Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-85-0000 - Supplemental - 1080 Shelburne RoadJanuary 15, 1985 Mr. Nicholas Pappas 187 Summit Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Pappas; Be advised that the Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. The Board stipulated that satisfactory screening be worked out with the Collette's in accordance with the approval of the Planning Commission. The Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg -- - - SOUTH PUP, LINGTON--ZONING--AOhi?1) OF-ADJUSTM! .NT - - Findings in accordance with Section 446E of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; -0 (2) 'That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninf regulations and that thr- authorization of a variance is therefore n-cessary to enatle the reasonable use of the property; _.,�I (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant;.-8 ppellan.t;._ LJ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aonropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t!,e public welfare; and-_F7 (ri) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date J p e Ilan t�`��-�,'"�..-K.o Vote: Yes Yes No Q List findings below: I. Appeal # 1_1�2 F/ Z_ / �� v 'J �L Sign -- - SOUTH FURLINGT0N-GONIN(I-9OAi4,D Off'-ADJUSTM-:NT _ Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planr!ing & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; ID (2) 'That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninc regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enarl-e *,>,e reasonable rise of the property; E- (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; LI (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aonropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be d;trimental to the public welfare; and v (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the Dlan. Appeal # Date /— IV—i Vote: Yes Q No Sign List findings below: 'C4 ':A u� - �a�T� Cl n 4e,f--- SOUTH PUP LINGTON- ZON I NG -AOAr f> OF -ADJUSTS!-:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) '1'hat because of such physical circumstances or condition, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions or the zoninf, regulations and that the authorization o' a variance is therefore necessary to enarle t,"e reasonable use of the property; [XI (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the var a ce, if' authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aonropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t!le public welfare; and rSr L47- (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date % O 7 Vote: Yes No Sign .� I i qt finriinvq halnw' 1. 2. 3. SOUTH PUP,LINGTON- ZONING -AOAND Off'-ADJUSTM�.NT - Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b3 the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninf, regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enarle the reasonable use of the property; 1 L , (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant;LJ n (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aonropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 011 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning; regulations and of the plan. Date e11ant / Vote: Yes Q List findings below: 2. 3. r Appeal # �--- No Q Sign -- - SOUTH FUN LINGTON- GON ING -HOAR [) OF-ADJUSTM-;NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; -0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoninr regulations and that thF authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enarle the reasonable use of the property; EI (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the aonropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to trLe public welfare; and jam. (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. 0, Date_ nellantS—/� Vote: Yes No ID List findings below: 1. 2. _ 3. S v r --ter-- Appeal # Sign /L7 VAe%ffJ.0 �` vl =/ 12