The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-81-0000 - Supplemental - 1116 Shelburne Road (2)January 27, 1981 I Mr. Lcwell T. Spillane ;tD # 2 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: 1116 Shelburne Road i �I Bear Mr. Spillane: i Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has approved your request for Shelburne Road and tabled action at Williston Road until a revised plan is suLmitted. UD The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions feel free to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning .Administrative Officer i Irv/mcg SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA�.D OF ADJUST ANT =indings in accordance with Section L46P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1.__..J (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefor necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (_Y (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; � (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development -of adjacent property, nor :e detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the lust modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Je Appeal # 3 Date %1-2, 6 r Annellant Vote: Yes No Fist findings below: 2. Sign U SOUTH EURLI GTON ZOI;ING BOAF.D OF AD�UST`=T Findings in accordance with Section L46P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unicue physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b; the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the rroperty is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization or a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; FJ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aoprcoriate use or development.of -adjacent property, nor :-e detrimental to ti;e public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least - modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # -% Da to Vote . Yes No Sign Fist findings below: —T 2. _ 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA�.D OF ADJUST'ENT Findings in accordance with Section. 445P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity-, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b; the provisions of the zoning regulations in he neighborhood or district in which the Troperty is located; (2) That because of such physical circu^Istances or conditions, there is no Possibility that the property can '-= developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninC regulations and that the authorization of a variance is t---refere necessary to enal,le the reasonable use of the prODerty; Cv< (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; t?� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the annrepriate use or develon►:,ent .of adjacent property, nor le detrimental to tr.e public welfare; and (Jt' (5) That the variance, if authorized, wi,1 represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification pcssit;le of the zoning regulations and of th- plan. ' /1 e- It / ` Gl Date 1 LL Appellant�PIL4'Ahle;'S Vote: Yes W No Ej List findings below: Appeal # J Sirnu.G. 1. _ SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUM NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional toperaphical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due tc such conditions, and not the circumstances or condition generally created b; the provisions of the zoning regu lat_ons in the neighborhood or district in which the r.ropr-rty is located; E (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions., there is no possibility that the property can be d-veloped in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enat1e the reasonable use of the property; Ci (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; I (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the apprcrriate use or development .of ad j ent property, nor Le detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the variance that will afford relief and will represent modification possible of the zoning regulations and Date / -- 2 �-- minimum the bast of th,\,, ,> plain. Appeal Appellant , Vote: Yes No Si .n)� List findings below. �--- 1. _ 2. 3. SOTM H BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTIENT ?findings in accordance with Section 41+6P of the Planning'& Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b.� the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the rroperty is located; jam' (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; LLJJ('�/ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; X (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aourceriate use or development.of adjacent property, nor le detrimental to t'cie public welfare; and 19 (S) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least - modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Annellant Vote: Yes Q No SIcn List findings below: