Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 1095 1089 Shelburne Road"M ..—T..—..—..— x-Lt—..—..—..—..—..—\—..,..—..—.._ jATE EXIST, FIRE HYDRANT. + y T� P 0 LOT NO, 1 = 104,763 S.F. BUILDING CALLO IS 0%) (MAM%_ ,I ADDD3% OVERA OVERALL COVERAGEkGE IT113 FRONT YARD C 7.9% ( IS 30%) L . Dr:dnrf i z EXIST IQ Ot SATURN SOUTH BURLINGTON _ � e CUSTOMER PARKING TIT 2 W 00 DISPLAY AREA SCRUB TREE'S LOT NO. 2 = 127,566 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE IS 9% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 30%) OVERALL COVERAGE IS 74.4% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 70%) FRONT YARD COVERAGE IS 6% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 30%) t CHAIN LINK FENCE NEW LIGHTING, MATCH EXIST. SIRIP�G EXISITNG CEMETERY t NEW STREET TREES t 612' MAPLE ' D 0z ��f I\\ NEW SATURN SIGN t� —3' ELM 0--STREET SIGN 24• MAPLE gELECT_P❑LE. NEW SIDEWALK SHELBURNE ROAD JWJ REALTY 1095 SHELBURNE RD. SOUTH BURLINGT❑N, VT SITE INF❑RMATI❑N LOT SIZE: 232,329 S.F. OR 5.34 ACRES BUILDING COVERAGE: EXISTING = 23,000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: 25,560 S,F,(2,560 S.F. ADD,) LANDSCAPED AREA: 69,930 S.F. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 162,399 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED: 11% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 69,9% (BLDG,PAVE,WALKS,ETC,) FRONT YARD COVERAGE: 12% BUILDING INF❑RMATI❑N 1, NO NEW EMPLOYEES. 2, BUILDING COST, $100,000. 3, TYPE OF C❑NSTRUCTI❑N, MATCH EXIST, PROPOSED PLANTINGS KEY NAME COMMENT IZE I OUANT. COST I RED MAPLE LACER RUBRUM) PADE Xcul. 7 *00 ''- PROPOSED PLANTING i REPLACEMENT TREES, (6) RED MAPLES '2 N PROPOSED LIGHTING FIXTURE. 2 1000W S.M.H. ON IS' ROUND STEEL POLE. FINISH TO MATCH EXIST. 0.0 EXIST. LIGHTING TYP. 0 10 50 100 NO. DATE REVI510N PARKING LAYOUT 8/ 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN RECEIVED DU LI REALTY 50UTt1 BURLINGTON, VERMONT WIEMANN - LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS, II QU G 2 b 1997 30 5OU111 PARK DRIVE - COLCHE5TER, VERMONT City of So. Burlington 5CALE I" = 30'-0" DRAWING NO - DATE 05. 27.07 DRAWN BY OON �— CHECKED DY GGL PROJECT 9.7 COPYRIGHT WIEMANN-LAMPHERP ARCHnLCfS. IN CADD PROJECT MAME: ACADDWG5 9GO47 5nC ray From: Doug Viehmann <dv@gvvarchitects.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:19 AM To: ray Cc: m_shapiro@nissanvt.com Subject: RE: Abutter Notice -1095 Shelburne Road - Freedom Nissan Project Ray Thank you for this information Per our conversation the other day the owner would like to withdraw our application at this time. The application can be returned to my office, once we determine a course of action we will resubmit a revised plan and application. Thank you Douglas R Viehmann AIA, Leed AP G V V Architects Inc 284 South Union Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 P-802-862-9631 M-802-578-6502 From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 9:28 AM To: Doug Viehmann Subject: Abutter Notice -1095 Shelburne Road - Freedom Nissan Project Doug, Attached, please find the draft agenda for the September 2nd DRB meeting and a cover letter for you to mail via regular mail to all the abutting landowners, including those across the street. Please mail these letters by the end of the day on August 22nd and then submit a Certificate of Service back to me which you can download at www.sburl.com/permits Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. south arfinoon PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-- A(.ce use only) APPLICATION F:-evelopment S TE PLAN REVIEW ❑Administrative Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): y- AJ0 $ I4,P- Fa0 p 8y1-41[10M LlL., 10 0) S, s4t?'Rp 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page ft 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): T-&a'L'"1' © iAA S "4,) T N C. 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Douglas Viehmann, G V V Architects 284 South Union Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: dv@gvvarchitects.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1095 Shelburne Road S Burlington 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): Ky-p —01 U 9 57 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.corn 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Remove existing plantings along Shelburne Road and Replace with new plantings. Purpose is to reduce maintenance cost for cars parked under trees and improve visibility of building and lot for potential buyers. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Car Dealership c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Car Dealership d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain):—26,000 sf - no change proposed e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): no change proposed f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): none g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): no change proposed h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Two parcels are being presented together, one removed tree and one new tree will be placed on South parcel all others on North parcel. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 233,530 Existing +/- 11 % / Proposed +/- 11 % / Sq. Ft. +/- 26,000 sq. ft. +/- 26,000 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing +/- 60 % / +/- 140,000 sq. ft. Proposed +/- 60 % / +/- 140,000 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing +/- 30 % / 9,800 sq. ft. Proposed +/- 30 '% / 9,800 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) +/- 4,000 sf * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): S 0 b. Landscaping: S $4000 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Value of existinq trees on site Value of existinq trees to be removed 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): no change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: NA 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: NA 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: September 2014 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I I" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the �ity at the time of s mitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's^fee ,Q schedule. A/v1 gn/v' l, 4 /�li��(/Y�ti✓�if/% � �� W //// � �0� : ��/ �� 1 Administrative site Ian applications re uiree 3 regular size copies, one reduced co 11" x 17" and one P PP q �) 9 P PY � ), digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. ATURE DF APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 41, PRINT REVIEW AUTHORITY: [2 Development Review Board ❑Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: rZ 1 The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 GUILLOT • VIVIAN • VIEHMANN Architects Inc. Freedom Nissan Tree Planting between Vehicle Inventory Parking Lot and sidewalk along Rt 7 South. July 2014 See proposed planting plan for new tree locations and sizing. New plantings to be installed fall 2014. Valuation of trees to be removed. type size condition location class base value quantity Value Arborvitae (.8) 6' ht poor (0.2) 0.6 $ 150 each 3 $ 43 Boxelder (.4) 40" d very poor (A) 0.6$ 4/si 1 $ 121 Lg Leaf Linden (.6) 10" d good (1) 0.6 $ 9/si 6 $ 1528 TOTAL VALUE EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED $1692 New perennial plantings per attached plan by G V V Architects titled Freedom Nissan Planting Plan dated 7 July 2014 are estimated to cost $3500 to $3800 installed. Estimate prepared by Landshapes. Douglas R Viehmann Frank Guillot FAA, Hon.MRAIC, NCARB Ann Vivian AIA, NCARB Douglas Viehmann AIA, L.EED-AP, NCARB gwarchitects.com 284 South Union St Burlington VT 05401 802 862-9631 Doug Viehmann To: Jason Hutchins Subject: RE: Freedom Nissan trees Good morning Doug, To do the plant list provided on your July 7 drawing including soils and bed prep would be 3,500-3800, add another 500 for edging and annuals. The Arborvitae are the hardiest variety but there is still a concern they will get salt damage from the salt spray of rt 7. 1 suggest keeping them as far back from the street as reasonable. Jason Hutchins General Manager �NDSHAPES landscape dcsign & inert;lhtlf)n 88 Rogers Lane Richmond, VT 05477 P. (802) 434-3500 ext. 107 F. (802) 434-3002 C. (802) 343-5199 Visit us @ www.landshapes.net From: Doug Viehmann [mailto:dv@gvvarchitects.com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:22 AM To: Jasonh@LandShapes.net Subject: Freedom Nissan trees Jason I understand that Mort has spoken to you about planting trees along the road at Freedom Nissan. We need to have an estimate of installed cost for our permit application ASAP. I am working on value of existing trees and Mort has someone else to deal with removal of existing. Can you look at the attached and give me an estimate for just installing the new plantings? Include a 10'X20' bed for annuals with some soil amendments and metal edging. Thanks Doug V. 0 �2'05m W I I ltt: INV. 37 6' Fl A DRAIN I oNC. FUEL 30 EASEL"FONT � - l ,, " --•. I Q ol. INTER II I I FkEEDtSsnty I m 96 IV. 98JO' CON4 (.VIL-1 I , I.i S .�/ ���_`� � �.:'•,t see: ^ BURLINGTON MALL INC. 1020 GALLON 'Ci SZPARATQR GENERAL N07M I. Exlettn{� tataltbo Rho" CFO approttlmot® only and may not be cornplete. The Contractor Choi[ 4�1d verify all ut®ity eanflFeto befosa oonstnEattan begins. All dlaermpanelea ehdl bo reported to the Enginae+r. The Contractor eholl contact DI Safe (1-800-225-4977) prior to any oanotauatian, Th® Contractor ®boll nepalr/reatore all dic&srboa aI as v dire t or Indtrect roeolt of the conatrdctIon at no @Oat to the 01 ' 3b All ettatuiocd rrom, ahall be rnaNtabled by the Contractor Font!! full v&gotaCion Is mota3lA�i¢e�. NOM, Survey Information ohorm on this plan pas obtained from I Plot by Paul t:tarcoLCa, rovloed Mcsch 19, 9971. ' EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS o a G ENT �-_.�.200 FINISH GRADE CONTOURS 013 h1 BullND oN - - -_ .._ , b i ., - o ®. - PROPERTY. LINE .. INV=I6:e.1 - -.. o EASER9EPoT /� 8E,BAGK PLANTING SCHEDULE POWER POLE \ \ I EX, LIGHT POLE �W mv-169,82 EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH TREE -EMO D BUWNG - `� EXISTING SHRUB SMUT —OFF VALVE MK LON NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY A Thujo occidentolis Arborvitae 6'-8' hgt Qty=8 'De roots Spire' 8 Fothergilla Major Mountain Witch Alder 3 gal Qty=3 'Mount Aiy C Clethro Alnifolia Summersweet 5 gal Qty=3 Ruby Spice _SS -^® SANITARY SEWER LINE - /� WATER LINE EX. w :e o ^ GAS LINE " v Ikwoie lJ/ $ '. ®uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ' m® STORM SEWER LINE aNiNI m�e.3 INV®IBP2 / / REMOVE ' ./. EYJSi1/3G1 '¢O/S Ut. r' ' 0 CLEANOUT Is -, 41, yTINb 1.16tNT wl' - HYDRMT 2oo"�i pit.® ;��'I: CATCH BASIN ' . • �'..' : 3'r✓' �w Rtlm / A2,A.. - DUMPSTER - VVIr I ei APPROVED BY R U710M OF. THE PLANNING C� OMMIOd OF \ 8 2� 20:, z6i Y- Pl?a?11Na V t7zeigoi THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT ON.THE DAY OF GRAPHIC SCALE p REQUIREMENTS AND a 1� -- CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTIONT S DAY s— --- �j'" 2240'09" E .GNED THI .a----= - I OF . i By CHAIRPERSON. ---5s _ _ —ss OWNER RECORD. 4�� �54# P1 � Im t t-- ELEV. 20a25 WEST ea ^ I Rim42oae1 1095 MiELBURNE- ROB REC1f ED SMITH BURLINGTO'NN, VT 05403-&94O JUL 9 2014 Guillot Vivian Viehmann ®/ ®® f' 1�0M N/.55AN PLAWIN6 PLANLS- of So Burlington ARCHITECTS 1 Burlington'Vermont 05401 5O(/ri7BURLINGrON,VCRMONT-30' 9JULY?O14 (802) 862-9631 sout ill ry9 ' '.`'{, PLANNING & ZONING October 31, 2013 Re: #SP-13-58 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com A � ��� f~ south urtin2tov PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- -- , (office use only) APPLIWATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNE)tM OFkRECO� (Name(s) as slaownn on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): ox 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT {�ame, mail'Mud address, hone an ax #): , 5Su . �c �'S SYIr UVO o y II 3 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Koyii, (3+*pcU,1 N 1.0-ty' sLeL6ui.n-e red. So.cil. gurC,•;,r• ✓ vr. 06ro3 - yok- fir, -gybn 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: Kt,,;„_ t3•�,✓� H !8 ,ycss�•✓vT. co1, 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: l n rt S g L �,.c,l�,t ,t dL 4 S: � t r t wj*i w t/h 06t%,3 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): J 5 y©-- C1 / 0e 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): a 0 7,C b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. Existing % / Proposed 0/./ sq. ft. sq. It b. Overall impervious coverage (building, pa k' g outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing /� % / sq. ft. Proposed ` % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) d * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC rl a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: $ '7 DO0.0 0 $ so0, o v 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the Cit at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 0 0 REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board VAdministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete /) ,fn ❑ inistrative le-ewA40 The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 Y.:A r„ FAYETTCO, INC. PROJECT BEMCHMA QN Rw-tenX EXISTING SEWER win Inv.-tn,4 20• WIDE SEWER RSs-188.33 — Rlu-t sSJO WV.-175.86 — — — — — — — — — — ISO AN A — . NEW 4' C.I. sEIIER uxif bW SRI S - 1/4-/ FT. —_ -- -- -MA H E1L E. - TRANSITION - — — — — -1•s W Jtt All CURS TO MATCH ow- r/ GRADES � r ! !Y PAVF)COW 71 rdT {♦�vI I'I CORE D SEAL N ,4 SEWERµPENETRA71ON r.� t lowAua ! low CMA pl '/ ` •61s1 aw' DRAINAGE EASEWMEN ►��d %ice . _� r 1: I FEE . i I t�,i •I.Ill�ili� T/,��������w�� � -9d1Q♦�lE WAU( PA DL C9 .a Ig N'200 ,Na. Ja' `•`"'4 �L-T Y V canal PAD — Jgg-- — m1— — 22*4WOO' E m[PresrE u„ TEST Ba s_.Z_ew�seslss�sRi � NIM`.20�.5 tacv. wJ.1a will a+ W t -. U.& ROUTE 7 - BH — w -- I J. & D. WESSON N. & S. PAPPAS, PERRY REST. GROUP • r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CEMETERY \ � h cove-l.s4u 0. Rau x1uo�[n suuara LEGEND: BURLINGTON MALL INC. — — — —am— — — EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS $00 FINISH GRADE CONTOURS -- PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT — — SETBACK q. POWER POLE ... EX. LIGHT POLE EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH ® TREE jj EXISTING SHRUB • SHUT-OFF VALVE — —>a — SANITARY SEWER LINE — r — WATER UNE — a GAS LINE — —UE — — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC — —ST — — STORM SEWER LINE ss NEW SEWER LINE r NEW WATER LINE IsCLEANOUT Ix HYDRANT Is CATCH BASIN ❑D DUMPSTER OWNER OF RECORD: JWJ REALTY, INC. IG95 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SO, BURLNGTON, VERMONT ON THE —DAY OF 19—, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 19—. BY CHAIRPERSON. GENERAL NOTES 1. EnbtIny 01111.1110 Shorn are approXknate anly and may no be compNta The Contractor .tall MIa wiry all utility cmnkte before canstructlan Dsght All dl.crepw.k.. Shad be reported to the Engineer. TN• Contractor shal contact Dig Safe (1-800-223-4977) pr(W to any construction. 2. The Contractor shall repot/restore all disturbed oreas as a dlrebt or Indirect result of the canstruction at no cast to the Omer. 3. Swviow oannwctlans shall be mode only after succweelul oW,pMtlon of all roWirea test. on the new IInw 4. Th. Contractor shall develop Aw-Bult Drawings during calstrucllon to be submitted to the Owner at the completlon of the pro)ect 5. AI disturbed meats shoo be maintained by the Contractor until full vegetation Is estaWI h" e. AI ewimUng pnwm•nt, walkwoNA oarbing, structures and utilities within the construction Ilmw and not Incorporated In the find deel0+ shall be disposed of at an approved l000tloh UNsbs othereles dk%ted. A9 tress within the comStructlan limits that cannot be maintained ,hall be deWed and grubbed. and the stumps shall be disposed of at a suitable off -site ,.at,.. Al trees beyond the oonstructlan limits .fall be maintain" 7. See ArmlteatWd plan. for bulding dimensions and layout.. NOTE: Survey Information warn an this plan was obtained from survey Plat by Paul Morcott., revised March 19, 1971. GRAPHIC SCALE 1e11e a - 0 (p►RT) 1 Leah - 30 rL ADDITION & RENOVATION TO: SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OVERALL SITE PLAN �I dJ.d � i.t rw,.� rN Dot• I C Vd I Revision Drown by MJW I Date 4-20-22 SHEET awaked by M,w S.W. 1• - 30• QML ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. ApprovedC SHEIBURNE, VERMONT lei I by -SAL ProJeat No. 921351 , � %%%///////// iii►iiiGiGil V? t \h 1' r tE I ss j. b SEWER HR n.r.tew3 erV.-jn4 FAYETTCO, INC. PROJECT BENCHYARKe EXISTING SEWER MH 20' WADE SEWER f4M-1a8M 1.iJo NV-t».1 EASEMENT fIV.-173.fIS _ _ _ _ _ _ — — .— — _ I4b 1. a ALL CURB TOMATCHi. GRADES���.. =' I. EDGE RP / TCOIRE AND SEA. $E*1ER PENETRATION i ��". ��////i�!%•:iJ low cul'o. / s � CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON CEMETERY LEGEND: / 19• f� BURLINGTON MALL INC. GE)4ERAL NOTES i. w by uun •.N wnr OOn Ne. Mt/of• rca"•f^"W"�°'pY�ia.�Aua d4�.p«1�1••.nwt be r ported to Me En9hwer. The Contractor end contact Dq Sao (1-E00-225-4877) P" to ony can.trucUan. 2. 7M Controctor a"-' r.pat/rector• au dbbreed on•w as d drelt « hdr.ct result of Me oonetrllctiorl at no oo•t w M• owl«. } S.O. earnectbne •hail 0. awde arty after wuccerm ocmpletbn of a1 required twte on B1e n•• 6w,. 4. TM Controet« wool d.ertep A• -Butt DrvAngs 4UA% Cal.tructbn to bo rAmitted to the own« at Me oomp.uan of th. praod . 6. AN dWbgbW er ce whdl be mohtdhed by the Canbract« untl " ve9.taUM M wtob"Whod. 0. M ed$" paww"w^E Wakway4: ourb9lq, •huaturw and utl9tlee wMh th. constructlon ImN..1d not hoorp«al.d h th• OW dwfpn WwM 04 alopw d of at an opprowd Wcatlan what be 4.ar.d 9 � aW Me WnnW . d W dfcPwed Of at o wultONe Off-Wt* ac beo0on. A• trey bey«W lM oorlctrlrctlan Ir. what b. mahtoh.d. 7. See ArOdoctwd plan• tar buldh9 dirnonsione and WyouL I NOT, Surwy hrarmotWn on~ on MI. plan wow obtained A«n w'r"+y Pict by Pall Mw..tte, rerieed March 19, 1971. — — — —200 — — — EASTWG GRADE CONTOURS 200 FINISH GRADE CONTOURS -- PROPERTY UNE _ _ _ _ — — — EASEMENT _ -- - — SETBACK POWER POLE -,� EX. LIGHT POLE EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH e TREE �x E70STWG SHPUB • SHUT -OFT VALVE — —>R -- SANITARY SEWER LATE WATER UNE — • GAS LINE — --LIE — — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC _ —n — -- STORM SEWER LINE NEW SEWER UNE W NEW WATER LINE • CLEANOUT zt HYDRANT ■ CATCH BASIN 2 DUMPSTER OWNER OF RECORD: JWJ REALTY, INC. w-za�e1 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD _ SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 U.& FOUTE 7 - 8141.BURW ROAD N. k S. PAPPAS, PERRY REST. GROUP APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON. VERMONT ON THE ._ DAY OF 19_, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF . 19- BY . CHAIRPERSON. � � � ems•. c6 �� ' •� SA)XI'.a k)'O E. o'fiaP' GRAPHIC SCALE erne e ( DI 7QT > �L1YL���IYYLL L Wab _ Ea R ADDITION do RENOVATION TO: P u�u kh SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON a 4N.-w Kiel,pEK OVERALL SITE PLAN n JJ.J t-9 At y a to - dawn by Jlrm(. Dobw 4-20-90 SHEET Chod wd by .11lm- Sode 1' - 3o• CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCtATES, INC. C 1 SHELBURNE, VERMONT l� I Apdrawd Oy 3A1L Pro)•et Nn 92135-1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 16, 2007 Maurice P. Adams Kenneth R. Adams, Inc. 18 Adams Park Milton, VT 05468 Re: Site Plan #SP-07-88 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Adams: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the Administrative Officer on November 16, 2007. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Permit Number SP- a- - RF CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) J.W.J. Realty Inc. 1095 Shelburne Rd. S Burlington, VT 05403 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Kenneth R. Adams, Inc. 18 Adams Park , Milton, VT 05468 802-893-1511 802-893-1841 FX 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax ft Maurice P. Adams, Kenneth R. Adams, Inc., 18 Adams Park, Milton, VT 05468 802-893-1511 PH 802-893-1841 FX 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1095 Shelburne Rd, So Burlington, VT 05403 New Car Dealershi 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1540 - 10089 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) Saturn & Chrysler new car dealerships b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)_ Property use to remain the size and all buildings to remain as they are now c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) Saturn 11,687 sq ft Chrysler 15,125 sq ft d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) Saturn 20' 0 with a mezzanine Chrysler 22'0 (2) floor elevations with mezzanine e) Number of residential unitts (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): No change to the number of employees g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): The installation of the stairs is a safety issue as requested by local inspectors when they visited the site 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed N/A % / no change sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed n/a % / no change sq ft c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed N/A % no changq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 200 sq. f t . * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 20, 000.00 b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Install emergency exit from mezzanine with stairs to ground level on exterior of buTI-ding using galvanized steel to prevent rusting. This use is for the safety of personnel 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): no change b) A.M., Peak hour for entire property (in and out): no change c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): no change 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: no change 2 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: no change 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: December 31, 2007 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) Please see attached list 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I I (S- VT REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete 4 liesignee Date SATU RN ABUTTERS 0675-00015 OLD ORCHARD REALTY PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 4193 BURLINGTON, 05402 1540-01125 LARKIN MILOT PARTNERSHIP C/O MCDONALDS P.O. BOX 447 ESSEXJCT, 05452 1540-01080 1080 SHELBURNE RD LLC 1184 WILLISTON RD. S BURLINGTON, 05403 1540-01110 JOLLEY ASSOC. 54 LOWER WELDEN ST. ST. ALBANS, 05478 40 FAYETTE SOUTHLAND ENTERPRISE C/O HANNAFORD BROS. CO. P.O. BOX 1000 PORTLAND, ME 7 FAYETTE J&J COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTIES LLC 21 COUNTRY CLUB ST. SWANTON, 05488 �i.k +•v w v y� xr •i r I„.jam y , +A/�'•'�� V ; r.V . ��M ', 'm,.. - y} " , 6� r. e mil;AW- wr ` ",w, `, w 'err.•,"" i" ''" �� t :dw�` . - y y T" Iry ✓ 4 r', 5d„ err r k 11 ern Jr f� w s"" ,� � ,��� - } " �;�� .� � rMr .,� "'�„` ry ,� "'�` .•�: f "1 "� ; M �'� w � '*' p' � �a �"^;' r 14 WV w v y� xr •i r I„.jam y , +A/�'•'�� V ; r.V . ��M ', 'm,.. - y} " , 6� r. e mil;AW- wr ` ",w, `, w 'err.•,"" i" ''" �� t :dw�` . - y y T" Iry ✓ 4 r', 5d„ err r k 11 ern Jr f� w s"" ,� � ,��� - } " �;�� .� � rMr .,� "'�„` ry ,� "'�` .•�: f "1 "� ; M �'� w � '*' p' � �a �"^;' r 14 WV No Text No Text i I I l J) 7Yos• W. ri \ • \ \\\\ I K PA SAWCU • NEW 4I INTOE ( I SETTER MH FAYETTCO, INC. — ,/PRua 9040ItARHe EXISTING SEWER MH N 1n4 EOMDESEWER �InYN EASEMENTN17sa-.4 61 ------------ W0 = c-- —— teb — — — — -s — -- NEW 4• C.I. SEWER LINE J71 MAT , EX E .P. - TRANSITION tss— — — — ALL g1RB TO MATCH ETlST'— — — — — — w/ j5R CORE AND SEAL SEWER PENETRATION - - - - - - -1es- - FAYETTCO, INC. .1 i it 1■\h�= Nunn no ./ R- �,es j IS me ♦2 a S00 WV.: CONC4 tAtllfAl \ II y ssm I V YI UGH MG -a O b POLE I G- CONO PAD - 202 _ N 22 22.40'00• E , lox— TT- - -u— Ss ss (­�_-�— — rlesT IIa RIM-201 S ELEV. 203.25 wt J. & D. WESSON CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CEMETERY Ise BURLINGTON MALL INC. NI / tl LEGEND: — -- — —200— — — EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS ENT 200 FINISH GRADE CONTOURS G ON -- PROPERTY UNE — — — — — — EASEMENT — — SETBACK \ POWER POLE \ ,er EX. LIGHT POLE ]e• .V.-less] EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH ® TREE C.I. FINAL E)OSMNG SHRUB \� DING Nv..tsl.7X • SHUT-OFF VALVE SANITARY SEWER UNE IN — WATER LINE — G — GAS LINE all —uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC i I —Sf STORM SEWER LINE a\ SS NEW SEWER LINE \ �—w NEW WATER LINE \ \ I I • CLEANWT Xj HYDRANT • CATCH BASIN ❑D DUMPSTER `-•-eIOSiWa 90N- - - --god- AND PUNTER ttEnra+E win y - - IIBr.20rel Ua ROUTE 7 - O ELBUtiE ROAD —w—'-- I N. k S. PAPPAS. PERRY REST. GROUP OWNER OF RECORD: JWJ REALTY, INC. 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 05403 APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT ON THE —PAY OF 19_, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 19—, BY CHAIRPERSON. GENERAL NOTES 1. Exlstlny ulitieMwn ts owe approximate only and may not be complete. The Contractor whall MI4 ve fly all utility crMkts before conetructon begin.. All discrepancies shall be s reported to the Engine. The Contracts Mall contact Dig Safe (1-800-225-4977) PAa to my construction. 2. The Contracts Mall repay/rests all disturbed areas as a direct or Indirect result of the construction at no cast to the Owns. 3. Service connections Mall be made only after successful completion of all required tests on the new line. 4. The Contractor Mali develop As -Bust Drawings during construcllm to be submitted to the Owner at the completion of the project 5. A9 disturbed seas Mall be maintained by the Contractor until WD vegstotlm Is established. S. All .ulsting pavement, walkways, aAing, structures and utilities within the construction limit. and not Ncorpsated In the final design Mall be disposed of at an approved location unless otherrlss directed. AN trees within the constructlon limits that cannot be maintained shoo be cleared and grubbed. and the stumps Mall be disposed of of a suitable off -sit. location. A9 tress beyond the construction limits Mall be maintained. 7. See Architectural plane far building dimensions and layout NOTE Survey Information Mown an this plan was obtained from survey plot by Paul Morcotte, revised March 19, 1971. GRAPHIC SCALE eoW ernd� (pWQT) t tees . 30 fU ADDITION & RENOVATION TO: SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON OVERALL SITE PLAN aa.4 f119 At 1.Yorm Date Ch'k'd Revision §UELBURNE ROAD soOUR Drawn by .)dam' bats 4-20-98 SHEET chedmed by JUL Score I• - 30• � CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SHELBURNE, VERMONT /�� Approved by -ML Project No. 92135.1 l� PREPINISHED GRAVEL STOP 3 WALL BEYOND 4 PREFlNISHED METAL PANELS A A PREFlNISHED METAL GRAVEL STOP A-4 SIGNAGE By On S PPWOE 2. BLOCKING A-S FOR FUTURE SIGNAGE = MA 3 A - A-� 1 INSULATED METAL PANELS ... -.... r.. ................. .........® ter-m-•o#--- South ---Eilur-14ngtom G - ----------------- I ALUMINUM EXT. FRAMING SYSTEu WITH 1" CLEM GLASS m ID ❑ ❑❑ ❑ STEEL BOUARDS. TYR. - EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION F A-S PREFlNISHED METAL GRAVEL GUARD INSULATED PREFlNISHED _- PREFlNISHED METAL PANELS METAL PANELS,, 1 A-4 RAMSYSTEM W/ UMINUM CL FRAMING 1" CLEAR IND GLASS MING ❑ '� I II a ALUMINUM WINDOWS AS SCHEDULED 4 . NORTH ELEVATION y"RIi. Il" t.ea�t 7 PREFlNISHED METAL PANELS A-S ,"cy Ga�'j o.11y PREf1NISXED METAL GRAVEL GUARD ' E MS INSULATED PREFlNISHED METAL PANELS W/ ALUMIN M FRAMING SYSTEM CLEM INSUL CLASS OVERHEAD SCHEDULED000"S NO. DATE REVISION ELEVATIONS REFEDLLETNlO 3/S°SzLL-P JOINT BACKER PLATE SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FOAM BACKER ROD IF REQUIRED A, SEALANT SOUTH BURLINOTON, VERMONT SOUTH ELEVATION WIEMANN — LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS. INC. 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE COLCHESTER. VERMONT l VERTICAL JOINT DETAIL q_2 SCALE: 3" 1'-0" SCALE 1/8" - 1'-0" DRAWING NO. to, ti L a°Y?� DATE O�-I s-Bz A_ n �, !*+4, DRAWN BY RJL } } p CHECKED BY M fvil �� !m PROJECT 02035 �*a}r N0 K*} CADD PROJ NAME: 02035 35ELEVOI i OWIENANNLA*MPHERE October 20, 1999 Mr. Joe Weith Director of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, Vt. 05403 Architecture & Engineering 30 South Park Drive, Colchester VT 05446 Tel. (802) 655-5020 Fax. (802) 655-6567 E-mail: Architecture@WLAonline.com Re: Saturn/Chrysler/Plymouth - Exterior Lighting - Project #97045 Dear Joe, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on the point by point lighting plan for the above referenced project. LSI has not corrected the plan to reflect existing conditions as requested by you and us. We have gone to RUDD Corporation a leading light fixture manufacture (plan attached). We have reviewed this plan and believe that it reflects all of the existing conditions and the two new wall packs (cut sheet attached) for Chrysler/Plymouth. The plan added the new fixture over the rear door at Saturn. The mounting heights of the pole lights reflect our approval - original for Saturn 24' and the added fixtures for the parking lot (Charlies Tennis Den) approval of 20'. We apologize for the confusion in our previously submitted plan. This new plan seems to reflect existing conditions correctly. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely Ga . Lavigne W ann-Lamphere Architects WA_ � � W�. OCT 2 1 1999 City of So. Btlr[inprt�,oi Square Series Mountings 1-1/2" Close Pole Mount Mounting Code "1" • For PR, AC, OV and VFT Series. • Extruded aluminum mounting arm attaches fixture in a fixed horizontal position to the side of a square pole. A steel backing plate inside the pole secures the fixture. • On 12" housings, the arm measures 1-1/2' L x 2-1/2" H; on 16' and 22' housings, it measures 1-i/2' Lx 4-1/2' H. IFi 20' Fixed Mount Mounting Code "5" • For CF Series only. • Provides optimum tilt above horizontal angle for cutoff optics, where adjustability is not required. • Arm bolts directly to side of square pole; backing plate secures arm in, No nnia Supplied Wall Mount Box Wall Mount Mounting Code "W" • For PR, AC and VFT Series. • Cast aluminum mounting box with gasket attaches in a fixed position t the side of fixture, utilizing threaded mounting studs supplied. • Provided with 4 threaded and closed 1/2' conduit entries. • 150'C minimum supply wire is required. 6" Extended Pole Mount Mounting Code "2" • For PR, AC, OV and VFT Series. • Extruded aluminum mounting arm attaches fixture in a fixed horizontal position to the side of a square pole. A steel backing plate inside the pole secures the fixture. • On 12' housings, the arm measures 6" L x 2-1/2' H; on 16" and 22" housings, the arm measures 6" L x 4-1/2' H. 1/2" Adjustable Fitter Mounting Code "6" • For 12' FS, CF, PM, PN, PR and AC Series. • NPSM threaded end for mounting to 1/2' threaded pipe or junction box. • Allows tilt above horizontal in 5' increments. Round Tube Off -Center Direct Mounting Code "M" Round Tube Off -Center Tenon Mounting Code "K" • For 16" AC and PR Series only. • Fabricated aluminum yoke comprised of round extruded arms and base (M) or cast hub (K) supports fixture housing off -center of pole. • Base (M) fits inside a 4" square pole, and is secured with four 5/16-18 steel screws. • Hub (K) slip -fits over a steel tenon or pole measuring 2-3/8" up to 3" O.D.; secured with eight allen head set screws to prevent rotation. 2" Adjustable Fitter Mounting Code "3" • For FS, CF, PM, PN, CN, PR and AC Series. • Slip -fits over a 2" pole or tenon (2-3/8' O.D.). • Allows tilt above horizontal in 2-1/2' increments, as well as lateral rotation. • Provides enclosed and gasketed internal wiring chamber. • Knockout provided for field -installed photocell accessory. Round Tube Center Direct Mounting Code: "H" Round Tube Center Tenon Mounting Code: "F"' • For 16' OV and OH Series only. • Fabricated aluminum yoke com- prised of round extruded arms and base (H) or cast hub (F) supports fixture housing directly over pole. • Base (H) fits inside a 4" square pole, and is secured with four 5/16-18 steel screws. • Hub (F) slip -fits over a steel or aluminum tenon or pole measuring 2-3/8" up to 3" O.D.. and is secured with eight alien head set screws to prevent rotation. Yoke Mount Mounting Code "4" • For FS, CF, PM, PN, CN, PR and AC Series. • Ideal for wall, ground, roof or wood pole mounting; bolts directly to almost any surface. • Providee with 36" external cord for ease of wiring. • Allows liil above horizontal to any angle, and double locks in 5' increments. Square Tube Center Direct Mounting Code: 4" Pole="C"; 5" Pole="D"; 6" Pole="E" Square Tube Center Tenon Mounting Code: "A" • For OV and OH Series only. • Fabricated aluminum yoke comprised of square extruded arms and base (C or D) or cast hub (A) supports fixture housing directly over pole • Base (C. D or E) fits inside a 4', 5' or 6" scare pole, secured with four 5/16-18 steel screws. (5" or 6' base available with 22" square `ousing only). • Mounlirg hub (A) is secured with eight alien head set screws (supplied) to prevent rotation. The hub slip -tits over a steel or aluminu n tenon measuring 2-3/8" (standard) up to 3" O.D. When mounting 22" square fixtures on fiberglass or aluminum poles, a 3" O.D. steel tenon that mounts inside the pole s required. n Z n 51 Installation Simplified Your efforts installing these fixtures are reduced due to four primary design considerations. The first is that all fixtures come complete with the lamp already inside the fixture. '"►� This eliminates the coordination of lamp shipment and assures you that the right lamp is provided. The second design feature is that most fixtures come with a Ouad-volt ballast of common local voltages.The third is simplicity of mounting designs. For example, with the 2' Adjustable Fitter, just two set screws are needed. And they face you, rather than being located on all four sides of the titter. The fourth feature is the patented "internal" hinging system which automatically positions the lens assembly when it is closed. This requires only two stainless steel screws to secure the lens assembly. Less Wind Loading Computer designed optics using compact lamps and superior heat dissipation techniques allow the compact size of our square housings. Size and shape reduce wind load, resulting in cost savings when determining pole specifications. Ten Reflector Options Ten reflector systems provide the flexibility to accomplish any lighting task in the most optimized manner. Our engineers use the latest computerized design M =12' 'Mini' Housing (blank) =16" or 22' square housing according to wattage Optical Systems AC = Area Cutoff (pg. 67) CF = Cutoff Flood (pg. 61) CN = Narrow Beam Cutoff (pg. 64) FS = Standard Flood (pg. 60) PM = Parabolic Medium (pg. 62) PN = Parabolic Narrow (pg. 63) PR - Parking/Roadway (pg. 66) QV = Quadrate Vertical (pg. 68-69) OH = Quadrate Horizontal (pg. 68-69 VFT- Vertical Forward Throw (pg. 65) techniques and are not satisfied until our reflector systems provide optimum results. This has resulted in our utilizing smaller envelope lamps in some reflectors to achieve the desired optimized results. For example, our AC Series Forward Throw fixture could not have been achieved in the past without the fixture being double its size. However, by using the ED28 i reduced envelope lamp for the 400 watt metal halide and the BT37 i reduced envelope lamp for the 1000 watt metal halide, we were able to develop optical systems that have a forward main beam at 60+ degrees with no fixture tilt, and virtually no back light. This amazing reflector system allows you to light parking lots and tennis courts with minimal spill light onto adjacent properties. The reflector system and adjustable backlight cutoff also allow direct or indirect wall mounted lighting without the typical objectionable wall brightness. Longer Fixture Life All products are standard with our exclusive DeltaGuard finish, featuring an E-coat epoxy primer and a bronze acrylic powder topcoat. The acrylic finish is resistant to the degrading effects of the ultraviolet radiation from the sun and other environmental factors. This assures you that the products you install today will look great in the future as well. We are so confident, we offer a 7-year finish warranty! Lamps 12" housings and 16" Post Top Lights thru 175W MH and 150W HPS accommodate medium base lamps. 16" housings accommodate mogul base lamps (the PM, PN and the AC Series utilize an ED28 i reduced envelope lamp for 40OW MH fixtures). 22" housings accommodate mogul base lamps (the QV Square Tube Post Top and VFT Series utilize a ED28 i reduced envelope lamp for 40OW MH fixtures; the PM, PK AC, VFT and OV Square Tube Post Top Series utilize a BT37 i reduced envelope lamp for 1000W MH fixtures). Weather -tight Housing The aluminum housing is manufactured with the latest die casting technology. This unique styling allows straight wall sections. The die cast door frame has a high temperature silicone gasket and high impact strength tempered glass lens. The lens frame is supplied with mounting holes for field -installed accessories. For the VFT Series, a clear sag lens (acrylic on 250-40OW and glass on 1000W) is used and lens frame is supplied with mounting clips for the Backlight Shield accessory. For the Square Tube Post Top, all horizontal lamp and 50-175W Square Series Catalog Number Logic NOTE: Sroduct pages for aVaUpbility. Mountings 0 = Direct i = 1-1/2" Close Pole 2 = 6' Extended Pole 3 = 2' Adjustable Fitter 4 = Yoke 5 = 20' Fixed 6 = 1/2' Adjustable Fitter 8 = Without Mounting (hardware) (factory -drilled) A = Square Tube Center Tenon C = Square Tube 4" Center Direct (for 4' pole) D = Square Tube 5" Center Direct (for 5' pole) E = Square Tube 6' Center Direct (for 6" pole) F = Round Tube Center Tenon H = Round Tube Center Direct K = Round Tube Off -Center Tenon M = Round Tube Off -Center Direct U=_104ect Wall (uptight) W = Wall (includes wall mount box) ©IIM KL Wattages 03 = 35W (HPS only) 05 = 50W 07 = 70W 10 = t 00W 15 = 150W 17 =775W (MH only) 25 = 250W 40 = 40OW 92 = 250W (22' housing) 94 = 40OW (22' housing) 99 = 1000W (22' housing) 95 = 150OW (22" housing) (MH only) Lamps/Ballasts 4 = Metal Halide `; = High Pressure Sodium vertical lamp are supplied with a clear, flat tempered glass lens; 250-40OW HPS and 250-1000W MH vertical lamp have a sag tempered glass lens. Structural Integrity Internal ribbing is designed into the housing to distribute structural loads. This allows the fixture to be mounted in any operating position without any wall distortion. Typical fixture leaks are eliminated. The internal structure also prevents fatigue failure of the housing. Ballasts All fixtures are standard with a high power factor ballast. The majority of Flood/Area fixtures are supplied with a multi -volt ballast. In the U.S., the standard ballast includes 120, 208, 240 and 277 volts; in Canada, the standard ballast includes 120, 277 and 347 volls (some wattages are standard with a 120/277V dual -volt ballast). Wiring 150°C minimum supply wire is required for wall mounted fixtures. Labels UL Listed in U.S. and Canada for wet locations, and enclosure classified IP54 and/or IP65 per IEC 529 and IEC 598. Voltages 1 = 120V 2 = 277V 3 = 208V 4 = 240V 5 = 480V 6 = 347V (Canada only) D = Dual -volt (120/277V) M = Quad-volt(120/208/240/277V) T = Tri-volt (120/277/347V) (Canada only) NOTE: D, M or T voltage suffix are factory set at highest voltage. C C v 53 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. and McLean Holding Corporation, Vermont corporations with their principal places of business in South Burlington, Vermont ("Owners") are the owners of certain property consisting of 5.0 acres of land more or less presently owned by J.W.J. Realty, Inc. and .5 acres of land more or less presently owned by McLean Holding Corporation, at 1085, 1089 & 1095 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, the Owners obtained approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission (the "Commission") on May 27, 1997 for a planned unit development (the "PUD") on a plat entitled "Plat of Boundary Adjustment, Properties of J.W.J. Realty, Inc. and McLean Holding Corporation, So. Burlington, VT," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated April, 1997, and recorded in the Map Book at Page of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Commission's approval imposes certain conditions on the Property. NOW THEREFORE, Owners hereby give notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon the land unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor; 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission granted on May 27, 1997, as set forth in Findings of Fact dated June 17, 1997, and applicable prior approvals of the Commission. 2. Except as set forth herein, the Property is and shall constitute a single parcel of land for purposes of compliance with City of South Burlington regulations and ordinances now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning and subdivision regulations. Except as set forth herein, Owners covenant and agree that for purposes of compliance with and application of City of South Burlington ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, the Property shall continue to be regarded as a single parcel of land, even if the buildings located on such property are conveyed to separate owners together with the lots on which such buildings are located. 3. The Property shall be treated as two separate parcels of land for purposes of the City of South Burlington's Sign Regulations now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted. 4. Any future application for an amendment or modification affecting one or more of the parcels comprising the PUD shall be deemed an amendment or modification to the PUD as a whole, and the Commission shall evaluate and render a decision in the context of the entire PUD, not merely on the impacts as they relate to the parcel(s) for which the amendment or modification is specifically proposed. 5. Nothing in this Notice or the condition or covenant contained herein shall be construed to prevent conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer of any interest in and to any one of the subdivided parcels as separate and apart from the rest of the parcels comprising the PUD. 6. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be any owner of any parcel. The City shall act upon any application submitted by an owner and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the owners as to the respective rights of the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners to notify all others having an interest in the property that may be affected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 7. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning and subdivision, or sign regulations, against the Property, or activities or events occurring on the Property, shall be brought against the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners to notify all others having an interest in the Property that may be affected by the enforcement proceedings or the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief of penalties, shall be enforceable against any owners made a party to such enforcement proceeding. 8. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 9. This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the Owners and the Owners' successor and assigns. 2 Dated this kday of June, 1997. IN PRESENCE OF: /Z� Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. J.W.J. RE Y, INC. By. It ly Authorized Agent MCLEAN DING CORPORATION By: /�G7? I ,Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this >` day of June, 1997, personally appeared �-� duly authorized agent for J.W.J. Realty, Inc., and e acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribe , to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of 7.77. .7. Realty, Inc. 'l f. E ^F it �' ONT CC uN'"Y OF C :ITTENDEN, SS. P_ South Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this day f une, 1997, personally appeared C� duly authorized agent for McLean Holding Corporati , and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of McLean Holding Corporation. F:\WPDOCS\SAVOIE\SITEPLAN.APP Wlemann _ Lamphere Architects - .Inc. Fax Transmittal Date: To:�7 Fax Number:" 7 7 1511, Re: W LA Job # 1113 lax is a rotas Of . ^ � page($), EXCLUDING THIS PAGE. If any pages are missing, please notify us at (802) 555--So2o. From. Fax: (802) 65 567 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 655- 5020 .-{ .. interior Sec .:.......... ..... .: : Thra4 !,000 watt Super Metal Heide luminaires {l ; .0h veflicidl brats 10.mps. I .:;'*1�nSlr9a are vienlsd 120 d4grs$s #pan, W!!: ' forward Virow roflactcos. 3 I l.�s`nina;l l are ? ounlad, or ! l a 24` 1ourid straight 6t401 1. ?,yes itclude base Cove, 5 and (Anchor b09. ' i'v ontlre 1$ Ani.aad in plaiihum polyester gov:der coatf%� 'c3ss n e lnterloc ooa !r.0 a; thermai robin for ccrryslon rasistarce• Two 1,000 watt Super Metal Halide luminaires with vorVcal bum 14m;$. Lu minalroi are ortant24 160 dogroes &pert, with forew throw type roA4ators. LumlrWres art mounted an #-Vr?our,d altr`aaight stool polo. poles Inch do bah a covsrs end anchor bolts. e ntiro assornbty is finished in p4llnvaipo!yeztor pow0er ocaiing. Pies have interior 903110$ of thermal ral In .'cr Commlon resistaa". One 1,0W ` om sup6rmetal Ha11de lvirlraaire w th vertloal born Imp. The lumina;re is post -top mounted with at ware TY04 t/ symmetrit„al actor. Lunslrta.ro Is rnoun,ed on a 221 round straight steel pale w!th a 21 oonwetts de s- tyli t t;misi �d'oy when Poles irtlu4:W base oovim and anchor bolts. Entire s",onibly !$ flnishad 'in platir ut", polyester powdor coatirV, Potes 1,awe tr,lorlor coating of themal resin for oorrosion restt3wce. Site 110-dUr;; li xti✓r�}e t�?s to 1,00 wsStt ;SUPW/M,.getAll HsAdeJ iywrni-halm. Site Sha3be,080'and•A+$6i3 ij^.dn C'iLmin�r',9 i:y ;� ,w7 is i! 17 91� ittrng4. i?Caiarr?q 9f°$'t t39" ti alrtertip' i' deep. Wft'r'.S' x 1;'ate l44 clr,.urrferent,al rove at, The ions si^ail ba 311 so t'h�k s;te6r, ?arnp4f!W sag at-7sa crs Which extends •1,T oeis:wbottom of f'onure ho"N. it t9ps Shag be 36died :ilia a Gait ;rttumt.r4m do0r trw" w*'k Seoursd to 10ho fixture �S ry W-"Ih stay.*" Vogl s..a 1.1y8 1vow's. 'lx;vro gfi. 4? hAv-% At `rer°.lraa<i t.r!', lip p*011or9 WIWI ,! fo;ward Ar w,,annd S-quaroTypoVtefe?. uwo :hro-v wgd-pv 6r41 W raEat'-1.6 cy;" front /o 7►P•9ni'��iF��Bf i18 '8i'ta:ors s�- a be A-wm050%. of ""'W t0e-' +tj St;;,� ovttt8soi3, laA103 shai. b# high power 3s;tgr. rfpa CYA f .a 10 Two 1,000 w*tt Super 16 Mee 40& luminitires wlf.?t yor#oai WM lomps. Luminstires are orlenlod ISO degrsas apart, wit? beard ` thlvw two tow -tars. The refledor in each Wrninalrasr is to be rotated to ftl light from both lim-rest Is dlret%4d Wward d" lot. 1 Lurn'arlaims ire rrsoe f%W! on rC>ar'+d st4ght stssi !4. ?Wise lt'tCitr * base oovers and anchor bolts. En ira assembly is flniShod In platinum rpClsty powdo' coatlrg, Poles oati.N of owmal resin dom*v rusistano4. or* 1,0W watt $t r +',+total l�{aade 1t1ntinsVrO pt Y-snical >>u WV,. Ths lunninafre Is tide- rY►oi;rsl,>ad vWth sA forward throw typo ref octoe. Lwnirtaire is rnotinted on a 24'round straight ,ate*! 0o, Polas ir,dt,a4 base �xNers andtor Dolts. The 4rttlre sasarnbiy is finished In pi4.tlrwt>'o 46141' powdw +: lltinQ. ales hoe interior 4;46tin0 of thermal sesltl for designed ta; r m1nus 20 ogroes %hrenhsit operation, Ballast comp eri iliall Maur t8d ;art a rsmovstm tray. Flx!uto shall bo U. How ice wet tAta ac r , t'.nls?� on r, i*ra3 atrW be DuraOrip, a bake on polyester ;+:,wdaratinq 2.S m tl�ic.'lcrts►sa, w, th five-year ii sit tinls.`r viast 'lt�; 4•;�, 33 !'rxturo i.'tan be plaSiTtvm, with tt'a hoL*:- r6++ON erntarr,�rg A rz 'restir 2' rid baled. The red band shall L p ap• t�SB��, aotor !n+� to Fwaltont PomtutaGuide 747XR.T- ~rte;�rrting err s; a'i w s° A r � s,, r lair sltA,ir,�trtvrn with round, s.wlwr1 a� f;�!+�a '*; 3;:1ti.'�� !�i,'�8g,'. POO 4)409 be 14' or rs rt,: st' ,* t.i�tw t �%rjt)rip Pk3 polyeeaalr powder Coat f)Ws' piat *.vm Yor ;, Y 3a ih*l b4 gwstn?atr !n3 Ink-kness on 11 oxtc-flu n a. d;Q;o' t4i=:' : ihalrr4 plarstlo i ydtocartjon tos!n cow; appnod to ;he'ntex;l;r of the pats. ,,'Y- 4-92 MON FAX COVER SHEET 0&1a&,C1V en C/ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 20 Kimball Ave., Suite 102 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Telephone: (802) 658-4044 Fox (802) 658-5657 DATE: _- u L 19 ATTN : FROM: MESSAGE: CC17_ _1#1 .SuA"Jety Alt-0je-6-r- A d W AF Gil.%, 4- D. YW_ _ SYGNE . ANSWER REQUIRED: YES A.S.A.P. NO, NUMBER OF PAGES: � ( INCLUDING COVER SHEET It you do not receive the number of pages indicated or you have trouble with the transaction please call and inform us. r-1- i— r3 .- 9 2 F fR I S: 0 -1 cl- Throe 1,000 watt Super Moiat Halide luminaires with vertical burn letups. Lufiinalres are oriented 120 dagroos tparl, with forward throw refectors, Luminalras are mounted on a 24' round straight steel pole. Poiss include base covers and anchor bolts. The entire Assembly is finished In piatlnurn polyester powder coating. Poles have intorlbr coating of thermal rosin for corrosion resistance. interior SCC Two t.cyoo watt Super Metal Halide luminalres with vOrtlCal burn lamps. Luminaires ere oriented 180 degrees apart, with forward throw type reflectors. Luminaires are mounted on a 24' round straight steel pole. Poles Include base covers and anchor bolts. Enure assembly to finished in platinum pofyestar powder coating. Poles have interior coating of thermal rosin for corrosion rssistanm L` one 1,000 watt Super Metal Mande luminalre with ve.lical bum tamp. The lurnlntiro is post -top mounted with a Sqquare T pa V s:yymmetricat reflector, umInaire Is mtuntAd on a 22' round atratght Sieoi p�io with sit 2' oonorete . dos- taI ttumistied by othors Poles includa base covets and anchor bolts. Entlrs assembly is finished lr') platinum polyester powder coating. Polo$ have Intortor coating of thermal rosin for corrosion resistance. Sito lighting fixture to be 1,000 watt Super Metal Halide Ivrrinalre, s:ixturo shall bo .080" one-pplaco spun 211uminum nou!�in with integral flange, HowsIng shelf be20"diameterbyI*rdtep,with �*x1/Vdeep circumfaro^tial reveal. The fens shall be 3/t 0" thick clear, tempered sap glass tons which axionds 2.1,'2' below bottom; of fix<uro housing. The lens shall be sealed into at cast afuminurt door frame which Is secured to the fixture housing with statrtast V6610011va screws, Future shad have tvar'.lcai burn ttzr,p positlonwlth lniercha�nbabie forward throw, and Square Type V eY'irnetrloAl refle, ors. The for- ward throw reflector shall b4 rotatable on the front row asstrnblias. Th" reflectors shall be modular drep•In assemblies, of dls-fcrn1, lock tab ("onstrOlcn, Fixture shali have Woolialn socket with gprlr�- relnforced contacts, Satiant cha" b4 high power factor. typo CV+iA t I j Two 1 000 watt Super Matat Raftde Iumtrta 0S /� with vsrttca,I bum loops, A Luminaires are oriented t 80 degrees apart, w11A forwstrd ` throw type r*4dors. The reflector to each lut'nirtaire is to be rotated to that fight from both fixtures it directed toward tko tot. Luminaires are mounted on a 24' round straight steel pole. Poles Include base covers and anchor bolts. Entire assembly is Bni"d to platinum riyester powder coating. Poles havo interior Coating of thermal rosin for corrosion resistance, One t,0o0 watt Super Met. Hand# luminsire with vertkn tamp, The luminaire Is side mounted with a forward thr type reflector. t umUialre Is mounted on a 24''round sir stew pole. Poles 6.luds br covert and andw bolts. T' entire juambty 1st llnished platinum potyostar powder Coating. Poles gave lnterto+ cAatina of thermal resin for %. I'V' �60W designod for minus 20 degrees lahrenheit operation. Ballast comp vents :hell s e iroxlled on a rernovabte tray. Flxture shall be U. 11,ggd for fie'. lacatlon$. Flnlsh W fixturb SW be DvraGrlp, a bake 4n pniyaster powder coating 2.9 mil thickness, with five•yoar ilmitt liaise; w2n'anty. Color of (lxture shag be platinum, with the housir. reveal oontaining s Contraeti 2' red band. The red band shall t PM.S No.17960, ac�cardlrgto P"tons fSormuta Guide 747XR. Tr rno4gnting Arrr shall be 3" >t x 4` rectwg ulsr aWninum with round( corners and future mat:.htng revolt). VNI 00 ShO be 24' of c. rov- straight stflel with CluraorSp Pkte eatyotter pander coat finis` five mR thtc rla'?ru., color. Fins!% sheet ba gu�nte�edd fcnass on t) exterior of ih,e pole. with a tl+ermal pfask a hydmart0on rosin coati! applied to she interior of tho pole. P _ 0 3 l 11 9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS taw Minl•flood luminare 1 100 watt Metal Halic lamp. Ballast is a6cl itx burled box below 4rade. Adjustable fly hoad projects light i automobile on displ pad. Luminare is finished in anodiz-ed bronze. L2+•9AruaN-.W2•%.9M COrrp08ita G(rsCt Burlttt turninalre w+th 1,00 watt Metal Nallds Same, The lurninalr4 is mounted Plus` with gramme level, i h,) wall wath raiteOor projmta light onto building 1@464. LuminaJra Is fir,ishad in textured arrhitecturai bronco 0 One 400 watt Supv Metal Hellde W", , Nt;usl% It Ong p(8Ce welded aluminum with riveted vccass door for aasy lamp replacement. Luminzir6 tan be .,tat toe precis aiming, Lens 4 heat -resistant tetnpared glass. 11 SOal. LSt t.*HTIKCi SYb" VMS, A t1W&!" pt 0i trdt str4c try, So0W ALUAW,d AChR s p.o, i9,Ji FAX (60) 7W147 ett14>r f,t tas�na,y sY+ten- MEMORANDUM To: Bernie O'Rourke From: Joe Weith, Director, Planning & Zoning Subject: Lighting at Chrysler/Plymouth/Saturn - 1095 Shelburne Road Date: August 31, 1999 I have reviewed the proposed point by point lighting plan dated 6/24/99 for the above referenced property and compared it to the currently approved lighting plan. I have several questions that I would like answered prior to deciding whether or not to approve this plan. 1. The lot summary information indicates an average footcandle of 4.9 +/-. Why is +/- indicated? I have never seen this before. The calculation of average footcandle should be an exact number. The exact average footcandle calculation should be provided without a +/- . 2. I would like the plan to clearly indicate the type of light fixture existing on the property and used in the point by point lighting plan. Cut -sheets should be provided for each light fixture including a picture of the fixture, wattage, lighting type, height, and other pertinent information. The shoe box fixtures that were installed are not consistent with the cut -sheets that were submitted with the currently approved plan. Why is this? 3. The proposed plan shows six (6) additional lighting fixtures plus the two (2) fixtures you are proposing to mount on the west side of the Chrysler/Plymouth building. How can all of these lighting fixtures be added without an increase in average footcandles on the property? Two (2) fixtures have already been installed along the north property line without approval. 4. There are several building mounted lighting fixtures along the west side of the Saturn building that were never approved. These fixtures either need to be removed or shown and incorporated in the point by point lighting plan. If you are seeking approval for these fixtures, details and cut - sheets will need to be submitted. 5. A note on the previously approved plan indicated that mounting height of light fixtures would be 20'. The proposed plan indicates that mounting height will be 24'. The maximum height allowed by City standards is 20'. The note on the proposed plan should be changed to reflect this. 6. The proposed plan indicates that the light level in several locations directly under two light fixtures is 26 - 30 footcandles. However, in other areas directly under two light fixtures, the light level is only 3.2 footcandles. How can this be when the same light fixture is used? Bernie O'Rourke Page 2 August 31, 1999 7. In the lot summary information, why does the maximum footcandle go down in the proposed plan compared to the currently approved plan? Also, why does the total number of points increase? The property has remained the same. Only the points existing on the property should be used when calculating average footcandles. 8. Why have the light levels directly under existing fixtures gone down between the proposed plan and the currently approved plan? Please address these questions in writing. I look forward to your responses. Cc: Ray Belair (bob-3 I) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant Wiemann Lamphere Architects 2) Name of Subdivision JWJ Realty 1085, 1089, 1095 Shelburne Road 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application none 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: none 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and cpntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations or minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a s vision. c (Signat e a pli t or contact person ate MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning Re: March 9, 1999 agenda items Date: March 5 , 1999 2) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING'S REPORT Enclosed are the Findings of Fact and Decisions for the following site plan applications: a) Site plan application of Rocheleau Land Development, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 26,099 square foot building for multiple industrial uses (12,000 square feet for warehouse & wholesale, 5433 square feet for warehouse and 8666 square feet for light manufacturing), 16 Gregory Drive. The amendment consists of revising the parking layout to add four (4) spaces. APPROVED b) Site plan application of David Flagg to amend a previously approved site plan for a 4,608 square foot building for auto service and auto/marine sales, 10 Gregory Drive. The amendment consists of: 1) enlarging the dumpster storage area, 2) revising condition #7 of the 5/25/93 approval regarding the construction of a sidewalk, and 3) adding two (2) parking spaces. APPROVED 3) WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - ADDITION- REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 square foot addition to one (1) of the buildings. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 9/23/97. The sketch plan was reviewed on 2/9/99 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road lies within the CI District. It is bounded on the west by Fayette Road, on the south by L&M Park, on the east by Shelburne Road, and on the north by Hannaford Plaza and a cemetery. 1 Memorandum - Planning March 9, 1999 agenda items March 5, 1999 Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 38 foot signalized driveway on Shelburne Road. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coveraze/setbacks:; Entire PUD: Building coverage is 11.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 63 spaces are required for customers and employees and a total of 63 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces are provided. A bike rack is provided for each building. Landscaping: The maximum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $1500 which is being met. Proposed plantings include Birch. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate 174 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the current facility to generate 77.9 vte's and with the proposed addition to generate 79.9 vte's which is a 2.0 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be $0. Lighting_ The floodlight on the north side of the Chrysler -Plymouth building must be removed and the four (4) round lights on the west side of the building must also be removed since they are not being used. If the applicant wishes to install building mounted lights, details of these lights should be submitted and the original point -by -point lighting study will need to be updated. 4) FRANK IRISH - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT This project consists of subdividing a 39.96 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 6.25 acres (lot #1), 5.5 acres (lot #2), and 28.21 acres (lot #3). Lot #2 is developed with a farm stand and lot #1 is 2 DRAFT- 3/9/99 MOTION OF APPROVAL WIEMANN - LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 square foot addition to the southern building, as depicted on a plan entitled, "South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth South Burlington, Vermont." prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, dated 1/29/99, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 2.0 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as to not cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director) prior to installation. The flood light on the north side of the Chrysler -Plymouth building shall be removed and the four (4) round flood lights on the west side of the building shall also be removed. if the applicant wishes to install building mounted lights, details of these lights shall be submitted along with an updated point -by -point lighting study. Light details and lighting study shall require approval of the Director. 4. The applicant shall post a $1500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the addition. 6. Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission. 7. The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 5, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 9, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 9 FEBRUARY 1999 comments were forthcoming. 4. Sketch plan application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a previously approved plan for a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 sq. ft. of automobile sales and service use in two buildings. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 sq. ft. addition to one of the buildings, 1085, 1089 & 1095 Shelburne Rd: Mr. O'Rourke stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Lavigne identified the property as the Chrysler -Plymouth facility. The expansion will provide a covered entrance to the service facility. The addition will have the same siding as the Saturn Building. The applicant showed a rendering of what the building will look like with the addition. Mr. Weith asked about a landscape plan. The applicant said they will have one. Mr. Weith asked about the floodlights in back of the building and on the north of the building. The applicant said the two on the back have been disconnected and will be removed. They will check on the other one. No other issues were raised. Mr. O'Rourke rejoined the Commission. 5. Public Hearing: Final plat application of Highlands Development Company, LLC & JAM Golf, LLC to amend a planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18-hole golf course, Dorset Street. The amendment consists of resubdividing 12 lots on Golf Course Road and Holbrook Road: Mr. Marshall said the plat is similar to sketch plan. He showed the road system and the originally approved lot lines. Some of the original lots will be reduced in depth, but this will not affect buildable area of these lots. The new plan creates a 60 ft. right-of-way between lots 86 and 87 which could be used in the future as access to the back property if it were to be developed. Mr. Dinklage said he was concerned and angry that the recreation M3 Vermont National Bank City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Attn: Joseph Weith 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Sir: April 22, 1999 Irrevocable Letter of Credit #99-2111 We hereby establish in your favor an Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the account of JWJ Realty, Inc. of South Burlington, Vermont up to an aggregate amount of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and no cents ($4,500.00), effective immediately. This Letter of Credit will expire on November 1, 2000. Payment under this Letter of Credit will be made to you upon presentation of the following documents: 1. Sight Draft drawn on the Vermont National Bank for the amount of payment claimed, bearing the clause "Drawn under Vermont National Bank Letter of Credit #99-2111." 2. Evidence that the City of So. Burlington has given JWJ Realty, Inc. 15 days prior notice of its intent to draw on the Letter of Credit by Certified Mail. Draft to Vermont National Bank must be accompanied by signed statement stating that JWJ Realty, Inc. has defaulted on work in connection with a project on Shelburne Road in South Burlington which is described in a three party Letter of Credit Agreement dated April 22, 1999. Unless otherwise expressly stated, this Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs & Practices for Commercial Documentary credits fixed by the International Chamber of Commerce (1993 Revision), ICC Publication No. 500 and is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code of Vermont, as from time to time amended. We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers and bona fide holders of drafts, in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit that such drafts will be honored upon due presentation at Vermont National Bank. /dmj Sincerely, g't 1� �4 kt- Brian M. Meyer Vice President Commercial Loans P.O. Box 1308, 150 Bank Street, Burlington, VT 05402-1308 802-863-89W 802-863-8933 fax 4 Printed on recycled paper CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT Site Plan Letter of Credit Agreement THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, between JWJ Realty, Inc. of South Burlington, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and Vermont National Bank, hereinafter referred to as "Bank", and .the City of South Burlington, Vermont, hereinafter referred to as "municipality", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received final site plan approval from the Municipality's Planning Commission for the development of property located at 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road, So. Burlington, Vermont as depicted on a site plan entitled, " South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth and additions and renovations to Saturn of South Burlington, VT", drawing L1.0 dated 4/20/98. WHEREAS, Developer is required by said Approval. at its own expense, to complete the construction of the development site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the Developer for the work as set forth above; and, WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of issuer of the Letter of Credit hereinafter specified. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: Drawing and specifications dated March 15, 1999 as prepared by Wiemann & Lamphere Architects project #99005. 2. Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than November 1, 1999. 3. Developer shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the Page 2 improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the Developer that the construction is complete. 4. For the guarantee of Developer's performance of all requirements hereunder set forth, Developer has caused the Bank to issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the Municipality, the original of which is attached to the Municipality's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the Developer's copy of this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, Developer shall cause the attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof. Failure of Developer to deliver evidence of such renewal to the Municipality thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of said Letter of Credit shall constitute a default of the terms of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, must be accompanied by a written statement signed by a duly authorized agent of the Municipality, that in the judgment of the Municipality, the Developer is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in anticipation of payment for materials, labor and services required for completion of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at sight when presented to the Bank by the Municipality, the payment limited only the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Letter of Credit. If Developer shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its failure to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the Municipality shall notify Developer by certified mail of said default. Developer shall then within three (3) business days provide Municipality with evidence of said renewal of Letter of Credit or Municipality may notify Bank of such default and request payment under said Letter of Credit. 6. The Developer and Municipality hereby agree that the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500.00), shall be sufficient to secure Developer's obligations under this Agreement but shall not relieve Developer from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above - stated cost. 7. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of any draft it submits to the Bank. The consent of the Developer to payment of said draft by Bank to the Municipality under said Letter of Credit shall not be required. Page 3 8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the Developer, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to do so. 9. All funds drawn on the Bank by Municipality pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the Municipality for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted for by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed by the Municipality's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in such other manner as in the judgment of the Municipality shall accomplish the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the Bank by the Municipality pursuant to said Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the Municipality's needs, any such excess amount shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank, to be credited by said Bank to the Developer. 11. This Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completion of the one year warranty period as described in the above Paragraph 3. If the Municipality has not delivered any written notice to the Developer of any defective or improper work or materials in the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the Developer, the Municipality shall forthwith notify the Bank in writing that the Letter of Credit may be cancelled, and shall return the original Letter of Credit to the Bank, and both the Developer and the Bank shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said Letter of Credit. 12. The Bank may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the Municipality. 13. Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Bank harmless from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by Bank of this Letter of Credit, including attorney's fees, as long as Bank follows the terms and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 14. This Agreement shall be binding on all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Dated at So. Burlington, Vermont this 22"d day of April, 1999. Page 4 In Presence of: In Presence of: In Presence of: l C- �tJ� JWJ Realty, Inc. By: Its Dull: uthorized Agent r: Vermont National Bank By. , V /f J1.? c ( , Its Duly Authorized Agent City of South Burlington By: C� , t 1j!)1'— Its Duly Authoriz d Agent .l -4 vas AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate betweon w, ii.`�_ _�.w of ,� T_ �. hPreinaf ti;_: ._�.. ref errd to as "DEUELOPER'�,� �/{, M: � � ,�/ l � � - � of € hereinafter referred to as „"Bank", an �^j ,;,� 11 , hereinafter referred to aS . W x T N E S S E T F? WEEREAS, Developer hail received final. subdivision approval -clCtn the MUNjC'jPAY,ITY'a PlannI Ig Commission for the development. of a e,,xbdivision consisting of _ lots with ri3tF�Ci Improvements, in a development to be mown as ✓, >'r.­C 17. ,4 !/, �, • �, - -- � r as depicted oti and n a �c4rrari e with the sped r.icatl.ons as Set forth on Sheet. of on the final plat plan entitled "_ _ - 0' dated prepared by as raged �.iiBook pages the Land Records of the City of South Burlington; WHEREAS, DEVELOPER is required by said approval, at l.ts own expense, to complete the construction of the development Site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commis ion; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement Irish to establish a mechanism to secure the obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANS, executes this Agreement 501ely in the capacity of 44.asuer of a Letter of Credit hereinafter specified; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby Covenant and agree',a.s follows: 1. DEVELOPER will, at itv. own. expense, ct;mplete the foll-ow .r_g construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications get forth in said final. plat and related documents y 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1 no later than (Post-ita Fax Note 7671 Date pages FrorK CO3Mf4pt ^- Co. Fhorc _r� Phone b 3. DEVELOPER ahall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within one year after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shah be deemed to have occux-red. when the MUNICIPALITY has i."pected and approved the construction of all the Improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the Construction is Complete. 4. ',For th,!� guarantee of DEVELOPER's performance of all requir.em+arts hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the BANK to ia8u a .its Irrevocabie Letter of Credit in favor of the MUNICIPALITY, the original of which is attached to the MUNICIPALI:TY's copy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is attached to the DEVELOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the tarns of thin Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the ,attached Letter of Credit to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereot. Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such renewal to MUNICIPALITY thirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of. said Letter of Credit shall constitute z default of the term; of this Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said crradit, must be accompanied by a written statement Signed by a duly au'_Aorized agent of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the Judgement of the MUNICIPALITY, the DEVELOPED, is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft are in payment for, or in antic,ipat.lon of payment for matara.a? s, Labor and service.5 required .for completion of the improvements Identified in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be grade at g.iaht when resented to the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY, the paynenr_ limited only by the aggregate amounts presented in relationship to the maximum amount of the Lettex of Credit- if DEVELOPER shall be in default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because of its 1=aileare to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the ?CJNICIPALtTY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified mail of said default. DEVELOPER shall then. within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evil n.cc Of said renewal of Latter of Credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BAMK of such default and, request payment under said Letter of Credit, 6. Vfte DEVELOPER and MUNICIPALITY hereby agree that the sum of shah be suf dicient to Secare DEVELOPER's ob:iga}ions u.ndev this Agreement but shall not relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay any additional costs, if actual costs exceed the above -stated cost. 7. The MUNICIPALITY will promptly submit to the DEVELOPER a Cop,- of any draft it submits to the BATIK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft by SANK to the muNICIPALITY 2 S. she I-RMICIPALIT`I shall not file with the BANK a Statement of Default uzxtil ten (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPERe by certified Nail, setting forth its intention to do sa. 9. All. funds drawn, on the BA.NX by the M. LINICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for the purpose of completing construction of the improvements identified in Paragraph I. Any work contracted for by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant hereto shall, be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basisr or shall be performed by the MtlNICIPALIT 's own work force and equipment, or shall be accomplished in siich other manner a$ in the Judgement of the MUNICIPALITY shall accomplJ sh the work more expeditiously and economically. 10. If payments are drawn on the BANK by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to said Latter of credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the monies drawn are in excess of the VdjNICIPALITY' S neads, any such excess amount shell be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BA.N'K, to be credited by said BANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. This ,Agreement and said Letter of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effect upon completior. of the one year warranty period as described .in the abovs Paragraph 3. If the MIT41CIPALITY has not delivered any writt.on notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or improper work or materials In the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or -if notice has been given and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the MUNICIPALITY shall forthwith notify the BANK in writing that the Letter of Credit may be canceled, and shall return the original. Letter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEVELOPER and the BANK shall be relaased from d1l obligations hereunder and Bander said Letter of Credit. 1.2. Upon request of DEVELOPER, but only at the sal+ discretion of the MUNICIPALITY, the MUNICIPALITY may agree to reduce the amount of said Letter of Credit required hereunder if the MUNICIPALITY believes that the full amount of said Letter, of Credit is no longer necessary to protect its interest, and shall notify the BAM in writing of such reduction In the amount, of the Letter of Credit. 13. The BANK may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of the MUNICIPALITY. 14. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK harmloos from all claims, causes of action or liability of any kind arising out of this Agreement or the issuance by BANK of this ,Letter of Credi -, Including attorney's fees, as long as BANK follows the terms and conditi.on5 outlined in said Letter of Credit. 3 15. This Agr pent shall be binding on - _� parties hereto and their respective neirs, executors, administi. orfs, successors and assigns. Dated at -v., , Vermont, this 6`�day of ZIP T L PRESENCE OF: By: ul` Authorized Agent (DEVELOPER) Dated at .,Tim/A; r�,6/'j Vermont, this day of .._J:Uj1�� � , a 199y_. Da"d at ---, / f- - , /'�Le ti IN PRESENCE OF: V Duly Authors ed Agent ($ ) Vermont, this day of By: _ Duly uthorize Agent ( ICI PALITY ) 4 I .f.� .4, .if.:+r sue'' �.+� '*a ,1" A.✓ T Z° exe .sited in triplicate between , _ na f to;e _. refe--rad to of 5 �hereiEL�JF� f��✓�1�./�r�. of hereinafter referred to as "1 Bank", an `,,, , hereinafter referred to as wl,; AEAS, Developer hav received final, subdivision apprOval from . ae M.11,NICIPAI,TTY S Planning Commission for the davt* .Jopment of a sjtbwt:iwision consisting of '.__ lots with re,latF.:d improvements, i r av 6 opment to Y,)e Ynown as ,was depicted oil a Rr.in c nce wIth the specification,' asset forth can Sheet. of an the final plat plan entitled dated prepared by rf%, .or-i--d N 13o6i — Pages __. of tho Land Records of the City of South Burlington; WHEREAS, DEVELOPER ,is required by said approval, at '.ts owr, rxpolkse, to caTpplete the construction of the development:, site in accordance with the plan approved by the Planning Commission; and wmi',R :AS, the parties to this AgroeMent wish to establish a m,rir,ha.n o sm to secure "',he obligations of the DEVELOPER for the work as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the BANK executes this Agreement solely in this capacl.ty of iastser of a better of Credit hereinafter specified; Now, MREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: '.. DEVE1,0PRR will, at its cWn exPense, of;mplet e the fol xoWi g construction as depicted and in accordance with the speci.f ica.tions set forth in said final plat and related documents - A" x 2, The Developer shall complete the., iMprrvement s set forth in Paragraph 3 no later than t' - / - k 0 � ---- - - . Post -it° Fax dote 7671 Date P&191 _ Fro Co./UHpt. ,,cL� Co. Phora /� -n � Phore # — - 3. DEVELOPER Shall replace Or rep4l-r any defective or improper word' or materials which may be recognized within one year atter cl,orrpletlon of the i,mpr.ovoments set forth in Paragraph 1. For the purpose of thIs Agreement "compl e-tion" shall be deemed to have occurred when, the ToffJ 11C:"IPALI:TY has inspected and approved the construction of all the Improvements required by this Agreement and i€trued written, notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is C0111P F'tu . 4. For the guaraxlt ee of' DEVELO ER ` s perf orinance of all requirements hereunder set forth, DEVELOPER has caused the EAN'R to iStve Its Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the MU-NICIPALITY, the original, of which is attached to the MUNICIPALI:TY''s ropy of this Agreement, and a copy of which is atta—ch(ad to the DEV LOPER's copy of this Agreement. During the tearm of thin Agreement, DEVELOPER shall cause the attached Letter of Credlt to be renewed at least thirty (30) days before the maturity date thereof . Failure of DEVELOPER to deliver evidence of such .r,en,ewal. to MUNICIPALITY t1lirty (30) days prior to the date of expiration of. told Letter of Credit shall constitute a detau.lt: of the terms of this ,Agreement. 5. Said Irrevocable Letter of Credit provides that the drafts drawn under said credit, Must be accompanied by a written statement signed by ,a duly auM norized agent: of the MUNICIPALITY, that in the judgement of the MUPTIC TPA.LITk s the DEVELOPER is in default under the terms of this Agreement, and that the funds to be drawn by the draft. are ,in payment: for, or in anticipation of payment for mater la? s, labor and services required for completion of the improvements Ide nti.fled in Paragraph 1. Payment of each draft will be made at :.3 fight: when presented to the BANK by the MGrARICIPALITY, the patent limited only :a� the aggregate amounts presented in relat"Allonship to the maXimum arrcunt of the Letter of C,redir.. it DEVELOPER shali be In default of the Agreement for seven (7) days because: of Its faillAro to provide evidence of renewal of the Letter of Credit, required in paragraph 4 above, the MUNICIPALITY shall notify DEVELOPER by certified wall of said default. DEVELOPER. shall then within three (3) business days provide MUNICIPALITY with evirle, -ce- of said renewal. of Letter of credit or MUNICIPALITY may notify BANK of such default and request payment under said Lette:�- of Credit, . T e DEVELOPER and MUNICTP. ALITY hereby agree that the sum shall be sufficient to zecaa.re DEVELOPER' s obligations under. this Agreement but shal ? nod:., relieve DEVELOPER from the obligation to pay ,any additional casts, if aCtUdl Costs exceed the. above -stated cost. 7. The V'UNI.CIPALITY will promptly submit to the ]DEVELOPER a copy of any drai::t it subfaiits to the BANK. The consent of the DEVELOPER to payment of said draft: by BANK to the MUNICIPALITY 2 r.-r.. .-r.-- I I 1 r rn.-.�. 11..1 1 -..Cara iC —7- -._r_. ":,I.J- TI l,.I r', I = —7' 8. The YRMICIPALITY shall not file with the BASK a Statement of Default until. ten, (10) days after notice has been sent to the DEVELOPER, by certified mail, setting forth its intention to dO sQ . 9. All. funds drawn can the BANX by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant to the Letter of Credit shall be used solely by the MUNICIPALITY for. the purpose of completing construction of t;hl- improveiPents identified in Paragraph 1. Any work contracted foz, by the MUNICIPALITY pursuant )hereto shall be lat an a con .xactutal basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall he performed by the MT,T 1C1P1A1,T. Y1,s own work forge and equipment, or shall be accomplished irk aijch other- manner as In the Judgement of the MUN.jCjpALj,Ty shall accomp.lJ sh the work more expedi.tiOusly rind economically, 10, If payments are drawn on the BPNX by the MuNICIP&LITY ptatstxant to sa-jjd Letter of Credit, and it shall later develop that a portion of the morales drawn are in excess of the MUNICIPALITY'S needs, any such excess amount shell be refunded by the MUNICIPALITY to the BANX, to be credited by said HANK to the DEVELOPER. 11. Thi:� ,Agreamen.t and said Letter- of Credit shall terminate and shall be of no force and effeQt upon completion of the one year wa,ra an-ty pe-x iod as described in the above Paragraph 3. 1 f_ the M1 ,11CIPALITY has not delivered any writt on notice to the DEVELOPER of any defective or inproper_ work or materials In the construction of the improvements within the twelve (12) month period, or if not -,ice hav been giver► and the defective work or materials have been corrected by the DEVELOPER, the M ICIPALIT'Y shall forthwith natify the BANK in writing that: the Netter of Credit may be canceled, and shall, return the original Latter of Credit to the BANK, and both the DEiiELOPER and the BANK shall be released from all obligations hereunder and under said setter of Credit, 12. upon request; of DEVELOPER, but only at the sole d.is,-'ret:i.on of the MUNICIPALITY, the HMICIPALITY may agree to redt.ic,e the amount: of said Letter of Credit required hereunder if the MUNICIPALITY believes that the full amount of said Letter- Of Crg_hdtt is no longer necessary to protect its interest, and shall notify the BANK in writing of such reduction in the amount of the Letter of Credit. 1.3. The BANY� may not modify the Letter of Credit without first receiving written consent of -the MUNICIPALITY. 14. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to indemnify and hold BANK hrannleos from all claims, causes of action or livability of any kind arising out of this A+greemen.t or the issuance by BANK of this Getter of Credit, i nQluding attorney's fees, as 3.0n,9 a.s BANK follows the terns and conditions outlined in said Letter of Credit. 3 15. This 3Agi *ent shall be binding on � parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns Dated at S J .1.� My, r��, , Vermont, this day of TIC THE PRESENCS OF: ��kelj P oaiz�- By Authorized (DEVELOPER) DdtE3d at CJ2Ue1i Vermont, this day of �.•.�...�..., - Dad at I9 9Z INPRE ENCE OF: /) 1AI�W`YYYI M�� y�_ �ll t Duly tha ed Agent 9 (13PXX ) Verrn►ont, this day of •� 2 "� By:• 4 Duly tho.rize Agent (, iCIVALITY) M3 Vermont National Bank City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Commissioner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: JWT Realty, Inc. Dear Sir/Madam: June 30, 1997 Irrevocable Letter of Credit #97-1965 We hereby establish in your favor an Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the account of JWJ Realty, Inc. up to an aggregate amount of Five Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($5,400.00), effective immediately. We hereby authorize you to draw on Vermont National Bank, 150 Bank Street, Burlington, Vermont as required under the terms of an agreement between The City of South Burlington and JWJ Realty, Inc. This Letter of Credit will expire on June 30, 1999. Payment under this Letter of Credit will be made to you upon presentation of the following documents: 1. Sight Draft drawn on the Vermont National Bank for the amount of payment claimed, bearing the clause "Drawn under Vermont National Bank Letter of Credit #97-1965". 2. Document supporting evidence that JWJ Realty, Inc. has failed to perform or is in default thereunder with a Letter of Credit Agreement between the City of South Burlington and JWJ Realty, Inc. Any such notice must be by affidavit signed by the Town Attorney or the Attorney's designee. The drafts presented for payment under this Letter of Credit must be accompanied by a letter from an authorized agent of the City of South Burlington (Municipality) stating that the Municipality has given JWJ Realty, Inc. (Developer) written notice of default of its performance requirements under an agreement between the Municipality and Developer and that said notice was deliver to Developer at least 30 days in advance of the draft(s). Unless otherwise expressly stated, this Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs & Practices for Commercial Documentary credits fixed by the International Chamber of Commerce (1993 Revision), ICC Publication No. 500 and is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code of Vermont, as from time to time amended. We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers and bona fide holders of drafts, in compliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit that such drafts will be honored upon due presentation at Vermont National Bank. Sincerely, Brian M. Meyer Vice President P.O. Box 1308, 150 Bank Street, Burlington, VT 05402-1308 802-863-8900 802-863-8933 fax 0 printed on recycled papa CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 30, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavil,,pie: Enclosed is a copy of the March 9, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plan be recorded in the land records within 90 days (6121199). If you have any questions, please give me a call. Joe ith, Director Plani ing dc' Zoning JW mcp I Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 25, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on March 9, 1999 (effective 3/23/99). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (6/21/99). . If you have any questions, please give me a call. Jeith, Director ing and Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 9 MARCH 1999 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 9 March 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the conference room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chair; John Dinklage, Marcel Beaudin, Dan O'Rourke Roger Farley, Gayle Barone Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; Gary Lavigne, Steve Gentile, Mary Pappas, C. & F. Floyd, Harry Davison, Richard Becker, Stuart Chase, Glenn Martin, Debbie Sporck, Ian Jewkes, Nectar Roris, Joseph Frank, Dewey Irish, Lou Bresee, Lance Llewellyn, Bill Spalding, John Larkin 1) Other Business: No issues were raised. 2) Report on recent site plan decisions issued by the Director of Planning and Zoning: a) Site plan application of Rocheleau Land Development, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 26,099 sq. ft. building for multiple uses (12,000 sq. ft. for warehouse & wholesale, 5433 sq. ft. for warehouse, and 8666 sq. ft. for light manufacturing) The amendment consists of revising the parking layout to add four spaces. APPROVED. b) Site plan application of David Flagg to amend a previously approved site plan for a 4,608 sq. ft. building for auto service and auto/marine sales, 10 Gregory Drive. The amendment consists of: 1) enlarging the dumpster storage area, 2) revising condition #7 of the 5/25/93 approval regarding the construction of a sidewalk, and 3) adding two parking spaces. APPROVED. The Chair asked if there was anyone on the Commission or in the audience who wished to comment on these actions. No comments were offered. 3) Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 sq. ft. of automobile sales and service use in two buildings, 1085, 1089, and 1095 Shelburne Rd. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 sq. ft. addition to the southern building. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 MARCH 1999 Mr. Lavigne showed where there will be three groups of white birches. The applicant will disconnect and remove the lights in- dicated by Mr. Weith. There will be no building mounted lights. No issues were raised by the Commission. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Commission approve the application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 sq ft of automobile sales and service use in two buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road._ The amendment consists of constructing a 979 sq, ft. addition to the southern building, as depicted on a plan entitled "South Bur- lington Chrysler Plymouth South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, dated 1/29/99, with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the expansion will generate 2.0 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3 Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures Any change in lighting shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning (hereinafter Director) prior to installation The flood light on the north side of the Chrysler - Plymouth Building shall be removed and the four round flood lights on the west side of the building shall also be removed. If the applicant wishes to install building mounted lights, details of these lights shall be submitted along with an updated point -by - point lighting study. Light details and lighting study shall require approval of the Director. 4 The applicant shall post a $1500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 5 The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Com- pliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the addition. 6 Any change to the final plat plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 7 The final plat plan shall be recorded in the land records within I PLANNING COMMISSION 9 MARCH 1999 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Ms. Barone seconded the motion which was then approved unanimously. 4) Public Hearing: Final Plat application of Frank Irish to subdivide a 39.96 acre parcel into three lots of 28.21 acres, 5.5 acres and 6.25 acres, 200 Allen Road: Mr. O'Rourke stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Martin said this plan is almost identical to the preliminary plan. The lot measurements are, however, more accurate. The applicant has a contract with John Larkin for the larger piece of land, and Mr. Larkin will have right of first refusal on the other two lots. Mr. Irish's home is on one of the small parcels. The other has been a fruit and vegetable stand, but according to zoning cannot remain so because it will not be a 10 lot minimum size. Dewey Irish asked if there is any way to keep the stand going, at least for this year. Mr. Burgess said he would have to apply to the Zoning Board. Mr. Dinklage asked if the extension of Harbor Ridge Rd. is important to what John Larkin has planned. Mr. Martin wasn't sure. Mr. Weith noted that the extension is on the Official City Map. Neighbors asked what exactly is going on with the property. Mr. Burgess explained that the action at this meeting is only to sub- divide the property. Mr. Llewellyn noted that there will be a meeting tomorrow night with interested neighbors regarding Mr. Larkin's proposed development plans. Mr. Dinklage asked if the applicant is aware that the city wants a road on that property. Mr. Martin said he is. Mr. Weith said the connection can still be made on the larger parcel; it doesn't have to be a straight road. Mr. Llewellyn noted that the Master Plan does not show Harbor Ridge Rd. through to Allen Rd, but the applicant does. Mr. Weith noted a rec path easement across the frontage as recommended by the Rec Path Committee. Ms. Barone moved the Planning Commission approve application of Frank Irish to subdivide a 39.96 acre parcel into three lots of 3 Chittenden County Regional Planning Cornmi �.�� 66 PEAR STRFU i P_O_ nox lob ECCLX JUNCTION. VERMOW QS�M PACSDELLL COVER SHEET 822 9 COMPA►1Y/ORG;2NT ZATI ON : ACSZ'Lr�E NG'I�$ER DIALED: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: NUMBER OF PAGES IN TRANSMITTAL, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: MESSAGE: - j h�r� is aj�'do� �sc�sf�� - ����eve�, a� /iy�Lif�o//ufi�• BY : / aS e s, •n / �� ess Llle Zf /� ��9 /I� ''T✓/� � l� /G-G.i� C..•. tr vrrr� the M.un.cipplilir i (/�i / ��-�L�L Q/`" %�g� &�trar: $urfngron I Chorlorcc Coleh�t� LtSCrt 1unopn f:sex , T JJ,r/ _ Ninesbur, Huntington Jer7tho o t St• C'6Q'9� Shtiburnr �+ !tort k CM and So. Burfngion UndCrhifl Wnf(ord vrfl;�,o., W..,00sCF / �.� G( (. fit /7 1 ' +` o/ 7/i rU / HCs-H r i 1/c• REFERENCES 605 Low -voltage tungsten -halogen sources are excellent site, the en rant. to the Center, the par6ing area and for water features. Water can be very effectively lighted the store (all vehicular circulation) to Porting the store from above or below. For more information on lighting eatrancr, departtncnts and finally the merchandise (all water features, refer to the Exterior Lighting section in eacra cc, 'Partcirculaticinl chanter 19, Residential Lighting. Decorative Elements Decorative luminaires. Slwch as sconces, pendants and rorchicres, can be used to add scale, color and sparkle - Placement of these elements crust be evaluated to prevent interference with sight lines of storefronts and signage. Exposed sources, such as neon and incandes- cent strplight or holiday -type ",v nlde" lights, c 3ri also add color and sparkic- Maintenance Ono of ciao m03e impo�toj.l wij�Zjjj:j �LlUnS to Mall luting design is rraintenanc:e. Equipment selection and placement must ensure accessibility using available lifts or ladders, Floor structures must also be strong enough to handle the load of this equipment. Ad- justablc luminaires should be locked in place to ensure t-Sat aiming angles will remain fixed during regular maintenance. Ions life sources, such as rapid -start fluorescent or HID lamps, typically rated at 10,000-•24,000 h, should be used to provide ambient ilfutninarion. Lamp types should be kept at a minimum so that a large inventory Ls not needed and to facilitate case of maintenance. Group schedules should be established and followed to maintain proper i luminance and source color consis- tency. On an annual basis, -group relarrrping is more economical. EXTERIOR SPACES Store and Wall Exteriors The roles of outdoor fighting at stores and shopping C1"-Ridn are numerous and varied. The lighting should attract customers to the center and then to specific Votes ; identify key areas such as entrances, tuts, park- ing and the various stores; Facilitate safe passage of inuturists and pedestrians on the grounds; conu;riute to effective security and s>_rveillanc>o of people and Property: and visually unify the shopping area, provid- ing a positive contribution to the surrounding areas without causing light trespass problems. See chapter 24, Roadway LinktL-g, for Park facilities, When the potential customer arrives in the vicinity of tilt yhop- Ping cer--ter (or ftec-standing store), there is a pattern Of prc,_.-;_ssion to arrive at the point of purchase. Lieht- ing AJay, a major role in leading the shopper from one Zone to another and eases the identification process ihrnugh each step from locating the shopping center Exterior Retail Selling Areas Exterior retail lighting includes the illumination of auto dealerships, gas station convenience stores, fast food fac0itir-s, and pool and garden canters. The goals of outdoor reiai? lighting are sirailar to those of retail incr cars bu' in addition the designer should consider such issues as bgh. pollution, light tre-~'pa iuss and giare- Lunaire scic aicn :end position arc critical factors. Light polludon and trespass can be minimized by using cut-off luminaires, optically controlled luminaires, and louvers and shields on tloodliehts. The ftnneitiaht or area-liett angle of rna_rirnum candela (candlepower) should be aimei' within the property line to minimize Zlare in surrounding areas, cspecially roadways. Lturu_ nairc selection should aLso take into consideration the specific envirc.nrncrntai requirements of the site, in par- ticular, tc;mperature, wind and corrosive factors. To select the appropriate illuminance for outdoor merchandise and dsplav areas (see recommended i1lu- minance levels for outdoor merchandising areas, chap- ter 22), the designer should consider the Iuminance ratios between the tnercl andise and rye surrounding area Wt t: sux-Ounding area refers to a specific loc:ationL For instance, a rural road will have a very low Iumi- nance. The illuminance in these areas should not be greater thaq 10 times the surrounding area.. Measure- meuts should be tzfercnced from the roadway. REFERENCES 1. tES. Vtercba.:>dising Lighting Committce. 1985. Lighnng merchandis-rn ar=s. A store lighting guide. rES RP.2-86. New Yori;: IDurr.inati.ng Engineering Society of Nonh Z=rie2- 2. L.aGui�-- F. F. '.981. A new generation of low voltage I opting- Yi ..�fezh trope Des. 114(3):40-4 4- I American S :CiBry Of 14eating, Refri;emEon and Air-Coa- ditionrrg Engineers and 111uminaLing Engineering Society Of Nor-Lh Ares; x 1985. Fnerg,T corurzanon in Erwn- brritdirg;:/IFS 100.3. Ar- t' nth Society of Heating, Refrigcr dng and air Cordiii�air.P Engineers. 4. irncri ^. Svc e:Y of 1? , in„ Ref;-i.-crating and Air-Con- dithori„; En;inecin ar;d illuminating F-a neering Society Of North Arnewica_ 19S9. E,7e Z y JJ`cienr Sign of nc'l✓ &a�rr-gs err_ent rEtit L: -rise resrd.rctial bui�. ,7 rt SHt?.gE IFS 90.1 I9s9 :kda.nta. GA: American Sociery of Hcat. big, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Epginccts- >- FelEnian, S. 1986 A dcsizricr'c checkEsr for merchandise lighting. Liam_ Drs..4ppL 16(5):1.S-21. Exterior Lighting INTRODUCTION Lighting for exterior environments involves a mu!tirude of issues. This section will help guide the lighting designer through the LziEcal issues and then address specific areas of exterior lighting design: sm:crures, softscapes, hardscapes and specialty lighting. Community -Responsive Design Community -responsive design addresses how well an enerior lighting design will be accepted by neighbors and the community. Project locations challenging to the designer may include an open parking structure located in a residential neighborhood, building lighting in a historic district, and a car dealership in a rural community. These and marry more difficult project locations can be successfully designed by following some basic design steps. The first step in desigaiag exterior lighting is to examine the com=miry t'retne. Community themes in architecture and lighting help establish local identities_ Examples of community themes are "casino and epter- tainment eccirement" and "gaslight quietness and inti- macv_" All exterior lighting designs should blend into the community theme where the project is located. The second step is to discover any community light- ing or,, b,=ces which may affect the lighting design. Lighting ordinances have many scopes and purposes_ Examples are lighting ordinances addressing light pol- lution, light trespass or minimum illuminance levels and uniformities for parking lots. Some ordinances even address community theme. The third step is to identify the immediare surround- vzg brightness. Surrounds can be classified as dark medium and bright. Examples of a dark surround are a rural town, a national park and a residential neighbor - head. An example of a mediuxa surround is an urban serti.ag in a medium -size community, or in a community where lighting ordinances dictate energy-respot cave tics gns. Examples of bright surrounds care tide down- town of a large metropolitan area and the middle of a large indtstrial park area. Identification of Pte.',g boring areas is also a c_ruc:a! stvp. Identify the iunninance of adjacear roadways_ 22 walkways and prup:r i�t. Once these have been identi- fled, the luminan:e ratio., of the design should take into cocsidecar-ion the eE;:ects listed in Fig. 22-1. Attc llt on must bt given to the safety of motorists. If a 1:10 ratio is ex:eeded, the motorist may be dis- tracted and have �t J fftcult rime identi yin- objects on the roadway. In the rye way, a home that is flood- lighted ro 10 *;ants thelevel of adjacent homes may be a disuac*ton and a source of complaint - The fourth step s to check whether the project location is in close proximity to an airport Plight patterns rrav uicrar pole height rc_ytricdons. Care should be taken to min Tnt.c uptight Iight pollution which coulu carlsc gEarc to the pilots. Light Pollution and Light Trespass As a result of efforts to increase the use of facilities during the night; Eight pollution and light trespass have become extremtiy itriportait issues that should be con- sidered when prr_pinhia an outdoor lighting design. Light p vlluaon, sometimes called atmospheric or astronomical tight pollution, is caused by stray or re- flected ii 1ac brat cmat-d irato the atmosphere. Dust, water vapor and other atmospheric pollutants reflect and scatter this 1g4t, causing the sk-y glow found over all urban areas_ nithough this sky glow is not injurious to the populace, it does deprive urban residents of the oppom=ry to stargaze. Light pollution is of special concern in arras where astronomical obserratones are located. The use of a monochromatic iigcat source such as low-pressure sodium (LPS) is preferred by astronomer., b=use it can be easily dIrtred, but the use of spectral composi- tion does not completely eliminate atmosphere light pollution. Several methods ro !Yelp control light pollution are: 1. Stre .t and area iigl tirg systems, including li-ht;a for spo. s and coru-ner6al areas such as vrhicle sales lots, should be designee 'Lo *Hints; Uc or eliminate direct up- ward 111t_t c��."s..si, o. This ;v-M not eliminate a-Ll light emi✓.siun abo.e the horizonral plane, since 711 712 --- — - - ----- EXTERIOR LIGH-rING Fig. 22-1. Recommended Luminance Rados for Exterior Lighting Effects ug►tting Effect MA41MOM wmnarc* F?=a Blending in with surrcunds 1.2 Softly accented I : 3 Accented 1 1 5 Strongly accented t 10 reflected light from the ground or pavement is an important portion of rhr upward emission. Z Lighting system that project light upward, such as architc=-al and sign lighrin , should be de -signed to minimize light that does not illuminate the target area. 3..�ll outdoor lighting, including advertising sign lighting and interior high rise office building lighting, should be turned off after use or by 11:00 p.m. unless needed for safety and secu- rity. UsuaLy safety and security illuminance, with the exception of street lighting can be at a much lower level than that needed when the area is in use. Light trespass is a somewhat subjective topic, since it relates in many cases to an unmeasurable or even undefinable quantity, which someti.rnes cannot be con- trolled. A typical example is rite `light shining in my window" complaint- To eliminate the complaint might require the elimination of a Iuminaire deemed essen- tial for the safety and security of a street or off-street area. The elimination of the offending unit rni ght sat- isfy the original complainant but result in a new com- plaint from w adjacent property resident about the darkness without the unit in place. light trespass usually can be classified into one of three categories: • The classic "light shining in a window" • Unwanted light on an adjacent property • Excessive brightness in the normal field of vi- sion (nuisance glare) Efforts have been made in numerous jurisdictions to write ordinances or laws controlling Light trespass, with little success, since enforcement is difficult An ordi- nance defining trespass in terms of horizontal Murni- nance misses the point entirely, since vertical Ium.i- nance often creates the problem. A bright object agalnst a dark background may be an annoyance, even though there is no horizon=! illumi-nance at the viewing loca- tion. The following recommendations will help control 11ght trespass problems: L Inspecting areas adjacent to the desk loca- tion to identify and consider any sensitive ioCt- dons in the lighting system dezzgn, such as residcnces, roadways and airports, Szlectir� luminaires which have tightly con- trollcd '--,trtt]ela distributions, ;Ming sharp--utoff reflectors or refractors. '. C-Ontaininr the light within the design area by careful selection, location and mounting of the luminaires- 4. Srleci: ng ::quipment which can be shielded, if a potential problem exists, after installation_ Ker_pLe `oodtijiht aiming 21291ts as low as passible during moth desi�m and installation. Energy -Responsive Design Eger-resFonsbve design involves several issues, which turn, out to be related to mitigating light trespass and p01I12tiOn and to cotuint_nI[y-responsive design - The first issue is lamp and ballast selection. Artea- tion should be ,given to selecting high -efficacy lamps and efficient balia;ts. Bearn spreads should be carefully selected for the app!iration to ensure that light is directed only where it is needed. The sound, issue is Ium.inaire selection- As with the l:txr.P, the lunli. a re should be correctly specified for the design applicacion_ The combination of lamp and !"minaire shn ld L,avc the correct distribution for the aDphcatlon M greyer to ftuTher reduce energy consump- tion by plac-Lig the light only where it is needed. The thirdl isms is the relative brightness used in the design. If careful consideration is given to figure ZZ-1, zrTerior luting desigr:s will not be too bright for their surroundings,. The focrth issue is lighting control_ Illuminance level` shot_Id be rcduccd when the property is rot occupied or wh�:rt few people are present. All :±unessential ertzrior lighting should be turned off dur- ing the late nigh, hours in order to conserve energy and to acco=rio-date local observatories. Maintenance EaTerior li;htir. maintenance issues include acutssibii- itv, 12mp and aallast !ife, e.cposu_rr_ to adverse weather conditions, dirt, a:O irmal deposits, bird nests, vandalism and water collection. Refer to chapter 3. Lighting Maintenance. Specific- Exterior Lighting Applications OC114 r ChaptP,.; ir- Cnis Handbook, such as chapters 20 on Industrial Lig.htlna. 24 on Roadway lighting, 18 an Li€.hilr,g Ccr N-lerr andise Areas, and 25 on Aviation ? iF't•n;, a t �`evoted to specific lighting applications. Care should be talkcn in applying the principles of comnnttr :ty-responsive design Lo the lighting design for these appiicatwas. UGH'17ING DESIGN ) 771 Fig. 24-21. Typical layout of roadway rest area, (i) deceleration lanes; (2) acceleration ianes; (3) gore area; (4) automobile pe,dng; (5) Muck parking; (6) cornfbr , 'on; (7) picnic tea; (8) wast6 station; anc (9) inter'or roadway. adaptation from the illuminated rest area to the un- lighted roadway. It is recommended that luminaires be used that :onfwe the main light to the deceleration and acceler- ation lanes and restrict high -angle brightness. In the 'vent that the train roadway is continuously lighted xvond the confines of the rest area, dec olcration and icceleration Ianes should be lighted to a Ievel equal to hat of the main roadway. ntelior Roadways. Interior roadways are those be- ween the entrance or exit points and the par'drl- Lreas. -As these roadways are off the main highway, the lesigner may select another type of htminaire than that .sed on the highway. The designer should keep in wind, however, that there may be an added mamte- tance problem when several different types of Iumi- ,aires and lamps are required within one area. larking Areas. Muminatfon of both automobile and rack parking areas should be designed so that, from he vehicle, the motorist can distinguish features of the rea including pedestrians. The area should be lighted Fig- 24-22. Recommended 1111uminance Levels for Roadway Rest Areas' t)niforthhyT Pest Area Lux Focttcandles Ratio Entrance and F-,olt Amass Lanes 3 to 6 .3 to 5 6:1 to 3:1 Gores 6 .6 3:1 Interior Roadways 6 6 3:1 ?arising Areas,, 11 1.0 Activity Areas Major 11 1A 3:1 Minor 5 5 0:1 'The dluminancd value8 nlCnmmendee repredent the coneition lust prior to cleaning rnd/or group relamping as :�lauizied and planned A the design procedure. ,. Aroraga l AW,2Qe to minimum. : 6 lux 10:6 Qootcandlesl minimum, so that a motorist can reed sign age and be directed by it to various parts of the area. Careful attention should be paid to areas, such as handicap snips and sari ary disposal stations, which may require special detailing. Activity Areas. Activity areas arc those designed for pedestrian use. Major activity areas are those which include such structure;; as comfort stations and infor- mation centers, ati well as the walkways between those locations and the park -in,; area_ Minor activity areas are those which include picnic tables and dog walks, and their associated walkways and faciities. Generally, the illuminance in the major activity areas will be higher than those in the minis areas. Area floodlighting may be provided for architectural or other purposes_ Care should be taken to ensure that stray light is not directed towar<' or reflected from, the main roadway towa-rd the pazsino motorist - Maintenance. Rest areas are frequently in remote, isolated regions and require more rgid maintenance and supervision tl5an facilities which can be visited more regularly by maintenance and security personnel_ Parking Facility Ughting6 Objectives. Parlang facility lighting is vital for traffic safety, for prorcc-cion aga.insr assault, theft and vandal- ism, for convenience and comfort to the user, and, in many instances, for business attraction. Types of Facilities. For lighting purposes, parking fa- cilitics can be dassi icd as ei-her open or covered. Most parking facilities will be either one type or the other, but in a multticvel parkdng structurc, the roof level will be considered open while the lower levels will be considered covered. Open Park!rr,; FG il:,''es. i ,e ilium nation require- ments of an open parbL.-ig 'acilim depend on the amount of usage it receives. T-hr,.e 1;vets of activity have been established and air (icsi;nated as fiigh, rrwdi an and 772 low. These levels rctiect both traffic and pedestrian activity and are illustrated by, but not limited to, the following examples: High activity: • Major league athletic events • Major cultural or civic everts • Regional shopping centers • Fast food facilities Medium activity: • Community shopping centers - Office parks • Hospital parking areas • Transportation parking (airports, commuter lots, etc.) • Cultural, civic or recreational cwcnts - Residential complex parking Low activity: • Neighborhood shopping • Industrial employee parking • Educational facility parking • Church parking If the level of nighttime activity involves a large num- ber of vehicles, then the ccaraples above for Iow and medium activity properly belong in the next higher level. ROADWAY LIGFiT(NG COvere1 f r,,ing FacXdes. Four critical areas can be identified Wi;hir. covered parking facilities: general parking and pedestziari a. cas; ramps and corners; en- trance areas: and staLways. These critical areas can require lighting Sort, day and night. The first of these areas is considered to be the same ai, for an open Parking faciltty. The second area is self -explanatory - Tice third area (entrince) is defined as the entryway into the covered portion: of the parking structure from the portal to a point 15 m (50 ft) beyond the edge of covering on the Structure. The fourth area again is self-explanatory. .rllumuzance Reco,rrnend z,-ions. Recommendations have been established for both open parking facilities (outdoor) Lind covcred parking facilities (structures), as shown in figure ''4-23_ These rccommendations are given to providc for the safe movement of traffic, for satisfactory visiot: ffor pedestrians and for the guidance of both vehicles and pedestrians. They are the lowest acceptable Ievels consistent with the seeing task in- volved and the need to deter vandalism while at the same time meeting energy constraints. Customer con- venience, cieted circuit tcievision surveillance and cus- tomer atrracdon may require a higher level of lighting in some circtunstartccs. In open parking facilities, a getteral parking and pedestrtarz area is deF:nt-.d as one where pedestrian conflicts with vehicles are Likely to occur. A uehiadar use area (only) is deftned as one where conflicts with pedestrians are not likely to occur. These are areas such as service: areas or access roads. It should be noted that, whereas figure 2T23 speci- fics average levels for the vehicular area in open park - Fig. 24-23. Recommended Maintained Horizontal Illuminances for Parking Facilities (a) Open Parking Facilities General PaAing and Pedestrian Area Ven:ae Use Area (only) %atctandtes "candles Level of L41X (Mirimunt (Minimum On Uniformly Ratio Loc (,average qn (Average cn Uniformity Ratio Aaivfty on Pavement) Pavement) (Average.Minimum) Pavement) Pevemert) (Average:Minimum) High 10 0.9 4:1 22 2 31 Medium 0 O.e 4:1 i1 1 3.1 tow• 2 0.2 4:1 5 0.5 4:1 (b) Covered Parking Facilities Day f.(iCht - Lux (Average Footeanetes Lett (Average roctcrt�_tes on (Average on tAverage Uniformity Ratio Areas PsvemerOT on Pavement)T on fteement) (Avera_e laitimum) General parking and -- -- Pedestrian areas 54 5 541 5 4:1 Ramps and Comers 11C 10 54 5 4;1 Entrance areas 540 50 54 5 4:1 Stairways . Th s recommendation is based on the requirement to maintain security at arty dme it arr--3.!i a raw level of nighttime acuity. * Sum of siectric lighting and daylight See c;hapier 11, iilutTll!1ance Selection. LIGI TENG DESIGN 773 ing facilities and for covered parking facilities, it speci- fics rrunrmum levels for the pedestrian areas of open parking facilities. The reason for this is that an abso- lute minimurn of lighting is considered necessary for the identification of features or pedestrian safety, which should be achieved at all points. Special Considerations. Lighting of access roads to all types of parking facilities should match the Iota[ high- way Iighting, as much as possible. The average main- tained illuminance should be compatible with local conditions. The average-ro-mia.imum uniformity ratio should not excLed 3: I. In all Parking facilities, corisideradon should be given to color rendition, uniformity of fighting and minimizing glare. Users sometimes have trouble identi- fying their cars under light sources with poor color rendering characteristics Uniformities less than rec- ommended can detract from safety and security. Glare can affect the ability to perceive objects or obstructions clearly. In many parking facilities, closed-circuit television is deemed necessary. When the camera tube is specified, the Eshting Ievel, the type of light source, the distribu- tion pattern of luminaires and the aiming of the cam- era must be considered in order to ensure effective results. From the standpoint of energy management, it may be desirable to reduce the lighting levels in certain parking facilities during periods of reduced activity. For example, during peak use, the high -activity lighting levels may be required. During inactive periods only security lighting will be necessary. Special Considerauons for Open Facilities. In open Parking facilities, eats, entrances, Ioading zones, Pedestrian crossings and collector lanes should be given special consideration to permit ready identification and to enhance safety. Lighting for outdoor pedestrian stairways may re- quire a luminaire. on every landing with additional units in between if required for safety. It may be necessary to call attention to changes in elevation where steps are present. Parking facilities for rest or scenic areas adjacent to roadways generally employ lows- illuminances. See the subsection on Rest Areas. Support pokes shoLId be I=ted so as not to be damaged by automobiles being parked. The overhang of a typical automobile is approximately 0S-1.0 m (IS-3,3 fr) in front, and 1.5 :a (5 ft) in the rear_ Vandalism is an imp ortan: consideration with open Parking facilities. Damage car, geaerally be reduced by mounting Luminaires at lea,,! 3 m (10 fr) above grade. Howeverr g,*caer mounting L•eights are recommended. Cori,id-:radon for Cot'ered Pacdities. In cov- crc`, Parking facilities, v-rt,,=i iflurninances of objects such as colismn.z. and wylls should be equal to the borizoarai values gl-,ra in figure 24-223. These vertical values should be for a !oearion 1.8 m (6 fr) above the pavement+ In covered parking facilities the design should be arranged so that some lighting can be Ieft on for secui* reasons. The low level from figure 24-23 for open parking facilities can be used for this purpose. Emerget•.cy lumiaau , in covered parking facilities should be l0alc - so as -to provide a minimum lighting level in case of an interruption to the normal power SuPPIy. In gezer3L these units should provide approxi- mately 10% of the levels in figure 24 -23, or applicable local -ode iequirement_S. llluminatied Roadway Signs' Motorists may stop or reduce speed at roadway signs that are difdcult to read, and thus create a hazardous condition. Proper sigft lighting can aid rapid and accu- rate recognition of the sign shape, color and message. Lighting for roadway signs becomes more signiFa=t as: (1) v:)lrlrne of tlafEc increases, (2) complexity of highway de.;i n increases, (3) likelihood of adverse weather increases ar,d (4) ambient luminance in- creases. Ambient Luminance. 'Pie background luminance against which a sign will ;)e viewed by a motorist is called its (tir..biEne lurrrirerce. Three categories of ambi- ent luminance (high, me49iwn and low) can be identi- fied: = Areas with high street lighting levels and brightly lighted advertising signs Medium: Areas with M-M commercial develop- ments and UahteJ roadways and interchanges Low. Rural areas %='!hour Iighting or areas with very low levels of Iiohting High levels of ambient luminance car, make siga light- ing mandatory in ors+err :O ensure sign legibility for deCis-ve driver action. Light Source Se(ecti ; �. )Energy consumption is a ma - .,Or consideration that .,;usrbe balanced by other fac- tors, such as colcr remdermef ambient temperature and maintenance. Sclectian should be based on efficacy and lamp Life in additi::r: t.o careful evaluation of color rendering abi►stic�. Iadh^_: g must maintain the color rendering as :Icse as practical to that seen under da_vli hr condirion;. Itlurrtinatio,, reco rmer?daL ris. Vhz re are three types of lighted sib:s: e.<errc:?I. ii h:ei micas, inrcrna2y Aghred sivrs, and i::�-!in_oc:; .c< c:r:,� message si ns (where the message is fcr:ne4 by lamp.- VJb' 1.:/'y \ lb: lid _mil irdUUbIP'iMn uti I ) v V Illumination Levels The amount of light required for an automotive dealership is dependent on the location of the facility, and can be broken into three levels: • High Competitive - Automalls and dealership rows are areas which require higher levels of illumination to compete with adjacent facilities. Typically located on high visibility thoroughfares. • Medium Com titive - Dealerships located in urban areas with moderate traffic but without neighboring, competing dealerships. • Low Competitive - Facilities located in rural areas or areas with low ambient light levels in the surrounding area. Without competition, even low levels of light will create an attractive environment. 40 A 42 ., � I a2 4 ae 44 4� 4a ' 4e 4 — 44 47 40 •4 43 4 • 67 A j1 °41 41' 4a1 1� _- 3 43 ------ -_. HIGH COMPETITION 3° 34 A 34 34 .'Era: 90 40 •0' 33 33� 33� 3q 4 a 3g 3437 39 30 0 a3 42 3f 33� 3 3 ae _ 8 39 44147 30—a9 1 31 37 2B ° 47 46 30 3z 33 44 AV3, 41 AS 44 37 40 32 331 3 38 33 32 ,� 24 1 -. - 70' VP - .. MEDIUM COMPETITION :c>G: 30` 20,, 2e,' �o, as ya:: �, 38 �1 34 1 29 a7, 20ti �7t ` 4t 44� 43 3' 2e 2a 1 1 a 0 19'•. l 42 40 34 2e 27°3 4A3 1A 3 - -- 2�l 4� 36 14 1 24 3 1 � 28 2' 1 41 —Z 32 43� Al 1 4 91 Z1' Ye' eo 'Q.al 231 32 25 ,34 ', 25 1 29 00 23� 261 54'• 3a� ' WP za LOW COMPETITION 7 /&__17 .21 - SECONDARY ROW DISPLAY Assembly D Secondary now Display Assembly Spacing 60'0" Mounting Height 24'0" Initial foot-candle values at 3'0" above grade Average 44.0 Max/Min 2.00 Assembly D Secondary Row Display Assembly Spacing 70'0" Mounting Height 24'0" Initial toot -candle values at 3'0" above grade Average 36.9 Max/Min 1.96 Assembly D Secondary Row Display Assembly Spacing 80'0" Mounting Height 24V' Initial foot-candle values at 3'0" above grade Average 31.8 Max/Min 2.33 Uu_ t nnT" C�� O U3 VERTICAL BURN LUMINAIRES FIRST ROW DISPLAY Assembly A Front Row Display Assembly Spacing 40'0" Mounting Haight 24'0" Initial foot-candle values at 3'0" above grade Average 83.9 Max/Min 3.18 Assembly A Front Row Display Assembly Spacing Solo" Mounting Height 24'0" Initial foot-candle values at 3'0" above grade Average 68.9 Max/Min 3.47 Assembly C Front Row Display Assembly Spacing 50'0" Mounting Height 24'0" Initial foot-candle values at 37 above grade Average 37,2 Max/Min 3.13 Characterized by its circular design and distinctive styling, any dealership is sure to be noticed with this unique fixture. A variety of light r` sources are available including a Xertical burn Super Metal Halide for outstanding energy efficient performance. The l-tilton's vertical burn lamp and reflector design makes It possible to use Twin instead of Triple assemblies on the secondary row, which can significantly reduce the total amount of fixtures required. la 60 1 6A 74 fly 78'1 2 Il, t 7 71 0 7 72 s.cos° , 0 t00 te 063 Y�ftt43 t06 0 00 3t6 ^t�e0a6 1o170 874 1Ot�tt NIGH COMPETITION 34 64 56 49 1,17 a 4O66134 46 6A91,3 3a p7 93 7711 B2 47' 67 61 t 34 t10 fl2 t t14�:7j 36 50 TO 20• MEDIUM COMPETITION 92t 33 31' tee- 33 � 28 i 561, 29' t w 31{ 36 30 j 32 z2t a� zbl 32 1 �s ♦a �. 4 1 3a 33 � i �• � 67 k2_ Z 24 421 3t�', a 9 30 5 r 6 -may t OOi� a0L BR ` so. iy0 _ 20 -• LOW COMPETITION 6 T HILTONTM SERIES H I LTO N CAROLINA FAMILY The Hilton, from LSI's Carolina family of outdoor fixtures, accentuates the high -profile designs of today's upscale commercial centers with soft, rounded curves. You'll achieve the sophisticated extension of rounded architectural details throughout grounds and parking areas by creating a complete aesthetic statement. Specify the Hilton Series for a high-performance outdoor lighting. SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING REFLECTORS/DISTRIBUTION DECAL STRIPING The Hilton's one-piece spun PATTERNS To complement the fixture's aluminum housing is available in three sizes: small, medium and Hilton fixtures are available in five reflector systems and distribution appearance, a color -coordinated decal is available in 10 standard large. All pole -top fixtures are patterns: Type II (2), Type III (3), decal colors or by custom order pre -wired. Each fixture is UL listed Perimeter Forward Throw (FP), from a selection of hundreds. Decal and CSA certified for wet locations. Automotive Forward Throw (FA) is guaranteed for five years against LENS/GASKET 1000 Watt only, or Type V Square peeling, cracking or fading. Hilton's contoured tempered glass (5). Small fixture housings in Type III and FP feature a horizontal BALLAST lens or contoured polycarbonate lens, (CP — available on small and medium burn reflector. All other lamp types High -power factor type ballast fixtures only) measuring 3cas in feature a ve Nall bu reflector. is designed for 20°F operation. Reflectors are fi d-rotatable on �, The tow wattage High Pressure thickness, is sealed to the cast aluminum lens frame with continuous medium and large fixtures, enabling flexibility 1Sodium ballast (50, 70, 100, watt) features HX-HPF or EPDM extruded gasketing. generous in distribution patterns without fixture movement. 1150 R-HPF circuitry. Metal Halide DOOR FASTENERS All photometric data is certified by (100 Watt) also features HX-HPF The Hilton features four stainless an independent testing facility. circuitry. All other wattages steel captive door fasteners which feature CWA type circuitry. The provide secure closure and allow easy access with no loose FINISHE Each Hilton fixture is finished with removable ballast tray features a quick -disconnect plug. hardware. For easy installation, DuraGrip®, LSI Lighting Systems revolutionary superior baked -on p BRACKETS Hilton lens frame is field -removable. polyester -powder finishing Arm Mount: 6" extruded SOCKETS process, to give the fixture an aluminum bracket designed Porcelain medium or mogul -base exceptionally attractive appear- to match luminaire housing is sockets feature spring -reinforced once. Standard finish colors standard with all configurations. contacts for long life. available for the Hilton are bronze, d h anousin Bracketg attach to LIGHT SOURCES cocoa, vanilla, black, platinum, white and green. Architectural round pole with through -bolts and one-piece, back-up pole nut The Hilton utilizes any of the finishes include brick, gray granite, plate (included with fixture). following lamp types: High Pressure red granite, limestone, desertstone Pole Top: The cast aluminum Sodium, Super Metal Halide or Metal and green marble. The DuraGrip mounting hub conceals wiring Halide with medium or mogul -base polyester finish withstands compartment and mounting sockets. All lamp types feature a extreme weather changes without hardware (consisting of four vertical burn reflector (except small cracking or peeling. Finish is 11/16° O.D. aluminum rods and fixture housings in Type III and guaranteed for five full years. a high -strength grade -five steel Perimeter Forward Throw, which bolt with nylon insert and split feature a horizontal burn reflector). lock washer for double locking). PHOTOMETRICS Other mounting types are available. See Optional Bracket 1000W Super Metal Halide Ordering Information. Type V Square Distribution 3MH 2MH IMH_p4MH or •�p,3MH 2MH NMI 1MH `, MTG. HT. A B C D E 4.50 2.25 1.13 .45 3.72 1.86 .93 .37 3.13 1.56 .78 .31 R36 2.66 1.33 .67 .27 2.36 1. 55 .57 .23 2.00 1.00 .50 .20 1 47, 731 37 .15 4MH Levels snown are in footcanoles. POLES Refer to Poles/Brackets section of catalog for pole ordering information. U` listed for wet locations. S I CSA certified Front 1:3 11906119 19161K. LSI LIGHTING SYSTEMS, A Division of LSI 10000 ALLIANCE ROAD - P.O. BOX 42728 - C NCINNATI, OHIO 4 242 0728 - ( 13)1793.3200 - FAX (513) 793-0147 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning Re: February 9, 1999 agenda items Date: February 5, 1999 3) DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING'S REPORT Enclosed are the Findings of Fact and Decisions for the following site plan applications: a) Site plan application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a previously approved plan for a 25,200 square foot mixed -use building consisting of 13,700 square feet for educational facility use and 11,500 square feet for research and testing laboratory use, 75 Green Montanan Drive. The amendment consist of revising the parking layout. APPROVED b) Application of Green Tree Park Associates to amend a previously approved plan for a 17,400 square foot building for warehouse use for a multiple number of tenants. The amendment consists of. 1) converting 5600 square feet of warehouse use to research and testing laboratories, and 2) converting 5844 square feet of warehouse use to printing, bookbinding, publishing and engraving use. APPROVED 4) WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - ADDITION- SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved plan for a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 square foot addition to one (1) of the buildings. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 9/23/97 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road lies within the C 1 District. It is bounded on the west by Fayette Road, on the south by L&M Park, on the east by Shelburne Road, and on the north by Hannaford Plaza and a cemetery. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 38 foot signalized driveway on Shelburne Road. No changes proposed. Memorandum - Planning February 9, 1998 agenda items February 5, 1999 Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks:; Entire PUD: Building coverage is 11.4% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parkin: A total of 63 spaces are required for customers and employees. A total of 63 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces and one (1) bike rack. A bike rack should be provided for the other building. Landscaping: The final plat plan should include additional landscaping in an amount to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate 174 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the current facility to generate 77.9 vte's and with the proposed addition to generate 79.9 vte's which is a 2.0 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be $0. Lighting: Details for any additional exterior lighting should be submitted with the final plat submittal. The flood light on the north side of the Chrysler -Plymouth building should be removed and the two (2) round lights on the west side of the building should be tipped straight down. 5) JAM GOLF LLC & HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved planned residential development consisting of 244 residential units and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of 1) resubdividing eight (8) lots (lots #80-87) on Golf Course Road by shifting seven (7) of them 60 feet to the south, and 2) resubdividing four (4) lots (lots #71-74) on Holbrook Road. The reason for shifting the lots is to provide access to lands to the north for possible future development. The reason for resubdividing the four (4 ) lots is to remove a portion of the golf course mistakenly constructed within the lot boundaries. 2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February, 26, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is a copy of the February 9, 1999 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. jSinc rely, t Joe eith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl u ,y , rmr eu. �& spayed. 21Fe Moving & can't r: with met I'm .round 4/1, Pos- lort term adop- o date on shots. l563 ING TABLE maple finish, dition. 3691. =OUCN Maid. opens to bed, needs VIC TABLE -res, OLD COT, K CAN. OLD )WER, & more. leave mes- ny name is Ben. -late, Lab & Re- x. 1 yr. old. My as gone to Flor- am all alone. ve me a good as. Call 802. DOC oration. Needs n to roam, and with kids. Free. Sr. 865-4559. ayed 4 yr old Cattle dog. but affection- sds compan- 'amily, working quiet country oving out of 482-4043. ASS TUB A XTURE 'anity top & 8x- h very ood Free. tome at: 32 Maryland ,rlington. there a loving me9 12 wk. old hair Buff/White -t. I need an in- ie full of love, d a lap to curl 'n cold winter 3) 585-7271. TTEN rd tiger female, has all shots. 2427. it .BBIT >y rabbit, box `nendly. Call 284. _E GRAY 10 Ad. Call 372- ,i i PEIS tut of busi- ause of III- aars old. No -99-3877 for ant. "E1gD MIX d. Great with to- a gyood Call 658-5702 OVER - MTD ,r could bete - pick up. •40. AILER 'me & garage. ;5-3433. TENS )le 8 week old' s ready to go ` homes, first serve, call' 63-4746 leave not home. LOST CAT orange with white chest, four white paws, 7 Ibs, surgery on right eyye. 'Fletcher', last seen 215 on West St Winooski. Call 655-2921 LOST GOLD WEDDINO BAND, At Burlington Wintertec Sun.. Feb. 14th. Call 865 3796. REWARD! J t'r tr tr tr LOST WALLET Sat. 2/6 Shelburne Rd Price Chopper. Impor. tant. Please return tc Price Chopper Customer Service.. We found our orange eat. Thanks to every- one who called. Please support the Humane Society. PERSONALS 6 ADOPT A loving, warm, secure couple looking to share our life with a newborn. We promise much love and financial security.' Expenses paid. Please call Bob and Randi Elleh toll free at 888-345-7166. ADOPT A baby, a dream. Warm loving F/T Mom, professional Dad long for baby. House full of laughter. Love & support of extended family. Ex- penses paid. Please call Cathy & Rob 877-204- 9051. s .- ADOPTION A beautiful life awaits precious newborn in our lakeside New England home. Young, secure couple will provide rich environment to create cherished childhood memories of uncondi- tional love. Expenses paid. Call Jodi collect 1-603-228-1614 Mon.- ri., 8:30 am-5:30 pm EST or call Robin & Ray @ 1-888-763-6338 eves./ wkends. ADOPTION is a hard but loving decision. Please consider us to adopt your baby. Expenses paid. Please call Carole/Artie 1-800-249-6130 'ARIBBEAN VACA- TIONS 2 vacation pack- ages to Caribbean desti- nations. 5 days, 4 nights. $650. All inclusive, 3 days, 2 nights. $600. Air- fare not included. No ex- piration date. Call 658- 7609, leave message. CELTICS TICKETS Orlando Feb. 24. New Jersey March 1. Denver March 5. Clippers March 17. Most games avail. Call 802-888-5330. Hey Honey, night #1, neet me at 1427 Willis - on Rd.. So. Burlington. i58-4733. ASCAR RACES- ALL 'ocono, NH NCAA & %CC Tournament, 1-800- i284257 Stage Front TICKETS througgh Friday 8:30 a.m to 4:30 p.m. Dated at We Vermont this Jday of February 1999, Arthur Menut, Chair William Leach Jon Anderson Westford Select Board February 20, 1999 The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday. March 9, 1999, at 7:30 P.M to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of FAR WATER LTD to amend an approved 85 unit planned residential development in four (4) buildings, and subdivi- sion of a 12.67 acre par- cel into three (3arcels of 7) p .01 acres, 0. acres, and 5.33 acres, 1952 and 1953 Airport Parkway. The amendment consists of 1) revising building lo- cations, 2) resubdividin 12.66 acres into three (� parcels of 7.05 acres, 5.33 acres and 0.28 acres, and 3) add two ((2) units for a total of 8� units. 2) Final plat application of Frank Irish to subdi- vide a 39.96 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 28.21 acres, 5.5 acres, and 6.25 acres, 200 Allen Road. 3) Final plat application of Wismann-Lamphere Architects to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of 30,- 310 square feet of auto- mobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085. 