSECTION 2 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.62 147.11 12.06 26.27 2034.0 XSECTION 3 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.12 AA- 11.99 6.00 1618.8 XSECTION 4 REACH .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.11 155.55 12.09 6.00 1318.7 XSECTION 4 RUNOFF .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.28 .4;8- 12.09 7.61 1530.8 XSECTION 4 ADDHYD .008 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.21 155.73 12.09 13.81 1643.9 Y _ TR20 XEO REV 05/02/83 NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 10-03-88 (BLODGETT) JOB 1 SUMMARY PAGE 27 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGPAPH _? A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE '3 STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION AREA # COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) "7 ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 XSECTION 5 REACH .008 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.22 145.73 12.19 13.81 1643.9 XSECTION 2 ADDHYD .022 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.59 147.51 12.10 38.82 1741.0 XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .039 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.96 .AA- 12.15 44.53 1141.9 = XSECTION 5 REACH .039 2 2 - .10- .0 4.00 24.00 -1.96 146.20 12.25 44.53 1141.9 XSECTION 5 ADDHYD .061 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.19 146.51 12.18 75.39 1238.1 STRUCTURE 8 RUNOFF .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.36 AA- 11.97 7.20 1440.3 ti',2o c STRUCTURE 8 RESVOR .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00. 1.39 175.71 12.13 1.98 396.5 X.SECTION 13 REACH .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.39 172.32 12.23 1.98 396.4 XSECTION 46 RUNOFF .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .73 AA- 12.10 1.04 474.3 XSECTION 46 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .66 AA- 12.04 1.25 453.5 7l-� XSECTION 46 ADDHYD .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .69 189.49 12.05 2.35 473.9 XSECTION 44 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.60 AA- 11.97 2.99 2474.9 II-v XSECTION 44 ADDHYD 006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.11 173.91 12.00 5.10 828.1 _ XSECTION 44 RUNOFF .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.17 AA- 11.96 13.97 2851.1 2LcooE:.- XSECTION 44 ADDHYD .011 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.02 182.94 11.97 18.82 1702.0 s XSECTION 45 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.78 .AA- 11.96 2.29 2657.4 1--' XSECTION 45 REACH .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.88 180.10 12.06 2.28 2656.3 XSECTION 44 ADDHYD .012 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.08 183.99 11.97 20.68 1735.1 XSECTION 46 RUNOFF .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.78 .AA-' 11.96 3.89 1853.2 XSECTION 46 REACH .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.66 190.99 12.06 3.89 1852.9 .J XSECTION 44 ADDHYD .014 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.05 185.66 11.98 23.64 1686.1 XSECTION 47 RUNOFF .003 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .70 .4;8- 12.00 1.97 579.7 'L'�' XSECTION 44 ADDHYD .017 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 186.75 11.98 25.57 1467.8 _ XSECTION 44 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.59 .AA- 11.96 2.11 2422.9 3�a�!= _ XSECTION 44 ADDHYD .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.82 187.93 11.98 27.66 1512.1 XSECTION 44 REACH .018 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.84 187.93 12.08 25.66 1512.1'�°o`s��"'" XSECTION 5 RUNOFF .017 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .67 .AA- 12.07 7.31 435.2 STRUCTURE 7 ADDHYD .023 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.74 170.07 12.08 29.54 1268.3 �- STRUCTURE 7 RUNOFF .020 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.42 .AA- 11.96 45.45 2295.4 S� STRUCTURE 7 ADDHYD .043 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.06 189.04 11.99 67.47 1565.8 STRUCTURE 7 ADDHYD 060 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.67 192.19 12.00 7_3.79 / 1232.0 STRUCTURE 7 RES'JOR 060 2 2 .10 .0 4. 00 24. 00 1.67 16.8. 34 12.23 '26. 08` / 435.5 1 os X.SECTION 12 ADDHYD .121 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.93 164.32 12.18 101.9 840. XSECTION 8 REACH .121 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.93 121.05 12.28 101.90 640.8 XSECTION 8 RUNOFF .039 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.73 AA- 12.22 51.65 1331.2 yT XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .160 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.13 121.82 12.26 152.21 951.4 TR20 XEQ NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 10-03-88 (BLODGETT) JOB 1 SUMMARY REV 05/02/83 PAGE 28 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(•) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- IO OPERATION AREA 0 COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) CHR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 "J XSECTION 8 ADDHYD .167 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.16 122.05 12.25 166.59 996.4 STRUCTURE 2 RESVOR .167 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.16 124.49 12.25 166.83 997.9 XSECTION 9 REACH .167 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.16 117.36 12.35 166.83 997.9 STRUCTURE 13 RUNOFF .004 2 2-- .10- .0 4.00 24.00 .49 .88- 11.99 2.05 469.0 STRUCTURE 13 RESUOR .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .50 209.10 12.20 .39 88.0 XSECTION 6 RUNOFF .011 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.14 .88- 12.11 7.58 722.3 XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .95 149.28 12.11 7.97 535.7 XSECTION 6 RUNOFF 029 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.46 Aa- 12.12 27.52 935.9 %1(%IZLIC ,_. XSECTION 6 ADDHYD .044 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.29 157.59 12.11 35.49 801.4 XSECTION 6 REACH .044 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.29 157.59 12.21 35.49 801.4 STRUCTURE 5 RUNOFF .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.93 A8- 12.00 8.86 2272.3 STRUCTURE 5 RESUOR .004 2 2 .10 .-0 4.00 24.00 2.84 169.25 12.06 7.50 1923.1 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .011 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.33 .88- 11.98 30.19 2625.6 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .015 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.20 149.51 11.99 37.26 2419.2 STRUCTURE 4 ADDHYD .060 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.78 152.10 12.08 53.44 895.5 STRUCTURE 4 RESUOR .060 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.79 152.09 12.09 53.22 891.7 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .006 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.28 .88- 11.95 18.88 2950.7 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .066 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.93 151.98 12.01 68.78 1040.9 .3 STRUCTURE 11 RUNOFF .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 .70 E8-' 11.98 2.67 712.5 STRUCTURE it RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.10 .88- 11.95 1.72 2890.2 `j STRUCTURE 11 ADDHYD .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.03 181.94 11.97 4.35 1001.5 STRUCTURE 11 RESUOR .004 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.06 178.35 12.12 1.48 340.0 STRUCTURE 12 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.59 .A8- 11.96 2.46 2525.0 �) STRUCTURE 12 RESVOR .001 .2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 4.83 176.50 .00 6.70 6371.8 YSECTION 14 ADDHYD .005 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.75 166.60 .00 6.70 1259.4 XSECTION 14 RUNOFF .001 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.03 .88- 11.95 3.39 2852.9 XSECTION 14 ADDHYD .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.98 166.60 .00 6.70 1029.2 XSECTION 7 REACH .007 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.14 148.18 .12 6.95 1066.8 XSECTION 7 RUNOFF .010 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.27 .8A- 12.21 6.01 632.8'�O� XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .016 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.62 148.42 12.11 11.20 699.8 XSECTION 7 ADDHYD .082 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.87 152.75 12.02 77.72 946.7 XSECTION 7 REACH .082 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.87 152.75 12.12 77.72 946.7 STRUCTURE 10 RUNOFF .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.04 .88- 11.96 5.30 2759.9 STRUCTURE 10 RESVOR .002 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 3.07 147.11 12.05 3.44 1789.3 YSECTION 7 ADDHYD .084 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.90 153.03 12.12 81.01 964.2 XSECTION 7 REACH .084 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 1.90 153.03 12.22 81.01 964.2 TR20 XEO NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 10-03-88 (BLODGETT) JOB 1 SUMMARY .7 REV 05/02/83 PAGE 29 SUMMARY TABLE 1 - SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ORDER PERFORMED (A STAR(*) AFTER THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) VALUES INDICATES A FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH i A QUESTION MARK(?) INDICATES A HYDROGRAPH WITH PEAK AS LAST POINT.) SECTION/ STANDARD RAIN ANTEC MAIN PRECIPITATION PEAK DISCHARGE '.� STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE TABLE MOIST TIME ------------------------- RUNOFF -------------------------------------- ID OPERATION I AREA $ COND INCREM BEGIN AMOUNT DURATION AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME PATE RATE (SO MI) (HR) (HR) (IN) (HR) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 XSECTION 9 ADDHYD .251 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.07 118.01 12.33 234.56 933.8 STRUCTURE 3 RESVOR .251 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.07 123.72 12.75 101.01 402.1 XSECTION 10 REACH .251 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.07 102.37 12.85 101.01 402.1 XSECTION 10 RUNOFF .059 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 -1.81 .88- 12.09 74.35 1253.8 XSECTION 10 ADDHYD .310 2 2 .10 .0 4.00 24.00 2.02 103.00 12.19 151.32 487.4 7 v H W�N Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont 1�1_ Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT: - DATE: L"v, 1 l', S ..._ - - 1..1V C(,•_: 1. ft N �. ( i �� .,, J_ f 'v P•,I u. I`1 Her �. v o±.�'.f L (r. ✓_�L-(.',i _ IZ(�VI �EJ_ �� ,E..V ufJ \T'd C'kCVL tc(L 1. U v_v-j L,`I Al a� 1 n H WVN Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont 1_ Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT= DATE= 'I 7 V ✓ I I14_ . .i�)(Z.��./�.`AiUV' t�..... I, U•1'. Iv'\; �) �'.t, i�,.i Il .�.� \i�. � •.._t;� 1 ,, +L i.�r.,✓.^•y(l r�.�`.+:v .....,. � (,� A.,l F Lid• ;� I F 3 ?( 1 IJC. 3 A ,_...... AICx�: Imo" 6 L�•( 11 j UNGf-.IZ �Vt}lL�c:lirLL".. l v ti L j �. O C C .hr� �- JA 1_a, H W N Wagner, Heindel , and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington. Vermont O Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT:' DATE:- r` H ;VN Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont 1-�-- i ! I i d/2�/ -- -- ------ - ��-- UU----114 — 7- - O.4Z C-c, 0 Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT= DATE: I ' S= Grassed _ Waterway =_Section 9 T I .I f o F e ' j I o.y4 i LA, i Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermon' Page No. PAGE .�_ OF Jr PROJECT .lame","Irf/3�Al-' //.7/oclf.tr DATE: ZZ I %afa/ ..¢rC& : 1?.r 74/7l,l z = /377 l i )Ct r = o.Q0e-1,7 Soi jr,� ���f�l Use �rra (FfL) C �U .4ru-, n: 6,.0 C�aGG 12A61Cc/ (/6/' /l i �I �/e'/ Z—C'is -/-A 10• //Z F Gel 6y� /aw ?rj;'C SC--Ct SlIee t -�-_"-- J 7P-1C 0-i CD%7 �i. it%ti 1•"JG �"/ L� t 2.7 G.BJ" �o .3./ 15-3 %7,4/ /1H-,c= Z46' SPc p.Cl wz hrs_ H �/�N Wagner, Heindel , and Noyes, Inc, Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont M PAGE L OF Page No. S PROJECT: 21"/>r/7r2t/CZ /�•>r DATE: rrl;lZ 70- /S; /Z ii, z = �/,ZCTS-G/ Z = 0.000 7 �•,i z U jJGved 112 /6 fv�,�6 food c A ,2I/zcs- 6 IQ - er�th /ori Ty/tee E/eva��oN %.T/o/tee /ou.2om TiN,r //4� GUaiP� G/a� 2 /, 7 / 6 /Z 7-1,-•, e = c. O. 0 96 /rs, H WVN Wagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. Consulting Geologists Burlington, Vermont /J fJ* �F �l-�/0 9 Gooc/ f// --�Od , "01 Page No. PAGE OF PROJECT Ale I`/e' Bic1' 1,1 ell DATE: `7 X-YC,,v ,/..;"-o&6y C / _ J l /Ow 7y�E'' Q F/Fv. °S��j�£ /Cc•�C' //� 0.6/ U?Z W o lc" -Gv n 'kc /_;/vr /",c %O%=/ /i•"-,C = 0�;6- -snc- Nagner, Heindel , and Noyes, Inc ;onsulting Geologists Burlington, Vermor �)/✓� � r s/JC. f � aoo ch /Z 77 / `t q Z. 2/L4-IP /'3d 7 �A = S73s-y (3 Page No. PAGE `� OF PROJECT:f2Gr>/f'> 612C /S/o-11rr rt DATE' 9/Z 2 CX/ I 1 4c.v r(& /ZS,�/j� �o .2/S, 36C) .'3Uq % ;7S�53 i3 NACU i/N070� tA /'/Oc.� 7y/�e 4 F_/e�_ - ho 12 /vc Z-Im c- - ' SA&t)f N/ow ems- �. i r y 6s /o7�G/ %if=,C LOW -Sec. = Q, OS' / h"X, H �VN Nagner, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc ,onsulting Geologists Burlington, Vermor E Page No. PAGE 1-OF f PROJECT-j:�a'"'��" DATE:— !/Z f o. oo.7e/ .•',- J z 6' A7 .Zj ��1 r-0 !1 ,Uave� t -Iqy %� 45�,/9/z �pG G 4 'IdSlel., Ralc Z 7_? 36i1 ' (,clot to r- lva l � ' 6 % ,2 , � /� o sec-_ 15, LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TP-20 HYDROLOGY****************** JOB TR-20 NOPLOTS TITLE 002 NORTH BROOK LAST REVISED 10-03-88 (BLODGETT) 2 XSECTN 001 1.0 171.5 8 170. 0.0 0.0 8 170.15 0.24 0.09 8 170.45 2.17 0.48 w 8 170.90 5.69 0.88 8 171.05 9.53 1.33 + 8 171.2 11.17 1.52 k' 8 171.35 12.07 1.68 tl 8 171.5 12.08 1.77 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 002 1.0 146:5 145. 0. 0 0. 0 8 145.15 0.24 0.09 2 145.45 2.17 8 145.90 5.69 0.88 e 146.05 9.53 1.33 8 146.2 11.17 1.52 8 146.35 12.07 1.68 e 146.5 12.08 1.77 8 146.8 20.0 1.78 9 ENDTBL " 2 XSECTN 003 1.0 160.0 8 158. 0.0 0.0 158.2 0.36 0.16 8 158.6 3.30 .85 _ s! 8 159.0 8.66 1.57 8 159.4 14.54 2.36 8 159.6 17.00 2.70 8 159.8 18.36 2.98 8 160.0 18.37 3.14 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 004 1.0 157. 8 155. 0.0 0.0 8 155.5 4.00 1.58 8 156. 25.19 6.25 8 156.5 74.04 14.03 8 157. 161.84 25.30 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 005 1.0 147. 8 145. 0. 0 0. 0 8 145.5 4.00 1.58 8 146. 25.19 6.25 8 146.5 74.04 14.03 8 147. 161.84 25.30 LIST OF INPUT DATA (CONTINUED)********************** 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 01 9 ENDTBL ' 2 XSECTN 006 1.0 155.8 8 147.8 0.0 0.0 8 148.8 4.3 1.57 8 149.8 12.0 3.14 8 150.8 16.0 3.15 3 151.8 20.0 3.16 8 153.8 26.0 3.17 8 155.8 31.0 3.18 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 007 1.0 150.1 8 147.4 0.0 0.0 e 147.7 0.92 0.25 148.3 8.45 1.33 8 148.9 22.23 2.46 8 149.5 37.13 3.68 8 149.8 43.54 4.22 8 150.1 47.02 4.66 ENDTBL �9 2 XSECTN 008 1.0 121.25 8 119. 0.0 0.0 8 119.25 3.94 2.00 8 119.50 12.00 4.00 8 119.75 22.71 6.00 8 120.0 35.39 8. 00 8 120.25 49.64 10.00 120.5 65.64 12.00 8 121.0 98.69 16.7E 8 121.25 114.93 19.G0 9 EtJDTBL 2 XSECTN 009 1.0 119.0 8 113. 0.0 0.0 8 113.5 0.51 0.25 8 113.75 1.50 0.56 114. 3.23 1.00 8 114.5 9.49 2.25 8 115.0 20.39 4.000 8 116.0 56.96 9.00 8 117.0 128.89 16.00 8 118.0 233.0 25.00 8 119.0 378.0 36.00 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 010 1.0 104. 3 100. 0.0 0.0 M w M r, 0 w J M o o G D Z O Li100Oe-1000 00000 n rl 000 O - NnLss n • • • • •.-Io\74:) -Onr-I` m0 4LINNM c)\tw,Nn •-+o`7on_ oo.-1'D F- n.11 q \t Co . . . . nMp• DMOj `D.D •\1us "•7M o . . . . .Gor_, Z M LSN NU%00M O . . O CYLSD OD M 0000 ' 0 .-+ .-+ 1-1 o N rl Ls� n 00 p` O" o r-q \7 N .-4 rJ 1-1 O o 0 a Q 0 Onoo. 0OOOOOOO 10F% o.7M00 F- OMM `DNISsMT •OO`Mn'-D •ram • • • • • • • . .0 M . . •C:)0,mN `ci •n`DLS% J D0 1+1 M 0` 00 . \1 Lr, N '-1 M O` G Co (`� I�t 0 a-1 0 • t7 M `D OD • 4 IS• N \1 G • • •00r-IM `DO 'DON'-7LS"LSN Not n00p` nONri I'D'IT J) ct • . . . NUNN Z nvnLnriLipMa, .-'1 \7LINC,4rq .-+ N 1-4 \ru%Nr-1 N`D riM`D .-sM'D w O ts� n u% 11 W, UN UN U% UN is% LSD UN O Ul. M n U% O Lfti U� \1 N J O-Ia-iNNMM4 ID 10NNkm CoOn- [hD1,GorINM NNNM`T `D`Dnn00 oOc-1N GOGOoOoO o`D`D`D`0 NO U%U%UNLi%`D`D`D \0-3 f•.NNNr\ o.D cj D'D.D CANNN G rA e-4 r-1 a-i e-i 1-4 r-I c-i . 4 r,l e A r-1 rl O r-1 14 -4 .-4 14 1-1 11 1-4 r-1 1, 1-1 r-1 14 -1 ri • r-q e A e-1 e-i e A V4 14 ri -4 Oct ri r-1 ri ri O a >w CV * o * e i N M \7 - 11t -4 1-4 Y O G G O * JZ JZ JZ JZ JF- M w F- oG F- w F- co F- OCi u * F- U F- u F- U F- U F- Z * LAW 0w aw Ow Oaf * Zui zui z(i Ui zF- * wx wx wx wx wU) * pj00m0:1IMOD r100rr.CJp]Nm CC, 030, 04p7U3O WWrX, 00MWG- NMMM-DMWOl LN 100 Oj CO (D M- 0,MpjO?MCo I� a LIST OF INPUT DATA 8 122.8 113.26 0.01E 8 123.2 132.81 0. 022 i 8 123.6 143.47 0.023 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 03 8 113. 0.0 0.0 8 113.35 1.93 0.00003 I1 8 114.05 18.00 0.005 2 114.75 47.48 0.165 8 115.45 75.97 0.308 8 115.80 93.30 0.503 8 116.15 100.79 0.7000 *' 8 116.50 100.8-0 0.896 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 04 8 147.0 0.0 0.0 8 150.0 8.7 0.033 ' 8 151. 0 10. 1 Cl. C17 8 152.0 11.: 0.14 8 152.2 100.0 0.i9 3 ENDTBL STRUCT 05 8 167.0 0.0 0.0 ` 9 168.0 5.0 0.0023 8 169.0 ?.1 0.0138 8 170.0 9.7 0.0600 8 171.0 10.1 0.2743 - 8 171.5 510.0 0.2744 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 06 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 07 8 165. 0 0. 0 0. 0 �V 8 165 . 5 7.4 0.178 �� 8 186.0 11.9 0.356 8 167.0 18.6 0.744 �'-�' k0/5.�s 8 168.0 25.4 1.196 j 8 168.5 26.4 1.455 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 08 8 173.0 0.0 0.0 8 174.0 1.0 0.005 8 174.5 1.4 0.014 8 175.0 1.6c 0.033 8 175.5 1.9 0.070 8 176.0 2.1 0.127 It ' 'j LIST OF INPUT DATAcI:�ONTIFIUED7********************** 8 176.E 2.2 0.202 8 177.0 4.0 0.203 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 10 8 145.0 0.0 0.0 8 145.5 0.087 0.00748 8 146.0 0.123 0.01913 8 146.5 2.43 0.03492 8 147.0 3.31 0.05466 i 8 147.5 3.89 0.07894 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 11 8 176.5 0.0 0.00918 8 177. 0.7 0.02066 8 177.5 1.0 0.03444 8 178. 1.2 0.05280 8 178.25 1.4 0.06198 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 12 8 173.25 0.0 0.01263 8 173.75 1.2 0.02755 a 174. 1.. 0.03673 Et JDTBL 3 STRUCT 13 8 206.5 0.0 0.0 8 207.0 0.163 0.00119 8 207.5 0.239 0.00344 - 8 208.0 0.293 0.00677 8 208.5 0.340 0.01182 8 209.0 0.378 0.01882 j 8 209.5 0.416 0.02743 8 210.0 0.449 0.03419 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 20 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 31 8 188.0 0.0 0.0 8 189.0 1.0, 0.00009 8 190.0 1.5 0.00018 8 191.0 2.0 0.00028 8 192.0 2.2 0.00037 8 193.0 2.5 0.00046 8 194.0 3.0 0.00174 8 195.0 6.0 0.00175 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 32 'i ;�a I ao LIST OF INPUT DATA(CONTIf4UED)********************** S 184.0 0.0 0.0 1 8 185.0 1.0 0.00009 8 186.0 1.5 0.00018 8 187.0 2.0 0.00028 8 188.0 2.2 0.00037 8 189.0 2.5 0.00046 8 190.0 3.0 0.00275 8 191.0 6.0 0.00276 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 33 8 177.5 0.0 0.0 8 185. 3.7, 0.00069 8 186. +. 0.00344 8 187.0 4.2 0.00459 8 188.0 8.0 0.00460 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 34 8 174.0 0.0 0.0 8 179. 2.5 0.00046 e 180. 3. 0.00096 a 182. 3.9 0.02163 e 183. 8.0 0.02164 `.r'. 9 ENDTBL STRUCT 35 183.0 0.0 0.0 2. 184.0 1.0 0.00009 8 185.0 1.5 0.00018 8 186.0 2.0 0.00028 8 187.0 2.'2 0.00037 8 188.0 2.5 0.00046 ,I 2 189.0 3.0 0.00161 j 8 190.0 6.0 0.00162 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 36 s 186.0 0.0 0.0 E 187.0 1.0 0.00009 8 188.0 1.5 0.00018 8 189.0 2.0 0.00028 8 190.0 2.2 0.00037 8 191.0 2.5 0.00046 8 192.0 3.0 0.00161 8 193.0 6.0 0.00162 9 ENDTBL 3 STRUCT 43 8 173.7 0.0 0.0 8 175.0 3.9 0.0ii037 :k Co QoCW OJ co rJ 14D c0 co Co co co co Co N,0 co co co W Go co CO r1 0 co Co QO c4 OD co Co rJ •U co fA co ro co co co PI) I'D io i0130 xm xm xm xm xm co z C4 z U1 z UJ z U7 z mo mo mo mo mo n-i n--i n-i n--4 n-i --i rp —I rip --i ro -a w —I co z r- z r- z r- z r- z r G O O a O . 4. A W W W k N o 00 V :k �k k w OD CD r-+ I co r��-+F-+N�• r�r�r���-+r-•N �Nr-+r-'r��'� �--s���+�'�r�• N►-�Nr+r-�r-+r-� F-+Nr-+ o CO00coo000o corocoro00coco0 c00oCo V `J V \lo commNCOwm 10101.00Oowm Ili \JV IM W W \0w07 \J\!TT ►.-aa,0 •Oc0\1 \JTO,\n\n L.4\ oO'ONo00co co\JT r' C) W G o7 0 "'n 'Cr, C)W C, * 0 to T G W C) ",4 l \nOr at W o flo Ii CD WA o \J "n 1,3 Cfl o W w V O W W \ CD v W VOW l4 \1Ot4 W —I O T N Iv i-• r-+ N F+ T N N F-j 1-A FA F-� Co z pco OCO pCO O[O p�0 rJO• '0 W COIN• �n OCO WOD j,1J OD aCOWOO fi,N o oCAWCOi�N T aQOWOD j,N o o C G a o a C) • O. o a G a 0 'D G o 0 a 0 - G o G a G G a o 0 0 a o 1-' `il --I T T T T T D D n 00o O 0 0 o G o O p p Co 0 0 o G o a o Co o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 •- Z W t•1 W W W W W W W W l l W W W W kA t,4 %14 t�1 W W W W W W ld W t�l C:) CD C) -� tiSl \n Vl •.n O 'In •.n to I'D CFI '.n O ,n `il .fl "n %J1 O \n ,n 0 F' O z W N fi k,4 t j ld N M-° Jl W PJ J\ '\A %,n OD W m k �k :k M k 1 zz Fl LIST OF INIPUT DATA (CCNTIh4UEC))********************** 8 185.67 2.80 0.354 186.5 6.00 0.355 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 042 1.0 176.67 8 174.0 0.0 0.0 j 8 174.83 1.20 0.35 8 175.0 1.40 0.351 8 175.33 1.80 0.352 ,3 176.00 2.30 0.353 8 176.67 2.80 0.354 8 177.5 5.00 0.355 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 044 1.0 162.3 8 173.0 0.0 0.0 174.0 5.6 1.57 8 175.0 8.2 .3.141 8 177.0 11.7 3.142 8 179.0 14.3 3.143 8 181.0 15.4 3.144 �i 8 182.3 17.7 3.145 9 ENDTBL }2 XSECTN 045 1.0 184.0 Ja 178.9 0.0 0.0 'k r, 179.5 1.6 0.614 8 180.2 2.4 1.227 8 181.2 3.2 1.228 8 182.2 3.8 1.229-- 183.2 4.4 1.230 { 8 184.0 4.8 1.231 '9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 046 1.0 194.0 8 188.5 0.0 0.0 I 8 189.3 2.1 0.884 S 190.0 3.01 1.767 8 191.0 3.9 1.768 8 192.0 4.6 1.769 8 193.0 5.2 1.770 8 194.0 5.8 1.771 9 ENDTBL 2 XSECTN 047 1.0 192.0 8 190.0 0.0 0.0 8 190.38 1.45 0.44 8 190.75 8.84 1.55 8 191.5 39.4 4.42 8 192.0 152.8 12.37 9 ENDTBL 213 LIST OF INPUT DATA(COh4TIt4iJED)********************** 6 RUNOFF 1 20 7 0.0065 89. 0.20 1 j 6 REACH 3 002 7 1 1300. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 31 7 0.0018 87. 0.077 1 6 RESVOR 2 31 7 3 188.0 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 037 3 4 125. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 32 7 0.0007 89. 0.12 1 6 ADDH`r'D 4 32 7 4 6 1 6 RESVOR 2 32 6 3 184.0 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 038 3 4 300. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 33 7 0.0017 90. 0.081 1 6 ADDHYD 4 33 7 4 6 1 6 RESVOR 2 33 6 3 177.5 1 1 1 ' 6 REACH 3 039 3 2 40. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 36 7 0.00056 89. 0.14 1. 6 RESVOR 2 36 3 186. 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 040 3 4 180. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 35 7 0.00094 90. 0.0-41 1 6 ADDHYD 4 3F 7 4 6 1 6 RESVOR 2 35 6 3 183. 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 041 3 4 200. 1 6 )6 RUNOFF ADDHYD 1 4 34 34 7 4 7 6 0.0015 ?2. 0.098 1 1 6 RESVOR 2 34 6 3 174. 1 1 1 : 6 REACH 3 042 3 4 50. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 43 4 2 6 1 6 REACH 3 008 6 3 700. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 002 7 0.0074 8'?. 0.'20 1 6 ADDHYD 4 002 7 1 2 1 6 RUNOFF 1 003 6 0.0033 0.15 1 6 REACH 3 004 6 4 400. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 004 6 0.0051 83. 0.32 1 6 ADDHYD 4 004 4 6 7 1 6 REACH 3 005 7 4 250. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 002 2 4 7 1 6 RUNOFF 1 001 6 0.0390 79. 0.42 1 6 REACH 3 005 6 5 1100. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 005 5 7 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 08 2 0.0050 70.7 0.056 1 1 1 6 RESVOR 2 08 2 7 173. 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 013 7 4 460. 1 1 1 { 6 RUNOFF 1 046 2 0. 0022 59.4 0.184 tl.oc-6-T -3 1 6 RUNOFF 1 046 5 0.00275 58. 0.167 7-(30 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 046 2 5 7 1 6 RUNOFF 1 044 6 0.00121 89. 0.117 6 ADDHYD 4 044 7 6 2 1 6 RUNOFF 1 044 6 0. 0049 93. 0. 082 z� LIST OF 111PUT DATA (CONTINUED)********************** 6 ADDHYD 4 044 2 6 7 1 6 RUNOFF 1 045 2 0.00086 89. 0.067 'U 1 6 REACH 3 045 2 5 260. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 044 5 7 2 1 6 RUNOFF 1 046 5 0. 0021 76.8 0 . 057 6- C> 'r - `t 1 6 REACH 3 046 5 7 515. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 044 2 7 5 1 6 RUNOFF 1 047 6 0.0034 58.8 0. 11.2 6 ADDHYD 4 044 5 6 2 1 6 RUNOFF 1 044 6 0.00087 86.9 0.096 3Loo(Q Z 1 6 ADDHYD 4 044 6 2 5 1 6 REACH 3 044 5 7 410. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 005 2 0.0168 58. 0.19 AU 1 6 ADDHYD 4 07 4 7 6 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 07 5 0.0198 ,R1. 0.0955 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 07 6 5 4 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 07 4 2 7 1, 1 1 6 RESUOR 2 07 7 5 165.0 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 012 5 1 2 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 008 2 4 1300. 1 �c, RUNOFF 1 008 7 0.0388 88. 0.56 1 6 ADDHYD 4 008 4 7 2 1 6 ADDHYD 4 008 2 3 6 1 6 RESUOR 2 02 6 3 120.0 1 6 REACH 3 009 3 6 400.0 1 6 RUNOFF 1 13 2 0.00438 54.0 0.043 1 6 RESUOR 2 13 2 7 206.5 1 6 RUNOFF 1 006 3 0.0105 61.0 0.32 1 1 1. 6 ADDHYD 4 006 7 3 4 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 006 2 0.0294 72.0 0.34 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 006 2 4 3 1 1 1 6 REACH 3 006 3 5 800.0 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 05 7 0.0039 90. 0.164 1 6 RESUOR 2 05 7 4 167.0 1 ') 6 RUNOFF 1 007 3 0.0115 94, 0.15 1 1 1 6 ADDH''r'D 4 007 3 4 7 1 6 ADDHYD 4 04 7 5 4 1 6 RESUOR 2 04 4 2 147.0 1 6 RUNOFF 1 007 3 0.0064 94. 0.063 1 6 ADDH"(D 4 007 2 3 7 1 1 1 6 RUNOFF 1 11 2 0.00375 59. 0.0584 1 6 RUNOFF 1 11 3 0.000595 92. 0.02"Z'9 1 6 ADDHYD 4 11 2 3 4 1 6 RESUOR 2 11 4 2 176.5 1 6 RUNOFF 1 12 3 0.000975 87. 0.0675 1 6 RESUOR 2 12 3 5 176.5 1 LIST OF IMPUT DATA (CONTINUED)********************** 6 ADDHYD 4 014 2 5 3 1 6 RUNOFF 1 014 4 0.00119 91. 0.00868 1 6 ADDHYD 4 014 3 4 5 1 6 REACH 3 007 5 4 300. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 007 3 0.0095 69. 0.4,38 1 6 ADDHYD 4 007 4 3 2 1 6 ADDHYD 4 007 2 7 3 1 'I 6 REACH 3 007 3 4 300. 1 6 RUNOFF 1 10 3 0.00192 91.7 0.033 1 6 RESVOR 2 10 3 5 145.0 1 1 1 6 ADDHYD 4 007 4 5 2 1 G; 6 REACH 3 007 2 4 900. 1 6 ADDHYD 4 009 4 6 7 1 1 1 6 RESUOR 2 03 7 4 113.0 1 6 REACH 3 010 4 6 600.0 1 6 RUNOFF 1 010 2 0.0593 77. 0.30 1 6 ADDHYD 4 010 2 6 5 1 1 1 ENDATA 7 LASFLO 5 0.01 7 INCREM 6 0.10 yCOMPUT 7 20 010 4.0 1.0 2 2 01 01 ! ENDCMP 1 t ENDJOB 2 OF 80-80 LIST***{**************************** Memorandum July 14, 1987 Page 2 9. Upon completion of the bituminous concrete base course, street name signs and traffic control signs such as stop signs shall be installed by the contractor. Location of these signs will be approved by the City 10. There is an existing force main serving Ridgewood along the eastside end of Dorset Street from the overpass to Kennedy Drive. This is not shown on the plans. 11. Typed specifications shall include a section on filling or make reference to Vermont State Highway specifications. 