Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-77-0000 - Supplemental - 1085 Shelburne Road (2)Ver.mont U.- r.! 0 1 The .-equeCt of i-x. Charles `I,ilk,ins for the p,,o-pertly located at ",oad has been granted by the South Burlington Zoning of Pius c;aerzt. This pl-ovides 'LI+-.r cc-,--nt­ii�u! nce of e:,:'-'-icency C. othcr uses as-,-,rorosed. a C Very truly yours, i.c`. il n ri c icer 4 SOUTH kRLINGTON ZONING BOA :D ON ..JJUST�NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Ej (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Ri (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.. Date Appellant Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: 1. 2. 3. i Appeal m S Sign SOUTH �;LINGTON ZONING BOA::D OF AJUSTIYE.NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development !act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in/the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefgre necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnece sary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent p perty, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least Ell modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date �/� Appellant ~ Vote: Yes No Sir.n List findings below: 2. SOUTH tRLINGTON ZONING BOA;.D OF AJUST; NT ^indings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 10' (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property;' (3) That such urine ssary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and j (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. li i Appeal # Date Appellant Vote: Yes No Q si Dist findings below: /j 1. 2. 3 SOUTi. )URLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTIMSENT Findings'in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; . (2) That becau!5e' of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable e reasonable_ use of the property; (` (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character,of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (S) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and'will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan—.--Ej Date_ Appellant Vote: Li 1. 2. 3. Y s No F] Appeal # -� Sign