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 square foot addition to the southern building. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission February 20, 1999 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room. 575 Dor- set Street, South Burling- . -ton, Vermont on Monday, March 8, 1999 at 7.00 P.M. to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Todd and Maureen Wulfson seek- ing a variance from Sec- tion 25.00 Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a residential dwell- ing (foolapproxi- mately 28 x76') to within four (4) feet of the ~ , erty side yard,'localod lot #31, Pinnacle Drive, •yu• •ca, wu u,e Road Commissioner at 8993180. Town Highways - Class 1, 2, 3 & 4 2-Axle Trucks 15,000 Ibs 3-Axle Trucks 18.000 Ibs Tractor-Trlr. 20,000 Ibs February 20, 1999 fmp/ovi rent EMPLOYMENT 2 MEDIrter CAL CEN71L INC. I Nursing ! I Opportunities! LNA/MED SURG Part time.. Days. FIN/OB NURSE Part time & per diem. Roatating shifts. Respon- sibilities involve all as, pacts of the OB unit. Ex- perience a plus. . RN/ED Per diem. ACLS, critical care and ED experience required. RNCC and/or ENPC desirable. Our benefit plan includ- ing health & dental insur- ance is available to part & full time employees. If interested, please call (802)388-4780 or visit our Human Resource Dept., at 115 Porter Drive, Mid- dlebury, VT 05753 or Fax (802) 388-8899. TO RESPOND TO A FREE PRESS BOX NUMBER Send to: Burlington Free Press P.O. Box 10 Burlington, VT 05402 Atf. Free Press Box - ACCOUNTs PAYABLE CLERK National Manufacturer 9f Building Products has an opening in our U.S.' headquarters in Williston, VT. Accounting knowledge and previous experience an asset. We offer a competitive salary, along with medical, dental, and 4Q 1 k. Resume to: Kaycen Ltd., 11 Boyer Circle, Williston, VT 05495 or fax to 802-865-0268. ULL'BLE ITEMS' WITH A CL SSM AD. CALL 6SS-=i. ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/OFFICE MANAGER for non-profit organiza- tion. Budget and office management, computer and desktop publishing skills. 18 hours/week, excellent salary. Resume to NASW/VT, PO Box 1348, Montpelier, VT and able t. ple/simultar : Great oc Please. fax Suzanne Br (781) 7 ARCHt DRAFT: needed witr drawing ez professionE firm with practice. Gr- nities, exce` environment dental insu Call Morris/: Associates, £ ATTOF, BERGERC & FITZPAI. seeks a ger associate fc ton office, should have yrs exper. it business ar, matters, anc litigation. Pie resume to Paradis & LLP, Attn: Paradis, PC Essex Jct., V AUTO ME. one year preferred or Must have Apply In pers Discount N. Dr, Essex i AUTOk. Reconditio seeks an e!, son with a cerise. Mue' old Apply on Monday . to: GOSS L IN(. 1485 Shel, SO BURL EC GET EVEi ATTER USE ORr Automotive A.S.E. M TECHNI MIDI AUTO SY, $19430 per he Plus, plus, p: -Black 802-864 AUTOMc DEALEi SECRETAR'r include but nc data entry, f. estimates, ar, floe work. F assist body , ,ager In all asr department. able to work environment. pang benefit: medical, dens etc. Apply after 9AM a, shop. GOSS Q 1485 Shelb SO BURLI' EOi #2 Appeal of Al<,n Pidgeon & Fie,, Bn Tech. TO:nanure nwru- ;neaus tasks.• r. -• ,y .W. Bonus paid for Ford cer- rtunity. u star, at' tification. Benefits & ex -to: cellent compensation. Reply with resume to Egglefield Ford, Maple w, 127, tTErt:TS/ St., Elizabethtown, NY PERSONS 12932. thlarien ructio i r xpllrience for L,L al architecture AUTOMOTIVE international ',Aril SALES h opportu- 3Dpnt working Multiline Imported. car t.Iwalth,' dealership seeks an en- ,rance, 401 K. ergetic, enthusiatic Sales SWzer & Consultant. Flexible 89-878-8841 hours,, great working sR!$t1EY conditions, and profit 7K-. PARADIS sharing. Please send re- 1'fi1CK. LLP, sume to: Will Dodge at: riecal practice )r..its Burling - '.Candidates QD a min. of 3=5 n,mal estate, net corporate j d some civil MAZDA • SAAB • SUZUKI !ease forward 2073 Williston Rc -, Bergeron, *itzpatrick, So. Burlington 658.4483 1.800-427-4483 Vincent A. 25 years ye your VT Saab Dealer 0 Box 174, VT 05453. Automotive t£CHANIC • SERVICE ADVISOR r, experience Multi line import dealer - 'Pt will train, ship seeks people ori- ntwvn tools. e9ted service advisor. Ison, n eke Must be detail -oriented A1trw. avid and comfortable with fast Ict"VT. paced environment. V * ** �� �10 .1 4a ning Shop iergetic pe•- driver's li- A,lbe 18 years n:,person only and Tuesday DODGE J c. Iburne Rd UNGTON ,JE N MORE ITION! APHICS .MASTER ICIANS tVTEMS hWr'Itat rate this. Call Bill ,4;7703 QTIVE RSNIP iYDuties to of limited to filing. body old Other O`- Person. wiu shop man- pacts of the MAust be c rin a busy #ull com. .St including 'AMI, 401(k) ,in person at,,the body )ODG E burne Rd ING's ',)N OE Please send resume to: Paul, P.J.'s Auto Village, 2073 Williston Rd, So. Burllington, VT 05403. /�PJ's �__.A MAZDA SAAB SUZUKI �„r� VNirsVnric 658.4483 1.800.4 27.4493 25 years your VT Saab Dealer be" P 191 .it with in customer Pure of c Eq.d v INTAKE COORDINATOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT sought for busy mental h� r practice. Applicants must interpersonal skills, sen In confidentiality, ability to pnowi,-- e),, ence with a multi -line phone - _ierr familiarity with, Microsoft Word i is E Prior experience in a mental heaan-yeti: knowledge of managed care, arc :ransc tion experience preferred. Please respe- with cover letter and resume by mail te: Alesia Henry, Office Manager Otter Creek Associates �t 86 Lake Street Burlington, VT 05401 or by fax to (802) 86o-5011 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 22, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, February 26, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerel , Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: Applicants/Project Fil From: Raymond J. Belai ng & Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary comments, March 9, 1999 agenda items Date: February 22, 1999 FARWATER_ LTD - REVISE BUILDING LAYOUT -_REVISED FINAL PLAT — buildings should be numbered and the number of units in each building noted. — provide revised sewer allocation request. — a total of four (4) handicapped spaces are required for lot # 1 and only two (2) handicapped spaces are proposed. — a total of five (5) handicapped spaces are required for lot #2 and only two (2) handicapped spaces are proposed. — the note within the northerly building on lot #2 states that there are 28 parking spaces under the building yet the plan shows only 20 spaces. This should be corrected. — the survey plat states that lot #3 is 0.29 acres and sheet 1 of 12 states that it is 0.28 acres. This discrepancy should be corrected. — it is staffs position that the maximum density is 85 units. The applicant should withdraw the request for the two (2) additonal units. FRANK IRISH - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT sheet 1 of 1 (wetland location plan) should be revised to note that the 50 foot wetland buffer and 50 foot drainageway setback is the boundary of the Conservation and Open Space District. lot #2 must be at least 10 acres in size to accommodate the farm stand. plans should be revised to note that the westerly property boundary is the boundary between the C2 District to the west and the R2 District to the east. applicant should double check the names of the abutters, (e.g. # 10 Bay Crest Road is owned by Jose & Kim Negron). WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - ADDITION - REVISED FINAL PLAT — plan submitted is acceptable. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 9, 1998 Agenda Items Date: February 23, 1999 LIME ROCK VILLAGE - AIRPORT PARKWAY Site plans dated 1/29/99 prepared by Provan & Lorbtr, Inc., of Montpelier are acceptable. SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. New frontage sidewalk shall have a handicapped ramp at entrance drive. 2. Site plan dated 1/29/99 prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere Architect is acceptable. FRANK B. IRISH - ALLEN ROAD Plot plan for a three lot subdivision prepared by Vermont Land Surveyors dated 1/26/99 is acceptable. r MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: March 9, 1999 agenda items Date: February 23, 1999 1) Far Water, Ltd. Dated 2/3/99 1952 & 1953 Airport Parkway a) The turning radius into lot #2 is bad for the tower truck. b) The buildings should be sprinklered. c) The plans should include the fire hydrant locations. 2) Frank Irish Dated 2/12/99 200 Allen Road Acceptable 3) South Burlington Chrysler -Plymouth Dated 2/12/99 1095 Shelburne Road Acceptable 'ilk v Wlt�- , AGENDA South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall Conference Room 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Meeting @7:30 P.M. Tuesday, February 16, 1999 1) Other business. 2) Design Review application of H. Glaeser & Company, Inc. to install a 99.9 square foot wall sign (Healthy Living), 4 Market Street. 3) Discuss proposed amendment to the zoning regulations to allow schools as a conditional use in the Southeast Quadrant District. 4) Presentation by Dori Barton of Heindel and Noyes of the Bartlett Brook Watershed Study - 1998 Infiltration Study. 5) Discuss the adequacy of current tools and models used to evaluate and estimate traffic impacts of new development. R ectfiz(:: lly su tte , Jo eith, Director Planning & Zoning PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 9, 1999, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of FAR WATER LTD to amend an approved 85 unit planned residential development in four (4) buildings, and subdivision of a 12.67 acre parcel into three (3) parcels of 7.01 acres, 0.33 acres, and 5.33 acres, 1952 and 1953 Airport Parkway. The amendment consists of: 1) revising building locations, 2) resubdividing 12.66 acres into three (3) parcels of 7.05 acres, 5.33 acres and 0.28 acres, and 3) add two (2) units for a total of 87 units. 2) Final plat application of Frank Irish to subdivide a 39.96 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 28.21 acres, 5.5 acres, and 6.25 acres, 200 Allen Road. 3) Final plat application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects to amend a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a 979 square foot addition to the southern building. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission February 20, 1999 1) 2) 3) 4) CITY OF SOUTH,BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record JWJ Realty, 1095 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 b. Applicant Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, VT 05446 Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Purpose: planned unit development; Location: Shelburne Road, 2 lots; Proposed use: an addition to Chrysler Plymouth facility for sales and display Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. 1095 Shelburne Road - Owner Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties City of South Burlington, James Fayette, et al., and Burlington Mall, Inc. 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. see site plan 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. none 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: none 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 8J x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial r ind rial complex, multi -family project, planne it de opment, or planned residential devel en P- (Signatur pp cant or contact person ate �211 / 7 q oil,, a �t de � 3/z3 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 5, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 9, 1999 at 7.30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �oe Weith, Director Planning & Zoning JW/mcp Encls NV. 30' CONC. 195.16 U I Z 0 v � IW } Q 6' FOLWATM— DAAN NV. T 41 - EX67N0 OF PA LOT NO, 1= 3 S BUILDING COVERAGE IS -1 ALOVERALL COVERAGE IS ALL.O FRONT YARD COVERAGE IS 1 .9% (MAX. J6' 01NP / EX. at NY-79 NV�16 �37 14 EMPLOYEE PARKING 0 10 30 100 J. & D. WESSON — w w FAYETTC❑, INC. —f�— R[LOCATE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT. u oPLnYEE PAMOM T�I.1 \ J SATLIRN IF SOUTH HURL2NGTON 4 EIPLAYEE PARNm40 DISPLAY AREA REF-1 _TREE S -_ — N.6 Ra-2G3.et fXISTNG MOE OF PA%UO NT EXISTING 1000 GALLON OIL SEPWI4TOR a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGT❑N CEMETERY LOT NO, 2 = 127,566 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE IS 9% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 30%) OVERALL COVERAGE IS 74.4% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 70%) FRONT YARD COVERAGE IS 6% (MAX. ALLOWED IS 30%) SCRUB TREE'S CHAIN LINK FENCE E {ISITNG CEMETERY —12' MAPLE --3' ELM — 24' MAPLE Il SHELBURNE ROAD LN. & PAPPAS, PERRY REST, GROUP JWJ REALTY 1095 SHELBURNE RD. SOUTH BURLINGT❑N, VT Z J SITE INF❑RMATI❑N LOT SIZE, 232,329 S.F. OR 5.34 ACRES f BUILDING COVERAGEi = 26,583 S.F. o LANDSCAPED AREAL 69,930 S.F. I- TOTAL LOT COVERAGE, 162,399 S.F. Z ZONING, C❑MMERCIAL J w % BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED, 11.4% TOTAL LOT C❑VERAGEI 69,9% BLDG,PA V E, W ALKS,ETC.) FRONT YARD COVERAGE, 12% BUILDING INFORMATION 1. NO NEW EMPLOYEES. 2. BUILDING COST, $100,000. 3. TYPE OF C❑NSTRUCTI❑N, MATCH EXIST. LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE r POWER POLE o.. Ex LIGHT POLE EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH TREE rot FASTING SHRUB • SMUT -OFF VALVE — — — 35 — — — SANITARY SEVIERR LINE — — • — — — WATER LINE — — G — — — GAS LINE — — LE — — — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC — — sT — — STDRN SEWER LINE lk E'C EIV — —le— — — NEW SEWER LINE `, G — — W — — — NEW WATER LINE • DLEAN«,T FEB 0 5 1999 x( HYDRANT ■ ❑D CATCH BASIN DLIMPSTER City of So. Burlingto t 77 4 t! r CMRYSL ER-PLYMOM 10" %0-m Rm wm.., p. 11 �.yy1 SOUTH SOUIll BUIIGmNIVvwm •s_ g�t ! Q2�4w-w LL1 Of w 2 11 Q� J H 71 O } a_O w0 W IY J W Z _0 UO Z? o-1 0 m Z= � O to O U) SCALE: 30-1-0 DATE: PROG 01/12/9 DRAWN BY: mm CHECKED BY: GGL PROJECT: 99005 SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN DRAWING N0. L-1 PLANNING COMMISSION 23 SEPTEMBER 1997 The South Burlington Planning Commission a held a meeting Tuesday, 23 September 1997, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference om, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: Bill Burgess, Chair; Dan O'Rourke, Gayle Barone, John Dinklage Mark Crow, Marcel Beaudin Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Jim Lamphere, Lance Llewellyn, Gerry Milot, John Larkin, Greg Rabideau, Dean Zoecklein 1. Other Business: Mr. Weith advised that Item #6 on the Agenda had withdrawn. 2. Review Minutes of 26 August and 9 September 1997: Ms. Barone moved that the Mintues of 26 August be approved as written. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Dinklage abstaining. Ms. Barone moved the Minutesof 9 September be approved as written. Mr. Dinklage seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Public Hearing: Revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a minor revision to the parking and circulation layout of a recently approved planned unit development consisting of 30,310 sq. ft. of automobile sales and service use in two buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Crow stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Lamphere explained that they are taking out an island to improve circulation of traffic. They will stripe the parking area before they apply for a Certificate of Occupancy. No issues were raised. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Plannin final plat application of J.W. the parking and circulation la unit development consistingof and service use in two buiidin Road, as depicted on a three 'Saturn of South Burlington Si ton, Vermont," prepared by Civ dated June, 1992, last revised ulations• Commission approve the revised Realty for a minor revision to out of a recently approved planned 0, 310 'sq. 'ft.-of auf omobile sales_ s. 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne ge set of plans_, _page one entitled e Plan Shelburne Roach So. Bur1a.ng7 1 Engineering Associates, Inc_,_ 9/11/97, with the following stip- 6' - 4 PLANK G COMMISSION 23 Se tember 1997 Page, 2 1. 11 previousapprovals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The area indicated as to be striped on the landscape plan shall be strir)ed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occuo 3. Any changes to the plat plans shall re uire approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4. The final platplan (i.e. site plan sheet C-1) shall be re- corded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Com- mission Chair. or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Dinklage seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Crow rejoined the Commission. 4. Sketch plan application of EZP Golfco, Inc, to amend condi- tion #14 of Phase 1B of a planned residential development con- sisting of 173 single family lots, 16 duplex lots and 40 multi- family units and an 18 hole golf course, Dorset Street. Phase 1B consists of the creation of 75 lots. The amendment consists of amending condition #14 of the 6/18/96 approval: Mr.Zoeckl:ein explained that in order to build the road at a _500 ft. radius, they need to get a small piece of land from the Underwoods., It is difficult to talk with them about this due to Mr. Underwood's illness. In the meantime, they have submitted a sketch plan with a radius of 300 ft. so they can clear the corner without any land from the Underwoods. It will require a waiver to do that and also a waiver for setbacks on lot #35. Mr. Dinklage asked when.the road has to be built. Mr. Weith said it has to be built before building permits are issued for lots,on that road. He asked that some lots be moved around to maintain the setback. Mr. Beaudin suggested rerouting the road until the right-of-way can be acquired. Mr. Zoecklein said they want to remove the condition from the approval for Phase 18 so those lots can be sold. The issue can be addressed at a later time. Mr. Dinklage asked if the city will have adequate control if this is approved. Mr. Weith felt they would. Mr. Crow suggested' removing the condition only for the one side of Dorset St. that - is affected. Other members agreed. - Preliminary Comments February 9, 1999 agenda items January 25, 1999 Page 2 JAM GOLF, LLC & HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - RESUBDIVISION - REVISED FINAL PLAT survey plat sheet 1 of 7 should be revised to include the metes and bounds information between lots #85 and 86. DIANE & BRET KERNOFF - NIGHT CLUB - SITE PLAN — will seating remain at 42 seats? — the proposed change in use will result in increasing the number of vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour from 16.5 vte's to 38.1 vte's. This is a 21.6 vte increase. This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 2 which allows this property to generate a maximum of 5.8 vte's during the P.M. peak hour. Section 21.50 of the zoning regulations allows the Planning Commission to approve peak hour traffic volumes above that currently generated when that volume currently exceeds the limit of the Traffic Overlay District if the Commission determines that other site improvements will produce a net benefit for traffic flow. No such improvements are proposed. WIEMANN - LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - ADDITION - SKETCH PLAN — a total of 63 spaces are required for employees and customers. Staff counts 71 spaces provided, is this the number the applicant is now providing? The last approved plan showed 61 spaces provided. — building coverage information should be undated to include additional building footprint. 67) 0. 26 7 �4 �x) 4� ?/ Fvq, el (.4r/ T T1 ,/� /0/ -:- # w (y 1 5 �3/� 6 GG C. - I -= (l ) (Y 7 roL Y-1 7, "I1,�,, 'M" *120 x PD1 /30 op- T-6- v 4ee*l COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" C FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS `7 vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax ! c, assessment) K />,t5 units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION c,% s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE �'7 (� �vll Gtt (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION r I 1,t, _/,q4) IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) � Sgi yv� 9951 ��� 6&L FORM NR-1 4? /T FORM NR-Z COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END $ 226.00 / vte (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) n vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) ' (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) $ O-11 / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND v+y (4) x (5) $ (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ U•01 / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND / (4) x (7) $ l.�b (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $ (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From line (8) on Form NR-3) (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) $ / unit units / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE (13) X (14) TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND / (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) $ 6. (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) / unit E u (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - -� (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) $ ^�U (, FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) ( 6 ) LAND VALUE '(, �,44y (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 2 66 s.f. r $ / s.f. $���Sp /a57). 5 `p-g units CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 26, 1999 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William .Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, January 29, 1999. If you have any questions, please give me a call. jaymoSincely, nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RIB,,mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: February 9, 1998 Agenda Items Date: January 25, 1999 ALLENWOOD PHASE III - ALLEN ROAD Site plan should include water and sewer serving new addition also site drainage. SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER - PLYMOUTH - SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Cemetery to the north is City of South Burlington not City of Burlington. 2. Plan for City records should show water and sewer line and mains also drainage pipes that cross the property. FOOTLOOSE FRIDAYS - WILLISTON ROAD Plan preparer should be noted on the plan especially the plan for City records. It should also include the water and sewer lines that serve the property. VERMONT NATIONAL COUNTRY CLUB - DORSET STREET Site plans and plot plans with latest revision dated 12/23/98 prepared by Civil Engin rs ociates are acceptable. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: February 9 , 1999 agenda items Date: January 25, 1999 1) JAM Golf, LLC & Highlands Development, LLC Golf Course Road Acceptable 2) Bret Kernoff 1203 Williston Road The Fire Department requests that fire alarms be provided. 3) Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 1095 Shelburne Road Acceptable 4) John Larkin, Inc. 90 Allen Road Dated 12/31/98 Dated 1/6/99 Dated 1/18/99 Dated 12/ 10/98 If a new elevator is proposed for the addition, it should be large enough to accommodate a stretcher. 3/Doy 3O AID /�6D = �o. �� 7 %6� %��«S✓ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY C� In accordance with Section �2 .20�1of the Zoning Regulations the premises located at having been completed /I f6 6 as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No. - 4� dated /-. r--� — may now be used for / C rlUill� occupancy. Temporary Certificate valid for days. - 1 `ELT Zoning Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 29, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Modify Parking Lot Layout, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the September 23, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved on September 23, 1997 (effective October 15, 1997). Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ivicere'AY , Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY In accordance with Sect JLO of the oning Regulations the premises located at 16 9,� `� /— 6(// l .� having been completed 11 13 as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No. / �0 dated may now be used foroccupancy. Temporary Certificate valid for days. Zoning Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY V In accordance with Section 72Q.20,1off the Zoning Regulations the premises located at 10�5 having been completed �3 y as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No. dated (Pu may now be used for tl S LDS � )1a occupancy. P Y• Temporary Certificate valid for days. 0, W,l7 �T r Zoning Administrative Officer Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date 1/ 1 G pages"' To 4II / t' C V ! C3 G- From f Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # ( ` 5-_ G57611 Fax # City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 September 17, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Modify Parking Lot Layout, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 23, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. rely, Joe eith, Cit Planner JW/mcp Encls I 9/23/97 r 6k.' MOTION OF APPROVAL J.W.J. REALTY I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a minor revision to the parking and circulation layout of a recently approved planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road, as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Saturn of South Burlington Site Plan Shelburne Road So. Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated June, 1992, last revised 9/11/97, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The area indicated as to be striped on the landscape plan shall be striped prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 3. Any changes to the plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4. The final plat plan (i.e. site plan sheet C-1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner Re: September 23, 1997 agenda items Date: September 19, 1997 3) J.W.J. REALTY - PARKING LOT MODIFICATION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a plan previously approved on 5/27/97 (minutes enclosed) for a planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of a minor revision to the parking and circulation layout. This property located at 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the west by Fayette Road, on the south by L&M Park, on the east by Shelburne Road, and on the north by Hannaford Plaza and a cemetery. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 38 foot signalized driveway on Shelburne Road. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Entire PUD: Building coverage is 11% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parking: No change to the number of parking spaces available for employee and customer use. The parking lot layout for the new display lot was revised slightly by the applicant when an island was not constructed as shown on the approved plan. Staff informed the applicant that condition #9 of the 5/27/97 decision required that approval be obtained for any changes. Landscaping: No changes. Other: The area indicated as to be striped on the landscape plan should be striped before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. PLANNING COMMISSION 27 May 1997 page 6 Mr. Burgess asked when the condos would be built. Mr. Zoecklein said relatively soon. The golf course will be complete in September and the condos should be started about then. Mr. We.ith noted there are waivers required on frontage for the duplex lots. He also noted that 24,000 sq. ft. is the minimum required for a duplex lot and the applicant is requesting to put duplexes on a 15,000 sq. ft. lot. Mr. Burgess asked why the Commission should waive this requirement. Mr Zoecklein felt the smaller lot would work because of all the green space behind the lots. The buildings fit in the same footprint as the single family houses. Mr. Burgess felt this couldn't be considered "clustering," but is just putting twice the number of units in the same space. Mr. Teeson asked if this is the way the market says to go, will there be a doubling of the project. Mr. Zoecklein said there could be. Mr. Beaudin said he didn't want to see this as a trend. Ms. Barone asked when the traffic light will be installed at Dorset/Swift. Mr. Zoecklein said when some houses are built. If Summit at Spear isn't built by the time this project builds a house, this project will have to post a bond for the light. No other issues were raised. Hearing: 9. Public Revised Plat application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 27,750 sq. ft. of automobile sales and service use in two buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of 1) merging a 24,750 sq. ft. lot into the adjoioning lot creating a 5.3 acre PUD, 2) creating two lots within the PUD of 2.4 acres and 2.9 acres, and 3) constructing a 2,560 sq. ft. addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2: Mr. Crow stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Webster said they are asking for the approval for the Saturn addition but will probably not construct it for 2 years. Staff concerns include lighting and screening and dumpster screening. The dumpster is behind the building and the owner feels that because it is out of sight, he would rather not screen it. Commission members said they would not waive this requirement. PLANNING COMMISSION 27 May 1997 page 7 The applicant noted that existing lighting is 22 ft. high and they want to continue. this. Mr. Burgess said the regulations say 20 ft. and this can't be waived. Mr. Webster said their concern is security. He said cameras don't 31-ck up enough information with low level lights. They feel they can deal with light spillage off the property. Mr. Walback added the industry standard is between 80 to 100 foot candles in the first row of cars. Mr. Beaudin asked how many foot candles would be needed for the cameras to work. Mr. Walback said about 30. The site average is now 8.8. Mr. Teeson said he couldn't support the request as it would be setting a precedent. Other members agreed with the staff recommendation for a 5 foot candle average for the whole lot. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Planning Co_mmission�arove the revised final�olat_ application �of�Wiemann-Lamohere _Architects, In_c, to amend an approved planned unit development_ consisting of�27,750 s . ft. of automobile_ sales and service use twn_buiedings,�� 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne _Road. _The _ amendment_ consists of: 1 )�mereino�a 24, 750�sq. ft. lot into the adtoining lot creating as 5.34 acre P_UDF 2)_creatintwo lots �within �the PUD�of�2.41 acres_ and 2.93�acres, and �3)�cons_truc'tinq_a�2,560 so. ft. addition to the �auto �sales and service facilit�on�or000sed_lot �#2, as a-epictedon four tpage �set of plans, rage�one _entit_led "Plat of_ Boundarl Addustment Properties of JWJ Realt�Inc. and McLean Holdinq�Corporation �South �Burlington _Vermo_nt,""rrepared�by Civil_ Enpineerinno Associates., Inc., dated April, 1997,with �the followin sti ulations: 1. All �previous �approvals �and �stipulations�which �are not super- seded_b�this aooroval_shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of_a_zoning permit, the applicant shall post a_$3,000 landscape bond. The bond shall remain_ in effect for t_hreesears�to assure �that �the la_ndscapinetakes _root �and �has a �ood_chance �of surviving 3. For the purpose-of_calculatinq road impact fees under the South �Burlinoton�Impact Fee _Ordinance, �the PlanninogCommission estimates that the �proposed �addition will_cenerate 5.2�additional vehicle_triendsdurino the P.M. e.ak hour. 4.•The_applicant shall record in the land records a "Notice of Condition" which clearlvindicates ythat �this project constitutes a PUD�and �that �for rlannin�zonin2_and_subdivision _p rposes the entire_ property will be reoarded as_a�single �parcel �of land. This _document _shall recuire ap2rov'al�of�the City Attorney an_d_ shall _be�recorded�prior_to recordinb�the_final plat plans. PLANNING COMMISSION 27 May 1997 page 8 5. Any�new �exterior �lighting-shall consist of downcasti_ng shielded fixtures so as not to cast light_beyondthe Property line. _Any changes inlighting shall bbe_aporoved by the City_ Plannerrior to installations The pro posed-pole_lights shall be reduced in height_so_as�not �to_exceed the 20 foot hei_qht������� limitation. 6. Maximum illumination on t_heero ep-rty at-ground�level �shall _be reduced_so as not toexceed an average_of five �foot _candles. Prior to�recordinq thefinalplat plans., �the_aohllicantyshall submit �for -aproval�by_the CityPlannera_point by�point lightin plane whichindicates �that _the maximum_ illumination -atround level does not exceed an average of five _foot �candles. The livhting_pplan_-shall alsoberevised to significantly reduce the amount of light being cast upon adjoining property. 7. The -proposed sidewalk extension shall be constructed prior to the use of the new auto_dispa-y area -or the occupyinq_of the -auto sales and service�building_-additions, whichever comes first. _Prior to the start of construction of the sidewalk, the applicant shall posta bondin an amount approved by theCi_ty Engineer . The sidewalk shall be constructed to the specificati_o_n_s_ap rp owed by the Public Works Director. 8. The finalplat plans shall be revised to show the changes _below and shall require-approv_a_l of the City Planner. Three copies of the approved revised lans shall be submitted to the City Planner rior to recordin -------__��P g.: _a) Sheet L-1 shall be revised to indicate the t_ye p__of__ screeninq�used_forothe_dumpster on lot #2. The dum_pster and associated screening for lot #1 shall also be shown. b. The site information on sheet_L-1 shall be revised to indicate the _correct �overall _acreage__ ( i.e. , 55 . 34�acres)).. c) The additionalparkino_site plan, -sheet 1,_shall _be revised to -show the entire property d) The _survey _plat shall be revised to note that lot_ #1_is the�southerly lot and lot #2 is thenortherly lot. - 9.-Any chaanges-to_the_plat -plans shalluo�re ire_approval_by_the South Burlin ton Plannin Commission . _ 10.-The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupant ZCom- oliance from the Administrative Officer �prior_to�use of -the new auto ddiisplay area and prior to occupancy_of the auto sales and service building addition. PLANNING COMMISSION 27 May 1997 page 9 11. The _final�plat plans_(i.e., subdivision_plat�and �site Plan) shall be�recorded �in the land records within 90 days or this aPprrovaleisenull eand evoid. Theeplans_shall be signed by the Planning_ Commission_ Chair_ or Clerk _prior _to_recording- The plans shall �be_recorded �prior �to_issuance of a zoning_permit. Prior to recordingthe efinal �plat plans, the �abolicanteshall ysubmit eae�copy of the survey �blat_in digital format. The format�olf—the�digital information �shall _be�approved �by the_-��Planner.�__ 12. A zoning_permit(s)_for _the parking_expansion �and �buildinE addition shall be obtained within two years �of_this _final _plat abbrovaleorethis eapproval isenull eand �void. Ms. Barone_ seconded. Motionpassed Beaudin As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m GARAGE SALES 4 WILLISTON 6 Porter Wood Dr. Sat & Sun, 9-4. Something for everyone - A variety of things! WILLISTON Sept 5th, Sat. only! 9-4. Baby items, little girl's clothes, bar stools, woodstove, bikes and more. 43 River Cove Rd (off Rt 2A) WINOOSKI 11 & 13 Florida Ave, near St. Mike's. Sept. 5, 6, 7. 9- 613M. Furniture, antiques, clothes, and mist. Everything goes! WINOOSKI 2 family sale. Furniture, toys, house- hold items, children and adult clothing. Fri, noon- 6pm, Sat Sam-?. 201 West Street. 655-9727. WINOOSKI 59 Cedar St., Sat & Sun, 9-5. Baby clothes & furniture, kids clothes & misc. 655-2765 WINOOSKI-Annual multi family sale Sat, Sept 6, 9-2. 4 Lapointe St. Home furnishings, quality clothing & more. WINOOSKI Huge 2 family Moving Sale. 163-165 West Allen St. Sat & Sun, 9-5. WINOOSKI Sat 9/6, 8-4. Compact fridge, 2 dress- ers, TV, 2 micorwaves & more! 177 North St. WINOOSKI used clothing sale, lots of girls & wom- en's clothes, toys, misc. household. Orchard Terr. (off North St.) Sat & Sun 9-4. WINOOSKI Yard & bake sale, Sun. 9/7, 9am - 4 pm, VFW parking lot, 6 Maple St. Sponsored by Ladies Auxiliary. PERSONALS 6 CARIBBEAN CRUISE trip for two. Spend 3 days in Caribbean & 4 days in Florida. rental car, air -fare not included. $875 (for two) Call 802-658-1999. TO MY FRIEND, MY DAD I was born 3/10/51 in Burlington, I have memories of our visit in Putnam, CT. Do you re- call how you said I was oyour special little girl and your would always love me. Please follow your heart. Gail, P.O. Box 626, Dayville, Ct. 06241 ADULT 8 ENTERTAINMENT ESCORT EXCELLENCE The only call you'll need to make! Outcall only. 863-9510 * FANTASY Entertainment Inc Male & female dancers. * 1-800-347-2468 ■ ■ � wwr■w��rc LEGAL 11 LEGAL 11 LEGAL I 1 EMNLOYMENI NOTICES I NOTICES I NOTICES ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Newport 74 Main Street Newport, VT 05855 Separate sealed BID for the construction f Derby Road -New rt Water Transmis on Main will be receive by City of Newport at the office of City Man ger, 74 Main Street, New ort, VT 05855 until 1 :00 a.m., September 81 1997, and then at s id office publicly open and read aloud. If BID are forwarded by mail, the sealed envelope con- taining the BID must be enclosed in another en- velope addressed to the City Manager, City of Newport, 74 Main Street, Newport; VT 05855. Each BID must be ac- companied by a certified check payable to the OWNER for five percent (5%) of the total amount of the BID. A BID bond may be used in lieu of a certified check. Bidders are reminded that "Federal Wage Rates -Davis -Bacon Act" does not apply to the WORK. The CONTRACT DOCU- MENTS may be exam- ined at the following lo- cations: City of Newport, City Manager's Office, 74 Main Street, Newport, VT; Webster -Martin, Inc., 1025 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT; Associated General Contractors of Vermont, c/o Reprographics of New England, 4049 Will- iston Road, South Bur- Ifngton, VT 05403; F.W. Dodge Plan Rooms, 20 Farrell Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. Copies of the CON- TRACT DOCUMENTSs may be obtained at the office of: Webster -Martin, Inc. lo- cated at 1025 Airport Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 upon payment of $50 00 for each set. A Performance BOND and a Payment BOND each in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price, will be required. Minimum wage rates and public work employment laws are applicable. Any BIDDER, upon re- turning the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS within 30 days after the actual date of BID opening and in good condition, will be refunded his payment, either Corporation. September 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7, 1997 SOUTH BURLINGTO PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on September 23, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Revised final plat - ation of J.W.J. alty for inor Ion to the par I and circula- tion layout of a recently approved planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildinggs, 1085, 1089 and i095 Shelburne Road. 2) Appeal of Gabriel Handy regarding the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of Sections 22 and 8 of the South Burlington Sign Ordi- nance as it relates to the applicant's free standingg sign located at 1016 Shelburne Road. Copies of the application and appeal are available for Public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission September 6, 1997 REQUESTFOR PROPOSALS The Burlington School District requests propos- als for a public relations plan. Firms with experi- ence in working with schools and non-profit organizations preferred. Inquiries and proposals should be addressed to: Office of the Superintendent Burlington School Dist 150 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 Attn: Communication Plan Deadline for proposals is September 17, 1997. September 6 & 7, 1997 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Reggulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Mu- nicipal Offices, Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, feet (lower level) of an existing (12,000 square foot) building for long term automobile storage aQd to operate an auto se ice business in con- juna ion with vehicle stor- age. Existing use of the buil ng (6000 square feet) is a distribution stor ge facility d.b.a. The To Shop Inc., located at 87 than Allen Drive. F# Appeal of Michael & a Murphy seeking a ariance from Section F. Dimensional and lot coverage require- ments of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to construct a detached 16'x22' garage to within one foot six inches (1'6") of the northerly side yard, pro- posed garage and exist- ing structures exceed to- tal lot coverage by eight (8) percent (maximum coverage 20 percent) lo- cated at 3 Woodcrest Drive. Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer September 6, 1997 Town of Huntington Notice The legal voters of the Town of Huntington are warned and notified that an informational meeting will be held at the Brew- ster Pierce Memorial School in said town on September 16, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of discussing the follow- ing Article which will be voted on by the Austral- ian Ballot System on Tuesday, September 23, 1997: ARTICLE 1 Shall the Town of Hunt- ington, acting through the Selectboard, apply to the Vermont Agency of Commerce and Commu- nity Development for a Community Development Block Grant, in the amount not to exceed $450,000, for the pur- pose of purchasing and renovating the Fuller House in the Lower Vil- lage as a post office. And, if the grant is awarded, do all things nedessary to administer the grant? The warning for the Australian Ballot Vote will follow at a later date as outlined in Vermont Statutes. For additional informa- tion, special needs, etc. call 434-2032. Huntington Select Board September 6, 1997 TO RESPON TO A FREE PRES BOX NUMBEi Send to: Burlington Free Pre P.O. Box 10 Burlington, VT 054C Att: Free Press E ACCOUNTANT NHC, makers HearthStone stoves E HearthStone Hydror boilers and radiatc seeks temporary countant to fulfill vac ties due to persc leave. Experience v. accounting softwE package (A/R; A/P); N. dows Quattro Pro/W Perfect: and AS in counting preferred. pending business r lead to regular posi for qualified, flex team player. Immed Opportunity. NHC, Box 1069, Morrisville. 05661 Fax 802-888-7_ EOE. ACCOUNTS REC.i BOOKKEEPER needed for small r duction facility. Must multi -task oriented strong communica skills. Computer exr ence helpful. Send sume with salary his to L.D. Oliver Seed P.O. Box 156, Milton 05468. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE CLE Applicants must 1- prior accounting, tomer service skills terested parties can resume to: 802-893 or fill out application Plastic Monofil, 28 in trial.Drive. Milton, VT ADMINISTRATI ASST Seeking pe, skilled in: Organiza' communication, tyF computer network Boo kkeeping/Acco ing. Please submit C letter•& resume to: Cots CPA, PC 5 Knight Lane, P.O. 1405, Williston, 05495-1405 or fax:802-878-1449. ADMINISTRATIV ASSISTANT Civil neering firm seeks c fied applicants. 25 1- s/week; word proces & spreadsheet ex ence required. Fax sumo to 862-5590. "Sold the First D We hear this every from successful vertisers. Free P Classifieds work. us at 658-3321. can help you r your ad work. _ PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on September 23, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a minor revision to the parking and citculation layout of a recently approved planned unit development consisting of 30,310 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. 2) Appeal of Gabriel Handy regarding the Zoning Administrator's interpretation of Sections 22 and 8 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance as it relates to the applicant's free standing sign located at 1016 Shelburne Road. Copies of the application and appeal are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission September 6, 1997 M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, September 23, 1997 Agenda Items Date: September 11, 1997 J.W.J. REALTY - PARKING LOT MODIFICATION - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- the site plan should be revised to show the entire site. EZP GOLFCO, INC. - AMEND PHASE 1B CONDITIONS - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plan application should be completed and submitted. --- plans should be submitted showing alternative alignments in the event the Underwood's do not agree to the currently approved alignment. The Commission will want to be assured that some kind of connection will be made. If the alternative alignments require any waiver from the City's standards, they should be noted. JOHN LARKIN & GERRY MILOT - ADD 2 MULTI -FAMILY BUILDINGS - SKETCH PLAN --- the private cul-de-sac street serving the proposed 60 residential units exceeds the 50 unit limit under Section 401.1(g) of the subdivision regulations. --- plan should show all existing easements. --- plan should show the type, size and location of all existing and proposed water and sewer lines. --- plan should include a location map. --- building coverage and overall coverage maximums are 20% and 40% respectively not 30% and 70% as indicated on the plan. --- all coverage calculations should include the bank lot. --- the two (2) apartment buildings at the southeast corner of the site were previously approved as a hotel, is the applicant requesting that this hotel be converted to residential units? --- does the 33.5 acre lot size noted on plan include the area of Fayette Road? If it does, the plan should be revised to not include the road area and the coverages adjusted accordingly. --- the northern most building should be moved away from the wetland buffer. The wetland and wetland buffer should not be disturbed in any way including fill, mowing, etc. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: September 23, 1997 Agenda Items Date: September 11, 1997 SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan prepared by Civil Engineering Associates dated April, 1997 is acceptable. L&M PARK - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plan dated 10/24/96 and received 9/9/97 prepared by Gregory Rabideau Architect is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for September 23, 1997 agenda Date: September 5, 1997 1) JWJ Realty, Inc. Dated 8/26/97 1095 Shelburne Road Acceptable City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 11, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Modify Parking Lot Layout, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, September 15, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since elyy/, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT I ) Name of Applicant Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 2 ) Name of Subdivision JWJ Realty 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application Surveyor & Engineer - Civil Engineering Associates Shelburne, Vermont (802) 985 2323 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Parking Lot - Spring '97 (REVISED 8/97) Addition - 1998 or 1999 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and clpntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations fro a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for ajor division. (Signat applAcant or contact person Date FAYE17CO, INC. — .SEWER r-StWr NoEA � EASEMENT I.er19t5o —, _ IM...Kl3 .tv. TIT 'ob DUMPSTER j I % W/ENCLOSURE i BURIJNGTON MALL INC. 1 yy ---x— _"a �IksBwI . j EXISING EDGE pRcro�Q ADDITION .! OF P i — r r � pN � y j i ,4- \ FAYETTCO, INC. c dA Rift P 40 DRAINAGE EASEMENT I ..nrT d' 1.DM__-1. co. GRtr W I: ,j Ir / Ir Ol Mwl10E►1Q R00R WDOD 11 ELEV. ] WMPS TCR ' IM97 arvr7 e / w/FNCLOSURE C Sou tN M unMq(oew CNr PI tN -1- RiIOYC C110T. u d ptlNi ." C.L WIA.t.NE LINT C'N.NS- gnp � 1b.K. i IeY.e/ ABiY! Kleltl0 Rool. CLEV. I � , / •• NY.1gW M.7 +{p wF.. NCr CONfXTC Md py�M.. •"y ,7 oar rLECTI!JL T 0- rnso.NT � ct7acl�Tt rAvtp T r �A 77,,,,�� tP' / 0F." Dodo err~- A7 9.' .drti Div.- ti Rtl.tt6� g / ! IKTr arT9..Id.IEtOR LOOP 0ET[C70M11 .� ._ h�I/.vN D I pqi pM II a rDWa�t ` WAIL `COItG \DIG b -- .tt•OW ' y. ; Te.G _. L ZOt ND PLANE rO �NT� 1; GALLON SEPARATOR I a RECE�VED CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTON SEP 1 1997 CEMETERY City of So. Burlington LEGEND: Efst..D p.word., I 1 it rl rlfl II'ail II -I 1--I 'cw Nv ear ex -` rear NNOKD R11LDING . 9177 � naRnl SCALE. I- . 0.6 .... GIRL its. 1. tfltti s atllltlw .ro1o.. .pptowtet' ely .od ey I.ot bo '.oploto. T1r C'wtr.'tor .r11 flood verity '11 u Illty tooflitt. Mfeo wt.ect ie Mete. All dlwrepwlw .Mll M ropwtol [ tM 7.tlwaor. Tyr cowtrwtor —11 tots. Dlg S.f. (.125-e977) Prtw a .wy cwtrvtt law. 2. TM Covet .... .Mll topatt/tew'te .11 diotwrod • . dlret .r fod1— —it of tr. --too .t a toot to to. Goer. 1. 5wetee c.w'ttw o►oll M oodo poly .ftw .rerotel t 'Loetoe 'f All -q.ler [vet. ae tM _ lie. A. All err ettrie the A'ot. 7 rtgM-.(- oy drll be cepL'tM i..eewd'wee ettr tM City of Saett 9wllo,,te W too ApwoY of Tcooe9o-otie r'geit0000to. Ca.trwter tM .roll dew1N 7r-pent Dr'siop dool" certtldtle to be oeWet tt.d to Over •t [M ''L.tle tM prelet. e. All dt.terbod rw •Mll Io et—tood by too C rwtw —il t.11 vogotot too t. ubrllsrod. 7. All o.l.tiog po•o.et, '.lr'oye. —big. .trwtotee W rtillttoo ell►l. tM o ootrettloa halts W mot "ow►w'w Ie tM flea deA.p or.11 be dlep000d of of a •pp—W loeetleo eA'ow otM.e/e dttooted. All tree .,.bi. [M 'eotrwtle Naito tort cooe't M eiou/ .Mal M 'Looted rd gteMod, W [M .toopo •Mal M di'poed of at ' o'dt'Ne '11-AM I.,e. All [troe roped tM '.rtte[le llodte "ALL be ...---------70. - - - - - - EXISTING GRADE CONTOURS 1111t4 S.— i.tet..tiw .roe 'w tri. plr er -Mood tre .'r..r pI- by Pool Mrc'tt', r'V1W Kier It. 1971. lr FINISH GRADE CONTOURS PROPERTY uNE -- EASEMENT — -- SETBACK POWER POLE p/RA EX. L047 POU /NEW LIGHT POLE EDGE OF WOODS OR BRUSH NOTE: SEE ARCHTECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING a' TREE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. :.� EXISTING SHRUB • SHUT-OFF VALVE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATER LINE OWNER OF RECORD. TBURNEE — — c — GAS LINE 095 SSHREALTY LN ROAD SOUTH BIRiIWGTON, VT — —,v— .UNOERGROUND POWER n NEW SEWER LINE NEW WATER LINE c NEW GAS LINE t • [ NEW UND. ELEC. N TELE LINE GRAPHIC SCALE • C EANOUT ♦ HYDRANT • CATCH BASIN ( O raw ) to.. - So N. — — —• -�- o — w - -1.0. - — — — �IDST3/'1�- — - - - — — - - - - - ---: ,.,� 7M-_IT :I—IREP+rVrf NII I ss — --r- SS _- .._ '•�Y _- _ _—S5_aw (0,01 T 94t.. M173 `..,M � +n.-�n56f ` w'r SAV PF]+YD ...rta' SATURN OF SOUTH BURUNGTON -. SHELBURNE ROAD r. tNrwwtt.Nrow•..at. SITE PLAN T`r "��O'O�`�`•a`t�WT' APPROVED By RESOLUT!014 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIC'+ OF — _-_--- -� -- _ T' HE TOWN OF SO. BURLINGTON, VFRMONT ON THE 9i9e .u. .EV. poom ert•a etr LA. g IMoor :� _ _•— _ _ '9—, SUBJECT -7, THE REOUiREMENTS AND Do$. Cara R*-- SH"URNE ROAD 0 n,RUNGT�, rRNONT CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED -­ S DAY Dt by A ow SWET J. !t D. WESSON N. do S. PAPPAS. PERRY REST. GROUP OF 9— BY CHAIRPERSON. cr.crw a s.v fig» r. 5a C111� RING ASSOCIATES. INC. 57Le1LIRIa.LIeaIo9IF C-1 A.pOy.� by 5Av prol.Dt Me. 911M �'ry7 X�a It , -51p- ` ` " W/,W,A,F,j, _ City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 19, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on May 27, 1997 (effective June 17, 1997). Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (September 15, 1997) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please giv me a call. in er 1 /+ Jo Weith, Ci y Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 18, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is a copy of the May 27, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please gm Si ce Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl y M r 5/27/97 4 MOTION OF ••• WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 27,750 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the adjoining lot creating a 5.34 acre PUD, 2) creating two (2) lots within the PUD of 2.41 acres and 2.93 acres, and 3) constructing a 2,560 square foot addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2, as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Plat of Boundary Adjustment Properties of JWJ Realty Inc. and McLean Holding Corporation South Burlington Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April, 1997, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $3000 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed addition will generate 5.2 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. The applicant shall record in the land records, a "Notice of Condition" which clearly indicates that this project constitutes a PUD and that for planning, zoning and subdivision purposes the entire property will be regarded as a single parcel of land. This document shall require approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans. 5. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any changes in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to. installation. The proposed pole lights shall be reduced in height so as not to exceed the 20 foot height limitation. 6. Maximum illumination on the property at ground level shall be reduced so as not to exceed an average of five (5) foot candles. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit for approval by the City Planner a point by point lighting plan 1 which indicates that the maximum illumination at ground level does not exceed an average of five (5) foot candles. The lighting plan shall also be revised to significantly reduce the amount of light being cast upon adjoining property. 7. The proposed sidewalk extension shall be constructed prior to the use of the new auto display area or the occupying of the auto sales and service building addition, whichever comes first. Prior to the start of construction of the sidewalk, the applicant shall post a bond in an amount approved by the City Engineer. The sidewalk shall be constructed to the specifications approved by the Public Works Director. 8. The final plat plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a Sheet L-1 shall be revised to indicate thy t f scr en'n used for the dumpster on lot #2. �Lt-v �W r j -o � 01 _W ( , b) The site information on sheet L-1 shall be revised to indicate the correct overall acreage (i.e., 5.34 acres). c) The additional parking site plan, sheet 1, shall be revised to show the entire property. d) The survey plat shall be revised to note that lot #1 is the southerly lot and lot #2 is the northerly lot. 9. Any changes to the plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 10. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the new auto display area and prior to occupancy of the auto sales and service building addition. 11. The final plat plans (i.e., subdivision plat and site plan) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. The plans shall be recorded prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall be approved by the City Planner. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on May 27. 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1) Revised final plat ap- plication of John Larkin to amend an approved planned unit develop- ment consistiN of a 200 `room hotel and restau- rant, MO ­Shelburne Road. The amendment] consists of constructing' a covered drop-off area for guests. 2) Revised final plat ap- plication of Wlemann- Lamphere Architects, Inc. to amend an ap- proved planned unit de- velopment consisting of 27,750 square feet of au- tomobile sales and serv- ice use in two (2) build- ings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the ad1'oining lot creating a 5. yin PUD, 2) lots within the PUD of 2.4 acres and 2.9 acres, and 3) constructing a 2,560 square foot addition to the auto sales and serv- ice facility on proposed lot #2. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 10, 1997 I AL OCES r (HDPE) lined biosolids emergency storage la - con ' one biosolids belt filter press for dewater- ing, and one steam heated paddle for bioso- lids drying. The applica- tion has been reviewed in accordance with the Vermont Solid Waste Management Act, 10 V.S A. Section 6601 et.seq. and the Vermont Solid Waste Manage- ment Rules, effective February 7, 1994. In accordance with the review process, a Fact Sheet and Draft Certifi- cation have been pre- pared for this applica- tion, and public comment on this document is hereby solicited. The Draft Certification and Fact Sheet docu- ments are available for public inspection at the Town Clerk's Office in Georgia, Vt, the Town of Georgia Solid Waste Committee, the Franklin County Regional Plan- ning Commission, and at the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Wastewater Manage- ment Division offices in Waterbury. A copy of the document may also be obtained by written re- quest to the Wastew�r Management Division a the address below. Any questions or com- ments concerning the draft document can be made until 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 30, 1997. Comments should be addressed to: Jeff Robins Residuals Management Section 103 South Main St.- Sewing Bldg Waterbury VT 05671_0405 • Tel. (802)241-3548 o FAX (802)241-2596 May 10. 1997 Convert clutter ta_ �crash Kith a Free Press Classifier# ad Coll 658-3321. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION .GAL 11 1 ant, 1720 Shelburne , load. The amendment :onsists of constructing t covered drop-off area or guests. ?) Revised final plat ap- )lication of Wiemann- _amphere Architects, nc. to amend an ap- proved planned unit de- velopment consisting of 27,750 square feet of au- tomobile sales and serv- ice use in two (2) build- ings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the adJJ'oining lot creating a 5.3 acre PUD, 2) lots within the PUD of 2 4 acres and 2.9 acres, and 3) constructing a 2,560 square foot addition to the auto sales and serv- ce facility on proposed lot #2. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall, William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission Mav 10, 1997 IOTICES Aay 15, 1997 at 2 pm, at he Town of Essex Mu- licipal Office, 81 Main it, Essex Jct, VT 05452. it which time all bids will )e publicly opened and ead. Mav 8, 9, 10, 11 1997 —6 Employment :MPLOYMENT 12 TO RESPOND TO A FREE PRESS BOX NUMBER Send to: Burlington Free Press P.O. Box 10 Burl in on, VT 05402 Att: Fr e Press Bo ACCO NTANT/BOOK KEEPER full time, fu benefits, salary negoti tie. Miller, Deverell Co., CPAs, in Middle WINOOSKI hurv.388-6307. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A public hearing will be held in the Claire Burke Council Chambers, Wi- nooski City Hall, 27 West Allen St. on Thursday, May 22, 1997 at 6i30 PM to fear the following ap- plicsnt(s): #97-11 Andy Valley is recuesting a setback variance for a side en- trance and stairs at 87 Bellevue Street in the R- 1-B district in accord- ance with the provisions of Article VII Section B.100 of the municipal zoning ordinance. All documents are avail- able for review at the Zoning Office of City Hall. The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on May 27, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1) Revised final plat ap- piication of John Larkin to amend an approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of a 200 room hotel and restau_ Convert stoner to ca a Free Press Cea od. \ Can ass - Agenda available in alter- native media form for people with disabilities. For disability access in- formation, call 655-641& Ray O'Connor Building Zoning Administrator May to. 1997 THE TOWN OF ESSEX is accepting bids to 1500 cubic yards c stripped clean topsa The specifics can be of tamed by calling Esse Town Parks atand Recre� tion Dept. The due date for sealed bids is Thursda FREE WOODEN SKIDS • • THE BURLIN�GTON�FREE PRESS 0 x a" 12 EMPLVTm�N EM MPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATIVE Ai- ASST MOR/CREDIT & AL in- ST SISTANT Environmental COLLECTIONS an is organization, 20 hrsiwk. ternat'I trade Svcs co, au Asst Mgr/ ce Computer exper. re- $8/hr Resumes seeking an Credit & Collections to 4C quired. to CNAD, 156 College St. be located in St. Albans, ply 2nd Floor, Burlington, VT VT. The successful can- or 05401 by 5/28, no calls. Bachelorste ) Degrees in C Champlain Cable Corpor- Business or related field, — ation, a division of Swiss w/3-5 yrs exper in credi- based Huber & Suhner t/collection management. cf AG, manufactures speci- Excel. communication, leader- tc alty wire and cable for in- dustrial, automotive and negotiation, and ship skills, with theabiiity cl data communications to work in a totally qual- v Excel markets. ADMINISTRATIVE ity environment. benefit pkg. SendSECRETARY cover letter with resume to A.N. Dennger. Inc.. Champlain Cable seeks attn: Personnel Dept., AI- an Administrative Secre- po Box 1309, St. tary, to fill various admin- bans,VT 05478 to be istrative responsibilities rcvd by 5/28/97, No c including typing, filing, and phone calls, please. travel arrangements. Ideal AUTO BODY candidate will have ci appropriate Associates TECHNICIAN Degree and 3-5 years pre- immediate opening for a vious experience working qualified auto body techni- r q in similar environment. clan. Qualified applicant c Qualifications would in- should have a minimum of t elude proficiency in Mi- 10 years auto body expe- clude Word, Excel and osof t rience and be able to int, strong cam- Power oin P both complete all phases of skills, municwritten and verbal, and collision repair. Frame and Unibody repair expe-'I the ability to work with minimal guidance. Please rience highly desirable. Must have own tools. We visit our website at offer a very competitive champcable.com to learn more about our company ge, along with a com- benefit park- II Interested candidates p, re - age including a 401 k a,e Including should apply to: & pp y aid tirement plan and paid Vice President, - Human Resources vactions. We have a consistent level of Champlain Cable strong clean late model work. _ Corporation h has state of the ACCOUNTANT/ FULL -CHARGE BOOKKEEPER Non-profit organization seeks experienced ac- countant/full-charge bookkeeper to perform all accounting functions through preparation of financial statements. De- gree n accounting plus 3 years experience re- quired. 32 hours per week. Additional hours as needed. 4 weeks va- cation to start plus flexi- ble benefits package. Send cover letter and re- sume by May 16 to CCR, 28 Commerce St., Willis- ton, VT 05495. ACCOUNTANT Bilodeau, Wells & Company, PC a dynamic CPA firm has a career growth opportu- nity for CPA/Candidate with 1-3 years experi- ence. Must be computer and tax literate. Fax re- sume and salary history to 879-1016. AD ASSIE STANT extremely efficient high level Administrative Assistant. Must have 3 years related experience and a Human Resources background For the f Stowe area Call Larry TAD t Employment Services 658-5007 NO FEE 12 Hercules Drive Colchester, VT 05446 Our s op art equipment incl. Chief EX Liner bencchapter or -FAX (802) 654-4234 Saico down draft booth ADMINISTRATIVE and Spies Hecker Paint. Call for a Confidential in - ASSISTANT FT position for an in- terview. LEWIS MOTORS - dividual W/excellent organizational, writing LEWIS ACURA 1325 ShelburneoutRd & proofreading skills. ag word pro- So Burlinggton, VT Days 802-658-1130 cessing, spreadsheet cessing, - & database mgmt AUTO DEALER abilities required. Send resume to: Managers Analytical Services, ATT: Personnel We recruit experiences managers for dealers in Inc, Dept., PO Box 515, VT, NH & ME. Call CAR PEOPLE 800-930-2331 . Williston, VT OS489• Confidential --No Fee ASBESTOS SUPERVI- - SOR Trained, updated. FT. start immediately, - good pay. 660-8899 ASSISTANT MANAGER Nights and weekends, 40 his per week, $7!hr. Ap- ply at Pearl Street Bever- age, 240 Pearl St.. Burlington. ATHLETIC CO -CURRICULAR POSITIONS The Colchester School District seeks qualified candidates for the follow- ing co -curricular positrons for the 1997 1998 school year Applicants must be commuted to supporting the school district's MIS - sion and recently devel- oped strategic plan. S • Boys Baseball (CMS) • Girls Basketball (CMS) ADMINISTRATIVE •C�S)Field Hockey ASSISTANT • Girls Softball (CMS) Diversified Telecommu- • Girls Varsity Basketball nication is launching a telephone installation di- (CHS) • JV Field Hockey (CHS) vision. We have an im- for a • Varsity Wrestling (CHS) mediate opening full-time Administrative tes submit a letter oterested aeo Assistant. Complete range of office skills re- must lication, raa+­ three '"•� quired,including an w� .r SELL "IDLE ITEMS" NITM A CUSSIMD AD. CALL liss=1 AUTOMOTIVE SALES Looking for team member to join our expanding autc dealership. Must be ca- reer minded. New & pre- owned auto sfoExcell- lent opportunity sere candidate Contac Joe Gratton or Dan Hanc gam-5pm. Mon -Fri fcr a interview Handy Chevrolet Oldsmobile 524-9737 AUTO SALES Do you want the or tunity to make^ an lent income" fit- No Text Memorandum - Planning May 27, 1997 agenda items May 23, 1997 Page 8 8) WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, SUBDIVISION & AUTO SALES & SERVICE ADDITION - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totaling 27,750 square feet. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the adjoining lot creating a 5.34 acre PUD, 2) creating two (2) lots within the PUD of 2.41 acres (lot #1) and 2.93 acres (lot #2), and 3) constructing a 2560 square foot addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2. The ZBA on 3/10/97 approved a request from the applicant for a use variance for the auto sales and service addition. The sketch plan was reviewed on 2/25/97 (minutes enclosed) . The property located at 1085, 1089, and 1095 Shelburne Road lies within the C1 District. It is bounded on the west by Fayette Road, on the south by L&M Park, on the east by Shelburne Road, and on the north by Hannaford Plaza and a cemetery. PUD "Notice of Condition": Even though two lots are being created, this development constitutes a PUD and therefore will be reviewed by the City as one (1) lot for zoning and subdivision purposes. A "Notice of Condition" should be recorded which clearly identifies this entire development as a PUD and that it will be reviewed as one lot for zoning and subdivision purposes. The applicant has requested that the development not be treated as one lot for sign purposes so that they may erect a separate free standing sign on lot #2. Staff does not see a problem with this request since both lots will meet the minimum frontage requirement for the district of 200 feet. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 38 foot signalized driveway on Shelburne Road. No changes proposed. The existing curb cut serving 1085 Shelburne Road will be eliminated. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Entire PUD (i.e., combined lots #1 and 2) : Building coverage is 11% (maximum allowed is 30 0) . Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%) . Front yard coverage is 12. 2% (maximum allowed is 30%) . Lot #1: Building coverage is 13.1% (maximum allowed is 30%) . Overall coverage is 64.5% (maximum allowed is 70%) . Front yard coverage is 17.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Lot #2: Building coverage is 9% (maximum allowed is 30%) . Overall coverage is 74.4% (maximum allowed is 70%) . Front yard coverage is 6.5% (maximum allowed is 30%) . The Commission can waive the coverage for lot #2 since this lot is part of a PUD, and the coverage for the entire PUD is not being exceeded. �tiaNU 8 \ �� r Memorandum - Planning May 27, 1997 agenda items May 23, 1997 Page 9 The existing buildings and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $3000 which is being met. Proposed plantings include Red Maple. Parking: A total of 61 parking spaces are required for customers and employees and 61 spaces are provided including five (5) handicapped spaces. The landscape plan should be revised to clearly indicate all 61 spaces which are devoted to customer and employee parking. A bike rack will be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement of 40,000 square feet is being met. The minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet is being met. Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate a 174 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the current facility to generate 72.7 vte's and with the proposed addition to generate 77.9 vte's which is a 5.2 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be $0. Lighting: Additional exterior lighting will match existing lighting and will consist of: --- six (6) 1000 watt super metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on three (3) 24 foot high poles. The Performance Standards in the zoning regulations limit the height of pole lights to 20 feet. Proposed poles must be reduced in height to meet this requirement. A point by point lighting plan was submitted indicating that the average illumination on the site is 8.8 foot candles. The Performance Standards limit the average illumination to three (3) foot candles. Enclosed is an opinion from the City Attorney which supports staff's interpretation of this provision. The site lighting is excessively bright. The Outdoor Lighting Manual recommends an average light level of no more than 5.0 foot candles for auto display areas. Staff is also concerned with the amount of direct light spilling over property lines. The point by point lighting plan shows light levels of up to 25 foot candles along the west and north property lines. It should be noted that the point by point lighting plan does not include building mounted lights, therefore, the light levels on the site are most likely significantly more than 8.8 foot candles. 0 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 23, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 27, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. jSi cerely Jo Weith, Ci Planner JW/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 25 February 1997 page 7 planned to put the 4 units on the newly acquired land; however, after discussions with the city, they decided to merge the properties and add the units near the other multi -family buildings. They got a variance from the Zoning Board allowing the transfer of the units to the original piece of land. Nine parking spaces are required for the addition. They will add 19. They will also take down one old carport and add two new ones. The new buildings will be similar in style and design to the existing multi -family buildings. The main issue is whether a development of this size can have only one access. Mr. Carroll noted there are a number of areas where there could be a second access; however, the Planning Commission has always felt it would be safer not to open them. Mr. Weith said the city is now in court over denying an application because of the maximum 50 units with a single access rule. He felt it would not be wise to waive the requirement for a second access in this instance. Mr. Carroll said they could provide an emergency access and showed a possible location which would access onto Oakwood. They could also go over Pines property. Mr. Burgess encouraged having an access over property owned and controlled by the applicant. Other members didn't have any preference for a location but agreed it would be easier if it were on property owned by the applicant. No other issues were raised. 5. Sketch plan application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a commercial complex consisting of two buildings totaling 27,750 sq. ft.. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 sq. ft. lot into the adjoining lot creating a 5.3 acre PUD, 2) creating two lots within the PUD of 2.4 acres (lot #1) and 2.9 acres (lot #2) and 3) constructing a 2560 sq. ft. addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2, 1085, 1089, and 1095 Shelburne Road: Mr. Webster showed the location of the existing Saturn and Chrysler -Plymouth buildings and where the proposed addition would go. He noted that the existing tennis facility building has been taken down. The applicant is proposing to create two abutting lots with a PLANNING COMMISSION 25 FEBRUARY 1997 page 8 shared curb cut. There are 2 sets of investors. be for Saturn and one for Chrysler -Plymouth. One lot would Mr. Burgess said the Commission understands that the motivation for this is so they can have two signs. He asked if Saturn cars would be parked on the Chrysler -Plymouth lot and vice versa. Mr. Weith noted that the proposed property line actually goes through some of the parking spaces, but he had no problem with that. Mr. Teeson said that although they are calling this a PUD, it appears that either lot could now be sold separately. Mr. Burgess said they would then have to get the PUD reapproved. Mr. Teeson added they would also have a parking problem then. Mr. Burgess reminded the appicant that the Planning Commission doesn't handle sign requestsand that they would have to go to the Zoning Administrator with their case for two signs. 6. Site plan application of BLS Properties to construct a 1200 sq. ft. addition to an existing 44,703 sq. ft. medical office building, 52 Timber Lane: Mr. Long showed where the addition would go. He said there would be no changes affecting the development as a whole (circulation, lighting, etc.). The only outstanding issues are parking and landscaping. Regarding landscaping, Mr. Long said they had been asked to chart the location'of all plantings on the site. Since it is a heavily wooded site With thousands of trees and bushes, they didn't feel it necessary for such a small addition. He noted that there were half a dozen small shrubs and three trees that would come down as a result of the new addition. They don't have a formal landscape plan as yet but anticipate they will provide more than what is required in order to provide adequate screening for residential neighbors. Mr. Long said that if they are required to add parking, they would have to move some trees and that would also add to their cost for landscaping. Mr. Burgess noted that moving trees is not counted in the landscaping amount; it must be new landscaping. Mr. Burgess asked if there isn't a plan showing existing land- scaping. Mr. Long said they couldn't find it. What they did find didn't seem to correspond with some of what there. He noted that islands didn't seem to be the size they were on the plans. Mr. Weith said it is up to the applicant to provide an accurate J14" —_ �rrrE SEE NOTE 2 I I I I I I I � I I � I I I � I I 1 W lc \ I N v ui I I „ I I I I FAYETTECO, INC. I I I I VOL. 91 PG. 138 I j PLAN VOL. 365 PG. BS I I I I I JWJ REALTY, INC. VOL. 296 PG. 222-224 PLAN VOL. 80 PG, 155 32.41 ACRES SEE NOTE 5 I I I I } 30' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT- I - - -I VOL. 96 PC. 175 \\ I I I I I I I ; } EXIBTNQ BULDkJO I I I I I I I 10' WIDE ELECTRICAL EASEMENT I VOL_ 101 PG. 46 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I t I I I I I 200.00' /•�� — — —N 2Y4000 EE APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT ON THE DAY OF 19_, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 19_, BY , CHAIRPERSON. \ss \ FAYEI'TECO, INC. VOL. 91 PG. 138 20' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT �\ n \ PLAN VOL. J65 PG. �8!.5VOL. 96 PG. 185-6ss'OV 237 .71- _ _ T - 379711 -- — - - - -- J �� 3 �^In n v H e '^ I f MCLEAN HOLDINGI CO P10RATION VOL. 388 PG. 596 f2.93 ACRES SEE NOTE 5 / 20' WIDE ELECTRICAL EA' VOL. 335 PG. 433 z N 22'2445 E I I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CEMETERY k Vnl 11 rl. 118 / / 10' WIDE GAS EASEMENT // VOL. 329 PG. 474 rf/I //Ao ra/Nn (o/sniiveml/30 3 aio50' w 11 II II II I I II II II II u 1 I I I I I i US ROUTE 7 - SHEL.BURNE ROAD SEE NOTE 3 ORIGINAL BOUNOAOPY LINES TO BE O/SSIX LED LEGEND PROPERTY LINE — — — EASEMENT LINE e FENCE POST SET IN CONCRETE e IRON PIPE FOUND • 5/8' REBAR w/ SURVEY MARKER TO BE SET m TRANSFORMER — FENCE I CERTIFY MAT THIS RA7 WAS PREP, UNDER MY SUPERV" AND IS BASED ON RECORD RESEARCH, FIELD ENOENCE OMER PERRNEN7 WORMADON AND CONFORMS MIN THE REDUIREVENIS OF KSJL 27 SEC110N 1401 CIIARES R. DUN AM RLS 0210 80WHILAPA ENTERPSIMS. INC. VOL. 216 PG. 91 PLAN VOL. 386 PG. 101 NOTED I. The boundary survey was performed with a theodolite• electronic distance meter, and a steel tape. 2. The bearings are referenced to magnetic north with a delineation of +/- 15 degrees west. 3. U.S. Route 7 has a right of way of 99 feel determined by eAsling monumenlalio, and the traveled portion of the road. 4. The purpose of this Plat is to depict the boundary adjustment between the JWJ Realty, Inc. parcel and the McLean Holding Corporation parcel. 5. The acreage shown represents the boundary adjusted parcels. The original JWJ Really, Inc. parcel contains 4.77 acres. The original McLean Holding Corporation parcel contains .57 acres. 6. There are easements granted to the Slate of Vermont for installation and maintenance of three traffic loops at or near the left of their survey station 443+49 and to maintain povemenl morkings between their survey stations 443+41 and 443+57. Reference Vol. 217, pg. 70 and parcel 96 as shown on a plan entitled 'State of Vermont, Agency of Transportation. City of South Burlington, Project M5000(1), dated 11/30/83. 7. There Is o waterline eosement over the Fayetteco. Inc. parcel In favor of JWJ Realty, Inc. The specillc locotlen was not determined. Reference Vd. 328, D923J. 8. These parcels To in the Commercld 1 Zoning District. RECEIVED MAY 0 7 1997 City of So. Burlington GRAPHIC SCALE ss _ 1 I Inch - 'rl It LOT NO. 1 = 104,763 S.F. i I I \ � I I — I / / I I it South BurllnOton_ Chr slur Pl nouth -.._..- �....-.. .� , HYDRANT PAWCINU . FIRE. "J. I -�--r i I I I ��,•..i + 1 _- LPROPOSED ADDITION 11 - _ { I SATURN ' I1F --. ! SOLITM BURLINGTON /yr L'❑T NO. 2 127,566 S.F. { r V NEV DIKE I �` PACK i i-- � (" CUSTOMER PARKING -it t. g SCRUB 'rREE,s { i 0 S l rrT R, te CHAIN LINK FENCE «. r _ 4. swnsa...' '• ST. YWIIIOIO NEV LIGHTING, MATCH EXIST { EXISITNG CEMETERY zl"I I I I � } / M _� onrr ~ NEW STREET TrtESQ_ 12' MAPLE p ! EW SATURN SIGN {-3 ELM STREET SIGN 24MAPLE ELECT. POLE -- - II A-- - -___---- -� I�----------------------'---- -- ------SHELBURNE ROAD------- - --- I I >_ III`—i-K-=-==_____-_¢_-_-=-________ -----------�I------ -----—--- - — - - -- JWJ REALTY 1095 SHELBURNE RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SITE INF❑RMATI❑N LOT SIZE: 232,329 S.F. OR 5.8 ACRES BUILDING COVERAGE: EXISTING = 23,000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: 25,560 S.F,(2,560 S.F. ADD.) LANDSCAPED AREA: 69,930 S.F. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 162,399 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED: 11% TOTAL LOT COVERAGEt 69.9% (BLDG,PAVE,WALK S,ETC,) FRONT YARD COVERAGE: 12% BUILDING INF❑RMATION 1. NO NEW EMPLOYEES. 2. BUILDING COST, $100,000. 3, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, MATCH EXIST. PROPOSED PLANTINGS KEY NAME COMMENT NIZE IQUANT. COST 1 RED MAPLE (ACER RUBRUM) 'PADS 31tcl. 7 $300D WPRIP03ED PLANTING N PROPOSED LIGHTING FIXTURE. 2 1000V SKK ON IW ROUND STEEL PULE. FINISH TO MATCH EXIST. pp EXIST. LIGHTING TYP. 0 30 100 10 INO. ' DATI ' RN1910N ECrj V16t" AFAR 2 2 i9w City of So. Bur{in to �n Memorandum - Planning February 25, 1997 agenda items February 21, 1997 Page 7 --- provide existing and proposed exterior lighting details (cut - sheets) and show locations on the plan. --- show dumpster locations, all dumpsters should be screened and so noted on the plan. --- provide a perimeter survey of the entire property and show "parcel D" merged with the original lot. --- correct the note on the plan so that the Conservation and Open Space District is not shown as a setback. It is a zoning district. --- provide estimated cost of proposed buildings. --- the applicant should submit a written report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. --- the pedestrian path should be shown in its approved location (refer to map in volume 105, page 76 in the land records). 5) WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, SUBDIVISION & AUTO SALES & SERVICE ADDITION - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totaling 27,750 square feet. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the adjoining lot creating a 5.3 acre PUD, 2) creating two (2) lots within the PUD of 2.4 acres ( lot #1) and 2.9 acres ( lot #2) , and 3 ) constructing a 2560 square foot addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2. The ZBA on 3/10/97 will consider a request from the applicant for a use variance for the auto sales and service addition. This property located at 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road lies within the Cl District. It is bounded on the west by Fayette Road, on the south by L&M Park, on the east by Shelburne Road, and on the north by Hannaford Plaza and a cemetery. PUD "Notice of Condition": Even though two lots are being created, this development constitutes a PUD and therefore will be reviewed by the City as one lot for zoning and subdivision purposes. A "Notice of Condition" should be recorded which clearly identifies this entire development as a PUD and that it will be reviewed as one lot for zoning and subdivision purposes. The applicant has requested that the development not be treated as one lot for sign purposes so that they may erect a separate free standing sign on lot #2. Staff does not see a problem with this request since both 7 Memorandum - Planning February 25, 1997 agenda items February 21, 1997 Page 8 lots will meet the minimum frontage requirement for the district of 200 feet. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 38 foot signalized driveway on Shelburne Road. No changes proposed. The existing curb cut serving 1085 Shelburne Road will be eliminated. Circulation on the site will be adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Entire PUD (i.e., combined lots #1 and 2): Building coverage is 11% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 12.2% (maximum allowed is 30%). Lot #1: Building coverage is 13.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 64.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 17.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Lot #2: Building coverage is 9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 74.4% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 6.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). The Commission can waive the coverage for lot #2 since this lot is part of a PUD, and the coverage for the entire PUD is not being exceeded. The existing buildings and proposed addition will meet the setback requirements. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs is $3000, which is not being met. The revised final plat plan should include additional plantings to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. Parking: A total of 61 parking spaces are required for customers and employees and 64 spaces are provided including five (5) handicapped spaces. A bike rack will be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. Sewer: No additional allocation needed. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement of 40,000 square feet is being met. The minimum frontage requirement of 200 feet is being met. Sidewalk: A sidewalk is proposed along the property's frontage which does not currently have a sidewalk. 0 Memorandum - Planning February 25, 1997 agenda items February 21, 1997 Page 9 Traffic: This property is located in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate 174 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE estimates the current facility to generate 72.7 vte's and with the proposed addition to generate 77.9 vte's which is a 5.2 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee will be $0. Lighting: Additional exterior lighting will match existing lighting and will consist of: --- six (6) 1000 watt super metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on three (3) 24 foot high poles. The Performance Standards limit the height of pole lights to 20 feet. Proposed poles should be reduced in height to meet this requirement. The revised final plat should include a point by point lighting plan for the entire PUD which shows that the maximum illumination at ground level does not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Dumpsters: A screened dumpster storage area should be shown for the dumpsters on lot #1. The type of screening proposed for all dumpsters should be noted on the plan. Other: --- The site information on sheet S-1 should be revised to indicate the correct acreage (i.e. 5.3 acres). 6) BLS PROPERTIES - MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of constructing a 1200 square foot addition to an existing 44,703 square foot medical office building. This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 11/17/87 (minutes enclosed). The ZBA on February 24, 1997 will consider a request from the applicant for a conditional use permit. This property located at 52 Timber Lane lies within the R7 District. It is bounded on the north by Kennedy Drive, on the west by Timber Lane, on the south by a medical office building, and on the east by a contractor's yard and an elderly housing facility. Access/circulation: Access is provided by two (2) curb cuts on Timber Lane. The northerly curb cut is 30 feet wide and the southerly curb cut is 30 feet wide and the southerly curb cut is 20 M PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on May 27, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Revised final plat application of John Larkin to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of a 200 room hotel and restaurant, 1720 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of constructing a covered drop-off area for guests. 2) Revised final plat application of Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 27,750 square feet of automobile sales and service use in two (2) buildings, 1085, 1089 and 1095 Shelburne Road. The amendment consists of: 1) merging a 24,750 square foot lot into the adjoining lot creating a 5.3 acre PUD, 2) creating two (2) lots within the PUD of 2.4 acres and 2.9 acres, and 3) constructing a 2,560 square foot addition to the auto sales and service facility on proposed lot #2. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission May 10, 1997 M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair outh Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, May 27 1997 Agenda Items Date: May 9, 1997 WIEMANN - LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS - SUBDIVISION & AUTO SALES/SERVICE ADDITION - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- point by point lighting plan must include all building mounted lights. --- point by point by point lighting plan exceeds the maximum illumination at ground level allowed under the Performance Standards contained in the zoning regulations. The maximum illumination allowed is an average of three (3) foot candles. --- proposed light poles will exceed the 20 foot height limit contained in the Performance Standards. --- the lighting on the site is much too bright. The wattage of the existing and proposed lighting fixtures should be significantly reduced, 1000 watts is too much. The point by point lighting plan shows lighting levels of up to 18 foot candles on the north and west property lines. This is unacceptable. --- site plan should must show entire property. --- parking layout on landscape plan and site plan should be identical. --- all dumpsters on the property should be shown and should be screened. The type of screening should be noted on the plan. --- the site information on sheet L-1 should be revised to indicate the correct acreage (i.e. 5.3 acres). JOHN LARKIN - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- provide planting schedule for new landscaping. --- provide estimated building cost for the pavilion. --- provide bike rack as required under Section 26.10 of the zoning regulations. --- provide building, overall and front yard coverage information. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 15, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lampere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is a copy of the February 25, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely{ 1 "Ce' Joe Weith,/'y City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl 8 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7965 May 9, 1997 Timothy M. Eustace Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. P.O. Box 1507 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1507 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Notice of Conditions For J.W.J. Realty & Parking Management Plan For Dorset Land Company, Inc. Dear Tim: Enclosed is a copy of a proposed Notice of Conditions for a PUD consisting of a two (2) lot subdivision at 1095 Shelburne Road. Also, enclosed is a copy of the subdivision plat. This project is up for final approval on May 27, 1997. Even though this project hasn't been approved yet, I thought I'd give you a chance to review it and provide comments. Also enclosed is a 421 Dorset Street Parking Management Plan dated 4/28/97 with an attached map. This document supposedly has been approved by your office. Would you please verify this. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer'bly, r Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. and McLean folding corporation, �,lerinont corporations with their principal pla ms of business in South Burlington, Vermont ("Owners") are the owners of certain property consisting of 5.0 acres of land more or less presently owned by J.W.J. Realty, Inc, and .5 acres of Land more or less presently owned by McLean Holding Corporation, at 108.5, 1089 & 1095 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, the Owners obtained approval fran the South Burlington Planning Commission (the "Commission") on , 1997 for a planned unit deveLopmer_t (the 11Pvr}1) on a plat entitled Survey Plat, , So_ Burlington, T" , prepared by Civil Engineering Associates dated 1997, and recorded in the Map Boo< at Page at the south .Burlington hand Records (the "Prope_ty"); and WHEREAS, the. Commission's approval imposes certain conditions on the Property, NOW THEREFORE, Owners hereby give notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and he binding upon the land unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor; 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of th, approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission granted on and applicable prior approvals of the Commission. 2. Except as set forth herein, the Pra?erty is and shall constitute a single parceL of land for purposes of compliance with Cite of South Burlington regulations and ordinances now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning and subdivision regulations. Except as set forth herein, Ourners-ovenant and agree that for purposes of compliance with and application of City of South Burlington ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision re;ulations, the Property shall continue to be r=garded as a single parcel of land, even if th-a buildings 'Located on such property ire conveyed to separate owners togethe-- with the lots on which such buildings are lo:ated. 3. The Property shall be treated as tw) separate parcels of land for purposes of the City of South Burlington's sign Regulations now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted. 4. Any future application for an amendment or modification affecting one or more of the parcels comprising the PUD shall be deemed an amendment or modification to the PUD as a whole, and the Commission shall evaluate and render a decision in the context of the entire PUD, not merely on the impacts as they relatd to the parcel(s) for which the amendment or modification is specifically proposed. 5. Nothing in this Notice or the condition: or covenant contained herein shall be construed to prevent conveyance, lease, assignment, mort;age, or other transfer of any interest in and to any one of the subdivided parcels as separate and apart from the rest; of the parcels comprising the PUD. 6. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be aay owner of any parcel. The City shall act upon ana application submitted by an owner and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the owner.3 as to the respective rights of the owners. Ie shall be the duty of the owners to notify all others :laving an interest + in the property that may be affected by the application. proceedings of the commencement of :;uch proceedings. 7. Any action to enforce any City ordi,iance or regulation, including zoning and subdivision, o:- sign regulations, against the Property, or activities or events occurring on the Property, shall be brought atlainst the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners -,o notify all others having an interest in the Property _hat may be affected by the enforcement proceedings or the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in :in enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief of penalties, shall be enforceable against any owners made a party to such enfors:ellent proceeding. 8. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 9. This Notice of Conditions shall be Dinding upon the Owners and the owners' successor anc! assigns. 2 Dated this day of IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Witness STATE OF ii EP14ONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEV, SS. , 1997. J.W.J. REALTY, INC. By: Its Duly Authorized Agent MCLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION By: _ Its Duly Authorized Agent At. South Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this _ day of , 1997, personally appeared duly authorized agent for J.W.J. Realty, Inc., and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of J.W.J. Realty, Inc. STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY 01' CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this _ day of , 1997, personally appeared duly authorized agent for McLean Holding Corporation, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of McLean Holding Corporation. F:%WPD0CSISAV0IE\SI7EPLAN.APP 3 $eltl 'It 1)fl a. J-SCrc n4r,nanc,+nn" G r- • T, e o , , ^e; City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 9, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Archiects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, May 16, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: May 27, 1997 Agenda Items Date: May 9, 1997 J.W.J. REALTY INC. & MCLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION - SHELBURNE ROAD Site plans including boundary adjustment dated April 1997 prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere and Civil Engineering Associates is acceptable. HOLIDAY INN PAVILION - SHELBURNE ROAD The site plan showing the proposed pavilion prepared by Gregory Rabideau Architect dated 4/23/97 is acceptable. To: From: Re: Date: 1. M E M O R A N D U M Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner South Burlington Fire Department Plans Reviewed for May 27, 1997 agenda May 8, 1997 J.W.J. Realty 1095 Shelburne Road Acceptable 2. John Larkin 1720 Shelburne Road There should be a minimum 12 foot clearance under the pavilion Dated 4/22/97 Dated 4/24/97 ,— .7�k.r a-002- Q1 4 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, J.W.J. Realty, Inc_ and McLean Holding Corporation, Vermont corporations with their principal pla�es of business in South Burlington, Vermont ("Owners") are the owners of certain property consisting of 5.0 acres of land more or less presently owned by J.W.J. Realty, Inc. and .5 acres of land more or less Presently owned by McLean Holding Corporation, at 1085, 1o89 & 1095 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, the Owners obtained approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission (the "Commission") on 1997 for a planned unit development (the "PUD") on a plat entitled Survey Plat, So. Burlington, VT, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates dated 1997, and recorded in the Map Book at Page of the South Burlington Land Records (the "Property") and WHEREAS, the Commission's approval imposes certain conditions on the Property. NOW THEREFORE, Owners hereby give notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon the land unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor; 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission granted on Commission. _, and applicable prior approvals of the 2. The Property is and shall constitute a single parcel of land for purposes of compliance with City of South Burlington regulations and ordinances now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning, subdivision and sign regulations. owners covenant and agree that for purposes of compliance with and application of city of South Burlington ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, the Property shall continue to be regarded as a single parcel of land, even if the buildings located on such property are conveyed to separate owners together with the lots on which such buildings are located. 3. Any future application for an amendment or modification affecting one or more of the parcels comprising the PUD shall be deemed an amendment or modification to the PUD as a whole, and the Commission shall evaluateand ItLj I. " t. Y render a decision in the context of the merely on the impacts as they relata to for which the amendment or modification proposed. entire PUD, not the parcel(s) is specifically 4. Nothing in this Notice or the condition or covenant contained herein shall be construed to prevent conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer of any interest in and to any one of the subdivided parcels as separate and apart from the rest of the parcels comprising the PUD. 5. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be any owner of any parcel. The City shall act upon any application submitted by an owner and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the owners as to the respective rights of the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners to notify all others having an interest in the property that may be affected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 6. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning and subdivision, or sign regulations, against the Property, or activities or events occurring on the Property, shall be brought against the owners. It shall be the duty of the owners to notify all others having an interest in the Property that may be affected by the enforcement proceedings or the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief of penalties, shall be enforceable against any owners made a party to such enforcement proceeding. 7. This Notice. of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. EM Dated this This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the Owners and the Owners, successor and assigns. day of 2 1997_ IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. J.W.J. REALT , INC. By: Its D .1thorize Agent MOLE HOLD G CORPORATION By: Its y Aathorized Agent At south Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this day of 1997, personally appeared duly authorized agent for J.W.J. Realty, Inc., and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed Of J.W.J. Realty, Inc. STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS, At South Burlington, Vermont in said County and State, this ---- day of , 1997, personally appeared , duly authorized agent for McLean Holding Corporation, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and daed of McLean Holding Corporation. p:\t4PDOCS\FORK\CS\S:TrPLW ,APP 3 LOT NO, i = 104,763 S.F. II I� -, 7TT I I \ I I - I- I I 4 � I � f�. ~•ar — I - I I i� I 91 II South Bur zpt t 1 Chr slur Ptrwuth �I I �I I _ . I t nRins i — ��. FFM A • ` --LATE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT. i \ -+'� 1 O / EM�LO PAiifC[NG r fl i 7 '•ROPDSED !....� I .._.... . � wI1DiT lON I .� ATT N SOUTHSBLARLINGTON y� J 0� CUSTOMER PARKING T NO. 2 = 127,566 S.F. SCRUB TREE'S CHAIN LINK FENCE EXISITNG CFMC"TERY + 7 I to = "P-` w I / I 12' MAPLE IEW SATURN SIGN �' '--3' ELM 1'r STREET SIGN �r 24' MAPLE LECT. POLE — — NEW — — SIDEWALK — — -- — — — Ik----------------------------SHELBURNE T READ -----_---=--- n =___ -- -- - —--—---------------- ----- ----- JWJ REALTY r 1095 SHELBURNE RD. I SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT ( SITE INF❑RMATION I � LOT SIZE: 232,329 S,F, ❑R 5,8 ACRES BUILDING COVERAGE: EXISTING = 23,000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE: 25,560 S,F.(2,560 S.F. ADD.) LANDSCAPED AREA: 69,930 S.F. TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 162,399 S.F. i1 ul BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED: 11% ' % TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 69,9% CBLDG,PAVE,WALKS,ETCJ FRONT YARD COVERAGE: 12% BUILDING INF❑RMATI❑N 1. NO NEW EMPLOYEES, 2. BUILDING COST, $100,000, 3, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, MATCH EXIST. PROPOSED PLANTINGS KEY NAME COMMENT MIZE GUANT. COST 1 RED MAPLE LACER RUBRUM> MADE 3'cal. 7 300 0 PROPOSED PLANTING N PROPOSED LIGHTING FIXTURE. 2 1000V SM.H ON 18' ROUND STEEL POLE. FINISH TO MATCH EXIST. o•o EXIST. LIGHTING TYP, RECEIVFIF-' City of So. Burlington 50 100 10 �No. � nA-rz (aveuoN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 2 ) Name of Subdivision JWJ Realty 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application Surveyor & Engineer - Civil Engineering Associates Shelburne, Vermont (802) 985 2323 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Parking Lot - Spring '97 Addition - 1998 or 1999 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c,,QQntaining all information required under Section 202.1 o`f the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulatio for a inor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a 'or s vision. (Signat e)-;6p ica or contact person D to 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record JWJ Realty, 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Tele: (802) 658 2300 b . Applicant Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, INc. 30 South Park Drive, Colchester. VT 05446 c . Contact Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. Gary Lavigne (802) 655 5020 Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Planned unit development - subdivided into two parcels for future sale, the addition of a sign, an addition to the Saturn facility and site modifications. Applicant's legal }n exest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. IN U Ownership of 1295 Shelburne Road and aiA pption .'�)yi 10815 Shelburn8 Road Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties McLean Corp., City of So. Burlington, James Fayette, et. al., and Burlington Mall, INc. Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. see Site Plan 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. existing 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (81 x 11, 8} x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential develo ent. (SignaturO applic t or contact person Date LOT NO. 1 = 104,763 S.F. 1 JAI Sou tft Burl lnyton Chr •Irr PI IlwutA to h L1e ' i msr /- cmr were SITE PLAN \e1 tF- -r S J Mki 01 $*TURN Of SOUTH OLMLINCTON O NEW 7 a SAn" slur, //—�SIREET SIGN SCRU6 TREES UNK FENCE EX19rTNG CEMETERY tz MAPLE \--� ELM -4— 24' MAPLE T1 i i. I • • •. -� pop z r C •I YI I;, •I I •• c I.' rc -•.I •.r •I � c r Z2 � esm 1 6 1.997 City of So. Burlington DATE IZEYIfiICN MWPOSM WE PLAN J w J REALTY eoUrH BUCLNOTOK von.,orrr VEWM - LAMM1 M ARDVWM W- JO OWfH r*IA DWE CQCHMTEK 15,111W SCALE r-5a-0- DICAVAt9 WL DATE aemm rr O0. rpuxw. T QW47 g7tAilrOMdWlNMIlQ2 A1Clr1� rG CARD rrAECT WM.'E 90047 47.,rsq City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 21, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 25, 1997, at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S cerely, Jo Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls LOT NO. 1 = 104,763 S.F. \ LOT NO. 2 = 127.566 S.F. � w I � L FEB o 7 1997 City of So. Burlington TREES _ ❑ W • . c r c ♦I C .:II c•� �. •I• .•"•sir r c ♦I Z- r ;• :I r= �r - sv• r c -I -. • I C 11" :rII III 1 II -: I ♦ >1: "tram nmem My RMIE ML64mme>a "m coer t Im umm om BOON SPAM S 5 117VWW UO 1� III L CN z,Na 2WNO" VM ro uAroN oalr. » Vw. M011ro M. CHAIN LINK FENCE SMI OR O/i0NF P G10 EX15ITNO CEMETERY WIE m Pat Ir x w almm o» eo 100 F- FMl191LD sRAot OR >v NO. DATE. Irtv1610F1 11 j1 . I P�VflIDIi SURFACE Ir MAPLE 111-PRO9080 811E PLAN II II r-11'%J/1'f —3' ELM to eAR Di FGoo.. wsE -,~ WCHOR WS J w J REALTY 24i MAPLE CAOVMMD —� ___---- SOLMH BLRLINOTOR VEFX40W COKCMN SOL /0 PVC FROM Pat N W w/4PNUff WE,,-,-1 L AIAFH J//C X 1G 0. I GROIIRO / n �+� �+�•'+ � GAaMO Rat 30 ea" rARK CRNE OCA" CALYANVFD Si0 PYT yL vAnROIR T—_ I cCOMMmMRmECTa1L POLE BASE DETAIL RTs 1�7 CEID L 119f 7 3 No Text Preliminary February 11, February 5, Page 2 --- submit maximum average Comments - Planning 1997 agenda 1997 a point by point lighting plan which shows that the illumination at ground level does not exceed an of three (3) foot candles. GREEN TREE PARK, INC. - WAREHOUSE - SITE PLAN --- provide gross floor area devoted to office space, number of non -office employees and number of company vehicles operating from the premises (for parking calculation). --- provide front yard coverage information --- plan should include street address: 6 Green Tree Drive. --- provide details (cut -sheets) for any building mounted exterior lights. --- the dumpster should be screened from the adjoining property to the north. --- the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $1800. --- staff recommends that the Maple trees be increased in size to a minimum of 2J inch caliper. VEVE ASSOCIATES - ADD 4 DWELLING UNITS - SKETCH PLAN --- lot size on plan used for post -development lot coverage is 15.3 acres. Plan indicates that lot D is 0.6 acres and the lot at 435 Dorset Street is 14.93 acres which totals 15.53 acres. Which is correct? --- if the 15.53 acre lot size is correct, then 108 units are allowed and 109 units are proposed. --- 246 spaces are required and 198 spaces are available. This is a 48 space or 19.5% shortfall. Revised final plat: The final plat plans should conform in all respects to the information requirements under Section 203.1 and 204.1 of the subdivision regulations in addition to the following: --- show all existing and proposed landscaping. The proposed landscaping should meet the minimum requirement required under Section 26.105(a) of the zoning regulations. --- provide existing and proposed exterior lighting details (cut - sheets) and show locations. --- all dumpsters should be screened and so noted on the plan. M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Fles From: Raymond J. Belair, South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, February 25, 1997 Agenda Items Date: February 5, 1997 WI EMANN- LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. - SUBDIVISION & AUTO SALES & SERVICE ADDITION - SKETCH PLAN The sketch plan should be revised to include the following additional information: --- address of owner names of owners of contiguous properties - graphic scale --- type of, location, and size of existing and proposed utilities. --- location map --- property boundary distances. Other comments: -- the Saturn dealership is a nonconforming use in the Cl District, Section 26.003 of the zoning regulations prohibits the expansion of a nonconforming use. - provide building, overall and front yard coverage information for each lot. - — indicate all spaces devoted to employee and customer parking. - indicate number of new employees, if any. --- indicate cost and type of construction of proposed addition. Revised Final Plat: - -- the revised final plat should include a survey of the property and include all the information required under Sections 203.1 i and 204.1 of the subdivision regulations. --- provide a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- provide landscaping plan showing existing and proposed landscaping. --- a sidewalk should be constructed along the applicant's street frontage which currently does not have a sidewalk. --- a legal document should be submitted for recording which indicates that for zoning and planning purposes, both lots will be treated as one (1) lot. --- existing and proposed exterior lighting information. No Text 67" 64, f. lee 49.�o Lot 1 Lot Size: Total Lot Coverage: % total Lot Coverage: Lot 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN jWj REALTY PROJECT #96047 FEBRUARY 6, 1997 104,763 sq. ft. 67,531 sq. ft. 64 % Lot Size: 127,566 sq. ft. Total Lot Coverage: 94,868 sq. ft. % Total Lot Coverage: 74 % Total Lot Size (A & B): 232,329 sq. ft. Total Lot Coverage (A & B): 162,399 sq. ft. % Total Lot Coverage: 69.9 % Lot 1 Front Yar Coverage Front Yard Lot Size: 10,101 Front Yard Coverage: 1,808 sq. ft. % Front Yard Coverage: 18 % Lot 2 Front Yard Coverage Front Yard Size: 9,914 sq. ft. Front Yard Coverage: 642 sq. ft. % Front Yard Coverage: 6 % City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 5, 1997 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Inc. 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 2 Lot Subdivision & Saturn Addition, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, February 14, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si nrerely, Lymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: February 25, 1997 Agenda Items Date: January 30, 1997 DORSET COMMONS APARTMENTS - DORSET STREET Site plan dated 10/14/94 prepared by Vermex Design is acceptable. J.W.J. REALTY - SHELBURNE ROAD The cemetery is surrounded by a chain link fence installed by the City several years ago. This fence is the property line. Plans shows this fence about 5 feet into the lot being developed. OLD STONE HOUSE FARM - VAN SICKLEN ROAD - (MULTI -FAMILY PROJECT 1. Sidewalks should be included. 2. The future road to the Auclair property to the south should have a simple curve not a reverse curve. 3. Water demand for fire protection is greater for multi -family structures than for single family. This should be checked to see if it is adequate. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Review for February 25, 1997 Date: February 3, 1997 1. J.W.J. Realty Dated 1/16/97 1095 Shelburne Road The Fire Department is concerned with the close proximity of the hydrant to the proposed addition. If possible, this hydrant should be moved further from the building. 2. Veve Associates Dated 1/28/97 435 Dorset Street Acceptable 3. BLS Properties Dated 1/31/97 52 Timber Lane Acceptable Bill Savoie JWJ Realty 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 May 19, 1996 Ray Belair City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Ray: Thank you for your recent note concerning lighting and the trash situation. We are a concerned and confused on both. One set of lights on the building was rearranged on the building in 1992 when the lot was configured for Saturn. We have done nothing since then. I stood outside last night to see which light might be bothering our neighbors and could find none shining on their property. If someone could meet me here and point out which one is of concern we would be happy to correct it. The concern of trash is even more confusing. Much of the litter caused by the construction of McDonalds, Discovery Zone et al still sits between the property. Many of the tree debris still exists as well as miscellaneous debris including food litter. We believe most of it comes from thW McDonalds or Cactus Pete Restaurants. The recent addition of a fence may help stop the trash pollution. However, we will also go through the area and clean it up. We know our employees travel through there to go to the restaurants. However, we will keep you posted as to if it is our litter or there's. We NEVER had a problem before they moved in. I would like to close off the travel by our employees over the stream. I had thought that the sidewalk would be completed by now. There remains a gap between Vermont National and our lot. I believe it is on their side of the property line. Is it possible someone could look into this. If I need to call back our contractor for missing this I will, but I do believe it should have been part of the McDonalds construction. This has been a bigger problem in the winter as the sidewalk plow does not even clear the sidewalk on our property since it is not connected. I will be out of town all of Tuesday, Wednesday, and part of Thursday this week. Please contact my brother Jeff on the lights at 658-2300, to arrange a convenient time to meet. Thanks again for your input. We both agree the improvements are worthy of our joint attention. Regards, ZLavoie City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 16, 1996 William Savoie J.W.J. Realty, Inc. 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Exterior Lighting Dear Mr. Savoie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 It has come to our attention that since the July 28, 1992 final plat approval for the Saturn building, you have replaced the building mounted lights on the South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth building. Condition #5 of this approval requried that any new lighting be downcasting and shielded and not cast light beyond the property line. These new lights do cast light beyond the property line. Please make adjustments to these lights so that they are downcasting and do not cast light beyond your property line. In another matter, we received a complaint that garbage/trash was blowing out of your dumpsters and landing in the adjacent ravine. I went to the area and found that there was some trash in the ravine but that it was not in a significant amount. I simply wanted to bring this complaint to your attention. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, t Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp ,ram State of Vermont + r ��„3i�:Uy • WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Case #: WW-4-0522-1 Environmental Protection Rules PIN #: EJ95-0119 Effective September 10, 1982 Applicant: JWJ Realty Address: 1089 Shelburne Rd. So. Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of connecting floor drains of an existing car dealership building (South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth with a maximum of 36 employee's), to the municipal sewer, an increase of a maximum of 25 gallons per day wastewater over existing flows, located at 1095 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL 1. This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106 or 658-2199), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. 2. No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. 3. A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. 4. In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. I Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0522-1 Page 2 5. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. 6. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. WATER 7. The project is approved for water supply by the municipal water system. SEWER 8. The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 25 additional gallons of sewage per day over existing flows. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont this 19th day of October, 1995. William C. Brierley, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By: XI Wjilliam E. Zabiloski Assistant Regional Engineer c For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington Selectboard Water Supply Division Department of Labor and Industry Wiemann - Lamphere Architects, Gary Lavigne T } State of Vermont f` a x Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council RELAY SERVICE FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 1-800-253-0191 TDD>Voice 1-800-253-0195 Voice>TDD October 4, 1995 JWJ Realty 1089 Shelburne Road So. Burlington VT 05403 > j AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Essex Junction Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 (802) 879-6563 WW-4-0522-1, South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth -- connect floor drains to municipal sewer in a previously Re: approved auto dealership; known as South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth; increase of 25 gpd located on Route #7/Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on September 26, 1995, including a fee of $100.00 paid by check number 1186. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 30 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we need further information from you in order to reach a decision on your application, the time we wait for your submittal of that information does not count against the allowable in-house time specified in the performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the permitted time of 30 days in-house, please contact this office at (802) 879-6563. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs, If you have not already done so, you also should check with town officials regarding any local requirements you may need to meet. For the Division of Wastewater Management Irene L. Roberge Administrative Secretary cc: South Burlington Planning Corrunission South Burlington Selectboard Chlorine Free 100% Recycled Paper Wiemarm-Lamphere Regional Office - Barre/Essex Jct./Pittstord/N. Springfield/St. Johnsbury o INC. o\.\ 36" CMP INV.=180.63 1 I 1V y: W o: ' Oin N I ) �1 Ser e , T ONC. FUEL PAD-- DRAINAGE EASEMENT 30,1 6" F ATION l - 194 - i DRAIN INV. 18"T !` I OVERHEAD 0 OIL INTERCEPTER- i 1 j I FLOOR ELEV. 194.52 i 1, South Burlington 1 I I Chrysler Plymouth 1 I REMOVE EXIST. CB 8 PLUG --� f j i i 4" C.I. DRAINAGE LINE 1 REMOVE IAS- D( NEW C8 LOOR ELEV. F RrER RIM-194,1I INV=190.1rVERHEAD 94.47 i 194.4 ! ' i NEW CONCRETE 10' GMP ELECTRICAL—� I :� RETAINING WALL T. O98 EASEMENT I j ` I I I 1 CONCRETE PAVERS 1 1 1 f1 I I DOUBLE DOOR-� FLOOR 1 i j 14" A PLE ELEV. 198.59 �Ol7ORETE WALK PAVER BIRCHESyp I j0 ,ti RETAIN EXISTING PAVEMENT I LOOP DETECTORS I + \ I V., 30" CONC. C VER 9516 UK yp 6ispicy-- FLAG - O I moo\ \ \ 11 Q POLE CONE . PAB "7LEC 0 J � N 18?-14'-41 _f_ --- ®- G N E W 25 . -- - 202-- MATCH EXIST. CURBING SS 5S _ SS STOPLIGHT BM ON TOP OF WEST BOLT ELEV. 203.25 =1 ST RIM=196.4 INV=189.8/ PAVING L;.MIT ;ijBI z I vv \ ; IV DIA 1IN i 50'R ' 5 20'R \�a 3 cR RIM=i9.3 INVzI87.8 (N � I DRAIN _ 2.5% 0 ;7T. 196 O.W. = 19 .0 1 0 .1970 lc U3 - BRIM=199. � 1 =189. SID WALK R I AaT_\_Tx�ll 10'R SIDEWALK RAMP 5'R C� 43 - -- used 21 :!CURB - OPENING-- --- �2p0 bI _ 3,,,_MAPLE \� RELOCATE SIGN - 8 PLANTER IDEwAI.K — — (NEW) MATCH EXISTII ss SEWED RIM=2C y� SHELBURNE R PLANNER 658-7955 Irene Roberge Agency of Natural 111 West Street City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 Resources September 25, 1995 Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Re: Sewer Allocation, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Ms. Roberge: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the City of South Burlington allocates 25 gpd of additional allocation due to the relocation of a floor drain at South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth at 1095 Shelburne Road. This property is served by the Bartlett Bay Treatment facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, JW/mcp cc: Gary Lavigne please give me a call. S nce ely, Weith, ty Planner PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 November 19, 1993 SECOND NOTICE William Savoie Saturn of South Burlington 1089 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Sign Ordinance Violation,"Saturn" Sign Dear Mr. Savoie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that you are in violation of Section 5, Permits Required of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. Your violation consists of erecting a free-standing "Saturn" sign without a sign permit. You should be aware that Section 8, Free Standing Signs allows only one (1) free-standing sign per lot. Since you already have a free- standing sign on the lot, a sign permit could not be issued for the second sign. Therefore, pursuant to Section 30, Penalties of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance, you have seven (7) days in which to remove this sign or face legal action and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. You may bring this sign into compliance by substituting the word "Saturn" with one of the words from the enclosed sign legend you submitted with your sign permit application. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward Certified letter #P 280 218 975 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 29, 1994 Mr. William Savoie Saturn of Vermont 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Letter of Credit #92-1768, Expiration Dear Mr. Savoie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to follow-up my letter to you dated February 23, 1994 in regards to the above referenced matter. Since you have not renewed your letter of credit, I must notify you that you are in violation of Section 204 of the South Burlington Subdivision Regulations. Your violation consists of not maintaining a landscape bond for a three (3) year period. Unless this violation is corrected within seven (7) days, the City will have no choice but to take legal action. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Since` ly, off D Fr Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Richard Ward Certified letter #P 280 218 980 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658.7955 February 23, 1994 Mr. William Savoie Saturn of Vermont 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Letter of Credit #92-1768, Expiration Dear Mr. Savoie: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to bring to your attention the fact that the Letter of Credit #92-1768 (copy enclosed) expired on January 31, 1993. This Letter of Credit was for landscaping at the new Saturn dealership. The Planning Commission's approval required that this Letter of Credit be in effect for a period of three (3) years. The permit for the Saturn building was issued on July 29, 1992 so the three (3) year period would expire on July 29, 1995. Therefore, please present the city with a new Letter of Credit with an expiration date of July 29, 1995. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, i RaymonA J. Belair Planning and Zoning Assistant RJB/peh PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 December 8, 1989 Mr. Jeff Savoie South Burlington Chrysler -Plymouth, Inc. 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Jeff: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter will confirm our conversation regarding the dumping of fill to the rear of your property at 1095 Shelburne Road. The City Planner, Joe Weith observed that the fill was dumped over a sewer line easement and within a conservation - open space area. (An area fifty (50) feet from the centerline of a stream or drainage way). I understand that you have no intention of continuing to fill and that the fill material dumped was from your recent parking lot resurfacing project. This being the case the City will require that the fill be removed from the two areas in question and that this office be notified upon completion in order that we may inspect the area of concern. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 t City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 March 19, 1993 Thomas F. Heilmann, Esquire P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sign Application, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. - Saturn of Vermont, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Heilmann: Enclosed please find a copy of the February 9, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Joe Weith, ' � City Planner Encls JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 9 February 1993, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: Mary -Barbara Maher, Acting Chair; Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan, Mac Teeson, Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Sandy Greiner, Free Press; Dick Ward, Zoning Administrator; Bill Cimonetti, City Council; Tom Heilman, Bill Savoie, Jeff Savoie, Sharon Savoie, Robert Milot, Todd Mobley, Rebecca & A.T. Simonski, Chip Kaupp, Gary Duguay, Alain English, Anne Ratkus, George Sporzynski, David LaRose, A.E. Boyd, Lou Bresee, Gerry Milot, Lance Llewellyn, Len Duffy, Jeff Noyes, Eric Fleg- genheimer, A. Bartlett, John Larkin, John Steele, Bill Gilbert 1. Other Business: a. Mr. Weith noted the city has gotten the Act 250 permit for the new city park, Phase I. A committee is being formed to meet with the engineers. A Planning Commission member is needed for the Committee. Mrs. Maher volunteered. 2. Minutes of 29 December and 12 January: Ms. Peacock moved the Minutes of 29 December 1992 be approved as written. Mr. Teeson seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Austin moved the Minutes of 12 January 1993 be approved as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Appeal by J.W.J. Realty, Inc., of decision by the Zoning Ad- ministrator denying applicant's request to install two free- standing pylon signs at 1095 Shelburne Rd." Mr. Ward explained that the Ordinance says no one property may have more than one free-standing sign. He, therefore, denied the application. He said the argument presented to him was that a property with multi -users allows the Planning Commission to make variances; however, this applies only in the Central District or where there isfrontage on two streets. The other argument is that two 40 sq. ft. signs would replace the present 80 sq. ft. sign. This is also not allowed in the Ordinance. The 80 ft. sign is grandfathered. Mrs. Maher asked if the applicant could have the names of both businesses on the one 80 ft. sign. Mr. Ward said they could but this would cause them an internal problem. He noted that Saturn now has a sign on their building. PLANNING COMMISSION 9 February 1993 page 2 Mr. Ward noted the Planning Commission has no authority to make a variance. Mr. Weith said the appeal is solely for an interpretaion of the ordinance. The Commission has to determing whether the Zoning Administrator has interpreted the Ordinance correctly. Mr. Heilman said they are not appealing the Zoning Administra- tor's interpretation. They want to draw attention to "unusual or special circumstances" (Sec. 23c). Mr. Weith acknowledged that this section is not clearly written. The original draft of this makes it clear that this section applies only to Dorset St. Mr. Heilman showed a picture of the sign which, he said, would be only 30 sq. ft. He noted there is now a problem with customers finding the Saturn location. He stressed there would be less total square footage and the sign would be less bright. Mr. Savoie echoed what Mr. Heilman said. Saturn is trying to make the sign more tasteful and smaller. Mrs. Maher agreed the sign is attractive, but said that her reading of the intent is the same as the Zoning Administrator's and Planner's. She suggested the applicant may have to go to the City Council. Other members agreed the Commission does not have the power to act in this instance. Mrs. Maher asked the Planner_to draft a motion with input from the City Attorney. She also suggested Section 23b be written more clearly. Mr. Austin moved to continue the a eal until 16 February 1993. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continue Site Plan application of Bruce Barry and David LaRose for use of a vacant 17,200 sq. ft. building for automobile repair and sales, 1907 Williston Rd.: Mrs. Maher noted the application was continued to let the appli- cant revise the plan to remove one curb cut on Williston Road. Mr. LaRose said the plan has been revised as requested. He asked that they not be required to stripe the parking lot until the area is retarred. Members agreed to allow them until 1 November 1993 to stripe the lot. Mr. Austin moved the Planijipa. Commission a rove the site lan ap lication of Bruce Barry and David LaRose for use of a vacant 200 s ft. building for automobile re air and sales as de- cted on a two _page_ set of lags a e one entitled "Pro osed to Plan, Barrv's Transmission, 1907 Williston Road, South City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 5, 1993 Mr. Thomas Heilmann Heilmann, Ekman & Associates, Inc. 35 King Street P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 Re: Sign Application, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. Dear Tom: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I received your letter dated March 3, 1993 regarding the above referenced sign application. In regards to your first question, Attorney Steven Stitzel prepared the Notice of Decision. Therefore, I think it is fair to assume that his opinion is contained within the Notice of Decision. In regards to your second question, the purpose of meeting with the City Council would be to discuss potential amendments to the City - sign ordinance. Such amendments would be necessary in order to allow your client to install two freestanding signs as proposed. You will need to contact City Manager, Charles Hafter, to arrange a meeting with the Council. Mr. Hafter can be reached at 658-7953. i cerely, 2 1 oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp cc: Chuck Hafter Dick Ward Steven Stitzel LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 I HOMAS F. HEILMANN CI IRISTOPHER D_ EKMAN MARY J_ SIGLER ARIHUR SCOT-f BARRLI"I JR I ODD D. SCHLOSSBURG March 3, 1993 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 TELEPHONE (60P) 86+,1'.,'V) LAX » (Wl) 86 4-4G 9 RE: Sign Application, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. - Saturn of Vermont 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Joe: I was surprised to receive the Planning Commission's Decision. I understand their vote, but I thought that the sentiment that there was going to be a recommendation that the matter be referred to the South Burlington City Council for review and consideration. I also understood that at least one of the Planning Commission members wanted to make sure from Attorney Steven Stitzel that the Planning Commission's result was correct. Accordingly, my questions are as follows: (a) Has Attorney Stitzel rendered an opinion relative to this matter and, if so, may we receive his assessment? (b) We would like to pursue this with the South Burlington City Council and, accordingly, would appreciate it if you would make this request known to the City Council so that we may get on their agenda. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann, TFH:lkm cc: William Savoie iWj ..�...+.r......+..vr,+,w.. �.. .. _ ....Y..,.,...�,�..,,.,,... _ .. , ,. .. ..„.....m..,......w.u�a.�uuu.��uuuiuu�a.tu.:rwr..�+........,.........,...... --...._...ww:�..:..wa.....:.::�w.,�...,.....,. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 � 658-7958 February 10, 1993 Diane Kenney, Esquire Stitzel & Page 171 Battery Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Saturn Sign Appeal, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Diane: Enclosed is the information from staff regarding the above referenced sign appeal. Basically, the Planning Commission agreed with staff's interpretation that Section 23 of the sign regulations does not apply to this property, and therefore the Commission does not have authority to approve the applicant's request for two (2) freestanding signs. As we discussed on the telephone, I will need for next Tuesday's meeting a "Findings of Fact and Decision" denying the appeal, Perely, Ua-01 oeWeith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION( The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Preliminary Plat application of Larkin-Milot Partnership for a planned residential development consisting of 73 single-family lots on 66.7 acres of land located on the east side of Spear Street opposite Deerfield Drive. 2) Appeal by J.W.J. Realty, Inc. of decision by the South Burlington Zoning Administrator denying applicant's request to install two (2) freestanding pylon signs at 1095 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission January 30, 1993 rh�K— i e — so 1 r1l0N a, a _ i OLD RAILROAD STATION • BOX 99 • NEW HAVEN VERMONT 05472 • 802-453-4440 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: Charles Hafter City Manager South Burlington, VT TELECOPIER #: 1-658-4748 Chuck - OUR FAX NUMBER: 802-453-2772 DATE: March 18,1991 TOTAL PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PACE): 8 Here's the Ordinance- it will need some fine tuning and careful revicw..... there may be a few points for refinement and certainly a number of points for more detailed discussion. Two items that will need to accompany this document are: 1) A map that shows the Overlay District Boundaries (or just added to existing Zoning Map or both) 2) A separate sheet or two that gives some more design guidelines in graphic form .... it could include a table with signs size requirements listed for ease of use by an applicant. T also believe that the existing ordinance may need some refinement, and we can discuss this later. Hope this is in the spirit and intent of the District ! I assume I will revecive any and all feedback, and will be happy to meet with you and others involved to finish this effort in atimely fashion. Thanks for your patience COPIES TO: SIGNED: David Raphael ge-l' PLEASE N01'IX'Y US AT 802-453-4440 IF ANY PAGES ARE NOT RECENED PROPERLY. THANK YOU f? 1 DRAFT0 f - S IS /C1 l City of South Burlington/Dorset Street/ ty Center "Overlay" Sign District Ordinance g This ordinace shall hereafter be known as and cited as "The Dorset Stieet(City Center Sign Ordinance". In addition to those purposes stated in the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance", it is intended that this Ordinance regulate signs in the specific district referred to as the Dorset Street/City Center Overlay Sign District. It is intended that this Ordinance reflect the distinct land and building uses within this district of the City and regulate signs so as to ensure their consistency and conformity with the stated purposes and characteristics of this district. This ordinance is to also reflect the longer term goals of the City to develop Dorset Street and the City Center area as an attractive nixed- use, well - designed, integrated focal point for the City. The area is to be a primarily residential, office, retail and municipal core for South Burlington. Furthemore, thepurpose of this Ordinance is to pronotc the stated pedestrian orientation for the future of the district as well as to ensure pedestrian and traffic safety, to encourage the effectiveness and clarity of sign communication and to maintain and enhance the aesthetic quality within the district. This sign ordinance is adopted under the zoning authority of the City in furtherance of the more general purposes set forth in the zoning ordinance. This ordinance in no way supercedes or replaces the duly adopted "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". It is intended that this Ordinance supplement the Existing Ordinance and is applicable only to the geographic district herein referred to and defined as the Dorset Street/City Center "Overlay" Sign District and as shown on the map which is par, of this ordinance. Within this special district it is intended that any sign design, cons7uction and placement which is not referred to or specified in this Ordinance be subject to the applicable regulation as contained in the city-wide "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". Where this ordinance and the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance" conflict the provisions of "The Dorset Street/City Center Sign Ordinance" shall override. Refer to Section 3 of the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance" for definitions of words and phrases used in this ordinance which are also contained in the "Sonth Burlington Sign Ordinance. Additional definitions are as follow: (1) "Directory Sign" as used in this Ordinance shall mean a freestanding sign erected at an entrance to one property or multiple properties served by a common curb -cut and listing those businesses, organizations or entices at that location. (2)'7emporary Sign" as used in this ordinance refers to any sign for a limited period of time for advertising or informational purposes supplementary to or replacing existing permanent signboards. The temporary sign reference in this ordinance does rot refer to signs in retail store R . 