The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0002 0004 San Remo Drive (2)titrt I'll ItIiItI.I /..WJ IN(; IWAlill ('I- \I,.II:',T`IEVF I I n(l i ogs I I It4,I III Ii114-I t: t t.h tic t t ��n ! •!I;}S ��I Lht I' I+tnn I Ir A It I•vIIlultIII I•nt Ac-t 1 I) Tha t. the re it re till I (I tic phys i ca I c ► rc:unts t.artces or c:oncl i 1. i o r I , inc:Iuding i rr egulr►r•i t.y, narrowness," or shr►I Iowness of* lot. size or shape, or exceptional topogrr►hical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such condit.ions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 9=+_caYsq_ (2) That because 'of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; i'sI. f /lei �+1,►/ lNadr ve.✓ .�.. nay ---- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; �C�� e;r- - 7y- a, D 44zel—.69A (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; -��n�o Te✓ wf// sm.% %lip.-.�e SiTyr (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least, modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. DvicepoT_.E?�ct%�li.�[!+t✓ !—%' tCtY*—��+ �. Appoa l - Appellant ��•/!Sd`l G��.�"'�/. vote: Yes No �� Sign Use Reverse side f'or additional findings �tfl'I'll MiltI,IINt; to V t nil i rigs I n rtco•or•dliflot• u 1 t h t l •I1;}{ cal t.hit t 11J: A IrI•vI- Iupmc•nt A ( : I 1 I I That. t.ttc re are till ► chit: phys i ca I c: i r•cums fallen~ or cond i t. i on.." , ir►c:ludigig i r1.(. t)Iitri t.y, Fill rr•owness, or shaI lowness vl' lot sl.ze or shape, or exceptional topogrfthicaI or other physical condi t.ions pecu1 i a r to Lhe particular 1)r•operrty, it Fill that the till 11CCCtisary hrtrdsh i p i s duct to such cond i t, i oils , find not the rctims tances o r c o n d i t. i o n s gene rrt 1 1 y c ref► Led by the provisions of' the zoning regulations in the nei�hborhoad or district in which the property is located; �— A (2) That ecause of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessa to ble a easonab use of"t properAy/; 1%,Rlrte a ) -- (3) That such unnecessary hard ip has o been re Ved by appe11aryt/ C4.1& QW1-. C"t� ill— � (4) Th#.+i the variance/ if authorized, will not alter the esV,ential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate r use deve opment of adjacent property, Q.pi_be detriment to t e/public�+elfare;//^ (5) Viet the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modificatio pos ible of a zoning regulations and of t. h e plan. /Ir /V Appeal .�� Vote: Yes ) No Joe Sign IF Use Reverse side for additional findings ticfl TII ItIi1;1,1NIG i.I". /.WJ1N1; Ittl,\kli tit. Al-M!"TNI-N] F f flit i rigs; III rditn(', ; t 1.h �r•r 1 1 c)rt 4 -I1)X r0 1.11 1, 1 rtntt I n►' A 11r r• i ulrntr n I Au t I) That. Lhe re ar•e till ►ylit! ph}'siet►I U►r'cumstarfc:es; oI- r-ondit.ions;, including ir►•egularit.y, narrowness, or shal lowness of lot seize or shape, or exceptional Lopograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to Lhe particular property, and that. the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of' the zoning regulations in Lhe neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Mbc 1 _ (2). That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reason 1 use of the property; /L'7IG (S 4 POSs161V� �C',�rV x3±a- _ i�yL2cSV�� . (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; _ _— (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan._- Ua Appel lant w LWb` t- Vote: Yes 1 Appea 1 a— 60-6 No Sig tJ Use Reverse side for- additional finding. PLANNER 658-7955 City of South, -Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON; VERMONT.O6_403 June 12, 1989 Mr. William Wilson 6 Brownell Way South Burlington, Vermont 05403 - Re: Zoning application Dear Mr. Wilson: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, June 26, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your zoning appeal. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp C-YV7 e7 r7 0 0 o (24- Oh I Ell -147 ;r ( FjV I I 1 =Gl � ��\/ I City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TEL. (802) 658-7953 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER CHARLES E. HAFTER June 20, 1989 Mr. Fred Blais, Chairman South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Fred: Upon review of the agenda of the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the June 26, 1989 meeting, the City Council wish to express their concern with Item #2, appeal of William and Anne Wilson seeking a variance for a 30' X 30' addition to a non -complying structure located on San Remo Drive. Due to the non -complying nature of this structure and its location in the proposed City Center zone, the City Council would like careful deliberation in considering the granting of the variance. If I can provide any information, please contact my office. Sincerely; Charles Hafter City Manager CH/b cc: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer . City of South Burlington ,Application to Board of Adjustment Date 6-6 \,Applicant Owner, leasee,(agent Address f%cU&N Loi cik_:�;701 Official Use APPLICATION # HEARING DATE FT.LING DATE G/ — G " FEE AMOUNT '-) �� f / 1 Telephone # c !S - 7 S /J Landowner V�/ L� i Aiy/VA ��>�,� Address G 91UJAJFLL W �1i✓rtu�H Loc� ion and description of property Type of application check one ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer.( )request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law'(Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appeal a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question N Y 1^ b S-TA rC7U Reason for appeal The owner or applicant should submit along with this application (8 copi--ei plans, elevations, landscaping diagrams (drawn to scale) traffic data and any other additional information which wi serve as support evidence to the Board. Hearing ater— / g n a t u r e o App 1 a n t ------- -_ --"__ V_Doi,/��n �t�"te _below this line ------------------------ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlingotn Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week Month and Date at to consider the followings Time Appeal of seeking} a (�, From Section of the South Burlington Regulations.-� Request is for permission to SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with South Burlington Zoning Regula- tions and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burling- ton Zoning Board of Adjust- ment will hold a public hearing at the South Burling- ton Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 26, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following: # 1 Appeal of Paul and Carol once from Section 19.00 Non -complying structures on 18 and Secti.00 Dimen- sional requirements of the South Burlington Regula- tions. Request is for per- mission to construct a 13' x 25' addition plus an attatched 16' x 24' ga- rage. Convert existing 16' x 24' garage into living area, on a lot con- taining 18,000 square feet located at 1399 Air- port drive. #2 Appeal of William and Anna Wilson seeking a variance from Section 1.80 Non -complying structure, alterations of the South Burlington Reg- ulations. Request is for permission to construct a 30' x 30' addition to a structure which is non- complying to dimensio- nal requirements, lo- cated 2-4 San Remo Drive. #3 Appeal of David Grovelin and Carol McDowell seeking variance from Section 18.00 Dimensio- nal Requirements of the South Burlington Regula- tions. Request is for per- mission to construct an 8' x 10' porch to within twenty four (24) feet of the required front yard at 16 Wright Court. #4 Appeal of Francis Abair and Mary Reilly seeking a variance form Section 18.00 Dimensional Re- quirements and Section 19.00 Non -complying structures of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 24' x 301 second floor, plus a two story 20' x 20' rear ad- dition, converting a sin- gle family unit into a two family dwelling on a lot containing 14,250 square feet with seventy- five (75) feet of front- age, located at 160 Pat- chen Road. #5 Appeal of Charles and Janet Perkins seeking a variance from Section 19.65 Multiple uses and Section 19.00 Noncom- plying structure altera- tions of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to convert two existing structures into three dwelling units on a lot containing approxi- mately 1.6 acres, in con- junction with a retail use, formerly occupied by the Lindenwood Inn, located at 916 Shelburne Road. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer June 10, 1989. viceaaw..