Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BATCH - Supplemental - 1185 1195 Shelburne Road
------------------------------ Planning and Zoning Information Area: 40.56 acres (P.U.D.) Zoned: Commercial l- Residential 15 Commercial I - Automobile Project Description: Re -approval of Construct—Jenanl changes. ❑ Lot Coverage:111F s++,•v srr.rew.—if ❑ ❑ Esiating Proposed LBM P.U.D. Total Area: 40.56 acres,xw...ren i—, ❑ T�Ilot coverage 563,607 of 31'9% 563.396 of 31'9% Parcel Total Area: 110,835 J. "-' Buildings 21,654 of 15.7% 21.654 sl 15.7% - Cross hatch on this (south face of building) Total lot coverage 86,039 at 77.6% 85,858 sf 77.5% indicates areas that were changed from 1 Landscaping to concrete. Total 42 ef. From yard (Shelburne and Fayette Roads): ( Pagonal hatch on this (south face ofbuilding) Lot D Total Area: 19,595 s.f. 14,373 s.l. 73.4% unchanged indicates areas that were changed it — Concrete to Landscaping. Total 38 s 1. �� Dogma hatch on segment of sidewalk indicates erects that were changed from Concrete to Landscaping. Total 71 sit. Reelirgned , emerge, Diagmel hatch on this (west face of building) indicates areas Mat were changed from Concrete to Landscaping. Total 53 a.f. Cross hatch on this (west fete of building) — indicetes areas that ware changed from Landscaping to concrete. Total 108 s.f. Enlargement NTS \ \ I \ \ - Sanitary sewer alignment adjusted. i Bike racks relocated to cmrdinete Fayette Road with approved Landscape Plans. - I Realign drive with gar t door. NEW BUILDING I = II I I adjust bike rack location.at.ot Landscaping to mcrefts co t 0 ) O cc CD o I -..) I I Sanitary sewer alignment Relocated STMN2 I changed. Add one SMR I I I I I I I I CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs a Lensing C.—Hing En9insero, Inc 18C hi tint Sidle i Colchester, VT o54Ce L T (802):;S- 5 F Ia0216)e-sale meJ,ykrobsendWskq coon 1uluuuunyq� A ! N0 570J FOR PERMIT RENEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT O. DESCRIPTION DATE „ — YJ CONTENT: — CIVIL SITE PLAN KEY for S.B. Revised Final Plat I Resubmit 7-2018 �' / I t530U/DwGs/1 S:fOg Sne nay v) I P R-1-1 i-201—g DRAWN By: SLM ... — I � I PROJECT NO: KL•=15300 Lights along sidewalk or revised to codinate 7 te!I9 with approved Landscape Rana. DATE. Remove bike rack. Change 160 s.l. REVISED. SCALE 1 = �. of .-crate to LandscePing I Addetl CB Y29 I KEY — - 0 40 80 160' 240' Project Phase PERMIT DOCUMENTS 8or .SC0/6 I*— 4e 1 1 i F 1 NIF Lowe¢ N/F Southland Enterprises, Inc. fl-29,7 f -- I N/F KAPSHA J Prop¢rtie¢, Inc. 1 tt Percei L&M Parcel L&M B N/F Olde Orchard Realty Partnership, LP �' N/F Old,''// or. Re.4 / I 1 I / S W34'47•E 513.77'� _ S 04'4TM1N Jolley ' _ _ — — — — __ _ ._. __ — TT85-0715'VP 48.09' 5 180.75' 1 1 ` L=08.00' N/F JohRE JV Mixed R=270.00' ry g �rk'n' in no N/F Gni Fifteen NE Branch Hddings N/F Farrell t I' ego i sea 091eE c N/F Sptiana >z I i \ sy Parcel C N/F Larkin Milo' Fasting City of South Burlington utility easement , \ a Partnerehip n NIF Northfield t =270. 00' L=202.941' Savings Bank R I — R=15.00' L=9.B1' I N 55°19'03'W 80' wide right-of-way subject to itrewcabie otter of dedication I ' 230.96' N40'19'48'^N 37.24' Percel E \ 228.13' +1 , N/F L&M Partrrersbi 1 , ' 1 I I S41'2423'W 23.SV ROW Iy� i N/F 1 I N Percei D Paendview u, N/F Larkin 9 Farms, Inc. 1107 92at Iw 2.54 acre¢ — — — — 497,331' � V. —�� N/F Wilson585°12'O9"E 9B8°135E'E 455.40' 955'1355'E 5.71Y 11¢¢ sh.lbem. Ra. N/f Si¢ters and 1 ¢s sa•aam• Ra N/F John Larkin, Inc y l B _Gr p, LL mem `o, m. N/F John Larkin, Inc. �' _ (Parcel A) I Group, LLC (Parcel B) ( 2.56 acres 111 ` 4A9 saes I 0 I N/F Magri Hddings. 711,28 7,,.2e N g I LTD 54"VJ N08'22'S4'w N81'0559Ny N/F Ferrell Distributing Corporation Bo.i 3'264AW ' N/F 1233 Shelburne Road Association Zone line from City of South Burlington Official mapping 11 ,1 i 0' 100' 200' 400' 600' Bar Scale 1, 100, 1 , LOCUS Approved by resolution of the Development Review Board, The City of South Burlington, Vermont on _ day of , , subject to the requirements of said conditions of said resolution. Signed this day of , by Chairman of Clerk City Clerk's Office Received 20_ at Recorded in Slide on page of So. Burlington Land Records attest: City Clerk CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs &Lensing Ctiry n Engieers, Inc 44 Stre, 1Main Street, Su4e 201 Colc(W2) . 8 05 5 L e F (W2) 878-H 18 F: 1802) s]s-sat8 mail@krebsantllansing com ,aFNvf NO 5703 *S ,/TjIr11111111Ns" \` FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE w+y+e a o<�m annr + • umn Q+u,r e nee ,.. lovx. ,wn v co�.+na�„a• m Nven+ a e. „mrs se nn-1-1 vrene CONTENT: OVERALL EXISTING SITE and P.U.D. PLAN DRAWN BY: SLM PROJECT NO: KL=15300 DATE oB/29/16 REVISED: SCALE I- 100' SP-1 Project Phase PERMIT DOCUMENTS / / � � 4\ i �@` � ! I � 7 • She Bitl for for SA Contractorilcope Qn gas Ijne / I \ I \ i \ .mom \ •--p° — --F -- �I� °"- . �... O I _ 41S Hi ' — � _ r� — — —a— — .�-�— I _\ ....._.__..—.__• __ �eaap.ez e_—- c" or � ' �/ ` �� -,.s _ - _ % y - - -•- + �- t Fayette Road New 12kB" en Tapping sleev� a"v�l.s If —� \ Remove existing CB I \� � _ - II iti -�I FI �•� - - ' Underground'tiltiel — 1 1, Remove ax rd ng concrete stairs. Sea tanda e drawings �� \ I I -I _ . \ — l New hydrant Is ■ ■'I' . I ■ .YO I��?I� ■ V■filf€IMI ■ .. ;I■iHER r■W■r■6%.....,. If ■ CS 15 8820 �I �71, a ■ _ �� �._ 11at ■ , ■■ .i•I,l I/ ■ !CI errr� , i ■113 ■ \ _'i�1lll IN I M mill I � ���JL�r��wai3Mr�u.�tl��a01®�Plq����•�.__�..-�.���s:�li's�l-:���I�r��.=,rw-.=��'.-"-f�.ill�l��'(u � " — - - ■Sri■e���e1�6�_►-!�1�,�I..Ira:�:�i:���esr�■■���s�:��r��l�re�oa�r,��■■■■■��■��w�I�■I■■►.�i ■ 1 ■ 1 �r ■ i i i P� I i CIVIL ENGINEER I Arabs a I-anang Ca NEng Engi—, in.. �M,Wzca89618°t me Qkrebsantllansing.wm r \"q\\11�e1111/I/n, / I y1� ooc'n3 _Y• � NO 5703 Yr= ,sT ?r I d: Intill CFOR PERMIT REVIEW I m LARKIN NewbL shelter nd con eta slab. Landsc dra nge. TERRACE jRoute 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT -1 - 10' 6 FEase laid for I lie ban of l Grale Mount n Power Comm Y dew bed In luma Pag 378 and 1 "her a r betl I 'vow No. DESCRIPTION DATE j 333, age 38 To be r vad. of I sa ev n„„emn, ,'norm aa.ei.n „roans { I sell tlamn .low •re. vmm { II ae a„enn.ee,mPmm�w�n vnn> ejrPsuemn a,av � I nee..e m.,,d annl nrn .avn aa, nnm s'.a��m1 1k..1 .ne„e -1 I •'I'- CONTENT: CIVIL SITE PLAN J11' I _ I Ijelll I I II I ti DRAWN BY: SLM I PROJECT NO: YL-153w t I / DATE 9/29/1e I (I y n REVISED: SCALE 1" - 2n' I I I SP-3 I � Y/ Pmp , Phase PERMIT DOCUMENTS WAGNERHODGSON I A I A P x 4 - LARKI N TERRACE LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN REVISIONS SB FP RESUBMIT 07.18.18 DRAWING NO. JOB NO. 638 SCALE1.. = 2d_0„ L I.0 DATE 05.26.17 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. TYP. � 1 --_ ©_ (1)UA • (14) PA 6 C b 13)TM -.-j \ x a: a • (5)MS (23)HH ` TS)SH (12)SM (T1)HH (IT)SH (22)SH (A HH (5) TO (55) PA or 1 n • V (1) UA • C� F----------------- J I I I I HL RA qTO e� ' (6) GS (12) RA 148) HH (5) RA 1 14) CS 9 L T4)RA I I I I I. 1 I I I I I II I I I I (21) PO 20) PF (6) TM (291) DC P.M. TREES and SHRRIS WITHIN PROPERTY UNE Acr, Rersonu'CelaMation' - CELEBRATION MAPLE 3'-3.5" Cal. 6 EA $850.00 1 S5.100.00 GledWn rucanthoa Shademasr! - HONEY LOCUST 4.5'-S' Cal. IS 1 EA f1,B00.00 f27.000.00 l/Hrs Mwkana Vnincamn' - PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 4.3.5' Cal 11 EA f 1.600.00 $17.600.00 Mm t yahr Simmeed eathm Property Line fN,iMM Searmwwar Ponat PA." &4pw (Mar to Sheet LLI le, deeei3 31 S,MLN LANDSCAPE VALUE WITHIN PROPERTY LINE SI04,IfLN ADDITIONAL TREES and "UBS LOCATED In RIGHT OF WAY Acr. a F-.. A-i - FREEKAN MAPLE 3'-3.5' Cal. 1 i 1 EA I f$f0.00 1 $5.100.00 TOTAL LANDSCAPE VALUE (Tree and Shr.ha) f 12;310.00 Srnmry of loselespe 11o3w Refired for $10 Mint red Comuunun Can 3% d $250,000 $7.500 2%If$250.000 fS.000 1 % of $9,500.000 f95.000 TOTAL MINIMUM VALUE REQUIRED is-rS00.OB �✓ v v v v v v v V v V V V V \/ - \/ PLANT SCHEDULE KEY IQTY I SCEN77RCNAME I COMMON NAME SSE fIAOAL \ DECIDUOUS TREES AA 6 Acr a FrmvnO'Amnvon RIEEMAN MAPLE ras" GL AS SHOWN AC 6 Acr a Frmrnn C.1abnOm' 3^-3.5^ CAL 7^-3.f' GL AS SHOWN SN 6 Bruhn 74rso itrn RIVER BRCH 7'-3. S'GL AS SHOWN G$ 6 G4dleh tnransho, Stnaat K STREET KEEPER HONEY LOCUST 1'•1.f' GL AS SHOWN IT I -a Glad- trust.,] , Shadmwaa' SK40EMASTER IgNFT IDCUST 4'.1.5"CAL A$ SHOWN W 1I Ulnwa am.ricana'Mncron' PRPlCETON APERKm ELM 3"J.S'GL AS ShpwN amKUai CS HIII Corpus Erkce , 1-1.0mantese AUEMANS COMPACT DOGWOOD #3 30'Oz. OL 31 I Dlen,91a lonk- BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #3 3' O.c HL 3 Hydrantles p..ic.1- Vale Q.Ick PlW DWARF PANICLE HYDRANGEA #5 5' O.c PR 20 1111 la fnn<osa BUSH CNQUEPOL 03 30" O.0 PO 7B Ph sots u u�ldlw S;We Da+R DWARF NP3EMRK M3 30'O.G RA 121 Rhw Atamau<a 'Grolew' DWARF FRAGRANT Si 03 WO.c RA 36 Rom n RLIGOfA ROSE #3 4' O.c TM Taaw a m . T,untmif YEW IB'•24" 4' O.c TO 39 Thps occidanrlu 14o6m[ru Dwarf ARWRVRAE #5 30"O.C. V In mAPill it E AL 4RA iili 20' O.c ' OC 307 DetchanpW c TUFTED WAR GRASS #2 MS S Mecandsw dnmua'GrriRmw' EIAAW #2 30'0.0 \ SN M w h Tan' DWARF ►MERE OROPSFfD #2 N' O.C. PERENNIALS ` PB4 Ix 14nwxd0, Realms' DAYLLY #I IS•O.c I) PA N Mwdu aeiPllcddia V¢le Sous DWARF RUSSIAN SAGE #1 IS' O.C. PLANTING NOTES I. Al plant era1 in die plain Wedule all be nursery grown in accordance -in ANSI in a ordanca vdth Z.60.1 Standards for measurement of nur,e,y stock. 2 All plants shall M gunrtasd by the Contractor for a period or one year from data of wept or Provisional Acceptance of she conpleted imtalla.on i the Owner. 3. Replacement starting, .11 be repared pna' to firel Acceptance for try plants which are ms,ng no[ to ,gcifiotions love did or are �nheldry a' .-foracc-stic of the ,pecie (due to excessive pnnng diebacl, or other sort). 4. Al plans ne rial, shall be sdeaed and tagged at d. nursery by Landscape ArcH 5. Landscap. Architect', approni is required for any plant n tri,l ,.bstiwuon,. 6. The Contractor , responsible for immedia ly rwsilying ti. Landscape ArcNtecc i(any plant gwrtiry discrepancies exist besvw-m the planting plan and the plans Itat. 7. All shrub, and tree, will be sprayed with the and-dedc,ant "Wilt-Prur (or approved equal) pnor to the fin, wntr (ro later dot November 30). S. The Land snpe Contactor stall have she GercM Constrictor locate all undcaarground wli[ie in areas to be 1,=ped prior to commanorg mr, Adlus[ments to tree lotadoru II be allowed refire chty corenta re cleanly a problem and with prior dte approval by Landscape Archi, 9. All plant bel. drub aril tree location ,hall be ,mk d in the field by Contractor for Lrid,capa Ardrcects ,pp -'al pnor toInrolladan. Io. Adj.-,, to plant bads andl be approved by Landscape Archtest. I I. Grerd Cansnctor is rant-ble for all erosion caved measure doing 12. All dtsnrbed arealed rd se s are m be topscieded cr sodded, as indicated in clan planting Plan. 11. Much Jail con t or &.1,1 ahreddad hardwood nald or approved equal and aanaar C'u respon#b1a for providbg sample, of mold, to Lardsoape Archsa c Mulch plain mawnab as shown on plan and details. 14. It is 01 incest of tivs contract to a d any d.-b- to eaimrg tress car sfrub, on site other clan dwce specifically dmgmted for transplant or morel. 15. Uqudated d,mge con-- tree, damaged by conopen4on shall be $500 per caliper inch. Shrubs stall M $100 each. 16. Caxnctor i, noponible for verifying and ccndmal all plant coup , as supplied by der Landscape Architect with field-nd..-, as -o ,t-.d. Any discrepancies ,hall be reported to Landscape Architect for approval and direction. 17. Tree transplanting shall be performed by a s 19, hydnulc tree spade sized in necessary to P.J.- the wank. 18. Prior to commencement of any conartxsion all eistirg -a to nenan ,half reonve tree protection fence st carter edge of dnpli whenever pcs,61.. 20 0 20 ao SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHI TEC f U;< r a0186a.0c,s 1.0 ... e16r •.. .. LARKIN TERRACE PLANTING PLAN REVISIONS . SB FP RESUBMIT 07.1& 18 DRAWING NO. IOB NO. 639 SCALE I" = 20'-0" L■ 2 • 0 DATE 05.26.17 15 14 13 12 8 7 6 5 T 3 2 1 L11 EU5 EL3 EL14 EL14 EL4 EL16 EL8 EL12 L3 EL6 EL13 EL16 I EL15 EL13 ' EL11 EL10 El6 EL10 EL3 I n o El -- EL10 � r b° a ELi4 -HHR 77 ❑❑❑ EL14 r -:[ C::_ -� ___ C [ _- _ ❑ [ C�_ ❑ ❑ C [ .� I -� �, J rs EL1 ELI - _ t � _ _ • - _ -- _ 1,- :`-~��>;' � � [ ; �>=��. ••:�:.';��` �'``` __ EL6 � o �'' I -__ �---[ rs , - - ... - - ❑ `#F' [ _� [ ' [ [ W C S LQLO F.:OOR _ o 00 .:�,., ��o ❑❑ •t' _-..._ _ - - �,...� ����.�:. - - - --- - � -,� -.-��. .�:.� L�>�Nri� �.-::� - _ _.. t ; C �❑ }�❑C - C C _❑ SN zo ins rREcasrRucnoNGRADE SN 2 EL12 SN-2 EL5 SN 1 S 2 EL9 ELl EL12 SN 2 EL15 SN 2 EL6 d 2 + N a n NORTH ELEVATION T 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 o in, 12 13 14 T EL11 I - I EL3 EL10 EL10 El6 EL.3 ELi3 EL_t EL6 EL10 EL3 EL10 EL14 EL10 El6 I I I I I I I - m IV 246-5 le EL14 Z EL13 EL13 O V - ------------ k, OQL— z - 41/4" LLJ z ° EL15 O 5 Y F «x - _ � 2 t/e• � — — — — N � w m N ❑❑ [ C ] ❑I - [ 1[ [ C[ ❑[ - ❑[ 1❑ C - W x EL6 — ❑ n i -- ..... ---- _..-- — I\"\ L - ---------- 3 , 0' EL1 EL12 EL9 I EL14 ELi5 ❑ AVERAGE PRECONSTRUCnON s 5 GRAM -201M n.?P:,s 7 2 SOUTH ELEVAT ION EXTERIOR SI GN LEGEND EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND A-LOWA3I.E SIGNAR=A 53AI9V OV THE AREA OF THE WA__ TO WH H'I .5ATTACH=J. w 4R >nrr .H.'-Tow. a=rH •i. PROJECT#: Sf4? INDV:7VAL 3J',IW_ 51GNSMAYHAME AN AREA OF 15%OFTHF FORTIOVO TH: 3J_71'6 H. ET. 1504 OF THE 3JSINE55 STOR ==ROM OR 700 SOT, WHICHFV=R :5 LE55. - N3 DESIGNATED 5,GN BAVJ - 7 7Q SHEET NUMBER A201 05/07/2018 FL ;:� Nfi 7YpF OV=STANDARD MOOII.AR FM`_ 3R.LK - RJVv:vG BOND CO.OR'S i0 3E ROSE AND .iHENAV7(1AH 3Y "JSHNn EI.3 "ID:NG TYPE THREE = BFR CFM _v/ 5I7IVG HARD:EPLAVC" AP �iID NG BY JnM'S HARDI- (6' NOMINAL FJ(P051RF)COAW_ MOOTH TxT 1R"OR AppR0VE0 EOIn_LOLOR 70 B. RICH.%PR=550 ;FACTORY PRIM_ 7 AVJ'ST COAT / F.MSH COAT APPLED .N F7E_J EL4 SID:Nfi TYPE=OJR:=_AT PANEL SD:Nfi. PA:M=J. CO-GR T03F. llV=V WHITE EL5 SIJIW TYP==Vc COJRSED:NDIANn:M=STOVE VEER =_6 WINDOWS: FlBERGLASS WIV70w5 W/LOW-F COATED, ARGON =;L. =J IVSJLATED G.AZ:NG. MA%IM11M U-FM'TOR 0= O�fi PER FFFlL:.=`C'Y VERMOVP" HGM PER=ORMAVC= TRACc REQJIREMENfS. CO..LR TO BE 3_ACK. SFE WIV70N SCHE7V. _� W:NDON TYPE AVD S:IE. E_fi :VSJLATED = BERG_nS5 700R W/;NSU_niJ GLAI:NG. MAX:MJM I}FACTOR 0= 037 FOR OPAQUE PORTION OF DOORS AND MAXIMUM J-=ACTOR OF 0.77 =0R G.AZ`Xi. S=E TnBLES C40P' nV7 C402.3 0= THE 2015 V=RMONf COMMERCIAL BUiDIVG EY-'RGY STANDAR75 FOR A7DI710VAL R=OU:REMEV(5. E.5 STOREFROK 7GOR5 AVJ COMPOV.VTS HA 3F A. /M:NUM STOREFROVf SYSTEM WITH NSJLATFD N ° RS AND MAXIMUM ARfiOV FlLLEDG_ASS MAXIMUM ACTOR OF 037 JR OPnOU: PORTIO 0 J00 J-ACiOR OF 0.%7 -OR G AZ NG 5: _ rABlCS L402: AN) C402.3 OF THE 2015 VERMOVT COMMERC:A. BJ_7'NG EwRGY STAVDARJ5 tOR AJ717IOVAl RL-OJIREM-VfS. COLOR TO BC 3lACK. 700R S..H=DU t OR DOOR TYPO AV7 SIZC--. __IO TR;M: PVC fR:M 30ARD5.5`AOOM TX7URE.CO.OR IO BE _:MIN WHffE EL'i 3J._I JP CORNLE FORMED =ROM COMP05;T= TRIM BOAR75 EI. I E%POCi=D 57EEI. FRAMING EL3 CUT LIMESTOV=TRIM BAND 7ECORATNE BRAC<=T B� CONY RA:I.INfiS SNA-_ MATCH STE RAI_IVGS'SE=.'.Y:L DTn:_5 ='6 CANVAS AND=RAMS TYP=AWV:VCi SYST=M EAST ELEVATION 2O11' WEST ELEVATION cn ��$„ _ � � ,. _1_11 11 I EXTERIOR SIGN LEGEND I EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND SV-1 AL_OWAB.F 5.GN AREA 15 BAS.D ON THE AREA O- TW WALL TO W CH T:5 ATTAQEO. SV 7 :NJIVIDJA, BU5 N=,55 SIGNS MAY 11AV_ AN ARFA 0= 3%0' TH' PORTION OF THE BULD.NG WEER: IT IS ATTAQff.D, "i10F 1}E ARFA 0` TK_ 3U5:NF55 STORFFRONT, ()R 00 SOFT, WHQIFVFR IS ,ESS. SV-J J 5.G4ATFJ SIGN 3AND Z O F— a J W c 08 F=, w H X w W V Q CZ W F- Z Y cr fbi o ROJECT #: 1504 SHEET NUMBER P A202 July 25, 2018 Re: #SP-18-40 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) mnnthc If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belairi Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset StreOt South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com o ,. 1ndI IN vim♦ south ° tigton PLANNING & ZONING Pen -nit Number SP- - qd (office use on ) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ElAdministrative El Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, plione and fax #): John Larkin, Inc & 1185 LLC, 410 Shelburne Road, Burlington, VT 864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page fty.1387, p.136 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft Same 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Skip McClellan, Krebs and Lansing 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: skip.mcclellan@krebsandiansing.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1185 Shelburne Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1540-01185-C 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com E 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Administrative approval of tenant/construction revisions to project. List list under separate cover b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Larkin Terrace Commercial/residential c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Unchanged d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Unchanged e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Unchanged f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): Unchanged g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Unchanged h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 l 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 110835 Existing 15.7 % / Proposed 15.7 % / Sq. Ft. 21654 sq. ft. 21654 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 77.6 % / 86039 Proposed 77.6 % / 86023 c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed sq. ft. sq. ft. 73.4 % / 14373 sq. ft. 73.4 % / 14373 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0 * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 0 b. Landscaping: $ 0 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): Unchanged 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Unchanged 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Uncha 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Unchanged 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the ccity's fee schedule. ' Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. t SIGN -URE4 OF APPLICANT WNAT OFPROPERTY OWNER .) PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board inistrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Incomple /dfminissitrat-ive Officer YDae The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 KREBS & LANSING Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street, Suite 201 Colchester, VT 05446 Telephone (802) 878-0375, Fax 878-9618 ernail�krebsandlansing.com July 18, 2018 Mr Ray Belair South Burlington City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT Re: Larkin Terrace Construction Changes File: 15300 Dear Ray, In the course of the construction, discipline coordination and tenant acquisition, we have made several small changes to the approved drawings at Larkin Terrace. Many of the differences in the Civil set are coordinating between Civil and Landscape drawings. Please refer to the list below and the drawings/documents included in our Administrative Site Plan application. Civil • Door locations and sidewalks along south and west building faces have changed. See Architecture and Landscape below. • Added temporary asphalt sidewalk along south parking lot to match approved Landscape Plan. • Bench locations changed to match approved Landscape Plans. • Lights added to Civil plans to match approved Lighting Plan. • Bicycle rack locations are revised. See Landscape Plans. • Private sanitary sewer main/manholes have been relocated. One SMH added. • Added CB23. Architecture Revisions to the material legend: • General: color choices added to legend. • EL2 removed - zinc shingle revised to EL3 - Hardieplank lap siding. • EL9 added — aluminum storefront system. • EL15 Balcony railings revised to match site railings. • EL16 canvas and frame awning system added. General elevation revisions: • Awnings at 4th floor lowered. • All cottage style windows shown revised to be standard single hung. • All storefront at 1st floor revised from fiberglass to aluminum. North elevation revisions: • Mechanical vents removed, actual venting will be based on mechanical design. South elevation revisions: • man door added from bike storage room. • Storefront and door layout revised per tenant layout. Belair 7/18/18 East elevation revisions: • Storefront and door layout revised per tenant layout. • Sliding door added at 4th floor of the tower. West elevation revisions: • Storefront and door layout revised per tenant layout. • Mechanical vents removed, actual venting will be based on mechanical design. Some other things to note: • Bracket design and material has been changed. • 1 st floor Storefront and door configurations will be subject to future tenant layouts. Landscape • Changes to tree species locations. Overall numbers remain the same. • Changed alignment of concrete walks, benches and plant counts from revised door locations. • Reconfigure bike racks. Wagner -Hodgson requirement calculations indicate 10 short term spaces required (1 space/6 res units + 1 space/5,OOOsf commercial = 10 spaces) Please feel free to call/write if you would like to see drawings, have questions or require any additional information. Thank you for your time to review our request. Sincerely, rebs and Lansing Consulting Engineers Skip McClellan Page 2 of 2 Project Name & Address Property Owner Effective Date TOTAL IMPACT FEE Value of New Construction: 1 South Burlington Planning Zoning New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2018 Type of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or SF Reinforced Concrete S66 S88 _ 512-3 ___ 4133 584 17 q76 _ S102 Masonry or Concrete Bearing 469 S96 4113 SF Wood Frame Structure 465 S93 S110 S69 451 481 572 SF Pre -Fab Steel Structure 464 488 S104 467 441 S78 472 SF Industrial/Manufacturing Engineering & Research General Office_ Medical Office _ General Retail_ _ Auto -Service Facility_ Elder Care Facility _ 571 S54 194 S_7_4_ Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Post construction value of structure & land Road Impact Fee PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: NET ROAD IMPACT FEE Police Impact Fee Square Feet of New Structure or Addition Base Fee: $1, 509, 984 $3,774,960 $1, 857,400 $5,030,384.00 40 $3,963.56 $1, 760.63 1 $34,270.201 17976 $4,273.97 x South Burlington Planning Zoning It New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2018 Square feet of existing structure to be removed Creditable amount Existing Single family homes to be removed Existing 2-3 Family structures to be removed Existing 4+ Family Structures to be removed Creditable Amount Current Grand List Value of Site Past Payments credit: Estimated Post -Construction Value Future payments credit: NET POLICE IMPACT FEE 40421 $9,610.50 $0.00 1857400 $1,095.87 $1, 725, 696.00 $189.83 TABLE PD-7 ESTIMATED POST -DEVELOPMENT VALUES PER SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE Type of Use Industrial/Manufa cturmg $76 En ineerm g' g and $100 Office (General) $141 Medical General Office Retail $152 $96 Auto Service NA Elderly Motels Care $117 NA Fireproofed Steel Sketloton or Reinforced Concrete Structure SF 17,976 Masonry or Concrete Bearing Wall Structure $56 $79 $110 $129 $81 $62 $96 $85 SF Wood Frame Structure $53 1 $74 $106 $126 $79 $58 1 $93 $82 SF Pre -Fab Steel Structure $53 $73 $101 $119 $77 $47 $89 $82 IS F 09/15/2017 CitY of South Burlington Grand List Page 1 of 1 01:12 pm Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 1540-01185. LARKIN MARILYN Name LARKIN MARILYN 410 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 Location 911 1185 SHELBURNE RD Tax Map 51-007-000 Desc. 2.09A COMM � Codes: (1) (Category) C (Equipment) (Owner) T Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 1,857,400 1,180,400 677,000 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 1,857,400 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 18,574.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 54024 Updated: 04/06/2017 Last sale was: Invalid on 02/08/2017 for $0 recorded on 1364/139 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 150395000 (8) : N (9): 03/16/01 SPAN: 600-188-13555 ��Od t � l 09/15/2017 CiLy)of South Burlington Grand List Page 1 of 1 01:12 pm Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 1540-01195. FARRELL DAVID M TRUSTEE Name FARRELL DAVID M TRUSTEE 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 Location 911 1195 SHELBURNE RD Tax Map 51-006-000 Desc. 103.23A Codes: (1) (Category)R2 (Equipment) (Owner)T Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103.23 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 4,040,100 3,968,300 71,800 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 4,040,100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 4,040,100 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 162,600.00 0.00 40,401.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 52530 Updated: 09/13/2017 Last sale was: Invalid on 09/22/2014 for $0 recorded on 1244/339 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 105244000 (8) : N (9) : 0 SPAN: 600-188-12065 Grid North (Survey Note 2) W. End of Ease. 1 33 feet Referenced Plats or Plans - /ETHE-ATRE A. "Boundary Adjustment Survey Between Lands oil D. "Plan o/ Sewer Easement - Shelburne Road -No. 2" and D.M.Fanell & S. McConaughyand of Holmes Road "Plan of Sewer Easement - Shelburne Road - No. 3', bothProperties, Inc." last revised 4 / 16 / 2015 by Civil dated February 6, 1969 by "W.J.S", Map Slides 471 andEngineering Associates, Inc. [CEA] recorded Map 97-5, SBLR.Slide 471, South Burlington Land Records [SBLR].E. "Thomas A. Fanell Property - "East O'Lake Inn Parcel"" B. "Boundary Survey -'Allenwood Property' - David M. last revised January 19, 1985 by G.E. Bedard. Map SlideFarrell Trust" last revised December 18, 2008 by CE4. 176.5, SBLR.Not of Record. F.'Plat o/ Survey oI Lakewood Commons", last revisedtry C. "Location Plans of the Rutland Railroad - Vol. 1", August 31,1988 by Trudell Consulting Engineers. Map Slide m d1845-1893. State of Vemam Archives. 215-3, SBLR.CDOS 84'50'00" E 1-7Old Orchard Park 6.53' "Old Orch I 10 Fayette Rd. I E2 Declaration V. 420 P. 246 Map Slide 333.2 Larkin / Milot Partnership, IPF FARM CROSSING E 1 / Vol. 336 Pg. 437 •rrc. T w / f /T -CONSTR. & MAINT. I EASEMENT (HATCHED) I 0 PMWNG TBS 1 A I I� David M. Farrell Trust 1 1 Q Vol. 375 Pg. 615 I41 E3�20' RECREATION EASE. 1 FA 19R' GMP FASFMFNT 1 1 11�1 •'� Y _ Z o� oI I1� 5a, 1 aox CMVERi /' _ SMH IPF ���.1 '—•_. i E5 DRAINAGE�� EASEMENT II PAVEMENT [f1-! 1�<ES�IUkE I I l ZCM111I. DISTRICT II II I EXI: [ 1 I But ] 1 David M. Farrell Trust Vol. 375 Pg. 615 L- 1 '1 � I i I�J FAYETTE - ROAD ' W I E9 —� ( � 1 I `I PMWNO s v 111 �+m u 1` 1 1185 Shelburne Rd. i I a I bo J.P. Larkin 1 1 EB Vol. 1304 Pg. 85 i I ' TBS ' ADJS TING . / _ . _ ' . _ . — — BUILDING E7 // E7 Z —__ _ _ 5_85'14'10" PIPF I c IRF O . f — _ . E 0.3'AG O Q0� 0.2 BG — I 461:18_ �.� T1 / FUTURE I \d/. 600R.o.W.El E_ 30 3 1195 Shelburne Rd. I X sEreACK 5 S 04'42'08" W 1 W I g c /./ David M. Farrell Trust w Lot 1 y 2os.o7' Vol. 375 Pg. 615 Lot 2 I I E" NI 2.559 Ac. zo' clTr 4.111 Ac. I I E 3 SEWER EASE. (IncL proposed street) I ERRD�— m $ EXISTING PAVED Cal O L !'' PROPOSED ROAD TO BE 02rrJl:?tlCr-r_. I I / SUBDIVISION REMOVED 3p_1LE SETBACK 1��4ZI _ \ \ a ° DIS7�lr _ 6'2451 _TBS _ _ S 04'48'36" W fTi I E ' 1 #5 Holmes Rd. f r_ "W 179.42' D.M. Farrell & W DMF - _ 51.16' y o.WAG TBS I S. McConaughy �J 1 Vol 322 Pg. 320 1 Ref. Plat \ I I 1 I I P� m - Easement & Dedication Notes - E.1. EXISTING triangular easement area (to serve Lot 2 only) for E.6. EXISTING easement, 20' wide, for city sewer line crossing the construction, maintenance & repair of roadways, pond & the subject parcel (ca. 1969) (Vol. 91 Pg. 122) landscaping. Easement was conveyed b a 1992 deed from y y E.7. Larkin, Milot 8 Fayette to Farrell &McConaughy (Vol. 334 Pg. 36). PROPOSED easement to be RESERVED b David M. Y The original easement to be extinguished EXCEPT from westerly Farrell Trust for ingress and egress over Lot 2 via a portion of line of future street to easterly line of railroad. SHOWN existing Inn Road and roadway or parking areas to be constructed HATCHED HEREON. across Lot 2, connecting to future street, subject to final alignment of such roadways and perking areas. E.2. Easement for the passage and re -passage of cattle and other farm purposes ("Farm Crossing) as reserved in a deed from E.B. PROPOSED easement to serve David M. Fanell Trust and Black to Penotta, and recorded in Volume 8, Page 414, to the Lot 2 for ingress and egress across lands of Larkin and/or Mitt, extent necessary to preserve any rights David M. Farrell Trust has over the ship of land labeled as an existing IRREVOCABLE OFFER to cross the railroad. of DEDICATION for a future street until such time that the street is E.3. PROPOSED 20-foot-wide Recreation Path Easement to dedicated to the public. serve City, running along the westerly line of Lot 2 contiguous with E.9. The subject property MAY benefit from an existing the easterly line of the railroad right-of-way. IRREVOCABLE OFFER of DEDICATION for a future street leading E.4. EXISTING easement, 25 wide, for power line running southerly from Fayette Drive across Larkin-Milot lands to Lot 2. parallel with the railroad, serving Green Mtn. Power Corp. (Vol. (Vol. 351 Pg. 427) 263 Pg. 349) E.10. PROPOSED IRREVOCABLE OFFER of DEDICATION for a E.5. PROPOSED easement for existing drainage system from future street extension leading southerly across Lot 2 to the pond on Lot 2 across portion of #5 Holmes Road property, Lakewood Commons lands connecting with existing storm drain(s) to south end/or west and discharging over remaining lands of David M. Farrell Trust APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIVED FOR RECORDING IN THE LAND RECORDS OF THE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, AT DAY OF , 20J SUBJECT TO THE O'CLOCK ON THE DAY OF , 20_ REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF - ,20 ATTEST: . CnY CLERK BY CHAIRPERSON E. End of Ease. 1 15.4 feet Survey Notes 1. Purpose of this survey and plat Is to depict a proposed subdivision of a parcel of land of David M. Farrell Trust (Vol. 375 Pg. 615) into 2 Lots as shown. 2. This subdivision is based on our field u s rvey during September, 2014 utilizing an electronic total station. Bearings shown are from Grid North, VT Coordinate System of 1983, derived from our GPS observations on or adjacent the site. 3. Iron pipes found are labeled with inside diameters, and were in good to fair condition unless noted otherwise. Iron rod markers "To Be SeP shall typically consist of fie" diameter steel reinforcing rod with aluminum caps stamped with surveyor identification. 4. Railroad "right of way" is a strip or parcel of land acquired by State of Vermont on Jan. 1, 1964 (Vol. 63 Pg. 501) and is leased to Vermont Railway, Inc. (Vol. 299 Pg. 105). Location is based upon our analysis of 1893 railroad plans (Reference Map 'C"). Held centerlines of track and culverts at Stabcns 105+96 and 170+55.6. Minor changes in right of way alignment are possible should the monument be recovered in future. Alignment shown varies somewhat from some previous neighboring surveys and some neighboring monumentation found. S86'24'51"E N 81'06'09 60.13' PAVE"FM- EXISTING TBS i OUSTING BUILDING BUILDING I T EXISTING , i ` - BUILDING 1233 Shelburne Rd. i "Lakewood Commons" i Declaration V. 217 P. 115 Ref. Map F i E GRAPHIC SCALE1-1 r7 O I r IN FEET 80 It.� � I ul I v 1 i i I Q I � I r O , - Legend - o — — SUBJECTPROPERTYLINE — — OTHER PROPERTY LINE — — — SET -BACK LINE — — — - — EASEMENTUNE To the best of my knowledge and belief EXISTING FENCE this plat depicts the results of a survey conducted by me as described in "Survey OUS77NG STORM Notes" above, based upon our analysis of — s— EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER land records and evidence found in the field. Existing boundaries shown are in E]OS7/NG SEWER MANHOLE substantial conformance with the records, AD EXISTING STORM MANHOLE except as noted. This plat is in substantial O 1p EXISTING CATCH BASIN compliance with 27 VSA 1403, "Recording of Land Plats". This \�1` 10, EVS17NG UTIUTYPOLE statement valid only when accompanied EXISTING GUY WIRE/POLE by my original signature and seal. 0 O IRON RODIPIPE FOUND El CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND TBS 0 IRON ROD MARKER TO BE SET Timothy R. Cowen VT LS 697 C PROJECT LOCATION - Location Map - NOT to SCALE SURVEYORS: lJ r 4 _r CIAL ENGINE-" ASSOCIATES. II IC. 10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 802-864-2323 FAX' 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vLcom COPYRIGHT © 2015 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DRAWN CEA CHECKED TRC APPROVED I DATE ICR'CE'D.1 EFVISION I Subdivision Pla t Allenwood Inn Road Development 1195 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont DATE DRAWING NUMBER MAR. 20, 2016 ORIGINAL SCALE 1"=60' P 1 PROJ. NO. 14233 SHEET I of I ray From: Deb Sherman <DebSherman@larkinrealty.net> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 11:21 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Larkin Terrace - LOC and Notice of Development Conditions Garage and 1st level is reinforced concrete with fireproofed steel skeleton; 1st and 2nd level decks are steel pan and concrete. Levels 2-4 are wood framed. Deborah Sherman Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Rd Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802)864-7444 From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 11:12 AM To: Deb Sherman <DebSherman@larkinrealty.net> Subject: RE: Larkin Terrace - LOC and Notice of Development Conditions M• Regarding the type of construction, please choose one of the following: • Pre-fab steel • Wood frame • Masonry or concrete bearing • Fireproofed steel skeleton or reinforced concrete Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of'documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning it City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Deb Sherman [mailto:DebSherman@larkinrealty.net] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:53 AM To: ray <rav @sburl.com> Subject: RE: Larkin Terrace - LOC and Notice of Development Conditions Hi Ray, See the answers in red. I need to know the following information to calculate the fees; • GFA of the residential portion of the building - 58,703 sf • GFA of the non-residential portion of the building - 17,976 sf • Number of parking spaces in the underground parking area - 53 • Type of construction - IBC Type- VA • GFA of any unfinished space (excluding garage) - 1,762 sf Deborah Sherman Larkin Realty 410 Shelburne Rd Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802)864-7444 From: ray [mailto:rav@sburl.com] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:27 PM To: Deb Sherman <DebSherman@larkinrealty.net> Subject: RE: Larkin Terrace - LOC and Notice of Development Conditions M, I need to know the following information to calculate the fees; • GFA of the residential portion of the building • GFA of the non-residential portion of the building • Number of parking spaces in the underground parking area • Type of construction • GFA of any unfinished space (excluding garage) Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Deb Sherman [mailto:DebSherman@larkinrealty.net] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 9:30 AM To: ray <rav@sburl.com> Subject: Re: Larkin Terrace - LOC and Notice of Development Conditions Hi Ray, Would 1:30 be ok ? Or whatever afternoon time works for you. TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, South Burlington DATE: August 4, 2017 SUBJECT: Revised Traffic Impact Study for Larkin Terrace (#SD-17-12) We are sending you the following items: ® Enclosed ❑ Under Separate Cover Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic 1 8/2/2017 Impact Study These are transmitted: ❑ for approval ❑ for review and comment ❑ for your use ❑ for distribution ® as requested ❑ for other COPY: Gregory Rabideau, Deborah Sherman (electronically) Please let me know if the enclosed does not satisfy Condition 5 of the SD-17-12 REMARKS: decision. Thanks for your help on moving this through. — David Grover SIGNED: RSG 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction.. Vermont 05001 www.rsginc.com Was : Z the science of insight 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, VT 05401 802.383.0118 www.rsginc.com REPORT LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 8.2.2017 PREPARED FOR: LARKIN REALTY SUBMITTED BY: RSG MARK SMITH, PE; DAVID GROVER, PE I a LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PREPARED FOR: LARKIN REALTY 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS.......................................................................................................1 TripGeneration... ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Congestionanalysis........................................................................................................................................................... 1 PUDand Regulatory Restrictions....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................1 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES...............................................................................................4 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes and Adjustments............................................................................. 5 4.2 Other Development Volumes........................................................................................................ 5 4.3 Trip Generation.............................................................................................................................. 6 4.4 Existing Site Traffic........................................................................................................................ 8 4.5 Scenario Volume Graphics............................................................................................................ 8 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................10 5.1 Level -of -Service Definition........................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Level -of -Service Results.............................................................................................................. 11 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................12 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................13 7.1 Crash Histories............................................................................................................................ 13 7.2 Sight Distance Observations....................................................................................................... 15 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT..........................................................................16 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING....................................................................................17 7z 9.1 Vehicle Trips Ends....................................................................................................................... 17 9.2 PUD Parking................................................................................................................................ 18 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................18 10.1 City of South Burlington Road Impact Fees.............................................................................. 19 10.2 ( City of South Burlington Traffic Overlay District........................................................................ 19 10.3 Act 145 Traffic Impact Fees....................................................................................................... 20 BurlingtonRoundabout.................................................................................................................................................... 21 ChamplainParkway......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Fees................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................21 TripGeneration................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Congestionanalysis......................................................................................................................................................... 22 PUDand Regulatory Restrictions..................................................................................................................................... 22 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA APPENDIX F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION DATA FIGURE1: PROJECT SITE PLAN.................................................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS...................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS.............................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD........................................................................................................................................ 9 FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD.............................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD...................................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURE9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD............................................................................................................................................ 10 FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ................................ 11 FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE 95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES)............................................................................... 13 FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY............................................................................................................. 14 ii August 2, 2017 t FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR.............................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE15: CRASHES BY YEAR.................................................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE................................................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD............................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION......................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS...................................................................... 20 FIGURE21: ACT 145 FEES........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Fm 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS The proposed Larkin Terrace development is located in South Burlington, Vermont on the southwest corner of US-7 and Fayette Road. The development will replace an existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel and will create 60 new apartments and 20,250 square feet of commercial space. Because this study must model specific land uses and cannot model general commercial space, we have assumed the 20,250 square feet of commercial space to be a 3,250-square foot restaurant, and 17,000 square feet of retail space. Vehicular traffic will access the site from Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of its intersection with US-7. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION After accounting for internal trip capture and transportation demand management, we project the proposed development will generate an additional 40 PM peak hour trip ends compared to the existing vehicle trip generation at the site driveway and a net of 32 new PM peak hour trips on the surrounding roads network after accounting for pass -by trips. CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the development site and the existing plaza across the street (7 Fayette Road) will maintain Level of Service B. Delays at the intersection of US-7, Fayette Road, and McIntosh Avenue are projected to remain virtually unchanged with the US-7 main line operating at LOS A and the side streets operating at LOS D both with and without the development. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS The project will operate within the parking and trip end limits of the PUD and below the trip threshold of the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This study evaluates the traffic and related infrastructure impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace project on Fayette Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The site currently contains a 61-unit "all suites" hotel. This building will be removed and replaced with a mixed -use building that will contain 60 apartments (50 one -bedroom and 10 two -bedroom), and 20,250 square feet of commercial space. Because this study must model specific land uses and cannot model general commercial space, we have assumed the 20,250 square feet of commercial space to be a 3,250-square foot restaurant, and 17,000 square feet of retail space. As shown on the site plan below, the proposed development will have one access point via an existing curb cut on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of the intersection with US-7. a 1 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 1: PROJECT SITE PLAN Fayette J+ 0.y Cn 3 a rr 0 W a c Cn V This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual,' Trip Generation,z A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and StreetS,3 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),4 Traffic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide,5 and the Vermont I Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2010). 2Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9t11 Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). 3 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Deign of Highways and Streets, 6th Edition (Washington DC: AASHTO, 2011). 4 American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA), ITE, and AASHTO, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 Edition (Washington DC: FHW A, 2009). 5 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Traffic Impact Evaluation Study and Review Guide (October 2008). 2 August 2,2017 State Design Standards,' which are the generally accepted traffic analysis references relied upon by traffic engineering professionals and VTrans for projects of this type in Vermont. VTrans guidelines specify that a traffic study should be considered if the proposed development will generate 75 or more peak hour trips. The geographic scope of the study should include the immediate access points and those intersections or highway segments receiving 75 or more project - generated peak hour trips.' We project that the site driveway will not meet the 75 vehicles per hour trip generation threshold. However, to provide a clearer picture of the traffic impacts of the development, we study capacity and congestion impacts at the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Drive intersection as well as the site driveway. The intersection of US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue is part of a high crash location segment, so we examine crashes at this intersection. We also examine the distribution of project related trips at the site driveway and the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection for permitting purposes. 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC The project site is located on Fayette Road. It is a two-lane, local road 40 feet wide at the site driveway and posted at 25 miles per hour. It connects US-7 (Shelburne Road) to the east with Hannafords Drive to the north. The road is unstriped until lane markings begin at the intersection with US-7 and leading up to Hannafords Drive. Across from the project driveway is a plaza (7 Fayette Road) containing a bank (Citizens Bank), a fast food restaurant (McDonalds), an urgent care facility (Concentra), a sit-down restaurant (Zen Gardens), a gym (Artemis Fitness), and a vacant store front that had been a categorized as a tavern (formerly Tilt). The traffic volumes associated with 7 Fayette Road are discussed below. The project is part of the L&M Park planned unit development (PUD) that includes 7 Fayette Road, a 1,000-seat cinema (Palace 9) and 210 residential units on Olde Orchard Park to the west. The section of US-7 proximate to Fayette Road is a five -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane) with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. In 2015, VTrans recorded an annual average daily traffic volume (AADT) of 31,130 vehicles per day along US-7 at station D577, approximately 0.4 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road intersection. Count data collected by VTrans in June of 2016 indicate the highest traffic volumes along US-7 occur during the weekday PM peak hours. Traffic impacts during this period are examined in this study. Since background traffic in the project area and trip generation is greater during the PM period than in the AM peak period, operational findings for the PM peak hour will be the same or less favorable than findings for the AM peak hour. Figure 2 shows the project location and study area intersections. c State of Vermont Agency of Transportation, I "ermont State Standards (Nlontpelier: VTrans, 1 July 1997). 7 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Trafc Impact EUaluation Study and Retiew Guide (January 2003). 3 C Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS This section of US-7 was the subject of the 2012 report "Shelburne Road Corridor Study" prepared for the City of South Burlington and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and prepared by Parsons Brinkerhoff. This study found that level of service was generally good at the US-7 intersections close to the project site. Our findings are similar to the findings in the 2012 report. 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES This analysis examines design hour vehicle delays and queues at the site driveway and projects trip distribution at the following two intersections: 1. Site Driveway/Fayette Road 2. US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue Vehicle delays and queues are examined first with baseline, No Build scenario, traffic volumes, which represent the anticipated design hour conditions in the target study years without the proposed development in place. Once baseline conditions are established, anticipated traffic associated with the proposed development is added to the No Build scenario volumes to create Build scenario traffic volumes, 4 August 2, 2017 C C which are in turn used to project intersection delays and levels of service with the proposed development in place. A detailed description of the elements that contribute to the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes is presented below. 4.1 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS RSG obtained the most recent VTrans turning movement count data at the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection (counted on June 30, 2016). This count data was used to establish background volumes at the site driveway. Trip Generation was used to establish turning movements at the site driveway and at the 7 Fayette Road driveway across the street. Following VTrans traffic study guidelines, raw peak hour traffic volumes were adjusted to represent the design hour volume (DHV)8 in 2017 and 20229 using two adjustment factors: Design hour adjustment factors are based on VTrans count station D577, which is located along US-7 in South Burlington, VT, just south of the intersection with IDX Drive. The 2015 DHV at this station was compared to the peak hour volumes at the intersection of US- 7/Holmes Road/IDX Drive on the date of the turning movement count to formulate DHV adjustments. This intersection is 0.3 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection and both intersections were counted on the same day. DHV adjustments decreased raw count volumes by 4%. 2. An annual adjustment factor representing general background traffic growth is based on historic count data at VTrans count station D577. From 2010 to 2015, AADT changed from 29,300 to 31,130 vehicles per day, or 1% per year. An adjustment factor of 2% was applied to the DHV adjusted counts to grow the traffic from 2015 to 2017. Traffic volumes on US-7 are expected to grow by 5% from the 2017 base year condition to the 2022 future year condition. 4.2 1 OTHER DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES Other development volumes (ODVs) represent trips generated by anticipated developments in the study area. Trips generated by ODVs are included in every scenario (both No Build and Build) because we assume they are already present on the road network in the analysis years. Through discussion with South Burlington Planning and Zoning staff, the following ODV was identified for inclusion in this study- 0 65 apartments are planned along Green Mountain Drive, approximately 0.6 miles south of the Fayette Road intersection with US-7. Per Trip Generation, this development is expected to generate 40 trips in the PM Peak Hour. Based on the 2016 turning movements at the US- 7/Green Mountain Drive intersection, half of these trips travel through the US-7/Fayette Road Intersection, and 2 trips from this development will pass by the project site driveway. s The DHV is the 30th highest hour of traffic for the year and is used as the design standard in Vermont. VTrans requires analysis during the year project construction is expected to be complete and in a future year scenario 5 years after project completion. 0 15 C Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 4.3 1 TRIP GENERATION Trip generation refers to the number of vehicle trips originating at or destined for a particular development. Trip generation was used to determine the number of trips currently created by the existing Larkin Terrace (61 apartment -style hotel rooms) as well as the rest of the PUD and the traffic generated by the proposed Larkin Terrace development, which will consist of apartment residents, retail store patrons, and restaurant patrons. To estimate the number of new vehicle trips for the Larkin Terrace development, we examined trip generation rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation."? Applying trip generation rates for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 220 (Apartment), LUC 826 (Specialty Retail Center), and LUC 932 (High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant), we calculate the proposed land uses will generate 115 vehicle trips ends during the PM peak hour before accounting for internal capture, transportation demand management, and existing trips (see Figure 3). This development consists of several different types of uses, allowing trips originating from one land use to be destined for another land use within the development. For example, an apartment resident may walk to the onsite retail stores, or a restaurant patron may go home to an apartment. These trips are said to be captured internally and are not counted towards the number of trips generated by the development on the adjacent transportation network. We used the NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed -Use Developments'' to calculate a 42% reduction in trips due to internal capture (48 trips). Internal capture calculations are included in the Appendix. External site generated traffic can be differentiated between primary and pass -by trips. While primary trips represent people who leave their home, place of work, or other origin expressly to visit the site and who would not otherwise have gotten into their vehicle to make a trip, pass -by trips represent vehicles that currently pass by the site on the local road network and who, when the proposed development is present, turn into the site on their way to another destination. Pass -by trips are converted from through movements to turning movements to and from the site at the development access points but do not add new trips to intersections beyond the site access. The percentage of trips that are considered pass -by is based on Trip Generation. Pass -by traffic is typically assumed to come from vehicles passing by the site on an immediately adjacent roadway to which the site directly accesses. However, due to the relatively low volume of through traffic along Fayette Road in the vicinity of the site and the relatively high volume of traffic on US-7, we have assumed the pass -by portion of trip generation will come from US-7 through trips at its intersection with Fayette Road. Due to the nature of the project, the percentage of pass -by trips will vary by land use, and, according to Trip Generation, will be approximately 10% of site generated external trips. Transportation demand management (TDM) is the practice of reducing the number of trips during peak hour travel times by providing alternative travel means (discussed in further detail later in this 10 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). tt Bochner, Brian S., Kevin Hooper, Benjamin Sperry, and Robert Dunphy. Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed -Use Developments (Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research board — National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2011). 6 August 2, 2017 study). Physical TDM measures include being located near a bus stop with a shelter, having access to and providing continuity of sidewalks and transit near building entrances, and providing accommodations for bike storage on site (including both covered and uncovered bicycle parking areas). These TDM accommodations can facilitate up to a 6% reduction in external vehicle trip generation12 (the maximum allowed for only physical TDM measures). The site currently contains a 61-room apartment style hotel which, according to Trip Generation, currently generates 11 and 13 entering and exiting trips respectively during the PM peak hour. These 24 trips are subtracted from the development traffic to determine that the development will add 40 new trips to the surrounding road network, including 8 pass -by trips. Figure 3 presents the projected trip generation, broken out into total trips, internal capture, primary traffic, TDM reduction, and pass -by traffic. FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PM Peak Hour Total Enter Exit Apartments (LUC 220, 60 units) 24 13 37 Specialty Retail Center (LUC 826, 17,000sq ft) 20 26 46 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (LUC 932, 3,250 sq ft) 19 13 32 Total 63 52 115 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 24 24 39 28 115 Primary Pass -By Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 34 25 5 3 67 6%TDMPrimary Trip Reduction* 2 1 0 0 3 Total Development Trips 32 24 5 3 64 Existing trips 11 13 0 0 24 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 21 it 5 3 40 TDM Guidance" VTrans, 2016. (Bus stop with shelter, Transit/walk access site design, Bicycle racks, 6%max) Figure 4 presents a map of the estimated distribution of the net 40 new project -generated trips. Net primary and pass -by trips entering and exiting the site access are distributed onto the roadway network based on background traffic volumes. Twenty-four of the 64 trips are not included here since the site already generates 24 trips. As discussed above, the reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection is due to pass -by traffic and corresponds with an increase in turns onto and off of Fayette Road as vehicles that previously passed by the site divert into the site when the development is complete. 12 Vermont Agency of Transportation. TDM Guidance. 2016. 017 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Stuc; FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS 7 Fayette US-7 0 0 0 5 -2 0 W 0 0 0 2 1 W. 0 � Q 0 -► ♦ 0 0 -► 4- 1 N v o 9 17 6 ,r 0 c LL U 6 0 8 11 -2 0 Site Driveway US-7 4.4 1 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC The existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel generates 24 trips during the PM peak hour. This building would be replaced by the proposed development. Traffic volumes estimated at the site driveway intersection under No Build conditions include these 24 trips as well as trips coming from and going to the plaza across Fayette Road. Due to a vacant unit, the total number of trips associated with the plaza driveway were estimated from Trip Generation assuming full occupancy. Figure 5 shows trips associated with these land uses. Building sizes were taken from the December 23, 2013 parking study by conducted by Lamoureux and Dickinson on behalf of Jim Carroll and the permitting associated with Tilt at 7 Fayette Road. FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 5 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 Formerly Tilt (Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Total 306 4.5 1 SCENARIO VOLUME GRAPHICS Figure 6 through Figure 9 present the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes at the two study area intersections in the build year (2017) and the future year (2022). No Build traffic volumes include the raw count volumes, adjusted to design hour conditions, and projected traffic from a recently permitted development in the area (ODV). Build scenario volumes represent the addition of project -generated traffic (both primary and pass -by trips) to the No Build traffic volumes. 8 August 2, 2017 With the addition of project -generated traffic, volumes entering and exiting the project site increase in the Build scenario and these trips are carried out through the US-7 intersection. The reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection in the Build scenario is due to the increase in pass -by traffic as described in the Trip Generation discussion above. These trips previously passed by Fayette Road in the No Build scenario but turn into and out of the site once the project is in place. FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 Fayette 85 0 57 52 0 65 1 98 41 -� W US-7 1231 4 4- 158 7 -+ 7 127 -� t Ft 0 5 201 1245 Site Driveway FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD US-7 7 Fayette US-7 85 0 57 57 1229 0 65 -0 R- 98 43 -� Cu 113 -+ ♦ 158 7 -+ Cu 13 24 133 `i t P 'i t 14 0 13 212 1243 Site Driveway US-7 22 18 > a ♦- 10 0 ,�- 21 c U 16 22 R- 18 > Q 4- 11 0 ,�- 21 c u e 16 Larkin Realty C Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 Fayette 90 0 0 69 -� Q1 119 -♦ v 4 LL 1% 1 8 0 US-7 60 S4 1292 24 tA c R- 103 43 18 > Q +- 166 7 -► f- 10 N 0 7 134 22 c P M 'S t F 5 212 1307 16 Site Driveway FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD US-7 7 Fayette US-7 90 0 60 59 1290 24 � c 0 69 R- 103 45 18 > Q a, 119 -♦ f- 166 7 ♦ j 4- 11 -C Ul 13 24 140 -�, ,�- 22 LL * cU 1 I% t C 14 0 13 223 1305 16 Site Driveway US-7 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE DEFINITION Level -of -service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. LOS is calculated using the procedures outlined in the 2000 and 2010 Highway Capacity Manuals. 13 In addition to traffic volumes, key inputs include the number of lanes at each intersection, traffic control type (signalized or unsignalized), and the traffic signal timing plans. t3 The HCNI 2010 does not provide methodologies for calculating intersection delays at certain intersection types including signalized intersections with exclusive pedestrian phases and signalized intersections with non NENIA-standard phasing. Because of these limitations, HCXI 2000 methodologies are employed where necessary. 10 August 2, 2017 C C� The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual defines six qualitative grades to describe the level of service at an intersection. Level -of -Service is based on the average control delay per vehicle. Figure 10 shows the various LOS grades and descriptions for signalized and unsignalized intersections. FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED VL_OS •TOTAL A Little or no delay <_ 10.0 5 10.0 B Short delays 10.1-15.0 10.1-20.0 C Average delays 15.1-25.0 20.1-35.0 D Long delays 25.1-35.0 35.1-55.0 E Very long delays 35.1-50.0 55.1-80.0 F Extreme delays > 50.0 > 80.0 The delay thresholds for LOS at signalized and unsignalized intersections differ because of the driver's expectations of the operating efficiency for the respective traffic control conditions. According to HCM procedures, an overall LOS cannot be calculated for two-way stop -controlled intersections because not all movements experience delay. In signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections, all movements experience delay and an overall LOS can be calculated. The VTrans policy on level of service is: • Overall LOS C should be maintained for state -maintained highways and other streets accessing the state's facilities Reduced LOS may be acceptable on a case -by -case basis when considering, at minimum, current and future traffic volumes, delays, volume to capacity ratios, crash rates, and negative impacts as a result of improvement necessary to achieve LOS C. LOS D should be maintained for side roads with volumes exceeding 100 vehicles/hour for a single lane approach (150 vehicles/hour for a two-lane approach) at two-way stop -controlled intersections. Detailed Synchro LOS worksheets are available in the Appendix. 5.2 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS The Highway Capacity Manual congestion reports within Synchro (v9), a traffic analysis software package from Trafficware, routinely relied upon by transportation engineering professionals, were used to assess traffic congestion at the site driveway. During the weekday PM peak hour most approach delays in the study area are projected to remain essentially unchanged with the addition of development volumes. At the site driveway on Fayette Road, LOS is projected to remain at A in both 2017 and 2022. Delays at the project driveway and 7 Fayette are projected to remain at LOS B. Similarly, at the intersection of US-7 and Fayette Road, the mainline (US-7) approaches are projected to remain at LOS A and side line approaches are projected to remain at D. The only exception is the northbound left lane, which is projected to change from LOS B to LOS C. mill Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study Figure 11 presents the LOS results during the weekday PM peak hour. FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS 2017 No Build PM Peak 2017 Build Hour 2022 No Build 2022 Build LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c US-7 / Fayette Rd / Macintosh Ave Overall A 8 0.59 A 8 0.62 A 8 0.66 A 9 0.69 EB, left/thru from Fayette Dr D 46 0.3S D 4S 0.35 D 45 0.35 D 45 0.35 EB, right from Fayette Dr D 46 0.38 D 46 0.41 D 46 0.42 D 46 0.44 WB, along Macintosh Ave D 45 0.23 D 45 0.23 D 45 0.23 D 44 0.23 NB, I eft from US 7 B 14 0.61 B 16 0.65 B 19 0.69 C 22 0.73 NB, thru/right from US 7 A 5 0.48 A 6 0.48 A 6 0.50 A 6 0.50 SB, I eft from US 7 A 3 0.07 A 3 0.07 A 3 0.08 A 3 0.08 SB, thrufrom US 7 A 3 0.43 A 3 0.43 A 3 0.45 A 3 0.45 SB, right from US 7 A 2 0.03 A 2 0.04 A 2 0.03 A 2 0.04 Fayette Rd / 7 Fayette / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 WB, along Fayette Dr A 0 0.01 A <1 0.02 A <1 0.01 A <1 0.02 NB, exiting Site Drive B 12 0.03 B 12 0.05 B 12 0.03 B 12 0.05 SB, exiting 7 Fayette B 12 0.22 1 B 13 0.23 B 13 0.24 B 13 0.25 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the congestion analysis, estimated average 95ffi percentile queues were evaluated using SimTraffic.14 Queues at the Fayette Road/Project driveway intersection are projected to remain virtually unchanged with the addition of project generated traffic (Figure 12). At the US- 7/Fayette/McIntosh intersection, queues do not change by more than on car length in 2017. In 2022, queues in the northbound left and through/right lanes are projected to increase by 2 and 6 car lengths, respectively. The existing lanes are able to accommodate this increased queuing. Detailed SimTraffic queuing worksheets are available in the Appendix. 14 Ten hour-long simulations were averaged together to estimate queue lengths. As each run is different, a difference in a few cars should not be seen as significant. 12 August 2, 2017 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE 9511 PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES) PM Peak Hour 2017 2022 No Build No Build US-7 / Fayette Rd / Macintosh Ave EB, left/thru from Fayette Dr 2 3 3 3 EB, right from Fayette Dr 2 2 3 3 WB, along Maclntosh Ave 3 3 2 3 NB, I eft from US 7 7 8 7 9 NB, thru/rightfrom US 7 7 7 8 13 SB, I eft from US 7 1 1 2 1 SB, thrufrom US 7 8 7 7 7 SB, right from US 7 2 1 2 2 Fayette Rd / 7 Fayette / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr 2 3 2 2 WB, along Fayette Dr 1 1 0 1 NB, exiting Site Drive 1 1 1 2 SB, exiting 7 Fayette 3 2 3 3 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS 7.1 1 CRASH HISTORIES VTrans maintains a statewide database of all reported crashes along all state highways and federal aid road segments.15 Crash histories were collected from the VTrans Public Crash Data Query Tool16 for the 5-year period associated with the most recent VTrans High Crash Location Report17 Qanuary 2010-December 2014). Within this 5-year period, one crash occurred within design stopping sight distance (155 feet at 25 miles per hour) of the site access point. This crash was from a left turn out of the plaza driveway across from the site access. The US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection is part of a designated VTrans High Crash Location (HCL) segment, which means the actual crash rate observed over the past five years is higher than comparable segments across the state with similar functional classification and traffic levels. Since some traffic from this development will proceed through this intersection, we examined crashes on US-7 within the stopping sight distance (250 feet at 35 miles per hour) of the intersection. One injury and one fatality resulted from the 47 crashes at this intersection. This section is ranked 551 out of 647 sections (lower numbers are more severe). As indicated in Figure 13, crashes in this area occur most frequently when there is more traffic on the roads during the later half of the day. Crashes are more prevalent in the second half of the year although there is no clear correlation between crashes and time of year (Figure 14). The five-year trend does not show any significant change in crash rate over the past five years of available data (Figure 15). 1' This data is exempt from Discovery or Admission under 23 U.S.C. 409. 16 http://apps.vtrans.vermont.gov/CrashPubhcQueryTool/ 17 http://vtrans.vennont.gov/sites/aot/files/planning/2010- 2014%20Formal%20High%20C rash%20Location%20Report. pdf 0I13 Larkin Realty ' Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY 8 v 7 t 6 u 5 0 4 v 3 z 0 Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N rl N M 17 un �0 r` W M O 4 N .-1 N rf) dr 6n �0 r- W M O Time of Day FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR 0 8 Ln v 7 L 6 v` 5 0 4 a� E 3 z 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Month FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY YEAR 12 10 s a� t 8 U 0 6 a� E 4 z 2 0 2010 2011 2012 Year Dec 2013 2014 About half the crashes are rear end crashes, which suggests that congestion is the most likely factor associated with crashes at this location (Figure 16). 14 August 2, 2017 FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE 30 to �+ 25 20 15 0 10 5 . z Jer\\e a`a¢ p ear fret\P �e ��a �J, Z• ��a NeNM V 0co �coa a�w �Q. 5a O Q Crash Type The 2012 Parsons Brinkerhoff report on the US-7 corridor mentions high crash locations north of the study area. It also found that many of the crashes in this area are rear end crashes, which are associated with congestion. That report provided a number of recommendations for improving safety including providing alternate routes that parallel US-7 and improving access management along this section of US-7. Traffic from this project will use an existing road at a traffic signal, so it will not exacerbate the access management issue. Overall, the congestion is a corridor -wide issue and it will take a corridor -wide solution. Implementing the recommendations from the 2012 study will help alleviate congestions on US-7 and make this a safer road. 7.2 1 SIGHT DISTANCE OBSERVATIONS As defined in the 2011 publication A Policy on Geometric Design of.Highways and Streets, from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), sight distance is the "the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver."18 Sight distances of sufficient length are necessary at all points along a roadway to ensure vehicles can safely stop or avoid colliding with potential obstructions or other vehicles on the roadway. Standard practice in assessing intersection safety and operations involves measuring two separate sight distances — stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance. In this section, we examine sight distances at the site driveway on Fayette Road. Stopping sight distance is the visible distance along a roadway between an advancing motorist and a potential obstacle in the roadway. It is measured from a point representing the approaching driver's eye and a point representing an obstacle in the roadway. Stopping sight distances of adequate length are needed along all roadways, both at and away from intersections, so that drivers travelling at design speeds can react to potential obstacles and safely brake to avoid collisions. Design minimum 18 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-2. M 11 i 15 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study stopping sight distances are calculated based on factors such as design speed, response times, and grades as reported in the 2011 Poliy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.l Intersection sight distance is the distance available along the major road travelled way corresponding with the maximum visibility between an advancing motorist on the major road and an entering motorist on an intersecting minor road. It is measured between a point representing the advancing driver's eye above the major road and the entering driver's eye above the intersecting road. The 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets states that the available intersection sight distance should be at least equal to the required stopping sight distance along the major road, which in this case equals 155 feet. "Sight distance is also provided at intersections to allow the drivers of stopped vehicles a sufclent view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter the intersecting highway or to cross it. If the available sight distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major road, then drivers have sufficient sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. "20 However, when possible it is desirable to have intersection sight distances that exceed the design minimum stopping sight distances in order to offer improved operations, such that major road traffic need not decelerate to accommodate entering traffic. 1-1 owever, in some cases a major -road vehicle may need to stop or slow to accommodate the maneuver by a minor road vehicle. To enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are desirable along the major road. "?1 Based on the posted speed limit of 25 mph for Fayette Road, the design minimum stopping sight distance and intersection sight distances is 155 feet and the ideal target intersection sight distance is 280 feet. On October 19, 2016, RSG staff observed sight distances at the site driveway and along Fayette Road, and found both stopping and intersection sight distances to exceed these standards to the south. The distance between the site driveway and Fayette Road's intersection with US-7 to the north is less than the intersection sight distance for vehicles turning right out of the site driveway, and vehicles can see clear to the intersection. 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ....... ......... ......... ......_ .-- - .............. ...... ......... Recent VTrans guidance22 defines Transportation Demand Management (I DM) as "a broad set of strategies that strive to either reduce or reallocate automobile travel to achieve benefits such as reduced roadway congestion, improved air quality, reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, 19 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-5. 211 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 21 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Po Ug on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 22 March 2016, Transportation Demand Nanagement (TDTN) Guidance, VTrans Policy & Planning 16 August 2, 2017 reduced parking demand, improved public health for those biking or walking, and reduced commuting and travel costs." This guidance suggests several measures and combinations of measures for TDM that help reduce trip generation from new developments. Specifically, these reductions are applied to the expected trip rates computed from Trip Generation as a percentage. Relevant measures proposed by the Larkin Terrace development fall into the Physical category, and include: - Project location in a mixed use urban area, and on a moderate service transit line (headways of 30 minutes or less) - A bus stop with a shelter within 600 ft. of the project entrance. - Bicycle racks located conveniently on -site - A site design with connections to adjacent sidewalks and transit stop(s) Per the VTrans methodology, each measure has a percent trip reduction associated with it. The aggregate for this development exceeds the maximum allowed of 6%; thus a 6% reduction was applied. 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING The L&M Park PUD limits the number of vehicle trips ends (VTE) associated with the PUD and allows for shared parking between the different uses in the PUD. This section demonstrates that the proposed project will not exceed the restrictions associated with the PUD. 9.1 1 VEHICLE TRIPS ENDS Per the L&M PUD agreement, the number of VTE associated with the PUD is limited to 623 total trips. Figure 17 shows 549 WE will be associated with the proposed development and the other existing land uses in the PUD. This number does not account for internal capture between different land uses, only internal capture within Larkin Terrace Development. The WE would be fewer if internal capture were accounted for. These 549 WE is below the 623 limit. A May 6, 2008 study of the PUD by Clough Harbor & Associates found a significantly higher number of WE associated with the PUD. Since that time, the trip generation rate associated with some of the land uses, LUC 912 (Drive -In Bank) in particular, has decreased, which resulted in an overall lower number of WE associated with the PUD. 0117 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Stua4 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD Larkin Terrace Development Varies, see Figure 3 37 27 64 Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 S 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 Formerly Tilt (Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Olde Orchard Park 230 210 Units 73 36 109 Palace 9 Movie Theater 444 1000 Seats 27 43 70 Total 549 9.2 1 PUD PARKING A 2013 parking study by Lamoureux and Dickenson determined that 490 parking spaces currently exist within the limits of the PUD. The proposed project will remove 44 parking spaces as part of the removal of the existing Larkin Terrace buildings and will install 148 new spaces (55 garage spaces and 93 surface spaces) as part of the new development. This represents a net increase of 104 spaces within the PUD. The PUD-wide parking plan from the 2013 parking study and the projects' site plan showing parking are included in the Appendix. The South Burlington 2016 Land Development Regulations (LDR) prescribe the minimum number of parking spaces a land use is required to have available. In cases where multiples uses are present and those uses will have different peak parking needs, they allow for shared parking. This study examined parking demand at different times of day and different times of year23 to determined that the overall peak parking demand for the PUD will occur 8-10 pm on a weekday between Christmas Day and New Year's Day (see Appendix for a matrix of shared parking demand calculations). It was found that 646 parking spaces will be required at the peak time. After the improvements associated with the Larkin Terrace Development, there will be 594 spaces available. A waiver of up to 25% is available to the PUD, but only an 8% waiver will be required: (646-594)/646 = 8.1%. 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The Larkin Terrace development is potentially subject to two separate Traffic Impact Fees from the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont via Act 145. The project also has trips that enter an intersection within South Burlington's Transportation Overlay District. This section provides sufficient information to calculate relevant fees and demonstrates that the development is in compliance with the current regulations. 23 Flourly and monthly adjustment factors were taken from the Urban Land Institute's Sharked Parking, Second Edition, 2005. Their methodology was used to calculate share parking demands. 18 August 2, 2017 10.1 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ROAD IMPACT FEES This City Impact Fee Ordinance levies a Road Improvement Impact Fee for residential developments that increase the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential developments that increase the number of PM peak hour trips. Figure 18 shows the number of new development units and trips associated with the Larkin Terrace project. The number of dwelling units is the number of new units (60) minus the number of existing units which will be removed (61), indicating a net reduction in the number of dwelling units. The number of non-residential PM peak hour trips includes reductions for internal capture and TDM measures by the following method. First, the total non-residential trip generation is determined by summing the entering and exiting volumes generated from the retail and restaurant uses as show in Figure 3 (78 trips). Next, internal capture reductions (35 trip) are found by multiplying the entering and exiting volumes generated from the retail and restaurant uses by their respective internal capture rates from the NCHRP report 684 worksheets (see Appendix). Subtracting the internal capture reductions from the total trip generation yields 43 trips. Finally, these 43 trips are reduced by 6% to account for TDM measures to yield the 40 non- residential PM peak hour trips. FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION '... Impact Fee: Dwelling Units and Trips Net Single Family Dwelling (Units) 0 Net Multi -Family Dwelling (Units) 0 Non -Residential PM Peak Hour (Trips)* 40 *Includes reductions for internal capture and TDM 10.2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON TRAFFIC OVERLAY DISTRICT South Burlington restricts traffic from developments that used roadways within its Traffic Overlay District. This parcel is in Traffic Overlay Zone 2C (access to a high -volume roadway via a public roadway or a private driveway with a roundabout or a signalized intersection) and therefore has a budget of 0.75 trips per 1,000 square feet (ks024. The PUD generates a total of 549 trips (Figure 17). The project encompasses two property areas: the PUD (1,460 ksf) and 1195 Shelburne Road (95 ks�. As shown in Figure 19, the project is limited to a maximum of 1,166 trips accessing the US-7/Fayette Road intersection. FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY Parcel • •Budget* PUD Land 2C 0.75 1,460 1,095 1195Shelburne Road 2C 0.75 95 71 Total 1,166 *Trips/ksf, based on 30trips per 40,000sf The 1,166-trip budget relates to the total number of trips generated by the site that accesses the high - volume roadway regardless of existing trips. Therefore, existing trips are not considered. However, 24 South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 2016. 10(F), p 179, 30 trips per 40,000 square feet 0 1 19 Larkin Realty C Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study not all of the 549 trips generated by the PUD access US-7, so not all of these should count against the trip budget. Since the number of trips generated by the PUD (549) is significantly less than the total trips allowed to access US-7 (1,166), it is clear that the PUD trip generation is less than the trips budget allowed by this TOD, and it is not necessary to account for PUD trips that do not access US- 7. 10.3 1 ACT 145 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Act 145 requires new developments to pay part of the costs of VTrans funded transportation improvements that their trips will impact. Although there are currently no VTrans funded improvements in the project's immediate vicinity, we understand VTrans' policy is to look at the trip distribution and determine if any trips may travel through a location of planned improvements. The future development is expected to have 64 PM peak hour trips at the project driveway, but only 32 new trips to/from surrounding areas. Note that new pass -by trips (8) and existing trips (24) are not included in this summary as they are not new to the surrounding road network. Figure 20 summarizes the distribution of these 32 new trips to/from areas beyond the project intersection. This distribution is based on the turning movement counts at the project intersections. FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS Discussions with VTrans indicate that two VTrans projects may receive new trips from this development: the Burlington Roundabout to the north on US-7 and the Champlain Parkway to the northwest. To determine trip distribution to these projects, we looked at available PM peak hour turning movement counts between the project site and these two VTrans projects. Where turning movement counts were not available, we examined trip generation of existing land uses. Existing turning movements, a diagram of turning movements at major intersections, the resulting new trip 20 � August 2, 2017 distribution, and trip generation data are included in the Appendix. The sizes of land uses are based on aerial photography measured in Google Earth where the exact size was not available. BURLINGTON ROUNDABOUT We estimate that 3 PM peak hour trips originate from the north on US-7 and zero trips are destined for the north on US-7. Background traffic at major intersections indicates that 1 of these 3 will come from the I-189 offramp, and turning movements at other streets along US-7 indicate that another trip will likely come from one of these side streets. This results in 1 PM peak hour trip traveling through the Burlington Roundabout project. CHAMPLAIN PARKWAY We estimate that 9 PM peak hour trips originate from the northwest and 6 trips are destined for the northwest in the vicinity of Pine Street. These trips connect to Pine Street via Fayette Road, the Krnart shopping center plaza, and Queen City Park Road. Turning movement counts are not available between Fayette Road and the Kmart Plaza, so trip generation for the existing land uses (Palace 9, Olde Orchard Park, Lowe's, and Hannaford) is used to provide a sense of traffic associated with these land uses. Given the large number of trips generated by these land uses (841 in total), it would be conservative to assume that 25% of traffic between Fayette Road and Queen City Park Road is associated with these land uses. After removing these trips from the project's new traffic to/from this area, the remaining trips were distributed according to turning movement counts at Queen City Park Road's intersections with the Kmart plaza and Pine Street. It was found that 4 trips originated on Pine Street and 2 trips were destined for that area. However, the Champlain Parkway will cause the intersection with Pine Street to be disconnected and drivers will be forced to take an alternate route. Based on the possible destinations from Pine Street, we estimate that about one third of these 6 trips will utilize routes that do not include the Champlain Parkway. This results in 4 PM peak hour trip traveling through the Champlain Parkway project. FEES Based on the recommended Act 145 fees associated with each project which VTrans provided, we calculate the total Act 145 fees in Figure 21. The Act 145 fees come to $9,205. FIGURE 21: ACT 145 FEES Projectper . Trips Total Burlington Roundabout $1,217 1 $1,217 Champlain Parkway $1,997 4 $7,988 Total $9,205 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..... ..... . RSG has conducted an analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace development located in South Burlington, Vermont. The proposed development would be 60 apartments, and 20,250 square feet of commercial space (modeled as a 3,250-square foot restaurant IN 121 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study and 17,000 square feet of retail space). The project would replace an existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel. The site entrance and exit will be on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of US-7 and aligned opposite an existing plaza access. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION We project the proposed development will generate approximately 40 net trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Of this total, we project that 8 trips will be pass -by trips (vehicles already passing by the site on US-7) meaning the development with add 32 trips to the surrounding roads network. CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the site and 7 Fayette across the street will maintain LOS B. The LOS at US-7 intersection with Fayette Road and McIntosh Avenue will also remain virtually unchanged with mainline traffic experiencing LOS A and side line traffic experiencing LOS D both before and after the development installed. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS With the additional of project related traffic, the PUD trip generation will be within the trip limits of both the PUD and the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. Parking for the PUD will require an 8% waiver, which is less than the 25% waiver allowed. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the proposed Larkin Terrace development will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. 22 August 2, 2017 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS ^ n �R ZR R ^ ^ GIs m als ^ € € a 's3 otz° immo ���. H§ � � o E E a E o I APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE NCHRP 8-51 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool Project Name: Larking Terrace Organization: RSG Project Location: South Burlington, VT Performed By: DKWG Scenario Description: Build Volumes Date: 15-May Analysis Year: 2017 / 2022 Checked By: MCS Analysis Period: PM Street Peak Hour Date: 15-May Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) Estimated Vehicle -Trips ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 46 20 26 Restaurant 32 19 13 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 37 24 13 Hotel 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 Total 115 63 52 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Veh. Occ. % Transit % Non -Motorized Veh. Occ. % Transit % Non -Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses' Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail 600 Restaurant 600 Cinema/Entertainment Residential 600 600 Hotel Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix' Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 6 0 7 0 Restaurant 0 5 0 2 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 115 63 52 Internal Capture Percentage 42 % 38% 46% External Vehicle -Trips' 67 39 28 External Transit -Trips' 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized Trips' 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A N/A Retail 35% 50% Restaurant 42% 54 % Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A Residential 38% 31 % Hotel N/A N/A Land Use Codes tLUCs) from Trip Generation Informational Report, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator Vehicle -trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P Person -Trips 'Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas Transportation Institute Project Name: 1 Larking Terrace Analysis Period:j PM Street Peak Hour Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle -Trip Ends to Person -Trip Ends Land Use Table 7-P (D). Entering Trips Table 7-P (0) Exiting Trips Veh.Occ. Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips` Veh.Occ. Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips` Office 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Retail 1.00 20 20 1.00 26 26 Restaurant 1.00 19 19 1.00 13 13 Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Residential 1.00 24 24 1.00 13 13 Hotel 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Table 8-P (0): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 1 8 1 7 1 Restaurant 0 5 1 2 1 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 1 5 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 Table 8-P (D): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 2 0 0 1 0 Retail 0 6 0 11 0 Restaurant 0 10 0 4 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 1 1 1 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 1 0 0 Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Destination Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode' Internal External Total Vehicles' Transit' , Non -Motorized - Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 7 13 20 13 0 0 Restaurant 8 11 19 11 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 9 15 24 15 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 9-P (0): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Origin Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode' Internal External Total Vehicles Transit" Non -Motorized Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 13 13 26 13 0 0 Restaurant 7 6 13 6 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 4 9 13 9 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle -trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P Person -Trips Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator `Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number C APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 105/12/2017 * Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T r 4. t1_ tt ?f Traffic Volume (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 Future Volume (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1556 1734 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Fit Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 0.23 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1471 1556 1497 433 3466 346 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 71 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 48 56 0 33 0 201 1261 0 22 1230 43 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 8.3 8.3 79.7 79.7 87.0 87.0 87.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 10.1 10.1 81.0 81.0 88.3 88.3 88.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 147 142 329 2638 332 2880 1310 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.00 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.46 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.23 0.61 0.48 0.07 0.43 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 45.1 45.2 44.6 5.7 4.8 2.7 2.4 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.6 0.3 8.5 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 45.6 45.8 44.9 14.2 5.4 2.7 2.9 1.6 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.8 44.9 6.6 2.8 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 41 +;�. 4� Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds. #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 117 0 0 509 515 115 469 468 207 Stage 1 - - - - - - 245 245 - 221 221 - Stage 2 - - - - - 264 270 - 248 247 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 - 1484 - - 478 466 943 508 496 839 Stage 1 - - - - - 763 707 - 786 724 - Stage 2 - - - - 746 690 - 760 706 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1484 - - 410 439 943 483 467 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 410 439 - 483 467 - Stage 1 - - - - 723 670 - 744 720 - Stage 2 666 686 - 716 669 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12 12.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maor Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 524 1321 - - 1484 - 647 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.049 - - 0.005 0.219 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 7.9 0 - 7.4 0 12.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.8 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 --* --,, t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r +T_ tT1 Y1 tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 Future Volume (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1557 1738 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Fit Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 0.23 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1460 1557 1507 433 3466 346 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 50 63 0 34 0 212 1259 0 22 1229 47 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 8.6 8.6 79.4 79.4 86.7 86.7 86.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 80.7 80.7 88.0 88.0 88.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 152 147 328 2628 331 2870 1305 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.00 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.49 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.41 0.23 0.65 0.48 0.07 0.43 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 44.9 45.1 44.3 6.1 4.9 2.7 2.5 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.3 9.9 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 Delay (s) 45.4 45.8 44.6 16.0 5.5 2.8 2.9 1.7 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.7 44.6 7.0 2.9 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/? Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44. 41f Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Major/Minor Majorl Malor2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 126 0 0 548 554 120 511 511 207 Stage 1 - - - - - - 250 250 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - - - 298 304 - 256 256 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 - 1473 - - 450 443 937 476 469 839 Stage 1 - - - - - 759 704 - 754 700 - Stage 2 - - - - - 715 667 - 753 699 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 - 1473 - - 382 412 937 444 436 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 382 412 - 444 436 - Stage 1 - - - 719 667 - 714 687 Stage 2 - 630 654 - 703 662 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.6 12.1 12.6 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 534 1321 - 1473 - - 618 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.049 0.016 - - 0.23 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.9 0 - 7.5 0 - 12.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0.1 - - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 -"" -* --t 4,- ~ *-- `\ 1 /*� �► 1 d Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations -T r 4-. tT, Tt ?f Traffic Volume (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 Future Volume (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1557 1736 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.84 0.21 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1460 1557 1493 406 3466 319 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 50 64 0 34 0 212 1323 0 24 1292 45 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 8.6 8.6 79.4 79.4 86.7 86.7 86.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 80.7 80.7 88.0 88.0 88.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 152 145 307 2628 309 2870 1305 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.00 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.52 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.42 0.23 0.69 0.50 0.08 0.45 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 44.9 45.2 44.3 6.5 5.0 2.9 2.5 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.3 12.8 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 45.4 45.8 44.6 19.3 5.7 3.0 3.0 1.7 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.7 44.6 7.6 3.0 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/? Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EEL EBT EBR WBL WET WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Configurations 4. +T+ 4+ +T. Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds. #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Malor2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 123 0 0 536 542 121 494 493 218 Stage 1 - - - - - - 259 259 - 232 232 - Stage 2 - - - 277 283 - 262 261 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1477 - - 459 450 936 489 480 827 Stage 1 - - - - 750 697 - 775 716 - Stage 2 - - - 734 681 - 747 696 - Platoon blocked. Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1477 - - 389 422 936 463 450 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 389 422 - 463 450 - Stage 1 - - - - 707 657 731 712 - Stage 2 - - 650 677 701 656 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay. s 2.8 0.2 12.4 12.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NEW EEL EBT EBR WBL WET WEIR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 502 1306 - - 1477 - 629 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.053 - - 0.005 0.238 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.9 0 - 7.4 0 - 12.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T 4 Tll� Vi tt ?f Traffic Volume (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 Future Volume (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1558 1740 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Flt Permitted 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.21 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1450 1558 1504 407 3466 318 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 52 70 0 35 0 223 1321 0 24 1290 49 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 79.0 79.0 86.3 86.3 86.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 80.3 80.3 87.6 87.6 87.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 147 158 152 307 2615 307 2857 1300 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.00 c0.37 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.04 0.02 c0.55 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.44 0.23 0.73 0.50 0.08 0.45 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 44.5 45.0 44.0 7.1 5.2 3.0 2.6 1.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.7 0.3 15.1 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 Delay (s) 45.1 45.7 44.3 22.2 5.9 3.1 3.2 1.8 Level of Service D D D C A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.5 44.3 8.2 3.1 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T. +T, 4+ +T. Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None - - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 132 0 0 575 581 126 536 536 218 Stage 1 - - - - - - 264 264 - 266 266 - Stage 2 - - - - - 311 317 - 270 270 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1466 - - 432 428 930 459 454 827 Stage 1 - - - - - 746 694 - 744 692 - Stage 2 - - - - 704 658 - 740 690 - Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1466 363 396 930 426 420 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 363 396 - 426 420 - Stage 1 - - - - 703 654 702 678 - Stage 2 615 645 688 651 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay. s 2.7 0.6 12.4 13 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1306 - - 1466 601 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.053 - 0.016 0.25 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.9 0 7.5 0 13 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - 0.1 - - 1 Larkin Terrace 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 C APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM No Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB, WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 47 51 53 141 152 120 31 173 137 37 Average Queue (ft) 27 34 33 91 75 51 10 95 61 11 95th Queue (ft) 58 58 68 163 172 145 34 189 154 38 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 0 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 14 28 57 Average Queue (ft) 16 3 8 41 95th Queue (ft) 52 16 28 68 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 56 56 163 162 139 25 155 91 23 Average Queue (ft) 25 34 34 103 84 58 12 99 53 6 95th Queue (ft) 63 59 68 193 177 145 37 174 109 25 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summa LTR LTR LTR LTR 57 18 28 50 20 5 11 40 63 23 33 59 542 201 182 205 Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM No Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 60 65 40 163 201 150 31 164 143 38 Average Queue (ft) 36 38 22 113 96 62 15 102 66 12 95th Queue (ft) 76 74 51 181 200 154 40 174 162 41 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 1 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 6 28 54 Average Queue (ft) 16 1 10 37 95th Queue (ft) 53 11 32 64 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 12 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 80 56 62 178 276 240 31 165 109 33 Average Queue (ft) 43 37 34 129 140 95 12 106 61 15 95th Queue (ft) 87 64 73 236 336 273 37 179 124 41 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 11 1 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 73 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 22 33 68 Average Queue (ft) 20 4 14 44 95th Queue (ft) 54 26 40 81 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 75 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 C APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA _ 4 vaovevn uxe tlC1FS 1. rt0111 nUMBFA of PMNING SPK6 (NICLUaxG PIaNW �ou�co azrvu�n auuanc) - Asa oumu sv,�cfs FaG. ,vtm PROPOSED LARKIN TERRACE PARKING SPACES I � rm 55 GARAGE ° PAKING SPACES D X o -< D c� z o 0 z 8 � 0 mm— c CZ _44 LI■II � � I �I■II T 30 0 I w SCALE OF FEEET WAGNER r DRAFT LARKIN PARKING CHANGES PHASE ONE .1 018.17 L 1.0 Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Size Unit Space Ratio Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 8-10 pm Peak Weekday 8-10 Peak Saturday 8-10 PM Saturday 8-10 PM 1. Palace 9 Cinema 1000 Seats 0.33 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 60% 801A 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 55% 100% SS% 100% 92% 100% Peak It Required Spaces 109 Spaces 264 Spaces 162 Spaces 330 Spaces 304 Spaces 330 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace Studio/1 BR Apartments SO Units 1 SO Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces Hourly as% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1001/ Peak 11 Required Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 56 Spaces 50 Spaces 56 Spaces 50 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace 1+BR Apartments 10 Unit, 2 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces Hourly as% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak p Required Spaces 17 Spaces 17 Spaces 2Q Spaces 20 Spaces 26 Spaces 20 Spaces 2.2 Larkin Terrace Small Restaurant, Short order 3.25 ksf 12 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 9S% 98% 9S% 98% 9S% Peak a Required Spaces 29 Spaces 11 Spaces 38 Spaces 37 Spaces La Spaces 37 Spaces 2.3 Larkin Terrace General Retail 17.097 ksf 5 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces Hourly 95% 95% 80% 40% 65% 50% Monthly 64% (July) 80-A (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) Peak a Required Spaces 52 Spaces 65 Spaces 44 Spaces 28 Spaces 36 Spaces 34 Spaces 3. Zen Garden Restaurant (7,128sf) 7.1 ksf 18 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 129 Spaces 128 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 95% 98% 95% 98% 95% Peak s Required Spaces 94 Spaces 91 Spaces 225 Spaces 122 Spaces 125 Spaces 222 Spaces 4. Artemis Fitness (3,564f) 42 max oc. 0.33 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces Hourly 9096 90% 80% 80% 30-A 301A Monthly 65% 95% 65% 95% 65% 95% Peak q Required Spaces ¢ Spaces 12 Spaces 7 Spaces 11 Spaces II Spaces 4 Spaces S. Formerly Tilt (2,677 sf) 50 seats 0.5 (tavern) 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces Hourly 75% 7S% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% Peak 4 Required Spaces 12 Spaces 12 Spaces as Spaces 2¢ Spaces 11 Spaces 3¢ Spaces 6. Concentra Urgent Care (8,586 sf medical office) 8.6 ksf 5 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces Hourly 80% 80% 15% 15% 0% 0% Monthly 95% 80% 95% 80% 95% 80% Peak 4 Required Spaces j} Spaces 11 Spaces ¢ Spaces S Spaces Q Spaces 0 Spaces 7. McDonald, I., ksf 12 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces Hourly 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% 50% Monthly 100% 95% 100% 95% 100% 95% Peak 4 Required Spaces 12 Spaces 14 Spaces 11 Spaces 26 Spaces 11 Spaces 12 Spaces 8. Citizens Bank 2.6 ksl 5.8 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces Hourly 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak a Required Spaces 1U Spaces 11 Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Total Number of Required Parking Spaces 443 Spaces 603 Spaces 518 Spaces 646 Spaces 621 Spaces 641 Spaces Parking space ratios are based an the Article 13, page 221, of the 2016 South Burlington Land Development Regulation Shared parking adjustment factors are based on Shored Parking, Second Edition , Urban Land Institue, 2005 C C APPENDIX F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION DATA To Points North US 7 0 1673 J I L Price R 881 Chopper t 109 1 189 Off -Ramp Plaza 881 1% t 0 824 US7 1018 1591 J 4 1189 On -Ramp 1189 On -Ramp f r 678 1538 US 7 37 1614 J 256 J To Points North Queen City Pk Rd 8 -� Pine St f 16 236 ZRdJ 2055 J V Queen Ci 22 1 1 162 280 -0 L. 1 149 -► 81 22 - 1 US 7 196 ti j 0 � t P Lowe's, Hannaford, Olde Orchard Park, & Palace 9 Trip Generation: Enter: 432 Exit: 409 181 84 1 Kmart 7 Fayette 85 0 57 57 1228 22 Plaza J4 L J 4 %k 65 J 98 43 J R 18 Side 114 -+ .- 158 7 11 McIntosh Avenue Streets 13 ti r 24 133 r 21 Fayette Rd Fayette Rd 12j f 14 13 213 1243 1 6 Project Site US 7 Turning Movements at Major Intersection Representing Background Traffic To Points North Pine St 1 J L L Queen City Pk Rd J 1 L 2 y + 1 y 6 Queen City Pk Rd To Points North US 7 J Price Chopper + 1189 Off -Ramp Plaza r 1 t U57 3 J i 1189 On -Ramp 1 199 On -Ramp t r US 7 3 J 1 a 1 t US 7 � t r 3 2 7 Fayette Kmart 3 Plaza J 4 L J L 7 R S t 0 1 t L Side + 2 + + 0 + 1 McIntosh Avenue Lowe's, Hannaford, 2 -► Streets 9 ti r 14 4 I Olde Orchard Park, Fayette Rd tj t r Fayette Rd tj t r I & Palace 9 7 0 4 10 Percent Diverted: 25% Project Site US 7 Distribution of New Trips by Background Traffic Lowes 862 125,000 SF 143 149 292 Size from Google Earth Hannofords 850 39,000 SF 189 181 370 Size from Google Earth Olde Orchard Park 230 210 Units 73 36 109 Size from L&D 12/23/2013 Parking Study Palace 9 Cinema 444 1,000 Seats 27 43 70 Size from L&D 12/23/2013 Parking Study Total 432 409 841 Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30403395 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: PINE ST Road 3: Road 2: QUEEN CITY PK RD Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD I<< I < > >>I 1-2 of 2 AM Peak Hour 06/09/2009 EB SB W13 Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 7:45 4-F11 F 0 T 0 15 32 -6 T I T 0 33 F-6-'- 20 ' 35 0 55 103 8:00 AM 4 1 15 1 0 1 0 19 32 0T2 0 34 ' 0 23 36 0 59 112 8:15 4 4 21 25 33 0 4 0 37 0 28 37 0 65 127 3 0 0 38 0 Nvt 3 10 0 0 13 35 0 3 0 23 23 0 46 97 Total 15 57 0 0 72 132 0 10 0 142 0 94 131 0 225 439 PHF 0.94 0.68 0.720.94 0.63 0.93 0.84 0.89 0.87 HV % 13 11 1 30 7 1 Cars Trucks 2 Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Movenien&'9-2009 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM PINE ST ■ & QUEEN CITY PK RD 0 All A-Iotor'-,.