0 3 -zy windows, which are covered in the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". (3) "Marquees, canopies or awnings" as used in this ordinance refer to building mounted fabric and frame constructions or freestanding fabric (or other similar material) and frame that is attached to a building and used for seasonal and/or advertising purposes that do or do not contain graphics or sign information for a particular establishment. (4) "Incidental sign" a sign, generally informational, that has a Durpose secondary to the use of the Iot on which it is located, such as "no parking" "loading similar directives. No sign with a commercial message legible from a position of the lot on which the sign is located shall be considered incidental, nor shall traffic warning signs such as "Stop" or "Right Turn Only" or entrance signs such as "enter" or "exit" be considered incidental. It sliall be unlawful for any person, property owner or business to erect, alter,or relocate within this sign district of the City of South Burlington, any s- this ordinance or the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance", within, fir„i or temporary orti gsign, aspde�nt d by from the Code Officer, in accordance with all the provisions of t!nis ordinance and the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". The provisions of this section are as specified in Section 5(a through i) of the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance" with the exception of the follo-Xing additional provision: 0.) Signs which are applicable to appropriate for a Master Signage Plan or Common Signage Plan shall adhere to the provisions in this Ordinance for sarne. No permit shall be issued for an individual sign rewiring a p rmit unless and until a Master Signage Plan or a Common Signage Plan for the lot on which the sign(s) will be erected has been submitted to the Code Officer and approved as confonrtaing with the provisions of this ordinance. Those conditions which require a Master Signage Plan or a Common Signage Plan are as follows: (a). For any lot on which the owner proposes to erect on: or more signs requiring a permit, unless such lot is included in a Common Signage Plan, the owner shall submit to the Code Officer a Master Signage PIan containing the following: An accurate plot plan of the lot, at such scale as the Officer may reasonably require; Location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas on such lot; Computation of the maximum total sign area, the maxilMm area for individual signs, the height of signs and number of free-standing signs allowed on the lots included in the plan under this ordinance; and MFaFt— 1 cS-9 1 r-10N 11 7 1 F— - C_, -4 -3- An accurate indication on the plot plan of the proposed location of each present and future sign of any type, whether requiring a permit or not, except that incidental signs need not be shown, (b). If the owners of two or more contiguous (d.isegarding intervening streets or alleys) lots or the owner of a single lot with more than one building (not including any accessory building) file with the Code Officer for such lot(s) a Common Signage Plan conforming with the provisions of this section, a maximum 20% increase in the maximum total sign area shall be allowed for each included lot. This bonus shall be allocated within each zone lot as the owner or designated representative elects. (c) Provisions of a Common Signage Plan, The Common Signage Plan shall contain all of the information required for a Master Signage Plan and shall also specify standards for consistency among all signs on the lots affected by the plan with regard to: Color scheme; Lettering or Graphic Style; Lighting; Location of each sign on the buildings; Material and Sign Proportions. (d) Limit on the Number of Freestanding Signs Under Common Signage PIan The Common Signage Plan, for all lots with multiple uses or multiple users, shall limit the number of freestanding signs to a total of one for each street on which the zone lots included in the plan have frontage and shall provide for shared or common usage of such signs. (e) Other Provisions of Master or Common Signage Plans The Master or Common Signage Plan may contain such other restrictions as the owners of the lots may reasonably determine. (f) Consent. The Master or Common Signage Plan shall be signed by all owners or their authorized agents in such form as the Code Officer may require. (g) Procedures. A Master or Common Signage Plan shall be included in any development plan, site plan, planned unit development plan, or other official plan required by the city for the proposed development and shall be processed simultaneously with such other plan. (h) Amendment, f'1 U fY 1 -4- A Master or Common Signage Plan may be amended by filing a new Master or Common Signage Plan that conforms to all requirements of the Ordinance then in effect, (i) Existing Signs Not Conforming to Compton Signage Plan. If any new or amended Common Signage Plan is filed for a property on which existing signs are located, it shall include a schedule for bringing into conformance, within 2 years, all signs not conforming to the proposed amended plar, or to the requirements of this ordinance in effect on the date of the submission. 0) Binding Effect After approval of a Master or Common. Signage plan, no sign shall be erected, placed, painted or maintained except in conformance with such plan, and such plan may be enforced in the same way as any provision of this ordinance. In case of any conflict between the provisions of such a plan and any other provisions of this ordinance, the ordinance shall control. Permit fees applicable under the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance" are in effect for this ordinance as well and in accordance with the schedule of fees Rs adopted by the City Council. The only additional fees are for Temporary Signs as defined under the Dorset Street/City Center Overlay District Ordinance. Those fees will aslo be paid in accordance with the Schedule of Fees as adopted by the City Council. Signs shall be limited to advertising and information p�eertaining only to the lot or premises on which they are located, or if they are part of a Master or Common Signage Plan as described in this ordinance. Any sign not expressly permitted by the provisions of this ordinance and the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". (a) Freestanding SSig,05 - Freestanding signs are permitted only in accordance with this ordinance and following provisions; (a) 1. All freestanding signs are to be designed and constructed of suitable materials and erected and located in a manner which reinforces and respects the overall stated goals of this Sign District Ordinance. (a) 2, All freestanding signs and the premises surrounding same shall be maintained by the owner or designated representative thereof in a clean, sanitary and inoffensive condition, and free and clear of obnoxious substances, materials, weeds and rubbish. (a) 3. All freestanding signs shall have a base condition that is: landscaped in an aesthetically pleasing or appropriate manner with hardy plant materials and/or elements that will remain attractive throughout the year, or finished in such a manner, whether in groundcover, lawn or hard -surfaces so as to be appropriate to the district and maintained for the entire year in an attractive manner, -5- (a) 4. Freestanding signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right of way and runs 16 feet from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face. ?n those instance where dimensions do not provide for a 2 foot setback from the Right of Way before a sign support post can be located, it is permitted to erect a centered single pole mount sign of which the road side edge of the sign is directly inside the R.O.W line. (a) 5. Freestanding signs may not exceed 32 square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than 12 feet, measured from the grade line at the base of the sign to the highest portion of any part of the sign structure. No sign dimension shall exceed the other by more than 4 times. (a) 6. Where property dimension.-, create circuMct 'Dees tha: do not allow for a free standing sign, a perpendicular building mounted sign or signs on the building erid wails may be permitted, upto 32 sq. ft to for any one signface, and in keeping with all the provisions of this ordinance and the applicable components of the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance" and subject to a review Offi by the Code cer, who may evaluate the sign application as to aesthetics, safety and conformance with all applicable codes and laws. The Code Officer, may, at his or her discretion, subject the application to review by the Zoning Board so as to receive guidance in making a decision in such an instance. (aO 7. Freestanding signs may not have changeable me ,agc areas unless required by the nature of the business itself, such as movie theatres, and subject to the discretion and approval of the Code Officer. (b) jYAJI Signs - Wall signs are to be permitted only in accordance with all applicable sections of this ordinance and the "South Burlingtonl Sign Ordinance", particularly Section 7(b) of that Ordinance. (c) Wall !Q x&nip Refer to Section 7(c) of the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". (d) i n - Entry signs which contain the words "enter" or "exit" and or related/similar wording are permitted as ground mounted or post -mounted signs and are not to exceed 3 square feet. Included on these signs may be a reference to a business or office or building only where that business is not directly served by a curb -cut at the property itself and shares a curb -cut with another or multiple businesses or entities, and when this circumstance occurs the total area of one side may not exceed 4 square feet. It is also desireable to coordinate lettering and design of these signs with the overall signage for the property it serves. (e) Mec,OEY Si ns - In instances where it is desireable to Iist multiple stores or offices within one complex and additional directory sign may be installed at the building entrances or in a suitable location to allow visitors, once within the property, to receive direction for a particular a particular location. These directory signs are not to be visible or compete with any advertising or informational signs designed to be visible from the travelled way and may not, in computation with other existing signs on the same property, exceed the allowable pe►rni;sable sign area. (f) City Directorv� • The City of South Burlington will establish a uniform Directory Sign System to be constructed and maintained by the City in the Public Right of Way at designated locations and designed to serve businesses, offices and entities which share a curb cut or building or groups of buildings. All businesses, offices, services, agencies and entities which share an entry or property are entitled to participate in this system for a fee as established and adopted by the City Council and included as pan of the Schedule for Permit Fees. The fee will cover the initial cost of sign panel fabrication for the individual entity, as well an appropriate percentage of the maintenance and management eiosts for the directory sign. I Z::t — -�- 1 VI lJ f'� L a Y la (g) Roof Signs = refer to Section 7(e) of the "South Burlington Sign Ordinance". (h) Banners and Pennants- Banners and pennants are not p,�.7nitted in this district with the following exceptions: Properly displayed flags of the city, state or country, with no more than 3 such flags permitted on any one property, and one banner sign, for civic, district (Merchant's association or organization) or public messages, and subject to the conditions outlined under `Temporary Signs" section of this ordinance. (i) PIQiWinC Signs - except for the provisons in this Ordinance, refer to Section 7(g) of the City Ordinance. 0) Billboard Signs - refer to Section 7(h) of the City Ordinance. (k) AnimHtd Sins:ti n Signs - refer to Section 7(i) of the City Ordinance. (1) Limited Access Facility - refer to Section 70) of the City Ordinance. (m) MarLwce Canonxor Awning S.� ign$ - are permitted but any signage on these structures will be considered pan of the total allowable sign area for a property and subject to all other provisions of this and the City Ordinance, and subject to the review and discretion of the Code Officer and/or Zoning Board. &c,lion 10. Temporary Sign (a) Temporary sins are permitted in this district but subject to the following conditions: The signs must be permitted under the procedures outlined for all sign permits; The dimensions of any temporary sign must not exceed tl,e allowable sign board area for any one sign face on a property; The signs permitted under this Scction are for a one month period only and subject to renewal at the end of each 30 day period and subject to the determination of the Code Officer as to type, materials, and design; Temporary signs are subject to permit fees as adopted by the City Council, and subject to waiver if for civic or public purposes, and Banner signs are considered temporary in nature and subject review by the Code Officer as to size and location, who may seek Zoning Board assistance in making a final determination, (b) TemnQra_U Store Window Si nS - refer to Section 7(k) of the City Ordinance. Section _1_ISection _i.i�ht Refer to Section 10 of the City Ordinance for (a), (b), (c) and (d) entries. (e) Intemally iIlunt natcd plastic signs with white or clear or other light colored -7- backgrounds are not permitted. Only internally illuminated signs with dark backgrounds and contrasting lettering will be permitted, so as to insure that the lettering is illuminated rather than the signboard, Section 12. De ign Standar - As provided for in Section I l of the City Ordinance with the following additions or exceptions; Delete (a); replaced by Section 7(a) of this ordinance and supplemented by Distret Design Guidelines shut as a separate element of this ordinance. ,SWion 13 =4,, ions; Refer to Section 12 in Somh Burlington Sign (City) Ordinance Section l L Defer to Section 14 of the City Ordinance Sections 15 ibrouWh-2-4; To be the same as in the Current City Ordinance. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: February 9, 1993 agenda items Date: February 5, 1993 3) SATURN SIGN APPEAL Enclosed is an appeal from J.W.J. Realty (i.e., letter from Thomas Heilman dated 12/15/92), appealing the decision of Zoning Administrator, Dick Ward, to deny J.W.J. Realty's request to place two (2) freestanding pylon signs on their Shelburne Road Chrysler Plymouth/Saturn property. Section 29 of the City's sign regulations directs appeals to the Planning Commission. Enclosed are the following documents: 1) sign regulations, 2) Memo from Dick Ward to the Planning Commission dated 12/30/92, and 3) draft City of South Burlington/Dorset Street/City Center "Overlay" Sign District Ordinance dated 3/18/91. Section 8(b) of the sign regulations states that "Except as provided in Sections 23 and 24 hereof, there shall not be more than one free-standing sign for each separate lot, regardless of how many businesses or commercial entities are located on such lot." The applicant's appeal references a provision in section 23(e) which allows "any unusual or special circumstances" regarding the number and size of freestanding signs in a "common signage plan" to be dealt with by the applicant via the appeal process as outlined in Section 31 (typo, should be section 29) below. Although it is not clearly written, Section 23 of the City's sign regulations applies only to the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District The applicant's property is not located within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. Therefore, the provisions contained within Section 23 do not apply to this property. Section 23 was added to the sign regulations in April, 1991 when the sign regulations were comprehensively updated to include the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. The concept of a section dealing with "Master and Common Signage Plans" ( today' s section 23 ) was first introduced on page two of the draft "City of South Burlington/Dorset Street/City Center "Overlay" Sign District Ordinance" (see enclosed document). Therefore, it is clear that Section 23 applies only to the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District and not to the applicant's property. 1 Memorandum February 9, February 5, Page 2 - Planning 1993 agenda items 1993 Section 24 allows more than one freestanding sign if a lot consisting of two or more distinct and separate businesses has two or more separate entrances to a public road. The applicant's property has only one entrance to a public road and therefore is entitled to only one freestanding sign. It is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request for two freestanding signs for the following reasons: 1) Section 29, "Appeals", states that "The Planning Commission may not grant variances, exemption, extra -ordinary relief or otherwise alter, amend, enlarge or modify the provisions of the ordinance...". It is staff's opinion that approving the request would be in direct violation of this provision. 2) Approving this request would set a bad precedent of approving multiple signs for properties with two or more distinct and separate businesses. Almost all of the commercial properties in South Burlington consist of multiple separate businesses (i.e., Blue Mall, Lakewood Commons, Talbot's Plaza, Dolan's commercial complexes, etc., etc.), and 3) Approving the request would set a bad precedent of approving multiple signs for businesses whose franchise policies require separate signs. The City should not allow the policies or rules of "chain" businesses to dictate community signage goals and policies. 4) BARRY'S TRANSMISSIONS - AUTO SALES & REPAIR - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the December 29, 1992 meeting (minutes not available) to give the applicant time to revise his site plan to eliminate one (1) curb cut. This property located at 1907 Williston Road lies within the Mixed Industrial & Commercial district. It is bounded on the north by Williston Road, on the east by Plywood City (vacant), and five (5) residences on Clinton Street, on the south by the INS building and several vacant lots on Kimball Avenue, and on the west by a construction equipment sales and service business. Access/circulation: The applicant has eliminated a 40 foot curb cut at the westerly side of the property and reduced the size of the easterly curb cut to 36 feet in width. Circulation is adequate. Staff recommends that signs be erected directing repair customers to the repair shop area. K M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer Re: Saturn signage appeal Date: December 30, 1992 The appeal by William Savoie through his Attorney Thomas Heilman has no merit and should not be heard by the Planning Commission. The appeal references Section 23 and 24 which provides for a Master and Common Signage Plan. The intent of those sections apply only to the Dorset Street/City Center District. Be advised that on December 2, 1992, J.W.J. Realty, d.b.a. Saturn applied for permits for nine different signs (see attached), the only sign which was in total compliance is the Saturn building sign. This office issued a permit for that sign (copy of permit attached) and rejected the others. Section 24 allows for additional wall signs when a lot is developed with two or more distinct and separate businesses. One could make an argument that Saturn and Plymouth/Chrysler are not distinct and separate businesses, however, since we approved two automotive dealerships, additional wall signs were permitted. Within other provisions setforth under Section 24 sub section B this appeal does not qualify for an additional pylon sign. Be further advised that the existing pylon sign is grandfathered by a variance granted prior to 1973. The appeal before the Commission is clearly a request for a variance which is not permitted under Section 29. Office Copy SIGN APPLICATION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT Date December � 19 92 Permit Number / A r j/ �� Applicant JWJ Realty 1095 Shelburne Road No. Street So Burlington VT - Town or City State Phone No. Location of sign Saturn Facility, 1095 Shelburne Road Name of busine ss No. Street Square footage of sign see 71ch Height of Sign on building Estimated cost $2 000.00 Date of erection December 1992 Name of Erector Plasti-Line, Inc. 623 Emory Road Knoxville Town' -or City Consent of Owner: The Address TN 37928 State Phone No. above named persdn is duly authorized to make n on my behalf. I believe the statements contained t to the best of my knowledge. of pplicant Signatu of Owner DO NOT WRITE BELOW T11IS LINE Application: REJECTED Reason for rejection Issued to V � l Fee Computation Code Officer G Date 2 19% Z-- Date 2 G SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER/PLYMOUTH - SATURN MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN SIGN LEGEND Sign A Saturn Pylon Sign Sign B Chrysler Pylon Sign Sign C Chrysler Building Sign (existing) Sign D Saturn Building Sign Sign #3 Directional Sign - "Chrysler Sales Parking" Sign #4 Directional Sign - "Chrysler Service Parking" Sign #5 Directional Sign - "Saturn Entry" Sign #6 Directional Sign - "Saturn Service Parking" Sign #7 Directional Sign - "Saturn Sales Parking" City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658-7958 I December 4, 1992 Mr. Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Sign application Saturn Dear Gary: Your request for permits to erect two pylon signs and five directional signs at 1095 Shelburne Road is hereby denied. Your wall sign as proposed for the Saturn building is acceptable. Section 8 of the City Sign regulations allows for not more than one free standing sign per lot, your application has two proposed. r Your directional signs as proposed contain logos and automobile brand names. Only direction wording is permitted. I am enclosing check #14107 in the amount of forty ($40.00) dollars. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. .� Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer 1 Encl RW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN RE: SIGN APPLICATION OF J.W.J. REALTY, INC. - d/b/a SATURN OF VERMONT NOTICE OF DECISION This matter came before the Planning Commission on the appeal of the Zoning Administrator's December 4, 1992 denial of applicant's request to place two (2) free-standing pylon signs at the premises located at 1095 Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington. The South Burlington Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this appeal on February 9, 1993. J.W.J. Realty, Inc. was represented by Attorney Thomas F. Heilmann. Based upon the information provided to the Planning Commission at the above -stated public hearing, the Planning Commission finds and concludes as follows: 1. Applicant owns lands and premises at 1095 Shelburne Road which is the site of two business; South Burlington Chrysler dealership and the Saturn of Vermont automobile dealership. This property has a single entrance to Shelburne Road. 2. Applicant proposes to place two free-standing pylon signs at the entrance to the above -described premises. 3. The City of South Burlington has a Sign Ordinance in effect which regulates the placement of signs in the City. 4. Section 8(b) of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance states that "Except as provided in Sections 23 and 24 hereof, there shall not be more than one free-standing sign for each separate lot, regardless of how many businesses or commercial entities are located on such lot." 5. Section 23 of the City of South Burlington's Sign Ordinance ("Section 2311) does not apply to the applicant's property. It applies only to the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. This is evidenced by the City's addition of this Section to its Sign Ordinance in April, 1991, at which time the Sign Ordinance was comprehensively updated to include the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. 6. Section 24 of the City of South Burlington's Sign Ordinance ("Section 2411) does not apply to the applicant's property. This section allows more than one free-standing sign if a lot consisting of two or more distinct and separate businesses has two or more separate entrances to a public road. Since applicant's property has only one entrance to a public road, pursuant to Section 24, it is entitled to only one free- standing sign. 7. Under Section 29 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance the Planning Commission is prohibited from granting variances, exemptions, and extraordinary relief, and is further prohibited from otherwise altering, amending, enlarging or modifying the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, the Planning Commission concludes that Sections 23 and 24 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance are not applicable in this matter; that the application and representations of the applicant do not satisfy the requirements of the applicable City of South 2 Burlington ordinance; and for such reasons the application is denied. DATED at South Burlington, Vermont, this 164 day of February, 1993. H:\SON544.fof lalz&— a- 4a4v-'-� Chairman, South urlington Planning Commission 3 LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDEON KING HOUSE 35 KING STREET R 0. BOX 216 BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05402-0216 THOMAS F. HEILMANN CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN MARY J. SIGLER ARTHUR SCOFF BARRETT.JR- December 15, 1992 TODD D.5CHLOSSBERG South Burlington Planning Commission c/o Ms. Margaret Picard, City Clerk 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sign Application - J.W.J. Realty, Inc. - Saturn of Vermont - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Planning Commission Members: TEILPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX a (802) 864-4659 Under the provisions of Section 29 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, J.W.J. Realty, Inc., the owner of lands and premises upon which the Saturn of Vermont automobile dealership is situated, hereby appeals that portion of the decision of the Zoning Administrative Officer that denies J.W.J.'s application to place two freestanding pylon signs on the premises. The provisions of Section 8 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance state that "except as provided in Sections 23 and 24, there shall be not more than one freestanding sign for each separate lot, regardless of how many businesses or commercial entities are located on such lot." The provisions of Section 23 of the Sign Ordinance permit the Planning Commission to deal with "unusual or special circumstances." We believe there are present here both unusual and special circumstances that warrant granting our appeal. The present situation is that there is an existing "Chrysler Plymouth" sign that is freestanding situated adjacent to Shelburne Road on J.W.J.Is property. That sign comprises approximately 80 square feet. We propose removing that sign and replacing it with two freestanding signs as shown on the plan submitted by Wiemann-Lamphere Architects, Drawing S1-1. The total square footage of the two proposed signs will be less in the aggregate than the existing single Chrysler Plymouth sign. The proposed signage plan calls for a 39 square foot Chrysler Plymouth sign and a 30.25 square foot Saturn sign. Thus, we are willing to reduce the present signage by 11 square feet or approximately 14 percent if our appeal is granted. As the Commission is aware, there are two separate and distinct automobile franchises represented at this location; one is Chrysler Plymouth and the other is a GM based franchise (Saturn). Both manufacturers have requirements in their dealer service agreements requiring freestanding signs. Secondly, the Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles has indicated to Saturn of Vermont that they request signs identifying the particular franchise as part of their issuance of approvals for new car dealers. South Burlington Planning Commission December 15, 1992 Page Two Third, as the Commission is aware, the Saturn facility is situated well off Shelburne Road and it may be difficult for the public to locate the dealership, particularly since Saturn is a new franchise to the State of Vermont. We believe that, as set forth in Section 29(b) of the Ordinance, the considerations which the Planning Commission is entitled to consider in approving this request fully support the relief sought herein. We are prepared to present supporting information at the hearing on this matter to show compliance with the criteria set forth in Section 29(b)(i)-(iv). Lastly, J.W.J. Realty and Saturn of Vermont want to emphasize to the Commission that this appeal does not call into question the judgment of the Zoning Administrative Officer in acting upon the sign request; we think it is clear under the ordinance that the Zoning Administrative Officer's jurisdiction is limited by the terms of the Ordinance and he acted prudently in passing upon the request. It is the Planning Commission that has the discretion and authority to grant the request that is made herein. We are forwarding to the City Clerk the appropriate appeal fee. Very truly yours, Tam ff�� Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lb City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 6, 1993 Thomas F. Heilmann Heilmann, Ekman & Associates, Inc. 35 King Street P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sign Application Appeal - Saturn of Vermont - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Heilmann: Please be advised that the Chairman of the South Burlington Planning Commission has scheduled a hearing on February 9, 1993 to consider the above referenced appeal. The hearing will be held at 7:30 P.M. at the South Burlington City Hall conference room. Serely, 06� " oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 5, 1993 Thomas F. Heilman, Esquire Heilman, Ekman & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 r Re: Sign Application Appeal - Saturn of Vermont - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Heilman: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission. meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, February 9, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. joe erely, Weith, City Planner Encls RJB/mcp Sol 4919 3 t Al -jam %, 6-tLt 4/9 iduy er V 7 ` .1_ a 3 G, �� �� i v 9/j i g� 4 .. �14-7 eh le— O 7ANohl, E ��/ M/ PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 G Febraury 18, 1993 Thomas F. Heilmann, Esquire P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sign Application, J.W.J. Realty, Inc. - Saturn of Vermont, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Heilmann: Enclosed please find a copy of the Notice of Decision on the above referenced matter. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si c -reiy, aw oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp a %� / - _ ' •-Y-%.� .74t emu, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 11, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the October 27, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cerel , V J e Weith, ity Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 27 OCTOBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 27 October 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, Catherine Peacock, William Craig, David Austin, Terry Sheahan, Mac Teeson Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Michael Dugan, Barbara Pell, Madeline Yandow, Joe Randazzo, Vernon & Gretchen Wamsganz, Khalid Mkhonovich, Jim Carroll, Ralph Veve, Stephen Vock, Gary Lavigne, Charles Brush 1. Other Buesines: Mr. Weith advised the Commission of an invitation from John Larkin for the Commission to visit the new Howard Johnson's ball- room. Mr. Weith noted receipt of a memo and letters from the Ben Franklin people. They have been asked by Farrell to delay the access improvements required by the Commission to begin on 1 October. Mr. Weith also noted that Farrell is coming in with a sketch plan on 10 November. Members agreed to discuss this at the end of the meeting. 2. Minutes of 23 June and 13 October: Mrs. Maher moved to approve the Minutes of 23 June as written. Mr. Craig seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Messrs. Austin and Teeson abstaining. Mrs. Maher noted that in the Minutes of 13 October, the word "know" in the last paragraph of page 4 should read "knew." Mr. Craig moved to approve the Minutes of 13 October as amended. Mr. Austin seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty to amend the parking and circulation of a commercial complex consisting of 2 buildings totalling 25,750 sq. ft. for auto sales & service, Chrysler Plymouth/Saturn dealership, 1095 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Vock said the change is a result of value engineering. The cost of moving the poles in order to widen the entrnace drive is over $40,000., and the companyvcouldn't justify this. As a com- promise, they have put in as much of a flare as possible without moving the utilities. Trucks can make that movement, although it will be tough. They are also relocating a few parking spaces PLANNING COMMISSION 27 October 1992 page 2 as a result of this change. They are also submitted a revised landscaping plan, as a few trees are being moved. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty to amend the parkinq and circulation of a commercial complex consisting of two buildings totalling 25,750 sq. ft. for automobile sales and service as de- picted on a two pa e set of plans, pa e one entitled "Saturn of South Burlington,_ Site Plan," re ared b Civil En ineerin As- sociates, Inc, dated June 1992, last revised 8-18-92 with the followin stipulations: 1. All revious a rovals and stipulations which are not su er- seded by this approval shall remain in effect 2. Prior to recording -the revised final_p lat lans the applicant shall submit a revised landscapinglapd§qaping lan to the.City Planner for approval. 3. The revised final lat lans shall be recorded in the South Burlin ton Land Records within 90 da s or this app roval is null and void. The lans shall be signed._by, the Planning Commission Chairman or Clerk prior to recording. Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion assed 6-0 with Mr. Austin ab- staining. 4. Final Plat application of Dorset Land Co, for subdivision of 11.94 acres of land into two parcels of 11.64 acres and 0.3 acres, 421 Dorset St: Mr. Austin stepped down during this discussion. Mr. Brush said there was a disagreement as to whether a legal subdivision exists, so they decided it was best just to do it. He indicated the piece of land being subdivided from the larger piece. Mr. Burgess noted it fronts on a 50 ft. right of way that is supposed to be an extension of Oakwood Drive. Regulations limit the number of residences off a private drive to a total of 3. There are currently 3 residences existing. He made it clear that if anything more is built there, the road will have to be built to city 5�-andards. Mr. Weith added that all easements must be shown. Ms. Peacock moved the Commission a rove the final lat 2pp lica- tion of Dorset Land Com an for subdivision of 11.94 acres of land into two arcels of 11.64 acres and 0.3 acres as de icted on a lan entitled "Plat of Surve of Dorset Land Co., Inc," re - pared by Trudell Consulting_Engineers, Inc, and dated 1/6/88, City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 18, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 28, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please let me know. cerely, e Weith, ty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp cc: Stephen Vock PLANNING COMMISSION 28 July 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 28 July 1992 at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: Mary -Barbara Maher, Acting Chairperson; Catherine Peacock, William Craig, Mac Teeson Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Lance Llewellyn, Michael Schaal, Gisele & Steve Lizewski, Terry & Steve Adams, Mildred Estey, Barbara Pell, Maria Desrosiers, Madeline Yandow, Cecile Chalifoux, Bill Savoie, Gary Levine, Stephen Vock, Charlie Brush, Charles & Roland Deslauriers, G. L. Maxfield, Brian Waxler, Francis Sullivan, Roger Dickinson, Terry Boyle, Bill Wessel 1. Other Business: Mr. Llewellyn requested that Item # 7 be withdrawn from the agenda. Mr. Craig moved to continue Item #7 until 4 August. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 2. Public Hearing: Final Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of 2 buildings totalling 25,750 sq. ft. for automobile sales & service, 1095 Shelburne Rd.: Mr. Lavigne reviewed the plan. They will upgrade the entrance and customer parking and service area. They are creating a driveway back to the Saturn facility. The applicant will bring in an 8" water main. Further upgrading will include curbed lanes and grassed islands. As requested, two parking spaces have been removed from the plan and trees have been added on Shelburne Rd. Ms. Peacock moved the PkanrjLng Commission_�appKove the Final Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consistin of two buildings totalling 25,750 gin. ft. for automobile sales and service as depicted on a ten page set of plans, pa e one en- titled "Saturn of South Burlin ton Site Plan," re ared by Civil Engineering Associates and dated June, 1992, last revised 7/13/92 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to issuance of a zonin buildin ermit, the a licant shall post a $12,900, 3-year landscap in bond. 2. The a licant shall contribute prior to permit $1,515. to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on 59 addi- tional peak hour trip ends estimated to be generated b this PLANNING COMMISSION 28 July 1992 page 2 project. 3. An additional sewer allocation of 150 d is approved for the new buildin The applicant shall pay this required sewer allo- cation fee prior to permit. 4. The Plannin Commission approves the proposed 60 foot wide curb cut in order to ade Likptf�l_y accommodate car deliver trucks. 5. Any new li htin shall be downcastin shielded luminaire and shall not cast light beyond the property line. 6. The 15 foot easement for the water line on the--adjoiningro- pp�rty to the west shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records rior -to issuance of a zonin buildin ermit. The ease- ment shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. 7. The final lat shall be recorded in the South Burlin ton Land Records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The lat shall be si ned b the _Planning_Commission Chairman or Clerk prior to recordin . Mr. Craig seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Public Hearing: Revised Final Plat application of John & Joyce Belter to adjust the rear lot lines of lots 10-19 of the 36-lot single family subdivision known as White Rock Point located north of Country Club Estates, Poor Farm Road: Mr. Llewellyn noted the original approvals were in 1989 and 1991. Lot 11-19 extend down to the Winooski River and Act 250 requires a 75 foot buffer between lots and the river. They also require that this buffer be heavily landscaped. A storm sewer also has to be moved. Ms. Peacock moved the Planninq Commission approve the revised Final Plat apiplication of John & Joyce Belter to adjust the rear lot lines of lots 10-19 of the 36 lot sin le -family subdivision known as White Rock Point as depicted on a five page set of plans, page one entitled "White Rock Point, Property of John Belter, Site & Utilities Plan," prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Inc, and dated 2l8.8,_ last_revised 615190 with the followingstip- ulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this aproval shall remain in effect. 2. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlin ton land records within 90 da s or this a royal is null and void. The plans shall be si ned by the Plannin Commission Chair or City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 16, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership, 1093 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced projects which were rendered on 6/23/92 and 10/29/92. If you have any questions, please let me know. i cerely, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl` JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 23, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Revised Saturn Plan, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, October 27, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, Joe Weith� City Planner Encls JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 3, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the June 23, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. n erely, J e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 23 June 1992 page 2 remain the same. This building will replace a 288 sq. ft. office trailer. Mr. Weith noted the Airport is working on a landscape plan that will include the $1,800. for this project. They are trying to improve the front of the Airport. They may come to the Commission if there are parking and/or circulation changes. Mr. Weith noted there is an issue of a hydrant. The Chief asks that it be raised and a gate be put in so it can be accessed for this building. Mr. Dugan said they have no problem with this. Ms. Peacock moved the Planning Commission a rove the site lan application of Hertz Corporation for construction of a 900 sq ft. addition to an existing buildin for office stora e use in con 'unction with automobile rental as depicted on a lan entitled "Hertz, Burlin ton International Airport, South Burlington Ver- mont," prepared by Michael Du an and dated 12/3/91, last revised 5/26/92, with the following,stipulations: 1. The landscaping requirement for this project is $1800. As stated in two letters dated 12 10 91 and 6 19 92 from BIA Di- rector of Aviation, J.J. Hamilton, this $1800 of required land- scaping shall be incorporated into a landscaping,master lan which is currently being,developed for the airport ro ert . 2. An additional sewer allocation of 60 gpd is granted. The a - plicant shall pay the $2.50 per qallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. 3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occu anc for the addi- tion, the existin hydrant located west of the Hertz buildin shall be raised and a gate shall be installed in the fence to allow proper access to the hydrant. 4. The zonin buildin ermit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of 2 buildings totaling 25,750 sq ft. for auto sales and service, 1095 Shelburne Rd: Mr. Burgess noted this is the Saturn dealership. They had a sketch plan reviewed and there was an issue of the CO -Zone around what may or may not be a minor stream. Mr. Lavigne showed the original plan and then a revised plan which does not violate this area. They will be no closer to it than there is now paving. This will leave them enough parking. Mrs. Maher asked to what extent the plan doesn't conform to city PLANNING COMMISSION 23 June 1992 page 3 requirements. Mr. Weith said it now conforms. Mr. Craig noted it is still too close to the stream but is no closer than at present. Mr. Lavigne said they will remove the 2 parking spaces discussed at the last meeting. Mr. Burgess noted the Agency of Transportation has to approve the widening of the curb cut. Mr. Weith and other members felt this was needed. Mr. Weith asked that there be street trees along the right-of-way on the south side. Mr. Savoie said they didn't want to block the building as they are limited to one sign. Mrs. Maher said linden trees would be OK and wouldn't block the canopy. Ms. Peacock asked about stabilization of the stream bank. Ms. Snyder of the Natural Resources Committee showed the area where the bank is eroding. She felt some kind of vegetation is needed and felt it would be beneficial to the applicant because erosion would affect pavement. Mr. Savoie agreed and said they would work it out with the City Planner. Mr. Burgess noted that lighting seems to be very intense and asked how this would affect neighbors, especially a planned res- idential development. Mr. Lavigne said lighting will not go be- yond the property line. The Police have asked that lighting stay on till 2 AM. Mr. Weith stressed that 3-5 ft. candles is very bright. Mr. Lavigne said most newer car lots have the same intensity. Ms._ Peacock moved the Planning Commission approve the Prelimin- ary -Plat of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial com lex consistingof two buildings totallin 25 750 s . ft. for automobile sales and services as dg icted on a twelve page set of lans, a e one en- titled "Saturn of South Burlin ton Site Plan," re ared b Civil Engineering "Associates and dated June 1992, last revised June 16, 1992, with the followin stipulations: 1. Prior to shall post plan shall lining Shel suance of a zonin /buildin permit the a a $12,900, be revised burne Road 3-year landscapin bond. The lan prior to final plat to show decid south of the entrance drive. plicant scapin_q ous trees 2. The applicant shall contribute prior to permit $1,515 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on 59 addi- tional peak hour trip ends estimated to be enerated by this pp r�,,_ 3. An additional sewer allocation of 150 pd is approved for the t PLAMVrT TG COMMISSION JUNF 23, 1992 page 4 new building,,____The applicant shall ay this required sewer al- location fee prior to permit. 4. The Planning -Commission a roves the ro osed 60 foot wide curb cut in order to ade uatel accommodate car delivery trucks. 5. Any new li htin shall be downcastin shielded luminaire and shall not cast li ht beyond the property line. 6. The plan shall be revised prior to final plat to show the followin a._sheet #1 shall show the distance and bearina for the westerl boundary; b. draina e easement consistent withplan filed in land records; c. sheets 1, S-1, and S-2 shall be consistent in terms of -Parkin layout and number of parkin spaces; d. the 2 2Arking, spaces closest to Shelburne Rd. removed 7. The 15 foot easement for the water line on the ad'oinin ro- perty to the west shall be recorded in the South Burlin ton Land Records prior to issuance of a zonin buildin ermit. The ease- ment shall be approved by the City Attornev prior to recordina. 8. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant shall install lantin s along,the stream bank to help_stabilize the areas currently_exgerienqjng erosion. 9. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Sheahan seconded. Motion passed unanimouslv. 5. Presentation by the University of Vermont - proposed environ- mental safety facility, UVM Bio Research Complex, Spear Street: Mr. Burgess asked the representatives to limit their remarks to those issues that affect South Burlington. Mr. Bean showed a model of the proposed facility. The univer- sity has been working on the project since 1988 when they could no longer ship out chemical byproducts from research labs. The state has mandated that these be handled on campus. The state has reviewed the Part B permit from the standpoint of safety, management, etc., and this process took 2 years. The university has also met with the City Manager, City Planner and a Council member to discuss impacts to the city. Neighbors have been ap- prised of the plan. The site is across from the Dairy Farm on the Bio Research site. 7-a7-/0,J 'V-ale,io,tA -Am 4- -7 sarruR r� r r -v-J C. 0-101�4 -to (-Cr,- SQ Pz.IDI v �,* M E M O R A N D U M 4 To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: October 27, 1992 agenda items Date: October 23, 1992 3) J.W.J. REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - REVISED FINAL PLAT This project consists of altering the Shelburne Road access and relocating five (5) parking spaces. Final plat approval was granted on 6/23/92 (minutes enclosed). i Access: The curb cut will be reduced in width from 60 feet to 38 feet. They reason for the change is that the cost of relocating utilities to accommodate the wider access is too expensive. Parking: Five (5) parking spaces will be relocated from the south side of the access drive to the north side. This change will place two (2) handicapped parking space further away from the existing dealer facility and require that handicapped patrons cross the access drive. Staff does not see a problem with this. This situation occurs at many shopping centers where traffic volumes are much higher. Coverage: Front yard coverage will decrease from 30% to 24% (maximum allowed is 30%). 4) DORSET LAND COMPANY - 2 LOT SUBDIVISION - FINAL PLAT This project consists of the subdivision of an 11.94 acre parcel into a 11.64 acre parcel and a 0.3 acre parcel. This subdivision was part of the larger application for the medical and general office complex which was granted preliminary plat approval on 7/28/92 (minutes not yet available). 0 d, cC-, — J. C-0 MOTION OF APPROVAL SATURN I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat application of J.W.J. Realty to amend the parking and circulation of a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totalling 25,750 square feet for automobile sales and service as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "Saturn of South Burlington, Site Plan", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated June 1992, last revised 8-18-92, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to recording the revised final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to the City Planner for approval. 3. The revised final plat plans shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chairman or Clerk prior to recording. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 27, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final Plat application of Dorset Land Company for subdivision of 11.93 acres of land into two (2) parcels of 11.64 acres and 0.29 acres, 421 Dorset Street. 2. Revised Final Plat application of J.W.J. Realty to amend the parking and circulation of a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totalling 25,750 square feet for automobile sales and service, Chrysler Plymouth/Saturn Dealership, 1095 Shelburne Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission October 10, 1992 VERMONT 1 5 s chest was crushed in mishap. Isle County Sheriff reeling from the loss. "We've He had worked closely with post notice of the vacancy, invite -nce said the accident been getting calls from all over,' state officials on issues, including applications and appoint a suc- is the result of Dubu- people in state agencies who procedures for closing the 'town cessor, Chamberlain said. otion. worked with him, everyone," landfill. , e, who had been tow - working with wrecks had been removing ned car from behind otel in North Hero. ry, people in Grand cross the state were Paul istorlan Grand Isle Town Clerk Fay Chamberlain said. "He was such a devoted, hard-working public servant in the true sense of the word." Dubuque, a lifelong resident of Grand Isle, was chairman of the Board of Selectmen. LEGAL NOTICES 1 ADVERTISEMENT TO BID Town of Milton P.O. Box 9 Milton, VT 05468 The Town of Milton in- vites bids from qualified contractors for the con- struction of a . pavilion building to be located at the Milton Recreation Park. Bombardier Road, Milton. Copies of plans will be available at the Town Manager's Office, Main Street, Milton, Vermont October 13, 1992. Sealed bids will be re- ceived by the Town of Milton at the Manager's Office until October 23, 1992 by 2:00 p.m. and then at said office publicly opened and read aloud. If there are any questions regarding bidding docu- ments or work to be per- formed. please contact James f= gerald, Town Manager at (802) 893- 6655. The Town of Milton re- serves the right to reject any and all bids. James Fitigerald Town Manager October 9. 10. 11 & 12, 1992 INVITATION TO BID.t DEPARTMENT.OR STATE BUILDINGS., STATE OF VERMONT xi _Continued Next Cok ma �� vi?I?►�c �f r�1t .y:r. i Now the other four selectmen — two who were elected in June when the board expanded to five members — must decide how to fill the vacancy left by his death. Dubuque s term would have expired in March 1994. There will be visiting hours today from 2 to 4 and 7 to 9 p.m. at St. Joseph's Catholic Church in Grand Isle. They could call a special elec- Dubuque's funeral will be at tion, but by law they also may 10 a.m. today in St. Joseph's. LEGAL NOTICES 1 I LEGAL NOTICES Electrical Contrac- tors are invited to bid on the Installation of energy conservation measures at the Vermont Statehouse, 115 State Street, Montpe lier, Vermont. Sealed bids will be received by the Depart- ment of State Buildings until 2:00 P.M., Wednes- day, October 28, 1992. At that time all bids accom- panied by proper Bid Se- curity will be opened and publicly read aloud at Two Governer Aiken Avenue, State Buildings Confer- ence Room. Bonafide Bidders may obtain documents at the Department of State Buildings, Two Governor Aiken Avenue, Montpelier, Vermont 05602, upon re- quest. A non-refundable deposit of $20.00 is re- quired. There will be a pre - bid meeting on Friday, October 16, 1992 at 9:00 A.M- at Two Governor Ai- ken Avenue, Montpelier, Vermont. By: John J. Zampieri, Commissioner October 8, 9, 10. 1992 MILTON PLANNING `COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING': The Milton Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tues- day, November 3, 1992, 7:05PM, at the Clark Me- morial Building, Main Street, Milton, VT. The following application will be heard: Final Subdivision Plat Approval for the A plica- bw of,Sherman Taylor, for'the-estate of Mildred Hayes: 4 Lot Major Subdi- vision on Hardscrabble Road. 'Continued Next Column sr :IT-F/I Interested members of the public are encour- aged to attend the hear- ing. Plans of the proposed subdivision may be reviewed at the Town Planning Office, Clark Me- morial Building. Questions or Comments may be di- rected to Andrew Singela- kis, Town Planner, P.O. Box 9, Milton, VT 05468 or 893-1186. o,rol ., 10, 1992 NOTICE OF PUBLIC SALES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Notice is hereby given that the under- signed will sell to satisfy lien of owner, at public sale by closed bidding on October 21. 1992 10:00 A.M: Extra Space Storage Facility located at 5005 Williston Rd.. Williston, VL, the personal goods stored therein by the fol- lowing: 1451 Alex Lane 2504 Kim Smiley 4251 Charles Campbell Purchases must be made with CASH only and paid for AT the .time of sale. All goods are sold as is, where all items to be removed from unit at time of purchase. Sale is subject to adjournment. A $50.00 deposit will be made and refunded after unit has been emptied 'Ind BROOM CLEANED. October 10 and 17, 1992 NOTICIE TO BIDDERS Lewis Family Farm, Inc, invites the submission of sealed bids to furnish all materials, labor and equipment necessary to complete the demolition and removal of all existing buildings and im- provements of the Projecq Site so as to return the site to its natural condi- Continued Next Column LEGAL NOTICES 1 lion all in accordance with the plans and specifica. tions. The Project Site is located on lands owned by, Lewis Family Farm, Inc. on Whallons Bay Road in the Town of Es- sex. County of Essex, State of New York. A site Inspection can be ar- ranged by contacting Mark McKenna at the Le- wis.Family Farm at 518- 963-4208. Fax 518-963- 7710. Sealed bids will be received by Lewis Family Farm, Inc. c/o Briggs. Dwyer and Smith, P.C-. 33 Saranac Avenue. Lake Placid, New York 1294o. Telephone 518-523-4200. Fax 518-523-2842. Any bid may be with- drawn without prejudice prior to the time said bid is accepted by the mailing of a notice of award thereof. The bid documents including plans, condi- tions and specifications can be obtained from the offices of Briggs. Dwyer and Smith, P.C., at the address and telephone number noted above. Timely performance of the Contract shall be of the essence of the agreement and the Con- tractor shall be required to furnish a performance bond guaranteeing faithful performance thereof. However, Lewis Family Farm, Inc. reserves the right to.waive the require- ment of the performance bond in Its sole and abso- lute discretion. In determining the award of the bid, great weight wilt be given to the record, experience' and background of the bidder. Lewis Family Farm, Inc. expressly reserves the right to reject any and CaHinwd Next Cokxrn LEGAL NOTICES 1 all bids for any reason, to after or change the plans, conditions and specifica- tions or to waive any In- formality or defect in the bidding. DATED: October 7, 1992 Lewis Family Farm, Inc. by Briggs, Dwyer and Smith, P.C. Attorneys at Law 33 Saranac Avenue Lake Placid, New York 12946 October 10, 1992 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at ; the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 27. 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1. Final Platapplica- tion of Dorset Land com- pany for subdivision of 11.93 acres of land into two (2) parcels of 11.64 acres and 0.29 acres, 421 Dorset Street. 2. Revised Final Plat application of J.W.J. Real- ty to amend the parking and circulation of a com- mercial complex -consist- ing of two 2) buildings totalling 2550 square feet for automobile sales and service, Chrysler Plymouth/Satum Dealer- ship, 1095 Shelburne Road. Copies of the appii- cation are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City HaU, William Burgess Chariman, . South Burlington . Planning Commission October 10, 1992 9 PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 J October 16, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Revised Saturn Plan, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit a revised plan addressing these comments no later than Tuesday, October 20, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer , RaY morid J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls I. I �lllllfllill II - r1 Z 1 TAL RALe I r - I I E%RI[IO _— 'I - I I I I � I I I I I to I .h - :I I / z I 2°I J I -014 pp�.Ilr.rr -t4 t �t x., I • „,: . 10 ' I �- DLPLY 12 I I O I IEl SHELBURNE ROAD n n r- rl-�\ iP:- 1 BOLLARD DETAIL 1-2 SCAB: 3/4" - 1 •-O" NOfESI t. ON Sff TO BE COORDINATED W OUF�l1�G � NAI4AOIDt rOR 2. PHASE I E13 MIBfALL1N0 10 LNIH1 PCACT TNC�WITTNEE OM��FOR ExAcr Incw OF n+c LIGHT Polrs. MITE DATA 1. E%13TIN6 BUILDING 13.664 Or 2. PRQOOED BUILDING 9.071 91 3. SUBTOTAL BUILDING 21.B31 .1 (10.OR OOVERAOE 4. IAQOWW /AVE) AREA 120./20 Or (aT.Q OOVERADE a. TOTAL ►ROPOO[D(S 4) 142,787 A (Oa.Tle ODVZU r e. OITE AREA 207.708 BI (4.T6 ADR[O) PARRI NO soE.1rB1MLL�I [MTTM OO�HPMLER-►LYNOUTN OT011AGC/DIMLAY 13. M[T�TrUI`I OOr W. OURLINOTON [TDIIzi%Tu LAMYR 328 [HARED BTORAO[ 100 DO NOT BDAIE DIGWINGB NO. 1 DATE SITE LAYOUT PLAN SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE COLONEBRR. VERMONT COPYRIGHT O VAENANN-LAYPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. _ SCALE 1" - 30'-0" DRAWING NO. DATE 10-01-912 cwcmDRAINN�BY . SP - 2 PROJECT 02036 rl� 4 4, � � 4 v CZ/-,) � .��l; 5oX d3U ; M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files Ph From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - October 27, 1992 agenda items Date: October 15, 1992 J.W.J. REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - REVISED FINAL PLAT --- sheet 1 should show all handicapped spaces as shown on sheet SP-2. PJ'S AUTO VILLAGE - ADDITIONS - 2073 WILLISTON ROAD --- applicant requests credit for landscaping of Williston Road frontage. This landscaping was a requirement for the construction of the boat barn and the previously approved car care addition. It is staff's position that additional landscaping be planted as part of the showroom addition. The landscaping requirement is $2,500 and the plans should be revised to show this amount of additional landscaping. --- existing and proposed exterior lighting details should be submitted. --- the second light from Williston Road along the main access for boat sales and service and the light in front of the boat barn shine into eastbound traffic along Williston Road. These lights should be adjusted so that they do not cast light beyond the property line. --- some green space will be lost as a result of the showroom addition, this loss of green space is not reflected in the coverage information provided. --- new vehicles are being displayed along east side of main access which is not even on the applicant's property. Boats and boat trailers are being displayed/stored on lawn areas at many locations on the property. The August 21, 1990 Planning Commission approval stipulated that "there shall be no parking of vehicles or boats in the areas shown on the plan as grass or lawn". The applicant is in violation of this requirement. --- dumpsters should be shown and screened. --- plan does not show four (4) evergreen trees located on the east side of the boat barn access. The plan should accurately show all existing landscaping. ;5-autit S urlt`ugtuu dire Department r � 575 Burset street �nutb N urlingtnn. Uermunt 05403 1 FAX: (802) 658-4748 (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY OCTOBER 27,1992 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 7,1992 1. P.J. AUTO VILLAGE PROJECT # 92068 WILLISTON ROAD PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WHICH WOULD EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 2. SATURN OF SO. BURLINGTON PROJECT # 92135 SHELBURNE ROAD AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THE CHANGES WHICH WOULD EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 3. MERRILL'S SHOW CASE 1216 WILLISTON ROAD THE ADDITIONS ON THIS PROJECT WILL NOT EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION. 4. DORSET LAND COMPANY 2 LOT SUBDIVISION 421 DORSET STREET PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WHICH WOULD EFFECT EMERGENCY PROTECTION. PLANNING COMMISSION 29 SEPTEMBER 1992 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, September 29, 1992, at 7: 30 p.m. in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Mary -Barbara Maher, , William Craig, Catherine Peacock, Terry Sheahan, and Mac Teeson. Member Absent: David Austin Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner, John Steele, Paul Duchesneau, Craig Pable, Sid Poger, The Other Paper; Jeffrey Pascoe, Nancy Pascoe, John Larkin, Greg Rabideau, David White, Roger Dickinson, Brian Waxler, Rod Geant, Ernie Pomerleau, Tony Pomerleau, Chris Dunn, Lowell Crasner. 1. Other Business: a. Joe Weith stated he has a request from Peter Judge for a six- month extension, for his site plan approval for the 20,000 square foot retail building on Corporate Way which was approved on April 14, lJC_)2, and he would like a six-month extension to April 14, 1993. Ms. Feacock moved for _a sip: -month extension. Mr. Craig seconded. The _motion_ assed unanimously_ b. Joe Weith stated the Saturn Dealership on Shelburne Road has submitted a revised access plan. The original access plan was to move two power roles with an estimated cost of �,5,000. The cost will be approximately $45,000 to move so3they would rather leave them there and redesign around them. Mr. Weith would like to send them straight to revised final plat. Mr. Craig stated he has two problems with it; 1) Saturn said they would need all of the radius to get their tractor trailers in there; and 2) the handicapped parking near the door has disappeared. Mr. Weith stated they originally wanted parking in front of the building and instead will have parking on the other side of the access road. He also stated they forgot to mark the handicap parking spaces on the -revised access plan. Pirs. hlaher said she doesn't mind going to revised final if Mr. Weith notifies Saturn that the Board may have questions about the two poles. Mr. Craig agreed with Nrs. Maher. Mr. Burgess stated that he should notify the applicant that it is not just going to be a matter of approving a radius change and a curb cut. Mr. Weith stated he will pass their concerns onto Saturn. 11r. Weith stated that the Board granted Ben Franklin at the end oI August to put in the permanent O'Dell Parkway irnproverr.ents. They were to commence construction of the City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 n September 28, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Srely, J Weith, C ty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT ANIF,NDMENT 1) Name of Applicant 2) Name of Subdivision J. W. J. Realty same as above 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application NONE. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since final �&MXMIhyaW plat application: Change in entry due to the 300% increase over preliminary estimates from utilities. Front yard coverage has decreased. No change in arki 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulatio s for inor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a or su vision. r (Signature a lica or contact person ate n STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF 'IRANSPOR'rAT10N 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633 SPpR September 16, 1992 Saturn of Vermont 1835 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 64+15 - L.S. 66+65 Lt. Dear Sir: Your application for a permit to construct sidewalk and revise access curbing, at the locations indicated, has been processed by this office and is enclosed. Please contact the District Transportation Administrator, John Wood, to discuss the permit conditions and to arrange for his timely inspection of the work. His telephone number in Essex Junction is 655-1580. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Enclosures cc: John Wood, District Transportation Administrator #5 Steven Vock, P.E., Civil Engineering Associates Joe Weith, City Planner, City of South Burlington Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Log S,.au0n STA i H OF �R1`10Tr'T ) .jam L?u AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Usk PERMIT APPLICATION Owner's Name, Address cC Phone No. ..........Saturn.........Vermo...n. t ......... of f........................................................................................................... 1835 Shelburne Road, So: Burlington? Vermont 05403 862-7873 .....................................................-........................................................................................... Co -Applicant's Name d: Address &- Phone No. (if different from above).......................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ The location of work (town, highway route, distance to nearest mile marker or intersection & which side) U.S. Route 7, So. Burlington at the west side of the intersection with ........... . `-3 Baldwin Avenue. .....••............................................................................................................»........................................................................................... Description of the work to be performed (attach sketch) Construct sidewalk and revise curbin o..................................................................................ia. ...................... within AOT right-of-way. --................................................................................................................................................................................................................ U Yes (Act 250 is not required.) Rec'd local Permit. < Have zoning or Act 250 permits been applied for%.............................................................................................................................. If yes, give application # or other identification, if different from above. Date work expected to begi On-s ' e work is under construction 19 ........ .............................................................................................. Owner............................. ..... ....... .. ..... ...:............................................................................................................ .. Date..../.../..1...1.7.`.......................... Co-Applicant.............................................................................................................................................................................. By............................................................................................................................................................................................... PERMIT APPROVAL This permit is issued with the following directions, restrictions and conditions, and covers only the work described hereinafter, and then only when the work described is performed as directed, and subject to the following special conditions: Permission is granted to construct sidewalk and revise access curbing,. as..Ajj(? ... ........... ..... ......... ...................................................................... ,on„plan sheet C-1 of project„#92135 by Civil., Engineering Assoe:�„in accord with the ........................ attached. three sheets of Special Conditions and the attached plan, .................. .... ..... ..... ................................................. Work to be completed b}................................................................................??eGe?l>ber...►.. 19 -91. Patrick Garahan Se Transponabon By ...� .... .................. Date ......9�16/92.... 'giri ' g"5ervice's''�rigrieer NOTICE: This permit covers only the Vermont Agency of Transportation's jurisdiction over this highway under Title 19 Section I I I I VSA. It does not release the petitioner from the requirements of any other statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. This permit is effective upon compliance with such of these other requirements as are applicable. SEE OTHER SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CON'DiTIONS No work shall be done under this permit until the party or parties to whom it is Granted shall have communicated with and received instructions from the Distract Transportation Administrator at ...... the--J)i51riQt...# 5..Qff ce...iD..1�agex............ Jct.t DTA John Woodr...phone 655-1580.................................................... Z......................................... TA 210 6M 8/89 RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS GENERAL CONDITIONS: The word "Engineer" as used herein is to mean the authorized agent of the Chief Engineer. The word "Agency" as used herein is to mean the Vermont Agency of Transportation. The word "Applicant" as used below is to mean the parry(s) to whom the permit is to be issued. Permit is granted subject to compliance with all federal and state statutes or regulations controlling occupancy of public highways, and adherence to all governing local or national codes, unless specific conditions quoted herein arc molt restrictive. Compliance with all local ordiances and regulations relating to highways is required. All work, including rock blasting, shall comply with all the laws and regulations of the State of Vermont_ The permit holder must, in every case where there is a possibility of injury to life or property in blasting, use blasting mats and bags of sand, if necessary, to prevent the stone from scattering. During the progress of the work, all existing utility facilities shall be property protected from damage or injury. Such barriers, as may be necessary for the protections of the traveling public, shall be erected and maintained and shall be property lighted at night. The Applicant shall be responsible for all damages to person or proper due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. F-xcept as herein authorized, no excavation shaU.AK made or obstacle placed within the limits of the state highway in such a manner as to inierfere, unnecessarily, with travel over said road. If any work done under this permit interferes with the drainage of the state highway, such catch basins and outlets shall be constructed as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Engineer, to take proper care of said drainage. The Applicant shall pay the entire cost of the proposed work and the salary, subsistence and traveling expenses of any inspector appointed by the Engineer to supervise such work. The permit may be modified or revoked at any time by the Engineer without nmmdering the Agency or the State of Vermont liable in any way. In addition to any other enforcement powers that may be provided for by law, the Engineer may suspend this permit until compliance is obtained. If there is continued use or activity after suspension, the Engineer may physically close the driveway or access point if, in the opinion of the Engineer, the safety of highway users is or may be affected. All of the above conditions shall be applicable to the work herein authorized, unless the same are inconsistent with the conditions on the face of the permi4 in which case the conditions written or printed on the face of the permit shall apply. The acceptance of this permit, or the doing of any work thereunder, shall constitute an agreement by the par or parties to whom this pemit is granted, to comply with all of the conditions and restrictions printed or written herein. RELATING TO UTILITY WORK AND THE CUTTING AND TRIMMING OF TREES: This permit is granted on condition that the Applicant shall obtain the written consent of the adjoining owners or occupants or, in the alternative, an order from the State Transportation Board in accordance with Title 30, Section 2506, Vermont Statutes Annotated, regarding injury to trees. In general, all utilities shall be located along and closely adjacent to the highway right-of-way boundary line and shall be installed in such a ma ner ,hat no damage will result to highway property. No pole, pushbrace, guy win: or other above -ground facilities shall be placed closer than thirty (30) feet from the edge of pavement unless the existing right-of-way is insufficient width Should the location of the utility facilities covered by this Permit be in conflict with the above, each lo.auon must be reviewed by the Engineer, and approved only if, in his opinion, the minimum durance cannot be obtained. In the event that observation of the minimum standard will result in the placing of such facilities within 4.0' of the center of a maintained or natural ditch or withi^. 10.0' of the inlet or out -let of a cul,• -_r, or my type of waterway which crosses the highway, no anchor guys, pushbraces or other appurtenances shall cross a ditch and thereby be installed between the ditch and roadway. Unless otherwise herein provided, no trees within the limits of the state highway shall be cut or trimmed. No guy wires shall be attached to trees without a special permit from the engineer, and in no event shall they be attached as to girdle -tie tries or in any way interfere with their growth. Wires shall be so protected at all times and places that they shall not interfere with or injure the trees inside or outside the location of the highway. Where the cutting or trimming of trees is authorized by permit, only such cutting and trimming shall be done as may be designated by the Engineer. All debris resulting from such cutting and trimming shall be removed from the highway limits. Open cut excavation for highway crossings is NOT the option of the Applicant, and may be utilized only where attempted jacking, drilling or tunneling methods fail or prove to be impractical. The Applicant shall obtain an appropnuc modification of the highway pcmtit from the Engineer prior to the utilization of open cut methods. The party or parties to whom the permit is granted shall maintain the the surface of the roadway over said structures as long as the Engineer may deem necessary, until all signs of the trench shall have been eliminated. IOlN7 PER.NIITS - A joint permit applicant is required when more than one party will be responsible for the cons operation of the facility being constructed under this permit. Examples art joint ownership or occupancy of a utility pole line and coos line by a contractor. Both utility companies, and in the second case, the municipality and the contractor must be joint applicants. /f� :0 `y �L 14 UTILITIES SECTION ���. i Saturn of Vermont South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 64+15 - L.S. 66+65 Lt. September 16, 1992 SPECIAL CONDITIONS This permit is granted subject to the conditions on the back of the permit, with particular attention given to the Special Condi- tions listed below. All work shall be accomplished in accordance with the attached plan dated June 1992, last revised August 18, 1992, and Standard Sheets C-2a and C-3. Legislative Act 86 ("Dig Safe") requires that notice be given prior to making an excavation. It is suggested that the Permit Holder or his/her contractor telephone 1-800-225-4977 at least 48 hours before, and not more than 30 days before, beginning any exca- vation at any location. Roadway shoulder areas will be maintained free of unnecessary obstructions, including parked vehicles, at all times while work is being performed under this permit. All grading within the highway right-of-way associated with the proposed construction shall be inspected and approved by the District Transportation Administrator or his staff. Seeding and mulching shall be done in accordance with Section 651 Turf Establishment of the latest edition of the Standard specifications for Construction published by the Vermont Agency of Transportation and to the satisfaction of the District Trans- portation Administrator. All work in the State highway right-of-way shall be performed during normal daylight hours and shall cease on Sunday, on holidays which shall include the day before and the day following, during or after severe storms, and between December 1 and April 15 without specific, written permission from the District Transportation Administrator. These limitations will not apply for the purposes of maintenance, emergency repairs, proper protections of the work which includes, but is not limited to, the curing of concrete and for the repairing and servicing of equipment. The Permit Holder shall be responsible to rebuild, repair, restore and make good all injuries or damage to any portion of the highway right-of-way that has been brought about by the execution of the permitted work, for a period of eighteen (18) months after final inspection by the District. Saturn of Vermont South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 64+15 - L.S. 66+65 Lt. Special Conditions Page Two Any variance from approved plans is to be recorded on "as- builts" with copies provided to both the Utilities Engineer and the District Transportation Administrator. The Permit Holder shall be responsible for all damages to persons and/or property due to or resulting from any work done under this permit. The Permit Holder shall indemnify and save harmless the State, the Agency, and all of their officers, agents, and emplo,'ees from all suits, actions, or cicairs of any character, name and description brought for or on account of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property, including all costs or expenses to defend against such suits, actions or claims. The access must be constructed in such a manner as to prevent water from flowing onto the highway. If the access is not construc- ted satisfactorily, the District Transportation Administrator can order reconstruction of the access at the Owner's expense. In the event traffic from this development increases to the point where additional lanes for turning or any other modifications are necessary, the expense of such improvements or facilities shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors, and assigns. The determination of need for such measures is the responsibility of the Agency of Transportation and will be based upon and justified by standard Agency procedures. The Permit Holder is responsible for access maintenance (beyond the edge of pavement). In conformance with Title 19 ;7SA Cj 1111 (f) , this access may lZe eliminated in the future where development has burdened the highway system to such an extent that a frontage road must be constructed to alleviate this burden. The expense of the frontage road shall be borne by the Permit Holder, his/her successors or assigns of the properties abutting said frontage road. The Agency of Trans- portation shall determine the need of a frontage road based upon and justified by standard Agency procedures. It is incumbent upon the Permit Holder to verify the appro- priate safety measures needed, prior to construction, so proper devices and/or personnel are available when and as needed. Traffic control devices, shall be in conformance with the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), Agency of Transportation Standards and any additional traffic control deemed necessary by the District Transportation Administrator. Failure to utilize proper measures shall be considered sufficient grounds for the District Transporta- tion Administrator to order cessation of the work immediately. Saturn of Vermont South Burlington, US 7, L.S. 64+15 - L.S. 66+65 Lt. Special Conditions Page Three Construction will be performed in such a way as to minimize conflicts with normal highway traffic. Uniformed traffic officers or trained flagpersons, shall be provided when two-way traffic cannot be maintained, and at the request of the District Trans- portation Administrator whenever he deems it necessary for the protection of the traveling public. r Ty CLERK'S OFFICE. Received 0 Ion pagei 9. at Recn rue Sag Of So r_,,1,,;1on Land Recor Attest: �A, ,v�`o�M�r DEED AND GRANT OF EASEMENT Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that JAMES J. FAYETTE of Shelburne, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby GIVE, GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL, CONVEY, and CONFIRM unto J.W.J. REALTY, INC., a Vermont corporation with its principal place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (hereinafter referred to a"s the "Grantee"), its successors and assigns, forever in perpetuity, a certain easement within the land and premises of the Grantor situated in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, and described in "Exhibit All attached hereto. The easement conveyed herein is more particularly described and located as follows: Beginning at a point along the Grantor's easterly property line (said property line being 579.64 feet in length) approximately 215 feet from a found iron pipe located at the southwest corner of the Grantee's property, and running in a generally southerly direction for a distance of approximately 410 feet generally easterly of, parallel to and partially within a 20 foot wide sanitary sewer easement conveyed by deed of Fayette Co., Inc. to the Town of South Burlington dated November 13, 1970 and recorded in Volume 96 at Page 185 of the South Burlington Land Records, across the northerly boundary of a proposed street which is the subject of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication to the City of South Burlington and recorded in Volume at Page of the South Burlington Land Records and terminating at a tapping sleeve and valve within said proposed street. Reference may be made to a plan entitled "L&M Park Proposed Subdivision Plan" dated Dec., 1990, bearing Drawing No. D3724, prepared by Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Incorporated and recorded in Map Volume 286 at Page 1 of the South Burlington Land Records and to a plan entitled "Saturn of South Burlington Site Plan," Sheet No. 1 dated June 1, 1992 and revised July 13, 1992 and Sheet No. 2 dated April, 1992 and revised June 16, 1992, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. of Shelburne, Vermont and recorded in Map Volume at Pages of the South Burlington Land Records in further aid of this description. The Grantee shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, extend, operate, maintain, move, replace, alter, inspect, repair, remove, relocate, change the size of and abandon in place pipelines desired by the Grantee for the transportation of water, together with all of the rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment of the rights, privileges and easements hereby granted. As used herein, the term "pipeline" shall also include such surface or subsurface pipeline, appurtenances, and facilities as may be necessary or convenient, in the judgment of the Grantee, for the operation and/or maintenance of any such pipeline. The precise centerline of the easement is to be determined in the discretion of the Grantee and the centerline of the pipelines as installed shall establish conclusively the center line of the easement herein conveyed. The width of the easement shall be fifteen (15) feet, consisting of 7.5 feet on each side of the center line. The Grantee shall have the right of ingress and egress over the Grantor's land at convenient points for the exercise of the rights, privileges and easements herein granted. By acceptance of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless from liability for damages, injuries or otherwise, whether to Grantee, its agents or others, caused by fault or negligence of Grantee or its agents while on the Grantor's land. The Grantor covenants and agrees not to construct or erect or permit the erection or maintenance of buildings or structures of any kind on, or change the elevation of ground within, said fifteen (15) foot easement without the written permission of the Grantee. By acceptance of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee covenants for itself, its agents, successors and assigns that whenever entry is made upon the lands of the Grantor for any purpose described in or related to this easement, that the lands of the Grantor shall thereafter be restored to substantially the same condition as existed prior to such entry. Vermont Federal Bank, FSB, by executing this Deed of Easement, releases from the security and lien of its Mortgage dated March 24, 1987 and recorded in Volume 24 at Page 436 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein and also releases from the security interest in a Loan -Option Agreement obtained by Assignment dated March 24, 1987 and recorded in Volume 217 at Page 415 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein. In all other respects, the security and lien of the Mortgage and Assignment to the Lease -Option Agreement of Vermont Federal Bank, FSB shall remain in full force and effect. The Howard Bank, N.A., by executing this Deed of Easement, releases from the security and lien of its Mortgage dated October 10, 1991 and recorded in Volume 311 at Page 517 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein, and also releases from the security interest of a Collateral Assignment of Leasehold Rights dated October 10, 1991 and recorded in Volume 311 at Page 528 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein. In all other respects, the security and lien of the Mortgage and Collateral Assignment of Leasehold Rights of The Howard Bank, N.A. shall remain in full force and effect. The City of South Burlington, by executing this Deed of Easement, hereby consents to this Deed of Easement. The Grantee covenants that it shall not interfere with the City's lawful use of the sewer easement and roadway. In all other respects, the City's interest in the 20 foot wide sewer easement and in the roadway which is the subject of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall remain in full force and effect. John Larkin, Gerald C. Milot and the Larkin-Milot Partnership, Lessees under a Lease -Option Agreement dated May 29, 1985, as evidenced by a Memorandum of Lease -Option Agreement dated June 1, 1985 and March 25, 1987 and recorded in Volume 217 at Page 412 and Volume 217 at Page 476, respectively, of the South Burlington Land Records, as amended, by executing this Deed of Easement hereby consent to this Deed of Easement. In all other respects, the Lease -Option Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the aforegranted rights and easements, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging, unto and to the use of said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, to it and their own proper use, benefit and behoof. The foregoing shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the Grantor and the Grantee. Dated at , Vermont this .IN day of 1992. IN T E PRESENCE OF: J es J. a et e STA E OF VERMONT COUNTY, ss. �J►� At in said County, this day of , 1992, Ja �J�)yette personally appeared, and he ack 1wl ged this instrumen , by him sealed and subscribed, to be her free act and deed. Before me otary Public Dated at L�/(LG /STDy G 1992. -. P-4" By: STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. Vermont this :-?% day of VERMONT FEDERAL BANK, FSB It my uthorized Agent At , in said County, this q day of���� , 1992, k����,.t�.� a duly authorized agent of Vermbnt Federal Bank, FSB, personally appeared, and,. acknowledged this instrument, by kk�✓ sealed and subscribed, to be k,,,,— free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Federal Bank, FSB. Before me �• Notary Public lo(cr- Dated at�Vermont this )0day of 1992. THE HOWARD BANK, N.A. �D,cP_ c� . �r�PD�r c� By : . (�Q' V-P 11th Diirq�-Au-ffhioiied Agent C. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At dQh, in said County, this " day of %?_L ,CfC,f", , 1992, yYl, ApQ, (1). u/, a , a duly authorized agent of The Howard Bank, N.A., personally appeared, and %— acknowledged this instrument, by�-ealed and subscribed, to be/jj� free act and deed and the free act and deed of The Howard Bank, N.A. Before me ZcAn Nod Public Dated at 1992. STATE OF VERMONT Vermont this � 0 day of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON C " I I Its Duly Authori ed Agent CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. V1 At (Q(N in said County, this 10-L day of , 1992, A , a duly authorized agent of theotity of South Burlington, personally appeared, and it— acknowledged this instrument, by _" sealed and subscribed, to be free act and deed and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Dated Before me Notary Public at V���A' Vermont this day of 1992. LARKIN-MILOT PARTNERSHIP By: Its/my Authorized Agent We 7117affil" ald C. Milot STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At 1�je day of , in said County, this � � 1992, John Lakin and Gerald C. Milot, individually, J and 'L �A , duly authorized agent of the Larkin-Milot Partnership, personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, to be their free act and deed and the free act and deed'oi'the Larkin-Milot Partnership. Vermont Property Transfer Tax Before me.,,- - 32 V. S. A. Chap. 231 Notary Publib - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - RMM RECT) -TAX PAD -BOARD OF H:Pe_TH CLRT. RECD. Vr 4)Wk & DEYFIO KW WM ACT CERT RECD Retum No. Clerk Date Ym z State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED CASE NO. WW-5-0522 Environmental Protection Rules APPLICANT JWJ Realty Chapter 4, Public Buildings ADDRESS 1095 Shelburne Road Chapter 7, Sewage Disposal So. Burlington, VT Chapter 8, Water Supply 05403 Appendix A, Design Guidelines This project, consisting of construction of a 12,250 square foot building for use as a car dealership (10 employees) with municipal water and sewer located on Shelburne Road in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL (1) This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Act 250 District Environmental Commission, the Department of Labor and Industry (phone 828-2106), the Vermont Department of Health (phone 863-7220), and local officials PRIOR to proceeding with this project. (2) The project shall be completed as shown on the plans Project No. 92135 "Site Plan -Sheet 1" dated June 1992 last revised 6/16/92; "Plan & Profiles -Sheet 2" dated April 1992 last revised 6/16/92; "Water, Sewer, & Erosion Control Details - Sheet 3" dated April 1992 and "Specifications -Sheet 6" dated April 1992 prepared by Civil Engineering and which have been stamped "approved" by the Division of Protection. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Division of Protection. (3) No alterations to the existing building other than those indicated on the approved plan or Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit, which would change or affect the exterior water supply or wastewater disposal or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. (4) A copy of the approved plans and this Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-0522, JWJ Realty Aage 2 t� (5) In the event of a transfer of ownership (partial or whole) of this project, the transferee shall become permittee and be subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. (6) The Protection Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. WATER SUPPLY (7) The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources' "Public Water System Permit to Construct " Project #E-0121 & WSID #5091 to Saturn of Vermont dated July 29, 1992. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (8) The project is approved for connection to the Bartlett Bay wastewater treatment facility for a maximum of 150 gallons of sewage per day. Dated at Essex Jct., Vermont this 6th day of August, 1992. Elizabeth A. McLain, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Marsha J. Thompson Assistant Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky City of South Burlington Water Supply Division Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Civil. Engineering 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658-7958 August 25, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: Saturn Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: This is to confirm the fact that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on June 23, 1992 granted Final Plat approval to J.W.J. Realty for the construction of a new auto dealership (Saturn) at 1095 Shelburne Road. A copy of the minutes of this meeting including the Findings of Fact and Decision will be forwarded to you as soon as they are available. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i erely oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp ALA MM 7/28/92 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Final Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totalling 25,750 square feet for automobile sales and services as depicted on a ten (10) page set of plans, page one entitled, "Saturn of South Burlington Site Plan", prepared by Civil Engineering Associates and dated June, 1992, last revised 7/13/92, with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit, the applicant shall post a $12,900, 3-year landscaping bond. 2. The applicant shall contribute prior to permit $1,515 to the Shelburne Road Intersection Improvement Fund based on 59 additional peak hour trip ends estimated to be generated by this project. 3. An additional sewer allocation of 150 gpd is approved for the new building. The applicant shall pay this required sewer allocation fee prior to permit. 4. The Planning Commission approves the proposed 60 foot wide curb cut in order to adequately accommodate car delivery trucks. 5. Any new lighting shall be downcasting, shielded luminaire and shall not cast light beyond the property line. 6. The 15 foot easement for the water line on the adjoining property to the west shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records prior to issuance of a zoning/building permit. The easement shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recording. 7. The final plat shall be recorded in the South Burlington land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plat shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chairman or Clerk prior to recording. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: July 28, 1992 agenda items Date: July 24, 199'2 2) J.W.J. REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD This project, consisting of the construction of a 12,247 square foot building to contain a new auto dealership at 1095 Shelburne Road, received preliminary plat approval on 6/23/92 (minutes not yet available). Access/circulation: No change Coverage/setbacks: Overall coverage was reduced slightly from 69.2% to 68.7% as a result of eliminating two (2) parking spaces along Shelburne Road (maximum allowed is 70%). No other changes. Landscaping: The landscaping plan was revised to show two (2) deciduous trees lining Shelburne Road south of the entrance drive. This was a requirement of preliminary plat approval. Also the applicant will be planting 100 Bugleweed plants to stabilize the stream bank as previously required. Y Parking: Two (2) parking spaces along Shelburne Road were 01 eliminated as required. The total number of spaces available is now 373 spaces. Sheet 1 shows a handicapped space at the northeast corner of the Chrysler -Plymouth building which is not shown on sheets S-1 and S-2. Traffic: No change. Sewer: No change Lighting: No change. Applicant has indicated that the proposed sight lighting will have a lower average intensity as that currently provided at Nordic Ford. Other: City Engineer has reviewed these plans and finds them acceptable. WIEMANN•LAMPHERE A R C H I T E C T S E N G I N E E R S P L A N N E R S I N T E R I O R S July 7, 1992 Mr. William T. Szymanski City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Saturn Auto Dealership - Shelburne Road Garage Floor Drains coo Dear Bill: Per your July 2, 1992 request, I have enclosed the sand trap and oil interceptor details we propose to use on the garage floor drains prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Steven W. Shaw, P.E. SWS/cde encls COLCHESTER BUSINESS PARK 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE • COLCHESTER, VERMONT 05446 • 802-655-5020 • FAX 802-655-6567 FROM FLOOR IR►`10 3/4"-1 1/2" CRUSHED STONE NEENAH MODEL R-1642 FRAME AND COVER BRICK COURSES AND MOR AS REQUIRED TO RAISE LII AND FRAME TO FINISH CR/ et, NO HUB FITTINGS D.I. OUTLET . — ----- TO OIL INTERCEPTOR INV. I L 1 2" MESH ERE N OUTLET PIP.r SAND TRAP DETAIL N.T.S. Lv I 6" D.I. INLET INV. LEBARON FRAME & COVER, MARKED "SEWER" # LC266 OR EQUAL. ADJUST TO MEET FINISH GRADE F NISH GRADE �--, SET FRAME ON FULL MORTAR ••ti .-• --- - ALwua I Iv oRHUG .YYI I r1 t3mr-N, 3-5 COURSES, MORTARED INSIDE AND OUT e 3G" 2'-0- NON SHRINK GROUT OR CAST "t �•' A�•': •'q; : �' ?,.' ,n:. e' .• IN PLACE PIPE SEALS OUTLET - 6" PVC INV. _ a v e: l C WATER LEVEL ` e PRECAST CONCRETE TANK FORT MILLER 1000 GALLON HEAVY DUTY GREASE TRAP OR APPROVED EOUAL. ' 12" • A: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 24, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, �- ryi c /I Joe Weith, 4r City Planner Encls JW/mcp cc: Stephen A. Vock 1' LAW OFF'ICP.S HE(I.,MANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE ODEON KINC HOUSE 35 KING STP.FET P O COX 216 BUR LINGTC)N, VEPu\ ONT 4541k)2-p216 TI i MA. P. HCRl A�1,NjJ CHR.f,'.TOPHLR- D. EWAN MAPRY I. SICI.BR AP, f HUR SCO17 BARNETT IR TODD D. SCI ILOSSOORff July 15, 1992 Mr. Raymond Bela'ir Asst. Town Planner 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Easement Deed from fames Fayette to J.W.J. Realty, Inc. Dear Ray: T[L£I')ION£,102) 6Gd-a555 FAX 0 i I enclose for your review a draft of the Deed and Grant of Easement by which J.W.J. Realty, Inc., the owners of the parcel at 1095 Shelburne Road, will obtain water from the parcel contiguous to it, 1175 Shelburne Road. Will you kindly review this document. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me or Tom Heilmann. We hope to have the signatures of aii Par"iv'S to this easement before July 24, 1.992, We would appreciate knowing whether this easement is acceptable well before then so that we carr circulate the original for execution. Thank you. Very tr,�l yours, Chi e D. Ekman CDE:lb cc: Mr. William Savoie PEED AND GRANT OE EASEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS that JAMES J. FAYETTE of Shelburne, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"), in consideration of Ten and More Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby GIVE, GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL, CONvEY, and CONFIRM unto J.W.J. REALTY, INC., a Vermont corporation with its principal place of business in South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont (hereinafter ..-. F .-. ti-._ ., A � .. the .-. t f � ... � .. b .... l f � l �..r t GLG1L G1.{ �.v u.�7 L11C VLC11t4G� ) , 14.�. SIL �.: c:.C.r—S r'31�r .`T� alllal a•:-�Oigllb, forever in perpetuity, a certain, easement within the land and premises of the Grantor situated in the City of South Burlington, county of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, and described in "Exhibit All attached hereto. The easement conveyed herein is more particularly described ane located as follows: beginning at a point along the Grantor's casterly property line (said property line being 579.64 feet in length) approximately 215 feet from a found iron pipe located at the southwest corner of the Grantee's property, and running for a distance of approximately 410 feet generally easterly of and parallel to a 20 foot wide sanitary sewer Easement conveyed by deed of Fayette Co., Inc. to the Town of South Burlington dated November_ 13, 1970 and recorded in Volume 96 at Page 185 of the South Burlington Land Records, across the northerly boandary of a proposed street which is the sublec- of art irrevocable K Offer of Dedication to the City of South Burlington and terminating at a tapl-)ing sleeve and valve %-�ithin Caid proposed street. Reference may be made to a plan entitled f'L&M Park Proposed .- _f 1 . prepared by Fitzpatrick-Llewellyr,Incorporated and yrecorded �in Map Volume 286 at Page 1 of the South Burlington Land Records and to a plan entitled "Saturn of South Burlington Site Plan," Sheet No. 1 dated June 1, 1992 and revised July 13, 1992 and Sheet No. 2 dated April, 1992 and revised June 16, 1992, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. of Shelburne, Vermont and recorded in Map volume at Pages of the South Burlington Land Records in further a1d of this description. The Grantee shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, extend, operate, maintain, move, replace, alter, inspect, repair, remove, relocate, change the size of and abandon in place pipelines desired by the Grantee for the transportation of water, together with all of the rights necessary and convenient for the enjoyment of the rights, privileges and easements hereby granted. As used herein, the term "pipeline" shall also include such surface or subsurface pipeline, appurtenances, and facilities as may be necessary or convenient, in the judgment of the Grantee, for the operation and/or maintenance of any such pipeline.. The precise centerline of the easement is to be determined in the discretion of the Grantee and the centerline of the pipelines as installed shall establish conclusively the center line of the easement herein conveyed. The width of the easemient shall be fifteen (15) feet, consisting of 7.5 feet on each side of the center line. The Grantee shall have the Light of ingress and egress over - the Grantor's land at Qonver.ient points for the exercise of the rights, privileges and Easements herein granted, By acceptance of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee covenants and agrees to Indemnify and hold the Grantor harmless from liability for damages, injuries or otherwise, whether to Grantee, its agents or others, caused by fault or negligence of Grantee or its agents while on the Grantor's land. The Grantor covenants and agrees not to construct or erect or permit the erection or maintenance of buildings or structures of any kind on, or change the elevation of ground within, said fifteen (15) foot easement without the written permission of the Grantee. By acceptance of this Deed of Easement, the Grantee covenants for itself, its agents, successors and assigns .hat whenever entry is made upon the lands of the vrantor for any purpose described in or related to this easement, that the lands of the Grantor shall thereafter be restores; to substantially the same condition as existed prior to such entry. Vermont Federal Bank, FSB, by executing this Deed of Easement, releases from the security and lien of its Mortgage :idted March 24, 1987 and recorded in Volume 24 at Page 436 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein and also releases from the security interest in a Loa: -option Agreeriont obtained by Cli'e4 Page 415 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein. In all. other respects, the security and lien of the Mortgage and Assignment to the Lease -Option Agreement of Vermont Federal Bank, FSB shall_ remain in full force and effect. The Howard Bank, N.A., by executing this Deed of Easement, releases from the security and lien of its Mortgage dated October 10, 1991 and recorded in Volume 311 at Page 517 of the South Burlington Lard Records, the Easement Deed described herein, and also releases from the security interest of a Collateral Assignment of Leasehold Rights dated October 10, 1991 and recorded in Volume 311 at Page 528 of the South Burlington Land Records, the Easement Deed described herein. In all other respects; the security and lien of the Mortgage and Collateral Assignment of Leasehold Rights of The Howard Bank, N.A. shall remain in full force and effect. The City of South Burlington, by executing this Deed of Easement, releases any rights it may have in the 20 foot wide sewer easement and in the roadway which is the subject of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. John Larkin, Gerald C. Milot and the Larkin--Milot Partnership, Lessees under a Lease -option Agreement dated May 29, 1985, as evidenced by a Memorandum of lease -option Agreement dated June 1, 1985 and March 25, 1987 and recorded in Volume 217 at Page 412 and Volume 217 at Page 476, respectively, of the South Burlington Land Records, as amended, by executing this Deed of Easement hereby consent to this Deed of Easement. In all other respects, the Lease -Option Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. TO HAVE AND TO FOLD, the aforegranted rights and easements, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging, unto and to the use of said Grantee and its successors and assigns forever, to it and their own proper use, benefit and behoof. The foregoing shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respectivg successors and assigns of the Grantor and the Grantee. ' Dated at , 1992. IN THE PRESENCE OF: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY, ss. , Vermont this James J. Fayette day of At , in said County, this day of , 1992, James J. Fayette personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and subscribed, to be her free act and deed. BefoFe me Notary Public Dated at _ 1992. Vermont this day of VERMONT FEDERAL BANK, FSB By: Its Duly Authorized Aqent STATE OF VERMONT CHYTTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At in said County, this day of , 1992, a duly authorized agent of Vermont Federal Bank, FSB, personally appeared, and acknowledged this instrument, by sealed and subscribed, to be free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Federal -Bank, FSB. Before me Dated at _ , 1992. MW STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. Notary Public Vermont this day of THE HOWARD BANK, N.A. By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At in said County, this day of 11 1992, _, a duly authorized agent of The Howard Bank, N.A., personally appeared, and acknowledged this instrument, by sealed and subscribed, to be free act and deed and the free act and deed of The Howard Bank, N.A. Before me Dated at _ 1992. Notary Public Vermont this day of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ay: Its Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At , in said County, this day of , 1992, , a duly authorized agent of the C ty of South Burlington, personally appeared, and acknowledged this instrument, by sealed and subscribed, to be free act and deed and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Before me Notary Public Dated at Vermont this day of LARKIN-MILOT PARTNERSHIP By: Its Duly Authorized Agent John Larkin .Gerald C. Milot STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, ss. At , in said County, this day of , 1992, John Larkin drtd Gerald C. Milot, individually, and , duly authorized agent of the Larkin-Milot Partners h p, personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument, by them sealed and subscribed, t•o hp tboir free act and deed and the free act and deed of the Larkin-Milot Partnership. Before me i-i -ed Notary Public R R EXH1131T "A^ 1175 SiiELBURNE ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VEi2MOWT A vacant parcel of land, consisting of 34.8 acres, more or less, and situated on the westerly side of Shelburne Road, and being adjacent to 1117 Shelburne Road, so-called. I Being all and the same land and premises as conveyed to James J. Fayette by the following documents: 1. Quitclaim Deed of Philip F. Fayette, dated April 2, 1985, and of record at Volume 211, Page 7, Of the City of South Burlington Land Records; 2. Warranty Deed of Joseph A. Solomon and John J. Barone, Co -Trustees of the Fayette Family Trust under a Trust Agreement dated November 30, 1979, and recorded in Volume 288, Page 358, of t-be City of Burlington Land Records, said Warranty Deed dated April. 12, 1985, and of record at Volume 211, Page 469, of the City of South Burlington Land Records; 3. Administrator's Deed of Isaac N.P. Stokes, Administrator of the Estate of Frederick J. Fayette, Sr., dated April 12, 1985, and of record at Volume 212, Page 257, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. The parcel herein conveyed is more fully described in a Warranty Deed from Frederick J. Fayette, Philip F. Fayette, James J. Fayette and Gabriel Fayette to Fayetteco, Inc., dated June 6, 1969, and recorded in Volume 91, Page 138, of said Land Records, EXCEPT land conveyed to I?er_cules Supply Corporation dated November 13, 1970, and recorded in Volume 96, Page 175, of said Land Records. By ,judgment- Order of Chittenden Superior court dated December 22, 19R2 tG EXlSt LipOri revoCaLlc)ii Lt`. itS Cti itEi i)y Lhk;� `6cC:rf;'tary of State on October 15, 1973, at which time the property and assets of Fayetteco, Inc. became vested in its stockholders, Frederick J. Fayette, Sr., ,Tames J. Fayette and Philip F. Fayette, as tenants in common. Said Judgment Order is of record at Volume 13'i, Page 373, of the City of South Burlington Land Records_ Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned deeds and records, and to the deeds and records contained therein, in further aid of this description. SIGI.LLL.S/abl of PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, July 28, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Revised preliminary plat application of Dorset Land Company LUr jl1 Lt11`v'isivia vi ^f 11,93 ar ces of land into two (2) parcels L ) of 11.64 acres and 0.29 acres, and 2) construction of a planned commercial development on the 11.64 acre parcel consisting of 156,000 square feet in five (5) buildings for medical office, general office, cafe/deli, and retail (pharmacy) use, 421 Dorset Street. 2. Final Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totalling 25,750 square feet for automobile sales and service, 1095 Shelburne Road. 3. Revised Final Plat application of John and Joyce Belter to adjust the rear lot lines of lots 10 - 19 of the 36 lot single- family subdivision known as White Rock Point located north of Country Club Estates, Poor Farm Road. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission July 11, 1992 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant JWJ REALTY 2 ) Name of Subdivision JWJ REALTY 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application NONE 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: start construction August 03,1992 complete construction June 15,1992 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and containing all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regulations for a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for a major subdivision. (Signature) applicant or contact person Date City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658-7958 e July 7, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Please submit revised plans no later than Friday, July 10, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si4cely, 2Ra J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp cc: Stephen A. Vock !A 4 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Preliminary comments on October 27, 1992 agenda items Date: October 13, 1993 SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, SHELBURNE ROAD Plans for the above referenced project dated June 1992 with latest revision dated 8/18/92 are acceptable. P.J. AUTO VILLAGE, WILLISTON ROAD Plan dated August 1990 with 9/28/92 revision prepared by FitzPatrick-Llewellyn is acceptable. MERRILL'S SHOWCASE, WILLISTON ROAD 1. The theater expansion may be in a fill area. 2. Plan prepared by Mike Dugan dated 10/5/92 is acceptable. VEVE ASSOCIATION (DORSET LAND COMPANY), DORSET STREET Plan dated 1/6/88 prepared by Trudell Consulting Enginers is acceptable. Memorandum - Prelimi..ary Comments July 28, 1992 agenda items - Planning June 24, 1992 Page 3 --- plan should show existing vegetation on the site. --- proposed curb cut will be located approximately 20 feet westerly of an existing curb cut for the adjacent property. --- note #3 on plan states that the parcel is .93 acres and note at southeast corner of lot states the parcel is .92 acres, which is correct? AESCULAPIUS MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION_- 1 TIMBER LANE --- 111 parking spaces required and only 109 spaces are being provided. --- plan indicates 23 spaces along the row of parking immediately to the north of the building and staff counts only 22 spaces in this row. --- existing dumpster on site and any proposed dumpsters should be shown on the plan and should be screened. --- a traffic analysis should be submitted. --- indicate whether addition will have a basement and if so what it will be used for. --- provide the number of additional staff members and an estimate on the number of patients per day using the new facility. This information is needed to determine sewer allocation. --- provide details on existing and proposed exterior lighting. J.W.J. REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD --- Sheets S-1 and S-2 show a walkway where Sheet 1 shows a parking space in the double row of parking just south of the new building. Also, the handicapped space just west of this walkway is not shown on Sheet 1. --- the row of parking spaces along the stream is not the same on sheets S-1, S-2 and 1. --- Sheet 5 does not show the new vehicle storage area connection with the paved parking area as shown on the other sheets, also the parking layout is not the same as shown on Sheet 1. 3 Memorandum - Fire Ch1�f July 28, 1992 agenda items Page 2 4) SATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PROJECT #92135 SHELBURNE ROAD Plan has been reviewed by this department and all the corrections have been made which were asked for to enable us to give emergency protection if Needed. 5) DORSET LAND COMPANY, 00R.SET STREET, PROJECT #86090-50 DATED 7/1/92 Plan has been reviewed by the Fire Department and the following must be corrected if we are to give proper emergency protection. a) Building C, D, and E must have at least 30' between buildings. b) One more hydrant installed by building C, D, and E at a location approved by the Fire Department as well as all other hydrants on property relocated at least 40 feet from buildings. c) Should have a second way done to get to building C, D, and E. P \\�\\\\\\ ; \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\\ \\�y\\\\\\\\`\\\ t o -w.,r • \�\\\\\\\\ \\�\\\\\\ \\`�\\\\�\ \\\ \\ \\\ 81T[ oAT� ,. [%1tTIN0 WILDING /3,ON or `\\\\ \\\\\\ \ \ \\\ \\\. 3. WnoTAL wILDINo :=,0137 tt OW[RA09) I \ \ \ �� �• •�� 43 \.\\ \. ♦. ■"W'CWM PAM AREA ,=O.,=O BF (eT.ec OOVrR^*E) TOTAL6. (�) \`�\\\\\\��\\\\ �_ �_ �_ �_ �— \ t. TIT[AR[A =07l/07 tF (".7 �[t)O[) \\\ \ PARKIM W. KIRLINOTON OMM"LER LYWUTH urT1t1N of to. wRLlxoroN \\\� \ \ �� \\'\\ \ I \\\\���"���\ SHARED troRAt[ ,00 \\\\\\\Y\ \ \ \ I \ \\`,\\\�\` \ \\\ \ \\\\ \ :\\\\\\\� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ • \\\\\\\ \\ \\\ \ — -- WtN \ ll20 -014 NZ NNN \ \\\\\\\\\ \,�\ \11 IN N �N. N. \\ e SHELBURNE ROAD n n � SITE PLAN \\N• \� N. NNN \\ \-ti RECEIVED JUN 3 0 1992 Cityof SoBurlington . Eton Do Nor soAta DRAw.� NO. GATE REVISN)N SITE LAYOUT PLAN SAY M OF SOtAM NUFAR TOM SHELBURNE ROADSOUTH SURL I NGTOON • VT W�M—LA�HM�MSrMSOUTHPARK DRVE COCIES�EN VECOPYRIGHT O W AUNN—LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. SCALE T•' — 30•—O'• DRAWINO NO. DATE PROD —Y2 OS-30 CHECKED D� am S-2 PROJECT 020M City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 30, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed plead find a copy of the May 12, 1992 Planning Commission meeting minutes. if you have any questions, please dive me a call. S'n.erleL- J C e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl .TW MCp d- M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: J.W.J. Realty Saturn Dealership Application Date: June 9, 1992 On May 29, 1992 members of the Natural Resources Committee visited the site of the proposed Saturn dealership at 1095 Shelburne Road. It is our understanding that the applicant proposes to fill the stream area and pipe the drainage underground. It is the Natural Resources Committee's recommendation that any alteration of the stream and the Conservation and Open Space District is unacceptable for the following reasons: 1. The plan as proposed does not provide for any pretreatment of the surface runoff from a large paved area. This paved area will provide storage for a large quantity of automobiles which are known to leak contaminants including gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, brake fluid, etc. These containments would be directly discharged into -the stream and in a short distance into Lake Champlain. These contaminants will have a negative effect on the water quality of the stream and Lake Champlain. 2. The applicant's proposal will result in increased erosion downstream due to the increase in velocity resulting from the piping and the increased volume of surface runoff caused by the proposed development. 3. The proposed piping of the stream will reduce the amount of water available for the trees left on the adjacent property to the south. 4. The removal of the vegetation in some bird and small animal habitat. animal footprints along the stream and vegetated area. The CO District along creates a green corridor providing migration. 1 the CO District will remove There is evidence of small a small animal run in the either side of the stream a means for small animal 5. Keeping the vegetation in the CO buffer between this property and the units on the adjacent L&M Park property. District will act as a proposed 150 residential It is the Natural Resources Committee's understanding that the CO District standards do not allow any alteration of a watercourse in this particular circumstance. Section 3.307 of the zoning regulations which allows for alterations of watercourses only applies to those uses granted under Sections 3.10 or 3.20. The proposed auto sales use is not listed in either one of these sections as an allowed use. Joe Weith specifically asked the Committee to look at the erosion occurring along either side of the stream bank. It appears that this erosion is the result of steep slopes caused by filling to accommodate development on either side of the stream. The Natural Resources Committee suggests that the best way to reduce the erosion would be to plant some shrubs, bushes, trees, etc. on the banks which would hold the soil in place. Enclosed are copies of pages 4 and 5 of a memorandum sent to the Planning Commission by the Natural Resources Committee in 1975. This memo was prepared in response to a request by the Planning Commission to research and define minor streams and drainageways and to consider what should be designated as conservation zones. For all the above reasons, the Natural Resources Committee strongly urges the Planning Commission to not allow any alteration of the watercourse on the property or the cutting of trees in the CO District. The Committee commends the Planning Commission for requiring the adjacent L&M Park Project to maintain the integrity of this same stream. This is the standard that should be applied to all cases similar to this one. 2 0 South Burlington recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 usefulness of streams and drainageways. Second, open streams are more desirable than culverted water ways for several reasons. a. The advantage of an open stream is that some of the water can return into the ground for use by man and by vegetation. b. Open streams and drainageways permit aeration of the water by increasing the absorption of oxygen. This is natures own process for helping water recover naturally. (Man has learned to copy nature when he sprays and cascades his contaminated sewage water in an attempt to help it regenerate.) c. Generally no erosion occurs within the man made tubings or culverts, but mild to severe erosion frequently occurs at the end of such structure. Severe erosion will also occur when the volume of water exceeds the carrying capacity of the man made structure. Third, streams and drainageways are needed to provide natural green belts throughout the city. The need for green belts in urban areas has been well established (see also below for some of the major points). The difficulty centers on where to locate these green belts. Our own city went through exactly this same process of trying to determine how and where to obtain green belts necessary to maintain the quality environrent-.-of_South Burlington. While_ the city is doing what it can to correct the oversite and lack of planning in the already developed portions of the city, its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations were adopted to see the future development provided for these necessary open spaces to keep South Burlington from becoming just another asphalt jungle. To this end it has required set backs from highways, controlled removal of existing trees, established regulation for buffer zones and green belts and established a Conservation Zone to protect streams and drainageways, their banks, wetlands, wildlife habitate and other natural resources. The establishWent of conservation zones along streams and drainageways was infact a solution to several problems. It assured the city that the waterways would remain unobstructed for reasons of health, safety and welfare and at the same time provided the needed green belts. If as a consequence certain portions of land have a large number of drainageways and streams it is not unjust to require the fixed set backs because in effect this is simply stating that same land is better for development than others. Forth, the benefits of green belts are many. a. Aesthetics The Planning Cossmission is well aware that the better builders attempt to leave trees near their more expensive houses and that lots which M. 49 i South Burlington Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLING i ON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 have both treed and untreed area. Oh,-_ larger and more expensive houses are--the--ones-that-are-bui-It on the treed areas. .Those of us who buy house sites without trees or green spaces around, ;:sually attempt to grow shrubs and trees and develop our own green space. :ile we may not all agree on ghat trees or shrubs or flowers we want, it is almost universally accepted that green belts are aesthetically desireable. b. Temperature Modification Green belts serve to make both the hot weather and th-_cold weather more bearable. This is easily descernable in the heat o.' summer as the evaporation of water through the leaves (transpiration) lower:, the tem-oarature around the -area. This temperature drop can be of the order of 15 degrees Fahrenheit. In the winter the trees act as a wind break end provide the insulating effect of dead air space. c. Improves the value of the adjoining areas. The best known example of this is the value of land on the perimeter of Central Park in new York City. It is equally true around the Coa.^ons in Boston, or along Fairmount Park or Pennypack Park in Philadelphia or around National Monuments like Valley Forge or Getteysburg Battlefield. E i d. Noise Absorption Green belts that are large enough to support trees can reduce the noise level by absorbing the sound energy in the same way that curtains absorb sound in a theater or auditorium. This is related to the area of the leaf surface. (Ex=ple - Step from noisey Dorset Street through the small grove of trees leading to Middle School the traffic noises are greatly attenuated. 5. Oxygen Regeneration The role of plants in oxygen regeneration is well known and is expressed by the formula CC2 + B20 + photosynthesis equals sugars and 02. 6. Wind Barracade Green belts which contain trees are an effective wind barracade. 7. Wildlife Eabitate E 5• 45 MW7/.14,- I f l�.. � ,:,.G �„�.P fir-• � s j�- PLANNING COMMISSION 12 May 1992 page 3 Mr. Handy said the motel would be 2 stories over the restaurant. A question arose as to building height as the second building would be 3 ft. too high. Mr. Woods felt it could be lowered. Traffic would enter from Shelburne Rd. and exit onto Swift Street which would also have an entrance. There would be 96 parking spaces. The building would be tudor-style with a flower garden between this property and the neighbors. It will have an in- door swimming pool. Mr. Weith noted there is a problem as to whether this is considered one or two buildings. Since it is a non -conforming building, if it is ruled to be one building, it would fall under the 25% rule for alterations that applies to all construction. If it is considered to be two buildings, it doesn't meet the p.u.d. requirement for lot size (4 acres). Mr. Weith said he ice„ �Y� — -bt }ding fee g r� aAd pa 3 g� ,o hanged.- h_ considering it one building because it is joined at the second level. Mr. Burgess said it can't be considered one building to meet one criteria and two buildings to meet another criteria. It has to be one or the other. Mr. Weith said he could ask the Zoning Administrator to explain his decision. Members suggested tabling the item until the Administrator explains his decision. Mr. Craig moved to continue the hearing until 9 June 1992. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of two buildin s totalin 21,800 sq. ft. for automobile sales and service, 1095 Shelburne Rd. Mr. Savoie said they are planning a Saturn car dealership. Their first consideration was to break up the "sea of parking" look, so they created an access drive. This will be 30 ft. wide and will run back from Shelburne Rd. to the Saturn building. It will create several smaller parking areas. They have hidden the larger parking lots behind the Chrysler -Plymouth building. Mr. Craig noted that the parking lot in front removed the grass buffer the Commission is striving for along Shelburne Rd. and asked that the first two parking spaces be removed. The appli- cant said this would be OK. The applicant would upgrade the facade on the Chrysler -Plymouth building and will create a plaza effect in front with customer parking. He then showed the Saturn Building concept which is similar to all of their other dealerships. They are very con- cerned with landscaping and will line the access road with 3" caliper trees. They will also save many of the good oaks and maples in the back area which will then be graveled. PLANNING COMMISSION 12 May 1992 page 4 There is a question of whether the remaining (non -conforming but grandfathered) sign will remain or whether a new siyn (conform- ing) will go up. The applicant said they have not yet decided on this, but whatever they do, they will abide by all require- ments. They understand the Ordinance. The main entrance to the Saturn building will be under a canopy. There will also be a drive-in access to the service area. Mr. Sheahan suggested trading off some of the green space in the back for some in front. He felt it would be to the applicant's benefit as it would improve the appearance in front. Other mem- bers agreed. Utilities: The municipal sewer line will be brought in from the back of the building via. an 8" line that will tie in with the 12" line from L&M Park (this negotiation is now taking place). There will be 2 new hydrants with a 6" service to the back of the builidng for the sprinkler requirements. The site drainage will be a combin- ation of overland flow and closed drainage system. Mr. Weith raised the question of a Conservation Zone problem and outlined the area in question on the plan. The applicant con- sidered this a drainage Swale, but Mr. Weith noted it is 15 to 20 feet deep and clearly fits the definition of a minor stream as it has a very well defined channel and is filled with water some parts of the year. The applicant noted if they cannot fill this in, they cannot interface with the L&M property and this will have customers going out onto Shelburne Rd. more frequently instead of directly to the L&M complex. Mrs. Maher asked what damage will be caused from a conservation point of view if the channel is filled and/or culverted. Mr. Weith said it would increase the velocity of the flow and also preclude the natural cleaning ability of the grassed swale. Members felt they would like to get input from the Natural Re- sources Committee, which, Mr. Weith advised, is reviewing the plans. Mr. Sheahan said he would be uncomfortable making any exception in this case when the Commission set a strong precedent with the adjacent property. Mr. Ausin noted that by widening the driveway, this access is no longer lined up with the traffic light. Mr. Savoie said this is PLANNING COMMISSION 12 May 1992 page 5 being reviewed by the Agency of transportation and they will abide by the Agency's decision. Mr. Burgess said they will also have to abide 6y what the Planning Commission decides. Mr. Weith said he would talk with the City Engineer about this. Mr. Burgess noted the major issue would be the Conservation Zone. He asked Mr. Weith to share the thoughts of the Natural Resources Committee with the applicant. 7. Site Plan application of Eric Fleggenheimer, dba EMA, Inc., for use of a vacant 7,680 sq. ft. building for retail sales, 300 Dorset Street: Mr. Burgess noted this is the old Alco Building. Mr. Duffy said the major issue will be that of alterations to a non -conforming building in the City Center. The lot is just over an acre and goes back to San Remo Drive. The existing building is 7,680 sq. ft., made of steel with metal siding. The existing parking is paved to the back of the building and then there is a gravelled lot behind. The applicant proposes to remove the existing shed on the property. There is already a drainage system in place. There is a chain link fence on the south side of the building which belongs to Merrill Transit. Mr. Duffy noted this building lines up with the other non -conforming buildings on dorset St. They would use the 30' curb cut planned by the Dorset St. project. The primary tenant in the building would be The Net Result, with additional retail tenants in the rest of the building. Lighting would be mounted along the fence to the south. They propose to extend the driveway back to San Remo Drive and will bring a service drive to the north side of the building. The question is what can be done to rehab the building. The applicant had originally planned a major facade rehabilitation and the moving of doors and windows. After talking with city personnel, they have backed off from this plan and will use the existing structure with no alterations. What they do want to do is replace the existing doors and windows. The zoning admin- istrator has ruled that this cannot be done because of the special requirements of the City Center Zoning. Traffic: Mr. Duffy said they used the "specialty retail center" criteria of ITE to compute allowable traffic and arrived at a total of 270 vehicles over a 6-day period with 60 cars per pm peak hour (based on 240 cars per weekday). Mr. Burgess asked if these are cars or trip ends. The applicant acknowledged these figures are for cars. Mr. Burgess then noted that would double 4�B PA111 'i State of Vermont �r Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist Natural Resources Conservation Council Jeffrey Savoie J.W.J. Realty, Inc. 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Hazardous Materials Management Division 103 South Main Street/ West Building Waterbury, VT 05671-0404 802-244-8702 June 2, 1992 RE: Petroleum contamination at South Burlington Chrysler, 1095 Shelburne Road, South Burlington (Site #92-1207) Dear Mr. Savoie: The Sites Management Section (SMS) has received a tank pull form indicating petroleum contamination at the above site. Although there are two underground storage tanks (UST) in the vicinity, only one was excavated. This tank was determined to be in good condition by Bryan Schultz of K-D Associates, Inc. There was 72 cubic yards of petroleum contaminated soil excavated during the UST removal and it was stockpiled on site. Although the excavation was 9 feet deep, no groundwater was encountered. However, the levels of soil contamination were high enough to indicate a potential for groundwater to be impacted. Based on these facts, the SMS requests that you retain the services of a qualified consultant to perform further investigation into the source, degree and extent of contamination. Although no groundwater was encountered during the excavation the SMS feels the groundwater in the area should be tested for contamination. Since the tank was in good condition, there is a possibility that the contamination originated from a piping or dispenser leak or from the waste oil tank located on the north side of the building. Therefore one monitoring well should be installed in the area of the excavation, and one in the area of the waste oil UST. The consultant should also develop a remediation plan for the stockpiled soil. The groundwater from the monitoring wells will need to be tested using EPA standard tests 8240 and 418.1. If the wells are found to be contaminated above state standards, then additional work will be required to determine the extent of the contamination. This work will most likely involve installation of additional monitoring wells. Additional work will also be required if the soil in the area of the waste oil UST is found to be contaminated. This will include but is not limited to removal of the tank and excavation of any contaminated soil. r Please have your consultant submit a work plan detailing the above requirements within 10 days of receipt of this letter, so the SMS can review and approve it. Within 60 days of approval, please have your consultant submit a summary report of the work performed, including an analysis and copy of soil and groundwater test results as well as any recommendations for treatment. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, arles B. Schwer, Supervisor }Sites Management Section cc: South Burlington City Council CBS: PG\Chrysler. let City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 25, 1992 Stephen A. Vock Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Saturn Dealership, 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Vock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on June 23, 1992 allocated 150 gpd to J.W.J. Realty for construction of a 12,247 square foot building. This building is to be used for automobile sales and services. This building will be served by the City's Bartlett Bay Treatment P facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. JW/mcp 6 S•n rely J e Weith, City Planner The applicant should be required to post a 3-year landscaping bond in the amount prior to issuance of a building/zoning permit. Also prior to permit, the applicant should have to submit to the planner a letter form BIA which indicates the type, size and number of landscaping species to be planted on airport property and an indication of the general location where landscaping will be installed. The cost of the plantings and their installation must equal at least $1,800. Lighting: No new lighting proposed. Sewer: The sewer allocation for this project is 60 gpd. This is based on four (4) additional employees. The $2.50 per gallon fee would have to be paid prior to permit. Other: Two (2) existing dumpsters will be screened with a six (6) foot stockade fence. 