HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 06_SP-20-035_124 Technology Park Way_ReArchCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
SP‐20‐035‐CU‐20‐02_124 Technology Park
Way_ReArch_2020‐12‐15.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: December 9, 2020
Application received: November 20, 2020
124 Technology Park Way
Site Plan Application #SP‐20‐035
Meeting date: December 15, 2020
Applicant & Owner
124 Technology Park Way, LLC
88 Technology Park Way, Suite 2
South Burlington, VT 05403
Applicant
ReArch Company, c/o Stephen Savell
88 Technology Park Way, Suite 2
South Burlington, VT 05403
Engineer
Trudell Consulting Engineers
478 Blair Park Road
Williston, VT 054495
Property Information
Tax Parcel ID 1713‐00124
Mixed Industrial and Commercial District
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site plan application #SP‐20‐035 of ReArch Company to amend a previously approved plan for
commercial parking and a vacant 54,459 sf building. The amendment consists of converting the use to
general office and expanding the existing parking lot, 124 Technology Park Way.
The project was warned as follows.
Site plan application #SP‐20‐035 and Conditional use application #CU‐20‐02 of ReArch Company
to amend a previously approved plan for commercial parking and a vacant 54,459 sf building. The
amendment consists of converting the use to general office and expanding the existing parking
lot, 124 Technology Park Way.
Upon review of the submitted materials, Staff considers there are no elements of the proposal which
require conditional use review, therefore conditional use review has excluded from these staff comments.
CONTEXT
The Project is located in what is commonly referred to as Technology Park. The lots within Technology
Park are generally owned and managed by ReArch Company, but there is no unifying Planned Unit
Development. At present, Technology Park consists of the buildings at 124 and 88 Technology Park Way,
the large building at 530 Community Drive, and an existing smaller building at 725 Community Drive and
the currently under construction large warehouse at 635 Community Drive. Only the buildings at 124 and
88 Technology Park way and at 530 Community Drive are within the Community Drive “loop;” the other
two buildings are on the exterior of the loop.
The project also includes improvements to the stormwater management system. The application is
subject to conditional use review because a portion of the work is located within a Class II wetland buffer.
This project is subject to review under the Land Development Regulation Standards covering the Mixed
Industrial Commercial District, Section 12.02 Wetland Protection Standards, Section 14.06 General Review
Standards, and Section 14.10 Conditional uses.
PERMIT HISTORY
The existing site was originally approved in #SP‐07‐67 as a 54,459 general office building. That approval
granted certain encroachment into the Class II wetland buffer, finding that wetland criteria were being
met “to the best ability of the applicant.”
Most recently, the applicant received site plan approval #SP‐19‐14 and conditional use approval #CU‐19‐
03 to convert the use to commercial parking and vacant for the purpose of off‐site storage of automobiles
for sale. The applicant is now proposing to convert the existing building back to an office space and expand
the existing parking lot. The current application includes removal of the conditional approval for
commercial parking.
COMMENTS
Development Review Planner Marla Keene and Planning and Zoning Director Paul Conner have reviewed
the plans submitted on 11/20/2020 and offer the following comments. Numbered items for the Board’s
attention are in red.
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
A) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
IC Zoning District Required Existing Proposed
Min. Lot Size 40,000 sf 217,800 SF 217,800 sf
Max. Building Coverage 40 % 8.33% 8.33%
Max. Overall Coverage 70 % 44.5% 53.5%
@ Min. Front Setback 30 ft. Apprx. 400 ft. No change
Min. Side Setback 10 ft. Apprx. 54 ft. No change
Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. N/A N/A
Max. Front Setback Coverage 30% 16.3% 16.3%
Max. Height (flat roof)1 50 ft. 50 ft. No change
√ Zoning Compliance
@ Existing non‐conformity
1. Waiver from 35 to 50 ft granted in original approval SP‐07‐67
B) ARTICLE 12 SURFACE WATER PROTECTION STANDARDS
12.02E. Standards for Wetlands Protection
(1) Consistent with the purposes of this Section, encroachment into wetlands and buffer areas
is generally discouraged.
(2) Encroachment into Class II wetlands is permitted by the City only in conjunction with
issuance of a Conditional Use Determination (CUD) by the Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation and positive findings by the DRB pursuant to the criteria in (3) below.
(3) Encroachment into Class II wetland buffers, Class III wetlands and Class III wetland buffers,
may be permitted by the DRB upon finding that the proposed project’s overall development, erosion
control, stormwater treatment system, provisions for stream buffering, and landscaping plan
achieve the following standards for wetland protection:
(a) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store
flood waters adequately;
(b) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the proposed stormwater
treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards;
(c) The impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values
identified in the field delineation and wetland report is minimized and/or offset by appropriate
landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering, and/or other mitigation measures.
The project as proposed will result in approximately 1,750 sf (0.04 ac) of permanent Class II wetland
impact, approximately 10,900 sf (0.25 ac) of permanent Class II wetland buffer impact, and
approximately 3,050 sf (0.07 ac) of temporary wetland impact associated with landscaping. The
applicant is proposing a 4.8‐ft max height concrete block retaining wall to limit further
encroachment into the wetland beyond that described above. They have indicated in their
narrative that the wetland delineation has been approved by the state. However, no state
wetland permit has been provided, nor has the applicant provided a wetland report identifying
specific wetland functions and values. It appears that the applicant has submitted state wetland
permit 4122 and that permit application is under review.
1. Since the applicant has not provided any information to allow the Board to evaluate compliance
with these criteria, and there is no indication as to whether the State will approve the proposed
impacts, Staff considers it to be premature to make a determination the proposed impacts. Staff
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
considers the Board must receive and evaluate the wetland report and state wetland permit before
making a determination on these criteria.
C) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
14.6 General Review Standards
Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general
review standards for all site plan applications:
A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due
attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use
policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
The project is located in the northeast quadrant, whose objectives as stated in the comprehensive
plan are
Objective 52. Allow opportunities for employers in need of large amounts of space provided they
are compatible with the operation of the airport
Objective 53. Provide a balanced mix of recreation, resource conservation and business park
opportunities in the south end of the quadrant, to include the conservation of open space
resources, including riparian corridors along the tributaries of Muddy Brook and Potash Brook.
While this application does represent a proposal to amend an existing business park, it also proposes
to have permanent Class II wetland and wetland buffer impacts, as well as temporary wetland
impacts as described above. The watershed divide between Potash and Muddy Brooks is located on
the eastern side of the property, with the area proposed for development within a wetland which
discharges to Potash Brook on the west side of Community Drive. As noted pertaining to Surface
Water Protection standards, the applicant has not yet demonstrated State wetlands approval for
these impacts.
2. While Staff does not consider deficiencies in compliance with this criterion alone sufficient to deny the
application, Staff recommends the Board take into consideration this criterion when making their
determination.
B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement,
and adequate parking areas.
The proposed parking area necessitates removal of existing previously required vegetation,
discussed under 14.07D below. Since there are no minimum parking requirements for the
proposed use, and no other elements of this criterion are affected by this application, Staff
considers this criterion met.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a
public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
(b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one
or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The
Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below.
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
(i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act;
(ii) The parking area will serve a single or two‐family home;
(iii) The lot has unique site conditions, such as a utility easement or unstable soils, that
allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent to the public street;
(iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be re‐used and parking
needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s);
The original approval, #SP‐07‐67, found that the power lines and related easement on the
norther portion of the property made it impractical to locate the building up front. That
approval also considered the significant landscaping between Kimball Ave and the parking lot
in the finding on this criterion. Staff considers the circumstances leading to the original
approval have not changed, but does question the necessity of additional parking.
In their application narrative, the applicant indicated that the future user of the site,
Government Services Administration (GSA), has requested 250 parking spaces. They indicate
that GSA originally requested 316 parking spaces within a quarter mile of the building. Staff
estimates the existing building at 730 Community Drive has at least 800 parking spaces, and
is located within a quarter mile of the building on the subject property. The building at 730
Community Drive is nearly fully occupied (2,160 sf is undesignated) and there appears to be
excess parking available. Therefore Staff considers that by the applicant’s own statement,
the requested additional parking is above the “minimum necessary to overcome the
conditions” preventing the applicant from locating parking to the rear.
Parking standards provide additional exceptions for parking in the rear for properties in the
Mixed IC zoning district, if the lot is located in an approved subdivision where the parking on
each lot in the subdivision is proposed to be located between the building or buildings on
each lot and the public street so that a significant greenspace surrounded by buildings may
be incorporated similar to a college campus style “quad.” In order to qualify for this
exemption, the applicant must present a plan for such a quad specifically defining it’s size and
extents, and providing a high quality design of such green space. Since the applicant has not
done so, Staff considers this exemption does not apply.
3. Staff considers that the above considerations regarding proximity of additional parking, taken
in aggregate with the extensive wetland impacts necessitated by the proposed parking
expansion, represent too many obstacles to recommend approval of the expansion, and
recommends the Board discuss.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and
scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining
buildings.
No building changes are proposed. Staff considers this criterion not applicable.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall apply:
A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for
provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to
reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for
emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
No changes to access are proposed. Staff considers that reservation of land for reducing curb cuts is
not required, and considers this criterion met.
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire‐served utility lines and service connections
shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility
installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to
neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.13, Utility Services, shall also be met.
Overhead utilities traverse the site but the building itself is served by underground utilities. Staff considers
compliance with this criterion not diminished by this application.
C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and
properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s).
Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non‐dumpster, non‐large drum) shall
not be required to be fenced or screened.
Dumpsters are not proposed to be changed and are enclosed.
D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening,
and Street Trees.
As alluded to above, the applicant is proposing to remove some trees which were included on the
previously approved site plan. Because no changes to the building are proposed, the only required
landscaping is that necessary to compensate for the removed landscaping. The applicant has proposed
to compensate for the removed landscaping by planting new trees and shrubs, some of which are the
same species as those removed, and others which are different species.
For shrubs, the applicant is proposing to replace each removed shrub with one of the same kind of shrub,
installed at a 3 gallon size.
For trees, the applicant describes in their narrative that new species have been selected for specific site
conditions, including soils, water availability, salt, and sun exposure. The applicant has calculated the
required value of new species based on a valuation of existing trees to be removed using the Purdue
University’s Department of Horticulture ad Cooperative Extension Service guidance for appraising and
calculating the monetary value of landscape plants. Given the layout of the remainder of the site, Staff
considers the applicant’s proposal results in a well landscaped site.
The City Arborist reviewed the plans on 12/1/2020 and indicated there are no issues.
The applicant is proposing 51 new parking spaces. Above‐noted nonconforming issues notwithstanding,
if the Board elects to allow the proposed expansion, 13.06B(2) requires all parking areas of 28 or more
parking spaces to contain 10% interior parking lot landscaping. Staff recommends the Board require the
applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion.
13.06B(4) requires one major deciduous shade tree within or near the perimeter of each parking area for
every five (5) parking spaces. Staff considers this criterion met for the affected portion of the parking lot.
E. Modification of Standards. Except within the City Center Form Based Code District, where the
limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and
waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board
may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive
Plan are met. However, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five
(5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a
total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new
development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre‐existing condition exceeds the
applicable limit.
Staff considers that no modification of standards is necessary.
F Low Impact Development. The use of low impact site design strategies that minimize site
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
disturbance, and that integrate structures, landscaping, natural hydrologic functions, and various other
techniques to minimize runoff from impervious surfaces and to infiltrate precipitation into underlying
soils and groundwater as close as is reasonable practicable to where it hits the ground, is required
pursuant to the standards contained within Article 12.
The Assistant Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the application on December 3, 2020 and offers the
following comments.
The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “124 Technology Park Way” sketch plan prepared by
Trudell Consulting Engineers, dated 11/04/2020. We would like to offer the following comments:
1. The proposed project will discharge to Potash Brook. This watershed is listed as stormwater
impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
2. The applicant has acknowledged that they must comply with the 3‐9050 permit. In addition,
due to the amount of impervious being created on the entire parcel, the applicant must
comply with Section 12.03 of the LDR’s. The applicant is requested to provide the following
requirements in Section 12.03(D) of the City’s Land Development Regulations (LDRs):
a. Sub‐watershed boundaries and drainage area delineations for all stormwater
treatment practices.
b. Soil types and / or hydrologic soil group, including the results of any soil borings,
infiltration testing, or soil compaction testing.
c. A detailed maintenance plan for all proposed stormwater treatment practices
including the Stormfilter vault system and PhosphoSorb® media replacement.
3. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land. It will therefore require a
construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. Did the applicant determine
that this project is a Low Risk project
4. Sheet C5‐01 is difficult to read in terms of EPSC requirements. Please remove unnecessary
layers so that line types are distinguishable. Additionally, locations (not inclusive) such as
stabilized construction entrance, staging areas (including materials and snow), and limits of
disturbance fencing should be clearly depicted. Is dewatering anticipated for construction?
Please include EPSC narrative.
5. Applicant is requested to depict the Dry Detention Pond referenced in the narrative on the
plans. Please show pertinent details.
6. The Stormfilter vault system General Note 5 mentions the depth to SHW as well. Provide any
soil borings or test pits to confirm soil types and groundwater elevation on site.
7. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all
stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure.
4. Because the comments of the City Stormwater Section state, in effect, that the Assistant Stormwater
Superintendent can’t complete their review without further information, Staff shared the comments
with the applicant as soon as they were available. The applicant is working with the Assistant
Stormwater Superintendent to address these comments and Staff anticipates they will have an
update at the time of the hearing.
5. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address the comments of the Assistant
Stormwater Superintendent prior to closing the hearing.
G. Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation. Standards of Section 15.12 Standards for
Roadways, Parking, and Circulation shall be met.
Dimensional requirements of 15.12 are met for the affected portion of the site. No review of the unaffected
portions of the site has been undertaken.
SP‐20‐35
Staff Comments
D) OTHER
13.14 Bicycle Parking and Storage
The 54,459 sf building is required to have 11 short‐term bicycle parking spaces. The applicant notes in
their cover letter the site was previously approved with 10 short term bicycle parking spaces. Existing
bicycle parking is not shown on the provided plans. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to
demonstrate the provision of 11 short‐term bicycle parking spaces meeting the standards of 13.14,
including placement on a stabilized surface.
13.07 Exterior Lighting
Eight new lights are proposed at a mounting height of 20.5 feet. Lights are proposed to be downcast and
shielded, and the average illumination level in the affected area is 1.8 footcandles. Staff considers lighting
criterion met.
Traffic
The applicant estimates the proposed use will generate 63 trips during the PM peak hour. The original
approval for the property approved 159 trips. Staff considers no additional traffic impact fee is required.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the applicant work with Staff and the Development Review Board to address the
issues herein.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802 879 6331www.tcevt.com42 Mapleville Depot Road St. Albans, VT 05478 802 528 5116
Civil Engineering Environmental Services Land Surveying Landscape Architecture
November 12, 2020
Marla Keene, P.E.
Development Review Planner
Department of Planning & Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
RE: 19-099 Site Plan Application for Parking Expansion – 124 Technology Park Way
South Burlington, VT
Dear Marla,
Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) is submitting this Site Plan Application and Conditional
Use Application on behalf of the Applicant, ReArch Company, for a proposed 59 space
parking expansion for 124 Technology Park Way, herby referred to as the “project”. The
project proposes this parking expansion due to a requirement of a tenant for 250
parking spaces to be located on the same property as the office building. In addition,
the application proposes to remove Commercial Parking use from the property and
proposes changes to stormwater treatment and landscaping, requiring Site Plan
Review. As the parking lot expansion involves Class II wetland impact the project also
requires Conditional Use Review. There are no proposed changes to the setbacks,
existing building, site access, water supply, or wastewater disposal.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me
directly at (802) 879-6331 x107 or by email at abby.dery@tcevt.com.
Sincerely,
Abigail Dery, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802 879 6331www.tcevt.com42 Mapleville Depot Road St. Albans, VT 05478 802 528 5116
Civil Engineering Environmental Services Land Surveying Landscape Architecture
19-099 REARCH PARKING EXPANSION124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SOUTH BURLINGTON,VTSITEPLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEWNOVEMBER2020
1
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) is submitting this Site Plan Application and Conditional
Use Application on behalf of the Applicant, ReArch Company, for a proposed 59 space
parking expansion for 124 Technology Park Way, herby referred to as the “project”. The
project proposes this parking expansion due to a requirement of a tenant for 250
parking spaces to be located on the same property as the office building. In addition,
the application proposes to remove Commercial Parking use from the property and
proposes changes to stormwater treatment and landscaping. There are no proposed
changes to the setbacks, the existing building, site access, water supply, wastewater
treatment or lighting.
The project property is an existing 5.0 ac property located at 124 Technology Park Way
with frontage along Kimball Avenue. The site was previously permitted for the
construction of an office building, associated parking lot, stormwater treatment areas,
and other utilities in 2007. In 2019, the applicant proposed to use the site for
Commercial Parking while the office building sat vacant. At this time, the applicant
proposes a change in use for the site back to general office use with a proposed 59
space parking expansion. The peak days and hours of operation will be Monday
through Friday from 6am to 6pm.
Site Plan Review (14.03) & Mixed Industrial Commercial District (6.01)
Per Section 14.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any change in
use for properties outside the form-based code district as well as a parking expansion,
require Site Plan Approval. Per Section 6.01 and Table C-1 Commercial and Public
General Office is a permitted use within the Mixed Industrial-Commercial District (IC).
The only dimensional standards listed in Table C-2 for the IC which will change as a
result of the proposed project is the total site coverage which is proposed to increase
from 44.5% to 53.5% with the addition of the 0.45 ac, 59 space parking expansion. This
proposed coverage is well below the maximum allowed 70% lot coverage in the IC.
Transit Overlay District (10.05)
The project is within the Transit Overlay District, however, there is no proposed change
to existing sidewalk connections or transit to and from the site. The site was previously
approved for general office with 54,459 SF of gross floor area (GFA) and traffic
generation numbers have not changed since that approval, however, have increased
478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802 879 6331www.tcevt.com42 Mapleville Depot Road St. Albans, VT 05478 802 528 5116
Civil Engineering Environmental Services Land Surveying Landscape Architecture
19-099 REARCH PARKING EXPANSION124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SOUTH BURLINGTON,VTSITEPLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEWNOVEMBER2020
2
from the most recent Commercial Parking use. Peak traffic generation based on the ITE
10th Generation Manual for 54,459 GFA for general office is 63 AM trips and 63 PM trips.
Off-Street Parking & Loading (13.01) & Bicycle Parking (13.14)
The site had been previously approved for a General Office use with 54,459 GFA with
an approved 191 parking spaces, 6 accessible parking spaces, 9 fuel efficient vehicle
spaces, and 10 bicycle parking spaces. With this application, the applicant proposes
only to increase the standard parking spaces by 59 for a total of 250 spaces.
In Spring of 2019, 124 Technology Park Way, LLC entered into a Lease Agreement with
Government Services Administration (GSA) for all the 54,408 sf of space within the office
building located at 124 Technology Park Way in South Burlington for a 10 year base
term. As part of the initial lease agreement GSA requested 316 parking spaces at the
location or within a quarter mile of the building. There are currently 191 parking spaces
on the current lot and they we were hoping to provide the additional spots within one
of the parking lots at 55 Community Drive or 30 Community Drive. GSA did not accept
this permanently given the distance and Tech Park did not want to encumber other
buildings with additional parking requirements for 124 TPW building. They were then
able to negotiate with GSA and have a Lease Amendment signed (attached) reducing
the number of required parking spaces from 316 to 250, assuming they are able to
construct the additional 59 on the premises. They had already been successful is
pushing to reduce their initial parking requirement. GSA has an employee count that
will support the additional space when up and running.
The proposed parking area expansion is located between the existing building and
existing parking area and will square off the existing parking lot as infill development.
Due to the existing development, this is the preferred location for the parking expansion
as the only other potential location would expand parking further towards Kimball Ave
and have a more significant effect on the existing parking lot circulation. The parking
expansion will be screened by additional plantings between the parking area and both
Kimball Ave and Community Drive. Under Section 14.06B(2)(b)(iv) of the Land
Development Regulations, the DRB may approve parking between a building and
public street if parking cannot be provided to the rear or side of a building due to the
building being existing. Additionally, the future Technology Park development plans
may be considered a campus style “quad” with significant green space between
buildings as per Section 14.06B(2)(b)(v).
19-099 REARCH PARKING EXPANSION124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SOUTH BURLINGTON,VTSITEPLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEWNOVEMBER2020
3
Wetland Protection Standards and Review Procedures (12.02)
A class II wetland exists on the property and is proposed to be impacted by the parking
expansion, requiring wetland permitting from the State and a Conditional Use Approval
from the City. TCE performed a wetland delineation in late August of 2020, which has
been approved by the State and is depicted, along with a 50’ buffer, on all design
plans. As the project proposes to square off the existing parking area, with a minimum
increase of 59 spaces, wetland and wetland buffer impact is unavoidable. In total, the
project proposes 0.04 ac of wetland impact, 0.25 ac of wetland buffer impact and 0.07
ac of temporary impact associated with landscaping.
All wetland and wetland buffer impact are illustrated on the attached Wetland Impact
Plan (E1-01). Note that plantings within existing fill within the buffer are not considered
impact. Due to the existing development and landscaping on the property,
landscaping must be proposed within the wetland buffer. As described in additional
narrative below, landscaping has been selected to best survive within the wetland
buffer. Proposed wetland and wetland buffer impacts have been minimized through
subsurface stormwater treatment and the use of a retaining wall to limit grading.
Impacts to potential flood storage and stormwater treatment provided by the wetland
are mitigated from the proposed stormwater treatment system described below. The
applicant is applying for an Individual Wetland Impact permit concurrently with this
application.
Stormwater Management (12.03)
Due to the expanded impervious area and the proposed removal of a stormwater
treatment practice, the project proposes changes to the on-site stormwater treatment
system requiring State and local review. The project site is currently permitted under
State stormwater permit 1-1458.0011 which includes discharges from both 88 and 124
Technology Park Way. Under the State permit, the first inch of runoff from both
properties is treated within one of two treatment wetlands on 124 Technology Park Way
with detention of the larger rain events within a Detention Pond/Class II Wetland with
discharge to the stormwater impaired Potash Brook. While no changes are proposed to
the stormwater wetland associated with 88 Technology Park Way, the project does
propose to remove the stormwater wetland which treats runoff from 124 Technology
Park Way an provide upgraded treatment for the full water quality volume associated
with 124 Technology Park Way.
The project property, 124 Technology Park Way, is currently developed with 2.15 ac of
impervious surfaces between rooftop and parking areas and the project proposes to
19-099 REARCH PARKING EXPANSION124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SOUTH BURLINGTON,VTSITEPLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEWNOVEMBER2020
4
add 0.45 ac of impervious parking for a total of 2.60 ac impervious. As this project site
also falls under jurisdiction of the 3-ac (3-9050) stormwater regulations, the proposed
stormwater system has been designed for full compliance with these regulations,
bringing all 2.60 ac up to current regulations. The project proposes to replace the
existing stormwater wetland with a stormwater treatment system developed by
Contech called the StormFilter. The StormFilter is a pre-approved treatment device by
the State Stormwater Program and is ranked for Tier 2 removal rates. The StormFilter is
designed to treat the 1”, 24-hour rain event (WQv) from all impervious surfaces. In
addition to the StormFilter the project proposes 8,950 CF of upstream detention within
42” storage pipe below the proposed parking expansion. Pre-treatment for the
expanded impervious areas is provided by three deep sump catch basins.
Runoff during rain events larger than the 1” storm from existing impervious will continue
to bypass water quality treatment and will discharge to the existing dry detention pond
for detention of the 1-year and 10-year rain events . Runoff from the proposed parking
expansion will flow to the sub-surface detention and StormFilter during large rain events
and will discharge to the dry detention pond for additional detention. The applicant is
applying for a State stormwater permit concurrently with this permit application. The
Stormwater Plan (C4-01) and subsequent detail sheets (C8-02 and C8-03) further
illustrate the proposed stormwater treatment.
Landscaping (13.06)
The proposed parking lot expansion involves the removal of several trees and shrubs
that are required to be replaced per section 13.06(I.) Landscape Maintenance in South
Burlington’s Land Development Regulations (LDRs). First, the trees proposed to be
removed were identified by species and their current size in Diameter at Breast Height
(DBH) was documented. With this information, the trees proposed to be removed were
evaluated for what replacements would be made. Per the LDRs, replacements are
proposed as either (a) in kind replacement that replace trees with the same species, or
(b) value replacements. Value replacements have been determined by using the
Purdue University’s Department of Horticulture ad Cooperative Extension Service
guidance for appraising and calculating the monetary value of landscape plants.
Specifically, this methodology is outlined in Landscape Tree Appraisal by Michael N.
Dana (Rev 3/00), and Tree Appraisal and the Value of Trees by Lindsey Purcell and
Jeffrey Ling (2019).
The Landscape Plan (LA-01) illustrates the proposed landscape planting that utilizes
both in kind replacements and value replacements. A varied list of tree species is
proposed to promote a diverse species make up on the site, while maintaining the
19-099 REARCH PARKING EXPANSION124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SOUTH BURLINGTON,VTSITEPLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE REVIEWNOVEMBER2020
5
current landscape aesthetic onsite. New plantings have been located around the new
parking area and in areas there are currently gaps in planted areas, or where
additional plantings would bolster existing plant groups. New species (i.e. plantings
proposed as value replacements, not in kind replacements) have been selected for
specific site conditions, including soils, water availability, salt, sun exposure, etc.
Plantings in the wetland buffer areas tolerate wet soils, and plantings near the
stormwater basins are appropriate for varying soil moisture levels. The LA-01 Landscape
Plan represents the total replacements (using in kind and value metrics) required based
on South Burlington’s LDRs.
Construction & Opinion of Probable Cost
The project is expected to go through local and State permitting within the 2020/2021
winter with an expected construction start in the Spring of 2021. The proposed
construction involves approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill, however, the need for
imported material is significantly reduced due to the subsurface stormwater treatment
areas. While the project does not require a State Construction General Permit,
construction will comply with the Low Risk Handbook and silt fence will be installed
down gradient from all disturbance as shown on the attached plans. Total expected
construction cost is $500,000 and should be complete by Fall 2021 if not sooner.
SSSSSSSSSSSD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
D
D
D
DDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDD
D
D
D
DDDDD
D
D
D
D
D WWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
W
WFDFDFDSSSSSUPUP(2)UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP
UP
UP
UP CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPCTV
CTV
CTVCTV
CTV
CTV
CTV
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT
UT
UPSSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
S
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
S(2)
(2)
(2
)
(2
)
(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)(2)(2)(2)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDDD
D
DSMH 3
RIM=343.3
iIN(E)(8)=339.6
iOUT=339.5
DMHRIM=339.32
iIN=335.39
iOUT=335.34SUMP=334.82
WETLAND OUTLET
RIM=336.21
iIN(3 PIPES)=334.23
iOUT=334.03SUMP=331.71
CB
RIM = 345.10'
CLASS 2
WETLAND
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER (
S
T
A
T
E
& LOCA
L
)SHUNPIKE RDKIMBALL AV
E
N
U
E
45' SETBACK17.5'SETBACK 65' SETBACK17.5'SETBACK
124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY
EXISTING BUILDING CONCRETE SIDEWALKSTORMWATER SYSTEM
DMH #9RIM=342.94
iIN(15)=335.30
iIN(12)=335.94
iOUT(18)=335.12
18
"
H
D
P
E
15" HDPECB #5
RIM=342.61
iIN=337.0
iOUT=336.4
CB #6
RIM=343.8
iIN(12)=338.6
iIN(4)=339.2
iOUT=338.3
DMH #1RIM=347.43iIN(x2)=340.60
iIN(8)=340.50
iOUT=340.53
12" HDPE
CB #10
RIM=339.89
iOUT=336.49SUMP=334.14
CB #11RIM=337.08
iIN(15)=334.03
iOUT(18SW)=333.33
iOUT(12W)=????SUMP=330.58
15"
HDPE18" HDPE
12" HDP
E
WETLAND
OUTLETRIM=334.21
iIN(3X3")=332.71
iOUT=331.41
SUMP=330.71
12" HD
P
E
CB #4
RIM=336.26i(2)=333.68
iOUT=333.45
SUMP=330.9
2"
P
VC
12" HDP
E
DMH #8RIM=339.51
iIN(8)=334.21
iIN(12)=333.16
iOUT=332.88SUMP=332.46 12" HDPE8" PVCi=332.66
12" HDPE
i=342.5912"HDPE8" PVCCB
RIM = 347.0'
CB
RIM = 348.7'
CB
RIM = 345.1'
CB
RIM = 344.2'
CBRIM = 346.25'
18" = 336.86
15"S = 336.96
15"E = 339.748" = 340
CB
RIM = 350.0'
YD
RIM = 346.9'
YDRIM = 347.2'
ELECTRIC PAD
CONDUIT FORTELECOM PAD
12" YARD DRAIN
i=375.9
8" PVC8"PVC6" PVCL=249' s=0.004 FT/FT8" PVCL=144' s=0.004 FT/FT8" PVCL=137' s=0.0
0
3
F
T
/
F
T
8" PVC
L=176' s=0.
