The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-83-0000 - Supplemental - 1270 Shelburne RoadJune 28, 1983 Mr. J.L. .Davis 50 Corn erce Street Williston, Vermont 05495 Dear Mr. Davis: Be advised that your request for a zoning variance has been granted by the 76nina Hoard of Adjustment. The Board will issue form l findings at a later date. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Comanission. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard VIard, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg L,:l�lCi !'�'1� Ni; 'findings in ac(-ordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created bj the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is there re necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnece sary hardship has not been created by the appellant; EF (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t'c-ie public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �j Appeal # Date Appellant >%�5 Vote: Yes No Sign ---� A C. A. form t 9 5oM 7/7g JI)Ij�`l; .I' 1...1\�7`P/'.` ..�,��'IL`..I�rl.• 1�1_j�'.. rt�l,iU,.�I ...�\�� 'indings in areordanr( with Section 446P of the Planning h I ev(-1 opment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created bi the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located-7-47 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appell ant;- (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tr;e public welfare; and��'f (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Da t e Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings be w: a 2. Sign -,Q 3 �irndinrs in accordanc(, with "-cti_on W+6i' of the Planrrinv & I ow-lopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created bd the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (--P'I (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aopropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to trie public welfare; and 0" (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.J Appeal # v/ Date Appellant Vote: Yes G--�J'y No Sign L Li 1. 2. 3. ',iridings in ac(-ordancF, with :�ecti_on 440' of the Plan!�inr & I ov(-lopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b7 the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (` (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Ei (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.- Date -.,1- ,__ f� Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: /, , Appeal # Sign 4 i1;,'i .. ,;�'� findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & IovF,lopment Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b� the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; n"' (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjaceytoperty, nor be detrimental to tide public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Q Date Appellant al ' Vote: Yes Q List findings below: 2. No Appeal r, Sign }��Y 3 ,indin s in ace ordancF� with :>ection 446f of the Planr,ink, & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b7 the provisions of the zoning regulations in -the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (� L (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tie public welfare; and% (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plane. EJ Date�n r Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: 1 2 • Appeal # Sign--,' �, a 3