HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-77-0000 - Supplemental - 1085 Shelburne RoadApril 20, 197-
Attorney :caul Lee
101 ilain Street
Burlin-rton, VT 05401
Re: Zonin,: Appeal - Fournier & ,-'ilkins
Dear Attorney A -el:
Be advised that the:, zoning?, variance requested by 1•9r. Charles
Wilkins for the Fournier property located at 1085 Shelburne
Road has been :granted by the :South 3urlin� ton Zor.in ?oard of
Adjustment.
The Board approved only the dual uses which were proposed
(legal offices and "Charlie's Den" tennis accessories, sales
and service) the residential use will require another
hearin-, before the F,oard. In order to schedule this hearin�;
for the ',',ay 16th meetin„ a revised floor plan should be
submitted to this office no later than April 27, 1977.
Prior to co n.iiencin;; remodelin; of the buildin,;, you are re-
quired to obtain a permit from this office.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at
863-2F91.
Vory truly,
Richard 41ard
Zoning Administrative Officer
PA ,d
SOUTH ( ,LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF LJUSTI�ENT
Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
Q
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant; In
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and jam[
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Q
Date �J- /?-7
Appellant
Vote: Yes 0 No
List findings below:
2.
Appeal #
Sign
7
3.
SOUTH ( :LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF LJUMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; (a
(3) That such unnece sary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent p erty, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. El
Appeal # -�
Date y
Ap
we
Li
1.
2.
3
SOUTH r LLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF t JUSTNENT
Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in t neighborhood or district in which the property
is located;
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property; j-t�
(3) That such unnecery hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent pr erty, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 1
Date
Appellant
Vote: Yes No
List findin s below:
1._ 2
2.
7>
Appeal #
Sign