0
0
4
F
T
/
F
T
8" PVC12"HDPEi=334.20
i=334.00
SMH 5RIM=348.26iOUT=340.91
iIN=340.83
SMH 1 (ASSUMED INV)
RIM=348.51
iIN(SW)(8)=338.08iOUT=337.98
SMH 2
RIM=344.83
iIN(S)(8)=339.16iOUT=339.06
SMH 4RIM=346.20
iIN(E)(8)=340.20
iOUT=340.20
i=333.71
H
V
A
C
ELECTRIC
PULLBOX
TBMTCE POINT #22366"X" TOP OF BOLT
ELEV.=341.63
i=333.60
8" CLASS 5
2
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
APPROX.
LOCATION
FLAGPOLE
TECHNOLO
G
Y
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
12" HDPE
12" HDPE
DD
9
3
30
13
21
22
22
35
32
50'
WETLAND
BUFFER 35235135
1350
350
350
3
4
9
349
34
9
3493483
4
8
348347347347346346346345345345344
344344344343
343 343342
342342342
341
341
341 341341
340
340340
339 339339
338 338338338
338
337
337
33
7
337337
3363
3
6 3363363
3
5
335335
335
3
3
4
334334
334
333
333333332tax map no. 1260-00200
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v.
898 p. 210
map slide 510map slide 541
9.10 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 p. 210
map slide 510
map slide 541
7.90 Ac.
tax map no. 1713-00124TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC
v. 812 p. 269
map slide 5105.00 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC
v. 898 p. 210map slide 510
map slide 541
3.98 Ac.
0
Feet
Graphic Scale
30 30 60 90 120
15°±VT GridMagneticSheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
No. 9020CIVILABIGAIL A. D
E
R
YSTATE O F VERM
O
N
T
PROF
ESSIONAL
E N G INEERLICEN S E D
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
NOTES:
Existing Conditions
Plan
C1-01
11/04/2020
1" = 30'
19-099
RMP
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont2012100
1. AERIAL IMAGERY FROM VERMONT CENTER FOR GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (2018).
2. PLANT INVENTORY BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MAY 13, 2019.
3. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE BASED ON
RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS, AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE ENCOUNTERED AND WERE
OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVENOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOTSHOWN MAY EXIST. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE ENCOUNTERED. ACTUAL
LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY VARY. DIGSAFE MUST BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO ANY
EXCAVATION. CALL 1-888-DIG SAFE (344-7233).UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ABOVE
GROUND STRUCTURES AND PLANS OF RECORD. ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LINES MAY VARY.
4. THE WETLAND DELINEATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WAS PERFORMED ON 08/26/2020, ACCORDING TOSTANDARDS OF THE 1987 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE 2012 REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT. THIS
DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY BRITTANY LEBEAU OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
5. BOUNDARY BASED ON SUBDIVISION PLAT BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION PLAT,
TECHNOLOGY PARK, 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE, SO. BURLINGTON, VT" DATED 10/30/14.
6. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS CONDUCTED IN 2007, 2012, 2018,2019 AND 2020.
7. TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE = 47.43%.
2
89
PROJECT LOCATION
SSSSSSSSSSSSSD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
D
DDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDD
D
D
D
DDDDD
D
D
D
D
D WWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
FD
FD
FDFDFDFDFD SSSSSUP
UP
UP
UP(2)UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP
UP
UP
UP CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPCTVCTV
CTVCTV
CTV
CTV
CTV
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
U
T
(
2
)
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UDFD
FD
FDUT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT
UPSSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
S(2)
(2)
(2)
(2
)
(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)(2)(2)(2)UT(2)D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDDD
D
DCLASS 2WETLAND SHUNPIKE RDKIMBALL AV
E
N
U
E
124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY
EXISTING BUILDING CONCRETE SIDEWALKSTORMWATER SYSTEM
12"HDPEAPPROX.
LOCATION
FLAGPOLE
TECHNOLOG
Y
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
D
D
13
11
14 13
9
3
30
13
21
22
22
35
32
DDDDD
D
D
D
50'
WETLAND
BUFFER
FD 35135
1350
350
3
4
9
349
34
93483
4
8
348347347347346346346345345345344
344344344343
343 343342
342342342
341
341
341 341341
340
340340
339 339339339
338 338338338
338
337
337
33
7
337337337
3363363
3
6 336336336
3
3
5
335335
335
3
3
5
3343
3
4
334334
334
333333
333333332TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC
v. 898 p. 210map slide 510
map slide 541
4.49 Ac.
tax map no. 1260-00200
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v.
898 p. 210map slide 510
map slide 541
9.10 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 p. 210
map slide 510
map slide 5417.90 Ac.
tax map no. 1713-00124
TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC
v. 812 p. 269
map slide 5105.00 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLCv. 898 p. 210
map slide 510
map slide 541
3.98 Ac.
TBM
TCE POINT #22366
"X" TOP OF BOLTELEV.=341.63
OVERLAY
PROPOSED PARKING EXPANSION(SHOWN SHADED)18'9'24'D0
Feet
Graphic Scale
30 30 60 90 120
15°±VT GridMagneticSheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
No. 9020CIVILABIGAIL A. D
E
R
YSTATE O F VERM
O
N
T
PROF
ESSIONAL
E N G INEERLICEN S E D
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
1 XX/XX/XX XXXRevisions to Plan
Overall Site Plan
C2-01
11/04/2020
1" = 30'
19-099
RMP
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont2012100
PROJECT INFORMATION
OWNER: 124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, LLC
88 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY, SUITE 2
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
PHONE: (802) 863-8727
ZONE: MIXED INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL
TOTAL LOT SIZE:217,800 SF 5.0 AC
BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 18,153 SF
BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA: 54,459 SF
TOTAL EXISTING PARKING SPACES FOR APPROVED OFFICE: 191ACCESSIBLE SPACES: 6FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLE SPACES: 9
BICYCLE SPACES: 10
TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING SPACES:250
LOT COVERAGE:EXISTING PROPOSED
BUILDING: 8.33% 8.33%ALL IMPERVIOUS: 44.5% 53.5%
FRONT YARD: 16.3% 16.3%
2
89
PROJECT LOCATION
PROJECT AREA
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
WW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDUP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
CB #11
RIM=337.08
iIN(15)=334.03
iOUT(18SW)=333.33
iOUT(12W)=????
SUMP=330.58
15"
HDPE
2"
P
VC 8" PVCTBM
TCE POINT #22366
"X" TOP OF BOLT
ELEV.=341.63
12" HDP
E
D
13
11
14
13
13
35
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
CONCRETE BLOCKRETAINING WALL
T.W. = 338.5B.W. = 335.0
T.W. = 337.8B.W. = 333.5
T.W. = 337.8B.W. = 333.0
T.W. = 339.0B.W. = 337.0
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (0.60 AC)
STORMFILTERRIM = 338.0
iIN (12) = 333.17iOUT (12) = 332.42
DMH #2ARIM = 338.6iIN (12N) = 334.8iIN (12S) = 333.4iIN (18NE) = 333.4iOUT (18W) = 333.37SUMP = 329.37
DEEP SUMP PRE-TREATMENTCB #2ARIM = 337.4iOUT (12) = 334.67SUMP = 330.67
DMH #1ARIM = 339.4iIN (8S) = 334.02ASSUMEDiIN (12SW) = 333.88iOUT (12N) = 333.85iOUT (12W) = 334.60SUMP = 331.85
iOUT (18SW) = 333.65iOUT (12W) = 334.65
DEEP SUMP TREATMENTCB #1ARIM = 338.2
iOUT (12) = 335.2SUMP = 331.2
CO #1
i = 334.2 341339338337336336 335
334
333tax map no. 1713-00124TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC v. 812 p. 269
map slide 510
5.00 Ac.
TBM
TCE POINT #22366
"X" TOP OF BOLT
ELEV.=341.63
12" HDPE
S
=
0.
