Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-87-0001 - Supplemental - 1116 Shelburne RoadSOUTH HUHLINGTON "ZONING I1OAPD Off' ADJUSTMu INT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization o; a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; c (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 0 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and El (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan./ Da to / ``2 li Appellant l�mZ_�--%lam Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: 2. 3� Appeal # L I,-, S i g � �O / �G7 !'Gco.✓!oa'Gf� l �� � ���-�.G� W�, S� T ti SOUTH 13UHLINGTON "CONING I3OAitD OF ADJUS' M' INT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; F (2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; H (4) That the varLi—alnce, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and �- (ram (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Da t e Appella t Vote: Yes Q List findings below: R 1. 2. 3- Appeal # SOUTH BURLINGTON 'I.ONING I30Ai41) 0!�' ADJUS' M' ,NT Findings In accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the par,ticular,property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; r (2) That because of such:physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; do (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; a� (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and No (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. No Da t e dftlS7 Appellant Vote: List findings below: 1. 2. 3- Appeal # 4 t1Z,18 -7 Sig SOUTH HUPLINGTON "ZONING I30Ai:1) OF ADJUS'1M; .N'1' Findings in accordance with Section 446i of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the par,ticular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; LJ (2) That because of such : physical,circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; M (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; H (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and Q (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date ,Appellant l Vote: Yes Q No Sign ' L'1 List findings below: 1. 2. 3- SOUTH BUHLINGTON ZONING JIOA;iD OF ADJUS'1';".`INT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, Including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular,property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 1___1 (2) That because of such•physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; H (4) That the varLi—alnce, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1( (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El Appeal # �/ Date / 6//Sr `7 Appellant L ca,,e l( T S& 1 1 x ,o - Vote: Yes Q No Sign 2'ZE List findings below: 1. 2. 3- SOUTH BUR LINGTON ZONING I30Ai? 1) O!' ADJ U:')TX.:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the par,ticular.property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such cohditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such :physical,circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; E..1 (3) That such Ie-ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and Er (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. u Date Appellant hoc✓ / J19�%/sties Vote: Yes No �] List findings below: 2. 3� Appeal # __7 I Sign SOUTH BUELINGTON "l,ONING I)OAi'.0 0!-' AUJUST."`.NT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular,property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;--.- (2) That because of such' physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ( ,j (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and j] (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan: --El Appeal # / % Z / y? Date / Z rg Appellant Vote: Yes pCj No U.. 0 1Ki 7/Iv+-� List findings below:` 2. 2. , 3• R