-'ehicles S Peds &I Bike:- 131 WB 104 94 0 > EB 0 0 z Midday Peak Hour 06/09/2009 EB SB WB start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:00 1 11 0 0 12 [32 02 0 34 0 5 25 0 30 76-- 11:15 5 15 0 020 0 10 36 0 14 16 0 30 86- ._ -i11:30 3 17 0 020 0 3 0 52 0 19 25 0 44 1160- 11:45 8 21 0 029 ; 0 10 0 72 0 23 34 0 57 158.. Total 17 64 0 0 81 178 0 16 0 194 0 61 100 0 161 436 P H F 0.53 0.76 0.70 0.72 0.40 0.67 0.66 0.74 0.71 HV % 29 11 1 19 7 0 Cars Trucks Pedestrians PJ Bikes ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Movement 9,2009 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM r`t rl IPINE ST QUEEN CITY PK RD 17 31 64 EB 0 CC �D f` O r -*j 7 4-- 0 -0 ;II Motor ':r'ehide� s Peds °. E11ke3 a `. 0 0 0 o f�' Z 0 +-100 4— 61 �0 0 WB 161 242 PM Peak Hour 06/08/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 1 :30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 0 0 39 54 0 3 0 1 57 6 �17 30 0 47 143 A5 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 28 32 59 0 4 0 63 0 25 43 0 68 163 :00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 44 50 69 0 0 71 0 18 48 0 66 187 6 0 0 54 0 7 0 :15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 44 50 54 0 i - _ 61 0 21 41 0 62 Af773 Total 0 0 0 6— 0 22 149 0 0 171 236 0 16 0 252 0 81 162 0 243 666 PHF 0.920.85 0.860.86 0.57 0.89 0.81 0.84 0.89 HV % 14 2 0 0 4 0 Cars Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Move nienb:8:2009 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM A PINE ST QUEEN CITY PK RD 1 22 171 149 EB 0 0 A.Il Mktnr Vehicles & Peds Bikes mom" +-162 4-81 0 WB 243 385 Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30414280 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Road 1: QUEEN CITY PK RD Road 2: QUEEN CITY PK RD EXT 1« < > »1 1-2 of 2 Corridor: NA Road 3: K-MART ACCESS RD Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD AM Peak Hour 06/09/2009 NB EB SIB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 8 00 33 0 0 0 33 21 0 43 0 64 0 2 55 0 57 0 0 I 0 0 0 154 8.15 25 2 0 0 27 39 0 37 0 76 2 1 51 0 54 0 1 0 G 0 1 158 — - - 8:30 14 1 0 0 15 32 0 28 0 60 0 2 39 0 41 1 0 1 0 2 118 8:45 25 0 0 0 25 15 0 27 l 0 42 1 5 39 0 45 0 0 i 1 0 1 113 Total 97 3 0 0 100 107 0 135 0 242 3 10 184 0 197 1 1 2 0 4 543 PHF 0.730.38 0.760.69 0.78 0.80 0.38 0.50 0.84 0.86 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 HV% 7 0 13 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 Cars 0 Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30414280: Peak Hr Traffic by Moveman6:9�2009 8:00 AM to, 9:00 AM QUEEN CITY PK RD 8 QUEEN CITY PK RD EX 107 � o 242 0 —► EB 1.35 d CQ O �•II IvLdur '•:` hicl s c; Ped:-::_. E%F--_ 1Mr r'.;„ r IOU F-- 0 —� z WB Midday Peak Hour 06/09/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 6 1 0 0 27 0 36 0 63 0 3 13 0 16 0 o 0 0 [1061 11.15 AM ?9 0 [b -0 11:30 AM 6 0 0{ 25 20 10 49 0 �0 6 25 0 32 0 0 0 0 711:45 �12 � AM 18 11 2 0 1 31 27 1 39 0 67 0 9 13 0 22 1 1 0 2 Total 77 20 2 0 99 93 2 152 0 247 1 24 64 0 89 1 2 2 0 5 440 PHF 0.74 0.45 0.25 0.80 0.86 0.50 0.78 0.88 0.25 0.67 0.64 0.70 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.42 Hv % 1 0 0 5 50 2 0 4 9 0 0 0 ' Cars 2 Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30414280: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen6:9:2009 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM oa u, r <D fV QUEEN CITY PK RD QUEEN CITY PK RD EXT 1 ~_ 0 _♦ �.4 All Nlotor `d'ehicles 3 Peds 3. Bikes � 1 WB 2 1 owmp 93- 247 2 —� 5 EB 152 r- N N R C� z v PM Peak Hour 06/08/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 5:00 PM 46 - 17 0 0 63 61 3 65 0-- 1 ' 129 2 7 18 01 27 EDT 1 1 TO-1 2 221 L515 PrVi 49 20 0 69 73 7 45 0 125 1 W82 0 29 0 1 0 1 0 223 0 0 15:30 PM 43 28 0 71 74 7 47 0 128 0 7 17 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 F545 PM 43 19 1 6- 63 --72 116 2 10 18 0 30 0 0 0 0 1 0 209 Total 181 84 1 0 266 280 22 196 0 498 5 32 73 0 110 0 1 1 0 2 876 PHIF 0.920.75 0.25 0.94 0.95 0.79 0.75 0.97 0.63 0.80 0.91 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.25 HV % 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 3 5 0 0 0 Cars 2 Trucks 2 Pedestrians 2 Bikes Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30414775 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD I<<1 <1 >1 >> I 1-6 of 6 AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30 2 286 0 0 288 0 302 5 00 307,595 :45 9 333 0 0 342 0 40.3' 76 0 479 821 :00 4 319 0 0 323 0 369 69 0 438 761 :15 5 336 0 0 341 0 349 17 0 366 707 Total 20 1274 0 0 1294 0 1423 167 0 15902884 PHF 0.56 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.55 0.83 HV % 0 6 6 2 Cars 0 Trucks Pedestrians Bikes 7 8 8 ID 30414775: Peak Hr Traffic by Movement-28:2016 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM o to N M N tG d US-7 +� T N, A _ 0 --� All rylutor ","ehicles A. Ped- 3 Bikes p WB 187 x �0 . 0 EB 0 �— 0 --- o Cq N O M N N 2 Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:00 0 274 0 0 11:15 4 346 0 0 11:30 1 391 0 _0 0 0 11:45 6 339 274 0 256 12 0 268 542 350 0 342 11 0 353 703 392 0 329 7 0 336 728 345 0 359 9 0 '368 713 Total 11 1350 0 0 1361 0 1286 39 0 13252686 PHF 0.46 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.81 0.90 HV % 36 7 8 23 Cars 0 Trucks Pedestrians PJ Bikes ID 30414775: Peak Hr Traffic by MovemenB 28.2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM Ln M r y� M cD CO C) N rn � OII US-7 r 1..� NA �— 0 —� �.II blutur':'et-licle:_: Ped:_ E+il,e: x: Aaw 0 ,) 0 EB 0 WB PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 15 P 0 537 0 0 537 0 430 19 0 449 _ 86 4 30 PM 1 441 0 0 442 0 378 8 0 386 828 4:45 PN1 2 517 0 0 519 0 413 8 0 421 440 5:00 PNj 1 478 0 0 479 0 393 2 0 395 874 Total 4 1973 0 0 1977 0 1614 37 0 16513628 PHF 0.500.92 0.92 0.94 0.49 0.92 HV % 25 3 3 22 0 Cars © Trucks © Pedestrians 2 Bikes Peak Hour Data for Intersection Int ID: 30414774 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Corridor: Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: Road 4: QUEEN CITY PARK RD _1<<j < .d 1-2 of 2 j �j >> AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB EB SIB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total F7-. 4 5 M4 0 376 0 1 0 376 2 0 2 0 29 i 0 403 0 0 403 808 18:00 M 0 i361' 0, 0 1361 24 0 L7, 4 28 :382� --6-1 0 100 -0 1 382 771 1815 AM 0 1375 0 0 ] 375 �2 0 4 6 26 386,� 0 10 386 787 g4q_N�q 411 0 0 411 3 0 29 i343� :07ja_j 343 783 Total 0 1523 0 0 1523 96 0 16 0 112 0 1514 0 0 15143149 PHF 0.93 0.930.89 0,67 0.97 0.94 0.94 w % 6 8 19 6 Cars q Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Movem P-,n6 �28.2011 6 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM vs US-7 -*j & NA 0 ,".11 hMtor'vehicle- .3 Ped:s 8, Bike:-.. 0 WB ,am 4-0 0 96 EIB 16 0 Lr, 11!2 Lf z Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB EB SB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 1 :00 AM 0 341 0 61341119 0 10 0 29 0 293 0 0 293 60 1 :15 AM 0 358 0 0 ' 358271 0 ' 10 ' 0 37 0 359 0 0 359 754 11 :30 AM 0 403 0 0 403 21 : 0 9 0 30 0 348 0 0 348 781 11:45 AM 0 379 0 0 379125 0 5 0 30 0 373 0 0 1373 782, Total 0 1481 0 0 1481 92 0 34 0 126 0 1373 0 0 13732980 PFIF 0.92 0.920.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 HV % 6 9 6 7 2 Cars L� , Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Move ni e n6:28 .2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM US-7 & 0 All Motor '-Vehicles & Pedc 3 Bikes 0 WB 0 'Y= sow 0 o for V 92 I Ifibi-, 126 0 EB 34 0 t fol ti cc PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 NB EB SB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total — M 0 F61 3 0 0 613 40 0 2 0 42 0 526 0 0 526 1181 ' ' p 0 3 m 6 28 0 0 428 57 0 1 0 58 0 426 0 0 426 912 0 0 411 0 0 411 1053 0- 7 73 �445 PM 0 � 567 0 56 0 2 0 75 0 �4 0 o —0 89 T — 5.00 PM 0 44 0 60 447 384 0 0 384 920 Total 0 2055 0 6 2055256 0 8 0 264 0 1747 0 0 17474066 PHF 0.84 0.840.74 0.67 0.74 0.83 0.83 HV % 2 2 13 3 Cars 2 Trucks Pedestrians 2 Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Movenien8 27-201 6 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM A US-7 -*j L, a % WA 0 All INAntor 'Vehii--Jes & Ped S. Eiikp.� WB 0 4-0 0 2513 264 64 0 EB 8 0 r* LM LM \\,7CV Peak Hour Data for Intersection Int ID: 30403906 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: 1-189 WB OFF Road 4: SHOPPING CENTER ENTR <.j > 1 -4 of 4 AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total ' 30 M '45 Al, 0 0 154 1401 0 0 0 1 1 8.00 Ar, r80A 0 1941 0 1 1 154 0 239 1 0 1240 293 13 234 0 1540 9134 140 0 2701 0 0 270 329 7 240 0 576 986 194 0 241 0 -- 0 241 r2983 242 0 543 978 155 0 273 ` 6 0 273 7777 7 236 0 520 948 Total 0 643 0 2 643 0 1023 1 0 10241197 30 952 0 21793846 PHF 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.25 0.94 0.91 0.58 0.98 0.95 w % 3 7 0 9 20 2 P Cars P Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403906: Peak Hr Traffic byMovenienl5:28:20116 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM A. M V) 0 US-7 1- 189 W13 r--)FF J. 0 All Motor Vehicles Peds- & Bikes +-952 W B ./A 31 k 30 =9 1197 ■ > 0 ---►ON. Tflq�� 0 EB 1 0 hf Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:0DM 0 11531 0 153' 0 238 1 0 239 18 17 126 0 324 Ffi6 11:15 0 165 0 0 165 0 279 0 0 279 214 16 154 0 384 828 11:30 0 183 0 2 183 0 304 0 0 304 200 19 { 131 0 350 837 11:45 7 195 0 6 202 0 353 0 0 353 205 21 1141 0 367 922 Total 7 696 0 8 703 0 1174 1 0 1175 800 73 552 0 14253303 P HF 0.25 0.89 0.87 0.83 0.25 0.83 0.93 0.87 0.90 0.93 HV% 14 2 7 0 13 1 5 Cars U Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403906: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen6:28-2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM m u' r � C*1 U$-7 1-189 WB OFF .All Motor V,--hide 3 PedS u Bikes 1� I) EB 0 `-- 552 4— 73 r 800 ar • WB 1425 PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 NB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 45 PM 0 232 0 232 0 390 0 0 390 210 24 192 0 426 I1 44 5 00 PM 0 243 0 1 243 0 407 0 0 407 208 30 198 0 436'108 5:15 PM 0 179 0 0 179 0 419 0 0 419 250 24 255 0 529 �1127 5:30 PM 0 170 0 1 170 0 457 0 0 457 213 31 236 0 480 11 107. Total 0 824 0 2 824 0 1673 0 0 1673 881 109 881 0 18714368 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 HV % 2 1 6 0 3 0 Cars ® Trucks 0 Pedestrians 2 Bikes Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30403905 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: I-189 Road 4: I-189 I<< < > >>I 1-5of5 AM Peak Hour 06/12/2014 NB SIB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 30AM 0 117812481 0 426 0 368 127 ' 0 495 ' 921 :45 AM 0 12011313 313 _ 0 514 0 448 136 0 584 109 :00 AM 0 199 247 0 446 0 q84 66 0 665 1111 8:15 0 206' 281 0 487 0 41 0 1525 101 Total 0 784 1089 0 1873 0 1699 570 0 22694142 PHF 0.95 0.87 0.91 0.85 0.86 0.85 HV% 2 7 4 3 Cars 0 Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by MovemenS-12,2014 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM O G'+ r` o US-7 �1�... I-189 ♦_ 0 570 0 0 0 EB 0 All Motor Vehicles 3 Peds & Bikes f �.J low � A oft WB 10$9 Midday Peak Hour 06/12/2014 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 2:00 P 0 169 204 0 373 E07h4 149 0 4831856 2:15 PM 0 166 243 0 409 0 350 146 0 496 905', 2:30 P 0 158 277 0 435 0 339 181 0 520 955 2.45 PM 0 169 277 0 446 0� 381 164 0 545 991 I — _ —_ _ _ Total 0 662 1001 0 1663 0 1404 640 0 20443707 PHF 0.98 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.88 0.94 HV% 2 7 6 4 Cars v Trucks Pedestrians Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen6:12,2014 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM M % .5 M c/i Q n+ ri Q Q Q US-7 1-189 640 u EB 0 All Motor Vehicles .3 Reds & Bikes: 0 0 ..r Q WB 0 1001 PM Peak Hour 06/12/2014 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30 P 0 172 370 0 :45 P 0 169 363 0 5:00 P 0 175 407 0 5:15 P 0 162 398 0 542 0 413 231 0 6441186 532 0 434 246 0 680i1212 582 0 370 274 0 644 122 560 0 374 267 0 641 1201 Total 0 678 1538 0 2216 0 15911018 0 26094825 PHF 0.97 0.94 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.96 W% 1 3 3 1 �--' Cars 2 Trucks Pedestrians 0 Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by MovementA 2:2014 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM A F pp US-7 a I-189 1018 0 0 0 EB 0 pp r C1 Ol _ 4 0 — 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bikes 7 r.. i WB 1 33 8 Received CLERK'- OFF AE Received Sap 22, 2i 117 12.38E Recorded in VOL: 1u92 PG: 300 - i OF 80. Burlington Land Records Attest: Donna Kina'ille G tq Clark NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT CONDITION The date of this Notice is September -L�--, 2017. This Notice is made by Marilyn P. Larkin, an individual (the "Individual") and John Larkin, Inc., a Vermont corporation (the "Corporation"). Recitals A. The Individual is the owner of lands and premises in South Burlington, Vermont known as 1185 Shelburne Road, the lands and premises having been conveyed to her pursuant to a warranty deed, dated December 31, 2015, from Marilyn Larkin, Executrix of the Estate of John P. Larkin, recorded in Volume 1304, Page 085- of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington and a quit claim deed, dated August 3, 2017, from Larkin Milot Partnership, recorded in Volume 1387, Page 136- of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (together, the "Individual Lot"). B. The Corporation is the owner of lands and premises in South Burlington, Vermont known as 1195 Shelburne Road, the lands and premises having been conveyed to it pursuant to a warranty deed, dated June 6, 2017, from EF Farrell, LLC, recorded in Volume 321- of the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (the "Corporate Lot"). C. The Individual Lot and the Corporate Lot (collectively, the "Property") are depicted on a plan entitled "Overall Existing Site Plan and P.U.D. Plan," dated September 29, 2016, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc., recorded as Map Slide Wof the Land Records of the City of South Burlington (the "Plat"). C. Larkin Milot Partnership has obtained approval from the South Burlington Development Review Board (the "DRB") establish a planned unit development, consisting of a 87,972 square foot building which will include 60 residential units and 20,347 square feet of commercial space, on the Individual Lot and the Corporate Lot (the "Development Project"). D. The DRB, on July 6, 2017, issued its Findings of Fact and Decision (Final Plat Application #SD-17-12) approving the Development Project (the "Approval'). Among the conditions of the Approval, the DRB required that the Individual Lot and the Corporate Lot be a single lot for planning and zoning purposes. Terms and Provisions In consideration of Ten Dollars, the terms and conditions of the DRB approval and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Individual and the Corporation hereby declare as follows: 1 1-I 0 1:146467 Y = 1392 PG: 31:11 1. The covenant and agreement set forth in this Notice is for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of, and which shall run with, the Property until the condition of approval is modified or removed by the DRB or its successor - 2. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Approval. 3. For the purposes of planning and zoning compliance with the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, the Individual Lot and the Corporate Lot depicted on the Plat shall be considered one (1) lot of land for planning and zoning purposes (i.e., for coverage and dimensional requirements), even if such lots and/or the buildings constructed thereon are conveyed to separate owners. 4. Nothing in this notice or the conditions or covenants contained herein shall be construed to prevent the conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer of any interest in or to any one of the Individual Lot or Corporate Lot as separate and apart from the other lots, provided that the Individual or the Corporation or their heirs, administrators, successors and assigns, seek DRB approval for any subsequent subdivision of said lots pursuant to the Land Development Regulations, if applicable. 5. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be the Individual and the Corporation, or in the event of a sale of the Individual Lot or the Corporate Lot, the then owners of said lots or their duly authorized representatives. The City shall act upon any applications submitted by all of the owners of the lots, or their duly authorized representatives, (or, if the Individual Lot or the Corporate Lot is a common interest community, by the association in its own name or on behalf of the owners) and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the owners as to the respective rights of the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners (or, if applicable, the common interest community association) to provide written notice of any such applications to all others having an interest in the Property that may be affected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 6. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning or subdivision regulations, against the Property or activities or events occurring on the Property shall be brought against the owners of the Individual Lot or Corporate Lot or their duly authorized representatives. It shall be the duty of the owners of the Individual Lot or the Corporate Lot, or their duly authorized representatives, to provide written notice to all others having an interest in the said lots that may be affected by the enforcement proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief or penalties, shall be enforceable at the City's sole discretion against the owners of the Individual Lot or the Corporate Lot. 7. Any changes to the Plat shall require approval of the Board. 2 00046467 l V: 1392 PG: 302 8. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 9. This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the Owners and the Owners' successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Individual and the Corporation have executed this Declaration. JOHN LARKIN, INC. ),27q:ft �, By: �ZZ4� MARIL P. LARKIN Marilyn P arkin STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At South Burlington in said County and State on this 1 HT day of September, 2017, personally appeared Marilyn Larkin and she acknowledged this instrument by her signed and sealed to be her free act and deed. Before me ' J Ct_ -A-L�, Notary Public j Print Name: My Commission Expires: 2/10/19 At South Burlington in said County and State on this day of September, 2017, personally appeared Marilyn Larkin, duly authorized agent of JOHN LARKIN, INC., and she acknowledged this instrument by her signed and sealed to be her free act and deed and the free act and deed of LARKIN, INC. Before me ,<<, Notary Public Print Name: My Commission Expires: 2/10/19 \w 16833\135 Larkin-Milot 1195 Shelburne Rd notice of development conditions clean 090517.docx 3 END - MIX- MEW xtra Services & FeeS (check box, add fee as appmpnate) O I] Return Receipt (hardwpy) $ G 1 ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $ Pos Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ L Adult Signature Required $ - C ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ 'ostage i Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■ A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt, see a retail ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece. associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate ■ Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee, present this delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the ■ A record of delivery (including the recipient's retail associate. signature) that is retained by the Postal Service- Restricted delivery service, which provides for a specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent. Important Reminders: Adult signature service, which requires the ■ You may purchase Certified Mail service with signee to be at least 21 years of age (not First -Class Wile, First -Class Package Service", available at retail). or Priority Mail® service. Adult signature restricted delivery service, which ■ Certified Mail service is not available for requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age International mail. and provides delivery to the addressee specified ■ Insurance coverage is not available for purchase by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent with Certified Mall service. However, the purchase (not available at retail). of Certified Mail service does not change the insurance coverage automatically included with certain Priority Mail items, ■ For an additional fee, and with a proper endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request the following services: - Return receipt service, which provides a record of delivery (including the recipient's signature). You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Retum Receipt attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; ■ To ensure that your Certified Mail receipt is accepted as legal proof of mailing, it should bear a USPS postmark. it you would like a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, please present your Certified Mail item at a Post Office- for postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece. IMP09TAN11 Save this receipt for your records. Ps Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: �` bom �040 Nin 5 tfAC&PAI/ f A6 �I% �,�O (liIIIIII IiIIIII Illllll'llI � Il 9590 9402 1475 5329 5623 71 A. ❑ Agent X —,- w— I ) ❑ Addr,—b B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type ❑ Priority Mail Express® ❑AduIt Signature ❑ Registered Mail - ❑/Id ult Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Registered Mail Restricted Certified Mail® Delivery ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery ❑ Return Receipt for ,; +'U El Collect on Delivery Merchandise .. TM 9 Artide Number (Transfer from service label) ❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Dellvery ❑ Signature Confirmation ❑ Insured Mail ElSignature Confirmation 7 016 3 010 0001 1194 18 `)O)il Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt USPS TRACKING # 9590 9402 1475 5329 5623 71 United States Postal Service • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZlP+41 in this box• CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 r � PLANNING & ZONING July 7, 2017 Deborah Sherman Larkin Milot Partnership, LLC 410 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Final Plat Approval #SD-17-12 — 1185 & 1195 Shelburne Road Dear Ms. Sherman: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the Development Review Board on the above referenced project, the hearing for which was closed on June 20, 2017 (effective date 07/06/2017). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plans must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) within 180 days (must be submitted to me in time for recording along with a $15 recording fee by January 2, 2018) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, NaymndJ. Bel Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7016 3010 0001 1194 1870 - 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 7:22 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Final Comments on S r ea c, s PUD? (-44 7-AA/M, Ray, The Stormwater Section has reviewed "Larkin Terrace, Final Plat Permit Drawings" prepared by Krebs & Lansing, dated 9/29/16, last revised on 4/14/17. 1. The project proposes to develop/redevelop over 137,486 square feet of impervious surface on the parcel. This will require a stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 2. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of area. It will therefore require a construction stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. Work in the City Right Of Way (ROW) requires a permit before construction can begin. A "Permit to Open Streets or Right -Of -Way" can be obtained from the South Burlington Department of Public Works on their web site, or by stopping by their office located at 104 Landfill Road. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Regards, Dave David P. lklieeier distant Stormva-ater Superintendent Department ,, f Pubbc ',N'orlk:. -.r+�'""` Cite of South Burington f„862 6 5 3-7961 Exxt- 6113 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:33 PM To: Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com> Subject: RE: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Dave, The only other project I'm looking for comments on is the Larkin Terrace project, 1 believe they sent you the HydroCAD info a while ago, Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Emily Nosse-Leirer [mailto:enosse-leirer@ccrpcvt.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:30 PM To: Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com>; ray <rav@sburl.com> Subject: Re: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Thanks Dave. Please send comments to Ray, as I am only here on Tuesdays. He is cc'd here and can also let you know about any other comments he needs. Best, Emily From: Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:21:58 PM To: Emily Nosse-Leirer Subject: RE: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Emily, I will get you any additional comments by Friday. Are there any other plans on the agenda that need comment? Thanks, Dave �r^ . Hy David P. �klieeler . ssistant Stc+rmwater Superintendent Department of Public Wci6:s City: of South Burlington 62) 65 3-79b 1 Ext- 6113 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents- received or prepared for use in matters concerning Citv business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Emily Nosse-Leirer [mailto:enosse-leirer@ccrpcvt.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 2:12 PM To: Justin Rabidoux <iabidoux@sburl.com>; Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@sburl.com>; Terry Francis <tfrancis@sburl.com> Cc: ray <ray@sburl.com> Subject: Final Comments on Spear Meadows PUD? Hello all, I'm writing to check if any of you have additional comments on the Spear Meadows PUD. In their application materials, the applicant indicated that they had incorporated your comments from the preliminary review. Ray sent along the final application materials on May 24. The hearing is on June 20, so please let Ray and me know if you have any lingering comments/concerns by Friday. Thank you! ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:28 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project Ray, I'm OK with that Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clam bert(a)sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify its immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:00 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com>; Paul Conner <pconner@sburl.com> Subject: FW: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project Craig, Please review the responses to your comments below and let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Gregory Rabideau[ma ilto:greg@rabidea u-architects.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 4:57 PM To: ray <rav@sburl.com> Cc: Deb Sherman <DebSherman@larkinrealty.net> Subject: FW: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project Ray, Here are Jeff Hodgson's replies to your staff comments. These issues were addressed with Craig Lambert. Our expert stands by his work in light of the fact that the building owner, and not the city, will be responsible for maintaining them. Please review his replies shown in red letters below. Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects Inc. 550 Hinesburg Road, Suite 101 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone 802-863-022 E-mail: greR@rabideau-architects.com From: Jeff Hodgson [mailto:jhodgson wagnerhodgson.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:00 PM To: Gregory Rabideau; Skip McClellan; Michael McCormick Cc: Bill Nedde Subject: RE: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project G reg I agree (BTW I took David Grover off of the email chain assuming that it was not intentional to include him). Here are some of my thoughts: Plantings along Shelburne Rd are in the State of Vermont Right of Way and are not maintained by the City of South Burlington. Should check with the Agency of Transportation regarding plantings in their Right of Way. Owner has agreed to maintain this. Does somebody want to contact Agency? Bill do you have any connections there? Perhaps we just explain that owner will maintain and if they don't survive for some reason we will replace with lawn? Would not recommend under planting shrubs and perennials along Shelburne Rd. This is where the snow and salt from 3 lanes of traffic and the sidewalk will end up. We are comfortable with what we have specified there — rock solid, highly salt tolerant plants. Plant material begins 5' from curb and extends to 13' from curb. Sidewalks on both sides of ROW planting bed slopes away from bed minimizing salt exposure except from spray / plows. There are other places along Shelburne road where plant material is thriving inclose proximity to road. We feel that this planting is needed to make the pedestrian experience along this stretch of Shelburne Road a comfortable one. Any areas where trees are to be planted that are currently under pavement require soil replacement or soil restoration to a minimum depth of 2 feet to support tree growth. That is part of our specification / planting details. Due to their inherent tight branch structure, 'Princeton' Elms may pose structural problems as they mature, requiring pruning on a regular basis to reduce the potential for branch failure. For this reason a substitute species may wont to be considered. Wagner Hodgson reviewed with town Arborist and he was comfortable with them as long as City was not maintaining (ROW). All the above comments still apply (from email of October 18, 2015], islands to be planted with trees should be continuous planting pits filled with planting soil to a depth of 2 ft. or existing soil should be restored to provide a suitable medium for tree growth 1. Staff notes that the four bulleted comments above were included as part of the City Arborist's notes at the preliminary plat stage and the Board indicated these must be addressed at the Final Plat stage. ray From: Gregory Rabideau <greg@rabideau-architects.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 4:57 PM To: ray Cc: Deb Sherman Subject: FW: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project Ray, Here are Jeff Hodgson's replies to your staff comments. These issues were addressed with Craig Lambert. Our expert stands by his work in light of the fact that the building owner, and not the city, will be responsible for maintaining them. Please review his replies shown in red letters below. Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects Inc. 550 Hinesburg Road, Suite 101 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone 802-863-022 E-mail: greg@rabideau-architects.com From: Jeff Hodgson[mailto:jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:00 PM To: Gregory Rabideau; Skip McClellan; Michael McCormick Cc: Bill Nedde Subject: RE: Draft Staff Comments - Larkin Terrace Project G reg I agree (BTW I took David Grover off of the email chain assuming that it was not intentional to include him). Here are some of my thoughts: Plantings along Shelburne Rd are in the State of Vermont Right of Way and are not maintained by the City of South Burlington. Should check with the Agency of Transportation regarding plantings in their Right of Way. Owner has agreed to maintain this. Does somebody want to contact Agency? Bill do you have any connections there? Perhaps we just explain that owner will maintain and if they don't survive for some reason we will replace with lawn? Would not recommend under planting shrubs and perennials along Shelburne Rd. This is where the snow and salt from 3 lanes of traffic and the sidewalk will end up. We are comfortable with what we have specified there — rock solid, highly salt tolerant plants. Plant material begins 5' from curb and extends to 13' from curb. Sidewalks on both sides of ROW planting bed slopes away from bed minimizing salt exposure except from spray/ plows. There are other places along Shelburne road where plant material is thriving inclose proximity to road. We feel that this planting is needed to make the pedestrian experience along this stretch of Shelburne Road a comfortable one. I Any areas where trees are to be planted that are currently under pavement require soil replacement or soil restoration to a minimum depth of 2 feet to support tree growth. That is part of our specification / planting details. Due to their inherent tight branch structure, 'Princeton' Elms may pose structural problems as they mature, requiring pruning on a regular basis to reduce the potential for branch failure. For this reason a substitute species may want to be considered. Wagner Hodgson reviewed with town Arborist and he was comfortable with them as long as City was not maintaining (ROW). All the above comments still apply (from email of October 18, 2016], islands to be planted with trees should be continuous planting pits filled with planting soil to a depth of 2 ft. or existing soil should be restored to provide a suitable medium for tree growth 1. Staff notes that the four bulleted comments above were included as part of the City Arborist's notes at the preliminary plat stage and the Board indicated these must be addressed at the Final Plat stage. LRSG the science of insight 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, VT 05401 802.383.0118 www.rsginc.com LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 5.26.2017 :'- .- 'R: LARKIN REALTY RSG MARK SMITH, PE-1 DAVID GROVER, PE >) .) LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PREPARED FOR: LARKIN REALTY 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS....................................................................................................... 1 TripGeneration.................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Congestionanalysis........................................................................................................................................................... 1 PUDand Regulatory Restrictions....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES.... ....... __ ................................................................................ 4 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes and Adjustments............................................................................. 5 4.2 Other Development Volumes........................................................................................................ 5 4.3 Trip Generation..............................................................................................................................6 4.4 Existing Site Traffic........................................................................................................................8 4.5 Scenario Volume Graphics............................................................................................................8 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................10 5.1 Level -of -Service Definition...........................................................................................................10 5.2 Level -of -Service Results.............................................................................................................. 11 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................12 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................13 7.1 1 Crash Histories............................................................................................................................ 13 7.2 1 Sight Distance Observations....................................................................................................... 15 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT..........................................................................16 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING....................................................................................17 le 61 9.1 Vehicle Trips Ends....................................................................................................................... 17 9.2 PUD Parking................................................................................................................................ 18 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................. 18 10.1 City of South Burlington Road Impact Fees.............................................................................. 19 10.2 City of South Burlington Traffic Overlay District........................................................................ 19 10.3 Act 145 Traffic Impact Fees....................................................................................................... 20 BurlingtonRoundabout.................................................................................................................................................... 21 ChamplainParkway......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Fees................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................21 TripGeneration................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Congestionanalysis......................................................................................................................................................... 22 PUD and Regulatory Restrictions..................................................................................................................................... 22 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA APPENDIX F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION DATA FIGURE1: PROJECT SITE PLAN.................................................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS...................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS.............................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD.. ..................................... ............................................................. .................................. 9 FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD.............................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE 8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD...................................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD............................................................................................................................................ 10 FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ................................ 11 FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE 96 " PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES)............................................................................... 13 FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY............................................................................................................. 14 ii May 26, 2017 FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR.............................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY YEAR.................................................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE................................................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD............................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION......................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TOIFROM SURROUNDING AREAS...................................................................... 20 FIGURE21: ACT 145 FEES........................................................................................................................................................... 21 M iii 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS The proposed Larkin Terrace development is located in South Burlington, Vermont on the southwest corner of US-7 and Fayette Road. The development will replace an existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel and will create 60 new apartments, a 3,250-square foot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. Vehicular traffic will access the site from Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of its intersection with US-7. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION After accounting for internal trip capture and transportation demand management, we project the proposed development will generate an additional 40 PM peak hour trip ends compared to the existing vehicle trip generation at the site driveway and a net of 32 new PM peak hour trips on the surrounding roads network after accounting for pass -by trips. CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the development site and the existing plaza across the street (7 Fayette Road) will maintain Level of Service B. Delays at the intersection of US-7, Fayette Road, and McIntosh Avenue are projected to remain virtually unchanged with the US-7 main line operating at LOS A and the side streets operating at LOS D both with and without the development. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS The project will operate within the parking and trip end limits of the PUD and below the trip threshold of the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This study evaluates the traffic and related infrastructure impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace project on Fayette Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The site currently contains a 61-unit "all suites" hotel. This building will be removed and replaced with a mixed -use building that will contain 60 apartments (50 one -bedroom and 10 two -bedroom), a 3,250 square -foot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. As shown on the site plan below, the proposed development will have one access point via an existing curb cut on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of the intersection with US-7. Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 1: PROJECT SITE PLAN Fayette rFF 1 cn m O ai] f This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manualt Trip Generation,'' -A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,' Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NI UTCD),4 Traffic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide,s and the Vermont Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity, Alanual (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2010). ' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 911, Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). s American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 611, Edition (Washington DC: AASHTO, 2011). a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA), ITE, and AASHTO, Alanual on Uniforxn Trade Control Devices, 2009 Edition (Washington DC: FHW_A, 2009). ' Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Traffic Impact Embcation Slu(b, and Review Guide (October 2008). 2 May 26, 2017 r! '0' A State Desi,gn Standards,' which are the generally accepted traffic analysis references relied upon by traffic engineering professionals and VTrans for projects of this type in Vermont. VTrans guidelines specify that a traffic study should be considered if the proposed development will generate 75 or more peak hour trips. The geographic scope of the study should include the immediate access points and those intersections or highway segments receiving 75 or more project - generated peak hour trips.? We project that the site driveway will not meet the 75 vehicles per hour trip generation threshold. However, to provide a clearer picture of the traffic impacts of the development, we study capacity and congestion impacts at the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Drive intersection as well as the site driveway. The intersection of US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue is part of a high crash location segment, so we examine crashes at this intersection. We also examine the distribution of project related trips at the site driveway and the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection for permitting purposes. 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC The project site is located on Fayette Road. It is a two-lane, local road 40 feet wide at the site driveway and posted at 25 miles per hour. It connects US-7 (Shelburne Road) to the east with Hannafords Drive to the north. The road is unstriped until lane markings begin at the intersection with US-7 and leading up to Hannafords Drive. Across from the project driveway is a plaza (7 Fayette Road) containing a bank (Citizens Bank), a fast food restaurant (McDonalds), an urgent care facility (Concentra), a sit-down restaurant (Zen Gardens), a gym (Artemis Fitness), and a vacant store front that had been a categorized as a tavern (formerly Tilt). The traffic volumes associated with 7 Fayette Road are discussed below. The project is part of the L&M Park planned unit development (PUD) that includes 7 Fayette Road, a 1,000-seat cinema (Palace 9) and 210 residential units on Olde Orchard Park to the west. The section of US-7 proximate to Fayette Road is a five -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane) with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. In 2015, VTrans recorded an annual average daily traffic volume (AADT) of 31,130 vehicles per day along US-7 at station D577, approximately 0.4 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road intersection. Count data collected by VTrans in June of 2016 indicate the highest traffic volumes along US-7 occur during the weekday PM peak hours. Traffic impacts during this period are examined in this study. Since background traffic in the project area and trip generation is greater during the PM period than in the AM peak period, operational findings for the PM peak hour will be the same or less favorable than findings for the AM peak hour. Figure 2 shows the project location and study area intersections. G State of Vermont Agency of Transportation, 1.ermont State Standards (Montpelier: VTrans, 1 July 1997). 7 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Tragic Impact Evaluation Studj, and Review Guide (January 2003). ON 1 3 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS This section of US-7 was the subject of the 2012 report "Shelburne Road Corridor Study" prepared for the City of South Burlington and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and prepared by Parsons Brinkerhoff. This study found that level of service was generally good at the US-7 intersections close to the project site. Our findings are similar to the findings in the 2012 report. 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES This analysis examines design hour vehicle delays and queues at the site driveway and projects trip distribution at the following two intersections: 1. Site Driveway/Fayette Road 2. US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh avenue Vehicle delays and queues are examined first with baseline, No Build scenario, traffic volumes, which represent the anticipated design hour conditions in the target study years without the proposed development in place. Once baseline conditions are established, anticipated traffic associated with the proposed development is added to the No Build scenario volumes to create Build scenario traffic volumes, 4 May 26, 2017 x: a which are in turn used to project intersection delays and levels of service with the proposed development in place. A detailed description of the elements that contribute to the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes is presented below. 4.1 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS RSG obtained the most recent VTrans turning movemcnt count data at the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection (counted on June 30, 2016). This count data was used to establish background volumes at the site driveway. Trip Generation was used to establish turning movements at the site driveway and at the 7 Fayette Road driveway across the street. Following VTrans traffic study guidelines, raw peak hour traffic volumes were adjusted to represent the design hour volume (DHV)8 in 2017 and 20229 using two adjustment factors: Design hour adjustment factors are based on VTrans count station D577, which is located along US-7 in South Burlington, VT, just south of the intersection with IDX Drive. The 2015 DHV at this station was compared to the peak hour volumes at the intersection of US- 7/Holmes Road/IDX Drive on the date of the turning movement count to formulate DHV adjustments. This intersection is 0.3 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection and both intersections were counted on the same day. DHV adjustments decreased raw count volumes by 4%. 2. An annual adjustment factor representing general background traffic growth is based on historic count data at VTrans count station D577. From 2010 to 2015, AADT changed from 29,300 to 31,130 vehicles per day, or 1% per year. An adjustment factor of 2% was applied to the DHV adjusted counts to grow the traffic from 2015 to 2017. Traffic volumes on US-7 are expected to grow by 5% from the 2017 base year condition to the 2022 future year condition. 4.2 1 OTHER DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES Other development volumes (ODVs) represent trips generated by anticipated developments in the study area. Trips generated by ODVs are included in every scenario (both No Build and Build) because we assume they are already present on the road network in the analysis years. Through discussion with South Burlington Planning and Zoning staff, the following ODV was identified for inclusion in this study: 65 apartments are planned along Green Mountain Drive, approximately 0.6 miles south of the Fayette Road intersection with US-7. Per Trip Generation, this development is expected to generate 40 trips in the PM Peak Hour. Based on the 2016 turning movements at the US- 7/Green Mountain Drive intersection, half of these trips travel through the US-7/Fayette Road Intersection, and 2 trips from this development will pass by the project site driveway. "The DHV is the 30th highest hour of traffic for the year and is used as the design standard in Vermont. 9 VTrans requires analysis during the year project construction is expected to be complete and in a future year scenario 5 years after project completion. 5 r Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 4.3 1 TRIP GENERATION Trip generation refers to the number of vehicle trips originating at or destined for a particular development. Trip generation was used to determine the number of trips currently created by the existing Larkin Terrace (61 apartment -style hotel rooms) as well as the rest of the PUD and the traffic generated by the proposed Larkin Terrace development, which will consist of apartment residents, retail store patrons, and restaurant patrons. To estimate the number of new vehicle trips for the Larkin Terrace development, we examined trip generation rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation."' Applying trip generation rates for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 220 (Apartment), LUC 826 (Specialty Retail Center), and LUC 932 (High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant), we calculate the proposed land uses will generate 115 vehicle trips ends during the PM peak hour before accounting for internal capture, transportation demand management, and existing trips (see Figure 3). This development consists of several different types of uses, allowing trips originating from one land use to be destined for another land use within the development. For example, an apartment resident may walk to the onsite retail stores, or a restaurant patron may go home to an apartment. These trips are said to be captured internally and are not counted towards the number of trips generated by the development on the adjacent transportation network. We used the NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation forMiixced-Use Developments" to calculate a 42% reduction in trips due to internal capture (48 trips). Internal capture calculations are included in the Appendix. External site generated traffic can be differentiated between primary and pass -by trips. While primary trips represent people who leave their home, place of work, or other origin expressly to visit the site and who would not otherwise have gotten into their vehicle to make a trip, pass -by trips represent vehicles that currently pass by the site on the local road network and who, when the proposed development is present, turn into the site on their way to another destination. Pass -by trips are converted from through movements to turning movements to and from the site at the development access points but do not add new trips to intersections beyond the site access. The percentage of trips that are considered pass -by is based on Trip Generation. Pass -by traffic is typically assumed to come from vehicles passing by the site on an immediately adjacent roadway to which the site directly accesses. However, due to the relatively low volume of through traffic along Fayette Road in the vicinity of the site and the relatively high volume of traffic on US-7, we have assumed the pass -by portion of trip generation will come from US-7 through trips at its intersection with Fayette Road. Due to the nature of the project, the percentage of pass -by trips will vary by land use, and, according to Trip Generation, will be approximately 10% of site generated external trips.' Transportation demand management (TDM) is the practice of reducing the number of trips during peak hour travel times by providing alternative travel means (discussed in further detail later in this "' Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (\Vashington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). 't Bochner, Brian S., Kevin Hooper, Benjamin Sperry, and Robert Dunphy. Enhancing Internal Tiip Caphar EstimationforMzxed Use Developments (Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research board — National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2011). 6 May 26, 2017 (r l study). Physical TDM measures include being located near a bus stop with a shelter, having access to and providing continuity of sidewalks and transit near building entrances, and providing accommodations for bike storage on site (including both covered and uncovered bicycle parking areas). These TDM accommodations can facilitate up to a 6% reduction in external vehicle trip generations- (the maximum allowed for only physical TDM measures). The site currently contains a 61-room apartment style hotel which, according to Trip Generation, currently generates 11 and 13 entering and exiting trips respectively during the PM peak hour. These 24 trips are subtracted from the development traffic to determine that the development will add 40 new trips to the surrounding road network, including 8 pass -by trips. Figure 3 presents the projected trip generation, broken out into total trips, internal capture, primary traffic, TDM reduction, and pass -by traffic. FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Projected PM Peak Hour r Generation Total Enter Exit Apartments (LUC 220, 60 units) 24 13 37 Specialty Retail Center (LUC 826, 17,097sq ft) 20 26 46 High -Turnover (Sit-Down)Restaurant(LUC932,3,250sgft) 19 13 32 Total 63 52 115 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 24 24 39 28 115 Primary Pass -By Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 34 25 5 3 67 6%TDM Primary Trip Reduction* 2 1 0 0 3 Total Development Trips 32 24 5 3 64 Existing trips 11 13 0 0 24 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 21 11 5 3 40 *"TDMGuida nce" Wrans, 2016. (Bus stop with shelter, Transit/walk access site design, Bicycle racks, 6%max) Figure 4 presents a map of the estimated distribution of the net 40 new project -generated trips. Net primary and pass -by trips entering and exiting the site access are distributed onto the roadway network based on background traffic volumes. Twenty-four of the 64 trips are not included here since the site already generates 24 trips. As discussed above, the reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection is due to pass -by traffic and corresponds with an increase in turns onto and off of Fayette Road as vehicles that previously passed by the site divert into the site when the development is complete. 12 Vermont Agency of Transportation. TDM Guidance. 2016. Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS 7 Fayette US-7 0 0 0 5 -2 0 0 0 L 0 2 0 > Q °J 0♦ t 0 0♦ ♦ 1 C v o M 9 17 6 -y 0 c T1 t Fm W1 t I 6 0 8 11 -2 0 Site Driveway US-7 4.4 1 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC The existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel generates 24 trips during the PM peak hour. This building would be replaced by the proposed development. Traffic volumes estimated at the site driveway intersection under No Build conditions include these 24 trips as well as trips coming from and going to the plaza across Fayette Road. Due to a vacant unit, the total number of trips associated with the plaza driveway were estimated from Trip Generation assuming full occupancy. Figure 5 shows trips associated with these land uses. Building sizes were taken from the December 23, 2013 parking study by conducted by Lamoureux and Dickinson on behalf of Jim Carroll and the permitting associated with Tilt at 7 Fayette Road. FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 5 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 Formerly Ti It (Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Total 306 4.5 1 SCENARIO VOLUME GRAPHICS Figure 6 through Figure 9 present the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes at the two study area intersections in the build year (2017) and the future year (2022). No Build traffic volumes include the raw count volumes, adjusted to design hour conditions, and projected traffic from a recently permitted development in the area (ODV). Build scenario volumes represent the addition of project -generated traffic (both primary and pass -by trips) to the No Build traffic volumes. 8 May 26, 2017 (w) With the addition of project -generated traffic, volumes entering and exiting the project site increase in the Build scenario and these trips are carried out through the US-7 intersection. The reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection in the Build scenario is due to the increase in pass -by traffic as described in the Trip Generation discussion above. These trips previously passed by Fayette Road in the No Build scenario but turn into and out of the site once the project is in place. FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 Fayette US-7 85 0 57 52 1231 22 .t ♦ �► ♦ S. 0 � c 0 65 -0 98 41 -0 18 � W Q QJ 113 -op- 4-158 7 -► 10 N v o 4 -y I- 7 127 -y or21 It t F( t F 8 0 5 201 1245 16 Site Driveway US-7 FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD 7 Fayette US-7 85 0 57 57 1229 22 .� ♦ �. A.? ♦ 'A � c 0 65 -0 1698 43 -0 18 � � Q 4-1 113 -► ♦ 158 7 y 11 N a o 13 24 133 21 c t �►� t 2 14 0 13 212 1243 16 Site Driveway US-7 NE C Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 Fayette US-7 90 0 60 54 1292 24 ■ � c 0 69 -0 R- 103 43 -0l R 18 > � Q Y 119 -► f- 166 7 -► 4- 10 F- v 0 4 �- 7 134 22 C: W1 t Fm 1% t I 8 0 5 212 1307 16 Site Driveway US-7 FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD 7 Fayette US-7 90 0 60 59 1290 24 -0 c 0 69 103 45 - 18 > z Q cu 119 166 7 -► ♦ 11 r_ Ln a 0 13 nk r 24 140 22 F- 14 0 13 223 1305 16 Site Driveway US-7 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE DEFINITION Level -of -service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. LOS is calculated using the procedures outlined in the 2000 and 2010 Highway Capacity Manuals.13 In addition to traffic volumes, key inputs include the number of lanes at each intersection, traffic control type (signalized or unsignalized), and the traffic signal tuning plans. 73 The HCN1 2010 does not provide methodologies for calculating intersection delays at certain intersection types including signalized intersections with exclusive pedestrian phases and signalized intersections with non NEM.-�-standard phasing. Because of these limitations, HCI\I 2000 methodologies are employed where necessary. 10 1 May 26, 2017 The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual defines six qualitative grades to describe the level of service at an intersection. Level -of -Service is based on the average control delay per vehicle. Figure 10 shows the various LOS grades and descriptions for signalized and unsignalized intersections. FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The delay thresholds for LOS at signalized and unsignalized intersections differ because of the driver's expectations of the operating efficiency for the respective traffic control conditions. According to HCM procedures, an overall LOS cannot be calculated for two-way stop -controlled intersections because not all movements experience delay. In signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections, all movements experience delay and an overall LOS can be calculated. The VTrans policy on level of service is: • Overall LOS C should be maintained for state -maintained highways and other streets accessing the state's facilities • Reduced LOS may be acceptable on a case -by -case basis when considering, at minimum, current and future traffic volumes, delays, volume to capacity ratios, crash rates, and negative impacts as a result of improvement necessary to achieve LOS C. • LOS D should be maintained for side roads with volumes exceeding 100 vehicles/hour for a single lane approach (150 vehicles/hour for a two-lane approach) at two-way stop -controlled intersections. Detailed Synchro LOS worksheets are available in the Appendix. 5.2 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS The l lighway Capacity Manual congestion reports within Synchro (0), a traffic analysis software package from Trafficware, routinely relied upon by transportation engineering professionals, were used to assess traffic congestion at the site driveway. During the weekday PM peak hour most approach delays in the study area are projected to remain essentially unchanged with the addition of development volumes. At the site driveway on Fayette Road, LOS is projected to remain at A in both 2017 and 2022. Delays at the project driveway and 7 Fayette are projected to remain at LOS B. Similarly, at the intersection of US-7 and Fayette Road, the mainline (US-7) approaches are projected to remain at LOS A and side line approaches are projected to remain at D. The only exception is the northbound left lane, which is projected to change from LOS B to LOS C. (y � Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study Figure 11 presents the LOS results during the weekday PM peak hour. FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS PM Peak Hour 2017 No Build 2017 Build 2022 No Build 2022 Build LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c US-7 / Fayette Rd / Macintosh Ave Overall a A 8 0.59 A 8 0.62 A 8 0.66 A 9 0.69 EB, left/thru from Fayette Dr D 46 0.35 D 45 0.35 D 45 0.35 D 45 0.35 EB, right from Fayette Dr D 46 0.38 D 46 0.41 D 46 0.42 D 46 0.44 WB, along Maclntosh Ave D 45 0.23 D 45 0.23 D 45 0.23 D 44 0.23 NB, I eft from US 7 B 14 0.61 B 16 0.65 B 19 0.69 C 22 0.73 NB, thru/right from US 7 A 5 0.48 A 6 0.48 A 6 0.50 A 6 0.50 SB, I eft from US 7 A 3 0.07 A 3 0.07 A 3 0.08 A 3 0.08 SB, thrufrom US 7 A 3 0.43 A 3 0.43 A 3 0.45 A 3 0.45 SB, right from US 7 A 2 0.03 A 2 0.04 A 2 0.03 A 2 0.04 Fayette Rd / 7 Fayette / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 A 3 0.05 WB, along Fayette Dr A 0 0.01 A <1 0.02 A <1 0.01 A <1 0.02 NB, exiti ng Site Drive B 12 0.03 B 12 0.05 B 12 0.03 B 12 0.05 SB, exiting 7 Fayette B 12 0.22 B 13 0.23 B 13 0.24 B 13 0.25 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the congestion analysis, estimated average 95th percentile queues were evaluated using SimTraffic.14 Queues at the Fayette Road/Project driveway intersection are projected to remain virtually unchanged with the addition of project generated traffic (Figure 12). At the US- 7/Fayette/McIntosh intersection, queues do not change by more than on car length in 2017. In 2022, queues in the northbound left and through/right lanes are projected to increase by 2 and 6 car lengths, respectively. The existing lanes are able to accommodate this increased queuing. Detailed SimTraffic queuing worksheets are available in the Appendix. 11 Ten hour-long simulations were averaged together to estimate queue lengths. As each run is different, a difference in a few cars should not be seen as significant. 12 1 May 26, 2017 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE 951" PERCENTILE QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES) PM Peak Hour 2017 2022 No Build No Build US-7 / Fayette Rd / Macintosh Ave EB, left/thru from Fayette Dr 2 3 3 3 EB, right from Fayette Dr 2 2 3 3 WB, along Macintosh Ave 3 3 2 3 NB, Ieft from US 7 7 8 7 9 NB, thru/rightfrom US 7 7 7 8 13 SB, left from US 7 1 1 2 1 SB, thrufrom US 7 8 7 7 7 SB, right from US 7 2 1 2 2 Fayette Rd / 7 Fayette / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr 2 3 2 2 WB, along Fayette Dr 1 1 0 1 NB, exiting Site Drive 1 1 1 2 SB, exiting 7 Fayette 3 2 3 3 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS 7.1 1 CRASH HISTORIES VTrans maintains a statewide database of all reported crashes along all state highways and federal aid road segments.15 Crash histories were collected from the VTrans Public Crash Data Query ToOI16 for the 5-year period associated with the most recent VTrans High Crash Location Report17 Qanuary 2010-December 2014). Within this 5-year period, one crash occurred within design stopping sight distance (155 feet at 25 miles per hour) of the site access point. This crash was from a left turn out of the plaza driveway across from the site access. The US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection is part of a designated VTrans High Crash Location (HCL) segment, which means the actual crash rate observed over the past five years is higher than comparable segments across the state with similar functional classification and traffic levels. Since some traffic from this development will proceed through this intersection, we examined crashes on US-7 within the stopping sight distance (250 feet at 35 miles per hour) of the intersection. One injury and one fatality resulted from the 47 crashes at this intersection. This section is ranked 551 out of 647 sections (lower numbers are more severe). As indicated in Figure 13, crashes in this area occur most frequently when there is more traffic on the roads during the later half of the day. Crashes are more prevalent in the second half of the year although there is no clear correlation between crashes and time of year (Figure 14). The five-year trend does not show any significant change in crash rate over the past five years of available data (Figure 15). 75 This data is exempt from Discovery or Admission under 23 U.S.C. 409. 16 http://apps.vtrans.vermont.gov/CrashPubhcQueryTool/ 17 http://vtrans.vermont.gov/sites/aot/files/planning/2010- 2014%20Formal%20High%20Crash%20Location%20Report.pd f M 1 13 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Stucy FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY 6 7 L 6 v` 5 0 4 3 z 0 Q C Q Q Q Q <z Q Q Q Q Q a a n a c a a a a a a a N r1 N M cr 6ry %D h 00 T O rl N 'y N M 00 T .-1 rl rl rl rl r4 Time of Day FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR 9 8 v 7 6 u 5 w 0 v 4 E 3 z 2 0 ■ • • Jan Feb Mar Api May Jun Jul Month FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY YEAR 12 10 v r 8 N U o 6 v E 4 M Z 2 0 2010 2011 2012 Year Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 2014 About half the crashes are rear end crashes, which suggests that congestion is the most likely factor associated with crashes at this location (Figure 16). 14 1 May 26, 2017 C� FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE in 25 20 �j 15 0 10 0 - - - - - - - z k�a \ca O� �� \fie yae �,.ae ear �1'3 Q� eaa e5� ,er oaa otia ti° O Q Crash Type The 2012 Parsons Brinkerhoff report on the US-7 corridor mentions high crash locations north of the study area. It also found that many of the crashes in this area are rear end crashes, which are associated with congestion. That report provided a number of recommendations for improving safety including providing alternate routes that parallel US-7 and improving access management along this section of US-7. Traffic from this project will use an existing road at a traffic signal, so it will not exacerbate the access management issue. Overall, the congestion is a corridor -wide issue and it will take a corridor -wide solution. Implementing the recommendations from the 2012 study will help alleviate congestions on US-7 and make this a safer road. 7.2 1 SIGHT DISTANCE OBSERVATIONS As defined in the 2011 publication A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), sight distance is the "the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver."" Sight distances of sufficient length are necessary at all points along a roadway to ensure vehicles can safely stop or avoid colliding with potential obstructions or other vehicles on the roadway. Standard practice in assessing intersection safety and operations involves measuring two separate sight distances — stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance. In this section, we examine sight distances at the site driveway on Fayette Road. Stopping sight distance is the visible distance along a roadway between an advancing motorist and a potential obstacle in the roadway. It is measured from a point representing the approaching driver's eye and a point representing an obstacle in the roadway. Stopping sight distances of adequate length are needed along all roadways, both at and away from intersections, so that drivers travelling at design speeds can react to potential obstacles and safely brake to avoid collisions. Design minimum to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American _association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-2. M 1 15 a Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study stopping sight distances are calculated based on factors such as design speed, response times, and grades as reported in the 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.'9 Intersection sight distance is the distance available along the major road travelled way corresponding with the maximum visibility between an advancing motorist on the major road and an entering motorist on an intersecting minor road. It is measured between a point representing the advancing driver's eye above the major road and the entering driver's eye above the intersecting road. The 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets states that the available intersection sight distance should be at least equal to the required stopping sight distance along the major road, which in this case equals 155 feet. "Sight distance is also pro tided at intersections to allow the dtimrs of stopped vehicles a sr,! rcient dew of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter the intersecting highway or to a ws it. If the available sight distance for an entering or trussing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major mad, then drivers have sufficient sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. "20 However, when possible it is desirable to have intersection sight distances that exceed the design minimum stopping sight distances in order to offer improved operations, such that major road traffic need not decelerate to accommodate entering traffic. "However, in some cases a major -road vehicle may need to stop or slow to accommodate the maneuver by a minor road vehicle. To enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are desirable along the major road. "21 Based on the posted speed limit of 25 mph for Fayette Road, the design minimum stopping sight distance and intersection sight distances is 155 feet and the ideal target intersection sight distance is 280 feet. On October 19, 2016, RSG staff observed sight distances at the site driveway and along Fayette Road, and found both stopping and intersection sight distances to exceed these standards to the south. The distance between the site driveway and Fayette Road's intersection with tJS-7 to the north is less than the intersection sight distance for vehicles turning right out of the site driveway, and vehicles can see clear to the intersection. 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Recent VTrans guidance" defines Transportation Demand Management (TDM) as "a broad set of strategies that strive to either reduce or reallocate automobile travel to achieve benefits such as reduced roadway congestion, improved air quality, reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, 19 American association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,.), Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-5. 20 American association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 21 American association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Po§g on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 2' March 2016, Transportation Demand Danagement (TDN\ Guidance, N'Trans Policy & Planning 16 1 May 26, 2017 reduced parking demand, improved public health for those biking or walking, and reduced commuting and travel costs." This guidance suggests several measures and combinations of measures for TDM that help reduce trip generation from new developments. Specifically, these reductions are applied to the expected trip rates computed from Trip Generation as a percentage. Relevant measures proposed by the Larkin Terrace development fall into the Physical category, and include: - Project location in a mixed use urban area, and on a moderate service transit line (headways of 30 minutes or less) - A bus stop with a shelter within 600 ft. of the project entrance. - Bicycle racks located conveniently on -site - A site design with connections to adjacent sidewalks and transit stop(s) Per the VTrans methodology, each measure has a percent trip reduction associated with it. The aggregate for this development exceeds the maximum allowed of 6%; thus a 6% reduction was applied. 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING The L&M Park PUD limits the number of vehicle trips ends (VTE) associated with the PUD and allows for shared parking between the different uses in the PUD. This section demonstrates that the proposed project will not exceed the restrictions associated with the PUD. 9.1 1 VEHICLE TRIPS ENDS Per the L&M PUD agreement, the number of WE associated with the PUD is limited to 623 total trips. Figure 17 shows 549 WE will be associated with the proposed development and the other existing land uses in the PUD. This number does not account for internal capture between different land uses, only internal capture within Larkin Terrace Development. The WE would be fewer if internal capture were accounted for. These 549 WE is below the 623 limit. A May 6, 2008 study of the PUD by Clough Harbor & Associates found a significantly higher number of WE associated with the PUD. Since that time, the trip generation rate associated with some of the land uses, LUC 912 (Drive -In Bank) in particular, has decreased, which resulted in an overall lower number of WE associated with the PUD. 17 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Stucy FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD Larkin Terrace Development Varies, see Figure 3 37 27 64 Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 5 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 Formerly Tilt (Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Olde Orchard Park 230 210 Units 73 36 109 Palace 9 Movie Theater 444 1000 Seats 27 43 70 Total 549 9.2 1 PUD PARKING A 2013 parking study by Lamoureux and Dickenson determined that 490 parking spaces currently exist within the limits of the PUD. The proposed project will remove 44 parking spaces as part of the removal of the existing Larkin Terrace buildings and will install 148 new spaces (55 garage spaces and 93 surface spaces) as part of the new development. This represents a net increase of 104 spaces within the PUD. The PUD-wide parking plan from the 2013 parking study and the projects' site plan showing parking are included in the Appendix. The South Burlington 2016 Land Development Regulations (LDR) prescribe the minimum number of parking spaces a land use is required to have available. In cases where multiples uses are present and those uses will have different peak parking needs, they allow for shared parking. This study examined parking demand at different times of day and different times of year23 to determined that the overall peak parking demand for the PUD will occur 8-10 pm on a weekday between Christmas Day and New Year's Day (see Appendix for a matrix of shared parking demand calculations). It was found that 646 parking spaces will be required at the peak time. After the improvements associated with the Larkin Terrace Development, there will be 594 spaces available. A waiver of up to 25% is available to the PUD, but only an 8% waiver will be required: (646-594)/646 = 8.1%. 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The Larkin Terrace development is potentially subject to two separate Traffic Impact Fees from the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont via Act 145. The project also has trips that enter an intersection within South Burlington's Transportation Overlay District. This section provides sufficient information to calculate relevant fees and demonstrates that the development is in compliance with the current regulations. 23 Hourly and monthly adjustment factors were taken from the Llrban Land Institute's Sharked Parking, Second Edition, 2005. Their methodology was used to calculate share parking demands. 18 1 May 26, 2017 10.1 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ROAD IMPACT FEES This City Impact Fee Ordinance levies a Road Improvement Impact Fee for residential developments that increase the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential developments that increase the number of PM peak hour trips. Figure 18 shows the number of new development units and trips associated with the Larkin Terrace project. The number of dwelling units is the number of new units (60) minus the number of existing units which will be removed (61), indicating a net reduction in the number of dwelling units. The number of non-residential PM peak hour trips includes reductions for internal capture and TDM measures by the following method. First, the total non-residential trip generation is determined by summing the entering and exiting volumes generated from the retail and restaurant uses as show in Figure 3 (78 trips). Next, internal capture reductions (35 trip) are found by multiplying the entering and exiting volumes generated from the retail and restaurant uses by their respective internal capture rates from the NCHRP report 684 worksheets (see Appendix). Subtracting the internal capture reductions from the total trip generation yields 43 trips. Finally, these 43 trips are reduced by 6% to account for TDM measures to yield the 40 non- residential PM peak hour trips. FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION Road Impact Fee: Dwelling Units and Trips Net Single Family Dwelling (Units) 0 Net Multi -Family Dwelling (Units) 0 Non -Residential PM Peak Hour (Trips)* 40 *Includes reductions for internal capture and TDM 10.2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON TRAFFIC OVERLAY DISTRICT South Burlington restricts traffic from developments that used roadways within its Traffic Overlay District. This parcel is in Traffic Overlay Zone 2C (access to a high -volume roadway via a public roadway or a private driveway with a roundabout or a signalized intersection) and therefore has a budget of 0.75 trips per 1,000 square feet (ksf)-}. The PUD generates a total of 549 trips (Figure 17). The project encompasses two property areas: the PUD (1,460 kso and 1195 Shelburne Road (95 ks fl. As shown in Figure 19, the project is limited to a maximum of 1,166 trips accessing the US-7/Fayette Road intersection. FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY Parcel • •Budget* PUD Land 2C 0.75 1,460 1,095 1195 She I bu rn e Road 2C 0.75 95 71 Total 1,166 *Trips/ksf, based on 30trips per 40,000sf The 1,166-trip budget relates to the total number of trips generated by the site that accesses the high - volume roadway regardless of existing trips. Therefore, existing trips are not considered. However, -a South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 2016. 10 fl, p 179, 30 trips per 40,000 square feet 0 1 19 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study not all of the 549 trips generated by the PUD access US-7, so not all of these should count against the trip budget. Since the number of trips generated by the PUD (549) is significantly less than the total trips allowed to access US-7 (1,166), it is clear that the PUD trip generation is less than the trips budget allowed by this TOD, and it is not necessary to account for PUD trips that do not access US- 7. 10.3 1 ACT 145 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Act 145 requires new developments to pay part of the costs of VTrans funded transportation improvements that their trips will impact. Although there are currently no VTrans funded improvements in the projeces immediate vicinity, we understand VTrans' policy is to look at the trip distribution and determine if any trips may travel through a location of planned improvements. The future development is expected to have 64 PM peak hour trips at the project driveway, but only 32 new trips to/from surrounding areas. Note that new pass -by trips (8) and existing trips (24) are not included in this summary as they are not new to the surrounding road network. Figure 20 summarizes the distribution of these 32 new trips to/from areas beyond the project intersection. This distribution is based on the turning movement counts at the project intersections. FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS Discussions with VTrans indicate that two VTrans projects may receive new trips from this development: the Burlington Roundabout to the north on US-7 and the Champlain Parkway to the northwest. To determine trip distribution to these projects, we looked at available PM peak hour turning movement counts between the project site and these two VTrans projects. W'here turning movement counts were not available, we examined trip generation of existing land uses. Existing turning movements, a diagram of turning movements at major intersections, the resulting new trip 20 1 May 26, 2017 distribution, and trip generation data are included in the Appendix. The sizes of land uses are based on aerial photography measured in Google Earth where the exact size was not available. BURLINGTON ROUNDABOUT We estimate that 3 PM peak hour trips originate from the north on US-7 and zero trips are destined for the north on US-7. Background traffic at major intersections indicates that 1 of these 3 will come from the I-189 offramp, and turning movements at other streets along US-7 indicate that another trip will likely come from one of these side streets. This results in 1 PM peak hour trip traveling through the Burlington Roundabout project. CHAMPLAIN PARKWAY We estimate that 9 PM peak hour trips originate from the northwest and G trips are destined for the northwest in the vicinity of Pine Street. These trips connect to Pine Street via Fayette Road, the Kmart shopping center plaza, and Queen City Park Road. Turning movement counts are not available between Fayette Road and the Kmart Plaza, so trip generation for the existing land uses (Palace 9, Olde Orchard Park, Lowe's, and Hannaford) is used to provide a sense of traffic associated with these land uses. Given the large number of trips generated by these land uses (841 in total), it would be conservative to assume that 25% of traffic between Fayette Road and Queen City Park Road is associated with these land uses. After removing these trips from the project's new traffic to/ this area, the remaining trips were distributed according to turning movement counts at Queen City Park Road's intersections with the Kmart plaza and Pine Street. It was found that 4 trips originated on Pine Street and 2 trips were destined for that area. However, the Champlain Parkway will cause the intersection with Pine Street to be disconnected and drivers will be forced to take an alternate route. Based on the possible destinations from Pine Street, we estimate that about one third of these G trips will utilize routes that do not include the Champlain Parkway. This results in 4 PM peak hour trip traveling through the Champlain Parkway project. FEES Based on the recommended Act 145 fees associated with each project which VTrans provided, we calculate the total Act 145 fees in Figure 21. The Act 145 fees come to $9,205. FIGURE 21: ACT 145 FEES Project Fee per Roundabout $1,217 1 $1,217 Champlain Parkway $1,997 4 $7,988 Total $9, 205 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RSG has conducted an analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace development located in South Burlington, Vermont. The proposed development would be 60 apartments, a 3,250-square foot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. The project would ME 121 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study replace an existing 61-unit apartment -style hotel. The site entrance and exit will be on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of US-7 and aligned opposite an existing plaza access. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION We project the proposed development will generate approximately 40 net trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Of this total, we project that 8 trips will be pass -by trips (vehicles already passing by the site on US-7) meaning the development with add 32 trips to the surrounding roads network. CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the site and 7 Fayette across the street will maintain LOS B. The LOS at US-7 intersection with Fayette Road and McIntosh Avenue will also remain virtually unchanged with mainline traffic experiencing LOS A and side line traffic experiencing LOS D both before and after the development installed. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS With the additional of project related traffic, the PUD trip generation will be within the trip limits of both the PUD and the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. Parking for the PUD will require an 8% waiver, which is less than the 25% waiver allowed. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the proposed Larkin Terrace development will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. 22 May 26, 2017 C c APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS Dw a ".a "j— Adb. Raw fauns cwN, B.Id TO G—M T,o Gene.— Td. 6wwratlon Bultl N. B.im Wid (R—e Etl L 2 ::Ll "Z ;I_ N, 17.1 El APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE NCHRP 8-61 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool Project Name: Larking Terrace Organization: RSG Project Location: South Burlington, VT Performed By: DKWG Scenario Description: Build Volumes Date: 15-May Analysis Year: 2017 / 2022 Checked By: MCS Analysis Period: PM Street Peak Hour Date: 15-May Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) Estimated Vehicle -Trips ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 46 20 26 Restaurant 32 19 13 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 37 24 13 Hotel 0 All Other Land Uses2 0 Total 115 63 52 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Veh. Occ. %Transit %Non -Motorized Veh. Occ. %Transit %Non -Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses2 Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail 600 Restaurant 600 Cinema/Entertainment Residential 600 600 Hotel Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix" Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 6 0 7 0 Restaurant 0 5 0 2 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 115 63 52 Internal Capture Percentage 42% 38% 46% External Vehicle-Tri PS3 67 39 28 External Transit-Tri PS4 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized T rIPS41 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A N/A Retail 35% 50% Restaurant 42% 54% Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A Residential 38% 31 % Hotel N/A N/A Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Informational Report, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator 3Vehicle-tripscomputed using the modes lit and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P °Person -Trips `Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas Transportation Institute C Project Narne:1 Larking Terrace Analysis Period:1 PM Street Peak Hour Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle -Trip Ends to Person -Trip Ends Land Use Table 7-P (D): Entering Trips Table 7-P (0). Exiting Trips Veh Occ. Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips" Veh.Occ Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips' Office 1 00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Retail 1.00 20 20 1.00 26 26 Restaurant 1.00 19 19 1.00 13 13 Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Residential 1.00 24 24 1.00 13 13 Hotel 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Table 8-P (0): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Destination (To) Origin (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 1 8 1 7 1 Restaurant 0 5 1 2 1 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 1 5 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 Table 8-P (D): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin Destination (To) (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 2 0 0 1 0 Retail 0 6 0 11 0 Restaurant 0 10 0 4 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 1 1 1 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 1 0 0 Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Destination Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode` Internal External Total Vehicles' Transit' Non -Motorized' Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 7 13 20 13 0 0 Restaurant 8 11 19 11 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 9 15 24 15 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 All Other Land Uses' U 0 0 0 10 0 Table 9-P (0): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Origin Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode" Internal External Total Vehicles' Transit' Non -Motorized' Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 13 13 26 13 0 0 Restaurant 7 6 13 6 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 4 9 13 9 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 'Vehicle -trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P 'Person -Trips 'Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator 'Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. I APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 --* --,, -,* 4e '4-- 4% t 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *' r 4 11 tT I tT r Traffic Volume (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 Future Volume (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1556 1734 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 0.23 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1471 1556 1497 433 3466 346 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 7 127 21 10 18 201 1245 16 22 1230 52 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 71 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 48 56 0 33 0 201 1261 0 22 1230 43 Confl. Peds. (Whr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 8.3 8.3 79.7 79.7 87.0 87.0 87.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 10.1 10.1 81.0 81.0 88.3 88.3 88.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 147 142 329 2638 332 2880 1310 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.00 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.46 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.23 0.61 0.48 0.07 0.43 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 45.2 44.6 5.7 4.8 2.7 2.4 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.6 0.3 8.5 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 45.6 45.8 44.9 14.2 5.4 2.7 2.9 1.6 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.8 44.9 6.6 2.8 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations c+ +T+ +Tr 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 113 4 7 158 98 8 0 5 57 0 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 117 0 0 509 515 115 469 468 207 Stage 1 - - - - - - 245 245 - 221 221 - Stage 2 - - - - 264 270 - 248 247 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 - - 1484 - - 478 466 943 508 496 839 Stage - - - - - 763 707 - 786 724 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 746 690 - 760 706 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1484 - 410 439 943 483 467 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 410 439 - 483 467 - Stage 1 - - 723 670 744 720 - Stage 2 - 666 686 716 669 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12 12.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Laneftior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 524 1321 - - 1484 - 647 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.049 - - 0.005 - 0.219 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 7.9 0 - 7.4 0 - 12.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0 - 0.8 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +' r 4 1 TT I tT r Traffic Volume (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 Future Volume (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1557 1738 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.85 0.23 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1460 1557 1507 433 3466 346 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 7 133 21 11 18 212 1243 16 22 1229 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 50 63 0 34 0 212 1259 0 22 1229 47 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 8.6 8.6 79.4 79.4 86.7 86.7 86.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 80.7 80.7 88.0 88.0 88.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 152 147 328 2628 331 2870 1305 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.00 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.49 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.41 0.23 0.65 0.48 0.07 0.43 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 44.9 45.1 44.3 6.1 4.9 2.7 2.5 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.3 9.9 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 Delay (s) 45.4 45.8 44.6 16.0 5.5 2.8 2.9 1.7 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.7 44.6 7.0 2.9 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations cT +T+ +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - - None None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 113 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 126 0 0 548 554 120 511 511 207 Stage 1 - - - - - - 250 250 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - - 298 304 - 256 256 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1473 - 450 443 937 476 469 839 Stage - - - 759 704 - 754 700 - Stage 2 - - - 715 667 - 753 699 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 - 1473 - - 382 412 937 444 436 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 382 412 - 444 436 - Stage 1 - - 719 667 714 687 Stage 2 - - - 630 654 703 662 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.6 12.1 12.6 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 534 1321 - - 1473 618 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.049 - - 0.016 0.23 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.9 0 - 7.5 0 12.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0.1 - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T r 4 0 1 tT r Traffic Volume (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 Future Volume (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1557 1736 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 Fit Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.84 0.21 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1460 1557 1493 406 3466 319 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 7 134 22 10 18 212 1307 16 24 1292 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 50 64 0 34 0 212 1323 0 24 1292 45 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 8.6 8.6 79.4 79.4 86.7 86.7 86.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 10.4 10.4 80.7 80.7 88.0 88.0 88.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 152 145 307 2628 309 2870 1305 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.00 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.02 c0.52 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.42 0.23 0.69 0.50 0.08 0.45 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 44.9 45.2 44.3 6.5 5.0 2.9 2.5 1.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.3 12.8 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 45.4 45.8 44.6 19.3 5.7 3.0 3.0 1.7 Level of Service D D D B A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.7 44.6 7.6 3.0 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +T+ 4 +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 4 7 166 103 8 0 5 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 123 0 0 536 542 121 494 493 218 Stage 1 - - - - - - 259 259 - 232 232 - Stage 2 - - - - 277 283 - 262 261 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1477 - 459 450 936 489 480 827 Stage 1 - - - 750 697 - 775 716 - Stage 2 - - - - - 734 681 - 747 696 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1477 - - 389 422 936 463 450 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 389 422 - 463 450 - Stage 1 - 707 657 - 731 712 - Stage 2 - - - 650 677 - 701 656 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12.4 12.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 502 1306 - 1477 - 629 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.053 0.005 - 0.238 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.9 0 - 7.4 0 12.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue 05/12/2017 --* --W "r*-- IQ 4\ t/W"W 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 1 TT ►j TT r Traffic Volume (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 Future Volume (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1558 1740 1804 3466 1805 3471 1579 At Permitted 0.77 1.00 0.85 0.21 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1450 1558 1504 407 3466 318 3471 1579 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 7 140 22 11 18 223 1305 16 24 1290 59 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 70 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 52 70 0 35 0 223 1321 0 24 1290 49 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 8 4 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% 0% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 79.0 79.0 86.3 86.3 86.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.8 10.8 10.8 80.3 80.3 87.6 87.6 87.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 Clearance Time (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 147 158 152 307 2615 307 2857 1300 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.00 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.04 0.02 c0.55 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.44 0.23 0.73 0.50 0.08 0.45 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 44.5 45.0 44.0 7.1 5.2 3.0 2.6 1.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.7 0.3 15.1 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 Delay (s) 45.1 45.7 44.3 22.2 5.9 3.1 3.2 1.8 Level of Service D D D C A A A A Approach Delay (s) 45.5 44.3 8.2 3.1 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 8.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 106.4 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group Larkin Terrace 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 05/12/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +1� +1� 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 132 0 0 575 581 126 536 536 218 Stage 1 - - - - - - 264 264 - 266 266 - Stage 2 - - - - 311 317 - 270 270 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1466 - 432 428 930 459 454 827 Stage 1 - - - 746 694 - 744 692 - Stage 2 - - - - - 704 658 - 740 690 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 - 1466 - - 363 396 930 426 420 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 363 396 - 426 420 - Stage 1 - - - 703 654 - 702 678 Stage 2 - 615 645 - 688 651 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.6 12.4 13 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1306 1466 - - 601 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.053 0.016 - - 0.25 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.9 0 7.5 0 - 13 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - 0.1 - - 1 Larkin Terrace 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 2 APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM No Build Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB_ 05/12/2017 Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 47 51 53 141 152 120 31 173 137 37 Average Queue (ft) 27 34 33 91 75 51 10 95 61 11 95th Queue (ft) 58 58 68 163 172 145 34 189 154 38 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 0 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 14 28 57 Average Queue (ft) 16 3 8 41 95th Queue (ft) 52 16 28 68 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 i Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM Build Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB 05/12/2017 Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 56 56 163 162 139 25 155 91 23 Average Queue (ft) 25 34 34 103 84 58 12 99 53 6 95th Queue (ft) 63 59 68 193 177 145 37 174 109 25 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 57 18 28 50 Average Queue (ft) 20 5 11 40 95th Queue (ft) 63 23 33 59 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM No Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 60 65 40 163 201 150 31 164 143 38 Average Queue (ft) 36 38 22 113 96 62 15 102 66 12 95th Queue (ft) 76 74 51 181 200 154 40 174 162 41 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 1 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 6 28 54 Average Queue (ft) 16 1 10 37 95th Queue (ft) 53 11 32 64 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 12 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM Build 05/12/2017 Intersection: 1: US-7 & Fayette Rd/McIntosh Avenue Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 80 56 62 178 276 240 31 165 109 33 Average Queue (ft) 43 37 34 129 140 95 12 106 61 15 95th Queue (ft) 87 64 73 236 336 273 37 179 124 41 Link Distance (ft) 201 201 368 494 494 468 468 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 100 190 Storage Blk Time (%) 11 1 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 73 1 1 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 22 33 68 Average Queue (ft) 20 4 14 44 95th Queue (ft) 54 26 40 81 Link Distance (ft) 542 201 182 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 75 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA CRAPIDC 9CAi9 tnevr) i Y.A�u h LOWF➢ HAF11n :;:o:w) = oe WS*Ic slrcfs ANAL O kLCCIkO DRAWING e�10 7 FAYVTF ROAD PUD 0 SOUM 9URUNMN, VT OVERALL SITE PLAN " w a, lm. eMN ana NY v�.m r e eN[wl Fro LI/fA 'uD Mm. vncn W - m. nwcrc��cl. ewvur u.Atksrtr' wwuc oeoa•aa.wn artn .uc. M LlWPQ02 k OIll�llltaf CeeeYll[A(� ]ee. n'i'�' yKb• L PrzeFlkal urecu.r vv..no �owieo° a o �wE 1�990.DWm4 n mvuna L10RLl'M r ei.0 L�W�^"Pimt,.-9v.vvti PUD PARKING SPACES FROM 2013 PARKING STUDY BY LAMOUREUX AND DICKENSON PROPOSED LARKIN TERRACE PARKING SPACES ro 4 55 GARAGE PAKING SPACES f' 10 0 00 10 swa a �[r WAGNER DRAFT LARKIN TERRACE PARKING CHANGES PH&W «. a mob. 7 olle.l"Mo� L 1.0 Oni 1 Summer (joy) Winter (Late December) Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Summer(July) Winter (Late December) Size Unit Space Ratio Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 8-10 pm Peak Weekday 8.10 Peak Saturday 9.10 PM Saturday 8.10 PM 1. Palace 9 aneme 1000 Seats 0.33 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces 330 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 60% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 55% 100% 55% 100% 92% 100% Peak 4 Required Spaces 109 Spaces IM Spaces 1M Spaces 330 Spaces 2H Spaces 330 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace Studio/1 BR Apartments 50 Units 1 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces Hourly 85% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak 4 Required Spaces Al Spaces 43 Spaces 112 Spaces SO Spaces SO Spaces 50 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace 24 BR Apartments 10 Lr' is 2 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces Hp y 85% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak R Required Spaces 1Z Spaces 17 Spaces 12 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 2.2 Larkin Terrace Small Restaurant, Short order 3.25 ksf 12 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 1DO% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 95% 98% 95% 98% 95% Peak 8 Required Spaces 21 Spaces 21 Spaces ;A Spaces 1Z Spaces 38 Spares 1 Spaces 2.3 Larkin Terrace General Retail 17.097 ksf 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces Hourly 95% 95% 80% 40% 65% 50% Monthly 64% puly) 80% (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) Peak a Required Spaces 32 Spaces 0 Spaces 94 Spaces 3fl Spaces 2¢ Spaces 34 Spaces 3. Zen Garden Restaurant (7,128sf) 7.1 "1 18 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces HJ rly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 95% 98% 95% 98% 95% Peak a Required Spaces pg Spaces Spaces M spaces 122 Spaces M Spaces l;j Spaces 4. Artemis Fitness (3,564f) 42 masoc. 0.33 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 spaces 14 Spaces Hourly 90% 90% 80% 80% 30% 30% Monthly 65% 95% 65% 95% 65% 95% Peak 4 Required Spaces jt Spaces lj Spaces Z Spaces 11 Spaces I Spaces 4 Spaces S. Formerly Tilt (2,677 sf) 50 seats 0.5 (tavern) 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% Peak a Required Spaces jg Spares }s Spaces yj Spaces 21 Spaces 21 Spaces 11 Spaces 6. Concentra Urgent Care (9,586 sf medical office) 8.6 ksf 5 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces Hourly 80% 80% 15% 15% 0% 0% Monthly 95% 80% 95% 80% 95% 80% Peak 4 Required Spaces 21 Spares 28 Spaces §, Spaces S Spaces Q Spaces 0 Spaces 7. McDonalds 3.5 nsl 12 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces Hourly 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% 50% Monthly 100% 95% 100% 95% 100% 95% Peak a Required Spaces 71 Spaces 24 Spaces 11 Spaces 12 Spaces U Spaces 12 Spaces S. Citizens Bank 26 ,1 5.8 36 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces Hourly 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak a Required Spaces 11 Spaces a Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Total Number of Required Parking Spaces 443 Spares 603 Spaces 518 Spaces 646 Spaces 621 Spaces 641 Spaces Parking space ratios are based on the Article 13, page 221, of the 2016 South Burlington Land Development Regulation Shared parking adjustment factors are based on Shared Parking, Second Edition , Urban Land Institue, 2005 A I APPENDIX F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION DATA C To Points North 16 Pine St 236 73 32 5 i V Queen city Pk Rd r i 22 J L 162 280 J 'L 1 149 + .- 81 22 r 1 196 7 t 0 ti t r To Points North U57 0 1673 L All Price 't 881 Chopper 109 1189Off-Ramp Plaza r 881 1 t 0 824 US7 1018 1591 J + 1199 On -Ramp 11890n-Ramp t r 678 2538 US7 37 1614 J 1 2 ifi 1 Queen City Pk Rd 8 1 t to s, US 7 181 64 1 1 7 Fayette Kmart 85 0 57 57 1228 22 Plaza J 4 L d L L 65 98 43 J L 18 Side 114 158 7 - r 11 McIntosh Avenue Lowe's, Hannaford, Streets 13 Z r 24 133 7 r 21 Olde Orchard Park, Fayette Rd 1% t r Fayette Rd 1 t r & Palace 9 14 13 213 1243 16 Trip Generation: Enter: 432 Project Site US7 Exit: 409 Turning Movements at Major Intersection Representing Background Traffic To Points North US7 J 1 Price L Chopper r 1189 Off -Ramp Plaza 1 1 1 US 7 3 J4 L 1189 On -Ramp 1189 On -Ramp t r US 7 3 J 1 1 To Points North Pine St t 1 J ; Queen City Pk Rd 1 : L J L 1 L 2 y t 1 US 6 -% 01 ti t r� 3 2 7 Fayette Kmart 3 plaza J 4 1- J 4L 7 L 5 J L 0 J L 5. Side f 2 - 0 - McIntosh Avenue Lowe's, Hannaford, 2 r Streets 9 14 4 7 r Olde Orchard Park, Fayette Rd Fayette Rd `1 t P & Palace 9 7 0 4 10 Percent Diverted: 25% Project Site US 7 Queen City Pk Rd Distribution of New Trips by Background Traffic Existing Land Use ITE LUC Size Enter Exit Total Notes 000 SF 143 149 292 Size from..• - Earth Hannofords 850 39,000 SF 189 181 370 Size from Google Earth Olde Orchard Park 230 210 Units 73 36 109 Size from L&D 12/23/2013 Parking Study Palace 9 Cinema 444 1,000 Seats 27 43 70 Size from L&D 12/23/2013 Parking Study Total 432 409 841 Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) i http://-,-trans.ms2sofi--m/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304033... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30403395 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: PINE ST Road 3: Road 2: QUEEN CITY PK RD Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD « J� »I 1-2of2 AM Peak Hour 06/09/2009 EB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total %7:4541 0 0 15 32 0 1 0 330 20 35 0 551035 0 0 19 32 0 2 0 34 0 23 36 0 59 1121 0 0 25 33 0 4 0 37 0 28 37 0 65 1270 0 0 13 35 0 3 0 38 0 23 23 0 46 97 Total 15 57 0 0 72 132 0 10 0 142 0 94 131 0 225 439 PHF 0.940.68 0.720.94 0.63 0.93 0.84 0.89 0.87 HV % 13 11 1 30 7 1 2 Cars I] Trucks 0 Pedestrians 2 Bikes ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen819;2009 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM m cn a o a N o r'f PINE ST Y 1 Y QUEEN CITY PK RD 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds 8 Bikes W B 131 104 ( .44-94 225 INE � 0 15 o o 72 57 EB 0 �— 0 I 0 0 0 o M 0 Z 1 of 3 5/9/17, 1:57 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) ( http://vtrans.ms2sofy -n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304033... Midday Peak Hour 06/09/2009 EB SB WB m i n o a 15 5 15 0 0 30 3 1] 0 a r o 0 Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Lek Thru Right Ped Total Total :00 1 11 0 0 12 32 0M2034W23 0 30 76:15A5 15 0 020 35 036 0 30 86:303 170020 49 052 0 44 116458210 029 62 072 0 57 158 Total 17 64 0 0 81 178 0 16 0 194 0 61 100 0 161 436 PHF 0.530.76 0.700.72 0.40 0.67 0.66 0.74 0.71 HV % 29 11 1 19 7 0 2 Cars F1 Trucks I Pedestrians n Bikes AM ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen8 9-2009 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM Q ~ I 0 o � oI PINE ST I QUEST! CITY PK RD 0 .".II 10 dor Vehicles 8 Peds 8 Bikes 100 W B 61 161 iPMiI` � 0 64 — V EB 0 �---- 0 I �II' 0 0 0 o �] Z 0 2 of 3 5/9/17, 1:57 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http://vtrans.ms2soft -tn/tcds/peakhour.asp? offset=&dir=&id=304033... PM Peak Hour 06/08/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Ird Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30P 0 0 0 0 :45P 0 0 0 0 :OOP 0 0 0 0 :15P 0 0 0 0 0 6 33 0 0 39 g54 M70 57 0 17 30 0 47 143 0 4 28 0 0 32 63 0 25 43 0 68 163 0 6 44 0 0 50 71 0 18 48 0 66 187 0 6 44 0 0 50 61 0 21 41 0 62 173 Total 0 0 0 0 0 22 149 0 0 171 236 0 16 0 252 0 81 162 0 243 666 PHF 0.920.85 0.860.86 0.57 0.89 0.81 0.84 0.89 HV % 14 2 0 0 4 0 0 Cars 2 Trucks I] Pedestrians ED Bikes ID 30403395: Peak Hr Traffic by Move men8/8/2009 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM m Ln N 00 �D tD M PINE ST �*j t l„' r QUEEN CITY PK RD 0 a li 22 � O 171 149 —► EB 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bikes: 0 f— 0 —� t 0 0 0 o Z . : o 162 4-81 �0 O WB 243 385 3 ol, 3 5/9/17. 1:57 PM Traffic Count -Database System (TCDS) ( http://vtrans.ms2soft !-i/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304142... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30414280 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: QUEEN CITY PK RD Road 3: K-MART ACCESS RD Road 2: QUEEN CITY PK RD EXT Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD « I �1 » 1-2of2 AM Peak Hour 06/09/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped :00 33 0 0 0 :15 25 2 0 0 :30 14 1 0 0 :45 25 0 0 0 33 21 0 431064 0 2 55 0 57 0 0 0 0 27 39 0 376 2 1 51 0 54 0 1 0 0 15 32 0 260 0 2 39 0 41 1 0 1 0 25 15 0 242 1 5 39 0 45 0 0 1 0 Total 97 3 0 0 100107 0 135 0 242 3 10 184 0 197 1 1 2 0 PHF 0.730.38 0.760.69 0.78 0.800.380.50 0.84 0.860.250.25 0.50 W% 7 0 13 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 Cars 2 Trucks 2 Pedestrians 2 Bikes App Int Total Total 0 154 1 158 2 118 1 113 4 543 0.50 ID 30414280: Peak Hr Traffic by Movement/9;2009 8.00 AM to 9:00 AM m N � N R 00 O � � M QUEEN CITY PK RD * Y 8, QUEEN CITY PK RD EXT ;' 0 107 J o =242\/ 0 —� EB 135 All Motor Vehicles 8 Peds 8 Bikes 0 I- C1 M O M O Z r WB C I of, 5/9/17, 2:00 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) / http:/h,,trans.ms2sofL -m/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dii=&id=304142... Midday Peak Hour 06/09/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total Onma ffnWI1m©0O W-r-77"Om0a ffEW-1� 10m©a 27 27 0 36 0 63 0 3 13 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 106 16 19 0 28 0 47 0 6 13 0 19 0 1 2 0 3 85 25 20 1 49 0 70 1 6 25 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 127 31 27 1 39 0 67 0 9 13 0 22 1 1 0 0 2 122 Total 77 20 2 0 99 93 2 152 0 247 1 24 64 0 89 1 2 2 0 5 440 PHF 0.74 0.45 0.25 0.80 0.56 0.50 0.78 0.88 0.25 0.67 0.64 0.70 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.42 HV % 1 0 0 5 50 2 0 4 9 0 0 0 El Cars 0 Trucks 2 Pedestrians 2 Bikes ID 30414280: Peak Hr Traffic by Move men819/2009 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM m to a, QUEEN CITY PK RD * Y QUEEN CITY PK RD EXT 0 All Motor Vehicles 8 Peds & Bikes 2 WB 2 93 o o 247 2 y 5 EB 152 0 I ti N N n M C1 Z 61 2 of 3 5/9/17, 2:00 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) / http://vtrans.ms2soft n/tcds/peakhour.asp? offset=&dir=&id=304142... PM Peak Hour 06/08/2009 NB EB SB WB Start App App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :00 PIV 46 17 0 0 :15 PIV 49 20 0 0 :30 PIV 43 28 0 0 :45 P 43 19 1 0 63 61 3 65 0 129 2M1827jO1 1 0 2 22169 73 7 45 0 125 129 0 0 0 22371 74 7 47 0 128 024 0 0 0 22363 72 5 39 0 116 230 0 0 0 209 Total 181 84 1 0 266 280 22 196 0 498 5 32 73 0 110 0 1 1 0 2 876 PHF 0.92 0.75 0.25 0.94 0.95 0.79 0.75 0.97 0.63 0.80 0.91 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.25 HV% 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 3 5 0 0 1 -1 Cars LI Trucks L' Pedestrians n Bikes 3 of 3 5/9/17, 2:00 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http:/h,trans.ms2softC-nAcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304147... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30414775 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: Road 4: QUEEN CITY PK RD « _,�jJ » 1-6of6 NB SB AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30 2 286 0 0 :45 9 333 0 0 :00 4 319 0 0 :15 5 13MI 0 0 288M36969 307 595 342479 821 323438 761341 366 707 Total 20 1274 0 0 1294 0 1423 167 0 15902884 PHF 0.560.95 0.95 0.88 0.55 0.83 W% 0 6 6 2 M Cars 2 Trucks Z Pedestrians D Bikes ID 30414775: Peak Hr Traffic by Movement 128?2016 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM m to N a �I N t� N � � O US-7 1 1 Lill. g N'A �— 0 187 ,� 0 EB 0 All Motor Vehicles 8 Peds 3 Bikes 'o t'tlo �-� Ole 0 F 0 0 WB K* 1 of 3 5/9/17. 5:04 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http:/h,trans.ms2soft, -n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dii=&id=304147... Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:00 AK1 0 274 0 0 11:15AIA 4 346 0 0 11:30 1 391 0 0 11:45 6 339 0 0 274 0 "3599 268 542 350 0 353 703 392 0 336 728 345 0 368 713 Total 11 1350 0 0 1361 0 1286 39 0 13252686 PHF 0.460.86 0.87 0.90 0.81 0.90 HV % 36 7 8 23 0 Cars 0 Trucks Pedestrians n Bikes ID 30414775: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen8;28;2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM n m 1rf Vl N p M O C� N M � O US-7 l & +� ■ NA 0 0 EB 0 �li wB 2 of 3 5/9/17, 5:04 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http://vtrans.ms2soft-n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=3p4147... NB SB PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :15 P 0 537 0 0 :30 M 1 14411 0 0 :45 PM 2 15171 0 0 :00 PKj 1 14781 0 0 537 0 430 19 0 449 886 442 0 378 8 0 386 828 519 0 413 8 0 421 940 479 0 393 2 0 395 874 Total 4 1973 0 0 1977 0 1614 37 0 16513628 PHF 0.500.92 0.92 0.94 0.49 0.92 HV % 25 3 3 22 0 Cars 1 Trucks Pedestrians 0 Bikes 3 of 3 5/9/17, 5:04 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) / http://vtrans.ms2sofy n/tcds/peakhour.asp? offset=&dir=&id=304147... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30414774 Community: SOUTH BURLINGTON Corridor: Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: Road 4: QUEEN CITY PARK RD I« < j 1 » 1-2 of 2 AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB EB SIB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 7:45 AM 0 376 0 0 376MM 29w 0 403 808 :00 0 361 0 0 36128 0 382 771 :15 0 375 0 0 37526 0 386 787 30 0 411 0 0 411 29 0 343 783 Total 0 1523 0 0 1523 96 0 16 0 112 0 1514 0 0 15143149 PHF 0.93 0.930.89 0.67 0.97 0.94 0.94 H/ % 6 8 19 6 EJ Cars 2 Trucks 0 Pedestrians � Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen812812016 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM m a un O rI O us-7 I & ••• I4'A �- 0 -� ------------- All Motor Vehicles 8 Peds 8 Bikes 0 WEB V -J5 � I•✓ � � O V \Vr� it IF0 \V� 96 112 0 e 0 EB 16 ` 0 -� 1 M N if LM O M T N m lfY Z 1 01,3 5/9/17, 5:03 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) i http:/h-trans.ms2soft--n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dii=&ad=3p4147... Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB EB SB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:00AN 0 341 0 0 11:15AN 0 358 0 0 11:30 AN 0 4031 0 0 11:45 AN 0 3791 0 0 341 19 0 10 0 29 0 293gOO293 663358 27 010 0 37 0 359359 754403 21 0 9 0 30 0 348348 781379 25 0 5 0 30 0 373373 782 Total 0 1481 0 0 1481 92 0 34 0 126 0 1373 0 0 13732980 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 HV % 6 9 6 7 Cars I- Trucks 0 Pedestrians 1-1 Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen8:28:2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM � M V) lJ7 M r` M O � O US-7 * l NA �— 0 All IvInfi_rr 'v'phicles 8 Perk_ Bikes a V.. 92 EK::> 0 EB 34 WB 2 ol" i ;/917. l i I'.1 Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) ` http://vtrans.ms2sofrj -n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304147... r l l PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 NB EB SB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :15 0 613 0 0 :30 N 0 14281 0 0 :45 EM 0 15671 0 0 .00 PM 0 14471 0 0 613 !73 0 2 0 42 0 526 0 0 5261 428 0 1 0 58 0 426 0 0 426 912 567 0 2 0 75 0 411 0 0 4111447 0 3 0 89 0 W4 0 0 384 920 Total 0 2055 0 0 2055256 0 8 0 264 0 1747 0 0 17474066 PHF 0.84 0.840.74 0.67 0.74 0.83 0.83 H/ % 2 2 13 3 Cars 1-1 Trucks Z Pedestrians L7 Bikes ID 30414774: Peak Hr Traffic by Move men8/2712016 4:15 PM to 5:15 PM m U) ti M N US-7 N'A 0 —� I 256 o 264 0 —� EB 8 Z All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bilges ifiF"_ 0 F 0 �0 0 WB �I 3 of 3 5/9/17, 5:03 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) / http://vtrans.ms2soft--n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&:d=3Q4039... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30403906 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: 1-189 WB OFF Road 4: SHOPPING CENTER ENTR « �J » 1-4of4 AM Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SIB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30 0 154 0 JU 154 0 239 1 0 240 293 13 234 0 540 934A55 0 140 0 140 0 270 0 0 270 329 7 240 0 576 986:00 0 194 0 194 0 241 0 0 241 298 3 242 0 543 97815 0 155 0 155 0 273 0 0 273 277 7 236 0 520 948 Total 0 643 0 2 643 0 1023 1 0 10241197 30 952 0 21793846 PHF 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.25 0.94 0.91 0.58 0.98 0.95 HV % 3 7 0 9 20 2 M Cars 2 Trucks 2 Pedestrians 0 Bikes ID 30403906: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen8/28/2016 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM m V N o o u� M N O � � O US-7 *j • 8 • 1-189 WB OFF 0 All Motor Vehicles 8 Peds 8 Bikes 952 WB 31 4-- 30 2179 Imo. • 1197 0nEOMMM o N lft I =0=> 0 o 0 EB 0 ' 0 1 M o ego 0 0 N N M m Z rD 1 of 3 5/9/17, 1:58 PM Tragic C, ount Database System (TCDS) � http://vtrans.ms2sofy m/tcds/peal hour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304039... 1 Midday Peak Hour 06/28/2016 NB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 11:00W7195 11:15 11:30 11:45 153r2311gOO 239 181 M154 324 716165279279 214 384 828183304304 2 00 350 837202353353 2 367 922 Total 7 696 0 8 7030 1174 1 0 1175800 73 552 0 14253303 PHF 0.25 0.89 0.87 0.83 0.25 0.83 0.93 0.87 0.90 0.93 HV% 14 2 7 0 13 1 5 2 Cars RI Trucks 0 Pedestrians M Bikes ID 30403906: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemen8;28;2016 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM m N � � N � � O US-7 r Y g 1-189 WB OFF 552 4— 73 800 0 Eo=> 0 EB 0 WB 1425 K* � _' of 1 �,'9/17_ 1:iS I'M Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http://vtrans.ms2soft n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&i4=3 �4039... C PM Peak Hour 06/27/2016 NB SB WB Start App App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :45 P 0 232 0 0 .00 EM 0 12431 0 1 :15EM 0 11791 0 0 :30 PM 0 11701 0 1 232 0 390 0 0 390 21 24 192 0 426 243 0 407 0 0 407 29130 198 0 436 179 0 419 0 0 419 2 24 255 0 529 112 170 0 457 0 0 457 21 31 236 0 480 110 Total 0 824 0 2 824 0 1673 0 0 1673 881 109 881 0 18714368 PHF 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 HV % 2 1 6 0 3 0 Cars 1-1 Trucks 0 Pedestrians RI Bikes 3 of 3 5/9/17, 1:58 PM Traffic gouni Database System (TCDS) http: /Atrans. ms2 sof , i/teds/peakhour.asp? offset=&dir=&id=304039... Peak Hour Data for Intersection IntID: 30403905 Community: BURLINGTON Corridor: NA Road 1: US-7 Road 3: US-7 Road 2: 1-189 Road 4: 1-189 « JJ » 1-5of5 NB SIB AM Peak Hour 06/12/2014 Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total 30 AN 0 178 248 0 7:45 AN 0 12011313 0 :00 0 199 247 0 :15 0 206 281 0 426 0 368 127 0 495[101112 514 0 448 136 0 584 446 0 499 166 0 665 487 0 384 141 0 525 Total 0 784 1089 0 1873 0 1699 570 0 22694142 PHF 0.95 0.87 0.91 0.85 0.86 0.85 H4% 2 7 4 3 P1 Cars E Trucks -' Pedestrians F Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by Move men8;1212014 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM m V) N N � 00 ti O G! US-7 I-189 0 _♦ 0 0 0 EB � 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bikes 1�. ".. C? �— 0 0 I t I c11 a 00 00 0 c� a� m � � o~o Z WB ! `` 1089 ,,,> I of 3 5/9/17- 1:59 PM Traffic Count Database System (TCDS) http:/h-trans.ms2soft-m/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&1:�=3;W039... r Midday Peak Hour 06/12/2014 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :00 P 0 169 204 0 373 0 334 149 0 483 856 :15 P 0 166 243 0 409 0 350 146 0 496 905 :30 P 0 158 277 0 435 0 339 181 0 520 955 45 P 0 169 277 0 446 0 381 164 0 5451 Total 0 662 1001 0 1663 0 1404 640 0 20443707 PHF 0.98 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.88 0.94 HV% 2 7 6 4 2 Cars 2 Trucks F; Pedestrians n Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by Movemenb 12W14 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM m � V o N N �D tD O O tD e— O &S-7 ; 1 �► 1-189 +— 0 sao 0 0 EB 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bikes J ft o.. +-0 *— 0 O WB 2 <�I 5/9/17. 1:59 PM Traffic Q-)unt'Database System (TCDS) http://vtrans.ms2softr - •n/tcds/peakhour.asp?offset=&dir=&id=304039... PM Peak Hour 06/12/2014 NB SB Start App App Int Time Left Thru Right Ped Total Left Thru Right Ped Total Total :30 P 0 172 370 0 :45 P 0 169 363 0 :00 P 0 175 407 0 :15 P 0 162 398 0 542 0 413 231 0 644 1186 532 0 434 246 0 680 1212 582 0 370 274 0 644 122 560 0 374 267 0 641 1201 Total 0 678 1538 0 2216 0 15911018 0 26094825 PHF 0.97 0.94 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.96 HV % 1 3 3 1 [,� Cars 2 Trucks U Pedestrians M Bikes ID 30403905: Peak Hr Traffic by Move men8i1212014 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM m 's' N pp ti tD O � O Ln � � O US-7 s ■ 1-189 0 1018 0 In � o ' EB 0 All Motor Vehicles & Peds & Bikes - J - 0 0 r 00 00 M ti lf1 6l e- O m N Z N +-0 0 �0 O WB 1538 3 of 3 5/9/17- 1 59 I'M ray From: Dave Wheeler Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 12:22 PM To: ray Subject: Larkin Terrace Ray, The Stormwater Section has reviewed "Larkin Terrace, Final Plat Permit Drawings" prepared by Krebs & Lansing, dated 9/29/16, last revised on 4/14/17. 1. The project proposes to develop/redevelop over 137,486 square feet of impervious surface on the parcel. This will require a stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 2. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of area. It will therefore require a construction stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. Work in the City Right Of Way (ROW) requires a permit before construction can begin. A "Permit to Open Streets or Right -Of -Way" can be obtained from the South Burlington Department of Public Works on their web site, or by stopping by their office located at 104 Landfill Road. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Regards, Dave David P. Wheeler Assistant Stormwater Superintendent Department of Public Works City Of South Burlington 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 658-7961 Ext. 6113 www.sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be retarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. tf you have received this inessage in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. entire PUD including the current proposal so that the Board can determine whether the maximum number of vtes is being exceeded or not. c. Information must be provided with respect to the Traffic Overlay District for the entire project site, which includes the property at 1195 Shelburne Road. d. The Traffic Impact Study must provide the amount of additional traffic created by the removal of the Larkin Terrace complex and the amount of traffic estimated to be generated by the commercial portion of the proposed building in order for the traffic impact fee for the new commercial space to be calculated. e. The Traffic Impact Study must be revised to use Fayette Road as the street name and not Fayette Drive. f. The Landscaping Plan must be revised to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. g. The lighting plan must include the information necessary to meet the requirements of Section 13.07 of the Land Development Regulations. h. An eastern elevation which includes landscaping must be submitted. 10. The final plat submittal must include E911 addresses for the new structure in the proposed project, in conformance with local ordinances and Vermont E911 addressing standards. 11. The final plat submittal must include a plan for affordable housing. 12. Final plans must be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. 13. The final plat application must be submitted within 12 months of this decision. Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Motion carried by a vote of 6— 0 — 0. Signed this 18th day of January 2017, by a Bill Miller, Chair Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Not Present Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See 12 (d): All the commercial uses in the existing PUD are benefitted by a shared parking analysis, which reduces the required parking requirement, and an additional parking waiver. The Board gives preliminary support to this concept, but, because there are several questions related to the shared parking analysis, cannot grant a waiver at this time. H) OTHER ISSUES On some of the plan sheets the applicant shows a sculpture on the northeast corner of the lot and partially outside the property bounds. A condition of this decision will be to show the sculpture within the bounds of the property on all plan sheets. DECISION Motion by Matt Cota, seconded by John Wilking, to approve preliminary plat application #SD-16-29 of John P. Larkin, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations will remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. This project must be completed as shown on the preliminary plat plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The applicant must receive preliminary wastewater allocations prior to final plat approval. 4. The applicant must receive final wastewater allocations prior to issuance of any zoning permits. 5. The Board preliminarily approves the following waivers: a. Front yard setback of twelve (12) feet (a waiver of 18 feet from the standard of 30 feet) b. Front yard coverage of up to 100% (a waiver of 70% from the standard of 30%) 6. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 7. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 8. The applicant will be responsible for regularly maintaining all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on -site. 9. The plans and the TIS must be revised to show the changes below prior to final plat submission: a. The description of the project in the Traffic Impact Study must match the description in the application to the Board. b. The Traffic Impact Study must evaluate the impact of the proposed project with respect to the maximum number of vehicle trip ends (vtes) approved for the PUD, which is 623 vtes, and the study must provide information as to what the trip generation is for the 11 B FJ Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E., AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemart@bfiplanning.com Subject: Review of Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study as revised on May 26, 2017 Date: June 2, 2017 We have reviewed the revised Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact report prepared by RSG dated 5.26.2017, as well as the memorandum prepared by RSG also dated 5.26.201 7 explaining how they addressed the comments that we submitted on April 25. RSG added text to the revised report addressing our comments. They also corrected the number of units that exist on the site from 54 to 61. This yielded a small reduction in new traffic generation. RSG also prepared a level of service and delay analysis for the intersection of Rte 7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue. This performance analysis showed that this intersection will continue to operate at relatively good conditions (overall LOS A, but with the side streets operating at LOS D) and that this project will have an insignificant impact on traffic conditions. We believe that the revised report addresses our comments BFJ also want to remind the City of the shared parking opportunity that exists for this project. The developer should be encouraged to fill the inside garage as much as possible with the residential cars by charging a small monthly fee for inside parking but not assigning any spaces. A certain number of retail employees can then park in the garage during the daytime hours when most residents are gone and an estimated 30 spaces will be vacant. This will decrease the parking load outside and may allow some landbanking of spaces outside. RabideauArchitects May 9, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board c/o City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street , South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-16-29 of John P. Larkin and Eric Farrell Members of the Board, We are pleased to return before you for Final Plat approval of the Larkin Terrace Redevelopment project. The City of South Burlington has asked the applicant to produce an affordable housing plan in order to be considered to have fully completed its final application for 1185 Shelburne Rd. It is this applicant's position that provision of an explicit housing affordability plan is not a requirement of law, and therefore may not be used to delay or deny approval of the project per the "Zoning Administrators Handbook." Nevertheless, the applicant recognizes the good intent of the request and shares in the common interest of developing housing for a wide range of income levels and therefore presents the plan below. The applicant offers that if they (or closely related entities) request bonus density as part of this PUD on lands in which they have ownership (to be defined), then the applicant will retroactively include the currently proposed building. By way of example, if applicant requests a bonus density of 60 units in future phases, 6 of these units will be retroactively included in this first phase, in this way affordable housing units, if included in the project, are distributed throughout multiple phases. This is an innovative project that we hope will act as a catalyst for additional creative development moving forward. The applicant and the design team look forward to a continued collaboration with the City of South Burlington and ask you to vote in favor of this project in general and this proposal in specific. Sincerely, Gregory Rabideau AIA\ 550Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 054M 1902-8663-02221 Rabideau-kchitects.cnm R Additional Considerations: • While the applicant has not formally submitted a Master Plan for future development of the PUD, overtime, there may be lands added to the PUD and/or further development inside the PUD. The timing and scale of future development is difficult to predict and for this reason the current project is contemplated as a "stand-alone." That said, infrastructure (road networks, utilities, etc) has been designed to allow for future contiguous development. • The PUD has, and will continue to have, multiple underlying land owners, some are related entities, and others are not. The applicant cannot make commitments on behalf of other land owners of the PUD. By way of example, the applicant was asked to state that he would never ask for bonus density in future phases. While the applicant currently doesn't see the need for additional density, the applicant cannot say that a member of the PUD will never ask for an affordable housing density bonus. • As a re -development project, this first phase will bear significant costs to demolish existing structures, relocated numerous utilities, provide for current and projected storm water treatment and more. Deferring a more substantial approach to affordability to future phases would allow the applicant to define and absorb such expenses now in exchange for more flexibility moving forward. • We are not asking for a bonus density waiver for the current proposal. The DRB raised the concern that at some point in future phases the applicant would ask for bonus density for affordable units and the inexorable result would be all the affordable units would be clustered in a single building. • At the Preliminary Plat Hearing a member of the DRB raised concerns over the demolition of existing "affordable" housing stock. There was discussion and explanation that the current product was market rate and not specifically part of an affordable housing program. • Scaffolding for affordability: Access to public transit, walk -ability to key services, mixed use development, unit size and energy efficiency are all components of producing housing for a range of incomes. While the market rents for this project have not yet been determined, we believe the above factors will positively impact the cost of living for future residents. • Chapter 3. Limits of Authority: It is this applicant's position that provision of an explicit housing affordability plan is not a requirement of law, and therefore may not be used to delay or deny approval of the project per the "Zoning Administrators Handbook" Third Edition, October 2005 Literal Interpretation.: The Zoning Administrator must literally interpret the zoning bylaws [§4448(a)] and has no discretion to: 0 1. Vary any requirement of duly adopted bylaws; o 2. Make any changes in the terms of the bylaws; or o 3. Grant or refuse a permit for reasons unrelated to the bylaws and not within the • scope of authority delegated by state statute. • Under the Current South Burlington Comprehensive Land Use Regulations, last revised June 27, 2016 the City of South Burlington has only established a requirement for affordable housing in the City Center Form Based Code Districts under article 18, section 18.01A "purpose." That notwithstanding, even if the project were otherwise required to comply 1 with Article 18 of the LDRs, the project would be exempt from the requirement under 18.01 B (2) c, • B. Applicability (2) Exemptions. • The following developments are exempt from these requirements: (c) The redevelopment of existing dwelling units in a project that produces no additional units. • As you know, that is precisely what is proposed for the Larkin Terrace project. To summarize, South Burlington Land Use Regulations do not require affordable housing in the C-1 Auto District, and even if it did, this specific project would be exempt from the requirement, and therefore neither the Development Review Board or City Planning Staff may refuse this permit application on the basis of Affordable Housing. It follows that any discussion and agreement between the City and this Applicant to provide affordable housing would be voluntary, and that the DRB grant the applicant maximum flexibility in seeking to address housing affordability. Conclusion: It is our considered opinion that the City of South Burlington does not have the regulatory authority to mandate affordable housing in the current phase of this project. However, in the spirit of cooperation that has characterized the approval process to date, the applicant has volunteered to accept a provision in the permit that makes sure that if and / or when affordable density bonuses are used within the PUD as a whole, that designated affordable units will be evenly distributed throughout the PUD, including retroactively to the phase now under consideration. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, NIT 054031802 863,0222 1 Rabiceau-Ar6tects_ccm } southhurtin ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- ( I ///2-- (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑Preliminary OFinal PUD Being Requested? ❑✓ Yes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Larking Milot Partnership LLC, 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Marilyn Larkin, 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403, (802)864-7444 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Deborah Sherman, 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 864-7444 a. Contact email address: debsherman@larkingrealty.net 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1105 & 1195 Shelburne Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1540-01185 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com } 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): DEMOLISH (3) EXISTING MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING BUILDINGS W/61 UNITS AND REPLACE WITH A NEW 4 STORY PLUS BASEMENT GARAGE MIXED USE STRUCTURE b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING BUILDINGS WITH 61 UNITS c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 4 STORY PLUS BASEMENT GARAGE MIXED USE STRUCTURE WITH 60 SWELLING UNTIS AND 21,653 GROSS SOFT OF COMMERCIAL SPACE. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 77,618 Gross Square Footage e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 4 STORIES PLUSE BASEMENT GARAGE f. Number of residential units (il'applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 60 UNITS g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): TO BE DETERMINED h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Refer to drawing Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 40.52 b. Building Coverage: Existing 130,258 Proposed 131,636 (acres /sq. ft.) square feet 7.3 % square feet 7.4 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 377,983 square feet 21.3 Proposed 415,151 square feet 23.4 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Parcel D & Farrell East (Parcel A) Existing 5,930 square feet 20.7 Proposed 16,275 square feet 56.9 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) No, it does not encroach into the 50' buffer. c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 142,877 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 8,000,000.00 b. Landscaping: $ 87,970 (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 39 (additional information in traffic report) 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: See traffic report 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: See traffic report 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 15 Months from Commencement 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. 6-b NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 I I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SI ATURE OF APPLICANT ,VV4t®r UV(-U SIGNATURVOF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ray From: Terry Francis Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:11 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Comments on Larkin Terrace Project Ray Nothing to add to the project that hasn't already been reviewed. From: ray Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 11:08 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com>; Terry Francis <tfrancis@sburl.com> Subject: Comments on Larkin Terrace Project Craig & Terry, Any comments on the Larkin Terrace project? Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. /fyou have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Saturn Cutoff LED SACL Series Optics Mounting Light Engine CCT Power Cord Length Finish Voltage Options selux SACL Saturn Cutoff LED R1 R2 R3 5 Type I Type II Type III pe V ry'stribution Distribution Distribution Distribution 1 1A 2 W Single Single Arm Double Wall Mount Mount LG4500 LG4700 LG4105 500 mA/51W 700 mA/65W 35 1050 mA/101W 40 50 'IDA Approved 30' 3000K 3500K 4000K 5000K F or other CCT please consult factory 82,3 102,3 122,3 142,3 162,3 182,3 XX2,3 'For 1 mounting use the pole 8' 10, 12', 14' 16' 18' XX' height 'For 1A or 2 mounting use the pole height +2 WH BK BZ SV SP White Black Bronze Silver Specify Premium Color 120 208 240 277 347* 480* Equipped with step-down transformer DS° HS FS4 PCT DM7.8 DMY5 4Not available with 347 or 480 No Uplight House Side Single Fusing Photocell Dimming Dimming ILG4700 only Finish Shield (180") Tenon (0-IOV) (Dynadim) 120, 240, 277 only See o_ 7 for See o. 7 for 'LG4700, LG4105 only details details HLxxb',e Motion Sensor Hi-Lo w/ optional Photocell Switching (Meets Title 24 Requirements) See P. 5 for See Pole Spec Sheet for Order Cade 1AE .3 IP65 �e1!' UAoE Selux Corporation © 2016,T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without n alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent 'IDA Approved with 3000K CCT PROJECT: LARKIN TERRACE TYPE: WALL MANUFACTURER: SELUX CAT #: SACL-R3-W-LG4500-30-8-FINISH-VOLT-DS Saturn Cutoff LED SACL-I-XX-DS 1A ei " non,.. 1 Specifications 1. Luminaire Cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, designed to ensure optimal thermal management for extra long life time of LED light engine. 2. Gasketing - (not shown) Continuous gasket provides weatherproofing, dust and insect con- trol at all fixture connections. 3. Luminaire Hood - Aluminum shade with white painted interior. 4. LED Array - (not shown) High flux LEDs mounted to PC boards and attached to alumi- num heat sink for maximum LED performance and life. CCT tolerance 1/4 step binning for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and ANSI standard for 5000K. CRI minimum 80 for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and typical 80 for 5000K. Complete light engine can be removed easily for future upgrade. LED light engine provides a reported lumen maintenance of 91% at 60,000 hours. L70 calculated greater than 73,000 hours. 5. LED Driver - LEDs are driven by RoHS com- pliant high -efficiency driver. Excellent for cold temperature starting and instant on. Standard driver for DMY option is Philips Xitanium Driver. 6. Hood Supports - Two aluminum arms support shade and optic assembly and attach to the die cast aluminum pole fitter (shown painted matte black for DS option). m) For further details, please see installation instructions. 7. Pole Fitter - Self -leveling, die-cast low -cop- per aluminum alloy, fitter base secured to pole with three, stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Fitter for 3 1/2" (90mm) O.D. poles. 8. Driver cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, removes for tool -less ac- cess to driver. Driver secured to removable tray for ease of maintenance (shown painted matte black for DS option). 9. Surge Protector - (not shown) Designed to protect luminaire from electrical surge (10kA). 10. Hi-Lo Switching Option - (not shown) Please see p. 5 for details. 11. Power Cord - (not shown) Pre -installed at factory. Please specify power cord length in accordance to height of the pole. Add 2 feet to power cord length if double mounting (2) is specified. Exterior Luminaire Finish - Selux utilizes a high quality Polyester Powder Coating. All Selux luminaires and poles are finished in our Tiger Dryloc certified facility and undergo a five stage intensive pretreatment process where product is thoroughly cleaned, phosphated and sealed. Selux powder coated products provide excellent salt and humidity resistance as well as ultravio- let resistance for color retention. All products are tested in accordance with test specifications for coatings from ASTM and PCI. selux Standard exterior colors are White (WH), Black (BK), Bronze (BZ), and Silver (SV). Selux premium colors (SP) are available, please specify from your Selux color selection guide. 5 Year Limited LED Luminaire Warranty - Selux offers a 5 Year Limited Warranty to the original purchaser that the Saturn Cutoff LED luminaire shall be free from defects in material and workmanship for up to five (5) years from date of shipment. This limited warranty covers the LED driver and LED array when installed and operated according to Selux instructions. For details, see "Selux Terms and Condition of Sale." Listings and Ratings: Luminaire and LED tested to IP65 and IESNA LM-79-08 standards. LED tested to LM-80 standards. Luminaire and LED tested at 25°C ambient temperature. For LG4500 and LG4700, luminaire suitable for ambient temperatures of 55°C (130°F). For LG4105, luminaire suitable for ambient temperature of 45°C (113°F). Minimum op- erating temperature of luminaire at -35°C (-31°F). NRTL Listed (i.e. UL, CSA) Visit selux.us for our LED End of Life recycling policy. Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 2 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 1 E Single Arm Mount (1A) Die-cast aluminum single lumindire mounting arm secured to pole with four stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Outer slip fitter for NA" O.D. tenon. EPA = 2.3ft2 (0.21m2) Weight - 53lbs. (24.Okg) Saturn Cutoff LED Mounting Single (1) Die-cast aluminum fitter base secured to pole with three stainless steel, Allen head set screws. EPA=1.3ft2 (0.12m2) Weight = 39lbs. (17.7kg) 28 "A" (720mm) J Double (2) Die-cast aluminum double luminaire mounting arm secured to pole with four stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Outer slip fitter for 3'A" O.D. tenon. EPA = 4.2ft2 (0.39m2) Weight=176lbs. (79.8kg) O O 72" (1830mm) --— selux Wall (W) Die-cast aluminum double round wall mount arm. Se- cured to wall with 14" diameter threaded fasteners (by others). EPA = 2.lft2 (0.20m2) Weight = 50lbs. (22.7kg) O, 36" (915mm) 32" (813mm) 21 j I— (SSSmm) Wall Arm Mounting Detail (Conduit and mounting hardware by others). 2'A." (65mm) 4 "A," (121mm) -7 9 1/." (235mm) Selux Corporation © 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 3 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right tochange, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at wwwselux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 1 Saturn Cutoff LED Pole Information Refer to pole specification sheets for construction details, anchor- age information and additional options. A35 & S35 S635 Round Straight Aluminum Round Stepped Steel Poles & Round Straight Steel Shown with standard base covers. Pole Data Chart 1m) selux Base Cover Information Refer to pole specification sheets for construction details, anchorage information and additional options. Standard Base Cover(BC5) Supplied with A35 and S35 Two-piece cast aluminum Optional Base Cover (BCi) For A35 and S35 only One-piece cost aluminum Standard Base Cover (BC6) Supplied with S635 One-piece cast aluminum ON' (168� 41A" (118mm) 0151AII (400mm) Bolt Pole Series Circle EPA Information ------ - -- Height Finish Options 70mph 80mph 90mph 100mph 110mph S635 VA" Diameter Stepped Steel Pcle t 091, 57.6 44.3 34.6 27.5 22.8 8 8ft. WH White BK Black BZ Bronze SV Silver SP Specify Premium BC1 Decorative Cast Aluminum Base Cover (for A35 & S35 poles only) REC GFCI Receptacle with weatherproof cover' (120V only) - A35 3'A" Diameter Straight Aluminum Peie 07 s/„ 16.1 12.2 9.4 7.3 5.9 S35 3'/2" Diameter Straight Steel Pole 07 1/4" 14.8 11.3 8.6 6.7 5.4 S635 3 /2" Diameter Stepped Steel Pole 09" 45.6 35.0 27.3 21.6 17.8 10 10 ft. A35 3 Y2" Diameter Straight Aluminum Pole 07 'A" 12.4E28.7 7.1 5.4 4.3 S35 3'h" Diameter Straight Steel Pole s 07 /." 11.4 6.5 4.9 3.9 S635 3'/2" Diameter Stepped Steel Pole 09"ColorA35 37.6 22.3 17.5 14.4 12 12 ft. 3/2" Diameter Straight Aluminum Pole j 07'/4" 9.9 5.4 4.0 3.1 S35 3'A" Diameter Straight Steel Pole 07 3/4" 9.1 6.7 4.9 3.6 2.8 S635 3 V2" Diameter Stepped Steel Pole 09" 31.7 24.2 18.6 14.6 11.9 1414 ft. A35 3 8' Diameter Straight Aluminum Pole 07 3/4" 8.0 5.8 4.2 3.0 2.2 S35 3'A" Diameter Straight Steel Pole 07 3/.' 7.3 5.3 3.8 2.7 1.9 S635 3 /2" Diameter Stepped Steel Pole 09" 21.7 15.8 12.3 9.6 7.6 16 16 ft. A35 3'/2" Diameter Straight Aluminum Pole 07'/4" 4.9 3.2 2.2 1.4 N/A S35 VA" Diameter Straight Steel Pole 07'/4" 4.4 2.8 1.9 N/A N/A Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us - Page 4 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supersede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 s b Saturn Cutoff LED Bolt Circle for A35 & 535 Use caution when setting anchor bolts. Bolts must be vertically straight and centered on dimensions shown 07'/," (197mm) Bolt Circle 7 (197mm) xO O 03" (76mm) Conduit Opening Hand Hold Location Note: Adequate drainage must be provided in concrete foundation. Bolt Circle for 5635 Use caution when setting anchor bolts. Bolts must be vertically straight and centered on dimensions shown. 09" (229mm) Bolt Circle 06'/." (162mm) Conduit Opening Hand Hold Location Note: Adequate drainage must be provided in concrete foundation. 'A"(13mm)J for leveling 10 Galvanized Heavy Hex Leveling Nut Anchor Bolt Detail for S635 Base Cover 1/. x 17" Galvanized Anchor Bolts ,r selux Concrete footing designed and supplied by others 1/. -10 Galvanized Heavy Hex Nut 2', .. -,1 1/" 09mm) ID (70mm) Galvanized Flat Washers r (6mm)- for leveling 1/. - 10 Galvanized Heavy Hex Leveling Nut Concrete footing designed and supplied by others Selux Corporation © 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 5 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Wiring Standard Single Wiring & Dynadim (DMY) L1 FROM LINE N CORD 4) 0-10V Dimming Option (DM) Wiring LG4700 and LG4105, 120-277V. (347V and 480V available with step-down transformer.) FROM LINE CORD L1 N I@ Dim W Dim (-) selux Hi-Lo Switching Option (HL) Wiring LG4700 and LG4105, 120V, 240V, 277V. When red is energized, light output will be at "Lo" level. Specify low level by using one of the 3 levels listed below (i.e. HL70, HL50 and HL33). For other combinations, consult factory. Standard HL levels LG4105 LG4700 HL70 = low output 70% X X HL50 = low output 50% X X HL33 = low output 33% X X FROM LINE CORD L1 N L2 347/480 V SURGE AUTO PROTECTOR TRANSFORMER L1 BLACK FROM WHITE LINE N CORD O GREEN LIGHT ENGINE Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 6 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Optional Accessories Dynadim (DMY) - Please refer to the Dynadim Option Form Single Fusing (FS) - Single inline fuse holder, shipped sepa- (includes a link to the Philips® Design -In Guide) on the Selux rately for infield installation behind hand hole (by others). Saturn Cutoff (..ED webpage under Additional Downloads. Available up to 277V. Photo Cell Tenon (PCT) - Button type photocell mounted No Uplight .Finish (DS) - In order to achieve BUG UO rating, in cast aluminum pole top tenon. Tenon has integral cast the hood support and the driver cover are painted matte visor to prevent false start/stop cycle and can be oriented black to avoid uplight. for optimum performance. Refer to luminaire spec sheet to determine if this option is applicable. 15 'A" (397mm) House Side Shield 'A," (14mm) Front View nm) seLux GFCI Receptacle (REC) - GFCI duplex receptacle with cast base bolted to pole and gasketed, provided with weather-proof, self - closing cover; located 36" (915mm) from base of pole, inline with handhole. Receptacle is intended only for portable tools or other portable equipment to be connected to outlet only when attended by operating personnel (120V only). Side View Street House Side Side Selux Corporation © 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 7 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry Conversion Chart Values based on 16' (4.9 m) mounting height Mounting Height Multiply 10' (3.0 m) 1.27 12' (3.7 m) 1.16 14' (4.3 m) 1.07 16' (4.9 m) 1.00 18' (5.5 m) 0.84 LED CCT Prorate Table Values based on Flux Binning CCT Theoretical Multipliec 3000K 1.00 3500K 0.961 4000K 1.073 5000K 1.115 LED Information Standard Power Electrical Specification (Type V Shown) Color Temerature 5000K 4000K 3500K 3000K Drive Current 1050 700 500 1050 700 li 500 1050 700 500 1050 700 500 Delivered Lumens(Im) R 1 011, 8053 5805 4318 e 7753 5589 4153 ) 6946 y 5007 3724 7223 5207 3873 Wattage (W) 102 68 50 102 68 50 102 68 50 102 68 50 ! Efficacy (Im/W) 79 85 86 1 76 82 84 68 73 74 71 76 78 R1 Optics / 102W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-Rl-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7116 Input Watts: 102.5W Efficacy: 69 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 5587 at 62.5° from vertical. IES classification - Type I Full -Cutoff Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) 62-UO-Gl Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Unk t•; phc4ornetry (PDF) Link to phutornetry 0EF! R2 Optics / 103W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-R2-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7422 Input Watts: 103W Efficacy: 72 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 4799 at 47.5° from vertical. IES classification - Type II Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) B2-UO-Gt Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Lirk to photometry ("DF) Link to photometry (E5j >n Y i k' i i 4--/� e �..WnWa.+Wa wm, selux Selux Corporation O 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 8 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 u Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry R3 Optics / 65W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #:SACL-R3-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7599 Input Watts: 102W Efficacy: 74 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 3709 at 60° from vertical. IES classification - Type III Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) B2-UO-(31 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link to photometry (PLF) Link to photometry (IES) R5 Optics / 65W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-RS-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 103 Input Watts: 67W Efficacy: 79 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 3004 at 60' from vertical. IES classification - Type V Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) B3-UC-Gl Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link to photometry (PDF) Link to Photometry (IFS) - ,4� � y .«m ew«.-»oe.ea, wm «.i+.xe•eo. w,uoi mem •eo n, -v.umi a...,wm,an ��ma jai.: ceo.:amlmAwn u.,. ca.� �w,mw.ci an°i.°,�,°. m,wowne,uai"� aw•i+�s ei,sj �°m',aw�n M :: cai °�' • eo seLUX Selux Corporation 0.2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 9 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the. function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED _ SACL - _ Series SACL Saturn Cutoff LED Optics R1 R2 R3 R5 Type I Type II Type III Type V Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution Mounting 1 1A 2 W Single Single Arm Double Wall Mount Mount Light Engine LG4500 LG4700 LG4105 500 mA/51W 700 mA/65 1050 mA/101W CCT ' 35 40 50 11. 0K 3500K 4000K 5000K. Power Cord 8z3 102,3 122.3 142,3 Length 8' 10, 12' 14' Finish WH BK BZ SV White Bloc Bronze Silver Voltage 120 208 240 277 For other CCT please consult factory 162,3 182,3 XX2,3 16' 18' 1 XX' SP Specify Premium Color 347* 480* •Equipped with step-down transformer Options DS9 HS FS4 PCT DM,' DMY5 No Uplight House Side Single Fusing Photocell Dimming Dimming Finish Shield (180°) Tenon (0-IOV) (Dynodim) See p. 7 for See p. 7 for details details HL6,7,8 j Motion Sensor Hi-Lo w/ optional Photocell Switching 1 (Meets Title 24 Requirements) See P. 5 for i See Pole Spec Sheet for 1 Order Code NRTL t UNION VVE14 IP65 Selux Corporation ® 2016,T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without n alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent 'IDA Approved 'for 1 mounting use the pole height 'For 1A or 2 mounting use the pole height +2 4Not available with 347 or 480 'LG4700 only 1120, 240, 277 only 'LG4700, LG4105 only °HL or DM °IDA Approved with 3000K CCT PROJECT: LARKIN TERRACE TYPE- TWIN MANUFACTURER: SELUX / LUMEC CAT #: SAC L-R5-2-LG4105-3'0-20-FINISH-VOLT- IDS / APR5S-20-B105-COLTX I Saturn Cutoff LED SACL-1-XX-DS 28'A" (720mm) 1 �n Specifications 1. Luminaire Cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, designed to ensure optimal thermal management for extra long life time of LED light engine. 2. Gasketing - (not shown) Continuous gasket provides weatherproofing, dust and insect con- trol at all fixture connections. 3. Luminaire Hood - Aluminum shade with white painted interior. 4. LED Array - (not shown) High flux LEDs mounted to PC boards and attached to alumi- num heat sink for maximum LED performance and life. CCT tolerance 1/4 step binning for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and ANSI standard for 5000K. CRI minimum 80 for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and typical 80 for 5000K. Complete light engine can be removed easily for future upgrade. LED light engine provides a reported lumen maintenance of 91% at 60,000 hours. L70 calculated greater than 73,000 hours. 5. LED Driver - LEDs are driven by RcHS com- pliant high -efficiency driver. Excellent for cold temperature starting and instant on. Standard driver for DMY option is Philips Xitanium Driver 6. Hood Supports - Two aluminum arms support shade and optic assembly and attach to the die cast aluminum pole fitter (shown painted matte black for IDS option). (636mm) j . For further details, please see installation instructions. 7. Pole Fitter - Self -leveling, die-cast low -cop- per aluminum alloy, fitter base secured to pole with three, stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Fitter for 3 1/2" (90mm) O.D. poles. 8. Driver cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, removes for tool -less ac- cess to driver. Driver secured to removable tray for ease of maintenance (shown painted matte black for DS option). 9. Surge Protector - (not shown) Designed to protect luminaire from electrical surge (10kA). 10. Hi-Lo Switching Option - (not shown) Please see p. 5 for details. 11. Power Cord - (not shown) Pre -installed at factory. Please specify power cord length in accordance to height of the pole. Add 2 feet to power cord length if double mounting (2) is specified. Exterior Luminaire Finish - Selux utilizes a high quality Polyester Powder Coating. All Selux luminaires and poles are finished in our Tiger Drylac certified facility and undergo a five stage intensive pretreatment process where product is thoroughly cleaned, phosphated and sealed. Selux powder coated products provide excellent salt and humidity resistance as well as ultravio- let resistance for color retention. All products are tested in accordance with test specifications for coatings from ASTM and PCI. selux Standard exterior colors are White (WH), Black (BK), Bronze (BZ), and Silver (SV). Selux premium colors (SP) are available, please specify from your Selux color selection guide. 5 Year Limited LED Luminaire Warranty - Selux offers a 5 Year Limited Warranty to the original purchaser that the Saturn Cutoff LED luminaire shall be free from defects in material and workmanship for up to five (5) years from date of shipment. This limited warranty covers the LED driver and LED array when installed and operated according to Selux instructions. For details, see "Selux Terms and Condition of Sale." Listings and Ratings: Luminaire and LED tested to IP65 and IESNA LM-79-08 standards. LED tested to LM-80 standards. Luminaire and LED tested at 25*C ambient temperature. For LG4500 and LG4700, Luminaire suitable for ambient temperatures of 55°C (130°F). For LG4105, luminaire suitable for ambient temperature of 45°C (113'F). Minimum op- erating temperature of luminaire at -35°C (-31-F). NRTL Listed (i.e. UL, CSA) Visit selux.us for our LED End of Life recycling policy. Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 2 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the :`unction of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Mounting Single (1) Single Arm Mount (1A) Double (2) Die-cast aluminum fitter base Die-cast aluminum single luminaire Die-cast aluminum double luminaire secured to pole with three stainless mounting arm secured to pole with mounting arm secured to pole with steel, Allen head set screws. four stainless steel, Allen head set four stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Outer slip fitter for TA" screws. Outer slip fitter for 31A" O.D. O.D. tenon. tenon. EPA=1.3ft2 (0.12m2) EPA = 2.3ft2 (0.21m2) EPA = 4.2ft' (0.39m2) Weight = 39lbs. (17.7kg) Weight - 53lbs. (24.Okg) Weight = 176lbs. (79.8kg) 0 T 0� 0� - 28 Y." 36" 72" (720mm) (915mm) (1830mm) selux Wall (W) Die-cast aluminum double round wall mount arm. Se- cured to wall with'/." diameter threaded fasteners (by others). EPA = 2.1ft2 (0.20m2) Weight = 50lbs. (22.7kg) Wall Arm Mounting Detail (Conduit and mounting hardware by others). 4 "A." (121mm) O O 5"A." O 9y.. (151mm) (235mm) O O 2 'A.' (65mm) Selux Corporation © 2016,T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. Page 3 of 9 (Rev.12/2016) SACL_SSv3.5 E Saturn Cutoff LED Wiring Standard Single Wiring & Dynadim (DMY) L1 FROM LINE N CORD 0-10V Dimming Option (DM) Wiring LG4700 and L64105, 120-277V. (347V and 480V available with step-down transformer.) FROM LINE CORD L1 N Dim W Dim (-) seLux Hi-Lo Switching Option (HL) Wiring LG4700 and LG4105, 120V, 240V, 277V. When red is energized, light output will be at "Lo" level. Specify low level by using one of the 3 levels listed below (i.e. HL70, HL50 and HL33). For other combinations, consult factory. Standard HL levels LG4105 LG4700 HL70 = low output 70% X X HL50 = low output 50% X X HL33 = low output 33% X X FROM LINE CORD L1 N L2 347/480 V L1 BLACK FROM WHITE LINE N CORD ® GREEN SURGE AUTO PROTECTOR TRANSFORMER LIGHT ENGINE Selux Corporation 0 2016, T 645-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 6 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or moterials that in our opinion will nct (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 C Saturn Cutoff LED Optional Accessories selux Dynadim (DMY) - Please refer to the Dynadim Option Form Single Fusing (FS) - Single inline fuse holder, shipped sepa- (includes a link to the Philips® Design -In Guide) on the Selux rately for infield installation behind hand hole (by others). Saturn Cutoff LED webpage under Additional Downloads. Available up to 277V. Photo Cell Tenon (PCT) - Button type photocell mounted in cast aluminum pole top tenon. Tenon has integral cast visor to prevent false start/stop cycle and can be oriented for optimum performance. Refer to luminaire spec sheet to determine if this option is applicable. is (39i House Side Shield .A.' (14mm) Front View nm) mm) No Uplight Finish (DS) - In order to achieve BUG UO rating, the hood support and the driver cover are painted matte black to avoid uplight. GFCI Receptacle (REC) - GFCI duplex receptacle with cast base bolted to pole and gasketed, provided with weather-proof, self - closing cover; located 36" (915mm) from base of pole, inline with handhole. Receptacle is intended only for portable tools or other portable equipment to be connected to outlet only when attended by operating personnel (120V only). 21°/,." (71mm) 4/' (117mI m) L Side View Street House Side Side Selux Corporation Q 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 7 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supersede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry Conversion Chart Values based on 16' (4.9 m) mounting height Mounting Height Multiply 10' (3.0 m) 1.27 12' (3.7 m) 1.16 14' (4.3 m) 1.07 16' (4.9 m) 1.00 18' (5.5 m) 0.84 LED CCT Prorate Table Values based on Flux Binning CCT Theoretical Multiplier 3000K 1.00 3500K 0.961 4000K 1.073 5000K 1.115 LED Information Standard Power Electrical Specification (Type V Shown) Color Temerature - - - SOOOK 4000K 3500K 3000K Drive Current 050 700 500 1050 700 500 1050 700 500 1050 700 500 Performance Delivered Lumens (Im) 8053 5805 1 4318 775 1 5589 4153 6946 5007 3724 7223 5207 3873 Wattage (W) 102 68 50 102i 68 50 102 68 50 102 68 50 Efficacy (Im/W) 79 85 86 76 1 82 1 84 68 73 74 1 71 1 76 1 78 R1 Optics / 102W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-RI-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7116 Input Watts: 102.5W Efficacy: 69 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 5587 at 62.5° from vertical. IES classification - Type I Full -Cutoff Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) 132-1-10-G1 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% L.inle to phctornetry (PDF) Un.k to photorneuy (IES! R2 Optics / 103W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-R2-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7422 Input Watts: 103W Efficacy: 72 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 4799 at 47.5' from vertical. IES classification - Type II Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) 132-1-10-Gt Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link ,a photometry (DF) Link to photometry ;IES) .tM loo ww •ex.5. w:dueiu:pe-Se 4 t .Vatlfil Pi.nmi ITwpn nomm�Y wglw Ie15 � 2N.51It1:�W 4a CC.1 , \ W'4 ', \""X� xl venwa Pr:.�n:ww Nmrol.i n,�e.1.5. sxnlm:.:ren w.ce.l 5 v.�, e.ee oP �e Pao�lm.:n,y wae� selux Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 8 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SAC1__SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry R3 Optics / 65W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #:SACL-R3-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7599 Input Watts: 102W Efficacy: 74 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 3709 at 60° from vertical. IES classification - Type III Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) 82-UO-Gl Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link to photornetry (F'DF) Link to photometry ;'IES) R5 Optics / 65W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-R5-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 103 Input Watts: 67W Efficacy: 79 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 3004 at 60° from vertical. IES classification - Type V Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) B3-UO-G1 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link to photornetry (PDFI link to photorne ry (IES) r+.em«m c,m�,•ana.w. �«. man«w•,as w�um.,yb •ao « aus.w,wo„ selux Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 9 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found of www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supersede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Base & Bolts Information I 3" (76mm) Projection Comes with 4 steel anchor bolts, 3/ ' X 24" + 3" J Type Bolts, 8 nuts and 8 washers. Important: Do not obstruct space between anchor plate and Anchor Plate Free opening 4 1/2-0 -Bolt Circle: 114mm 12 1/2" (318mm) Material: Cast Aluminum + � NOTE: , Bolt Circle Allowed: �-- 9 1 /4" to 12 3/4" 234mm to 324mm 292mm Qty 1 Pole APR5S-20-B105-COLTX Description of Components: Pole Shaft: Shall be made from a 5" (127mm) round extruded 6061-T6 aluminum tubing, having a 0.219" (5.6mm) wall thickness, welded to both the bottom and top of the anchor plate. Maintenance Opening: The pole shall have a 2" x 4 1/2" (51mm x 114mm) maintenance opening centered 20" (508mm) from the bottom of the anchor plate, complete with a weatherproof aluminum cover and a copper ground lug. Base Cover: Two piece round base cover made from cast 356 aluminum, mechanically fastened with stainless steel screws. Note: A tenon will be provided when the luminaire or bracket does not fit directly on pole shaft. Tenon not shown on the drawing. IMPORTANT: Philips Lumec strongly recommends the installation of the complete lighting assembly with all of its accessories upon the anchoring of the pole. This will ensure that the structural integrity of the product is maintained throughout its lifetime. Pole Weight: 76 Ibs (34.5 kg) S P E C20170120_000049_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 1/2 Miscellaneous Description of Components: Hardware: All exposed screws shall be complete with Ceramic primer -seal basecoat to reduce seizing of the parts and offers a high resistance to corrosion. All seals and sealing devices are made and/or lined with EPDM and/or silicone and/or rubber. Finish: Textured color to be advised (Product Standard Color only): (COLTX) and in accordance with the AAMA 2603 standard. Application of polyester powder coat paint (4 mils/100 microns) with ± 1 mils/24 microns of tolerance. The Thermosetting resins provides a discoloration resistant finish in accordance with the ASTM D2244 standard, as well as luster retention in keeping with the ASTM D523 standard and humidity proof in accordance with the ASTM D2247 standard. The surface treatment achieves a minimum of 2000 hours for salt spray resistant finish in accordance with testing performed and per ASTM 13117 standard. Note: IMPORTANT. All missing details must be clearly specified on the return of these approval drawings. Thank you for your cooperation. COLOR: Quality Control: The manufacturer must provide a written confirmation of its ISO 9001-2008 and ISO 14001-2004 International Quality Standards Certification. Vibration Resistance: Aluminum poles are not recommended in high vibration environments such as bridge, overpass, top of building, airport, train station, etc. Web site information details: / ISO 9001-2008 Certification / ISO 14001-2004 Certification / CSA Pole Certification SPEC20170120_000049_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 2/2 MW 20 1 % g 511mmo 17 3 / 4"0 451 rnmO LEDGINE EPA: 1.962 sq ft / weight: 31.08 lb (14.1 kg) Note: 3D image may not represent color or option selected. Logos above include link, click to access. Qty 1 Luminaire MPTR-35W32LED4K-T-LE3W-VOLT-PH8-COLTX Description of Components: Finial: Decorative cast 356 aluminum, mechanically assembled Hood: Made of die cast A360.1 Aluminum alloy 0.100 (2.5mm) minimum thickness, mechanically assembled to the cast aluminum heat sink. Guard: In a round shape with 4 arms and a built-in mechanical ring, this guard is a one piece die cast A360 Aluminum alloy 0.100 (2.5mm) minimum thickness, mechanically assembled to the fitter. Access -Mechanism: A die cast A360.1 Aluminum alloy 0.100 (2.5mm) minimum thickness technical ring with latch and hinge. Heat Sink: Made of cast aluminum optimising the LEDs efficiency and life. Product does not use any cooling device with moving parts (only passive cooling device). LED Module: LED type Philips Lumileds LUXEON T. Composed of 32 high-performance white LEDs. Color temperature as per ANSI/NEMA bin Neutral White, 4000 Kelvin4wmiaal_.39851< +/- 275K or 371 OK to 4260K), CRI 70 Min. 75 Typical. Optical System: (LE3W), IES type III (asymmetrical), wide. Composed of high-performance optical polymer refractor lenses to achieve desired distribution optimized to get maximum spacing, target lumens and a superior lighting uniformity. System is rated IP66. Performance shall be tested per LM-63, LM-79 and TM-15 (IESNA) certifying its photometric performance. Street side indicated.Dark Sky compliant with 0% uplight and UO per IESNA TM-15. Driver: High power factor of 90% minimum. Electronic driver, operating range 50/60 Hz. Auto -adjusting universal voltage input from 120 to 277 VAC rated for both application line to line or line to neutral, Class I, THD of 20% max. Maximum ambient operating temperature from-40F(-40C) to 130F(55C) degrees. Assembled on a unitized removable tray with Tyco quick disconnect plug resisting to 221 F(105C) degrees. Driver comes with dimming compatible 0-10 volts. SPEC20170120_003749_10361_0 01-20-2017 Page 1 /6 PROJECT: LARKIN TERRACE TYPE: STREET MANUFACTURER: LUM`EC CAT #: MPTR-35W32LED3K-T-L'E3W-VOLT-PH8- COLTX / RA61 F-13-COLTX The current supplying the LEDs will be reduced by the driver if the driver experiences internal overheating as a protection to the LEDs and the electrical components. Output is protected from short circuits, voltage overload and current overload. Automatic recovery after correction. Standard built-in driver surge protection of 2.5kV (min). Surge Protector: Surge protector tested in accordance with ANSI/IEEE C62.45 per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2 Scenario I Category C High Exposure 10kV/10kA waveforms for Line -Ground, Line -Neutral and Neutral -Ground, and in accordance with U.S. DOE (Department of Energy) MSSLC (Municipal Solid -State Street Lighting Consortium) model specification for LED roadway luminaires electrical immunity requirements for High Test Level 10kV / 10kA. Fitter: Made of die cast A360.1 Aluminum alloy 0.100 (2.5mm) minimum thickness, the fitter is complete with a watertight access door giving access to the driver rated IP66, and a terminal block that accepts (#2 max.) wires from the primary circuit. Comes with an easy self adjusting system with two (2) set screws 3/8 16 UNC for ease of maintenance and installation. Fits on a 4"(102mm) outside diameter by 4"(102mm) long tenon. Luminaire Options: PH8, Photoelectric Cell, Twist -lock Type c/w receptacle with 5 pins allowing dimming. SP EC20170120_003749_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 2/6 Base & Bolts Information II 3"(76mm) Projection 11 Comes with 4 steel anchor bolts, 3/ ' X 17" + 3" J Type Bolts, 8 nuts and 8 washers. Important: Do not obstruct space between anchor plate and Anchor Plate Free opening a 1/3-0 -Bolt Circle: 206mm 12 1/2" (318mm) Material: Cast Aluminum t NOTE: ` Bolt Circle Allowed: 11" to 13" 279mm to 330mm 13„� 330mm Qty 1 Pole RA61 F-13-COLTX Description of Components: Pole Shaft: Shall be made from a 4" (102mm) round extruded 6061-T6 aluminum tubing, having a 0.125" (3.2mm) wall thickness, welded to the pole base. Joint Cover: Two-piece round joint cover made from cast 356 aluminum, mechanically fastened with stainless steel screws. Pole Base: Shall be made from a 8 5/8" (219mm) round extruded 6061-T6 aluminum tubing base having a 0.148" (4.8mm) wall thickness, welded to both the bottom and top of the anchor plate. Maintenance Opening: The pole shall have a 4 1/2" x 10" (114mm x 254mm) maintenance opening centered 25 1/4" (641mm) from the bottom of the anchor plate, complete with a weatherproof embossed aluminum cover and a copper ground lug. Base Cover: Two piece round base cover made from cast 356 aluminum, mechanically fastened with stainless steel screws. Note: A tenon will be provided when the luminaire or bracket does not fit directly on pole shaft. Tenon not shown on the drawing. IMPORTANT: Philips Lumec strongly recommends the installation of the complete lighting assembly with all of its accessories upon the anchoring of the pole. This will ensure that the structural integrity of the product is maintained throughout its lifetime. Pole Weight: 31 Ibs (14.1 kg) SPEC20170120_003749_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 3/6 I I! Miscellaneous Description of Components: Wiring: The connection of the luminaire is done using a terminal block connector 600V, 85A for use with bare son (#2 max.) wires from the primary circuit, located inside the fitter. Hardware: All exposed screws shall be complete with Ceramic primer -seal basecoat to reduce seizing of the parts and offers a high resistance to corrosion. All seals and sealing devices are made and/or lined with EPDM and/or silicone and/or rubber. Finish: Textured color to be advised (Product Standard Color only): (COLTX) and in accordance with the AAMA 2603 standard. Application of polyester powder coat paint (4 mils/100 microns) with ± 1 mils/24 microns of tolerance. The Thermosetting resins provides a discoloration resistant finish in accordance with the ASTM D2244 standard, as well as luster retention in keeping with the ASTM D523 standard and humidity proof in accordance with the ASTM D2247 standard. The surface treatment achieves a minimum of 2000 hours for salt spray resistant finish in accordance with testing performed and per ASTM B117 standard. Note: IMPORTANT: All missing details must be clearly specified on the return of these approval drawings. Thank you for your cooperation. COLOR: / VOLTAGE: LED products manufacturing standard: The electronic components sensitive to electrostatic discharge (ESD) such as light emitting diodes (LEDs) are assembled in compliance with IEC61340-5-1 and ANSI/ESD S20.20 standards so as to eliminate ESD events that could decrease the useful life of the product. Quality Control: The manufacturer must provide a written confirmation of its ISO 9001-2008 and ISO 14001-2004 International Quality Standards Certification. Vibration Resistance: The MPTR meets the ANSI C136.31, American National Standard for Roadway Luminaire Vibration specifications for Bridge/overpass applications. (Tested for 3G over 100 000 cycles) Aluminum poles are not recommended in high vibration environments such as bridge, overpass, top of building, airport, train station, etc. Web site information details: Click on any specific information details you need: Paint finish / Warranties / Installation pictures / ISO 9001-2008 Certification / ISO 14001-2004 Certification / cULus Certification / CSA Pole Certification S P E C20170120_003749_10361 _0 PHILIPS 01-20-2017 Page 4/6 LUMEC LED light engine technical information for MPTC and MPTR LED = Milips Lurnileds LuxeOn T, CIFU = 70, CCT = 4OWK (+/- 150K) Sy"I rn ftED -d fiver ) rared !ife - !MrXX) hff 11;1�0 OW hrs; Lim Madt" Typical dcWeted lumens Typical '5yvg�t"3 Typical "frentO 120V(A) I ypical Typical cuttentCa current ?08V(A) 240V(A) I ypical cunenxtb 277V(A) LEn current (mA) HFU Luminaire Efficacy Rating "-MOW) 8M rang 16W16LED4K-T-LF.3 16W16.LE04K-T-LE2 1691 1704 20 21D 0,17 0,17 C 11, 0.10 011 0,10 0,09 009 350 350 50-70 50-70 84 1$ 952 W-E a -Go a i-UOGo 16W16LEO".-T-LE3W 1704 20 0,17 011 GAG 0-09 350 50-70 95,2 BC,-U,-,-GIi 16W1fiLE04X-T-LE4 1704 20 0.17 0..11 0'.1c 0.09 350 50-70 95.2 BOA)O-Go 16WALENK-T-LE5 17N 20 0-17 0.11 0- 10, 0-09 350 50-70 95-2 81-LIO-GO 24'A16LED4K-T-tE2 2363 219 0.25 G.IS 0.13 0A2 53C 70-IM 91-5 151-UO-GI 2'4MELE04K-T-LE3 2363 215 U5 0-15 0,13 0-12 55C 7D-100 82S 51-UO-GI 24'A16LED4X-T-1E3W 2.363 419 C 25 0,15 i 0,13 0,12 530 70-100 81-5 1 82-uQ-(;1 24W16LED4K-T-LE4 2363 29 025 0,15 0,13 0,12 1 530 70-100 81's 81-UO-G1 24W115LE04X-T-LE5 2353 29 025 015 013 012 530 70-100 81,5 82.L*-GI 3OW16LE04K-T-LE3 2979 38 C 32 019 017 01.5 700 70-100 78.4 51-UO-Gl 30W16LE04K-T-LE2 M 38 C 32 019 0-17 015 700 7D-100 78.9 BIAXQGl 3OW16LENK-T-LE3W 3000 33 1 032 0-19 O- 17 OAS 700 70-100 73-9 81-UG-Gl 3CW16LED4K-T-LE4 3000 38 0.32 019 0-17 OAS 700 70-100 7&9 B1-UG-G1 3OW16LE04K-T-LE5 31 �, 38 0 32 C,19 017 0J5 700 70-100 78-9 82-UG-GI ,35W32LED4K-TAU 3313 31 0,31 0,19 017 016 350 70-100 89,7 52-UO-G1 35W321E04K-T-LE3W 3318 37 031 019 017 016 350 70-100 89.7 52-UO-GI 35W32LED4K-T-LE4 3313 37 C 31 019 C1, 016 35C 70-ICO 89,7 51-UO-Gi 35W321ED4K-T-tE5 3318 37 031 0,19 0,17 0,16 350 70-100 M 7 82-UO-Gl 35W32LEM-T-LE3 3318 37 0.31 0.19 0.17 0.16 350 7,'•- 100 89.7 81-UO-Gl 48'.V16LED"-T-LE3 A036 55 0A7 0-26 013 0-20 1 1050 7D-ICIO 73A 81-UD-Gl 48W16LEO"-T-tE2 -LU68 55 0-47 0.26 0-23 0-20 1050 70-ICO 74.0 81-UO-Gl 48W16LE4D4K-T-tC$ 068 1 S5 0.47 0,26 0123 0.20 1050 70-100 740 61-UO-G1 48W16LED4K-T-LE4 -v15F 56 0,47 O- 25 0123 0120 1050 70-100 7= C 81-UG-GI, 48W16LED4K-T-LE'5 -n�F�Q 55 0.47 026 0'.23 0,20 1011v 70-IW 7,: 0 B3-UC-GI 55W32LED4K-T-LE2 4W2 55 CA" 0.27 014 0,22 530 IOG-150 937 81-UG-Gl 55WMENK-T-M 4602 55 0.47 0-27 0.24 0.22 530 1 i00-i30 93.7 81-UO-Gi 55W32tED4K-T-LE3W 4602 55 0-47 0-27 0.24 0.22 530 100-150 83.7 81-UO-Gl 55W321F-O"-T-LE4 4602 55 C, 0.27 0-24 0.22 530 100-150 83-7 61-UC-GI SSWMENK-T-LES 4602 55 0,41 0-27 0,24 0-22 530 100-150 83-7 513-UO-Gl. 55W49LED4K7T-LE3 4946 55 0,46 0,215 0 26 0,24 350 1150-150 99.9 B1-UO-Gl 55W48LE04K-T-LE2 4954 55 046 078 0.16 1 0,24 350 IW-150 90,1 B1-UO-G1 55W46LED4K-T-LE3W Z954 55 045 029 026 024 BC 100-150 W I 51-UG-Gi 55W48LE04K-T-LE4 .1 9 51" 55 0,45 0,28 0.26 0.24 350 100.15C 9C 1 B1-U0-G1 55W491EG4K-T-LE5 4954 SS OA6 0-28 016 014 350 1DO-150 K 1 83-UO-G1 72W32LEI)4K-T-LE2 sw 73 0-62 0-36 0.31 0-28 700 ix-130 KO B1-UO-G1 72W32L1EO41G-T-LE3W 59AD 73 0-62 0-16 1 ul 0-28 700 Itc-130 SC-0 sl-U()-C-2 7ZW32.LE04K-T-LE-4 $840 73 0±16 �356 0.313 1 0-28 70C im-15C, 80,0 B1-UO-G1 '72W32LE04K-T-LE5 11 sw 73 0,615 1 3515 0-313 1 0-29 7,00 53-UQ-G1 72W32LED4K-T-LE3 1 5844 73 0615 0356 0313 1 110EJ n 51-UO-GI L70=100,000Bari latenbier.ttemperature =2S'C and for-*ard current =7-OOMA) 'L70=90,=hr-. at arrbienter^pasture = ZS'C ard forward curTert = ICSO MA) a lamp ardth* LED driver. 'Equivalance st,*Od alwaysbAa confirmad by a phommetric lay nct McKv Dt*tqrap Warsd ccnc suwas a4vmczs in LED technolo%AEUturninaffe data is subject to cKarigewiO.or4 nxic* and at the discretion oi Philips: SPEC20170120 - 003749 - 103610 01-20-2017 Page 5/6 PHILIPS LUMEC LED light engine technical information for MPTC and MFTR LED - Philips Lumileds Luxem T. CRI -- 70, CT - 4000K (-/- 350K) Sv5zem (LED - drim) rated fife . 10i). W hrs' t 90,At100 his Module 70W6E04K-T-LE2 Typical 4ehvewed 6624 ea TqpilTypical twIl 73 Aou0stv,n�k 0 V0V() 0-60-0 Typical E I 28 0362 Typical Typical cuFFA0 ctret 0CMM 240V(Al 277V(Al 0-3.22 0-192 I'M 150 tg*: Z' 100-150 Moacy M) 903 UG e , H 81-W-Gi 70W64LED4K-T-LE3 662-1 73 0-6009 C-362 0322 0-292 350 IM-150 90-7 81-UG-C-2 70MkE04X-T-LE3W 66214 73 0-609 0-362 0-322 0-292 350 100-15t 90.7 Bl-UO-G2 7OW64LED4X-T-LE4 6624 73 0,609 0,362 0.322 1292 3% IDO-150 90-7 Bl-UG-G21 7UWfi--'LE04K-T-LE5 6624 73 0,1509 0-362 O.M 0292 350 200-15D 90.7 B3-U0-G2 BOW48LED4.K-T-LE3 6859 82 0168 040 035 0.319 530 150-200 843 51-UO-G2 BOW48LE04K-T-LE2 6963 91 058 040 0,35 0,319 530 150-20D E9 7 51-UO-GI 80W48LE04K-7-LE3W 6963 81 0,68 Odo 0,35 0319 53C 150-21 94.7 01-UO-G2 3DW49LED4K-T-LE4 6963 31 0-68 0,40 0,35 0-319 530 150-200 34.7 B1-UO-G2 MW49LENK-T-LE5 6863 al 0-675 6.399 0.353 0.315 530 150-20C 84-7 83-UO-G,21 97W321ED4K-T-LE3 7915 i M 0-92 0553 OAM 0-41-L 1.050 150-wo 72-0 61-UO-G, 97W32LED4K-T-LE2 7920 110 1 0.92 0-533 0,4" 0-414 1050 15C-200 722-0 82-UG-Gl 97W32LCB4K-T-LC3W 71WO 110 0-92 0-533 OAS 0,414 1050 150-2w 740 51-uO-G2 97W32LED4K-T-LEd 792n 110 092 0533 0,469 0,414 1050 150-2ce '72-0 61-UO-G2 97W32LED4K-T-LE5 7920 110 C- 91. 0533 0,468 0.414 low 150-200 72,0 53-U()-G2 9OW$CLED4K-TAE2 A GIC4 86 0726 0,4219 0,382 0,347 350 150-200 95,4 52-W-G11 90W8GLE04K-T-LE3 &M4 96 0,726 0-429 1382 0-347 350 ISO -fib 95A 81-UD,G2 MWK,LE0AK-T-LE3W &ZO4 86 1 0-726 0,129 1 0-382 0.347 aw 150-200 95A 82-UO-G2 901MCLEO-K-T-LE-4, 86 0726 0-425 0.382 0.347 3w 150-= 95"A Bl-U0-G.2 9OW80LE04K-T-LE5 T2104 36 0726 0-429 0.382 0.347 350 150-2w 95.4 83-UO-G2 1O8W48LED4-K-T-LF2 S71 5 107 0,996 0-519 0.457 0.407 700 200-250 81A B2-L)G-G2 J0E'W4-6LZD4K-T-LE3W 8715 207 0.896 01519 0.457 0.407 700 ZW-250 81A 52-UG-G21 1GZW4RLZD4K-T-LE4 9711-155 107 0896 0,519 0A57 0AU7 700 200-250 81.4 Sl-UO-G2 IMM-LBLENK-T-US 9715 107 OM6 0319 OA57 0,407 7W 200-250 814 B3-L*-G2 108W48LED4K-T-LE3 9713 1,07 0,996 0-519 0,457 0.407 700 1100-250 91-5 B1-W-G2 11DW64LED4K-T.1 E3 9167 105 0179 0512 0-449 0-4 530 200-2w 873 B2-UO-G2 11CW64LE04K-T-LE2 9169 105 0-975 0-512 0.449 OA 530 200-250 97.3 82-U0-G2. 11CIA(641 FDAK-T-LE3W 9169 105 0-973 0-512 0-449 0-4 530 2OC-250 973 82-uo-r.21 11OW64LED"-T-LF4 9169 105 0.879 0-512 1 0-449 0-4 1 530 2X-M 83.3 B2-UO-G2 110W64LEOU-T-LES 91151 105 1 O'M 0-512 0.449 CA 530 200-250 873 B3-u0-G2 135W3OLEU-'K-T-LE2 135W3OLED4K-T-LE3 11323 11362 132 132 1,105 1,105 0639 0,639 0,561 0.499 01561 OASIS 530 530 250-3.10 250-320 95.7 9511 B2-u0-G2 52-uO-G2 135WBOLENK-T-LE4 11362 1,32 1.105 0,631 0-%1 0,498 M 250-3213 96,1 82-UO-G2 135W50tFD4X-T-LE3W 11769 152 1-1105 0-639 CLS61 0.498 530 250-3rG R91 B2-UG-G21 14OW49LED4K-T-LE3 11803 162 1-355 0-772 0172 0-M9 1050 250-320 719 _B2-UO-G2 14011*LED4K---LE.2 1181 162 1.355 0. 77 2 '15 72 0-589 1050 250-3.10 72.9 82-U()-G2 14OW48LED4K-T-LE3W 11806 162 1-355 0-772 0-672 0-589 1050 250-320 72-9 62-UO-G2 140W43LED4K-1�-LE4 11806 162 1355 0- '772 0.672 0-5n 1050 250-320 72-9 82-UO-G2 14OW48LED4K-T-LE5 11806 262 1355 0772 0,672 0,589 1050 250-32; 7419 04-UO-G2 135WrsDLED4K-7-LE5 11817 132 1,105 0,639 0.561 0 495 530 250-320 1 69,5 1 84-UO-C-2 =25'C and fc'rwardwrrcnt =7COrmk 'L70=n,CCOhri (at �Uffer-, =1050-A) a 51vam warralat inckwdez rt,,e lamp and Va LED dri.ar. No" : Due to iapij aced continuous a4vw)c" in LED t#chnolo% LED fumsnake data kv svbje-2-t to change wirboW, notice And at th#40mietion of PbOos, SPEC20170120 — 003749 — 103610 01-20-2017 Page 6/6 PHILIPS LUMEC Saturn Cutoff LED SACL_ Series SACL Saturn Cutoff LED Optics Mounting Light Engin CCT Power Cord Length Finish Voltage Options selux R1 R2 R3 R5 Type I Type II Type III Type V Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution 1 1A 2 W Single Single Arm Double Wall Mount Mount LG4500 LG4700 LG4105 500 mA/51W 700 mA/65W 1050 mA/101W 35 40 50 'IDA Approved EI-0110:1 3500K 4000K 5000K For other OCT please consult factory 82,3 10713 122,3 162,3 182.3 XX2,3 °For 1 mounting use the pole 8' 10, 12' E 16' 18, XXr height 3For to or 2 mounting use the pale height,2 WH BK BZ SV SP White Black Bronze Silver Specify Premium Color 120 208 240 277 347* 480* Equipped with step-down transformer DS° HS FS4 PCT DM7•e DMY3 'Not available with 347 or 480 No Uplight House Side Single Fusing Photocell Dimming Dimming `LG4700 only Finish Shield (180') Tenon (0-10V) (Dynodim) q20, 240, 277 only See o. 7 for See o. 7 for LG4700, LG4105 only details details IDA Approved with 3000K CCT H Lxx° 7 ° L%IeSpec or Hi-Lo hotocell Switching Requirements) See p. 5 for heet for PROJECT: LARKIN TERRACE wRT IP65 A°E TYPE: PED MANUFACTURER: SELUX / LUMEC Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notic CAT #: SAC L-R5-1-LG4700-30-14-FINISH-VOLT-DS alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent vers / APR4F-13-13104-COLTX Saturn Cutoff LED SACL-I-XX- DS 1A �/_" "In..,. w.1 Specifications 1. Luminaire Cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, designed to ensure optimal thermal management for extra long life time of LED light engine. 2. Gasketing - (not shown) Continuous gasket provides weatherproofing, dust and insect con- trol at all fixture connections. 3. Luminaire Hood - Aluminum shade with white painted interior. 4. LED Array - (not shown) High flux LEDs mounted to PC boards and attached to alumi- num heat sink for maximum LED performance and life. CCT tolerance 1/4 step binning for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and ANSI standard for 5000K. CRI minimum 80 for 3000K, 3500K and 4000K and typical 80 for 5000K. Complete light engine can be removed easily for future upgrade. LED light engine provides a reported lumen maintenance of 91% at 60,000 hours. L70 calculated greater than 73,000 hours. 5. LED Driver - LEDs are driven by RoHS com- pliant high -efficiency driver. Excellent for cold temperature starting and instant on. Standard driver for DMY option is Philips Xitanium Driver. 6. Hood Supports - Two aluminum arms support shade and optic assembly and attach to the die cast aluminum pole fitter (shown painted matte black for DS option). m) For further details, please see installation instructions. 7. Pole Fitter - Self -leveling, die-cast low -cop- per aluminum alloy, fitter base secured to pole with three, stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Fitter for 3 1/2" (90mm) O.D. poles. 8. Driver cover - Die cast aluminum cover made from low copper alloy, removes for tool -less ac- cess to driver. Driver secured to removable tray for ease of maintenance (shown painted matte black for DS option). 9. Surge Protector - (not shown) Designed to protect luminaire from electrical surge (10kA). 10. Hi-Lo Switching Option - (not shown) Please see p. 5 for details. 11. Power Cord - (not shown) Pre -installed at factory. Please specify power cord length in accordance to height of the pole. Add 2 feet to power cord length if double mounting (2) is specified. Exterior Luminaire Finish - Selux utilizes a high quality Polyester Powder Coating. All Selux luminaires and poles are finished in our Tiger Drylac certified facility and undergo a five stage intensive pretreatment process where product is thoroughly cleaned, phosphated and sealed. Selux powder coated products provide excellent salt and humidity resistance as well as ultravio- let resistance for color retention. All products are tested in accordance with test specifications for coatings from ASTM and PCI. selux Standard exterior colors are White (WH), Black (BK), Bronze (BZ), and Silver (SV). Selux premium colors (SP) are available, please specify from your Selux color selection guide. 5 Year Limited LED Luminaire Warranty - Selux offers a 5 Year Limited Warranty to the original purchaser that the Saturn Cutoff LED luminaire shall be free from defects in material and workmanship for up to five (5) years from date of shipment. This limited warranty covers the LED driver and LED array when installed and operated according to Selux instructions. For details, see "Selux Terms and Condition of Sale." Listings and Ratings: Luminaire and LED tested to IP65 and IESNA LM-79-08 standards. LED tested to LM-80 standards. Luminaire and LED tested at 25°C ambient temperature. For LG4500 and LG4700, luminaire suitable for ambient temperatures of 55°C (130°F). For LG4105, luminaire suitable for ambient temperature of 45°C (113AF). Minimum op- erating temperature of luminaire at -35'C (-31AF). NRTL Listed (i.e. UL, CSA) Visit selux.us for our LED End of Life recycling policy. Selux Corporation ® 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 2 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Mounting Single (1) Single Arm Mount (1A) Die-cast aluminum fitter base Die-cast aluminum single luminaire secured to pole with three stainless mounting arm secured to pole with steel, Allen head set screws. four stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Outer slip fitter for T/i" O.D. tenon. EPA-1.3ft' (0.12m2) EPA = 2.3ft' (0.21 m') Weight = 39lbs. (17.7kg) Weight - 53lbs. (24.Okg) i O 10 28 V. 36" "— (720mm) (915mm) Double (2) Die-cast aluminum double luminaire mounting arm secured to pole with four stainless steel, Allen head set screws. Outer slip fitter for 31/2" O.D. tenon. EPA = 4.2ft2 (0.39m2) Weight=176lbs. (79.8kg) O O 72„ (1830mm) -�{ 5 (1! seLuX Wall (W) Die-cast aluminum double round wall mount arm. Se- cured to wall with'/." diameter threaded fasteners (by others). EPA = 2.1ft' (0.20m2) Weight = 50lbs. (22.7kg) 32" (813mm) f`- (SSSmm) Wall Arm Mounting Detail (Conduit and mounting hardware by others). 2'A. (65mm) 4's/,." (121mm) 7 9 v.,. (235mm) Selux Corporation © 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 3 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 Saturn Cutoff LED Wiring Standard Single Wiring & Dynadim (DMY) L1 FROM LINE N CORD 0-10V Dimming Option (DM) Wiring L34700 and LG4105, 120-277V. (347V and 480V available with step-down transformer.) L1 N FROM LINE CORD Dim W Dim selux Hi-Lo Switching Option (HL) Wiring LG4700 and LG4105, 120V, 240V, 277V. When red is energized, light output will be at "Lo" level. Specify low level by using one of the 3 levels listed below (i.e. HL70, HL50 and HL33). For other combinations, consult factory. L7 N FROM LINE CORD 347/480 V L1 FROM LINE N CORD Standard HL levels LG41O5 LG47OO HL70 = low output 70% X X HL50 = low output 50% X X HL33 = low output 33% X X Selux Corporation C 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 6 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 I. ) Saturn Cutoff LED Optional Accessories n.,nn,i;m Inil - Plcncc .cfor +.. the n.,..,..+;.., Opt;cn roar (includes a link to the Philips® Design -In Guide) on the Selux Saturn Cutoff LED weboagee under Additional Downloads. Photo Cell Tenon (PCT) - Button type photocell mounted in cast aluminum pole top tenon. Tenon has integral cast visor to prevent false start/stop cycle and can be oriented for optimum performance. Refer to luminaire spec sheet to determine if this option is applicable. 15 '/." (397mm) House Side Shield (14mm) Front view 8 Y." (219mm) selux , rately for infield installation behind hand hole (by others). Available up to 277V. No Uplight Finish (DS) - In order to achieve BUG UO rating, the hood support and the driver cover are painted matte black to avoid uplight. GFCI Receptacle (REC) - GFCI duplex receptacle with cast base bolted to pole and gasketed, provided with weather-proof, self - closing cover; located 36" (915mm) from base of pole, inline with hondhole. Receptacle is intended only for portable tools or other portable equipment to be connected to outlet only when attended by operating personnel (120V only). 2 "A", ... .... �(21mm) 4 (117mm) ell Side View Street House Side Side Selux Corporation © 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 7 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL_SSv3.5 11 Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry Conversion Chart Values based on 16' (4.9 m) mounting height Mounting Height Multiply 10' (3.0 m) 1.27 12' (3.7 m) 1.16 14' (4.3 m) 1.07 16' (4.9 m) 1.00 18' (5.5 m) 0.84 LED CCT Prorate Table Values based on Flux Binning CCT Theoretical Multiplier 3000K 1.00 3500K 0.961 4000K 1.073 5000K 1.115 LED Information Standard Power Electrical Specification (Type V Shown) ColorTemerature 5000K 4000K 3500K 3000K Drive Current 1050 700 500 1050 500 1050 1 700 500 1050 700 500 Delivered Lumens(1m), 8053 5805 4318 g700 7753 5589 1 4153 6946 5007 3724 7223 5207 3873 Wattage (W) 102 68 50 102 68 1 50 102 68 50 102 68 50 Efficacy (Im/W) 79 85 86 76 82 1 84 68 73 74 71 76 78 R1 Optics / 102W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-RI-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7116 Input Watts: 102.5W Efficacy: 69 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 5587 at 62.5° from vertical. IES classification - Type I Full -Cutoff Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) B2-UO-G1 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Lick ?o photometry- (PDF.) Lnk .r photornetry (IES) R2 Optics / 103W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #: SACL-R2-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7422 Input Watts: 103W Efficacy: 72 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 4799 at 47.5' from vertical IES classification - Type II Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) 82-U0-G1 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Linka photemeuy (i'DF) Link to photornetry (lES) \ I r r.�w.a.ue,.ae wn wi.,A-sr.s.v. wa.•a rers. xu.sr m.«a, r � selux Selux Corporation C 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us Page 8 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACLSSv3.5 e r. Saturn Cutoff LED Photometry R3 /spa._ / 65err/ LED / 5nnnv y�T Catalog #:SACL-R3-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 7599 Input Watts: 102W Efficacy: 74 Im/W CRI: >81 Maximum candela of 3709 at 60' from vertical. IES classification - Type III Full -Cutoff. Mounting Height = 16' (4.9 m) 62-UO-GI Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% Link to photometry (PDF) Link to photornetry (IES) R5 Optics / 65W LED / 5000K CCT Catalog #:SACL-RS-X-LG4105-50-120 Delivered Lumens: 103 Input Watts: 67W Efficacy: 79 Im/W CRI; �81 Maximum candela of 3004 at 60° from vertical. IES classification - Type V Mounting Height =16' (4.9 m) B3-UO-G1 Power Factor: 0.998 Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.84% L.ini, t.o phatcm:,try (PDF) Link to photcmt:ry !IES) et Vusfk�I�WMw rMxpn Mfa4a�dl MaN�(e�b�R�ioI1WT�mupn Nµiv�Ce.1 yN •ee G�•]eM'u IarwbMNmNweN erple•f36. Wpu MgN•e0 et ltieeN Twipn ttonunfw MYMelf bb-1161iTM fiNe�-�.1 e Nau,wp nNWif tnweea�aa to vom wu np Nnant b vWre�wan term w�iwq wWi, selux Selux Corporation C 2016, T 845-834-1400, 800-735-8927, F 845-834-1401, www.selux.us - Page 9 of 9 In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible, we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not (Rev. 12/2016) alter the function of the product. Specification sheets found at www.selux.us are the most recent versions and supercede all other printed or electronic versions. SACL-SSv3.5 Base & Bolts Information 3"{76mm} Projection Comes with 4 steel anchor bolts, 3, X 17" + 3" J Type Bolts, 8 nuts and washers. Important: Do not obstruct space between anchor plate and concrete base. Anchor Plate Free opening 3 5/16"0 -Bolt Circle: g4 nm4 8 1/2" (216mm) Material: Cast Aluminum � � NOTE: + Bolt Circle Allowed: i 6 3/4" to 10" I 171 mm to 254mm 244mm Qty 1 Pole APR4F-13-B104-COLTX Description of Components: Pole Shaft: Shall be made from a 4" (102mm) round extruded 6061-T6 aluminum tubing, having a 0.125" (3.2mm) wall thickness, welded to both the bottom and top of the anchor plate. Maintenance Opening: The pole shall have a 2" x 4 1/2" (51mm x 114mm) maintenance opening centered 20" (508mm) from the bottom of the anchor plate, complete with a weatherproof aluminum cover and a copper ground lug. Base Cover: Two piece round base cover made from cast 356 aluminum, mechanically fastened with stainless steel screws. Note: A tenon will be provided when the luminaire or bracket does not fit directly on pole shaft. Tenon not shown on the drawing. IMPORTANT: Philips Lumec strongly recommends the installation of the complete lighting assembly with all of its accessories upon the anchoring of the pole. This will ensure that the structural integrity of the product is maintained throughout its lifetime. Pole Weight: 22 Ibs (10 kg) SP EC20170119_235920_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 1 / 2 PHILIPS L__ Miscellaneous Description of Components: Hardware: All exposed screws shall be complete with Ceramic primer -seal basecoat to reduce seizing of the parts and offers a high resistance to corrosion. All seals and sealing devices are made and/or lined with EPDM and/or silicone and/or rubber. Finish: Textured color to be advised (Product Standard Color only): (COLTX) and in accordance with the AAMA 2603 standard. Application of polyester powder coat paint (4 mils/100 microns) with ± 1 mils/24 microns of tolerance. The Thermosetting resins provides a discoloration resistant finish in accordance with the ASTM D2244 standard, as well as luster retention in keeping with the ASTM D523 standard and humidity proof in accordance with the ASTM D2247 standard. The surface treatment achieves a minimum of 2000 hours for salt spray resistant finish in accordance with testing performed and per ASTM B117 standard. Note: IMPORTANT: All missing details must be clearly specified on the return of these approval drawings. Thank you for your cooperation. COLOR: Duality Control: The manufacturer must provide a written confirmation of its ISO 9001-2008 and ISO 14001-2004 International Quality Standards Certification. Vibration Resistance: Aluminum poles are not recommended in high vibration environments such as bridge, overpass, top of building, airport, train station, etc. Web site information details: / ISO 9001-2008 Certification / ISO 14001-2004 Certification / CSA Pale Certification SP EC20170119_235920_10361 _0 01-20-2017 Page 2/2 LI ..-SSG MEMO TO: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington; Georges Jacquemart, P.E.,AICP, BFJ FROM: Mark Smith, PE; David Grover, PE CC: Gregory Rabideau, AIA DATE: May 26, 2017 SUBJECT: Larking Terrace, South Burlington, VT: Response to Traffic Impact Study Comments Thank you for your comments on the Larkin Terrace Development Traffic Impact Study (TIS). We have incorporated your comments into the study where appropriate. We have also responded to the comments in bold below. RSG should explain that the distribution of site -generated trips in Figure 4 only include the net additional trips, not the total future site trips. Language was added to make this clearer. In regards to the suggested TDM measures, we would recommend that the bicycle racks be covered racks. Both covered and uncovered bicycle parking will be provided. This has been added to the study. In Figure 18 discussing the Road Impact Fees, RSG should explain how they calculated the 40 non- residential peak -hour trips. It also looks like the 6 additional dwelling units should be listed under Multi -Family units not Single -Family units. Language has been added to explain how the 40 trips were calculated. Information from previous studies noted that there are 61 existing residential units rather than the 54 in the TIS we submitted. Therefore, the study has been changed to note that there is no net gain in residential units. High Crash Location Regarding Section 7 Safety Analysis, RSG undertook a valuable analysis of safety conditions along the High Crash Location of Route 7 adjacent to the project site. It would be useful to hear recommendations regarding safety improvements along this stretch of Route 7. Unfortunately, the safety issues associated with US-7 are corridor -wide, and they will take a corridor -wide response. Dealing with these issues along US-7 is beyond the scope of this study. However, we have added a citation of the 2012 US-7 Corridor Report safety RSG 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 www.rsginc.com recommendations to our study and we recommend implementing the safety recommendations in that report. We believe that taking a broad view of the needs of the corridor will be the best way to improve safety for those traveling along it. PUD Parking We reviewed the shared -parking analysis for the complete PUD zone that concluded that an 8% waiver would be required, based on an annual peak demand occurring on a weekday evening between 8 and 10 pm for the period between Christmas and New Year. We believe that the demand estimation for this period is conservatively high because the underlying peak parking ratios seem high for a mixed -use area and the percentages of vehicle presence seem high for the period being analyzed. We agree Shared Parking On -Site The proposed project includes a total of 148 parking spaces, with 55 spaces inside the building and 93 spaces on the surface lot. We believe that the number of spaces will be sufficient for the three uses on the site as long as the parking spaces are used in a shared manner, i.e. the residents will not receive assigned parking spaces. We recommend that 55 residents receive a parking permit for garage parking. The monthly fee for garage parking should be set low enough such that all 55 garage spaces are used by residents. Access to the garage should be controlled by a gate activated by a remote card or RFID device. Between 15 and 20 retail employees could then obtain the same permit to park inside the garage during the regular retail hours when a significant portion of residents are out. This would then maximize the amount of parking lot spaces available to shoppers, restaurant patrons, residents and visitors during evening and Saturday midday peak periods. The attached table shows the shared parking calculations. The bottom row shows the number of residential cars that would park in the garage at all periods (basically 55/65 tunes the number of residential cars present on site for each period). We have not added this recommendation to the TIS, but we have spoken about it with the developer to be sure they understand your recommendation. 2 BFJ Buckhurst Fish &Jacquemart Inc. 115 5th Avenue New York, NY 10003 Tel (212) 353-7474 Fax (212) 353-7494 Memorandum To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Georges Jacquemart, P.E.,AICP Tel (212) 353 7477 Email g.jacquemart@bfjplanning.com Subject: Review of Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study Date: April 24, 2017 We have reviewed the Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact report prepared by RSG dated 4.14.2017. The report has been prepared in a professional manner in conformance with industry standards. Traffic Impact Analysis We agree that the traffic generation does not meet the Vtrans threshold for a traffic impact analysis beyond the project driveway. RSG should explain that the distribution of site -generated trips in Figure 4 only include the net additional trips, not the total future site trips. In regards to the suggested TDM measures, we would recommend that the bicycle racks be covered racks. In Figure 18 discussing the Road Impact Fees, RSG should explain how they calculated the 40 non-residential peak -hour trips. It also looks like the 6 additional dwelling units should be listed under Multi -Family units not Single -Family units. High Crash Location Regarding Section 7 Safety Analysis, RSG undertook a valuable analysis of safety conditions along the High Crash Location of Route 7 adjacent to the project site. It would be useful to hear recommendations regarding safety improvements along this stretch of Route 7. PUD Parking We reviewed the shared -parking analysis for the complete PUD zone that concluded that an 8% waiver would be required, based on an annual peak demand occurring on a weekday evening between 8 and 10 pm for the period between Christmas and New Year. We believe that the demand estimation for this period is conservatively high because the underlying peak parking ratios seem high for a mixed -use area and the percentages of vehicle presence seem high for the period being analyzed. Ray Belair, Administrative Officer April 25, 2017 Pane 2 Shared Parking On -Site The proposed project includes a total of 148 parking spaces, with 55 spaces inside the building and 93 spaces on the surface lot. We believe that the number of spaces will be sufficient for the three uses on the site as long as the parking spaces are used in a shared manner, i.e. the residents will not receive assigned parking spaces. We recommend that 55 residents receive a parking permit for garage parking. The monthly fee for garage parking should be set low enough such that all 55 garage spaces are used by residents. Access to the garage should be controlled by a gate activated by a remote card or RFID device. Between 15 and 20 retail employees could then obtain the same permit to park inside the garage during the regular retail hours when a significant portion of residents are out. This would then maximize the amount of parking lot spaces available to shoppers, restaurant patrons, residents and visitors during evening and Saturday midday peak periods. The attached table shows the shared parking calculations. The bottom row shows the number of residential cars that would park in the garage at all periods (basically 55/65 times the number of residential cars present on site for each period). ira Building Use Size 1000 Sq. Ft. or Dwelling Units Retail 17.097 Restaurant 3.25 ResiStudio/lbedr 50 Resi 2 bedroom 10 Total LARKIN TERRACE SHARED PARKING CALCULATION Peak Parking Weekday Saturday (individual Weekday AM Weekday Lunch Weekday PM Evening (7-8 Weekday Night Midday (12-2 peaks) (10-11 AM) (12-2 PM) (3-4 PM) PM) (11pm-6am) PM) Ratio Spaces oho Cars % ! Cars % Cars % Cars % Cars % Cars Present Present Present Present Present Present 4 68 70% 48 85% 58 75% 51 70% 48 0% 0 100% 68 12 39 30% 12 75% 29 50% 20 100% 39 10% 4 75% 29 1 50 45% 23 45% 23 45% 23 70% 35 100% 50 60% 30 1.5 15 45% 7 45% 7 45% 7 70% 11 100% 15 60% 9 172 1 89 117 100 132 69 137 Residential cars in garage: 25 25 25 39 55 33 Notes: 1. The peak parking column represents the amount of parking that would have to be supplied if each use was built independently on its own lot. These ratios may be the ratios required by zoning or the ratios given for each use by the ITE publication "Parking Generation" 4th Edition, 2010 and adjusted for the modal split. 2. The percentages for the presence of each peak parking demand by time period are based on "Shared Parking" by the Urban Land Institute 2005 Second Edition, "Parking Generation" 4th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010, and on BFJ experience. 3. It is assumed that the residential spaces are all shared, not reserved BFJ April 25, 2017 E MEMO &;:ZSG TO: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington; Georges Jacquemart, P.E.,AICP, BFJ FROM: Mark Smith, PE; David Grover, PE CC: Gregory Rabideau, AIA DATE: May 26, 2017 SUBJECT: Larking Terrace, South Burlington, VT: Response to Traffic Impact Study Comments Thank you for your comments on the Larkin Terrace Development Traffic Impact Study (TIS). We have incorporated your comments into the study where appropriate. We have also responded to the comments in bold below. RSG should explain that the distribution of site -generated trips in Figure 4 only include the net additional trips, not the total future site trips. Language was added to make this clearer. In regards to the suggested TDM measures, we would recommend that the bicycle racks be covered racks. Both covered and uncovered bicycle parking will be provided. This has been added to the study. In Figure 18 discussing the Road Impact Fees, RSG should explain how they calculated the 40 non- residential peak -hour trips. It also looks like the 6 additional dwelling units should be listed under Multi -Family units not Single -Family units. Language has been added to explain how the 40 trips were calculated. Information from previous studies noted that there are 61 existing residential units rather than the 54 in the TIS we submitted. Therefore, the study has been changed to note that there is no net gain in residential units. High Crash Location Regarding Section 7 Safety Analysis, RSG undertook a valuable analysis of safety conditions along the High Crash Location of Route 7 adjacent to the project site. It would be useful to hear recommendations regarding safety improvements along this stretch of Route 7. Unfortunately, the safety issues associated with US-7 are corridor -wide, and they will take a corridor -wide response. Dealing with these issues along US-7 is beyond the scope of this study. However, we have added a citation of the 2012 US-7 Corridor Report safety RSG 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 www.rsginc.com recommendations to our study and we recommend implementing the safety recommendations in that report. We believe that taking a broad view of the needs of the corridor will be the best way to improve safety for those traveling along it. PUD Parking We reviewed the shared -parking analysis for the complete PUD zone that concluded that an 8% waiver would be required, based on an annual peak demand occurring on a weekday evening between 8 and 10 pm for the period between Christmas and New Year. We believe that the demand estimation for this period is conservatively high because the underlying peak parking ratios seem high for a mixed -use area and the percentages of vehicle presence seem high for the period being analyzed. We agree Shared Parking On -Site The proposed project includes a total of 148 parking spaces, with 55 spaces inside the building and 93 spaces on the surface lot. We believe that the number of spaces will be sufficient for the three uses on the site as long as the parking spaces are used in a shared manner, i.e. the residents will not receive assigned parking spaces. We recommend that 55 residents receive a parking permit for garage parking. The monthly fee for garage parking should be set low enough such that all 55 garage spaces are used by residents. Access to the garage should be controlled by a gate activated by a remote card or RFID device. Between 15 and 20 retail employees could then obtain the same permit to park inside the garage during the regular retail hours when a significant portion of residents are out. This would then maximize the amount of parking lot spaces available to shoppers, restaurant patrons, residents and visitors during evening and Saturday midday peak periods. The attached table shows the shared parking calculations. The bottom row shows the number of residential cars that would park in the garage at all periods (basically 55/65 times the number of residential cars present on site for each period). We have not added this recommendation to the TIS, but we have spoken about it with the developer to be sure they understand your recommendation. 4 E 1 theOther Paper • otherpapervt.eom • May 18, 2017 • 19 pared to staywith Carney tnd that's just the kind of layed in his players' lives. always going to pick up ie if you needed him, he rys going to help you out, ,ould never say no. He was h footballcoach' that rep- . everything a young man ry to become. I am now a nd every time a kid asks i something, I know Rene : say no, so why would IT' Berge in the Dolphin youth football program. "The most important thing I learned from the program was the value of hard work and perseverance," MannyBoardman, a fellow award winner at the same May 7 banquet, said. "I learned that most of the important things in life don't come easy; that if you want to be successful, you have to workhard. This is something that I continually try to applyto all areas of my life,"• he said. This lesson appears to be a strategy that all of his former athletes apply to their lives. LaBerge's former players are located all over the country. 50 of them are coaching high school or college football. There are a wide range of careers and life paths, but one thing is constant: all of these players remember PRIDE. "I could call on anyplace, in any profession, and one of my boys is there," LaBerge said. Over the last 50 years, LaBerge has a lot of fond memories, but his fondest of all was when his wife Linda was inducted into the National Football Hall of Fame. He realizes how things would have been different without her by his aid. side. "There is no way I could ever, ion to spending entire ever, ever in a million years do this h former players to help this long without her. She held the se their game, he was also fort down no matter what," he e who'd step up in the said. In addition to his wife, many dlenging of times. Former people over the years have helped nd now Essex Chargers out the program, especially the ach Tony Arcovitch re- Belisle family, who spent more •s Coach LaBerge as the than 33 years contributing to the o kept his life together success of the South Burlington e desperately needed Dolphins. Dick, Nancy, Brian and 3 to play that role. "Rene Jody all played important roles :enced my life more than over the years, as did long-time .r person. He was there coaches Tom Tavares, Bob Gild- rhen I was going through ing, and Sam Jackson. ifficult time. He taught cannel my pain and an- LaBerge believes his greatest ac- igh the game of football. complishment is all the kids who re in e- the love and sense are carrying on PRIDE. Says long 'for the game that I carry time Dolphin coachTom Tavares, today. He always said to "The lessons of discipline, hard :. At an early age, I decided work, tenacity and tough love will ichwas therefor me when extend for generations through it most in mylife, and that his former players," and that there for someone else. appears to be' exactly what has in life was to influence happened. player the way Rene did Arcotvith said. After 30 Football_ is a sport unlike any coaching and more than other. In the game of football, at the helm of the Essex each player has to do their job: On ;, Arcovitch has influenced any given play, if just one person ;s number of people the doesn't do their job, the team can- y that LaBerge did for him. not be successful. In some ways, that's how life works too. In build- rrent South Burlington ins a football team, coaches teach E PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South. Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 7:00 PM. to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-17-11 of Edward G. Hoehn, III to subdivide a 10.29 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into four (4) lots ranging in size from 1.01 acres to 5.04 acres, 1700 Dorset Street. 2. Final plat application #SD-17-12 of Marilyn Larkin for a planned unit development consisting of. 1) razing a 61 unit hotel (Larkin Ter- race), and 2) constructing a 77,618 sq, ft, building which will include 60 residential units and 21,653 sq. ft. of commercial space, 1185 & 1195 Shelburne Road Bill Miller, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. May 18, 2017 YFIND'!- 9 1 n F; t-INAN �aPPiness Kelly Services® is now hiring seasonal delivery drivers for assignments with Fed Ex Ground®. Don't miss out! Details: • 21 years or older • Business -related driving experience required • Weekly pay • Safety bonus plan ® kellyservices.us Inquire in Person - Monday - Friday gam - Spm 322 Leroy Road Williston, VT 05495 802-651-6837 KELLY Larkin Terrace Wagner Hodgson Landscape Architects 10/18/16 • Plantings along Shelburne Rd are in the State of Vermont Right of Way and are not maintained by the City of South Burlington. Should check with the Agency of Transportation regarding plantings in their Right of Way. • Would not recommend under planting shrubs and perennials along Shelburne Rd. This is where the snow and salt from 3 lanes of traffic and the sidewalk will end up • Any areas where trees are to be planted that are currently under pavement require soil replacement or soil restoration to a minimum depth of 2 feet to support tree growth • Due to their inherent tight branch structure, 'Princeton' Elms may pose structural problems as they mature, requiring pruning on a regular basis to reduce the potential for branch failure. For this reason a substitute species may want to be considered 6/1/17 All the above comments still apply, islands to be planted with trees should be continuous planting pits filled with planting soil to a depth of 2 ft. or existing soil should be restored to provide a suitable medium for tree growth LOL TiabideauArchiteas April 14, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for final plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 61 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited under this application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,697 square feet and will feature 60 apartments comprised of 50 one bedroom units and 10 two bedroom units. In addition, there will 17,169 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. We have included 3,250 square feet of restaurant use as a portion of this space. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 550H.inesburg Read I Suite 1011 South 8urlingtcn,'VT 054a3`1802 863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architscts.ccm' 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of the primary roof, 49.25 feet to the top of decorative parapets, and 63 feet to the top of the Tower element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Density: The base residential density for the subject property is 12 dwelling units per acre. The attached plan entitled "DP-1 - Density Calculation Site Plan" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Inc. and dated October 28, 2016 shows where in the PUD the density for this phase is drawn from. The density for this phase is drawn from the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road (former Larkin Terrace) and a two acre portion of the lands of Farrell at 1195 Shelburne Road. Housing Affordability: The subject properties are located in the C-1 Auto district. This district has a base density of 12 units per acre that when applied to the 40.8 acres of involved land yields an allowable density of 489.6 dwelling units. To date, 210 units have been built in the Old Orchard Apartments, which leaves 279.6 units of unused residential density. The proposed reconstruction of Larkin Terrace will draw an additional 60 units of base density from this pool. This leaves 213 dwelling units for the remaining phases of the project without the application of any affordable housing bonuses allowed by the LDRs. It is important to the applicant that the specific source of the project density is defined. While this does not bear directly of the requirements of the ordinance, it is important to the partners and /or other parties with a material interest in the PUD. For that purpose we have submitted Civil Engineering Drawing DP-1 prepared by Krebs and Lansing showing where we would derive the density for the current application. 