12. Paving thicknesses shall be 2 inch -base oourse and one inch surface course for a total of 3 inches, plans shows 2 1/2 inches. 13. On page 20, the typical road cross section delete the mote regarding the reduction of the road base thickness. 14. City Water Department shall review the watermain design. 15. Water main fillings shall be covered with plastic prior to pouring thrust blocks. 16. There should be a typical road cross section at the cul-de- sacs showing pavement slope. 17. Condominium areas should have a parking area for boats, trailers, mobil homes. 4) PALCO LTD., 4050 WILLISTON ROAD 1. A 10 foot separation between the proposed sewer force main and watermain must be maintained. To do this an easement from the property to the west will have to be obtained. 6) BLODGETT DEVELOPMENTL SHELBURNE ROAD 1. The sidewalk along Holmes Road extension shall be constructed one foot off the street right-of-way line. Water main shall be within the grass strip between the curb and sidewalk. Sidewalk should continue across the entrance drive and terminate where street terminates. 2. Water, sewer, and drainage line shall extend beyond the paved road surface and capped. They shall be designed so that they can be extended easterly. 2 Memorandum July 10, 1987 Page 3 3. A gravel surface turnaround should be constructed at end of street. 4. Road should be constructed to City standards to at least the dead end. Road plans and profiles shall be submitted for review. 7) DORSET SQUARE ANNEX, DORSET STREET 1. Dorset Street plans call for the Anchorage Motel to have an access from Corporate Way. If possible the entrance to this project should be opposite. This should-be-rlooked into. 2. If the parking lot were connected it would give vehicles an alternate way to travel especially to go east to Hinesburg Road, when it is completed, instead of entering Dorset Street. 3 July 13, 1987 KP MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Dennis Blodgett to construct a 30,000 square foot building for office and retail use as depicted on a plan entitled, "Blodgett Development, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont", dated June 30, 1987, with the following stipulations: 1. The two existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road shall be closed. 2. The 4-phase traffic signal shall be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. 3. -A revised landscaping plan showing additional landscaping recommended by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner, and a landscaping bond voc tat shall be posted prior to permit. V 4. A sewer allocation of 1650 gallons per day shall be made and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 5. The sidewalk along Holmes Road extension shall be constructed one foot off the street right-of-way line. Water main shall be within the grass strip between the curb and sidewalk. Sidewalk shall continue across the entrance drive and terminate where street terminates. 6. Water, sewer, and drainage line shall extend beyond the paved road surface and capped. They shall be designed so that they can be extended easterly. 7. A gravel surface turnaround shall be constructed at end of street. 8. The new Road shall be constructed to City standards to at least the dead end. Road plans and profiles shall be submitted for review. f 9. Two hydrants shall be provided by the applicant bey the Fire Department. 10. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. tom.. T-�.a.�- s��a�CC�C �— .,��:.�.-►�c,.,�� a� o� �...��/ 6/23/87 KP MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve/deny the site plan application of Dennis Blodgett to construct a 37,500 square foot building for office use at 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road as depicted on a plan entitled, "Site Plan, Blodgett Development, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Wiemann- Lamphere, Architects, Inc., dated May 29, 1987 with the following stipulations/for the following reasons. Stipulations: 1) Existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road shall be closed. 2) Holmes Road extension should dead end beyond entrance drive and the development entrance shall tee into it. The new street shall include curbs, sidewalk, and shall be centered within the planned right-of-way. 3) The applicant shall provide a sidewalk along Shelburne Road. 4) The site shall include storm water run off control measures. A drainage and erosion control study shall be conducted by Heindel & Noyes and their recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Engineer, then followed. 5) The 4 phase traffic signal must be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. 6) A landscaping bond of $ shall be posted prior to permit. 7) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. 8) 2 fire hydrants are required on the site to be placed by the South Burlington Fire Department. Reason: This development exceeds the traffic overlay. 1 Memorandum June 23, 1987 Page 3 driveway. Also, in the center island I would suggest planting one or two salt tolerant evergeeen. The azaleasproposed for the island can be planted beneath these trees and the yews I would place around the entrance. An additional $1300.00 worth of landscaping would cover two more 2-1/2 to 3" more norway maples, two 6 - 7 foot austrian pines and one 5 - 6 foot flowering crab. A landscaping bond of $4350.00 shall be posted prior to permit. 4) DENNIS BLODGETT, 1340 - 1342 SHELBURNE ROAD Mr. Blodgett proposes to construct a 37,500 square foot building for office use. The front part of this lot, is which this building is proposed, is approximately 2.6 acres and is zoned C- 1. The rest of Blodgett's lot is zoned R-4. Offices are a permitted use in the C-1 zone. Total coverage is approximately 55%. Building coverage is approximately 12%. Mr. Blodgett is scheduled to apply to the Zoning Board to receive a Conditional Use approval to move the C-1 District line 50 feet back into the R-4 property as per Section 22.007 of the ordinance. Access: A single access road 32 feet in width is shown off Shelburne Road directly opposite from Holmes Road. Two existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road will be closed. The new road is within the 80 foot r.o.w. Circulation: A 24 foot wide circulation drive is shown around the entire perimeter of the building and is adjacent if approved by Fire Chief Goddette. Parking: 150 spaces are required for office use in this proposed building. 150 spaces are shown. 22 of these spaces are within the proposed 50 foot extension of the C-1 zone into the R-4 zone. 'Traffic: This lot is in traffic overlay zone 4. The maximum permitted trip ends for this 2.8 acre commercial lot is 91. According to limited ITE data 106 trip ends will be generated by this use during peak traffic on Shelburne Road. I informed Mr. Blodgett that this project would exceed the overlay. He plans to revise the building size to comply with the traffic overlay. Revised plans will be available at the meeting. If this project is approved, the 4 phase traffic signal must be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. Landscaping: $23,500 worth of new landscaping is required for this proposed development, $5700.00 worth is shown. I will have landscaping recommendations at the meeting. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. -3- 4. That all of the operations be approved and monitored by the City Engineer. This was seconded by Mr. King and all voted aye. There was some discussion regarding the runway for the Airport and the slope.. Mr. Graf asked how is that property going to be used and Mr. Boutin said he had no specific plans - he has a 5 year plan to fill it. There was more discussion regarding the stream and how much land would be created there, the property lines, etc. Mr. Dinklage moved that the appeal be approved per the stipulations. This was seconded by Mr. King and all voted aye. The appeal was unanimously approved -per stipulations. No. 3 Anneal of Dennis L. Blodgett Appeal of Dennis L. Blodgett seeking approval from Section 22.00 Interpretation of district boundaries sub section 22.007. Request is for permission to extend a district line (Commercial 1) in an easterly direction a maximum of 50 feet into a residential district and use land for additional parking and landscaping, also requesting approval from Section 19.65 Multiple use, occupying a proposed structure with 17,000 square -feet retail area and 17,000 square feet office area, located at 1340 Shelburne Road. Mr. Ward said Section 22.00 interpretation of district boundaries - sub section 22.007 Under conditional use allows Zoning Board to extend district line a maximum of 50 feet. Proposed extension of district line in easterly direction into R-4 District for use as parking and landscaped area. Section 19.65 Multiple use. Proposed building 50' x 100' - two stories in three phases of equal size (foot print 15,000 square feet). Proposed use office and retail. Mr. Jim Lamphere explained the project and said we are allowed to build about 30,000 feet of office space. Would like to make 5000' retail. The Conditional use is because we are reducing the size of the building because of the traffic overlay. This will not change the character of the area. Mr. Dinklage asked if Mr. Blodget owned all of the area and Mr. Blodgettt said he did - approximately 7 1/2 acres zoned R-4. Mr. Graf asked if there would be a traffic light on that corner and Mr. Lamphere replied there will be. Mr. Graf asked how many curb cuts there would be and Mr. Lamphere said the cuts will be coming in off the Holmes Road Extension. Mr. Dinklage said may the records show what is shown here - 9 Holmes Road Extension meets City standards as a street. Mr. Blais said you will willingly convey the street as a City street and Mr. Blodgett said that is what the plans are and they will help reimburse for the first 200' of that road. -4- Mr. Dinklage said let the records show that there will be nothing in the development that will impede the Holmes Road Extension - you do agree with that. Mr. Blodgett said yes, I do agree. Mr. Thibault asked are you putting in sidewalks in on Shelburne Road and Holmes Road Extension and Mr. Blodgett said yes, it is required. We will have landscaping which will hide most of the parking lot. Mr. Graf said I move that if approved that any retail uses of the property will have to go before the Board before being executed. Mr. Thibault seconded the motion. Mr. Blais explained this move to Mr. Blodgett and after some discussion Mr. Graf said I withdraw the stipulation. Mr. Thibault also withdrew his second. The appeal was granted unanimously. No 4 Appeal'of William Savage and Edward Grimley Appeal of William Savage and Edward Grimley seeking a variance from Section 19.65 Multiple uses (sub section 19,.651) and Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements. Request is for permission to remove an existing structure and construct a 28' x 64' two story office complex in conjunction with another existing office complex, also requiring a rear yard variance, structure to be located to within twenty-five (25) feet on a lof containing 40,000 square feet, at 69 Swift Street. Mr. Ward said the area is zoned C-1 District. Section 19.65 multiple use - proposed 28' x 64' two story office complex - remove existing garage. Existing structure two story building (converted residential unit) used for office. Variance granted 6/10/85 for 14' x 42' addition to garage - variance has expired. Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements - minimum rear yard 30 feet - proposed 20 feet. Uses proposed offices and service type establishments - existing Kelly sign and Bench Mark Construction. Mr. Savage said that instead of using existing garage we would like to take that down and put on an addition as shown on the prints. Mr. Dinklage said the plans as shown to us showing 20' are incorrect - the appealant is asking for 26'. Mr. Dinklage asked why do you need any rear yard variance and Mr. Savage said because the lot has a slope to it. Mr. King asked is that uses of your expanded businesses now. Mr. Savage said the businesses there now are Bench Mark Construction, Vermont Gas, a Real Estate office and a Sign Shop. Mr. Dinklage said it's an existing use that's changing. Two sections already exist. There was some discussion regarding moving the building into the parking lot, the rear yard setback, etc. Mr. Grimley said there is probably a misunderstanding and Mr. Savage said we are withdrawing our request for the rear yard setback. City of South Bui•lir>,to« 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 September 23, 1987 Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Blodgett: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Jam. &RUdL Jane B . Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 August 20, 1987 Mr. Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Blodgett Development, Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Blodgett: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes of the July 21, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Please be sure to comply with the stipulations including revised plans and the dedication of the right of way. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleuri, City Planner JBL/mcp 1 Encl cc: Gary Lavigne V City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 4, 1987 Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance Rompany 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1340 - 42 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Blodgett: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes from the July 14, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Some corrections to these minutes were made at the July 28, 1987 meeting. If these amendments to the minutes involve your application, you will receive a copy of the corrections. If you have any questions please call me at 658-7958. KLP/mcp Encl cc: Gary l,avi gne Sincerely, Kathryn L. Perkins, Acting City Planner PLANNER 658-7955 City of South B i r rlington 575 DORSET S r 11EET SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vf I WONT 05401 July 1 '/ , 1987 Mr. Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington,Vermont 05403 Re: 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Blodgett, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my commf�jtts to the Planning Commission regarding your plan. pl,,ttse be sure someone is present on July 21, 1987 to represet,( your application. S /ince, 1'lyt �(/'12, I�T Y Kathr ,vit L . Perkins, .�,ctirtp City Planner KLP/mcp Encls cc: Gary Lavigne A G E N D A South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont SPECIAL MEETING @7:30 P.M. Tuesday, Jul 21,_ 1987 1) Continue review of site plan application of Dennis Blodgett to construct a 30,000 square foot building for office and retail use at 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road. 2) Other business: Respectfully submitted, I l Kathryn Perkins, Acting Planner M c M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Panning Commission From: Kathryn Perkins, Ar-ting Planner Re: Dennis Blodgett, 1:40 - 1342 Shelburne Road Date: July 17, 1987 1) DENNIS BLODGETT, 1340 - 1342 SHELBURNk ROAD Last week we reviewed ^'r. Blodgett's site plan, and found discrepancies with the l:t boundaries. Since then it has been determined by Dick Hard Steve Stitzel, and Mr. Blodgett's attorney that the parcel is one lot spii1, by the C1 and R4 zone lines. Therefore, my original c._iculations were correct based on, a 2.8 acre lot of existing C land, plus the land in the 50 foot extension of the C1 Distr_ct granted by the Zoning Board. The applicant has agree=d to make an offer of irrevocable dedication to the City t.r the r.o.w. for the east -west Holmes Road extension from Shelh)_rne Road to Green Mountain Drive. 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 July 14, 1987 Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Dear Mr. Blodgett: Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission regarding your plan. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 14, 1987 to represent your application. Sincerely, Kathryn Perkins, Acting Planner KP/mcp Encls cc: Gary Lavigne � GNU a,,,- - �� _��. a�d 0 §�aut4 Nurlingtun Nire Department 575 Dorset —*treet —*nuth iN urlingtnn, Igermnnt B5481 1 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658-7960 MEMORANDUM TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF,GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY JULY 14,1987 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: JULY 7,1987 1. DORSET SQUARE ANNEX 142 DQRSET STREET PROPOSED ADDITION: At this time i do not see a problem with this project. 2. PALMER HEIGHTS 40SO WILLISTON ROAD ADDITION: PLANS REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT FEEL THERE IS PROPER ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT TO THE BUILDING FOR SETTING UP. THE LAY OUT OF THE BUILDING AND PARKING WOULD BE A PROBLEM IN GETTING EQUIPMENT IN AND SET UP. 3. OFFICE BUILDING AT 408 Shelburne road PROBLEM WITH THE MAIN ROADS GOING INTO THE PROPERTY BY THE BUILDINGS AGAIN TRYING TO SET UP EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. 4. BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT SHELBURNE ROAD ONLY PROBLEM I SEE AT THIS TIME IS FOR THE SIZE OF THE PROJECT AT LEAST TWO HYDRANTS IS NEEDED FOR FIRE PROTECTION. S. AU INVESTIMENTS SOUTHSETT PROJECT. THE ONLY THING WE NEED FOR THE FIRE DEPT. is 12 hydrants needed at a location set by the fire department. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 July 7, 1987 Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South litirlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Mr. Blodgett: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 EnclosPi1 are the minutes from the June 23, 1987 Planning Commispion meeting. If you have any questions please call me at 658-790 Sincerely, Kathryn Perkins, Acting City Planner KP/mcp 1 Encl 01 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 June 19, 1987 Dennis Blodgett Blodgett Insurance 1000 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 1340 - 1342 Shelburne Road Dear Denny: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning Commission regarding your plan. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 23, 1987 to represent your application. Sincerely, Kathryn Perkins, Acting Planner KP/mcp Encls cc: Gary Lavigne 1 fuutb '43urltngtvn Ni e Department .575 Dorset -treet South Nurlington, 7lermont 05401 MEMORANDUM TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE SR. RE. TUESDAY JUNE 23,1987 AGENDA ITEM DATE: JUNE 18,1987 '1 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 1. BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT SHELBURNE ROAD PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ON PROJECT # 8702A DATED MAY 29,1987 FOR CONSTRUCTION, BY THE BLODGETT CO. AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE IS 2 HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL. FREE TO CALL ME. M E M O R A N D U M To: The South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: June 23, 1987 agenda items Date: June 19, 1987 3) BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road shall be closed. 2. Holmes Road extension should dead end beyond entrance drive and entrance should tee into it. The new street should include curbs, sidewalk and centered within the planned rights -of -way. 3. There should be a sidewalk along Shelburne Road. 4. Site shall include storm water runoff control measures. A drainage and erosion control study shall be conducted by Heindel & Noyes and their recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and followed. 4) IRISH ESTATE SUBDIVISION, ALLEN ROAD 1. Harbor Ridge Road shall be extended at least beyond the water tank property and a turnaround constructed. This extension to be constructed to City standards and deeded to the City. 6) PAUL ADAMS SUBDIVISION, AIRPORT PARKWAY, KIRBY ROAD 1. This parcel of land is a very deep wooded ravine. Lot #2 would require a very large volume of fill material to make it useable. This material would have to be hauled on local streets especially Kirby Road resulting in damage to these street. 7) St. AMAND & ANDERSON, 59 SWIFT STREET 1. Extensive lot coverage by buildings and pavement will increase drainage runoff. This increased runoff will drain upon the adjacent property especially the property to the west and to the north. I would recommend a piped system with a series of drop inlets to intercept surface and road runoff and outlet it to the east. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 14 JULY 1987 PAGE 6 15. The existing force main serving Ridgewood along the eastside end of Dorset Street from the overpass to Kennedy Drive shall be shown on the final plans. 16. Typed specifications shall include a section on filling or shall make reference to Vermont State Highway specifi- 17. Paving thicknesses shall be 2 inch base course and one inch surface course for a total of 3 inches. 18. On page 20, on the typical road cross section, the note regarding the reduction of the road base thickness shall be deleted. 19. City Water Department shall review the watermain design prior to final plat. 20. Water main fillings shall be covered with plastic prior to pouring thrust blocks. 21. There should be a typical road cross section at the cul- de-sacs showing pavement slope. 22. No parking spaces shall be used for storage of recreational vehicles or boats. 23. A traffic study shall be performed for final plat and shall be submitted to Craig Leiner at least 2 weeks in advance of meeting. 24. 12 fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer to be located on the property in locations designated �2y the Fire Department. 25. The final plat shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion. Members agreed that the time -frame for stipulation #7 would be included in the Final Plat. In the vote which followed, the motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Dennis Blodgett of Blodgett In- surance to construct a 30,000 sq. ft. building for office/retail use at 1340 and 1342 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Blodgett said the Zoning Board had approved the 50 ft. PLANNING COMMISSION 14 JULY 1987 PAGE 7 extension of the Commercial zone where parking is planned. This will keep the Shelburne Rd. frontage for green space. They also got the multi -use permit for office/retail uses. Mr. Lavigne said they meet the overlay zone and trip ends. The traffic light at the intersection will be going in this summer, and Mr. Blodgett is contributing to this. Members felt the 12 sugar maples along Holmes Rd. Extension were too close together and asked that they be reduced to 6 but of a 4" caliper. Discussion then arose as to whether the development is on one lot or 2 and whether calculations were done based on land from another lot. This would affect traffic calculations. Members felt they could not take action until this question was settled. They agreed to hold a special meeting on 7/21 if it is found that this is all one lot. Mr. Belter moved to continue the application. Mr. Burgess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of Mery Brown to construct a 3072 sq. ft. addition to an existing 7659 sq. ft. building and revise site access and parking for the existing Earl's Schwinn lot at 142 Dorset Street Mr. Llewellyn said this was the same basic plan as at sketch plan. The building is 37' x 207' and they want to add 3072' fronting onto Dorset St. as an addition to Dorset Square. There will be 62 new parking spaces with 2 curb cuts on Corporate Way. They will close the Dorset St. curb cut. They do not yet have the Corporate Way right-of-way. A question of lot coverage arose. Ms. Perkins said her calculations showed 72% coverage; even combining the 2 lots she showed 71.6%. Mr. Llewellyn said they are doing a boundary survey and will use those figures. If they are wrong, they will adjust the building. Mrs. Maher said they should not show the 3 big trees that will be coming down when Dorset St. is widened. $8600 in landscaping is required. Mr. Brown agreed to 2 more maple trees up front. A traffic study is required to determine the impact of the addition. A question also arose as to whether the new Dorset St. plan includes a traffic light at the entrance to Dorset Square. It is not shown on the Dorset St. plan. Memorandum July 10, 1987 Page 3 hour trip ends for the 4800 square feet of retail/wholesale space making 46 total. The applicant performed an actual count which produced 46 peak hour trip ends as well. Landscaping: The dollar amount worth of the landscaping as shown is adequate. A $10,500 landscaping bond must be posted prior to permit. Other: A sewer allocation of 450 gallons/day shall be made and the $2.50 per gallon fee must be paid. See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 5) DENNIS BLODGETT, 1340 - 1342 SHELBURNE 90AD Mr. Blodgett proposes to construct a 30,000 square foot building for office and retail use. The front part of this lot on which this building is proposed, is approximately 2.8 acres and is zoned C-1. The rest of Blodgett's lot is zoned R-4. Office and retail are permitted uses in the C-1 zone., Total coverage is approximately 55%. Building coverage is approximately 12%. Mr. Blodgett is scheduled to apply to the Zoning Board to receive a Conditional Use approval to move the C-1 District line 50 feet back into the R-4 property as per Section 22.007 of the ordinance. He is also applying fora multiple use permit for office and retail. Access: A single access road 32 feet in width is shown off Shelburne Road directly opposite from Holmes Road. Two existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road will be closed. The new road is within the 80 foot r.o.w. Access to the development is shown from the 32 foot wide driveway off Holmes Road extension. Circulation: A 24 foot wide circulation drive is shown around the entire perimeter of the building and is adequate if approved by Fire Chief Goddette. Sidewalks along Shelburne Road and Holmes Road extension are shown. See Bill Szymanski's comments. Parking: 133 spaces are required for office use in this proposed building. 150 spaces are shown. 