Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-03-80 - Decision - 1242 Shelburne RoadCITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT of PLANNING & ZONING BRIAN & ALICE WAXLER — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL APPLICATION #SD-03-80 FINDINGS of FACT AND DECISION Brian and Alice Waxler, hereafter referred to as the applicants, are requesting final plat plan approval for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) subdividing a 2.9 acre parcel into two (2) lots of 1.3 acres (Lot A) and 1.6 acres (Lot B), 2) a boundary line adjustment with 30 Imperial Drive to add 0.15 acres to Lot B, and 3) developing Lot B with seven (7) residential units in three (3) buildings, 1242 Shelburne Road. The subject property contains 2.9 acres and is located in the Commercial 1 (Cl) and Residential 4 (R4) Districts. The South Burlington Development Review Board (DRB) held a public hearing on January 20, 2004. Brian Waxler and Ron Lyon represented the applicants. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the DRB finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicants are requesting final plat plan approval for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) subdividing a 2.9 acre parcel into two (2) lots of 1.3 acres (Lot A) and 1.6 acres (Lot B), 2) a boundary line adjustment with 30 Imperial Drive to add 0.15 acres to Lot B, and 3) developing Lot B with seven (7) residential units in three (3) buildings, 1242 Shelburne Road. 2. The owners of record are Brian and Alice Waxler. 3. The subject property contains 2.9 acres and is located in the Commercial 1 (C1) and Residential 4 (R4) Districts. 4. The plans consist of five (5) sheets, plus a cover sheet entitled "Tumblebrook Drive Housing Project, Brian Waxler, 1242 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont", prepared by Dubois and King, dated August 15, 2003, last revised on January 15, 2004, and one (1) sheet entitled "Brian Waxler, 1242 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, Vermont, Subdivision Plat", prepared by Dubois and King, dated August 25, 2003. 5. The Development Review Board granted preliminary approval of the project on October 7, 2003. 6. The applicants received site plan and conditional use approval for development of the existing Sherman Williams paint store on the subject property in 1998. The conditional use approval allowed the relocation of the C 1 District boundary 50 ft. easterly on the subject property. The proposed development reflects this boundary relocation. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. R4 Dimensional Requirements R4 Zoning District R uired Proposed Min. Lot Size 6,000 SF/unit (42,000 SF) 76,614 SF Max. Building Coverage 20% 10.2% Max. Overall Coverage 40% 24.5% Min. Front Setback 30 ft. 176 ft. Min. Side Setback 15 ft. 15 ft. Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 112 ft. Max. Buildin Height 40 ft. 28 ft. 4 zoning compliance Section 3.06(H) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations prohibits more than 30% of the front setback area from being used for driveways and parking, and the balance shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. Furthermore, a continuous landscaped strip of 15 ft. in width traversed only by driveways and sidewalks shall be maintained between the front property line and the balance of the lot. Bartlett Brook Watershed Overlay District Pursuant to Section 12.03(C)(2) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the DRB shall not approve any development proposal on lands within the Bartlett Brook Watershed unless it includes a stormwater management system designed to prevent an increase of the peak discharge and velocity of stream flow downstream of the development site. Accordingly, the applicant must provide a site plan and stormwater management system design details that comply with the requirements of Section 12.03(D) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the applicants must submit the stormwater management plans to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion in the Bartlett Brook Watershed computer model. Suggested improvements or modifications resulting from the Heindel and Noyes analysis should be incorporated into the plans prior to final plat approval by the DRB. The applicant has submitted the stormwater plans for the proposed project to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion in the Bartlett Brook Watershed computer model. Heindel and Noyes submitted a report summarizing and approving these stormwater plans. This report is incorporated by reference. 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 15.13(F) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations requires that the PUD meet the standards of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. In addition, the subject property falls within the BBW District and the applicant must submit stormwater plans to Heindel and Noyes for inclusion into the city's Bartlett Brook Watershed computer model. The applicant submitted stormwater management plans with the final plat application. Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the proposed South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project Pursuant to Section 15.13(B)(1), municipal water service must be extended to serve the proposed development. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant must obtain final water allocation approval from the South Burlington Water Department. Jay Nadeau, Superintendent of the South Burlington Water Department has confirmed that the applicant has water allocation for the proposed project. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The City Engineer has review and approved the proposed "Erosion Control Plan and Details" depicted on sheet 2 of the plans entitled "Tumblebrook Drive Housing Project." (c) The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to the project is proposed by a private roadway. As the project conforms with Section 15.12(C)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a private roadway is sufficient. The proposed roadway is 20' wide and 600' feet long, and is an extension of the Sherwin Williams access. In addition to the 20' wide road, the applicant is proposing a 5' wide sidewalk. Circulation is two-way throughout the site and staff believes the circulation plan is adequate. The access point to the site is located in the City's Traffic Overlay District, Zone 2. According to Table 10-1 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the maximum peak hour trip ends per 40,000 square feet in Zone 2 is 20. The maximum allowable VTE's for the 3.06 acre parcel is 66 VTE's, of which 58 VTE's are currently allocated to the existing 12,000 square foot retail store on Lot A. The proposed project will require 3.78 VTE's and therefore fits within the balance of 8 VTE's. Traffic calming measures are not necessary for this project. 3 (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans indicate the proposed project will encroach into the 50' buffer of Class III wetlands throughout the subject property. The applicant has provided an analysis of wetlands impacts prepared by a qualified wetlands consultant. Any wetland encroachments must comply with Section 12.02(E) of the proposed South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Accordingly, any proposed wetland encroachments must be reviewed by the South Burlington Natural Resources Committee. The Natural Resource Committee met on September 8, 2003 to discuss this encroachment. A memorandum, dated September 24, 2003, outlining the Committee's recommendations to the Development Review Board is incorporated by reference. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning districts) in which it is located According to Section 4.03(H) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the purpose of the R4 District is to encourage residential use at moderate densities that are compatible with existing neighborhoods and undeveloped land adjacent to those neighborhoods. The proposed multiunit residential development is proposed in an area located between existing commercial development and single family residential development. As such, the proposed development is compatible with existing development in the vicinity. In addition, the plans show that the minimum required 65 ft. setback from the adjacent R4 District will be provided on Lot A within the C1 District. 09 Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas No streams occur on the subject property. The proposed project layout is designed to avoid development in the Class III wetlands, mainly to the east and west of the proposed buildings. Therefore, these sections of the property will remain as open space. This is a sufficient open space plan to fulfill this requirement. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided Chief Brent reviewed the final plat plans submitted by the applicant. He had two (2) major concerns with the layout of the project. The first concern was that the applicant added parking spaces #20-22. This reduces the space the Fire Department has to maneuver their trucks in the case of an emergency. He requests that these three (3) spaces be removed and that the space remain open and paved. In addition, the Chief has a concern about the relationship of the fire hydrant adjacent to 4 unit #103 and the curb cut. He requests that this curb cut be rounded out so that the hydrant is more accessible. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The plans depict a proposed 10' wide utility easement running to the south of the subject property through Lot C to Imperial Drive. Also, the applicant has provided a 20' wide right-of-way from the proposed private roadway to the property to the north, for possible future use. (i) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards The proposed project is to be served by an extension of the existing Sherwin Williams access drive. The road will remain private and complies with the requirements of Section 15.12(C)(3) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The outdoor lighting plan must comply with Section 13.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The plans show two (2) 15' pole lights with 175-watt MH cutoff fixtures. The applicant submitted exterior lighting details (cut - sheets) with the final plat application, which are in compliance with Section 13.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The plans depict the utility cabinet adequately screened. 0) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The Comprehensive Plan advocates residential infill development in areas that are near services. Mixed -use PUDs, which integrate housing into commercial and retail areas are encouraged. At the same time, existing residential neighborhoods should be protected from significant traffic and noise by adequate setbacks and landscape screening. This project is consistent with these goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, an shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking area The project accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. The applicant has submitted an adequate landscaping plan. At its meeting on June 2, 2003, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the plans for the proposed project and 5 recommended that a sidewalk be constructed connecting the development to Shelburne Road. The plans depict a 5' wide sidewalk along the proposed roadway. This sidewalk should be clearly separated from the access drive with striping. The Development Review Board requires that a sidewalk be constructed along the entire length of the private road to Shelburne Road. The preliminary plat approval required that the plan show a pedestrian easement from the subject property to Imperial Drive. The plan submitted does not show this pedestrian easement. On October 6, 2003, the day before the October 7, 2003 preliminary plat hearing, the applicants entered into a covenant with the neighbors on Imperial Drive and Worth Street. This covenant prohibits the applicant from constructing any "road or other means of accessing the property... between the property and the street currently known as Imperial Drive." Despite this covenant, the Development Review Board requires that the applicant provide a pedestrian access extending from the property to the north, through the subject property, to Imperial Drive. According to Table 13-1 in Section 13.01(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the proposed project requires a minimum of 16 parking spaces. The plans show a total of 22 parking spaces, 14 of which are located in garages and driveways. The additional 8 parking spaces are located along the southerly boundary of Lot B. These additional parking spaces conform to the design requirements outlined in Table 13-8 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. However, the preliminary plans were approved with only 19 parking spaces: 14 located in the garages and driveways of the proposed buildings and 5 along the southerly property boundary of Lot B. The Fire Chief asked the applicant to shift these 5 parking spaces to the west to create more space for fire truck access. The applicant shifted these spaces to the west and then added 3 spaces. These additional parking spaces are not warranted, as the Fire Chief specifically requested the extra space for fire truck access. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle parking facility is depicted on the plans. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. Parking is located at the front of the proposed new residential units. The subject property is essentially landlocked behind the Sherman Williams lot with frontage on Shelburne Road and the new parking will not be visible from Shelburne Road. Also, the rear and sides of the proposed buildings are Class III wetlands that the applicant is using for a stormwater basin and open space. The location of the proposed parking spaces is appropriate. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed buildings is 28', which is under the 40' height maximum for the City. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extentfeasible, be underground Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles The applicant submitted a typical 8.5" x I I" building elevation depiction of the proposed structures. The building proposed in the project will be of similar architectural style. There is a significant amount of landscaping on the site to serve as a buffer between the surrounding buildings. (fl Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures The proposed buildings relate harmoniously to themselves and to the residential structures surrounding the property. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following Tecific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. As noted already, the applicant has provided a 20' wide right-of-way from the proposed private roadway to the property to the north, for possible future use. Therefore, this requirement is being met. Also, a pedestrian easement must be provided connecting the property to the north, through the subject property to Imperial Drive, through Lot C. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and otherfacilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show a dumpster on Lot A of the subject planned unit development. This dumpster is screened with a 6 ft. picket fence. 7 Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. The proposed hedge to the south of the proposed parking area is sufficient to meet this requirement and to serve as a buffer between the site and the adjacent neighbors. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans snow storage areas for the subject property. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, and shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. Based on the proposed project costs, the minimum landscape requirement is $13,300. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan and landscape budget that indicates $14,110 of landscaping is proposed for the site. The City Arborist reviewed and approved the plans on July 23, 2003. DECISION Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board hereby approves final plat application #SD-03-80 of Brian and Alice Waxler, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant, as amended by this decision, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning. 3. The plat plans shall be revised to show the following changes and shall require approval from the Administrative Officer. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to recording: a) The plans shall be revised to incorporate the recommendations of Heindel and Noyes, as outlined in their report dated October 30, 2003. In addition, the applicant's engineer shall certify that the Heindel and Noyes recommendations have been included in the final plans. b) The plans shall be revised to remove parking spaces #20-22. The space that parking spaces #20- 22 consumes shall be paved and remain open for emergency vehicle access. Post-ir Fax Note 7671 Date �/ ages To rim J From Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # c) The plans shall be revised to show the curb -cut adjacent to unit #103 rounded out to make the fire hydrant more accessible. d) The plans shall be revised to show a ten (10) ft. wide pedestrian easement connecting the property to the north of the subject property with Imperial Drive, through the subject project and Lot C. e) The table on sheet 1 of the plans describing zoning requirements shall be revised to remove references to a "draft ordinance". f) The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated January 8, 2004. g) The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department, as outlined in the letters from Chief Brent dated October 6, 2003 and January 15, 2004. h) The plans shall be revised to comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated December 11, 2003, including: 1. Shelburne Road sidewalk at entrance shall be replaced with an 8" thick sidewalk. 2. Footing drains for each building shall be shown on the plans. 3. Trees shall not be planted on top of the sewer and water mains. 4. Benchmarks shall be noted on the plans. 4. The applicant must comply with the requests of the South Burlington Water Department, as outlined in the letter from Jay Nadeau, dated January 8, 2004. 5. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the South Burlington Fire Department, as outlined in the letters from Chief Brent dated October 6, 2003 and January 15, 2004. 6. The applicant shall comply with the requests of the City Engineer, as outlined in his comments dated December 11, 2003. 7. Stormwater drainage plans must demonstrate compliance with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, pursuant to Section 15.13(F) of the Land Development Regulations. 8. The applicant shall obtain wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hoover, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 9. The water and sewer lines serving the proposed development shall remain private. 10. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 11. Exterior lighting shall comply with Section 13.07 of the Land Development Regulations. 9 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 13. The applicant shall record a "Notice of Condition" in the South Burlington land Records, approved by the City Attorney, which states that they will grant an access easement to the property to the north for access through the subject property if and when the Development Review Board requires any development on the property to the north to connect to the subject property. This legal document shall be recorded prior to recording of the final plat plans. 14. Pursuant to Section 15.17 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Title showing the ownership of all property and easements to be dedicated or acquired by the City, and said Certificate of Title shall be approved by the City Attorney. 15. The applicant shall submit written confirmation from the U.S. Postal Service approving the proposed mail delivery system, prior to recording of the final plat plans. 16. The applicant shall post a landscape bond for $13,300, prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. 17. Pursuant to Section 15.08 (D) of the South Burlington South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall submit homeowner's association legal documents prior to the issuance of the first zoning permit. The documents that include language that: a. ensures that the garages will not be converted to living space or used as primary storage areas; b. prohibits clearing or disturbance of land within wetlands or wetland buffers, based on language recommended by the Natural Resources Committee in their memo to the Development Review Board dated September 24, 2003; M c. ensures that the association shall assume all maintenance responsibilities for the stormwater drainage facilities until such time as a future City stormwater utility accepts the stormwater infrastructure. 18. All appropriate legal documents (e.g. irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the pedestrian easement) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records, prior to issuance of the first zoning permit. 19. Any changes to the final plat plans shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 10 20. The final plat plans (sheets 1 of 5 and the survey plat) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning. John Dinklage Chuck Bolton Mark Boucher Roger Farley Michele Kupersmith Larry Kupferman Gay'IeQt6hby Signed on the 3`d day of February, 2004 11