60 units of density at 12 units an acre would impact 5 acres. The applicant expressly defines the acres involved as the original 2.54 acres of the old Larkin Terrace and 2 acres of land at 1195 Shelburne Road. This provides a source of the density without application of any density bonuses or any commercial impact on related parties. The South Burlington Affordable Housing requirements established under Article 18 of the Land Use Regulations only apply in the City Center District at 18-B. Applicability (1) Covered Development: " Except as otherwise provided in this bylaw, the provisions of this section shall apply within the City Center Form Based Codes District..." It is our conclusion that the application to redevelop Larkin Terrace is not subject to the affordable housing requirements of article 18 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations. The applicant has declined to avail themselves of the affordable housing density bonus because there is already ample density available at the base rate. It should be remembered that the existing hotel / apartments at Larkin Terrace are rented at market rates, and that the existing property does not receive federal development funding, nor is it enrolled in any current housing affordability programs requiring rent restrictions. Consistent with the law, the applicant accepts Section 8 Housing vouchers as appropriate at all of their rental properties. The applicant is willing and eager to help the current residents of Larkin Terrace transition to other housing, but does not want to concede to a requirement not established by ordinance. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 054M 1802-863,02 2 1 Rabideau-Arestmtsxorn Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build -out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. Plans and details of this system are included in the attached engineering drawings. Please note that we are proposing to meet a portion of our required landscaping budget by landscaping the area around this pond. Please refer to the landscaping plan for details. Traffic: A complete traffic analysis prepared by Resource Systems Group is attached. Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current 2.5 acre site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The project as proposed will include the construction of new storm water treatment features that will improve water quality in Bartletts Brook and the greater Lake Champlain water shed by upgrading the storm water system to current standards. Parking: Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. There are 55 parking spaces proposed under the building including one ADA Compliant Accessible parking stall. There are 93 surfaces spaces proposed including 4 ADA compliant spaces. This gives us a total of 148 parking spaces of which 5 meet ADA standards. This application includes a request to amend and existing shared parking program that includes all parking within the subdivision. A detailed report on shared parking and any attendant waiver requests prepared by Resource Systems Group is herby attached. The parking requirements examined in that report include the following impacts: PUD-wide: Maximum demand 646 Available 594 Waiver 8.1% Larkin Terrace Only: Larkin Terrace 195 Avaliable 148 Waiver 24.1% With Shared Parking: Larkin Terrace 153 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 Sou`h Burlington, VT 05403 13r-863 0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Avaliable 148 Waiver 3.0% Fire Protection: We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access.. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. The new structures will be Set Backs and Coverage: We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet on Fayette Road, a waiver of the front yard set -back from Shelburne Road from 30 feet to 18 feet and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. Please refer to Sheet A-999 prepared by Rabideau Architects Inc. and entitled "Street Sections," and last revised April 14, 2017. The applicant further requests permission to include glass canopies in the manner of Church Street in Burlington to provide cover at the entries to the commercial space. These canopies would extend into the requested set -back by 4 feet. In consideration of the relaxed set -back rules, the applicant proposes to step the principal fa4ade back above the Street level by between 2- 4.75 feet. Building Height: The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. The current building site is very flat with an average pre -construction grade of 202.16 feet. We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 45 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 62.75 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Building Materials: The primary exterior material proposed is a standard modular clay masonry face brick. This is accented by cut limestone trim bands and a few rusticated panels. Major openings in the commercial storefronts are trimmed with painted steel portal frames which will add interest and act as lintels to support the masonry. Custom steel frames are also used as a modern reinterpretation of cornice brackets at the top of the building and on all levels of the tower element. Additional materials proposed are cement lap siding and zinc coated shingles. 550 Hinesburg RoaJ I`Suite 1 Q1 ( South Burlirgton, VT 05403 130[- 3 02221 RabirJeau Arcn tects.com Storage and Waste Handling: Trash and recycling of wastes will be enclosed in a cut out portion of the building on the south side of the Fayette Road wing. This area will be screened from outside view by a combination of an aluminum fence and coordinated plantings per the enclosed building drawings and landscape plan. An enclosed room at the parking level is provided for bicycle storage at the street level. In addition tenants will have access to chain link enclosures at the rear of the basement parking spaces for the storage of bikes, skis, snow tires and other items. Conclusion: Since preliminary plat approval, the design team has worked to refine and improve the building design. This is a complicated undertaking and we appreciate your patience and insights during the permitting process. On behalf of the entire design team I say "Thank You", and ask that you approve this project. Sincerely, Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Buriirpn, T 05403 j 802-863 9222 1 Rabideau-Arrtitects.ccrn 'D U RabideauArchitects April 14, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for final plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 61 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited under this application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,697 square feet and will feature 60 apartments comprised of 50 one bedroom units and 10 two bedroom units. In addition, there will 17,169 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. We have included 3,250 square feet of restaurant use as a portion of this space. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of the primary roof, 49.25 feet to the top of decorative parapets, and 63 feet to the top of the Tower element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Density: The base residential density for the subject property is 12 dwelling units per acre. The attached plan entitled "DP-1- Density Calculation Site Plan" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Inc. and dated October 28, 2016 shows where in the PUD the density for this phase is drawn from. The density for this phase is drawn from the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road (former Larkin Terrace) and a two acre portion of the lands of Farrell at 1195 Shelburne Road. Housing Affordability: The subject properties are located in the C-1 Auto district. This district has a base density of 12 units per acre that when applied to the 40.8 acres of involved land yields an allowable density of 489.6 dwelling units. To date, 210 units have been built in the Old Orchard Apartments, which leaves 279.6 units of unused residential density. The proposed reconstruction of Larkin Terrace will draw an additional 60 units of base density from this pool. This leaves 213 dwelling units for the remaining phases of the project without the application of any affordable housing bonuses allowed by the LDRs. It is important to the applicant that the specific source of the project density is defined. While this does not bear directly of the requirements of the ordinance, it is important to the partners and /or other parties with a material interest in the PUD. For that purpose we have submitted Civil Engineering Drawing DP-1 prepared by Krebs and Lansing showing where we would derive the density for the current application. 60 units of density at 12 units an acre would impact 5 acres. The applicant expressly defines the acres involved as the original 2.54 acres of the old Larkin Terrace and 2 acres of land at 1195 Shelburne Road. This provides a source of the density without application of any density bonuses or any commercial impact on related parties. The South Burlington Affordable Housing requirements established under Article 18 of the Land Use Regulations only apply in the City Center District at 18-B. Applicability (1) Covered Development: " Except as otherwise provided in this bylaw, the provisions of this section shall apply within the City Center Form Based Codes District..." It is our conclusion that the application to redevelop Larkin Terrace is not subject to the affordable housing requirements of article 18 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations. The applicant has declined to avail themselves of the affordable housing density bonus because there is already ample density available at the base rate. It should be remembered that the existing hotel / apartments at Larkin Terrace are rented at market rates, and that the existing property does not receive federal development funding, nor is it enrolled in any current housing affordability programs requiring rent restrictions. Consistent with the law, the applicant accepts Section 8 Housing vouchers as appropriate at all of their rental properties. The applicant is willing and eager to help the current residents of Larkin Terrace transition to other housing, but does not want to concede to a requirement not established by ordinance. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build -out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. Plans and details of this system are included in the attached engineering drawings. Please note that we are proposing to meet a portion of our required landscaping budget by landscaping the area around this pond. Please refer to the landscaping plan for details. Traffic: A complete traffic analysis prepared by Resource Systems Group is attached. Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current 2.5 acre site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The project as proposed will include the construction of new storm water treatment features that will improve water quality in Bartletts Brook and the greater Lake Champlain water shed by upgrading the storm water system to current standards. Parking: Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. There are 55 parking spaces proposed under the building including one ADA Compliant Accessible parking stall. There are 93 surfaces spaces proposed including 4 ADA compliant spaces. This gives us a total of 148 parking spaces of which 5 meet ADA standards. This application includes a request to amend and existing shared parking program that includes all parking within the subdivision. A detailed report on shared parking and any attendant waiver requests prepared by Resource Systems Group is herby attached. The parking requirements examined in that report include the following impacts: PUD-wide: Maximum demand 646 Available 594 Waiver 8.1% Larkin Terrace Only: Larkin Terrace 195 Avaliable 148 Waiver 24.1% With Shared Parking: Larkin Terrace 153 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 I Rabideau-Architects.com Avaliable 148 Waiver 3.0% Fire Protection: We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access.. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. The new structures will be Set Backs and Coverage: We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet on Fayette Road, a waiver of the front yard set -back from Shelburne Road from 30 feet to 18 feet and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. Please refer to Sheet A-999 prepared by Rabideau Architects Inc. and entitled "Street Sections," and last revised April 14, 2017. The applicant further requests permission to include glass canopies in the manner of Church Street in Burlington to provide cover at the entries to the commercial space. These canopies would extend into the requested set -back by 4 feet. In consideration of the relaxed set -back rules, the applicant proposes to step the principal fa4ade back above the Street level by between 2- 4.75 feet. Building Height: The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. The current building site is very flat with an average pre -construction grade of 202.16 feet. We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 45 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 62.75 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Building Materials: The primary exterior material proposed is a standard modular clay masonry face brick. This is accented by cut limestone trim bands and a few rusticated panels. Major openings in the commercial storefronts are trimmed with painted steel portal frames which will add interest and act as lintels to support the masonry. Custom steel frames are also used as a modern reinterpretation of cornice brackets at the top of the building and on all levels of the tower element. Additional materials proposed are cement lap siding and zinc coated shingles. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Storage and Waste Handling: Trash and recycling of wastes will be enclosed in a cut out portion of the building on the south side of the Fayette Road wing. This area will be screened from outside view by a combination of an aluminum fence and coordinated plantings per the enclosed building drawings and landscape plan. An enclosed room at the parking level is provided for bicycle storage at the street level. In addition tenants will have access to chain link enclosures at the rear of the basement parking spaces for the storage of bikes, skis, snow tires and other items. Conclusion: Since preliminary plat approval, the design team has worked to refine and improve the building design. This is a complicated undertaking and we appreciate your patience and insights during the permitting process. On behalf of the entire design team I say "Thank You", and ask that you approve this project. Sincerely, Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com ray From: Derick Read < Derick. Read@krebsandlansing.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:58 AM To: Dave Wheeler Cc: ray; Deb Sherman; Joe Larkin Subject: Larkin Terrace HydroCAD model Attachments: LT - Stormwater.hcp Hi Dave, Please find attached the HydroCAD model for the Larkin Terrace project, as requested. Please contact us with any questions. Deke Derick Read, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 878-0375 Derick.Read@krebsandlansin,g.com 1504 - LARKIN TERRACE - ABBUTTERS LIST PARCEL ID 911# Unit Street Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 0675-00007 7 FAYETTE RD 7 FAYETTE, LLC P 0 BOX 1004 JERICHO CENTER VT 05465 0675-00010 10 FAYETTE RD L & M PARTNERSHIP 105 APPLETREE POINT RD BURLINGTON VT 05408 0675-00040 40 FAYETTE RD SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES INC P 0 BOX 1000 PORTLAND ME 04100 0870-00005 5 HOLMES RD FARRELL DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 0675-00040 189 HANNAFORD DR LOWE'S P 0 BOX 1111 N WILKESBORO NC 128656 1269-00001 1 OLDE ORCHARD LN OLDE ORCHARD REALTY PARTNERSHIP LP PO BOX 4193 BURLINGTON VT 05402 1269-00002 2 OLDE ORCHARD LN 1269-00003 3 OLDE ORCHARD LN 1269-00004 4 OLDE ORCHARD LN 1269-00005 5 OLDE ORCHARD LN 0675-00022 6 OLDE ORCHARD LN 1269-00024 7 OLDE ORCHARD LN 1540-01095 1095 SHELBURNE RD KAPSHA PROPERTIES LLC 1095 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01110 1110 SHELBURNE RD JOLLEY ASSOCIATES LLC 54 LOWER WELDON ST STALBANS VT 05478 1540-01116 1116 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELL T 460 21ST CENTURY PARK RD CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 1540-01117 1117 SHELBURNE RD CRE JV MIXED FIFTEEN NE BRANCH HOLDINGS P 0 BOX 460049 HOUSTON TX 77056 1540-01120 1120 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELL T & SHELLEY C P 0 BOX 347 NORTHFIELD VT 05663 1540-01125 1125 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP C/O MCDONALDS P 0 BOX 447 ESSEX JCT VT 05453 1540-01184 1184 SHELBURNE RD GRANDVIEW FARMS INC P 0 BOX 1304 BURLINGTON VT 05402 1540-01185 1185 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN, MARILYN 410 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01195 1195 SHELBURNE RD FARRELL, DAVID M TRUSTEE 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01200 1200 SHELBURNE RD WILSON, WILLIAM 1200 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01210 1210 SHELBURNE RD SISTERS & BROTHERS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 75 S WINOOSKI AVE BURLINGTON VT 05401 1540-01230 1230 SHELBURNE RD 1220 SHELBURNE RD CORP 1512 LAKE RD MILTON VT 05468 1540-01233 1233 A SHELBURNE RD TWO O'BRIENS PROPERTIES LLC 1475 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233B 1233 B SHELBURNE RD FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE B1 SO BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 CO2 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK LN CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 CO3 SHELBURNE RD W & K PROPERTY LLC 1233 D SHELBURNE RD UNIT#3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 C1 SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD UNIT C-1 SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 11233 C2 SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE C2 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 C3 SHELBURNE RD ALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING ST WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233C 1233 C4 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233C 1233 C5 SHELBURNE RD ROCK DUNDER PROPERTIES LLC 1223 SHELBURNE RD #C5 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D1 SHELBURNE RD ADAMS, JOHN S & SUZANNE N 126 WHITE WATER CIRCLE WILLISTON VT 05495 1540-1233D 1233 D4 SHELBURNE RD GREEN & COIL LLC 78 CURTIS AVE BURLINGTON VT 105401 1540-1233D 1233 D5 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 1233D SHELBURNE RD STE D 6B S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D6 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 D7 SHELBURNE RD ARROW TECH ASSOC INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD STE D7 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D8 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 D9 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233E 1233 E1 SHELBURNE RD G & K HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD UNIT E-1 S BURLINGTON VT 105403 1540-1233E 1233 E3 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK LN CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233E 11233 E4 SHELBURNE RD HILL, MARK D TRUST 1233 SHELBURNE RD E-4 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 E5 SHELBURNE RD LOWREY, RICHARD L SR & SUSAN 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE E5 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 E6 SHELBURNE RD ALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING ST WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233E 1233 IE7 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233F 1233 IF ISHELBURNE RD EASTMAN, MARGARET S TRUST 11163 THOMPSONS POINT RD ICHARLOTTE JVT 105445 Rabidea uArchitectS RkEIVED !.PR 17 2017 City df SO. Burlington Rabideau Architer,'-�-' 550 Hinesburg Rd I Suite 101 1 South Burlington, VT 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com ray From: David Grover < David.G rover@ rsg i nc.com > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 12:46 PM To: Georges.Jacquemart@live.com Cc: Gregory Rabideau; ray; Deb Sherman; Mark Smith Subject: Traffic Impact Study review for South Burlington, VT Attachments: Larkin Terrace Traffic Impact Study Report 04-14-2017.pdf Hi Georges, RSG has completed the traffic impact study for the Larkin Terrace Development in South Burlington, VT (attached). I believe you had started reviewing this study, but the development program changed, which added a few more trips. It would be great if you are able get your comments to the City by May 51 to meet the deadlines for the upcoming hearing. Please let me know if three weeks is insufficient time to review this study. I'm happy to answer any questions that may come up in your review Thanks, David ..................................................... DAVID GROVER, PE Senior Analyst RSG 180 Battery St., Suite 350 i Burlington, VT 05401 802.861.0505 www.rsqinc.com May 9, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board c/o City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street , South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-16-29 of John P. Larkin and Eric Farrell Members of the Board, We are pleased to return before you for Final Plat approval of the Larkin Terrace Redevelopment project. The City of South Burlington has asked the applicant to produce an affordable housing plan in order to be considered to have fully completed its final application for 1185 Shelburne Rd. It is this applicant's position that provision of an explicit housing affordability plan is not a requirement of law, and therefore may not be used to delay or deny approval of the project per the "Zoning Administrators Handbook." Nevertheless, the applicant recognizes the good intent of the request and shares in the common interest of developing housing for a wide range of income levels and therefore presents the plan below. The applicant offers that if they (or closely related entities) request bonus density as part of this PUD on lands in which they have ownership (to be defined), then the applicant will retroactively include the currently proposed building. By way of example, if applicant requests a bonus density of 60 units in future phases, 6 of these units will be retroactively included in this first phase, in this way affordable housing units, if included in the project, are distributed throughout multiple phases. This is an innovative project that we hope will act as a catalyst for additional creative development moving forward. The applicant and the design team look forward to a continued collaboration with the City of South Burlington and ask you to vote in favor of this project in general and this proposal in specific. Sincerely, Additional Considerations: • While the applicant has not formally submitted a Master Plan for future development of the PUD, overtime, there may be lands added to the PUD and/or further development inside the PUD. The timing and scale of future development is difficult to predict and for this reason the current project is contemplated as a "stand-alone." That said, infrastructure (road networks, utilities, etc) has been designed to allow for future contiguous development. • The PUD has, and will continue to have, multiple underlying land owners, some are related entities, and others are not. The applicant cannot make commitments on behalf of other land owners of the PUD. By way of example, the applicant was asked to state that he would never ask for bonus density in future phases. While the applicant currently doesn't see the need for additional density, the applicant cannot say that a member of the PUD will never ask for an affordable housing density bonus. • As a re -development project, this first phase will bear significant costs to demolish existing structures, relocated numerous utilities, provide for current and projected storm water treatment and more. Deferring a more substantial approach to affordability to future phases would allow the applicant to define and absorb such expenses now in exchange for more flexibility moving forward. • We are not asking for a bonus density waiver for the current proposal. The DRB raised the concern that at some point in future phases the applicant would ask for bonus density for affordable units and the inexorable result would be all the affordable units would be clustered in a single building. • At the Preliminary Plat Hearing a member of the DRB raised concerns over the demolition of existing "affordable" housing stock. There was discussion and explanation that the current product was market rate and not specifically part of an affordable housing program. • Scaffolding for affordability: Access to public transit, walk -ability to key services, mixed use development, unit size and energy efficiency are all components of producing housing for a range of incomes. While the market rents for this project have not yet been determined, we believe the above factors will positively impact the cost of living for future residents. • Chapter 3. Limits of Authority: It is this applicant's position that provision of an explicit housing affordability plan is not a requirement of law, and therefore may not be used to delay or deny approval of the project per the "Zoning Administrators Handbook" Third Edition, October 2005 Literal Interpretation.: The Zoning Administrator must literally interpret the zoning bylaws [§4448(a)] and has no discretion to: 0 1. Vary any requirement of duly adopted bylaws; o 2. Make any changes in the terms of the bylaws; or o 3. Grant or refuse a permit for reasons unrelated to the bylaws and not within the • scope of authority delegated by state statute. • Under the Current South Burlington Comprehensive Land Use Regulations, last revised June 27, 2016 the City of South Burlington has only established a requirement for affordable housing in the City Center Form Based Code Districts under article 18, section 18.01A "purpose." That notwithstanding, even if the project were otherwise required to comply with Article 18 of the LDRs, the project would be exempt from the requirement under 18.01 B (2) c, • B. Applicability (2) Exemptions. • The following developments are exempt from these requirements: (c) The redevelopment of existing dwelling units in a project that produces no additional units. • • As you know, that is precisely what is proposed for the Larkin Terrace project. To summarize, South Burlington Land Use Regulations do not require affordable housing in the C-1 Auto District, and even if it did, this specific project would be exempt from the requirement, and therefore neither the Development Review Board or City Planning Staff may refuse this permit application on the basis of Affordable Housing. It follows that any discussion and agreement between the City and this Applicant to provide affordable housing would be voluntary, and that the DRB grant the applicant maximum flexibility in seeking to address housing affordability. Conclusion: It is our considered opinion that the City of South Burlington does not have the regulatory authority to mandate affordable housing in the current phase of this project. However, in the spirit of cooperation that has characterized the approval process to date, the applicant has volunteered to accept a provision in the permit that makes sure that if and / or when affordable density bonuses are used within the PUD as a whole, that designated affordable units will be evenly distributed throughout the PUD, including retroactively to the phase now under consideration. 550 Hnesburg Real f Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 054.03 1 802-863-rz22 ( Rabideau-Architec[s.com Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 5/12/17 Comments Due: 5/29/17 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-17-12 of Marilyn Larkin for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 61 unit hotel (Larkin Terrace), and 2) constructing an 77,618 sq. ft. building which will include 60 residential units and 21,653 sq. ft. of commercial space, 1185 & 1195 Shelburne Road. Meeting date: June 6, 2017 south' A Plan Transmittal Form To: Fire Department/ Department of Public Works From: Ray Belair Date Transmitted: 5/12/2017 Comments Due: 5/29/17 Project Description/Meeting Date: Final plat application #SD-17-12 of Marilyn Larkin for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 61 unit hotel (Larkin Terrace), and 2) constructing an 77,618 sq. ft. building which will include 60 residential units and 21,653 sq. ft. of commercial space, 1185 & 1195 Shelburne Road. Meeting date: June 6, 2017 t 3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 15 day of May , 20 17, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Final Plat [type of application] # SD-17-12 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section l 7.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See Attached Dated at S. Burlingtc[town/city], Vermont, this 15 day of May 92017 Printed Name: Phone number and email Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 PARCEL ID 911# Unit Street Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 0675-00007 7 FAYETTE RD 7 FAYETTE, LLC P 0 BOX 1004 JERICHO CENTER VT 05465 0675-00010 10 FAYETTE RD L & M PARTNERSHIP 105 APPLETREE POINT RD BURLINGTON VT 05408 0675-00040 40 FAYETTE RD SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES INC P 0 BOX 1000 PORTLAND ME 04100 0870-00005 5 HOLMES RD FARRELL DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 0675-00040 189 HANNAFORD DR LOWE'S P 0 BOX 1111 N WILKESBORO NC 28656 1269-00001 1 1 OLDE ORCHARD L OLDE ORCHARD REALTY PARTNERSHIP LP PO BOX 4193 BURLINGTON VT 05402 1269-00002 2 1 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00003 3 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00004 4 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00005 5 OLDE ORCHARD L 0675-00022 6 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00024 7 OLDE ORCHARD L 1540-01095 1095 SHELBURNE RD KAPSHA PROPERTIES LLC 1095 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01110 1110 1 SHELBURNE RD JOLLEY ASSOCIATES LLC 54 LOWER WELDON ST ST ALBANS VT 05478 1540-01116 1116 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELL T 460 21ST CENTURY PARK RD CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 1540-01117 1117 SHELBURNE RD CRE IV MIXED FIFTEEN NE BRANCH HOLDING P 0 BOX 460049 HOUSTON TX 77056 1540-01120 1120 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELL T & SHELLEY C P 0 BOX 347 NORTHFIELD VT 05663 1540-01125 1125 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP C/O MCDONALE P 0 BOX 447 ESSEX JCT VT 05453 1540-01184 1184 SHELBURNE RD GRANDVIEW FARMS INC P 0 BOX 1304 BURLINGTON VT 1054021 1540-01185 1185 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN, MARILYN 410 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTOP VT 05403 1540-01195 111951 SHELBURNE RD FARRELL, DAVID M TRUSTEE 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01200 1200 SHELBURNE RD WILSON, WILLIAM 1200 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01210 1210 SHELBURNE RD SISTERS & BROTHERS INVESTMENT GROUP LL 75 S WINOOSKI AVE BURLINGTON VT 05401 1540-01230 1230 SHELBURNE RD 1220 SHELBURNE RD CORP 1512 LAKE RD MILTON VT 05468 1540-01233 1233 A SHELBURNE RD TWO O'BRIENS PROPERTIES LLC 1475 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233B 1233 B SHELBURNE RD FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE Bl 50 BURLINGTON VT 1054031 1540-1233E 1233 CO2 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK LN CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 I CO3 SHELBURNE RD W & K PROPERTY LLC 1233 D SHELBURNE RD UNIT#3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 11233 IC1 SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD UNIT C-1 SOUTH BURLINGTOP VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 C2 SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE C2 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 C3 SHELBURNE RD ALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING ST WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233C 1233 C4 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233C 1233 C5 SHELBURNE RD ROCK DUNDER PROPERTIES LLC 1223 SHELBURNE RD #CS S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 DI SHELBURNE RD ADAMS, JOHN S & SUZANNE N 126 WHITE WATER CIRCLE WILLISTON VT 05495 1540-1233D 1233 D4 SHELBURNE RD GREEN & COIL LLC 78 CURTIS AVE BURLINGTON VT 05401 1540-1233D 1233 IDS SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 1233D SHELBURNE RD STE D 613 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D6 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 D7 SHELBURNE RD ARROW TECH ASSOC INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD STE D7 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D8 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233D 1233 D9 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233E 1233 El SHELBURNE RD G & K HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD UNIT E- S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 E3 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK LN CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233E 1233 E4 SHELBURNE RD HILL, MARK D TRUST 1233 SHELBURNE RD E-4 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 ES ISHELBURNE RD LOWREY, RICHARD L SR & SUSAN 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE ES IS BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1540-1233E 1233 1233 E6 ISHELBURNE E7 ISHELBURNE RD RD ALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING ST WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233F 1233 F ISHELBURNE RD I EASTMAN, MARGARET S TRUST 1163 THOMPSONS POINT RD ICHARLOTTE VT 05445 0 2 RabideauArchitects April 14, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for final plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 61 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited under this application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,697 square feet and will feature 60 apartments comprised of 50 one bedroom units and 10 two bedroom units. In addition, there will 17,169 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. We have included 3,250 square feet of restaurant use as a portion of this space. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of the primary roof, 49.25 feet to the top of decorative parapets, and 63 feet to the top of the Tower element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Density: The base residential density for the subject property is 12 dwelling units per acre. The attached plan entitled "DP-1- Density Calculation Site Plan" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Inc. and dated October 28, 2016 shows where in the PUD the density for this phase is drawn from. The density for this phase is drawn from the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road (former Larkin Terrace) and a two acre portion of the lands of Farrell at 1195 Shelburne Road. Housing Affordability: The subject properties are located in the C-1 Auto district. This district has a base density of 12 units per acre that when applied to the 40.8 acres of involved land yields an allowable density of 489.6 dwelling units. To date, 210 units have been built in the Old Orchard Apartments, which leaves 279.6 units of unused residential density. The proposed reconstruction of Larkin Terrace will draw an additional 60 units of base density from this pool. This leaves 213 dwelling units for the remaining phases of the project without the application of any affordable housing bonuses allowed by the LDRs. It is important to the applicant that the specific source of the project density is defined. While this does not bear directly of the requirements of the ordinance, it is important to the partners and /or other parties with a material interest in the PUD. For that purpose we have submitted Civil Engineering Drawing DP-1 prepared by Krebs and Lansing showing where we would derive the density for the current application. 60 units of density at 12 units an acre would impact 5 acres. The applicant expressly defines the acres involved as the original 2.54 acres of the old Larkin Terrace and 2 acres of land at 1195 Shelburne Road. This provides a source of the density without application of any density bonuses or any commercial impact on related parties. The South Burlington Affordable Housing requirements established under Article 18 of the Land Use Regulations only apply in the City Center District at 18-B. Applicability (1) Covered Development: " Except as otherwise provided in this bylaw, the provisions of this section shall apply within the City Center Form Based Codes District..." It is our conclusion that the application to redevelop Larkin Terrace is not subject to the affordable housing requirements of article 18 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations. The applicant has declined to avail themselves of the affordable housing density bonus because there is already ample density available at the base rate. It should be remembered that the existing hotel / apartments at Larkin Terrace are rented at market rates, and that the existing property does not receive federal development funding, nor is it enrolled in any current housing affordability programs requiring rent restrictions. Consistent with the law, the applicant accepts Section 8 Housing vouchers as appropriate at all of their rental properties. The applicant is willing and eager to help the current residents of Larkin Terrace transition to other housing, but does not want to concede to a requirement not established by ordinance. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build -out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. Plans and details of this system are included in the attached engineering drawings. Please note that we are proposing to meet a portion of our required landscaping budget by landscaping the area around this pond. Please refer to the landscaping plan for details. Traffic: A complete traffic analysis prepared by Resource Systems Group is attached. Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current 2.5 acre site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The project as proposed will include the construction of new storm water treatment features that will improve water quality in Bartletts Brook and the greater Lake Champlain water shed by upgrading the storm water system to current standards. Parking: Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. There are 55 parking spaces proposed under the building including one ADA Compliant Accessible parking stall. There are 93 surfaces spaces proposed including 4 ADA compliant spaces. This gives us a total of 148 parking spaces of which 5 meet ADA standards. This application includes a request to amend and existing shared parking program that includes all parking within the subdivision. A detailed report on shared parking and any attendant waiver requests prepared by Resource Systems Group is herby attached. The parking requirements examined in that report include the following impacts: PUD-wide: Maximum demand 646 Available 594 Waiver 8.1% Larkin Terrace Only: Larkin Terrace 195 Avaliable 148 Waiver 24.1% With Shared Parking: Larkin Terrace 153 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Avaliable 148 Waiver 3.0% Fire Protection: We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access.. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. The new structures will be Set Backs and Coverage: We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet on Fayette Road, a waiver of the front yard set -back from Shelburne Road from 30 feet to 18 feet and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. Please refer to Sheet A-999 prepared by Rabideau Architects Inc. and entitled "Street Sections," and last revised April 14, 2017. The applicant further requests permission to include glass canopies in the manner of Church Street in Burlington to provide cover at the entries to the commercial space. These canopies would extend into the requested set -back by 4 feet. In consideration of the relaxed set -back rules, the applicant proposes to step the principal fa4ade back above the Street level by between 2- 4.75 feet. Building Height: The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. The current building site is very flat with an average pre -construction grade of 202.16 feet. We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 45 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 62.75 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Building Materials: The primary exterior material proposed is a standard modular clay masonry face brick. This is accented by cut limestone trim bands and a few rusticated panels. Major openings in the commercial storefronts are trimmed with painted steel portal frames which will add interest and act as lintels to support the masonry. Custom steel frames are also used as a modern reinterpretation of cornice brackets at the top of the building and on all levels of the tower element. Additional materials proposed are cement lap siding and zinc coated shingles 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Storage and Waste Handling: Trash and recycling of wastes will be enclosed in a cut out portion of the building on the south side of the Fayette Road wing. This area will be screened from outside view by a combination of an aluminum fence and coordinated plantings per the enclosed building drawings and landscape plan. An enclosed room at the parking level is provided for bicycle storage at the street level. In addition tenants will have access to chain link enclosures at the rear of the basement parking spaces for the storage of bikes, skis, snow tires and other items. Conclusion: Since preliminary plat approval, the design team has worked to refine and improve the building design. This is a complicated undertaking and we appreciate your patience and insights during the permitting process. On behalf of the entire design team I say "Thank You", and ask that you approve this project. Sincerely, Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com RabideauArchitects April 14, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Final Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for final plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 61 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited under this application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,697 square feet and will feature 60 apartments comprised of 50 one bedroom units and 10 two bedroom units. In addition, there will 17,169 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. We have included 3,250 square feet of restaurant use as a portion of this space. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of the primary roof, 49.25 feet to the top of decorative parapets, and 63 feet to the top of the Tower element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Density: The base residential density for the subject property is 12 dwelling units per acre. The attached plan entitled "DP-1- Density Calculation Site Plan" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Inc. and dated October 28, 2016 shows where in the PUD the density for this phase is drawn from. The density for this phase is drawn from the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road (former Larkin Terrace) and a two acre portion of the lands of Farrell at 1195 Shelburne Road. Housing Affordability: The subject properties are located in the C-1 Auto district. This district has a base density of 12 units per acre that when applied to the 40.8 acres of involved land yields an allowable density of 489.6 dwelling units. To date, 210 units have been built in the Old Orchard Apartments, which leaves 279.6 units of unused residential density. The proposed reconstruction of Larkin Terrace will draw an additional 60 units of base density from this pool. This leaves 213 dwelling units for the remaining phases of the project without the application of any affordable housing bonuses allowed by the LDRs. It is important to the applicant that the specific source of the project density is defined. While this does not bear directly of the requirements of the ordinance, it is important to the partners and /or other parties with a material interest in the PUD. For that purpose we have submitted Civil Engineering Drawing DP-1 prepared by Krebs and Lansing showing where we would derive the density for the current application. 60 units of density at 12 units an acre would impact 5 acres. The applicant expressly defines the acres involved as the original 2.54 acres of the old Larkin Terrace and 2 acres of land at 1195 Shelburne Road. This provides a source of the density without application of any density bonuses or any commercial impact on related parties. The South Burlington Affordable Housing requirements established under Article 18 of the Land Use Regulations only apply in the City Center District at 18-B. Applicability (1) Covered Development: " Except as otherwise provided in this bylaw, the provisions of this section shall apply within the City Center Form Based Codes District..." It is our conclusion that the application to redevelop Larkin Terrace is not subject to the affordable housing requirements of article 18 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations. The applicant has declined to avail themselves of the affordable housing density bonus because there is already ample density available at the base rate. It should be remembered that the existing hotel / apartments at Larkin Terrace are rented at market rates, and that the existing property does not receive federal development funding, nor is it enrolled in any current housing affordability programs requiring rent restrictions. Consistent with the law, the applicant accepts Section 8 Housing vouchers as appropriate at all of their rental properties. The applicant is willing and eager to help the current residents of Larkin Terrace transition to other housing, but does not want to concede to a requirement not established by ordinance. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Arch itects.com Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build -out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. Plans and details of this system are included in the attached engineering drawings. Please note that we are proposing to meet a portion of our required landscaping budget by landscaping the area around this pond. Please refer to the landscaping plan for details. Traffic: A complete traffic analysis prepared by Resource Systems Group is attached. Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current 2.5 acre site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The project as proposed will include the construction of new storm water treatment features that will improve water quality in Bartletts Brook and the greater Lake Champlain water shed by upgrading the storm water system to current standards. Parking: Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. There are 55 parking spaces proposed under the building including one ADA Compliant Accessible parking stall. There are 93 surfaces spaces proposed including 4 ADA compliant spaces. This gives us a total of 148 parking spaces of which 5 meet ADA standards. This application includes a request to amend and existing shared parking program that includes all parking within the subdivision. A detailed report on shared parking and any attendant waiver requests prepared by Resource Systems Group is herby attached. The parking requirements examined in that report include the following impacts: PUD-wide: Maximum demand 646 Available 594 Waiver 8.1% Larkin Terrace Only: Larkin Terrace 195 Avaliable 148 Waiver 24.1% With Shared Parking: Larkin Terrace 153 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Avaliable 148 Waiver 3.0% Fire Protection: We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access.. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. The new structures will be protected throughout with an automatic fire suppression system. Set Backs and Coverage: We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet on Fayette Road, a waiver of the front yard set -back from Shelburne Road from 30 feet to 18 feet and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. Please refer to Sheet A-999 prepared by Rabideau Architects Inc. and entitled "Street Sections," and last revised April 14, 2017. The applicant further requests permission to include glass canopies in the manner of Church Street in Burlington to provide cover at the entries to the commercial space. These canopies would extend into the requested set -back by 4 feet. In consideration of the relaxed set -back rules, the applicant proposes to step the principal facade back above the Street level by between 2- 4.75 feet. Building Height: The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. The current building site is very flat with an average pre -construction grade of 202.16 feet. We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 45 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 62.75 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Building Materials: The primary exterior material proposed is a standard modular clay masonry face brick. This is accented by cut limestone trim bands and a few rusticated panels. Major openings in the commercial storefronts are trimmed with painted steel portal frames which will add interest and act as lintels to support the masonry. Custom steel frames are also used as a modern reinterpretation of cornice brackets at the top of the building and on all levels of the tower element. Additional materials proposed are cement lap siding and zinc coated shingles. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Storage and Waste Handling: Trash and recycling of wastes will be enclosed in a cut out portion of the building on the south side of the Fayette Road wing. This area will be screened from outside view by a combination of an aluminum fence and coordinated plantings per the enclosed building drawings and landscape plan. An enclosed room at the parking level is provided for bicycle storage at the street level. In addition tenants will have access to chain link enclosures at the rear of the basement parking spaces for the storage of bikes, skis, snow tires and other items. Conclusion: Since preliminary plat approval, the design team has worked to refine and improve the building design. This is a complicated undertaking and we appreciate your patience and insights during the permitting process. On behalf of the entire design team I say "Thank You", and ask that you approve this project. Sincerely, Gregory RaodfP,51A Rabide Ar it V 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com E SSG the science of insight 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, VT 05401 802.383.0118 www.rsginc.com REPORT LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 4.14.2017 PREPARED FOR! LARKIN REALTY SUBMITTED BY: RSG MARK SMITH, PE; DAVID GROVER, PE r << n �s LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PREPARED FOR: LARKIN REALTY 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS....................................................................................................... 1 TripGeneration.................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Congestionanalysis........................................................................................................................................................... 1 PUDand Regulatory Restrictions....................................................................................................................................... 1 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................... 4 4.1 Background Traffic Volumes and Adjustments............................................................................. 5 4.2 Other Development Volumes........................................................................................................ 5 4.3 Trip Generation..............................................................................................................................6 4.4 Existing Site Traffic........................................................................................................................ 8 4.5 Scenario Volume Graphics............................................................................................................ 8 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................10 5.1 Level -of -Service Definition........................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Level -of -Service Results.............................................................................................................. 11 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................12 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................12 7.1 Crash Histories............................................................................................................................ 12 7.2 Sight Distance Observations....................................................................................................... 14 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT..........................................................................16 A 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING....................................................................................16 9.1 Vehicle Trips Ends....................................................................................................................... 16 9.2 PUD Parking................................................................................................................................ 17 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................17 10.1 City of South Burlington Road Impact Fees.............................................................................. 18 10.2 City of South Burlington Traffic Overlay District........................................................................ 18 10.3 Act 145 Traffic Impact Fees....................................................................................................... 19 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................19 TripGeneration................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Congestionanalysis......................................................................................................................................................... 20 PUDand Regulatory Restrictions..................................................................................................................................... 20 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA FIGURE 1: PRELIMINARY PROJECT SITE PLAN........................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS...................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 6 FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS.............................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD........................................................................................................................................ 9 FIGURE7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD.............................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD...................................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURE9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD............................................................................................................................................ 10 FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ................................ 11 FIGURE11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE MAXIMUM QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES)............................................................................................ 12 FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY............................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR.............................................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE15: CRASHES BY YEAR.................................................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE16: CRASHES BY TYPE.. ................................................................................................................................................. 14 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD............................................................................................................... 17 FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION......................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS...................................................................... 19 ii April 14, 2017 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS REPLY TO CHRIS CLOW S EMAILED COMMENTS The proposed Larkin Terrace development is located in South Burlington, Vermont on the southwest corner of US-7 and Fayette Road. The development will replace an existing 54-unit apartment -style hotel and will create 60 new apartments, a 3,250-square foot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. Vehicular traffic will access the site from Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of its intersection with US-7. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION After accounting for internal trip capture and transportation demand management, we project the proposed development will generate an additional 42 PM peak hour trip ends compared to the existing vehicle trip generation at the site driveway and a net of 34 new PM peak hour trips on the surrounding roads network, accounting for pass -by trips. CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the development site and the existing plaza across the street (7 Fayette Road) will maintain Level of Service B. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS The project will operate within the parking and trip end limits of the PUD and below the trip threshold of the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the Larkin Terrace development as proposed will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This study evaluates the traffic and related infrastructure impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace project on Fayette Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The site currently contains a 54-unit "all suites" hotel. This building will be removed and replaced with a four-story building that will contain 60 apartments, a 3,250 square -foot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. As shown on the site plan below, the proposed development will have one access point via an existing curb cut on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of the intersection with US-7. IJ Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 1: PROJECT SITE PLAN N Fayette m a c 0 0 a «C,1� This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual,' Trip Generation,2A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Stmets,3 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD),; TraFic Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide,5 and the Vermont State Design ' Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2010). '-Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). 3 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th Edition (Washington DC: AASHTO, 2011). 4 American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA), ITE, and AASHTO, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 Edition (Washington DC: FHWA, 2009). 5 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Tralc Impact Evaluation Study and Review Guide (October 2008). 2 1 April 14, 2017 Standards,6 which are the generally accepted traffic analysis references relied upon by traffic engineering professionals and VTrans for projects of this type in Vermont. VTrans guidelines specify that a traffic study should be considered if the proposed development will generate 75 or more peak hour trips. The geographic scope of the study should include the immediate access points and those intersections or highway segments receiving 75 or more project - generated peak hour trips.? We project that the site driveway will not meet the 75 vehicles per hour trip generation threshold. Therefore, the site driveway is the only intersection assessed for capacity and congestion impacts. The intersection of US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue is part of a high crash location segment, so we examine crashes at this intersection. We also examine the distribution of project related trips at the site driveway and the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection for permitting purposes. 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC The project site is located on Fayette Road. It is a two-lane, local road 40 feet wide at the site driveway and posted at 25 miles per hour. It connects US-7 (Shelburne Road) to the east with Hannafords Drive to the north. The road is unstriped until lane markings begin at the intersection with US-7 and leading up to Hannafords Drive. Across from the project driveway is a plaza (7 Fayette Road) containing a bank (Citizens Bank), a fast food restaurant (McDonalds), an urgent care facility (Concentra), a sit-down restaurant (Zen Gardens), a gym (Artemis Fitness), and a vacant store front that had been a categorized as a tavern (formerly Tilt). The traffic volumes associated with 7 Fayette Road are discussed below. The project is part of the L&M Park planned unit development (PUD) that includes 7 Fayette Road, a 1,000-seat cinema (Palace 9) and 210 residential units on Olde Orchard Park to the west. The section of US-7 proximate to Fayette Road is a five -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane) with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. In 2015, VTrans recorded an annual average daily traffic volume (AADT) of 31,130 vehicles per day along US-7 at station D577, approximately 0.4 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road intersection. Count data collected by VTrans in June of 2016 indicate the highest traffic volumes along US-7 occur during the weekday PM peak hours. Traffic impacts during this period are examined in this study. Since background traffic in the project area and trip generation is greater during the PM period than in the AM, operational findings for the PM peak hour will be the same or less favorable than findings for the AM peak hour. Figure 2 shows the project location and study area intersections. 6 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation, Vermont State Standards (Nlontpelier: VTrans, 1 July 1997). 7 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Tralc Impact Evaluation Study and Review Guide Qanuary 2003). E13 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 2: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS This section of US-7 was the subject of the 2012 report "Shelburne Road Corridor Study" prepared for the City of South Burlington and the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission and prepared by Parsons Brinkerhoff. This study found that level of service was generally good at the US-7 intersections close to the project site. 4.0 ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES This analysis examines design hour vehicle delays and queues at the site driveway and projects trip distribution at the following two intersections: 1. Site Driveway/Fayette Road 2. US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue (trip distribution only) Vehicle delays and queues are examined first with baseline, No Build scenario, traffic volumes, which represent the anticipated design hour conditions in the target study years without the proposed development in place. Once baseline conditions are established, anticipated traffic associated with the proposed development is added to the No Build scenario volumes to create Build scenario traffic volumes, which are in turn used to project intersection delays and levels of service with the proposed development in place. 4 1 April 14, 2017 E I A detailed description of the elements that contribute to the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes is presented below. 4.1 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS RSG obtained the most recent VTrans turning movement count data at the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection (counted on June 30, 2016). This count data was used to establish background volumes at the site driveway. Trip Generation was used to establish turning movements at the site driveway and at the 7 Fayette Road driveway across the street. Following VTrans traffic study guidelines, raw peak hour traffic volumes were adjusted to represent the design hour volume (DHV)8 in 2017 and 20229 using two adjustment factors: 1. Design hour adjustment factors are based on VTrans count station D577, which is located along US-7 in South Burlington, VT, just south of the intersection with IDX Drive. The 2015 DHV at this station was compared to the peak hour volumes at the intersection of US- 7/1-lolmes Road/IDX Drive on the date of the turning movement count to formulate DHV adjustments. This intersection is 0.3 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection and both intersections were counted on the same day. DHV adjustments decreased raw count volumes by 4%. 2. An annual adjustment factor representing general background traffic growth is based on historic count data at VTrans count station D577. From 2010 to 2015, AADT changed from 29,300 to 31,130 vehicles per day, or 1% per year. An adjustment factor of 2% was applied to the DHV adjusted counts to grow the traffic from 2015 to 2017. Traffic volumes on US-7 are expected to grow by 5% from the 2017 base year condition to the 2022 future year condition. 4.2 1 OTHER DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES Other development volumes (ODVs) represent trips generated by anticipated developments in the study area. Trips generated by ODVs are included in every scenario (both No Build and Build) because we assume they are already present on the road network in the analysis years. Through discussion with South Burlington Planning and Zoning staff, the following ODV was identified for inclusion in this study: 65 apartments are planned along Green Mountain Drive, approximately 0.6 miles south of the Fayette Road intersection with US-7. Per Trip Generation, this development is expected to generate 40 trips. Based on the 2016 turning movements at the US-7/Green Mountain Drive intersection, half of these trips travel through the US-7/Fayette Road Intersection, and 2 trips from this development will pass by the project site driveway. No formal traffic study was conducted for this intersection. s The DHV is the 30th highest hour of traffic for the year and is used as the design standard in Vermont. 9 VTrans requires analysis during the year project construction is expected to be complete and in a future year scenario 5 years after project completion. CIS Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 4.3 1 TRIP GENERATION Trip generation refers to the number of vehicle trips originating at or destined for a particular development. Trip generation was used to determine the number of trips currently created by the existing Larkin Terrace (54 apartment -style hotel rooms) as well as the rest of the PUD and the traffic generated by the proposed Larkin Terrace development, which will consist of apartment residents, retail store patrons, and restaurant patrons. To estimate the number of new vehicle trips for the Larkin Terrace development, we examined trip generation rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation.10 applying trip generation rates for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 220 (apartment), LUC 826 (Specialty Retail Center), and LUC 932 (High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant), we calculate the proposed expansion will generate 92 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour (see Figure 3). FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Projected PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Total Enter Exit Apartments (LUC 220, 60 units) 24 13 37 Specialty Retail Center (LUC 826,17,097 sq ft) 20 26 46 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (LUC 932, 3,250sq ft) 19 13 32 Total 63 52 115 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 24 24 39 28 115 _T Primary Pass -By Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 34 25 5 3 67 6%TDM Primary Trip Reduction* 2 1 0 0 3 Total Development Trips 32 24 5 3 64 Existing trips 10 12 0 0 22 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 22 12 5 3 42 *"TDM Guidance" VTra ns, 2016. (Bus stop with shelter, Transit/walk access site design, Bicycle racks, 6% max) This development consists of several different types of uses, allowing trips originating from one land use to be destined for another land use within the development. For example, an apartment resident may walk to the onsite retail stores, or a restaurant patron may go home to an apartment. These trips are said to be captured internally and are not counted towards the number of trips generated by the development on the adjacent transportation network. We used the NCHRP Report 684 Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation forMixed--Use Developments" to calculate a 42% reduction in trips due to internal capture (48 trips). Internal capture calculations are included in the Appendix. External site generated traffic can be differentiated between primary and pass -by trips. While primary trips represent people who leave their home, place of work, or other origin expressly to visit the site "0 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). it Bochner, Brian S., Kevin Hooper, Benjamin Sperry, and Robert Dunphy. Enhancing Internal Trip CaPtum EstimationforMixee/ Use Developments (Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research board — National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2011). 6 April 14, 2017 FR J J and who would not otherwise have gotten into their vehicle to make a trip, pass -by trips represent vehicles that currently pass by the site on the local road network and who, when the proposed development is present, turn into the site on their way to another destination. Pass -by trips are converted from through movements to turning movements to and from the site at the development access points but do not add new trips to intersections beyond the site access. The percentage of trips that are considered pass -by is based on Trip Generation. Transportation demand management (TDM) is the practice of reducing the number of trips during peak hour travel times by providing alternative travel means (discussed in further detail later in this study). Physical TDM measures include being located near a bus stop with a shelter, having access to and providing continuity of sidewalks and transit near building entrances, and providing accommodations for bike storage on site (e.g. bicycle racks). These TDM accommodations can facilitate up to a 6% reduction in external vehicle trip generations' (the maximum allowed for only physical TDM measures). Pass -by traffic is typically assumed to come from vehicles passing by the site on an immediately adjacent roadway to which the site directly accesses. However, due to the relatively low volume of through traffic along Fayette Road in the vicinity of the site and the relatively high volume of traffic on US-7, we have assumed the pass -by portion of trip generation will come from US-7 through trips at its intersection with Fayette Road. Due to the nature of the project, the percentage of pass -by trips will vary by land use, and, according to Trip Generation, will be approximately 10% of site generated traffic. The site currently contains a 54-room apartment style hotel which, according to Trip Generation, currently generates 10 and 12 entering and exiting trips respectively during the PM peak hour. These 22 trips are subtracted from the development traffic to find the net number of trips that this development will add to the surrounding road network. Figure 3 presents the projected trip generation, broken out into total trips, internal capture, primary traffic, TDM reduction, and pass -by traffic. Figure 4 presents a map of the estimated distribution of project -generated trips. Net primary and pass -by trips entering and exiting the site access are distributed onto the roadway network based on background traffic volumes. As discussed above, the reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection is due to pass -by traffic and corresponds with an increase in turns into and out of Fayette Road as vehicles that previously passed by the site divert into the site once the development is complete. 12 Vermont Agency of Transportation. MM Guidance. 2016. Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 4: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS 7 Fayette US-7 0 0 0 5 -2 0 J l L 0 R- 0 2 J 0 > o Q F; 0 f- 0 0 -► 1 r_ 0 9 Ir 18 6 -I Ir 0ro c t �0 V, t r 7 0 8 12 -2 0 Site Driveway US-7 4.4 1 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC The existing 54-unit apartment -style hotels generates 22 trips during the PM peak hour. This building would be replaced by the proposed development. Traffic volumes estimated at the site driveway intersection under No Build conditions include these 22 trips as well as trips coming from and going to the plaza across Fayette Road. Due to a vacant unit, the total number of trips associated with the plaza driveway were estimated from Trip Generation assuming full occupancy. Figure 5 shows trips associated with these land uses. Building sizes were taken from the December 23, 2013 parking study by conducted by Lamoureux and Dickinson on behalf of Jim Carroll and the permitting associated with Tilt in 7 Fayette Road. FIGURE 5: EXISTING TRIPS FROM 7 FAYETTE ROAD l xistingF.na,y i•1sI� Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 5 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 FormerlyTilt(Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Total 4.5 1 SCENARIO VOLUME GRAPHICS 306 Figure 6 through Figure 9 present the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes at the two study area intersections in the build year (2017) and the future year (2022). No Build traffic volumes include the raw count volumes, adjusted to design hour conditions, and projected traffic from a recently permitted development in the area (ODV). Build scenario volumes represent the addition of project -generated traffic (both primary and pass -by trips) to the No Build traffic volumes. 8 1 April 14, 2017 \Vith the addition of project -generated traffic, volumes entering and exiting the project site increase in the Build scenario and these trips are carried out through the US-7 intersection. The reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection in the Build scenario is due to the increase in pass -by traffic as described in the Trip Generation discussion above. These trips previously passed by Fayette Road in the No Build scenario but turn into and out of the site once the project is in place. FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 Fayette 85 0 57 At ♦ 'A US-7 52 1230 22 65 J *6 98 41 J 18 0 Q °; 114 ♦ 4— 158 7 -► ♦ 10 N v o 4 6 127 21 ro 7 0 5 201 1245 16 Site Driveway US-7 FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD 7 Fayette US-7 85 0 57 57 1228 22 ♦ ti A ♦ ti Cu v c 65 98 43 - 18 > o Q a, 114 -+ ♦- 158 7 -+ f- 11 N 13 24 133 21ro c 14 0 13 213 1243 16 Site Driveway US-7 9 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD 7 FayettE 90 0 a, 69 0 }; 119 -► Gj v 4 -y U_ V1 7 US-7 60 54 1291 L A 4- 103 43 -� 4- 166 7 -0- 6 134 0 5 210 1307 Site Driveway FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD 7 Fayette 90 0 v 69 -0 0 a; 119 -► W v � 13 14 US-7 US-7 60 59 1289 L A? 0- 103 45 -0 4- 166 7 -1� r 24 140 n, t FV1 t 0 13 222 1305 Site Driveway 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE DEFINITION US-7 24 L a c 06 18 > Q ♦ 10 N 0 r 22 c 17 24 L a, D r= 18 > Q 4- 11 0 �- 22 c u 17 Level -of -service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. LOS is calculated using the procedures outlined in the 2000 and 2010 Highway Capacity Manuals.13 In addition to traffic volumes, key inputs include the number of lanes at each intersection, traffic control type (signalized or unsignalized), and the traffic signal tinting plans. 13 The HC1\1 2010 does not provide methodologies for calculating intersection delays at certain intersection types including signalized intersections with exclusive pedestrian phases and signalized intersections with non NEDLA,-standard phasing. Because of these limitations, HCM 2000 methodologies are employed where necessary. 10 1 April 14, 2017 The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual defines six qualitative grades to describe the level of service at an intersection. Level -of -Service is based on the average control delay per vehicle. Figure 10 shows the various LOS grades and descriptions for signalized and unsignalized intersections. FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The delay thresholds for LOS at signalized and unsignalized intersections differ because of the driver's expectations of the operating efficiency for the respective traffic control conditions. According to HCM procedures, an overall LOS cannot be calculated for two-way stop -controlled intersections because not all movements experience delay. In signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections, all movements experience delay and an overall LOS can be calculated. The Wrans policy on level of service is: • Overall LOS C should be maintained for state -maintained highways and other streets accessing the state's facilities • Reduced LOS may be acceptable on a case -by -case basis when considering, at minimum, current and future traffic volumes, delays, volume to capacity ratios, crash rates, and negative impacts as a result of improvement necessary to achieve LOS C. • LOS D should be maintained for side roads with volumes exceeding 100 vehicles/hour for a single lane approach (150 vehicles/hour for a two-lane approach) at two-way stop -controlled intersections. Detailed Synchro LOS worksheets are available in the Appendix. 5.2 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS The Highway Capacity Manual congestion reports within Synchro (0), a traffic analysis software package from Trafficware, routinely relied upon by transportation engineering professionals, were used to assess traffic congestion at the site driveway. During the weekday PM peak hour approach delays on Fayette Road at the site driveway are projected to remain essentially unchanged and remain at LOS A with the addition of project generated traffic in both 2017 and 2022. Delays at the project driveway and 7 Fayette are projected to remain at LOS B. Figure 11 presents the LOS results during the weekday PM peak hour. 0 11 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS 2017 No Build PM Peak 2017 Build Hour 2022 No Build 2022 Build LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c (21 Fayette Rd / Project Drive Overall EB, along Fayette Dr A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 WB, along Fayette Dr A 0 A <1 A <1 A <1 NB, exiting Site Drive B 12 B 12 B 12 B 12 SB, exiting 7 Fayette� B 12 B 13 B 13 B 13 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the congestion analysis, estimated average maximum queues were evaluated using SimTraffic.14 Queues at the Fayette Road/Project driveway intersection are projected to remain virtually unchanged with the addition of project generated traffic (Figure 12). Detailed SimTraffic queuing worksheets are available in the Appendix. FIGURE 12: AVERAGE MAXIMUM QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES) PM Peak Hour 2017 2020 No Build No Build Fayette Rd / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr 2 1 1 2 WB, along Fayette Dr 0 1 0 1 NB, exiting Site Drive 1 1 1 1 SB, exiting 7 Fayette 3 2 2 3 TO SAFETY ANALYSIS 7.1 1 CRASH HISTORIES VTrans maintains a statewide database of all reported crashes along all state highways and federal aid road segments.15 Crash histories were collected from the VTrans Public Crash Data Query Too116 for the 5-year period associated with the most recent VTrans High Crash Location Report17 Qanuary 2010-December 2014). Within this 5-year period, one crash occurred within design stopping sight distance (155 feet at 25 miles per hour) of the site access point. This crash was from a left turn out of the plaza driveway across from the site access. The US-7/Fayette Road/McIntosh Avenue intersection is part of a designated VTrans High Crash Location (HCL) segment, which means the actual crash rate observed over the past five years is higher than comparable segments across the state with similar functional classification and traffic 14 Ten hour-long simulations were averaged together to estimate queue lengths. As each run is different, a difference in a few cars should not be seen as significant. 11 This data is exempt from Discovery or Admission under 23 U.S.C. 409. 16 http://apps.vtrans.vermont.gov/CrashPubhcQuefyTool/ 11 http://vtrans.vermont.gov/sites/aot/files/planning/2010- 2014%20Formal%20High%20Crash%20Locadon%20Report.pdf 12 April 14, 2017 6 0 levels. Since some traffic from this development will proceed through this intersection, we examined crashes on US-7 within the stopping sight distance (250 feet at 35 miles per hour) of the intersection. One injury and one fatality resulted from the 47 crashes at this intersection. This section is ranked 551 out of 647 sections (lower numbers are more severe). As indicated in Figure 13, crashes in this area occur most frequently when there is more traffic on the roads during the later half of the day. Crashes are more prevalent in the second half of the year although there is no clear correlation between crashes and time of year (Figure 14). The five-year trend does not show any significant change in crash rate over the past five years of available data (Figure 15). FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY 8 7 L ca 6 t� 5 0 4 .0 3 Z 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a a a n a c a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 S o o a 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N e-i N M V Il'1 ID t, W Qi O 1-1 N e-i N M et 6'1 0 i' W Ql O rl Time of Day FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR 9 8 Ln v 7 L 6 w 5 0 4 E 3 Z z 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Month Sep Oct Nov Dec AE Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY YEAR 1 10 8 v` `o 6 v E 4 D z 2 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year About half the crashes are rear end crashes, which indicates that congestion is the major issue driving crashes at this location (Figure 16). No mitigation is recommended in connection with this development. FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE Ln 30 _ Lw 25 @ 20 u 15 0 10 5 n 0 z QaaO� e'�\Q� J�r\`� o a�\a2 ae gear O`re`\P �.a a 5a w �QP" Crash Type 7.2 1 SIGHT DISTANCE OBSERVATIONS As defined in the 2011 publication A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, from the American .association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), sight distance is the "the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver."ls Sight distances of sufficient length are necessary at all points along a roadway to ensure vehicles can safely stop or avoid colliding with potential obstructions or other vehicles on the roadway. is American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-2. 14 1 April 14, 2017 ;* Standard practice in assessing intersection safety and operations involves measuring two separate sight distances — stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance. In this section, we examine sight distances at the site driveway on Fayette Road. Stopping sight distance is the visible distance along a roadway between an advancing motorist and a potential obstacle in the roadway. It is measured from a point representing the approaching driver's eye and a point representing an obstacle in the roadway. Stopping sight distances of adequate length are needed along all roadways, both at and away from intersections, so that drivers travelling at design speeds can react to potential obstacles and safely brake to avoid collisions. Design minimum stopping sight distances are calculated based on factors such as design speed, response times, and grades as reported in the 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Strrets.19 Intersection sight distance is the distance available along the major road travelled way corresponding with the maximum visibility between an advancing motorist on the major road and an entering motorist on an intersecting minor road. It is measured between a point representing the advancing driver's eye above the major road and the entering driver's eye above the intersecting road. The 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets states that the available intersection sight distance should be at least equal to the required stopping sight distance along the major road, which in this case equals 155 feet. "Sight distance is also provided at intersections to allow the drivers of stopped vehicles a sufficient thew of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter the intersecting highway or to crvss it. If the available sight distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major road, then drivers have sufficient sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. "2D However, when possible it is desirable to have intersection sight distances that exceed the design minimum stopping sight distances in order to offer improved operations, such that major road traffic need not decelerate to accommodate entering traffic. "Howexr, in some cases a major -mad vehicle may need to stop or slow to accommodate the maneuver by a minor road vehicle. To enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are desirable along the major road "=' Based on the posted speed limit of 25 mph for Fayette Road, the design minimum stopping sight distance and intersection sight distances is 155 feet and the ideal target intersection sight distance is 280 feet. On October 19, 2016, RSG staff observed sight distances at the site driveway and along Fayette Road, and found both stopping and intersection sight distances to exceed these standards to the south. The distance between the site driveway and Fayette Road's intersection with US-7 to the 19 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-5. 20 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highwgvs and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 21 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Poky on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 MEI15 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study north is less than the intersection sight distance for vehicles turning right out of the site driveway, and vehicles can see clear to the intersection. 8.0 TRANSPORTV-- - r " �-ID MANAGEMENT Recent VTrans guidance''-- defines Transportation Demand Management (TDM) as "a broad set of strategies that strive to either reduce or reallocate automobile travel to achieve benefits such as reduced roadway congestion, improved air quality, reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, reduced parking demand, improved public health for those biking or walking, and reduced commuting and travel costs." This guidance suggests several measures and combinations of measures for TDM that help reduce trip generation from new developments. Specifically, these reductions are applied to the expected trip rates computed from Trip Generation as a percentage. Relevant measures proposed by the Larkin Terrace development fall into the Physical category, and include: - Project location in a mixed use urban area, and on a moderate service transit line (headways of 30 minutes or less) - A bus stop with a shelter within 600 ft. of the project entrance. - Bicycle racks located conveniently on -site - A site design with connections to adjacent sidewalks and transit stop(s) Per the VTrans methodology, each measure has a percent trip reduction associated with it. The aggregate for this development exceeds the maximum allowed of 6%; thus a 6% reduction was applied. 9.0 PUD LIMITS: TRIP ENDS AND PARKING The L&M Park PUD limits the number of vehicle trips ends (VTE) associated with the PUD and allows for shared parking between the different uses in the PUD. This section demonstrates that the proposed project will not exceed the restrictions associated with the PUD. 9.1 ( VEHICLE TRIPS ENDS Per the L&M PUD agreement, the number of WE associated with the PUD is limited to 623 total trips. Figure 17 shows 549 WE will be associated with the proposed development and the other existing land uses in the PUD. This number does not account for internal capture between different land uses, only internal capture within Larkin Terrace Development The WE would be fewer if internal capture were accounted for. These 549 WE is below the 623 limit. A May 6, 2008 study of the PUD by Clough Harbor & Associates found a significantly higher number of WE associated with the PUD. Since that time, the trip generation rate associated with some of the land uses, LUC 912 (Drive -In Bank) in particular, has decreased, which resulted in an overall lower number of WE associated with the PUD. 77 March 2016, Transportation Demand Management (IDM) Guidance, VTrans Policy & Planning 16 April 14, 2017 FIGURE 17: PROPOSED VEHICLE TRIP ENDS IN PUD Larkin Terrace Developmer Varies, see Figure 3 37 27 64 Zen Gardens 931 7128 SF 36 18 53 Artemis Fitness 492 3564 SF 7 5 13 Concentra 720 8586 SF 9 22 31 Formerly Tilt (Tavern) 925 2677 SF 20 10 30 McDonalds 934 3500 SF 59 55 114 Citizens Bank 912 2644 SF 32 32 64 Olde Orchard Park 230 210 Units 73 36 109 Palace 9 Movie Theater 444 1000 Seats 27 43 70 Total 549 9.2 1 PUD PARKING A 2013 parking study by Lamoureux and Dickenson determined that 490 parking spaces currently exist within the limits of the PUD. The proposed project will remove 44 parking spaces as part of the removal of the existing Larkin Terrace buildings and will install 148 new spaces (55 garage spaces and 93 surface spaces) as part of the new development. This represents a net increase of 104 spaces within the PUD. The PUD-wide parking plan from the 2013 parking study and the projects' site plan showing parking are included in the Appendix. The South Burlington 2016 Land Development Regulations (LDR) prescribe the minimum number of parking spaces a land use is required to have available. In cases where multiples uses are present and those uses will have different peak parking needs, they allow for shared parking. This study examined parking demand at different times of day and different times of year23 to determined that the overall peak parking demand for the PUD will occur 8-10 pm on a weekday between Christmas Day and New Yeaes Day (see Appendix for a matrix of shared parking demand calculations). It was found that 646 parking spaces will be required at the peak time. After the improvements associated with the Larkin Terrace Development, there will be 594 spaces available. A waiver of up to 25% is available to the PUD, but only an 8% waiver will be required: (646-594)/646 = 8.1%. 10.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The Larkin Terrace development is potentially subject to two separate Traffic Impact Fees from the City of South Burlington and Act 145. The project also has trips that enter an intersection within South Burlington's Transportation Overlay District. This section provides sufficient information to calculate relevant fees and demonstrates that the development is in compliance with the current regulations. 23 Hourly and monthly adjustment factors were taken from the Urban Land Institute's Sharked Parking, Second Edition, 2005. Their methodology was used to calculate share parking demands. 2 1 17 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 10.1 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ROAD IMPACT FEES This City Impact Fee Ordinance levies a Road Improvement Impact Fee for residential developments that increase the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential developments that increase the number of PM peak hour trips. Figure 18 shows the number of new development units and trips associated with the Larkin Terrace project. The number of multi -family dwelling units is the number of new units minus the number of existing units which will be removed. The number of non-residential PM peak hour trips includes reductions for internal capture and TDM measures. FIGURE 18: ROAD IMPACT FEE INFORMATION '... Impact Net Single Family Dwelling (Units) 6 Net Multi -Family Dwelling (Units) 0 Non -Residential PM Peak Hour (Trips)* 40 *Includes reductions for internal capture and TDM 10.2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON TRAFFIC OVERLAY DISTRICT South Burlington restricts traffic from developments that used roadways within its Traffic Overlay District. This parcel is in Traffic Overlay Zone 2C (access to a high -volume roadway via a public roadway or a private driveway with a roundabout or a signalized intersection) and therefore has a budget of 0.75 trips per 1,000 square feet (ks fl'-;. The PUD generates a total of 549 trips (Figure 17). The project encompasses two property areas: the PUD (1,460 ksf) and 1195 Shelburne Road (95 ks�. As shown in Figure 19, the project is limited to a maximum of 1,166 trips accessing the US-7/Fayette Road intersection (Figure 19). FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY Parcel • PUD Land 2C 0.75 1,460 1,095 1195 Shelburne Road 2C 0.75 95 71 Total 1,166 *Trips/ksf, based on 30trips per40,000sf The 1,166-trip budget relates to the total number of trips generated by the site that accesses the high - volume roadway regardless of existing trips. Therefore, existing trips are not considered. However, not all of the 549 trips generated by the PUD access US-7, so not all of these should count against the trip budget. Since the number of trips generated by the PUD (549) is significantly less than the total trips allowed to access US-7 (1,166), it is clear that the PUD trip generation is less than the trips budget allowed by this TOD, and it is not necessary to account for PUD trips that do not access US- 7. '-; South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 2016. 10 fl, p 179, 30 trips per 40,000 square feet 18 1 April 14, 2017 E 10.3 1 ACT 145 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Act 145 requires new developments to pay part of the costs of VTrans funded transportation improvements that their trips will impact. Although there are currently no VTrans funded improvements in the projeces immediate vicinity, we understand VTrans' policy is to look at the trip distribution and determine if any trips may travel through a location of planned improvements. Figure 20 summarizes the distribution of the 34 new trips to/from surrounding areas. Note that pass -by trips are not included in this summary as they are not new trips to the network. FIGURE 20: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS 11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RSG has conducted an analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace development located in South Burlington, Vermont. The proposed development would be 60 apartments, a 3,250-squarefoot restaurant, and 17,097 square feet of retail space. The project would replace an existing 54-unit apartment -style hotel. The site entrance and exit will be on Fayette Road approximately 200 feet west of US-7 and aligned opposite an existing plaza access. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION We project the proposed development will generate approximately 42 net trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Of this total, we project that 8 trips will be pass -by trips (vehicles already passing by the site on US-7) meaning the development with add 34 trips to the surrounding roads network. 0I19 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Road will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project Access driveways for both the site and 7 Fayette across the street will maintain LOS B. PUD AND REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS With the additional of project related traffic, the PUD trip generation will be within the trip limits of both the PUD and the South Burlington Traffic Overlay District. Parking for the PUD will require an 8% waiver. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the proposed Larkin Terrace development will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. 20 April 14, 2017 E APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS =.O 0 (,..a PUFOW3 PLPPsetll p1m. RIO. ON ..w *1 -,=)dl. uup O—q dVL P1.8 ON 0 1L1 APPENDIX B. INTERNAL CAPTURE NCHRP 8-51 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool Project Name: Organization: Project Location: Performed By: Scenario Description: Date: Analysis Year: Checked By: Analysis Period: PM Street Peak Hour Date: Table 1-P: Base Vehicle -Trip Generation Estimates (Single -Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only) Estimated Vehicle -Trips ITE LUCs' Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 46 20 26 Restaurant 32 19 13 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 37 24 13 Hotel 0 All Other Land Uses2 0 Total 115 63 52 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Veh. Occ. % Transit % Non -Motorized Veh. Occ. % Transit % Non -Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses2 Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail 600 Restaurant 600 Cinema/Entertainment Residential 600 600 Hotel Table 4-P: Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix* Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 6 0 7 0 Restaurant 0 5 0 2 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Total Entering Exiting All Person -Trips 115 63 52 Internal Capture Percentage 42% 38% 46% External Vehicle-TriPS3 67 39 28 External Transit-Tri s° 0 0 0 External Non -Motorized Tripe 0 0 0 Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips Office N/A N/A Retail 35% 50% Restaurant 42% 54% Cinema/Entertainment N/A NIA Residential 38% 31 Hotel N/A N/A Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Informational Report, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator "Vehicle -trips computed using the modes lit and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P °Person -Trips *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas Transportation Institute Project Name: 0 Analysis Period:j PM Street Peak Hour Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle -Trip Ends to Person -Trip Ends Land Use Table 7-P (D): Entering Trips Table 7-P (0): Exiting Trips Veh.Occ. Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips` Veh.Occ. Vehicle -Trips Person -Trips' Office 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Retail 1.00 20 20 1.00 26 26 Restaurant 1.00 19 19 1.00 13 13 Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0 Residential 1.00 24 24 1.00 13 13 Hotel 1.00 1 0 0 1.00 0 0 Table 8-P (0): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Origin Destination (To) (From) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 1 8 1 7 1 Restaurant 0 5 1 2 1 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 1 5 2 0 0 Hotel i 0 0 0 0 0 Table 8-P (D): Internal Person -Trip Origin -Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin (From) Destination (To) Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office 2 0 0 1 0 Retail 0 6 0 11 0 Restaurant 0 10 0 4 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 1 1 1 0 Residential 0 2 2 0 0 Hotel 0 0 i 1 i 0 0 Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Destination Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode" Internal External Total Vehicles' Transit' Non -Motorized' Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 7 13 20 13 0 0 Restaurant 8 11 19 11 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 9 15 24 15 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 9-P (0): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Origin Land Use Person -Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode' Internal External Total Vehicles' Transit' Non -Motorized' Office 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 13 13 26 13 0 0 Restaurant 7 6 13 6 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 4 9 13 9 0 0 Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Land Uses' 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Vehicle -trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P 'Person -Trips 'Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed -use development site -not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator 'Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 04/14/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +T+ +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 114 4 6 158 98 7 0 5 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 114 4 6 158 98 7 0 5 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 114 4 6 158 98 7 0 5 57 0 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 118 0 0 508 514 116 468 467 207 Stage - - - - - - 246 246 - 219 219 - Stage 2 - - 262 268 - 249 248 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6 1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2,2 15 4 33 3 5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1483 479 467 942 509 496 839 Stage 1 - - 762 706 - 788 726 - Stage 2 - - 747 691 - 759 705 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1483 411 440 942 484 467 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 411 440 - 484 467 - Stage 1 722 669 746 722 Stage 2 668 688 715 668 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 11.9 12.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 537 1321 1483 648 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.049 0 004 - 0.219 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.9 7.9 0 7.4 0 12.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - 0 - 0.8 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 04/14/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 4 +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 114 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Future Vol, veh/h 65 114 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 65 114 13 24 158 98 14 0 13 57 0 85 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 127 0 0 549 555 121 512 512 207 Stage 1 - - - - - - 251 251 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - 298 304 - 257 257 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1472 450 443 936 476 468 839 Stage - - 758 703 - 754 700 - Stage 2 - - 715 667 - 752 699 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1321 1472 382 412 936 444 435 839 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 382 412 - 444 435 - Stage 1 718 666 714 687 Stage 2 630 654 702 662 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.6 12.1 12.6 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 534 1321 1472 618 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.049 0.016 0.23 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.9 0 7.5 0 12.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - 0.1 - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 04/14/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� +T+ +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 6 166 103 7 0 5 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 4 6 166 103 7 0 5 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 4 6 166 103 7 0 5 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 123 0 0 534 540 121 492 491 218 Stage 1 - - - - - - 259 259 - 230 230 - Stage 2 - - 275 281 - 262 261 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2,2 15 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1477 - 460 451 936 490 481 827 Stage - - 750 697 - 777 718 - Stage 2 - - 736 682 - 747 696 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1477 391 423 936 464 451 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 391 423 - 464 451 - Stage 1 707 657 733 714 Stage 2 653 679 701 656 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.8 0.2 12.1 12.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 516 1306 1477 630 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.053 0 004 0 238 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 7.9 0 7.4 0 12.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 - 0 - 0.9 Larkin Terrace 5W pm 11/02/2016 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd 04/14/2017 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 45 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ *14 4 +1;4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Future Vol, veh/h 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 69 119 13 24 166 103 14 0 13 60 0 90 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 132 0 0 575 581 126 536 536 218 Stage - - - - - - 264 264 - 266 266 - Stage 2 - - 311 317 - 270 270 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1466 - 432 428 930 459 454 827 Stage 1 - - 746 694 - 744 692 - Stage 2 - - - 704 658 - 740 690 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1466 363 396 930 426 420 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 363 396 - 426 420 - Stage 1 - - - 703 654 702 678 Stage 2 615 645 688 651 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.7 0.6 12.4 13 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1306 1466 601 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.053 0.016 0.25 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.9 0 - 7.5 0 13 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.2 - - 0.1 - 1 Larkin Terrace 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report RSG Page 1 APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM No Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 18 63 Average Queue (ft) 18 7 45 95th Queue (ft) 47 28 69 Link Distance (ft) 542 196 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Su Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 04/14/2017 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 16 31 60 Average Queue (ft) 15 3 12 46 95th Queue (ft) 43 18 36 67 Link Distance (ft) 542 259 196 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 04/14/2017 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM No Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 18 60 Average Queue (ft) 17 7 43 95th Queue (ft) 44 28 65 Link Distance (ft) 542 196 205 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Su Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 04/14/2017 Larkin Terrace SimTraffc Report RSG Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM Build 04/14/2017 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/7 Fayette & Fayette Rd Movement EB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 45 16 31 70 20 3 14 48 53 18 39 75 542 259 196 205 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report RSG Page 1 APPENDIX E. PARKING DATA r _ � eeNan ute_ �. — TcArs� ;�.i � a•:R m..� � N � ,� I now ru�etA of v.KK«c sn.ns nwmaw ..w awm a>,rm. eutonc) - uienw Sntc[S �✓sw.ul 4 _ '� C rii . Y z 4 �y I .uuire auuv \a- PABUNCD nE EATH � � ® 7 FAYETTE ROAD �7• :u,Nn c*>oa KNumn I I rt�t 1 f LEI _ m HillI REMOVE 44 1•ET InP.) X �p- EXISTING SPACES :tom Q SKEltM/CONGER ,.w •MI O PIIFLMINPIR kt kt[pR0 bRAW[NG +' ' 7 FAY=F ROAD PUD a 90 D aoura eua mmif, yr OVERALL SITE PLAN .LL owuaae NR .w�aA..-�.H c�� ��w�tm nii�n • co�l� c� oKmc..�r <. a. r, uwK. viau�tn, nr u.. ww<...�.w �i•--= n.r a :amw n ullootavi • Grt'Im1YaDt �r P,Rww Ino.cwo K;tbcw-.s ,� eIII ` :ienN +- w`IOC ..0 wR.. � ceRtux� �e.n 7x. � �'-e0• uK - resr ��.. �awu u.rhrtsrr >wac �.. r mivirnu uw wrm .uc. ew, uc •vt +...,. �. °;.n uK nw., wowt Rs vwr DKM-n; n mvmex �.�.,� im=i em-•.� KOiiORaED lM1LD �WQ 1riD. E:y11Re[1-Hmeen-9m..fetY 1 PUD PARKING SPACES a FROM 2013 PARKING STUDY BY LAMOUREUX AND DICKENSON I s' C c cZ M PROPOSED LARKIN TERRACE PARKING SPACES ■o. iii I I I I I I I •i■■■��■■■■i-i�l�l 0 0 8 -44 - ® Imo_ 0 5 -36 FMM I I -' 1 I I. --.I I I I I I I uiva oc rar WAGNER DRAFT LARKIN TERRACE PARKING CHANGES �A� ENE REASIO 5 WB '.p` o1L1.0 un Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Summer (July) Winter (Late December) Summer(luly) Winter (Late December) Size Unit Space Ratio Weekday 4.6 pm Peak Weekday4.6 pm Peak Weekday 8.10 pm Peak Weekday 8.10 Peak Saturday 8-10 PM Saturday 8-10 PM 1. Palace 9 Cinema 1000 Seats 0.33 330 Spaces 330 330 Space, 330 Spaces 330 Spam, 330 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 60% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 55% 100%, 55% 100% 92% 100% Peak N Required Spaces L09 Spaces 264 Spaces 182 Spaces 33Q Spaces 3D4 Spaces 330 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace Studio/l BR Apartments 50 Units 1 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces 50 Spaces Hourly 85% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak 4 Required Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces SD Spaces 3 Spaces 12 Spaces 50 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace 2♦ BR Apartments 10 U'ts 2 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces Hourly 85% 85% 99% 99% 99% 99% M-thly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak 4 Required spaces u Spaces 17 Spaces 20 Spaces S Spaces ZQ Spaces 20 Spaces 2.2 Larkin Terrace Small Restaurant, Short order 3.25 ksf 12 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces 39 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 95% 98% 95% 98% 95% Peak 4 Required Spaces 72 Spaces je Spews 31 Spaces 3Z Spaces 33 Spaces 3Z Spaces 2.3 Larkin Terrace General Retail 17097 k,f 5 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces 86 Spaces Hourly 95% 95% 80% 40% 65% 50% Monthly 64% (July) 80% (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) 64% (July) 80% (late December) Peak k Required Spaces 3j Spaces spaces 44 Spaces 73 Spaces 36 Spaces 34 Spews 3. Zen Garden Restaurant(7,128sf) 7.1 k,f 1R 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces 128 Spaces Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 98% 95% 98% 95% 98% 95% Peak a Required Spaces 34 Spaces 91 Spaces M Spaces Lzz Spaces M Spaces }jj Spaces 4. Artemis Fitness (3,564f) 42 maxoc. 