22 of these spaces are within the proposed 50 foot extension of the C-1 zone into the R-4 zone. Traffic: This lot is in traffic overlay zone 4. The maximum permitted trip ends for this 2.8 acre commercial lot is 91. If the 50 foot setback of the C1 district into the R4 district is approved by the Zoning Board, the lot size would be 129,413 square feet and would permit 97 maximum peak hour trip -ends. According to limited ITE data 95 trip ends will be generated by 3 Memorandum July 10, 1987 Page 4 these uses during peak traffic on Shelburne Road. If the Zoning Board denies the application for the setback of the C1 district line the Commission may approve the higher traffic generation if it finds that the reduction in curb cuts, the signal etc. produces a net benefit to traffic flow (Section 17.50). The Commission could also require a traffic study and apply the PCD standards. If this project is approved, the 4 phase traffic signal must be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. ,Gw Landscaping: worth of new landscaping is required for this proposed development; $5700.00 worth is shown. At the last meeting Judy Hurd suggested that street trees be planted along the new Holmes Road,Extension. These should be shown on revised plans and should be 3 - 4 inch minimum caliper. I will have further landscaping recommendations at the meeting. Other: A sewer allocation of 1650 gallons/day must be made and $2.50 per gallon paid prior to permit. See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 6) MERV BROWN, DORSET SQUARE ASSOCIATES, 142 DORSET STREET As discussed, at the May 23rd meeting, Mr. Brown plans to consolidate the Earl's Schwinn lot with the Dorset Square lot. He proposes to construct a 3072 square foot addition to the south side of the existing 7659 square foot Earl's Schwinn building, and add parking in the back with access onto Corporate Way. Coverage: No lot size coverage figures are shown on the plan. Total coverage for the approved Dorset Square plans was 70.6%. According to my calculations if Earl's lot (with the proposed addition and parking constructed) is consolidated with the Dorset Square lot, total coverage would be 72% (179,260 square feet coverage on a 247,856 square foot lot). This exceeds total coverage allowance of 70%. Building coverage would be 23%. Access: As discussed the applicant proposes to close the existing Dorset Street curb cut into the Earl's Schwinn lot. The proposed addition will be oriented toward Dorset Square and have access via the Dorset Square driveway. The rest of the building will be oriented toward Corporate Way and it's main access will be from Corporate Way. Two curb cuts are proposed off Corporate Way to access the proposed new parking. Until Corporate Way becomes a public street, written permission must be obtained by 4 M 9 M O R A N D U M To: The South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: June 23, 1987 agenda items Date: June 19, 1987 3) BLODGETT DEVELOPMENT, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road shall be closed. 2. Holmes Road extension should dead end beyond entrance drive and entrance should tee into it. The new street should include curbs, sidewalk and centered within the planned rights -of -way. 3. There should be a sidewalk along Shelburne Road. 4. Site shall include storm water runoff control measures. A drainage and erosion control study shall be conducted by Heindel & Noyes and their recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Engineer and followed. 4) IRISH ESTATE SUBDIVISION, ALLEN ROAD 1. Harbor Ridge Road shall be extended at least beyond the water tank property and a turnaround constructed. This extension to be constructed to City standards and deeded to the City. 6) PAUL ADAMS SUBDIVISION. AIRPORT PARKWAY, KIRBY ROAD 1. This parcel of land is a very deep wooded ravine. Lot #2 would require a very large volume of fill material to make it useable. This material would have to be hauled on local streets especially Kirby Road resulting in damage to these street. 7) St. AMAND & ANDERSON, 59 SWIFT STREET 1. Extensive lot coverage by buildings and pavement will increase drainage runoff. This increased runoff will drain upon the adjacent property especially the property to the west and to the north. I would recommend a piped system with a series of drop inlets to intercept surface and road runoff and outlet it to the east. 1 Memorandum June 23, 1987 Page 3 driveway. Also, in the center island I would suggest planting one or two salt tolerant evergeeen. The azaleasproposed for the island can be planted beneath these trees and the yews I would place around the entrance. An additional $1300.00 worth of landscaping would cover two more 2-1/2 to 3" more norway maples, two 6 - 7 foot austrian pines and one 5 - 6 foot flowering crab. A landscaping bond of $4350.00 shall be posted prior to permit. 4) DENNIS BLODGETT, 1340 _ 1342 SHELBURNE ROAD Mr. Blodgett proposes to construct a 37,500 square foot building for office use. The front part of this lot, is which this building is proposed, is approximately 2.6 acres and is zoned C- 1. The rest of Blodgett's lot is zoned R-4. Offices are a permitted use in the C-1 zone. Total coverage is approximately 55%. Building coverage is approximately 12%. Mr. Blodgett is scheduled to apply to the Zoning Board to receive a Conditional Use approval to move the C-1 District line 50 feet back into the R-4 property as per Section 22.007 of the ordinance. Access: A single access road 32 feet in width is shown off Shelburne Road directly opposite from Holmes Road. Two existing curb cuts on Shelburne Road will be closed. The new road is within the 80 foot r.o.w. Circulation: A 24 foot wide circulation drive is shown around the entire perimeter of the building and is adjacent if approved by Fire Chief Goddette. Parking: 150 spaces are required for office use in this proposed building. 150 spaces are shown. 22 of these spaces are within the proposed 50 foot extension of the C-1 zone into the R-4 zone. Traffic: This lot is in traffic overlay zone 4. The maximum permitted trip ends for this 2.8 acre commercial lot is 91. According to limited ITE data 106 trip ends will be generated by this use during peak traffic on Shelburne Road. I informed Mr. Blodgett that this project would exceed the overlay. He plans to revise the building size to comply with the traffic overlay. Revised plans will be available at the meeting. If this project is approved, the 4 phase traffic signal must be in operation at the Holmes Road/Shelburne Road intersection prior to issuance of permit. Landscaping: $23,500 worth of new landscaping is required for this proposed development, $5700.00 worth is shown. I will have landscaping recommendations at the meeting. Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments. 3 "tx PLANNING COMMISSION 23 JUNE 1987 PAGE 3 Plan application of Larry Caron to construct a 12,000 sq. ft. building for use primarily as an auto -body shop and secondarily for used car sales as depicted on a plan entitled "Larry Caron, 4095 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont, Site Plan" prepared 12y Lamoureux Consulting Engineers, dated 4/17 87 with the following stipulations: 1. A maximum of 24 used cars on the lot for sale at one time will be allowed. 2. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and a landscaping bond of $4350. shall be posted prior to permit. 3. A sewer allocation of 150 gallons per day shall be obtained prior to permit. 4. The garage floor drains shall be connected to a grease and grip trap system, not to the storm or footing drains. 5. No cars hall be parked or displayed in spaces not designated on the plan. 6. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mrs. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimousl 4. Site plan application of Dennis Blodgett of Blodgett Insurance, to construct a 37,500 sq. ft. building, for office use at 1340 and 1342 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Blodgett said the building will be built in 3 phases, with only phase I to be built this year. There will be no parking in the setback, but they do want to move the zone line back 50' to allow parking there. This will come up at the Zoning Board meeting of 13 July. Mr. Burgess said the Commission could not approve the site plan until it is acted upon by the Zoning Board. Mr. Lavigne explained that the zone line is presently 50 ft. from the property line and they originally thought it could be handled as an administrative change. After a brief discussion, the Commission agreed to listen to the proposal as a sketch plan. Mr. Blodgett said access would be from Holmes Rd. The building will be 2-1/2 stories of colonial design. Building coverage is about 12% and lot coverage about 55% A cedar hedge borders the northern property line. Mrs. Maher felt it might be necessary to reduce the square PLANNING COMMISSION 23 JUNE 1987 PAGE 4 footage of the building to get down to the allowable trip ends. Mr. Blodgett said he has worked out a verbal agreement with Rich Tarrant of IDS to share in the cost of the first 250 ft. of Holmes Rd. Mr. Blodgett will also share the cost of the traffic light at Holmes Rd. Mrs. Maher said the plan should show the sidewalk. There is a shortage df landscaping dollars, and Mrs. Hurd suggested a few more street trees. An erosion control study by Wagner, Heindel & Noyes is also required. Mr. Belter said he would like to know how snow removal will be handled, and Mrs. Hurd said she would like to see the location of the dumpster. 5. Sketch plan application of Tom Drolette for a 3-lot sub- division for residential use on the Bernice Irish Estates Mr. Drolette said the original farm was left to the 9 children of whom his wife is the youngest. His brother, who farms the land, said he does not want a road going through the property. Mr. Palmer explained that CWD was given a right-of-way on the the dirt road to service their water tank and this right-of-way is blocked off with a gate which must be opened and closed in order to use it. The land is being used for a pasture. Mr. Drolette has agreed to build a city spec road from Harbor Ridge and to make the cul de sac to city specs. The sewer is already in, and there will be a sidewalk. 6. Site plan application of Mr. Anderson and Mr. Ste. Amand to construct two mini -storage buildings, a total of 10,800 sq. ft, at lot #1, 59 Swift St. Ms. Perkins said this is the same plan as approved for the previous owners of the property. Mr. Ste. Amand said they do not expect a dust problem as they expect only 3 or 4 cars a day. He would prefer to leave the road gravel, but would pave if required. Gravel is better for drainage. Mrs. Maher suggested possibly paving the road and leaving the back gravel. Mrs. Hurd suggested a review at the end of a year, and if dust is a problem to then require paving. Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Mr. St. Amand and Mr. Anderson to construct two mini -storage buildings measuring 30 ft. x 180 ft. each for a total of 10,800 sq. ft. at lot #1, 59 Swift 12/20/88 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised Site Plan application of Mery Brown for construction of a 29,425 square foot building for office and retail use as depicted on a 6 page set of plans titled "Holmes Road Commercial, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., and dated 12/8/88 with the following stipulations: 1. A $19,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The proposed landscaping plan valued at $17,000 must be planted. The remaining $2,500 may be credited to existing trees once identified by the Planner and shown on the plans. These credited trees shall be identified prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The total bond shall be posted until it is definite that all existing trees for which credit is granted survive. 2. A $2,439 intersection improvement fee shall be paid prior to permit based on the 95 trip ends generated by this development. 3. The existing Shelburne Road curb cuts shall be closed. 4. A sewer allocation of 1650 gpd is granted and the $2.50 per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 5. A concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Shelburne Road and a bond posted prior to permit. Sidewalk must include a handicapped ramp. 6. The portion of the 80 foot r.o.w. located on this property shall be dedicated to the City prior to permit. Legal documents (Offer of Dedication and Deed) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to permit. 7. The fourth face of this signal must be installed and be operating prior to permit. 8. The sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension shall extend across the driveway and stop where the road stops. It shall be uniform grade across the driveway with no dips or breaks. Sidewalk must include a handicapped ramp. 9. The sewer manhole shall have a stub extending easterly. 10. Compact car spaces shall be signed to allow compact car parking only. 11. The pipe for the storm drainage system shall be concrete or plastic, not metal or aluminum. 12. Two fire hydrants shall be provided on the property in locations to be approved by the Fire Chief. 13. The plan shall be revised to show the 8" water main along Holmes Road Extension extended to the eastern boundary line of the property. 14. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. W�rm ROUTO , December 16, page 3 Y;%pnjR9nda items 1988 At the 8/9/88 meeting, Mr. Milot contended that the proposed project promotes the Act 200 goal for addressing affordable housing. I feel it is important to point out other Act 200 goals such as the following: o "Intensive residential development shall be encouraged primarily in areas that are identified as village or urban centers." o "Development shall be planned so as to maintain the historic settlement pattern of compact village and urban centers separated by rural countryside." o "Public investments, including the construction or expansion of infrastructure, shall be made so as to support development in a locally designated growth area, and shall not be made so as to lead to development in important and economically viable agricultural or conservation areas." o "The rate of growth should not exceed the ability of the town and the area to provide facilities and services." 4) HOLMES ROAD COMMERCIAL, 1342 SHELBURNE ROAD Mery Brown proposes to revise the approved Site Plan for construction of an office/retail building at 1342 Shelburne Road. The original Site Plan application for this project was approved by the Planning Commission on 5/10/88. The minutes from this meeting are enclosed. The main difference between the approved plan and the proposed revision are summarized below: Item Total square footage Office Space Retail Space Total Lot Coverage Parking Spaces Compact Car Space Approved Revised Plan Plan 29,424 16,000 131424 G.F.A. 76% 154 31 29,425 14,785 13,881 G.L.A. 69% 152 37 Landscaping Value $13,680 $15,630 Coverage: Coverage requirements are met. The original approved plan violated total lot coverage requirements (76% proposed, 70% maximum allowed). The revised plan meets total lot coverage requirements (69% proposed). 3 Memorandum - Planning December 20, 1988 agenda items December 16, 1988 Page 4 Parking: The proposed uses require 152 spaces and 152 spaces are shown. 37 spaces are for compact cars which equates to 24.3% of the total proposed. The City's zoning ordinance allows 25% to be compact car spaces. Traffic: Based on I.T.E. trip generation rates, the proposed uses would generate 95 trips during the peak hour. This site is located in Zone 4 of the Traffic Overlay District which allows a maximum peak hour trip generation of 95. Landscaping: The project requires $19,500 in landscaping. My calculations estimate the proposed landscaping at a value of $15,630. The applicant estimates the proposed landscaping to be worth $24,760. A local landscape firm is preparing an estimate for me and I hope to have it prior to Tuesday' meeting. In the 5/10/88 approval, a stipulation was included which allowed the applicant to count existing trees as credit toward meeting landscaping requirements. These trees were never identified. If the proposed landscape plan is determined deficient in meeting the required value, I would recommend that existing trees be credited. However, the trees to be saved should be identified and approved by me prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Even if it is determined that the proposed landscape plan meets the required value, I urge that as many existing trees as possible be saved. 5) J.G. ARCHITECTS, LOT 4, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE J.G. Architects, Inc. proposes to construct a 2-story, 14,300 square foot building for light industrial (T-Shirt printing) uses on lot 4 of the Berard. Subdivision on Ethan Allen Drive. Of the 14,400 square feet, 10,400 square feet would be on the first floor and the remaining 4,000 square feet on the second floor. The property is zoned Industrial -Commercial. The property is bounded on the north by vacant land, on the east by Kelco, on the west by a truck repair business, and on the south by Ethan Allen Drive. Access/Circulation: Access would be provided by a 20 foot wide driveway off Ethan Allen Drive. Circulation is provided only in front of the building. This is primarily due to the narrowness of the lot. Chief Goddette informed me that he needs access along at least one side of the building for its entire length in order to provide adequate fire protection. The only way this could be done is by modifying the footprint of the building to make it more narrow. 4 TRANS/OP INC. P.O. Box 29, Route 2A Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 878-5977 March 21, 1988 Mr. Geoffrey Green Assistant District Coordinator District No. 4, Environmental Commission 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Mr. Green: The intersection of U.S. Route 7, Holmes Road Extension, and Holmes Road has been evaluated without and with a separate left -turn phase (as an advance green) on the north approach for the morning peak hour volumes. Traffic usage for the two lanes on this approach was designated as accommodating left -through and through -right movements. As summarized in Table 1, better traffic performance is achieved at this intersection without the inclusion of a separate left -turn phase for the southbound traffic. Level of service `A' is available during the morning peak hour with two-phase operation of the traffic signal, while the performance becomes `B' service level with three-phase signal timing. The measures of performance are noted in Table 2 as `A' and `B', respectively, for off-peak periods and the afternoon peak hour. Therefore, the recommended control is two-phase signal operation throughout the day at this intersection. Please advise of any additional information that may be desired in this matter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Joseph C. Oppenlander, P.E. Vice -President JCO:njk Enclosure TABLE 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY - OPERATIONAL U.S. Route 7, Holmes Road Extension, and Holmes Road Approach 1990 a.m. peak hour Stopped Delay (spv) 2-0 3-0 South Burlington, Vermont Level of Service 2-0 3-0 U.S. Rt. 7 - North App. 4.B 3.B A A U.S. Rt. 7 - South App. 2.2 6.1 A B Holmes Rd. Ext. - East App. 21.1 21.1 C C Holmes Rd. - West App. 24.0 24.0 C C Intersection 4.7 6.2 A B TABLE 2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE SUMMARY - OPERATIONAL U.S. Route 7, Holmes Road Extension, and Holmes Road South Burlington, Vermont Approach Stopped Delay Level of Service (spv) 1990 off-peak periods U.S. Rt. 7 - North App. 1.9 A U.S. Rt. 7 - South App. 1.6 A Holmes Rd. Ext. - East App. 22.6 C Holmes Rd. - West App. 24.7 C Intersection 3.0 A 1990 p.m. peak hour U.S. Rt. 7 - North App. 3.6 A U.S. Rt. 7 - South App. 3.1 A Holmes Rd. Ext. - East App. 24.2 C Holmes Rd. - West App. 22.5 C Intersection 5.0 B VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION JOB NAME: HOLMES ROAD EXT. DATE: 3-18-BO JOB NO.: 88015 ANALYST: R. DICKINSON DATA SOURCE: ITE TRIP GENERATION - 4th EDITION AVERAGE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------- SIZE UNITS L.U.C. WEEKDAY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 18 UNITS 230 105 GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING 15,000 SO. FT. 710 331 GENERAL MERCHANDISE 15,000 SO. FT. 810 649 -------------------------------------------------------------- TOTALS 1,085 VTE/DAY --- AM PEAK HOUR --- --- PM PEAK HOUR --- ENTER ---------------------------------------------- EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL 1 7 8 7 3 10 34 5 39 7 34 41 5 2 7 36 36 72 ---------------------------------------------- 41 14 54 49 74 123 VTE/HDUR VTE/HOUR FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED Engineering and Planning Services t FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN ._.%;ORPORATED Engineering & Planning Services The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878-3000 m roe MIS 8C 3 F-D. C)Cr. - J` QDGC7T SHEET NO. I OF I CALCULATED BY Roa DATE -1a-98' CHECKED BY DATE < \ � . HOLMES RLAD COMMERCIAL #BG124 ESTIMATE LANDSCAPE COST WORK9HEE[ UUAW SPECIES _� SIZ���-__- // UKI\_COS�T TOTAL-C[RT 13 13 Prunos H.J. Tilia Cordata / 1-3/4" - 2" 8&B' P" - 2-1/2" B&B $ 98.00 . $124.00// $1,274.O0 $1,612'0O, 4V� 26 Pinus Nigra 4' - 5' B&B � $ 92.0v _ $2,392.00 53 Cornus Mas #2C 18" - 24" $ 8.60 $ 455.80 257 Juniperos C. Plvmosa 15" - 18" B&B $ 12.50 $3121N50 - Subtotal = $13,048.50 source: Princeton Nurseries '88 '89 Fall - Spring Catalog 200 Perennials 4" Container $ 5.00 $0000.00 source: 4-Seasons N"vsery 2 lb' Nnrtheastprn Wildflower Mix 1 lb. @ $ 49.95 $ 99.90 source: Vermont Wildflower Farm TOTAL PLANT MATERIALS = $14,148.40 ESTIMATED INSTALLATION COST = $10,611.30 TK[AL LANDSCAPE COST * = $24,759.70 k Price given does not include cost of topsoil or seeding of lawn areas #vvith Nurlingtnn irc Department 575 Morset street —*outb Nurlington, Vermont 05401 J OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF (802) 658.7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE SUBJECT: TUESDAY DECEMBER 20,1988 ACIENDA ITEMS DATE: THURSDAY DECEMBER 15,1988 ETHAN ALLEN FARM R.M.H. ASSOC. LOT ## 4 PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT -THIS TIME BETTER ACCI:`:� IS NEEDED IF WE ARE TO GIVE PROPER FIRE PROTECTION. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO BRING OT YOUR ATTENTION THAT WE WERE TOLD THAT THERE IS 868 GPM. OF WATER AT 20 LBS. THE FIRE WE HAD LAST WEEK AT THE FARM WE FOUND TO HAVE LESS THE 500 GPM. AND COULD NOT SUPPLY 3-HAND LINES. 2. FIOI,\ff?S ROAD COMMERCIAL B.D.P. PROPERTY PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING IS NEEDED FOR PROPER FIRE PROTECTION: B. AT LEAST 2-HYDRANTS ON THE PROPERTY DUE TO THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT. City of South Bu rl i i i "t ton WATER DEPARTMENT 403 QUEEN CITY PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. 864-4361 MEMO TO: Joe Weith, City Planner FROM: Sue Messina, Water Supt. DATE: December 15, 1988 RE: Holmes Road Commercial - Mery Brown, Applicant In order for this project to comply with the South Burlington Water Department Rules and Regulations and in order to receive approval from this Department, the 8" water main must be extended to the Blodgett property line and ended with a valve, cap and thrust block. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: December 20, 1988 agenda items Date: December 16, 1988 3) SOUTHEAST SUMMIT, DORSET STREET 1. There should be a clearance (10' minimum) between the Velco easement line and the multi -family units. Residents should not have to encroach upon the easement when they exit out their back door. 2. The sewage pumping station and long force main (15,000 feet +) should be maintained by an association. Pumping sewage that distance will be expensive to operate and maintain. 3. Additional water storage facilities will be required for the area as it develops a impact fee for that purpose should be assessed. 4. Dorset Street in the area is in very poor condition and in need of reconstruction, widening and repaving. 4) HOLMES ROAD COMMERCIAL, SHELBURNE ROAD - HOLMES ROAD 1. The pipe for the storm drainage system shall be concrete or plastic not metal or aluminum. 2. Traffic signal faces will have to be added for Holmes Road unless it will be done under the IDX project to the south. 3. Plans with revision date of 12/7/88 are acceptable. 5) R.M.H. ASSOCIATES VERSATILE GRAPHICS, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. The above referenced plan dated 11/4/88 prepared by J.G. Architects, Inc. is acceptable. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 December 20, 1988 Mr. Mery Brown 200 Twin Oaks Terrace Suite One South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Holmes Road Commercial project Dear Mr. Brown: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next, Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's, Chief Goddette's and Sue Messina's comments. Please be sure someone is presftnt on Tuesday, December 20, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls cc: Mr. Lance Llewellyn PLANNING COMMISSION 29 NOVEMBER 1988 PAGE 5 Other Business Mr. Jacob read his letter to the Governor regarding the Bolton interchange and the need for the 2 S. Burlington projects that have been eliminated from the State 5-year plan. The Blodgett project is proposing a new layout which would reduce office space and increase retail space. Members felt they want the applicant back in. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:50pm. Clerk ff • I%jy. #-- I ir/ PLANT LIST ZSq 3 11 s 7 f ► 3 !-t3t.�� �t,I vim+✓-�-►�(Nl� N.S . 3q !3 13Gs ioA: ( JNMIN/TILA^ 4 TA 2925 1(-70 -# 9�S At-v�r-IAN ���v �� 1 4I % 53 GG ��'4�IC�i..��N 1� �/G�NI� t—Al Z 5 7 A3 1r/ t �1vN`I t=/-1v41 FC�=1, K;: GNIkN, 2* W Na (z� NF.��TC RN 1�l l U7�t,t�1N- ►�1 �X wv 1 N� a l Wi1A nA"VM), I'/z -7," m w - L,y 70L I v E',rz: G H9tt4z. y -rMe - LJEAP L-t IQX�E)NJ (a �STIe..�AnJ �inJE � , W ' 4 7-3�07 N t>o rc.f2.a. 70PJ r�� � � i Goa L c o,� - Z� D r Alan `1Y",S7r*,/ W IA'- ` 1 &-r- , 5E� ►� a � ) o P,yo �� �� rS " Y�� �i> �5 X(,v S o a o 50 - ys- 13f ?W 76ro P)e qs 10 -7 Y2 t AP �TOZO" AY) ) ) s, Lea ) Vo 0 -, L�06 0 -to v I JK 0 t? #0 A,Y) A,) -)So Al/ tor" Sys � Is- /L oh 113.30A �,5 � 03 l�) y 3--; x L I a �03 /0 0 vEY�n.G� (fALGS 4"r�*:4 G1AL � L R'r� b It 1,4 s 15/off </ ��-' e.� , .x, l�. 9 1 GnAe.") SeAG.9 a ��� qro S1d �'7, 2 00uo 2-0-7 ►}A zo- to ✓ %vTA L LvT Co vt gAeW d loK�.27 � ►S 2,07 /60 630 l50 -Z,5J ( zo 30, von- = 7t sy2 = 7/.3 LArJ^DS6<2,-? ►N 6r 45'§rI MA115 Fl,ov,.e `1 l,�i►.�- M,v I f.L1 C �cc I,vocs w I L eat j. MIX 1".1E a-e r,� N I /!.,LS b 3 X, 4,o7a -* ts�i0 e,-6 # 71000 S z9 -�t 1" 1074 r\ . kley'A-11 011) 11 6re1Ut,1e1q7)OAJ 644CS wt tellxehk -T4 .,4.,4 7;;.Ic g14 S Piz-) .,L- Txl kc-- -rA I L, ,41YL, _rW I e 9A-Ml 1,0 0 0 --F4, CLA = loo 0 — / 46 7 / Z, -5 7, 14 �e_vy tl OiCF::r-,cc M7 17 Olui hie r4"j G.o c-T SeAr-& S PA R kr A,16- --ram L um , /. c�F T -OM L ,4 s4 3 Zo. I 1 3. LaN� tGAf�in14 '. Pr2t�PDs� YALuE A eftaova f) rL-qL Y' L+r 4- for *,Pj 14 S K-t �r- � e S s el kit L-e, ' %A yvi r 2. Ge�r.�. e�.�� c k"", 1J Q No Text j?tj 1/ lZ sr�8fi j 'fZ 1 '� C^r E�•/EP.,oT l n �J � L GS Aot_rzc,,o. v �j,z,,, ,ErZc i A c.. � �/,¢r�� �/� S�rI'�' � ,, , �s �pe-?.a /L P6e--r74.*J !3' ggi L A R&-rA t l uoU X `tip .i -------------- Dti-1 c-e pole-Ti D AJ -- 14; 7e5- 0 (,, F A 7/ o - GcA/r-w^ L- ar,", c_ e i2A-n--//vvc) 0 — �, 2/ c/ % Fi-g--j/O d o k G PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 November 2, 1988 Mr. Mery Brown 200 Twin Oaks Terrace Suite 5 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Holmes Road Commercial, 1342 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Brown: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I apologize for not writing to you sooner in regards to the revised Site Plan of a 29,424 square foot retail/office building at 1342 Shelburne Road. I was waiting the outcome of Mr. Blodgett's Final Plat application for subdivision of the parcel in question which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 1, 1988. I reviewed the revised Site Plan titled "Holmes Road Commercial, Site Utilities Plan" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc:. and dated September 16, 1988. I see no problem with the laN()tat of the building, the proposed square footage or location of sewer and water. However, I still need two pieces of information before I can officially approve the revised Site Plan. First, I need a revised landscape plan which shows, in particular, the location of plantings in front of the building. The plan should show the same number, type and size of plantings which uer•e approved by the Planning Commission on May 10, 1988 (sett, flans titled "Blodgett Property Development, Commercial Porticin," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and dated May 5, 1988). Secondly, the City's Engineer and Super i.ntendent. ut' the 1.;tter:• Department reviewed the revised plan and feel a water lint, valve is needed where the plan shows the water line to be ended and capped. This will assure a continued i:'low of water to the commercial building when the water line serving the bac1% parcel is connected to the water line serving the front pare e.l. `le-r•v br•owrr No%-mber' G, 1988 Psi ,, e 2 P1PasP. submi t. t3 pian addr-essing the issues (iiscus�;ed above. It' you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, G �;14 .ioe We.it;h, `� City Planner• Jw/mcp cc: Dennis Blodgett Lance Llewellyn PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 January 13, 1989 Mery Brown 200 Twin Oaks Terrace Suite One South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Holmes Road Commercial Dear Mr. Brown: Enclosed are the December 20, 1988 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, (7� Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl CC: Lance Llewellyn etState of Vermont lbrter Supply and Wastewater Disposal CASE NO. WW-4-0061 APPLICANT Plaza Investments ADDRESS 200 Twin Oaks Terrace, Suite South Burlington, VT 05403 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES Chapter 4, Public Buildings Appendix A, Design Guidelines This project, consisting of amending Public Building Permit PB- 4-1501 to relocate the municipal sewer line and building sewers for a proposed office/retail building on Lot #1 approved in Subdivision Permit EC-4-1343, located at the intersection of U.S. Route 7 and Holmes Road Extension, in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not constitute Act 250 approval (Title V.S.A., Chapter 151). The permittee is hereby reminded to procure all relevant State and local permits prior to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project Number 88124 Sheet 1 of 6 "Site & Utilities Plan" dated Nov. 1988, last revised 12/22/88; Sheet 3 of 6 "Typical Details" dated Sept. 1988; and Sheet 5 of 6 "Typical Details" (for "Sewer Insulation Detail" only) dated Sept. 1988 prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) All conditions set forth in Subdivision Permit #EC-4-1343 dated November 14, 1988 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. (4). This permit shall supercede Public Building Permit #PB-4- 1501 dated September 16, 1988, thereby rendering it null and void. (5) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. (6) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (7) By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, and with this permit. WATER SUPPLY (8) The project is approved for water supply by construction and utilization of the proposed public water system subject to the jurisdiction of the Vermont Department of Health. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Division of Protection. The permittee shall forward a copy of the Health Department's acceptance letter of the completed public water system to the Division of Protection for inclusion in the project file. Plaza Investme j ww-4-0061 J l Page 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL (9) The project is approved for connection to the South Burlington Bartlett's Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 1650 gallons of sewage per day. (10) A professional engineer, registered in the State of Vermont, is to generally supervise the construction of the sanitary sewer line extensions and, upon completion of construction, the supervising engineer is to submit to the Protection Division a written certification stating all construction has been completed in accordance with the stamped approved plans. The engineer's certification is to be submitted to the Division prior to the occupancy of any unit and the certification shall include, but not be limited to, the numerical results of all leakage testing performed on each segment of the sanitary sewer extension and all manholes, as described in Appendix A, of the Environmental Protection Rules. Patrick A. Parenteau, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this loth day of January, 1989. cc: Donald Robisky City Planning Commission " Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry FitzPatrick-Llewellyn, Inc. PB-4-1501 EC-4-1343 4 5/10/88 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised site plan of Dennis Blodgett for 29,424 square feet of retail. and general offices as depicted on a plan entitled "Blodgett Property Development, Commercial Portion" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates last revised May 4, 1988 with the following stipulations: 1) A $16,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to ermit. The eastern edge of the parking lot shall be planted with thick evergreen hedge to buffer the new commercial from the R4 District. Landscaping valued at $10,000 must be planted Up to $6,500 in credit may be granted for existing trees--•ca,nce identified to the Planner and shown on the plans. The total bond shall be posted until it is definite that all existing trees for which credit is granted survive. (I(,"���' �)�� _ �1 _ 2) A $2439 intersection improvement fee shall be paid prior to permit based on the 95 trip ends generated by this development. 3) The existing Shelburne Road curb cuts shall be closed. 4) A sewer allocation of 1650 gpd is granted and the $250 per gallon fee paid prior to permit. 5) A concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Shelburne Road and a bond posted prior to permit. 6) The portion of the 80 foot r.o.w. located on this property shall be dedicated to the City prior to permit. Legal documents (Offer of Dedication -+Deed) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to permit. 7) The fourth face of this signal must be installed and operating prior to permit. 8) The sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension shall extend across the driveway and stop where the road stops. It shall be a uniform grade across the driveway with no dips or breaks. 9) The sewer manhole shall have a stub extending easterly. 10) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. �cv��c-i Cu�ts�Paceo cQa4�� �j ' SG�Q c� 4D 5/10/88 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised site plan of Dennis Blodgett for 29,424 square feet of retail and general offices as depicted on a plan entitled "Blodgett Property Development, Commercial Portion" prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Associates last revised May 4, 1988 with the following stipulations: 1) A $16,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. The eastern edge of the parking lot shall be planted with a thick evergreen hedge to buffer the new commercial from the R4 District. Landscaping valued at $10,000 must be planted. Up to $6,500 in credit may be granted for existing trees once identified to the Planner and shown on the plans. The total bond shall be posted until it is definite that all existing trees for which credit is granted survive. 2) A $2439 intersection improvement fee shall be paid prior to permit based on the 95 trip ends generated by this development. 3) The existing Shelburne Road curb cuts shall be closed. 4) A sewer allocation of 1650 gpd is granted and the $250 per gallon fee paid prior to permit. 5) A concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Shelburne Road and a bond posted prior to permit. 6) The portion of the 80 foot r.o.w. located on this property shall be dedicated to the City prior to permit. Legal documents (Offer of Dedication --Deed) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to permit. 7) The fourth face of this signal must be installed and operating prior to permit. 8) The sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension shall extend across the driveway and stop where the road stops. It shall be a uniform grade across the driveway with no dips or breaks. 9) The sewer manhole shall have a stub extending easterly. 10) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. !Know d-11 Versonii bg 014ts thesients THOMAS A. FARRELL of South Burlington in the County Of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantor , in the consideration of -----------------------------------Ten and More--------------------------- Dollars paid to my full satisfaction by DENNIS L. BLODGETT of South Burlington in the County Of Chittenden and State of Vermont Grantee , by these presents, do freely &Jae, Oran#, �SEII, QTvn!aEV1 anb Confirm unto the said Grantee DENNIS L. BLODGETT and his heirs and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South Burlington in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, described as follows, viz: Being a parcel of land, with brick house, shop building, and all other improvements thereon, said property located adjacent to and easterly of the Shelburne Road right-of-way, comprising 7.30 acres, more or less, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe located in the easterly sideline of the Shelburne Road right-of-way, said pipe marking the northwesterly corner of the herein described property; thence proceeding S 71°19'05" E 469.51 feet to a point; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 14°38'55" W 44.42 feet to a concrete monument; thence turning to the left and proceeding S 81°52'05" E 683.41 feet to a concrete monument; thence turning to the right and proceeding S 18°58'50" W 349.70 feet to a T-bar; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 70Q41'40" W 197.23 feet to a concrete monument; thence proceeding N 71024'20" W 87.29 feet to a point; thence continuing N 71°24'20" W con- secutively 859.02 feet to a concrete monument and 0.44 feet to a point in the easterly sideline of the Shelburne Road right-of-way; thence turning to the right and proceeding N 18°57'40" E consecutively 70.73 feet to an iron pipe and 197.45 feet to the iron pipe marking the point or place of beginning, the last two distances being in the easterly sideline of the Shelburne Road right-of-way. Said property is depicted on a survey entitled "Thomas A. Farrell Property: Melendy & Spring Lot Parcels, South Burlington, Vermont", dated February 14, 1986, and recorded in Map Volume at Page of the South Burlington City Land Records. The house, shop building, and all their components and systems, and all other improvements on the property are conveyed in their "as is" condition. The above -described property comprises all of the property located easterly of the Shelburne Road right-of-way that was conveyed to Thomas A. Farrell by Alice C. Woodbury by two deeds; individually by Warranty Deed dated June 19, 1944 and recorded in Volume 13 at Page 550 of the South Burlington City Land Records, and as guardian for Edward P. Woodbury by Guardian's Deed dated June 19, 1944 and recorded in Volume 18 at Pages 156-158 of the South Burlington City Land Records. The above -described property also comprises all of the property conveyed to Thomas A. Farrell by Executor's Deed of Anne M. Hancock, Irving Melendy, and Benjamin F. Schweyer, Executors of the Estate of Dorothy A. Haselton, dated October 9, 1985 and recorded in Miscellaneous Volume 214 at Pages 28-30 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. Included in this conveyance are all rights of the within Grantor under any covenants encumbering lands formerly owned by Dorothy Melendy (Haselton) including, but not limited to, the covenants set forth in a deed of Dorothy Melendy (Haselton) to George P. and Cecile S. Handy dated November 6, 1956 and recorded in Volume 39 at Page 524 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. By execution of this Warranty Deed, Grantor hereby terminates any and all rights to springs located on the above -described property, which rights were for the benefit of lands now owned by Grantor which are located westerly of the Shelburne Road right-of-way, including, but not by way of limitation, those rights recited originally in the Warranty Deed of George M. and Grace Allen to Allenwood Co., Inc. dated May 1, 1923 and recorded in Volume B at Pages 549-551 of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington. The above -described property is conveyed subject to and with the benefit of the terms and conditions of all permits and approvals affecting the property, municipal and state ordinances, statutes and regulations, and to real property taxes assessed but not yet due and payable. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned instruments, the records thereof and the references therein contained in further aid of this description. [PS13:K] _..•r . Jn I 4. �' � ; �Y ~ why J (� ��r � I � ,� •ocr av 1491 M J ,.. S ' ao.. .�. /� 'ry. i Q • N V �?. / �.. {yvl�A�ai+`s�A / ` .ro•ao/ � — � Via`*' 3� aOt N µ r 3 q + zNrr ,G4'b 61 Q: •t �� n1 w c �c n 9�'oL -�'`l bll7 .1 7 -7, S' S2ri� 1 1 IQ :LJ1 1 1 , M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: May 10, 1988 agenda items Date: May 6, 1988. 2) BLODGETT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTL RESIDENTIAL PORTION 1. Cul-de-sac shall have no parking around the outside curb where all driveways are planned or the pavement width increased to 30 feet. 2. There should be provisions to loop water main when Holmes Road is extended. 3. Developer shall furnish and install the street signs and stop sign. 4. Power and telephone cable shall be in an easement outside the street r.o.w. 5. A street lighting plan shall be submitted for review and street lights installed prior to sale of units. 4) LAKEWOOD DEVELOPMENT, SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Building "B" addition is shown on top of a sewer main serving 3 buildings, this is not acceptable, no building shall be on top of utilities especially water and sewer lines.. 2. Developer did not install sidewalk as shown on the plan, also did not provide handicapped ramps. 5) STORAGE WAREHOUSE ADDITION_L BERARD DRIVE 1. Plan dated November 12, 1983 prepared by Mike Dugan is acceptable. 3 ) BLO1)GETT PROPERTY = RETAILLOFFLCE COMPLEX 1 SH1�'LBURNIs h(�AD 1. The proposed sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension should extend across the driveway and stop where road stops. 'Phis %Jill allow the sidewalk to be extended in the future wi t hoot disturbing the (iriveway. This sidewalk shall. be a urii t•(WITI across the dr i %�eway. No dips or breaks. 2. There should also be a sidewalk along Shelburne- Road. 3. Sewer manhole shall have a stub extending east( -Hy. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) Dennis Blodgett, Blodgett Insurance, Shelburne Road, So. Burl., VT 05401 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone # ) 864 0950 ldiemann-Lamphere.Architects, Inc. 289 College St., Burl., V'1' 05401 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 864 0950 \ Gary Lavigne 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1340 and 1342 Shelburne Rd, 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Commercial 5,000 sf retail 25,000 sf office Burl, VT 05401 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) 30,000 sf, max. height 35 ft 2 floors; 15,000 sf 12er floor 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 100 office, 10 retail 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 11.6 %. landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage 54.2% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ 900,000 , Landscaping $ 7,500 new Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 7,500crec.it Phase one - Feb 38 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Phase two - Jan 89 Phase three - Jan 90 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 461 Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 95•5 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. . 13) --PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: - .___ -.9:00 -AIM - 5-:00 ---- - 14 ) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: n 1' onday - Frida DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF }TEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT July 1., 190'17 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office, Under 100,000 (I-S.F. ITE Land Use Code 71-1 Independent Variable —Trips per ]' 00 (rosy Square FPPt of Building ArPa Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 1.45 1.90 1.28 3 24. Exit Total Adjacent Street Traffic P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter Exit Total Peak Hour of A.M. Enter Exit Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total Source Numbers — , -21,-5.4- 72 1, 88, 89 92, 988, l00 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 - — G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area y a } Ne Li P t" . I PANT LIST �a 3 a A �� � �°��, � 16 4-tS �1,��-�I.►Y�,✓ �( fy-ONW N.S ..'�'V ('/Z �IN/TiL,iA 4fiA r3Z�7%z �. ih Lo ZA a Utz-tTri _ LANDSCAPE NOTES "• I. GENERAI. OONDITIONS REGARDTW', LARDSCAPING I 1. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE FREE OF DISEASE, INFESTATIONS OR DAMAGE. 2. FAILED OR UNSATISFACTORY PLANT MATERIAL TO BL I HE AT NO COST TO r1E OWNER. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO DE WARRANTED AND MAINTAINED A'f I AN ACCEPTABLE QUALITY FOR ONE YEAR AND WR; ECTED TO APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE AR7IITECI'. 3. 4. PAGE-2 OF TUESDAY MAY 10,1988 AGENDA ITEMS BLODGETT PROPERTY TOWN HOUSES HOLMES ROAD THE FOLLOWING WAS FOUND DURING REVIEW WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES: A. A SECOND HYDRANT MUST BE ADDED AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. B. ADDED PARKING SPACES SHOULD BE REQUIRED. C. THE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE MOVED 10' CLOSER TO THE ROAD TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR OUR EQUIPMENT. BLODGETT PROPERTY OFFICE/ COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PLANS REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED FOR OUR SERVICE: A. IF TWO BUILDINGS ARE CONNECTED BY A WALK -WAY THE BUILDINGS NEEDS to be 30' APART . B. DRIVE AROUND THE BUILDING SHOULD BE 30' WIDE. ''� A �pg_ A , u 1 State of Vermont AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering Natural Resources Conservation Council July 27, 1988 nnis Blodgett and Gerald Mil . South �a ��p 0 0 VT 05403 Dear Mr. Blodgett and Mr. Milot: Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 1-879-6563 RE: Application PB-4-1501; Proposed Office - Retail Building, Holmes Road Extension, South Burlington, Vermont. Our office has completed an initial review of the above referenced project and has determined that the additional information listed below will be needed before approval can be granted. (1) Please submit a copy of the "letter of approval" from the Department of Health for the water main extensions. Please submit two copies of any revised plans. Please note that no construction is granted until written approval is issued by the Division and all other authorities. Upon receipt of the above items, we shall continue our review. Should there be any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, �-- Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer EPC/kaa CC: City of South Burlington FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Inc. Dept of Health PLANNING COMMISSION -3y DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 5 Per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit. 5. A concrete sidewalk shall be constructed along Shelburne Rd. and a bond posted prior to permit. a handicapped ramp. Sidewalk must include \6. The portion of the 80 foot r.o.w. located on this property shall be dedicated to the City prior to permit. Legal doc- uments (Offer of dedication and Deed) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval prior to permit. 7. The fourth face of this signal must be installed and be operating prior to permit. —' J8. The sidewalk along Holmes Road Extension shall extend across the driveway and stop where the road stops. It shall be uniform —grade across the driveway with no dips or breaks. Sidewalk must include a handicapped ramp. J9. The sewer manhole shall have a stub extending easterlv. 10. Compact car spaces shall be signed to allow compact car parking only. 11. The pipe for the storm drainage system shall be concrete or plastic, not metal or aluminum. An additional hydrant shall be provided on the property in a location to be aChief.— r v -- _ _ _ pproved � the Fire Chief. 13. Based upon expressed representation 12y Applicant, there shall be no trailers used for storage on the site. 14. There shall be screening provided for the trash compactor 15. Parking spaces shall be used for vehicle parking only and shall not be used for sales of items such as Christmas trees, oil paintings etc. 16. The zoning permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Ms. Puqh seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan application of J.G. Architects, Inc. for con- struction of a 10,400 sg_ ftbuilding for light industrial use, lot #4 of the Berard industrial subdivisi Drive on, Ethan Allen :�� ua Veeman said the building will be one PLANNING COMMISSION 20 DECEMBER 1988 PAGE 4 lieve anything should be at the end of Droset St. with no plan to improve the road. Ms. Pugh appreciated the decrease in land coverage but felt it would be too close to the road. 4. Revised Site Plan application of(Mery Brow5jfor construc- tion o a sq• ft. building containing office and re- tail uses, 1342 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Llewellyn said they have addressed the water line and hydrant placement questions. The original approval was for a 2-story u-shaped building with commercial upstairs and retail down -stairs, with access off Holmes Rd. There would be 154 parking spaces. This was approved in'May, 1988.' Mr. Brown has purchased the property now and wants to change from a U- shape to an L-shape. The building has been widened a bit but the square footage is the same. The sewer line will now be straighter and will be extended to serve the residential units on the back lot. Mr. Weith said it meets coverage, parking and traffic requirements. The only question is land- scaping where $19,500 is required and he estimates only $15,600 is shown. A local firm has estimated the landscaping shown at $17,000. Mrs. Maher asked if more landscaping is needed. Mr. Weith said he can see areas that could use more landscaping. Members agreed to have Mr. Weith approve the additional landscaping. Mr. Craig asked if there will be any trailers for storage. Mr. Brown said there would not and he would have no problem if they were prohibited. Members felt the dumpster should be screened. Mr. Brown said this causes a problem with trucks pulling up to it. He agreed to screen it from the neighbors. Mr. Brown said the payment for the additional faces on the traffic light has already been arranged. Mr. Burgess said there should be a stipulation that the parking lot not be used for Christmas trees, etc. but only for parking. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission improve the revised site plan application of Mery Brown for construction of a 29,425 sq. ft.. building for office and retail use as depicted on a 6 page set of plans titled "Holmes Road Commercial, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn, Inc., Inc' dated, l2/20/88 with the following stipulations: 1. A 3-year $19,500 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit. A revised landscaping plan which meets the $19,500 required value shall be submitted to the City Planner for ap- prov-- p al rior to eI-mit. — -- P------- The exist_inq Shelburne Rd. curb cuts shall be closed. /i ;r•V;(„ 1 �)C )1 it';>O ii'Ci :.`� "i l�,Li''i aild' l-le Memorandum May 6, 1988 Page 2 3) BLODGETT, REVISED RETAIL/OFFICE COMPLEX Mr. Blodgett has redesigned the site plan approved July, 14, 1987 for a 29,424 square foot retail/office building on Shelburne Road. The new plan shows the driveway lined up with the IDX curb out. The plans also show two buildings connected by a second story walkaway. Chief Goddette feels the buildings should be consolidated into one building, or there should be.a thirty foot separation between buildings or a fire wall should be required. Two separate buildings are not allowed unless there are four acres but we could probably consider the second floor walkaway as one building. Parking: The plans show 154 parking spaces for 13,424 square feet of retail spaces and 16,000 square feet of general office space. Thirty one spaces (20.1%) are compact car spaces along the southern boundary. Setbacks: The rear yard setback is shown at less than the thirty feet required but this will be changed to thirty feet with a 24 foot wide fire lane prior to the meeting. Landscaping: A revised landscaping plan shows a number of evergreen and deciduous trees and wildflowers and perennials in the gardens in front of the building. Linden will be planted along the street side of the parking lot. The eastern edge of the parking lot shows wildflowers. An evergreen hedge should separate the commercial parking from the new residential units. A 15 foot evergreen buffer is required by the Ordinance. The plan is valued at approximately $7500 and includes small trees; $16,500 is required. Although the applicant wants credit, these trees have not been specified. Traffic: Under the old approval, the project was found to generate 95 trip ends. The entire 7.3 acre parcel was used to allow a maximum of 238 trip ends using the traffic overlay zone. Since the rear 4.5 acres will be subdivided, the front. 2.4 floes permit only 78 trip ends so the development. exceeds the overlay. However, when both projects are consider,od together, only: 108 trip ends will be generated which is under the overlay. Other: A sidewalk should be constructers a.lon.g Shelhtirne hoard. See Brill Szymanski's and Chief Goddett.e's comments. No mpoll�- i5e(sz- :�r&t C�;_Cev,,�D c Ifl,43, uo C, -VCQ-, c� ac CA 6wh-