Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-75-0000 - Supplemental - 1185 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BL'RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSMENT ?findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions gener lly created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in t neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefsre necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 31*' (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant;/ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'. character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and jam/ (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least :modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal ; Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign—�i List 1. 2. ings below: SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTENT Pindings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to ydueo rticular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditionrally created b5� the provisions of the zoning regulations neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances,or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the pr visions of the zon g regulations and that the authorization o`' a variance is there ore necessary to enable the reasonable use f the property; (3) That such unnec sary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter e essential'' character of the neighborhood or district in wh h the property is located, nor substantially or permanently ' pair the appropriate use or development of adjacent p operty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal r Date I / - IZ2L Appellant /,-- Vote: Yes No Sign 4 List findings below: 1. -15!Le' - ->L--c — 2. 3• SOUTH BL'RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTK NT ^findings in accordance with Section 1+468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narro%-:ness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions ge erally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations inthe nei hborhood or district in which the property is located (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable thq reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (1+) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essentiall . character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be dctrimentai to the public welfare; an (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the pl@� <-IX Appeal # Date ZJ6/2J — Appellant %Z-'�7x Vo;,e : Yes No Sisn List findings below: 1 • C�� o ��°—� 2.