0.33 14 Space, 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces Hourly 90% 90% 80% 80% 30% 30% Monthly 65% 911% 65% 95% 65% 95% Peak 4 Required Spaces g Spaces 42 Spaces Z Spaces U Spaces 3 Spaces 4 Spaces S. Formerly Tilt (2,677 sf) 50 seats 0.5 (tavern) 25 Spaces 2, Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces Hourly 75% 7S% 100% 100% 100% 100% Mu,tlVY 99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% Peak 4 Required Spaces 12 Spaces 12 Spaces 23 spaces 21 Spaces 73 spaces 21 Spaces 6. Comentra Urgent Care (8,S86 sf medical office) 86 k,f 5 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces Hourly 80% 80% 15% 15% 0% 0% Monthly 95% 80% 95% 80% 95% 80% Peak 4 Required Spaces 31 Spaces 21 Spaces ¢ Spaces S Spaces Q Spaces Q spares 7. McDonalds 35 k,f 12 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces Hourly 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% 50% Monthly 100% 95% 100% 95% 100% 95% Peak a Required Spaces 23 Spaces j4 Spaces 11 Spaces jQ Spaces 21 Spares IQ Spews B. Citizens Bank 26 k,f 5.9 16 Spaces 36 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces 16 Spaces Hourly 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) BO% (late December) Peak 4 Required Spaces 1S Spaces 13 Spaces Q Spaces Q Spaces Q Spans Q Spaces Total Number of Required Parking Spaces 443.3 Spaces 6DZ.B Spaces 517.6 Spaces 646.2 Spans 620.8 Spaces 641.3 Spaces Parking space ratios are based on the Article 13, page 221, of the 2016 South Burlington Land Development Regulation Shared parking adjustment factors are based on Shared Parking, Second Edition , Urban Land Institue, 2005 LARKIN TERRACE SOUTH BURLINGTON., VT OEM ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS DRAWING INDEX ADD ADDITIONAL GA GAGE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SHEET NO. DRAWING NAME SHEET NO. DRAWING NAME SHEET NO DRAWING NAME A/C AIR CONDITION(ING) GALV GALVANIZED DWG. N0. AT ACOUSTIC TILE GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR QT QUARRY TILE CIVIL DRAWINGS ADJ ADJUSTABLE GL GLASS DWG. NAME TITLE LINE 107 ROOM NUMBER AFF ADM FINISH FLOOR GYP GPYSUM R RADIUS, RISER SHEET NO SP-1 OVERALL EXISTING SITE AND P.U.D. PLAN ALUM ALUMINUM RD ROOF DRAIN, ROAD 5P-2 CIVIL SITE PLAN Y'-50' APROX APPROXIMATE HHGT HEIGHT REINF REINFORCEMENT $ ELEVATION TAG SPA CIVIL SITE PLAN Y'=2d ARCH ARCHITECTURAL HC HOLLOW CORE REQD REQUIRED ELEVATION NO. HORIZ HORIZONTAL REV REVISION ELEVATION 5P-4 CIVIL SITE PLAN NW 1"-10' BD BOARD H/C HANDICAP RM ROOM SHEET NO. 1025' 5P-5 CIVIL SITE PLAN SW 1"='KY BLDG BUILDING HM HOLLOW METAL RO ROUGH OPENING SPOT ELEVATION SP-6 CIVIL SITE PLAN NE 1"=10' BLKG BLOCKING H✓AC HEATING. VENTINALTION, & A/C 5P-7 CIVIL SITE PLAN SE 1"=10' BSMT BASEMENT 1D INSIDE DIAMETER 5 SCH SOUTH SCHEDULE SECTION NO. SECTION MARKER EX-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN CAB CABINET IN INCH 5CW SOLD CORE WOOD SHEET NO. CD-1 CIVIL DETAILS CER CERAMIC 1NSUL 1NSULATIONIINSULATED SECT SECTION CD-2 CIVIL DETAILS CJ CL CONTROL JOINT CLEAR, CLEARANCE IM INCL INTERIOR INCLUDED SHT SIM SHEET SIMILAR PARTITION TYPE CD-3 CIVIL DETAILS CLG CEILING SL SLOPE _ CD 4 CIVIL DETAILS C.H. CEILING HEIGHT JAIL JC JANITOR'S CLOSET SPEC SPECIFICATION DETAIL MARKER CD-5 CIVIL DETAILS CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT JT JOINT 5Q SQUARE CP-6 CIVIL DETAILS COL COLUMN 5TD STANDARD J 12 CONC CONCRETE KIT KITCHEN, KITCHENETTE STL STEEL ROOF SLOPE INDIATION LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS CONST CONSTRUCTION SUSP SUSPENDED 5 CONT CONTINUOUS LAV LAVATORY 5. STL STAINLESS STEEL LID LAYOUT, MATERIALS & GRADING CPT CT CARPET CERAMIC TILE LAM LAMINATE T & G TONGUE AND GROOVE 214 DOOR NUMBER GMP ELECTRIC ISTING TEE INVENTORY DI GM MATL MATERIAL TEL TELEPHONE, REVISION LIDO PHASE ONE ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN PET PIA DETAIL DIAMETER MAX MOO MAXIMUM MEDIUM DENSITY OVERLAY TEMP TH THK TEMPORARY THICK, THICKNESS L12 PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS DIM PN DIMENSION DOWN MECH MTL MECHANICAL METAL THRSLD TOS THRESHOLD TOP OF STEEL, SLAB 0WINDOW TYPE L1.3 L2.0 PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS PLANTING PLAN City of So. Burlington D5 DOWNSPOUT ON MINIMUM TOW TOP OF WALL p PWG DRAWING MO MASONRY OPENING TYP TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWNGS E EAST N NORTH UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE - �B A101 GARAGE FLOOR PLAN EA EACH NIC NOT IN CONTRACT A102 FIRST FLOOR PLAN ELEC ELECTRICAL NO NUMBER VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE - A103 SECOND FLOOR PLAN S ECO ELEV EQ ELEVATION, ELEVATOR EQUAL NOM NTS NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE VERT VEST VERTICAL VESTIBULE 12 COLUMN GRID NORTH ARROW A104 THIRD FLOOR PLAN EQUIP EQUIPMENT VIF VERIFY IN FIELD ° A105 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN EXIST EXISTING OC ON CENTER VWC VINYL WALL COVERING A201 ELEVATIONS EXP EXPANSION OD OUTSIDE DIAMETE WATER, WEST ILA202 ELEVATIONS FP FLOOR DRAIN OPNG OPP OPENING OPPOSITE W W/ WIPTH, WASTE. WITH CENTER LINE - - 1" DN CHANGE IN ELEVATION A301 BUILDING SECTION FF FINISHED FLOOR W/0 WITHOUT A701 PARTITION ASSEMBLIES FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER W/ CABINET PL PLATE WD WOOD A702 PARTITION A55EM5LIE5 F. EXT. FIRE EXTINGUISHER W/0 CABINET PLYWD PLYWOOD WT WEIGHT A710 HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLIES FIN FINISH PRELIM PRELIMINARY WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC A711 HORIZONTAL ASSEMBLIES FL FT FLOOR, FLASHING FOOT,FEET P51 PTD POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PAINTED WWM WELDED WIRE MESH A901 30VIEWS FIG FOOTING P.T. PRESSURE TREATED REVISIONS WNwsWrO fhaA Sub 101 Sp0h0uMig0n.NC6NCi PII k flaEitlrrN'Mmtt:.mn Rabideau Architects tit n r% At a N/F L— I 111 n N/F Southland I Enterprises, Inc, a I I I S, i 'gym N/F KAPSHA Properties. Inc. Parcel UM N/F Olds Orchard Realty Partnership, LP / ,\ 1 Parcel B// / S 70a47-26-E 513.91S ' N/F Jolley S 71"224'41"E Associates, LLC NIF 17Fayette •JLC r$ropt$ N/FCREJV I 1 01$ Fifteen NE french ' - \ Holdings N�188.80' S 71"22'41-E 2 N/F Spill" F ParMcDcel C F I \ anelds of - Ewfirg city South Burlington anky mnt \ N/ esee.-� \ �1 �N/F Northfield 1 Savings Bank s7xr 80' wide night -of -Way subject to irrevocable offer of dedication � w �\ I'6 Parcel E \ N/F L8M Pertnerslnp ROW I � N/F Grandview / I Farms,NIF Larkin Inc. ' Parcel D — �--N�RE19W N/F Sisters and Brothers Inveslmenl Group, LLC e65M1NbumeR4 - — 11 David M. Ferrell Trust 1 Shelbu rne Road Corp. N/F Ferrell Distributlng Corporal_ 1,` 1 N/F 1 1 �' = I 12M Shelb—Hoed Awlaoialm \\ Zone Ime ham City of South Burlington O6iciel mapping —A 3 o' r,v Bar Scds J' -ix,---- LOCUS CIVIL ENGINEER WehsaLJlnsinCOI Engineers.Inc a 1 e0Min S, .—SUM2e1 5 L T c802)(r 9]803Mro59021] F 190219]e-eats mell(0nkrebsendkmirgcan _* NO 5703 FOR PERMIT REVIEW LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE I R-sa V. 10113n6 OVERALL EXISTING SITE and P.U.D. PLAN DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO K1=15300 DATE OYi9'16 REVISED SCALE 99 Plolecl PllaSe PREl1MINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS (as Olde Orchard Perk Condominiums ,I Ferrell Property 11 ,I ,1 ,1 11, Epsting RR Tracks// �i�` f/�j New ip- p drainage channel I I New EmergencySpillweY. Sear Detest 1 wRIM ---- \� 1 1 \i4 LEGEND 12 Surwy Control Point Existing Troe Line - Existng S"grr Existing O'rain Link Fen - Existing Light Po% x Existing Barbed Wire Fence Existng Deciduous Tree Existng Stockade Fence Existng Ewgre- Tree �sv Existng Underground Power .... Existnq Spot LYade Elewtl- -.- - - Existnq Water Line^dront/Yoi.e/Shutoff Existing Gas Line/lroive _ _ Approxnrote Property Line -0-- Existing Sewer Linellknhde — Existing Setback — ea - Existing Sewer Forcennofn Existnq Easement -x- - _ - - tea- Existing Storm Line/lyonhoie/Bosin ® Pro -co ns6uction Excowtion -.P �07- Existing 0--head Power/Power Pais New Deciduous Tree —�� Existing Om -head U671ty New E-green Troe -�•^'m Existnq Communications Line —.1 Finish Grade Spot Grade Eiewhon —n6. Exfstnq PBX Line Finish Crude Dkection of Flow, —a•ar- Existing Underground Electric a Telephone Lnr -��g�� Finish (rode AfoJer Carl — Ile• Existing Site Light Line —���+ Finish Grade Minor Contour Existing Stearn Line _g New Cos Lne/Yoiw Existing Wet/ond Sewer Lins,'k-hole Existing Guaroh7d New sewer- For-cn l �l -ST- - - - - " New Storm Line/Ifonhde/Bosin uo New UndeMroin -- - - Ro - - New Roof Drofn -w- New Water Lfne/Hydront1✓Wm1'3hutoff _pyl New PBX Lne ucP— - New Underground Power . New Cieorfng Limits New Chain Link Fence New Stockade Fence OF Constmctlorn Fence s Barrier Fence Sot Fence EA.In g pawd roadway S3 CIVIL ENGINEER —Icb S Lensi,q Con Ito, Enginaws. Inc. teC Main ter, 0 201 CT (80 )0 8-0 5 L . T (902) 9]B03]5 F: (W2) eta-pe19 meil(g�Webfandwminp.wm 1 R >rn � o�.ly _* NO 5703 ? w FOR PERMIT REVIEW m O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE slap, wnd sa,a, c,w rWm tU'tst6 CIVIL SITE PLAN DRAWN BY SLIA PROJECT NO. KL=ISU DATE 909116 REVISED SCALE I' a W SP-2 0' 50' 100' 200' d0O' Pmgd Pn- PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWNGS Bar &Ole I' = 50' ♦) tr of it) Spike in PPf24 EXSTRUCTURE .(7) �^ \� EIev 203.08 I Rim: 195.05 INV IN:1 0.923 8' PVC ,•>� -.� \\ o e, P.4 // 1 \ • i I za bk INV IN:190.Ip 8' PVC ° ..°., ti - 6 \ NV OUT?90.10 8' PVC - -_ -__._ 1 .7 (� \ �.qr 's•`" i 0� 7-'�� �'/ - Rim: 201.80 I --- --/ � \ `s$ -- �I \\$ HI ° u \ 1 \ - - - /Rim�.l PVC I ,aa aWPvcp rs,x _1F"' • - \ ,1 1 - ` _ _ _ \\ - - �. \ \. \`• ;+:.� \\ INV IN: I 'ib` Connect new water msin I N - \ 00 CIVIL ENGINEER INV V IN:191. - Jf \ � � _ � � � � � a.�.,,-�• � {} •°°° I `p""...,�.,, \ \ �` �` - , Remove misting CB ! L% �I �\H 0� a 'O\ I �Jf - _ - - - -.bl- 1 - QI \ Krell S Canting CanuXing Engirean, Inc. / �_,. �•\ \ I !� - _ I T (502) r. yr os 5 1 r xxx..JJJIIIL B F'. 1802i s)9- a / � IC� i'ti Co-i L71 ��_�.�` - � �'� I , � ••'' - �- - I �"_'�= mail(�IvebfaMrming.com AI -----_ \\\ i I i j\k,j I i � \F-.�n �j ; 1 \ o � _ - - - � � \ p � /, r `\S�N��u'vem„i..�. CB6 1-T.l I� �opedoflr,to I \ r------- Aim:1%.80 III age ye / e«r n•5,03 INV OUT:V95.8QTT-- III Ife 1 \ \ I \ / ST nJw Ma P„ 1 cB1 1 .1- -• - 11Ipi }-Nd\V -%_ 200.48 -- -- �: - NG .38 r Garage Floor Elev. 191.00 / 'II I I FOR PERMIT REVIEW w OUT: 195.2str Flrst Floor Ele202.00 _- - 1/ /I PROPOSED BILDI sss lad, Ir \ \ / f I 1 op r . \ \ I " - -"- LARKIN -- I ll; II I- I I i \\\ / I I ` jl �IuRaoa i ° TERRACE 1 \ / :1SMH 2 I 1 -I-1 ©�----- - I II II r WeI Pqr / � 1i Route 7, Shelburne Road , South1I Rim: 200.70 1 11 --- I1 I2976PVC Bufington, VT INVIi:1992.97PVC P4. INv0117:17 8' PVC -B92.88 I ! I\ :195.7 6• :195.7 e I i I I / N0. DESCRIPTION DATE Pva< T SI nww,,s dbn Ialale xPvc T} \ Rim:200.00 I 1 I I „ \ l II I I ouT:1%-001r SrnuOTu,19F.�)\ II \ , w r�Pf INV INIII 4.95 tY : INv I t .o$1r / Cat I I I I I I O '1 .9512' 1 I 1 1 Rid,:2m I I k I I I 1 I INV IN7193.701Y I 1 I INV IM193.7012' I. I/ 4 1 I INV �1:1%.7o'FE"----- i I I I g I --- I I I I I 1 >! INVO�{(T:193.BO 17 I J F j 1 I 16 I * / _ �,/ (/ _ - -- a I \ eceoffound flonlxl w I\ 1 �NVI .1. 212' ! i 1 i111 q.�\1 * CIVIL - - - -- SITE PLAN Lf Snow Stange - - _ Bike R ck _ I -127 y � � ,a•wc wPe 0 I I \ II• j} I I - II 1 /\ \ 4' I lswoiows/lsaao vt. e... 2oie.a.. Snow Storage - � Snow Storage DRAWN BY sun I I \\ 1 I 11 PROJECT NO 14=,53110 I I I I{ I I } I \ DATE 97e9n6 SMH3 / t 1 1 I I1 I II 11 \ \ C86 Rim: 200.60 1 I IxFvlseD. STMH1 STRUCTURE -(23) R.: 200m INVOUT:193.568'IPVC 1 I j SCALE . 1.=27 \ \ \ 111 1 1 \ Rim: 196.74 Rim: 200.00 INV IN: 1%.619' INVOUT:193.496'IPVC I \ \ \ 1 $ I 1 1 \ 1 INV IN:192.8912' INVIN:1%.4612' INVOUT:195.51121 INVOUT:193.498'IPVC wr I ^ \ \ \ 11 I 1 INV OUT: 192.7918' INV OUT:1953612' I I S P- V \\ \\ \\ I \ \\` I \\ \\ \ \\ CB5 `�� ! /� . \ \ \\ \ SMH 4 Rim: 200.00 \ - _- d ' / ".W Pnae \ INV IN:196.64 G 0` 20 40" 80" IZa° \ \ Rim:191 "qJ \ INV IN:193.72 994 81 INV OUT:195. 4 I /1 PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRANANfiS \ \\ INV OUT:19,3.628"f�C ") INV OUT:195.5412' \ / \4P Bar Scale /-= 20' \\ \\ ` 0__- <r A ®?� EX. SMH 8 INV h INV IOUN:1T9:01.10 8PC 80.10 8" PV// i /`_ -"'==- __ - _ -,_� — ---•-� �. _ — / \\ -`` \ \-\\ \\\\ '—ie_ _ — ♦ INV IN:18 in *\ `•:�`", -� 1'— INV IN:1 .00 o _ J — �//rw � yd s I \ / \ \ -------------------------- — \ I EX. SMH A I _ \ Rim: 201.80 INV OUT:19— 8"PVC — ------"PVC -- I _-'s 8'PVc I I \ '3 =sal h I Remove and dispose of existing CB and piping _ I I Retaining well by others ,�\ '• I I —"— _ _ — \ / Cut and cep eisting steatt ape — — — —-----------1_— 1 - _ ---------_-__-__--- — — _— ----- -- - ----- -- — - ---- \ I I I A �• I I -., V \ C98 I. I •.. v INV OUT:19m 12--._._.__-_.—.._ I 0 v V 1 _'I \ Cet I --------- I I _ \ Rim: 200.46 INV IN:195.3812" I I t \ INV OUT:195.2812" I I I I I I I I t I I I I - ------- -------�\ \\ ' \-- --- --- -------- ----------t— 1 4, I \ Concrete stslrs by others I I `- I --------------7 I I I I I I4 ---- I I \ •t— --- I— —� -- �-- I I j I I I 1 t 11 � / I SMH2I..- I RIm: 200.70 INV IN: 192.978' PVC INV IN:182.978' PVC I / i INV OUTA92.878'PVC 0' 10' 20' 40' 60' -It _..� 'I I Bar Scale 7' = lo' 1 1 --- I \I I \ �r r ' I I I I I\o I I Na concrete beds I I \ I 1 1 I I I ' li 1 I I 0 S\ l I I i I k I \ � �t / / I / R I 1 \\ —�— — — — — — — _8B pv I%pe 1 I 1 i I 1 I \ - 1---------- pad � 6 I I I s �I END INV:195 72 8' INV 195129• I CIVIL ENGINEER WabeaL.enslig Consum S Engineers, Inc. 1e4 Meln Shaet, Suite 201 C T:(60)sa-0 5 L a T (902) 978-OS75 F. (e02) 978-8018 mail®Wabeentlleneing.com E e4 No 5700N3 *- FOR PERMIT REVIEW LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE I i .miminn"(-.i:inJ, nun:.unus 10113116 CONTENT CIVIL SITE PLAN NW / / / I s j // ,mooicwcs/,voo sl .. xmaa,.e I �` ' DRAWN BY PROJECT NO'. I / DATE'. / REVISED -_ — _ i loo / SCALE SP-4 S - _ 5' qVC Plpe -- --- Pq. Phase PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS I I I\ 1 i� Ma -�-------- ----------'+I ---- --------- I _77 i -- 1 I —�— — — — — —s— — — — a•wbIPa _� — e'f)VC PiPa c ;I — — — -- -- ---$ -- I —".. �— — —f— — $ _ •,-..... -ti r v®we11193.74 I I I I I I T I Depress Islands and finish with I 1 END �'. -'% Tl= ,pi / / �'P •� ] stamped concrete (typ 3islands) 11 INV:195 72 6' I I I INVA95726• 4 \ �< CIVIL ENGINEER I 3 I I I I I I 1 ( 1 U Krebs S Lensirg Conaultlng Engineers, Inc. is n street 6wb 201 1 / Coletteate, "375 e PVC PIPe _ — / T: 802 878-0375 I I I I f 1 I I p ( �� STD;- —/sT — - "DmI.V@—Ijl9!SJB L F (wxl ale-gma m --------------- I I Z' j — — — — -1- ems l®krebasntllamlrg oo I 1 '� emzoco3o \ / :195.00 12' ,----------------- I I I -_ 1 I F/= ,z�Pv w ,• dP r sT i � I \� \ �\ ---r `,a;��oFeveq"��,,,, /--_____—__ I I I I 1z•w PPe II IN OIA94.9512 s RucruRE N I I Rim \\ _ „unlll m FOR PERMIT REVIEW / Rim: 200.00 INV IN:193.70 12" / INV IN:1' .1112" -_ -----`----i---------- INVIN1937012 �- I I �' �\ (I INV OUT:193.60 12 110 -- - - - — — --- 1 Fiim: 200.00 II II 1\ I\ I /1 �. _. \\ I I I I \ INV IN 194.4912" I, 1 1 , , — y ��� I I R I LARKIN INV OUT 194.12 12" 1 / ' J I \ I ---- - -- -- - - --- - ------ TERRACE PVC P—'—_-- / Route 7, Shelbume Road, South _-- — — k / I 1 I — — — al — - — — - — = — — — —� — — — — — — — — — — — =----- --- I I ' / _ ��0wae Butlington,VT ` -- — — — — — —_— i I — — -- _ _ — 19 S,,— N . DESCRIPTION DATE —i--- ---., —�— / Qwaoriasi9l DES IO slam d ,alana, oum,atllPa Io�wls --------i / , 1 -r -- -- _ 7 - - 1 --a,-----�------�-= -�---�=-� 0 -- — — — — — — — - --, --- ---- - --- \ tar PVcPIPe ,—' ,ro .� CIVIL 1` SITE PLAN 00 Sw n--st aa. ---" 153M/DMS/15NO Sit. ease 2516A,e DRAWN 9Y. SLIA \ 20p _ , / ' / I PROJECT N0: kL-15300 DATE. 9Q9fl6 SMH 3 CBS Rim: 200.60 REVISED . Rim: Z00.00 INV OUT193.56 W PVC STMH1 RIM: 198.74 STRUCTURE - (23) INV IN:195.61 8" INV OUT:193.49 6' PVC INV OUT:193.a9 6. PVC INV IN:192.8912" Rim: 200.00 INV OUT:195.51 12' SCALE' 1'= 1P INV OUT:192.7918" INV IN:195.4612' , INV OUT:195.1 2' I SP-5 0' fO' 20' 40" 60' -- P,,j,,t Phase PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS Bar Scale 1 = 10' \ goo EX, SMHA \ Rim: 201.80 — — — --� I INV 0UT:193.548' PVC I __--------- — — — — — — — — — — — I I � I to3•or6•rvco�,� +`� ..-�,���! �i��///'/ h I —__— __ II / I --------_.lrJl---1—_ j \ / I I 1 — — — — ems_ — _ _ — --- — — —.� I I 0' 10' 20' 4a' 60r I I Bar Scale 7- = 7o CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs 8 L& Mai Cone , S Englnaers, Inc. 1An Main ....R Ring E 301 CdcMebr, Vr OSACB L "al T (802) 878-0375 F'.(W2) 078-8018 meil(g�bebe'n'd-1 inp.wm 1\\\IIIIIIIIII/I/�� \yti' H. VO,1i/'/� _* ; NO 5703 _ FOR PERMIT REVIEW s LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Slam p"alanq cub rads 10113,16 CIVIL SITE PLAN NE mh 153ooNwcs/1s�pa sl. e... xole.e.a DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO KL=15300 DATE. VM6 REVISED SCALE. 1'= 10 SP-6 PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS S rRUCTURE - (22) IN 194.95 12" i I V1 :195.o512• JI IN UT 194.O95,2" 3 �I \ `I (I f so ss x 1 / 7 o EXIS " s \ v V II E CIVIL ENGINEER au/ldi, _ Wabn8 Laneirp C«rsuI's Engel Int. l I W, V 054 201 cac(W2)8Vros5 r. 1802I a -W-0 Ieozl era -eels Jr ` amWlpkr bsantll�nsirg.wm M PVC PI — —--•--.— --_— _.— ___ — — — — — — — — i � vE N. " NO 5703 ______ _ \ — — — - • FOR PERMIT REVIEW \__ _—"—" ------- ZOO i� r — ®, i o J I --- --- — ---- 1 7Ri- ---t LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Budington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE Slvm P-1,releld, cuN ra0us 10/13116 SMH3Rim:200.80BS .00 INVOUT193.56 6• PVCSTRUCTURE - (23) NV 1 �85.61 6' INV 0UT:193.49 8" PVC I I Rim: Z00.00 INV OUT:196.51 17 INV OUT:193.49 8" PVC INV IN:195.4612' INV 0UT: 195:3612, I 1 I I 1 I CIVIL ` SITE PLAN ---1- / SE CBS Rim: 200.01) 9 I INV IN:195.64 6• INV IN:195.646" q, w ' INV OUT:195.54 12• I y F 1 \ / I 15000/)—/-0 SO ease QIBAe — \ DRAWN 91 SLM \------ PROJECT NO KL=15300 ------- f99-_---- / DATE 929'76 REVISED'. ---- 200 ,1 i SP-7 Y w PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS Bar Sca/e 1- _ /o' II II7 I _-Legend O/dot Protection _yr— — — — — '�o- New Storm Line%llanhde/mosin °- - - - -—,�-ws— Existing St,a'm Lme/CaMh Boebl/monhde Existing Contours Proposed Finish Crode Contours o o Constz tion Disturbance Limit 90 left New Rip RoP Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes 1. The plan is for erosion prevention and sediment control design only. Sea Site Plans for all other site related design. 2. Contrrector shall be responsible for complying wfth all State and Local erosion prevention and sediment control standards and permit requirements during c,nsUucfw, 3. The Ilmit of dismrban- shell bs clearly darned by C-Imesce, surveyor prior to clearing. Erosion and sediment control devices shall be established to trap sediment on alto. 4. Clearing and grubbing shell not begin unfit disturbance limits and sediment controls are in place. All roots, stumps and deleterious materials shall be removed from the elle. The Contracor shall minimize the amount of disturbed land et any given time. 5. All erosion control shell be placed as shown on the drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall maintain the arw,n control unfil the Engineer is sanared that permanent ground cover is established and that further measures are not required. It shall be Me responsibility of the Contractor to employ appropriate erasion control as shown on these drawings and any Met measures ea necessary to into sediment on site. Refer to permit maintenance and inspection requirements. 9. All areas of disturbance shall be permanently or temporarily stabilized as soon as possible and within 48 hours of final grading. All arse. of disturbance shall be at least temp,venly stabilized within 14 days of initial disturbance. Any disturbance after 14 consecutive days of exposed sell shell be atebilized daily unless the following exceptions apply: e. Stabilization is not required it earthwork is to continue in the area in the next 24 hours and there is re precipitation forecast in the next 24 hours. b. Stabilization is not required it the work is occurring in it self —retained evicevaeon (i.a. no outlet) with is depth of 2 ft. or greater (e.g. house foundation mosvefion, utility trenches). Stabilization measures shell include mulch and nering, erosion control matting, crushed stone, gravel, or pavement. 6. Unlese specifically Indicated on Me plans ....pmbb methods of stabilization shall include: - Strew Mulching - 2 tons per acre. Approximately 1-uniform thickness. Only allowed on relatively flat areas with minimum upelope watershed. Mulch must be properly anchored to prevent material from being bkavn away by wind (wlndthrow). Hydroseeding- Applied at the manufacturer's recommended application rate. Contractor shall provide evidence of proper application rate. Hydroseeding is not allowed in areas of concentrated! flow. Erosion control mating - S758N rolled mating must be applied to ell slopes 3:1 (H:V) or greeter (unless otherwise indicated). Crushed stone or crushed gravel - Typically used for temporary access rcads and construction staging areas. ]. The Contractor shall use water for dust control. 8. The Contractor shall provide inlet protection around all catch basins (existing or new) Mat collect construction site stormwater rumor. -Install silt fence along downslope limits of disturbance prior to earth disturbance, typical. Use straw wattles over Impervious Carew or where approved �y the Engineer. 9. At a minimum dewstaring shell be accomplished by seating a sump ph filled wfth crushed stone and pumping to a sediment filter beg placed downslope of any disturbed soils. The pumpout We. shall be monkorad to ensure visibly discolored water does leave the project it. 10, The Contractor shall be responsible for provlding a dewatermg/stomwater bypass plan for approval by the Engineer, The objective of the plan let, provide a strategy that, when implemented, the pumped water is not vlalbly discolored when it leave. the project site. 11. A stabilized construction entrance shall be installed and maintained at ALL conatr-tic..... as location,. Contractor ahell be responsible for Installing crushed stone to provide stable areas for construction vehicle inure alleging, and storage. The Contractor is responsible for providing and maintaining sufficient stone to prevent ruring and sediment tracking omits. 12. Any paved roads used by construction vehicles shall be swept daily, or et a greeter frequency, if din or gravel is tracked from the site. The swept debris shall be immediately removed from I .. of curb if applicable. 13. All temporary ineabn and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after final stabilization or after the measures are no longer needed, unless otherwise authorized. 14. All sediment removed from sediment control practices shell be placed in an approved soil disposal am. 15. All areas Met do not have establishetl vegetation by October 15M must be stabilized in accordance with the Winter Stabilization requirements outlined in Me Low Risk She Handbook, See Details. 16. After permanent seeding the Contractor shell be responsible for watering to ensure adequate vegetative growth. 17. The location of temporary conslruMion fencing and temporary access road. shown on Me plan are for schemed. purposes only. The Contractor shall be responsible for providing all necessary temporary comb -ion fencing, temporary roads, sleging amea, are, ne ssa vy to complete the work. 18. The Contractor shall be responsible for all inspection and maintenance of the erosion prevention and sediment control practices for the project. Inspections and corresponding reports shall be performed st a minimum, once a week and after every precipitation event that mauls,in it discharge from the site. CIVIL ENGINEER Kreb & Lansing CBused, sure 201 re, Inc. 1istsd Mein Street, Suite 201 CT (50ter,VT OS5 L e T (eo2) 8]8-0315 F:(802)878.9618 mail®krebsandl.mrh; com �toiEtil� vf'/�xr y�Pr� H. Ivp.�Oy% _* NO 5703 FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE I ,etx;:a xxxxx aIDrlm CIVIL EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO. KL=15300 DATE. 10/13116 REVISED SCAL 1'=W :/ 0' 50' 100' 200' ,TOO' Prcied Rinses PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS Bar Scale i- = 50' r ff I i \------------- T:. I r xl i \ v, `\ I II ij t - - -- - 1 qqq -----� '--------/-- j ---------------- - \ \ \ \ I - - - -I �� fee- - - � i \ \ ..\__----------- r „` T-r T -\ We'_!as__`.\\,c:------------ 1--T--W-------------- I --- ---------------- I Ir_ ________________/---__.___--_________--____. I I---- --- -- --- ---- i----I---------- --- ----------�- I , I y - / - ------------- - '- -- -1 1 !I 1 $ s � I I,I - , 1 \ I I I / i I t� I�hj I I I I I I I I 1 I I II I i 1 1 \ I I I 1 1 I 1 I I \ 1 \ 1 I THU AL _---------- 1 Fayette Road r_�� '1011 �8 CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs 8 Leming ConauNng Englnaars, Inc tea Meln Strwf, Sulfa 20f Colehwbr, VT OS4 L T: (802) 87"375 F'. (8e02) 878-N 8 amell®Itt bcentlknairg.com a, s ,T `a , Ss hit Ihh FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT J NO. DESCRIPTION DATE ((� f xxxxx xxxxx v1 CONTENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN DRAWN BY SUM PROJECT N0: KL-15300 DATE. 091&16 REVISED: / / \ SCALE'. I \ Ek1 See Legend Sht. SP-2 I 1 O' 20' 40, 80' 120' Prq. Pharr PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS BO/ SCOle 1- = 20 ' r Match existing odiacent material (gross, grove% mulch, etc) '7he contractor shall sweep and apply emulsilied asphalt to base course pavement prior to laying top course. Extend fullo a^ ° `$• ° a depth of crushed grovel • e e , subbase 12" • a beyond ° edge of pavement ° Ali concrete used in the construction of concrete curb shot/ be air entrained and mode with Portland cement. The concrete shall meet section 501 of the Stole of 1/crmont Standard Specification for Coss A J" bit. cant. concrete and have 18 day 1" Type L7- top compressive strength of 4,000 psi. 1" Type 1 - base 4" Low/Mg course (704.05, fine) -20" Dense Graded Crushed Stone (704.06) Alternative materials idenfiAed in Section 301 - Subbase are not allowed Mira6 50OX, or approved equal. Overlap rn!Wmvm of 2' Loy Aof against subgrode . o folds or wrink/es) / LUndisturbed material or compacted fill (See Note 13 Contractor shaft shape and roll subgrode to reflect linish Road Construction Notes) grade dro/noge to Remove all organics before prior msto/ling placing fit or grove/ M/ra/i 50OX The Controctor shall prepare the subgrode /n conformance with the design grades then, in the presence of the Engineer, shaft proof roll the subgrode with a loaded Provide 4" lopsoi/ grid seed Concrete Curb - Broom knish concrete - Al/pits to be tool fin/shed - Expansion/confroction pints every 20' with 1/2" pint filler. Score 1/3 total depth of 10' intervals - Apply 2 coots of Euclid Everaleor VOX cure/seal compound to o// concrete surfaces, per the manufacturers specifications. radius Joint filler shall be resilient non -extruding cellular Aber joint, unil,m/y saturated with asphalt, offering o minimum of 70.E recovery after compression. The Engineer shalt be contacted at least 24 hours prior to forming concrete curb to review layout. The contractor shall sweep and apply emulsified asphalt to base course pavement prior to /"y'g top course. Concrete 6 Curb (to, �,• sl bituminous con ate � sa, t Subbase material shall be placed and compacted in 12" ••. 4 • ,.� maximum lifts. tandem dump truck. Conditions may require the removal The contractor to take sieve analysis of .f unsuitable material and placement of additional subbase. grove/ as soon it arrives on site. The Owner must approve any work involved with the removal of unsuitable material and placement of odd'tiona/ Trove/ over grove/ with any vehicle tracking subbase. % t / t f e r •^ Without Concrete Curb N. TS. sot prior o p ocemen o povem prohibited. /f grave/ is contaminated after placement, the Site Contractor shall be responsible removal of all contaminated grove/ and poying for a// recommended sieve ono/ysis as determined by the Engineer. Tvoical Road Cross Section Detail N. T.S. Road Construction Notes ( All ences to rood shall apply to porkmg areas as well. ) 1. New rood shall be consNucfed to the /fine and grade shown on the dew/rigs. The road and ut//ily locations shall be as typically detailed unless otherwise shown. 2 All road and pork/rig construction shall be completed in accordance with the Vermont Agency of Tronportat/on Standard Specifications for Cosstruct/on" 20". hereafter called ✓ mont Highway Specifications, pecil/cotions found on these plans, and project pecihcationx In case of conflict the more stdngent peciALofion shall apply as a'eterm/ned by the Engineer. J. Toe Contractor shall follow ✓ onf H/ghwoy Specilcofions (2011) Sect/on 203.11 7 p/aclny and spread/rig embonkmonts. 4. rill melorial 7 road embankment shall meet Note PJ below and be approved by the Engineer. F%I shall be placed in 12" lilt; wetted and compacted with sofis/octory compaction equipment 10 95X of moximum density (Standard Proct ). 5 Road in file/ sections shall be placed and compacted o m#yAnum of 3 feet above top of any uNdy to be installed before trench is ex ca ,led / pone placement In trenches and cut secfi-A the Contractor shall provide all necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing to ma/ntaln compliance with all OSHA/vOSHA regulations 6 Methods !al construct/on of subgrode shall conlorm to Vermont Highway %-Ifcali- (2011) 20312 or as determined by the Engineer. 7 Any subgrode or subbase disturbed by Contractor, or rendered u...liable by construction machinery, shall be removed and replaced with pprowd granular bock Ail of the Contractor's expense. The subgrode shall be compacted to attain at least 95X of the maxrnum density (Standard Proctor) before placing road or embankment materials. 8 The Owner will pay /or on site sods testing t'—ppfion, sieve, and proof,). The Contractor shall pay farlolling tests The Cmfmctor is lull, reponvb/e for coordnohng all fesfingl specfions. Contractor shall provide minimum 24 hour notice to fasting agency prior to placement of any item to be tested 9. Sand borrow and cushion shall conform to ✓ moot Highway soecilicofi- (2011) 70303 Granular b,raw shall conform to the v6,mont Highway Specdcations 70304. 10 Grove/ subbase for pavement shoe conform to Vermont Highwoy Specifications (2011) 704.05, coarse. Substitute materials identified /n ✓AOT Speciicotions Scotia.^ .701 - S.bbase ore not allowed 11. Leveling course shall c lbrm to Vermont Highway Specil/cations (2011) 704.04 fine grading Shoulders shall conform to Section 704.12, Aggregate !, Shoulders 12. BYum/nous coaciete pavement shall con twin to ✓ ant hhoway Speci!/cations (2011) Section 404 and 406. Binder course shall be Tjpe / / AI, alit AWsh ,coding course sho// be Type ill, /V, or-bs detoiw. 13 Embankment fill f all i pervious oreoA EXCLUDING BUILDINGS, shall be a sieve pool%cot/on as !allows: Sieve $ fine, 4 100 2' 85-100 /4 60-100 /200 30 maximum 14 Dense graded crushed st-, crushed grave/ and sand borrow sha/I not be canlominoted by walk Construction traffic shall not !ravel over exposed areas of this motenbl. 15. Contractor is roVonsib/e ! all pavement markings (leparking striping, handicap morkingx stop bars, etc.) shown or implied on the Plans. - Point for pavement markings shall be H�vrphost Waterborne T-f4c Point by Franklin Point Company /1 shot/ be -Aeon,,, VOC compliont fast dying, 100R ear is waterbome, traffic paint. paint for stop bars and crosswalks shall be while a// other /me striping shall be yellow Co,,Arm point color with Owner prior to opp/cofian. - Trol!/c point shall be applied with a unil,m thickness and at o rote such that no pavement is visible one, dHn9 Additional point opplicotlon wdI be required if under/Nng pavement is isble. -J- bit. cant. 1" Type IV - top 2' Type LL - base -4" Leveling course (704.05, Ane) 20" Dense Graded Crushed Stone (704.06) A/tennofive moterio/s /dent/led /n Section 301 - Subbose ore not o//owed -M'roli 50OX, or approved equal. Overtop min/mum of 2' Loy flat against subgrode. (no !olds or wrinkles) -Undisturbed material or � Contractor shall shape compacted fill (See Note 13 and all subgrode to Road Construction Notes) reflect finish grade R moro,9onics before re drainagePr for to p/acing file/ or growl. installing Mioli' 500X The Contractor shall prepare the subgrode in conformance with the design grades then, in the presence of the Engineer, shall proof roil the subgrode with a loaded tandem dump truck. Conditions may require the removal of unsuitable material and placement of additional subbase. The Owner must approve any work involved with the removal of unsuitable material and placement of additional subbase. With Concrete Curb Travel over grove/ with any vehicle tracking soil prior to placement of pavement is prohibited. /f grove/ is contaminated after placement, the Contractor shot/ be responsible removal of a// contaminated grove/ and paying for all recommended sieve analysis as determined by the Engineer. Extend crushed grove/ subbase 12" beyond edge of pavement. 4" 7pso# see site for grading All concrete used in the construction of concrete sidewalk shall be air entrained and mode with Portland cement. The concrete shall meet section 541 of the Slate of Vermont Standard Specification for Construction for Class A concrete and have 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 psi. Joint filler shall be resilient non -extruding cellular fiber Apply 1 coots of Euclid Ewc/eo pint, uniformly saturated VOX cure/sea/ compound to a// with asphalt. offering a 6" As shown on plans 6" concrete surfaces, per the minimum of 70. recovery 6" M47k Class A 4000 psi manufacturers specifications. otter compression, oncreie. 6" wide grovel shoulder 4' topsoil see site zs�o» .ama by plan /or grad/rig IV "I[. ENGINEER _ Yoh° 500x_ M18 KrebaB 164 M,I CS-. S En2in1 Inc. fe4Meln Shaet Sulle201 CobheaM V706ed8 f1" Crushed grove/ subbase / r. teozl e7o-as75 Undistmbed earth or approved (704.05, lne). L e Qke bz dI- i, �n®xree..nalen. �.0ore /i// material compacted l0 95X standard proctor /n 12 lifts. Concrete Notes - Broom finish concrete - Construction joints shall be spaced max. 24' in of/ directions. See Concrete Construction Joint Detail - Score control pints 1-1/2" depth of intervals equal 10 width of sidewalk. Contractor is responsible for providing appropriately sized too//rig trowel - Apply 2 coats of Euclid Everc/ear VOX cure/seat compound to a// concrete surfaces, per the manufacturer's specifications. - Concrete construction and curing shall conform to section 61803 of the current VAOT Standard Specifications !or Construct/on New Concrete Sidewalk Detail (For Concrete Woks 6ft. Wide or Less) N TS. A// concrete used in the construction of Heavy Duty Concrete shall be mode with Port/and cement The concrete shot/ meet section 541 of the State of Vermont Standard Specif/catloos tar Construction, hove 28 day compressive strength of 5,000 ps/, and meet the fol/ow/ng mix des/gn. Max. wafer -cement ratio (/b./lb.) 0.44 Min. cement factor (bogss/C. r) 7.5 Entrained air content (X) 5 - 7 Slump (inches, before adding HRNR) 2 - 4 Use m trained agent conforming to ASTAt C260 with 5l en 7X total air. Use high range water red cing agent conforming to ASTN 0494 /n a// concrete. Concrete shot/ be instotled in alternating pours at construction pints. Refer to Concrete Construction Joint/Control ✓olht DetaA. Hold re/nlorcing bock from all sides J"� Concrete Notes - Broom finish concrete - Construction pints shall be paced max. 24' /n a// diections. See Site Plan far layout. - Sowcut control pints 1-1/2" depth at intervals equal to width of sidewalk. - Apply 2 coots of Chemstop WB siloxone/si/one water repellant to all concrete surfaces, per the manufacturer's pecificotians. Product shall be opplied alter 7 doy curInq is complete. - Concrete construction and curing shall conform to section 6180.i of the current VAOT Standard Specif/cations !or Construction Provide expens/on pint New concrete. See grid seo/er where concrete Concrete section Detail /s against curb or other concrete foundation. Is shown on pions � I / 12" min Note. Owner or Contractor is not allowed to place deicing materials on new/y poured concrete sidewalk for a period of 6 months r-8" thick 5, 000 psi concrete l-l/a" dear " 24" thick brushed grovel ,subbase (704. 05 Age) Y4il/es{ otherwise ° • ,., Inc' oteda Instal/ in 12"'Zi t ...' • , Subbase shall be 3 `lep1 FT from natural grovels and crushed quarried rock only Blended concrete ar recycled asphalt is not allowed ° °a •, %he dontroctar° to t 9ke S1Q✓e .. ' , �andlys/s'of°grave/ qs sooh it , ' • .Qr/ibes Ora Site.. sal M ° ° New subbase. See " Subbase Section Deto// 6x6-6/6 Gaivan-o' WWF (sheets only) (provide Chairs !or support) `trade 60, 15 epoxy coated rebor ® 12" as each way. Concrete block supports M/roA 500x, or Undisturbed earth or approved All approved equal. material compacted to 95T standard Concrete sho// be wet cured for o The Contractor shall prepare the subgrode in c i7ear, shall with the organic in 12" lifts. Remove growl minimum Of 7 days with water design grades then, /n the presence of the Engineer, sho/r proof roll the organics before placing file/ r grovel and HysdroCure 516, or approved subgrode with o loaded tandem dump (ruck. Conditions may require the Contractor shall shape and roll removal of unsuitable material and placement of additional subbase. The subgrode to reflect fin/sh grade equal, wet Curing Covers. Owner must approve any work involved with the removal of unsuitable drainage prior to into///ng ahnoA 500X material and placement of additional subbase. Subbase Section Concrete Section New Heavy Duty Concrete Detail N. T.S L uuuaunoor NO 5703 FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE I xxxxx xxxxx CONTENT CIVIL DETAILS 1a 0/0w /1 Dams. 2D10Awq DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO KL=1530D DATE'. oXYY16 REVISED'. SCALE: a, noic CD-1 P1o�Da PnasO PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS r r Epoxy tooted dowels shall be used for Heavy Duty Concrete Trowe/ finish edge NEW Concrete Sidewalk, o' NEW MulihUse Concrete Sidewalk, or H vy Duty Concrete Sidewalk. (See Apprpr/ate Detail Concrete Design) PVC dowel sleeve-. RMINVIII ME— -NEW Concrete Sidewalk, or NEW /ti-Use Concrete 5lf wo... a Heovy Duly Concrete Sidewalk. (See Apprprlo/e D00 /or Conceefe Design) Control Joint. 1-1/2" deep trowel pint. J/4" x J'-6" long smooth, Trowel 9nlsh a// other ly greased steel dowels edges and pints. Use O 18" ac. 9" embed depth. Northlond Construction Center i, concrete. Dep Bit Groaver trowel, ar equal. RM cmg (north/andcoastruction. con) 2"clea (min.) m Concrete block support (per CS/ reinforcing O Manual of joints MaintainStandard 7�11ealab. J"clearance ProcticeJ (Typ.). te days Formed expansion pint. Use esX,mt non -extruding cell,/or fiber pint, uniform/y roturoted with a halt 9 o/fe,a a m re s'an recovery o/ter cuompression. See se, decal for subbase, design. New Concrete Construction Joint/Control Joint Detail Contractor to use this pinning detail to pin NEW concrete to NEW concrete (walk to walk, walk to buildings, walk to retaining walls, stairs, etc) N. T.5 Drill and insert y4 x 1'-6" long instal/ expansion joint at edge o/ existing concrete Use smooth, steel dowels ®18" o.c, re X—t nor -extruding celu/or fiber )Vint, unifom/y 9" embed depth. Dowels to be saturated ith asphalt, offering o minimum of 7OR /eve/ and centered in concrete. recovery o/tar compression. t "1 Rei,laed q 2" clear (trh.) New Concrete Sidewalk, on New Mu/1-Use Concrete Sidewalk, Y New Heovy Duty Concrete. q (Sea Appropriate Detail for a Exislkrg '" ro Concrete Design) aanare/e -- a •rupl /n reinforcing O ' /nts Moinlain PVC daweh sleeve J a/roronce Concrete block support (per See oppropriote Concrete Cs/ Monuo/ of Detail for subbase design. Stondard practice) (Typ.). Construction Joint Detail for Connection to Existina Concrete Contractor to use this pinning detail to pin NEW concrete to 4-XI577NO concrete (walk to walk, walk to buildings, walk to retaining walls stairs, etc). N. T. S. Concrete Slob - Broom finish concrete - Construction joints shall be spaced mox 24" in a// drections A// concrete used in the construction of See New Concrete Construction Joint Detail concrete sidewalk shall be air entrained - See Site Plan for constructuion pint layout. and mode with Portland cement. The - Sowcut control pints 1-1/2" depth at intervals equal to width concrete shall meet section 541 of the at sidewalk. State of Vermont Standard Specification - Apply 1 coots of Euclid Everc/ear VOX cure/seal compound to for Construction for Class A concrete all concrete surfaces, per the manufacturer's specifications and have 28 day compressive strength - Concrete construction and curing shot/ conform to section of 4,000 psi. 618.03 of the current VAOT Standard Specifications far Construction Note.' Concrete shall be installed in alternating pours at Oner or Contractor is not construction pints Continuous pours through allowed to place deicing construction pints is not allowed. Refer to Concrete materials on newly poured Construction ✓oinf/Control Mint Detail concrete sidewalk for a period of 6 months. 6" As shown on plans 1 6" 6" thick 4, 000 psi concrete. /,stall Orode 6014 bars O Provide expansion pint Concrete block 12" OC E.W placed 2' oriel sealer where concrete support (per CS/ m.) clear from !p o! is against curb w other Manual of Standard °O ° te' concrete foundation. Practice) (Typ.J. No/d reinforcing bock 2. 3" J" /ram ale sites 4' topsoil. see site • • p/on for grading Mirofi S-,,,or 18" !hick crushed grovel subbase (704. 05, approved ,/ 1 line). Subbase shall be from natural _/// grovels and crushed quarried rock only Undisturbed earth or approved Blended concrete or recycled asphalt is fill material compacted to 95Z not allowed standard proctor in 12" lifts. Refer to Concrete Slab Construction Joint/Control Joint Detail New Multi -Use Concrete Sidewalk Detail To be used for concrete sidewalk that is wider than 6' NTS Construction Notes 1. fie methods and materials of construction shall conform to the latest standards of the City of South Bur/ington and the State of Vermont. A// work shall be in conformance with all permits and approvals issued for the project /n case of conflict, the more stringent specification shall apply as directed by Engineer. A// work shall be done in a workmwIlke manner and completed in the time specified by Oner. 2 The Contractor shall be responsible for all work and materials shown and required to make the job complete. These drawings do not show every fitting or appurtenance. Materials shall be os specified on the drawings. Manufacturer's product specifications shall be submitted for a// materials to the Engineer for opprovo/ prior to installation. J. The location and size of existing underground utilities k; not warranted to be exact or complete. The Contractor shall field locate a// utilities and shall contact the offecled ut/Yity company, the Engineer and the City of South Burlington prior to making any hook ups. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for a// existing ull7ilres and their uninterrupted services. A// off -site backtill, sheef/ng and shoring, dew°tering, clearing and grubbing, erosion control, dust control, traffic control, grading, and a// incidentals shall be included as part of the required work. 4. Repair of a// disturbedg, areas, grodnseedng, mulching, repair of roods and curbs, paving, and other incidentals are included as port of the required work. Al/ disturbed oreos shall be loomed and mulched unt# permanent ground cover is established 5 The Contractor shall verify all hor/zonto/ control and temporary bench marks before use. 6 The workers and public shall be protected by the Contractor from any and a// hazards connected with the construction work. Open trenches, materials, or equipment within the working limits ore to be guarded by the use of adequate barricades or /loggers A// barricades left in position overnight ore to be properly lighted. Kerosene pots ore not acceptable. When work narrows the usable pavement, baggers shall be employed to aid the pow of traffic so that there will be no undue delays The Contractor shall be held responsible for the safety of a# workers and the genera/ public and al/ damages to property occurrin from w upon the work occasion negligence 9 P °P y 9 P eel b on shall be held y responsiblef h / f // r w the safety o o workers and thegeneral /i / public and a/ damages to property occurrin from on upon the work occasioned by negligence or day or night within the working area. A// work 9 shall be in conformance to OSHA regulations, Title 19, Parts 1926.651 and 1926652, and applicable 10 VOSHA regulations. 7 Contractor shall contact Dig Sole prior to any excavation. S. Al/ new storm and sanitary extending from structures shall be laid with a pipe loser to elevation and slope as shown on the plans. 9. The Contractor shall sawcut ae existing pavement to be removed The Contractor shall minimize the pavement area disturbance. Contractor shall be responsible for all pavement repair and restoration necessary to complete the work. 10, The Contractor shall be responsible for all construction layout. I7. Temporary silt fence shall be erected prior to any clearing or construction. Fencing may be erected in phases, but in no case shall construction of clearing proceed fencing. Special areas may be designated by the Owner for preservation of existing trees. These areas shall be the Contractors responsibility to Insure no damage is done to designated trees. 12 Existing plantings ore located /n genera/ areas as shown on the plans. Contractor shall protect plantings scheduled 10 remain so as not to damage these or their root systems. IJ Contractor shall comp/y with al/ permits and approvals issued for this project. 14, Contractor shall sign on as the Co-Permiltee for the Stole of Vermont Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control permit for the project. 15 5/.Pe stabAity upon unsoturoted soil conditions. /t during construction saturated soils ore encountered, contact the Engineer fmmed'otely 9t2• paving !o match ex/st/n 6' 1psol/ The Cnon/roctoi shall be rave sib/e / romp/ylag with OSHA - VOSHA unpaved ound r/i I/ y regulations , BakfY/ to wiMkr 6' of finish grade 'th Sand 1, (VAOT 7030% P/oce k, IP' lifts and compact as ' dicoted4�� Iz• ow sl dord proctor inn. yy d O $ a Two _ 1/2" holes 5" on Wrap stone with center. Meo/i drainage fa CIVIL ENGINEER 1/4'toJ/4'Krebe cruhed• stone] m SOR J5 perlooted storm mom. B LenM,g CeneelaM Engineer..washed 164 Mel, Street Sulte 201 CT:(W775P✓C �/��IT: (eo2)e]&oa]5Undsturbed L e F: (802)6]6-g618 mea®x,ebee,menei,e.core i ° O Typical Underdrain Trench Detail N. T.5 PVC SOR 35 / e shall not in / o be sto led when the temperaturer PP d s below 32' F or p goes above 100' F unlessprior o approval is obtained from h n i p pp the E gnerr. Extra care is required when handling PVC pipe during cold weather. PVC pipe shall not be stored outside and exposed to prolonged periods of sunlight as pipe discoloration and reduction /rt pipe impact strength will occur. /f PVC pipe is to be stored on site for 1 month or longer it shall be covered with canvas or other opaque molerio. D+2' ovkr P to motto Bxis1/n 9 The Contractor be responsible far Po ved unpaved ound s/i n1/ with OSHA - VOSHA 9 y eequ/otions Bockfi7/ material under roads or paved areasmust pass Backlr]/ material sho// subgrade proof roll Any onfah, no stones greater 95R 9O� trench area that does not than J" in diameter, n o slondor slondard frozen lumps, proof raj/ shall, doy o organic material. P/ocfow P/octo °u of C of al Contractor's expense, Place in 12" lifts and a have su/licient material compact os indicoled.£ removed and replaced with E acceptable embankment y molerio/ and compacted to provide acceptable proof ro// cond'lions. c114shed 97one' !o lt-e �/2 Storm main and services 6 (A// storm pipe to be SOR Undisturbed mote//ol—�� J5 PVW). ` - PVC with recycled content will not be accepted Typical Storm Trench Detail N. KS ,AP'oP`y m,H �oz G 0 * NO ] '- 5 03 *_ '.cif, 'R{„„ �s.ca�o.•°?4.�a FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE , x:aas xxXxx Catch bosin home and grole - shaft be 6"high Neenah R-J588 frame and Forme with solid cows shelf be -- - -- R-J405-A Type H grate, or 6" nigh heavy duty cost iron Catch bask, frame and grole - .No/ Three (3) flange with H2O wheel food copocify shall be 6" high Neenah R-J588 frames shall be used against Clear penmg shod be 24" min. home and R-J405-A Type H curbs grate, or aqua/ Me" (3) flange 1/2" Radius " frames shall be used ogo/nst a)NIFNI 1/2Radius Sipe See Site Plan Finish grade curbs F,hish �i� ape ro wow, 5/ape�= See S'le P/an _ � .aope ovon Non -shrink growl around cost ion home I ram; l (geo man.) pion Ssl — — Crete geode g. Cost in place Non -shrink grout 4" min. 8" ( max) precast concrete concrete risers may be substituted around cost iron geode ring between cost iron from, CIVIL DETAILS varies Use Class A concrete (4,000 ps) - between cos! bon /same and frame and Precast concrete structure 4•-- T ° 14 -� precast concrete structure Storm manhole and come by Catch bosin by Comp, shah/ contain Comp, SO. leevood, o equal 4' diomeler - ASTM C47B SD. /re/and, on equal. nocktes gria/ o stones greater thou sin diameter, no frozen lumps wet' - PSI O 28 days (min. concrete 24 i14" s ,ore - ASTM per day a organic material. strength) str- concrete - 5 000 PS/ concrete Place in 12" lift, an0 -Stec/ reinforced to ASTM $Dees -Steel rein/arced to ASTM Specs. canpoct as indicated - AASHTO H-20 wheel load - AA TO H-20 wheel hood Cost in place o seal eras sket for o/i pip nec!lons Cost in place or press seal Mastic, b" ring .ge g•o Mkoh' 140N Mastic, O" oskel low a// a connections PP 1vo,/owcs/lsaco 001111 2ma.awy or but rope O Fiow DMI 12-1/2' holes fop inlet ling or bulyt rope. D _ DRAWN BV_ SLM PROJECT NO. KL=75�0 on of ppe 1 -6" Flow j Monolithic hose Fist pint shall / / 24" / / / / `am s at dsae/ / / / damps ° ea Monolithic base 14" / / / / / / / DATE. 0929,,16 be high,/ than � invert out elevation. P c s / / / / / / 3/4" Crushed h°r^ First t shall be higher than / / sump v / / / varies • ° washed stone ° •/°/ invert out elevation. Cushed REVISED. / / / / 12^ m / /°/ /°/ / / / va ° ° u ° s . ° o / / / washed stone SCALE: Aeww lPorhvoted Ppe delod / / 12" typical of al/ krtel pees f 3/4" to 1 1/2" crushed stone l / /� /'� 1 - DAL Undisturbed material 3/4" to 1 1/2" crushed stone V Undisturbed moteria/ yp(cal Catch Bqsin Inlet Inlet Detor/ N. T. S ,Wicol -roo N T. s PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS Construction Notes Me Cn,—" I. be rsyoans2/s le' pp covrsfructkn of —I- main storm nil ,ant! r sew« HNms os shown an the Pons Me C troa/w will be respansfb/e /or a// necessary adopters, fittings, etc. to make connections to the existing and proposed units. The Contractor shall be responsble for ote wa k show or InWied an the Plans and/or referenced in the secifications and permits The Controctor sho// submit, /a opprow/ by the Engineer, o// types of moterfa/s and products used Genera/ Water Main Notes 1. Me Cmlroclw Map c oP,0/e the t—#,Otian/shvtWwn of the —Wi q wore, sv„ce with the South BuNMgfm N6fer Dgiwlmml me Me put fngMe«. 2 s e1�9 'hese p/ohs A"W" desito the gn and ytods 01 role, main b.,Ond 5 it outside ins Dudek,q. Me See Con, or Md/ be respansPb forsP eke ' with./Se/L o/ fine D Admgcprnx/,on wdhm the M'ldMq SeeMxhonicd/P/umOMg EngM_ pions /w scoop design and J L'nlrocfd Mal/ prbNy d/ necessary fittings and appurlWnces to complete the wotee Me cans/ruclim ww4 Mi. includes tempwwy fillings antl gouges necw y /p safwY cwnde/e the MuMMq oclivif/ s reauLetl prig- to mo eq connxlions wile bud q p/umDM,, WC ter Main (APM/ s new --li'c eater moms Wd services) (see also rive s«.ice MoM Notes) 1. Me pee re' wale, moo Mae be elm aLc/4e ism. Duchte kan h'1/Mgr MON can/wen to AWWA allQ J30 Pounds raking wenure. Ydver Mn be ane ec(uro fa µ^t W f ✓Min rood ID WM'A aped/kornn C309 « C5/s ! -i,M mtl sis-inch pyre snox how no has loan 1 Draw wedge, Melbeed of earn qh pipe shop hove ro Mss Mon J wove, Mweivee of earn pmi. 1 AAp ape shill 0, Msfd/o M occa-dance piM AWWA C60. Me pPe shoe be kqp/ Hew o / syn mope, ane debris outing Meroxotian. lout rbe Mocess / PPe l,yk,q nos sopped, any open Wy o/ pipe Md/ be PNggo Mwe shop De , mMWum o/ B'-O• (I B1 m) co,ar o,er all pros and m„<e lines. AnY PPe yaecl! Mdl oar excNd /p/Y (JO.TJ P«cm/ of r«wnmmdsd menu/ /we, i mo..:num deneC/im. a—Aw mofwids me A,--- sisals be os ylodee an Me &owk,gs the CWboc/w MM be res —&' /w ny and Assn-t irq and/ Mwk,g neces y to comply piM OSHA - VaSNA requ/olions J Me test �mq oI the roler moo shoes co 41 a/ Me les/Mq a/ d/ Msto/o ape setts. Wd ny&Wts in occar&nce wile AWWA C600 Me /edk,9 stab sAI // a pres,we 1-1 and Ie Wk lest. a /.sling shoe be daps piM Oo/aye eofe, and k, the presence o/ the Enpnew, ono' rgpresWlolivas Ham Me CRy of 8-#,gin Otter Deaerlmn4 fie wessure lest cons/ is o/ ,akt kk,9 o minimum Mf«nil p,a, prewar. o/ 200 psI Ieb ((140.610 kg/m 2J le' 2)2 ehMe tn/M tasting b,,O_e arias De de/Mo os lne _,,um _iil, o/ roOe p eater Ina/ a added to o pgDNM. una«gnkq 1912) A a Wy vowed seciron 1nWro/, k, roil« I mbk,loM pressure within 4/- 3 Psi or the a M&N, test pressure (.,II, the pPwine has been Idled pi` rofw and the on has been arpwled). No ape Ms/all°lion eve p be Vlee uan it Me qtity a/ mok pen(« is 9r«s/e, loan thin ylermmo by the /oaek,q / /o I = 1wlm9 onoronce (makeup rot 1. m ganms per hour 7 s - Lengfn o/ape feweq ! D - Nominal pips dame/«, M Minas P = ,estop. ferf pressure —9 Me t, Ost— -1 m (gaage) 4 CM Mo/Mg o/ Mes lem slid/be aac p isno ate, Me role, moo nos peen S.--f'py Pressure fes(o ne Mwovglr/y AuMo afsin/x/k,q sod/ be M ncwdnce w63 ah AWWA C-1. Me &sk,_Jnq Mocew Moe De yemo acceploDle anry ape, fro canseclriw rots o/ accapfaye sump/e; lawm Ham the /Nsho sad d—f to moo 24 now, gowf, hae, no e+de,ce of 6""C./—. "./t e,onor, re' paper disk,/ecf km use mmmum IS mpyl M/«Me corrcmHotiwr le' 71 hours Me concenHolkvr must remain above 70 moo Table/ be M/ lino g not ocavebble. 5 Me roles moo Md/ De /hwougyy Hushed wife o minim m Pow roes-,!, Of 23 ill/ ro Haan ZIP mafwkdt -1 or Me wives and lib Dots "I" to 0`1-911 the Cm"Into' and/ cm Mc/ the Own«, ree Deowfmml I,me mnky,d,'/x /he Orshkr Nbl« Super campony, and the Fn9Me«. Fire Service Main 1. fie pPe ear rote, ma, MM be CL52 -clde Hen. Dua/de Hon 1101ps Mo// cal to AWWA CJIO, J50 Pounds working pressure. ✓ores sho// be moms/octpred to mull oil lealk—ts o/ A"A ap—illaotian C509 w C515 2 Ap pyre sho/I be Ms(a/ro M ,ccwonce with AWWA C500. Me pipe shate be keoe /see o/ /we/gn ,afte, one deb,/s d,rmq Msfa//oriwr. !wren (he process mesas /oyirq has dapped, Wy apes, end, o/ pqe tool Oe RN99eq Mere shill be o mmmum o/ 6'-0• cover over ae pp.. d s«vice /' Any paps y0ecfin Mol/ not *_e, /iffy (50-T) Pe,cn/ o/ recwmm—do mnu/aclure,'s m,mmvm ae/le ,,, Bock/d/ _,/ends and Proaeduree Ma/ be as 0.1— aowk,9s Me Con —'a, Mal/ be reed—wo /w any °nil M MN/Mg -I/d sh—, neceeewy fo co ay piM OSHA - WS A requlah-s. 3. Me /esek,9 of Me woe, moo Map ens/sr of Me M"k,o 01 n M,fd/o PPe, —CIS end hywants M accordance pith NFPA 14 fie Ieslmp Md/ Wwrf o1 p pressure ferf we /eakave leaf. A. leeq slid/ be done with pol,oe ro/w and M Me presence o/ the 1' pens. Me pressure l,,, cas/srs o/ m ,—.a o mM:•num Mt—bt P4,e p-esswe or 700 Psi (144620 kg/m'7) f tea (7) haws Me wnant or /.wage al Me 100 ,,Mrs Mall not —~ 2 gtll r per gbwe/s «µOtt kle pecfi,e of pips di —fa,.. t/ Me presses. sup, mess in_ J psi (3315 kq/m 2) M the Rua! hour. Mir cros0/Iles /pour. o/ the lest / the po-/ mfim o/ PPe Future o my fed sec/,m roY necesspole repoi md/w rpMo<m,.nl a/ Me /rota tecftn. 4. ci/ I affkq of /heI ys(w MW De —Pet~ bete, me Bate, mofn nos been succeta/udy pressure fes/o and M«ough/y PvMo Dl'Mf-tMq Mop man c dance with AWWA 0-63/ Me dlM1_1nq Process Mb, be d_,, aeepeole an/y o/le, two so, I, o/ roof« /,_ the /Nino pis#',e[fo fokm 24 of— foots snows no e,d ce o/ boc/«rolpgicd cwfa nMlt , Use mmmum 23 moll cM«me cmc tH° /« 74 haws Me canttmlrorwr must remora oboes /0 m9/7. T~ disk,/ fM9 / not occepfoble. 5 A-,Olab/e wale, main MMk,p requkw ors «arose below. Poiw to 6uMMq, Me cnHoclw MM canrocl me Owner, see Depwlmml M Ins ,crydifx the District Wblw Suably end Me Ergk,ser. UndWground PPMa Ham the water wPMY !o the nlsm ns«, and /eo-M con«fans fo Me .t— 1/se, MbN Oe camPA"e, n sho be/we Me carnecl;on ,s may /a domsfreon tie proreaipr �Iwn pynk,q Me //us-9 ab"tion Mop be cn(Muo to, o suIf;c mt Mn, to ensure lnwou0 deWM9 Me min/mum rate of Pow M." be not less Mn ore of Ins loeowk,g Poe Site now Rph (J) Nydrod/ ally ebeculb- rote, demand Par roN o/ he N(em, MCNOkq a ,• base'eq,—on" (Mo„dre by the a~-') a~-') A _seen (2) row necess y fa O,—ae o „ badr at 10 1r/3ec (JI m/sec) M _dance wiln In, /eoh, 4 'a" Jg0 t4� eB0 .;JJ1 (3) Maximum Pow rate owrYoO/e fo /he n/em under/H. 6 1.12 eondtans B 70J 1. WO 49W Flow Reglked fo Produce o vwociry of 10 /r/ (J m/s) M p 10 BN 7,440 AIM Pe, 12 Jos .X520 I.XyJ General Water Main Notes: All sole' /Me and room w k to be per/ormo M occwdance wiry the Cho doM Wbfw District 4-1rrcolkns nd Deeoet kx the Mslbpolxn o/ Nble, /Mes win Appw/Waxes' hWce/ rn ins CND Spec//koticvn . AN oones/k s«Rees ane eke s/xMk/« sp'_s loaf w cut ecled to the pudic water system sho// be prolecto ncwding to their degree of hotrod. with b bockpow pre veniian assembly. and an opprapdofe fhwmd a P-d Clem. R se —tact M/ eepwlmmr r more m—atkn an bowpoe proltia, ee„ces. Me CND Spxilkotions are ape/,cob/. to ap new croslrvcti n and recWslructkw o, rolW ,n/rostmcf'I vwi"O's / Abe CND Specih'cofiWs wall not be pwm/eto except as ,,omded within the CND ,�eci/ic°bons. Me opprgoriole CIID Supw„se' os de/bled41 the CND Speo6cofiors sho I, lilt the o, V=,'y o/ any bs M"O` tom !hose specihcolian,. P,iwb root« liner one oppurfenbnces snort be designed 10 the awn. "ane ds as pubek rater /tress and a aleeo— All —ter Msldlaleon work and rot« enisfrkufkn —I—e must c ply with the CND Specilicolins" Details /w Mis p,bJmt osf be the some as those eeMM the above r"ermced CND Sped! afkn. Me Prbpct shall be cndrucled, comp/efed, mantomse and ,perofo M b aor - with Me ,pprored pens. No cling., Ma/ be may k, the propel. wiMou! the «i(d- approwl o/ the V bb—te CND su1=.. A copy o/ the /Mal peso rod plans shall be bmafed prior to strucfiW of the water nfem MrpravemWfs. Me above rel mcsd CND Spnif tin, state that no roles lines shall be MsMped Baer November 15 w 6.M . April I piMou( prior pprowl o/ the Sup«m/Won/. Me DPI —Ad, Cfq pwn'sw y reatrkt work behne Novembw 15 and olle, Ap,d / Wring ad—, -be end/ens. Me P,gPWI ownw would nave to era ved. access ro the Deparlmmf /w the morns o/ unde,lokinq wolw d'sNPufen emergency repairs and mok,fmance, bs wawa by Me Litt' ro/W cednance. Access wvuM also hate to be provided to the om-tmmt /w those curb ,lees /ocafo n(sMe the City ROW/ dheann,9 se, 10 qnfBdwgfnlaloteaccounts provMo /hot /he City or Snfh rMuiuwnntr uniMrm free« ne ,ewe, D,:conxr. t. I lth m Seats Statute MAI 24 VS A. Choate, 129, F r-inch nd six-inch pyre sbas how no less then 2 brass weeges Msea/o of each pint. Eight -inch Mpe Ma/ faro no less it- J wedges Msblled v1 each pint. Me South BuNingian Wofw CkporfmW( weinnce stoles fhof All eat« hoes nd appurtenances 01 kaco(o M /he Gty rgAl-ol- ea a pub/k grounds sho/ be cnsa so, priwfe pursuant to the o donee WO athws Of the Cify, We, MI D,pwlmmr Mph not mok,toM any rotes /Mes that have no! / oy been occepto Dy the City, except a subd'„siwrs fhof are design, la Depwlmmf specih'cvlens and are i,'-old a be accepted. nq A// wafer /Mes ane appvrtennces located within n w sa ea desq—to as restricted 0,Priwle by the d's-obes Mot be --Wed a,—te. H'sfwkMy, the South Budk,gfan Nb/W D y«tmenf has poctko overseeing III repo, and oMlnnce o/ a/ ro/er moms and;Xte ances of Hon !nose moos nor lnofo M Me ROW w yedo a— to the City tiller eb,— approval _F J/4• - 11/7• slot- Arro oI Dmswlnq again I d'SlurDed so in Section M,I.— ewM Elevation Ancharooe of %/ves Note I. A thrust block sholl be matoRed of all water main bends, end cops, and tees. 2 Precast thrust blocks are NOT acceptable. J. Red -mix concrete (2,500 psi min) must be used Jar thrust blocks Sacrete is NOT acceptable. 4. Use EBAA Atego-Lug, Sigma, 0, equal, wedge -action mechanical yofnf restrofnts with lw'st off nuts at all fittlrlgs 1 1/2•,tan. use mew -fro .!pines, MMknum n lull login o/PPe (mdilu,Dad sod J/I•-/ I/1' au'led got, GvM.d ,fans wi/n (e ansuppwf e a~(see barks pare vv/va ylod bboro). 6• (152 cvn PJuv ..�'.- ' Io Irmcn roan •.'r (iypMdJ I rind;erarow roe yolw/beod End Reducer UndisfwDo sod No(e: Pobce 4 end. (mMMrum) adye(nyen Mee( befweewr sr di canwere rotas/ w,ck, orM PP % h'f(M9s !o pevWr Dantl. cona.ro of BH enot co — bales, fc. of ingt. -1111.roed rod Tee 90 °, 45 °, 11 112'. or 11 1/4°Bend A,e,hfmr/m Aran nF Rot,.,.,,. c,..i ,•e ..4 r•�____._ r. _.._. 3' 4" 6" B" 12" SpL CON, nLW WARMO toAo(PSr) Q5 Q3 Q5 05 QS 1.0 QS 05 t0 l.3 l.0 p,5 20 25 1.3 J.O 40 53 JO J.3 souse ode IQOOO t0 t0 !O Q5 t3 20 10 Q5 JO 4.0 2p tp 4.3 B.3 J3 2.0 70,011.07.5 40 Q: d 4,000 2.0 QS t3 J.0 J5 Sp JO l.3 B.a BS 5.0 2.5 IJ01B3 100 50 cm�1pgs1 sped J0100 =I. ?.3 J3 10 I.O 55 75 AO 20 9.0IJO 70 JS 027 150 d 50 70 4.0 20 IQ5 J50 BO 4.0 1e075 14. 770 39. 53. 30. 15 son Nay t000 Lwamw„ .ester «.e.rw - xo Ps ry4atm2 keAw'Y / It must be undestoo that this Dw-l—f would an/y prong the se' O/ ov _,9 /be '- ane moMtmmce o, a, wore' moins nil appwtWances ,/lW ro now ln—to and approved the insfallofin of the —11 mom nd ,erne. lines b end the Ott' owno 1-at— MI labor rate would be Ins so s approved M the Mbno9emmi co"'Ict by the Chwnplotn Woler D/sln'cf nil Me City of South Budk,gfn, ren'so Wnuo, % cove re! need labor and molwea charges or 0oifin to any fee "e eat under the South Mudk,g/an fPotw Lk 1w 1 D-&nnce, sucheas but not lkpito fo priest. /,e hyHonls nil ,prink/« nfams. Al lens tkne Priwle /ire hyO unit are orrosred of f,DD P« hyNanf Woad and hie ,prowl« systems we os's.ssed i3a annuoy Cote valves and curb stops outside the C/11 ROW must how a W only Desd bled kv Me South R-HOgton Nat- Deyafmmt to qo#' occew /w pe,olean m emervncies and for discnneceing service ro o"W-1 accounts pro„'o'ta the City o, 5 fh Budingen /a/ows the rea"e'n-ts set rwM M the State Statute nf/e 14 Y.5.4 Chapter 129. YMi! Wo(w and Sewe, Orscn—l'. Me South & H-gfan Nb/er OepartmW/ Ma/ fix —1 any N1we Nord copy pins m-o y in,, project /w reveee Fufure pins must McNy eetows ne specMcoeians as requko in the cave ralmco .soeci/irofims. 3w to MY building cansrmcfem, the building can1-10, must cntacl the S fh Burhngln Wale, Dee e—1 Ia &.cuss City rewakemmt, I -meter dying, metro the, nil back/Pw prevWtion. Me Snlh 6udin9tm Note, Oobo l Wt sho/ be abt~ M prone. to Mspecf oN mechmica pint filings main /ins I Os bppure—es, thmsf blacks, wafer line cr sings, and testing error to —a, w b Mhnq os /t 4 o Naofion to d/xhoge chl-Inlied wafer into wafws Of Me Stale. A// wale, used &nog 1. —9 nd festk,q o, the nee main must be d«newinblo prior mlwk,g any rot« o/ the Slate. A,tw /Ma Mushmg and bet a the new ebtW moM is cb_,olo to the ddnbunan nfem, two ens cutiw sets of 0—t1ble samples, eokn at least 24 haws Wwl, sho/ be tail fed Ham the new —' and su6miffo to the u n1 Health Doportmnl i plays s. Al leas/ set o/ samples shop be cprlecfo Hone y t000 fee of Men wort« main, plus n set /rpm she nil o, Ana line nil of leas! a set Hom I—, bunch wAll sonde'Wort, muse be su .:a to the apes pria/e Deporlmnl p,ior to neneng any cannectMn to a ew'sfing ter line. n Upan c p/efian o1 the cnshuden Piapct, Record Drawings" rho!/ be supplied fo the opprcpriofe C49 p«Hsor M the / a, ne (I) he'd copy and ane wecMank cgoy in Au/o-CAD.aND ✓Wsron 7009 F at w newer. Record Orowngs we to Mc/ode vote lies, and mono1—u— make and coding dale fro a// wee wives Laeaeen ties / be/ curb staps and ro/er shut o/R (N50's) Mal be P,Ov n fine Record or,wmgs. Thrust Block Details Al. T.S. Al/ w/ves sho// be AWWA droved nu/ Iu,ed by Mueller, C/ow Or opprowd equal. All vo/ves sho// be open c 1-clocko, e. Fro'de reflector An ,dance with Municipal Standard ti i 4 Breoko y Al/ woter related work to be performed in BoCkf7/ material under roods or paved areas accordance with the Specifications and must pass subgrade proof fall. Any trench Detof7s /a the /nstollotin of Water lines and area that does not successfully proof roll appurtenances fa all Note, Systems Owed sho//, of the Cwfroctor'r expense, hove by the Chomp/ofn Water District, the City of sufficient material removed and rep/oced with South Bu lingtn, Colchester Ffre District /7, acceptable embankment mot -be and and the t,lloge of Jericho.' compacted to provide acceptable proof roll The Cmbxror sho// be responsb/e for complying with OSHA - VOSHA regulations FMB Dockf7l material sho// contain no stares 9—io, than J" in dfometer, 10 frozen l/—o% cloy a organic feria/ Place in 12" lifts and compact as l rdk.ted D+2' cnd'tfens. paving to match exisffn pawed u powd pond slightly - OUctf/e Aron Wofer/ine shall be paly wrapped Poly wrap B sholl meet ANSI/AWWA F(AAS17 90Ti-dad Y C105/A21.5-05. 6• woter pipe shall have no oracle less than three brass wedges O-T-99) E Ms to/led of each saint. Use on site md"I 2• mol-AW 1 book". hounchmg and Mpfa/ back A// I— . Undisturbed moterio fxcowte trench to support_ bell, uvints, and pPe equal/y (See So. Burl Water Dept. 'E Stondads) 'a Paly -OR all new water moms. Ductile iron, CL 52,, or 2" copper (/ service lino) Compact under pare pr-rd, said cushfn ores /edge Bed copper services fin sand Typical Water Trench Details N. T. S Me C-t—to, Mao be 9 pond p�O1Od wit. OSHA / Wy/A pond slightly repo'at_s / Bandw mohriae shoe Msea O."Ixme rigkl k,sdo/lw, ,w MIpM no slopes grrote, 1.11 width Of trench / eoteene Moo J" k, e/ame1W, n o AB>t 90l loco/o -de, paved w s (:e. roods Hntoy w Ifandard sl-~ roll's Maros etc.) 2mps, wgw,ic ofwid IN-1 M 12'rHs and A'— R—Ior ,rood Dsedkrg Y ' (vAor )0303) 4� • y 7" /nick ewlnuded board, rOe , oonon bawd. Owens Cunk,q Und'slwbo Fownu/w 400 See Otter Trench Det.0 A-11. kan e°/e, pPe above /w odd'eia,d role, Irmo requ—t, Msueo(lon Mal/ be 0— C-9 Rigel F Mw/,lion: F /« 400 Ms✓e'tkw Mal/ be 7" /hick, supp/io M 2w B' w 4i8'Pieces wiM sows pass. Compressive ',Watt Mol/ be a mmmum o/ 40 Pounds pro squwe AA. /NSULA NON /NSTAUA SON. Me Canfioctw must p,Van, the send bo so that w p jeceli s that "Ie"w. with A,---, of k,sWo/ksn bawds we 10 be —4 /wmee' to he wound w as specif/se by Me engine«. Me <m rroclw may not maro a Pmenf w/o I unf3 Me /Hsi 12*—knum, o/ prove/ has ben Mno Typical Insulated Water Trench A// rot« Me nil re/ofo work to be pe,/wmo m accwdcnce wit- the COO 4—Afkofrcns Me Cn"aala sho/ cnfkm h,&—/ specs/icolian with Munieipolity be/ a ordering. Hydrant shall be accordance with AWWA C-502, J- y post to. breakaway, Muet/er Super Centurfan 250, A-413, a Nbterous Pacer with fro 1 ,Ar• hots no -/es and 4 S• pump« na,ree. Secure burlap bog o *hj't yruntil Placed ,10 se,wc ese,w a ObroM an o/ vranr Ham _ /' tan Nbter D �t ' l ter /o ad«inp. Adria"t, cas1-1- IaYe eox�irn � eked ter' typfca a// w/-7 Wofa .in NTS Fire hyaont assemblies Shol/ consist of on anchor I— err o Seiww ✓ant Hydrant TM, o six inch RW gore w/% the appropriate length o/ 6" of pipe secured to the gate w/ve ;in the tpo"p"We ,etoMer glands, the Bre hy,*ant and appropriate thrust black. A// hydrnts shop meet CND specificoffns and Map be Mugged prior to #'stallati— Wolerous fine hydrants must be #'staled with o 'Bostn operotMg Nut. " earth, fyp/col #'rust block 6' ai. a51 worn T •'• Cnaete thrust &lock u adulbed material. (see defa/) (see thrust block defog) canpoc(ed graver •J14" coshed r/one Hydn1 fee. A// h,,&-I &sins sho// 1 52" o/ J 4" Vo1w baled to h t Anchor tee a Iue ill, FP,ter be .0-1/y plugged 7ne under wive n tee adopter. Use J and pdyefhy/ens between canaete and filling (Opico) Typical Hydrant & Gate Valve Assembly N. Ts. tractor shay P—Oe, w' g ties la o// water line bends and elbows. 2 All M✓ glnds sho/ be 14egau9' or pproved equal J Mechanko/ pint restro#'Is with tW40 off nuts shall be EBAA, 5'9mo, or vpprowed equal CIVIL ENGINEER Krabe a Cohere ConeWerq Enwre, ins: 16, Meln Sirwl, Salle 201 Cokhaeler, VT O(AA8 L . T (802)8718 75 F'1802)8TBA818 meil(�krabeendlarreirgconi .SS�aO XfV �pn''�[ryr. * J NO 5703 *E '•'/rs/oNn� FOR PERMIT REVIEW LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Budington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE KXKKK CONTFNT CIVIL DETAILS DRAWN BY. SLM PROJECT NO KLOM DATE. 0S2W16 REVISED SCALE. AB salsa CD-3 Prof t Prase PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS C Testing and Contractor Coordination Requirements (QpOties to water and sonitory sewV 1. A// water lines and sewer lines shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Environmental Protection Rules (09129107), and the Chapter 21 Woter Supply Rules (the more stringent rule shall apply). 2. All private or municpal wote lines shall be tested by the Contractor in occordance with the procedures outlined to AWWA C600 and/or NFPA 24 J No wafer main shall be closer than ten (10) feel to any sanitory, sewer or sanitary manhole and hive (5) feel to any catch bask, or storm sewer line. Provide minimum of t8" vertical separation between woter main and storm/sanitary sewer crossing. 4. The Contractor shall be responsible for construction ors-builts to service locations and any water main fittings. As-builts shall be recorded in accordance with the outlined procedures. 5. The Contractor shot/ be responsible for contacting Engineer at least 24 hours prior to starting construction on any portion of the exterior water or sanitary systems. This notification requirement sholl continue to the completion of the water and sanitary systems. /' nt in with h Engineer and the Munic' alit Publ;c Wanks Th r I / be responsible far scheduling water and so to lest t the E 6. UtiBt Teslm . e Conl arc ar shol p Y 9 sP 9 Y 9• 9 Y Deportment, of o minimum of 24 Aours prior for the test. Based on availability o/ Engineer"s slat/, the Engineer shall accommodate the testing schedule within 24 hours of the Contractor requested test dote/time. 7 fie Contractor shallpre-lest water for 2 hours. The Contractor shall notify Engineer immediately if pre -test failed 8. The Contractor shall immediately contact the Engineer if pre -scheduled testing and/or water/sewer construction is canceled /f Contractor does not contact Engineer and Engineer visits the site the Contractor shall be resoonslb/e far Engineer's fees/m/Yeoge for site visit. 9. The Contractor shall coardinote water construction with the South Burlington Waler Department. The Contractor shall leave thrust blocks and other required sections of new fine exposed until City has inspected and approved it. NOTES /. The focolion of sewn mains to re/otfon to water mains shall be in accordance with the Recommended Stondords for Sewage Works" so -tolled Ten Stole Standards and Water Supp/y Rules. 2 Sonitoey sewers shall be laid at least 10 feet horizontally from any existing or proposed water moth. The distance shot be measured edge to edge. If this d'stonce cannot be obtained variance shall be approved by the ANR Onnking Woter R Groundwater Protection Division. J 18" seporolion shall be maintained whether water is over or under sewer /f this distance cannot be abtolned then a solid 20 ff.. long ppe sleeve may be tnslolled centered on the cfossfng. This may only be dope with approval from the Engineer. Wote, main 19" min. Select backfll compocfed in 6" (15.2 cm) O Sewer layers-95Z standard proctor density. Sewer / Water Separation Detail IV. TS From ond solid cover shall be 6" high cost iron with H2O wheel load capacity Geer Fni-A opening shall be 24" min. Cover to be marked SENER` l Mope to coin &-I come to cost A, p/oc oncrere ri 6. T° Provide cost in place steps when depth exceeds 6' Iran her to invert Use 112" pd5p,0owene plastic rungs J- withh 1/2` plade 60 slee/ r ' f cement egad. All monhole lift holes sholl be grouted h-de and out with expondob/e grout. 5' Asphalt cooled 0— A Con-ete - red h-dened t kk B" min. shelf and 'in vat Shd/ sho# be a m 2/J of ppe dtaneler. 4 L° ra�� 12-inn• Stainless steel topping s/&eves and topping valves shall be poly wrapped Poly wrap shall meet ANS//AWWA C105/A21.5-05. Thrust block Existing water main � Prior to lapping the oh, o 200 psi hydrostatic test shall be performed on the valve and sleeve assembly The test pressure shall be maintained for o minimum JO minutes without any pressure drop. New 6" water service Contact Champlain Water District and the Engineer 48 hours prior to top. Sanitary Testing Requirements 1. A# sewer lines and manholes shall be thoroughly tested by the Contractor in accordance with the Envronmental Protection Rules (09129107) 2 Al/ sanitary manholes shall be vacuum tested in the presence of the Engineer. The structure shall be tested prior to bockhl/ with the lowest seam exposed Test procedures and pressure shall be determined /nint/y by the local approval agency and the Engineer Failure of any vacuum lest shall necessitate repair and/or replacement of the structure and retest Nbter testing manholes is not acceptable. J. All sanitary mains shall be air tested to the presence of the Engineer. At a mtMmum, the test pressure shall be 4 pounds per square inch at the highest point olong the test /or 4 minutes. 4. Utility Testing. the Contractor shall be responsible far scheduling sonitoy telling at a minimum of 24 hours prior to the test Based on omdability of Engineer's staff, the Engineer shall accommodate the testing schedule within 24 hours of the Contractor requested test dote/time. * The Contractor shall /mmed'oteJy contact the Engineer it pre -scheduled testing ond/ar wafer/sewer construction is canceled /f Contractor does not contact Engineer and Engineer visits the site, the Contractor shall be responsible for Engineer's lees/mileage for site wsi1. Install o minimum 6" thick concrete grade ring on each structure. Use doss A concrete (4, 000 ps) between cost bon frame and concrete catch basin - precast --te riser rkg. - goproved equal Brick and mot- fs not acceptable Sewer manhole and cover by Carp. S.D. Ireland - squall. ASTM spec. C478 - 4,000 PS/ carcrete Steel rein!deed to ASTM Specs - AASHTO H-20 heel load O• Ring gasket - Mastic Do not m-tor inside face of mothole. �wMaphds sho# be vacuum tested ere lowest jaipt is s1.V &posed prosence of Engkow,. s. En9neer /a, lestmg reg."vnenle. Cost in place - Press -led gasket f- o// pp. PeneNoliars. F/ow Bose section �J14" to 1 112" auslied /Mdfslurbed c pacled stone material Typical Precast Sewer Manhole NTS A# water /me and related work to be perlarmed in accordance with the Chomploin Water District $oecilicotions and Details for the /nsfol/otton of N•oter lines and Appurtenances." Topping s/eeve shall be stainless steel with flanged out/et. Tapping sleeve shall conform to Section 8. 00, 809, and 8/0 of the Chomploin woter District Specifications and Oetoi/s for the Installation of Water Lines and G Appurtenances, "doted March 2013. Wet top shall be into/led by persons approved by Champ/o/n Water District Relon Division and the Engineer. Typical Tapq Sleeve and Valve N. T.5, Msto# slot+/ess steN- a Wchpe 6 onM- stew over vertfcd &end Secure strop to concrete thmsr 61-k. Rod c/o p wedge tram Mar. 22w-I_ M✓ Bends trainer d rh tram (mega-/u e�a _t'o0ls. Mega A _W approved octal) approved sgaol 1 \ New ovclde iron water moin (fu# length of ppe enlerkrq and entmg the wrticel bend) �J/4" threaded roddfng full length clomp 4/4" threaded All rodd/ng and rodd'n 9 hardware must be slofnlees steel J1 4" lhreoded-' "- r dding full length Thrust block, sae detail of pipe. Notes., I. See thrust block defer fa odditlonol ,n/ otion. 2 Prior to pouring thrust blocks. o// fillings ore to be wrapped with 4 mil pa/yethy4ene Vertical Bend Thrust Block Restraint Detail N. T. S. 1. Gate valves shall be meet a// requirements of A. W. W.A. C509 and C515 Standards (latest edition) halves with mechanical pints of sizes as required on the plans. 2 Aft valves shall be of cast or ductile iron body and shall be cooled with fusion bonded epoxy complying with AWWA C-550 and be NSF 61 opproved Volve shalt have monufoctur-r , name, pressure rating, and manufacture date cost on the body. J All valves shalt include non -using stem, high strength bronze stem and nut, 100X coated wedge, O" Ring Stem Seats above and below the thrust calla. 0 2" square operating nut, mechanical pint ends, and corrosion resistant stainless steel body bolts and nuts. 4. Dote valves shot/ open counter-c/ockwtse (left) and be designed with a 250 psi standard working pressure rating. 5 valves shot/ be equpoed with o two piece, sliding type cost iron valve box far a minimum 6 ft. of cover material. t k iron `WATER` mar c ow marked Finish —do- Adjustable cost iron 5 1/4" diameter valve box 5' m;k cover re as /in�) �2" square opening nut ,line Use wedge aclfbn (Mega -Lug, a opa-ved equo/) -lo/her q/onds CIVIL L ENGINEER I I Krebs B a Conw/ti$ Engine IMein ers ,. Maln,heet Suite 201 CT.:W )87 375 L e T (W2Ie]ea�]e F. 1802t,]&Be19 mall®krebeendlanairp.com H..o` _* NO 5703 R Rio �uSi�EPE+p'24.\ ,roEijS�ONAL11 FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE t xxxxx XVXX `J/4`-1 112" Crushed stone from bottom of trench to Undisruree0 son midpoiht of waI- moin. jl2ical Resilient Wedae Gate Valve CONTENT N.TS PVC SDR J5 pipe shall not be installed when the temperature drops below 32' F or goes above 100' F unless prior approval is obtained from the Engineer Extra core is required when handling PVC pipe during cold weather PVC pipe shall not be stored outside and exposed to prolonged periods of sunlight as pipe discoloration and reduction in pipe impact CIVIL DETAILS strength will occur. If PVC ppe is to be stored on site far 1 month or longer it shall be covered with canvas or other opaque material. PAw mFNT CROSS COUNTRY 0�2' ®g fie Contractor shalt be povipg to match existm pavement 1 responsib/e !or complying paved Ke unpaved mound "'olit/y sl4 1 with OSHA - VOSHA Valve cover marked /" regulations. �, Sewer" ar Storm" Watertight threaded Cop marked C/eanouf" Bocklil/ material under �y according to use. roods a paved ardor proo/ must pass -bgrreach Bockfl/ material sho// 95.5' gpx o Cost iron valve box 45' bell and s of elbow Pig tssooNvasftsspo o.taa. zms.a.a area tall. Any Trench oleo that contain no stones greater stondaro stendord. top ar approved equal. DRAWN sr. Sw does not successful/ y than J" in diameter, no prod- proctor $ proof roll shall, of the frozen lumps cloy or Fiber packing between Contractors expense, hovel a/ganfc material. pipe and valve box. PVC SOR 35 PROJECT NO KL=15300 sufficient material removed and replaced with Place in 12" lifts and compact as indicated. .� E 4" PW SOR J5 DATE OWMI6 acceptable embankment �n material and compacted to -2" REVISED provide acceptable proof ,all conditions Y 1/4" to 3/4" Bow scA As m� crushed slone for t sonitory " PVC SDI? J5 sanitary 45' wye far in line c/eonouts 6' undisturbed material —.- Pipe shun conform to ASTM Specilcotion 0-J0J4 or F679, (PVC) 45' bell and spigot far terminal CD -4 Sewer Pipe anal Fittings SORJ5, c/eanouts PW ppe with recycled content will not be accepted Storm/Sanitary Sewer Cleanout Detail PrnI�1PM1�a Typical Sanitary Trench Detail N. Ts PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS N.Ts ra to t' I Faroboy ----- Top of weir to be of 2 water surface elowbon )� Undisturbed Soil (bottom of Pond) M woof —12' thick Type I Stone / 77 _Pond Weir Cross Section Detail N. rs B 6•me 5 A �?A End secti - 6 m I!l Storm vote" Aow .I \ �24' deep Type / stone per Vt. Spec. 706. 04 Mf fl 14M NndNr and i of stane— As shown on plans Section A -A Pipe si— ra-4. ll—See Plonx / -- New end sect on a 1 \� NMfa o taw ohevrr See • hb AM. �'� Mk.# t4aV or goprowd dWaf ATA* www Md to sides of rSOC&I07 B—B 5gkq/ End Section with Rip Rap Detail N. rs Use stainless steel meta/ threaded Lbmsefor ssca4n fastener I color HDPE L`, c A/temots Cawnectlons i 1 I i I � NOIBS• End sections shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturers insta/lotion specifications. AliW Reinforced edge a roe bwoh i7matlaw cmheator seatian C P/OO Diametar Dknens/ens A B c D lit Max. 11t 1 1/2't la 112 14.5 JJ e 12 {2 14.5 JJ 6 IS II 19 Js 6 18 19 22 4J 6 24 59.5 28 48 6 Jo 66 J6 6.15 6 J5 L e B 1 HDPE End Section Detail N. rs concrote rounded smooth 6" Sch 40 gaf—lied steel pipe balWd, concrete Wad 42e Fnlsh to remain golmnized (Do not point) Trgpered away from pipe e I—Fnish grade /ocnred n concrete 54 Fill with concrete 1 _Bollard Detail N Ts w,roe 9 peupe prwrAee mml AM Aav on fM Na]f aM aLtre W aem took tuna SbaeN Porab ro Iene uelp a tgpw 25' SaxatNNmNNan n ne Aft of afa,h— andhAuwEMN(1A1rnG amnrNpaheo ra,p.9aaalDd�rofipl— �*—kg amp* eA"*trle a* v _ p/s I' h Storm PM 0.. _ NbM 9rre v E4fete kart Jteetr paW at 4' dabw to ON, /�/i' gdKsrAre stet I praaLl (t.ro eta»pl u u Trash Roock�-Front Kew M rs x gouge Baran w AV,, swot and a'W- a1 root fiance .S r to tees ustq 9 gaups rum fNs (11' max goxhp} 'i�ii'i00wii'i'i'!i��✓ieii�i'i'i�ieiiii I t+ 77. F�OO�e0ee00�see�G�P �esesssee�see4see�t(12 TrashR♦ Plan Mrs e R .6— P.W. N tuns u—v 9 9alge aWntwm Rba (11=mar 9% 7.b fqs res ponsM fogsfhr, OP. l-5/e' 9rro'raed stoop pwf tanw W-d eMs finer bvN reset Refs shot M awbed I hm Ms wore (i' 4hen/. Pala's J- bdbw preen and tart E ,e�eyr recMfrp nays 1y, POe W not Aanm! hro Anm Parr et hoer 6' 6abw sere- uMpcewhd 9rarxrd Adyrirhp e]h a+ar a eemarmrz 9rraawd a 4ur6xn .tees ro .sfr o6rr. NVdM Pb+ .tar a axrorfsM ooeAwt New Trash Rack — Section Kew Mrs I\"II. ENGINEER Krebs 8 LenYnp CSk.t, lg Erpineare, Inc. 1- w Skeet,SWb I Il DW-N, CokhesMr, VT a6448 (BOI, 6]ee316 L F'_I6op16]�a116 maila]- lMl. cam SE ��ERMry *~P NO 570 �ry* ] o FOR PERMIT REVIEW LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE i xxxxx xxxxx CIVIL DETAILS DRAWN BY. 6LM PROJECT NO KL=15300 DATE. CVM16 REVISED SCALE. As mlvxl CD-5 P'l 1 Phase PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes 1. Carbeater shaft be -vona0/ far -,W*r eYM as More and Lace w-I- x,-66n and sad*ne,t wnhW etorabds oW psnnit reaukemnh Awiq aors6rrc8an. 2. Me /hrit of d/ hirbenw ~ be dwHy oaMed by Cmboctwe wry rr ono, to tlsarnq. E kr, ard sN -t -h'al de.:cea shoo be eelobli.,ed to bap sed*nant m its .S AN wosia, contra,' rid/ be pia o' as, In , m Me ale figs a as ad ed by the Engner Me Cmb«ro s6ab moh1'. Me woskn canna meawres mid the Engineer /s so11SAW Mar pe n-t ground wars /s eslabbshW ord Mat furthe, m«war are nit reouked it shoo be Me reyooisbnty of Me Cmh-to- to enp/oy yaaatate wagon c bro' os shover m times off 9' -d my oMw meawraa ass n«every M tap sedknart or sit. A AN ova' of eerurbmw sod/ be pe-i-ffY a w twnpaiy stabN/ssd an a, soar o: passb✓e d wthh 48 hours of Rod p-bg. AN ar«s of dtshxborw Ndr be at least tw.wa-arty etmauW wthn 14 dote of m/1M d4hx,&wlce Any Maturbonw one, /4 crosewb'w doge of'.,pored east rid/ b. stabdrred doily -/sal Me W--g saceptionr qp'y I. Slobdirobm is not reau if eagle it to canthae h the area h the nest 24 hours and Mere w no -Rai t1w A,-ast err the next 14 hours 2. StablIbar n not req„*ed /f the work / oeewrhq *, o .ee'f-eoltahW ercowban (ore no tlerJ with a depth a 2 itt or greater (q. haves fovndatkn arc tar , uMry bw,c as) Sbbdbetlan eosww chaff hoods moods ard netthg wnske, con6W match¢ washed atone. 9mw; a oa--t. 5 pefs- M Me to. R/ak Sits Ronabook to, Eroioa Prewnbion -d Sedhnort CmbW to, occaptob/e -hroes of atobdl-ti- e. Me Cmbacte, sins'/ - water A, e„t cm6o'. 7 Me Coeb«tr shoo d. 'Net prof«clan around d/ catch bash' iemb,g r ns J Mat aeff-t =troche, site 'lomwate, nano// 0-hea .'tans :+ter p-oe«Mn may a area' h --powd e A stabdime' car sb ,cbw, mbriw (See DeIN) shoo be hstooed and mohrloh d of a1' cam buCt e,, access /bo, I,. Cb,,&Wta Nob be, M amsb/e lo• hstaYhq ova,W stars to proMds stable areas kw c 1w 11on wintere tmf&,, stoghg, and stooge. the Cmtrecto is rwwaon.W. fo--Wdhg ord mohrohhD wfetlenl .fare to prevent rutthq and ratM-t bowing 9. AN poled roods used by -,sbocho,, w ,,lw i,ow be swept day'k-g R-o' of mt- ma6-hai, e, of o greote, new- X if dkt a q,aM is &.,*ed fan the ice. Ms 'eeef Jeeds ~ be-dQ'tdy rwn.v ear, Me curb face if gakode. !O AN ten -y waabn and sad -t -ber meowres she/be rwnowd w h. 30 dais after ,&rd atob l-bra, e, afte, Me m«spss ere ,. /saga- -erg -/ass aMwwx ouMCH-d. 1/. AN xeNnmf rwnowd ban se*nenl -&tr r pratelees ~ be p✓aeW m m op -i sw' d/.Wosd 12. AN a«s Mot do not haw aeladi.MW wgalokrr han by actabe, 15M must be stabd,,.d in «ce,dmw with the Wier Cmsi-tlm Rput. NstW m this sheet. /.i Alter pwmmw,t 'cooing Me Cmbecto shoo be n:pmsb/s to, wotwhq. /f neceve,y, la enaun edea,ole w9e1oliw 9-M. 1A wbtr sari dewatwhg oo moor that save on 'It. must be deac ebter must not bs pumped into :tams .sears k*- or eaffords aniers Me water is d- ,5 the c-batter shtl/ be repmsdde fir a hq,«lino and mohtena,ce of Me e,osnn lire- fi-ord sea ,-t contra✓ o,-Scow hex Me p%wct. 1,, b tiars ard caresoardhg reax& NW/ be -Ax-�at ean(ins a N- saes a Beek ord one, e Y o-pilotim event Mal sew/tor h a Me pw*nerar of Ms ale ord oe 6aPf a l' be, hie ted at the wM of soot wkaby to ensure that .aek art wan nor /eow Me ar, It sedh w l ha, hawed be,,oid Me ate bwnda y,, it .NON be s-t g o otherwise removed and depoaled m-ire h m ,pp earw f a,ea at Me end of eosin -*eon Straw watt/es may be used as --bstftute far sit f-- 1Fr areas mpromat by the Engineer. NO7r, 1. Obstructor she/ be nwonsh/e Ar the hsldlall." mohtnance asd removal of Of fence in d/ I -Hass shown On Me plans 2 Ifohtnanae she'/ be perlb-od - needed and mots-Fo' removed when sedknent roaches half of habrk h*19W. Remove Wood stokes d- on Ot fence after wcro.slu/ establishment of-getatlas. down slope side of fence / Alroh 100x filter fabric Stop/e fabric to wood stake Stoke- Fawn 6- (min.) deep french o /ayfabric in om bottver with --site material. clan I Ba//aSt /1' silt fence is to, instal d when ground seCN007 A -A is frozen, a grow/ or send ballast must be used. A /M/ro6 100, flte fobfk attached to stokes on ups/ope side. A Silt fence spacing chart Slope //t fence spacing SX to IOX 50 ft. or less 109 to 20X 25 H. or /ass > 2OX 15 ft. or less T ico/ TemoororY Si/t Fence Mrs North American Green S758N Motwrlgl content Straw 100X (50 AM/iq..pd) (27 k9/-2) Netting Leno woven 10/1X bbdegradoble Mite fiber Weight approximately 1.64 bs/1000 al.. 7lnlrod S-aeg odob/e installed - per-hicturwir 49danReatkas. Moteriot Specifications Erosion enbW blanket shalt be a machhe-produced mot of 100X agricultural strove The blanket shall be of consistent thickness with the straw evn/y distributed over the mtee oreo of the mat fie blanket shall be covered an the top side with natural fiber netting having on approximate 1/2' X 112' mesh and be sei together with biodegradable thread. Straw erasion control blanket shall be S758N as manufactured by North American bear,, Inc. (812-667-6632) or equiw/est. Erosion control blanket sho// hove the following propetier Erosion Control Matting Ex9sthg pawwnnt ' ,� ar roadway _ 40' Existing ground AL 7DPNA7E- Secure 'Marsh Mof' or - approved equal coin inlet filter over catch basin,4fitte, Btom of Ogwesskaa should Mirofi SOOX fabric -Ill Provide appropriate 2 N. min. ham edge of tfonsition between Inlet Protecch bar*, rkn. Stabilized Construction Entrance, and roadway (Pavement Are 40• min shallow depress,- „ awrnd yore 12' Ianions tact Prot. T as kut y/a'o' S�1to' anh. rod lk-W 'M rsh Met-C shed :tarecpprowd equal cok k1/et P/on YAOT 70417 own catch bask, vote Not. - Contractor shall be responsibh for the Installation, mohtnmce and removal of o stali//zed const-ctf- entrance of each constructhn entrance far the proect The Construction Stobd/zed Entrance and its continued maintenance sho// be a minimum measure to prevent troahnq of sediment off -site. - Contractor to use M-fl 500 under stone far temporary e-struet/- roods - Stabilized construction entrances shot/ be spoked when raids ace BDX AAed with sediment Repok she/ include adding additional 4' minus crushed stone rid/a removal of contaminated stone. THIS DETAIL TO BE USED FOR ALL TEMPORARY STONE STABILIZA77ON AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS Temporary Stabilized Construction Entrance & Staging Areas Mrs Tree Protection & Londscooe C/earin 1. A// frees to be snood within Me designated construct/an z-e and within 10 feet of the construction zone shall be protected by no less than 4' high plastic /encing of the aria fine completely encompassing the tore. No storage of budding materials shall be allowed within tree protection fencing. 2 Damage caused to spe:/rnens due to contractor negligence shall be replaced of the cast of the cmtractor. 3. if equiment /s allowed. with prior approval ham the Owner and Engineer, to pass over a trees root z-e, then a minimum of B' of wood chips shot/ be fold and maintained by the contractor 4. Any tree pruning shall be done by o qualified contractor 5. Durisg excerati-, if roof impact is unowidchfe my root system encountered which /s 1' in diameter or larger will be pruned by wthorAred personnel only. ANA stmdads far foot pruning shall be followed. 6. Where an existing tree meets new fondscopinq, grade topsoll at a depth of 4' (four fiches) from the okp the to 0- (zero iches) at the base of the tree. Mohtah shadow depress!- P/OI d Pate -tA pav hg -d,`br Mot stalbA/mfkvl 9MVI- dgoressi- Am attuned AWst aavnd grate sal _ err e• C-,shed stone, Bottom rAOT 70A f 17 esslm .h-ld be 2 H. mh. Catch BOeil b edge of catch bash, r*n. Sec site p/- to, aze of r{a np h/et protect/ . Catch Basin In/et Protection CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT NOTES Me Contractor shalt be responsible for al/ cansbucltas stakeout for the prtpct. line Engines shall provide the Cantractar an AutoCAD R2010 orowhg of the site des/gn. The drawing will hdude horizontal and vertical survey contra Additional survey control wall be the-Wonstbdity of the C-tractor. 1. line C-tracts shall be respmsb/e for using proper wary equipment and having property trained personnel to use this infcwmolion. Any C-tractor that does not how prgoa equipment or personnel shall subcontract the work to a casnpetenco t nsultant. 2 The horiz-tor control datum may be based an o coordJnote system that is unique far this protbct Proivct north may not refs to astronomic or magnetic north. J. The C-tractor shall check the htegri'ty of wrvey control points by oceupXnq a control point ch-khg distance to bock sight and checking distance and mg/e to another control pant prig to my constructim stakeout fie contractor she/ not proceed with stakeout /f elthe measured distances or angles do not match calculated values 4. bgoh/cal images of hlrostructure h the AutoCAD drawing may not be In an accurate represntatJm of its size. It Is the Cmtroctor', responsibility to verify size and shape of aq items to be stoked out. 5. After completion of radial stakeout with the surmy transit, the Contractor shot check each stakeout Pohl as necessory to w 4y the horizontal and arnica position of the point and that it Is tarred m rslotionshgo to the rest of the propct. 6. fie Contractor shall complete all construction stakeout to an accuracy of 0.1 feet (excluding budding stakeout which shall require o finer accuracy). Soi/ and Seeding Notes I. Tqua *hie how o mirhwm 4e dIWM unless oddtimal depth is specifled on Me Q'vi or Landscape plows Topsoil shall be natural fertft #k&e sad ropresentot/w of local productive so# and free of day lumps stases, wbsa a othar foreign matter larger than 112 inch diameter, not frozen ar muddy. Acidity pH shall range from 5.5 to 7 and shoes contain 4X organic matef/a - o mkrbnum. 2. fie Contractor shall how a sod mays/s pehumed on the tWwll (UW soil testing lob 656-3030). All testing costs wall be paid by Contractor the results of sod analmis shall be provided to the Engineer fir approvalthe sod ondysis must stotw a. Percentoges of organic matte, inorganic matter (silt day, and sand), de/eteious materials, and pH /ew/s A Sieve molys/s and mhea and plant nutrient content of top"A c Test lar herbicide cmtanhotion and provide report ce-hlNng that no herbicides ore present. d State quantities of nitrogenlimestone , phosphorous, and potash nutrients and my aluminum sulfate , a other sod anendwwts to be added to produce satisfactory topsoil . Topsail shall meet the Wowing gradation: Sem 57er Poss/no: CiVIi. EKGiNSF.k Pe tone 1 inch 100X 1/2 inch 95-100X Krebs & Len&rig C- W&q Engineers Inc. 1es Mon so-«1. sutra. No. 4 75-IXX No. 10 60-100X Cakneerer, vi o5aae T. 19oz)916a015 No. 200 10-60X F leozl aria -gale email®K,ebeanalanailg cam 3 Commercial / Olizer shall be o complete plant food containing nitrogen (50X organic) phosphoric acid and potash. Soi/ tests will indicate composition required. 4. Hykio sesdhg and toc/fl- is Me r.Wkvd proctke fir turf estalW/ebment. Spec/flcotions area "ulaF ll'E1n, Ferhlizar, 19-19-19 75 /bs par 1,000 gallons of water Lime: 100 lb. per- 1,000 gal/one of water Seed 6 /bs per 1,000 square het' -* NO 3703 71. 45X Man. Futura 3000 Par Rye Gross Germ: 90X c �= 1AB1X Mh. D).nosty Tod Fescue Gann: 90X .9 74X Mh. Clwphg Red Fescue Germ: 90X 2 2,i2X Max &W 1. SIX Mow. inert unm m a�• 0.01SX Max: Wood Ahr/ch: .700 AM per 1,000 gallows of wafer. Tocihr: 5 ins per /,000 gag-s of water. FOR PERMIT REVIEW Mawfochser's tog .Shea be given 10 Engines has gaprovrd S Areas hamhg wl carpeabba or a resin of cmeftchim &W be azta=Lft ,pr/o- to seeding 6. // hand seeding, only straw mulch Ae to be used and secured by netting either organic or haganfc. /f horganic Is used /t must be removed before the frst mowing. 7 starter /ertdiza x0rair be 40WA d at the mmufocturar'' suggested rote of the time of seeding. Ferti/ze app/kotiorr wM not be allowed it sensitive areas and adjacent to drainage ways as determined by the Engheer. B Watering is to be done by Me Contractor and is to lost for the duration of the warranty period to maintain proper growth. Water and all cpaorotus notes- y to apply the water must be film/shed by the Contractor (i.e. hoses, spf/;k/erx etc). 9 Staking of all topsoded seas to control foot Imilk will be required. Unless otherwise specified, LARKIN e acceptable stoking mot/als wAl be grade stokes and twine or strhg with flfor attached fiv4seTERRACE bd/ty. !O. A guarantee of gross establishment through the first mowing is requred. Any sparse or bore areas larger than I sqft. are to be redone. Wmas, crob gross dndelims dove. and other Route 7, Shelburne Road, South rim -gross spaces are not acceptable for gross establishment and shot/ be rapn/rod Burlington, VF It. fie Cantractor is responsh/e far the fast mowing. After the first mowing and prior to the Owner taking responsbd/ty for Me Iowa areas the Owner or an Owners repmsentot/ve and the Contractor shall meet to inspect the myelahba establishment 12Cantroctor on is rospr/ble for all topsnA to comp/ate the propel os shown. // existing volume of NO. DESCRIPTION DATE topsoll is Inadequate, the Contractor shall purchase ofhite goprowd tcpw# as necessary I l xxxxx xxxxx Winter Construction Requirements (October 151h -April 15th) 1. Far aces to be stabs/zed with vegetative cows, seeding shall be ccvnpfeled no later than September I&A to ensure adequate growth and cover. - 2 /f seeding /s not completed by September 15th, additional non-regetotim protection must be used to stabA/ze the site fix the winter period 7his includes the use of Erosion Control Matting or netting of o heavy mulch kyo: J Where mulch /s used for temporary stobIll"tiorl 11 must be applied at double the standard rate, or -- o minmum of 3 arches with an 8OX-90X come, 4 Stobillzed Construction Entrances shall be enlarged to provide for snow stockpA/ng. 5 Limits of disturbance shall be moved or rep/aced to reflect my revised boundaries of whte work. 6. Me site shall be managed to provide adequate now storage and control of meltwotw.. Cleared snow shall be stored down slope of all oreos of disturbance and out of stcwrnwatar treatment structures. CIVIL DETAILS 7 A minimum 25 loot buffer shall be maintained from perimeter controls such as slit fence. B. Drainage structures must be kept open and free of .mow and ice dmw. 9. S//t hate and oMe practices requiring earth disturbance must be Installed ahead of froze ground 10 To ensure cover of disturbed sad in advance of a melt event areas of disturbed sod must be stabilized of the rid of each work day, with the fallowing excgoHons, - if no preCOdotinn within 24 hours Is forecast and work wolf rewme in the sane disturbed orea within 24 hour; dozy stabdiznti- is not necessary. - Disturbed areas that collect and rotor; runoff, such as house foundolim cr open utidv troches 11. Prior to stobOl"Man, snow Or ice must be ramored to less than 1 inch ffikiness I DRAWN BY SLM 12. Use stone to stabilize areas such as the perimeter of buildings under construction or where I PROJECT NO. KL=15300 construction mh/c/e baf& is anticpated. Stone paths should be 10-20 feet wide to accommodate whkular traffic' IDATE. OWMI6 SCAt F As rase CD-6 PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS r The Low Risk Site Handbook for Eroalon Prevention and sediment Control �V'ERMO\T .9,J$1 2006 3. Stabilize Construction Entrance Purpose. dam van c e wnce a o omanitrackeh.1P, RanWr«nama: wnwucnm ors. sou muN:nNall a stabilized _ ••• / arawwr.wm nawrmn ]w Now ro I,etall: wanmrw«. eN...: C A--- 3. Gmwp Its Mmwmasnwel cr aar.M1mwing 2 seu hsmvkn Mrm a cow wnn «coon cpnbd =.I,aaI:mdlaMl,. 1 riaNllze tM Ippr cMmw Punt aeeN erp mew nut mline tlwcMnnN wphd c n«ab»la ea«man ]Orb•. A Im- y EmuINeaYle from Omnv m an outlet aadxW watn . _ NrMre ie Maroeon at me MlN. S. Thee ales Nan Mrm aM1NI rwnem rn pb» uMlane dlelurbed Hasa en camdeaeN N,Matl •Sea peP i9lnr Nnpe ekuuron+. & StabElts Exposed Sell Part- - III, ant mulcnln{, amryma em.%on cmtml 11e, he .1. mNMNm naMlae expMM mp. Muknn end mooing wdeca rM adl wrc.M wnia ea.+n aN.ManmL RpWremma F4 maMnw mantweeMin r�nalpaolMweurnoriz�uvf Inrtlnl Ma•Jmo. any0aturbpnw in Mooroe muN be smMkoO srMma a.mn aorx a.v. The MaaM.... aypy • th it »rMwmx-e m mnww n rM ar» vnM1 n rM nM 20 M1oun one M«e'a nc n u.-rbn mre<aN rwr�ne Mn z, wn •seMMenMwm<ep.n m.we a«vwM1n dlw wnn a Mdh w peafe-r�N Ltrrcuea rounWPon mcebMn IrtilnyannW.en. Ax e:»a a alNaroen,. mya Xe.. wrmarm ediaNron wnnin ae Hors a ramnmghnal arose ISM page 331. Hawto-W. eying rM eked »Hans MfM Ndm noel sedan » oa+alel. mar m,wrwMrr a maMx%.J. rna �lawameaaare>am wul�mawe M tda�i alN�neJ Ion Fer s»OiM arN moicning rats, m,dv lne spxdutbm,mcar vow 9. Sudiaing ExpMea San'. TM I.mn Riak Site Handbook rof Iu- Prweodon anti aedlmam 2-hul 8 X a u bwmwedr daenarges tom sonrtrucdon euAp� Gnum Ge ermrt 39020 Wk»an me potmzal Mx taro s, inn Me conurlon aciMly wa ndgaees the applMnYamrivnym ow Pak Me Rnk ortMt wMcn rmulm an Inaxnpual n mrs I ant- »rva» the rpwrev GP39n20�wtec JntermmoraM Lww Pnx undo: cdneN IMormatlon V der ; why n^vaim >o s.n 3naet4 lingNwm �a41 1 vnw.wweaemuwiry.wynwnwret«nu. How m Inetml Hods Sae U da1 41rwn Nwa gbM1:9 n 1 2 d% engw. dOIM min mum for anAtn d ar veww n m) craaa a: P.<e nn« <lan Hoar ant d pw.l :ea Melmm�ance. d�no.man�W.en «an.o x.ap w l r xdl pnmrM ,l �irlM�!'d runt. Mow m calapy: n Ma mil rot ».am{ Mva:b{M.mp i m e FYI mma a+dl ma nmoNnaam IerBe roots araadiA aeeeeyAMrrernewe,»kreeelllr+ll+n sad. rs aw: n,-w "<, rn��N ,gym n'na le.rnm ee.».Mrr«wwrrMe»aew pW a4 9ed f5 Wy a s,.wr t wnewolfv W.«tcme,.l m.vP»:2w. ewnw e»Mlmow m.hY wr na,w.rud geew» 29 az. Dew.MrM$A.WM" Pumox: ]roN w«er pammd hom O+wnleMg «tNm»m mm n ie oMr Wren brvinBtM conePucnor. 4te. Peyuiremana: Wady ram Mwadrin{dnNWnn mN flcvm al a Inc xnatrv�cnm ua must M cNar. WNermv%rosy M Hawrommdr naeMx nMra m wa m.m nMr Haw m r nl JrseMrga non» or Wpm d:wMa¢e wear .NR pros arc„awns narelletl n vmedted «sas waYfmmwde,waa. P Table of Contents Section L In eotlut ron on «b sedlm«g wa... I vn,;n rs � .xi w, mevenn .N.r.IN Plea . . . . ..... 2 Mob»Um Rocen ... .....2 Sentbn 2 The Rsmunemenb 1. Marx S. HwnJarks...................... 3 2. Limn DiMurMrna Mm... .5 3. sreWLze Cprefructbn FaH......... . T 4. Inetall Gh fenro.. .. 1 t s. D- U. Purim ..................... I, 6. Slw Conn 0-.1,............... IB ]. Comrnacl Pa amarrmt................ 23 9. t Fl O aJe ....... ...... 33 11.0 NdyMktN ..... ...... 35 aw 1! mpect wr3!e. .. ..... ...... 3! Sadion 3: Anvilmnal Rmaamee r U.-1 Introductlon a- -asarmwWmentco ? h 0.- o the la Us Pusan s♦M •ewr»y mp Ph- wgeetrc, tna ncde - n:n¢Ide. �nodmn ,nl Mnfa men, M ewry.wwe nensmm0 mare rvam,A axes w wetlenda an rrm�n,pp�anlmsw mean,wnM a ro,w,e S. Slow Down Channelized Runoff P apoae Smm check Wm+rwu<. eraekn In aninage cnarnero q ekwPg down Ore %orVw«ar now. aI Rdlulrenlen6 O Ilan lei In a tlpM1 a• ne�la Mrma ry Mln wnwotM u»d Mlpn: No Bmedr Man 21mt Gnrer a tlem aMulU M U-rt:° nalml WMIh. Darraesrxr Inl pe m.aiai:Mn I III.chera.lp III. M Spour,F ,roc+me Enna m mu rM xatwn (awl a Me am tlem ro N Ne nlwetun cf the by Iar»U a cmluwuel torts sMalnpib MU � xeL•M1 cl.n«x em ll BWpe n <mm�N rNIUn » MamMawvca Rmxnw»cored aawnubre0 aM1 M Inc von 12 Inspect Your She Pu: INa arkwnenG;wcdn ma ermprv. mwcrwRPom N w•Wide«e e,a.e ♦ . 3i 0o I M.d a permm MY con%rvmlon acrlvM inN a WurM _ ornmemra a. 01 rge a«kmaent p,ow br uomwarer Olarn,r8m fnn comerwdim sHes.�rt Applkmkn PryM3a Me Permrc and aere:mrn me Rarr Gdgpy W ors pppowd yrgezt ine pamrzn .. auelrtyoyuan«sal.nm.. 2- m. aapry:n¢rw Ceperonwrt o�p,r i Imam b trnn ¢n•buctlo,. n NOf IO DECar M,r W<wys ba/o.eam Wan folwgin <ommr<Hm ro apwv sv{f<lerll lime Iw owlNng »bt a wrlrten euMwlrmdr hom CEG to ors coves un « m a mry Man mrn u<Mn. ur pmJ tt s tl 11rntl m M'uw'.a'ux', yes m. oepwartfm�nle� eln cv asozomrew vMl acuvnM d moM rmua:n8an Imivaue 4. Install Slit Fence »dU�mamwlnlo »RraoutM mnoY and afford swpe Oef Ragdrerawlb: apt Mn r m„N be Ina t me Dawn II 4 h u w.a<asnm .r moon nWww.m as It ana »,r..m l;°rlm maps me%dn ¢.n�i�rn mrrying na awn. �n rym�m amamn.K<yn eNw.an <Mpx soma a 9. Whits Stabilization P 11. . 1 l onecatnurvglonIa1Mmminimue«owon bwlM dwadm n • vaM.dm Napenge^in o w lan8n-snores even a.w« ea,ina M ad fall. wnn. one »,N adore m Its. 'Wlndr.vnerrMlun'ro vacuwW Mrs Me<nb» nd�Ap�li i. when n en0 eevment +dgndkanrN eMarMm ladra:l, tnemmrougM1ou mMa mare ana rNna <.n pmea<e: ®IMant noww mar tdecetl emun0 e'wN mreaNMme xoreitw m eroem RegWremann for Winer shutdown: proleNe rnN win canpdte aa-m O'NYmen» acMpM vxor mtM rinar p«ictl (CctoMr 131. me faldvin8 reoulmmema muu M aaMeJ m'. ath npw8edaon.ls wrcdu:e Nwp Isla Ne m�a.demM admwu porno sort r�a.r. 2. Hxetlugis raw mmpkre0 b/3epwnM lG aedndwlmnw.aa,„i»pmaNim maNMa,�.n Samoa 2 The Requirement, 1 Mark She Boundaries 1'urpase. M Nng ae ionnI'd maeww pq«we� Ve sna. Remarenmrc mr,m»tphp:elN ma limp of ocn%ruenm, ho t Mgwmb Wage Rase w[Mv .n rneewM Np WMm ev. fro � �sps<aewmfeN OcwnM m th eM ebbs • Erwna Vw zN'mc, cndm%mMnfrom baron ar%nage ana In'+� awe!, SOO set aNX • � eama+arM abp. no. yamf eawn a n fii^ rwfamcdit M .h. IXaF How m into l urc ro DDn Mo g • F,nur M e gd 8a Pw IaM odx epwnM MYpm Mm rwNeO.esm«n MMe r amlYxry up ao-mewe n pacts one mere Assism roPub mr•M «rarer pMotl rob inqudee we dEvae.n Conmv Mdvngw nett �¢ of n heavy ma�fw«. s»eN¢wm woody ry. a ro<amnnnpw mrea:ly8amwalmn awm8 wN Edits cmaamx _ m«\etl.amN mWnry2n<n» rent w 6Wi0G war. vcx:n w,we MrrmxeO In dae0 Punt mttn6:n Gann are»wrnerebin m m-h, Mannln8conurvcnon, rlx M. she n Xe8 new, pact sigaa. ar Inudi Grange +M.raWnr< can Ind an am MaMerywlV.m 50 re«da tldru M1u une»rM see "aa reaey dwebmtllex aun¢matla ,a nLa emu Melpnmanb IOr Wlmm Comimctlon �ueN domMr 15 or1nwNm{een Apr6113. rM on Moro 1db'NM aadnmenta mu+aM.dM1«ad la. 1 EnarW ea»ea volnb,N hh-ropmvne mramw swcxWl:ng. 2 LImM of dwumenM mead w nvlemtl ro rehca DaMeN snorer want. 3. A. mmeeement van mvvarea wnn e0muau emmp.na wmrd amNnaNer. rmw,m{.Iwrec ww«. »ww«�rc o�aro�w>,wa»font d, A minxnum 23 fom buRer snap M mdnulnae from p«meror mntmnwcn rslrc rose. s. m.r»amaimroerM MN dr«nme wM.reMv :�rn looa.t two rdn a Nn ales. mvN M auMe alml M.canmar. ,no« ant Ke eon.. n% Md nor eM rmw d :m>s. w.an..wi� a �rNa.damr.�.rx..apwwr wwawaw..blUb.!Im rwb..w,lfalgw rwluMwx dmw manes r� aPwaMrva. .-2. w,d �n ���� .wmalmewn�.a w•,d.awd.ma, 2. Unlit Disturbance Area i erwseam cnenmero Rosanamant5. area. Cnryme e 3ce xsre0 am lln au�nnr¢dam form may M mpvwtl N m 8nen ume. T. Construct Permanent Controls Purpose: P.rmmmr narmmmer Mermmt p,aN�ae ue ny, mwro c wPoa.rN«nowt, ant dw.maown.ne.m now na oI�P'oMe ana wN.enda mfimuan Mauna ant ad flMra Requlmmerm, M rMtvdl imoervbuv ar» in our eM, d wMln m• noon aewvb«n»t mIlMlprmon apply Id a seam vormwN« plan«w ��u�d� um<r mrmdmt+mrmwm«u..Mwm .. TM» prxtl»+muu N In«ellatl Md. rw:MN,amlan a am, ImMr.ba. wd.<_ MowmvomdY: Comav<Ms V«moot 9tormmaur Pmaam en0 mlb+r Ve mqunamerrta:n rM Krmont StdmmNer MemMSrormrwaaa Ma ww.Nwewewliry.oryawmmwl i+mneble el Per W uwM.mch w. .,r,dm m,anmra«a x:M Mrtn yau�aanM m,M M inaanae an,an m omen ,. MukM1 ued rot temporary+rndlaaalonnuu M NerM.atmdero nte. or a mrnmum of 31Mh» wMuce H09bx. cover. 9. Loanwncpwrg0laturMO mein etlwMa ofe men dam. arcee of Jxurbee emu mw M adbilaM n rots um. wnn m. Naowma Pun Pun r.wm.nme»m. n m .mn.a.n. wxn n 24 Mora. d,hN deeHbenon a mt mcemry. Pu db » nmo roandNmna or Doan mots o-ormMA 10. Prbr roruebplvtenhl-,MmuatM rem, de li. Ufa s!onem ateo0m areee onto mtM p«,rrx%« bingo uneer mn%mcnon pr wwa spew smn. M 10.20 fw Pule ry «xummudde oaP m cwndy: n ana« eM unn» ant <pmrrammn arnanM m m. p.mm�aa aareau a em1 p 1, uadae emMav so wkn seed .,vrdrd memM 0%da twalnnm8 wcrx In a new aed m a1Map. S. Divert Upland Ranalt Puapo¢r pw,rwn Mmw nomad rwodrmm elvc me m0 elrmin 1-Maau-area. n pmeNs camingm vow wnx Nsm-aruubn w. m ups ape er»a naNyew�m a«vtin robMnB N.oM awrle mu m LClwnivn e.nn b.rds e.w�dnle tuna dens M1.»m. wmpn «n..rm ..po N me Im<xxf ne ro.aN 2 Aane®eoMWve vamrbev area a20Md paD rtl�' Ir .... .... .._.„,nnnR Jwn,•rewnYn:uewpa,ai»ra+n�nnawr Mirew�p asWw+aw• um 10. StabIRu, Solt at Final Goods PumoSc zln¢ me Nre wnn cent end mulch or nros.on nln{Pun n«awe.. m. ,oar fleOalmmoth Wlanln d9 Mum r,IM1MI paling Me wpomM vm mm.,.r� mac me maklnea<a,wrae wnn ar.a�o:: tr f Contractor shall employas many ofthese best managementpractices to pre vent soil from leaving the construction site. Ifevidence is found oferoded soil leaving the construction site, the Engineer ma direct Site Contractor to implement additional best management practices at no additional cost to Owner. I IA II. ENGINEER kreba B La ti. S-, S.i n2l01 Ino. ten Main -a,M Suite 201 Cokhaemr, VT OeddB L T:(B021 e]8-MIS small®mebeandamirq.wm `.�P•�6H. DER * NO 5703 *_ 5y0 �a�r[ 24r� ;°u^nin, FOR PERMIT REVIEW O LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE i xxxxx xxxxx CONTENT CIVIL DETAILS DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT N0: xL-153W DATE. 09291] REVISED' SCALE As Noted CD-7 �rwerlP,n� PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS L_J 20 0 20 ,0 SCALE OF FEET WAGNER LARKI N TERRACE PHASE ONE ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVISIONS DRAWING NO. JOB NO, 638 SCALE I"=20._o" L 1.0 DATE 09.28.16 mh F-H W SIDEWALK E t L= 0 ITWDE-E-NG NG WILH LOW C. � 2 focrrly 1; F I C-M ce UW N CON- Dumpuffim :-4 IIAND u --NCR--CONCRETE SIDEWALK ' - ex -4- C. BIKE LOOPS P�RKING _C. 92, f'f 92.56 ff 5,122.61 "POO 4z' A, 4� MEL 111 77� :-zf2j.0. Fr 12 INE pity P3 , I - d V-�-, I I 1 1-1 1-/ r I I I i 1 111 1 i a. PI 1, -- + + PINE v INE PINE c, -------- ------------ ------------ 20 0 20 40 Z SCALE OF FEET ------------ A, WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE T802-4,0010 F802.3-6267 LARKIN TERRACE LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN REVISIONS ..... DRAWING NO. 10B NO. 638 SCALE 1. - 20" L 1 .0 DATE 10 1 3.16_ TREE PROTECTION NOTES \ \ I. p,nw<•e mmnoa..w ,<ktlw rar .ra:K a-..ne � pkv Prer•man YWlMrdv-tl MrpprevW ....... \ ' 1 Prepmtl rMwdr, m<arel. atl aYwdula W rear \ \( ^ �ea mrmu<I•n prmn., w,d vw faYll�on YW ab�im6 b.ppm•l k•r leowu.� Yn.e q Wr ArNrtwq •d mwktl wM M uR lm d aq d Ywa waw MM muk n M1v vw•M •[ scopn pr ve• Dwmnam Yl oanr vw an ew prepay MA be •arrtl \ ewam daWO P•r lvA rallPv dew m-. \ 1. -..5r d SI 000 MII M IeNtl apl-<ele C•nvac<v fur -W M<dad drann-u<tl•n IrwWv 8. Dragv m NrW m6 arlly vgeamr MI M � • \ enea<dn �tM MNUKt W 0.nr In •tmrArw wM \ MI 5•W<ydMbwrahun pSp a -�� <mrar•+a m ew r.plk.nru rea•IrArd Yw- fa.a. \ � � \ .pwwn d aww Yrf ARr A•<peien eae'ny<t d tlw -�"-� mm.paam.wfad wa b••�davad'mdp. �,. '4 '�� ]. �wrp mr v MMr dtlywvd m b• svtl ve dwspd .N✓ \ .. ---� r•plavmM< . ^W r•4 a rambr utl dmmr d n."., \ \ \ _ ve- v aNa.A d tlw am• rWew and Mary, u / - \ y.�npi .-` V VWa6 by ew Ow+w uM Artnlu<6 WII ke funidwd M <eW<emen<<nmv M<Wa WW Wd Ne Elmwv � 'sy �• �xal..•�^� I l� -_. � � -�� Yw cen•.ara.k<anpMry wlm Iwmmm. y-ngn. \ `� �� �\ / o-r ARnx.<c vaWmcwtlrymwr+el.a ?` '` a Tlw �ar..v.nYmwaltl mYw ra Wrtrm m rrdn w IrXY .eee.nd. TnveRXS W ex. ������ <omvuman openaaw mme be Aafanwb m -W . � nvmer ..nM mA p-r- eir omund mm,Y � - � emrem-Iwwwetl .— \. 10. Orly mwk YI <nMry Mu n We etltl atl •«anipnp ! ` N<M1Nwd m . Idn mir d <wrq Imo baA•r• dariin opar•Yau M1m <anmwnud limk •I dMry b � I"-' Mw+ry dWM wrka Nm<dBtlp .\: I1. c l-nm,d <wn Iola rwWry. 4 rr nly. sok.. far ` 44 x. H" ook � iorrmd���nwla °°w'Y p®amnaww6 I - 12 f4a•r m m d d �uon w.vk aM <Irlq wd -, \ ;� Il. fmonn a 6• �tlwa< ew w p �q� I _ .........,w�" er ✓ r>o ; v „F,,.,- � „ , 18. NT•n< C prmamq Yrl b. >. d.rmm.6 ew ned q ew A Ia 5WN• Av pranlry Ivkre•ardiiq I � \ I 1 _ mva mryau�• w wmr M<ww+s /mr mtlwd wwa dbrbMrtl bgad ew OaYF[AmkN - --- 17.. T.ao•< pnnlry Y•A b rXNantl q m I 1 __� _ _ recam�mda<iwu ��' MYllmim wtl venN brNA I _ I —. __ la perm-erYp MaM ar eW m v.namtl di —I q Mwn .ne -•m Yw 6,nda-p. 1,y A-M1im¢ 0.rfarm nvtlm O1115. -MVFa rL -.:. �mM- ne<wd v rpurtl q�landrvq ArAlmq peril pmrXNm deN<- faelmx nrtlltl ewlry <enr. d ew waw rnYl e. r.ne.tl eny afrWwark nllkk mry lnMva.m.p vro vW pl•m I ex 14" n i — 12'12- I I cb 11 7-11 -- �l I , I ex^i4=- i' I f t' I A I 3V n J PINE PI I I { I I INE IN. I PI I I I 2 0Q I \ I EX TREES TO BE REMOVED FOR DRAIN PIPE ACCESS TO STORMWATER POND u — II 'hie I I / i�y ./ I r. ex. - onhR _ 10 B ex. B Nq eelcc. trons r /11 n �.... / uH x. � — n e/ec cult ex./�. pe, v I ex. ceeox ex. 6"m pl, I li 1 I l , I 4- BX. 12" m Fie ex Grua Ilk "1 1 �- — LCli, 6'Fi� rc 1 ex. Jr in�le I �I ff ,502 f3 � jg � 6' crab II 6 I ex 4" Bb a 4" cia I / 507.56 — �I x2" ff 502.61 ff 43B 6 Y ff 5026f i 17"I m p/d 4 crab 7 bo ' - eX woods 200 r_ PINE I, I I I S i io o zo ao SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE T803.864.0010 f90].1164,616) ww .wnnnerhodnaen.<em LARKIN TERRACE EXISTING TREE INVENTORY REVISIONS • w.. ••• ,a aaa DRAWING NO. IOB NO. 638 SCALE 1 w = 2a-o• L I •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ramnp aM Ve 1 pr nl d de, C« set. i.,Id,.V General ant S,ppImweery Conlon"". aPPIV to tit, Sector 1.2 SUMMARY A. Sect cn Includes: Mann. 2. Tres Nk., 7, Trce-waekg &.rites. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. eacWPl: The esn h need to r[plece or tls w d rVbd%earth In an .xmnnon. B. Balled and Burlappd Stod: Pbm dug with 11- nrtd mwh ural balk rth In kh thvmn ey gown, with a ball,,, not k e tits, dvteser and depth rwannerdd by ANSI Z6C I for type ant sae d plain r",m* wrapped ,wth tralap, bad. rigidly .ppo d. ant tk,ssn lewd .eA nMw earth the rrwt flan vkd to x the blew d tM ball .