0
0
518'9'24'CONCRETE CURB(TYPICAL)
12" HDPE S=0.005
SA
W
C
U
T
SA
W
C
U
T12" HDPE12" HDPE S=0.005CONCRETE CURBTO BE REPLACEDIF NEEDED
18" HDPE S=0.005DDDD12" HDPE S=0.005D18" HDPE
SAWCUT
SAWCUT
INSTALL TREEPROTECTION
INSTALL TREE PROTECTION
0
Feet
Graphic Scale
10 10 20 30 40
15°±VT GridMagneticSheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
No. 9020CIVILABIGAIL A. D
E
R
YSTATE O F VERM
O
N
T
PROF
ESSIONAL
E N G INEERLICEN S E D
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
1 XX/XX/XX XXXRevisions to Plan
Site Plan
C2-02
11/04/2020
1" = 10'
19-099
RMP
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont20121002
89
PROJECT LOCATION
SSSSSSSSSSSD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DD
D
D
D
D
DDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDD
D
D
D
DDDDD
D
D
D
D
D WWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
W
W
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
FD
FD
FDFDFDFDFD SSSSSUP
UP(2)UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP
UP
UP
UP CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPCTV
CTV
CTVCTV
CTV
CTV
CTV
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
U
T
(
2
)
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
FD
FD
FDUT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT
UT
UPSSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
S
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
S(2)
(2)
(2
)
(2
)
(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)(2)(2)(2)UT(2)D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDDD
D
DSMH 3
RIM=343.3
iIN(E)(8)=339.6
iOUT=339.5
DMHRIM=339.32
iIN=335.39
iOUT=335.34SUMP=334.82
WETLAND OUTLET
RIM=336.21
iIN(3 PIPES)=334.23
iOUT=334.03SUMP=331.71
CB
RIM = 345.10'
CLASS 2
WETLAND
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER (
S
T
A
T
E
& LOCA
L
)SHUNPIKE RDKIMBALL AV
E
N
U
E
45' SETBACK17.5'SETBACK 65' SETBACK17.5'SETBACK
124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY
EXISTING BUILDING CONCRETE SIDEWALKSTORMWATER SYSTEM
DMH #9RIM=342.94
iIN(15)=335.30
iIN(12)=335.94
iOUT(18)=335.12
18
"
H
D
P
E
15" HDPECB #5
RIM=342.61
iIN=337.0
iOUT=336.4
CB #6
RIM=343.8
iIN(12)=338.6
iIN(4)=339.2
iOUT=338.3
DMH #1RIM=347.43iIN(x2)=340.60
iIN(8)=340.50
iOUT=340.53
12" HDPE
CB #10
RIM=339.89
iOUT=336.49SUMP=334.14
CB #11RIM=337.08
iIN(15)=334.03
iOUT(18SW)=333.33
iOUT(12W)=????SUMP=330.58
15"
HDPE18" HDPE
12" HDP
E
WETLAND
OUTLETRIM=334.21
iIN(3X3")=332.71
iOUT=331.41
SUMP=330.71
12" HD
P
E
CB #4
RIM=336.26i(2)=333.68
iOUT=333.45
SUMP=330.9
2"
P
VC
12" HDP
E
DMH #8RIM=339.51
iIN(8)=334.21
iIN(12)=333.16
iOUT=332.88SUMP=332.46 12" HDPE8" PVCi=332.66
12" HDPE
i=342.5912"HDPE8" PVCCB
RIM = 347.0'
CB
RIM = 348.7'
CB
RIM = 345.1'
CB
RIM = 344.2'
CBRIM = 346.25'
18" = 336.86
15"S = 336.96
15"E = 339.748" = 340
CB
RIM = 350.0'
YD
RIM = 346.9'
YDRIM = 347.2'
ELECTRIC PAD
CONDUIT FORTELECOM PAD
12" YARD DRAIN
i=375.9
8" PVC8"PVC6" PVCL=249' s=0.004 FT/FT8" PVCL=144' s=0.004 FT/FT8" PVCL=137' s=0.0
0
3
F
T
/
F
T
8" PVC
L=176' s=0.
0
0
4
F
T
/
F
T
8" PVC12"HDPEi=334.20
i=334.00
SMH 5RIM=348.26iOUT=340.91
iIN=340.83
SMH 1 (ASSUMED INV)
RIM=348.51
iIN(SW)(8)=338.08iOUT=337.98
SMH 2
RIM=344.83
iIN(S)(8)=339.16iOUT=339.06
SMH 4RIM=346.20
iIN(E)(8)=340.20
iOUT=340.20
i=333.71
HVAC
ELECTRIC
PULLBOX
i=333.60
8" CLASS 5
2
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
APPROX.
LOCATION
FLAGPOLE
TECHNOLO
G
Y
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
12" HDPE
12" HDPE
10" AF
6" AF
3 CR TO REMAIN
2 CR
2 IV
1 IV
1 IVJ
2 MS 3 PG
2 PS
2 AR
3 MS
3 PG
2 AC
1 AR
1 PG 3 PS
2 PN 3 PS
1 IVJ 2 IV
3 AC
1 MS
2 AC
9 PG
2 GT
5 SP
1 CS
8 CS
2 AC
2 AC
3 CR
2 AC
3 CS
8 GT
10" QP
6 SP TO
REMAIN
2 GT
8 SR
3 SR
1 PG
8" FIR
6" WHITE PINE
1 PN
1 PS
1 PG
2 PN
1 PS
62 JH
(3) 4" QP (4) 4" QP
81 JH
26 FR
30 FR
81 JH
1 IV
1 PG
1 PS
1 PG
5 SP
57 FR
6" PG
10" AF
8" AF
4" AF
8" AR8" AR
6" AR
6" AF
2 SP
8" AF
(2) 2" AC TO REMAIN
44 FR
61 JH
3 SR
4" SR
TO REMAIN
3 SP
4"
4"4"
4" QP
9
3
30
13
21
22
22
35
32
50'
WETLAND
BUFFER
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (0.60 AC)35235135
1350
350
350
3
4
9
349
34
9
3493483
4
8
348347347347346346346345345345344
344344344343
343 343342
342342342
341
341
341 341341
340
340340
339 339339
338 338338338
338
337
337
33
7
337337
3363
3
6 3363363
3
5
335335
335
3
3
4
334334
334
333
333333332tax map no. 1260-00200
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v.
898 p. 210
map slide 510map slide 541
9.10 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 p. 210
map slide 510
map slide 541
7.90 Ac.
tax map no. 1713-00124TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC
v. 812 p. 269
map slide 5105.00 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC
v. 898 p. 210map slide 510
map slide 541
3.98 Ac.
TO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVED
TO BE REMOVED TO BE RE
M
OVED
TO BE REM
O
V
E
D
12" HDPE & 6" PVCTO BE REMOVED
TREE TO BE REMOVED
(TYPICAL)LIGHT POLETO BE REMOVED(TYPICAL)
CURBTO BE REMOVED(TYPICAL)
INSTALL TREEPROTECTION
INSTALL TREE PROTECTION
INSTALL TREE PROTECTION
0
Feet
Graphic Scale
30 30 60 90 120
15°±VT GridMagneticSheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
No. 9020CIVILABIGAIL A. D
E
R
YSTATE O F VERM
O
N
T
PROF
ESSIONAL
E N G INEERLICEN S E D
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
Demolition & EPSC
Plan
C5-01
11/04/2020
1" = 30'
19-099
RMP
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont2012100
WETLAND NOTE:
THE WETLAND DELINEATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WAS PERFORMED ON 08/26/2020, ACCORDING TO
STANDARDS OF THE 1987 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE 2012 REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT. THISDELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY BRITTANY LEBEAU OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
PLANTS TO BE REMOVED:
2
89
PROJECT LOCATION
BARRIER TAPE
SILT FENCE
EPSC LEGEND
Sheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
For Permitting Only
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
No. 9020CIVILABIGAIL A. D
E
RYSTATE O F VERM
O
N
T
PROFESSIONAL
E N G INEERLICEN S E D
Field Book:
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
Site & Erosion Details
C8-01
11/04/2020
SHOWN
19-099
ALD
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont
SD-001
1" = 1'
LAST REVISED 11/21/2019TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
A
C
B
D
RESIDENTIAL
6
12
2-1/2
1-1/2
6
12
2
1
PARKING LOTS
THICKNESS (INCHES)
ROADS PRIVATE
2
COMMERCIAL
6
18
3
2
N/A
12
4
2 1/2
18
6
1 1/2
COMMERCIALRESIDENTIAL
6 6666E
NOTES:
1. SUBBASE, SAND CUSHION AND SUBGRADE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AND COMPACTED TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN INACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARD A-76. WHERE MORE STRINGENTLOCAL ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED RELATIVE TO ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHOULD GOVERN.
2. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY (STANDARD PROCTOR).
3. IF GROUNDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO DISCUSS ADDED MEASURES SUCH ASUNDERDRAIN. SLOPE SUBBASE TO UNDERDRAIN LOW POINTS.
DRIVEWAYS
SECTION
WEARING COURSE (TYPE III) (VAOT 406)
BASE COURSE (TYPE II) (VAOT 406)
CRUSHED GRAVEL (VAOT 704.05A FINE)
GRAVEL BASE (VAOT 704.04) ORCRUSHED GRAVEL (VAOT 704.05ACOARSE)
MIRAFI 500X STABILIZATION FABRICINSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS6" SAND BORROW AND CUSHION TO BEUSED IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS OROVER BEDROCK FOR ROADS ANDSIDEWALKS (VAOT 703.03)
UNDISTURBED SUBGRADEOR COMPACTED FILL
A
B
C
D
E
SD-004
1" = 1'
LAST REVISED 5/24/2018TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TYPICAL CURB DETAIL
SLOPE
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSEE SECTION DETAIL
CONCRETE CURBCLASS B CONCRETE
GRAVEL BASE
CRUSHED GRAVEL
MIRAFI 500X FILTER FABRIC
6"
R1"18"6"TOPSOIL
12"
CRUSHED
GRAVEL7" REVEALSAND BORROW
SD-011LAST REVISED 03/20/2013TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PAVEMENT JOINT DETAIL
30"
1" TYPE III OVERLAY
1-1/2" TYPE III
2.5" TYPE II
6"
18"
EXISTING SURFACE
EXISTING PAVEMENT
MATCH EXISTING HIGHWAY BASE DEPTH
EXISTING BASE
(ASSUME 24" DEPTH)
(ASSUME 5" DEPTH)
COLD PLANESAW CUTFINE-GRADED CRUSHED GRAVEL
DENSE-GRADED CRUSHED STONE
TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SILT FENCE16"20"MIN.MIN.(MIRAFI ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVEDEQUAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED.)
FILTER FABRIC, OR WOVENWIRE FABRIC
WOODEN OR METAL STAKE(MAX. 10' O.C.)