3) J.W.J. - REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD This project consists of constructing a 12,247 square foot building (9,147 feet on 1st floor and 3,100 square feet on 2nd floor) to contain a new auto dealership on the site of an existing Chrysler -Plymouth dealership. Auto sales is neither a permitted nor a conditional use in this district. The Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a use variance for this facility on April 13, 1992 and the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan on May 12, 1992 (minutes not yet available). This property at 1095 Shelburne Road is within the Commercial 1 District. It is bounded on the north by a cemetery and undeveloped land owned by Pomerleau, on the west by the undeveloped residential portion of L&M Park, on the south by the commercial portion of L&M Park, on the east by a retail building and Shelburne Road. The applicant has submitted an alternate plan for the Planning Commission's consideration. This alternate plan retains the integrity of the watercourse and CO District along the southern boundary. Access/Circulation: This property is currently served by a 30 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road which is proposed to be widened to 60 feet at the property line. Section 19.103b limits the width of a driveway to 36 feet unless a different) size is required due to special circumstances. City Engineer Bill Szymanski was consulted regarding the width of this curb cut. He felt this width was acceptable in order to accommodate the new car delivery trucks. In the past, Baldwin Avenue was used for unloading new cars. Approval from AOT would be necessary for this curb cut widening. This access is 2 at a signalized intersection directly across from Baldwin Avenue. Traffic circulation on the site is acceptable. Coverage/Setbacks: Building coverage is 10.9% for both the original and alternate plan (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.5% for the original plan and 69.2% for the alternate plan (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 30% for both plans (maximum allowed is 30%). The new building will meet setback requirements on both plans. Landscaping: The landscaping requirement for this project is (� $12,900 which will be met by both plans. Plantings on the original plan will include Sugar Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Russian Olive, Paper Birch and Sargent Juniper. Plantings on the alternate plan will include Sugar Maple, Redmond Linden, Allegany Serviceberry, Paper Birch and Sargent Juniper. Staff recommends that maples be planted along the Shelburne Road R.O.W. on the south side of the driveway as is proposed �Wll on the north side. Parking: The existing facility requires 27 parking spaces and the proposed facility requires 25 parking spaces. These required spaces are being provided including five (5) handicapped spaces. A total of 375 parking spaces are being proposed for the entire site on the original plan and 374 spaces on the alternate plan. The two (2) parking spaces along Shelburne Road which the applicant agreed to eliminate at sketch plan are not being eliminated on either plan. C.O. Zone: The original plan shows the piping and filling of the watercourse along the south boundary. The Natural Resources Committee visited the site with this plan in mind and submitted written comments (see enclosed memo). The alternate plan will not encroach any further into the C.O. 0 zone than currently exists and the watercourses will be left �. undisturbed. �5 Staff concurs with the recommendations of the Natural Resources Committee. The watercourse meets the definition of minor stream as provided in the zoning regulations, and in staff's opinion meets the spirit of the original intent of the CO District. Therefore, the watercourse should be protected and the requirements of the CO District maintained. Traffic: This property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate a total of 155.7 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The trip 3 -if generation analyses submitted by the applicant estimate a total of 100 vte's during the P.M. peak hour of the adjacent street on a weekday. The current trip generation for this property. is 41 vte's. t The proposed dealership will increase trips generated by 59. _5 i' The applicant will have to contribute $1,515 to the Shelburne Road Traffic Impact Fund based on the 59 additional trips , generated. , Sewer: The sewer allocation for this project is 150 gpd based�'� on 10 new employees. The applicant will be required to pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. Lighting: Lighting for the project will consist of the following: W. 0 C. 11 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires (1 light per pole). The alternate plan fewer poles. 16 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires foot poles (2 lights per pole). 14 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires on seven (7) 24 foot poles (2 lights per pole). nn on 24 foot poles�/� will have two (2)/ on eight (8) 24 D. 3 - 400 watt metal halide luminaries on 24 foot poles (1 light per pole). It appears the lighting plan will be creating intense lighting of the property. The applicant should address how this will impact adjoining land uses, in particular, the future residential neighborhood to the southwest and Shelburne Road. It would be helpful if the applicant could provide staff with examples of similar lighting designs and intensity in the area so we may observe its impacts. Other: - One (1) screened dumpster is proposed for the new facility. - The distance and bearing on the westerly boundary is missing from sheet #1. - The final plat should show the drainage easement which crosses the property and which was previously granted to the city as> -el- shown on the plan filed in the land records. - The Fire Chief and City Engineer have reviewed the alternate plan and find it acceptable. - Sheets 1, S-1, and S-2 do not show the exact same parking` layout, number of spaces and location of handicapped spaces. All these plans must be identical. 4, MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: J.W.J. Realty Saturn Dealership Application Date: June 9, 1992 On May 29, 1992 members of the Natural Resources Committee visited the site of the proposed Saturn dealership at 1095 Shelburne Road. It is our understanding that the applicant proposes to fill the stream area and pipe the drainage underground. It is the Natural Resources Committee's recommendation that any alteration of the stream and the Conservation and Open Space District is unacceptable for the following reasons: 1. The plan as proposed does not provide for any pretreatment of the surface runoff from a large paved area. This paved area will provide storage for a large quantity of automobiles which are known to leak contaminants including gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, brake fluid, etc. These containments would be directly discharged into the stream and in a short distance into Lake Champlain. These contaminants will have a negative effect on the water quality of the stream and Lake Champlain. 2. The applicant's proposal will result in increased erosion downstream due to the increase in velocity resulting from the piping and the increased volume of surface runoff caused by the proposed development. 3. The proposed piping of the stream will reduce the amount of water available for the trees left on the adjacent property to the south. 4. The removal of the vegetation in the CO District will remove some bird and small animal habitat. There is evidence of small animal footprints along the stream and a small animal run in the vegetated area. The CO District along either side of the stream creates a green corridor providing a means for small animal migration. 1 5. Keeping the vegetation in the CO District will act as a buffer between this property and the proposed 150 residential units on the adjacent L&M Park property. It is the Natural Resources Committee's understanding that the CO District standards do not allow any alteration of a watercourse in this particular circumstance. Section 3.307 of the zoning regulations which allows for alterations of watercourses only applies to those uses granted under Sections 3.10 or 3.20. The proposed auto sales use is not listed in either one of these sections as an allowed use. Joe Weith specifically asked the Committee to look at the erosion occurring along either side of the stream bank. It appears that this erosion is the result of steep slopes caused by filling to accommodate development on either side of the stream. The Natural Resources Committee suggests that the best way to reduce the erosion would be to plant some shrubs, bushes, trees, etc. on the banks which would hold the soil in place. Enclosed are copies of pages 4 and 5 of a memorandum sent to the Planning Commission by the Natural Resources Committee in 1975. This memo was prepared in response to a request by the Planning Commission to research and define minor streams and drainageways and to consider what should be designated as conservation zones. For all the above reasons, the Natural Resources Committee strongly urges the Planning Commission to not allow any alteration of the watercourse on the property or the cutting of trees in the CO District. The Committee commends the Planning Commission for requiring the adjacent L&M Park Project to maintain the integrity of this same stream. This is the standard that should be applied to all cases similar to this one. ZI V South Bu.-zinc ton Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 usefulness of streams and drainageways. Second, open streams are more desirable than culverted water ways for several reasons. a. The advantage of an open stream is that some of the water can return into the ground for use by man and by vegetation. b. Open streams and drainageways permit aeration of the water by increasing the absorption of oxygen. This is natures own process for helping water recover naturally. (N.a.n has learned to copy nature when he sprays and cascades his contaminated sewage water in an attempt to help it regenerate.) c. Generally no erosion occurs within the man made tubings or culverts, but mild to severe erosion frequently occurs at the end of such structure. Severe erosion will also occur when the volume of water exceeds the carrying capacity of the man made structure. Third, streams and drainageways are needed to provide natural green belts throughout the city. The need for green belts in urban areas has been well established (see also below for sc:..e of the major points). The difficulty centers on where to locate these green belts. Our own city went through exactly this same process of trying to determine how and where to obtain green belts necessary to maintain the*&uality environment -of -.-South Burlington. While_ the city is doing what it can to correct the oversite and lack of planning in the already developed portions of the city, its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations were adopted to see the future development provided for these necessary open spaces to keep South Burlington from becoming just another asphalt jungle. To this end it has required set backs from highways, controlled removal of existing trees, established regulation for buffer zones and green belts and established a Conservation Zone to protect streams and drainageways, their banks, wetlands, wildlife habitate and other natural resources. The establishWent of conservation zones along streams and drainageways was infact a solution to several problems. It assured the city that the waterways would remain unobstructed for reasons of health, safety and welfare and at the same time provided the needed green belts. If as a consequence certain portions of land have a large number of drainageways and streams it is not unjust to require the fixed set backs because in effect this is simply stating that some land is better for development than others. Forth, the benefits of green belts are many. a. Aesthetics The Planning Commission is well aware that the better builders attempt to leave trees near their more expensive houses and that lots which B 4. 49 South Buranb on Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 Ilia �R have both treed and untreed area.the larger and more expensive houses are—the—one-s—tha- - are-bui- t on the treed areas. Those of us who buy house sites Without trees or green spaces around, :-sually attempt to grow shrubs and trees and develop our own green space. :bile we may not all agree on what trees or shrubs or flowers we want, it is almost universally accepted that green belts are aesthetically desireable. b. Temperature Modification Green belts serve to make both the hot weather and th_ cold weather more bearable. This is easily descernable in the heat o.' su=.er as the evaporation of water through the leaves (transpiration) lower the terxrature around the area. This temperature drop can be of the order of 15 degrees Fahrenheit. In the winter the trees act as a wind break and provide the insulating effect of dead air space. c. Improves the value of the adjoining areas. The best known example of this is the value of land on the perimeter of Central Park in new York City. It is equally true around the Coons in Boston, or along Fairmount Park or Pennypack Park in Philadelphia or around National Monuments like Valley Forge or Getteysburg Battlefield. p t d. Noise Absorption Green belts that are large enough to support trees can reduce the noise level by absorbing the sound energy in the same way that curtains absorb sound in a theater or auditorium. This is related to the area of the leaf surface. (Ex=ple - Step from noisey Dorset Street through the small grove of trees leading to Middle School the traffic noises are greatly attenuated. 5. Oxygen Regeneration The role of plants in oxygen regeneration is well known and is expressed by the formula CC2 + H2O + photosynthesis equals sugars and 02. 6. Wind Barracade Green belts which contain trees are an effective wind barraeade. 7. Wildlife Eabitate E 5. 4`9 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. �§uut� Burlington Hire Department 5i .�• ..Lf Yi�il �il eel -,�)ntttb Nurlingtan. Vermont 115403 SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY JUNE 23,1992 AGENDA ITEMS MONDAY JUNE 8,1992 { F • (802) 658-7960 HERTZ BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NEW OFFICE STORAGE BUILDING PLAN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM I SEE IS THE EXISTING HYDRANT MUST BE RAISED AND A GATE INSTALLED TO ALLOW US THE USE OF THE HYDRANT IF NEEDED. 2. SATURN OF SO. BURLINGTON PROJECT # 92135 SHELBURNE ROAD PLAN HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE WHICH WERE ASKED FOR TO ENABLE USE TO GIVE EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF NEEDED. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: June 26, 1992 Preliminary Comments Date: June 10, 1.992 HERTZ, BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Plan prepared by Michael Dugan dated 12/5/91 and revised 5/26/92 is acceptable. ATURN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. SHELBURNE ROAD 1. Sidewalk along Shelburne Road shall be constructed on the r.o.w line entirely on the north side of entrance and skewed to the r.o.w. line south of the drive where the control boxes are in 0 the way. 2. A 15 foot easement shall be obtained for the water line where NIA t it will be installed on private property. It shall be shown on the plans. ems= 3. Plans dated April 1992 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates are well done and they are acceptable. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 19, 1992 Mr. Gary Lavigne 30 South Park Drive Colchester, VT 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 SHelburne Road Dear Mr. Levigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, June 23, 1992 at 7:30 PM to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S cere y, J e Weith City Planner JW/peh \ \\ \\\ \\ \FM I I I I f RL SU \ \\ \ \ \ su su •�� \RL RL 0 SHELBURNE ROAD SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE NIEY OOINOR NAIL SOTAKICAL KAM 112E OTT REk"Wal COST EA. TOTAL r NOAR MAPLE A..r ....A.rr 1 3' 120 1 W 1 300.00 I 5.000.00 RL REMIND LINDEN TI11. w M1. 3' 1J W 300.00 1 3.900.00 M ALLEOAKY SERVICLINDSNY ANI.nNI.r 16..18 1 Vl'-1' 3 W 1TS.00 620.00 P• PAPER SIRON D.W. ►"Yrll.r. S'-10• 1 CI OI 3 YIR. W 100.00 ]00.00 N IIAROEKf JUNIPER J..INr.. .A1-1. .. r0.nt 11 R SAL. 01 1'�l' QACIM 36.00 1,510.00 0 BUOLEWEED A).0. r.Pt— .' POTS 00 11' OACIID 16.00 000.00 RECEIVED JUN1 6 1992 City of So. Burlington 00 NOT SCAN IRIAIYIMOS NO. I DATE LANDSCAPE PLAN SAIVRN OF SOUTH IN010.0fRA. OW SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE — COLCHESTER, VERMONT COPYRIGHT O WIEUANN-1AMPHERE ARCHrrECTS. INC. SCALE 1^ — W-0^ DRAWING NO. DATE PROD 00-15-92 S DRAWN BY RJL CHECKED BY OOL PROJECT 92010 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. R O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-22- 1 CHARLES R. DUNHAM P—id—I STEPHEN A. VOCK Vk. Pr"id.nt JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM April 6, 199Z Tr. ww RECEIVED Mr. Gary Lavigne APR 7 199? Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive WIEMANN - LAMPHER Colchester, Vermont 05446 ARCHITECTS Re: South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dear Gary: As I mentioned during our telephone conversation, according to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations for maximum trips, the South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dealership is allowed a.total gross floor area of approximately 26,000 square feet. It is important to note that the traffic generation charts in the South Burlington regulations are based upon the 4th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The 5th Edition of the manual is based upon a substantially larger study group and shows a significant decrease in the amount of trips generated from an automobile dealership. Since we do not have the 5th Edition in our office, I asked Roger Dickinson to summarize the estimated trip generation calculations in a letter (see enclosed). If you should need any additional information prior to your meeting, please let me know.- - - Sincerely, \ Stephen A. Vock SAV:pao Enclosure STUDIES • DESIGN a INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING 9 LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY 8 WATER FOUNDATIONS d STRUCTURES CONCRETE d SOIL TESTING 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 1-4AMOUREUX & STONE — Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 3, 1992 Mr. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 RE: Trip Generation Analyses South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dear Steve: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 054 (802) 524-5245 APR 06 1clo? Ci."i! A+-Srwi;�trs, Ip.'. As requested, we have developed a projected trip generation estimate for the proposed expansion of the South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth new car dealership. As we understand the existing facilities at this location, they include 13,500 gross square feet (gsf) of building floor area on a 4.75 acre lot. The proposed expansion will add 9,000 gsf of new building floor area, bringing the total on the existing lot to 22,500 gsf. This location falls within Zone 4 of the Traffic Overlay District, as outlined in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Zone 4 includes those lots which access onto a high -volume roadway segment via a signalized intersection. Referring to Table III of the Zoning Regulations for new car sales, a maximum building size of 5,000 gsf is allowed per 40,000 square feet of lot size i^ Zo; a 4. Fcr this lot, that is equi:�alen! to a maximum building floor area of 25,864 gsf. Since Table III of the Zoning Regulations uses the 4th Edition of Trip Generation as a reference, and that has been superseded by the 5th Edition published in 1991, we double-checked the existing and projected trip generation of this project using the current edition. In the 5th Edition of Trip Generation, the data base for new car sales (Land -use Category #841) has been considerably expanded. Whereas the 4th Edition had only two studies on which to base its weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation rate, the 5th Edition now has 20. This allows for a much more reliable estimate of the vehicular trip generation Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering . Planning • Land Surveying Mr. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. April 3, 1992 Page 2 for this land use. Table 1 presents the resulting estimates of the existing and proposed peak hour vehicular trip generation at this location. TABLE 1 Peak Hour Vehicular Trip Generation (vte/hour) Existing _ Proposed Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Weekday - P.M. Peak Hour of Adj. Street 17 24 41 25 37 62 Weekday - P.M. Peak Hour of Generator 15 18 33 25 30 55 Saturday - Peak Hour of Generator 20 20 40 34 33 67 Zone 4 of the Traffic Overlay District allows a maximum of 30 vte/hour per 40,000 square feet of lot size during the peak hour. For this lot, that is equivalent t 55 vte/hour. All of the above proposed peak hour trip generation estimates are substantially below the allowed maximum for this lot. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, �(3� 1 �.,;� '✓'ten -GM Rog r Di kinson, P.E. r/vock.rjd curl - 1 7-92 W ED 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont osd52 (802y V6.4450 1 3 =?4 CEA Consulting Engineers, Inc, 27 Nlgh Strout St. Albans, V¢rr»ont 05470 M02) 524•S24S Mr. Stbven Vock, RE, Civil Engineering Asa; elates, Inc, P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 June 16, f m Post -It' brand fax ffranVnittal memo 7M r or p•pn* ► From one For r. .x # 1�r7-- RE: Revised Trip Genoratlon Analyses South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Ah Dear Steve, As ro uested, we have recalculated the propossd trip generation for a 12,250 sq, ft, expansion of the existing facllltles at South Burlington Ohry filer/Plymouth. Previous analyses have used a 9,000 sq. ft, expansion. Additionally, the udditional trip generation of this expansion is being calculated teased on its being a free-standing auto dealership. A 12,254 sq, *ft, facility Is estimated to generate 38 vte/hour during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent s1r9et traffic, as opposed to 30 vte/hour fora 9,000 sq. ft. facility. With the existing facilitles an this lot generating an estl,-nated 41 vte/hour during the same time period, the new grand total becomes 79 vte/ho.tr, As calculated in our latter of April 3rd, the Traffic Ovorloy Ustrict ailows a rnaximum of 155 vta/hour for this lot. We thank you for this opportunity, to be of service. Should you have any questlons or If we may be of additionni assistance, please feel free to contact us. r/9223voo1.rJd 5inc:er©iy, Rog r ),Ck;nson, RE, Post -it" brand fax transrnittal memo 7671 1#01poges Clvll, Environmental & Transport CO' ' t - Co. C c - (Dept: Phone p Fax w r� �'� � �-t � �s Fax 11 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 66 PEARL STREET P.O. BOX 108 ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05453 802 658-3004 April 30, 1992 Mr. Stephen A. Vock Civil Engineering Associates P. 0. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Vock: In regard to the expansion to South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth, I have reviewed the trip generation analysis submitted by Roger Dickenson. I found his trip generation estimates to be consistent with the 5th Edition of ITE's "Trip Generation" in using the combined gross square footage of both buildings as a single generator. In this case, however, it may also be appropriate to view the new dealership as an exclusive generator and calculate the total trips as the sum of two parts. This increases the proposed totals for p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic by 24 vte/hour (rate) and 30 vte/hour (equation). The other two periods of analysis are unaffected. If you have any questions, please call me at 658-3004. Sincerely, Todd E. Landry Assistant Transportation Engineer TEL:bf cc: L'Joe Weith ... Serving the Municipalities of ... Bolton Burlington Charlotte Colchester Essex Junction Essex Town Hinesburg Huntington Jericho Milton Richmond St. George Shelburne So. Burlington Underhill Westford Williston Winooski F/t.fj yk-d= r 1.LS �(- a6 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) Name of Applicant JWJ Realty 2 ) Name of Subdivision JWJ Realty 3) Submit Subdivision Fee 90.00 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) : 4.76 acres, 1 lot, commercial, 13,500 s . f . existing auto dealer; 9,147 s.f. 1st floor; 3,100 s.f. 2nd floor; new auto dealer and site work 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: NO CHANGE 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Civil Engineering Associates - Shelburne Steve Vock - 985-2323 Paul E. Marcotte b. Surveyor d. Plat Designer Sames as engineer 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: NO CHANGE 1 B) List names and.mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: SEE ATTACHMENT 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary maps) accompanying this application: SEE ATTACHME T 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings b ) Landscaping c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work 1 0 00 'c�Di O©C7 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out) : SEE SUBMITTED LETTERS A.M. Peak hour P-M. peak hour Average daily traffic % of trucks 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City. b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of propertY lines, structures, watercur se5f wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 2 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start e and completion dates): Start Summer 1992 Complete Spring/Summer 1993 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: Apnroval of two bullldings for Commercial Complex (19.65(b)) 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, -those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. (Signature) applicant or contact person 4 JWJREALTY MAY 14, 1992 ATTACHMENT TO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LIST OF OWNERS OF RECORD James Fayette, et al. 1930 Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Burlington Mall, Inc. Pomerleau Real Estate 69 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 C&S Wilkins 11 Elosom Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Nicholas and Sara Pappas 1908 Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 James and Debra Wessen 1110 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 11, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, Fire Chief Goddette and myself. Also enclosed is a memo to the Planning Commission from the Natural Resources Committee. Please submit the additional information requested and/or revised plans by no later than Tuesday, June 16, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinc ely, c Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Encls RJB/mcp MEMORAUDUM To: Project Files p.6 From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - June 23, 1992 agenda items Date: June 10, 1992 HERTZ OFFICE/STORAGE ADDITION - BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT --- due to the increased building costs the landscaping requirement is now $1800. The applicant will be required to post a 3-year landscaping bond in the amount prior to issuance of a building/zoning permit. Also prior to permit, the applicant will have to submit to the planner a letter from BIA which indicates the type, size and number of landscaping species to be planted on Airport property and an indication of the general location where landscaping will be installed. The cost of the plantings and their installation must equal at least $1800. --- see Fire Chief's comments --- plans submitted are acceptable. J.W.J. REALTY - SATURN DEALERSHIP - 1095 SHELBURNE ROAD --- survey plat should be revised to show name and address of current owner. --- survey plat should show drainage easement which crosses the property which was previously granted to the City of South Burlington. --- the site plan should show the 10 foot easement to GMP shown on the survey plat. --- as suggested by the Planning Commission at the last meeting and agreed to by the applicant, the front two (2) parking spaces should be replaced with lawn area. 1 Preliminary Memo - Planning June 26, 1992 agenda items June 10, 1992 Page 2 --- parking requirement for new facility is now 25 spaces based on 12,247 square feet of gross floor area. Note on sheet S- 2 should be revised accordingly. --- the Roger Dickinson trip generation assessment dated 4/6/92 was based on a 9,000 square foot building and the building is 12,249 square feet, this report should be revised to account for this size building. 2 I LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GIDLON KING HOUSL 35 KING sruu- P O_ BOX 2I6 BURUNGTON. VERMONT 05/102-0216 THOMAS F. HERMANN TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN FAX a (802) 864-4650 MART I. SIGLER AR1l IHR SCO1T BARRLT-F. IR. TODD D. SCHLOMBERG May 15, 1992 Mr. Charles Hafter, City Manager 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: J.W.J. Enterprises - South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth - Saturn of Vermont - Shelburne Road Property Dear Mr. Hafter: We represent J.W.J. Enterprises and its principals. Our clients have asked us to write to you concerning the storm water runoff which has been and is being deposited on our clients' property by the roadways and improvements occasioned by development on the easterly side of Shelburne Road (Route 7) including, without limitation, city streets such as Baldwin Avenue and other improvements which are owned by the City of South Burlington. After reviewing the land records in the City of South Burlington, it does not appear from such land records that the City of South Burlington has the benefit of any explicit easement or other right of way permitting it to deposit storm water runoff on the southerly border of our clients' property. There is, of course, a deeded easement which permits the City of South Burlington to funnel storm water via an underground culvert from the City of South Burlington cemetery northerly of the J.W.J. property through that property to land owned by L&M Park. I will refer to this easement in some detail later. The absence of a deeded easement to the City relating to the water runoff that passes over the southerly portion of the J.W.J. property gives rise to the application of applicable Vermont legal principles concerning the right of an adjacent land owner to deposit water, such as storm water, runoff and other drainage, occasioned by artificial, i.e., not naturally occurring, conditions, improvements and developments on the adjoining land owners property. The law in Vermont on this issue is crystal clear: in the absence of an express easement or right of way, an upper property owner is prohibited from artificially increasing or altering the natural flow of water to a lower property owner. The Vermont Supreme Court recently affirmed this principle in Powers v. Judd, 150 Vt. 290 (1988). In Powers, the Court wrote: Mr. Charles Hafter, City Manager May 15, 1992 Page Two The law regarding the natural drainage of surface waters may be summarized briefly. Upper and lower property owners have reciprocal rights and duties as to surface water drainage. The upper owner has the right to have the surface water pass to lower lands in its natural condition. The lower owner must accept the natural flow of such waters upon his land. As a general proposition, an upper property owner cannot artificially increase the natural flow of water to a lower property owner or change its manner of flow by discharging it into the lower land at a different place from its natural discharge But, in cases involving only increased flowage and not a change in the place of discharge, an upper land owner may increase the flow as long as it causes no injury to the lower property owner. Id. at 292 (quoting Swanson v. Bishop Farm Inc., 140 Vt. 606, 610 (1982) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). In addition, where damage to the lower owner's property is repetitive in nature, injunctive relief is entirely proper to protect the lower landowner. Swanson, 140 Vt. at 610. In the present case, the improvements on the easterly side of Shelburne Road which are owned by the City of South Burlington and numerous others have both changed the place of discharge and increased the flow of water runoff. This altered storm water runoff has created an artificial stream that flows onto the southeast corner of the J.W.J. property toward the southwest corner, and has increased the accumulated discharge along the entire southerly border. The presence of this stream and accumulated discharge has caused direct injury to our clients by substantially limiting the uses to which they are permitted to put their property. Even if the City of South Burlington were to claim the right of a water course easement or other right to deposit this storm water runoff along the southerly border of the J.W.J. property, it is abundantly clear that, given current circumstances occasioned by the development by our client of its property, any such easement, at present, constitutes an unreasonable burden on the J.W.J. property and needs to be modified. In this regard, I emphasize that any such easement is by its very nature unspecific as to location and scope. Specifically, the development plans of our client to construct a parking area in the southwesterly quadrant of its property are unreasonably fettered and burdened by the storm water runoff. As I am sure you will appreciate, even assuming there is an easement to permit the passage of this water, the scope and extent of the easement must be tempered by the reasonable rights of the property which is burdened by the easement. Further, even if there were such an easement (and, as noted above, we have not been able to locate one in the land records), the scope and extent of the easement not being defined and established is always susceptible to adjustment and modification to balance and accommodate the needs and requirements of the "benefited entity" (here the City of South Mr. Charles Hafter, City Manager May 14, 1992 Page Three Burlington) and the developed property easterly of Shelburne Road and the burdened property, here J.W.J. Enterprises. There is, however, a deeded easement given to the City of South Burlington to permit the passage of water from the city of South Burlington cemetery northerly of the subject property through the J.W.J. parcel. This easement deed, dated November 13, 1970, is of record at Volume 96)at Pages 185-186 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. This easement explicitly provides for the passage of water through pipes and culverts, not through open water courses. Indeed, the recorded plan for this easement, recorded in Volume 82 at Page 240, graphically depicts a pipe through the entire J.W.J. parcel. Inexpliciably, the culverting work was never fully completed. Thus, the water which, by the terms of the above easement, was to pass through the property encapsuled entirely in a pipe or culvert system exits the piping and culvert that was installed some 30-35 feet from the southerly border of the J.W.J. property. This, too, adversely affects the use and enjoyment by J.W.J. of its property in contravention of the contemplation of the deeded easement. To resolve these problems, we do not seek any contentious solution. On the contrary, we propose a reasonable accommodation of the two competing interests. South Burlington has no defined easement along the southerly line of J.W.J.'s property, but the storm water runoff nonetheless runs over J.W.J.'s property. Further, the deeded easement that is of record has not been completed and used as the deed envisions. Even if one assumes the existence of a right by South Burlington and others to have some water runoff by the development adjacent to our clients' property to pass over that property, the critical need at present of J.W.J. to develop that portion of its property in the area where the runoff impacts it significantly tops the balance between these two interests in favor of J.W.J. J.W.J. needs to develop its land in the area where the runoff passes through the property. We firmly think these competing interests can be readily harmonized without resort to controversy. Accordingly, we propose giving and granting a deeded defined easement to the City of South Burlington to permit the passage of storm water runoff along and through the southerly border of J.W.J. property on the following terms and conditions. In the southwesterly quadrant of the J.W.J. property, the easement to pass the water would be through culverts buried in the ground, one culvert being 30 inches in diameter and the other culvert being 36 inches in diameter. The 36 inch culvert, which would be described by reference to a plat, would complete the work on the existing easement from the City of South Burlington cemetery entirely through the J.W.J. property in a southwesterly direction discharging the water onto the L&M property which the City presently enjoys the benefit of an easement. The other culvert which would also be identified by a plat would pass the water underground through a 30 inch culvert through J.W.J. property onto Mr. Charles Hafter, City Manager May 15, 1992 Page Four the L&M property. J.W.J. would do the necessary work to effect this at its own cost and expense. I am enclosing a copy of a site plan which shows the easements that I have just described. A relevant consideration in this regard is the fact that J.W.J. enjoys the benefit of an easement to drain surface water over the lands and premises to the south of the J.W.J. property currently owned by L&M properties. This easement, which benefits my clients' property, is in a deed dated November 13, 1970 and recorded in Volume 96 at Pages 175-176 of the South Burlington Land Records. Accordingly, the adjoining property owner to the south has, by written conveyance, accepted whatever burdens the easement we propose herein may impose. In making this proposal, there is no question but that the water which is being deposited on our clients' property is a water course created by storm water runoff. In this regard, we have reference to the opinion letter of the City of South Burlington's own consulting geologist, Wagner, Heindel & Noyes dated February 13, 1990, a copy of which is attached hereto for your convenience. In that letter, on page two thereof, Wagner, Heindel & Noyes explicitly conclude that the water passing across the property of my client and L&M Park is storm water runoff created by the development to the easterly side of Shelburne Road. This conclusively demonstrates that the water is created by an artificial, not natural development on the adjoining land and is not a natural "stream" as that term is commonly used. This evidence by the City's own experts triggers the legal principles which I have outlined above. My clients are prepared to forthwith, and at their cost and expense, prepare the necessary legal papers and do the necessary construction to install and implement the culverts and associated construction. Time is of the essence with respect to my clients' construction plans. As you are aware, J.W.J. plans to make improvements to the existing South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth facility and, in addition, to install a Saturn auto dealership on the property. Both Chrysler Plymouth and Saturn have made it abundantly clear that this development must proceed very quickly. Accordingly, I think under the circumstances it is reasonable to request a response from the City to this letter and to the proposal to grant a deeded easement for the storm water within fifteen days of the date of this letter. I hope you can appreciate that my client wishes to proceed in an amicable and professional manner concerning this. We are optimistic that this course of action will not be necessary and that the City will agree with our position that a deeded easement with defined, established parameters is by far the preferable method of handling this storm water problem rather than Mr. Charles Hafter, City Manager May 15, 1992 Page Four the current situation or any other alternative. In that regard, after you have had the opportunity to review our position and proposal, we would appreciate the opportunity to sit down with you on an informal basis to discuss the situation. Accordingly, we would appreciate a call at your earliest convenience to arrange such a meeting. Finally, in order to expedite matters, I am sending a copy of this correspondence with enclosures to the City attorney. Very truly yours, /0v�'7 //� Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:lb Enclosures: Report Map cc: Steven F. Stitzel, Esq. - Wacmer, Heindel, and Noyes, Inc. consulting geologists P.O. Box 1629 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1629 802-658-0820 February 13, 1990 Mr. Joseph Weith city of South Burlington Planning Office 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vt. 05403 Re: Evaluation of Impact on Minor Stream L & M Park Dear Joe: This letter is a follow-up to our meeting on February 5, 1990, regarding our firm's evaluation of a small watercourse west of Route 7 in South Burlington, and our assessment of the impact from the proposed L & M Park on that watercourse. First, we briefly discussed whether this particular watercourse meets the city of South Burlington's Zoning Regulations' definition of a minor stream (Section 21.133): "stream, water- course, or drainageway having a clearly defined channel with intermittent or full -year flow of water." Our discussion on this topic was brief, because we both agreed that there is no question that the watercourse in question meets this rather all-inclusive definition. As we also discussed, this definition seems unduly broad, since essentially any low point in the topography that carries water at any time of year, including the smallest of roadside ditches, or shallow swales between neighboring backyards, would meet this definition. Such a broad definition as this forces your office either to require extensive buffer strips on essentially all projects coming for your review, or to grant numerous waivers to this rule, or to ignore the rule completely. None of these options seem particularly palatable. An alternative might be to break this minor stream definition into two categories: 1. Minor Stream: A stream other than the three Major Streams specifically named in the Zoning Regulations, having a clearly defined channel, with flow for at least six continuous months of an average hydrologic year, and exhibiting aquatic ecologic characteristics of a stream supporting aquatic biota; I Minor Drainageway: A watercourse with intermittent flows occurring for less than six continuous months of a typical hydrologic year, serving primarily to convey stormwater and/or snow. melt, and exhibiting few aquatic ecological characteristics typical of a stream. I would envision these Minor Drainageways having less stringent requirements, such as: where possible and where appropriate, a 25' buffer strip from the center of the watercourse, or a 10' setback from the top of bank, or some such more realistic set of requirements. Regarding the specific watercourse in question (located south of the Chrysler -Plymouth Dealership, and north of the Vermont National Bank property), it appears to serve primarily to carry stormwater runoff from the drainage network emptying into the concrete culvert that outlets at the immediate west side of Rt. 7, and also runoff from the VNB and C-B properties and parking lots. This water is carried westward to a more substantial south -flowing stream that, in my mind, would be benefited by the 100' conservation zone (and would be classified as a minor stream in my definition suggested above). L & M Park has proposed a relocation of this smaller westward -flowing watercourse, to slightly north of its current route. I believe this channel relocation can be accomplished in a way that would provide the same functions that the existing watercourse now provides. Those existing functions are: 1. Hydraulics (the physical transport of stormwater); and 2. A limited amount of physical filtering of pollutants, by means of flow through a partially -vegetated water channel. Our work with the design engineers, Fitzpatrick-Llewelyn, Inc., would be to provide design parameters, and to review proposed design plans, so that these basic functions are met in the realigned channel. I do not feel that a full-blown aquatic ecological analysis of this small watercourse is warranted, given the relatively short length of proposed alterations (approximately 300 feet) and the present encroachment on a 100 foot buffer zone by -existing parking lots and buildings on the VNB and C-B properties. I would expect our involvement in this evaluation would entail expenditures of $1,000-$2,000, which would include preparation of these design parameters, several design review meetings with you and Fitzpatrick-Llewelyn, Inc., and possible attendance at Planning Commission meetings. In addition to those expenditures, we would need a more accurate topographic survey of this drainage swale and its surrounding banks. on my site visit to this location on January 26, 1990, it became apparent that the existing topographic map (based, I believe, on an original topographic survey by Hamlin Engineering) does not accurately reflect the location or depth rry's he water ci nel, nor the locations a topography of the ler-Plymouth building or parking lot. ro properly design In equally -functioning watercourse, an accurate topographic survey must be available as a base. As a separate_ issue, we would be glad to workment further with the Planning Commission to develop a ent definitions and buffer requirements for major and minor streams. Sincerely, Craig D. Heindel Senior Hydrogeologist CDH/c cc: Lance Llewelyn . , Before ore me, 5q Nar uerite J. Dohene Rotary Public Notary seal Received for record December 16th, 1953 at 11 A.M. Town Cl k EAS T._V ENT FREDERICK J., PHILIP F. , J:.MES J. AND GABRIAL J. FAYETTE TO RICHARD F. HAYDEN KNOW ALL '.-EN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT we, Frederick J. =ayette, of South Burlington County of Chittenden, State of Vermont, and Philip F. Fayette, James J. ='ayette, and sabrial J. Fayette, all of Burlington County of Chittenden, State of Vermont., in consideration of Ten and more dollars and otner valuable considerations paid to our full satisfaction by Richard F. Hayden of Essex Junction County of Chittenden, State of Vermont do hereby give,,,rant and convey unto the said Richard F. Hauden a certain easement over the property of the grantors herein as follows: A right to drain all of the surface water and a11. water from a lard drainat-e line from n..11 of the land now known as "Twin Orchards Park" and conveyed to said Richard..-iayder. by Facus J. rayette by 'Aarranty 'eed dated "arch 27, 1953, and recorded in .'olume 30, paye 554, t of the land records of the -'own of South3urlington, so t=,at said surface water and'drainag-e water shall . flow westerly under Shelburne :oad or across Shelturne ;oad at or• near the present culvert under said road and onto the land of said ,drantors which is situated westerly of said Shelburne `toad and westerly of said Twin Orchards Far•k. -11-is agreement to run with the land of said Grantors and to bind them their heirs and assi.-ns. IN ITYM3 WI-IME'OF, we hereunto set our hands and seals on this 24th day of March 1951+• In the Presence of: Catherine Clivs ;'rederick J. Payette Seal ::ar ara Fayette e james F ayette eul r:ii io . :ayette :>eal I Gabriel :ayette Seal State of Vermont County of Chittenden .t Burlington this 24th day of 1-arch, 1954 Frederick J. vayette, 1 Philip Fayette, James J. =ayette, and-abriel Layette personally appeared and they acknow- ledged this instrument by them sealed and subscribed to be their free act and deed, -efore me, Donald E. O'Brien otar , 1ublic Received for record Yar•>h 31, 1954 at 10-30 N -4, 47—,00 ip, Ilp --sac, dL RtCEIVED MAY 15 1992 n &AA2�PA jz ko S- ilooz- Vx Y Oo#L1,ov* 0 AL M A r 0 Av000 city of so. Burlimton -JrAL3-Z.4t4CrAAZr?MM k"-S TAX -JAI- lr/ZOAA- PZ-AAf. :..,De,4 W At -Sy - OAIA1-D- - 4.- 'At. C a Al s,41 t-.;r / A/ Q4 ,v Cg :1 I -All .4c s S A". x C, T. Pd'A Af. 77,1 r4 AD ------ /ZZEA-4. ry C 0 AL,42, =---,D -A 7G- ml .10 V 10 --210 KIt 0 AL ----A e jr Ak 0 11 rn 1� 10 ArAr 'A _j7&c Ay /0, AW or 0-iOz' IS 0.0 0 (::AA-A-s- A A140 - -------- - 'a ,OX ID 4 ,P4or A r 7H r2A.,V5 orO.QAA,-A PAD 2-0 (:,A 7/0 A-i -VI A& 14 'D r4 t4 lk 91Z 0 AZ- tL C WV 7A.IE y A.( /-A'- 41 z A" 4e OF V T. 7)-- CO PA L E. MARGOTTE ,No' 149 ,, SURV C; A r / 0 AJ 49 UR-14-IIE Z OA. P o. A X- A_40' C, A- J C. 6 ALA 0 "IA.IAEALI IAIC.. A Y FA �/h� LJ'L✓G L( CAM /2 � � � H Ce� 17 ➢r�' (0,'ll G z�l Z LAI T Memorandum - Planning May 12, 1992 agenda items May 8, 1992 P a,,, e.. 8 Other: --- a screened dumpster is being proposed. --- the applicant has not submitted a drainage plan as requested by Bill Szymanski. --- the applicant should address the concerns expressed at the 8/6/91 meeting with trucks with refrigeration units using the motel and running the trucks all night. --- applicant has indicated that --he has no problem in complying with the Fire Chief's recommendations. --- staff is concerned that the proposal is too dense for this site and perhaps should be down scaled for the following reasons: 1) A 38% waiver in parking is significant, motel and quality restaurant use tend to peak at the same time, 2) based on traffic study, traffic will increase threefold and exceed traffic overlay district, 3) a three story, 38 foot high, flat roofed structure will notbe compatible with adjoining residential homes. The applicant has indicated that he can obtain a parking easement from the adjoining Jennings parcel to meet evening peaks. Also, he has indicated that they will either lower the building to 35 feet or construct a 38 foot high building with a peaked roof-. Either of these would bring the building more into compatibility with surrounding buildings. Applicant has also suggested planting a cedar hedge on adjoining residential properties to lessen impact. If all of these are done, staff concerns will be satisfied. F,) J.W.J. REALTY - "ATURN DEALERSHIP = 1095 SHELBURNE_ROAD This projectconsists of constructing an 8,310 square foot building to contain a new auto dealership on the site of an existing Chrysler -Plymouth dealership. Auto sales is not a permitted nor conditional use in this district.. The Zoning Board of Adjustment. on April 13, 1992 granted a use variance for this use. `Phis property at 1095 Shelburne Road is within the Commercial ]. District. It. is bounded on the north by a cemetery and «ndeveloped land owned by Pomerleau, on the west by the undeveloped residential portion of L&M Park, on the south by the commercial portion of L&IM Pars:, on the east by a retail building and Shelburne Road. Memorandum - May 12, 1992 May S, 1992 Page 9 Planning agenda items Access/circulation: This property is currently served by a 30 foot curb cut on Shelburne Road which is proposed to be widened to 60 feet at the property line. Section 19.103b limits the width of a driveway to 36 feet unless a different size is required due to special circumstances. City Engineer Bill Szymanski was consulted regarding the width of this curb cut. He felt this width was acceptable in order to accommodate the new car delivery trucks. In -the past, Baldwin Avenue was used for u-nioad-ing new cars. - Approval from AOT would-- be necessary for this curb cut widening. This access is at a signalized .intersection directly across from Baldwin Avenue. Traffic circulation on the site is acceptable. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 10.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.5% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 30.7% (maximum allowed is 30%). The new building will meet setback requirements. Landscaping: The landscaping .requirement for this project is $12,900 which will be met.- Plantings will include Sugar Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Russian Olive, Paper Birch and Sargent. Juniper. Parkin:: The existing facility requires 27 parking spaces and the proposed facility requires 17 parking spaces. These required spaces are being provided including five (5) handicapped spaces. A total of 375 parking spaces are being proposed for the entire site. Traffic:- This property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 4 which would allow this property to generate a total of 155.7 vehicle trip ends (vt.e's) during the P.M. peak hour. TM9--traffic study submitted by the applicant estimates a total of 62 vte's during the P.M. peak hour of the adjacent street on a weekday. This trip generation was determined by combining the gross square footage of both buildings. Todd Landry, Assistant Transportation Engineer with the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission suggests that it would be more appropriate to "view the new dealership as an exclusive generator and calculate the total trips as the sum of two parts". Staff concurs. This method of calculation would bring the total trips generated to 921. r, 9 E Memorandum - May 12, 1992 May 8, 1992 Page 10 Planning agenda items The current trip generation for this property is 41 vte's. The proposed dealership will increase trips generated by 51. The applicant will have to contribute $1309 to the Shelburne Road Traffic Impact Fund based on the 51 additional trips generated. C.O. Zone: There is a minor stream crossing the property along the south boundary line from east to west. This is the same stream which drains onto the adjacent L&M Park property. The Plarming _-Commiss-ion in. reviewing ..the L&M -Park_ -development had considerable discussions regarding this stream and made a determination that it is a minor stream. The Planning Commission did not allow the stream to be altered and required that. the 50 foot buffer zone be maintained. The 50 foot buffers zone should also be maintained by this application. The plans presently show .tilling and piping within the CO zone. The preliminary plat should show the stream undisturbed and the boundaries of the CO -one. Sewer: The sewer allocation .for this project is 150 gpd based on 10 new employees. The applicant will be required to pay the $2.50 per gallon fee prior to permit. Li&hting.Lighting for the project will consist of the following: A. 14 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires on seven (7) 24 foot poles (2 lights per pole). 11 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires on 24 foot poles (1 light per pole). C. 16 - 1,000 watt metal halide luminaires on eight. (8) 24 foot. pales (2 lights per pole). D. 3 - 400 watt metal halide luminaries on 24 foot poles (1 light per pole) . Other --- two (2) screened dumpers are shown. --- at preliminary plat review, a survey plat will be required. --- Fire Chief Goddet.te finds these plans to be acceptable except for the main access drive which needs to be widened to 30 feet. 10 J N y—yC 1 ut I ) ; .iU lit I LI IHNN tNI IHN Hb�UU h HX NU. dULbb44bbU -P,U 1,Au' OFFICES �� l� ✓ r+ HEILMANN, EWAN & AsSC) (ATES. INC. THE CIDEON KINC I IOUSE 35 KING STREET BURLINCTON, vEG tO`. u54Q? 0?IG THOMAS F. Y.^_l:MAr.M 4HF.I jTQPrfCR A EKhtA1J 7klEfHQNF ft2i OGa-.2555 i802, 8c s.16% Mgrr l sicf kk AkTmuk ScDrr antra Tr, Ik MEMORAN_DtTM TON) o SCHLO"m[RC TO: South Burlington Planning Commission c/o Joseph Weith, City Planner FROM: Thomas F. Hellmann, Esq. DATE: June 9, 1992 RE: J.W.J. Enterprises - South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth - Saturn of Vermont - Shelburne Load Property This Memorandum will provide the Planning Commission with the current status of the above application. As a result of the meeting with Joe Weith; Steven Stitzel, Esquire, the City Attorney; any# Chuck Ha;Lter, the City Manager and in an effort to achieve resolution of the questions raised by the storm water runoff along the southerly portion of the J.W.J. property and the City of South Burlington easement that runs diagonally through the rear quadrant of the property, J.W.J. has decided to develop and present to the Planning Commission an alternate to the plan that was presented in the preliminary site review. The plan which we are developing will be an alternative to and not a replacement of the plan that was previously presented to the Commission. The alternate plan will not involve developinent on those portions of the property that are arguably Conservation or Open Space Districts. Although the alternative plan sacrifices some beneficial features that were in the initial proposal, its approval 4s not dependent upon resolving the currently open issues of the status of the conservation zone and the designation of storm water runoff as a minor stream. J.W.J.fs need to obtain permits to proceed with the project as expeditiously as possible prompts this alternate suggestion. In the event the Planning Commission, with the consensus of the City Council and City Attorney, can achieve resolution of the easement/conservation zone issue, J.W.J. would prefer to receive approval of its itr,itial submission. However, J.W.J. believes that the alternate plan fully complies with all applicable South Burlington regulations and concerns. JUN �G I Ut 1 !D; 31 tit 1 Lf1HNN tArIHN HtibUU MX NU, bU26b446by F. 03 South Burlington Planning Commission June 9, 1992 Page Two Itecognixing that we are on the Planning Commission's schedule for the June 23 meeting, J.W.J. requests a preliminary review of this alternative plan and further discussion with the Commission on the initial plan at that time. Thank you. Thomas F. Heilmann Attorney for J.W.J. Enterprises PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, June 23, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: Preliminary Plat application of J.W.J. Realty for a commercial complex consisting of two (2) buildings totalling 25,750 square feet for automobile sales and service, 1095 Shelburne Road. Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chair -man, South Burlington Planning Commission June 6, 1992 93 e h f✓ c v*2 s Tom- r} G,�✓n -( a e V'2 1't y ., t2f k¢ w�1� �v r OtL w� �j fiY1 S �e x/;— �sa ✓ l s 24oe-a,4n l i u (L���'�-c-� uc -r Gar i .�.._ 1S_.__ �Y a 1 a C L �,; . S ,,.� 1-u �, vo I ✓ l M E M O R A N D U M DRAr-,,T To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Natural Resources Committee Re: J.W.J. Realty Saturn Dealership Application Date: June 8, 1992 On May 29, 1992 members of the Natural Resources Committee visited the site of the proposed Saturn dealership at 1095 Shelburne Road. It is our understanding that the applicant proposes to fill the stream area and pipe the drainage underground. It is the Natural Resources Committee's recommendation that any alteration of the stream and the Conservation and Open Space District is unacceptable for the following reasons: 1. The plan as proposed does not provide for any pretreatment of the surface runoff from a large paved area. This paved area will provide storage for a large quantity of automobiles which are known to leak contaminants including gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, brake fluid, etc. These containments would be directly discharged into the stream and in a short distance into Lake Champlain. These contaminants will have a negative effect on the water quality of the stream and Lake Champlain. 2. The applicant's proposal will result in increased erosion downstream due to the increase in velocity xpsulting from the piping and the increased volume of surface fun —off caused by the proposed development. 3. The proposed piping of the stream will reduce the amount of water available for the trees left on the adjacent property to the south. 4. The removal of the vegetation in the CO District will remove some bird and small animal habitat. There is evidence of small animal footprints along the stream and a small animal run in the vegetated area. The CO District along either side of the stream creates a green corridor providing a means for small animal migration. 1 5. Keeping the vegetation in the CO District will act as a buffer between this property and the proposed 150 residential units on the adjacent L&M Park property. It is the Natural Resources Committee's understanding that the CO District standards do not allow any alteration of a watercourse in this particular circumstance. Section 3.307 of the zoning regulations which allows for alterations of watercourses only applies to those uses granted under Sections 3.10 or 3.20. The proposed auto sales use is not listed in either one of these sections. For all the above reasons, the Natural Resources Committee strongly urges the Planning Commission to not allow any alteration of the watercourse on the property or the cutting of trees in the CO District. The Committee commends the Planning Commission for requiring the adjacent L&M Park Project to maintain the integrity of this same stream. This is the standard that should be applied to all cases similar to this one.- 2 w:r..r..,:.:,w�ti;�:.,�9±;a..n+sh�t3��..vxr�Y.c6a�M-.ri:-:,sctv.,.r. -- •i South Buriinton Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 At the request of the Planning Cc=d ssion, Steve Page -approached the Natural Resources Comittee and asked the committee to research and define minor streams and drainageways and to consider what should be designated as conservation zcnes on the planning map. The inital effort was confined to the triangle of land enclosed by I-89, Williston Road and Patccen Road. In an attempt to obtain the best Possible information on streams and drainageways the Natural Resources Committee, represented by Doris Bailey and Bill Schuele met with 14r. Roland Whipkey, a federal hydrologist, and together -went on a field trip into the triangle area, on Saturday, November 22, 1975. -Because the.field trip with - Mr. Whipkey waa very enlightening it seems useful to review our field trip and summarize the discussion that went on. - The first stop was at the City's Jaycee Park. Parking'at the &nd of the parking lot, we walked down in a small, ravine north of the property. At this location we encountered an intermittent stream which on this day was flowing moderately. Mr. Whipkey was able to point out to us first, that this was an intermittent stream, that it was in good equilibrium with the surrounding terrain. A grassy stream bed indicated that there is not excessive run off, the bank of the stream was not undercut and the vege- tation had developed itself to stabalize the area and held erosion on the hillside to a minimum. When a stream is not in equilibrium, the vegetat- ion is removed in the stream bed and the banks are disturbed and show erosion. He showed us that by looking at vegetation at various levels of the bank, we could see the high water levels which an intermittent stream probably reached each year. High levels usually occur when a warming spell melts the snow cover and heavy spring rains occur. This phenomenon will occur almost every year. A less frequent but much more drastic flow of water occurs when the ground remains frozen and a heavy spring rain or storm occurs. In such a case essentially all the water that lands on the ground can not absorb any of the water. Since this phenomenon occurs sufficiently frequently in northern climates such as Vermont, it must be planned for in order to avoid severe flooding in developed areas. For a stream or drainage - way not in equilibrium with its environment, i.e. a stream which is destroying its own stream bed, at high water levels will carry along debris from its bank. This will then cling to shrubbery and tree branches which are inundated by the swollen stream, making it even easier to see where the high water level was. Feeding into this stream were several ephemeral streams which were soft and wet but without flowing water on this day. These were also in equilibrium with the hillside; inspite of a fairly steep hill, erosion was minimal. 11 1. 4-9 South Burlington Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 Using this ccmbination of ephemeral and intermittent stream as an example we discussed what would happen to the stream and drainageway if the top relatively flat land were cleaned and houses built on it. The hydrolo- gists observation which came as a shock to us was that the run off would go up by a factor of 10 times to 20 times the present. The ephemeral streams would erode away very quickly in this case because of the steepness of the hill, and once the vegetation cover was pulled out, almost none of the run off would be absorbed. The entire flow with the erosion particles would arrive at the stream. In this case, since the stream had a less severe grade, some of the silt would settle out; in the stream bed, kill the existing.vegetation by suff- ication and reduce its capacity to absorb any of the water. Depending on which of the ephemerial streams deposited the most silt, the region behind the deposits would spread out in an attempt to handle the larger amounts of water. These pockets of the stream tend to become the stagnent pools in which mosquitos breed. During the discussion about run off Mr. Whipkey used the term "tin roof area" which was a new one to us. He defined tin --roof area as the sum of the roof areas, paved areas, lawns, playing fields and courts. According to him, the volume of water which runs off of such areas equals 90 to 100�% of the precipitation which falls on it. In response to questions b'.r. 'Whipkey pointed out that contrary to what most people think, lawn areas do not absorb a large part of the precipitation, and in a heavy rain very little of it is absorbed. Mr. Whipkey agreed that to help us understand the calculations of run off he would locate the appropriate references which gave instructions on how to calculate yearly or 10 yearly peak run offs. (The details of this will be included in the appendix). From the Jaycee Park we went north on Patchen Road to abserve two perennial streams, oncd north of Kirby Road and one South of Kirby Road. These are both at the bottom of heavily wooded ravines, culverted where they run under Patchen Road. Both of these streams showed signs of fairly heavy flooding (probably in Spring and following storms) and showed under cutting of their banks. The increased erosive action produced by culverting of a stream can be seen by the impact the stream has on its banks on the down stream side of the culvert (west side of Patchen Road). Our next stop was behind the Holiday Inn where we viewed the area north and east of the motel. All three types of streams - perennial, intermittent and ephemeral could be seen in this rather extensive area. The depth and width of the ravines and gullies are a clue to the water carrying capacity in this terrain. The water retention on the area has been modified lately by the action of beavers. 0 South Burlington Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 While examining the waterways in this area Mr. Whipkey reminded us that the biggest pollution problem in the United States today is not air or chemical but sediment which clog streams, ponds, dams and lakes. The bulldozing off of the higher lands in this area to fill in the ravines and valleys is a typical way to produce stream clogging sediments which in this case flow toward I-89, the Winooski Fiver and ultimately in Lake Champlain. On December 2, 1975 the Natural Resources Committee met to discuss the field trip and to develop a definition of minor streams and drainageways. The Committee members agreed that the catagories of streams used by Mr. Whipkey perennial, intermittent and ephemeral would be useful in dealing with the question of what is a minor stream or a drainageway. A minor stream could be defined as a perennial and intermittent stream and a drainageway defined as a emphemeral stream. Also at the December 2nd meeting, the Natural Resources Committee reiterated its belief that set backs from streams and drainageways are very important. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to review the many purposes of set backs. First, setbacks provide adequate protection of streams and drainageways. The total amount of water that falls on South Burlingtons 10,000 acres must either be absorbed by the land or collected into the drainageways, streams, ponds, rivers and lakes._ Before man inhabited the area, a large part of that precipitation was gently absorbed by the land and the vegetation on it. As we cut the trees, built houses and buildings and paved areas, the land and vegetation available to absorb the water was reduced and more of it collected in the drainageways to worts its way to Lake Champlain and eventually to the Atlantic Ocean. 