-ended by ANSI ZW.1. C. B.BW end Puted Stock Pb- dug .irh firm .anal M6 d earth m w h they are grown ant phaxd-tecier, Ina Bat tee i, rrm bee Ihan dames« .nd drph r rn, erdd by ANSI Z60.1 fa type md,n, d plerc reneged. D. Comlmr-Gravm Stack Heakhy, v4wo walM d Wan, groom In a comeinr. th a w.11«ndhhad root ,ye.m rwcnrg ,Wes d wn.imr and mlnmlnlrg a Ilan ball Morn rrwmd fro. carxawr. Condor .hall b dpd anwugh to hoW ban chap ad part root cress d,nj,I pprg aM be,Iced ....ndng w ANSI Z60A br Iyp ant Ira, of pia. mgnrd. E. Fh.h Grade Ebva"«r of fnkhM ,udxe d pImtkng .0. F. Pw"dda A eebsmrrn or rrlaure Intended Ion pwam'vg. hssr ing. npling. or mkgaing Is pest. PmtkW., W de Imemddet mkkidm, he bicid- Wrgk+e,. rp ,.d.. rd mO .Irides. Tfw A. ixluda luluanxw « Ire . imedd f« I. as . Wan r VgW elokrrt ar e,rtnnc Some s csse densly harbudw,eparaWy Iron prtkidas. G. Pes.: Uvug eyankn m Lite,ccu at occur A- they r vet dnnrd or III., u. da,ug. I. Ws.. a .rinds. « people. Feet, i dW, knru. mom. Z ub,, rm/ink (mails ant ,lop). rodem (gophra. mow. aM nicel.. .. wd phm Iwed,l, fu,gL beccesis, aM w,een TRUNK PROTECTION. REINFORCED RUBBER HOSE GUYING WIRE, 3 PER TREE WITH TURNBUCKLES MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. EACH TREE MUST BE PUNTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE RE)ERED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. SET TOP OF MAIN ORDER ROOTS FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1%2" HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. 4" HIGH TEMPORARY SOIL SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE. ROPE WIRE AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL8" MIN. IF PUNT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8" INTO PLANTING HOLE CUT ALL GIRDLING ROOTS. NOTES I. REMOVE ALL NON - BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL FROM PLANT PT. 2. REMOVE ALL PUNT MATERIAL TAGS FLAGGING, AND EXTRANEOUS LABELS, ETC. H Penang Area: At- w M plamed. I. Mnabg SaY: Ea,t,,g a, -site veil: inp«ed+d; or mndacmed soil [hat feebeen modified .0 ,ail amer4-1. end pthap NIUE-. w Wed- a sdl ntb w . best Iu plant grswnh. ). Pant: Plana: Plant MeteiA. Thine wne, d,, w Ingeneral, erlrrdrg Item. ,h Ie, rites. gn-,,f comp, --I Vann. bulb, corn0. tW+n,. « lerlesc- wgen,i- K. Rom F'rr Aho ok<d'trunk fbra' The tea et she boa d tM Went snun* NIw, w t1e an or me* broaem w fain, room: ft arm d o-ar.mon brwventhe ro« sysdm and "..ten ar I,ed. L Stern Glydilg Reo., Rags ,hu esdrda the sum (nunW) d neaa Mew [h. toll slaw. M. Sub,,da The surfue . davxbn d subwil renaibg J[er -x i,e is c ,,Is so. u she tops -I.. Is, EE « bxkfil bd«c pbnti g Ins Is pb'A 14 COORDINATION A. Ccnntinenm wkh Trrf sex (Lewin) Pen[ Hen. shnb,. ant «Her plants altw Finish Odin an amblbhed ad More plamirg turf mex unity, «i-Nin, Indlm,ed. I. When plenty nee, +hr bI. ant other phne, akw phn,ing t f arc, pr«rt teed arm; and pronely r",I daneg. reseed by plan"rg apw ti I.S PREINSTALLATON MEETNGS A. PeneWhtion Cudere,xe: Cceehet-4.resw a[ IN, -In. 1.6 ACTION SUBMITTALS A. P ,%,:I Dots For mch typ d pd,sct. I. Pam Matrisk: I«lode gwmitix, sbn, pulley. and tourw 1« Ohm rmurbk. 2. Pant Photographs: Indude w1« plexegnpi e in dig" I— d each nnfe d species and ,he d phm m,-A x a wet N, hmlaMd w "ect. Take 0,..paph, I— e, anph depktwg raw sae ant condition d de lypid Wax w be furnished Indde a set. rod «other mruirg devke In eech phe.graph. F« rpedn where more the, 10 pL.. ue requ d. i,xlud.. n nnrxm d inrm pl-.g,*hI Ihce" IRA amrage Warr. he Rat qudry phm. ,.d "re wnsl g,di,y phm w be ke,+khed Idere4y mch phowpaph with the full Icbrxlllc min d the Wam, phs. ,Ile ad Heine d the gr«M,% N-Isly. B. Ssenpw, f« VerHmIIV1Y For mch d the Ubwing: I. Orpnic Mulch I -pint Mums d mch «pnk Imrlch r"Wrd; In sdd plastic bag, l I d Mth canrpu111on d mrerial, by prwm.ge d Nsiot ant soon d nick ;FF11 TREE SET TO BE PLUMB 2' MULCH. DO NOT PUCE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB TRUNK. MAINTAIN MULCH WEED -FREE FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING. BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL IN SANDY LOAM SOIL MIX IN 20% COMPOSTED ORGANIC MATERIAL WITH EXISTING SOIL GENTLY PACK THE BACKFILL USING WATER TO SETTLE SOIL AND ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT. 1� SHRUB PLANTING L NTS Each Sa1p1. sites be typed d dr. bi of newel w e fwmhed; p ,n fs en xcau. ."Lenten- d color, -.1. end organc rrxheup. 2. Prupl..ryRwt-BakSuNkaatkn Den- One unk. 3. Sh+v.R,I, s . Tree-Wxeug DN, a One unit d each size. regnbed. 4. EdpW r-1m dI and Acmwriec Manuhanren"s wrdrd tor, w nrRy <d« tawcud. INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS C. Quasdicsnon Dan: F« bndcep. I..IW. nclue Let d I'Imlx Projew mrspk d by Immler drwuvatn,g Inecders mpabdiusa eM ..pr-. Inelre prq- s.nlu. .dl.wwc. arJ ymr mrrBau[d. vet nrduJa ruler ant addressr d ownri cwgxt pectins.. D. Product Crdfi-.,: Fu mch typ d mnd-ed pW- Inen mnd-r, rrd nxrplying wkh the folowig Mandactu ', nndkd Help" of -n,le d podut:s. 2. Anak+k d «he m is by Is r-,r..d bb-tic-, nee acc.,N g W nesshod, rublhhd by the Au tlors d Of eel A lyucel CMrisn../.re epplbNa. E Pwdcldr and Hebk es: Rodeo taW e d mawbctw,n's apol m mstructbm spdfk w P"-. F. Swnnk, Warran.y F« speIW warranty. 1.7 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS A Manrawxa Dau: Rm,xmreded paedwas w be mmbkshed by Pww f« rrernevnw d phnn durig. mlermr per. Swank Mon axWrationdrequad mintemrce perbd,. 1.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE A Im.11e, O.uBhtka: A qsu Mind W,ds ,e I csfi r ,Morse vwsrk ha, mnnkd In see 1d mmblkhm.nt d Wam,. I. E.p.rwrxe. F'ne yexi e.pew«e in brd,,e a imtefieti n. 2. ImWk+S FwW Ss snvh . RePYn ln.dkr w m im.I an exprirxed fU-din ,u ,evhnr m Prr4rn ske when work n in pn ree,. 3. Perak Applk e- Sue Ibese.q c .... rd. S. Prowde pnlq. se.. g.ra. spedr, ad mriery f plenn kldcrad c"nq *,h appBmb. ngdrem.n. In ANSI 7A0.1. C. Mexrewrn: Mexue a«ard,g w ANSI Z60.1. Do not Our. w abdn r.quked nave. I. Tress. and ShrLie: M,aee wkh br-I m and nod. or mne, b their nornul PwtI_. Teske height rnms.rmrww from or nmr the Iop d the root fee. for field-groavn twrk ant mmMer.grown stud,. Mexum main body d bee « lrub for laigm ant ,pmd: (3) PRUNE TO REMOVE DEAD AND DAMAGED STEMS. MAINTAIN NATURAL SHAPE OF PLANT. DO NOT SHEAR PUNT SET TOP OF MAIN ORDER ROOTS FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1%2" HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. 4" HIGH TEMPORARY SOIL SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL REMOVE ALL TWINE ROPE WIRE AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL 8' MIN. IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL CUi THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8' INTO PLANTING HOLE. CUT ALL GIRDLING ROOTS. NOTES: I. REMOVE ALL NON - BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL FROM PLANT PIT. 2. REMOVE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TAGS. FLAGGING, AND EXTRANEOUS LABELS, ETC. SPACING'D' ROW'A• NUMBER OF PLANTSISOXT. 60' O.G. 51.96' 0.04 48' 0.0 41.52" 0.07 42' O.C. 36.52' 0.10 36'0.C. 31.20' 0.12 30' O.C. 26.00' 0.18 24' O.C. 20.76" 028 QUANTITY OF SHRUBS AND SPACING AS NOTED IN PLANTING SCHEDULE \ SHRUB SPACING J NTS do not -suro brardnss « moo up W Ip. Take cAper mexr.nema b txhw above [he root Rena I- new up W 4,In mlrpr tee, ant 12 iud,e, above tM r- 0are far larger sieve. 2. Othm Plan.: Mmaure wsh,n-, pe 1m, lad fnli,r In ,hek rwmel pmitbn. D Pan, MetriN Ob,-,.,: A cktea may observe plan -.1 ehhr It peca d grovth « !,e Mon III- g for c«rpkaxe with repdremenn f« gene. ,pecess ornery, cnit r bataid q.W.y. Archtr, may also oberw tree, aM shll N.Itr br use end rondium d h and root ,ys, n pen dsm,e ,ynpl wlurkm. and Ixem ddem sM ney I.Ped wide¢«, or efrtiv. retrial . any nine during p,,r d wvak. Remove repcted t « h LA. m-d,.* fmm Project sits Nmily Architect d ,ourcm d planting netrh1h ,eve, dap in advam d delivery w 9 DELIVERY, STORAGE. AND HANDLING A Nd,.pd Mx d. D.Iwr -k;lad materuk In orWnss, uncs-ed m.- showing wedrL wnade l amlysk, and add.,s d ma,dacwrr. ant esdmllon m compliance with +mu ant Fdeml law. d •pebble. B. Beek Mawiak: I. Da rain dump ar Is- bulk m,riak rear avrxturm, uUltin, wakwap and pain-... on -Mg turf... or phm. 2. proved. erwlorheomrpl mxum co peen -1,In « dimple -re, d buk nenerkk; dkchujl, d sal-bmring weer r,mg. vet wborn. dot reading Assent propene,, water com pence ,y„lain.or walkway,. 3. P<om,pen y axh deh..y d bulk neunsk ,wait appapere crvfi,xw. C. Do not prene Irws ant +Hub, before ddwery. Protect bark brain-., and root sy w from ea, ,reed d-Tksg MM bin, sweensg wIepWrg, ant rhr hardin and ty:g dener, D. m, bend or bndtiss « h b, I.,.& a a w destroy their nez-1 shape. Provide pre-N. cwerirg d plan. drug ,hipping and ddwery- Da re., d'op Welds. fining deMery and handing. O. Handle plant g Buck by r WII. E. Apply e, idmiccans w "lain vet atrubs m,M pmr ,pay w pwide art ad.,Mats, Urn weer crud, (bakee wrappirgJ, bmndl Imes. I.* IM Wolfe I. pawl drug dWrg hvding ant sm+ponation. I. If d.aeoua raw « If— r. noted in full led. spay with aMdes,o a rwn.q I,ef«e moving and again tote weeks ahe Wamirng. F. wrap I— aM shrub, with burlap hbrk omr trunk, bra«hat, ,arm. IMp. and (d sr w pram.[ frnn MM ud nth« daring. during dggllg. handll. , rd rmmplatxlon. G. Deily« plains J,or p,"re no. fo, planting ham born c«npkeed ant m J Inxwdlrely. It plaMrrg I, delayd more than In, hour after &INery, ,et Hams ad new In thdr app,o"te (4) sepa (tut fllurd s or snael. pr«.a I— vmaUr and-I,e-el damage. and keep I. Sr balled s,-k ran 9-M and rover hall .111 -1. P.o, m.s, aaw,ke, « nrMr .-pubs. mcrid. 2. Do rd remove mnminr-grown ,rodt from ct - bet«. brn d IArKne 3. 111 ,p, system d Penn, It«d orr-,Ae deeply ant tit«ougfly a a I—— spray. Waur u ohan Is nece eery w Neimin root If,- In a mdst bK n« overly wet'o ition 1.10 FIELD CONDITIONS A. Fbld M.,urcmams: Vrdy .,aml grant ek n... wM ant ndllly In.d. s. Irrip[Inn ,pre. conspn+em and dmem d pleres-V aM corn nxtbn ca"Ig,um wish new plunlnp try A W mmsur.mex+ b.lar. p-.4% wkh Wands work. B. PWung R."rkelun. Pax during a. a the kifb g pr ,. Co«dnou pbmeg print, -0 rrvxe - prod . p-" rxgrxd mm[manc. Iran des. d Subswml C.Noa n I. Spring Ph-.,; Ahr ground hu thawed 1. I.Iy 31 . 2. Fall Planting: September 1^ uMl ground hu Ism- « -,her c«dtion mke enprrniml. C. Wexher LImairns: P-sel Mth pbntirg .trey when od,u,q and faremsted weathr wd.on, Prmn pb,m,g w I e wcened .hen twnM,ul ant opt m rwuk, my be obaind. Apply pW- Berg Iaworade weather wMidon -,frog w --banner, entten ne-ctmn, aM a snay repkre.ern. I.II WARRANTY A. Special Warraruy Imdler epee, to nplr « mphce Wv,tlrjp and a«m,«ies thr tale m mtedak, workrvnsHp «growth wahn sprBd wemnty period. I. Failures mclude, but are n,,I Inked w IRA folbwing I. D.rh sM umakhctory growth, except f« detects rmulug Imm .bun. leek a1 adegmee r esenns exe, u neglect by Owrnr. h Strumral fsdrre, -Wing Wanup big « bka.Mng over. c. Fatly P.r4. d tree stabikmdm and e*,m d. De[edomdon d minds, meal Irsial- ant .1- nweriala try w rormal wmd.rirg. 2. W.,..y Perbdt From Fite of plsmq cnnplW- Trva. Shmte. VYsa, ant O-, eeal Grx,w: 12 month,. b. G-.d Cows. B-n d,, P.nmuh, and Other Pam: 12 month. SPACING CENTER ROW IUAL NON ING WAGNER LARKIN TERRACE PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVISIONS DRAWING NO. JOB No. 638 SCALE N/A L1.2 DATE 10.06.16 I . Include the following morw al anion, A, a n/nimum A . immediately r ,nova dead PI-1 And r phre unlet requited to plane I, the atceekg g'"A ng I-." "e Is.Replan pbms that re more In.. 25 percent dead or in An unhealthy condition at and of --may, period. c. A Ira d one replacement Al each parr k required except for loses or .eplawm.as due wfalmo to Imply with mquammem. d. Pounds esrtendd vornnry for p-d! Nael to original -my period for replaced pant _Wr'.1 e PART 2-PRODUCTS 2.1 PLANT MATERIAL A. Geneat Furnish ruse y gmwn plants tree to genur. specn, aariany. wluwr, stem form. ,hearing, and other (slum muliateel in Paw Us,, Mara Schedule. or Plan Legend ilmosed on Drawings and omrplying wit, ANSI Z60.1: and wi% healthy root syumm; developed by tnmplamne or row pruning. Provide wel.ahapsd fully bazWwwd. healthy, vigoroaa ateck densely foliated when n leaf and low of disease peen, eggs. arvaa and deleas such os knot, aura sold, injuries, Abnsiom, and dafg-roo.:t. I. Trees with damaged crooked, or multiple nde,: tight vordwl branches where bark Is s%-ed h- two bands. o between branch and trunk (icnrkd bark"): =sung trunk,: -A great local than 314 1- in diameter; or with stem gardlmg roan arc avaepxabe. 2. Cdleaad Stock Do rest use plant h.-.d fre. the wind, from native sale, from an antabhhM andwape panting, or roc grown in A nursery -1 otherwise Indicated B. Powde plant: of. grades, and ball or cvmainr Aker comwith h ANSI Z60.1 f,r types and lam o/ plants required Pants ofa hrger she may be used if acceptable to ArINWIA, with A proporiomh increase in sine of noon a bags. C. Root -Ball Depak Furnish Ime, and shrub wid roor bell -..red from top of root ball which begins a root Rare according to ANSI Z60.1. Root Ban ,hall As vembla before Aiming. D. Labaesg Label at leastnt pins ofeach vniety, sea and anpor with A securely aadwd. waterprool erg bearing I aNo d nignamos of common name and full scmentlf, home, mcludmg go -and spcns. Iclude -,so-- I., hybrd, wrim, a orinvar, R Applicable for she plant. E. If formal -art.-- a -Won iw order of plants 1, irdnimed on Drndng, select stock for onfiom saght and spread, and numbor the label to azure.ymmwtryin pisdng. Im B. Roots: Remo. spin finsi g roots and kinked roes. R--npral root by -lag deadly; do not beak. .. C. Ballad and Burbppd Stock Set each pill plunge and In weer d phmiMI pit w trench with root Bare acf-t faah gradm or 1"-2" Ingle, in slowly dronong mill I. Backfil1: Planting rod. For oeos..e -.,.W ml for bxkllll, 2. After pacing same hackfill annul woo Will w sabilke plan, carefully cut and remove burlap, rope, and win hookers fmm wpm of mart bald and from sides. be do our ve from ceroo der t bail. move Repalm, 9 any, bef.n mabg. Do not use planning stock I root boil is necked or broken Mae or during Planting operation. I. Baddll around root be In layer, caopire w .We poi al efmihop void and air pockets. When planting pit 4 approdmuely ant -half filled water thoroughly Mae placing remdnder ofbaddill. Repot wmennig until no more water 1, Absorbed. 4. M.. Planting radon equally dovibuted .rand each panting pk when pit I, Approxmr my .ne-hall (NW Pace cable. beside [he root ball about I inch from coo, di.; do not place cable. In bottom of the law. a. Quality. Al indaced by marhaurer for each pant ran And type. S. Conelraw bxWling;A oom. Want again ales pa<ingand lampng find year d,.I. D. Ba1d and PotW al Comaimr-Grown Sod; Set each plan plumb And in Winter of Planting pit or vouch with root Bare Adjawnt Ranh grades or I"-2" over, in sbwly drams, sals. I. BacMdL Prating sod. For item, onemuavatd soil for b ckfll, 2. Careful re mot hall Iran containe, without clmragng coo[ ball a flare. 3. Backfill around root All he layers, amp r, to serd. me and ellmieate Mel and air pocke a, When plandr, ph h .ppr.dmatt), one-ha11 Ofed, wand, thoroughly Moe placing remainder f b.140 Repeat swearing nmtl no aura water k .16-b d. 4. Pace Planting abet eq.Wly dhadWtd azoud each planting pk when pit I. am limmdy uw-half Ord. Pace abns fluid, the mud bail about I inch from rent rim; do eat pace tables In be.- of the hen. A . Quantity: As Indmepd by manufacture for each plant sae and type. S. Cowohw bzckfniing procal. Water agar after placing nd-,M n,al layer d sal E. Slopec: Winn planting on slop.. set the plan so the now Ware on des uphill side k Rush wish rob m,-u-Anil sal on the nape: the edge of the root bell on the downhill sides will be above the a.-,dn a soil. Apply enough coil to corer the downhill side of she row boll 316 MECHANIZED TREE- PADE PANTING A Trees may be putted wish An approval oredumizal nee spi At der d.ignae locakns. Do not A. nee spade to move veea i than IN, mmrimen ere .11c oad for A similar field. grown, laRoedandbuvapped row -MI diameter accri to sANSI Z60.I, or larger than -.I.t..,*I maximum sae racamerlauon for the nee spade bang Wed whiehmer s snaller 2.2 FERTILIZERS A. Ranting Tablet: Tightly compressed dp-type, brg-lasting flow -release, cwnnerciakgrade p6ming nruber in label form Tabora shall break down with soil bacteria com sting nut- Into a form but on be aborted by plant rows, I. Size arc Qwlq- As indkatd by m rof-eer for eah plant type. 2. Narem Compositor: 20 per,Am ngrogan, 10 percent phosplerou, and 5 percent p Werra en, by weight plus micronuoiaans. 2.3 MULCHES A. Orgnk Mukh: Frye from didialiow material, and suiable a A top dr..mg of veers and shrub. cmrnting of taw d the lollown,: I. Type: Shredded hardwood adlor ground or,hreddd berk I She Range 3 Inches rtexmum. 12 ich mm- 3. Co-: Natural. 2.4 PESTICIDES A. Genent P.tkide rogmarnl and apw-.d by des EPA ampable to aaa-,. having jendkirm, AM of type recommended by rrmuhcmrrr for each specific problem al As squired for Project conditions and appli-- Do not .e restrmwd pose ids. onians authaaed In wrung by a dhorkka haArg prsdktbn. B. Pe-Emeget Herbcide (Selective and Nandectiaey, ERecan. I- co gosling the go-.., or gnwdlu W wells, wars, Filmed azeu at the soil lesl dlreNy ask. the mach layer. C. Post-Enwmged Herbicide (Selcahe all N.-Iustive): ERecsiw for mnaroWmg weed growdn that has already garmh arcd. 2.5 TREE -STABILIZATION MATERIALS A. Trunk-Stabilusoll, Morena, I. =I, Tines: Wide rubber or dame bands or soaps of length regwre i to reach sake turnbuckles. I Guy, and Tlo Wres. ASTM A64IIA 641 M. CW, I, gahanrzdatwl wire twosvad. twisted. 0.106 ich indiameter. 3. tine -maw Guy Cables ndoth demo Fhb,Ira, 3/16-lb.M . gaignb-ateel ahh cable w turnbuckle, a minimum of 3 inch. long with two 316-inc, g hum ized eyebolt. 4. Flags: Standard I-wyor, plastic f aging Al whip, 6 inches lag. S. PoKka,,u Stakingand-Goymg Dwich: Proprietary sake or And- and adi.sabk: tie arino ro secure each new panting by plant stem; -rdi le indicated and co -I ng in nvnufaaurfar's writer, term --daunts. (7) B. When esdracung the tree, eentc tbe -k within the tine apda and nave tree with s sold ball d earth. C. Cu olgAmad roou deny during tan,paming opratbm. D Pant trees folbwirg procedures In "Toe. Shrub and Vim, Plarthe Article E. Where "Alba, oda nt the van in the same directim As In Its original loot:... 3.7 TREE SHRUB. AND VINE PRUNING A. Remove only dead dyirg, or broken banthol. Do raw prurc for shape. B. Pure, thin. And shape ve., ,hhbt. and Vme err directed by Arch- C. R.- thin and sh," ales. A-W, and vinhl According to vondvd praMaiwd horticultural ad aburkt/tural practices. Unless odmawse indatsd by Archlpa, do not rat tree leaden; ,y inpmd, dying. or dead branches from trees ad ahrub; al w proto reran natraral changer. D. Do or, apply prunirg ham to wot.da. 3.8 TREE STABIUZATION A. By Staling and Guying: Irooll hunk stabilization As follows uM.s wherwise Indatd on Drawing,. Stake and guy veer more than 14 feet in height and more than 3 Inch. In rahWn- wers mherwiv ilio td. I. Si,.Fabrk-d, Staking-and-GwIry Medacd reap rm fewer than thea guys speed equally around tree. a. Swaney -0 pup to stakes 30 inches brag, driven to grin. Mi., spacing to avid ponamsmg rcaor balk or row nasces. PrawidW wrebuckle for muds guy wan and righter securely. A,Su;:,, [reef v4th lamb of fl-ble tles At la ua poism with one trook and nothing to ,urnbucNe. Avow enough slack to awsid igm r.traint of tree, c Mach Oags to each guy wire 30 inches above Finish grade. I Proprmmary Sakog AM Guying Deuces Imal sAskog ere guying Item aid and p.amned As r-..-.Id by ran ulacorer I otherwise nhaicatd al According as nandaamreri wines I.cru -. 3.9 GROUND COVER AND RANT PLANTING A. Set out and space ground lover and plants other thin vees, shrubs. and views As indicated on Drawn, non .n rmw will, cm., lar sparing. B. Use pbmimg soil for backsl, (12) I. Products: Subjat w compliance with requirement, available products that may be incorporated into the Work include, but are nor linked to, the flowing: I) Arburbrxe: ArbaBrace Tree Guying System. 2) Ball Big Products. Inc; Tree Anchor Kit. 3) DeepRoot Green Idrasnularm. LLC: ArborTW AT LDI00 Prdessimal Anchoring Kit. Ae-Te. ATHD 15 Huvy Duty Anchoring Kit 4) F-,ght Pf.d-, LLC; D.kbal P,.W s,-W Tree Guy Sppm 5) J. R. Paamrs; Grate Staka. Malta Grate Stake, Mager Sake. R2 Stake. 6) Vila Root Barnes; Word. Tree Guy, Worker Tree T. B. Root -Ball Stablkaion Matahls: I. Upright Sake, al H-1foreal HoldDown: Rough-nwm, soul new hardwood or softwood, free of knots, holes, crow gran, and other ddecv, 2by-24nch normal by legth mch add, stake pained At one aM I Wod Scum: ASMEBI8,6.1. 3. Proprietary Roa-Ball Sabibauoo Gondola: Propnm y At- or below -grade sadliadon system, to acute each new plarmsg by root All AM that do not acirde the vnnk; sued ac-rdir, to manufaa... e, written rcommerdaziom orl- otherwise indicated. A. Produm; Subject tarem to complete with regana. )provide the following] (Provitk one of the tdlowingj janifabse prssdtt chat trey be incorporated into the Work include but are raw Baited W. the tolkmimgj: I I Border Cen opts, Inc. Tomahawk Tree Stabitaers, 2) For.igw Products, LLC; Duckbill football Fbag System 3) Tree Staple. lac; Trae Scanlan. 2.6 TREE -WATERING DEVICES A. Slaw-Releue Wacering DeAm Standard produxt wofaccaed for dip irrigation of plant and emptying ns water content over an sanded time period rm ndacturd from UV411H- sladlad irybn•siNace l polyethylene shay. PVC, or HOPE piattic 1. Rod- Subjct w cumplianw whh notanomen- available proucc, that may be hemp-isd into IN Wait Indulges be arm not limxed to she fodkmh 11 A. BIO-PLEX. A. Erg,-d Watering Solutions; PQ Partner, U.C. I. Spectrum Products, Inc I Color. Aa seleaed by Architect from srandacturer i fad range. ;a C. Dig Will, large erough be allow, treading of moos. D. Work end around room to eliminate air pilot, and leave A alight ewer ind-union around plans co hold water. E Water thoroughly aftr planting, taking are not to cover plant crowns with was soil. F. Protect plans from hot pit and will: remove pro-lon K plams shun evil- of recovery lean tranplau g shock 3.10 PLANTING AREA MULCHING A. Mulch badddded surfaw, of photo, area and other area iliated I. Tres. and TrWdmka Sbtds m Turf Areas: Apply organic mulch dng W 2-inch average thkiuws,, wish 364id, mall. around vunks a tents. Do eat piece mulch within 3 Ickes of trunks or morns. 2. Organic Mulch In Planting Area: Apply 24nch average thkknes W organic mulch over wlnle wriace d pbwmrg area, and fish 1" with alf-un finial,grades. 111 INSTALLING SLOW -RELEASE WATERING DEVICE A. Provide ore dads for a.ch tree. B. Pace Janke oo top It the mould+ a ben of trots stare and fig with water co-ifing re mar dactureui -I- instruction, 3.12 PANT MAINTENANCE A. Mountain pfantnt, by pnnang, wltnau� oclu tg weeing ferduri Mohan,-Wourg planting s. ad{.urg and npavi g a-abdmtion dovic.. maesar, to proper grace, wmal prettion, and performing otho opeacos As mq ird to ellablkh hulthy. Mable panmg, 8. Fill in, or re-ar,. soil mb,idans has n" ooe two.e of melding or other p-WA. Repbce moon -Wriah damaged or last o teas of ,rA lams. C. Apply unarms,. As required to keep pia maerhb. proud asu, and soil bee of pints and pathogens or disease. Use Integrated post nmag-. praaicu when possible to nommere we W puticdos and sWdrce mrada. Treatments inducer ph nal l controls such As hang off fuR,ga mechanical cu tr.k such us crape. al biologic cwhtrol aga nts. 3.13 PESTICIDE APPUCATION A. Apply peebades and odor chemical products and Imo gmal control agars -r-ding to anthombe, hav'mg jrisdictln. and maMam,a's wrrcten retominanducorn. Coordnxa mm 2.7 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS A Anideric- W-r-insoluble annuli permeable moisture retarder, Pm laming, for trees and ahruba. DWlver I. original, ", and fully labeled containers and mi. Accordkg ro m -faaurer i writhe -a -rot. B. Burlap: Nahaynthear, bodgradable. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Exardno area W receive pants. with Imullor present, for conyliace with -quamo ems and [.Minors 0-1.g ins .11.6c n A-1 performance of the Work. I. V.ify flat no foreign a d I-Ir. material . liquid soh as pant, Our -b- .ere slurry, aancete lawn a chunk., cemar, plater. od , gu.h.a. diesel fud. Pamir thinner, turpemi a. tar, roofing compound, or aced has beer deposited in sod widkn a p omag area. 2. Vorly Rut plants and vehkna lwdud with plains on travel to planting locatiow with adagtat overhead cleanrce. 3. Su,pend Planting operations dung periods of awcusrro sod moisna-a ..a the manure coment eachm u Wpt.bI, level, not aoln aw required result. 4. Umorrrdy moisten excassivey dry oil the Is not worked, or which o d.ty. & If cwraminakan by soregn or deleano , m reiial or liquid i, primal in ,oil within a planting pAll j.rin�w the -1 and cwttammuon As ct direed by Architect and replace with new "L C. Pmwed with mttalial Orly other -Adslar ory c.nd - have been -local. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Prot udise, odewaiks, pavement and other facilities and and area. ard esbdng plats bons damage a.d by panting ops ratbs. a. lnsag ro b-c-d -Ana to prevent erosion or displzcament d sea and discharge of soil -bearing wapn runoff or airborne dust w adjacent properties and wakways. C. nay ow indvidual a- and shrub I-- al a,- for mrdWI ahm angs. Stake loodae, omdne areas, adMt kxslms when requested, AM obtain A,c1,Wa's acceptance of by - before -oil a pbhIr g Make mlror ealf-mans, as requited. D. lay test plan, At b-ions ductal by Arlin- rake lorim- or ndvidual veer and shrub and .adhw rota for multiple pannrgl. 10 ,pplk,non, with Ownel, operation and when in prodmiry to the Work. Notify Oamer belos each applwaon nos perbnmd. B. Pe -Emergent Harbidd.s (Sdecwe and NonnleWw); Apply . veer. shrub. arc grourd- ear According to manuhaa er, woven retonmwndumons. Do not apply p seeded C. Post -Emergent Herbicides (Selective and Nanelissim): Apply only As necessary to treat already-g rmmmted weed, AM according w rmmda miner, written, ramnmendxlws. 3.14 REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT k Gomorrah Repair or replam aeroding or now rem and other plant, tent are dimagd by -auction War-,. In A cranes, approval by Artful - I. Submit dead of proposed pruning and repair. 2. Perform repan of damaged vunm, branohan, and roots wishin 24111- 1 approved. 3. Rephl. teea and othr plants that cannot be repaired and --d to Iu11-growth status As, determined by Architea. & Remove ad replace trees that are more ,lean 25 per ... I dead or in An unhealthy condtion More the end W the corractbn, paHod or Area damaged riming co n[rvcdm operations that Architect determines .. incapable of r.tonrg An .-I growth pattern. I. Podde new tree of Aame sae as those being replace. 2. Species of Replacement Treat Special ,dead by Architect. 3.15 CLEANING AND PROTECTION A. Bring planing, loop aQa lnt paving and co a nuction clean and work area in an orderly collision. Clean wheels of wNces, before laving site w -id cracking sal onto road, web. or other paved area. B. R.-. surplus soil And wasp matriil inddhg exceu sebd4 unaabe soil, a.h and debris and legally dopwa of them elf Owr AI property. C. Potc, pant 1-damage doe w landsape operation and operations d other muuaaws ad mad.. Malmam protecrbe, durb, er-lbtion and mcdon moo porirda To-, repair, or splacedamagd p1mamgs D. After installation and before Substaxial Complain— remove ,urery tags, nurery, ink., he tap, label, wfra. bvap and whl, damn (resit pant -Wr A parting area, AM Probe site. E. Al nos W S.Wc men Compham, v.mfy that vowatanmg dank. Ara- god world, order And leave them in plant. Replant Improperly funxtlonnq devkm. M 3.3 PLANTING AREA ESTABLISHMENT A. Placing Pl,mvg Sol). Mace mandaaured planting sod over exposed udgrade. S. Before planu,g obtain Archit,&, acooptvua of finish grading; restore planting areas if eroded or otherwise dotebel after fri sh grading. 3A EXCAVATION FOR TREES AND SHRUBS A. Planting Pt and Trechus: Eaevate circular planing pits. 1. Exavau s Planting pill with sdw sloping inward a A 45-degree a,le. Exavatbns wish venial sides are em aeprmle. Trans perimeter d Mtran having cmror,, of ba..In sled slightly w support r.ot bail and .,i., �n drainage away from eamer. O. of hrher disturb base. Enture that root ball will sit on undisturbed base sod W prevent seal.,. Scarify sides of pining pit i nwral or shad during -cation. 2. E.- apF ..mosey three times as wide le MI diameter for ba11M ale burlappea. bailed and potted, and ocaman -grown strck. 3. Do not exnvan doope, than catch d ,he row bad, meacmd from the root (fare to the bottom of the root ball. 4. If area under tle plant was in Italy dug too deep, add soil to ink. it to the wrrrtn 1-1 a,d,hewghly tamp the Added awl to prevwt wading. S. Malnans ngyan I repose of dpacen matered, to snore anb lity. Do not e>aavats mbgradi of adjacent paving, structures. harcham , or Cher now, a esmdg mpnovements. 6. Marnuin ppervision d axavdms duritg wprknug hour. 7. Keep excavatkm covered or ohe-,. pmmmod will un-.dd by maalhr's Penoned. B. it drain of, k v,dkaM an Dnwir,, or re,ium d under phraing areas, ewers to top of porou, backfil oaer ern, B, BxWill Soil: Snd to ubwil apsoil staved Iron elevation, •tray be ared a, WckfR1 soil unless otherwise In&otM. C. Obttnsaion,: Notify Ardutea of i nmspacted rack or obvucmo, detrimental to uses or shrub are ecoumeradin exa,mons. D. Draliwge: Nu[Ky Arcbrect it s,W,l condition, evidence unexpected water seepge or rerenuon in tree or III phmirg pit,. E. Fill exawtkar with water and .lbw w percolate away before P,, kwhing tree, and shrub, 3.5 TREE, SHRUB, AND VINE PLANTING A. Irepealon: At tone of planting, verily that noise fare Is dslble at top of rote, ball aco nfi g to ANSI Z60.1. R root fare Is eat doble. remove ,oil in A onel manneor from the, roe all to ochre the tolinocat roAt emerges from are nook After sod removil to n,,W, the roe All. -1f, tint root WI ,till .sits she raquiramn.. (10) 3.16 MAINTENANCE SERVICE A. Milnepnre S-co for bees and Shrubs: Prood. maintenance by ale gad emp".. of hndsca" Inrtall., Maintain As required in "Plant Maintenance Auricle. Begin -ntar . immediately after pant are k staged And continue ur" panting, as anceptably healthy and well established. but for eat let than meimehoce period below. I. MamaeanWi Porkad 12 -.do from due of parting amplator. & Main mmool Samoa for Ground! Covar And Oahe Pant: Prmdr maneemunco by skillal enpl.yeas d Wd,ape leveler. Maintan Is requirwl 1,'Plan, Mamehoncw' Article "Is rce immwdately are, perm, All Instable! And contmw unoT pacm g, are ampably healthy and wall .tabi.hed, be for rat lea, than rwI.-- period babes I. Malm.unce Period 12 monde from date of taming wmpl.knh. END OF SECTION 329300 19 WAGNER LARKIN TERRACE PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVISIONS DRAWING NO. 108 NO. 638 SCALE N/A L I • 3 DATE 1.16 OPEN SPACE r — 1 PARKING LOT INDICATED WITH SHADING I I TOTAL AREA: 17,938 ft' 31,597 ft' (28.5% of 110,812 ft2 TOTAL AREA) L J \ PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE \ -- TOTAL AREA 1901 fc' i I cb I l � FTEM PLANnNG Udt Unk Celt Usde T Synnp reeculao'Mry Silk 2 5 -3' Cal 4 EA $500.00 $2,000.00 Gledal. arlarrMwe'Soxar K..pad - HONEY LOCUST r35- 14 EA $Z400.00 f33AM00 Glednk a7eandm'Shad—fte - HONEY LOCUST S'-SS' 7 EA $2400.00 $16AW00 Aar x hwwA'Amutronj - FREEMAN MARE 3-W Cal. 7 EA $650.00 $4S50.00 ar_. Ax Frernma'Ce6ebraden' - CELEBRATION MAPLE 3-3C.I.' C.I.C. 5 EA $6511M S3=00 - Ulna Am. k—'Princaan' - PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM r4S' Cal. 5 EA $1,600A0 58,000.00 Becule Npa'Heri ; 45'-5' C.I. S EA SI,50 M $7-MM 5 Gd Shrub, (Fydnnge., Uhc) 13 EA $MM rI0M 3 Gil. Shrub, (Nineb.rka Re, Sum.[) 173 EA $65.00 SI 1,24SM PI•r ng Su6med S87ASSA0 3%ef $250.000 67XI 2% ( S2S0.000 $5,000 I%dS7,500.000 $75AW MINIMUM TOTAL So ., I { I 1 I ( l I, I 03 ' e PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QTY SCIENTIFIC NM1E COMMON NAME SUE SRLONG DECIDUOUS TREES AA 7 Aar. Fra-1 Amuuen( FREEMAN MAPLE r-3S AS SHOWN AC S Aran. Freman6'C.lehradon' 3'-35' CAL 3'JS' CAL AS SHOWN BN S Barb ftm Nerlop' (Single Sam) RNM ERC34 r-35 CAL AS SHOWN GS 14 Glednl. utaal ha'Soaec K..W STREET KEEPER HONEY LOCLISr 4V5' AS SHOWN GT 7 Gledkrk aloanthoa'ShademasW SHADEMASTFA HONEY LOCUST 4'4S' CAL AS SHOWN SR 4 Sy+np recruka 1v«y Slk JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2r CAL AS SHOWN UA S Ulna Lanni—TrI oleen' PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM r-3.V AS SHOWN SHRUBS HL 6 Hydrrl{e. pNnha U& Quick Fin' DWARF PANICLE HYDRANGEA 65 S' O.C. PO 48 Rty-owl u. oI.Kdw'U d. DeNr NINESARK #3 30' O.0 TT 27 Taxu..-k-r--w TAUNTON YEW Ir-24- 4'O.C. SP 4 Syrho p.k6a 74ba KW MISS KM KOREAN ULAC 05 r O.C. RA 113 Rha Arend.a'G-4od DWARF FRAGRANT SUMAC #3 4' O.0 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES DC 82 Orrheepal capma TUFTED HAIR GRASS #! 20. 0.0 PE 22 Mb—d— •nYYle'GradlRma' MULALIA #2 30' O.0 SI 124 Spetehele. h.—I.pil. RUBE OROPSEED N2 X O.0 PERENNIALS NN N2 Nenwedlia Nw" Mara' DAYULY #1 Ir 0.0 RF 1 95 Rudle.M fuiIII& T[dd.vm' MAOL-EYED SAM1 1#1 $ t hN.MI�' �(.-T (Ip GT PLANTING NOTES I. All plot materl l In the plant sN ula shill be nunery grown In accordance wkh ANSI In accordance with 2.60 I Standards for mea.uremem a nursery ok 2. All Af oshall paranteed the Contractor !or a period ns one year from date of receipt of o rov f Pisiorul cceponce of dw completed Instillatlon by the Owner 3. Rephament plaMnp will be negated prior m Fiml Accepo o, for any pla wh'ch are mWin& no[— to ape ado Its- died or an unheakhy or uncharacoH,dc of the sp«Im (due to eat pruning dlebatk or other 4. All plant maanils shall be selected —tl tagged ss the nursery by Land.ape Arahnea S. The lan&a Archlt—e, pprowl a rcqu red for any pl— materhl sub... 6. The C.,—., is rmponsible for Immediately notifying the landscape Archk A any plant quantity diurepancim exist between the planting pM and the plan[ list 7. All shrubs and uses well be spayed with the antl-dmican[ ^Mk -Prue (or approved equal) prior to the first Winter (no her that Nowmher 30). B. Th. Land. C.—shay haw the Generil Conuattor I— all �� undaerground utilitim 6 areas to be I d.,ttl pn« m cammen.ing any Atli uee lotatiom wll be alb—t! where lality mAlto, are cImny a problem and wkh pnor tine approvil by Lwd.tape t,V Archk«t t� 9. M plan[ bed, shrub and tree lootlon shall be sraked'n tM field by Contrcror �1 for Landsape Archkecb approwl pion tonarilhtlon. 10. vn Adluseno to phut beds shrow all be appd by landaaeR pe Arthk II. Generil Contractor I. lesponsble for all .-.I- coned mcvurm dunng 17. All d.onbed areas are to b, topsdl*d and seeded a sodded, ss 'radiated 'n the planting plan. I7. Mulch shall coma[ of double -shredded hardwood mulch or approved egwl and Contractor h rmpomlble for p-Adiq saMI. of mulch to Land.rape Archkecc Mulch plant maariils ss .hown on phn and dera,ly 14. It I. the Imo« of thls contntt to avoid arty dkwrbance to edsting tram or shrubs on s. other than [ho.e .pe ifi-ly dm,p—d far trsnspW or emowl 15. llgwdated danry a for tram damaged by <onswmon operatlon shall be g500 per olllp«'nth. Shrub, sW be 6100 auk 16. Contractor Is tespomlble for wrdying and con0ml rag all plam [Dunn ss supph.d by the LaArchitectcape Architect whh fleld conditions ss constructed My dsctepano'. shill be reported m Landstap Arch— for approvil and d rso 17. Tree uanaphnti,g swl be performed by a .uiobk hyd .Ile tree .pade..¢ed n«es.ary m peform the work I R Pn« to commencement d airy con.truNon, ill exlstlng veer to remain shall r«Nve — protection fence at outer edge of dnpline wh—r —ubk. `ao -- T 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET WAGNER;dODGSON LA.NU5C Ai E ARCHITECTURE T941.864.0010 F.02,6646167 ww .wagnerhodgme..om LARKI N TERRACE PLANTING PLAN REVISIONS DRAWING NO. IoB No. 638 DATE 10.13.16 L200 30660 W SCALE OF FEET WAGNER 3 PHASE OVERHEAD TO REMAIN 3 PHASE OVERHEAD TO BE RETIRED I PHASE OVERHEAD TO REMAIN I PHASE OVERHEAD TO BE RETIRED 3 PHASE UNDERGROUNDTO BE RETIRED 3 PHASE UNDERGROUND - EXISTING 3 PHASE UNDERGROUND NEW I PHASE UNDERGROUND NEW LARKIN TERRACE ELECTRIC UTILITY DIAGRAM GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER REVISIONS .._.... ................... D—l"r ape— 638 0— 08.31. 16 2 e 1z w — ;,t ------ ar8 -- — -- --- as+---- 20& — — PRELIMINARY NOT FOR — — — — — — — — — — — CONSTRUCTION I B up DOWN I 0----- 2 ----- - - - - - - _ ---c 12 p d !K 12 UP I I I PARKING I GARAGE 53 PARKING SPACES I z I I I �J----_----- -- 2i-t134' 1x1�& --- ---- z GARAGE FLOOR PLAN QUIPMly ENf I I I I z Q W Q > O . 0 W m LLJS Y � Q it I I I i I t7 40 I I I I I I I I I I I 5 I I Q 40 f m 'O I I I I I � • � PROJECTM 12 15� I �1P ^ SHEET NUMBER I 2.Q I I V-? 9.o 130 A 101 6 s 8 n >z 13 8 09/14/2016 1 2 3 4 5 8 12 14 196-q17 3 4' 26.0' V 6V2" 424 204 PRELIMINARY 2-8W4' 7V4" 25' Of 7V4' U3'4 1V4" 41'-8W4' 7V4' 20-(W4' 7V4" ,74. 11 4 NOT FOR �- -- -- --- ---- --- -- B 13 UP I POWN 9-t C - - 13 - \J B 0 CONSTRUCTION GROCERY I I I SPACEI 13rh 5F 67 I I I I I I lr1 � I I I I I I 13 I LL- N 1 7V4' 26AW4" g3BW4" 77N2'-BW4" 7114" V4' I I 3 4' 26.0 q4' 4' 3 5V4' B1 0 Zi z c o i 1 It I N rn flX7 I 1 10 N FIRST FLOOR PLAN 43/32" _ V-0" APARTMENT LOBBY 10 - 10 1 LEASE SPACE + I I I LEASE A — ��JJI -� - O. O � J W � a 5 0 z K Z 7 Y SPACE c F 1654 SF Q R I I I 1 _ LL J I I I LEASE SPACE 312 5F ♦ � F �3. Sid � 13 I 3 Q to OTC 1 13 3 3 13 I _ - PROJECT a: 1SO4 SHEET NUMBER V4' IV4" 4.4W4' ',V4' k' 7J 512' 7 3' VP I2" 2" 7V4'R1314 1 2 N fn� 6 7 12 09/14/2016 [3-f 2 -W� jt±q 26'-4' 29 — 26-Y I 26-0' 26 O� 0 V2" 26-� 42 6V 20-8' 29-22 ,--512" PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM 13 owwoom 13 B 13 TYPE'? TYPE`?' TYPE? Til TYPE?' TYPE'?' F12011 F#2031 F-51 secsOPEN TO BELOW cl, --------- ------- - - 2 I 13 F, -1 1, its 1 <> I V r- -1 � /,\ L -J \ -I y r- X\ r- 2 L ONE BEDROOM ---- ---- o o TYPE'? z 2 K 2 . c o* ---------- ONE BEDROOM T3 -c TYPE'?' D ONE BEDROOM 1? ONE BEDROOM ONE BROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM L 1\3 TYPE TYPE ? — TYPE TYPE 1? TYPE? F12R] F12-1] Fq F21 7-= ii-A MA 0 OPEN TO BELOW 51, 1 1 25' W Y3 M21 5 V7 EN TO 34 26 9 1 1 1BELOW 26-q 261 26-7 3 544" 261 3 5V4 20 in -a, 1-111"-\ '-W 7V4'-' .10 4-6 5j 2 ELEVAT 10 7 SECOND FLOOR PLAN LOW 4 61rl 3/32" = V-0" 1 10. 13 2 z Lu TWO BEDROOM L _j ONE BEDROOM:5 u TYPE?' TYPE'? 2 F# 2 151 0;-, 11 w 0 1 = ui Q z F- ONE BEDROOM 2 ONE BEDROOM LL. z TYPE TYPE'? F L 13 Z 0 uj 2 13 ONE DEPROOM 2 ONE MO TYPE?' TYPE'? 13 7 PC t; !E E2 ONE BEDROOM ONE BROOM <c TYPE?' TYPE qq #220 F -i L F 2 L il PROJECT#: 1504 SHEET NUMBER —T510-1 4'-6 Irl 4-13W Vz 7-? 1 IC 27-33V' 5V2' ..,C VC A103 09/14/2016 1 2 3 4 5 qG-IOV2" 8 12 14 3-4' 26-4' 26-9 26 0 26 0' 26-0' 42 61T 20-6 PRELIMINARY q 2 3 '9 25-61C 112' }7 IV' z' 62'-612 Vl" R NOT FOR �— CONSTRUCTION . c e ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM 13 ONE DEW B 13 TYPE ? TYPE'?' TYPE'? TYPE? TYPE? 83G l3 33 z3� d30 309 ROOF TERRACE o c 377 rs 51TTING 3 r AREA p D - Q L J 2 3 L J 2 L J L J 2 2 L J 2 r _ J r r--1 2 r 2 r� L J ONE BEDROOM ---- ---- ---- ----o m ' 2 A 311 p c a MECHANICAL oo 2 ' ' ONE BEDROOM I UTILITY - - - - - — - - — - - o TYPE 7 ONE BEDROOM N BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM L 3 TYPE? TYPE?' TYPE 1? TYPE'? TYPE? 13 H V302 i!',A4 M306 ,C30B - 1310 7 2 ® -- c - TYPE'? 2-6314° 25-61YC b3�YJ112" l313 L J z° 7 U4" ill 3.4" 26.0' I I Y�'.4" I I 26-4" 26-P 26' 0 26-0' 26-0 0-734" 9-7 29-204' 2'-6114" N l30 k' 3 24-\ 5V2 2 , FlTl�55 I 2 5Yl 5V2" I I 10 J d �' THIRD FLOOR PLAN ELEvnroR °� � 1 ....... a--1 LOBBY 1 615, I I � O K 2 Z W TWO BEDROOM L J L ONE BEDROOM Q TYPE'? TYPE'? q oC z 0 !34 2 A3 n 0- Lu - L O m z ONE BEDROOM 2 ONE BEDROOM uJ. Z m TYPE? TYPE'? p Y o 316 -1 J L 13 O 6Q F - 2 M 13 ONE BEDROOM 2 ONE BEDF\OOM TYPE? TYPE? X319 r N319 32'-3314' 5 5r -3314" 1 s ONE BEDROOM ° 2 ° 1 ONE BEDROOM TYPE ? 1 TYPE? � qq 5� z32o r- J L a321 I qq t8 cc 2 � � E E 13 0 PROJECT#: 1504 SHEET NUMBER 5V2' 4'-642' Z 4'-1w 5e v 9' r 27-33W 5V2 A 104 P 02' 6 7 9 10 1 2 13 14 09/14/2016 D 2 T T % ov? (� 3 Dol�- 26 4' 26-0 26 C 26.01 26 0' 1 42 62 1 29 8' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR 13 - — - — - — - -- CONSTRUCTION ONE BEDROOM KDROOM ONE BEDROOM ONE BROOM 13 BROOM TYPE? TYPE ? TYPE ? TYPE ? F1409 TYPE? 1474701 1 ------ ---- ---- --------- ---------- 41 -------- L L L J L 3 � <>_ _J Ards _J A^l\ 2 _J (z)-A r- _1 F- N/ E_ -1 r- ---- .... L) 4> 13 il .0 MEWWAL /MY s ONE BEDROOM ROOF TERRACE- TYPE'? — I ONE BROOM ONE BROOM KDROOM ONE BEDROOM VA 13 1402 1 TYPE'? TYPE? TYPE'? TYPE ? F 1 & H -\ OL �13> , (D- . ___ — 9-2, ONE BE ml - --5V? 6v? W-ur TYPE'? L JCOMMUNn 61 11 14 w 0, I IX4 H ROOM 264 26.9 26 9 261 26-0' 5Pl 21-73W g.g 29.2W M' 4-6V? 15 ELEVAT 10 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN Lomy 1 3/32" V-0" V2' 10 2 z 2. 2 < uj TWO BEDROOM L L Of BROOM > TYPE ? 9 2� F_4�12 1 2 1 i413 0 0 0 W z ONE BEDROOM 2 ONE BEDROOM -Typf-? 6; z Epp TYPE'? -Er a F r J L 13 a 0 < tit so so D 0 2 PC ONE BEDROOM 2 ONE BEDROOM TYPE'? TYPE? 13 H32.3y? 9.6 32-33W H ONE BROOM q>. ONE BROOM TYPE ? TYPE ? F 13 2 cr_ A PROJECT #: 1504 SHEET NUMBER 3 V? W-W Li-5vz r.? i L-�,a 2 7-30 5 VC? '-6V? A105 I I p_pVz I, I 7 9 0 11 12 13 14 09/14/2016 No Text No Text TT AiTOP OF UPPER ROOF DECK 249-0'— — — — — — — — — — TOP OF ROOF DECK 246' - 0" FOURTH FLOOR 6' 0" — — — — — -- — — 23 THIRD FLOOR 26'-0,.-- — — — — — SECOND FLOOR �,_a, ---------- FIRST FLOOR R— — _ _ _ _ _ — _ 202' - O"— GARAGE FLOOR — _ _ _ _ _ 0" ATYPICAL BUILDING SECTION y1/4" = 1'-0" PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION v 0 z 0 ac Z W O u Q 5 Lu q DC 0 W z Zw Z pu Y m J o s � § t e 3 g5��3 y t _U Q m m PROJECT N: 1504 SHEET NUMBER A301 09/14/2016 i� ^u 91/4" 5/8° 'le3310 5/8" UNDERSIDE OF RATED A55EM13LY SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - LINE OF CEILING �1 APPLY FIN15H WHERE SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - FINISH FLOOR PARTITION TYPE ' ' BEARING WALL RATING - 1 HR STC RATING: 59 MIN. NOTES: 1. CARRY GYP. BOARD AND SOUND INSULATION TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR AND PARTY WALLS SEPARATING ADJOINING UNITS (TYP. 2. "BACK-TO-BACK" WIRING DEVICES NOT ALLOWED - STAGGER LOCATIONS OF ALL OUTLETS, SWITCHES, ETC. 3. PROVIDE TWO CONTINUOUS BEAD5 OF ACOUSTIC SEALANT AT BOTTOM PLATE AND TOP PLATE OF ALL PARTY WALLS SEPARATING LIVING UNITS. 1. WOOD OTU05: NOM 2 BY 4 IN., SPACED 24 IN. O.C. MAX. (SEE STRUCTURAL) GROSS BRACED AT MID HEIGHT AND EFFECTIVELY FIRE5TOPPED AT TOP AND 501TOM OF WALL. NO MIN. AIR SPACE BETWEEN STUD ROWS EXCEPT" TO ACCOMMODATE ATTACHMENT OF SHEATHING, WHERE REQUIRED. SEE ITEMS 4 AND 5. 2. GYPSUM BOARD: ANY 5/8 IN. THICK GYPSUM PANELS SUPPLIED BY THE CLASSIFIED COMPANIES LISTED BELOW. APPLIED HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY AND ATTACHED TO STUDS AND BEARING PLATES WITH 11/4 IN. LONG TYPE W COARSE THREAD GYPSUM PANEL STEEL 5CREW5 SPACED AT 8 IN. O.C., WITH LAST SCREW 1 IN. FROM EDGE OF BOARD. WHEN USED IN WIDTHS OTHER THAN 48 IN., GYPSUM TO BE INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO OR APPROVED EQUAL - CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 3. JOINTS AND NAILHEA05: WALLBOARD JOINTS OF OUTER LAYER COVERED WITH TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. NAIL HEADS OF OUTER LAYER COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS. PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. 4. 5HEATHING: ((MAY OCCUR, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS) BE MAY BE SHEATHED WITH MIN. 7/16 IN. THICK WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS MIN. GRADE "C-D' OR "SHEATHING" OR MIN 1/2 IN. THICK MINERAL AND FIBER BOARDS (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK) 5. BATTS AND BLANKETS: (BEARING THE UL CLA551FICAIION MARK) 31/2" MAX THICKNESS GLA55 OR MINERAL FIBER BATT INSULATION. OPTIONAL WHEN SHEATHING (ITEM 4) 15 USED ON BOTH HALVES OF THE WALL. I REFERENCE NOTES I 1. SEE BUILDING 5ECnON6 FOR A55EM15LIE5 NOT INDICATED HERE. 2. PROVIDE LEVEL 5 FINISH ON ALL GYP. BD. PARTITIONS IN LOBBY. 3. GYF5UM BOARD TO BE M015TURE & MOLD RE515TANT TYPE IN ALL BATHROOMS AND RE51ROOM5. 4. FIT IN5ULA11ON TIGHTLY BETWEEN STUDS AND SECURELY FASTEN TO 5TUD5. 5. USE PRE551URE TREATED WOOD AT ALL LOCATIONS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE. 6. VERIFY FIRE RATINGS FOR ALL RATED WALLS, AND PRODUCTS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE. 7. STUD 51ZE5 & SHEATHING NOTED FOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ONLY. ALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STUD SIZES & SHEATHING TO BE DESIGNED BY REGISTERED ENGINEER 8. 5TC AND IIC RATINGS INDICATED ARE MINIMUMS TO BE PROVIDED. 71/4" 5/8" 512 5/8" 1/2' UNDERSIDE OF RATED A55EMBLY SEALANT, BOTH 51DE5- u Z APPLY FIN15H WHERE SHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - FINISH FLOOR - 2 PARTITIONE ' ' BEARING WALL RATING - 1 HR STC RATING: 50 NOTES: 1. "BACK-TO-BACK" WIRING DEVICES NOT ALLOWED - STAGGER LOCATIONS OF ALL OUTLETS, SWITCHES, ETC. 2. PROVIDE TWO CONTINUOUS BEADS OF ACOUSTIC SEALANT AT BOTTOM PLATE AND TOP PLATE OF ALL CORRIDOR WALLS. 1. WOOD 5TUD5: NOM 2 BY 6 IN., SPACED AT 16 IN. O.C. EFFECTIVELY GRO55 BRACED. 2. RESILIENT CHANNEL 25 MSG GALV STEEL RESILIENT CHANNELS 5PACED VERTICALLY 24 IN. O.C.. FLANGE PORTION SCREW ATTACHED TO ONE SIDE OF STUDS WITH 11/4 IN. LONG DIAMOND SHAPED POINT, DOUBLE LEAD PHILLIPS HEAD STEEL SCREWS. 3. GYPSUM BOARD: (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK) 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FEET WIDE. SCREW ATTACHED ONE SIDE TO FURRING CHANNELS WITH 1 IN. LONG, SELF -DRILLING, SELF -TAPPING SCREWS, SPACED 12 IN. O.C., VERTICAL JOINTS LOCATED MIDWAY BETWEEN 5TUD5 AND BACK BLOCKED WITH FURRING CHANNELS, ATTACHED WITH 1 IN. LONG, SELF -DRILLING, SELF -TAPPING SCREWS, SPACED 12 IN. O.C., ALONG EACH EDGE. WALLBOARD ATTACHED OTHER SIDE TO 511U05 WITH 11/4 IN. LONG DIAMOND SHAPED POINT, DOUBLE LEAD PHILLIPS HEAD STEEL SCREWS SPACED 12 IN. O.C., VERTICAL JOINTS LOCATED OVER STUDS. CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC - TYPE FRPC, PROROC TYPE C CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY - TYPES C, IP-X2, ?C-AR G-P GYPSUM CORP, SUB OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP - TYPE 5 NATIONAL GYPSUM CO - TYPES F5K-C, F5W-C, F5W-G PABCO GYPSUM - TYPE C OR PG-C UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - TYPES C, IP-X2, IPC-AR OR APPROVED EQUAL - CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 4. BATTS AND BLANKETS: (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK 3 IN. THICK MINERAL WOOL BATTS, PLACED TO FILL INTER OR OF WALL, ATTACHED TO THE 41N. FACE OF THE STUDS WITH STAPLES PLACED 24 IN. O.C. ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO - DELTA BOARD JOHNS MANViLLE INTERNATIONAL INC ROXULINC THERMAFIBER INC - TYPE SAFE 4A. GLA55 FIBER INSULATION (AS AN ALTERNATE TO ITEM 41 3 IN. THICK GLA56 FIBER BATT BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING AS TO SURFACE BURNING AND/OR FIRE RESISTANCE, FRICTION -FITTED TO FILL THE INTERIOR OF THE WALL. SEE BAITS AND BLANKETS ((BKNV OR BZJZ) CATEGORIES FOR NAMES OF CLASSIFIED GOMPANIE5 5. JOINTS AND SCREW HEADS: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS. PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. GENERAL NOTE SCREWS MEETING ASTM C1002, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR STEEL SELF -PIERCING TAPPING SCREWS FOR THE APPLICATION OF GYPSUM PANEL PRODUCTS OR METAL PLASTER BASES TO WOOD STUDS OR STEEL STUD5." OR ASTM C954, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR STEEL DRILL SCREWS FOR THE APPLICATION OF GYPSUM PANEL PRODUCTS OR METAL PLASTER BASES TO STEEL STUDS FROM 0,033 IN. O.64 MM) TO 0.112 IN. (2.84 MM) IN THICKNESS,' MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR NAILS, ONE OR ONE, WHEN THE HEAD DIAMETER, LENGTH, AND SPACING EQUAL OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SPECIFIED NAILS. a' 3314' 2x6 STUD SHOWN 6 3/4" 5/.1 5U2 5/8" 5/8" 1" OTHER TUS BELOW 5/8" 512 5/5" PRELIMINARY 5/8" I 5/8" 5/8' 1/2" V NOT FOR UNDERSIDE OF RATED ASSEMBLY (fYP.) UNDERSIDE OF RATED A55EMBLY MR) LINE OF CEILING CONSTRUCTION SEALANT, BOTH SIDES °1 SEALANT, BOTH SIDES SEALANT, BOTH 51DE5 c 3 4" 1 4 2 0 4 ? I 1 2 1 s 5 3 2 Z o � o .n APPLY °S S SHOWNFON ROOM + SHOWNFON ROOM ERE SHOWNFON ROOM $' APPLY APPLY FINISH SCHEDULE ;: FINISH SCHEDULE it FINISH SCHEDULE SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - FINISH FLOOR PARTITION TYPE T SCALE: 1-1 2° = 1'-0, BEARING WALL RATING - 2 HR NOTE: 1. PROVIDE TWO CONTINUOUS BEAD5 OF ACOUSTIC SEALANT AT BOTTOM PLATE AND TOP PLATE OF ALL STAIR WALLS. 2. CARRY GYPSUM BOARD AND SOUND INSULATION TO UNDERSIDE OF FLOOR AT STAIR WALLS. 1. WOOD STUDS: NOM 2 BY 4 MIN. (SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS), EFFECTIVELY CROSS BRACED AND FIRESTOPPED. 2. NAILHEADS: EXPOSED OR COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. 3. JOINTS: EXPOSED JOINTS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND AND PAPER TAPE. JOINT COMPOUND AND PAPER TAPE MAY BE OMITTED WHEN SQUARE EDGE BOARDS ARE USED. AS AN ALTERNATE, NOM 3/32 IN. THICK GYPSUM VENEER PLASTER MAY BE APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF CLASSIFIED VENEER BASEBOARD WITH THE JOINTS REINFORCED WITH PAPER TAPE. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. 4. NAILS: 6D CEMENT COATED NAIL51-7/5 IN. LONG, 0.0915 IN. SHANK DIAM,1/4 IN. DIAM HEADS, AND 81) CEMENT COATED NAILS 2-3/8 IN. LONG, 0.113 IN. SHANK DIAM, 9/32 IN. DIAM HEADS. 5. GYPSUM BOARD" 5/5 IN. THICK, TWO LAYERS APPLIED EITHER HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY. INNER LAYER ATTACHED TO 51U05 WITH THE 1-7/8 IN. SCREWS 5PACED 6 IN. OC. OUTER LAYER ATTACHED TO STUDS OVER INNER LAYER WITH THE 2-3/8 IN. LONG SCREWS SPACED 8 IN. OC. VERTICAL JOINTS LOCATED OVER STUDS. ALL JOINTS IN FACE LAYERS STAGGERED WITH JOINTS IN BASE LAYERS. JOINTS OF EACH BASE LAYER OFFSET WITH JOINTS OF BASE LAYER ON OPPOSITE SIDE. WHEN USED IN WIDTHS OTHER THAN 48 IN., GYPSUM BOARD TO BE INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. ACADIA DRYWALL SUPPLIES LTD TYPE X AMERICAN GYPSUM GO TYPES AGX-1, M-GLASS, AG-C, AGX-11. CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC TYPES 1, FRPC, EGRG, GLA5ROC, TYPE C OR TYPE X. CERTAINTEED GYPSUM CANADA INC TYPE C, TYPE X, TYPE ABUSE -RESISTANT. CGC INC TYPES AR, C, IP-AR, IF -XI, IF-X2, PC -AR, SCX, 5HX, ULX, WPC, WRX . GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM L L C TYPES 5, 6, 9, C. DAP, DO, DA, DAPC, DGG, 06, GPF56. L5, TG-C, TYPE X. VENEER PLASTER G LYVGA, vvnt- Rn IGV - I I rC LY-A, Vvv lMINU - I TYC LWLA, SOFFIT - TYPE LW2X, TYPE DGI2W, WATER RATED - TYPE DGI2W, SHEATHING - TYPE OGL2W. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO TYPES FSK, F5K-C, FOK-G, FSW, F5W-3. F5W-5, F5W-6, F5W-C, F5W-G, FSMR-C, FBI.. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO TYPES AR, C, FRX-G, IP-AR, IP-X1, IP-X2, IPC-AR, 5CX, SHX, ULX, USGX, WPC, WRY. 6. BAITS AND BLANKETS: 3 IN. THICK GLASS FIBER BATTS BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING AS TO SURFACE BURNING AND/OR FIRE RESISTANCE, FRICTION -FITTED TO FILL THE STUD CAVITIES. SEE BATTS AND BLANKETS (BKNV OR BZJZ) CATEGORIES FOR NAMES OF CLASSIFIED COMPANIES. SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - FIN15H FLOOR SCALE: RTITION TYPE '4' BEARING WALL RATING - 2 HR 1. FLOOR, SIDE, AND CEILING RUNNERS: "J" SHAPED RUNNER, 21/2 IN. WIDE WITH UNEQUAL LE05 OF 1 IN. AND 2 IN., FABRICATED FROM 24 MSG GALV STEEL. RUNNERS POSITIONED WITH SHORT LEG TOWARD FINISHED SIDE OF WALL. RUNNERS ATTACHED TO 5TRUCT. SUPPORTS WITH STEEL FASTENERS LOCATED NOT GREATER THAN 2 IN. FROM ENDS AND NOT GREATER THAN 24 IN. O.C. 2. STEEL STUDS: "C-H" SHAPED STUDS, MIN. 2 1/2 IN. DEEP FABRICATED FROM 25 MSG GALV STEEL. CUT TO LENGTHS 3/6 TO 1/2 IN. LESS THAN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT AND SPACED 24 IN. OR 000 MM O.C. 3. GYPSUM BOARD" GYPSUM LINER PANELS, NOM 1 IN. THICK. 24 AD 3/4 IN. LEGS -6 ATTACHED TO IN. LONG TYPE 5 00. WHEN WALL I BE WITH THAN WITH SIX 1-1/2 IN. LONG TYPE G STEEL SCREWS, THREE SCREWS ALONG THE 22 IN. DIMENSION AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE STRIPS. ACCEPTABLE GYPSUM BOARD AS FOLLOWS: CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY - TYPE 51-X UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - TYPE SLX U567 MEXICO S A DE C V - TYPE SLX 4. GYF5UM PANELS. WITH BEVELED, SQUARE OR TAPERED EDGES, NOM. 1/2 IN. OR 5/8 IN. THICK, 48 IN. OR 1200 MM WIDE, APPLIED VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY IN TWO LAYERS. INNER OR BASE LAYER ATTACHED TO STUDS WITH 1 IN. LONG TYPE 5 STEEL SCREWS SPACED 24 IN. OC WHEN INSTALLED VERTICALLY OR 16 IN. OC WHEN INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. OUTER OR FACE LAYER ATTACHED TO STUDS WITH 1-5/8 IN. LONG TYPE 5 STEEL SCREWS SPACED 12 IN. OC WHEN INSTALLED VERTICALLY AND STAGGERED 12 IN. FROM BASE LAYER SCREWS OR 8 IN. OC WHEN INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY AND STAGGERED 8 IN. FROM BASE LAYER SCREWS. HORIZONTAL JOINTS BETWEEN INNER AND OUTER LAYERS STAGGERED A MIN OF 12 IN. HORIZONTAL JOINTS NEED NOT BE BACKED BY STEEL FRAMING. VERTICAL JOINTS CENTERED OVER STUDS AND STAGGERED 24 IN. CGC INC 1/2 IN. TYPE C, IP-X2, IPC-AR OR WRC; 5/8 IN. TYPES AR, C, IP-AR, IF-X1, IP-X2, IPC-AR, 5CX, 5HX, ULX, WRC, WRX UNITED STATES GYPSUM GO 1/2 IN. TYPES C. III-X2, IPC-AR, OR WRC; 5/8 IN. TYPES AR, C. FRX-G, IP-AR, IP-X1, IP-X2, [PC -AR, 5CX, SOX, 5HX, ULX, U50X, WPC, WRX USG MEXICO 5 A DE C V 1/2 IN. TYPES G, IF-X2, ]PC -AR OR WRC; 5/5 IN. TYPES AR, C, T-AR, IP-X1, IP-X2, VC -AR, 5CX, SHX, ULX, WRC, WRX 5. BAITS AND BLANKETS: (NOT SHOWN) MINERAL WOOL OR GLASS FIBER BAITS PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY FILLING STUD CAVITY. ANY MINERAL WOOL OR GLASS FIBER BAIT MATERIAL BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING AS TO FIRE RESISTANCE. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, BOTH SIDES - FINISH FLOOR RTITION TYPES' AND'6' SCALE: 1-1/2" = V-0" O2x4 STUD O a(e STUD NON RATED INTERIOR WALL 5TC RATING: 35-39 EST. 1. WOOD STUDS: NOM 2 BY ( SEE PLAN ), SPACED AT 16 IN. O.C. EFFECTIVELY CROSSED BRACED. 2. GYPSUM BOARD: 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 3. BATTS AND BLANKETS: OPTIONAL ) MINERAL WOOL OR GLA55 IBER INSULATION, PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELYFILLING STUD CAVITY. 4. JOINTS AND NAILHEAD5: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. STRAP BETWEEN STUDS AS REQUIRED FOR J-BOX LOCATE A STUD ON THE - WHERE J-BOXES ARE NAILED - TO STUDS, THE NAILS ARE TO BE SUCH LENGTH TO NOT PENETRATE THRU THE STUD 1/16" THICK RESILIENT PADS - BETWEEN STUDS AND J-BOXES ELECTRICAL OUTLETJ-BOX - (FEE NOTE 1) NOTES 1. ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOXE5 AND SIMILAR BOXES FOR TV, PHONE, ETC. IN PARTY WALLS MUST NOT BE OVER 16" SQUARE. SUCH BOXES ARE TO BE SEALED W/ 3M MPP-45 FIRE BARRIER PUDGY PAD OR EQUAL. STACK MULTIPLE BOXES VERTICALLY WHEN ON SAME SIDE OF WALL 2. DETAIL SHOWN 15 FOR PARTITION TYPE PT-1, INSTALLATION IN OTHER PARTITION TYPES SIMILAR. 3. INSTALLATION OF J-5OXE5 SHOWN MUST BE USED IN ALL WALLS WITH A REQUIRED FIRE RATING. r,-J-BOX INSTALLATION 1 SCALE: 1-1/2" = V-0" IA W J m W V1 4 Z O a a W 4 2' z O W z D Z m F O �� J SHEET NUMBER A701 DATE: 09/14/2016 2X4 STUD SHOWN 1/8' SEE BELOW FOR OTHER STUD SIZES 11 3/4" 312" . 75/81f2. 75/8" LINE OF CEILING �' UNDERSIDE OF RATED ASSEMDLYEMDLY SEALANT, ONE SIDE p. SEALANT, ONE SIDE 1 LAYER 5/8" TH. TYPE'T' q- GYPSUM WALL BOARD 3/8" GYP. BOARD FINISH MAY OCCUR f LINE OF CEILING -------------- - -----------i ,.. APPLY FINISH WHERE 1 CHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE NOM 2X4 STUD FURRING (MAY OCCUR, SEE TYPES BELOW) ` 2 � S S Z Z APPLY FINISH WHERE j 3 (� SHOWN ROOMa ` FINISH SCHEDULE E SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, ONE SIDE FINISH FLOOR - PARTITION TYPE '7' AND '8' SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'4' O 2X4 STUD O 2X6 STUD NON RATED INTERIOR WALL 5TC RATING: 35-39 EST. 1. WOOD STUDS: NOM 2 BY ( SEE PLAN ), SPACED AT 16 IN. O.C. EFFECTIVELY CROSSED BRACED. 2. GYPSUM BOARD•. 5/6 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 3. BATTS AND BLANKETS: OPTIONAL MINERAL WOOL OR GLA55 IBEP INSU TION, PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY FILLING STUD CAVITY. 4. JOINTS AND NAILHEADS: WALLBOARD JOINT5 COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXP05ED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. REFERENCE NOTES 1. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS FOR ASSEMBLIES NOT INDICATED HERE. 2. PROVIDE LEVEL 5 FINISH ON ALL GYP. BD. PARTITIONS IN LOBBY. A GYPSUM BOARD TO BE MOISTURE & MOLD RESISTANT TYPE IN ALL BATHROOMS AND RE6TROOM5. 4. FIT INSULATION TIGHTLY BETWEEN 5TUD5 AND SECURELY FASTEN TO STUDS. 5. USE PRESSURE TREATED WOOD AT ALL LOCATIONS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE- 6. VERIFY FIRE RATINGS FOR ALL RATED WALLS, AND PRODUCTS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE. 7. STUD 51ZE5 & SHEATHING NOTED FOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ONLY. ALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STUD SIZES & SHEATHING TO BE DESIGNED BY REGISTERED ENGINEER. 8. 5TC AND IIC RATINGS INDICATED ARE MINIMUMS TO BE PROVIDED. GENERAL NOTE SCREWS MEETING A5TM C1002, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR STEEL SELF -PIERCING TAPPING SCREWS FOR THE APPLICATION OF GYPSUM PANEL PRODUCTS OR METAL PLASTER BASES TO WOOD STUDS OR STEEL 6TUD5;' OR A51M C954, "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR STEEL DRILL SCREWS FOR THE APPLICATION OF GYPSUM PANEL PRODUCTS OR METAL PIASTER BASES TO STEEL STUDS FROM OA33 IN. 0.84 MM) TO 0.112 IN. (2.84 MM) IN THICKNE55; MAY BE 5UB5TTUT�D FOR NAILS, ONE OR ONE, WHEN THE HEAD DIAMETER, LENGTH, AND SPACING EQUAL OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SPECIFIED NAILS. SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, ONE SIDE FIN15H FLOOR �� PARTITION TYPE'9' AND'10' SCALE: 1-1/2" = 1'-0" O3/8" GYP BOARD FINISH ONE SIDE ONLY @ 3-1/2" FURRING ONE SIDE ONLY BEARING WALL RATING - 2 HR 1. CONCRETE BLOCK5: (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK) VARIOUS DESIGNS, CLASSIFICATION 0-2. 2. MORTAR: BLOCKS LAID IN FULL BED OF MORTAR, NOM. 3/8 IN. THICK, OF NOT LE55 THAN 21/4 AND NOT MORE THAN 31/2 PARTS OF CLEAN SHARP SAND TO 1 PART PORTLAND CEMENT (PROPORTIONED BY VOLUME). VERTICAL JOINTS STAGGERED. 3. GYPSUM BOARD: 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 4. JOINTS AND NAILHEA05: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. 1'-01/8" 5/8" 31l2' 8" UNDERSIDE OF RATED ASSEMBLY SEALANT, ONE SIDE 1 LAYER 5/8" TH. TYPE'W' - GYPSUM WALL BOARD LINE OF CEILING APPLY FINISH WHERE -� SHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE NOM 2X4 STUD FURRING MAY OCCUR, SEE TYPES BE +. 7/8" HAT CHANNEL (MAY OCCUR, SEE TYPES BELOW) qq SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT, ONE SIDE FINISH FLOOR PARTITION TYPE 111' BEARING WALL RATING - 2 HR 1. 2 HOUR RATED WALL - SEE WALL TYPE '3' 1. WOOD 5TU05: NOM 2 BY 4, SPACED AT 24 IN. O.C. 3. GYPSUM BOARD: 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 4. JOINTS AND NAILHEADS: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FIN19H IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. LINE OF CEILING : 5/8" z ------------------------------------ APPLY FINISH WHERE SHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE -- 2 4 3 1 SCHEDULED FLOORING AND - BASE ' SEALANT, ONE SIDE FINISH FLOOR � 12 PARTITION TYPE '12' NON RATED INTERIOR FURRING 1. METAL FURRING. 2" Z-FURRING CHANNEL, SPACED AT 24 IN. O.0 2. GYPSUM BOARD: 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 PT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 3. JOINTS AND NAILHEA05: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXP05ED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. 2X6 STUD SHOWN 8 1/8" SEE FLOOR PLANS 512 2" OTHER STUD SIZES SEALANT APPLY FINISH WHERE SHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE SCHEDULED FLOORING AND BASE SEALANT FINISH FLOOR PARTITION TYPE'13'- EXTERIOR 13 ALE: 1-1 = 1 -0 BEARING WALL RATING - 1 HR (EXPOSED TO FIRE ON INTERIOR FACE ONLY) FINISH RATING 23 MIN 1. WOOD STUDS NOM 2 BY 4 IN. (MIN.) SPACED 16 IN. OC WITH TWO 2 BY 4 IN. TOP AND ONE 2 BY 4 IN. BOTTOM PLATES. STUDS LATERALLY -BRACED BY WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING (ITEM 5) WALLS EFFECTIVELY FIRE STOPPED AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF WALL 2. GYPSUM BOARD" ANY 5/8 IN. THICK UL CLA561FIED GYPSUM BOARD THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR USE IN DE51GN NOS. L501, 0512 OR U305. NOM 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED VERTICALLY AND NAILED TO STUDS AND BEARING PLATES 7 IN. OC WITH 61) CEMENT -COATED NAIL5,1-7/8 IN. LONG WITH 1/4 IN. DIAM HEAD. ACADIA DRYWALL SUPPLIES LTD TYPE X (FINISH RATING 22 MIN) AMERICAN GYPSUM CO TYPES AGX-1(FINI9H RATING 23 MIN. M-GLASS (FINISH RATING 23 MIN. , TYPE AGX-11 (FINISH RA G 26 MIN), TYPE LIGHTROC (FINISH LNG 22 MIN) OR TYPE AG-C CERTAINTEED TYPE 1. TYPE 5F3 (FINISH20 MIN) OR FRPC, TYPEUC OIR NC TYPE X (FINISH RATING 26 M N), RATINTYPE EGRG OR GLA5ROC (FINISH RATING 23 MIN) CERTAINTEED GYPSUM CANADA INC TYPE C. TYPE X OR TYPE ABUSE-RE515TANT (FINISH RATING 26 MIN) CGC INC APMFINISH RATING 24 MIN). TYPE C (FINISH IPC-)RATARTY(FIN SH)RPE IP-X2 ((ATING 24MIN),TYPE IP-XI (R (FINISH R F NISH RATING 24 MINRATING 24 MIN),1YPE 5HFINISH XA(FIN (FINISH 24MIIN)),(FIPE ULX (FINISH RATING 22 MIN), TYPE WRC (FINISH RATING 24 MIN), TYPE WKX (FINISH RATING 24 MIN). M NORCIRATING TYPETING 20 6(FIN15H RATING 23 NTY9(FIN H RATING G�IN)) (F(FIN ERAG20MI�GPF11NISH ING MIN ,YP SY) TI)G 26 P6D FS6HRA�20MIN DA, TYPE DAPCP(H R NATIONAL GYPSUM CO TYPE FSK (FINISH RATING 20 MINN;. TYPE F5KMIN)--G (FIN15H RATING 20 MIN TY2P4E MEN) FINISH RAT (FIN20 ISH RAZING 20 MIN?TYPEISH RATrIF5W-5 (FIN15H RATING 22 MIN)), TYPE FSW-G (FINISH RATING 20 MIN), TYPE F5K-C (FINISH IRA NG 20 FSW-6 (FINISH RATING 20 MIN), TYPE F51L (FINISH RATING 24 MIN). UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO TYPE AR (FINISH(( RATING 24 MINISH RATING22)), MINE) C FINIP-AR IN 5H RATING 24 MIN), TYPENPC AR FINSH9 RATING 24 MIN), TYPE IP-Xi (FINISH RATING 24 MIN ,TYPE MIN , FINIS5G 24 MIN)(FIRATING SH RATTI24 NG 24MINN()X FTYPE SG (FINISH 4 (A�H RATNG 2TYPE M N), PE IWRC (FINI H RATING 24 MIN 3. JOINTS AND NAILHEAD5 (NOT SHOWN) WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. NAIL HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. 4. BATT5 AND BLANKETS" MINERAL FIBER OR GLA95 FIBER INSULATION, 3-1/2 IN. THICK, PRESSURE FIT TO FILL WALL CAVITIES BETWEEN STUDS AND PLATES. MINERAL FIBER INSULATION TO BE UNFACED AND TO HAVE A MIN DENSITY OF 3 PCF. GLASS FIBER INSULATION TO BE FACED WITH ALUMINUM FOIL OR KRAFT PAPER AND TO HAVE A MIN DENSITY OF 0.9 PCF (MIN R-13 THERMAL INSULATION RATING). 5. 2 IN THICK EXTERIOR INSULATION SYSTEM. ("ZIP 5Y5TEM" OR APPROVED EQUAL). R-7.5 MIN. 6. EXTERIOR FACINGS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACRIRER'5 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. ONE OF THE FOLLOWING EXTERIOR FACINGS 15 TO BE APPLIED OVER THE SHEATHING: A. WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL OR LAP SIDING APA RATED SIDING, EXTERIOR, PLYWOOD, 055 OR COMPOSITE PANELS WITH VENEER FACES AND STRUCTURAL WOOD CORE, PER PS OR APA STANDARD PRP-108, INCLUDING TEXTURED, ROUGH SAWN, MEDIUM DENSITY OVERLAY, BRUSHED, GROOVED AND LAP SIDING. B. BRICK VENEER ANY TYPE ON NOM 4 IN. WIDE BRICK VENEER. WHEN BRICK VENEER 15 USED, THE RATING 15 APPLICABLE NTH EXPOSURE ON EITHER FACE. BRICK VENEER FASTENED WITH CORRUGATED METAL WALL TIES ATTACHED OVER SHEATHING TO WOOD STUDS WITH 80 NAIL PER TIE:- TIES SPACED NOT MORE THAN EACH SIXTH COURSE OF BRICK AND MAX 32 IN. OC HORIZONTALLY. ONE IN. AIR SPACE PROVIDED BETWEEN BRICK VENEER AND SHEATHING. C. FIBER -CEMENT SIDING FIBER -CEMENT EXTERIOR SIDINGS INCLUDING SMOOTH AND PATTERNED PANEL OR LAP SIDING. 7. NON -BEARING WALL PARTITION INTERSECTION (OPTIONAL) TWO NOMINAL 2 BY 4 IN. STUD OR NOMINAL 2 BY 6 IN. STUD NAILED TOGETHER WITH TWO 31N. LONG 101) NAILS SPACED A MAX. 16 IN. OC. VERTICALLY AND FASTENED TO ONE SIDE OF THE MINIMUM 2 BY 4 IN. STUD WITH 3 IN. TANG 100 NAILS SPACED A MAX 16 IN. OC. VERTICALLY. INTERSECTION BETWEEN PARTITION WOOD STUDS TO BE FLUSH WITH THE 2 BY 4 IN. STUDS. THE WALL PARTITION WOOD STUDS ARE TO BE FRAMED BY WITH A SECOND 2 BY 4 IN. WOOD STUD FASTENED WITH 3 IN. LONG 10D NAILS SPACED A MAX 16 IN. OC. VERTICALLY. MAXIMUM ONE NON -BEARING WALL PARTITION INTERSECTION PER STUD CAVITY. NON -BEARING WALL PARTITION STUD DEPTH SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE BEARING WALL 4 347 5/8" - 5/8" 2 APPLY FINISH WHERE SHOWN ON ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE w SCHEDULED FLOORING AND w BASE ai SEALANT, BOTH SIDES FINISH FLOOR PARTITION TYPE'1 ' SCALE: 1-1/2- I-0' NON RATED INTERIOR HALF WALL 1. WOOD STUDS: NOM 2 BY 4 IN., SPACED AT 16 IN. O.C. EFFECTIVELY CROSSED BRACED. 2. GYPSUM BOARD: 5/8 IN. THICK, 4 FT WIDE, APPLIED EITHER VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY, SCREW ATTACHED TO STUDS 3. JOINTS AND NAILHEAD5: WALLBOARD JOINTS COVERED WITH PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND. SCREW HEADS COVERED WITH JOINT COMPOUND. NOTE: PROVIDE LEVEL 4 FINISH IN ALL EXPOSED AREAS PROVIDE A MIN. LEVEL 2 FINISH IN CONCEALED (NOT VISIBLE) AREAS. PRELIMINARY NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION a 0 z 0 z cA W_ J Cm C W V1 LA Q z O H H Q a H M,2 ' SHEET NUMBER A702 4. 2"EXTRUDEO POLYSTYRENE INSULATION DATE: n1 HOUR FLOOR CEILING ASSEMBLY 1 SCALE: 1 UNRESTRAINED ASSEMBLY RATING - 1 1/2 HR FINISH RATING -13 MIN. G NOTE: 1. SUBSTITUTE 1 LAYER OF 1-1/8" ADVANTEC FLOOR SHEATHING IN LIEU OF SEPARATE 5UBFLOOR AND FINISH FLOOR SHEATHING IF ACCEPTABLE TO LOCAL CODE AUTHORITY. t 2. SUBSTITUTE (212X8'5 FOR REQUIRED 3X8 FLOOR FRAMING PER APPROVAL OF LOCAL CODE AUTHORITY. 1. FINISH FLOOR 1 BY 4 IN. T&G; LAID PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS, OR 5/8 I, . PLYWOOD WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS, MIN GRADE "UNDERLAYMENT'. FACE GRAIN OF PLYWOOD TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS WITH JOINTS STAGGERED 2. BUILDING PAPER (NOT TO BE USED WITH SYSTEM NO. 9) COMMERCIAL RED ROSIN, 0.010 IN. THICK 3. 8UBFLOOR NOT TO BE USED WITH SYSTEM NO. 9)1 BY 6 IN. T&G. LAID DIAGONALLY, R 1/2 IN. PLYWOOD WDOO STRUCTURAL PANELS, MIN GRADE "GD' . FACE GRAIN OF PLYWOOD TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS WITH JOINTS STAGGERED. 4. BRIDGING 1 BY 3 IN. 5. WOOD J015TO 3 BY 8 IN.,16 IN. OC, FIRESTOPPED. 6. HANGER WIRE NO. 12 SAG GALV STEEL, ATTACHED TO JOISTS WITH 200 COMMON NAILS SPACED 48 IN. OC ALONG EACH MAIN RUNNER AND ADJACENT TO MAIN RUNNER SPLICES. HANGER WIRES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO MAIN RUNNER/CROSS TEE INTER5F_C11ON5. Z STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS' MAIN RUNNERS NOM 12 FT LONG, SPACED 4 FT OC. CRO65 TEES NOM 4 FT LONG INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO MAIN RUNNERS AND SPACED 2 FT OC. WHEN NOM 24 BY 24 IN. LAY -IN PANELS ARE USED, CRO65 TEES NOM 2 FT LONG INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO 4 FT CROSS TEE 6 MIDWAY MAIN RUNNERS. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC TYPES AFG, AFG-A. TYPE GLBP (CONS16TiNG OF MAIN RUNNERS. 4 FT CRO55 TES AND STEEL STRAPS) FOR USE ' • WITH 24 BY 48 IN. TYPE P OR PC LAY -IN PANELS. CHICAGO METALLIC COPP TYPES 250, 260,1250,1260. lb50,1860. 7A. STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS' MAIN RUNNERS, NOM.10 OR 12 FT LONG, SPACED 4 FT OC. CP050 TEES, NOM. FT LONG INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO MAIN RUNNERS, PACED 2 FT OC. WHEN NOM. 2 BY 2 FT LAY -IN PANELS ARE USED, NOM. 2 FT LONG =55 TES INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO 4 FT CROSS TEES AT MIDSPAN, 511ACED 4 FT OC. BORDER PANELS SUPPORTED AT WALLS BY MIN. OA16 IN. THICK PAINTED STEEL ANGLE WITH 7/8 IN. LEGS OR MIN. 0.016 IN. THICK PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL WITH A 1 BY 1-9116 BY IN. PROFILE CGC INC TYPES DXL, DXLA, OXLZ, OXLZA, SDXL, 5DXLA, ZXLA. U5G INTERIORS LLC TYPES CAL, OXLA, DXLZ. OXLZA, 50XL, 5DXLA, ZXLA. 75. STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS' METAL PANS (NOT SHOWN (OPTIONAL) CHANNEL -SHAPED METAL PANS IN VARIOUS COLORS AND FI SHES, INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO CROSS TES OR MAIN RUNNERS AND SPACED 4 OR 6 IN. O.C. THE FLANGE EDGES OF THE METAL PANS ENGAGE AND INTERLOCK WITH THE VERTICAL TABS OF THE CORRESPONDING GRID ADAPTER5 WITH TABS 4 OR 6 IN. O.C. TSEE ITEM 7B). END LAPS JOINTS OF THE METAL PANS SHALL OCCUR ADJACENT TO MAIN RUNNERS OR CRO55 TES. THE METAL PANS SHALL EACH BE SUPPORTED BY AT LEAST TWO MAIN RUNNERS OR CROSS TEES. CHICAGO METALLIC CORP TYPE 1650. 7C. STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS" GRID ADAPTERSMSHOWN)((OPTIONAL FOR USE �METAL IETE7A). ANGLE SHAPED WITH A LOOPED RETURLANGE, NSALLD PARALLEL TO CRO50 TES ORMAN RUNNERS BY ENGAGING RETURN FLANGE OF ADAPTER TO THE FLANGE OF THE CROSS TEE OR MAIN RUNNER. THE 48 OR 24 IN. LONG ADAPTERS ARE INTENDED FOR USE WITH CP056 TEES OR MAIN RUNNERS, RESPECTIVELY. CHICAGO METALLIC CORP TYPE 1650. 7D. STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS' FILLER STRIPS (NOT SHOWN) (OPTIONAL) FOR USE WITH TYPE 1650 METAL PANS, FILLER 5TRIP5 ARE 0.018 TO 0. 4 IN. THICK, STEEL OR ALUMINUM,13/32 OR 5/8 IN. DEEP BY 3/4 IN. WIDE. Y PLACED BETWEEN THE METAL PANS. CHICAGO METALLIC CORP TYPE 1650. 8. ACOUSTICAL MATERIALS' 24 BY 24 OR 48 IN. LAY -IN PANELS. BORDER PANELS SUPPORTED BY MIN 0.016 IN. THICK (26 GAUGE) PAINTED STEEL ANGLE -(L WITH 1 IN. LEGS; OR, MIN 0.016 IN. THICK (26 GAUGE) PAINTED STEEL CHANNEL, 1-5/5 IN. DEEP WITH 1 IN. BOTTOM FLANGE AND 314 IN. TOP FLANGE. S=SURFACE PERFORATIONS). ARM5TRO G WORLD INDUSTRIES INC TYPES 5/6 IN. P (5) 24 X 24 OR 46 IN., OR 5/8 IN. PC (5) 24 X 46 IN. 9. HOLD-DONN CLIPS (NOT SHOWN) 1/2 IN. WIDE, 0.021 IN. THICK SPRING STEEL TWO C PS RACED OVER CRL65 TES 12 IN. FROM EACH MAIN TEE. n1 HOUR ROOFICEILING ASSEMBLY L SCALE: 1-1 211 = 1'-0" ICC S REPORTS SR-1153 4.17.2 ASSEMBLY 5:1 HOUR RATED PVC 51NGLE-PLY ROOF MEMBRANE 5/8" TH. DENS -DECK OVER 5/8" ADVANTEC FLOOR SHEATHING POLY150CYANUPATE INSULATION BOARDS. PROVIDE AVE. R-38 PER VT ENERGY CODE 4 SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM MAY OCCUR, SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS. ( NOT INCLUDED IN REQUIRED FIRE RATING ) 1. THE FLOORING MUST CONSIST OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 48/24 5PAN-RATED, TONGUE -AND -GROOVE, SHEATHING (EXPOSURE 1). CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE CONFORMING TO ASTM D 3498 MUST BE APPLIED TO THE TOP OF THE JOISTS PRIOR TO PLACING SHEATHING. WHEN USED AS A ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE DECKING 16 PERMITTED TO BE ANY WOOD DECK RECOGNIZED IN THE CODE. ALL BUTT JOINTS OF THE SHEATHING MUST BE LOCATED OVER FRAMING MEMBERS. 2. TJI J015T5 MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REPORT, WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 24 INCHES (610 MM) ON CENTER FOR FLOOR -CEILING ASSEMBLIES. WHEN USED IN ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLIES, THE J015TS ARE PERMITTED TO BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES (1219 MM) ON CENTER. 3. OPTIONAL MINIMUM 31/2-INCH-THICK (89 MM) GLA55 FIBER INSULATION OR GLASS FIBER INSULATION RATED R-30 0 LESS MAY BE INSTALLED IN THE JOIST PLENUM WHEN RESILIENT CHANNELS ARE USED. THE INSULATION MUST BE PLACED ABOVE THE RESILIENT CHANNELS BETWEEN THE J015T BOTTOM FLANGES. (4(. THE CEILING MEMBRANE MUST CONSIST OF TWO LAYERS OF 1/2-INCH-THICK CiYPSUM'BOARD TYPE COMPLYIING WITH ASTMOR TWO LAYERS OF 5/8-INCH-THICK I36 ATTACHE0TTO THETJIIJJOIST BOTTOM FLANGE. 5. THE FIRST LAYER OF GYPSUM BOARD MUST BE INSTA(LLED 41 PERPENDICULAR TO THE TYPE 6 SCREWJI JOISTS AND S SPACED 12 INCHES (E305 M) ON D USING 1 CENTERR. T}iNE SECONO�LAYE MUST BE INSTALLED WITH THE JOINTS $TAGGE2ED FROM THE FIRST LAYER. THE SECOND LAYER MUST 13E TYPE 5 SCREWS PACEDE2 INC E5D TO THE T8051MM) ON CENSTS WITH TER IN THE FSELDM,4NO 8 INCHES (20.3 MM) ON CENTER AT((TH� BUTT JOINTS. TYPE G E EW5.11/TER AND 6 INCHES (W(152 M LONG,MUSTFROM EACH 3E SPACED & INCHETRAN2O E JOINTS OF THE SECOND LAYER. THE SECOND LAYER MUST BE FINISHED WITH JOINT TAPE AND COMPOUND. TYPE ) O ��,11/2 CENTER AND 6 C C E�3( MM) LO , MMUST 13 SCDE OF T8 INCHES �E JOINTS OF THE SECOND LAYER. THE SECOND LAYER MUST BE FINISHED WITH JOINT TAPE AND COMPOUND. 7. IN ROOF -CEILING AC75EMBLIS IN WHICH THE TJI JOISTS ARE SPACED MORE THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) ON CENTER, THE CEILING, INCLUDING THE RESILIENT CHANNELS, MUST BE APPLIED TO STRIPPING SPACED 24 INCHES 1610 MM) ON CENTER. THE ATTACHMENT OF THE CEILING MEMBRANE TO THE STRIPPING MEMBERS MUST BE SIMILAR TO THE ATTACHMENT OF THE CEILING MEMBRANE TO THE TJI JOISTS. THE STRIPPING MUST BE A MINIMUM OF NOMINAL 2-5Y-4 CONSTRUCTION- GRADE DOUGLAS FIR LUMBER FOR SPANS UP TO 5 FEET (1524 MM)), AND MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE JOIST BOTTOM FLANGE USING A MINIMUM OF 1W010D BOX NAIL5.5TRIPPING MATERIALS OF EQUIVALENT STRENGTH AND ATTACHMENT ARE PERMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL 2 2 HOUR ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLY ScALE: 1-1 2 = 1 0 ICC S REPORTS FOR-11M 4.18 ASSEMBLY G: 2 HOUR RATED PVC SINGLE -PLY ROOF MEMBRANE - 5/8" TH. DENS -DECK OVER 5/8" ADVANTEC FLOOR SHEATHING POLYISOCYANURATE INSULATION BOARDS. PROVIDE AVE. R-35 PER VT ENERGY CODE ------------ 4 SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM MAY OCCUR, SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS. ( NOT INCLUDED IN REQUIRED FIRE RATING ) 1. THE FLOORING MUST CON515T OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 48/24 SPAN -RATED, TONGUE -AND -GROOVE, SHEATHING (EXP05URE 1). CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE CONFORMING TO ASTM 0 3498 MUST BE APPLIEb TO THE TOP OF THE JOISTS PRIOR TO PLACING SHEATHING. WHEN USED AS A ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE DECKING IS PERMITTED TO BE ANY WOOD DECK RECOGNIZED IN THE CODE. ALL BUTT JOINTS OF THE SHEATHING MUST BE LOCATED OVER FRAMING MEMBERS. 2. TJI JOISTS MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REPORT, WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 24 INCHES (610 MM) ON CENTER. MINIMUM TJI JOIST DEPTH 16 91/4 INCHES. 3. OPTIONAL) WHEN INSULATION 15 USED, IT MUST CONSIST OF GLASS -FIBER INS LATION WITH UNFACED BATTS THAT ARE 24 INCHES WIDE BY 48 INCHES LONG BY 31/2 INCHES THICK. THE INSULATION MUST BE PLACED IN THE PLENUM AND SUPPORTED BY STAY WIRES SPACED AT 12 INCHES ALONG THE J015T BOTTOM FLANGE. �! SPRAY FOAM FASTEN 0 12" O.C. � INSULATION EQUIPMENT CURB BONDING ADHESIVE AND SINGLE -PLY MEMBRANE FLASHING _HOT AIR WELD ®TYP. PIPE BOOT DETAIL SLISLF3� COMPLETELY TO SHED WATER AL DAM - SECURE TO ROOF IC®all O.C. HOT AIR WELD �DETTA4IL @ PIPE PENETRATION 111 �I PIPE BOOT VENT THROUGH ROOF I CONT. CANT STRIP ROOF MEMBRANE TYP DETAIL @ EQUIPMENT CURB ALTERNATE PIPE BOOT DETAIL REFERENCE NOTES 1. FIT INSULATION TIGHTLY BETWEEN STUDS AND SECURELY 5. VERIFY USE OF WALL HEAD COMPENSATING TRACK AT NON- 9. VERIFY FIRE RATINGS FOR ALL RATED WALLS, AND FASTEN TO STUDS. BEARING WALL5 WITH ENGINEER. PRODUCTS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE. 2. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS FOR ASSEMBLIES NOT INDICATED 6. STC AND IIC RATINGS INDICATED ARE MINIMUMS TO BE 10. STUD 61ZEO & SHEATHING NOTED FOR GENERAL HERE. PROVIDED. REQUIREMENTS ONLY. ALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STUD 51ZE5 & SHEATHING TO BE 3. PROVIDE LEVEL 5 FINISH ON ALL GYP. BD. PARTITIONS IN 7. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR TYPE & LOCATION OF BASE DESIGNED BY REGISTERED ENGINEER. LOBBY. AND FINISH FLOOR. 4. GYPSUM BOARD TO BE MOISTURE & MOLD RE515TANT TYPE 8. USE PRESSURE TREATED WOOD FOR BOT RATES ON IN BATHROOMS AND POOL AREA. GROUND FLOOR. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION a 0 L 8 Y F� SHEET NUMBER A710 DA FF. 09/14/2016 it n� • V �2 SCALE: 1-1 2HOUR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY 1 AUGUST 28, 2013 RESTRAINED A55EM51LY RATINGS 3/4,1,1-1/2, 2 OR 3 HR (SEE ITEMS 1, 6 AND 10) UNRESTRAINED A65EM15LY RATING 0 HR (SEE ITEMS 3, 4, 4A AND 10) UNRESTRAINED BEAM RATINGS 1,1-1/2, 2, 3 AND 4 HR (SEE ITEMS 4, 4A AND 10) RESTRICTED LOAD CONDITION SEE SUPPORTS AND ITEM 4C SUPPORTS W8X2802X16 OR ALTERNATE ((ER SECTION IV.6 IN THE FRONT OF THE FIRE RE515TANCE DIRECTORY) STEEL BEAM OR b11N SKI STEEL JOISTS WHEN JOIST SUBSTITUTION APPLIED. 1. NORMAL WEIGHT OR LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE CARBONATE OR SILICEOUS AGGREGATE, 3500 P61 COMPRESSIVE 5TRENG71H, VIBRATED. LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE, EXPANDED SHALE, OR SLATE AGGREGATE BY ROTARY -KILN METHOD, OR EXPANDED CLAY AGGREGATE BY ROTARY -KILN OR SINTERED-GRATE METHOD, 3000 P51 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, VIBRATED, 4 TO 7 PERCENT ENTRAINED AIR. 9TRA5' CONCRETE CEIIT WGHTP CONCRETE HNS I.A 1 NORMAL WEIGHT 147-163 3-1/2 1-1/2 NORMAL WEIGHT 147-153 4 2 NORMAL WEIGHT 147-153 4-1/2 3 NORMAL WEIGHT 147-153 5-1/4 3/4 OR 1 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-113 2-1/2 1 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-120 2-5/8 1-1/2 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-113 3 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-113 2 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-110 LIGHTWEIGHT 1 -1 0 N4_3/10 LI HTWEI H 1 -11 LIGHTWEIGHT 107-120 "FOR USE WITH 2 OR 3 IN. STEEL FLOOR AND FORM UNITS ONLY. 2. WELDED WIRE FABRIC 6 X 0,10 X 10 SWG. 3. STEEL FLOOR AND FORM UNITS" COMP051TE 1-1/2,1-5/6, 2 OR 3 IN. DEEP GALV UNITS OR 4-1/2 IN. DEEP NONCOMPOBITE GALV UNITS. FLUTED UNITS MAY BE UNCOATED OR PH05PHATIZED/PAINTED. MIN GAUGES ARE 22 MSG FOR FLUTED AND 20/20 MSG FOR CELLULAR UNITS. THE FOLLOWING COMBINATIONS OF UNITS MAY BE USED: (1) ALL 18, 24, 26 28 OR 36 IN. WIDE CELLULAR. (2) ALL FLUTED. T3) ONE OR TWO 3 IN. DEEP, 12 IN. WIDE,18/18 MSG MIN CELLULAR UNITS, AALTERNATING WITH 3 IN. DEEP FLUTED OR OTHER CELLULAR. (4) ANY BLEND OF FLUTED AND 18, 24, 26, 28, OR 36 IN. WIDE CELLULAR. (51 3 1N. DEEP, 30 IN. WIDE CELLULAR WITH 8-116 1N. WIDE VALLEY ALONGSIDE JOINTS MAY BE USED WHEN 5/8 IN. DIAM REINFORCING BARS ARE PLACED 1-1/2 IN. TO EACH 51DE OF SIDE JOINTS AND 1 IN. ABOVE BOTTOM OF UNITS. (6) CORRUGATED, 1-5/16 IN. DEEP, 30 IN. WIDE, 24 MSG MIN GALV UNITS WITH SHEAR WIRES FACTORY WELDED TO DECK CORRUGATIONS. WELDED TO SUPPORTS 12 IN. OC. THROUGH WELDING WASHERS. FOR SHEAR WIRE SPACING OF 8 IN. OR LESS THE STEEL DECK STRESS SHALL NOT EXCEED 20 K5I. FOR SHEAR WIRE SPACING GRATER THAN 8 IN. CC. BUT LE55 THAN OR EQUAL TO 12 IN. OC. STEEL DECK STRESS SHALL NOT EXCEED 12 K51. AEC STEEL DECK, DIV OF ASC PROFILES L L C 24, 30, OR 36 IN. WIDE, TYPES 5 HI -FORM, BF HI -FORM, N HI -FORM, NF HI -FORM, 2W HI -FORM, 2WF HI -FORM, 3W HI -FORM, 3WF HI -FORM, BR HI -FORM, BMOD HI -FORM, BRMOD HI -FORM, DGB HI -FORM, DGBF HI -FORM, DGN HI -FORM, OGN32 HI -FORM, DGNF HI -FORM, DGNF32 HI -FORM, DG2W HI -FORM, DG2WF HI -FORM, D03W HI -FORM, AND P63WF HI -FORM; 32 IN. WIDE TYPE N-32, NF32, DGN32, DGNF32, 24 OR 30 IN. WIDE TYPES A5C2 OR A50. ALL UNITS MAY BE GALVANIZED OR PRIME SHIELD. - CANAM STEEL CORP 36 IN. WIDE TYPE P-3623, P-3606, P-3615 AND 24 IN WIDE TYPE P-2432 COMPOSITE. CANAM STEEL CORP 24 IN. WIDE, TYPES 1-1/2, 2 OR 3 IN. LOK-FLOOR AND LOK-FLOOR CELL; 36 IN. WOE, TYPES 2 OR 3 IN. LOK-FLOOR AND LOK-FLOOR CELLS; 24 IN. WIDE, TYPES N-LOK AND N-OK CELL; 24. 30 OR 36 IN. WIDE, TYPE 1-1/2 IN. B-LOK AND B-LOK CELL. CONSOLIDATED SYSTEMS ING 24 IN. WIDE TYPES CFD-2, CFD-3; 24,30 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPE CFD-1.5; 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPES MAC-LOK 2, MAC-LOK 3; 24 IN. WIDE, TYPES 82C, B2FC, NC, NFC; 30 IN. WIDE TYPE 53C, 12 IN. WIDE MAC -WAY CELLULAR 45 MOW, 2-633 MTWA, 3-633 MPWA, 3-633 MI 3-633 M1WV+, 24 IN. WIDE TYPE VERSA-DEK. DECK WEST INC 36 IN. WIDE TYPE B-OW, 2-OW OR 3-OW. SIDE JOINTS OF 2-DWI AND 3-DW MAY BE FASTENED TOGETHER WITH MIN 1 IN. LONG NO. 12 X 14 SELF -DRILLING, SELF -TAPPING STEEL SCREW 36 IN. OC. DESIGN ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS INC 35 IN. WIDE TYPE DAC5I.5CO, OR 24 IN. WIDE TYPE DAC62.0CD, OR DAC53.0CD. EPIC METAL-5 CORP 24 IN. WIDE TYPES EC150, ECP150, EC300, ECP300, EC366, ECP366, EC150, EC300 INVERTED, EPICORE A; 30 IN. WIDE TYPES ECB150, EC5R150; 36 IN. WIDE TYPES EC266. H H P05ERT50N QL TYPES, 24 IN. WIDE 3 OR 3 INVERTED UKX UKX-3, 2 IN. 99, AKX, 21 OR 21 INVERTED,121, NKX, TKX; 24 OR 30 IN. WIDE 6KX, 6KX-A; 36 IN. WIDE 99, AKX, WKX; 24 26, 94, 36 IN. WIDE NKX,1.5NKC, NKC, AKX, 2 OR 3 IN, TKC;12 IN. WIDE NONCOMPOSITE SEC. 12;17 IN. WIDE 21; 26 OR 28 IN. WIDE UKX, 87.5 CM WDE. SIDE JOINTS OF CIL, 99,121, WKX, TKX TKC, AND METRIC UNITS QL-77-900; QLC-78-900, MAY BE WELDED TOGETHER 66 IN. OC. SIDE JOINTS OF 99, AKX, WKX, GKX, GKX-A, TKX AND METRIC UNITS QL-77-900 AND OLC-78-90G MAY BE FASTENED TOGETHER WITH MIN 1 IN. LONG NO.12X14 SELF -DRILLING, SELF -TAPPING STEEL SCREWS 36 IN. OC. REFERENCE NOTES 1. FIT INSULATION TIGHTLY BETWEEN 5TUD5 AND SECURELY FASTEN TO STUDS. 2. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS FOR ASSEMBLIES NOT INDICATED HERE. 3. PROVIDE LEVEL 5 FINISH ON ALL GYP. BD. PARTITION5 IN LOBBY. 4. GYPSUM BOARD TO BE M016TUPE & MOLD RESISTANT TYPE IN BATHROOMS AND POOL AREA. HAMBRO STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, DIV OF CANAM STEEL COPP 36 IN. WIDE, 1-1/2 IN. TYPE P3615H5. THE MAX SUPERIMPOSED LOADINGS FOR TYPE P3615H8 UNITS SHALL NOT EXCEED 250 PEE FOR SINGLE SPANS, THE USE OF THE UNITS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 5 FT. 6 IN., Co FT 0 IN. AND 6 FT 6 IN. MAX SPANS FOR THE 2-2, 20 AND 18 GAUGE UNITS, RESPECTIVELY. FOR MULTIPLE SPANS, 16 GAUGE UNITS MAY BE USED ON A MAX 7 FT 6 IN. SPAN WITH A MAX TOTAL SUPERIMPOSED LOADING OF 240 PBF. KAM INDUSTRIES LTD, PDA CORDECK 24 IN. WIDE TYPES 2 OR 3 IN. WDR. MARLYN STEEL DECKS INC TYPE 1.5 CF. 2.0 CF OR 3.0 CF. NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS L L C TYPE 1.5CD,1.5CDI,1.5CDR, 2.00D OR 3.000. UNITS MAY BE PH05/PAINTED OR GALVANIZED. VALLEY JOIST 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPES WVC 1-1/2 OR WVC 2. VERCO DECKING INC - A NUCOR CO 24, 30 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPES PLB, PLBCD, B BCD. BR; 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPES PLW2, PLW2CD, W2, W2CD, PLW3, FLW3CD, W3, W3 D; 24 IN. WIDE TYPES PLN, PLNCD, N, NCO. 12 IN. WIDE PLW2, W2, PLW3 OR W3 UNITS MAY BE BLENDED WITH 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE FLW2, W2, FLW3 OR W3 UNITS, RESPECTIVELY. FLUTED UNITS MAY BE PHOS/PTD. VULCRAFT, DIV OF NUCOR COPP 24.30 OR 36 IN. WIDE, TYPE 1.5 AL. 1.5 VLI, 1.5 VLP; 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE. TYPES 2VLI, 2VLP, 3VLI, 3 VLF. COMPONENTS FOR FIELD-A55EMBLED CELLULAR METAL RACEWAY UNITS: RACEWAY BOTTOM 24 OR 36 IN. WIDE TYPES 212 V5, 312 VS. RACEWAY COVER PLATE TYPES CP-12, CP-16. RACEWAY DIVIDER TYPE DC-20, DC-26. RACWAY ISOLATION TROUGH TYPES T20, T-25, T-30. SPACING OF WELDS ATTACHING UNITS TO 5UPPORT5 SHALL BE 12 IN. OC FOR 12.24 AND 36 IN. WIDE UNITS, FOUR WEL05 PER SHEET FOR 30 IN. WIDE UNITS, 6 IN. OC FOR 18 IN. WIDE AND SEC. 12 UNITS. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ADJACENT UNITS BUTTON -PUNCHED OR WELDED TOGETHER 36 IN. OC ALONGSIDE JOINTS. ADJACENT 18 IN. WIDE UNITS WELDED TOGETHER 30 IN. OC ALONGSIDE JOINTS. FOR 3 HR RATING, UNITS WITH OVERLAPPING TYPE SIDE JOINTS WELDED TOGETHER 24 IN. OC MAX. 4. SPRAY -APPLIED FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIALS - NOTE: SPRAY -APPLIED FIRE RESISTIVE MATERIALS MUST 5E APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL DF91GN NO. 0925. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF MATERIAL AND METHOD PRIOR TO APPLICATION. 5. 5HEAR-CONNECTOR-5TUD5-OPTIONAL STUDS 3/4 IN. DIAM BY 3 IN. LONG, FOR 1-1/2 IN. DEEP FORM UNITS TO 5-1/4 IN. LONG FOR 3 IN. DEEP FORM UNITS, HEADED TYPE OR EQUIVALENT PER ALEC SPECIFICATIONS. WELDED TO THE TOP FLANGE OF THE BEAM THROUGH THE STEEL FORM UNITS. 6. ELECTRICAL INSERTS (NOT SHOWN) CLASSIFIED AS "OUTLET BOXES AND FITTINGS CLASSIFIED FOR FIRE RESISTANCE". H H ROBERTOON PRE5ETINSERTS. FOR USE WITH 2-1/2 IN. LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE TOPPING OVER QL-WKX STEEL FLOOR UNITS. INSTALLED OVER FACTORY -PUNCHED HOLES IN FLOOR UNITS PER ACCOMPANYING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. SPACING SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN ONE INSERT IN EACH 14 SQ FT OF FLOOR AREA WITH SPACING ALONG FLOOR UNITS NOT LE55 THAN 48 IN. OC. THE HOLES CUT IN INSERT COVER FOR PA55AGE OF WIRES SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1/8 IN. LARGER DIAM THAN WIRE. RESTRAINED ASSEMBLY RATING 15 3/4 HR WITH TAPMATE II-F6-1 AND 1 HR WITH TAPMATE II-FS-2 INSERTS. H H R013ERT50N TAPMATE II-FIB-1, II-F5-2, SERIES KEE. WIREMOLD CO AFTER SET INSERTS. SINGLE -SERVICE AFTER SET INSERTS INSTALLED PER ACCOMPANYING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS IN 2-1/2 IN. DIAM HOLE CORE -DRILLED THROUGH MIN 3-1/4 IN. THICK CONCRETE TOPPING TO TOP OF CELL OF ANY MIN 3 IN. DEEP CELLULAR STEEL FLOOR UNIT SPECIFIED UNDER ITEM 3. SPACING SHALL BE NO MORE THAN ONE INSERT IN EACH 10 5Q FT OF FLOOR AREA IN EACH SPAN WITH A MIN CENTER TO CENTER SPACING OF 16 IN. IF THE HIGH POTENTIAL AND LOW POTENTIAL RACEWAYS OF THE CELLULAR STEEL FLOOR UNIT ARE SEPARATED BY A VALLEY FILLED WITH CONCRETE, THE CENTER TO CENTER SPACING OF THE HIGH POTENTIAL AND LOW POTENTIAL SINGLE-5EFACE AFTER SET INSERTS MAY BE REDUCED TO A MIN OF 7-1/2 IN. RESTRAINED A55EMDLY RATING 15 2 HR OR LE55 WITH INTERNALLY PROTECTED TYPE 436 AFTER SET INSERT WITH TYPE M4-, M6- OR M8- SERIES SINGLE -SERVICE ACTIVATION FITTING. WIREMOLD CO INTERNALLY PROTECTED TYPE 436 AFTER SET INSERT WITH TYPE M4-, M6- OR M8- SERIES 91NGLE-5ERVICE ACTIVATION FITTING. "BARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARK 5. VERIFY USE OF WALL HEAD COMPENSATING TRACK AT NON - BEARING WALLS WITH ENGINEER. 6. OTC AND TIC RATINGS INDICATED ARE MINIMUMS TO BE PROVIDED. 7. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR TYPE & LOCATION OF BASE AND FINISH FLOOR. 8. USE PRESSURE TREATED WOOD FOR BOT PLATES ON GROUND FLOOR. n1 HOUR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY L SCALE: 11 2 = 1-0" ICC E5 REPORTS ESR-1153 4.17.2 ASSEMBLY 5: 1 HOUR RATED /OOR SHEATHING FL r r • • r r • � r 1. THE FLOORING MUST CONSIST OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 48/24 SPAN -RATED, TONGUE -AND -GROOVE, SHEATHING (EXPOSURE 1). CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE CONFORMING TO ASTM 1) 3498 MUST BE APPLIED TO THE TOP OF THE JOISTS PRIOR TO PLACING SHEATHING. WHEN USED AS A ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE DECKING 15 ERMITTED TO BE ANY WOOD DECK RECOGNIZED IN THE CODE. ALL BUTT JOINTS OF THE SHEATHING MUST BE LOCATED OVER FRAMING MEMBERS. 2. TJI JOISTS MUST BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REPORT, WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 24 INCHES (610 MM) ON CENTER FOR FLOOR -CEILING ASSEMBLIES. WHEN USED IN ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLIES, THE JOISTS ARE PERMITTED TO BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 46 INCHES (1219 MM) ON CENTER. 3. OPTIONAL MINIMUM 31/2-INCH-THICK T9 MM) GLA55 FIBER INSULATION OR G AS5 FIBER INSULATION RATED R-30 0 LE55 MAY BE INSTALLED IN THE JOIST PLENUM WHEN RESILIENT CHANNELS ARE USED. THE INSULATION MUST BE PLACED ABOVE THE RESILIENT CHANNELS BETWEEN THE J015T BOTTOM FLANGES (4. THE CEILING MEMBRANE MUST CONSIST OF TWO LAYERS OF 1/2-INCH-THICK CiYP5UM 60ARD TYPE COM LY COMPLYING WITH O LAYERSA5TM C 136, ATTACHED TO THE TYPE X TJI J015T BOTTOM FLANGE. 5. THE FIRST LAYER OF GYPSUM BOARD MUST BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO THE TJI J015715 AND ATTAC5PACEP 12 HED USING ))1 5/5-INCH-LONG f41 MMON CENTER. THE ECON0), TYPE 5 INS TALLED ED WITH THE JOIN 5 S3 AGGERED FROM THE FIRST LAYER.5T5 WITH 2-INCH-LONG THE SECOND LAYERMUCITDLAYER MUST 13E FASTENED TO THE S TYPE 5 SCREWS SPACED 2 INCHESTS051MM) ON CENTER IN THE F5E I) � ND 8 INCHES (203 MM) ON CENTER AT(THE BUTMIA)TJ61NT5. 03 MM) ON CENTER AND 6 INCHE$3! 52 MM)) PROM EACH 5 DEMUST 13E SPACED THE INCHESTRAN5VE2R E JOINTS OF THE SECOND LAYER. THE 6ECOND LAYER MUST BE FINISHED WITH JOINT TAPE AND COMT CHANNELSPOUND. 6. (O(F THE (C)E)ILING ATTACH MERNTI�YST4 INCHES (EM, PROVIDED THEYAPE ARE PD TO BACED 16 INCHESE USED AS PART i HE f406 MM) ON ON CENTER NDPASI ON CENTER IF THE NED PERENDICULARISTS ARE TO THE TJ�PACED JOISTS U51 1-INCH-LONG�25.4 MM), TYPE 5 SCREWS. WHEN RESILIENT CHANNELS ARE USED, THE MET LAYER OF THE CEILING MEMBRANE MUST BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO THE CHANNELS AND ATTACHED TO THE RESILIENT (C(HANNEL�S USING 1-INCH-LONGON CENTER. THE 5ECO(25.4 MNO LAYME)RTYPE S 5CREW5 PACED 12 INCHES RAGG05 ERED FROM THE FIRST LAYERND ATTACHED MUST U5 NG 15/8 CH-LONGE INSTALLED WITH THE ( 45 MM), TYPE S SCREWS. THE SCREW SPACING FOR THE SECOND LAYER OF GYP�UM 50, RE) MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 12 INCHES 305 MM ON CENTER IN THE FIELD AND 8 INCHES (203 MM) ON CENTER AT TH� BUTT J�INTE. TYPE G MM) ON CENTER,11/2 INCHESAND 6 INC E$�( 62MMM)OFROM EACH 51DE OF THEMUST 5E SPACED 8 NCHES TRA SVERSE JOINTS OF THE SECOND LAYER. THE SECOND LAYER MUST BE FINISHED WITH JOINT TAPE AND COMPOUND. 9. VERIFY FIRE RATINGS FOR ALL RATED WALLS, AND PRODUCTS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE. 10. STUD SIZES & SHEATHING NOTED FOR GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ONLY. ALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STUD SIZES & SHEATHING TO BE DESIGNED BY REGISTERED ENGINEER. n2 HOUR FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY SCALE: 1-1 2' = 1 0 ICC E6 REPORTS E6R-1153 4.18 ASSEMBLY G: 2 HOUR RATED u \ u \ FLOOR SHEATHINGTEC r� rr • REFLECTEDSEE CEILING PLAN FOR• '• NOT r r IN REQUIRED FIRE RATING ) 1. THE FLOORING MUST CONSIST OF A SINGLE LAYER OF 48/24 SPAN -RATED, TONGUE -AND -GROOVE, SHEATHING EXPOSURE 1)). CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE CONFORMING TO ASTM 1) 3498 MU , BE APPLIEb TO THE TOP OF THE JOISTS PRIOR TO PLACING SHEATHING. WHEN USED AS A ROOF -CEILING ASSEMBLY, THE DECKING 16 PERMITTED TO BE ANY WOOD DECK RECOGNIZED IN THE CODE. ALL BUTT JOINTS OF THE SHEATHING MUST BE LOCATED OVER FRAMING MEMBERS. 2. TJI J015TS MUST 5E INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS REPORT, WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 24 INCHES (610 MM) ON CENTER. MINIMUM TJI J015T DEPTH IS 91/4INCHES. 3. OPTIONAL WHEN INSULATION IS USED, IT MUST CONSIST OF GLA55-FIBER INS LATION ITH UNFACED BATT5 THAT ARE 24 INCHES WIDE BY 48 INCHES LONG BY 31/2 INCHES THICK. THE INSULATION MUST BE PLACED IN THE PLENUM AND SUPPORTED BY STAY WIRES SPACED AT 12 INCHES ALONG THE JOIST BOTTOM FLANGE. 45T OF THREE LAYERS OF 5/8-INCH-THICK SUM BOARD. THE BASE LAYER MUST BE i WITH END JOINTS STAGGERED, AND OTTOM FLANGE USING 1 5/8 INCH LONG, CENTER ALONG EACH JOIST. RESILIENT 3T BE APPLIED UNDER THE FIRST LAYER THE JOISTS AND 5PACED A MAXIMUM OF MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE BOTTOM WITH 15/5 INCH LONG TYPE S SCREWS. LAYER OF GYPSUM BOARD MUST BE TAPE, AND EXPOSED SCREW HEADS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ln W J mLu U � W Q z Ln Ln LD Q Lu z Zm x z o O J O SHEET NUMBER A711 DATE: 09/14/2016 it IC Ir 3D View 1 1 n 3D View 2 �M View 3 m"Joilloollamill WIN No I 4 3D View 4 11 It II NII�II 1 it II � � " 11 i 11 II r:�? ii I I �ir..,. 'I "Joll/III:�NI ��L��I _In• " �'l 5 3D View 5 4 3D View 6 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 z z 0 L. z R e g�� Q F-1cc PROJECTM 1504 SHEET NUMBER A901 n c r.n .. ti - s, Fayette Road o I II / .� TFrr[ROAn GMDF TREE uvo6>J.. __ O -µx-swa_1_ru �. I r®e6w»ucNr6aem. \ � P 1 I —4rILL I o � To a- -_ - GONcu2c _ uNrt s.ofcwuL _ o nv a mP i ff e. 2m �w mcA�eol I oln000R DfRNGAIIFA - ',.f/ CONC0.ETE PA RASA co s1lik �f 117�I1QJ I t K6 LOOPS U BFNOI � y • ' fFAN100 I j IIoi` I Forking r It 502 3 1 ! r PAC TOTAL 00 PINE 3Q11�14751 T, } y � Ili: PINE � 241111111 x PINE � w , ?00 1 � _ I--------------- i �m M-1 011111111l7,■ L— — I�moL &1FF60. PUNnrvG TN Low sur.Tounwr nANls � ArnoN <ONC6FSE SIOEWMI6 COLLEROR MH) —mP2cRFn:tDLw� —NEW GIAti &I65l1FETFA NIGN UA-- CONC0.ETELD6WALK \ 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE T 802.864.0— F602.664.6267 ha66.on — LARKIN TERRACE LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN REVISIONS — •"^••••••••• DRAWING NO. JOBNO. 638 SCAU 1•=20.-0. L 1.0 DATE 10.13.16 TREE PROTECTION >' \ NOTES \ I. Ppfwae nwame. me mxmw rw fem pp. ,wlman.ndl — .fw..,l. F z mquae m.noat .a.d„a a aaa vaaa+la mmm.Man fna+�a. me m. mwmmn +.f b aubamdMpwa.1 \ 3. Cwln yed1 vas+aFanvm arm ma \ In etlwr by lawdww will b Mfanddtl by ab Owrr me \ ds AlNlab. mtl nrxM wM,W UP LmdMd tl,ua w wW ra,t N Aim mee a y5,000 faa v'aa D.s�a m d adr eras m M PwfsaY a,i b ae+s,M \ s U,e nee d3300 P✓MM Mpm dAava \ \ 1. AAud SI,000 mYblaaMtl aWwa tlwC trxrarM �-'(. \ w111nakmadmmm,elon lmlM vs wovaMm+aa ��\ S. Dmnyv m vas. ,Imb. and aaw ngeeWm wlll b 11 .v...a q aw aaara.a Dwmm m .®M.�w wu d. x....dwd Sotlq dAno,ws,. �S4I Ddae ;i' \ d. aaaa WWIF a,oa.a wa Nors dw ow.w. � \ i � � \ amMmry m ,dfa+me +bova b • � Fmlae a bo a...w,wb ®e'.we d ds �- F a dmwFedm Mvae ` I ). Hmry vasty N,W dWpmdmbwtlan tlbnsI W ,apYrrnmt +.agW,µ a nmhr W im+s \< _� n.m w wmb a dl. mm..a.w +fmm.d N' aw own. and Awxlsµ .xd b x.n dwa _ - �ol+n,ad rtweanm.aw. ih.and nd, elm.rma c6 b tank M1r M m w eamfl. MM wmn Mlle w cwuaam, k cwn wxn n+onww dam A axe \ -- own..Arddraaw wwkx�m wraayc •. � \�\ ._. a Tb cnlma®re m.�dw:dl.amwrawvm ea' � \i 3 aonmuabn opanvan mua b pmlamM In and • / " �.. \ '., TW s. Dmwmea ..., d was memm,n, me waennwm+w. '_ - \" ''��EE�T1ON la. array m.w W arnn x�w n m. nee ana maws � � - \ AMk.c m . IoM ,maws d alvY� xav bbn � � �.. .... -� , \ als,lry ep,mbm xwe mmn�mwd L mk d dviry x � ��� ��—.."�_�.. flmm.ly MnadedwY dPtl ^E I II. Dd.mm,a a.el � (mes 1 f..a xida svr a y e `1 xerxa ar b e dam oFx+wd mr faaa.. all.m . I L1 IOfrmonw�imm �°wn' PmvaM1Yl b.F.md ' \ vmuv afm„aa,.. a.. FAmaMw �K Y.II b _. In+eew lna®nanw wkn a,. wlwai ` _ 12�—A- — lldw IS Vllsa ammavlon wR b F nsa P®^a9' m abYy I I ex. I e� Fmvlmlq ,M1dl b .. emmm n.a -- wwl. as wlm�vlwary.f mama a.ndl x.amxl __ fl L4Ma w Ivbmamd b--rft.kk FN+v ",wb .mxw.a - Ifl drN Fmla,nW W d.h b Men s °O°— xY Wgnpa Nair m Latin 02115, slevxe demxq. 19. Aram u ad�mMr nexmtl w,agwW by laM,wp ' bw. wnpwvy Paweabn dMcm and fslbs .. \ mwm Away aaw,. a d» wen uw b IvneaW anry +lsa M walk wxM mn inf.a w dmna vaw aM plwn I er. 14 -. tr +mncl.wa � j 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Iw N� Iyy/. l re I j - t> _ I -- --- -- -- —- ----------- oi I - "l._3 \` ti 4111. PINE -3P" PI ( PI ��Tar C I _r 0" PIN I Ia I I j 11 INE " PINE I I I iI PINE o / i j 200 PIPE BE REMOVED FOR DRAIN% FOR DRAPE ACCESS T( STORMWATER POND CID - I 1\lam�� �/� —r x. �b ----------------- x. r p A' I :• J Li � x. 6" map/e � eler. cult / v / t P / eK l fir\ " ,./ec. you/t ex tv. pad cedars \ Lex 6"maP/e wy�, \ ryy e +lknnod cc 10 1 !f 50263 �� I_ ne. cr �ex. 72' mop/e I r f I to//n d 1 K I'ciob j I C x.-4" rob x. 4"61 n�u If 502, 61 2 �r _x /� 15 ex 4' c Db EK/13"ASH _14 carraownpp (4) ,ufi ,zer„ \car q0/� {� .� l.. � .I ,� \ 41JQ r1 " . / c < l I r/4rr� _ PINES qq ` /� � 1 J � I r / � I � I I 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET / S i WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE a03.861.0010 F803.fl61.d R6) www.wo6na.hoaSaan..nm LARKIN TERRACE EXISTING TREE INVENTORY REVISIONS DRAWING No. IoR No 638 SCALE I" = 20'-0" DATE 10.13.16 L I I OPEN SPACE r PARKING LOT INDICATED WITH SHADING I I TOTAL AREA: 17,938 W 31,597 W (28.5% of 110,812 kg TOTAL AREA) \ PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE \ TOTAL AREA: 1901 k2 (10.6% of 17,938 W) pw \ \ ' I � t? EstIM2te of Probable Lardstape Value (Trees, and Shrubs) 1015/2016 ITEM Qlasn y Lh* Unit Cad UNt Tod W,.ftw PLANTING :. . Syringe ,or-Il a'" Silk 2.5'-3' CaL 4 EA $500.00 $3,000.00 Gleeinia viarantlm Soaet Krpar - HONEr LOCIhT s-S.S• 14 EA $1400A0 $33A00.00 Gltdiah oftandsas'Wude nastee - HONEY LOCUST S•-SS• 7 EA $2.40040 616AM-00 Ater x FreosWl'Armstrond - FREEMAN MAPLE 3.3S' Cel, 7 EA $650.00 KSSm - Aes, x Freeanii'Celebrei re- CELEBRATION MAPLE 3.35• Cal. S EA $650.00 $3,2XW --. UYnw Amxlana'Prince on' . PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 4•-/S Cal. 5 EA $1,600.00 86.000.00 BWA rdpe'Hadage. 4.5--S' Cal. 5 EA $1.500.00 67.5" 5 Gal Woes (Hyd inga4 Lb-) 13 EA $70,00 $910.00 3 Gal. Shrub (Ninebark, Reol, Sunset) 173 EA $0.00 $I 1,245.00 msoft SuMdel $111ML00 3%of$250,000 - $7,M 2% of $250,0110 SSA00 I%of $7.500.000 $75,000 MINIMUM TOTAL $67500 j --w - TOF N. � -� I (a (DM ems! t. - ex. P ed parking jJJJ(((i IL yj� //P J / lil sin Il K I,IW 15) ro l � �II I � ; • ` 'a\C Ifl ac ' (n � (1(4)5H j (rips + , (Rossi (7) filar (Act (d) ro J k (pro I I I I I �[ ff 602..61 1 'Iff 502. 6' N (3) Ht L. 1 maa I im)aF a I a9'I phut (2o) M II1NE pa PINE PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QTY. SOENTIFCNAME COMMON NAME S� SPAGNG DECIDUOUS TREES AA 1 7 1 Air x Frernans Arena rowif FREEMAN MAPLE 3'-35' AS SHOWN AC 5 Acr x FremaMi'Ceiebndan' 3'-35• CAL 3•-3-V CAL AS SHOWN BN 5 SWAA- nipe'Herltap' (Wl,gle solos) RPAR MACH 3'-3.V CAL AS SHOWN GS 14 Gkdah t iarantlw I— Keep✓ STREET KEEPER HONEY LOCUST 4'AS AS SHOWN GT 7 GMdWa vlrandwa'9odemuor' SHADEMASTER HONEY LOCUST 4'A V CAL AS SHOWN SR 4 SYr*W retltula m'hory S011 JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2.5' CAL AS SHOWN L3A 5 Uinw amerlas,a'Priosemn' PRINCETON AMENCAN ELM 3%3S• AS SHOWN SHRUBS HL 6 HIM11- ea Paskulaa'UaM Quids Fin' DWARF PANICLE HYDRANGEA INS 5' O.G PO 4B My..c p. apulihEw'Utd. DeNr NINEBARK N3 W O.G TT 27 Taxw x media Talsmmlu TAUNTON YEW IP-24• 4' O.G W 4 Syrfrp posh T9ol Kin' MISS KM KOREAN LILAC INS 5' O.C. RA 113 Rhtu Aromatw'Grs l DWARF FRAGRANT SUMAC N3 4' O.G ORNAMENTAL GRASSES DC R Dolclw„psh c weess, TUFTED HAIR GRASS 02 20' O.G MS 1 33 Mbas,dsua sir,enah'Grx111Ynw' El%AW1 n 30. O.G SH 1 124 1 Sporobolus heterokpds PRAIRE DROPSEED N2 N O.G PERENNIALS HH 343 Nemeroeallls Nappy Retunf DAYL LY NI NI IS• O.G RF 95 RWbedb 410da'Gdddormi BLMX-EYED AMN _ PLANTING NOTES ( I. All plant m rlal in the pint schedule shall be -,sr, grown In accordance (-] wkh ANSI In s<coMance with Z60.1 Standards for measurement of nursery ork 2 All pW shall be gwranteed by the Cmoactor fora period of one year from don of receipt of Prone ord Acceptance of the completed mstalladan by the - - 3. Replacement pl.d.p will be requ red prior to Fimsl Accep-. for any plains poie which are musing, not we w speoffi om have died or are unhmkhy or \ unchaacansoc of the sperm (due to escessree proMng, dieback or other �9 4. All pinam) maerials shall M nlecad aM ogled u the nursery by Landsape \ e e/ec. veu/t Arch sect \ S. The landscape Arthiteces approval is rsqu rtd for airy pint materhl _ substituua, 6. The Co.- is rnponalble for Immediately noWrg the Landscape Architect d any plant quwt ty disaapanc n cost between the planting pin and ma Ne plant the 7. All ahrves and tries w111 bs sprayed Ovid, the wtl deelcant -Wik-Pnrr (or (y approves egwl) prior to the flirt Winer I- is- thrt November 30). C8. The Wduapa Contractor shsA have the Gensrsl Corox o, loon all �� rgr undeound utllon M arras toso be hndpan ed prior w commer,elng y eso atlen Ad)wvnen. to tree I--. vell be .16wed where udliq o-91- era clearly a problem sM wid prior so, approval by Landscape (r1)M L.. Archnect gam, r`. ^�+r 9. All plain bed, shrub and trw Iaoaon shall be staked In de fled by Contractor for landscape Archit- approM prior to nstsiston 1 10. Adjust - w plant beds A.)l be approved by Landscape Archltect 11. G.-r.1 Contractor is responible for all eroswn control meuura during rotors All disturbed areas art w es topsoil" and seeded or sodded, u ndiaad in Me planting plan. 13. Mukh sh.11 consist of double shredded hardwood mukh or approved equal and Contractor is responi bls for providing samples of mulch to Landops Arthrcect Mukh plarrc materials u shown on pin arM d,:tvla �' 14. Its the M of daonaact cto avold sny duoesisd rbwce to ng ven or shrubs on its other dun dose apocfilly dnignated for transplam o owl. 15. Uquidted damages for tram damaged by c so-oco- opsmdon ah,11 be $500 a per iw inch Saves still b S 100 uch - -- - - 16. Contactor Is roest sibh for verifying wd tanfi-i.g all plain coums as supplied by do Landsope Archkect wkh field condkkxls u constructed. Any I -� stre dlpancles shall be reported to asca lndpe A-hl- for approval and yn. 17. Tree transpW,tlng dull be per/ortned by . suiobk hydoulrc tree :pads, soled 1401 RM ecessary n peNm, de work I6. fMor w commencement d anY conswmon, all exlstlng tree to remain shall art gF ire tree protection fern st outer edge of dripllne whenever possible EMMA�- i i - - -------- IHH 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Ta03.a64.0010 Feel.a64.d16) ww wagnerhodgron.rom G E I tl E ', T 14 2016 Of So. Burlington LARKI N TERRACE PLANTING PLAN REVISIONS •^'••` ^'•� DRAWINGNO. Io6 No 638 SCALE I " = 2O'-D" L290 DATE 10.1316 ray From: Jeff Hodgson <jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 9:31 AM To: Justin Rabidoux; ray Cc: DebSherman@larkinrealty.net Subject: RE: Residential streetlight standards Hi Ray understand the City's desire to standardize on poles and fixtures in the ROW and we will do so. Given Justin's response below - We just want to point out that the poles will not conform with the approved plan in case this becomes an issue down the road. Can you make a note of this for the record? Thanks, Jeff -----Original Message ----- From: Justin Rabidoux [mailto:jrabidoux@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 7:31 AM To: Jeff Hodgson <jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com> Subject: RE: Residential streetlight standards Jeff, We want to stick with what is contained in the approved spec sheets, cuts down on inventory needs for us. Please use the composite Shakespeare pole. Justin -----Original Message ----- From: Jeff Hodgson [mailto:jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.comj Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 4:32 PM To: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com>; ray <ray@sburl.com> Cc: DebSherman@larkinrealty.net; Skip McClellan <https://urldefense.proof poi nt.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A_skip.mcclellan-40krebsandlansing.com&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwgOf- v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=Au550bygGki21dfWmZ2LZmjlFvmXQkxo8b2j6i8ibH4&m=B- hBZbCzlPxv8VOn1glSOfegZzlzVczGTTa4NzgP01A&s=iefVBnBd-BewyH51RFUzeaRglQatcnfeZCMOQtxTgBg&e=>; James Woggon <JWoggon@apexltg.com> Subject: RE: Residential streetlight standards Justin & Ray We are getting ready to order poles and fixtures for Larkin Terrace and want to clarify something about the poles: - Larkin Terrace R.O.W. lighting was approved with the Lumec Metroscape Fixture (SB Standard) but with a Lumec decorative metal Pole (See attached cut sheet where I circled approved pole). In reading through the specifications that Justin sent out it specifies a composite Shakespeare pole (second attachment). We prefer the appearance of the Lumec 1 pole if that is still acceptable? Jeff Hodgson, FASLA Principal / Partner Personal email: jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 7 Marble Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401 430 Warren Street, Hudson, NY 12534 VT 802.864.0010 ext. 101 NY 518.567.1791 W https:Hurldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- - 3A_www.wagnerhodgson.com&d=DwlGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwgOf- v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=Au550bygGkl21dfWmZ2LZmjlFvmXQkxo8b2j6i8ibH4&m=B- hBZbCzlPxv8VOn1gISOfegZzlzVczGTTa4NzgP01A&s=KsWTLsiyjlfCe4R2FceZRwSeIX14wA61m3aowFBD4TU&e= -----Original Message ----- From: Justin Rabidoux [mailto:jrabidoux@sburl.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:18 PM To: Jeff Hodgson <jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com> Subject: FW: Residential streetlight standards Jeff, Attached are approved street light fixtures to use in South Burlington. Justin -----Original Message ----- From: Donna Leban [mailto:lightspd@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 11:29 AM To: Paul Conner <pconner@sburl.com> Cc: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com> Subject: Residential streetlight standards Hello Paul, Here are the materials I've developed for residential streetlighting standards. I have sent the schedule to the manufacturers reps for each product so you'll have a good idea about the cost of each option. This will be helpful information when dealing with developers. If you or Justin have any questions, just give me a call. Donna Leban Light/Space/Design 7 Iris Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 802 862-1901 office https:Hurldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A_www.lightspacedesign.biz&d=DwIGaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwgOf- v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=Au550bygGkl21dfWmZ2LZmjlFvmXQkxo8b2j6i8ibH4&m=YyOgstW2_6Q5WN9i- x2v7Xsa823bRV5gUB2UbZT-c-s&s=hGX1XYj_nKSJvBIO_kMCZsOnZdXSxFZv3SNWczNWr-E&e= 1c�/ ,y1 13 16 — -- — — — — -- — --- — — —— — —— --- -----� —71 —n—n I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I GARAGE FLOOR PLAN PRELIMINARY NOT FOR ONSTRUCTION z 0 z d 0 6 z RECEIVE[ o — —fl DEC 14 2016 gj o In L City of So. Burlington cc F-1 � i PROJECTM 1504 I I _ SHEET NUMBER tl A 100 15 16 09/14/2016 W K FIRST 1 3I = 1�{ IN 13 1 Kel PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION v A z 2 0 N_ W GG z w a > c. -9 o oc 0- Z m m � J W m LLQ z= �N Y r O - - 0 LL - ZECEIVED DEC 14 2015 CIA % U Q City of So. Burlington cc cc PROJECT #: 1504 U SHEET NUMBER A101 14 9 09/14/2016 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION " z 0 W OC O Z Z Q a W �4 , 26 o P Om J a H � LL ^ Li z m Zg Y o O U Q� " ---� o w Ln RECEIVED - 6 DEC 14 2016 s City of So. Burlington U d cc PROJECTM 1504 SHEET NUMBER A102 l 09/14/2016 0 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ai z z 0 z Z Lu 5 u s oac 4 o O!� Lu m J m z Z=_ U.. m pg Y 12 fz o O � g RECEIVED DEC 14 20% City of So. Burlington co PROJECT N: 1504 — — _ SHEET NUMBER A103 09/14/2016 T T T T T T 7 T PRELIMINARY Ell DI NOT FOR - - - - - CONSTRUCTION w A I G — --ROOF TERRACE C] (- Pp 17 0 -ROOF TERRACE I �- -1 -- - - -- - - 7F� ❑ TO rOPEN OPEN o BE OW Z O O FOURTH FLOOR PLAN u 01, oil LL1 z M � Z m ..- -1- -- -1 = g Y o ° g LL I s ® ® DEC 14 2016_ U - City of So. Burlington OPROJECT#: 1504. 3 3 _ SHEET NUMBER A 104 �� 10 it 12 14 15 16 09/14/2016 Y PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Y� of z z 0 W Y. Z N a 0 OQ w V Q � Z O � J fY 0 LLJ LL m W m P z m Li z 0, x oC 0 Q 0 Z W RECEIVED Al Q DEC 14 2016cc d City of So. Burlington PROJECT #: 1504 _ - SHEET NUMBER A105 09/14/2016 m® ®®O O O 0wm © O © O O - w y 1r i :w .v uollll tlllt Lee null tul� MAPPIN ■ ■■ — ■ ■■■ on s■ — -- ■ ■■ NOMA I in �111" © © O © 00 O O O O ®® O ® O r�l�j•rrr / /Il—, r I I II II 11 I �' �r rr rr • AlF • r rr [_ t s i � n /r FIR T . FLOOR�lJ® Y SHEET NUMBER I 1 � TO OF ROOF PECK 216 - 0 FOURTH 2,,. FLOOR�22F(yl rl" rA 1\ PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 0-- II ui V) z > Lu bt _j LLJ 5E N?FLOOR 2 00 7W 7� 9 171 1 1 911�5T FLOOR 2- - C. NED �EC PROJ ECT #: 1504 DEC14 20% SHEET NUMBER WEST ELEVATION A201 City ot tio. bumingtoll 09/14/2016 1 3D View 1 1!f_� 'ski li�i �_■u �' � Y 'r �� - s ® ,yg�i siol1r uu is � f � all fib _ � !1� IU �n 381 SIII an ■C■ 'i�_ -, p:.�111 iiil 7i a_ ili 1111 it>r. , n n 1'' 11111 )f11 . dll ginn 181 dffiAg w1 nv. u u ' H ';, �Idi# i111 � �9�. �� ���y 1R8 0■. 7 +e „ � , {� i _ _—--_.,.!�_-�=� � 1 4 3D View 4 2 3D View 2 5 3D View 5 3 3D View 3 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION w of 6 Z R Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 4-6 pm Peak Weekday 8-10 pm Peak Weekday 8-10 Peak Saturday Evening Peak Saturday Evening Peak 1. Palace 9 Cinema 1,000 Seats x .33 space/seat 333 Spaces 333 Spaces 333 Spaces 333 Spaces 333 Spaces 333 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Weekday vs Saturday 55% (July) 100% (late December) 55% (July) 100% (late December) 92% (July) 100% (late December) Hourly 60% 80% 100% 100% 100% (8-9pm) 100% (8-9pm) Peak # Required Spaces 110 Spaces 266 Spaces 183 Spaces 333 Spaces 306 Spaces 333 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace Apartments 15 apts. X 2 spaces/unit 39 apts. X 1 space/unit 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 2.2 Larkin Terrace Small Restaurant 2,000 sf x 12 spaces/1,000sf 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 2.3 Larkin Terrace General Retail 18,250 sf x 5 spaces/1,000sf 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 3. Zen Garden Restaurant (7,128sf) 7,128 sf x 18 paces/1,000sf 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% (8-9pm) 100% (8-9pm) Monthly 98% (July) 95% (late December) 98% (July) 95% (late December) 98% (July) 95% (late December) ea Ted paces 95 Spaces 92 Spaces 126 Spaces 123 Spaces 126 Spaces 123 Spaces 4. Artemis/Fitness (3,564f) 3,564 sf x 5.7 spaces per 1000 sf. 19 Spaces 19 Spaces 19 Spaces 19 Spaces 19 Spaces 19 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hou 100% 100% 80% 80% 30% 30% onthly 65% (July) 95% (late December) 62% (July) 62% (late December) 65% (July) 95% (late December) Peak a Spaces 12 Spaces 18 Spaces 9 Spaces 9 Spaces 4 Spaces 5 Spaces S. Former Inernet Cafe (2,677 sf) 50 Seats x 0.5 per seat (tavern) 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% Peak # Required Spaces 19 Spaces 19 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 6. Concentra Urgent Care (8,586 sf medical office) 8,586 sf x 5 spaces/1,000sf 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 80% 80% 15% 15% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 33 Spaces 28 Spaces 6 Spaces 5 Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces 7. McDonalds 3,500 sf x 12 spaces/ 1,000sf 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% (8-9pm) 50% (8-9pm) Monthly 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Peak # Required Spaces 25 Spaces 25 Spaces 21 Spaces 21 Spaces 21 Spaces 21 Spaces 8. Citizens Bank 2,644 sf x 3.6 spaces/1,000sf 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 10 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 9 Spaces 8 Spaces 0 Spaces 0- Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces Total Number of Required Parking Spaces 487.5 Spaces 640.4 Spaces 555.9 Spaces 701.1 Spaces 667.2 Spaces 692 Spaces Original numbers from GR 608 715 727.8 872.8 838.7 861.7 to existing municipal Recreation Path @ Queen City Park Road and Pine Street N/F Farrell Parcel L&M N/F Olde Orchard Realty Partnership, LP N/F Lowes 1195 Shelburne Rd. David M. Farrell Trust (west) N/F Farrell Distributing Corporation Automobile/Motorized Vehicle Routes Bicycle/Pedestrian/Recreation Routes N/F 1233 Shelburne Road Association Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. to Hannaford Drive and Queen CityPark Road 164 lchestr,VT0ite201 Colchester, VT 05aas L T: (802) 878-0375 F: (802) 878-9618 email@krebsandlansing.com LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE RECEIVED DEC 0 7 2016 City of So. Burlington CONNECTIVITY SITE PLAN 15300/DWGS/15300 Site Base 2016.dwg DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: DATE: REVISED: SCALE: CP-1 Project Phase FOR PERMIT REVIEW 1" = 200' 1 m kGNCKHUUUSUN I I I A R 1(1 N TG R R ln I \� Fayette Road I o J �� �MW � - 1®61RIIN sIEtrtwLLm. O o 41 X _ O P1 . — C6SINGfT c ✓fC narking I � I t` L FAS!•1G lll6i L-. � _ Ir I _- ___ II — I i � Ourinw PEIIGOIA OVE0. _y.___—. I r OUfDOOROWNG MFA I I 1— III, — 1 MUM I r - I_ IV If - _ I I I i kMOUNTABIF Mtl ,.. NKE�—— ....,•• - - �I — .. MlUflaG srAas —SH MOUNTABLE (.11Nl I � � roNsrnrFr C� 4tr Dan ovrsw.m ,i' r- •; O — _, .- 'T U ^, -- - 1 I F T CONCxO(£ RODNAtK 4. r - I I � 3 PINS 3 f'IN r- - r r- _ 0" PINE. v - ��r I INE -,i P a o s 3D'I PINE I �' 2QI r c - cp r - I ( r Ise, r APARNENT LCBBY I A;r Ram o�� ,, o,..OoO o -1919 �.a f A1RON COI.KIIETE RDLWAIj 1•GH sumAu 20 0 20 ao SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LARKI N TERRACE LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN REVISIONS •10.27.16 - PARKING LOT 11,02.16 - CURBS & LOADING DOCK DRAWING NO. m No. 638 DATE 10.19.16 L I O OPEN SPACE r — —1 PARKING LOT INDICATED WITH SHADING I I TOTAL AREA: 21,286 ft' 32,806 ft' (29.6% of 110,812 ft2 TOTAL AREA) ., ._ J \ PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE \\� � TOTAL AREA*32 ft' 7 1 \ 1I cb b 1 Estimate of Probable Landscape Val,e (Trees and Shrubs) I I OWN 16 ITEM PLANTING Qu"d<Y Unk - UrAt Coat Unit'.. Syringe red<ulaa'hrory Silk 2.5'-3' Cal. --_— _-- 4 EA $500.00 S2.DW.00 GWI.i trivandws'Streec Keeper' -HONEY LOCUST S"-S.S" M EA $Z400.00 833,600.00 Gledkda tdarandm'Slvd« mi - HONEY LOCUST 5"S.5' 7 EA $2.400.00 816,800.00 Aar x Fnmaml'Annstraq - FREEMAN MAPLE 3.3S' CAL 7 EA S6SO.00 g4SSM Acar x Framan0'Cekbntlen' - CELEBRATION MAPLE 3.33' CAL 5 EA $MOO $3,250.00 Ukaa Amariam'Princaton' - PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 4-4.5" OIL 5 EA $1,600.00 g8,00Q00 Bwua nign'Heritage. 4.S%S'Ca1. 5 EA $I.Sw-00 $7,50Q00 5 GAL Shrubs (Fydrxngm. Uac) 13 EA $70.00 g910.00 3 GAL 9lruha (Nkebark Rose. Sumac) 173 EA $65.00 $11,245.00 Pial 5ubtad S97,855.OD 3% of $250,000 87,SW 3% f $250,000 iS.000 1%a$7500,000 $75A00 MINIMUM TOTAL $87,500 t X (n AAA a - I — I —4 v X' Fi 1I� [/ctyGt AA� Ijlt\ �II1J�U PLANT SCHEDULE KEY (ITY SCIENTIMNAME COMMON NAME Sea SPACING DECIDUOUS TREES AA 7 Acarx Frei VArmI FREEMAN MAPLE 3'-35' AS SHOWN AC 5 AarxF—N'Cekhntlorr' 3%3S"CAL 3".3S'CAL AS SHOWN IN 5 B,swa nlg a'Hwioge' (Single Stem) RNER BIRCH 3.35" CAL AS SHOWN GS 14 GkdWatrlanndsa'Straet Keeper' STREET KEEPER HONEY LOCUST 4V5' AS SHOWN GT 7 Gkdt,b trivand— lhlidmram' SHADEMASTER HONEY LOCUST 44.5' CAL- AS SHOWN SR 4 Syringe reticulan'Nory Slk• JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2S" CAL AS SHOWN UA 5 Ulm. ameriram'Princeton' PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM iS.5" AS SHOWN SHRUBS HL 6 Hydrangea pruaka Utde Quick Rr i DWARF PANICLE HYDRANGEA #5 S. O.C. PO 48 Physearpus epurfoh.'Ut& Dedf NINEBARK #3 3W O.G TT 27 Texas x media Ta tonir TAUNTON YEW IB'-24' M O.C. SP 4 Syringe pawl "in Kum' MISS KIM KOREAN LILAC #5 T D.C. RA III Rhos A-1ka'Gro•Lml DWARF.AGRAMSUMAC ORNAMENTAL GRASSES O< B2 l�srAampsa «spume TUFTED HAIR GRASS #2 2V O.C. MS 22 Mbemhm dnensis'Grxillknn' EULALU #2 13W O.C. SH 1 124 Sporobalus hwerokpsis PRAIRIE DROPSEED M 111I O.C. PERENNIALS HH 273 HenrarocaEs Happy R,xurw• DAYULY 1 #1 IS" D.C. RF 95 Rudbecka fulgida'Goldstumi BLACK-EYED SUSAN 1#1 N O.G PLANTING NOTES I. All pbm nnterlal In the pant schedule shag be nursery grown in accordance with ANSI in accordan. with Z60.1 Standards for meawnmenc of numry stock 2 All pants shall be guaranteed by the Contractor for a period of one year Mom date d receipt of ProvidorW Anepiant, of Ne completed lmtalla by the Owner. 3. Repacement plantings will be required prior to RrW Acogp for any plant, which arc missing not we w spedllad.= have died or are unheakhy or uncharacteristic of the species (due w excenive pnminy dleba k or other ores). 4. All plant mmms. shall be s.I-.d and tagged it Ne nursery by Landscape Arthken *•r,,, 5. The LwdwW Architen's approval is required for any plant material substiallons. 6 The Contracsr is respomible for immediatey notifying the landscape 4 Archkmx if am pant quantity dacrependm cuss between dre planting pbn and '["�c„•.., the plant use 7. All shrubs and trem will be sprayed *tI, the and-dmlcrant -Wik-Prof (or L.D approved equal) prior to Ne first Winter (no later Nat November 30). S`v S. The Landscape Contractor shag haw Ne General Cantrattar local all .,V underground udlid. in a m be land —pad prior to commendnany ex.vation. Adjunmems to tree locations wll be a11,wed whero udlity conflicts are clearly a problem and with prior site approval by landscape 9. All plant bad, shwb and tree location shall be snked in Na field by Contractor for landscape Archkecta approval prior to innaladon. iwW 10. AdNstmeno to plant beds shall be approved by Land Archk� I. General Contractor is responsible far all erosbn comml m res during strumon. 12 Allndiswrbed areas are to be topsoiled and seeded or nodded. as indicated in Ne planting plan. 13. Mukh shall consist of double -shredded hardwood mukh or approved equal and Contra— Is rmponsible for providing samplm of mulch to Landscape Architect Mulch plant materials m shown on pan and d,wils. 14. It is the imam of this -irm- to avoid any diswrbance to existing trees or shrubs on site osh,r Nan those specifically designated for transplant or removal. 15. Liquidated damages for trees damaged by ccrstrucdi n opendm shall be $500 per offiw inch. Shrubs shall be $ l DO each. 16. Contractor Is rmpamible for wxifying and confirming all plant c supplied by do Landscape Archkett with field omdkbns as conservcmd Any dbvepancies shall be repored to landscape Architrxt for approval and direction. 17. Tree tramplandng shall be pert m "d by a suitable hydraulk tea spade, sisal necessary. pekrm Ne work I& Prior, . -inin-o—mc a my constwctlon, all exlsdng trees m remain shall reserve tree procacdon fen. at outer edge of dHpline whenever possible. (6n Nw I� 101w i 20 0 20 40 SCALE OF FEET WAGNERHODGSON LAN L)SCAYE ARCHITECTURE T802.861.6010 f801.86M.616] ww waynerhwtllren.tem LARKI N TERRACE PLANTING PLAN REVISIONS •10.27.16 - OPEN SPACE CALCS. - •I 1.0216 -OPEN SPACE CALCS. e wau.0 raw DRAWING NO. K3e NO. 638 SCALE I" = 20'-0" L200 DATE 10.19.16 a. n. m n. a+ E. a, m m u x+ n, m m a. b+ n, a+ n, a, n+ n+ a+ n+ Awnumrwrw+awMxrrowowwtouusnneuaaua,vo W nCrt'Mn11 M GICLLAT®sKE OII N 116116 tNGI Aewa1W OVMIaaIMYLaMapRK rooTN awwnwia2 q�Cwa�� aw®wtanene/atiw>gnwert®nanesro ' De 4a m U, U m U U m ba m. U D, U fl, U m na m U U U la U U U m as U 4, 4, E, D, n. U be he 4. m m U m U N.IICInTBNDtMIWlplllnllllwO.MY1Cl NID.tlaR a, U A�>eaMwarocamwaa a.lellpYi.lpAlaml>nN Mlaealapel TMEaY " NeM�rwewrvaMoar.AweorreMorAEeeaaasbxrwnr.t m U U m U ewaaersawa aenewnvaimOaaT®eTmMMLUGT10efda yqq R�wr iw�cai.®uri®a.wr„etrana X m U' II+ 6+ n, U U m U U U U m Yz 1, U U U Ya m U Er ar b, U U al be be m m U a, b+ m U U Da U m U m U RpMf®gIDBlRyppM.eL'ReTroYBaYMTM.arrne . 4. MP,.ORmlOefi118OMxwO�nl11®lO.fwtL m 4+ x, n+ m 4w n. U m U m m U T, b, 1� U YJ !e; U U"]♦... 1, U 1+:; `J�«L \i YJ L �- _5f le 1a m Ep. U m m m U U U m Ee m m m U b, b. U U b. ry m U IIo U 11 U U n. m be tl>'U b. Ue1"6r U 4r ._-..-_._ kl :Aa L 1Jm bi m U 4+ m g L 1 U is U U U n, a, as f b. U U a, U Ds m U n, 1" U U U Sa~ U U nr a ff.. m` e u u t .a... u m+aG u ea m m h,a as"....0 m ne m a, U U UU br a. 4r U m U m m U by m 1., to to nt U 4a m U« r tU u i m m DJ m m m u 1, u 4 Ra 1a 1. m a. m m A, U U U a. U f, U m SJ 1 m 1> 1a ' m u t+ •u u "m m n, m z L l., U m as U 4+ m �. b na ar v a, m a, se l 1J >. L+ 1.. a. ae n. n+ n, i U U Da h+ n, + CW=WtlDn Summe,y L�bN Avg : Ma Nln AvglNn MwMin ale 0 30 1.8 0.0 '. NA NA Lumxaire 3oMtlW (ro0e roaure reWOpe IhtmOere are not TPPe " Gly LLF Lum. WaftD) L3 1 0000 5E.E SPb Y332LED3K650 2L3 2 0900 50.E PMN SPi FLR Y332LED3K-550. 55 _ 12 0800 PROS•Y5-NW SW/VI3 • i9 0.800 72.2 SP2 ANG-GLA-9LEp-BW .�_ _.--. Ls 8 OE00 58.4 SP7-FLR-Y5321ED3K350 = S L1 M g99 W K LLLLLLLL'' ,�j f z Qy f J J = K q 6 2 bz U U U U -U. U 1.1 1, 13 1. ' n.. m m a+ m. m b. m t?•g. m m m a u na u a. m 1. 1� a 1J 1, m u m ba ;J U m m L' m m U U in' 1a U m m U U U U m 1, iJ: \. 1. 1. U U m v � E:u 1, w. 1a m m m n+ E. D, b, E+ m u � a u 1 3 ; Ds m 4, U ba U m " U 1a 'V, m U b, W m U 6, U 1, 1s L 1J U 4r U m U m �._""" -._ k), 1,• 1J 1. 4 U ba 4+ a. «,« Dn m n, U U U U Da Aa. m. Ya 6a. Da. m m h. U 1., li �Y; t, U U U Aa: ,. m.:'.0 U �U 4 m U U h+ Dz Da Ds 6. 1s U m U WaEr nr U ar b. nabs Yf n,. nr m U UU U Ea:"U U m. m a+ m. 1a •lJ�1s - U U U 4, 4+ m U be be b. m e+ b, ba Ea Ee be b. U b. b. h. U U U U U U Da U De U Da U Ea U U n+ as b+ m m U D/ U m' na n, m be m m 1, Da U m U U m b, U U U U U m.. U. U ba m ba m u m m m m m m m m m m m na u m m m m m b+ b+ m m a, .....m �aa da m n+ n, a+ m oil a, eJ m m m bJ m n+ a, a+ m ae ba m no U U U U ha U U m m b. U E(LL q 0 Ar, rAo, southhurlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-� I - / (office use only APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW X Administrative o Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Marilyn Larkin, 410 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403, (802) 864-7444 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): v. 1304, p. 85 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft Same as above 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): William Nedde, Krebs and Lansing, 164 Main Street, Suite 201, Colchester, VT 05446 (802) 878-0375, fax: (802) 878-9618 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: bill.nedde@,krebsandlansing.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1185 Shelburne Road 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1540-1185-C 57S Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Demolish two existing residential structures, remove utility services, stabilize/restore site. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Larkin Terrace Motel/apartments c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No new use proposed d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 0 s.f. (all structures to be razed) e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 0 ft. (all structures to be razed) f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 0 (all structures to be razed) g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 0 (all structures to be razed) h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 40.52 acres, L774,779 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 7.3 % 130,258 sq. ft. Proposed 6.4 % 112,906 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 21.3% 377,983 sq. ft. Proposed 20.1 % 357,797 sq. ft. (additional coverage calculations provided on Site Plan) c. Front yard (along each street) Shelburne Road Existing 14.2 % / 1,050 sq. ft. Proposed 14.2 % / 1,050 sq. ft. Fayette Drive Existing 32.5 % / 4,350 sq. ft. Proposed 26.2 % / 3,506 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 42,000 s.f.* * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC (Not Applicable) a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: N/A $183,000 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2017 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE: A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of subm'tting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee tschedule. q C ez&" � L /( �/w/Vn m_d �& �4 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11 fee schedule. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS:A Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B)of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to start of any public hearing I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. OF APPLICANT TY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Administrative Officer PRINT NAME ❑ Administrative Officer Date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 \ N/F Lowe. ? — \ F Q NIF Southland � Enterprises, Inc. �I 928.33' \ - 11\I 1 N I fill 11\ 1 I N/F KAPSH.A Properties, Inc. 1 — 1\ 1 Parcel L&M Parcel LBM B 1 N/F Olds Orchard Really Partnership, LP � WF pale I r\ Orchard — PenrnrahiR,/ \ / �— S M 34a7'E _ — 1. L — — 513— &D4°47447, N/F Jolley 46.OB' — -- — — — — — — Associates, LLC N/F m R=270.00' L=88.80' 7 FeyeBe, LLD I o8 N/F CRE JV Mixed - Fifteen NE Branch We Rattail Ir F _ in f Holdings \ 1 e d 88.85, r— S 85*09'16'E NIF Spillane Parcel C �\ s' l T 1 6isting City o1 South Burlington utility easement I 'I \ -act A�. — I WP Lerkei@ pbt I $ n L '$ \ \ N a y N/F Northfield 1 \I __.__..- — I m rA R=270.00' L=202.941 I R=15Ri0'L=9.51' - `�,` N85°1 B'03nN ' 60' witle righlal-way subject to irmvoceble oiler of tletl,cat,on - Parcel E 1 l i L&M cel .� .-.... .. 226,18 • 1 1 I IeP 1 I- \ ` _ 54114231y l pOWi Parcel D a' N/F Larkin I I ^............................10 ��a 2.54 acres' ?. tir $ t 1 1 141 45540 Q 585-13'S5'E I 5.7@ Weld 1faeM Re f N 1 � 1 m. Dowd M. Ferrell Trust (Parcel B) I4.11 acres lss anwvm. la. 1 N/F Larkin (Parcel A) 2.56 acres 711.28 - - _ 1 WE Farrell Dictdbufi corporation 8'2254'W N86°2254W Net°OS'S9'w 1\ ng rpora 60,13175.25' 264.89' \ i NIF 1233 Shelbume Road Association j \ a 3E Ii Zane Frn from Ciy, of South Budingron Official mapping � p O� f00' ZOO° 400' �• 1\ Ir\ Bar Scde r — too* 1 \ Site O LOCUS Planning and Zoning Information Are.: 40.52 scree (includes Farrell parcel) Zoned: Commercial 1 - Residential 15 Commercial 1 - Autamobik Lot Coverage: Existing Proposed L&M P.U.D. Total Aree'. 1,774.779 s.1. (includes; L&M, all Ferrell and Fayette ROW) Building. 130,25E.1 7.3% 112,gMat 6.4% Total lot coverage 377,953.11 21.3% 357.797 st 20.1 % Parcel "D' Total Area: 110,835 s.f. Buildings 17,352 at 15.7% 0.1 0% Total Mt-immge 64,145 at 57.9% 43,956 sf 38.4% Parcel 'D' Front yard (Shelburne Road Only): Total Area: 7.422 J. 1,050 s.f. 142% 1,050 J. 14.2% Parcel "D' Front yard (Fayette Road Only): Total Are.: 13,390 s.l. 4.350s.t. 32.5% 3.505.J. 262% CIVIL ENGINEER Krebs a Lansing sasn,, S Engine,,.,1Inc. tar Mun Consulting CokMabr. VT 0541e L e T 19021 eillt.5 F. (e)2) 97-.Is mail@k.b.and-.,, com FOR PERMIT REVIEW uf LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelbume Road, South Burlington, VT Savew Bank 212I'S50`2nrE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE - - — _ _ _ — N40'19'461N 37.24' 1WIFDemolish and remove two residential structures and sidewalks. _ Existing parking lot to remain CODILN1 NIF Wilson I- l. DEMOLITION .� '7arWl1► Investment OVERALL EXISTING dap - ----- SITE T-- N/F Megn and P.U.D. PLAN Holdings. LTD - Notes'. DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO NL=1530D - 1. Boundary inf—hon for Larkin parcels taken from plan entitled 'Boundary Survey -Lands of Larkin-Milof Partnership, LLP' by Krebs & Lansing, dated 329/17. Boundary information for DATE 4/J/17 Ferrell portion taken from a plat entitled 'Boundary Survey -Lot D of L&M Perk Subdivision and lends of David M. Ferrell, Trustee of Me David M. Ferrell Trust, dated 329/17. This plan is not a boundary survey. REVISED 2. Topographic information for Larkin parcel by K&L, summer 2016. Topography for Ferrell portion provided in digital file referenced above. SCALE 1'= 1W I—� 3. The underground utilities shown on this plan ere based on visible WiNies located during e topographic surrey performed by Krebs & Lansing. Underground utilities ere approximate and not warranted to be exact or complete. Dig Safe shall be contacted prior to any excavation. DE-1 4. Elevations ere based on the NAVD 88 vertical datum. 5. Project Hori2ontel Coordinates derived from DES obaervetion using reference Name NAD83 (2011) 2010.00 epoch. Project vertical datum based on NAVD 68 (geoid 12A). SB PERMIT DRAWINGS Site Demolition Notes:— / -- 1. This plan is f- CJvd site demoliion only. See Architects plans forbuilding and budding slab demolition. See Electrical plans for „. - 5awcutexisang cite. Remove Stairs and electrical Contractor shalllnvestgde possible -- electrical demolition. Cut and as service end e sidewalk to existing structure demolition. p existing g equipment. _ 9 -- electrical prior ?. Underground utilities are approximate and not warranted to be Coordinate all gas demolition with VT Gas 1 exact - complete. Contractor shall Contact New England Dig - - ._.1 Parkn lot - veleble Safe prior to ony—vabons _ -- servc to tle or ructioh and ` ` I -- - i \ a )vehicle access. No public nil e Cut and cep Y g sewer service (assumed location) I J. The /oration of underground electrical lines Which Se/NCe the Site Pu lights ore not shown on the Civil Pons Other electrical lines -- go may exist which ore not shots an this plan. �` taken to Sued leaking tliNnxd , . to Feyebe Dine. 4 P 'w to disrupting existing utilities, Contract- shall be Cut and cap existing sewer service responsible for con Arming status of ol/ utilities to be obondoned 5 A// abandoned uh7ities outside 6 ft. of the new building Close curb sto p/ I e R move valve box. footprints shall be cut, copped, and abandoned in -place unless Cut and cap existing water service - - -- ------ - --- �'A`T Ar-.- the remove/ of the abandoned utility /s required during s- J "\ m -�_ ; o ,env o.e �-�� i r CIVIL ENGINEER construction. A// abandoned utilities under and within 6 ft, of o ma _ the new bui/d'np footprints she// be removed A// abandoned I' \.. I }r ..-.-. .-"-'-C"..--::� ..- -, r _,_T-.w�_ -Y' _. — — ` I..'!. "..: '�., Kreb:BCerotrp Gonculone Enaineen.lnc. manholes catch basins and utility veults sho// be demolished I -�� 1 ,L�'4�z(�s, ,. —. m„ __ _-. l ,.r -a;,.. -.. \-..;. .. ... ra uun sn«t. suis sot and removed Plug en ends af� abandoned es - �[ ' cocne.nr VT as- manholes, oP P P r 1eo21 e)eAt95 the s, Auenre of the new builds footprints. Use send AA r, ,T..y t __. o.. -.�. _ _ r''� - 9 •��- " \ ` Cut tl dequipment.F: leo21 e1sam� cona'vits with con -ate or water tight cap. See Structure/ I Plons for ce, ofid requirements f- o/ itr-Jens removed flan within l u and p emoting gas oe an enwYa�xr.b«mtwwi .cam 9 P Reordinda ill gee demolitionrwith car Gas (7O.S OJ) for o// demolition bockfi// outside the in9uenre of the I I Tm oenl tact existing CB z G +11 Co new budding footprints (95A standard proctor compaction). move and dispose of existing cedars 6. All excess All, stumps, rock, topsail, waste, and otho material is :� 1 I 1 :� With geoteztile fabric placed -- - -' - Remove and dispose of existing maill,.... Wnaaln, the exclusive property of the Contractor and shall be removedi under grate boon the property and disposed of in a State approved disposal base o e o0ecw with native dww material601 NO 5703 - t= \ I \ F i l I __ -_—_ FOR PERMIT REVIEW Existing Ceder hedge to be removed and disposed _ I ': — u — , p� \ r n _ 1 rz I O 9 ! r -1� II \ ' Consult structural Engneer liar \ ill/compaction specifications - for existing basement it r I Eve t g Limit pag to damage to remain. Limit N9 % /- Ex' t ng asphalt pmk g t to rime n n servi �I Ph It n Temperer ly tlupublic r ng tleol t'on Gk construction equipment \ I close access to publ c use on asphalt surface Protect from damage. -I during demolition activities.LARKIN Contact CI of south R d' gton Water0ept pdartPany canatruct , kemolonGutand TERRACE cap eA.fing water service after tee Provide \ \ temporary thrust black. Route 7 ShelburneR I Road, South �v Burlington, VT : I All existing trees to roman Protect from damage � I :---- -------- t Existing storm aim n to be removed. Cut and cep awvt a NO. DESCRIPTION DATE to discharge epossible. Discharge IacetIan cank._Ebdrad CotaatorahII gta p elane dectricel sentice pr or to demolition. Existing two story mod structure, slab 'I _ yr Ii, 'gend foundation to be demolished. I X 1 ----- -- --- 201 _ — — _ _ Rem x st ri t d-fi plies n typ.) and anti k. ' / I � � NI other trees not'dentiletl on this plan ere W rime n. Existing buildings to be demolished. - Protect all twee from dam with fencing. CONTENT )� _ - - _ - _ _ - - 20g - Excavate sewcut, and remove portions of age wi rag. / the new - \ s" C Remove existing shed J - - -4 - t' g t � typical. theta b Existing Fa int equipment. slab and fence b //_1 /♦� � TI BX 1 L�V�/ YD y \\\ J ` - ---- ' ' Te Seek iMe back if onofemdnbuilding,within efluenc I from damage Structural Plains and Specificabom to, DEMOLITION remain.Protect ao new ing int. SITE PLAN mporery p f , g 71 Surwy Control Point /h i _ _ C...,confirmation that all se-ces are / - abandoned, cut and capexisting pipes Existing Slgn ? Re ve ez..t ng dumpster and screening / [ �/� and du'ts, typical. Exietin Light Pole \4, 9 r9h I i 1 4,1 � / Temporary Stockpiles Existing Deciduous Tree 1 / Existing Evergreen Tiee \ \ \ ` / r Protect and maintain ells s from Stockpile i - Exi'stk9 [;os Lin no/vee/✓ -- - - Eristing Sewer ane/llonhole - _ �l Stabilined Construction Entrance if Existing Storm Linelkanholel2ilasin \ data ' r5100/e.s . \ required. See tle . -- �, - Existing Overhood Power/Power Pole \ I DRAWN BY. slits - - - --- --- Existing Underground Power \\ (�r2 �: - I :'ROJECT N0. NL=7900 ----- Existing Communications Line DATE: G/J.M] Existhill Chow Link Fenre � REvlseD Exter isting Stockade Fence Existing NbLne/Nyxbont/✓o/w/5huto/, Approximate Prop-ty Line Tempority,20imde gravel construction access road. Remove.0 r gruel replete tepso 1 said and mulch at complat' of�emoNtwn — —Existing Easement - - � ---- - i I r Ana- . New EPSC Slit Fence DE-2 I BF New Barrier fence � -- - -- Open gate trO --_ - ' Pad Ph.. Aspho/t/tonrrete walk to be removed D 20" 40' 80" s for consucGn accessoy I SB PERMIT DRAWINGS Structure to be removed Bar Scale 1- 20' i it Tree Protection & Landscooe Cleariny 1. AN trees to be sowd within the designated construction zone end within 10 feet of the construction zone shall be protected by no less than 4' high plastic fencing at the drip tine completely encomposstg the free No storage of butting materials shall be allowed within tree protection fencing. 2. Damage caused to specimens due to contractor negligence shall be replaced at the cost of the controctor. .I /f equipment is allowed, with prior opprowl from the Owner and Engineer, to pass own a freers root zone then o minimum of 8" of wood chips shall be laid and maintained by the c Iroctor. 4. Any tree pruning shill be done by a qualified cmtroctar 5 During excowtion, if root impact is imomWoble any root system encountered which is 1" in diameter or larger will be pruned by outhon'zed pe,sonnet only ANA stondords for root pruning shall be followed. 6. -here on existing tree meets new londeceping, grade topsail at o depth of 4" (four inches) ham the drip the to 0" (zero inches) at the base of the tree. Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Notes 1. Cmtroefor Moll be n sli/e /kr c aynD with d/ State and Lora/ wow prevention mrd e ee ent owns, and permit r6,i wew,b durerg contrive- 2. Me limit of dirr,r - Mdl be deon, de9ned by Curt tors W Xv pow to dewinq. E iar wd mdhnwt contra,' obMcw Mdl be estob/i~ to hp sodenwt on its. J All eroiw contro' Moll be plocea' as Moan w the oroengs o- os ndwW by the Engk,ew Me Cwf ctor Mo// mo/ntoe, Me _!on conbd meoeurm unto Me En9Meer /s _ftfed thot pe—t ground rover / estodiMed ond Mot nrrthw mpaurca arc not rpu! ed /t Mal/ be the nN`P ty of the tbnbocter to enw y gvnybrJote waive earrrro/ iw Meer inthese oroeeps veal y ~ mmwres os necess y to bop eedknwt wife. 4 All seas of dhturbonce Moll be pwmonsnf/y or Mmpd'ordy alobll eb' os roan be poseb/e wd r/thk, 4B noun of find g obe q.. Art oreos of isturbwce Mall be of !sort remporonry arobp,}ed nth/ 7 deye of nt;d e/sturbwco AV OiWrbanco oRw 7 con—,bW oleo of exposed sell rid/ be atabai-d dow, uN.- Me J,escpt/ons pp/y 1. StobAzoton not regrr/red ;l s."h— b fo continue bra Me wro in Me next 24 noun ,no' there is no p' (orfohan bxarf h foe nett 24 nourc 2. Stobd/ oMn not ired if Me ewe N occun*9 m o elf-coneahe evrnwtiin wfret) nth o dpM of 2 n. requorgreats (e. g. nwx Awndoriar ercawf/w uMity hwdfp). slobArietio, measurer Md/ and iAe M'/dr wd netting, ww�w ewhH —H*A cruried store. or-W,, er powmwf S Refer to the Low Rhe Site /twdbook fir Eroiw Prewnfw wd SevM-t dntnV far oocebtobA. merhoda of srroarotr ,. 6 77e Cwheeter Md/ ,ee refer ter dust control Mere eol be a 2FRO rderwce lbr out 7 the Cwhocfer Mal/ proM We prolooil , around oa cord, boeiN, (. thv or ne) Mat colecr cwatru t— ifs s/wrnaotw taint/ OvNsd store inlet protective r b oleo m raw -pose e A stotOreil m,seuetia, mironoe (See Defoa) Moo be, estoilOd anm maat d ned al awsMrot4,n boa sr /oaobon. 9. All coved roads used by pawrructian wn/dss Md/ be srpf doily durMq priods of active ehuction. or of o grrofer trequwc /f der erpro- ;s froaFed firm the ife. the Sept debrfs Moll be ilrun.,Aoby remaw0 /raw me curb face d ppa'".. 10. All twnporary erosion and setlknwt crr,trd meosurn well be remo..d rnhAr JO dap onw rind "."on or onw rr,e measures arc no longs needed, un/ass ornernx-ilonled It. All sedinw f ramose fr eedenwt contra procuW Md/ be p/ocee in w lWrbr sal d/pow/ 12 A// oreos Mof ob not how "tw'Med faf/m by October ISM mart be statil reil nr occordonn rich Me Z r cwsfrictrcn Rpuirsmsnfa hitsd w Mis Meet. IJ After Pm —t s W Me Cb ho to' Md/ be rcpwerb/e fix ectwing, rf necosso n to mavrc .dpuofe vegetal/w growth. 14. -later Aram deeoten D botim ties Mot sots off ire mart be door abler moat not be P' pad info stains s R lik- er veer/ands un/ens the sots / dear. 15. Me confrecfor Mail be rewc ehie far e# mpoct- ond maintw,w,co of Me sroim ee,r t— ~ mdT-1 confrd practices lair Me prowt. /nspwriws ced caneepo ndh9 reports Mal/ Oe cw-lW sd of o mMeeum, ante o arse wd onw eery precptatm .w,f Mot results An o di Norge eon Ms wire. Soil and Seeding Notes 1. Top7 shoe/ be screened ond Mal/ how o minimum 4" depth -Ness additional dpM 4 spec/Fred on the pions Top 7 shall be natural, forger, M'oble 7 nwresentatiw of loco/ pnoductiw 7 and tree of day lumps stones, subsoil or other hreign mot- not frozen or muddy Acidity range PH 5-7 not less Mon three (J) percent humus Samples wit be requred for eppro.W. At 7 testing costs wall be paid by Contracts. 2. Conrmer A71 fwfdiior shall be a complete plant two containing nitrogen (50l organic) phosphoric acid and potash. Sot tests wd/ i),d,—te —Posit- required 3 Hydra seeding is the preferred proct,- fa- turf estoNahment. —dr lions ore: FwMi 19-19-19 75 lbs per /,000 gatons of rater Len. 100 At'. Per 1,000 gallons of water Seed.6 Abs per /, 000 square feet. 71. 46X Min. Future 3000 Per Rye boss C m: 90l 1481A Min. 0,—ty iol/Fescue Germ: 90.f 974N Mh. Cr ping Red Fescue Germ: 90X 2. 321 Max. Qp 1.61X M.I. Inert 306A MoxerMuch0bOO gallons of wafer. roeir— 5 bs ow 1,000 gotws of wets. 4. Me gross seed may be pried by hand method at o rote of 6 Abs. per 1,000 sq. n. 5 Areas hoeing sot pnetion os o --It of vanstruction shot be rot. -!lied oriw to seedfng. 6. if hand sewing, only strove mulch is to be used and secured by neethg ether organic or Inorganic if inorganic is used; it must be remowd before the Met mowing. 7 Starter fertdiw shol/ be applied of the memo/ rote at the time of sewing. FertAixw clwicotiw x not be otowed In sens/t/w areas and od)ocent to drainage w nr as determined by Me Engineer 8-btw/ng is to be done by the Cwtroclw to maintain props growth. Cwtrector shall supply the eater and all apparatus necessy to -ANY the rots (:e. hales aprmkiws, etc.) 9 Stoking or of topsoded areas to contra foot tmff/c wAl be requxed Acceptable stoking materials wAl be grade stokes and twine or stung with fogging bleached for vistUity. Contractor h rosponsble to maintain stares throughout the wbmonty period. 10, A gudrontee through the fret growing reason /s rM I-d with any r0.,— a- bare seas larger than 1 sq. ft.. to be redone. 11. The Contracts shall test topsoil to Net—ine props rliptfrot/ rote of erne ond ferMim. Submit tests to Engines far pprovel. 12 Seeding is p—itted /ram May, 15 - ,Arne 15 ond August 15 - September 15 Ocher seeing 7s poesb/e at other times w;th pus im—ea, tram the Engineer. General Grodina and Site Work Notes 1. A// area disturbed and oft areas within the Nearing /emits shc/l be graded and comred with o minimum of 4" of compacted loom topsu/ The oreos to be loomed shall be free and Near of roots, waste material and other detetenous material. Topsoil shot/ be spread and tightly compacted to o depth of 4: Topsoil shall be approved by the Engineer. 2. All cut slopes shall be no steeper than Jh on lv. All MT slopes shall be no steeper than 2. -10 on 1.. J. Temporary set fence shall be erected prior to any cleanng or construction. Fencing may be wetted in phases, but /n no case shall construction of Nearng proceed fencing. Special oreos may be designated by the Owner far preswvet/on of existing trees. Mom areas shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure no damage /s done to designated trees. 4 Existing plantings ore located in genera/ oreos as shown on this plan. Controctor shoal protect picot/ngs so as not to damage these or their root systems. 5. 57ope stabf/ty based upon unsoturoted sot conditions /f during construction saturated sails are encountered, contact the Engineer immedlotely O 1. Contractor shall be responsible for the into/lotion, mointenortce and remove/ of silt fence in all locations shown on the plans. 2 Maintenance shall be performed as needed and material remowd when sediment reaches half of fabric height Remow -bad stakes dr/wn on slit fence after successful establishment of vegetationdown slope side of fence Uftr,i 100, 6/ter fabric Allmr/ IAox rater fabric attached to Stople fobnc to wood stake A stokes on upsope side. Stole Form 6" (min.) deep trench lay fabric / bottom cover with on -site material. ewe sawast spa sra,.1lli CIVIL ENGINEER Uif silt fence is I I V I, V Knbc B —mg C..0 W g Eng—, I... I6"mh. installed when ground V v V lea M— welt, swr z.I Sect/In A —A is frozen, o grove/ or / CT (—):7.-6M sand ballast must be Silt fence spacing ChOrt L r. je02) 7a-991e used. A email@krebceMbnein SlWe TLdt fence spoa/ng e.aom ST to 101 50 R. or less lOX to 2DA 25 N. or less > 20X 15 N. or tens Typical Temporary Silt Fence aoao IERrN�„ ; tE er rs SS A _- _} NO 5703 _ *- Exieting pavement %sips rc B" or roadway "ri'`.r�llll� llTiliil , mC' Existarg ground � �7 FOR PERMIT REVIEW Minor/ 5001, fabric �9re Pro fde appropriate transition between Stab/eied Const—A.7 Entrance anal roadway Exirting� 4" minus ground crushed stone �N '� (✓Aor 704.17) !0' min. rod P/on LARKIN Nate: TERRACE - Controctor shalt be reponslble far the installation, mo/ntenonee, and remowl of o stabilized construction entronce at each construction entrance for the project Route 7, Shelburne Road, South The Construction Stobt/zed Entrance and its continued mo/ntehonce shalt be a Budington, VT minimum measure to prevent frocking of sediment off -site. - Contractor to use NYofi 500x under stone for tempo -airy construction roods. - Stabt/red construction entrances shot/ be repaired when wids ore 80Z fitted with NO. DESCRIPTION DATE sediment. Repair shot/ include oedng oddYimol 4" minus crushed stare and/or remove/ of cartoon/noted stone. THIS DETAIL TO HE USED FOR ALL TEMPORARY STONE S TA HIL IZA 7701V AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS Temporary Stabilized Construction Entrance & Staging Areas N. T. S CONTENT North American Green S75BN Moteriol Content DEMOLITION Straw 100A (.501br/rq.yd) (.27kg/m2) CIVIL DETAILS Netting Lend woven, /00i biodegradable Bete ribs HbIght approxknotely 1.64 Abr/IOOO xf. /!tread siadegrddab/e Instated os per monufocturer'r speoir=tkxne Moteriol SpeciScotions Erosion control blanket shall be o machine produced mot of 100Z agricultural strove DRAWN sus r-kI,..: KL•153M The blanket shall be of-sletent M/Nrness with Me straw evenly disinbuted over the entire orea of the mot. Are DATE. 4017 blanket shall be covered on the top side with natural fiber netting having on approximate 1/2" X 1/2" mesh and be sewn REVISED together with biodegradable thread Straw erosion control blanket shall be S758N as manufactured by North Amer/ron Crew,, Inc (812-867-66J2) air equiwent SCALE Ai.. Erosion control blanket steal/ how the following properties: Erosion Control Matting DD-1 Proled Plmae Se PERMIT DRAWINGS The Low Risk Site Handbook I., Eroslon Prevent on and Sediment C6Mro1 3. Stabilree Comtruetion Enfgnp ' F APatzoa aea a Repulremmtswn prrxmr• rW anx errs * i S0�,w 2. umit Dlatu,banee Area _- —..Rav to i t coon The Re4ulrements _ npn8n r ,ata swan tr o,¢. mr 1. Mnrk Site Boundaries la[v rr"" ann a a. nmr ea. anon, a �m r.al ,net :�a [o c tea, ma ormman ac e _ rev +kMaa' rsa�1 narges rr xrud w, maa � eXoreme emao, as sne. &a n.paaetl see.�m U[ n Apwml¢rnBon (aroaer r ,n are GevebVatlaz ereuu�o Js lw tl,nga etc.. �a� RetNlramm6.a I rrM,ne mvs rvtror mra memn81a1nre MN,n,ng w ne a of � 111111 Es 1. .Wwnecaw ar the pamn rtIM a l,e pem,nen dme nM en m. hw e.m,m rot rnr rig wgnM4 wiwcesd .:are8o rX.� _... — toIt.g w nearte e ¢ 8 � h xxx W Repair M'. I dam 8wm0 a orael. n inm ry M. esn,seo 3 i c a r 1 I n�dttyn¢ T. a e o n eon. III mm�gs n a alXa r mn-,,.: urger mnn rip WMranu.am. F�o It— art¢ moat Lw u x a.r.w. 4. IngNl SIR Ranee wT row S. Dlwrt Upland RunoR rlwce � SRlmus rim udrarff,naalr a,oee,w.a "•• "am _ � a.rM,:w- __—.—. _._____... _— '. r fl qulremenG. aa¢e ult+me Nern M ee. 8 aX�ann _ In. .re. rage aXlw,w. m r¢r1E,waeaa raar«»ew yr4,penrrn �arpanearo mom teea,weaary man • rrwn dc.,aa,w w M e wl ar I 1 r. ran OXmr werrerewer,mrrarv,rw rag br_rm .rym,aa, ye yva 4#apes ue n, tea awnro.0[ar .wrarna naa+w eyrM awry nr rM tolpX,w emw 4.ve w,aes ee ,-o.nw. sae dver,w j a I Li771- : I ,,,ara�wrwa. ya. a 1 Tagao-e � � S SIn Do nCh MRedR n 7 C MruetP tCoMola + Repulra rnG. 4 W fe.". »au:n.. aeaumnr v-wrine gem- i „„{^'+ ¢'.5" rw..as. _ dawmr4erm uagtMna w rrahGi% sn n s j i ay.:nmfrt wearaM r.noaa ar,sr` awns Oar rlr Arun nwtruxe i 6.aemv.+aNibn aeM-,:bercMs Now to nstal. r Meg s6oedayr:SmwnB e+ar es n r reipa n- _ aeovb to ' u —K✓ rw r nee.. .wrrw. areeel¢eea� �a39M stone rabXMaml , mtrcr a1Me YM red2u amch scone awA .. Mal One cNn.N.m ,wn aaeMr49osxk on.ttM tx .rgld w,a e.a.ar.amaaw'm..r .� rwaXr n,euWra a.m avers ent r,.naaw.'e Me1n� rce�rW -annry dany wevran wryer � aw ow P1 vSLmm�rer Yn eM 2. s wlaw stabuloDea rvapa Nn&' rotup`n6 � I Rena f —I—, 1D fbaMma fpirt RW GaY I a am Mrs ., n comae aowan »,1 ,.¢ mmung Maa-t rle ws+sa+ ,ryes~ a rew wwersnasaa.+o,. ,oW trew+wromvnw ler:e.sr eer t,e I �mmg$ RMpar¢mn6 xrs ev w a.. r«rx. aree.roa a• eeanraFc eer ra ..a_aeaM npw raee rceaa pornfa radmrr aware ra scow 61rmM wn an eD90 ave.. v,a m..m,van wY penenrnrowa amrtr arwu.Y., mramra Ili m .can Aee err AaMu.r,•sa §vw eelsno- are '.: -: .. "t . - wnm•m1., r.+,t.«c eee aesviem '' unL,v. .mrr r... c.mue, .re PeIKNremraXs.ed .�,nesnw paaecxarea ,.utrew n»aM wm esovm � j Atur _ �� re: � � _ rswsaaa✓Meerorra•naire✓Prrr _ mwc�aM fug An � I _ aaruWe eeca9[rona. rn wes <r wM ., cox rMe4ivea I �_ rYrrerweewMrr _ x «.an - ay. •r••Irar-sre—.rw r is er—�w.w�ar�rr E rgc4ere< - * Aam,wnw or wet sr�v�5t a¢rmem W _ soM a u M ar, 1 Y �_�-� eeewe Gam R ar.m�.gm,erwtm fl1° "8`w anM' � Mov,wr ene. twssn,ent i ' SMeS n eeMwmevirneanre .... u trio ° ave I 1X 1u+as Yzte'uaretunsroirrx<nrn nrraa arwa, os on �' .;�� en �emrn,rm anu,wra,.a�i.r ar:uttuen a the extd ..-.coca ara r n .n.r prunn. ro-e w —T— :.:..,s,e.yr.aa.s-rr i. Anirm,m:5 tt,c. hYer narrenarrae rrNfvn s� , ., ce ar,e wxa, rro •. Regnrema,R W $rw �v'� - nrm.recnw.i�drrrNUY rmvae i vc rrerbrr p,.orym arae i � ara -x 15L the le lv-e rge.ceea '� �� j wee. .m War .„a awa a aa.m ` ew.n o-mt ,na ea I. 11 tw,n coder ram.a9Mwrsd ma n&6.e Gna v«e. rrrrtroosr� I tr�mnw w, emees In•m 1. rnrs,.« wamvnn e+y eem,r ei"w .c �np open nnafrrra �'r � gear �denvv �. .. ��.. ,aa leaeauMe pwXn an�eroe� I wbr esr6ne. M'ael•6 erttrlH� . rcx ene Ke e.ms 2UIK wage Y, aaa.nr.ur.rs .teens, lrUueir n• ezw Sdamr. Ust s e. rn •M dau' 'r°"" rmrrrRrrraeer Mnm8O9O'v camM - :. rrrwa _s.wr¢rw.:.r.,.rr tarn_w+rw:nnr»a ¢.u.w.arwr.en.r.e_ ;. seeepM,gn LMr wM.eara watt ¢ wa met were aria ,anwvWs'M1r- aXms"aMaen�.a,r earn Ah — �_ 1lawrommply' 3 .,.a ]2.lMraWFISAetHro« Mmg9 , wr wwdm — — iz I.w.Rar tslte �— v� �_ r pw,rea fM, mweMr n � �� •„a .,a 8 annrire sovnM ,xey cows w+m ka,r8r6e urvuunau one, i apnry. na8ubr � rib -rwr-auYm, w nr wxmcm.. ce, Svc B. 5,aen w.aa, �, flegwremenG.�� wmr aaea. rs. Nrx, w,ve[bnsrurn4.oatAe Pr- 0 - eaes,m aee•aaa:mu„ l'r re ree art � er.a trio a�lallaaaerlrM a .,.......: 1 ¢araeW�r 'aarrryswr ... 4rrrwwaarerelwrr. � ��. Irrew,Rr war:nn xu. w.,—r rwej �rr.ronu+w, t�rle� 3'4 CarrlaRiraerara¢r o y e re m .erarrwb.wv wmrre,rm, Now II' W, M ncX art ne pM 1<ng1 mn.m rw engndan.anrry, 6eaume.9i troop a pa e w w Table & Contents U ^ am sedmaM control,. 2 Santa 2: Ib eq menG M 5 3 3 5 3 5 bi EX 1 G, t 5 6 G M 19 A 25 1 B N Sea sa ,r.aa 6 u rce 3a� Sec 3. 6 e Paco rrceb a e as Ibx [o rtnute area 39 CIVIL E'\GIN'EE1: M • ' KrB 8laminp Comu ,g Enpinean, lnc. '/.,//VRyrVal 1M Mtrin StrM Su1M 291 CokMRer. VT OSAap L T (902) 978-0375 F.(002)g78-0 emaII�LJXrebRand W ninp.com *y; NO 5703 nt� * 3 Y, ''OSIDIJAIIpt FOR PERMIT REVIEW 0 LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 11®v91a2R DEMOLITION CIVIL DETAILS trans .r.srM•erm ARItlR1erW Raaaaneaa ' --- ~- ___._ E,.,.awa.6na, d•n prl.us DRAWN By I PROJECT NO am —} "s — 9ret�aralro D"5dm,wxe.5errmrm DATE q' I w ✓ a �- _ wanr.n ,o. e. verm1035rn M S: auMrb lO NaT '. tv�a _ �.rrr 5>.e». w.a r...+.. umvw.ene.. wa WMe 056TO6nt1 . e01.RS13. - REVISED r1r, a.:- i, arowa fq— tm;zswnv wr«-.o: t e a�rmvao..ror. ,.vw.aaataara Norg.ommwa[w mm SCALE Contractor shall employ as many of these best management practices to prevent soil from leaving the construction site. If evidence is found of soil leaving the construction site, the Engineer shall direct Site Contractor to implement additional best management practices at no additional cost to Owner. 51 M L-11X0 46P7 As ot.d D D-2 SB PERMIT DRAWINGS May 16, 2017 Re: #SP-17-19 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sin4ely, R d J. Bela Administrative O Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com (d): All the commercial uses in the existing PUD are benefitted by a shared parking analysis, which reduces the required parking requirement, and an additional parking waiver. The Board gives preliminary support to this concept, but, because there are several questions related to the shared parking analysis, cannot grant a waiver at this time. H) OTHER ISSUES On some of the plan sheets the applicant shows a sculpture on the northeast corner of the lot and partially outside the property bounds. A condition of this decision will be to show the sculpture within the bounds of the property on all plan sheets. DFCISION Motion by Matt Cota, seconded by John Wilking, to approve preliminary plat application #SD-16-29 of John P. Larkin, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations will remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. This project must be completed as shown on the preliminary plat plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The applicant must receive preliminary wastewater allocations prior to final plat approval. 4. The applicant must receive final wastewater allocations prior to issuance of any zoning permits. S. The Board preliminarily approves the following waivers: a. Front yard setback of twelve (12) feet (a waiver of 18 feet from the standard of 30 feet) b. Front yard coverage of up to 100% (a waiver of 70% from the standard of 30%) 6. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 7. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 8. The applicant will be responsible for regularly maintaining all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on -site. 9. The plans and the TIS must be revised to show the changes below prior to final plat submission: a. The description of the project in the Traffic Impact Study must match the description in the application to the Board. b. The Traffic Impact Study must evaluate the impact of the proposed project with respect to the maximum number of vehicle trip ends (vtes) approved for the PUD, which is 623 vtes, and the study must provide information as to what the trip generation is for the 11 entire PUD including the current proposal so that the Board can determine whether the maximum number of vtes is being exceeded or not. c. Information must be provided with respect to the Traffic Overlay District for the entire project site, which includes the property at 1195 Shelburne Road. d. The Traffic Impact Study must provide the amount of additional traffic created by the removal of the Larkin Terrace complex and the amount of traffic estimated to be generated by the commercial portion of the proposed building in order for the traffic impact fee for the new commercial space to be calculated. e. The Traffic Impact Study must be revised to use Fayette Road as the street name and not Fayette Drive. f. The Landscaping Plan must be revised to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. g. The lighting plan must include the information necessary to meet the requirements of Section 13.07 of the Land Development Regulations. h. An eastern elevation which includes landscaping must be submitted. 10. The final plat submittal must include E911 addresses for the new structure in the proposed project, in conformance with local ordinances and Vermont E911 addressing standards. 11. The final plat submittal must include a plan for affordable housing. 12. Final plans must be reviewed by the Fire Chief or his designee to insure that adequate fire protection can be provided, with the standards for evaluation including, but not limited to, minimum distance between structures, street width, vehicular access from two directions where possible, looping of water lines, water flow and pressure, and number and location of hydrants. 13. The final plat application must be submitted within 12 months of this decision. Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Matt Cota Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Bill Miller Yea Nay Abstain Not Present David Parsons Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Jennifer Smith Yea Nay Abstain Not Present John Wilking Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of 6— 0 — 0. Signed this 18th day of January 2017, by t Bill Miller, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See 12 ol l Appendix E Submission Requirements E-1 All Districts Except City Center FBC City Center FBC District Site Sketch Master Major Major Minor Subdiv Subdiv DRB Admin Submittal requirement Plan Plan Plan Prelim Final Final Sketch Final Non- / Site subdiv. Plan BASIC INFORMATION V V V V V V V V V V Completed application form; three (3) full-sized, one (1) reduced [11" x 17"], and one (1) digital copy of plans; and a list of the owners or record of abutting property owners V V V V V V V V V V Name and address of the owner of record, applicant, and owners of record of abutting properties; and name and address of engineer(s), architect(s), landscape architect(s) preparing plans, plan preparation date, and date and description of all revisions shown on all plan sheets V V V V V V V V V V Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). The preferred scale shall be not more than one hundred (100) feet to the inch, or not more than sixty (60) feet to the inch where lots have less than one hundred (100) feet of frontage. V V V V V V V V V V Narrative accompanying the application to include the follow'mg: (a) description of the project; (b) demonstration of compliance with applicable review standards; (c) list of submission elements; and (d) list of any changes made to plans from previous submittals under the same application V V V V V V V List of waivers the applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations and accompanying narrative describing the request(s), detailing the City's authority to grant the request(s) and describing why the waiver(s) should be granted V V V V V Estimated project construction schedule, phasing, and date of completion, and estimated cost of all site Improvements. (note: for FBC subdivisions, only public infrastructure information required) V V V V V V V V V V Any other Information or data that the Administrative Officer or Development Review Board shall require for a full assessment of the project pursuant to the Land Development Regulations SITE INFORMATION V V V V V V V V V V Location map, showing relation of subject property to adjacent properties and surrounding area. V V V V V V V V V V Boundaries and area of existing subject property(ies), proposed property lines, continues properties, boundaries of all zoning districts, transects, and overlay districts, and all designations on the City's Official Map, and lots within the proposed subdivision numbered. V V V V V V V V V V Location of existing restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. V V V V V V Location of planned restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. V V Permanent reference monuments V V V Copies of proposed deeds, deed restrictions, covenants, agreements or other documents showing the manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas, and school site areas are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate from the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. V V V V In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street: A completed contract between the landowner and the City . regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of- way or private street and the responsibility for the roadway maintenance and a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other documents which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right -of- way, and a certificate of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfactory. V V V V V A complete survey of the subdivision, prepared by a licensed land surveyor, showing the location, bearing and length of every street line, lot line and boundary line, and existing and proposed restrictions on the land, including but not limited to access ways and utility easements. Where applicable, this information shall be tied to reference points previously established by the City. V V V V Lot area in square feet and acres, and lot coverage calculations including building, overall, and front yard coverage and the location and layout of any off-street parking or loading areas, traffic circulation areas, pedestrian walkways, and fire lanes. South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 Page 324 of 332 \/ •i Appendix E Submission Requirements E-2 All Districts Except Citv Center FBC Citv Center FBC District site Sketch Master Major Major Minor Subdiv Subdiv DRB Admin Submittal requirement Ian Plan Plan Prelim Final Final Sketch Final Non- / Site subdiv. Plan d d V Point -by -point lighting plan and cut sheets for all proposed outdoor lighting within the site V d d d d d Preliminary grading, drainage, landscaping and buffering plan in accordance with Article 13, Supplemental Regulations. d d V d The extent and amount of cut and fill for all disturbed areas, including before -and - after profiles and cross sections of typical development areas, parking lots and roads, and including an erosion and sedimentation control plan, and proposed locations of sediment sink/setting pond and interceptor swales. d d d NJ The location of any outdoor storage for equipment and materials if any, and the location, type and design of all solid waste -related facilities, including dumpsters and recycling bins. V d d d d Estimate of all earthwork, including the quantity of any material to be imported to or removed from the site or a statement that no material is to be removed or imported. d d V V Location of existing structures on the site, and showing all site conditions to remain. LANDSCAPE FEATURES V d V d V d d d d d Existing water courses & buffers, wetlands & buffers, base flood elevations if located in an area of special flood hazard, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other naturalfeatures J d V d y V Existing and proposed open space d J V d By proper designation on such plat, all public space for which offers of cession are made by the applicant and those spaces title to which is reserved by him. V y d V V The location of all open space to be dedicated to the City as well as all open space to be retained by the applicant or to be held in common private ownership. d V d V d V d d V V Existing and proposed contours at a maximum vertical interval of two (2) feet. d Detailed specifications and locations of planting, landscaping, screening, and/or buffering materials. d A general concept of the landscaping, both in written and graphic form. d d d d d A list of existing vegetation, with the location, type, and size of existing trees of six inches or greater in caliper. d d d V A written plan to preserve and protect significant existing vegetation during and after construction. Such plan will be of sufficient detail that the City of South Burlington will be able to inspect the site during construction to ensure that existing vegetation is protected as per the plan. V V d Detailed landscaping plan, specification of materials, costs, and phasing plan, including vegetation to remain, types of new plant materials, identified by common name and botanical name, sizes of all new plant materials by height and/or diameter at time of planting and at maturity, quantities of each of the planting materials, and treatment of the ground surface (paving, seeding, or groundcover) for all plantings, screening, buffering, and stormwater infiltration. d d d Detailed erosion control plan demonstrating compliance with these regulations BUILDINGS J d V I V U Existing and proposed structures d One set of preliminary plans, elevations, floor plans, and sections of proposed structures showing the proposed location, use, design and height of all structures, roads, parking areas, access points, sidewalks and other walkways, loading docks, outdoor storage areas, sewage disposal areas, landscaping, screening, site grading, and recreation areas if required. Plans shall also show any proposed division of buildings into units of separate occupancy and location of drives and access thereto. d d V Detailed elevations to demonstrate compliance with Building Envelope Standards and material requirements Solar ready roof analysis report d d JElevations of buildings proposed as part of Planned Unit Developments South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 Page 325 of 332 Appendix E Submission Requirements E-3 All Districts Except City Center FBC Citv Center FBC District Site ISketch Master IMajor Imajor Minor Subdiv Subdiv DRB Admin Submittal requirement Plan Plan Plan Prelim Final Final Sketch Final Non- /Site Subdiv. Plan STREETS AND UTILITIES V v v v v v v v Location, type, and width of existing and proposed streets and block layout (including roadways, sidewalk, recreation path) V V v v v Plans and profiles showing location of existing and proposed street pavements, proposed elevations along center lines of all streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, manholes, catch basins, and culverts v v v v v Plans showing the location, size and invert elevations of existing and planned sanitary sewers, storm water drains, and fire hydrants and location and size of water, gas, electricity and any other utilities or structures. V v v v v v Location of existing septic systems and wells. v v v v v Existing and proposed water and wastewater usage V V V v v Location and design of all utility distribution facilities V v v v The location and details of all the improvements and utilities, including the location of all utility poles, utility cabinets, sewage disposal systems, water supply systems, and all details and locations of the stormwater management system. V v Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may be required. V v v v Construction drawings of all required improvements. V v v v The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves tangent distance and tangent bearings for each street. V v v v v v v All means of vehicular access and egress to and from the site onto public streets, and all provisions for pedestrian access and circulation. V v v V v v Analysis of traffic impacts, if required by the traffic overlay district and/or the DRB. V v v v v Proposed stormwater management system, including (as applicable) location, supporting design data and copies of computations used as a basis for the design capacities and performance of stormwater management facilities. V v v Detailed plans, designs and finished grades of retaining walls, steps, ramps, paving, site improvements, fences, bridges, culverts, and drainage structures. V Overall plan for the property showing the locations and total combined area of the propert(y)(ies) proposed for subdivision and/or site plan phase, either in conjunction with the initial master plan application or in the future, specifying which area or areas are currently proposed for subdivision or development. V The location and total area of the propert(y)(ies) currently proposed for subdivision or development that are to be deeded as perpetually open spaces, and which areas proposed to be left open are subject to future evaluation within the parameters of the master plan. V the location, total area and nature of any public amenities or facilities other than buildings proposed either in conjunction with the initial master plan application or in the future, specifying which features are currently proposed for development. v The maximum impervious coverage proposed for the property or properties subject to the Master Plan. v The maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and/or number of dwelling units proposed for the property or properties subject to the Master Plan. v The maximum number of vehicle trip ends (VTEs) and associated parking proposed for the property or properties subject to the master plan. I* note: the Land Development Reqgulations may contion additional submission requirements for specific requests and dpplicotions South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 Page 326 of 332 xtra Jervices &tees (check ook, add fee as appropnare) ❑ rietum Receipt (hardcopy) $ ❑ Ret-- Receipt (electronic) $ Postmark ❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here ❑ A,!A Signature Required $ ❑ Adu@ Signature Restricted Delivery $ ( ' Certified Mail service provides the following benefits: ■ A receipt (this portion of the Certified Mail label). for an electronic return receipt, see a retail ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece. associate for assistance. To receive a duplicate ■ Electronic verification of delivery or attempted return receipt for no additional fee, present this delivery. USPS®-postmarked Certified Mail receipt to the ■ A record of delivery (including the recipient's retail associate. signature) that is retained by the Postal Service'" - Restricted delivery service, which provides for a specified period. delivery to the addressee specified by name, or to the addressee's authorized anent. Important Reminders: ■ You may purchase Certified Mail service with First -Class Malt°, First -Class Package Service®, or Priority Mail® service. ■ Certified Mail service is notavailable for international mail. ■ Insurance coverage is notavailable for purchase with Certified Mail service. However, the purchase of Certified Mail service does not change the insurance coverage automatically included with certain Priority Mail items. ■ For an additional fee, and with a proper endorsement on the mailpiece, you may request the following services: - Return receipt service, which provides a record of delivery (including the recipient's signature). You can request a hardcopy return receipt or an electronic version. For a hardcopy return receipt, complete PS Form 3811, Domestic Retum Receipt attach PS Form 3811 to your mailpiece; Adult signature service, which requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age (not available at retail). Adult signature restricted delivery serXice, which requires the signee to be at least 21 years of age and provides delivery to the addressee specified by name, or to the addressee's authorized agent (not available at retail). ■ To ensure that your Certified Mail recent is accepted as legal proof of mailing, it should bear a USPS postmark. If you would like a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, please present your Certified Mail item at a Post Office" for postmarking. If you don't need a postmark on this Certified Mail receipt, detach the barcoded portion of this label, affix it to the mailpiece, apply appropriate postage, and deposit the mailpiece. IMPORTANT Save this receipt for your records. PS Form 3800, April 2015 (Reverse) PSN 7530-02-000-9047 ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Artic a Addressed to: A. Signature 0 Agent B. Received-�(Pdnted Name) C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type ❑ Priority Mail Expresso it I'I�I'I I'll I'I l I l I Il II III Il II II I I I I I l I'I III ❑ Adult Signature ❑Registered Mail- 0 uIt Signature Restricted Delivery ❑ Registered Mail Restricted 9590 9403 0267 5155 1708 06 rtified Mail@ Delivery O Certified Mail Restricted Delivery ❑ Return Receipt for ❑ Collect on Delivery Merchandise 2. Article Number (Transfer from service lebe ❑Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery ❑ Signature Confirmation- -----" Mall ❑ Signature Confirmation 7015 0640 0007 8199 4102 Mil Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery PS Form 3811, April 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 Domestic Return Receipt UNITED STATEi S�AP�3'1}14C • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+40 in this box" ZY Or SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 USPS TRACKING# 9590 903 rtj8 Ue January 19, 2017 Greg Rabideau Rabideau Architects 550 Hinesburg Road, Ste. 101 So. Burlington, VT- 05403 Re: Preliminary Plat Approval #SD-16-29, 1185-1195 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Rabideau: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on January 18, 2017. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat review application must be submitted within 12 months of this approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer y, i Raymond J. elair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT: 7015 0640 0007 8199 4102 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Independent Technical Review Invoice Application #SD-16-29 Applicant: John P. Larkin, Inc. & Eric Farrell Date: January 3, 2017 John Larkin, Inc. 410 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 Pursuant to a decision made by the South Burlington Development Review Board (DRB) to invoke Technical Review of information presented as part of the above -listed application and as required by the "Planning and Zoning Fee Schedule" adopted by the South Burlington City Council on April 20, 2011 (as amended), please remit the following amount to be used to pay for the Independent Technical Review: Amount requested: $ 1,400 No Independent Technical Review shall be authorized by the City without receipt of these funds. The City shall hold these funds and use them only to pay for the required Independent Technical Review. If at any time the amount being held is reduced to $50, the City shall request an additional amount sufficient to cover estimates costs from the applicant prior to authorizing any further expenditures of the Independent Technical Reviewer. Following the issuance of a decision by the DRB, any unused funds shall be returned to the applicant. Further, the applicant retains, at all times, the right to request any unused funds be returned. Upon receipt of any such request, in writing, the city shall inform the Independent Technical Reviewer of this request and require that they cease any further work. Following the payment of any work done to date, the city shall return unused funds and inform the DRB that the Technical Review has been ceased at the request of the applicant. Checks should be made out to the "City of South Burlington" Please remit payments to: Raymond Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com v awl 04, 'EVA, Iii-W. south urlin ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD- - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑✓ Preliminary ❑Final PUD Being Requested?OYes ❑No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Marilyn Larkin, David M Farrell Trust„ Milot/Larkin Partnership 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) _ _ 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) John P. Larkin INC. Eric Farrell (On behalf of David M Farrell Trust) 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing addr ss,g ne and fax Rabideau Architects 7 TJ'v /,0-6 �� / a. Contact email address: greg@rabideau-architects.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1185 &1195 Shelburne Road, S. Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1540-01185 &_1540-01195 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Raze 54 unit Hotel and construct 60 residential units and 9,000sgft of commercial space at 1185 Shelburne Road b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 54 Unit Hotel (Larkin Terrace - to be removed), Movie Theater, shopping plaza, and apartments/condominiums c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 60 Residential Units and 9,000 sgft of commercial space at 1185 &1195 Shelburne Road. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Existing - Prososed - First floor: 21,178 sqft e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): New: Building height 48' - 6" Four stories and a parking garage f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): 60 New Residential units above commercial space g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): See narrative i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number ol'units, lot mergers, etc. See narrative Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 40.7 (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing 17,352 square feet 15.7 f Proposed 23,958 square feet 21.6 c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 64,145 square feet 57.9 % Proposed 68,738 square feet 62 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 4,264 square feet 14.8 Proposed 11,324 square feet 39.3 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) In September, 2016, Arrowwood Environmental conducted a wetlands survev of the southern portion of the L&M P.U.D. and the eastern extent of the Farrell property. Class II wetlands were delineated in and around an existing pond spanning the property line c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 68,738 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 Subdivision Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations) • 111 111 11 b. Landscaping: $ (Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 99.8 Peak trips 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Residential, business hours 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: All days residential, Saturday Commercial 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: March 2018 16. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy (1 I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time 4f submittin the application. See the City fee sch dule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of a(jinin;,,, property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.0i Q„ Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. AfteU complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draf hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of se� .r✓C '����"�" City prior to the start of any public hearing. flop I' AIV Subdivwsion.vppneeawn _ __ - I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Sl6.V4ATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this tine DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Co Mete ❑Incomplete 6A1,C F�t;->l2 e t / PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relei=ant state permits far this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Per»:it Specialist. Subdivision Application Form. Rev 12.2011 i PLANTING .... .- ;� ...- a,....,.. - Syringa reticulam'Wory Silk 2.5"-3" Cal. 4 EA $500.00 $2,000.00 Gleditsia triacanthos'Street Keeper'- HONEY LOCUST S%S.S' 14 EA $2,400.00 $31600.00 Gleditsia triacanthos'Shademaster' . HONEY LOCUST S"-S.S" 7 EA $2,400.00 $16,800.00 Ater x Fremanii'Armstrong' - FREEMAN MAPLE 3-3.5" Cal. 7 EA $650.00 $4,SS0.00 Acer x Fremanii'Celebration' - CELEBRATION MAPLE 3-35" Cal. 5 EA $650.00 $3,250.00 Ulmus Americana 'Princeton'- PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 4"4,5" CaL 5 EA $1,600.00 $8,000.00 Betula nigra 'Heritage': 4.5'•S' Cal. 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,S00.00 5 Gal. Shrubs (Hydrangea, Lilac) 13 EA $70.00 $910.00 3 Gal. Shrubs (Ninebark, Rose, Sumac) 110 EA $65.00 $7,150,00 Planting Subtotal $83,760.00 Subtotal 5g3,760.00 5% Contingency $4,188 00 "Meets Total Construction Cost of 58 Million ($87,500 Landscape Value Minimum) 1052016 &RSG the science of insight 180 Battery Street, Suite 350 Burlington, VT 05401 802.383.0118 www.rsginc.com REPORT LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 11.3.2016 PREPARED FOR; LARKIN REALTY SUBMITTED BY: RSG MARK SMITH, PE; DAVID GROVER, PE I is LARKIN TERRACE MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PREPARED FOR: LARKIN REALTY 1 0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS.......................................................................................................1 TripGeneration.................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Congestionanalysis........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................2 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC............................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES.....................................................................................................4 4.2 Background Traffic Volumes and Adjustments............................................................................. 5 4.3 Other Development Volumes........................................................................................................ 5 4.4 Trip Generation.............................................................................................................................. 5 4.5 Existing Site Traffic........................................................................................................................ 8 4.6 Scenario Volume Graphics............................................................................................................ 8 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................10 5.1 Level -of -Service Definition........................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Level -of -Service Results.............................................................................................................. 11 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................12 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................................12 7.1 Crash Histories............................................................................................................................ 12 7.2 Sight Distance Observations.......................................................................................................14 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT..........................................................................15 9.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND TRANSPORTATION OVERLAY DISTRICT................................16 Eli 9.1 Act 145 Traffic Impact Fees......................................................................................................... 16 9.2 City of South Burlington Impact Fees.......................................................................................... 17 9.3 City of South Burlington Traffic Overlay District..........................................................................18 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................18 TripGeneration................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Congestionanalysis......................................................................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 FIGURE 1: ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION............................................................................................................ 1 FIGURE 2: PRELIMINARY PROJECT SITE PLAN........................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 3: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS...................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 4: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 5: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS.............................................................................................................. 7 FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD........................................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD.............................................................................................................................................. 9 FIGURE8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD........................................................................................................................................ 9 FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD............................................................................................................................................ 10 FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ................................ 10 FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 12: AVERAGE MAXIMUM QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES)............................................................................................ 12 FIGURE 14: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY............................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR.............................................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE16: CRASHES BY YEAR.................................................................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE17: CRASHES BY TYPE................................................................................................................................................... 14 FIGURE 18: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO SURROUNDING AREAS.................................................................................. 17 FIGURE 19: PROJECTED SOUTH BURLINGTON IMPACT FEE.................................................................................................. 18 FIGURE 20: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 21: ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................ 19 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIX B. TRIP GENERATION APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS APPENDIX E. SAFETY DATA ii November 3, 2016 1.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS The proposed Larkin Terrace development is located in South Burlington, Vermont along US 7 at the intersection of Fayette Drive. The development will replace an existing 54-unit apartment -style hotel and will create 54 apartments, a 2,000-squarefoot restaurant, and 18,250 square feet of retail space. Vehicular traffic will access the site from Fayette Drive approximately 200 feet west of its intersection with US-7. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION After accounting for internal trip capture and transportation demand management, we project the proposed development will generate an additional 50 PM peak hour trips compared to the existing vehicle trip generation at the site driveway and a net 44 PM peak hour trips on the surrounding roads network (Figure 1). FIGURE 1: ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION Projected Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Total Enter Exit Apartments (54 units) 22 12 34 Specialty Retail Center (18,250 sq ft) 22 28 5o High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (2,000sq ft) 12 8 20 Total 56 48 104 Internal Tri ps External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 14 14 42 34 104 Primary Passby Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 38 32 4 2 76 6%TDM Primary Trip Reduction 36 30 4 2 72 Existingtrips 10 12 0 0 22 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 26 18 4 2 50 CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Drive will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. Access driveways for both the site and the plaza across the street will maintain LOS B. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the proposed Larkin Terrace development will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and ,will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. Ell Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This study evaluates the traffic and related infrastructure impacts associated with the proposed Larkin Terrace project on Fayette Drive in South Burlington, Vermont. The site currently contains a 54-unit all suites hotel. This building will be removed and replaced with a four-story building that will contain 54 apartments, a 2,000 square -foot restaurant, and 18,250 square feet of retail space. As shown in the site plan below, the proposed development will have one access point via an existing curb cut on Fayette Drive approximately 200 feet west of the intersection with US-7. FIGURE 2: PRELIMINARY PROJECT SITE PLAN This study relies upon design standards and analysis procedures documented in the 2010 Highway Capaoit!y Manual,' Trip Generation,2A Poliq, on Geometric Design of HighweD.r and Streets,-'Alanual on Uniform ' Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Highway Ca pacit ; Manual (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2010). 2Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). 3 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A Polio, on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 61h Edition (Washington DC::-1.-1SHTO, 2011). 2 1 November 3, 2016 Traf jic Control Devices (MUTCD),; Trafc Impact Evaluation: Study and Review Guide, and the Vermont State Desi,gn Standards,' which are the generally accepted traffic analysis references relied upon by traffic engineering professionals and VTrans for projects of this type in Vermont. VTrans guidelines specify that a traffic study should be considered if the proposed development will generate 75 or more peak hour trips. The geographic scope of the study should also include the iminediate access points and those intersections or highway segments receiving 75 or more project - generated peak hour trips.? We project that the site driveway will not meet the 75 vehicles per hour trip generation threshold. Therefore, the site driveway is the only intersection assessed for capacity and congestion impacts. The intersection of US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue is part of a high crash location segment, so we exanune crashes at this location. We also examine the distribution of project related trips at the site driveway and the US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue intersection for permitting purposes. 3.0 LOCAL TRAFFIC The project site is located on Fayette Drive. It is a two-lane, local road 40 feet wide at the site driveway and posted at 25 miles per hour. It connects US-7 (Shelburne Road) to the east with Hannafords Drive to the north. The road is unstriped until lane markings begin at the intersection with US-7 and leading up to Hannafords Drive. Across from the project driveway is a plaza housing a bank, a fast food restaurant, an urgent care facility, a sit-down restaurant, a gym, and two currently vacant store fronts. The section of US-7 proximate to Fayette Drive is a five -lane roadway (two lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane) with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. In 2015, VTrans recorded an annual average daily traffic volume (A,°tDT) of 31,130 vehicles per day along US-7 at station D577, approximately 0.4 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Drive intersection. Count data collected by VTrans in June of 2016 indicate the highest traffic volumes along US-7 occur during the weekday PM peak hours. Traffic impacts during this period are examined in this study. Figure 3 show the project location and study area intersections. This study only examines the PM traffic conditions. Background traffic during the PM period is greater than in the AM in the project area, so any operational findings for the PM peak hour will be the same or less favorable than findings for the AM peak hour. a American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA), ITE, and A�NSHTO, _Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 Edition (Washington DC: FHWA, 2009). 5 Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, TnaJiic Impact Evaluation Study and Review Guide (October 2008). 6 State of Vermont Agency of Transportation, Vermont State Standards (Niontpelier: VTrans, 1 July 1997). ' Vermont Agency of Transportation, Development Review Section, Trafc Impact Evaluation Study and Review Guide Qanuary 2003). 3 lu Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Stud, FIGURE 3: PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 4.0 ANALYSIS TRAFFIC VOLUMES This analysis examines design hour vehicle delays and queues at the site driveway and project trip distribution at the following two intersections: 1. Site Driveway/Fayette Drive 2. US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue (trip distribution only) Vehicle delays and queues are examined first with baseline, No Build scenario, traffic volumes, which represent the anticipated design hour conditions in the target study years without the proposed development in place. Once baseline conditions are established, anticipated traffic associated with the proposed development is added to the No Build scenario vohunes to create Build scenario traffic volumes, which are in turn used to project intersection delays and levels of service with the proposed development in place. A detailed description of the elements that contribute to the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes is presented below. 4 1 November 3. 2016 .l 4.2 1 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS RSG obtained the most recent VTrans turning movement count data at the US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue intersection (counted on June 30, 2016). This count data was used to establish background volumes at the site driveway. Trip Generation was used to establish turning movements at the site driveway and at the plaza driveway across the street. Following VTrans traffic study guidelines, raw peak hour traffic volumes were adjusted to represent the design hour volume (DHV)s in 2017 and 20229 using two adjustment factors: 1. Design hour adjustment factors are based on VTrans count station D577, which is located along US-7 in South Burlington, VT, just south of the intersection with IDX Drive. The 2015 DHV at this station was compared to the peak hour volumes at the intersection of US- 7/Holmes Road/IDX Drive on the date of the turning movement count to formulate DHV adjustments. This intersection is 0.3 miles south of the US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue intersection and both intersections were counted on the same day. DHV adjustments decreased raw count volumes by 4%. 2. An annual adjustment factor representing general background traffic growth is based on historic count data at VTrans count station D577. From 2010 to 2015, AADT changed from 29,300 to 31,130 vehicles per day, or 1% per year. An annual adjustment factor of 2% was applied to the DHV adjusted counts to grow the traffic from 2015 to 2017. Traffic volumes on US-7 are expected to grow by 5° o from the 2017 base year condition to the 2022 future ve.ar condition. 4.3 1 OTHER DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES Other development volumes (ODVs) represent trips generated by anticipated developments in the study area. Trips generated by ODVs are included in every scenario (both No Build and Build) because we assume they are already present on the road network in the analysis years. Through discussion with South Burlington Planning and Zoning staff, the following ODV was identified for inclusion in this study: 65 apartments are planned along Green Mountain Drive, approximately 0.6 miles south of the Fayette Drive intersection with US-7. Per Trip Generation, this development is expected to generate 40 trips. Based on the 2016 turning movements at the US-7/Green Mountain Drive intersection, about half of these trips travel through the US-7/Fayette Drive Intersection. No formal traffic studv was conducted for this intersection. 4.4 1 TRIP GENERATION Trip generation refers to the number of new vehicle trips originating at or destined for a particular development. Traffic generated by the Larkin Terrace development will consist of apartment residents, retail store patrons, and restaurant patrons. s The DHV is the 30th highest hour of traffic for the year and is used as the design standard in Vermont. 9 VTrans requires analysis during the year project construction is expected to be complete and in a future year scenario 5 years after project completion. pis Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study To estimate the number of new vehicle trips for the Larkin Terrace development, we examined trip generation rates presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation.10 Applying trip generation rates for ITE Land Use 220 (Apartment), Land Use Code 826 (Specialty Retail Center), and Land Use Code 932 (High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant), we calculate the proposed expansion will generate 104 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. This development consists of several different types of uses allowing trips originating from one land use who may be destined for another land use to travel within the development. For example, an apartment resident may walk to the onsite retail stores, or a restaurant patron may go home to an apartment. These trips are said to be captured internally and are not counted towards the number of trips generated by the development on the adjacent transportation network. We used the ITE Dip Generation Handbook" to calculate a 27% reduction due to internal capture. Internal capture calculations are included in the Appendix:. External site generated traffic can be differentiated between primary and pass -by trips. While primary trips represent people who leave their home, place of work, or other origin expressly to visit the site and who would not otherwise have gotten into their vehicle to make a trip, pass -by trips represent vehicles that currently pass by the site on the local road network and who, when the proposed development is present, turn into the site on their way to another destination. Pass -by trips are converted from through movements to turning movements to and from the site at the development access points but do not add new trips to intersections beyond the site access. Pass -by traffic is typically assumed to come from vehicles passing by the site on an immediately adjacent roadway to which the site directly accesses. However, due to the relatively low volume of through traffic along Fayette Drive in the vicinity of the site and the relatively high volume of traffic on US-7, we have assumed the pass -by portion of trip generation will come from US-7 through trips at its intersection with Fayette Drive. Due to the nature of the project, the percentage of pass -by trips will vary by land use, and, according to Trip Generation, will be approximately 8% of site generated traffic. Transportation demand management (I DNI) is the practice of reducing the number of trips during peak hour travel times by providing alternative travel means (discussed in further detail later in this study). Physical TDNI measures include being located near a bus stop with a shelter, having access to and providing continuity of sidewalks and transit near building entrances, and providing bicycle racks. These TDM accommodations can facilitate up to a 6% reduction in external vehicle trip generations= (the maximum allowed for only physical TDM measures). The site currently contains a 54-room apartment style hotel which, according to Trip Generation, currently generates 10 and 12 entering and exiting trips respectively during the PM peak hour. These 22 trips are subtracted from the development traffic to find the net number of trips that this development will add to the surrounding road network. 10 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition (Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). 11 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook (Xvv7ashington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2001). 12 Vermont Agency of Transportation. TDAI Guidance. 2016. 6 November 3. 2016 Figure 4 presents the projected trip generation, broken out into total trips, internal capture, primary traffic, TDM reduction, and pass -by traffic. FIGURE 4: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Projected PM Peak Hour Total Enter Exit Apartments (54units) 22 12 34 Specialty Retail Center (18,250 sq ft) 22 28 50 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (2,000 sq ft) 12 8 20 Total 56 48 104 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 14 14 42 34 104 Primary Passby Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 38 32 4 2 76 6%TDM PrimaryTrip Reduction* 36 30 4 2 72 Existing trips 10 12 0 0 22 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 26 18 4 2 50 Figure 5 presents a map of the estimated distribution of project -generated trips. Primary and pass -by trips entering and exiting the site access are distributed onto the roadway network based on background traffic volumes. As discussed above, the reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection is due to pass -by traffic and corresponds with an increase in turns into and out of Fayette Drive as vehicles that previously passed by the site divert into the site once the development is complete. FIGURE 5: DISTRIBUTION OF SITE -GENERATED TRIPS Plaza Drive US-7 0 0 0 5 -2 0 OIL cu C 0 0 2 0 o a y 0 -� ♦ 0 0 -► ♦- 1 Ln 4' o v 10 -y 20 7 -y 0 c U_ U `i t IF t 11 0 9 14 -1 0 Site Driveway US-7 Mm 7 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 4.5 1 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC The existing 54-unit apartment -style hotels generates 22 trips during the PM peak hour. This building would be replaced by the proposed development. Traffic volumes estimated at the site driveway include these 22 trips as well as trips coming from and going to the plaza across Fayette Drive. Due to the vacant units, total number of trips associated with the plaza driveway were estimated from Trip Generation assuming full occupancy. 4.6 1 SCENARIO VOLUME GRAPHICS Figure 6 through Figure 9 present the No Build and Build scenario traffic volumes at the two study area intersections in the build year (2017) and the future year (2022). No Build traffic volumes include the raw count volumes, adjusted to design hour conditions, and projected traffic from recently permitted developments in the area (ODVs). Build scenario volumes represent the addition of project -generated traffic (both primary and pass -by trips) to the No Build traffic volumes. With the addition of site -generated traffic, volumes entering and exiting the project site increase in the Build scenario and these trips are carried out through the neighboring intersections. The reduction in through traffic at the US-7 intersection in the Build scenario is due to the increase in pass -by traffic as described in the Trip Generation discussion above. These trips previously passed - by Fayette Drive in the No Build scenario but turn into and out of the site once the project is in place. FIGURE 6: 2017 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD Plaza Drive US-7 57 0 38 52 1232 22 42 -0 K- 62 41 R- 18 °>' o Q (U 132 -♦ 4- 193 7 -► +- 10 v o 4 6 126 t 21 c LL __. _ U 7 0 S 200 1246 16 Site Driveway US-7 8 1 November 3, 2016 FIGURE 7: 2017 PEAK HOUR BUILD Plaza Drive US-7 57 0 38 57 1230 22 �a# It %A .� t �'- 42 -0 62 43 -0 R- 18 o Q } 132 -► 193 7 ♦ 4- 11 N v 14 -y 26 133 21 c vi t e( t F F- 18 0 14 214 1245 16 Site Driveway US-7 FIGURE 8: 2022 PEAK HOUR NO BUILD Plaza Drive US-7 5■9 0 40 54 1293 24 Al t 'A .? t 44 -0 R- 66 43 -0 R- 18 � o Q °1 138 -► f- 203 7 -► 4- 10 N }' o v 4 6 133 22 c t �� t F 7 0 5 -1 210 1308 16 Site Driveway US-7 s Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 9: 2022 PEAK HOUR BUILD Plaza Drive US-7 59 0 40 59 1291 v 44 -0 R 66 45 0 41 138 -► ♦ 203 7 -► 4+ 14 26 140 `i t Ir t 18 0 14 le 224 1307 Site Driveway 5.0 CONGESTION ANALYSIS 5.1 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE DEFINITION US-7 24 M C 46 18 > Q ♦ 11 N 0 I" 22 c U F 16 Level -of -service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing the operating conditions as perceived by motorists driving in a traffic stream. LOS is calculated using the procedures outlined in the 2000 and 2010 Highway Capacity Manuals.13 In addition to traffic volumes, key inputs include the number of lanes at each intersection, traffic control type (signalized or unsignalized), and the traffic signal timing plans. The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual defines six qualitative grades to describe the level of service at an intersection. Level -of -Service is based on the average control delay per vehicle. Figure 10 shows the various LOS grades and descriptions for signalized and unsignalized intersections. FIGURE 10: LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 13 The HCM 2010 does not provide methodologies for calculating intersection delays at certain intersection types including signalized intersections with exclusive pedestrian phases and signalized intersections with non NE\1A-standard phasing. Because of these limitations, HC\1 2000 methodologies are employed where necessary. 10 1 November 3, 2016 The delay thresholds for LOS at signalized and unsignalized intersections differ because of the driver's expectations of the operating efficiency for the respective traffic control conditions. According to HCM procedures, an overall LOS cannot be calculated for two-way stop -controlled intersections because not all movements experience delay. In signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections, all movements experience delay and an overall LOS can be calculated. The VTrans policy on level of service is: Overall LOS C should be maintained for state -maintained highways and other streets accessing the state's facilities Reduced LOS may be acceptable on a case -by -case basis when considering, at minimum, current and future traffic volumes, delays, volume to capacity ratios, crash rates, and negative impacts as a result of improvement necessary to achieve LOS C. LOS D should be maintained for side roads with volumes exceeding 100 vehicles/hour for a single lane approach (150 vehicles/hour for a two-lane approach) at two-way stop -controlled intersections. Detailed Synchro LOS worksheets are available in Appendix B. 5.2 1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE RESULTS The Highway Capacity Manual congestion reports within Synchro (v9), a traffic analysis software package from Trafficware, routinely relied upon by transportation engineering professionals, were used to assess traffic congestion at the site driveway. During the weekday PM peak hour, overall delays at the site driveway are projected to increase by approximately 1 seconds in the 2022 Build scenario, and overall LOS A is maintained in both 2017 and 2022, with the addition of project generated traffic. Weekday PM peak hour approach delays on Fayette Drive at the site driveway are projected to remain essentially unchanged and remain at LOS A with the addition of project generated traffic in both 2017 and 2022. Figure 11 presents the LOS results during the weekday PM peak hour. FIGURE 11: PM PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS PM Peak Hour 2017 No Build 2027 Build 2022 No Build 2022 Build Intersections LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c LOS Delay v/c Fayette Rd / Project Drive Overall A 3 A 3 - A 3 - A 4 - EB, along Fayette Dr A 2 - A 2 - A 2 - A 2 - WB, along Fayette Dr A 0 - A <1 - A <1 - A <1 - NB, exiting Site Drive B 11 - B 12 - B 12 - B 12 - SB, exiting plaza drive B 12 B 12 B 12 B 12 W 11 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study 6.0 QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the congestion analysis, estimated average maximum queues were evaluated using SimTraffic.14 With the addition of project generated traffic, queues at the Fayette Drive/Project driveway intersection are projected to increase by one vehicles at the project driveway (Figure 12). Detailed SimTraffic queuing worksheets are available in Appendix D. FIGURE 12: AVERAGE MAXIMUM QUEUE LENGTHS (VEHICLES) PM Peak Hour 2017 2022 No Build Build I No Build Build Fayette Rd / Project Drive EB, along Fayette Dr 0 0 0 0 WB, along Fayette Dr 0 0 0 0 NB, exiting Site Drive 0 1 0 1 SB, exiting plaza drive 2 2 2 2 7.0 SAFETY ANALYSIS 7.1 1 CRASH HISTORIES V Frans maintains a statewide database of all reported crashes along all state highways and federal aid road seginents.13 Crash histories were collected from the VTrans Public Crash Data Query Too116 for the 5-year period associated with the most recent VTrans High Crash Location Report17 (January 2010-December 2014). Within this 5-year period, one crash occurred within design stopping sight distance (155 feet at 25 miles per hour) of the site access point. This crash was from a left turn out of the plaza driveway across from the site access. The US-7/Fayette Drive/McIntosh Avenue intersection is part of a designated VTrans High Crash Location (HCL) segment, which means the actual crash rate observed over the past five years is higher than comparable segments across the state with similar functional classification and traffic levels. Since traffic from this development will have an effect on this intersection, we examined crashes on US-7 within the stopping sight distance (250 feet at 35 miles per hour) of the intersection. One injury and one fatality resulted from the 47 crashes at this intersection. This section is ranked 551 out of 647 sections (lower numbers are more severe). As indicated in Figure 13, crashes in this area occur most frequently when there is more traffic on the roads during the later half of the day. Crashes are more prevalent in the second half of the year although there is no clear correlation between crashes and time of year (Figure 14). The five-year 14 Five hour-long simulations were averaged together to estimate queue lengths. As each run is different, a difference in a few cars should not be seen as significant. 15 This data is exempt from Discovery or tldlnission under 23 U.S.C. 409. 16 http://apps.vtrans.vermont.gov/CrashPublicQuerVTool/ 17 http://vtrans.vermont.gov/sites/aot/fdes/planning/2010- 2014%2OFomial%20High%20Crash%20Location%20Report.pdf 12 1 November 3, 2016 trend does not show any significant change in crash rate over the past five years of available data (Figure 15). FIGURE 13: STUDY AREA CRASHES BY TIME OF DAY n 7 s 6 _ u` 5 0 4 a3 0 Q Q Q Q d Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S o .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N �-1 N M V 0 �D rh W ai O '-1 N '-1 N M V u1 �D r, W M Time of Day FIGURE 14: CRASHES BY MONTH OF YEAR 9 Ln 8 v 7 s c�c 6 � 5 0 4 .0 3 E z 0 ,e Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month FIGURE 15: CRASHES BY YEAR 12 10 V. a L 8 U 0 6 W E 4 Z 7 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year 13 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study About half the crashes are rear end crashes, which indicates that congestion is the major issue driving crashes at this location (Figure 16). No mitigation is recommended in connection with this development. FIGURE 16: CRASHES BY TYPE 30 _ 25 20 15 0 10 o- - - - - - - za dela¢ ae ac �e p z �e �� \a�yy�. JP�Ne �eaa0 \a¢y�. e erg `cp `4ay. t' � r�JO lea Q,. Crash Type 7.2 1 SIGHT DISTANCE OBSERVATIONS As defined in the 2011 publication .A Polig on Geometric Design ofHighwa�,.r and Streets, from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), sight distance is the "the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver.1178 Sight distances of sufficient length are necessary at all points along a roadway to ensure vehicles can safely stop or avoid colliding with potential obstructions or other vehicles on the roadway. Standard practice in assessing intersection safety and operations involves measuring two separate sight distances — stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance. In this section, we examine sight distances at the site driveway on Fayette Drive. Stopping sight distance is the visible distance along a roadway between an advancing motorist and a potential obstacle in the roadway. It is measured from a point representing the approaching driver's eye and a point representing an obstacle in the roadway. Stopping sight distances of adequate length are needed along all roadways, both at and away from intersections, so that drivers travelling at design speeds can react to potential obstacles and safely brake to avoid collisions. Design minimum stopping sight distances are calculated based on factors such as design speed, response times, and grades as reported in the 2011 Polig. on Geometric Design of Higbwag and Streets.19 Intersection sight distance is the distance available along the major road travelled way corresponding vtith the maximum visibility between an advancing motorist on the major road and an "I American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (`,Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3 2. 19 ;American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 3-5. 14 1 November 3.. 2016 entering motorist on an intersecting minor road. It is measured between a point representing the advancing driver's eye above the major road and the entering driver's eye above the intersecting road. The 2011 Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets states that the available intersection sight distance should be at least equal to the required stopping sight distance along the major road, which in this case equals 155 feet. "Sight distance is also provided at inter:rections to allow the drivers of stopped vehicles a sufcient view of the intersecting highway to deride when to enter the intersecting highway or to cross it I'the available sigbt distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major road, then driver:r have srfdent sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. "20 However, when possible it is desirable to have intersection sight distances that exceed the design minimum stopping sight distances in order to offer improved operations, such that major road traffic need not decelerate to accommodate entering traffic. `74owever, in some cases a major -road vehicle may need to stop or slow to accommodate the maneuver by a minor road vehicle. To enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping Sight distances are desirable along the major road. "21 Based on the posted speed limit of 25 mph for Fayette Drive, the design minimum stopping sight distance and intersection sight distances is 155 feet and the ideal target intersection sight distance is 280 feet. On October 19, 2016, we observed sight distances at the site driveway and along Fayette Drive, and found both stopping and intersection sight distances to meet these standards to the south. The distance between the site driveway and Fayette Drive's intersection with US-7 to the north is less than the intersection sight distance for vehicles turning right out of the site driveway, and vehicles can see clear to the intersection. 8.0 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Recent VTrans guidance' defines Transportation Demand Management (TDN� as "a broad set of strategies that strive to either reduce or reallocate automobile travel to achieve benefits such as reduced roadway congestion, improved air quality, reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, reduced parking demand, improved public health for those biking or walking, and reduced commuting and travel costs." This guidance suggests several measures, and combinations of measures, for TDM that help reduce trip generation from new developments. Specifically, these reductions are applied to the expected trip rates computed from Trip Generation as a percentage. 20 American Association of State Highway- and Transportation Officials, _A Pokq, on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 21 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Polly on Geomehic Design of Highways and Streets, Fifth Edition (Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Page 9-29 - March 2016, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Guidance, N'Trans Policy & Planning 0115 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study Relevant measures proposed by the Larkin Terrace development fall into the Physical category, and include: - Project location in a mixed use urban area, and on a moderate service transit line (headways of 30 minutes or less) - A bus stop with a shelter within 600 ft. of the project entrance. - Bicycle racks located conveniently on -site - A site design with connections to adjacent sidewalks and transit stop(s) Per the Wrans methodology, each measure has a percent trip reduction associated with it. The aggregate for this development exceeds the maximum allowed of 6%; thus a 6% reduction was applied. 9.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND TRANSPORTATION OVERLAY DISTRICT The Larkin Terrace development is potentially subject to two separate Traffic Impact Fees from the City of South Burlington and Act 145. The project also has trips that enter an intersection within South Burlington's Transportation Overlay District. This section provides regulators with sufficient information to calculate relevant fees and insure that the development is compliant with the current regulations. 9.1 1 ACT 145 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES Act 145 requires new developments to pay part of the costs of VTrans funded transportation improvements that their trips will impact. Although there are currently no Wrans funded improvements in the project's immediate vicinity, we understand Wrans' policy is to look at the trip distribution and determine if any trips may travel through a location of planned improvements. Figure 17 summarizes the distribution of the 44 new trips to/from surrounding areas. 16 1 November 3, 2016 FIGURE 17: DISTRIBUTION OF NEW TRIPS TO/FROM SURROUNDING AREAS 9.2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IMPACT FEES This City Impact Fee Ordinance levies a Road Improvement Impact Fee for residential developments that increase the number of residential dwelling units or non-residential developments that increase the number of Phi peak hour trips. Since the 54-unit apartment building is replacing the 54-unit all -suites hotel, there is no increase in residential dwelling units. The proposed development is expected to generate 70 non-residential trips. 21 of these are expected to be captured internally for a net creation of 49 non-residential trips At $999.86 per trip, the fee before credits and Traffic Demand Management is $48.993.14. Figure 18 summarizes the projected Road Improvement Impact Fee for the development calculations. This fee does not include credit for past tax payments ($1.97 per $1,000 of assessed value) and future tax payments ($0.39 per $1,000 of assessed value)23. It also does not include credits for any TDhi measures that the development and the Development Review Board or Administrative Officer agree to. 23 City of South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, .?mended May 19, 2014 17 Larkin Realty Larkin Terrace Multi -Use Development Traffic Impact Study FIGURE 18: PROJECTED SOUTH BURLINGTON IMPACT FEE Projected South PM Peak Hour Burlington Impact Fee Total Enter Lxit Apartments (54 units) n/a n/a 0 Specialty Retail Center (18,250 sq ft) 22 28 50 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (2,000 sq ft) 12 8 20 Total 34 36 70 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 10 11 24 25 70 Primary Passby Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 20 23 4 2 49 $999.86 pertrip PM Peak hour Trip End 1 $19,997.20 $22,996.781 $3,999.44 $1,999.72 $48,993.14 9.3 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON TRAFFIC OVERLAY DISTRICT South Burlington restricts traffic from developments that used roadways within its Traffic Overlay District. This parcel is in Traffic Overlay Zone 2C (access to a high -volume roadway via a public roadway or a private driveway with a roundabout or a signalized intersection) and has a budget of 0.75 trips per 1,000 square feet (ks fl2;. \X%ith a parcel size estimate of 110 ksf, it is limited to a maxiinum of 83 trips accessing the US-7/Fayette Drive intersection (Figure 19). This trip budget relates to the total number of trips generated by the site that accesses the high -volume roadway regardless of existing trips. FIGURE 19: TRIP BUDGET SUMMARY Development Parcel 2C 0.75 110 83 *Trips/ksf, based on 30trips per40,000sf Based on background traffic at the site driveway, we estimate that 52.3% of primary trips (35) and all pass -by trips (6) will use the Fayette Drive/US-7 intersection, for a total of 41 trips accessing US-7. This trip generation is less than the 83-trip maximum. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RSG has conducted an analysis of traffic impacts associated with the proposed Lark -in Terrace development located in South Burlington, Vermont. The proposed development would be 54 apartments, a 2,000-squarefoot restaurant, and 18,250 square feet of retail space. The project would 24 South Burlington land Development Regulations. 2016. 10p, p 179, 30 trips per 40,000 square feet 18 1 November 3, 2016 replace an existing 54-unit apartment -style hotel. The site entrance and exit will be on the Fayette Drive approximately 200 feet west of US-7 and aligned opposite an existing plaza access. Key project findings include: TRIP GENERATION We project the proposed development will generate approximately 50 net trips during the weekday PM peak hour. Of this total, we project that 6 trips will be pass -by trips (vehicles already passing by the site on US-7) meaning the development with add 44 trips to the surrounding roads network as shown in Figure 20. FIGURE 20: ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION Projected Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Total Enter Exit Apartments (54 units) 22 12 34 Specialty Retail Center (18,250 sq ft) 22 28 50 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (2,000sgft) 12 8 20 Total 56 48 104 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 14 14 42 34 104 Primary Passby Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 38 32 4 2 76 6%TDM Primary Trip Reduction 36 30 4 2 72 Existing trips 10 12 0 0 22 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 26 18 4 2 W CONGESTION ANALYSIS Traffic along Fayette Drive will continue to experience minimal delays (LOS A) with and without the project. access driveways for both the site and the plaza across the street will maintain LOS B. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented in this report, we conclude that construction of the proposed Larkin Terrace development will not cause unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions on the local roadway network and will not adversely impact the public investment in roadway infrastructure in the adjacent area. 19 11 APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND ADJUSTMENTS {k!\ . � \ ,. .. � PEA, A I _:T: \g Ego E APPENDIX B. TRIP GENERATION PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic ITE Code 220 Apartment Name 0 Number of Studies 90 Size 54 Number of Dwelling Units Average Size of Independent Variable 233 % Enter 65% Range of Rates (low) 0.10 % Exit 35% Range of Rates (high) 1.64 Passby Rate 0% Standard Deviation 0.82 Total TG Prim. Enter Prim. Exit Pass. Enter Pass. Exit 110%AvgRt 0.68 Average Trip Rate 0.62 33 22 12 0 0 rZ 0.77 47 31 17 1 0 0 . Ate -suites Magi Name 0 Number of Studies 5 Size -54 Rooms Average Size of Independent Variable 216 % Enter 45% Range of Rates (low) 0.32 % Exit 55% Range of Rates (high) 0.47 Passby Rate 0% Standard Deviation 0.63 Total TG Prim. Enter Prim. Exit Pass. Enter Pass. Exit 110%AvgRt 0.44 Average Trip Rate 0.4 -22 -10 -12 0 0 rz n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 Name 0 Number of Studies 5 Size 18 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Area Average Size of Independent Variable 69 % Enter 44% Range of Rates (low) 2.03 % Exit 56% Range of Rates (high) 5.16 Passby Rate 0% Standard Deviation 1.83 Total TG Prim. Enter Prim. Exit Pass. Enter Pass. Exit 110%AvgRt 2.98 Average Trip Rate 2.71 49 _F 22 28 0 0 rZ 0.98 65 29 37 0 0 ITE Code 932 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant Name 0 Size 2 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Area % Enter 60% % Exit 40% Passby Rate 43% Average Trip Rate 9.85 rZ n/a Total TG Prim. Enter Prim. Exit Number of Studies 60 Average Size of Independent Variable 6 Range of Rates (low) 0.92 Range of Rates (high) 62.00 Standard Deviation 8.54 Pass. Enter Pass. Exit 110%AvgRt 10.84 20 7 4 5 3 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a J APPENDIX C. SYNCHRO REPORTS HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd 11/2/2016 Intersection Int Delay. s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T* + 4 +T. Traffic Vol, veh/h 42 132 4 6 193 62 7 0 5 38 0 57 Future Vol, veh/h 42 132 4 6 193 62 7 0 5 38 0 57 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 42 132 4 6 193 62 7 0 5 38 0 57 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 255 0 0 136 0 0 483 485 134 457 456 224 Stage - - - - - - 218 218 - 236 236 - Stage 2 - - 265 267 - 221 220 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1322 1461 497 485 920 517 504 820 Stage 1 - - 789 726 - 772 713 - Stage 2 - - 745 692 - 786 725 - Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1322 1461 449 466 920 499 484 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 449 466 - 499 484 - Stage 1 - 762 701 746 709 Stage 2 690 689 755 700 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0.2 11.4 11.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 571 1322 1461 652 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.032 0.004 0.146 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.4 7.8 0 7.5 0 11.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - 0 - 0.5 Larkin Terrace 5:00 pm 11/2/2016 2017 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report r.meuse Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd 11/2/2016 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. Traffic Vol, veh/h 42 132 14 Future Vol, veh/h 42 132 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 42 132 14 4 +T+ *T+ 26 193 62 18 0 14 38 0 57 26 193 62 18 0 14 38 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop None None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 193 62 18 0 14 38 0 57 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 255 0 0 146 0 0 528 530 139 506 506 224 Stage 1 - - - - - - 223 223 - 276 276 - Stage 2 - - 305 307 - 230 230 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1322 1448 464 457 915 480 472 820 Stage - - 784 723 - 735 685 - Stage 2 - - 709 665 - 777 718 - Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1322 1448 414 432 915 453 446 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 414 432 - 453 446 - Stage 1 757 698 709 671 Stage 2 646 651 738 693 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0.7 12 11.