Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-80-0000 - Decision - 1048 Shelburne RoadSOUTH BLMLINGTON ZONING BOAnD OF ADJUSTI E NT ?indings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b> the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; lid (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility.that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (i, (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; [- _ (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development .of adjacent property, nor :'e detrimental to the public welfare; and a (s) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal Date / Z, .'1nr,�11ant Ae.. 'k6t Vote: Yes 21` No Sign list findings below: 3• SOUTH EL'RLINGTON ZOi iNG BOAnD OF ADJUMENT ?findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or s'lallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topccrraphical or other physical conditions peculiar to thr ;,articular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or con6it:l ons P- ,nrrally cr eat�d b the provisions of the zor-_ne regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the rropr-rty is located; LI (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no Possibility that the PropertS can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enat•le ti-e reasonable use of the property; 0 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; Ii (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently ir:pair the aP nrcpriate use or development .of adjacent property, nor le d�trimnntal to tie public welfare; and 11 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the bast modification possible of the wring regulations and of th�� plan. Appeal # % L— ZZ--&-O Date_ / '— 2' appellant V ez� Vote: Yes Q No Fist f;..pdings below: 1. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Vote: Yes Q list findings below: 1. 2. 3. ='indinrs in accordance with ;section 446P of the Planning & Developn: -nt Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circuustances or conditions generally created b; the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located;- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility.that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; Fj (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 0 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development -of adjacent property, nor tie detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.' - Appeal Date Appellant Sign W r SOUTH BIUMLINGTON ZONING BOA^.D OF ADJUSTNENT ?indings in accordance with Section L46P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shaoe, or exceptional topc.;raphical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and, that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the c'rcui❑stances or conditions generally created b; the provisions of the zon;ng regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the crop,-:�ty is located; El (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions or the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enat,le the reasonable use of the property; ❑ (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 1i (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or Permanently impair the apnrepriate use or development .of adjacent property, nor 1 e detrimental to tr.e public welfare; and 11 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the :nip.; mum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least mocification Possible of the wing regulations and of th- Plan. Appeal � Date Z 0 AnpellantjEwohfr vP4_:i�ftn Vote: Yes No F] Sign W - C, (ff. in IV List findings below: 1- NeU SIG C.t_ Lw1 /S LNG- a dAj ?R& i4X vS LL 71 Is u M Y L4*cN 1A1 k VNIZ L 1) t*L. bus CW4 AA VA&h&irkM rA 3• SOU".H BURLINGTON ZONING BOAT D OF ADJUSTiENT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; E (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility.that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date 6G - Appellant Vote: Yes Q No Sign—,, 2 List findings below: 2. 3.