KEY FABRIC INTO GROUND (MIN. 6")
FLOW
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR SILT FENCE
1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRETIES. WIRE FENCE REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED WITHIN 100 FT UPSLOPE OFRECEIVING WATERS.2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIESSPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION. FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE,6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING.3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BEOVERLAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHERFILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, STABILINKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVEDEQUIVALENT.5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVEDWHEN SEDIMENT REACHED HALF OF FABRIC HEIGHT.6"E-102LAST REVISED 2/10/2016
E-016
NTS
LAST REVISED 03/22/2017TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PROJECT DEMARCATION/TREE PROTECTION 4'TO LIMIT THE EXTENT OF DISTURBED SOILS BY CONFINING EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TO
THE APPROPRIATE AREAS. TO DIRECTLY PROTECT WATERS OF THE STATE AND VEGETATED
BUFFERS SURROUNDING THEM FROM NECESSARY DISTURBANCE.
WHERE THE BORDER OF AUTHORIZED DISTURBANCE BORDERS AREAS OF EXISTINGVEGETATION OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF WATERS OF THE STATE.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD'S) SHOULD BE THE FIRST CONSTRUCTION ITEM IMPLEMENTEDON A CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL DISTURBANCE AREAS BORDERING AREAS OF EXISTINGVEGETATION SHOULD BE DEMARCATED WITH A BARRIER APPROPRIATE TO THE LOCATION.
FLAGGING RIBBON/PAINT: FOR USE WHERE PROPOSED DISTURBANCE BORDERSESTABLISHED WOODED AREAS WHERE INADVERTENT DISTURBANCE BY MACHINERY IS NOTPOSSIBLE. MARK TREES ALONG LIMIT OF CLEARING WITH FLAGGING RIBBON OR PAINT
CORRESPONDING TO THE CLEARING LIMITS ON EPSC PLAN. SPACING BETWEEN RIBBON ORPAINT MARKINGS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 50 FEET.
BARRIER TAPE/ROPE: FOR USE WHERE PROPOSED DISTURBANCE BORDERS NON-WOODED,
VEGETATED AREAS MORE THAN 100 FEET FROM THE NEAREST WATER RESOURCE (STREAM,
BROOK, LAKE, POND, WETLAND, ETC.). BARRIER TAPE SHALL BE HIGH VISIBILITY FIBERGLASSTAPE WITH A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 3 INCHES. BARRIER TAPE SHOULD BE ATTACHED TOSTAKES, AT A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 4 FEET FROM THE GROUND.
CONSTRUCTION FENCE/SNOW FENCE/BOULDERS: FOR USE WHERE THE PROPOSEDDISTURBANCE IS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WATER RESOURCE (STREAM, BROOK, LAKE, POND,WETLAND, ETC.), UNLESS AREA IS DENSELY WOODED. FENCE SHOULD BE CONTINUOUS
AND PREVENT ACCESS TO BUFFER AREAS BY MACHINERY. BOULDER SHALL BE SPACED
CLOSELY TO PREVENT MACHINERY ACCESS.
TEMPORARY CHAIN-LINK FENCE: FOR USE WHERE PROPOSED DISTURBANCE IS IN CLOSE
PROXIMITY TO WETLANDS (AS SHOWN ON EPSC PLANS). FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLEDDIRECTLY ON DELINEATION OF WETLAND TO ENSURE THERE IS NO DISTURBANCE TO THEWETLAND. TEMPORARY CHAIN-LINK FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG WITH SILT FENCEAPPROXIMATELY 6-INCHES ON PROJECT SIDE.
PURPOSE
CRITERIA
CONDITION WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES
20' MAX
4'TYPICAL BARRIER TAPE DEMARCATION
TYPICAL SNOW FENCE DEMARCATION
STEEL T-POST OR1 3/4-INCH SQUAREHARDWOOD POST
4-FOOT BRIGHT ORANGEBARRIER/SNOW FENCE
1.5-INCH SQUAREHARDWOOD POST
3-INCH WIDE BRIGHT ORANGEPOLYPROPYLENE ORFIBERGLASS TAPE
20' MAX.
E-004LAST REVISED 6/12/2013TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS1. STONE SIZE - USE 4-8" CRUSHED STONE, OR RECLAIMEDOR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT.2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50' (EXCEPT ON A SINGLERESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30' MINIMUM LENGTHAPPLIES).3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN 8".4. WIDTH - TWELVE (12) FOOT MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESSTHAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OREGRESS OCCURS. TWENTY-FOUR (24) FOOT IF SINGLEENTRANCE TO SITE.5. GEOTEXTILES MUST BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREAPRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE.6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING ORDIVERTED TOWARDS CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALLBE PIPED BENEATH THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING ISIMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPESWILL BE PERMITTED.7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINEDIN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING ORFLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY,ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKEDONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVEDIMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE EPSC PLANS. (i.e. PLACED IN A SOILSTOCKPILE OR AREA WHERE IT CAN BE STABILIZED PEREPSC DETAILS). IF SWEEPING IS THE CHOSEN METHODFOR REMOVAL THE SWEPT MATERIAL MUST BECOLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF AS STATED ABOVE.8. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON ANAREA STABILIZED WITH STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTOAN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE.9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCESHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO PERMITREQUIREMENTS BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS, WEATHERAND FLOW OF TRAFFIC.
PUBLIC ROADWAY
PROFILE
EXCAVATION SITE
PLAN
SEE CONSTRUCTIONSPECIFICATION 4
4-8" CRUSHED STONEAGGREGATE PLACED
ON GEOTEXTILE FABRIC4" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE4" BELOW EXISTING GRADE 50'VARIESR=12'8"EXCAVATION SITE
EXISTING
GRADE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SW-001
1" = 1'
LAST REVISED 03/22/2017TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH
1'
FINISHED ROAD GRADE
D + 8"1'
NOTES ON STORM DRAIN TRENCH:A WET TRENCH SHALL BE DEWATERED PRIOR TOINSTALLING BEDDING
DEPTH OF STORM DRAIN LINES VARY, REFER TOPLANS FOR DEPTH IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS.
D
FOR PAVED SURFACES
VARIES(SEE PAVEMENT SECTION)FOR GRASSED AREAS
REPLACE TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCHOVERFILL TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT.
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED SELECTEDBACKFILL FROM TRENCH EXCAVATION,FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN 3" INDIAMETER. COMPACT BACKFILL IN 6" LIFTS.
STORM DRAIN, (SEE SITE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE& MATERIAL)
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3/4" CRUSHED STONEBEDDING FOR CMP, PVC, OR HDPE PIPE.
UNDISTURBED SOIL
SD-042LAST REVISED 11/22/2013TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TYPICAL GRAVITY WALL WITH 41" BLOCKS
TO BE FINALIZED BY MANUFACTURER
GROUND LEVEL
EXPOSED WALL
GROUND LEVEL
PERFORATED DRAIN WITH SOCK(AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER)
CRUSHED STONE LEVELING PAD
BASE ELEVATION
FREE DRAINING BACKFILL TOEXTEND AT LEAST 12" BEHIND WALL
NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(IF SPECIFIED)
41" MIDDLE BLOCK
41" BOTTOM BLOCK
28" TOP BLOCK
LEVELING PAD
BURY DEPTH
1 5/8"SB
1 5/8"SB
1 5/8"SB
1 5/8"SB
SETBACK = 1.25"(4.0° BATTER ANGLE ONWALL)
WALL
HEIGHT
NOTE:LOAD CONDITION A SHOWN
(NO BACKSLOPE - NO SURCHARGE)
MOVE BLOCKS FORWARD
DURING INSTALLATION
TO ENGAGE SHER KNOBS
(TYPICAL)
SD-010
3/4" = 1'-0"
LAST REVISED 03/27/2013TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
PAVEMENT CUT TRENCH6' MIN. COVER6"D+2'
CL
SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT
BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT
CRUSHEDGRAVEL
GRAVELBASE
SAND CUSHION
COMPACT BACKFILLSAME MATERIAL AS REMOVEDIN 6" LIFTS
SEE SITE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZEAND MATERIALD
MATCH EXISTINGROAD SECTIONUNLESS INDICATEDOTHERWISE
SSSSSD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D WWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
FO
FO
FO
FO
FO
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
OHP
FD
FD
FDFD SSSSSUP
UP
UP
UP(2)UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP
UP
UP
UP CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPCTV
CTV
CTVCTV
CTV
CTV
CTV
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UP(2)
UT
(
2
)
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UD
UDFD
FD
FDUT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT
UPSSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G G
G
S(2)
(2)
(2
)
(2
)
(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)UP(2)(2)(2)(2)UT(2)D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDDD
D
DG
CLASS 2
WETLAND
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER (
S
T
A
T
E
& LOCA
L
)SHUNPIKE RDKIMBALL AVE
N
U
E
45' SETBACK17.5'SETBACK
124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAYEXISTING BUILDING CONCRETE SIDEWALKSTORMWATER SYSTEM
12"HDPE8" CLASS 52
W
A
T
E
R
M
A
I
N
TECHNOLO
G
Y
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
5 GT
2 SR
2 SR
5 IV1 IVM
1 AF
2 AF
9 CS
5 SJS
3 AR
1 LL
3
3
9
DDDDD
D
D
D
2 AF
3 MS
3 SA
9 QP
3 LL
5 AG 4 CS
7 CS
3 AG
2 AG
4 CS
9 CR
50'
WETLAND
BUFFER
3 AG
5 SJS5 IV
339338
3
3
8
338337FD 35135
1350
35
0
3
4
9
34
9
34
93483
4
8
348347347347346346346345345345344
344344344343
343343342
342342342
341
341
341 341341
340
340340
339 339339339
338 338338338
338
337
337
3
3
7
337337
3
3
6 336336335335
334334
334
333TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC
v. 898 p. 210
map slide 510
map slide 541
7.90 Ac.
tax map no. 1713-00124
TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC v. 812 p. 269
map slide 510
5.00 Ac.
TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC
v. 898 p. 210
map slide 510map slide 5413.98 Ac.337D15°±VT GridMagnetic
PLANT SCHEDULE2012100
Sheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
Landscape Plan
L1-01
11/04/2020
1" = 30'
19-099
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont
0
Feet
Graphic Scale
30 30 60 90 120
Sheet Title
Project Title
Use of These Drawings
Scale:
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Approved By:
No. Description Date By
Revisions
478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM
ENGINEERING SURVEY
Field Book:
For Local Permitting Only
1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for
preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or
utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.
They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted
as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority.
2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,
the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,
and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits,
and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines,
including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect,
to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but
not limited to, contract documents, specifications,
owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical
plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits
for construction.
3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and
location of buildings shown, including an area measured a
minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating
final utility connections shown on these plans.
4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user
shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most
current revisions.
5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not
transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and
copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.
Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If
errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to
the attention of TCE immediately.
6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains
the most current revisions.
PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL
Landscape Details
L1-02
11/04/2020
1" = 30'
19-099
AAD
124 Technology
Park Way
South Burlington, Vermont
L-020
SHRUB PLANTING
TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LAST REVISED 02/10/2020
SPACING "D"ROW "A"NUMBER OFPLANTS/SQ. FT.
5' O.C.
4' O.C.
36" O.C.
30" O.C.
24" O.C.
41.52"
31.20"
26.00"
20.76"
51.96"
0.28
0.18
0.04
0.12
0.07
D
A D D
D
A D
1'-0"
MIN
SEE PLANFOR SPACINGSEE SPECS.FOR DEPTHCONTINUOUS PLANTING PIT FILLED WITH PLANTING MIXREFER TO SOIL PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS
SHRUB ROOTBALL
MULCH, AS SPECIFIED
FINISH GRADE
PLANT SPACING
PLANT CENTER
PLANT ROW
ALL EQUAL ORAS SHOWN ONPLANTING PLAN
NOTE:1. QUANTITY OF SHRUBS AND SPACING AS NOTEDIN PLANTING SCHEDULE.2. CONTINUOUS PLANTING PITS FILLED WITHPLANTING MIX PER THE DEPTH AS NOTED IN THESPECIFICATIONS IS REQUIRED.
SUB GRADE
L-021
PERENNIAL PLANTING
LAST REVISED 02/10/2020TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SEE PLANTING LIST FOR PLANT SPACING
2"PLANT SPACING
PLANT CENTER
PLANT ROW
SEE PLANTING PLAN FORSPACING AND QUANTITIES
SET AT ORIGINAL PLANTING DEPTH
FINISH GRADE
MULCH AS SPECIFIED
CONTINUOUS PLANTING PITFILLED WITH PLANTING MIXREFER TO SOIL PREPARATIONSPECIFICATIONS
SUB GRADE
L-022
1" = 1'LAWN SEEDING
LAST REVISED 02/11/20TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LOAMEDAND SEEDED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE6"SEED AS SPECIFIED
PLANTING SOIL MIX,(ROLLED THICKNESS)
FREE DRAINING,SCARIFIEDSUBGRADE
L-023
1" = 1'GROUNDCOVER
LAST REVISED 03/26/2020TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS12" MIN.2" BARKGROUNDCOVER
MULCH
PLANTING SOIL MIX
FREE DRAINING,SCARIFIED SUBGRADE
L-026
1/2" = 1'EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING
TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LAST REVISED 03/26/2020
12"
LENGTH SET BYHEIGHT OFROOTBALL
3
1
2" SHREDDED BARK MULCH, AS SPECIFIED(HOLD MULCH OFF ROOT FLARE)
2"X2"X10' FIR STAKES , STAINED BLACK; 3 PER TREEEQUALLY SPACED AROUND ROOT BALL; ALL POSTS SHALLBE PLUMB AND HAVE SAME HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHGRADE. GUY WIRE SHALL BE NEW PLIABLE ANNEALEDGALVANIZED SOFT STEEL WIRE OF NO. TEN(10) GAUGESIZE. ENCASE WIRE AROUND TRUNK IN TWO-PLY, BLACK,REINFORCED RUBBER GARDEN HOSE
TREE SHALL BE PLANTED WITH TOP OF ROOTBALLBEARING THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADEAS TO PREVIOUS EXISTING GRADE. TREE SHALL BEPLUMB AFTER SETTLEMENT.4'PLANTING SOIL MIX
ROLL BURLAP BACK FROM TOP 1/3 OFROOTBALL BEFORE BACKFILLING. UNTIEROPE FROM TRUNK.
FREE DRAINING SCARIFIED SUBGRADE
L-028
SHRUB PLANTING
LAST REVISED 02/29/2020TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS12" MIN.PLACE SHRUBS PERPENDICULAR TO GRADE
CURB
2" BARK MULCH: PULL MULCH AWAY FROM BASE OF SHRUB,HOLD TOP OF SETTLED MULCH 1" BELOW CURB
PLANTING SOIL MIX THROUGHOUTENTIRE PLANTING AREA
FINISH GRADE
PLACE ROOTBALLON COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
FREE DRAINING SCARIFIEDUNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
1" = 1'
L-029
1" = xx'
LAST REVISED 02/26/2020TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TREE PROTECTION
FOR TREES TO REMAIN WITHIN LIMIT OF LANDSCAPEWORK AREA:
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ARBORIST PRIOR TODEMOLITION TO PERFORM RECOMMENDED TREATMENTS(FERTILIZER, ROOT PRUNE, ETC.) ON SPECIMEN TREES TOREMAIN BEFORE BEGINNING DEMOLITION.
PLAN VIEW
EXISTINGTREE
EXISTINGTREE
6' MIN.
SECTION VIEW
PRUNE PER ISA STANDARDS. REMOVE DEAD &DAMAGED BRANCHES. TIE BRANCHES UP TO AVOIDDAMAGE FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT.
EXISTING TREE (S)LIMIT OF DRIPLINE(VARIES)WOODEN OR METAL POSTS (TYPICAL)
INSTALL FENCING AT EDGE OF DRIPLINE OR AS FARFROM TRUNK AS POSSIBLE. MIN. DISTANCE IS 6' FROMTRUNK. MAY BE PLASTIC SNOW FENCE OR CHAINLINK, MIN. 4' HIGH.
ZONE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT (CUT/FILL)
PRUNE DAMAGED OR EXPOSED ROOTSDAMAGED WITH A SHARP SAW.LIMIT OF FENCING(INDIVIDUAL TREE)
LIMIT OF FENCING (MULTIPLE TREES)
EXISTING GRADE
LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT (REFER TO PLANS)
LIMIT OF FENCE (INDIVIDUAL TREE)
LIMIT OFCANOPY(VARIES)
LIMIT OF FENCING(MULTIPLE TREES)
WOODEN OR METAL POSTS (MAX. 8' SPACING)
2x4 DIM. LUMBER ATTACHED W/METALSTRAPPING (OPT) AT 2 LOCATIONS(MIN.). CLADDING SHALL BE 8' HIGHWITH 6" SPACING OF BOARDS. WRAPBARK W/BURLAP PRIOR TO ARMORING,OR APPROVED ALTERNATIVE METHOD
NO STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OFMATERIALS WITHIN DRIPLINE
L-019
TREE PLANTING
TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS LAST REVISED 03/26/2020
18"18"12"MIN.NOTE: EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE
ALL NURSERY TAGS, ROPE, STRING, ORSURVEYORS TAPE TO PREVENT FUTUREGIRDLING.
SURROUNDING SOIL SHOULD NOT EXCEED80% COMPACTION, DRAINAGE WILL BEREQUIRED IF COMPACTED SOILS ARE PRESENT
PLANTING PIT IS
(3) TIMES
THE DIAMETER OFTHE ROOT BALL
NOTE:1. ALL TREE PLANTING BEDS ARE TO BE CONTINUOUS,COMPLETELY DUG OUT AND BACKFILLED WITH THEPROPER PLANTING BED BACKFILL MATERIAL.
NYLON STRAP
WITH 3/4" GROMMETS
FASTEN WIRE BELOW POINT OF
MAJOR BRANCHING OR TO MAJOROUTSIDE TRUNK.
2 12" HARDWOOD STAKES. ALIGNSTAKES PARALLEL W/ ROAD/ WALKS
OR PARALLEL W/ DIRECTION OFPREVAILING WIND
TEMPORARY WATERING BASIN
BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATIONW/ SHOVEL AND BLEND PLANT MIX
W/ EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDETRANSITION TO UNDISTURBED GRADE
UNDISTURBED GRADE EXCAVATEONLY TO SPECIFIED PLANTINGDEPTH TO ENSURE STABLE BASE
FINISH GRADE
BACKFILL MIX FOR TREE PLANTING BEDS
REMOVE TOP HALF OF WIRE CAGECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP
FROM ROOTBALL
2" HEMLOCK BARK MULCH, KEPT 3" MIN AWAY FROM TRUNK
TOP OF ROOTBALL, ROOT FLARE SHOULDBE EVIDENT. IF ROOT FLARE IS NOT EVIDENT,THEN SCRAPE OFF THE TOP LAYER OF SOILBUILD UP ON TOP OF ROOTBALL FROM NURSERY.
DECIDUOUS TREE
Tree Replacement Schedule
SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
TREE TO BE REMOVEDSIZE in DBH (IN)
TOTAL
DBH2
MAX. TOTAL IN KIND
Replacements Req'd3 IN KIND ReplacementQTY IN KINDReplacements SIZE VALUE ReplacementsReq'd
VALUE OF TREE(S) TO
BE REPLACED4
TOTAL REPLACEMENT
VALUE Req'd5
TREES
Acer rubrum
AR 1 Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset'Red Sunset Red Maple 6 6 2.4 3 No --
AR 2 Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset'Red Sunset Red Maple 8 16 6.4 -2.5" Cal Yes $3,055 $6,110
Acer rubrum Replacement Summary 22 9 3 2.5" Cal Yes -$6,110
Acer x freemanii
AF 1 Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 4 4 1.6 --Yes $819 $819
AF 2 Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 6 12 4.8 5 2.5" Cal No --
AF 2 Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 8 16 6.4 --Yes $3,351 $6,701
AF 2 Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 10 20 8.0 --Yes $5,229 $10,458
Acer x freemanii Replacement Summary 52 21 5 2.5" Cal Yes -$17,979
Quercus palustris
QP 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 4 4 1.6 --Yes $819 $819
QP 2 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 6 12 4.8 5 2.5" Cal No --
QP 1 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 10 10 4.0 4 2.5" Cal No --
Quercus palustris Replacement Summary 26 10 9 2.5" Cal Yes -$819
SHRUBS
CR 7 Cornus racemosa Gray Dogwood --7 7 3 Gal. Cont.No --
CS 2 Cornus sericea 'Isanti'Redosier Dogwood --2 2 3 Gal. Cont.No --
IV 2 Ilex verticillata 'Winter Red'Winter Red Winterberry --2 2 3 Gal. Cont.No --
SJS 4 Spirea japonica 'Shirobana'Shirobana Spirea --4 4 3 Gal. Cont.No --
TOTAL REQ'D LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT VALUE:$24,908
1 IN KIND Replacements refer a tree replacement of the same species will be removed. All IN KIND Replacements will be a minimum of 2.5" CAL. at installation.
2 The TOTAL DBH is calcuated by mulitplying the QTY of trees in each DBH size group by the DBH size (in inches) to get a total/cumulative DBH of each species group.
3 The MAX TOTAL IN KIND Replacements Req'd is calculated dividing the TOTAL DBH by the base caliper install replacement size, 2.5" to get the total number of replacements per species group
4 VALUE Replacements have been cacluated from methodology developed by Purdue University Department of Horticulture and Cooperative Extension Services
as outlined in documents titled Landscape Tree Appraisal by Michael N. Dana and Tree Appraisal and the Value of Trees by Lindsey Purcell and Jeffery Ling
5 TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE is cacluated by multipying the VALUE OF TREE(S) TO BE REPLACED for indivudual trees/sizes by the QTY of specific trees that are proposed to be replaced with a monetary value, rather than an IN KIND replacement
10/5/2020
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TYPE
IN KIND Replacements1 VALUE Replacements Req'd
Tree Replacement Schedule
30 Community Drive
19-099
Prepared by TCE
SYM QTY IN KIND VALUE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INSTALL SIZE CONDITION COMMENTS
COST PER PLANT
(installed)TOTAL
TREES
AR 3 X -Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset'Red Sunset Red Maple 2.5" Cal B&B --
AF 5 X -Acer x freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 2.5" Cal B&B --
AG 13 -X Amelachier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7-8' HT B&B Multistemmed, 3 min.$540.00 $7,020
GT 5 -X Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis 'Halka'Halka Thornless Honeylocust 2.5-3" Cal B&B Branches limbed to 7' HT $890.00 $4,450
LL 4 -X Larix laricina Tamarack 8-10' HT B&B Full $850.00 $3,400
MS 3 -X Malus sutzam 'Sugar Tyme"Sugar Tyme Crabapple 2.5" Cal B&B $690.00 $2,070
QP 9 X -Quercus palustris Pin Oak 2.5" Cal B&B --
SA 3 -X Salix alba 'Tristis'Golden Weeping Willow 3" Cal B&B $700.00 $2,100
SR 4 -X Syringa reticulata 'Snowdance'Japanese Tree Lilac 2.5-3" Cal B&B $850.00 $3,400
SHRUBS
CR 9 7 2 Cornus racemosa Gray Dogwood #3 Cont.Mulitstemmed, 4 canes min.$60.00 $120
CS 24 2 22 Cornus sericea 'Isanti'Redosier Dogwood #3 Cont.Mulitstemmed, 4 canes min.$65.00 $1,430
IV 10 2 8 Ilex verticillata 'Winter Red'Winter Red Winterberry #3 Cont.Female $65.00 $520
IVM 1 -1 Ilex verticillata 'Winter Red'Winter Red Winterberry #3 Cont.Female $65.00 $65
SJS 10 4 6 Spirea japonica 'Shirobana'Shirobana Spirea #3 Cont.$60.00 $360
Site Planting COST:$24,935
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENT VALUE $24,908
REPLACEMENT TYPE
Opinion of Landscape Costs
30 Community Drive
19-099
Prepared by TCE
10/12/2020
View #3 124 Technology Park Way - Parking Lot Extension
Designer
Date
10/19/2020
Scale
Not to Scale
Drawing No.
Summary
1 of 1
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
Parking Lot
Extension 1.8 fc 3.3 fc 0.3 fc 11.0:1 6.0:1
Schedule
Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number NumberLamps Filename LumenMultiplier LLF Wattage Polar Plot LumensperLamp Manufacturer Notes
N4
6 EMM-E03-LED-
E1-T4
63 EMM-E03-LED-E1-T4.ies 1 0.9 75.2 137 COOPERLIGHTING
SOLUTIONS -INVUE(FORMERLY
EATON)
Schedule
Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number Description Lamp Lumens
per Lamp LLF Wattage
N4 6 EMM-E03-LED-E1-T4 EPIC MODERN MEDIUM DECORATIVE LED
LUMINAIRE (3) LIGHTBARS WITH AccuLEDOPTICS - TYPE 4
(63) 4000K CCT, 70 CRI
LEDs
137 0.9 75.2
N3 2 EMM-E03-LED-E1-T3 EPIC MODERN MEDIUM DECORATIVE LED
LUMINAIRE (3) LIGHTBARS WITH AccuLEDOPTICS - TYPE 3
(63) 4000K CCT, 70 CRI
LEDs
140 0.9 75.2
ECM/EMM
EPIC MEDIUM LED
1 - 4 LightBARs
Solid State LED
DECORATIVE AREA LUMINAIRE
Invue
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
Construction
TOP: Cast aluminum top housing
attaches to cast aluminum
mounting arm hub with four
stainless steel fasteners. One-piece
silicone gasket between mounting
hub and top casting seals out
moisture and contaminants.
(See the mounting accessories
section for a full selection of
mounting arms. (Only these
arms are compatible with the
Epic luminaire). MIDSECTION:
Continuous silicone gaskets seal
lens to top casting and shade. The
mid section features cast aluminum
construction and stainless steel
assembly. SHADES: Heavy gauge
precision spun aluminum shades
offer superior surface finish and
consistency in form. DOORFRAME:
Die-cast aluminum 1/8” thick door
and doorframe seal to underside of
shade with a thick wall continuous
silicone gasket. Mounting hub
ships attached to mounting arm.
Optics
Choice of twelve patented, high-
efficiency AccuLED Optic™
technology manufactured from
injection-molded acrylic. Optics are
precisely designed to shape the
optics, maximizing efficiency and
application spacing. AccuLED Optic
technology, creates consistent
distributions with the scalability
to meet customized application
requirements. Offered Standard in
4000K (+/- 275K) CCT and nominal
70 CRI. Optional 3000K CCT and
5000K CC. For the ultimate level
of spill light control, an optional
house-side shield accessory can
be field or factory installed. The
house-side shield is designed to
seamlessly integrate with the SL2,
SL3 or SL4 optics.
Electrical
LED drivers mount to die-cast
aluminum back housing for optimal
heat sinking, operation efficacy,
and prolonged life. Standard
drivers feature electronic universal
voltage (120-277V 50/60Hz), 347V
60Hz or 480V 60Hz operation,
greater than 0.9 power factor, less
that 20% harmonic distortion, and
is suitable for operation in -40°C
to 40°C ambient environments.
All fixtures are shipped standard
with 10kV/10kA common –
and differential – mode surge
protection. LightBARs feature
and IP66 enclosure rating and
maintain greater than 95% lumen
maintenance at 60,000 hours per
IESNA TM-21. Occupancy sensor
and dimming options available.
Finish
Housing is finished in five-stage
super TGIC polyester powder coat
paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness
for superior protection against
fade and wear. LightBAR™ cover
plates are standard white and
may be specified to match finish
of luminaire housing. Standard
colors include black, bronze, grey,
white, dark platinum and graphite
metallic. RAL and custom color
matches available. Consult Outdoor
Architectural Colors brochure for a
complete selection.
Warranty
Five-year warranty.
TD500028EN
2017-03-29 10:21:56
The EPIC Collection delivers custom luminaire flexibility with high
quality, yet availability expectations of standard specification grade
product. The EPIC Collection can be dressed to suit any application.
Recognizing evolving environmental and legislative trends, the EPIC
Collection delivers world class LED optical and performance solutions to
the decorative luminaire marketplace.
DESCRIPTION
SY STEM
S
CERTIFI E DCERTIFICATION DATA
UL/cUL Listed
IP66 LIghtBARs
LM79 / LM80 Compliant
2G Vibration Tested
ISO 9001
ENERGY DATA
Electronic LED Driver
>0.9 Power Factor
<20% Total Harmonic Distortion
120-277V 50/60Hz, 347V/60Hz,
480V/60Hz
-40°C Minimum Temperature
40°C Ambient Temperature Rating
EPA
Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) 0.94
SHIPPING DATA
Approximate Net Weight:
45 lbs. [20 kgs.]
Catalog # Type
Date
Project
Comments
Prepared by
Maximum Width
24-1/16" [611mm]
Maximum
Height
21"[533mm]
See configurations for more detailed information.
Maximum Width
24-1/16" [611mm]
ECM ClassicalEMM Modern
Maximum Height20"
[508mm]
DIMENSIONS