7ne crux of the problem is that the more we develop an area, the more we must be concerned with the drainageways. Drainageways will have to carry more and are more apt to give us problems in the future. What was once an occasional flooding of the back 40 acres suddenly becomes the flooding of a developments basements or the washing out of the city's road. We can not therefore be concerned only with the average amount of water that must be handled but in fact must be concerned with the maximum amount that a drainageway or stream will be called on to handle. In this regard it is of interest to note that both state and federal agencies use 100 year maximums. This concern for streams and drainageways and the recommended green belts associated with them is more than just aesthetics or beauty. Blocking of a normal water path in one location can very easily result in the flooding of someone else's property. This makes the streams and drainageways a natural resource in their own right. Good planning is necessary in order to maintain the full effective �{ • " South Burlington Recreation Department 1175 WILLISTON RD. ~'J SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 usefulness of streams and drainageways. Second, open streams are more desirable than culverted water ways for several reasons. a. The advantage of an open stream is that some of the water can return into the ground for use by man and by vegetation. b. Open streams and drainageways permit aeration of the water by increasing the absorption of oxygen. This is natures own process for helping water recover naturally. (Man has learned to copy nature when he sprays and cascades his contaminated sewage water in an attempt to help it regenerate.) c. Generally no erosion occurs within the man made tubings or culverts, but mild to severe erosion frequently occurs at the end of such structure. Severe erosion will also occur when the volume of water exceeds the carrying capacity of the man made structure. Third, streams and drainageways are needed to provide natural green belts throughout the city. The need for green belts in urban areas has been well established (see also below for sc=e of the major points). The difficulty centers on where to locate these green belts. Our own city went through exactly this same process of trying to determine how and where to obtain green belts necessary to maintain the quality environment -of-South Burlington. While the city is doing what it can to correct the oversite and lack of planning in the already developed portions of the city, its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations were adopted to see the future development provided for these necessary open spaces to keep South Burlington from becoming just another asphalt jungle. To this end it has required set backs from highways, controlled removal of existing trees, established regulation for buffer zones and green belts and established a Conservation Zone to protect streams and drainageways, their banks, wetlands, wildlife habitate and other natural resources. The establishment of conservation zones along streams and drainageways was infact a solution to several problems. It assured the city that the waterways would remain unobstructed for reasons of health, safety and welfare and at the same time provided the needed p- green belts. If as a consequence certain portions of land have a large number of drainageways and streams it is not unjust to require the fixed set backs because in effect this is simply stating that some land is better for development than others. Forth, the benefits of green belts are many. a. Aesthetics The Planning Commission is well aware that the better builders attempt to leave trees near their more expensive houses and that lots which J 4. 49 South Burlington secretion Ike artm p ent 1175 W I LL I STON R D. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 TEL. 802-863-2891 have both treed and untreed area. �qhe- larger and more expensive houses are-the—one3—thatare-built on the treed areas. Those of us who buy house sites without trees or green spaces around, ;sually attempt to grow shrubs and trees and develop our own green space. "=ile we may not all agree on what trees or shrubs or flowers we want, it is almost universally accepted that green belts are aesthetically desireable. b. Temperature Modification Green belts serve to make both the hot weather and th, coid weather more bearable. This is easily descernable in the heat o.' su=er as the evaporation of water through the leaves (transpiration) lower" the temxrature around the area. This tenparature drop can be of the order of 15 degrees Fahrenheit. In the winter the trees act as a wind break and provide the insulating effect of dead air space. C. Improves the value of the adjoining areas. The best known example of this is the value of land on the perimeter of Central Park in New York City. It is equally true around the Ccs=ons in Boston, or along Fairmount Para or Pennypack Park in Philadelphia or around National Monuments like Valley Forge or Getteysburg Battlefield. d. Noise Absorption Green belts that are large enough to support trees can reduce the noise level by absorbing the sound energy in the same way that curtains absorb sound in a theater or auditorium. This is related to the area of the leaf surface. (Ex=ple - Step from noisey Dorset Street through the small - grove of trees leading to Middle School the traffic noises are greatly attenuated. ) 5. Oxygen Regeneration The role of plants in oxygen regeneration is well known and is expressed by the formula CC2 + n20 + photosynthesis equals sugars and 02. 6. Wind Barracade Green belts which contain trees are an effective wind barracade. 7. Wildlife Eabitate E 5• ...,n . -,rn 4 period is selected by comparing the loss that would occur if the runoff exceeded the capacity of the structure to the cost of providing the addi- tional capacity. Terraces and terrace outlets are usually constructed for the peak rate of runoff to be expected in a ten-year design period. Di- version channels and stabilization structures vary widely in sire and in the damage whicli would result if they overflowed; consequently, the de- sign period selected may vary from a period of 10 years to 50 years or longer. .� Many methods have been developed for estimating the peak rate of runoff to be expected in a given design period (3). Empirical formulas have been widely used in the past but in most cases they evaluated only a limited number of the factors affecting runoff. Tables and curves giv- ing measured runoff from similar watersheds in the immediate area prove valuable if the measurements have been continued over a rela- tively long period and the gaged watershed is quite similar in all respects to the watershed under consideration. Prediction of runoff rates from an analysis of actual runoff' measurements from the watershed being con- sidered is probably the most accurate method but seldom, if ever, are runoff records of adegrtate duration available for the small watersheds usually considered in erosion control work. A prediction equation, similar to the soil -loss equation, has been developed by the author for estimating the peak rate of runoff from small watershed$. The equation is Q=QrXLXIX TXSX VX CXPXF where Q = peak rate of runoff, cfs Qr = peak rate of runoff from a watershed with a specific set of watershed conditions (Table 5.1) L = watershed location factor 5.5 I = soil infiltration factor F E'{ T = topographic factor t;.t S = watershed shape factor�-S V = vegetative cover factor f S!r C _ contour farming factor Zi P = surface storage factor F = runoff frequency factor Table 5.1 gives peak rates of runoff to be expected under a given set of conditions in in average ten-year period from various sires of watersheds located along line 1.0 in Figure 5.9. If the %watershed for which the peak rate of runoff is being estimated has conditions differing from those in Table 5.1, the values from the tahle are multiplied by an appropriate factor for the conditions that exist for the watershed being considered. #1b AV t� TABLE 5.1. Peak Rates of Runoff to Be Expected from Watersheds Acres Runoff, cfs Acres Runoff, cfs Acres Runoff, cfs 5 10 19 36 90 95 225 233 300 320 570 598 15 20 52 67 100 110 245 265 340 360 626 654 23 30 81 94 120 130 285 30t 380 400 682 710 35 40 107 120 140 150 322 340 420 440 736 762 45 50 132 14-1 160 170 356 �372 460 480 788 814 55 60 155 166 180 190 388 404 500 520 8.10 864 65 70 175 185 200 220 420 450 540 560 888 912 75 80 195 203 240 260 480 510 580 600 936 9G0 85 215 280 5.10 Note: The following conditions apply: ten•ycar frequency runoff; located along line 1.0, Fi3urc 5.9; soils with an average infiltration rate: as•crage land slope-8 per. i cent; a typical shape; in row crop, with crop rows planted across. the slope without terraces; and no appreciable surface storage. Figure 5.9. Values of the location factor, L. 84 CHAPTER 5 Location Factor, L. The rate of runoff is affected by the intensity of rainfall expected on the watershed. For locations other than along line 1.0 (Fig. 5.9), the value in 'fable 5.1 is multiplied by the appropriate factor from Figure 5.9. BMILIse of the wide variation in rainfall in- tensity expected in the mountainous areas of the ts'estern United States, the values of L for these areas arc not shown on the map. However, the value of L for these areas may be computed by determining the maxi- nium depth of rainfall in inches expected during a ten-year period for a rainstorm of thirty-ininute duration and dividing this value by 1.9. Soil hifiltration Factor, I. The rates of runoff given in Table 5.1 arc those expected from a soil witli an average infiltration rate. If soil con- clitions differ from this, the value from Table 5.1 should be multiplied by an appropriate factor I determined from the soil infiltration rate, For a listing of soils according to tlieir infiltration rate, see references 7 and 8. �Vith an infiltration rate that is- 1. Very higli (coarse -textured soils throughout), 1 = 0.8. 2. Above average (medium- to moderately co,u-se-textured surface soils and well -drained subsoils as evidenced by bright or nonmottled colors), 1 = 0.9. 3. Average (me(lium-textured surface soils and moderately fine -textured subsoils with restricted drainage as evidenced by having gray or mottled colors), 1 = 1.0. 4. Below average (medium -textured to moderately fine -textured surface soils with claypan or fragipan subsoils within 12 inches of the sur- face), I = I.1. 5. Very low (fine -textured surface soils or soils eroded into claypan subsoils), I = 1.2. TABLE 5.2. Topographic Factors T A%erage Land Slope (%) T 1 0.65 2 0.12 3 0.78 4 0.83 5 0.88 6 0.92 7 0.96 8 1.00 9 1.04 10 1.07 12 1.14 14 1.20 16 1.26 18 1.32 20 1.37 RAINFALL AND RUNOFF 85 Topograliliic Factor, T. The rates of runoff given in 'I'ahle 5.1 are those expected from land averaging 8 percent slope. If the avenge land slope on a wateislied differs from this, the value from Table 5.1 is multiplied by an appropriate factor selected from Table 5.2. 1Votershcd Sha(ic Factor, S. The shape of a watcishcd may be described by the maximum distance the runoff must travel in re.i(hin, the dis- charge point, including the distance that runoff travels in terraces and diversions. Locate this the in Table 5.3 opposite the watershed of the appropriate size and determine the shape factor S at the bottom of Table 5.3. Multiply the value front Table 5.1 by this shape factor. Vegetative Cover Factor, V. The rates of runoff given in Table 5.1 are expected if the entire watershed is in rote crops. If different covers are involved, the value in Table 5.1 should be multiplied by an appropriate factor selected from the following: urban areas, V = 2.0; farnisteads and suburbs, V - 1.2; small grain of good quality, V = 0.8; small grain of poor quality, V = 0.9; pasture of good qurtlity, V = 0.6; pasture of poor quality, V = 0.8; meadow of good quality, V = 0.5; meadow of poor TABLE 5.3. Watershed Shane Fa(tors S Acres '8faximum Distance Tra%cled by Runoff (R) 5 400 500 600 700 8W 900 1,100 1.") 10 500 550 600 700 800 950 1,100 1,300 1,600 1,900 20 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,900 2,300 2,800 30 800 900 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,900 2.200 2X0 3,100 3,600 40 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,900 2,200 2,600 3,100 3,600 4,200 50 1,100 1,200 1.400 1,600 1,800 2,100 2,100 2,900 3,100 3,900 4,600 60 1,300 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,100 2,400 2.700 3,200 3,700 4,200 5,000 70 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,300 2,700 3,100 3,600 4,100 4,600 5,400 80 1,500 1,700 1,900 2,100 2500 2,900 3,100 3400 4,400 5,000 5,800 90 1,700 1,800 2,000 2,300 2,700 3.100 3,600 4,100 4,600 5,400 6,200 100 1,800 1,000 2,200 2,500 2.000 3,300 3.800 4;100 5,000 5,700 6,600 120 1,000 2,100 2,100 2,800 3,200 3,600 4,100 4,700 5,400 6,"n0 7,100 140 2,100 2,400 2,700 3,100 3,600 4,000 4,500 5,100 5,900 6,700 7,600 160 2,300 2,600 3,000 3,100 3,800 4,300 4,800 5,500 6,300 7,100 8,000 180 2,500 2,900 3,300 3,700 4.100 4,600 5,200 5,900 6,700 7,500 8,400 2n0 2f700 3,100 3,500 3,900 4,300 •1,800 5,500 6,200 7,000 7,900 8,800 250 3,200 3,G00 4,000 •1,400 4,900 5,500 6,300 7,100 7,900 8,700 9,600 300 3,7U0 4,100 4,500 5,000 5.500 6200 7.000 7,70t) 8,500 9,400 10,400 350 4,100 4,500 4,900 5,400 6,100 6,800 7,500 8,200 9,000 10,000 11,200 400 4 500 4,900 5,400 6,000 6,700. 7r400 8,200 9,000 9,9W 10,900 12,000 450 -1,900 5,100 5,900 6.500 7,2n0 7.900 8,700 9,600 10,600 11.600 12,800 500 5,400 5,900 6,500 7,100 7,700 8,Q0 9200 10,100 11,100 12,200 0,606 550 5,900 6,100 7,000 7,600 8,300 9,000 9,600 10,700 11,600 12,900 14.300 300 6,300 6,900 7,500 8,100 8,800 9,50 10,400 11,300 12,400 13,700 15,100 Shape factor S 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 ,m ►t86 CiIAPTER 5 i quality, V = 0.7; timber of good quality, V = 0.4; timber of poor quality, V'_ O.G. Contour Farming Factor, C. The rates of runoff given in Table 5.1 are those expected from a watershed on which the majority of the crop rows are planted across the slope but not necessarily on the contour. If the entire watershed is farmed parallel to contour guidelines or terraces, the grade in the crop rows does not exceed 2 percent, and the crop rows dis- charge into grassed waterways, the value in Table 5.1 is multiplied by an appropriate factor (C): with 0-10 acres in the watershed, C _ 0.95; l 1-40 acres, C = 0.96; 41-100 acres, C = 0.97; 101-200 acres, C = 0.98; and 201-600 acres, C = 0.99. If only a portion of the watershed is farmed on the contour, the factor should be increased. For example, if 30 acres on a 40-acre water- shed are farmed on the contour, the contour factor C would be 0.97. Surface Storage Factor, P. Any water that is detained or impounded in the watershed reduces the peak rate of runoff. Values in Table 5.1 are peak rates of runoff expected from a watershed with no appreciable sur- face storage. If water is impounded on the watershed, the value from Table 5.1 is multiplied by an appropriate factor. The storage factor may vary, depending on the percentage of the watershed that drains into the impoundment, the amount of storage provided, and the location of the impoundment. Because of the wide variations in types of impoundments and the many possible locations on the watershed, it is impossible to give specific values for the storage factor that „vould be applicable for all situations.' The following general principles may be helpful in evaluating the storage factor: 1. Impoundments with only an emergency side spillway do not reduce the peak rate of runoff an appreciable amount, particularly if they sure expected to be full when the design storm occurs. 2. Impoundments with a principal spillway at a lower elevation than the entergellcy Spillway reduce the peak rate of Irunolf. The amount of reduction depends on the percentage of the watershed that drains into the impoundment, the rate of flow through the principal spill- way, the amount of storage provided between the principal and emergency spillway, and the capacity of the emergency spillway. 3. Impoundments located in the upper part of a watershed give the greatest reduction in the peak rate of runoff, those in the lower part give the least reduction, and impoundments throughout the witer- shed have an intermediate effect. 4. The effect of level terraces on the peak rate of runoff depends on the percentage of the watershed that is terraced and the amount of storage provided. RAINFALL AND RUNOFF 87 5. The effectiveness of natural storage such as lakes, swamps, and sink. holes depends on their location on the watershed, the percentage of the watershecl draining into them, and the amount of storage avail• able when the design storm occurs. In order to evaluate the storage factor on any given watershed con rectly, the design storm must be flood -routed through the impoundments on the watershed. ! Since all the information needed to flood -route the storm accurately is seldom available, the following procedure to deter- mine the effects of impoundments on the peak rate of runoff is suggested: 1. Determine the peak rate of runoff expected for the design period j from the area below the impoundments. 2. Determine the expected peak rate of runoff from the spillways of the impounding structures for the design storm. The procedure to follow is given in Chapter 9. 3. Auld the peak rate of runoff from the spillways to the peak rate of runoff from the area below the impoundments. This method ^asstinics_that the peak runoffs from the impoundments i and front the area below theta_ reach the discharge point at the same time. This seltlotn_ occurs,_particulatay if the impoundments are in the upper part of -the- ;vatetshed. Consequently the peak rate of runoff ob- tained by this procedure is usually somewhat higher than the actual peak. i Graded terraces. If the entire watershed is terraced, the storage fac- tor P can be selectgd from Table 5.4. Flowever, if only part is terraced, the factor should be increased. For example, if 80 acres of a 100-acre watershed are terraced and the terraces average 1,000 feet long, the storage factor would be 0.96. Runoff Frquency Factor, F. The values given in Table 5.1 are for the peak rate of runolf to he expected in at avera e ten-year period. If the peak irate of rtutoff for a dilh•rettt design fretiucncy is desired, the value front the table is tttultiplied by cite appropriate factor F as follows: for the peak rate of runoff expected in act average half -year period, F -- 0.2; r TABLE 5.1. Storage Factors for Graded Terraces P Acres in Average Length of Terraces (ft) Watershed 500 11000 1,500 0-10 0.95 ! 6.90 �0.80 11-40 0.97 0.93 0.85 41-100 0.98 0.95 0.90 101-200 0.99 0.97 0.95 201-400 1.00 0.98 0.06 401-600 1.00 0.99 0.97 88 v CHAPTER 5 1 year, F = 0.3; 2 years, F = 0.5; 5 years, F = 0.8; 10 years, F = 1.0; 255 years, F = 1.3; and 50 years, F = 1.5. Combination of Factors. For watersheds having a number of factors different from those specified in Table 5.1, the peak rate of runoff is de- termined by multiplying the value from the table by a succession of factors applicable to the watershed being considered. Cxn:nPle: Estimate the peak rate of runoff to be expected in a twenty -five-year period from a 120-acre watershed located in the south- east corner of Nebraska, and having the following characteristics: (1) Surface soil is moderately coarse textured with a well -drained subsoil. (2) Land slopes average 10 percent. (3) The runoff must travel a maxi- mum distance of 4,700 feet in reaching the discharge point. (4) Eighty acres of row -crop land in the upper half of the watershed are terraced. The terraces•average 1,300 feet in length. The crop rows are planted parallel to the terraces. (5) Forty acres of good quality pasture in the lower half of the watershed are not terraced. (6) 'There are no impound- ments except terraces on the watershed. Procedure: The appropriate factor for each term in the prediction equation is determined from the given conditions: location factor L = 1.03; soil factor (above average infiltration) 1 = 0.9; land slope factor T = 1.07; shape of watershed factor S = 0.90; vegetative cover factor (80 acres of row crops-1.0, and 40 acres of pasture--0.6) V = 0.87; contour factor (two-thirds of watershed is terraced) C = 0.99; surface storage factor P — 0.97; and runoff frequency factor (25 ),ears) F = 1.3. The peak rate of runoff (QT) for a 120-acre watershed from Table 5.1 is 285 cfs. Substituting in the equation— Q=QrXLXIX TXSX V X CX PX F Q=285X 1.03X0.9X 1.07X0.90X 0.87 X 0.99 X 0.97 X 1.3 Q = 277 cfs vxtrottu RA-res In the design of water management systetats it is sometimes necessary to determine the uniform rate that will remove a certain depth of runoff from a given area in a specified time. For example, what uniform rate of runoff will remove 2 inches of water from 10 acres in `forty-eight hours? A convenient rule of thumb (which is sufficiently accurate for most situations) to use in making this determination is 1 acre -inch per hour = l cfs In the above example, we were to remove 20 acre -inches of water in y 48 hours, or 20/48 = 0.42 acre•inch per hour, so the uniform rate of run- Y,'%� rtv off would be 0.42 cfs. tt ,r o� AG§v STATE OF VER.MONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION 133 State Street, Administration Building Montpelier, Vermont 05633 .A'p,9 tiSP0R'(P May 12, 1992 Stephen A. Vock Civil Engineering Associates Post Office Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: South Burlington, US 7 South Burlington Chrysler Plymouth Dear Mr. Vock: I have completed a review of your preliminary site plan and trip generation analysis for the above referenced project and offer the following. The existing pavement markings on the US 7 south approach are slightly different from what you have shown. Do you intend to change them? If the access is modified, as shown, existing loops will have to be replaced. I would suggest that the entrance lane for the dealership be 16 feet where it narrows. I would also suggest the northerly radius be 45 feet, so as to accommodate a WB 40 without encroach- ment on other lanes. One of the utility poles which need replacement is no problem, however, it may be quite a job to move the power pole as it also serves as a tap for Baldwin Avenue. Although we do not anticipate the increased traffic will have an adverse impact on the existing signal operation, we feel you should run a capacity analysis with the new traffic volumes. This signal is coordinated with those in either direction so we would prefer not to retime it. I have attached the record plan, showing timing, etc., for your use. Vermont is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Stephen A. Vock Civil Engineering Associates May 12, 1992 Page Two If you have any questions, please call me at 828-2653. Sincerely, Donald L. Allen Project Supervisor Utilities Section DLA:mw Attachment cc: City of South Burlington N Cc. blue i 1k°r 9...m I• zI 6 +1 llrunulGr�� � r,n ve I led •Way C T Z„ MIN / TYPICnL N Gb,ncf pcoi z' fle/n forte d Con re & 130 se for Goa se - MoLIn lee/ 2(o•'x46' C46mel Con +*-cller- C4bine45. Cast Qs1w ned Closs 6 • Concre.fe u)ifh s, s re,nrcrcln bars even) 'P'cc,6l,Ic+• spaced wilt, I I C-� 5 Y P Z' Mlmrnm unT Mln,mum Co nCrei(„' over the s+eel -3•, GaNDUT /NSrµLATICN w,rN 17rtl51'#N4 POLES POLE' WIT-0 No F— _�� L� ..„rrMcN;r.,ts EAIs7, NC. o0 E Zco�D." f nEa AIzl7,wll C."sTIN6 "mc - us[ WAA:a T1 NT au3,•„IO ST.—aft .STEA1 QANOS eoNDWT PN7L0a POLb ,HkY ExLt r,Nb GR0 FI'37,N6 IINO ONAER SASE PLATE .GROvT R£6RA•TEA A<7ER0:1 ,, „ 1 •. ••-.. . N,TOU7' CpNr IS INSTALLED 0 /!rN rnNUvlr / J NE �/ Co VO.,7 NOT TO 5CALE E<LT„'r, SnrAw eA-x C.-ST OF 716 A2OVE WOh!K SMALL. PF sU&�IOIAF-v To OrNGrt ST--mS Dora-6/c 24" 540 ,r� 93+28-• 930y1/ 152'tt Dura.h/e 4" Rerledoni cd Yellow bne s 93><'lsi,52'-••87'Lt (Double i) GEE NOTE Sou:!h Bur/ir�y�an Clrys/¢r- f'�ynaoui/� � I Ncw SIGNAL I.IrAD AReANOEN1ENr r—� ICY®�'��jj1 I®1 1_YN. IO� r©-1 O v7uNCTICN �Obl L-J 92 �26, tr 93«6/, P-T TRArFI C. S*NAL CoVDy/r 8,4towm Aw•- Cuaa ro 7twr/ON eaLTo Foa 2 COYSCCR on .- C6ez ro JVncrav am 7D ccwrA w--A; VENICLE LOOP Dc-rcc TDR. SALDw,N AvG•- 3- 6 x6's. Gt,,asLEC-tlwovrN De. 3"6 X&-1� Pius LOAD INS. � Mill"� ®� ■■■■■■■■■1.■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■■ ■MMMMMM■■IE�9■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■ ®®fJ■■■■■■10Ej0^J!■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■!INI■■■C■■■■■ ■■■■■ IuI� ©B®■■■■■■1®®0'a■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■ INIMM■MMM■M■ ■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI ■■■■■■■■ l�l�■ MONSOON1®■M■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■■INI ■ ■■■■■■ ® B®®■■I f:�■■■■■MINI■■=■■■■■MINI■■ ■■■■■■ L'�� :J�iF7®■■M■■■1 0�■■■■■MINI■■ ■■■■■■INI■■M■MM■M■ ■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■■ �® ® l�®BL■■■■■■1 ■■■■■■■M■I.i/■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■.■■■■■■ ®0�■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■■ NIM■ ■■■■■■ AOim■■■■■MINI■■M■MM■■M�NI■■�M■M■■■ P6©8©■■■■M■I mamm%mms�� ���■�����I����������1���uMINEMEN '�1 ■■■�■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■M■MMINIMMMM■■■M■ ■INES NI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■■ (1ip" b0©00ii■■■■IDot�O■■■■■■IG7■■■■■■■■■INI■■■�■ ONE CKpI©�■■■■■■IOODt�■■■■■■ ■■■ m■■■� ■■■■ N■■■■■ GI�■ ■■■■IODOGIM■��■■ ■■■■ m■■■■■M■■MINI■■M■M ■■Li■■M■■■■INI■■■■■■■■■_ NIMMM■■■MMMI ■MM■M■ ■■ MINN NI■■■■■■■■MINI■■■■■■■■ NI MMMMMM■MI�MM■MM■N■■ ■ _ SENSE NI 1�MMMMMMMMMIIMMMM © i O y P l u II i Repluce eA1S+Iny •thrL% OCrOW For o{} az°s nr/r/ Gnr�dwi(l s saa sl�aaes 13 6- F36 Ins/u// new coni,o//r anti a// I wilk -A,YrlyhftNrnGrrDW/ ncCes5or odd,llonGl eau, meni I 51 n t(4'K5')• /n a NEMH preWlred CE.b,nef 1 I Rer,r.Q /�c pr is Pole +/ SEE SHEETS 0163,"164 4245 — -4- Nores (.5[:.c veer la7 /ze Aw,noAI•IL NOrc S.) 1. ICCLO"r4 -"2 ¢ "6 FACCS 7o Covice 3 l S g SI/AdN . 2. CA,.rc sire. TAleu .ekvw Itwia ro 4,?CCN.$AtL /N FAlcs 2 e6. 3 FAca '°'S CNAN 5C G•iLCW AeEOW 70 eRCCN &AU- i O k0 - 17tArS AS FACIC 'r4• LGIrr i:•SrM PAW A•? WARRANrEo. 4. CA— leAzes AND Rc7►s!f 4NAj A—lt $,COWL /,e:Aas. 6 ZNSrMA CONDUIT.9 AS sNOWN. SEC 7113 S/rt-E% FL7e COVOU'r EN71?Y 020 POLGS DATUM =N-FALL JVAcrICN BCXF1 hj ypwN. VERTIUL �/ 7 Escrr,Ng w,,ec aerwcew cowR ew ANO SK,•NK rACt`3 MRIIOW4 Ai�fi .'WALL aE RCPLAG.ED. $ fic/ze-L', snN§ FG.rce SouRCE. E sf,Ng AL7ca Soctcr 70 ec 93# o_° °-0--0�0-0,8-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0•�0—o-0-0---ro—o—o— `� not /ns/ull /nlerCOnneGi' - See no/e 3-C on shec-• /.7 \vim►� -- -.-- 4. fir----i .—� .�_ 4• - ) O � -- Q< �i "try '—►' -- \ /Y� //5��2 oc�aycna/roc/¢s I � Typ,ml I I I� N I —._----- -- --. 4— - LEGEND ._ —� NEW SIGNAL FACE. �,M EXISTING SIGNAL FACE IRE ANLAR RELOCATED) 0-.> NEW PEDESTRIAN POLE B SIGNA /ro C to�{rOrr7 C17r�s /c- r D 1 . EXISTING FED, POLE 8 SIGNAL pl Inou ill b""t - Nof /9vadr We NEW STRAIN POLE W% SPAN WIRE OR MAST ARM y EXISTING STRAIN POLE W/ SPA WIRE (f15Sumed M,n,mum) 0.0 NEW PULLBOX OR JUNCTION BOX --'� --- 0A EXISTING PULLBOX N,rW989 o vcrr r-� --- NEW CONDUIT Ie day Naw /F EXISTING CONDUIT AM OFF D F 617ua +'p —Q — NEW AERIAL INTERCONNECT CA E >oo N3S 785 9e iss --- I —0 — EXISTING AERIAL INTERCONNE CABJ_E <s dS ss + —NEW BURIED INTERCONNECT ABLE +$ t EXISTING BURIED INTERCONNE CABLE �4..1 ® CDNTIkOLLVk cn8„JEr _ 9 IN„rALL rF.w .LY7ECrCR LccCs Ax JNOWN. I ♦,1, — CRau VS 7 WITN 40e.-I-A,>.IN•j V.A 7-8 4-- -1435. EXlst,nq S,clnal hEnd cirrr.nCTe-mcn+ /O ZeT.MN 9-RAIN RX.ES / SPAN WIA+t'. 1 / b �rp ller //• PAYCMC^l /M Akle#,* j ,.v,oWN oN TA/S -?eCr ARc I R li R Ex 15 ! Iny Cpn C7a,.•TN6 ANv AM /AVCA-Ofav cvj w: 76C 4v1i/N6L4 ./ Econol,/e - elecq"",ne SMALL Cl V11" ALL. AIMZe1Ag5. F,1-"—: AL» .0- McE I 1 Y 2•dlal ,-Fixed +1 AW,IRI^,f, CA' C/IMISLER- RYNIOvrN LAva AS.fNGWNF ZP I I G %NFY WcOi Nor- C><:vti AG F'AzT- CF" rNa- v926 fAW1,,, RZOTC-r. (�VI,-TIT'IES Nor INCL.,IDCO ON SN•SET nq) I , 1 SCRLE 1, Ini¢rseceion of U.S 7a, r�vISEO CITE • ... .� Br�DATE DRAWN BY 1 DATE TRACED BY lJF></ I DATE %,=•/ i ►ROJ./(.EGC-MNO. 6D00 (/J et VI C D 10 916E LKA SHEET Of /. .. II; ••1,, olio Tro{mac Siyna/ De�ur( SACct N 0 ILI I I I I e•..I« "A°aSYii•n \\��,\\. •1`,r 1'-y'.'� :i:[..•...•,:r:� I I I I I I L — 21 2, r� n 20 1 1 6 SHELBURNE ROAD (?" SITE PLAN ILI SITC DATA ,. [%I STI_ w=w 13,666 A 2. 1'11 mn wI LOIw 0.1 /7 Sr 3. OVSTOTAL DUILDIND 22.713 or (,O.SS OOVCRAOC) OPOQD ►RPAVED AREA 1.1.718 Or (e6.— OOVCRAOC) 6. TOTAL MIOPODCO(3 ) 1�1..16 Or (OO.OR OOVCRAOC) O. SITE ARCA 207.706 OF ({.76 AMES) P—IND SO. SI111LINGTON ONRYSLCR-�•L1StllRN fi�.km56wLw " a, SATT111W Or SO. 9 LINO- iiak/Di is 91ARED RTORADC ,00 RECEIVED MAY 15 1992 City of So. Burlington DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS NO. DATE REVISION WIT LAYOUTPLAN --A7Of SNM wedCNWM SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT �"1VM M 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE COLCHESTER. VERMONT COPYMGHT O WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHMEM. INC. 90ALE 1" - 30'-O" DRAWING NO. DATE PROD 06-11-92 DRAWN my RJL BY s-1 PROJECT 92019 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: May 12, 1992 Preliminary Comments Date: May 1, 1992 SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER - PLYMOUTH 1. The storm drain system crossing this property should be shown on the plans. 2. The "new vehicle storage area" is adjacent to City's Shelburne Road cemetery, a large healthy oak tree is very close to the cemetery line. This oak tree should be saved. This line should have substantial screening because there are burials close to this .line. A cedar hedge or a stockade fence is recommended. 3. A drainage plan shall be submited. 4. A sidewalk should be included along Shelburne Road. DR. SLACK PROPERTY, GILBERT STREET The record plan should show the drainage pipe in the area. If a portion of this pipe crosses the property a drainage eaement shall be given to the City. 350 DORSET STREET (ALCO BUILDING) 1. The entrance drive shall conform to the Dorset Street improvement plans. 2. The existing gravel area should be top soiled and seeded and maintained as a lawn. 3. The record plan should show the drainage system including the piping and discharge point. VE2/AOtIT F I I TO BE I/itPF�OVF=D /�� - \ IKiv o►-n Vie,^ __ _ _ _ _ 'k Y�� I — I r It2G nI 1 \ ' 1/1 ,Ib V I • tz.. LJ i i n // L71 � luv— Iq / �►�iin� M TI-- - - - - - - --��- I � F'oSEt_ LIIVt-M SIP 0 F x . rvi --!-III I HII ! !III !&Aw II I I D LU15 ki IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Od . . . . . . . . . . . . 11110 .......... ........ 1111111111111111111 ........ .. TT ------------ -- ----------- S I , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ILI, M I .............. al ...................... \ I r pii L C mmmmmm =I .-f . i --- -- +I - r\ )> : I I .......... -- ------ 0 0 �j FJ Lc I somm�ng on■ man CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 ) Name of Applicant JWJ Realty 2 ) Name of Subdivision JWJ Realty 3) Submit Subdivision Fee 90.00 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) • 4.76 acres, 1 lot, commercial, 13,500 s.f. existing auto dealer; 9,147 s.f. 1st floor; 3,100 s.f. 2nd floor;/ new auto dealer and site work 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: NO CHANGE 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Civil Engineering Associates - Shelburne Steve Vock - 985-2323 b. Surveyor C. Paul E. Marcotte d. Plat Designer Sames as engineer 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: NO CHANGE 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: SEE ATTACHMENT 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application: SEE ATTACHMENT 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings $540 , 000 00 b ) Landscaping 16 -190 00 c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work 150,000.00 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes (2-way traffic, in plus out) : SEE SUBMITTED LETTERS A.M. Peak hour Average daily traffic P.M. peak hour % of trucks 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City. b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. 2 13) Development timetable and completion dates): 14) Start Summer 1992 CmmnIpto Spring/Summer 1993 (including number of phases, and start List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: Approval of two buildings for one user Commercial Complex (19.65(b)) 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, -those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph 1 above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. ✓risyz (Signature) applicant or contact person 4 JWJREALTY MAY 14, 1992 ATTACHMENT TO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LIST OF OWNERS OF RECORD James Fayette, et al. 1930 Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Burlington Mall, Inc. Pomerleau Real Estate 69 College Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 C&S Wilkins 11 Elosom Parkway South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Nicholas and Sara Pappas 1908 Shelburne Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 James and Debra Wessen 1110 Shelburne Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 JWJ REALTY MAY 14, 1992 ATTACHMENT TO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION DRAWING LIST WIEMANN-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS' DRAWINGS S1 Landscape Plan; S2 Site Layout Plan; Al Floor Plan; A2 Elevation; A4 Enlarged Plaza Plans; A5 Enlarged Plaza Plans; progress date 05/15/92 progress date 05/04/92 progress date 05/04/92 progress date 05/04/92 progress date 05/05.92 progress date 05/05/96 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES' DRAWINGS (Saturn of So. Burlington) 1 2 3 4 I Site Plan; Plan and Profiles; Water, Sewer and Erosion Control Details; Roadway and Drainage Details; Erosion Control Plan; Specifications; dated April, 92, revised 05/07/92 dated April, 92 dated April, 92 dated April, 92 dated April, 92 dated April, 92 q' IS • IIRIN— Vow. Et.r.E.—t, 1 GRAVEL LOT E E. I �9lYti.e � I I T I _ _ ProDo. d South Burltnpton D.o l.r IB d, South Burllnp ten Chr .t.r PI mouth M tr -1 V-{1• C 1COA' SHELBURNE ROAD n n "SITE PLAN BITE DATA +. L%I.TI HG .UI LDING 13..N 91 a. PRO►WED .UI LOI NG ..117 tV 3. SUBTOTAL BUILDING 2a.713 .P (10.M OOVCNAOC) MWM O►CD PAVED CA 121.71e BI (ee.°; OOJCRA°C) .. TOTAL PROPOGm(a.a) 1{{.{ae .I (N.eR OOVEAAGC) .. BI TC AREA 207.70E B/ ({.7e AMES) ►MK I NG 90. BUURRLLEI ENGGTONNTpCOOOIRYGIKR LLYIWOUTH tTeORA°E/°mm x °ATTURNNrOO[r/p80.. DBUURRRLINGTON s�o11AGE�DIOPLAY u SHARED STORAGE 1. RECEIVED MAY 0 5 1992 City of So. Burlington 00 NOT GOALS OPAWINOS NO. DATE REVISION SITE LAYOUT PLAN SATURN OF SOUTH ■URUNCTON SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT —IPIQ. 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE COLCHESTER. VERMONT COPYRIGHT O VADIANN—LAMPHERE ARCHRECTS. INC. SCALE 1" - 30'-O- DRAWING NO. DATE PROD 00-Os-92 DMWN BY RJL .� CHECKED BY DIX PROJECT 92019 h'1AY— 5-92 0 A";,,,+ IY. i : 4 1 CEV4 P IFJ 1. rw11,„i . MICAR�rri WARAMM I ti%t FAYET'1-CCO, Inc;,A' Vermont orporation with offcieo and principal ,�iaco of buslnoss at Burlington, and FREDERICK J. FAYSTTE and BARBARA A, FAY4TTU of South surlinaton in t14 County rf ' Chittcncicn slid ,Staid 0j Vnrnont Oranturs, tit tl" aa�tsld�rutton of ` I ..........Tan and Moro ............... DOW# I � paid to our Jul) atattajaetio>s by IICRCULL--S SUPPLY CQRPORAT'ION, o Vermont Corroration with office anal principal pl000 of busir,ass at South oLirlinatoiI, of couth Burlington in tine Caurr.61 of Chittondan and State df vcrm nt Orar�teo , by thase prosewsI do freoty Cur. Qiful;i, rli, c£annrl; A4tb tion!trut "Itto Clio raid crur:tC4 r HEACUwF;S SUPPLY CORPORA'T408 and its/- -- AL.N'$ lead enter,• forever, a certcin piles of land its South Burlington • ir. 0 County of Chi ttonden and Stato of Yorle,91 t, de,.crib'."1 , follows, van: A vacant piece or parcel of land containing 4.76 acres, situu•,.•.i on the wastarly side of the public lilghwi;ty known an41 Jc,ignatc6 Shol- burno Road or U,S, Route 07 and situated,in the northcastoriy, portion of lands that were convoyed to PayottecoInc. by fredorick .1. Fayette, at al, by Warranty Dvad dated June 4, l0h ana recorded in 91, Pago 138 of the Town of South Burlington Land Records. T;:, conveyed piece or parcal of,land is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an iron pipe, situatoI in the westerly sidoline of said Shelburne Road or U.S. Route 07, which point marks the southeasterly , cornor v£ lands acquired by Richard 0. Fournier, Rogor W, prior and ,Charlcs P. Whttnoy by Warranty good from 8, J. fayotto, dated Juno 8, 1953 and recorded in Volume 30 page 620 of said Land Recor49, and which point is tho northeastbriy corner of the heroin Grantors' promises; thence proa000ing! "i71°33'Sb"w is the northerly line of Pay• atteco, Ina. and the southerly line of sold property now or formerly of Faurn er, Prior and Whitney for a distance of 165 Foot to an irons �Ipoi thonco procceding N14114'411'8 in the easterly lino of said ayottoco, Inc. and the wustorly lino of said property now or formerly of Fournxor, Prior and Whitney for a distance of'190 feet to an iron Pipe situated In Cho southorly line of the eomotory; thence proceeding ,471111013311W in the northor1r,,11ne of said Foyatteco, Inc., and the southorly lino of the ccme,t,o�'y for a distanco of 224,73 foot to a steel chain lank fence cornor'post in concrete, thanco proceodin$ N18'03122"B in an oastcrly lido o£ sold Fayottoco, Inc, and the waster l lin.o.PX-sold comatery for ;t distance of 141,12 foot to a stool chain link fence cornor post In concrote; thence proceeding N71005'31"i' in a northerly line of said rayetteco, Inc. and the southerly line of lands new or formerly owned by *jia Morrihow for a distanco of 129Y00 �. foot to an iron pi -poi 0011co proceeding 818'48110"if across lands of xu,N i,►rt, for u Jlstunco of 57943 £uot to at; lr,'.i y1po; `► thonco procoodi,np $71'09106118 across lands of said Fayottoco, Inc. for A distance of S75,00 toot to an iron ppips situated in the wort sidolin of said Shoiburrte Road, or U,S.Routo i7; thence procoed�ng N1801414111E in the oastorly line of said F;lyottoco, Inc. and the westerly line of said Shelburne Road or U.S.Routo 17 for a distance of 250'foot to tho �..� iron pipe At the point or placo of beginning. The heroin conveyed piece or parcal of Iand is,shown and amid dawn on one oortain 1.tn of isnd dated hovembor 9, 1970, proparod'by Paul 5, Marlette, ro stared land svrvayor, and rocordod in Volume w, o Page /,I- o the own of South Burl t La d Records. Included horoin is an easement tdrain surface wata over o7flowrinS of the horoin grantors lyingg southerly of tho horoin convoye said surfaco water originati,n easterly of Shelburne Road an westerly otrto the nbova deserlbod,parcol pWrsuant to a drainage enso- ►nai�t rl'uul'1'�'o,iorlui. J, Vilrotto of al to lZ3chard F. ltaydon elated kfarch 24, 1J54 and rocordod In Volume 34, Pago 37 of tho Town of South Burl• j inut,on Lund Reaerd•. siii3 flaw to turn soy tlrerly„aoproxtmlltoly 10 fo4Cr, Z�'4 +ry wo,sterly of Sholburno Romd and flow onto other land of tho heroin MVr�antoro lying; next southorly to tho horoin conveyed Parcel and owing thereafter wcstorly over other land of tho horoin grantor6 t to a point approximatoly 4$0 foot westerly of'Sholburno Road whero it turns northerly and travols on to the lands hurein.'conveyed and Ft1lonce joins another natural stream flowing southwestorly. bank on to lands of tho heroin grantors. ' Moaning and intending to grant to the herein grantee the right to 'di,vort said sur';aco water southorly a proximatcl} 30 fact wo-storly of Shelburno Road on to other lands og tho herein grantors said water to flow wcstarlp ovor other lands of the heroin gruntors lying nowt southorly of the Heroin conveyed parcel to a point appraxi- matcly 4801fact westerly of ShoibVrpo Road, The grantee horoin agreas that it will ditch a oourso on ggrantors' other land for said water flow, said ditch to be complotcd prior to July 1, 1971 and the grantors herein agroo that the grantee will have no obligation after said date to maintain, repair elsr� I i`he ma'sstt waste rt on of the convoyed Promises may be subject to a small portion of tho sower easemant described in an Easement Deed from Fayattuco, Inc, to the Town of South Burlington dated Novombar , ,1970, and recorded in Volume 9G -, Pago ,� of said an We —cords, Froderick J. Fayette and Barbara A. Foyatto join in this conveyance ,tp include any interest Choy might have in the above described par - col ind eascmont to drain surface water. ProderiA J. Payette and his late wife, 8111Dn Mn irayatto, a'tauirod land lying to-tho south of toe herein convoyed parcal by Warranty Dood from B, J. Fayetto dated July 17, 1030 and recorded in Volums 13, Pago 180 of said Lan$ Records. $aid Ellen Ann Fgyotto has sine deceased and Prodor- i4k J. Fayotto has remarried 9arbara A. Fayetto. _ _1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 8, 1992 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-i,amphere A,:-hitects 30 South Park. Drive Coichester, Vermont. 05446 Re: New Aut- Dealer ship - 1095 Shelburne Road i>ear Mr. Lavigne : ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 FI cl-):,ed is the agt. ida for next. Tuesday' - Planning Commission meet -L: ng and conwient:.: City Engineer Bill 3--ymanski. , Fire hiet ,Jim Gc?,Ad-LAt.e an! Please be sure someone is pre -sent car: T_tr.:day, M:ay 12, 117�92 at. 7:001 P.M. to represent your re ,u-rt . I'.= y,-iu have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, j6fC W e6IJ Joe Weith, City Planner. Encls ,JWlmcp M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. S.zymanski, City Engineer Re: May 12, 1992 Preliminary Continents Date: May 1, 1992 SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER - PLYMOUTH 1. Drainage system'pipe shall. be plastic or concrete not metal or aluminum. 2. Plan prepared by Civil Engineering Association dated April, 1992 is acceptable. DR.. SLACK PROPERTY, GILBERT STREET The record plan should show the drainage pipe in the area. If a portion of this pipe crosses the property a drainage easement shall be given to the City. 350 DORSET STREET (ALCO BUILDING) 1. The entrance drive shall conrorm to the Dorset Streit improvement. plans. 2. The existing gravel area should be top soiled and seeded and maintained as a lawn. 3. The record plan should show the drainage system including the piping and discharge point. BONANZA. SH.ELBURNE ROAD 1. The drainage play, shall include the underground pipe system including pipe size and invert. elevations. 2. Large trucks especially those that have equipment that runs constantly should notbe allowed because of the clew proximity to the residential area. r ` ' ,uutlt "urlingtnn Nire �e artment f IV 575 Burnet street : Qlith NUrliii[jtiYti, lierlIlllllt 1154113 (802) 658-7960 TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE RE: TUESDAY MAY 12,1992 AGENDA ITEMS DATE: TUESDAY APRIL 28,1992 1. DR. SLACK GILBERT STREET 2—LOT SUB —DIVISION PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. 2. BONANZA RESTURANT AND HOTEL PROJECT PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING MUST BE CORRECTED IF WE ARE TO GIVE EMERGENCY FIRE PROTECTION: A. AT LEAST 2700 G.P.M. WATER SUPPLY IS REQUIRED. B. TWO HYDRANTS WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE PROPERTY AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. 3. ANNEX TO HANDY PROPERTY FROM KELLY & JENNINGS SHELBURNE ROAD AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. 4. SO. BURLINGTON CHRYSLER PLYMONTH SHELBURNE ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THEIR IS NO WAY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COULD GIVE EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF NEEDED. THERE IS A WATER PROBLEM AND HYDRANT LOCATION PROBLEM AS WELL AS ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT TO BOTH BUILDINGS. CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM April 6, 199Z Treasurer Mr. Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dear Gary: RECEIVED APR 7 199? WIEMANN-LAMPHERE, ARCHITECTS As I mentioned during our telephone conversation, according to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations for maximum trips, the South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dealership is allowed a total gross floor area of approximately 26,000 square feet. It is important to note that the traffic generation charts in the South Burlington regulations are based upon the 4th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The 5th Edition of the manual is based upon a substantially larger study group and shows a significant decrease in the amount of trips generated from an automobile dealership. Since we do not have the 5th Edition in our office, I asked Roger Dickinson to summarize the estimated trip generation calculations in a letter (see enclosed). If you should need any additional information prior to your meeting, please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock SAV:pao Enclosure STUDIES a DESIGN a INSPECTION a TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY 8 WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 (802) 878-4450 LAMOUREUX & STONE Consulting Engineers, Inc. April 3, 1992 Mr. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 RE: Trip Generation Analyses South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth Dear Steve: 27 High Street St. Albans, Vermont 05478 (802) 524-5245 ..t APR 06 1`'go" �''.l'�I CllS';i;tc i�.'•:�; .iiS1'i0tie�BS, ire„ As requested, we have developed a projected trip generation estimate for the proposed expansion of the South Burlington Chrysler/Plymouth new car dealership. As we understand the existing facilities at this location, they include 13,500 gross square feet (gsf) of building floor area on a 4.75 acre lot. The proposed expansion will add 9,000 gsf of new building floor area, bringing the total on the existing lot to 22,500 gsf. This location falls within Zone 4 of the Traffic Overlay District, as outlined in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Zone 4 includes those lots which access onto a high -volume roadway segment via a signalized intersection. Referring to Table III of the Zoning Regulations for new car sales, a maximum building size of 5,000 gsf is allowed per 40,000 square feet of lot size is-,Zona 4. For this lot, that is equivalent to a maximum building floor area of 25,864 gsf. Since Table III of the Zoning Regulations uses the 4th Edition of Trip Generation as a reference, and that has been superseded by the 5th Edition published in 1991, we double-checked the existing and projected trip generation of this project using the current edition. In the 5th Edition of Trip Generation, the data base for new car sales (Land -use Category #841) has been considerably expanded. Whereas the 4th Edition had only two studies on which to base its weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation rate, the 5th Edition now has 20. This allows for a much more reliable estimate of the vehicular trip generation Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Planning . Land Surveying Mr. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. April 3, 1992 Page 2 for this land use. Table 1 presents the resulting estimates of the existing and proposed peak hour vehicular trip generation at this location. TABLE 1 Peak Hour Vehicular Trip Generation Existing Proposed (vte/hour) Enter Exit I Total Enter Exit Total Weekday - P.M. Peak Hour of Adj. Street 17 24 41 25 37 62 Weekday - P.M. Peak Hour of Generator 15 18 33 25 30 55 Saturday - Peak Hour of Generator 20 20 40 34 33 67 Zone 4 of the Traffic Overlay District allows a maximum of 30 vte/hour per 40,000 square feet of lot size during the peak hour. For this lot, that is equivalent to 155 vte/hour. All of the above proposed peak hour trip generation estimates are substantially below the allowed maximum for this lot. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, J � Y Rog r Di kinson, P.E. r/vock.rjd City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 7, 1992 Mr. Gary Lay.ig_ize _.- Wiemanri-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive Colchester, Vermont 05446 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sewer Allocation - New De,-ilership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: This is t.z, inform you that the City currently has availaLie the 150 gpd sewer allocation required for the proposed auto dealership at 1095 Shelburne Road. Please be aware that the Planning Commission approves sewer allocation at the time of preliminary plat approval. You should also be aware that the uncommitted reserve capacity at the treatment plant is quite limited at this time and there are other projects approved an,] under review which also require sewer allocation. Allocation is awarded on a first come first serve basis. If you have any questions, please give me a'caii. cerely, Jvr- Weith, City Planner JW/mcp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 May 4, 1992 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Gary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 3 9 South Park. Drive - Colchester, Vermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 1095 Shelburne Road Dear Mr. Lavigne: Enclosed please find some preliminary comments on the above referenced project. from City Engineer Bill Szymanski. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SincqTely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant 1 Encl RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 1, 1992 Vary Lavigne Wiemann-Lamphere Architect.5 30 South Park Drive Colchester, �fermont 05446 Re: New Auto Dealership - 109�, Shelburne Road Dear Mi, . Lavigne: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed pleast� fin,_1 some preliminary comments r: t.'.:c <.bcve referenced application form Fire Chief Jim Goddette and myself. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski will be forwarded to you as soon as they are available. Please submit the additional information requested and/or revised plans no later 4--h-r. 'T,Jesday, May 5, 1992. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ely, Raymond J. Belai.r, Zoning and Planning Assistant. Encls RJB/mcp SHELBURNE ROAD (---) I � " SITE PLAN ""I" :CEIVED APR I �±. 1992 City of So. Burlington SITE DATA 1. EXISTING BUILDING 13,300 SF 2. PROPOSED BUI LDINO E,310 SF 3. SUBTOTAL BUILDING 21,810 SF (10.3111 COVERAGE) 4. PROPOSED PAVED AREA 122.540 SF (39% COVERAGE) 3. TOTAL PROPOSED(3+4) 144,350 SF (69.3% COVERAGE) E. SITE AREA 207.705 SF (4.75 ACRES) NO.1 DATE I REVISION SITE PLAIN SOUTH BURLINGTON CHR'YSLER PLYMOUTH SHELBURNE ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE - COLCHESTER, VERIJONT COPYRIGHT O WDAANN-LAAIPHERE ARCHITECTS, INC. SCALE 1" 30--O" DRAWING NO. DATE PROG BY 03-2hJL S DRAWN BY RJL CHECKED BY CO. PROJECT 92012 PROJ NAME: 92019 1 M E M O R A N D U M To: Project Files �-�6 From: Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments - May 12, 1992 agenda items Date: April 28, 1992 SOUTH BURLINGTON CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH - NEW DEALERSHIP Additional information required on sketch plan: --- name and address of the owner of record. --- names of owners of record of contiguous properties. --- type of, location, and approximate size of existing and proposed utilities. --- graphic scale --- location map --- show sewer easement running along the rear of the property. Other: --- for coverage purposes, the display area in front of Lhe existing building can not be counted as green space. It is either green space or display area, it can not be both. If display area is to remain, than its limits must. be shown. --- staff estimates that the existing facility must provide 27 parking spaces and the proposed facility 17 parking spaces which are separate from vehicles storage and display areas for customers and employees. These spaces must be identified on the plan. --- provide cost estimate of new building --- staff calculates front yard coverage to be 31%, maximum allowed is 30%. (this assumes no display area). --- handicapped spaces should be indicated. --- dumpst.ers must be shown and screened. ----Lndicate use of the land for future addition until it is bui14-. --- due to limited sewer allocation available in this part of the Cit.l, "t is recommended that the applicant discuss sewer availability with the State. --- applicant will need to obtain approval from Aor to alter access to Shelburne Road. 1 Preliminary Memo - Planning May 12, 1992 agenda April 28, 1992 Page 2 --- a detailed landscaping plan will be required at the time of preliminary plat review. --- indicate type of surface gravel, pavement, etc. --- curb cut is proposed to width allowed is 36 fee Commission due to special --- there is a stream along show CO zone limits, not allowed within this zone. proposed for parking areas, i.e. be widened to 45 feet, the maximum t unless approved by the Planning circumstances. the south property line, plan must e that paving and parking are not HANDY MOTEL ADDITION - 792 SHELBURNE ROAD --- this property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 1 which allows this parcel to generate a maximum of 27 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. Applicant's traffic consultant estimates that the restaurant and proposed motel will generate 68 vte's. This number is arrived at by using trip characteristic's of a quality restaurant when the applicant has informed staff that the restaurant will be a high turnover restaurant. There therefore appears to be an inconsistency with the report. Staff calculates this project will generate 162.6 vte's using the high turnover restaurant category. The applicant will be required to contribute to the Shelburne Road Traffic Impact Fund based on the number of additional trips generated. -- +,is project requires approximately 150 parking spaces and only 94 spaces are being provided. It is staff's understanding that fewer parking spaces are being provided because of anticipated shared parking between the restaurant and motel. It is suggested that the applicant submit a shared parking analysis to substantiate the reduction in parking. --- the parking aisles serving the double rows of parking scale to be less than the 24 foot width requirement. --- sewer allocation needed for this project. is 6000 gpd. This allocation is currently available from the City but may not be available from the State. Applicant should contact State to determine if sewer allocation is available from them. 2 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record JWJ Realty 1095 Shelburne Road, South Burlington b . Applicant Same as above. C. Contact Gary Lavigne, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, VT 05446 Tel:655-5020 rax : 6sS-G-76�7 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). Commercial complex with two buildings (one user: automobile car dealer) on one lot, 1095 Shelburne Road. 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. Land and building owner. 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 1 4 6) Proposed extension, facilities such as storm drainage, etc. relocation, or modification of municipal sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, Sanitary sewer, water supply. storm drainage, gas, electric, telephone. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affect the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: Variance - for use. 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8 1/2 x 11, 8 1/2 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the follow- ing information: _ 1) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. 2) Boundaries and area of: (a) all contiguous land belong- ing to owner of record and (b) proposed subdivision. 3) Existing "and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. 4) Type of location, and approximate size of existing and proposed streets, utilities, and open space. 5) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). 6) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. 1AZ (Signature) applicant or contact person Aate Gary Lavigne 2 --FOR INF �TION ONLY-- _ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) JWJ Realty 1095 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT 2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #) Same as above. 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #) 655-5020 Gary Lavigne, Wiemann-Lamphere Architects 30 South Park Drive, (bl hestar, VT 05446 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS : 1095 Shelburne Road 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Automobile Dealership 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor) Existing 13,500 s.f.,. New 8,310 s.f., height 22' 1 floor 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 10 new employees 9) LOT COVERAGE: building 10.5 %; landscaped areas % building, parking, outside storage69.5 % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ Landscaping $ Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $ 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Summer 1992 12 ) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ( in and out )See letter on file. Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. ; 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 P.M. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: LA11; Ur SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE OF HEARING §�nutb Tjl' urliugtuu Yire D epartmeut 575 +�.inrset �trcct - nttth-413ttrlingtutt. licrtntint 05403 (802) 658-7960 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: 1. 0 3. SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION CHIEF GODDETTE TUESDAY MAY 12,1992 AGENDA ITEMS TUESDAY APRIL 28,1992 DR. SLACK GILBERT STREET 2-LOT SUB -DIVISION PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPT AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. BONANZA RESTURANT AND HOTEL PROJECT PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE FOLLOWING MUST BE CORRECTED IF WE ARE TO GIVE EMERGENCY FIRE PROTECTION: A. AT LEAST 2700 G.P.M. WATER SUPPLY IS REQUIRED. B. TWO HYDRANTS WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE PROPERTY AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE. ANNEX TO HANDY PROPERTY FROM KELLY & JENNINGS SHELBURNE ROAD AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS PROJECT. 4. SO. BURLINGTON CHRYSLER PLYMONTH SHELBURNE ROAD PLANS WERE REVIEWED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND AT THIS TIME THEIR IS NO WAY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COULD GIVE EMERGENCY PROTECTION IF NEEDED. THERE IS A WATER PROBLEM AND HYDRANT LOCATION PROBLEM AS WELL AS ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT TO BOTH BUILDINGS. PLANNER 658- 7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 March 8, 1996 Attorney Thomas Heilmann Heilmann, Ekman & Associations, Inc. P.O. Box 216 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0216 Re: Appeal of McLean Holding Corporation Dear Tom: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This office is in receipt of your "Notice of Appeal" concerning a notice of violation issued by Raymond Belair, Planning and Zoning Assistant for the City of South Burlington, dated February 2, 1996. I believe that the violation has been cured with the corrective action taken by the McLean Holding Corporation, d.b.a. Saturn of South Burlington. The display vehicles in question have been removed from the site in question, 1085 Shelburne Road. Should you intend to continue with the appeal before the Zoning Board of Adjustment, a filing fee of fifty ($50.00) dollars is due to the City of South Burlington (Section 4462(a) of the Vermont Planning & Development Act, V.S.A. Title 24). Without a filing fee, the notice of appeal is deemed incomplete and no further action will be taken. Be advised that the next scheduled hearing for the Board of Adjustment is April 8, 1996, the filing deadline being March 20, 1996. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. TI IE GIDEON KING HOUSL 35 KING STREET P. O. BOX 21G BURLING FON. VERMONi 05 102-021G I I IOMAS F. 111.1 MANN (FIR I.'�IOPIIIA 1). IIFMAN 1'OhU 1) . CI II O' WIERG Mr. Lance Llewellyn, Clerk Board of Adjustment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: McLean Holding Corporation Dear Lance: March 6, 1996 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED I I I I111 IONI. (60:)) 86 1-A'")S I AX M (40:) Fi(, lI ,1 ' M Enclosed please find a Notice of Appeal concerning the letter issued by the Raymond Belair dated February 22, 1996. I would appreciate it if you would sign the enclosed Acknowledgement and return it to me forthwith. Under Vermont law, there is no filing fee required for this appeal. Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas Heilmann TFH:llb Enclosure cc: Joseph Mclean, Esq. LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In Re: ) McLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION ) NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES McLean Holding Corporation, by and through its attorneys, Heilmann, Ekman & Associates, Inc. and, pursuant to 24 V. S.A. § 4464 (a) , hereby appeals to the City of South Burlington Board of Adjustment from the determination of the Administrative Officer of the South Burlington Zoning Department, which determination is set forth in a February 20, 1996 letter from the Zoning and Planning Assistant for the City of South Burlington to the Appellant. The Appellant is McLean Holding Corporation which is located at 1089 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The property with respect to which the appeal is taken is situated at 1085 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont and is all and the same lands and premises conveyed to McLean Holding Corporation by Warranty Deed of Susanne Wilkins dated February 1, 1996. The regulatory provisions applicable to the appeal is 24 V.S.A. §4463(a)(1) and §4464(a) and the Zoning By -Laws of the City of South Burlington. Appellant requests that the determination made above be vacated and reversed inasmuch as Appellant has a final order from the Zoning Board of Adjustment authorizing the use which is claimed by the Zoning Administrator to have been violated. Dated at Burlington, Vermont this day of March, 1996. HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES By: Thomas F. Heilmann, Esq. mc)[M . app a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In Re: ) McLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FILING OF APPEAL I, Lance Llewelyn, Clerk of the Board of Adjustment, hereby acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Appeal filed by McLean Holding Corporation in the above matter. mcloCack LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. 0. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 Dated at Burlington, Vermont this day of March, 1996. Lance Llewelyn, Clerk Board of Adjustment City of South Burlington LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FHE GIDEON KING IiOUSE 35 KING STREET P. 0. BOX 216 BIJKLING L'ON, VERMONT 05402.-0216 THOMAS F. HEILMANN CHRISTOPHER D. EKMAN TODD D. SCHLOSSBERG Mr. Lance Llewellyn, Clerk Board of Adjustment 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: McLean Holding Corporation Dear Lance: TELEPHONE (802) 864-4555 FAX n (802) 864-4659 March 6, 1996 CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Enclosed please find a Notice of Appeal concerning the letter issued by the Raymond Belair dated February 22, 1996. I would appreciate it if you would sign the enclosed Acknowledgement and return it to me forthwith. Under Vermont law, there is no filing fee required for this appeal. Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Heilmann TFH:llb Enclosure cc: Joseph Mclean, Esq. LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In Re: ) McLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION ) NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES McLean Holding Corporation, by and through its attorneys, Heilmann, Ekman & Associates, Inc. and, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4464(a), hereby appeals to the City of South Burlington Board of Adjustment from the determination of the Administrative Officer of the South Burlington Zoning Department, which determination is set forth in a February 20, 1996 letter from the Zoning and Planning Assistant for the City of South Burlington to the Appellant. The Appellant is McLean Holding Corporation which is located at 1089 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont. The property with respect to which the appeal is taken is situated at 1085 Shelburne Road in South Burlington, Vermont and is all and the same] lands and premises conveyed to McLean Holding Corporation by{ Warranty Deed of Susanne Wilkins dated February 1, 1996. The regulatory provisions applicable to the appeal is 24 V.S.A. §4463(a)(1) and §4464(a) and the Zoning By -Laws of the City of South Burlington. Appellant requests that the determination made above be vacated and reversed inasmuch as Appellant has a final order from the Zoning Board of Adjustment authorizing the use which is claimed by the Zoning Administrator to have been violated. Dated at Burlington, Vermont this day of March, 1996. mdeC app HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES By: Thomas F. Heilmann, Esq. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT In Re: ) McLEAN HOLDING CORPORATION ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FILING OF APPEAL I, Lance Llewelyn, Clerk of the Board of Adjustment, hereby acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Appeal filed by McLean Holding Corporation in the above matter. mdeCacr LAW OFFICES HEILMANN, EKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. BOX 216 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0216 Dated at Burlington, Vermont this day of March, 1996. Lance Llewelyn, Clerk Board of Adjustment City of South Burlington City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7955 658.7958 February 20, 1996 McLean Holding Corporation 1089 Shelburne Rd. So. Burlington, VT. 05403 RE: Zoning Violation at 1085 Shelburne Rd. Gentlemen: Please be advised that based on information avialble to the City, you have commenced land development of your property at the above address without obtaining a pemrit from the City required by Section 27.10 of its Zoning Bylaws and 24 V.S.A. 4443 (a) (1). Specifically, you have initiated the following activities on the above -described property: Placed "Saturn" motor vehicles on the subject property on display for the purpose of sale or advertisement, thereby changing the use of the property to an auto sales use. You have seven (7) days from the date of this letter to discontinue this violation and take appropriate remedial action. Specifically, you must accomplish the following: Remove all vehicles placed on display for the purpose of sale or advertisement from the subject property. If you do not accomplish the actions directed in this letter within seven (7) days of the date of this letter, the City may pursue this matter in court. In such court proceeding, the City will be entitled to seek appropriate injunctive relief and fines of up to $50.00 per day for each day your violation continues beyond the seven (7) day period provided in this letter. If the violation described in this letter occurs again within twelve (12) months of the date of this letter, you will not be entitled to receive a further Notice of Violation from the City before the City pursues further enforcement proceedings. You may appeal this Notice of Violation to the Board of Adjustment by filing a written notice of appeal within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter with the Clerk of The Board of Adjustment at the following address: 575 Dorset St., South Burlington, Vermont 05403. If you have any questions me at the telephone number set Si rel aond J. Be l a i r Zoning and Planning Assistant. cc: Joe McLean, Esq. regarding this letter, please call forth above. CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURNED RECEIPT REQUESTED. o �a 1711 _ E LI7 i C o 0 C U aa� ;� y LL 1� a. ` i 3 ai N Po O O U lizoN ti �lr' a ¢ E cv5zm 0 d w Y c L �. Q; E o �( C661 4CULM r008C WJOA Sd i Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra M Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): fetum this card to you. 9� Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address dies not permit. • W rite "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. C P The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date 2. El Restricted Delivery delivered. Consult Dostmaster for fee. m 3. Article Addressed to: m e c�-Ati H021,0 6 cbofATIA 4a. Article Number M z 155' V5- 8a j �/_ A t o IC� S Ir �m�vf—; 4b. Service T e s El Registered,, ❑ Insured pu o� /o j a Certified :' ❑ COD 5 w ¢ ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for z Merchandise G 7. Date of Delivery w 2 5. Signature (Addressee) l— W 6. Sign re ( gent) 3 0 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested .x and fee is paid) C a L F- > PS Form 381 ,December 1991 *U.S.GP0:1993-352-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT