Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-04-87 - Decision - 0046 Bowdoin StreetCITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT of PLANNING & ZONING THOMAS CHASE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-04-87 FINDINGS of FACT AND DECISION Thomas Chase, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 20, 300 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of site modifications to adjust parking layout and add a gravel path, 46 Bowdoin Street. The South Burlington Development Review Board held a public hearing on December 21, 2004. The applicant was present at the meeting. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS of FACT 1. The applicant is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 20, 300 sq ft general office building. The amendment consists of site modifications to adjust parking layout and add a gravel path, 46 Bowdoin Street. 2. The subject property is located in the Industrial & Open Space (10) Zoning District. 3. The record owner of the subject property is Chase Properties & Development. 4. The plan submitted consists of a plan entitled, "Office Building Lot 4 Meadowland Business Park So. Burlington, VT 05403 General Overall Site Plan", prepared by Walt Adams, dated March 20, 2002, last revised 11/11/04. 5. The Administrative Officer discovered that site modifications were made to the property without approval. The building has been occupied for about a year without a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) The C.O. could not be issued due to the changes made without approval. 6. The proposed parking layout will reduce the number of parking spaces by six (6). The original plans depicted a total of 118 parking spaces, five (5) of which were designated as handicapped -accessible. The proposed plans depict a total of 112 parking spaces, five (5) of which are designated as handicapped -accessible. Pursuant to Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations, the 20,300 square foot general office building on the subject property requires a minimum of seventy-two parking spaces. Thus, the 112 spaces proposed on the plan will be sufficient to meet the property's parking requirement. -1- 7. The proposed gravel path will connect the parking area to the southeasterly portion of the building. The size of the proposed path is very small in relation to the existing impervious surfaces, and therefore will not increase the overall coverage on the subject property, which is 49.4%. DECISION Motion by W A33 �C+�G�C seconded by to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-87 of Thomas Chase, subject to de following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed on the plat submitted by the applicant, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning. 3. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 4. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Chuck Bolton — e /nay/abstain/not present Mark Boucher — ea nay/abstain/not present John Dinklage nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — e nay/ bstain/not present Michele Kupersmith — e nay/abstain/not present Larry Kupferman — e nay/abstai resent Gayle Quimby — yea/nay/abstain of presen Motion carried by a vote of v2 - b - O Signed this day of December, 2004 by 1 _ +/i7tJoge, Ch1� Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -2-