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 544 1322 1448 619 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.059 0.032 0.018 0.153 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 7.8 0 7.5 0 11.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) 0.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.5 Larkin Terrace 5:00 pm 11/2/2016 2017 PM Build Synchro 9 Report r.meuse Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd 11/2/2016 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 +T+ 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 138 4 6 203 66 7 0 5 40 0 59 Future Vol, veh/h 44 138 4 6 203 66 7 0 5 40 0 59 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 44 138 4 6 203 66 7 0 5 40 0 59 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 142 0 0 506 509 140 479 478 236 Stage - - - - - - 228 228 - 248 248 - Stage 2 - - - 278 281 - 231 230 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1453 - 480 470 913 500 489 808 Stage - - - 779 719 - 760 705 - Stage 2 - - - 733 682 - 776 718 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1453 431 450 913 481 469 808 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 431 450 - 481 469 - Stage 1 750 692 732 701 Stage 2 676 679 743 691 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.9 0.2 11.7 11.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 553 1306 1453 634 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.034 0.004 0.156 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 7.9 0 7.5 0 11.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - 0 - - 0.6 Larkin Terrace 5:00 pm 11/2/2016 2022 PM No Build Synchro 9 Report r.meuse Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd 11/2/2016 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +1� 4 +T+ +14 Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 138 14 26 203 66 18 0 14 40 0 59 Future Vol, veh/h 44 138 14 26 203 66 18 0 14 40 0 59 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 44 138 14 26 203 66 18 0 14 40 0 59 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 269 0 0 152 0 0 551 554 145 528 528 236 Stage 1 - - - - - - 233 233 - 288 288 - Stage 2 - - 318 321 - 240 240 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1441 448 443 908 464 459 808 Stage 1 - - 775 716 - 724 677 - Stage 2 - - 698 655 - 768 711 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1306 1441 397 418 908 437 433 808 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 397 418 - 437 433 - Stage 1 746 690 697 663 Stage 2 633 641 728 685 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0.7 12.3 12.2 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 527 1306 1441 602 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.034 0.018 0.164 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 7.9 0 7.5 0 12.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.6 Larkin Terrace 5:00 pm 11/2/2016 2022 PM Build Synchro 9 Report r.meuse Page 1 APPENDIX D. SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM No Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB NB SB LTR LTR LTR 19 24 59 6 8 40 26 30 62 542 196 205 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 11 /2/2016 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report r.meuse Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2017 PM Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 24 12 31 59 7 2 12 39 29 16 36 60 542 259 196 205 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 11 /2/2016 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report r.meuse Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM No Build 11/2/2016 Intersection: 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB NB SB LTR LTR LTR 30 18 55 8 7 38 31 28 60 542 196 205 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty. 0 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report r.meuse Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2022 PM Build Intersection: 2: Site Drive/Plaza Drive & Fayette Rd Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summa EB WB NB SB LTR LTR LTR LTR 30 12 31 59 8 2 14 41 31 16 39 63 542 259 196 205 Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 11 /2/2016 Larkin Terrace SimTraffic Report r.meuse Page 1 APPENDIX E. SAFETY DATA Date Time AOT Actual Mlle Point Street Address 1/31/2010 11:22:00 AM 1.13 US-7 (1194 Shelburne Rd.) 2/3/2010 12:19:00 PM 3/5/2010 2:29:00 PM 5/13/2010 5:41:00 PM 6/1 T12010 10:00:00 AM 6/1T12010 1:47:00 PM 7/8/2010 7/15/2010 7/18/2010 9/1/2010 12/27/2010 7/13/2011 10/15/2011 11/10/2011 12/4/2011 3/2/2012 4/6/2012 4/7/2012 6/82012 6/15/2012 9/10/2012 9/11/2012 9/14/2012 9242012 12/152012 3212013 6/10/2013 722013 8/3/2013 8/6/2013 8/82013 9/252013 11/4/2013 11/5/2013 11/52013 12/31/2013 4/102014 6/32014 6/172014 623/2014 7/72014 8/132014 8282014 10/22014 12/10/2014 12/23/2014 12/31/2014 6:57:00 AM 2:42:DO PM 11:17:00 AM 2:59:0o PM 6:06:DO PM 4:56:DO PM 4:16:00 PM 5:47:00 PM 12:58:00 PM 2:55:00 PM 2:07:00 PM 8:19:00 PM 2:25:DO PM 10:54:00 AM 9:30:00 AM 9:21:00 AM 7:46:00 AM 3:05:00 PM 6:02:00 PM 4:53:00 PM 9:16:00 AM 2:07:00 AM 12:00:00 AM 5:40:00 PM 5:03:00 PM 12:40:00 PM 9:55:00 AM 12:40:00 PM 1:09:00 PM 5:50:00 PM 2:50:00 PM 12:31:00 PM 4:30:00 PM 8:43:00 AM 6:01:00 PM 11:04:00 AM 5:11:00 PM 12:14:00 PM 4:55:00 PM 4:08:00 PM 3:23:00 PM 1.18 US-7 1.15 US-7 It 185 Shelburne Rd.) 1.13 US-7 (Shelburne Rd) 1.13 US-7 (1184 Shelburne Rd) 1.12 US-7 (1184 Shelburne Rd) 1.11 US-7 (Shelburne Rd) 1.1 US-7 (1200 Shelburne Rd) 1.08 US-7 (1200 Shelburne Rd) 1.13 US-7 (Shelburne Rd) 1.13 Shelburne Road 1.1 US-7 (11 B4 Shelbume Rd) 1.15 US-7 (1120 Shelburne Road) 1.13 US-7 (1120 Shelburne Road) 1.1 US-7 (1194 Shelburne Road) 1.14 US-7 (Shelburne Rd) 1.18 US-7 (1116 Shelburne Road) 1.13 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.13 RT7 1.13 US-7 Shelburne Road 1.16 US-7 (1125 Shelburne Road) 1.18 US-7 (Front Of 1116 Shelburne Road) 1.13 US-7 Shelburne Road 1.11 US-7 (1185 Shelburne Road) 1.16 US-7 (1125 Shelburne Road) 1.14 US-7 Shelburne Road 1.16 US-7 (1125 Shelburne Rd) 1.16 US-7 (1125 Shelburne Rd) 1.12 US-7 (1184 Shelburne Road) 1.D9 US-7 (1200 Shelburne Rd) 1.11 US-7 (1185 Shelburne Road) 1.14 US-7 Shelbume Rd 1.16 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.18 US-7 (1125 Shelburne Rd) 1.15 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.13 US-7 Shelburne Road 1.18 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.16 1125 Shelburne Rd 1.13 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.13 Shelburne Rd 1.13 Shelburne Road 1.16 1125 Shelburne Rd 1.16 1120 Shelburne Road 1.13 Shelburne Road 1.18 US-7 Shelburne Rd 1.12 US-7 (1184 Shelburne Rd) 1.16 1125 Shelburne Rd Report Number Reporting Agency Light Crash Type City or Town 10SB00717 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB00785 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB01515 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10-3501 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB04536 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB04541 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB05199 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington IOS605457 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Budington 10SBO5551 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB07119 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 10SB10557 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Lighted Roadway Fatal South Burlington 11SB05454 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 11SBOB315 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Budington 11SB09061 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Lighted Roadway Property Damage Only South Burlington 11SB09710 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB01670 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 2012SB2601 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB02632 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Lighted Roadway Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB06963 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB07287 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB011966 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB012036 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB012188 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Injury South Burlington 12SB012744 So. Budington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 12SB016885 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Roadway Not Lighted Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB004058 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB008315 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Budington 13SB009459 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Lighted Roadway Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB011302 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Unknown Crash Type South Burlington 13SB011441 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB011540 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB013958 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB015896 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB015950 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 13SB015952 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Budington 13SB018446 So. Burlington PD. Dark - Lighted Roadway Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB003938 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SBOD6157 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SOOD6756 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 143B006957 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB007678 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB009312 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB009939 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB011320 So. Burlington PD. Daylight Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SBO13970 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Burlington 14SB014523 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Burlington 2014SB014814 So. Burlington PD. N/A Property Damage Only South Burlington Road Characteristics Dir. of Collision Four-way Intersection Rear End Other - Explain in Narrative Rear End Four-way Intersection Same Direction Sideswipe Four-way Intersection Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Parking Lot Rear -to -rear Not at a Junction Same Direction Sideswipe Not at a Junction Head On Not at a Junction Head On Four-way Intersection Opp Direction Sideswipe Four-way Intersection Single Vehicle Crash Not at a Junction Rear End Not at a Junction Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Shared -use path or trail Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Not at a Junction Rear End Not at a Junction Same Direction Sideswipe Shared -use path or trail Rear End Shared -use path or trail Rear End Four-way Intersection Same Direction Sideswipe Driveway Right Turn and Thru, Broadside A< Four-way Intersection Left Turn and Thru, Angle Broadside - v- Parking Lot Same Direction Sideswipe Four-way Intersection Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Four-way Intersection Left Turn and Thru. Angle Broadside - v- Parking Lot Other- Explain in Narrative Parking Lot Rear End Not at a Junction Rear End Four-way Intersection Same Direction Sideswipe Four-way Intersection Rear End Not at a Junction Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Four-way Intersection Rear End Not at a Junction Left Turn and Thru, Angle Broadside - v- Not at a Junction Rear End Not at a Junction Left Turn and Thru, Broadside v<- Not at a Junction Rear End Not at a Junction Same Direction Sideswipe N/A Four-way Intersection Rear End N/A Four-way Intersection Rear End N/A N/A �! N/A 17111 `. 'IN December 8, 2016 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Application for Larkin Terrace Marilyn Larkin c/o Larkin Realty Applicant Dear Mr. Belair In support of Larkin Realty's application for redevelopment of Larkin Terrace at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road, I am submitting the following additional information: Housing Affordability: The subject properties are located in the C-1 Auto district. This district has a base density of 12 units per acre that when applied to the 40.8 acres of involved land yields an allowable density of 489.6 dwelling units. To date, 210 units have been built in the Old Orchard Apartments, which leaves 279.6 units of unused residential density. The proposed reconstruction of Larkin Terrace will draw an additional 54 units of base density from this pool. This leaves 219 dwelling units for the remaining phases of the project without the application of any affordable housing bonuses allowed by the LDRs. It is important to the applicant that the specific source of the project density is defined. While this does not bear directly of the requirements of the ordinance, it is important to the partners and /or other parties with a material interest in the PUD. For that purpose we have submitted Civil Engineering Drawing DP-1 prepared by Krebs and Lansing showing where we would derive the density for the current application. 54 units of density at 12 units an acre would impact 4.5 acres. The applicant expressly defines the acres involved as the original 2.54 acres of the old Larkin Terrace and 2 acres of land at 1195 Shelburne Road. This provides a source of the density without application of any density bonuses or any commercial impact on related parties. The South Burlington Affordable Housing requirements established under Article 18 of the Land Use Regulations only apply in the City Center District at 18-B. Applicability (1) Covered Development: " Except as otherwise provided in this bylaw, the provisions of this section shall apply within the City Center Form Based Codes District..." 550 HinesburgR ,ad I Sufte 1011 South Burttngt¢n, f 05403`1802 H6;r 0272 1 HabEdeau-Archa ects_cora' It is our conclusion that the application to redevelop Larkin Terrace is not subject to the affordable housing requirements of article 18 of the South Burlington Land Use Regulations. The applicant has declined to avail themselves of the affordable housing density bonus because there is already ample density available at the base rate. It should be remembered that the existing hotel / apartments at Larkin Terrace are rented at market rates, and that the existing property does not receive federal development funding, nor is it enrolled in any current housing affordability programs requiring rent restrictions. Consistent with the law, the applicant accepts Section 8 Housing vouchers as appropriate at all of their rental properties. The applicant is willing and eager to help the current residents of Larkin Terrace transition to other housing, but does not want to concede to a requirement not established by ordinance. Shared Parking: Per your request, we have expanded our analysis of shared parking to include all involved lands and uses on the site. This is complicated, but we need to understand the existing shared parking arrangement, and explore the impact of adding the lands n/f of Farrell on this shared parking arrangement. Under the previously approved shared parking analysis, Larkin Terrace had 61 dwelling units and contributed 126 spaces of parking to the overall pool. In the new design, Larkin Terrace will need 184 parking spaces contribute 208 parking spaces to the pool. The attached spread sheet demonstrates that the shared parking will fall within the tolerances set by the LDRs without limiting the rights of any other landowner or lessee within the PUD. View Corridors: The revised package includes views of the project site from the eastern side of Shelburne Road. The purpose of the images was to determine if any significant views of Lake Champlain or the Adirondack Mountains. The presence of the existing buildings at 1185 Shelburne Road, and the significant forestation within the Barlett's Brook Conservation easement obscure any westerly views from this vantage. In my professional opinion, construction of the proposed project will not adversely impact any significant view corridors from the public way. Landscape Values: It has been determined that the applicant cannot take landscape credit for new trees proposed for the Right of way along Shelburne and Fayette Roads. To meet the minimum landscape budget requirement, we propose to provide an equivalent value of plantings adjacent to the storm water retention pond proposed for 1195 Shelburne Road. (See attached detail from Wagner Hodgson.) Fayette Road Elevation: The DRB requested that additional detail / visual interest be added to the Fayette Road exterior elevation. The revised elevation is attached. (we are working on a 3-d image of the revised design and will forward that to you under separate cover.) 550 Hinesburg Road [ Suite 1011 So& Burlington, VT G-g031802 863 Q222, 1 Habideau-,Arrhitects com We look forward to discussing these items in more detail on December 20, 2016, and appreciate your guidance. Sincerely Gregory Rabideau 550 Hine sburq Road I Suit 1011 South BuInguon, VT 05103 1 R02 863 0222 1 Rabideau Archawtsmm -�—k 1 t 1 I 1 ( 1 1 � 1 I 1 I 1 _ { I 1 1 1 IParcel L&M I N/F Olde Orchard Realty Partnership, LP 12 1 ' m I ` I 1 a I � N/F Ferrell I 1 II Parcel B ' 1 1 1 DENSITY Existing 2.54 acres (shaded Larkin Parcel DENSITY: Shading indicates a portion of the Farrell property, II 1 1 I 11 I I I 1 I II I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 Kre0s 8 Lancing CorreuS Engineer:, MeiNc. teH n Street Suite Y01 CT: (B0br. Vr S L T (B02) B7B-0375 F: (80 878 18 medrwk.Esentl1--g— LARKIN TERRACE Route 7, Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT NO. DESCRIPTION DATE DENSITY CALCULATION SITE PLAN t SJEB/geg5/1SJW Sila Baaa 3 t DRAWN BY SLM PROJECT NO KL=15M DATE. 1028116 REVISED SCALE 1- 200' DP-1 Pgen Phaze PRELIMINARY PLAT PERMIT DRAWINGS 1. Palace 9 Cinema 1,000 Seats x .33 space/seat Shared Parking Adj. Factors Weekday vs Saturday Hourly Peak # Required Spaces f (I/) i Summer Weekday 4-6 pm Peak 333 Spaces 55% (July) 60% 110 Spaces Winter Weekday 4-6 pm Peak 333 Spaces 100% (late December) 80% 266 Spaces Summer Weekday 8-10 pm Peak 333 Spaces 55% (July) 100% 183 Spaces Winter Weekday 8-10 Peak 333 Spaces 100% (late December) 100% 333 Spaces Summer Saturday Evening Peak 333 Spaces 92% (July) 100% (8-9pm) 306 Spaces Winter Saturday Evening Peak 333 Spaces 100% (late December) 100% (8-9pm) 333 Spaces 2.1 Larkin Terrace Apartments I-' V / 15 apts. X 2 spaces/unit 39 apts. X 1 space/unit 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces 69 Spaces Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 2.2 Larkin Terrace Small RestaurantI, -,O Spaces 104 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 2,000 sf x 12 spaces/1,000sf �llll W�L104 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces 24 Spaces Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 104 Spaces 304 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 2.3 Larkin Terrace General Retail 18,250 sf x 5 spaces/1,000sf 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces 92 Spaces Shared ParkingAdj. Factors Hourly Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 104 Spaces 104 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 120 Spaces 3. Zen Garden Restaurant (7,128sf) 7,128 sf x 18 paces/1,000sf 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces 129 Spaces Shared ParkingAdj. Factors Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% (8-9pm) 100% (8-9pm) Monthly 98% (July) 95% (late December) 98% (July) 95% (late December) 98% (July) 95% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 95 Spaces 92 Spaces 126 Spaces 123 Spaces 126 Spaces 123 Spaces 4. Artemis Fitness (3,564f) ----61 apts. X 2 spaces/unit 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces 14 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 90% 90% 80% 80% 30% 30% Monthly 65% (July) 95% (late December) 65% (July) 95% (late December) 65% (July) 95% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 8 Spaces 12 Spaces 7 Spaces 11 Spaces 3 Spaces 4 Spaces 5. Proposed Inernet Cafe (2,677 sf) C11?4 50 Seats x 0.5 per seat (tavern) N �n I' 25 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthly 99% 100% 99% 100% 99% 100% Peak # Required Spaces 19 Spaces 15 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 20 Spaces 6. Concentra Urgent Care (8,586 sf medical office) 8,586 sf x 5 spaces/1,000sf 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces 43 Spaces Shared Parking Adj. Factors Hourly 80% 80% 15% 15% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 33 Spaces 28 Spaces 6 Spaces 5 Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces 7. McDonalds 3,500 sf x 12 spaces/ 1,000sf 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces 42 Spaces Shared ParkingAdj. Factors Hourly 60% 60% 50% 50% 50% (8-9pm) 50% (8-9pm) Monthly Peak # Required Spaces 25 Spaces 24 Spaces 21 Spaces 20 Spaces 21 Spaces 20 Spaces 8. Citizens Bank �I �0 2,644 sf x & paces/1,000sf 15 Spaces 15 Spaces 15 Spaces 15 Spaces 15 Spaces 15 Spaces Shared ParkingAdj. Factors Hourly 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Monthly 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) 95% (July) 80% (late December) Peak # Required Spaces 14 Spaces 12 Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces 0 Spaces Total Number of Required Parking Spaces 616 Spaces 761 Spaces 723 Spaces 872 Spaces 836 Spaces 860 Spaces 7 Fayette LLC. - C. H. Partners LLC. To Developmental Review Board —South Burlington Vermont Bill Miller Chair 7 Fayette LLC. / C.H. Partners are abutters to Preliminary Plat Application #SD-16-29. It is difficult at this time to determine all of the relevant matters pertaining to this proposal. Therefore we are observing the plans, proposals and discussion to determine what, how and when it is most appropriate to offer feedback or to ask in depth questions. We did want to comment that although we received the Notice there was no attachment. We have tried to access the application, site plan, and staff notes but so far have had no success. We had time on Friday but it was Veterans Day. We will endeavor to review plans ASAP. Due to the overall size and complexity of the plans and proposals we invite the applicants to meet with our advisors and ourselves so we can best understand the potential impacts. It would be our objective to work jointly on any issues that might come up. So our team is available and very willing to roll up sleeves and join in as constructive a way as possible to contribute to the success of this exciting project. -,c.czt ✓� s K Partners Asst. Manager for 7 Fayette LLC/ C.H. Partners Fax 877-810-0680 7 Fayette LLC. / C. H. Partners LLC P.O. Box 1004 Jericho Center VT 05465 f>yecs@sprynet.com 802-233-0307 . AC 'tML4p 4 p 'IS M WAI NJ F491 -*J -WJIFA 10,101 • • October 28, 2016 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Preliminary Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for preliminary plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 60 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,178 square feet and will feature 54 apartments and 20,250 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited underthis application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 Sou h Burlington, VT 054031802-861-0222 1 Rabideau-A€cbihets.com The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of a flat roof and up to 55 feet for a decorative element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Density: The base residential density for the subject property is 12 dwelling units per acre. The attached plan entitled "DP-1 - Density Calculation Site Plan" prepared by Krebs and Lansing Inc. and dated October 28, 2016 shows where in the PUD the density for this phase is drawn from. The density for this phase is drawn from the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road (former Larkin Terrace) and a two acre portion of the lands of Farrell at 1195 Shelburne Road. Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build -out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. A more complete description of this system is attached. Traffic: The subject property is part of a Traffic Overlay District. The Vermont Department of Transportation conducted a corridor traffic count in the summer of 2016 and so available background data is current. Proposed uses and estimated vehicle trip ends are shown in this table: 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlirgton, VT 054031802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Ardh€tccts.com r !. ected Tri » G en eration PM Peak Flour Total Enter Exit Apartments (54 units) 22 12 34 Specialty Retail Center (18,250 sq ft} 22 28 50 High -Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant (2,GGG sq ft), 12 8 20 Total 56 48 104 Internal Trips External Tips Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Internal vs External Trips 14 14 42 34 104 Primary Passby Total Enter Exit Enter Exit Development PM Peak Hour Traffic 38 32 4 2 76 6% TDM Primary Trip Reduction- 36 30 4 2 72 Existing trips 10 12 Q 0 22 Net PM Peak Hour Traffic 26 18 4 2 so "7DM Guidarcc' ."Irar_, 2v1'c. [Bu_ _.cp withsheIter, Tr-r-itivraIk a-ccess ate desi�r, Ricycle racks, i;'v_ rrax The site will generate 104 trips. 28 of those trips will be captured internally, so 76 trips are projected at the project driveway. We can remove up to 6% for TDM measures, which you accomplish with a bus stop with shelter, transit/walk access site design, and bicycle racks. We also remove the 22 trips from the existing land use (apartment -style hotel), so there is a net 50 trips being added at the project driveway. This parcel is in Traffic Overlay Zone 2C (Access to a high -volume roadway via a public roadway or a private driveway with a roundabout or a signalized intersection) and has a budget of 0.75 trips per 1,000 square feet (ksf). At 110 ksf, it can have a maximum of 83 trips accessing the US-7/Fayette Drive intersection. Note that this trip budget relates to the total number of trips generated by the site that access the high -volume roadway; you do not get credit for existing trips. "D", Phase 1 2C 0.75 110 83 Based on background traffic at the site driveway, we estimate that 52% of primary trips (34) and all pass -by trips (6) will use the Fayette Drive/US-7 intersection, for a total of 40 trips accessing US-7. This is well below the 83 trip max. Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current 2.5 acre site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The project as proposed will include the 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Bvtlirgtrn, VT 054031802-863,0221 Rabiceou .Architects.com construction of new storm water treatment features that will improve water quality in Bartletts Brook and the greater Lake Champlain watershed by upgrading the storm water system to current standards. Fire Protection: We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access. Our analysis shows the required change to be minimal and the plans will incorporate the changes for final plat. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. Please refer to the attached report for details. Parking: Parking is determined by use per Table 13.1 of the City of South Burlington LDRs. The baseline requirement is: One bedroom Apartments 33 1 space per apt. 33 One Bedroom plus den Apartments 6 1 space per apt. 6 Two Bedroom Apartments 15 2 spaces per apt. 30 Small Restaurant 2000 sf. 12 spaces per 1000 24 General Retail: 18,250 sf. 5 spaces per 1000 91.25 Total of base requirement from LDRs 184 spaces Note that because the project includes more than 10 dwelling units, the requirement for additional guest parking is waived per footnote 1 of Table 13-1. Parking Provided: Existing Parking: Proposed parking: Lower Level Parking Lot 83 parking spaces 83 parking spaces Upper Level Parking Lot (s) 43 parking Spaces 72 parking Spaces Garage Parking ---- 53 parking spaces Parking provided on this lot: 126 parking Spaces 208 parking spaces Shared parking: The subject property is part of a previously approved shared parking regime. The last analysis of this shared parking was prepared by Lamoreaux and Dickenson in December of 2013. Of the 620 parking spaces constructed in the PUD, a maximum share of 120 spaces was allocated to the 2.5 acres at 1185 Shelburne Road. The prior analysis counted 61 apartments at the rate of 2 spaces per apartment. 54 apartments — 69 Spaces Restaurant — 24 spaces Retail 91.25 spaces Summer Weekday Winter Weekend PM Peak (Hourly) Evening Peak (85%) 45.9 spaces (98%) 52.92 spaces (75%) 18 spaces (100%) 24 spaces (90%) 81.25 spaces (70%) 63.87 spaces 550 H.inesburg Road ) Suita l0l I South Burlington. Ali 054031802-8863 02221 Rabideau-Architects,cam Total Demand 145.15 spaces 140.79 spaces Base Parking requirement: 184 parking spaces Allowable waiver (25%) (44) parking spaces Adjusted Parking Requirement: 140 parking spaces Actual spaces provided 208 parking spaces Previous shared parking allocation 120 spaces New parking provided 88 spaces Under the current proposal, parking demand will increase over the as -built condition from the 120 spaces allocated to as many as 145 spaces. The project as designed adds 88 parking spaces over the current condition. These newly constructed spaces have not been allocated to any prior phase and so are available to meet the needs of the current phase, with 63 additional spaces available for future phases Set Backs and Coverage: We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet, and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. Building Height: The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. The current building site is very flat with an average pre -construction grade of 202.16 feet. We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 44 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 59 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Conclusion: This has been a collaborative effort involving our design team, the City Planning and Zoning staff and you, the board members who have been reviewing this at the sketch level. It is our goal to create an innovative, pedestrian oriented, mixed use and density environment. The intersection of Fayette Road and Shelburne Road is a major node on the Shelburne Road corridor, and a suitable site for this level of density. We understand that the project requires some waivers of the standards, but in service of a more creative and appealing environment. We appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing these issues in full at our upcoming hearing. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 27 day of October , 2016 , a copy of the foregoing public notice for Preliminary Plat [type of application] 4 SD-16-29 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) See Attached Dated at S. surrington [town/city], Vermont, this 27 day of Octoyer , 2016 Printed Name: Emily Mack Phone number and email: 02) 863 22 Signature: Date:Inir Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Ceriifrcaie ofSen•ice Form. Rev. 1-2012 A PARCEL ID 911# jUnit Street Owner Mailing Address City State Zip 0675-00007 7 FAYETTE RD 7 FAYETTE, LLC P 0 BOX 1004 JERICHO CENTER VT 05465 0675-00010 10 FAYETTE RD L & M PARTNERSHIP 105 APPLETREE POINT RD BURLINGTON VT 05408 0675-00040 40 FAYETTE RD SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISES INC P 0 BOX 1000 PORTLAND ME 04100 0870-000OS 5 HOLMES RD FARRELL DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 0675-00040 189 HANNAFORD DR LOWE'S P 0 BOX 1111 N WILKESBORO NC 28656 1269-00001 1 OLDE ORCHARDL OLDE ORCHARD REALTY PARTNERSHIP LP PO BOX 4193 BURLINGTON VT 05402 1269-00002 2 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00003 3 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00004 4 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00005 5 OLDE ORCHARD L 0675-00022 6 OLDE ORCHARD L 1269-00024 7 OLDE ORCHARD L 1540-01095 1095 SHELBURNE RD KAPSHA PROPERTIES LLC 1095 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01110 1110 SHELBURNE RD JOLLEY ASSOCIATES LLC 54 LOWER WELDON ST STALBANS VT 05478 1540-01116 1116 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELL T 460 21ST CENTURY PARK RD CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 1540-01117 1117 SHELBURNE RD CRE 1V MIXED FIFTEEN NE BRANCH HOLDING P 0 BOX 460049 HOUSTON TX 17056 1540-01120 1120 SHELBURNE RD SPILLANE, LOWELLT & SHELLEY C P 0 BOX 347 NORTHFIELD VT 05663 1540-01125 1125 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP C/O MCDONALE P 0 BOX 447 ESSEX JCT VT 05453 1540-01184 1184 SHELBURNE RD GRANDVIEW FARMS INC P 0 BOX 1304 BURLINGTON VT 05402 1540-01185 1185 SHELBURNE RD LARKIN, MARILYN 410 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTOIN VT 05403 1540-01195 1195 SHELBURNE RD FARRELL, DAVID M TRUSTEE 5 HOLMES RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01200 12001 SHELBURNE RD WILSON, WILLIAM 1200 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-01210 12101 SHELBURNE RD SISTERS & BROTHERS INVESTMENT GROUP L 7S S WINOOSKI AVE BURLINGTON VT OS401 1540-01230 1230 SHELBURNE RD 1220 SHELBURNE RD CORP 1512 LAKE RD MILTON VT 05468 1540-01233 1233 A SHELBURNE RD TWO O'BRIENS PROPERTIES LLC 1475 SHELBURNE RD S BURLINGTON VT OS403 1540-1233B 1233 B SHELBURNE RD FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE Bl SO BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 CO2 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK UN CHARLOTTE VT 105445 1540-1233D 1233 CO3 SHELBURNE RD W & K PROPERTY LLC 1233 D SHELBURNE RD UNIT #3 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 Cl SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD UNIT C-1 SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 JC2 SHELBURNE RD NSL HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE C2 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233C 1233 C3 SHELBURNE RD ALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING ST WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233C 1233 C4 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233C 1233 C5 SHELBURNE RD ROCK DUNDER PROPERTIES LLC 1223 SHELBURNE RD #C5 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 Dl SHELBURNE RD ADAMS, JOHN S & SUZANNE N 126 WHITE WATER CIRCLE WILLISTON VT 05495 1540-1233D 1233 D4 SHELBURNE RD GREEN & COIL LLC 78 CURTIS AVE BURLINGTON VT 05401 1540-1233D 1233 D5 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 1233D SHELBURNE RD STE D 6B S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 ID6 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT OS445 1540-1233D 1233 D7 SHELBURNE RD ARROW TECH ASSOC INC 1233 SHELBURNE RD STE D7 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233D 1233 D8 SHELBURNE RD SOPHER FAMILY LLC 800 CROSSWIND RD CHARLOTTE VT OS445 1540-1233D 1233 09 SHELBURNE RD 1540-1233E 1233 El SHELBURNE RD G & K HOLDINGS LLC 1233 SHELBURNE ROAD UNIT E- S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E 1233 E3 SHELBURNE RD FLOOD, RICHARD W & M TEENA 270 SOARING HAWK LN CHARLOTTE VT 05445 1540-1233E 1233 E4 SHELBURNE RD HILL, MARK D TRUST 1233 SHELBURNE RD E-4 S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E SHELBURNE RD LOWREY, RICHARD L SR & SUSAN 1233 SHELBURNE RD SUITE ES S BURLINGTON VT 05403 1540-1233E SHELBURNE RDALLEN, STEPHEN D & ANITA B 87 E SPRING 5T WINOOSKI VT 05404 1540-1233E d1233ES t SHELBURNE RD SHELBURNE RD I EASTMAN, MARGARET S TRUST 1163 THOMPSONS POINT RD CHARLOTTE JVT 105445 T 6 RabideauArchitects September 28, 2016 South Burlington Development Review Board C/o Mr. Ray Belair South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Preliminary Plat Application- Larkin Terrace John Larkin Inc, The Milot Larkin Partnership, and Eric Farrell representing the David M. Farrell Trust, applicant and co -applicants. Members of the Board, In support of the attached application for preliminary plat, we are submitting the following narrative. The applicant(s) have proposed an extensive re -development of lands at 1185 and 1195 Shelburne Road in the C-1 Auto District. You have reviewed several sketch plans of the master plan for this redevelopment. The application now before you is for the first phase only and generally applies to the land at 1185 Shelburne Road, generally known as Larkin Terrace. It entails demolition of 60 dwelling units currently approved as an extended stay hotel, and replacement with a new four-story plus basement mixed use retail and residential building. The new structure will have a footprint of 21,178 square feet and will feature 60 apartments and 21,178 square feet of commercial / retail space on the ground floor. Parking will be provided in a basement level parking garage and on a surface lot located behind the new building. We seek approval as a Planned Unit Development. The subject property is part of the previously approved L&M Park Planned Unit Development and so this application is an amendment to that underlying plat. This application will incorporate additional land at 1195 Shelburne Road, currently subject of a purchase and sales agreement from the David M. Farrell Trust. Impacts on those additional lands are limited under this application to shared storm water improvements, utility crossings and a limited amount of parking. In order to promote innovative design, and to encourage and more active streetscape, the applicant(s) are requesting the Development Review Board to allow for waivers as allowed by the South Burlington LDRs. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com The waivers required under this application are: 1. Waiver of front yard setbacks to provide a more pedestrian oriented experience. 2. Waiver of Front Yard Coverage limits to allow for walks, seating areas, etc 3. Waiver of building height limitations to allow for 45 feet to the top of a flat roof and up to 55 feet for a decorative element. 4. Reduction in the minimum parking requirement based on the sharing of parking between uses, ready access to a major bus line, and the predominance of one -bedroom units being proposed. Storm water: The current proposal incorporates new storm water improvements that anticipate a full build - out of the master planned project. Run off from roofs and parking areas will be collected in various structures and ultimately routed to a new storm water facility meeting contemporary standards to be located adjacent to an existing pond on the Farrell parcel. This system will provide more and better treatment than the system currently serving the Larkin Terrace Parcel. A more complete description of this system is attached. Traffic: Traffic will access the site primarily from Fayette Road via two curb cuts. The first, a private road will form the central spine of the master planned community and will feature some on - street parking and substantial pedestrian improvements. The second is an existing dedicated R.O.W. that extends southward to the Southerly boundary of the Farrell parcel. This is part of a proposed road connection to Holmes Road required by the City Municipal Development Plan. A third curb cut is proposed for Shelburne Road and will be designated right in right out only. This is a necessary element to preserve access to the Allenwood Estate on the lake. Traffic impacts for the current phase are: Apartments: 60 units at .61 VTE 36.6 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Restaurant: 3,500 s.f. at 11.15 VTE / 1000 s.f. 39.0 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Retail: 17,678 s.f. at 3.37 VTE / 1000 s.f. 59.6 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Total PM Peak: 135.2 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Existing Res. Hotel: 60 units at .59 VTE / Unit 35.4 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Net new traffic Impacts: 99.8 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends We have hired a traffic consultant and will present a more complete traffic analysis for final plat. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Arch itects.com Natural and Historic Areas: There are no significant natural areas or historic features on the current site, which is fully developed. Within the overall PUD there are mapped wetlands and a conservation buffer which protects an un-named tributary of Bartlett's Brook. The work proposed in the current phase will not impact these features. We have met with the South Burlington Fire Department. We understand that the new hydrant being provided in this phase must be within 100 feet of the Fire Department Connection at the face of the building. We further agreed with the department's request that we ease the curb radii at Fayette Road and at the parking lot entrances to facilitate truck access. Our analysis shows the required change to be minimal and the plans will incorporate the changes for final plat. We have recent Fire Flow Field Reports that indicate the water system has sufficient flows and pressures for fire suppression. Please refer to the attached report for details. Parking: Of the 60 apartments proposed, 57 are one -bedroom units, and three are two bedroom units. The required parking is 1 space per DU plus 1 space for every 4 units for studio and 1-bedroom DUs. At this rate 57 one bedroom units require 71.25 spaces. The three two bedroom units require 6 spaces for a total residential demand of 77.25 spaces. We don't currently know what uses the commercial space will house. If the space is all retail, then the 21,178 square feet of commercial space would require 105.8 parking spaces. This sets a base parking requirement of 183 spaces. Parking is provided in two off-street surface lots, an underground garage, and as parallel on street parking on the proposed private road. Total surface parking is 66 parking spaces, and the sub -surface garage holds an additional 53 spaces for a total of 119 parking spaces for this phase. The parking provided is 64 parking spaces fewer than the tabular values from the LDRs, and so we are requesting a parking waiver of 34%. This project site is served by CCTA and a bus stop is shown on the plans. The retail and residential uses complement each other allowing for shared parking. Finally, as the master plan is more fully implemented, additional parking is proposed that will mitigate the size of the waiver required. Dimensional Standards We have previously discussed the goal of creating a more pedestrian oriented, urban style of streetscape. This necessarily impacts the front yard set -back and coverage limits set by the LDRs. In order to allow for the walk ways, seating areas, bus stop, etc. we are requesting a waiver of the front yard set -back from 30 feet to 12 feet, and a waiver of the front yard coverage requirement from a maximum of 30% to 100%. The maximum building height from appendix C of the LDRs for a flat roof building is 35 feet. 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com We have proposed a four story building, with several significant cut outs having two or three story roofs. We are asking for an average roof elevation of 44 feet above pre -construction grade. In addition, in order to animate the roof-scape, we would like to have one significant feature extend to 54 feet as a design statement, similar to a steeple. Conclusion: This has been a collaborative effort involving our design team, the City Planning and Zoning staff and you, the board members who have been reviewing this at the sketch level. It is our goal to create an innovative, pedestrian oriented, mixed use and density environment. The intersection of Fayette Road and Shelburne Road is a major node on the Shelburne Road corridor, and a suitable site for this level of density. We understand that the project requires some waivers of the standards, but in service of a more creative and appealing environment. We appreciate your consideration, and look forward to discussing these issues in full at our upcoming hearing. Sincerely, Gregory Rabideau AIA 550 Hinesburg Road I Suite 1011 South Burlington, VT 05403 1 802-863-0222 1 Rabideau-Architects.com Champlain Water District Record 355 Fire FloNv Field Report City: South Burlington Street : Fayette Road Location Description : Date/Time Tested: 1/12/2015 Tester: TB AR Flow Hvdrant Information Hyd 1: # 39 , Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd l: Static 70 I psi Hyd 2: Static 0 psi Hyd 3 Static 0 psi Hyd 1: Pilot 48 psi Hyd 2: Pilot 0 psi Hyd 3 Pilot 0 psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 ! Hyd 2: OD 0 Hyd 3 OD 0 Hyd 1:C 0.9 Hyd 2:C 0 Hyd 3C 0 Hyd 1: Flow 1162.51 gpm Hyd 2: Flow 0.00 gpm Hyd 3 Flow 0.00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*ODA2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1162.51 gpm Residual Hvdrant Information Hyd I # 40 Hyd 2 # Hyd 3 # Hyd I Static 70 Hyd 2 Static 0 Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd I Res 56 Hyd 2 Res 0 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions : Main Service 78 PSI, Georgia Pacific 97 PSI Allen Road Tanks 36.6', Pump #1 83% at 0.84 MGD Land Use: 850 Supermarket Description Supermarkets are free-standing retail stores selling a complete assortment of food; food preparation and wrapping materials; and household cleaning items. Supermarkets may also contain the following products and services: ATMs, automobile supplies, bakeries, books and magazines, dry cleaning, floral arrangements, greeting cards, limited -service banks, photo centers, pharmacies and video rental areas. Some facilities may be open 24 hours a day. Discount supermarket (Land Use 854) is a related use. Additional Data Caution should be used when applying daily trip generation rates for supermarkets, as the database contains a mixture of facilities with varying hours of operation. Future data submissions should specify a site's hours of operation. The sites were surveyed between the 1960s and the 2000s throughout the United States. Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72, 98, 203, 213, 251, 273, 305, 359, 365, 438, 442, 447, 448, 514, 520, 552, 577, 610 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1572 Institute of Transportation Engineers Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 90 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 233 Directional Distribution: 65% entering, 35% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.62 0.10 - 1.64 0.82 Data Plot and Equation 700 600 500 v, w n F- 400 a� CD U L N 300 iv Q 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.55(X) + 17.65 700 900 900 1000 1100 ------ Average Rate R2 - 0.77 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 329 Institute of Transportation Engineers Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 78 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 235 Directional Distribution: 20% entering, 80% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.10 - 1.02 0.73 uata riot ana tquation 700 6ao ;.... C 500 ''/...� 400 .. ..I ........... (D 4) X coo300 ..... -.--- .X... .. ........ ,....... :................. X Q : X ~ 200 . ..... x .... _?.. ??. .... x : .. ................... X .X )0( X<X X X 100 X.x ...X..?...x X X XX X. X X "X 0- 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.49(x) + 3.73 R2 = 0.83 Trip Generation, 8th Edition 32B Institute of Transportation Engineers Champlain Water District Record 355 lf}3 t7ttr<rrr f'i(e f';rr� <,rt<i Fire Flow Field Report City: South Burlington Street: Fayette Road I Location Description Date/Time Tested: 1 /1212015 Tester: TB AR Flow Hvdrant Information Hyd 1: # 39 i Hyd 2: # Hyd 3# Hyd 1: Static 70 ! psi Hyd 2: Static 0 psi Hyd 3 Static 0 psi Hyd 1: Pilot 48 psi Hyd 2: Pilot 0 psi Hyd 3 Pilot 0 psi Hyd 1: OD 2.5 1 Hyd 2: OD 0 Hyd 3 OD 0 Hyd 1: C 0.9 I Hyd 2: C 0 Hyd 3 C 0 Hyd 1: Flow 1162.51 gpm Hyd 2: Flow 0.00 gpm Hyd 3 Flow 0.00 gpm Flow = 29.83*C*OD^2*sgr(pitot) Total Flow : 1162.51 gpm Residual Hvdrant Information Hyd I # 40 Hyd 2 # Hyd 3 # Hyd 1 Static 70 Hyd 2 Static 0 Hyd 3 Static 0 Hyd I Res 56 Hyd 2 Res 0 Hyd 3 Res 0 System Conditions : Main Service 78 PSI, Georgia Pacific 97 PSI Allen Road Tanks 36.6', Pump #1 83% at 0.84 MGD ray From: Gregory Rabideau <greg@rabideau-architects.com> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 3:01 PM To: ray Cc: Deb Sherman Subject: larkin Terrace Attachments: 1-1.1_Existing Tree Inventory.pdf Ray, 1. The building area info you requested is as follows: First Floor: 20,250 Second Floor 22,183 Third Floor: 21,379 Fourth Floor 20,160 Gross Area 83,972 square feet. 2. The inventory of existing trees to remain is attched 3. Joe Larkin is working with the Farrells to get the signature youy need. 4. Open space comes in may forms. There are three roof gardens in the proposed building. a linear green way that starts on Shelburne road and extends to the west dividing Phase 1 from Phase 2. there is an outdoor eating space shown at the intersection of the two legs of the building and then the entire streetscape development to include planters seating etc. 5. The dumpster is shown adjacent to the loading dock area. I'll ask for a detail. I'll have to ask Krebs and Lansing for the coverage info you need. Wagner Hodgson is doing any lighting and landscape budgets. We thought that estimated landscape costs were part of the final platt application based on the matrix in Appendix E of the LDRs. I will get the other stuff to you as soon as I get it. Thanks Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects Inc. 550 Hinesburg Road, Suite 101 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone 802-863-022 E-mail: greg@rabideau-architects.com PLANTING;: ., Syringa reticulaa'Ivory Silk 23%3" Cal, 4 EA $500,00 $2,000.00 Gleditsa criaanthos'Screet Keeper'- HONEY LOCUST 5"-5.5" 14 EA $Z41K00 $33,600.00 Gleditsa criaanthos'Shademaster' - HONEY LOCUST 5"-S.5" 7 EA $2,400.00 $16,800.00 Acer x Fremanii'Armstrong' - FREEMAN MAPLE 3-3.5" Cal. 7 EA $650.00 $4,550.00 Acer x Fremanii'Celebration' - CELEBRATION MAPLE 3-3.5" Cal. 5 EA $650.00 $3,250.00 Ulmus Americana 'Princeton'- PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 4"-4.5" Cal. 5 EA $1,600.00 $8,000.00 Beculanigra'Heritage';4.5"-5"Cal. 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,500.00 5 Gal. Shrubs (Hydrangea, Lilac) 13 EA $70.00 $910,00 3 Gal. Shrubs (Ninebark, Rose, Sumac) Ito EA $65.00 $7,150.00 Planting Subtotal $83,760.00 Subtotal 5% Contingency *Meets Total Construction Cost of $8 Million ($87,500 Landscape Value Minimum) $83,760.00 $4,188.00 10!5i2016 l SP1 (LED) — Spectra Large Scale TYPE • Reiable, efficient operation • Integral surge protection Configurable pole and arm mounting • Type 2, 3, 4, 5 distributions • 13 standard powder coat finishes • Diffused lens option I • 3000K, 4000K and 5000K CCT IP65 • Scaled family members i • 0-10Y dimming ready Configurable hoods in natural finishes !! : 1. LUMINAIRE 2. HOOD 3. OPTICAL 4. COLOR 5. DRIVE 6. HOOD 7. COLOR 8. OPTIONS 9. MOUNTING p STYLE TEMPERATURE CURRENTI FINISH I I I 1. LUMINAIRE S P 1 Spectra large scale. Slips over a 4'1100mm pole 2. HOOD STYLE F.JKMl10.la• lii.Trrel:ll • lill DBIL 3. OPTICAL SYSTEM Y2-32LED (Type 2) Y3-32LED (Type 3) Y4-32LED (Type 4) Y5-32LED (Type 5) 4. COLOR TEMPERATURE 3K (3000K Warm White) 4K (4000K Neutral White) 5K (5000K Bright White) 5. DRIVE CURRENT (120thw277voll) 550 (57 watts, 6. HOOD FINISH;Opliona/) STS (Stainless Steel) COP (Natural Coppet) 7. COLOR WH Arctic While V6U Verde Blue BL Black CRT Corierr BLT Made Black MAL MatteAtrxninun DS DarkBrorue MG Median Grey DON Dark Green AGN Antique Green TT rilaniurn LG Light Grey WDB WeaMleredBrome RAL PreniumColoi MOB Bronze Matallic, CUSTOM"Coractfactory 8. OPTIONS AD5 SPI adaptor. Designed to slip over a F1127mm 0.0. pole LDL lightly difli4sd lens SCP (Sensor Control Programmable) pole accessory is available to provide occupancy detection for outdoor applications meeting California Title 24. For complete spec sheet and ordering information, visit wow.aalnet/ moducts1senscr control pr aramm,blr 1 9. MOUNTING (Optional) All arms regardless of hood diameter have a 4'1100mm distance from the edge of the shade to the pole centerline or face of the wall. AW M1 Wall plate is 8.5'1216 mm x 4,757120mm SAP1 Pate Mount slips over a 4%100nm pole TAP 1 Pole Mount slips over a 4 1061 nm pole Hood Style A S An(sed (ANG 15'1375mm 307750mrn Flered {FLR) 17 1/2'1438mm 35'1875rTim Stlagnr(B?R1 2.314;544mm 431/2'111.D88mm Double IDBU 213.14•,5AAm 431/2'n.DgBmm AWM1 . 'I', b'3Ytin MRk Teo, Visit www.aainet lorArms. Poles A Acces,spnes SpecificaWn Guide SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING • Luminaire housings shall be cast aluminum, A356 alloy, • Outer lens shall be clear acrylic and sealed to the housing with a molded silicone gasket on the top and bottom. • Vertical struts shall be 316 stainless steel tubing. • All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel. HOOD • Hoods shall be spun from 6061 T-6 aluminum, 316 stainless steel or 110 copper. • Hoods shall have hemmed or beaded edges for added strength. • The underside of all hoods shall be painted a high ref leclancewhite. OPTICAL MODULE • Light emitting diode (LED) assembly shall be sealed to a die-cast anodized aluminum heat sink with an injection molded silicone rubber gasket and stainless steel bezel, IP66. • LED optics shall be injection molded PMMA acrylic and be mounted to a metal printed circuit board with a uniform conformal coating over the panel surface and electrical features. ELECTRICAL • Luminaires shall accept 120 thru 277 50/6OHz input voltage have integral surge protection and wire leads for controls. • Drivers shall be U.L recognized, have a minimum starting temperature of -30°C and have a 0-10v dimming interface with a dimming range of 10-100%. • Drivers shall have a power factor z.90 and THD of s20% at full load with an Inrush current maximum of <20.0 Amps maximum at 230VAC. • Drivers shall not be compatible with current sourcing dimmers, consult factory for current list of known compatible dimming systems • Approved dimmers include Lutron Diva AV'FV, Lutron Nova NPTV and NTFTV, • LifeShieldTM shall be provided with all configurations for added protection in the event of abnormally excessively high ambient temperature conditions. • Surge protector shall be U.L. recognized and have a surge current rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard 8/2OuSec wave and surge rating of 372J. lsw4.3J - *b G, raver M«,..aw�+ ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING iFJOB architecturai 16565 East Gate Ave. i City of Industry I CA 91745 ! TYPE arealicgiltirtcg P626.968.5666 I F626.369.2695 I www.aal.net NOTES Copyright @ 2013 Rev 2,15 I 1 I • Four hood styles (except indirect) and four tens elements, two natural finishes to configure a took in harmony with your architecture • Symmetric or asymmetric distribution ORDERING INFORMATION SP1/SP2/SPB 1- Large Scale - Slips over a 4" O.D. pole SPS Spectra large scale Small Scale - Slips over o 3" O.D, pole _ SP2 Spectra small scale Bollard SPB Spectra i bollard with ] painted shade Distribution (Class 2, 120 thru 277 vott), Y2, Y3, Y4, IES Type Y5 '2, 3, 4, 5, j 32LED-3K Warm White 3000K diodes ( 32LED-41KNeutral White 4000K diodes 32LED-9K . Bright Whyte 32LED-3K Warm White 3000K dipde, 321LED-4K Neutral White _ 4000K diodes j 32LED-5K' Bright White mmi 5000K diodes !. Baths onver _ 550 , 550 mittiamp j drive current AN6 I Angled hood _...._-. P ............... _. FLR dared hood STR . Straight hood .� DOL. : Double hood IN D .Indirect Type 3 IND-FCO ~Indirect-Futt Spectra ® Large/Small/Bollard • Post -top, wall mount arm, or pole mount arm options • Stainless steel struts • Powder coat finish in 13 standard colors with a polymer primer seater " Not available with DlstrbutonY2, Y3, Y4, Y5 fC0 opttont .............- - Color 132LED-3_K STS "iStainless steel Temperature 6-4K -- -- --.... -_ .32tE i !COP ;Natural copper 32LED 5K I For indirect, all hoods have the underside Driver 550 (550mA, 57 °finishedin high wand reflectance white. 18 LED array, 20.9 watts. 120 thru 277 I `•e"' tnr k- volt Symmetric distribution. j WH ! Arctic White 18LED BW I Bright white,(5000K). ; RL Black S8LE6-NWNeutratwhite BLTIMatteBlack (4000K).. DGN i Dark Green _ 18LED-WW ' Warm white (3000K), ' DB Dark Bronze TEED array, 12.2 watts. 120 thru 277 volt Asymmetric distribution. TT Titanium 9LED-BW Bright white (5000K). ; WDB ;Weathered Bronze --- 9LED-NW ':. Neutral white I - .............-MOB (4000K)• j Metallic Bronze 9LED WW :Warm white (3000K) ' VBU jVerde Blue SPB:= �. CRT Corten _....._ ULS Upper lens shield. Reduces tight . above hood. For "Indirect models only. ADS Adaptor for SP1, slips over a 5"O.D. pole. AD4 Adaptor for SP2, slips over a 4"0.D. SCP (Sensor Control Programmable) pote accessory is available to provide occupancy detection for outdoor applications meeting California Title 24. For complete spec sheet and ordering information, visit www.aal.netl g_roducts/sensor control programmable/ 12 LED array, 14.8 watts. 120 thru 277 1 MAL : Matte € ;volt Symmetric distribution. i .._.,_._._.._-..._.._... ..Aluminum 12LED-BW Bright white (5000K). ' MG Medium Grey 12LED NW j Neutral white AGN Antique Green . ...... _ ^^ (4000K). LG Light Grey 12LED-WW Warm white (3000K). RA!/ : provide a RAL rt 6 LED array, 8.0 watts. 120 thru 277 1 PREMIUM 4 digit color volt. Asymmetric distribution. COLOR I number 6LED HW Bright white (5000K) i-CU§ioA ease provide BLED -NW Neutral white COLOR color chip for (4000K). j matching --- BLED-WW ;Warm white (3000K). ! DIMENSIONS GLA Frosted glass diffuser. Type 5 Light Pattern. for SP2 only. 5P2 SP2 VL3 i Asymmetric SMALL Yi S Symmetric EPAGE1.13 I EPA - 0.68 WT. 22.5 ibs LOL i' Lightly diffused WT 41.5 lbs ' tens for Type 5 ...,....._._._.. t AWM 1 I Wall mount farm SAPS Arm mount. Designed to slip over a 4' dia 0 D, pole. TAPS Twin arm mount Designed to slip over a 4" dia O.D, pole. AWM2I Wall mounted :arm SAP2 ; Arm mount. Designed to slip over a 4" TAP2 Twin arm mount. Designed to stip over a 4" dia pole. SPB OAH: 42"° Hood diameter: 12.75" Boats: 0.5" x 10" Wt: 28.5 its TIP: 65 X212' ar Fop Vie" tt#GGtitr�l �ZI'flihlNrT 335 SP1 (LED) -- Spectra Large Scale I TYPE CONTROLS • SCP shall have an integral surge protection device with a currentt rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard 8/20uSec wave and sure rating of 372J • Sensor not intended for use with additional photo -control, wireless control or dimming systems. SERVICING • The electrical assembly shall be mounted to a prewired internal service tray and accessed by loosening two captive bolts and lifting off the top of the luminaire. ARM AND POLE MOUNTING • The pole mounted arm for a single fixture (SAP) and pole mounted arm for two fixtures at 180a (TAP) shall have a cast aluminum post top and fixture fitter with two round horizontal stainless steel bars. • The post titter shall slip over a 4*/100 min pole and be secured with six stainless steel set screws. • The wall mounted arms for a SP1 fixture shall have a cast aluminum wall plate, cover and fixture fitter with two round horizontal stainless steel bars. The cover shall secure to the wall plate with four stainless steel set screws. FINISH • Luminaire finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off, and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. • Luminaire finish shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. CERTIFICATION Luminaire shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use, UL1598. UL 8750 and Canadian CSA Std. C22.2 no.250. IP65. WARRANTY / TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE Download: httpaiwww.hiibhelll ting."mirecnurceclwarrantyI AAL reserves the right to change product specifications without notice. DIMENSIONS > 7,305 mm 2!e-s1741 mm i i 4.75- , ,1sr� SPi HEIGHT 29 67741mm WEIGHT 4<ibs Angled Hood (ANG) Flared Hood (FLR) StralOht Hood (STR) Double Hood (DBL) DIA: 227559mm DIA: 27'1686mm DIA 31 5'1601mm DIA- 31.5"1801mm EPA: 1.08 EPA: 1.1 EPA: 1.08 EPA, 1.13. PERFORMANCE DATA (32 LEDS, 550 MA DRIVE CURRENT, 57 WATTS) TYPE LENS 5K — I -- --- 4K 3K AMPS* 120YAC AMPS) 277VAC LUMENS LPW e U G 1 LUMENS LPW B U G LUMENS LPW B U G Y2 4129 72A 1 12 1 3948 69.3 1 2 1 3041 53 � 1 2 1 Y3 Clear 3964 6915 1 2 11 3790 66.5 1 2 1 2920 51.2 1 2 1 Y4 (std.) 4177 73.3 1 2 1 i 3994 70.1 1 2 1 3077 54.0 1 2 1 1 0.5 1 0.2 Y5 3807 66Z 2 2 1 3640 63.9 2 2 1 2804 49.2 2 2 Y2 3461 60.7 1 2 1 3323 58.3 1 2 1 2549 44.7 1 2 Y3 LDL 3268 57,3 1 2 1 3138 55.1 1 2 1 2407 42.2 1 2 1 Y4 3486 61.2 7 2 1 3347 58.7 1 2 1 2567 145.0 11 1211 Y5 3195 56.1 2 2 1 3068 53.8 2 2 1 2353 41.3 1 1211 CCTAVERAGE 5000K 4000K 3000K CRI MINIMUM s70 s70 a80 SP 1-FLR-Y5-32LED-5K-550 IES files can be found at wwwaalnet SP 1-FLR-Y3-32LED-5K-550 25-C177•F 1 100% 1 96% 1 94% 1 93% 1 90% 1 160,000 40-C1104°F 1 100% 1 94% 1 91% 1 90% 1 86?U 1 160,000 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING JOB architectural 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 TYPE arealeghting P 626.968.5666 1 F 626,369.2696 1 www.aaLnet NOTES Copyright C 2013 Rev 2.15 1 2 1 SP2 - Spectra""m Small Scale I TYFE • Four hood styles and four lens elements to configure a look of harmony with your architecture • Symmetric or asymmetric distribution • Post -top, wall mount arm, or pole mount arm options • Tool -less access with captive fastener • Adaptable appearance is perfect for contemporary or traditional installations • Stainless steel struts • Powder coat finish in 13 standard colors with a polymer primer sealer 1. HOO Eo ELEMENT 13. LAMP/BALLASTI 4FHOOHD ( 5. COLOR I 6. OPTIONS 1. HOOD STYLE (HT 292',740mm, EPA:2.27 WT 461tis) ANGLED FLARED STRAIGHT DOUBLE ANG FLR STR DBL INDIRECT (NotforLED) IND (Type 3) IND (Types) IND - FC0 (Full cutoff) 2. LENS/ELEMENT FROSTED GLASS DIFFUSER GLA GLASS REFRACTOR (Not for LED) GR3 (Type 3; GR5(Type5) LIGHTLY DIFFUSED LENS (Not lorLED) LDL (TypeS) GLA GR3 GR5 LDL 3. LAMP/BALLAST LM (120 thrn 277 volt) Svmmeldc oFstrilidion. 209 wails 16LED'BW (5000KCCT) 16LED-NW (40 (SLED-WN/ (3000KCCT) Asymmetric distribution. 122 watts 9LED-BW (5100KCCT) 9LED-NW (42 9LED-WW (3000KCCT) COMPACT FLUORESCENT (120thro277volt) CF (Specify 26, 32, or 42 watt lamp.) METAL HALIDE (1201277voll) Medium base, ED-171amp 50MH 70MH 10OMH G 12 base, T-6 ceramic lamp 7OMHT6 ELECTRONIC METAL HALIDE (120thru277vof0 Medium base, ED-17/amp 5OMHEB 70MHEB 10OMHES G12 base, T 6 ceramic lamp 70MHTSEB OOK CCT) 5. COLOR WH ArcflcVlhite VBU Verde Blue BL Black CRT Corlen BLT Matte Black MAL Made Aluminum DB Darkftree MG medhum Grey DGN OarkGreen AGN Antique Green T7 Titanium LG LigghtGrey W DS Weathered Bronze RAL Premium Color MDB Bronze Metallic CUSTOM * • ConlaciFactory 6. OPTIONS 347 (347 volt ballast 120 V,,/347. Not available with electronle ballast) AD4 (SP2 adaptor Designed to slip over a 4%rOGtnm O.D. pore) ULS (Upper lens shield in the upper lens area. Provides cutoff optics (1:2% uptight). Indirect only. only available for iNO3 & INDS) LDL (Lightlydiliusedlerts) 7. MOUNTING SCP (Sensor Control Programmable) pole accessory is available to provide occupancy detection for outdoor applications meeting California Title 24. For complete spec sheet and ordering information, visit www.oal.net/ groductsl5enaer con�rolornaMmmablelcontrolornaMmmablel 7. MOUNTING All arms regardless of hood diamekr, have a 47100mm distance from the %ge of the shade to the pole centerline or Lace of the wait. WALL MOUNT AW M2 (Wall plate is 6.3757162mm x 3.5'189mm WT.51bs. EPA:0.11) 1KCCT) POLE MOUNT SAP (Single -Wt.,91bsEPA:.63) TAP2 (Twin -WY: 121bs EPA .83) Post Top Mount (Slips over a 3'175mm polo) HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM (120,`20812401277volt) Medium base, ED-11 tamp 501"IPS 70HPS 1001IPS Air ballasts are bictmy wired lor217 volts. unless specified I amps not included 4. HOOD FINISH (OPTIONAL) lioodlinish wlli rpatch luminaire finish unless selecting orieof these options. Mood u0srde is unfinished to develop a patina. STS (Stainlessstoet) COP (Nanraicopper) AWM1 rw•a sty,. • s in¢,:a:Al:G ty"i3u9.^. N'�iR3zm Pi. FiP,! �. lci 25138 . fig 8� mm i r nell .. rr .. nRi�"gig is �v_�zea—"'! 5'i*Smn: CS8'rtC mm.v ?:'Zi �wr. ruse A j 9 I SAP2 tAP2 Slip over a 47100 mm Slip over a 4'1100 mm D.D. pole D.D. pole Visit www. aat net for Arms Pates: & Accessories ,ST Gg�•Lttienn tsitf 0-111111111111111111- ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING architectural cl 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 areali htinrg P626.96&5666 1 F626,369,2695 1 wwwealAet Copyright @ 2012 1 REV 2,15 HOUSING The fixture housing shall be all cast aluminum, A356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials, or cosmetic fillers, The ballast shall be mounted internally and accessed by loosening two captive bolts and lifting off the top of the fixture, The top cover shall be hinged and secured with one captive too! -less fastener for relamping, The top shall seal with a molded silicone gasket. The upper reflector cone shall be matte finished anodized aluminum. The lens shall be clear seamless acrylic sealed to the housing with a molded silicone gasket on the top and bottom, The vertical struts shall be 316 stainless steel tubing. All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel. All female threads on the aluminum parts shalt be cast -in -place brass inserts to ensure no thread seizure. HOOD The hoods shall be spun from 6061 T-6 aluminum, 316 stainless steel or 110 copper. The shade shall have hemmed or beaded edges for added strength. The underside of the painted shades and all indirect shades (of aluminum, stainless steel or copper) shall be painted a high reflectance white. Stainless steel and copper shade shall be unfinished on both sides, exceptfor the indirect (IND) models. Stainless steel hood not available with FCO model LENSES/ELEMENTS All lenses shall be molded, seamless high impact lighting grade acrylic. The GLA element shall be frosted borosilicate glass with a twist on connection to the lower cone assembly. The cone shall be matte finished anodized aluminum. The GR3 and GR5 shall be precision molded borosilicate glass refractors with the Type 3 or Type 5 distribution. The refractors shall be mounted to a gasketed aluminum Wider with an internal pressure plate. The LDL lens shall be acrylic with a lightly diffused internal finish. The IND indirect fixtures shall have a clear acrylic lens with a lower reflector cone and an upper diffusing cone. JOB TYPE NOTES See next page I 1 I SP2 - Spectra,''I Small Scale { TYPE The one-piece hood and lens shield provides IES full cutoff classification meaning there is zero light emitted above 90' horizontal. The lens shield is aluminum and painted to match the fixture color (IND-FCO only.) ELECTRICAL The ballast shall be integral to the fixture, mounted on a prewired module with a quick disconnect plug. The ballast module shall have keyhole slots and be removable by loosening two screws. Sockets shall be pulse rated porcelain. HID ballasts shall be high power factor, rate for -30°C starting. The compact fluorescent ballast shall be electronic for use with 4 pin lamps (GX24q-4 socket) rated for -18•C starting temperature. CONTROLS • SCP shall have an integral surge protection device with a currentt rating of 10,000 Amps using the industry standard 8120uSec wave and sure rating of 372J • Sensor not intended for use with additional photo - control, wireless control or dimming systems. FINISH Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off, and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. The finish shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. ARM AND POLE MOUNTING The pole mounted arm for a single fixture (SAP) and pole mounted arm for two fixtures at 180° (TAP) shall have a cast aluminum post top and fixture titter with two round horizontal stainless steel bars. The post fitter shall slip over a 3'175mm pole and be secured with six stainless steel set screws. The wall mounted arms for a SP2 fixture shall have a cast aluminum wall plate, cover and fixture titter with two round horizontal stainless steel bats. The cover shall secure to the wail plate with four stainless steel set screws. CERTIFICATION Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for Outdoor, wet location use. UL1598 and Canadian CSA Sid. C22.2 no.250. WARRANTY / TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE Download: httc11wwwhuhhelltiq hting. rom/resourr p,,Iwarrantvl MI fesrrves the fight t0 rlwnge ftadact sj v,;# #r0fis witlrout notice, 7 51191 mm DIMENSIONS `-�- f- 23 37610 mm i U Arr ied Hood (ANG) Flared Hood tFLRS Straight Hood (STR) LSIA; !67407mm D1A:22.5'1572mm DIA:23..i1597mm L_ Indirect (IND Type 3/Type 5) Indrect-full cutoff (IND -FCO) Double Hood (DEL) D1A: 31.57801mm DI A: 32'/813mm DIA• 23 5'1597mm SP21ND3 911 U3 G2 FORWARD LIGHT FL 30• 4.0% FM 60' 8.0% FH 60' 3.5 % FVH 90' 0.7• BACK LIGHT BL 3o' 3.7% BM 60` 7.8% BH 80' 4,5% BVH 90' 1.2% UPLIGHT UL 100' 1.3% UH 1801 4.7 % SP2 18LED BW B1 U3 31 FORWARD LIGHT FL 3T 3.2% FM 60' 17.61. FH 80° 16.8% FVH 90` 7.1% BACK LIGHT BL 30" 3.2% BM 60' 17.6% BH 80' 16.8% BVH 9C" 7.1% UPLIGHT UL 10o" 8.2% UH 180' 2.6% WATTAGE: 123 LUMEN OUTPUT: 3337 EFFICACY: 69.1 LUMEN 338 676 29561 / �\ 311 664 383 100 100 0.1 o.oe o.ox 113 398 20' MOUNTING HEIGHT WATTAGE: 20.9 LUMEN OUTPUT: 1116 LUMEN ( p, 36 196 187 79 r o, i 36 ; -a196 II 1 i I 187 79 91 20' MOUNTING HEIGHT 29 IES files Can he Lund of www.aaLnef ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING architectural 16555 East Gale Ave. I City of Industry I CA 91745 arealighting P626.968.5666 1 F626.369.2695 1 www.aai.net Copyright C 2012 I REV 2.15 Mounting Height Multiplier 10 4.000 15 1,778 20 1.000 25 0.640 30 0 444 35 0.327 40 0.250 45 0.198 50 0,160 UPLIGHT 15.3% DOWNUGHT 84.7% EFFICACY: 53.4 Mounting Height Multiplier 10 4 000 15 1.778 20 1.000 25 0.640 30 0.444 35 0.327 40 0.250 45 0,198 50 0 160 UPLIGHT 10.7% DOWNLIGHT 89.3% 2 1 ray From: Lindsey Britt Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 9:41 AM To: ray Subject: Larkin Terrace missing stuff Hi Ray, This is my list of missing stuff: • Lighting cut sheets • Landscaping: budget, planting details, identify plants, etc.; basically comply with Section 13.06 • Calculations for parking island green space • Dumpsters, snow storage (maybe they're on there, but it's so busy I couldn't find them) • What existing vegetation will be preserved • Do they need to have construction schedule if it's only one building? • What's counting as open space and how big is it? Lindsey Britt, MRP Development Review Planner 802-846-4138 Ibritt@sburl.com Department of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 www.sburl.com Larkin Terrace Wagner Hodgson Landscape Architects 10/18/16 • Plantings along Shelburne Rd are in the State of Vermont Right of Way and are not maintained by the City of South Burlington. Should check with the Agency of Transportation regarding plantings in their Right of Way. • Would not recommend under planting shrubs and perennials along Shelburne Rd. This is where the snow and salt from 3 lanes of traffic and the sidewalk will end up • Any areas where trees are to be planted that are currently under pavement require soli replacement or soil restoration to a minimum depth of 2 feet to support tree growth • Elms in the western island should be relocated to take advantage of the larger soil volumes on the western side of the island • Due to their inherent tight branch structure, 'Princeton' Elms may pose structural problems as they mature, requiring pruning on a regular basis to reduce the potential for branch failure. For this reason a substitute species may want to be considered ray From: Craig Lambert Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:12 AM To: ray Subject: RE: Planting Schedule for 1185 Shelburne Road I've looked at the plans and there are no planting details and the tree species and locations aren't specified. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist 104 Landfill Rd South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802-658-7961 Fax: 802-658-7976 email: clambert@sburl.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. -----Original Message ----- From: ray Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 8:47 AM To: Craig Lambert <clambert@sburl.com> Subject: RE: Planting Schedule for 1185 Shelburne Road The plans were sent a while ago, check with Dave or Justin as they may have the plans. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. -----Original Message ----- From: Craig Lambert ray From: Gregory Rabideau <greg@rabideau-architects.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:04 AM To: ray Cc: Deb Sherman Subject: FW: Larkin Revisions for Ray Belair Attachments: L_1.3_Planting Details and Specs..pdf; 1-1.2_Planting Details and Specs..pdf; L1.0_Layout and Grading.pdf; L2.0_Larkin Planting Plan.pdf Ray, Here is the open space info you requested. I'll bring hard copies when I come over at 11 today. Gregory Rabideau AIA Rabideau Architects Inc. 550 Hinesburg Road, Suite 101 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Phone 802-863-022 E-mail: greg@rabideau-architects.com From: Michael McCormick[mailto:mmccormick@wagnerhodgson.com] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:15 PM To: greg@rabideau-architects.com Cc: Deb Sherman (DebSherman@larkinrealty.net); Joe Larkin (joelarkin@larkinrealty.net); Bill Nedde (Bill.Nedde@krebsandlansing.com); Skip McClellan (skip.mcclellan@krebsandlansing.com); Jeff Hodgson Subject: Larkin Revisions for Ray Belair Hi Greg, I've attached our missing revised submissions for the Larkin Terrace application. I sent the lighting cut sheets and landscape estimate last week. The estimate has changed slightly, and it is attached to the planting plan ... let me know if you need me to send it as a standalone document. Other slight change of note: In order to meet the 10% "landscaped islands" requirement for the parking lot, we increased the lot width in order to accommodate a larger, 6' wide island in the center. My original calculations included some spaces adjacent to the lot in order to meet the 10% (which wasn't completely accurate), so we needed to add the center island to meet the threshold. We're just a hair over 10% now, with no loss to parking spaces. I am unable to attend the meeting on Wednesday, but Jeff will be there. Bill and Skip, I can send our revised CAD so you can update your set. Thanks, Michael Michael McCormick southburting-tati PLANNING & ZONING October 21, 2010 Dulcey Mastrangelo FairPoint Communications 800 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on October 19, 2010 (effective 10/19/2010). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7010 0290 0000 2215 3439 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.shuri.com Interested Persons Record and Service List E <I UNT Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: _(/ TO [ % 9610 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAILING ADDRESS yr PROJECT OF INTEREST )/1 SIP 10.6 9 U. ✓CV4 i Ito j Lc,- r �� ►gyp �- (,�1� 5PO L� L S �- i0b i (P } f south ur .1 f.vt-�'N PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board CC: FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, Associate Planner RE: Agenda #4, Telephone Operating Co of VT, #SP-10-67 DATE: October 12, 2010 Telephone Operating Company of Vermont, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking site plan approval to add a utility cabinet on a 8.5 ft. X 8.5 ft. concrete pad, 1185 Shelburne Road.The application shall be reviewed pursuant to Section 13.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The criteria are outlined below: A. General Requirements. In any district, the Development Review Board may grant site plan approval for the construction of a utility cabinet, according to the following regulations. B. Specific Standards for Utilitv Cabinets and Similar Structures. (1) The facility shall serve the City of South Burlington and/or immediately adjacent communities. (2) The minimum required lot for a public utility cabinet, substation, or communication relay station may be reduced from the zoning district requirements, at the discretion of the Development Review Board. In the event that the facility shall be erected on property not owned by the utility, the Development Review Board shall require that the facility be located unobtrusively. (3) If the parcel containing the facility is landlocked, there shall be a recorded easement or permission granting access to the utility or owner of the facility. (4) There shall be suitable fencing to protect the public and sufficient landscaping with evergreens of sufficient height and density to screen effectively the facility from surrounding property. (5) There shall be adequate off-street parking for maintenance, service, or other vehicles. (6) The location of the facility shall be shown on all relevant site plans. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tal 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com (7) The Development Review Board may require setbacks or attach other conditions in order to prevent any hazard to the public or noise nuisance to surrounding property. Utility cabinets shall respect the front yard setback requirements for the zone in which they are located. However, the Development Review Board may reduce the required setback upon determination that such a reduction would not materially affect the maintenance of public rights -of -way. (8) A facility that would be a nuisance to surrounding properties due to smoke, gas, heat, odor, noise, or vibration shall not be permitted in any district. Staff believes that the above have been met. The cabinet is to be used to service the subject property and is to be adjacent to a pad which already exists. The applicant is proposing to enclose the two pads with a 6 foot high, solid white vinyl fence (photographs included). The applicant is also proposing to surround three sides of the pad with 3 foot tall shrubs (see attached plan). Staff does not recommend any changes to the proposed plans and recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan #SP-10-67. • i t r31"*1 RR F9 is d tf R! lu q r 11bit-as L./L1.itiIJRy RR Ltl as as dam Im R71 cy Ry N Rl.O Ra LJom as as as to �0 I'm CS M - d N N N 6 B 69 ©f7'07 .8y toter/: i t. 1 1 R y wo Im 0 [i iy •Cf [ y r y W CA tv il� R7 R7. L,M Fa 6! �R.L R y o y Ra 17 [7 Kt 0�1. }aR �!•. %O 07 O is O 27 L7 Zy eo Rq RH omI, rey tl O uy is to RU 6y 4y Ra of � � to , � � � +� . • '!. • - �"� • � :' � '-; !F ' , N 1 � .-1 i• B . I M _ �•+ ��� N _ , _. ram, . . 't' .._ • '+1s._ I w 2 t .- •I f LA4R V- N AFkR" 15A FAIRPOINT LARKIN TERRA PROJECT L I3�u�►� AW AF.r-: 3PV6 H F�XI&TI N C? NcKTtI OIRN c.51!zV T55 Zp` x_30 + ...ram A, rA X 8� Err rA� r�a0T� 4�` i. D F/kNP(.S( 6' TA-) PLANT LIST EXISTING TREES KEY COMMON NAME i 1 CRABAPPLE i 2 BOXELDER 3 ASH 4 NORWAY MAPLE ADDITIONAL PLANTS i NUR MATURE SERY HEIGHT BLOOM/FOLIAGE/ KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY (H X W) INTEREST TREES/SHRUBS NARROW, COMPACT THUJA PYRAMIDAL EMERALD GREEN OCCIDENTALIS 8-1.5' X EVERGREEN WITH A ARBORVITAE 'SMARA41Y �}� 16 3-5" LUSTROUS FOLIAGE t TITLE: t41 I LARK► L 6c4r address: 1195 -SH-ELg U !RN F Tz 60u v .0 N6 Tou VT 13cwe: V9 It -- 1 /t — 0 t! p date: I — ZD — 2010 sit-vl/- �Jom A &N-1 - 69-9 - 3 68y- RS rAW11m)-D-ENE li 61 .i I SUPPLY COMPANY 472 Marshall Avenue, I Ilistoiy Vermont 05495 802.658.2433 s�F�LFUi�i�� ROAD Site Plan Application Permit Number SP-- `e I APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): _SOlxr, k1grK.in .410 S v,r-►-.1Z IPA . 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)- 33 (o 'y-37 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone an fax #): a,n � -�p5yd3 4. CONTACT PERSON (p rson who will rece�jvg all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): It'I, 5�00 9IkVe,'1 urO4 12s iir' I u,C) 054 -? a. Contact e-mail address: 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRES: 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1540 - Of I gS 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION r"'L a. General project description (explain what you want apprpval for): / 1 Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) " Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES Oa. Building (including interior renovations): $ rr� - b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out),00U f%on� hgger b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 0k() + C +J c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 505'-/03���Ur 2-00 S�I,v3oi \ Site Plan Application b. Existing UsQs on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on uses to remain): (include description and size of each new use and existing d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Co 3. qLv tuS l sq f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing % / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing _% / Proposed % sq. ft. 2 sq. ft. Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the be of mknowledge. SIGNATURE OF P4PP SIGNATUR F PROPERTY Do not write below this line RINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1//' f ld REVIEW AUTHORITY: L� Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: L�Complete, ❑ Incomplete rector of Planning & Zoning or Designee 7 Date 5 r /P do ►ISM 1, southburlingtort PLANNING & ZONING October 5, 2010 Dear Property Owner: Attached to this letter is a copy of the draft agenda for the October 19, 2010 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The agenda includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sinc , aymo J. Bel it Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com - - Ax, jt- Lik , � ... . MN., I Traffic will only be during construction and then once a month maintenance checks. Other information applicable to this application: Proposed landscaping will be a white picket fence as well as other requirements by South Burlington's Development Review Board or Administrative Officer. South Burlington's Zoning Regulations — effective January 2010 would define this project as a ... Utility cabinet. This generic term shall encompass electric transformers, switch boxes, telephone pedestals and telephone boxes, cable television boxes, traffic control boxes, accessory telecommunications transmission equipment and storage sheds, substation, or communication relay station, and similar devices. Telephone Operating Company of Vermont, d/b/a FairPoint Communications (FP) requests expedited review of this application to allow continued progress of FP in meeting their Public Service Board requirements in FP's 100% broadband coverage by the end of December 2010. _#VG THE WTHWESrut Y 't4E NORTHEASTERLY THE SOU rNERLY LNE OF WS NOW OR FORAAERL Y ARK#JG TW SOUTHWESTERL Y T"E AVRThCRL Y $DEL NE OF FAYETTE ROAQ• L L OW0,46 AN ARC TO THE N 177525- E. AN ARC ROAD. FOLLOWNG AN ARC UMG OF N 3-49.45" E tL Y SVELPE OF LANDS MIE WAPOMERLEAU. � t t BUIL DING � lB596 Sfl ary rerAtB .urar awrc t ra Ex SETmco fJo-se "w ' f ` ............ .. X / ET � ATE OF' LAAVS r NV RNER OF LANDS CONVEYED \(� / ' � � $ v 336 PAGE 437. OF Tl + $� / ESTERL Y CORNER OF LAAOS _ \� �. E OF VERMOtNT TO A POINT.' • ti ''� R / / SLOB �� 'A"SW TO A PONT BENG N !f NORTHERLY EDGE OF SAro 4 b / ¢1 Z$5 431 INER 4A9F.• / � v A404 $42 NCE OF 4TL94: TO A PONT v � �� Q :Alh MERXWW1pOWRLEAU TO / j3 44 36 ' BIX.AI�04 COACRETE / ,'�\• r� , �. l 90t#OARY MARKER J" ABOVE GRADE ' , g / r h - ?qs !.PIPE W/CR/MPEO Top / h 9� ` JJJJ -/ TOP FOUND RDE r0 S (LEANS 0.25' SOUTHERL Y),4. 8LB U.RA'8 / A R CEL TE OF VERIONT. NOW LEASED TO WJW0,vT RAEWAY CO- :R OF LAAOS CONVEYED BY JAA4"S J. FAYETrE TO r BLNLNMTON LAAO RECORDS 4AVS OF THE' STA rE OF VERMOINT TO A PONVT.• S OF T),IE STATE Of VERMONT. TO A PW..• FLL: OF LAAOS OF rW STATE OF VET OV7-. TO A PAWT: E4 TO A POIVT• LARK#✓ AROT pftM7ES. TO A POWT;• A POAVT NMTH OF T)�" *ES TM Y SOELAC OF FAYET TE ROAD: ORD LE7359.06: AAV A 0"D WARM OF :Ht7IPp LENGTH OF 33d501 AM) A CHM BEARMrG OF 19ro755- E 22Ar TO A POWr LYM 17-W SOVT;WRL Y NEW/PCMERL' EAU TO A PCAVT: ASTERL Y CAVC'R OF A PAVED PARKNG AREA_- 4�TWRLY ED ' $A0 PAVED PAWNNG AREA TO A MARKER SET , }( 20'SFWER EASEAdFNT NOTE 2% / L LoL p1p .et4, j*/ m"v'i� 9T a BUILDIIJG +2 l85S16 SF! ,N R pa OL, 5/B- REBAR W, % 1 ` �.r AL U"I CAP FOU140 �L,oVGr� LEG END 0 • ■ 0 B CALCULATED POINT IRON PIN SET fSEE NOTE 2) IRON P/N OR PIPE FOUND CONCRETE BOUNDARY MARKER FOUND LAMP POST GAS METER CABLE rV PEDESTAL rELEAMONE PEDESTAL WATER VALVE STAND -PIPE RIGHT OF WAY OR EASEMENT LINE FENCE OR FENCE REMAINS �IAumupt RAILROAD TRACKS COWCED AND PREPARED BY BUTTON ASSOCIA TES LAND SURVEYORS - BOLMARY CONSULTANTS SOUTH 8tRLANGTON. VERMONT (802) B6J-16 3/4' ).PIPE FOUND l2" ABOVE GR, (A LE iee '� GRAPHIC SCA etoo ��P■r —ter--,.� 2m 4e0 500 FEET PAGE NO 1 GARDENED SUPPLY COMPANY 472 Marshall Are. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802)658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 630660 LARKIN TERRACE LANDSCAPE FLAN NET 30 DAYS DAY 9/22/10 8.26 FAIRPOINT C'Oi'1MUN CATIDi'c DUE DATE: 10/22110 DOCV 42225 800 HINESRURG ROAD TERM0554 **DUPLICATES* INVOICE SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 05403 k*DLPLICATE** (902) 863-0660 TAX 001 VT TAXARI.E SALES ORDR 812565 LN # SHIPPED rORDERED ju/m 1 SKU -_ _DESCRIPTION S— --]--UNITS PRICE! PE� EXTENSION SUGG 1 5 EA DESIGNCSDHR DESIGN COrPREHENSIVE SITEIHOUR 5 60.00 /EA 300.00 N 2 8 EA MILEAGE NILEAGE A .55 /EA 4.40 N AMOUNT CHARGED TO STORE ACCOUNT g 304.40 TAXABLE 0.00 NON-TAXABLE 304.40 X SUBTOTAL 304.40 Received by — ------- TAX AMOUNT 0.00 TOTAL MOUNT 3Ei4. Afi PAGE NO 1 ARDENEW SUPPLY MP CO ANY 472 Marshall Ave. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 630660 LWIN TERR DESIGN CHANGES NET 30 DAYS Da-W ?12211e0 %09 FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS DUE DATE: 10l22110 DOC# 42226 800 HINESBURG ROAD TERt)0554 **DUPLICATE** * INVOICE * SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 05403 **DUPLICATE** (802) 863•-0660 TAV : 001 VT TAXABLE SALES LN # SHIPPED I ORDERED I U/M SKU DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE /PER EXTENSION . SUGG 1 I EA DESIGNCSDHR DESIGN COMPRE;ENSIVE SITE/HOUR 1 60.00 /EA 60.80 N *s. WDLINT CHARGED TO STORE ACCOUNT ** X Received by 60.00 TAXABLE 0.00 NON-TAXABLE 60.00 SUBTOTAL 60.00 TAX AMOUNT 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT (1@.50 PAGE NO 1 630660 fiffARDENER' SUPPLY CO MPANY 472 Marshall Ave. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802)658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 LARK.IN TERRACE LANDSCAPING NET 30 DAYS DGV 9/22/10 9.14 FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS DULCEY MASTRANGELO EXP. DATE: 9/16/10 DOC# 811359 800 HINESEURG ROAD FAIR POINT 01"ICATIONS TERIM554 800 HINESWRG ROAD # ESTIMATE SOUTH BURLINGTO 19 054.13 S. BUR:LINGTON VT 05403 (802) 853-0660 TAX 001 VT TAXABLE SALES EST. 811359 LN # I SHIPPED I ORDERED JU/Ml SKU DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE / PER EXTENSION S13GG 1 16 EA THJGCSMIH036 ARBORVITAE EMERALD GREEN 3-41 69.99 16 48.99 /EA 783.84 SN 2 16 EA CEDARS INSTALL 3-4' CEDAR / ARB 60.00 16 48.00 /EA 768.00 DN DISCOUNT 20.00% 3 1 EA ZIPHG DELIVERY ZONE 1 PLANTS R HARDGDS 1 100.00 /EA 100.00 *N X ESTIMATE *a ESTIMATE ** ESTIMATE ** ESTIMATE #� ReceiFed Iry TAXABLE 0.00 NON-TAXABLE 1651.84 SUBTOTAL 1651.84 TAX AM U INT 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT 1651.84 --- f.46 i EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRES7NT_,, that I, John P. Larkin of the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, in consideration of One Dollar and other valuable considerations to me paid by New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, `a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, and convey unto the said New England Telephone and Telegraph Company the right to lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, replace and remove lines for -the transmission of intelligence, including the necessary wires, cables, conduits, pipes, guys, anchors, fixtures, prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets and appurtenances in, upon, under and over the following described premises in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont of which I am the sole owner bounded and described as follows, to wit: A parcel of land, known as Larkin Terrace, 1185 Shelburne Road and lying on the westerly side of U. S. Highway #7. Area of easement commencing at a point (301) more or less westerly of the westerly sideline of U. S. Highway 17, and (21.801) northerly of land now or formerly of Farrell, thence continuing in a generally westerly direction, a distance of (301) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally northerly direction a distance of (201) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally easterly direction a distance of (301) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally southerly direction a distance of (20') more or less to the point or place of beginning. Also meaning and intending to include a strip of land ten feet (101) in width running from said easement area, easterly to the westerly sideline of U. S. Highway #7, to connect all cables, conduits, and facilities within U.S. 7 with facilities located, or to be located within said easement area. Grantee agrees to make every effort to save existing trees, and to landscape the easement area in a manner acceptable to grantor. , This. 'is a corrective,.eacems-;t. C:r i -he _,�vnress.purpose of description of said*20' x 30I.site and supercedes and replaces easement recorded at Vol. 319, Page 336-337, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The above granted rights being more particularly described as the exclusive right within a parcel or lot of land twenty feet by thirty feet (20' x 301) to construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, replace and remove prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets, including the necessary cables, pipes, conduits, equipment, facilities and appurtenances within said parcel as the grantee may from time to time desire, in, upon, over and under said described parcel, with permission to enter upon said parcel and upon said premises for ��}}��ere to for all the above purposes. Ci,ES��fFICE Received —RI` 192� a 3_ 7n r M Recorded i Vol. � on page- OfSo. Burlington Ladd Recor Attest: Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk T,.e grantor for himself, his he.':rs, executors, administrators and assigns, hereby covenants that he will not erect or permit any building or any other structure upon said parcel which in the judgement of the grantee, its successors and assigns, might interfere with the proper maintenance of said facilities, or their service in connection therewith. The grantee shall have the right to connect such cables, and wires within said prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets, with the poles, conduits, cables wires which are located or which may be placed in public ways or streets within, adjacent or contiguous to the aforesaid premises. To have and to hold the above granted rights and privileges in, upon, and over said premises to the said New England Telephone and Telegraph. Company, its successors and assigns, for their own use and behoof forever. Avid 1 uo hereby for myself and my heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, covenant with the said grantee and its successors and assigns, that I am lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that I am free from all encumbrances except, that I have good right to sell and convey the rights aforesaid and that I will and my heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns shall warrant and defend the same to said grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. In Witness Whereof, the said hand and commmon seal to be hereto day of )y y- , 1992. Witness '� C Witness/ John P. Larkin has caused his affixed this Jo P. Laskin State of Vermont, County of Chittenden ss., j o �� , 1992 Then Personally appeared before me, the above named John P. Larkin and acknowledged this instrument to be his free act and deed, before me. My Commission Expires: N ar Publid P lic DDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY ' Gall the fence People" MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY 1341 ETHAN ALLEN HIGHWAY NEW HAVEN, VERMONT 05472 (802) 388-2225 PROPOSAL/CONTRACT Customer Information: FairPoint-Dulcey Mastrangelo 1185 Shelburne Rd South Burlington, VERMONT 05403 Notes: _ This estimate is for the installation of 86 linear feet of 6' high Bufftech White Vinyl fencing with the following details: -- 6' high solid Lexington style fencing. -- 5"x5"x107" square white vinyl posts set 36" deep, 8'oc in concrete -- Includes 1-4' single gate with heavy duty black hinges & latch. --Includes flat post caps. --Includes Labor. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY agrees to guarantee above fence to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for three years. Gates will require maintenance based on useage & care. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY shall advise the customer as to local zoning regulations but responsibility for complying with said regulations and obtaining any required permits shall rest with the customer. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY will assist the customer, upon request, in determining where the fence is to be erected, but under no circumstance does MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY assume any responsibility concerning property lines or in any way guarantee their accuracy. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY will assume the responsibility for having underground public utilities located and marked. Any "non-public" utilities such as sprinkler lines, propane tank lines, pool utilities, etc must be identified by the customer. All Northern White Cedar fence components are naturally resistant to rot. White cedar is a natural wood product with color variations and is subject to warping, twisting and checking. Additional charges for any extra work not covered in this contract requested by the customer will be added to the contract price. The full amount of Contract Amount: $ 1401-44 Down Payment: $ Balance Due: $ �" !� 3, 414 Job Information: Page 1 of 1 09/16/2010 Larkin Apts. Next to Theater kc ) seu..n ..____...._......... _......... ....... _. n.n.n uon. :o v.o on :n�v v+tle cr er P �oPo..tl °•° NOT TO SCALE Ap tc. I2' 0 this contract along with any additional charges will become payable upon completion of the work contracted. A finance charge of 1 1/2% per month (or a minimum of $1.00), which is an annual percentage rate of 18%, shall be applied to accounts that are not paid within 10 days after completion of any work. All materials will remain the property of MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY until all invoices pertaining to this job are paid in full. Approve Accepted fo Customer: l7 D stomer Date Accepted for MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY: Salesperson Date No Text A �,r �I• �ri A --IQ•:'I�ii- is i i �,i •. i ° -•aa�� + "^>,. t Y_ 1 i - 45 A. - _ ____w_-, "�- ir•�'i.� I'' {' T'�- �' � y �� _�.Y-1� -tee--- ��.�_ -jj\■RR�r{ ,e+a Rw ..wx claEn�tHt IM i IKI F \ ..A < too--, 75 .;� N to VH lir ! ram. M1_- •'d a Ax FS! 20_2 r# _ .- a -a r 1 :r At V 22 20k 0 . +Fc d ,r A3 1002 r■ �iFfi I ltLY- •1. lM1. IM1.' 1 i'l.' w •�� _.. . ii .......... IT 4 �•' I ti ' 1 i I ��' f ! ; 47 II I . •.. � '°+.c. �• 'k`'`�•• .--tip' - � f( 1 .- , � .•-i f1 r'r.l r •r7 __ T \,. .` 11 �t �. N6, I (S�IIII:., jll il� rJi �� r• r'' i �� �: a< _ — _— T_. ' _.._ •,j 17 - TER j rN ti I� I• � -1--r h_ _•-�--r _ --ram { - I _ -_ 7� ~--_ - < n, ` , <y i 4 z)•i J.• .vl }thal'� ,i'ai-'r'C- 1 4' a IarFi'r�ililrfi�U LOT GE .1A iL* IN Atr R•MLf4tt rLf'+ r■YSLWMn f7 % MMM IT "1. ■ M yNR tiara a st1r71 91ah'11f KMa r■_'1?2% Wr-1 Lh' MA) MI HIM .3 wf , Y.L F 0.1 t 1. , Srr -1. ■ n tor.1r rr b Iltr'- .liL Lcu s', L� of f-14 iItly idrl+ iC'■ LE GEINt7 - .rsif rr Mrr•�SCW'.vr a5r -CJ13MG tilrri-M .. rr---�- ww•_rgKG 5j� 44r "a�aGF,A•rti•+rii q% ClClM1 lDI ILX vp -�i—R1�-� rT1]rt7jj ji F41.in .rY(r rA IF: ii r�i:iMl �SJ�ILr 1 � VA}Yi4 171 MSZO M Arrr c:FW1 WAv Y .lM1rY�p�'Sit�f�:.�a: AY-.taM RECEIVED %fogs ;1t� of 5:. 8pri►y?}r. s 1 ■ ti ar ., I � � i}I �. _ .. IT +4r J` rRj fdES.�IY!'�R11rr' il mr TW'4 iw-4w%u% LYs;r,! L ,, •,, ' i ;1.. � 1 � ! •�y fi.£�,YAC th'7 f4t4� .�Lf :rir $4fT4111'.�. T __. -.. . 1 �1 vsix b.d5' �rrwK xz i • � r . • � PA R: r it�. '• �k' �y�►:Irr�!•: -a•r�a .. r�-f_. '.:- , �:�- -. i : -=f �.. _ ' . -�'... .. .. _ __ , 1 ,; • 1 j a— tJ l J f.� UTfLJ J ! L' a _PlitiN-___'-_ I { 1. - `_- —�' .; s� _�_ - �.�.r.�a_.��r■:a: �"T" - G■wN YR►w+ vro W-c : rah Y Pam■ _ - _ 4. Ir�l -... f�-i+ 'rJ tY1=5 t,tc-'tRai•F_a.T� ' _-+16 a,\. .. Ji l: r+.1 i . -_ri � _ _ si •+6+fY••-• I i �•lti,((!'tT+�q� � ../a.'Y. xi - ra-1= t eta •.'EF7r =firT .. ;._ NEW 1"PVC TO MESA-2 g 5 NEW 4"C PLI TO MESA LARKIN TERRACE -118S SHELBURNE ROAD PARCEL ID # 1S40-0118S QO DUCTS A B,C,AND D GO TO MH 111430 LITESPAN 1" TH t18� 2000 CABINET �y STIC -2 21r4' PVC SCH 80 ELECTRICAL ® NEW 2" SCH 40 ELEC TO POWER PED THIS PLAN • T ��s� Z Notice: Not for Use/dIsdosure outside of FAIRPOINT COWUNICATtONS without written agreement ft—ftwne'l 1 SHELBURNE ROAD 2.4" C PLASTIC TO MH 111430 5 TO P,82 N' SAFETY NOTES: INFO PLAN ONLY SIGNATURE DATE MODIREV NO. DATE em NO. PRINT 2 OF PREPARED BY: T,H.BUSHFY LT. NOTICE C.O. /EXCHANGE NAME: TYPE RECORD REF: BURLINGTON AERIAL. c.o. mxemNGE CODE: PRE CT YES 0 NO UNDERGROUND 4741 PRIMARY VOLTAGE TO GROUND BLOCK (NYT) MUNICIPALITY: GMPC 7.2 KV MON SYSTEM CON"T BURLINaTON CABLE PRESS. I UNDER PRESS. YE (3UFf6R YES [� NO ® MRNtiOIE LOCATION kRfif NA TRANSAMMON MALIMT YESQNOQ AMT. BRIDGE TAP - KF SITE DETAIL 20' X 30' EASEMENT 20, 2' 1V 2" LITESPAN PAD+y 6' 14' f i� 47' 1 LAWN AF, r� Bkv5 u ExI TI M 67 �1/GkTtIOZN c5EF12V �',5 Zil LA-R K► u AFkRT-M>✓UT ` , 3a ` F=ksanr tF f STI N 67 F� PAP LAWN cS l P F_WAZ—K OUP FANF-(.st G` '� 4s#EL-00RN F-- Ro,kD FAIRPOINT LARKIN TERR& )PROJECT PLANT LIST EXISTING TREES KEY COMMON NAME 1 CRABAPPLE i 2 BOXELPER 3 ASH 4 NORWAY MAPLE ADDITIONAL PLANTS NUR MATURE SERY HEIGHT BLOOM/FOLIAGE/ KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY (H X W) INTEREST TREES /SHRUBS NARROW, COM PACT THWA PYRAMIDAL EMERALD GREEN OCCIPENTALIS 8-15' X EVERGREEN WITH A ARBORVITAE 'SMARA41Y 2.6 3-S LUSTROUS FOLIAGE t TITLE: W! LLARKt L? address: 1195 sH-a LB U RN F R 60LA V U rl . 7-6 VT sews: ' g 11 = I ' — oil l4g.. - Zo - Z010 drawn . SlLV1.4 O PP— N & 1 S) 80�- 6s8- 3684} 6 ADDENERS, SUPPLY COMPANY 472 MsrsbalI Avenue, Williston, Vermont 05495 802.658.2433 PAGE NO I fiffARDENER SUPPLY COMPANY 472 Marshall Ave. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802)658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 630660 LARKIN TERRACE LANDSCAPE PLAN NET 30 DAYS DAY 9/22/10 8:26 FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS DUE DATE: 18/22/10 DOC# 42225 800 HINESBURG ROAD TERK#554 **DUPLICATE** * INVOICE * SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 05403 **DUPLICATE** (802) 863-0660 TAX 001 VT TAXABLE SALES ORDR 812565 _ LN # SHIPPED I ORDERED I U/M SIN DESCRIPTION UNITS PRICE / PER EXTENSION SUGG 1 5 EA DESIGNCSDHR DESIGN COMPREHENSIVE SITE/HOUR 5 68.80 /EA 388.00 N 2 8 EA MILEAGE MIILEAGE 8 .55 /EA 4.40 N *# AMOUNT CHARGED TO STORE ACCOUNT ** 304.40 TAXABLE 0.00 NON-TAXABLE 304.40 X SUBTOTAL 304.40 Received by TAX AMOUNT 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT 304.40 t t I PAGE NO I SUPPLY COMPANY COMPANY 472 Marshall Ave. Williston. Vermont 05495 (802) 658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 30660 LARKIN TERR DESIGN CHANGES NET 30 DAYS DAV 9/22/10 9:09 FAIRPOINT CC91MUNICATIONS DUE DATE: 10/22/10 DOC# 42226 800 HINES14IRG ROAD TERM#594 **DUPLICATE** * MICE * SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 05403 **DUPLICATE** (802) 863-0660 TAX s 001 VT TAXABLE SALES IM SHIPPED I "Vc;REu IwIffli OT%U I DES . ..... J_ UNITS PRICE / PER SUGG I EA DESIGNCSDHR DESIGN CR1PREffNSIVE SITEMOUR 1 60.00 /EA ** AMOUNT CHARGED TO STORE ACCOUNT ** X Recehed by 60.00 TAXABLE NON—TAXABLE SUBTOTAL TAX A"OUNT TOTAL AMOUNT EXTENSION 60.00 N 0.00 60.00 60.00 PAGE NO i 6jDENEeQ SUPPLY COMPANY 472 Marshall Ave. Williston, Vermont 05495 (802) 658-2433 Fax (802) 860-2936 630660 LARKIH TERRACE LANNDSCAPING NET 30 DAYS DAV 9/22/10 9:14 FAIRPOINT C014MUNICATIONS DULCEY MASTRAWFLO EXP. DATE: 9/16/10 DOC# 811359 800 HINESBURG ROAD FAIR POINT WIMUNICATIONS TERM0554 ********** * 800 HINESBURG ROAD * ESTIMATE SOUTH BURLINGTO VT 054€,3 S. BURLINGTON VT 85483 ********** * (802) 863-0660 TAX 001 VT TAXABLE SALES EST. 811359 LN # I SHIPPED I ORDERED JU/Mj SKU DESCRIPTION UNITS I PRICE / PER EXTENSION SUGG 1 16 EA THJOCSMIH036 ARBORVITAE EMERALD GREEN 3-41 69.99 16 48.99 /EA 783.84 SH 2 16 EA CEDARS INSTALL 3-4' CEDAR / ARE 60.00 16 48„00 /EA 7M 00 DN DISCOUNT 20.08% 3 1 EA Z1PHG DELIVERY ZONE 1 PLANTS R HARDGDS 1 100.00 /EA 100.00 *N X ** ESTIMATE ** ESTIMATE ** ESTIMATE ** ESTIMATE ** Received by TAXABLE 0000 NON-TAXABLE 161.84 SUBTOTAL 1651„84 TAX AMOUNT 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT 1651„84 t EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRES2NT_-, that I, John P. Larkin of the City of Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, in consideration of One Dollar and other valuable considerations to me paid by New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, and convey unto the said New England Telephone and Telegraph Company the right to lay, construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, replace and remove lines for -the transmission of intelligence, including the necessary wires, cables, conduits, pipes, guys, anchors, fixtures, prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets and appurtenances in, upon, under and over the following described premises in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, State of Vermont of which I am the sole owner bounded and described as follows, to wit: A parcel of land, known as Larkin Terrace, 1185 Shelburne Road and lying on the westerly side of U. S. Highway #7. Area of easement commencing at a point (301) more or less westerly of the westerly sideline of U. S. Highway #7, and (21.801) northerly of land now or formerly of Farrell, thence continuing in a generally westerly direction, a distance of (301) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally northerly direction a distance of (201) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally easterly direction a distance of (301) more or less to a point, thence turning an angle to the right and running in a generally southerly direction a distance of (201) more or less to the point or place of beginning. Also meaning and intending to include a strip of land ten feet (lot) in width running from said easement area, easterly to the westerly sideline of U. S. Highway #7, to connect all cables, conduits, and facilities within U.S. 7 with facilities located, or to be located within said easement area. Grantee agrees to make every effort to save existing trees, and to landscape the easement area in a manner acceptable to grantor. _ Tbi.s.'is a corrective..eacesren. '- for lba _express purpose of description of said*201 x 301.site and supercedes and replaces easement recorded at Vol. 319, Page 336-337, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The above granted rights being more particularly described as the exclusive right within a parcel or lot of land twenty feet by thirty feet (20' x 301) to construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, replace and remove prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets, including the necessary cables, pipes, conduits, equipment, facilities and appurtenances within said parcel as the grantee may from time to time desire, in, upon, over and under said described parcel, with permission to enter upon said parcel and upon said premises for ere to for all the above purposes. I Ci, F8vc AC , Received I LI 199,P, -t a 3-70 P M Recorded � i Vol. on page- �� Of So. Burlington Ladd Recor Attest:r�. r.`111,. .cox. Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk T'Sie grantor for himself, his he.'.rs, executors, administrators and assigns, hereby covenants that he will not erect or permit any building or any other structure upon said parcel which in the judgement of the grantee, its successors and assigns, might interfere with the proper maintenance of said facilities, or their service in connection therewith. The grantee shall have the right to connect such cables, and wires within said prepared surface mounted telecommunications equipment cabinets, with the poles, conduits, cables wires which are located or which may be placed in public ways or streets within, adjacent or contiguous to the aforesaid premises. To have and to hold the above granted rights and privileges in, upon, and over said premises to the said New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, its successors and assigns, for their own use and behoof forever. Arid 1 dry hereby for myself and my heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, covenant with the said grantee and its successors and assigns, that I am lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that I am free from all encumbrances except, that I have good right to sell and convey the rights aforesaid and that I will and my heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns shall warrant and defend the same to said grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. In Witness Whereof, the said hand and commmon seal to be hereto day of 1� �'q 1992. Witness Itl CMG(/ Witness/( - John P. Larkin has caused his affixed this Jo P. Larkin State of Vermont, County of Chittenden ss., Tu - , 1992 Then Personally appeared before me, the above named John P. Larkin and acknowledged this instrument to be his free act and deed, before me. My Commission Expires: N ary Public 1VI� DDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY "Call the Fence People" MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY 1341 ETHAN ALLEN HIGHWAY NEW HAVEN, VERMONT 05472 (802) 388-2225 PROPOSAL/CONTRACT Customer Information: FairPoint-Dulcey Mastrangelo 1185 Shelburne Rd South Burlington, VERMONT 05403 Notes: _ This estimate is for the installation of 86 linear feet of 6' high Bufftech White Vinyl fencing with the following details: -- 6' high solid Lexington style fencing. -- 511x5"x107" square white vinyl posts set 36" deep, 81oc in concrete -- Includes 1-4' single gate with heavy duty black hinges & latch. --Includes flat post caps. --Includes Labor. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY agrees to guarantee above fence to be free from defects in materials and workmanship for three years. Gates will require maintenance based on useage & care. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY shall advise the customer as to local zoning regulations but responsibility for complying with said regulations and obtaining any required permits shall rest with the customer. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY will assist the customer, upon request, in determining where the fence is to be erected, but under no circumstance does MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY assume any responsibility concerning property lines or in any way guarantee their accuracy. MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY will assume the responsibility for having underground public utilities located and marked. Any "non-public" utilities such as sprinkler lines, propane tank lines, pool utilities, etc must be identified by the customer. All Northern White Cedar fence components are naturally resistant to rot. white cedar is a natural wood product with color variations and is subject to warping, twisting and checking. Additional charges for any extra work not covered in this contract requested by the customer will be added to the contract price. The full amount of Contract Amount: $ '4403- 4 Down Payment: $ �/ Balance Due: $ 3, 10 -3' Job Information: Page 1 of 1 09/16/2010 Larkin Apts. Next to Theater - ._... __............ __._..._- Ease v.a zr er ,ocos.a NOT TO SCALE this contract along with any additional charges will become payable upon completion of the work contracted. A finance charge of 1 1/2% per month (or a minimum of $1.00), which is an annual percentage rate of 18%, shall be applied to accounts that are not paid within 10 days after completion of any work. All materials will remain the property of MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY until all invoices pertaining to this job are paid in full. Approve b Accepted fo Customer: l7 a ustomer Date Accepted for MIDDLEBURY FENCE COMPANY: Salesperson Date A In I ol rfa 41 No Text TER MAI rkw 2 W N iFl 7 1* 1A ON La 2m!. 7, OF-717. ZA 22 10i 0—,Fylj lo'� o , litif- 4F - ml 4* ;71 my 5 Is" Ct-.741 10 0 Rl ;ZH A'f ,PA,off/ ,'lVl:7 LOT DEU.L: '13HC - -,'.'Vf7FRi7,P4 Ma HIM k :+ mr EcrmLsl, E�`n.-fl, of F1.VAINU.4 Llkw-,Ltlw LLE CE.IMI-) FEAW Tr Ar;mr ........ ... -CrOA - - - - - - - M Wf CC& VAIAMM W"Up rworo-Wo f YA* r C-,W-f W� 2-1•O I L . iv L &10 M SITE & UTILITIES, PLAN�-- Fl '. LL f, T L L'Y lb w t1 10��7 `• i` a r''r r•i 7 �} ♦ � �_ �yK.��(q��� �Y �.`r'•� it �, .�• dw •¢. • use+ r � �. •,r 1_. � $ ti P' � •y��f.y..1( �' mil• ,-� l � �. � -. - �ey�.i% ', 'a ,j,�' +.� Jr7�' tr'.�a•'�� � �Vft •'! t'• � �' "• +; .j :i� - S�' fir.. i - � - J''. r.:..-....s., .yy �y�r r � _ v s10 a Kam=•, I±iZ4/f>il"'1,^tiv..1h1I1I1I'111I 1{'1I 1F 11".Af-\f11.1111"i f�/1f\1-\f11•('•1f'-'1(/!'1f'1f1/"Zf'"1f'if'iF'1f'tI`'11Z1'111 f"�1l11-/!'i({I'�11.11 ff 1!'11.11•>I .'1 YZ 1"1f (''�■ n 0 R y. A l ! 1 C'7 A"I k:p py. IIa !Y NA. 411 -k.Y to k.Y.ki p.Y CA 0..4 "'ta k-Y its k'Y I,# tv kY kA kJ k.A to kJ k9,IL•/ to k.Y k.A k':Y k-A t' A 1' e / 1 A i 1 n (n 1..A 1 f I I I' 1 t:Y f:�p to L'tf R N it (1 � H e, H 8 H 9 8 8 ® u LA V 1 1. i (M to ILj 1. 1 I I I 1 i I I;.Y G'1 Cl P:Y tll 1: J/ 1 I A I( 11 I 1 1 f f A 1 a 1 1 1+1 tt. k J k'A [ -1 t' I KI f• I f. Y W i Y 6 l" i.7 t7 k7 QA v C'+I jY 6'9 Iq k(1 w WE CJ tl RJ k(1 W lu I"1'77 C7 k7 li e fi4.� f �� +,�� 9 tyy . g fil i�li. _• � 1�: brit. � �' � �� � ��� �� �i' I 1 M , i - A{ r ,.5� LARKIN TERRACE - 1185 SHELBURNE ROAD PARCEL ID # 1540-01185 OO DUCTS AB,C.AND D GO TO MH # 430 LITESPAN 1" TH B 2DOO CABINET O O LIC _2 2'A' PVC SCH 80 ELECTRfCAL NEW 2" SCH 40 ELEC TO POWER PED THIS PLAN INFORMATION ONLY Notke: Not for UseldisGosure outs de of FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS without written agreement 1 SHELBURNE ROAD _ n4 24" C PLASTIC TO -� MH 111430 5 C) TO P.82 30' N SAFETY NOTES: INFO PLAN ONLY SIGNATURE DATE 711212WO MOD+REV NO, DATE EWO NO. PRINT 2 OF PREPARED BY: T H.BUSHEY LT. NOTICE C.O. /EXCHANGE NAME' TYPE RECORD REF: BURLINGTON AERIAL I A2.11 C.O. /EXCHANGE CODE' PRECT YES NO UNDERGROUND 4741 PRIMARY VOLTAGE TO GROUND BLOCK (NYT) MUNICIPALITY' GMPC 7.2 KV MGN SYSTEM CONDUIT BURLINGTON CABLE PRESS. UNDER PRESS. YESONO ELIMIT BUFFER YES NO ® MANHOLE LOCATION MI-k1 NA TRANSMISSION YESQNOLJ AMT. BRIDGE TAP - KF .a---- 20' SITE DETAIL 20' X 30' EASEMENT